909R86001 516 1986 NEPIS online hardcopy LM 20100324 single page tiff OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY Santa Clara Valley Integrated Environmental Management Project July 1986 John R. Froines, Ph.D. Harlan Rotblatt, B.A. Cornelia Dellenbaugh, M.P.H. Jessie Schnell, M.P.H. Mitchell Shandling, B.A. Jacqueline Nowell, M.P.H. image: ------- TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Sunrnary v List of Figures xlii Lost of Tables xliii List of Appendices xlv Glossary of Acronyms xlvi Glossary of Measurement Abbreviations xlvii 1. Introduction 1 2. Regulatory and Resource Agencies Related to Occupational Exposure 2 2.1 Introduction 2 2.2 Federal OSHA 2 2.2.1 Functions of OSHA 3 2.2.1.1 Enforcement 3 2.2.1.2 Standards 4 2.2.1.3 Education and Consultation 7 2.2.2 State Plans 7 2.3 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) 8 2.3.1 On-Site Investigations 8 2.3.2 Collection of Data on Hazards Present in U.S. Industries 9 2.3.2.1 Current Intelligence System 10 2.3.2.2 Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances ... 10 2.3.2.3 Literature Searches 10 2.3.2.4 Hazard Surveys 10 2.3.3 Development of Methods for Mcnitoring Exposures and Testing Protective Equipment 10 2.3.4 Research and Standards Recommendations 11 2.3.5 Education of Industrial Hygienists and other Occupational Safety and Health Professionals 11 2.4 Environment^ Protection Agency 11 2.5 CAL/OSHA 12 2.5.1 Components of the CAL/OSHA Program 13 2.5.1.1 CAL/OSHA Program Office 13 2.5.1.2 Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board 13 2.5.1.3 Division of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH) .. 13 2.5.1.4 Occupational Safety and Health Appeals Board 19 image: ------- 2.5.1.5 CAI/OSHA Consultation Service 19 2.5.1.6 Hazard Evaluation System and Information Service (HESIS) 20 2.5.1.7 Northern and Southern Occupational Health Centers .. 20 2.5.1.8 Air and Industrial Hygiene laboratory .. 21 2.5.2 CM/OSHA Compliance Activity in Santa dara County 21 2.5.2.1 Basis of Field Office Inspections 22 2.5.2.2 Hew Inspections are Performed 22 2.5.2.3 Violations and Penalties 22 2.6 California Division of ]>h"r statistics and Research (DLSR) 25 2.6.1 U.S. Bureau of labor Statistics Annual Survey 25 2.6.2 Etrployer's Report of Occupational Injury or Illness 26 2.6.3 Doctor's First Report of Occupational Injury or Tllnpss 28 2.7 California Department of Food and Agriculture (DFA) 29 2.7.1 Pesticide Use and Illness Surveillance 29 2.7.2 Health Effects Information 29 2.7.3 Investigation and Enforcement ' 30 2.8 California Department of Health Services (DOHS) 30 2.8.1 Epidemiological Studies Section 30 2.3.2 Resource for Cancer Epidemiology 31 2.8.3 Radiological Health Branch 31 2.8.4 Toxic Substances Control Division 31 2.8.5 The Petris Bill (SB 495) 31 2.9 California Workers Compensation System 32 2.10 Local Agencies, Organizations, and Regulations 33 2.10.1 Santa dara County Department of Health 33 2.10.2 Santa Clara County Agricultural Commissioner's Office 33 2.10.3 Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinances 33 2.10.4 SCOOSH 35 2.10.5 Valley Health Center 35 3. Measurement and Evaluation of Occupational Exposures 36 3.1 Introduction . 36 3.2 Standards ..... 36 3.2.1 Authority 36 3.2.2 Terminology 37 3.2.3 Process of Standards Development 33 3.3.4 Differences Between State and Federal Standards 38 3.3.5 Factors in Developing a Standard 39 -11- image: ------- 3.3 Measurement of Occupational Exposures 40 3.3.1 EnviLumfcintal Monitoring 40 3.3.2 Biological Monitoring 42 3.3.2.1 Definition auii Purpose 42 3.3.2.2 Advantages and Limitations . 42 3.3.2.3 Most Canincn Specimens 43 4. Occupational Hazards in Santa dara County 45 4.1 Introduction 45 4.2 Methods 46 4.2.1 Problems in Data Collection 47 4.2.2 Data Sources 47 4.2.3 Methods for Ranking Industry by Potential Exposure 48 4.2.3.1 NIOSH Industrial Risk Index (IRI) 48 4.2.3.2 CSHA Weighted Index Ranking (OWI) 49 4.2.3.3 Industry Rankings Based on Actual Exposure Information: The Inspection-Based Industry Ranking (IBER) 49 4.2.3.4 Comparison of Results of NICSVIRI and QSHA OWI Ranking Systems 52 4.2.4 Use of the IBER System for Industrial Ranking 52 4.2.5 Employment Characteristics for Santa Clara County 56 4.3 Results 56 4.3.1 Analysis of Employment Characteristics for Santa Clara County 56 4.3.2 Industry Ranking Results 56 4.3.2.1 IBER Ranking Results 56 4.3.2.2 IRI and OWI Rankings for Santa dara County 65 4.3.2.3 Overlap Among IRI, OWI and IBER 73 4.3.2.4 CAI/OSHA. Compliance Information 74 4.3.2.5 Summary of Approaches to Industry Ranking 74 4.4 Conclusions Based on Ranking 76 4.5 Discussion 84 4.5.1 Intervention 84 4.5.2 Tracking of Exposures Over Time 84 4.5.3 Planning 85 4.5.4 Research 85 4.5.5 Complement to Disease Surveillance 85 4.5.6 Standard Setting 85 -111- image: ------- 5. Industry Prof lies 87 5.1 Semiconductors and Related Devices (SIC 3674) . 33 5.2 Electronic Conponents (SIC 3679) 118 5.3 Miscellaneous Plastics Products (SIC 3079) 139 5.4 Electroplating (SIC 3471) ... 147 5.5 General Medical and Surgical Hospitals (SIC 8062). 153 5.6 FMC Corporation (Military Vehicle Manufacture) 158 6. Recommendations 162 -iv- image: ------- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Background This report has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of contract number 68-01-7002 of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The report represents an assessment of available information on occupational exposures within Santa Clara County, California, and was conducted as a companion piece to the first phase of EPA's Integrated Environmental Management Project (IEMP). The IEMP is a broad assessment of health risks from "toxic pollutants", and of methods to manage those risks. The decision to assess workplace exposures within the Santa Clara Valley was made by the lEMP's Intergovernmental Coordinating Committee and Public Advisory Committee. The purpose of the work is to provide a context for the environmental risk findings which the IEMP is developing in Santa Clara County, and to provide local elected offi- cials and other interested parties with a means of tying the two sets of issues (envi- ronmental and occupational) together. Based on a preliminary assessment of the type and quality of available data, the IEMP, in consultation with its advisory committees, concluded that this study should focus on qualitative analysis of occupational expo- sures and risks, rather than a quantitative risk assessment within that context. Thus, the report identifies types of toxic exposures in Santa Clara County work- places and compares the relative magnitude of such exposures among industries. In addition, the report reviews the framework for monitoring and regulating occupational exposures in the county. The report does not, however, attempt to quantify the health risks associated with identified exposures, nor does it attempt to calculate the pro- portion of overall risk from toxic exposures in the County contributed by occupational sources. 2. Structure of the Report In keeping with the guidelines set forth by the IEMP, the report encompasses the following subject matter a. Descriptions of federal, state, and local agencies responsible for analyzing workplace exposures, and for setting and enforcing standards (Section 2); b. Discussion of the means for measuring and evaluating occupational exposures, including review of standards-setting procedures, standards provisions, and methods of exposure monitoring (Section 3); c. Qualitative discussion of the substances to which workers in Santa Clara County industries may be exposed, and the possible order of magnitude of those exposures (Section 4); d. Profiles of selected industries deemed important to a consideration of occupa- tional health in Santa Clara County (Section 5); and e. Recommendations for further possible research or action by appropriate agencies (Section 6). -v- image: ------- The discussions of occupational health-related agencies in Santa Clara County (Section 2) and measurement and evaluation techniques (Section 3) are essentially descriptive, prepared from interviews with appropriate agency personnel and review of written source material. However, the ability of local agencies to help analyze and control occupational hazards was an important focus in our investigations and has bearing on the recommendations we have made. Therefore, a summary of findings pertaining to local agencies and occupational health is given below. The balance of the executive summary is given to discussion of occupational hazards in Santa Clara County, as presented in Sections 4 and 5 of the report. 3. Occupational Health in Santa Clara County: the Local Context. Among the guidelines given by IEMP was that the report include an analysis of local resources available to identify and manage occupational hazards or illnesses in the county. Presented below are brief descriptions of key agencies or data systems relevant to occupational health in Santa Clara County which are based in the county. (Section 2 and Appendix 10 of the report give a more comprehensive picture of such agencies statewide.) 3.1 Division of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH, part of the CAL/OSHA Program) DOSH is a state agency responsible for inspecting workplaces to ascertain their compliance with CAL/OSHA occupational health and safety standards. The local DOSH office is the governmental agency most directly concerned with occupational health in the county. The DOSH office for Santa Clara County (as well as Santa Cruz, San Bonito, and Monterey Counties) is the Region I District 2 office located in San Jose. As of March, 1986, this office was staffed by four industrial hygienists, with a fifth due to be added in the near future. According to the state staffing formula for occu- pational health inspectors (industrial hygienists), based on complaint volume, the Region I District 2 office was entitled to six industrial hygienists, but DOSH offi- cials did not know as of March 1986 whether or not a sixth industrial hygienist would eventually be added. In fiscal year 1983, the San Jose office conducted 119 total industrial hygiene inspections, 59 of which resulted in the issuance of a citation or information memo- randum. In fiscal year 1984, the office conducted a total of 134 industrial hygiene inspections, 52 of which resulted in a citation or information memorandum. In both years, approximately 60-75% of the inspections were in Santa Clara County. Thus, in fiscal year 1983, between approximately 72 and 90 industrial hygiene inspections took place in Santa Clara County; and in fiscal year 1984, this total was between 80 and 100. Exact figures were not available from the District Office. (Computerized data from the DOSH Management Information Unit (MIU) were obtained for fiscal years 1979-84, but inconsistencies in these data made them unsuitable for inclusion in this report.) 3.2 Santa Clara County Health Department The regulation of occupational exposures by the County Health Department is pres- ently severely limited. The Department's Section of Occupational Health (formerly -vi- image: ------- referred to as Division of Occupational Health), once staffed by two chemists, three industrial hygienists, a physician, a nursing consultant, and a director in the early seventies, is currently staffed by a single chemist. The Section has been allocated one industrial hygienist position, which is vacant. Medical records and reports com- piled in the 20 years of the Section's existence are in hard copy files only: nothing has been computerized. Some activities relevant to occupational health are currently performed by the Office of Hazardous Materials in the Department's Environmental Health Services Divi- sion. This unit performs air monitoring for other county agencies on request of those agencies. The Division does not at present respond to monitoring requests from the public. The Office of Hazardous Materials also administers the Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinance for the county (see below). 3.3 The Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinances Santa Clara County in 1983 passed a Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinance requir- ing any party storing hazardous materials to obtain and keep a current hazardous mate- rials storage permit from the county. All major municipalities in the county have passed identical ordinances, administered by local fire departments. Provisions of the ordinance concerning materials regulated, the Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement (HMIS), the Hazardous Materials Management Plan (HMMP) and inspections and records are relevant to the identification of potential occupational exposures. Both the HMIS and the monitoring log kept in accordance with the HMMP hold promise as tools for occupational hazard surveillance, insofar as they identify names and gen- eral quantities of toxic substances in use in a particular plant or industry in the county. However, use of Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinances data to identify hazardous workplaces is disappointingly limited at present, due to incomplete report- ing and computerization. Failure to include Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code information in the HMIS requirements, decentralized record-keeping, and limited computer capability of some municipalities all hamper use of these data for industry- wide surveillance, and make them more suitable for identifying hazards used in indi- vidual firms. The County currently has plans to compile a centralized inventory of hazardous material users in the county, derived from municipal data from Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinances, and from data to be collected in compliance with AB 2185 (the Waters Bill). (This bill requires the County to develop an inventory of facilities using hazardous materials to create area emergency response plans.) This central inventory would be maintained by the County Health Department's Office of Hazardous Materials. The specific form and content of this database have not yet been deter- mined. The inventory will not be completed before 1987, and a precise timetable for completion has not been established. The Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinances also give the county and municipalities the right, at their discretion, to conduct inspections to ascertain compliance with the ordinance. (Annual inspections will be mandatory to assure compliance with AB 2185.) Examination of inspection records for violations may indicate firms with potential occupational exposures either due to direct employee exposure from storage leaks, or by suggesting a bad actor firm, i.e. a firm whose bad record in hazardous materials storage might indicate similar negligence in employee exposure. -vii- image: ------- 3.4 The Santa Clara County Agricultural Commissioner's Office. The Agricultural Commissioner's Office investigates occupational exposures to pes- ticides in Santa Clara County. The Commissioner receives pesticide use reports from local companies and agencies, and pesticide illness reports from the County Health Officer (who receives them from physicians), and investigates all reported cases of pesticide-related illness resulting from use, handling, mixing, loading or residues of pesticides. (Illnesses resulting from the manufacture of pesticides are investigated by the DOSH San Jose office.) In 1984, there were 27 physician-reported pesticide- related illnesses in Santa Clara County, 6 of which were agriculturally related. 3.5 Valley Health Center The Valley Health Center, part of the county hospital in San Jose (the Valley Med- ical Center) currently operates an occupational medicine clinic. The clinic is staffed by one occupational health physician, and one occupational health nurse. Coop- eration between this clinic and the County Department of Health could conceivably enhance local surveillance of manifest occupational disease. 3.6 Kaiser-Permanente Health Plan of Northern California Kaiser-Permanente Health Plan of Northern California is a comprehensive health plan with centralized computer data bases. In 1978, Kaiser conducted a pilot study of cancer rates among specific occupational groups in its membership. This study was performed primarily to test the research technique, and did not generate clear-cut results. No report was produced from the study. This type of study, however, is a potentially valuable tool for identifying illness patterns by occupation and industry. Kaiser and other comprehensive health plans with members in Santa Clara County offer excellent study populations, insofar as their data systems are extensive and central- ized, their membership is largely employment based (i.e. members join through their employer), and members remain in the health plan over long periods of time. The County Health Department could conceivably encourage, support, and coordinate such studies. 4. Occupational Hazards in Santa Clara County: Methods, Results, and Discussion. 4.1 Overview Sources of occupational hazard in Santa Clara County were assessed by type of industry: our aim was to identify those industries in the county which pose the great- est potential for occupational health problems. We have framed our analysis in terms of "potential" problems due to our use of exposure data (in contrast to disease data) projected for the county from national data bases. To be consistent with other parts of the IEMP, we restricted our assessment to hazards from chemical exposures only, and did not consider physical or psychological hazards. -viii- image: ------- Our main approach to identifying occupational hazards in the county was to compare industries by employment in the county, potential exposures, and actual exposures, using national exposure data obtained from the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). These data were the only computerized sources on potential or actual expo- sures to toxic substances available for the entire spectrum of industry represented in Santa Clara County. Data from the computerized sources were evaluated using three distinct methods, two of which analyzed potential exposures, and one of which analyzed actual past expo- sures. Because these methods emphasize different factors in comparing industry hazards, they offer in their collective application a more comprehensive understanding of such hazards than have been achieved through a single analytic approach. Based on each of these assessments, we then ranked industries in order of relative hazardous- ness, as determined by each method. Within the limitations of the data bases, these rankings represent meaningful methods for identifying potentially hazardous industries. The approaches taken to establishing a relative ranking derive from the view that the most hazardous indus- tries are those with the greatest number of workers exposed to the highest levels of the most hazardous agents. For purposes of this report, we believe that measures of actual exposure (i.e., data derived from the OSHA MIS, described below) are less sub- ject to error than potential exposure data derived from the NOHS data base. Ranking of industry in a county such as Santa Clara which is reasonably unique relative to other industrial areas in the U.S. is worrisome, especially where the data to be used are drawn from a very different cross-section (i.e., from federal data). However, given the total lack of exposure data at the state and local level, we believe that the approach taken here is the only reasonable approach available. From our analysis of industry exposure hazards and the resultant industry rankings we designated 67 industries as "potentially hazardous Santa Clara County industries." Included in this list were industries with significant Santa Clara County employees (i.e., over 300 employees) which ranked in the top 20% in any of the three ranking systems. Also included in the list were industries which did not rank among the most hazardous industries, but which had a record of actual high exposures to specific hazardous chemicals. Two industries, hospitals and semiconductor manufacturers, were included in the list due to special features of these industries and their high employment levels in the county. In addition to comparing industries by computerized data sources, we also reviewed all documented violations of exposure standards by Santa Clara County firms from 1979-1984, as disclosed by CAL/OSHA inspection records. The utility of these records to identify firms or industries which pose exposure problems is severely limited, how- ever, and hence these data were not incorporated into industry comparisons. Finally, based on the analysis of employment and exposure patterns, we selected six industries for more detailed discussion. Profiles of these industries (Section 5 of the report) draw upon information which, due to lack of suitable computerization, we were unable to use for the overall industry comparisons. This information includes cases of occupational disease, actual exposure levels found in Santa Clara County firms by CAL/OSHA, and exposures found by NIOSH in inspections of firms in California and other states. -ix- image: ------- A more detailed discussion of analytic methods and results follows below. Results of the six industry profiles are given in Section 4.1.4 of this Summary. 4.2 Identification of Hazardous Industries by Computerized Data Bases 4.2.1 Criteria for Identifying Hazardous Industries As noted above, the principal approach to occupational exposure hazards in Santa Clara County used for this report was to compare the full range of industries in the county according to the following criteria: a) Industry size in Santa Clara County. Industry size is characterized by the number of persons employed in a given 4-digit Standard Industrial Classifica- tion Code (SIC). The distribution of employees within a SIC was also consid- ered important. For example, a SIC with total employment of 1,000 may include 10 facilities of 100 persons each or 1 facility employing a 1,000 persons. b) Potential exposure to a significant number of highly toxic agents. Potential exposure denotes the presence of the toxic agents in the industry, and incorporates calculation of the number of workers likely to encounter the substance. c) Documented high exposure to multiple agents which have significant toxicitv. Documented exposure denotes actual measurements of worker exposure using industrial hygiene techniques. 4.2.2 Data Sources. To obtain the above information and develop industry rankings, the following com- puterized data sources were used. Industry size and employment demographics were evaluated using the NIOSH Industrial File for Santa Clara County. This file contains a listing of all Santa Clara County employers registered with Dun's Marketing Ser- vices, and is the most comprehensive non-confidential listing of employers available. The file lacks only public employment sites and those few companies not registered with Dun's Marketing Services (small establishments with no need to set up credit for buying supplies, and a few large companies who never deal with public financial insti- tutions). The file is current to September 1983. Though the NIOSH Industrial File is the best available source of company and employment distribution among industries, it contains inaccuracies. The primary dis- crepancies include: listings of companies which have ceased operation or moved to another location, incorrect number of employees, and inappropriate SIC code designa- tions. Inaccurate SIC code designation can have significant implications when attemp- ting to set priorities, e.g., compliance programming, and intervention strategies. For example, SIC 3341, secondary lead smelting, the most potentially hazardous indus- try in the IBER industry ranking system (described below), has 4 establishments with 80 employees in SIC 3341 in Santa Clara County according to the NIOSH Industrial File. A telephone check of the 4 establishments identified in the NIOSH file indicated that they did not actually conduct manufacturing in Santa Clara County as designated by this SIC. -x- image: ------- Documented exposures to toxic agents were obtained from the federal OSHA Manage- ment Information System (MIS') inspection Files. These files contain actual measured worker exposures sampled by federal OSHA during workplace inspections. These data reflect federal OSHA inspection patterns, i.e., they are derived predominantly from states which, unlike California, do not administer their own occupational health and safety programs. While it would be preferable to use state or local data, federal OSHA inspection records are the only substantial body of compiled data on actual exposures. These records give precise levels of exposure but they are subject to certain biases. For example, inspections are not random: they are based largely on complaints. There- fore, some industries are more frequently inspected than others. Moreover, inspec- tions are targeted to search for the worst exposures in an industry, not a distribution of all the exposures. For the purposes of ranking industries with the greatest potential for occupational health problems, however, this targeting may not represent a major problem. The OSHA MIS data used in this report covered almost four years of OSHA inspections (1979-1982), comprising approximately 15,000 inspections and 60,000 test (exposure) samples from 475 SICs. Potential exposures to toxic substances were obtained from the NTOSH National Occupational Hazard Survey (NOHS). a national survey of about 5,000 establishments. The NOHS compiled exhaustive lists of substances found in a systematic random sample of industries, and estimated the number of workers exposed. NOHS made no measurements of actual exposures however. Therefore, the presence of the chemicals in an industry represented potential exposures only. To compensate for the lack of direct sampling, NOHS did record whether exposure was subject to engineering controls or personal pro- tective equipment was required and whether potential exposure to workers was full-time or part-time. The NOHS was conducted from 1972 - -1974. These three sources — the NIOSH Industrial File current to September 1983, the OSHA MIS Inspection Files 1979-82, and the NIOSH NOHS completed 1974 — form the basis for Industry hazard rankings in this report. 4.2.3 Problems in Data Collection. Though the three data sources used in ranking industries allow a compelling assessment of potential occupational health problems in Santa Clara County, other data would have enhanced this assessment. Where problems were encountered in developing data on chemical exposure and industry demographics, they were due in most part to one of two general situations -- either the desired data were not available, or in some way their applicability was limited. There were three reasons for data not being avail- able. These include: a) the desired information had not been gathered at all; b) it had been gathered without the advantage of computerization and/or tabulation' or c) it was gathered under the auspices of an agency which held the data confidential. Specific examples of data sources reviewed for incorporation in industry rankings but which suffered from problems of availability or application include the following:' a) The NIOSH National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES). The NOES is an updated national survey recently completed by NIOSH, similar to the NOHS of 1974-1976 The NOES will have limited usefulness until the chemical identities of trade name products are made known in 1987 or 1988. Therefore, the NOES could not be used in this report to rank industries. -xi- image: ------- b) CAL/OSHA compliance information. Data derived from actual inspections in Santa Clara County and/or California may have utility in ranking of indus- tries. Unfortunately, CAL/OSHA compliance data are not computerized. Each case file must be reviewed individually and exposure painstakingly extracted by hand if CAL/OSHA information is to be used in assessing the occupational health problems in Santa Clara County. It was therefore not practical in the scope of this research to employ CAL/OSHA exposure data in industry rankings. c) NIOSH Health Hazard Evaluations, Industry Wide Studies, Criteria Documents and Control Technology studies. These studies are performed by NIOSH on its own initiative or by request, and include exposure monitoring. This information is also not computerized and, though valuable, is in general more limited in scope than the federal OSHA MIS inspection data used in the report. d) Environmental monitoring conducted by individual companies or their insurance carriers. With the exception of some data provided by representatives from the semiconductor manufacturing industry, exposure information from environ- mental monitoring programs conducted by businesses or their insurance carriers was not available for review and evaluation. e) Inventories of firms using hazardous materials, maintained under Municipal Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinances. These data were poorly computerized, and even computerized tabulations lacked important information, particularly SIC codes. f) Disease reporting systems maintained by the California Division of Labor Stat- istics and Research (DLSR). Though the three occupational disease reporting systems kept by DLSR are as extensive and detailed as any existing in the nation, most tabulations are insufficiently precise (i.e. are not for 4-digit SIC codes), and do not capture chronic conditions. These data were therefore felt to be unsuitable for general industry comparisons, though they are pre- sented in part in the six industry profiles. g) Occupational data. Because toxic exposures can vary significantly among dif- ferent jobs in the same industry or plant, analysis by occupation is a desir- able complement to analysis by industry. The Employment Development Depart- ment (EDD) of the State of California maintains an industry-occupation matrix. Unfortunately, for purposes of this research, it is highly confidential (that is, restricted to EDD use only). A data tape was obtained which listed fed- eral Occupational Employment Survey (OES) estimates of employment patterns by SIC. Lack of numeric coding of occupational titles precluded using this tape to construct an industry-occupation matrix for this report. 4.2.4 Methods for Ranking Potentially Hazardous Industries. Three methods were used to analyze the above data bases and rank industries by exposure hazard. These were a) the NTOSH Industrial Risk Index (IRI). b) the OSHA Weighted Index (Own, and c) the Inspection Based Exposure Ranking (TBER). The IRI and OWI systems are both based on the NIOSH National Occupational Hazard Survey, and thus reflect potential exposures to toxic substances identified in given industries by the survey. The IBER system, in contrast, is based upon OSHA MIS inspection files of 1979-82, and reflects actual exposures in given industries. As noted, all three sys- tems are based on federal data. Rankings generated by these systems must therefore be -xii- image: ------- understood as projections made for the county, and not as direct measures of hazardous exposure in Santa Clara County firms. 4.2.4.1 NIOSH Industrial Risk Index (IRI) This system was developed by NIOSH as an instrument to target the most hazardous industries for research. To determine a relative ranking of SIC codes, NOHS data is first used to estimate the number of workers exposed to a particular substance in a given industry. The result is weighted by a hazard rating for each substance present based on detailed information in the Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances (RTECS). The IRI considers over 1700 chemicals in ranking industries. In estimating worker exposures, the IRI gives full-time exposures twice the weight of part-time exposures, and assumes that controls reduce exposure by 90%. The IRI system emphasizes SICs where there is widespread exposure to highly potent chemicals and no use of controls. The IRI also highlights SIC groups with very large numbers of potent substances. For example, manufacture of paints, where there are hundreds of very hazardous chemicals, ranks 4th on IRI. 4.2.4.2 OSHA Weighted Index Ranking (OWI). To develop inspection priorities, federal OSHA used NOHS to design a 'Weighted Index' (OWI) by SIC code. This system is currently not in use by federal or State OSHA programs. There are significant differences between this index and the IRI: only chemicals regulated, by OSHA are included and there is no correction for whether controls are in place;, because OSHA must also inspect controlled exposures. Though OWI, like IRI, uses NOHS data to estimate exposures, OWI gives full-time exposures five times the weight of part-time exposures. To assess a chemical's toxic potency, OSHA developed a simple 1, 3, 7, 10 rating scale, with 10 being the most serious. OWI rankings emphasize workplaces with high numbers of full-time exposures to large numbers of chemicals. An industry must have multiple exposures in order to be high in the OWI ranking: no SICs in the top twenty-five of the OWI have fewer than 90 chemicals listed. 4.2.4.3 Industry Rankings Based on Actual Exposure Information: The Inspection-Based Industry Ranking (IBERs). We developed the IBER ranking system using federal OSHA MIS compliance data from 1979-82. SICs with fewer than three inspections in the time period analyzed were eli- minated to ensure adequate assessment of the SICs hazards. Some general limitations of the OSHA MIS data were noted above, including poten- tial bias toward certain industries. An additional problem arises in applying those data to Santa Clara County. In evaluating OSHA MIS exposure data, it is appropriate to use OSHA PEL's (Permissible Exposure Limits) as measures of the severity of expo- sure, because these were the limits which the firms being inspected were required to observe. However, a substantial number of CAL/OSHA standards are stricter than federal OSHA standards, and this may have an impact on exposure levels for those chemicals in -Kill- image: ------- California for those chemicals in California plants. Moreover, CAL/OSHA regulates well over 100 substances for which no corresponding federal standard exists. Whether differences in geographical location, age of the industry, and other factors are important variables which would affect both the actual exposure levels and the rela- tive ranking of industries remains to be determined. Until the State of California computerizes its compliance data or obtains environmental monitoring data from compa- nies, these questions cannot be resolved. For the purpose of this report, we must assume that the national rankings have relevance to the local situation. It must be added that, even with respect to the more stringent and extensive Cali- fornia standards, there are cases where these standards may not appear to be adequate, especially in poorly studied industrial settings or where the standard is based on obsolete or inadequate toxicologic testing. In using OSHA inspection data, however, we were obliged to evaluate exposure severity in terms of the OSHA standards. To generate IBER industry ranks, we developed a schematic method to summarize the exposure test sample (monitoring) data from OSHA. There is one record for each time a substance was inspected in a SIC, denoted as a "substance-inspection unit." Thus, if a substance was sampled in five inspections in a given SIC, it is counted as five sub- stance-inspections; if two different substances are sampled in each of five inspec- tions in a SIC, there are a total of ten substance-inspections. We averaged the test samples for each substance in an inspection and divided the result by the substance's federal OSHA PEL to give a "Severity Level" for that substance-inspection unit, expressed as a percentage of the PEL. The Severity Levels for each substance found in a SIC were then combined for all substance-inspection units and a mean and median value calculated for the distribu- tion. Both values were needed because the distribution of Severity Levels for one substance within a SIC is almost always highly skewed, thereby yielding different val- ues for the mean and median. However, this scheme alone would not take into account the varying number of sub- stances in a SIC. If the mean or median were calculated without regard to the number of substances, the values would treat 50 test samples of one substance the same as 5 test samples of 10 different substances. If they were summed without regard to number of inspections, they would treat one inspection with high exposures the same as 10 inspections with high exposures. A measure was added to address the number of sub- stance inspections, as well as the number of substances in a SIC and the extent of exposure. Altogether, four "Inspection-Based Exposure Rating" (IBER) measures were developed to account for both substances and substance-inspections, as well as the mean and median Severity Levels. These four IBER variables are: a) MedSubs - The median of the Severity Levels for all substances-inspection units multiplied bv the number of unique substances sampled in the SIC. b) MedSublns - The median of the Severity Levels for all substance-inspection units multiplied bv the number of substance-inspections for the SIC. c) MnSubs - The mean of the Severity Levels for all substance-inspection units multiplied bv the number of unique substances sampled in the SIC. d) MnSublns - The mean of the Severity Levels for all substance-inspection units multiplied bv the number of substance-inspect ions for the SIC. -xiv- image: ------- The OSHA OWI four-point (1,3,7,10) hazard weighting system was applied to the inspection data to weight each substance's frequency of sampling and severity of expo- sure according to its degree of hazardousness. In order to use the IBERs to rank SICs, each of the four IBER measures (MedSubs, MedSublns, MnSubs, MnSublns) was independently calculated, and four lists of the most hazardous industries (one for each measure) were developed. An overall ranking was constructed from those four lists, with the lowest total score ranking as #1 or most hazardous on the overall list. In analyzing industries for these potential impact on occupational health in Santa Clara County, we considered both this overall ranking, and the ranking within each of the four separate measures. (Specifically, we consid- ered the number of measures in which an industry was listed in the top 20%). 4.2.4.4 High Exposure to a Single Substance. In addition to identifying industries with high IBER rankings, we also used the OSHA MIS data to identify identified industries with low IBER rankings, but with high exposure to one specific chemical. Industries which ranked high in IBERS have two characteristics, namely high exposures to multiple substances. IBER rankings are weighted toward multiple exposures. Industries which have documented high exposures but only to a single substance constitute a highly significant exposure problem; -since there is only a single substance, however, the IBER ranking is low. The criteria for identifying SICs in this category were a minimum of 3 inspections, a mean severity level greater than 1.0 (exposure equal to or greater than the PEL), and an IBER rank- ing higher than 75 (i.e. in the 75 most hazardous overall IBER industries). For asbestos, a mean severity level of 0.25 was used since it is generally recognized that the current OSHA standard for asbestos is inadequate. More SICs would have been included if a lower severity level, e.g. 0.5, were selected. 4.2.5 Industry Rankings: Results 4.2.5.1 Employment characteristics of Santa Clara County (from the NIOSH Industrial File). There are 648,000 people employed in the county. Eleven SICs employ more than 10,000 persons each and account for 43.7% of Santa Clara County employment. One hundred and ten SICs employ more than 1,000 persons each and account for 82.7% of the county employment. Industries employing more than 300 persons account for 95% of all Santa Clara County employment. As anticipated, the electronics industry, including SICs 3573, 3674, 3679, and 3662, is the largest industry in the county. Schools (SICs 8211 and 8221), eating places (SIC 5812), hospitals (SIC 8062), architectural services (8911), research and development laboratories (SIC 7391), and guided missiles and space vehicles (SIC 3761), are also large employers, all employing over 10,00 workers. Below 10,000 employees, the types of industries are widely distributed, although there are a sig- nificant number of firms related to or part of the electronics industry. Within the top 11 SICs by total employment, there are a large number of small employers but there are also a significant number of large employers. Large employers in the top 11 SICs account for 50% of all large employers in the county. In SIC 3761, a single large -xv- image: ------- employer (Lockheed Missile and Space Company) accounts for virtually all the employ- ment. 4.2.5.2 High IBER-OWI-IRI ranking. A significant number of industries have been identified as ranking high in one of these systems. Executive Summary Table 1 lists those industries ordered by SIC code which we cal- culate have the greatest potential for significant exposures to workplace chemicals in Santa Clara County. No SIC on this list is documented to have problems in Santa Clara County, so the list should not be perceived as an indictment of a SIC. The industries on this list, however, are either known to have a large number of toxic chemicals in use or "have a history of high exposures to particular substances as measured in national surveys. The SICs listed in Executive Summary Table 1 all employ 300 persons or more in the county. (Industries employing more than 300 persons constitutes 95% of the employment in the county.) Industries employing fewer than 300 persons were excluded in order to limit the number of industries for further follow-up and analysis. Industries employing fewer than 300 persons but which rank high on IBERs certainly also deserve further evaluation (these industries are identified in the report. A high IBER ranking required that a SIC be in the top 20% of at least three of the four IBER ranks. Industries high on the OWI or IRI were those industries employing more than 300 persons and who were in the top 20% of the respective rankings. Executive Summary Table 1 lists fifteen SICs as high in the IBER ranking: these include 1622, 1761, 2086, 2819, 2821, 2879, 3079, 3229, 3312, 3441, 3479, 3499, 5093, 7216, and 7699. There are 39 SICs listed as high in the OWI ranking, and 22 SICs are listed as high in the IRI ranking. Many SICs with substantial employment and high rankings in IRI or OWI had low IBER rankings. It is instructive to contrast two SICs, 3573 (electronic computing) and 3679 (electronic components) since they are large employers in Santa Clara County, rank in the top 20% of the IRI and OWI respectively, and are low in the IBERS. In 3573 (electronic computing), federal OSHA conducted 27 inspections during the period 1979-82 and sampled for 20 substances. There were no overexposures and the measured exposures were very low. These data reflect very few inspections and thus must be viewed with caution, but there is no obvious pattern of overexposure. In 3679 (elec- tronic components), there was a significantly greater number of inspections, 252, dur- ing the same period of time and the data indicate that there were occasional overexpo- sures to nine different toxic substances. A low IBER ranking does not, therefore, imply that there were nfl overexposures and that the particular SIC should be eliminated form further consideration. A low rank- ing may indicate that there was not a systematic pattern of overexposure. SICs ranked high in the OWI and IRI, 1743, 1752, 1793, 2541, 3511, 3573, 3652, 5084, 5541, 7391, and 7395, but had no inspection test samples violating an OSHA standard. In many cases there were few inspections and the potential for exposure cannot be discussed. -xvi- image: ------- Executive Summary Table 1 Industries Ranked Potentially Hazardous In Santa Clara County by Federal OSHA/NIOSH Data Rases.' SIC 1542 1611 1622 1623 1629 1711 1721 1731 1743 1752 1761 1791 1793 1739 2086 2434 2541 2751 2752 2819 2821 2834 2879 3079 3229 3312 3441 3444 3469 3471 3479 3499 3511 3544 3545 3559 3561 3569 3573 3599 3652 3662 3674 3679 3769 3811 3999 4932 5081 5084 5093 5511 5541 7216 7349 7391 7394 7395 7397 7399 7538 7539 7699 8021 806? 8071 8072 Nonresldentlal construction, nee. Highway and street construction. Bridge, tunnel, and elevated highway. Water, sewer, and utility lines. Heavy construction, nee. Plumbing, heating, air conditioning. Painting, paper hanging, decorating. Electrical work. Terrazzo, tile, marble, mosaic work. Floor laying and floor work, nee. Roofing and sheet metal work. Structural and steel erection. Glass and glazing work. Special trade contractors, nee. Rottled and canned soft drinks. Wood kitchen cabinets. Wood partitions and fixtures. Commercial printing, letterpress. Commercial printing, lithographic. Industrial Inorganic chemicals, nee. Plastics materials and resins. Phamaceutlcal preparations. Agricultural chemicals, nee. Miscellaneous plastics products. Pressed ft blown glass, nee. Blast furnaces ft steel mills. Fabricated structural metal. Sheet metal work. Metal stampings, nee. Plating ft Polishing Metal coating ft allied services Fabricated metal products, nee. Turbines ft Turbine generator sets. Special dies, tools, digs, ft fixtures. Machine tool accessories. Special Industry machinery, nee. Pumps * pumping equipment. General Industrial machinery, nee. Electronic computing equipment. Machinery, except electrical. Phonograph records. Radio 4 TV communication equipment. Semiconductors ft related devices. Electronic components nee. Space vehicle equipment, nee. Engineering ft scientific Instruments. Manufacturing Industries, nee. Gas * other services combined. Commercial machines ft equipment. Industrial machinery 1 equipment. Scrap ft waste materials. New ft used car dealers. Gasoline service stations. Ory cleaning plants, except rug. Building maintenance services, nee. Research ft development laboratories. Equipment rental. Photoflnlshlng laboratories. Commercial testing laboratories. Business services, nee. General automotive repair shops. Automotive repair shops. Repair services, nee. Office of dentists. General medical A surgical hospitals. Medical laboratories. Dental laboratories. No of Fmpl I 1279 96fl 330 770 . 430 4015 1125 1471 323 484 1425 327 376 1334 351 349 318 879 1652 63fi 303 1097 lOOfl ?flflfl 307 394 712 1571 305 1034 660 552 2350 528 384 1017 son 405 70,506 6337 306 73.075 52.187 23,849 465 4680 2375 7307 2943 1123 , 372 ' 7724 753 2645 14,603 1465 1077 1735 7111 1717 71B 1043 770 ' 14.27? 46? 360 Ranked High In h , A ^ec RFP" nwic I«Jd Chen • * ft * * * ft * ft * * • * * • * * * • * * • • * * • * ° * * * * • * • * • * • * • • * • * • * * * * • * * * • * • • * • * • * * * • a. >30o employees 1n the county. b. Inspection Rased on Exposure Ratings c. OSHA Weighted Index d. Industrial Risk Index -XVli- image: ------- 4.2.5.3 Specific chemical. We reviewed OSHA MIS inspection data for seventeen substances with recognized tox icity and a meaningful number of inspections in the federal file, including mercury, manganese, cadmium, beryllium, arsenic, nickel, trichloroethylene, methyl chloroform, methylene chloride, ethylene dichloride, benzene, formaldehyde, TDI/MDI, toluene, xylene, styrene, perchloroethylene, lead, asbestos, chromium, coal tar pitch vola- tiles, and silica. Of these the last five substances had SICs which had at least three inspections, a mean severity level over the PEL (over 1/4 the PEL for asbestos), and were not among the top 75 IBER-ranked industries. Altogether, there were 17 SICs meeting these criteria, shown in Executive Summary Table 1. Identification of these SICs represents a very important approach in our view, insofar as the identified substance may be endemic to the particular industry, so that we would expect to find that substance in use in any county where that industry was in operation. 4.2.5.4 Overlapping Ranking Systems. Particular emphasis needs to be directed to those industries where there is sub- stantial overlap between the OWI-IRI-IBER systems, especially where there is a size- able employment pattern. OWT and IRI Overlap Twelve SICs 7391, 5511, 4932, 5541, 2752, 1721, 2834, 2751, 3479, 3544, 2821 and 7699 are in the top 20% ranking of both OWI and IRI (Executive Summary Table 1). While recognizing the limits of these data bases, these industries were found to have a large number of hazardous chemicals with a significant number of employees potentially exposed. Additional investigations of these industries may be appropriate. OWI/TRI and IBER Overlap If an industry appears on the top. of OWI or IRI and IBER, it indicates that there is a history of high exposures to a number of highly toxic substances and that a sig- nificant number of workers are thought to be exposed. With no. consideration of employment in Santa Clara County, there were 71 SICs that appeared in the top 20% of at least three out of the four composite IBER listings (e.g. MnSubs). Of these 71, 10 SICs also appeared in the top 20% of the IRI listing of SICs, and 26 were in the top 20% of the OWI list as shown in Executive Summary Tables 2 and 3 respectively. There were 8 SICs that were in the top 20% of all three lists, 2821, 3731, 3715, 2851, 3269, 7699, 3479, and 3411. Of the 28 remaining SICs, 5 have no employment in Santa Clara County. The two largest SICs, 1761 and 7699, are characterized by being mainly small in individual company employment size, e.g., 142 of 150 establishments in SIC 1761 employ less than 50 persons and 250 of 252 estab- lishments in SIC 7699 employ less than 50. The SICs identified as being high in both IBERS and either OWI or IRI represent industries deserving of follow-up to determine whether similar patterns of exposure found in federal OSHA inspections are common to Santa Clara County. -xviii- image: ------- Executive Summary Table 2 INOUSTRirS RANKED IN TOP 20% Of INDUSTRIAL RISK INDEX (IRI) SIC INDUSTRY I X H- X I IRI IRI OW« j IBER S.C. COUNTY RANK RANK RATINGS EMPLOYMENT IN TOP 20% 1<496 MISC. FABRIC. WIRE PROD. 2834 PHAIIMACEU1 ICAL PHEP. 2893 PRINTING INK 2851 PAINIS Ic ALLIED PHD. 2295 COATED FABRICS,NOT RUBBER 3565 INDUSTRIAL PAIICRNS 28113 SURFACE ACIIVE ACCNIS 2992 LUBRIC. OILS. CREASES 28)3 MCOICINALS. B01ANICALS 2842 POLISHES. SANS!. PRO. 1381 DRILLING OIL AND GAS 2821 PLASTICS MATERIALS 2262 FINISHING PLAN IS, SYN 3996 HARD SURF. FLOOR COVER 8931 ACCOUNTING. AUDITING 1743 URHAZ20, TILE. MARBLE 2591 DRAPERY HARDWARE. BLINDS 2844 TOILET PREPARATIONS 3299 NONHETALLIC MINERAL PRO 2022 CHEESE. NA1UHAL Ic PHOC 8099 HEALTH SERVICES. NEC 2831 BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS 35 1 2 0 0 0 4 • e 3 « t . 2 _ 6 2 0 4 • 0 . 0 it • 136 1097 5 189 . 16 i , 135 85 13 303 6 3612 323 124 53 6 104 205 528 484 15 306 2645 . 232 1125 1652 300 4288 145 11 28)5 27 2224 229 13 405 100 83 2457 5 92 16 96 image: ------- Executive Sunmary Table 2 (2) INDUSTRIES HANKED IN TOP 20% OF INDUSTRIAL RISK INDCN (INI )2 SIC INOUStMY X X I I Ml RANK INI OWI § IBER S.C. COUNTY RANK RATINGS EMPLOYMENT IN TOP 20% 2047 PREPARED ANIMAl FEEDS 54 3952 LEAD PENCILS. ART GOODS 55 3554 PAPER IND. MACHINERY 56 3643 CURRENT-CARRYING WIRING 57 5081 COMMERCIAL MACHINES 58 59?I LIQUOR STORES 59 7699 REPAIR SERVICES. NEC 60 45OO AIR IRANSPORTAIION 61 3955 CARBON PAPER ft RIBBON 62 4131 INIERCIIY HIGHWAY TRANS. 63 eon orricES or PHYSICIANS 64 4721 TRANSPORT. ARRANGfMLNI 65 2761 MANIEOLD BUSINESS IORMS 66 5084 INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY 67 3694 ENGINE II EC. EQPT. 68 3731 SHIP BLOC, ft REPAIR. 69 3585 RETRIC. ft HEAT. EQPT. 70 7391 RESEARCH ft DEV. LABS 71 2/51 COMMERCIAL PRINIINC 72 4932 GAS AND OTHER SERVICE 73 3711 MOIOH VEHICLES 74 7949 COMMERCIAL SPORTS. NEC 75 3179 MEIAL COATING 76 2256 KNITTING MIILS 77 3811 ENG. ft SCIEN. INSTRUMENT 78 3623 WELDING APPARAIUS 79 3999 MIC. INUUSIRIES NEC 80 3567 IND. FURNACES ft OVCNS 81 4'l?2 COASTWISE IRANSPORI. 82 4580 AIR IRANSPORI SERVOS 83 3573 ELECTRONIC COMPUTING 84 3729 AIRCRAM ft PARTS NEC 85 NOTES: . NO DATA FOR THIS SIC • RANKING IS IN THE TOP 2Of OE ALL SICS IBER * INSPECTION BASED EXPOSURE RATINGS 0.553 O.552 0.550 0.550 0. 544 0.538 0.531 0.530 0.523 0.512 0.507 0.505 O.504 0.499 0.490 0. 490 0.489 0.489 0.485 0.484 0.480 0.411 0.471 0.469 0.469 0.158 0.158 O.157 0.143 0.442 0.441 0.437 m 270 230 333 175 208 27 • % 57 • 191 188 . 84 • 175 167 4 • 117 • 135 64 • 21 • 251 5 • m 260 151 207 48 • 90 • 293 . ^ m 0 2 9 t * • m 0 ^ 0 t 0 . 0 4 • 2 0 0 ^ 2 a 3 • > 0 0 0 0 , t 0 „ 9 B 102 2943 1085 1043 14 1 2120 231 1123 27 22 42 14603 829 2307 2599 660 4680 2 2375 32 t 70506 . image: ------- Executive Summary Table 3 INOUSfRICS RANKED IN IOP 20% Of OSIIA WEIGHTED INDEX (OWI) SIC INDUSTRY I X X 3996 HARD SURFACE ELOOR COVER 3269 POIIERY PRODUCTS, NEC 3325 STEEL FOUNDRIES, NEC 3731 SHIP BUILDING ft REPAIR 3479 MEIAL COATING 356% INDUSTRIAL PATTERNS 2791 TYPESEITING 2B'l3 SUHFACE ACTIVE AGENTS 2661 BLOC PAPER ft BOARD MILLS 3t4l46 ARCHITECIURAL METAL WORK 3531 CONSIRUCTION MACIHNfRY Jl4l41 EAURICAIED PLATE WORK 3568 POWER TRANSMISSION EQPT 28142 POLISHES ft SAN 11 PRO 2822 SVNIHETIC RUDDER 3553 WOODWORKING MACHINERY Jl4«4l fAUHIC SIRUCIURAL MEIAL 2435 HARDWOOD VENEER. PLYWOOD 4931 ELECTRIC ft OIHER SERVICE 1932 CAS AND OIHER SERVICE 4939 COMBINATION UTILITY SVC 3542 MACHINE TOOLS. MEIAL 3317 STEEL PIPE AND TUBES 2732 BOOK PRINTING 7692 WEI DING REPAIR 769<4 ARHAIURE REWINDING 7699 REPAIR SERVICES. NEC 3715 TRUCK TRAILERS 3532 MINING MACHINERY 3741 RAILROAD EQUIPMENT 3321 CRAV IRON FOUNDRIES 3691 STORAGE DAIIEHIES 2865 CYCLIC CRUDES. INTRMEDS 3792 TRAVEL TRAILERS, CAMPERS 5541 GASOLINE SVC SIATIONS 3322 MALLEABLE IRON FOUNDRIES 3449 HISC METAL WORK NEC 5511 NEW ft USED CAR DEALERS 3561 PUMPS AND PUMPING fQPT 2851 PAINTS ft ALLIED PRODS 3ilHl| SHEET MEIAL WORK 341 I MLIAL CANS 2821 PLASTIC HAIERIALS U2I PAINIINC. PAPER HANGING 1711 PIUHHINU. HEAI. AIH COND 3953 MAMKING DEVICES 3567 INOUSIRIAL FURNACES 0071 MIOICAL LAHORMOHIES 8U72 OfNIAL LAOURAIOItlLS 3>l62 IRON fc SltfL FORGING 2U1>« WOOU KI1CMF.N CAB I NT IS S6/J CLCC1RONIC IRANSI (IHHCMS OWI RANK 1 2 1 4 5 6 7 9 10 II 12 11 14 15 16 17 IB 19 21 •• 21 21 23 24 25 27 27 27 29 30 11 12 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 4/ 48 50 50 51 52 53 OSIIA WLICHID INDEX 235. 4 209.7 198.1 190.4 188.1 187.5 177.9 177.8 169.2 157.9 154.4 151.7 143.7 141.3 140.7 139.8 139.1 138.5 137.0 137.0 137.0 136.0 132.4 130.9 124.9 124.9 124 9 122.7 122.0 121.7 121.6 118. 1 114.8 113.7 110. B 108.6 107.0 106.6 106.6 106. 1 105.2 IU3.6 102.7 102.3 101.7 lot. 1 100.2 98.9 96.9 98.8 98.5 91. 7 IRI RANK 14 19 c 69 76 6 220 7 161 150 179 296 B 10 18 B 217 105 0 26 71 a 141 121 216 m m 60 49 162 270 119 9 B 40 149 168 15 14 4 290 41 12 11 230 198 81 > 1 IBER S RATINGS IN TOP 20% 2 4 • 4 • 4 • 1 • , O • 0 0 0 4 • 4 • 0 • 0 0 0 4 • O • 0 • ^ 0 0 0 2 0 46 • 4 • 0 4 • 4 • 4 • 2 2 • 4 • 1 • 2 1 4 • 1 • 1 • 4 • " 2 2 1 • 0 0 O O 1 O .C. COUNTY EMPLOYMENT * 27 1 22 660 16 257 t 0 84 197 109 ^ 85 14 128 712 % 15 2107 ^ 21 m 2 245 44 1041 5 a . 22 180 ^ 21 2224 10 ^ 4288 100 189 1521 229 303 1125 4015 51 32 462 360 55 3 image: ------- Executive Summary Table 3 (2) INDUSTRIES RANKED IN TOP 20% OF OSHA WEIGHTED INDEX (OWI) I X X H- H- SIC DESCR 3331 PRIMARY ALUMINUM 7251 SHOE REPAIR. HAT CLEANING 3955 CAROON PAPCR, RIBBONS 753t TOP AND RODV REPAIR 7531 TIRE RETREADNG. REPAIR 7535 PAINT SHOPS 7538 GENERAL AUTO REPAIR 7539 AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR.NEC 3562 BALL AND ROLLER BEARINGS 2751 COMMERCIAL PRINTING 2599 FUHNITURE, FIXTURES NEC 3915 JEWELLERS' MATERIALS 2611 PAPER COATING. GLAZES 1112 CONSTRUCTION SAND, GRAVEL HlU6 INOIIS1RIAL SAND 2893 PRINIING INK 3582 COMMERCIAL LAUNDRY EQPT 2831 PHARMACEUTICAL PREPS 28)3 MEDICINALS Ic BOTANICALS I'll! DIMENSION STONE 3M7I PLATING AND POLISHING 3769 SPACE VEHICLE EQUIP 3361 ALUMINUM FOUNDRIES 1761 ROOFING fc SHEET METAL 3519 METALWORKING MACHINERY 3263 FINE EARTHNWARE UTENSILS 2511 WOOD PARTITIONS 2761 MANIFOLD BUSINESS FORMS 3515 MACHINE TOOL ACCESSORIES 1111 DEEP SEA FOREIGN TRANSPRT 3198 FABRICATED PIPE 3199 FABRICA1EO METAL PROD NEC 1121 NONCONTIGUOUS AREA TRANS 1122 COASTWISE TRANSPORT 1123 INIERCOASTAL TRANSPORT 3399 PRIMARY MCIAL PHOO NIC 3732 BOA I BUILDING AND RPR 2511 MEIAL HOUSEHOLD FURNITURE 3221 GLAbS CONFAINIRS 3511 TURBINES fr TURBINE SEIS 32V I AURAS IVE PROOUC I S flO?I DENTIST OFFICES 25I9 HOUSIHOLO IUMNIIURE 3599 MACHINERY, NONfLECIRC 1582 AIRI'HFS k HYING flllDS 156) Alltpnr TERMINAL SERVICES 3)69 NONIERIIOUS FOUNDRIES 32/2 CONCRETE PRODUCTS,NIC 3559 SPICIAL INUUSIHY MACHINE 3183 AMMUNITION, NEC OWI RANK 55 i 56 57 60 60 60 60 60 63 61 66 67 68 . 70 70 71 72 73 71 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 83 81 85 86 87 ! 88 90 90 90 92 93 : 95 96 98 99 100 101 in? 1()i| 101 1U5 106 to/ 108 OSHA WEIGHTO INDEX 96.7 95.6 95.5 95.5 95.5 95.5 95.5 95.5 93.9 93.1 89.0 87.7 87.7 87.1 87.1 86.9 86.9 86.9 86.7 86.1 86.3 86.2 85.3 85.2 83.1 83.3 82.8 82.1 80.7 80.2 79.1 78.9 78.7 78.7 78.7 77.5 77.2 77.0 /5.6 75.0 71.9 71.8 71.1 73.1 72. 7 72. 7 71.5 70.7 70.0 69.7 IRI RANK 369 t 62 • B • t ^ • 17 • 72 • 205 9 16 • t 3 • 229 2 • 9 • f 123 260 272 t 126 66 • 235 88 302 188 , 82 . 179 96 366 1 77 189 50 • , B 132 f 155 190 121 . I IBER S.C. COUNTY RATINGS EMPLOYMENT IN TOP 20% 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 2 6 3 • 2 1 • 0 1 • 0 0 6 2 0 2 0 0 0 103 11 TtIO 35 131 1717 718 83 829 130 6 100 23 5 1 1097 135 18 1031 165 182 1125 163 318 231 381 10 552 10 65 39 3 2350 92 770 11 63)7 105 31 71 265 1017 image: ------- Executive Summary Table 3 (3) INDUSTRIES RANKED IN TOP 20% OF OSHA WEIGHTED INDEX (OHI) X H- H- SIC DESCR OWI OSHA RANK WC 1 Gil ID INDEX 2655 FIBER CANS. DRUMS 109 68.9 2819 IND INORGANIC CllfHS NEC 110 68.7 3713 TRUCK AND BUS BODIES III 66. 7 2841* TOILET PRCPAKAT IONS 112 68.5 2511 WOOD HOUSEHOLD FUHNIR 113 68.5 3589 SERVICE INUUSIRY HACH 1 1<« 68. l« 35<4'l SPECIAL DIES. TOOLS 115 67.9 7261 FUNERAL SERVICES 116 67.1 3085 REFRIC. IIFAING EQUIP 117 67.3 3552 TEXTILE HACIIINERV 118 66.9 1731 ELECIRICAL WOHK 119 66.7 3679 El ECTRONIC COMPONENTS 120 66.7 3535 CONVEYORS. CONVEYING 121 66.6 1791 SIRUCruRAL STEEI ERECT. 125 66.14 1793 GLASS. CLA2ING WORK 125 66. 1 i?9'i EXCAVATING. FOUNDATIONS 125 66. i 1795 WRECKING AND OEHOLI DON 125 66.1 1796 INSTALLING OLDG EQUIP 125 66. 4 1799 SPEC TRADE CONTRACTORS 125 66.1 5631 WOMEN'S ACCESSORY STORE 128 66.1 3931 MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS 129 66.1 2231 WEAVING. FINISHING WOOL 130 65.6 7391 RESEARCH fc DEVEL LADS 135 65. It 7392 MANAGEHENI. PUB ADMIN 135 65. 4 7393 OETECTV, PROTECTV SRV 135 65.1 7J9<4 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 135 65.1 7395 PHOIOFINISHING LADS 135 65. 1 7396 TRADING STAMP SERVICE 135 65.1 7397 COMMERCIAL TESTING LABS 135 65. 1 7399 BUSINESS SERVICES. NEC 135 65.1 36MI4 NONCURRENT-CAR. WIRING 139 65.1 NOTES: . NO DATA FOR IHIS SIC • RANKING IS IN THE TOP 20% OF ALL SICS •* THIS INDEX IS CALCULAIEO ONI Y TOR 3-DIGIT SICS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES; THEREFORE SICS 14931. 1(939 ALL HAVE THE SAME OSHA WEIGHTED INDEX. IRI RANK 1148 107 219 18 « 1«1 228 2*4 • f 70 * 167 129 131 321 389 . 330 t B 169 202 s 71 • t 0 . o • 333 307 IN NON- 1932 Ic i IBER RAT 1 NCS IN TOP 20% 0 1 " 1 • 2 1 1 • 2 t 2 0 1 0 2 0 f 2 1 0 2 t 0 0 0 0 t 0 0 . 0 0 0 S.C. COUNIY EMPLOYMENT 50 636 37 53 189 111 528 201 12 2 3171 23819 50 327 376 201 131 50 1331 73 122 f 11603 1199 2821 1165 1022 1735 7111 25 IRI - I NOUS)RIAL RISK INDEX IBER = INSPECTION-BASED EXPOSURE RATINGS image: ------- 4.2.5.5 High IBER Ranking with Low Employment in Santa Clara County. Combining all four composite IBER listings, we compiled a list of the top 75 SICs ranked hazardous overall by the IBER system (Executive Summary Table 4). Many of these SICs are given in Executive Summary Table I, but others did not meet the employment cut-off of 300, or else were not ranked in the top 20% of at least 3 of the 4 composite listings. Nonetheless, these industries have a history of high exposures to multiple substances. Local or state officials therefore need to consider this lest seriously when defining priorities and resource allocation even though the overall number of employees may be small. 4.2.5.6 Special Industries: Semiconductors (SIC 3674) and Hospitals (8062). SICs 3674 (Semiconductors and Related Devices) and 8062 (Hospitals) were included as highly ranked industries even though they were not ranked in the IRI and OWI nor did they have high rankings in the IBER. Both industries are large employers in the county, and use large numbers and quantities of toxic materials. In the case of the Semiconductor Industry, we believe the industry would have been ranked in the top 20% in the IRI or OWI rankings had NIOSH surveyed more worksites in this SIC as part of NOHS. In fact, only one firm in this SIC was included in NOHS. In the case of hospi- tals, recent reports of reproductive failure in personnel exposed to chemotherapeutic agents, relatively recent evidence of carcinogenicity from exposure to the widely used chemicals formaldehyde and ethylene oxide, and the as yet inadequately understood effects of various anesthetic gases all deflate the value of IRI and OWI rankings of hospitals (which are based on the 1974 NOHS) and argue for greater attention to this industry. A major problem with the NOHS data base for this particular project derives from its age. Much of the industry in Santa Clara County is new and, more importantly, reflects changing technology. The IRI and OWI ranking methods are most useful when listing industries which have not had major changes in chemical use during the past decade. 4.2.5.7 Small Employers Small employers constitute a particularly vexing problem. In Santa Clara County there are a number of SICs with a large number of employees and, based upon federal OSHA compliance data, a history of high exposures to potent chemicals, e.g., construc- tion, SICs 1711 (plumbing, heating, and air conditioning), 1721 (painting, paper hang- ing, and decorating), 1731 (electrical work), and 1799 (special trade contractors not elsewhere classified); and SIC 7699 (repair services not elsewhere classified). How- ever, in each SIC the number of establishments is also very large, which is indicative of small employers. We shall address this problem below in our recommendations. 4.2.6 Discussion The development of industry ranking schemes has not yet been discussed in the con- text of how the information is to be used in Santa Clara County. The six uses of information include: a) intervention, b) tracking of exposure or control of exposure over time, c) planning, d) research, e) as a complement to disease surveillance, and f) standard setting. -XXIV- image: ------- Executive Summary Table 4 75 INDUSIRIES WITH HiGMtST IBCR RANKS ALTCRNAIC HAZARD RANKINGS AND SC COUNTY EMPLOYMENT I X X SIC 3341 3/31 3691 37M3 1622 3321 3523 3362 3U79 3093 3331 2616 3253 2819 2821 3332 3M33 3792 3713 2851 3531 3732 3325 2879 3339 3M'I3 3361 3'l'll 3229 37I'I 3715 3269 3312 1761 2952 39 I 'I 1611 3*199 3533 369? 3M9M 3516 3b'l5 7699 33')9 3295 7216 J3i?2 J?92 26'.»9 INDUSTRY SECOND. NONFERROUS HCTALS SHIP BUILDING AND REPAIR STORAGE BAFTERICS RAILROAD EQUIPMENT BRIDGE. TUNNEL. EL. IIWYS GRAY IRON FOUNDRIES FARM MACHINERY AND EQPI BRASS fc COPPER FOUNDRIES HISC PLASTICS PRODUCTS SCRAP AND WASTE HATTER PRIMARY COPPER INORGANIC PIGMENTS CERAMIC WALL. H OOR TILE IND. INORG. CIIEMS NEC PLASTICS MATERIALS PRIMARY LEAD HEAT. EQUIP.. CXC. ELEC. TRAVEL TRAILERS TRUCK AND BUS BODIES PAINIS Ic AIM ED PRODS. CONSTRUCT ION MACHINERY BOAT RUIIDBNG AND REPAIR STEEL FOUNDRIES, NEC AGRICULTURAL CHEMICALS PRIM. NONFFR. METALS NEC FAORICAIED PIAIE WORK ALUMINUM FOUNDRIES FABRIC. STRUCTURAL METAL PRESSED ANU BLOWN GLASS MOTOR VEHICLE PARIS TRUCK TRAILERS POIIERY PRODUCTS. NEC BLAST FURN, STEEL MILLS ROOFING, SHEET METAL WRK ASPHALT FELTS * COATINGS SILVERWARE. PLATED WARE HIGHWAY Ic STREET CONSTR. FABRICATED METAL PRODS OIL FIELD MACHINERY PRIMARY BAHERIES VALVES fc PIPE FITTINGS HOISTS. CRANIS. MONORAIL ELECTRIC LAMPS PRIFAIIRIC. METAL HI DOS MACHINE TOOL ACCESSORIES IIEPAIR SERVICES. NIC PRIM. HLIAL f'HOWJCIS NEC MINIRALS. CIINI) OR TREAT. UHY CLEANING CLANIS MALLCAIILt I RON lOUNORICS ASOFSIOS PRODUCTS OIIMICAL PltrPARAI IONS n«n:n. sinuc. CI_AV IILE PHIMARV f ft t4f~. IBER RANK i 1 2 3 M 5 6 7 a 9 10 II 12 13 15 15 16 17 18 19 21 21 22 23 2M 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 3 '1 36 36 37 38 39 MO Ml M3 Ml 'l5 H6 M7 MS H9 50 51 53 51 OWI $ RANK 383 M • 33 • 31 • 157 32 • 232 231 286 395 6MM 322 f 110 • MM • t 30M 35 • 111 • Ml • 12 • 93 • 3 • f 209 13 " 78 • 18 « B 15M 29 " 2 • 160 79 • 1M8 , 399 88 • 199 221 M9M 219 85 • 27 « 92 • 229 562 37 • 22% B95 29 r IRI RANK 69 319 270 335 87 29 107 12 1MO 219 M 379 96 170 296 260 305 306 M9 39 182 272 192 356 188 100 250 285 235 60 179 28'l I2M 3'i9 2M2 5J Jl«8 SC COUNTY EMPLOYMENT 80 22 180 330 22 172 67 2888 372 77 636 303 90 21 37 189 197 39 3 1008 35 109 182 712 307 290 5 27 39M 1M25 19 7 968 552 1M M6 133 8 2MB i| 38U 10H 3 65 67 751 1O 66 96 image: ------- txecutive nummary (able 4 (2) 75 INDUSTRIES WITH HIGHEST IBCR RANKS WITH ALTERNATE HA/ARD RANKINGS AND SC COUNTV EMPLOYMENT I X X SIC INDUSTRY 3315 SICCL WIRE It RCL. PRODS 3511 SPECIAL DIES. TOOLS 320') CLAV RCrRACIORICS 3398 HEIAL HEAI TREATING 2295 COATED FABRICS. NOT RUB. 3356 NONFER. ROLL.. DRAW. NEC 362'! CARBON It CRAPIIIIC PRODS 3730 SHIP. BOAT DLDG ft RPRG 3221 CLASS CONIAINLHS 3537 IND. TRUCKS ft TRACTORS 3'l79 HEIAL COATING 3585 REFRIC. ft HEAT. EQUIP. 5961 HAIL ORDER HOUSES 3XM HETAL CANS 356? BALL ft ROLLER BEARINGS 1911 ELECTRIC SIRVICES 3569 CEN. IND. MACHINERY NEC 2fl'll SOAP ft OMIEK DEIEKGENIS 3321 STEEL INVEST. FOUNDRIES 333>l PRIMARY ALUMINUM 2661 BLOC PAPER ft BOARD HILLS NOTES: . NO DATA FOR THIS SIC • RANKING IS IN THE 10P 20% OF ALL SICS IRER = INSPECTION BASED EXPOSURE RATINGS OWI = OSIIA WEIGHTED INDEX IRI = INDUSTRIAL RISK INDEX IDER RANK 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 6'l 65 66 67 69 69 70 71 73 73 7<4 75 OWI RANK 16 image: ------- 4.2.6.1 Intervention. Where an exposure is determined to be excessive, such that violation of standards exist or there is documented illness, intervention by appropriate authorities is highly relevant. The possible intervening agencies in Santa Clara County include CAL/OSHA, NIOSH, Department of Health Services (HESIS and Epiderniologic Studies Unit), and the Occupational Health Section within the Santa Clara County Health Department. For these agencies the approach to industry ranking may be different from one using the information for other purposes, e.g., research. Industries which have substantial employment in the county and a history of high measured exposures should have the highest priority for follow-up and resource allocation. Industries which rank high in the IBERS or have documented high exposures to particular agents should be given the highest priority by the intervening agency. Even industries which are small employers may require a high priority if excessive exposures are anticipated. Where the potentially important SIC is made up of a large number of small employers the intervention may be conducted in two phases, a problem identification phase followed by an extensive education campaign or a requirement for environmental and biological monitoring. Those industries high in the OWI or IRI but having low measured exposures would not be a high priority for an intervention agency. For example, CAL/OSHA's compliance effort is not likely to have a major impact on industries in which the measured expo- sure levels are low. The semiconductor industry is an obvious case in point. Regula- tory agencies generally are guided by their promulgated standards and have less flexi- bility in circumstances where the measured exposures are low. 4.2.6.2 Tracking of exposures over time. All the approaches developed for ranking industry are appropriate here, and all the agencies previously defined will have an interest in this category. Presumably CAL/OSHA or the county has the lead in establishing baseline conditions, i.e. deter- mining the degree of exposure in a particular industry at a particular time. No agency has the resources to continually monitor exposures in each industry with sus- pected problems over time and that is why CAL/OSHA conducts spot checks, inspections, on an ongoing basis. Unfortunately, that approach leaves great gaps in the data available. The burden for ongoing monitoring could be undertaken by the affected establishments. CAL/OSHA or Santa Clara County could establish requirements for envi- ronmental monitoring by industry or by specific chemical. Such rules would spell out the chemicals required to be monitored, the levels at which monitoring needs to be initiated, e.g., at some "action level", reporting requirements, and other provisions which enable the tracking of chemical exposure over time while placing limited burdens on the affected industries. Under such a program, industries would have to report use of certain chemicals limited to those with significant toxicity, e.g., lead, silica, and carcinogens, and report the monitoring results to the agency. A major role of regulatory bodies would then be to review the monitoring results and do spot checks on the adequacy of the monitoring programs. 4.2.6.3 Planning. The agencies involved in planning are very wide ranging and include CAL/OSHA, Department of Health Services, Santa Clara County Health Department, local planning agencies, hospitals, clinics etc. Planning can include assessing clinical services available to handle a catastrophic event, such as a chemical explosion or uncontrolled -xxvii- image: ------- release, emergency room capability, planning of health services within an industry, e.g., medical screening, biological monitoring, and routine medical capability, to resource allocation and the planning of inspection priorities by CAL/OSHA. The role of the county in the planning to address catastrophes and accidents is especially important. The industry ranking schemes which focus on industries with a history of high exposures are relevant to all agencies involved in health planning. However, the limitations of the data bases are such that we do not believe that the ranking systems defined here are as yet adequate for a systematic approach to health care planning. This area requires specific follow-up subsequent to this report. Specific planning around crisis intervention, emergency room facilities, and response to catastrophic events deserves special attention given that certain industries use large quantities of highly toxic materials. 4.2.6.4 Research. The principal agencies concerned with conducting research in workplace settings are NIOSH, Department of Health Services, the Northern and Southern Occupational Health Centers, and to a limited extent, CAL/OSHA. The relevance of the ranking schemes to researchers depends on the nature of the specific research objective. Identification of industries with significant exposures to regulated chemicals with well-known health effects may be of little interest to the researcher whose goal is to discover new etiologic relationships in industries with excess morbidity or mortality. On the other hand, use of the NIOSH NOHS data, to identify unregulated chemicals for research purposes, may be of particular value. Therefore, the IRI and OWI rankings may have special significance to the researcher. Data from the OSHA MIS does have relevance to the researcher who is assessing the adequacy of a particular standard insofar as he/she wishes to study exposures below the current standards. For example, an industry with a history of exposures to particular solvents at levels below the OSHA standard may be an important environment in which to study the long term CNS effects of low level exposure. The utility of the rankings for the researcher there- fore ultimately depend on the specific research hypothesis. 4.2.6.5 Complement to Disease Surveillance. Rankings which focus on "specific chemicals" as opposed to multiple exposures are most appropriate here. Identification of industries with a history of exposure to lead represents a good example of the use of the ranking systems in combination with disease surveillance/biological monitoring programs. 4.2.6.6 Standard setting. Use of the OSHA MIS data to estimate the number of workers exposed to a particular substance and to assess the magnitude of that exposure are two important aspects of standard setting. Use of the information to identify populations at risk below the standard also represent an important application of the information. The NOHS based information has utility here insofar as it identifies user populations not identified by the OSHA MIS and may be used to provide estimates of the number of workers exposed to a particular chemical. CAL/OSHA would be the prime user of ranking methods for standard setting purposes. -xxviii- image: ------- 4.3 Identification of Hazardous Industries from CAL/OSHA Citation and Inspection Data Since the actual exposure information derived from CAL/OSHA inspections is not computerized, a similar approach to that described for the development of the IBERS using federal data could not be constructed. CAL/OSHA does computerize general infor- mation on its inspections and resulting citations, however, and we requested such a tape for Santa Clara County. A review of citations was conducted to determine where overexposures to chemical agents had been identified in the county during the period 1979-1984. CAL/OSHA compliance inspections in Santa Clara County resulted in 13 citations for worker overexposure to chemical agents during 1979-84. The specific chemicals cited and the SICs are identified in Executive Summary Table 5. During this period, viola- tions of numerous standards were cited, but those listed represent the only overexpo- sures identified. We were also able to use the data available to focus a review of specific company case files, for more detailed analysis of particularly important industries in the country. These data are presented in the industry profiles, summarized below. 4.4 Profiles of Selected Industries In addition to our analysis of all Santa Clara County industries with over 300 employees using the IRI, OWI, and IBER computerized ranking systems, we selected six industries for more detailed review. These industries were selected because 1) they had very significant employment in the county, and 2) there were strong indications that potential or actual exposure problems existed in these industries. These indica- tions took different forms. In some cases, the industry had ranked high in one or more of the computerized ranking systems; in others, an industry firm had been cited for violations of CAL/OSHA exposure limits. In two cases (Hospitals and Semiconduc- tors) the IRI and OWI rankings were not thought to reflect the current knowledge regarding hazards used in these industries. We also felt that regardless of ranks, the materials used and atypical use conditions in these industries merited further analysis. The industries profiled included Semiconductors and Related Devices (SIC 3674), Electronic Components not elsewhere classified (SIC 3674), Miscellaneous Plastics Products (SIC 3079), Electroplating (SIC 3479), General Medical and Surgical Hospitals (SIC 8062), and Tank and Tank Components (SIC 3795, a SIC represented by one company FMC corporation). These industries together employ approximately 102,000 persons or roughly 16% of the total Santa Clara County workforce. In these more detailed analyses, we were able to incorporate data which were not available in a suitably automated form for comparing the entire spectrum of indus- tries. These data included monitored exposure levels from CAL/OSHA inspectors, NIOSH Health Hazard Evaluations (HHE's), and California Division of Labor Statistics and Research (DLSR) occupational .illness statistics. Summaries of the findings contained in the six industry profiles are given below. -XXIX- image: ------- Executive Summary Table 5 Worker Overexposure Citations in Santa Clara County from CAL/OSHA Inspection Files 1979-84 SIC Company Standard Violated Substance * Inspec Year 2649 Tag Industries Inc. 2879 Moyer Chemical Co. 3522 FMC Airline Equip. Div, 367 ** Powell Electronics 3842 Hosmer Dorrance 5161 Jones Chemical Co. 8062 Santa Teresa Community Hospital 5141(a) 5155(b) 3272 Sakrete 5141(a) 3296 Owens Corning Fiberglass 5141(b) 341 ** Lorentz Barrel & Drum 5155(c) 3489 FMC Ordnance Division 5155(b) 5155(b) 5141(a) 5155(c) 5155(c) 5141(a) 5141(c) 5155(c) nuisance dust 1963 parathion, methyl 1979 parathion silica 1982 silica 1980 solvent mixture 1981 total dust, 1980 alum, welding fume nuisance dust 1980 trichloroethylene 1982 trichloroethylene 1981 phosgene, hydrogen 1982 chloride gas formaldehyde 1981 * 5141 • Control of Harmful Exposure to Employees 5155 - Airborne Contaminants ** no 4-digit SIC code available -xxx- image: ------- 4.4.1 Semiconductors and Related Devices (SIC 3674). The semiconductor industry employes 52,187 persons in the county, or about 8% of the county's workforce. The majority of workers (85%) are employed in large firms, i.e., with 250 or more employers. The Semiconductor industry did not rank high in any of the three ranking systems used, though as noted above, the IRI and OWI systems were rendered irrelevant due to inadequate inclusion of this industry in the NOHS (only one firm being surveyed). How- ever, the more recent National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES), along with two studies performed on this industry, the 1981 CAL/OSHA Semiconductor Industry Study and the 1980-81 NIOSH Hazard Assessment of the Electronic Component Manufacturing Indus- try, reveal an extensive list of hazardous substances used in various industry pro- cesses, including large quantities of solvents, acids, toxic gases (arsine, phosphine, diborane), and other substances. Actual exposure levels found in OSHA inspections (1981-83), eight NIOSH Health Hazard Evaluations, four NIOSH Control Technology reports, and twenty CAL/OSHA inspec tion records for firms in SIC 3674 were reviewed, along with the 1981 CAL/OSHA study and some industry monitoring data obtained from the Semiconductor Industry-Associa- tion, a trade group. (The OSHA data and most of the NIOSH reports neglected firms outside of California.) Together these sources represented thousands of exposure samples. While these samples contained some instances of overexposure, on the whole exposures were well below the established limits. However, worker health complaints such as irritation of mucous membranes, burns, respiratory distress and light-headedness were found in five of the eight Health Hazard Evaluations reviewed. Both the 1981 CAL/OSHA study and an article based on the NIOSH Control Technology studies expressed concern over potential arsenic exposure from ion-implantation operations, especially during maintenance. Federal OSHA and industry data showed some exposures at or near the PEL for lead. Also, data from the California Division of Labor Statistics and Research showed that in 1983 and 1984, the proportion of Employer's Reports of Occupational Injury and Illness (which record occupational illness resulting in one or more lost work days) for SIC 3674 in Santa Clara County was 1.4 to 1.5 times higher than the industry's proportion of the county's total employment. Most illnesses recorded for the industry were due to acids or unspecified chemical compounds. Few epidemiological studies of this industry exist. One study (Sorahan, Waterhouse, McKiernan, et al., 1985) showed an excess of malignant melanoma in semiconductor workers in Great Britain, though no occupational cause was found. These findings, combined with the dynamic character of the industry, the limita- tions of current monitoring or illness reporting systems for capturing certain poten- tial problems (e.g. chronic low level solvent exposure), and the potential for catas- trophic accidents due to explosive gases lead us to recommend further assessment of the industry, as described in the recommendations section below. 4.4.2 Electronic Components not elsewhere classified (SIC 3679) SIC 3679 is the third largest industrial classification in Santa Clara County, with a total employment of 23,849. SIC 3679 is a very heterogenous classification, but is dominated by printed circuit board manufacture in the county. Most worke'rs are employed by firms with less than 250 workers. -xxxi- image: ------- This SIC does not rank at all high (bottom 50%) in the IBER system of industry hazard ranking, based on actual exposure levels found by federal OSHA, nor were any overexposures found in the fifteen CAL/OSHA inspection records reviewed. However, the nature of the hazards used, particularly lead compounds, acids, chromium, and sol- vents, placed it within the top 20% in the OWI rankings, and OSHA inspection data did disclose occasional overexposures to lead, manganese, mercury, and other substances. Moreover, anecdotal evidence from two NIOSH Health Hazard Evaluations suggests a potential for toxic solvent exposures related to degreasing operations, and occupational illness data from the Division of Labor Statistics and Research indicate that acute hazards are a significant and continuing source of worker illness in this industry. These indications, combined with the significant contribution of the industry to Santa Clara County employment make a case for further attention to this industry. Such attention may be especially warranted insofar as the demographic distribution of the industry in favor of small firms (less than 50 workers) makes it difficult for complaint-driven inspections alone to assess adequately the full range of establish- ments in the industry. Indeed, the fragmented nature of SIC 3679 may recommend it as a worthwhile focus for the County Health Department and local communities through the Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinances. According to administrators of the City of Santa Clara's ordinance, printed circuit board manufacturers presently comprise a large component of the city's registered users of hazardous materials; this may be the case in other communities as well. Review of hazardous materials storage listings could confirm the nature and quantity of hazardous materials used in given areas by the industry, and suggest further avenues of inquiry. 4.4.3 Miscellaneous Plastics Products (SIC 3079) SIC 3079 employs 2,888 persons in Santa Clara County, all of whom work in firms with fewer than 250 workers. The industry ranked very high (36th out of 475, or in the top 89%) in the IBER ranking system, based on actual exposures from OSHA inspec- tions. (This rank is for chronic hazards only; if acute hazards are factored into rankings, the industry ranks 9th, or in the top 2%.) Among substances contributing to the high rank were lead, chromic acid, MEK, MOCA, phenol, styrene, and various other substances. In contrast, SIC 3079 ranked in the top 25% using the IRI system, and in the bottom 50% in the OWI system, both ranks based on potential exposures from NIOSH survey data. In addition to the overexposures shown in federal OSHA data, fifteen NIOSH Health Hazard Evaluations (HHE's) reviewed disclosed numerous miscellaneous health com- plaints, and three HHE's found overexposures to a total of five substances, including styrene. High employment and documented exposure problems in the industry make this SIC an important Santa Clara County occupational health focus. The problem of small firms in this industry, like in SIC 3679, may be amenable to local efforts through Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinances and the County Health Department. 4.4.4 Electroplating (SIC 3471) SIC 3471 employs 1,034 persons in Santa Clara County, with 60% working in shops with less than 50 workers. -XXXll- image: ------- Due to the presence of solvents, toxic metals, acids, silica, asbestos, and vari- ous other hazards, this- industry ranked 76th and of 549 industries in the OWI ranking system, or within the top 14% of OWI hazardous industries. The industry ranked 123rd (out of 412 industries • ranked), or in the top 30%, in IRI rankings. Federal OSHA inspection data showed overexposures to nine substances, including lead arsenate, silica, chromates, and trichloroethylene. Based on these data, SIC 3471 ranked 98th out of 475 industries ranked, or just outside the top 20% of IBER hazardous industries. Data from Employer's Reports of Occupational Injury and Illness showed very few reports (8 each in 1983 and 1984) for this industry; however this fig- ure is still 3 1/2 times what would be expected given the industry's proportion of total employment in the county. The great potential for exposure to highly toxic materials for a large number of workers in this industry, as indicated by the high OWI rank, the documented overexpo- sures nationally, shown by the federal OSHA data and the fairly high IBER rank, and high employment in the county make this an important industry for further analysis. 4.4.5 General Medical and Surgical Hospitals (SIC 8062) This industry is one of the ten largest in Santa Clara County, employing 14,272 people, most of whom work in hospitals with over 250 employees. SIC 8062 was not included in IRI rankings. The OWI ranking (for 3-digit SIC 806; 4-digit ranking not available) was quite low (248th out of 549 rankings), and the IBER ranking was also low (top 38% if acute hazards are included and bottom 50% if only chronic hazards are used). Though the industry received low IBER ranks, federal OSHA inspection data from 26 inspections between 1979 and 1982 revealed overexposures to five chemicals, including formaldehyde. Of CAL/OSHA inspection records reviewed, encompassing twelve inspections among five Santa Clara County hospitals, only one hospital was cited (twice) for over- exposures, also to formaldehyde. Despite the absence of high hazard ranks or consistent exposure patterns in SIC 8062, there are special considerations in assessing this industry. New toxicological information has emerged since the NOHS in 1974 on many specific hazards found in hos- pitals, particularly with regard to the potential carcinogenic effects of the steril- ant gases ethylene oxide and formaldehyde, and reproductive effects associated with alkylating agents, hormones, antineoplastic drugs, and other drugs, for which detect- able air levels have been found during dose preparation. This emerging literature, combined with the industry's high county employment and some past evidence of actual overexposures indicate the merits of continued evaluation of this industry. 4.4.6 FMC Corporation (SIC 3795) FMC Corporation is a large multi-product corporation with three units in Santa Clara County, the International Division, the Ordinance Division, and the Defense Sys- tems Headquarters. These units manufacture military vehicles and conduct research on defense technology. We have classified FMC Corporation operations in the county as SIC 3795, tank manufacture. This SIC was not included in any of the rankings due to insufficient data. -XXXlll- image: ------- FMC Corporation employs just over 1% of the workers in the county (6,680 employees). These workers are exposed to a variety of toxic substances, including potential carcinogens, solvents, respiratory sensitizers (MDI), and metals. CAL/OSHA and NIOSH monitoring data disclose instances of high exposure concentrations over sev- eral years, particularly in welding operations. The CAL/OSHA monitoring data is espe- cially significant in light of the very limited number of actual PEL violations found by CAL/OSHA in Santa Clara County, in any SIC, between 1979 and 1984. The large worker population, the use of toxic substances involved, and the history of high expo- sures at FMC argue the need for continued scrutiny of worker exposures by FMC and CAL/OSHA. -xxxiv- image: ------- 5. Recommendations The recommendations in this report are classified into three categories: a) Improvement of the available data bases and data collection. b) High priority industries for further investigation. c) Research needs in particular industries. 5.1. Recommended Improvements in Data Collection and Use This subsection contains specific recommendations for adapting existing data gathering programs in ways which could enhance surveillance of occupational exposure and related disease outcomes by helping to create viable linkages between them. Suggestions will be made concerning the utilization of demographic and exposure data. 5.1.1 Demographic Data Recommendations 5.1.1.1 EDD should allow access to "confidential" data. A cooperative relationship should be initiated between the Employment Development Department (EDD) and relevant agencies to allow access to an industry-occupation matrix, along with related growth projections. The ability to use data gathered by EDD is essential if an adequate occupational health surveillance system is to be developed. We are not entirely aware of the basis of the EDD confidentiality requirements, i.e., whether they are required by legislative mandate or are matters of state policy. Whatever the basis of the requirement, relief should be sought in order that the information be available to other state agencies. Selection of either the Occupational Employment Survey (OES) survey matrix or the Census-based matrix should take into consideration the population sub-groups to be targeted for educational and/or enforcement activities, since the two matrices encompass different populations. The Census-based matrix includes self-employed persons but excludes second jobs, while the OES survey includes second jobs but excludes railroad workers, domestic workers as well as workers in agriculture, education and hospitals. Such a matrix could be progressively "filled in" as applicable exposure and disease data are developed. Knowing the proportional occupational breakdown within industries would help in utilizing data which are by occupation only. Knowing the projected growth trends would also assist in identifying industries and occupations expected to expand. In addition to the obvious convenience, a ready-made matrix obtained from EDD would have several significant advantages over one constructed from other sources: it would be more accurate, more up-to-date, and more valid at the local level in any California county than national data bases. -xxxv- image: ------- 5.1.1.2. CAL/OSHA should adopt industry ranking approaches. In addition to computerizing exposure data from compliance inspections, CAL/OSHA should consider adopting the methods described in the report as one of the bases for scheduling inspections as well as developing other approaches to scheduling. 5.1.1.3. Hazard Surveillance should be part of DIR and DOHS efforts. The Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) and the Department of Health Services (DOHS) need to give greater attention to the implementation of hazard and health surveillance systems. The current system of priority setting which relies on the individual worker or union for ascertaining if a health hazard exists—while important—is not entirely satisfactory for priority setting purposes. That is, compliance activity by CAL/OSHA has historically been driven by jemployee complaints even in the health area, where workers are not necessarily knowledgeable about the hazards they face, and where and where information alone may not suffice. Relying on worker-initiated complaints or requests is important in the overall attempt to protect the state's working population; the state also needs to develop a more sophisticated surveillance system so that scientists and health professionals can use their expertise to establish occupational health priorities. We propose that the state consider different approaches to setting occupational health priorities which will be based upon the implementation of a comprehensive hazard and health surveillance system. These new approaches would have the effect of broadening the data bases available for surveillance purposes. 5.1.1.4 Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinance Data should be expanded and computerized. EPA, the State of California, the County of Santa Clara and the local municipalities need to review the lack of computerization of the information gathered under hazardous materials ordinances. Passage of local ordinances which provide for collection of information on the location and use of toxic chemicals represents important legislation, but failure to implement those rules and lack of computerization render the statutes relatively useless. Local agencies should ensure all relevant data are collected, such as SIC, to ensure the data are useful for surveillance purposes. Coordination between the task force developing the statewide approach and the IEMP is essential. 5.1.1.5 Health outcome data deserves analysis in a separate study. This report has used information on chemical hazards and exposures to rank industry for purposes of follow-up. A similar study should be conducted which evaluates information from health outcome, disease surveillance, epidemiological studies and injury and illness reporting schemes to rank industries according to their potential for having occupational health problems. This study would presumably identify weaknesses in available data bases as well as identifying populations at risk. Careful attention needs to be given to methods for evaluating anecdotal reports of illness and injury. An evaluation of health outcome data for Santa Clara County would focus and narrow the issues to be addressed. Some deficiencies in current data bases or data sources related to health outcomes are noted in this report (Section 2 and Appendix 10), and include lack of industry and occupation variables in disease surveillance systems. -xxxvi- image: ------- 5.1.2 Exposure Data Recommendations 5.1.2.1 CAL/OSHA should computerize exposure monitoring results. Inasmuch as CAL-OSHA exposure records represent the only actual measured exposures on a local level, CAL-OSHA should computerize and tabulate these sampling results by SIC in a manner similar to and comparable with the OSHA MIS System. The specific substances encountered and their airborne concentrations should be computerized by four digit SIC code. In addition, occupation and specific job title information should be computerized for each sample taken. This represents one of our most important recommendations and will have implications for research, for targeting inspections, special studies and data-based educational efforts. Our inability to obtain CAL-OSHA exposure information represented one most vexing problem in this study. 5.1.2.2. The number of substances requiring user registration should be expanded. Consideration should also be given to establishing reporting requirements by industry for certain specific noncarcinogenic substances. Registration of use is currently required for regulated carcinogens under the Occupational Cancer Control Act. Additional chemical agents such as lead, other metals, silica, solvents and other recognized toxic agents should also require reporting. The list of carcinogens which require reporting should also be expanded to include chemicals identified by the National Toxicology Program and the International Agency for Research on Cancer. 5.1.2.3 CAL/OSHA should obtain employer-collected monitoring data. CAL/OSHA should consider promulgating standards requiring employers to conduct environmental monitoring, and where appropriate, biological monitoring for specific agents with recognized toxicity. CAL/OSHA should collect these data on a periodic basis and they should be computerized. This information would then form the basis for ongoing surveillance of chemical hazards. This recommendation is most appropriately implemented at the statewide level by CAL/OSHA. The Santa Clara County Health Department could also consider adopting monitoring requirements. 5.2. Highest Priority Industries Recommendations. The industries found in Executive Summary Table 1 are those industries which our approaches to ranking have identified as having the greatest potential for workplace exposures. These industries may require further evaluation to assess a) whether significant exposures exist, b) whether there are health problems associated with workplace exposures, and c) which agencies and approaches are most appropriate to assess the potential for exposure. In some instances additional research is required, e.g. the semiconductor industry (SIC 3674), whereas compliance activity is most appropriate where there is a plausible belief that excessive exposures are occurring. The data in other tables on industries ranking high in IBERS, OWI, IRI, and employment are also worthy of review. Finally, the professional judgement of occupational health professionals in the county will be extremely important in reviewing these lists. -xxxvii- image: ------- Persons familiar with the industry in the county may be able to review these rankings and provide valuable insight regarding research and compliance priorities. 5.2.1 Small Employers. There are numerous industries identified in this report which have a history of high exposures to specific chemicals but which are generally small or which have no fixed location. Examples include SICs 1611 (Highway and Street Construction), 1761 Roofing and Sheet Metal Contractors), 3479 (Metal Coating and Allied Services), 3499 (Fabricated Metal Products), 3544 (Special Dies, Tools, Jigs, and Fixtures), 3679 (Electronic Components not elsewhere classified), 7216 (Dry Cleaning Plants) and 7699 (Repair Services not elsewhere classified). All the above industries are in the top 20% of the IBER ranking, employ over 500 people in Santa Clara County, consist overwhelmingly of firms with under 50 employees, and have over half their total workforce employed in such firms. Those industries with a large total employment base and a large number of establishments, especially those with no fixed location (e.g. SIC 1761) require a significantly different approach than a large employer with a single fixed location. This problem is clearly not unique to Santa Clara county. CAL/OSHA should consider a meeting or conference on approaches to small industry which would of necessity include health educators, health care providers to a particular geographic area, industry and labor representatives, in order to develop a comprehensive strategy on small business. Our analysis suggests that there have been very high exposures to highly toxic materials identified in these industries and they identified in firms in these industries and they should not be excluded because of their size. 5.3. Recommendations for Special Research Related to the Semiconductor Industry (SIC 3674). 5.3.1 Background. The electronic component manufacturing industry is a focus of our recommendations for research for the following reasons: a) The electronics industry is very large in Santa Clara County and it is anticipated that the industry will continue to grow in the future. b) The vast majority of other industries in Santa Clara County are amenable to the intervention and surveillance activities of CAL/OSHA and the County of Santa Clara. Most of the industries employ many fewer people and the problems are reasonably well recognized. c) The electronics industry has the potential to be a model of preventive occupational health practice which could affect the development of occupational health programs in other newly developing or rebuilding industries. Some of the approaches taken already by the larger industries represent important innovations in occupational health management. -XXXVlll- image: ------- d) As a rapidly changing industry with a high degree of technological innovation there is always the concern that new techniques for manufacturing may have the potential for significant health problems. Constant surveillance and research therefore is an important element in assessing potential problems. e) There is oft expressed public concern about the potential for accidents and numerous anecdotal reports of illness, especially associated with solvent exposure, acid and base exposure, arsenic exposure, toxic gas use, epoxy resins and cellosolves in the electronics industry. There have been particular concerns raised around reproductive toxicity. In our view, there need to be hazard and illness surveillance systems established which address these concerns and anecdotal reports. Further research to assess the scope and magnitude of these potential problems is appropriate. The development of this industrial base is very important to the county and significant effort needs to occur to develop the most progressive approaches to hazard control such that public and worker concerns are addressed and that existing problems are dealt with systematically in both the short and long term. 5.3.2 Semiconductor Industry Recommendations. 5.3.2.1 The county health department should attempt to initiate epidemiological studies of the semiconductor industry, perhaps in cooperation with health care providers or appropriate federal and state agencies. Epidemiological studies designed to assess the risks due to chemical exposure in electronics industry SICs, perhaps in cooperation with Kaiser or other health care providers should be considered. The County may wish to request research studies from NIOSH, the Occupational Health Centers or the Department of Health Services. From an epidemiologic standpoint there is little to no data available on the problems facing workers in these industries. 5.3.2.2 Neurobehavioral screening should be used to assess solvent exposure effects. Neurobehavioral screening studies designed to assess the impact of solvent exposure on the central nervous system in solvent exposed workers should be considered. We received numerous anecdotal reports from physicians, industrial hygienists and workers themselves on neurobehavioral problems associated with solvent exposure. Since exposure levels are generally well within standards in these industries, there is concern that current standards may be inadequate or that significant dermal exposure may be occurring. Numerous industries throughout the U.S. have solvent exposure problems and therefore the selection of the most appropriate cohort is an important methodological issue. In our view, neurotoxicology and neuroepidemiology of the solvents used in these industries represents an important, unresolved research issue. 5.3.2.3 The county should research means of addressing chemical burns in the industry. Chemical burns account for a significant proportion of physicians' first reports of injury in this industry. Further research on the control, minimization, and treatment of -xxxix- image: ------- chemical burns should be an area of follow-up by the county. 5.3.2.4 Biological monitoring requirements should be considered for this industry. Review of the chemicals used in the industry should be conducted for the express purpose of identifying whether any biological monitoring requirements should be considered specifically for this industry. 5.3.2.5 Toxicological mechanisms of Cellosolve solvents and exposure levels of these solvents in the semiconductor industry require further study. Cellosolve solvents used in the industry have raised concerns among electronics workers and their advocates. The reproductive toxicity of "cellosolves" does not appear to derive from mutagenicity or other irreversible biological processes. Further research by NIOSH needs to be conducted on the mechanism of the reproductive toxicity of these compounds with particular attention being given to the establishment of safe levels of exposure. In this regard, additional characterization of exposure levels in this industry is appropriate. A joint effort between NIOSH, CAL/OSHA and the County would be conducted. The cellosolves have low vapor pressures, and therefore attention should be focused on the prevention of skin contact. Substitution of a less toxic solvent would be an appropriate, even preferred, approach to the control of Cellosolve exposure. If it is determined that substitution is not viable, then the State of California needs to consider how to address reproductive toxins especially as a matter of policy. There are currently no guidelines at the state or federal level on approaches to the regulation of reproductive toxins. 5.3.2.6 Assiduous exposure monitoring is critical and should include maintenance, cleanup, and repair operations. Our recommendations for the requirement for environmental monitoring with subsequent reporting and computerization by state or local agencies of the data are appropriate to certain chemicals in use in these industries, e.g., arsenic, cellosolves and other solvents. Monitoring of exposures during maintenance, cleanup, and repair operations is particularly relevant. This would appear to be especially true in a highly complex industry of this type where acute exposures are possible during equipment failure. Continuous monitoring of arsenic levels would appear to be a high priority. 5.3.2.7 Research into toxic exposures from ion-implantation processes should continue. Ion-implantation processes also require further research of the type described by Ungers et al, Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., 46(8), 416-420 (1985). 5.3.2.8 Santa Clara County should address anecdotal reports of illness in the industry. Exposure levels to toxic chemicals in these industries tend to be very low when they are measured, but nonetheless there are numerous anecdotal reports of illness. There have been often stated concerns that acute exposures during accidental releases may have had important health consequences. We recommend the Santa Clara Department of -xl- image: ------- Health take the lead role in evaluating the existence and severity of these reports. The County should attempt to involve the clinical community in the County, including the occupational medicine clinic of the Valley Medical Center. Health care providers represent an important resource for identification and clinical evaluation of illness; in IEMP Phase 2, a concerted effort should be made to involve this important segment of the Community. Representatives from industry, the Santa Clara Department of Health, health care providers, and NIOSH should develop a mechanism for tracking possible work related complaints to confirm the accuracy of the anecdotal reports. 5.3.2.9 Industry and local agencies must continue to assess the potential for catastrophic accidents. An assessment of the potential for catastrophic events associated with toxic chemical explosions, leaks or spills is not within the scope of this report. However, the issue of chemical storage, chemical use (amounts), emergency response planning, and other related issues should be the focus of further study. We were impressed with the efforts of some of the large electronics employers in the county in this area, but we believe a comprehensive evaluation including both large and small employers is important. -xli- image: ------- LIST OF FIGURES 2-1 Functional Chart of the CM/OSHA Program 14 2-2 Functional Chart of the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health 15 2-3 California Division of Occupational Safety and Health Field Operations in Northern California: County Boundaries for Regions I and H 17 5.1-1 Steps in Semiconductor Wafer Fabrication 90 -xlii- image: ------- LIST OF TABLES 4-1 Inspections and Test Samples in OSHA Inspection Data: SIC 2812 Alkalies and Chlorine ................................................ 51 4-2 Comparison of NIOSH and OSHA Industry Indexes Using NOHS for Exposure Data [[[ 53 4-3 Coiparison of Top Ranked SIC's in OSHA Weighted Index (CWI) and NIOSH's Industrial Risk Index (IKE) .................................. 54 4-4 Exanples of SIC's with High Ranks in Inspection-Based Exposure Rankings (IBER's) [[[ 55 4-5 Santa dara County Industries Ranked by Employment (>300) with CWI, IRI, and IBER Hazard Rankings ................................... 57 4-6 Seventy-five Industries with Highest IBER Ranks, with Alternate Hazard Rankings and Santa Clara County Enployment .................... 62 4-7 Industries Not Inclined in High IBER Ranking with High Exposures for Selected Substances .............................................. 66 4-8 Industries Ranked in Top 20% of Industrial Risk Index (IKE) .......... 68 4-9 Industries Ranked in Top 20% of OSHA Weighted Index (CWI) ............ 70 4-10 Worker Overexposure Citations in Santa Clara County, from CAL/OSHA Inspection Files 1979-84 .................................... 75 4-11 Industries Ranked Potentially Hazardous in Santa Clara County by Federal OSHA/NIOSH Data paggg ..................................... 77 4-12 Substances Contributing to High IBER Ranks for Selected SIC ' s ........ 79 5.1-1 NIOSH National Exposure Survey (NOES) as of January 17, 1986 for SIC 3674 , Sardconductors and Related Devices ......................... 91 5.1-2 Potential Occupational Exposures and Exposure Situations in the Semiconductor Industry, as Identified by the CAL/OSHA Semicon- ductor Industry Study, 1981 ............ '. ............................. 99 5.1-3 A List of Cannon Materials Used or Generated in the Manufac- ture of Semiconductors ............................................... 100 5.1-4 Federal OSHA Semiconductor Industry Inspections: Substances with Sample Exposures at or Above 50% of the OSHA EEL ..................... 106 5.1-5 Substances Monitored in Eight NIOSH HHE's for SIC 3674, 1977-85 ...... 108 5.1-6 CAL/OSHA Semiconductor Industry, 1981: Substances with Monitored Overexposur image: ------- 5.1-7 CAL/OSHA Monitoring Data from Inspections of Ten Santa Clara County Finns, 1979-84 112 5.2-1 OSHA Top Ranked Substances in NCHS Inventory by Weighted Index: SIC 3679, Electronic Conponents 120 5.2-2 NIOSH National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES) as of January 17, 1986 for SIC 3679, Electronic Conponents Not Elsewhere Classified 122 5.2-3 Federal OSHA Inspection Data for SIC 3679: Substances with Sanpled Exposures at or above 50% of the OSHA PEL 134 5.2-4 CAI/GSHA Inspection Data: Substances Encountered and Exposure Monitoring Results in SIC 3679 - Fifteen Inspections (1978-84) 135 5.3-1 OSHA Top Ranked Substances in NCHS Inventory by Weighted Index: SIC 3079, Miscellaneous Plastics Products 142 5.3-2 Federal OSHA Inspection Data for SIC 3079: Substances with Sanpled Exposures at or Above 50% of the OSHA PEL 144 5.4-1 OSHA Top Ranked Substances in NOHS Inventory by Weighted Index: SIC 3471, Electroplating 148 5.4-2 Federal OSHA Inspection Data for SIC 3471: Substances with Sanpled Exposures at or Above 50% of the OSHA PEL 150 5.5-1 OSHA Top Ranked Substances in NOHS Inventory by Weighted Index: SIC 8060, Hospitals 155 5.6-1 Substances Encountered and Exposure Monitoring Results for FMC Corporation (Military Vehicle Manufacture) in CAL/OSHA Inspec- tions, 1979-84 160 -xliv- image: ------- LEST OF APPENDICES Appendix 1 Environmental Monitoring Methods A-l Appendix 2 Examples of Biological Monitoring A-4 Appendix 3.1 Key CAI/OSHA Standards Applicable to Ocapational Health in Santa Clara County A-7 Appendix 3.2 Health Effects of Selected Substances Regulated Under CAI/OSHA GISO 5155 -Airborne Contaminants A-U Appendix 3.3 CAI/CSHA GISO 5155 - Airborne Contaminants (Complete Standard) A-17 Appendix 3.4 CAI/OSHA Standards Regulating Carcinogens A-32 Appendix 4 Santa Clara County Employment by Size of Establishment Workforce A-35 Appendix 5 Exposures to Hazardous Substances in Selected Industries with High Santa Clara County Employment, As shown by Federal OSHA Inspection Data A-49 Appendix 6 Industrial Hygiene Field Operations Manual (IHFOM) Hazardous Substance Code Numbers A-100 Appendix 7 Hazardous Substances in Selected Industries by Weighted Index . A-117 Appendix 8 NIOSH Documents Related to Selected Industries with High Santa dara County Employment A-229 Appendix 9 Registered Carcinogen Users in Santa Clara County A-293 Appendix 10 Resources and Data Directory for Occupational Health A-300 Appendix 11 A Key to Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Codes A-322 Appendix 12 Sairple from Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinance Data in the City of Santa Clara A-339 -xlv- image: ------- GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS CAL/OSHA EPA DFA DLSR DIR DOHS DOSH HESIS IBER IRI MIS NIOSH NOES NOHS OSHA OWI EEL RTECS SIC TWA California Occupational Safety and Health Administraticsn Program Environmental Protection Agency California Depac bnent of Food and Agriculture Division of labor Statistics and Research (in DIR) California Department of Industrial Relations California Department of Health Services Division of Occupational Safety and Health (in DIR) Hazard Evaluation System and Information Service (in DOHS) Inspection Based Exposure Rankings Integrated Environmental Management Project Industry Risk Index Federal OSHA Management Information System National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health National Occupational Exposure Survey National Occupational Hazard Survey Occupational Safety and Health Administration (federal) OSHA Weighted Index Permissible Exposure Level Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances Standard Industrial Classification Time Weighted Average -xlvi- image: ------- GLOSSARY OF MEASUREMENT ABBREVIATIONS mg/m3 - milligrams of contaminant per cubic meter of air ug/m3 - micrograms of contaminant per cubic meter of air ppm - parts of contaminant per million parts of air ppb - parts of contaminant per billion parts of air -xlvii- image: ------- 1. INTRODUCTION The following report has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of contract number 68-01-7002 of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This report represents an assessment of available information on occupational exposures within Santa Clara Valley, California, and was conducted as a companion piece to the- first phase of EPA's Integrated Environmental Management Project (IEMP). The IEMP is a broad assessment of health risks from "toxic pollutants" and of methods to manage those risks. The decision to assess workplace exposures within the Santa Clara Valley was made by the lEMP's Intergovernmental Coordinating Committee and Public Advisory Committee. The purpose of the work is to provide a context for the environmental risk findings which the IEMP is developing in Santa Clara County, and to provide local elected officials and other interested parties with a means of tying the two sets of issues (environmental and occupational) together. Based on a preliminary assessment of the type and quality of available data, the IEMP, in consultation with its advisory committees, concluded that this study should focus on qualitative analysis of occupational exposures and risks, rather than a quantitative risk assessment within that context, the report was to include: a) Descriptions of federal, state, and local agencies responsible for analyzing workplace exposures, and for setting and enforcing standards; b) A discussion of the methods for setting standards, and a compilation of the standards; c) A description of the past and ongoing research on workplace exposures in indus- tries prevalent in Santa Clara County; d) A qualitative discussion of the substances to which workers in Santa Clara Count\ industries may be exposed, and the possible order of magnitude of those exposures: and descriptions of further possible research. This report follows that prescribed outline. The report has certain limitations that derive directly from rankings of industry within Santa Clara County according to their potential for using hazardous chemicals and/or having a history of significant workplace exposures. The rankings were developed using federal OSHA and NIOSH data sources and do not derive from California or Santa Clara County data; there are no data available at the state or local level which would enable a ranking of industries according to severity of hazards present or even enable an assessment of chemicals and exposures. Therefore, the rankings generated in this report must be understood in that context. Projections for Santa Clara County were made b\ analyzing the county's employment patterns and applying priority rankings (based on federal OSHA inspection results) to the county data. Further investigations to assess the accuracy of these projections are clearly in order to determine if they are truly reflective of industries in Santa Clara County. We know of no reasons why the data derived from federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) sources should not be relevant to California, but given the age of information from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) there may be flaws, especially for those industries which have emerged since the early 1970s. -1- image: ------- possible every man and woman in the Nation safe and healthful working conditions and to preserve our human resources." To carry out this goal, the Act established several agencies, including the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, and the National Advisory Committee on Occupational Safety and Health (NACOSH). The most important of these agencies for purposes of this report are OSHA and NIOSH, these being the agencies responsible for characterizing and regulating workplace health hazards. NIOSH is discussed in a separate section below. OSHA is housed within the U.S. Department of Labor, and vested with broad authorit; to regulate workplace conditions to prevent occupational illness and injury. The agency has jurisdiction over all U.S. employers and their employees, except for state and local governments in their role as employers, federal agencies, and workplaces already protected by other federal agencies and statutes. Workplaces covered by other agencies include nuclear facilities, regulated by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission; pesticide application, regulated by the Department of Agriculture; and mining and milling, regulated by the Mine Safety and Health Administration. OSHA also does not directly regulate workplaces in those states, such as California, which are approved by federal OSHA to run thein own occupational safety and health programs; OSHA, however, does continue to monitor such programs. Circumstances under which OSHA allows states to run their own programs are discussed further below. All references to "OSHA" in this report denote the federal agency; the California state program is always referred to as "CAL/OSHA". 2.2.1 Functions of OSHA OSHA protects worker health in three principal ways: 1) through enforcement of existing occupational health and safety standards, 2) through the development of new or revised standards, and 3) through consultation and education services for employers and employees. 2.2.1.1 Enforcement OSHA's most direct impact on workplace conditions is through the on-site inspection c: workplaces. Health related ("industrial Hygiene") inspections are generally performed as a result of employee complaints, but they may also be conducted on OSHA's initiative. OSHA also investigates accidents (e.g. chemical spills in the workplace). Examples of OSHA investigations which have been performed on specific target industries include foundries and coke ovens. OSHA Inspections OSHA inspectors are authorized by the OSH Act to enter workplaces without giving prior notice of the inspection to the employer. Employers have the right to refuse entr> to an OSHA inspector if the inspector has not yet obtained a warrant, but entry is not routinely refused. The inspection may include every part of the workplace, even areas not implicated in the original complaint. An employee representative has the right to accompany the OSHA inspector during the inspection (known as the "walkaround" right). During a health -3- image: ------- OSHA on May 29, 1971, promulgated a standards package incorporating existing federal safety and health standards, and consensus standards adopted by independent professional organizations. Though this standards package was dominated by safety related standards, it also established Permissible Exposure Levels (PEL's) for approximately 450 workplace chemicals. These PEL'S were based on the 1968 "threshold limit values" (TLV's) previously established by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), an association composed of professional industrial hygiene personnel in government or educational institutions. The TLV's are considered by ACGIH to represent levels of exposure to toxic agents below which most workers will not experience toxic effect, even if exposed an average of 8 hours a day over a working lifetime; they are not intended by ACGIH to denote absolutely safe exposures. Some health-related consensus standards in the 1971 package were also adopted from another consensus organization, the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). ACGIH reviews its TLV's on a yearly basis. Since 1971, ACGIH has revised many of its TLV's, and has added TLV's for additional substances. These revisions and changes are not reflected in the PEL'S specified by OSHA based on the old ACGIH TLV's. Federal OSHA does not routinely "update" the PEL'S as ACGIH revisions are made. Thus, many current OSHA exposure limits for toxic substances do not reflect current toxicologic knowledge. This problem does not exist in California, as will be discussed. Comprehensive Standards After adopting the consensus standards in 1971, OSHA proceeded to develop more comprehensive standards for specific identified hazards, as well as methods for establishing standards-setting priorities. To date, OSHA has promulgated 25 comprehensive health standards for a number of chemical and physical hazards, such as lead, cotton dust and asbestos. These standards generally contain provisions concerning most aspects of use and handling of the hazard (hence the term "comprehensive"), including, depending on the standard, exposure limits, types of exposure controls, worker training, exposure monitoring requirements, medical examinations for workers, storage, disposal, and record-keeping requirements. The scope of such standards contrasts with the Air Contaminants Standard. which essentially prescribes only permissible exposure levels. It can readily be seen from the number of standards adopted after 1971 that the vast majority of OSHA-regulated toxic substances are not covered by a comprehensive standard. and are addressed only by the Air Contaminant PEL's. Even including the air contaminants standard, the number of OSHA-regulated toxic substances -- about 460 -- is far less than the total number of such substances present in workplaces. The OSH Act contains detailed requirements for standards development, modification or revocation. Standards setting or other action, (e.g. modification can be initiated as a result of OSHA's own determination that a standard is necessary, of research or recommen- dations by NIOSH (see NIOSH), or petitions by other federal, state or local agencies, employers organizations, unions, or any interested person. OSHA standards-setting proce- dures involve public hearings and participation of all interested parties. Before standards can be issued, the proposed standard must be published by OSHA in the Federal Register for public review and comment. All of OSHA's comprehensive standards were developed through the prescribed proce- dures. Changes in Air Contaminants PEL's would also necessarily be subjected to these procedures. However, as the initial adoption of ACGIH TLV's in 1971 was exempted from -5- image: ------- 2.2.1.3 Education and Consultation OSHA has promulgated as standards, or as parts of standards, numerous requirements designed to inform workers of the toxic substances to which they are exposed and the hazards associated with them. These requirements are based on the precept that workers have a right to such information as a condition of employment, and that disclosure is vital to the effective prevention of occupational disease. All workers are guaranteed access to their medical records and to monitored exposure levels in the work area (e.g., measurements of air concentrations); and workers must be supplied with information on the names and toxic properties of any toxic substances to which they may be exposed. Also, the OSH Act requires that consultation services be provided to employers, and employees "as an effective means of preventing occupational injuries and illnesses." In 19~5. OSHA entered into contracts with states without approved occupational safety and health plans (see below) to provide on-site consultation to employers about how they could comph with OSHA standards and regulations. States with their own OSHA programs also receive federal funding to maintain on-site consultation programs. (California maintains one such program; see "CAL/OSHA"). 2.2.2 State Plans Under Section 18 of the OSH Act, states can submit to OSHA plans for developing and enforcing their own occupational safety and health standards. If the plan is approved, the state assumes primary responsibility for protecting the safety and health of its workers. OSHA in general does not inspect work places in states with approved plans. though it is legally able to do so. In order for a state plan to be approved, it must be "at least as effective" as federal OSHA. Specifically, the plan must a) designate specific agency or agencies as responsible for administering the plan; b) provide for development of standards "at least as effective" as those of Federal OSHA; c) provide for enforcement of standards "at least as effective" as that of Federal OSHA, including right of entry and a prohibition on advance notice of inspection; d) show that the designated agency or agencies will have enough qualified personnel and proper legal authority to carry out their duties, and receive adequate funding. e) require employers to make reports to OSHA as otherwise required by the OSH Act: f) provide for protection of state workers; g) provide that the state will make reports to OSHA as OSHA requires; and h) allow workers to participate in cases involving empbyer appeals of penalties or abatement deadlines and to appeal state actions related to safety and health. -7- image: ------- a) Health Hazard Evaluations (HHE's). HHE's are conducted at the request of an authorized employee representative or, of the employer. They are designed to determine whether substances found at a particular worksite pose a health threat to workers, given the nature of their use. HHE's typically involve monitoring exposures to the suspected toxic agents, review of cases of worker illness, and recommendations for abating any found hazards. Requests for HHE's can be sent either to the NIOSH Division of Surveillance office in Cincinnati, or to the appropriate NIOSH regional office. The Region IX office in San Francisco estimates that approximately ten HHE's have been con- ducted for Santa Clara County in the past nine years. The Technical Assistance report is a less formal version of an HHE, and is typi- cally generated by a letter from an employer requesting assistance with a particular problem. Following an investigation, a letter is sent from NIOSH to the employer stating findings and recommendations. b) Control Technology (CT) studies. CT studies are initiated by NIOSH to evaluate techniques used to control health hazards. These studies focus on a particular industry, industrial process, or control technique. Though the emphasis in CT studies is on control techniques, work processes and associated hazards are also evaluated, to enable identification of major opportunities for exposure. Exposure sampling is extensively performed to evaluate the potentials for hazardous exposure and the effectiveness of control methods in place. CT studies are conducted by the Engineering Control Technology Program, based in Cincinnati. c) Industrywide (IW) studies. Industrywide studies are designed to determine whether specific occupational exposures of certain worker groups are associated with adverse health effects. They involve epidemiological analysis of disease in a given worker population, combined with exposure sampling. Walk-through survey reports document short (1-2 day) surveys at plant sites to evaluate their suitability for industry-wide studies, and contain limited or no exposure monitoring data. In-depth survey reports document detailed exposure information obtained during a survey of a plant site, and usually contain extensive air monitoring data. Industrywide studies are performed by the Division of Surveillance, Health Evaluation and Field Studies based in Cincinnati. In addition to the above studies, NIOSH contracts with outside organizations to conduct "Extent of Exposure Surveys". These surveys attempt to define the nature and extent of worker exposures to given hazards in selected occupations and industries. About 900 industrial hygiene surveys have done for extent-of-exposure studies, with about 10 being comprehensive (e.g. Worker Exposure to PCE in the Dry-Cleaning Industry). These studies typically document exposures by industry and job-type, describe monitoring procedures and current exposure controls, and provide toxicologic data. 2.3.2 Collection of Data on Hazards Present in U.S. Industries NIOSH has gathered a great quantity of information regarding both the toxicity of hazardous substances, and degree to which various occupational health hazards are present in the workplace. These data provide the basis for surveillance of workers in industries -9- image: ------- The monitoring methods in the manual are those generally used by NIOSH in conducting its own workplace investigations, and in state and federal OSHA program inspections. 2.3.4. Research and Standards Recommendations. NIOSH has formulated a list of priority toxic substances and physical agents, based on high degree of hazard and number of workers exposed, which forms the basis of other research, including laboratory studies (e.g. animal studies). On the basis of investigations of specific hazards, NIOSH recommends exposure limits and appropriate control techniques to OSHA. These .recommendations, known as Criteria Documents, often serve as a scien- tific basis for OSHA standards development. Criteria documents are meant to be objective scientific assessments regarding an agent's toxic effects and the exposure levels which produce them. As such, these recommendations can be more stringent than the correspond- ing OSHA standards, which must take into account the feasibility of control requirements. Employers are legally bound only to follow the OSHA standards. Usually issued by the Criteria Documentation Division, Criteria Documents include recommendations for a permissible exposure level, i.e., the concentration of a substance in the occupational environment that will not cause adverse health effects in exposed workers. and also recommendations for personal protective equipment, control measures, work practices, sanitation, hazard notification, medical surveillance, and recordkeeping. NIOSH publishes these documents (over 125 to date) after critically evaluating all known and available epidemiological, biological, industrial hygiene, engineering, chemical, and trade data and other information that may be relevant to recommending a standard. Production data are taken from EPA. Exposure data for industries and occupations are taken from the NOHS. 2.3.5 Education of Industrial Hygienists and Other Occupational Safety and Health Professionals. NIOSH is charged, under Section 21 of the OSH Act, to conduct education programs t; provide an adequate supply of qualified personnel to carry out the purposes of the Act. The Region IX office in San Francisco, with jurisdiction over Santa Clara County, offers seminars to health professionals in training at UC Berkeley, and contributes to the Occupational Medicine Residency Program at UC San Francisco Medical School. NIOSH also publishes a wide range of special reports and papers concerning occupa- tional health and safety issues. 2.4 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY The relevance of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to this section of the IEMP report lies in its administration of the Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 (TSCA i Under TSCA, manufacturers are required to submit a premanufacturing notice (MPN) to EPA prior to initiating either manufacture of a new chemical, or undertaking significant new use of any of 8 chemicals. EPA notification must include company name, chemical name, amount to be manufactured and several other items of information, on which basis the -EPA may limit, regulate or prohibit manufacture. Importers and exporters are subject to similar requirements. PMN's that are approved are added to the TSCA Inventory of -11- image: ------- ture (through the California Occupational Safety and Health Act, CAL. LABOR CODE Sees. 6300-6330) in 1972. This program, known as CAL/OSHA, covers all of the state's workers except those employed by the federal government, or protected by other federal or state agencies (e.g., pesticide applicators, who are protected by the state Department of Food and Agriculture.). CAL/OSHA's responsibilities essentially mirror those of Federal OSHA: they include standards development, standards enforcement, and education and consultation services for employers and employees with regard to workplace hazards and hazard control. Most CAL/OSHA functions are carried out by divisions of the Department of Industrial Rela- tions (DIR); there is not actually an agency called "CAL/OSHA". The major functional components of the CAL/OSHA Program under DIR are the Division of Occupational Safer. and Health, the Consultation Service, the Standards Board, and the Appeals Board. See Figure 2-1. Some CAL/OSHA activities are performed by the Department of Health Ser- vices through interagency agreements with DIR. This section will briefly describe components of the CAL/OSHA program, and discuss in greater detail CAL/OSHA compliance activity in Santa Clara County. 2.5.1 Components of the CAL/OSHA program. 2.5.1.1 CAL/OSHA Program Office. This office is responsible for coordinating CAL/OSHA activities with federal OSHA. It is in the Department of Industrial Relations, and is responsible to the DIR Director. 2.5.1.2 The Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board. The Standards Board is responsible for all authoritative decisions regarding occupa- tional health and safety standards in California. Discussion of its functions, and of the manner in which standards are produced, is contained in a separate section of this report, titled "Measurement and Evaluation of Occupational Exposure". The Standards Board is an independent unit within the Department of Industrial Relations. 2.5.1.3 The Division of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH) DOSH is responsible for enforcing Cal/OSHA standards by means of workplace inspec- tions, and for assisting with health standards development in cooperation with the Standards Board. DOSH is housed in the State's Department of Industrial Relations (DIR). DOSH is administered by a Chief and two Deputy Chiefs appointed by the Governor. DOSH itself is composed of several sub-units with diverse responsibilities, as can be seen in Figure 2-2. Key sub-units related to occupational health include: Field Compliance (Regional. District and Field Offices). Most CAL/OSHA health inspections, particularly those in response to worker com- plaints, are conducted by DOSH industrial hygienists based in 20 district offices through- out the state. In addition to the district offices, there are seven "field offices" with more -13- image: ------- DIVISION 0» UVUI-ATIUNAI SAKETt ANT1 HtALTH CIIIFI ^^^ • EMC I MCE H INC I SERVICES k wLVATORS I • STA»T • SERVICES ItRESSUHE VESSELS I < MINING and TUNNELING NANAGEHCrtT " INFORMATION -j COMMUNICATIONS 1 J EMPLOYEE | EDUCATION - PERSONNEL - TRAINING I 1 tCAL jnj BOI 1 1 I ILLU OhtRAI (Oil, orpuTY cnirr • REGION 1 1 San f r anc 1 «co 1 -I Sani a Rold -1 San Franc laco 1 | Berkeley •I S«n Mateo j San Jos« 1 | | KEG ION II S*crdfM*ni o ' Rrdd i nq 1 SacraBvnlo Concord : Hodralo t'rrano 1 JExcapi 1 I 1 RUGION III Sani a Ana J Sani a Ana • Sani a TV 1 San | ll<-cnardino 1 San Oi»ni ur a 1 HEALTH end TECHNICAL SERVICES OtfUTT CKIEf . 1] RESEARCH and - STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT OCCUPATIONAL " CANCER CONTROL ^ RADIATION HFDICAL SERVICES SPECIAL STUDIES RIGHT TO "" IINOW Figure 2-2 California Division of Occupational Safety and Health image: ------- Figure 2-3 California" Division of Occupational Safety and Health Field Operations 1n Northern California: County Boundaries for Regions I and II legion I San Francisco District 5 Santa Rosa (UJdah) District Berkeley (Concord) District 1 Ł*n Francisco (San Mateo) District 2 San Jose (Salinas) Region II Sacram-nto District 3 Redding (ChicoJ (ZLreka) District 1 Sacramento District U Modesto (Stockton) District 5 Fresno -17- image: ------- Research and Standards Development. The DOSH Research and Standards Development unit drafts new health standards for presentation to the Standards Board, and reviews existing standards for needed changes. The unit also reviews new federal OSHA standards, and serves as an information source on standards for the public. Safety-related standards are developed by the Standards Board itself. The unit consists of four filled industrial hygienist positions. Rieht-to-Know (RTK) Unit. This unit is responsible for MSDS's (Material Safety Data Sheets) received by DOSH from manufacturers of hazardous substances, as required by the Hazardous Substances Information and Training Act (Sections 6360-6399 of the California Labor Code). Under the Hazardous Substances Information and Training Act, all manufacturers of hazardous materials, as defined by the Act, which are sold to California employers, must file a Material Safety Data Sheet with DOSH, and supply the MSDS to all employers using the substance. Those employers must in turn supply the information to their employees. The MSDS contains data on the physical properties and hazardous health effects of the sub- stance, as well as other data. The RTK unit is in the process of checking received MSDS's for accuracy and completeness, and computerizing some of the data. The unit also helps field staff interpret and enforce the Right To Know law, and assists manufacturers, employers, employees and the public in understanding the law. The unit consists of two industrial hygienists, and one senior industrial hygienist who divides his time between this unit and the carcinogen unit (OCCU). 2.5.1.4 The Occupational Safety and Health Appeals Board. The Appeals Board is a quasi-judicial body which resolves disputes arising from CAL/OSHA program enforcement. The Board is an entity within the Department of Indus- trial Relations and consists of three members appointed by the Governor, with one repre- senting management, one labor, and one the general public. Administrative Law Judges employed by the Appeals Board hear and rule on appeals regarding citations, penalties, anc! abatement dates arising from enforcement of CAL/OSHA standards and regulations. The Board has the authority to deny an appeal, and to reconsider the ruling of the Administra- tive Law Judge. The Board can reduce or void citations or penalties, and extend or alter abatement dates. In some cases, an abatement date is suspended pending a ruling from the Board. 2.5.1.5 The CAL/OSHA Consultation Service. The Consultation Service is a division of DIR. It offers free consultation to employers to encourage voluntary compliance with CAL/OSHA occupational health and safety standards. The consultation service is housed in the Department of Industrial Relations, but is kept strictly separate from the compliance operations of DOSH. The Consultation Service offers information, advice, and recommendations on specific safety or health problems at a workplace. It will also help employers initiate an effective accident and illness prevention program or improve an existing program, and will provide training in safety and health practices on the job and in recognition and correction of hazards. The consultation service will also consult with an employer on appropriate action to remove or control an existing hazard. There is no referral to compliance officers as a result of any consultation service activity, except in cases where an employer refuses to -19- image: ------- Components of the Northern Occupational Health Center include the Occupational Health Clinic at UC San Francisco, which treats persons with suspected occupational disease and provides some medical surveillance related to lead, asbestos, and other hazards. and the Labor Occupational Health Program at UC Berkeley, which provides training ses- sions, publications, films, and technical assistance on occupational health and safety issues, and maintains an extensive library on standards and regulations, toxicology, hazard identification, and related topics. (Two other similar components are at UC Davis -- the Occupational and Environmental Medicine Clinic, and the Northern California Occupational and Environmental Health Unit.) 2.5.1.8 Air and Industrial Hygiene Laboratory. The laboratory is in the Laboratory Division of the Department of Health Services. Through an interagency agreement, the Laboratory supports DOSH field compliance activity through analysis of air samples taken during inspections. 2.5.2 CAL/OSHA Compliance Activity in Santa Clara County Compliance activity for Santa Clara county is conducted, as noted, from the Region I. District 2 office in San Jose. This office currently employs four industrial hygienists (IH's), and nine Safety Engineers. The office has been consistently staffed by four industrial hygienists since 1981, except during the latter half of 1985, when IH staffing temporarily was reduced to three, senior IH was transferred to a newly opened office in Concord. As of March 1986, the San Jose office was administered by an Acting District Man- ager, Milton Terry. The Regional Manager was John Tennyson. The present staff of four IH's is less than the number of positions presently allocated to the San Jose office by the state staffing formula: based on complaint volume, this formula has designated San Jose as requiring six IH's. In fiscal year 1985, the San Jose office received a total of 846 complaints of which approximately 30.3% were health complaints, with about 8.3% involving both health and safety problems. (According to the District office, these figures are consistent with previous years.) One additional industrial hygienist has been hired by the office and is due to begin work sometime in Spring 1986. The future of the sixth position was not clear as of March 1986. As noted above, the IH's in the San Jose office are responsible for compliance health inspections in Santa Cruz, Monterey, and San Bonito Counties, in addition to Santa Clara. However, about 80% of inspections by the office are conducted in Santa Clara County. Inspection figures for the San Jose District office were obtained directly from the District Office for fiscal years 1983 (July 1982 - June 1983) and 1984 (July 1983 - June 1984). In fiscal year 1983, the San Jose Office conducted 119 total industrial hygiene inspections, 59 of which resulted in the issuance of a citation or information memorandum In fiscal year 1984, the office conducted a total of 134 industrial hygiene inspections, 52 of which resulted in a citation or information memorandum. In both years, approximate!} 60-75% of the inspections were in Santa Clara County. Thus, in fiscal year 1983, between approximately 72 and 90 industrial hygiene inspections took place in Santa Clara County; and in fiscal year 1984, this total was between 80 and 100. Exact figures were not available from the District Office. Computer data from the DOSH Management Informa- -21- image: ------- If, upon inspection, DOSH industrial hygienists encounter violations, they are empowered to issue citations ordering the hazard to be abated within a set period of time Citations must be approved by the District Manager, who also determines the amount of any penalties assessed. Penalty structures are contained in Title 8 of rhe California Administrative Code, Section 336. They include: Regulatory Violation: to $1,000. General Violation: to $1,000. Serious Violation: to $2,000. Carcinogen-Failure to Register: $500. Carcinogen-Serious: $1,000., no adjustment Failure to Abate: to $1,000. per day (general and regulatory). to $2,000. per day (serious). Repeat: first repeat - 2 times previous penalty. second repeat - 4 times previous penalty. third repeat - 10 times previous penalty, up to $10,000 (general) or $20,000 (serious). Willful: to $10,000 general and regulatory to $20,000 serious. An employer may be cited for up to ten general or regulatory violations (per inspection) without being assessed financial penalties. Serious violations always entail financial penalties. In the case of serious violations, the district office can also notify the Bureau of Investigations for possible referral of the case for criminal prosecution. In practice, however, criminal penalties have seldom been used in cases of health and safety violations. In addition to citations for violations of existing standards, DOSH can issue informa- tion memoranda, special orders, and notices. An information memorandum is not a citation, but instructs the employer to attend to a situation which has the potential for becoming hazardous in the future. A Special Order is an order to abate a hazard for which there is no existing standard, and applies only to the specific worksite for which it is written. In effect, it is an ad hoc standard to address a hazard at a particular place of employment. A special order must be followed like any other standard; failure to comply will result in a citation. The power to write special orders is the CAL/OSHA equivalent of the federal OSHA "General Duty Clause". A notice is issued in lieu of a citation for violations with no direct effect on the health or safety of employees. (In practice, notices are rarely issued.) If there is an imminent hazard to worker health or safety, the DOSH inspection can issue an order prohibiting use. The order prohibiting use can apply to a machine, work area, or entire plant. The area or equipment where an imminent hazard exists is marked by a yellow tne. which may be removed only by a DOSH representative and after appro- priate safeguards have been instituted. The ability to issue an order prohibiting use and -23- image: ------- 2.6 Department of Industrial Relations. Division of Labor Statistics and Research: Illness Reporting Systems The Division of Labor Statistics and Research (DLSR) is, like DOSH, a Division in the Department of Industrial Relations. Though it is separate from the CAL/OSHA program, DLSR keeps various statistics relevant to occupational health. Whereas DOSH maintains records relevant to its compliance inspections of worksites, DLSR maintains various statis- tics related to cases of occupational illness. Though these statistics are all beset by certain limitations in terms of their ability to characterize occupational illness patterns in California, they provide a good deal of valuable information, and represent the best avail- able sources of data in the nation for estimating cases of work-related disease in various industries. DLSR also maintains an industrial relations research library. There are three primary sources of DLSR data on occupational illness, the OSHA 200-S form completed by employers as part of the annual federal Bureau of Labor Statistics Annual Survey, The "Employer's Report of Occupational Injury or Illness", and the "Doc- tor's First Report of Occupational Injury or Illness". These three sources each focus on different aspects of occupational illness and injury, and differ with respect to diseases included and industries covered. The sources, and the data bases and reports developed from them, are as follows: 2.6.1 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Annual Survey. Under Section 8(c)(2) of the OSH Act, employers subject to OSHA regulation are required to maintain records of work-related injuries, illnesses, and deaths. Every year, the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics conducts a national survey, using questionnaires (the OSHA 200 form) mailed to a scientifically selected sample of firms, to estimate total occupational injuries and illnesses and incidence rates for all segments of industry subject to OSHA (or state OSHA program) regulation. The same form is also obtained by DLSR, from the same California respondents in the national survey, to analyze California data specifically. In California, approximately 32,000 employers are surveyed, with about 95% providing usable responses. All injuries and illnesses requiring more than first aid are considered reportable. The California data are published by DLSR about two years after the year for which they are collected. The published report, titled "Occupational Injuries and Illnesses Survey of California" presents illness rates by industry, type of case (i.e. whether or not it involved lost work-days), number of lost work-days, number of illnesses by industry and type of case, and percent distribution of occupational illnesses by category of illness (without industry data). There are seven disease groups tabulated from the survey, includ- ing skin disorders, dust diseases of the lung, respiratory conditions due to toxic agents. systemic poisoning, disorders due to physical agents, diseases of repeated trauma (e.g. hearing loss, Reynaud's Syndrome and synovitis), and other (including infectious diseases. malignant and benign tumors). The California report does not include data on fatalities. There are four basic limitations to the use of the survey data as presented in the DLSR Report a) Illness categories are very broad and often yield little insight into the nature of the disability. (For example, malignancies and infectious disease both appear under the category of "other"). Also, the seven general categories are not compan- -25- image: ------- c) Data are coded by county, allowing for development of local statistics. d) The illness classification and coding system for this database is quite detailed, unlike that used for the BLS survey, containing dozens of disease categories. e) The classification of illnesses and injuries from the Employer's Report forms is done by DLSR, based on descriptive data supplied by the employer on the form, and not by the employer, as is the case in the BLS survey data. Thus, the Employer's Report database is unaffected by misclassification on the part of employers, or by decisions in a given industry as to how to classify certain types of symptoms or impairment. f) The linkage of the Employer's Reports to the Worker's Compensation System, even though the reports are not used in claims litigation, has been associated with stable and reliable employer reporting. Hence, the data from the reports can be combined with employment data to produce rates of illness in an industry, allow- ing reasonable comparisons among industries. DLSR does not presently calculate such rates itself, however. Notwithstanding the above positive features, the "Employer's Report" database is also beset by important limitations with regard to occupational illness: a) Underreporting. As with the other DLSR illness reporting systems, difficulties in identifying occupational illness hinder reporting. Of all collected reports, those relating to illness (as opposed to injury), comprise only 5%. The low volume of illness-based reports undermines to some extent the detailed classification of illness in the database. In fact, most of the tables in DLSR's annual report based on this database ("Work Injuries and Illnesses") lump all occupational illness together in one category, or aggregate all illness together with injury totals when analyzing statistics by industry or occupation. b) Bias toward acute illness. Again, like the other databases, acute disability tends to dominate in Employer's Reports, while the degree to which chronic illness is underreported is not known. In addition, employers tend not to file a report for illness which cannot be traced to a particular incident. c) Incomplete Reporting. Though the Employer's Report requests much detailed info: mation, the information often is not or cannot be supplied. For example, for 2 ? of occupational illness, the "source" (e.g. toxic substance) is "not stated" d) Coverage. The database misses contested disease cases for which no Employers Report was filed, and cases which did not result in a full day of work loss. The latter point is particularly important insofar as transient symptoms produced by toxic exposures may not result in the generation of a report. Despite these limitations, the detailed level of information coded from the reports, and the suitability of this information for establishing rates, makes this database reasonably useful for evaluating illness characteristics in an industry, for developing local data, and for comparing industries. -27- image: ------- Thus, the Doctor's First Report database represents a highly refined source of informa tion which awaits more complete and widespread reporting to become a truly useful tool for analysis of occupational disease in the state. Nevertheless, the database provides a good indication of the illnesses and occupational hazards which prompt workers in a given industry to seek medical treatment, and the amount of work time lost or hospitalization resulting from illness. Reports available from DLSR based on the above data bases are described in Appen- dix 10. 2.7 California Department of Food and Agriculture • Under a 1976 interagency agreement with the Department of Industrial Relations, the California Department of Food and Agriculture (DFA) has primary regulatory responsibilit> for all occupational health hazards associated with pesticide use, including pesticide application, handling, mixing and loading, and residue (e.g. farmworker) exposures. DIR still retains jurisdiction over occupational hazards associated with pesticide manufacture. storage, and distribution (wholesale and retail sales). This division of labor between agencies is not absolute and situations of overlapping jurisdiction remain. For example, during certain fumigation operations, the application of the fumigant is under DFA juris- diction, while the plant workers potentially exposed to fumigant residue are still techni- cally protected by CAL/OSHA. In addition, considerable responsibility for agricultural hazards lies with the local County Agricultural Commissioner, and most investigations of reported pesticide exposures are in fact conducted by the County Agriculture Commis- sioner's Offices. Thus, in regard to pesticide illness investigations and some types of data collection, DFA cooperates closely with the County Agricultural Commissioners. DFA regulates and monitors pesticide use through its Division of Pest Management. Environmental Protection, and Worker Safety. Among the functions performed by the Divi- sion are the following: 2.7.1 Pesticide Use and Illness Surveillance DFA maintains three separate data bases on pesticide use and exposure including a) pesticide use reports, b) pesticide registration, and c) pesticide illness and investigation reports. These systems are described in detail in Appendix 10. 2.7.2 Health Effects Information. DFA's Worker Health and Safety Unit (in the Division of Pest Management) responds to inquiries on health effects and illness associated with specific pesticides. -29- image: ------- registry and cluster identification and investigation program. The Program covers six Bay Area counties, including Santa Clara. (Further details on the CBDMP are given in Appen- dix 10.) 2.8.2 The Resource for Cancer Epidemiology. This service collects and evaluates information on occurrences of cancer in the San Francisco Bay Area counties, and operates the California Tumor Registry. The California Tumor Registry collects and evaluates information on occurrences of cancer in San Fran- cisco Bay Area counties, not including Santa Clara County, by abstracting data from medi- cal records and death certificates. 2.8.3 The Radiologic Health Branch. The Radiologic Health Branch keeps general information on radiologic health effects and handling of materials, makes referrals to consulting physicians and offers hands-on help in emergency incidents. 2.8.4. The Toxic Substances Control Division. The Division provides technical advice and information to industry and the public on hazardous waste control, and maintains the Hazardous Waste Information System. This sys- tem is developed from Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifests, which must be filed by any facility transporting hazardous waste or storing it over 90 days. The Division also issues permits for, and monitors the treatments, long-term storage, and disposal of, hazardous waste. 2.8.5 The Petris Bill (SB 495) A new bill has recently been passed in the State legislature that establishes a program supporting CAL-OSHA and local occupational health and safety agencies to be administered by the state Department of Health Services. Senate Bill no. 495, known as the Petris Bill. affirms that the "surveillance of occupational disease represents an important avenue for anticipating risks to public health" and mandates the implementation within the state department of "a continuing research and development capability and a repository of hazardous substances capability which will reinforce and strengthen the administration of the California Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1973... including the capability to recommend occupational health standards to the California Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board." More specifically, the functions of the program established by the Petris bill include, but are not limited to, the following: a) Investigations into the causes of morbidity and mortality from work-induced dis- eases. b) Development of recommendations for improved control of work-induced diseases. c) Maintenance of a thorough knowledge of the effects of industrial chemicals and work practices on the health of California workers. -31- image: ------- Another source of information is the California Worker's Compensation Institute, which is an association of private worker's compensation insurance carriers. The Institute collects data from its members to study problems in the Worker's Compensation system. The limi- tations of these data are the absence of a routine review of member carrier data and the lack of key data elements. 2.10 Local Aeencies. Organizations and Regulations. 2.10.1. Santa Clara County Health Department The regulation of occupational exposures at the local level in Santa Clara is presently severely limited. The county Section of Occupational Health (formerly referred to as Division of Occupational Health), once staffed by two chemists, three industrial hygiemsts. an M.D., a nursing consultant, and a director in the early seventies, is currently staffed by a single chemist. The Section has been allocated one industrial hygienist position, which is vacant. Medical records and reports compiled in the 20 years of the Section's existence are in hard copy files only: nothing has been computerized. Bud King, former director of the Division of Occupational Health, reported that in the past the Division carried out a variety of investigations, many of which were the result of burns, with "some gas expo- sures, mostly phosphine and arsine". The Division also supervised asbestos sampling. Some activities relevant to occupational health are currently performed by the office of Hazardous Materials in the Department's Environmental Health Services Division. This unit performs air monitoring for other county agencies on request. The Division does not at present respond to monitoring requests from the public, however. The office of Hazar- dous Materials also administers the Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinance for the county (see below). 2.10.2 The Santa Clara County Agricultural Commissioner's Office. The Commissioner's Office investigates occupational exposures to pesticides in Santa Clara County. The Santa Clara Agricultural Commissioner is appointed by the County Board of Supervisors, but receives 60% funding through a contractual arrangement with the State Department of Food and Agriculture (DFA; see also the Section on DFA). The Com- missioner receives pesticide use reports from local companies and agencies, and pesticide illness reports from the County Health Officer (who receives them from physicians). The Commissioner investigates all reported cases of pesticide-related illness resulting from use, handling, mixing, loading or residues of pesticides; illnesses resulting from manufacturing of pesticides are investigated by the DOSH San Jose office. Though the Commissioner's office forwards use reports and reports of pesticide illness to the Department of Food and Agriculture (DFA) for inclusion in Statewide Data-systems (see DFA section), these reports are also available from the Commissioner. 2.10.3 The Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinances Santa Clara County in 1983 passed a Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinance requiring any party storing hazardous materials to obtain and keep a current hazardous materials -33- image: ------- areas. The office has received about 600 files, starting in spring 1984, which eventually will be accessible by company name, company address, type of business (not SIC), type of hazardous material and type of storage. SIC's are not required either on the town or county permit applications or HMMP's. Use of Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinances data to identify hazardous workplaces is limited at present, due to incomplete reporting and computerization. Failure to include SIC information in the HMIS, decentralized record-keeping, and limited computer capabilir. of some municipalities all hamper use of these data for industry-wide surveillance, and make them more suitable for identifying hazards used in individual firms. An example of the type of data available from municipalities is shown in Appendix 12, using material obtained from the City of Santa Clara. The County currently has plans to compile a centralized inventory of hazardous mate- rial users in the county, derived from municipal data from Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinances, and from data to be collected in compliance with AB 2185 (the Waters Bill). (This bill requires the County to develop an inventory of facilities using hazardous materi- als to create area emergency response plans.) This central inventory would be maintained by the County Health Department's Office of Hazardous Materials. The specific form and content of this database have not yet been determined. The inventory will not be com- pleted before 1987, and a precise timetable for completion has not been established. 2.10.4. SCCOSH. SCCOSH is a local citizen organization concerned with occupational health. SCCOSH provides information on health effects of toxic substances, including health and safety information on the electronics industry. It conducts workshops on specific occupations hazards, and provides movies and slide shows on occupational safety and health. The Cen- ter also furnishes medical and legal referrals. 2.10.5. Valley Health Center. The Valley Health Center, part of the County hospital in San Jose (the Valley Medical Center) currently operates an occupational medicine clinic. The clinic is staffed by one occupational health physician, Dr. Linda Morse, and one occupational health nurse. -35- image: ------- Contaminants (Sec. 5155); and Special Hazardous Substances and Processes (Sees. 5194-5220) Some of these standards, such as those for lead (Sec. 5216), EDB (Sec. 5219), ethylene oxide (Sec. 5220), asbestos (Sec. 5208), and inorganic arsenic (Sec. 5214), are "comprehensive", in that they contain detailed requirements related to a wide range of hazard monitoring and control activities. They represent a complex, integrated approach to hazard control. Such standards generally include provisions for warning labels, exposure monitoring in the work area, personal hygiene, "housekeeping" requirements, record-keeping, work practice and engineering controls to reduce exposure (e.g. handling methods, ventilation), medical surveillance to monitor exposure and disease in workers, protective equipment specifica- tions, employee education and training, and a maximum permissible exposure level (PEL). Issues of the work practices and engineering controls to limit exposure are carefully reviewed in these -standards. Most regulated hazardous substances, however, are controlled only by the Airborne Contaminants Standard (Sec. 5155) which simply establishes maximum permissible exposure levels (PEL) and basic monitoring requirements. The PEL'S contained in the Airborne Contaminants Standard are adapted from the Threshold Limit Values (TLV's) recommended by the American Conference of Governmen- tal Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), and are periodically updated to reflect changes in the ACGIH recommendations. However, ACGIH TLV's are not designed to be wholly protec- tive of all workers, and ACGIH itself calls attention to the fact that a small percentage of workers may not be adequately protected by the recommended limits. Accordingly, the PEL'S in the Airborne Contaminants Standard may also be inadequate for some workers. The California Airborne Contaminants Standard covers 570 contaminants, or 225 more than the comparable federal standard. Other standards (specifically Sees. 5225-5230, related to labelling; Sec. 5194, the state's "right-to-know" standard; and Sec. 3204, allowing worker access to exposure and medical records) also add labelling and education requirements for many of these substances. 3.2.2 Terminology Interpretation of health standards requires an understanding of certain specialized terms. "Permissible Exposure Level" (PEL) defines the maximum legally allowable concen- trations of a toxic substance to which nearly all workers may be repeatedly exposed, day after day, without harmful effect. PEL'S are typically expressed as a time weighted aver- age (TWA) for an eight-hour period. A TWA is the actual concentration of a substance to which a worker is exposed over a given period of time. For example, the PEL for inor- ganic arsenic (GISO 5214) is an eight-hour TWA of 0.01 milligrams per cubic meter of air PEL's may be accompanied by a ceiling limit, which is never to be exceeded. These latter recommendations are typically made to prevent acute illness, such as irritation and acute poisoning. Some comprehensive standards also refer to an "action level", which is the minimum concentration of exposure at which control provisions described in the standard (in addi- tion to monitoring) must be implemented. Some substances in the airborne contaminants standard are also governed by an "excursion limit", the maximum concentration to which an employee may be exposed -regardless of duration provided the 8 hour TWA concentra- tion doesn't exceed the PEL. Excursion limits are accompanied by an "excursion duration". the maximum time period allowed for an exposure above the excursion limit but not exceeding the ceiling limit. -37- image: ------- expressly encourage the Division of Occupational Safety and Health to develop, and the Standards Board to adopt, health standards even when no comparable federal standard exists, whenever available evidence dictates that such action is necessary to protect worker health. This encouragement is consistent with the OSH Act, which permits state standards to exceed those of federal OSHA if they are necessary due to local conditions, and do not unduly disrupt interstate commerce. There are several key differences between California Occupational Health Standards and those of federal OSHA. First, the California Airborne Contaminants Standard (GISO 5155) covers 570 substances, while the corresponding federal standard covers only 391 substances. Moreover, California has reviewed these PEL'S in light of changes in ACGIH recommendations, and in many cases revised the PEL's to reflect these changes. Federal OSHA has made no corresponding revisions. Certain standards requiring general safety provisions for particular classes of substances (e.g., corrosives) also have no federal counterpart. Section 24230 of the Health and Safety Code requires that users of substances identified by the state as carcinogens, presently comprising 22 substances, must register with the state. No such federal registration requirement exists. California has also adopted two comprehensive standards -- for MOCA and for EDB --which have no federal counterpart. 3.2.5 Factors in Developing a Standard Standards must be set such that to the extent "feasible", no employee suffers material impairment of health, even if regularly exposed to a substance for his or her working life This mandate imposes several burdens on the Standards Board. It must show that a sub- stance or process as it is actually encountered in the workplace can cause "material impair- ment", and that the proposed exposure limits and controls are sufficient to prevent material impairment and that methods for complying with the standard are feasible, i.e., are techno- logically possible and within the means of at least some firms in an industry to adopt. The types of information needed to satisfy these requirements may differ considerably depend- ing on the nature of the hazard at issue; accordingly, there are no specific criteria for evidence for material hazard or "safe" exposure levels. However, the U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the federal OSHA cotton dust standard in which a PEL was established to pre- vent the early acute, reversible effects of cotton dust exposure, and further stated that this approach was entirely appropriate to the definitions of "material impairment". That is, the regulating agency need not only protect against the levels that result in chronic, irrever- sible disease. The court recognized that the disease associated with cotton dust exposure was a continuous process and that prevention of early reversible effects would result in elimination of chronic disease. Unfortunately, neither CAL/OSHA's Airborne Contaminants' PEL'S, nor the PEL's in the individual comprehensive standards (e.g. lead) afford total protection to all workers. The Airborne Contaminants' PEL's are based on ACGIH TLV's, which, as noted, are not set to protect all workers. Moreover, some of the substances now regulated under the Airborne Contaminants Standard (e.g., benzene), or under individual comprehensive stan- dards (e.g. asbestos, GISO 5208) are suspect or known carcinogens, and prevailing scientific opinion holds that any level of exposure to carcinogens entails some risk. Reduction of carcinogen exposures to zero, however, is generally not possible within the "feasibility" constraint on federal and state standard setting. Feasibility constraints have often limited the level of protection of non-carcinogens as well. For example, OSHA anticipated that even with compliance, the Cotton Dust Standard would still allow a 14% prevalence of lung disease byssinosis among cotton and textile -39- image: ------- hazardous substance (i.e., concentrations above the "action level"). Monitoring is also needed if a new process or operation involving hazardous sub- stances is implemented or changes are made in the old ones, to determine if toxic levels of exposure are occurring. Monitoring can also be used to identify the source of a contami- nant, and to test the effectiveness of engineering controls such as proper ventilation or an enclosure system. Because inhalation is the major route of entry of a contaminant in the work environ- ment, air sampling is the most important type of workplace environmental monitoring. Choice of sampling methods depends on a number of variables, e.g., what are the objectives of the sampling: to identify potential hazards and define sources of contamination; to assess employee exposure to a known contaminant; to assess compliance with existing stan- dards; to conduct epidemiologic investigations; to do continuous monitoring in order to trigger an alarm should a certain level be exceeded. Another variable is consideration of the substance being sampled, and its physical properties, such as whether it is a gas or paniculate. Due to different physical and chemical properties of hazards, different air sampling techniques must be used. Specific techniques may be used for specific chemicals. The work space, the industrial processes, plus worker behavior should also be considered in choosing air sampling methods. There are two basic types of air sampling, area and personal, each suited to different objectives and circumstances. Area sampling, as implied by the name, is the collection of air in a given area of the workplace. Area sampling can be collected over a short period of time ("grab sampling") to detect the presence of a contaminant or measure a peak hazard concentration, or over a longer period of time to measure average hazard concentra- tions, or to detect whether air concentrations ever exceed certain levels. Area sampling can be performed close to workers at a particular work station, or close to the source or suspected source of exposure (e.g., a particular machine) in order to characterize exposures in the work station or at the source. If, on the other hand, the object of sampling is to locate a source of contamination, or to check the effectiveness of control measures (e.g. ventilation system), area sampling can be performed on general room air through a network of various sampling points. A key advantage of area sampling is that it can be conducted from fixed points using stationary equipment. Because the equipment is thus not constrained by consider- ations of size or weight, large but very accurate instruments can be used to monitor key work areas or equipment continuously. Continuous monitoring is especially vital where substances in use have acute toxic effects, and are therefore not to exceed specified ceiling limits. The disadvantage of area sampling is that, precisely because it is conducted from fixed points, it does not measure the true exposures received by workers, who may move among different work areas. Personal Sampling for air contaminants, in contrast, is designed to measure the actual exposures received by workers in any or all of their work stations, or during their entire shift. Such sampling typically uses a device worn by the worker, which measures the hazard concentrations in the worker's breathing zone (i.e., close to the worker's face). Air samples collected in this manner are also called operator's breathing zone (obz). Because personal sampling more accurately measures workers' true exposures, it is required by some CAL/OSHA comprehensive standards in order to calculate 8 hr. TW.Vs (time weighted average), and is considered by CAL/OSHA to be the only truly reliable method for obtaining exposure measurements that can be compared with hazard PEL's. -41- image: ------- peak exposures to dangerous compounds, such as arsine, carbon monoxide, and hydrogen cyanide. Also, the intrusive nature of some methods, such as blood sampling, make them unpopular with employees. In addition, there are research-related limitations. One is the need for more toxico- logical information regarding the absorption, metabolism (including mechanism of action), distribution and excretion of the agent being monitored. Also, one needs to show at what level of a biological parameter adverse health effects occur. Establishing a "normal" value entails far reaching cross-sectional surveys. Finally, it is very important to have reliable tests for biological monitoring, i.e., tests with good predictive value, sensitivity and specificity, and reproducibility. All these areas need further research. 3.3.2.3 Most Common Specimens In selecting a biological media to analyze, several considerations must be taken into account: a) The convenience of obtaining a specimen or its routine availability; b) The route of exposure/intake; c) The metabolic pathway of the exposure substance in the body; d) The time of sampling; e) The availability of published, reference limits; and f) The characteristics of the analytic method to be employed. The three most com- monly evaluated media are urine, blood and expired air. Urine analysis is probably the most frequently used method in biological monitoring. Samples are easy to collect and the procedure is noninvasive. Furthermore, nearly all exposure chemicals or their metabolites are present in urine in amounts often proportional to the absorbed dose. Urine analysis may be used to monitor for metabolites of solvents such as benzene, styrene, xylene, toluene, TCE, etc., and has also been used for direct measurements of such inorganic substances as arsenic, cadmium, chromium, and lead. Expired air, like urine, is an easily obtained specimen but its use is limited to substances with a sufficiently high volatility to be exhaled in measurable amounts. Such substances include chlorinated hydrocarbon solvents like methylene chloride, carbon tetrach- loride and trichloroethylene, and unsubstituted aromatic hydrocarbon solvents like benzene, toluene and xylene. The marked influence of atmospheric concentrations on breath concen- trations and the rapid excretion of volatile substances limit the collection of samples to the time just after exposure. However, samples taken shortly after exposure may represent the latest exposure level and not an average. Thus appropriate timing and good analytical techniques are particularly difficult problems in this biological monitoring technique. While blood concentrations of a substance may seem to represent the best correlation between the atmospheric concentrations, amount absorbed, amount retained and in some cases the severity of the effect, blood analysis is more problematic than urine or breath analysis due. to the fact that it is an invasive technique. Worker participation and frequent acquisition of samples would subsequently be limited. Monitoring of blood has been used to measure carbon monoxide exposure, which causes the formation of carboxyhe- -43- image: ------- 4. OCCUPATIONAL HAZARDS IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY 4.1 Introduction This section identifies industries in Santa Clara County with the greatest assessed potential for occupational health problems derived from chemical exposure At the outset, it is important to state that given the available data, with the exception of the data presented in the industry profile section, we were not able to document actual occupational health problems in specific industries. We have therefore used federal data bases available to us to identify potential problems. These include recently developed industry rankings based on Federal OSHA inspection results and NIOSH NOHS data; the use of these data bases has been described in detail elsewhere (1). For the purpose of this study, industry was ranked according to the real or potential exposure to hazardous agents rather than on the basis of existing occupational illness or disease. To rank industries by their potential or real exposures to hazardous substances, three types of information were sought: a) What is the extent of exposure to hazardous substances in the industry, including the number of substances and levels of exposure? b) What is the nature of the health effects associated with each chemical? c) How many workers are exposed? The following information was gathered and used to develop the industry rankings. a) Industry size. Industry size is characterized by the number of persons employed in a given 4-digit Standard Industrial Classification Code (SIC). The distribution of employees within a SIC was also considered important. For example, a SIC with total employment of 1,000 may include 10 facilities of 100 persons each or 1 facility employing a 1,000 persons. b) A history of documented high exposure to multiple agents which have significant toxicitv. There are four sources of information on actual worker exposure which have potential use in ranking industry. These include: • Federal OSHA compliance information. This information derives from federal OSHA compliance inspections in states where there are no state OSHA programs. The information is contained in the OSHA Management Information System (MIS). • CAL/OSHA compliance information. Data derived from actual inspections in Santa Clara County and/or California may have utility in ranking of industries. Unfortunately, CAL/OSHA compliance data are not computerized. Each case file must be reviewed individually and exposure painstakingly extracted by hand if CAL/OSHA information is to be used in assessing the occupational health problems in Santa Clara County. -45- image: ------- The following criteria were used: a) Psychological and physical factors were not considered. b) Rankings are for industry only, and not occupation. (Although the logical unit for both surveillance and enforcement is the company or the industry, the lack of data bases which record occupation necessitates this approach as well.) c) The unit of analysis is the four digit Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code which identifies industries producing similar products. Within one SIC, however, there are industries which may have different chemical usage and exposure experience. 4.2.1 Problems in Data Collection Where problems were encountered in developing data on chemical exposure and indus- try demographics , they were due in most part to one of two general situations - either the desired data were not available, or in some way their applicability was limited. There were three reasons for data not being available. These include: 1) the desired information had not been gathered at all, 2) it had been gathered without the advantage of computer- ization and/or tabulation, or 3) it was gathered under the auspices of an agency which held the data confidential. Examples of non-computerization were abundant, particularly in local agencies working on hazardous waste control and 'Right-to-Know'. For example, the City of Santa Clara, which has the most thorough computerization of hazardous materials management information to date, does not keep records by SIC. Confidentiality was a problem in obtaining an industry-occupation matrix and employment projections. In some of these situations, it would seem that greater inter-agency cooperation might allow these data to be used for research purposes while still protecting legitimate requirements for confidentiality. The Employment Development Department (EDD) of the State of California maintains an industry-occupation matrix. Unfortunately, for purposes of this research, it is highly confidential (that is, restricted to EDD use only). A data tape was obtained which listed Occupational Employment Survey (OES) estimates of employment patterns by SIC. Lack of numeric coding of occupational titles precluded using this tape to construct an industry- occupation matrix for this report. EDD also publishes some OES data, but unfortunately the published data were not sufficiently detailed for use in a project of this nature, e.g. most of the industry data are at the 2-digit SIC level. EDD also maintains an industry- occupation matrix based on a 20% sample of the 1970 Census. It is less current, less accurate and less detailed than the OES matrix, and it is also confidential. There is an appeals process through which health research projects might obtain an actual matrix from EDD, though this process is a protracted one for which the time frame of this project did not allow. Future research in this area could benefit greatly from pursuing an EDD matrix. 4.2.2 Data Sources Only two data sources which provided information on chemical use were available, anJ only one of these gives actual exposure information. NIOSH's National Occupational Hazard Survey (NOHS) conducted from 1972-1974, identifies potential chemical exposures in industries (2, 3). NIOSH has recently completed a new survey, the National Occupa- -47- image: ------- Hazard Ranking: The HRINs for each substance found in an industry are weighted by the exposure factor and then summed to yield a final value, the Industry Risk Index (IRI). The IRI system is flexible in allowing the user to choose several options: 1) what health effect endpoints will be considered 2) what weight each endpoint will be assigned; 3) whether to analyze SIC codes by 2, 3 or 4 digits; and 4) whether to weight ratings by the 1973 census figures (5). In our modification of the IRI, we chose the 4-digit SIC level of analysis without census data weightings. We selected three health effects endpoints: "acute toxicity" as a measure of acute effects, "carcinogenicity/neoplasticity" as a measure of DNA effects, and "other toxic effects" as a measure of chronic effects. A normalized sum of those three effects was calculated whereby all three outcome measures have the same range and the same weight. 4.2.3.2 OSHA Weighted Index Ranking (OWI). To develop inspection priorities, federal OSHA used NOHS to design a 'Weighted Index' (OWI) by SIC code.(7) This system is currently not in use by federal or State OSHA programs. There are significant differences between this index and the IRI: only chemicals regulated by OSHA are included and there is no correction for whether controls are in place, because OSHA must also inspect controlled exposures. The OSHA Weighted Index uses a different approach to weight part-time versus full-time exposures and to assess the toxic potency of a substance. Exposure Factor: The exposure index for each SIC is based on NOHS data. Whereas NIOSH gives full-time exposure twice the weight of part-time, OSHA gives it five times the weight. Hazard Ranking: OSHA convened a panel of scientists to assign a simple hazard weight to each substance the agency regulates. The basic criterion was the judged seriousness of the exposure-related health effects. Factors in the judgement included strength of the evidence on whether the substance causes cancer or irreversible health effects, whether the evidence is based on human or animal studies and the number of organ systems affected. The scale developed by OSHA was a simple 1, 3, 7, 10 rating, with 10 being the most serious. The resultant hazard weight for each chemical was then multiplied by the exposure factor and the results summed for all regulated substances found by NOHS in the SIC code. The original OWI was modified to include only SIC codes where the worksite included in the NOHS survey had at least 100 workers; SICs with fewer workers were accepted onl\ if NOHS had sampled two or more sites within the SIC. 4.2.3.3 Industry Rankings Based on Actual Exposure Information: The Inspection-Based Industry Ranking (IBERs). We developed a ranking system using the federal OSHA MIS compliance data. This system includes information on actual levels of exposure in contrast to the NOHS survey of potential industrial exposures. The data used covered almost four years of federal OSHA inspection data (1979-1982) derived from approximately 15,000 inspections and 60.00t test samples from 475 SICs in states without state OSHA enforcement programs. California is Q2i included in this database. SICs with fewer than three inspections were eliminated -49- image: ------- TABLE 4-1 Inspection ft Test Sanples In OSHA Inspection Data: SIC 2812 Alkalies and Chlorine Inspection No. 1 2 3 4 5 Substances Sampled (Substance-Inspection Unit) aniline nitrobenzene chlorine chlorine hydrogen chloride hydrogen sulflde mercury sulfur dioxide sulfurlc add mercury dimethyl hydrazlne All Inspections I of Test Sanples 4 4 12 2 1 1 29 4 1 10 1 69 Mean* Severity Level 0.02 o.zn 1.10 0.00 n.oo 0.17 0.58 0.08 0.02 0.16 0.20 0.23 OSHA Hazard Weight for Substance 7 1 7 7 7 7 in i 7 in b • Each row 1s one substance-Inspection unit, sumarlzlng the test sanples taken for each substance during each Inspection. a Mean severity level 1s the average of the measured exposure levels divided by the Permissible Exposure Limit. No hazard weight given this substance. -51- image: ------- TABLE 4-2 Comparison of NIOSH and OSHA Industry Indexes Using NOHS for Exposure Data Industry Risk Index (IRI) OSHA Weighted Index (OWI) Comments Substances Included Hazard Rating: Criteria: Range: en ui Exposure Index for Substances: Duration of exposure: Level of exposure: Number of exposures: I7?l Chemicals common to NOHS and RTECS. No mixtures or processes. Rated by potency of chemical (size of dose) In producing certain health effects with the emphasis on ONA effects. 0.001 - 1.000 In Increments of 0.001; thus 1000 steps. Part-time (30 mln./wk to 4 hrs/day) Is weighted half of full-tine (4 or more hrs/day) exposure. Controlled exposures are weighted one tenth that of uncontrolled exposures. No Information on actual levels. Proportion of employees surveyed In the plant who are exposed full or part-tine. 954 substances common to NOHS and OSHA regulated substances. Represents About 450 regulated substances In various compounds. Rated by severity of effect. Irreversible effects In more than one organ system In humans or more than one animal species rate highest. 1 to 10 1n four steps 1.3.7,10. Part-time Is weighted one fifth of full-time exposures. No Information on actual levels of exposure. No consideration of controls. Same as IRI with different weighting of full and part time. All OUt chemicals are In NOHS-RTECS except coke oven funes or similar complex emissions. Full time exposures are weighted more heavily 1n the OSHA Weighted Index; however the majority of all exposures are part-time. The weighting of controls by the IRI may reduce the effect of controlled heavy Industry exposures and Increase the effect of uncontrolled exposures In services and trades. image: ------- TABLE 4-4 Cianples of SICs with High Ranks In Inspection • Rased Ciposvre Ratings (IBERs). 1/1 i SIC Raffle Mean Severity* Top 3321 3362 3691 3341 5093 3731 3523 2816 3325 3269 Top 3792 3433 1622 3341 3743 3253 3569 2A2I 3731 2879 Ten StCs on MedSublns fir ay Iron Fndry Brass, Bronie Fndry Storage Batteries 2* Nonferrous Met. Scrap A Waste, Wholesale Shipbuilding Farm Machinery Inorganic Pigments Steel Foundries Pottery Products NEC Ten SICs on NnSubs . Travel Trailers Heating Equip. Bridge, Tunnels 2* Nonferrous Net. Railroad Equip. Ceramic Tiles Industrial Machinery Plastics 1 Resins Shipbuilding Agricultural Chen. .70 1.10 2.93 3.01 1.S3 2.25 1.63 2.44 0.47 1.39 26.49 6.44 15.47 3.01 2.54 12.09 3.75 1.26 2.?5 2.37 Median I Subst. Severity .?5 .45 .69 .21 .79 0.17 0.20 0.83 0.19 1.02 .05 .OR .55 .21 .13 0.69 0.03 0.04 0.17 0.08 f Subst.- I Subst. Inspections with Exp^** HedSuhs 3fl 25 12 34 14 25 20 13 26 7 9 22 9 34 35 5 16 46 25 22 391 176 107 229 46 201 157 34 146 26 14 56 19 279 165 14 34 141 201 39 13 R 4 15 5 15 8 6 8 4 4 6 5 15 16 3 5 17 15 5 5 1 7 8 2 20 22 3 17 9 1R3 70 16 8 18 2« 179 59 70 75 Ranks of IRERs MedSublns HnSubs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 R 9 10 TOO 56 24 4 13 30 169 44 6 7R 28 26 19 4 37 12 21 73 71 84 1 2 3 4 5 9 10 11 12 13 NnSublns 9 14 7 1 30 2 10 77 32 58 4 5 B 1 3 16 27 15 2 25 •Severity Is the exposure measured as a proportion of the Permissible Exposure Limit. ••Number of substances where the maximum exposure observed Is 501 or more of the Permissible Exposure Limit. image: ------- TABLE 4-5 SANTA CLARA COUNTY INDUSIRIES RANKED BY EMPLOYMENT (>30O) WITH IIA/ARD RANKINGS SIC INDUSTRY -J I 3573 ELFCTRONIC COMPUTING 36/1 SEMICONDUCTORS 36/9 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS 3662 RADIO AND TV COMMUNIC. 82II ELEM. fc SECOND. SCHOOLS 3761 MISSILES, SPACE VEHICLES 5812 EAIING PLACES 8911 ENG. fc ARCH. SURVEYING 7391 HIS. fc DEV. LABS 8062 HOSPITALS 8?21 COLLEGES, UNIVfRSITItS 0169 IIORTIC. SPECIALTIES NEC 7399 BUSINESS SERVICES, NEC 3399 MACHINERY, NONELECTRIC 3823 INSTRUMENTS, MfAS. ELEC. 3199 NONDURABLE GOODS, NEC 5311 DEPT. STORES 3U63 ELECTRONIC PARIS. EQPT. 6331 RCAL ESTATE AGENTS 7372 COMPUTER PROGRAMMING 5111 GROCERY STORES 6023 NAT. BANKS, TRS MDRS. 3811 ENG. le LAB. INSTRUMENTS 739? MGMT.t PUBLIC REIATIONS 3661 TELEPHONE. 1ELEG. APPAR. 33H NEW ft USED CAR DEALERS 3631 RADIO AND TV RCG. SETS 1711 PLUMB. IIEAI, AIR CONDIT. (4213 TRUCKING, NON-LOCAL 7011 HOTELS fc MOTELS 1321 HOUSING CONSTRUC, 1 EAM. 8931 ACCT, AUDIT, BOOKKEEPING 6'lll INSURANCE SERVICES 73/1 DATA PROCESSING SVC. 1/11 ELECTRICAL WORK 3991 BROOMS AND BRUSHES 36/2 CATHODE RAY IEIEVISION 31)61 CUMMIHCIAL MACHINES 3623 PROCESS CONTROL INSIR. 3H/9 MISC. PLASTIC PRODUCIS 8922 NONCOMMIR. fl). Rl SEARCH 7393 DEI I CM VI ft PRO I EC I. SVC 3999 MISCELEANIOIJS RIIAII 736? TEMPORARY HI I P SUPPIY 7Vl9 BUDDING MAINIfNANCI 3'l29 HARDWARE, NIC 3/2'l AIRCKATT ENGINES k PARTS 3/11 MO I OR VIHICI IS 2033 CANNI O I RUMS AND VfCS 8059 NURSING, PI RS. CARI NIC nni M GAI si RVICI s 3999 MANIII AC HIRING INDUS I R |M I IIIRHINIS. (,I NIK A I OH SMS I BLR RANK 386 313 277 199 3B'l 3/'I 'I'll 180 127 133 118 1)01 367 117 1419 288 ill 1 1'l3 230 31(8 133 333 366 210 207 9 2H7 2JO 3;>0 III) •C.fl OWI RANK 293 120 159 321 157 581 135 29 Mil) IRI RANK 81 131 109 71 135 " 102 • 269 6'l8 592 317 706 628 585 675 260 135 • 139 39 • 195 16 • 510 588 '128 610 709 628 1 19 " 550 175 286 333 132 . . 185 138 267 175 . 78 , 115 35 215 230 . 171 15 233 . 129 263 58 87 38 28 71 361 llfl an 169 SC COUNTY EMPLOYMENT 70506 52187 23819 23075 20151 2O010 198*75 11620 11603 11272 10036 10003 7111 6337 6068 5917 5717 5121 5361 5267 5010 1891 1680 1199 1387 1288 1213 1015 3865 3808 3802 3612 3608 3561 3171 3320 3017 2913 2923 2888 2853 2821 2815 2803 2615 2602 2602 ?'.99 • i /• image: ------- TABLE 4-5 (conf d) SANTA CLARA COUNTY INOUSTRIfS RANKED BY EMPLOYMENT (>30O) Ui VŁ> I SIC 3H71 7395 2721 31)59 2879 59«|7 161 1 INDUSTRY IDFR RANK 6513 7231 8399 3296 208M 6512 8321 ?05 1 2751 2099 H6i| 1 0181 8051 8021 MB99 7? 16 5039 51'l9 7539 3'l'H 6519 0/82 8069 0/81 3699 5/13 3'i/9 fill? 3 ?M I 59'Hl ?lt I <) 5199 5161 5/1? 2651 /(,,") 5i|6? ;'(M5 PLATING AND POLISHING 98 PHOIOI INI SUING LADS 258 PFRIODICAIS, PUR ft PRIN. 'I'l'l SPEC I At I NOUS IRY MACII. 155 AGRICULTURAL CHEMICALS 2'l GIFT, NOVELIY, SHOPS HIGHWAY k S1RECI CONSIR. 37 IND. BLDGS. ft WAREHOUSES 119 OPERATORS OF APT. BLDGS. BFAUTY SHOPS l| 1 3 SOCIAL SERVICES NEC LOCAL TRUCK, W/ STORAGE MINERAL WOOL 123 WINES. ORANDY OPIR. OF NON-RES BLOCS. 058 INDIV. ft FAMILY SERVICES IIKFAD, CAKE, ft RM . PHD. 39'l COMMERCIAL PRINTING 235 FOOD PREPARATIONS, NEC 3'l5 CIVIC ft SOCIAL ASSOCS. T LOR I CULT. It NURSERY SKILIED NURS. CARE FACS. OTFICES OF DENTISIS COMMUNICAIION SfRVICE DRY CLEANING PLANTS I|9 CONSTRUCTION MAIFRIAI 291 GROCERIES, REL PROS NEC 399 WAIER, SfWER, PIPF LINES 8? AUIOMOTIVI REPAIR SHOPS 161 IAB. STRUCTURAL MFTAL ?8 IESSORS OF REAL PROP. LAWN ft GAROtN SERVICES SPIC. HOSPITAIS, X-PSY. 387 LANDSCAPE PING ft COUNS. RlIKIGERATFD WAREHOUSE MICTRICAI CQUIPMINT 376 TIOOR COVTRING SI ORES Mi IAI. COAT ING 65 Ml). BANKS, miC. NTRS CINfRAI WAREHOUSING 3IO ROOK Plini. I SUING 'l?9 JlWf I RY SIORfS INI) INORGANIC CIIFMS NIC 15 MISC GTN MlRCHAND S1ORTS CIIIMICAIS ft AM III) I'RDS 295 RADIO AND III I VISION CORRUG, SOI II) I Illl R IIOX 1? 1 IMCIKICAI RII'AIR SHOPS 26? Rl I All HAM KIIS I'lCKI I S. SAIICI S. SAI AD DR. HOOK SIORIS IJM I) Ml KCIIANDI SI SIORI S I I OK ISIS SIAII HANKS. IKS OWI RANK 76 135 388 107 UK 7 399 291 311 510 1)96 311 I4MO 6*1 530 636 359 100 1192 562 '188 5'l5 157 60 18 31 1 352 2H8 352 61 / ll/'l 5 6/5 61 / 6 5'l I 10 /16 656 I/'I II,') 'I'I / /'ill 191 6/5 IRI RANK 123 118 121 356 388 326 72 266 2M8 305 393 76 31(6 2i|6 107 SC COUNTY EMPLOYMENT 103M 1022 1017 101 7 1008 977 968 961 958 9'! 8 916 911 900 889 862 852 8?9 829 825 798 7/3 7/1 770 753 753 739 730 7?0 718 712 701 700 686 6/7 6 Ml 670 665 660 658 image: ------- TABLE 4-5 (cont'd) SANTA CLARA COUNTY INDUSTRIES RANKED BY EMPLOYMENT (>300) SIC INDUSTRY I HI R RANK 5085 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLIES 210 B?99 SCHOOLS, ED SVCS. NEC 5021 FURNITURE 1/93 CLASS AND GLAZING WORK 5331 VARIETY STORES 5003 SCRAP & WASTE MATERIAL 10 50>lt SPORTING k REC. GOODS 5H3 MUSIC STORES 5182 WINES. DISTILIED BEVS. 59'I9 SI WING, NEEDLEWORK 80/2 DINIAL IABORAIORIES 378 M/12 IRF.ICIIT FORWARDING 8351 CHILD DAY CARE CINTERS l|?26 SPFCIAL WAREHOUSING Ul9 50/2 HARDWARE ?on6 BOIILED, CAN SOFT DRINKS 13? 26117 SANITARY PAPER PRODUCT ?(|3'l WOOD KIICHtN CAB I NE IS 106 8331 JOB TRNG fc VOC REHAB '158 07112 VE1ERINARY SPECIAL1Y 5'I99 MISC FOOD STORFS 16?2 BRIDGE, 1NL, {LEV IIWY 5 1/91 SIKUCTURAL SIEIL ERICr. 2/3 I/Ml MASONRY, OTIIR STONEWORK 12/ 6331 HIU, MARINE, CAS. INS. 7332 BIUEPRINT., PHOTOCOPYING 2'l9 1/113 MRRA/ZO, II LI, MARBLE 3273 READY-MIXED CONCRf IE <458 6I'I3 SIA1E CREOI I UNIONS ?5'll WOOD PAR1IIIONS 316 5699 MISC APPAREL & ACCES. 0/?3 CHOP PRCP. SERVICIS /6'll Rl IIPHOl SIFR. , FURN. RPR 32/ 6361 I I III INSURANCE 5181 IUFR AND Al E 506't MICTRICAI APPI IANCFS 3??9 PRISSEI) AND BIOWN C.IASS ?9 365? PHONOGRAPH RlCOHDS 3M6 3'l69 Ml FAL SIAMPINGS, NEC 137 ?8?1 PIASriCS MAIIRIALS 15 3561 PUMPS fc PUMPING IQPT. 1/8 35/2 rYPCWRIURS 86?1 PROF. MfMUIRSHIP ORGS.. NO OAI A I OR HI IS SIC • RANKING IS IN III) IOP ?0% 01 All SICS HUM INSPI Cl ION HASH) I XPOSUHI KAMNC.S (IWI O'.IIA Wl If'.HI I I) INIII X IK I I NOUS III I Al KISK INDIX OWI RANK 175 582 653 125 591 395 598 602 681 50 70«l 617 263 Ii8l 187 5? 366 662 157 125 201 719 UlU 201 186 692 83 596 502 531 703 681 31/ IRI RANK 222 257 313 238 251 1 1 1 389 303 16 236 126 SC COUNTY EMPLOYMENT 384 383 378 37& 375 372 370 370 36H 361 360 359 356 355 352 351 350 ') 'l 39/ 27 1? 3'l7 338 338 330 327 32'l 32M 3?'l 3?3 3?0 320 318 316 3 I 'I 311 310 309 308 3(l/ 306 305 303 300 300 300 image: ------- 3499, 7216, 3255, and 3479, employ more than 500 persons in the county. In using these rankings there are a number of factors which must be considered. a) The data from which the IBER rankings were developed are federal OSHA data from states with no state plans. No computerized California data are available for comparison purposes. That is, there are no means available for determining whether the federal data is representative of California or Santa Clara industry. A substantial number of CAL/OSHA standards are stricter than federal OSHA standards 'and this may have an impact on exposure levels for those chemicals in California plants. Whether differences in geographical location, age of the industry, unionization patterns, type of inspections, employment size, company stability and profitability are important variables which would affect both the actual exposure levels and the relative ranking of industries remains to be determined. Until the State of California computerizes its compliance data or obtains environmental monitoring data from companies, these questions cannot be resolved. For the purpose of this report, we must assume that the national rankings have relevance to the local situation. b) There are inaccuracies in the N1OSH industrial file. The primary discrepancies include: identified companies actually being out of business or moved to another location, incorrect number of employees, or that the SIC code designation does not reflect the actual industrial process. Inaccurate SIC code designation can have significant implications when attempting to set priorities, e.g., compliance programming, and intervention strategies. For example, SICs 3341, secondary lead smelting, and 3691, battery manufacture, rank number 1 and 3 on the IBER list. and the NIOSH industrial file lists 4 establishments with 80 employees in SIC 334. and 4 establishments with 180 employees in SIC 3691 in Santa Clara County A telephone check of the 8 establishments identified in the NIOSH file indicated that there were no facilities which actually conducted manufacturing in Santa Clara County as designated by their SIC listing in Dun and Bradstreet. On the other hand, the NIOSH industrial files are the only employment data base available for developing industrial profiles and therefore must be used despite the presence of some inaccuracies. c) In some cases the SIC code designations are relatively broad and may not be sufficiently descriptive of the industrial process. Examples are those 4-digit SIC codes which end in the digit "9". The "9" designates miscellaneous four digit industries covering establishments "not elsewhere classified". These residual establishments do not usually constitute homogeneous primary activity groups. For example SIC 3079, miscellaneous plastics products, includes over 110 different products. Therefore, chemicals and exposures identified in a particular facility may not be representative of others with the same SIC code. Fourteen of the top 75 SICs fall into the miscellaneous category. While acknowledging the uncertainties described above, the 75 SICs represent those industries with a history of high exposures to multiple substances. Local or state official? therefore need to consider this list seriously when defining priorities and resource allocation even though the actual number of employees may be small. -64- image: ------- Low IBER ranking, but high exposure to one specific chemical Industries which ranked high in IBERS have two characteristics, namely high exposure^ to multiple substances. IBER rankings are weighted toward multiple exposures. There are industries, however, which have documented high exposures but only to a single substance. thereby constituting a highly significant exposure problem; since there is only a single substance, however, the IBER ranking is low. Table 4-7 lists the chemicals for which high individual exposures have been documented in the OSHA MIS but which fall outside of the top 75 SICs listed above. Santa Clara County employment and number of establish- ments are included in the Table. The criteria for inclusion in the table are a minimum of 3 inspections, a mean severity level greater than 1.0 (exposure equal to or greater than the PEL), and an IBER ranking higher than 75 (i.e., not on the 1-75 ranking list). For asbestos, a mean severity level of 0.25 was used since it is generally recognized that the current OSHA standard for asbestos is inadequate (9). More SICs would have been included if a lower severity level, e.g., 0.5, were selected. Five substances, lead, asbestos, chromium, coal tar pitch volatiles, and silica had SICs meeting the criteria outlined above. Twelve SICs on the list employ more than 1,000 persons in Santa Clara County. The other chemicals selected for analysis included mercury. manganese, cadmium, beryllium, arsenic, nickel, trichloroethylene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane. methylene chloride, ethylene dichloride, benzene, formaldehyde, toluene diisocyan- ate/methylene bis(phenylisocyanate), toluene, xylene, styrene, and perchlorethylene. No SICs were identified for these chemicals using the above criteria. They do not represent the entire list of substances regulated by OSHA, but do represent substances of recognized toxicity with a meaningful number of inspections in the federal file. 4.3.2.2 IRI and OWI Rankings for Santa Clara County. Tables 4-8 and 4-9 list the top industries in the IRI and OWI ranking systems. San::. Clara County employment is included in both tables. Both the IRI and OWI rankings are based on the use of NIOSH NOHS survey data to assess the chemicals in use in an indus- try and to estimate the number of workers exposed to a particular substance. NOHS considered all possible exposures to every substance visually spotted in workplaces during the survey. Because actual exposure levels were not measured, however, it is difficult to evaluate which of the chemicals NOHS found in a specific SIC actually present hazards. Nevertheless, the NOHS data consider a broad range of otherwise unreported substances and use of RTECS data in the IRI enables a potency rating for hundreds of compounds. A major problem with the NOHS data base for this particular project derives from its age. Much of the industry in Santa Clara County is new and, more importantly, reflects changing technology. Certainly the electronics industry as currently constituted is markedly different than in 1972-74 when the survey was conducted during the original NOHS survey. NIOSH visited only one establishment in SIC 3674. This establishment employed less than 100 persons and therefore was excluded by NIOSH when their IRI rankings were developed. Even if 3674 had been included the survey detected no arsine. phosphine, or other substances currently in use in the industry. Therefore, for the purposes of this survey, the OWI and IRI rankings are not entirely appropriate for several industries for Santa Clara County. The IRI and OWI ranking methods are most useful when listing industries which have not had major changes in chemical use during the past decade. The IRI data identify 28 SICs with more than 300 employees in the County and whL'h are in the top 20% IRI ranking of all SICs (Table 4-8). There are 44 SICs in "the OWI -65- image: ------- Industries Not Included In Hlgh-IRER Ranking with High Exposures for Selected Substances (continued) Substance SIC i CTi Lead 1711 1721 1731 1795 1744 2295 2865 3331 3412 3444 3452 3469 3484 3519 3535 3544 3569 3585 3613 3711 3728 3949 3993 4011 5082 5511 7535 753R 7692 a. IRFR - Inspection Rased Fxposure Rating b. nee * not elsewhere classified no data for this SIC Nun of Industry Insps Plumbing, heating, air condlt. Painting, paper hanging. decorating Electrical work Wrecking and demolition Special trade contractors nee Coated fabrics, not rubberized Cyclic crudes and Intermediates Primary zinc Plumbing fittings and brass goods Sheet metal work Bolts, nuts, rivets and washers Metal stampings, nee Small arms Internal combustion engines nee Conveyors and conveying equipment Special dies, tools General Industrial machinery nee Refrigeration and heating equip. Swltchgear and switchboard apparatus Motor vehicles and car bodies Aircraft equipment, nee Sporting and athletic goods nee Signs and advertising Railroads, line-haul operating Construction and mining machinery New A used car dealers Paint shops General automotive repair shops Welding repair 5 9 4 3 R 3 4 4 4 7 6 5 4 12 4 3 5 17 5 20 3 7 5 5 3 14 3 11 3 Mean proptn of PEL 1.31 1.62 3.63 1.75 7.26 1.01 2.44 1.15 1.74 1.25 1.0? 5.19 5.25 1.41 6.73 2.56 24.34 1.03 5.47 1.40 12.68 1.26 1.67 1.68 1.4? 2.07 2.20 1.7? 12.62 IRF.R Rank 117 111 214 175 154 116 103 131 181 85 120 89 121 177 139 88 87 91 114 100 234 166 189 10? 155 255 187 163 80 Hum of Firms in SC Cnty 340 196 * 286 11 218 • • • 1 90 8 19 2 2 7 32 21 4 9 10 3 34 18 ? n 103 16 451 47 Num em- plyd in SC Cnty 4015 1125 3471 134 1334 • • • 2 1S21 59 305 5 6 50 528 405 42 190 2549 10 203 144 4? 166 4?88 131 1717 245 image: ------- TABLE 4-8 (cont'd) INDUSIRIES RANKED IN TOP 20% Of INDUSIRIAL RISK INDEX (IRI)2 I image: ------- TABLE 4-9 (cont'd) INDUSTRIES RANKfO IN TOP 20% OF OSHA WEIGHTED INDEX (OWI) 7538 7539 3562 2/51 2599 3915 SIC OESCR 333'! PRIMARY ALUMINUM 7251 SHOE REPAIR. HAT CLEANING 3955 CARBON PAPIR, RIBBONS 7531 TOP AND ItODY REPAIR TIRE REIREADNG. REPAIR PAINT SHOPS GENERAL AUTO REPAIR AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR,NEC BAIL AND ROLLER BEARINGS COMMERCIAL PRINTING FURNITURE FIXFURIS NEC JLWFLLERS1 MATERIALS PAPER COATING. GLAZES 1'). 1 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 9 H 0 7 7 I) 1 9 9 9 7 M 3 2 3 ? (4 3 8 'l 7 2 "1 9 / 7 7 5 2 0 6 0 9 8 l| '1 / / 5 1 1) / IRI H IBI RANK RATH IN 369 m 62 • _ _ . . _ 17 • 72 • 205 _ 1*6 • _ 3 " 229 2 • 9 • . 123 . 260 272 . . 126 66 • 235 88 302 188 . 82 1/9 96 366 1 // 189 50 « 132 IVi Oil 121 TO 2 6 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 t 0 0 0 0 . 2 0 i| 1 6 0 2 t 0 3 2 l| 0 l| 0 0 O •> 0 ? (1 II 0 S.C. COUN1Y EMPLOYMENT 103 I'l II 10 35 131 1717 718 83 829 130 6 100 23 5 t 109 / 135 18 1034 M65 182 1'l25 163 318 231 38M '40 552 in 65 39 3 2350 92 7/0 I'l 6337 105 3'l /"I ?(,', 101 / image: ------- within these same parameters (Table 4-9). Twelve SICs, 7391, 5511, 4932, 5541, 2752, 172! 2834, 2751, 3479, 3544, 2821 and 7699 are in the top 20% ranking of both systems. While recognizing the limits of these data bases, these industries were found to have a large number of hazardous chemicals with a significant number of employees potentially exposed. Additional investigations of these industries may be appropriate. Many SICs with substantial employment and high rankings in IRI or OWI had low IBER rankings. It is instructive to contrast two SICs, 3573 (electronic computing) and 3679 (electronic components) since they are large employers in Santa Clara County, rank in the top 20% of the IRI and OWI respectively, and are low in the IBERS. In 3573 (electronic computing), federal OSHA conducted 27 inspections during the period 1979-82 and sampled for 20 substances. There were no overexposures and the measured exposures were very low. These data reflect very few inspections and thus must be viewed with caution, but there is no obvious pattern of overexposure. In 3679 (electronic components), there was a significantly greater number of inspections, 252, during the same period of time and the data indicate that there were occasional overexposures to lead, mercury, trichloroethylene, copper, hydrogen chloride, isopropyl alcohol, manganese, tetrahydrofuran, and silica. A low IBER ranking does not, therefore, imply that there were no. overexposures and that the particular SIC should be eliminated from further consideration. A low ranking may indicate that there was not a systematic pattern of overexposure. More in depth analysis of the compliance data should be undertaken in cases where there is a low IBER ranking but a high rank on IRI/OWI and/or high employment. An in-depth evaluation of the compliance data would permit a determination of whether the identified overexposures occurred in a single establishment or if overexposure was a consistent pattern. The advantage of using the OSHA compliance data is that where there are a large number of inspections within a SIC, more detailed analysis will reveal the characteristics of the exposures, including exposure by job title. Based on these considerations, industries in Santa Clara County with high employment patterns and a high ranking in the OWI or IRI should be given a high priority for further investigation especially if they also are high on the IBER ranking. 4.3.2.3 Overlap Among IRI, OWI, and IBER's While recognizing the limitations of the OWI and IRI for this report, we have chosen to determine OWI/IRI overlap with the IBER rankings in the belief that substantial overlap between systems constitutes a reasonable approach to identifying hazardous industries. If an industry appears on the top of several lists, it indicates that there is a history of high exposures to a number of highly toxic substances and that a significant number of workers are thought to be exposed. With no consideration of employment in Santa Clara County, there were 71 SICs that appeared in the top 20% of at least three out of the four composite IBER listings (Table 4-6). Of these 71, 10 SICs also appeared in the top 20% of the IRI listing of SICs, and 2o were in the top 20% of the OWI list. There were 8 SICs that were in the top 20°o of all three lists, 2821, 3731, 3715, 2851, 3269, 7699, 3479, and 3411 (Table 4-6). Of the 28 remaining SICs, 5 have no employment in Santa Clara County. The two largest SICs, 1761 and 7699, are characterized by being mainly small in individual company employment size. e.g., 142 of 150 establishments in SIC 1761 employ less than 50 persons and 250 of 252 establishments in SIC 7699 employ less than 50. The SICs identified as being high in both IBERS and either OWI or IRI represent industries deserving of follow-up to determine whether similar patterns of exposure found in federal OSHA inspections are common to Santa Clara County. -73- image: ------- TABLE 4-10 Worker Overexposure Citations in Santa Clara County from CAL/OSHA Inspection Files 1979-84 SIC Company Standard Violated Substance * Inspec Year 2649 Tag Industries Inc. 2879 Moyer Chemical Co. 3522 FMC Airline Equip. Div, 367 ** Powell Electronics 3'842 Hosmer Dorrance 5161 Jones Chemical Co. 8062 Santa Teresa Community Hospital 5141(a) 5155(b) 3272 Sakrete 5141(a) 3296 Owens Corning Fiberglass 5141(b) 341 ** Lorentz Barrel & Drum 5155(c) 3489 FMC Ordnance Division 5155(b) 5155(b) 5141(a) 5155(c) 5155(c) 5141(a) 5141(c) 5155(c) nuisance dust 1983 parathion, methyl 1979 parathion silica 1982 silica. 1980 solvent mixture 1981 total dust, 1980 alum, welding fume nuisance dust 1980 trichloroethylene 1982 trichloroethylene 1981 phosgene, hydrogen 1982 chloride gas formaldehyde 1981 * 5141 m Control of Harmful Exposure to Employees 5155 - Airborne Contaminants ** no 4-digit SIC-code available -75- image: ------- able 4-11. Industries Ranked Potentially Hazardous In .Santa Clara County by Federal SHA/HIOSH Data Rases.' SIC 542 611 622 623 579 711 771 731 743 752 761 791 793 799 086 434 541 751 752 819 821 834 879 079 229 317 441 444 469 471 479 499 511 544 545 559 561 569 573 599 652 662 674' 679 769 811 999 932 081 084 093 511 541 216 349 391 394 395 397 399 538 539 699 1021 :06? 071 1072 7TW Description Nonresldential construction, nee. Highway and street construction. Bridge, tunnel, and elevated highway. Water, sewer, and utility lines. Heavy construction, nee. Plumbing, heating, air conditioning. Painting, paper hanging, decorating. Electrical work. Terrazzo, tile, marble, mosaic work. Floor laying and floor work, nee. Roofing and sheet metal work. Structural and steel erection. Glass and glazing work. Special trade contractors, nee. Rottled and canned soft drinks. Wood kitchen cabinets. Wood partitions and fixtures. Commercial printing, letterpress. Commercial printing, lithographic. Industrial Inorganic chemicals, nee. Plastics materials and resins. Pharmaceutical preparations. Agricultural chemicals, nee. Miscellaneous plastics products. Pressed A blown glass, nee. Blast furnaces A steel mills. Fabricated structural metal. Sheet metal work. Metal stampings, nee. Plating 1 Polishing Metal coating A allied services Fabricated metal products, nee. Turbines A Turbine generator sets. Special dies, tools, digs. A fixtures. Machine tool accessories. Special Industry machinery, nee. Pumps A pumping equipment. General Industrial machinery, nee. Electronic computing equipment. Machinery, except electrical. Phonograph records. Radio A TV communication equipment. Semiconductors A related devices. Electronic components nee. Space vehicle equipment, nee. Engineering A scientific instruments. Manufacturing Industries, nee. Gas A other services combined. Comerdal machines A equipment. Industrial machinery A equipment. Scrap A waste materials. New A used car dealers. Gasoline service stations. Dry cleaning plants, except rug. Building maintenance services, nee. Research A development laboratories. Equipment rental. Photoflnlshlng laboratories. Commercial testing laboratories. Business services, nee. General automotive repair shops. Automotive repair shops. Repair services, nee. Office of dentists. General medical A surgical hospitals. Medical laboratories. Hentil laboratories. T employees In the county. Ranked High 1r No of Fmpl IRFB6 OUTC IOId 1279 96R * 330 * 770 430 4015 • 1175 * 3471 * 323 * 4R4 * 1425 • • 377 * 376 * 1334 * 351 • 349 * 318 * fl?Q * * 1652 * * 636 * 303 * • 1097 • * 100R 7RRR 307 394 712 * 1571 305 1034 * 660 • * * 552 • » 2350 * 52R * • 3R4 * 1017 * 300 405 * 70.S06 • 6337 * 306 * 73,075 57..1R7 23.849 • 465 * 4680 * 2375 • 7307 * * 7943 * 1123 372 • 47RR * • 7774 • • 753 2K45 • 14,603 * • 1465 • 1077 • 1735 7111 * 1717 71R • 1043 « • • 770 ' • 14,277 4«? • 360 i Spec Chen * * • * » • * * * • • * '• Inspection Rased on Exposure Ratings • ™» • yi,w i image: ------- TABLE 4-12 Substances Contributing to High IRER Ranks for Selected SICs. SIC 1542 1611 1622 1623 1629 1711 1721 1731 1743 1752 1761 1791 1793 1799 2086 2434 1 Substances 1 Substances Sampled by Substances with Levels at or over PFL Industry 1n OWIa OSHAb Found 1n OSHA Inspections0 Presidential 282* construction. n.e.c. Highway ft street 192* construction Bridge, tunnel 222* ft elevated highway Water, sewer ft 222* utility lines Heavy construction, 222* n.e.c. PlunMng, heating 219* ft air conditioning Painting, paper 154* hanging, deco- rating Electrical work 235* Terrazzo, tile, 203* marble, mosaic work Floor laying ft 150* floor work, n.e.c. Roofing ft sheet 22fi* metal work Structural ft steel 225* erection Glass ft glazing 225* work Special trade 225* contractors, n.e.c. Bottled ft canned 21A soft drinks Wood kitchen 705 cabinets 11 1. 5 15 1. 11 1. 27 1. 31 1. 2. 37 1. 2. 13 1. 1 10 25 1. 13 1 11? 1. 2. 3. 11 1. 22 1. 2. silica 2. asbestos lead arsenate 2. silica asbestos silica asbestos 3. chromates lead 4. copper funes silica 3. lead total dust lead coal tar pitch volatlles lead 4. asbestos silica 5. nuisance dust total dust 6. toluene lead wood dust, hardwood toluene -79- image: ------- TABLE 4.12 (cont'd) SIC 2541 2751 275? 2819 2821 2834 2879 3079 3229 331? I Substances t Substances Sampled hy Substances with Levels at or over PFL Industry 1n n«Ia OSHAb Found 1n OSHA Inspections0 Wood partitions ft 217 13 fixtures Commercial printing, ?fiO 81 letterpress Commercial printing, 242 88 lithographic Industrial Inorganic 472 94 chemicals, n.e.c. Plastics materials * 25« 137 resins Pharmaceutical 35fi IS preparations Agricultural ino 90 chemicals, n.e.c. Misc. plastics 419 208 •products Pressed ft blown 2fl 38 glass, n.e.c. Blast furnaces A 388 105 steel mills -80- 1. ?« 1. ?. 1. ?. 3. 1. ?. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 1. 1. 2. 3. 4. 1. ?. I. 4. 5. «. 1. ?, 1. 2. 3. 4. R. fi. 7. lead arsenate Isopropyl alcohol lead arsenate ?>nutanone (MF.K) lead silica 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. toluene Isopropyl alcohol toluene total dust nuisance dust hydrogen chloride ^ vinyl chloride lead arsenate lead silica toluene-?. 4- image: ------- TABLE 4-12 (cont'd) SIC 3441 3444 3469 3471 3479 3499 I Substances 1 Substances Sampled hy Substances with Levels at or over PFL Industry 1n OWIa OSHAh Found 1n OSHA Inspections0 Fabricated 265 structural metal Sheet metal work 228 Metal stampings. 767 n.e.c. Plating * ?57 polishing Metal coating and 165 allied services Fabricated metal 275 111 1. ?. 3. 4. 5. 6. 73 1. ?. 3. 56 1. 103 1. 2. 3. 4. 122 1. ?. 3. 88 1. 2. lead lead arsenate zinc oxide fumes silica xylene nuisance dust lead arsenate copper fumes nuisance dust lead arsenate silica lead arsenate total dust trlchloro- ethylene silica coal tar pitch volatiles zinc chloride fume lead Iron oxide 7. 8. 9. in. 4. 5. 6. 5. 6. 7. 4. 5. fi. 4. 5. copper funes total dust manganese * cnprls Iron oxide funes Iron oxide funes manganese * cnpds lead copper dusts hydrogen chloride chronates xylene chronic acid toluene-?, 4-di isocyanate (TOI) Zinc oxide fune copper fune fume 3. xylene 3511 Turbines & ?34 turbine generator sets 3544 Special dies, tools. 254 jigs 4 fixtures 3545 Machine tool accessories 3559 Special Industry machinery, n.e.c. 3561 Pumps A pumping eqpt. 3569 Gen. Industrial machinery, n.e.c. 254 1*4 211 29fi 252 20 48 57 90 48 1. 1. 1. 2. 1. cobalt silica lead silica lead 2. cutting oil nist 2. lead 3. Iron oxide funes 4. nuisance dust . chromic add A chromates -81- image: ------- TABLE 4-12 (conf d) SIC 3573 3509 3652 3662 3674 3679 3711 3769 3811 3999 4932 5081 5084 5093 5511 5541 5921 5999 7216 * Substances 1 Substances Sampled by Substances with Levels at or over PFI Industry In OWIa OSHA15 Found 1n DSHA Inspections0 El«ctron1c computing equipment Machinery, except electrical, n.e.c. Phonograph records Radio 4 TV communi- cation equipment Semiconductors 4 related devices Electronic components, n.e.c. Motor vehicles * car bodies Space vehicle eqpt., n.e.c. Engineering 4 scientific eqpt. Manufacturing Industries, n.e.c. Gas A other. services combined Comnerlcal machines * eqpt. Industrial machinery X eqpt. Scrap 4 waste materials New 4 used car dealers Gasoline service stations Liquor stores M1sc. retail stores Dry .cleaning- m 269 66 362 47 379 241 23 347 247 226* 226* 226* 134* 253* 148* 87* 93* 176* 42 80 1. silica 2. lead 3. nuisance dust 4 86 1. lead 2. chromic acid 4 128 1. lead ?. Isopropyl alcohol 171 1. nuisance dust 2. lead arsenate 17.8 1. lead 2. lead arsenatp 3. chromic acid A chronates 8 63 1. nuisance dust 82 1. toluene 12 2 43 1. lead arsenate 2. lead 57 1. lead arsenate 3 2 in 1. tetrachloroeth; 4. Iron oxide fune 5. chromic acid n chronates chronates 3. tetrachloro ethyl ene 4. Iron oxHe fune 3. copper dusts 4. Isopropyl alcohol- 4. nethylene blsphenyl isocyanate (MOD 2. lead arsenate 2. styrene 3. copper fune 4. iron oxide fune 2. toluene ylene plants, except rugs -82- image: ------- TABLE 4-12 (cont'd) i Substances I Substances Sampled by Substances with Levels at or over PEL 1n OWI* OSHAb Found 1n OSHA Inspections0 SIC Industry 7349 Building 120* maintenance services, n.e.c. 7391 Research & 331* development laboratories 7392 Management & public 331* relations 12 7394 7395 7397 7399 7538 7539 7699 8011 8021 8062 8071 8072 8111 8931 i. b. c. Equipment rental Photof1n1sh1ng laboratories Commercial testing laboratories Business services, n.e.c. Ren. automotive repair shops Automotive repair shops Repair services, n.e.c. Offices of physicians Offices of dentists 331* 331* 331* 331* 179* 179* 221* 11«* 43* Gen. Medical A 444* surgical hospitals Medical laboratories Dental laboratories Legal services Accounting, auditing, A bookkeeping Total substances per Total substances per Listed 1n descending 102* 102* 75* 74* SIC 1n SIC rep order b fi 12 70 47 4? l. lead 3. lead arsenate 2. Iron oxide funes Sfi 10 %4 1. lead 2. lead arsenate 1. lead 3. asbestos 2. Iron oxide fumes 1. formaldehyde 2. ethrane . xylene The OSHA Weighted Index 1s calculated only for 3-d1g1t SIC's 1n Industries (010 to 179 and 400 to 900). Therefore thi» number of substances will be the same for any normanufactuHng SIC whose first 3 digits are the sane. -83- image: ------- 4.5 Discussion The development of industry ranking schemes has not yet been discussed in the con- text of how the information is to be used in Santa Clara County. The six uses of informa- tion include: 1) intervention; 2) tracking of exposure or control of exposure over time; 3) planning; 4) research; 5) as a complement to disease surveillance; and 6) standard setting. 4.5.1 Intervention. Where an exposure is determined to be excessive, such that violation of standards exist or there is documented illness, intervention by appropriate authorities is highly relevant. The possible intervening agencies in Santa Clara County include CAL/OSHA, NIOSH, Department of Health Services (HESIS and Epidtmiologic Studies Unit), and the occupa- tional health section within the Santa Clara County Health Department. For these agencies the approach to industry ranking may be different from one using the information for other purposes, e.g., research. Industries which have substantial employment in the county and a history of high measured exposures should have the highest priority for follow-up and resource allocation. Industries which rank high in the IBERS or have documented high exposures to particular agents should be given the highest priority by the intervening agency. Even industries which are small employers may require a high priority if exces- sive exposures are anticipated. Where the potentially important SIC is made up of a large number of small employers the intervention may be conducted in two phases, a problem identification phase followed by an extensive education campaign or a requirement for environmental and biological monitoring. Those industries high in the OWI or IRI but having low measured exposures would not be a high priority for an intervention agency. For example, CAL/OSHA's compliance effort is not likely to have a major impact on industries in which the measured exposure levels are low. The semiconductor industry is an obvious case in point. Regulatory agencies generally are guided by their promulgated standards and have less flexibility in circumstances where the measured exposures are low. 4.5.2 Tracking of exposures over time. All the approaches developed for ranking industry are appropriate here, and all the agencies previously defined will have an interest in this category. Presumably CAL/OSHA or the county has the lead in establishing baseline conditions, i.e. determining the degree of exposure in a particular industry at a particular time. No agency has the resources to continually monitor exposures in each industry with suspected problems over time and that is why CAL/OSHA conducts spot checks, (surprise) inspections, on an ongoing basis. Unfortunately, that approach leaves great gaps in the data available. The burden for ongoing monitoring could be undertaken by the affected establishments. CAL/OSHA or Santa Clara County could establish requirements for environmental monitoring by industry or by specific chemical. Such rules would spell out the chemicals required to be monitored, the levels at which monitoring needs to be initiated, e.g., at some "action level", reporting requirements, and other provisions which enable the tracking of chemical exposure over time while placing limited burdens on the affected industries. Under such a program, industries would have to report use of certain chemicals limited to those with significant toxicity, e.g., lead, silica, and carcinogens, and report the monitoring results to the agency. A major role of regulatory bodies would then be to review the monitoring results and do spot checks on the adequacy of the monitoring programs. -84- image: ------- 4.5.3 Planning. The agencies involved in planning are very wide ranging and include CAL/OSHA, Department of Health Services, Santa Clara County Health Department, local planning agencies, hospitals, clinics etc. Planning can include assessing clinical services available to handle a catastrophic event, such as a chemical explosion or uncontrolled release, emergency room capability, planning of health services within an industry, e.g., medical screening, biological monitoring, and routine medical capability, to resource allocation and the planning of inspection priorities by CAL/OSHA. The role of the County in the plan- ning to address catastrophes and accidents is especially important. The industry ranking schemes which focus on industries with a history of high exposures are relevant to all agencies involved in health planning. However, the limitations of the data bases are such that we do not believe that the ranking systems defined here are as yet adequate for a systematic approach to health care planning. This area requires specific follow-up subsequent to this report. Specific planning around crisis intervention, emergency room facilities, and response to catastrophic events deserves special attention given that certain industries use large quantities of highly toxic materials. 4.5.4 Research. The principal agencies concerned with conducting research in workplace settings are NIOSH, Department of Health Services, the Northern and Southern Occupational Health Centers, and to a limited extent, CAL/OSHA. The relevance of the ranking schemes to researchers depends on the nature of the specific research objective. Identification of industries with significant exposures to regulated chemicals with well-known health effects may be of little interest to the researcher whose goal is to discover new etiologic relationships in industries with excess morbidity or mortality. On the other hand, use of the NIOSH NOHS data, to identify unregulated chemicals for research purposes, may be of particular value. Therefore, the IRI and OWI rankings may have special significance to the researcher. Data from the OSHA MIS does have relevance to the researcher who is assessing the adequacy of a particular standard insofar as he/she wishes to study expo- sures below the current standards. For example, an industry with a history of exposures to particular solvents at levels below the OSHA standard may be an important environment in which to study the long term CNS effects of low level exposure. The utility of the rankings for the researcher therefore ultimately depend on the specific research hypothesis. 4.5.5 Complement to Disease Surveillance. Rankings which focus on "specific chemicals" as opposed to multiple exposures are most appropriate here. Identification of industries with a history of exposure to lead represents a good example of the use of the ranking systems in combination with disease surveillance/biological monitoring programs. 4.5.6 Standard setting. Use of the OSHA MIS data to estimate the number of workers exposed to a particular substance and to assess the magnitude of that exposure are two important aspects of standard setting. Use of the information to identify populations at risk below the standard also represent an important application of the information. The NOHS based information has utility here insofar as it identifies user populations not identified by the OSHA MIS -85- image: ------- and may be used to provide estimates of the number of workers exposed to a particular chemical. CAL/OSHA would be the prime user of ranking methods for standard setting purposes. The following section of this report consists of detailed profiles of six industries which, using the criteria and methods discussed above, are among those Santa Clara County industries which should serve as a focus for future regulatory and research efforts. REFERENCES 1. Froines J. R., Dellenbaugh, C. A., Seabrook, S. S., and Wegman, D. H., "A Profile of Occupational Health Experience in Los Angeles County.", Report to the Department of Health Services, State of California, 1984. 2. National Occupational Hazard Survey: Survey Analysis and Supplemental Tables. DHEW (NIOSH) Publication No. 78-114. Washington, D.C.: Govt. Printing Office, 1977. 3. National Occupational Hazard Survey: Survey Manual. DHEW (NIOSH) Publication No. 74-727. Washington, D.C.: Govt. Printing Office, 1974. 4. Mendeloff J. "An Analysis of OSHA Health Inspection Data." Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress, 1983. 5. Division of Surveillance, Hazard Evaluations, and Field Studies (NIOSH): NOHS- RTECS Model for Identification of High Risk Industrial and Occupational Groups. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 83-117. Washington, D.C.: Govt. Printing Office, 1983. 6. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances, 1980 Edition. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 83-107-3. Wash- ington, D.C.: Govt. Printing Office, 1983. 7. Office of Compliance Planning (OSHA): Appendix A: Health Inspection Plan, OSHA Instruction CPL 2.25B, 1981. 8. Froines, J., Wegman, D., Dellenbaugh, C. "An Approach to the Characteristics of Silica Exposure in U.S. Industry". Submitted to American Journal of Industrial Medicine. -86- image: ------- 5, INDUSTRY PROFILES The six industry profiles presented in this section are intended to convey a general understanding of the chief processes and key occupational health hazards in each industry, and to review in detail the exposure data for each industry provided by the major databases consulted for this report, as described in Section 4. Specifically, the profiles make use of 1) the NIOSH Industrial File, giving employment demographics in Santa Clara County for each industry; 2) the NIOSH National Occupational Hazard Survey (NOHS) and/or the NIOSH National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES), identifying hazardous substances used in each industry, and the NIOSH Industry Risk Index and the OSHA Weighted Index rankings of each industry based on NOHS data; 3) federal OSHA inspection data, 1979-82, and the IBER ranking derived from these data; 4) CAL/OSHA inspection data; and 5) NIOSH Health Hazard Evaluations. In addition, the profiles review occupational illness statistics from relevant databases maintained by the California Division of Labor Statistics and Research (DLSR) which are described in Section 2. We note that in using DLSR statistics, categorizations of industry (e.g. "government" vs. "non-government") were modified to allow certain comparisons with the NIOSH Industrial File, and therefore do not reflect designations in DLSR publications. Due to differences in the availability or applicability of data from a given source for a given industry, the particular data sources used in each profile vary. In selecting industries for profiles, we sought industries which are relatively large employers in the county, and which, by virtue of the hazards present, merited a more detailed discussion. Each industry profiled employs at least 1,000 workers in the county and together these industries represent about 102,000 employees, or roughly 16% of the total Santa Clara County workforce. Each industry profiled has also been identified from the data sources reviewed as a source of significant actual or potential worker exposures to hazardous materials, or of important unresolved occupational health issues. The six industries are not intended to represent all major hazardous industries in the county, however, nor do they represent all suitable targets for further regulatory or research endeavor. Rather, the profiles are offered as a starting point for selecting priorities and focusing occupational health efforts in the county. -87- image: ------- 5.1 Semiconductors and Related Devices (SIC 3674) 5.1.1 Introduction The semiconductor industry is profiled based on its high contribution to Santa Clara County employment, and extensive use of hazardous materials. The semiconductor industry presents certain unique considerations in terms of occupational health. It is a fairly new, expanding, and technically innovative industry, involving certain processes developed specifically for its own use. New processes and materials usage have resulted in an occupational environment with many previously uncharacterized exposures and their corresponding potential health risks. The industry has been the focus of a special CAL/OSHA task force in 1981, of a NIOSH-directed health hazard study of the electronics industry, also in 1981, of a NIOSH Control Technology assessment in 1982-84, and of various analyses made by individual occupational health professionals, some of which have been collected in a 1986 one-volume review (LaDou). 5.1.2 Santa Clara County Demographics of the Semiconductor Industry Semiconductors and related devices -- SIC 3674 -- contains the second highest employment of any industry in Santa Clara County listed in the 1985 NIOSH Industrial File, with a total employment of 52,187, about 8% of the county's workforce. The vast majority (85%) of people employed by the industry in the county work in firms with 250 or-more employees, while 11% are employed by firms with between 50 and 249 employees. and 4% by firms with fewer than 50 employees. Altogether, there are a total of 265 semiconductor companies in the county, of which 32 (12%) employ 250 or more people, 52 (20%) employ between 50 and 249 people, and 181 (68%) employ fewer than 50 people. The ten largest firms together employ 33,210 people, or over 60% of the county's semi-conduciui workforce. The semiconductor industry is atypical of manufacturing industries as a whole, in that a large percentage of total employees in a firm do not work in fabrication or production. In the 1980-81 CAL/OSHA study of the semiconductor industry, a survey of 42 semiconductor firms found 29.9% of workers to be involved in fabrication and maintenance operations. In the four in-depth control technology surveys of semiconductor plants performed by NIOSH and published in 1984, the ratio of production to non-production workers was stated as substantially higher, ranging from 52% to 65%; but not all workers included in production totals for these plants worked in clean rooms or actual fabrication areas. Thus, a significant proportion of the total worker population in semiconductor plants is not directly at risk of exposure from fabrication-related hazards. Among fabrication workers, most are young (18-30 years old), and many are female: one source estimates that women comprise 75% of the production workforce in the electronics industry as a whole, though not specifically of the semiconductor industry/^ 5.1.3 Semiconductor Fabrication The dominant products of the semiconductor industry in Santa Clara County are discrete and integrated circuit (1C) devices. Production of these microelectronic circuits -88- image: ------- involves the formation of electron-pair bonds (electrodes) in a wafer of silicon or other material. Some establishments also produce the wafer material and wafers to be used as substrates for the microcircuit. Though highly complex and varied, the basic processes of microcircuit fabrication involve 1) preparing the wafer, 2) creating circuit patterns on the wafer by photochemical processes, 3) etching the circuit patterns on the wafer, 4) "doping1 the circuit patterns with ions to produce the electron-pair bonds which compose the circuit. 5) depositing patterns of aluminum or other conductive material on the wafer to connect the circuits and provide contacts for attaching leads, 6) cutting the wafer into chips, 7) encapsulating the chips in ceramic, and 8) attaching metal leads. During various stages of this process, the wafer is cleaned by chemicals or water. Each part of the process is associated with specific hazards. A flow chart of semiconductor processes is shown in Figure 5.1-1. 5.1.4 Potential Exposures In the 1974 National Occupational Hazard Survey (NOHS), until 1985 the most comprehensive systematic evaluation of occupational hazards in U.S. industries, only a single firm in SIC 3674, with a total employment of 25, was surveyed. Consequently, the Industry Risk Index (IRI) and the OSHA Weighted Index (OWI), both derived from NOHS data, had no numerical ranking value for this industry. The more recent NIOSH National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES) more thoroughly assessed selected industries initially included in the NOHS. NOES data were collected for 14 firms in SIC 3674, employing, collectively, 56,092 people. The survey characterized the number and percentage of workers in surveyed firms potentially exposed to 301 chemicals, mixtures, and processes identified in the industry. Results of this survey are shown in Table 5.1-1. The substances to which the highesi percentage of workers were found to be potentially exposed were isopropyl alcohol (4.23c!oi. hydrogen fluoride (hydrofluoric acid, 3.99%), hydrogen peroxide (2.63%), hydrochloric acid (2.56%) and nitrogen (2.49%). The list does not yet contain the ingredients of trade name products. NIOSH has only recently begun to receive information on trade name material. The 1981 CAL/OSHA Semiconductor Industry Study, and the 1980-81 NIOSH Hazard Assessment of the Electronic Component Manufacturing Industry (published 1985) similarly recite an extensive list of hazards involved in various processes of manufacture, though not as up to date as the NOES. The CAL/OSHA study collected information from a questionnaire survey of 60 Santa Clara and San Mateo County semiconductor manufacturers, combined with in-depth industrial hygiene evaluations of 13 voluntarily participating firms. A summary of types of potential hazards and affected job categories found in the CAL/OSHA study is shown in Table 5.1-2. The NIOSH study relied on literature reviews and on walk-through surveys (i.e., in which no monitoring was performed). Eight semiconductor plants were surveyed. A list of materials used or generated in semiconductor manufacture taken from the NIOSH study is shown in Table 5.1-3. This list lacks the NOES breakdown of the percentage of workers who actually work with or near these materials, but does show their association with specific processes. -89- image: ------- I VŁ) O I II Ml •Alii AwroiiiM IICH • Clit AIT OH HA nuAiMim •ASIIHAIII IIIAIUIII IMIf 1 HII lAiH ^ fNOIOHiilU P COAI f Mil III lirosum 1IAO AIIACH ruoi at „ * Al am mi a i or »ii IACM OllOf IICH „ •ICIH i „ j in Cl 0 fiir MTl t rHOIOHiilil Slllf IA1IA1 OWIH IfAHI OSIIIOII IQH uuiiaM WA| IN lift , M s ic ; Ct a •f ** E5 *s c« Hi 25 S ^J °s Figure 5.1-1 Steps in Semiconductor Wafer Fabrication Source: Hazard Assessment of the Electronic Component Manufacturing Industry (NIOSIl, 19O5) image: ------- Table 5.1-1 NIOSH National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES) as of Jan. 17, 19R6, far SIC 3674, Semiconductors and Related Devices i VO NUMBER OF PLANTS SURVEYED NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES ON PAYROLL SMALL MEDIUM LARGE TOTAL SMALL MEDIUM LARGE TOTAL 4 3 7 14 151 709 55232 56092 image: ------- C U.//. 3.1-1 \e. i 1CT-L . *-•-1- .<>! .23 .»."-?- .1-0 .00 f'"A2A"fc~r>"i)6"sc'' jPTi'iVf **• JO PRESCRIPTION AVAILABLE ** J-»lG<4 X"OI 1 •10 IP 70 * * * • • * AVAILABLf • * * * XOulO ,OJ .PC * » * * ** » * .n 2« ,7 .30 .On .00 . ii AVilLAhLE 3156ft Jl«70 ...0.1. 33? Si .. -.. 2.30 .jr. 573 43 "915" 37 ESTEW .00 ACTIVATOP. i vo M I _ JI075 JI07« I" U? 05 17 51 .01 ..M. II .00 r:UUPER-BASE V . .«.?». IS2SO 259 "5 39b AL .00 "oo :.LL'lo I Ib •17570 D75»0 35«S5 12 7«? "bi" ..18. .o« Ap5EMC too"" "A u"."' COLO -' «F"" u"N" K"^ 5Wfi ''"oh" 19 2? r _ at vi i I-I--.-T "' • image: ------- .f*n.. rL* •??Ł*.?I:.«t. Ci-oJ.fi' 31 3« 63 06 .11 25 .C*;,I. |.IS*-«ll|i.!-'F mK 27 ,.y?...i»!y.'.._l!!i..T.tJ^.'.'Au.M...n.?JLCE.. ~T'tS .00 R.'ILEB '.'.'.C^ TPE/l-'fNT I 22b I « ft .00 i>Of?IC /.CIO '0* POIIOv 2?0 ..5.L .9.7. 34 1 .•5 ...1.?. .00 bono i .00 pnp.pt1 "Yoy"~;oiE ]. o > aopp ; T'• i cHLO? |OE .oil"""oa'^KE"F'tO'lii" " ."0 PH.-..7E. Hl-1 17 I .03 ,'M. .•5 16 0 ,0f» ,.« ?.. .'Jiff.I :-.c. E.» V L f *iE • . r.°.°. P.?»..?/.?.v.! ll.fr. ^oi» r.fi'H'*4 OXIuE ".M(»""cV|Ej:irC;."Li"'"'f ' on .. '7. '.02 27 JO 32 a" I.?. IS* 17. 92 .27 2 .00 l*5fG |5 ,OJ 9 >o ,2ft ll ,6»» .03 10 ^»p CHROf|C ACJO, t'*?TL('tl ?*s-f I'M) CHROMIC *ciqf .«•«"cMr."n"iu>«"ox"io ,00 CLE»"EK, «CIU1C J«'337 13 J0234 .02 .1.0 CLEf ERt "El»l " 710 IbS "3* .Oft *[66 '""cob"ti"f""ox'f bŁ .00 CU'.'T.-CT CE"ENT .07 .03 27 IH image: ------- riT't. ~ T:ir.L ' ""~ f.r"'LF '* rc.'''LE Table 5.1-1 (4): NOES " ..... ' " "" ......... ' "" ' ............................... it> M33S , »5 ."5 .0 i .«»' CO 'T.'.CT CO -f i'i'JOUS'^OTSE COPPEP MTi-'.TE I. 9? I iiS FL-JID 01 00 13 7 ( r r r ' >. f . ,i 9 **. J« . -6 ,07 1 . - «?(• .?! .0| . >7 27 "« fE>El.OfŁr< 'I727P '.uC .no *>«?M is .07 27 .wb cis»ERSFrr 2 .9? ,«? •'•!:" 1 1? ............... *"" 12 . /a 8?2|7 Qvf, .(») fl6§! .0| 5 .0? .1? ^vT f?'1?.!^ ..... .'•<» ............ is """ ..... .V»6 ""t»c"Hivic S .01 ? ,00 E!i»V.Ff ...... .......... " 7«OIU ft 135ft IS* .27 137 .no ETH/'.OL. 2-nUfQEVi"'iG"SOE .(»•» FLUX, fiELDlNC FCA 9P660 266 js ' 9 SC 9*» .SI .01 .r>2 .09 .IR 27 it " J03IS 76622 "lib" .00 GLASS CLAlJER 27 .UO GLVCCPOL image: ------- ID Cyo.l IDE GOLD" POT VssnH" G->E*SE 2 3 "12 i-HECL II 31 .00 1'ii6" ME A f fRAj.SFEM d» 00 25 .J.32*. A..A.3. 3.90 7 16 TiVi" HYi ROGE'i 3 a 3«560 SO ,«»S 3 223 .4C 164 jo snj jo J«|59 <1C .07 |0 .»«' •°? "«.o" PK .O'l 2 .DC . ."'O II'K. jlO">9 J7 .'17 26 ,wO If«K, i6 .03" 2" .no "r-k". 41 %!»7. 21 ^"0 J 1M63 3« .07 27" ."•nV"|"Po«i iixYf"E"(FE203) 237? C,23 1657 >Q ]SHPROP»L .'.LCOllOL 11769 51 .10 5 .r.« n .??555 1.5.* ^2«»_ ?.« ,y.O ;L.;CCJER J3J98 j»S .12 II ^««» L-.Yr;t»T 9«i"62 3 ,'i'l "3" ."66""TEA*"" 3H .07 27 '.('0 LECITHINS PoajR |oa3 I 8b 7|9 .<»> LO'lG "AVC RAPID FMEODEflCY „_. 8I.6«0 a I.OS. 2? i,?A..L?J.|P^. 9J»57o 148 .26 60 60 .1 1 .? Al?-n---t^-C-^-!-'4?..t°P-M'^T- "m> " .---------.-.-.-_.-.-.-_-.-.. 39 rU7 27 .op »/G-'»ESIUM nT*'-*TF. 38 1 .07 27 ."0 .00 >*> 'VSTK GU-' ".i>2 9 ".i.o""v'Erici'iE",":J"Ec" ""bl l" C"ob""MERcUBY"cHLOR"l6E"VHGcL'2)" T»f'T'|''T ..17. 1 image: ------- Table 5.1-1 (6): NOES v Ft ''I i .•.•nKKf>5 |iAZA~R~D~~tfE~sC'MPn(l'' tr,n tnii MET.iPrt?S[li|L_ilIC ACID, "I X-.SuDjH -i S/.LT "[«| «" " "" .«••>" ftETH;f'C."'ilCMLbR6oiFL''l'p^ .^JL 112 . 1HIFLUORO .10 44 a* ji ,1-1 -'OLD RELEASE 8*337 3«» >7""~ "31 /pV"MOLn~I'~it"c~rr"'*' 504(iii Ii7 ,19 92 -i.A MŁ>LL r.iLt'PIOE 5*510 63 1 .It 4=) 1 00 I , MAZAI.O 6«055 I. «"• C ;• c .. 1(3142 | HOUll •> ,'M ,oC '.YLn'« (»-U"S-f~ONLY) * >. 5?138 ?? .la' 10 ' ...0 UIL. CUTTI:--C " "9?5co 56 .V6 'i Yoo""^ *"••"' 5?I3? 67 .12 21 ,0«> OIL, LUf-E •tICKEL SL'LFATE 27 HO MlUSb 34 .07 BI77« 2 .A? K3I42 |7 I"i 604 ..jO I.'ITHC ACID 27 ...2. "o'«5" "it* 1C »CfO, MAVG"»»it5t(?*) 00 (CBYJGENIc S 2? • •'0 OIL. .no OIL. Ol'tl CHI.'.G Jfil'j.5 .13 .P.?. 27 .«J OIL. ACID i vO jirtb9 JI064 1 5 '4 .••a 12 .6-1 .02 13 5 .i.l- .00 --.i»i« >0""* P; \'i 1,"" E'PiiXV" .f'O I 10 .21' 99 .fO P'.TT, i-EC 2. ,?(. ^l-1* fAWtFFI'i »-«XES AND P?OCO 7 ."""i I ."iiV"p«ssj"vE"JpPSTUREar*"" 4?49o I*>U .35 B30 .00 PRy LEAn-^F UNKNOWN '"s'Uis""" I4«>"" .27 l"5T VoO""PDf"p"ALL,VorjM^MF"" u. . 30175 "jozob" JL11. 310 00 -. 2- tt «_ .01 "02 2 ..„. 49 .00 • *P *.6b JE'LLY 00 57740 1L Ub ~~Ti 700 CHosPrtr.ic ACID, sooii"' S/.LT 578 .00 PH03PH?»IC ACID BI65? |57<40 1-1 9 .06 .?2. 1.74 I.S i II 6 4 38 .. 00 PHOSPHORUS ORO'UOE image: ------- 9J675 MI. .*<: . 75 .13 _5«»'i I. Oft ...0 ,00 lit 06 VI i. OPE » FIXE* no P 10 9*72' 167 01 I '«•> PL/.SMC* "Q ,iin" PL*TIKG "SOLUTION" .2 ,"!rt...r<~>LIS_H. "7 .00 POLY X 3 .ui< PQLY'JSETHtHE REST' f»:OnS. I-0«-:L*) 31 .07 27 .no • HAS26 2 OF 2 ' uO POLYVI'.VL P^SI'iS •» - . . - ... ..... ........ .*__.._..• ^.........._..&...._...-_-_ ^- ..... - _ ........ -r ...__Ł ..... ... 6*400 ol It JH CU'IlDE 15 61490 .13 10.'I OF '.00 PPTASSlUM PE9'0 PROPJfTS OF CD"P'JST fOM.ALCOHOLS ?>*** SH'JRI CHiI» HVpUCC" .01- .10 61 .11 rj« .0° I'J %PJ J 3 .1-0 >-»i25 "13 a .77 213 ••"•;"n'o" '.i ^'5i»? I^S ^33. 10 ,"iO PYttnpLfnl'.'O'iEj 2-, 3 ICS .01 76 .04 ,00 , 3 10 h "415 42 FLUX 310 19 13 , CPOXY ,f.o PESI.'. ''EC ".••6" >0 RUSI .f 1 07)10 10 .02 P0652 « .01 fcV^S J3 .0? 8)770 941 1.60 JJLi. SB, J"'l"NDWf4 37 liO SEALANT 5 frb""sEGM'E"NT*L" VfftR"A"fiO'"i • ,9? SELENIUM "aV6 .00"" SILANE 72 .00 SILA'IE, C"LORO- TT2 loo JIL»'«E; ••• >? SILICA Vn'o "siLicON >Op__S|LICprj C.ARBIpE '""""•••••• -r - ~ ~ ~ ~ ™ " ~ ^, •*»rt*i*~ •~ftJ l" rt O V l\ I t»C"» 1.09 76 2 ..oo .16 .75 sii'icd' ?oa on (SlrL3) image: ------- X TCiT;JL. CODE ijO 07 2** h " >i V ISU .2> V? Table 5.U1 (8): NOES :-"-'--"- .Yiz'.Vp'o'b'Es'cViP'fVoN" v 3IL!Cp"..J SlLfcO.ES anis 6) .11 J'4 JM7I J <• 1 1 1 .••** J»H7 ."1 J-C. II IA7 :t~ . SOt JlnS? .J.!.'V?S.. .oil 1 "n -l OflLV) f»M2 ^1^2. It 7 ..i 2? ''tit STi.O JTIM-- TIU'.ATE •• ----•-------^•------- • - • ± - - - »• --» - —_r - -»*•--•"- 50 .t'S ....A?. 2."I 22 .?!!. nil sf'LfUa" 1577 VI 0.1 "A'cT5' 5CIO S;LI Jf ? I .00 ,»'J TAPE, COHESIVE ^^2 •*• 2. . .i1! 2 . ^i»'l Ti-.VTApIC fClPj /I 197 *| j .02 7 ~C-it"l~FLL\,i*'lU''~ es VŁ> O> 3 5? .mox 17.' -Ift8- 125 T » , T 1 1 •; i 1 . 1 L'^'.'-if P064H 1-7 .07 10 27 65 00 "CUtcOL TTT P0430 55 1.05 . .". ..o 00 tt ,i*i 13 .00 VM 0»E3 .75 205 ^?.'^...'.'«..!.l!'JCSTctj---T.U>I.KNO*N_ M029 .PI 1 ii .00 ,- image: ------- Table 5.1-2 Potential Occupational Exposures and Exposure Situations in the Semiconductor Industry, as Identified by the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Semiconductor Industry Study, 1981). POTENTIAL EMPLOYEE EXPOSURES The potential for acute exposures to a variety of toxic/corrosive/flamnable chemicals and physical hazards are inherent in Semiconductor Industry processing. Job Categories - Plant and line maintenance workers, material handlers "(chem techs), gas system personnel, wafer fabrication line workers (a function of processing station/chemicals and adjacent areas), and glassware/equipment cleaning technicians. Types of Hazards: Chemical and gas exposures Non-ionizing radiation - RF, UV, IR, laser and cryogenic Ionizing radiation - alpha, beta, gamma and x-ray Physical hazards - shock and electrocution, back injury Psychological - controlled environment, temperature, humidity, lighting Repetitive tasks - fatigue, eyestrain (VDTs and biscopes), stress Variables affecting hazards: Workforce - age, sex, cultural composition, language Intangibles - (fabrication employees) - generally, lack of technical understanding of the task being performed and its relevancy/ importance to the finished product. POTENTIAL EXPOSURE SITUATIONS Materials Handling - Spillage, breakage, leakage, chemical mixing. 6as Systems - Leak diagnosis and testing; cylinder changes, handling and purging; safety systems failure; dispensing system changes. Emergency Response - Inadequate training/lack of adequate safety, protective and test equipment. Ventilation and Exhaust Scrubbing System - Failure of all or portions of the system without providing fail-safe controls and back-up power. Vjaste System - Handling, segregation of non-compatibles, carcinogens. -99- image: ------- Material Abietic acid Acetic acid Acetone Acetylene Aluminum Aluminum acetate Aluminum oxide Ammonia Ammonium bifluoride Ammonium chloride Ammonium fluoride Ammonium hydroxide Ammonium persulfate Aniline Antimony Antimony trioxide Argon Arsenic Arsenic trichloride Arsenic trioxide Arsine Asbestos Beryllium Beryllium oxide Boric acid Boron Boron carbide Boron nitride Boron tribromide Boron trichloride Boron trifluoride n-Butyl acetate Cadmium Calcium hydroxide Calcium hypochloride Process operation and/or application Solder flux component Metal and semiconductor etch component Wafer cleaner, solvent Welding gas Metallization Etch component Packaging material: abrasive—wafer polish Carrier gas—epitaxial deposition; plasma etch component Oxide etch component Etch component Oxide etch component Wafer cleaner, etch component Wafer cleaner, etch component Solvent Dopant (P-type)—diffusion, ion implantation, crystal growth Dopant (P-type) source—diffusion, crystal growth Carrier gas—ion implantation Dopant (N-typel—diffusion, ion implantation, crystal growth Dopant (N-type) source—epitaxial deposition Dopant (N-type) source—diffusion Dopant (N-type) source—diffusion, epitaxial deposition, ion implantation Insulator, packaging material Metallization Insulator, packaging material Dopant (P-type) source—diffusion, epitaxial deposition, ion implantation, crystal growth Dopant (P-type)—diffusion, epitaxial deposi- tion, ion implantation, crystal growth Abrasive—wafer dicing, lapping, and polishing Dopant (P-type) source—diffusion, epitaxial deposition, ion implantation Dopant (P-type) source—diffusion, epitaxial deposition, ion implantation Dopant (P-type) source—diffusion, epitaxial deposition, ion implantation Dopant (P-type) source—diffusion, epitaxial deposition, ion implantation Photoresist developer Dopant (P-type)—epitaxial deposition, ion implantation; solder component Wastewater treatment Etch component, oxidizer Table 5.1-3 A list of common materials used or generated in the manufacture of semiconductors. Source: Hazard Assessment of the Electronic Component Manufacturing Industry (NIOSH, 1985) -100- image: ------- Material Carbon dioxide Carbon monoxide Carbon tetrafluoride Ceric ammonium nitrate Chlorobenzene Chloroform Chloromethane Chlorosilane Chromic acid Chromic oxide Chromium Chromium trioxide Citric acid Cobalt Colophony (generic) Copper Copper nitrate 712D (trade name) Deionized water Detergent (generic) Diamond Diborane Dichlorosilane Diethyl telluride Dimethyl formamide Electroplating solutions (generic) Epichlorohydrin Epoxy resins and strippers Ethanol Ethanol amine 2-Ethoxy ethanol Ethyl acetate Ethylene glycol FC-85 (trade name) Ferric chloride Fluoride Fluoroboric acid Fluorocarbons (chlorofluoro- carbons) Formaldehyde Gallium Process operation and/or application Testing gas. coolant Reducing gas—metallization, epitaxial deposition Nitride etch component Etch component, oxidizer Solvent, degreaser Solvent, degreaser Solvent, degreaser Epitaxial deposition, passivation, ion implantation, crystal growth Etch component, cleaning solution. photoresist stripper solution component Abrasive—wafer polishing Metallization, plating operation Crystal growth Etch component Conductor metal, packaging material Solder flux Conductor metal, metallization, packaging material Etch component, oxidizer Negative photoresist stripper Wafer cleaner, rinse, oxidization Wafer cleaner Abrasive—wafer dicing, lapping, and polishing Dopant (P-type) source—diffusion, epitaxial deposition, ion implantation Epitaxial deposition, passivation, ion implan- tation, crystal growth Dopant (N-type) source—epitaxial deposition Solvent Copper, gold, nickel, and silver plating Epoxy resin component Packaging material, crystal slicing Wafer cleaner Photoresist stripper component Wafer cleaner, degreaser, solvent, photoresist component Solvent, degreaser Photoresist remover Wetting solution, photolithography Etch component, oxidizer Solder flux component Dopant (P-type) source—epitaxial deposition. crystal growth Wafer cleaner, degreaser. solvent, cleaner. dewaxing Solder by-product gas Dopant (P-type)—epitaxial deposition, ion implantation, crystal growth; solder component Table 5.1-3 (2) . A list of common materials used or generated in the manufacture of semiconductors, (continued) -101- image: ------- Material Gallium arsenic phosphide Gallium arsenide Gallium chloride Gallium oxide Gallium phosphide Garnet Germane Germanium Glycerine Gold Graphite Helium Hexamethyl disilizane (HMDS) Hexane Hydrobromic acid Hydrochloric acid Hydrofluoric acid Hydrogen Hydrogen chloride Hydrogen peroxide Tndium Indium antimonide Iodine Isodecane J-100 (trade name) Krypton 85 ' Lacquer (paint and thinner) Lead Liquid nitrogen Magnesium Manganese Mercury Methanol 2-Methoxyethyl acetate Methylene chloride Methyl ethyl ketone Methyl isobutyl ketone Mixed acid etch* Molybdenum Nickel Process operation and/or application Semiconductor material Semiconductor material Dopant (P-type) source—epitaxial deposition Dopant (P-type) source—diffusion, crystal growth Semiconductor material Abrasive—wafer dicing, lapping, and polishing Epitaxial deposition, crystal growth Semiconductor material, metallization, solder component Etch component Conductor metal, lead attachment, metalliza- tion, solder component High-temperature material—epitaxial deposi- tion, metallization, crystal growth Process and carrier gas, leak detector Patterning, wafer surfactant Solvent Etch component Etch component Oxide and semiconductor etch component Carrier gas—epitaxial deposition, annealing, ion implantation Gas phase etch, epitaxial deposition Etch component, wafer cleaner, oxidizer Dopant (P-type)—metallization: solder component Semiconductor material Etch component, oxidizer Photoresist component Negative photoresist stripper Leak testing Coating Solder component Coolant Packaging material, lead, material Packaging material, lead material Epitaxial deposition Wafer cleaner, solvent Solvent, degreaser Solvent Solvent Solvent Etch component Packaging material, metallization Packaging material, metallization, lead material •Combination of various acids, e.g.. hydrofluoric and nitric: hydrofluoric, nitric, and acetic: nitric and hydrochloric: and nitric and sulfunc. Table 5.1-3 (3) A list of common materials used or generated in the manufacture of semiconductors, (continued) -102- image: ------- Material Nitric acid Nitric oxide Nitrogen Nitrogen dioxide Nitrous oxide Oxygen Ozone Palladium Paraffinic mineral oil Perchloric acid Phenol Phosphine Phosphoric acid Phosphorus Phosphorus oxychloride Phosphorus pentoxide Phosphoric tribromide Photoresists (positive and negative) Photoresist developers (positive and negative) Photoresist rinses Photoresist strippers Platinum Polyisoprene Potassium dichromate Potassium hydroxide Potassium iodide Propane Propanol (1,1; 1,2: iso-; n-) Rhodium Selenium Silane Silica (amorphous, crystalline) Silicon Silicon carbide Silicon dioxide Silicon nitride Silicone Silicone rubber Silver Process operation and/or application Metal and semiconductor etch component. photoresist stripper component By-product gas from etch tanks Carrier gas—diffusion, epitaxial deposition; bonding gas By-product gas from etch tanks By-product gas from etch tanks, epitaxial deposition, passivation Oxidization, passivation, bonding gas Oxidation, by-product gas from ultraviolet photoresist exposure step Metallization Pump lubrication Etch component J-100 component Dopant (P-type) source—diffusion, epitaxial deposition, ion implantation, passivation Aluminum and semiconductor etch Dopant (N-type) source—diffusion, epitaxial deposition, ion implantation Dopant (N-type) source—diffusion, epitaxial deposition, ion implantation Dopant (N-type! source—diffusion, epitaxial deposition, ion implantation Dopant (N-type) source—diffusion, epitaxial deposition, ion implantation Photolithography Photolithography Photolithography Photolithography Metallization Encapsulation material Etch, oxidizer Etch component Photolithography Fuel gas Wafer cleaner, etch additive Conduction metal, plating, packaging material Dopant (N-type)—epitaxia! deposition Epitaxial deposition, passivation, ion implan- tation, crystal growth Glass, ceramic packages Semiconductor material Abrasive—wafer dicing, lapping, and polishing Passivation coat and packaging material Passivation coat and packaging material Packaging material, pump lubrication Packaging material Conductor metal, metallization, solder component Table 5.1-3 (4) A list of common materials used or generated in the manufacture of semiconductors, (continued) -103- image: ------- Material . Sodium hydroxide . Solder and solder flux Stoddard solvent Sulfur hexafluoride Sulfuric acid Tellurium Tetrachloroethy lene Tetrachlorosilane Tetramethyl ammonium hydroxide Tin Titanium Toluene Toluene diisocyanate (TDI) Tributyl phosphate 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene Trichloroethane (1,1.1) Trichloroethylene Trichlorosilane Trifluoroethylene Trimethyl gallium Tungsten Vanadium Varnish Wax Xylene Zinc Zirconium Zirconium oxide Process operation and/or application Etch component, wastewater treatment Soldering Wafer cleaner, degreaser Gas phase etch component Etch component, wafer cleaner, photoresist stripper component Metallization Solvent Epitaxial deposition, passivation, ion implan- tation, crystal growth Etch component Solder component Metallization Photoresist component, wafer cleaner, solvent, varnish component Flux component Encapsulation material Solvent Solvent, degreaser Wafer cleaner, degreaser, dewaxing, J-100, component Epitaxial deposition, passivation, ion implan- tation, crystal growth Degreaser. wafer cleaner Dopant (P-type) source—epitaxial deposition Metallization Metallization Packaging material Wafer mounting Photoresist component, wafer cleaner, solvent Dopant (P-type)—diffusion, epitaxial deposi- tion: solder component Metallization Abrasive—wafer polishing Table 5.1-3 (5) A list of common materials used or generated in • the manufacture of semiconductors, (continued) -104- image: ------- 5.1.5 Actual Exposures For this report, six sources of actual exposure data for the semiconductor industry were reviewed. These sources included 1) Federal OSHA inspection data from 1979-82; 2) nine NIOSH Health Hazard Evaluations (HHE's), three of which involved Santa Clara County firms; 3) four NIOSH Control Technology surveys, one preliminary Control Technology survey (two of which involved Santa Clara County firms), and two unpublished NIOSH articles summarizing some of the monitoring data in the Control Technology Reports; 4) the CAL/OSHA study; 5) twenty CAL/OSHA inspection case-files, representing inspections at ten different semiconductor firms in Santa Clara County; and 6) industry data provided by the Occupational Health Committee of the Semiconductor Industry Association. These separate sources and their respective findings are reviewed below, with a general summary given at the end of the section. 5.1.5.1 OSHA Inspection Data. (1979-82) During the three years for which data were analyzed, federal OSHA conducted 40 inspections of semiconductor firms (SIC 3674), during which a total of 318 exposure samples were taken. These samples covered a total of 65 distinct substances. Findings of overexposure were on the whole negligible. Only 10 out of the 65 substances were sampled at higher than 20% of the OSHA PEL (permissible exposure limit) in any sample, and only six were ever sampled at or above the PEL. Of the 318 total samples taken during these inspections, only 14 exceeded the PEL. The substances most frequently sampled were inorganic lead, 32.5% of inspections; isopropyl alcohol, 17.5% of inspections; chloroform, 15% of inspections; lead arsenate, 12.5% of inspections; and perchloroethylene, xylene, arsenic and tin, monitored in 10% of inspections each. Substances for which at least one sample at 50% or more of the PEL was obtained were beryllium, copper fume, iron oxide fume, isopropyl alcohol, inorganic lead, and perchloroethylene; sampling results for these substances are shown in Table 5.1-4. These same six were the only substances in SIC 3674 sampled at or above the PEL. (As shown in Table 5.1-4 the maximum proportion of the PEL at which all six substances were sampled was greater than or equal to 1.00.) Based on these inspections and monitoring results, the semiconductor industry was ranked quite low. (i.e., non-hazardous) relative to other industries in terms of the number and extent of significant exposures found. Using the IBER (Inspection Based Exposure Ranking) system, SIC 3674 ranked 313 out of the 475 Industries ranked. 5.1.5.2 NIOSH Health Hazard Evaluations (HHE's) Since the inception of NIOSH in 1971, the agency has performed a number of HHE's for SIC 3674, of which eight were reviewed for this report. These included HHE's for FMC Corp., TRW Electronics, INMOS Corp., and Siemens Components (2 HHE's), all in Colorado, and Signetics Corp. (2 HHE's) and Advanced Micro Devices, both in Sunnyvale in Santa Clara County. An additional HHE for the University of Cincinnati (SIC 8221) involving semiconductor manufacturing processes, was also included in the review. Two of these HHE's, the one for Advanced Micro Devices, and one of the two Signetics HHE's, were interim reports only: The Advanced Micro Devices report is still in progress, while the Signetics HHE, begun in 1979, was never completed. -105- image: ------- Table 5.1-4 Federal OSHA Semiconductor Industry Inspections: Substances with Sanple Exposures at or above 501 of the OSHA PEL Substance Reryll iun Copper Fune Iron Oxide Fune Isopropyl Alcohol Inorganic Lead Perchloroethylene Nun of Insps 2 1 3 7 13 4 Nun of expos Samps 25 1 11 19 37 fl Mean Propor- tion of PF.L 0.39 i.no 0.34 0.14 0.23 0.34 Max Propor- tion of PEL 16.50 1.00 1.00 1.42 5.00 1.34 Nun Insps w/ sone Sanp>PF.L 1 0 0 1 1 1 Nun of Insps w/ Mean>PFL 0 0 0 0 1 1 Nun of Sanps > PFL 2 n 0 l 9 7. -106- image: ------- These HHE's were undertaken between 1977 and 1985, six at the request of employers, and three at the request of employee representatives. Five of the HHE's involved evaluation of both medical complaints and exposures; the remaining four involved only exposure evaluations. Environmental monitoring was performed in eight of the nine HHE's reviewed (the Advanced Micro Devices interim report containing no sampling data). NIOSH investigators gathered a total of 791 personal and area samples for 50 chemical substances. The substances sampled were predominantly solvents, but also included acids, metals, and particulates. Table 5.1-5 shows the chemicals identified, the number of HHE's in which there was a measurement, the number of samples taken, the range of measured levels, and the CAL/OSHA PEL'S (current) applicable to each substance. As can be seen from the table, only two substances were sampled at levels above the current CAL/OSHA PEL, 2-ethoxyethanol (ethylene glycol monoethyl ether, cellosolve), and trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11). One other substance, chloroform, was measured above the NIOSH criteria level but not above the higher CAL/OSHA standard. The high levels for trichlorofluoromethane and chloroform were both obtained at the same plant (FMC). All three of the chemicals with high levels were in use as solvents. The highest sampled exposure for 2-ethoxyethanol was nearly twice the PEL; the highest for trichlorofluoromethane was over six times the PEL; and the highest for chloroform (23 mg/m3) was over twice the NIOSH criteria level, but less than half the CAL/OSHA PEL (50 mg/m3). Work-related medical complaints discussed in the five HHE's which included them were generally eye, nose, and throat irritation, light-headedness, and respiratory distress, all common symptoms related to solvent and acid exposure. One HHE (AMD) also included complaints of burns, and hydrogen chloride and other gas inhalation resulting in irritation and CNS symptoms. Another HHE (Signetics) encountered complaints of narcosis as well as irritation. 5.1.5.3 NIOSH Control Technology Reports NIOSH Control Technology (CT) reports are performed to evaluate engineering and other controls. In 1982-83, NIOSH conducted 21 preliminary walk-through surveys and 4 in-depth surveys of semi-conductor firms to characterize basic exposures, processes and controls in the microelectronics industry, and to assess the suitability of controls used . For this report, we reviewed all 4 in-depth surveys, involving NEC Electronics in Mountain View, California, Fairchild Semiconductor in Maine, United Technologies Corporation Mostek Facility in Texas, and Xerox Corporation in El Segundo, California; we also reviewed the abstract of one of the walk-through surveys, performed at Comdial Semiconductor, Inc. in Sunnyvale. For the four in-depth surveys, NIOSH intentionally selected facilities with sophisticated control procedures and technologies, so as to be able to identify desirable control technology. The firms selected represented various levels of employment, from 220 (Xerox) to over 7,000 total employees (UT-Moskek). These surveys focused on 4 to 6 key processes and systems, though slightly different processes were evaluated among the different plants. Altogether, the process and systems evaluated included photolithography, wet chemical etching and wet chemical stations, ion-implantation, radio frequency operations in plasma etching, gas handling systems, gas distribution systems, diffusion doping and chemical vapor deposition. -107- image: ------- Table 5.1-5 Substances Honltored In Eight NIOSH HHE's For SIC 3674. 1977-85 Chemical fHHE's 1n which * of Sampled Samples Range PEL acetone aluminum oxide alkanes aluminum acetic add arsenic n-butyl acetate benzene cellosolve acetate chloroform carbon monoxide carbon dioxide copper Cristobal 1te 2-ethoxyethanol ethyl acetate formaldehyde fluorides hydrochloric add hydrofluoric add hydrogen peroxide hydrazlne Isopropanol lead methyl ethyl ketone methyl chloroform methyl Isobutyl ketone methanol methyl chloride methyl ene chloride nitric add nickel petroleum distillates phosphoric add phospMne quartz sulfuMc add total partlculates toluene toluene 2,4, d11socyanate tin trlchloroethylene 1,1,1 trlchloroethane tr1 ehl orof 1 uoroethane trlehlorofluoromethane xyl ene zinc 3 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 4 1 1 6 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 4 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 3 1 1 1 3 4 1 5 1 34 2 16 5 19 6 28 3 24 4 5 7 3 3 6 2 1 7 11 33 3 4 41 10 37 21 20 9 16 18 31 3 15 6 4 3 6 8 56 8 3 10 30 92 14 82 10 NOa-34 mg/m3 NO-0. 00002 mg/m3 NO- 1.7 mg/m3 NO-0. 04 mg/m3 NO NO ND-23.3 mg/m3 NO <0.01-75 mg/n3 <0. 01-23 mg/m3 NO -6 ppm NT) all <0.007 mg/mj all <0.3 mg/m3 <0. 01-353 mgym3 8-13 mg/m3 NO NO <0.004-4.41 mg/m3 NO-0. 5 mg/m-3 0.04-0.33 mg/m3 <0.02 NO-45.8 mg/m3. all <0.005 mg/3 <0.01-2.8 mg/m3 <0. 01-21 mg/m3 <0. 01-24 mg/m3 0.7-150 mg/m3 0.3-5.3 mg/m3 ND-2 mg/m3 NO-2.5 mg/m3 all <0.008 mg/m3 <0.1-35 mg/m3 NO NO all <0.03 mg/m;; 0.02-0.23 mg/m3 0.01-0.45 mg/m3 NO-fiO mg/m3 all <0.04 mg/sampje all <0.035 mg/m3 2-57 mg/m3, ND-124 mg/m3 0.34-1294 mg/m3 8-35,000 mg/m3 ND-19.2 mg/m3 <0. 002-0. 04 mg/m3 1780 mg/m3 10 mg/m3 No PEL 10 mg/m3 25 mg/m3 0.01 mg/m3 710 mg/n3 30 mg/m3 270 mg/m3 50 mg/m3 50 ppm 5000 ppm 0.2 mg/m3 b 185 mg/rr 1400 mg/m3 3 mg/m3 2.5 mg/m3 7 mg/m3 ?. mg/m3 1.5 mg/m3 0.1 mg/m3 980 mg/m3 0.05 mg/m3 590 mg/m3 1900 mg/m3 205 mg/m3 260 mg/m3 105 mg/m3 360 mg/m3 30 mg/m3 1 mg/m3 525 mg/m3 1 mg/m3 0.4 mg/m3 b 1 mg/m3 10 mg/m3 375 mg/m3 0.14 mg/m3 ? mg/m3 135 mg/m3 1900 mg/m3 7600 mg/m3 SfiOO mg/q3 435 mgZnr 5 mg/m3 - not detectable b - PEL must be calculated from percent of substance 1n total dust. -108- image: ------- In the course of the surveys, several hundred samples were taken for various chemical and physical hazards, including arsine, phosphine and diborane gases, hydrofluoric and sulfuric acids, phosphorous oxychloride, cellosolve, methyl cellosolve, xylene, acetone, MEK, antimony, X-ray radiation, radio frequency, and UV light. Most monitored levels were considerably below established PEL'S. Key exceptions were arsenic present in ion-implantation, and radio frequency emissions from plasma etching or cleaning operations. Area samples in the ion-implanter detected very high levels of arsenic, up to 14,361 g/m^ in one instance. However, personal samples for operators and maintenance personnel were well below the PEL of 10 g/m^. 5.1.5.4 CAL/OSHA Semiconductor Industry Study (1981) Responding to concerns about potential health hazards in the electronics industry, CAL/OSHA initiated a survey research project in 1980 that eventually included 13 manufacturers of semiconductors in the Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties (Silicon Valley). The final report, the Semiconductor Industry Study. 1981, covered process descriptions, relevant hazards, monitoring results, toxicological analysis, and conclusions and recommendations. Industrial hygiene monitoring in this study covered the following substances: Acetic acid Acetone Aliphatic amines Aminoethanol compounds Ammonia Antimony Arsenic Arsine Benzene 2-Butanone (MEK) Butyl acetate Butyl alcohol Chlorinated benzene Chromic acid & Chromates Gallium Hydrochloric acid Hydrofluoric acid Isopropyl alcohol Lead Methyl alcohol Methylene chloride Morpholine Nitric acid Nuisance dust Phenol Phosphoric acid Phosphorus Potassium hydroxide Silica (crystalline) -109- image: ------- Sodium hydroxide Sulfuric acid Tetrachloroethylene Toluene Turpentine 1,1,2-trichloro 1,1,2-trifluoroethane (Freon 113) Trichloroethylene Xylene Generally, monitoring results taken during normal processing routines were very low. Few accurate monitoring samples could be taken during maintenance/system malfunction operations due to the transient and sporadic nature of this type of potential exposure. In routine operations, overexposures were found for methanol and inorganic arsenic m silicon ingot and wafer processing. Overexposures during maintenance operations were found when sampling methylene chloride in silicon ingot and wafer processing, and inorganic arsenic in silicon device manufacturing and LED (Light Emitting Diode) device processing. Exposure dose levels for these substances are shown in Table 5.1-6. 5.1.5.5 CAL/OSHA Inspection Data We reviewed 10 firms in Santa Clara County with a total of 20 inspections in CAL/OSHA inspection files, and found no exposures over the current CAL/OSHA PEL. Only one substance, ethyl acetate, was monitored at or above 50% of the PEL. Monitoring was done for six substances: these included arsenic, xylene, ethyl acetate, trichloroethylene, 1,1,1 trichloroethane, and arsine. The range of concentrations found for each substance is shown in Table 5.1-7. In addition, a number of chemical substances were investigated, but no monitoring was done. These substances included: 4-dimethylaminoazobenzene benzidine hydrochloride hydrochloric acid phosphine acetone alcohol phosphoric acid freon etching cleaner/aqua regia benzaldehyde arsenic/arsine Inspection files were reviewed for Ion Implant Services, Hewlett-Packard, Fairchild Camera and Instrument Corporation, Teledyne MEC, Litronix, Toshiba Semiconductor, General Instrument Corporation, Advanced Micro Devices, Signetics Corporation, and Apple Computer. -110- image: ------- Table 5.1-6 CAL/OSHA Semiconductor Industry Study, 1981: Substances with Monitored Overexposures Chemical Dose (Exposure level/PFL) methanol 1.4R 1.27 1.55 nethylene chloride 1.31 arsenic 1.0 fi.4 5.2 1.0 1.5 -111- image: ------- Table 5.1-7 CAL/OSHA Monitoring Data from Inspections of Ten Santa Clara County Finns, 1979-84 Data Represent 20 Inspections Chenical Air Concentrations (range) Current CAL/OSHA PFL arsenic 0.0064 - 0.009 mg/n3 0.01 ng/n3 xylene 0.5 - 5 ppm 100 ppn ethyl acetate 200 ppn 400 ppn trichloroethylene <10 ppn ?5 ppn 1,1,1 trichloroethane 25 ppn 350 ppn arsine <0.001 ng/n3 0.2 ng/n3 -112- image: ------- 5.1.5.6 Industry Data '""i 1 in, The Occupational Health Committee of the Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA) collects sampling data from member firms. We obtained detailed SIA data for sampled measurements of xylene and glycol ethers, as well as individual monitoring results from Signetics for various acids, solvents, dusts, and lead, but no dopant gases such as arsine or phosphine. Industry sampling data for xylene, involving hundreds of personal breathing zone samples, were all substantially below the CAL/OSHA PEL of 100 ppm, although routine monitoring in non-wafer fabrication areas disclosed at least one sample at 47ppm. Industry data for glycol ethers, (2-butoxyethanol, 2-methoxyethanol, 2-ethoxyethanol, 2-methoxyethyl acetate, and 2-ethoxyethyl acetate) encompassed 371 personal and area samples (279 by SI A companies and 92 by NIOSH from the 1983 Control Technology surveys), of which 69.3% were for 2-ethoxyethyl acetate, 16.7% for 2-ethoxyethanol, 10.2%-for:2-methoxyethyl acetate, 3.2% for 2-methoxyethanol and 0.5% for 2-butoxyethanol. Sampling-" rcults showed only 74 (20%) of samples to be of detectable concentrations; and of these,'onty 4 (5.4%), all involving 2-ethoxyethyl acetate, were above 1 ppm. The samples above 1 ppm were for peak concentrations, taken at periods of maximum potential exposures the SIA study therefore assumed that on an 8-hour TWA basis, none of the fourosarnpled workers would have received even 1 ppm exposure. The highest exposure measured was for "operator" (work area not stated), at 18 ppm (peak exposure). This is well ^below the CAL/OSHA PEL of 50 TWA ppm, but above the DOW Chemical Company recommendation of 5 ppm. ti ' • > The Signetics data included over 100 personalized area samples taken in 1985 for various substances, predominantly sulfuric, phosphoric, nitric and -hydrochloric acids, acetone, xylene, n-butyl acetate, lead, dust, ethylbenzene, Freon 113, and 1,1,1-trichloroethane. None of these samples were above the CAL/OSHA PEL. Some samples were at or above 50% of the PEL, including lead (samples'included levels of 50%. 22% and 30% of the PEL), and xylene (samples included levels of *7% and 67% of the PEL). urs _ 5.1.6 Summary of Exposure Data 5 re ii. The overall picture of hazardous exposures in the industry as shown by the data reviewed is that relative to established PELs, workers typically receive very low or minimal exposures. This characterization has held true, generally, fof personal and area sampling, and for total (TWA) and peak exposures. Notable instan&s^in which exposures have been found at or near the PEL has included some solvents, including one NIOSH-sampled overexposure for 2-ethoxyethanol, arsenic in ion-implantation areas (NIOSH 2lŁa samples only), arsenic in diffusion-tube maintenance, EPI vacuum cleaner maintenance. and LED device processing (CAL/OSHA 1981 study), lead (OSHA and industry data), and beryllium (OSHA data). However, despite the apparent absence of palpable exposure risks disclosed by monitoring, the presence of highly hazardous materials, such as arsettic, in important semiconductor fabrication processes must be considered. In light ofWese hazards, the authors of the 1981 CAL/OSHA study, reviewing their own monitoring results, and Ungers and Jones, reviewing data for ion-implantation systems from the in-edepth NIOSH Control Technology reports (2) both voiced concern that risks of exposure remained. With regard to silicon-device manufacturing (discrete or 1C circuits on silicon wafers), the 1981 CAL/OSHA study noted that "the potential for sporadic short duration (acute) exposures to the range of hazardous agents and by-products during maintenance or system malfunction -113- image: ------- is an area which warrants in-depth evaluation (p. 264) (3). Ungers and Jones, noting first that in the NIOSH CT surveys, "at no time . . . were workplace concentrations of arsenic found to exceed a maximum value of 3.6 ug/m3," stated that (in ion-implantation systems areas) "area samples collected at key maintenance points on the implants were high enough to indicate a potential for more serious exposures" (p. 16) (2). 5.1.7 Occupational Illness Statistics for the Semiconductor Industry in Santa Clara County To examine illness data for the semiconductor industry in Santa Clara County, we examined sources: 1) Summary Statistics from "Employer's Reports of Occupational Injury and Illness," kept by the Division of Labor Statistics and Research (DLSR) and obtained for years 1982-84 for Santa Clara County; 2) Summary Statistics from "Doctor's First Reports of Occupational Injury and Illness," also kept by DLSR, obtained for years 1979 and 1982-84 for Santa Clara County; and 3) data prepared by or for the Occupational Health Committee of the Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA), including summaries of the "Employer's Report" database (from the State of California for years 1977-83, and from industry-compiled data for 1983). For discussion of how DLSR tabulates its statistics, see the DLSR section in Section 2 of this report. A third DLSR database, compiled from employers logs of occupational injury and illness, was not reviewed because the data are not available by county. Generally, the types of sources reviewed, based on reported illness for which an occupational etiology has been recognized, tend to capture acute, well-defined problems, such as burns, gas inhalations, and skin irritations. While important occupational illnesses, such as cancer or any chronic or latent problem, are poorly captured by such systems, these systems may complement environmental monitoring results, which themselves are poorly suited to capturing episodic exposures such as chemical burns, or irregular chemical exposures of brief duration. Employer's Report Statistics from DLSR showed that, in 1983, the Santa Clara County Semiconductor industry reported 182 occupationally related illnesses involving at least one lost workday; in 1984 this figure was 176 (the 1982 data obtained did not have 4-digit SIC). These figures represent 12% and 11% of the total non-government Employer's Reports of occupational illness for the county in 1983 and 1984, respectively. This proportion is somewhat greater than the proportion of SIC 3674 employment to total Santa Clara County employment as of Fall 1983, which was about 8%. These figures reflect only illnesses which resulted in at least one lost work day. Breakdowns of Santa Clara County occupational disease cases by specific type and cause were obtained from DLSR's Doctor's First Reports database for 1982-84. Unfortunately, the data available from this database are by three-digit SIC only. Bearing in mind the inclusion of other electronics industries in the 367 SIC (Electronic Components), these data show that dominant illnesses were chemical burns (about 25%), eye conditions (about 23%), skin conditions (about 23%), and systemic poisonings (about 16%). Electronic components (SIC 367) taken as a whole was a major contributor of Doctor's First Reports in the county. For example, in 1984, SIC 367 contributed nearly one-half of the Doctor's First Reports for chemical burns, and about 30% of the reports for "systemic poisoning". However, these figures are not limited to the semiconductor industry alone. Illnesses identified by the Occupational Health System of the SIA contained slightly different categorizations and proportions, showing (for 1983—179 cases total), dermatitis (34.6%), repiratory effects (17.3%), conjunctivitis (14.5%), and "systemic effect" (10.1%); a category of "other illness" comprised 17.9% of the cases. Chemical burns, which were not -114- image: ------- classified as illnesses by SIA, were the fourth most frequent type of injury or illness, accounting for 11.4% of all work-related injuries or illnesses (1,640 total cases). The major causes of illness tended to arise from acids and miscellaneous unspecified chemical compounds. DLSR Doctor's First Reports data for SIC 367 for 1984, for example, showed 200 out of 557 total illness cases to be related to acids, of which 57 were from hydrofluoric acid. Though very few cases were related to certain substances of concern in exposure monitoring (such as arsenic), the number of arsenic cases reported (7) are noteworthy in light of arsenic's carcinogenic effect. (It should be noted again that these figures are not specific to SIC 3674, however). 5.1.8 Literature There is an emerging literature on occupational health issues in the semiconductor industry. The first detailed assessment of semiconductor-related processes was performed by NIOSH, involving analysis of the photovoltaic solar cell industry (4). Descriptions of processes and industrial hygiene monitoring and control considerations can be found in the 1984 edition of Industrial Hygiene Aspects of Plant Operations. Cralley and Cralley, eds., volume II, Chapter 35, "LSI Semiconductor Manufacturing" (5). Volume III of the same series (1985) contains a discussion of engineering considerations in equipment, layout, and building design, including the issue of highly flammable or explosive materials in use in the industry (6). In addition to the CAL/OSHA (3) and NIOSH (7) studies already cited, a detailed review of potential hazards, health effects and opportunities for exposure in the industry can be found in The Microelectronics Industry. Joseph LaDou, ed. (8). This study contains no monitoring data, nor original health effects research, however, though other research and anecdotal cases are cited. The potential for arsenic exposure from doped semiconductor wafers has been investigated by Ungers, Jones, Mclntyre, and McHenry, with a finding that arsenic is emitted from doped wafers up to 4 hours after ion-implantation (9). Ungers and Jones have reviewed data from the NIOSH in-depth Control Technology surveys for ion-implantation areas (3); and' Ungers, Jones, and Mihlan have reviewed similar data for radio frequency exposure in plasma etching, stripping, or cleaning of wafers (10). Very few epidemiological studies of semiconductor industry health effects were found. One such study, cited in The Microelectronics Industry, by Sorahan, Waterhouse, McKiernan, et.al., demonstrated a higher than expected incidence of melanoma among semiconductor workers in England (11). 5.1.9 Other Observations Despite the absence, in the thousands of personal and area sampling measurements reviewed, of either pattern or prevalence in actual overexposures to semiconductor workers. the hazards and processes used in the industry will continue to require assessment, for the following reasons. First there are problems which are poorly assessed by monitoring or illness reporting systems. Among these are the unknown long-term low-level exposures to solvents, a particular risk for semiconductor workers due to the prevalence of solvent use, as well as the extensive use of recirculated air in fabrication clean rooms. -115- image: ------- Second, the problem of potential catastrophic accident, caused by fire or explosion due to explosive, combustible gases such as hydrogen or silane, which are also extensively used, must be addressed by appropriate gas storage and handling systems, with automated leak detection equipment. Third, in the course of researching this report, we reviewed many anecdotal accounts of worker anxiety and non-specific, systemic health complaints, for which no cause could be attributed. These complaints were seen in CAL/OSHA case files, in the CAL/OSHA study, in some of the NIOSH HHE's, in newspaper articles with worker interviews, and in conversations with community members and occupational health professionals. Such complaints may not be inconsistent with gas or solvent exposures, or health effects of exposures to other toxic materials. Another possible contributing factor was also suggested by Dr. Peter Wald, a physician at the UC San Francisco Occupational Health Clinic, who noted that fabrication workers generally work in sterile "clean room" environments, often wearing protective clothing while performing repetitive and tedious tasks (e.g., looking through microscopes, transferring wafers). Even if no hazardous level of exposure is present, such an environment may be highly stressful and aggravate other health complaints. Or. Wald suggested an approach to the microelectronics industry involving attention to ergonomic issues, and including epidemiologic studies of worker populations. Finally, the highly innovative and technical character of the industry dictates that new processes and materials will continue to make their appearance among semiconductor firms, thereby introducing worker exposures and hazards of unknown significance. 5.1.10 5.1.10 Summary The semiconductor industry presents a paradoxical work environment. It is an industry which on the one hand represents, in the materials and processes it uses, and in its dynamic innovations, a great potential source of hazardous exposures and diseases, both known and unknown. At the same time, none of the agencies which have yet reviewed the industry for actual exposures using conventional industrial hygiene techniques have found evidence of substantial exposures. The recommeadations for fastidious and diligent attention to exposure sampling, control technology and worker training by firms, as already outlined by the existing literature, would seem to remain standard recommendations, as would continued research by appropriate governmental agencies, such as NIOSH. -116- image: ------- REFERENCES 1. Chazkin, W., Double Exposure: Women's Health Hazards on the Job and at Home. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1984. 2. Ungers, L.J., and Jones, J.H., "Industrial Hygiene and Control Technology Assessment of Ion Implantation". Submitted for publication. 3. Wade, R., Williams, M., Mitchell, T., Wong, J., and Tuse, B., Semiconductor Industry Study. Technical Document of California Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Occupational Safety and Health, Taskforce on the Electronics Industry, 1981. 4. Industrial Hygiene Characterization of Photovoltaic Solar Cell Industry. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (DHHS), National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Technical Report Publication No. 80-112. March, 1980. 5. Cox, J.D., and Rossi, D.A., "LSI Semiconductor Manufacturing". In: Cralley, L.V., and Cralley, L.J. (eds.) Unit Operations and Product Fabrication. New York: MacMillan, 1984. (Cralley, L.V., and Cralley, L.J. (eds.) Industrial Hygiene Aspects of Plant Operations: vol. 2). 6. Stewart, J.H., and Elkington, K.J., "Electronics: Semiconductor Manufacturing". In: Cralley, L.V., and Cralley, L.J. (eds.) Engineering Considerations in Equipment Selection. Layout, and Building Design. New York: MacMillan, 1985. (Cralley, L.V., and Cralley, L.I. (eds.) Industrial Hygiene Aspects of Plant Operations: vol. 3.) 7. Environmental Chemistry Department, Systems and Measurements Division (Research Triangle Institute): Hazard Assessment of the Electronic Component Manufacturing Industry. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 85-100. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, February 1985. 8. LaDou, J., (ed.) The Microelectronics Industry. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus, Inc., Jan.-Mar., 1986. (State of the Art Reviews: Occupational Medicine; vol. 1 - No. 1.) 9. Ungers, L.J., Jones, J.H., Mclntyre, A.J., and McHenry, C.R., "Release of Arsenic from Semiconductor Wafers*. Am. Ind. Hve. Assoc. J.. 46:416-20, 1985. 10. Ungers, L.J., Jones, J.H., Mihlan, "Emission of Radio-Frequency Radiation from Plasma-Etching Operations". Submitted for publication. 11. Sorahan, T., Waterhouse, J., McKiernan, M., et. al., "Cancer Incidence and Cancer Mortality in a Cohort of Semiconductor Workers:. Br. J. Tnd. Med.. 42:546-550, 1985. -117- image: ------- 5.2 Electronic Components. NEC (SIC 3679) 5.2.1 Introduction Electronic components, not elsewhere classified (SIC 3679) is the third largest industrial classification in Santa Clara County, with a total employment of 23,849. This SIC, like other "not elsewhere classified" SIC's, does not denote a homogeneous group of establishments, but rather encompasses a diversity of enterprises, from makers of phonograph needles to makers of radio headphones. However, in Santa Clara County, the most conspicuous type of business within this classification is the assembly or manufacture of printed circuit boards. We included this SIC in the industry profiles on the basis of its high level of employment in the county and its extensive use of a number of hazardous materials, particularly solder flux, solder (containing lead), solvents, and electroplating solutions and materials. In addition, this industry contributes to Santa Clara County occupational illness statistics in proportions above what would be expected on the basis of its employment. 5.2.2 Demographics In sharp contrast to the other large electronics SIC's in Santa Clara County (SIC's 3573, 3662, and 3674), which are dominated by very large firms -- i.e., firms with over . 1,000 employees -- SIC 3679 owes most of its employment share to medium and small firms. Of the 23,849 persons employed in the SIC according to the NIOSH Industrial File, 12,474 (52%) work in firms with fewer than 250 total employees, and 3,579 (15% of the total) work in firms with fewer than 50 employees. One thousand three hundred fifty workers (5.7% of the total) are employed in firms with less than 20 workers. Of the 374 total Santa Clara firms in SIC 3679, 203 have fewer than 50 employees, while only 8 have over 500 employees, and only 3 have over 1,000 employees. 5.2.3 Printed Circuit Board Fabrication As noted, the most significant business type among Santa Clara County establishments in SIC 3679 is printed circuit board fabrication. The manufacture of printed circuit boards can basically be broken down into electroplating operations, in which desired circuit patterns are plated onto sheets of epoxy-fiberglass, and assembly operations, in which integrated circuits are soldered onto the electroplated boards. Some firms perform both types of operations, while others specialize. The general overall cycle of operations involves cutting the fiberglass boards to size, laminating them with plastic (or sometimes, metal), silk-screening a circuit pattern onto the board using an electroplate resist, electroplating the board to deposit conductive metal in the desired pattern, drilling holes in the board to allow attachment of integrated circuits and other electronic components, and then soldering electronic components onto the board. Various cleaning processes are used throughout the cycle. Some operations may involve variations or different ordering of these processes. Because the operations in printed circuit board fabrication involve basic industrial processes, the hazards present, and the appropriate methods for controlling them, are similar to other industries in which these processes are used (e.g. ordinary electroplating shops). AS these processes have been well-established in industry for many years, processes, they have also been well characterized in the industrial hygiene literature. The -118- image: ------- predominant health risks in SIC 3679 may differ from these other industries, however, in that certain materials and processes (e.g. cyanide, in both electroplating and electroplate resist silk-screening) may tend to be more prevalent due to the specific product of the industry, while others (e.g. grinding to prepare surf aces'for electroplating) may tend to be less prevalent or absent. 5.2.4 Potential Exposures To assess potential exposures in SIC 3679, we reviewed the two national surveys performed by NIOSH the National Occupational Hazard Survey (1974) and the National Occupational Exposure Survey (1985). Again, due to the heterogenous nature of this classification, the materials and exposure potentials identified in the survey may not apply to every type of operation within the SIC. Materials used specifically in printed-circuit board fabrication cannot be separated from the other materials identified by the surveys for the SIC. 5.2.4.1 National Occupational Hazard Survey (NOHS) For the NOHS, NIOSH surveyed 26 firms in SIC 3679, with a total employment of 7,188. The survey identified 379 hazardous substances used in the SIC. On the basis of the Industrial Risk Index, rating the extent and hazardousness of substances found in the survey, SIC 3679 ranked only in the top 30%, out of 412 industries ranked. However, using NOHS data, but applying OSHA's hazard severity weights and ranking system (OSHA Weighted Index, or OWI), SIC 3679 ranked in the top 20% of 549 industries ranked. (For an explanation of the IRI and OWI ranking systems, see Section 4 of this report). The OSHA weighted index for the eighty most serious hazards in the industry (as determined by the index) is shown in Table 5.2-1. As seen in the table, the hazards with the highest weighted indices were mostly lead compounds (26 out of the top 40 OWI hazards), which are found in electroplating solutions and solder; solvents (e.g. xylene, toluene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane) found in degreasing or cleaning steps in both electroplating and assembly; and acids, found in electroplating baths. 5.2.4.2 National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES) For the NOES, NIOSH surveyed 36 firms, with a total employment of 20,729 workers. The survey identified a total of 416 substances, compounds, and -hazards (including physical stresses, e.g. "finger manipulations"). The substances identified, the number and percentage of workers exposed among those surveyed, and the number of female workers exposed, are shown in Table 5.2-2. It can be seen in the table that fewer than 2% of the surveyed workers were exposed to most of the hazardous substances identified. The ten substances with the highest percentages of the 20,729 workers surveyed potentially exposed were solder SOE (10.74%), isopropyl alcohol (9.00%), solder flux SOE (7.14%), lubricant (constituents not identified, 4.88%), freons (3.97%), acetone (3.52%), 2-butanone (3.12%), 1,1,1-trichloroethane (3.00%), cutting oil (constituents not identified, 2.79%), and glass cleaner (constituents not identified. 2.76%). Lead compounds were not specifically identified in this survey apart from other compounds (e.g. solder) in which they were present. Other substances of note identified in the survey were chromic acid (111 workers identified as exposed, or .54%), 2-ethoxyethyl acetate (ethylene glycol monoethyl ether acetate, 123 workers exposed, or .59%), and silicon dust (142 workers exposed, or .69%). -119- image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 3679 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS. NEC. Table 5.2-1 OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS —NOHS SURVEYED—- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 7.188 26 1 I—1 to o IHFOM CODE 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 2037 2310 9210 1591 06-86 1591 1720 2460 2611 1430 2590 2490 5010 1591 1591 C0320 1591 2020 1591 0874 1591 1591 1591 1591 0686 0686 1591 1591 1590 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 NOHS CODE M0126 42685 M0125 81000 81677 84544 M2829 70870 94220 91160 81876 84546 46970 73300 77150 38580 76720 73790 52131 M0124 84473 09070 M1015 54790 84278 24130 82952 84545 A1297 M0751 M0814 M0886 M1387 M1685 42510 80252 80832 81877 83015 83062 8JGBO DESCRIPTION LEAD TETROXIDE LEAD OXIDES LEAD MONOXIDE LEAD SUBOXIDE LEAD TRIOXIDE LEAD DIOXIDE PETROLEUM SPIRITS SULFURIC ACID WOODS INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS CHROMIC ACID, LEADC2O SALT UU) LEAD SULFATE TRICHLOROETHANE. 1,1,1- TOLUEHE ZINC CHLORIDE HYDROGEN CHLORIDE XYLENE EFHYLENE, TRICHLORO- OIL, CUTTING LEAD BOROFLUORIDE . LEAD NITRATE BENZENE LEAD BOROSILICATE TETRACHLOROETHYLENE LEAD TITANATES DICHLOROETHANE. 1,2- LEAD GERMANATE LEAD SILICATE LEAD CARBONATE, BASIC LEADED ZINC OXIDE LEAD CHROMATE. LEAD MOLYBDATE, LEAD SULFATE COMPLEX LEAD CHROMATE, MOLYBDATED LEAD HYDROXIDE LEAD BORATE LEAD ARSENATE LEAD CARBONATE LEAD CHLOROSILICATE COMPLEX LEAD PHOSPHITE LEAD FLUORIDE LEAD SULFATE. TRIBASIC LEAD ZIRCOMATE EXPOSURE FACTOR 1.211 1.200 1.175 1.148 1.148 1.148 810 1.056 655 617 615 615 864 855 596 825 803 796 553 550 547 545 516 719 503 497 476 472 467 467 467 467 467 467 467 467 467 467 467 467 467 EXPOSURE INDEX .168 .166 ,163 .159 .159 .159 .112 .146 .091 .085 .085 .085 .120 .118 .082 .114 .111 .110 .076 .076 .076 .075 .071 .100 .069 .069 .066 .065 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 10 10 10 10 07 07 10 07 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 WEIGHTED INDEX 1.684 1.669 1.634 1.597 1.597 1.597 1.126 1.028 .911 .858 .855 .855 .841 .832 .829 .803 .781 .775 .769 .765 .760 .758 .717 .700 .699 .691 .662 .656 .649 .649 .649 .649 .649 .649 .649 .649 .649 .649 .649 .649 .649 image: ------- ~ 5.2 (2) C INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 79 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, NEC. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTfc* I ION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY HEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS —-NOHS SURVEYED—- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 7,188 26 1 t- to L^ r^ I IHFOM CODE 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 2432 2432 2432 1280 9050 5010 1660 0527 1060 9090 2000 I860 0374 1290 2532 1591 1010 1460 1941 0170 9030 1060 1913 0290 0570 0760 0494 2060 1842 2040 2229 2240 NOHS CODE 83081 83299 83436 83915 84433 84439 84743 M0877 73253 82157 81945 84055 52138 45930 80243 31500 17366 M0600 50742 80517 3364.0 82880 83453 25145 38550 51090 05250 71055 M0238 32385 90320 17490 20380 15630 57740 50495 55460 111463 niS04 DESCRIPTION LEAD ZIRCONATE TITANATE LEAD MOLYfrOATE LEAD PHOSPHATE, DIBASIC LEAD PHOSPHATE. TRIBASIC LEAD SULFIDE LEAD CHLORIDE LEAD SILICOCHROMATE STANNIC OXIDE TIN OXIDES STANNOUS OXIDE POTASSIUM BIFLUORIDE SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED OIL, LUBE METHANOL CARBON ETHYL ALCOHOL GRAPHITE PARAFFIN NITRIC ACID SODIUM BORATE FORMALDEHYDE PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER lE/,0 NAPHTHENATE DIOXANE, 1,4- HYDF.OGEN FLUORIDE NITROPROPANE, 2- AMnOHIA TALC ALCOHOL ETHYLENE GLYCOL ASPHALT CARBON TETRACHLORIDE CRESOL CADMIUM OXIDES PHOSPHINE NICKEL OXIDES PHEHOL IRON OXIDE. RED SILVER POWDER EXPOSURE FACTOR 467 467 467 467 467 467 467 616 612 610 421 587 409 569 382 1,260 527 359 322 436 302 427 289 283 280 275 391 390 687 264 252 249 247 215 223 222 216 280 268 EXPOSURE INDEX .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .085 .085 .084 .058 .081 .056 .079 .053 .175 .073 .049 .044 .060 .042 .059 .040 .039 .038 .038 .054 .054 .123 .036 .035 .034 .034 .032 .031 .030 .030 .038 .037 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 07 07 10 07 10 07 10 03 07 10 10 07 10 07 10 10 10 10 07 07 03 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 07 WEIGHTED INDEX .649 .649 .649 .649 .649 .649 .649 .599 .595 .594 .585 .571 .569 .554 .531 .525 .513 .499 .447 .424 .420 .415 .402 .393 .389 .382 .380 .379 .370 .367 .350 .346 .343 .326 .310 .308 .300 .272 .260 379 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3679 OTHER TOTALS: 72,097 9.834 66.697 image: ------- Table 5.2-2 NIOSH National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES) as of January 17, 1986, for SIC 3679, Electronic Components Not Elsewhere Classified to fj I NUMBER OF PLANTS SURVE.YED NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES ON PAYROLL SMALL MEDIUM LARGE TOTAL SMALL MEDIUM LARGE TOTAL 9 20 7 36 389 4311 16029 20729 image: ------- P?OIC «• -10 "ri E'S f.~tf i P i TON" " Y v., j i.7 ^L E" OCSCRIPMON •'..ML « » * xnoob x«xxx xVoio 5 1C "Yi" 4 I-I .?,.*?.. .Ob .00 ,00 ,"o"i)" ,00 • 4 • * .---.. ** •\b~ % r n DESCRIPTION OESCH1PUOU A VM LABILE: AVAILABLE * 4 4 VUll l .05 .(•I • •• r.o DESCRIPTION PESCRIPTION AVAILABLE I 44 I 4 * 77 ,37 xno-}7 XoU'5 .uo .1-0 V» «' 444 **• *»*v i.'J DESCRIPTION MO PLSC'MPIION rVAlUPLE > 4 • I 4* I 6 ...«t. /.VAILA.HE "A'VA'ILA'HLE AVAILABLE * 4 * 444' XO(HI .'U .00 ,i»n * * * »*• :.0 \0 * •• * * • X0043 I .C5 ..P.I. 11 2 .00 .00 xnouu Xn«62 ii'iOl" II '?"*' ..P.6. .!*• ."I II a 2 ,«P .'•ib' ,0" 4*4 "i 4 4 4 '.0 ? n AVAIL/. BLE RESCRIPT IOM i 4 * i 4 4 ..o AVAILABLE * 4 * • • 4 » * 'iO AVAILABLE 44* « 4 4 ^ XP023 "xob26 It. o ,6i) »« '.0 PESCRIPTION AVAILABLE »44 4* -.0 DESCRIPTION AVAIL/.PLE 44* »• 'JO INSCRIPTION 444 4 4 * ,<*0 .f-0 PESCRIPTIOH > 4 4 > 4 4 AVAILABLE AVAILABLE "AVAlO.flLC" AVAJLAMLE X«OI3 7 17 1552 3 'i .03 ..??. ,00 ,1.0 44^70 44 ..0 DESCRIPTION * 4 4 « 4 4 7 no . . ViT x-1014 X006I 278 25 34 ,12 21)3 4 .00 .00" .00 •4« to DESCRIPTION V;YTO"DESCRIPTI;JN- • «• -10 DESCRIPTION AVAILABLE 444 * 4 4 I 4 4 I 4* X0017 3C 35 .15 17 . "0 >0 ••• JO O ABUA3IVE AVAILABLE ••• SHOT ii. JIOOI J1002 JO 300 58. 4 10 .63 .??. .02 20 3 .00 .00 .uo .00 ,\flSORSE"T, LIQUID T. SOLID JI006 BO 1 op 01568 15 (17 l|6 ..». .56 .,05. 2rt 95 TFT -" ? V«o -::- ACCElERATOH "ACEtiC"AClb" ACF.MC »CIO "•.rF."* ir"«"t(h", ETHYL ESTfu image: ------- ., c_. _ : nu[_y c'»nt i •: 03897 JI072 JI075 JI071 BOQ|6 Jill Ib 2i'2b5 35250 0^270 ftiM5« J<»399 9?fl jo f. 7 n 3 5 P 2 0 0 3 0,IJ|0 3*155 P?OCl M I-V7-J5 fo jn]c2 "•" jjjjj; •I"*! MII 127 80036 J0262 904PO BOQ12 X0022 XOQ7I I 0 | 0 b < OQ6 3 J'H90 7/9 1 16 31 '163 9 3 52 15 1 no H 3 35 1 i I?i7 II 1" q H u ...17. \f 1 55 67 55 35 P _!*.... 13 -HKM3 .56 1 OC J5 2.23 i) i .17 ."1 .25 *'!' .0-4 .17 .'"•I .CI i . n 6*n! 107 "og .05 0? .29 *C3 !?7 .32 1,15 .27 .17 ..il .91 .08 .20 .06 5-4? '19 Ufr 1 t> a '10 3 16 3 !•» 1 51 u 26 1 01 79U 1 5 <( II 2 4 15 33 63 '22 7 2 5 2 b 2 '.'•ft' .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .UO .00 ;ili! ^"° ^00 "on .00 ,uO /"° 0 0 i) 0 .00 .(•0 ,,,o 00 •*lo« .00 .00 .00 .00 '.00 .00 .-°° ' H\ZA r' »ESC»IPT i'jfj" ' ACT1V»TOK MOOITIVE. I-EC AP'IESIVE, AWl'lAL-RL'-'E .lOMESiVE. SYr.f'iETIC-lJESl:: ,.IR FRESHEl.ER ;.L.nALU.'I«UM-Mp .....Kf-Qw., ;.LUMIMJ'- OXIDE /.»»'OMJM BIFLUl'WIPE '.••MO'.'rjM CHLORIDE A" 'O.MliM 3ULFATE A''TI'.SIEZE CO^PO'.i'-lL* /.':TlFn/,''ING ARE'.'T .\fiT lOXJO-^K'T A'lTISEPTlC A5DESTjsSP°IJT3 AM, COLO-MF uNKH3h*j hE:iZE'iŁS"L'LFOI»IC .'.CIO, P-l (P-(Pi'»E'MVL t •lI'!n)PHE'i4VL)470)-, flLEACHI'-C AGENTS nnjLER rtATER TRE.-.T MEMT CHE"IC/.L BOF.A'.'E BTR-iTE ( i-) { TETR..FL"ORO-» LEAPC?*) (loft ;TE( I.)* fET iJ.,FLUURO-t ^f?i(2+) GIRAX nor ic ACID nn/>L CLEANER BfJASS, CU, Zfi, P'j r.ROUP ('IOHS-I ONLY) nwT flK'T ..LUMif.'UM B^T NATURAL GAS OPT STAINLESS STEEL OUT STEEL O'lFFING COliPOUMO" OUTANOL image: ------- '• .IKHTPS '.„..- "VtAf -% X.:cr')'.LFr taoie :>.Ł-« IHJ: nut a 1 1 1*0 .2 ?/>«*. XA6Q7 17 Jt>7 8106° l57t«S 17595 P?nl1 57 I'l 1 0 31 M 1* 5 1 «• 2 ** ' .'Ji .15 !o2 ."1 7? 7< ."3 01 * .wO .WO ,00 ;!I5 .CO .on ,uO > ',/! 1) >! BUTYL ACE CUE C.I. I3P2P-1CID RED f C.'.irBIDE C.\i{''OU PLACK C.'pnn1.1 DIOXIDE CM'RfViic ACID ••o'i'osiii'Tiiv SALT" C'.KBO'JJC ACID, CALCJ"11 StLT fltl) , C;.T&L»ST CAT'lijI'i lUV t'J3"E" CAUSTIC CLEriE»< J«»37? 1 n .00 CE it'IT, ^cc .on CHE'-IC/.L, f i .01 I .ob c»*l;6»"fc .«c"io (n'ifiRo"). f»is;ff>iu-' svif « 02 ^A\°...A^n.'!!c_.r-OOJ.!«2C^ 6B900 1 M KJ Ul 1 J«337 J*»I57 Jft23« JOI9A J0026 |9769 J|>2:)I 2tQ64 •0610 9JM75 20155 02130 BI735 40020 21660 II .f'5 2* .H o . 'Ji 126 .h| 19 .21 239 ».I5 f.2 .Hfi 13 .06 **\ '"it M .0? "39 2.1^ 3AI 1."^ 0 00 00 00 0» 00 00 oo 00 00 00 00 [HCO UU CLEA'.'FP CUE:. 'EF; CLEi;iEP CLE/AEP CLE.«!- i PI •I * X, N( ».!!'I(3HSl-flE'20XATMIOL-3-YLinENE)aiS(6.R«OMO-, S, LP.-JF UNK)l6H? »NO:JE J FOi-OER 233 1.17Vi.»0 jo2«3 I .01 '.00 DELI'^INC AGElJf eoboij" « !o2 ".'"''""oEbi'inYZt'rt \r TUT image: ------- C'IDE l"ll J02I5 J'Jl? JIOI» P071C v>n]QO •4 P?00^ ft"02'» TI651 7«o|n 31500 3?305 764 45 7379^ 91J95 33.J'45 J«362 j5?23 Ł\l* J«3I« JI02I , jut 15 JM13 n JOII« JI022 I......JI023.. JW 3JB95 7 1 60S •4 1 | Jo 3'i'«55 rt-m:.vi- l" li t Q 30 3 11 1?? II 25 o5 1 57 Irt JO 2133 1 'fo 37? 6 b u .02.3... . 7 73 •v-^krw- .07 .15 .91 ]o.'4 .15 .Ji [l7 ' -it .?'! "12 .59 .01 !r»._. .15 JO... !02 J'l 22... .0.1 .'M 7. 11 .03 .05... '.'^ .•»! ....A. ?.?... ."3 :55 ^'«^3 q 1 Mi 3 2 5 29 2 27 2b 17 ol 25 27 1 M43 3 fl 1635 8 2 137 IO&7 5 51 J 561 I 69 " - ni — 73 :°R!<|IJOS .00 ,00 .00 'oo._ .1)0 fno .00 .no .00 .OJ .oft .00 '.6(T .00 IoO .00 .00 J.DO .00 .00 •.c.c .••0 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ,00 ...c .HO .f-0 .•'0 ".ob" '.oo !iAZAiESCii"iPTl')'4 DESE'.'SITjZJ'jG AGE' T iiETfRCE'.t jFVTLOPEU I-EVELOPER REPLE'HSHER OICHLORP*'ETH,\MŁ t FLUX, SOLDER I f-iG S0Ł FLUX, SOLDERING S'lT FLUX, Ti»l'E FURA1;, TETRAHYDRO FURNITURE POLISH image: ------- Table 5.2-2 (6): NOES" ,. "... »'.**«.... 6IHS* 97470 i, Jfl|b6 JAI7I P201-5 J592S 3*OtoO 1*^1 JH?S? P rt |> 2 1* ft 00 | t 9752S JI092 ^ JMS9 M J0|67 i 92760 JM5JJ jo |?5 9255" J03M ., 40200 Q0030 33)6Q MOI30 ,i HIQ63 ., TI768 x3nl7 J*I65 SM* '* n (Co 32 35 i 22 3'.'. |C5 7b 97 37" 2 /i 13 3 37 7 35 90 •42 2 136 1 1- 5 7 13 1965 23 187 13 ^':7i. ."3 .02 1.5 J P. 92 .11 .Jo ."3 -79 !?o .37 1 1" II •JJ .CO .'H ."1 J7 .20 .30 .01 .06 .01 .02 .03 9.00 .11 .90 .06 1\R an a 119 I1* 'l« 6 241 20 53 109 51 5 25 2C1 1 9 2 131 9 20 . **" .Oft '"••n "oS O'l ->° .UU .00 on .OP ' 0" .00 ' (HI .00 >0 ,uO ."0 .00 .00 ;»II ..-0 .00 ,«.o .00 .00 .00 ,00 .no ,0tf .00 .00 .60 >0 GLASS CI.EAIIEK ".... GLASS, Si Lit A GI E/.SE G'J i i«b~i re co-.MlfiWo GUf'S M-.'vrE'ER3T"M*''IPULAT1":ri I'FLIU" MYf.whciiLnPic ACID tllL'ftOCcl,' FLL'MHIoE. HVI.P'JGEN PtrtOxib'I' T'P/.CT dUIJE IlrOIC'TOR 1'H'IhITdR II K, COPY I"G TJK| '-IET.-.L MARKING I'K, PRll.TI-it I'-K, ST. \rPI.VG I;:K, STEf-CR p'Stcf ic'in"Ł INSULATION I'lSULATIOH, ELECTRIC/,!. IODIC ^CIO (HI03)» PflT,-.SSIU'« SaLT !2oi"cMLOPIDE JFE^LS) IRON OKI ft" (FE'O) 1PQN OXIrE (FE203) IS'JPRQPVL ALCOHOLl KiESELG'JHR LACQUER LACQUER ^MlMfTE"ft • L/irfirif, CPVPOUMO image: ------- 1 II. .- n ... 11 u •• w ,/„ . i CnOE jnjlfl P20l»9 p«a|B 9257(. JoJJj e"3nl R 1 2 7 '4 8MM «s!Jo 375IP j"i?J 9?MO ••.1347 5«"o 5 n a 75 i.>n 45 1 2 55 12 31 f. 11 22 2.... 1 62 3 69.... 1 52 I 70 95 a 57* i 3-S I IS 120 l . I.: .i. . •'' •' .15 1.29 .3t> 4.A6 .59 .01 0? .*>! .01 i^c .15 .02 .3? .•^ . .0.1.... .11 *30 I?l.... .<>2 ".25 '!P.I..__ .3'4 .«.*.... .02 ?.7=» .(*! .?.?.„. ,->7 .01 rc •:.». t i ' .-.'ORKctS «'f 1 (I . 552 101 1 1 1 *l 1 3 20 56 3 1 22 27 1 1 22 1 40 2 73 9 26 24 : ;_ -. i_ » JRKffiS i-IM? .00 ...,-'!?.. ,oc • ;;j .00 .00 .«"' .00 '!!° .no ...J>.?.. .«"> >o ...,'.".9.. ..J.I?.. . >' 0 dO .00 .00 ...,.?»-. %o .00 '.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 T4ble 5,2-2 (7_): NOES 1 \ZA.»D CŁSCPrpfl3" LAVoi'T FLUID LEC i TMI *s LIFTING- POSTURES LICHT/GLA*Ł LEVEL LO'IG *AVŁ PADIP FFEOUEICV LI'B-'IC.AM .'"4 i.'icKEL CAMBONATE »;ICKŁL CHLORIDE "TC*EL SULFA'lATE MC^EL SULFATE IMTRJC ACID SILVEHCIO sar f.!n!oc?IniŁYH*'lni" ?'S'^"" MTHOCCN (CRYOGE''Ic LIQUID) IIYL'OU (HOMS-1 6""LV) UCT/vOECEr.OIC AGIO JZ-), ZINC S image: ------- Table 5-M«3 5? l-«1 J-M55 e«ij! JoSso JlOh** J«I70 J0390 P2000 , HM75 69330 6MS3 1 t 3ou ^ , .5*5.29 * .. 70795 J037S J0295 8*117 ii P fl 0 3 3 Mft522 » J02AO . 9?700 9?720 „ 0n 1 06 AI3S'I 612/5 80197 3 22 65 S 7 1" '1 2 11.... 30 1 0 u 1033 13 2 4 '• 1 ..22.. . 2 (i 23 6.... 23 IS 273 65 12 • OS 11 I p Q 5 ft n 2 .•I .3! .02 03 .09 'o's .is "•V a;^6 .... !«.« .11 ."7 .01 .1.1 .01 .02 .'I .U .11 0,, .07 1.32 .. .20 .11 .06 .5. ."6 .01 .53 1 . '•• ^ !oi 71 IP. 2 7 a 1 1 5 1 SUB 23 1 4 Jl I 1 '1 10 5 3 125 2P 17 46 96 4 26 10 1 .t'O . tiO f 1 (1 . U 0 '!,'? .on .I'O .00 .0" ,oO .00 .MO .(•0 '.00 .00 A U u 0 .00 .00 .0» .00 ,.q?_. '"'! .1'" .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 >0 .uo .00 OIL, »'.e.c. nit. Pt:iŁTPnTIflG OIL* OUErJC»«I,;G OIL, I^PPI-'G P-CKI'-'G CO'^PhufJO p- DO PIG Cii"PO-j;jn "Pi. IKT THIH'.E'R PAI''T, 'CS'YLIC PMf.'T., .'LKYi> PMf T. E"OXY PALLADIUM CHLORIDE P/IUFFI" "AXES AND HYprMCAROtV- -lAXtS P.'SSIVE.Pu5TURE3 PEROXYDISl'LFl'RIC ACID ( ( (H'.i)3(0)2)2(12) , Ot •.^'OKIU" S..L1 pEKiXYbisi'LFL'Vic ACii>i((no")S(^)2)2"C)?i, D'isiM"i> S"/.LT PETMOLE"' liAPHTHA ^DSpi!^11"1'48 PHOSPHihlC ACID. 3001"'' S.'.Lf PHjSPHCIPIC iCID PKlSPH.lKflC '.do! TRISCOIl'1' S»LT PMriTj Pf;SlSI ^HCTDC-R^Pf'IC CHEMICtL, 'EC p"S!ocS5ph!c KSEi?S!iB PIPE JUI.M SEALER PL,.SMC3 PLACING sdLilYl'oil POLISH * POLYCHL6R~lffATED"6YPWEK'YLS POLYESTER HESINS POLYETHEK PfSlN POLYMERS, ORGANIC' POL YURE THANE RE3IN ( image: ------- Table 5.2-2 (9): NOES HAZA-iO TOT'L C'lOE " .jOKKE»«3 bidO" ? ,'M .»° POTASSIU" Anobi " 2 '<>! I .'"» POT/SSiii*1"r'lCHI'O^i TE~(VO 60'Kip 4* 32 56 ^Jl!) PQTtSSIU" tiYDHC-XI^C "m'bjfi1 .•»! """ .''"i' ff'TuSSlUI lUt'IDt bfl '."0 -PC, TASSIMH PEKM.yJt Mil" si "25 27 "" '.V««""PnffI'NC'cO^POijYiP' 26 !l3 I" 12 .06 7 x526j 5y> f25 3 .00 pnnnucTS OF coi'-HJ-'HOn-ALCOHOLS .-.no SHJMT CHAIN 6?525 15 [i>7 !5 ^oO P( I ? l.'lO .00 RpSi;j. PDLYPROPYLE Jf JOJ»|A ?? ,2-{ 25 ,00 RfSIfJ, STYRE.-IE JI'O'JH ]"«" .V7~ ."o6""Ruuiit:"R",""A"cf "&"'* ."(i6""SaN"6"rNG"DIS"K I 01 I .00 SCRATCH REltOVEH TT« Ttao ?Ti T^o SEALANT P0652 2f' 10 6 ^oO SEGMENTAL "IpKATinf; X'OOO'1 10 *05 ". 60"""sH"A"LE"i"EX"PA"l"l|JlEDV"4C"""""'""' P?00« 80 39 21 '^00 SHqyLpER-T.RANSPORtS VJ5S6 M3 '.i\ 2 ~.6b~"~3ii.~AME, TRICHLCRf)-" • 7S25 21 .10 1? '.00 SILICON CARBIDE "^ ^775 Tl .TO SILICON, DUST MIOC2 •» .94 1 '.i'« SILICOr!E..RESI/4 •"* Rii'is" \~n~~ 05 '• ".ob" SIL'VCH CYAlMOt " DIllJ !• .WJ f ».w — bbTbb M7 .21 8 .°0 S('AP _ --.-_-^. , • • • •• 1 ' J - ' J J .i;----.-Mtbss.":"""";"r^""""".'>2""V"" i-v.""""Lii"j"''"^.-^ ^—*fi-— --- - •—•----—->-—^—•--• - - image: ------- i • tp ,7 „ Ml 994 J0250 JOI7I J"||9 J-II7 JIO 12 ,, J"I69 •."71* 17/175 Mil? 71- IIP 70670 I 11230 Ł" "50700 i., 929'lrt 80151 81716 ;, 6"710 i. 71100 xiooo n M095 „ U6970 92950 po«io 92960 n ..^66(2 B0029 ?•••> t i •* • » "7 7 1 o 1 1 6 51 «!• 1 t 15 117 1 1 | .°l .12 .0.1 .17 .01 .01 .70 .jo .'•1 "HZ ,09 I 01 .12 .77 ."1 .08 1^00 .11 .01 06 .01 .21 .01 .'•1 rfhRKi-IS 2 2"" ?)5 1617 loo 301 1. 26 3* 1 81 1 1 2 51 15 1 1 1 55 an II 112 21 27 2 1 6 a • - . • v.*_ . . n|;Kt f>3 %6 ' UO .00 .00 .110 .00 .till .(•0 !i'« .«'" .on !«o .0" .(•0 .10 >«l ;..n ."0 .on .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .no .00 .00 V00 . .00 ...0 .00 '.00 .00 SODIUM COP PEP cvANiof : SDUIU" CV«f|It-E 50- ill*- ri.ii(«illnE ,50,. It'" MY'«KOXlnE 30; fi'*i SULFItE" S"LOEB, UEc SOLi'ER. f.OE finl.VE**!, ^Liiu'Ri'iJATEn" SOLVENT. HEC SI-l'CH fiOiiS-l ONLY) a^tEL ("'-l**3"il ^"''LY) S * ;•' 1 P P I IJC C lV«TOi INO STMPPlNp SOLUTIOH S"LF;."IC ^CI^ 3'ILF'JRIC .'CIO COPPER(2») S'.LT (lj») SULFU'JiC AClf'» lrtD«.(2») V/.LT (iiH 1/>'lTARIC *CIt'» M3HOPf)t A5SIIJ" . W(jNl)SH01Uvi SALT I E t R A C I !L O^Ott if V L ŁfmtJ'ri. Tlii.'FUiES f'LL'E'lE TOLUOL TO:JŁR fRICilLOiioYt^ANE Ti'.IS"M" HATERLE3S HAND CLtAfltn • 1 f • -« .r_ . (V|. V ) image: ------- Table 5.2-2 (11): NOES __ a-'-iLh._t!E._ELlul5._fi.iiil5J.LIŁQ ___ f ' ............... "" .......... " ....... ................... " ........ " ........ "S^LL ' ^"Euii.i^" ' LA4GE ..... TOTAL" . src nbTT cicrT'tQNic f.P"Po-E:."s. ' EC _____ 2 _ 12 _ Z _ ii. r , HAZARD TOT»L * TOT, a FE--I.-.I.E x CODE ,,6^KŁH5 ••T»«'KEf>S .'OHKLHS ••JOKKfPs ' HiZ-dfO ntSC« I°f I lU. JOI.i5 50 .!P .,__. 77I9Q •> !oi 'j"0 Z"'C 77^^rt I .01 I .f-O ZINC 3ULFJTE f i, ....7.71.15. j.i. .p.5 jL9?...-.ZL1jL.z.!MCr."f-.y.N.?.'l-l):1'J. 14. ll I •^ ::- U) K). I II image: ------- 5.2.5 Actual Exposures To assess actual monitored exposure levels in SIC 3679, we reviewed three sources, federal OSHA inspection data, NIOSH Health Hazard Evaluations and CAL/OSHA inspection files from Santa Clara County inspections. 5.2.5.1 Federal OSHA Inspection Data, 1979-1982 In the four years (1979-82) for which data were available, OSHA conducted 90 inspections in SIC 3679, during which 581 exposure samples were taken, involving 87 substances. Altogether, 17 of the samples taken (2.9%), involving 10 substances, were above the PEL. However, in reviewing the OSHA data, it is important to note also those substances with monitored exposures at a significant proportion of the PEL, even if no measurement was actually above the PEL. Of substances contained in the OSHA data, twelve had exposures at or above 50% of the PEL. These substances, along with pertinent OSHA data, are shown in Table 5.2-3. Based on the 1979-82 OSHA inspection results for substances of all hazard weights (OSHA hazard weights l,3,7,or 10), the IBER ranking system ranks SIC 3679 276th out of 475 industries ranked. If only exposure data for substances with more severe hazard weights (7 or 10) are used to rank industries, SIC 3679 receives an IBER ranking of 296 out of 475 industries ranked. (For an explanation of the IBER system, see Section 4 of this report.) Thus, relative to other major federally inspected industries, SIC 3679 did not have especially severe actual exposures. It should nonetheless be noted that three quite toxic substances for which high exposures were found, lead arsenate, lead carbonate, and trichloroethylene, were also identified in NOHS or NOES as having potential exposures to comparatively high numbers of workers in this SIC. Other important hazards identified in the NOHS and NOES, however, such as chromic acid and 1,1,1-trichloroethane, did not have any sampled exposure above 50% of the OSHA PEL. 5.2.5.2 CAL/OSHA Inspection Data To determine substances sampled and exposure levels actually found in Santa Clara County firms in SIC 3679, we reviewed CAL/OSHA inspection records for eleven Santa Clara County firms in the SIC, encompassing a total of fifteen inspections. In the fifteen inspections reviewed, twenty substances were encountered; the substances and monitoring results are shown in Table 5.2-4. In addition to the substances shown in the table, some inspection summaries contained company information on the constituents of electroplating solutions, solder masks, and other materials used, which were not monitored. Constituents named in individual summaries included lead fluoroborate, copper, copper sulfate, stannous tin, tin-nickel alloy, hydrogen cyanide, gold cyanide, silver cyanide, I-nitropropane, 2-nitropropane, and dichloromethane (in various plating solutions); epoxy resins, glycol ethers, 4,4-diaminodiphenylmethane, and dimethylformamide (in solder masks); and diethylene glycol monobutyl ether acetate (in plating resists); as well as various substances (e.g. sulfuric and hydrochloric acids) already listed in Table 5.2-4. As shown in Table 5.2-4, no overexposures were detected in any of the fifteen CAL/OSHA inspections reviewed. Various citations were issued in these inspections, however, including citations for violations of the lead standard (GISO 5216, four companies cited) and corrosive liquids standard (GISO 5162, four companies cited), and for failure to use hand protection with methylene chloride (two companies cited under two different standards). -133- image: ------- Table 5.2-3 Federal OSHA Inspection Data for SIC 3679: Substances with Sampled Exposures at or above 501 of the OSHA PEL 1 H-1 UJ 1 Substance Cyclohexanone Isopropyl Alcohol Lead Arsenate Lead Carbonate Basic Manganese Methyl Ethyl Ketone Methyl ene Chloride Mercury Nuisance Oust Tetrahydrofuran Trichloroethylene Trichlorotrifluoroethane Num of Insps 1 4 20 21 2 10 6 2 6 2 1 5 Num of Samples 5 7 59 65 12 19 10 7 21 5 4 9 Mean Proptn of PEL 0.38 0.33 0;07 0.02 0.36 0.07 0.16 0.56 0.44 0.40 1.0ft 0.25 Max Proptn of PEL 0.88 1.25 2.06 0.61 2.65 0.80 0.51 1.60 6.91 1.72 1.57 0.83 Num Insp w/ some snp > PEL 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 I 1 1 1 0 Num Insp w/ mean > PEL 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 Num samps over PEL 0 3 1 0 2 0 0 2 3 1 2 0 Source: OSHA MIS 1979-82. image: ------- Table 5.2-4 CAL/OSHA Inspection Data: Substances Encountered and Exposure Monitoring Results 1n SIC 3679-F1fteen Inspections (1978-84). Substance No. Insp. in which Sampled Range of Monitored Exposure Acetone Ammonia Asbestos Butyl Cellosolve Cellosolve Acetate Copper Chloride Corrosives Ethyleneimine Fluorides Formaldehyde Hydrochloric Acid (ri Hydrochloric Acid (ta Lead Methylene Chloride Nickel Nitric Acid Sodium Hydroxide Sulfuric Acid To!uene 1,1,1 Trichloroethane Current CAL/O.SHA PFL J ? 2 I 1 1 ?. 1 2 1 se) 1 k) 1 5 2 2 1 1 ?. 1 1 NMa <. 02-10. 43 mg/m™ O.ni fibers/cc image: ------- 5.2.5.3 NIOSH Health Hazard Evaluations (HHE's) NIOSH has to date performed only two HHE's of firms in SIC 3679, one of Sundstrand Data Control in Redmond, Washington (1980), and one of Syntrex Corporation in Eatontown, New Jersey (1981). We reviewed both HHE's for this report, as well as one additional HHE of Western Electric Company in Dublin, California (1973), for which no SIC was specified, but which concerned "printed wiring board processing". Only the Western Electric and Syntrex HHE's are considered here: the Sundstrand HHE was restricted to radio frequency exposure during injection molding of heat sensors on airplane wings, and no hazard was found. Both the General Electric and Syntrex HHE's involved circuit board processing and included both environmental and medical evaluations. The General Electric HHE concerned solvent use in five operations, including testing, lacquer application, mass solder machine operations, and mass solder machine cleaning. Personal breathing zone samples for three substances — n-butyl acetate, toluene, and trichloroethylene — were taken for workers involved in each of the five operations. Exposures to n-butyl acetate and toluene were well below both the 1973 federal standards, and the current CAL/OSHA PEL'S. However, the mean exposures to trichlorethylene for workers in all five operations sampled were above the current CAL/OSHA PEL of 25 parts per million (ppm); and several exposures were measured at two or three times the current CAL/OSHA PEL (though all but one measurement were below the OSHA PEL in effect at the time). Medical interviews of 24 workers disclosed that a high proportion had experienced symptoms consistent with those found in solvent intoxication, including nausea, headache, and dizziness. On the basis of the exposure data and medical evaluations, NIOSH determined that trichloroethylene was having a toxic effect on workers at the. plant at the time of the evaluation. Though the year of the General Electric HHE (1973) casts doubt on its present relevance, the problem of solvents in printed circuit board manufacture was also encountered in the Syntrex HHE (1981). In this HHE, exposures were evaluated for solvents used in vapor degreasing operations, following.automated or hand soldering of printed circuit boards. Monitoring results for the three solvents -- isopropanol, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, and trichlorotrifluoroethane — were all well below the current CAL/OSHA PEL'S. However, medical interviews with nine employees who worked in the degreasing area found that six had symptoms consistent with solvent exposure, including headache, burning eyes, lightheadedness, and upset stomach. Workers with the highest exposure experienced the greatest severity of symptoms. NIOSH also noted that skin absorption is an important route of solvent exposure, and that proper gloves were not always available or used. Though these two HHE's merely represent anecdotal reports of solvent exposure in printed circuit board manufacture, and may not be generally applicable to other establishments, they are instructive in identifying solvent exposure as a potential problem to monitor in this industry. They also illustrate how solvents can cause toxic effects even when monitored air levels of solvent exposure are well within established exposure limits. Indeed, the General Electric exposures to trichloroethylene were entirely acceptable in terms of the PEL in effect thirteen years ago. 5.2.6. Occupational Illness Statistics To evaluate the level of occupational illness in SIC 3679, we reviewed (in addition to -136- image: ------- the anecdotal reports from NIOSH HHE's noted above) California Division of Labor Statistics and Research data from Employer's Reports of Occupational Injury and Illness for 1983 and 1984. These data encompassed the total number of Employer's Reports for "disabling" illnesses (i.e., involving at least one lost workday) in Santa Clara County in 1982 and 1983. Data from the Doctor's First Report database were not reviewed because they are available only by three-digit SICs; the existence of a much larger Santa Clara County industry —SIC 3674, Semiconductor Manufacture — within SIC 367 makes it impossible to characterize SIC 3679 illness from these data. In 1983, there were 72 Santa Clara County Employer's Reports of "disabling" (lost work day) work illnesses in SIC 3679; in 1984, this total was 110. These totals represent 4.8% and 6.9% of the total (non-government) disabling work illnesses reported for the County in 1983 and 1984, respectively. Both percentages are somewhat higher than the proportion of Santa Clara County employment in SIC 3679 as of 1983, which was 3.7%. (Employment figures are from the NIOSH Industrial File, which excludes government agencies; employment figures specific to 1983 and 1984 were not available.) If we compare the proportion of reported disabling work illnesses reported for SIC 3679 for each year (out of the total number of such illnesses in the county) to the proportion of Santa Clara County employment in SIC 3679 (out of total employment for the county), we find that, in 1983, the proportion of work illness reported was 1.3 times greater than the proportion of employment; and in 1984, it was 1.8 times greater. These figures contrast with those for SIC Major Group 36 (electric and electronic equipment) taken as a whole. In 1983, there were 300 disabling work illnesses reported for SIC Major Group 36, or 19.8% of all non-government reports; in 1984, there were 366 disabling work illnesses reported, or 22.9% of the non-government total. These percentages are much closer (1.1 and 1.2 times greater, respectively) to the percentage of total non-government employment in SIC Major Group 36 in Santa Clara County: according to the NIOSH Industrial File, the percentage of Santa Clara County workers in SIC Major Group 36 is 18.4% (117,340 workers out of a total of 638,000). If we convert reported disabling work illnesses and employment totals into rates (of reported disabling work illness per 100 workers), the contrast between SIC 3679 and other industry groups is perhaps clearer. The number of reported disabling work illnesses per 100 workers in the NIOSH Industrial File for SIC 3679 was 0.30 for 1983 and 0.46 for 1984. The rates were higher than those for SIC Major Group 36 taken as a whole, and those for all manufacturing SICs taken as a whole. In fact, the 1984 rate for SIC 3679 was one and one half times greater than that for major Group 36 (0.31 illnesses per 100 workers) and nearly twice that for all manufacturing industries (0.24 per 100 workers). In addition, the rate for SIC 3679 increased substantially from 1983 to 1984,-while the overall manufacturing rate remained relatively stable (0.23 in 1983, 0.24 in 1984). • It is important to note, however, that these rates are suitable for comparison only: they are not necessarily reliable indications of actual illness levels, because 1) they reflect only reported levels of illness, and 2) the employment data used for the denominator is current to March 1983 only, and thus may reflect a different population of firms in any or all of the SIC categories. Nonetheless, the relatively high (and increasing) number of reports of illness in SIC 3679 is a potential indicator that this industry should be further scrutinized. The types of specific health effects well captured by illness reporting systems, such as eye irritations, and acute respiratory effects of toxic inhalations, are also consistent with the types of hazards known to exist in the industry, such as acids and solvents. (Though specific breakdowns of illness totals by type of illness were not obtained for four-digit SICs for -137- image: ------- this report, SIC 367 contributed nearly one-half of all chemical burns reported through the Doctor's First Report system in the county. Unfortunately, as noted, reports from 3679 cannot be differentiated from those of semiconductors or other 367 industries). 5.2.7 Summary and Recommendations This SIC does not rank at all high (bottom 50%) in the IBER system of industry hazard ranking, based on actual exposure levels found by federal OSHA, nor were any overexposures found in the fifteen CAL/OSHA inspection records reviewed. However, the nature of the hazards used, particularly lead compounds, acids, chromium, and solvents, placed it within the top 20% in the OWI rankings, and OSHA inspection data did disclose occasional overexposures to lead, manganese, mercury, and other substances. Moreover, anecdotal evidence from two NIOSH HHE's suggests a potential for toxic solvent exposures related to degreasing operations, and occupational illness data from the Division of Labor Statistics and Research indicate that acute hazards are a significant and continuing source of worker illness in this industry. These indications, combined with the significant contribution of the industry to Santa Clara County employment (over 23,000 workers), make a case for further attention to this industry. Such attention may be especially warranted insofar as the demographic distribution of the industry in favor of small firms (less than 50 workers) makes it difficult for complaint-driven inspections alone to assess adequately the full range of establishments in the industry. Indeed, the fragmented nature of SIC 3679 may recommend it as a worthwhile focus for the County Health Department and local communities through the Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinances. According to administrators of the City of Santa Clara's ordinance, printed circuit board manufacturers presently comprise a large component of the city's registered users'of hazardous materials; this may be the case in other communities as well. Review of hazardous materials storage listings could confirm the nature and quantity of hazardous materials used in given areas by the industry, and suggest further avenues of inquiry. Unlike the semiconductor industry, SIC 3679 (and more specifically, printed circuit board manufacture) uses well understood industrial processes, the proper hazard controls of which are also well understood. These controls include basic appropriate work practices (e.g., ventilation, reasonable workplace, use of gloves), and worker training. Good industrial hygiene in this industry is essentially a matter of applying knowledge and control methods which already exist. -138- image: ------- 5.3 Miscellaneous Plastics Products (STC 3079) 5.3.1 Introduction The plastics industry in Santa Clara County is noteworthy because of its high ranking in the IBER ranks, based on OSHA Inspection Data. SIC 3079 ranks 36th if OSHA hazard weights 7 and 10 (chronic hazards) only are used, and 9th if hazard weights 1, 3, 7 and 10 (acute and chronic hazards) are considered. The industry also has relatively high employment in the county, about 3,000 workers, and encompasses 120 establishments. Of the 3,000 employees, about 1,200 work in firms with less than 50 employees, and about 1,800 in firms with 50 to 250 employees. A glance at a listing of business lines from the NIOSH Industrial File shows that Santa Clara County manufactures a wide variety of plastics, from house planters, kitchenware and plastic bottles to tubing, pipes, insulation products, etc. 5.3.2 Materials and Processes Plastics manufacturing involves an immense number of chemical compounds and a large number of processes. Some generalizations about both materials and processes, and their hazards, can be made however. Plastics are fundamentally manufactured from two components: polymers, which are often referred to as "resin" when they are part of the starting mixture, and additives, which contribute to the structure, flexibility, color, fire resistance, etc., of the product. Polymers are long chains of smaller -compounds, called monomers. While a wide variety of polymers are used in the plastics industry, 75% of total plastics consumption in the world consists of the "basic" plastics, polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride, polystyrene and polypropylene. (Jarvisalo, pp. 4-5) Other plastics include acrylics, fluorocarbon polymers, polyurethanes, phenol-formaldehyde resins, unsaturated polyesters, epoxy resins, and aminoplasts. As with polymers, the additives in plastics manufacturing represent a huge array of chemical compounds, which, however, can be roughly grouped in the following categories: plasticizers; flame retardants; heat stabilizers; antioxidants; ultraviolet light absorbers; blowing agents; initiators; lubricants and flow control agents; antistatic agents; curing agents; colorants; fillers and reinforcements; solvents; and optical brighteners. The processes that may be encountered in a plastics factory range from materials handling to the molding operations that produce the individual unit to the machining of the finished product. Materials handling includes bulk storage, manual handling of fiber boxes, drums and bags, and the conveying, proportioning and blending, and drying of resin and other tasks necessary to deliver the resin and other materials to the production areas. The resin commonly comes in the form of a powder or pellets, and is mixed with the necessary additives prior to the molding. Molding operations usually fall into one of three general categories or a variation thereof: injection molding, compression molding, or extrusion molding. Most plastic products are created through injection molding, where the polymer is preheated in a separate chamber and then forced into a closed mold by a high pressure hydraulic plunger. In compression molding, resin powder is placed directly in a closed mold, where heat and pressure cause it to take the shape of the mold. Extrusion molding represents a method for creating a continuous product, such as tubing, rods, sheeting, film, etc. Here the polymer is conveyed continuously along a screw through regions of high temperature and pressure, where it is melted and compacted, and forced through a die that* shapes the final product. Other processing methods include casting, whereby molten plastic is poured into an open or closed mold and allowed to set; -139- image: ------- lamination, where multiple layers of resin and filler are combined for the final product; and foam production whereby gas is generated in a fluid polymer to a spongy texture. Following the cooling of the mold the plastic units may be sprayed with paint or other chemical compounds, machined or polished, or cut up into individual pieces or wound onto- reels in the case of extrusion mold products. 5.3.3 Occupational Hazards In terms of occupational hazards, the polymers used in plastics manufacture are considered to be inert and non-toxic. The more serious potential hazards reside in the toxicity of low molecular size substances such as heat degradation products and the additives mixed with the resins. Specific health hazards depend on the material and process used in this industry, but some general problems can be outlined. A historical problem which today's technology has greatly minimized is the potential exposure to residual monomer vapor or volatiles released during the processing of the polymers. Many monomers that can be polymerized in resin formation can be converted to epoxides by the mammalian mixed-function oxidase system. These epoxides or their reactive metabolites can disrupt cellular structure and function and thus be a possible cause of carcinogenesis. Epoxides of ethylene, styrene and vinyl chloride have been shown to be carcinogenic in animal studies and mutagenic in bacterial tests. A similar potential hazard is the toxicity of thermal decomposition products. This should be a significant concern in plastics fabrication only if processing temperatures, through equipment failure .or malfunction, exceed the normal recommended range by a large margin. Carbon, carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide are common decomposition products in most polymers. In addition, depending on the material, temperature and amount of oxygen present, other toxic gases can be released. These include hydrogen cyanide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, various fluorinated gases, acrylic acid, formaldehyde, crotonaldehyde, etc. Furthermore, flame-retardant chemical modifiers common in molding formulations can release toxic and corrosive gases at temperatures over 475 F. In addition to monomers, additives represent a serious potential health hazard in the plastics industry. Some typical examples will illustrate this danger. Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP), one of the most important plasticizers used today, has been shown to be a carcinogen and teratogen in animal studies and a mutagen in bacterial bioassays. In 1980 NIOSH estimated about 625,000 U.S. workers were potentially exposed to DEHP. (Jarvisalo, p. 118) The major industries with the greatest exposure were plastics and rubber plants. Heat stabilizers pose another potential hazard among additives. Major heat stabilizers include barium-cadmium, organotins, lead, calcium-zinc, and antimony. A number of studies have been done on organotin and lead stabilizers. Trialkyl tin compounds were found to affect the central nervous system, while dialkyl tin compounds produced bile duct lesions in animal studies. In general, diorganotins were found to have genotoxic effects in vitro and reproductive anomalies in animals. Lead stabilizers account for about 60% of total stabilizer consumption. While acute lead poisoning has been extremely unlikely with modern technology, the subtle health effects of low level chronic exposure continue to be a concern of occupational health. -140- image: ------- Blowing agents, widely used in the preparation of foamed plastics, are designed to decompose completely in the plastics processing, but it is not certain that they do. Azobis isobutyronitrile, a prominently employed thermally labile blowing agent, has been found to produce liver and kidney lesions in animal studies. Azodicarbonamide, another blowing agent, is currently being tested for carcinogenicity by the National Toxicology Program. Free radical initiators, used to initiate the polymerization of monomers, include a broad spectrum of peroxides and peroxy compounds. Animal studies have indicated tumor-promoting ability in benzoyl peroxide, and bacterial tests have shown mutagenic properties in a number of organic peroxides. What becomes apparent in considering the health effects of the additives used in the plastics industry is the paucity of toxicity data and the lack of sufficient epidemiological studies for the majority of these compounds. Nuisance dust, generated in the handling of bulk polymers in powder form (or less so in pellet form), in the regrinding of scrap plastics for recycling, and from a variety of additives, can also present a health hazard. Specific occupational exposure limits do not exist for most of these particulates and thus they must be evaluated primarily as nuisance dust. Exposure to some resin systems has been associated with another common occupational health problem, dermatitis. This can result from primary irritants, such as solvents, or sensitizing agents such as formaldehyde, isocyanates and organic amines. 5.3.4 Potential Exposures Data In terms of potential exposures the plastics industry ranked 87 out of 412 industries, or in the top 25th percentile, in the NIOSH IRI rankings based on the NOHS survey. The OSHA Weighted Index, on the other hand, placed plastics in the 286th rank out of 549 industries ranked, or in the top 50th percentile -indicating a much lower hazard potential than the IRI ranking. It is interesting to note that both the OWI and IRI systems ranked SIC 3079 considerably less hazardous than the HESIS IBER ranking (9, as mentioned in the opening paragraph), which is based on actual rather than potential exposures, i.e. OSHA inspection data. Potential exposures in the plastics industry are also indicated by OSHA's listing of substances by individual weighted indices in an industry, from which the industry OWI •rank is derived. Table 5.3-1 shows the top 80 substances out of a total of 419 evaluated for SIC 3079, for which 130 firms employing 16,905 workers were surveyed. In this case a high weighted index indicates high potential exposure, either because of large numbers of full-time worker exposures or highly hazardous substances or both. 5.3.5 Actual Exposures Data 5.3.S.I Federal OSHA OSHA inspection files for the years 1979 to 1982 provide data on actual exposures in the plastics industry. A total of 220 inspections were conducted for SIC 3079, with 13'87 samples taken, for 104 substances. Table 5.3-2 lists the substances with at least one sample over 50% of the PEL. All of these substances except for four had samples with values -141- image: ------- Table 5.3-1 OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION MISC. PLASTICS PRODUCTS (SIC 3079) DESCRIPTION —-NQHS SURVEYED--- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 16.905 130 IIIFOM CODE 2037 0527 9050 2460 2590 9090 1290 2135 2229 1018 5010 2532 2040 0290 1720 C0320 9030 0874 2490 0490 0760 2000 0686 2540 1591 1010 9210 2170 1660 0570 1779 1913 0490 0490 C9020 50'10 9010 0527 1591 0374 0230 NOHS CODE M2829 80243 84055 73300 76720 17366 33640 80221 M1463 M0347 52138 82880 55460 90320 46970 09070 71055 24130 73790 83628 20380 M0600 81876 74990 83453 25145 94220 M0256 45930 17490 48535 32385- M2267 15570 90310 52131 M1806 M0647 42490 80517 07310 1.1.1- PETROLEUM SPIRITS CARBON SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED TOLUENE XYLENE GRAPHITE FORMALDEHYDE ETHYLENE, TETRAFLUORO-. POLYMER IRON OXIDE, RED ETHYLHEXYl) PHTHALATE, BISC2- OIL. LUBE PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER PHENOL ASPHALT TRICHLOROETHANE, BENZENE TALC DICIILOROETHANE, 1.2- ETHYLENE. TRICHLORO- CADMIUM SULFIDE CRESOL PARAFFIN CHROMIC ACID, LEADC2+) SALT ( TURPENTINE LEAD NAPHTHENATE DIOXANE, 1,4- WOODS PROPANOL. 1- METHANOL CARBON TETRACHLORIDE MICA ETHYLENE GLYCOL C.I. 77196-PIGMENT ORANGE 20 CADMIUM ASBESTOS OIL. CUTTING SILICA FLOUR C.I. 77266-PIGMENT BLACK 7 LEAD SODIUM BORATE ANTInOHY EXPOSURE FACTOR 3.719 2,001 2,353 2,255 2.064 2,019 1.273 ,785 .778 ,227 .209 ,623 ,087 .056 ,484 .006 ,419 979 1.394 872 811 784 763 1.070 750 723 723 700 965 671 952 663 658 650 644 639 910 633 628 868 603 EXPOSURE INDEX .219 .118 .139 .133 .122 .119 .075 .105 .105 .072 .071 .096 .064 .062 .087 .059 .083 .057 .082 .051 .047 .046 .045 .063 .044 .042 .042 .041 .057 .039 .056 .039 .038 .038 .038 .037 .053 .037 .037 .051 .035 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 07 07 07 07 10 07 07 10 10 07 10 10 07 10 07 10 07 10 10 10 10 07 10 10 10 10 07 10 07 10 10 10 10 10 07 10 10 07 10 UEICHTED INDEX 2.199 1.183 .974 .933 .854 .836 .753 .739 .736 .725 .715 .672 .643 .624 .614 .595 .587 .579 .577 .515 .479 .463 .451 .443 .443 .427 .427 .414 .399 .396 .394 .392 .389 .384 .380 .377 .376 .374 .371 .359 .356 image: ------- C INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 79 MISC. PLASTICS PRODUCTS OCCUPATIONAL 5AFFTY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 16,905 130 IHFOM CODE 0230 1060 1941 1190 2020 1060 0686 1520 1591 0220 1631 0490 1560 0160 2620 1&60 1591 0867 1520 0490 2037 0540 0933 0860 1520 0590 C0260 0830 1536 1620 2540 0490 0020 0871 1620 2611 0490 1591 0686 NOUS CODE A1433 31500 51090 32550 54790 M0238 M1499 40297 83062 06580 M1643 M1507 40987 20265 M0626 50742 84546 24003 70131 83718 M0630 17370 81806 M4016 80990 46240 07555 21660 40430 44030 M1322 M2270 01568 24095 81664 77150 15630 42685 M0926 DESCRIPTION ANTIMONY SULFIDE ETHYL ALCOHOL NITROPROPANE, 2- ETHYLEHE OXIDE TETRACHLOROETHYLENE ALCOHOL CHROME GREEN IRON OXIDES LEAD SULFATE, TRIBASIC ANILINE MERCURY SULFIDE CADMIUM LITMOPONE SELENIDE ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL ALUMINUM OXIDE ZIRCONIUM OXIDE NITRIC ACID LEAD SULFATE DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHO- IRON OXIDE (FE304) CADMIUM SELENIDE NAPHTHA-SOLVENT CARBON DISULFIDE DIETIIYL PHTHALATE PENTANONE. 4-HYDROXY-4-METHYL-, IRON OXIDE. YELLOW METHOXYETHANOL, 2- ARSENIC OXIDES CYCLOHEXANONE ISODUTYL ALCOHOL MANGANESE DIOXIDE TURPENTINE (GUM) C.I. 77199-PIGMENT ORANGE 20 ACETIC ACID DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE MANGANESE OXIDE ZINC CHLORIDE CADMIUM OXIDES LEAD OXIDES C.I. 77600-PIGMENT YELLOW 34 2- EXPOSURE^ FACTOR 585 1,934 569 509 728 1.677 501 696 488 687 463 460 4,558 1,454 610 416 416 413 591 413 378 378 1,249 1,211 504 490 340 1,129 336 455 454 317 428 2.918 413 272 270 266 260 EXPOSURE INDEX .034 .114 .033 .030 .043 .099 .029 .041 .028 .040 .027 • .027 .269 .086 .036 .024 .024 .024 .034 .024 .022 .022 .073 .071 .029 .028 .020 .066 .019 .026 .026 .018 .025 .172 .024 .016 .015 .015 .015 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 03 10 10 07 03 10 07 10 07 10 10 01 03 07 10 10 10 07 10 10 10 03 03 07 07 10 03 10 07 07 10 07 01 07 10 10 10 10 WEIGHTED INDEX .346 .343 .336 .301 .301 .297 .296 .288 .288 .284 .273 .272 .269 .258 .252 .246 .246 .244 .244 .244 .223 .223 .221 .214 .208 .202 .201 .200 .198 .188 .187 .187 .177 .172 .171 .160 . 159 .157 .153 419 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3079 OTHER TOTALS: 138,212 8.004 42.647 image: ------- Table 5.3-2 Federal OSHA Inspection Data for SIC 3079: Substances with Sampled Exposures at or above 50% of the OSHA PEL Substance lead arsenate lead. Inorganic fumes & dust methylene chloride methyl methacrylate phenol styrene monomer toluene toluene-?, 4-di isocyanate (TPI) trichloro-1,2,2 trifluoroethane.1,1,2 vinyl chloride 4, 4 '-methylene bis (2, chloroaniline) (MOCA) silica asbestos antimony 2-butanone (MEK) cadnium dust carbon disulfide chronic acid & chromates methylene bisphenyl di isocyanate (Mm) hexanone nuisance dust total dust No of Inspec 12 21 14 2 4 45 30 19 1 13 3 6 15 6 37 9 2 2 15 fi 31 ?2 No of Samples 22 66 25 5 in 209 73 65 4 28 12 a 26 13 124 42 14 5 33 28 66 41 Mean Proptn of PEL 1.16 1.93 0.07 0.41 2.54 0.53 0.11 0.60 0.67 0.02 • 4.85 0.07 0.07 0.37 0.16 0.13 0.67 0.62 0.12 0.34 0.84 1.26 Max Proptn of PEL 16.50 52.80 0.57 1.21 10.00 2.47 1.19 19.97 0.93 0.64 31.15 0.63 0.96 1.51 2.99 2.10 3.60 1.94 3.50 1.70 11.71 36.20 No Insp w/ some Snip > PEL 2 10 0 1 1 19 1 4 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 6 6 Number Insp w/ Mean > PEL 2 9 0 0 1 8 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 5 6 No of Samples Ovr PEL 4 23 0 1 1 47 2 9 0 0 3 0 0 1 4 1 3 2 1 2 8 8 Source: OSHA MIS 1979-82. image: ------- exceeding the PEL. Two exposures were for monomers, vinyl chloride and styrene, while the rest appear to be mainly from additives, including solvents. Particularly large numbers of overexposures should be noted for lead, styrene, and particulates (consisting of nuisance dust and total dust). 5.3.5.2 CAL/OSHA Inspection Data CAL/OSHA data for SIC 3079 was limited for Santa Clara County. Between 1981 and 1983, CAL/OSHA inspection files show one facility inspected to investigate exposures of cyclohexanone and MEK. Breathing zone samples found no exposures over the PEL. 5.3.5.3 NIOSH Health Hazard Evaluations NIOSH Health Hazard Evaluations (HHE's), are another source of data on actual and potential exposures in the industry. Fifteen HHE's conducted for the plastics industry (SIC 3079) between 1978 and 1984 were reviewed. Specific concerns expressed by employers or employees requesting the HHE dealt with skin contact with polymer pellets and dust and colorants, inhalation of gases in molding areas, exposures to heavy metals, ketones, acrylic resins, azodicarbamide, and polyethylene dust, and associations between exposures and breast and cervical cancer, and Hodgkins disease. Common medical complaints included headaches, nausea, lightheadedness, eyes, nose and throat and upper respiratory irritation, labored breathing, chest pain, and dyspnea. NIOSH sampled a wide variety of substances including solvents, heavy metals, monomers and polymer dust, heat degradation volatiles, and miscellaneous particulates. Actual overexposures were found in only 3 HHE's: these included overexposures to organotin, a heat stabilizing agent (samples taken near extruder based in blow molding process); cadmium, a coloring additive (samples taken in set up area of injection molding department); carbon monoxide, a heat degradation product (high exposures found in several departments); methylene chloride, a solvent (samples taken in foam production area); and styrene, a monomer (samples taken near a molding operation). In a few instances, even though no environmental samples exceeded NIOSH or OSHA criteria, medical tests including pulmonary function tests and the radioallergosorbent technique (RAST) indicated overexposures to two potentially sensitizing agents, toluene-2,2-diisocyanate (TDI) and hexahydrophthalic anhydride (HHPA). TDI is used as a foaming agent while HHPA is a curing agent for epoxy resins. Although there were few overexposures in the HHE's exposure monitoring, concern was expressed for the synergistic effects of the various chemical exposures. 5.3.6 Occupational Illness Statistics To assess occupational illness in SIC 3079 in Santa Clara County, we reviewed the Employer's Reports and Doctor's First Reports of occupational injury and illness databases maintained by the Division of Labor Statistics and Research (DLSR). We obtained Santa Clara County data from DLSR from both systems for the years 1982-84. Problems encountered using Doctor's First Reports data for other SIC's profiled, due to the unavailability of 4-digit SIC tabulations, did not exist in this SIC because 3079 is the only 4-digit SIC in SIC 307. Very few Employer's Reports of occupational illness were generated by SIC 3079 in the years 1982-84 in the county: in 1982, there were none at all; in 1983, there were six; and in 1984, there were twelve. These figures represent "disabling" illnesses, i.e., -145- image: ------- those which caused at least one lost work day. The 1984 figure represents about 0.07% of all 1984 Santa Clara County Employer's Reports for disabling occupational illness. Doctor's First Reports for the county were filed for SIC 3079 workers as follows: sixteen reports were filed in 1982, the same number in 1983, and 22 in 1984. (These figures all refer to occupational illness only, and do not distinguish between cases which involved lost work days and those which did not.) The Doctor's First Report data obtained from DLSR also showed detailed breakdowns of illness type for this SIC. The reports filed were almost entirely for skin or eye conditions, or chemical burns; in 1984 there were also two cases of systemic poisoning. The 22 reports in 1984 represented about 0.9% of all reports filed in the county for that year (2,552), and about 1.8% of all reports in manufacturing industries for that year (1,239). References Jarvisalo, Jorma, Pirkko Pfaffli and Harri Vainio, Industrial Hazards of Plastics and Synthetic Elastomers. Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York, 1984. Mutchler, John E. and Kenneth G. Proskie, "Plastics Processing Operations", Ch. 16 in Industrial Hveiene Aspects of Plant Operations. Lewis J. Cralley and Lester V. Cralley (eds.), Macmillan Publishing Co., New York, 1984. -146- image: ------- 5.4 Electroplating (SIC 3471) 5.4.1 Demographics In Santa Clara County, 1,034 workers are employed in electroplating facilities. Approximately 60% work in shops employing less than 50 workers. The remaining 40% are employed by a single electronics company. 5.4.2 Materials and Processes Metal, plastic and rubber parts are plated to prevent rusting and corrosion, for the sake of appearance, to reduce electrical contact operations, and to improve wearability. Electroplating is the process of applying a metal coating through the action of an electric current. The complete process includes physical pretreatment steps where the pieces are worked and formed and subsequently chemically treated to remove any contamination from the metal surface. The fundamental electroplating process is quite simple and standardized varying essentially only with the plating solution and base metal to be plated. The common plating metals include cadmium, chromium, copper, gold, nickel, silver and their alloys. Degreasing solvents, such as trichloroethylene, perchloroethylene, methyl chloroform and freons are used in the chemical pretreatment steps. Acids, alkalies and cyanide solutions are used extensively. Local exhaust ventilation is the principle control measure for this industry. Other controls include additives to reduce surface tension and suppress misting in the tanks; where possible tanks are provided with covers. Protective aprons and gloves are generally supplied by the employers. 5.4.3 Potential Exposures The National Occupational Hazard Survey (NOHS) (1974) provided extent-of-exposure data upon which both OSHA and NIOSH have developed systems for ranking industries by degree of associated potential hazard (Section 4). According to the Industrial Risk Index (IRI), electroplating (SIC 3471) ranks 123, out of 412 industries ranked. According to the OSHA Weighted Index (OWI), electroplating ranks 76 out of 549 industries, placing it within the top 20% of the industries ranked using this system. In developing the OWI ranking, OSHA rated the 257 substances in 23 facilities employing 771 workers which were identified in the NOHS. The top eighty greatest potential hazards used in electroplating as identified by OWI are shown in Table 5.4-1. As can be seen, substances with the greatest potential risk in this industry include acids, silica, asbestos, and hydrogen fluoride. 5.4.4 Actual Exposures 5.4.4.1 Federal OSHA Inspection Data Data from OSHA inspections based on actual exposures were reviewed for the years 1979-82. Eighty-four inspections were conducted in SIC 3471, during which 509 samples were taken for 51 substances. Nineteen samples from nine substances were over the PEL. Table 5.4-2 is a listing of substances sampled by OSHA with monitored levels higher than -147- image: ------- Table 5.4-1 OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS PLATING AND POLISHING (SIC 3471) DESCRIPTION 771 23 IHFOM I CODE 1860 0686 2310 1430 9050 2229 2037 2620 1520 1840 0160 2432 9010 2537 MC9020 ** CO I 1840 1460 0790 0490 0374 1591 1840 0686 0170 0790 0020 2460 1591 1840 0790 0790 1842 1018 2240 0230 0230 2040 0290 2490 2590 2000 NOHS CODE 50742 19360 70870 38580 84055 M1463 M2829 M0626 40297 50510 20265 73253 M1806 80230 90310 81906 38550 68950 15630 80517 42490 81904 90570 05250 60400 01568 73300 M0751 50440 80720 M0052 50495 M0347 M0105 A1433 07310 55460 90320 73790 76720 110600 NITRIC ACID CHROMIC ACID SULFURIC ACID HYDROGEN CHLORIDE SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED IRON OXIDE, RED PETROLEUM SPIRITS ZIRCONIUM OXIDE IRON OXIDES NICKEL SULFATE ALUMINUM OXIDE TIN OXIDES SILICA FLOUR TUNGSTEN CARBIDE ASBESTOS NICKEL ACETATE HYDROGEN FLUORIDE SODIUM CYANIDE CADMIUM OXIDES SODIUM BORATE LEAD NICKEL SALTS CHROMOUS SALTS A111 IONIA POTASSIUM CYANIDE ACETIC ACID TOLUENE LEADED ZINC OXIDE NICKEL CHLORIDE ZItIC CYANIDE INORGANIC CYANIDES NICKEL OXIDES ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BISC2- INORGANIC SILVER COMPOUNDS ANTIMONY SULFIDE ANTIMONY PHEHOL ASPHALT ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO- XYLEUE PARAFFIN EXPOSURE FACTOR 257 241 329 275 251 241 153 217 193 134 411 173 166 166 112 100 96 136 90 128 87 87 87 120 115 114 114 75 70 97 96 66 61 87 57 57 53 52 74 73 49 EXPOSURE INDEX .333 .312 .426 .356 .325 .312 .198 .281 .250 .173 .533 .224 .215 .215 .145 .129 .124 .176 .116 .166 .112 .112 .112 .155 .149 .147 .147 .097 .090 .125 .124 .085 .079 .112 .073 .073 .068 .067 .095 .094 .063 HAZARD WEIGHTED WEIGHT INDEX 10 3.333 10 3.125 07 2.987 07 2.496 07 2.278 07 2.188 10 07 07 10 03 07 07 07 10 10 10 07 10 07 10 10 10 07 07 07 07 .984 .970 .752 .738 .599 .570 .507 .507 .452 .297 .245 .234 .167 .162 .128 .128 .128 .089 .044 .035 .035 10 .972 10 .907 07 .880 07 .871 10 .856 10 .791 07 .789 10 .739 10 .739 10 .687 10 .674 07 .671 07 .662 10 .635 image: ------- Z3 CZZ) OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOUS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS .1C INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 1471 PLATING AND POLISHING ---NOHS EMPLOYMENT 771 SURVEYED --- FIRMS IHFOM CODE 1536 1631 C0320 0570 0874 1842 0490 2537 0686 0760 1290 0790 0360 1591 2260 1720 1660 2080 2420 2085 2611 0527 2170 1842 0560 0735 1620 0490 0490 0490 0490 0490 0490 0490 0490 2570 1060 1591 9090 NOHS CODE 40430 45315 09070 17490 24130 50420 82783 A1003 80064 20380 33640 81950 11855 42685 69070 46970 45930 57740 72085 58520 77150 80243 MO 2 56 82846 17460 94040 44035 80247 81748 81749 83005 83628 83718 84157 84478 A1010 315CO M0125 17366 DESCRIPTION ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL MERCURY OXIDES BENZENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE DICHLOROETIIANE, 1,2- NICKEL CADMIUM CYANIDE TUNGSTEN OXIDES POTASSIUM DICIIROMATE(VI) CRESOL FORMALDEHYDE GOLD POTASSIUM CYANIDE BERYLLIUM OXIDES LEAD OXIDES SODIUM HYDROXIDE TRICHLOROETHANE, 1,1,1- METHANOL PH05PHINE THALLIUM OXIDES PHOSPHORIC ACID ZINC CHLORIDE CARBON PROPANOL. 1- NICKEL CYANIDE CARBON MONOXIDE COTTON MANGANESE OXIDES CADMIUM SULFATE CADMIUM IODIDE CADMIUM NITRATE CADMIUM TELLURIDE CADMIUM SULFIDE CADMIUM SELENIDE CADMIUM PHOSPHATE CADMIUM CHLORIDE VANADIUM OXIDES ETHYL ALCOHOL LEAD MONOXIDE GRAPHITE EXPOSURE FACTOR 49 46 45 45 45 45 45 63 43 42 42 57 38 38 376 51 50 35 35 332 32 32 30 30 41 . 41 38 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 35 75 21 30 EXPOSURE INDEX .063 .059 .058 .058 .058 .058 .058 .081 .055 .054 .054 .073 .049 .049 .487 .066 .064 .045 .045 .430 .041 .041 .038 .038 .053 .053 .049 .032 .032 .032 .032 .032 .032 .032 .032 .045 .097 .027 .038 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 10 10 10 07 10 10 01 07 07 10 10 01 10 10 10 10 07 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 03 10 07 WEIGHTEI INDEX .635 .596 .583 .583 .583 .583 .583 .571 .557 .544 .544 .517 .492 .492 .487 .463 .453 .453 .453 .430 .415 .415 .389 .389 .372 .372 .345 .324 .324 .324 .324 .324 .324 .324 .324 .317 .291 .272 .272 257 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3471 OTHER TOTALS: 11.089 14.244 86.252 image: ------- Table 5.4-2 Federal OSHA Inspection Data for SIC 3471: Substances with Sampled Exposure at or above 50% of the OSHA PEL 1 t-> en 0 1 Substance Chromates ' Chromic acid Copper Hydrogen chloride Lead arsenate Inorg. manganates Methylene chloride Nickel (soluble) Nickel , metal Sulfurlc acid Trichloroethylene Silica Dust No of Inspec 24 23 11 12 7 2 2 15 7 18 9 5 ?. No of Samples 51 51 24 27 12 4 4 29 13 45 Ifi 13 7 Mean Proptn of PEL n.05 . 0.09 0.09 0.13 1.01 0.70 0.51 0.04 0.14 0.07 0.7fi 2.45 2.3R Max Proptn of PFL 1.10 0.86 1.70 1.23 11.40 2.80 1.33 0.89 0.73 0.96 2.18 14.10 12.80 No Insp w/ some Smp > PEL 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 3 3 1 Number Insp w/ Mean > PEL 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 No of Samples Ovr PEL 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 6 4 2 image: ------- 50% of the PEL. All aspects of the electroplating process produce potentially hazardous substances with monitored exposures greater than 50% of the PEL: pretreatment generates silica, dusts, solvents; plating exposes workers to oxides and metals. An Inspection Based Exposure Ranking (IBER) scheme was developed (Section 4) from the OSHA inspection data. SIC 3471, plating and polishing, has an IBER of 98 out of 475 industries ranked, placing it just outside the top 20% of IBER hazardous industries. 5.4.4.2 CAL/OSHA Inspection Data, 1981-83 Cal/OSHA inspection files from 1981-1983 contain inspection data from two electroplating firms in Santa Clara County. Acids and caustics used in the pretreatment process, sodium cyanide and chromium in the plating solutions, and nitrogen dioxide and hydrogen chloride gases were the potential exposure hazards, but no monitoring for these substances was performed. 5.4.4.3 NIOSH Health Hazard Evaluations Four Health Hazard Evaluations (HHEs) performed by NIOSH in the years 1980-84 were examined for examples of the types of exposures and health effects occurring in this industry. They were found to have exposure levels within the acceptable limits. Recommendations were made, however, for reducing exposures to chromium and sulfuric acid through such methods as the use of protective clothing and work practice improvements, monitoring and/or upgrading of existing local exhaust ventilation systems, and the institution of comprehensive safety and health programs. 5.4.5 Occupational Illness Statistics Information available from the California Division of Labor Statistics and Research (DLSR) were reviewed for 1983 and 1984 to assess reported occupational illness in SIC 3471. Data from Employer's First Reports for "disabling" illnesses (resulting in at least one lost work day) show that for 1983 there were 8 disabling illnesses reported for SIC 3471 out of 1599 non-government agency reports in the county; in 1984 there were also 8 disabling illnesses reported out of 1599 non-government agency reports. These cases represent 0.62% and 0.57% respectively of the total reports for the county. Another way to analyze them is to say that electroplating, which employs 1,034 in Santa Clara County out of the total employment of 648,000, accounts for approximately 0.16% of the county's total employment. Proportionally there are 3 1/2 times the reports of occupational disease for this SIC than would be expected for the number employed in the county for this industry. We obtained data from DLSR showing types of illness represented by Employer's Reports for 1984, but only for the 3-digit SIC 347. Illness types included dermatitis, lower respiratory conditions, and- diseases of the eye other than conjunctivitis, with eye diseases being the major type. Doctor's First Reports of Occupational Injury and Illness contain reports of those cases which the physician felt were work related. Only 3-digit SIC breakdowns are available for this database. SIC 347 contains data on coating and engraving as well as -151- image: ------- electroplating. In 1983 there were 37 total reports in Santa Clara County for SIC 347. Eye conditions, chemical burns, skin conditions and systemic poisonings were the major health effects of these industries. In 1984, there were 36 total reports with the same profile, eye conditions accounting for half the diseases reported. -152- image: ------- 5.5 General Medical and Surgical Hospitals (STC 8062) 5.5.1 Introduction One of the largest employers in Santa Clara County is the hospital industry. (While the 3-digit SIC 806 covers all hospitals, this profile addresses SIC 8062 alone, as this specific SIC is the large employer in Santa Clara County. When we refer to hospitals or the hospital industry, we are referring to SIC 8062.) Eleven hospitals employ about 14,000 people, with employment in individual establishments ranging from 100 to 2,000 personnel. Although hospital employees are susceptible to potentially serious physical, chemical and biological occupational hazards, many hospitals, like universities and research labs, lack the programs and professionals to assess the work environment risk and institute protective measures. 5.5.2 Occupational Hazards Physical hazards include electrical hazards, slippery floors, noise, heat, poor lighting and inadequate ventilation.' The best documented problems are accidents, which frequently occur while handling patients or equipment. A major hazard to hospital employees is the use of toxic chemicals, especially inhalation anesthetics, sterilants and anticancer drugs. The most common inhalation anesthetics are nitrous oxide, halothane, and methoxyflurane. While low level exposure health effects are still controversial, the best documented hazard is to the reproductive system, with a correlation between exposed women and spontaneous abortions. Other health risks include mutagenicity and carcinogenicity, liver disease, and renal damage, as indicated by animal studies and limited epidemiological evidence. The narcotizing and immune depressant effects of anesthetic agents have also been studied. Measures to control exposures should include possible substitution of less toxic agents, better scavenging and ventilation systems, and improved employee practices with respect to equipment usage. Two sterilants commonly used are ethylene oxide and formaldehyde. Ethylene oxide is a powerful alkyiating agent used for sterilizing equipment and materials in hospitals that cannot be subjected to high temperatures. The hazards lie in both acute and chronic exposure, which can cause respiratory tract irritation, central nervous system effects, gastrointestinal symptoms and chemical burns. Animal studies also suggest increased rates of leukemia, sister chromatid exchange, and reproductive problems including teratogenesis and spontaneous abortion. A recent OSHA standard requires a PEL of 1 ppm, detailed industrial hygiene monitoring and medical surveillance. Employee education and training, restricted areas, and the use of engineering controls are also mandated by this standard. In April, 1984, CAL/OSHA did a special studies report on this toxic sterilant, which covers its use, sampling methods, and applicable CAL/OSHA regulations. Currently the CAL/OSHA PEL for ethylene oxide is the same as the federal standard of 1 ppm. In California it is regulated as a carcinogen. Formaldehyde is another sterilant which is also used as aqueous solution in pathology labs. Most common exposures come from autopsy rooms and renal dialysis units, in addition to pathology labs. Levels of less than 1 ppm can cause irritation of skin, eyes, nose, throat and lungs. Immunogenic responses include asthma and dermatitis. A serious concern suggested by animal studies is the mutagenic and carcinogenic potential of chronic low level exposure to this agent. IARC has determined that formaldehyde should be -153- image: ------- treated as a potential human carcinogen; neither federal OSHA nor CAL/OSHA currently regulate formaldehyde as a carcinogen. Anticancer drugs include alkylating agents, antimetabolites, antibiotics and hormones. Occupational exposure studies have shown detectable air levels of these drugs in hospital units with no hoods, where nurses often prepare doses. In addition to being irritants to skin, eyes, mucous membranes and other tissues, these chemical agents are potential mutagens and carcinogens, as well as possibly hepatotoxic. The clinical toxicity, through case studies of patients to whom the drugs have been administered, animal studies and chromosome damage assessment has been well established, but there is little information available on the occupational health effects of handling these drugs. A recent concern is the reproductive effect of these drugs. The New England Journal of Medicine recently published a paper suggesting a "statistically significant association between fetal loss and occupational exposure to neoplastic drugs during the first trimester of pregnancy."1 In preparing doses of anticancer drugs, hospital personnel should use fume cabinets and wear protective gloves and face masks. Other hospital employee hazards include radiation, infectious diseases and stress factors. Although many hospital workers are exposed to radiation, the exposure is often undetectable and'there is controversy over assessment of biological risks from chronic low doses. Infectious disease risk is an obvious hazard, but can be lowered by enforcing several practices: vaccination against infectious agents where possible; following proper isolation procedures; washing hands after contact with patients; and proper handling of potentially infectious blood and secretions. Stress hazards stem from having to make critical decisions under pressure, emotional factors and unsettling work schedules. 5.5.3 Exposure Data Examples of actual overexposures to toxic chemicals in the hospital work environment can be found in federal OSHA and CAL/OSHA inspection files. Between the years 1979 and 1982 federal OSHA conducted 26 inspections of hospitals and took 128 samples. Five chemicals were found to have overexposures: chloroform, ethrane, formaldehyde, nitrous oxide and xylene. One test sample out of 4 was over the PEL for chloroform while the maximum level monitored was almost twice the PEL. Ethrane, an inhalation anesthetic, had five samples out of 17 over the PEL, with its maximum sample four times the PEL. Formaldehyde had 17 samples taken, of which six were over the PEL and the highest sample 5.7 times the PEL. For nitrous oxide there was only one inspection, for which four samples were take - all four were over the PEL, while the highest sample exceeded the PEL by a factor of ten. Xylene exceeded the PEL in only one sample out of a total of 16, with a maximum level at 1.45 times the PEL. Potential exposures in hospitals are indicated by OSHA's listing of substances by individual weighted indices in an industry, from which the industry OWI rank is derived (discussed in section 4). Only a 3-digit listing was available covering all hospitals; therefore psychiatric and other specialty hospitals are included in this listing. Table 5.5-1 shows the top 80 substances out of a total of 444 evaluated for SIC 806, for which 43 facilities with a combined employment of 21,955 were surveyed. The resulting OWI rank for hospitals was 248 out of 549 industries, or in the top 50th percentile. Using CAL/OSHA inspection files we looked at 12 inspections covering five Santa Clara hospitals. There were two instances of overexposures, both at the same facility for the same substance, formaldehyde. The overexposures occurred in the histology lab and -154- image: ------- INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION HOSPITALS (SIC 8060) OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 21,955 43 IHFOM CODE 1290 0867 1060 0868 0374 1591 2037 0020 1369 1190 1430 0170 1913 I 1720 |t C0320 S UIO I 0570 1660 2000 1060 2490 0874 2460 2590 2540 0760 2170 2020 9030 2037 0540 2040 1560 9050 9090 1970 2611 0220 2510 0522 0670 NOHS CODE 33640 24003 31500 24006 80517 M1693 M2829 01568 35960 A1719 38580 05250 32385 46970 09070 33720 17490 45930 M0600 M0238 73790 24130 73300 76720 74990 20380 M0256 54790 71055 M0630 17370 55460 40987 84055 17366 52480 77150 06580 70870 15800 18500 DESCRIPTION FORMALDEHYDE DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHO- ETHYL ALCOHOL DICHLOROBENZENE. PARA- SODIUM BORATE LEAD SOAP PETROLEUM SPIRITS ACETIC ACID HEPTACHLOR ETHYLENE OXIDE CONDENSATE HYDROGEN CHLORIDE AMMONIA EIHYLENE GLYCOL TRICHLOROETHANE, 1.1.1- BEHZENE FORMIC ACID CARBON TETRACHLORIDE METHANOL PARAFFIN ALCOHOL 'ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO- DICHLOROETHANE. 1.2- TOLUENE XYLEME TURPF.HTINE CRESUL PROP^NOL, 1- TETRACHLOROETHYLENE TALC NAPHTHA-SOLVENT CARBON DISULFIDE PHENOL ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL SILICA. AMORPHOUS FUSED GRAPHITE OXALIC ACID ZINC CHLORIDE ANILINE SULFURIC ACID CAMPHOR CHLOROFORM EXPOSURE FACTOR 4.264 3,968 12,786 3,592 4.899 3,297 3,202 4,542 2.971 2,926 4,086 3,569 2,448 3,330 2.117 3,020 2,067 2.839 1,789 5,944 2,303 1,527 2,155 2,069 ,746 ,215 ,197 ,711 ,627 1,086 1.086 1,074 10,595 1,440 1.235 850 810 1.151 995 965 673 EXPOSURE INDEX .194 .180 .582 .163 .223 .150 .145 .206 .135 .133 .186 .162 .111 .151 .096 .137 .094 .129 .081 .270 .104 .069 .098 .094 .079 .055 .054 .077 .074 .049 .049 .048 .482 .065 .056 .038 .036 .052 .045 . 043 .030 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 03 10 07 10 10 07 10 10 07 07 10 07 10 07 10 07 10 03 07 10 07 07 07 10 10 07 07 10 10 10 01 07 07 10 10 07 07 07 10 WEIGHTED INDEX 1.942 1.807 1.747 1.636 1.561 1.501 1.458 1.448 1.353 1.332 1.302 1.137 1.115 1.061 .964 .962 .941 .905 .814 .812 .734 .695 .687 .659 .556 .553 .545 .545 .518 .494 .494 .489 .482 .459 .393 .387 . 368 . 366 . 317 .307 . 306 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 8060 HOSPITALS Table 5.5-1 (2) OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS IHFOM CODE 1860 0871 1030 0527 2260 2532 0040 0290 0820 2085 1470 1010 2140 I 0860 M 0515 ui 0900 image: ------- the pathology lab. Other air samples revealed concentrations of carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxide, xylene, toluene and isopropanol, but none were over the PEL. Hospitals as an industry did not rank high in the IBER ranking system. If chronic hazards (OSHA hazard weights 7 and 10) only are considered, hospitals rank 248 (out of 475) in the IBER system. If acute hazards are considered as well (OSHA hazard weights 1, 3, 7, and 10), then hospitals have an IBER rank of 180, placing the industry in the 38th percentile of IBER hazardous industries. 5.5.4 Further Information Sources of information on occupational hazards in hospitals can be found as follows: a) NIOSH Publications (per the 1984 catalog): • 49 Health Hazard Evaluations • 6 Control Technology Reports • 1 Industry Wide Study • 10 reports (approximately) not included in categories above; b) CAL/OSHA Special Studies Report, April 1984, Occupational Exposures to Ethvlene Oxide in : Hospitals. Medical Products Industries. Spice Plants. State of California, DIR, DOSH c) While a literature review is not in the scope of this section, two excellent articles summarize hospital occupational hazards, with extensive references: • Patterson, W.B., et al, "Occupational Hazards to Hospital Personnel," Annals of Internal Medicine. Vol. 102, No. 5, May 1985, 658-680 (370 refs.); • Vainio, Harri, "Inhalation Anesthetics, Anticancer Drugs and Sterilants as Chemical Hazards in Hospitals," Scandinavian Journal of Work and Environmental Health. 8 (1982), 94-107 (92 refs). REFERENCES 1. Selevan, Sherry G. et al, "A Study of Occupational Exposure to Antineoplastic Drugs and Fetal Loss in Nurses", The New England Journal of Medicine. Vol. 313, No. 19, November 7, 1985, 1173-1178. -157- image: ------- 5.6 FMC Corporation (SIC 3795) 5.6.1 Introduction FMC Corporation is a large, multi-product company head-quartered in Chicago. Santa Clara County formerly was home to three FMC Divisions, including Ordnance, Airline Equipment, and Food Processing machinery, all based in San Jose. The Airline Equipment and Food Processing Divisions have been relocated out of Santa Clara, and have been replaced by the Company's International Division and its Defense Systems Headquarters. These two units, along with the Ordnance Division, are concerned principally with the manufacture of three military vehicles, the Bradley .Fighting Vehicle, the Ml 13 Armored Personnel Carrier, and the Amphibious Assault Vehicle. They also perform research and development on defense technology. FMC Corporation is included among industry profiles because it is a large Santa Clara County employer, employing over one percent of the County's entire workforce, and it has a record of hazardous exposures to workers, as identified by CAL/OSHA and NIOSH. 5.6.2. Demographics FMC Corporation employs 6,680 people at various sites in San Jose and the city of Santa Clara, approximately half (3,200) of whom are production line workers. The 6,680 FMC employees represent just over 1% of the County's workforce. (Note: the total number of FMC employees presented here was obtained directly from FMC, and is current as of February 1986. Tha. NIOSH Industrial File employee listings for FMC, dating from 1983, are somewhat smaller). The Industrial Classification of FMC's military operations has proven a source of confusion to CAL/OSHA, NIOSH, and Dun & Bradstreet's Marketing Services (the source of the NIOSH Industrial File). CAL/OSHA inspections of FMC military manufacturing plants listed the SIC as 3489 (ordnance) which properly refers only to artillery and not vehicles, while a NIOSH HHE of these same operations listed the SIC as 999 (nonclassifiable establishments). The NIOSH Industrial File also lists FMC's military facilities inappropriately, under SIC 5199 (nondurable goods - wholesale). For purposes of comparing FMC occupational hazards to other firms which manufacture similar products, none of these three designations is useful. The SIC 3795 -- tanks --would probably allow the best comparisons for purposes of this report " the armored vehicles manufactured by FMC are not strictly tanks, but all have some armoring and are all, like tanks, full-track vehicles. Due to the misclassification of FMC in the NIOSH Industrial File, we did not focus on this firm on the basis of its employment alone. Both a member of the Santa Clara County Chamber of Commerce and members of SCCOSH mentioned FMC as a possible subject of further inquiry in this report, however. 5.6.3 Operations FMC is involved primarily with assembly of the three military vehicles named above, receiving many of the parts pre-fabricated. Production processes span a wide range of -158- image: ------- fabricated metal and vehicle manufacturing processes, including metal plating, spray painting, tool grinding, machining, degreasing, welding, gluing, foam injection, styrene impregnation, riveting, plasma arc cutting, metal coating, and others. 5.6.4 CAL/OSHA Inspection Records CAL/OSHA conducted eight health inspections of FMC between 1979 and 1984, three of which resulted in citations for overexposures. One of the overexposure citations involved nuisance dust in the airline equipment division, which is no longer located in Santa Clara County. The other two citations were given as a result of two separate 1979 inspections of FMC's military manufacturing operations, one involving overexposures to aluminum welding fumes, and the other involving overexposures to total particulates from undifferentiated welding fumes. The substances and monitored exposure levels from CAL/OSHA inspections (1979-84) of FMC's military vehicle manufacturing plants are shown in Table 5.6-1. It should be noted that most of the substances monitored, including ammonia, chloric acid, iron oxide, welding fume, 1,1,1,-trichloroethane, manganese, nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, and aldehydes, were all well below the PEL. Only one other substance, MDI (methylene bisphenyl diisocyanate), was monitored near 50% of the PEL. In addition to the citations for violations of PEL's, CAL/OSHA issued a citation for violation of the respirator standard (GISO 5144) found in the 1982 inspection. No overexposures were found during this inspection, however, among the four substances sampled. The most recent inspection reviewed (1984) did not include any monitoring. However. the inspection file contained some of FMC's own monitoring results for aluminum oxide and chrome welding fumes, which were near or above the CAL/OSHA PEL's. The specific results are treated here as confidential, because the manner in which they were taken is not known. No hazard was encountered in this inspection by the CAL/OSHA inspector, and no citations were issued. 5.6.5 The 1984 NIOSH Health Hazard Evaluation In 1984, at the request of representatives of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, local 562, NIOSH conducted an HHE (HETA 84-368-1624) of FMC Corporation, encompassing six military vehicle manufacturing facilities in San Jose. Both environmental and medical evaluations were performed. 5.6.5.1 NIOSH Environmental Evaluation NIOSH monitored worker exposures to seventeen substances, including acetone, asbestos, benzene, cadmium, chromium VI, copper, ethyl acetate, hexane, manganese, methyl isobutyl ketone, methyl ethyl ketone, nickel, styrene, toluene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, and xylene. Exposures to noise and total particulates were also evaluated. Of the hazards evaluated by NIOSH, only one was found to be above the CAL/OSHA PEL — nuisance dust (total particulates). The high levels (two samples at 104% of the PEL) were found in welding areas. One other substance, the solvent methyl ethyl ketone (MEK.) was found at a level close to, but not exceeding, the CAL/OSHA PEL. The single level obtained for MEK was 91% of the MEK' PEL of 200 ppm. -159- image: ------- Table 5.6-1 Substances and Exposure Levels Evaluated for FMC Corporation (Military Vehicle Manufacture) in CAL/OSHA Inspections, 1979-84 Number Insp. Year Substances Monitored Samples 1 1979 Welding funes 2 1979 Ammonia, ammonia hydroxide 3 1979 .Aluminum welding fumes 4 1980 Chromic acid (plating process) 5 1982 Welding fumes (iron oxide) MOI (methylene diisocyanate) 1 ,1 ,1-trichloroethane Manganese 6 1983 Nitrogen dioxide Nitrogen oxide Carbon monoxide Aldehydes 7 NAC NA 3 1 3 1 1 NA MA NA Range* 6.7-18.9 mg/m3h «?.7 mg/m 420 mg/m-* <0.005- 0.022 mg/m3) 0.53 mg/m3 0.01-0.1 ng/m3 - ?4 ppmd 0.006 mg/m3 peak: ?.8 ppm 10 ppm peak: 0.83 ppm Current CAL/OSHA Mean PEL 11.9 ng/m3 10 mg/m3 NA 10 ng/n3 NA 10 ng/m3 <0.01.1 ng/n3 0.1 mg/m3 5 mg/m3 <0.0fi ng/n3 0.? ng/m3 150 ppm 1 mg/m3 5 ppm SO ppm 100 ppm (acetylaldehydel 1984 none a. All measurements are 8 hr. TWA unless otherwise noted. b. Milligrams per cubic meter of air. c. Not available (file contained only summary of monitoring results) d. parts per mi 11 ion. -160- image: ------- Despite the high exposures measured for nuisance dust, and the relatively high exposure measured for MEK, NIOSH did not conclude that a health hazard existed due to these substances, beyond recommending appropriate respirator use. NIOSH did find, however, that the exposure levels monitored for benzene did pose a health hazard, and that those monitored for chromium VI posed a potential hazard, even though sampled exposures to both substances were well below CAL/OSHA PEL'S. In evaluating these exposures, NIOSH used its own more stringent criteria, based upon its own analysis of current toxicological knowledge regarding these substances. In the case of chromium VI, a substance for which "sufficient" evidence of human carcinogenicity exists according to the International Agency for Research on Cancer, the NIOSH Evaluation criterion is 0.001 mg/m^, or 50 times lower than the current CAL/OSHA PEL. In the case of benzene, for which "sufficient" evidence of human carcinogenicity also exists, the NIOSH evaluation criterion is "lowest feasible limit". The absence of respirator use in the gluing area meant detected levels of up to 0.93 ppm were above the NIOSH criterion. 5.6.5.2 NIOSH Medical Evaluation A NIOSH physician conducted private interviews with 22 workers from various work areas. Symptoms discussed included a) nausea and headaches associated with use of 1,1,1,-trichloro-ethane during periodic maintenance cleaning, b) sharp chest pain and cardiac arrhythmia associated with gluing, c) eye irritation associated with steam cleaning operations, d) bronchitis and chest tightness associated with welding, e) headache, sleepiness, and other symptoms associated with use of a particular thinner, and f) dermatitis, asthma, eye irritation, respiratory irritation, headache, and fatigue associated with machine coolant exposure. 5.6.5.3 NIOSH Recommendations On the basis of medical and environmental findings, NIOSH made 15 separate recommendations to FMC, most of which simply involved the application of basic, sound industrial hygiene practices, such as appropriate ventilation, monitoring, worker training, and use of personal protection equipment (e.g. gloves, goggles, and respirators) where indicated. NIOSH also recommended pulmonary function tests for workers involved in foam injection operations, and recommended specific means of controlling air concentrations of hazards in situations where space constraints made the use of respirators impractical. 5.6.6 FMC Summary FMC has a relatively large Santa Clara County workforce, including a large number of production workers. These workers are exposed to a variety of toxic substances, including potential carcinogens, solvents, respiratory sensitizers (MDI), and metals. CAL/OSHA and NIOSH monitoring data disclose instances of high exposure concentrations over several years, particularly in welding operations. The CAL/OSHA monitoring data is especially significant in light of the very limited number of actual PEL violations found by CAL/OSHA in Santa Clara County, in any SIC, between 1979 and 1984. The large worker population, the use of toxic substances involved, and the history of high exposures at FMC argue the need for continued scrutiny of worker exposures by FMC and CAL/OSHA. We did not investigate for this report whether or to what extent FMC has implemented the NIOSH recommendations contained in the 1984 HHE. -161- image: ------- 6. RECOMMENDATIONS The recommendations in this report are classified into three categories: a) Improvement of the available data bases and data collection. b) High priority industries for further investigation. c) Research needs in particular industries. 6.1. Recommended Improvements in Data Collection and Use This subsection contains specific recommendations for adapting existing data gathering programs in ways which could enhance surveillance of occupational exposure and related disease outcomes by helping to create viable linkages between them. Suggestions will be made concerning the utilization of demographic and exposure data. 6.1.1 Demographic Data Recommendations 6.1.1.1 EDD should allow access to "confidential" data. A cooperative relationship should be initiated between the Employment Development Department (EDD) and relevant agencies to allow access to an industry-occupation matrix, along with related growth projections. The ability to use data gathered by EDD is essential if an adequate occupational health surveillance system is to be developed. We are not entirely aware of the basis of the EDD confidentiality requirements, i.e., whether they are required by legislative mandate or are matters of state policy. Whatever the basis of the requirement, relief should be sought in order that the information be available to other state agencies. Selection of either the Occupational Employment Survey (OES) survey matrix or the Census-based matrix should take into consideration the population sub-groups to be targeted for educational and/or enforcement activities, since the two matrices encompass different populations. The Census-based matrix includes self-employed persons but excludes second jobs, while the OES survey includes second jobs but excludes railroad workers, domestic workers as well as workers in agriculture, education and hospitals. Such a matrix could be progressively "filled in" as applicable exposure and disease data are developed. Knowing the proportional occupational breakdown within industries would help in utilizing data which are by occupation only. Knowing the projected growth trends would also assist in identifying industries and occupations expected to expand. In addition to the obvious convenience, a ready-made matrix obtained from EDD would have several significant advantages over one constructed from other sources: it would be more accurate, more up-to-date, and more valid at the local level in any California county than national data bases. -162- image: ------- 6.1.1.2. CAL/OSHA should adopt industry ranking approaches. In addition to computerizing exposure data from compliance inspections, CAL/OSHA should consider adopting the methods described in the report as one of the bases for scheduling inspections as well as developing other approaches to scheduling. 6.1.1.3. Hazard Surveillance should be part of DIR and DOHS efforts. The Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) and the Department of Health Services (DOHS) need to give greater attention to the implementation of hazard and health surveillance systems. The current system of priority setting which relies on the individual worker or union for ascertaining if a health hazard exists—while important—is not entirely satisfactory for priority setting purposes. That is, compliance activity by CAL/OSHA has historically been driven by employee complaints even in the health area, where workers are not necessarily knowledgeable about the hazards they face, and where and where information alone may not suffice. Relying on worker-initiated complaints or requests is important in the overall attempt to protect the state's working population; the state also needs to develop a more sophisticated surveillance system so that scientists and health professionals can use their expertise to establish occupational health priorities. We propose that the state consider different approaches to setting occupational health priorities which will be based upon the implementation of a comprehensive hazard and health surveillance system. These new approaches would have the effect of broadening the data bases available for surveillance purposes. 6.1.1.4 Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinance Data should be expanded and computerized. EPA, the State of California, the County of Santa Clara and the local municipalities need to review the lack of computerization of the information gathered under hazardous materials ordinances. Passage of local ordinances which provide for collection of information on the location and use of toxic chemicals represents important legislation, but failure to implement those rules and lack of computerization render the statutes relatively useless. Local agencies should ensure all relevant data are collected, such as SIC, to ensure the data are useful for surveillance purposes. Coordination between the task force developing the statewide approach and the IEMP is essential. 6.1.1.5 Health outcome data deserves analysis in a separate study. This report has used information on chemical hazards and exposures to rank industry for purposes of follow-up. A similar study should be conducted which evaluates information from health outcome, disease surveillance, epidemiological studies and injury and illness reporting schemes to rank industries according to their potential for having occupational health problems. This study would presumably identify weaknesses in available data bases as well as identifying populations at risk. Careful attention needs to be given to methods for evaluating anecdotal reports of illness and injury. An evaluation of health outcome data for Santa Clara County would focus and narrow the issues to be addressed. Some deficiencies in current data bases or data sources related to health outcomes are noted in this report (Section 2 and Appendix 10), and include lack of industry and occupation variables in disease surveillance systems. -163- image: ------- 6.1.2 Exposure Data Recommendations 6.1.2.1 CAL/OSHA should computerize exposure monitoring results. Inasmuch as CAL-OSHA exposure records represent the only actual measured exposures on a local level, CAL-OSHA should computerize and tabulate these sampling results by SIC in a manner similar to and comparable with the OSHA MIS System. The specific substances encountered and their airborne concentrations should be computerized by four digit SIC code. In addition, occupation and specific job title information should be computerized for each sample taken. This represents one of our most important recommendations and will have implications for research, for targeting .inspections, special studies and data-based educational efforts. Our inability to obtain CAL-OSHA exposure information represented one most vexing problem in this study. 6.1.2.2. The number of substances requiring user registration should be expanded. Consideration should also be given to establishing reporting requirements by industry for certain specific noncarcinogenic substances. Registration of use is currently required for regulated carcinogens under the Occupational Cancer Control Act. Additional chemical agents such as lead, other metals, silica, solvents and other recognized toxic agents should also require reporting. The list of carcinogens which require reporting should also be expanded to include chemicals identified by the National Toxicology. Program and the International Agency for Research on Cancer. 6.1.2.3 CAL/OSHA should obtain employer-collected monitoring data. CAL/OSHA should consider promulgating standards requiring employers to conduct environmental monitoring, and where appropriate, biological monitoring for specific agents with recognized toxicity. CAL/OSHA should collect these data on a periodic basis and they should be computerized. This information would then form the basis for ongoing surveillance of chemical hazards. This recommendation is most appropriately implemented at the statewide level by CAL/OSHA. The Santa Clara County Health Department could also consider adopting monitoring requirements. 6.2. Highest Priority Industries Recommendations. The industries found in Table 4-11 are those industries which our approaches to ranking have identified as having the greatest potential for workplace exposures. These industries may require further evaluation to assess a) whether significant exposures exist, b) whether there are health problems associated with workplace exposures, and c) which agencies and approaches are most appropriate to assess the potential for exposure. In some instances additional research is required, e.g. the semiconductor industry (SIC 3674), whereas compliance activity is most appropriate where there is a plausible belief that excessive exposures are occurring. The data in other tables on industries ranking high in IBERS, OWI, IRI, and employment are also worthy of review. Finally, the professional judgement of occupational health professionals in the county will be extremely important in reviewing these lists. Persons familiar with the industry in the county may be able to -164- image: ------- review these rankings and provide valuable insight regarding research and compliance priorities. 6.2.1 Small Employers. There are numerous industries identified in this report which have a history of high exposures to specific chemicals but which are generally small or which have no fixed location. Examples include SICs 1611 (Highway and Street Construction), 1761 Roofing and Sheet Metal Contractors), 3479 (Metal Coating and Allied Services), 3499 (Fabricated Metal Products), 3544 (Special Dies, Tools, Jigs, and Fixtures), 3679 (Electronic Components not elsewhere classified), 7216 (Dry Cleaning Plants) and 7699 (Repair Services not elsewhere classified). All the above industries are in the top 20% of the IBER ranking, employ over 500 people in Santa Clara County, consist overwhelmingly of firms with under 50 employees, and have over half their total workforce employed in such firms (see also Table 4-7, and Appendix 4). Those industries with a large total employment base and a large number of establishments, especially those with no fixed location (e.g. SIC 1761) require a significantly different approach than a large employer with a single fixed location. This problem is clearly not unique to Santa Clara county. CAL/OSHA should consider a meeting or conference on approaches to small industry which would of necessity include health educators, health care providers to a particular geographic area, industry and labor representatives, in order to develop a comprehensive strategy on small business. Our analysis suggests that there have been very high exposures to highly toxic materials identified in these industries and they identified in firms in these industries and they should not be excluded because of their size. 6.3. Recommendations for Special Research Related to the Semiconductor Industry (SIC 3674). 6.3.1 Background. The electronic component manufacturing industry is a focus of our recommendations for research for the following reasons: a) The electronics industry is very large in Santa Clara County and it is anticipated that the industry will continue to grow in the future. b) The vast majority of other industries in Santa Clara County are amenable to the intervention and surveillance activities of CAL/OSHA and the County of Santa Clara. Most of the industries employ many fewer people and the problems are reasonably well recognized. c) The electronics industry has the potential to be a model of preventive occupational health practice which could affect the development of occupational health programs in other newly developing or rebuilding industries. Some of the approaches taken already by the larger industries represent important innovations in occupational health management. -165- image: ------- d) As a rapidly changing industry with a high degree of technological innovation there is always the concern that new techniques for manufacturing may have the potential for significant health problems. Constant surveillance and research therefore is an important element in assessing potential problems. e) There is oft expressed public concern about the potential for accidents and numerous anecdotal reports of illness, especially associated with solvent exposure, acid and base exposure, arsenic exposure, toxic gas use, epoxy resins and cellosolves in the electronics industry. There have been particular concerns raised around reproductive toxicity. In our view, there need to be hazard and illness surveillance systems established which address these concerns and anecdotal reports. Further research to assess the scope and magnitude of these potential problems is appropriate. The development of this industrial base is very important to the county and significant effort needs to occur to develop the most progressive approaches to hazard control such that public and worker concerns are addressed and that existing problems are dealt with systematically in both the short and long term. 6.3.2 Semiconductor Industry Recommendations. 6.3.2.1 The county health department should attempt to initiate epidemiologicai studies of the semiconductor industry, perhaps in cooperation with health care providers or appropriate federal and state agencies. Epidemiologicai studies designed to assess the risks due to chemical exposure in electronics industry SICs, perhaps in cooperation with Kaiser or other health care providers should be considered. The County may wish to request research studies from NIOSH, the Occupational Health Centers or the Department of Health Services. From an epidemiologic standpoint there is little to no data available on the problems facing workers in these industries. 6.3.2.2 Neurobehavioral screening should be used to assess solvent exposure effects. Neurobehavioral screening studies designed to assess the impact of solvent exposure on the central nervous system in solvent exposed workers should be considered. We received numerous anecdotal reports from physicians, industrial hygienists and workers themselves on neurobehavioral problems associated with solvent exposure. Since exposure levels are generally well within standards in these industries, there is concern that current standards may be inadequate or that significant dermal exposure may be occurring. Numerous industries throughout the U.S. have solvent exposure problems and therefore the selection of the most appropriate cohort is an important methodological issue. In our view, neurotoxicology and neuroepidemiblogy of the solvents used in these industries represents an important, unresolved research issue. 6.3.2.3 The county should research means of addressing chemical burns in the industry. Chemical burns account for a significant proportion of physicians' first reports of injury in this industry. Further research on the control, minimization, and treatment of -166- image: ------- chemical burns should be an area of follow-up by the county. 6.3.2.4 Biological monitoring requirements should be considered for this industry. Review of the chemicals used in the industry should be conducted for the express purpose of identifying whether any biological monitoring requirements should be considered specifically for this industry. 6.3.2.5 Toxicological mechanisms of Cellosolve solvents and exposure levels of these solvents in the semiconductor industry require further study. Cellosolve solvents used in the industry have raised concerns among electronics workers and their advocates. The reproductive toxicity of "cellosolves" does not appear to derive from mutagenicity or other irreversible biological processes. Further research by NIOSH needs to be conducted on the mechanism of the reproductive toxicity of these compounds with particular attention being given to the establishment of safe levels of exposure. In this regard, additional characterization of exposure levels in this industry is appropriate. A joint effort between .NIOSH, CAL/OSHA and the County would be conducted. The cellosolves have low vapor pressures, and therefore attention should be focused on the prevention of skin contact. Substitution of a less toxic solvent would be an appropriate, even preferred, approach to the control of Cellosolve exposure. If it is determined that substitution is not viable, then the State of California needs to consider how to address reproductive toxins especially as a matter of policy. There are currently no guidelines at the state or federal level on approaches to the regulation of reproductive toxins. 6.3.2.6 Assiduous exposure monitoring is critical and should include maintenance, cleanup, and repair operations. Our recommendations for the requirement for environmental monitoring with subsequent reporting and computerization by state or local agencies of the data are appropriate to certain chemicals in use in these industries, e.g., arsenic, cellosolves and other solvents. Monitoring of exposures during maintenance, cleanup, and repair operations is particularly relevant. This would appear to be especially true in a highly complex industry of this type where acute exposures are possible during equipment failure. Continuous monitoring of arsenic levels would appear to be a high priority. 6.3.2.7 Research into toxic exposures from ion-implantation processes should continue. Ion-implantation processes also require further research of the type described by Ungers et al. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., 46(8), 416-420 (1985). 6.3.2.8 Santa Clara County should address anecdotal reports of illness in the industry. Exposure levels to toxic chemicals in these industries tend to be very low when they are measured, but nonetheless there are numerous anecdotal reports of illness. There have been often stated concerns that acute exposures during accidental releases may have had important health consequences. We recommend the Santa Clara Department of -167- image: ------- Health take the lead role in evaluating the existence and severity of these reports. The County should attempt to involve the clinical community in the County, including the occupational medicine clinic of the Valley Medical Center. Health care providers represent an important resource for identification and clinical evaluation of illness; in IEMP Phase 2, a concerted effort should be made to involve this important segment of the Community. Representatives from industry, the Santa Clara Department of Health, health care providers, and NIOSH should develop a mechanism for tracking possible work related complaints to confirm the accuracy of the anecdotal reports. 6.3.2.9 Industry and local agencies must continue to assess the potential for catastrophic accidents. An assessment of the potential for catastrophic events associated with toxic chemical explosions, leaks or spills is not within the scope of this report. However, the issue of chemical storage, chemical use (amounts), emergency response planning, and other related issues should be the focus of further study. We were impressed with the efforts of some of the large electronics employers in the county in this area, but we believe a comprehensive evaluation including both large and small employers is important. -168- image: ------- APPENDIX 1 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING METHODS Monitoring for Participates Paniculate sampling consists of measuring the airborne concentrations of dusts (0.1-1000 um or microns), fumes (0.0001 um), and smokes (0.01-2 um), and of liquid aerosols (droplets suspended in air). Aerosols are differentiated according to particle size and generally are described according to their aerodynamic diameter. Dusts are formed from solid materials by smokes are products of incomplete combustion of organic materials, crushing , grinding, etc., and fumes result from processes such as evaporation, sublimation and condensation. In general, aerosol sampling strategies are dependent upon the nature of the paniculate. Substances which exert their effects deep in the lung, such as crystalline silica, are sampled using techniques which identify the respirable fraction (<10 m), whereas other substances are measured for total dust concentration. Paniculate collection devices can be grouped into five categories: 1) settling chambers; 2) centrifugal devices; 3) impingers and impactors; 4) filters; 5) electrostatic precipitators and thermal precipitators. Settling chambers are used for grab samples, whereby air is trapped in a container, and the particles are allowed to settle onto glass slides for microscopic inspection. Centrifugal devices consist of conical or helical devices, known as "cyclones" or curved surface traps, through which air is pumped and the partic- ulates removed by centrifugal force. This technique separates the respirable paniculate from the large paniculate. The cyclone is generally used for silica and coal mine dust sampling. Impingers and impactors take advantage of the inertial property of particulates. Impingers remove particulates by bubbling an air flow through water, while impactors use sudden changes in the direction of air flow to 'drop' particulates on a flat surface. "Cascade impactors" pump air through a series of plates to separate particulates by size. Impactors are used to characterize the size distribution of a particular aerosol. Filters are one of the best and most common of paniculate sampling methods. A variety of filters made from materials such as paper, cellulose, and glass fiber, can be used depending on the kind of paniculate sample. Air is pumped through the filters and the particulates thus trapped are weighed to determine mass concentrations (either total or respirable). In electrostatic precipitators. an airstream is passed through an electrically charged field, and the subsequently charged particulates are attracted to a collecting electrode. Thermnl precipitation removes particles from an airstream by passing it through a channel having a significant temperature change perpendicular to the direction of flow. The particles move toward decreasing temperatures and are deposited on a collecting surface. Monitoring for Gases and Vapors Different methods are used for grab samples and integrated samples. Grab snmcle? are usually collected when analysis is .to be performed on gross amounts of gases in air (such as methane, carbon monoxide, oxygen, and carbon dioxide) or when peak concentra- tions are sought. The development of highly sensitive laboratory instruments, however, has extended the use of grab sampling to low levels of contaminants as well. A-l image: ------- Devices used to take grab samples include vacuum flasks, gas or liquid displacement collectors, metallic or glass collectors, syringes and plastic bags. Vacuum flasks are evacuated heavy walled containers which can be filled with the air sample by breaking a sealed entry to the container and then resealing it with wax or other material. In dis- placement containers, the original air is replaced by the sample through pumping, or water is drained out of a container to draw in an air sample. Water displacement cannot be used for soluble gases. Flexible plastic bags can simply be pumped full of air, can take very large samples and have the further advantages of being light, non-breakable, inexpen- sive to ship and easy to use. Integrated sampling of the workroom atmosphere is used when an 8-hour, time weighted average of an exposure has to be calculated, when the composition of the air is not uniform, or when the sensitivity requirements of the method of analysis need an extended sampling period. Integrated samples can be collected by pumping air through an absorbant solution or over an adsorbent surface, which will capture the contaminant and later be sent to a laboratory for analysis, or by passive adsorbent devices (worn as badges) which come into contact with the contaminated air through simple diffusion. The latter are always personal sampling devices, whereas the former can be either stationary area sampling devices, or personal sampling devices worn by the worker. The integrated sampling method which consists of retaining gases and vapors on acti- vated charcoal is by far the most widespread. Use of small charcoal tubes connected to a small portable pump (active sampling) was introduced in 1970. In 1976 it was shown that a layer of charcoal placed in a badge and exposed to a solvent vapor can collect the vapor by diffusion through air or through a plastic membrane (passive sampling). Both methods are very simple and-convenient to use for personal sampling but have their own advan- tages and disadvantages. The pump constitutes a significant source of error and of disturbance, and active sampling requires frequent checks of the flow rate. A major advantage of this method over passive sampling is the flexibility gained in the choice of an appropriate sampling time. Even short periods are possible because the analytical sensitivity does not represent a major limitation, since the flow rate of the pump may be increased if needed. Badges however do not have such flexibility, their "-flow rate" being determined by the diffusion coefficient through the layer in front of the charcoal (air or plastic mem- brane). It corresponds to very low flow rates, which render the badges inconvenien-t for short-term sampling. However their small size, their easy manipulation, and the absence of a pump represent important advantages and make this sampling method very attractive. Some substances such as amines are not easily removed from the charcoal (or silica gel) so another adsorbant has to be used. Also inorganic compounds such as ozone, nitrogen dioxide, chlorine, hydrogen sulfide and sulfur dioxide react chemically with the activated charcoal and thus must be collected with silica gel or another absorbant. Silica gel works well with many gases and vapors but due to its polar character will absorb water preferen- tially to comparatively less polar organic compounds. Thus if the air has a high moisture content and the sampling is continued long enough, water will displace the organic sol- vents. When a gas or vapor may be altered by collecting it in a liquid or when adsorption is difficult, a condensation method can be used. Vapors or gases are separated from sampled air by passing the air through a coil immersed in a cooling medium, dry ice and acetone, liquid air, or liquid nitrogen. This is not ordinarily a portable field technique. A-2 image: ------- In addition to the instantaneous and integrated sampling techniques described above, gases and vapors can be monitored with direct reading methods. A direct reading instru- ment takes in a sample of air, makes a quantitative analysis, and displays the results on a dial or digital reading, on a stripchart recording, or on a tape printout. Direct reading instruments have the advantage of giving instantaneous readings of airborne concentration with a high degree of accuracy. They are useful for a quick evaluation of the workplace situation rather than an assessment of worker exposure. Because of the size and complex- ity of the equipment, its usefulness is limited in measuring worker exposure. Another direct reading technique is the use of colorimetric indicator tubes. The colorimetric indicator tube contains solid reagent chemicals that react with substances in the air drawn through them, producing a color change. In most cases, a fixed volume of sample is pumped through the tube and the length of the stain is measured against a cali- bration scale which is printed directly on the tube or on a chart. The early detector tubes were made for carbon monoxide, hydrogen sulfide, and benzene, but now more than 400 different types are available. A commonly used indicator tube is marketed by Draeger, and hence the so-called "Drae"»r tube." These indicator tubes provide compact direcr reading devices that are convenient to use for detection and semiquantitative estimation of gases and vapors in a work atmosphere. Unfortunately, the accuracy of the indicator tube is very limited. Certified detector tubes are accurate to 35% at 1/2 the TLV They are therefore useful for assessing whether there is a problem or not. If the measured concen- tration is 25% of the standard, the detector tube is of little value. Analytic Techniques There are a variety of analytic methods for analyzing air samples. Particulate samples are generally simply weighed (gravimetric analysis), and exposure calculated based on the time and air flow used in obtaining the sample. The result is expressed as mass of particulate in volume of air, e.g. milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m'). Analysis of gas or vapor samples is much more complex, and can involve highly soph- isticated techniques such as gas and liquid chromatography and mass spectrophotometry. Results are usually expressed as parts per million (ppm) or parts per billion (ppb). Detailed descriptions can be obtained from the APHA Intersociety Committee's Methods of Air Sampling and Analysis.' ' References 1. Katz, Morris, ed.. Methods of Air Sampling and Analysis. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C., 1977. A-3 image: ------- APPENDIX 2 EXAMPLES OF BIOLOGICAL MONITORING This appendix gives examples of biological monitoring techniques for some chemicals commonly used in Santa Clara County industry, in order to convey a better understanding of biological monitoring. Solvents Benzene, absorbed primarily through inhalation of vapors and secondarily through skin contact, produces both acute and chronic toxic effects in those exposed. Acute effects include central nervous system depression and myocardial sensitization to adrenalin; chronic exposure can cause aplastic anemia (Levy & Wegman, 367). The recommended threshold limit value for benzene in the workplace is currently lOppm (30mg/m^). The most frequently analyzed specimen for benzene exposure is urine, where phenol, the major meta- bolite of benzene, is measured. Concentrations higher than 75mg/L indicate exposure to benzene higher than the lOppm TLV (Baselt, 38). It is also reported, however, that phenol concentrations in urine following a 6 hour exposure to benzene at lOppm are around 40mg/L. The measurement of benzene in blood has been studied very little. Evaluation of expired air suggests it may be a more sensitive method for monitoring very low atmo- spheric concentrations. Sampling during the work period represents exposure at that time, while sampling breath in the morning following exposure reflects the integrated exposure during the preceding day. Urine analysis for phenol is accomplished using colorimetry and gas chromatography Blood and breath samples can be analyzed with gas chromatography. Toluene, another solvent, has acute toxic effects similar to benzene (symptoms can include headaches, nausea, lassitude, impaired coordination and memory loss), but appar- ently not the chronic toxicity of benzene (Baselt, 254). The current threshold limit value is lOOppm (375 mg/m^). Assessment of exposure is normally done through urine analysis for toluene's primary metabolite, hippuric acid. This is only useful, however, for moderate to heavy exposure due to the high and variable levels of endogenous hippuric acid. Exposure to lOOppm over one shift has produced urinary concentrations from 2.8 - 4g/L, depending on the analytic technique used. Blood and breath concentrations of toluene correlate well to atmospheric concentrations in subjects at rest, but vary too widely with physical activity to be currently useful in industrial biological monitoring. Gas chromatography and ultra- violet spectrophotometry can both be used in the analysis for hippuric acid in urine, depending on the degree of specificity required, while gas chromatography is commonly used for blood or breath analysis. Xylene is similar to toluene in toxicity, and is well absorbed both through inhalation and skin contact. Its current threshold limit value is lOOppm (435 mg/m3). Biological monitoring for xylene involves sampling urine for m-methyl hippuric acid, a metabolite whose concentration also appears to correlate well with atmospheric xylene concentrations. Urine concentrations of this metabolite, following a 4 hour lOppm exposure averaged 2.6 8/L (Baselt, 287). Breath and blood analysis for xylene, while feasible, has not yet been A-4 image: ------- implemented in industrial biological monitoring. Analytic techniques for evaluation of xylene exposure are the same as those for toluene. Another group of solvents is the halogenated hydrocarbons, represented in Santa Clara County Industry by compounds such as dichloromethane (methylene chloride), trichloroethy- lene (TCE) and 1,1,1-trichloroethane (TCA, also methyl chloroform). All three solvents affect the central nervous system in ways similar to the other solvents discussed. In addition, dichloromethane leads to high carbon monoxide accumulation in vivo (Lauwerys, 82-3), while TCE and TCA have been shown to cause liver and kidney damage in abusers of the chemical compounds, plus electrocardiographic changes in chronically exposed work- ers (Baselt, 258, 262). Dichloromethane exposure may be monitored by the analysis of the substance itself in blood or breath, or its metabolite, carbon monoxide, in the blood. Blood concentrations of dichloromethane should not exceed 2mg/L to correlate with the current atmospheric 200ppm threshold limit value, while blood carboxyhemoglobin saturation (a product of elevated CO levels) should not exceed 5% (Baselt, 113). Trichloroethylene is mostly metabolized to trichloroethanol and trichloroacetic acid, which are excreted in the urine, but due to high individual variation in metabolism and the fact that other chemicals produce the same metabolites in persons exposed, urine analysis has not been a successful monitoring tech- nique for this compound. Expired air concentrations have been shown to correlate fairly well with atmospheric concentrations; they should therefore not exceed Ippm to keep expo- sure within the atmospheric threshold limit value of lOOppm (Baselt, 262). Good correlations between biological samples and atmospheric samples seem to exist for blood, breath and urine analysis of trichloroethane, but none of these methods is presently favored. An upper limit 150ppm for expired air has been proposed to prevent exposure greater than that allowed by the current atmospheric average 8 hour level of 350ppm (1900 mg/m3). Inorganic contaminants Arsenic exposure can be found in the occupational environment in industries such as pesticides, metallurgy, ceramic and glass, Pharmaceuticals and manufacture of semiconduc- tors in the electronics industry. Epidemiological studies suggest that chronic arsenic exposure can lead to cardiovascular and neurological abnormalities, in addition to respira- tory and skin cancers. Inhalation of arsine gas can result in massive hemolysis leading to renal failure and rapid death (Baselt, 30). Levels of organo-arsenic compounds can be measured in the urine to monitor for arsenic exposure. Hair analysis has also been used for assessment of exposure, but it is not frequently employed as it can easily be contami- nated by externally deposited arsenic. Analysis of biological specimens for arsenic concen- trations involves wet or dry ashing of the organic matter, followed by a colorimetric technique or atomic absorption spectrometry. There are no biological monitoring require- ments in the CAL/OSHA arsenic standard. Cadmium, found in metal plating and metallurgical industries, has been shown to cause renal damage (Baselt, 53) and is considered a carcinogen by IARC. Urine cadmium levels can be used to monitor chronic exposure to the metal, while blood concentrations offer a better index to recent exposure and acute intoxication. Urine or blood concentra- tions higher than 0.005 mg/L indicate excessive exposure (Baselt, 54). Atomic absorption spectrometry is used in the lab analysis of specimens. A-5 image: ------- Lead, a metal found in a variety of industries such as paints, storage batteries, insecticides and ceramics, can be monitored in the body both directly as lead, and indi- rectly, through measurement of a physiological change in heme synthesis. Because lead is highly destructive to heme synthesis, increased levels of heme precursors can be measured in the urine. Whole blood assays for lead are required by the CAL/OSHA lead standard. References Baselt, Randall C., Biological Methods of Industrial Monitorine. Biomedical Publications, Davis, California, 1980 Lauwerys, Robert R., Industrial Chemical Exposure: Guidelines for Biological Monitoring. Biomedical Publications, Davis California, 1983 A-6 image: ------- 3204: Access to Employee Exposure and Medical Records 3220: Emergency Action Plan Appendix 3.1 Key CAL/OSHA Standards Applicable to this Report CAL/OSHA occupational health standards are found in Title 8 of the California Administrative Code, under General Industry Safety Orders (GISO's). Standards are referred to by Title 8 Section number (also known as GISO number). Standard (GISO #J_ Section 3203: Accident Prevention Program Components of Standard Employers must implement an Accident Prevention Program to include training workers in both general and specific safe work practices, and regular periodic inspections of the workplace for discovery and cor- rection of unsafe conditions and work practices. Employees are provided a right of access to relevant exposure and medical records. These records include past and present exposres to toxic substances or harmful physical agents, other employees records with similar duties or working conditions, records containing exposure information on the worker workplace(s) ; and, MSDSs. This is deemed necessary in order to improve the detection treatment and prevention of occupational disease. Employers are required to develop and train workers in an emergency action plan which includes procedures for reporting fires and other emergencies, escape routes. alarm systems, an evacuation plan, personnel assigned to rescue and medical duties and emergency procedures. A-7 image: ------- Standard (GISO ») 3221: Fire Prevention Plan 5139-5155: Control of Substances Hazardous -2- Key Components of Standard Employers must have in writing a fire prevention plan that identifies potential fire hazards and proper handling and storage procedures. The plan must designate employees responsible for the maintenance of fire prevention/control equipment and systems, and those reponsible for the control of flammable or combustible waste. The employer must review with each worker those aspects of the plan relevant to the workers assignment. This group of standards requires employers in specific industries where dusts, fumes, mists, vapors and gases are harmful by-products of production to control exposures through the use of specific control technologies, including ventilation systems and personal protective equipment. Sections provide regulations for respirator protective equipment, exhaust emission control and oxygen deficiency. Hazard over-exposures are cited under Sections 5141 or 5155, depending on the nature of the situation. Under section 5155, airborne contaminants permissible exposure limits (PELs) are established for airborne concentrations of substances to indicate the amounts of a substance to which most workers can have daily exposure for a life- time without suffering ill effects. Section 5155 gives PELs for 574 airborne contaminants. Appendix 3.2 shows health effects for some representative air contaminants that are relevant to industries covered in this report. Appendix 3.3 is a reproduction of the entire section 5155. A-i image: ------- Standard Section 51A4: Respiratory Protection Program 5160-5185: Hot, flammable, poisonous, corrosive and irritant substances 5194: Material Safety Data Sheets 5216: Lead -3- Components of Standard When respiratory protection is used in controlling exposures, written operation procedures governing the selection and use of respirators must be established and must include procedures for selection, instruction and training, cleaning and sanitizing, inspection and maintenance. These sections set up minimum standards for the use, handling and storage of hot flammable poisonous corrosive and irritant substances in all places of employment except laboratories and city gas systems. Each employer must have on hand, from the manufacturer, producer or seller of each hazardous substance that is used in the workplace, a MSDS. This document pro- vides pertinent information and a profile of the particular hazardous substance or mixture. It is required that the MSDSs be available to employees and that employees be made aware of the presence of hazardous substances in the workplace. Employers are required to reduce air lead levels to an action level of 30 ug/m^ and a PEL of 50 ug/m . Exposure levels are to be monitored through blood lead and air levels; respirator requirements, work practices and engineering controls are employed for control. A-9 image: ------- Standards Relating to Carcinogens: 5208: Asbestos 5209: Carcinogens Regulations (13 substances) 5210 Vinyl Chloride 5212: DBCP 5213: Acrylonitrile 5214: Inorganic Arsenic 5215: MOCA 5219: EDB 5220: Ethylene Oxide -4- Key Components of Standard The following standards regulate carcinogens. These standards are much more detailed than the Airborne Contaminants Standard (GISO 5155). The standards require registration with the California Department of Industrial Relations, and set forth pro- visions for medical surveillance and monitoring, record keeping, engineering controls and proper work practices. Appendix 3.4 shows major industrial uses of regulated carcinogens, and the permissible exposures defined under the respective standards. A-10 image: ------- Health Appendix 3.2 Effects of Selected Substances Regulated "by GISO 5155 (Airborne Contaminants) Category/ Substance Solvents: Toluene Xylene Benzene MEK (methyl ethyl ketone) MIBK (methyl n-butyl ketone) Acetone Freon (Fluoro- carbon 113) TCE (trich- loro- ethylene) Occupation Industry, Operation Organic chemical mfg., fuel compo- nent, paint ingredient Wide variety of uses as solvent; ingred. in paints, lacquers, varnishes, adhesives, intermediate in organic chemical mfg. Mfg. of organic com- pounds, detergents, pesticides, paint remover Wide variety of uses as a solvent; Inter- mediate in organic chemical mfg. Wide variety of uses as a solvent; inter- mediate in organic chemical mfg. Wide variety of uses as a solvent; inter- mediate in organic chemical mfg. Solvent for cleaning electrical equipment and degreasing machinery Metal degreasing, dry cleaning, paint ingre- dient; electronics industry Some Health Effects CNS depression, irritant, dermatitis Pneumonitis, acute pulmonary edema, irritation, CNS depression CNS depression, leukemia , dermatitis Narcosis, dermatitis Linked with peri- pheral neuropathy Narcosis, dermatitis Found to be cardiotoxic to dogs, monkeys PEL0 Sb 100 ppmc S 100 ppm S 10 ppm 200 ppm 5 ppm 750 ppm 1000 ppm CNS depression 25 ppm Peripheral and cranial neuropathy A-ll image: ------- -2- Category/ Substance Solvents: (TCA) 1,1,1 - Trichloro- ethane Cellosolves (glycol ethers) ethylene glycol/ monoethyl ether ethylene glycol monoethyl/acetate me thy1-and butyl- substituted com- pounds such as ethylene glycol monomethyl ether (contained in epoxy resins) Occupational, Industry, Operation Degreaser, electronics industry Dry cleaning, plastic, ink, and lacquer manu- facturing, textile dying, photoresist processes in * electronic industry. Some Health PEL Effects Anesthetic effects, 350 ppm central nervous system Fatigue, lethargy, S 50 ppm renal failure, chemical hepati- tis, reproductive effects. S 25 ppm Carbon disulfide Methylene chloride Perchloro- ethylene Methanol Gases : Ammon ia Chemical laboratories as a solvent for lipids, halogens rubber; mfg. of organic chemicals; vis- cose rayon Aerosol packaging; anes- thetic makers: paint removal; varnishes and stains Electronics industry, dry cleaning Electronics industry, formaldehyde produc- tion, paints Agriculture, fertilizers Parkinsonism, S 10 ppm psychosis-.chronic nephritic and nephrotic syndromes Metabolized to 100 ppm carbon monoxide: reduction in car- diac output (acute); may accelerate atherosclerosis . (chronic) CMS depression 50 ppn Metabolic acidosis. 200 ppra optic nerve damage and blindness Upper respiratory 25 irritation A-12 image: ------- -3- Category/ Substance Gases; Carbon monoxide Occupation Industry, Operation Garages, filling stations Some Health PEL Effects Diisocyanates (TDI, MDI) Epichlorohydrin (contained in epoxy resins) Fluorine Formaldehyde Polyurethane foam, textiles Adhesives, laminating plastics, electronics industry Uranium processing, aerospace, welding Disinfectants, germi- cides, textiles, film developing, hospitals Hydrogen chloride Electroplating, metal treatment, production of chlorinated organic chemicals Hydrogen cyanide Electroplating, bronzing, photography, electronics industry Phosphoric acid Sulfuric acid Phosphine Diborane Dentistry, semiconductor industry Fertilizers, chemicals, plastics, electronic component industry Semiconductor industry Reduction in 50 ppm cardiac output (acute); may acce- lerate athero- sclerosis (chronic). Asthmatic reaction 0.02 ppm Skin sensitizers 2 ppm Laryngeal spasm 1 ppm bronchospasm Primary irritant, 2 ppm irritation of mucous membranes of the nose, URT and eyes. tooth corrosion 5 ppm Enzyme inhibition 10 ppm with metabolic asphyxia and death Primary irritant 1 mg/m 3d Irritant, burns 1 mg/m3 Numbness of fingers 0.3 ppm (acute exposure) Chronic hepatitis 0.1 ppm following acute exposure A-13 image: ------- -4- Category/ Substance Gases: Arsine Silane Occupation Industry , Operation Semiconductor industry Some Health Effects Intravascular hemolysis, hemo- lysis , hemoglo- binuria, jaundice PEL 0.05 ppm Skin and mucous 5 ppm membranes irritant Dusts, Fumes, Mists; Beryllium Chromium Cadmium Manganese fume Mercury alky Is, as Hg Nickel Silica Aluminum welding fumes Automotive, computers, electronics, aerospace Solder for aluminum, photography Electroplating, process engraving, welding Dry cell batteries, ceramics, paints Electronics industry, pesticides, chemical and medical labs Electroplating, nickel- cadmium batteries, welding Glass, electronics industry, sandblasting masonry, ceramics Welding Granulomatosis 0.002 mg/ji3 and fibrosis of lung Lung cancer Pulmonary edema (acute) Emphysema (chronic) Irritability, memory impair- ment Dermatitis , sensorimotor changes, tremor Sensitization dermatitis, lung cancer 0.5 mg/m3 0.05 mg/a3 mg/ai3 S 0.001 ppm mg/m3 Zinc oxide fume Welding Pneumoconiosis 20 o ppcf Metal fume fever 5 mg/:n3 Metal fume fever 5 m g /13 A-14 image: ------- -5- Category/ Substance Occupational Industry, Operation Some Health Effects PEL Inorganic Acids and Bases: Chromium Trioxide) Metallurgy, chromium (chronic acid) ) plating, electronics ) industry, chemical ) and medical labs, ) fertilizer production Hydrochloric Acid) Hydrofloric Acid) Nitric Acid ) Sodium Hydroxide ) Potassium Hydroxide Burns, eye damage 0.1 mg/m respiratory tract damage 5 ppm 3 ppm 2 ppm 2 mg/m3 2 mg/m 3 A-15 image: ------- -6- Category/ Substance Pesticides: Organo- phosphates: Parathion Malathion Carbamates: Carbaryl Chlorinated Hydrocarbons Aldrin Dieldrin Chlordane DDT Occupational Industry, Operation Some Health Effects PEL Workers who manufacture, formulate, warehouse store, ship and trans- port; applicators, mixers, loaders, irrigators and farm workers. Convulsions , coma, death S S (with long- term expo- sure) CNS depression S with tremors, convulsions S and respira- tory failure S 0.1 mg/m3 10 mg/m3 5 mg/m3 0.25 mg/a3 0.25 mg/m3 0.5 mg/m3 1 Biphenyls: Paraquat Diquat Irritation of eyes, nos-e throat and skin; heart, liver, lung damage on ingestion . 0 . 1 mg/m3 0.5 mg/m3 a. CAL/OSHA permissible exposure limit as of Sept. 1984. b. May be absorbed into the bloodstream through the skin, mucous membranes, or eyes. c. Parts of contaminant per million parts air. d. Milligrams of contaminant per cubic foot of air. e. Millions of particles per cubic foot of air. A-16 image: ------- APPENDIX 3.3 General Industry Safety Order 5155 Title 8 California Administrative Code General Industry Safety Order S1SS establishes exposure limits for controlling worker exposure to 574 airborne contaminants. PREFACE Permissible Exposure Limits (PELs) are established for airborne concentrations of substances to indicate the conditions and amounts of a substance to which most workers can have daily exposure for a lifetime without suffering ill effects. PELs are based on current information from industrial experience and research involving animals and humans. In some Ci.ses a PEL is established to protect against illness or disease, and in others it is established to protect against irritation, narcosis, nuisance or other forms of stress. PELs tpply only to occupational settings and occupational exposures and are best measured and interpreted by an industrial hygienist. PELs are not intended to: indicate the hazard or toxicity of a substance; to be used in estimating the toxic potential of continuous uninterrupted exposures or other extended work periods; or as proof or disproof of an existing disease or physical condition. Employers are required by law to ensure that employees are not exposed to airborne concentrations of substances above the PLLs, however, an accidental or short-term overexposure will not necessarily produce adverse health effects. The best practice is to maintain concentrations of all airborne contaminants below the PEL to as low a level as possible. A-17 image: ------- CO It is also possible that very sensitive individuals ••/ experience disconfort or become ill when they are exposed to a substance at concentrations at or below the PEL, or such an exposure Bay aggravate a pre-existing health condition. You cannot trust your senses to tell you when you are being exposed above the PEL. Many substances have no odor yet are very dangerous.while others Bay be easy to snell even at low, safe levels. Only a trained person, such as an industrial hygienist, using Monitoring equipnent can accurately Measure the airborne levels of i substance. Please read pages 3-5 carefully for an understanding of the tables contained in GISO S1SS. Many substances rarely used in industrial processes do not appear in GISO S1SS because they are either not toxic or there is not sufficient information about a substance to warrant establishing a PEL for it. Other CAL/OSHA regulations have been established for substances identified as occupational carcinogens; see General Industry Safety Orders 5208-5215 and 5217-S219. These carcinogens and the substances listed in GISO S1S5 are subject to the requirements of GISO S194 concerning employee training and information and Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDSs) and of GISO 1204 concerning employee access to medical and exposure records. If you have any questions regarding these regulations, contact the nearest office of either the CAL/OSHA Consultation .Service or •^f Division of Occupational Safety and Health. If you have any questions about the health effects of exposure to any of the substances listed in this booklet or of any toxic substance, contact the Hazard Evaluation System and Information Service (HESIS) by phone fro» 8 a.m. - S p.m. Monday through Friday at 415-540-1014 (collect calls are accepted), or in writing to: HESIS, 21S1 Berkeley Hay, Berkeley, CA 94704. To obtain an order blank for ordering the General Industry Safety Orders and other sections of Title 8, or to obtain publications regarding the safe handling of toxic substances in the workplace, contact CAL/OSHA Couunications: S2S Golden Gate Ave. - 3rd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102; 415- 5S7-2237. TITLES CrNKHAl. INLH'STrn SAFETY OHDtHS $ 5155 {R.gilKr U. No »*—a-2O-U) (p 432.259) 5155. Airborne Contaminants. (a) Scope and Application (I) This section establishes requirements for controlling employee exposure to ,ui home coiiLimin. nits and skin coi.lacl uilli those substances which are reachl) absorbed through the skin and are designated by the "S" notation in Tables ACM and AC-2, at all places of employment in the itale. (2.i When this section references another section for controlling employee exposures to a particular airborne contaminant, the provisions of this section for such substance shall apply only lo ihos1 places of employment which are ex- empt from the other standard. NOTK Tables AC-I. AC2 and AC-3 of this section present concentration limits for airborne contaminants lo which nearl> all uoikers mav be exposed dail) during a 40 hour workweek fur a uoikmK lifetime without adverse effect Because of some variation in individual susceplibililv. an occasional worker niav suffer discomfort, aggravation of a pre eustmg condiliun, 01 occupational disease upon exposure lo concentrations even below the v allies specified in these tables The enposure limits established bv this section retire I current medical opinion and industrial hv giene practice, doubts being resolved on the side of safelv. and aie intended lo be used u> accordance with good industrial hvgiene practice bv qualified persons The Division recognises the need for almost continuous review of these concentration limits and also anticipates the need for including new or additional substances Consequent!), the Division, as authorized b) Labor Code Section (kit 151 h) el sec) . mavrequire an emplover lo control harmful exposures lo atmospheric contaminants which are not included in this section (b) Definitions Ceiling Limit. The maximum concentration of an air- borne contaminant lo which an employee may be exposed at any time tight-Hour Time-Weighted Average Concentration (TWA). An em- ployee's exposure, as measured or calculated by the formula in Appendix A, to an airborne contaminant during a workday Kxcursion Duration Maximum lime period permitted for an exposure above the excursion limit but not exceeding the ceiling limit. Kxcursion Limit The maximum concentration of an airborne contaminant appearing in Table AC-2 lo which an employee may be exposed without regard lo duration prov ided (he eight-hour time-weighted average concentration does nol exceed the permissible exposure limit Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL). The maximum permitted 8-hour time- weighted average concentration of an airborne contaminant (c> Exposure Limits M) Permissible Exposure Limits (PEI.s) (Ai An employee exposure to an airborne contaminant in a workday, ex- pressed as 8-hour TU'A concentration, shall nol exceed the PEL specified for the substance in Table AC-1, AC 2. or AC 3 (hi When substances have additive health effects as described in Appendix 11, the value of D shall nol exceed unity (2) Short Term Limits (Ai Table' AC-2 Substances Emplovee exposure shall be controlled such thai the duration of exposure at any concentration above I he excursion limit but nol exceeding the ceiling limit is no grealei than the specified excursion dura- tion image: ------- fSISS O'KM.HM. I.MU-.VTR1 SAKtm OHUEBS TITLK 8 (p 432 2M) (MvgnMr •*. No. M—»Ifr«JI (H» All Other Substances Without * Ceiling Limit. Employee exposure lo roiiri-nlr.ilioiii jbo\«- the PKL jh.ill be controlled so as lo prevent harmful eflr< Is surh as lurrosis. significant irritation of the eyes, skin or respirator) li.icl. or chronic or irreversible tissue change M»l \. SIH h -nbsl.Hires aff not known lu CJMV jdtrrst* r-OVrS if the nuiimuni eoneen- Ir.iliini ol ev|M>Mire is limited in jrrordjiire uilh the follow ing guidelines I'LL I .I/in- ' T.ibl,- A< I or AC-Jl OlO I >l lo 10 >m Miiltifjlir.ilii'ii h'.irlor A'or \l.i\iiiiiun (.'oiimitr.itioii 3 2 15 MM- |>pi» v-iliie mill's* the runrrnlcjlion it unl\ eiprosvrd in ing'M* (3) Ceiling Limits Employee exposures shall be controlled such thai the applicable ceiling limit specified in Table AC-I or AC 2 for any airborne Con I.mini.ml is not exceeded al any time. (rl> Skin Nnl.ihon The substances designated by "S" in the skin notation columns of T.ibles AC-I and AC 2 may be absorbed into the bloodstream through thr skin, the mucous membrances and'or the eve. and contribute lo ihr overall exposure Appropriate protective clothing shall be provided for and used b\ emplovees as necessary to prevent skin absorption \( )f I Tin- .ilx'M' lefimremenl duet nul remove the emplmer > responsibility lo provide .ippnipii.ilc clothing fur protection (ruin eorrosue or skin irritating mjleri.ils whit h nut nul LH-.II llif ' S design.ilion (<•> Workplace Monitoring (I) Win-never it is reasonable to suspect that emplovees mav be exposed to concentration', of airborne contaminants in excess of lev els permitted in Section 5l55ic). the emplover shall monitor (or cause lo have monitored) the work i-ii\iroiiinent so that exposures to emplovees can be measured or calculated (21 \\ hen exposures to airborne contaminants are found or are expected lo evcred allow able levels, measures to control such harmful exposures shall be instituted in accordance with Section 5141. (3i For thr adequate protection of emplovees. the person supervising di- recting or evaluating the monitoring and control methods shall be versed m this vl.ind.ird .ind sh.ill be competent in industrial hvgiene practice \(>ll In I M ilil.it>' Ihr drier I ion of conHiliom Irjdinp lu M-nom o\rmpo*nm the >< 1.1 IIIMI; ill llie «orl on\ imnmenl b\ JMV person julhoriirH l>\ the rnipln\n uviup .ipl>rn|iri.ili IIK .iMiriii); Hi-v irev. it rnroiiuped (• u. NO >4—»2»«)i (p 432 261) APPENDIX A Compulation for Exposures to Contaminants with Independent Health Effects The 8-hour time-weighted average concentration (TWA) of a single substance lo which an individual is exposed during a workday shall be calculated usine the following formula lo determine compliance with the PEL specified in Table AC-1, AC-2, or AC-3 = C.T. -r C,T, + . . . C..T. 8* Where T is the duration in hours of the exposure to a substance at the concentration C For multiple substances with independent health effects, an independent comparison of each TWA with the corresponding PEL shall be made to determine compliance. •NOTE tighl 18) is used js denominjlor regardless of loljl hours of unrkdj) t\ XMI'I.L To illustrate the use of this formula, assume iin employee is enposed lo •iirbornr toluene ul u ronmitrjlion of ISO ppm (ur 2 hours. 75 ppm fur 3 hours, jnd 50 ppm lor 4 hours during M S hour workdj). TWA = |(I50 x 2i -f (75 X 3) -I- (50 x 4)),8' = 91 ppm The series of exposures in this example are eouiv alent to an 8-hour exposure al a concentration of 91 ppm w hich is below the PEL value of 100 ppm specified for toluene by Table AC-2 To determine whether the excursion limit or the ceiling limit is exceeded, short lime samples al the highest expected concentrations must be taken If the duration of the exposures lo toluene between 200 and 500 ppm exceeds 10 minutes in one workday, the excursion duration is exceeded. Also, any em- ployee exposure lo toluene above 500 ppm is a violation of the ceiling limit D Computation for Exposures to Contaminants with Additive Health Ef- fects In the absence of information lo the contrary, the adverse health effects of ex|>osure to tvv o or more toxic materials during the workday shall be considered additive and the following formula shall be used for calculating D. the fraction of the allowable daily exposure D = PEL, TWA. PEL, TWAn PEL,, Where TW A is the lime w eighted av erage concentration of a particular sub stances involved m the exposure (as calculated bv the formula in Appendiv Al. and PEL ib ihe corresponding permissible exposure limit for that substance as specified b> Table AC-I, AC 2 or AC-3 The vaJue of D shall not exceed uml> Health effects for mullmle contaminants are not considered additive when different organs of the bom are affected bv indiv idual substances, or w here the same effect (such as narcosis) is produced bv two substances but the PEL for one substance is based on another effect For example, an exposure lo I ppm vni) I chloride would not add significantly to the narcotic effect of 100 ppm toluene, nor would 100 ppm toluene add to the carcinogenic effect of vinyl chloride image: ------- $5155 (p. 432.262) GENERAL INDUSTRY SAFETY ORDERS TITLE 8 (HoglMM M. No. 4— 1 »44| TABLE AC I PERMISSIBLE EXPOSURE LIMITS FOR CHEMICAL CONTAMINANTS Qienunl Atutitca RrYiitry \umber1" flui" J383968 75070 64197. IOS247 Ł7641 75058 $ U9S3 S 74862 540590 79276 79145 507*2 107028 79061 S 79107 1071)1 S > 309002 $ 1 ro * 0 107186 S 107051 10*23 S 2179591 1X0738 92671 $ HI 415 91598 504290 7773060 7664417 12125029 7773060 62*637 626380 62&) S I1Z7U9 " AW" Atuie', 0.0.0.0 left amethyl 0,0 ihiodi p-pheoylene phosphor othwale AceUldehyde Acetic Kid. KC Tible AC-t Accbc anhydride Acetone. KC Table AC-t Acelonitnle i-ActtyLaminoiluoreae, N fluoren lyl tcetimide, tet Secbon 5209 Acetylene Acetylene dichloride, KC 1,2-dicHloroethylene Acetylene letribiarode, 1,1 iJ letjabromoethane Acrtylrne letiachlonde, see 1.1.2,2 letiachlofoelhine Acervlsalicyuc acid (Aspirin) Acfolem AcryUmide Acrylic sod Acrylonitnle. KC also Section 5213 Aldnn. 1X3,4 IO,!aKeucrikxo-l.44a^A8a beuhyd/o-endo. U-eiChiWuDeUuAOnaphlhilene Allyl alcohol Ally! chlonde Ally! glyodyl ether ACE Allyl piopyl disulhde Aluminum, aliyls (not otherwise dasafied) Aluminum, soluble salts Aluminum metil ind oode Aluminum pyio powden Aluminum welding fume] Alundum |AI|0,|, corundum. KC Tible AC-1. nuisance parbculalei Ammodimelh|ilberuene. sec XyLdene 4-Aminodiphenyl, sec Sccbon 5209 f •Aminoelnanof, see Elhanolamme lAmmonaphlhikne. sec beta NaphthyUnune, Section 5209 i Anunopyndine Ammale '. Ammonium niUamile Ammorui Ammonium chlonde fume Ammumuin lul/arrule. Ammale n A/nyi Kclale KC Amyl anUte (ill iwmeis and nuituro) . i Aniline Amjidmc (oitSo tnd para lumirrtl Aiiliiiiun) 41. J cuiniiouiiilv u Sb Anliuiun> luuiidt. liAlidhlig fru.iiuo\r% f> ituounti n) 11 cud u( Tdttlr \l' 1 FEL^ Col- ppaiM mg/U"n io/" 10 too in i K C 40 70 (M 1 IS 5 01 OS OJ 10 30 t t3 OJ3 t 5 1 1 5 12 t U : '1 1 i 03 I ^ TITLE 8 |R»gi«t»i M, No Qtemicil Atatrjclt JJrffMfft \unibfi"1 JJjfl'kl 56U84 7440371 7784421 113221-4 MX8U62424 1912249 B6500 S UU526 S &Z1224 744U393 114261 17804352 71432 S 92X75 S 803fl3u6 71432 106514 100447 141662 92524 N42UI 1)04821 ' I30W62 ^ 16 10!ŁHii4 10 10 100 MO 125 670 tin 1U 01 03 03 03 7637072 314409 T7W*V> n«oz2 74973 744M 7i25! S 14(U« GENERAL INDUSTRY SAFETY' ORDERS PEL AW «™"' . ANTb, l-(rnaphlhyl|-2-lhiouTea, Banru. Haltraci Aquahn *. KC Acrolein Ai|(on lkl Anemc. and inorfianic uteruc compounds, (sec also Section 52141 Anemc, oriaruc compounds, is As Arnne. Alii, 005 Asbeflos (including arbnolile, imotile. anthophtllilr. chrywtur. ciociJoblf and tiemolilr). sec Sccbon S208 Asphalt (pcboleum) hunet Atiuine Aunphoi methtl. 0.0-dimelhyl S^(4-oio-l iVbtruotnaun 3(4H| ylmelh)!) phosphorodilhiule. Culhion' 13. AjobuisoburiTonimle decompourion product. sec Tetiamelhyl succinommle Aiodnn', sec Monociolophos Banum, toluble compounds, as Ba Baygon '. I isopiopoiyphenyl N melhykarbamale. Propotui Bcnomtl 08 Beniene. see Table AC 2 Bcniidine. 4.4 -diiminotuphrnyl. KC Section 5209 Benun. sec Petroleum diitJLlei Bcniol. sec bcniene, Table AC 2 p-Benioquinone. sec Quinone Beniovl pcioude, dibcnioyl pcroudr Beniyl chlonde alpKa-chloiololuene I Beryllium and beryllium compounds, sec Table AC 2 Bidnn*. KC Dicrolophos Biphenyl. diphenyl. phemlbeniene 0! Bisichloromelhyli elhei. see bis Chloiomelhyl ethei. sec Sechon 5209 Bismuth Itllunde Bismuth lellunde (Klemum-doped) Boialei. leha. sodium salts Anhydrous Dccahtdratc Penlahydiale Boion oode Boion tnbionude I Boron tn/luonde I ' B Biomine pcnlafluonde 0 1 Bromochloromethane. sre Chloiobiomorthane tiiumitelKine sec tlhyl bromide Bfoiniiforni mbrumoniellujir 03 BiixnamrUunr. %rr Methyl bronudr. Tiblr AC J J5155 (p 432263) u, Ceil aif'Hfn uig"' n i U J _ 001 Oi 02 j 10 Oi 05 05 10 5 i 15 10 i I 1 10 10 ) C IA IU n ^ VI 07 5 image: ------- f 5155 (p 432264) Ormial Aktnr* tm mt ift • ArfUDT yVWrr'" A." new 106990 106978 109795 71363 79933 II 1761 S 18864 105464 540MS 141322 71363 S •am 75650 109739 S II 1762 1 189851 S 142080 138227 109795 > 89723 S 1 ŁJ 98511 7440439 1306190 777*44 1 411341 156677 1306620 1305788 10101390 76222 106602 105602 2425061 S 63252 1563662 7440440 I24V8 75150 6300*) 5WIJ4 VtiV> S J5-M 351504 GENERAL INDUSTRY SAFETY ORDERS 1 » toot** mutiAunmuthiw Trilkui ""J~* J1'— 'Ju"j™n*. »* lnflUi.viuiUj.iuu«u l>Botadwne Buune 1 Butinethioi we Butyl merctptio 1 Butinol. KC • Butyl ilcohol t Butane; ve Methyl ethyl ketone 1 Butoiyethinot, Butyl Ollonlve • Butyl tcetile •t Butyl KtWe lert Butyl iceUte Butyl iciylate • Butyl ilcobot l-botinol «c Butyl ilrahol lert Butyl ilnhol But)Umine But)l Cettowlve. we t Butoiyethinol lert Butyl chionule. di left butyl ch/omite. it ClOi ••Butyl dycidyl ether. BCE, 1 butoiy t3-epoiyprop«ne n Butyl Ucrjlr. • Purvl mercaptn o-wc ButylpheraJ D-lert-ButyHofueiie Cadmium metil dirt, u Cd, we Tible AC t Cidmiuni. tduble ulb. u Cd. we Tible AC! Cadmium obde hunt, u Cd Ciloum iiwnile; we Anenie, moffink (we ibo SecrJo* 5214) Cilciuro rubonile. we Tible AC-3, numnct ptrtxrubla Cilciunt ryinuiude Cilciura hydiobde CJciumoude Cilnum gbnte, we Tible AC-3, nuiunre pvtKulilej Cunpha (lynlhetjc) Cipt oUctm duri Ciprobrtim iidr McgtaMrl ra. /*•»'•' 1^00 800 B 190 m 10 90 100 100 - B \ j It . - _ . I - 5 - ~ . 5000 01 t TITLES N. »+. 4-t««4| Ml V/V-B $> UOO IQQO • f^mf 710 00 950 190 C 300 IS C 01 C 133 fi JQ eo 005 C «3 5 - t u 1 V 01 I 5 01 33 1.000 14 B TITLE 8 |H»«i«t*f W. No .tb'lrjcl- frfiirn Aumfcv'" Sm IIII59 90TH146 II35I7>II 57749 S 8001352 S T782505 107 2UO 5J2274 79049 BrVMII S 74T5 75456 S34492I9 S 1 1097691 S 1066% 75003 107073 75014 67663 74873 I013W 542AM 100LU5 600i» 761 U 76062 I26W, S |j)liW» O^jtM C »1TO J 2S2IHH2 S 7440473 GENERAL INDUSTRY SAKETY ORDERS »4— l>le~UI 45155 (p 432 265) fEL li.4.77a lrtiah)dro-4.7- mflrunomdjnr Chlormalrd rimphene lotaphene Chlonnjird diphrnil oiidr Chlorine Chlorine dioiide Chlorine liilluondr Chlocoarelaldeh\de ilpha Chkxoafetophenone. phenaryl chloride Chlotcuretil chloride Chlorobrniene monochlorobeniene o-ChlorobrnnlioVw malononitriie OCHM Chlorobfomorlhane bromochloromrllunr 2Chloro^lAbuUdiene we Chloroprrnr Chknodifluoromelhanr flixxof jtbon 22 Chkxodiphenil i42~r chlonnri Chloiodiphrntl l chlocidf Srrhon 5210 Chloroform. Irichloromrllunr Chkxomrltunr we Mrlhil rhlonde Tablr U 2 Chlofometh\l methvl rlhrr we Mrtrul chloromrlhil elher. Sex r»on 520V bit fhlotomr (hv 1 ether we alto Ser hon 52W 1 Chloro-4 nirtobrniene wr p - \ilrixhloiobf n;rnr lOikxol nirroptopane Chroroprnlifluoioetrune CSIoiopicrui tnchloronirromrlhinr Chkwop'ene t-chloi»l J butjdirnf o-(~hloroMuenr o( hkrololuene t (hloro-6-(rnrhloromrlhtl|p\Tidinr \ Ser>-" C"hlorp>fifm Durtbjn* Chromium mrlal Chromium ill' compounds u ( t ('hromiiuD (Illi compounds at ( r ( hiomium |V|i com|KHindt 4* ( r V. 4lri tolublr Cr \ 1 com|>iund< Certain »)ln intnlublr ( i \ 1 compound! . - 1 01 01 1 005 005 75 005 20U 1.000 - - 10 OOUI 2 IOOU 01 10 50 50 2 05 05 05 3 03 04 3 «3 02 350 04 1050 3500 1 05 50 00)3 in 63211 07 45 2.1J 2.VI 10 02 05 05 05 005 005 C C C image: ------- {5155 (p 432.266) GENERAL INDUSTRY SAFETY ORDERS TITLE 8 (RcgltUr M. No. 4—1-2*-M| Atutricts Registry^ FŁL< itwlk Ai/nr'" I49T76I8 2971906 8007452 7440484 62748 7440506 I367OT Quomile ore processing (chiomale), u Cr Chromium, soluble ch/omic, chromous ulu, u Ci Chrornyl chlonde Qopidol, Coyden* Coal (Bituminous) dust see Table AC-3 Coal tar pitch volatile!'" CobaJl. metal fume and dust, u Co Compound 1080*. see Sodium fluoroacetile Copper metal fume, u Cu Copper salts, dusts and misU, u Cu Corundum |A),0,|, see Alundum Cotton dust (see also Secbon 5217) Coyden'. see Cbpidol Dai* herbicide, tee Sodium I (2,4^kKlorophenoiy)elhyl sJlate 0023 1 KJ M 1319773. 106394.' 95487. 106445 123739 299865 96828 420042 57125 460195 506774 110827 108930 iwwr IIO&38 IOH9I8 121824 542W7 2S7W3 94757 115913 50293 62737 17702419 78342 123422 Uu)W 1VH15 S S s s s s s s s Cretol (dl isomers) Crotonaldehyde, beta melhylacrolein Crulomale Cumene, isopropylbeniene Cyan amide Cyanide, u CN Cyanogen Cyanogen chlonde Cycloheune Cycloheianol Cycloheunone Cycloheiene Cycloheiylanune Cyclomle. BOX Cyclotnmcthylenetnnitranune Cyclopenladiene C^clopenlane 2.4 D. 2.4-dichloruphenoiyacelic acid, Weedone* 638 Dasamt*. see Feruullolluon DDT. 1,1.1 tnchloroU bis (p-chlorophenyl)ethane DDVP. see Durhlorvos Decaborane Delruv*. see DioialKion Deinelon. a nuiluie ol OOilieuSil 02|elhtll)uo)ethvl phoifilioiottuoale and O.U -dielliyl S 2|elhyllluo)elnyl phuiphorutliioale. Syslot* Ducclone aliohol. 4 ht>lioi>-4 niritiyl 2 pcnUnone 1 2 Uiuiuiiot-Oi iiit ler Klliylentnli^iiiiiic • Uuimon 00-dicOifl i> 12 ty>propyl^nielhyl- 005 05 Oil 10 01 01 Oi 1 t _ JO _ - 10 03 300 SO 25 300 10 - 75 600 - - 005 001 30 t 5 U5 I i 20 06 1,050 200 100 1,015 40 15 200 1,720 10 1 03 01 240 CtJ- 4 pM 01 TITLE 8 IfUgiiKf U. .ibitucli .\umbrr'" SI 3MM3 94360 IWC457 30U765 9612* 75616 IOtt.34 102418 I07b64 »4742 75722-W 95JOI IOM67 91941 75718 IIW25 75343 I07U62 75J54 S4U39U 111444 7S4J4 75IN2 5W7& 7HK75 542756 7j(wu 42737 141662 SI24XJI 77736 I02.V4J 60571 III42J \(HHf. H1I17S 103111 111*11 6UV7 *ŁŁ 75616 No s s S S S S S S s s GENERAL INDUSTRY SAKETY ORDERS M—t- 2MJ| PE \W Diaiomelhjne Dibenio)! peroiide. >er Benio>l peioude Diborane Dibrom*. naled OfrdimelhilO-lU-dibromo- 2J djchbioelh)li phosphate 1 1 Dibromo-3-chloiopropane. DBCP. lee Section 5212 Dibromodinuoromelhane ut Dilluorodibromomelhane 1,2 Dibiomoeltunr. sec tlhvlene dibiumide. Wlion 5219 2 iDibulilammolelhanol Dibulvl phosphate Dibulil phltulale Dirhloioaceh lene frDichlorobrnirne p-DiihluroU-niene 1 4 Dichloiobeniene ire Table \C2 3.3 Dichlorobeniidine. 4,4 •dianuno-3.3 -dichlorobiphentl tee Section 5iW Dirhloiodifluoromeirune see Table AC 2 1.3 Dichloro-5.5 dunethtl htdanloin I.I Dichlarorlhane UDichlorelhane see Elhi lene dichlondr Table AC 2 I.I Uichloruelhvlene. see Vmilidene chlonde \1 Uichloroelhxlene acet\lene dichlonde Dichloiuelhvl ether. bis(2 chloroelhvl. etber Dichloronuoromelhane. Flurocarbon 21 Dichloromelhane see Melh)lene chloride Table \C 2 1 1 Dichlorol nilioelhane \1 Dichloiopropane see prop\lene dichlonde Dichloiopiopene 2J Dichloropropionic acid U DichloioletiaTiuororlhanc. Fluorocaibun 114 DicMorioi (DD\ Pi, 12 d.chloroviml dunelhtl phosphate Vaponi* Dicrolophos Bidnn* DiC)cluhei\lmelhane-44 -duhtcyanale see Melh)lene bii (4-c)clohfi)lisoc)analel D,c,clupentadiene Diculopenladieml iron Dieldnn li.34 IO.IOhe»achloro-6.7-epuu I44j56 7.8.hj-ociahidr» 1 .4 endo-eio-S 8-dimelhanonaphlhalene Oielhaiiolafiune DiethvLnune 2 iDieilulammolelhanol 1 4 Dtelhtlene dioude see p Dioiane Dirlhil elher. set- elhil elhei l)i l2rlh>lhn>ll phlrulalr trr l)i src orr>l uhlhaJale II,, -cli) 1 l,k,iu- Dicthtl pturijjir dibioniu image: ------- 15155 (p 432268) Ofourtl Ayu/rt AumArr'" An* 142061 221*0 123319 IOB&M 106189 108203 KWT) ID9) 114401 60117 I300T36 I2I67T I3303T I08MS 30076) 68122 )7I4T 61641 •t» 62TJ9 1 K> I3III1 UP 777SI ED454S S2ASO IOKM U4S?I IVOI6 121 142 12391 1 78JU 925i4 1223* lOIWi 12319) 2"?M~JS fJSuC M7ii7 97778 2WM-I I1M7II 3.yi>)i S S S s s s s s s s s s GENERAL IMHiSTRV SAFKTV ORDERS TITLE 8 mft *4i FLL AW ppn,"' Wolilin'. wr Citxi/ol DulvrwM rthn . OCL b«l2 3-rpoiypiopyll ether 0 1 t>Dih>dr«)beniene. wr htdioqumonr Diuobur\l krtonr. lWimeth>l-Hwpljnonr B DutopropyUnine ) Dmoptopvl rthef. wr hoprocnl ether DimelhofMnnhuw. wr MrltulJ DunethvUrelunidr 10 Dunrlhtbmine 10 4-Dunr(h«Ummo*ioi>rnime. ur Srrtwn )209 Dunrth)Ununobrnirnr. wr Xilidinr K,\ Durirlhtluuline. dimrlh> Iphrnt luninr ) Dunrlhi Ihrnirnr wr Xtlenr, Tiblr AC 2 l>DvnrthilbultlKrlilc wr wr Hn>l trrtilr OjlXDunrlhtlO-llj-dibrornot2-dirhloiarlh»li phoiphalr wr Dibrom' \\Dimrllulfonruiiudr. DMF 10 i6-Dimrthtl-4-hrpt>none. wr Dutobut)! krlonr I.I Dunrlh>lhidiuine 0) DrnirlU know we Arrtanr. TiMr AC 2 N.\ Dunrthtlmnoumine. wr \ Nitiowdimrlhvliminr Srrtwn 5209 Dvnrthtl phUublr Dimrth)! uUite. meth)l tul/jli- 0 1 Dvutrobrnirnr (ill uomritl 01) 46-Duutio-» U 6-dimrrophrnol 35-Dinitio-ololuuriidc. Zojlt-nr* t4-Duutrotolurnr pDwunr trih frtdr l.4-dioiar)tlohrunr 1 4^Jirthilrnr aioudr B Dwtjltuon Drlnj>* Diphrml wr HiphrnJ Diphrm UiTunr \ phrn> Unilinr Diphrn\ Imrlhinr anwf unjlr wr Mrthilrnr Ui ipfinivlnor\in4tri Diprup>l krtunr Si Dipiopilrnr |Urol monomrlh\l rlhrp M> 1 Diquil l.r-rih\knr 2i bipitidmium dibmmidr Di vrr ortil phlruljlr bn<] rth\lbrit|iulilluUlr Diiulnijn, Diiullnlon dmilon* Oftdirllnl S 1 irlh\llhiuirlli>l phmphoitidilhiiuti JMlMril buhl purwjl [)iut(in Lfil mf tf'n g,f»' 0) 1)0 10 35 18 B 30 1 J 0) 1 02 j 1 } 90 02 in lli 6(l> TITLE 8 GENERAL INDUSTRY SAFETY ORDERS |N««teur M. M*. 4— 1-»««| OkaarW Atatncti K A^KS1" i I08S76 BSISS 9+4229 1141)348 11)297 TBD8 106898 210464) 7SMB U6)2) 78840 7)081 (417) 14143) K3I22 11060) 1111)9 141786 14088) 6417) 7)047 MI85) 100414 74964 106354 7M03 748)1 107073 1071)3 106934 107062 1072 II 1 01211 628966 nom I09N64 Oi ] 110496 ) 2 1)1564 III 10 10 S s s s s s s s s s s s s s s AW" Divtnrl beazene Dovthenn A. we rhenyl ether-diphenyl auitwc Dunfatn'i we OJwopyri/M Dyfanite'.KtFanafoi Emery, we Tible AC-3, nubmrr ptrtioJiln Endosutftn, Thwdin*. 6,7W.IO.IOh«uchloco.|3J«.6, 3-oode Endrin, liJ,4,IO.IO-heuchlori>4.7-epoiy-l,f4O.(,7jUt- ortihydro- 1 ,4-endo-nKk)^Alrnr dibramidc. M-dibtonxwlhuw, we Srrtwn 5219 Elh)lrne dirhlonde. IJI-dKhJoroelhine. wr Tibk AC I Elhylrne gtyrol (putmiUln) Elhylrne |lyml (yipor) Elhylnw flyral dinitiilr Dhylrne glyrol manorlhyl ether, wr iDhoiyrlhutal Elh)lrnr |lyrd aionofnrlhyl rlhei. wr 1 Mrlhoryrlhanol Elh)lrnr (lyral monamelhyl ether irrtilr, mrlhyl rrOotolve •ccljlf . 2 mclhoryflhyl trrlilr Elh)lr nruiunr . rthylriuminr. irr tlw Srrhon )2H9 ff""' 10 - 1 (M 3 JO 400 \fOO 10 B 100 m JO 1.000 1 10 _ 90 00) B 0) «jS155 (p. 432.268> I* mg/H» $"' 01 01 10 0) 1 04 IK no 1.400 JO 1.900 18 130 43) 890 230 2,600 J C B 10 IB C 03'" 120 1 VM; |)\ll fr \ N DimrlhillornuiniHi IIVIII wr I I Dirnrllultndl^ll" image: ------- ^5155 (p 432270) ChrniicjJ .\b\lijfl- .\tvnber'" Sim' IOW44 7V343 16219753 75061 78933 100743 S 76104 IIMI3 SSAfi I44M64I 12604509 14806607 77H24I4 75694 > 75718 1 75434 to 75456 76120 76131 GENERAL INDUSTRY SAFETY ORDERS |H*gi*t«r U. PEL " Aj/iir'" PP'T1" ' Elh>lrnroudr 10 ElUrlhri 400 Elhvl loimalr 100 •Elhvlidrnr chlondr. trr I.I Dichluiorthanr Elh) lidror norbomrnr i Elhxl mncapun rlhuiflhiul 05 Elh)l mrlhvl krlonr. trr Mrlhvl rlhvl krlonr S Elh| Imorpholinr, 4-tlhvl 1 4 lrtiah>diooujinr 5 Elhv 1 ulicalr. Irnarlh) 1 ulicalr 10 FrmuUolhton. Daunil f million Fribam frnw \.\-dimrlhillhiocjibamalr. Frrmalr* Frnot anadium dull Fibioui flail trr Glut Fluondr u F - Fluonnr 1 Fluoiocaibon II. trr Tnchlorofluoiomrlhajir Fluoiof jrbon 12. trr Oichlotodiflooiomrlhanr Tablr AC 2 Fluoiocaibun 21 trr Dichloionionofluoiomrlhanr Fluoiucaibon 22 trr Chloiodifluoromrlhanr Fluoioraibon 112 irr I.IJiTrtiachloro-l .2 difluororlhanr Fluoiocaibun 113. trr l.li Tnchloio-l.2.2 trifluoiorlhanr. TITLE 8 . No. M— HO-MI id. CeJ ng'\l'n ing'*' 20 I.2UO 300 15 C 1 23 01 10 1 25 2 JOUi 75127 64186 IV»W>2 9«i!l SBIJUI Tablr AC 2 Fluoiocaibon 114 trr 12 Dichloiolrliafluoiorlhanr 756V4 Fluoiomchloioflirllunr trr Tnchloiofluoiomrlhanr Tablr AC 2 S Fonotui - 01 FormaJdrhvdr 2 1 Foimamidr 20 30 FomiK acid i 9 fitorn' irr Fluoiocaibon) (uiadan* trr Caiboluian S tuifuial 2 6 S fuiluivl alcohol 10 40 Catolmr 300 WO Crnnanium Irliahvdndr 02 06 CUn htiuui 01 'dun i < 7|im in diamrinl trr Tablr Al 3. nuiuncr (uiliculalrt CluUialdrhvdr 02 07 Cl>crnn nnvl trr Tablr AC 3. nuiuncr paihculalrt Clvndul 23ru«;iv I nropannl 25 75 Clviol niouubuivl rlhri trr 2 Huioivrlhaniil Gl)i(jl inuniirlhvl rlhri trr 2 Klliiiivrlhanol Clvjul niouoiiirtlivl rllirl wr 2 Mrlhuivrlhajiul Cia(>hilr Ifi^luial) trr Tal>ir AC 3 Ciaptutr (v>nllirh(). irr Ijblr A(' 3. nuiunrr pjrtitulaln 77D2652 III7U \\Mft ll»V>t TITLE 8 (fUgutcr U. No ChfmicJ Abtturtt Aumirr'" Sim'" 66.VIO IJ397245 7440i* 8JJIWI 7440597 76441 S ICM5 76hM 77474 67721 S I3J5K7I $ 6MI62 8221160 110543 »I706 IOMOI 100649 107415 302012 S IOOJM06 7647010 7490ft 7664393 1333740 10035106 7647010 74**JK S 76M393 771!MI "M"T3 77vJIN Iilll9 9W.II S 95316 755J5U 7M7d 4UV.71U. IJtKJTI IMhMJb GENERAL INDUSTRY SAFETY ORDERS fa. AW Cuthion*. trt Aimphot mrlhvl C)ptum calcium lulfalr dihvdulr let Tablr AC 3. nuiuncr (url.culjln Hafnium HOI trt hruinclhvlrnr dntooarulr Hrl.um Hrplarhloi. 1.4.567 8D-hrplachloiol..477a Irtiahtdio- 4.7 mrlhjnotndriif n Hrplanr Hrtachlotobutadirnr Hr iachlof or\ cloprnladirnr llriachloiorthanr peichJoiorlhanr HruchloioiuphlhaJrnr Hnifluoioacrlonr. I.I.I J J J-hr uAuOfo-2 piopanont Hriamrlh; Irnt dntorvaiulr HOI n Hrianr olhri itomrn ! Hrtanonr. trr Mrth\l bulvl Lrlonr Hrtonr ttr Mrlhvl itobuivl krlone trc Hr«v| jctlalr 4 mrlhvl 2 ptnlyl actlalr. l^dinirlhil bulil arrlalr llrivlrnr {Kcul H)draj.nr Hidiobiomcc and trr Htdrogrn bromide Hidiochlofic acid trr Htdrogrn chlondr Hidiociamc icid trr Htdiotrn oanidr Hidiofluonc icid. u HF trr H)diogrn fluondr H>droprn Htdro^rnalrd trrphrntlt Htdiotrn bromidr. it HBi ll>drofirn chlondr u HO munatir acid llvdru^rnctinidr ai IIC\ Htdio^rn fluondr. u HF H> dioprn prioudr (90^ ) . u H,0, Hidiuyrn trlrmdr H.V H\dioern tulfidr. trr Tablr AC 2 llidiuqu.nonr 1.4 brnirnediul Hvdiuivpropvl acivlalr Indrnr Indium and compound* as In Inril dun trr nuiuncr painculaln lodinr. AS Ij luilulorm II'DI trr Itouhuionr dnsortinalr liun unjc* funir liun prnlacarb'iiiil as f r Ifufi uht loJublr. v Ir »«'" , ikt - 400 002 001 1 01 002 50 500 50 25 01 ih> 05 3 J 10 3 1 005 - 05 10 _ 01 06 _ 01 45155 (p 432.270.1) Cnl mg W*n in/" 05 . 05 1600 024 on 10 02 07 014 C 160 1.8ft) 300 125 C 01 - 5 10 7 C II C 2 15 02 2 3 50 01 1 C 10 i 08 1 image: ------- f 5155 (P «2J Ormml Abitrjrl- Ar/li/ri \imtnw 11392 II15I3 1 10190 78SJI 18957216 78591 409TI9 109)91 108214 (7630 T3JIO 64J2S7 lOUUJ 40I6IC 11)23*; 461514 I67-5I77S If ' 'MB W '"4I 1/1 I3057M 1317653 7SW6T8 irnom 1)09444 121755 IO&5I6 1(779651 IOI68H IOJ*T?1 141797 79414 CENER4L INDUSTRY SAFETY ORDERS TITLE 8 f* ^' 4N««<«<*r to. MO. M an»av» ftt'4' O™1*' • in •*"' Aj/nr '" Itoafml acrtalr. Imrthtfcutyl acrtalr luaiml alcohol. lmrth>lbuianol Iwburtl acrtalr I-mrlhtlpioptl acrtalr - lnbu»> 1 alcohol. 1 nxlh) lp> opanol lu»cl>l alcohol bophoronc. 3.3.3-tTvnrth)12-cyTloKrienr-l-onf S Iwphoronr duwrvanalr. IPDI Iwpiopoiyrthanol Itootocnl arrtalr 1 topi 001 1 alcohol IwpiocnUminr S Mioprop\Uiuhnf Itopioptl rlhrt, duMprop)) dhn Iwprotnl |l>nd>l tthrt. ICE. 1.2-rpoiy luopropoi)ptopanr kaolin, trr Tablr ACJ. nunancr ptrbculaln Irlrnr. tlhrnonr UnnalrVirt Mrthonul Uad anrnalr. m SKlwm 5214 and 5116 Uad chronulr. ai Pb |«c* aba Srctxm 32l6i Uad ImrlaUic) and moifanic compoundi. oust and (un*. ai Pb Itrr abo Sectxm 31l6i Uad irnarlhyl. wt Trttarlh)! lead Uad irnamrlhti «r» Trtiamrlhyl lead Lunr XT Calcium oodr Lamnlonc. calcium carbonalr. w* Table ACO nuiuncr parorulalri S LanoUnr. I1J 4 j.6-h(uchlororyTV)rieunt. |imnu nonvi LjlKium htdndr L P C . kqurTird prtrolruni gu Mapralr. magnraiam caibonile. irr Tablr AC 3, nuiuncr parnrulaln Marnrnum oodr (umr. ai Mi S Malalhion 0. O-dimrlhOS-llj-dx-aiborthonrdiyll phmphofodilhioalr C^hionV Ml T' Malric anhtdnde. m oulmfdioif anh|rdndr Minganrv and rompoundi. ai Mn Man^anrw hunr. u Mn S Manfanrw. C)clofjrnl*dxn>l rncatbon)! as Mn Manfanrw Irtiood* Maiblr calcium caiborulr. let Tabtr AC 3. nuiuncr parhcubln MDI irr Mrlh)lrnr bii |phrn>l uocyanalrl S Mritui) alkil rornpounas r Hf tn Tablr AC 2 Mrirun all lonpt rirrpl all tl rompoundi u Hg KT Tablr Mrtit)lrnr wr 1 JMnmcthilbrnirnf Mnil>londr 4 mrlhvl Jprnlrne 2-onc Mrlhjrr>li( and .. *•» PP"> 100 100 ISO 50 so 5 101 B BO 400 } I BO JO 05 _ _ - 1000 _ - 013 _ _ - . AC 2 13 |0 «gw'-n ffi' DO 160 700 ISO 270 B C 009 105 sso 980 12 10 LOGO 140 09 005 005 03 0025 1.800 10 in I J C I 01 1 60 70 74S1I Urlhanr MrlKanrlluol XT MclM mrirapljn TITLES 4H*g»t»r au. NO. CJtrmml HrfHtn \umbft"* flw'kl C7J6I 16752775 S 72415 I(WM S 1104% 150765 793>< 74997 46113 $ I26%7 S I09KT5 67561 74195 1*112 II04JO 1(0,10 ^ 95i34 7M» 39I7N6 S 1104^ 74873 7I5SS 107)02 7505S I08ST2 I56394J VOWfc S 111*113 S 8K20TC S 101 144 S 3l.'4jn| lOlWv. 7509? GENERAL INDUSTRY SAFETY ORDERS »» ti»m « \trnf'" ffw"' Mrltunol wr Mrlhvl alcohol. Table AC 2 MrlhormL Linnale* Mrlhoochloi. I.I l-tnchl«o-l4bu(p-mrthoi)phrn\li ethanr . Maiulr*. Moor* t Mrlhonrihanol. Mrthil Crlknolvr B 2 Mrlhonrthvl jcrlalr. trr Elh)lrnr fl)col monomrlhtl rlhri arrtalr 4-Mrlhonphrnol Mrlhtlarrlalr W> Mrlh>lacrltlror. pfopriw 1.000 Mrlhtl Krtilrnr pfocudirnr muluir MAPP 1.000 Mrlhvl acrtlalr 10 alpha Mrlhklarnlonilf Or 1 Mr(h>UI dimrlhonmrlhanr I.OX Mrlhvl alcohol mrihinol. trf TabW AC 2 MrlhtUmmr 10 \lrlh\l ami) alcohol trr Mrthil uobulil ca/binol Mrthvl n aiml arlonr t hrplanonr SO S MrlhtlaniUnr nwno-inrlmUnilinr 05 »Mrlhtlanibnr irr o-Toluidmr Mrlh.l btomidr. trr Tabk \C2 Mrth\ 1 bulil arlonr 2 nrunonr S MrlhtlCrllowlvr trf 1 mrlhoi\rlhinol Mrlhil OllowKr acrtalr tet Elhvlrnr fKrol n-,onomrlhil rlhri KTijIf Mrlhtlchlondr trr Tablr AC 2 Mrthtl chlorolorm I.I 1 tnchlotorlhanr MT Tablr AC 2 Mrlhil chloionirlhtl rlnre. XT Srrhon 520!* Mrlh>l namdr XT acrtomtnlr Mrlh\l 2<>anoacr>lalr 2 Mrlhilnclohrianr 400 Mrlh>lc>clohrianol imrla and paia iiomri muturr' 30 «.Mr.h,lc.clohrunonr SO 2 Mrlhilcicloprnladirml mjnfjnrw tncarbonil ai Mn Mrlhvl drmrlon a miiruir olOftdimrlhil 0-l2 irlhillluo rlh>l phoiphoiolhioalr and 00-dunriM S i2 irlh>lihio< rlhili phxnphoicHhioalr 44 Mrthvknr biiii-chloiaanilinri XT alw Scrhon 5215 Mrthi Irnr bi> . 4« rlohrrv livori u\ air i h> diofrnilrd MDI 001 Mrlhilriir bciiphrmliionanilri Ml>l diphrn>lnirlhjnr djnnr>anj|f 00? Vlrlhilrnr cKlondr dichloiomrttunr XT Tiblf \l 2 tsiss (p 4322703) •vrW"1 IS 10 80 5 610 1.650 1.800 IS 1 3100 12 115 2 20 f> I60I> 215 2JO 02 05 001 on 02 1 c c image: ------- J5155 (p. 432.27 Atxtnctt Hfguoy Kutabei"' . 101779 78333 1338234 107313 60344 748*4 iiom 108112 108101 624&J9 363804 74931 80626 298000 107879 681849 96839 t, T™ •? 7786347 to 6921224 100618 60344 1 10918 7647010 MX80303I7 91203 134127 91948 63252 2333I2A4 7440019 963122 13463393 7440U20 MIIS 7KT7372 101024)9 GENERAL INDUSTRY SAFETY ORDERS TITLE 8 '0.4) (N*Qlit*r M. No. 4— 1-2»4M) Sbfl"' A'*™"1 S 4.4' Methylene diuuluie. MDA Methyl elhyl kelone, MK1, 2 buUnooe. ethyl methyl ketone Methyl ethyl kelooe pnoode Melhyl (oraule S Melhyl bydiuwe, monomethyl hydiuine S Melhyl iodide Melhyl iscumyl ketoae S Methyl uobutvl arbuiol, tmelhyl-2-pentiaol. methyl iroyl ilcohol Methyl isobutyi ketoae, Heiane S Methyl uocyinile Melhyl uopiopyl ketone Methyl meicaplui Methyl metlucTyUle, methyl troethyt-2 propenoite S Methyl puithion. 0.0-dunethyi * (p-mtropheoyl) phosphor ottuaale Melhyl piopyi kelone, ipenUnone Methyl nJialc, Utiunethyl alicile •IptuvMethyUtyrene. 1 methyl- l-phenylelheoe Methyl fuUale. see Dimethyl ml/ale Mevuphoj. let Phosdno' Mica, jee Tible AC-3. nuiunce putmUles Mmetil wool fiber, tee Tible AC3, nuiunce putcuUla Molybdenum, insoluble compounds, is Mo Molybdenum, soluble compounds, u Mo Monoaotophos, Ajodnn* Maoamethyluulme, set N Melhyluuliae Monoroethylhydiuine. see Methyl hydruine S McxpnoLne, letr*hyd/o~4)l l.4~oiuine Murubc sod, u HO, see Hydiogeu chkmde Nded. set Dibtom* Niphlhi, coil In NiphlKUene ilpu NiphlhyUnune. 1-uphlhyUnune, see Section 3209 belt Niphthylimme. 2-niphlhylanune. see SerUoo 32D9 1 Naphlhyl N luethykubiniile, see Ctibuyl Naphlhilene dusocyarute. NDI Neon Nulale', stt tlhion- Nickel cubonyL Ni(CO), Nickel meuJ, u Ni Nickel, uuoluble compounds, u Ni Nickel, soluble comuoundi. u Ni S Nicotine, 1 roethyl-i(3-pyndyl) pynokdine Nitric acid Nitnc oudc. NO ff"W 01 200 02 100 Oi 1 90 23 90 002 200 03 100 _ 200 1 90 90 001 - _ » 100 10 001 (fc) 003 _ . . 0079 2 29 •v/v0 Oi 980 13 290 OJ3 10 240 100 203 003 705 1 410 Oi 700 i 240 240 01 10 3 OS 70 400 90 0063 039 1 1 01 03 9 U y* C C C TITLE 8 |R*anl*i U. No ( Tic mirj \umk-r"1 Sim"" I01UI6 S -- 9W53 S '"ill S 79241 772:3:9 10102440 71R1M2 5J6JO S 7551S I«6U3"2 79469 6T59 1121126 8ST22 9W90 S 761162 • |(Jtv24Ti UltU2 2ZJ4I3I S III&59 2U6I6I2U I4462T 77S14IT inOiMJ6 KiHTi; I9IMJ3 S 9WS.' S CENtRAl. INDUSTRY SAFETY ORDERS PL A.i/iir1" pSilioamline Kiiiobrniene p-Niliochloiobeniene Uhloio-4 niliobenienr 4 Nitiodiphenvl iee Section 92U9 Nilioeltunt Siliojien Ninogen diondr Niliofen lelioude. \|0. tee \iliOjjrn djonde Nitrogen Iruliunde KiliogKrrnn \momelhane 1 Aihopiopane 2 Xinopiopjnc \SitiowounelhiUmine iee Section 52t>9 Niliololuene Nilrotnchlofomeihane. see chloiopicnn Nitiout o>ide N|0 \unane Nuiunce dulls and paihrulalei vt Table U 3 Octarhloioiuphlhalene Ociane Oil imincfali mill parnrulale Oil dfffljblci muli teirepl railui ruhru nul 01 umilai irritant oiU.. see Table \C-3 nui^nre pjrdculalrt Oif jnu uxnu compuundi vt \iiemc. oiganic Ounium lenoude ai Oi Oialic acid 0»gen difluonde Ounr ParjfTin i*aA funtr Pauqual lolal pailirulalet Paralninn OOdielhil 0 ipniUophirnl phoiphniolhiojir Parhculalr polvoclic aromalir hidrurarboni il'PUl' ppm'" 1 " 100 Ihl 3 10 005 IOU 25 25 2 ihi 2)0 - - 3UU - OOU>2 . 005 01 - - - (P 432 ildl «*«/"> 3 9 1 310 - 6 30 05"' 230 90 90 II - 1.050 - 01 1450 9,i. ODD: 1 01 02 2 05 01'" 01 45155 1.270.5) M V" C at tx-nirnr 01 rvrlohrunr tolubln trr ( oal ui pilch tolahlet 8:«v5 S I96J4JJT I32lh4» i s:Khj s PI H MTC'hloiixJiphrixl PIP vt Penlachlorophenul Prnlaboianc* Penlai hlorunj(jhlhjlrnr PniljrliluiuphiMiol Pi P banlubnlr' 0005 _ - 001 05 05 iludfiuinielhtlinieihjiic Iriu iiirthvloliitrlhuhr wr ]jblr U J Prnluir Ittkl image: ------- 1*5155 GENERAL IMH'STH* SAFETY OHI (p 4327706; OnwrV trfutri ,\u/ttoff JK//I \4/nf * 107879 iriS4 394423 7616946 108952 S 92M2 - S I06J03 S 101 SW 100425 I12WI inwo s IOB9V O8JI1 88KT S 77K34T S 75*45 > 7KU5I2 1 76MVC! M TTi)l40 ~^ IOtfi>'T3 lUtMWl I3I44Q] 7119122 8M4S 62tlo I9IWI (Cvrtl S I4A13 83KI 10014:61 lltHA ! Pealanone wr Melhil proptl lelone Perrhlofarlhane. trt Heixhlororlhane Perrhkxorllulene wr Table AC 2 Perrhloiomelh)! metcaplan tnchlofomelhanelhio) Peirhlortl fluonde. OO,F Peilile. tee Table AC 3 Phenol Phenolhuune dibeniolhuiine p-Phen>lenrdiamine rhen>l elhet vapot Phentl rlhet-dipnentlieulertic muturel. vapot Phenvlelh)lene. tee Sltiene Table AC! Phen>l rl)nd>l elhei PCE 1 j-epoii-l^phenoiipropane Phenilhtdialine Phentl metcaptan Phenilphcnphine Ptmale. Thunet' 00~dnlh)l S^ieth)llhioimelh\l phoiphotodiihtoale Phoidnn Meiuiphoi*. J-tirbomrthon 1 p»oprn2\l dunelhil phoiphale Phoicene rarbonil chtoooV COCIi PUphine PH, PhoiphfllH Kid Phoiphofui. )ello« Phmphmoui oi>rhlonde Phoiphoim penlachlonde Phoiphofut penluulnde. P|St Phoiphorui Inrnlonde Phlhalir anhvdnde m Phlhalodinitnle Pickxam Tendon" Picnc and 2 4 6-trwinophenol Pipeiume duSidiochloiide Pital' Ipnalil IJ-indandione Plulei of Pl JroM 2piop>n I ol brl< Piopioljrlonf wr Wlion S2W Pioptoiut Kid Piopoiuf vr Bj\gonb n PiupJ aieialr n Pio[nl al(uln>l JOO 21(1 MO 500 TITLES (Review M. N*. Oamial Autncta Kumbn"' Sto** 1 19071 78871 10798! 75558 S TSSffl 627IJ4 74997 8003347 1 10861 106914 I!I8J4 (08463 7440166 B9841 0794 1308171 7783791 63251 7440311 40921! 7803623 7440224 16628228 7631906 136787 62748 S 131073! 7681574 9005258 780351) 8052413 37249 100425 I39S2I7. 9014011 37501 GENERAL INDUSTRY SAFETY ORDERS re. AW" j*»»"' Prop** Propylene feUoride. l^oWJoropropane 7) Pnpyiene glycol duiittale PGDN 10! Propylene fjytol nonomdhyl etho 100 Piopyleneimine, t-methyUnridme ! Ptopylene oode, 1,1-epoiypfopane •> n Propyl ratiale B Propyne. lee Mdhrlatttytenr Pytelhrwi Pyndine 1 Quuwne II RDX. «* Cytfcnite Renrcinol N Rhodium, mill liuoluble cwnpoundt, M Rh Soluble talU. u Rh • 1 A A .1;,.. ik. 1 A I* 1 1 1.,'. klniiMiliHti.il ntmmKmJtMn*!* namef, oj^duneinyl Hl4>4iiin»oiuji«nyi| umimmNnoMe, Koilan'. Trolene*. Nanko.' Roan rare nldet, pyiolyw products, it (onnaldeh)rde Rotenone, commercial douce, itt Table AGO, maoancc parhrulale* Rubbei nJvtnl (Naphtha) 400 Soaprtm, M Table AC-1 Selenium compound^ a Se Sekniura heianuoride IO& Seim'. tee Cuban) Sibca. tee Table ACJ Sdiron, tee Table AC-1, amonx nutm-Wa Sibran caibide. SiC lee Table ACJ. ouiunre ptrbcubto Silicon lettahydnde; auane 15 Silver metal, u A| SJvti, loluble rompoundt, • A| Sodnnuide II Sodium bisulfite jouium a,T-oxTHOfopnenoajTtnyi Hiiaie, ui( wiMLiur • Sodium fluoioaceUle. Compound 1080* Sodium kydroode, auitic nda Sodium meubuulfile Starch, M Table AC-1. Buiunrt partiruUla Sbbine.SbH, 01 Stoddaid nlvcnl I0n Strychnine Styrrne(nionomef), phefiyiriliylrne. tec Table AC 1 SoUJinm (u puie cryrtuline ptoteolytic enr)ine>) Surroie. ire Table AC-1, nimanre partirulatei (p. 432 nr/W* 390 180 J 90 110 3 13 04 43 1 II 1001 HI 01 1 1.600 11 04 IT II 001 01 3 10 006 i 3 03 323 015 0(01% t»l» &' c c c image: ------- {5155 (p 432.270.8) OtemiaJ Alatncti JlfguOy A'umArr"1 JJhn(kl 7446095 (551624 7664939 ld025679 1714227 7783600 2699798 8065483 93765 7440257 1314610 78308 384849 3689245 S T783804 •p 107493 S 1 K> 7W76 oo 76119 76120 79045 S 127184 5805 IJ15SC 3689245 78002 S 107493 109999 75741 S I 15775 J333S26 S 137268 509148 7722885 479458 S S I09W9 2SMC2 9bttfi iiszn 68111 GENERAL INDUSTRY SAFETY ORDERS |H»eUt» J AW Sulfur dionde Sulfui heu/luonde Sulfunc tod Sulhit monochlande; S,C1, Sulfur pentiJIuonde; SiFit Sulfur lebiiluonde Sulfuryl fluoride. SO.F, Syiloi, we Demelon' 1,4.5-T, 1,4,5-trichlorophenoiyicetic tod Tile, nonwbestiform, we Title AC-3 Tile (fibroin, non-fibroui, nurture!); we Tible AC-J. abctta Tuiujlum meUl durt. u Ti TinUlun oode dill, u Ti TCP, trident pr.osphilt, we Triorthacreqrl photphile TDI, we Tolueije-i,4-diuocyiiule TEDP, letiiflhyl dilhionopyrophasiihile Teflon', decoropaahon product! Tellurium ind compound!, u Te Tellurium heziJIuonde TEPP. letriethyl pyiophocphile. ICilmite 40*. Vtpotone* Terphenyb I.IX^Tetiibromoettune, we Acetylene letiibcooude l,I.UTetiicnloro-l>dii1uoroel>ane I.IU TetncKloro-l^dJIuofoethine, (luorocmrbon 111 I.IA2 TetrichloioelKine; tcetylene letitchlonde Tetrtckloroelhylene, we Peicnloroethylene, Ttble AC-t Tetrirhlorometlune, we Cuban letnchlonde, Tible AG1 TetitchloiOfuphlhiJene Tetriclhyl djlluopyrophaiptule; vx TEDP Tetnethyl lead, tdiielhylplumbtne, u Pb TetrieUivl pyrophoiphile. we TEPP Tetrahyoioturin TebuneuSyl lead, lefrimethvlplumbane, u Pb TebunelhyloliDethuie, we PenUerytlmlcJ Tetrtmethyl uccuionimle (decompOBbon product of 2^-uobmsobutyronirnle) Telrtmethyl ihiuiu dmilfide, we Tiunm Tetnnibomethane Tetjuodium pyrophosphile Tetryl, i,4,6-buubopheaylraeUiylnibuiuiie Tntllium, toluble compound!, u TI THK, Kt Teliihydtafurtn Tluincl', MX Phurile 4.4'Tluobu (fclert bul>lnnncsul| Tkuadaj)', tec bndoauUui *nuogl)rct>lM: and ff"" U ipoa \ 000 01 5 - . _ - - oat 0004 03 500 500 1 _ - no OJ i - _ _ i TITLES r 14. No. I*— >t»«4| " af/H** V«' 9 6,000 I f Ofi 04 10 9 S OJ 01 01 005 5 C 4,170 4,170 1 0.1 590 015 3 8 5 15 01 10 1 TITLES (K»gUtw M. No. i Oiawctf AtatTKO Aegutrr CENEHAL INDUSTRY SAFETY ORDERS 45155 (p. 432.270.9) AW|C| Col 137268 I346MTJ 177268 116967 10688} 584*49 1918021 800I35J 115866 75252 146138 76039 130821 71556 7900ft 79016 75694 67663 J94423 132109 76062 iff? 65 96IM 76131 78308 13121706 111448 75638 J52307 HI459 88S9I 419458 IIW67 78008 60B49 115*6 744D3J7 80*642 Thirun*; bii(dimetbyllhioctrfaimoyl) duulfide; Aruta* - 9 Tin, M|uuc compound!, u So O.I Tin, tin ande tad ioorgtnic comDoundi, eicept SaM*, u So t Tittnium dionde, u Ti, we Tible AC-3. ouutDce ptrucuUte* TMTD, we Thirira TNT. we t4,frtmutiotoluew Toluene; toluol, we Ttble AC! Toluene-t4-diiiocyuute, TDI 002 o-Toluidiae; o-melhyliiiiline t '; KC Pidoftin Toupheoe; we QJonruled ounpheae TPP, >ee Tnphenyl phosplule Tnbromamcilune, we Bionwform Tnbulvl photpUte Tiemalle, aonubatifonD, we Tibk ACJ TncUatotccbc tad I X4-Trichlorobenieae UJ Trichlor»y-bo(p-chlo(0pheiiyl)eth»oe; we DDT 1,1.1 Trichlwoelhuie, we Methyl chlonrform. Tible ACt LUTncfaloroelhuM Tnchlwoethyleae, tnchloroethene, we Tible ACS Tndikxofluofoaietlunc; Fluwocuboo U Thctilaionielhine, ice Chloroform TnchWomtlKintlhiol, we Perchloroa>etfa)rl amtipUn Tnchloroniptithtleoe Tnchloionitiomclhine, we QJotofucnn i4^TnrbkKophenoiyutbc tcid, we IX3-Tnchkxopjop«« Oi I lil tnflucxoelhiiK. *x Tible AOt l phosptule. we Tnorthonayl pbospotle Tncycloheiylba hydiouie, Pbctaia* Tnclhylimme TrUluoroinooobroinantethiiK TniiK-Ujbc uhydnde Tnmclhylbenuae, ill namen Tnmelhyl photphile l^.&TnmDophenal. we rVric *rid t,4.6-Tnnitruphcoyln>clhyliutiimiae, we Trtryl 2,4.6- Tniutiolalucne, TNT Tnoflhociayl phoiplule Tnphmylimine Tnphenyl phosphate, TPP Tungsten meltl. u W Tuiigilrn. uuoluble coropourMii. u W Tungsten, fulublc compoundl. u W TiupcnUnc 1,000 0005 B t 014 t 11 I S 40 10 45 1000 SfiOO SO 300 |OU 5 100 6,100 004 IB 10 0} 0 1 5 3 3 3 | image: ------- f SIS5 (p 43227010) Mrfilri Cfr.NK'IMI. IVDliSTHr SAFET* ORDtRS .\j/nr"' TITLE 8 l*r aj. Me. M— «- «/"• n,f Cnl '° uif"' Dl&l 75CI4 IMM 10-CJ 7JOI4 IOTDI l(l*~6 7US4 (luluiill.nwlublr rampoundi «>(• Kmun liuiuiJl. iduMr con.pound> as I' \dr \jiudiumprnloudr (X, Oil rnnublrduil UK) (um \( «n \intl rhlocNtr Sfclion SJIO WfrljWr Oil mull irurp* r^slot mil 01 umibi irnNnl wit) tr< TiMr ACM. sm«l jrrutr \in>lbnii«iK. iff Slvtrnr. Tiblf A(M \ mil biomioV. bromorth> Irnr S \nilcnlonoV.serSectionS2IO S VinilciantoV iff Acnlontlnlr Section ttll \ a>\ I C) rHuhrtrnr dioudr Vin>lioVnrrhlorid> I.Nichlnoelhvlenr V mi liolurnr \M & P (Xanuih MArn and Puntrrsl Njphllu 30 10 5 10 10 JO . 1 lilptu •rrlonxlbrnidroitroumjnn Ufldin|| lumo lotj cucticul^m Itmhomditidiulroninrurnlii Wood dull liKm illrrfirnK i Xttrnr tiloi dimHh> Ibrnimr XT T^btr At 2 m \>lfiH'-a a -duminr Xtlidinr *minodimflh)lbroirnr 01 02 175 005"' X 10 60 40 140 113(1 01 5 5 01 10 Illnum compounds TITLE 8 in»ei»t»* A>. M». .Itxrrjcl, .\ufi,tr,'" Sl,n* 1646K57 IOSJ06M 1314132 551051 148016 UKXKRAU INDUSTRY SAFETY ORDERS *-»>»•>, AW ppn Zinc cMonoV (KIW Zinc chronulr u O Zinc oudr fumr Zinc ittariit . see Tiblf AC-3. nuisanrr pirliruUlrs Zirconium compounds. i> Zr Zoalrnr'. ice 3>duurtoV 45155 (p 432270 U> «1'" Cnl »"' rn/r'W'0 V 1 005 ! J U) The Owmirjl Abstract! Service Rrgistry Numbri is • designation u>ed to identif) • sprcifir compound ot tubsUnce frgirdlrsj of Ihr naming system, these numbers uere obtained from the Desk Top Anal)sis Tool (or Ihr Common Data BJSP and (rom the Chemical Abstracts lnde>e> (bl Rr(er to Section M55(d) (or the significance of the Skin notation (c) Registered trademark names are indicated b> an asterisk (*) Id) Fur the definition and the application of the Permissible Eiposure Limit (PEL). refer to Section 5155(b) and (c)U> (el Parts of pas or \apor per million parts of air b> volume at 25* C and 760mm llg pressure (fl Milligrams of substance per cubic meter of air at 25* C and 760mm Hg pressure (f) Refer to Section 5l55lb| and lei (3! for the significance of the Ceiling notation (h> A number of gases and vaporv. when present in high concentrations, art primaril> as asplniiants without other adterse effects A concentration limit is not included for each material because the limiting factor is the a\ ailiblr ox\ gen (Set era! of Ihesr maleri als present fire or eiplosion hazards ) (i) Coal-tar pilch \olaliles (benzene or cyclohetane soluble fraction) include poUmi clear aromatic hydrocarbons (tome of which are known carcinogens) that evolv e u|>on healing the distillation residues from coil lai (j) This standard applies to the production and use of yarn. felt, and balling from unwashed waste cotton fibers It does not appl) lo cotlon gins, cottonseed oil induslix. or operations co>ered b> Section 5217 (k I A PEL limit of 005 ppm shall appl) lo exposures involving a molure of ethxlenc glvcol dmilrale and mlrogUcerin (/) As sampled b) method that does not collect vapor (ml Thermal decomposition of the fluorocarboii chain in air leads to the formation of ondned products containing carbon, fluorine and o» gen An mdei of eiposure to thedrol\sis followed b> a quantilali\e determi nation of fluoride ionicnl No particular coucenlralion limit is specified ponding e\ alua lion of the loncilv ol the products but concentrations should be kepi below the sensihx il> o( the anal\lical method (n) The concentration and percentage of the paniculate used for this limit arc drier mined from the fiaction passing a ittr selector uilh the following rhjfjf (cutties Aerodt ntinic Dumeler in Wicronictrr* Pfrcrnt lunil dfntil\ inhere* Piutmf Selector <2 90 25 75 35 5 image: ------- ^5155 CiEXLHAL INUUSTIU SAhETl HHDLHS TITLES (p 432 27U I? I IH.gill.rH. No TMII.I \C 2 EM I HSION I.M'OSl HLS ft l SL/i" Sub>l*ncr '".»' " iimil DuutiM Limn S -Irrlir and 10 Urionr 750 Bcnifnf 10 britlltum and U'rvllium c umpoundt a-- Hf — Cadmium duM» aj ( d — Cadnnum ullt al Cd — Ciibon djtulfidr 10 Caibon monoudr 50 Carbon ifnarhlondr 5 p DichlcirobtT.irnf 75 Huuiooitwn 12 |fl(li Elhtlrnc dichlundr 10 H>diuer-n Julltdf 10 Mfrcun JUI, as Hf OOUI Mt'rcun all (oim> furpl jIM a.* II; tape. Mricuit lartl and moreanu rompoundM Mrih.l alcohjl 2Ud Mrihil chloiulorm Melh'lew chluiidr PrrchloiK-lhilcnf SMrnr imonumeii Tt/lurnr Tnchloioflh-Jfnf I.IJTnchloro (21 mfluoioelhanf f luoiocaibon 113 I (In Xvlfiif 100 50 J50 I in 5(i iou !(u 23 23 IT*' 30 ODD: OU3 0(13 30 55 30 43(i 493(1 001 01 60 105 O/ 135 Si ppm 25 ppm 30 ppm 3U'ppm 23 ppm 100 ppm 2*«lpplh III' ppm 2u ppn. 610 ppm 23 ppm 2(li ppm 5(«i ppm *U ppm 2»ippiii 2in ppm ill ppm 5(1 ppm i mm 8 hit 10 mn 8 hit OOU3mc M* 30mm 8 hit 30 mm h hi 15 mm 8 hi i mm 4 hi i min 3 hi 30 mm S hi 3 mm 3 hi 10 mm 6 hit 30 mm ti hit 5 mm 6 rut S nun 3 hrt 5 nun 2 hrt i nun 2 hrt 5 mm 3 hit 5 mm 3 hit 10 niin ^ hit 5 mm 2 hit 4(1 ppm 3(Ulppm SO ppm 0(C3mp M1 06m; M* 06mp \l' Iou ppm «•> ppm 2ui ppm 20u ppm 63»l ppm 2>t> ppm 50 ppm OlMnic M* Olm; M' I.Ovii ppm 5il ppm Jlli ppm 8U> ppm I.Oli) ppm in ppm Vli ppm 5UI ppm 75 ppm ^ l«i Rrfrt lo Srlion )IUid< Iw Ihr ufnthctnir of ihr Skin Ibi f Di the drfiixition «nd llir apptu^non o^ Ihr Primiitibl* 1C..Ii it( PtiU ol fit ot t *poi prt million |>4Mt o( «n b\ t i.lun.r ld> V|illi0i«ini ol lubtunfr pri cubu nirlri ol 411 ^1 W I t iri f ,r.,uin (ocunirnii^...!.. -b,.>t ll.f rirui.i..,, lnn.1 foi « hmr prnud nol lu ritrrd Ihr nruition duulnui An rnipl»\rr mn b«- ripoti>l In 4 ronrriil(alur rt|. Irli4( riicndi < »ni rnlidliuni Irti ihdn 10 ppn. dunnp (In uinf IU ppn*. it not rtimjfd I .V" ppm 30 nun 1 hit 2U»ppm 21' ppm 30 mm b hit 3LKi ppm nuljlinii tiputufr l-iinil iPLI > irlri lo Srrhon M^^lb> and «l ^* I jiul ~f»i lino H|l plrtiulr lid 7hll nun tin plr>tuli but n.'i r«irrdn,^ llu irilinit limil dir prMiiillrJ ti^( l.lofnl. jU.i. 2*1 ppm bul nn ri jb.nf 2mi p(.n, ^ltullll|lMlh.•^>|»ull i^iiiMiiunntlllii inil.dl in unit b inioulr r«|Hnuir *!•"« r 2-5 pl'lli mot jli..« f -\.nr> ino*I IM loiniM u.jiril L. ri|M .uiri lo i jiU-n Mini a*> »ui I, :lul Ihr ^iniitiiblr ripuvuir liniil ut TITLL 8 CENEHAL INDUSTHY SAI-ETV OHUEHS $ 5155 IR»0iit»r u. NO M—tztvui (p 43227013) TAIILK AC 3 PEHMISSIIILE EXPOSUHE LIMITS K)H MINERAL DUS1S SILICA (I) Amorphous (intituling natural dialoinaceom earth) (2) Crvslalhne (Quartz (reipirjbk | Qu.irlz (loul duil) Ciislob.ilile Silica, TuM-d . . Tndvmitc Tripoli (respirjble) SILICATES (lei-, than 1% crvjtalhne i.lit Aibeilui, (including aclmolile. amo^ile. anthopht Nile. chrv>olile. crocidohlc. and Iremohle). >ee Section 520h Graphite (natural) Mna . Mineral wool fiber Perhte Portland Cement Soapvlone .. Talc (fibrouv nonfibrous and mixture*) Iremohle. nonaibe!>tiforiii COAL iWTl'MINOlSi DUST < 57f quartz, refutable fraction > 5% quartz, respirable fraction M'IS\\CI. PAIITICILATES /*/'" 300 inn MJ 10 30 TrSiOa -» 10 -PrbiO, -t 3 Use one-half the value calculated (rum the formulae for quarl2 Use the value calculated frum the formulae for quartz t'sr one half the value calculated from the formulae for quartz — 10 %S.O, + 2 15 20 30 30 20 20 20 10 10 10 10 T.SiO, 1(1 5 (•I Millidnt of pctlK'Irt p-rt cubic (ool ol an b«irtl on imuiii|i-M uiiinlrt ruujiled b) tifhl TtrM Irchn 35 • million pjilulrt uri rubir in-rlri m pcilnlri pri rut)u rrnliinriri Ibl Thr prirrni*---: of Sil)( 1*1 rrkiullmr tilu-11 in ihr fotmuL i> Ihr 4itiou.nl drlrfminrd fn H I -itbut nr uinplrt • •ir|n 111 moir iiiii4iu'ri wnrir olhn mirlhixji h^tr brcn ihou n lo (K kpplinblr Ol Both Ihr i on, run.l,,,n utd IKM rntiiir ol Sill, :.t 11. .tjjluir ,J,i . , u>rd lot ihu limil tir Jrlrniiiiird liont Ihr li»clion putiiif • mr t^lrrlot wilri Ihr folio-*mp rh«t-irlriiil>i i 15 35 image: ------- GENERAL INDUSTRY SAFETY ORDERS TITLE 8 (p. 432.270.14) (R»»i»t»r M. NO. to—»>M«I NOTE: Authority cited: Section 142.3, Labor Code. Reference: Section 142.3. Labor Code. HISTORY: 1. Amendment of Table AC-2 filed 6-3-80 as an emergency: effective upon filing (Regis- ter 80, No. 23). For pnor history, see Registers 73, No 21, 75, No 48, 76. No 71, 77, No 41, 78, No. 9; 78, No. 18, 78, No. 40, 79. No. 12. 79, No 21, 79, No. 28, and 79, No. 32. A Certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAH within 120 days or emergency language will be repealed on 10-2-80. 2. Repealer and new section filed7-2-80, effective thirtieth day thereafter (Register 80, No. 27). 3. Editorial correction of Tables AC-1 and AC-2 (Register 80. No. 32) 4. Certificate of Compliance ai to 6-3-80 order transmitted to OAL 9-29-80 and filed 10-29-80 (Register 80. No. 44) S. Editorial correction of Table AC-3 (Register 81. No 2). 6. Amendment of Tables AC-1 and AC-2 Tiled 5-28-81, effective thirtieth day thereafter (Register 81, No. 22). 7. Editorial correction of Table AC-1 (Chlorine/Chlorine dioxide) and amendment of Table AC-1 (footnote K) Tiled 7-8-81; effective thirtieth day thereafter (Register 81. No. 28). 8. Amendment of Tables AC-1 and AC-2 Tiled 8-4-81 ai an emergency; effective upon Tiling (Register 81, No 33). 9. Order of Repeal of 8-4-81 emergency order filed 8-13-81 by OAL pursuant to Govern- ment Code Section 113496 (Register 81. No. 33). 10. Editorial correction of subjection (c) (2) (B) (Register 81, No. 34). 11. Amendment of Tables AC-1 and AC-2 Tiled 9-23-81 as an emergency, effective upon Tiling (Register 81, No. 41). A Certificate of Compliance must be transmitted to OAL within 120 days or emergency language will be repealed on 1-21-82. 12. Certificate of Compliance ai to 9-23-81 order transmitted to OAL 1-21-82 and filed 2-19-82 (Register 82. No. 8). 13. Amendment of subsections (d) and (e) (4). and Tables AC-1. AC-2 and AC-3 filed 8-17-83. effective thirtieth day thereafter (Register 83, No 34). 14. Editorial correction of Table AC-1 filed 10-31-83; effective thirtieth day thereafter (Register 83. No 43) 15. Editorial correction of printing errors (Register 84. No 4). 16 Amendment of Table AC-1 filed 3-8-84. effective thirtieth day thereafter (Register 84. No. 10). A-31 image: ------- Append!x 3 . 4 Standards Regulating Carcinogens Standard (GIS0 #) Industry, Occupation, Operation 5208: Asbestos Construetion/demolition, insulation, brake repair 5209: Carcinogens Employers using the 13 listed carcinogens are required to register as users with CAL/OSHA and institute and main- tain specific procedures in order to prevent the harmful exposure of workers (i.e., warning signs on containers, re- porting procedures for release of a carcinogen into the work area). PEL Shall not exceed 2 fibers longer than 5 urn, per cubi centimeter of air as deter mined by microscopic method . Not specified. Controls indicated by the standard -are intended to reduce exposures beneath detectable levels. 2-Acetylamino- fluorene (2-AAF) 4-Aminodiphenyl (4-ADP) Benzidine and its salts bis~Chl"ororaethyl Ether (BCME) 3,3'-Dichloro- benzidine and its salts (DCB) 4-Dimethylamino-. azobenzene (Methyl Yellow) alpha-Naphthyl- amine (1-NA) beta-Naphthylamine (2-NA.BNA) Chemical research workers Chemical research workers, diphenylamine workers Dye workers, rubber, plastics, laboratories Polymer makers, laboratories Polyurethane foam workers, pigment makers Chemical research workers, coloring polishes, wax products Dye makers, rubber workers, herbicide formulators Chemical research workers, coke ovens, rubber, dyes A-3 2 image: ------- -2- Standard (GISO I) Industry, Occupation, ~Operation 5209: Carcinogens, cont. N-Nitrosodimethy- Nematocide, solvent workers, lamine (DMN, rocket fuel DMNA) beta-Propio- lactone (Beta- prone, BPL) Methyl chloro- methyl ether (CMME) Chemists, plastics and resin workers Organic chemical synthesizers, resins Ethyleneimine Textile and paper makers, (El, Aziridine) effluent treatment PEL 5210: Vinyl Chloride (Chloroethene 5212: 1,2- "Dibromo-3- chloro propane (DBCP, Fumazone, Nemagon) 5213: Acrylo- nitrile (AN, Carbacryl, VCN) 5214: Inorganic Arsenic 5215: 4,4' Methylenebis (2-chloro- aniline) (MBOCA, MOCA, CL-MDA, DACPM) Rubber, workers, polyvinyl resin, workers Pesticide formulation Fumigators, textile workers Brass, bronze, copper workers petroleum, printing, semi- conductor industry, pesticide formulation Organic chemical synthesizers, resins ppm ppbG (inhalation) skin, eyes- no contact 2 ppm (inhalation) skin, eyes- no contact 0.01 mg/m3e 10 ug/m 3f A-3 3 image: ------- -3- Standard (GISO # 5219: Ethylene Dibromide Industry, Occupation, Operation Gasoline additive, fumigant PEL 130 ppb, no skin or eye contact in con- centrations >0.1Z EDB 5220: Ethylene Oxide (EtO) Hospitals, medical supply manufacturing, fumigant Ippm a. CAL/OSHA Permissible Exposure Level as of September 1984 b. "S" indicates potential absorption through skin or mucous membranes. c. Parts of. contaminant per million parts of air. d. Parts of contaminant per billion parts of air. e. Milligrams per cubic meter of air. f. Micrograms per cubic meter of air. A-3 4 image: ------- Ul t_n SIC 1 1 1 1 19 131 139 161 171 172 173 17U 175 179 181 182 191 212 21M 2l|1 251 252 259 271 272 279 291 711 721 722 723 729 711 712 752 781 782 783 811 851 912 913 921 1021 1041 1061 1081 1099 1211 1311 1321 1381 1362 1389 I'l 11 H»29 TOTAL SC CNTY EMPLVNT 6 7 1 1 1 381 14 109 21 20 175 14 773 512 71 16 3 105 <4 139 13 1 16 98 9 1 16 11 311 5 12 338 87 677 700 56 23 15 5 1 2 3 1 1 2 2 M5 27 1 13 13 11* 18 in TOTAL SC CNTY ESTABS 2 3 2 1 38 1* 17 6' 1 22 3 83 12 13 11 1 8 1 1 2 1 6 13 3 1 3 5 7 2 2 50 31 90 87 20 6 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 5 1 6 3 i* ? 1 BY SIZE EMPLYES IN CNTY FORCE<50 6 7 1 1 1 231 11* 59 21 20 65 11 5H8 1 12 71 K6 3 20 1 5 13 1 16 23 9 1 16 11 114 5 12 338 87 M71 423 56 23 15 5 1 2 3 1 4 2 2 45 27 1 13 13 1>* 18 If) Of ESTABLISHMENT WORKFORCE EMPLYES FORCE>U9 FRCE<250 0 0 0 0 150 0 50 0 0 110 0 225 50 0 0 0 85 0 134 0 0 0 75 0 0 0 0 200 0 0 I) 0 206 277 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I) EMPLYES IN CNTY FRCE>249 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 350 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ESTABS IN CNTY FORCE<5O 2 3 2 1 35 4 16 6 1 20 3 81 10 13 1>* 1 7 1 2 2 1 6 12 3 1 3 5 6 2 2 50 31 87 84 ?0 6 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 5 1 6 3 1* ? \ ESTABS FORCE>49 FRCE<250 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ESTABS IN CNTY FRCE>2M9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 image: ------- SCIARA COUNIY tMPlOYMtNF BY Sl^t OF FSFABLISHMLNF WORKFORCE SIC > O* 1511 1521 1522 1531 15')1 1542 161 1 1622 1623 1629 71 1 721 731 7'll 7')2 7'i3 751 752 761 771 781 791 793 79') 1795 1796 1 799 201 1 2013 2022 202M 2026 2032 2033 203»4 2035 2037 2038 201(7 20')8 2051 2052 2065 2076 2077 20/9 208') 20B5 ?0fl6 2087 209 1 2097 101 Al SC CNIY EMPLYM1 23 I) 3802 5/5 397 961 1279 968 330 720 430 1)015 1 125 3471 32M 1883 323 160 1)8 ') 1U25 1319 36 327 3/6 201 13') 50 133'l 19M l')7 101) 67 55 161 2591 576 596 30 9 5 99 829 27 '1 9 l) 20 83 889 '15 351 9 I'll) 38 10IAI SC CNIY ES1ABS 2 | 886 69 71 67 123 101 1 1 56 1)2 340 196 286 63 168 65 l)U 95 150 116 1 1 1') 51) 65 1 1 9 218 3 7 2 6 2 2 15 a 5 1 2 1 9 17 3 5 1 2 1 25 1 ') 2 1 2 IMPI Yf S IN CNIY FORCK50 23 0 3192 385 337 601 928 703 30 36'l 1 /I) 2095 965 2001 32') 122B 238 160 l)2i) 872 699 36 202 238 201 7') 50 116') ') 87 1) 67 55 1 137 36 1)6 30 9 5 99 109 2? 1)9 ') 20 0 159 '15 9 9 () 38 I HIM YtS (ORCt>')9 fHCE<250 0 0 610 190 60 360 351 265 300 356 260 1570 160 1 120 0 655 85 0 60 553 620 0 125 138 0 60 0 1 70 190 60 100 0 0 160 l)5'l 250 150 0 0 0 0 3/5 O 0 0 O 83 80 0 3') 2 O HlO O IMPLYES IN CNTY FRCE>2'l9 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 350 0 350 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000 290 1)00 0 0 0 0 3D5 0 0 0 0 0 650 0 0 0 0 0 t SIABS IN CNFY FORCE<50 2 1 878 66 70 62 118 98 8 52 HO 32') 193 273 63 158 6') l)l) 94 1'|2 108 1 1 13 52 65 10 9 215 1 6 1 6 2 1 9 5 3 1 2 1 9 11 3 5 1 2 0 22 1 1 2 0 2 t SIAHS FOHCI_>!(9 FRCE<250 0 0 a 3 1 5 5 3 3 l) 2 15 3 12 0 10 1 0 1 8 a 0 1 2 0 1 0 3 2 1 1 0 0 1 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 0 (SI AI1S IN CNIY FRCE>249 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 image: ------- BY SIZC Of ESTABLISHMENT WORKFORCE SIC 2098 2099 2211 2221 2241 2253 2261 2262 2271 2291 2296 2323 2328 2329 2331 2335 2337 2341 2361 2369 2385 2386 2389 2391 2392 2393 2394 2395 2396 2399 2431 2(434 2M41 2M48 2449 2451 2452 2499 ?511 2512 2514 2515 2517 2519 2521 2522 253) 2541 2542 2591 2599 26? 1 2631 TOTAl SC CNTV CMPLYMT 7 825 65 30 1 1 2 5 6 5 5 1 3 3 20 28 11 2 7 1 3 1 5 3 92 35 30 20 5 10 72 292 349 91 132 32 40 24 203 189 53 3 77 5 14 108 4 5 318 58 124 130 61 145 TOTAL SC CNTY ESTABS 1 21 8 5 2 ; • 2 3 6 3 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 8 5 1 3 2 2 9 45 67 8 10 5 1 6 38 29 7 1 6 1 3 16 1 2 41 7 3 14 3 3 EMPLYES IN CNTY FORCE<5O 7 220 65 30 11 2 5 6 5 5 1 3 3 20 28 11 2 7 1 3 1 5 3 92 35 30 20 5 10 72 237 299 91 132 32 40 24 153 189 53 3 77 5 14 108 4 5 238 58 19 130 61 35 EMPLYES FORCE>49 FRCE<25O 0 230 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 50 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 0 105 0 0 1 10 EMPLYES IN CNTY FRCE>2M9 0 375 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ESTABS IN CNTY FORCE<5O 1 17 8 5 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 3 6 3 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 a 5 1 3 2 2 9 44 66 8 10 5 1 6 37 29 7 1 6 1 3 16 1 2 40 7 1 14 3 2 ESTABS FORCE>U9 FRCE<250 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 ESTABS IN CNTY FRCE>249 O 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b 0 0 0 0 0 0 image: ------- BY SCI AHA CUUNIY IMHI OYMENT SI/L OF ISIAULISIIMLNf WORKFORCE I U) CO SIC ?641 2643 2645 2647 26118 261(9 2651 2652 2653 2654 2655 2661 271 1 2721 2731 2732 2741 2751 2752 2753 2754 2761 2782 2789 2791 2793 2795 2812 2813 2819 2821 2822 2831 2833 2834 2801 2842 2844 2851 2869 2H/3 2874 2875 2B79 2891 2893 2899 295 1 2952 301 1 3041 3069 30/9 10IAI SC CN1Y EMPLYMF 100 61 22 350 77 48 17 1 603 150 50 0 2325 1017 645 2 213 829 1652 35 2 231 266 87 257 28 16 3 39 636 303 34 205 135 1097 144 85 53 189 232 53 8 9 1008 96 5 96 99 19 2 1 4/6 2HH8 TOFAl SC CNIY ESIABS 8 2 1 2 2 6 2 1 10 1 1 1 22 36 47 2 20 1 10 207 7 1 8 4 7 34 2 1 1 3 17 4 2 4 2 14 4 10 5 10 5 4 2 1 3 3 1 9 3 3 1 1 a 120 EMIM Yt S IN CNIY FOHCt<50 100 2 22 0 23 48 17 1 107 0 O 0 126 367 330 2 143 564 1202 35 2 73 16 87 182 28 16 3 39 76 53 34 20 0 103 43 85 53 189 12 53 8 9 8 10 5 96 34 19 2 1 /6 1202 IMPI.YES FORCE >49 mCE<250 0 59 0 350 54 0 0 0 496 150 50 0 599 330 315 0 /O 265 450 0 0 158 0 0 75 0 0 0 0 60 0 0 185 135 232 J01 0 0 0 2?0 0 0 0 0 86 O 0 65 0 O O O 1686 FMPI YES IN CNTY FKCE>249 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1600 320 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250 0 0 0 0 0 0 500 250 0 0 0 762 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 4OO O ESIAUS IN CNIY FORCE<50 8 1 1 0 1 6 2 1 6 0 0 1 14 32 44 2 19 106 201 7 1 6 3 7 33 2 1 1 3 15 3 2 3 0 10 3 10 5 10 4 4 2 1 2 2 1 9 2 3 1 1 / IO5 ESIABS FOHCE>49 FRCE<250 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 4 1 1 0 6 3 3 0 1 4 6 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 O O O O 15 ESIAUS IN CNIY FRCl>249 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 image: ------- BY SIZE OF ESTABLISHMENT WORKFORCE I U) >Ł> SIC 3111 3113 3149 3171 3172 3199 3211 3229 3231 32«4l 3253 3259 3261 3269 3271 3272 3273 3261 3291 3292 3293 3295 3296 3297 3299 3312 3315 3321 3322 3325 3339 33'H 3353 3356 3357 3361 3362 3369 3398 3399 3MI1 3U12 31(21 3H23 3<425 3D 29 3'431 3'l32 3'l33 3'1'H 3«Hl2 TOTAL SC CNTY tMPLYMT 1 1 3 2 5 2 15 38 307 86 525 77 2 20 "49 27 33 265 320 18 92 66 2U 67 900 M 6 39'4 75 22 10 3 35 80 2 16 203 182 67 74 2<4 12 0 M 6 119 75 22 10 3 35 15 2 16 78 132 67 9 28 7 79 67 2 32 6 102 2 2 90 2?/ 96 109 EMPLYES FORCE>19 FRCE<25O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 58 256 0 69 52 0 55 0 0 0 275 0 0 0 0 0 65 0 0 125 50 0 65 0 58 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '185 100 0 EMPLYCS IN CNTY FRCE>2M9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 525 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2500 0 0 0 0 0 0 ESTABS IN CNTY FORCE<5O 2 1 1 1 1 3 2 11 19 1 2 1 1 1 9 M 17 7 (4 3 1 2 2 0 1 2 5 3 2 1 1 6 3 1 3 7 7 M 3 2 3 3 M 1 7 1 1 1 1 1 10 21 10 6 ESTABS FORCE>M9 FRCE<250 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <4 1 0 ESTABS IN CNTY FRCO2M9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '1 0 0 0 0 0 0 image: ------- BY SCI.AHA COUNIY 1 MI'l OYMt NT SIZE Of ESIAHLISIIMENt WORKFORCE I .c. o SIC 3444 3446 3'1'lS 3451 3452 3'(62 3465 3469 3171 34/9 3484 3489 3493 3494 3U95 3'i96 31198 31(99 3511 3519 3523 3531 3532 3533 3535 3536 3541 35'i2 3544 35'l5 35'l6 3549 3551 3552 3553 3555 3559 3561 3562 3563 3564 3565 356 / 3569 35/2 35/3 35 /'i 35/6 35/9 3582 3585 3589 1OI Al SC CNIY EMI'LYMI 1521 84 i| 39 59 55 >l 305 1034 660 5 6 34 133 105 136 40 552 2350 6 172 197 a 14 50 8 102 21 528 384 a 163 280 2 128 2/ 101 / 300 83 5 42 16 32 405 300 70506 1343 16 232 14 1 42 144 TOIAI SC CNIY ESIAUS 90 9 1 7 8 2 1 19 57 40 2 1 2 14 4 15 2 26 1 2 a a 4 1 7 1 18 4 32 22 1 a 20 1 2 3 36 6 3 1 6 4 3 21 1 310 5 2 a 2 1 4 1 1 f MPL Yl S IN CNIY FORCE <5i 10/6 84 4 39 59 1 4 150 634 410 5 6 34 133 55 136 40 312 0 6 47 77 8 14 50 a 102 21 298 134 8 108 180 2 3 27 391 25 13 5 42 16 32 180 0 2986 /4 16 32 14 1 42 144 IMPI YES U>KCE>49 fRCE<250 445 0 0 O 0 54 0 155 0 250 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 240 0 0 125 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 230 0 0 55 '100 0 125 0 326 0 70 0 0 0 0 225 0 70/3 69 1) 200 0 0 0 0 EMPl YES IN CNIY FRCE>249 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2350 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 275 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 60447 1200 0 0 0 0 0 0 IS1AUS IN CNIY FOHCE<50 85 9 1 7 8 1 1 17 56 37 2 1 2 14 3 15 2 23 0 2 7 6 4 1 7 1 18 4 31 21 1 7 19 1 1 3 30 5 2 1 6 4 3 19 0 206 3 2 7 2 1 4 1 1 ESIAUS FORCt :-49 FRCE<250 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 68 1 0 1 0 0 o 0 ESIAHS IN CNfY H»CE>249 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 36 ' 1 0 0 0 o 0 0 image: ------- SIC 3592 3599 3612 3613 362 1 3622 3623 3629 3631 3631 3635 3639 36*1 1 3 6*1 3 3611 3615 3617 3651 3652 3661 3662 3671 3672 3673 3671 3675 3676 3677 3678 3679 3691 3692 3693 3691 3699 371 1 3713 371«4 3715 3721 37214 3720 3731 3732 3751 3761 3769 3792 3799 3811 3822 3823 38214 IOIAL sc cwrv EMPLYMT 7 6337 1 182 190 530 3914 2 181 (4 13 2 35 2'iB 102 25 2 6 (42143 306 <4387 23075 160 30147 61 52187 6 39 218 60 23819 180 16 1860 27 670 2599 37 290 5 9 2602 10 22 39 17 20010 165 21 16 1680 101 ?9?3 11 IOFAL SC CNTY ESTABS 2 610 9 9 3 13 1 10 2 3 1 1 9 5 3 1 2 27 8 32 159 1 3 1 265 1 2 11 1 371 1 5 12 5 21 10 1 20 1 2 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 12 1 1 58 5 BY size" EMPLYES IN CNTY FORCE<50 7 1609 82 110 30 159 2 51 1 13 2 35 88 22 25 2 6 160 29 301 1233 0 17 61 2163 6 39 118 0 3579 5 16 21 27 95 29 31 180 5 9 2 10 22 39 17 10 10 21 16 ?63 101 621 11 OF ESTABLISHMENT WORKFORCE EMPLYES FORCE>19 FRCE<25O O 1728 150 50 0 235 0 130 0 0 0 0 160 80 0 0 0 283 0 129 3922 160 0 0 5627 0 0 100 60 8895 175 0 316 0 575 70 0 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 953 0 171 I) EMPLYES IN CNTY FHCE>219 0 0 950 0 500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3800 277 3657 17920 0 3000 0 11397 0 0 0 0 11375 0 0 1520 0 0 2500 0 0 0 0 2600 0 0 O 0 20000 125 0 0 3161 0 18?5 0 ESTABS IN CNTY FORCE <5O 2 623 6 a 2 11 1 8 2 3 1 1 8 1 3 1 2 • 19 7 26 1 10 0 2 1 181 1 2 12 0 275 2 5 7 5 16 8 1 18 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ?9 1 1 50 5 ESTABS FORCE>19 FRCE<25O 0 17 1 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 36 1 0 0 52 0 0 2 1 81 2 0 3 0 5 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 9 0 5 0 ESTABS IN CNTY FRCE>219 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 13 0 1 0 32 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 image: ------- SCLAHA COUNIY EMPLOYMENT BY SIZE Of ESIABLISMMENT WORKFORCE I 4i K) SIC 3825 3829 3832 3841 38'l2 3843 3851 3861 3873 3911 3914 3915 3931 3942 391*14 3949 3951 3952 3953 3955 3961 3962 3963 3964 3991 3993 3995 3999 4011 41 11 4119 4121 4131 4141 4142 4151 4171 4212 4213 4214 4221 4222 4224 4225 4226 4231 4423 4454 4469 451 1 4521 45B2 4583 101AI SC CN1Y EMPLYMF 6068 407 1 122 2060 467 133 556 1663 71 86 7 6 122 9 109 203 27 9 51 14 3 13 35 9 3320 144 21 2375 42 9 122 96 1 21 105 94 14 1525 3865 911 35 674 43 654 355 173 10 1 12 241 l\ 1O5 34 TOTAL SC CNTY ESTABS 106 24 30 36 15 14 1 1 29 7 25 2 1 4 5 12 34 2 2 13 1 1 3 1 3 4 16 2 85 2 2 9 6 1 3 3 2 1 258 130 42 1 4 5 46 7 4 1 1 4 12 9 12 2 FMPl Yl S IN CNIY FORCl <50 929 197 267 307 137 33 56 208 71 86 7 6 1 7 9 49 203 27 9 51 14 3 13 35 9 20 144 21 515 42 9 122 46 1 21 105 34 14 1248 1059 453 35 74 43 355 55 63 10 1 12 106 71 10'j 34 IMIJl YES FOKCE>49 FRCE<250 2176 210 355 803 330 100 0 455 0 0 0 0 105 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 610 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 60 0 277 691 458 0 0 0 299 300 110 0 0 0 135 0 O 0 FMPl YES IN CNIY FRCE>249 2963 0 500 950 0 0 500 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3300 0 0 1250 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2115 0 0 600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ES1ABS IN CNIY FORCE<50 83 22 25 25 12 13 10 21 7 25 2 1 3 5 1 1 34 2 2 13 1 1 3 1 3 3 18 2 77 2 2 9 5 1 3 3 1 1 253 119 36 1 3 5 43 5 2 1 1 4 10 9 12 2 ESIABS FORCF>49 FRCE<250 19 2 4 9 3 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 5 8 6 0 0 0 3 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 O 0 ESTABS IN CNIY FRCE>249 4 0 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 image: ------- BY StZE^Or^EsVABLISMMENT WORKFORCE I *. LJ SIC 1712 1^/22 11723 1712 1782 1783 '1/89 1(811 (4821 '1832 >4833 0899 1923 192)4 1931 1932 1911 1953 1959 5012 5013 5011 5021 5023 5031 5039 5011 5012 5013 5051 5063 5061 5065 5072 5071 5075 5078 5081 5082 5083 5081 5085 5086 5087 5088 5093 509M 5099 5111 5112 5113 5122 5133 TOTAL SC CNTV CMPLYMT 359 1151 58 5 1 111 2 159 15 268 265 753 6 3 15 2307 528 186 39 216 1661 213 378 112 119 739 370 171 58 283 1199 308 5121 352 505 121 72 2913 166 10? 1 123 381 1091 113 155 372 161 13M 101 291 213 173 6? TOTAL SC CNTY CSTABS 16 18O 6 2 1 3 1 a 7 17 6 20 1 1 1 2 10 17 10 26 200 23 37 11 56 69 11 17 11 33 128 29 163 50 17 17 to 237 23 25 151 19 91 53 18 21 35 167 6 36 21 ?B 11 EMPLYES IN CNTY FORCE<5O 119 1151 58 5 1 11 2 11 15 268 75 193 6 3 15 7 13 13/ 39 176 1315 213 217 262 391 5/9 2/0 121 58 230 999 238 2861 352 505 121 12 1853 166 102 9/3 381 590 353 90 162 161 1001 1 1 211 189 218 6? EHPLYES FORCE>19 FRCE<25O 210 0 0 0 0 0 0 115 0 0 190 260 0 0 0 0 185 319 0 10 316 0 131 150 55 160 100 50 0 53 500 70 1810 0 0 0 0 1090 0 0 150 0 501 60 65 210 n 370 90 50 •>219 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 0 0 0 2300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 750 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ESTABS IN CNTY FORCE<5O 11 180 6 2 1 3 1 1 7 17 1 17 1 1 1 1 7 13 10 25 196 23 35 13 55 67 10 16 11 32 122 28 113 50 17 17 10 226 23 25 151 19 86 52 17 19 35 163 5 35 ?3 ?6 11 ESTABS FORCE>19 FRCE<25O 2 O 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 1 2 1 1 0 1 6 1 18 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 3 0 5 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 '2 0 ESTABS IN CNTY FRCO219 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b 0 0 0 f) 0 0 image: ------- SGI AHA COUNIY EMHIOYMENF BY SIZE OF ESTABLISHMENT WORKFORCE SIC 5134 5136 5137 5139 5 I'll 5142 5143 51'I'I 5145 5146 5 I'l 7 5148 5149 5152 5153 5154 5159 5161 5171 5V72 5181 5182 5191 5194 5198 5199 521 1 5231 5?51 5261 5271 5311 5331 5399 5411 5421 5422 5423 5431 5441 5451 5462 5463 5499 5511 5521 553.1 5541 5551 5561 55/1 5599 561 1 TOfAl SC CNIY EMPLYMI 90 61 56 18 515 156 392 174 66 3'l 492 494 730 7 2 0 4 623 45 190 309 364 269 1 13 208 5917 1539 267 1781 451 141 5/47 375 632 5040 2 37 188 // 106 127 598 19 338 4288 235 I05/ 2224 10O 195 2/1 151 544 IOIAI SC CNIY ESTABS 5 19 22 3 65 15 17 9 17 7 21 36 62 1 1 1 2 76 8 21 8 14 IB 5 22 196 86 59 76 62 24 37 18 33 376 1 3 51 15 23 19 78 5 63 103 66 206 414 22 26 45 29 103 IMPl Yl S IN CNIY FOHCL<50 5 61 56 1H 410 156 146 74 66 34 158 134 445 7 2 0 4 538 45 190 75 64 115 18 208 1009 628 267 581 451 141 140 115 190 2730 2 3/ 188 77 106 12/ 418 19 288 1 186 235 105/ 2164 10O 195 2/1 151 544 1 MI'LYt S IOHCE>49 IKCE<250 85 O 0 0 105 0 246 ion 0 0 334 360 285 0 0 0 0 85 0 0 234 300 154 95 0 358 411 0 0 0 0 2467 260 142 1460 0 0 0 0 0 0 180 0 • 50 3102 0 0 60 0 0 O O O EMPl.YES IN CNTY FRCE>249 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4550 500 0 1200 0 0 3140 0 300 850 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 [ SI ADS IN CNFY fOKCE<50 4 19 22 3 64 15 15 a 17 7 18 32 60 1 1 1 2 75 a 21 4 12 16 4 22 189 78 59 75 62 24 10 14 30 354 1 3 51 15 23 19 75 5 62 61 66 206 413 22 26 45 29 103 FSTAliS FOHCF>49 FRCE<250 1 O 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 3 4 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 2 2 1 0 6 7 0 0 0 0 17 4 2 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 42 0 0 1 0 O O O O ESIAOS IN CNIY FHCE>249 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 10 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 image: ------- I Ł>. Ul SIC 5621 56 Jl 5641 5651 5661 5681 5699 5712 571J 5711 5719 5722 5732 5733 5812 5813 5912 5921 5931 5911 5912 5913 59114 5915 5916 5917 5918 5919 5961 5962 5963 5982 5981 5992 5993 599'! 5999 6000 601 1 6022 6023 6021 6025 6032 6052 6051 6059 6122 6123 6131 61'i2 6113 6 Hi '1 TOTAL SC CNTY EMPLYMT 1 158 73 166 158 570 12 316 1285 665 171 387 125 612 370 19875 1257 17H8 1085 585 1133 587 571 612 260 271 977 71 361 199 536 8U 8 35 582 I'l 6 2815 0 17 580 658 53 1891 IB 3 11 11 10 178 6 511 3?0 15 TOTAL SC CNTV ESTABS 237 18 30 29 120 2 90 189 111 37 96 81 108 73 1321 183 169 287 151 218 79 61 171 53 36 238 15 57 55 11 31 2 1 132 15 3 559 2 2 23 30 3 181 2 1 2 2 ? 12 1 ?8 13 U BV SIZE EMPLYES IN CNTY FORCE<50 1158 73 166 158 570 12 316 1060 515 171 387 125 612 370 12617 1117 1533 1085 510 1201 117 571 612 260 163 927 71 291 199 232 81 8 35 582 11 6 2622 0 17 399 1'l8 53 3539 18 3 11 11 10 153 6 ?7I 1?0 15 OF ESTABLISHMENT WORKFORCE EMPLYES FORCE>l|9 FRCE<25O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 225 150 0 0 0 0 0 6153 110 215 0 75 232 110 0 0 0 111 50 0 70 0 301 0 0 0 0 0 0 193 0 0 181 210 0 1092 0 0 0 0 0 325 0 213 ?00 0 EMPLYES IN CNTY . FRCE>219 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1105 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 263 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ESTABS IN CNTY FORCE<5O 237 18 38 29 120 2 90 187 113 37 96 81 108 73 1237 181 165 287 153 216 78 61 171 53 31 237 15 56 55 37 31 2 1 132 15 3 556 2 2 20 27 3 163 2 1 2 2 2 8 1 21 12 1 ESTABS FORCt>U9 FRCE<25O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 82 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 3 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 ESTABS IN CNTY FRCE>2"49 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 image: ------- SCLAHA COUNTY FMPLOYMLNI BY SIZE OF ESlABLISHMtNT WORKFORCE SIC 6145 6116 6153 6159 6162 6163 621 I 6221 6281 6311 6321 6324 6331 6361 63/1 641 1 6512 6513 6514 6515 6519 6531 6541 6552 6553 6611 6711 6722 6723 6724 6732 6733 6793 6794 6799 7011 7021 7032 7033 704 1 721 1 7212 7213 7214 7215 7216 7217 7218 7219 7221 7231 7241 7251 1OTAI SC CNIY EMPl YM1 50 140 106 241 568 434 473 42 277 254 128 70 324 310 184 3608 862 958 125 1 74 701 5361 37 1609 39 81 100 158 1 29 101 42 7 83 193 3808 41 78 15 120 153 50 287 50 1 19 753 142 167 36 204 948 108 103 TOTAl SC CNIY ESFABS 13 5 12 29 48 71 45 a 56 17 2 2 14 14 4 331 138 153 24 46 23 651 2 236 5 10 21 4 1 4 a 9 2 17 48 123 a 7 4 4 31 27 a 1 48 195 46 4 1 7 68 194 42 50 EMI'I YFS IN CNIY FORCE <50 50 140 106 191 498 434 356 42 277 132 3 20 94 1 1 1 1 1 2251 612 796 125 174 76 4396 37 1099 39 81 100 8 1 29 41 42 7 83 193 804 41 78 15 10 153 50 91 0 1 19 753 142 51 36 2O4 94H 108 103 FMPLYES FOHCE>49 FRCE<250 0 0 0 50 70 0 117 0 0 122 125 50 230 199 173 1357 250 162 0 0 100 565 0 210 0 0 0 150 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 1206 0 0 0 110 0 0 196 50 0 0 0 1 16 o o o 0 o EMPLYFS IN CNIY FRCE>249 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 525 400 0 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1798 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 ESFADS IN CNTY FORCE<50 13 5 12 28 47 71 43 8 56 15 1 1 1 1 11 2 315 136 151 24 46 21 643 2 232 5 10 21 3 1 4 7 9 2 17 48 107 8 7 4 3 31 27 6 0 4 a 195 46 2 1 7 <>8 194 42 50 ESTABS FORCE >49 FRCE<250 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 2 1 1 3 3 2 16 2 2 0 0 1 7 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 o 1 0 0 o 2 o 0 0 0 0 ESIABS IN CNTY FRCE>249 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 t 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 image: ------- BY SIZE OF ESTABLISHMENT WORKFORCE SIC 7261 7299 731 1 7312 7313 7319 7321 7331 7332 7333 7339 7311 73H2 7319 7361 7362 7369 7372 7371 7379 7391 7392 7393 7391 7395 7397 7399 7512 7513 7519 7523 7531 753U 7535 7538 7539 /512 7519 7622 7623 7629 7631 7611 7692 7691 7699 7813 7811 7819 7823 7B2'i 783? 791 1 TOTAL SC CNTY tMPLYMT 2O 1 111 1226 19 ••9 82 522 '195 321 1 13I| 101 25 519 26U5 11)30 2803 533 5267 356«4 2205 114603 l|'l99 2821 1165 1022 1735 7111 2i|3 Hl5 36 1 10 1 1 10 35 131 1717 718 220 223 28(1 136 599 31 311 205 11 10i|3 80 6'« 6'l 6 2 211 1)0 TOTAL SC CNTY ESTABS 26 80 165 5 6 9 22 20 35 210 31 3 77 175 106 55 6 303 93 136 177 556 53 183 51 52 623 '(6 13 7 2 200 a 16 151 181 35 35 87 31 89 13 60 H7 12 252 21 16 10 2 1 19 1 1 EMPLYES IN CNTY FORCE<5O 141 3<)l4 901 19 <49 82 179 200 21(4 1131 10U 25 519 872 625 253 33 23614 781 829 1115 2852 32M 1095 281 M13 2761 213 95 36 0 10M8 35 131 1717 718 220 223 28M 136 1)13 3<4 311 205 1414 880 80 6 'I 6I| 6 2 I/I) '10 EMPLYES FORCE>19 FRCE<25O 60 100 325 0 0 0 313 295 110 0 0 0 0 1273 805 1300 0 2153 1005 391 1208 395 1 182 100 250 897 1280 0 50 0 110 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 186 0 0 0 0 163 0 0 0 0 I) 70 0 EMPLYES IN CNTY FRCE>2ll9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500 0 1250 500 750 1775 982 11950 1252 1315 270 1491 i»25 3070 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ESTABS IN CNTY FORCE<5O 25 78 161 5 6 9 18 18 33 210 31 3 77 163 98 M2 5 280 78 130 156 516 38 180 . 50 ill 606 16 12 7 1 199 8 16 1)51 181) 35 35 87 3") 87 13 60 1)7 12 250 ?1 16 10 2 \ 18 1 1 ESTABS FORCE>19 FRCE<250 1 2 (4 0 0 0 (4 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 8 10 0 21 1 1 <4 13 6 12 2 3 10 13 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 ? 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 ES1ABS IN CNTY fRCE>219 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 1 2 1 2 8 I) 3 1 1 1 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 image: ------- SCI AHA COON IY IMI'IOYMINI BY SI/E OK tSIAUL ISIIMENI WORKFORCE Sic f CO 7929 7932 7933 7941 79'l8 7992 7993 7996 7997 7999 6011 8021 8031 80>|1 80l|2 801)9 8051 8059 8062 8063 8069 8071 8072 8081 8091 8111 821 1 8221 8222 8231 82'll 821(3 821)9 8299 8321 8331 8351 8361 8399 8'tl I 861 1 8621 8631 66'i I 8651 866 I 8699 HH1 1 891 I 89?? 8931 101AI SC CNIY [MPI.YMT 19'l 1(3 51 556 115 21 285 80 201 1257 1 I'l9 2120 770 it 73 132 172 771 2577 11*272 1832 686 462 360 1 152 Hit, 3 21)57 20151 10036 1859 2N 14 1 38 '105 383 852 3l|7 356 1081 916 M2 51'l 300 2H2 7911 I'l 20/1 1479 1 I'l6?0 ?853 3612 IOIAI SC CNIY ES1ADS 214 10 7 19 9 7 19 17 2 82 97 280 152 2 20 35 27 12 39 16 7 2 33 7U 33 18 2I44 501 15 9 3 1 1 14 27 65 28 19 l|3 38 51 7 '45 1 7 26 57 3 12'4 '42 1 513 ?1 226 IMI'I Yl S IN CNIY fOHCf<50 19'4 '43 51 t4'l6 115 21 235 80 1 838 58'l 1359 709 14 73 132 172 82 308 0 20 0 282 310 319 213 1709 7279 170 82 2'l '4 7 38 263 383 258 197 356 355 511 'i? 'lO'l 1 38 22 / 537 Ml 10H6 ??'( 1 33116 158 133 1 1 MI'I YES M)HCE>'I9 FKCE<250 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 50 0 200 <419 315 361 61 0 0 0 0 689 1919 667 312 236 180 50 833 150 7<48 3622 135 377 0 0 0 0 112 0 3 'I'l 150 0 3'l6 '405 0 1 10 162 55 261 0 385 255 O 20fl'l 3 '4 5 681 1 MI'I YIS IN CNIY fKCE>2'49 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250 1400 0 0 0 0 0 0 350 13605 1500 1450 0 0 0 1100 0 9250 9731 moo 0 0 0 0 0 0 250 0 0 380 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 600 0 O 9 1 50 2350 16OO f SI AI1S IN CNIY EOKCE<50 2'4 10 7 1.7 9 7 18 17 1 76 92 275 151 2 20 35 27 5 16 1 2 0 31 73 2 '4 15 236 I4l42 9 14 3 1 1 14 25 65 214 17 143 32 146 7 'I'l 16 ?5 53 3 1 1H 39 1 'IB6 15 216 ESI AUS fOKCf>l|9 FRCE<250 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 1 6 '4 14 1 0 0 0 0 7 22 <4 14 1 2 1 9 2 a 50 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 2 0 5 5 0 1 1 1 2l49 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 11 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 9 l| 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 O 5 'f> 2 image: ------- APPENDIX 5 EXPOSURES TO HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES IN SELECTED INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SANTA CLARA COUNTY EMPLOYMENT (>300) AS SHOWN BY FEDERAL OSHA INSPECTION DATA. Source: Federal OSHA MIS, 1979-82. Appendix 5 shows the substances and exposure levels found in federal OSHA inspec- tions from 1979-82 for all SIC's identified in Table 4-11 (in Section 4). Included are 1) SIC's in the most hazardous 20% of industries identified by the NIOSH Industrial Risk Index (IRI); 2) SIC's in the most hazardous 20% of industries identified by the OSHA Weighted Index (OWI); 3) SIC's in the most hazardous industries identified by the Inspec- tion-Based Exposure Ranking (IBER) system; 4) SIC's with high (i.e., mean exposure > PEL) exposures to a particular substance according to federal OSHA MIS data; or 5) a combina- tion of 1) - 4). In addition, SIC's 3674 and 8062 are included by virtue of high Santa Clara County employment and special characteristics of these industries. Substances are listed by IHFOM number; a key to IHFOM numbers is given in Appendix 6. A key to SIC's (Standard Industrial Classification Codes) is given in Appendix 11. A-49 image: ------- APPENDIX 5 HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SOLAHA CNTY EMPLOYMENT US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 b SUUSI .j 320 686 1590 1903 1953 21460 2590 9010 9020 9130 9135 SUBST 360 ^ 70° •f 1520 6, '590 o 9010 SUBST 360 520 700 730 1520 1590 1591 1620 1903 2610 9010 9015 9017 9020 9130 NUM OF- INSPS ** 52 2 2 6 32 2 3 NUM OF INSPS 6 1 1 1 1 2 NUM OF INSPS 26 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 2 1 1 7 2 1 1 1 tAruauiit NUM Of TEST j SAMPS U 108 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 11 76 14 3 py prtci|pc~ LArUoUHL. NUM OF TEST SAMPS 12 2 5 1 1 3 NUM OF TEST SAMPS 66 2 14 5 1 6 6 2 14 1 1 20 'I 1 3 '4 • MEAN auua 1 ANUto MAX PROPItfc PROPTN OF PELe OF PEL 0.31 0.00 0.05 0.146 0.00 0.01 0. 13 0.17 1.39 0.15 0.149 0.36 CHMMARV • ounnAn i • MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 2.67 3.20 0.00 1.77 2.30 14.39 CHUMAR v • ounnMn v , MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 1 1 . '42 0.05 1.27 0.69 0.01 0. 12 55.31 38.35 0.02 0.00 0.00 12.60 0.00 0.00 0.56 1 .'48 7.02 0.00 0.08 0.91 0.00 0.01 0.25 0.3U 7.02 2.78 2.16 0.81 C II O C T A U f* f C OUDO 1 /MilsC-O MAX PROPTN OF PEL 12.98 5.00 0.00 1.77 2.30 12.98 CIIOC T AUrT *! OUDO 1 /\nl*E-O MAX PROPTN OF PEL 206.140 0. 10 1.60 1.10 0.01 0. 31 206.MO •4 '4 . 14 5 0.08 0.00 0.00 85.00 0.00 0.00 1. 19 2.55 usiu i n OIL.- i NUM INSP f W SOME _ ' SMP>PELS 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 3Md NUM OF INSP W h MEAN>PELn 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 NUM INSP NUM OF W SOME INSP W SMP>PEL 5 1 0 1 1 HEAN>PEL 5 1 0 1 1 2 2 NUH INSP NUM OF W SOME SMP>PEL 12 0 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 1 1 INSP W MEAN>PEL 9 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 <4 b 0 0 1 NUM OF SAMPS • OVR PEL1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 7 2 0 1 1 3 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 32 0 3 1 0 0 6 2 0 0 0 16 0 0 1 3 image: ------- INDUSTRIES WI1H HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT US OSMA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 SUBST . <430 700 1520 1591 18*10 9010 9013 9015 9020 9130 9135 SUBST 230 360 1491 685 687 690 700 725 731 1280 1290 1520 1590 1591 1610 1620 18*10 18*12 1890 1903 2571 2610 9010 9015 9020 9130 9135 NUH OF INSPS 18 1 1 3 | 1 1 1 1 6 1 1 NUH OF INSPS 69 1 1 1 <4 1 3 1 1 2 2 1 3 3 2 2 3 1 2 1 1 1 *4 9 1 Hi 2 2 EXPOSURE SUMMARY: SUBSTANCES NUH OF MEAN MAX TEST SAMPS 56 3 3 8 8 2:1 NUH OF TEST SAHPS 1l4l4 2 1 2 6 1 3 <4 2 3 U 1 6 7 9 2 5 2 3 2 2 1 7 25 3 33 3 5 PROPTN OF PEL 1.09 0. 10 11.67 0.25 0.69 0.01 0.00 0.97 0.00 O.B'I 0.17 0.19 unfiAnY. ou HEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.98 0. 11 0.61 0.55 0. 17 0. 18 0.13 0.36 0.03 0.31 0.01 0. 1 1 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.0*1 0.03 *l.77 0.00 0.01 0.20 1 .08 PROPTN OF PEL 15.23 0. 18 15.00 0.<4l 2.90 0.01 0.00 0.97 0.00 15.23 0.17 0. 19 QC T AMrT C OD i Anuc. 3 HAX PROPTN OF PEL M8.20 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.21 0.98 0.33 1.0*4 0.59 0.23 0.30 0.13 0.8*4 0. 10 1.16 0.02 0.33 0.0(4 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.0*4 0. 19 •48.20 0.00 0.09 O.'ll 2.8*1 USED IN SIC= NUH INSP W SOME SMP>PEL 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 iicrn i u c i r* uoLU in o I \j- NUH INSP W SOHE SHP>PEL 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 t 1623 NUH OF INSP W HEAN>PEL 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 - 1 ŁQO NUH OF INSP W HEAN>PEL 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 1 NUH OF SAMPS OVR PEL 11 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 NUH OF SAMPS OVR PEL 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1*4 0 0 0 3 image: ------- HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 I ui SUBST 120 230 320 «)30 1)91 560 6B5 700 730 731 930 1080 1260 1385 1520 1590 1591 1610 1781 18')0 18M2 1890 2270 2290 2390 2571 2610 9010 9020 9130 9135 SUBST 160 320 360 1)30 lt>40 6M5 686 710 730 NUM or INSPS 96 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 0 1 1 1 1 5 1 it 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 D 3 1)4 1 1 NUM or INSPS 82 1 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 tAruauKt a NUM or TEST SAMPS 291 5 6 1 1 7 1 23 3 11 11) 1 1 2 2 23 2 111 11 3 16 7 2 1 10 1 15 13 6 77 10 2 rypnciiiRF' *; E-Aruounc. o NUM or TEST SAMPS 166 1 6 1) 13 • 6 3 2 2 3 unn«nr: au MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.8M 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.86 0.1)6 15.09 0.62 0.1)5 0.00 0.00 0. 11 0.05 0.09 3.05 0.68 0.00 1.01 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0. 10 12.03 0.02 0.11) 0.22 1.62 0.03 MEAN PROPIN OF PEL 1.11 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.08 0.00 2.50 0. 1)1) O.O2 usi nnt-to MAX PROPTN or PEL 53.50 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.66 3.02 53.50 1.55 2. 11 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.05 0.69 3.10 3.1M 0.02 1.35 2.51 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.06 0. 10 53.00 0.06 0.28 5.50 6.21 0.01) ,DCT Aurr<: DO 1 MPUjCO MAX PROPIN or PEL 30.98 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.38 0.00 2.60 0.1)6 0.0<) U3tU in 3IL,= 1 i NUM INSP W SOME SMP>PEL 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 1 NUH OF INSP W MEAN>PEL 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 1 0 0 NUH INSP NUH Or W SOME SMP>PEL 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 INSP W MEAN>PEL 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 2 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 2 I) 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 14 3 0 NUM OF SAHPS OVR PEL 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 image: ------- _ . INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 > I SUBST 760 9214 1033 1037 1210 1385 1520 15314 1560 1590 1591 1670 1675 1690 18'I2 2037 2270 2280 2M60 2582 2585 2590 2610 9010 9015 9020 9130 9135 SUBST 260 1190 l)9l 560 630 760 1590 1591 1903 9010 9020 9130 9135 NUH OF INSPS 1 1 2 2 1 5 1 1 1 3 6 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 1 10 2 8 1 2 U 3 NUH OF INSPS •49 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 3 1 2 30 1 1 EXPOSURE NUH OF TEST SAHPS 1 2 3 U 1 12 2 2 2 5 13 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 6 1 1 27 2 16 2 2 6 14 NUH OF TEST SAHPS 814 5 3 2 1 3 1 1 7 1 2 56 1 1 SUMMARY: HEAN PROPFN OF PEL 0.00 1. 16 O.OO 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.02 0.09 0. 10 0.03 2. M 1 0^25 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.10 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.06 O.H4 H.69 0.00 0.00 0.32 10.27 CHMMARV • ounnftn T • HEAN PROP1N OF PEL 0.143 0.25 0.09 0.01 0.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 ii . aii 0.00 0.81) 0 . Oil 1.59 0. 10 SUBSTANCES MAX PROPTN OF PEL 0.00 1.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.014 0. 12 0. 13 0.05 11.00 0.25 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.39 0.20 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.2M 30.98 0.00 0.00 0.70 29.73 CUpCTAUpCC OUDO 1 MrlljlL D MAX PROPTN OF PEL 13.140 0.81 0.23 0.01 0.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.1)0 0.00 1 .60 0.58 1.59 0. 10 USED IN SIC= NUH INSP W SOME SHP>PEL 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 1 ii cm i u CIP— UOCLJ 1 If 31 l« — NUH INSP W SOME SMP>PEL 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1721 NUH OF INSP W HEAN>PEL 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 1 1711 ________ NUH OF INSP W HEAN>PEL <4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 NUH OF SAHPS OVR PEL 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 1 NUH OF SAHPS OVR PEL 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l) 0 1 0 1 0 image: ------- HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTV EMPLOYMENT US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 SUBST 2610 SUBST (491 685 730 1385 1591 1720 2037 2590 9010 9210 SUBST 290 320 •430 700 760 1013 1781 1810 1955 2335 9020 9130 9135 NUM OF INSPS 1 1 NUM OF INSPS 10 1 1 1 1 NUM OF INSPS 35 2 2 1 20 1 1 2 1 tArubunt NUM OF TEST SAMPS 1 1 NUM OF TEST SAMPS 1 1 py pnciipr LArUounc. NUM OF TEST SAMPS 118 a 2 1 93 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 2 2 aunri ANY : MEAN PROPTN OF PEL O.O'I O.OU CHMMARV • ounriMn • . MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.06 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.014 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.03 CIIMMARV * ounnMn i • MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 1.146 0.05 0.00 0.23 2.147 0.00 0.00 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 10 0.05 auoai Anut-3 MAX PROPTN OF PEL 0.011 0.014 CIIRCT Aupr c OUDO 1 MrlLit- O MAX PROPTN OF PF.L 0.37 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.014 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.03 CIIQ t T AUpfC OUDO 1 MrlLf C.O MAX PROPTN OF PEL 814.50 0.25 0.00 0.23 B'l.50 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o. id 0.06 UbtU IN SIL,- NUM INSP W SOME SMP>PEL 0 0 NUM INSP W SOME SMP>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUM OF INSP W MEAN>PEL 0 0 NUM OF INSP W MEAN>PEL * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUM INSP NUM OF W SOME SMP>PEL 114 0 0 0 13 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 INSP W MEAN>PEL 12 0 0 0 11 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 145 0 0 0 143 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 image: ------- INDUSTRIES WI1II HIGH SCLARA CNTV EMPLOYMENT US OSIIA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 SUBST 560 686 690 731 1280 1520 1591 1620 18'42 2610 9010 9020 9130 SUBST > 9020 1 {J1 \J\ SUBST 227 230 260 360 l|30 M'lO 1460 M91 560 685 686 700 710 720 726 730 731 NUM OF INSPS 20 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 1 I| 1 NUH OF INSPS 1 1 NUH OF INSPS 123 2 2 EXPOSURE NUM OF TEST SAMPS 56 2 1 1 1 3 7 1 14 1 11 2 21 1 cwpncimr CArUoUn t NUM OF TEST SAMPS 1 1 NUM OF TEST SAMPS 265 2 1 <4 «4 5 2 1 3 1 <4 2 14 U 1 PEL HEAN>PEL 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUM INSP NUH OF W SOHE INSP W SHP>PEL MEAN>PEL 0 0 0 0 iiQm iu cii^ 1700 ___._.._._.._- NUH INSP NUH OF W SOHE INSP W SHP>PEL HEAN>PEL 21 19 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 3 2 0 0" 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 NUH OF SAHPS OVR PEL 0 0 NUH OF SAMPS OVR PEL U8 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 14 0 0 0 0 0 image: ------- HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 I ui CTl SUBST NUM LAruaunt : OF NUM OF INSPS TEST 830 920 1037 10140 1073 1280 1300 1360 1385 SAMPS 2 1 2 2 2 2 3 1 1 1520 14 7 1590 2 3 1591 6 11 1620 1653 1730 177M 1790 18<40 18142 2037 2038 2180 2217 2280 2290 2310 2«460 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 14 2 3 14 3 3 4 8 2470 3 6 2190 2505 2571 14 3 1 2590 14 1 1 2610 2611 2612 2 1 1 9010 11 33 9020 25 60 9130 5 10 9135 14 7 MEAN PHOPTN Of 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 PEL .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .01 .01 .00 .00 .25 .31 .91 .00 .00 .06 .00 .00 .02 .00 .00 .68 .00 .38 .26 .0(4 .00 .38 .09 .66 .61 .00 .01 .00 .00 .00 .63 .30 .60 .23 oainn MAX Ut3 U PROPTN OE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 5 1 8 PEL .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .01 .02 .00 .00 .75 .75 .90 .00 .00 .07 .00 .00 .03 .00 .00 .50 .00 .140 .'(8 .06 .00 .50 .35 .95 .80 .00 .014 .00 .00 .00 .67 .66 .60 .69 3Lu in aii.- NUM INSP W SOME SMP>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 3 2 2 fVV NUM OE INSP W MEAN>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 >4 2 2 2 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 7 14 U image: ------- INDUSTRIES WIIH HIGH SCLARA CNTV EMPLOYMENT US OSIIA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1962 I cn SUBST 310 t|t|0 560 1037 1590 1591 2260 2460 2590 9020 9135 SUBST 140 320 M30 »435 MUO 1460 9214 10'lQ 1380 1385 I53«4 1536 1675 2037 2270 2280 2l|60 21470 2590 9130 9135 9210 NUM OF INSPS 17 1 ; NUM OF INSPS 56 3 1 5 2 1 2 1 2 1 6 1 3 1 3 2 1 9 1 6 1 1 3 EXPOSURE NUM OF TEST SAMPS 35 1 2 6 2 1 12 1 1 3 14 2 NUM OF TEST SAMPS 210 14 2 15 9 1 5 1 7 2 3U 2 5 14 9 8 2 39 8 31 5 1 16 SUMMARY: SUBSTANCES MEAN MAX PROPTN OF PEL 1.51 0.00 0.05 1.17 0.00 0.09 M.38 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.00 1.26 Q1IMMAD V • dl DUrlPlAnT. OU MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.19 0.03 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.09 0.08 0.21 0.00 0.07 0.08 0.09 0. 10 0.00 0.27 0. 16 0. 13 0.65 0.30 1 .02 PROPTN OF PEL 18.62 0.00 0.06 1.60 0.00 0.09 18.62 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.02 1.80 USED IN SIC-2O86 NUM INSP NUM OF W SOME SMP>PEL 6 0 0 1 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 1 INSP W MEAN>PEL 6 0 0 1 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 1 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 10 0 0 2 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 1 MAX PROPTN OF PEL 5.57 0.014 0.01 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.27 0.13 0.96 0.00 0.15 0. 11 0.22 0.29 0.01 1.55 0.148 0.314 0.99 0.30 5.57 NUM INSP NUM OF W SOME SMP>PEL 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 INSP W HEAN>PEL 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 8 image: ------- ME ALT II HAZARD EXPOSURES INDUSTRIES Wllll HIGH SCIARA CNTV EMPLOYMENT US OSIIA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1962 I 01 00 SUBST 10 130 135 110 1380 1531 1591 2037 2280 2160 2590 9210 9211 SUBST 10 230 260 320 130 135 110 160 685 710 630 660 923 1033 1037 1010 1060 1160 1170 1290 1360 1360 1538 1560 1590 1591 1620 NUM OF INSPS 21 1 3 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 3 2 2 1 NUH OF INSPS 111 1 1 3 5 9 2 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 3 5 1 3 1 2 1 1 1 7 1 5 2 1 tAI'UOUHL NUH OF TEST SAHPS 57 3 6 1 1 3 2 1 1 7 12 5 1 3 cv Pn^iinr CArUOUnL NUH OF TEST SAHPS 270 2 1 6 10 28 6 3 5 1 1 13 7 1 1 11 5 5 1 2 1 1 1 20 12 10 10 1 MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.07 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.07 0.00 0.00 0. 16 0.01 0.02 0.35 0.08 ^IIMMAR V * Qll OUfVlAn it 3U MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0. 12 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.05 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.07 0.02 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.01 0.38 0.29 0.01 0.00 Dai«nL,L3 u MAX PROPTN OF PEL 0.59 0.00 0. 12 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.25 0.06 0.59 0.10 QCTAUPPQ II D3l/*nLfC.d U MAX PROPTN OF PEL 2.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.11 0.39 0.05 0.00 0.00 0. 11 0.20 0.05 0.00 0.06 0.09 0.06 0.09 0.07 0.01 .0.00 0.13 0.00 0.20 2. 10 2.71 0.15 O.OO atu in aiu=«:: NUM INSP W SOME SMP>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 crn i u cir* o~ oLU In old— ci NUH INSP W SOHE SHP>PEL 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 >M 1 NUH OF INSP W HEAN>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 »C t ____ _ NUM OF INSP W MEAN>PEL 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUH OF SAHPS OVR PEL 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 image: ------- INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTV EMPLOYMENT US OSIIA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 SUBST NUM EXPOSURE OF NUH OF INSPS TEST 1730 1913 1910 SAMPS 1 1 1 1 1 1 2037 6 23 2 1 70 2 3 2180 3 1 2132 1 2 2160 10 33 2505 2510 2582 3 2 1 2590 7 19 9130 9135 SUBST NUH 1 2 OF NUH OF INSPS TEST SAMPS 81 199 20 1 1 10 1 12 230 1 1 320 1 8 130 3 9 135 2 5 110 150 160 177 560 575 686 730 830 810 1033 1010 < 1050 1060 1080 1387 1190 15?0 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 3 6 1 7 5 2 1 3 1 1 3 1536 2 1 1538 2 1560 7 25 SUMMARY: SUBSTANCES MEAN MAX . PROPTN OF PEL 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.07 0.00 0. 11 0.00 0.11 0.02 0.06 0.69 0.01 ^IIMMARV- PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 INSP W HEAN>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUH INSP NUH OF W SOME SHP>PEL 6 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 INSP W HEAN>PEL 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUH OF SAHPS OVR PEL 15 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 image: ------- HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 SUBST 1590 1591 1631 1653 1720 1730 2037 2170 2263 2270 2430 2460 2572 2590 2610 5010 9135 SUBST > 1 a\ 0 170 260 360 430 490 640 685 686 720 730 790 874 1050 1060 1210 1270 1280 1430 1460 1520 1590 1591 1660 1710 NUM OF INSPS 3 5 1 1 2 4 6 1 1 1 1 5 1 2 1 1 1 NUM OF INSPS 67 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 3 1 1 3 1 1 tAruauNt a NUM OF TEST SAMPS 8 10 8 2 5 10 11 1 1 4 2 14 2 3 3 1 1 NUM OF TEST SAMPS 239 2 2 3 2 1 1 2 11 3 3 1 5 2 4 4 1 20 4 15 3 1 a 3 1 unnnnr: au MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.69 0.04 0.67 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.08 0.08 0. 10 0.03 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.25 unnAnv • ou MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 1. 14 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 11 0.24 8.83 0.05 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0. 14 2.93 0.20 0.02 0.01 6. 17 0.00 0.00 nai ANL.C.O u MAX PROPTN OF PEL 5.96 0.24 1.00 0.00 0.71 0.00 0. 18 0.08 0. 10 0.03 0.00 1.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.25 acTAuprc ii DdlArlt-ft-O U MAX PROPTN OF PEL 23.40 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.40 0.46 17.63 0.05 1.60 0.00 0.00 0. 14 0.00 0.70 5.30 0.87 0.03 0.01 18.00 0.00 0.00 atU in 3IL,- NUM INSP W SOME SMP>PEL 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 icm i M ^ i P- DtLU lr| O 1 \J- HUM INSP H SOME SMP>PEL 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 •ŁIJŁ -------- NUH OF INSP W MEAN>PEL 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 NUM OF INSP W MEAN>PEL 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PF.L 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 image: ------- INDUSTRIES WI1II HIGH SCLARA CNIV EMPLOYMENT US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 SUBST NUH OF INSPS 1720 1 1730 1791 1797 1970 2085 2090 2210 2213 2310 2130 2160 < 2560 2561 2570 2590 2610 9010 t 9015 9050 9130 5 9135 3 1 (Ti 1-1 SUBST NUH OF INSPS 231 10 1 10 . 1 120 6 130 1 110 2 170 2 230 6 260 3 270 1 310 1 320 3 382 1 390 1 130 5 160 3 190 7 191 1 527 1 570 1 • EXPOSURE NUH OF TEST SAHPS 2 1 3 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 5 6 13 13 3 2 1 32 19 1 20 1 EXPOSURE NUH OF TEST SAHPS 652 1 1 30 3 1 2 18 10 2 1 9 1 1 23 6 15 1 1 3 SUMMARY: MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.13 0.00 0.01 0.02 2.30 0.09 0.00 8.58 2.35 3.30 0.01 0. 76 0.13 0.19 2.39 0.00 0.00 0.91 0.00 0.00 0. 11 0.16 SUHHARY: HEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.92 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.00 1.31 0.02 0.56 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0. 1? 0.00 0. 32 0.07 0.00 0. ?} SUBSTANCES HAX PROPTN OF PEL 0.16 0.00 0.03 0.03 2.30 0.09 0.00 23.10 3.10 3.30 0.07 2.53 1.50 1.10 6.20 0.00 0.00 6.21 0.00 0.00 1.07 2.00 SUBSTANCES HAX PROPTN OF PEL 72.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 2.01 0.01 2.96 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.00 1.33 0.01 1.95 0.07 0 . 00 0. IB USED IN SIC=2B19 NUH INSP NUH OF W SOHE SHP>PEL 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 (I 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 USED IN SIC=2 NUH INSP W SOHE SHP>PEL 11 0 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 INSP W HEAN>PEL 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 NUH OF INSP W HEAN>PEL 28 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 NUM OF SAHPS OVR PEL 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 2 1 0 3 2 1 1 0 0 15 0 0 1 1 NUH OF SAHPS OVR PEL 83 0 0 3 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 image: ------- HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1962 I Ol to SUBST HUM OF NUM OF INSPS TEST SAMPS 620 2 4 630 631 610 685 690 700 710 720 730 731 760 820 830 907 910 990 1010 1015 IQ'lO 1060 1160 1225 It 7 1 2 l! 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1290 6 12 1300 1 >4 1385 2 3 1515 2 3 1520 2 5 1560 5 19 1590 11 =Ł< NUM INSP W SOME SMP>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 6 7 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 NUM OF INSP W MEAN>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 12 11 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 PEL image: ------- INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNIV EMPLOYMENT US OSMA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 SUBST 2170 2180 2210 2215 2280 2310 2390 2'l60 2'! 70 21)80 2H95 2580 2582 2590 2592 2610 9010 9013 9015 9017 9020 9130 > 9135 1 CT\ SUBST 260 335 670 685 730 1290 1560 1590 1631 1730 1912 2220 9010 9130 9135 NUM OF INSPS 1 1 1 1 7 2 2 7 5 1 1 8 1 3 1 1 6 1 2 1 7 18 8 NUM OF INSPS 39 ; 2 9 15 EXPOSURE NUM OF TEST SAMPS 1 1 1 1 25 2 2 17 17 1 1 75 1 t| 1 1 20 1 5 U 11 59 19 EXPOSURE NUM OF TEST SAMPS 105 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 2 8 2 2 1 2 25 51 SUMMARY: MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.05 0. 11 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.06 0.15 0.06 1.52 0.00 0.00 l|.02 0.00 0.01 0.07 0.00 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.50 0.21 SUMMARY: MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.38 0.00 0.02 2.148 0.00 0.014 0. 15 0.22 0.23 0.01 0. 114 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.66 0. 36 SUBSTANCES MAX PROPTN OF PEL 0.05 0. 114 0.00 0.00 0.63 0. 12 0.31 0.63 7.10 0.00 0.00 72.00 0.00 0.03 0.07 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.80 6.l4l4 0.89 SUBSTANCES MAX PROPTN OF PEL 3.60 0.00 0.02 2. MB 0.00 O.O'I 0. 16 0.35 0.25 0.06 0. 18 O.OIl 0.00 0.00 3.60 2.32 USED IN SIC=2821 NUM INSP NUM OF W SOME SMP>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 >4 0 USED IN SIC=2 NUM INSP W SOME SMP>PEL 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 M INSP W MEAN>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 NUM OF INSP W MEAN>PEL 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 NUH OF SAMPS OVR PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 6 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 11 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 6 image: ------- IIFALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES INDUSTRIES HUH HIGH SO LARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 I cr> SUBST NUM tAPUbUKl a OF NUM OF INSPS TEST SAMPS 80 1814 20 2 2 123 1 1 260 7 19 300 319 <490 1 6 1 2 1 2 525 3 6 529 570 612 1 2 1 2 1 2 681 2 >l 730 2 8 846 3 8 868 3 7 871 910 926 1 1 1 1 1 2 928 3 5 1019 2 6 11140 1251 1515 1520 1536 1591 1610 1616 1620 16M6 1775 1810 1860 1984 2037 2125 2216 1 2 2 1 1 1 17 1 6 6 2 7 5 1 1 1 11 1 2310 2 4 2333 6 2*460 2 2 2571 1 2586 2 5 2610 2 2720 3 6 9010 2 9130 3 3 9135 3 11 unnAitr: au MEAN PROP IN OF 2 0 0 6 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 PEL .37 .00 .00 .78 .27 .03 .00 .014 .06 .02 .00 .00 .29 .03 .16 .31 .00 .06 .07 .15 .00 .50 .28 .114 .03 .69 .00 .00 .20 .00 .914 .23 .08 .00 .00 .20 .00 .96 . in . 10 .00 .01 .00 . <|6 .07 . 18 .Ml HOI «H MAX UtS U PROPTN OF 167 0 0 1143 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 167 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 1 1 PEL .50 .00 .00 .70 .60 .04 .00 .94 . 10 .05 .00 .00 .147 .07 .48 .31 .00 .13 .27 .80 .00 .00 .28 .14 .03 .60 .00 .00 .60 .00 .50 .45 .08 .00 .00 .20 .00 .43 .38 .21 .00 .05 .00 .67 .14 .79 .45 atu in aii.=c:i NUM INSP W SOME SMP>PEL 13 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 NUM OF INSP H MEAN>PEL 12 0 0 2 0 0 0 .1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 31 0 0 5 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 image: ------- IILMLItl n/WLMt\tS LArUdUHt^ INDUSTRIES Wllll HIGH SCLARA CNTV EMPLOYMENT US OSIIA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 SUBST t|6 60 120 160 230 260 290 310 320 372 110 '130 135 I)UO 160 1(78 1490 U91 5MO 590 6'l5 685 686 687 690 720 730 731 790 830 860 871 923 931 950 1013 1037 10HO 1060 1073 1 I7ri 1 190 1280 1?85 1290 1300 1371 1377 1380 NUN OF INSPS 521 17 2 2 1 6 1 1 4 2 1 1 37 1 3 3 1 9 1 2 2 3 9 2 1 M 2 4 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 11 M 15 3 (4 1 1 6 1 2 1 U NUM OF MEAN TEST PROPTN SAMPS OF PEL 1387 56 3 9 3 13 3 1 11 3 1 1 12<4 2 6 5 1 H2 2 111 1 5 11 5 1 12 ^ 5 3 1 15 3 1 1 5 1 5 (4 33 10 33 10 10 M 1 1 1 2 3 1 5 O.ill 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.37 0.05 0.09 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.05 0. 16 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.20 0.13 1.20 0.67 0.07 0.00 0.01 0.62 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0. 13 0.0»l 0.03 0. 12 0.03 0.06 0.00 0.06 0.03 0.72 0.02 0. 10 0.03 52.80 0.32 0.00 0.03 0.00 1.51 0.11 0.09 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.05 2.99 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.20 2. 10 l.llO 3.60 0. 12 0.00 0.02 1.9M 0.00 0.06 0.03 0.05 0. 10 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 O.ltO 0.39 0.07 3.50 0.20 0.31 0.00 0.06 0.26 0.80 0.05 0. 10 0. 1 1 STANCES MAX PROPTN OF PEL 52.80 0.32 0.00 0.03 0.00 1.51 0.11 0.09 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.05 2.99 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.20 2. 10 l.llO 3.60 0. 12 0.00 0.02 1.9M 0.00 0.06 0.03 0.05 0. 10 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 O.ltO 0.39 0.07 3.50 0.20 0.31 0.00 0.06 0.26 0.80 0.05 0. 10 0. 1 1 USED IN SIC= HUM INSP W SOME SMP>PEL 63 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3O79 NUM OF INSP W MEAN>PEL KM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 133 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 «l 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 image: ------- HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT US OSIIA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1962 SUBST 1385 1160 1'iao 1520 1536 1538 1560 1590 1591 1593 1620 1631 1660 1690 1720 1730 1732 1750 1771 1790 18'IO 1910 1980 1990 2020 2037 2QI|0 2170 2180 2215 2230 2210 2260 2280 2390 2131 2132 2160 2170 2185 2190 2572 2580 2582 2583 2581 2590 2600 2610 2650 NUM OF INSPS 6 1 1 3 1 1 5 12 21 1 2 1 1 1 6 11 1 2 2 1 1 1 3 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 15 7 3 1 30 19 1 2 1 13 1 1 1 11 1 3 3 lAKUbUHt & NUM OF TEST SAMPS ?8 3 9 7 2 3 7 22 66 1 5 1 2 2 18 25 1 1 5 7 5 1 a i 2 i 10 3 9 1 7 1 1 209 15 1 1 73 65 1 1 2 28 12 1 2 19 1 3 12 UMMAKY: &u MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.31 0.00 0.03 0.09 1.01 0.00 0.05 1.16 1.93 9.06 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.05 0.13 0.07 0.00 0.02 0.11 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.08 2.51 0.07 0. 10 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.53 0.10 0.00 0.23 0. 1 1 0.60 0.67 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 o.o/ 1.85 dblANLlS U MAX PROPTN OF PEL 1.70 0.00 0. 11 0.28 1.29 0.00 0.21 16.50 52.80 9.06 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.07 0.29 0.57 0.00 0.05 1.21 0.00 0. 12 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.27 0.20 10.00 0.15 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 2.17 0.13 0.00 0.23 1.19 19.97 0.93 0.10 0.00 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 10 0.00 0.20 31.15 ill! IN &IU-J NUM INSP W SOME SMP>PEL 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 1 u/y NUM OF INSP W MEAN>PEL 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 NUM OF SAMPS I'VR PEL 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 23 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 image: ------- INDUSTRIES WITH MICH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT US OSMA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1962 I O\ SUBST 9010 9020 9130 9135 9210 SUBST 230 260 310 (430 (4 1(0 (491 520 560 685 686 730 731 lO'lO 1073 1280 1385 1(|(40 1(460 1520 1590 1591 1631 le'io 2085 2230 2280 2330 2M30 2l|60 2(190 2582 2590 2610 2650 9010 9020 NUM OF INSPS 6 15 31 22 1 NUM OF INSPS 85 3 9 2 2 2 8 ; ; 2 1 1(4 6 EXPOSURE SUMMARY: NUM OF MEAN TEST SAMPS 8 26 66 Ml 11 rvprtQUDr Q tArUoUKL O NUM OF TEST SAMPS 16U 3 20 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 3 7 2(4 1 1 1 1 (4 1 1 5 1 2 (4 5 1 28 20 PROPTN OF PEL 0.07 0.07 0.8(4 1.26 3.36 unnARY l MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.85 0. 15 1.30 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.76 0.01 0.00 0. 1 1 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.08 0.77 M.6I4 0.89 0.01 0.00 0.60 0.23 0.00 1.65 0.03 0.08 0 . 00 O.OJ 0.09 0.00 1 .06 0.01 SUBSTANCES MAX PROPTN OF PEL 0.63 0.96 11.71 36.20 11.53 ciio c T A UP re OUD3 1 ArlUto MAX PROPTN OF PEL 59.00 0.140 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.0(4 0.01 0.81 0.01 0.00 0. 1.1 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.00 0.01 0.03 0. 16 2. 10 59.00 0.89 0.01 0.00 0.60 0.88 0.00 1.65 0. 10 0.08 0.00 0.05 0. 36 0.00 10. (I '4 0. II USED IN SIC=3079 NUM INSP NUM OF W SOME SMP>PEL 0 0 6 6 INSP W MEAN>PEL 0 0 5 6 1 1 iicrn iy cir* 1000 NUM INSP NUM OF W SOME SMP>PEL 16 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 INSP W MEAN>PEL 15 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 t4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 (4 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 0 0 8 8 10 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 39 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 image: ------- HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT US OSIIA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1902 I (T> 00 SUBST 9130 9135 SUBST 120 170 260 320 430 440 520 560 631 685 686 690 700 720 725 726 730 731 1073 1280 1366 1430 1480 1520 1590 1591 1620 1790 1791 1840 1842 1890 1903 2260 2290 231O 2330 2460 2470 NUM OF INSPS 3 5 NUM OF INSPS 195 1 1 3 2 1 1 3 1 1 5 1 2 5 1 13 2 4 8 1 2 1 3 1 18 9 10 5 1 1 3 2 1 1 2 1 t 2 3 1 tAKUbUHL 3 NUM OF TEST SAMPS 4 6 PVDftQIIDP Q tArUoUnt o NUM OF TEST SAMPS 1242 1 6 3 2 1 1 8 2 1 45 6 9 12 1 455 4 13 40 1 2 3 12 3 88 49 76 11 5 1 30 4 3 3 2 3 3 8 4 1 MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.09 0.13 MEAN PROPIN OF PEL 0.59 0.00 0.53 0.03 1.67 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.46 0.00 0.01 0.31 0.02 0.82 0.00 1.92 0.00 0.23 0.28 0.00 0.26 0.25 0. 12 0.00 0.25 1.27 1.67 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 17 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 auuamnijtQ MAX PROPTN OF PEL 0.38 0.48 QllttQTAMfTQ OUDo 1 AnljlLO MAX PROPTN OF PEL 118.00 0.00 0.99 0. 10 3.32 0.00 0.00 0.90 0.50 0.00 0.05 0.60 0.05 3.05 0.00 118.00 0.00 1.19 1.07 0.00 0.52 0.31 0.37 0.01 3.36 9.80 20.54 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.06 0. 14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.00 1.70 0.00 UCJLU in sii^jjj NUM INSP W SOME SMP>PEL 0 NUM OF INSP W MEAN>PEL 0 0 0 NUM INSP NUM OF W SOME SHP>PEL 48 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 13 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 INSP W MEAN>PEL 25 0 0 0 1 0 o • 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 289 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 211 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 13 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 image: ------- INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA SUBST 2M90 2570 2587 2590 2610 2611 2612 5010 9010 9015 9020 90«40 9130 9135 SUBST 230 260 310 320 360 1430 1435 14140 1490 1491 590 685 686 687 690 710 720 730 731 1037 1080 1280 1380 1385 11(30 1'460 1520 NUH OF INSPS 1 2 1 3 9 3 1 . 3 16 1 6 6 13 6 NUH OF INSPS 29M 3 1 1 3 2 14 2 3 1 2 1 1(4 114 1 7 2 3 2 17 1 2 5 1 2 1 1 i|'i us EXPOSURE NUH OF TEST SAMPS 6 2 1 3 38 17 1 7 1214 1 114 28 149 27 NUH OF IEST SAMPS 726 10 1 1 5 5 7 5 6 2 5 1 29 26 2 10 14 <4 7 142 3 3 10 3 2 1 2 1'(9 CNTV EMPLOYMENT OSIIA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.143 0. 12 0.33 0.17 0.05 0.30 0.00 0.03 0.146 0.00 0.30 0.37 0.99 2 fy^ dIMMAR V • ^11 ounn AH T . ou MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.141 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.02 0. It 1.87 0.01 0.1414 0.01 0. 16 0. 32 0.00 0.57 O.?0 0.00 0.22 0.01 0.01 O. ?3 oa i Aiii*c.a HAX PROPTN OF PEL 1.34 0.20 0.33 0.50 1.15 0.89 0.00 0.10 7.59 0.00 1.81 1.75 22.90 53.80 NUH INSP NUH OF W SOHE SHP>PEL 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 0 1 2 14 2 INSP W HEAN>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 NUH OF SAHPS OVR PEL 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 15 0 1 2 7 7 HAX PROPTN or PEL 106.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.05 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.11 0.80 3.57 0.02 0.60 0.06 1 . 1| l| 3.115 0.00 1. 10 0. 70 0.00 0. 37 0.01 0.02 1. 16 NUH INSP NUH OF W SOHE SHP>PEL 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 INSP W MEAN>PEL 2M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUH OF SAHPS OVR PEL 68 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 image: ------- HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SOLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 SUBST 1560 1590 1591 1610 1620 1622 1791 1840 1842 2037 2085 2170 2310 2430 2460 2532 2570 258D 2590 2610 2611 2612 •« 5010 ^ 9010 -lj 9015 0 9017 9130 9135 SUBST 160 320 1430 440 160 685 686 687 690 700 730 731 790 NUM or INSPS 2 13 24 5 16 2 1 14 2 6 1 3 14 21 1 6 2 7 1 1 •4 5 NUM or INSPS 101 1 1 2 1 2 14 3 1 2 1 2 7 1 lAfuaunt a NUM or TEST SAMPS 2 40 66 9 143 13 2 11 5 16 1 1 1 6 15 2 1 5 26 62 2 8 3 23 1 1 9 7 NUM or TEST SAMPS 316 1 2 6 3 5 114 14 14 6 2 3 27 1 UMMAHY I MEAN PROPTN or PEL 0.02 1.63 1.25 0.02 0. 16 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.05 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.01 0.08 0.314 0.76 0.17 0. 10 0. 16 1.78 0.00 0.00 1.05 0.68 unn«ftY • MEAN PROPIN or PEL 0.314 0.20 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.014 0.32 0.02 0.01 0.00 O.O2 0.90 0.00 bUUSIANUtS MAX PROPTN or PEL 0.04 147.60 106.00 0.06 1.46 0.140 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.06 0.05 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.01 0. 16 •4.27 15.00 0.18 0.62 0.143 12.97 0.00 0.00 3.99 2.80 c 1 1 o c T A UP r c OUDD 1 Anl.t-3 MAX PROPTN or PEL 10.00 0.20 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0. 12 0.93 0.10 0.02 0.00 0.06 5.00 0.00 uatu in a 11,= NUM INSP W SOME SMP>PEL 0 6 7 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 2 1 item i u c i f uotLU in o i (_,— NUM INSP W SOME SMP>PEL 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 NUM or INSP W MEAN>PEL 0 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 14 0 0 2 1 3 I.!. i. ________ NUM or INSP W MEAN>PEL 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 NUM or SAMPS OVR PEL 0 25 16 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 10 0 0 14 1 NUM or SAMPS OVR PEL 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 image: ------- INDUSTRIES WI1II HIGH SCLARA CNTV EMPLOYMENT US OSIIA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 SUBST 1170 1300 1520 1590 1591 1620 1720 1790 1840 1842 1941 2037 2085 2260 2310 2460 2571 2587 2590 2610 9010 9020 •_. 9130 7 9135 -u (-• SUBST 40 430 435 460 490 686 690 730 731 860 1073 1385 1460 I5?0 1590 1591 1620 NUM OF INSPS 1 1 12 4 3 6 1 1 4 2 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 5 a i 2 9 2 NUM OF INSPS 42 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 3 3 2 1 EXPOSURE SUMMARY: SUBSTANCES NUM OF MEAN MAX TEST SAMPS 3 3 51 11 12 26 2 2 22 2 3 2 1 1 8 9 1 2 11 25 2 3 26 10 NUH OF TEST SAHPS 87 3 6 5 2 2 2 5 1 3 3 1 4 1 4 4 3 3 PROPTN OF PEL 0.00 0.08 0.31 1.59 0.80 0. 18 0.07 0.00 0.01 0.05 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.09 0.03 0.00 0.06 0.15 2.55 0.02 0.75 0.47 unn/\n T . ou MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.75 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 2. 35 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.37 8.55 0. 15 0.06 PROPTN OF PEL 0.00 0.17 2.90 10.00 2. 10 2.20 0.12 0.00 0.17 0.10 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.34 0.03 0.00 0. 18 0.88 2.70 0.05 3.31 1.52 OCT AMITC Do 1 ArH_»C O MAX PROPTN OF PEL 42.00 0.03 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.02 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.56 42.00 0.31 0.08 USED IN SIC=3MMU NUM INSP NUM OF W SOME SMP>PEL 0 0 3 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 1 iicrn i u cir* u UotU In o I L.— J1 NUH INSP W SOME SMP>PEL 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 INSP W MEAN>PEL 0 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 |AO ________ NUH OF INSP W HEAN>PEL 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 0 0 5 6 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 6 1 NUH OF SAHPS OVR PEL 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 image: ------- HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 > N> SUBST 1790 IB'lO 2037 2(460 21470 21490 2590 2610 9010 9020 9130 SUBST 230 1430 1435 l|60 •490 1491 685 686 690 730 731 790 860 865 1033 1037 1170 1275 1280 1371 111 30 114(40 1(460 1520 1560 1590 1591 1620 1730 18(40 NUM OF INSPS 1 1 2 2 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 NUM OF INSPS 2142 1 1 1 1 14 6 214 23 1 1 2 i 12 7 1 2 1 7 1 2 2 15 tAruuuKt o NUM OF TEST SAMPS 3 3 3 9 1 1 7 1 1 14 2 NUM OF TEST SAMPS 509 2 1 3 3 6 a 5' 51 21) 214 5 18 3 2 3 3 3 2 1 14 27 17 1 3 2 12 1 i| 14 29 unnAnr: au MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.00 0.00 0. 114 0.08 0.00 0.06 0.05 0.51 O.M1 O.O'l 0.014 unn/\ni, ou MEAN PROP1N OF PEL 0.20 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.03 0.01 0.05 0.09 0.02 0.09 0.06 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.07 0.13 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.05 1.01 0.23 0. 10 0.51 0.014 BSIANUtb U MAX PROPTN OF PEL 0.00 0.01 0.23 0.50 0.00 0.06 0.15 0.51 0.141 0. 1U 0.05 HCTAUrTQ 1 DO 1 MrC^LO I MAX PROPTN OF PEL 114. 10 0.00 0.02 0.05 0.00 0. 10 0.014 1.10 0.86 0.20 1.70 0. 10 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.09 1.23 0.07 0.00 0.01 0.05 1 1 . (|0 0.23 2.80 1.33 .0.89 SlU IN MIU= NUM INSP W SOME SMP>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Qrn i u c i r*— ot.u in o i L*— NUM INSP W SOME SMP>PEL 114 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 .JMOy NUM OF INSP W MEAN>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUM OF INSP W MEAN>PEL 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS CVR PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 image: ------- INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTV EMPLOYMENT US OSMA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 SUBST 18142 I860 2020 2085 21MO 22MO 2260 2310 2370 21430 2U31 21(60 2il90 2570 2590 2610 2611 2612 9010 9130 9135 SUBST 160 170 230 1430 •435 l^^Q '160 •477 (491 527 590 6PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 3M71 NUM OF INSP W MEAN>PEL O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 (4 0 2 USED IN SIC ill 79 — — •»•» — ••• — •» NUM INSP NUH OF W SOME SMP>PEL a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 INSP W MEAN>PEL 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 image: ------- HEAL III HAZARD EXPOSURES INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLAHA CNTY EMPLOYMENT US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 SUBST 1030 1037 1040 1060 1073 1170 1360 1385 1430 1460 1520 1560 1567 1590 1591 1620 1690 1720 1730 1810 1860 2020 2037 2085 2260 2280 2310 2460 2470 2502 2505 2584 2590 2610 2611 8880 9010 9015 9020 9130 9135 NUM OF INSPS 1 4 1 2 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 t| 4 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 3 2 a 9 1 1 1 1 8 8 4 1 3 1 1 4 1 tAruouHt a NUM OE TEST SAMPS 1 7 1 3 4 1 2 1 5 1 1 1 5 10 8 1 1 2 4 4 1 2 7 1 4 4 12 25 8 5 1 1 19 23 12 1 5 2 1 5 1 unn«nr: uu MEAN PROP IN OF PEL 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.05 0.05 0. 19 0.00 0.23 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.47 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.09 0.04 0.00 O.OM 0.01 0. 17 0.09 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.04 0. 16 0.05 0.46 0.00 7.32 0.00 0.00 0.13 1.90 Ob 1 ANULa U MAX PROP1N OF PEL 0.00 0.07 0.04 0.00 0.90 0.00 0.06 0.05 0.43 0.00 0.23 0.04 0.00 0.04 0.09 0.47 0.00 0.04 0. 13 0.01 0.00 0. 14 0. 13 0.00 0.08 0.02 0.71 0.71 1.10 0.00 0.00 0.04 1.68 0.34 4.70 0.00 21.80 0.00 0.00 0.30 1.90 atu in an,-.! NUM INSP H SOME SMP>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 NUM OF INSP W MEAN>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 image: ------- INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 I --J Ul SU8ST 40 320 430 460 491 685 686 690 710 720 730 731 1037 1073 1080 1280 1377 1385 1430 1520 1590 1591 1610 1620 1720 1842 1980 2037 2240 2270 2430 2440 2460 2470 2490 2584 2587 2590 2610 2611 5010 9010 9020 9130 NUM OF INSPS 109 1 3 2 1 1 4 2 3 1 1 1 6 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 14 2 6 1 2 3 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 7 1 2 1 2 10 6 1 2 1 1 3 EXPOSURE SUMMARY: SUBSTANCES USED IN SIC=3M99 NUM OF MEAN MAX NUM INSP NUM OF TEST SAMPS 190 4 4 3 1 1 4 2 4 3 1 1 11 1 2 3 2 1 1 2 31 a 10 2 2 4 3 1 3 1 2 1 1 14 1 2 2 5 17 1 1 2 3 1 1 11 PROPTN OF PEL 0.29 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.05 0.01 0. 13 0. 10 0.03 0.36 0.09 0.00 0.02 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 2.52 1 .39 0.01 0.01 0.39 0.05 0.21 0.43 0.00 0.05 0.02 0.00 0.04 0.00 0. 13 0.00 O.O/ 0.20 0.45 0. 19 0.21 0.53 0.00 0.45 PROPTN OF PEL 5.02 0.00 0.05 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.04 .0. 10 0.04 0.23 0. 10 0.03 1.30 0.09 0.00 0.03 0. 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.77 5.02 4.40 0.01 0.02 0.97 0. 10 0.21 1.01 0.00 0.05 0.02 0.00 0. 16 0.00 0. 18 0.00 0.21 1.64 1.46 0.21 0.55 0.53 0.00 0.98 W SOME SMP>PEL 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 INSP W MEAN>PEL 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 HUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 image: ------- HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CN1Y EMPLOYMENT US OStIA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 SUBST 260 320 1491 685 686 710 720 731 907 1520 1522 1591 1610 1791 18142 22'IO 2'l60 2571 2590 2620 9020 9135 SUBST 1430 1491 685 686 690 720 731 907 1520 1590 1591 1620 1730 2037 2310 25/0 2610 5010 NUM OF INSPS 29 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 NUM OF INSPS 25 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 LAfUbUHL NUM OF TEST SAMPS 82 2 3 14 8 14 1 8 3 *4 14 2 7 2 1 3 1 l| 14 3 1 1 12 ry pACIIDr LAruounc NUM OF TEST SAMPS 55 5 1 14 2 1 5 3 1 6 1 >4 1 1 1 1 14 2 2 MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0. 10 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.314 0.05 0.32 0.00 0.014 O.O'I 0.22 0.01 0.00 0.145 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0. 16 CIIMMARV • ounrtMn i . MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.85 0.714 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0. 11 0.142 0.00 0. 13 3.00 2.3M 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.25 auobi ANiyta MAX PROP1N OF PEL 0.87 0.02 0.03 0.00 0.07 0.06 0.314 0.21 0.62 0.00 0.06 0.04 0.1414 0.01 0.00 0.6U 0.00 0.87 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.35 <*IIRPEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •) 1 1 NUM OF INSP W MEAN>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUM INSP NUM OF W SOME SMP>PEL 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INSP W MEAN>PEL 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 image: ------- INDUSTRIES Wllll MICH SCLARA CNIV EMPLOYMENT US OSIIA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 I -J EXPOSURE SUBST NUM OF NUM OF INSPS TEST SAMPS 9010 1 5 9020 1 5 SUBST NUM OF NUM OF INSPS TEST SAMPS 31 77 310 1 1 U9I 14 9 690 1 1 720 M 16 730 790 1366 1380 114MO 1520 1591 16?0 18'42 19M2 2037 2085 22t40 ! 2310 2570 2587 2590 5010 I 9010 9130 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 3 1 2 1 ' H 1 2 1 2 20 1 1 SUBST NUM OF NUM OF INSPS TEST SAMPS 60 119 230 1 1 360 1 1 1430 2 3 685 14 6 700 2 3 7?0 1 1 SUMMARY: SUBSTANCES MEAN MAX PROP IN PROPTN OF PEL OF PEL 10.76 30.80 0.02 0.05 QIIMMARV • CIIQCT AUr*C*C ounnART . OUDO i Ant_*c.o MEAN MAX PROPTN PROPTN OF PEL OF PEL 0.1(8 6.80 O.UO 0.140 0.19 0.1414 0.00 0.00 0.90 5.50 0.02 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.114 0.25 0.06 0.07 0 . 00 0 . 00 0.72 0.72 0.12 0.12 0.28 0.28 0.01 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6 . 80 6 . 80 0.00 0.01 0.3U 1.00 1.50 1.50 0.32 0.32 CIIMMAR V • QlltlQT AUrTC ounriAR T . oUDo I Ani> t_ a MEAN MAX PROPTN PROPTN OF PEL OF PEL 0.21 3.32 0. 1 / 0.17 0.32 0.32 0.15 0.28 0.01 0.02 0.39 0.85 0.00 0.00 USED IN SIC- NUM INSP W SOME SMP>PEL 1 35M1 NUM OF INSP W HEAN>PEL 1 0 0 NUM INSP NUM OF W SOME SMP>PEL 14 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 II c c~ n i u c i r* — uocu in o 1 1_>— NUM INSP W SOME SMP>PEL 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 INSP W MEAN>PEL 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 NUM OF INSP W MEAN>PEL 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUH OF SAMPS OVR PEL 2 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 5 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 image: ------- HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTV EMPLOYMENT US OSIIA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 SUBST 730 731 1040 1050 1280 1460 1520 1590 1591 1610 1660 1730 1840 2390 2460 2584 2590 2610 5010 9010 9020 9130 9135 1 00 SUBST 160 227 230 430 490 491 685 686 690 700 726 730 731 790 874 1385 1520 1530 NUM OF INSPS 2 5 1 1 2 1 8 2 5 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 3 2 2 2 NUM OF INSPS 125 3 7 3 2 3 1 5 6 1 1 1 10 1 tAfUSUHL NUM OF TEST SAMPS 2 a 2 16 4 1 18 4 6 5 1 1 1 1 5 2 2 3 1 11 5 2 3 NUM OF TEST SAMPS 387 1 1 1 1 3 3 23 3 2 7 1 15 19 1 2 2 44 1 aunn«nr: ou MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.61 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0. 19 0.00 0.69 0.01 0. 18 0.06 0.00 0.21 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.52 0.01 0.03 0.21 CIIMMARV • Qll oupinMn i * ou MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.22 0.30 0.00 0.00 3.01 0.00 0.15 0.05 0.02 0.00 0.22 0.01 0.03 0.17 0.00 0.43 O.OO 0. 15 0.00 DOIMNULO U MAX PROPTN OF PEL 1.23 0.89 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.79 0.00 3.06 0.02 0. 18 0.06 0.00 0.21 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 3.32 0.06 0.06 0.38 DCTAUprC II D3|Mrilf[.O U MAX PROPTN OF PEL 8.40 0.30 0.00 0.00 3.01 0.00 0.46 0.78 0.03 0.00 0.88 0.01 0.25 0.79 0.00 0.86 0.00 1.70 0.00 3LU in a it,- NUM INSP W SOME SMP>PEL 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 crn 1 U «1 1 P- OC.LJ in o 1 1>~ NUM INSP W SOME SMP>PEL 11 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 jjpy NUM OF INSP W MEAN>PEL 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 NUM OF INSP W MEAN>PEL 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 25 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 image: ------- INDUS1RIES WI1II HIGH SCLARA CNTV EMPLOYMENT US OSMA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 EXPOSURE SUMMARY: SUBST NUH OF NUH OF HEAN INSPS TEST SAHPS 1590 2 3 1591 13 18 1610 1620 1670 1730 1791 1810 1812 1912 2037 2038 2010 2217 2210 2260 2130 2131 2110 2160 2510 2570 . 2590 •** 2610 ' 5010 2 31 1 1 3 12 20 1 5 1 3 t 1 1 d i 2 9 1 1 9 U 5 2 9010 1 57 9130 1 8 9135 2 12 SUBST NUH OF NUH OF INSPS TEST SAHPS 51 131 10 1 5 130 1 3 685 5 12 686 3 5 690 3 12 730 2 9 731 1 5 1290 2 8 1110 1 1 1520 5 17 1590 1 3 1591 1 11 1620 3 6 PROPTN OF PEL 0.00 0.66 0.00 0 . 01 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.02 0.09 0. 18 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0. 13 1.90 0.10 0.29 unnAnT . HEAN PROPIN OF PEL 2.56 0.11 0. 17 0. 16 1.00 0.05 0. 19 0.52 0.61 0.00 0. 15 0.23 30. 36 0.06 SUBSTANCES HAX PROPTN OF PEL 0.00 8.10 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.11 0.55 0. 18 0.07 0.02 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.05 0. 16 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.01 0.31 5.63 1.36 1.73 Clinc T AUfTC oUtSo 1 AWLiLo HAX PROPTN OF PEL 63.80 0.96 0.11 0.67 2.37 0.29 1.96 1.11 1. 16 0.00 0.90 0.50 63.80 0. 15 USED IN SIC=3561 NUH INSP NUH OF W SOME SHP>PEL 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 Hern i u c i r* n UoLU IN blL>-J NUH INSP W SOHE SHP>PEL 9 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 INSP W HEAN>PEL 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 iŁn _ NUH OF INSP W HEAN>PEL 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 NUH OF SAHPS OVR PEL 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 1 2 NUH OF SAHPS OVR PEL 15 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 9 0 image: ------- HFALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 00 o SUBST 1710 18MO 18'l2 20l|0 2MUO 2'|60 21470 2610 2651 9020 9130 SUBST 146 260 <430 »435 1)91 666 830 1037 1073 1110 1290 1520 1538 1590 1591 22»40 2310 21431 2«470 2490 9130 NUM OF INSPS 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 U NUM OF INSPS 27 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 tAruaunt. a NUM OF TEST SAMPS 1 2 3 14 1 3 9 rwpn^imr PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUM OF INSP W MEAN>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUM INSP NUM OF W SOME SMP>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INSP W MEAN>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 image: ------- I CO INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT US OSIIA INSPECTIONS '1979 THRU 1982 SUBST HO 320 360 U30 H91 685 686 690 720 730 731 1080 1280 1'I30 1M60 1520 1590 1591 1610 1620 1720 1735 18>tO 1B'I2 1860 2020 2037 22'lQ 2329 21(30 2ll60 2M90 2505 2590 2610 5010 9010 9020 9130 9135 NUN OF INSPS 116 1 1 1 1 ^ 3 5 6 2 3 9 1 3 2 2 12 1 5 1 5 1 1 5 2 1 1 3 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 5 2 3 5 5 1 NUN OF MEAN MAX NUH 1 NSP NUM OF TEST SAMPS 275 5 5 3 5 10 7 7 11 2 7 19 1 8 3 7 26 7 28 1 13 14 2 8 7 2 5 9 9 2 1 9 (4 1 2 6 t| 8 9 7 1 PROPTN OF PEL 0.27 0.03 0.01 0.00 0. 10 0.05 0.03 0.33 0.0(4 0.01 0.05 0.17 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.30 0.07 0.89 0.02 0.014 0.00 0.86 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 M. 72 0.02 0. 31 0.20 PROPTN OF PEL 12.70 0.05 0.01 0.00 0.32 0.32 0.2*4 1.20 0.30 0.03 0. 18 0.6(4 0.01 0.06 0.02 0.00 1.30 0.38 M.02 0.02 0. 16 0.00 1.32 0.06 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.39 0.00 0.00 1.07 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.0>4 0.00 12.70 0. 1U 2.50 0.20 W SOME SMP>PEL 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 INSP W MEAN>PEL 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 NUH OF SAMPS OVR PEL 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 8 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 image: ------- HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 I CD SUBST 523 686 18(40 2580 SUBST (46 230 260 320 360 1430 14110 U60 1491 685 686 730 731 1013 1037 10140 1080 1290 1385 1520 1590 1591 1720 1730 17714 1980 2085 2216 2227 22(40 2260 2280 2310 2M30 2(460 2M70 NUM OF INSPS 5 1 1 1 2 NUM OF INSPS 89 1 1 2 1 1 t| 1 1 2 2 14 2 3 8 12 2 3 2 1 (4 5 3 tAruiurtt a NUM OF TEST SAMPS 7 1 1 2 3 FXPPI^IIRF <« (.ArUOUFtC. 3 NUM OF TEST SAMPS 2(43 3 2 5 3 1 6 2 2 15 3 6 9 5 1 1 1 1 2 (4 (4 28 58 2 7 1 1 1 2 2 9 1 (4 1 17 11 5 MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.2] 0. 10 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.05 0.05 0.65 0.01 1.09 0.14(4 1.145 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0. 12 0.00 0.73 0.142 0.02 0.29 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.21 0.03 0.30 0.07 0.00 0.0(4 0. 10 UblANULS U MAX PROPTN OF PEL 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 QCTAUprC II DolAniftO U MAX PROPTN OF PEL 23.014 0.16 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.2(4 0.05 0.05 14.90 O.OU 6.30 1.15 2. 10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.05 0.33 0.00 23.0(4 0.75 0.09 0.29 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.90 0.03 0.71 O.07 0.01 0. 1 1 0.57 btu in aii>=3i NUM INSP H SOME SMP>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 cm i M Q i c— \t 3C.U Irl O 1 v»— 31 NUM INSP W SOME SHP>PEL 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •*•>Ł. NUM OF INSP W MEAN>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 i»A9 ________ NUH OF INSP W MEAN>PEL 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 0 0 0 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (4 0 2 2 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o image: ------- INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCIARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT US OSIIA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 CD U) EXPOSURE SUMMARY: SUBSTANCES SUBST NUM OF NUM OF MEAN MAX INSPS TEST SAMPS 2510 1 1 2580 1 2 2590 5 10 2610 1 1 9130 1 2 9135 1 1 SUBST NUM OF NUM OF INSPS TEST SAMPS 130 318 10 2 3 230 1 2 260 1 17 360 2 25 100 1 1 135 2 1 110 3 8 160 1 1 177 1 1 190 2 6 191 685 690 730 731 790 871 887 922 1033 1037 1010 1075 1080 1285 1290 1300 1385 1120 1130 1110 1160 1170 15?0 1 8 2 7 1 1 2 2 2 1 6 1 5 1 3 2 5 3 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1560 7 19 PROPTN OF 0 0 0 0 0 0 HUM A PEL .00 .00 .03 .01 .05 .00 MEAN PROPTN OF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PEL .08 .00 .00 .03 .39 .00 .01 .01 .00 .00 .05 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .02 .00 .01 .01 .01 .05 .00 .03 .00 .01 .00 .02 .00 . 31 . 11 PROPTN OF 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. OCT Ah Do I An MAX PEL 00 00 05 01 06 00 f*f C USED IN SIC=3662 NUH INSP NUM OF W SOME SMP>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 INSP W MEAN>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUH INSP NUM OF PROPTN OF 16. 0. 0. 0. 16. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1 . 1 . PEL 50 00 00 20 50 00 01 06 00 00 20 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 06 00 05 01 02 06 00 05 00 02 00 05 00 00 12 W SOME SMP>PEL 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t INSP W MEAN>PEL 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUM PEL OF SAMPS OVR 11 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 PEL image: ------- HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES INDUSTRIES Ml 111 HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 I 00 SUBST 1590. 1591 1620 1660 1720 1730 1840 1812 1860 1920 2020 2080 2085 2180 2240 2260 2310 2430 2460 2485 2490 2570 2590 2610 9010 9020 9090 9130 9135 SUBST 20 40 160 170 190 230 260 320 430 435 440 460 NUM OF INSPS 5 13 1 2 6 1 2 2 1 1 4 1 2 1 1 2 2 4 1 2 2 1 4 3 2 1 1 2 1 NUM OF INSPS 253 1 1 1 4 1 2 2 3 10 6 3 1 tAKUbUKt b NUM OF TEST SAMPS 14 37 2 2 13 1 3 2 1 4 a 4 2 5 1 2 a 6 4 4 2 2 a 13 3 1 2 2 1 NUM OF TEST SAMPS 581 1 1 1 6 2 5 7 4 19 14 3 2 lUMMAHY: bU MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.09 0. 10 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 11 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.02 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.06 o.oa 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.05 0.01 UPIFlAn T * 3U MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.09 0.27 0.00 0.04 0. 1 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 O.O2 0.03 0.00 HblAMUtb U MAX PROPTN OF PEL 0. 16 5.00 0.00 0.09 0.31 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 1.34 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.04 o.oa 0.00 0.03 0.16 0. 14 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.09 0.01 OCTAIJppC II DDIMnlsC-O U MAX PROPTN OF PEL 6.91 0.27 0.00 0.04 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.20 0.05 0.00 btu IN blU-J NUM INSP W SOME SMP>PEL 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 crn tu LLJ in o 1 l_»— J NUM INSP W SOME SMP>PEL 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b/M NUM OF INSP W MEAN>PEL 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A7O ________ NUM OF INSP W MEAN>PEL 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 image: ------- I 00 US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 SUBST NUM OF NUM OF MEAN MAX NUM INSP NUM OF INSPS TEST SAMPS '190 1 3 (491 (4 13 570 1 1 6M5 2 6 682 2 2 685 3 5 686 690 710 720 730 731 790 830 930 950 990 1010 10H4 1030 1033 1037 lO'lO 1073 1220 1 1 2 5 19 3 3 5 3 1 1 5 3 1 3 3 2 1 3 1280 <4 14 1290 5 11 1300 1 2 1385 2 «4 UI30 2 3 UltO 2 2 Hl60 2 1>470 1 1500 1 1515 2 1520 2 5 153*4 2 1538 1 1560 M 7 1590 20 59 1591 21 65 1620 2 12 1631 2 7 16143 1 3 1720 6 18 1730 6 10 1732 1 2 1791 1 1 1BUO 5 12 18M2 2 7 PROPTN OF 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. PEL 00 03 00 00 02 00 00 00 21 06 39 07 01 38 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 07 00 01 10 0*4 02 6<4 00 00 10 50 00 01 00 00 33 07 02 36 56 00 12 16 00 00 00 O'l PROPTN OF 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 2. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1 . 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 1 . 2. 0. 2. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. PEL 00 18 00 00 05 01 00 00 23 20 014 12 01 88 03 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 02 07 00 02 23 06 014 29 00 00 10 50 00 01 00 00 25 06 61 65 60 00 29 51 00 00 014 25 W SOME SMP>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INSP W MEAN>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 image: ------- HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTV EMPLOYMENT US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 SUBST 1860 2020 2037 2180 2240 2260 2280 2310 2390 2430 2432 2460 2470 2485 2490 2570 2590 2602 2610 2650 5010 9010 9020 > 9130 i 9135 SUBST 40 230 260 310 320 430 435 440 460 480 491 527 560 59O 612 685 NUM OF INSPS 1 1 4 1 3 1 1 4 2 10 1 14 1 5 1 1 11 1 4 1 1 1 2 6 1 NUH OF INSPS 149 2 1 3 1 2 4 1 4 4 2 tXKUbUItt NUM OF TEST SAMPS 2 2 7 1 a 1 2 8 5 21 5 26 2 9 4 3 21 1 17 3 2 1 4 21 2 NUM OF TEST SAMPS 410 4 4 9 1 16 1 2 6 bUMMANY: bU MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.00 0.05 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.25 1.08 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.27 0.04 0.44 0.05 ^IIMMARV • Qll OUFIFIMIAT • OU MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 O.05 UbIANOtb U MAX PROPTN OF PEL 0.00 0.06 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 1.72 0.02 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.83 1.57 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.20 0.27 0.23 6.91 0.06 t)OIAnl»td U MAX PROPTN OF PEL 19.61 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.02 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.22 btU IN bll,- NUM INSP W SOME SMP>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 NUM INSP W SOME SMP>PEL a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 ittlt NUM OF INSP W MEAN>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 NUM OF INSP W MEAN>PEL 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 image: ------- I CD -J SUBST 686 690 720 730 731 810 817 860 1033 1037 1010 1060 1073 1280 1300 1380 1385 1520 1522 1536 1560 1590 1591 1595 1620 1650 1790 1810 1812 1980 2033 2037 2012 2210 2270 2280 2160 2170 2190 2587 2590 2610 261 1 2612 9020 9030 9130 9135 NUM OF INSPS 5 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 2 1 1 3 6 1 2 1 6 15 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 a 3 i i 6 3 1 2 1 1 6 3 INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTV EMPLOYMENT US OSIIA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 NUM OF MEAN TEST PROPTN SAMPS OF PEL 6 2 1 16 15 1 2 3 1 7 5 1 5 3 3 1 7 35 2 3 1 23 M 6 2 16 i* 6 5 6 2 1 2 2 1 3 1 31 14 1 1 16 16 5 I 3 1 a 3 0.86 0.06 0.00 0.13 0.23 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.31 0.02 3.23 0.01 0.00 0.17 0. 10 0.00 0.00 1.08 0.00 0.01 0. 10 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.50 0.08 0.11 0.01 0.00 0.03 0.27 0.03 0.07 0.01 0.01 O.OO 0. 39 0. 10 0. 17 STANCES MAX PROPTN OF PEL (4.26 0.09 0.00 0.9«4 0.61 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.014 0.00 1.75 0.07 1.80 0.01 0.00 0.70 0. 10 0.00 0.00 9. 18 19.61 0.00 0.20 0.26 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.50 0.15 0.11 0.58 0.00 0.03 0.27 0. 13 0.12 0. 10 0.01 0.00 0.39 0. 19 0.29 USED IN SIC= NUM INSP W SOME SMP>PEL 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 3711 NUM OF INSP W MEAN>PEL 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • NUH OF SAMPS OVR PEL 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 image: ------- MLALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES INDUSTRIES WITH MICK SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 CD 00 SUBST 360 1490 1073 1377 1720 1730 2U70 9010 SUBST 320 360 1430 1435 1460 1491 686 690 731 1520 1536 1560 1590 1591 1620 1720 1790 1791 18140 2037 2'460 2M 70 2"490 2590 2610 9010 9015 9020 9130 9135 9210 NUM OF INSPS 8 NUH OF INSPS 53 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 14 1 2 i 3 2 2 1 2 14 2 1 tXKUbUKt NUM OF TEST SAMPS 29 18 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 NUM OF TEST SAMPS 103 2 2 2 1 2 1 3 14 2 5 1 2 15 1 3 2 1 1 2 1 5 2 2 3 2 8 7 3 12 1) 2 OUMPIANY: ou MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0. 13 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 19 0.17 0.00 0.00 miMMAR V * <\li ounriMn i • ou MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.05 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 11 0.05 0.02 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.02 0.07 0.00 0.0'4 0.05 0.01 0.00 0. 72 0.61 1. 114 0.51 u:>l ANL.tb u MAX PROPTN OF PEL 14.63 14.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.29 0.00 0.00 ocTAurri u DOIAf1l>C.O U MAX PROPTN OF PEL 2.03 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.05 0.05 1. 16 0.00 0.014 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.09 0.00 0.08 0. 10 0.02 0.00 1.53 1.39 2.03 0.66 StU IN blU=J NUM INSP H SOME SMP>PEL 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <^rn IN PEL 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 rt>» NUM OF INSP W MEAN>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUM OF INSP W MEAN>PEL 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 0 image: ------- I 00 IO SUBST no 230 <430 «435 «491 560 685 686 690 731 830 931 1037 10140 1060 1170 1371 1380 1520 1534 7 2 0. 18 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.08 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.145 0.09 0.00 0.02 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 10 0. 10 0.00 0.«47 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 O.U2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 13 0.07 0.00 0.61 0.141 0.00 O.OU 0. 13 O.OU 0. 33 0.81 1TANCES MAX PROPTN OF PEL 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.09 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.«47 0.13 0.00 0.05 0.6M 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.17 0.00 3.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.13 0.00 1.59 2.89 0.00 0.08 0. 15 0.16 0.70 1.23 USED IN SIC= NUH INSP W SOME SMP>PEL 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 =3999 HUM OF INSP W MEAN>PEL 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 image: ------- HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES INDUSTRIES Wllll HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1962 SUBST (430 1|'40 700 10140 1385 1710 1720 1730 2020 2280 2460 21490 SUBST 686 1591 SUBST 260 320 1491 630 631 685 690 730 731 680 1325 1520 1590 1591 16?0 IB'lO 18M2 NUM OF INSPS 13 2 NUM OF INSPS 2 1 1 NUM OF INSPS 58 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 5 1 1 6 11 9 1 2 1 txrubuiit NUM OF TEST SAMPS 2»4 2 1 2 1 1 9 NUM OF TEST SAMPS 2 1 1 HUM OF TEST SAMPS 19>4 25 1 3 2 2 2 <4 1 9 1 1 13 70 3M 2 l| 1 iUMMAHY I MEAN PROPIN OF PEL 0. 16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.07 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.97 CIIUMARV • OUnriAn T * MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.00 0.00 0.00 MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 1.2«4 0.03 0.00 0. 19 0.00 0.00 0.5M 0.00 0.61 1.06 0.00 0.00 0.56 2.91 2.72 O.OO O.l<3 2.35 bUBSI ANUtS MAX PROPfN OF PEL 3 . 90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.014 0.07 O.O'l 0.00 0.00 3.90 CllflCT AUPf*C 3UDO 1 MrH-»C.o MAX PROPTN OF PEL 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAX PROPTN OF PEL 26.23 0.20 0.00 0.5*4 0.00 0.00 1.08 0.00 0.61 2.80 0.00 0.00 2. 11 26.23 15.22 0.00 0.91 2.35 UStU in aiL.= Dl NUM INSP W SOME SMP>PEL 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUM OF INSP W MEAN>PEL 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 NUM INSP NUM OF W SOME INSP W SMP>PEL 0 0 MEAN>PEL 0 0 0 0 NUM INSP NUM OF H SOME INSP W SMP>PEL 21 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 10 6 0 0 1 MEAN>PEL 19 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 8 6 0 0 1 NUM OF SAMPS OVH PEL 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 0 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 67 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 37 214 0 0 1 image: ------- INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTY CMPLOYHENT US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 SUBST 2310 2582 2590 2610 9020 9135 SUBST . 1)0 320 >430 (460 560 685 686 687 690 700 720 1380 1590 1591 1720 19UO 2037 20»iO 2270 21)60 2PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 iicm in c i f* tii UoLU IN 5>lt»-5. NUH INSP W SOME SHP>PEL 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 INSP W 1 MEAN>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUH OF INSP W HEAN>PEL 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUH OF SAMPS OVR PEL 10 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 image: ------- HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLAHA CNTY EMPLOYMENT US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1962 SUBST 1310 2037 2360 SUBST 9010 9020 > K> SUBST 190 320 1430 570 1590 2020 2037 2270 2*490 SUBST 731 667 1591 1631 17?0 1730 22MO NUM or INSPS NUM OF INSPS 2 1 1 NUM OF INSPS 27 18 1 1 1 NUM OF INSPS 13 ^PUbUHt NUM OF TEST SAMPS <4 2 1 1 f pr\Qi IQP IrUOUKt NUM OF TEST SAMPS 3 1 2 f PHQIIRT krUoUnu NUM OF TEST SAMPS 66 3 1 1 3 1 2 50 2 2 1 rpftClia r LrUoUnC. NUM OF TEST SAMPS 38 3 14 2 5 3 5 3 aurwiAKt : MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.03 0.00 0.00 0. 10 MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.00 0.00 0.00 MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.*47 1.09 0.07 0.20 0.00 QHMMAft V • aunnnn • • MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.21 0.0<4 0.00 0.25 1 .90 O.OO O.ll'l 0.00 SUUai ANL,t3 MAX PROPTN OF PEL 0. 10 0.00 0.00 0. 10 MAX PROPTN OF PEL 0.00 0.00 0.00 MAX PROPTN OF PEL 9.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 9.98 0. 15 0.21 0.00 ClIQC T AUPT Q dUD3 1 Mrl^jt J MAX PROPTN OF PEL 3. 70 0.05 0.00 O.'tO 3.70 O.01 0.76 O.OO USLU in oii»- NUM INSP W SOME SMP>PEL 0 0 0 DDHI NUM OF INSP W MEAN>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 NUM INSP NUM OF W SOME INSP W SMP>PEL 0 0 HEAN>PEL 0 0 0 0 NUM INSP NUM OF W SOME INSP W SMP>PEL 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 NUM INSP W SOME SMP>PEL 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 MEAN>PEL 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 "7 3I|O ___ __ NUM OF INSP W MEAN>PEL 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 0 0 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 0 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL », 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 image: ------- I VO U) SU8ST 2260 2M60 2570 2610 9020 SUBST 270 1011 1M30 I860 9010 SUBST 1190 1660 1730 9020 SUBST NUM OF INSPS 1 1 1 1 2 NUM OF INSPS 5 1 1 1 1 1 NUM OF INSPS 5 1 1 1 2 NUM OF INSPS 731 1520 1590 1920 2'l85 9010 INDUSTRIES WITH MICH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT US OSIIA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1983 NUM OF MEAN TEST PROPTN SAMPS OF PEL 2 6 1 1 3 NUM OF TEST SAMPS NUH OF TEST SAMPS 9 1 2 2 <4 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.00 MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.03 0.00 NUM OF TEST SAMPS 16 1 2 0 2 2 1 SUMMARY: 5 MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.92 0. 30 O.MO 2.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 STANCES MAX PROPTN OF PEL O.OU 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.00 USED IN SIC=73«49 NUM INSP NUM OF W SOME SMP>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 INSP W MEAN>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 0 0 0 0 0 MAX PROPTN OF PEL 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 NUM INSP NUM OF W SOME SMP>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 INSP W MEAN>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 MAX PROPTN OF PEL O.OU 0.00 0.02 0.0«t 0.00 NUM INSP NUM OF W SOME SMP>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 INSP W MEAN>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 0 0 0 0 0 MAX PROPTN OF PEL m.eo 0.30 0.58 1M.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 NUH INSP NUM OF W SOME SMP>PEL 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 INSP W MEAN>PEL 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 image: ------- HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1962 tAruaunt. SUBST NUM OF NUM OF INSPS TEST SAMPS 19 37 20 3 9 170 1 3 1290 2 5 1385 2 1120 1 1776 2 2260 1 2290 1 2310 1 2160 3 1 2510 1 1 2590 3 1 ___________ — — — _ rw pnciinc' SUBST NUM OF NUH OF INSPS TEST SAMPS 23 33 10 1 1 260 2 1 191 690 710 1110 1380 1591 1631 1890 1903 2020 2210 2160 9010 2 9013 9015 9017 9020 2 2 1 1 1 5 2 2 2 1 9130 2 2 aunnani: au MEAN PROP IN OF PEL 0.09 0.21 0.02 0.08 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.08 0.09 0.01 QIIUI4APV * PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 fyj -------- NUM OF INSP W MEAN>PEL- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUM INSP NUM OF W SOME SMP>PEL 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 INSP W MEAN>PEL 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 image: ------- INDUSTRIES WIIH HIGH SCLARA CNTV EMPLOYMENT US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 EXPOSURE SUBST NUM OF NUM OF INSPS TEST SAMPS 30 61 170 220 270 130 1010 1060 1190 1300 1385 1531 1560 1590 1591 1620 1631 1720 2037 2170 2180 2215 2310 2160 2505 2590 5010 2 2 1 3 1 2 3 2 1 2 6 1 2 1 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 6 1 2 1 9020 2 5 9135 1 1 SUBST NUM OF NUM OF INSPS TEST SAMPS 51 115 10 3 7 360 1 3 130 3 3 191 1 6 590 1 5 685 2 9 687 1 2 690 1 1 730 1 2 1380 1 1 15?0 3 9 1590 1 6 1591 7 21 SUMMARY: MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.13 0.09 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.08 1.13 0.13 0. 11 0.09 0.06 0.26 0.17 0.00 0.27 0.05 0.00 0.05 0. 12 0.03 0.05 0.07 0. 11 0.00 0.17 0.00 0. 19 SUMMARY: MEAN PROPtN OF PEL 0.57 0.00 7.85 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.09 0.21 0.26 1 .07 0.00 0.15 0. 30 2.5? SUBSTANCES MAX PROPTN OF PEL 1.39 0. 11 0.00 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.09 1.39 0.17 0.21 0. 18 0. 12 0.26 0.91 0.00 0.31 0.05 0.00 0.06 0. 11 0.03 0.05 0.21 0.22 0.00 0. 17 0.00 0.19 SUBSTANCES MAX PROPTN OF PEL 16.10 0.03 23.50 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.51 0.22 0.26 2.13 0.00 6.00 1 . 18 16. '10 USED IN SIC=7399 NUM INSP NUM OF W SOME SMP>PEL 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 USED IN SIC=7 NUM INSP W SOME SMP>PEL 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 INSP W HEAN>PEL 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 4 A ____»»__ NUM OF INSP W MEAN>PEL 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 3 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 5 image: ------- HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 SUBST NUM Or INSPS 1620 1730 2037 2170 2270 2460 5 2590 5 2612 1 9020 9 SUBST NUM or INSPS 48 260 1 320 1 <430 491 570 620 670 731 1037 1290 1385 1520 2 1590 5 1591 7 1620 1720 1730 2037 2260 2460 2 2490 1 2590 2 2611 2 9020 1 1 tAruaurtt a NUM or TEST SAMPS 2 1 1 1 1 9 9 2 14 NUH or TEST SAMPS 122 14 4 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 3 10 32 1 1 1 14 1 6 1 6 5 20 unriANY: au MEAN PROPTN or PEL 0.02 0.20 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.07 0.01 0.00 0.00 MEAN PROPTN or PEL 0. 18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.05 0. 12 0.57 0. 49 0.03 0.17 0.03 0.37 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.04 0.24 0.05 tJSIANlta U MAX PROPfN or PCL 0.03 0.20 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.2J 0.03 0.00 0.01 nCTAIJf*C"C || DolArll'C.a U MAX PROPTN or PEL 3.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.21 1.58 3.60 0.03 0.17 0.03 0.57 0.00 0.11 0.00 0. 10 0.56 0.47 atu in aiu NUM INSP W SOME SMP>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cm i u Q i r* OLU in 3 1 u NUM INSP W SOME SMP>PEL 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUM or INSP W MEAN>PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •jc in __ NUM or INSP W MEAN>PEL 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUM or SAMPS 0/R PEL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NUM or SAMPS OVR PEL 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 image: ------- Ml All It HA^AKU INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTV EMPLOYMENT US OSIIA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 SUBST . 360 490 630 686 690 720 730 731 1033 1080 1280 1430 1520 1522 1560 1590 1591 1620 1840 2180 2260 2270 2460 2590 2612 9010 9020 9135 SUBST 1038 2590 SUBST 1631 NUM OF INSPS 52 1 1 1 1 3 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 2 5 2 3 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 5 2 NUH OF INSPS 2 1 1 NUH OF INSPS 2 2 EXPOSURE NUH OF TEST SAHPS 97 1 1 4 1 4 4 4 5 2 2 2 1 11 1 2 2 10 3 5 2 2 1 4 6 2 1 10 4 NUH OF TEST SAHPS 3 2 1 NUH OF TEST SAHPS 2 2 SUMMARY: SUBSTANCES HEAN MAX PROPTN OF PEL 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.07 0.37 0.32 1.46 0.00 0.12 0. 19 0.00 0.51 0.57 0.02 2.13 1.22 0.02 0.08 0.04 0.02 0.03 2.59 0.37 0.40 0.00 0.31 1.61 NUMMARY • 111 ounnMn » • ovi MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.23 0.46 0.00 C 1 IMM A R V • ^11 ounn/\n T . DU MEAN PROPTN or PEL 0.68 0.68 PROPTN OF PEL 6.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.18 0.55 0.72 3. 19 0.00 0. 12 0.36 0.00 3.55 0.57 0.04 3.98 3.88 0.06 0.38 0.06 0.03 0.03 6.05 0. 70 0.70 0.00 1.50 3.67 OCT AUpCC DO i mil* c o MAX PROPTN OF PEL 0.85 0.85 0.00 nc T ANfT c Do 1 Mr^VrfC O MAX PROPTN or PEL 0.83 0.83 USED IN SIC=7699 NUM INSP NUM OF W SOME SMP>PEL 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 ti^rn IM <* i P— HI UOE.U in o i *_> — o* NUM INSP W SOHE SHP>PEL 0 0 INSP W HEAN>PEL 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 NUH OF INSP W MEAN>PEL 0 0 0 0 NUH INSP NUH OF W SOHE SHP>PEL 0 0 INSP W MIAN>PEL 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 3 NUM OF SAHPS OVR PEL 0 0 0 NUH OF SAMPS OVR PEL 0 0 image: ------- HEALTH HAZARD EXPOSURES INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH SCLARA CNTY EMPLOYMENT US OSHA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1982 SUBST 20 (40 290 330 395 (435 670 1030 1038 1060 1080 1190 1210 1280 1290 1(430 1(480 1590 1630 1860 1953 2085 > 2120 ' 2M60 m 2"75 00 2590 9020 SUBST 320 UMO 570 670 87(4 1011 1060 1160 1210 1290 1515 1860 1870 NUM OF INSPS 5(4 1 1 1 1 (4 1 2 1 3 <4 1 5 1 1 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 3 NUM OF INSPS 2(4 1 1 1 txrubunt NUM OF TEST SAMPS 128 3 1 1 1 1(4 1 (4 1 17 12 2 9 3 1 17 1 1 1 2 1 (4 1 3 (4 1 16 6 NUM OF TEST SAMPS 29 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 6 1 1 2 &UMMAKY: MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.91 0.20 0.60 0.0(4 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.39 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5. (45 0.00 0.00 0.0(4 0.00 0. 16 0.00 Q 1 IUU A ft V • ourwiAn T ; MEAN PROPTN OF PEL 0. 32 0.00 0.02 0.0(4 0.71 0. 1(4 0.(45 0.00 0.03 0.02 0.32 (4.30 0.00 0.00 bUttblANUt:> U MAX PROPTN OF PEL 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.30 0.00 1.98 0.20 (4.00 0.09 0.05 0.03 0.05 0.39 5.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 1.(45 0.00 QIIQC T AUtTTC II OUDO 1 AntsC.0 U MAX HROPIN OF PEL (4.30 0.00 0.02 0.0(4 1.(42 0. 1(4 0.(45 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.90 (4.30 0.00 0.00 btU IN SIL,= O( NUM INSP W SOME SMP>PEL 8 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 JOZ NUM OF INSP W MEAN>PEL 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cm i u cip an~7 i _._.__. NUM INSP NUM OF W SOME SMP>PEL 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 INSP W MEAN>PEL 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 19 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 (4 0 0 0 0 1 0 NUH OF SAMPS OVR PEL 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 image: ------- INOUSTMirs WITH HIGH SCLARA CNIV EMPLOYMENT US OSMA INSPECTIONS 1979 THRU 1983 I \O 10 a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. 1. j. EXPOSURE SUMMARY: SUBSTANCES USED IN SIC=8O71 SUBST HUH Of HUH OT MEAN MAX HUM INSP HUM Of INSPS TEST PROPTN PROPTN W SOME INSP W SAMPS OF PEL OF PEL SMP>PEL MEAN>PEL 1875 1 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 2053 1 1 0.21 0.21 0 0 2590 2 3 0.07 0.10 0 0 2630 1 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 9010 1 1 0.014 O.Oll 0 0 SUBST NUH Of NUN OF MEAN MAX HUM INSP HUM OF INSPS TEST PROP1N PROPTN W SOME INSP W SAMPS OF PEL OF PEL SMP>PEL MEAN>PEL 8 11 0.22 2.55 1 1 360 1 1 0.04 O.Oll 0 0 690 1 2 0.00 0.00 0 0 1720 1 2 0.00 0.00 0 0 I77H 2 2 0.01 0.03 0 0 9010 2 3 0.8U 2.55 1 1 9020 1 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 SUBST NUH OF NUH OF MEAN MAX NUH INSP NUH OF INSPS TEST PROPTN PROPTN W SOME INSP W SAMPS OF PEL OF PEL SMP>PEL MEAN>PEL 3 13 0.00 0.00 0 0 9020 3 13 0.00 0.00 0 0 Standard Industrial Classification: see Appendix 11 for industry names. Industrial Hygiene Field Operation Manual (IHFOM) substance codes: see Appendix 6 Number of Inspections performed. Number of test (exposure) samples taken. Mean exposure expressed as a proportion of the federal OSHA PEL. Maximum exposure expressed as a proportion of the federal OSHA PEL. Number of Inspections with at least one sample above the federal OSHA PEL. Number of Inspections with mean exposure above the federal OSHA PEL, Number of exposure samples above the federal OSHA PEL. "." indicates summary values for each SIC. HUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 0 0 0 0 0 NUN OF SAMPS OVR PEL 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 NUM OF SAMPS OVR PEL 0 0 for key to substance names. image: ------- API'ENDI ». b A Key to Industrial Hygiene Field Operations Manual (IHFOM) Hazardous Substance Code Numbers NOHS • •10 • 020 • 030 0040 • 060 • 070 0080 • OBI 0110 0115 • 120 0120 • 125 • 130 0145 • 150 0160 1160 1162 • 165 0170 • 175 > 8185 *""* U 1 o 0220 0225 0230 0230 0230 • 230 • 230 0230 0230 0230 4230 0230 0230 0230 0230 0230 0230 0230 0230 0230 02J5 0260 0260 0?60 0 "63 0260 026J • 1038 • 1568 • 2740 • 2820 02900 03298 17480 71401 • 3530 03540 • 3800 80266 04260 04370 04530 • 4590 05608 23265 • 4975 05215 05250 • 6270 06190 06320 06580 • 7040 A1433 A1640 A1641 M1109 M2375 M2725 M3285 M3911 M3981 M4098 M4109 • 7310 07325 07328 07370 07405 80255 82890 M0294 M0617 MI4B6 0 7 5 image: ------- 17'/B3 PAGE IHFOM NOUS 0260 0260 0260 0260 0260 0270 0290 0290 0290 0300 0310 0310 0310 0310 0310 0310 0310 0310 0310 0310 0310 0310 > 0310 I 0310 Ł0310 20310 0310 0310 0310 0318 0320 0330 0335 0340 0360 0360 0360 OJ60 0370 0374 0374 0374 0380 0330 0381 0382 0390 0391 O'.OO 0410 04 10 C4iO 84436 84465 84479 84586 84735 07580 80636 84737 90320 35750 M0787 M2929 M3299 08640 08650 08655 80341 81719 81720 83238 83391 83715 83717 83799 83S91 84175 84310 84519 84801 84438 09070 09830 11280 11600 A1144 11770 11855 83348 81729 M0079 12940 80517 12963 12964 12966 12980 13100 13103 1 3160 1 1410 t, JVG? 1 19«0 SUBSTANCE HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 10 7 3 10 10 7 7 10 10 10 10 1 7 7 7 1 1 7 3 7 7 7 1 I I SUBSTANCE ARSENIC PENTOXIDE SODIUM ARSEN1TE ARSENIC ACID ARSANILIC ACID Dir.ETHYLARSINIC ACID ARSINE ASPHALT WOLATILES BITUI1EN ASPHALT AZINPIIOS. METHYL BARIUM METABORATE BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE BARIUM FLUORIDE BARIUM CARBONATE BARIUM CHLORIDE BARIUM HYDROXIDE BARIUM OXIDE BARIUM DIPHENYLAMINE SULFONATE BARIUM NITRATE BARIUM PEROXIDE BARIUM HYDROXIDE. OCTAHYDRATE BARIUM ALUMINATE BARIUM ALUMINATE BARIUM PHOSPHATE BARIUM BORATE BARIUM CHLORATE BARIUM SUIFIDE BARIUM ACE1ATE BARIUM PERCHLORATE BAYGON (PROPOXUR) BENZENE BCNZIDINE BENZOYL PEROXIDE BENZYL CHLORIDE BERYLLIUM CHLORIDE BERYLLIUM BERYLLIUM OXIDES SODIUM BERYLLIUM BENZENESULFONATE BISrUTH TELLURIDE SODIUM BORATES BORAX SODIUM BORATE BORON OXIDE BORON OXIDES BOROH TRIBPOMIDE BOrON TR I FLUORIDE BR'lillME PENUFLUORIDC BROtlOHOPM mil AOILMC . 1.3- nr FIIYL ACI ioMr fHHYL IIIIYL image: ------- PACE IHFOn NOHS 5U8SIAMCC HAZARD UCIGHT 0435 0435 0440 0441 0460 0461 0462 0470 0477 0478 0480 0485 0490 0490 0490 0490 0490 0490 0490 0490 0490 0490 0490 p 0490 1 0490 |± 0490 S 0*9.0 0490 0490 0490 0490 0490 0490 0490 0490 0490 0500 0505 0505 0505 0505 0510 0515 0520 0522 Or>24 0524 OS>?5 0',?7 OV'7 U52R M17S7 29930 143*0 14382 13450 14410 14400 14440 14720 M112B 11785 14910 A1077 A1661 M1507 M1508 M1554 M2267 M2269 M2270 M2900 M4151 15570 15410 80247 81747 81748 81749 81750 82781 83005 83628 81718 84157 84457 84478 15700 A1571 15705 17855 80165 15710 15741 15755 15800 MI989 81M2 478PO Alt?? R0? image: ------- 17/83 PAGE IHFOM HOHS 0529 0529 0530 0540 0560 0570 0571 0575 0577 0590 0611 0612 0614 0615 0617 0620 0623 0627 0628 062ft 0630 0630 0630 > 0640 ^0645 00660 u>0670 0675 0680 0683 0686 0686 0686 0686 0686 0686 0686 0686 0686 0686 0686 0686 0686 0686 0686 0686 0686 0686 0616 0636 06fib OfeRfc 73860 84027 17367 17370 17460 17490 M1763 17683 17695 46240 51591 73500 18045 18050 18065 18190 18240 18250 M0418 80048 M0335 80241 90510 18040 29010 18590 18500 M0419 18260 M4039 A1227 M0063 M0073 M0074 M0789 M0814 M0886 M0900 M092t M1488 M1499 M1686 M2265 M2498 M2697 060&I 19360 19395 19410 60170 68900 80064 5UBSTAHCE HAZARD WEIGHT 7 7 1 10 7 10 10 1 7 7 10 7 7 1 7 3 1 3 1 1 10 10 10 7 10 1 10 7 10 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 SUBSTANCE CAPTAN TRICHLOROMETHYLTHIO-4-CYCLOHEXENE-1.2- CARDON DIOXIDE CARBON DISULFIDE CARBON MONOXIDE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE CATECHOL CELLULOSE PORTLAND CEMENT METHOXYETHANOL.2 CHLORDANE TOXAPHENE CHLORINE DIOXIDE CHLORINE TRIFLUORIDE CHLOROACETALDEHYDE CHLOROBENZENE CHLOROBENZYLIDENE MALONITRILE CHLOROBROMOflETHAHE CHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE MONOCHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE CHLORINATED DIPIIENYL ETHER POLYCHLORINATED DIPHENYL CHLORODIPHEHYLS CHLORINE EPICHLORHYDRIN CHLORO-1-NITROPROPANE CHLOROFORM CHLOPOPICRIN CHLOROPRENE CHLOROTOLUENE ORGANIC CHROMIUM COMPOUNDS INORGANIC CHROI1ATES SODIUM DICHROMATE (VI) INORGANIC DICHROMATES MAGNESIUM DICHROMATE LEAD CHROMATE LEAD MOLYBDATE,LEAD SULF LEAD CHROMATE MOLYBOATED ZINC TETROXY CHROMATE C.I. 77600-PIGttENT YELLOW 34 CHROME ORANGE CHROME GREEN LEAD CHROMATE.LEAD SULFATE - FERRIC AM BARIUM CHROMATE CALCIUM DICHROMATE LEAD CHROMATE LEAD SULFATE COMPLEX AMI1UNIUM DICHROMATE (VI) CHROMIC ACID CHROMIUM CHROMIUM TRIOXIDE POTASSIUM CHROMATE SODIUM CHROMAIE POTASSIUM DICHROMATE image: ------- PAGE IHFOn HOHS 0686 0666 0686 0686 0686 0686 0686 0686 0690 0690 0690 0690 0690 0690 0690 0690 0690 0695 0700 0710 0720 0720 0720 > 0720 1 0720 >- 0720 S 0720 0720 0730 0730 0730 0730 0730 0730 0730 0730 0730 0730 0730 0735 0760 0760 0760 0760 0765 0780 0732 'J790 0790 0790 07 )0 0790 8170) 81 774 81876 83496 84660 90560 90570 90580 A1040 A 1041 19380 82232 82893 83431 83500 84289 84456 19767 90620 M0628 M1023 M2576 19770 80347 81777 82231 84329 84330 M1149 M2276 M32BO 20115 20155 20170 20200 80237 82803 83641 84334 94040 20380 84266 84364 84497 T0624 ?onso 209\0 AI047 AI491 M00b2 IT'flfi ") 60400 SUBSTANCE MAZAKD WEIGHT 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 7 1 1 7 7 7 7 7 SUBSTANCE AMMONIUM CHROMATE CHROME YELLOU LEAD CHROMA IE CALCIUM CHROI1ATE STRONTIUM CHROMATE CHROME PLATING COMPOUND CHROMOUS SALTS INORGANIC CHROMIUM COMPOUNDS CHROMIC FLUORIDE CHROMOUS SULFATE CHROMIC NITRATE CHROMIC POTSM. SULFATE CHROMIC POTSM.SULFATE.DODECAHYDRATE CHROMOUS CHLORIDE CHROMOUS SULFITE CHROMIC ACETATE CHROMIC CHLORIDE COAL COAL TAR PITCH VOLATILES NAPTHA COBALTOUS SULFATE COBALT OXIDE COBALT COBALT NAPHTHENATE COBALTOUS ACETATE COBALT NAPHTHENATE COBALTOUS CHLORIDE COBALTOUS NITRATE CUPRIC CHLORIDE C. I. 77400-PIGMENT METAL 2 COPPER POUDGR COPPCR COPPER CYANIDE COPPER OXIDES COPPER SULFATE COPPER NAPHTHENATE CUPROUS CYANIDE COPPER HYDROXIDE COPPER CHLORIDE COTTOH DUST CRESOL CRESOL PARA CRESOL OHIHO CRESOL IIETA CRISTOBALUE CliriEIIE CYAHAMIDE SODIUM COPPER CYANIDE CYANIDE SOL INORGANIC CYAMIDCS CAlCIUM CYANIDE POTAOSIUM CYANIDE image: ------- '/17/83 PAGE IHFOM NOHS 0790 0790 0790 0790 0790 0790 0800 0810 0820 0830 0840 0842 0845 0646 0847 OC50 0850 0857 OF.60 0860 0361 0862 > 0863 1 0864 j± 0367 g 0868 0869 0870 0871 0872 0874 0080 0880 0887 0900 0902 0903 0905 0910 0920 0921 0921 0922 0923 0924 0925 092*. 0927 O1)?!! 0929 0979 00 JO 68950 80720 81838 81950 82888 83663 20970 21190 21560 21660 21705 84526 20065 24270 73750 M0377 M3026 M0376 M4016 23010 23370 23650 23865 23880 24003 24006 24025 03350 24095 24100 24130 24150 84164 24235 24425 M2501 83439 K2830 24680 24930 M0687 25210 25515 12846 25820 25650 27615 2609b 261 to 7 it 17") H J77«i ;• o •> f> o SUBSTANCE HAZARD WEIGHT 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 1 3 3 1 3 1 3 10 3 3 3 3 3 10 7 1 3 10 10 10 1 1 1 10 7 7 1 1 7 3 10 1 1 7 7 3 3 3 1 3 3 1 1 0 i n i SUBSTANCE SODIUM CYANIDE ZINC CYANIDE GOLD CYANIDE GOLD POTASSIUM CYANIDE AMMONIUM CYANIDE COBALT CYANIDE CYANOGEN CYCLOHEXANE CYCLOHEX/.NOL CYCLOHEXANONE CYCLOHEXENE CYCLONEXYLAMINE-SKIN CYCLOPENTADIENE D1CNLOP.OPHEHOXYACETIC ACID DICHLORODIPHENYLTRICHLOROETHANE DIMETHYL 0-( 2 . 2-DICHLOROVINYL )PNOSPHAT DIMETHYL DICHLOROVINYL PHOSPHATE DEMETON HYDROXY-4-METHYL-2-ENTANONE. 4-P DIACETONE ALCOHOL DIAZOMETHANE DIBORAHE DIBUTYL PHOSPHATE DIBUTYL PHTHALA1E DICHL090DENZEHE. ORTHO- DICHLOROBENZENE, PARA- DICHLGROBENZIDFNE,3,3 DICHLOROETHYLENE DICHLORODIFIUOROMETHANE DICHLORA-5.5-DIMETHYIHYDANTOIN DICHLOROETHANE (ETHYLCNE DICIILORIDE) DICHLOROETHYL ETHER BISC2-CHLOROETHYL ) ETHER DICHLOROFLUOR0.1E THANE DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE DICROTOPHOS (BIDRIN)-SKIN DICYCLOPENTADIENE DIEIDRIN DIETHYLAMINE DIE1HYLAMINOETHANOL DIAMINOUIETHYLAMINE. DIETNYLENE TRIAKIIIE DiriUOROniBROMOMETHANE DIGLYCIDYL ETHER D 1 METHYL -4 -HEP TANONF. 2.6 01 ISOPROPYLAMINE-SKIM DIPHtMYL AI11IIE DIMETHYL ACETAMIDC PIMEIHYl AMINE DIME niYLAMir'u A70Brn^pNF ninr rim AiniuiA/oni ti/i tir DII1I IIIYI I (i: image: ------- PAGE IHFOH NOUS ( ( 1 1 ( 1 1 1 > t-> a\ 0930 1931 1932 1932 1933 1935 1940 )950 I960 1970 1970 1971 1970 1990 1010 1011 1013 1014 1016 1018 1030 1)33 1037 1037 1037 1040 1050 1060 1060 1070 1073 1075 1080 1090 100 110 130 140 155 160 161 170 175 190 190 210 220 22* 2JO L't3 l?67 u;o 26560 26335 A1591 26420 81806 M2705 •84395 59210 26880 27046 27048 27050 83370 27125 25145 27590 M1527 84537 83646 MO 34 7 04980 31350 04580 46930 84580 31470 31490 H0238 31500 31520 27780 83448 31830 31900 36330 31970 32220 23660 32610 24120 MJB89 46935 M0492 A1719 32550 32590 32760 32840 3^940 M0362 11J35 J1J70 SUBSTANCE HAZARD WEIGHT 3 1 3 3 3 10 10 3 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 1 1 1 10 3 1 1 3 3 10 10 10 I 7 1 1 7 1 7 SUBSTANCE DIMETHYLFORMAMIDE DII1ETHYLANILINE DIBROMO-2.2-DICHLOROETHYL DIMETHYL PHO DIMETHYL-1.2-DIBROI10-2.2-DICHLOROETHYL DIETHYL PHTHALATE DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPAHE.1.2 DIMETHYLHYDRAZIIIE-SKIN DIMETHUPHTHALATE DIMETHYL SULFATE-SKIH DINITROBENZENE. META- DINITR08ENZEHE, ORTHO DINITROBEHZENE, PARA DIHITROBENZEHE (ALL ISOMERS) DIHITROIOIUEHE 1.4-DIOXANE DIPHENYL CORUHDUtl DIPROPYLENE CLYCOL MOHOMETHYL ETHER METHYL OLEATE ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE,BIS<2- ETHANOLAMINE ETHOXYETHAHOL.2 THOXYETHOXY)ETHANOL ACETATE, 2-<2- ETHYLENE GLYCOL MOHOETHYL ETHER ACETAT ETHOXYETHYL ACETATE ETHYL ACETATE ETHYL ACRYLATE ALCOHOL ETHAHOL ETHYLAMINE METHYLENE BISPHEHYL ISOCYAHATE ETHYL 5EC-AI1YL KETOHE ETHYL BENZENE BROMOETIIANE ETHYL BUTYL KETONE ETHYL CHLORIDE ETHYLEHEDIAMINE 1.2DIBROMOETHANE E1HYL FORMATE 1,1 DICHLOROETHANE ETHYLIDENE NORBORENE ETHYLEHE GLYCOL MOHOMETHYL ETHER ACETA AZIRIDIHE ETHYLENE OXIDE CONDENSATE ETHYLEHE OXIDE ETHYL ETHER EIHYL MERCAPTAN CTHYIMORPHOLINE ETHYL SILICATE HRRIC DIMITHYLDITHIOCARBAMATE FtRROVAIIADIUM DUST FlUORIMC image: ------- PAGE IHFOM NOHS 1280 1280 1280 1280 1280 1280 1210 1280 1230 1280 1280 12CO 1280 1280 1280 1285 1290 1290 1292 1300 1310 1325 > 1330 I 1340 Ł 1340 2 1540 1340 1365 1367 1368 1369 1371 1372 1374 1370 1380 1385 1387 1339 1389 1390 1390 1390 1415 1420 1430 1440 I'.fcO I'i70 1480 1490 1 r>00 M0187 M0579 M0699 MI010 12985 33595 60410 80297 81734 81932 81945 84180 84314 A4425 84445 33565 M1529 33640 84454 33245 33720 34120 34370 M0541 90880 90833 90885 35120 90950 35755 35960 36060 17385 T0175 83899 36955 37510 37520 37630 82206 M0499 33110 84394 M'^385 38575 3B580 3B530 38550 JBC.05 laozo 1 1, f> '• •> i-)(\?0 SUBSTANCE HAZAKD WLK.HT 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 1 10 10 3 7 7 1 1 10 10 10 10 1 1 1 10 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 10 10 10 3 7 7 7 10 1 7 1 0 SUBSTANCE HEXAFIUORIDES CALCIUM FlUORIDE ALUtllHUn FLUORIDE LITHIUM FLUORIDE BORON TRIFLUCRIUE COMPLEXES FLUORSPAR POTASSIUM FLUORIDE MAGNESIUM FLUORIDE RROI1INE TRIFLUORIDE fHOSPIIORUS PENTAFLUORIDE POTASSIUM BIFLUORIDE AMMONIUM SILICOFLUORIDE At-MIONIUM FLUORIDE SODIUM FLUORIDE SILICON TETRAFLUORIDE FLilOROTRICHLOROME THANE FORMALIN FORMALDEHYDE FORMAMIDE Gl ASS, FIBROUS OR DUST FORMIC ACID FURFURAL FURFURYL ALCOHOL GASOLINES GASOLINE-LEADED GASOLINE-LEAD CONTENT UNKNOWN GASOLINE UNLEADED GLYCIDOL GYPSUM HAFNIUM IIFPTACHLOR HEPTANE HEXACIILOROETHANE HFXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE HEXAFLUOROACETONE HEXANE HEXONE HFXYL ACETATE HFXYLENE GLYCOL HIXANEDIOL DIAMIDCS HYDPAZINE DUMINES HYOROGENATED TERPHENYLS HYDROGEN BROMIDE CHLORIDE CYANIDE FLUORIDE PER(IXini: IIHCIJ«)r.rH '>Ul 1 1 1)1 HYIK noimiiiiH I 111)1 HI HYDROGFM HYDHCGCN HYD30G1H image: ------- PAGE IHFOn NOHS > 1 H" O CO 15*3 1510 1510 1510 1510 1510 1515 1517 1520 1520 1520 1520 1520 1521 1522 1522 1522 1522 1522 1522 1522 1522 1522 1522 1522 1522 1522 1522 1522 1522 1522 1522 1522 1522 1522 1522 1522 1522 1522 1522 152? 1522 15)0 1512 1534 1536 538 539 •>'.0 560 562 565 43115 A1758 A1759 AI760 39860 52162 40030 04474 MO 130 M0131 40297 70131 80990 A136S A1319 M0100 110783 33160 33165 33230 B0285 80413 B0414 B041S 80945 80950 80965 81830 81831 81832 82179 82194 82829 83242 83265 83295 83450 84095 84149 84198 84692 84828 40370 40380 40410 40430 40910 B3571 4Q984 40987 40910 25905 SUBSTANCE HAZARD UEIGHT 7 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 I 7 7 7 7 10 1 1 SUBSTANCE LtTHIUn HYDRIDE INDIUM OXIDE INO INDIUM OXIDE IM20 INDIUM OXIDE IN203 INDIUM INDIUM OXIDES IODINE IODOFORM FERROUS OXIDE FERROSOFERRIC OXIDE IRON OXIDES IRON OXIDE BLACK IRON OXIDE YELLOW IRON PENTACARBONYL IRON CHLORITE IRON SULFATES FERRIC AMMONIUM FERROCYANIOE FERRIC CHLORIDE FERRIC SULFATE FERROUS SULFATE AMMONIUM FERROUS SULFATE FERRIC AMMONIUM CITRATE FERROUS FUilARATE FERROUS GLUCANATE FERRIC NITRATE FERRIC SUBSULFATE SOL FERROUS CARBONATE FERRIC AMMONIUM SULFATE FERRIC CITRATE FERROUS AMMONIUM CITRATE FERROUS CHLORIDE FERRIC HYDRIDE FERRIC ACETYL ACETONATE FERRIC AMMONIUM NITRATE IRON DISULFICE IRON DITHICCARRAMATE FERRIC CACODYLATE FERRIC POTASSIUM SULFATE AMMONIUM FERRIC TARTRATE FERRIC SULFITE FERROUS LACTATE FERRIC AMMONIUM OXALATE ISOAMYL ACETATE ISOAMYL ALCOHOL ISOBUTYL ACETATE I-SOPUTYL ALCOHOL 1SOPHORONE ISCPHORONE DIISOCYANATE ISOP^OPYL ACEtATE ISOPRUPYL AlCOMOL IGOPHOPYLAMINE ISOPRCPYL ETHER image: ------- PAGE 10 IHFOM NOHS > 1 K-1 o VO 1567 1568 1574 1590 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1511 1591 159J 1595 41150 41775 41840 42510 A1297 A1505 A1768 M0124 M0125 M0126 M0751 M1015 M1387 M1685 M1690 M1691 M1693 Ml 945 M2566 M2935 M3171 113199 M3200 M39AO 42490 42665 80252 80832 81000 81677 81377 82952 83015 83045 83062 83080 83081 83299 83436 83453 83915 84278 84433 84439 84473 84544 84545 84 Vi 6 « image: ------- PAGE 11 IHFOM NOHS 1610 1615 1616 1618 1620 1620 1620 1620 1620 1620 1620 1620 1620 16?0 1620 1620 1620 1620 1620 1620 1620 1420 > U20 I 1620 M 1620 *- 1620 0 1620 1620 1620 1620 1620 1620 1620 1622 1626 1630 1630 1630 1631 1631 1631 1631 1631 1631 1631 1631 1631 1631 1631 16)1 16)1 U 11 80298 80144 80046 43660 M0065 M0921 Ml 134 M1633 M1634 M1784 M2578 M4544 44000 44025 44030 44035 60490 80300 80453 80454 80455 80456 81664 81680 81885 81886 82208 82900 83118 83498 84068 84353 84621 M0804 M0341 A1720 M0475 83751 A1787 M1643 M1767 M2383 M2765 M2769 M4389 44870 44)15 45315 80143 80 10] 8 ICOS BIO 10 SUBSTANCF HAZARD WEIGHT 1 1 1 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 3 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUBSTANCE MAGNESIUM OXIDE MAGNESIUM CARBONATE MAIATHION MAIEIC ANHYDRIDE INORGANIC MANGANATE5 MANGANESE DRIER MM 2-AMINO-5-CHLORO-PARA-TOLUENESU MANGANESE TALLATE MANGANOUS OXIDE MANGANESE ABIETATE CALCIUM MANGANESE OCTOATE MN 2-HAPHTHOL-4.B-DISULFONATE MANGANESE INORGANIC MANGANESE COMPOUNDS MANGANESE DIOXIDE MANGANESE OXIDES POTASSIUM PERMANGANATE MANGANESE LINOLEATE MANGANESE CITRATE MANGANESE GIUCONATE MANGANESE Gl YCEROPHOSPHATE MANGANESE HYPOPHOSPHI TE MANGANESE OXIDE MANGANESE SULFATE MANGANESE NAPHTHENATE MANGVIOUS NITRATE MANGANESE CARBONATE MANGANESE HYDROXIDE POTASSIUM MAMGANAIE MANGANESE TITANATE MANGANESE PHOSPHATE MANGANESE CHLORIDE ACETATE MANGANESE TRICARBONYL MANGANESE CYCLOPENTADIENYL MARBLE ETHYL KERCURY CHLORIDE MERCURY CONTAIDC ORGANOMETALl 1C MERCURIC ACETATE MERCURY FULMINATE MERCURIC SULFIDE REV MERCURIC SULFIDE. BLACK MERCURIC SULFIDE McRCURIC CYANIDE MERCURIC OXIDE. RFD MtRCUROUS CHLORIDE MERCURY INORGANIC MERCURY MERCURY OXIDIS NIRCDRIC OXIDE (If XCURIC SUI FATE WRCUK1C MIISA1E CUKCUKOUS OXIDE COMPOU image: ------- /17/83 PAGE 12 IHFOM NOH5 1631 1631 1631 1631 1631 1631 1631 1631 1631 1635 1643 1644 1646 1650 1651 1652 1653 1655 1660 1665 1675 1680 1690 1710 — 1720 1730 1735 1735 1740 1750 1767 1768 1770 1772 1773 1774 1775 1776 1777 1778 1779 1781 1790 1790 1790 1790 1790 1710 1790 1790 1 790 1790 81888 82169 82901 82902 84220 84274 84623 84624 84776 45360 45850 B0027 46210 46410 46435 81894 46450 26075 45930 46470 36340 M0420 37330 M0421 46970 47270 M4755 80619 47030 80105 84547 26540 33850 M0422 47625 47700 47855 M0430 48330 M1533 48535 81971 A1279 M0066 M0097 M0616 110669 MOB70 M110Z M2 T?2 4R625 4S62B SUBSTANCE HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 1 7 3 I 1 1 1 3 3 7 1 1 10 1 7 7 1 1 1 1 10 1 3 1 7 7 7 3 1 7 1 7 7 3 3 3 3 J 3 3 1 3 J SUBS1ANCE MERCURIC IODIDE MERCURIC AMMONIUM CHLORIDE MERCURIC BROMIDE MERCURIC THIOCYANATE TIN MERCAPTIDES MERCURIC CHLORIDE MERCURIC IODATE MERCURIC OXYCYANIDE MERCUROUS NITRATE MESITYL OXIDE METHYL MERCAPTAN METHOMYL CLANMATE) METHOXYCHLOR f.ETHYL ACETATE METHYL ACETYLEHE METHYL ACETYLENE-PROPADIENE METHYL ACRYLATE METHYLAL METHYL ALCOHOL METHYLAMIHE METHYL H-AMYL KETONE METHYL BROMIDE HEXANONE.2- METHYL CHLORIDE -TRICHLOROETHANE METHYLENE CHLORIDE METHYL CYANOACRYLATE METHYL 2-CYANOACRYLATE METHYLCYCLOIIEXANE METHYL ETHYL KETONE PEROXIDE METHYLCYCLOPENTADIENYL MANGANESE TRICA METHYL DEMETON METHYL FORMATE METHYL IODIDE METHYL ISOCYANATE METHYL METHACRYLATE METHYL PARATHION METHYL ISOAMYL KETONE METHYL SILICATE METHYL STYRENE MICA MINERAL WOOl FIBER FERROMOLY5DEHUM IHORGANIC MOLYBDATES INORGANIC MOLYBDENUM COMPOUNDS MOLYBDENUM III OXIDE MOLYBDENUM 99 ?1HC MQLYBDAfE AMMONIUM D1MOLYBDATE Kill YBDf HUM DI HI IOI'IIOSPHATE 1101 YI»IM HUM MOLYnUI.HUH OXIDES image: ------- PAGE IIIFOH NOHS 1790 1790 1790 1790 1791 1791 1791 1791 1791 1797 1810 1815 1820 1830 1840 1840 1840 '1840 1840 1340 1840 1840 1840 1840 1840 1840 1840 1840 1840 1840 1840 1840 1840 1840 IS'. 1 1842 1342 1842 1842 1842 1542 1R42 1/155 I860 l nt 5 M;O 1 fi 1 2 1SSO |r.93 !''o; MI2 80056 81897 {.3456 84103 80790 81120 81661 81898 84549 48910 49600 84304 50065 9U90 M0101 MO 7 78 M1782 M1138 50440 50450 50460 50470 50480 50510 74033 81904 81906 81907 82957 83009 t J31 1 83650 84025 84725 50430 M1709 50420 50495 81905 82844 83744 84269 50570 50742 50748 50760 *0775 bO 7 95 50/45 •>03T5 50890 sunsMNct HAZARD 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 10 10 10 1 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 J 10 1 I 1 I 1 / J 7 SUBSTANCE MOLYBDENUM DISULFIOE MOLYBOATE ORANGE MOLYBDENUM PENTACMIORIDE OUINOLINE MOLYBDATE AMMONIUM MOLYBDATE (VI) SODIUM fiOLYBDATE (VI) MOIYBDOPHOSPHORIC ACID MOLYB01C ACID MOLYBDENUM 1RIOXIDE MORPHOLINE NAPHTHALEIIE HAPHIHYLAMINE NAPHTHYLA'IINE LIQUIFIED PETROLEUM GAS INORGANIC NICKEL COMPOUNDS NICKEL TITANATE NICKEL -ANTIMONY TITANATE TITANIUM. NICKEL. ANTIMONY COMPLEX NICKEL CHLORIDE NICKEL FLUORIDE FLUOBORATE NICKEL SULFAMATE NICKEL NIIRATE NICKEL SULFATE NICKEL FORMATE NICKEL SALTS NICKEL ACETATE NICKCL AMMONIUM SULFATE NICKEL OCTUATE NICKEL BROMIDE NICKEL DITHIOCARBAMATE NICKEL NAPHTIIEHAIE NICKEL 'iBUTYLDI.IETHYCARBAMATE ORGANIC NICKCL COMPOUNDS NICKEL CARBOHYL NICKEL PHOSPHATE NICKEL NICKEL OXIDES NICKFL CARBONATE NICKFL CYANIDE NICKEL SUIFIDE NICKEL OXIDE NICOTINE NIIRIC ACID HIIROANIlIHE NI IRODENZEIIE NIIROCIILORUBtNZENE.P IMTROETHAHE NI IRIC OXIDE NIIROGFM DIOXIDE MIIROCEN IRItLUORIDE HI IROGLYCEIf IN image: ------- /17/83 PAGE 1HFOM NOHS U) 1913 1920 1940 1941 1942 1145 1945 1953 1954 1957 1960 1970 1975 19AO 1982 1962 1964 1969 1990 2000 2000 2010 2017 2020 2030 2033 2035 2037 2037 2040 2041 2042 2047 2057 2060 2065 2070 2060 2085 2090 2090 2090 2091 2092 2093 2110 2120 2125 2125 21?7 2110 2130 32385 50910 51100 51090 51110 51115 41910 51118 M4718 51705 52370 52480 M0153 81651 53900 84723 53920 54160 54243 A1550 MOtOO 54480 83786 54790 54800 54810 111940 M0630 M2C29 55460 84116 56950 57210 57240 57300 M0373 57710 57740 58520 M0004 M0005 81650 59160 59162 59166 59230 59450 110291 60110 m:'57 AlilJl 84642 SUBSTANCE HAZARD UEIGHT 10 1 3 10 10 1 1 3 1 1 3 10 3 1 7 7 7 7 1 10 10 1 1 7 10 7 1 10 10 10 7 7 3 7 7 3 7 10 1 10 10 10 7 1 7 7 7 1 I 7 7 SUBSTANCE ETHYLENE GLYCOL NITR0.1ETHANE NITROPROPANE.l NITROPRGPANE.2 NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE NITROTOLUENE NITROTOLUENE.ORTHO NITROUS OXIDE NONANE OCTANE OSMIUM TETROXIDE OXAIIC ACID OXYGEN DIFLUORIDE OZONE PARAQUAT PARAQUAT DICIILORIDE PARATHION PENTACHLOROPNENOL PENTANE PARAFFIN WAX FUME PARAFFIN WAX 2-PENTANONE PICIORAM (TORDON) TETKACHIOROEIHYIEHE PERCHLOROMETHYL MERCAPTAN PERCHIORYL FLUORIDE PEHLITE NAPTHA-SOLVENT PETROLEUM NAPHTHA PHENOL PHENOTHIAZINE PIIENYLENE DIAMINE DIPHENYL OXIDE PHENYl GLYCIDYl ETHER PHENYLHYORAZINE METHYL3-(DIMETHOXYPHOSPHINYLOXY)CROTON PHOSGENE PHOSPIIINE PHOSPHORIC ACID PHOSPHORUS(UHITE) rilOSPHORUS PHOSPHOROUS PHOSPHOROUS PENTACHLORIDE PHOSPHOROUS PENTASULFIDE PHOSPHOROUS TRICHLORIDE PHIHALIC ANHYDRIDE PICRIC ACID PIWALYL-1.3-INDANDIONE PINDONE PLASirR PLAIItllin TRIOXIDFS PLATIIIUM CHLORIDE image: ------- PACE IS IHFOM NOHS 2135 2135 2140 2U3 2167 2170 2180 2190 2210 2213 2215 2216 2220 2221 2222 2223 2224 2225 2225 2226 2227 2227 2228 2229 2230 2230 2230 2230 2230 2230 2230 2230 2230 2230 2230 2230 2230 2232 2235 2236 2237 22 I rt HI IX I IE SIIVIP Dlt'Tim DITHinCARRArlAlE HOIASSlUfl SllUIR CYANIDL image: ------- 9/J/>«3 PAGE 16 IHFOM NOHS 2240 2243 2250 2260 2270 2275 2280 2290 2310 2320 2321 2322 2323 2324 2325 2327 2330 2334 2335 2339 2340 2350 > 2360 I 2370 •- 2390 Ł 2410 2420 2420 2422 2425 2427 2427 2430 2430 2430 2430 2430 2430 2430 2430 2430 2431 2431 2431 2431 2431 2431 2431 ?4 Jl 2411 2. image: ------- PAGE IMfOfl NOHS SUBSTANCE HAZARD WEIGHT 2432 2432 2449 2440 2440 2460 2470 2470 2470 2470 2470 2470 2470 2475 2475 2477 2480 2483 2485 2490 2495 2500 > 2505 I 2510 Ł 2530 Ł 2532 2532 2535 2537 2537 2537 2'>37 2j37 2537 2537 2537 2537 2537 2537 2537 2037 2540 2540 2560 2060 2560 2560 ?570 ?070 .'570 . •> 70 ."' ') 7 1 73253 82157 A1211 M0913 73258 73300 M0788 M1908 M1939 M2B74 M3831 M4270 73390 73470 83655 73730 74175 73870 84248 73790 73770 M0424 74405 73960 74550 74600 82880 74635 A1003 AI369 M0070 74980 Ł0230 81758 82032 82043 82854 83473 83488 83489 84213 M1322 74990 MI465 A2044 B20'.5 8?0'i6 AIOIO AMD 1 A 1 S n .-> Al SO \ M 1 7 ? 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 10 10 1 3 7 1 7 10 1 10 3 10 7 7 1 7 3 3 7 7 3 3 7 7 3 3 3 7 7 7 10 10 10 10 7 7 7 TOULEME TOLUENE TOLUEHE TOLUENE SUBSTANCE TIN OXIDE STAHHOUS OXIDE T ITANIUM. OXIDES OF CI PIGMENT 77891-PIGMENT UNITE 6 TITANIUM DIOXIDE TOLUENE TOLUENE-2.6-DIISOCYANATE TOLUENE DIISOCYANATE TERPOLYMER DIISOCYANAIE-POlYGlrCOl-HlDROX DIISOCYANATE POLYMER ADDUCT DIISOCYANATE DIISOCYANATE-MODIFIED SAFFLOUE TOLUENE-2.4-OIISOCYANATE TOLUIDINE.ORTHO TOLUIDINE TRIBUTYL PHOSPHATE TRIETHYLAMINE TRICHLORONAPHTHALENE TRICHLORO-1.2.2-TRIFLUOROETHANE.1.1.2- TRICHLOROETHYLEHE TRICHLOROETHANE TRIFLUOROBROMOMETHANE TRIMETHYLBEHZEHE TRICHLOROPROPANE TRIHITROTOIUENE TRIURTHOCRESYL PHOSPHATE TRI-CPESYL PHOSPHATE TR1PHEHYL PHOSPHATE TUNGSTEN OXIDES AnilOHIUM P-TUHGSTATE IHORGANIC TUNGSIATE TUNGSTEN TUNGSTEN CARBIDE CAICI'JM TUHGGIATE TUHGSIEN HEXAFLUORIDE TUNGSTIC ACID TUNGSTEN DISULFIDE SILICO TUNGSTIC ACID TUNGSTEN HEXACKLORI DE TUNGSTOPHOSPHATE TUUGST1C ANHYDRIDE TURPTNTINE (GUM) TURPENIIME INORGANIC URANIUM COMPOUNDS URANIUM ACETATE URANIUM ZIMC ACETATE (JtAHYL NITRATE VAHADIoM OXIDFS vAtiADiiin oxinr vo VANADIUM OX 11)1 V02 WAN \IJIIII1 OXIl:f V?0 \ VAHADIUIH W205l)USt , V205FUt1E) image: ------- 17/63 PAGE 18 IHFOM NOUS 2570 2570 2572 2577 2580 2531 2582 2583 2584 2584 2586 2587 2590 2590 2590 2590 2590 2592 2600 2602 2610 2610 > 2611 I 2611 Ł 2612 ^ 2612 2620 2620 2620 2620 2620 2620 2620 2620 2620 2620 2620 2620 2620 2620 2620 2650 2651 2681 2682 2683 2683 2683 2663 2720 2720 2740 76165 76210 76 ISOCYANATE DIQUAT DIBROM1DE DISULFURAI1 Dl(fERT-BUTYL)-PARA-CRE50L.2.6- DI-TERT-BUTYl-4-METHYLPHENOL.2.6- BUTYLATtD HYDROXYTOIUENES DHTERT-DUTYl ) -P AR A-CRESOL DIE1-0-C2- ISOPR-6-ME-4-PYRIMDIMYL) PH DlA7INON DIOXATHION image: ------- PAGE 19 IMF Ofl NOHS 2750 5010 50in 9010 9010 9010 9013 9010 9010 901 J 901) 9011 4020 9020 9U20 9010 90SO 9050 9050 90S5 9090 9210 9210 84542 52131 52138 M1806 21305 66495 67915 74617 90800 H1765 H1S07 M4JJ1 A1011 71525 90)10 71055 M1512 80542 84055 68768 17)66 Ml 127 $4220 SU35T4-.CE HAZARD UtlGHT 3 10 10 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 10 10 10 7 7 7 7 7 7 10 10 SUBSTANCE ETHION CUTTING OIL MIST LUTRICATIIIG OIL MIST SILICA FLOUR SILICA (QUARTZ) RESPIRABLE QUARTZ SAND TRIDYMITE FLINT PYROGENIC SILICA COLLOIDAL SILICA SILICA. FUSED ASCARITE TREr-OLITE ASBESTOS TALC SILICA GEL SILICA. FUMED DIATOMACEOUS EARTH-NATURAL SOAPSTONE GPAPH.ITE MOOD FIBER WOOD DUST. NON-ALLERGENIC 03959 RECORDS PRINTED a. Industrial Hygiene Field Operations Manual Code for Substances. b. NIOSH National Occupational Hazard Survey Code for Substances. c. Federal OSHA Hazard Weight: "1" and "3" indicate substances causing acute health effects indicate substances causing chronic effects. "10" is the most severe hazard weight. "7" and "10" image: ------- APPENDIX 7 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES IN SELECTED INDUSTRIES BY WEIGHTED INDEX Appendix 7 lists potentially hazardous substances evaluated in the National Occupa- tional Health Survey (NOHS) by industry, for industries listed in Table 4-11 (Section 4 of this report). OSHA assigned a weighted index to each of these substances, derived from an exposure factor, exposure index and hazard weight, and subsequently developed a composite weighted index for each industry (explained in Section 4). The composite weighted index is not included in these tables. The substance listings are by industry and give the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) .and description of the industry, plus total employment and number of firms surveyed in the given industry in NOHS. For each SIC, the top 80 substances are listed (unless fewer than 80 substances were evaluated for an industry) in descending order of weighted index. The substances are identified by the IHFOM (Industrial Hygiene Field Operation Manual) code, the NOHS code, and substance description. IHFOM codes are listed in Appendix 6. All manufacturing industries (SIC codes 2000 to 3999) are listed by 4-digit SIC. All non-manufacturing industries are listed only by 3-digit classification. For example, SIC 1750, "carpeting and flooring", contains data from 4-digit SIC's 1751, "carpeting", and 1752, "floor laying and floor work, not elsewhere classified". SIC codes are listed in Appendix 11. A-119 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 1540 NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION DESCRIPTION ---HOHS SURVEYED--- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 7,395 98 IHFOM CODE 9210 2037 0577 C9020 9050 2590 0290 2080 9030 2460 9090 1591 ^ 0686 7 2090 i- 9010 K> 1520 0 0560 1340 0490 1842 2360 2370 1290 0230 1591 1779 9010 0527 0230 0686 1631 0360 2420 0686 (T630 2537 C0260 1591 2229 5010 0374 NOHS CODE 94220 M2829 17695 90310 84055 76720 90320 57740 71055 73300 17366 42490 80064 81650 67915 40297 17460 90880 15630 50495 71640 71860 33640 07310 42685 48535 M1806 80243 A1433 19395 45315 11855 72085 81876 90510 A1003 07555 84546 M1463 52138 80517 MOODS PETROLEUM SPIRITS CEMEHT-PORTLAND ASBESTOS SILICA. AMORPHOUS FUSED XYLENE ASPHALT PHOSPHINE TALC TOLUENE GRAPHITE LEAD FOTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI) PHOSPHORUS SAND IRON OXIDES CARBON MONOXIDE GASOLINE-LEADED CADMIUM OXIDES NICKEL OXIDES TETRAETHYL LEAD TETRAMETHYL LEAD FORMALDEHYDE ANTIMONY LEAD OXIDES MICA SILICA FLOUR CARBON ANTIMONY SULFIDE CHROMIUM MERCURY OXIDES BERYLLIUM OXIDES THALLIUM OXIDES CHROMIC ACID. LEAD(2O SALT (1:1) CHLORODIPHENYLS TUNGSTEN OXIDES ARSENIC OXIDES LEAD SULFATE IRON OXIDE. RED OIL. LUBE SODIUM BORATE EXPOSURE FACTOR 3.122 1,389 1,691 1.120 1.380 1.308 839 645 860 818 807 553 489 487 660 649 645 437 371 371 529 529 337 325 316 446 428 299 294 292 277 274 274 266 259 369 257 257 352 225 314 EXPOSURE INDEX .422 .187 .228 .151 .186 .176 .113 .087 .116 .110 .109 .074 .066 .065 .089 .087 .087 .059 .050 .050 .071 .071 .045 .043 .042 .060 .057 .040 .039 .039 .037 .037 .037 .035 .035 .049 .034 .034 .047 .030 .042 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 07 10 07 07 10 10 07 07 07 10 10 10 07 07 07 10 10 10 07 07 10 10 10 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 10 10 07 10 07 WEIGHTE INDEX 4.221 .878 .600 .514 .306 .238 .134 .872 .814 .774 .763 .747 .661 .658 .624 .614 .610 .590 .501 .501 .500 .500 .455 .439 .427 .422 .405 .404 .397 .394 .374 .370 .370 .359 .350 .349 .347 .347 . 333 .304 .297 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OK STATISTICAL STUDIES AMD ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOUS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 1540 NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION DESCRIPTION NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 7.395 98 IHFOM CODE 2000 2620 2490 2570 1620 2611 1430 1018 0933 1591 1631 0990 2530 •> 25J2 , 0020 M 1340 NJ 2682 M C2650 2040 1536 1720 1912 2120 0686 1913 1591 2427 0921 0570 1591 0522 0160 2505 1591 1591 2540 1790 0430 0926 NOHS CODE M0600 M0626 73790 A1010 44035 77150 38580 M0347 81806 A1768 A1787 27125 74550 82880 01568 90883 80219 83341 55460 40430 46970 50890 59450 M0063 32585 91160 71900 25210 17493 83453 15800 20265 74405 M0126 M1693 74990 48628 13980 27615 PARAFFIN ZIRCONIUM OXIDE ETHYLEME. TRICHLORO- VANAOIUM OXIDES MANGANESE OXIDES ZINC CHLORIDE HYDROGEN CHLORIDE ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE. »IS(2- DIETHYL PHTHALATE LEAD AZIDE MERCURY FULMINATE DIHITROTOLUENE, 2.4- TRINITROTOLUENE PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER ACETIC ACID GASOLIHE, LEAD CONTENT UNKNOWN TETRAETHYLTHIURAM DISULFIDE HOCA PHENOL ISOEUTYL ALCOHOL TRICHLOROETHANE, 1,1.1- N1TROGLYCERIN PICRIC ACID INORGANIC CHROMATES ETHYLEME GLYCOL INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS TETRAI1ETHYLTHIURAM DISULFIDE DIETHYLENETRIAMINE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE LEAD NAPHTHENATE CAMPHOR ALUMINUM OXIDE TRIMETHVLBENZENE LEAD TETROXIDE LEAD SOAP TURPENTINE MOLYBDENUM OXIDES BUTANONE, 2- DIPHtNYLAMINE EXPOSURE FACTOR 214 296 275 274 274 183 257 178 592 175 175 175 175 239 237 166 158 158 157 154 213 175 175 120 118 115 161 160 109 107 141 320 94 93 91 123 274 819 261 EXPOSURE INDEX .028 .040 .037 .037 .037 .024 .034 .024 .080 .023 .023 .023 .023 .032 .032 .022 .021 .021 .021 .020 .028 .023 .023 .016 .015 .015 .021 .021 .014 .014 .019 .043 .012 .012 .012 .016 .037 .110 .035 HAZARD HEIGHT 10 07 07 07 07 10 07 10 03 10 10 10 10 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 07 07 07 10 10 10 07 07 10 10 07 03 10 10 10 07 03 01 03 .289 .280 .260 .259 .259 .247 .243 .240 .240 .236 .236 .236 .236 .226 .224 .224 .213 .213 .212 .208 .201 .165 .165 .162 .159 .155 .152 .151 .147 . 144 .133 .129 .127 .125 .123 . 116 .111 .110 . 105 282 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 1540 OTHER TOTALS-' 51.418 6.814 42.632 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 1610 HIGHWAY AND STREET CONSTRUCTION DESCRIPTION NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 3.799 54 > 1 1— 1 K) K> IHFOM CODE 0290 2037 2590 0577 9210 2460 2360 2370 1340 9090 5010 9030 C9020 9050 0686 2090 9010 9010 1779 0490 1842 2532 2505 1340 0290 0686 2611 1520 1591 0360 1591 •1631 2420 1591 2490 2537 0374 2080 2570 1620 1913 NOHS CODE 90320 M2829 76720 17695 94220 73300 71640 71860 90880 17366 52138 71055 90310 84055 80064 81650 67915 M1806 48535 15630 50495 82880 74405 90883 80636 M0063 77150 40297 83453 11855 42685 45315 72085 91160 73790 A1003 80517 57740 A1010 44035 12365 ASPHALT PETROLEUM SPIRITS XYLENE CEMENT-PORTLAND HOODS TOLUENE TE1RAETHYL LEAD TETRAMETHYL LEAD GASOLINE-LEADED GRAPHITE OIL. LUBE TALC ASBESTOS SILICA. AMORPHOUS FUSED POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI) PHOSPHORUS SAND SILICA FLOUR MICA CADMIUM OXIDES NICKEL OXIDES PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER TRIMETHYLBENZENE GASOLINE. LEAD CONTENT UNKNOWN ASPHALT VOLATILES INORGANIC CHROMATES ZIHC CHLORIDE IRON OXIDES LEAD NAPHTHENATE BERYLLIUM OXIDES LEAD OXIDES MERCURY OXIDES THALLIUM OXIDES INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS ETHYLENE. TRICHLORQ- miGSTEH OXIDES SODIUM BORATE PHOSPHIHE VANADIUM OXIDES MANGANESE OXIDES ETHYLENE GLYCOL EXPOSURE FACTOR 1.606 693 667 574 358 510 487 487 341 420 293 356 226 300 209 209 275 236 236 159 159 220 146 146 144 137 137 186 116 115 115 115 115 115 162 159 157 88 115 115 70 EXPOSURE INDEX .422 .182 .175 .151 .094 .134 .128 .128 .089 .110 .077 .093 .059 .078 .055 .055 .072 .062 .062 .041 .041 .057 .038 .038 .037 .036 .036 .048 .030 .030 .030 .030 .030 .030 .042 .041 .041 .023 .030 .030 .018 HAZARD UEIGHT 10 10 07 07 10 07 07 07 10 07 10 07 10 07 10 10 07 07 07 10 10 07 10 10 10 10 10 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 07 07 10 07 07 10 UEIGHTEI INDEX 4.227 1.824 1.229 1.057 .942 .939 .897 .897 .897 .773 .771 .655 .594 .552 .550 .550 .506 .434 .434 .418 .418 .405 .384 .384 .37* .360 .360 .342 .305 .302 .302 .302 .302 .302 .29! .292 .281 .231 .211 .211 .184 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOUS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOUS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 1610 HIGHWAY AND STREET CONSTRUCTION DESCRIPTION NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 3.799 54 1 »-• K) Ul IHFOn CODE 0933 0527 0560 2229 1591 0230 0230 1591 0570 2000 1790 1380 0810 1371 1740 1957 0874 0310 0867 2620 1720 1290 2682 C2650 0230 0926 0505 1560 1,790 C0260 2020 1660 1060 0160 0020 2427 1591 0921 2540 NOHS CODE 81806 80243 17460 M1463 M1693 A1433 07310 42490 17490 M0600 80056 36955 21190 36060 47030 51705 24130 M2929 24003 M0626 46970 33640 80219 83341 M2725 27615 15705 40987 48628 07545 54790 45930 31500 20265 015(8 71900 M0125 25210 74990 DIETHYL PHTHALATE CARBON CARBON MONOXIDE IRON OXIDE, RED LEAD SOAP ANTIMONY SULFIDE ANTIMONY LEAD CARBON TETRACHLORIDE PARAFFIN MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE HEXANE CYCLOHEXANE HEPTANE METHYLCYCLOHEXANE OCTANE DICHLOROETHANE, 1.2- BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE DICHIOROBENZENE, ORTHO- ZIRCONIUM OXIDE TRICHLOROETHANE. 1,1.1- FORMALDEHYDE TETRAETHYLTHIURAM DISULFIDE MOCA AHTIMONY DIALKYLDITHIOCARBAMATE DIPHEIIYLAMINE C/LCIUM CARBONATE ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL MOLYBDENUM OXIDES ARSEHIC TETRACHLOROETHYLENE KETHAHOl ETHYL ALCOHOL ALUMINUM OXIDE ACETIC ACID TETRAMETHYLTHIURAM DISULFIDE LEAD MONOXIDE DIETHYLENETRIAMINE TURPENTINE EXPOSURE FACTOR 224 63 88 86 58 56 56 56 52 51 169 501 487 489 487 487 44 422 41 56 56 39 38 38 37 123 353 350 115 33 46 43 95 91 38 38 25 35 35 EXPOSURE INDEX .058 .016 .023 .022 .015 .014 .014 .014 .013 .013 .044 .131 .128 .128 .128 .128 .011 .111 .010 .014 .014 .010 .010 .010 .009 .032 .092 .092 .030 .008 .012 .011 .025 .023 .010 .010 .006 .009 .009 HAZARD WEIGHT 03 10 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 03 01 01 01 01 01 10 01 10 07 07 10 10 10 10 03 01 01 03 10 07 07 03 03 07 07 10 07 07 WEIGHTE INDEX .176 .165 .162 .158 .152 .147 .147 .147 .136 .134 .133 .131 .128 .128 .128 .128 .115 .111 .107 .103 .103 .102 .100 .100 .097 .097 .092 .092 .090 .086 .084 .079 .075 .071 .070 .070 .065 .064 .064 192 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 1610 OTHER TOTALS: 20.246 5.236 31 .600 image: ------- ilC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOUS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS . 1620 HEAVY CONSTRUCTION. EXCEPT HIGHWAY DESCRIPTION 44 IHFOM CODE 0490 1842 2080 1631 2037 1591 0360 2420 9050 9090 C9020 1520 t, 0560 =f 2570 M 1620 KJ 2229 *• 5010 2000 1842 1591 2590 0686 2090 1591 2490 1591 2532 9210 2611 0686 0374 1591 1340 2537 0290 2460 9030 0645 1790 0230 2360 NOHS CODE 15630 50495 57740 45315 M2829 42685 11855 72085 84055 17366 90310 40297 17460 A1010 44035 M1463 52131 M0600 84269 M1693 76720 80064 81650 81000 73790 M0751 82880 94220 77150 M0063 80517 91160 90880 A1003 90320 73300 71055 29010 48628 07310 71640 CADMIUM OXIDES NICKEL OXIDES PHOSPHINE MERCURY OXIDES PETROLEUM SPIRITS LEAD OXIDES BERYLLIUM OXIDES THALLIUM OXIDES SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED GRAPHITE ASBESTOS IRON OXIDES CARBON MONOXIDE VANADIUM OXIDES MANGANESE OXIDES IRON OXIDE. RED OIL. CUTTING PARAFFIN NICKEL OXIDE LEAD SOAP XYLENE POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI) PHOSPHORUS LEAD SUBOXIDE ETHYLENE. TRICHLORO- LEADED ZINC OXIDE PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER WOODS ZINC CHLORIDE INORGANIC CHROMATES SODIUM BORATE INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS GASOLINE-LEADED TUNGSTEN OXIDES ASPHALT TOLUENE TALC EPICHLOROHYDRIN MOLYBDENUM OXIDES ANTINOMY TETRAETHYL LEAD EXPOSURE FACTOR 806 806 759 751 750 725 724 724 1.031 972 552 774 759 724 724 582 398 397 389 372 519 362 348 346 482 333 465 314 292 287 402 268 258 355 246 339 338 235 724 207 278 EXPOSURE INDEX .207 .207 .195 .193 .193 .186 .186 .186 .265 .250 .142 .199 .195 .186 .186 .149 .102 .102 .100 .095 .133 .093 .089 .089 .124 .085 .119 .080 .075 .073 .103 .069 .066 .091 .063 .087 .087 .060 .186 .053 .071 HAZARD WEIGHTED WEIGHT INDEX 10 2.075 10 2.075 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 07 10 07 07 07 07 07 10 10 10 .954 .933 .930 .866 .864 .864 .858 .751 .421 .394 .367 .304 .304 .048 .024 .022 .001 10 .957 07 .935 10 .932 10 .895 10 .890 07 .868 10 .857 07 .838 10 .808 10 .751 10 .738 07 .724 10 .690 10 .664 07 .639 10 .633 07 .610 07 .609 10 .605 03 .559 10 .532 07 .501 image: ------- 1C INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 620 OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED IHDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS HEAVY CONSTRUCTION. EXCEPT HIGHWAY DESCRIPTION 3.884 44 IHFOM CODE 2370 0230 1591 1790 5010 1290 9010 2620 0577 1060 2040 1030 0933 > 0686 I 0760 *-• 0867 *•> 1591 1/1 0530 1980 2440 0730 2587 2540 0310 1520 1913 0160 2682 C2650 0686 C0260 0020 1520 1520 0522 1720 1018 COJ20 1660 NOHS CODE 71860 A1433 42490 80056 52138 33640 67915 M0626 17695 M0238 55460 04980 81806 81876 20380 24003 83453 17367 81651 A1211 20170 76618 74990 M2929 80990 52i8t> 20265 80219 83341 M0900 07545 01568 M0130 70131 15800 46970 M0347 09070 45930 TETRAMETHYL LEAD ANTIMONY SULFIDE LEAD MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE OIL. LUBE FORMALDEHYDE SAND ZIRCONIUM OXIDE CEMENT-PORTLAND ALCOHOL PHENOL ETHANOLAMINE DIETHYL PHTHALATE CHROMIC ACID. LEAD(2+) SALT (1:1) CPESOL DICHLOROBENZENE. ORTHO- LEAD NAPHTHENATE CARBON DIOXIDE OZONE TITANIUM. OXIDES OF COPPER OXIDES MELDING RODS TURPENTINE BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONAfE IRON OXIDE, YELLOW fcTHVLL.^C CLVCGL ALUMINUM OXIDE TETRAETHYLTHIURAM DISULFIDE MOCA CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04). ZINC SALT (1-1) ARSENIC ACETIC ACID FERROUS OXIDE IROh OXIDE (FE304) CAMPHOR TRICIILOROETHANE. 1.1,1- ETIIYLHEXYL) PHTHALAIE, BIS(2- BENZENE MEIIIAHOL EXPOSURE FACTOR 278 190 190 633 185 145 193 192 192 441 129 415 348 96 93 87 84 805 759 724 724 724 103 716 101 70 217 *4 64 61 60 7> 72 72 70 69 47 47 65 EXPOSURE INDEX .071 .048 .048 .162 .047 .037 .049 .049 .049 .113 .033 .106 .089 .024 .023 .022 .021 .207 .195 .186 .186 .186 .026 .184 .026 .018 .055 .016 .016 .015 .015 .019 .018 .018 .018 .017 .012 .012 .016 HAZARD WEIGHT 07 10 10 03 10 10 07 07 07 03 10 03 03 10 10 10 10 01 01 01 01 01 07 01 07 10 03 10 10 10 10 07 07 07 07 07 10 10 07 WEIGHTED INDEX .501 .489 .489 .488 .476 .373 .347 .346 .346 .340 .332 .320 .268 .247 .239 .223 .216 .207 .195 .186 .186 .186 .185 .184 .182 .180 .167 .164 .164 .157 .154 .138 .129 . 129 . 126 . 124 . 121 . 121 .117 222 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 1620 OTHER TOTALS: 38.700 9.865 60.607 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION PLUMBING, HEATING. AIR CONDITIONING DESCRIPTION LEAD OXIDES CADMIUM OXIDES NICKEL OXIDES LEAD SUBOXIDE OIL. CUTTING PETROLEUM SPIRITS LEAD SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED IRON OXIDES ANTIMONY ANTIMONY SULFIDE ZINC CHLORIDE BERYLLIUM OXIDES MERCURY OXIDES THALLIUM OXIDES IRON OXIDE, RED LEAD MONOXIDE LEAD TETROXIDE LEAD TRIOXIDE LEAD DIOXIDE GRAPHITE PHOSPHINE ASBESTOS TUNGSTEN OXIDES ZIRCONIUM OXIDE VANADIUM OXIDES MANGANESE OXIDES TOLUENE STANNIC OXIDE TIN OXIDES STANNOUS OXIDE XYLENE CRESOL CARBON MONOXIDE ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO- ASPHALT TRICHLOROETHANE. 1.1.1- CARDON TETRACHLORIDE DICHLOROETHANE. 1.2- CliLORIHE POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI) NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 2,365 55 IHFOM CODE 1591 0490 1842 1591 5010 2037 1591 9050 1520 0230 0230 2611 > 0360 1 1631 |- 2420 Ł 2229 1591 1591 1591 1591 9090 2080 C9020 2537 2620 2570 1620 2460 2432 2432 2432 2590 0760 0560 2490 0290 1720 0570 0874 0640 0656 NOHS CODE 42685 15630 50495 81000 52131 M2829 42490 84055 40297 07310 A1433 77150 11855 45315 72085 M1463 M0125 M0126 81677 84544 17366 57740 90310 A1003 M0626 A1010 44035 73300 M0877 73253 82157 76720 20380 17460 73790 90320 46970 17490 24130 1A040 A0064 EXPOSURE FACTOR 833 724 696 696 624 593 567 760 711 487 481 476 467 467 467 656 439 439 433 433 611 377 375 512 ^81 467 467 461 412 412 412 405 268 377 365 246 349 213 213 283 197 EXPOSURE INDEX .352 .306 .294 .294 .263 .250 .239 .321 .300 .205 .203 .201 .197 .197 .197 .277 .185 .185 .183 .183 .258 .159 .158 .216 .203 .197 .197 .194 .174 .174 .174 .171 .113 .159 .154 .104 .147 .090 .090 .119 .083 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 10 10 10 10 07 10 10 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 10 07 07 10 07 10 10 07 10 WEIGHTED INDEX 3.522 3.061 2.942 2.942 2.638 2.507 2.397 2.249 2.104 2.059 2.033 2.012 1.974 1.974 .974 .941 .856 .856 .830 .830 .808 .594 .585 .515 .423 .382 .382 1.364 1.219 1.219 .219 .198 .133 .115 .080 .040 .032 .900 .900 .837 .832 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAH TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOUS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS C INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION ID PLUMBING, HEATING, AIR CONDITIONING DESCRIPTION NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 2,365 55 1HFOM CODE 2090 C0320 2532 2170 2000 0867 1520 1520 1520 2037 0540 2020 1660 0160 1030 0527 1913 1790 1591 1430 2540 0220 C0260 0686 1591 1280 9210 1060 1842 0830 0686 1060 0933 9030 0374 0070 1790 1591 0820 NOHS CODE 81650 09070 82880 M0256 M0600 24003 M0130 70131 80990 M0630 17370 54790 45930 20265 04980 80243 32385 48628 M1693 38580 74990 06580 07555 81876 84546 81945 94220 M023B 84269 21660 M0063 31500 81806 71055 80517 03298 80056 91160 21560 PHOSPHORUS BEHZENE PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER PROPANOL. 1- PARAFFIN DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHO- FERROUS OXIDE IROH OXIDE (FE304) IRON OXIDE. YELLOW NAPHTHA-SOLVENT CARBON DISULFIDE TETRACHLOROETHYLENE METHANOL ALUMINUM OXIDE ETHANOLAMINE CARBON ETHYLENE GLYCOl MOLYBDENUM OXIDES LEAD SOAP HYDROGEN CHLORIDE TURPENTINE ANILINE ARSENIC OXIDES CHROMIC ACID, LEADC2+) SALT (1=1) LEAD SULFATE POTASSIUM BIFLUORIDE WOODS ALCOHOL NICKEL OXIDE CYCLOHEXAHONE INORGANIC CHROMATES ETHYL ALCOHOL DIETHYL PHTHALATE TALC SODIUM BORATE ACETYLENE MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS CYCLOHEXANOL 219 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 1710 OTHER TOTALS: EXPOSURE FACTOR 197 195 271 183 180 179 255 255 255 178 178 229 224 509 486 143 141 467 139 188 181 178 121 121 121 102 101 301 81 260 74 245 244 98 93 629 199 57 188 39,662 EXPOSURE INDEX .083 .082 .114 .077 .076 .075 .107 .107 .107 .075 .075 .096 .094 .215 .205 .060 .059 .197 .058 .079 .076 .075 .051 .051 .051 .043 .042 .127 .034 .109 .031 .103 .103 .041 .039 .265 .OA4 .024 .079 16.671 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 07 10 10 10 07 07 07 10 10 07 07 03 03 10 10 03 10 07 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 03 10 03 10 03 03 07 07 01 03 10 03 WEIGHTED INDEX .832 .824 .802 .773 .761 .756 .754 .754 .754 .752 .752 .677 .663 .645 .616 .604 .596 .592 .587 .556 .535 .526 .511 .511 .511 .431 .427 .381 .342 .329 .312 .310 .309 .290 .275 .265 .252 . 2<» 1 .238 101 .719 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 1720 PAINTING. PAPER HANGING, DECORATING DESCRIPTION ---NOHS SURVEYED--- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 537 16 IHFOM CODE 2037 0290 2460 C0320 9210 2590 C9020 9050 0686 1591 1591 C0260 1591 > 0686 ' 1913 Ł 1*60 oo 10U 1591 9090 2540 2000 2540 1591 1591 C0260 1631 1536 0230 0490 0720 1240 1842 2230 1660 0527 0374 2583 1620 9010 2620 OB74 NOHS CODE M2829 90320 73300 09070 94220 76720 90310 84055 81876 M0125 MO 126 07555 84546 M0900 32385 50742 M0347 80252 17366 74990 M0600 K1322 A1297 M0751 07545 45315 40430 07310 15570 19770 33595 50420 68295 45930 80243 80517 83011 44000 66405 77265 241 JO PETROLEUM SPIRITS ASPHALT TOLUENE BENZENE MOODS XYLENE ASBESTOS SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED CHROMIC ACID, LEAD(2O SALT (1:1) LEAD MONOXIDE LEAD TETROXIDE ARSENIC OXIDES LEAD SULFATE CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04), ZINC SALT (1:1) ETHYLENE GLYCOL NITRIC ACID ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BIS(2- LEAD CARBONATE GRAPHITE TURPENTINE PARAFFIN TURPENTINE (GUM) LEAD CARBONATE. BASIC LEADED ZINC OXIDE ARSENIC MERCURY OXIDES ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL ANTIMONY CADMIUM COBALT FLUORSPAR NICKEL SELENIUM METHANOL CARBON SODIUM BORATE DICHLOROETHYLENE. 1.1- MANGANESE QUARTZ ZIRCONIUM DICHLOROETHANE, 1.2- EXPOSURE FACTOR 278 271 302 202 186 210 140 193 135 119 119 105 105 104 102 93 89 86 122 116 78 107 72 72 72 72 71 69 69 69 69 69 69 94 60 75 50 69 69 69 48 EXPOSURE INDEX .517 .504 .562 .376 .346 .391 .260 .359 .251 .221 .221 .195 .195 .193 .189 .173 .165 .160 .227 .216 .145 .199 .134 .134 .134 .134 .132 .128 .128 .128 .128 .128 .128 .175 .111 .139 .093 . 128 . 128 .128 .089 HAZARD UEIGHTEC UEIGHT INDEX 10 5.176 10 5.046 07 3.936 10 3.761 10 3.463 07 2.737 10 2.607 07 2.515 10 2.513 10 2.216 10 2.216 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 07 10 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 10 .955 .955 .936 .899 .731 .657 .601 .590 .512 .452 .394 .340 .340 .340 .340 .322 .284 .284 .284 .284 .284 .284 .225 .117 07 .977 10 .931 07 .899 07 .899 07 .899 10 .893 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AMD ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY UEICHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 1720 PAINTING. PAPER HANGING, DECORATING DESCRIPTION NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 537 16 IHFOH CODE 1060 1060 0933 1170 1989 2229 1720 1779 0570 156A 0686 0645 > ll™ I 1591 )- 0630 to 0505 ^ 2610 9030 1230 2581 1520 0686 2090 1560 C9020 1591 2020 2490 0430 0170 0460 1010 1941 1970 9010 1610 1040 1520 1520 NOHS CODE 31500 M0218 81806 46935 54160 M1461 46970 48535 17490 41775 19395 29010 32550 42490 90510 15705 77HO 71055 32940 M1392 40297 80064 81650 40987 73525 84743 54790 73790 13980 05250 13850 25145 51090 52480 67915 80298 31470 70111 80990 ETHYL ALCOHOL ALCOHOL DIETHYL PHTHALATE ETHYLENE GLYCOL MONOMETHYL ETHER ACETATE PENTACHLOROPHEHOL IRON OXIDE. RED TRICHLOROETHANE. 1,1.1- MICA CARBON TETRACHLORIDE KAOLIN CHROMIUM EPICHLOROHYDRIN ETHYLENE OXIDE LEAD CHLOPODIPHENYLS CALCIUM CARBONATE ZINC OXIDE TALC ETHYL SILICATE VINYL CYCLOHEXENE DIOXIDE IRON OXIDES POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI) PHOSPHORUS ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL TREMOLITE LEAD SILICOCHROMATE TETRACHLOROETHYLENE ETHYLEHE, TRICHLORO- BUTANONE. 2- AMMONIA BUTANOL DIOXAHE. 1,4- NITROPROPANE, 2- OXALIC ACID SAND MAGNESIUM OXIDE ETHYL ACETATE IRON OXIDE (FE304) IRON OXIDE, YELLOW EXPOSURE FACTOR 159 140 133 117 50 48 48 47 32 308 30 30 30 30 30 276 247 35 71 30 30 21 21 205 19 19 26 26 180 24 167 16 16 16 22 115 131 19 19 EXPOSURE INDEX .296 .260 .247 .217 .093 .089 .089 .087 .059 .573 .055 .055 .055 .055 .055 .513 .459 .065 .132 .055 .055 .039 .039 .381 .035 .035 .048 .048 .335 .044 .310 .029 .029 .029 .040 .251 .247 .035 .035 HAZARD HEIGHT 03 03 03 03 07 07 07 07 10 01 10 10 10 10 10 01 01 07 03 07 07 10 10 01 10 10 07 07 01 07 01 10 10 10 07 01 01 07 07 WEIGHTED INDEX .888 .782 .743 .653 .651 .625 .625 .612 .595 .573 .558 .558 .558 .558 .558 .513 .459 .456 .396 .391 .391 .391 .391 .381 .353 .353 .338 .338 .335 .312 .310 .297 .297 .297 .286 .251 .247 .247 .247 154 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 1720 OTHER TOTALS 9.771 18.112 102.271 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 1730 ELECTRICAL UORK OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS -—NOHS SURVEYED— EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 3.456 43 H- OJ O IHFOM CODE 5010 2037 2000 2611 9090 0686 1591 2532 0290 C9020 0374 5010 9030 2490 1720 1591 0686 0230 9050 9210 1060 C0260 1591 0686 2090 2590 1591 1591 0640 1591 1591 1790 1591 0230 1030 0720 1970 1340 0527 2540 2460 NOHS CODE 52131 M2829 M0600 77150 17366 M0063 91160 82880 90320 90310 80517 52138 71055 73790 46970 83453 81876 07310 84055 94220 M0238 07555 84546 80064 81650 76720 M0125 M0126 18040 81000 42490 80056 42685 A1433 04980 80347 52480 M0541 M0647 74990 73100 DESCRIPTION OIL, CUTTING PETROLEUM SPIRITS PARAFFIN ZINC CHLORIDE GRAPHITE INORGANIC CHROMATES INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER ASPHALT ASBESTOS SODIUM BORATE OIL. LUBE TALC ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO- TRICHLOROETHANE. 1.1.1- LEAD HAPHTHENATE CHROMIC ACID. LEAD(2O SALT (1=1) AHTIMONY SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED WOODS ALCOHOL ARSENIC OXIDES LEAD SULFATE POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI) PHOSPHORUS XYLENE LEAD MONOXIDE LEAD TETROXIDE CHLORINE LEAD SUBOXIDE LEAD MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE LEAD OXIDES ANTIMONY SULFIDE ETHANOLAHINE COBALT NAPHTHENATE OXALIC ACID GASOLINES C.I. 77266-PIGMENT BLACK 7 TURPENTINE TOLUENE EXPOSURE FACTOR 1.150 1.032 972 624 816 561 559 776 507 497 691 477 625 573 556 352 326 319 454 299 987 287 287 283 283 355 238 238 340 235 226 734 218 211 685 201 200 199 199 263 257 EXPOSURE INDEX .332 .298 .281 .180 .236 .162 .161 .224 .146 .143 .199 .138 .180 .165 .160 .101 .094 .092 .131 .086 .285 .083 .083 .081 .081 .102 .068 .068 .098 .067 .065 .212 .063 .061 .198 .058 .057 .057 .057 .076 .074 HAZARD HEIGHT 10 10 10 10 07 10 10 07 10 10 07 10 07 07 07 10 10 10 07 10 03 10 10 10 10 07 10 10 07 10 10 03 10 10 03 10 10 10 10 07 07 WEIGHTED INDEX 3.327 2.986 2.812 1.805 1.652 1.623 1.617 1.571 1.467 .438 .399 .380 .265 .160 .126 .018 .943 .923 .919 .865 .856 .830 .830 .818 .818 .719 .688 .688 .688 .679 .653 .637 .630 .610 .594 .581 .578 .575 .575 .532 .520 image: ------- 1C 730 INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION ELECTRICAL WORK OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALfH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOUS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX UITH HOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOUS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 3,456 43 IHFOM CODE 1591 2229 1060 1591 1591 2620 1018 15)6 1779 0490 0720 1280 1842 2230 2432 2432 2432 1631 0490 1842 0926 0680 C2580 1620 9010 2620 0933 0360 2080 2420 0830 0577 1520 1430 0860 0160 2040 0760 0570 NOHS CODE M1693 M1463 31500 81677 84544 M0626 M0347 40430 48535 15570 19770 33595 50420 68295 M0877 73253 82157 45315 15630 50495 27615 18260 76445 44000 66495 77265 81806 11855 57740 72085 21660 17695 40297 38580 M4016 20265 55460 20380 17490 DESCRIPTION LEAD SOAP IRON OXIDE, RED ETHYL ALCOHOL LEAD TRIOXIDE LEAD DIOXIDE ZIRCONIUM OXIDE ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE. BIS(2- ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL MICA CADMIUM COBALT FLUORSPAR NICKEL SELENIUM STANNIC OXIDE TIN OXIDES STANMOUS OXIDE MERCURY OXIDES CADMIUM OXIDES NICKEL OXIDES DIPHENYLAMINE CHLOROPRENE VINYL CHLORIDE •MANGANESE QUARTZ ZIRCONIUM DIETHYL PHTHALATE BERYLLIUM OXIDES PHOSPHINE THALLIUM OXIDES CYCLOHEXANONE CEMENT-PORTLAND IRON OXIDES HYDROGEN CHLORIDE PEHTANONE. 4-HYDROXY-4-METHYL-, 2 ALUMINUM OXIDE PHENOL CRESOL CARBON TETRACHLORIDE EXPOSURE FACTOR 178 251 559 153 153 211 147 147 197 134 134 134 134 134 174 174 174 117 107 107 350 104 104 134 134 134 307 86 86 86 258 106 106 104 225 218 65 64 62 EXPOSURE INDEX .051 .072 .161 .044 .044 .061 .042 .042 .057 .038 .038 .038 .038 .038 .050 .050 .050 .033 .030 .030 .101 .030 .030 .038 .038 .038 .088 .024 .024 .024 .074 .030 .030 .030 .065 .063 .018 .018 .017 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 07 03 10 10 07 10 10 07 10 10 10 10 10 07 07 07 10 10 10 03 10 10 07 07 07 03 10 10 10 03 07 07 07 03 03 10 10 10 WEIGHTED INDEX .515 .508 .485 .442 .442 .427 .425 .425 .399 .387 .387 .387 .387 .387 .352 .352 .352 .338 .309 .309 .303 .300 .300 .271 .271 .271 .266 .248 .248 .248 .223 .214 .214 .210 .195 . 189 . 188 . 185 .179 235 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 1730 OTHER TOTALS- 37.998 10.865 66.724 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 1740 MASONRY, STONEWORK, AND PLASTERING DESCRIPTION -—NOHS SURVEYED— EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 1.663 41 IHFOM CODE 0577 9050 9210 C9020 0290 9010 9090 2037 9030 0527 2590 1430 ., 0686 •7 2090 M 1591 " 1018 •° 1536 1290 2040 0933 1520 0867 1170 2460 1340 0374 1591 0686 0630 0522 9050 2000 1779 2360 2370 9010 0360 0490 1591 1631 1842. NOHS CODE 17695 84055 94220 90310 90320 67915 17366 M2829 71055 80243 76720 38580 80064 81650 81000 M0347 40430 336-40 55460 81006 40297 24003 46935 73300 90680 80517 42490 1939S 90510 15800 M1532 M0600 48535 71640 71860 M1806 11855 15630 426B5 45315 50495 CEMENT-PORTLAND SILICA. AMORPHOUS FUSED WOODS ASBESTOS ASPHALT SAND GRAPHITE PETROLEUM SPIRITS TALC CARBON XYLENE HYDROGEN CHLORIDE POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI) PHOSPHORUS LEAD SUBOXIDE ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE. BIS(2- ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL FORMALDEHYDE PHENOL DIETHYL PHTHALATE IRON OXIDES DICHLOROBENZENE. ORTHO- ETHYLENE GLYCOL MONOMETHYL ETHER ACETATE TOLUENE GASOLINE-LEADED SODIUM BORATE LEAD CHROMIUM CHLORODIPHENYLS CAMPHOR SILICA GEL PARAFFIN MICA TETRAETHYL LEAD TETRAMETHYL LEAD SILICA FLOUR BERYLLIUM OXIDES CADMIUM OXIDES LEAD OXIDES MERCURY OXIDES NICKEL OXIDES EXPOSURE FACTOR 962 746 518 517 508 628 555 325 276 181 196 194 133 133 126 125 125 117 113 370 155 105 342 146 92 117 81 80 80 113 104 66 94 92 92 85 59 59 59 59 59 EXPOSURE INDEX .578 .448 .311 .310 .305 .377 ,333 .195 .165 .108 .117 .116 .079 .079 .075 .075 .075 .070 .067 .222 .093 .063 .205 .087 .055 .070 .048 .048 .048 .067 .062 .039 .056 .055 .055 .051 .035 .035 .035 .035 .035 HAZARD WEIGHT 07 07 10 10 10 07 07 10 07 10 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 03 07 10 03 07 10 07 10 10 10 07 07 10 07 07 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 WEIGHT INDEX 4.04 3.14 3.11 3.10 3.05 2.64 2.33 1.95 1.16 1.08 .82 .81 .79 .79 .75 .75 .75 .70 .67 .66 .65 .63 .61 .611 .5! .4* .41 .4; .4; .4i .4^ . 1 /f' . "-i ', • ^ . I a * ul • ** ,3i .3 .3 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AMD ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY UEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS C INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 40 MASONRY. STONEWORK, AND PLASTERING DESCRIPTION NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 1.663 41 1 (-• Ul Ul IHFOM CODE 2080 2420 2127 2581 15*8 1367 1913 2229 0515 C0260 0686 1591 2570 0560 1620 0570 2537 1230 0530 5010 0680 C2580 1626 0170 0505 1050 1774 0527 0686 0686 0686 0490 0490 1750 2612 0490 2532 1593 2610 NOHS CODE 57740 72085 M4257 83011 41775 90980 32385 M1463 15743 07555 81876 84546 A1010 17460 44035 17490 A1003 32940 15755 52131 18260 76445 MOB41 05250 15705 31490 47700 M0647 M0926 M1488 M2265 M2267 M2270 80105 82134 83628 82880 M1525 77190 1,1- PHOSPHINE THALLIUM OXIDES PLASTER DICHLOROETHYLENE, KAOLIN GYPSUM ETHYLENE GLYCOL IRON OXIDE, RED CALCIUM HYDROXIDE ARSENIC OXIDES CHROMIC ACID. LEAD<2») SALT (1=1) LEAD SULFATE VANADIUM OXIDES CARBON MONOXIDE MANGANESE OXIDES CARBON TETRACHLORIDE TUNGSTEN OXIDES ETHYL SILICATE CALCIUM OXIDE OIL. CUTTING CHLOROPRENE VINYL CHLORIDE MARBLE AMMONIA CALCIUM CARBONATE ETHYL ACRYLATE METHYL METHACRYLATE C.I. 77266-PIGMENT BLACK 7 C.I. 77600-PIGMENT YELLOW 34 CHROME ORANGE BARIUM CHROMATE C.I. 77196-PIGMENT ORANGE 20 C.I. 77199-PIGMEHT ORANGE 20 METHYL ETHYL KETOHE PEROXIDE C.I. 77955-PIGMENT YELLOW 36 CADMIUM SULFIDE PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER LIMESTONE ZINC OXIDE EXPOSURE FACTOR 59 59 585 51 483 475 46 63 441 44 44 44 59 59 59 41 58 125 366 36 35 35 308 44 306 40 40 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 37 227 209 EXPOSURE INDEX .035 .035 .351 .030 .290 .285 .027 .037 .265 .026 .026 .026 .035 .035 .035 .024 .034 .075 .220 .021 .021 .021 .185 .026 .184 .024 .024 .016 .016 .016 .016 .016 .016 .016 .016 .016 .022 .136 . 125 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 01 10 01 01 10 07 01 10 10 10 07 07 07 10 07 03 01 10 10 10 01 07 01 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 01 01 UEIGHTED INDEX .354 .354 .351 .306 .290 .285 .276 .265 .265 .264 .264 .264 .248 .248 .248 .246 .244 .225 .220 .216 .210 .210 .185 .185 .184 .168 .168 .162 .162 .162 .162 .162 .162 . 162 . 162 . 162 . 155 . in .125 203 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 1740 OTHER TOTALS: 16,762 9.992 54.451 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 1750 CARPENTERING AND FLOORING OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 580 20 IHFOM CODE 9210 0290 0577 2037 1240 C9020 9050 2460 2000 2040 1591 2590 9010 0374 0522 0527 0686 0630 9090 1520 9030 1520 0760 1660 1631 06Hb 2090 0686 0686 1060 1720 1591 1591 1591 1591 C0260 1010 1591 9210 19S9 0230 NOHS CODE 94220 90320 17695 M2829 33640 90310 84055 73300 M0600 55460 42490 76720 67915 80517 15800 80243 19395 90510 17366 40297 71055 70131 84266 45930 45315 80064 81650 81876 M0900 31500 46970 A1297 M0125 M0126 M0751 07545 25145 80252 M1327 54160 A143J DESCRIPTION MOODS ASPHALT CEMENT-PORTLAND PETROLEUM SPIRITS FORMALDEHYDE ASBESTOS SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED TOLUENE PARAFFIN PHENOL LEAD XYLENE SAND SODIUM BORATE CAMPHOR CARBON CHROMIUM CHLORODIPHENYLS GRAPHITE IRON OXIDES TALC IRON OXIDE (FE304) CRESOL. PARA- METHANOL MERCURY OXIDES PUlikSSIJM DICiiRGNATEtVi: PHOSPHORUS CHROMIC ACID, LEADC2+) SALT (1:1) CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04), ZIHC SALT (1U) ETHYL ALCOHOL TRICHLOROETHANE. 1,1.1- LEAD CARBONATE. BASIC LEAD MONOXIDE LEAD TETROXIOE LEADED ZINC OXIDE ARSENIC DIOXANE. 1.4- LEAD CARBONATE HOOD FIBER PEHTACHLOROPHENOL AHT1MOHY SULFIDE EXPOSURE FACTOR 345 153 216 118 94 93 119 116 72 67 61 84 75 71 67 45 44 44 57 48 46 44 27 35 23 21 21 21 20 66 28 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 18 25 17 EXPOSURE INDEX .594 .263 .372 .203 .162 .160 .205 .200 .124 .115 .105 .144 .129 .122 .115 .077 .075 .075 .098 .082 .079 .075 .046 .060 .039 .036 .036 .036 .034 .113 .048 .032 .032 .032 .032 .032 .032 .032 .031 .043 .029 HAZARD UEIGHT 10 10 07 10 10 10 07 07 10 10 10 07 07 07 07 10 10 10 07 07 07 07 10 07 10 10 10 10 10 03 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 10 WEIGHTED INDEX 5.948 2.637 2.606 2.034 1.620 1.603 1.436 1.400 1.241 1.155 1.051 1.013 .905 .856 .808 .775 .758 .758 .687 .579 .555 .531 .465 .422 .396 .362 .362 .362 .344 .341 .337 .327 .327 .327 .327 .327 .327 .327 .310 .301 .293 image: ------- ilC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 750 CARPENTERING AND FLOORING OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NONS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 580 20 IHFOM CODE 0230 0933 1340 2310 2532 1170 2229 2620 2360 2370 1430 1913 1568 0040 0505 0430 1650 0160 1560 1380 2490 2540 2170 2037 C0320 0540 0570 0760 0867 0874" 0440 2610 1367 1626 0310 0310 1385 1591 0360 NOHS CODE 07310 81806 90880 70870 82880 46935 M1463 M0626 71640 71860 38580 32385 41775 02820 15705 13980 46410 20265 40967 36955 73790 74990 M0256 M0630 09070 17370 17490 20380 24003 24130 14380 77190 90980 M0341 80341 83238 37510 M1693 11855 DESCRIPTION ANTIMONY DIETHYL PHTHALATE GASOLINE-LEADED SULFURIC ACID PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER ETHYLENE GLYCOL MONOMETHYL ETHER ACETATE IRON OXIDE. RED ZIRCONIUM OXIDE TETRAETHYL LEAD TETRAMETHYL LEAD HYDROGEN CHLORIDE ETHYLENE GLYCOL KAOLIN ACETONE CALCIUM CARBONATE BUTANONE. 2- METHYL ACETATE ALUMINUM OXIDE ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL HEXANE ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO- TURPENTINE PROPANOL, 1- NAPHTHA-SOLVENT BENZENE CARBON DISULFIDE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE CRESOL DICHLOROBENZENE. ORTHO- DICHLOROETHANE, 1,2- BUTYl ACETATE ZIHC OXIDE GYPSUM MARBLE BARIUM OXIDE BARIUM PEROXIDE METHYL-2-PENTANONE. 4- LEAD SOAP BERYLLIUM OXIDES EXPOSURE FACTOR 17 55 16 22 22 51 18 17 17 17 15 10 94 93 90 74 72 23 67 65 9 9 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 49 46 45 44 44 44 41 4 4 EXPOSURE INDEX .029 .094 .027 .037 .037 .087 .031 .029 .029 .029 .025 .017 .162 .160 .155 .127 .124 .039 .115 .112 .015 .015 .008 .008 .008 .008 .008 .008 .008 .008 .084 .079 .077 .075 .075 .075 .070 .006 .006 HAZARD UEIGHT 10 03 10 07 07 03 07 07 07 07 07 10 01 01 01 01 01 03 01 01 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 10 10 .293 .284 .275 .265 .265 .263 .217 .205 .205 .205 .181 .172 .162 .160 .155 .127 .124 .118 .115 .112 .108 .108 .086 .086 .086 .086 .086 .086 .086' .086 .084 .079 .077 .075 .075 .075 .070 .068 .068 150 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 1750 OTHER TOTALS: 4,359 7.429 45.185 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 1760 ROOFING AND SHEET METAL WORK OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOUS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED IHDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 2.259 56 IHFOM CODE 0290 2037 C9020 2460 2590 0290 0760 C0320 1810 2040 0170 0700 1591 9050 1340 1631 0490 1842 0686 0360 2080 2420 2360 2370 9210 1520 0686 C0260 2090 1591 2537 2229 2570 0560 1620 1591 1591 1.591 2611 0230 0230 NOHS CODE 90320 M2829 90310 73300 76720 80636 20380 09070 49600 ' 55460 05250 90620 42685 84055 90880 45315 15630 50495 81876 11855 57740 72085 71640 71860 94220 40297 80064 07555 81650 84546 A1003 M1463 A1010 17460 44035 M0125 M0126 42490 77150 07310 A141J DESCRIPTION ASPHALT PETROLEUM SPIRITS ASBESTOS TOLUENE XYLENE ASPHALT VOLATILES CRESOL BENZENE NAPHTHALENE PHENOL AMMONIA COAL TAR PITCH VOLATILES LEAD OXIDES SILICA. AMORPHOUS FUSED GASOLINE-LEADED MERCURY OXIDES CADMIUM OXIDES NICKEL OXIDES CHROMIC ACID. LEAD<2O SALT (1 = 1) BERYLLIUM OXIDES PHOSPHINE THALLIUM OXIDES TETRAETHYL LEAD TETRAMETHYL LEAD WOODS IRON OXIDES POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI3 ARSEHIC OXIDES PHOSPHORUS LEAD SULFATE TUNGSTEN OXIDES IRON OXIDE. RED VANADIUM OXIDES CARBON MONOXIDE MANGANESE OXIDES LEAD MONOXIDE LEAD TETROXIDE LEAD ZINC CHLORIDE ANTIMONY ANTIMONY SULFIDE EXPOSURE FACTOR 1.920 1.075 1.074 966 945 630 587 578 574 574 613 391 320 416 279 265 247 247 227 225 225 225 316 316 220 302 210 183 183 183 229 227 225 225 225 157 157 151 ua 124 122 EXPOSURE INDEX .849 .475 .475 .427 .418 .278 .259 .255 .254 .254 .271 .173 .141 .184 .123 .117 .109 .109 .100 .099 .099 .099 .139 .139 .097 .133 .092 .081 .081 .081 .101 .100 .099 .099 .099 .069 .069 .066 .061 .054 .054 HAZARD HEIGHT 10 10 10 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 07 10 10 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 07 10 07 10 10 10 10 07 07 07 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 WEIGHTED INDEX 8.499 4.758 4.754 2.993 2.928 2.788 2.598 2.558 2.540 2.540 1.899 1.730 1.416 1.289 1.235 1.173 1.093 1.093 1.004 .996 .996 .996 .979 .979 .973 .935 .929 .810 .810 .810 .709 .703 .697 .697 .697 .694 .694 .668 .610 .548 .540 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 1760 OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS ROOFING AND SHEET METAL UORK DESCRIPTION 2,259 56 IHFOM CODE 1591 1591 1591 1430 9090 1300 1018 1536 9085 0577 2620 9210 0933 > 2432 I 2432 M 2432 ^ 0527 1591 5010 9030 1842 2490 1790 0374 2220 9010 0160 0686 0636 1591 1340 1591 9010 C0260 2610 2000 1591 1591 0680 NOHS CODE 81000 81677 84544 38580 17366 33245 M0347 404 iO 68768 17695 M0626 M1327 81806 M0877 73253 82157 80243 M0751 52138 71055 84269 73790 48628 80517 65080 M1806 20265 M0063 M0900 83453 90885 91160 67915 07545 77190 M0600 A1297 80252 18260 LEAD SUBOXIDE LEAD TRIOXIDE LEAD DIOXIDE HYDROGEN CHLORIDE GRAPHITE FIBERGLASS ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE. BIS(2- ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL SOAPSTOHE CEMENT-PORTLAND ZIRCONIUM OXIDE WOOD FIBER DIETHYL PHTHALATE STANNIC OXIDE TIN OXIDES STANNOUS OXIDE CARBON LEADED ZINC OXIDE OIL, LUBE TALC NICKEL OXIDE ETHVLENE. TRICHLORO- MOLYBDENUM OXIDES SODIUM BORATE PYRIDINE SILICA FLOUR ALUMINUM OXIDE INORGANIC CHROMATES CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04), ZINC SALT (1:1) LEAD NAPHTHENATE GASOLINE-UNLEADED INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS SAND ARSENIC ZIIIC OXIDE PARAFFIN LEAD CARBONATE, BASIC LEAD CARBONATE CHLOROPRENE EXPOSURE FACTOR 117 117 117 157 153 145 99 99 133 132 122 84 278 117 117 117 80 77 77 106 71 100 225 86 574 74 169 50 49 49 48 48 68 42 417 41 40 40 39 EXPOSURE INDEX .051 .051 .051 .069 .067 .064 .043 .043 .058 .058 .054 .037 .123 .051 .051 .051 .035 .034 .034 .046 .031 .044 .099 .038 .254 .032 .074 .022 .021 .021 .021 .021 .030 .018 .184 .018 .017 .017 .017 HAZARD HEIGHT 10 10 10 07 07 07 10 10 07 07 07 10 03 07 07 07 10 10 10 07 10 07 03 07 01 07 03 10 10 10 10 10 07 10 01 10 10 10 10 UEIGHTED INDEX .517 .517 .517 .486 .474 .449 .438 .438 .412 .409 .378 .371 .369 .362 .362 .362 .354 .340 .340 .328 .314 .309 .298 .266 .254 .229 .224 .221 .216 .216 .212 .212 .210 .185 .184 . 181 .177 .177 .172 226 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 1760 OTHER TOTALS: 28,585 12.530 85.231 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NQHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION MISC. SPECIAL TRADE CONTRACTORS DESCRIPTION NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 2,358 45 IHFOM CODE 1591 0490 1842 0360 1631 2420 9050 2080 1520 2037 9210 2537 2570 > 1620 1 0560 »-• 2532 m 2590 0290 2460 5010 C9020 1591 1591 0230 2490 0230 1790 2611 0527 1913 2229 9090 2620 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 2020 5010 9030 NOHS CODE 42685 15630 50495 11855 45315 720S5 84055 57740 40297 M2829 94220 A1003 A1010 44035 17460 82880 76720 90320 73300 52138 90310 42490 83453 07310 73790 A1433 48628 77150 80243 32385 M1463 17366 M0626 M0125 M0126 81000 8U77 84544 54790 52131 71055 LEAD OXIDES CADMIUM OXIDES NICKEL OXIDES BERYLLIUM OXIDES MERCURY OXIDES THALLIUM OXIDES SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED PHOSPHINE IRON OXIDES PETROLEUM SPIRITS MOODS TUNGSTEN OXIDES VANADIUM OXIDES MANGANESE OXIDES CAROOU MONOXIDE PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER XYLENE ASPHALT TOLUENE OIL. LUBE ASBESTOS LEAD LEAD NAPHTHENATE ANTIMONY ETHYLENE. TRICHLORO- ANTIMONY SULFIDE MOLYBDENUM OXIDES ZINC CHLORIDE CARBON ETHYLENE GLYCOL IRON OXIDE. RED GRAPHITE ZIRCONIUM OXIDE LEAD MONOXIDE LEAD TETROXIDE LEAD SUBOXIDE LEAD TRIOXIDE LEAD DIOXIDE TEfRACHLOROETHYLEHE OIL. CUTTING TALC EXPOSURE FACTOR 640 626 626 587 587 587 836 582 688 455 441 625 587 587 582 477 463 278 388 248 246 220 207 199 264 182 587 175 175 152 214 204 199 122 122 105 105 105 142 90 126 EXPOSURE INDEX .271 .265 .265 .248 .248 .248 .354 .246 .291 .192 .187 .265 .248 .248 .246 .202 .196 .117 .164 .105 .104 .093 .087 .084 .111 .077 .248 .074 .074 .064 .090 .086 .084 .051 .051 .044 .044 .044 .060 .038 .053 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 10 07 10 10 07 07 07 07 07 07 10 07 10 10 10 10 10 07 10. 03 10 10 10 07 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 07 10 07 WEIGHTED INDEX 2.714 2.654 2.654 2.489 2.489 2.489 2.481 2.468 2.042 .929 .870 .855 .742 .742 .727 .416 .374 .178 .151 .051 .043 .932 .877 .843 .783 .771 .746 .742 .742 .644 .635 .605 .590 .517 .517 .445 .445 .445 .421 .381 .374 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION MISC. SPECIAL TRADE CONTRACTORS DESCRIPTION NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 2.358 45 IHFOM CODE 1660 2432 0160 2432 2432 0686 0680 C2580 1591 0374 0926 2000 0640 > 0730 I 0577 J-* 2440 Ł 0530 2587 1980 1280 2360 2370 1430 1060 0686 2090 1018 1536 1340 1591 0686 0630 9010 0933 OJ10 0505 1100 1720 1790 NOHS CODE 45930 73253 20265 M0877 82157 M0063 18260 76445 91160 80517 27615 M0600 18040 20170 17695 A1211 17367 76618 81651 81945 71640 71860 38580 31500 80064 81650 M0347 40430 90880 M1693 19395 90510 67915 81806 M2929 15705 33245 46970 80056 METHANOL TIN OXIDES ALUMINUM OXIDE STANNIC OXIDE STAHKOUS OXIDE INORGANIC CHROMATES CHLOROPRENE VINYL CHLORIDE INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS SODIUM BORATE DIPHENYLAMINE PARAFFIN CHLORINE COPPER OXIDES CEMENT-PORTLAND TITAIIIUM. OXIDES OF CARBON DIOXIDE MELDING RODS OZOHE POTASSIUM BIFLUORIDE TETRAETHYL LEAD TETRAMETHYL LEAD HYDROGEN CHLORIDE ETHYL ALCOHOL POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI) PHOSPHORUS ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE. BIS(2- ISOBUTfL ALCOHOL GASOLINE-LEADED LEAD SOAP CHROMIUM CHLOROD1PHENYLS SAND DIETHYL PHTHALATE BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE CALCIUM CARBONATE FIBFRGLASS TrMCHLOROETHANE. 1.1.1- HOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE EXPOSURE FACTOR 122 122 248 105 105 66 64 64 64 88 201 60 85 591 84 587 585 587 582 55 67 67 64 144 43 43 42 42 42 38 38 38 46 107 298 298 42 40 90 EXPOSURE INDEX .051 .051 .105 .044 .044 .027 .027 .027 .027 .037 .085 .025 .036 .250 .035 .248 .248 .248 .246 .023 .028 .028 .027 .061 .018 .018 .017 .017 .017 .016 .016 .016 .019 .045 .126 .126 .017 .016 .038 HAZARD HEIGHT 07 07 03 07 07 10 10 10 10 07 03 10 07 01 07 01 01 01 01 10 07 07 07 03 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 03 01 01 07 07 03 WEIGHTED INDEX .362 .362 .315 .311 .311 .279 .271 .271 .271 .261 .255 .254 .252 .250 .249 .248 .248 .248 .246 .233 .198 .198 .189 .183 .182 .182 .178 .178 .178 .161 .161 .161 .136 .136 .126 . 126 . 124 . 118 . 114 225 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 1790 OTHER TOTALS: 25.271 10.611 66.415 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOUS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS ilC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION !OB6 BOTTLED AND CANNED SOFT DRINKS DESCRIPTION --- NOHS SURVEYED --- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 16 IHFOM CODE 9090 0290 1060 9210 2037 2590 1340 2000 2460 1591 2360 2370 9050 > 2490 ' 2532 Ł 5010 o 0686 0933 1170 0374 1913 1790 2611 0686 0867 1591 1591 1520 2540 0490 1842 2080 C9020 9030 0230 0230 2229 1720 0170 0360 1591 NOHS CODE 17366 90320 31500 94220 M2829 76720 90880 M0600. 73300 M1693 71640 71860 84055 73790 82880 52138 81876 81806 46935 80517 32385 80056 77150 M0063 24003 42490 91160 40297 74990 15630 50495 57740 90310 71055 A1433 07310 M1463 46970 05250 11855 42685 GRAPHITE ASPHALT ETHYL ALCOHOL MOODS PETROLEUM SPIRITS XYLENE GASOLINE-LEADED PARAFFIN TOLUENE LEAD SOAP TETRAETHYL LEAD TETRAMETHYL LEAD SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO- PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER OIL. LUBE CHROMIC ACID, LEAD(2+) SALT mi) DIETHYL PHTHALATE ETHYLENE GLYCOL MONOMETHYL ETHER ACETATE SODIUM BORATE ETHYLENE GLYCOL MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE ZINC CHLORIDE INORGANIC CHROMATES DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHO- LEAD INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS IRON OXIDES TURPENTINE CADMIUM OXIDES NICKEL OXIDES PHOSPHINE ASBESTOS TALC ANTIMONY SULFIDE ANTIMONY IRON OXIDE, RED TRICHLOROETHANE, 1,1.1- AnrtONIA BERYLLIUM OXIDES LEAD OXIDES EXPOSURE FACTOR 272 183 545 153 150 190 132 107 147 101 132 132 125 123 116 71 71 154 151 58 40 123 33 30 30 30 30 40 35 24 24 24 24 34 22 22 30 29 27 19 19 EXPOSURE INDEX .191 .128 .384 .107 .105 .133 .093 .075 .103 .071 .093 .093 .088 .086 .081 .050 .050 .108 .106 .040 .028 .086 .023 .021 .021 .021 .021 .028 .024 .016 .016 .016 .016 .023 .015 .015 .021 .020 .019 .013 .013 HAZARD HEIGHT 07 10 03 10 10 07 10 10 07 10 07 07 07 07 07 10 10 03 03 07 10 03 10 10 10 10 10 07 07 10 10 10 10 07 10 10 47 07 07 10 10 WEIGHTED INDEX 1.341 1.289 1.152 1.078 1.057 .937 .930 .754 .725 .711 .651 .651 .616 .606 .572 .500 .500 .325 .319 .286 .281 .260 .232 .211 .211 .211 .211 .197 .172 .169 .169 .169 .169 .167 .155 .155 .147 .143 .133 .133 .133 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS sic INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 2006 BOTTLED AND CANNED SOFT DRINKS DESCRIPTION NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 1,419 16 IHFOM CODE 1631 2420 1591 2537 0560 0760 1290 1591 2620 1568 C0260 0310 0530 j* 0527 I 2570 - 0810 ^ 1371 1380 1620 1740 1957 1989 2040 1060 2260 0020 2310 0874 0430 1389 0522 1660 0160 0570 1520 15?0 1520 9050 1A60 NOHS CODE 45315 72085 83453 A1003 17460 20380 33640 84546 M0626 41775 07555 M2929 17367 80243 A1010 21190 36060 36955 44035 47030 51705 54160 . 55460 M0238 69070 01568 70870 24130 13980 37510 15800 45930 20265 17490 M0130 70131 80990 M1532 50742 MERCURY OXIDES THALLIUM OXIDES LEAD NAPHTHENATE TUNGSTEN OXIDES CARBON MONOXIDE CRESOL FORMALDEHYDE LEAD SULFATE ZIRCONIUM OXIDE KAOLIN ARSENIC OXIDES BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE CARBON DIOXIDE CARBON VANADIUM OXIDES CYCLOHEXANE HEPTANE HEXANE MANGANESE OXIDES METHYLCYCLOHEXANE OCTANE PENTACHLOROPHENOL PKE»!OL ALCOHOL SODIUM HYDROXIDE ACETIC ACID SULFURIC ACID DICHLOROETHANE, 1,2- BUTANONF. 2~ METHYL-2-PENTANONE, 4- CAMPHOR METHANOL ALUMIIIUM OXIDE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE FERROUS OXIDE IRON OXIDE (FE304) IRON OXIDE, YELLOW SILICA GEL NITRIC ACID EXPOSURE FACTOR 19 19 18 24 24 16 16 16 22 151 15 145 142 14 19 132 132 132 19 132 132 19 13 42 115 16 16 11 103 98 13 13 28 a 11 11 11 10 7 EXPOSURE INDEX .013 .013 .012 .016 .016 .011 .011 .011 .015 .106 .010 .102 .100 .009 .013 .093 .093 .093 .013 .093 .093 .013 .009 .029 .081 .011 .011 .007 .072 .069 .009 .009 .019 .005 .007 .007 .007 .007 . 004 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 10 07 07 10 10 10 07 01 10 01 01 10 07 01 01 01 07 01 01 07 10 03 01 07 07 10 01 01 07 07 03 10 07 07 07 07 10 .133 .133 .126 .118 .118 .112 .112 .112 .108 .106 .105 .102 .100 .098 .093 .093 .093 .093 .093 .093 .093 .093 .091 .088 .081 .078 .078 .077 .072 .069 .064 .064 .059 .056 .054 .054 .054 . 049 .049 218 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 2086 OTHER TOTALS: 6,913 4.775 24.433 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 2434 MOOD KITCHEN CABINETS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS —NOHS SURVEYED— EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 1.637 17 IHFOM CODE 9210 2460 2590 2037 2040 2532 1290 C0320 0374 0522 1860 1018 0680 1060 2000 9210 1591 0230 0230 0290 1660 9050 1536 0527 2229 C2580 2620 1060 0160 C9020 2611 1560 0460 0040 0440 0874 1040 1540 0760 5010 1720 NOHS CODE '• 94220 73300 76720 M2C29 55460 82880 33640 09070 80517 15800 50742 M0347 18260 31500 M0600 M1327 •42490 A1433 07310 90320 45930 84055 40430 80243 M1465 76445 M0626 M0238 20265 90310 77150 40987 13850 02820 14380 24130 31470 40984 20380 52138 46970 DESCRIPTION MOODS TOLUENE XYLENE PETROLEUM SPIRITS PHENOL PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER FORMALDEHYDE BENZENE SODIUM BORATE CAMPHOR NITRIC ACID ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BIS(2- CHLOROPRENE ETHYL ALCOHOL PARAFFIN WOOD FIBER LEAD ANTIMONY SULFIDE ANTIMONY ASPHALT METHANOL SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL CARBON IRON OXIDE, RED VINYL CHLORIDE ZIRCONIUM OXIDE ALCOHOL ALUMINUM OXIDE ASBESTOS ZINC CHLORIDE ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL BUTANOL ACETONE BUTYL ACETATE DICHLOROETHANE. 1,2- ETHYL ACETATE ISOPROPYL ACETATE CRESOL OIL. LUBE TR1CHLOROETHAHE, 1,1.1- EXPOSURE FACTOR 1,646 1,709 1,357 678 626 874 592 441 621 577 378 326 318 1.024 305 279 264 257 257 254 327 326 205 199 272 132 257 427 422 124 123 ,219 ,213 .196 ,084 104 .036 ,017 97 85 116 EXPOSURE INDEX 1.005 1.043 .828 .414 .382 .533 .361 .269 .379 .352 .230 .199 .194 .625 .186 .170 .161 .156 .156 .155 .199 .199 .125 .121 .166 .111 .156 .260 .257 .075 .075 .744 .740 .730 .662 .063 .632 .621 ,059 .051 .070 HAZARD WEIGHTED WEIGHT INDEX 10 10.054 07 7.307 07 5.802 10 4.141 10 3.824 07 3.737 10 3.616 10 2.693 07 2.655 07 2.467 10 2.309 10 10 03 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 07 10 10 07 10 07 .991 .942 .876 .863 .704 .612 .569 .569 .551 .398 .394 .252 .215 .163 .111 .098 03 .782 03 .773 10 .757 10 .751 01 .744 01 .740 01 .730 01 .662 10 .635 01 .632 01 .621 10 .592 10 .519 07 .496 image: ------- INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION MOOD KITCHEN CABINETS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OTFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX UITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 1,637 17 IHFOM CODE 0720 1842 1989 1430 1650 2490 2310 1610 2570 1620 2223 1010 1941 9090 0686 C0260 1591 2037 0430 1380 1591 0570 0867 2135 2170 0735 0540 0686 2090 9050 1520 2020 2540 0860 1105 90)0 15)4 0220 1280 NOHS CODE 19770 50420 54160 38580 46410 73790 7C870 80298 M1727 44030 67405 25145 51090 17356 81876 07555 84546 M0630 13980 36955 83453 17490 24003 80221 M0256 94040 17370 80064 81650 M1532 40297 54790 74990 M4016 37510 71055 40410 06580 86 205 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 24)4 OTHER TOTALS: 30,944 18.79) 98.48) image: ------- INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION UOOD PARTITIONS AND FIXTURES OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS —-NOHS SURVEYED--- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 838 12 IHFOM CODE 9210 2460 0230 0230 1591 2037 9050 2590 2229 2620 0290 C0320 2000 2540 2532 1290 2037 2490 9090 2040 9210 0874 0160 2540 0570 0867 2170 0540 0760 0686 1660 2080 1060 C0260 1842 1591 1720 0374 0522 1520 1660 NOHS CODE 94220 73300 07310 A1433 42490 M2829 84055 76720 M1463 M0626 90320 09070 M0600 74990 82880 33640 M0630 73790 17366 55460 M1327 24130 20265 M1322 17490 24003 M0256 17370 20380 81876 45930 57740 31500 07555 84269 84546 46970 80517 15800 40297 50742 DESCRIPTION WOODS TOLUENE ANTIMONY ANTIMONY SULFIDE LEAD PETROLEUM SPIRITS SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED XYLENE IRON OXIDE, RED ZIRCONIUM OXIDE ASPHALT BENZENE PARAFFIN TURPENTINE PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER FORMALDEHYDE NAPHTHA-SOLVENT ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO- GRAPHITE PHENOL WOOD FIBER DICHLOROETHANE, 1,2- ALUMINUM OXIDE TURPENTINE (GUM) CARBON TETRACHLORIDE DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHO- PROP AHOL. 1- CARBON DISULFIDE CRESOL CHROMIC ACID. LEADC2+) SALT (1:1) METHAHOL PHOSPHINE ETHYL ALCOHOL ARSENIC OXIDES NICKEL OXIDE LEAD SULTATE TRICHLOROETHANE, 1.1,1- SODIUI1 DORATE CAMPHOR IRON OXIDES NITRIC ACID EXPOSURE FACTOR 571 374 211 209 209 208 278 276 224 212 148 128 103 147 144 98 96 128 127 87 86 86 284 120 84 83 82 82 82 81 113 79 262 76 76 76 102 99 92 90 61 EXPOSURE INDEX .681 .446 .251 .249 .249 .248 .331 .329 .267 .252 .176 .152 .122 .175 .171 .116 .114 .152 .151 .103 .102 .102 .338 .143 .100 .099 .097 .097 .097 .096 .134 .094 .312 .090 .090 .090 .121 .118 .109 .107 .072 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 07 10 10 10 10 07 07 07 07 10 10 10 07 07 10 10 07 07 10 10 10 03 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 10 03 10 10 10 07 07 07 07 10 WEIGHTED INDEX 6.813 3.124 2.517 2.494 2.494 2.482 2.322 2.305 1.871 1.770 1.766 .527 .229 .227 .202 .169 .145 .069 .060 .038 .026 .026 .016 1.002 1.002 .990 .978 .978 .978 .966 .943 .942 .937 .906 .906 .906 .852 .826 .768 .751 .727 image: ------- INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION WOOD PARTITIONS AND FIXTURES OCCUPATIONAL SAFETT AND HEALIH ADfll N 1 5 I R A t I ON OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOUS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 838 12 IHFOH CODE 2020 0220 0560 1060 0040 2611 C9020 0527 0720 1536 1842 1018 1560 0820 0860 0924 0440 1030 5010 0460 1430 1970 0620 0830 2190 0933 1540 1040 2232 0430 1631 0170 2310 2570 0680 1913 1620 2223 C2580 NOHS CODE 54790 06580 17460 M0238 02820 77150 90310 80243 19770 40430 50420 M0347 40987 21560 MAO 16 25820 14380 04980 52138 13850 38580 52480 18190 21660 24390 81806 40984 31470 M1720 13980 45315 05250 70870 M1727 18260 32385 44030 67405 76445 DESCRIPTION TETRACHLOROETHYLENE ANILINE CARBON MONOXIDE ALCOHOL ACETONE ZINC CHLORIDE ASBESTOS CARBOH COBALT ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL NICKEL ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BIS(2- ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL CYCLOHEXANOL PENTANONE, 4-HYDROXY-4-HETHYL-, 2- DIMETHfL-4-HEPTANONE, 2,6- BUTYL ACETATE ETHANOLAMINE OIL. LUBE BUfANOL HYDROGEN CHLORIDE OXALIC ACID CHLOROBENZENE CYCLOHEXANONE D1CHLOROPROPANE. 1,2- UlcTri'iL ?i!T!IAi.ATC ISOPROPYl ACETATE ETHYL ACETATE RUBBER SOLVENT BUTAMONE, 2- MERCURY OXIDES AMMONIA SULFURIC ACID VANADIUM OXIDE CHLOROPREUE ETHYLEIIE GLYCOL MANGANESE DIOXIDE RHODIUM VINYL CHLORIDE EXPOSURE FACTOR 86 82 82 161 343 34 34 33 32 32 32 30 299 96 94 94 281 91 27 266 37 25 82 82 82 82 242 33 224 22 31 31 30 21 21 30 30 21 EXPOSURE INDEX .102 .097 .097 .192 .409 .040 .040 .039 .038 .038 .038 .035 .356 .114 .112 .112 .335 .108 .032 .317 .044 .029 .097 .097 .097 .097 .288 .260 .039 .267 .026 .036 .036 .035 .025 .025 .035 .035 .025 HAZARD WEIGHT 07 07 07 03 01 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 01 03 03 03 01 03 10 01 07 10 03 03 03 03 01 01 07 01 10 07 07 07 10 10 07 07 10 WEIGHTED INDEX .718 .684 .684 .576 .409 .405 .405 .393 .381 .381 .381 .357 .356 .343 .336 .336 .335 .325 .322 .317 .309 .298 .293 .293 .293 .293 .288 .280 .275 .267 .262 .258 .258 .250 .250 .250 .250 .250 .250 217 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 2541 OTHER TOTALS'- 12.890 15.270 82.818 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 2751 COMMERCIAL PRINTING, LETTERPRESS DESCRIPTION ---NOHS SURVEYED—- EMPLOYMEHT FIRMS 3,665 38 IHFOM CODE 2037 0290 2170 1913 2460 C0320 0874 0570 2590 0527 0760 1720 1620 0540 0867 2037 2490 1060 1660 0686 2540 2020 1591 1591 0686 0220 1591 C0260 0686 0686 9030 0374 1591 1591 1591 1591 0170 5010 9050 0230 0527 NOHS CODE, M2829 90320 M0256 32385 73300 09070 24130 17490 76720 80243 20380 46970 M0921 17370 24003 M0630 73790 31500 45930 M0926 74990 54790 M0125 M0126 81876 06580 84546 07555 M1488 M1499 71055 80517 42685 81000 81677 84544 05250 52138 A4055 07310 M0647 1.1.1- PETROLEUM SPIRITS ASPHALT PROPANOL, 1- ETHYLENE GLYCOL TOLUENE BENZENE DICHLOROETHANE, 1,2- CARBON TETRACHLORIDE XYLENE CARBON CRESOL TRICHLOROETHANE, MANGANESE DRIER CARBON DISULFIDE DICHLOROBENZENE. ORTHO- NAPHTHA -SOL VENT ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO- ETHYL ALCOHOL METHANOL C.I. 77600-PIGMENT YELLOW 34 TURPENTINE TETRACHLOROETHYLENE LEAD MONOXIDE LEAD TETROXIDE CHROfllC ACID, LEAD(2+) SALT (1:1) ANILINE LEAD SULFATE ARSENIC OXIDES CHROME ORANGE CHROME GREEN TALC SODIUM BORATE LEAD OXIDES LEAD SUBOXIDE LEAD TRIOXIDE LEAD DIOXIDE AMMONIA OIL. LUBE SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED ANTIMONY C.I. 77266-PIGMENT BLACK 7 EXPOSURE FACTOR 1,894 1,309 1.280 1,202 1,686 892 789 783 1,077 724 694 990 841 565 565 564 754 1,739 680 471 645 640 445 445 414 566 394 392 385 375 480 438 305 290 290 290 394 271 357 245 234 EXPOSURE INDEX .516 .357 .349 .327 .460 .243 .215 .213 .293 .197 .189 .270 .229 .154 .154 .153 .205 .474 .185 .128 .175 .174 .121 .121 .112 .154 .107 .106 .105 .102 .130 .119 .083 .079 .079 .079 .107 .073 .097 .066 .063 HAZARD WEIGHTED WEIGHT INDEX 10 5.167 10 3.571 10 3.492 10 3.279 07 3.220 10 2.433 10 2.152 10 2.136 07 2.057 10 10 07 07 10 10 10 07 03 07 10 07 07 10 10 10 07 10 10 10 10 .975 .893 .890 .606 .541 .541 .538 .440 .423 .298 .285 .231 .222 .214 .214 .129 .081 .075 .069 .050 .023 07 .916 07 .836 10 .832 10 .791 10 .791 10 .791 07 .752 10 .739 07 .681 10 .668 10 .638 image: ------- OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION COMMERCIAL PRINTING, LETTERPRESS DESCRIPTION NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 3,665 38 INFOM CODE 0020 0860 0230 0230 0230 0830 0820 1591 0720 1860 1018 9090 2310 _ 1030 •f C9020 H. 1536 *» 1591 -J 0620 2190 0924 1941 2432 2432 2432 0490 1280 1842 2230 2000 0430 1010 1540 1430 1560 1620 0720 9010 2620 1060 NOHS CODE 01568 M4016 A1640 A1641 07328 21660 21560 83453 19770 50742 M0347 17366 70870 04980 90310 40430 42490 18190 24390 25820 51090 M0877 73253 82157 15570 33595 50420 68295 M0600 13980 25145 40984 38580 40987 44000 80347 66495 77265 M0238 ACETIC ACID PENTANONE, 4-HYDROXY-4-METHYL-. 2- AHTIMOHY OXIDE SB205 ANTIMONY OXIDE (SB204) ANTIMONY OXIDES CYCLOHEXAHOME CYCLOHEXANOL LEAD NAPHTHENATE COBALT NITRIC ACID EIHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BISC2- GRAPHITE SULFUR1C ACID ETHANOLAMINE ASBESTOS ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL LEAD CHLOROBENZENE DICHLOROPROPANE, 1.2- DIMETHYL-4-HEPTAHONE, 2,6- HITROPROPANE, 2- SIANNIC OXIDE TIN OXIDES STANNOUS OXIDE CADMIUM FLUORSPAR NICKEL SELENIUM PARAFFIN BUTAHONE. 2- DIOXANE. 1.4- ISOPROPYL ACETATE HYDROGEN CHLORIDE ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL MANGANESE COBALT NAPHTHENATE QUARTZ ZIRCONIUM ALCOHOL EXPOSURE FACTOR 313 703 208 208 208 671 661 196 187 187 184 258 256 591 177 176 171 564 564 564 162 225 225 225 155 155 155 155 154 1,504 149 1,385 197 1,224 160 111 155 155 EXPOSURE INDEX .085 .191 .056 .056 .056 .183 .180 .053 .051 .051 .050 .070 .069 .161 .048 .048 .046 .153 .153 .153 .044 .061 .061 .061 .042 .042 .042 .042 .042 .410 .040 .377 .053 .333 .043 .030 .042 .042 .093 HAZARD WEIGHT 07 03 10 10 10 03 03 10 10 10 10 07 07 03 10 10 10 03 03 03 10 07 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 01 10 01 07 01 07 10 07 07 03 WEIGHTED INDEX .597 .575 .567 .567 .567 .549 .541 .534 .510 .510 .502 .492 .488 .483 .482 .480 .466 .461 .461 .461 .442 .429 .429 .429 .422 .422 .422 .422 .420 .410 .406 .377 .376 .333 .305 .302 .296 .296 .279 260 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 2751 OTHER TOTALS: 62,976 17.071 93. 378 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION —NOHS SURVEYED--- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 2752 COMMERCIAL PRINTING. LITHOGRAPHIC DESCRIPTION 1,270 26 00 IHFOM CODE 2037 0290 2460 2170 1913 C0320 ,2590 1720 0874 1620 0760 5010 0570 2490 0527 9090 0867 C9020 0527 1060 0540 1660 1591 0374 2037 2020 1860 1018 •1536 9030 0020 2540 2000 1290 2310 2532 0220 1970 1010 9210 1941 NOHS CODE M2829 90320 73300 M0256 32385 09070 76720 46970 24130 M0921 20380 52138 17490 73790 80243. 17366 24003 90310 M0647 31500 17370 45930 83453 80517 M0630 54790 50742 M0347 40430 71055 01568 74990 M0600 33640 70870 82880 06580 52480 25145 94220 51090 PETROLEUM SPIRITS ASPHALT TOLUEHE PROPAHOL, 1- ETHYLEIIE GLYCOL BENZENE XYLENE TRICHLOROETHANE, 1.1.1- DICHLOROETHAHE. 1,2- MANGANESE DRIER CRESOL OIL, LUBE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ETHYLENE. TRICHLORO- CAROON GRAPHITE DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHO- ASBESTOS C.I. 77266-PIGMENT BLACK 7 ETHYL ALCOHOL CARBON DISULFIDE METHANOL LEAD HAPHTHENATE SODIUM BORATE NAPHTHA-SOLVENT TETRACHLOROETHYLENE NITRIC ACID ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE. BISC2- ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL TALC ACETIC ACID TURPEHTINE PARAFFIN FORMALDEHYDE SULFURIC ACID PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER ANILINE OXALIC ACID DIOXAME. 1.4- UOODS MI1ROPROPANE. 2- EXPOSURE FACTOR 623 460 630 411 384 348 403 402 276 346 205 203 196 260 176 251 175 169 158 514 152 215 149 209 145 196 136 128 126 180 178 176 123 118 167 158 151 102 97 96 92 EXPOSURE INDEX .490 .362 .496 .323 .302 .274 .317 .316 .217 .272 .161 .159 .154 .204 .138 .197 .137 .133 .124 .404 .119 .169 .117 .164 .114 .154 .107 .100 .099 .141 .140 .138 .096 .092 .131 .124 .118 .080 .076 .075 .072 HAZARD WEIGHTED WEIGHT INDEX 10 4.905 10 3.622 07 3.472 10 3.236 10 3.023 10 2.740 07 2.221 07 2.215 10 2.173 07 10 10 10 07 10 07 10 10 10 03 10 07 10 07 10 07 10 10 .907 .614 .598 .543 .433 .385 .383 .377 .330 .244 .214 .196 .185 .173 .151 .141 .080 .070 .007 10 .992 07 .992 07 .981 07 .970 10 .968 10 .929 07 .920 07 .870 07 .832 10 .803 10 .763 10 .755 10 .724 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFtIT MHU nt.ni.in Muninia•K»i•un OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION COMMERCIAL PRINTING, LITHOGRAPHIC DESCRIPTION NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 1.270 26 IHFOM CODE 9050 0860 0686 0720 1591 1430 1560 0690 1340 2611 0720 2042 1842 2080 ? 2505 M 1060 .u 1631 ^ 1591 0830 0170 0720 1591 1591 0686 0430 0686 1591 0560 0686 0820 1591 2683 1620 1030 1810 1540 0620 2190 0924 NOHS CODE 84055 M4016 80064 81777 M1693 38580 40987 82232 90885 77150 80347 56950 50420 57740 74405 M0238 84274 84473 21660 05250 19770 M0125 M0126 81876 13980 M0063 91160 17460 M0926 21560 42490 82226 60490 04980 49600 40984 18190 24390 25820 SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED PENTANONE, 4-HYDROXY-4-METHYL-, 2- POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI) CODALTOUS ACETATE LEAD SOAP HYDROGEN CHLORIDE ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL CHROMIC POTASSIUM SULFATE GASOLIHE-UNLEADED ZINC CHLORIDE COBALT NAPHTHENATE PHENYLENEDIAMINE, PARA- NICKEL PHOSPHINE TRIMETHYLBENZENE ALCOHOL MERCURIC CHLORIDE LEAD NITRATE CYCLOHEXANONE AMMONIA COBALT LEAD MONOXIDE LEAD TETROXIDE CHROMIC ACID, LEAD(2+) SALT (1:1) BUTANONE, 2- INORGAMIC CHROMATES INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS CARBON MONOXIDE C.I. 77600-PIGMENT YELLOW 34 CYCLOHEXANOL LEAD BUTYLATED HYDROXYTOLUENES POTASSIUM PERMANGANATE ETHAMOLAMINE NAPHTHALENE ISOPROPYL ACETATE CHIOROBENZENE DlCHlORaPROPAHE, 1.2- DIMETHYL-4-HEPTANONE. 2.6- EXPOSURE FACTOR 129 254 76 76 74 104 725 68 68 66 65 91 62 62 62 204 58 58 187 79 55 54 54 54 515 51 51 72 48 160 47 67 65 151 44 436 145 145 145 EXPOSURE INDEX .101 .200 .059 .059 .058 .081 .570 .053 .053 .051 .051 .071 .048 .048 .048 .160 .045 .045 .147 .062 .043 .042 .042 .042 .405 .040 .040 .056 .037 .125 .037 .052 .051 .118 .034 .343 .114 .114 .114 HAZARD WEIGHT 07 03 10 10 10 07 01 10 10 10 10 07 10 10 10 03 10 10 03 07 10 10 10 10 01 10 10 07 10 03 10 07 07 03 10 01 03 03 03 WEIGHTED INDEX .711 .600 .598 .598 .582 .573 .570 .535 .535 .519 .511 .501 .488 .488 .488 .481 .456 .456 .441 .435 .433 .425 .425 .425 .405 .401 .401 .396 .377 .377 .370 .369 .358 .356 .346 .343 .342 .342 .342 242 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 2752 OTHER TOTALS: 24,050 18.812 97.450 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 2819 OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS —-NOHS SURVEYED--- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS INDUSTRIAL INORGANIC CHEMICALS. NEC. DESCRIPTION 2,268 10 H1 cn O IHFOM CODE C0320 2037 0170 9050 2590 0570 1*30 2460 1660 1591 5010 2310 2490 2611 9090 0874 1591 1860 0560 1842 0374 0760 2170 0490 0540 0360 1631 2420 2020 0867 C9020 0686 0670 2532 2080 5010 2090 2229 0527 0290 14SO NOHS CODE 09070 M2829 05250 84055 76720 17490 38580 73300 45930 42685 52131 70870 73790 77150 17366 24130 42490 50742 17460 50495 80517 20380 M0256 15630 17370 11855 45315 72085 54790 24003 90310 80064 18500 82880 57740 52138 81650 M1463 80243 90320 JB620 BENZENE PETROLEUM SPIRITS AKKONIA SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED XYLENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE HYDROGEN CHLORIDE TOLUENE METHANOL LEAD OXIDES OIL, CUTTING SULFURIC ACID ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO- ZINC CHLORIDE GRAPHITE DICHLOROETHANE, 1,2- LEAD NITRIC ACID CARBON MONOXIDE NICKEL OXIDES SODIUM BORATE CRESOL PROPANOL. 1- CADMIUM OXIDES CARBON DISULFIDE BERYLLIUM OXIDES MERCURY OXIDES THALLIUM OXIDES TETRACHLOROETHYLENE DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHO- ASBESTOS POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI) CHLOROFORM PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER PHOSPHINE OIL. LUBE PHOSPHORUS IRON OXIDE. RED CARBON ASPHALT HYDROGEN SULFIDE EXPOSURE FACTOR 396 383 546 411 406 277 393 383 358 217 205 273 268 187 248 173 172 172 240 168 240 162 160 160 155 153 153 153 208 143 143 141 140 200 138 135 134 189 131 128 179 EXPOSURE INDEX .174 .168 .240 .181 .179 .122 .173 .168 .157 .095 .090 .120 .118 .082 .109 .076 .075 .075 .105 .074 .105 .071 .070 .070 .068 .067 .067 .067 .091 .063 .063 .062 .061 .088 .060 .059 .059 .083 .057 .056 .078 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 07 07 07 10 07 07 07 10 10 07 07 10 07 10 10 10 07 10 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 10 10 10 10 07 10 10 10 07 10 10 07 WEIGHTED INDEX .746 .688 .685 .268 .253 .221 .212 .182 .104 .956 .903 .842 .827 .824 .765 .762 .758 .758 .740 .740 .740 .714 .705 .705 .683 .674 .674 .674 .641 .630 .630 .621 .617 .617 .608 .595 .590 .583 .577 .564 .552 image: ------- INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 2819 INDUSTRIAL INORGANIC CHEMICALS, NEC. DESCRIPTION 2,26ft 10 1 I-1 Ul t—1 IHFOH CODE 1290 2093 2037 0230 0230 1520 1060 2537 0020 2570 1620 0220 2040 1591 1720 2540 0686 2000 1591 1591 9210 1591 1591 9030 1913 0640 2620 1591 1460 1591 1591 1591 0390 2085 0160 1842 1790 1030 1018 NOHS CODE 33640 59166 M0630 07310 A1433 40297 31500 A1003 0156A A1010 44035 06580 55460 83453 46970 74990 M0063 M0600 91160 84544 94220 M0751 M1693 71055 32385 18040 M0626 M0126 38550 M0125 81000 81677 13100 58520 20265 84269 80056 04980 M0347 FORMALDEHYDE PHOSPHORUS TRICHLORIDE NAPHTHA-SOLVENT ANTIMONY ANTIMONY SULFIDE IRON OXIDES ETHYL ALCOHOL TUNGSTEN OXIDES ACETIC ACID VANADIUM OXIDES MANGANESE OXIDES ANILINE PHENOL LEAD NAPHTHENATE TRICHLOROETHANE, 1,1,1- TURPENTINE INORGANIC CHROMATES PARAFFIN INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS LEAD DIOXIDE WOODS LEADED ZINC OXIDE LEAD SOAP TALC CTHVI rye r,| vmt CHLORINE ZIRCONIUM OXIDE LEAD TETROXIDE HYDROGEN FLUORIDE LEAD MONOXIDE LEAD SUBOXIDE LEAD TRIOXIDE BROMINE PHOSPHORIC ACID ALUMINUM OXIDE NICKEL OXIDE MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE ETHANOLAMINE ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BIS(2- EXPOSURE FACTOR 121 170 118 116 114 162 375 160 159 153 153 149 101 99 141 139 91 91 90 87 87 86 85 121 83 115 114 76 76 74 74 74 99 667 220 64 202 196 57 EXPOSURE INDEX .053 .074 .052 .051 .050 .071 .165 .070 .070 .067 .067 .065 .044 .043 .062 .061 .040 .040 .039 .038 .038 .037 .037 .053 .036 .050 .050 .033 .033 .032 .032 .051 .043 .294 .097 .028 .089 .086 .025 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 07 10 10 10 07 03 07 07 07 07 07 10 10 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 10 07 07 10 10 10 10 i o 07 01 03 10 03 03 10 WEIGHTED INDEX .533 .524 .520 .511 .502 .499 .496 .493 .490 .472 .472 .459 .445 .436 .435 .429 .401 .401 .396 .383 .383 .379 .374 .373 .365 .354 .351 .335 .335 .326 .326 .J<:6 .305 .294 .291 .282 .267 .259 .251 472 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 2819 OTHER TOTALS: 27.931 12.072 68.746 image: ------- ur HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN AMU AHALI:>I:> .1C INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 821 PLASTICS MATERIALS AND RESINS TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS -—NOHS SURVEYED--- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 1.341 12 IHFOM CODE C0320 2037 2460 0290 1913 2170 2590 2490 0760 1860 0570 0867 > 0540 I 2037 ^ 0874 Ł 1660 1620 2020 1720 2540 0220 1018 5010 0527 1060 9050 1591 2532 9090 0860 1030 1060 0830 0924 C2580 0820 0620 2190 9210 9050 1591 NOHS CODE 09070 M2829 ; 73300 90320 32385 M0256 76720 73790 20380 50742 17490 24003 17370 M0630 24130 45930 M0921 54790 46970 74990 06580 M0347 52138 80243 31500 84055 83453 82880 17366 M4016 04980 M0238 21660 25820 76445 21560 18190 24390 94220 H15J2 91160 DESCRIPTION BENZENE PETROLEUM SPIRITS TOLUENE ASPHALT ETHYLENE GLYCOL PROPANOL, 1- XYLENE ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO- CRESOL NITRIC ACID CARBON TETRACHLORIDE OICHLOROBENZENE. ORTHO- CARBOtl DISULFIDE NAPHTHA-SOLVENT DICHIOROETHANE, 1,2- METHANOL MANGANESE DRIER TETRACHLOROETHYLENE TRICHLOROETHANE, 1.1.1- TURPENTINE ANILINE ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BIS<2- OIL, LUBE CARBON ETHYL ALCOHOL SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED LEAD NAPHTHENATE PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER GRAPHITE PEHTANONE, 4-HYDROXY-4-METHYL-, 2- ETHANOLAMINE ALCOHOL CYCLOHEXANONE DIMETHYL-4-HEPTANOHE, 2,6- VINYL CHLORIDE CYCLOHEXANOL CHLOROBENZENE DICHLOROPROPANE, 1.2- UOOU5 SILICA GEL INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS EXPOSURE FACTOR 649 583 804 519 465 443 547 530 354 342 335 333 328 327 327 466 427 397 357 339 327 190 171 163 502 199 126 170 164 351 349 348 345 345 99 329 327 327 97 116 81 EXPOSURE INDEX .483 .434 .599 .387 .346 .330 .407 .395 .263 .255 .249 .24S .244 .243 .243 .347 .318 .296 .266 .252 .243 .141 .127 .121 .374 .148 .093 .126 .122 .261 .260 .259 .257 .257 .073 .245 .243 .243 .072 .086 .060 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 07 10 10 10 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 07 07 07 07 07 10 10 10 03 07 10 07 07 03 03 03 03 03 10 03 03 03 10 07 10 WEIGHTED INDEX 4.839 4.347 4.196 3.870 3.467 3.303 2.855 2.766 2.639 2.550 2.498 2.483 2.445 2.438 2.438 2.432 2.228 2.072 .863 .769 .706 .416 .275 .215 .123 .038 .939 .887 .856 .785 .780 .778 .771 .771 .738 .736 .731 .731 .723 .605 .604 image: ------- INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION PLASTICS MATERIALS AND RESINS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HtAllM MuniniaiKniiun OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOUS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS ---NOHS SURVEYED--- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 1,341 12 IHFOfl CODE 0430 2229 1040 2040 9030 1560 0950 0933 0527 1385 0374 0040 1730 > 1540 I 0686 H- 0490 S 1591 ..1073 C9020 0440 0930 2611 0440 0435 1430 0686 1290 1538 18*2 0926 1610 1075 0686 0686 1033 1210 H50 0191 2310 NOHS CODE 13980 M1463 31470 55460 71055 40987 59210 81806 M0647 37510 80517 02820 47270 40984 81876 83628 84546 27780 90310 13850 26560 77150 14380 29930 38580 19360 33640 40910 84269 27615 80298 83448 M0063 M0926 31350 32590 46410 M1226 70870 DESCRIPTION BUTANONE. 2- IROM OXIDE. RED ETHYL ACETATE PHENOL TALC ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL DIMETHYL PHTHALATE DIETHYL PHTHALATE C.I. 77266-PIGMEHT BLACK 7 METHYL-2-PENTANONE. 4- SODIUM BORATE ACETONE DICHLOROMETHANE ISOPROPYL ACETATE CHROMIC ACID. LEAD(2+> SALT (1:1) CADMIUM SULFIDE LEAD SULFATE METHYLENE BISPHENYL ISOCYANATE ASBESTOS BUTANOL FORMAMIDE, N.H-DIMETHYL- ZINC CHLORIDE BUTYL ACETATE ETHANOL, 2-BUTOXY- HYDROGEN CHLORIDE CHROMIC ACID FORMALDEHYDE ISOPHOROME NICKEL OXIDE DirHENYLAMINE MAGNESIUM OXIDE MEIHYL-3-HEPTAHONE, 5- 1MORGANIC CHROMATES C.I. 77600-PIGMENT YELLOW 34 ETHOXYETHANOL, 2- ETHYL ETHER METHYL ACbTATE ACETIC ACID, PENTYL ESTER SULFURIC ACID EXPOSURE FACTOR 772 101 601 57 81 538 172 169 50 479 65 449 439 432 40 40 40 56 39 382 127 37 358 357 51 35 35 350 35 116 347 345 34 34 337 336 314 329 47 EXPOSURE INDEX .575 .075 .448 .042 .060 .401 .128 .126 .037 .357 .048 .334 .327 .322 .029 .029 .029 .041 .029 .284 .094 .027 .266 .266 .038 .026 .026 .260 .026 .086 .258 .257 .025 .025 .251 .250 .249 .245 .035 HAZARD WEIGHT 01 07 01 10 07 01 03 03 10 01 07 01 01 01 10 10 10 07 10 01 03 10 01 01 07 10 10 01 10 03 01 01 10 10 01 01 01 01 o; WEIGHTED INDEX .575 .527 .448 .425 .422 .401 .384 .378 .372 .357 .339 .334 .327 .322 .298 .298 .298 .292 .290 .284 .284 .275 .266 .266 .266 .260 .260 .260 .260 .259 .258 .257 .253 .253 .251 .250 .249 .245 .245 256 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 2821 OTHER TOTALS: 27,985 20.729 102.657 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 2834 PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS ---NOHS SURVEYED— EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 1,480 15 IHFOM CODE 2037 C0320 0527 2000 0170 1660 2040 0874 0570 9050 2460 0374 2590 1430 > 0760 ' 2540 Ł 0867 *. 1860 1060 0020 1720 2490 0540 2170 2037 0720 1591 1620 1620 2310 0670 0220 2020 1060 2229 1010 1913 1797 90)0 1290 9085 NOHS CODE M2829 09070 80243 M0600 05250 45930 55460 24130 17490 84055 73300 80517 76720 38580 20380 74990 24003 50742 31500 01568 46970 73790 17370 M0256 M0630 M1023 M1690 81680 80454 70870 18500 06580 54790 M0238 M1463 25145 32385 48910 71055 J 1640 68768 DESCRIPTION PETROLEUM SPIRITS BENZENE CARBON PARAFFIN AMMONIA METHANOL PHENOL DICHLOROETHANE, 1,2- CARBON TETRACHLORIDE SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED TOLUENE SODIUM BORATE XYLENE HYDROGEN CHLORIDE CRESOL TURPENTINE DICHLOROBENZENE. ORTHO- NITRIC ACID ETHYL ALCOHOL ACETIC ACID TRICHLOROETHANE, 1,1.1- ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO- CARBON DISULFIDE PROPAHOL. 1- NAPHTHA-SOLVENT COBALTOUS SULFATE LEAD MONOXIDE FISHATE MANGANESE SULFATE MANGANESE GLUCONATE SULFURIC ACID CHLOROFORM ANILINE TETRACHLOROETHYLENE ALCOHOL IRON OXIDE. RED DIOXAHE, 1.4- ETHYLENE GLYCOL MORPHOLINE TAIC FORMALDEHYDE SOAPSIONE EXPOSURE FACTOR 391 352 348 323 442 427 289 288 276 376 367 365 333 328 223 315 198 192 635 267 259 253 176 175 172 167 166 236 234 229 156 219 202 430 162 102 88 291 124 81 107 EXPOSURE INDEX .264 .237 .235 .218 .298 .288 .195 .194 .186 .254 .247 .246 .225 .221 .150 .212 .133 .129 .429 .180 .175 .170 .118 .118 .116 .112 .112 .159 .158 .154 .105 .147 .136 .290 .109 .068 .059 .196 .083 .054 .072 HAZARD WEIGHTED HEIGHT INDEX 10 2.641 10 2.378 10 2.351 10 2.182 07 2.090 07 2.019 10 10 10 07 07 07 07 07 10 07 10 10 03 07 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 07 07 07 10 07 .952 .945 .864 .778 .735 .726 .575 .551 .506 .489 .337 .297 .287 .262 .225 .196 .189 .182 .162 .128 .121 .116 .106 .083 .054 .035 07 .955 03 .871 07 .766 10 .689 10 .594 03 .589 07 .586 10 .547 07 .506 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION ?834 PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEAITH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 1,480 13 IHFOM CODE 9210 1190 0830 2611 1030 0820 0160 0860 C0120 0686 1560 0620 2190 •> 0924 I 9090 - 1340 ~" 0645 •" C2580 2583 2475 C1815 0760 1390 2577 0040 5010 0390 1280 0230 0640 0505 1620 1730 1591 2)60 2370 0529 1615 2470 NOHS CODE 94220 32550 21660 77150 04980 21560 20265 M4016 03800 60370 40987 18190 24390 25820 17366 90880 29010 76445 83011 83655 84304 84364 84394 84575 02820 52131 13100 84425 07370 18040 15705 44030 47270 M1693 71640 71860 84027 80144 73)90 DESCRIPTION WOODS ETHYLENE OXIDE CYCLOHEXANONE ZINC CHLORIDE ETHANOLAMINE CYCLOHEXANOL ALUMINUM OXIDE PENTANONE, 4-HYDROXY-4-METHYL-, 2- ACRYLONITRILE POTASSIUM CHROMATE ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL CHLOROBENZENE DICHLOROPROPANE. 1.2- DIMEIHYL-4-HEPTANONE. 2.6- GRAPHITE GASOLINE-LEADED EPICHLOROHYDRIN VINYL CHLORIDE D1CHLOROETHYLENE, 1.1- TOLUIDINE NAPHTHYLAMINE, ALPHA- CRESOL. ORTHO- DIAMINES VINYL BROMIDE ACETONE OIL. CUTTING BROMINE SODIUM FLUORIDE ANTIMONY POTASSIUM TARTRATE CHLORINE CALCIUM CARBONATE MANGANESE DIOXIDE DICHLOROMETHANE LEAD SOAP TETRAETHYL LEAD TETRAI1ETHYI LEAD CYCLOhEXENE-l,2-DICARBOXlMIDE, N-(1RICHLOROMETHYL)THIO-. MAGNESIUM CARBONATE TOLUENE-2.4-D1ISOCYANATE 4- EXPOSURE FACTOR 75 67 219 63 190 187 186 180 53 53 518 172 172 172 73 51 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 469 46 64 43 41 57 392 56 383 38 51 51 49 339 48 EXPOSURE INDEX .050 .045 .147 .042 .128 .126 .125 .121 .035 .035 .350 .116 .116 .116 .049 .034 .031 .031 .031 .031 .031 .031 .031 .031 .316 .031 .043 .029 .027 .038 .264 .037 .258 .025 .034 .034 .03) .229 .032 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 03 10 03 03 03 03 10 10 01 03 03 03 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 01 10 07 10 10 07 01 07 01 10 07 07 07 01 07 .506 .452 .443 .425 .385 .379 .377 .364 .358 .358 .350 .348 .348 .348 .345 .344 .317 .317 .317 .317 .317 .317 .317 .317 .316 .310 .302 .290 .277 .269 .264 .264 .258 .256 .241 .241 .251 .229 .227 356 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 28)4 OTHER TOTALS; 26.390 17.674 86 907 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 2879 AGRICULTURAL CHEMICALS, NEC. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS -—NOHS SURVEYED--- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 56 1 > 1 I— 1 en a\ IHFOM CODE 9210 0374 1913 2037 1369 9090 2170 0645 2040 2590 1660 2310 2216 2540 1620 9050 2425 0020 1310 0527 0170 1060 0933. 1060 0525 1720 1984 1791 0850 1616 1292 0760 1536 0290 2460 5010 1591 2020 2490 2532 0686 NOHS CODE 94220 80517 32385 M2829 35960 17366 M0256 29010 55460 76720 45930 70870 65070 74990 81680 84055 28880 01568 33720 80243 05250 31500 81806 M0238 47800 46970 53920 80790 M0377 80046 84454 20380 40430 90320 73300 52138 83453 54790 7J790 62880 A1227 DESCRIPTION WOODS SODIUM BORATE ETHYLENE GLYCOL PETROLEUM SPIRITS HEPTACHLOR GRAPHITE PROPANOL, 1- EPICHLOROHYDRIN PHEHOL XYLENE METHANOL SULFURIC ACID PYRETHRUM TURPENTINE MANGANESE SULFATE SILICA. AMORPHOUS FUSED END05ULFAN ACETIC ACID FORMIC ACID CARBON AMMONIA ETHYL ALCOHOL DIETHYL PHTHALATE ALCOHOL NAPHTHYL N-METHYLCARBAMATE, 1- TRICHLOROETHANE. 1,1.1- PARATHION AMMONIUM MOLYBDATE(VI) PHOSPHORIC ACID, 2,2-DICHLOROVINYL DIMETHYL ESTER DIETHYL MERCAPTOSUCCINATE, 0,0- DIMETHYLDITHIOPHOSPHATE OF FORMAMIDE CRESOL ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL ASPHALT TOLUENE OIL, LUBE LEAD NAPHTHENATE TETRACHLOROETHYLENE ETHYLENE. TR1CHLORO- PHOSPHORIC ACID, TR'ITOLYL ESTER ORGANIC CHROMIUM COMPOUNDS EXPOSURE FACTOR 20 24 16 15 15 21 14 14 14 19 18 17 16 16 16 16 15 14 14 8 11 21 20 19 17 7 7 16 15 15 14 4 4 4 5 3 3 3 3 3 2 EXPOSURE INDEX .357 .428 .285 .267 .267 .375 .250 .250 .250 .339 .321 .303 .285 .285 .285 .285 .267 .250 .250 .142 .196 .375 .357 .339 .303 .125 .125 .285 .267 .267 .250 .071 .071 .071 .089 .053 .053 .053 .053 .053 .035 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 07 10 10 10 07 10 10 10 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 10 07 03 03 03 03 07 07 03 03 03 03 10 10 10 07 10 10 07 07 07 10 WEIGHTED INDEX 3.571 2.999 2.857 2.678 2.678 2.625 2.500 2.500 2.500 2.374 2.249 2.124 .999 .999 .999 .999 .874 .750 .750 .428 .374 .125 .071 .017 .910 .875 .875 .857 .803 .803 .750 .714 .714 .714 .624 .535 .535 .374 .374 .374 .357 image: ------- 5IC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION ?879 AGRICULTURAL CHEMICALS, NEC. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 56 IHFOM CODE C0320 0540 0670 0515 2065 0505 1610 1522 1615 1560 0460 2584 2220 > 2431 I 1170 i- 1680 12 1630 ^ C0120 0570 1140 0867 0868 0874 0847 2611 1340 0926 1790 0675 0790 1595 1430 1989 22?8 2360 2370 2427 0710 0310 NOHS CODE 09070 17370 18500 15743 58520 80165 80298 33230 80144 40987 13850 49580 65080 83921 46935 M0420 M0475 03800 17490 23660 24003 24006 24130 73750 77150 90880 27615 80056 M0419 M2865 09318 38560 54160 67530 71640 71860 71900 M0628 M2929 DESCRIPTION BENZENE CARBON DISULFIDE CHLOROFORM CALCIUM HYDROXIDE PHOSPHORIC ACID DOLOMITE MAGNESIUM OXIDE FERROUS SULFATE MAGNESIUM CARBONATE ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL BUTAHOL NAPHTHA-COAL TAR PYRIDINE ORGANIC TIN COMPOUNDS ETHYLENE GLYCOL MOHOMETHYL ETHER ACETATE BROMOMETHANE MERCURY-CONTAINING ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS ACRYLONITRILE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE DIBROMOETHAHE, 1,2- DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHO- DICHLOROBEHZENE, PARA- DICHLOROETHAHE, 1,2- DICHLORODIPHENYLTRICHLOROETHANE ZINC CHLORIDE GASOLIHE-LEADED DIPHEHYLAMINE MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE TRICHLOROHITROMETHAHE CALCIUM CYANIDE LINDANE HYDROGEH CHLORIDE PEHTACHLOROPHENOL ROTEHONE TETRAETHYL LEAD TETPAMETHYL LEAD TEIRAMETHYLTHIURAM DISULFIDE NAPHTHA BARIUM PETKOIEUM SULFONATE EXPOSURE FACTOR 2 2 2 18 16 17 17 16 16 15 14 14 14 2 4 EXPOSURE INDEX .035 .035 .035 .321 .321 .303 .303 .285 .285 .267 .250 .250 .250 .035 .071 .017 .017 .017 .017 .017 .017 .017 .017 .017 .017 .017 .053 .053 .017 .017 .017 .017 .017 .017 .017 .017 .017 .089 .071 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 10 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 07 03 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 03 03 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 01 01 WEIGHTED INDEX .357 .357 .357 .321 .321 .303 .303 .285 .285 .267 .250 .250 .250 .249 .214 .178 .178 .178 .178 .178 .178 .178 .178 .178 .178 .178 .160 .160 .124 .124 .124 .124 .124 . 124 .124 .124 .124 .089 .071 100 SUBSTAHCES FOR SIC 2879 OTHER TOTALS: 761 13.530 70.905 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 307^1ISC. PLASTICS PRODUCTS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS ---NOHS SURVEYED--- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 16.905 130 IHFOM CODE 2037 0527 9050 2460 2590 9090 1290 2135 2229 1018 5010 2532 •« 20*° 7 0290 H- 1720 en C0320 oo 9030 0874 2490 0490 0760 2000 0686 2540 1591 1010 9210 2170 1660 0570 1779 1913 0490 0490 C9020 5010 9010 0527 1591 0374 0230 NOHS t , , CODE '* M2829 80243 84055 73300 76720 17366 33640 80221 M1463 M0347 52138 82880 55460 90320 46970 09070 71055 24130 73790 83628 20380 M0600 81876 74990 83453 25145 94220 M0256 45930 17490 48535 32385 M2267 15570 90310 52131 M1806 M0647 42490 80517 07310 DESCRIPTION PETROLEUM SPIRITS CARBON SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED TOLUENE XYLENE GRAPHITE FORMALDEHYDE ETHYLENE, TETRAFLUORO-. POLYMER IRON OXIDE, RED ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BIS(2- OU, LUBE PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER PHENOL ASPHALT TRICHLOROETHANE. 1,1,1- BENZENE TALC DICHLOROETHANE, 1,2- ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO- CADMIUM SULFIDE CRESOL PARAFFIN CHROMIC ACID. LEAD(2O SALT 0 = TURPENTINE LEAD NAPHTHENATE DIOXANE, 1,4- WOODS PROPANOL, 1- METHANOL CARBON TETRACHLORIDE MICA ETHYLEHE GLYCOL C.I. 77196-PIGMENT ORANGE 20 CADMIUM ASBESTOS OIL, CUTTING SILICA FLOUR C.I. 77266-PIGMENT BLACK 7 LEAD SODIUM BORATE ANTIMONY EXPOSURE FACTOR 3.719 2.001 2,353 2,255 2,064 2,019 ,273 ,785 ,775 ,227 .209 ,623 ,087 ,056 ,484 .006 1.419 979 1,394 872 811 784 763 1,070 750 723 723 700 965 671 952 663 658 650 644 639 910 613 628 868 603 EXPOSURE INDEX .219 .118 .139 .133 .122 .119 .075 .105 .105 .072 .071 .096 .064 .062 .087 .059 .083 .057 .082 .051 .047 .046 .045 .063 .044 .042 .042 .041 .057 .039 .056 .039 .038 .038 .038 .037 .053 .037 .037 .051 .035 HAZARD UEIGHT 10 10 07 07 07 07 10 07 07 10 10 07 10 10 07 10 07 10 07 10 10 10 10 07 10 10 10 10 07 10 07 10 10 10 10 10 07 10 10 07 10 WEIGHTED INDEX 2.199 1.183 .974 .933 .854 .836 .753 .739 .736 .725 .715 .672 .643 .624 .614 .595 .587 .579 .577 .515 .479 .463 .451 .443 .443 .427 .427 .414 .399 .396 .394 .392 .389 .384 .380 .377 .376 .374 .371 .359 .356 •> ^ IK *> » fe * • • ft % image: ------- >IC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 3079 MISC. PLASTICS PRODUCTS OCCUPATIONAL SAFFTY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS ---NOHS SURVEYED--- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 16,905 130 IHFOM CODE 0230 1060 1941 1190 2020 1060 0686 1520 1591 0220 1631 0490 1560 > 0160 I 2620 *- 1860 Ł 1591 0867 1520 0490 2037 0540 0933 0860 1520 0590 C0260 0830 1536 1620 2540 0490 0020 0871 1620 2611 0490 1591 0686 NOHS CODE A1433 31500 51090 32550 54790 M0238 N1499 40297 83062 06580 M1643 01507 40987 20265 M0626 50742 84546 24003 70131 83718 M0630 17370 81806 M4016 80990 46240 07555 21660 40430 44030 M1322 M2270 01568 24095 81664 77150 15630 42685 M0926 DESCRIPTION ANTIMONY SULFIDE ETHYL ALCOHOL NITROPROPANE, 2- ETHYLEHE OXIDE TETRACHLOROETHYLENE ALCOHOL CHROME GREEN IRON OXIDES LEAD SULFATE. TRIBASIC AHILINE MERCURY SULFIDE CADMIUM LITIIOPONE SELENIDE ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL ALUMINUM OXIDE ZIRCONIUM OXIDE NITRIC ACID LEAD SULFATE DICHLOROBENZENE. ORTHO- IRON OXIDE (FE304) CADMIUM SELENIDE NAPHTHA-SOLVENT CARBON DISULFIDE DIETHYL PHTHALATE PENTANONE. 4-HYDROXY-4-METHYL-. 2- IRON OXIDE. YELLOW METHOXYETHANOL, 2- ARSENIC OXIDES CYCLOHEXANONE ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL MANGANESE DIOXIDE TURPENTINE (GUM) C.I. 77199-PIGMENT ORANGE 20 ACETIC ACID DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE MANGANESE OXIDE ZINC CHLORIDE CADMIUM OXIDES LEAD OXIDES C.I. 77600-PIGMENT YELLOW 34 EXPOSURE FACTOR 585 1,934 569 509 728 1,677 501 696 488 687 463 460 4,558 1,454 610 416 416 413 591 413 378 378 1.249 1,211 504 490 340 129 336 455 454 317 428 2,918 413 272 270 266 260 1 EXPOSURE INDEX .034 .114 .033 .030 .043 .099 .029 .041 .028 .040 .027 .027 .269 .086 .036 .024 .024 .024 .034 .024 .022 .022 .073 .071 .029 .028 .020 .066 .019 .026 .026 .018 .025 .172 .024 .016 .015 .015 .015 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 03 10 10 07 03 10 07 10 07 10 10 01 03 07 10 10 10 07 10 10 10 03 03 07 07 10 03 10 07 07 10 07 01 07 10 10 10 10 WEIGHTED INDEX .346 .343 .336 .301 .301 .297 .296 .288 .288 .284 .273 .272 .269 .258 .252 .246 .246 .244 .244 .244 .223 .223 .221 .214 .208 .202 .201 .200 .198 .188 .187 .187 .177 .172 . 171 . 160 . 159 . 157 .153 419 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3079 OTHER TOTALS: 138,212 8.004 42.647 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 3229 PRESSED AND BLOWN GLASS, NEC. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS — NOHS SURVEYED--- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS > 1 I-1 /T\ Ut o IHFOM CODE 1750 2532 0230 2037 0230 1591 2620 2229 0335 1300 9030 9050 0575 0160 0686 1774 1520 0040 2280 0931 NOHS CODE 80105 82880 A1433 M2S29 07310 42490 M0626 M1463 11220 33245 71055 84055 17683 20265 81876 47700 80990 02820 70130 26335 DESCRIPTION METHYL ETHYL KETONE PEROXIDE PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER ANTIMONY SULFIDE PETROLEUM SPIRITS ANTIMONY LEAD ZIRCONIUM OXIDE IRON OXIDE, RED BENZOYL PEROXIDE FIBERGLASS TALC SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED CELLULOSE ALUMINUM OXIDE CHROMIC ACID, LEADC2+) SALT (1:1) METHYL METHACRYLATE IRON OXIDE. YELLOW ACETONE STYRENE DIMETHYLANILINE. N.N- EXPOSURE FACTOR 16 16 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 16 5 1 1 1 6 6 5 EXPOSURE INDEX 1.777 1.777 .555 .555 .555 .555 .555 .555 .555 .555 .555 .555 1.777 .555 .111 .111 .111 .666 .666 .555 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 07 10 10 10 10 07 07 07 07 07 07 01 03 10 07 07 01 01 01 WEIGHTED INDEX 17.777 12.444 5.555 5.555 5.555 5.555 3.888 3.888 3.888 3.888 3.888 3.888 1.777 1.666 1.111 .777 .777 .666 .666 .555 20 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3229 OTHER TOTALS' 123 13.656 83.764 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS ilC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION J312 BLAST FURNACES AND STEEL MILLS DESCRIPTION NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 53,724 19 IHFOM CODE 1842 0490 1520 2537 5010 9050 2229 9090 2037 1591 0700 2490 2611 > 5010 ' 1520 Ł 1520 M 0230 0686 2532 0374 1520 2590 1591 0230 1591 9030 0290 2620 9010 1720 2460 C9020 1591 0874 0570 0160 0695 0760 0560 1660 CO J20 NOHS CODE 50495 15630 40297 A1003 52138 84055 M1463 17366 M2829 83453 90620 73790 77150 52131 80990 70131 07310 M0063 82880 80517 M0130 76720 42490 A1433 91160 71055 90320 M0626 67915 46970 73300 90310 42685 24130 17490 20265 19767 203BO 17460 45930 09070 NICKEL OXIDES CADMIUM OXIDES IRON OXIDES TUNGSTEN OXIDES OIL. LUBE SILICA. AMORPHOUS FUSED IRON OXIDE. RED GRAPHITE PETROLEUM SPIRITS LEAD NAPHTHENATE COAL TAR PITCH VOLATILES ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO- ZINC CHLORIDE OIL. CUTTING IRON OXIDE. YELLOW IRON OXIDE (FE304) ANTIMONY INORGANIC CHROMATES PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER SODIUM BORATE FERROUS OXIDE XYLENE LEAD ANTIMONY SULFIDE INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS TALC ASPHALT ZIRCONIUM OXIDE SAND TRICHLOROETHANE, 1,1,1- TOLUENE ASBESTOS LEAD OXIDES DICHLOROETHANE. 1,2- CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ALUMINUM OXIDE COAL CRESOL CARBON MONOXIDE MF1HAHOL BLtlZENE EXPOSURE FACTOR 18.814 18,790 22,791 18.688 9,704 13.351 12.503 11.778 7,926 6,988 5.730 7.870 4.993 4.957 925 462 437 358 151 087 027 5,913 4. 121 4.077 3.936 5,060 3.334 4.162 4,141 4,078 4,055 2.682 2.657 2,525 ,484 ,076 ,440 ,392 ,390 ,366 2,279 EXPOSURE INDEX .350 .349 .424 .347 .180 .248 .232 .219 .147 .130 .106 .146 .092 .092 .128 .120 .082 .081 .114 .113 .112 .110 .076 .075 .073 .094 .062 .077 .077 .075 .075 .049 .049 .046 .046 . 150 .064 .04f» .063 .062 .042 HAZARD HEIGHT 10 10 07 07 10 07 07 07 10 10 10 07 10 10 07 07 10 10 07 07 07 07 10 10 10 07 10 07 07 07 07 10 10 10 10 03 07 10 07 07 10 WEIGHTED INDEX 3.501 3.497 2.969 2.434 .806 .739 .629 .534 .475 .300 .066 .025 .929 .922 .902 .841 .825 .811 .801 .793 .785 .770 .767 .758 .732 .659 .620 .542 .539 .531 .528 .499 .494 .469 .462 .450 .448 .445 .441 .438 424 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOUS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION ---NOHS SURVEYED- — EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 3312 BLAST FURNACES AND STEEL MILLS DESCRIPTION 53.724 19 IHFOM CODE 2020 0527 2080 1913 0170 1631 0867 0360 2420 0220 2170 0540 2037 > 0686 1 1030 M 1060 m 0926 10 1620 1620 1790 2540 2570 0686 1430 9210 2040 2310 1591 1060 C0260 1591 1591 1340 1018 1536 2000 0686 1620 0577 NOHS FCODE 54790 80243 57740 32385 05250 45315 24003 11855 72085 06580 M0256 17370 M0630 80064 04980 M0238 27615 44000 44035 80056 74990 AI010 81876 38580 94220 55460 70870 M0125 31500 07555 84546 M0126 90880 M0347 40430 M0600 M0900 44025 17695 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE CARBON PHOSPHINE ETHYLENE 6LYCOL AtinOMIA MERCURY OXIDES DICHLOROBENZENE. ORTHO- BERYLLIUM OXIDES THALLIUM OXIDES ANILINE PROPANOL, 1- CARBON DISULFIDE NAPHTHA-SOLVENT POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI) ETHANOLAMINE ALCOHOL DIPHENYLAMINE MANGANESE MANGANESE OXIDES MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE TURPENTINE VANADIUM OXIDES CHROMIC ACID. LEADC2+) SALT (1=1) HYDROGEN CHLORIDE WOODS PHENOL SULFURIC ACID LEAD MONOXIDE ETHYL ALCOHOL ARSENIC OXIDES LEAD SULFATE LEAD TETROXIDE GASOLINE-LEADED ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE. BIS<2- ISOOUTYL ALCOHOL PARAFFIN CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04), ZINC SALT (1=1) INORGANIC MANGANESE COMPOUNDS CEMENT-PORTLAND 388 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3312' OTHER TOTALS: EXPOSURE FACTOR 3.201 2.194 2.168 2.077 2.791 1.886 1,883 1.857 1,849 2.462 1.706 1,680 1.671 1,575 5.084 4.983 4.795 2.044 2,024 4,706 2.002 1,857 1,266 1,668 1,136 1.127 1.541 1,067 3,412 1,016 1.016 995 966 955 930 922 920 1.314 1,288 516,055 EXPOSURE INDEX .059 .040 .040 .038 .051 .035 .035 .034 .034 .045 .031 .031 .031 .029 .094 .092 .089 .038 .037 .087 .037 .034 .023 .031 .021 .020 .028 .019 .063 .018 .018 .018 .017 .017 .017 .017 .017 .024 .023 9.433 HAZARD WEIGHT 07 10 10 10 07 10 10 10 10 07 10 10 10 10 03 03 03 07 07 03 07 07 10 07 10 10 07 10 03 .10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 07 , WEIGHTE INDEX .417 .408 .403 .386 .363 .351 .350 .345 .344 .320 .317 .312 .311 .293 .283 .278 .267 .266 .263 .262 .260 .241 .235 .2 .2 .2 .2 .1 .1 B a B f . . w „ .1 60.0 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 3441 OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS HOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS FABRICATED STRUCTURAL METAL DESCRIPTION 4,557 36 IHFOM CODE 0490 1842 2080 1631 1591 0360 2420 1520 2537 0560 9050 2570 1620 > 1790 I 5010 tr 5010 Ł 2037 2229 1591 0230 0230 1980 0530 2620 0730 2440 2587 2590 1591 0686 2460 0290 C0260 1591 2532 0160 0686 1720 2490 1520 1520 NOHS CODE 15630 50495 57740 45315 42685 11855 72085 40297 A1003 17460 84055 A1010 44035 48628 52131 52138 M2829 111463 42490 07310 A1433 81651 17367 M0626 20170 A1211 76618 76720 83453 81876 73300 90320 07555 84546 82880 20265 80064 46970 7J790 80990 70131 CADMIUM OXIDES NICKEL OXIDES PHOSPHINE MERCURY OXIDES LEAD OXIDES BERYLLIUM OXIDES THALLIUM OXIDES IRON OXIDES TUNGSTEN OXIDES CARBON MONOXIDE SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED VAHADIUM OXIDES MANGANESE OXIDES MOLYBDENUM OXIDES OIL, CUTTING OIL. LUBE PETROLEUM SPIRITS IRON OXIDE, RED LEAD ANTIMONY ANTIMONY SULFIDE OZONE CARBON DIOXIDE ZIRCONIUM OXIDE COPPER OXIDES TITANIUM. OXIDES OF WELDING RODS XYLEME LEAD HAPHTHENATE CHROMIC ACID, LEAD<2»> SALT (1:1) TOLUENE ASPHALT ARSENIC OXIDES LEAD SULFATE PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER ALUMINUM OXIDE POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI) TRICHIOROETHANE. 1.1,1- ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO- IROH OXIDt, YELLOW IRON OXIDE (FE304) EXPOSURE FACTOR 5,135 5.135 4,205 3,784 3,773 3,769 3,769 5,128 4,889 4,205 4,149 3,769 3.769 3,769 768 758 692 974 596 585 583 4,220 4.209 583 3.775 3.769 3,769 454 279 273 364 232 205 205 292 666 200 279 275 259 240 EXPOSURE INDEX 1 1 1 1 .126 .126 .922 .830 .827 .827 .827 .125 .072 .922 .910 .827 .827 .827 .168 .166 .151 .213 .130 .128 .127 .926 .923 .127 .828 .827 .827 .099 .061 .059 .079 .050 .044 .044 .064 .146 .043 .061 .060 .056 . 002 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 07 07 07 07 07 03 10 10 10 07 10 10 10 01 01 07 01 01 01 07 10 10 07 10 10 10 07 03 10 07 07 07 07 WEIGHTED INDEX • 11 11 9 a 8 8 8 7 7 6 6 5 5 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .268 .268 .227 » .303 .279 .270 .270 • .877 .509 .459 .373 .789 .789 .481 .685 » .663 .518 .496 .307 .283 .279 .926 .923 » .895 .828 .827 .827 • .697 .612 .599 .559 .509 .449 .449 .448 .438 .438 .428 .422 . 397 . 368 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 3441 FABRICATED STRUCTURAL METAL OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 4,557 36 IHFOM CODE 1520 C9020 0686 2611 2090 1060 1430 0527 0170 1970 0760 1280 2000 2020 0374 1591 1913 9030 1591 9090 0874 0230 0926 0570 9050 1060 1591 9085 2540 0933 2610 1030 0686 1340 0686 2540 1591 0310 1779 NOHS CODE M0130 90310 M0900 77150 81650 M0238 38580 80243 05250 52480 20380 81945 M0600 54790 80517 M0126 32385 71055 84743 17366 24130 M1109 27615 17490 80542 31500 M1693 68768 74990 81806 77190 04980 68900 90880 M0063 M1322 91160 M2929 48535 DESCRIPTION FERROUS OXIDE ASBESTOS CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04), ZINC SALT (1:1) ZINC CHLORIDE PHOSPHORUS ALCOHOL HYDROGEN CHLORIDE CARBON AMMONIA OXALIC ACID CRESOL POTASSIUM BIFLUORIDE PARAFFIN TETRACHLOROETHYLENE SODIUM BORATE LEAD TETROXIDE ETHYLENE GLYCOL TALC LEAD SILICOCHROMATE GRAPHITE DICHLOROETHANE, 1.2- ANTIMONY DITHIOCARBAMATE DIPHENYLAMINE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE SILICA, FUMED ETHYL ALCOHOL LEAD SOAP SOAPSTONE TURPENTINE DIETHYL PHTHALATE ZIHC OXIDE ETHANOLAMINE SODIUM CHROMATE(VI) GASOLINE-LEADED INORGANIC CHROMATES TURPENTINE (GUM) INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE MICA 265 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3441 EXPOSURE FACTOR 235 163 157 154 153 428 170 115 159 108 105 94 83 112 108 71 70 100 69 98 68 66 218 60 85 196 53 75 69 157 463 153 46 44 43 57 40 396 49 EXPOSURE INDEX .051 .035 .034 .033 .033 .093 .037 .025 .034 .023 .023 .020 .018 .024 .023 .015 .015 .021 .015 .021 .014 .014 .047 .013 .018 .043 .011 .016 .015 .034 .101 .033 .010 .009 .009 .012 .008 .086 .010 HAZARD HEIGHT 07 10 10 10 10 03 07 10 07 10 10 10 10 07 07 10 10 07 10 07 10 10 03 10 07 03 10 07 07 03 01 03 10 10 10 07 10 01 07 WEIGHTED INDEX .360 .357 .344 .337 .335 .281 .261 .252 .244 .236 .230 .206 .182 .172 .165 .155 .153 .153 .151 .150 .149 .144 .143 .131 .130 .129 .116 .115 .105 .103 .101 .100 .100 .096 .094 .087 .087 .086 .075 OTHER TOTALS: 99,026 21.597 139.065 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 3444 SHEET METAL WORK NOHS EMPLOYMENT 2,837 SURVEYED --- FIRMS ui IHFOM CODE 0490 1842 2080 1520 2537 1591 1631 0360 2420 0560 9050 2570 1620 0230 1591 0230 1018 5010 2037 0290 2229 2620 1790 2460 5010 C9020 2490 1591 1720 9210 0160 0530 1980 2590 2532 9090 1591 1591 0686 0686 0730 NOHS CODE 15630 50495 57740 40297 AI003 42685 45315 11855 72085 17460 84055 A1010 44035 07310 42490 A1433 M0347 52138 M2829 90320 M1463 M0626 48628 73300 52131 90310 73790 83453 46970 94220 20265 17367 81651 76720 82880 17366 M0125 M0126 80064 81876 20170 DESCRIPTION CADMIUM OXIDES NICKEL OXIDES PHOSPHINE IRON OXIDES TUNGSTEN OXIDES LEAD OXIDES MERCURY OXIDES BERYLLIUM OXIDES THALLIUM OXIDES CARBON MONOXIDE SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED VANADIUM OXIDES MANGANESE OXIDES ANTIMONY LEAD ANTIMONY SULFIDE ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BIS(2- OIL. LUBE PETROLEUM SPIRITS ASPHALT IRON OXIDE, RED ZIRCONIUM OXIDE MOLYBDENUM OXIDES TOLUENE OIL, CUTTING ASBESTOS ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO- LEAD NAPHTHENATE TRICHLOROETHANE, MOODS ALUMINUM OXIDE CARBON DIOXIDE OZONE XYLEHE PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER GRAPHITE LEAD MONOXIDE LEAD TETROXIDE POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI) CHROMIC ACID, LEAD(2») SALT (1=1 COPPER OXIDES 1 1,1.1- EXPOSURE FACTOR 2,206 2,206 1,597 2,185 2,128 1,286 ,200 ,193 ,193 ,618 ,519 ,193 ,193 536 527 524 475 432 418 410 562 524 .193 435 245 206 293 200 280 169 560 ,615 ,597 224 217 216 132 130 124 124 , 196 1 1 EXPOSURE INDEX .777 .777 .562 .770 .750 .453 .422 .420 .420 .570 .535 .420 .420 .188 .185 .184 .167 .152 .147 .144 .198 .184 .420 .153 .086 .072 .103 .070 .098 .059 .197 .569 .562 .078 .076 .076 .046 .045 .043 .043 .421 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 10 07 07 10 10 10 10 07 07 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 07 03 07 10 10 07 10 07 10 03 01 01 07 07 07 10 10 10 10 01 7.775 7.775 5.629 5.391 5.250 4.532 4.229 4.205 4.205 3.992 3.747 2.943 2.943 .889 .857 .847 .674 .522 .473 .445 .386 1.292 1.261 1.073 .863 .726 .722 .704 .690 .595 .592 .569 .562 .552 .535 .532 .465 .458 .437 .437 .421 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 3444 SHEET METAL WORK OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS ---NOHS SURVEYED—- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS > 1 I t-1 en a\ IHFOM CODE 2440 2587 C0260 1591 2611 0527 1591 1591 1591 1591 2090 1430 9050 2000 COJ20 0760 1660 2432 2432 2432 0933 0874 2020 0374 0570 1842 1060 0505 0926 1030 1060 0867 1170 0686 1591 9030 0520 1536 2540 NOHS CODE A1211 76618 07555 84546 77150 80243 81000 81677 84544 M0751 81650 38580 80542 M0600 09070 20380 45930 73253 M0877 82157 81806 24130 54790 80517 17490 84269 M0238 15705 27615 04980 31500 24003 46935 M0900 M1693 71055 15755 40430 74990 2,817 3ft DESCRIPTION TITANIUM, OXIDES OF MELDING RODS ARSENIC OXIDES LEAD SULFATE ZINC CHLORIDE CARBON LEAD SUBOXIDE LEAD TRIOXIOE LEAD DIOXIDE LEADED ZINC OXIDE PHOSPHORUS HYDROGEN CHLORIDE SILICA, FUMED PARAFFIN BENZENE CRESOL METHANOL TIN OXIDES STANNIC OXIDE STANNOUS OXIDE DIETHYL PHTHALATE DICHLOROETHANE, 1,2- TETRACHLOROETHYLENE SODIUM BORATE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE NICKEL OXIDE ALCOHOL CALCIUM CARBONATE DIPHENYLAMINE ETHANOLAMINE ETHYL ALCOHOL DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHQ- ETHYLENE GLYCOL MONOMETHYL ETHER ACETATE CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04), ZINC SALT UU) LEAD SOAP TALC CALCIUM OXIDE ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL TURPENTINE 226 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3444 EXPOSURE FACTOR 1.193 1.193 118 118 116 113 111 111 111 100 100 141 132 86 81 79 113 113 111 111 245 70 96 92 61 56 177 516 172 170 165 49 156 44 44 63 437 43 60 EXPOSURE INDEX .420 .420 .041 .041 .040 .039 .039 .039 .039 .035 .035 .049 .046 .030 .028 .027 .039 .039 .039 .039 .086 .024 .033 .032 .021 .019 .•62 .181 .060 .059 .058 .017 .054 .015 .015 .022 .154 .015 .021 HAZARD HEIGHT 01 01 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 07 10 10 10 07 07 07 07 03 10 07 07 10 10 03 01 03 03 03 10 03 10 10 07 01 10 07 WEIGHTED INDEX .420 .420 .415 .415 .408 .398 .391 .391 .391 .352 .352 .347 .325 .303 .285 .278 .278 .278 .273 .273 .259 .246 .236 .227 .21! .197 .181 .181 .181 .w .174 .172 .16' .15! .15! .15! .15< .15] .141 OTHER TOTALS> 46,895 16.423 105.21] image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 3469 METAL STAMPINGS. NEC. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AMD HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AMD ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 4.871 40 IHFOM CODE 5010 5010 9050 0490 1842 1591 0230 0230 1591 2037 1520 2537 2532 > 2490 I 2229 ^ 1060 ^ 2620 2590 2000 0374 2080 1030 1779* 1591 0560 0360 1631 2420 0170 0160 2540 1720 2611 9090 0686 2570 1620 0686 0926 1060 0220 NOHS CODE 52131 52138 84055 15630 50495 42490 07310 A1433 83453 M2829 40297 A1003 82880 73790 M1463 M0238 M0626 76720 M0600 80517 57740 04980 48535 42685 17460 11855 45315 72085 05250 20265 74990 46970 77150 17366 M0900 A1010 44035 80064 27615 3)500 06580 DESCRIPTION OIL. CUTTING OIL, LUBE SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED CADMIUM OXIDES NICKEL OXIDES LEAD ANTIMONY ANTIMONY SULFIDE LEAD NAPHTHENATE PETROLEUM SPIRITS IRON OXIDES TUNGSTEN OXIDES PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO- IRON OXIDE, RED ALCOHOL ZIRCONIUM OXIDE XYLENE PARAFFIN SODIUM BORATE PHOSPHINE ETHANOLAMINE MICA LEAD OXIDES CARBON MONOXIDE BERYLLIUM OXIDES MEkcurtt OXIDES THALLIUM OXIDES AMMONIA ALUMINUM OXIDE TURPENTINE TRICHLOROETHANE, ZINC CHLORIDE GRAPHITE CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04), ZINC SALT (1:1) VANADIUM OXIDES MANGANESE OXIDES POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI) DIPHENYLAMINE ETHYL ALCOHOL ANILINE 1.1,1- EXPOSURE FACTOR 1,623 1,254 1,489 847 837 717 677 675 660 606 830 801 795 786 778 1,777 713 675 469 591 405 1,347 454 299 405 270 270 270 JiO 816 349 348 232 286 200 270 270 185 600 570 227 EXPOSURE INDEX .333 .257 .305 .173 .171 .147 .138 .138 .135 .124 .170 .164 .163 .161 .159 .364 .146 .138 .096 .121 .083 .276 .093 .061 .083 .055 .055 .055 .073 .167 .071 .071 .047 .058 .041 .055 .055 .037 .123 .117 .046 HAZARD HEIGHTED WEIGHT INDEX 10 3.331 10 2.574 07 2.139 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 07 07 07 07 03 07 .738 .718 .471 .389 .385 .354 .244 .192 .151 .142 .129 .118 .094 .024 07 .970 10 .962 07 .849 10 .831 03 .829 07 .652 10 .613 07 .582 10 .554 10 .554 10 .554 07 .517 03 .502 07 .501 07 .500 in 474 07 1411 10 .410 07 .388 07 .388 10 .379 03 .369 03 .351 07 .326 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 3469 METAL STAMPINGS. NEC. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS - — NOHS SURVEYED--- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 4,671 40 IHFOM CODE 1591 0686 1520 2460 1290 9030 2020 0760 1660 1430 1797 0867 0527 > 1790 1 1790 t- 0874 Ł 1280 00 0570 0310 2432 2260 1591 C0320 9210 0505 1970 2170 0460 0686 2037 0540 2140 2310 9010 1591 0440 1591 1591 1591 NOHS CODE 91160 M0063 80990 73300 33640 71055 54790 20380 45930 38580 48910 24003 80243 48628 80056 24130 81945 17490 M2929 73253 69070 M1693 09070 94220 15705 52480 M0256 13850. 19360 M0630 17370 60440 70870 M1806 81000 143BO M0125 M0126 81677 DESCRIPTION INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS INORGANIC CHROMATES IRON OXIDE. YELLOW TOLUENE FORMALDEHYDE TALC TETRACHLOROETHYLENE CRESOL METHANOL HYDROGEN CHLORIDE MORPHOLINE DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHO- CARBON MOLYBDENUM OXIDES MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE DICHLOROETHANE. 1.2- POTASSIUM BIFLUORIDE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE TIN OXIDES SODIUM HYDROXIDE LEAD SOAP BENZENE WOODS CALCIUM CARBONATE OXALIC ACID PROPANOL, 1- BUTANOL CHROMIC ACID NAPHTHA-SOLVENT CARBON DISULFIDE POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE SULFURIC ACID SILICA FLOUR LEAD SUBOXIDE BUTYL ACETATE LEAD MONOXIDE LEAD TETROXIDE LEAD TRIOXIDE 267 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3469 OTHER TOTALS: EXPOSURE FACTOR 147 140 186 171 117 161 148 99 141 137 299 89 84 272 257 76 76 73 687 96 645 62 62 60 595 56 54 536 54 53 53 511 72 70 46 449 44 44 42 40,191 EXPOSURE INDEX .030 .028 .038 .035 .024 .033 .030 .020 .028 .028 .061 .018 .017 .055 .052 .015 .015 .014 .141 .019 .132 .012 .012 .012 .122 .011 .011 .110 .011 .010 .010 .104 .014 .014 .009 .092 .009 .009 .008 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 07 07 10 07 07 10 07 07 03 10 10 03 03 10 10 10 01 07 01 10 10 10 01 10 10 01 10 10 10 01 07 07 10 01 10 10 10 WEIGHTED INDEX .301 .287 .267 .245 .240 .231 .212 .203 .202 .196 .184 .182 .172 .167 .158 .156 .156 .149 .141 .137 .132 .127 .127 .123 .122 .114 .110 .110 .110 .108 .108 .104 .103 .100 .094 .092 .090 .090 .086 8.132 49.346 image: ------- 1C INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 471 PLATING AND POLISHING OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS ---NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 771 IHFOM CODE 1860 0686 2310 1430 9050 2229 2037 2620 1520 1840 0160 2432 9010 2537 C9020 1840 1460 0790 0490 0374 1591 1840 0686 0170 0790 0020 2460 1591 1840 0790 0790 1842 1018 2240 0230 0230 2040 0290 2490 2590 2000 NOHS CODE 50742 19360 70870 38580 84055 M1463 M2829 M0626 40297 50510 20265 73253 Ml 8 06 80230 90310 81906 38550 68950 15630 80517 42490 81904 90570 05250 60400 01568 73300 M0751 50440 80720 M0052 50495 M0347 M0105 A1433 07310 55460 90320 73790 76720 F10600 DESCRIPTION NITRIC ACID CHROMIC ACID SULFURIC ACID HYDROGEN CHLORIDE SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED IRON OXIDE, RED PETROLEUM SPIRITS ZIRCONIUM OXIDE IRON OXIDES NICKEL SULFATE ALUMINUM OXIDE TIN OXIDES SILICA FLOUR TUNGSTEN CARBIDE ASBESTOS NICKEL ACETATE HYDROGEN FLUORIDE SODIUM CYANIDE CADMIUM OXIDES SODIUM BORATE LEAD NICKEL SALTS CHROMOUS SALTS AMMONIA POTASSIUM CYANIDE ACETIC ACID TOLUENE LEADED ZINC OXIDE NICKEL CHLORIDE ZIMC CYANIDE INORGANIC CYANIDES NICKEL OXIDES ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BISC2- INORGANIC SILVER COMPOUNDS ANTIMONY SULFIDE ANTIMONY PHEHOL ASPHALT ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO- XYIENE PARAFFIN EXPOSURE FACTOR 257 241 329 275 251 241 153 217 193 134 411 173 166 166 112 100 96 136 90 128 87 87 87 120 115 114 114 75 70 97 96 66 61 87 57 57 53 52 74 73 49 EXPOSURE INDEX .333 .312 .426 .356 .325 .312 .198 .281 .250 .173 .533 .224 .215 .215 .145 .129 .124 .176 .116 .166 .112 .112 .112 .155 .149 .147 .147 .097 .090 .125 .124 .085 .079 .112 .073 .073 .068 .067 .095 .094 .063 HAZARD WEIGHTED HEIGHT INDEX 10 3.333 10 3.125 07 2.987 07 2.496 07 2.278 07 2.188 10 07 07 10 03 07 07 07 10 10 10 07 10 07 10 10 10 07 07 07 07 .984 .970 .752 .738 .599 .570 .507 .507 .452 .297 .245 .234 .167 .162 .128 .128 .128 .089 .044 .035 .035 10 .972 10 .907 07 .880' 07 .871 10 .856 10 .791 07 .789 10 .739 10 .739 10 .607 10 .674 07 .671 07 .662 10 .635 image: ------- .1C INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION PLATING AND POLISHING OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX UITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS ---NOHS SURVEYED—- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 771 23 IHFOM CCDE 1536 1631 C0320 0570 0874 1842 0490 2537 0686 0760 1290 0790 0360 •h, 1591 T 2260 M 1720 -J 1660 o 2080 2420 2085 2611 0527 2170 1842 0560 0735 1620 0490 0490 0490 0490 0490 0490 0490 0490 2570 1060 1591 9090 NOHS CODE 40430 45315 09070 17490 24130 50420 82783 A1003 80064 20380 33640 81950 11855 42685 69070 46970 45930 57740 72085 58520 77150 80243 M0256 82846 17460 94040 44035 80247 81748 81749 83005 83628 83718 84157 84478 A1010 31500 M0125 17366 DESCRIPTION ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL MERCURY OXIDES BENZENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE DICHLOROETHANE, 1,2- NICKEL CADMIUM CYANIDE TUNGSTEN OXIDES POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI) CRESOL FORMALDEHYDE GOLD POTASSIUM CYANIDE BERYLLIUM OXIDES LEAD OXIDES SODIUM HYDROXIDE TRICHLOROETHANE. 1,1.1- METHAHOL PHOSPHIHE THALLIUM OXIDES PHOSPHORIC ACID ZINC CHLORIDE CARBON PROPAHOL. 1- NICKEL CYANIDE CARBON MONOXIDE COTTON MANGANESE OXIDES CADMIUM SULFATE CADMIUM IODIDE CADMIUM NITRATE CADMIUM TELLURIDE CADMIUM SULFIDE CADMIUM SELENIDE CADMIUM PHOSPHATE CADMIUM CHLORIDE VANADIUM OXIDES ETHYL ALCOHOL LEAD MONOXIDE GRAPHITE 257 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3471 OTHER TOTALS: EXPOSURE FACTOR 49 46 45 45 45 45 45 63 43 42 42 57 38 38 376 51 50 35 35 332 32 32 30 30 41 41 38 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 35 75 21 30 11.089 EXPOSURE INDEX .063 .059 .058 .058 .058 .058 .058 .081 .055 .054 .054 .073 .049 .049 .487 .066 .064 .045 .045 .430 .041 .041 .038 .038 .053 .053 .049 .032 .032 .032 .032 .032 .032 .032 .032 .045 .097 .027 .038 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 10 10 10 07 10 10 01 07 07 10 10 01 10 10 10 10 07 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 03 10 07 WEIGHTED INDEX .635 .596 .583 .583 .583 .583 .583 .571 .557 .544 .544 .517 .492 .492 .487 .463 .453 .453 .453 .430 .415 .415 .389 .389 .372 .372 .345 .324 .324 .324 .324 .324 .324 .324 .324 .317 .291 .272 .272 14.244 86.252 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOUS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION METAL COATING AND ALLIED SERVICES DESCRIPTION NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 252 10 IHFOM CODE I860 1460 0686 1840 0686 1430 2310 0790 2240 C0320 2460 2037 0874 0160 2590 0790 1720 1591 1591 0527 1536 9050 0570 1060 0686 0645 0860 1631 1018 2000 2490 1660 1591 1591 1840 0686 1840 C0260 C25BO 1591 0686 NOHS CODE 50742 38550 19360 81904 90570 38580 70870 M0052 M0105 09070 73300 M2829 24130 20265 76720 68950 46970 M0125 M0126 80243 40430 84055 17490 31500 M0900 29010 M4016 45315 MO 34 7 M0600 73790 45930 A1297 M0751 M0778 M1499 M1782 07545 76445 80252 81876 NITRIC ACID ' HYDROGEN FLUORIDE CHROMIC ACID NICKEL SALTS CHROMOUS SALTS HYDROGEN CHLORIDE SULFURIC ACID INORGANIC CYANIDES INORGANIC SILVER COMPOUNDS BENZENE TOLUENE PETROLEUM SPIRITS DICHLOROETHANE, 1.2- ALUillNUn OXIDE XYLENE SODIUM CYANIDE TRICHLOROETHANE, 1,1,1- LEAD MONOXIDE LEAD TETROXIDE CARBON ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ETHYL ALCOHOL CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04), ZINC SALT (1:1) EPICHLOROHYDRIN PENTANONE, 4-HYDROXY-4-METHYL-, MERCURY OXIDES EIHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BIS(2- PARAFFIN ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO- METHANOL LEAD CARBONATE, BASIC LEADED ZINC OXIDE NICKEL TITANATE CHROME GREEN NICKEL-AN1IMONY TITANATES ARSENIC VINYL CHLORIDE LEAD CARDONATE CHROMIC ACID. LEAD(2») SALT (I'l) 2- EXPOSURE FACTOR 331 231 229 225 225 230 230 225 225 150 159 101 82 252 105 86 85 53 53 53 51 72 46 151 45 45 149 44 43 43 60 59 41 41 41 41 4 4 4 4 4 EXPOSURE INDEX 1.313 .916 .908 .892 .892 .912 .912 .892 .892 .595 .630 .400 .325 1.000 .416 .341 .337 .210 .210 .210 .202 .285 .182 .599 .178 .178 .591 .174 .170 .170 .238 .234 .162 .162 .162 .162 .162 .162 . 162 .162 . 162 HAZARD WEIGHTED WEIGHT INDEX 10 13.134 10 .166 10 .087 10 .928 10 .928 07 .388 07 .388 07 .249 07 6.249 10 5.952 07 4.416 10 4.007 10 3.253 03 3.000 07 2.916 07 2.388 07 2.361 10 2.103 10 2.103 10 2.103 10 2.023 07 10 03 10 10 03 10 10 10 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 .999 .825 .797 .785 .785 .773 .746 .706 .706 .666 .638 .626 .626 .626 .626 .626 .626 .626 .636 .626 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY HEIGHTED INDEX UITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 3479 METAL COATING AND ALLIED SERVICES DESCRIPTION — -NOHS SURVEYED—- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 252 10 K> IHFOM CODE 9030 2229 2532 1010 1941 1520 2020 1060 1520 9050 0590 2085 2140 2260 2430 0515 5010 2682 0735 0040 1591 1840 1030 1040 2427 2135 9210 0830 2611 1591 1591 1591 1591 1610 1560 0460 0686 0435 0430 NOHS CODE 71055 H1463 82880 25145 51090 40297 54790 M0238 80990 M1532 46240 58520 60440 69070 M0120 15743 52138 80219 94040 02820 42685 50510 04980 31470 71900 80221 94220 21660 77150 81000 81677 83453 84544 80298 40987 13850 80064 29930 13980 TALC IRON OXIDE, RED PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER DIOXANE. 1.4- NITROPROPANE. 2- IRON OXIDES TETRACHLOROETHYLENE ALCOHOL IRON OXIDE. YELLOW SILICA GEL METHOXYETHANOL, 2- PHOSPHORIC ACID POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE SODIUM HYDROXIDE INORGANIC TIN COMPOUNDS CALCIUM HYDROXIDE OIL. LUBE TETRAETHYLTHIURAM DISULFIDE COTTON ACETONE LEAD OXIDES NICKEL SULFATE ETHANOLAMINE ETHYL ACETATE TETRAMETHYLTHIURAM DISULFIDE ETHYLEHE. TETRAFLUORO-. POLYMER WOODS CYCLOHEXANONE ZINC CHLORIDE LEAD SUBOXIDE LEAD TRIOXIDE LEAD NAPHTHENATE LEAD DIOXIDE MAGNESIUM OXIDE ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL BUTAIIOl POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI) ETHAHOl. 2-BUTOXY- BUTANOHE. 2- 165 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3479 EXPOSURE FACTOR 54 53 53 37 36 49 46 106 45 41 41 275 271 243 225 225 20 20 25 152 15 15 48 141 20 20 14 45 13 12 12 12 12 110 105 101 10 99 94 EXPOSURE INDEX .214 .210 .210 .146 .142 .194 .182 .420 .178 .162 .162 1.091 1.075 .964 .892 .892 .079 .079 .099 .603 .059 .059 .190 .559 .079 .079 .055 .178 .051 .047 .047 .047 .047 .436 .416 .400 .039 .392 .373 HAZARD HEIGHT 07 07 07 10 10 07 07 03 07 07 07 01 01 01 01 01 10 10 07 01 10 10 03 01 07 07 10 03 10 10 10 10 10 01 01 01 10 01 01 WEIGHTED INDEX .499 .472 .472 .468 .428 .361 .277 .261 .249 .138 .138 1.091 1.075 .964 .892 .892 .793 .793 .694 .603 .595 .595 .571 .559 .555 .555 .555 .535 .515 .476 .476 .476 .476 .436 .416 .400 .396 .392 .373 OTHER TOTALS' 8,734 34.548 188.304 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAPtIT AMD HEML in MuninisiKM•iun OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN HOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS >IC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 1499 FABRICATED METAL PRODUCTS. NEC. DESCRIPTION NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 3,486 28 IHFOM CODE 1842 0490 2037 1520 2000 2537 5010 9050 1591 0230 0230 2080 2229 1591 > 5010 ' UJ1 ^ 1591 tj 0360 2590 2620 2420 2490 0560 2532 1620 1842 2570 2460 0160 1591 1290 1460 1720 2040 0926 0170 C0320 0527 1790 1520 1060 NOHS CODE 50495 15630 M2829 40297 M0600 A1003 52138 84055 42490 07310 A1433 57740 M1463 42685 52131 45315 83453 11855 76720 M0626 72085 73790 17460 82880 44035 84269 A1010 73300 20265 M0751 33640 38550 46970 55460 27615 05250 09070 80243 48628 80990 110238 NICKEL OXIDES CADMIUM OXIDES PETROLEUM SPIRITS IRON OXIDES PARAFFIN TUNGSTEN OXIDES OIL, LUBE SILICA. AMORPHOUS FUSED LEAD ANTIMONY ANTIMONY SULFIDE PHOSPHINE IRON OXIDE. RED LEAD OXIDES OIL. CUTTING MERCURY OXIDES LEAD NAPHTHENATE BERYLLIUM OXIDES XYLENE ZIRCONIUM OXIDE THALLIUM OXIDES ETHYLEIIE. TRICHLORO- CARBON MONOXIDE PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER MANGANESE OXIDES NICKEL OXIDE VANADIUM OXIDES TOLUENE ALUMINUM OXIDE LEADED ZINC OXIDE FORMALDEHYDE HYDROGEN FLUORIDE TRICHLOROETHANE. 1.1.1- PHENOL D1PHENYLAMINE ANI10NIA BENZEHE CARBON MOLYBDENUM OXIDES IKON OXIDE, YEUOU ALCOHOL EXPOSURE FACTOR 1.429 1,386 1.323 1,532 1,042 1,408 936 1,269 720 702 696 608 849 559 535 521 519 518 732 719 474 677 652 627 518 357 474 419 783 209 203 189 249 168 507 217 149 148 474 196 453 EXPOSURE INDEX .409 .397 .379 .439 .298 .403 .268 .364 .206 .201 .199 .174 .243 .160 .153 .149 .148 .148 .209 .206 .135 .194 .187 .179 .148 .102 .135 .120 .224 .059 .058 .054 .071 .048 .145 .062 .042 .042 . 135 .056 .129 HAZARD WEIGHTED WEIGHT INDEX 10 4.099 10 3.975 10 3.795 07 3.076 10 2.989 07 2.827 10 2.685 07 2.548 10 2.065 10 2.013 10 10 07 10 10 10 10 10 07 07 10 07 07 07 07 10 .996 .744 .704 .603 .534 .494 .488 .485 .469 .443 .359 .359 .309 .259 .040 .024 07 .951 07 .841 03 .673 10 .599 10 .582 10 .542 07 .499 10 .481 03 416 07 .435 10 .427 10 .424 03 .407 07 .393 03 .389 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS ilC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION ---NOHS SURVEYED--- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 1499 FABRICATED METAL PRODUCTS. NEC. DESCRIPTION 3,486 28 IHFOM CODE 0290 1030 C9020 1060 1660 2432 0374 9090 1779 1018 1591 1591 1536 1520 > 0874 I 1520 "I 0686 ^ 0570 1591 1591 1591 1591 2611 9010 0686 0220 0310 1989 0530 0867 0686 2020 0760 1860 0730 1980 2170 2432 0490 NOHS CODE t 90320 04980 90310 31500 45930 73253 80517 17366 48535 M0347 M0125 M0126 40430 110130 24130 70131 80064 17490 M1693 81000 81677 84544 77150 67915 M0900 06580 M2929 54160 17367 24003 81876 54790 20380 50742 20170 81651 M0256 M0877 M1554 ASPHALT ETHANOLAMINE ASBESTOS ETHYL ALCOHOL METHANOL TIN OXIDES SODIUM BORATE GRAPHITE MICA ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BISC2- LEAD MONOXIDE LEAD TETROXIDE ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL FERROUS OXIDE DICHLOROETHANE, 1,2- IRON OXIDE (FE304) POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI) CARBON TETRACHLORIDE LEAD SOAP LEAD SUBOXIDE LEAD TRIOXIDE LEAD DIOXIDE ZINC CHLORIDE SAND CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04), ZINC SALT (1>1) ANILINE BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE PENTACHLOROPHENOL CARBON DIOXIDE DICHLOROBENZEHE. ORTHO- CHROMIC ACID, LEADC2O SALT (1 = 1) TETRACHLOROETHYLENE CRESOL NITRIC ACID COPPER OXIDES OZONE PROPANOL, 1- STANNIC OXIDE CADMIUM OXIDE 275 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3499 EXPOSURE FACTOR 133 428 115 362 152 150 150 148 147 100 94 94 94 132 92 130 91 88 84 83 83 83 80 110 72 103 714 100 694 68 68 96 65 62 607 608 60 83 58 EXPOSURE INDEX .038 .122 .032 .103 .043 .043 .043 .042 .042 .028 .026 .026 .026 .037 .026 .037 .026 .025 .024 .023 .023 .023 .022 .031 .020 .029 .204 .028 .199 .019 .019 .027 .018 .017 .174 .174 .017 .023 .016 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 03 10 03 07 07 07 07 07 10 10 10 10 07 10 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 10 07 01 07 01 10 10 07 10 10 01 01 10 07 .10 WEIGHTED INDEX .381 .368 .329 .311 .305 .301 .301 .297 .295 .286 .269 .269 .269 .265 .263 .261 .261 .252 .240 .238 .238 .238 .229 .220 .206 .206 .204 .200 .199 .195 .195 .192 .186 .177 .174 .174 .172 .166 .166 OTHER TOTALS: 42.506 12.057 78.937 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 3511 OCCUP*IIon«L aoreir wnu neMiin nuniniaiKM I tun OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS TURBINES AND TURBINE GENERATOR SETS DESCRIPTION CADMIUM OXIDES NICKEL OXIDES IRON OXIDES TUNGSTEN OXIDES MERCURY OXIDES LEAD OXIDES BERYLLIUM OXIDES THALLIUM OXIDES PHOSPHINE SILICA. AMORPHOUS FUSED VANADIUM OXIDES MANGANESE OXIDES CARBON MONOXIDE OIL, CUTTING ANTIMONY LEAD ANTIMONY SULFIDE OIL, LUBE MOLYBDENUM OXIDES IRON OXIDE, RED ZIRCONIUM OXIDE PETROLEUM SPIRITS GRAPHITE TRICHLOROETHANE, 1.1.1- ALUMINUM OXIDE XYLENE ALCOHOL ETHYLENE. TRICHLORO- TOLUENE CARBON ETHANOLAMINE NICKEL OXIDE PHENOL ETHYLENE GLYCOL INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS LEAD NAPHTHEMATE CARBON DIOXIDE COPPER OXIDES TITANIUM. OXIDES OF WELDING RODS PARAFFIN 5.234 IHFOM CODE 0490 1842 1520 2537 1631 1591 0360 2420 2080 9050 2570 1620 0560 > 5010 I 0230 •- 1591 ^ 0230 5010 1790 2229 2620 2037 9090 1720 0160 2590 1060 2490 2460 0527 1030 1842 2040 1913 1591 1591 0530 0730 2440 2587 2000 NOHS CODE 15630 50495 40297 A1003 45315 42685 11855 72085 57740 84055 A1010 44035 17460 52131 07310 42490 A1433 52138 48628 M1463 M0626 M2829 17366 46970 20265 76720 M0238 73790 73300 80243 04980 84269 55460 32385 91160 83453 17367 20170 A1211 76618 M0600 EXPOSURE FACTOR 2,915 2,909 2,762 2,755 ,722 ,700 ,656 ,656 .629 ,176 .656 .656 .629 803 599 581 579 505 1,656 666 655 394 558 453 908 355 815 346 338 235 778 230 192 187 181 180 1,693 1.662 1.656 1.656 163 EXPOSURE INDEX .556 .555 .527 .526 .329 .324 .316 .316 .311 .415 .316 .316 .311 .153 .114 .111 .110 .096 .316 .127 .125 .075 .106 .086 .173 .067 .155 .066 .064 .044 .148 .043 .036 .035 .034 .034 .323 .317 .316 .316 .031 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 07 07 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 03 07 07 10 07 07 03 07 03 07 07 10 03 10 10 10 10 10 01 01 01 01 10 WEIGHTED INDEX 5.569 5.557 3.693 3.684 3.290 3.247 3.163 3.163 3.112 2.910 2.214 2.214 2.178 1.534 1 .144 1.110 1.106 .964 .949 .890 .876 .752 .746 .605 .520 .474 .467 .462 .452 .448 .445 .439 .366 .357 .345 .343 .323 .317 .316 .316 .311 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 3511 TURBINES AND TURBINE GENERATOR SETS DESCRIPTION NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 5,234 5 IHFOM CODE 1980 9210 0290 1060 1591 1591 1660 0867 0570 0874 0170 2540 0686 _ 0760 •f 2532 M 9030 -J 0374 <* 2170 C0320 2611 0540 1280 2037 C9020 0686 2020 1430 0220 0686 1018 I860 0686 1280 C0260 1591 1591 0020 159.1 2432 NOHS CODE 81651 94220 90320 31500 M0125 M0126 45930 24003 17490 24130 05250 74990 81876 20380 82880 71055 80517 M0256 09070 77150 17370 81945 M0630 90310 M0900 54790 38580 06580 80064 M0347 50742 M0063 33595 07555 84546 M0751 01568 80252 73253 OZONE MOODS ASPHALT ETHYL ALCOHOL LEAD MONOXIDE LEAD TETROXIDE METHANOL DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHO- CARBON TETRACHLORIDE DICHLOROETHANE. 1.2- Ar.MONIA TURPENTINE CHROMIC ACID. LEAD(2*) SALT (1:1) CRESOL PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER TALC SODIUM BORATE PROPANOL, 1- BEHZENE ZINC CHLORIDE CARBON DISULFIDE POTASSIUM BIFLUORIDE NAPHTHA-SOLVENT ASBESTOS CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04). ZINC SALT (1:1) TETRACHLOROETHYLENE HYDROGEN CHLORIDE ANILINE POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI) ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BIS(2- NITRIC ACID INORGANIC CHROMATES FLUORSPAR ARSENIC OXIDES LEAD SULFATE LEADED ZIHC OXIDE ACETIC ACID LEAD CARBONATE TIN OXIDES 234 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3511 EXPOSURE FACTOR 1.629 160 159 508 147 147 209 144 142 142 200 197 137 136 191 189 174 121 120 120 116 116 112 111 109 154 146 131 84 83 83 82 77 71 71 69 98 69 96 EXPOSURE INDEX .311 .030 .030 .097 .028 .028 .039 .027 .027 .027 .038 .037 .026 .025 .036 .036 .033 .023 .022 .022 .022 .022 .021 .021 .020 .029 .027 .025 .016 .015 .015 .015 .014 .013 .013 .013 .018 .013 .018 HAZARD HEIGHT 01 10 10 03 10 10 07 10 10 10 07 07 10 10 07 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 10 07 WEIGHTED INDEX .311 .305 .303 .291 .280 .280 .279 .275 .271 .271 .267 .263 .261 .259 .255 .252 .232 .231 .229 .229 .221 .221 .213 .212 .208 .205 .195 .175 .160 .158 .158 .156 .147 .135 .135 .131 .131 .131 .128 OTHER TOTALS: 62.996 11.921 75.016 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND AHALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOUS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION SPECIAt DIES. TOOLS. JIGS < FIXTURES DESCRIPTION NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 1,808 37 IHFOrt CODE 5010 1591 0230 0230 9050 2229 2620 5010 2590 2460 0490 1842 2037 0160 1060 1060 1660 2490 1018 1520 0686 1030 2040 1720 2537 0020 C0320 1591 0374 1591 1591 2532 2080 0360 1631 2420 0570 0874 0760 0867 0220 NOHS CODE 52131 42490 07310 A1433 84055 M1463 M0626 52138 76720 73300 15630 50495 M2829 20265 31500 M0238 45930 73790 M6347 40297 81876 04980 55460 46970 A1003 01568 09070 83453 80517 42685 91160 82880 57740 11855 45315 72085 17490 24130 20380 24003 06580 OIL. CUTTING LEAD ANTIMONY ANTIMONY SULFIDE SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED IRON OXIDE, RED ZIRCONIUM OXIDE OIL. LUBE XYLEHE TOLUENE CADMIUM OXIDES NICKEL OXIDES PETROLEUM SPIRITS ALUMINUM OXIDE ETHYL ALCOHOL ALCOHOL METHANOL ETHYLENE. TRICHLORO- ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BIS<2- IRON OXIDES CHROMIC ACID, LEAD(2») SALT (1 = 1) ETHANOLAMINE PHENOL TRICHLOROETHANE, 1,1,1- TUNGSTEN OXIDES ACETIC ACID BENZENE LEAD MAPHTHENATE SODIUM BORATE LEAD OXIDES INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER PHOSPHINE BERYLLIUM OXIDES MERCURY OXIDES THALLIUM OXIDES CARBON TETRACHLORIDE DICIILOROETHAHE. 1.2- CRESOL DICHLOROBENZENE. ORTHO- ANILINE EXPOSURE FACTOR 823 567 534 532 728 577 536 353 395 350 242 240 224 742 676 641 267 267 183 257 172 569 165 234 202 191 133 117 161 111 99 139 95 92 92 92 85 85 84 81 115 EXPOSURE INDEX .455 .313 .295 .294 .402 .319 .296 .195 .218 .193 .133 .132 .123 .410 .373 .354 .147 .147 .101 .142 .095 .314 .091 .129 .111 .105 .073 .064 .089 .061 .054 .076 .052 .050 .050 .050 .047 .047 . 046 . 044 .063 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 10 10 07 07 07 10 07 07 10 10 10 03 03 03 07 07 10 07 10 03 10 07 07 07 10 10 07 10 10 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 WEIGHTED INDEX 4.551 3.136 2.953 2.942 2.818 2.233 2.075 .952 .529 .355 .338 .327 .238 .231 .121 .063 1.033 1.033 1.012 .995 .951 .944 .912 .905 .782 .739 .735 .647 .623 .613 .547 .538 .525 .508 .508 .508 .470 .470 .464 .448 .445 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS ---NOHS SURVEYED- — EMPLOYMENT FIRMS SPECIAL DIES, TOOLS, JIGS < FIXTURES DESCRIPTION 1.804 37 IHFOM CODE 0527 2540 1290 1520 2170 2037 0540 2020 0560 2570 1620 9090 ^ 2000 7 0460 M 0440 -J 0686 00 2611 1860 0170 1970 0720 0686 0686 1375 1767 1842 0926 1913 9210 1779 0820 2260 9030 0230 0522 2537 1790 1591 1591 NOHS CODE 80243 74990 33640 80990 M0256 M0630 17370 54790 17460 A1010 44035 17366 H0600 13850 14380 60370 77150 50742 05250 52480 19770 80064 M0900 83899 84547 84269 27615 32385 94220 48535 21560 69070 71055 07405 15800 74980 48628 M0751 M1693 CARBON TURPENTINE FORMALDEHYDE IRON OXIDE, YELLOW PROPANOL, 1- NAPHTHA-SOLVENT CARBON DISULFIDE TETRACHLOROETHYLENE CARBON MONOXIDE VANADIUM OXIDES MANGANESE OXIDES GRAPHITE PARAFFIN BUTANOL BUTYL ACETATE POTASSIUM CHROMATE ZINC CHLORIDE NITRIC ACID AMMONIA OXALIC ACID COBALT POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI) CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04), ZINC SALT (1:1) HEXAFLUOROACETONE METHYLCYCLOPENTADIENYL MANGANESE TRICARBONYL NICKEL OXIDE DIPHENYLAMINE ETHYLENE GLYCOL WOODS MICA CYCLOHEXANOL SODIUM HYDROXIDE TALC ANTIMONY TRICHLORIDE CAMPHOR TUNGSTEN MOLYBDENUM OXIDES LEADED ZINC OXIDE LEAD SOAP 254 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3544 OTHER TOTALS: EXPOSURE FACTOR 80 114 78 107 74 74 74 102 95 92 92 90 62 598 598 55 55 52 70 48 47 47 41 125 125 36 116 34 34 45 104 304 43 30 40 40 92 27 27 22.296 EXPOSURE INDEX .044 .063 .043 .059 .040 .040 .040 .056 .052 .050 .050 .049 .034 .330 .330 .030 .030 .028 .038 .026 .025 .025 .022 .069 .069 .019 .064 .018 .018 .024 .057 .168 .023 .016 .022 .022 .050 .014 .014 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 07 10 07 10 10 10 07 07 07 07 07 16 01 01 10 10 10 07 10 10 10 10 03 03 10 03 10 10 07 03 01 07 10 07 07 03 10 10 WEIGHTED INDEX .442 .441 .431 .414 .409 .409 .409 .394 .367 .356 .356 .348 .342 .330 .330 .304 .304 .287 .271 .265 .259 .259 .226 .207 .207 .199 .192 .188 .188 .174 .172 .168 .166 .165 .154 .154 .152 .149 .149 12.197 67.855 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION MACHINE TOOL ACCESSORIES OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AMD ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 1.010 12 IHFOM CODE 0230 0230 1591 5010 9050 2620 2229 5010 1591 0160 2490 0490 1842 2532 1520 2537 1030 1060 0926 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 2037 1720 0310 0686 2611 0686 1591 1060 0374 1560 2260 9010 9090 9030 I860 2090 NOHS CODE A1433 07310 42490 52131 84055 M0626 M1463 52138 83453 20265 73790 15630 50495 82980 40297 A1003 04980 M0238 27615 42685 M0125 M0126 81000 81677 84544 M2829 46970 M2929 M0063 77150 80064 91160 31500 80517 40987 69070 67915 17366 71055 50742 81650 DESCRIPTION ANTIMONY SULFIDE ANTIMONY LEAD OIL, CUTTING SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED ZIRCONIUM OXIDE IRON OXIDE, RED OIL, LUBE LEAD NAPHTHENATE ALUMINUM OXIDE ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO- CADMIUM OXIDES NICKEL OXIDES PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER IRON OXIDES TUNGSTEN OXIDES ETHANOLAMINE ALCOHOL DIPHENYLAMINE LEAD OXIDES LEAD MONOXIDE LEAD TETROXIDE LEAD SUBOXIDE LEAD TRIOXIDE LEAD DIOXIDE PETROLEUM SPIRITS TRICHLOROETHANE. 1.1.1- BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE INORGANIC CHROMATES ZIHC CHLORIDE POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI) INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS ETHYL ALCOHOL SODIUM BORATE I50PROPYL ALCOHOL SODIUM HYDROXIDE SAND GRAPHITE TALC NITRIC ACID PHOSPHORUS EXPOSURE FACTOR 825 825 825 639 864 826 826 445 291 832 314 211 209 290 210 209 279 278 271 55 45 45 45 45 45 40 51 271 19 19 19 19 63 27 149 146 20 19 19 13 13 EXPOSURE INDEX .816 .816 .816 .632 .855 .817 .817 .440 .288 .823 .310 .208 .206 .287 .207 .206 .276 .275 .268 .054 .044 .044 .044 .044 .044 .039 .050 .268 .018 .018 .018 .018 .062 .026 .147 .144 .019 .018 .018 .012 .012 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 10 10 07 07 07 10 10 03 07 10 10 07 07 07 03 03 03 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 01 10 10 10 10 03 07 01 01 07 07 07 10 10 WEIGHTED INDEX 8.168 8.168 8.168 6.326 5.988 5.724 5.724 4.405 2.881 2.471 2.176 2.089 2.069 2.009 1.455 1.448 .828 .825 .804 .544 .445 .445 .445 .445 .445 .396 .353 .268 .188 .188 .108 .188 .187 .187 .147 .144 .1)8 .131 .131 . 128 . 128 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY bY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS —-NOHS SURVEYED—- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 3545 MACHINE TOOL ACCESSORIES 1.010 12 IHFOM CODE C9020 2432 2432 2432 1660 0360 1631 2420 0020 1430 0686 0720 2570 ^ 1620 1 2590 M 0686 °? 0570 0 0670 1460 2080 1280 1790 2020 2310 2000 C0260 0686 1591 0290 0220 0460 0440 0560 1520 0933 2170 1913 1290 1790 NOHS CODE 90310 73253 M0877 82157 45930 11855 45315 72085 01568 38580 19360 84330 A1010 44035 76720 M0900 17490 18500 38550 57740 81945 80056 54790 70870 M0600 07555 81876 84546 90320 06580 13850 14380 17460 80990 81806 M0256 32385 33640 48628 DESCRIPTION ASBESTOS TIN OXIDES STANNIC OXIDE STANNOUS OXIDE METHANOL BERYLLIUM OXIDES MERCURY OXIDES THALLIUM OXIDES ACETIC ACID HYDROGEN CHLORIDE CHROMIC ACID COBALTOUS NITRATE VANADIUM OXIDES MANGANESE OXIDES XYLEHE CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04), ZINC SALT (1:1) CARBON TETRACHLORIDE CHLOROFORM HYDROGEN FLUORIDE PHOSPHINE POTASSIUM BIFLUORIDE MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE TETRACHLOROETHYLENE SULFURIC ACID PARAFFIN ARSENIC OXIDES CHROMIC ACID. LEAD(2*> SALT (1:1) LEAD SULFATE ASPHALT ANILINE BUTANOL BUTYL ACETATE CARBON MONOXIDE IRON OXIDE. YELLOU DIETHYL PHTHALATE PROPANOL. 1- EfHYLENE GLYCOL FORMALDEHYDE MOLYBDENUM OXIDES 154 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3545 EXPOSURE FACTOR 13 18 17 17 15 10 10 10 13 12 8 A 10 10 10 1 5 5 5 5 5 7 48 48 6 6 13 3 3 3 10 EXPOSURE INDEX .012 .017 .016 .016 .014 .009 .009 .009 .012 .011 .007 .007 .009 .009 .009 .005 .005 .005 .005 .005 .005 .018 .007 .007 .004 .004 .004 .004 .004 .006 .047 .047 .005 .005 .012 .002 .002 .002 .009 HAZARD HEIGHT 10 07 07 07 07 10 10 10 07 07 10 10 07 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 03 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 07 01 01 07 07 03 10 10 10 03 WEIGHTED INDEX ' .128 .124 .117 ' .117 .103 .099 .099 • .099 .090 .083 .079 .079 .069 .069 .069 • .059 .059 .059 .059 .059 .059 .056 .055 .055 .049 .049 .049 .049 .049 .048 .047 .047 .041 .041 .038 .029 .029 .029 .029 OTHER TOTALS: 11.401 11.156 80.710 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 3559 SPECIAL INDUSTRY MACHINERY. NEC. DESCRIPTION 427 > 1 t— • OO I-1 IHFOM CODE 1591 0230 0230 5010 9050 2229 2620 2037 5010 0490 1842 2611 1520 1591 2080 0374 2490 0160 1720 2537 9090 0686 1591 0360 0874 1631 2420 0290 C0260 1591 2532 1060 06S6 0560 1591 2000 2590 0220 2460 2570 1620 NOHS CODE 42490 A1433 07310 52131 84055 M1463 M0626 M2829 52138 15630 50495 77150 40297 4268$ 57740 80517 73790 20265 46970 A1003 17366 81876 91160 11855 24130 45315 72085 90320 07555 84546 82880 M0238 M0063 17460 83453 M0600 76720 06560 73JOO A1010 440J5 LEAD ANTIMONY SULFIDE ANTIMONY OIL, CUTTING SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED IRON OXIDE. RED ZIRCONIUM OXIDE PETROLEUM SPIRITS OIL. LUBE CADMIUM OXIDES NICKEL OXIDES ZINC CHLORIDE IROII OXIDES LEAD OXIDES PHOSPHINE SODIUM BORATE ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO- ALUMINUM OXIDE TRICHLOROETHAHE. 1,1.1- TUNGSTEN OXIDES GRAPHITE CHROMIC ACID, LEAD(2») SALT (1:1) INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS BERYLLIUM OXIDES DICHLOROETHANE, 1,2- MERCURY OXIDES THALLIUM OXIDES ASPHALT ARSENIC OXIDES LEAD SULFATE PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER ALCOHOL INORGANIC CHROMATES CARBON MONOXIDE LEAD NAPHTHEHATE PARAFFIN XYLENE ANILINE TOLUENF. VANADIUM OXIDES MANGANLSE OXIDES EXPOSURE FACTOR 128 127 127 118 149 135 130 76 60 57 57 57 65 45 44 60 59 137 57 55 53 36 36 34 34 34 34 34 33 33 47 107 31 44 28 27 37 36 35 3<. 34 EXPOSURE INDEX .299 .297 .297 .276 .348 .316 .304 .177 .140 .133 .133 .133 .152 .105 .103 .140 .138 .320 .133 .128 .124 .084 .084 .079 .079 .079 .079 .079 .077 .077 .110 .250 .072 .103 .065 .063 .086 .084 .081 .079 .079 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 10 10 07 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 07 10 10 07 07 03 07 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 03 10 07 10 10 07 07 07 07 07 WEIGHTED INDEX 2.997 2.974 2.974 2.763 2.442 2.213 2.131 .779 .405 .334 .334 .334 .065 .053 .030 .983 .967 .962 .934 .901 .868 .843 .843 .796 .796 .796 .796 .796 .772 .772 .770 .751 .725 .721 .655 .632 .606 .590 .573 .557 .557 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 3559 OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS SPECIAL INDUSTRY MACHINERY, NEC. DESCRIPTION 427 > 1 1— ' 00 K> IHFOM CODE 1030 9030 0686 C0320 0686 0170 1060 2540 1520 1010 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 9050 0570 1430 0867 2170 2037 0540 0760 1790 2432 1660 0527 2432 2432 12«0 2020 2240 9210 1790 1970 1842 I860 0926 NOHS CODE 04980 71055 M0900 09070 80064 05250 31500 74990 80990 25145 M1693 M0125 M0126 81000 81677 84544 M1532 17490 38580 24003 M0256 M0630 17370 20380 80056 73253 45930 80243 M0877 82157 81945 54790 68748 94220 48628 52480 84269 50742 27615 ETHANOLAMINE TALC CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04). ZINC SALT (1:1) BENZENE POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI) AMMONIA ETHYL ALCOHOL TURPENTINE IRON OXIDE, YELLOW DIOXANE, 1,4- LEAD SOAP LEAD MONOXIDE LEAD TETROXIDE LEAD SUBOXIDE LEAD TRIOXIDE LEAD DIOXIDE SILICA GEL CARBON TETRACHLORIDE HYDROGEN CHLORIDE DICHLOROBEHZENE, ORTHO- PROP ANOL. 1- NAPHTHA-SOLVENT CARBON DISULFIDE CRESOL MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE TIN OXIDES METHANOL CARBON STANNIC OXIDE STANNOUS OXIDE POTASSIUM BIFLUORIDE TETRACHLOROETHYLENE SILVER OXIDES WOODS MOLYBDENUM OXIDES OXALIC ACID NICKEL OXIDE NITRIC ACID DIPHENYLAMINE 211 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3559 EXPOSURE FACTOR 77 33 23 23 22 31 71 29 29 20 19 18 18 IB 18 18 25 17 23 16 15 15 15 15 50 21 20 13 18 18 12 17 16 11 34 10 10 9 28 EXPOSURE INDEX .180 .077 .053 .053 .051 .072 .166 .067 .067 .046 .044 .042 .042 .042 .042 .042 .058 .039 .053 .037 .035 .035 .035 .035 .117 .049 .046 .030 .042 .042 .028 .039 .037 .025 .079 .023 .023 .021 .065 HAZARD WEIGHT 03 07 10 10 10 07 03 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 10 07 10 10 10 10 10 03 07 07 10 07 07 10 07 07 10 03 10 10 10 03 WEIGHTED INDEX .540 .540 .538 .538 .515 .508 .498 .475 .475 .468 .444 .421 .421 .421 .421 .421 .409 .398 .377 .374 .351 .351 .351 .351 .351 .344 .327 .304 .295 .295 .281 .278 .262 .257 .238 .234 .234 .210 .196 OTHER TOTALS' 4.807 11.175 69.973 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 3561 PUMPS AND PUMPING EQUIPMENT OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 7,903 11 IHFOM CODE 9050 5010 2229 0867 1290 0868 1190 1369 2590 0374 2460 1520 1591 9090 > 2611 ' 0020 Ł 1»« w 2490 1591 0230 0490 1591 0686 1430 0230 2532 C9020 9010 5010 1310 9030 1340 1591 2037 0686 1190 2090 1460 2620 25J7 2360 NOHS CODE 84055 52138 M1463 24003 33640 24006 A1719 35960 76720 80517 73300 40297 83453 17366 77150 01568 50495 73790 42490 07310 15630 91160 M0063 38580 A1433 82880 90310 67915 52131 33720 71055 90880 42685 M2829 80064 32550 81650 58550 MD626 A1003 71640 DESCRIPTION SILICA. AMORPHOUS FUSED OIL, LUBE IRON OXIDE. RED DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHO- FORMALDEHYDE DICIILOROBENZENE. PARA- ETHYLEHE OXIDE CONDENSATE HEPTACHLOR XYLENE SODIUM BORATE TOLUENE IKON OXIDES LEAD NAPHTHENATE GRAPHITE ZINC CHLORIDE ACETIC ACID NICKEL OXIDES ETHYLENE. TRICHLORO- LEAD ANTIMONY CADMIUM OXIDES INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS INORGANIC CHROMATES HYDROGEN CHLORIDE ANTIMONY SULFIDE PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER ASBESTOS SAND OIL, CUTTING FORMIC ACID TALC GASOLINE-LEADED LEAD OXIDES PETROLEUM SPIRITS POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI) ETHYLEME OXIDE PHOSPHORUS HYDROGEN FLUORIDE ZIRCONIUM OXIDE IllNGSTEM OXIDES TEIRAETHYL LEAD EXPOSURE FACTOR 3,894 2,595 3,104 1,861 1,731 1,563 1,545 1,545 2.187 2,114 2,073 ,973 ,339 .866 ,269 .781 ,246 ,777 ,239 .237 ,235 ,186 ,174 ,654 ,143 ,626 ,129 ,572 .094 ,547 ,543 ,063 ,015 .004 965 884 868 862 .154 . 105 .063 EXPOSURE INDEX .492 .328 .392 .235 .219 .197 .195 .195 .276 .267 .262 .249 .169 .236 .160 .225 .157 .224 .156 .156 .156 .150 .148 .209 .144 .205 .142 .198 .138 .195 .195 .134 .128 .127 .122 .111 . 109 . 109 .146 . 159 . 154 HAZARD WEIGHTED UEIGHT INDEX 07 3.449 10 3.283 07 2.749 10 2.354 10 2.190 10 10 10 07 07 07 07 10 07 10 07 10 07 10 10 10 10 10 07 10 07 10 07 10 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 .977 .954 .954 .937 .872 .836 .747 .694 .652 .605 .577 .576 .573 .567 .565 .562 .500 .485 .465 .446 .440 .428 .392 .384 .370 .366 .345 .284 .270 .221 118 .098 .090 .022 07 .978 07 .941 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 3561PUMPS AND PUMPING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION -—NOHS SURVEYED--- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 7,903 11 IHFOM CODE 2370 9010 0160 1060 1620 1060 0290 1520 1631 2080 0577 0560 1520 > 1520 I 0360 Ł 2420 2 0760 1660 9210 0686 2000 1620 1790 1720 0874 2570 0926 1591 1591 1913 1591 0933 0527 1620 1620 1536 1842 1591 C0320 NOHS CODE 71860 M1806 20265 31500 44035 M0238 90320 80990 45315 57740 17695 17460 70131 M0130 11855 72085 20380 45930 94220 19430 M0600 44030 80056 46970 24130 A1010 27615 M0125 M0126 32385 MI693 81806 80243 M1634 81664 40430 50420 M0751 09070 TETRAMETHYL LEAD SILICA FLOUR ALUMINUM OXIDE ETHYL ALCOHOL MANGANESE OXIDES ALCOHOL ASPHALT IRON OXIDE, YELLOW MERCURY OXIDES PHOSPHINE CEMENT-PORTLAND CARBON MONOXIDE IRON OXIDE (FE304) FERROUS OXIDE BERYLLIUM OXIDES THALLIUM OXIDES CRESOL METHANOL WOODS CHROMIUM TRIOXIDE PARAFFIN MANGANESE DIOXIDE MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE TRICHLOROETHANE, 1.1,1- DICHLOROETHANE, 1,2- VAHADIUM OXIDES DIPHENYLAMINE LEAD MONOXIDE LEAD TETROXIDE ETHYLENE GLYCOL LEAD SOAP DIETHYL PHTHALATE CARBON MANGANOUS OXIDE MANGANESE OXIDE ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL NICKEL LEADED ZINC OXIDE BENZENE EXPOSURE FACTOR 1,063 1.051 2.301 2.276 965 2,203 648 912 630 624 878 846 842 830 578 578 540 738 497 463 459 642 1,439 596 408 578 1,306 386 382 377 370 1,223 337 463 463 300 290 285 271 EXPOSURE INDEX .134 .132 .291 .287 .122 .278 .081 .115 .079 .078 .111 .107 .106 .105 .073 .073 .068 .093 .062 .058 .058 .081 .182 .075 .051 .073 .165 .048 .048 .047 .046 .154 .042 .058 .058 .037 .036 .036 .034 HAZARD WEIGHT 07 07 03 03 07 03 10 07 10 10 07 07 07 07 10 10 10 07 10 10 10 07 03 07 10 07 03 10 10 10 10 03 10 07 07 10 10 10 10 WEIGHTED INDEX .941 .930 .873 .863 .854 .836 .819 .807 .797 .789 .777 .749 .745 .735 .731 .731 .683 .653 .628 .585 .580 .568 .546 .527 .516 .511 .495 .488 .483 .477 .468 .464 .426 .410 .410 .379 .366 .360 .342 296 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3561 OTHER TOTALS' 144.077 18.097 106.612 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN HOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 3569 GENERAL INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY, NEC. DESCRIPTION NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS IHFOM CODE 2080 0490 1842 0560 1520 1591 2537 203? 9050 1631 1591 5010 0360 > 2420 I 2590 •- 2490 5 18«2 0527 2460 5010 2570 1620 2229 2000 0230 0230 1591 2532 0686 9090 0170 0374 2620 1720 1018 C2580 1860 2611 1060 14)0 0160 NOHS CODE 57740 15630 50495 17460 4029? 42490 A1003 M2829 84055 45315 42685 52131 11855 72085 76720 73790 84269 80243 73300 52138 A1010 44035 M1463 M0600 A1433 07310 83453 82880 81876 17366 05250 8051? M0626 46970 M0347 76445 50742 77150 31500 38580 20265 PHOSPHINE CADMIUM OXIDES NICKEL OXIDES CARBON MONOXIDE IRON OXIDES LEAD TUNGSTEN OXIDES PETROLEUM SPIRITS SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED MERCURY OXIDES LEAD OXIDES OIL, CUTTING BERYLLIUM OXIDES THALLIUM OXIDES XYLENE ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO- NICKEL OXIDE CARBON TOLUENE OIL, LUBE VANADIUM OXIDES MANGANESE OXIDES IRON OXIDE, RED PARAFFIN ANTIMONY SULFIDE ANTIMONY LEAD NAPHTHENATE PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER CHROMIC ACID, LEADC2+) SALT (1:1) GRAPHITE AMMONIA SODIUM BORATE ZIRCONIUM OXIDE TRICHLOROETHAHE, 1,1,1- ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BIS(2- VINYL CHLORIDE NITRIC ACID ZINC CHLORIDE ETHYL ALCOHOL HYDROGEN CHLORIDE ALUMIN'IM OXIDE EXPOSURE FACTOR 329 293 293 333 304 209 280 182 221 144 138 137 129 129 181 167 115 112 154 92 129 129 123 85 77 77 72 92 59 81 79 79 77 76 53 49 48 48 159 65 150 EXPOSURE INDEX .178 .158 .158 .180 .164 .113 .151 .098 .119 .078 .074 .074 .069 .069 .098 .090 .062 .060 .083 .049 .069 .069 .066 .046 .041 .041 .039 .049 .031 .043 .042 .042 .041 .041 .028 .026 .026 .026 .086 .035 .081 HAZARD HEIGHT 10 10 10 07 07 10 07 10 07 10 10 10 10 10 07 07 10 10 07 10 07 07 07 10 10 10 10 07 10 07 07 07 07 07 10 10 10 10 03 07 03 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 3569 GENERAL INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY, NEC. DESCRIPTION IHFOM CODE 0874 1913 1460 1660 1790 1591 1060 0570 2310 9030 1680 0490 1190 > 1280 1 1280 *-• 2577 S 0530 0640 1591 0686 2020 1980 1290 1270 1340 1480 2540 1591 1591 1710 0020 0270 0391 0862 1420 1643 1903 2070 2040 NOHS CODE 24130 32385 38550 45930 48628 M1693 M0238 17490 70870 71055 h0420 15570 32550 81734 81932 84575 17367 18040 M0126 M0900 54790 81651 33640 33370 90883 38620 74990 83436 M0125 M0421 01568 07580 13103 23650 38575 45850 50A70 57710 55460 DICHLOROETHANE. 1.2- ETHYLENE GLYCOL HYDROGEN FLUORIDE METHANOL MOLYBDENUM OXIDES LEAD SOAP ALCOHOL CARBON TETRACHLORIDE SULFURIC ACID TALC BROMOMETHANE CADMIUM ETHYLENE OXIDE BROMINE TRIFLUORIDE PHOSPHORUS PENTAFLUORIDE VINYL BROMIDE CARBON DIOXIDE CHLORINE LEAD TETROXIDE CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04), ZINC SALT (1:1) TETRACHLOROETHYLENE OZONE FORMALDEHYDE FLUORINE GASOLINE. LEAD CONTENT UNKNOWN HYDROGEN SULFIDE TURPENTINE LEAD PHOSPHATE, DIBASIC LEAD MONOXIDE CHLOROMETHANE ACETIC ACID ARSIHE BROMINE PENTAFLUORIDE DIBOP.ANEU) HYDROGEN BROMIDE METHYL MERCAPTAH NITROGEN DIOXIDE PHOSGENE PHEHOL 252 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3569 EXPOSURE FACTOR 45 42 42 59 129 38 123 37 49 49 34 34 34 34 34 34 334 47 31 31 42 295 29 39 27 38 38 25 24 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 23 EXPOSURE INDEX .024 .022 .022 .031 .069 .020 .066 .020 .026 .026 .018 .018 .018 .018 .018 .018 .181 .025 .016 .016 .022 .159 .015 .021 .014 .020 .020 .013 .013 .018 .018 .018 .018 .018 .018 .018 .018 .018 .012 HAZARD HEIGHT 10 10 10 07 03 10 03 10 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 01 07 10 10 07 01 10 07 10 07 07 10 10 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 10 OTHER TOTALS: 12,458 6.623 .244 .227 .227 .223 .209 .206 .200 .200 .186 .186 .184 .184 .184 .184 .184 .184 .181 .178 .168 .168 .159 .159 .157 .148 .146 .144 .144 .135 .130 .129 .129 .129 .129 .129 .129 .129 .129 .129 .124 38.284 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS 1C INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 573 ELECTRONIC COMPUTING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION --- NOHS SURVEYED --- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 3. > 1 (— ' 00 IHFOM CODE 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 2037 1720 2432 2432 2432 2490 2000 1060 2532 0290 5010 1591 9090 2590 0874 2460 1591 C0320 5010 C9020 1010 2020 0686 1591" 2611 9050 0570 C0260 1591 1941 1970 1536 ioia 22,27 1560 NOHS CODE M0125 M0126 42685 81000 81677 84544 M2829 46970 73253 M0877 82157 73790 M0600 31500 82880 90320 52138 M1693 17366 76720 24130 73300 83453 09070 52131 90310 25145 54790 81876 91160 77150 84055 17490 07555 84546 51090 52480 40430 M0147 80172 40987 LEAD MONOXIDE LEAD TETROXIDE LEAD OXIDES LEAD SUBOXIDE LEAD TRIOXIDE LEAD DIOXIDE PETROLEUM SPIRITS TRICHLOROETHANE, 1,1,1- TIN OXIDES STANNIC OXIDE STANNOUS OXIDE ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO- PARAFFIN ETHYL ALCOHOL PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER ASPHALT OIL, LUBE LEAD SOAP GRAPHITE XYLENE DICHLOROETHANE, 1,2- TOLUEHE LEAD NAPHTHENATE BENZENE OIL, CUTTING ASBESTOS DIOXANE, 1.4- TETRACHLOROETHYLENE CHROMIC ACID, LEAD(2+> SALT (1:1) INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS ZINC CHLORIDE SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ARSENIC OXIDES LEAD SULFATE NITROPROPANE, 2- OXAl1C ACID ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL E1HYIHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BI5(2- PRODUCfS OF ROSIN CORE SOLDER ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL EXPOSURE FACTOR 643 643 631 615 615 615 593 723 625 615 615 477 328 1,052 441 307 298 288 406 406 282 345 234 216 212 209 194 241 168 168 162 225 152 140 140 131 125 121 120 1.161 1.151 EXPOSURE INDEX .163 .163 .159 .155 .155 .155 .150 .183 .158 .155 .155 .120 .083 .266 .111 .077 .075 .073 .102 .102 .071 .087 .059 .054 .053 .052 .049 .061 .042 .042 .041 .057 .038 .035 .035 .033 .031 .030 .0)0 .294 .291 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 07 07 07 07 10 03 07 10 10 10 07 07 10 07 10 10 10 10 10 07 10 10 10 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 01 01 WEIGHTED INDEX .630 .630 .599 .559 .559 .559 .503 .283 .109 .091 .091 .846 .831 .800 .782 .778 .755 .730 .720 .720 .715 .612 .593 .547 .537 .529 .491 .427 .425 .425 .410 .399 .385 .354 .354 .332 . 316 . 306 .304 .294 .291 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS -—NOHS SURVEYED--- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 3573 ELECTRONIC COMPUTING EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION 3,944 1 t-> 00 00 IHFOM CODE 2229 9210 1790 1430 0686 1290 0435 0760 0720 1842 1060 0374 I860 9030 2310 1040 0527 0926 1591 0020 0430 0860 1913 2570 1030 1620 2223 0490 0686 0230 0230 1631 0170 1660 0160 2540 0040 2620 0686 NOHS COPE M1461 94220 80056 38580 M0063 33640 29930 20380 19770 50420 M023A 80517 50742 71055 70870 31470 80243 27615 42490 01568 13980 M4016 32385 M1727 04980 44030 67405 15630 80064 A1433 07310 45315 05250 45930 20265 74990 02820 H0626 M0900 IRON OXIDE, RED WOODS MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE HYDROGEN CHLORIDE INORGANIC CHROMATES FORMALDEHYDE ETHANOL, 2-BUTOXY- CRESOL COBALT NICKEL ALCOHOL SODIUM BORATE NITRIC ACID TALC SULFURIC ACID ETHYL ACETATE CARBON DIPHENYLAMINE LEAD ACETIC ACID BUTANONE, 2- PEM1ANONE, 4-HYDROXY-4-METHYL-, 2- ETHYLENE GLYCOL VANADIUM OXIDE ETHAHOLAMINE MANGANESE DIOXIDE RHODIUM CAPMIUM OXIDES POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI) ANTIMONY SULFIDE ANTIMONY MERCURY OXIDES AMMONIA METHANOL ALUMINUM OXIDE TURPENTINE ACF.TOHE ZIRCONIUM OXIDE CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04), ZINC SALT (1:1) 222 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3573 EXPOSURE FACTOR 153 107 348 139 89 87 841 79 77 77 242 101 69 95 93 633 62 203 61 86 599 197 59 77 179 77 77 53 53 52 52 52 70 67 154 65 453 62 43 EXPOSURE INDEX .038 .027 .088 .035 .022 .022 .213 .020 .019 .019 .061 .025 .017 .024 .023 .160 .015 .051 .015 .021 .151 .049 .014 .019 .045 .019 .019 .013 .013 .013 .013 .013 .017 .016 .039 .016 .114 .015 .010 HAZARD WEIGHT 07 10 03 07 10 10 01 10 10 10 03 07 10 07 07 01 10 03 10 07 01 03 10 07 03 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 07 07 03 07 01 07 10 WEIGHTED INDEX .271 .271 .264 .246 .225 .220 .213 .200 .195 .195 .184 .179 .174 .168 .165 .160 .157 .154 .154 .152 .151 .149 .149 .136 .136 .136 .136 .134 .134 .131 .131 .131 .124 .118 .117 .115 .114 .110 .109 OTHER TOTALS: 31,663 7.913 42.584 image: ------- •1C INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN HOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 699 MACHINERY, EXCEPT ELECTRICAL, NEC. DESCRIPTION 2,299 39 IHFOM CODE 5010 5010 1842 0490 9050 0230 1591 2037 0230 1591 1520 2537 2490 > 2229 ' 2*20 w 1591 vo 2532 2590 2080 1631 0360 2420 2020 2611 0874 0220 1591 C0320 0160 0686' 1720 0570 0867 0686 0686 0760 2170 20J7 05 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 3599 MACHINERY, EXCEPT ELECTRICAL, NEC. 0686 ' 0290 Ł C0260 o 1591 1790 2000 9050 1790 0860 0620 0820 0830 2190 0924 0440 0460 1591 1591 0310 1560 1-591 9010 0577 0730 1730 1010 NOHS CODE 04980 17460 73300 31500 71055 A1010 44035 80990 M0238 45930 74990 27615 80243 81876 90320 07555 84546 80056 M0600 M1532 48628 M4016 18190 21560 21660 24390 25820 14380 13850 MO 125 M0126 M2929 40987 M1693 67915 17695 20170 47270 25145 ETHANOLAMINE CARBON MONOXIDE TOLUENE ETHYL ALCOHOL TALC VANADIUM OXIDES MANGANESE OXIDES IRON OXIDE, YELLOU ALCOHOL HETHAHOL TURPENTINE DIPHFNYLAMINE CARBON CHROMIC ACID, LEADC2+) SALT (1:1) ASPHALT ARSENIC OXIDES LEAD SULFATE MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE PAKAFFIN SILICA GEL MOLYBDENUM OXIDES PENTANONE, 4-HYDROXY-4-METHYL-, 2- CHLOROBENZENE CYCLOUEXANOL CYCLOHEXANONE DICHLOROPROPANE, 1,2- DIMETHYL-4-HEPTANOHE. 2,6- BUTYL ACETATE BUTANOL LEAD MONOXIDE LEAD TETROXIDE BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL LEAD SOAP SAND CEMENT-PORTLAND COPPER OXIDES DICMLOROUETHANE D10XAHE. 1,4- 269 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3599 EXPOSURE •FACTOR 533 225 223 505 212 209 209 198 446 189 180 343 102 91 81 71 71 220 65 92 209 198 175 175 175 175 175 470 464 45 45 401 375 36 51 49 316 314 2fl EXPOSURE INDEX .231 .097 .096 .219 .092 .090 .090 .086 .193 .082 .078 .149 .044 .039 .035 .030 .030 .095 .028 .040 .090 .086 .076 .076 .076 .076 .076 .204 .201 .019 .019 .174 .163 .015 .022 .021 .137 .136 .012 HAZARD WEIGHT 03 07 07 03 07 07 07 07 03 07 07 03 10 10 10 10 10 03 10 07 03 03 03 03 03 03 03 01 01 10 10 01 01 10 07 07 01 01 10 WEIGHTED INDEX .695 .685 .678 .658 .645 .636 .636 .602 .581 .575 .548 .447 .443 .395 .352 .308 .308 .287 .282 .280 .272 .258 .228 .228 .228 .228 .228 .204 .201 .195 .195 .174 .163 .156 .155 .149 .137 .136 .121 OTHER TOTALS: 29,062 12.507 73.365 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 3652 PHONOGRAPH RECORDS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 36 IHFOM CODE C0120 C2580 2583 2577 0290 2170 2037 1913 9050 0870 2280 2572 2582 1620 0170 0560 1903 2460 9090 0230 0230 0490 1591 1842 9210 1060 1060 1953 25J7 2620 2229 1520 0686 1460 1860 5010 1840 06C6 Olf>0 0790 2240 NOHS CODE 03800 76445 83011 84575 90320 M0256 M2829 32385 84055 03350 70130 76420 76510 M0921 05250 17460 50870 73300 17366 A1433 07310 15630 42490 50495 94220 M0238 31500 51118 A1003 M0626 M1463 40297 19360 38550 50742 52138 81904 90570 20T65 M0052 M0105 DESCRIPTION 1.1- FUSED 1,2- ACRYLONITRILE VINYL CHLORIDE DICHLOROETHYLENE, VINYL BROMIDE ASPHALT PROPANOL. 1- PETROLEUM SPIRITS ETHYLENE GLYCOL SILICA, AMORPHOUS DICHLOROETHYLENE, STYRENE VINYL ACETATE V1MYLTOLUENE MANGANESE DRIER AMMONIA CARBON MONOXIDE NITROGEN DIOXIDE TOLUENE GRAPHITE ANTIMONY SULFIDE ANTIMONY CADMIUM OXIDES LEAD NICKEL OXIDES WOODS ALCOHOL ETHYL ALCOHOL NITROUS OXIDE TUNGSTEN OXIDES ZIRCONIUM OXIDE IRON OXIDE. RED IRON OXIDES CHROMIC ACID HYDROGEN FLUORIDE NI1RIC ACID OIL, LUDE NICKEL SALTS CHROMOUS SALTS ALUMINUM OXIDE INORGANIC CYANIDES 1HU1GUI1C SILVER COMPOUNDS EXPOSURE FACTOR 42 42 42 42 7 5 5 5 7 42 42 42 42 5 5 5 5 5 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 5 5 5 2 2 2 2 EXPOSURE INDEX 1.166 1.166 1.166 1.166 .194 .138 .138 .138 .194 1.166 1.166 1.166 1.166 .138 .138 .138 .138 .138 .083 .055 .055 .055 .055 .055 .055 .138 .138 .138 .055 .055 .055 .055 .027 .027 .027 .027 .027 .027 .083 .027 027 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 01 01 01 01 07 07 07 07 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 03 03 03 07 07 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 03 07 07 WEIGHTE INDEX 1 .666 1 .666 1 .666 1 .666 .944 .388 .388 .388 .361 .166 .166 .166 .166 .972 .972 .972 .972 .972 .583 .555 .555 .555 .555 .555 .555 .416 .416 .416 .368 .388 .388 .388 .277 .277 .277 .277 .277 .277 .249 . 194 19<, image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 3652 PHONOGRAPH RECORDS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 36 1 > 1 1— • ^o NJ IHFOM CODE 9010 0020 1430 1779 2310 9030 0515 1170 2085 0933 0710 0430 0530 0435 1033 1540 1560 1730 1A90 I960 0070 1568 2430 2140 2260 NOHS CODE4 M1806 01568 38580 48535 70870 71055 15743 46935 58520 81806 M0628 13980 17367 29930 31350 40984 40987 47270 50745 81651 03298 41775 M0120 60440 69070 DESCRIPTION SILICA FLOUR ACETIC ACID HYDROGEN CHLORIDE MICA SULFURIC ACID TALC CALCIUM HYDROXIDE ETHYLENE GLYCOL MONOMETHYL ETHER ACETATE PHOSPHORIC ACID DIETHYL PHTHALATE NAPHTHA BUTANONE, 2- CARBON DIOXIDE ETHANOL, 2-BUTOXY- ETHOXYETHANOL, 2- ISOPROPYL ACETATE ISOPP.OPYL ALCOHOL DICHLOROMETHANE NITRIC OXIDE OZONE ACETYLENE KAOLIN INORGANIC TIN COMPOUNDS POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE SODIUM HYDROXIDE EXPOSURE FACTOR 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 2 6 2 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 2 1 1 1 EXPOSURE INDEX .027 .027 .027 .027 .027 .027 .166 .055 .166 .055 .138 .138 .138 .138 .138 .138 .138 .138 .138 .138 .055 .055 .027 .027 .027 HAZARD WEIGHT 07 07 07 07 07 07 01 03 01 03 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 WEIGHTED INDEX .194 .194 .194 .194 .194 .194 .166 .166 .166 .166 .138 .138 .138 .138 .138 .138 .138 .138 .138 .138 .055 .055 .027 .027 .027 MI»ST*NCFS FOR SIC 3652 OTHER TOTALS: 518 14.341 76.068 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALIH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 3662 RADIO AND TV COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION PETROLEUM SPIRITS ETHYLENE. TRICHLORO- 01L, CUTTING ZINC CHLORIDE HYDROGEN CHLORIDE TOLUEllE SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED DICHLOROETHANE, 1,2- XYLENE TR1CHLOROETHANE, 1.1,1- LEAD CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ETHYLENE GLYCOL ASPHALT METHANOL LEAD OXIDES POTASSIUM BIFLUORIDE GRAPHITE LEAD MONOXIDE CARBON ANTIMONY ALCOHOL LEAD TETROXIDE CRESOL DICHLOROBENZENE. ORTHO- LEAD DIOXIDE ANTIMONY SULFIDE LEAD SUBOXIDE LEAD TRIOXIDE ETHYL ALCOHOL TURPENTINE TETRACHLOROETHYLENE TIN OXIDES STANNIC OXIDE STAHIIOUS OXIDE SULFURIC ACID SODIUM BORATE BENZENE IRON OXIDE, RED PROPAIIOL, 1- ZIRCONIUM OXIDE NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 8,359 18 IHFOM CODE 2037 2490 5010 2611 1430 2460 9050 0874 2590 1720 1591 0570 1913 > 0290 I 1660 Ł 1591 Ł 1280 9090 1591 0527 0230 1060 1591 0760 0867 1591 0230 1591 1591 1060 2540 2020 2432 2432 2432 2310 0374 COJ20 2229 2170 2620 NOHS CODE M2829 73790 52131 77150 38580 73300 84055 24130 76720 46970 42490 17490 32385 90320 45930 42685 81945 17366 M0125 80243 07310 M0238 M0126 20380 24003 84544 A1433 81000 81677 31500 74990 54770 73253 M0877 82157 70370 80517 09070 MI463 N0256 M0626 EXPOSURE FACTOR 742 921 531 519 576 556 535 372 530 498 316 313 313 313 436 299 298 419 288 288 280 926 275 274 274 268 265 255 255 849 355 348 341 335 335 328 325 220 314 213 271 EXPOSURE INDEX .088 .110 .063 .062 .068 .066 .064 .044 .063 .059 .037 .037 .037 .037 .052 .035 .035 .050 .034 .034 .033 .110 .032 .032 .032 .032 .031 .030 .030 .101 .042 .041 .040 .040 .040 .039 .038 .026 .037 .026 .032 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 07 10 10 07 07 07 10 07 07 10 10 10 10 07 10 10 07 10 10 10 03 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 03 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 10 07 10 07 WEIGHTED INDEX .887 .771 .635 .620 .482 .465 .448 .445 .443 .417 .378 .374 .374 .374 .365 .357 .356 .350 .344 .344 .334 .332 .328 .327 .327 .320 .317 .305 .305 .304 .297 .291 .285 .280 .280 .274 .272 .263 .262 .260 .226 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 3662 RADIO AND TV COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION -—NOHS SURVEYED--- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 8.359 18 IHFOM CODE 1860 5010 0170 1030 2037 0540 2000 1560 C9020 9210 1290 1018 0160 > 2040 ' 0220 Ł 1536 *i 2532 0720 0686 1842 9030 2227 1970 2495 0686 0686 0020 1620 1591 2570 1460 2223 1591 1591 1620 0490 0522 0550 0686 NOHS CODE 50742 52138 05250 04980 M0630 17370 M0600 40987 90310 94220 33640 M0347 20265 55460 06580 40430 82880 19770 19430 50420 71055 80172 52480 73770 80064 19360 01568 44030 83453 M1727 38550 67405 M1693 91160 M0921 15630 15800 21660 61876 NITRIC ACID OIL, LUBE AMMONIA ETHANOLAMINE NAPHTHA-SOLVENT CARBON DISULFIDE PARAFFIN ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL ASBESTOS MOODS FORMALDEHYDE ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BIS(2- ALUMINUM OXIDE PHENOL ANILINE ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER COBALT CHROMIUM TRIOXIDE NICKEL TALC PRODUCTS OF ROSIN CORE SOLDER OXALIC ACID TRICHLOROETHANE. 1.1,2- POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI) CHROMIC ACID ACETIC ACID MANGANESE DIOXIDE LEAD NAPHTHENATE VANADIUM OXIDE HYDROGEN FLUORIDE RHODIUM LEAD SOAP INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS MANGANESE DRIER CADMIUM OXIDES CAMPHOR CYCLOHEXAHONE CHROMIC ACID, LEADC2O SALT (1 = 1) 362 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3662 EXPOSURE FACTOR 180 180 254 568 169 169 157 1.531 150 147 146 145 484 139 193 133 187 130 128 128 183 1,276 126 124 110 106 131 127 87 114 80 114 75 73 102 70 100 230 69 EXPOSURE INDEX .021 .021 .030 .067 .020 .020 .018 .183 .017 .017 .017 .017 .057 .016 .023 .015 .022 .015 .015 .015 .021 .152 .015 .014 .013 .012 .015 .015 .010 .013 .009 .013 .008 .008 .012 .008 .011 .027 .008 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 07 03 10 10 10 01 10 10 10 10 03 10 07 10 07 10 10 10 07 01 10 10 10 10 07 07 10 07 10 07 10 10 07 10 07 03 10 WEIGHTE INDEX .215 .215 .212 .203 .202 .202 .187 .183 .179 .175 .174 .173 .173 .166 .161 .159 .156 .155 .153 .153 .153 .152 .150 .148 .131 .126 .109 .106 .104 .095 .095 .095 .089 .087 .085 .083 .083 .082 .082 OTHER TOTALS: 41,052 4.742 26.257 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 3674 SEMICONDUCTORS AND RELATED DEVICES DESCRIPTION NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 25 1 IHFOM CODE 2432 2432 2432 2037 2611 0230 1430 1660 0230 1591 0645 1190 1290 > 2620 JL 2229 vo 9050 en 2581 0020 1720 2490 1010 5010 5010 2040 1591 0160 9010 1520 2537 ; 2532 1460 1860 2230 0926 1365 2215 0370 23JO 0310 00'. 0 0460 NOHS CODE 73253 M0877 82157 M2829 77150 07310 38580 45930 A1433 42490 29010 32550 33640 MO 6 26 M1463 84055 M1392 01568 46970 73790 25145 52131 52138 55460 83453 20265 MUD* 40297 80230 82880 38550 50742 68295 27615 35120 63550 81729 71197 M2929 023?0 1 1850 TIN OXIDES STANNIC OXIDE STANNOUS OXIDE PETROLEUM SPIRITS ZINC CHLORIDE ANTIMONY HYDROGEN CHLORIDE METHANOL ANTIMONY SULFIDE LEAD EPICHLOROHYDRIN ETHYLENE OXIDE FORMALDEHYDE ZIRCONIUM OXIDE IRON OXIDE, RED SILICA. AMORPHOUS FUSED VINYL CYCLOHEXENE DIOXIDE ACETIC ACID TRICHLOROETHANE. 1,1,1- ETIIYLENE. TRICHLORO- DIOXANE, 1,4- OIL, CUTTING OIL, LUBE PHENOL LEAD NAPHTHENATE ALUMINUM OXIDE IRONOXIDES TUNGSTEN CARBIDE PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER HYDROGEN FLUORIDE NITRIC ACID SELENIUM DIPHENYLAMINE GLYCIDOL PROPYIENE OXIDE BISMUTH TELLURIDE TELLURIUM BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE ACIIONE BUIAHOL EXPOSURE FACTOR 54 52 52 21 14 7 10 9 6 6 5 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 6 2 2 2 2 1 1 « i 2 5 5 5 1 2 2 2 EXPOSURE INDEX 2.160 2.080 2.080 .840 .560 .280 .400 .360 .240 .240 .200 .200 .200 .240 .240 .240 .200 .200 .160 .160 .080 .080 .080 .080 .080 .240 .080 .080 .080 .080 .040 .040 .040 .030 .200 .200 .200 . 040 . 080 .080 .080 HAZARD UEIGHT 07 07 07 10 10 10 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 03 07 07 07 07 10 10 10 U J 01 01 01 03 01 01 01 15.120 14.560 14.560 8.400 .600 .800 .800 5. 2. 2. 2.520 400 400 000 000 000 .680 .680 .680 .400 .400 .120 .120 .800 .800 .800 .800 .800 .720 .560 .560 .560 .560 .400 .400 .400 !200 .200 .200 . 120 .080 .080 .080 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS sic INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 3674 SEMICONDUCTORS AND RELATED DEVICES ---NOHS SURVEYED—- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 25 1 IHFOM CODE 0505 0871 1560 2085 2430 1517 NOHS CODE DESCRIPTION 15705 CALCIUM CARBONATE 24095 DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE 40987 ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL 58520 PHOSPHORIC ACID 73075 TIN 84474 IODOFORM 47 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3674 OTHER TOTALS: EXPOSURE FACTOR 2 2 2 2 2 1 344 EXPOSURE HAZARD INDEX WEIGHT .080 .080 .080 .080 .080 .040 13.760 01 01 01 01 01 01 UEIGHTET INDEX .080 .080 .080 .080 .080 1040 97.040 10 a\ image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY UEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 3679 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS. NEC. DESCRIPTION 7.188 26 IHFOM CODE 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 2037 2310 9210 1591 0686 1591 1720 2460 2611 1430 2590 2490 5010 1591 1591 C0320 1591 2020 1591 0874 1591 1591 1591 1591 0686 0686 1591 1591 1590 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 NOHS CODE M0126 42685 M0125 81000 81677 84544 M2829 70870 94220 91160 81876 84546 46970 73300 77150 38580 76720 73790 52131 M0124 84473 09070 M1015 54790 84278 24130 82952 84545 A1297 M0751 M0814 M0886 M1387 M1685 42510 80252 80832 81877 83015 81062 aiceo LEAD TETROXIDE LEAD OXIDES LEAD MONOXIDE LEAD SUBOXIDE LEAD TRIOXIDE LEAD DIOXIDE PETROLEUM SPIRITS SULFURIC ACID WOODS INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS CHROMIC ACID, LEAD(2+) SALT LEAD SUIFATE TRICHLOROETHANE. 1,1,1- TOLUENE ZINC CHLORIDE HYDROGEN CHLORIDE XYLEHE EfHYLENE. TRICHLORO- OIL, CUTTING LEAD BOROFLUORIDE LEAD NITRATE ' BENZENE LEAD BOROSILICATE TETRACHLOROETHYLENE LEAD TITANATES DFCHLOROETHANE, LEAD GERMANATE LEAD SILICATE LEAD CARBONATE, LEADED ZINC OXIDE LEAD CHROHATE. LEAD LEAD CHROMATE, LEAD HYDROXIDE LEAD BORATE LEAD ARSENATE LEAD CARBONATE LEAD CMLOROSILICATE COMPLEX IEAD PHOSPHITE LEAD FLUORIDE IFAD SULTATE. TRIBASIC LfAD Z1RCOMATE (1 = 1) 1.2- BASIC MOLYBDATE. MOLYBDATED LEAD SUIFATE COMPLEX EXPOSURE FACTOR .211 .200 .175 .148 ,148 ,148 810 1,056 655 617 615 615 864 855 596 825 803 796 553 550 547 545 516 719 503 497 476 472 467 467 467 467 467 467 467 467 467 467 467 467 467 EXPOSURE INDEX .168 .166 .163 .159 .159 .159 .112 .146 .091 .085 .085 .085 .120 .118 .082 .114 .111 .110 .076 .076 .076 .075 .071 .100 .069 .069 .066 .065 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 . 064 .064 .064 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 10 10 10 10 07 07 10 07 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 UEIGHTED INDEX .68* .669 .634 .597 .597 .597 .126 1.028 .911 .858 .855 .855 .841 .832 .829 .803 .781 .775 .769 .765 .760 .758 .717 .700 .699 .691 .662 .656 .649 .649 .649 .649 .649 .649 .649 .649 .649 .649 .649 .649 .649 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 3679 ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS. NEC. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTMI ION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS —HOHS SURVEYED—- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 7,188 26 IHFOM CODE 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 1591 2432 2432 2432 1280 9050 5010 > 1660 ' 0527 Ł 1060 oo 9090 2000 1860 0374 1290 2532 1591 1010 1460 1941 0170 9030 1060 1913 0290 0570 0760 0490 2080 1842 2040 2229 2240 NOHS CODE 83081 83299 83436 83915 84433 84439 84743 M0877 73253 82157 81945 84055 52138 45930 80243 31500 17366 M0600 50742 80517 33640 82880 83453 25145 38550 5,1090 05250 71055 M0238 32385 90320 17490 20380 15630 57740 50495 55460 111463 M1804 DESCRIPTION LEAD ZIRCONATE TITANATE LEAD MOLYBDATE LEAD PHOSPHATE. DIBASIC LEAD PHOSPHATE, TRIBASIC LEAD SULFIDE LEAD CHLORIDE LEAD SILICOCHROMATE STANNIC OXIDE TIN OXIDES STANNOUS OXIDE POTASSIUM BIFLUORIDE SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED OIL, LUBE METHANOL CARBON ETHYL ALCOHOL GRAPHITE PARAFFIN NITRIC ACID SODIUM BORATE FORMALDEHYDE PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER LEAD NAPHTHENATE DIOXANE, 1,4- HYDROGEN FLUORIDE NITROPROPANE, 2- AMMONIA TALC ALCOHOL ETHYLENE GLYCOL ASPHALT CARBON TETRACHLORIDE CRESOL CAOI1IUM OXIDES PHOSPHINE NICKEL OXIDES PHENOL IRON OXIDE. RED SILVER POWDER 379 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3679 EXPOSURE FACTOR 467 467 467 467 467 467 467 616 612 610 421 587 409 569 382 1,260 527 359 322 436 302 427 289 283 280 275 391 390 887 264 252 249 247 235 223 222 216 280 268 EXPOSURE INDEX .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .064 .085 .085 .084 .058 .081 .056 .079 .053 .175 .073 .049 .044 .060 .042 .059 .040 .039 .038 .038 .054 .054 .123 .036 .035 .034 .034 .032 .031 .030 .030 .038 .037 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 07 07 10 07 10 07 10 03 07 10 10 07 10 07 10 10 10 10 07 07 03 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 07 WEIGHTED INDEX .649 .649 .649 .649 .649 .649 .649 .599 .595 .594 .585 .571 .569 .554 .531 .525 .513 .499 .447 .424 .420 .415 .402 .393 .389 .382 .380 .379 .370 .367 .350 .346 .343 .326 .310 .308 .300 .272 .260 OTHER TOTALS' 72,097 9.834 66.697 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 1769 SPACE VEHICLE EQUIPMENT. NEC. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN HOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 38 IHFOM CODE 5010 5010 1591 2490 2532 1060 1030 0926 0230 0230 1591 2620 •b, 2229 I 9050 H> 2000 ^> 1591 ^ 9090 0310 0160 1060 1790 0460 0440 NOHS CODE 52131 52138 83453 73790 82880 M0238 04980 27615 A1433 07310 42490 M0626 M1463 84055 M0600 M1693 17366 M2929 20265 31500 80056 13850 14380 DESCRIPTION OIL. CUTTING OIL. LUBE LEAD NAPHTHENATE ETHYLEHE. TRICHLORO- PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER ALCOHOL ETHANOLAMINE DIPHENYLAMINE ANTIMONY SULFIDE ANTIMONY LEAD ZIRCONIUM OXIDE IRON OXIDE. RED SILICA. AMORPHOUS FUSED PARAFFIN LEAD SOAP GRAPHITE BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE ALUMINUM OXIDE ETHYL ALCOHOL MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE BUTANOL BUTYL ACETATE EXPOSURE FACTOR 72 36 36 36 36 72 72 36 10 10 10 10 10 10 6 6 6 36 10 7 6 7 7 EXPOSURE INDEX 1.894 .947 .947 .947 .947 1.894 1.894 .947 .263 .263 .263 .263 .263 .263 .157 .157 .157 .947 .263 .184 .157 .184 .184 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 10 07 07 03 03 03 10 10 10 07 07 07 10 10 07 01 03 03 03 01 01 UEIGHTEI INDEX 18.947 9.473 9.473 6.631 6.631 5.684 5.684 2.842 2.631 2.631 2.631 .842 .842 .842 .578 .578 .105 .947 .789 .552 .473 .184 .184 23 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3769 OTHER TOTALS: 547 14.385 86.174 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 3811 ENGINEERING t SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS DESCRIPTION NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 4,632 12 > 1 to o o IHFOM CODE 2037 2490 1720 5010 5010 2611 1060 1430 2460 2310 0290 I860 C0320 0645 1190 1591 0686 1060 2000 9050 2590 0874 2532 1280 1536 1460 C9020 2495 9090 1913 1018 1591 1591 2581 1660 0170 C25BO 0680 1842 1010 0720 NOHS CODE M2829 73790 46970 52131 52138 77150 31500 38580 73300 70870 90320 50742 09070 29010 32550 83453 19360 M0238 M0600 84055 76720 24130 82880 81945 40430 38550 90310 73770 17366 32385 M0347 M0125 M0126 M1392 45930 05250 76445 18260 50420 25145 19770 PETROLEUM SPIRITS ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO- TRICHLOROETHANE, 1.1.1- OIL, CUTTING OIL. LUBE ZINC CHLORIDE ETHYL ALCOHOL HYDROGEN CHLORIDE TOLUENE SULFURIC ACID ASPHALT NITRIC ACID BENZENE EPICHLOROHYDRIN ETHYLENE OXIDE LEAD NAPHTHENATE CHROMIC ACID ALCOHOL PARAFFIN SILICA. AMORPHOUS FUSED XYLENE DICHIOROETHANE. 1,2- PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER POTASSIUM BIFLUORIDE ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL HYDROGEN FLUORIDE ASBESTOS TRICHLOROETHANE. 1,1,2- GRAPHITE ETHYLEHE GLYCOL ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE. BIS(2- LEAD MONOXIDE LEAD TETROXIDE VINYL CYCLOHEXENE DIOXIDE METHANOL AMMONIA VINYL CHLORIDE CHLOROPRENE NICKEL DIOXANE. 1.4- COBALT EXPOSURE FACTOR 781 888 884 503 487 479 1.561 631 614 568 386 381 318 317 315 309 303 963 282 397 396 270 374 261 255 241 235 234 334 230 227 222 222 315 305 304 211 203 194 188 1A7 EXPOSURE INDEX .168 .191 .190 .108 .105 .103 .337 .136 .132 .122 .083 .082 .068 .068 .068 .066 .065 .207 .060 .085 .085 .058 .080 .056 .055 .052 .050 .050 .072 .049 .049 .047 .047 .068 .065 .065 .045 .043 .041 .040 .040 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 07 07 10 10 10 03 07 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 03 10 07 07 10 07 10 10 10 10 10 07 10 10 10 10 07 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 WEIGHTED INDEX .686 .341 .335 .085 .051 .034 .011 .953 .927 .858 .833 .822 .686 .684 .680 .667 .654 .623 .608 .599 .598 .582 .565 .563 .550 .520 .507 .505 .504 .496 .490 .479 .479 .476 .460 .459 .455 .438 .418 .405 .403 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 3811 ENGINEERING I SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS DESCRIPTION NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 4,632 12 IHFOM CODE 0570 1591 0527 2227 1941 0230 0160 1290 9210 0686 0374 0686 ^ U31 ^ 1030 K> 1"0 o 0230 i- 0670 1591 1591 C0260 1591 0020 2570 1620 2223 2229 1560 2620 1591 1591 2040 2020 0926 1340 1591 1591 1591 2540 0040 NOHS CODE 17490 42490 80243 80172 51090 07310 20265 33640 94220 M0900 80517 81876 45315 04980 52480 A1433 18500 A1297 M0751 07545 80252 01568 M1727 44030 67405 M1463 40987 M0626 42685 M1693 55460 54790 27615 M0541 81000 81677 84544 74990 02820 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE LEAD CARBON PRODUCTS OF ROSIN CORE SOLDER NITROPROPANE. 2- ANTIMONY ALUMINUM OXIDE FORMALDEHYDE WOODS CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04), ZINC SALT (1:1) SODIUM BORATE CHROMIC ACID. LEADC2O SALT (1:1) MERCURY OXIDES ETHANOLAMINE OXALIC ACID ANTIMONY SULFIDE CHLOROFORM LEAD CARBONATE, BASIC LEADED ZINC OXIDE ARSENIC LEAD CARBONATE ACETIC ACID VANADIUM OXIDE MANGANESE DIOXIDE RHODIUM IRON OXIDE, RED ISUrktirfl uLCGHGL ZIRCONIUM OXIDE LEAD OXIDES LEAD SOAP PHENOL TETRACHLOROETHYLENE DIPHENYLAMIME GASOLINES LEAD SUBOXIDE LEAD TRIOXIDE LEAD DIOXIDE TURPENTINE ACETONE EXPOSURE FACTOR 177 165 159 1,570 153 148 484 143 143 141 201 138 136 434 130 127 124 123 123 123 123 172 165 165 165 163 1.033 145 •38 96 95 133 299 83 78 78 78 110 740 EXPOSURE INDEX .038 .035 .034 .338 .033 .031 .104 .030 .030 .030 .043 .029 .029 .093 .028 .027 .026 .026 .026 .026 .026 .037 .035 .035 .035 .035 .223 .031 .021 .020 .020 .028 . OA4 .017 .016 .016 .016 .023 . 159 HAZARD UEIGHT 10 10 10 01 10 10 03 10 10 10 07 10 10 03 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 07 07 07 07 01 07 10 10 10 07 l\\ 10 10 10 10 07 01 .382 .356 .343 .338 .330 .319 .313 .308 .308 .304 .303 .297 .293 .281 .280 .274 .267 .265 .265 .265 .265 .259 .249 .249 .249 .246 .223, .219 .211 .207 .205 .200 l image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AMD HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 3999 MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES, NEC. DESCRIPTION ---NOHS SURVEYED—- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 993 14 ft \ N) 0 N) IHFOM CODE 2000 2037 9050 0374 2540 1060 0933 0170 9210 2460 1060 0290 9090 1913 1797 2590 1018 9030 9085 0230 1290 1536 C2580 0527 0680 1591 1591 C9020 1591 0735 1170 0490 0720 1280 1842 2230 1591 1591 1560 5010 2540 NOHS- CODE M0600 M2829 84055 80517 74990 31500 81806 05250 94220 73300 M0238 90320 17366 32385 48910 76720 M0347 71055 68768 07310 33640 40430 76445 80243 18260 M0125 M0126 90310 42490 94040 46935 15570 19770 33595 50420 68295 M1693 42685 40987 52131 til J22 PARAFFIN PETROLEUM SPIRITS SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED SODIUM BORATE TURPENTINE ETHYL ALCOHOL DIETHYL PHTHALATE AMMONIA WOODS TOLUENE ALCOHOL ASPHALT GRAPHITE ETHYLENE GLYCOL MORPHOLINE XYLENE ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BIS(2- TALC SOAPSTONE ANTIMONY FORMALDEHYDE ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL VIHYL CHLORIDE CARBOH CHLOROPRENE LEAD MONOXIDE LEAD TETROXIDE ASBESTOS LEAD COTTON ETHYLENE GLYCOL MOHOMETHYL ETHER ACETATE CADMIUM COBALT FLUORSPAR. NICKEL SELENIUM LEAD SOAP LEAD OXIDES ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL OIL. CUTTING TURPENTINE (GUM) EXPOSURE FACTOR 833 342 334 309 306 677 654 271 167 198 354 104 121 82 264 109 57 73 69 47 42 41 39 37 35 33 33 33 31 41 94 28 28 28 28 28 27 27 269 25 35 EXPOSURE INDEX .838 .344 .336 .311 .308 .681 .658 .272 .168 .199 .356 .104 .121 .082 .265 .109 .057 .073 .069 .047 .042 .041 .039 .037 .035 .033 .033 .033 .031 .041 .094 .028 .028 .028 .028 .028 .027 .027 .270 .025 .035 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 07 07 07 03 03 07 10 07 03 10 07 10 03 07 10 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 03 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 01 10 07 WEIGHTED INDEX 8.388 3.444 2.354 2.178 2.157 2.045 .975 .910 .681 .395 .069 .047 .852 .825 .797 .768 .574 .514 .486 .473 .422 .412 .392 .372 .352 .332 .332 .332 .312 .289 .283 .281 .281 .281 .281 .281 .271 .271 .270 .251 .246 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN HOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 3999 MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES. NEC. DESCRIPTION NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 993 14 > 1 K) O U) IHFOM CODE 2532 2490 1620 9010 2620 0230 0686 1591 5010 1842 1591 0490 1591 2229 C0320 0430 2620 0040 2170 0360 1631 2060 2420 2682 C2650 0020 2040 2611 1591 1591 0527 0686 0686 0686 1591 1591 0686 1591 0686 NOHS CODE 82880 73790 44000 66495 77265 A1433 81876 M0751 52138 50495 84546 15630 91160 M1463 09070 13980 M0626 02820 M0256 11855 45315 57740 72085 80219 83341 01568 55460 77150 A1297 M0124 M0647 M0814 M0886 M0926 Ml 01 5 M1387 M1488 M16B5 M2265 PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER ETHYLENE. TRICHLORO- MANGANESE QUARTZ ZIRCONIUM ANTIMONY SULFIDE CHROMIC ACID. LEADC2+) SALT (1:1) LEADED ZINC OXIDE OIL. LUBE NICKEL OXIDES LEAD SULFATE CADMIUM OXIDES INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS IRON OXIDE. RED BENZENE BUTANONE, 2- ZIRCONIUM OXIDE ACETONE PROPAHOL. 1- BERYLLIUM OXIDES MERCURY OXIDES PHOSPHINE THALLIUM OXIDES TETRAETHYLTHIURAM DISULFIDE MOCA ACETIC ACID PHENOL ZIMC CHLORIDE LEAD CARBONATE. BASIC LEAD BOROFLUOKIDE C.I. 77266-PIGMENT BLACK 7 LEAD CHROMATE, LEAD MOLYBDATE, LEAD SULFATE COMPLEX LEAD CHROMATE, MOLYBDATED C.I. 77600-PIGMENT YELLOW 34 LEAD BOROSILICATE LEAD HYDROXIDE CHROME ORANGE LEAD BORATE BARIUM CHROMATE EXPOSURE FACTOR 34 29 28 28 28 19 18 17 17 16 16 15 15 21 14 137 19 124 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 16 11 11 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 EXPOSURE INDEX .034 .029 .028 .028 .028 .019 .018 .017 .017 .016 .016 .015 .015 .021 .014 .137 .019 . 124 .012 .012 .012 .012 .012 .012 .012 .016 .011 .011 .010 .010 .010 .010 .010 .010 .010 .010 .010 .010 .010 HAZARD WEIGHT 07 07 07 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 10 01 07 01 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 .239 .204 .197 .197 .197 .191 .181 .171 .171 .161 .161 .151 .151 .148 . 140 .137 .133 .124 .120 .120 .120 .120 .120 .120 .120 .112 .110 .110 .100 .100 . 100 .100 .100 .100 . 100 . 100 . 100 . 100 . 100 247 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 3999 OTHER TOTALS: 9, 9.177 53.424 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 4930 COMBINATION UTILITY SERVICES OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AMD HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOUS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS ---NOHS SURVEYED--- EflPLOYMENT FIRMS 3.385 5 IHFOM CODE 1989 2228 0680 C2580 1595 0675 0790 2425 2216 2427 1790 0933 > 9050 I 0360 Ł 0490 ^ 1591 1842 2420 1060 1060 1030 2080 1170 0926 0850 2720 0932 1646 1616 1520 2537 2570 1620 0867 0310 0720 0560 0527 2229 HOHS CODE 54160 67530 18260 76445 09318 M0419 M2865 28880 65070 71900 80056 81806 84055 11855 15630 42685 50495 72085 31500 M0238 04980 57740 46935 27615 M0377 23360 26420 46210 80046 40297 A1003 A1010 44035 24003 M2929 19770 17460 B0243 M1463 DESCRIPTION PENTACHLOROPHENOL ROTENOHE CHLOROPRENE VINYL CHLORIDE LINDANE TRICHLORONITROMETHANE CALCIUM CYANIDE ENDOSULFAN PYRETHRUM TETRAMETHYLTHIURAM DISULFIDE MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE DIETHYL PHTHALATE SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED BERYLLIUM OXIDES CADMIUM OXIDES LEAD OXIDES NICKEL OXIDES THALLIUM OXIDES ETHYL ALCOHOL ALCOHOL ETHANOLAMINE PHOSPHINE ETHYLENE GLYCOL MONOMETHYL ETHER ACETATE DIPHENYLAMINE PHOSPHORIC ACID, 2,2-DICHIOROVINYL DIMETHYL ESTER PHOSPHOROTHIOIC ACID. 0,0-DIETHYL 0-<2-ISOPROPYL-6-METHYL-4- PHOSPHORIC ACID. 1,2-DIBROMO-2,2-DICHLOROETHYL DIMETHYL ESTE METHOXYCHLOR DIETHYL MERCAPTOSUCCINATE. 0,0- DIMETHYLDITHIOPHOSPHATE OF IRON OXIDES TUNGSTEN OXIDES VANADIUM OXIDES MANGANESE OXIDES DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHO- BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE COBALT CARBON MONOXIDE CARBON IRON OXIDE. RED EXPOSURE FACTOR 718 685 458 448 618 615 615 615 615 615 1.339 999 412 253 253 253 253 253 836 697 697 198 652 647 615 615 615 615 615 255 253 253 253 154 1.454 143 198 133 189 EXPOSURE INDEX .212 .202 .135 .132 .182 .181 .181 .181 .181 .181 .395 .295 .121 .074 .074 .074 .074 .074 .246 .205 .205 .058 .192 .191 .181 .181 .181 .181 .181 .075 .074 .074 .074 .045 .429 .042 .058 .039 .055 HAZARD HEIGHT 07 07 10 10 07 07 07 07 07 07 03 03 07 10 10 10 10 10 03 03 03 10 03 03 03 03 03 03 03 07 07 07 07 10 01 10 07 10 07 UEIGHTE INDEX 1.484 1.416 1.353 1.323 1.277 1.271 .271 .271 .271 .271 .186 .885 .851 .747 .747 .747 .747 .747 .740 .617 .617 .584 .577 .573 .545 .545 .545 .545 .54S .527 .523 .523 .523 .454 .429 .422 .409 .392 .390 226 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 4930 OTHER TOTALS: 71,792 21.079 137.025 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 5080 MACHINERY, EQUIPMENT, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS IHFOM CODE 5010 1591 2490 2532 2037 2611 2460 0686 0374 2590 0874 0570 0760 > 1591 M 200° o 9050 ui 1720 2020 9090 1591 C0320 1660 2170 2037 0540 0867 9030 022Q 0290 0230 0230 1591 2540 0926 1060 2229 1340 1591 1911 1591 0527 NOHS CODE 52138 83453 73790 82880 M2829 77150 73300 M0063 80517 76720 24130 17490 20380 91160 M0600 84055 46970 54790 17366 M1693 09070 45930 M0256 M0630 17370 24003 71055 06580 90320 A1433 07310 42490 74990 27615 31500 MI463 90880 84546 J2J85 42685 80243 AND SUPPLIES DESCRIPTION 1,916 33 OIL. LUBE LEAD NAPHTHENATE ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO- PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER PETROLEUM SPIRITS ZINC CHLORIDE TOLUENE INORGANIC CHROMATES SODIUM BORATE XYLENE DICHLOROETHANE, 1,2- CARBON TETRACHLORIDE CRESOL INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS PARAFFIN SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED TRICHLOROETHANE. 1. LI- TE TRACHLOROETHYLENE GRAPHITE LEAD SOAP BENZENE METHANOL PROPANOL, 1- NAPHTHA-SOLVENT CARBON DISULFIDE DICHLOROBtNZtNb, ORfHO- TALC ANILINE ASPHALT ANTIMONY SULFIDE ANTIMONY LEAD TURPENTINE DIPHENYIAMINE ETHYL ALCOHOL IRON OXIDE, RED GASOLINE-LEADED LEAD 5ULFATE ETHYLENE GlYCOL IFAD OXIDES CARBON EXPOSURE FACTOR 454 387 520 452 305 254 362 248 319 315 218 210 193 190 183 261 253 253 245 168 154 207 141 140 140 140 195 157 125 115 115 115 164 382 382 145 97 96 93 91 90 EXPOSURE INDEX .236 .201 .271 .235 .159 .132 .188 .129 .166 .164 .113 .109 .100 .099 .095 .136 .132 .132 .127 .087 .080 .108 .073 .073 .073 .073 .101 .097 .065 .060 .060 .040 .085 .199 .199 .075 .050 .050 .048 . 047 .046 HAZARD HEIGHT 10 10 07 07 10 10 07 10 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 07 07 07 07 10 10 07 10 10 10 10 07 07 10 10 10 i n * V 07 03 03 07 0 0 0 0 0 2.369 2.019 1.899 1.651 1.591 1.325 1.322 1.294 1.165 1.150 1.137 1.096 1.007 .991 .955 .953 .924 .924 .895 .876 .803 .756 .735 .730 .730 .730 .712 .683 .652 .600 .600 4 n n !599 .598 .598 .529 .506 .501 .485 .474 .469 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS ilC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 5080 MACHINERY, EQUIPMENT. AND SUPPLIES DESCRIPTION ---NOHS SURVEYED—- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 1.916 33 IHFOM CODE 0490 2620 1591 1591 1842 2360 2370 2310 5010 1790 0686 C0260 •> C9020 I 0686 «"J 1631 S 2090 1520 1591 0686 2537 C0260 1520 1018 0360 2420 2080 C2580 1560 0160 0310 1030 0860 0170 0620 0820 0830 2190 0924 1591 NOHS CODE 15630 M0626 M0125 M0126 50495 71640 71860 70870 52131 80056 80064 07545 90310 81876 45315 81650 40297 80252 M0900 A1003 07555 80990 M0347 11855 72085 57740 76445 40987 20265 M2929 04980 M4016 05250 18190 21560 21660 24390 25820 81000 CADMIUM OXIDES ZIRCONIUM OXIDE LEAD MONOXIDE LEAD TETROXIDE NICKEL OXIDES TETRAETHYL LEAD TETRAMETHYL LEAD SULFURIC ACID OIL, CUTTING MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI) ARSENIC ASBESTOS CHROMIC ACID, LEAD<2*> SALT U^l) MERCURY OXIDES PHOSPHORUS IRON OXIDES LEAD CARBONATE CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04), ZINC SALT (1:1) TUNGSTEN OXIDES ARSENIC OXIDES IRON OXIDE. YELLOW ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE. BISC2- BERYLLIUM OXIDES THALLIUM OXIDES PHOSPHIIIE VINYL CHLORIDE ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL ALUMINUM OXIDE BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE ETHANOLAMINE PEMTANONE, 4-HYDROXY-4-METHYL-, 2- AMMOMIA CHLOROBENZENE CYCLOHEXAHOL CYCIOHEXAHOHE DICHLOROPROPANE. 1.2- DIJ1ETHYL-4-HEPTANONE. 2.6- LEAD SUBOXIDE 226 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 5080 EXPOSURE FACTOR 83 116 81 81 80 107 107 103 72 239 70 68 66 64 63 63 85 59 57 80 54 76 53 53 53 52 51 496 158 460 151 145 62 140 140 140 140 140 38 EXPOSURE INDEX .043 .060 .042 .042 .041 .055 .055 .053 .037 .124 .036 .035 .034 .033 .032 .032 .044 .030 .029 .041 .028 .039 .027 .027 .027 .027 .026 .258 .082 .240 .078 .075 .032 .073 .073 .073 .073 .073 .019 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 07 10 10 10 07 07 07 10 03 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 10 10 07 10 07 10 10 10 10 10 01 03 01 03 03 07 03 03 03 03 03 10 WEIGHTED INDEX .433 .423 .422 .422 .417 .390 .390 .376 .375 .374 .365 .354 .344 .334 .328 .328 .310 .307 .297 .292 .281 .277 .276 .276 .276 .271 .266 .258 .247 .240 .236 .227 .226 .219 .219 .219 .219 .219 .198 OTHER TOTALS: 21,160 10.939 59.061 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 5090 MISC. DURABLE GOODS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS ---NOHS SURVEYED—- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 211 10 1 tvJ 0 ~J IHFOM CODE 5010 1591 2490 2532 0926 0760 0310 1913 0527 2<.fcO 2590 0374 2037 0570 0874 1290 2040 1060 0522 1660 2170 2000 2037 C0320 0540 0867 I860 1970 0290 1060 1989 2540 9050 1680 1630 C0120 0230 0230 1 140 1 169 5010 NOHS CODE 52138 83453 73790 82880 27615 20380 M2929 32385 80 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 5090 MISC. DURABLE GOODS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS —-NOHS SURVEYED—- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 211 10 IHFOM CODE 0847 2611 1280 0020 0170 0220 1720 2020 0675 2229 0790 1030 to 1595 I 9090 to 2425 0 2216 00 2228 2310 2427 2586 0230 0686 C0260 1591 0820 2620 1620 1520 9030 0860 0620 0830 2190 0924 1040 1210 1591 1591 0710 HOHSi CODE 73750 77150 84425 01568 05250 06580 46970 54790 M0419 M1463 M2865 04980 09318 17366 28880 65070 67530 70870 71900 76610 A1433 M0063 07545 42490 21560 M0626 M0921 40297 71055 M4016 18190 21660 24390 25S20 31470 32590 M0125 M0126 notes DESCRIPTION DICHLORODIPHENYLTRICHLOROETHANE ZINC CHLORIDE SODIUM FLUORIDE ACETIC ACID AMMONIA ANILINE TRICHLOROETHANE, 1.1.1- TETRACHLOROETHYLENE TRICHLORONITROMETHANE IRON OXIDE. RED CALCIUM CYANIDE ETHANOLAMINE LINDANE GRAPHITE ENDOSULFAN PYRETHRUM ROTENOHE SULFURIC ACID TETRAMETHYLTHIURAN DISULFIDE WARFARIN ANTIMONY SULFIDE INORGANIC CHROMATES ARSENIC LEAD CYCLOHEXANOL ZIRCONIUM OXIDE MANGANESE DRIER IRON OXIDES TALC PEHTANOHE. 4-HYDROXY-4-METHYL-, 2- CHLOROBENZENE CYCLOHEXANONE DICHLOROPROPANE. 1.2- D1METHYL-4-HEPTANONE. 2.6- ETHYL ACETATE ETHYL ETHER LEAD MONOXIDE LEAD TETROXIDE NAPHTHA 134 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 5090 EXPOSURE FACTOR 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 7 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 5 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 12 12 1 1 10 EXPOSURE INDEX .014 .014 .014 .018 .018 .018 .018 .018 .014 .014 .014 .033 .014 .014 .014 .014 .014 .014 .014 .014 .009 .009 .009 .009 .023 .009 .009 .009 .009 .018 .018 .018 .018 .018 .056 .056 .004 .004 .047 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 10 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 03 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 10 10 10 10 03 07 07 07 07 03 03 03 03 03 01 01 10 10 01 OTHER TOTALS: 1.135 5.300 .142 .142 .142 .132 .132 .132 .132 .132 .099 .099 .099 .099 .099 .099 .099 .099 .099 .099 .099 .099 .094 .094 .094 .094 .071 .066 .066 .066 .066 .056 .056 .056 .056 .056 .056 .056 .047 .047 .047 31.997 image: ------- INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION NEW AND USED CAR DEALERS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY UEIGHTED INDEX UITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 1,669 31 IHFOM CODE 2037 1913 0374 2611 0686 1591 2590 C9020 0874 9090 5010 2460 i. '"50 1 1720 NJ 0760 0 9Q10 *° 0867 0290 0230 2490 2000 0570 1591 0230 1660 C0320 0686 2229 2020 0686 0686 1591 1591 C0260 2540 C0260 2532 2620 2)60 2J70 1 3 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 5510 NEW AND USED CAR DEALERS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 1,669 IHFOM CODE 0170 1018 2090 0527 1290 0220 1536 1591 2170 2037 0540 •> 1790 I 0686 NJ 1631 Ł 9210 0 1060 0490 1842 1060 0680 2505 1591 1591 1520 0160 1860 1340 2310 0020 1591 1970 2040 0360 2420 2537 0230 2080 1520 0310 NOHfc CODE 05250 M0347 81650 80243 33640 06580 40430 M1693 H0256 M0630 17370 80056 M0900 45315 94220 M0238 15630 50495 31500 18260 74405 M0125 M0126 40297 20265 50742 90883 70870 01568 42685 52480 55460 11855 72085 A1003 07405 57740 80990 M2929 DESCRIPTION AMMONIA ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BISC2- PHOSPHORUS CARBON FORMALDEHYDE ANILINE ISOBUTYL ALCOHOL LEAD SOAP PROPANOL, 1- NAPHTHA-SOLVENT CARBON DISULFIDE MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04K ZINC SALT (1 = 1 MERCURY OXIDES WOODS ALCOHOL CADMIUM OXIDES NICKEL OXIDES ETHYL ALCOHOL CHLOROPRENE TRIMETHYLBENZENE LEAD MONOXIDE LEAD TETROXIDE IRON OXIDES ALUMINUM OXIDE NITRIC ACID GASOLINE, LEAD CONTENT UNKNOWN SULFURIC ACID ACETIC ACID LEAD OXIDES OXALIC ACID PHENOL BERYLLIUM OXIDES THALLIUM OXIDES TUNGSTEN OXIDES ANTIMONY TRICHLORIDE PHOSPHINE IRON OXIDE. YELLOW BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE 253 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 5510 OTHER TOTALS: EXPOSURE FACTOR 202 139 138 135 134 191 133 132 129 129 129 416 122 109 107 348 102 102 336 96 96 95 95 135 312 90 84 117 110 74 71 70 68 68 93 64 63 89 611 32,822 EXPOSURE INDEX .121 .083 .082 .080 .080 .114 .079 .079 .077 .077 .077 .249 .073 .065 .064 .208 .061 .061 .201 .057 .057 .056 .056 .080 .186 .053 .050 .070 .065 .044 .042 .041 .040 .040 .055 .038 .037 .053 .366 HAZARD WEIGHT 07 10 10 10 10 07 10 10 10 10 10 03 10 10 10 03 10 10 03 10 10 10 10 07 03 10 10 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 07 10 10 07 01 WEIGHTED INDEX .847 .832 .826 .808 .802 .801 .796 .790 .772 .772 .772 .747 .730 .653 .641 .625 .611 .611 .603 .575 .575 .569 .569 .566 .560 .539 .503 .490 .461 .443 .425 .419 .407 .407 .390 .383 .377 .373 .366 19.532 106.617 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 5540 GASOLINE SERVICE STATIONS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 424 16 IHFOM CODE 1340 2460 2360 2370 2590 0170 0374 1913 1430 2037 0874 1660 2490 > 0570 J, "20 Ł 2020 ^ 2505 1340 2310 5010 9050 0810 1371 1380 1740 1957 1591 1591 0686 2000 2611 9090 2532 1591 0310 9030 0686 1560 C0260 0710 2229 NOHS CODE 90880 73300 71640 71860 76720 05250 80517 32385 38580 M2829 24130 45930 73790 17490 46970 54790 74405 90883 70870 52138 84055 21190 36060 36955 47030 51705 83453 M1693 M0063 M0600 77150 17366 82880 91160 M2929 71055 80064 4Q987 07545 M0628 Ml 46 3 DESCRIPTION GASOLINE-LEADED TOLUENE TETRAETHYL LEAD TETRAKETHYL LEAD XYLENE AMMONIA SODIUM BORATE ETHYLENE GLYCOl HYDROGEN CHLORIDE PETROLEUM SPIRITS DICHLOROETHANE, 1.2- METHANOL ETHYLENE. TRICHLORO- CARBON TETRACHLORIDE TRICHLOROETHANE, 1,1.1- TETRACHLOROETHYLENE TRIMETHYLBENZENE GASOLINE, LEAD CONTENT UNKNOWN SULFURIC ACID OIL, LUBE SILICA. AMORPHOUS FUSED CYCLOHEXANE HEPTANE HEXANE HETHYLCYCLOHEXANE OCTANE LEAD NAPHTHENATE LEAD SOAP INORGANIC CHROMATES PARAFFIN ZINC CHLORIDE GRAPHITE PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE TALC POTASSIUM DICHROMATEfVI) 1SOPROPYL ALCOHOL ARSCMIC NAPHTHA IRON OXIDE, RTD EXPOSURE FACTOR 395 442 441 441 441 312 311 203 239 159 113 160 153 106 131 113 62 62 85 57 69 441 441 441 441 441 41 38 36 36 36 48 48 28 258 36 22 211 21 185 EXPOSURE INDEX 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .931 .042 .040 .040 .040 .735 .733 .478 .563 .375 .266 .377 .360 .250 .308 .266 .146 .146 .200 .134 .162 .040 .040 .040 .040 .040 .096 .089 .084 .084 .084 .113 .113 .066 .608 .084 .051 .497 . 049 .436 . 06 1 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 07 07 07 07 07 07 10 07 10 10 07 07 10 07 07 10 10 07 10 07 01 01 01 01 01 10 10 10 10 10 07 07 10 01 o; 10 01 10 01 07 WEIGHTE INDEX 9.316 7.297 7.280 7.280 7.280 5.150 5.134 4.787 3.945 3.750 2.665 2.641 2.525 2.500 2.162 .865 .462 .462 .403 .344 .139 .040 .040 .040 .040 1.040 .966 .896 .849 .849 .849 .792 .792 .660 .608 .594 .518 .497 .495 .436 .429 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 5540 GASOLINE SERVICE STATIONS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED- — EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 424 16 IIIFOM CODE C0320 0290 1060 0490 2085 1790 2092 0435 0686 C9020 9210 0460 1520 > 0430 ' 2140 Ł 0680 ro 1970 1060 1568 1538 0220 0926 0686 2090 0230 2037 0230 0760 0867 1591 1591 0230 2230 2682 1591 C2650 1591 0160 2620 NOHS CODE 09070 90320 31500 80247 58520 80056 59162 29930 M0900 90310 94220 13850 60990 13980 60440 16260 52480 n0238 41775 40910 06580 27615 68900 81650 A1433 M06JO 07310 20380 24003 42490 A1505 M2725 68295 80219 81000 83341 84544 20265 M0626 DESCRIPTION BENZENE ASPHALT ETHYL ALCOHOL CADMIUM SULFATE PHOSPHORIC ACID MOLYBDEHUM DISULFIDE PHOSPHORUS PENTASULFIDE ETHANOL, 2-BUTOXY- CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04), ZINC SALT (1:1) ASBESTOS MOODS BUTANOL IRON OXIDE. YELLOW BUTANOHE, 2- POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE CHLOROPRENE OXALIC ACID ALCOHOL KAOLIN ISOPHORONE ANILINE DIPHEHYLAMINE SODIUM CHROMATE(VI) PHOSPHORUS ANTIMONY SULFIDE NAPHTHA-SOLVENT AHTIMOHY CRESOL DICIILOROBENZENE, ORTHO- LEAD LEAD FUMARATE ANTIMONY DIALKYLDITHIOCARBAMATE SELENIUM TETRAETHYLTHIURAM DISULFIDE LEAD SUBOXIDE MOCA LEAD DIOXIDE ALUMINUM OXIDE > ZIRCONIUM OXIDE 148 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 5540 EXPOSURE EXPOSURE FACTOR INDEX 18 .042 17 .040 50 .117 15 .035 147 .346 48 .113 142 .334 141 .332 13 .030 13 .030 13 .030 126 .301 18 .042 124 .292 121 .285 12 .028 12 .028 39 .091 117 .275 106 .250 15 .035 34 .080 10 .023 10 .023 .021 .021 .021 .021 .021 .021 .018 .016 .018 .016 .018 .018 .018 24 .056 9 .021 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 03 10 01 03 01 01 10 10 10 01 07 01 01 10 10 03 01 01 07 03 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 03 07 WEIGHTEI INDEX . . . a • • . . , * . . • . . . . • ^ • m f m t t t • . , . . . _ . 424 400 353 353 346 339 334 332 306 306 306 301 297 292 285 283 283 275 275 250 247 240 235 235 212 212 212 212 212 212 188 188 188 188 188 188 188 169 148 OTHER TOTALS: 9,835 23.11A 110.811 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 7210 LAUNDRY, CLEANING. I GARMENT SERVICES DESCRIPTION NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 991 15 IHFOM CODE 2020 1913 0170 1018 1720 0735 1060 1591 2505 1970 2460 9050 > 2037 1 1660 Ł 2590 [j 0570 0527 0820 9090 1010 0867 1460 1280 2490 2000 0874 2611 0020 1560 0680 0868 1290 5010 C2580 0710 0374 1060 C0320 0360 0490 0760 NOHS CODE 54790 32385 05250 M0347 46970 94040 31500 M1693 74405 52490 73300 84055 M2829 45930 76720 17490 80243 21560 17366 25145 24003 38550 84314 73790 M0600 24130 77150 01568 40987 18260 24006 33640 52138 76445 M0628 80517 M0238 090/0 11855 15630 20380 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE ETHYLENE GLYCOL AMMONIA ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BIS(2- TRICHIOROETHANE, 1,1,1- COTTON ETHYL ALCOHOL LEAD SOAP TRIMETHYLBENZENE OXALIC ACID TOLUENE SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED PETROLEUM SPIRITS METHAHOL XYLENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE CARBON CYCLOHEXANOL GRAPHITE D10XANE, 1.4- DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHO- HYDROGEN FLUORIDE AMMONIUM FLUORIDE ETHYLEHE. TRICHLORO- PARAFFIN DICHLOROETHANE, 1.2- ZINC CHLORIDE ACETIC ACID ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL CHLOROPRENE DICHLOROBENZENE, PARA- FORMALDEHYDE OIL, LUBE VINYL CHLORIDE NAPHTHA SODIUM BORATE ALCOHOL BENZENE BERYLLIUM OXIDES CADMIUM OXIDES CRE50L EXPOSURE FACTOR 339 96 114 70 84 67 155 45 36 28 40 37 24 33 33 23 22 67 28 17 14 14 14 19 13 13 13 16 111 10 10 10 10 10 99 14 30 9 9 9 9 EXPOSURE INDEX .342 .096 .115 .070 .084 .067 .156 .045 .036 .028 .040 .037 .024 .033 .033 .023 .022 .067 .028 .017 .014 .014 .014 .019 .013 .013 .013 .016 .112 .010 .010 .010 .010 .010 .099 .014 .030 . 009 .009 . 009 .009 HAZARD WEIGHT 07 10 07 10 07 07 03 10 10 10 07 07 10 07 07 10 10 03 07 10 10 10 10 07 10 10 10 07 01 10 10 10 10 10 01 07 03 10 10 10 10 WEIGHTED INDEX 2.394 .968 .805 .706 .593 .473 .469 .454 .363 .282 .282 .261 .242 .233 .233 .232 .221 .202 .197 .171 .141 .141 .141 .134 .131 .131 .131 .113 .112 .100 .100 .100 .100 . 100 .099 .098 .090 .090 . 090 .090 .090 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 7210 LAUNDRY, CLEANING, i GARMENT SERVICES DESCRIPTION NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 991 15 IHFOM CODE 1591 1631 1842 5010 2080 2420 1591 1340 1369 1860 1280 2532 0230 1680 1630 C0120 0230 0230 1140 1591 2040 0847 2540 1040 2270 2570 0560 1520 1620 2310 2360 2370 2610 0686 1385 1591 1210 0505 2537 NOHS CODE 42685 45315 50495 52131 57740 72085 83453 90880 35960 50742 84180 82880 A1433 M0420 M0475 03800 07310 07405 23660 42490 55460 73750 74990 31470 69855 A1010 17460 40297 44035 70870 71640 71860 77190 M0063 37510 91160 32590 15705 A1003 LEAD OXIDES MERCURY OXIDES NICKEL OXIDES OIL, CUTTING PHOSPHINE THALLIUM OXIDES LEAD NAPHTHENATE GASOLINE-LEADED HEPTACHLOR NITRIC ACID AMMONIUM SILICOFLUORIDE PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER ANTIMONY SULFIDE BROMOMETHANE MERCURY-CONTAINING ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS ACRYLONITRILE ANTIMONY ANTIMONY TRICHLORIDE DIBROMOETHANE, 1.2- LEAD PHENOL DICHLORODIPHENYLTRICHLOROETHANE TURPENTINE ETHYL ACETATE STODDARD SOLVENT VANADIUM OXIDES CARBON MONOXIDE IRON OXIDES MANGANESE OXIDES SULFURIC ACID TETRAETHYL LEAD TETRAMETHYL LEAD ZINC OXIDE INORGANIC CHROMATES METHYL-2-PENTANONE, 4- IHORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS ETHYL ETHER CALCIUM CARBONATE TUNGSTEN OXIDES 176 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 7210 EXPOSURE FACTOR 11 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 10 66 66 62 6 60 6 59 57 8 EXPOSURE INDEX .009 .009 .009 .009 .009 .009 .009 .009 .008 .008 .008 .011 .007 .007 .007 .007 .007 .007 .007 .007 .007 .007 .010 .066 .066 .009 .009 .009 .009 .009 .009 .009 .062 .006 .060 .006 .059 .057 .008 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 01 01 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 01 10 01 10 01 01 07 WEIGHTED INDEX .090 .090 .090 .090 .090 .090 .090 .090 .080 .080 .080 .077 .070 .070 .070 .070 .070 .070 .070 .070 .070 .070 .070 .066 .066 .063 .063 .063 .06) .063 .063 .063 .062 .060 .060 .060 .059 .057 .056 OTHER TOTALS: 3.226 3.232 16.758 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 7340 SERVICES TO BUILDINGS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOUS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS ---NOHS SURVEYED--- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 847 1 K) (-• Ln IHFOM CODE 9050 1913 2611 1970 0170 0868 0867 1430 2037 1030 2540 1595 1190 1720 0020 1680 1140 2000 2590 C0120 0570 0874 1060 1290 2586 1280 0510 0374 0790 0935 0540 0670 1810 0490 9090 1560 1660 2490 90)0 2229 1060 NOHS CODE 84055 32385 77150 52480 05250 24006 24003 38580 M2829 04980 74990 09318 32550 46970 01568 M0420 23660 110600 76720 03800 17490 24130 MO 2 38 33640 76610 M0579 15730 80517 112865 M2705 17370 18500 49600 82783 17366 40987 45930 7)790 71055 MI46) 31500 DESCRIPTION SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED ETHYLENE GLYCOL ZINC CHLORIDE OXALIC ACID AMMONIA DICHLOROBEMZENE, PARA- DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHO- HYDROGEN CHLORIDE PETROLEUM SPIRITS ETHANOLAI1INE TURPENTINE LINDANE ETHYLENE OXIDE TRICHLOROETHANE, 1,1,1- ACETIC ACID BROMOMETHANE DIBROMOETHANE. 1,2- PARAFFIN XYLENE ACRYLONITRILE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE DICHLOROETHANE, 1,2- ALCOHOL FORMALDEHYDE WARFARIH CALCIUM FLUORIDE CALCIUM CYANAMIDE SODIUM BORATE CALCIUM CYANIDE DIBPOMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE, CARBON DISULFIDE CHLOROFORM NAPHTHALENE CADMIUM CYAHIDE GRAPHITE I50PROPYL ALCOHOL METHANOL EFHYLENE, TRICHLORO- T AL C IRON OXIDE, RED ETHYL ALCOHOL 1,2- EXPOSURE FACTOR 543 365 334 329 442 296 264 349 196 406 159 134 75 89 85 57 57 55 75 50 50 50 163 48 66 45 45 60 57 38 38 38 38 38 54 377 49 48 46 45 89 EXPOSURE INDEX .641 .430 .394 .388 .521 .349 .311 .412 .231 .479 .187 .158 .088 .105 .100 .067 .067 .064 .088 .059 .059 .059 .192 .056 .077 .053 .053 .070 .067 .044 .044 .044 .044 .044 .063 .445 .057 .056 .054 .05) 105 HAZARD WEIGHT 07 10 10 10 07 10 10 07 10 03 07 07 10 07 07 10 10 10 07 10 10 10 03 10 07 10 10 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 07 01 07 07 07 07 03 WEIGHTED INDEX 4.487 4.309 3.943 3.884 3.652 3.494 3.116 2.884 2.314 1.438 1.314 1.107 .885 .735 .702 .672 .672 .649 .619 .590 .590 .590 .577 .566 .545 .531 .5}1 .495 .471 .448 .448 .448 .448 .448 .446 .445 .404 .396 . 390 .)71 .)15 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 7340 SERVICES TO BUILDINGS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS ---NOHS SURVEYED--- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 847 15 IHFOM CODE 1710 0880 0790 0872 1515 0850 2720 2460 0645 2190 1616 0680 > C2580 I 9210 Ł 1797 Ł 0191 9050 0160 0435 1369 2140 1630 0847 2216 2235 0230 1860 2040 0527 2110 0871 2260 0675 2425 1989 2228 2427 0522 2310 •NOHS CODE M0421 24150 68950 24100 40030 M0377 23360 73300 29010 24390 80046 18260 76445 94220 48910 M1226 M1532 20265 29930 35960 60440 M0475 73750 65070 68695 07405 50742 55460 80243 59230 24095 69070 M0419 28880 54160 67530 71900 15800 70870 DESCRIPTION CHLOROMETHANE DICHLOROETHYL ETHER* 2,2- SODIUM CYANIDE DICHLORO-5.5-DIMETHYLHYDANTOIN, 1,3- IODINE PHOSPHORIC ACID, 2,2-DICHLOROVINYL DIMETHYL ESTER PHOSPHOROTHIOIC ACID, 0,0-DIETHYL 0-C2-ISOPROPYL-6-METHYL-4- TOLUENE EPICHLOROHYDRIN DICHLOROPROPANE, 1,2- D1ETHYL MERCAPTOSUCCINATE, 0,0- DIMETHYLDITHIOPHOSPHATE OF CHLOROPRENE VINYL CHLORIDE UOODS MORPHOLINE ACETIC ACID, PENTYL ESTER SILICA GEL ALUMINUM OXIDE ETHANOL, 2-BUTOXY- HEPTACHLOR POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE MERCURY-CONTAINING ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS DICHLOROOIPHENYLTRICHLOROETHANE PYRETHRUM SILICON ANTIMONY TRICHLORIDE NITRIC ACID PHENOL CARBON PHTHALIC ANHYDRIDE DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE SODIUM HYDROXIDE TRICHLORONITROMETHANE ENDOSULFAN PENTACHLOROPHENOL ROTENONE TETRAMETHYLTHIURAM DISULFIDE CAMPHOR SULFURIC ACID EXPOSURE FACTOR 38 38 38 258 258 78 77 33 21 57 57 17 17 17 55 159 20 45 134 13 122 12 12 16 104 10 10 10 10 13 89 85 12 12 12 12 12 10 10 EXPOSURE INDEX .044 .044 .044 .304 .304 .092 .090 .038 .024 .067 .067 .020 .020 .020 .064 .187 .023 .053 .158 .015 .144 .014 .014 .018 .122 .011 .011 .011 .011 .015 .105 .100 .014 .014 .014 .014 .014 .011 .011 HAZARD WEIGHT 07 07 07 01 01 03 03 07 10 03 03 10 10 10 03 01 07 03 01 10 01 10 10 07 01 10 10 10 10 07 01 01 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 MEIGHTEI INDEX .314 .314 .314 .304 .304 .276 .272 .272 .247 .201 .201 .200 .200 .200 .194 .187 .165 .159 .158 .153 .144 .141 .141 .132 .122 .118 .118 .118 .118 .107 .105 .100 .099 .099 .099 .099 .099 .082 .082 120 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 7340 OTHER TOTALS: 8,467 9.9«2 59.171 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOUS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 7390 MISC. BUSINESS SERVICES 6,958 IHFOM CODE 2037 9050 2000 2590 2490 2460 1913 2611 C0320 0570 0527 0290 > 1660 I 1720 M 9Q90 ^ 0760 2020 2532 5010 0170 0874 1591 0867 1591 9210 1060 2170 C9020 0374 0540 2037 0686 2540 1340 0606 1290 C0260 1591 2505 1340 0230 NOHS CODE M2829 84055 M0600 76720 73790 73300 32385 77150 09070 17490 80243 90320 45930 46970 17366 20380 54790 82880 52138 05250 24130 83453 24003 M1693 94220 31500 M0256 90310 80517 17370 M0630 81876 74990 90880 80064 33640 07555 84546 74405 90883 07310 DESCRIPTION PETROLEUM SPIRITS SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED PARAFFIN XYLENE ETHYLENE. TRICHLORO- TOLUENE ETHYLENE GLYCOL ZINC CHLORIDE BENZENE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE CARBON ASPHALT METHANOL TRICHIOROETHANE, 1,1,1- GRAPHITE CRESOL TETRACHLOROETHYLENE PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER OIL, LUBE AMMONIA DICHLOROETHANE, 1,2- LEAD NAPHTHENATE DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHO- LEAD SOAP WOODS ETHYL ALCOHOL PROPANOL, 1- ASBESTOS SODIUM BORATE CARBON DISULFIDE NAPHTHA-SOLVENT CHROMIC ACID, LEADC2+) SALT (1:1) TURPENTINE GASOLINE-LEADED POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI) FORMALDEHYDE ARSfcNIC OXIDES LEAD SUIFATE IRII1ETHYLBENZENE GASOLINE, LEAD CONTENT UNKNOWN ANHflONY EXPOSURE FACTOR 1,011 1,237 824 1,156 1,111 1,095 735 732 672 672 663 640 903 888 866 590 833 826 555 790 549 540 502 492 486 1,587 474 472 668 467 465 456 645 435 432 431 423 423 410 410 408 EXPOSURE INDEX .145 .177 .118 .166 .159 .157 .105 .105 .096 .096 .095 .091 .129 .127 .124 .084 .119 .118 .079 .113 .078 .077 .072 .070 .069 .228 .068 .067 .096 .067 .066 .065 .092 .062 .062 .061 . 060 .060 .058 .058 .058 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 07 10 07 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 07 07 10 07 07 10 07 10 10 10 10 10 03 10 10 07 10 10 10 07 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WEIGHTE INDEX .453 .244 .194 .162 .117 .101 .056 .052 .965 .965 .952 .919 .908 .893 .871 .847 .838 .830 .797 .794 .789 .776 .721 .707 .698 .684 .681 .678 .672 .671 .668 .655 .648 .625 .620 .619 .607 .607 .589 .589 .586 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 7390 MISC. BUSINESS SERVICES OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS ---NOHS SURVEYED- — EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 6,958 45 IHFOM CODE 0230 1591 1018 0686 1591 1591 1430 1591 1591 0020 1591 1591 > 2090 I 1060 |°, 0220 5 5010 0490 2229 1591 2360 2370 1842 1536 1860 2620 9030 2432 2310 2432 2432 1280 1631 1190 2080 1520 0160 1970 0360 2420 NOHS CODE A1433 42490 M0347 M0063 84544 42685 38580 M0125 M0126 01568 81000 81677 81650 M0238 06580 52131 15630 H1463 91160 71640 71860 50495 40430 50742 M0626 71055 110877 70870 7325S 82157 81945 45315 32550 57740 40297 20265 52480 11855 72085 DESCRIPTION ANTIMONY SULFIDE LEAD ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE. B1SC2- INORGANIC CHROMATES LEAD DIOXIDE LEAD OXIDES HYDROGEN CHLORIDE LEAD MONOXIDE LEAD TETROXIDE ACETIC ACID LEAD SUBOXIDE LEAD TRIOXIDE PHOSPHORUS ALCOHOL ANILINE OIL, CUTTING CADMIUM OXIDES IRON OXIDE. RED INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS TETRAETHYL LEAD TETRAMETHYL LEAD NICKEL OXIDES ISOnUTYL ALCOHOL NITRIC ACID ZIRCONIUM OXIDE TALC STANNIC OXIDE SULFURIC ACID TIN OXIDES STAIINOUS OXIDE POTASSIUM BIFLUORIDE MERCURY OXIDES ETHYLEHE OXIDE PHOSPHINE IRON OXIDES ALUMINUM OXIDE OXALIC ACID BERYLLIUM OXIDES THALLIUM OXIDES 331 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 7390 EXPOSURE FACTOR 406 406 403 390 390 380 542 370 370 517 359 359 352 1,139 477 332 321 448 309 435 435 299 298 294 406 392 390 386 386 386 259 227 225 225 313 721 215 210 210 EXPOSURE INDEX .058 .058 .057 .056 .056 .054 .077 .053 .053 .074 .051 .051 .050 .163 .068 .047 .046 .064 .044 .062 .062 .042 .042 .042 .058 .056 .056 .055 .055 .055 .037 .032 .032 .032 .044 .103 .030 .030 .030 HAZARD UEIGHT 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 10 10 07 10 10 10 03 07 10 10 07 10 07 07 10 10 10 07 07 07 07 07 07 10 10 10 10 07 03 10 10 10 UEIGHTEI INDEX .583 .583 .579 .560 .560 .546 .545 .531 .531 .520 .515 .515 .505 .491 .479 .477 .461 .450 .444 .437 .437 .429 .428 .422 .40B .394 .392 .388 .3Bfi .386 .372 .324 .321 .321 .3H .3H .300 .301 .30] OTHER TOTALS: 84,733 12.017 65.384 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX UITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 7530 AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR SHOPS IHFOM NOHS DESCRIPTION 120 VO IHFOM CODE 2037 2611 1591 0686 5010 1591 9030 0374 2590 1591 1591 9090 9050 0230 0230 1591 1720 0490 1842 2532 2460 1591 1591 1591 1631 0686 2229 2620 0570 1913 1520 2490 1591 0290 2517 C0260 1591 2432 2432 2432 0636 NOHS CODE M2829 77150 42685 M0063 52138 91160 71055 80517 76720 M0125 MO 126 17366 84055 A1433 07310 42490 46970 15630 50495 82880 73300 81000 81677 84544 45315 SIG76 M1463 M0626 17490 32385 40297 73790 83453 90320 A1003 07555 84546 n0877 71253 82157 M0900 1,1,1- PETROLEUn SPIRITS ZINC CHLORIDE LEAD OXIDES INORGANIC CHROMATES OIL, LUBE INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS TALC SODIUM BORATE XYLENE LEAD MONOXIDE LEAD TETROXIDE GRAPHITE SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED AHTIMOHY SULFIDE ANTIMONY LEAD TRICHLOROETHANE, CADMIUM OXIDES NICKEL OXIDES PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER TOLUENE LEAD SUBOXIDE LEAD TRIOXIDE LEAD DIOXIDE MERCURY OXIDES CllScriC ACID. LEfD(2+) IRON OXIDE, RED ZIRCONIUM OXIDE CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ETHYLENE GLYCOL IRON OXIDES ETHYIENE, TRICHLORO- LEAD HAPHTHENATE ASPHALT TUNGSTEN OXIDES ARSENIC OXIDES LEAD SULFA1E STANNIC OXIDE TIN OXIDES S1ANNOUS OXIDE CHROMIC ACID (H2CR04), ZINC SALT (1=1) (1:1) EXPOSURE FACTOR 57 33 29 28 28 28 38 36 33 22 22 30 29 20 20 20 27 18 18 25 24 16 16 16 15 15 21 20 14 14 20 2C 13 13 18 12 12 16 16 16 1 1 EXPOSURE INDEX .475 .275 .241 .233 .233 .233 .316 .300 .275 .183 .183 .250 .241 .166 .166 .166 .225 .150 .150 .208 .200 .133 .133 .133 .125 .125 .175 .166 .116 .116 .166 .166 . lua .108 .150 . 100 . 100 . 131 . Ill . 131 .091 HAZARD WEIGHTED WEIGHT INDEX 10 4.750 10 2.750 10 2.416 10 2.333 10 2.333 10 2.333 07 2.216 07 2.100 07 1.925 10 10 07 07 10 10 10 07 10 10 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 07 07 10 10 07 07 III 10 07 10 10 .833 .833 .750 .691 .666 .666 .666 .575 .500 .500 .458 .400 .333 .333 .333 .250 .250 .225 .166 .166 .166 .166 .166 .001 .083 .050 .000 .000 07 .911 07 .911 07 .931 10 .916 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 7530 AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR SHOPS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS — NOHS SURVEYED--- EMPLOYMEHT FIRMS 120 9 > 1 (O to o IHFOM CODE 0360 2080 2420 2495 C9020 2020 C0320 1790 0874 1750 2570 0560 1620 2000 0335 1290 1970 0686 1430 0670 1060 0160 1300 5010 1842 0020 0170 9010 1060 1560 2540 1591 1591 C0260 1591 0310 0926 02? 0 1520 NOHS CODE 11855 57740 72085 73770 90310 54790 09070 80056 24130 80105 A1010 17460 44035 M0600 11280 33640 52480 80064 38580 18500 M0238 20265 33245 52131 84269 01568 05250 67915 31500 40987 74990 A1297 M0751 07545 80252 M2929 27615 06580 80990 DESCRIPTION BERYLLIUM OXIDES PHOSPHIHE THALLIUM OXIDES TRICHLOROETHANE, 1.1.2- ASBESTOS TETRACHLOROETHYLENE BENZENE MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE DICHLOROETHANE, 1.2- METHYL ETHYL KETONE PEROXIDE VANADIUM OXIDES CARBON MONOXIDE MANGANESE OXIDES PARAFFIN BENZOYL PEROXIDE FORMALDEHYDE OXALIC ACID POTASSIUM DICHROMATE(VI) HYDROGEN CHLORIDE CHLOROFORM ALCOHOL ALUMINUM OXIDE FIBERGLASS OIL, CUTTIHG NICKEL OXIDE ACETIC ACID AMMONIA SAND ETHYL ALCOHOL ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL TURPENTINE LEAD CARBONATE, BASIC LEADED ZINC OXIDE ARSF.HIC LEAD CARBONATE BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE DIPHENYLAMINE ANILINE IRON OXIDE, YELLOW 179 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 7530 EXPOSURE FACTOR 11 11 11 11 10 13 9 28 8 8 11 11 11 7 10 7 7 7 9 6 20 20 8 5 5 7 7 7 15 42 6 4 4 4 4 39 13 5 5 EXPOSURE INDEX .091 .091 .091 .091 .083 .108 .075 .233 .066 .066 .091 .091 .091 .058 .083 .058 .058 .058 .075 .050 .166 .166 .066 .041 .041 .058 .058 .058 .125 .350 .050 .033 .033 .033 .033 .325 .108 .041 .041 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 10 10 10 10 07 10 03 10 10 07 07 07 10 07 10 10 10 07 10 03 03 07 10 10 07 07 07 03 01 07 10 10 10 10 01 03 07 07 OTHER TOTALS: 1,889 15.677 .916 .916 .916 .916 .833 .758 .750 .699 .666 .666 .641 .641 .641 .583 .583 .583 .583 .583 .525 .500 .499 .499 .466 .41 .41 .40 .40 .40 .37 .35 .35 .33 .33 .33 .33 .32 .32 .29 .29 95.50 image: ------- 1C INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 690 MISC. REPAIR SHOPS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 1,032 13 IHFOM CODE 0230 1591 0230 9050 2229 2620 5010 2037 '1591 2490 2532 5010 1720 > 0160 ' 2020 M 9090 t- 2590 0874 0570 2611 1520 2460 2170 0490 1842 0867 C0320 1591 0760 2037' 0540 2080 1631 0360 2420 0926 0686 1591 C9020 1660 0374 NOHS CODE 07310 42490 A1433 84055 Ml «6 3 M0626 52138 M2829 83453 73790 82880 52131 46970 20265 54790 17366 76720 24130 17490 77150 40297 73300 M0256 15630 50495 24003 09070 42685 20380 M0630 17370 57740 45315 11855 72085 27615 M0063 91160 90310 45930 80517 DESCRIPTION ANTIMONY LEAD ANTIMONY SULFIDE SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED IRON OXIDE, RED ZIRCONIUM OXIDE OIL, LUBE PETROLEUM SPIRITS LEAD NAPHTHENATE ETHYLEHE. TRICHLORO- PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRITOLYL ESTER OIL, CUTTING TRICHLOROETHANE, 1,1,1- ALUI1INUM OXIDE TETRACHLOROETHYLENE GRAPHITE XYLENE D1CHLOROETHANE, 1,2- CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ZINC CHLORIDE IRON OXIDES TOLUENE PROPANOL, 1- CADMIUM OXIDES NICKEL OXIDES DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHO- BEHZEIIE LEAD OXIDES CRESOL NAPHTHA-SOLVENT CARBON DISULFIDE PHOSPH1NE MERCURY OXIDES BERYLLIUM OXIDES THALLIUM OXIDES DIPHENYlAniNE INORGANIC CHROMATES INORGANIC LEAD COMPOUNDS ASBESTOS MEIHAMOl SODIUM BORATE EXPOSURE FACTOR 641 641 638 859 782 748 444 440 381 516 449 275 323 751 294 282 241 146 142 137 190 190 132 130 128 126 125 124 121 120 120 120 117 116 116 380 112 112 102 130 130 EXPOSURE INDEX .621 .621 .618 .832 .757 .724 .430 .426 .369 .500 .435 .266 .312 .727 .284 .273 .233 .141 .137 .132 .184 .184 .127 .125 .124 .122 .121 .120 .117 .116 .116 .116 .113 .112 .112 .368 . 108 . 108 .098 . 125 . 125 HAZARD WEIGHTED WEIGHT INDEX 10 (.211 10 6.211 10 6.182 07 5.826 07 5.304 07 5.073 10 4.302 10 4.263 10 3.691 07 3.500 07 3.045 10 2.664 07 2.190 03 2.183 07 07 07 10 10 10 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 03 10 .994 .912 .634 .414 .375 .327 .288 .288 .279 .259 .240 .220 .211 .201 .172 .162 .162 .162 .133 .124 . 124 . 104 .085 10 1.085 10 988 07 .881 07 .881 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 7690 MISC. REPAIR SHOPS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS IHFOM CODE 0220 2540 0560 1430 2432 2570 1620 9030 1591 9010 1030 2537 2000 > 1842 NJ 1°'° fo 2537 to 1913 1280 0290 1060 1790 0310 1591 2240 0020 0860 0620 0820 0830 2190 0924 1790 1290 0170 0686 1018 2110 9210 0640 NOHS CODE 06580 74990 17460 38580 73253 A1010 44035 71055 M0751 111806 04980 80230 M0600 84269 M0238 A1003 32385 81945 90320 31500 80056 M2929 M1693 68748 01568 M4016 18190 21560 21660 24390 25820 48628 33640 05250 81876 M0347 59230 94220 18340 1,032 13 DESCRIPTION ANILINE TURPENTINE CARBON MONOXIDE HYDROGEN CHLORIDE TIN OXIDES VANADIUM OXIDES K.ANGANESE OXIDES TALC LEADED ZINC OXIDE SILICA FLOUR ETHANOLAMINE TUNGSTEN CARBIDE PARAFFIN NICKEL OXIDE ALCOHOL TUNGSTEN OXIDES ETHYLENE GLYCOL POTASSIUM BIFLUORIDE ASPHALT ETHYL ALCOHOL MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE BARIUM PETROLEUM SULFONATE LEAD SOAP SILVER OXIDES ACETIC ACID PENTANONE. 4-HYDROXY-4-METHYL-. 2- CHLOROBENZEHE CYCLOIIEXANOL CYCLOHEXAHONE DICHLOROPROPANE. 1,2- DIMETHYL-4-HEPTANONE. 2,6- HOLYBDENUM OXIDES FORMALDEHYDE AMMONIA CHROMIC ACID, LEADC2*) SALT (1:1) ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE, BIS(2- PHIHALIC ANHYDRIDE WOODS CHLORINE 221 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 7690 EXPOSURE FACTOR 126 122 120 120 US 116 116 115 79 112 260 110 75 63 196 80 56 55 54 179 167 460 41 5ft 57 12ft 120 120 120 120 120 116 34 45 30 28 38 26 33 EXPOSURE INDEX .122 .118 .116 .116 .114 .112 .112 .111 .076 .108 .251 .106 .072 .061 .191 .077 .054 .053 .052 .173 .161 .445 .039 .056 .055 .124 .116 .116 .116 .116 .116 .112 .032 .043 .029 .027 . 036 .025 .031 HAZARD UEIGHT 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 10 07 03 07 10 10 03 07 10 10 10 03 03 01 10 07 07 03 03 03 03 03 03 03 10 07 10 10 07 10 07 WEIGHTED INDEX .854 .827 .813 .813 .800 .786 .786 .780 .765 .759 .755 .746 .726 .610 .575 .542 .542 .532 .523 .520 .485 .445 .397 .393 .386 .372 .348 .348 .348 .348 .348 .337 .329 .305 .290 .271 .257 .251 .223 OTHER TOTALS: 21,713 20.918 124.887 image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 8020 OFFICES OF DENTISTS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS ---NOHS SURVEYED--- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 22 IHFOM CODE 1774 9050 0020 2310 0374 2000 1591 2037 0230 1913 1290 1860 1970 > 2040 ' 0527 K 0170 oj 0335 0522 9090 1310 1660 2460 2490 2540 2590 1060 1953 2135 1060 0820 1797 1560 0710 0191 2127 0575 2085 2215 2270 2610 2140 NOHS CODE 47700 84055 01568 70870 80517 M0600 M1693 M2829 07405 32385 33640 50742 52480 55460 80243 05250 11280 15800 17366 33720 45930 73300 73790 74990 76720 31500 51118 80221 M0238 21560 48910 40987 M0628 M1226 M4257 17683 58520 63550 6S955 77190 60440 DESCRIPTION METHYL METHACRYLATE SILICA. AMORPHOUS FUSED ACETIC ACID SULFURIC ACID SODIUM BORATE PARAFFIN LEAD SOAP PETROLEUM SPIRITS ANTIMONY TRICHLORIDE ETHYLENE GLYCOL FORMALDEHYDE NITRIC ACID OXALIC ACID PHENOL CARBON AMMONIA BENZOYL PEROXIDE CAMPHOR GRAPHITE FORMIC ACID METHANOL TOLUENE ETHYLENE. TRICHLORO- TURPENTINE XYLENE ETHYL ALCOHOL NITROUS OXIDE ETHYLENE. TETRAFLUORO-, POLYMER ALCOHOL CYCLOHEXANOL MORPHOLIHE ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL NAPHTHA ACETIC ACID. PENTYL ESTER PLASTER CELLULOSE PHOSPHORIC ACID PROPYLENE OXIDE SIUDDASD SOLVENT ZINC OXIDE POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE EXPOSURE FACTOR 13 13 1 1 1 6 12 10 3 6 6 6 13 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 EXPOSURE INDEX .590 .590 .500 .500 .500 .272 .272 .272 .272 .272 .272 .272 .272 .272 .272 .272 .272 .272 .272 .272 .272 .272 .272 .272 .272 .545 .454 .136 .272 .272 .272 .590 .272 .272 .272 .272 .272 .272 .272 .272 .227 HAZARD WEIGHT 07 07 07 07 07 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 03 03 07 03 03 03 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 WEIGHTED INDEX 4.136 4.136 3.500 3.500 3.500 2.727 2.727 2.727 2.727 2.727 2.727 2.727 2.727 2.727 2.727 1.909 1.909 .909 .909 .909 .909 .909 .909 .909 .909 1.636 1.363 .954 .818 .818 .818 .590 .272 .272 .272 .272 .272 .272 .272 .272 .227 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS ---NOHS SURVEYED—- SIC INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 8020 OFFICES OF DENTISTS 22 2 IHFOM NOHS EXPOSURE EXPOSURE HAZARD WEIGHTED CODE CODE DESCRIPTION FACTOR INDEX WEIGHT INDEX 1040 31470 ETHYL ACETATE 3 .136 01 .136 1210 32590 ETHYL ETHER 3 .136 01 .136 43 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 8020 OTHER TOTALS: 294 13.336 74.804 I K> M image: ------- SIC INDUSTRY 8060 HOSPITALS DESCRIPTION OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED. SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS NOHS SURVEYED EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 21.955 IHFOM CODE 1290 0867 1060 0868 0374 1591 2037 0020 1369 1190 1430 0170 _ 1913 ^ 1720 ,oC0320 to 1310 01 0570 1660 2000 1060 2490 0874 2460 2590 2540 0760 2170 2020 9030 2037 0540 2040 1560 9050 9090 1970 2611 0220 2J10 0522 0670 NOHS CODE 33640 24003 31500 24006 80517 M1693 M2829 01568 35960 A1719 38580 05250 32385 46970 09070 33720 17490 45930 M0600 M0238 73790 24130 73300 76720 74990 20380 M0256 54790 71055 M0630 17370 55460 40987 84055 17366 52480 77150 06580 70870 15*00 18500 DESCRIPTION FORMALDEHYDE DICHLOROBENZENE, ORTHO- ETHYL ALCOHOL DICHLOROBENZEHE, PARA- SODIUM BORATE LEAD SOAP PETROLEUM SPIRITS ACETIC ACID HEPTACHLOR E7HYLENE OXIDE CONDENSATE HYDROGEN CHLORIDE • AMMONIA EIHYLEHE GLYCOL TRICHLOROETHANE. 1.1,1- BEMZENE FORMIC ACID CARBON TETRACHLORIDE METHANOl PARAFFIN ALCOHOL ETHYLENE, TRICHLORO- DICHLOROETHANE, 1.2- TOLUENE XYLENE TURPENTINE CRESUL PROPANOL, 1- TETRACHLOROETHYLENE TALC NAPHTHA-SOLVENT CARBON DISULFIDE PHENOL ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL SILICA, AMORPHOUS FUSED GRAPHITE OXALIC ACID ZINC CHLORIDE AHIUNE SULFURIC ACID CM1PHIIR CIILOROfORM EXPOSURE FACTOR 4,264 3.968 12.786 3,592 4.899 3,297 3,202 4.542 2,971 2,926 4.086 3,569 2,448 3,330 2.117 3,020 2.067 2,839 1,789 5,944 2,303 1,527 2,155 2,069 1,746 1,215 1,197 1,711 1,627 1,086 1,086 1,074 10.595 1.440 1.235 850 810 1.151 995 965 673 EXPOSURE INDEX .194 .180 .582 .163 .223 .150 .145 .206 .135 .133 .186 .162 .111 .151 .096 .137 .094 .129 .081 .270 .104 .069 .098 .094 .079 .055 .054 .077 .074 .049 .049 .048 .482 .065 .056 .038 .036 .052 .0 image: ------- 1C INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION 060 HOSPITALS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY UEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS —NOHS SURVEYED--- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS IHFOM CODE 1860 0871 1030 0527 2260 2532 0040 0290 0820 2085 1470 1010 2140 > 0860 ' 0515 K 0900 Ł 0830 0230 0620 2190 0924 0686 9210 C9020 1953 0710 1646 1285 1040 1190 5010 0435 1532 1730 1790 1210 0191 0735 0686 NOHS CODE 50742 24095 04980 80243 69070 82880 02820 90320 21560 58520 38605 25145 60440 M4016 15743 24425 21660 07405 18190 24390 25820 80064 94220 90310 51118 M0628 46210 33565 31470 32550 52138 29930 40380 47270 80056 32590 M1226 94040 MO 061 21.955 43 DESCRIPTION NITRIC ACID DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE ETHANOLAMINE CARBON SODIUM HYDROXIDE . PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER ACETONE ASPHALT CYCLOHEXANOL PHOSPHORIC ACID HYDROGEN PEROXIDE DIOXANE. 1.4- POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE PENTANONE. 4-HYDROXY-4-HETHYL-. 2- CALCIUM HYDROXIDE DICHLOROTETRAFLUOROETHANE CYCLOHEXANONE ANTIMONY TRICHLORIDE CHLOROBENZENE DICHLOROPROPANE. 1,2- DIMETHYL-4-HEPTANONE, 2.6- POTASSIUM DICHROMATECVI) MOODS ASBESTOS NITROUS OXIDE NAPHTHA METHOXYCHLOR TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE ETHYL ACETATE ETHYLENE OXIDE OIL. LUBE ETHANOL, 2-BUTOXY- ISOPENTYL ALCOHOL DICHLOROMETHANE MOLYBDENUM DISULFIDE ETHYL ETHER ACETIC ACID, PENTYL ESTER COTTON INORGANIC CHROMATES 444 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 8060 EXPOSURE FACTOR (32 5.827 1.922 473 4.649 654 4.329 431 1,378 3,992 3,850 370 3.696 1.156 3.457 3.452 1.104 326 1.086 1,089 1,086 312 295 274 867 2,574 860 2,550 2,535 244 233 2.303 228 2.220 714 2.044 1.869 268 186 EXPOSURE INDEX .028 .265 .087 .021 .211 .029 .197 .019 .062 .181 .175 .016 .168 .052 .157 .157 .050 .014 .049 .049 .049 .014 .013 .012 .039 .117 .039 .116 .115 .011 .010 .104 .010 .101 .032 .093 .085 .012 .008 HAZARD WEIGHT 10 01 03 10 01 07 01 10 03 01 01 10 01 03 01 01 03 10 03 03 03 10 10 10 03 01 03 01 01 10 10 01 10 01 03 01 01 07 10 UEIGHTED INDEX .287 .265 .262 .215 .211 .208 .197 .196 .188 .181 .175 .168 .168 .157 .157 .157 .150 .148 .148 .148 .148 .142 .134 .124 .118 .117 .117 .116 .115 .111 .106 .104 .103 .101 .097 .093 .085 .085 .084 OTHER TOTALS' 220.451 9.866 46.979 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION MEDICAL AND DENTAL LABORATORIES DESCRIPTION ---NOHS SURVEYED--- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 111 3 IHFOM CODE 2590 0020 1660 1430 I860 1290 1532 0170 2310 0374 2475 2120 0790 > 0760 ' 1913 M 20.40 -j 1190 0867 0868 1369 C0320 0570 0510 0670 1970 0686 0490 1842 1230 1631 1310 2460 1060 1290 1631 0790 0790 0902 0800 1 image: ------- OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF STATISTICAL STUDIES AND ANALYSIS HEALTH INSPECTION PLAN TOP RANKED SUBSTANCES IN NOHS INVENTORY BY WEIGHTED INDEX WITH NOHS ESTABLISHMENT CHARACTERISTICS INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION B070 MEDICAL AND DENTAL LABORATORIES DESCRIPTION —NOHS SURVEYED—- EMPLOYMENT FIRMS 111 3 IHFOM CODE 2221 0790 2532 1620 0790 0790 0790 2683 2532 0790 2240 0790 2240 > 1060 ' 0530 M 0527 co 2260 0030 0515 2085 2065 0850 0932 1560 1791 1791 2140 0505 1522 0690 1631 1591 0040 1030 2042 1620 2240 1591 13*0 NOHS CODE 67220 68950 74600 80455 80720 81838 81950 82226 82860 82888 82969 83663 84064 M0238 17367 80243 69070 02740 15743 58520 M0373 M0377 26420 40987 80790 81898 60440 15705 33160 82232 84274 84473 02820 04980 56950 60490 80142 M1693 28110 RESORCINOL SODIUM CYANIDE TRIORTHOCRESYL PHOSPHATE MANGANESE GLYCEROPHOSPHATE ZINC CYANIDE GOLD CYANIDE GOLD POTASSIUM CYANIDE BUTYLATED HYDROXYTOLUENES PHOSPHORIC ACID. TRITOLYL ESTER AMMONIUM CYANIDE SILVER SODIUM CYANIDE COBALT CYANIDE POTASSIUM SILVER CYANIDE ALCOHOL CARBON DIOXIDE CARBON SODIUM HYDROXIDE ACETIC ANHYDRIDE CALCIUM HYDROXIDE PHOSPHORIC ACID METHYL 3-(DIMETHOXYPHOSPHINYLOXY) CROTONATE PHOSPHORIC1 ACID. 2,2-DICHLOROVIHYL DIMETHYL ESTER PHOSPHORIC ACID. 1.2-DIBROMO-2.2-DICHLOROETHYL DIMETHYL ESTE ISOPROPYL ALCOHOL AMMONIUM MOLYBDATE(VI) MOLYBDIC ACID POTASSIUM HYDROXIDE CALCIUM CARBONATE FERRIC CHLORIDE CHROMIC POTASSIUM SULFATE MERCURIC CHLORIDE LEAD HITRATE ACETONE ETHANOLAMINE PHEMYLENEDIAMINE. PARA- POTASSIUM PERMANGANATE SILVER NITRATE LEAD SOAP HYDRAZINE EXPOSURE FACTOR 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 27 80 6 53 7 48 48 15 15 15 45 15 15 33 31 30 3 3 3 24 7 3 3 3 2 2 EXPOSURE INDEX .135 .135 .135 .135 .135 .135 .135 .135 .135 .135 .135 .135 .135 .243 .720 .054 .477 .063 .432 .432 .135 .135 .135 .405 .135 .135 .297 .279 .270 .027 .027 .027 .216 .063 .027 .027 .027 .018 .018 HAZARD WEIGHT 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 03 01 10 01 07 01 01 03 03 03 01 03 03 01 01 01 10 10 10 01 03 07 07 07 10 10 WEIGHTED INDEX .945 .945 .945 .945 .945 .945 .945 .945 .945 .945 .945 .945 .945 .729 .720 .540 .477 .441 .432 .432 .405 .405 .405 .405 .405 .405 .297 .279 .270 .270 .270 .270 .216 .189 .189 .139 .189 .180 .180 102 SUBSTANCES FOR SIC 8070 OTHER TOTALS: 1.990 17.910 98.880 image: ------- APPENDIX 8 NIOSH DOCUMENTS RELATED TO SELECTED INDUSTRIES WITH HIGH (>300) SANTA CLARA COUNTY EMPLOYMENT Appendix 8 shows NIOSH documents available for industries identified in Table 4-11 (in Section 4 of this report). Industries are listed by SIC (Standard Industrial Classifica- tion); a key to SIC's is given in Appendix 11. The documents listed were identified by the NIOSH Document Information Directory System (DIDS), a computerized data file con- taining subject-indexed records of NIOSH documents. To obtain any of the documents listed below, order from the appropriate agency: Single copies of those documents cited as "AVAIL NIOSH" may be ordered without charge (include self-addressed mailing labels) from: NIOSH Publications Dissemination (R-6) 4676 Columbia Parkway Cincinnati, OH 45226 Telephone: 513-841-4287 Documents cited as "UNAVAIL NIOSH" cannot be obtained from NIOSH and must be ordered from either GPO or NTIS. Documents with a "GPO NO:" citation may be ordered in hard copy at the price shown from: Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Telephone: 202-783-3238 Documents with an "NTIS NO:" citation may be ordered in hard copy at the price shown or in microfiche for $4.50 from: National Technical Information Service Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 Telephone: 703-487-4650 When ordering from GPO or NTIS, one must include the respective GPO or NTIS stock number(s). Payment must accompany each order. There is a $3.00 shipping charge per an order. Those documents (except journal articles) cited as "OUT-OF-PRINT" or for which no specific ordering information is provided are currently not available from any source. Journal articles may be obtained through local public or university libraries. A-229 image: ------- TYPE'i Or NiJ^rl ed publications include the following: Crit3ri? Documents* Currant Intelligence ?ulletins* Health and Safety Guides* technical reports of scientific investigations* compilations of d?ta* work ar-»- si a» 9C| booklets* symposium o~ conference proceedings* and NIOS-1 administrative and management reports. CRITERIA DOCUMENTS recommend occupational health standards. Usually included as part of tha recommendation is a permissible exobsurs level; i.e.* tha concentration of a substance in the occupational environment that «ill not cause adverse affects in exaosad oers~ons. Information i« also included on personal protective equipment* work practices and sanitation* informing workers of hazards* labeling and posting* monitoring and surveillance* and r ecordkeeoing. Criteria Docum3nts on soecific processes may not hava permissible exposure levels but may recommend »ork practices and control ueasures. CU33ENT INTELLIGENCE BULLETINS (CI3) review and evalueta ne« information r?ceived by NIOSH on occuoational nazards tnat mare either unrecognized or were greater than generally known. HEALTH AND SAFETY GUIDES con ta in~ inf or mat ion to assist s.rall busnsssss in providing a safe and healthful uork environment for their oorkers. TH= HftlARO EVALUATIONS AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE (H5TA) frogram of N provides* upon request* medical* nursing* and industrial hygiene tecnnir=il and consultative assistance to pedaral* state* and local acancie-aJ la!>o-; industry; and other groups or individuals to control occupational nealti hazards and to prevent related trauma and disease. 3eoorts resulting this Program may be identified as Health Hazard Evaluations (HHr)* Technical Assistance (TA) reports* or HETA's. Please note that these reports discuss the conditions at the soecific «orksite(s) evaluated. INDUSTRYWIDE (Iy) STUDY '•aoorts assess whether occuoational exoosures of certain »orkar groups a^e associated with adverse healti consequences. Further* study dasigns vary (cohort* case control* proportionate mortality* cross-sectional incidence* reproductive questionnaire) depending on the question to be addressed and availability of d?ta. CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (CT) reports examine the most current methods for controlling exposures in the aorkolace. CONTRACT reports are generated primarily from an agreement b?*ween NIO^H and a non-governnental organization and typically involve scientific research. Since these reports can also result in a NI OSH-numb er ed publication* some records may sho* both a publication and a contract number- GRANT reports are similar but generally are done by Bcadimic insti»utions. JOJRNAL ARTICLES nritten hy NIOSH authors may apoear in either U.S. or journals. The DICS listing includes the biblioqrapnic information (journal* volume* page numbers* yesr) to permit retrieval of tn; =ir». icl? fron university or public libraries. In the DTDS data file* tnose SIOSH documjnts th?t do not fit into ?ny at ti above categories are classified as l«ISC = LLA'Jc'VJS. A-230 image: ------- The following SIC's are listed in Table 4-11, but are not evaluated in any NIOSH report or document identified by the NIOSH DIDS: 1622 1743 1752 1791 1793 2434 3469 3511 3544 3561 3569 3573 3599 3652 3769 4932 5081 5084 5541 7349 7394 7395 7539 8072 A-231 image: ------- si:-i54Z HQ93Q HH:* Hensal Phalos Construction Co./ Gre^i^y, CO. 6P» NTIS NO: Pa,-32-1 35-61 i P?ICE: f?.-?5 HHE NO: 21-Q33-S01 'JNAV UL NIOSH Hl63d HSTA^ Pennsylvania Hospital* Pni1 adslohia* °A., Movemlier 1 ?iJ4. 1 3PP NTIS NO: PB-3S-2D5-247 "9TCE: S^>.95 MHE NO: 34-221-1523 UNAVAIL NIOSH H1G36 HH5x »os«*ount* Inc.* Eden Prairie* MS. 323B NTIS NO: »?-33-1D4-455 P=iICc: I?.^5 HHE NO: 30-023-365 UNflVAIL NIOSi A-232 image: ------- < D -I A ;-m i H1512 hETA^ SEA (Sulfur E*t9nd?d Isohalt) ?o?d Construction* State o* wl./ August 1533. 25PP NTIS NO: P3-35-163-555 p'ICE: 19.91 HHE NO: 32-2^2-1352 UNftVftlL NlOSn A-233 image: ------- SIC-1623 Hlo42 H?TA, Port authority of Now York and N»jt Jarsey Elizabath Industrial Park Site* Łli*l>?th, NJ. Aaril 1934. 44?' NTIS NO: PB-=»5-1 14-122 P?ICr: t<3.? HH= NO: 32-2=54-1456 UNflVftlL NIOSH M17TO HETA* Papillon Craek Jast -3«»c image: ------- S'JbJECT ;M) = Bachtsl Pow?r NTIS NO: Pa-32-1 ?2-71 2 'PICE: HHE NO: SO-1 54-1 027 UNAVftlL N rtET4* Indiana s, Michigan Power Co.r ^ Construction °roJ3Ct^ ^ockaort, IN.* October 1933. 1*PP NTIS NO: PE-°5-177-552 P^ICE: S^.V5 HHc N3: S2-3^?-1352 JN-lvaiL NIOSH HHŁx New York Port Authority, Brooklyn/ NY. 15PP NTIS NO: P3-^3-127-3*5 PTCE: 19. y i HH= NO: aO-232-931 UNaVAIL NIQSn M1355 HcTftx P«rry Nuclear Power Plant/ Perry, OH., October 1?d2. 11PP NTIS NO: P3-U-173-012 P'ICE: S9.95 HHc NO: 82-1r:o-1203 U'^aviJL NIOSH M1733 H?TA, Philadelphia Li*erack °o«er Plant/ Pottsto«n/ "A./ Aoril 1'35. 2DP° HHE NO: ?4-172-1573 ONAvaiL NIOSH A-235 image: ------- SUcJECT INDEX H1 o 5 J H E T A * U n i t a d Association of t n e Plumbing Pig3fitting Industr/* California wept, of Housing* CA.* July 1 ? ?. 4. 3o°P IE NO: ?2-293-U32 JN1VAIL NIO'1 H13'2 rtETA* Plumbers and Gssfittars Local Union 12* Boston* *IA.* Oace^ib^r 1^32. 17" NTIS NO: P3-U-2K-775 P3IC = : S9.75 MH= NO: i?1-336-1?37 JNAVAIL ^IOSH Hlo51 HEFA, United Association of tha Plj Pioefitting Industry* California 0?ot. of Mousing* CA.* July 1v"4. 3^>P? NTIS NO: P3-25-220-212 P»IC=: 15.95 HUE NO: ?3-279-1<»32 UNAVAIL NIOSH A-236 image: ------- •1721 HHŁ/ Golden G?te Bridge District/ San cr C4. 10?e NTIS NO: o=-^3-126-4?5 P8ICE: HHŁ NO: 5:-164-°43 UNftVAT HETfi/ Grand Gulf Muds-cn- 3ou»er Plant/ "ort Gibbon/ MI./ September 1934. 22'P NTIS NO: P2-35-2?Q-3?7 P^ICE: S9.95 HHE NO: 33-132-1503 UN4VAIL NIOSH Ualk-Througn Survey R^oortx My e*- s~ Chr i s t i ans en Co.x Kensington/ MO./ Septembar o/ 1975. «.0p CONTRACT NO: 21C~77-00?6 IWSNO: I y/ 074. 66 UN 4VAIL NIOSH 13517 y alk-Througn Survey Seo'ort/ Sline Industrial Painters/Monsanto Co./ Texas City/ Tx./ October 2/ 1979. 3°P NTIS NO: P3-?3-1 D2-277 P?ICE: '.''.5 CONTRACT NO: 210-77-03^6 IUS NO: In/074. 7D UN4V4IL 'J 1 0 S n 10a48 Walk-ThrougH Survsy Report/ Courtnsy and Co./ Inc./ Texas City/ TX., July 21- 1°S2. 5^ US NO: IW/135.D3 U*4«VAIL NIOS-1 A-237 image: ------- S'JiJECT INDEX 3:==RŁNCE H1025 HHŁ» Rich»ay Daoartment Stores* Marietta/ G4. NTIS NO: P«-*2-162-132 PPICE: «^.? HHc NO: 30-215-377 JNAVAIL NIOSri A-238 image: ------- SUsJECT INO=X RErER'fNC: -1761 HcTA* Anchor Hocking Glass Co.* Roofing Sit?* Lancaster* CH.* January 19Ł3. 90? NTIS NO: P3-S4-173-046 P image: ------- SUiJfCT IN D ? X IC-1799 13711 Industrial Hygiene Survey 'sports Gorc*"?3 + s defining Co.x Mt. Pleasant* TX.* 3?c. 4* 137?? NTIS NO: P?-?5-222-222 ?3IC=: S1t.9 IWS NO: H/124.11 JMflVAIL NIDSrl H1023 MHE^ Palmar Industrial Co?tinqs* Inc.* Williamsport* PA. 25PP NTIS NO: P9-B2-215-336 »(?rCŁ: ?9.9 rtHE NO: 30-153-831 JN4VAIL NIOSH S H5TA* Pennsylvania Hospital* Pnilad^lphiax ^4.* November 1934. 1?PP NTIS NO: P3-S5-2Q3-247 PPICE: S9.9 MHE NO: 34-221-1523 UNAVAIL NIOS^ M0337 M6TA^ Tennesss* State Health Oyersburgr TN. 9PP NTIS NO: P3-32-239-545 <»?ICt: 15. ? HH5 NO: 30-030-034 UNAVAIL NICSH H1010 HHEx Tobin-Mystic Rivar Bridg-?* 3oston# MA. 25PP NTIS MO: P3-33-161-954 PtlCS: ^?.9 HHE NO: 30-097-359 UNAVAIL NTDSH A-240 image: ------- S'J2JŁCT IN Tflx Coc? Cola Comoanyr H ight s t o«n/ NJ./ ioril 1934. 2?P» NTIS NO: P9-?5-195-523 P&ICE: S?.v HHE N?: 32-228-14^7 U^avaiL NIOS^ A-241 image: ------- SUBJECT IN05X IC-2541 H1733 HŁTfi, DIG* Inc.* 3 hilade loni a<- PA.» Qctolisr 19g4. 7P° NTIS NO: P3-»5-Zi.7 HHŁ NO: 54-450-1513 A-242 image: ------- SUBJECT INDEX .-2751 M14}5 HETA/ Garden City Engraving/ August/ Gi./ March 1933. 21P<> NTIS NO: P3-34-21Q-533 P*IC5: t?.?5 MHŁ NO: '.2-207-1273 UNAVAIL NIOSn 1022' Industrial Hygiene In-Qepth Survey 5«>port/ Solvent Vapor Screen Printing Operations/ Manuscreens/ Maspeth/ NY./ February 21-23/ 137°. 11PP IWS NO: IW/Q77.26 UNAVAIL NIOSH 13227 Industrial Hygiene In-Depth Survey Ssport/ Solvent Vapor Screen Printing Ooerations/ Prints Chanting Ltd./ Island City/ NY./ December 12-13/ 1973. 12PP NTIS NO: P9-31-241-754 P»IC?: *9.95 IWS NO: IW/077.23 U'JAVAIL NIOSH 10231 Industrial Hygiene In-Deptn Survey "eoort/ Solvent Vapor Screen Printing Operations, iarrat Studio/ New York City/ NY./ January 1 f,, 16, 17/ 197?. 12PP NTIS NO: PS-31-2M-762 P5ICE: '9.95 I«S NO: IW/077.2*. UNAVAIL NIOSH 10228 Industrial Hygiene In-0«»pth Survey Report/ Solvent Vapor Screen °rinting Operations'- Sznd Oisolay/ Long Island City/ NY./ January 23-25, 1979. 13P» NTIS NO: P3-21-244-691 PPICE: T9.95 IWS NO: IJ/Q77.25 UNAVAIL NIOSH I32J3 Industrial Hygiene In-Depth Survey 9»oort/ Solvent Vapor Screen Printing Operations, Ideal Decorating Corp./ Brooklyn/ NY./ January IS/ 20, 22, 1979. «,po NTIS NO: P8-S1-2<»5-169 P«?IC = : «9.?5 IWS NO: IU/Q77.22 UNAVilL NIDSH IC22i Industrial Hygiene In-Depth Survey 9?port/ Solvent Vapor Screen Printing Operations/ Cos Display/ Inc./ New York/ NY./ December 1?/ 2D/ 21/ 197?. 14P» NTIS NO: P5-32-1D3-0=6 P5ICE: T9.r5 IWS NO: IW/077.16 UNAVAIL NIOSH 'J*'5 Industrial Hygi3n» In-Oeoth Survey 0?port/ Solvent Vapor Screen Printing 032rations/ Paint Process/ Inc./ NSJJ York/ NY./ December 26-25/ 197.5. 13'P NTIS NO: P9-?2-104-5?1? ='ICr: S9.95 IWS NO: IW/077.14 UNAVAIL NIOSH A-24'3 image: ------- SU3J5CT INDEX ?E=E?=NC= 13251 Industrial Hygiene In-3epth Survey Solvent Vapor Screen Printing Ooerations* Hanco Art and Novelty Co.* 3 r o n « * NY.* January 30* 31* and February 1- 137?. 10P» NTIS NO: P3-?2-1CU-555 PPIC=: S«.'5 IWS NO: IW/077.23 UNtVAIL NIOSH 1324' Industrial Hygiene In-Oeoth Survey Seoort* Solvent Vapor Screen Printing Oparations* Display Msdia* Long Island* NT.* November 20* 21* 23* 1373. 15?P NTIS NO: ?3-32-1Q3-0?4 PPICE: S9.-O IWS NO: IU/077-11 UN4VAIL NIOSn 13250 Industrial Hygiene In-0«pth Survey 'eoort* Solvent Vapor Printing Operations* Jagar Studio* Long Island* NT.* December It* 15* 1 9* 1978. 12PP NTIS NO: P3-32-104-430 PPIC:: S9.?5 IWS NO: IU/077.21 UNflVilL NIOSH 10245 Industrial Hygiena In-Daptrt Survey Solvent Vapor Screen Printing O Larstan Processing Co.* Inc.., Maspeth* NT.* November 13* 14* 13* 1975. 12°° NTIS NO: P3-32-15Q-E30 P5ICE: SP.95 IWS NO: IW/077.15 UMIVAIL NlOSrl H1542 HETA* McCourt Laljsl Co.* Bradford* PA., Novembsr 1953. 1DPP NTIS NO: P3-35-1S1-261 oRICE: S9.?5 HHE NO: 53-266-1391 UNAVilL H3920 HHE* National Oceanic and Atnosohsric Administration* U.S. Oeot. of Co^niar ca * Washington* DC. "PP NTIS NO: P9-32-1 S3-590 PRICE: 19.95 MHE NO: "0-248-791 UN4VAIL NIOSH H137Q HETA* Oicy Petroleuti* Inc.* Oenvsr* CO.* November 1°32. 6P«> NTIS NO: PS-34-172-722 P7ICE: 59.95 HHŁ NO: 32-266-1213 UNAVAIL NIOSH rt/!363 HETA* Placer County C is tribu t ors* Tahoe City* CA., October 1932. 11PP NTIS NO: P3-U-1^2-980 PSTCr: S9.95 HHE NO: ^1-033-1203 UNAVAIL NIOSH .A-244 image: ------- SUSJECT INDrX HETA, Screen Printing Shops^ Boston* Mi., Denton, MD., January 1?^5. A?PO NTIS SO: P5-36-105-3?2 ?5ICŁ: S11.9 MME MO: 22-212-1553 UNdVAIL 'JIOSH HETAr Tahoe Designs* Tahoe City* CA.x Seotember NTIS NO: P3-34-149-12"? PRICE: $9.95 HHE NO: 31-332-1174 JNAVAIL NIOSH A-245 image: ------- SU3JŁCT IN3EX. IC-2752 Hi 377 HETA* Arts Consortium* Cincinnati* OH.* Nov 1932. 7P° NTIS NO: P"-3..-1 72-324 P'ICr: S9.95 HHc NO: '2-01)5-1226 UNAVAIL NIOSH HQ942 HHE* Oapartmant of Comnsrc9* Washington* DC.. 11PP NTIS NO: P3-32-133-17? P9ICE: 19.95 HHE ND: BQ-111-326 UMAVAIL NIOSM H1132 H=TA* Hillsrich and Sradsby Co.^ Jsffersonvi 11e* IN.* Oace.nber 1'gi. 1QPP NTIS NO: P9-52-132-4-50 PPIC = : S9.95 MHŁ NO: ?1-192-1323 UNAVAIL NIOSH H1193 HHEx King-Smith Printing Co., Detroit^ MI.r January 1P NTIS NO: P3-35-159-3D4 PRICE: S9.95 HHŁ NO: 31-304-1361 UNSVAIL NIQSH H1242 HETA* T»eddle Litha Co., St. Clair Snores* MI., Aoril 1952. 12PP NTIS NO: P=»-33-202-3°3 P"IC = : S9.^5 HHŁ NO: S1-117-1037 UNAVAIL NlOSi H1325 H=TA* U.S. Army RaSearch Office* ?ese=irc*i Triangle Park* NC.* Seoteitbsr 19i2. 16°P NTIS NO: P3-34-150-259 PSICE: «9.95 NO: 32-136-1175 UNAVAIL NIOSH A-246 image: ------- C-2S1' H1110 MHE* CMC Corp.* Nitro* WV. 9PP NTIS NO: P3-33-161-19Q s"> I C E : 1-3.95 HHE NO: M-339-965 jNAValL NlOSn M1J?5 HETA* Hercules* Inc.* Hop»«ell* VA.* December 19o2. 4DP NTIS NO: PS-24-172-766 PRICE: S9.95 HHŁ NO: 32-257-1240 UNftVAIL NIOSM H3330 MHE* Rei*ecki 3erylco Industries* Inc./ 3oy?rto*n* PA. 21PP NTIS NO: P3-32-1C9-717 P'lCE: S?.? HHE Nf>: 79-037-773 UNAVAIL NIOSM H1Q72 HHE* Lithiun Corp. of America* Besse'nsr City* NC. 21PP NTIS NO: P2-33-102-9Q5 PRIC1:: ^9.9 HHE NO: 33-330-922 UNAVAIL NIOSM H1670 H?TA* Stauffer Cha«ical Co.* Mo^-r isw i 1 1 ** PA., September 1^54. 16P° NTIS NO: P3-85-203-256 «»'ICf: S?.?5 HHE NO: 32-231-1503 UNAVAIL NIOSH H1U6 HHE* Stauffer Che-niccil Co.* Chicago Heights* IL..- Nowambar 1931. 3P? NTIS NO: P9-S2-1 S7-394 ?»ICŁ: ^.55 HHE NO: 53-224-992 UNAVAIL NIOSM M1719 HETA* United Catalysts* Inc., South Plpnt* Louisville* KY.* Pabruary 1955. 5530 NTIS NO: PB-86-11&-951 PRICE: t 1 1 . 9 5 HHE NO: S2-3'53,-155 ', UNAVAIL NIOSM M1720 HETA* United Catalysts* Inc.* West Plant* Louisville* HY.* cebruary 19S5. 54P» NTIS NO: P2-96-117-520 P^ICE: S11.95 HHE NO: 83-375-1559 UNAVAIL NIOSM I03J4 Halk--Through Survsy Report* Herr-VcGee Ch image: ------- SUBJECT INJ = SIC-2321 H1276 HETA/ Alliad Chemical* Baton 3ouge/ LA./ February 1932. 31PP NTIS NO: P3-33-233-31 '7 UNflVilL MOSH H1427 HET4/ National Starch and Chemical/ M3radosia/ IL./ March 1933. 11"? NTIS NO: P'5-34-209-923 =>^ICE: S?.?5 HHE NO: 82-051-1269 UNAVAIL NlOSH H1311 HET4/ Olin (formerly Allied) Chemical Co., Moundsvilla/ UV./ August 19?2. 3?P» NTIS NO: P3-94-150-465 " ? I C E : S9.75 HHE NO: 31-295-1155 UNAVaiL N H3925 HHE/ USS Nowa.nont/ Inc., Florence/ KY. 10'C1 NTIS NO: P3-32-H3-234 P'TC?: S^.5 HHE NO: 30-194-7?6 UNAVAIL ^4rOSH I3i57 Walk-Through Survey Seoort/ 3.F. Goodrich Co./ Louisvilla/ KY.» Seateniher 20/ 1977. 4»P IWS NO: IU/Q34.13 UNAVAIL NIOSH A-248 image: ------- SUaJECT INDEX HETA, 01? Cora.* Warren, MI., Septe-nbar 1531. 1 3PP NTIS NO: P3-55-173-507 ?5IC5: S9.95 MHŁ NO: 52-377-1376 UNAVfllL NTOSH HHŁ, International Harvester Truck ?igineering and Design Center, et. Wayn?* IN. 133P NTIS m: P3-32-253-2?4 P image: ------- SUBJECT INDEX H1433 H?TA* SutissvaLa Auto Surplus °cfts/ Inc.* Pittsburgh PA., Marcn 1^?3. "U?p , NTIS NO: PS-34-210-3-,4 39ICE: 19.95 Ł NO: 52-246-1275 UNAVAIL NIOSH A-272 image: ------- SUSJ-CT :C-5511 HH3* Sob uerren cord* Inc./ Mctni P NO: 79-128-8D6 JN4V4IL NIOSH A-273 image: ------- 5JSJ5CT INDEX 3:FE3=NCE -,IC-721o pi/a-* H;TA* Oenve- Laundry and Dry Cleaning* Denver* CO.* July 1M'. 14PP HUE NO: 14-340-1636 UNAVAIL NIOSH IQ243 Industrial Hygiene Survay Report/ Perchloroe thy 1 ene* Carnation One-Hour Cleaners* 5ronx* NY.* August 2d* I'7'. SPP NTIS NO: P3-32-1D4-571 "SICE: SP NTIS NO: PB-^1-244-675 ?t>IC5: SJ.vS IMS NO: IW/071.54 UN4VAIL NIOSH lOJio Industrial Hygiene Survey Report* Perchl or 03 1 hy lane* Exclusive Cleaners* Chicago* IL.* July 20* 1^7'5. 3'» NTIS NO: PB-32-104-332 P^ICE: 1?.?5 IUS NO: IW/071.47 J'UVftlL NIOSH IT247 Industrie! Hygiene Survey Report* Percnloroe tny 1 ene* Doutntouin Clean?rs* Chicago/ IL.* July ^•>, 1973. ?P<> NTIS NO: P3-32-134-537 P^ICE: t?.?5 US NO: U/371.42 J'JIVAIL SI3SH 13332 Industrial Hygien? Su"v?y Report* J?r ch loro? tiy 1 en e* pearlass Cleaners* Ne * York* NY., august 33* V79. 11»P NT 1 5 NO: «*!-? 2-1 33-073 P?IC = : !?.v5 IWS NT: TU/071.52 JN1V4IL NIJSH 10331 Industrial Hyqiene Survey ?3oort* Perchloroethyl3na* Marvel Cleaners* N»m York, NY.* August 2-?* 1^77. 11?a NTIS NO: P3-52-13J-2U ?9IC = : ^.-?5 IW3 NO: U/071.4? 'JN4V4IL NIOSH lOn': Industrial Hygiine Survey Report* ^erchlof-o^tTylrns* Suhy's Cleaners* H^y Cl.* July Ł•>, 197^. 10?° NTIS NO: P3-S2-1 3-i-079 '?IC = : i US NO: U/Q71.14 UUVAIL M Industrial Hygiene Survey R P?rcnloro3thyl3ne* Too Hat Clo-an3«-3* San i?t?o* CA.* July 27* 13^j. 103" NTIS NO: J>-i--2-1 -J ?-21 2 "PICE: ^ . ; US NO: IW/371.24 UNAVAIL NIOSH A-274 image: ------- SU5J:CT Industrial Hy^ion? Survey Report* Per c h 1 o- o ? t ny I en e* Sterling Cleaners and Laundry* Surlingame* CA.* July 24* 1 "573. 10PO NTIS NO: P3-32-1 3*»-9;A PSTCE: J>.95 IWS NO: IW/071.21 UNAVAIL NIOSM Industrial Hygiene Survey Report* Perchloroe thy lene* Solden Stati Clsaners* San francisco* CA.* July 25r 1973. 3PP NTIS NO: P3-32-191-271 P3ICE: S9.95 IWS NO: IW/071.26 UNAV4IL NIOSH [3453 Industrial Hygiens Survey °erchl or oe tny lane* Peninsula cr?nch Cleaners* inscv*=?r C4.* July 27* 1<>73. 11PP NTIS NO: P8-?2-1'1-239 P3ICE: 19.95 IWS NO: IW/071.23 UN4VAIL I](,91 Industrial Hygiene Survey Report* Perc hlor oe t hy 1 ene* Mills Park Cleaners* San 3runo* CA., July 28* 107S. 1i«>P NTIS NO: P3-32-193-S16 PRIC=: <9.95 US NO: IW/371.25 UNAVAIL NlOSh 10534 Industrial Hygiene Su'vey Report* Perchl oroe thy lene* 3road*ay Cleaners* Redaood City* CA.* July 26* 1978. 10PP IUS NO: IH/071. 13 UN1VAIL NI03H I05K Industri-al Hygiene Survey Report* Per cnl or oe thy lene* Esrik Cleaners* San Francisco* CA.* July 26* 1^73. 1QPP NTIS NO: P3-°,2-1 36-^73 P&ICE: !9.55 IWS NO: Id/071.23 UKAVAIL NlOSi Industrial Hygiene Survey Report* Perchlo^oethy lene* White Oak Drive-In Cleaners* San Carlos* CA.* July 25, 197f. 1CP3 NTIS NO: P3-32-136-7C1 PRICE: S9.95 IUS N?: IW/071.17 JNAVAIL NIOSH Industrial Hygiene Survey Report* Perchlo~oe thy lene* Soy's Cleaners* Psdaood City* CA.* July 23* 1°7S. 11PP NTIS NO: o=i-32-15y-?23 P3ICE: «9.?5 IWS NO: IW/071.23 LPJAVAIL NIDSH A-275 image: ------- IN 2 = X 13515 Industrial Hygiene Su-vey Report* Perchloroethyiena* 3. c. Thomas Cip-iners* Ssn Francisco* CA., July ?5* 197o. J5?P NTIS NO: °3-.32-139-9cO P3ICE: S ? . ? 5 IW5 NO: TW/071.22 UN4V4IL NIOSH 10536 I05D7 10511 10513 100:7 13035 10006 10034 Industrial Hyjiens Su-vey Report* Perchloroethylans* 3aston"s Cleaners, Lafayette* CA.* July 23* 1975. 9PP NTIS NO: Pd-82-191-263 P° IMS NO: IW/071.34 UNAVAIL NIOSH Industrial Hygiene Survey Report* Percnloroethy lane* Janet Davis Cleaners, ) Detroit MI.* May 13* 1=573. PCIC:: S9.95 U'JSVAIL NTOSH NTIS NO: P3-S1-227-5C4 IMS NO: IU/071.37 Industrial Hygiane Survey S Par chl oroi thy 1 en 3* Pina Cleaners* Detroit* MI.* May 15* 1979. image: ------- SJ5J1CT 13333 Industrial Hygiene Su-vey Perchloro3thylene, Janet Davis Cleaners* Detroit* *!.* h?y 17* T7J- 5op NTIS NO: P3-31-245-177 P*ICE: '9.95 IWS NO: I U/ 07 1.3 6 UNAVAIL .'J I OS H J1Q33 Industrial Hygiene Survey R Perchloro? thy 1 ene* Upper Mack Cleaners* Detroit* MI.* i?y 17, 1979. 9PP NTIS NO: P3-31-245-1 55 PPIC5: S9.55 IWS NO: TW/071.35 UN4VAIL NIOSM ;}j34 Industrial Hyqi?ns Survey Report, Perchlor oe tay 1 jne, 3 and 3 Cleaners* Chicago, IL.* July 17, 197". 11PP NTIS NO: P3-31-1s3-53o PRICE: !?.5 IWS NO: IW/Q71.53 UNAVfilL NIOSH • ^5^5 Industrial Hygiene Survey Report* Parchloroethylens* -arnaood Cleanars* Chicago, IL.* July 20* 1979 SPP NTIS NO: P?"42-214-719 P'ICE: f'.-JS IWS NO: IW/071.43 UNAVAIL NIOSn Industrial Hygien? Survey Report, Per chl or oe thy 1 ene* Morton Drive-In Cleaners* Chicago* IL.* July 19, 1979. ??^ NTIS NO: B^-32-215-32-3 ?-ICt: «9.93 IWS NO: IW/071.44) UNAVAIL NIOSH Industrial Hygi3na Survey Report* P ?r chl o'-oe thy 1 en ^ * H?ooy Cleaner "^n Cle?nsr.i, Ne* York* r;Y.* August 2'* 1°73. 3PP •JTIS NO: PB-i2-2?1-3io priC:: *9.95 IWS NO: TW/071.51 UNAVAIL NIOSH A-277 image: ------- SU3J5CT IQ537 Industrial riygiero Survay Deport* Perch lor o? thy lene* Oaoosr Qan C Flushing* NY.* ftuqust 50* 1971?. NTIS NO: P3-32-215-330 IWS NT; IW/071.53 P3ICE: UNAV4IL 511.35 'JI05H Industrial Hygiene Survey ^ ferchloroa thy 1 enas ^oycour* Cleaners* Detroit* MI.* May 15* 1979 3P° NTIS NO: P^-^2-209-560 P'ICE: SJ.^S IWS NO: IW/071.32 UN4V4IL NIJSH 13592 Industrial Hygiene Su'wey Perchl oro? thy lene* 31ua Bibbon Cleaners* Detroit* ML, May U-15* 1<'79. OOP NTIS NO: P5-32-215-2^5 »?IC=: 1^.5 IWS NO: IH/071.33 JNiVaiL NIOSH I307<> Industrial Hyqian? Su-v«y Report* Parchlor oe thy lene* Gold "odal Cleciners* Chicago* IL.* July 16* 1-J79. 3PP NTIS NO: °3-31-239-774 =>R!C=: S3. 95 IMS NO: IU/Q71.39 UNftVAIL NI3SH 1053? Walk-Through Surway Report* Perchlor o«?thy 1 e->e* Sand«r»s Cleaners* Oatroit/ M!., May 15* 1?7J 9PP NTIS NO: PS-S2-215-179 P?IC=: f9.9 IMS NO: IW/C71.33 UN4V4IL NIOSH A-278 image: ------- S'J3J:CT -7P1 0121S H^TA* National Marine Fisheries Southeast Fisheries C 9 n t P •• r Ch,?rl. image: ------- SUBJECT IfJQcX 5IC-7392 H1625 HETAx American Entgrprise Instituts* Wetshin DC., lay 1 934. 11 Pf> NTIS NO: P3-35-154*273 PRICE: S^.P HHc NO: S3-1T9-1296 U»J4VAIL NTOSh A-280 image: ------- SUBJfCT INJEX HH75 METflx J.S. r.3.*. Central 9?gional L?bor?tory, Annapolis^ 10.^ June 1?°3. 1 5P? NTIS '40: P5-35-101-5H1 P^ICf: »9.9 MHŁ NO; ?3-141-1322 UNfiVAIL NIOSH A-281 image: ------- SUoJECT INDEX IC-7399 HHE, fountain S image: ------- SU3J5CT HFT4* CPS* °ouier and cauiomcnt^ 5 o 1 i ngljr ook ^ IL.» Ha/ 1933. 11?o NTISNO: P5-3,4-2'D?-519 P?I3E: S'i.^ HH= NO: ?3-0?D-13Q7 U'UVAIL NTOSH A-283 image: ------- SU3J=CT INDEX HSTA, Charlie's Taxidermy and Gifts* pla?tiflcod, ?A., August 1?34. 21PP NTIS NO: P3-25-22Q-309 PPIC5: h?.* HMŁ NO: ?3-276-U<3? IQ731 Industrial Hy^iane Report* Savage Walker Schult image: ------- SUBJECT INOrX HETA, Alh^iibra Pizza, Clinton* NJ., Aoril NTIS NO: P3-?5-135-5?c. P^ICc: T~.?5 HHE NO: 32-Z^>4-1453 JMAVilL NIOSH H15?1 H'TAx Mark Bradie, D.D.S., Enqlewood, CO.* February 1934. 13PP NTIS NO: P'i-iS-l 31-295 PSICE: 59.95 HHE NO: «3-09e-1415 UNAVAIL NIOSH H16'7 HETA* J. Sutler, D.O.S.* Uell^ton, OH., November 1934. 21PP NTIS NO: P9-«5-202-254 PPICE: S9.95 HHE NO: 34-090-1553 u'; AVAIL N!OSn H11S3 HHŁ^ Conifer Osntal G'-oup, Conifer/ CO., Novembe" 1931. 9P? NTIS NO: P3-32-137-04? PPICE: $9.95 HHE NO: 31-200-999 UNAVAIL NTOSH H1753 HETAx Dental Healtn Associates, Paoli, PA.* June 1935. 14P«> HHc NO: 34-204-1600 UNAVAIL NIOSH M3363 HETA* Randle Egbert* Jr., D.D.S., Milford* OH. 3PP NTIS NO: P3-32-151-010 P^IC?: S9.95 HH= NO: 30-102-7i4 UNAVAIL NIOSh H1503 HETA* Robert J. Goetr, D.D.S., Cincinnati, OH., August 1933. 12'? HHE NO: ^3- 01 2-1 354 UN1VAIL NUSn Nld^S r(?TA, Steohan Gold, O.O.S., Port Jefferson Station, NT., M?y 19?4. 13PP NTJS NO: P?-35-1 34-257 P'ICE: S9.95 HHE NO: ^1-111-K71 UNtVAIL NIOSH HH = , Stew»n Janouiiti* O.D.S., Alexard'-ia, VA. 3PP NTIS NO: P3-S2-15J-152 P9ICE: tg.g HHE NT: 90-003-735 UNAVAIL NIOSH HHc, Robert W. Olson, 3.O.S., Conifer, CO. 3PP NTIS NO: 03-^2-172-107 P^ICE: S^.-3 HHc NO: ^0-249-?33 UNiVilL NIOSH A-285 image: ------- SUBJECT IN3=X REFESrNC: H1717 HETA/ 3rs. Sender and G?rdner* Cincinnati, OH., January 1 ? 35. 1 NTI3 NO: P3-?a-1 HH= NO: 34-126-1555 UN4V4IL MIOS^ H0943 HHE/ US'HS-IHS Dental Clinic^ St. Ignatius.- MT. 7PP NTIS NO: P3-32-15V-756 P^ICS: 5^.95 HHE NO: 33-113-313 UNAVAIL NI03H H1303 H5T4* Wast Gate Dental Clinic/ Cn«y?nna/ WT./ July 1532. 9PP NTIS NO: o»-34-UO-672 PRICE: ?9.95 E NO: 62-070-114? UN4VAIL H1763 HETA* Ors. Youdelnan and Teiq/ 9rentijoodx NY./ July 1935. 14PP HHE NO: "4-412-1612 UNAVAIL NIOSH A-286 image: ------- SUiJ-ICT I'OEX ?-.,= E^:NCt Industry-wide Studies Deport* Industrial Survey* 3ayna-jon?s U.S. Army Community Hospital, Ft. Polk* LA., A.onl :<.* 15>35. 24PP NTIS NO: 03-35-234-474 PRICE: %?.35 IWS NO: IW/152.10 UNAVAIL NlOS.-t 10749 Industrywide Studies »eport* Industrial Hygiane Survey/ Col. Florence A. Bianchfield U.S. Army Coanunity Hospital* Ft. Crmpbell* KY., Sect. 16* 1935. 32PP IWSNO: Irf/152.11 UNAVAIL N 1 0 S H 137*3 Industrywide Studies Rsoort* Industrial Hygiena Survey* Cutler U.S. Army Community Hospital, Ft. Devens- HA., Oct. 31* 1°55. 31PP IWS NO: IW/152.12 UNAVAIL NIOSH HETA* Denver Seneral 4osoital* Denver* CO.* July 1°34. 3PP NTIS MO: P?--!5-2?0-911 ?SICE: 15.^5 HHE NO: ?4-17<.-1490 UNAVilL NIOSrt H10J1 MHE* Ellis Hospital* Schenectady* NY. NTIS NO: P3-33-126-391 P^ICE: S9.35 HHE NO: 31-350-932 UNAVAIL NIOSH HU'5 META* Emanuel Hospital* Portland* OS., July 13!13. 14PO NTIS NO: PS-35-102-345 PICE: S9.9S HHE NO: ?D-177-11fr6 UNAVAIL NICSn HH = , Lincoln Medical and Mental Health Csnt-r* 3r0n«* Vt. 9»P NTIS NO: ?S-'.2-1*>2-249 o^ICE: t9.?5 HHŁ NO: ^1-063-5':2 U'JSVAIL NI05H A-287 image: ------- iU3J='-l H 1 3 4 d HETA* African S * i n 9 Fever Laboratory* Santo Ooroingo* Dominican Republic/ September 19 = 2. NTIS NO: P3-?4-150-049 PRICE: T9.95 HHE NO: 32-134-1197 UNAVAIL NIOSH H1546 HSTA* California Society for Hist ot echnology * Los Angeles* CA., November 1933. 43PP NTIS NO: P3-25-179-273 P°ICE: S11.55 HHE NO: 31-t22-13d7 UNAVAIL NIOSH HET4, U.S. E.P.A. Central Regional Annapolis* HO.* June 1933. 15P° NTIS NO: P3-35-1 31-541 PRICE: t9.J5 HHŁ NOs 33-141-1322 UNAVAIL NIOSi H1024 HHc* Georgia Oeot. of Human Resources* Drug Abusa Laboratory* Atlanta* GA. 1 OPP NTIS NO: P3-32-214-412 P^ICE: S9.95 HHŁ NO: 81-053-376 UNAVAIL NIOSH. H1513 HETA* Louis A. Johnson Medical Center* Clarksuurg* WV.* Seote.flber 19?3. 9o;> NTIS NO: P3-35-163-442 B?ICE: S9.95 HHŁ NO: .13-363-1364 UNAVAIL NIOSH Hlb^l HETA* Nassau County HaaltN O^ot. Laboratories* nemos t ead* NY.* Nowambar 1934. 12°° NTIS NO: P3-35-203-262 PRICE: S?.35 HHE NO: 34-32<»-1526 UNAV4IL NIDSH H1145 HHE* Naval 9 io sci'snc 33 Laboratory/ Oakland* CA./ Nov-mbar 1^31. 3"»P NTIS NO: P3-32-1 ?7-373 ?HCz: ?5.'5 HHE NO: 2'>H3-''91 UN4VAIL NIOSH H1336 HETA* Olynpic Paninsul? Kidney Center* Sremarton* WA.* November 1932. 7P" NTIS NO: P3-54-172-3Cd P?IC5: S^.vS HHŁ NO: 82-242-1234 UNAVAIL NIOSH Hi 333 H5TA* Olynpic Medical Laboratories* Bremerton* WA., November 19fl2. -P° \TIS NO: P3-34-172-3'39 P'ICr: ?9.95 HHŁ NO: "2-264-1232 UNAVilL NIOSH H^20o HETA* University of Gaorgia* Coll?g? of Veterinary ledicne* His tapat ho lo ?y Laboratory* Athens* GA., February 1"H2. 11PP NTIS NO: P3-33-193-4Q? 3°ICE: 59. 9=: HHE NO: -n-22o-1 3-»3 UNAVAIL A-290 image: ------- SUbJECT IN3EX S = = -5--NC; Mj737 HETA* United Hospital, Grand Porks* NO., Aoril HHE NO: 55-OS5-1S7? UNiVflTL NlQSrt MHŁ* Univ»rso.ty of Cal i f o^ni a/Mof f i tt Hospital* San Francisco* CA. 15Pp NTIS NO: P3-52-215-344 P?IC5: <9.95 MHE NO: 33-191-E29 U^AVAIL NIOSH A-291 image: ------- SUBJECT INDEX 103071 H1346 HETA* African Suine Fever Laboratory* Santo Oo.nincio* Dominican ?enublic* Ssptember 1':2 NTIS NO: P3-34-153-Q49 PRICE: 39.9 HME NO: 32-134-1197 UNAVAIL NIOSH H1546 HETA* California Society for Hi st ot echnology * Los Angeles* CA.* November 1933. 4?ps> NTIS NO: P3-25-179-273 P»ICE: til.?1 H4= NO: 31-H22-13c7 UNAVAIL NIOS-t HETft* U.S. E.°.A. Central Regional Annapolis* HO.* June 1933. 15P3 NO: P3-35-131-541 PRICE: T9.95 NO: 83-141-1322 UNAVAIL NIOSl M1024 HHc* Georgia Deot. of Human Resources/ Drug Abusa Laboratory* Atlanta* GA. 1QP3 NTIS NO: P3-32-2U-412 P^ICE: S9.95 HHŁ NO: 81-053-376 'JNAVAIL NIOSH H1513 HETA* Louis A. Johnson Medical Center* Clarksuurg* WV.* Seote.tilier 1933. 9" NTIS NO: PB-35-163-442 »?ICE: 59.95 Ł NO: 13-365-13t4 UNAVAIL NIOSH rll6^1 HETA* Nassau County Health Oeot. Laboratories* Hamostead* NY.* Nowambsr 1934. 12°° NTIS NO: ?3-S5-233-2c2 PRICE: l?.^5 HHE NO: U-32^-1526 UNAVAIL NUSrt H1145 HHf* Naval Siosci^ncss Laboratory* Oakland* CA./ Nov»mbar 1 ^31 . 3°P NTIS NO: P3-32-1 37-373 "?IC=: S'.95 H-tŁ NJ: S3-133-991 UNAVAIL MOSl H1336 HcTA* Olyngic Psninsui? Kidn?y Cent?r* Bremerton* WA.* November 1932. 7=" NTIS NO: P3-?4-172-3C.-i P'ICS: $^5 HHŁ NO: 32-242-1234 UNAVAfL NlJSrt M^ 333 HETA* Olympic Msdical Laboratories* 3r emer ton* JA., November 1^82. fP° NTIS NO: P3-34-172-3"39 3'ICE: S5.95 HHE N.T: =2-264-1232 UNAVilL NIOSH H 1 2 ? o HŁTA* University of Gaorgia* Coll? 3? of Veterinary Medicine* His t opat ho 1 o gy Laboratory* Athens* GA.* eebrua'-y 1"H2. 11PP NTIS MO: Pi-^3-193-43; "ICE: S9.?=: E NO: -i1-22t>-1 3-»3 JN4VAIL N A-292 image: ------- APPENDIX 9 J» REGISTERED CARCINOGEN USERS IN SCUARA COUNTY0 b oes i 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 f* SIC 5531 1542 1742 1742 1742 1752 1752 1761 2752 2752 (j RECSTRO SEP77 OEC84 NOV77 OCT77 SEP77 SEP77 SEP77 OCT77 SEP77 SEP77 NAME CAL'S RADIAL TIRE 125 CAL COAST CONSTRUCTION DRYWALL INTERIORS ELLISON PLASTERING PARKS PLASTERING CO HOODS FLOOR COVERING HOODS FLOOR COVERING ROYAL SHEET METAL INC DELUXE CHECK PRINTER INC DELUXE CHECK PRINTERS INC CITY-CAMPBELL ADDRESS S SAN TOMAS AQUINO 529 A FORMAN DRIVE 550-C RAILWAY AVE 491 W RINCON AVE BOX 876 350 W HEDEGARD 350 W HEDEGARD 861 CAMDEN AVE 1551 DELL AVE 1551 DELL AVE riTY=CIIPFRT INrt CA CITV RD CAMPBELL CAMPBELL CAMPBELL CAMPBELL CAMPBELL CAMPBELL CAMPBELL CAMPBELL CAMPBELL CAMPBELL CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA ZIP 95008 95008 95008 95008 95008 95008 95008 95008 95008 95008 e JfEMPLYD 3 25 10 7 9 19 19 9 175 175 f fAFECTD 2 20 10 7 4 3 3 3 1 1 g UNION N N N Y Y Y Y N N N h CARC 15 15 15 15 15 15 16 15 15 15 OBS SIC REGSTRO NAME 1 KJ <Ł> to 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 8221 AUG77 CUPERTINO UNION SCHOOL DISTRIC 3674 OCT81 HEWLETT PACKARD 3674 JAN80 INTERSIL 3674 HAR80 LITRONIX INC 3674 APR84 TRILOGY 3674 MAY80 Z 1 LOG 8072 JUL77 TOWN It COUNTRY DENTAL LAB INC OBS SIC REGSTRD NAME IB 1423 DEC82 GRANITE ROCK COMPANY 19 1731 SEP77 WM RADTKE fc SON 20 2952 AUG77 REPUBLIC POWDERED METALS CO 1030 1090 1090 1900 1050 1046 1031 AD 647 44 20 OBS SIC RECSTRD NAME 21 22 23 24 1742 1752 1752 7534 AUG83 AUG77 AUG77 AUG77 PHILLIP RILES-DRYWALL SPECIALI WALTHER'S WALTHER'S LOS ALTOS FLOOR COVERING FLOOR COVERING TIRE SERVICE OBS SIC REGSTRO NAME ADDRESS 10900 N TANTAU AVE 190000 HOMESTEAD RD 10500 RIDCEVIEW COURT ) BUBB RD I S DEANZA BLVD CITY=GILROY CA 6475 CHESTNUT 44 MARTIN ST BOX 307 CITY=LOS ALTOS CA ADDRESS 13290 LENNOX WAY 5084 EL CAMINO 5084 EL CAMINO 317 FIRST ST CITY=LOS GATOS CA ADDRESS CITY ZIP fEMPLYD fAFECTD UNION CARC CUPERTINO CA CUPERT (NO CA CUPERTINO CA CUPERTINO CA T CUPERTINO CA CUPERTINO CA CUPERTINO CA 95014 95014 95014 95014 95014 95014 95014 249 420 600 1950 650 100 6 6 1 600 18 4 24 3 Y N N N N N N 15 20 20 20 20 20 15 CITY ZIP JEMPLYD fAFECTD UNION CARC GILROY CA GILROY CA GILROY CA 95020 95020 95020 49 9 4 13 7 2 N Y Y 15 15 15 CITY ZIP IEHPLYD /CAFECTO UNION CARC LOS ALTOS CA LOS ALTOS CA LOS ALTOS CA LOS ALTOS CA 94022 94022 94022 94022 3 10 10 3 2 1 1 2 N Y Y N 15 15 16 15 CITY ZIP fEMPLYD fAFECTD UNION CARC 25 1795 NOV82 ASBESTOS REMOVAL fc CONSULTANTS 644 N SANTA CRUZ AVE SUITE 11 LOS GATOS CA 95030 7 7 N 15 26 B221 SEP77 LOS GATOS TIRE SERVICE 577 UNIVERSITY LOS GATOS CA 95030 32 Y 15 OBS 27 28 SIC REGSTRD NAME 3662 3691 JUL81 SEPBO HARRIS MICROWAVE SEMICONDUCTOR ESB EXIUE CORP •- CITY=MILPITAS CA - ADDRESS 1530 MC CARIHY BLVD 700 MONIACUt EXP CITY MILPITAS CA MILPITAS CA ZIP ffMPLYD fAFECTD 95035 95035 10 32 UNION N Y CARC 20 20 OBS 29 in CITY=MORGAN HILL CA SIC REGSTRD NAME ADDRESS CITY ZIP fEMPLYO fAFECTD UNION CARC 1711 SEP77 ASCO AIR CONDITIONING INC 15250 RAILROAD AVE BOX 1480 MORGAN HILL CA 95037 99 Y 15 I(?1I SfP77 RfRT f IFSSIIP TRANSPnR AT I ON lf>','>() PAMROAC AVF ROX M, ) fl MORT.AN HIM TA q">ni7 1 t N 1S image: ------- REGISTERED CARCINOGEN USERS IN SCLARA COUNTY ClTY=MOUNTAIN VIEW CA OBS SIC RECSTRD NAME ADDRESS CITY ZIP 4EMPLYD IAFECTD UNION CARC 31 32 33 31 35 36 37 38 39 10 11 12 13 11 15 16 17 18 19 50 51 52 53 51 55 > 56 1 57 to 58 «5 59 *• 60 61 62 63 61 1711 3576 3832 1522 1511 1512 1711 1712 1793 1795 3671 3671 3671 3671 3671 3671 3679 1213 7538 7629 7629 8072 8072 8072 3596 3811 3829 3829 3829 3679 3679 3679 1212 1731 SEP77 APR78 SEP77 SEP77 SEP77 AUC77 SEP77 SEP77 HAR82 APR80 AUG79 AUG79 AUG79 AUG79 FEB81 MAY80 JAN81 AUG77 AUG77 AUG77 AUG77 SEP77 AUG77 AUG77 DEC78 NOV83 SEP79 SEP79 SEP79 JUL77 JUL77 JUL77 AUG77 OCT80 LEFCO INC ACUREX CORP L 1 CON 1 X THE JACK DIAMOND CO ROBERT E. AGORASTOS. GEN CONT RUDOLPH & SLETTEN INC MERCURY SHEET METAL It HEATING D&R PAQUETTE ROYAL GLASS fc MIRROR CO FERMA CORP FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR NEC ELECTRONICS INC RAYTHEON CO SEMICONDUCTOR DIV TELEDYNE M E C ANRAK CORP GENE'S YOUNG AUTO PARTS WALTER A FAGAN CO WALTER A FAGAN CO DENTAL LABORATORY GROUP INC EL CAM! NO DENTAL STUDIO VERANT DENTAL LAB INC CRYSTAL TECHNOLOGY INC INTERACTION CHEMICALS. INC. GAS TECH ING GAS TECH INC GAS TECH INC ARVIN ECHO ECHO SCIENCE CORP ARVIN ECHO ECHO SCIENCE CORP ARVIN ECHO ECHO SCIENCE CORP UNIVERSAL TRANSPORT SYSTEM INC WISMER It BECKER 1300 SPACE PARK WAY 185 CLYDE AV 1100 STIERLIN RD 190 SO WHISMAN RD 101 CALDERON AV 1023 STIERLIN RD, BOX 1089 81 PIONEER WY 110 EVELYN AVE BOX 606 2569 WYANDOTTE AVE BOX 1315 161-ELLIS ST 515 WHISMAN RD. 161-ELLIS ST 515 WHISMAN RD. 550 E MIDDLEFIELD RD 350 ELLIS ST 1290 TERRA BELLA AVE 2672 BAYSHORE FRONTAGE RD 279 CASTRO ST 275 CASTRO ST 275 CASTRO ST 2130 CHARLESTON RD 185 S DRIVE 1059 EL MONTE AVE 2510 OLD MIDDLE FIELD WAY 1615 PLYMOUTH ST. 331 FAIRCHILD DR 31 FAIRCHILD DR 331 FAIRCHILD DR 250 MARGARITA 250 MARGARITA 250 MARGARITA 2665 MARINE WAY BOX 818 r. irv='pAin AITO r* - MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN MOUNTAIN VIEW CA VIEW CA VIEW CA VIEW CA VIEW CA VIEW CA VIEW CA VIEW CA VIEW CA VIEW CA VIEW CA VIEW CA VIEW CA VIEW CA VIEW CA VIEW CA VIEW CA VIEW CA VIEW CA VIEW CA VIEW CA VIEW CA VIEW CA VIEW CA VIEW CA VIEW CA VIEW CA VIEW CA VIEW CA VIEW CA VIEW CA VIEW CA VIEW CA VIEW CA 91013 91010 91013 91011 91011 91012 91010 91010 91013 91012 91012 91012 91012 91012 91013 91012 91013 91013 91011 91011 91011 91013 91010 91010 91013 91013 91013 91013 91013 91013 91013 91013 91013 91012 19 99 9 10 3 20 21 8 11 9 1000 50 1000 50 150 150 100 3 3 10 10 19 3 2 19 7 3 3 3 19 19 19 9 30 10 7 5 3 3 1 9 8 3 5 23 1 23 1 6 22 1 3 1 3 3 3 3 1 30 3 1 1 1 3 3 3 5 30 N N N N N N Y Y N Y N N N N N N N N N Y Y N N N Y N N N N N N N Y Y 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 20 20 20 20 20 15 15 15 16 15 15 15 15 12 16 18 19 1 13 15 15 15 OBS SIC REGSTRD NAME 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 71 75 76 77 78 79 80 7391 1512 2821 3611 3662 3662 3662 3662 3679 3811 7391 7391 7539 8072 8072 8072 MAY77 JUL77 JUL77 AUG77 OCT79 MAY79 MAY79 MAY 79 APR81 MAY77 NOV81 NOV81 AUG77 JUL77 JUL77 JUL77 ELMENDORF RESEARCH INC VANCE H BROWN & SONS INC MONSANTO INDUSTRIAL CHEMICALS HEWLETT PACKARD CO FORD AEROSPACE & COMMUNICATION VARIAN ASSOCIATES VARIAN ASSOCIATES INC VARIAN ASSOCIATES INC GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORP COHERENT RADIATION INC ZOECON CORP 70ECON CORP PALO ALTO TIRE AND BRAKE DOL DENIAL LABORATORY HERBS DENTAL LAB HAHCO POLO DENTAL LAB ADDRESS 860 CHARLESTON ROAD 2717 PARK BLVD 3100 HILLVIEW 610 PAGE MILL RD 3939 FABIAN WAY 601 CALIFORNIA AVE 611 HANSEN WAY 611 HANSEN WAY 3100 HILLVIEW AVE 3210 PORTER OR PO BOX 10975 975 CALIF AVE PO BOX 10975 975 CALIF AVE 306 CAMBRIDGE AVE 703 WELCH RD SU E 1 703 WELCH ROAD SUITE CA 703 WELCH RO RMC1 CITY ZIP SEHPLYD IAFECTD UNION CARC PALO ALTO CA PALO ALTO CA PALO ALTO CA PALO ALTO CA PALO ALTO CA PALO ALTO CA PALO ALTO CA PALO ALTO CA PALO ALTO CA PALO ALTO CA PALO ALTO CA PALO ALTO CA PALO ALTO CA PALO ALTO CA PALO ALIO CA PALO ALTO CA 91303 91306 91301 91301 91303 91303 91303 91303 91301 91301 91303 91303 91306 91301 91306 91301 3 1 9 9 20 199 199 199 15 99 90 90 3 5 3 3 3 2 5 1 3 250 250 250 10 50 20 20 3 3 2 1 N N N Y N N N N Y Y N N N N N N 15 15 15 20 15 20 15 20 20 15 19 20 15 15 15 15 image: ------- SUiJfCT INDEX REFERENCE Indu s try-Wide Study Report* W?lk-Through American McSaw (A-narican Hospital Supply Corp.), Mi 11 edgeville, GA., March 11, 1' MIS NO: P3-36-125-176 P^ICE: $9.95 IWS NO: IW/o7.36 UN4VAIL NTOSH H1133 HHE, 9oehringer Ingelhaim, Ltd., ^idge field, CT. NTIS NO: P9-S3-1 ?7-4 NTIS NO: P9-31-1*:i-o01 P?ICE: ?9.95 IWS NC: IW/131.14 U'MVAIL NIOSH A249 image: ------- 106^5 Ualk-Throug^ Survay R sport* Industrial Hyqi image: ------- =. J'rCT HETA, Csliio Che-nical Co./' f's'-ry* OH., March 1°32. 15P" NTIS SO: P'H-;)3-1'J9-463 PRICE: 19.95 HHE NO: 30-147-1376 UNAVAIL NI05M HETA* Hopkins Agricultural Chemical Co., Atlanta* IL.* June 1933. 1 3PP HHE NO: 31-4*5-1323 UNAVAIL NIDSH HETA* Manufacturing Chemists* Inc.* Indianaool is* IN.* larch 1935. 47P=> NTIS NO: P3-35-117-561 PRIC=: S9.95 HHE NO: 32-257-1571 UNAVAIL NIOSH H1579 HEIA* Ozark National Scenic Siweraays* National Park Service* V^n Buren* MQ.* January 1934. 13PP NTIS NO: PB-85-179-132 PSICE: 59.95 MHE NO: 83-424-KC3 UNAVAIL NIOSM 13741 Industrial Hygi»ns Survey Report, worker exposures to Organotins* &ed Panther Che-nical Co.^ Clarksdale* MS.* June 25* 1355. 27»P NTIS NO: P3-36-117-504 PRICE: S9.95 CONTRACT NO: 200-32-2521 IWS NO: IU/136.12 UNAVAIL SIOSM N1301 HHE* Shell Cnamical Co.* Denver* CO.* July 19?2. 44P=» NTIS NO: P3-(»4-137-546 P?IC = : 19.95 HHE NO: 30-137-1145 UNAVAIL NIOSM I345J Trip Report* Walk-Through Survey ^eoort* Moy»r Chemcal Co.* San Jase* CA./ Juna 6* 1°77. 5P3 IUS NO: IW/030.11 UNAVAIL NIOSH Trip Deport* Walk-Through Survey "sport* Soilserve Plant* Salinas* CA., May 5-6* 1'77. 6PP IWS NO: IW/030.10 UN8VAIL NIOSH Walk-Through Survey Report* Vapor Products* Inc.* Orlando* FL.* July 19* 1933. ?5?P IUS NO: IW/125.23 U'JavAiL NIOSH Walk-Through Survay S?oor».* Chevron Cha-nicnl Ca.* Maryland Heights* MO.* May 24* 197S. OPP IWS NO: IU/0?J.12 UNAVAIL NIOSH A-251 image: ------- SU3J=CT Industrial Hygian? Walk-Through Survey Report* Aweron Company* Srea* C4., March* 19S4. NTIS NO: ?2-95-131-36:i P*ICE: «9.9? IWS NO: IW/143.17 UNAVAIL NIOSH H1125 HHE* Apollo Manufacturing Co., Grand Rapids* Ml. NTIS NO: P2-S3-1 5<»-666 P3ICE: S9.95 HHE NC: 31-114-977 UNAVAIL NIOSH H1199 HETS* Arwco Composites* Hartford City* IN., Fabruary 19^2. 25PP NTIS NO: P3-33-231-426 °RICE: S9.95 HHE NO: 31-143-1041 UNAVAIL NIOSH H172? HST4* Armstrong World Industries* Lancaster* PA.* January 1935. 42PP NTIS NO: P9-*6-105-5?2 P^ICE: 19.95 HHE NO: 33-451-1547 UN4VAIL NIOSH 10747 Industry-Wide Study Report* Walk-Through Survey* 3ecton Oickinson Labjiare* 3ecton* OicVinson and Co., Oxnard* CA., Aug. 27-23* 1934. 20P«» NTIS NO: P3-36-113-313 P'lCE: S9.9S IWS NO: I'W/o7.3J UNAVAIL NIOSH H1751 HETA* Carey Plastics Oivision* Tolsdo Molding and Die Corp., Carey* OH., May 1935. 2<»PP •E NO: 35-103-1593 JNAVAIL NIOSH 10719 Industrial Hygi^n? Survey Report* Personnel R3Cords Systa* Evaluation* E.^. Carpanter* Inc.* Richmond* VA.* July 1^34. 27t>p NTIS NO: P=l-^5-223-13.5 P'ICE: 59. v 5 IWS NO: IW/333.14 UNAVAIL NIOSH I07C7 Industrial Hygiene Walk-Through Survey Report* Cartex Corp.* Morrisville* PA.* April ?i* 1934. 14PP NTIS NO: P3-S5-222-14? PRICE: «9.?5 IWS NO: IW/33.15 UNAVAIL NTOS-i H1073 HHE* Exxon Chemical Ca., Po'.tsviila* °4. NTIS NO: P?-33-102-^i.9 PPICE: S-J.95 HHŁ N0: 79-j:j4-923 UNAV4IL MOSrl A-252 image: ------- SUiJiCT HETA* Globe Industry* Lo«*ll* IN.* November 1934. 1*>PP NTIS NO: PB-»5-2D5-304 P image: ------- SJ2JZCT INDEX HETA* Rubbermaid* Inc.* Wooster* Ort.* 1934. 13PP NTIS NO: Pa-°5-23S-2!;> "RICE: '9.9S HHt NO: f*-2?0-1523 UNAVAIL MOSH H14?1 META* Rubberinaid* Inc.* Wooster* OH., July 13^3. 34PP NTIS MO: P3-^4-m-05? PRICE: $«.9? HHE NO: 82-223-134C UMavAIL NIOSri I0379 Industrial Hygiene Survey Psport* A.0. Smith Inland Inc.* Little ?ock* A?.* February 1?Ł4. 19PP NTIS NO: P3-^4-2i1-751 PPIC=: S9.y> IWS NO: U/143.10 UNAVAIL NIOSH H1161 MHE* A.O. S«tlth- Inland* Inc.* Little Roclt* A3.* December 1931 (^ewxsed). 2QPP NTIS SO: P3-32-132-429 PRICE: 19.35 HHf. NO: 79-104-333 UNAVAIL NIOSH H1233 MME* Stephenson and Laayer* Inc., Grand Raoids* MI.* Marcn 1912. 16°P NTIS NO: P3-^3-1 '9-976 PRICE: ^.J5 HH= NO: 30-167-137? UNAVAIL NIOSH I0a52 Walk-Through Survey Raport* Armstrong Cork Co. Floor Plant* Lancaster* PA.* July 1?* 1976. 1 2PP US NO: In/333.1T UNAVilL NTOS-t 104^)2 rfalk-Through Survey Reoort* Industrial Hygi?ns and cpida-nioloqic Evaluation of 'otantial Cohort Exposed to R= Radiation fro1* Di a I metric neat Sealers* Travenol Lalior a* or ies* Inc., Mountain Hone* AR.* October 21* 1711. 17?3 IWS NO: IW/033.35 UNAV4IL NIOSH H1127 HHE* Weatherking Products* Inc.* East Greenwich* HI. 6PP NTIS NO: P3-33-l6l-2°3 P^ICE: <9.v5 rtHE NO: 31-004-975 UNAVAIL NIOSH A-254 image: ------- SUBJECT INDEX M5T4* Crystal Zoo* Sojldar* C3.«- April 1'35. 15PP Hrl = f40: ^-3?4-1580 Jeannette Slass Co.»- J P° NTIS NO: Pa-?2-1'i9-74l 9RICE: S'J.^ MME N3: '3-019-7^5 UNAVAIL NIOSH A-255 image: ------- 5U9JICT IN9EX REFERENCE 1C-3312 H1533 H?TA, Armco Inc., Baltimore/ 10. t =ebru3ry 1^34 13P3 NTIS NO: P3-55-179-3"d P=!ICE: ?3.9 HHE NO: 81-1=57-1417 UTJAVfAIL NIOSrt H1170 rlH = / Ssthlehe-n Stael Coro., Chesterton/ IN./ NTIS NO: ?1-i2-1Ł5-Jor ?9tCE: U. J HHE NO: 30-390-1216 UNavAIL MG3-t hi* Stael^ 3uffalo^ NY. l?ps NTIS NO: P3-82-172-l!fO P'ICE: HH= NO: 30-052-373 UNlVfllL N H094J HHE^ CF'.I Stael Cora.* °u3blor CO. ??=> NTIS NO: P3-12-H3-V55 '^TC5: 5 NC: 30-155-S24 JNflVilL H16S1 H=TA, C.F-4I. Steal/ Pueblo, CO./ October 1334. 14PP NTIS NO: P3-^5-23i-3A5 ??IC=: 35. ? HHE NO: 34-099-1514 UNAVaiL NIOSrt ruold Stsel COTO^HV/ »arren/ 01., January 1934. UPP NTIS NO: PS-25-1 79-224 P?IC5: J?.?1; HHE NO: 31-2*3-1173 'JNflVAIL NlOSi H15?0 HETA/ E moira-Oa tro it Steal Oivrsion/ u?nsfi?ld/ OH./ January 19^4. 25*P NTIS NJ: <»^-S5-1^1-329 P?IC = : 55.^5 HHE NO: c 1-434-14. 3 4 UNaVilL \I03rt H1&33 HET4/ Inland Steel Co., Eas* Cnica;o» IN., October 1;34. 3?P NTIS NO: P3-S5-20::-67o P?ICr: 59. ?5 HH= NO: ?1-157-1516 UNAVAIL NIOSH H1539 HETA/ Inland Steel Coro., East Cnicrgo/ IN./ October 13 i 3. 2?="» NTIS NO: PS-^5-1 77-541 P9IC1:: ?3.'5 HHE NO: =0-009-13?3 UNiVAIL NIOSH ^1534 HETA/ 1-il.anH Steel Co./ East Chicago/ IN./ October 19 3?. 15PP NTIS '40: °?-?5-1 72-747 P^ICE: SJ.?S HHE NO: '1-450-1373 JNAVAIL NIOSH A-256 image: ------- SUBJECT INDEX walk-Tnrougn Survey R?aort as part o * Sulfuric Acid Study at Inland Steel Co.* E. Chicago* IN.* March ?1* 1979. 11oo NTIS NO: B9-?Z-150-«J6 2 PPICf: J9.95 CONTRACT NO: 210-73-01":: IWS NO: IW/062.13 UN3VAIL NIOSH .,1Ł1o HHf* Inland Steel Co.* East Chicago* IN., March 193?. 6 P P NTIS NO: P3-33-193-432 P'ICE: i'.y5 HHE NO: 20-235-1D56 jNflvaiL \IOSH 1J53 HETfl* U.S. Steal Co. - Sou thwork 3 / Chicago* I L /• October 1<552. 11P» NTIS NO: P5-34-173-9C5 P^ICr: S<5.^5 NO: 31-2"9-1 231 UNaVfllL NIOSi rtO!70 HHE* J. S. Steal Tubing Specialties Center* Gary, IN. 24Pt> NTIS NO: P9-32-151-1Q1 P»IC?: I*. 55 HHE NO: 79-033-763 UNJVAIL NIOSH '113? HHE* United States St?el Sou t n*orle s* Chicago* IL.* January 19?2. 1CPP NTIS NO: P3-»2-1 96-759 P"iCE: ST. 95 HHE NO: ?1-0i4-1335 UNSV1IL NIOSn .0251 nalk-Through Survey Peoort ?s o?rt of Sulfuric Acid Study at Jones ?nd Laughlin St33l Core.* Pittsburgh, Pi.* =ebruary 25* 197'. 1i== IWS NO: iw/0o2.17 jsavAIL NIOSH TD26Z Walk-Through Survey S.?oort as part of Sulfu>-ic icid Study* United States Stsal Coro.* Oravosburg* Pa.* March 2* 1'7°. 16P° NTIS NO: P=i-S1-231-3-i2 PSICE: $ ; . * S IUS NO: IU/062.13 UNavalL NIOSH Walk-Through Survay Seoort as part of Sulfuric Acid Study at Bethlehen Steel Co.* Johnstoun* 'A.* March 1, 1979. 1?PP NTIS NO: P3-82-133-675 P^ICE: >v.Q? IWS NO: Iw/062.16 u^avAIL NIOSH HHE* Wheeling- Pittsburgh Stee* WV- 1303 STIS NO: P3-C2-15D-251 P5ICE: J9.95 HHE NO: 79-065-7^5 UNiVaiL NIOSH A-257 image: ------- SUaJECT INDEX C-3441 Inryco* Inc.* Islrosa 1731. 10PP NTIS NO: ?3-32-137-063 ??IC=: S9.95 E NO: 81-135-1307 U^avaiL NIOSH A-258 image: ------- 5U5JECT INDEX cx 3radford Western Core./ Arvada/ CO. ?PP NTIS NO: PB-"2-25?-112 ?2TCE: 59. ?5 HHŁ NO: SI-OIS-S'S UNAVAIL NlOSM TAx E1JD Corp.* Englaaaod, CO./ Hay 19B2. 5PP NTIS NJ: P5-S4-143-122 f^ICE: 1=>.<95 MHE NO: 22-0?^-11l2 HHŁ» Mat silbe st os Syste-ns^ Inc./ Namoei/ 10. UPP NTIS NO: P5-S3-157-933 PPIC5: S0.y MHE NO: 5D-199-97<» UNAVaiL NIOSrt A-259 image: ------- SU3JECT INDEX IC-3A71 h 1 G 5 1 HUE* Fansteel Elact'-o-natals* Inc.r North Chicago* IL. 9'? NT:S NO: P9-32-253-1"5 P3ICE: S-9.? E NO: 31-127--?01 JNftVaiL NIOSH 2 rlHEx sans»:eel Elec tro^stals* Inc.^ North Chicago, ILL. 3«>P HHE NO: ^0-1"53-747 UMVAIL 'UOSri Hlo77 HETAx Stanley Aviation Coro.^ Danvsr^ CO.x NO: »5-35-22Q-2?3 P5ICE: 3^.5 HIE ND: 34-2?6-1512 UN4VAIL NI05H H1Q39 HHEx Valley Chroma Platers* i-iy City* Ml. •jopp NTIS NO: P3-S2-25S-161 PRICE: N3: A-260 image: ------- SUBJECT IN3?X HHE* American Standard* Inc.* Louisville* NTIS NO: P3-23-127-373 PPICE: HHg NO: SO-1">?-V4d UNAVAIL META» 3osic Tool snd Suoply* 0?kland/ C*. NTIS NO: Pn-^5-203-205 PRICE: iJ.V HHŁ NO: ?4-1v:>-1527 UN8VAIL NUSi HETA* Modina Hanuf ac t ur i ng* McHenr/^ IL«^ "ay 1'S3. 11t>» NTIS NO: P3-a4-210-4<,2 P3ICE: S?.' MH5 NO: image: ------- SUBJECT INDEX H1293 icTft* Elactrodyne Co.* Batavia* OH.* Jun» 13?1. 12PP NTIS NO: P3-54-U1-431 PRICE: 5-^.^5 HHE NO: 31-425-1124 UNAVAIL NIOSH r(1443 H=T4x K° Manufacturing Co.* Minneapolis* M'J., March 1533. 25P° NTIS NO: PB-S4-233-71 7 PRICE: M1.?' HHE NO: 31-375-1277 UN4V4IL NIOSH A-262 image: ------- APPENDIX 12 SAMPLE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS STORAGE ORDINANCE DATA FROM THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA Data from the City of Santa Clara The City of Santa Clara had the most thorough computerization of its Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinance data in Santa Clara County as of March 1986. An example of the type of data available is shown below, including business description of the company, business license number, date of hazardous materials inventory, a list of the trade name of hazards stored, the corresponding chemical name of hazards, and a quantity code. A key to the quantity codes is shown beneath the data sample. Note that business description is not given by SIC code, and in fact is not necessarily uniform among similar firms. Also, chemical names are not always given for trade name products, as seen in the data sample. Company name is available in most cases. For more information, contact Larry Monette, Fire Department 777, Benton Street., Santa Clara, CA 95050; telephone: (408) 984-3059 or (408) 984-3084. A-339 image: ------- Out in*tl One nrc/PRINTED CIRCUITS Trttt N*m» ... . . . . . ENOUKA ETCH STARTER ENCUflA ETCH REPLENISHER Inv Date Bu» Lie 01/01/93 9704 Chemical Names AMMONIUM HYDROXIDE HYDROXIDE Inv Date Out Lie 10/06/93 1933 Qutinttft De*C nFG/PRINTED CIRCUITS Tr*de Nam* . . . • • NITRIC ACID HvO.°CCtJl.no rr *r'n SULFUR 1C AC 10 NICKEL SULFATE NICKtL CHLORIDE SODIUM HYDROXIDE SODIUM HYPOPHOSPHITE TR1 CLOR III ECOLOMNC 2001-LCD BOOSTER 3TACUFF 410 STAOUFF 421 ALUM1NUX 1000 .. ._ VANCLO Chemical N*m«i ,...,.. NITRIC ACID HYDROCHLORIC ACID SOLUTION .SULFUR 1C ACID......... NICKEL SULFATE NICKEL CHLORIDE SOOIUn HYDROXIDE SOLUTION_ SODIUn HYPOPHOSPHITE CHEHICAL NAMES NOT GIVEN CHEMICAL NAMES NOT GIVEN 'CHEMICAL NAMES NOT GIVEN CHEMICAL NAMES NOT GIVEN CHEMICAL NAMES NOT GIVCN CHEMICAL NAMES NOT GIVEN ON Guiu.ei* 0»*c HFC/PRINTED CIRCUITS Trade Name LIQUID NITROGEN .. _ NITROGEN R-IO. H-100 STRIPPER NnO DEVELOPER 'nv D«t»_ Ou.1 Lle_ 04/30/B3 3664 ON. LIQUID NITROGEN NITROGEN. COMPRESSED ETHANOLAMINE. ana taluCloni Qu>intt* Otic n^C/PPrNTFID CIRCUITS Trjd« Nam* ELECTROLESS COPPER SULFUR 1C ACID HAZARDOUS LIOUID/SOLIO_ Inv Date Du* Lie 09/09/93 8209 SPENT FUSING OIL Chtnlcal N*mti _ 'ALKALINE CORROSIVE Liouio.""n.V «. SULFURIC ACID WATER , 'PLATINO'SLUOGE OIL SLUDGE COPPER HAZARDOUS WASTE/n a. 1. OIL. PETROLEUM. N. 0. S. QUANTITY HANCE NUM3EK 1 RANGE AMOUNTS Up CO «nd Including 500 pounds for lelldj. 33 for liquids, «nd 200 cubic (etc *t ST? for compriixd B«cw«tn 300 and 3,000 pounds for solids, 33 and 330 (•lions for liquids, image: ------- SUBJECT INDEX M1322 HH = » p ederal-logul Metal Removal Tooling Division/ Chicago* IL. 12pP NTIS NO: P5-32-21 5-351 PPICE: S9.? NH: ^0-C5S-374 JNflVAIL N HrTA, N.P.C. 5xst»flis^ Inc.* Milford* NH./ NTIS NO: P=?-U-14<5-11 1 P^ICE: 59.^ HHE NO: 31-212-116? UN-WalL NIDSH A-263 image: ------- SU3J5CT IMDfX S5FE5FNC5 SIC-3559 H1257 rlETA* Aqus-Chamx Inc./ Milmaukee* UT.s ^?y 19-2. 35P» NTIS NO: P3-34-1 39-5H2 P=?IC = : t9.?5 HHŁ NO: =50-119-1103 U'JAVAIL NIOSM H1Q41 HHE* Pilgrim Glass Co.* Ceredox WV. 3»P NTIS NO: P3-a2-257-730 "KICE: 19.95 HHE NO: =1-239-391 UN image: ------- SUBJECT INDEX MET*/ Oalco electronics division/ General Motors/ Mi laauk NTIS NO: P8-35-163-5-56 P?TCr: «?.? MH5 NO: 32-323-13-)0 u^AVAIL NIOSH HHE/ Seattle Air Traffic Control Center ( F 4 a) , Auburn/ MA. 14PP NTIS NO: P«-^2-?15-25o P=?ICE: S^.? HHŁ NO: 30-052-352 IHAVML NIOSM A-265 image: ------- SUBJECT INDEX REFERENCE 13344 Industrial Hygiene Reoort Walk-Through Survey Saport* Soiare* Corp.* Rockville* MC.* *?y 3* 1?79. 13PP NTIS NO: P9-32-10.3-234 P^ICE: 19.95 IWS NO: IW/063.1? UNAVAIL NIOSH I3o37 Industrial Hygiens Walk-Throu gn Surv ?y Deport* Litton Electron Turta Diwisionx Scin Ccirlos* CA. 22P» NTIS NO: 03-33-110-333 PPICE: ^9.5S IWS NO: IW/113.13 UN4VAIL NIDSrt I0o33 Industrial Hygiene Walk-Through Survey bionics* Inc.* Westliury* NY. 13'° NTIS NO: PB-33-111-137 P5IC5: J3.-J IWS NO: IW/113.13 USavAIL MOSH I0o31 Industrial Hygiana Walk-Through Surv9y ^soortx RCA, Somerville* NJ. 15PP NTIS NO: P3-33-111-195 P^ICE: S^.? IWS NO: IW/113.1? UN4VAIL Industrial' Hygiene Walk-Through Survey Intel Coro... Santa Clara/ CA. 21 3' NTIS NO: P3-33-111-211 P'ICE: 59. IWS NO: IW/113.17 UNAVAIL NIOS ID593 Industrial Hygiena Walk-Tnrough Survey Germanium Pomer Devices Corp.* Andov?r» MA. 1 909 NTIS NO: P3-33-133-33" P'ICE: «9. IWS NO: IW/113.12 UNAVAIL NIOS I060G Industrial Hygiene Walk-Through Surv?y Microjiava Associates* Inc..- Burlington* 4CJPP NTIS NO: ??-33-155-320 P^ICE: IWS NO: 'lW/113.11 UNAVAIL 13556 Industrial Hyqianj Walk-Through Survay Deport* Sensor Technology* Inc.* Ch?tsj»or*. h* CA., March 15* 1977. 14P" IWS H?: IW/Q53.10 UNAVAIL NI3SH Industrial Hygiene Walk-Through Survey Rs Spactrolah* Inc.* Sylmar* CA.* March 16* 1977. IWS N?: IW/3o3.12 UNAVAIL A-266 image: ------- SU3JtCT INDEX Industrial Hygi«n* Walk-Through Survey ?eoort, Goticsl Coating Laboratory, Inc., City of Industry, CA., Novenlier 2, 1=73. 21Pa IWS NO: IW/068.16 JNAVAIL NlQSrt Industrial Hyoien- Walk-Tnrouan Survey Report, Motorola* Inc., Semiconductor Grouo, Phoenix, IWS NO: !W/06cJ.15 UNAVAIL NIO M1267 HŁTA, Inmas Corp., Colorado Springs, CO., M?y NTIS NO: P3-3;-140 HHE NO: ;1-31°-1114 UfJAVAIL NIOSH HETA, Milk's C a«o Industry, 3onesteel, SD., Jun3-?5-1 50-31 3 P5IC5: ly.'^ HHE NO: 33-269-1430 • UNAVSIL MOS-i HU22 HETA, Solid State Scientific, Inc., Hont gomery v i 1 1 a, PA., February 1V23. 11P = NTIS MO: P5-94-23:'-733 PRICE: 19. ?5 HHE NO: 30-123-1233 UNAVAIL NIOSH A-267 image: ------- SU3JECT IVOEX REFERENCE iIC-3679 H3349 me* Sundstr-and Data Control, Redmond* WA. 5PP NTIS NO: P3-32-1J3-250 P*ICE: V9.9 HHŁ NO: ^0-226-761 UNOVAIL NIOSH HETA, Syntrsx Corp., Eatontown, NJ.^ P9bru?ry 19B2. 14PP NTIS NO: P3-,?3-1 ^^-424 PTCE: 19.9 HH5 NO: n-370-1350 UN/WAIL NIOSH A-268 image: ------- SUBJECT iNDrX P.EPŁC=NCE HETA, American Transportation Coro., ASH., January 1934. 51?P NTIS NO: P3-35-179-372 PSICE: HHE NO: 32-325-1413 UNAVAIL HETa, FMC Cora., Tiatonx IN., August 1932. 3 ? P3 UTIS NO: Pe-'JA-UP-lOA PRICE: ^.' HHE ND: 31-2Ł9-11o7 UNAVAIL N:OS^ MHf, ^ayes Albion Corp., So-?nc ar w il 1 a/ 0M. 17?" NTIS NO: P3-53-102-397 ?«ICE: S^.^' NO: 31-136-'2<. USiVJIL NIQSH H1Q13 MHE, Hendrictcson Honu f ec tur i nq Co., Lyons, IL opp NTIS N3: P5-32-21 5-260 P'ICE: ^ MH= NO: =0-Oi2-?63 USAVAIL NIO A-269 image: ------- SUBJECT INDEX REFERENCE SIC-3311 H115? HŁTA, Yellow Springs Ins-truant Co.* Yelloa Springs^ OH., 0?C9*ljar 1931. O'P NTIS NO: P3-32-H5-950 P^TCE: S9.9 HHc N9: 31-071-1015 UNflV&IL NIOSH A-270 image: ------- ,RC I OBS SIC RCGSTRD NAME CITV=SAN JOSE ADDRESS CITY ZIP JIEMPLYD fAFECTD UNION CAHC I M t_n 81 82 83 81 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 91 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 101 105 106 107 108 109 10 11 12 13 11 15 16 17 18 19 120 121 122 123 121 125 126 127 128 129 130 2270 1623 1761 7539 8072 8211 8222 1123 1511 1512 1512 1512 1623 1623 1711 1712 1712 1712 1712 1712 1712 1752 1752 1752 1752 1752 1761 2085 2651 2891 2911 2951 3272 3111 3573 3573 3573 3573 3573 3573 3573 3573 3573 3573 3573 3573 3573 3573 3573 3573 OCT82 APR78 SEP77 AUG77 MAY77 SEP77 MAY78 DEC82 FEB61 JUL81 APR81 JAN81 JUN79 AUG77 SEP77 MAY80 SEP77 SEP77 MAY77 MAY78 SEP77 SEP77 SEP77 SEP77 SEP77 AUG77 SEP77 JUN79 SEP77 AUG77 SEP77 AUG77 MAY 7 7 AUG77 SEP81 SEP81 SEP81 SEP81 SEP81 SEP81 SEP81 SEP81 SEP81 SEP81 SEP81 SEP81 SEP81 SEP81 SEP81 SEP81 BURKE INDUSTRIES INC J k W PIPELINES INC MASON ROOFING ADRIAN KLEIN CO INTERNATIONAL DENTAL CERAMICS EDISON HIGH SCHOOL EVERGREEN VALLEY COLLEGE GRANITE ROCK COMPANY SOUTH BAY CONSTRUCTION HGRS ASBESTOS CONTROL TECHNOLOGY WERT CONSTRUCTION WESTERN SPECIALTY PRODUCTS PIAZZA CONST CO WEST VALLEYCONSTRUCTIONCOMPANY COMFORT HEATING k AIR CONDIT10 ASBESTOS CONTROL CO J ft J PLASTERING MISSION PLASTERING CO PRE FINISHED WALLBOARD CO ROLLIE R FRENCH INC ZASLONA PLASTERING INC ANTHONY'S INTERIORS INC ANTHONY'S INTERIORS INC BENNY'S CARPET SERVICE BENNY'S CARPET SERVICE TERA-LITE HFC CO INC RUSH ROOFING CO INC PAUL MASSON VINEYARDS AMERICAN CAN CO DAP INC CHEVRON USA INC REED AND GRAHAM INC FOREMOST-MCKESSON BLDG PRODUCT W A CALL MFC CO INC IBM INSTRUMENTS INC IBM INSTRUMENTS INC IBM INSTRUMENTS INC IBM INSTRUMENTS INC IBM INSTRUMENTS INC IBM INSTRUMENTS INC IBM INSTRUMENTS INC IBM INSTRUMENTS INC IBM INSTRUMENTS INC IBM INSTRUMENTS INC IBM INSTRUMENTS INC IBM INSTRUMENTS INC IBM INSTRUMENTS INC IBM INSTRUMENTS INC IBM INSTRUMENTS INC IBM INSTRUMENTS INC 2250 SOUTH TENTH STREET 976 STOCKTON AVE 539 MINNESOTA AVE 121 S FIRST ST 1888 SARATOGA AVE SUITE 105 1050 N 5TH ST 3095 YERBA BUENA ROAD 11711 BERRYESSA ROAD 1383 ROSALIA AVE P 0 BOX 6161 113 MENKER AVE 1970 MONTEREY RD POB 6119 985 BLOSSOM HILL RDBOX 23550 580 MCGUNCY LN BOX 6059 152 COBLE LANE PO BOX 7375 7180 HEATHERWOOD OR 1656 JUANITA AVE 138 PERRYMONT AVE 1060 N 5TH ST 6692 LEYLAND PARK OR 101 EAST HEDDING STREET 101 EAST HEDDING STREET 995 LONUS ST 995 LONUS ST 163 SOUTH 10TH ST 777 PARK AVE 915 STORY RD 1598 S FIRST ST 520 NO MARBURG WAY 1020 BERRYESSA RD 690 SUNOL ST BOX 5910 985 S SIXTH ST 1710 ROGERS AVE 10 WEST BROKAW ROAD 10 WEST BROKAW ROAD 10 WEST BROKAW ROAD 10 WEST BROKAW ROAD 10 WEST BROKAW ROAD 10 WEST BROKAW ROAD 10 WEST BROKAW ROAD 10 WEST BROKAW ROAD 10 WEST BHOKAW ROAD 10 WEST BHOKAW ROAD 10 WEST BROKAW ROAD 10 WEST BROKAW ROAD 10 WEST BROKAW ROAD 10 WEST BROKAW ROAD 10 WEST BROKAW ROAD 10 WEST BROKAW ROAD SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE SAN JOSE CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA 95112 95110 95125 95113 95729 95112 95121 95133 95130 95150 95128 95150 95153 95008 95111 95150 95129 95111 95125 95112 95120 95112 95112 95126 95126 95112 95126 95122 95110 95133 95133 95150 95112 95712 95110 95110 95110 95110 95110 95110 95110 95110 95110 951 10 95110 95110 95110 95110 95110 95110 550 9 3 3 9 119 19 19 20 4 5 12 9 19 3 5 9 9 9 9 3 10 10 10 10 9 3 10 20 75 20000 9 19 9 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 too too 100 100 100 15 5 1 3 6 2 2 33 2 1 3 7 6 20 2 <4 It 1 1 9 1 10 10 10 10 1 3 2 10 19 1 5 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 V N N N N N V N N N N Y Y N Y N Y Y Y Y N Y Y Y Y N N Y N Y N Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 16 15 16 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 1 2 3 1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 11 15 16 (SAN JOSE REGISTRANTS CONTINUED NEXT PACE) image: ------- REGISTERED CARCINOGEN USERS IN SCLARA COUNTY OBS SIC RECSTRD NAME 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 > 156 K, 157 S '58 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 3644 3674 3674 3674 3829 4111 4131 4212 4212 4932 4953 4953 5013 5039 5063 5148 5148 5148 5251 5411 5531 5531 5531 5531 6142 6142 6142 6142 6142 7216 7349 7391 7394 7539 8072 8072 8072 8072 8072 8072 8073 8211 8211 8211 8211 8222 9511 3674 FFB81 APR84 OCT82 OCT84 SEPflO MAY84 AUG77 MAR82 AUG77 AUG77 SEP77 SEP77 AUG77 JUL77 NOV81 HAR82 MAY82 MAR82 JAN83 APR82 AUG77 AUG77 SEP77 SEP77 SEP77 SEP77 SEP77 SEP77 SEP77 DEC84 OCT82 OCT84 SEP77 SEP77 SEP77 JUL77 JUL77 JUL77 SEP77 JAN78 SEP77 SEP77 SEP77 SEP77 SEP77 APR78 MAY78 OCT82 PIPE SHIELDS CORP CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORP SEEQ TECHNOLOGY INC VLSI TECHNOLOGY INC HEWLETT PACKARD SANTA CLARA COUNTY TRANSIT GREYHOUND LINES WEST AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL INC RED LINE CARRIERS INC JIM MAEZ CHEVRON BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES OF INDUSTRIAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVI BAYSHORE FRICTION MATERIALS COMMERCIAL BUILDING SUPPLY GENERAL ELECTRIC B/C PRODUCE INC DEL GRANDE PRODUCE CO ROYAL FOODS CO INC ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE P W SUPERMARKETS INC ABC MOBILE BRAKE ALLIED AUTO STORES |2 UNITED AUTO STORES UNITED AUTO STORES IBM CORP IBM CORP IBM CORP IBM CORP IBM CORP CERTIFIED GARMENT & LINEN GSA BUILDING OPERATIONS CONDUCT IHER CORP LEASING SYSTEMS MOBILE BRAKE SALES AND SERVICE CONTINENTAL DENTAL LAB DEWHIRST DENTAL LAB HI GRADE DENTAL LAB INC HARU DENTAL LAB NAMES DENTAL LABORATORY PARK MERIDIAN DENTAL LAB HI TEC DENTAL CERAMICS GUNDERSON HIGH SCHOOL LINCOLN HIGH SCHOOL SAN JOSE HIGH SCHOOL WILLOW GLENN HIGH SCHOOL SAN JOSE CITY COLLEGE CALIF WATER SERVICE COMPANY IMP INTERNA MICROELECTRONIC PR - CITY=SAN JOSE CA (CONTINUED) ADDRESS 380 TERRAINE ST 3901 NORTH FIRST ST 1849 FORTUNE DRIVE 1101 MC KAY 350 W TRIMBLE RD 1555 BERGER DR BLDG 2 70 ALMADEN AVE 757 COMMERCIAL ST 1999 S SEVENTH ST 2801 SO WHITE RD BOX 1987 3010 2ANKER RD 1192 BAYSHORE HWY 438 PERRYMOUNT AVE 175 CURTNER AVE 1650 OLD BAYSHORE 335 E TAYLOR STREET 1325 E JULIAN ST 1555 SO SEVENTH ST 2277 ALUM ROCK AVE 666 G STOCKTON AV 1359 REDMOND AVENUE 1717 STORY ROAD 4580 ALMADEN 5600 COTTLE RD 5600 COTTLE RD 5600 COTTLE RD 5600 COTTLE RD 5600 COTTLE RD 519 HORNING ,1555 BERGER DR. , BLDG 2 2160 OAKLAND ROAD 1346 EAST TAYLOR ST 4614 PRINCE ROYAL PL 1175 SARATOGA AVE SU 2 14424 UNION AVE 1888 SARATOGA AVE SUITE 105 202 NO BASCOH AVE 898 SO SEVENTH ST 1201 PARK AVE 827 BLOSSOM HILL RD.SUITE100 622 GAUNDABERT LN 555 DANA AVE 275 N 24TH ST 2001 COriLE AVENUE 2100 MOORPARK AV 1720 NORTH FIRST ST 2830 NO FIRST STREET CITY ZIP IEMPLYD IAFECTD UNION CARC SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN SAN JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE JOSE CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA 95110 95134 95131 95131 95131 95112 95110 95112 95112 95122 95109 95131 95112 95125 95125 95112 95112 95116 95112 95125 95126 95120 95122 95118 95193 95193 95193 95193 95193 95112 95112 95131 95133 95136 95129 95124 95129 95128 95117 95126 95123 95136 95126 95116 95125 95128 95110 95134 20 104 125 250 1500 75 49 15 19 3 49 5 4 19 499 120 5 70 10 20 1 2 9 9 999 999 999 999 999 3 500 18 9 3 9 3 3 3 3 3 3 350 350 350 19 150 20 150 15 5 a 10 2 6 4 8 2 1 4 5 4 15 490 12 5 5 2 10 1 2 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 1 500 1 4 1 5 2 3 1 2 2 3 2 2 2 4 2 5 4 N N N N N Y Y N N N Y N N N Y N N Y N N N N N N N N N N N N Y N N N N N N Y N N N Y N Y N Y N N 15 20 20 20 20 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 21 21 21 15 21 15 15 15 15 1 2 3 7 15 15 15 19 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 20 image: ------- RCC- . _ . _HCO C I OBS SIC RtGSTRO 179 180 181 182 183 181 165 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 191 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 > 201 " 205 Ł 206 ^j 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 211 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 P21 P25 L'26 227 ^28 5211 1761 3196 7996 1531 1511 1511 1711 1711 1713 1752 2822 2851 3296 3611 3611 3662 3670 3671 3671 3671 3671 3671 3671 3671 3671 3671 3671 3671 3671 3679 3679 3679 3679 3679 3679 3732 1212 1212 1391 1953 5039 7392 7397 7539 7539 7539 7539 3671 3671 OCT77 SEP77 NOV77 DEC77 SEP77 SEP77 .JUN82 FEB81 SEP77 SEP77 OCT77 JUL77 JUN77 MAY78 JUL79 JUL79 JUL79 SEP77 MAYS 3 AUG83 MAY81 MAR82 FEB81 JUN78 JUN80 JAN80 JUN81 SEP81 MAY80 FEB82 JAN78 JAN78 JAN78 JAN78 JUL77 MAR82 SEP77 AUG77 JUL77 SEP78 JUL83 SEP77 JUL83 APR83 SEP77 SEP77 SEP77 SEP77 KOVB3 OCI83 NAME PROVENZANO BROS ALCAL ROOFING & INSULATION KEYSTONE STEEL kWIRE CO HARRIOTTS GREAT AMERICA OITZ CRANE NOR-CAL INDUSTRIAL FLOORS LIN SCHMALTZ CONSTRUCTION CO INC RICES PLUMBING fc HEATING WEATHER SYSTEMS MECHANICAL INC DELLA MAGGIORE TILE INC ACS CARPETS k INTERIORS FLEX FORMERS TECHNICAL COATINGS CO OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP HEWLETT PACKARD CO HEWLETT PACKARD CO VARIAN ASSOCIATES INC MEMOREX CORP AMERICAN MICROSYSTEMS INC APPLIED IMPLANT TECHNOLOGY DEXCEL INC FAIRCHILD CAMERA IE INSTRH CORP GOULD ELECTRONICS INTEL CORP INTEL CORP INTERSIL INC MODERN ELECTROSYSTEHS INC NBK CORPORATION PRECISION MONOLITH ICS SYNERTEK AMI AMERICAN MICROSYSTEMS INC AMI AMERICAN MICROSYSTEMS INC AMI AMERICAN MICROSYSTEMS INC AMI AMERICAN MICROSYSTEMS INC AVANTEK INC AVANTEK INC LAND N1 SEA CRAFT INC CHAS F GAGLIASSO TRUCKING SVC PAPER TRANSPORT CO FMC CORP CHEMICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT INC MONARCH CERAMIC TILE SALES INC SAFETY SPECIALISTS INC DAIALAB INC AMERICAN AUTO AMERICAN lUfO AMERICAN IUTO UNI-SERV COBILE BRAKE SERVICE LSI LOGIC CORPORATION MICRO POWER SYSTEMS, INC. CITV=SANTA CLARA CA • ADDRESS 185O OELLA CRUZ BLVD 1731 GRANT ST PO BOX 210 651 WALSH AVE 2101 AGNEW ROAD BOX1776 2295 DE LA CRUZ BLVD l|i|7 GREENWOOD DR 2378 WALSH AVE SUITE C 2301 LAFAYETTE ST 309 LAURELWOOD RD fig 868 PARKER ST 2150 SCOTT BLVD 3339 EDWARD AVE 1000 WALSH AVE BOX 89 5301 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 5301 STEVENS CREEK BLVD 3251 OLCOTT ST 1200 MEMOREX DR 3800 HOMESTEAD ROAD 29>40 KIFER ROAD 2285 C MARTIN AVE 3105 ALFRED ST 2285 C MARTIN AVE 3065 BOWERS AVE 3065 BOWERS AVE 3250 SCOTT BLVD 2191 LAURELWOOD RD 3020 OLCOTT STREET 1500 SPACE PARK DR 3001 STENDER WAY 3800 HOMESTEAD RD 3800 HOMESTEAD RD 3800 HOMESTEAD RD 3800 HOMESTEAD RD 3175 BOWERS AVE 3175 BOWERS AVE 720 LAURELWOOD RD BOX I4M014 751 MARTIN AVE 1185 COLEMAN AVE BX 580 715 COMSTOCK STREET 1129 RICHARD AVE P 0 BOX 1120 2900 CORVIN DRIVE 1373 KOOSER ROAO 101 E SANTA CLARA 115 F CAMPBFI.L AVE 2019 STAATS WAY 3105 ALfRED ST 3151 JAY STREET CITY ZIP IEMPLYD IAFECTD UNION CARC SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SANTA SAN1A SANIA SANIA SANTA SANTA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CLARA Cl ARA CLARA CLARA CLARA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA 95050 95052 95051 95052 95050 95050 95051 95050 95050 95050 95050 95050 95050 95052 95050 95050 95050 95052 95051 95051 95050 95050 95050 95051 95051 95051 95051 95051 95050 95051 95051 95051 95051 95051 95051 95051 95050 95051 95050 95052 95050 95050 95051 95051 95113 95113 95113 95050 95050 95050 19 3 19 3 19 10 10 6 8 19 7 1 11 8 19 19 9 19 1210 100 6 2000 80 8000 8000 600 115 100 10 300 199 199 199 199 99 99 10 3 9 150 35 3 26 6 2 2 2 3 12 375 10 3 21 1 19 1 1 2 1 12 7 1 12 1 28 28 1 19 16 2 6 16 7 300 19 600 8 8 5 35 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 2 5 1 10 2 1 2 2 2 2 3 8 2 N N Y N N N Y Y Y Y N N N Y Y Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Y N N N N N N N N Y N 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 13 16 15 15 20 20 15 20 20 20 20 20 15 20 20 20 20 20 20 5 11 12 20 16 20 15 15 15 3 15 15 15 20 15 15 15 15 20 20 image: ------- REGISTERED CARCINOGEN USERS IN SCLARA COUNTY OBS SIC REGSTRD NAME ADDRESS CITY 229 1799 AUCaO A R TRAMMEL!. INSULATION 14012 SOBEY MEADOWS CT SARATOGA 230 2085 JUN79 PAUL MASSON VINEYARDS 13150 SARATOGA AVE BOX 97 SARATOGA 231 8222 OCT77 WEST VALLEY JOINT COMM COLLEGE 14000 FRUIT VALE AVE OBS SIC REGSTRD NAME ADDRESS 232 8222 MAR80 STANFORD UNIVERSITY 71 ENCINA HALL 233 8222 MAR80 STANFORD UNIVERSITY 71 ENCINA HALL 23<4 8922 SEP79 CARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHIN 290 PANAMA ST OBS SIC RECSTRD NAME ADDRESS SARATOGA CITY STANFORD CA STANFORD CA STANFORD CA CITY 235 1791 OCT82 YOUNGS IRON WORKS INC 9133 DE GARHO AVENUE SUN VALLEY CA 1 KJ VO CD OBS SIC REGSTRD NAME ADDRESS 236 3573 JUL81 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 901 THOMPSON PL 7 237 3825 JAN77 HEWLETT PACKARD CO 971 E ARQUES AVE 238 1711 DEC83 B & C INSULATION 1112 BORREGAS AVE 239 1711 AUG77 PENINSULA TRANE A/C CO 380 SAN ALESO AVE 210 1711 AUG80 VIRGIL JOHNSON HEATING * SHMTL 651 E ARQUES AVE 211 1731 JUL81 CUPERTINO ELECTRIC INC 712 EAST EVELYN AVE 212 3361 APR81 A L JOHNSON CO 1255 BIRCHWOOD DR 243 3573 JUL81 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC 915 DEGUIGNE AVE 244 3573 SEP80 AMDAHL CORPORATION 1250 E ARQUES AVE 215 3612 JUN77 WESTINCHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP HENDY AVE 246 3612 JUN77 WEST INGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP HENDY AVE 247 3674 JAN82 DATA GENERAL CORP 433 N MATHILDA AVE 248 3674 JAN80 INTERSIL INC 1276 HAMMERWOOD AVE 249 3679 APR81 EXAR INTEGRATED SYSTEMS INC 750 PALOMAR AVE 250 3679 HAY81 NARDA MICROWAVE CORP 410 LAKESIDE DR 251 3761 AUG77 LOCKHEED MISSILES & SPACE CO 1111 LOCKHEED WAY 252 3761 AUG77 LOCKHEED MISSILES fc SPACE CO 1111 LOCKHEED WAY 253 3764 SEP77 UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP. 1050 E AKQUES AVE BOX 254 3832 JUN77 FINNIGAN CORP 845 W MAUDE 255 3832 AUG77 FINNICAN CORP 845 WEST MAUDE AVE CITY SUNNYVALE SUNNYVALE SUNNYVALE SUNNYVALE SUNNYVALE SUNNYVALE SUNNYVALE SUNNYVALE SUNNYVALE SUNNYVALE SUNNYVALE SUNNYVALE SUNNYVALE SUNNYVALE SUNNYVALE SUNNYVALE SUNNYVALE 358 SUNNYVALE SUNNYVALE SUNNYVALE 256 5211 APR78 PINE CONE LUMBER CO INC 695 E EVELYN AVE PO 61207 SUNNYVALE 257 7699 SEP77 ATLAS FURNACE CO 155 COMMERCIAL ST 258 3662 JUL77 CALIF MICROWAVE INC NORTH MATHILDA & WESTMAUDE AVE 259 8211 SEP77 FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DIST BOX F 260 9511 APR82 CITY OF SUNNYVALE 1444 BORREGAS AVE SUNNYVALE ZIP IEMPLYD CA 95070 2 CA 95070 CA 95070 ZIP 94305 94305 94305 ZIP 91352 IEMPLYD 350 350 19 19 9 IAFECTD 2 12 4 UNION N Y Y IAFECTD UNION 2 2 i IEMPLYD IAFECTO 100 ZIP IEMPLYO CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA CA 990 ALMANN AVE CA SUNNYVALE SUNNYVALE CA CA 94086 94086 94089 94086 94086 94086 94086 94086 94086 94088 94088 94086 94086 94086 94086 94086 94086 94086 94086 94086 94088 94086 94086 94087 94088 a. Carcinogen-using firms in Santa Clara County registered with the Cali fornia Division of Health, pursuant to the Occupational Carcinogen Control Act of listings. b. Observation number (for tabulation in this Appendix only) . c. . Standard Industrial Classification code (for key to SIC's, see d. Date registered. e. Number of total employees at registered firm. 1976, as of June, 1985. 3 999 5 9 4 30 150 3 2100 200 200 500 600 115 6 16 16 99 99 99 57 5 11 999 108 3 fAFECTD 22 1 2 4 4 4 1 3 2 6 6 25 600 12 2 4 4 50 4 4 15 1 11 5 a N N Y UNION N UNION N Y Y Y N N N N N Y Y N N N N Y Y Y N N Y Y N Y Y CARC 15 15 15 CARC 16 20 20 CARC 15 CARC 20 15 15 15 15 15 13 20 20 13 15 20 20 20 20 13 15 15 9 9 15 15 15 15 20 Occupational Safety and May contain obsolete Appendix 11). image: ------- f. Number of employees potentially exposed to carcinogen. g. Union status (yes/no): indicates whether employees belong to a union. h. Carcinogen codes: 1 2-Acetylaminofluorene 2 4-Aminodiphenyl 3 Benzidine (and its salts) 4 3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine (and its salts) 5 4-Dimethylaminoazobenzene 6 alpha-Naphthylamine 7 beta-Naphthylamine 8 4-Nitrobiphenyl 9 N-Nitrosodimethylamine 10 beta-Propiolactone 11 bis-Chloromethyl Ether 12 Methyl Chloromethyl Ether 13 4.4'-Methylene bis (2Chloroaniline) (MBOCA) 14 Ethylenimine 15 Asbestos 16 Vinyl Chloride 17 Coke Oven Emissions 18 l,2-Dibromo-3Chloropropane 19 Acrylonitrile 20 Inorganic Arsenic 21 Ethylene Dibromide (EDB) image: ------- Locnl Fire Department Contacts: Campbell: Mike Young, (408) 866-2100 Los Gatos/ Cupertino: Ken Waldevogel, Fire Chief, (408) 378-4010 Milpitas: Patty Joki or Bob Webster, (408) 942-2383 Morgantown: Fire Chief Spenser or Sharon Coleman Skinner, (408) 779-7231 Mountain View: Frank Moe, Fire Marshall, or Maryann Izumi, (415) 966-6378 San Jose: Joe Afong, (408) 277-4659 Santa Clara: Larry Minet or Robert Campbell, (408) 984-3084 Santa Clara County: Lee Esquibel, Office of Hazardous Materials, County Depart- ment of Public Health, (408) 299-6930 5. Kaiser-Permnnente Health Plan of Northern California. Kaiser-Permanente Health Plan of Northern California is a comprehensive health plan with centralized computer data bases. In 1978, Kaiser conducted a pilot study of cancer rates among specific occupational groups in its membership. This study was primarily performed to test the research technique, and did not generate clear-cut results. No report was produced from the study. This type of study, however, is a potentially valuable tool for identifying illness patterns by occupation and industry. Kaiser and other comprehenshe health plans with members in Santa Clara County offer excellent study populations, insofar as their data systems are extensive and centralized, their membership is largely employment based (i.e. members join through their employer), and members remain in the health plan over long periods of time. For information on the Kaiser Occuptional Study contact: Dr. Robert Hiatt, Department of Medical Methods Research, 3451 Piedmont Avenue, Oakland, CA 94611. Tele phone: (415) 428-6713. A-321 image: ------- treatment agency issues permits and does monitoring for several districts and cities. These include Santa Clara City and San Jose, the unincorporated areas of sanitation districts 2 and 3, the Burbank and Sunol districts, and district 4 which covers Campbell, Monte Cerrino, Los Gatos, and Saratoga. They also monitor Cupertino and Milpitas. The Center has on file completed questionnaires data (even for companies not permitted) and permit applications. The information they contain includes type and quantity of waste generated, a chemical inventory, the industrial process, pretreatment systems, if appropriate, and an SIC code. They have approximately 300 to 350 files; the questionnaires date back to the mid-50's, but permitting did not begin before 1982. These files ae not computerized and are not readily accessible to the public. In addition to the permit files, the Center keeps discharge records. Again access is not readily available to the public. Any requests to see these records or the permit files must go through the City Attorney. A summary of the discharge records is available however in the form of an annual report. 4. Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinances. These ordinances are administered by local fire departments and, for Los Altos Hills, Monte Sereno, Saratoga, and unincorporated areas, by the Office of Hazardous Materials in the Santa Clara County Health Department. Under the ordinances, facilities storing hazardous materials in quantities greater than 500 pounds in weight for solids, greater than 55 gallons for liquids, or greater than 200 cubic feet for compressed gases must obtain a permit. To obtain a permit, a facility must submit a Hazardous Materials Inventory statement (HMIS), with the following information: 1) for non-wastes - the generic chemical name, common/trade name, major constituents for mixtures, the manufacturer, United Nations (UN) or North America (NA) number, if available, and the hazard class or classes and the material safety data sheet or equivalent information as required by the county; 2) for wastes - the Department of Health Services manifest for wastes or equivalent information, and the hazard class or classes; and 3) the aggregate quantity stored at a facility. In addition, the HMIS should include a carcinogen identification form indicating storage of any quantity of any carcinogen listed in Sections 5208-5215 and Section 5219 of Title 8 of the California Administrative Code. This provision can be satisfied with a copy of the carcinogen registration form submitted to the California DIR. The HMIS, with the exception of trade secrets, is public record. The Hazardous Materials Management Plan, which must also be filed with each application for a permit, provides the name and address of the facility, the number of employees and the principal business activity. In case a hazardous material is stored in a lower quantity than that specified by the HMIS, a short form HMMP can be filed - this does not include the inventory statement but does include the carcinogen identification form. The HMMP is public record except for trade secrets and security related information. The Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinances give the county and municipalities the right, at their discretion, to conduct inspections to ascertain complianct with the o:di -UK... Examination of inspection records for violations may indicate firms with potential occupational exposures either due to direct employee exposure from storage leaks, or by suggesting a bad actor firm, i.e. a firm whose bad record in hazardous materials storage might indicate similar negligence in employee exposure. The data available from individual municipalities and from the county vary, both in terms of the current level of affected facilities reporting, and of the degree to which records are computerized. As noted in Section 2 of this report, lack of computerization and absence of standardized industry coding (such as SIC) limits the utility of these data. A-320 image: ------- southern part of Santa Clara County), contact: 1102-A Laurel Lane, San Luis Obispo, CA 94301, telephone: (805) 549-3147. mrA.1 AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS I Snnta Clara Countv Agricultural Commissioner's Office. The Agricultural Commissioner keeps Pesticide Use Reports and Reports of Pesticide Illness- (for explanations of these data, see the sections on the California Department of Food and Agriculture in Section 2 of this report, and in this Appendix. Contact: 1553 Berges Drive, Bldg. 1, San Jose, CA 95112. Telephone: (408) 299-2171. 2. fonts Clara Center for Occupational Safety and Health (SCCOSH). the Project on Health and Safety in Electronics (PHASE), and the Silicon Valley Toxics Coalmen (SVTC ). SCCOSH provides health effects information on toxic substances, supplies movies and slides on occupational health and safety, and furnishes medical and legal referrals. The Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition is a current SCCOSH project. SCCOSH can also provide materials developed by PHASE. PHASE was an independent non-profit education project working under the auspices of SCCOSH and supported by a grant from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). In April of 1979, PHASE established the Electronics Hazard Hotline, a confidential source of technical information about the industry's substances and processes, assistance in identifying potential hazards, medical and legal referrals, and help to workers in solving health and safety problems. A N10SH Technical Report, the Hazard Assessment of the Electronic Component Manufacturing Industry (NIOSH Publication No. 85-100) included a report summarizing relevant data from 527 of the 700 calls received over the first 18 months of the Hotline's operation. This is an informal sample and therefore cannot be used for any statistical conclusions, but it offers anecdotal information on the hazards of the industry. The largest category of complaints concerned exposure to chemical substances, primarily solvents, followed by acids and metals. The next largest category of complaints was medical problems, including inquiries about respiratory, reproductive, gastrointestinal, nervous system and skin problems. The Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition is a current SCCOSH project. Contact: SCCOSH, 361 Willow St., No. 3, San Jose, CA 95110. Telephone: (408) 998-4050. Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition. Telephone: (415) 287-6707. ^ Local Sanitary Districts and Agencies. Local sanitary districts, city sanitary agencies, and city coalitions in Santa Clara County monitor industrial waste disposal to sanitary sewers. These monitoring records form another potential data source regarding substances and quantities used in individual firms and municipalities. Permits to discharge are actually issued by sewage treatment Plants which are owned by the districts or cities, or privately. An example of how this system works is the Santa Clara - San Jose Water Pollution Control Center. This sewage A-319 image: ------- information on the industrial processes and materials (both type and quantity) used by the company, could indicate potential occupational exposures. These forms cover the following categories: Fuel Combustion Source, Semiconductor Fabrication Area, Surface Coating/Solvent Source and Organic Liquid Evaporation. Except for the Semiconductor form, all request a SIC code. There are several limitations to the information provided by this source. First, not all facilities are in compliance in possessing an emissions permit. Furthermore, the BAAQMD's priorities lie in acquiring information to compute emissions estimates primarily with regard to the criteria pollutants, oxides of sulfur and nitrogen, total suspended particulates, ozon.:, :arbon monoxide and lead. Second, while the emissions data (\vhi.:h are computed from the data forms submitted) are public record, the usage data (the actual information on the data sheets) may not be. If a facility has designated the information a trade secret, the permission of the facility must be asssured before these data can be released. The BAAQMD currently has most of its files in a computerized data bank where non-protected information is accessible by company name and by SIC. Only the semiconductor industry information is incomplete due to a reorganization of the data following the issuance of a new data form for the industry. The BAAQMD has also produced a Toxics Use Survey Report (12/85) - a survey of . 874 permitted companies in the Bay Area regarding their use (yes/no) of 50 EPA/ARB (Air Resources Board) chemicals. Of these 874 companies, 438 returned positive responses and were then asked to provide further information, including quantity purchased (1983 only), quantity incorporated into product, and informaton on incineration. The report gives estimated emissions for each of the 50 priority pollutants by company name, and lists the toxic substances used by respondents by company name and 3-digit SIC Code. County designation is included in the data. These data were not available in time for review in this report. They could be useful in identifying" potential exposures in individual firms, however, as they provide an inventory of toxic substance use, at least for the 50 criteria substances among firms requiring BAAQMD permits. Contact: Steve Hill, Bay Area Air Quality Management District, 939 Ellis Street, San Francisco, CA 94109; telephone: (415) 771-6000. REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD (RWQCB). The RWQCB issues Waste Discharge Requirements (WDR), the equivalent of a permit. for any non-sewered disposal of liquid waste. The WDR requests information on the type and quantity of wastes and where they are discharged, and on treatment equipment, in addition to company name and address. Furthermore, regular monitoring may be required of a company, with periodic reports submitted to the RWQCB and the State Department of Health Services. We were told by the principle RWQCB covering Santa Clara County (Region 2) that it issues permits only to very large companies and that it has files for about 30 to 40 companies, starting in 1967. The frequency of monitoring reports required of these companies depends on the facility. Neither the WDR nor the monitoring report information is computerized, although it is public record. We feel the usefulness of this infomiation is limited due to the few companies permitted, noncomputerization of the files. and the reported incompleteness of the data provided. California Regional Water Quality Control Board Region 2 (includes northern part of Santa Clara County), contact: 1111 Jackson St., Room 6040, Oakland, CA 94607, telephone: (415) 464-1255. California Regional Water Quality Control Board Region 3 (includes A-318 image: ------- d. Numbers are too small to develop any valid risk measures. e. Over I/10 of received illness reports are incomplete. Since reports of work-related pesticide illness are actually a small subset of Physician's First Reports on Occupational Injury or Illness, they offer less information tM" is available from the latter. (See the section in this report on the Division of Labor Statistics and Research.) However, they could be used to examine which name brands (recorded on report) are causing the most problems and to develop appropriate warning and educational schemes. U would also be possible 'o use the reports to analyze occupatiou-.eiated pesticide illness in the pest control industry within the County. For further information, contact Cliff Smith or Cindy Oshita, Department of Food and Agriculture, Worker Health and Safety Branch, Room A316, 1220 N Street, Sacramento. CA 95814; telephone (916) 445-8474. Note: The above address and telephone may also be used to request information on health effects of pesticides. 2. Pesticide Use Reports. Quarterly summaries of reports are filed with DFA from Agricultural Commissioners in all California counties. These reports give the name and address of the company, name of chemical used, number of applications, number of acres covered, and total amount of pesticide used. However, no SIC codes are included. Contact the Department of Food and Agriculture, 1220 N Street, Room A-414, Sacramento, CA 95814. 3. Pesticide Registration. Contact Pesticide Registration, 1220 N Street, Room A-I51, Sacramento, CA 95814; telephone (916) 322-5130. CALIFORNIA HEALTH FACILITIES COMMISSION (CHFO. The CHFC receives information on each patient discharged from hospitals in California. Data include diagnosis and length of stay, but omit cause of disease and occupation or industry of patient. Also, there is presently no way to detect repeat patients. If occupation and industry were included in discharge reports, along with identifiers to detect repeat patients, these data would conceivably be useful in observing hospicaijzation and disease patterns among occupations and industries. JAY ARFA AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (BAAONfDV The BAAQMD compiles some data of interest in assessing occupational health risks in Santa Clara County. In issuing permits to emission sources, the BAAQMD requires certain data forms be completed and filed with the District. Four of these forms, by providing A-317 image: ------- 7. Hnzardous Waste Information System (HWTS). This system is maintained by the Toxic Substances Control Division. Any facility transporting hazardous waste or storing it over 50 days must file a Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest, both with the state and with EPA, Sacramento maintains hard copy files on companies that completed manifests prior to 1983 and computerized files after 1983. Each file contains an EPA identification number, a manifest number, an SIC code, the kind and quantity of waste, and county where it was generated. The HWIS is public record. A list of generators of hazardous waste for a given county can be provided by the HWIS upon written request. Contact DOHS, Toxic Substances Control Division, 714 P Street, Saciamento, CA 95814. Telephone. (916) 324-1826. DATA AVAILABLE FROM CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE (DFAl 1. Pesticide Illnesses and Investigations. This computerized database is maintained by the Worker Health and Safety Unit, a bureau of the DFA Division of Pest Management, Environmental Protection, and Worker Safety. The database is developed from reports of illness investigations made by the County Agricultural Commissioner, based on physician's reports. Statistics are tabulated and published in annual reports on pesticide illness in California. The state total is broken down in the report to show the number of reports from each county. The most recent report available is the "Summary of Reports from Physicians of Illnesses That Were Possibly Related to Pesticide Exposure During the Period January 1 -December 31, 1984, in California", HS-1304, April 14, 1985. This report lists pesticide illnesses (the number of cases) in California by job and type of illness (eye, skin, eye and skin, or systemic), including hospitalization and disability days. A breakdown is made according to whether occupational or not, and according to the likelihood that the illness was in fact pesticide-related (definite, probable, possible, unlikely). There is also a detailed breakdown of illnesses by specific pesticide name. Total number of cases in each County is listed, along with the number agriculturally related. (In Santa Clara County, a total of 27 cases were reported, with 6 being agriculturally related; the state totals were 1,156 and 757, respectively.) Because the database is computerized, it is also possible to obtain special tabulations not shown in the report. This database offers very specific tabulations of illnesses, occupations, and individual pesticides. It is limited in several respects of comparing pesticides with other hazards by industry These limitations include: a. Job title recorded is not part of any standard occupational classification scheme. b. Industry classification is limited to either "agriculture" or "nonagriculture" (there is no SIC coding). c. It relies on physician's or patient's recognition of work-relatedness in order for an illness to be coded as occupational in origin. A-316 image: ------- 4. California Tumor Registry. The Registry, operated by the DOHS Resource for Cancer Epidemiology, collects and evaluates information on occurrences of cancer in San Francisco Bay Area Counties, not including Santa Clara County. The data are abstracted from medical records and death certificates. The Registry currently processes about 25,000 records, representing 13,000 cases annually. The problems with this data base are similar to those with the Birth Defects data in that occupation and indusry data are either not available on the medical records and death certificates, or they are not wholly transferred into the tumor registry files Furthermore, the Californn ^ath certifirite asks for "hst occupation", not usual occupation. The limited availability of occupational and indusuy data in both the Birth Defects and Tumor Registries stems from the fact that they were designed to determine the incidence of birth defects and cancer and not to identify occupational health hazards. A number of occupationally related cancer studies have been done based on Los Angeles cancer surveillance programs. Hypotheses may be drawn from these studies that could be applicable to similar industries in Santa Clara. An example of the use of cancer surveillance programs (and death certificates) to identify occupational disease is a study by Dr. Robert Dubrow and Dr. David H. Wegman, "Setting Priorities for Occupational Cancer Research and Control: Synthesis of the Results of Occupational Disease Surveillance Studies", Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Vol. 71, No. 6, December 1983, 11:3-1142. Information on the Tumor Registry can be obtained from California DOHS, Resource for Cancer Epidemiology, 714 P Street, Sacramento, CA 95814. Telephone: (916) 445-0932. 5. California Death Files. The Death Files are maintained by the DOHS Department of Vital Statistics and are based on death certificates, which, as already mentioned, ask for "occupation". The DOHS processes about 190,000 death records a year. Use of these files for occupational disease surveillance is limited, however, by frequently inaccurate reporting of occupation, the absence of routine coding and computerization of occupation and industry variables from the death certificates, and the non-inclusion of multiple causes of death. Contact Da%e Mitchell, DOHS, Vital Statistics, (916) 445-2684. 6- Occupational Mortality Project. The Health Data and Statistics Branch of the Rural and Community Health Division of DOHS is developing standard mortality ratios for industries and occupations. The study covers all California death certificates from 1979-1981 for decedents 16 to 64 years old. The data coded include county of residence, industry by 4-digit SIC, cause of death using ICD classification, and occupation using Department of Commerce classifications. We were told the report and a computerized tape will be available to the public by early summer, but that the occupational codes are "woefully inadequate" in describing job categories in the electronics industry in Santa Clara County. Contact Gwendolyn Doebbert, Chief of Health Demographics, at Health Data and Statistics Branch, Rural and Community Health Division, Division of Health Services, 714 P Street, Room 1476, Sacramento, CA 95814. Telephone: (916) 445-1010. A-315 image: ------- routinely available. To obtain reports or to inquire about unpublished data, contact Karen Jones or Leslie Clements (see "California Work Injuries and Illnesses" section above for address and telephone). DATA AVAILABLE FROM THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES )HS 1. General Information. Inquiries regarding the Epidemioloeical Studies Section of DOHS, including questions related to epidemiological studies and field investigations, should be addressed to California DOHS, Epidemiological Studies Section, 2151 Berkeley Way, Berkeley, CA 94704. Telephone: (415) 540-2669. Inquiries regarding the Radioloeic Health Branch, including questions about radiologic health effects and materials handling, should be addressed to California DOHS, Radiologic Health Branch, 714 P Street, Sacramento, CA 95814. Telephone: (916) 445-0931. Information on hazardous waste control can be obtained from DOHS, Toxic Substances Control Division, 714 P Street, Sacramento, CA 95814. Telephone: (916) 324-1826. 2. Health Effects of Toxic Substnnces. Health Effects of Toxic Substances is a directory of references and resources published by the Community Toxicology Unit (in the Epidemiological Studies Section of DOHS), can be obtained by writing the California Department of General Services, Publications Section, P.O. Box 1015, North Highlands, CA 95660. Pub. No. 7540-958-1300-3. 3. California Birth Defects Monitoring Program (CBDMP). This program is operated by the DOHS Epidemiological Studies Section. Starting in 1983, the CBDMP has been conducting a birth defects registry and cluster identification and investigation program. The Program covers six Bay Area counties, including Santa Clara. Presently there are 6,000 to 10,000 records processed annually, representing 3,000 to 5,000 cases. The information on the registry is abstracted from medical reports and birth and fetal death certificates which request occupation and industry. These data are of limited value however in identifying occupational causal factors as entries on occupation and industry are not routinely transfered from the birth certificates and are frequently not available from the medical records. Even when the data are available, they may be misleading; for example, the occupation listed on entry to the hospital may not be the patient's usual occupation. Also occupational titles are frequently nonspecific, as in "laborer" or "technician". For information, contact the Epidemiological Studies Section, 215; Berkeley Way, Berkely, CA 94704. Telephone: (415) 540-2669. A-314 image: ------- AVAILABLE FROM DLSR ILLNESS REPORTING SYSTEMS 1. Occupational Injuries and Illness Survey. California. The suney is published annually and is based on employer maintained logs kept to satisfy section 14301 of Title 8 of the California Administrative Code. Tables in the report include total cases of occupational illness by detailed industry, according to number of cases with lost work days and number of lost work days, rates for the same tabulations per '0^ worker*, and time trends by detailed industry for aggregated injuries and illnesses. shoeing changes acioss six >ears. Jo obtain reports, contact ivaien Jones, DLiK, P.O. Bw . 603, San Francisco, CA 94101. Telephone: (415) 557-3746. 2. California \Vork Injuries and Illnesses. This publication, also annual, is based on Employer's Reports of Occupational Injur;. and Illness (DLSR form 5020). The most recent data available are for 1984. Data in the report include disabling illnesses (i.e. resulting in one or more full days or shifts absent from time beyond the date of illness or injury) by industry; total major disabling occupational illness by source; total disabling occupational illness by type and part of bod\ affected; total disabling work illnesses by length of service with employer; total disabling work illnesses by accident type; total disabling injuries and illnesses (aggregated) by sex; total disabling occupational illness by occupation; disabling illnesses and injuries (aggregated) by county; and total fatal and nonfatal injuries and illnesses (aggregated) by year; as well as other data not specifically related to occupational illness. The database summarized by the annual report also contains numerous more detailed tables which the report does not include. In addition, various cross tabulations can be produced from the database for which prefabricated tables exist (e.g. local statistics for a given county). Such unpublished data are not routinely available to the public, but may be provided in special circumstances. To obtain reports or inquire about unpublished dat^. contact Karen Jones or Josephine Tao, P.O. Box 603, San Francisco, CA 94101. Telephone (415) 557-3746. 3. Occupational Disease in California. This report is usually published annually, though no published reports exist for 1980 or 1981. The most recent data published are for 1983. The source for this report is the Doctor's First Report of Occupational Injury or Illness. Tables include percentage distributions of occupational disease reports by county and by major industry, and various breakdowns of disease group, industry causal agent, estimated lost work time and hospitalization, county, and age and sex. Also included are total fatalities attributed to occupational disease by cause, taken from other worker's compensation data, and total pneumoconiosis deaths by cause, taken from death certificates Hied with the Department of Health Services (see the section in this report on Department of Health Services). Tabulations are contained on the database from Doctor's First Reports which are not included in the published report. As with data from the Employer's Reports, these unpublished tables, and other tabulations- not already performed by DLSR, are not A-313 image: ------- Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board • Variance Procedures Before the Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board (pamphlet) • Proposed Regulations (monthly notice of changes to Cal/OSHA regulations) Occupational Safety and Health Appeals Board • Rules of Practice and Procedure Before the Occupational Safety and Health Appeals Board (booklet) Cal/OSHA Consultation Service • Consultation for Job Safety and Health (flyer) • Employer Guide to the Material Safety Data Sheet Regulations (booklet) • Evaluation of Effective Safety and Health Programs (ninnunl) • On Site Consultation (booklet) • Small Employer Voluntary Compliance Program (flyer) • Workplace Injury and Illness Prevention Guide (booklet) special interest reprints: • Access to Employee Exposure and Medical Records Asbestos Regulations Carcinogens Regulations Confined Space Regulations Control of Noise Exposures DBCP Regulations Hazardous Substances Information and Training Law Inorganic Arsenic Regulations Lead Regulations and Appendices Material Safety Data Sheets Respiratory Protective Equipment Division of Apprenticeship Standards • APPRENTICESHIP NEWS (quarterly newsletter) • Apprenticeship in California (booklet) •pecial interest pamphlets: • Apprenticeship: A Mutual Investment • Apprenticeship Pays ; • Why Not Consider Apprenticeship (Nursing) • Your Appi titlicviltip Committee State Itfediction and Conciliation Service • Mediation/Conciliation Service: Duties, Respon- sibilities, Services (booi image: ------- DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS PUBLICATIONS Address publication requests to the specific division, board, service or office-c/o Post Office Box 603, San Francisco, California 94101. Office of the Director • California Department of Industrial Relations: What It Is and What It Does (brochure) Division of Labor Statistics and Research industrial relations research repor ts; • California Industrial Relations Reports (doi.iilixl studies of specific topics included in collective bargaining agreement*) • Provisions of Collective Bargninini< Aftrcernvnts (biennial) • Provisions of County and City negotiated Labor Agreements in California (biennial) • Union Labor in California (biennial) • Wage Settlements in California (annu.il) occupational injury and • Promptness o/ Firtl Payments. Workers' Com- pensation Benefits (scmi-anrvi.-! index' e Medical Bureau factshects: Guidelines for Mt-dic.il Examination and Report; How to Culled Medical Dills When the Insurance Company Will Not Pay; How to Get Yuur Hill Paid Self'Insurance Plans • Rules and Regulations Governing, Wurkers' Compensation Self-Insurance Plans Divioion of Occupational Safety and Health • CALIOSHANEWS (quarterly newsleitrr) • Safety and Health Protection on thejn'i (po»ter- English, Spanisli) • GuidetoCAL/OSHA (booklet) • factshects: An Outline for Planning nnd lmp!t- menting Effective Employee Training- Hu.v rv Set Up a Health and S.tfery Committee Set- ting Up a Tailgate Safety Mitt-nn,^ special interest pomp/Urts: • Electrical Safety • Farm Safety Check List (English Spii\tsli) • Guide to the Construction Industry • How to Protect Your Health jnd Safety on /lie Job. A Worker's Guide (Enpliih Sponisli) • Job-Related Cancer: Huw VouCun Help Prevent It • Lockout ID lockout Manulncturin^ Guide Occupation.^ Noise Control Order Blank for Title 8 Safety Orders Preventing Buck Injuries (English. Spanish) Respiratory Hrntvction ProŁr;im Safety and Health Films Trench and E\cavation Safety- Guitie Working Safely with Toxic Substances -A-311- image: ------- -cfll/OSHR Communication. publication/ il/t CAL/OSHA NEWS - a quarterly publication CAL/OSHA Poster - Safety 4 Health Protection on the Job x ' Semiconductor Industry Study (292-paged Technical Report - $5.00 charge) Pamphlets S-l Guide to CAL/OSHA S-6 Permits S-7 Order Blank for Title 8 Safety Orders S-9 Safety & Health Film Catalogue S-20 How to Protect Your Health & Safety on the Job A Worker's Guide (English t Spanish) S-201 Farm Safety Check List (English & Spanish) S-205 Working Safely with Pesticides (English & Spanish) S-300 Guide to the Construction Industry S-358 Trench & Excavation Safety Guide S-400 Manufacturing Guide S-502 Operating Rules for Industrial Trucks & Industrial Cow Tractors (Inglish & Spanish) S-508 Preventing Back Injuries (English & Spanish) S-515 Lockout/Blockout S-520 Circular Power Saw Safety S-550 Electrical Safety S-600 Airborne Contaminants S-607 Working Safely with Toxic Substances S-620 Resources List and Standard for Asbestos S-630 Respiratory Protection Program S-640 Job-related Cancer: How You Can Help Prevent It S-680 Occupational Noise Control Placards S-ll Access to Medical & Exposure Records (English & Spanish) S-500 Emergency Numbers! S-503 Operating Rules for Industrial Trucks (English & Spanish) S-504 Agricultural/Industrial Tractors (English & Spanish) S-507 How to Lift (English & Spanish) Tailgate Topics Tl Accident i Illness Prevention Program T2 . Multi-Pioce Rim Wheels T3 Power Pross Safety A-3'lO- image: ------- of actual carcinogen users. During 1985, the OCCU endeavored to update and verify registrations, but the success of this effort was not evaluated for this report. A list of firms which have registered carcinogen use in Santa Clara County is shown in Appendix 9 For other information on carcinogen registration, contact the Occupational Carcinogens Control Unit, Division of Occupational Safety and Health, P.O. Box 603, 3rd Floor, San FnnJsco. CA 9410: Telephone: (415) 557-2037. 4. Scheduled Health Inspections List (SHI). Vhis list is prepared from the Health Inspection Plan (hi.-'j of fedcial OSHA, a method used to select industries with the greatest potential for health problems. The current SHI list, which took effect December 1985, is based on previous years of federal OSHA health inspection experience. A ratio is calculated between the number of serious violations found and the number of inspections conducted within each industry (SIC) by federal OSHA industrial hygienists throughout the nation. Industries are then ranked from the highest to lowest ratio. The SHI list contains this ranking of SIC's; within each SIC, the number of serious violations per OSHA health inspection is listed for each standard, and individual establishment names (e.g. in California) are obtained from the Dun Marketing Services mailing list. In order to focus inspection efforts more sharply on industries where high exposures would be found, OSHA modified the HIP system by introducing an abbreviated list of 119 substances which inspections over the preceding five years had shown to be at or abo'.e 50% of the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) in at least 15% of the samples taken across all industries. This list was then used to develop Industry Weighted Indices. 5. Consultation Service. Santa Clara County requests for Consultation Service Evaluations of worksites or publications should be directed to the Emeryville office. Telephone: (415) 658-0900. 6. Standards. Pamphlets, and other CAL/OSHA Literature. Reprints of individual standards (from the California Administrative Code), as well as other educational literature are available from the CAL/OSHA Public Information Office, P.O. Box 603, San Francisco, CA 91401. Specific questions on standards can also be directed to the DOSH Research and Standards Development Unit at the same address; telephone (415) 557-2037. Copies of the CAL/OSHA publications list and the DIR publications list are shown below; the DIR list includes publications related to the Occupational Safety and Health Appeals Board, the Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board, DLSR and other DIR Divisions. A-309 image: ------- system by including additional data. The system is planned to be operational by the end of 1986 and will greatly improve access to data from CAL/OSHA inspections, including exposure monitoring levels. Contact the CAL/OSHA Program Office or the Management Information Unit, DIR, P.O. Box 603, San Francisco, CA 94101. Telephone: (415) 557-1155 (Program Office) or (415) 557-2037 (MIU). d. District Office Inspection Files The computerized files currently do not contain data on monitored exposure levels. or on hazards evaluated at a particular firm. This type of information is available for Santa Clara Coumy at the San Jose district uffice. The actual inspection files, containing inspection records, lab reports, exposure monitoring data, and information collected in the course of inspection, are kept in the District Office. Contact Milton Terry, Acting District Manager of the San Jose District Office, at 88 N. First St., San Jose, CA 95112. Telephone: (408) 277-1260. 3. Dnta from the Carcinogen Registration List. The Occupational Carcinogens Control Act of 1976 (California Health and Safety Code Sees. 24200 et seq.) requires all users of substances regulated by the state as carcinogenic to register their use with DOSH. Information on carcinogen registrants is available on microfiche. Substances currently subject to the registration requirement are as follows: Asbestos Vinyl Chloride (Chloroethene) Coke Oven Emissions l,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) Acrylonitrile 4,4'Methylene(bis) 2-chloroaniline (MOCA) Ethylene Dibromide (EDB) Ethylene Oxide (EtO) 2-Acetylaminofluorene (2-AAf) 4-Aminodiphenyl (4-ADP) Benzidine and its salts bis-Chloromethyl Ether (BCME) 3,3'Dichlorobenzidine and its salts (DCB) 4-Dimethylaminoazobenzene (Methyl Yellow) alpha-Naphthylamine (1-NA) beta-Naphthylamine (2-NA, BNA) 4-Nitrobiphenyl (4-NBP, PNB) n-nitrosodimethylamine (dmn, dmna) beta-Propiolactone (Betaprone, BPL) Methyl Chloromethyl Ether (CMME) Ethyleneimine (El, Aziridine) Inorganic Arsenic The computerized registration database contains company name, address, chemical(s) registered, number of employees affected, location in plant, number of employees total, SIC and whether the workers are represented by a local union. Prior to 1985, the state did not check registrations once they had been made, or ensure in a systematic way that new firms or users become registered. Consequently, the list contained many defunct firms and obsolete listings, while omitting ah unknown number A-308 image: ------- The State Program Quarterly Evaluation Report contains total inspections, health inspections, employees covered, serious violations, non-serious violations, penalties (total dollars) proposed for serious violations and non-serious violations, and consultation visits by 2-digit SIC code. It also contains other statewide summary data, and a log of standards variances requested, with company name and status (granted, denied, etc.). It should be noted that these reports are principally developed for state program •valuation by OSHA 3nd by state agencies and officials, and except for variance logs, contain no local data or detailed industry data. To inquire about reports, contact the CAL/OSHA Program Office, P.O. Box 603. San Francisco, CA 94101. Telephone: (415) 557-1155. b. DOSH Inspection and Cirtion Files. More particular data on local inspections, citations, and monitored exposure levels can be obtained from the DOSH computerized inspection and citation database from which the above summary reports are derived. The database includes two files: 1) CAL/OSHA Inspection File. This file is created from CAL/OSHA 1 forms. the standard forms completed by all DOSH compliance industrial hygienists and safety engineers for each inspection completed. The file includes details of the inspection type, company name, address and SIC, the number of employees affected by the inspection, the reason for the inspection (accident. complaint, etc.), the extent of the inspection, regional and county codes, and compliance status. This file does not include information on citations issued or industrial hygiene samples taken. Four-digit SICs are recorded for each company. 2) CAL-OSHA Citation File. This file includes one record for every citation issued for inspections by CAL-OSHA inspectors. Since the citations are often filed some time after completion of the inspection, there may not be perfect correspondence between this file and the CAL-OSHA inspection file for the same years. There is often more than one citation for a given inspection. Besides the identification numbers which match the citation with an inspection, this file contains the citation type, the code violated, the standard violated, and the subparagraph of that standard. The citation records must be matched with the inspection records in order to attach the citation information to an SIC, a county or a company. To inquire about data from these files, or for further information, contact the Chief of the Division of Occupational Safety and Health, Department of Industrial Relations, P.O. Box 603, San Francisco, CA 94101; telephone: (415) 557-2037. It should be noted that these computer data are a management tool. and are not routinely available to the public. c. IMIS Management Information System. Federal OSHA is funding a new computerized system to record inspection and citation data now kept in the DOSH files above. The state will augment this A-307 image: ------- DATA AVAILABLE FROM CAL/OSHA 1. Data on Toxic Substances and Henlth Effects. a. HESIS. Information on particular toxic substances and health effects, as well as proper control procedures and health monitoring, is available from HESIS, 2151 Berkeley Way, Berkeley, CA 94704; telephone (415) 540-3014. This information includes published toxicity 'jumrmries (e.g. EDB, Glycol Ethers, Methy!f»ne Chloride, and Ethylene Oxide), and the Hazard Alerts issued for EDB, Glylcol Ethers, and Ethylene Oxide, as well as searches using the HESIS library or any of the 350 computer data bases to which HESIS subscribes. All services are confidential and free of charge. b. Special Studies Reports. Data on methods of use and exposure levels for some hazards in selected industries for which special studies have been performed (e.g. etheyiene oxide in hospitals, spice plants, and medical products industries) are available from the DOSH Special Studies Unit. Other Special Studies reports include glycol ethers and EDB. In Northern California contact CAL/OSHA Special Studies Unit, 1525 Shattuck Avenue, Berkeley. Telephone: (415) 540-3037. c. MSDS Data. Information on hazardous constituents of manufactured chemical products is available from the DOSH Right to Know Unit. This information, gathered from manfacturers' material safety data sheets (MSDS's) is accessible by manufacturer's name, address (including zip code), chemical name, chemical abstact number (CAS number), and trade name of substance or product. Limitations of this source are 1) only manufacturer's, not users, must file MSDS's, 2) there are no health data on the computerized file, and 3) the state has not received MSDS's from all manufacturers, nor are all MSDS's complete (up to 90% may contain omissions). Contact the Right to Know Unit (address and telephone are the same as the Special Studies Unit). 2. Enforcement and Compliance Data. a. CAL/OSHA Program Office Summaries The Department of Industrial Relations produces quarterly summaries of compliance, consultation, and standards activities. These include the summary of compliance activity relating to the California Occupational Safety and Health Plan, and the State Program Quarterly Evaluation Report. The Summary contains information on total DOSH compliance inspections, total carcinogen-related inspections, total inspections made by compliance industrial hygienists by type (e.g. complaint) and by major industry (e.g. manufacturing), the total number of employees affected by health inspections, percentage of establishments found in compliance, total violations found (serious vs. non-serious), total penalties proposed. and total manhours expended. A-306 image: ------- This system produces four results: 1) a hazard risk index for each chemical, indicative of the relative toxicological risk of that chemical as compared to the other IOCO; 2) an adjusted hazard risk index which takes into account national population as well as toxicological risk; 3) an industry risk index which ranks SICs according to the potential risk due to chemical exposure of workers in each industry, and an occupational risk index which does the same for occupations. DATA AVAILABLE FROM EPA UNDER THE TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT (TSCA). 1. Pul-'icntions. EPA publications related to occupatonal health include the Chemical Substances Information Resources Handbook, and the TSCA Chemicals in Progress Bulletin (published bimonthly). The handbook is a chemical information resources guide to bibliographic search systems, computerized data systems, chemical lists, and relevant publications. The bulletin presents new reporting rules had rquirements, and the list of premanufacture notices (PMN's) for production of specific chemicals by chemical manufacturers. For further information write to the Industry Assistance Office, TS-799 EPA, Washington, D.D. 20460, or call (800) 424-9065. 2. The Chemical Substances Information Network. The Chemical Substances Information Network is a collection of databases containing chemical and toxicological information. For further information on gaining access to the databases, contact Dalton Tidwell, U.S. EPA, Toxicology, (301) 496-6531. 3. Chemical Data. EPA releases aggregated data on production, uses, and workers exposed for each chemical covered by TSCA. For information, call (800) 424-9065. 4. Manufacturing Data. EPA also releases information on firms or plant sites which manufacture or process a toxic chemical, except when such information is considered confidential. For information, call (800) 424-9065. A-305 image: ------- series of files which allow the user to access the data by industry (4-digit SIC), occupation (1970 census), and/or hazard (2000 substances), as well as type and duration of exposure, etc. There are a series of more than twenty different formats in which printouts of the data may be requested. This data base is not available on computer tape. There are no monitored exposure levels reflected in the database, as no environmental monitoring was performed. The development and results of the survey have been published by NIOSH in three volumes: I. NOHS Survey Manual. II. NOHS Dnta Editing and Data Base Development, and III. NOHS Survey Analysis and Supplemental Tables. Single copies are available from Publications Dissemination, Division of Technical Services, NIOSH, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, OH 45226. b. National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES) NOES was an expanded version of the NOHS procedure for certain selected industries. The survey was completed in 1984, but is not yet published. 3. The "Occupational Safety and Health (N1OSHV* File. This file of computerized data contains 106,000 records from 1973 to the present on a wide range of topics, including epidemiology, medical monitoring of workers, sampling and analytical methods, and toxicology. Access to this file on particular topics may be obtained through libraries or private parties who subscribe to the file. 4. Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances (RTECS). RTECS consists of all chemical substances with reported toxicity in the literature for any of a variety of toxicity tests. There is toxicity information on over 57,000 chemicals compiled from the literature and not critically evaluated. The data include both acute and chronic toxicity measurements; primary skin and e\e irritant data; and carcinogen, mutagen, and tumorigen data. There is one record for each type of test for each chemical. The record contains the lowest dose reported in the literature and the reference. The data may be accessed through the Chemical Information System (CIS), a national computer linkage to over ten databases supported by NIH and EPA, or on microfiche which are updated annually. Most science libraries subscribe to CIS and also receive the microfiche. 5. NOHS-RTECS Model for Identification of High Risk Industrial and Occupational Groups. This data analysis system links data from RTECS on toxicity of substances with data from NOHS on potential exposure of worker groups to those substances. There were 2092 chemical substances in the NOHS for which there were sufficient toxicity data in RTECS. The data on worker exposures to those chemicals have been compiled into 4 files according to 2, 3, or 4 digit SIC codes or 1970 census codes. The largest file has 56,206 separate exposure groups on the 4 digit SIC level. A-304 image: ------- 4. OSHA Documents. Pamphlets and other materials can be obtained from the OSHA Office of Public Affairs (see below) or from any OSHA office. The Region IX address is Box 36017, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102. Telephone: (415) 556-949" 5. Standards. OSHA standards are published in the Federal Register, and can be found under the date of adoption, or obtained from an> OSHA office or the OSHA OffL's of Public Affairs: Department of Labor, OSHA, Office of Public Affairs, Third Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Room N-3641, Washington, D.C. 20210. Telephone: (202) 523-8151. DATA AVAILABLE FROM NTOSH 1. Documents and Reports. Most Health Hazard Evaluations, Control Technology reports, Industrywide Reports. Criteria Documents, contract reports, and special reports are available from the National Technical Information Service (NTIS), 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161 Telephone: (703) 487-4780 to check for availability, (703) 487-4650 to order documents. (For a description of the various report types, see Section 2.2 on NIOSH.) A comprehensive listing of NIOSH publications is contained in the NIOSH Publications Catalog, which lists reports by type and by subject. The latest catalog is the 6th edition. published 8/84. The catalog is available from Publications Dissemination, Division of Standards Development and Technology Transfer, NIOSH, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226. Telephone: (513) 841-4287. Many NIOSH documents can also be obtained from Publications Dissemination. 2. Hazard Survevs. a. The National Occupational Hazard Survey (NOHS). The NOHS was a national data gathering effort designed to provide baseline descriptive information on potential occupational exposures. A stratified random sample of approximately 5,000 establishments in 67 metropolitan areas throughout the United States was selected by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. The sample represents all non-agricultural businesses covered under the OSH Act of 1970. The sample was deliberately biased toward establishments with a relatively high number of employees due to the costs and logistics of the survey. The survey data were gathered from 1973 to 1974. The survey consisted of two parts: an interview with the management about health and safety policies and programs and a walk-through of the establishment. During the walk-through, the occupation, number of workers, potential exposures, and an> control measures in force were recorded for each group of workers performing the same operation. Exposures were designated as half or full time. The result vos n A-303 image: ------- series of files which allow the user to access the data by industry (4-digit SIC), occupation (1970 census), and/or hazard (2000 substances), as well as type and duration of exposure, etc. There are a series of more than twenty different formats in which printouts of the data may be requested. This data base is not available on computer tape. There are no monitored exposure levels reflected in the database, as no environmental monitoring was performed. The development and results of the survey have been published by NIOSH in three volumes: I. NOHS Survey Manual. II. NOHS Data Editing and Data Bnse Development, and III. NOHS Survey Analysis and Supplemental Tables. Single copies are available from Publications Dissemination, Division of Technical Services, NIOSH, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, OH 45226. b. National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES) NOES was an expanded version of the NOHS procedure for certain selected industries. The survey was completed in 1984, but is not yet published. 3. The "Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSHV1 File. This file of computerized data contains 106,000 records from 1973 to the present on a wide range of topics, including epidemiology, medical monitoring of workers, sampling and analytical methods, and toxicology. Access to this file on particular topics may be obtained through libraries or private parties who subscribe to the file. 4. Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances (RTECS). RTECS consists of all chemical substances with reported toxicity in the literature for any of a variety of toxicity tests. There is toxicity information on over 57,000 chemicals compiled from the literature and not critically evaluated. The data include both acute and chronic toxicity measurements; primary skin and e\e irritant data; and carcinogen, mutagen, and tumorigen data. There is one record for each type of test for each chemical. The record contains the lowest dose reported in the literature and the reference. The data may be accessed through the Chemical Information System (CIS), a national computer linkage to over ten databases supported by NIH and EPA, or on microfiche which are updated annually. Most science libraries subscribe to CIS and also receive the microfiche. 5. NOHS-RTECS Model for Identification of High Risk Industrial and Occupational Groups. This data analysis system links data from RTECS on toxicity of substances with data from NOHS on potential exposure of worker groups to those substances. There were 2092 chemical substances in the NOHS for which there were sufficient toxicity data in RTECS. The data on worker exposures to those chemicals have been compiled into 4 files according to 2, 3, or 4 digit SIC codes or 1970 census codes. The largest file has 56,206 separate exposure groups on the 4 digit SIC level. A-304 image: ------- 4. OSHA Documents. Pamphlets and other materials can be obtained from the OSHA Office of Public Affairs (see below) or from any OSHA office. The Region IX address is Box 36017, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102. Telephone: (415) 556-949' 5. Standards. OSHA standards are published in the Federal Register, and can be found undci the date of adoption, or obtained from an> OSHA office or the OSHA Office of Public Affairs: Department of Labor, OSHA, Office of Public Affairs, Third Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Room N-3641, Washington, D.C. 20210. Telephone: (202) 5:3-8151. DATA AVAILABLE FROM NIOSH 1. Documents and Reports. Most Health Hazard Evaluations, Control Technology reports. Industrywide Reports. Criteria Documents, contract reports, and special reports are available from the National Technical Information Service (NTIS), 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161. Telephone: (703) 487-4780 to check for availability, (703) 487-4650 to order documents. (For a description of the various report types, see Section 2.2 on NIOSH.) A comprehensive listing of NIOSH publications is contained in the NIOSH Publications Catalog, which lists reports by type and by subject. The latest catalog is the 6th edition, published 8/84. The catalog is available from Publications Dissemination, Division of Standards Development and Technology Transfer, NIOSH, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226. Telephone: (513) 841-4287. Many NIOSH documents can also be obtained from Publications Dissemination. 2. Hazard Survevs. a. The National Occupational Hazard Survey (NOHS). The NOHS was a national data gathering effort designed to provide baseline descriptive information on potential occupational exposures. A stratified random sample of approximately 5,000 establishments in 67 metropolitan areas throughout the United States was selected by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. The sample represents all non-agricultural businesses covered under the OSH Act of 1970. The sample was deliberately biased toward establishments with n relatively high number of employees due to the costs and logistics of the survey. The survey data were gathered from 1973 to 1974. The survey consisted of two parts: an interview with the management about health and safety policies and programs and a walk-through of the establishment. During the walk-through, the occupation, number of workers, potential exposures, and an> control measures in force were recorded for each group of workers performing the same operation. Exposures were designated as half or full time. The result was a A-303 image: ------- Drug Available from OSHA OSHA maintains computerized files on a wide range of topics. The data contained in these files encompasses OSHA enforcement activities, standards interpretations, toxicology of various substances, and methods for controlling hazards. Specific files include, but are not limited to the following: 1. The OSHA Computerized Information System (OCIS). The system contains four data sets: a) the Standards Interpretation File, containing instructions clarifying OSHA standards requirements for specific hazards; b) the Hazard Abatement File, containing abstracts of control methods for specific hazards and conditions; c) the Variance File, listing those companies which have obtained specific standards variances from OSHA; and d) the Chemical Information File, summarizing industrial hygiene information related to over 400 chemicals. These files have recently been made available online at OSHA regional offices. The regional office for California (Region IX) is located at 450 Golden Gate Avenue. Box 36017, San Francisco, CA 94102; telephone: (415) 556-0586. 2. OSHA Health Inspection Plan fHIPV This database analyzes industries based on the hazardous materials they use and the toxicity of these materials. Reports available from this database contain rankings of over 600 types of business enterprises according to degree of overall hazardousness, as determined through a ranking system known as the OSHA Weighted Index (OWI). Also available are reports which list, for each of the 600 types of business, the chemicals which contributed to the ranking for up to the 80 most important chemicals. To focus inspection efforts more sharply on industries where high exposures are found, OSHA has modified the HIP system by introducing an abbreviated list of 129 substances from OSHA inspections over the preceding five years with sampled exposures at or above 50% of the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) in at least 15% of the samples taken across all industries. This list was then used instead of the National Occupational Health Survey (NOHS) substance list in developing Weighted Industry Indices. Reports can be obtained through the OSHA Office of Compliance Programming, Washington, D.C., 20210. 3. OSHA Integrated Management Information Svstem (IMIS^. This file contains data on OSHA inspections and citations, including results of exposure monitoring during inspections. Most inspections in the system were initiated by complaints, though the system also contains data from OSHA target inspection programs (e.g. for foundries). Virtually all complaint-based OSHA inspections are performed in states without their own state programs. Contact the OSHA Office of Policy, Legislation. and Interagency Programs, Washington, D.C., Telephone: (202) 523-8021. A-302 image: ------- California Department of Health Services (DOHS) I. General Information 2. Health Effects of Toxic Substances 3. California Birth Defects Monitoring Program 4. California Tumor Registry 5. California Death Files 6. Occupational Mortality Project 7 Hazardous Waste Information System California Department of Food and Agriculture (DFA) 1. Pesticide Illnesses and Investigations 2. Pesticide Use Reports California Health Facilities Commission (CHFC) BJV Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Local Agencies and Organizations 1. Santa Clara County Agricultural Commissioner's Office 2. Santa Clara Center for Occupational Safety and Health (SCCOSH) 3. Local Sanitary Districts and Agencies 4. Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinances A-301 image: ------- APPENDIX 10 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH RESOURCES AND DATA SYSTEMS: A DIRECTORY This Directory describes data systems and information resources available from agencies discussed in Section 2, and lists agency telephone numbers and addresses. The Directory contains entries for these agencies and data sources: OSHA 1. The OSHA Computerized Information System (OCIS) 2. OSHA Health Inspection Plan (HIP) 3. OSHA Integrated Management Information System (IMIS) 4. OSHA Documents 5. Standards NIOSH 1. Documents and Reports 2. Hazard Surveys 3. Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) File 4. RTECS 5. NOHS-RTECS model for Identification of High Risk Industrial and Occupational Groups. ŁŁA 1. Publications 2. Chemical Substances Information Network 3. Chemical Data 4. Manufacturing Data CAL/OSHA 1. Toxic Substances and Health Effects Data 2. Enforcement and Compliance Data 3. Scheduled Health Inspection List (SHI) 4. Carcinogen Registration List 5. Consultation Service 6. Standards, Pamphlets, and other CAL/OSHA Literature California Division of Labor Statistics and Research (DLSR) 1. Occupational Injuries and Illness Survey, California 2. California Work Injuries and Illnesses 3. Occupational Disease in California A-300 image: ------- APPENDIX 11 A Key to Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Codes This Appendix gives standardized short titles for all SIC codes in the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, j.972, U.S. Office of Management and Budget. "NEC" denotes "not elsewhere classified". LIST OF SHORT SIC TITLES A. AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY, AND FISHING 01 Oil 0111 0112 011S 011S 0119 013 0131 0132 0133 0131 0139 016 0161 01? 0171 0172 0173 0174 017S 0179 01S 0181 01 S3 0189 019 0191 0: 02! 0211 0212 0213 0214 0219 024 0211 025 0251 0211 01T.3 OiiJ 02^9 027 0271 Ihtrt Tllll AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION- CHOPS Cash Grain* Wbeat Rln Corn Soybean* CuMb grain*. nee Field Crop*, Eicept Cuh Grain* Cotton Tobacco Sugar crops I rub potato** Field crop*, except nib grain*. nee Vegetable* and Melon* Vendible* and melon* Fruit* and Tree Nut* Merry crops Orape* Tree nut* Citrus frulU Deciduous tree fruit* Fruit* and tre*nuu,nec Horticultural Specialtiea Ornamental nursery product* Food crop* grown under cover Horticultural wpcclaltlei, nee General Parma, Primarily Crop General farms, primarily crop AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION- LIVESTOCK Liventorl'. t\e. Dairy, Poultry, etc. De«f cattle feed lots Dccf cattle, except feed lot* Dogi Sbecp and goat* General livestock, nee Dairy Farma Dairy fnrm* Poultry and Egg* DroiiiT. fryer, und roaster chickens ChkUcn egg* Turlii'jrs ami turkey egg s Poultry liatclitrlcs Poultry And i-tfk's. nee Aninul Specialties >'ur bviirliii; unliual* and rabbits 0272 0279 029 0291 07 071 0711 072 0721 0722 0723 0724 0729 074 0741 0742 07S 07S1 0752 076 0761 0762 078 0781 0782 078." 08 031 OS11 032 0321 Oil 1)313 03)9 03i OS51 09 (Wl 0'.M2 0'.H3 0:M9 0'J2 0021 U'jT U'Jll Ikirl Bones and other equloea Animal *i».-clulile«, oec General Farm*, Primarily LIv«atock General farms, primarily llTcttock AGRICULTURAL SERVICES Soil Preparation Service* Soil preparation Mrrlcei Crop Service* Crop planting and protection Crop liarvc»tlog Crop preparation lervtce* for market Cottoa ginning General crop «ervices Veterinary Servicea Veterinary tcrriccs, farm llveitoek Veterinary icrvicci, ipeelalUt* Animal Servicea, Except Veterinary Livestock icrvicei, exc. tpeelaltle* Animal ipcclalty acrrlces Farm Labor and Management Service* Kurm labor contractor* Fnrm management lervlces L*ndtc*pe and Horticultural Service* Lflodscnpe counseling and planning Lnnrn and garden service* Ornamental sbrub and tree *ervlce* FORESTRY Timber Tract* ^Timber tract* Forest Nurierie* and Se*d Catherine Forest nurseries and cecd gatberlfig Gathering of Misc. Forest Pro-duett Extraction of plue gum Catbcrlog of forest product*, we Forestry Services Forestry services FISHING. HUNTING, AND TRAPPING Commercial Fishing Misi-diiineous marine product* Fiili ll«tflii-riti snd Pre*erve* Kivli linu-licrlcs flml prcicrrcs HiHilmi;. Trsjipinv:, Came Propagation lliiulln^. iru|.|ilnk-. fnutv A-322 image: ------- STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION B. MINING Cod* Bllort Tillt 10 METAL MINING 101 Iron Orel 1011 Iron ore* 102 Copper Ore* 1021 Copper ores 103 Lead and Zinc Ore* 1031 .Lead tod zinc ore* 104 Gold and Silver Ore* 1041 Gold ore* 1044 Silver ore* IDS B«axite and Other Aluminum Ores 1051 Banxit* and other aluminum ores 106 Ferroalloy Ores, Except Vanadium 1061 Ferroalloy orei, except vanadium 108 Metal Mininf Service* 1081 Metal mining wrrlcet 109 Miscellaneous Metal Ore* 1092 Mercury ore* 1094 .Uranium-radlum-vanadlTim orei 1099 Metal ore*, nee 11 ANTHRACITE MINING 111 Anthracite Mining 1111 Anthracite 1112 Anthracite mining service* u BITUMINOUS COAL AND LIGNITE MINING 121 Biturainooi Coal and Lignite. Mining 1211 Bltumlnou* coal and lignite 1213 Bltumlnou* 4 lignite mining service* 13 OIL AND GAS EXTRACTION 131 Crude Petroleum and Natural Gaa 1311 Crude petroleum and natural ga* 132 Natural Gaa Liquida Catf* U 1S2 1521 1522 153 1531 154 1541 1542 Cod* 1321 138 1381 1382 1389 14 gkort TUtt Natural tni liquid* Oil and Gis F' MiscelUneou* Nonmetallie Mineral* 1492 Gypsum 1496 Talc, voapstone, and pyrophylUte 1499 Nonmetalllc mineral*, nee C. CONSTRUCTION a\»n Tint GENERAL BUILDING CONTRACTORS Residential Building Construction Single-family housing construction Residential construction, nee Operative Builders Operative nullilera Nonreaidential Building Construction Industrial l»ill image: ------- LIST OK SHOUT SIC TITLES Cmlc Sktn Title 17 SPECIAL TRADE CONTRACTORS 171 Plumbing, Heating. Air Conditioning 1711 riiiinliliiK. IK-HI Inc. nlr conditioning 172 Painting. Paper Hanging, Decorating 1721 I'ulntliiK. i«M*r bangine, decorutiug 173 Electrical Work 1731 Klectricnl work 174 Maaonry, Stonework, and Plaalering 1741 Mnvoiiry and other stonework 1742 nattering, drywall and Insulation 1743 Tcrrazzo, tile, marble, mosaic work 17S Carpentering and Flooring 1751 Carpentering I't'le Iktrt Title 1752 Floor laying anil di>or work, nee 176 Roofing and Shttt Metal Work 1761 Idivliiit; mill sbi-vl luvinl work 177 Concrete Work 1771 CoiuTfU- work 178 Water Well Drilling 1781 \VJIIT wvli drilling 179 MUe. Special Trade Contractor* 1791 Strncturnl »teel erection 1793 Uluva anil glazing work 1794 Excnvnting and foundation work 1795 Wrecking nnd demolition work 179C Installing balldioe equipment. Bee 1799 Special trnJe coo tractor*, nee D. MANUFACTURING Cult lltort Till! 20 FOOD AND KINDRED PRODUCTS 201 Meat Producta 2011 ileut nncklnc plant* 2013 Snusoge* anil other prepared meata 2016 Poultry dresaing planta 2017 Poultry and egg processing 202 Dairy Products 2021 Crenmery butter 2022 Cheese, natural and processed 2023 Condensed and evairaratcd milk 2024 lev cream and frozen desserts 2026 Fluid milk 203 Preserved Fruits and Vegetables 2032 Canned specialties 2033 Canned fruits and rentable* 2034 Dehydrated fruiu, vegetables, soups 2035 I'lcklev, Nnuce*, and wiluil ilreiwInB* 2037 Krosen^rult* and vegetable* 2038 Frozen i|*ciulties 204 Grain Mill Producta 2041 Flour and oilier grain mill product* 2043 Cereal breakfast foods 2044 Rice milling 2045 DlendcO and pretnred dour 2046 Wet corn milling 2047 Dog, cat, and other i«t food 2048 l'r?|iartd feeds, nee 205 Bakery Product* 2051 Dreud, cuke, and related products 2052 Cookies and crackers 206 Sugar and Confectionery Producta 2061 HAW nine incur 2062 Cane nugar refining 2063 2065 2066 2067 207 2074 2075 2076 2077 2079 208 2082 2083 2084 2085 2086 2087 209 2091 2092 2095 2097 2098 2099 21 211 2111 212 2121 213 2131 214 2141 tktrt rule Deet nuear Confectionery product* Chocolate and cocoa products Chetvlnc cum Fata and Oils fottonMwil oil mills Moyi*un oil mills \>eetaljlr °il Dill*, nee Animal nnd marine fat* and oils aiiarti'iiliig and cooking oils Beverages Malt beverages Malt Wine*, brandy, and brandy spirits OtmllliMl liquor, rzcvpt brandy llottkil uiiil canned soft drink* Flavoring i-xtract* and sirup*, nee Miac. Food* and Kindred Producta Canned and cured seafood* Fresb or frozen packaged fl*n Roasted coffee Munufiictured Ice Mncuronl and iiughettl Food prc|*rutlou», nee TOBACCO MANUFACTURES Cigarette* Cigara Clenn« Chrwing and Smoking Tobacco Clirwlnc nnd iniuklng tobuccu Tobacco Stemming and Kedrying Tobacco *teuiuiue and rtilrying A-324 image: ------- STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION Ceil «»«rr rill* 22 TEXTILE MILL PRODUCTS 22} Waiving Mills, Cotton 2211 Wearing mills, cotton 222 Wearing Mill*, Synthetic* 2221 Wearing mills, synthetics 223 Wearing ind Finishing Mills, Wool 2231 Wetvmg and finishing mills, wool 224 Narrow Fabric Milli 2241 Niu-row fabric mill* 225 Knitting mill* 2251 Women's hosiery, except sock* 2252 Hosiery, nee 2253 Knit outerwear mills 2254 Knit underwear mills 2257 Circular knit fabric mills 2258 Warp knit fabric mills 2259 Knitting mlllj, nee 226 Teitile Finishing. Except Wool 2261 Finishing plants, cottou 2262 Finishing plsnts, synthetics 2269 Finishing plants, nee 227 Floor CoTtring Mills 2271 WoTen carpets and rugs 2272 Tufted can*ts snd rugs 2279 Carpets and ruga, nee 228 Yarn and Thread Mills 2281 Tarn mills, except wool 2282 Throwing and winding mills 2283 Wool yarn mills 2284 Thread mills 229 Miscellaneous Textile Goods 2291 Felt goods, exc. woven felts & bats 2292 Lace goods 2293 Paddings and upholstery filling 2294 Processed textile waste 2295 Coated fabrics, not rubberised 2296 Tire cord snd fabric 2297 Nonworen fabric* 2298 Cordage and twine 2299 Textile goods, nee 23 APPAREL AND OTHER TEXTILE PRODUCTS 231 Men's and Boys' Suits and Coats 2311 Men's snd DOTH' suits and coats 232 Men's and Boys' Furnishings 2321 Men's snd boys' shirts and nlgbtwear 2322 Men's and boys' underwear 2323 Men's and boya' neckwear 2327 Men's and boys' separate trousers 2328 Men's snd boys' work clothing 2329 Men's and boys' clothing, nee Ctdf •»«!•« TUli 233 Women's snd Misses' Outerwear 2331 Women's & misses' blouses 4 waists 2335 Women's and nilsucs' dresses 2337 Women's and misses' suits and coats 2339 Women's snd misses' outerwear, nee 234 Women's snd Children's Undergarments 2341 Woiuen'« uuU i'iiU.'va 4 ..uderwear 2342 Brunsleres and silled garments 235 Hats, Caps, and Millinery 351 Millinery 2352 Hutu and caps, except millinery 236 Children's Outerwear 2361 Children's dresses and blouses 2363 Children'* coats snd suits 2369 Children's outerwear, nee 237 Fur Good* 2371 Fur goods 238 Miscellaneous Apparel and Accessories 2381 Fabric drew and work glOTcs 2384 Robes snd dressing gowns 2385 Waterproof outergarments 2386 Leather and sbeep lined clothing 2387 Apparel belts 2389 Appa-rel and accessories, nee 239 Misc. Fabricated Textile Products 2391 Curtains and draperies 2392 House furnishings, nee 2393 Textile bigs 2394 Canvas and related product! 2395 Pleating and stitching 2396 Automotlre and apparel trimming* 2397 Schlffli machine embroideries 2399 Fabricated textile products, nee 24 LUMBER AND WOOD PRODUCTS 241 Logging Camps ft Logging Contractors 2411 Logging camps * logging contractors 242 Sawmills and Planing Mill* 2421 Sawmills and planing mills, general 2426 Hardwood dimension and flooring 2429 Special product sawmills, nee 243 Millwork, Plywood * Structnral Mem- ber* 2431 Millwork 2434 Wood kitchen cabinet* 2435 Hardwood veneer and plywood 2436 Softwood veneer and plywood 2439 Structural wood members, nee 244 Wood Container* 2441 Nailed wood Uoxes snd shook 2448 Wood imllets and skid* 2449 Wood containers, nee A-325 image: ------- LIST OF SHORT SIC TITLES Ctlt 245 Wood Buildings and Mobile Hornet 2451 Mobile liuuien 2452 1'rcfttbricated wood buildings 249 Miscellaneous Wood Product! 2491 Wood preserving 2492 Pnrtlcleboard 2499 Wood product*, nee 25 FURNITURE AND FIXTURES 251 Household Furniture 2511 Wood household furniture 2512 Upholstered household furniture 2514 Metal household furniture 2515 Mattresses sod bedsprlnc* 2517 Wood TV snd rmdlo ctbineu 2519 Household furniture, nee 252 Office Furniture 2521 Wood office furniture 2522 MvU4 office furniture 253 Public Buildinc * Related Fomltore 2531 Public building 4 related furniture 254 Psrtitions and Fixtures 2541 Wood ittrtUloiu sod fixture* 2542 Metal imnitioos sod fixtures 259 Miscellsneous Furniture and Fixtures 2591 Draiwry hardware 4 blinds 4 shades 2599 furniture snd fixtures, nee 28 PAPER AND ALLIED PRODUCTS 261 Pulp Mills 2(11 Pulp mills 262 Paper Mills, Except Buildinc Paper 2621 Pu|«r mills, except building p«per 263 Psperboard Mills 2631 Paiwrbourd mills 264 Misc. Converted Psper Products 2641 Psper eoatinf and glailog 2642 Envelopes 2643 Bap, except textile ban 2645 Die-cut paper and board 2646 Pressed and molded pulp Roods 2647 Sanitary paper products 2648 StMtlooery products 2649 Converted paper products, nee 265 Paperboard Containers and Boxes 2651 Folding paperboard boxes 2652 S*l-up |iur«rbourd boxes 2653 Corrugated and solid fiber boxes 2654 Sanitary focx! container* 2655 Fiber Minx, drums 4 sluillor products 266 Building Psper snd Bosrd Mills 2661 Building puiwr und board mills Cut* flkcrf Tun V PRINTING AND PUBLISHING 271 Newspapers 2711 NewMpuivrs 272 Periodicals 2721 Periodicals 273 Books 2731 Book publishing 2732 Book printing 274 Miscellaneous Publishing 2741 Miscellaneous publUUlng 275 Commercial Printing 2751 Commercial printing, letterpress 2752 Commercial printing, lithographic 2753 EogravJnc and plate printing 2754 Commercial printing, grsrure 276 Manifold Business Forma 2761 Manifold business forms 277 Greetinx Card Publishing 2771 Greeting curd publishing 278 Blankbooks and Bookbinding 2782 Blankbooks and loowlnf binders 2789 Bookbinding snd related work 279 Printing Trade Services 2791 Typesetting 2793 PhotoenicruvlDC 2794 Electrotypiug and stcreotyplog 2795 LltliognpLic platemaklog services 28 CHEMICALS AND ALLIED PROD- UCTS 281 Industrial Inorganic Chemicals 2812 Alkalies sod chlorine 2813 Industrial gases 2816 loorgaolc pigments 2819 Industrial laorgsolc chemicals, nee 282 Plastics Materials and Synthetics U21 Plsstlcs materials and resins 2822 Synthetic rubber 2823 Ollulotlc msn-made fibers 2824 Organic fibers, ooncellnloslc 283 Drugs 2831 Biological products 2833 Medlcloals sod botanicals 2834 Pharmaceutical preparations 284 Soap, Cleaners, snd Toilet Goods 2841 Sosp snd other detergents 2842 Polishes snd sriMiaiiou goods 2843 Surface active agents 2844 Toilet preparations 2A5 Paints and Allied Products 2851 Paints and allied products 286 Industrial Orgsnic Chemicals A-326 image: ------- STANDAHD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION Cade iAorf Title 2861 Gum and wood chemical* 2845 Cyi'lif crmlt". uml IntiTiiicdintes 21169 Industrial organic clifuiicalit. nee 287 Agricultural ChcmiciU 2873 Nitrogenous fertilizers 2874 Phospliatic fertilizers 2873 FertiliziTi, njiiiuc only 2879 Agricultural chemicals, nee 289 Miscellaneous Chemical Products 2891 Aducsives aod sealants 2892 Explosive* 2893 Printing Ink 2895 Carbon black .2899 Chemical prepara. 3ns, nee 29 PETROLEUM AND COAL PRODUCTS 291 Pttroleura Refining 2911 Petroleum refining 295 Paving and Roofing Material! 2951 Paving mixtures aod blocks 2952 Asphalt fells aod coatings 299 Misc. Petroleum and Coal Products 2992 Lubricating oils and greaaes 2999 Petroleum and coal products, nee 30 RUBBER AND MISC PLASTICS PRODUCTS 301 Tires and Inner Tube* 3011 Tires and loner tubes 302 Rubber and Plastics Footwear 3021 Rubber and plastics footwear 303 Reclaimed Rubber 3031 Reclaimed rubber 304 Rubber and Plastic* How and Belting 3041 Rubber aod plastics hose aod belting 306 Fabricated Rubber Products, nee 3069 Fabricated rubber products, nee 307 Miscellaneous Plaatics Products 3079 Miscellaneous plastic* products 31 LEATHER AND LEATHER PRODUCTS 311 Leather Tanning and Finishing 3111 Leather tanning and finishing 313 Boot and Shot Cut Stock and Findings 3131 Boot and shoe cut stock aod flndlogs 314 Footwear, Except Rubber 3142 House slippers 3143 Men's footwear, except athletic 3144 Women's footwear, except athletic 3149 Footwear, except rubber, nee 315 Leather Gloves and Mittens 3151 Leather gloves and mittens Coil* 316 3161 317 3171 3172 319 3199 32 321 3211 322 3221 3229 323 3231 324 3241 325 3251 3253 3255 3259 326 3261 3262 3263 3264 3269 327 3271 3272 3273 3274 3275 328 3281 329 3291 3292 3293 3295 3296 3297 3299 Short Title Luggage Handbags and Personal Leather Goods Women'* liniidungs und purses Personal loailier goods, ncc Leather Goods, nee Leather goods, oec STONE, CLAY, AND GLASS PROD- UCTS Flat Glass Flat glaas Glass snd Glassware, Pressed or Blown Gloss containers Pressed aod blown glass, oec Products of Purchased Glass Products of purchased glass Cement, Hydraulic Cement, hydraulic Structural Clay Products Brick aod structural clay tile CVramic wall aod floor tile Clay refractories Structural clay products, nee Pottery snd Related Products Vitreous plumbing fixtures Vitreous china food utensils Floe earthenware food utensils Porcelain electrical supplies Pottery products, nee Concrete, Gypsum, snd Plaster Products Concrete block aod brick Concrete products, oec Ready-mixed concrete Lime Gypsum products Cut Stons and Stone Products Cut stone and stone products Misc. Nonmetallie Mineral Products Abrasive product* Asbestos products Gnskcts, packing and sealing devices Minerals, ground or treated Mineral wool Nonclny refractories Noninetnlllc mineral products, nee 33 PRIMARY METAL INDUSTRIES 331 Blast Furnace and Basic Steel Products 3312 nijst furnnccv and steel mills 3313 Eli-ctrometnllurgical products 1315 Steel wire and related product* A-321 image: ------- LIST OF SHORT SIC TITLES Cude Hkort Tide 3316 ColU finishing of »t««l shapes 3317 Steel pl|* and tubes 332 Iron tod Steel Foundries 3321 Gray Iron foundries 3322 Malleable Iron foundries 3324 Steel Investment foundries 3325 Steel foundries, nee 333 Primary Non/errous MeUU 3331 Primary copper 3332 Primary lead 3333 Primary zinc 3334 Primary aluminum 3339 Primary nonferrour metals, nee 334 Secondary Nonferroua Metals 3341 Secondary uonferrouv metals 333 Nonferroui Roll in r and Drawing 3351 Copper rolling and drawlnc 3353 Aluminum sheet, plate, and foil 3354 Aluminum extruded products 3355 Aluminum rollloc and drawing, nee 3356 N'onf«rrou» rolling and drawing, nee 3357 Nonferroui wire drawing 4 Insulating 336 Nonferroua Foundries 3361 Aluminum foundries 3362 Brass, bronze, and copper foundries 3369 Nonferrous foundries, nee 339 Miscellaneous Primary Metal Products 3398 Metal h«at treating 3399 Primary metal products, nee 34 FABRICATED METAL PRODUCTS 341 Metal Cans and Shipping Containers 3411 Metal cans 3412 Metal barrels, dniton, and palls 342 Cutlery. Hand Tools, and Hardware 3421 Cutlery 3423 Hand and edge tools, nee 3425 Hand saws and saw blades 3429 Hardware, nee 343 Plumbing and Heating. Except Electric 3431 Mrtnl (unitary ware 3432 Pluinblnc fittings and brass goods 3433 Heating equipment, except electric 344 Fabricated Structural Metal Product* 3441 F.ibrU-ntnl vtructurnl metal 3442 Mi-tnl door*. sflRli, and trim 3443 Fubrlcutetl plate work (boiler abops) 3444 Slu-el metal work 3416 Architectural metnl work 3448 PrefiibrlcnteO metal bnlldlngs 3449 Miscellaneous metal work Cuil* Hhorl Tltlt 345 Screw Machine Product*, BolU, tie. 3451 Screw maclnne products 3452 Dolts, nuts, rivets, and waibers 346 Metal Forgings and Stampings 3462 Iron and steel forcings 3463 Nonfcrrous forglngs 3465 Automotive stamping* 3466 Crowns and closures 3169 Metal ' i'9i'.<:;i. n«c 347 Metal Services, nee 3471 Plating and polishing 3473 Metal costing and allied services 348 Ordnance and Accessories, nee 3482 Small srmi ammunition 3483 Ammunition, exc. for small arms, nee 3484 SmslI arms 3489 Ordnsoee and accessories, nee 349 Misc. Fabricated Met*! Products 3493 Steel springs, except wire 3494 Valres and pipe flttlngt 3495 Wire spring* 3496 Misc. fabricated wire products 3497 Metal foil and leaf 3498 Fabricated i>!|>e and fittings 3499 Fabricated metal products, nee 35 MACHINERY. EXCEPT ELECTRICAL 351 Engines and Turbines 3511 Turbines and turbine generator sets 3519 Internal combustion engines, nee 352 Farm and Garden Machinery 3523 Form machinery and equipment 3524 Lawn snd garden equipment 353 Construction and Related Machinery 3531 Construction machinery 3532 Mining macblnery 3533 Oil field machinery 3534 Elevators and moving stairways 3535 Conveyors and conveying equipment 3536 Hoists, crones, snd monorails 3537 Industrial trucks and tractors 354 Mctalworking Machinery 3541 MiirUuu» tooU. metal cutting types 3542 Machine tool*, metal forming types 3544 Siwclol ilies. tools, jig* 4 fixtures 3545 Machine tool accessories 3546 Powrr driven band tools 3547 Rolling mil! machinery 3549 Mvt.ilworklne machinery, nee 355 Special Industry Machinery 3551 Food product* macbiuery A-326 image: ------- STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION Otdt f»on 3552 Textile machinery 3553 Woodworking machinery 3554 Psi*r industries machinery 3555 Printing trades machinery 3559 Special Industry machinery, nee 356 General Industrial Machinery 3561 Pumps nnrt piimplpjeoviiiTient 1562 Ba ll a nd roller bea rings 3563 Air and gas compressors 3564 Blower* and fana 3565 Industrial patterna 3566 Speed changers, drlrea, and gear* 3567 Industrial furnaces and ovens 3568 Power tn isuilislon equipment, nee 3569 General Industrial machinery, uec 357 Office and Computing Machine* 3572 Typewrite™ 3573 Electronic computing equipment 3574 Calculating and accounting machines 3576 Scales and balances, ezc. laboratory 3579 Office machines, nee 358 Refrigeration and Scrrice Machinery 3581 Automatic merchandising machines 3582 Commercial laundry equipment 3585 Refrigeration and heating equipment 3586 Measuring and dispensing pumps 3589 Serrlce Industry machinery, nee 359 Mis*. Machinery. Except Electrical 3392 Carburetors, pistons, rings, valves 3599 Machinery, except electrical, nee 36 ELECTRIC AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT MI Electric Distributing Equipment 3612 Transformers 3613 Swltcbgear and switchboard apparatus 362 Electrical Industrial Apparatus 3621 Motors and generator* 3622 Industrial controls 3623 Welding apparatus, electric 3624 Carbon and graphite products 3629 Electrical industrial apparatus, nee 363 Household Appliancea 3631 Household cooking equipment 3632 Household refrigerators and freesera 3633 Household laundry equipment 3634 Electric house-wares and fans 3635 Houaehold vacuum cleanem 3636 Sewing machines 3639 Household appliances, nee Corf. Iktrl TUU 364 Electric Lighting and Wiring Equipment 3641 Elevtrlc lamps 3643 Curreut-carrytng wiring dCTlces 3644 Nonciirrentarts and accessories 3715 Truck trailers S72 Aircraft and Parts 3721 Aircraft 3724 Aircraft engines and engine parts 3728 Aircraft equipment, nee 373 Ship and Boat Building and Repairing 3731 Ship building and retiring 3732 Bout luiildlni; and repairing 374 Railroad Equipment 3743 Railroad equipment 375 Motorcycle*. Bicycle*, and Parts 3751 Motorcycles, bicycles, and part* 376 Guided Missiles. Space Vehicles, Psrts 3761 Guided missiles and space vehicle* A-329 image: ------- LIST OF SHORT SIC TITLES Cerft Iftert TUlt 3764 Space proiiuUlon units end i«rt» 3769 Space vvlik-lr w)iil|>au-iil, nee 379 Miscellaneous Transportation Equip- ment 3792 Travel trailer* and caa|*r* 3795 Tunkj toil Unk components 3799 Transportation equipment, ntc. 31 INSTRUMENTS AND RELATED PRODUCTS Ul Engineering A Scientific Initrumtnti 3811 Engineering A scientific Instruments 382 Measuring and Controlling Device* 3822 Environmental control* 3823 Proces* control Instrument* 3824 Fluid meters snd count In e device* 382S Instrument! to messure electricity 3829 Measuring A cootrolllnc devices, oec 383 Opticsl Instruments and Lenses 3832 Opticsl Instruments and lenses 384 MediesJ Instruments and Supplies 3841 Surgical sod medical Instruments 3842 Surgical appllsnces and supplies 3843 Dental equipment and supplies 385 Ophthalmic Goods 3851 Ophthalmic foods 386 Photographic Equipment and Supplies 3861 Photographic equipment anil supplies 387 Wstches, Clocks, and Wsteheases 3873 Watches, clocks, and watchcases C»«« tk«rt fill* 39 MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTHIES 391 Jewelry. Silverware, sad PlaUd War* 3911 Jewelry, precious metal 3914 Silverware and plated ware 3915 Jewt-len' materials & lapidary work 393 Mu*ic»l Instruments 3931 Musical Instruments 394 Toys sad Sportinf Goods 3942 Dolls 3944 Games, toys, and children's vehicle* 3949 Sporting snU athletic foods, nee 395 Pens, Pencils. Office and Art Supplies 3951 Pens snd mecbsnlcal pencils 3952 Lesd pencils snd an foods 3953 Xlsrklnf devices 3955 Carbon paper and Inked ribbons 396 Costume Jewelry and Notions S96I Costume jewelry J962 Artificial flowers 3963 Buttons 3964 Needles, pins, snd fasteners 399 Miscellaneous Msnufacturss 3991 Broom* and brushes 3993 Slcas snd sdvertlslnf displays 3995 Burlsl caskets 3996 Bird surface floor coverinn 3999 Manufactures Industries, nee E. TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC UTILITIES C*tf( f»»r» THIl 40 RAILROAD TRANSPORTATION 401 Railroads 4011 Railroads, line-haul operatlnf 4013 Swltchlnf and terminal services 404 Railway Express Service 4041 Railway express *ervU« 41 LOCAL AND INTERURBAN PAS- SENGER TRANSIT 411 Local and Suburban Transportation 4111 Local and suburban transit 4119 Local passenger transportation, nee 412 Tszicabs 4121 To lien Us 413 Intercity Hifhwsy Transportation 4131 Intercity hlcliwsy transportation 414 Transportation Charter Service 4141 Local jiaascncer chnrter si-rrlce 4142 Charter service, except local *»»n rui* 415 School Buses 4151 School buses 417 Bus Terminal snd Service Facilities 4171 Bus terminal facilities 4172 Bus service facilities 42 TRUCKING AND WAREHOUSING 421 Trucking. Local and Lone DisUnce 4212 Local trucking, without storsfe 4213 Trucklnc, except local 4214 Loco I trucking and storage 422 Public Warrhouainf 4221 Kami product wnrebouslnf snd storage 4222 RpfrigiTaied wareLouiinj 4224 lloutoliold foods warebouslnf 4225 Genprnl wnroliomltig and storsfv 4226 SixK-inl warelioimne and stormf*. Dec 423 Trucking Terminal Facilities 4231 Truckmf terminal facilities - A- 3 3 0 image: ------- STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION Cod« Skort Title 43 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE 431 U.S. PosUl Service 4311 U.S. Postal Serricc 44 WATER TRANSPORTATION 441 Deep Sea Foreign Transportation 4411 Deep sea foreign tranuportation 442 Deep Sea Domestic Transportation 4421 Noncontiguous area transportation 4422 Coastwise transportation 4423 Intercoastal transportation 443 Grtat Lake* Traniporution 4431 Great Lakes transportation 444 Transportation on Hirers and Caoala 4441 Transportation on riven and canal* 44S Local Water Transportation 4452 Ferries 4453 Lighterage 4454 Totting and tugboat service 4459 I-oca I water transportation, nee 446 Water Transportation Services 4463 Marine cargo handling 4464 Canal operation 4469 Water transportation services, nee 45 TRANSPORTATION BY AIR 451 Certificated Air Transportation 4511 Certificated air transportation 452 Noncertificated Air Transportation 4521 Noncertlflcflted air trnnsi>ortatioii 458 Air Tranaportation Services 4582 Airports and flying fields 4583 Airport terminal services 46 PIPE LINES. EXCEPT NATURAL GAS 461 Pipe Lines. Except Natural Gaa 4612 Crude petroleum pipe lines 4613 Refined petroleum pip* lines 4619 Pipe lines, nee 47 TRANSPORTATION SERVICES 471 Freight Forwarding 4712 Freight forwarding 472 Arrangement of Tranaportation Coil* Short Tiff* 4722 Passenger transportation arrangement 4723 Freleht transportation arrangement 474 Rental of Railroad Can 4742 Railroad car rental with service 4743 Ruilro.t image: ------- LIST OF SHORT SIC TITLES F. WHOLESALE TRADE I'eif* *A«n rill* 50 WHOLESALE TRADE—DURABLE COUDS SOI Motor Vehicles & Automotive Equipment 5012 Automobile* and ollirr motor vehicles 5013 Automotive jiorta a Del luppllcs 5014 Tires and tubes 502 Furniture and Home Furnishings 5021 Furniture 5023 Home furnishings 503 Lumber snd Construction Materials 5031 Lumber, plywood sod mlllwork 5039 Construction materials, nee 504 Sporting Goods, Tors, and Hobby Goods 5041 Sportlns and recreational goody 5042 Toyn and hobby good* and »uppllei 5043 Photographic equipment snd »u|>|>llei 505 Metals and Minerals. Eieept Petroleum 5051 Metuls service centers sod offices 5052 Coul nnd other minerals and ore* 506 Electrical Goods 5063 Electrical apparatus snd equipment 5064 Electrical appliances, TV and radios 5065 Electronic luirts und equipment 507 Hardware, Plumbing & Heating Equip- ment 5072 Hardware 5074 Plumbing ft hydronlc heating supplies 5075 Warm sir lieatlne & air conditioning 5078 Refrigeration equipment unit inppllf* 508 Machinery, Equipment, and Supplies 5081 Commercial nuclimcn nnd rrtatlon equlpiufDt ft supplies 509 Miscellaneous Durable Goods 5093 Scrap and waste material* 5094 Jewelry, watches, * precious stooes 5099 Durable goods. Dec Cull Hhort Till* 51 WHOLESALE TKADE— NONDURABLE GOODS Sll Psper and Paper Produeta Sill 1'rlutinf and writing I«|H.T S112 Stutlouery luppllri 5113 Indumriol ft persoosl service paper 512 Drugs, Proprietaries, snd Sundries 5122 I>ruc». proprietaries, soil xundrlen 513 Appsrel, Piece Goods, and Notions 5133 Piece goods 5131 Notions and other dry goodx 5136 Men'n clothing and furnishing* 5137 Women's sod children'* clothing 5139 Footwear 514 Groceries and Related Products 5141 Grocvrtei, general line 5142 Frou-n food* 5143 Duiry products 5144 Poultry aud poultry products 5145 Confectionery 5146 Flsu and seafoods 5147 Meats and meat products 5148 Fresh fruits sod vegetables 5149 Groceries and related product!, nee SIS Farm-Product Raw Materials 5152 Cotton 5153 Grain 5154 Livestock 5159 Farm-product raw materials, nee 516 Chemicals and Allied Products 5161 Chemicals and silled products S17 Petroleum snd Petroleum Products 5171 Petroleum bulk mstioos 4 terminals 5172 Petroleum products, nee SIS B«er, Wine, and Distilled Beverage* SU1 Beer and ale S182 AVioes and distilled beverages 519 Miscellsneous Nondurable Goods 5191 Farm supplies S194 Tobacco and tobacco products S198 Paints, vurnlnhfi, and supplies 5199 Nondurable goods, nee A-332 image: ------- STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION G. RETAIL TRADE L"O<*« Sfcorf Title 52 BUILDING MATERIALS A GARDEN SUPPLIES 521 Lumber and Other Buildinc Material! 5211 Lumber and ottier buildiug muteruiU 523 Paint, Glia-, >.iJ Wallpaper Statin 5231 Paint, glass, aad wallpaper store* 525 hardware Store* 5251 Hardware store* 526 Retail Nurseries and Garden Store* 5261 Retail nurseries and garden store* 527 Mobile Home Dealer* 5271 Mobile borne dealer* S3 GENERAL MERCHANDISE STORES 531 Department Store* 5311 Department atore* 533 Variety Store* 5331 Variety etore* 5)9 Mite. General Merchandise Store* 5399 Misc. ceneral merchandise stores 54 FOOD STORES 541 Grocery Store* 5411 (Grocery store* 542 Meat Marketa and Freezer Provisioner* 5422 Preeter and locker meat proTlsloners 5423 Meat and flail (seafood) markets 543 Fruit Storea and Vegetable Marketa 5431 Fruit store* and vegetable markets 544 Candy. Nut, and Confectionery Store* 5441 Candy, nut. and confectionery stores 545 Dairy Products Store* 5451 Dairy products store* 546 Retail Bakeries 5462 Retail bakeries—baking and selling 5463 Retail bakeries—selling only 549 Miscellaneous Food Store* 5499 Miscellaneous food stores 55 AUTOMOTIVE DEALERS A SERVICE STATIONS 551 New and Uaed Car Dealer* 5511 New and used car dealers 552 Used Car Dealer* 5521 Used car dealers 553 Auto and Horn* Supply Storea 5531 Auto and home supply stores 554 Gasoline Service Stations 5541 Gasoline service etatloo* 'Cut* attar I Till* 555 Boat Dealer* 5551 Boat dealers 556 Reerestion A Utility Trailer Dealera 5561 Kecrvulloii & utility trailer dealers 557 Motoreyrl* n»il.>ri 5571 Motorcycle dealers 559 Automotive Dealer*, nee 5599 Automotive dealers, nee St APPAREL AND ACCESSORY STORES 561 Men's A Boys' Clothing A Furnishings Mil Men's A boys' clothing It furnishings 562 Women's Ready-to-Wear Store* 5621 Women'* ready-to-wear stores 563 Women's Accessory and Specialty Store* 5631 Women's accessory and specialty stores 564 Children's and Infanta' Wear Stores 5641 Children's and infants' wear stores 565 Family Clothing Stores 5651 Family clothing stores 566 Shoe Stores 5661 Sboe stores 568 Furrier* and Fur Shop* 5681 Furriers and fur shops 569 Misccllsneous Apparel A Accessories 5699 Miscellaneous apparel & accesaories 57 FURNITURE AND HOME FURNISH- INGS STORES 571 Furniture and Home Furnishings Store* 5712 Furniture stores S713 Floor covering store* 5714 Drapery snd upholstery storea 5719 Misc. home furnishings store* S72 Household Appliance Stores 5722 Household uppllance stores S73 Radio, Television, and Music Store* 5732 Radio and television stores 5733 Music stores SB EATING AND DRINKING PLACES 581 Eating and Drinking Places 5812 Eating places 5813 Drinking place* 59 MISCELLANEOUS RETAIL 591 Drug Store* and Proprietary Stores 5912 Drug stores and proprietary stores A-333 image: ------- LIST OF SHORT SIC TITLES Cat* Ifcert Till* 592 Liquor Store* 5921 Liquor More* 593 Used Merchandise Store* 5931 UaeU merchandise score* 594 Miscellaneous Shopping Good* Store* 5941 Sporting good* and bicycle shop* $942 Book store* 5943 Stationery Jtorea 5944 Jewelry More* SMS Hobby, toy. and gams shop* 5946 Camera 4 photographic supply itores S947 Gift, novelty, anil souvenir thop* 5948 Luggage and leather food* (tore* S949 Sewing, needlework, and piece food* C«rf« t**ri TUlt 596 Monitor* Retailer* 5961 Uail order house* 5962 .Mi-rrlmmliMiii; machine operator* 5963 Direct selling orcanlzatlona 59H Fuel and Ice Dealer* 5982 fuel and Ice dealers, Dec 5983 Fuel oil dealer* 5984 Lloueflnl (wtroleum fu» dealer* 599 Retail Store*, nee 5992 Fiorina 5993 Cigar (tore* and itaod* 5994 New* dealer* and newsatanda 5999 Miscellaneous retail (tore*, nee H. FINANCE, INSURANCE, AND REAL ESTATE Ctit faerf TUlt M BANKING MI Federal R««erre Bank* Mil Federal Reaerre toanka 602 Commercial aad Stock Savinga Banka M22 State banks, Federal Reserve 6023 State banks, not Fetl. Reserve, FDIC 6024 State hanks, not Fed R«-s., not FDIC 6025 National banlu. Federal Reserve 6026 Notional banks, not Fed. Res., FDIC M27 National bank*, not FDIC 6028 Prirate bank*, not incorp., not FDIC 603 Mutual Savinga Bank* 6032 Mutual *nvlnt> banks. Federal Reserve 6033 Mutual so tine* bank*, nee 6034 Mutual aavlnc* banks, not FDIC M4 Trust Companies, Nondepoiit 6042 Nondepoiit truit*. Federal Reaerre 6044 iNondepoalt trust*, not FDIC 605 Function* Closely Related to Banking MS2 Foreign eicbaofe eatabllabment* 1054 Safe deposit companies 6055 Clearinghouse awioclatlona 6056 Corporal tons for banklne abroad M59 Function* related to banking, nee 61 CREDIT AGENCIES OTHER THAN BANKS 611 Rediscount and Financing Institutions 6112 Rediscounting, not for agricultural 611) Rediacountlng. for agricultural 612 Saving* and Loan Aiaoeiation* 6122 Knlerul .siivliicx & loon imoclatlons 6)23 State associations. Insured 6124 State associations, noninsured. FHLB Ctdt lk»rt TUlt 6125 State associations, noninsured. nee 613 Agricultural Credit Institutions 6131 Agricultural credit Institution* 614 Personal Credit Institutions 6142 Federal credit unions 6143 State credit union* 6144 Nondeposlt Industrial loan companies 6145 Licensed small loan lenders 6146 Installment sales flat DC* companies 6149 Misc. personal credit Institutions 615 Business Credit Institutions 6153 Short-term business credit 6159 Misc. business credit institutions 616 Mortgage Rankers and Broken 6162 Mortgage bankers and correspondents 6163 .Loan broker* 62 SECURITY. COMMODITY BROKERS A SERVICES 621 Security Broken and Dealer* 6311 Security broken and dealera 622 Commodity Contract* Broker*. Dealers 6221 Commodity contract* brokers, dealers 623 Security and Commodity Exchange* 6231 Security sod commodity exchanges 628 Security and Commodity Service* 6281 Security and commodity services 63 INSURANCE CARRIERS 631 Life Insurance 6311 Lift- Insurance 632 Medical Service and Health Insurance 6321 Arrlrivnt nnd henMh Insurance 6324 Ho»|>iUl aud medluil servlc« plan* A-3 34 image: ------- STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION Co,H 633 6331 635 6351 636 6361 637 6371 639 6399 (4 65 651 6612 6513 6514 6515 6517 6519 653 6531 CoJ. 70 701 7011 702 7021 703 7032 7033 704 7041 72 721 7211 7212 7213 7214 721S 7216 JAorl Title Fire, Marine, and Casualty Insurant! Kire. marine, and casually insurance Surety Insurance Surety Insurance Title Insurance Title Iniurance Ptnaio.i, Htilth, and Welfare Funda Pension, health, and welfare fuada Inauranee Carriers, nee Iniurance carriers, nee INSURANCE AGENTS, BROKERS J SERVICE (41 Insurance Agents. Broken * Set-rice 6411 Insurance agenti, broken tt service REAL ESTATE Real Estate Operators and Lesaors Nonmidenttal building operator* Apartment building oiwratora Dwelling operators, exc. apartments Mobile home lite operators Railroad property Iciiurs Real property lessors, noe Real Estate Afenta and Managers Beat estate afents and managers Corf* «»ort Title 654 Title Abstrsct Offices 6.1.11 Title iiliMriict uflirus 655 Subdividers and Developers 6552 Subillviilvrs and dereloiwrx, ncc 6553 Cemetery subdivlden and developers 66 COMBINED REAL ESTATE, INSUR- ANCE, ETC 661 Combined Real Estate, Insurance, etc 6611 Combined real estate. Insurance, etc 67 HOLDING AND OTHER INVEST- >IENT OFFICES (71 Holdjng Offices (711 Holding offices 672 Investment Offices (722 Management Investment, open-end (723 Management investment, closed-end 6724 Unit Investment trusts (725 Face-amount certificate offices 673 Trusts 6732 Educational, religious, etc. trusts 6733 Trusts, nee 679 Miscellaneous Investing 6792 Oil royalty traden 6793 Commodity traders 6794 Patent owners and lessors 6799 Investors, nee I. SERVICES •»ort TWt HOTELS AND OTHER LODGING PLACES Hotels, Motels, and Tourist Courts Hoteli, motel*, and tourist courts Rooming and Boarding Houses Rooming and boarding houses Camps and Trailering Parka gnorting and recreational i-amps Trailcring park* for transients Membership-Basis Organization Hotels Membership-basis organization hotels PERSONAL SERVICES Laundry, Cleaning, A Garment Service* Power laundries, family & commercial Garment pressing & cleaner*' agents Linen supply Diaper service Coin-operated laundries and cleaning Dry cleaning plants, eicept rug C«f* ffttrt rm« 7217 Carpet ami upholstery cleaning 7218 Industrial laundcrers 7219 Laundry nnd inirment services, nee 722 Photographic Studios, Portrait 7221 Pliotngniphlc studios, portrait 723 Besuty Shops 7231 Beauty shop* 724 Barber Shops 7241 Onrbvr shops 725 Shoe Repair and Hat Geaning Shops 72S1 Shoe reimlr ond hat cleaning shops 726 Funeral Service and Crematories 72(1 Funeral service nnd crematories 729 Miscellaneous Personal Services 7299 Mlscvllancuun personal services 73 BUSINESS SERVICES 731 Advertising 7311 Advertising agenda* 7312 Outdoor advertising service* A-335 image: ------- LIST OF SHORT SIC TITLES 7313 7319 732 7321 733 7331 7332 7333 7339 734 7341 7342 7349 735 73S1 736 7361 7362 7369 737 7372 7374 7379 739 7391 7392 7393 7394 7395 7396 7397 7399 75 751 7512 7513 7519 752 7523 7525 753 7531 7534 7535 7538 7539 724 7542 7549 •»•« Til It Radio. TV. publisher representatives Ailvi-rtlslng. nee Credit Reporting and Collection Credit reporting une distribution for TV 7829 Motion picture distribution services 783 Motion Picture Theaters 7832 Motion picture (beaten, ex drive-In 7833 Drive-in motion picture tbeaten 79 AMUSEMENT * RECREATION SERV- ICES 791 Dance Halls. Studios, and Schools 7911 Dance bnlls. »tudioi. snil schools 792 Producers, Orchestras, Entertainers 7922 Tliciitricol producers and services 7929 Entertainers & entertainment groups 793 Bowling and Billiard Establishments 7932 Billiard and pool establishments 7933 Bowling alleys 794 Commercial Sports 7941 Sports clubs and promoters 7948 Racing. Including track operation 799 Misc. Amusement, Recreational Services 7992 Public golf courses 7993 Coin-operated amusement devices 7996 Amuviiieot parks 7997 MemlHTshlp sports A recreation clubs 7999 Amusement and recreation, oer 80 HEALTH SERVICES 801 Offices of Physicians 8011 OtAces of physicians 802 Offices of Dentists 8021 Otnces of dentists A-336 image: ------- STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION Corf* *ft«rt Title 103 Office* of Oiteopathic Physicians 8031 OlflcvH of oKpnixithic i>l>y»icmc» 104 Offices of Other Health Practitioners 8041 Offices of chiropractors 8042 Office* of optometrists 8049 Offlce* of ben lib practitioners, nee 805 Nursing snd Personal Care Facilities 8051 Skilled nursing cm re facilities 8059 Nursing and personal esre, nee 806 Hospitals SOU General medical * snrglcal hospitals 8063 Psychiatric hospitals 8069 Specially hospitals, ere. psychiatric 807 Medical and DenUl Laborstoriea 8071 Medical laboratories 8072 Dental laboratories 808 Outpatient Care Facilities 8081 Outpatient core facilities 809 Health and Allied Services, nee 8091 Health and allied serrlces, nee 81 LEGAL SERVICES 811 Lefal Services 8111 Legal serrlces 82 EDUCATIONAL SERVICES 821 Elementary snd Seeondsry Schools 8211 Elementary and secondary school* 822 Colleges sad Universities 8221 Colleges and universities, nee 8222 Junior colleges 823 Libraries and Information Centera 8231 Libraries and information centers 824 Correspondence and Vocational Schools 8241 Correspondence schools 8243 Dsta processing schools 8244 Business and secretarial schools 8249 Vocational schools, nee 829 Schools A Educational Services, nee 8299 Schools 4 educational services, nee 83 SOCIAL SERVICES 832 Individual and Family Services 8321 Individual and family services S33 Job Training and Related Service* Ctiti ftorf THI* 8331 Jnli training; and related services 835 Child Day Car* Services 83S1 Child day care services 836 Residential Care 8361 Residential care 839 Social Services, nee 6399 Socini services, nee 84 MUSEUMS. BOTANICAL. ZOOLOG- ICAL GARDENS 841 Museums snd Art Galleries 8411 Museums and art galleries 842 Botanical and Zoological Gardena 8421 Botanical and soologlcal garden* 86 MEMBERSHIP ORGANIZATIONS 861 Business Associationa 8611 Business sssoclatlons 862 Professional Organizations 8621 Professional organizations 863 Labor Organizationa 8631 Labor organisations 864 Civic and Social Associations 8641 Civic snd social associations 865 Political Organizations 8651 Political organizations 866 Religious Orgsnizstions 8661 Religion* orpinlz.itIons 869 Membership Organizationa, nee 8699 Membership organizations, nee 88 PRIVATE HOUSEHOLDS 881 Private Households 8811 Private households 89 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES 891 Engineering & Architectural Services 8911 Engineering & architectural services 892 Noncommercial Research Organizations 8922 Noncommercial research oreanizatlons 893 Accounting, Auditing A Bookkeeping 8931 Accounting, auditing & bookkeeping 899 Services, nee 8999 Services, nee A-337 image: -------