Eliminating CFC-113 and Methyl Chloroform
     in Precision Cleaning Operations
                    Final
                 June 1991
              Revised October 1994
                                Printed on Recycled Paper

-------

-------
       ELIMINATING CFC-113 AND METHYL CHLOROFORM
                 IN  PRECISION  CLEANING OPERATIONS
                                               by

                             1COLP Technical Committee*
                                   Bryan Baxter (Chairman)
                                         Abyd Karmali
                                          Farzan Riza
                                        John Stemniski
                                       Ron Stephenson
                                     Richard Szymanowski
                                         David Vickers
                                         Bob Woodwell
                                     Stephen O. Andersen
                            U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                         Revised by

                Stephen O. Andersen, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                   Nina Bonneiycke, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                     John Sparks, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                Michael Zatz, ICF Incorporated
 *  ICOLP is the International Cooperative for Ozone Layer Protection  ICOLP corporate member companies include AT&T, British
f Aerospace Delense. Ford Motor Company, Hitachi, Honeywell, IBM Corporation, Mitsubishi Electric CorporationvMotoroIa Corporation,
 Ontario Hydro, Northern Telecom, Texas Instruments, and Toshiba Corporation, Industry association affiliates include American
 hlectronies Association. Association Pour la Research et Development des Methodes et Processus Indusineli, CANACINTRA (Mexico).
 Center lor Global Change, Electronic Industries Association. Halogenated Solvents Industry Alliance (U.S.), Industrial Technology
 Research Institute of Taiwan. Japan Electrical Manufacturers Association. Korea Ann-Pollution Movement, and Korea Specialty Chemical
 Industry Association  Government xand NGO affiliates include the City of Irvine (CA), National Academy of Engineering, Research
 Tnangle Institute, Russian Institute of .Applied Chemistry, Russian Ministry of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources. Swedish
 National Environmental Protection Agency. Technology Development Foundation of Turkey, Turkish Ministry of the Environment. I Inited
 Nations Environment Programme. U.S. Air Force, and U.S. Environmental Protection-Agency (EPA)
                                                  <                         %

 Bryan Baxter is employed by British Aerospace; Ron Stephenson is employed by Boeing Company; David Vickers is employed by Digital
 Equipment Corporation, John Stemniski is employed by Draper Laboratory, Bob Woodwell is employed by Honeywell, Abyd Karmali and
 Farzan Riza are employed by ICF Incorporated; and Richard Szymanowski is employed by Northern Telecom  We would like to thank
 the many individuals and companies that provided insight and information that helped produce tins'manual This manual was funded by
 the I !_S. EPA and ICOLP

-------

-------
                                                                                      Ill
                                Disclaimer
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the International Cooperative for Ozone
Layer Protection (ICOLP), the ICOLP committee members, and the companies that employ
the ICOLP committee members do not endorse the cleaning performance, worker safety, or
environmental acceptability of any of the technical  options discussed.  Every cleaning
operation requires, consideration of worker safety and proper disposal of contaminants and
waste products generated from the cleaning processes.  Moreover, as work  continues,
including additional toxicity testing and evaluation under Section  612 (Safe Alternatives
Policy) of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 and elsewhere, more information on the
health, environmental and safety effects of alternatives will become available for use in
selecting among the alternatives discussed in this document.

EPA and ICOLP,  in furnishing or distributing this information, do not make any warranty
or representation, either express or implied, with respect to its accuracy, completeness, or
utility; nor does EPA and ICOLP assume any liability of any kind whatsoever resulting from
the use of%or reliance  upon, any information, material, or procedure contained herein,
including but not limited  to any claims regarding health, safety, environmental effects or fate,
efficacy, or performance, made by the source of the information.

Mention of any company or product in this document is for informational purposes only, and
does not constitute a recommendation of any such company or product, either express  or
implied  by EPA, ICOLP, ICOLP committee members, and the companies that employ the
ICOLP committee members.                  !

-------

-------
                             Table of Contents


 List of Exhibits	 vii

 Foreword	 |	  1
             ! *  .
       The Montreal Protocol	,	1
       International Phaseout Schedules ..	•	1
       Excise Tax,	5
       Cooperative Efforts ..,	  6

 Structure of the Manual	9
                                         I
 Introduction to Precision Cleaning	 11

       Historical Perspective	,	11
       Industries Using CFC-113 and Methyl Chloroform for Precision Cleaning  ..... 12
       Industrial  Dependence on CFC-113 and Methyl Chloroform	.12

 Existing Cleaning Process Characterization	;	 17
                                         i
       Analyze Basting Cleaning Methods  	 17
       Determine if Solvent Cleaning is Necessary	 18
       Analyze Solvent Disposal Procedures ...... ^	 18
       Characterize the Soils  and Their Sources	21
       Characterize the Substrate	 22

 Methodology for Selecting an Alternative Cleaning Process	25
                                                         *
       Organizational	25
       Policy and Regulatory  	;	25
       Technical		... .!	.	25
       Economic	,. 30
       Environmental, Health, and Safety	 30

. Review of the Program	f	 . 33

 Alternatives to CFC-113 and  Methyl Chloroform	35

       "Good Housekeeping"  Practices  . . . . .|	37
       Aqueous Cleaning	39
       Semi-Aqueous Cleaning	......	47
       Pressurized Gases	'. . . 51

-------
                        Table of Contents (Continued)

                                                 •                           \
       Supercritical Fluids	.55
       Gas Plasma Cleaning	59
       Ultraviolet light/Ozone Cleaning Method •	f	 ^.... 61
       CO2 Snow	63
       Aliphatic Hydrocarbons	i....... 65
       Perfluorocarbons ... —	."	.67
       Alcohol Cleaning with Perfluorocarbon	,	69
       Hydrochlorofluorocarbons for Essential Applications	71
     .  N-Methyl-2-Pyrrolidone	77
       Other Organic Solvents 	-	 79
       Other Chlorinated Solvents 	83
       Volatile Methyl Siloxanes		...»	87
                                                                          ; '
 Wastewater Minimization and Treatment	 91

       Pre-Treatment of Water		91
       Post-Treatment of Water	91
       Wastewater Quality	92
       Wastewater Minimization	92
       Wastewater Treatment Technologies  	94
       Conceptual Design of a Wastewater Treatment System	 97
       Contract Hauling of Wastewater	97

 Summary and Review	.,.../..	99

 Case Studies of Industrial Practices	'.	  101

       Case Study #1:  Aqueous Process for  Cleaning Disk Drives	  103
       Case Study #2:  Alcohol with Perfluorocarbon Cleaning Process	  105
       Case Study #3:  Aqueous Processes for Cleaning Inertial System Parts .....  109

 References .,	'.	  Ill,

"Glossary	'.	„	  115

 Appendix A - International Cooperative for Ozone Layer Protection	  119

 Appendix B - List of Vendors tor CFC-113 and Methyl Chloroform Solvent
             Cleaning Substitutes	  121

-------
                                    List of Exhibits
     Exhibit 1     Parties to the Montreal Protocol  	2
     Exhibit 2     Successful Corporate Ozone-Depleting Solvent Phaseouts	3
     Exhibit 3     Size Comparison of Computer Disk Drive Head Clearance with
                  Various Contaminants	13
     Exhibit 4     Principal Properties of CFC-113 and Methyl Chloroform  .	1.....  15
     Exhibit 5     CFC-113 and Methyl Chloroform Usage Profile ...			19
     Exhibit 6     Aqueous Cleaning:  Advantages and Disadvantages	 40
     Exhibit 7     Aqueous Cleaning Process Equipment	42
     Exhibit 8     Configuration of Aqueous Cleaning Process	:	44
     Exhibit 9     Semi-Aqueous Process for Immiscible Hydrocarbon Solvent  .	49
     Exhibit 10    Data for Typical Supercritical Solvents	 56
     Exhibit 11    Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Applications	57
     Exhibit 12    Basic Model Design for Carbon Dioxide Supercritical Cleaning System . 58
     Exhibit 13    Properties of Aliphatic Solvents .... —	66
     Exhibit 14    Perfluorocarbon (PFC) Compatibility with Various Materials ........ 68
     Exhibit 15    Physical Properties of HCFCs and Other Solvent Blends  	71
     Exhibit 16a   Advanced Design Degreaser for Use with Low Boiling Point
                  Solvents   	L	74
     Exhibit 16b   Advanced Design Degreaser for Use with Low Boiling Point
                  Solvents	•	.'	75
     Exhibit 16c   Stacked Low Emission pegreaser With Solvent Saving
                  Features  	76
     Exhibit 17    Summary of Properties of N-Methyl-2-Pyrrolidone  ,	 77
     Exhibit 18    NMP Cleaning Processes	78
     Exhibit 19    Properties of Ketones 	•'....,	81
     Exhibit 20    Properties of Alcohols	 82
     Exhibit 21    Control Equipment Combinations and Alternative Idling Limits
                  under NESHAPs	 ;	84
     Exhibit 22    Alternative Total Emissions Limits under NESHAPs  	'.	85
     Exhibit 23    Properties of Chlorinated Solvents	 "85
'    Exhibit 24    Properties of Sample VMS Blends	88
     Exhibit 25    Compatibility of Sample VMS Blends with Elastomers	 88
    / Exhibit 26    Compatibility of Sample VMS Blends with Plastics	89
     Exhibit 27    Semi-Continuous Wastewater Treatment Process	*	98
     Exhibit 28    Diagram of Functional Prototype Alcohol with Periluorocarbon
                  Cleaning Machine	 .	  107

-------
Vlll

-------
 FOREWORD
 This manual bas been developed jointly by the
 International  Cooperative  for   Ozone  Layer
 Protection (ICOLP) and the U.S. Environmental
 Protection Agency (EPA) to aid the phaseout of
 ozone-depleting  substances (ODSs)  in precision
 cleaning applications.   It will prove useful to
 manufacturers world-wide because the procedures
 used  to  precision  clean  parts  apply to  all
 manufacturers, regardless of location  or size. The
 manual has been prepared by the U.S. EPA and an
 international  committee of  experts  from  the
 solvent cleaning industry.   Committee members
 represent both developed and developing countries.

 The manual .describes a step-by-step approach for
 characterizing the use of ozone-depleting solvents
 and identifying and evaluating alternatives. It is a
 "how-to" document which describes all of the steps
 necessary to successfully phase out the use of CFC-
 113 and methyl  chloroform  (MCF)  in precision
 cleaning applications.  Many of the alternatives
 described are currently in use at major companies
 around the world.  The manual addresses primary
 cleaning applications and gives brief descriptions of
 the commercially available alternatives to CFC-113
 and  MCF.   The  manual   provides  sufficient
 technical information on the solvent alternatives to
 enable users to gather more detailed information
 on  their alternatives  of choice.    A 'list  of
 equipment and materials vendors is provided to
 facilitate such further research.
 The  Montreal Protocol
 The 1987 Montreal Protocol on Substances that
.Deplete the Ozone Layer and subsequent 1990 and
 1992 amendments and adjustments control the
 production   and   consumption  of   ODSs
 internationally.  As a result of the most recent
 meetings in Copenhagen in ^November 1992, two
 chemicals commonly used as solvents are scheduled
 to be phased out.  The chlorofluorocarbon 1,1,2-
 trichloro-l,2,2-trifluoroethane (commonly referred
 to   as  CFC-113)  and   1,1,1-triehloroethane
 (commonly referred to as  methyl  chloroform,or
MCF), will be completely phased out in developed
countries by 1996, and in developing countries
between 2006 and 2015, depending on decisions
taken by the Parties to the Protocol in 1995.  In
addition,  the  1992  amendments •• include  a
developed country production freeze and reduction
schedule for hydroclilorofluorocarbons (HCFCs),
with a phaseout in developed countries by the year
2030.

Exhibit 1 lists the countries that are Parties to-the
Montreal Protocol  as  of February 1994.    In
addition,  many   companies  world-wide have
corporate policies to expedite the phaseout  of
ozone-depleting  chemicals.   Exhibit  2  lists
corporations  around   the world that  have
successfully phased out their use of ODSs.

In addition to providing regulatory schedules for
the phaseout of ODSs,  the Montreal Protocol
established  a fund that will finance the  agreed
incremental costs of phasing out ODSs by eligible
developing countries that are Party to the Protocol.
Eligible countries are defined as those developing
countries having  a total  annual  consumption  of
CFCs of less than 0.3 kg per person, and of MCF
and carbon tetrachloride of less  than 0.2  kg per
person.
International Phaseout
Schedules
Several countries have passed legislation to phase
out CFC-113 and MCF earlier than target dates set
by the Montreal Protocol  in an  effort  to slow
ongoing depletion of the stratospheric ozone layer.
Their policies are summarized below.

Canada                          ,         .

Environment.  Canada,  the   federal   agency
responsible  for  environmental  protection   in
Canada, enacted a CFC phaseout program more
stringent  than   the  Montreal   Protocol.

-------
Environment Canada has also announced a series
of target dates for the phaseout of CFCs in specific
end uses. For solvent cleaning applications such as
metal and precision  cleaning,  it  mandates a
phaseout  of  CFC-113 .by the  end of  1994.
Production, imports, and exports of CFCs are to be
eliminated by January 1, 1996, with a 75 percent
reduction  by January  1,  1994.  "  For carbon
teirachloride, the phaseout date is January 1,1995
— one year earlier than that mandated by the
Montreal Protocol.  Halons were,eliminated by
January 1,1994. Production, imports, and exports
of MCF will be halted by January 1, 1996, with
interim reductions of 50 percent by January  1,
1994, and 85 percent by January 1,1995.

European Community

Under the Single European Act of 1987, the twelve
members of the European Community (EC) are


Algeria
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belgium
Benin "
Bosnia/Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
Brunei Darussalam
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Cameroon
Canada
Central African
Republic
Chile
China
Colombia
Congo
Costa Rica
Cote d'lvoire
Croatia
Cuba
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Dominica
Date February 1994

PARTIES TO
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
EEC
Kji
Finland
France
Gambia
Germany
Ghana
Greece
-Grenada
Guatemala
Guinea
Guyana
Honduras
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jordan
Kenya
Kiribati
Kuwait
Lebanon
Libyan Arab '
Jamahiriya
Liechtenstein

Exhibit I
THE MONTREAL PROTOCOL
Luxembourg
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Malta
Marshall Islands
Mauritius
Mexico
Monaco
Morocco
Myanmar
Namibia
Netherlands
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger •
Nigeria
Norway
Pakistan
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Romania >
Republic of Korea
Russian Federation
St. Kitts and Nevis
St. Lucia
Samoa
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
• .

,
Seychelles
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
South Africa
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sudan _
Swaziland
Sweden
Switzerland
Syrian Arab Republic
Tanzania
Thailand
Togo
Trinidad & Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Tuvalu
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab
Emirates
United Kingdom
United States
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Venezuela
Viet Nam
Yugoslavia
Zambia
Zimbabwe
.-

-------
                                    Exhibit 2

    SUCCESSFUL CORPORATE OZONE-DEPLETING SOLVENT PHASEOUTS
A-dee
ADC Telecommunications
Advanced Micro Devices
Alcatel Network Systems
Apple Computer
Applied Magnetics
Aishin Seiki
Alps Electric
AT&T
Cadillac Gage
Calsonic
Canon
Corbin Russwin Hardware
Casio Computer
Chip Supply
Citizen Watch
Clarion
Compaq Computers
Conner Peripherals
Commms Engine
Diatek
Fuji Photo Film
Fujitsu
Funac
Hams Semiconductors
Hewlett Packard
Hitachi
Hitachi Metals
IBM
Ba Electric
Isuzu Motors
ITT Cannon
Japan Aviation Electronics
Kilovac
Kohyo Seiko
Kyocera
Mabuchi Motor
Matsushita
MDM
Minebea
Minolta Camera
Mitsubishi Electric
Mitsubishi Heavy Industry
Mitsubishi Motors
Mitsui High-tech
Motorola
Murata Erie RA.
Murata Manufacturing
National Semiconductor
NEC
NHK Spnng
Nihon Dempa Kogyo
Nissan
Nissan Diesel Motor
Northern Telecom
NRC
NSK
Olympus Optical
Omron
OTQSPX
Pacific Scientific EKD
Ricoh
Rohm
Sanyo MEG
Sanyo Energy
Seagate Technology
Seiko Epson
Seiko-sha
Sharp
Shm-etsu Polymer
SMC
Sony
Stanley Electtic
Sumitomo Electric
Sumitomo Special Metals
Sun Microsystems
Suzuki Motor
Symmons Industries
Taiyo Yuden
Talley Defense Systems
Thomson Consumer Electronics
3M
Toshiba
Toshiba Display Devices
Toyota Motor
Unisia JECCS
Victor Japan
Yamaha
Yokogawa Electric
Zexel

-------
subject to environmental directives issued by the
EC Governing Council. Members of the EC are
Belgium,  Denmark, Germany, France, Greece,
Great Britain, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the
Netherlands,  Portugal, and  Spain.    Council
Regulation  number 594/91 of March  4,  1991
includes regulatory provisions for the production
of substances  that deplete the ozone layer.  The
EC phaseout schedule for CFC-113 production is
more exacting than the Montreal Protocol.   It
caUed for an  85 percent reduction of CFC-113
production by January  1, 1994 and a  complete
phaseout  by January 1, 1995.  For MCF, the
schedule called for a 50 percent cut in production
by January 1,  1994 and* a complete phaseout by
January 1,1996.  While all members must abide by
these  directives,  Council  Regulation  number
3322/88 of October 31,  1988 states  that EC
members may  take even more extensive unilateral
measures to protect the ozone layer.
European Free-Trade Agreement
Countries

The European Free Trade Agreement  (EFTA)
countries of Austria, Finland,  Iceland,  Norway,
Sweden, and  Switzerland,  have each  adopted
measures  to  completely  phase   out  fully-
halogenated ODSs. Austria, Finland, Norway, and
Sweden will completely phase  out their use of
CFC-113 in all applications by January 1, 1995.
Sweden plans  to ohase out MCF by this date as
well.  In addition, some EFTA countries have set
sector-specific interim phaseout dates for certain
solvent  uses.  Austria phased out CFC-113 in a
number of solvent cleaning applications by January
1,1994. Norway and Sweden eliminated their use
of CFC-113 on July 1,1991 and January 1, 1991,
respectively for all applications except textile dry
cleaning.
Japan

On May 13,  1992, the Ministry of International
Trade  and  Industry  (MITJ)  requested  its  72
Industrial Associations to  phase out CFC  and
MCF usage by the end of 1995.
United States

The U.S. Clean Air Act (CAA), as amended in
1990, contains several provisions pertaining  to
stratospheric ozone  protection.    ODSs  are
categorized by the CAA as either Class I or Class
II substances.  Class I substances include MCF,
three types of halons, carbon tetrachloride, and all
fully-halogenated CFCs, including CFC-113.  Class
II   substances   include   33 t types  of
hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs).' The sections
of the CAA important to users of this manual are
discussed below.

*  Section 112:  Notional Emission Standards for
   Hazardous Air Pollutants

   This section of the  CAA requires the EPA to
   develop emissions standards for 189 chemical
   compounds listed as hazardous air  pollutants
   (HAPs).   The  list of  HAPs  includes the
   chlorinated solvents as well as many  organic
   solvents likely to be used in precision cleaning
   parts.
 ?
*  Section 604 and Section 605:   Phaseout  of
   Production and Consumption of Class I and Class
   II Substances.

   These sections detail the phaseout schedule for
   both  Class I and Class II  substances.  EPA
   accelerated the schedule in response to both
   former President George Bush's  call for a more
   rapid .phaseout and the recent amendments
   made to the Protocol in  Copenhagen.

*  Section 610:  Nonessential Products Containing
   Chlorofluorocarbons          *

   This  provision directs  EPA  to promulgate
   regulations that prohibit the sale or distribution
   of certain "nonessential" products that release'
   Class  I and Class  0  substances during their
   manufacture, use, storage, or disposal.

•  Section 611: Labeling

   This section directed EPA to  issue regulations
   requiring  the labeling of products that contain
   or were manufactured with Class I and Class II
   substances.  Containers  in which Class I and
   Class  II substances are stored must  also be

-------
labeled.   • The  label  will  read  "Warning:
Contains or manufactured with [insert name of
substance], a  substance which  harms  public
health and environment by destroying ozone in
the upper atmosphere*.  Hie label must clearly
identify the ODS by chemical name for easy
recognition by average consumers, and must be
placed  so  that   it  is  clearly  legible  and
conspicuous.

Labeling regulations affecting Class I substances
took  effect  on  May  15,  1993.   Products
containing or manufactured  with a  Class II
substance must be labeled no later than January
1,2015.

Section 612:  Safe Alternatives Polity

Section  612  establishes  a  framework   for
evaluating the overall environmental and human
health impact of current and future alternatives
to ozone-depleting solvents.   Such regulation
ensures  that  ODSs  will  be  replaced  by
substitutes that reduce overall risks to human
health and the environment.   As a result of
provisions set in Section 612, the Environmental
Protection Agency:

•   Issued rules in November 1992 that make it
    unlawful to replace any Class I and Class II
    substance with a substitute that may present
    adverse  effects to human health and  the
    environment when the EPA has identified
    an  available  or   potentially  available
    alternative that can reduce the overall risk
    to human health and the environment.

•   Has   published  a   list   of  prohibited
    substitutes, organized by use sector, and a
    list of the corresponding alternatives;

•   Will accept petitions to add or  delete a
    substance previously listed as a prohibited
    substitute or an acceptable alternative;

•   Requires  any company  that  produces a
    chemical substitute  for a Class I substance
    to notify EPA 90 days before the new or
    existing  chemical   is  introduced into
    commerce as a significant new use of that
    chemical.    In addition,  EPA must  be
    provided with the unpublished health and
    safety studies/data on the substitute.
   To  implement Section  612  EPA  has  (1)
   conducted environmental risk characterizations
   for  substitutes in  each  end  use  and  (2)
   established  the Significant New  Alternatives
   Program (SNAP) to evaluate the substitutes for
   Class  I  substances.    EPA  also  initiated
   discussions  with NIOSH,  OSHA, and  other
  . governmental and nongovernmental associations
   to develop a consensus process for establishing
   occupational  exposure  limits  for the  most
   significant substitute chemicals.  '

   The environmental risk characterizations for the
   substitutes  involve a comprehensive  analysis
   based on the following criteria: ozone-depleting
  .potential, flammabili ty, tosacity, exposure effects,
   energy  efficiency,  degradation impacts, air,
   water, and solid waste/hazardous waste pollution
   effects,    and   global   wanning   potential.
   Economic factors are also considered.  EPA has
   organized these assessments by use sector (i.e.
   solvents,   refrigeration,   etc).    "The   risk
   characterizations result  in  risk-management
   strategies for each sector and substitute.  EPA
   has  also   categorized  each  substance   as
  ' unacceptable, acceptable with limitations on use
   or quantity, acceptable without comment,  or
   delayed pending further study.  Petitions are
   allowed to change a substance's status with the
   burden of proof on the petitioner.

   In  early  1994,  the  EPA issued a  list  of
   alternatives  it  found  to  be acceptable and
   unacceptable according to this framework in  its
   Significant  New Alternatives  Policy (SNAP)
   Program  ruling.  The  list  will  be updated
   regularly as new alternatives become available.
Excise Tax

As  an incentive  to  reduce the production and
consumption of ODSs in the U.S., Congress placed
an excise tax on ODSs manufactured or imported
for  use in the U.S. Taxes do not apply to recycled
chemicals. This tax provides a further incentive to
use alternatives arid  substitutes to CFC-113 and
MCF and to  recycle used chemicals.  The tax
amounts are based  on  each  chemical's ozone-
depleting, potential.  These taxes have recently
been increased as a part of the  U.S. Congress*
comprehensive energy bill of 1992.

-------
Tax Amount
* Calendar Year

1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
Per
CFC-113
$1.096
'$1336
$2.68
$3.48
$4.28
Pound
MCF
$0.137
$0.167
'$0.211
$0.435
SOJ35
Cooperative Efforts


Japan

The Japanese Ozone Layer Protection Act gives its
Ministry of  International  Trade  and • Industry
(MITI) the authorization to issue restrictions on
ODSs. MITI and the Environmental Agency have
established  -the  "Guidelines   for  Discharge
Reduction and Use Rationalization." Based upon
these guidelines, various government agencies have
provided administrative guidance and advice to the
.industries under their  respective  jurisdictions.
Specifically, MITI worked with the Japan Industrial
Conference for Ozone Layer Protection (JICOP)
to prepare two manuals that  provide technical
information on alternatives to CFC-113 and MCF.
The manuals are titled:  '
*  Manual for Phasing-Out 1,1,1-Trichloroethane;
   and

*  Manual for Reduction in the Use of Ozone-
   Depleting Substances.

Mm  "also  encourages  industry  to   reduce
consumption of ODSs through'economic measures
such  as  tax incentives to  promote the  use  of
equipment to recover and reuse solvents.
Sweden

TTie  Government/Industry/Research  Institution
sectors  are  conducting two  major cooperative
efforts  targeting  the  phaseout  of ODSs and
chlorinated solvents:
                                                    • The  TRE-project  (Technology  for  Clean
                                                      Electronics); and

                                                    • The  AMY-project  (Cleaning   of   Metallic
                                                      surfaces).

                                                    In addition, direct support is being provided to
                                                    industry-for industrial scale introduction of new
                                                    technologies.  These are, to name a few, closed
                                                    loop systems, microbiological cleaning systems, ion
                                                    exchange technologies, electrochemical  cleaning
                                                    systems, vacuum  evaporation  systems,  reverse
                                                    osmosis, and alternative solvent-based systems.
United States

EPA  has  been  working  with  industry  to
disseminate information on technically-feasible,
cost-effective,   and   environmentally-sound
alternatives to ODSs.  As part of this effort, the*
Agency, along with ICOLP, prepared a series of
manuals that provide -technical information  on
alternatives to CFC-113 and MCF.  Additional
information  about  ICOLP  can  be found  in
Appendix A.  The manuals are based on actual
industrial experiences and serve as a guide to users
of CFC-113 and MCF worldwide. These manuals
will   be  updated  periodically  as  technical
developments occur.

The complete set of manuals produced includes:

•  Alternatives   for   CFC-113   and   Methyl
   Chloroform in Metal Cleaning.

•  Aqueous and Semi-Aqueous Alternatives  to
   CFC-113 and Methyl  Chloroform  Cleaning of
   Printed Circuit Board Assemblies.

•  Conservation and Recycling Practices for CFC-
   113 and Methyl Chloroform.

•  Eliminating CFC-113 and Methyl Chloroform in
   Aircraft Maintenance Procedures.

•  Eliminating CFC-113 and Methyl Chloroform in
   Precision Cleaning Operations.

•  No-Clean Soldering to Eliminate CFC-113 and
   Methyl Chloroform Cleaning of Printed Circuit
   Board Assemblies.

-------
 This  particular manual provides  those in an
 organization currently cleaning with ODSs with a
 simply-structured program to help eliminate their
 use  of CFC-113  and/or MCF.   Moreover,  it
 'presents alternative processes that can be used in
 precision cleaning.  Many of these processes are
 currently in use around the world, The goal of the
 manual is to:
          *             }
 -  Warn users of  CFC-113 and  MCF of  the
    impending   halt  in  production  and  the
    consequences to their operations;

 *  Identify the currently available and emerging
    alternatives for CFC-113 and MCF;

 •  Provide an  overview of  the  tasks  that  are
    required  to,  successfully   implement  an
    alternative process or chemical;

 •  Provide an  overview • of  the  environmental,
    health, safety, and other factors associated with
    alternatives and the benefits achievable from the
    phaseout of CFC-113 and MCF;

 •  Present  detailed  case studies on the  actual
    industrial applications of these technologies to:

    —   Identify unresolved problems in eliminating
        CFC-113 and MCF; and
                       \
    —   Describe the equipment configuration  of a
        typical facility after it has eliminated its use
        of CFC-113 and MCF.
                                       >

 This manual will benefit all users of CFC-113 and
 MCF   in  the  precision   cleaning   industry.
 Ultimately, however, the success of a CFC-113 and
 MCF elimination strategy will depend upon how
 effectively reduction and elimination programs are
 organized.   Experience  has  also shown that  a
 strong education and training program for workers
 using new processes results in greater efficiency
- and a smooth transition away from CFC-113 and
 MCF.   The development and implementation of
 alternatives to  CFC-113 and MCF for precision
 cleaning   present  a   challenge   for  most
 organizations.  The rewards for success are the
 contribution  to global environmental protection
 and an increase in industrial efficiency.

-------
8

-------
STRUCTURE OF THE MANUAL
This manual is divided into the following sections:
    •  INTRODUCTION TO PRECISION CLEANING

       This section provides some historical background on precision cleaning.  In
       particular, it explains the reasons for industry's dependence on CFC-113 and
       MCF, and describes the factors that define precision cleaning applications.

    •  EXISTING CLEANING PROCESS CHARACTERIZATION

       This section presents the 'initial steps a facility must take in order to reduce and
       eliminate CFC-113 and MCF usage in cleaning procedures. It emphasizes the
       importance of being familiar with the different aspects of the cleaning processes.

    •  METHODOLOGY FOR  SELECTING AN ALTERNATIVE CLEANING
       PROCESS

       This section discusses various organizational, policy, technical, economic, and
       environment, health, and safety issues that should be considered when selecting
       a precision cleaning process.

    •  ALTERNATIVES TO CFC-113 AND METHYL CHLOROFORM

       This section describes the  operational principles, costs, and advantages and
       disadvantages of several alternative technologies.

    •  WASTEWATER MINIMIZATION AND TREATMENT

       This section presents methods to minimize and treat wastewater from aqueous
       and semi-aqueous cleaning  processes.

    •  CASE STUDIES OF INDUSTRIAL PRACTICES

       This  section provides examples  of successful applications  of alternative
       technologies.                     '

-------
10

-------
                                                                                          11
INTRODUCTION TO  PRECISION  CLEANING
Precision cleaning is not easy to define.  For this
reason, we will briefly examine the history of, and
requirements  for,  precision   cleaning.    This
information will describe the characteristics that
help to define  precision  cleaning applications.
CFC-113 and, to a lesser degree, MCF have been
the solvents of choice within the precision cleaning
industry.  In  order to assist a plant in finding
alternatives to CFC-113 and MCF, this manual will
first explain the reasons for industry's historical
dependence on these solvents. This understanding
will be useful in evaluating alternatives later on.
Historical Perspective

Since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution,
industry has been required to clean mechanical
components.   Before assembling manufactured
parts, machining-lubricants and metallic residue
(swarf) must be removed. Aliphatic hydrocarbons
(paraffin, white mineral spirit, Stoddard solvent)
were widely used  in heavy engineering such as
railroads,  bridges, mining,  shipbuilding,  civil
engineering,   and  chemical   plants  where
dimensional tolerances were large and assemblies
were not critically sensitive to contamination. This
technology lasted unchanged for about 150 years.
But  the  technology gradually  changed with  a
growing concern for industrial safety, the need for
increased solvent power, and the manufacturing of
more precise components.

Precision component cleaning required the use of
more effective cleaning technologies than those
traditionally employed in heavy industries.  The
mass production of watches provided the basis for
the "modern precision engineering industry.  The
watch industry required a pure, chemically inert,
nonflammable, and reasonably nontoxic solvent.
This solvent would be used to clean small parts
and finished assemblies, so that  particles (dusts,
metal swarf, etc.) and organic residues (oils, skin
fats, etc.) were removed, and contaminant-free final
assemblies could be made cheaply and quickly.
Pure synthetic solvents filled this requirement.
From this precision engineering basis, the modern
precision engineering industry has grown.  The
specifications  of defense and  space technology
require this industry to  achieve high  levels of
sophistication. Yet, the basic concepts of precision
cleaning are still the same in modern industries.
Precision cleaning requires solvents  with  the
following characteristics:

• A volatile solvent-that leaves no residues;

e Sufficient solvent power to remove organic soils;

» Low surface tension to penetrate small spaces;

* High density  to assist the lift-off  of small
  particles;

• Rapid drying;

» Low cost;

• Low toxicity;                             )

• Nonflammability.

The next section discusses the applications which
require these characteristics.

-------
 12
Industries Using CFC-113
and Methyl Chloroform for
Precision Cleaning

Although precision,cleaning is needed in a wide
range of industries, several key factors define the
applications where precision cleaning is required:
These include those applications in which:
      *  Critical cleanliness standards  of
         paniculate and/or organic contami-
         nants need to be satisfied;

      • - Components have sensitive compati-
         bilities;

      »  'Components   have   physical
         characteristics such as geometry and
         porosity  which  make  dewatering
         crucial in the cleaning process; and

      *  Components  being  cleaned  are
         costly.
The following list provides an indication of the
wide and varied applicability of precision cleaning
operations.

•  Electronics industry

   —  Microelectronics
 *  —  Recording heads and components  for disk
      drives
   ~  Microswitches
   —  Miniature precision potentiometers
   —  Plastic electronics packaging
   —  Servo motors
   —  Solenoids
   —  Slip ring assemblies.

'•  Medical

   —  Heart pacemakers
   —  Prosthesis manufacture
   ~  Contact lenses
   —  Hospital oxygen systems
   --  Kidney dialysis capillaries
                                                                                            \
  —  Hypodermic needles.
                               i
« Defense

  ~  Inertial sensors and platforms
  —  Hydraulic systems for aircraft and missiles
  —  Decontamination of nuclear systems
  —  Decontamination of chemical agents
 ' —  Flushing fuel systems
  -  Ball bearing manufacture and assembly.

» Aerospace

  —  Manufacture of airframe components
  —  Maintenance of avionics, auxiliary power
      generators, oxygen systems, undercarriages,
      flight controls, fuel systems.

A  variety  of paniculate  and  nonparticulate
contaminants are removed in precision cleaning
operations.   Paniculate contamination includes
scrap  material created during cutting, drilling,
grinding,  and buffing  of precision  pans (e.g.,
silicon wafers  and  aluminum  storage  disk
substrates).   Nonparticulate  contamination  in-
cludes waxes (used to hold silicon wafers during
semiconductor manufacturing),  fingerprint oils,
and other contaminants.

As the term suggests, precision cleaning involves
cleaning components to extremely strict standards
of cleanliness. A good indication of the cleaning
ability required for precision cleaning processes is
provided in Exhibit 3, which shows the clearance
on a computer disk drive relative to the  size of
various contaminants.
Industrial Dependence on
CFC-113 and  Methyl
Chloroform

Although CFC-113 and MCF have relatively high
ozone-depleting potentials, they possess  other
properties that, have made them ideal for precision
cleaning.

The  characteristics  that  made CFC-113  the
precision. cleaning  solvent  of  choice  are  its
remarkable chemical stability (manifested directly

-------
                                                       13 _
Jf-
                             Exhibits

        SIZE COMPARISON OF COMPUTER DISK DRIVE
      HEAD CLEARANCE WITH VARIOUS CONTAMINANTS
                                        HUMAN HAIR
                                        .003 INCHES
                                         DIAMETER
                                  LINT AND DUST

                      SMOKE PARTICLE       *
                      250 MICRO INCHES
                        DIAMETER
                             FINGER PRINT
     EDGE OF FLYING HEAD
           FLYING HEAD
           HEIGHT = 15
           MICRO INCHES
     OXIDE COATING (200 MICRO INCHES)
     ALUMINUM SUBSTRATE SURFACE
   Source: Digital Equipment Corporation
                                                         C47034-1

-------
 14
 in its compatibility to structural materials), its low
 tenacity, and nonflammability.  These properties
 have  allowed  closed,  superclean  white-room
 assembly  areas  to  be  operated  safely  and
 effectively.

 Probably  the best example  of the benefits  of
 solvent  compatibility  is  in  the  cleaning  of
 beryllium,  specifically  in the inertial  sensor
 industry.  As the performance requirements  of
 gyros increased for both  defense and aerospace
 applications, there was a need for a  structural
 material that combined low density with  high
 dimensional  stability.   Hot  pressed  beryllium
 satisfied  those  requirements,  with  properties
 unique  among  metals.    It has  one  distinct
 disadvantage — chemical reactivity, especially with
 ionic chlorine.  The availability of CFC-113 as a
 pure, stable cleaning solvent has allowed beryllium
 to be widely used as a structural material.

 Another advantage of CFC-113 is its solvent
 abilities with high density polychlorofluoroethylene
 and polybromofluoroethylene compounds:  liquids
 with densities of 1.8 to  2.4  g/cm3  (at  158°F  to
 !76°F).  These compounds are used as flotation
 fluids in the gyro industry and are not soluble in
 common solvents.  Furthermore, flotation fluids
 may contain other polymeric additives as property
 modifiers  that must not be affected by whatever
 solvent  is used.  CFC-113 is compatible with all
 current  flotation fluids and is extremely useful in
 this application.

 MCF is also used in some  precision  cleaning
 applications (e.g., medical). Its physical properties,
 including its solvency, evaporation rate, and higher
 boiling  point,  make it  an  ideal  product for
 removing  certain soils.  Like CFC-113, MCF is
 both nonflammable and low in toxicity. The lower
 cost  of  MCF is also a reason  for its use  as  a
 cleaner.

. Exhibit  4 provides a comprehensive list  of the
 principal properties of CFC-113 and MCF.

-------
                                                                        15
                          Exhibit 4

       PRINCIPAL PROPERTIES OF CFC-113
            AND METHYL CHLOROFORM
Formula

Molecular Weight

Pounds Per Gallon at 68°F          ;

Boiling Point °F

Freezing Point °F               '

Coefficient of Expansion Per °F

Surface Tension At 68°F Dynes/cm

Solubility % By Weight at 68°F -
 In Water                        ;
 Of Water

Flash Point (Tag  Closed Cup) °F

Flammable Limits % By Volume in Air;
 Lower                         t
 Upper

Toxicity P.EJL in PPM*            |

Specific Heat Liquid At 68°F        j
 Btu/(lb)(°F)

Latent Heat of vaporization at
 B.P. Btn/n>                      I
                                i
                    *            i
Kauri-Butano] Value               !
   CFC-113

CCI2FCCIF2

187.39

13.16

117.63

-31

0.00089

19.6
0.017
6.0086

None
Nonflammable
Nonflammable

1000
0.22


63.12

31
                                                         MCF
CH3-CC13

133.4

11.16

165.20

-30.4

0.00008

25.56
0.15
0.03

None
8.0
10.5

350
0.43


103.18

124
* P.E.L. is the Permissible Exposure Limit as defined under the Occupational
Safety and Health Act.
Source: DuPont Company, Handbook of Standards for Solvents.

-------
16

-------
                                                                                        17
EXISTING CLEANING  PROCESS
CHARACTERIZATION
The  first  step  in  reducing  and  eventually
eliminating  the  use  of  CFC-113 and MCF in
precision cleaning  is designating a team  to
coordinate the effort.   Team members should
represent various plant functions including process
design, production and  production engineering,
environmental control, occupational  health and
safety, quality control, and purchasing.

to order for the team  to develop an  effective
program, it  must first  acquire a  good overall
knowledge of existing cleaning processes within its
facility.  This knowledge will help the team to
identify and prioritize the cleaning operations to
which it must direct its attention.   Once  these
operations are identified, the team can analyze the
processes to reduce CFC-113/MCF  usage and
determine  cleaning  requirements  so  that  an
optimal  alternative may be selected for  each
application.

Acquiring an adequate knowledge of the precision
cleaning processes in a facility can be accomplished
through  the  use  of surveys. The team should
determine the^quantities of CFC-113 and  MCF
used in every aspect of the plant's operations. If
possible, the team should also visit the cleaning
shop(s) to observe existing procedures, interview
operators, and collect substrate and soil samples
for laboratory tests.  The study should include a
flow chart of each manufacturing or maintenance
process as well  as tabular summaries  of  soils,
substrates, and part  geometry.  Conducting the
survey will allow the team to establish contacts and
develop  rapport with the individuals who will
ultimately be affected by  the process change.  The
cooperation  and  input  of these individuals is
essential to the success of the phaseout program.

After the study has been ..completed, the  team
should be  able  to  characterize the  different
cleaning operations in the plant.  The following
sections suggest typical questions the team should
be able to answer about existing cleaning
processes,  disposal' practices,  the  soils  being
removed, and the substrates being cleaned.
Analyze   Existing   Cleaning
Methods

In order to reduce and eliminate the use of CFC-
113 and MCF in precision cleaning, the team must
identify and analyze all of the processes that use
these substances.  Questions the team should be
able to answer include:
         What processes incorporate CFC-
         113 and MCF?

         What quantity of CFC-113 and MCF
         is used in each process?

         Where do CFC-113'and MCF losses
         occur?

         Where does cleaning take place in
         the facility?

         What percentage of the time are the
         cleaning machines in use?

         How many parts are cleaned per day
         per machine?
An effective way to collect such information is
through a written survey.   Exhibit  5 shows  an
example  of  a  survey that -can  be used  to
characterize CFC-113 and  MCF usage  in  all
aspects of the  plant's operations. Of course, this
survey should  be modified  to fit each individual
plant.

-------
 18
In. facilities where CFC-113 and  MCF  use is
extensive, the information gathered using surveys
and other -means can be stored in an electronic
database for future use.   Hie creation of a
comprehensive  database will allow the team to
monitor progress and to pinpoint areas  in  the
facility where consumption of ODSs remains high.
Facilities may choose to design the tracking system
themselves, hire a firm to create a custom system,
or purchase an existing system.
           •      >
Through familiarizing itself, with  current usage
patterns, the team will  not only know which
cleaning operations can utilize currently available
alternative cleaning  methods, but also  which,
operations can  reduce their use of CFC-113 and
MCF  until  an  acceptable method  becomes
available.  .

If the team finds that CFC-113 and MCF losses are
fairly high, they may suggest ways to" curb the loss,
such as using covers on vapor degreasers and using
wipe cloths and storage bags  to save spilled CFC-
113/MCF.  Taking such measures will help  the
plant reduce its use of ozone  depleting substances
until an alternative, .CMOS-free method is chosen.
Determine if Solvent
Cleaning Is Necessary

After identifying the processes where solvents are
being used, the next step is to determine whether
each cleaning step is necessary.  The goal is to
pinpoint ways the plant can:

   •   improve housekeeping to eliminate ODS
      use

   *  * change production materials or processes to
      reduce or eliminate the soiling of parts

   *   change production materials so the soils can
      be   cleaned  using  non-ODS  cleaning
      technologies.

   *   consolidate operations

Practicing good t housekeeping measures involves
identifying all the CFC-113 and MCF uses within
a plant  and determining  whether these solvents
were intended for use in each application.   In
many cases, the ozone-depleting substances are
used unnecessarily because of their convenience
and  excellent  cleaning  characteristics.     By
restricting CFC-113 and MCF use to intended or
essential applications,  a  plant can significantly
reduce its use of these solvents. Further discussion
of good housekeeping practices can be found in
the Alternative Materials and Processes section of
the manual.

Another way a plant can reduce or eliminate the
use of CFC-113 or  MCF is by evaluating the
process that occurs before solvent cleaning, to see
if changing the materials or the process itself can
eliminate the soiling of parts or change the nature
of the soil. In doing this, a plant  may render
'precision   cleaning  with  CFC-113  or  MCF
unnecessary.

Whenever it is possible, a plant should separate
components that require precision cleaning from
those needing only gross cleaning.

Once  all  'the  unnecessary solvent cleaning
operations  are eliminated, the plant may want to
consider consolidating remaining operations into
one or a few locations. This will free-up floor
space within the plant, make it easier to keep track
of CFC-113 and MCF consumption, and possibly
lower operating costs through reduced electricity
and solvent use.
Analyze    Solvent    Disposal
Procedures

In addition to analyzing the cleaning processes, the
team  should also analyze the  facility's disposal
practices.  Being familiar with  disposal practices
will aid,the team in further reducing CFC-113 and
MCF usage.  Questions the team should be able to,
answer include:
      How   is   CFC-113  and   MCF
      reclaimed/disposed of after use?

      How often is the CFC-113 and MCF
      replaced in degreasing processes?

-------
                                                                                19
                                    Exhibit 5

     CFC-113 AND METHYL CHLOROFORM USAGE PROFILE
SHOP NAME & LOCATION:
NAME OF CONTACT IN SHOP:
A. PROCESS

   Parts Cleaned (be as specific as possible):
   Current Cleaning Method (e.g,  open-top vapor degreasing, conveyorfced vapor degreasing, cold
   cleaning, dip tank, hand-wipe, aerosol, etc.):
   Number of Cleaning Machines in Shop Which Use CFC-113 or MCF:
   Controls on Cleaning Equipment (e.g. covers, extended freeboard, cooling coils, etc.):
   Other Uses (e.g., carriers, drying):
   Substrates Typically Cleaned:
   Soils Typically Removed (e.g., dirt, oil, grease) (attach MSDS for the soil if available):
   Standards to be met (e.g., military, ASTM):

-------
20
      B.  PRODUCTS USED

        Generic Name of Solvent (circle one; use one survey for each chemical):

        CFC-113      .MCF (1,1,1-trichloroethane)

        Tirade Name of Solvent (e.g. Daiflon 113, Freon TF, Chlorothene SM, Triethane) (see Appendix
        C for additional tradenames):



        Manufacturer (e.g.  Daikin, DuPont, Dow, PPG) (see Appendix C for additional manufacturers):
      C. USE HISTORY

        Quantity Purchased and Used Yearly, specify units (e,g, liters, gallons):
                      PURCHASED (quantity of solvent
                      purchased or requisitioned by this
                      shop for cleaning)	
USED (quantity of solvent
consumed in this shop for cleaning)
         1991
         1992
         1993
         1994
        D.  CFC-113 AND MCF DISPOSAL PRACTICES

Quantity shipped out as
waste for disposal (specify
units):
Disposal costs:
Quantity shipped out for
recycling (specify units):
Cost of recycling:
Quantity recycled on site
(specify units):
Quantity lost to the
environment1 (through
leakage, spillage, testing,
dragout, evaporation,
etc.) (specify units)
1991






1992






1993






1994



-

i ,
      1  This quantity can be calculated as follows: Quantity Lost = Quantity Purchased - Quantity
      shipped out as waste.-

      NOTE: The total quantity of CFC-113 and MCF used should be divided by the quantity of goods produced to obtain the
      ratio of kilograms or pounds of CFC-113 and MCF used per production unit* This value can be a benchmark for
      reduction and elimination programs.

-------
                                                                                                 21
  The team should ensure that the used CFC-113
  and MCF is being treated and disposed of safely.
  An evaluation of disposal techniques will allow the
  team to investigate whether these solvents can be
  used for longer periods of time prior to disposal,
  thus further reducing the facility's usage of CFC-
  113 and MCF.  In addition, the team will be able
  to evaluate the possibility of using spent solvent in
  subsequent cleaning operations where pure solvent
  is not needed.
  Characterize the Soils and
  Their Sources

  An  important  step in  characterizing  existing
  cleaning processes is identifying the soils to be
  removed and their sources. The purpose of this
  step is either to:  1) identify ways to eliminate the
  need for cleaning or reduce the amount of soil to
  be removed, or 2)  select an alternative that can
  remove the identified soil from  parts.  A plant
  should be able to answer the following questions
  when identifying soils:
   presents some physical characteristics that can
   be used to identify and compare particulates.
     • What type of soils are being removed?

     • Where are the soils coming from?

     » What are the  performance conditions
       around the substrate and soil (e.g.  heat,
       cold, high stress)?

     » Why is  the soil  being removed  (e.g.
       performance requirements,  inspection,
       appearance)?
  Soils removed through precision cleaning can be
.  generally classified into two groups:

  *  Paniculate  contamination   often  must  be
    identified  with  methods  such  as  optical'
    microscopy.  Most  optical and microchemical
    methods are  sensitive  to the  nanogram  or
    picogram level.  It  is better to perform the
    laboratory  analysis of soils in-house.  Sending
    contamination  samples  out  risks   further
    contamination of the sample.  The following list
      Morphological
      • Size
      * Shape factor
      • Crystal structure
      • Interface angles
      • Ratios
      • Cleavage
      * Invariants   derived   from
        transform coefficients
      * Surface features
                                                                                          fourier
      Optical Properties
      • Refractive index
      * Dispersion (variation and  refractive
        index with frequency or wavelength)
      • Isotropy versus anistropy
      • Birefringence
      • Extraction angles
      • Pleochrois'tn

      Microchemisiry
      • Precipitation reactions
      • Recrystallization
      • Solubility data
      • Electronic series (plate out) of metals
   A matrix of characteristics can  be gradually
   developed for each type of particle contaminant
   found.  A publication known as The Particle
   Atlas" (see reference list) can help narrow the
   range of possibilities to be evaluated.

*  Thin film  chemical contamination occurs in
   many precision  components.  Sources of thin
   film chemicals include outgassing from sources
   such as lubricants^ adhesives, coatings, polymeric
   and elastomeric materials.  Chemical residues
"   can   also  originate  from  sources such1 as
   fingerprints,  machining  fluids, coolants, and
   packaging.  Methods  to  test the ability of the
1   cleaning process in removing thin film chemical
   contamination are discussed later in the manual.

There  are five additiona.l categories of soils that
are more often associated with  gross  cleaning
rather  than precision cleaning operations, but are

-------
 22
 described below for completeness.

 * "Pigmented drawing  compounds are  used in.
   process steps where the  metal is extruded
   through  dies  to produce  parts.   The  most
  ..commonly used pigmented compounds contain
   one or  more of the  following  substances:
   •whiting, lithopone, mica, zinc oxide, bentonite,
   flour,  graphite,  white lead,  molybdenum
   disulfide, titanium dioxide, and soaps.

 * Unpigmented  oil and grease include common
   shop oils and greases such as drawing lubricants,
   rust preventive oils, and quenching oils.

 * Forming  lubricants  and   fluids  used  for
   machining  can  be  classified  into  three
   subgroups:  (1) hydrocarbon-based oils:  plain
   or  sulfurized  mineral  and fatty • oils  (or  a
   combination of the two),  chlorinated mineral
   oils, and sulfurized chlorinated mineral oils, (2)
   soluble/emulsifiable oils: conventional or heavy
   duty soluble oils containing  sulfur or other
   compounds, glycol  ethers,, glycols or  other
   emulsifiers  added,   and  (3)  water  soluble
   (synthetics):   chemical  cutting fluids  that are
,   water soluble and contain soaps, amines, sodium
   salts of  sulfonated fatty  alcohols, and alkyl
   aromatic salts  of sulfonates.

 * Polishing and  buffing compounds can also be
   classified  into three subgroups: (1) liquids:
   mineral  oils  and oil-in-water  emulsions or
   animal  and  vegetable- oils  with  abrasive
   materials, (2) semi-solids: oil-based containing
   abrasives   and  emulsions  or  water-based
   containing abrasive  and dispersing agents, and
   (3)  solids:  grease  containing  stearic  acid,
   hydrogenated fatty acids, tallow, hydrogenated
   glyceride, petroleum waxes, and combinations
   that   produce  either   saponifiable   or
   nonsaponifiable   materials  in  addition  to
   abrasive materials.

 * Miscellaneous surface  contaminants  such as
   lapping  compounds,  residue  from  magnetic
   particle inspection, hand oils,  shop din, chips,
   airborne  dust, finger grease, ink marks, barrier
   cream, or hand protective cream and  metal
   pieces also exist.

 Once the soils are identified, their sources should
 be determined. Soils are often
**  received as raw material

»  received with vendor parts

*  produced in forming/stamping operations

*  produced in general machining operations

*  produced in sub-assembly

The handling,  packaging, and routing  of parts
through  the production   process  should  be
reassessed to minimize the number of times a part
is soiled and cleaned.  If several similar cleaning
operations  exist throughout the plant, the team
may choose to  consolidate some of them into a
central location.  This could also allow for more
efficient use of the cleaning materials and facilities
and improved control of waste and emissions.

Segregation and precleaning of parts can extend
bath  life  and  make cleaning  more efficient.
Heavily soiled parts should  be routed separately
through  a  single  precleaning  system,  thereby
concentrating soils in one cleaning process.


Characterize the Substrate

When studies are conducted regarding alternative
cleaning methods, it  is critical that the team  is
familiar with the substrates being* cleaned in each
operation.   Often, cleaning processes  that are
effective on  one substrate  cannot be  used on
another  substrate, even  if the soil is identical.
Questions that the team should consider include:
      • What  material/substrate   is  being
        cleaned?

      « What   degree  of   cleanliness   is
        required?
                           ?
      • What is the surface finish required?

      • What coatings are on the surface?
As the team learns more about the substrates that
are being cleaned,  it will become aware  of the

-------
                                                                                                 23
        What coatings are on the surface?

        What  is  the  size.  and  geometric
        configuration of the  part?   Is there
        solvent   entrapment  potential
        associated with the part? How rough
        is the surface of the part?

        To what level of assembly has the part
        been dismantled?
properties that.it must look for and the choices
that it will  be limited to in choosing  a new
cleaning chemical or process.
                                   (
As mentioned earlier,  precision components that
are made of beryllium are chemically reactive,
especially with ionic chlorine. Care must be taken
to select an alternative that is compatible with the
substrate.

Metals such  as aluminum and alloys containing
magnesium,  lithium,  and  zinc  require  special
consideration because of their sensitivity to attack
by certain chemicals.  For example, cleaners for
aluminum  and   zinc   are  mildly  alkaline
(approximately 9-10 pH) or contain inhibitors such
as silicate to  prevent alkaline attack on these soft
metals, while those for magnesium and steel are
best used above 11 pH.  Zinc and cadmium are
subject to  corrosion  and  pitting  by alkaline
solutions.
overlapping joints, and parts with blind holes and
tubing can retain cleaning solution,  which may
cause corrosion. Care must be taken to thoroughly
dry these parts after cleaning.

Special care is also required during cleaning prior
to  nondestructive testing procedures  such  as
penetrant inspection.   In order to conduct  an
accurate penetrant inspection  test, the  product
surface must be completely free of residual surface
contamination. The presence of cleaner residue or
other  contaminants  may shield  flaws  in  the
structure and prevent  the inspection fluid from
penetrating surface flaws or  cracks.  Therefore,
care must be exercised to ensure that the cleaning
method employed results in  a sufficiently clean
surface prior to inspection.
Another material that requires special attention is
titanium (and its alloys).  It can be  sensitive to
attack (e.g., stress corrosion cracking) by residual
chlorinated and fluorinated solvents, particularly if
subjected to processes at temperatures greater than
662°F (350°C),  Therefore, the team should be
familiar with the parts that contain this metal.

Composite materials, which are used in aircraft
and other products that require high strength and
stiffness  and  low density, also warrant  special
attention.    Examples  of > composite  materials
include   Kevlar,   graphite/epoxy,   and
Kevlar/graphite.

Parts with  excessive porosity,  parts  that  have
severely rough surfaces, parts that have permanent

-------
24

-------
                                                                                      25
 METHODOLOGY FOR  SELECTING  AN
 ALTERNATIVE  CLEANING PROCESS
 In developing and selecting an alternative chemical
 or process for precision cleaning, several criteria
 should be  considered.  These criteria can be
 broadly grouped into the following categories:
       Organizational

       Policy and Regulatory

       Technical

       Economic

       Environmental, Health, and Safety
 Organizational
 The  most  important  aspect of  a corporate
 phaseout of ozone-depleting substances (ODSs) is
 the commitment of the corporate management to
 such  a program. Without such a commitment, a
 facility would  be hard-pressed  to successfully
 complete its phaseout.  Important considerations
 which pertain  to the  corporate  organization
 include:

 * Compatibility   with  other  corporate   goals.
   Corporate policy may not  allow the  use of
   particular solvents if the company is sensitive to
   public opinion.  This would result from a
   corporate policy in which the  opinions of the
•'  general public  are to be  considered in all
   decision-making.

 * Compatibility with corporate environmental policy.
   Some  alternatives genefate other forms of
   emissions, effluents, or wastes that are also the
   subject of corporate environmental goals.
  Feasibility given existing organizational structure.
  Environmental concerns may already  be  the
  responsibility of a particular task'force within
  the company. Some companies have made
  environmental performance a  criterion  for
  evaluating managerial performance.

  Willingness to provide  capital.    Corporate
  management  must be willing to make capital
  investments in mew equipment in order to
  facilitate a phaseout of ODSs.  They should
  understand that a capital outlay at the .present
  time may result in significant cost savings in
  future years.
Policy and Regulatory

Any potential alternative chemical or process must
be examined for compliance with a variety of
government regulations and laws.  At the very
least, alternatives must comply with the mandates
of the 1987 Montreal Protocol on Substances that
Deplete  the  Ozone Layer  and its subsequent
amendments  and adjustments.    In  addition,
alternatives  must   meet   federal  and  local
regulations that apply in the country where the
alternative is to be implemented.  In the United
States for example, alternatives must comply with
the sections pertaining to  stratospheric ozone
protection in the Clean Air  Act Amendments of
1990.   These include  Section 608:   National
Emissions  Reduction  Program,  Section  611:
Labeling, and Section  612:   Safe Alternatives
Policy.    Alternatives  must also  follow  strict
regulations  on emissions  of-, volatile  organic
compounds (VOCs) in some metropolitan areas.
Technical

The technical feasibility of an alternative process is
dependent  on   a   number   of   important
considerations.  While these considerations will

-------
  26
  vary from facility to facility depending on location
  and function, a number of these considerations are
  universal in their applicability. Important criteria
  to consider when evaluating an alternative cleaning
  process for its technical adequacy include the
  following:
     *   Cleaning ability

     *   Compliance to specifications

     *   Material compatibility

    ••   Effect on subsequent processes

     «   Process control

     •   Throughput of the cleaning process

     •   Ease of new process installation

     «   Floor space requirements

     *   Operating and maintenance require-
         ments.
  Cleaning Ability

  The degree of cleanliness required when cleaning
  a part varies from industry to industry and from
  process to process.  In general, precision cleaning
  is performed when cleanliness requirements are
  fairly stringent and/or component materials are
  sensitive.

  The successful removal  of contamination  from a
  surface is not a property of the solvent alone, but
  a combined  relationship 'of the cleaner,  the
  substrate,  the soils, and the cleaning conditions.
'" Characteristics  of the  cleaner  or solvent that
  greatly affect its cleaning ability include wetting,
  capillary   action,   detergency,  solubility,  and
  emulsification.
                           s
  Several standard tests can be used to determine the
  cleaning  ability of an  alternative chemical  or
  process.  Some of these tests  can be run on the
  shop floor (visuals, tissue paper test, water break, •
and acid copper test), whereas other tests would
have to be performed in a laboratory.

*  Visual Inspection.   These tests are  conducted
   under high-intensity  or long-wave  ultraviolet
   lamps primarily on  large production  parts,
   rather than test coupons. Examination reveals
  •water-spotting,  streaking or haze that  might
   indicate insufficient rinsing.

*  Electron or Optical Microscopy.  These tests can
   be conducted with  test coupons or production
   parts to examine contamination residues, obtain
   photographic  documentation,  and*  observe
   crystal  properties.    When  using electron
   microscopy, particular care must  be taken to
   prevent  the  test  coupon  from  introducing
   external contamination.

•  Microchemistry.   This  method  characterizes
   microscopic  residues  on   surfaces.     This
   technique involves dissolving the residue with a
   drop of liquid,  transferring the drop (and the
   dissolved contamination) to a microscopic slide,
   and performing the chemical analysis under a
   microscope.    The most  common residues
   analyzed are the crystal precipitates that form as
   a  result  of  the  reactions  between  specific
   contaminants and reagents.

•  X-Ray   Photoelectron   Spectroscopy  (XPS)  or
   Electron Spectroscopy  for  Chemical Analysis
   (ESCA).  XPS is a surface analysis technique
   that is particularly useful for identifying thin
   films on surfaces.  The system can examine an
   area of one millimeter or more in diameter or,
   with small-spot  ESCA, can be focused to a fine
   spot micrometers in  diameter.   Other useful
   chemical  analysis  techniques  include  Auger
   electron spectroscopy  (AES), secondary ion
   mass spectroscopy (SIMS), and  microscopic
   Fourier-Transform infrared spectroscopy (micro.
   FT-IR).
                            *t
•  Tissue Paper Test. The cleaned surface is rubbed
   with  white  tissue paper and  the  tissue  is
  " observed for discoloration.  This test is simple
   and can be done in  the production/plant
   environment.

•  Water  Break.  If the last clean rinse forms a
   continuous water  film  on the part as  it  is
   removed, the surface can be considered clean.

-------
                                                                                               27
Acid Copper Test. A ferrous panel is immersed
in a copper sulfate solution.  On clean surface
areas,  copper will be deposited by chemical
activity, forming a strong adherent, semi-bright
coating that is spot free.

Residue Level, The test panel is rinsed with an
appropriate solvent after cleaning. The solvent
is then evaporated  and the residue analyzed
quantitatively and qualitatively using analytical
instrumentation (EDS, SEM, JR, etc).

Atomizer Test. Water mist is  applied to a clean
dry surface with an atomizer.  The cleanliness is
determined by  the value  of  the  advancing
contact angle.

Contact Angle of Water Drop. A drop of water is
placed on the test surface; the contact angle is
then measured either photographically or by a
contact angle goniometer.  Although this is an
accurate method of determining relative surface
cleanliness, it can only be used under laboratory
conditions.   In addition,  the  presence of a
surfactant on the test  surface may result in a
false reading.

Kerosene Viewing of Water Break.  The test panel
is withdrawn  from water  and is immediately
submerged  in  -a  transparent   container  of
kerosene that is lighted  from the  bottom.
Water  breaks  are displaced  by  kerosene.
(Because kerosene is combustible, care must be
taken when using thr method.)

Radioactive  Tracer.    A  radioactive  soiling
compound is applied to the test piece, and the
residual radioactivity is measured after cleaning.
This is the most sensitive of the quantitative
tests  now  available.   Standard precautions
should be taken when working with radioactive
materials.

Elemental  Analysis.     A   surface   carbon
determination  is  one  of  the  most accurate
methods of identifying small amounts of organic
residues such  as  oils  remaining  after  the
cleaning of metal parts. A test part is placed in
an electric resistance furnace and carbon'dioxide
is introduced at 958°F  (500°C).  Measurements
are  taken  using  a  non-dispersive  infrared
analyzer (wave length  =  4240 nm).   The
sensitivity of this method is 0.01 mg/nr and the
  accuracy is 0.5 percent carbon content.

  Fluorescent Dye.  An oil soluble fluorescent dye
  is mixed with  an oily soiling -013161131  and
  applied to the test panels. After the panels are
  cleaned,  the  retained  soil  is  visible  under
  ultraviolet or black light.   Note that some
  .cleaners  may  selectively remove  tracer  or
  fluorescent dyes.

  Gravimetric. The test panels are weighed before
  and after cleaning.   The  sensitivity  of the
  method  depends upon the sensitivity of the
  balance and the size of the panel.

  Oil Spot.  A drop of solvent is used to degrease
  an area the size of the drop.  The drop is picked *
  up with a pipette  and evaporated on  ground
  glass.      An   evaporation  ring   indicates
  contamination.

  Paniculate Contamination.   A thin  film  of
  polyvinyl chloride  is pressed against  the  test
  surface, heated to 240°F (115°C), and cooled. It
  is then carefully stripped  from the surface and
  examined  under  the   microscope.     The
  paniculate contaminants  will be embedded in
  the vinyl sheet.

  Panicle Removal Test.  Particle removal can be
  tested by artificially contaminating surfaces with
  known particles of various sizes down to  and
  below the size of interest for removal. Precision
  particles from submicron  to tens of microns in
  size can be obtained.  Nephelometric methods
  and membrane  filtration  methods such  as
  ASTM-F24 are  useful low-cost techniques for
  evaluating general cleaning.
Compliance to Specifications

Many precision cleaning applications are subject to
military or other  specifications.  Standards  and
specifications  often complicate  the  search  for
alternative chemicals or processes by requiring the
use of a specific cleaner or solvent for a specific
cleaning application.   In such  instances, it is
necessary to negotiate existing specifications before
switching to alternative technologies.

-------
 28
 Material Compatibility

 In the selection of an alternative process, material
 compatibility is as* important as the cleaning ability
 of 'the cleaner itself.  Issues to be considered
 include: the possibility for corrosion or chemical
 attack of metals, plastics, composites, and other
 sensitive  materials;  swelling  or  deformation  of
 elastomers; and damage to coatings or adhesives
 present on the surface.

 Compatibility can be evaluated by  performing a
 number of tests including:

 * Intergranular attack  testing determines if the
   cleaning solution unacceptably weakens the test
   metal by selectively  removing material along
   grain boundaries.

 • Stress corrosion cracking (SCC)  (ASTM-G38)
   of parts  can occur when susceptible  materials
   (from which the parts are made)  are corrosion
   sensitized during cleaning and are subsequently
   •aged in a tension stress application, possibly
   with variations in temperature. In general SCC'
   tests are run by subjecting a test specimen of
   the same composition and heat treatment as the
   part to a constant tension stress load after being
   exposed to the corrosive medium.  A number of
   ASTM  test  methods  specify complete test
   details for specimen configuration and stress
   loading.    See  TM-01-69  MACE  standard
   "Laboratory Corrosion Testing of Metals for the
   Process Industry."

 • Total immersion corrosion (ASTM 483) testing
   evaluates  the general  corrosive  attack  of  a
   cleaner  which   can   cause   unacceptable
   dimensional changes in a  metal surface:  A
   number of specifications describe variations on
   this test  (MIL-C-87936, ASTM F483).   Metal
   cleaners for aluminum and aluminum alloys can
   be evaluated in accordance with  ASTM D930.
i  Cleaners for all other metals can be evaluated
   using ASTM D1280.  For example, the test can
   be conducted by completely immersing  a tared
   specimen into the test solution so that there is
   •no  air/solution interface?   The  specimen is
   allowed to sit undisturbed for 24 hours after
   which  it is  removed,  rinsed,  dried,  and
   reweighed,.  Corrosion is measured as weight
   loss or gain.  The amount of allowable loss
   should be predetermined depending on the kind
   of material and use, but should be restricted to
   a few milligrams.

   Sandwich corrosion  (ASTM  F1110)  testing
   measures the corrosivity of a cleaner confined
   between  fraying  surfaces  and  periodically
   exposed to specified temperature and humidity
   conditions.

   Hydrogen , embrittlement  (ASTM  F519-77)
   testing is conducted to determine if cleaners will
   adversely affect high strength steel. Testing can
   be conducted in accordance with ASTM F519,
   using both cadmium plated! and unplated Type
   1A  steel specimens.    The  specimens are
   subjected to 45 percent of their ultimate tensile
   strength while  immersed in  the test solution.
   The specimens must not break for a minimum
   of 150 hours.

   Accelerated  testing  involves   the   use   of
   temperature, humidity, and chemical accelerants
   in environmental test chambers.  Optical and
   electron   microscopy,  Auger   electron
   spectroscopy' (AES),  and ESCA are  useful
   analytical tools.
Effect on Subsequent Processes

Since cleaning is an integral part of manufacturing
processes,  it  is  critical  to  examine cleaning
effectiveness  and* the  effect of  cleaners  on
subsequent manufacturing steps. Process steps that
may follow precision cleaning include:
                                        1
* Inspection.   Inspections may be  numerous,
  making speed and ease of handling of parts very
  important. Parts are cleaned to meet customer
  requirements and must be inspected to identify
  any defects.

* Assembly.  Assembly requires that parts be free
  from inorganic and organic contaminants. The
  cleaning process' should  leave the parts clean
  and  dry, ready  for assembly and/or subsequent
  finishing*.

« Packaging.  Final cleaning prepares parts for
  packing and shipping.  Precision cleaning may
  not  make sense if packaging contaminates the
  parts.

-------
                                                                                                 29
 *  Application of Protective Coatings.  Cleaning is
    used extensively before and after the application
    of protective and/or decorative finishes.  For
    example, surfaces  cleaned  before  painting,
    enameling, or lacquering, give better adhesion
    of finishes.   Similarly, cleaning is used  to
    remove  large amounts of oil contamination,
    prior  to electroplating  and  passivation  of
    ferrous metal alloys, and anodizing and chemical
    conversion coating of aluminum.

 •  Further Metal Working or Treatment.  In many
    instances,   parts   must  be  prepared   for
    subsequent  operations such as welding,  heat
    treating,  or  further  machining.    Cleaning
    between steps allows the operator to start each
    new step with clean,  dry parts.  Before  heat
    treatment, all traces of processing oils should be
    removed from the surfaces, since their presence
    causes  smoking,  nonuniform hardening, and
    heat treatment discoloration on certain metals.
    Residual contaminants remaining on a surface
    during heat treatment can cause intergranular
    attack, which leads to stress corrosion or loss of
    fatigue strength.

 Potential residues remaining after cleaning with an
 alternative product or process must be evaluated
 for their compatibility with subsequent processes.
 This is especially important in cleaning prior to
 nondestructive testing (NDT) inspection.
 Process Conlro/

 Process control is  part of a quality  assurance
 program.  Precision  cleaning operations must be
 controlled  to  maintain the  required  level of
 cleanliness.  One example of good process control
 is checking cleaner solution concentration on a
 routine basis.    Maintaining  proper  solution
 concentration by making small, frequent additions
 is much more effective than making a few large
/additions.    The  proper  automated   chemical
 dispensing equipment, which can be activated by a
 timer or by conductivity of the solution, is a good
 method for control.
Throughput of the Cleaning Process

Cleaning process throughput can be an important
parameter, especially  if cleaning is  part  of a
continuous production process.  Some alternative
cleaning processes may have slower throughput
due  to  optimized operations and special drying
stages.  For example, if a plant switches from a
solvent  cleaning to aqueous cleaning process, it
must allow more time for drying.  This added
drying time reduces ithe throughput of the cleaning,
and  possibly  manufacturing, process.  If enough
time  is not  given  to  dry parts,  subsequent
operations can be adversely affected.  For batch
cleaning processes, throughput may not be critical.
Ease of New Process Installation

The ease with which a solvent cleaning process
using CFC-113 or MCF can  be converted to or
replaced by an alternative cleaning process will
have a direct bearing on the choice of alternative.
Issues associated with the  installation of the new
process include facility preparation,  production/
service   downtime,  user  awareness/education,
qualification testing, and  transition between the
two processes.   In some-cases, the  addition of
wastewater treatment facilities may be necessary.
Floor Space Requirements

Equipment must be compatible with the plan and
space constraints of the facility's manufacturing
floor.  A new process might  require rearranging
subsequent processes to optimize the floor plan.
In some cases, alternatives take up more space
than solvent cleaning processes.   For example,
compared  to  a  single vapor degreaser,  most
aqueous cleaning processes include a minimum of
two wash/rinse tanks and a drying  device.   The
result often is an increase in the amount of floor
space required.   However,  some cabinet  spray
washers are designed to wash, rinse, and dry in the
same  cabinet, thereby  minimizing the need  for
multiple tanks. Rearranging existing equipment or
installing a new process also may trigger additional
permitting requirements.

-------
30
Operating and Maintenance
Requirements

Each new process may require a modification of
cleaning procedures.  In these cases, not only will.
there be the need to develop and test the new
procedures, but special operator training may be
needed  to familiarize operators with the proper
techniques for use with new cleaning technologies.

Due to the fact that process parameters are'likely
to require more close control when substituting an
alternative   process,  maintenance  of  process
equipment  on a regular basis  is critical.   For
example, cleaning of spray nozzles is necessary to
remove soil contamination, and pumps and valves
should be checked regularly.

In some alternative processes, as the concentration
of soils in the cleaning solution increases, parts
may leave the cleaning solution with unacceptable
amounts of residual soil. Therefore, plants should
consider 'monitoring  solutions regularly,  using
filtration, and having a post-rinse/wash step. f ,
Economic

Process economics is a key factor in the selection
of alternative processes.  Initial costs associated
with an alternative process include capital costs of
equipment, possible  costs associated-with waste,
treatment/handling equipment and costs for permit •
changes for new construction  or new operating
procedures.  In addition, operating cost equations
include material, labor,  maintenance, and  utility
costs. Cost estimates for an alternative process can
be developed through preliminary process design.

One simple approach is to calculate net present
value (NPV) based on the discount rate and period
of investment your company uses.  The NPV is
calculated as follows, where (n) is the number of
years, and (i) is the discount rate.
   NPV m Cost^ + Costj/Cl-t-i) 4-

     CosV(H-i)2 + ...
While traditional economic considerations such as
rate of return and payback period are important,
the CFC-113 and MCF reduction program can be
justified on a basis of environmental protection
and solvent supply reliability.  It is important to
recognize that the price of CFC-113 and MCF will
continue to rise rapidly as the supplies are reduced
and higher taxes are  imposed.  Because of the
considerable   difference    in   ozone-depleting
potential, the price increases of CFCtllS and MCF
will vary. The cost savings resulting from savings
in solvent consumption should be included  in all
cost calculations.    Many of  the  alternative
processes can be much less expensive than the
current CFC-113 and MCF, processes being used.
Environmental, Health, and
Safety

Important environment, health, and safety issues to
consider when evaluating an alternative cleaning
process include:

*  Compatibility with appropriate federal, state, and
   local regulations.  State and local regulations on
   ozone-depleting  chemicals, VOCs, effluents of
   waste can be more stringent than their federal
   counterparts.   For example,  in  the  United
   States, some cities have taken steps to phase out
   ozone-depleting   compounds   (ODCs)   more
   quickly than the U.S. Clean Air Act requires.
   Other areas have strict laws regulating the use
   of VOCs.    In addition  to the phaseout
   requirements under the Clean Air Act, there are
   a number of provisions in effect that will also
  •impact the selection  of alternatives.   These
   provisions  include Section  608;   National
   Emissions Reduction  Program, Section  610:
'   Nonessential   Products  Containing
   Chlorofluorocarbons, Section 611:  Labeling,
   and Section 612: Significant New Alternatives
   Policy,  , These and other provisions must be
   considered  before selecting alternatives.  In
   Europe, "Best Available Technology (BAT)"
   guidelines have  been  developed in order to
   control VOC  emissions from solvent cleaning
   processes.      These   guidelines  outline
   recommended equipment design and operating
   practices for  use  in  cold  cleaning,  vapor
   degreasing, and  "in-line"  cleaning..    The
   guidelines also address treatment and disposal

-------
                                                                                              31
of  waste  materials  from  solvent  cleaning
operations.    This includes not  only  spent
solvent, |>ut contaminants such as solids and oils
as well.

Compatibility with regulatory  trends.  Since new
environmental policy is emphasizing pollution
prevention and risk reduction, it is prudent to
move to cleaner products and processes that are
less polluting, less energy-intensive, less toxic,
and less dependent on raw materials.

Public perceptions.  Legislation such as "right-to-
know" laws,has provided the public with more
information about the chemicals used by specific
plants  and  their associated  risks.    Public
information has made plants more accountable
to the concerns of neighboring communities.

Potential of alternatives to contribute  to ozone
depletion and global vanning.   Each potential
alternative   must   be   evaluated   for  its
contribution  to ozone depletion as well  as
global warming.   In most cases, it will be
considered unacceptable to replace a high ozone
depletor with a nonozone-depleting substance
that  has a  high global warming potential
(GWP).  The focus  during the phaseout  of
ozone-depleting substances should be on rinding
substitutes that do not contribute significantly
to  other environmental problems. The U.S.
EPA is evaluating the ozone-depleting potential
(ODP) and GWP of alternatives as a part of its
overall risk characterization under Sectiort./»12
of the Clean Air Act.

Energy efficiency.   As energy costs rise,  it is
important to consider the energy requirements
of each alternative. The energy efficiency of an
alternative cleaning process will  have direct
impacts  on both  the cost  of maintaining a
process as well as on the environment via global
warming concerns.   Energy issues are being
evaluated by the U.S. EPA as part of the  overall
risk characterization under Section 612 of the
Clean Air Act.                             ,

Effects  on  emissions,  effluents,   and  wastes
generated. Every alternative has different effects
on  water, air,  and  land  pollution.    It  is
preferable to eliminate environmental problems,
rather than to transfer them from one medium
to  another.  The phaseout of CFC-113 and
' MCF in cleaning operations will  reduce or
 eliminate the need to dispose of spent solvent.
 However, processes such as aqueous cleaning,
 which are sometimes used in precision cleaning,
 will create large  amounts  of wastewater  that
 may have to be treated before being discharged
 to a POTW.   The  emissions, effluents,  and
 waste streams of alternatives are being evaluated
 as part of the overall risk characterization  that
 the U.S. EPA is conducting for Section 612 of
 the Clean Air Act..

 VOC concerns. Limitations on VOC emissions
 may influence the selection of an alternative. In
 many  areas,   switching   solvents  requires
 repermitting and the adoption of more stringent
 controls. In the U.S., for example, certain states
 have legislation that restricts the use of solvents
 that are VOCs.  Some states also ban the use of
 certain substances (e.g., methylene chloride in
 New Jersey) because of possible  toxic health
 effects.  Application-specific exemptions  and
 containment criteria may  also exist, so VOC
 regulatory  provisions  should be   researched
 thoroughly.  The air toxics provisions of the
 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments  target  189
 toxic air pollutants.   Of these, 149 are organic
 compounds.

 Toxicity and Worker Safety.  Alternatives should
 minimize occupational  exposure to  hazardous
 chemicals where possible. Exposure  limits such
 as those determined by the Occupational Safety
 and Health Administration (OSHA)  in the U.S.
 should   be   considered   before   selecting
 alternatives.   The  American Conference of
 Governmental and  Industrial  Hygienists also
 provides threshold  limit  values  (TLVs)  for
 different  chemicals.    Personal   protective
 equipment  such as  gloves, safety  glasses,  and
 shop aprons  can  be used to increase' worker
 safety.  Work procedures and practices should
 be reviewed and modified to accommodate the
 properties  of  the  alternative cleaner.    A
 lexicologist should  also be consulted if  the
 cleaner or cleaning process is new to the facility.
 As  part  of the  implementation  strategy for
 Section 612 of the Clean Air Act Amendments,
 the U.S. EPA  has  initiated  discussions with
 NIOSH, OSHA, and other governmental  and
 nongovernmental  associations  to   develop  a
 consensus process for establishing occupational

-------
32
   exposure* limits  for  the  most  significant
   substitute chemicals.

   Flammability.  Fire and explosion hazards are
   very  important  considerations.    In  some
   instances, changes in a material or process will
   require the review, of fire protection engineers
   and insurance carriers.  Flammability should be
   evaluated and adequate-fire control measures
   implemented  before switching to a  cleaning
   process which involves potentially  flammable
   substances. Flammability is being evaluated as
   part of the overall risk characterization that is
   being conducted by the U.S. EPA under Section
   612 of the Clean Air Act

-------
                                                                                33
REVIEW OF  THE PROGRAM
The following sequence of activities should be performed to develop a maintenance cleaning
program that eliminates the use of CFC-113 and MCF in precision cleaning:
   •   Determine where and why CFC-113 and methyl chloroform are consumed in
      precision cleaning operations;

   •   Characterize existing cleaning processes.  This activity will help  reveal how
      precision cleaning integrates with other manufacturing processes and determine
      whether cleaning is necessary;

   *   Characterize  current  solvent  material,  process control  methods, operating
      procedures, and disposal practices, and  determine the sources of  any solvent
      losses.  This step will help identify "housekeeping" measures to reduce solvent
      consumption at little or no net cost to the facility;               ,
                                          i
   •   Characterize the substrate materials being cleaned. This step includes identifying
      the type and geometry of materials being cleaned;
             ~%
   «   Characterize the soils and their sources; and

   •   Establish criteria that must be considered before selecting an alternative cleaning
      process.  These criteria include organizational, policy, technical, economic,
   ,   environmental, health, and safety issues.
These steps will provide a plant with a better understanding of its cleaning needs, allow for
the elimination and/or consolidation of certain cleaning operations, and develop a systematic -
procedure for selecting an alternative cleaning process. With this understanding, the next
section describes some major alternative processes to solvent cleaning using CFC-113 and
methyl chloroform.                        |

-------
34

-------
                                                                                    35
ALTERNATIVES   TO   CFC-113   AIMD    METHYL
CHLOROFORM
A number of alternative cleaning processes and
alternative solvents to eliminate CFC-113 and
MCF are now available lor precision cleaning
operations. The choice of an alternative depends
on a variety of factors, including the cleanliness
required and economic, technical, health, safety,
and environmental issues.

It may also be possible to reduce and/or eliminate
deposition'of soils which require cleaning, allowing
the  use of  a less  aggressive cleaning method.
Therefore, the  conversion to  an alternative
cleaning  process  may be made  simpler  by
evaluating the ability to reduce contamination.

The  following  sections   describe  the  major
advantages, disadvantages, and key process details
associated with the most promising alternatives.

Provision of this material in no way constitutes
EPA or ICOLP recommendation or approval of
any  company or  specific  offering.    These
technologies should be evaluated on a case-by-case
basis. A list of vendors and references at the end
of this manual may be a useful additional source of
information.   The  following  alternatives are
addressed in this manual:
% "Good Housekeeping" Practices

 Alternative Cleaning Processes:

 *  Aqueous

 •  Semi-Aqueous

 «  Pressurized Gases

 *  Supercritical Fluids

 •  Gas Plasma Cleaning

 «  Ultraviolet/Ozone

 •  CO2Snow

 Alternative Solvents:

 *  Aliphatic Hydrocarbons

 «  Perfluorocarbons

 «  Alcohol Cleaning with
    Perfluorocarbon

 •  Hydrochloroiluorocarbons

 «  N-Methyl-2-Pyrrolidone

 •  Other Organic Solvents

 •  Other Chlorinated Solvents
                        i
 «  Volatile Methyl Siloxanes

-------
36

-------
                                                                                             37
 "GOOD  HOUSEKEEPING"  PRACTICES
 As  previously mentioned, one  of  the  primary
 components of a successful phaseout strategy is the
 identification of  uses  of  the  solvent  to be
 eliminated. An accurate picture  of solvent usage
 will allow the phaseout team to focus its efforts on
 those areas where large quantities of solvent are
 used and where alternatives are readily available.
 This solvent use characterization  can also be used
 to decrease consumption' immediately through the
 classification  of  uses  as  either legitimate and
 improper uses.

 Many of the precision cleaning applications in
 which CFC-113 and MCF are  being used are
 neither necessary nor intended uses. When these
 substances were introduced to plants years ago,
 they  were intended for  specific  applications.
 However, their excellent cleaning ability, coupled
 with  the  availability  of  these  solvents, often
 resulted in their extensive  use.

 One method of  significantly reducing a plant's
 usage of CFC-113,  and especially MCF, is the
 implementation of "good housekeeping" measures.
 These measures should be  designed to limit use of
 these substances to applications for which they are
 intended, and to eliminate  their  use in other
 convenience applications.   The first step in this
 "good housekeeping" procedure is to identify all
 uses of the solvents.

 Use of CFC-113 and MCF should be evaluated
 using surveys, shop inspections, and whatever
 additional means are necessary. The resulting data
 should be cataloged so that it can be compared
 with future data.  Computerizing the cataloging
 system may make tracking  usage patterns easier in
- the long run.

 Once the survey of current uses is completed, the
 solvent substitution team should  evaluate each of
 the uses to determine whether or not the solvent
 being  used  was intended   for  use  in  that
 application.  In cases where it is  decided that the
 solvent was not meant to be used  in a "specific
 application,  this  usage  should  be  eliminated
 immediately and  replaced with the originally
intended   solvent   or  cleaning   process.
Investigations should also be conducted to learn
how CFC-113 or MCF came to be used for the
unintended application.    The results  of this
investigation should help to preve'nt, the same
problem from occurring in other applications or
with other chemicals.

After  the  cataloging  system   is  in  place,
arrangements can be made to monitor and log all
future purchases and dispersements of CFC-113,
MCF, and all other solvents. Several players in the
airline industry, using  an approach such as this,
have had substantial success  in controlling their
consumption not only of ozone-depleting solvents,
but of other solvents as well, thereby experiencing
significant cost  savings.   One major  airline in
Europe has reported a  reduction in CFC-113 and
MCF usage of more than 50 percent through "good
housekeeping" measures alone.

-------
38

-------
AQUEOUS CLEANING
                                                                                              39
Aqueous cleaners use water as the primary solvent.
They often incorporate surfactants and builders
with special additives such as pH buffers, corrosion
inhibitors,   chelates,   saponifiers,   emulsifiers,
deflocculants,  complexing agents,  antifoaming
agents, and other materials. These ingredients can
be  formulated,  blended,  and  concentrated  in
varying degrees to accommodate the user's cleaning
needs.  Exhibit  6 presents  an overview  of the
advantages and disadvantages of aqueous cleaning.
Process Chemistry

Aqueous cleaners are made up'of three basic
components:  (1)  the builders which make up the
largest portion of the cleaner and create stable soil
emulsions once soils are removed from a surface,
(2) the organic and  inorganic additives which
promote cleaning and cleaner stability, and (3) the
surfactants and wetting agents which are the key
constituents and  remove or displace soils from
surfaces and initiate the emulsification process. As
noted  earlier, being able to tailor the cleaner
formulation gives aqueous cleaning great flexibility.
Molecular structure, which has significant effects
on the properties, can be varied over a wide range.
For  example, the  number  of  carbons on  the
molecule (whether straight chain, branched chain,
or ring structure) and the ratio of the hydrophilic
to hydrophobic moiety can be tailored to achieve
the desired cleaning requirements.

Builders are the alkaline salts in aqueous cleaners.
They are  usually  a  blend  selected  from  the
following  groups:  alkali metal  orthophosphates,
pyrophosphates, and condensed phosphates, alkali
metal   hydroxides,   silicates,   carbonates,
bicarbonates, and borates. A blend of two or more
builders is typically used in aqueous cleaners..

Although phosphates are the best overall builders,
discharge   of  cleaning   solutions  containing
phosphates  is  often  subject to  environmental
regulations, thereby limiting their use.  Chelating
agents such as the sodium salt of ethylenediamine
 tetra acetic acid (EDTA), the trisodium salt of
-nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA), and gluconates used
 with other builders can be employed instead of
 phosphates.  Silicates are sometimes difficult to
 rinse and may cause trouble in subsequent plating
 and painting operations if not completely removed.
 They may also cause fouling in process equipment
 such as filters and pumps. Hydroxides are effective
 on difficult soils. They saponify effectively because
 of their high pH.  Carbonates are an inexpensive
 alkaline source but less effective than phosphates.

 Additives   are  either   organic  or   inorganic
 compounds that provide additional  cleaning or
 surface modifications.   Glycols, glycol ethers,
 chelating agents, and polyvalent metal salts are
 common additives.

 Surfactants are organic  compounds  that provide
 detergency, emulsification, and wetting in alkaline
 cleaners.  Surfactants are unique because of their
 characteristic chemical structure.  They have two
 distinct structural components attached together as
 a single molecule. A hydrophobic half has little
 attraction for the solvent (water) and is insoluble.
 The other half is hydrophilic and is polar, having
 a strong attraction for the solvent (water) which
. carries the molecule into solution. Their unique
 chemical structure provides high affinity for surface
 adsorption. Surfactants are classified as anionic,
 cationic, nonionic, and zwitterionic (amphoteric).
 Surfactants most  useful in metal  cleaning are
 anionic and  nonionic.   The  use of surfactants
 reduces the surface tension of water, allowing the
 water to penetrate into tightly spaced areas where
 it could not otherwise reach.

 The  use  of a nonfoaming  cleaner  is  extremely
 important  in  alkaline  cleaning  applications
 performed using a spray technique,

 Nonionic surfactant is generally the only type of
 surfactant that results in minimum  foaming and
 provides good detergency.  Therefore, it is often
 used in spray applications. All types of surfactants
 can be used  for  immersion  cleaning, although
 cationic surfactants are rarely used.

-------
40
                                                   Exhibit 6
                                      AQUEOUS CLEANING
    ADVANTAGES

    Aqueous cleaning has several advantages over organic
    solvent cleaning.

    *   Safety —Aqueous systems have fewer worker safety
        problems compared to many solvents. They are not
        flammable or explosive.  Consult material  safety
        data sheets for information on health and safety.

   * *   Q caning — Aqueous systems can be designed to
        dean panicles and films better than solvents.

    *   Flexibility —  Aqueous systems  have multiple
        degrecs-of-freedom in process design, formulation
        and concentration.  This freedom helps aqueous
        cleaning provide superior cleaning  for a  wider
        variety of contamination.

    •   Removal of Inorganic or Polar Soils — Aqueous
        cleaning is particularly good for cleaning inorganic
        or polar materials.  Many machine shops are using
        water-based lubricants and coolants to replace oil-
        based  lubricants  for  environmental and  other
        reasons. Water-based lubricants are well suited to
        aqueous cleaning processes.

    *  .Oil and Grease Removal - Organic films, oils, and
        greases can  be effectively  removed by aqueous
        chemistry.

    •   Multiple Cleaning Mechanism — Aqueous cleaning
        functions by several mechanisms rather than just
        dissolution. These include saponification (chemical
        reaction), displacement, emulsification, dispersion,
        and others.   Panicles are effectively removed by
        surface activity coupled with the application of
        mechanical energy.

    *   Ultrasonics Applicability — Ultrasonics are much
        more effective in water-based solvents than in CFC-
        113 or MCF solvents.   "

    *   Material and Waste Disposal Cost — Aqueous
     .   cleaning solutions are generally less expensive than
        solvents and, when properly handled, will reduce
        waste disposal costs.
 DISADVANTAGES

 Depending upon the specific cleaning applicatiqn there are
 also disadvantages.

 *  Cleaning  Difficulty — Parts  with  blind  holes,  small
    crevices, and tubing may be difficult to clean and/or dry,
    and may require process optimization.

• *  Process Control — Solvent cleaning is  a very forgiving
    process.   To  be effective, aqueous processes require
    careful engineering and control.

 *  Rinsing -- Some aqueous cleaner residues, particularly
    from surfactants, can be difficult to nnse. Trace residues
    may be detrimental for some applications and materials.
    Special caution  should  be taken for  parts  requiting
    subsequent vacuum deposition, liquid oxygen contact, etc.
    Rinsing can be improved using DI water or alcohol nnse.

 •  Drying — It  may  be  difficult  to dry  certain  part
    geometries with crevices  and  blind  holes.   Drying
    equipment is often required.

 *  Floor  Space —  In  some  instances aqueous cleaning
    equipment may require more floor space.

 *  Capital Cost — In some cases,  new facilities will need to
    be constructed.

 *  Material Compatibility — Corrosion of metals or delayed
    environmental stress cracking  of cenam polymers may
    occur.

 «  Water — In some applications high punty water is needed.
    Pure water can be expensive.

 *  Energy Consumption — Energy  consumption may  be
    higher than solvent cleaning if applications require heated
    nnse and  drying stages.

 *  Wastewatcr Disposal"—  In some instances, wastewater
    may require treatment pnor to discharge.

-------
                                                                                                  41
 Process Equipment

 Typical  aqueous  cleaning  equipment  can be
 classified into two general categories:  in-line and
 batch.   In-line  equipment is generally highly
 automated and allows for continuous processing of
 the product being cleaned.  Batch cleaning requires
 that  operators load  and  unload  the cleaning
 equipment after each cycle is completed.  Given
 equal cleaning cycle times, in-line  cleaners allow
 for a significantly higher throughput  than 'batch
 cleaners.

 Hie  in-line and  batch equipment can be further
 classified according to the method by which the
 cleaner is applied to the part to be cleaned.  Hie
 three basic methods of  aqueous  cleaning are
 immersion,  spray,  and ultrasonic.    Exhibit  7
 presents  an  overview  of the  advantages and
 disadvantages of these three types of equipment.

 Immersion equipment cleans by immersing parts in
 an aqueous solution and using agitation or heat to
 displace and float away contaminants.  Agitation
 can be either mechanical or ultrasonic.

 Spray equipment  cleans parts  with  a solution
 sprayed   at  medium-to-high  pressure.   Spray
 pressure can vary from as low as 2 psi to 400 psi or
 more.  In general, higher  spray pressure is more
 effective  in  removing soil from metal surfaces.
 Aqueous cleaners that are specifically designed for
 spray application are prepared  with low foaming
•detergents.

 The spray design should be able to reach all part
 surfaces by mechanically manipulating the part or
 the spray nozzles.   Although  spray  cleaning  is
 effective  on a wide variety of parts, some part
 configurations may  be  difficult to  clean using
 currently available spray technology. For example,
 parts with capillary spaces and blind holes may
 trap low surface tension cleaning solutions.  This
'is  particularly a  concern in precision cleaning
 applications. Sometimes, high velocity sprays can
 improve the flushing action to remove the cleaning
 solution.  However,  in other  cases, immersion
 cleaning may be more effective.

 A   number  of  disk   drive   and   aerospace
 manufacturers currently use high velocity sprays for
 critical cleaning.   It has been  found  that these
.sprays are effective in removing .surface active
agents when  high purity water is used, and when
the sprays have an increased turbulent layer and
reduced laminar sublayer.

A high pressure spray is an effective final  rinse
step.  Pressures  may  range  from  100 psi in
noncritical applications to 500 - 2000 psi in critical
applications.   Optimization of nozzle design such
as  spray  pattern,  drop  size and   formation,
pressure/velocity, and volume have a major impact
on effectiveness.  A final  spray is much cleaner
than  an  immersion rinse, since the water spray
contacting the part can be highly pure and filtered.

Ultrasonics equipment works well with water-based
processes.   Because the  cavitation efficiency is
higher for water than for CFC-113 and MCF, the
removal of particles from surfaces is usually more
effective in aqueous versus organic solvent media.
A plant should exercise caution in the design of
the  cleaning  process  to  insure  that cavitation
erosion of part surfaces is not a problem.  Certain
part  geometries are also sensitive to ultrasonic
agitation.

It is  important to optimize system  operations
when using  ultrasonic systems.   The  current
industry  practice is to  use a 40  kHz operating
frequency for  delicate operations.  Since good
ultrasonic  cleaners have  few  standing waves,
reflection from the surface and  the  walls is an
important consideration. The number of parts and
their orientation to walls, fixtures, and other parts
will impact cleaning performance.

The fixtures on the ultrasonic equipment should be
low mass, low surface energy,  and nonabsorbing
cavitation resistant material such as a  stainless
steel wire frame. Avoid using plastics for fixtures
because of leaching and absorption of sonic energy.

Both ultrasonic and spray equipment can be used
together to great advantage, especially in rinsing.
Low  pressure (40-80 psi)  spray at relatively high
volumes  is good for initial rinsing. It is critical to
keep the part wet at all times prior to final drying.
A   secondary  immersion-ultrasonic   rinse   is
especially useful for parts with complex geometry
or blind holes.

-------
42
                                     Exhibit?

              AQUEOUS CLEANING PROCESS EQUIPMENT
     IMMERSION WITH
       ULTRASONIC  .
        AGITATION
     IMMERSION
 WITH MECHANICAL
     AGITATION
  SPRAY WASHER
    ADVANTAGES
    High level of cleanliness;
    cleans complex parts/
    configurations

    Can be automated

    Usable with parts on
    trays

    Low, maintenance

    May be performed at
    ambient temperature
Cleans complex parts
•and configurations

Will flush out chips

Simple to operate

Usable with parts on
trays
         
-------
                                                                                                  43
 Effective rinsing is a key part of aqueous cleaning
 in precision applications. Residues of water-based
 cleaning  media,  such  as synthetic detergents,
 surfactants, and additives, may have a detrimental
 effect on  component performance and reliability.
 Elements such as sodium  and sulfur are common
 synthetic detergent materials that may remain on
 surfaces. Substances such  as phosphorus, calcium,
 magnesium, chlorides, hydrocarbon films, amines,
 and nitrates are also potential residues of aqueous-
 based systems. Rinsing is particularly critical in
 parts with capillaries or complex geometry, where
 aqueous cleaning solutions might easily be trapped.
 In some instances final rinsing with DI water or an
 alcohol, such as isopropanol, can remove residues
 and prevent water spots.
  Process Details

  The aqueous cleaning procedure used in precision
  cleaning consists of three general process steps:

  •  Wash Stage

  •  Rinse Stage

  •  Dry Stage

  Exhibit 8 provides a conceptual diagram of the
  different stages that make up the aqueous cleaning
  process.   The following is  a description of the
  three stages.

  Wash Stage.   The  wash stage  in  an aqueous
  cleaning process refers  to  the  application of a
  water-based cleaner, often containing  detergents
  and  surfactants.    The   method  of cleaner
  application  is primarily dependent on the part or
  surface being cleaned.

  Relatively small assemblies may be immersed in a
  tank which contains the cleaning agent.  Often this
'  solution  will be heated  to improve  cleaning.   If
  immersion tanks are used, contamination build-up
  in the cleaning solution must be monitored.  When
  the level of contamination becomes too high, the
  cleaner should be  treated and reused or disposed
  of. Parts which are too large for immersion tanks
  may be cleaned using a hand-held wand-type spray
  washer.
  Rinse Stage.   In the rinse stage of the aqueous
  cleaning  process, all of the  cleaning solution
  applied during the wash stage is removed from the
.  part being cleaned. As the cleaner is removed, all
  of the  contaminants which have been displaced
  and/or solubiiized are also removed from the part.
  The rinse is often performed using water with no
  additives or,  in some  cases,  deionized  water.
  However, rinse aids are sometimes added to water
  to cause the  water  to form a sheet  rather than
  "bead  up."  This sheeting action  reduces water
  spots and aids in quicker, more uniform drying.

  The rinse processes used in precision cleaning .are
  identical to those employed in  the wash stage -
  immersion or spray.  In some cases, several rinse
  stages are required.

  Dry Stage.  The dry stage  is a vital part of an
  aqueous cleaning process. For simple parts, drying
  may be relatively easy, but for complex parts,
  drying is often more difficult.

  There  are several  drying  methods'  currently
  employed after the aqueous cleaning of parts.  The
  first is the use of a  drying oven.  These units
  evaporate excess water through the application of
  heat and can accommodate a wide variety of parts.
  The second drying option is a manual wipe with a
  dry cloth or mop to absorb the excess water from
  the clean part.  This method is  not adequate for
  parts with small crevices  and/or  closely spaced
  components since a cloth or mop may not be able
  to fit into the small spaces where  water may be
  trapped.   A  third method for removing excess
  water is through forced air drying. In this method,
  hot air is blown onto the cleaned part to force
  water off the  part.  Applications where the air is
  blown at an angle of approximately  45° are known
  as air knives.  A fourth method for drying parts
  after cleaning is the use of dewatering oils. These
  oils, when placed en  a cleaned surface, displace.
  moisture and  provide a thin film preservative on
  the part.  As  an alternative  to these four drying1
  methods, some  plants choose to let  the cleaned
  parts dry in air.  Given enough drying time, all
  residual water should evaporate, leaving a clean,
  dry part.  However, air drying increases the risk of
  corrosion and  may  leave  residual  salts  from
  evaporation on  the component.

  If the forced  air drying method is  used, compact
  turbine blowers with filtered outputs may be used

-------
44
                                 Exhibits

   CONFIGURATION OF AQUEOUS CLEANING PROCESS
          Part* from
        "Manufacturing
           Process
           Solution
       Reclrcutation:
    Filtering, Skimming
                     Wash
                     Stage:'
                  Haaiad Detergent
                  Solution: Spray,
                  Immenton
                  Ultrasonics, etc.
   Rinse
   Stage:
   Water.
Spray, Immersion
  Dryer:

Room Temp Air
of Heated Air
                       Periodic Removal
Cleaned
Parts Ready
for Continued
Production
                 Waste Treatment
  Source: EPA 1989
                                        M70J4-1

-------
                                                                                                45
as a  source of air.   Blowers  are capable  of
removing 90 percent or more of water from parts.
Design options in  blowers  include variation  of
pressure, velocity, and volume flow. Other sources
of air include dedicated compressors and plant air.
Plants should use filters to remove oil, panicles,
and moisture to achieve the desired level of air
quality.  When using the forced air drying method,
issues such as noise, humidity, and air conditioning
may have to be considered.

Regardless of the drying method selected, a plant
should test the method's effectiveness before it is
implemented.
Other Process Details

Hie following are additional process details that
will  influence a facility's decision regarding the
feasibility of aqueous cleaning.

Removal 0f Owning Fluids,  Care should be taken
to prevent cleaning fluids from becoming trapped
in holes and capillary spaces.  Low surface tension
cleaners sometimes penetrate spaces and are not
easily displaced by a higher surface tension, pure
water rinse.  Penetration into small spaces is a
function  of both  surface  tension  and capillary
forces.

Improving Process Control. Water-based cleaning is
sometimes not as forgiving as CFC-113 and MCF
cleaning.  A plant may have to  experiment with
process control  in  order  to  achieve  optimal
washing  with   aqueous  cleaning.    Different
parameters that may need to be varied include
bath temperatures,  pH,  agitation,  rinse  water
quality, and cleaning bath  quality.  Parts can be
inspected for cleanliness using tests such as the
Contact Angle test or ASTM-F24 test, as described
in the Technical section of the Methodology for
Selecting an Alternative Cleaning Process.

Wastewater Issues.' One of the major drawbacks
associated with the use of aqueous cleaning is the
fact  that wastewater. treatment may be required
prior to discharging spent cleaner and rinse water.
In some applications the cleaning bath is changed
infrequently  and  a  relatively  low volume  of
wastewater is discharged. In others, the water can
be evaporated  to  leave only a small volume of
concentrated waste for recycling. Plants that make
extensive use  of aqueous  cleaning  may  find
themselves with substantial wastewater treatment
needs.  Facilities considering a switch to aqueous
cleaning should consult with their local water
authorities  to  determine  the  need  for  pre-
treatment  of  wasiewater  prior to  discharge.
Wastewater  minimization   and  treatment  is
'discussed in further detail later in this manual.

Water Recycling. Recycling or regene'ratiqn of the
cleaner/detergent solution is feasible and should be
considered.   This can be accomplished using a
combination of oil skimming techniques, coalescing
separators, and membrane filtration (ceramic or
polypropylene membranes).   Vendors of aqueous
cleaners sometimes  pick-up  spent  cleaner from
customers, recycle it, and re-sell it.

-------
46

-------
                                                                                             47
 SEMI-AQUEOUS  CLEANING
 Semi-aqueous  cleaning involves  the  use of  a
 nonwater-based cleaner with a water rinse. While
 it is most frequently used in metal cleaning, it is
 also used in electronics  and precision cleaning.
 Semi-aqueous cleaners can consist of a wide variety
 of chemical constituents.   Examples  of semi-
 aqueous  cleaning   formulations  are
 hydrocarbon/surfactant mixtures, alcohol blends,
 terpenes, and petroleum distillates.

 The advantages of semi-aqueous cleaning solutions
 include the  following:

 * Good  cleaning ability;  typically superior  to
   aqueous  cleaning  for heavy grease, tar, waxes,
   and hard-to-remove soils;

 - Compatible with most metals and plastics;

 • Suppressed vapor pressure (especially if used in
   emulsified form);

 • Non-alkalinity of'process prevents etching of
   metals, thus helping to keep metals out of the
   waste stream-and minimizing potential adverse
   impact to the-substrate;

 • Reduced  evaporative loss;

 • Potential decrease in solvent purchase cost;

 • A  rust  inhibitor  can  be included in  the
   formulation  to protect parts from rusting.

 Drawbacks associated with the use of semi-aqueous
 cleaning processes include:

, • Rinsability problems; thus residues may remain
   on the part;       *

 • Disposal  of spent  solvent after water recycling
   may increase costs;

 * Flammability  concerns,   particularly   if   a
   concentrated cleaner   is  used in  a  spray
   application.  However, the flammability issue
   can be solved with proper equipment design;
   Some cleaners have objectionable odors;

   Some of the cleaners are VOCs;

   Drying  equipment may be required in some
   applications;

   Some cleaners can auto-oxidize in the presence
   of air.  One example of such a cleaner is d-
   limonene (a terpene hydrocarbon isomer). This
   can be reduced using an antioxidant additive;

   Some constituents pose potential exposure risks
   to workers. For example, ethylene giycol methyl
   ether has displayed evidence of potential risk in
   laboratory animals.
Process  Equipment

The equipment normally used in a typical semi-
aqueous cleaning process is similar to that used in
aqueous applications: immersion equipment and
spray equipment.

While   equipment  that  has  been  designed
specifically for use with concentrated semi-aqueous
cleaners is available, some vapor degreasing units
can be modified to become immersion wash tanks.
However, rinse tanks are usually also required.

Immersion equipment is still the simplest method
of cleaning parts.  The primary distinction of semi-
aqueous  immersion  cleaning  from  aqueous
immersion  cleaning is  that, due to the  high
solvency of hydrocarbon/surfactant  blends, less
mechanical  energy may  be required to achieve a
satisfactory  level  of  cleanlinefs.   However,  to
achieve a higher level of cleanliness, agitation must
be added to the  process,  either mechanically  or
with ultrasonics, or the cleaning solution must  be
heated.

As with aqueous cleaning, a mechanical spray can
improve the cleaning performance of the semi-
aqueous cleaning solution. It is important to note

-------
 48
 that,  if a  spray is used  with a  concentrated
 hydrocarbon/surfactant  blend,  the   atomized
 solution is prone to combustion and special care
 must  be taken to prevent  fire risks.  One such
 prevention measure is the use of a  nitrogen
 blanket which  displaces oxygen from the  spray
 chamber, thereby reducing" fire risk.

 One semi-aqueous cleaning option, called "spray-
 under immersion," combines both immersion and
 spray  cleaning techniques. In this equipment, high
 pressure spray nozzles are placed below the surface
 of the* liquid.  This prevents the formation of
 atomized solution and decreases risk associated
 with flammability. Workpiece movement may also
 be used to enhance cleaning without increasing the
 flammability hazard of the semi-aqueous cleaner.
 Process Details

 Just as  the  equipment used  in  semi-aqueous
 cleaning processes  is  similar  to  that  used in
 aqueous cleaning, so too are the cleaning stages.
 The semi-aqueous cleaning process consists of a
 wash stage, a rinse stage, and a dry stage.  Exhibit
 9 shows a  schematic for a typical semi-aqueous
 cleaning process.

 There are  two primary differences between the
 aqueous and semi-aqueous cleaning processes. The
 first is the cleaner which is used in the wash stage.
 As  mentioned, rather than the simple detergent
 and water mixture used in aqueous cleaning, semi-
 aqueous  processes make  use  of any one  of a
 number of cleaning agents, including hydrocarbons,
 alcohols, and terpenes.

 The cleaner is applied  to the part  being  cleaned
 using  some  form of  mechanical   energy.    As
 mentioned, however, due  to the fact that semi-
 aqueous cleaners generally have higher solvency
 power  than  aqueous cleaners, less mechanical
'energy is usually needed 10 achieve an acceptable
 level of cleanliness.

 Low flash point hydrocarbon/surfactant  cleaners
 are  generally not heated;" however, some are
 slightly warmed  when  the cleaner  is used in a
 diluted  form.  .High flash  point  hydrocarbon/
 surfactant cleaners may be heated to within 20 to
 30°F (-7 to -l°e) of their flash point to  remove
difficult  soils.   When -using  cleaners  that are
ignitable, it is best to apply them using methods
that do not mist such as spray-under immersion or
ultrasonics.  If the cleaners are used in vapor- or
spray cleaning, they should be used with an inert
atmosphere or other protective equipment.

The second difference between the aqueous and
semi-aqueous cleaning process lies in the addition
of a second, emulsion wash stage after the initial
wash and before the rinse.  In  this stage, the part
is immersed in an emulsion which further cleans
the part and helps to .remove soils from the part's
surface. This step results in less contamination of
the rinsewater, making recycling of the rinsewater
easier than it would be otherwise.  The emulsion ,
cleaner is sent to a decanter where the soils are
removed  from the cleaner.  The cleaner can then
be reused in the emulsion wash.

A rinse with clean water removes the residues left
by the wash step(s).  The  rinse step is necessary
when concentrated cleaners are used because of
their  low volatility  (which  prevent  them  from
evaporating from the parts cleaned in the wash
stage).   However,  the  rinse  step  may not be
necessary when a dilute hydrocarbon emulsion is
used, provided the level of cleanliness needed does
not require removal of the residue from the wash
stage.   In   some instances, a fast evaporating
alcohol is used as a final rinse step. The rinse step
may also  serve as a finishing process and, in some
instances, is used to apply rust inhibitors to the
parts.

The drying step serves the same function as in
aqueous cleaning.  The  removal of excess water
from the part prepares it  for  further  processing
and prevents it from rusting. The same types of
drying methods used in aqueous cleaning — heat;
forced air, manual wipe, dewatering oils, ambient
air  drying  —  are  also  used in  semi-aqueous
processes.

Another  similarity between aqueous  and semi-
aqueous  processes   is  the possible   need for
wastewater treatment. In order to avoid processing
excessive quantities of wastewater, some plants may
choose to  recycle their spent cleaners.  Some
currently available semi-aqueous cleaners can be
easily separated from the rinse water. This allows
the rinse water to be recycled or reused.   The
waste cleaner can then be burned as fuel.

-------
                                                  49
                  ExMbit9

    SEMI-AQUEOUS PROCESS FOR
IMMISCIBLE HYDROCARBON SOLVENT
Hydrocarbon/
 .Surfactant
 Waah Stage
Emulsion
 HInw
Rim*
  IHyw
Fora id Hot Air
                                           Cleaned
                                           Part*
Hydrocarbon/
 Surfactant

  Reuse
 DIspOMor
  Recycle
                             (T)Ck>«»d Loop Water
                              Treatment

                             0SHe Water
                              Treatment or
                                        C3)tXreettoDraln
                  Do canter
                                                 F470M4

-------
50

-------
PRESSURIZED GASES
                                                                                            51
When   removing   paniculate   contamination,
pressurized gases can serve as an alternative to
cleaning with CFC-113 and MCF. Gases that are
typically  used include  air, rare gases,  carbon
dioxide, chlorodifluoromethane (HCFC-22), and
nitrogen.  These gases, which may be stored at
room temperature, are  readily available in bulk
and smaller quantities, and in numerous grades of
purity.

Depending upon the pressurized gas that is used in
the cleaning application, the advantages of cleaning
with pressurized gases may include the following:

»  Low viscosity

•  Low toxicity

*  High diffusitivity
                                           t
•  Nonflammability

•  Low capital cost

The  drawbacks  associated  with  the  use  of
pressurized gases may include:

•  I «ow density

•  High pressure (may cause rupturing of seals)

•  Often  not effective for removing microscopic
   particles

•  May not  be appropriate for 'cleaning some
   critical components.
Process Chemistry

Air.  Dry air is produced  using ordinary air by
removing hydrocarbons through oxidation. Carbon
dioxide is removed from the air, and the air is then
compressed and dried.
Clean dry air may be economically produced from
pressurized air  in-house.   Specifically designed
diaphragms and  other noncontaminating pumps
are available for this purpose.  High efficiency
filters, drying agents, and other equipment are also
useful.

Rare Gases.  Helium, neon, argon, krypton, and
xenon are all rare gases. Unlike air, which reacts
with many substances due, to its  high  oxygen
content,  rare earth gases are noted for their
extreme chemical inactivity.  These monatomic
gases are obtained by fractionation of liquid air.

Argon, the most abundant  of the rare earth gases,
is commercially available in cylinders ranging from
1,775 to 6,000 psig at 2L1°C.  Argon is not toxic,
but is an asphyxiant.

A problem inherent in cleaning with high pressure
gases  is the  development  of  static charges.
Ionizing  guns  are available from  clean  room
equipment  suppliers  that  can  alleviate  this
problem.

Carbon Dioxide.  Carbon  dioxide, which can be
recovered from a number of processes, is colorless,
odorless, nonflammable, and slightly acidic. When
used in pressurized cleaning, carbon dioxide does
not contribute to global warming since its primary
source is the air itself.

The gas is stable under most conditions,  but will
dissociate into  carbon  dioxide  and   carbon
monoxide in the presence  of free carbon at high
temperatures.   For  example,  at  1000°C, the
equilibrium ratio of carbon  dioxide to  carbon
monoxide is 0.7 percent to 99.3 percent.
                           t
Above the critical temperature of -31°C, all solid
carbon dioxide converts to a gas.  The gas can be
shipped under its own vapor pressure of 830 psig
at 21.1°C.  Care must be taken when handling
carbon dioxide because it is  an  asphyxiant, and
cumulative amounts of the gas are poisonous.

-------
 52
 JtCFC-22,  Chlorodifluoromethane, or HCFC-22,
 is  colorless  and  nonflammable.    Continued
 flooding of localized areas with liquid HCFC-22
 causes rapid chilling, which helps to remove more
 tenacious contaminants.

 At high temperatures, various metals may catalyze
 decomposition of HCFC-22.   Silver  is the most
 reactive with HCFC-22, followed by brass, bronze,
 aluminum, 1340 steel, copper, nickel, 18-8 stainless
 steel, and inconel.  Magnesium  and aluminum
 alloys with 2 percent or more magnesium are also
 particularly reactive with HCFC-22 in the presence
 of water. Natural rubber may also become swollen
 and degraded by the solvent.

 HCFC-22 is often shipped as a liquified gas under
 Its own pressure of 123 psig at 21.1°C. The gas is
 available in bulk and small disposable cans. Direct
 contact with liquid HCFC-22 may cause frostbite.
 The gas is considered to be nontoxic, but high
 concentrations can produce dizziness, narcosis, and
 nausea.

 HCFC-22 has an ozone depletion potential (ODP)
 of 0.05.  In comparison, MCF and CFC-113 have
 ODPsofO.1 and 0.8 respectively. Because HCFC-
 22 is an ozone-depleting chemical, it's  use is slated
 fur reduction and elimination by the year 2030
 under the  1992  amendments to the  Montreal
 Protocol.  The solvent is also subject to production
 control requirements under the  Clean  Air Act
 Amendments of 1990. Therefore, while HCFC-22
 may be a viable short-term substitute  to CFC-113
 «r MCF, its long-term use is limited.

 To reduce the health and environmental impacts of
 HCFC-22, a plant should take measures to reduce
 emissions during use.

 Nitrogen.   Nitrogen  can react  with hydrogen,
 oxygen, and some metals at elevated temperatures.
 Reactive  metals  include calcium, barium, and
/magnesium.  A very  reactive form of nitrogen,
 called active nitrogen,  is  produced  when it  is
 passed through a glow discharge at low pressure.
 Active nitrogen combines with mercury, arsenic,
 zinc, calcium, sodium, phosphorous, and sulphur to
 produce nitrides.
Equipment Considerations

Typically, clean, dry, inert gas or air is fed to a
pressurized gas gun at 100 psi. Many models offer
0.3 to  0.5 micron  panicle filtration  with  a
maximum outlet pressure of ionized gas at 30 psi.
Different ionizing and filtration techniques have
been designed for specific needs. /One model is
reported to remove 3.0 micron size particles with
99 percent efficiency from bare silicon wafers.

Whether  the  ejected  material  produced  by
pressurized gas will damage surrounding surfaces
depends on the composition of the contaminant
and substrate.  For example, metal dust can be
easily removed from an assembly using pressurized
gas.  However, if the assembly includes an optical
component with a sensitive coating, the component
may be scratched by impinging particles. Particles
with low  mass may not  damage the sensitive
surfaces.   Likewise,   harder components may be
resistant to scratching and indentation by particles.

Dislodged particles may also be  a  cause for
concern because clean room requirements as well
as surrounding structure may not tolerate increased
levels of contamination.  Ejected debris can be
contained when small parts are being cleaned by
performing the cleaning process in a lapinar flow
work  station equipped  with a high  efficiency
paniculate air filter or an ultra-low penetration air
filter.   A vacuum  may also be  used  with
pressurized gas on some parts to capture dislodged
contamination.
Process Details

Some of the  primary considerations in choosing
pressurized gases  for precision cleaning  include
following properties:

* Surface chemistry.   This factor  is ultimately
  responsible for the nature o'f the electrostatic
  forces between surfaces;

« Porosity. Porous (and rough) surfaces possess
  the potential to mechanically lock contaminant
 • and substrate and  further hinder the cleaning
  process;-

-------
                                                                                               53
Roughness  of surface.   Large  particles  on  a
smooth surface may be removed,more  easily
than small panicles on a rough surface for the
same reason;

Size, shape, and homogeneity of the contaminant.
On a microscopic level, all surfaces possess
ridges and valleys that make intimate contact
between   surfaces   difficult.     Adsorbed
contamination  on panicles and other surfaces
also  hinders contact and prevents  relatively
short-range  molecular   interactions   from
occurring;

Sensitivity of the  surrounding area  to  ejected
material. Relatively inert gases and mixtures are
most   often  used with  specially   designed
equipment to  meet cleanliness requirements
without damaging the surrounding area.

-------
S4

-------
                                                                                              55
SUPERCRITICAL FLUIDS
Supercritical fluids (SCFs) are a special category of
pressurized gases. Specifically, they are fluids that
are above their critical values for temperature and
pressure.  The critical region is characterized by
the following conditions:
            0.9 < Tr < 1.2 and
            1.0 
-------
SB
behavior.  Phase equilibrium and mass transport
data are used to size equipment, determine utility
requirements,  and estimate  costs.  .  Important
parameters to consider include:

*  the number of phases present; *
» the composition and density of each phase;

« the  equilibrium   changes  associated  with
  temperature,   pressure,   and  composition
  variation.            ,  >

Exhibit 10

DATA FOR TYPICAL SUPERCRITICAL
•
Solvent
Methane
Ethylene
Chlorotrifluoromethane
Carbon dioxide
Ethane
Nitrous oxide
Sulfur hexafluoricle
Propylene
Propane
Ammonia
Trichlorofluoromethane
n-Hexane
Isopropanol
Ethanol
Toluene
Water
Critical
Temperature
fdeg. Q
-83
9
29
31
32 '
36
45
92
97
132
198
234
• 235
243
318
374
Critical
Pressure
( atnrt
45.4
49.7
38.7
72.8
48.2
71.5
37.1
45.6
41.9
111.3
43.5
29.3
47.0
63.0
40.6
217.7

SOLVENTS

Density
fp/cmS')
0.16
0.22
OJ&
0.47
0.20
0.45
0.74
0.23
0.22
0.24
0.55
0.23
0.27
• 0.28
0.29
0.32 -

-------
                                                                    57
                           Exhibit 11
   SUPERCRITICAL CARBON DIOXIDE APPLICATIONS
    Hardware
Materials/Components Qeaned  Contaminants Removed
Spacecraft



Radar



Laser


Gas system


Cleaning aid
High voltage cables
Bearings
Rivets

Connectors
Transformers
Cables

Optical benches   .
O-rings
                i
Seals
Cotton ball/wipers
Cotton tipped applicators
Silicon e oils
Lubricants
Flux residues
Dielectric oils
Machine oils
Plasticizers

Plaslicizers
Monomers  «

Organic extractables
Triglycerides
Adhesive residues

-------
58
                             Exhibit 12

          BASIC MODEL DESIGN FOR CARBON DIOXIDE
              SUPERCRITICAL CLEANING SYSTEM
     Pressure Regulator
     /T"\
                    Pump
                    Pump 2
              Conditioner
  Carbon Dioxide
   Gts Supply
    High Pressure
    Vessel
             \
                                                          Exhaust
                                                   Separator,
Gauge
  Source: Jackson 1987
                                                           FX7084-3

-------
 GAS  PLASMA CLEANING
                                                                                               59
 Gas plasma cleaning is typically used as  a final
 clean in a multi-stage process to achieve surfaces
 completely free of organic contamination.  It is
. used in a variety of industries, including electronic,
 automotive* medical, textiles, and plastics to clean
 and surface treat  microelectronic devices, plastic
 automotive bumpers, stainless steel syringe needles,
 angioplasty balloon catheters, plastic lenses, golf
 balls,  lawnmower distributor covers, and other
 products.

 Gas plasma cleaning  involves using electrically
 excited, nontoxic  gas  such  as oxygen or air  to
 remove thin  layers of organic residues.   The
 electrically excited gas, called plasma, is made up
 of electrons, ionized atoms, and neutral molecular
 fragments (free radicals). The molecular fragments
 combine with the organic surface films to form
 small  quantities of volatile gaseous by-products
 such as carbon dioxide, water vapor, and trace
 amounts  of  carbon   monoxide   and   other
 hydrocarbons.

 The advantages of using plasma cleaning include
 the following:

 • Process gases are relatively cheap, nontoxic, and
   noncaustic.  Examples of gases are air, oxygen,
   argon, helium, and silicon tetrafluoride;

 • Because the reactions occur on the surface of
   the part, the bulk of the part is unaffected;

 • Gas plasma cleaning is compatible with most
   metals, ceramics, and glass materials;

 • Plasma cleaning offers a  high level of  worker
   safety because cleaning takes place in a closed
   vacuum chamber and the reaction by-products
   are evacuated through a vacuum pump as soon
   as they are formed;

 •. Operating costs are low  compared to  solvent
   cleaning because there is no need to regularly
   monitor, replenish, and dispose of chemicals;

 • The plasma cleaning process cleans and  surface
   treats at the same time.  Gas removes organic.
   contaminants and chemically combines with the
   material  surface  to  enhance  its  chemical
   properties for adlliesive bonding ~ it makes the
   surfaces more polar and allows adhesives to fill
   surface micro-pores and form stronger covalent
   bonds;

•  By-product vapors do not require scrubbing and
   can  be  vented  to  the  atmosphere through
   standard hose exhaust.

There are also several disadvantages to using gas
plasma cleaning. These include the following:

•  Capital  costs  are  initially  high  and  the
   equipment is higltily specialized. Reactor costs
   are typically $20,000 to $130,000.

•  For  space systems  such as satellite optical
   components that  must be cleaned during use,
   the plasma gases must be provided at launch or
   produced chemically;

•  It may be difficult to determine exactly how
   long   the  process   should  last.     Outer
   contaminant-layers are stripped  faster and at
   lower energies than layers close to the original
   surface.  A possible reason for this could be
   that the inner contaminant layers are exposed to
   more UV radiation from  the plasma itself, and
   therefore cross-polymerize and form stronger
   bonds with the  surface of the  pan.    This
   uncertainty could lead to overuse of process gas
   supplies;

•  Using oxygen as a process gas produces a visible
   film on the surface of gold mirrors. Such a film.
   may be difficult  to remove'and,  if left on the
   mirror, can increase light scattering;

•  Plastics may be superficially etched by oxygen
   after extended cleaning;

•  The energy of tbe process must  be limited to
   avoid  sputtering, a 'phenomenon  that  can
   damage the elements being cleaned;

-------
 60
    Because  cleaning  capacity  is  low,   gross
    contamination must be removed prior to plasma
    cleaning.
 Process Chemistry

 Cleaning occurs through the combined action of
 UV light and atomic oxygen fragments reacting
 with organic residues on the part.  Although some
 chemical  reactions between the  plasma  and
 contaminants are not understood, most of the by-
 products formed are the result of conventional
 chemical reactions. The reaction is similar to the
 normal combustion of hydrocarbons, but at lower
 temperatures (25°C - 50°C). The nighty energized
 ions  and  UV • light  help, break  apart  the
 hydrocarbons and provide the  activation energy
 necessary to  start the chemical reactions.   The
 formula for the two stages of reactions may be
 written as:

   O2 4- RF energy •* 2O + ions + electrons  +
                      UV light & visible light
       • O plasma •* CO2 + H2O + CO +
                      smaller hydrocarbons

 The quantity of by-product gas generated is so low
 that  one year of plasma cleaning produces the
 equivalent  of  approximately  10  minutes  of
 automobile exhaust.
 Process Equipment

 A typical  plasma cleaning system consists of a
 vacuum chamber made of aluminum, a vacuum
 pump,  a radio-frequency generator, a gas flow
 module, and  a microprocessor-based controller.
 The vacuum chamber, which can be cylindrical or
 planar, holds the components for cleaning. Within
 the vacuum chamber is a set of electrodes, which
,may be in the form of a cage or removable shelves.
 During  cleaning, the radio-frequency source  is
 connected across these electrodes.  The  radio-
 frequency  generator supplies the  energy for
 creating plasma. The control equipment governs
 the composition of the reagent gas, the flow-rate of
 the reagent gas, the radio-frequency power, the
 reactor's operating pressure,  and the processing
 time. Most applications use the closed-vacuum
chambers in batch mode, but continuous cleaning
is also possible.

Many sizes of systems are currently available -for
cleaning applications, ranging from small, modified
microwave  ovens to large chambers designed to
hold several car bumpers. As mentioned earlier,
.the initial  cost of a plasma cleaning system  is
relatively high:   one  medium-sized system  is
approximately $60,000.  However, the operating
costs are fairly low.  One tank of industrial grade
oxygen gas  costs approximately $20, and will last
more than a year for light cleaning/ Furthermore,
training time is low because of the ease of using
plasma cleaning equipment.
Process Details

To use the gas plasma cleaning system, pans are
placed on the  electrodes  inside  the  vacuum
chamber.  The vacuum is then pumped down to
about O.OS Torr.  While pumping continues, the
gas is introduced to the system at a regulated
pressure of 0.1  to 1 Torr.  The radio frequency
generator, operating at 13.56 MHz, supplies the
excitation power. A pale blue gas occurs when the
radio-frequency source is 'connected across the
electrodes.

The power, time, pressure, gas flow rate, and gas
type  can  be varied  to optimize  the cleaning
process. Most systems offer automatic control of
these process variables. Multi-step processes can
be stored in the controller memory, which allows
for high consistency and repeatability.

The cleaning time depends greatly on the specific
process, but generally ranges from a few seconds to
a few hours.   Sophisticated plasma systems are
capable  of strip rates  exceeding 1 micron per
minute at  temperatures near 200°C.  Lower cost
industrial  systems are capable of rates up to 0.2
microns per  minute at 100°Q  or less.    Most
cleaning can occur in less  than  IS  minutes,
assuming larger contaminants  have already  been
removed through another cleaning process such as
hot water  rinsing or  wiping.  Thicker organic
residues up to 0.001 inches may be removed in
about 30 minutes at 150°C.

-------
ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT/OZONE
CLEANING  METHOD
The  UV/ozone cleaning process has been used
successfully to remove thin organic films from a
number of different  surfaces, including  glass,
quartz, mica, sapphire, ceramics, metals, silicon,
gallium arsenide, and polyamide cement.
Process Overview

UV/ozone cleaning is a simple process that is
relatively inexpensive to set up  and operate.
Under  the  proper  conditions, the process can
produce clean surfaces in less than one minute.
Furthermore,  these surfaces will  remain  clean
during storage under UV/ozone.

The basic UV/ozone cleaning process involves the
exposure of a contaminated surface to UV light in
the presence of ozone. Cleaning occurs as a result
of various  photosensitized  oxidation  processes.
Contaminant  molecules   are  excited   and/or
dissociated by the absorption of short-wavelength
UV light.  These molecules and  the free radicals
produced by dissociation react with atomic oxygen
to form simpler, volatile molecules such as carbon
dioxide, water vapor, and nitrogen that can easily
leave the surface.

There are several  variables  that determine  the
effectiveness of UV/ozone cleaning. These include:
contaminants present, precleaning procedure, UV
wavelengths emitted,  distance and atmosphere
between the UV source and the surface  to be
cleaned, contact  angle of the light,  and length of
time of the exposure.

Testing must be  performed to determine optimal
conditions for different surfaces to be cleaned and
contaminants  to be removed.   The part  being
cleaned should be kept as close as  practicable to
the UV light source, to maximize the rate  of
cleaning. Surfaces that have multiple contaminants
or thick layers of contaminants require precleaning
in order for  the  UV/ozone process to  work.
UV/ozone  will  efficiently  clean  organic
contamination,  but   particles  and  inorganic
components are more difficult to remove with this
process.

Because the UV/ozone process requires no moving
parts, it is easy to maintain and operate. However,
both the  use  of UV  light and the presence of
excessive ozone can be dangerous to humans. UV
light can  cause  eye- injuries, and ozone  causes
respiratory distress. Special design considerations
are necessary to accommodate the low workplace
limits for ozone (O.'l ppm).

The UV/ozone process may also cause damage to
the  surface   being   cleaned.    Staining  and
discoloration of materials can result from improper
wavelengths and exposure times. Overexposure of
materials  to UV lijht can also cause corrosion.
One positive side effect of the UV/ozone process
is the neutralization of static charges on insulator
surfaces.
Possible Applications

The UV/ozone cleaning process  has numerous
applications.  Its primary use is substrate cleaning
prior to thin film deposition, such as is necessary
in the production of quartz crystal resonators. The
process is also used for cleaning and storing metal
tools,   masks,  resonator  parts,   and   storage
containers.  Other applications that  have  been
identified  for   UV/ozone  cleaning  include:
photoresist  removal,  the  cleaning of vacuum
chamber walls, photomasks, silicon wafers, lenses,
mirrors, solar panels, and gallium-arsenide wafers.
Future Developments

Future  developments  in   UV/ozone  cleaning
procedures will corne front further testing and

-------
62
experimentation   with   specific   applications.
Cleaning techniques can be refined considerably.

-------
CO2 SNOW
                                                                                              63
CO2 snow is a relatively 'new cleaning technique
that can be used to replace CFC-113 and MCF in
a variety of cleaning applications.  CO2 snow is
produced when liquid CO2, which is stored at high
pressure  (>  800 psi)  at ambient temperature,
moves through specially designed orifices, or "jets".
The CO2 expands and cook rapidly, generating a
combination of solid CO2 particles,.or "snow", and
gas. During cleaning, the snow is directed at the
contaminated  surface, and cleaning occurs as a
result of the momentum transfer between the solid
CO2 particles and paniculate contamination. The
collisions loosen the participates from the surface,
and the gaseous CO2 sweeps them away.  The level
of cleaning can be controlled by adjusting the spray
force, and the size of the area to be cleaned is
changed by varying the spray pattern.

CO2  snow   removes  paniculate  and  organic
contamination from parts  ranging  from small,
extremely delicate  items  to large structures.
Examples of military applications of CO2 snow
cleaning include restoring silicon wafers to original
optical performance; removing thin molecular films
such as Krytox, T-15u, and pump oil; and cleaning
optical components such as glass mirrors, reflective
optical elements, optical  filters, and  windows.
Commercial applications include removing sanding
residue from automobile  body  panels,  nylon
residue from disk drive pans, laser ablated metal
Irom  sunshields,  cleanroom  debris  from  light
valves, and carbon epoxy dust from UV  coatings.,

The following are several advantages to cleaning
using CO2 snow:

• Does not damage sensitive surfaces (e.g., gold
  coatings and pristine silicon);

• Does not depade material or change internal
  properties;

• Leaves no detectable residue;

* Meets  stringent  cleaning  requirements  —
  provides superior cleaning performance
   compared   to   conventional  solvent  spray
   methods;

•  Environmentally  compatible.  CO2 does  not
   damage the ozone layer and is not-hazardous;

•  Does not generate waste or residue, so clean-up
   and disposal problems are eliminated;

•  Cost effective, since CO2 is readily available and
   inexpensive compared to most solvents;

•  Efficient. Spraying time is significantly shoner
   in  comparison   to  solvent  spray  cleaning
   methods.   For  example,  CO2  reduced  the
   cleaning time of aircraft windows from three
   days to one hour, thus saying $1.3 million a
   year.

As mentioned earlier,  CO2 snow is  dispensed
through specially designed orifices or jets.  In some
cases the nozzle is a pan of a hand-held gun, while
in other cases, nozzles are placed inside automated
jet spray cleaning systems.
                   ^
There are several variations of the hand-held gun
currently commercially available,  including  the
fixed-orifice gun and variable-orifice gun.  The
fixed-orifice gun emits a constant stream of CO2
snow.  The nozzle determines the  spray pattern
and   force,  and  snowflake  size.     Various
interchangeable nozzles are available for use with
this gun. 'The operator can clean large quantities
of similarly sized parts, achieving consistent results
with a fixed-orifice gun.  The variable-orifice gun
has an adjustable orifice that allows the operator
to vary the snowflake size and spray force.  It is'
useful when  various contaminants need to be,
removed from a wide range of'parts composed of
different materials.

The semi- and fully-automated jet spray cleaning
systemsoffer moisture-free, temperature-controlled
cleaning environments.   Because nozzle location
and nozzle motion can be  programmed, these
systems  offer high repeatability  with, minimal
operator interaction. Often, these cleaning systems

-------
64
are equipped wjth multiple nozzle capabilities tbat
allow for a wide range of applications (e.g., CO2
jet spray, hot N2 gas).

-------
                                                                                            65
ALIPHATIC  HYDROCARBONS
There is a wide range  of aliphatic hydrocarbon
solvents that can be used in precision cleaning (see
Exhibit  13).    Petroleum  fractions,  commonly
known as mineral spirits or kerosene, are derived
from the distillation of petroleum and are used
extensively in  maintenance cleaning  (e.g., auto
repair).  They are most  often used in single-stage .
cleaning operations in open-top equipment using
ambient   air   drying.      Synthetic  aliphatic
hydrocarbons,  which  offer  closer  control  of
composition, odor, boiling range, evaporation rate,
etc., are  employed  in manufacturing  cleaning
processes as well as in maintenance operations.

The advantages of aliphatic hydrocarbon cleaners
include:

*  Superior cleaning ability for a wide variety of
   soils, especially heavy grease, tar,  waxes and
   hard  to remove soils.   Low surface tension
   allows good penetration into areas with closely
   spaced parts or components;

*  Compatible (non-corrosive) with most rubbers,
   plastics and metals;

«  They employ no water and can therefore clean
   water-sensitive parts;

•  Reduced evaporative loss;

*  No wastewater is produced;

*  Waste streams from those products with flash
   points  greater than  140°F (60°C)  may  be
   classified as nonhazardous;

*  Synthetic  aliphatic  hydrocarbons  are  not
   regulated as hazardous air pollutants under the
   U.S. Clean Air Act;

*  Recyclable,by distillation.   High stability and
   recovery.

The disadvantages of using aliphatic hydrocarbons
include:
•  Flammability  concerns.     However,,  these
   concerns  can  be   mitigated  with  proper
   equipment design  and some  products  are
   available with flash  points greater than 200°F
   (93°C);

•  Slower drying times  than CFC-113 and MCR

«  VOC control may be required.

*  Some grades  have low Occupational Exposure
   Limits.

*  Odors may cause some worker discomfort.

The  steps  in  a typical  aliphatic  hydrocarbon
cleaning  process are  analogous to  those  for
aqueous  or semi-aqueous processes,  with  the
exception that the rinse step may be replaced with
additional wash steps. 'Equipment designs for use
with aliphatic hydrocarbons are modified aqueous
equipment  design:;,  primarily  to   account  for
flammability and VOC concerns.

The  major  steps  in the cleaning  process  are
typically:

*  Wash steps (1 to 3 stages depending on degree
   of   cleaning   needed)  with  an   aliphatic
   hydrocarbon cleaner;

•  Drying step, often using forced air;
                                           i
«  VOC  emission  control  by  destruction   or
   recovery from solvent laden air, if required; and

•  Waste solvent recovery and/or disposal.

The wash steps involve liquid-phase cleaning at
temperatures sufficiently below the flash point of
the fluid. Ultrasonics or other agitation.processes
such  as  immersion spraying can  be used  to
augment cleaning action.  Spraying or misting
processes, where fine droplets are formed, should
be employed only In an inert environment or with
equipment  that can provide protection  against
ignition conditions.  This protection is required

-------
 66
 because fine'droplets can1 ignite at temperatures
 below the bulk fluid flash point.

 Fluids with flash points below approximately 104°F
 (4ff*C) should be operated in unheated equipment,
 at ambient temperatures.  For higher flash points,
 hot cleaning can be employed  to boost cleaning
 action. For systems with good temperature control
 (independent temperature sensors, cutouts, level
.indicators, etc.), a safety margin of 59°F (15°C)
 between the fluid flash point  and the cleaning
 temperature is recommended.  For systems-with
 poor temperature control, a larger margin should
 be employed. .

 Each wash step should  be followed by a  drain
 period, preferably with parts rotation, to minimize
 solvent dragout from stage to stage.

 In  multistage processes, fluid from  one bath is
 periodically transferred to the preceding bath as its
 soil level builds up. Fresh solvent is added only to
 the final bath to ensure the highest cleanliness of
 parts, and spent •solvent is removed only from the
 first stage. Hie drying step normally uses forced
 air, which may  be heated.   If the dryer is  not
 operating at $9°F (15°C) below the flash point of
 the fluid, sufficient air flow should be provided so
that the effluent air composition is well below the
Lower Explosive Limit of the system.

Regardless of whether or not it is required by law,
the VOC recovery step is an important part of the
cleaning  process.  Depending on the aliphatic
hydrocarbon  solvent  chosen,   either  carbon
adsorption  or  condensation  are   the   best
technologies for capturing solvent vapors  from
spent drying air. Numerous vendors  market this
type of  recovery  equipment.   In -some cases,
however, the VOC concentration in the air may be
too  low  to facilitate  recovery  and  catalytic
incineration  may be  necessary to  destroy the
VOCs.

For waste   recovery,   the  best  reclamation
technology for aliphatic hydrocarbons is -usually
filtration and distillation.  One of the'advantages
of some of the aliphatic hydrocarbon solvents with
few impurities and a narrow distillation range is
the high recovery rate in distillation. Should some
disposal  of  residual  solvent be  necessary,  fuel
substitution  or incineration are  good options.
Some companies specialize in the  service of
recycling these solvents and their services may be
contracted by a solvent user.
                                            Exhibit 13
                     PROPERTIES OF ALIPHATIC SOLVENTS
PRODUCT
Mineral Spirits
Odorless Mineral Spirits
140 Solvent
C10/C11 Isoparaffin
C13 N-Paraffin
C10 Cyeloparaffin
Kerosene »
Lb./Gal.
60°F
6.37
6.33
6.54
6.25.
6.35
6.75
6.60
Sp. Gr.
60°/60qF
0.764
, 0.760
0.786
0.750
0.760
0.810
0,790
Boiling,
Range °F
305-395
350-395
360-410
320-340
320-340
330-360
330-495
FL Pt.
°FTGC
105
128
,140
107
200
105
130
KB
32
27
30
29
2S
54
30
Evap
Rate1
0.1
01
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.2
-
 1 n-Butyl Acetate=i
Note:     KB = Kauri Butanol Value
          FI. Pt. = Flash Point

-------
 PERFLUOROCARBONS
                                                                                            67
 Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) offer possible solutions to
 current CFC-113 and MCF users, particularly in
 cleaning parts for  high accuracy gyros,  before
 assembly and  during  strip  down and  rework.
 Because of the extremely high global wanning
 potential of perfluorocarbons, their use is being
 severely restricted in many countries, including the
 United  States.    Acceptable  applications  of
 perfluorocarbons are being limited to only those
 applications in which no other currently available
 alternative that is not an ozone-depleting substance
 is acceptable.  A new line of chemicals known as
 hydrofluorocarbons  (HFCs) is  currently being
 developed for use in general cleaning applications
 and to replace perfluorocarbons.
 Process Chemistry

 The PFCs are a group of compounds in which all
 the  hydrogen  atoms  of  a  hydrocarbon  are
 substituted by fluorine.  Because of the extreme
 electronegativity of the fluorine atom, this total
 substitution results in extreme chemical stability in
 all of  the  compounds.   The compounds are
 virtually inert chemically,  have low toxicity, are
 completely nonflammable,  and have no  ozone
 'Depletion potential.  As a  result of this very low K
 chemical  activity, PFCs  can be used-in medical
 applications and  are safe  in contact with pure
 oxygen  at high pressures.  The excellent chemical
 stability  of  these  fluids  also  makes   them
 compatible with all gyro construction materials
 including beryllium.  Exhibit 14 summarizes the
 compatibility of PFCs with various other materials.

 Because their base hydrocarbons can vary, PFCs
• can have  a wide range of molecular weights and
 structures. This results in a wide range of boiling
 points.     One  manufacturer  identified   six
 compounds  available  commercially with boiling
 points ranging from 29°C to-160°C, at 1 atm.

 All the  PFC compounds are strong infrared
 absorbers. This capability, coupled with the PFCs*
 extremely long atmosphere lifetimes, result in the
chemicals having a very significant global wanning
potential. Another drawback of PFCs is their very
low solvency power, which makes them unlikely to
be very useful for removing oils.

Another major disadvantage of PFCs is their high
cost, resulting from complex synthetic production
processes. A typicaHow to mid-range boiling PFC,
for example, is approximately $90 US per kg (late
1990).
Process  Equipment

Design of  equipment for gyroscope or  other
precision parts cleaning must be specific to each
application.  One requirement for all equipment,
however,  is that it must be hermetically sealed.
Unless effective sealing is achieved,  the loss of
PFC  will  be  prohibitively  expensive  (even
considering the high cost and strategic importance
of the products) and environmentally unacceptable
because of its high global warming potential.  ,
Process  Details
All current high density flotation fluids are soluble
in certain PFCs, allowing them to  be used  for
flushing filled assemblies.

High pressure spraying with PFCs appears to be a
very effective method of particle removal.

-------
                                    Exhibit 14

            PERFLUOROCARBON (RFC) COMPATIBILITY
                       WITH VARIOUS MATERIALS
       Class of MatenaL
Rubbers

Polyethylene, polypropylene

Nylons.

Polystyrene

"Perspex" ("Plexiglass")

FTFE (unfilled)

PVC (Rigid)

PVC (Flexible)

Electronic circuit boards*

Copper and brass

Other Common metals

Silicone and microcircuit chips

Adhesives
Adhesive tapes
Paper
Enamelled wires
Insulating tapes
Paints
Other surface coatings and sealants
                        Observation
<1% linear swell, +.1% change in weight

<\% shrinkage, zero change in weight

Negligible change in dimensions or weight

Variable, generally negligible, shrinkage (e.g., 0.2%)

<0.2% shrinkage, slight loss in' weight

2-3% linear swell, up to 10% increase in weight

Negligible change

Extraction of plasticizer, loss of flexibility (in hot Flutec)

+. <0.1% dimensional change, zero change in weight

Slight tarnishing (from dissolved oxygen)

No e&e-A detectable

No known effect
  No adverse effects detected in any samples tested up to
  the present time
* Including: SRBP, Epoxy, DAP, Silicone, Melamine, Polyester, with filler materials of all common
types.

-------
                                                                                        .69
ALCOHOL CLEANING  WITH
PERFLUOROCARBON
Alcohols such as methyl, ethyl, and isopropyl have
been used extensively for cleaning printed circuit
boards and precision components. They are very
effective in  removing rosin and  polar activators
commonly used in flux.

Safety is the primary difficulty in using alcohols,
which are highly flammable.  Both flame  and
explosion  proofing  are  necessary  equipment
characteristics to prevent  operator  injury  and
equipment damage.   Using  a  perfluorocarbon
(PFC)  "blanket"  adequately  suppresses  the
flammabilily of the alcohol vapor,  thereby allowing
for temperatures sufficiently high for distillation.

PFCs are relatively immiscible with alcohol;  the
two may be used together with little or no mixing.

There are several advantages to using alcohol as a
solvent for precision cleaning.  These include the
following:

*  Alcohol,  being extremely  polar, has great
   solvency  and allows for greater freedom in
   removing paniculate and organic contamination
   thanCFC-113.

•  PFCs are nonflammable, have  low toxicity and
   reactivity,   and  have  no   ozone-depleting
   potential.

*  Relatively  small  amounts of alcohol  are
   required for each cleaning.  This amount varies
   with the process.

•  The nonflammable nature of the alcohol-PFC
   vapor allows for continuous distillation, thus
   permitting clean rinses.

•  Since alcohol and  PFC jhave different boiling
   points, an operating temperature between the
   two will  allow for selective boiling and  will
   prevent the percentage of alcohol in the vapor
   from rising to a point where the vapor becomes
   flammable. Adding water to the alcohol raises
  'the alcohol's flash point above the PFC's boiling
  point.

• Alcohol and PFC a're "clean" agents; i.e., they
  leave no residue, They also evaporate readily at
  low temperatures.

There are also several drawbacks associated with
the  use of alcohol/PFC cleaning.  These include
the  following:

* Safety   systems   must  be   designed   to
  automatically cease operations if the PFC level
  drops below the level necessary to prevent
  explosion.

* PFCs have a high global warming potential.

• PFCs are expensive.

* Pure alcohols are not effective at  removing
  nonpoiar contaminants like grease.

• High capital cost of equipment.

• Uncertain development time and costs.

-------
70

-------
                                                                         71
HYDROCHLOROFLUOROCARBONS FOR
ESSENTIAL APPLICATIONS
Faced with the phaseout of CFC-113 and MCF,
some users of these solvents have looked toward
several hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) (e.g.,
HCFC-225ca,  HCFC-225cb, HCFC-141b, and
HCFC-123) as possible substitutes.  Exhibit 15
presents physical properties of these chemicals.
HCFCs have been attractive alternatives due to
their good  cleaning performance, and their
similarity in application method to CFC-113 and
MCF. ' However, due to their environmental and
health impacts, the use of these substances in
solvent cleaning applications will be severely
limited. At the present time, the only HCFC that
can be used legally in metal cleaning in the U.S. is
HCFC-141b. Under the SNAP rule (described in
the Foreword), HCFC-i41b use will be allowed in
existing equipment until January 1, 1996. After
January 1, 19%, the use of HCFC-141b in any
metal cleaning application will be allowed only as
a replacement for CFC-113, and then only with a
special exemption granted by the U.S. EPA.  At
the time of revision of this manual, the use of
HCFC-225 had not yet been approved for metal
cleaning applications, although a SNAP submission
was pending.
'


Exhibit 15
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
AND OTHER SOLVENT
.
OF HCFCs
BLENDS
CFC-113 MCF HCFC-22Sca HCFC-225cb HCFC-141b
Chemical Formula
Ozone Depleting
Potential
Boiling Point (°C)
Viscosity (cps)
@2S°C
Surface Tension
(dyne/cm)
Kauri-Butanol
Value
Flash Point PC
Toxieity
f*f**t cf^f^uc ^**t j ^^i /"%c (~*c <">j-j*"n
wwlpi wWlr^ «**gwwi2 wrgwigwrlwlg
0.8 0.1 , -0.05
i
47.6 73.9 61.1 ,
0.68 " 0.79 0.59
17.3 25.56 16.3
31 124 34
i
None None None|
Low Low Underway
CaF2CF2CHCIF CHgCFCIg
-0.05 0.11
56.1 32 1
0.61 0.43
17.7 184
30 76
None None
Underway Near Completion

-------
 72
 Therefore, these substances are no longer being
 recommended*  for  use  In   solvent  cleaning
 applications', where workers will be exposed to the .
 chemicals for long periods of time.  In addition,
 two major manufacturers have withdrawn all of
 their HCFC-123 formulations previously marketed
 for solvent cleaning applications.  HCFC-141b is
 currently available and is manufactured by several
 chemical companies  for use in solvent cleaning
 applications. Previous formulations of HCFC-14Ib
 included mixtures with HCFC-123 and methanol,
 but current formulations have dropped the use of
 HCFC-123.  The major drawback associated with
 the use of HCFC-141b is its relatively high ODP of
 0.11. This is only slightly below the ODP of MCF
 (0.12), a  product which HCFC-141b is to be
 replacing.  Because  of the  similarity in  ODP,
 HCFC-141b  is generally seen as an unacceptable
 substitute to MCF.  In the U.S., for example, the
 Environmental Protection Agency has banned the
 use of HCFC-141b as  a substitute for MCF in
 solvent cleaning applications, and  has limited its
 use as  a substitute for CFC-113.   For these
 reasons, it is unlikely that HCFC-141b will be a
 suitable substitute for MCF in  precision cleaning
 applications.

 At the present  time, it appears HCFC-225 is a
 good substitute for CFC-113 in general metal and
 precision cleaning. It is similar to CFC-113 in its
 chemical and physical properties and compatible
 with most plastics, elastomers, and metals.  Thus,
 HCFC-225 has  been  applied as  a CFC-113
 replarsment, where other alternatives can not be
 applied, with relatively few changes in equipment
 or process operations. Jts ability to replace MCF,
 however, is limited because the solvency of HCFC-
(225 is low compared with that of MCF.  When
'combined with other solvents such as petroleum,
 HCFC-225 may serve as an adequate substitute to
 MCF. AH of the toxicological testings of HCFC-
 225ca and HCFC-225cb planned under PAFT-IV
 were completed in early 1994.  Data  from acute
•JOXicity studies indicate that HCFC-225cb has very
 low toxicity.  As a result, an Acute Exposure Limit
 (AEL) of 250 ppm has been set for HCFC-225cb,
 while the more toxic HCFC-225ca has an AEL of
 25 ppm.  Twenty-eight day inhalation studies also
 demonstrate no significant effects, and evidence
 from several genotoxicity studies  indicates that
 neither isomer is  a genetic hazard.  At present,
 there is a capacity for the commercial production
 of a few thousand metric tons HCFC-225 (as a
 mixture of HCFC-225ca and HCFC-225cb).  It is
 anticipated that this capacity will increase soon to
• meet worldwide demand.

 As a means of addressing the ODP of HCFCs, the
 Parties to the  Montreal Protocol  developed a
 phaseout schedule for HCFCs at their November
 1992 meeting in Copenhagen.  Under the  new
 amendment, HCFC consumption must be frozen at
 the base level by 1996; cut by 90 percent from the
 base level by 2015; cut by 99.5 percent by 2020;
 and cut by 100 percent by 2030. The base level is
 equal  to  3.1  percent  of 1989  CFC  consumption
 plus  100 percent  of  1989 HCFC consumption.
 This phaseout is prompting many potential users
 of HCFCs to switch directly to other alternatives.

 If HCFCs must be used, it is important to consider
 the process design changes that may be required in
 order  to reduce emissions.   For  example,  on
 conventional  degreasers,  freeboards should  be
 extended  and condenser temperatures should be
 lowered.    In  addition,  provisions  such  as
 superheated-vapor drying or increased dwell times
 in freeboard are desirable to reduce dragout losses,

 The high volatility of HCFC  cleaning solutions
 requires special equipment  design  criteria.   In
 addition, the  economic use of HCFCs may require
 special emission  control features for  vapor
 .degreasers (see Exhibit 16a, 16b, and 16c). These
 include:

 * Automated work transport facilities;

 * Hoods and/or automated  covers  on  top entry
   machines;
                                  *
 * Facilities  for work handling  that  minimize
   solvent entrapment;

 • Facilities for superheated vapor drying;

 • Freeboard deepened to width ratios of 1.0 to
   2.0;

 • Main condenser operating at 45° to 55°F (7° to
   Secondary condenser operating at -30° to -20°F
   (-34° to -29°C);

-------
                                                                                                73
*  Dehumidification condenser operating at -30 to
   -20°F (-34° to -29°C)(optional);

*  Seals  and gaskets  of chemically  compatible
   materials;

•  Stainless steel construction;

*  Welded piping containing a minimum of flanged
   Joints;

••  A  gasketed  water  separator or refrigerated
   desiccant dryer for raethanol Mends;  -

*  A cool room to work in is recommended;

•  Controlled exhaust  from refrigeration unit to
•   prevent  excessive  heat  from   reaching  the
   separator chambers.

Material  compatibility  is  another   important
consideration.  Certain HCFC blends may require
compatibility testing with  titanium, magnesium,
zinc and other metals.  Solvent blends have shown
some adverse effects with  plastics such as ABS,
acrylic, and Hi-Impact Styrene. Therefore, plastics
also need to be tested on an individual basis.

-------
74
                          Exhibit 16a

          ADVANCED DESIGN DEGREASER FOR
        USE WITH LOW BOILING POINT SOLVENTS
   Hood
         Hooded Work Transporter on Opem-Top Degreaser
                  Work Transporter
                            Additional
                            Freeboard
                     ,Tumed-in
                     Anti-Diffusion
                     Lip
Dehumidifier
Coll
-20 "F
                                                    Main
                                                    Condenser
                                                    40'-50*F
                                                    Heating
                                                    Coil
   Source: PuPont
                                                        M4038-2

-------
                                                          75
                         Exhibit 16b

       ADVANCED DESIGN DEGREASER FOR
     USE WITH LOW BOILING POINT SOLVENTS
  Turned-ln
 Anti-Diffusion
    Lip
  Vapor Trap
  (optional In
 many eases)
-20° F to-40» F

Main Condenser
   35°F
n

n
                                    Freeboard
                                    Depth = 1*
                                  Gasketed
                                  Desiccant
                                  Dryer with
                                   P-Trap
Vapor Generator
    Sump
                Heating Elements
                            i
•Machine Width = w; w = 1 indicates 100% Freeboard
 Source: Allied-Signal
                                    Rinse Sump
                                                        ' W7Q34-*

-------
76
                             Exhibit 16c

       STACKED LOW EMISSION  DEGREASER WITH
                SOLVENT SAVING  FEATURES
             Closing Ud
              Refrigerated
               Freeboard
              Inter Coll _
               Baffle
              Four Sided
               Cascade
              Condensing
o
o
o
°J
Free °
Board °
o
F.B.R. = 1 Jo
          Convection
          f Current
            Break
          Standby
            Mode

          Defrost
          Trough
    Source; ICi
Solvent Saving
Features
(not shown)
              t
Screwed pipe joints
Correct sealing material
Correct pump seals
Minimum number of
  pipe joints
Degreaser enclosure .
Mechanical handling with
  optional rotation
Correct size, basket  .
                                                              F47034-S

-------
                                                                                        77
N-METHYL-2-PYRROLIDONE
N-Methyl-2-Pyrrqlidone,  also referred to  as M-
Pyrol® or NMP, is miscible with water and most
other organic solvents including esters, ethers,
alcohols,  ketones,  aromatic  and  .chlorinated
hydrocarbons, and vegetable oils. It has powerful
solvent properties as evidenced by its physio-
chemical properties.  These  properties include a
solubility parameter of 11.0, high purity, high flash
point, and low volatility.

Testing of NMP for specific cleaning applications
is underway.  Initial results indicate that NMP is
       effective in ultrasonics applications and cavitates at
       both room temperature and elevated temperatures
       in its 100 percent active form.  Metal substrates
       that have been  successfully tested with NMP
       include carbon steels, stainless steel 304,316,317,
       Carpenter 20CB3 Admiralty brass, Cupro-Nickel
       and ferralium.  Several polymeric materials such as
       Epoxy-Urethane are sensitive to NMP. Exhibit 17
       summarizes  the  solvent's  principal properties.
       Exhibit 18 shows two typical process equipment
       designs that  have been used successfully for both
       batch and in-line operations.
                                       Exhibit 17
                                               i

                         SUMMARY OF PROPERTIES
                       OF N-METHYL-2-PYRROLIDONE
    Empirical Formula
    Molecular Weight
    Freezing Point
    Boiling Point
    Vapor Pressure (20°C)
    Viscosity (25°C)
    Specific Gravity
    Interfacial Surface Tension (25°C)
    Flash Point (open cup)  •
              (closed cup)
    Explosive limits
    Heat of Combustion
    Specific Heat
    Heat of Vaporization
    Miscibility with Other Solvents
    Source: GAF Chemical
99.1
-24.4°e (-1
202°C (395°F) @ 760 mm               '
0.29 j im
1.65 cp '
1.027
40.7 dynes/cm
95°C (204°F)
93°C (199°F)
0.058 grams/filter - lower limit
2.18% vapor in air - 360°F (182°C)
0.323 grams/liter - upper limit
12.24% vapors in air - 370°F (18TC)
719 K eal/mol
0.40Kcal/kgat20°C-
127.3 K cal/kg (230 BTU/lb)
Completely miscible with water and most organic
solvents including alcohols, ethers, ketones, aromatic
and chlorinated hydrocarbons and vegetable oils.

-------
78
                                  Exhibit 18

                   NMP CLEANING PROCESSES
            Cleaning Tank
            xK ,xK xK.
               NMP
           Ambient to 180° F.
            20to30Pslg.
                              SPRAY WASH CLEANING
    (Spray under imnwralon recomrnenctod.)

             Rinse Tanks
                                            xK. xK, xK
             Deionized Water.
              120°F,i2Ps!g
Drying
                                        Forced
                                        Hot Air
                                         or
                                       Vacuum.
                            IMMERSION TANK CLEANING
               Cleaning Tanks
         VWWWW
         wwwwd
vwwvvw
WWWMA-
                  NMP
             • Ambient to 180° F.
           With or without Ultrasonics
                    Rinse Tanks
                   Deionizad Water.
                      200* F.
   Drying
  Slow Pull©
 or Capillary
   Drying.
 Forced Hot
    Air.
        U May bo spray rinsed.

        © Stow incremental removal from Ol water.
         Effective on flat surfaces.
   Source: GAF Chemicals Corporation
                                                                          F4703411

-------
                                                                                              79
OTHER  ORGANIC  SOLVENTS
The precision cleaning industry has always used a
wide range of miscellaneous  solvents.  In most
applications,-such  solvents are used in manual
operations. They are often applied using camel or
sable hair brushes during assembly  or rework.
Typical solvent cleaning applications include:

*  Local defluxing after solder rework operations;

•  Defluxing after special solder operations (e.g.,
   strain gauge lead attachment);

•  Varnish applications (e.g.,  small scale in-situ
   coil impregnations).

Some  of  the  solvents commonly  used include
organic solvents such as ketones, alcohols, ethers,
and  esters, and  chlorinated  solvents  such  as
trichloroethylene,   perchloroethylene,   and
methylene chloride.  Chlorinated solvents will be
described in further detail in the next section.

Organic solvents can be used in either  a heated
state or at room temperature in a dip tank, or in
hand-wipe operations.  However, due to the fact
that most  are flammable,  these types of organic
solvents are most often used at room temperature
in a process commonly known as cold cleaning.

The  ketones form a  group  of very  powerful
solvents (see Exhibit 19).  In  particular, acetone
(dimethyl ketone) and methyl ethyl ketone (MEK)
are good solvents for polymers and adhesives.  In
addition, acetone is an efficient dewatering agent.
However, the flammability of both solvents (note
that acetone has a flash point of 0°F) and their
incompatibility with many structural polymers (e.g.,
stress cracking of polyether sulphone, polyether
ketone, and polycarbonate) mean that they should
only be used with care and in small quantities. It
is important to note that MEK is often  classified
as a hazardous air pollutant, as it is in the  U.S.
Even so, it is extremely widely  used in a variety of
applications.
in a number of applications.  These solvents are
chosen  for  their  high  polarity and  for  their
effective solvent power.  However, certain glyeol
ethers, can cause swelling, cracking, and structural
degradation   of   polymeric  and • elastomeric
materials.   The alcohols have a range of flash
points.  Extreme care must be exercised while
using the lower flash point alcohols  (see Exhibit
20).

As mentioned  earlier, one  method of organic
cleaning involves the use of an alcohol vapor zone
to clean the parts, and a perfluorocarbon vapor
blanket  above the to reduce the flammability risk
of the heated alcohol.  A different class of alcohol
vapor degreasing equipment does not make use of
an  inciting agent such  as perfluorocarbons.
Instead, these  systems  have numerous  safety
devices  built into  the equipment, including air
monitors,  automatic  sprinkler  systems,   and
automatic shutoff capabilities. Nevertheless, when
using both types of equipment, workers  must
exercise extreme caution to reduce  the risk of
explosion.

Esters, such as dibasic esters and aliphatic mono
esters, have good solvent properties. They offer
good  cleaning  for a variety of grimes and soils.
Most esters  are   readily soluble  in   alcohols,
ketones, ethers, and hydrocarbons, but  are only
slightly  soluble in  water and in high  paraffinic
hydrocarbons. Dibasic esters generally have a high
flash point and low vapor pressure. In fact, dibasic
esters are so low in vapor pressure that a residual
film may remain on a surface after  application,
thereby necessitating a water rinse stage.  Aliphatic
esters, generally acetates, range in formula from
ethyl acetate to tridecyl acetate. The higher grades
(hexyl acetate and heavier) art commonly used in
degreasing.  They  fall into  the combustible or
noncombustible flash point  range,  and  have
acceptable  compatibility with  most polymers.
These esters can be dried from a surface by forced
air drying with  no lesidual film.
Alcohols such as ethanol and isopropanol, and
several glyeol ethers are used alone and in blends
Many of the organic solvents are toxic and have
low worker exposure limits. Prior to implementing

-------
80
such products, a plant should coordinate a review
by an occupational health professional to ensure
that the products are being used in a safe manner.
All possible  efforts should  be made to protect
workers  from  prolonged  exposure  to  toxic
chemicals.

Many organic solvent alternatives to CFC-113 and
MCF also have problems with odor.  Even though
volatility  and  airborne  concentrations  can be
reduced, the relatively strong odors of some of
these solvents may build up.  Without adequate
ventilation and possibly masks for workers, these
odors  may  reach a  level which will  cause
discomfort for workers. Therefore, care should be
taken to reduce the odor build-up in any location.

Other issues  to consider when evaluating organic
solvents as CFC-113 and MCF substitutes include
VOC emissions and  waste disposal.  In  many
Ideations, most  of the organic solvents  will be
considered VOCs, and  their  use  will  require
emissions control.  In addition, spent solvent may
be considered hazardous waste. If it  is, the solvent
will require special handling and disposal practices.

-------
                                                                       81
                                 Exhibit 19



                      PROPERTIES OF KETONES
KETONES
ACETONI
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
DiETHYL KETONE
METHYL n-PROPYL KETONE
CYCLOHEXANONE
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
METHYL n-BUTYL KETONE
METHYL CYCLOHEXANONE
(Mixed Isomers)
ACETONYL ACETONE
DIISOPROPYL KETONE
METHYL n-AMYL KETONE
DIACETONE
Formula
CHaCOCH3
CHgCOCgHg
CgHgCQCgHg
CHgCOCaHj

-------
82
                                  Exhibit 20

                      PROPERTIES OF ALCOHOLS
CHEMICAL
Meihanol
Ethanol, Prop. Anhydrous
Ethanol, Spec. Industrial Anhydrous
Isopropanol, Anhydrous
n-Propanol
2-Butano!
Isobutanol
n-Butanol
Amyl Alcohol (primary) .
Methyl Amyl Alcohol
Cyclohexano!
2-Ethylhexanol
Texanol
, Lb./Gal.
60°F
6.60
6.65
6.65
6.55
6.71
6.73
6.68
6.75
6.79
6.72
7.89
6.94
7.90
Sp. Gr.
2Q«I2D°C
0.792
0.799
0.795
0.786
0.806
0.809
0.803 ,
0.811
0.815
0.808
0.949
0.834
0.950
Boiling
Range °F
147-149
165-176
167-178
179-182
205-208
207-215
225-228
241-245
261-282
266-271
320-325
360-367
471-477
Fl. Pt. "F
TCC
54
" 49
50
53
74
72
85
97
120
103
142
164
2482
Evap. Rate1
3.5
1.8
1.8
- 1.7
1.0
0.9
0.6
0.5
0.3
0.3
0.05
0.01
0.002
1 n-Butyl Acetate=1
2 C.O.C.

Source: Southwest Chemical Company, Solvent Properties Reference Manual

-------
                                                                                              83
 OTHER CHLORINATED  SOLVENTS
 One of the most appealing substitutes for CFC-113
 and MCF in terms of process similarity is the use
 of another chlorinated solvent which does not
 contribute  to  ozone-depletion.    The  solvents
 normally  used  in   cleaning applications  are
 trichloroethylene,   perchloroethylene,  and
 methylene chloride.   While these substances, are
 ideal due to the fact that they can be used in vapor
 , degreasing applications, as are CFC-113 and MCF,
 they may have significant health and environmental
 impacts  which, if not properly addressed, make
 their use less attractive.

 These three cleaning solvents have  undergone
 extensive testing in recent years for safety, health,
 and environmental impacts.  As a result of this
 testing, two of the solvents — trichloroethylene and
 perchloroethylene — have been classified as VOCs
 (although the U.S. EPA has recently proposed that
 perchloroethylene be exempted'from regulation as
 a VOC), and  all three  have been classified  as
 hazardous air pollutants  in  the  U.S.  These
 classifications  have  significant implications  for
 chlorinated solvent use  in the U.S.  since they
 require  that  emissions  control  measures  be
 employed  and extensive records  be kept when
 using these solvents.  In November 1993, the U.S.
 EPA proposed national emission  standards  for
• hazardous air pollutants  (NESHAPs)  used  in
 existing  and new haiogenated solvent  cleaning
 applications. The standards, which were developed
 under the requirements of Title III (Hazardous Air
 Pollutants) of the Clean Air Act, cover both vapor
 degreasing   and   immersion   cleaning   with
 trichloroethylene,   perchloroethylene,  and
 methylene chloride, as well as with MCF.  The
 standards are expected to be finalized by November
/1994.    After  that  time,  companies operating
 existing equipment will have two years to comply
 with the requirements.

 Under the proposal,  companies are required  to
 install  emission   control   equipment  and  to
 implement automated parts handling and specified
 work  practices  in   order to  meet  emission
 standards. Alternatively, companies may choose to
 comply with either an idling mode emission limit,
1  in conjunction with parts handling and  work
I  practice  requirements,  or  a  limit  on  total
  emissions.   Exhibit  21  presents  the  proposed
',  control   equipment   combinations  and   the
  alternative  idling limits  for  different types of
  equipment.  Exhibit 22" lists the alternative total
  emissions limits.

>  Within 90 days of the finalization of the standards,
  companies must  submit an initial 'notification of
I  each solvent cleaning machine.  Companies are
i  expected to implement one of the compliance
;  options within two years, and to submit an initial
!  compliance report within 30 days of the end of the
  two-year period.   Cleaning machines that begin
;  operation after the proposal date are expected to
  comply with the standards  upon start-up or on the
  date the standards are finalized, whichever is later.
;  Following the submission of the initial compliance
  report, companies are required to submit annual
  compliance reports.  Noncompliance reports, if
!  necessary, are submitted quarterly.  The operators
;  of batch vapor and in-line vapor and cold cleaning
!  machines are  required  to obtain  an operating
  permit from the EPA or the operator's state, if the
<  state has an EPA-approved permitting program.
  Companies  that .choose  to  comply with the
  alternative emission limit  are required to keep a
i  monthly log of solvent additions and removals, and
•<  to use mass-balance equations to calculate their
!  total emissions. The emissions, based on a three-
|  month rolling average, must be equal or less than
',  the totalemissions limit.

 "In addition to being VOCs and/or hazardous air
  pollutants,   two   of  the  nonozone-depleting
  chlorinated  solvents  have  been  shown  to  be
  carcinogenic  to  animate   in  extensive  toxicity
I  testing.    This  discovery  has prompted  the
  International Agency for Research on Cancer to
1' classify  both perchloroethylene and  methylene
  chloride as  "possibly carcinogenic to humans." In
1  addition, many governments have set  very low
  permissible worker exposure limits for all  three
)  chlorinated solvents. The U.S. Occupational Safety
  and Health Administration (OSHA) has set worker
!  exposure limits at 100 parts per million (ppm) for

-------
84
perchloroethyJene and trichloroethylene, and 500
ppm for methylene chloride. A proposal has been
submitted to lower the permissible exposure limit
(PEL) for methylene chloride to 25 ppm,

Chlorinated solvents are subject to  hazardous
•waste regulations in some areas, including the U.S.
where "they are  covered under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Users
of these solvents must be aware of and comply
with all regulations governing use, storage, and
disposal of these materials.

Despite the many possible  environmental  and
safety effects associated with the use of chlorinated
solvents, they are feasible substitutes for CFC-113
and MCF in precision cleaning provided adequate
control measures are used.  Exhibit 23 summarizes
the solvent properties of these other chlorinated
solvents.
                                        Exhibit 21

               CONTROL EQUIPMENT COMBINATIONS AND
              ALTERNATIVE IDLING  LIMITS UNDER NESHAPs
Cleaner Type (m2 solvent/air
•Interface area)
Batch Vapor ,( 1.21 m2)
In-Une" (Existing)
In-Unec (New)
Batch Cold Cleaning
Control Equipment
Combination Options81**
1. FBR=1.0, FRD, RRD
2. FBR=1.0, BPC, RRD
3. BPC, FRD, RRD
4. CVR, FRD, RRD
1. BPC, FRD RRD
2. BPC, DWL, RRD
3. DWL, FRD, RRD
4. BPC, FRD, SHV
5. BPC, RRD, SHV
6. FBR=1.0, RRD, SHV
7. DWL, RRD, SHV
FBR=1.0, FRD
SHV, FRD
CVR, Water Layer
Alternative Idling Limit
(kg/hr)b
9
0.15
0.15
0.10
0.10
N/A
   ft  FBR - freeboard ratio
      FRD - freeboard refrigeration device
      RRD - reduced room draft
      BPC - biparting cover
      CVR - manual cover
      DWL - dwell '
      SHV - superheated vapor
   b  Compliance with the proposed equipment or idling emission standard also requires automated parts handling
      and work practices
   c  Includes both vapor and cold cleaning equipment

-------
                                                    85
                      Exhibit 22

ALTERNATIVE TOTAL EMISSIONS LIMITS UNDER NESHAPs
           (BASED ON THREE-MONTH ROLLING AVERAGE)

f
Batch Vapor (Existing and New)
In-Line Vapor and Cold Cleaning (Existing)
In-Line Vapor and Cold Cleaning (New)
Batch Cold Cleaning
Average Emission (kg/m2-month)
109.8
1i53.2
§8.5 -
N/A
                      Exhibit 23

       PROPERTIES OF CHLORINATED SOLVENTS
Physical Properties
Ozone Depleting
Potential
* * f
Chemical Formula
Molecular Weight
Boiling Point f C)
Density (g/cm"*)
Surface Tension
(dyne/cm)
Kauri Butanol Value
U.S. OSHA PEL 8 hr.
TWA (ppm)
Flash Point f C)
a- Obtained from HSFA
CFC-113 MCF
0.8 0,12
CClnFOCIFn CH^CCIo
£ £ $ •&
187.38 133.5
47.6 73.8
1.56 1.34

17.3 25.4
31 124
1000 , 350a,
None None
White Paper 1989
Trichloro- Perehloro- -Methylene
ethylene ethylene Chloride
0 0 0
f^^lf^$f^if^>l f*l*"%t /"%/"*! fMml f^"l
wtiwlwwljj V/'ta/^wwIp wnpv'in
131.4 - 1€S.9 84.9
87 - 121 4.0
146 1.62 1.33

29.3 31.3 N/A
130 91' 132
100 100 500b
None None None
b A proposal has been submitted to lower the PEL for methylene chloride to 25 ppm, - ,
Source: UNEP 1991,

!1

-------
86

-------
VOLATILE  METHYL SILOXANES
Volatile methyl siloxanes (VMSs) are relatively
new alternatives to CFC-113 and MCF in precision
and  electronics cleaning.   They  remove most
surface contaminants in precision metal working
and optics processing, as well as most nonionic
soils in electronics processing.

VMSs are low molecular weight silicone fluids that
occur in both linear and cyclic form. Commercially
available formulations are often made up of blends
of several different VMS  fluids.  VMSs have been
used for many years as ingredients in cosmetics and
a variety of personal care products, but have not
been  traditionally  used in  solvent  cleaning
applications.

The primary benefits associated with the use of
VMSs in cleaning applications include:

*  Good  cleaning capabilities  for a  variety  of
   contaminants,  including oils, greases, cutting
   fluids, silicone fluids, and waxes (when heated);

*  Ability to evaporate without leaving a residue;

«  Low surface tension allows VMSs,  like CFC-
   113, to spread  rapidly and penetrate tightly-
   spaced 'areas;

•  Compatibility with a wide.variety of substrates,
   including most plastics and elastomers;

•  Easily recoverable and reusable.   VMSs  are
   recycled  by  distillation  and/or  filtration,
   depending on the contaminants present;

*  No rinsing is needed,  thereby eliminating any
   wastewater concerns.

The major drawbacks associated with  the use of
VMSs in precision cleaning include: *,

•  Flammability. The most flammable VMS blend
   currently available has  a flash point of 30°F-and
   is classified as flammable.  The least  flammable
   blend has a flash point  of 135°F and is classified
   as combustible.
-  Longer drying tunes than CFC-113 and MCF.
   The evaporation  rates  of  VMS  blends  are
   comparable to that of butyl acetate.

*  Some constituents of VMS blends have very low
   recommended ecposure limits on the order of
   10 ppm. Overall toxia'ty testing on VMS blends
   is not yet complete.

The VMS blends used in cleaning are pure distilled
methyl polysiloxanes that contain no additives and
are clear in color. Because VMSs have low Kauri-
Butanol values, they are excellent solvents for
surface soils such as oils, greases, cutting fluids,
silicone fluids, yet harmless on most elastomers
and plastics. t Exhibit 24 presents the properties of
three VMS blends as compared to CFC-113 and
MCF. Exhibits 25 and 26 list the compatibility of
VMS fluids with certain elastomers and plastics.

VMSs are used as cleaning and rinsing  agents.
The most volatile VMS blend can also function as
a drying agent.  Parts rinsed with  this blend will
dry in less than one minute at room temperature.
Less volatile  VMS blends take longer to  dry.
Moderate heat may be applied to speed  up the
drying process.

VMSs can be used in existing cleaning equipment
that is designed to safely  handle flammable  or
combustible liquids. For example, equipment that
uses isopropyl alcohol can  be  easily adapted for
use with  VMS fluids.  In addition, CFC-113  or
MCF vapor degreasers can  be modified for VMS
use. Mechanical agitation  or ultrasonics  can be
added to  enhance or speed the cleaning process.

-------
88
                           Exhibit 24
            PROPERTIES OF SAMPLE VMS BLENDS

Molecular Weight
Flash Point («F)
Freezing Point fC)
Boiling Point (°C)
Evaporation Rale
(butyl acetate - 1.0)
Viscosity at 25*C
Specific Gravity at 25" C
Surface Tension at 25° C
(dynes/cm)
Heat of Vaporization at
1*50*F (cal/gm)
Kaurl-Butanol Value
CFC-113
187
none
-35
47
17
0.68
t.56
17.3
35
31
MCF
133 '
none
-37
74
6
0.79
1.31
25.5
56.7
124.8
VMS Blend 1
162
30
-68
100
3
0.65
0.76
15.9
46
16.6
VMS Blend 2
236
94
-86
149
1
1.0
0.82
16
44
15.1
VMS Blend 3
310
135
-76
, 192
0.1
1.5
0.85
18
36
13.4
                           Exhibit 25

  COMPATIBILITY OF SAMPLE VMS BLENDS WITH ELASTOMERS
                  1 weekJmmersion at 50°C (percent swell)
Polymer
AcrylonitrilB-Butadiene
Chtorosutfonated
Potyethylene
EPDM Rubber
Fluoroelastomer

Isobutylene-lsoprene
Natural Polyisoprene
Polychloroprene
Polyslloxane
Common Name
Buna N
Hypalon
Nordel
VitonA
VitonB
Butyl Rubber
Natural Rubber
Neoprene
Silicone
VMS Blend
1
8.1
2.4
-3.9
-1.7
-1.2
3.5
16.0
58.5
-7.1
VMS Blend
2
0
-1.8
-6.6
0
-1.2
-5.8
11.5
' 56.9
-8.3
VMS Blend
3
.4
-1.9
-8.6
0
" 0
-4.0
4.9
53.9
-8.3

-------
                                                          89
                        Exhibit 26
                            i

COMPATIBILITY OF SAMPLE VMS BLENDS WITH PLASTICS
            1 day immersion at 50°C (percent weight change)
Polymer
Nylon
Acrylic »
Potysulphone
PET
Polycarbonate
Polyvinyl Chloride
Acetal
ABS
Polypropylene
PBT
Potyelherimide
PVDF
Polystyrene
Chlorinated Polyvinyl
Chloride
PTFE
fonomer
Acrylic Clear
High Impact Polystyrene
Polycarbonate B
Polypro
PVC
Nylon B
WHMW Polyethylene "
HPDE
• VMS Blend 1
-0.5 ;
-0.2 !
•0.1 :
0
-0.1 I
-0.1 :
-0.2
-0.3
0.6
-0.3 !
-0.1 !
o i
0.4 '
I
0
i
o i
0.6
-0.2
o
-0.1 !
0.3
-0.1, '<
-0.2 I
0.6
0.2 !
VMS Blend 2
,0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
VMS Blend 3
-0.3 "
-0.1
-0.1
0
-0.1
0
-0.1 ,
-0.1
0.1
-0.1
0
0
0.1
0
0
0
0
0
-0.1
01
0
0.2 '
0.1
-0.6

-------
90

-------
                                                                                         91
 WASTEWATER  MINIMIZATION  AND
 TREATMENT
 Pre-Treatment of Water

 Because the cleanliness of precision components
 rinsed with water is largely determined by the
 quality of the  rinsewater,  a  plant  should
 understand its requirements for water supply and
 quality of water.  For example, plants should
 remember that in some areas, water is in short
 supply and in others areas, the quality of water is
 not suitable for precision cleaning.  Other factors
 to consider regarding water supply, quality,  and
 pre-treatment include:

 •  Water   supply requirements vary  between
    machines and with various recycling schemes;
                                  ;
 «  Water supply requirements range from 0.5 gpm
    to 10 gpm with 3 to 5 gpm being most common.
    Systems that recycle water  require additional
    water only to make up for evaporation;

 •  Pre-treatment of water  may  be required to
    reduce  hardness and suspended participates, or
    to  reduce  machine  maintenance.    Water
    softening can be done with  off-the-shelf water
    softening packages;

 *  Water with hardness greater than four should
    not be  used with saponifiers;

 •  Tap water  costs  less and  wets better  than
    purified deionized water, but can  introduce
    contaminants or  interfere with  the  cleaning
    chemistry;

, •  Highly  deionized water can cause problems.

 Typically,  aqueous and semi-aqueous cleaning use
 tap water and/or deionized water.  If the tap or
 deionized  water is  inadequate for the specific
 application, water treatment may be required.

 The following treatment methods and equipment
 can be used to adjust water quality:
* Mechanical filtration to  remove suspended
  particles;

* Sedimentation (to allow suspended particles to
  settle);

* Coagulation  (to remove fine  particles  in
  colloidal suspension);
                           '         v
• Carbon  filtration  (to adsorb gases,  vapors,
  organic substances, and colloidal solids);

* Bacteria filtration (to remove bacteria and other
  microorganisms);

* Irradiation with ultraviolet light (to. destroy
  bacteria and other microorganisms);

* Water softening (to remove  calcium and
  magnesium);

• Reverse osmosis (to remove dissolved solids,
  colloids, and microorganisms).

Depending on the initial water quality, different
combinations of  the above  units  are used  to
achieve the desired quality level.     _   x
Post-Treatment of Water

In order to meet local, state, or federal regulations,
wastewater generated  from  aqueous  and semi-
aqueous based cleaning processes may  require
pretreatment prior  to discharge  to  a publicly
owned  treatment works (POTW) or the sewer •
system.  The type of treatment technology used
depends primarily on the quality and  quantity of
the wastewater generated.

-------
92
Wastewater Quality

Wastewatef may contain organic contaminants
along  with  dissolved   or  suspended   metals.
Additionally,  when  using  alkaline  cleaners,
wastewater can have a pH that is too high for
discharge to a POTW or sewer.
Organic Matter

Organic matter in the wastewater results from the
removal of oil and grease from the parts being
cleaned and from the chemical constituents of the
cleaners.

Oil and grease are generally considered  a single
type of pollutant. They are not categorized by any
chemical  formula, but  rather as a  semi-liquid
material that may contain fatty acids, fats, soaps,
and other similar materials.  Oily wastewater can
be placed-in to five categories:

» Free oU'. oil which rises rapidly to the surface
  under quiescent conditions;

• Mechanical dispersions: fine oil droplets ranging
  in size  from microns to a few millimeters in
  diameter that are stabilized by electrical charges
  or other forces but not through the influence of
  surface active  agents;

* Chemically stabilized emulsions:   oil  droplets
  similar  to  mechanical  dispersions but  with
  enhanced stability resulting from surface active
  agents at the oil/water interface;

* "Dissolved* oik  truly soluble chemical species
  plus finely divided oil droplets (typically less
  than 5 microns diameter). This form generally
  defies removal by normal physical means;

* Oil-wet  solids:  oil  adhering to the  surface  of
  paniculate material in the wastewater.

Organic matter such as oil and grease create visual
and olfactory problems in the water, interfere with
normal oxygen transfer from air to water, and exert
both a biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and a
chemical oxygen demand (COD).   BOD  is  a
measure of the oxygen consuming characteristics of
organic matter.     COD  measures  the  total
oxidizable carbon in the wastewater.  BOD differs
from COD in that BOD relates to the dissolved
oxygen  in water, while  COD  relates  to  the
chemically bound oxygen  in  the .water.   The
measure of organic matter in  a waste stream is
generally characterized by measuring the BOD and
COD.

Most aqueous and semi-aqueous chemicals used in
their cleaner formulations are biodegradable. The
term "biodegradable" may be misleading, however,
because it may take too  long for them to break
'down  into  their  constituent  • elements  to be
environmentally acceptable.
Metals

Metals can exist either in suspension or solution.
Metals in suspension are chips and fines removed
from the parts being cleaned. Dissolved metals in
aqueous-based  wastewater generally  arise from
metals that are  etched off parts as a result of the
alkalinity of the-solution.
pH

A high pH, or alkaline content, can harm aquatic
life. Aqueous cleaning wastewater generated in the
precision cleaning industry is generally alkaline
(i.e., has a pH greater than 7). In most instances,
the wastewater has a pH ranging from 9 to 12, and
mus.t be neut'ilized prior to discharge to a POTW
or sewer.
Wastewater Minimization

Before considering wastewater treatment options,
a plant should investigate methods to minimize the
amount of wastewater generated from aqueous and
semi-aqueous cleaning processes. One important
step in minimizing wastewater9 is optimizing the
cleaning process.

Optimizing the cleaning process includes:

•  Avoiding unnecessary loading

•  Removing sludge promptly

-------
                                                                                                93
 *  Monitoring the cleaning solution

 •  Maintaining equipment

 *  Designing more efficient process features


 Avoid Unnecessary Loading

 In addition to consuming more of tbe cleaner, an
 excessive amount of loading will  cause the soils
 removed from the parts to interfere with cleaning.
 These  soils can form scale on the heating tubes
 and  reduce heat transfer efficiency.  Excessive
 loading requires regular maintenance and increased
 discharge of wastewater.  -

 When  using alkaline cleaners, alkalinity may be
 unintentionally reduced by'the acidity of the soils
 being removed,  reaction of the alkali with the
 carbon dioxide in the air used for agitation, and
 reaction of the cleaner components with the hard
 water salts. This reduction in alkalinity consumes
, the cleaner and reduces bath  life.  Solutions to
 such problems include using mechanical agitation,
 soft  water,  demineralized  water, or deionized.
 water,  and replacing the used alkaline cleaner
 frequently.


 Remove  Sludge and Soils  Promptly

 Removing sludge and soils promptly from cleaning
 tanks reduces  cleaner use by  increasing the time
 before  the entire tank needs to be cleaned out.

 Alkaline cleaners  are available that allow the
 separation of excess oily soils from the cleaning
 solution. These formulations use surfactants thai
 are  good   detergents  but   poor   emulsifiers.
 Agitation .of the bath keeps  the soils suspended.
 After a period of inactivity (e.g. overnight), the oily
 soils float to the surface and can be skimmed off.
'.Although this method is effective with mineral oil,
 it is less effective with fatty oils.
                                    *
 Similarly, there are also semi-aqueous cleaning
 systems that  have  a hydrocarbon  phase  that
 dissolves the soils but does not dissolve in the
 water phase.  When allowed to stand without
 agitation, this hydrocarbon phase easily separates
 out.
 Monitor Cleaning Solution Routinely

 If solution strengths are analyzed on a routine
 basis, solution strength can be maintained more
 effectively by making small and frequent additions
 rather than a few large ones.  Analyses can  be
 performed by the operator using simple titration
 techniques (for example, the addition of a given
 amount of reagent to a known volume of cleaner
 and indicator can result in a color change).  Full
 scale titration tests may be performed  by  a
 laboratory on a  less frequent basis.  The plant
 should keep an accurate log of all tests and cleaner
 additions.
 Maintain Equipment

 All  equipment should  be regularly maintained.
 Metal tanks that are not fabricated with stainless
 steel should be properly coated with  protective
 finishes. Tanks that hold deionized water should
 be stainless steel or lined with plastic lining in
 order to prevent  rapid  rusting.   Spray nozzles
 should be inspected regularly to avoid clogging.

 Additional  important items to maintain are the
 float valves that supply make-up water.  Leaks in
 these valves can cause dilution of cleaner.   It is
 also  important to  determine. whether plastic
 material used in equipment is compatible with the
 hydrocarbon material used  in  the semi-aqueous
.process.
 Consider Other Process Design
 Features

 Other process design features that can  reduce
 wastewater discharge include:

 « Use of  demineralized water during rinsing, to
   clean  parts that cannot tolerate minor residue.
   This  water reduces  the  amount of  sludge
   generated during wastewater treatment and may
   allow the direct use of rinse water as make-up
   water for the wash tank;

 « Counterflow rinse systems should always  be
  • used to reduce overall water consumption and
   subsequent treatment  requirements;   '

-------
  94
    Fog  nozzles  use  much  less  water  than
    conventional spray systems.
 Wastewater Treatment
 Technologies -

 Wastewater generated  from precision  cleaning
 .processes can have a  wide range of pollutants.
 Therefore, the treatment technologies applied will
 depend on the type of pollutant present and the
 quantity of wastewater being  generated.  The
 wastewater  treatment  equipment and processes
 discussed below are categorized based on the type
 of pollutant being treated.


 Oil and Grease
                                            4
 Gravity Separator. "This treatment technology takes
 _ advantage of the difference in specific gravity
 between water and oil and grease.  Hie process
 involves retaining the oily waste in a holding tank
 and allowing gravity separation of the oily material,
 which  is then  skimmed  from  the  wastewater
 surface. Gravity separators are the most common
 devices employed in waste  treatment to separate
 grease and nonemulsified oils. The technique does
 not always remove very finely divided (colloidal)
 oily or scummy material. The process generates an
 oily dispersion that may have to be treated prior to
 disposal. Relative energy requirements are low.

 In instances where the quantity of wastewater to be
 treated is small, a simple skimmer attached to a
 tank can be used to remove the free floating oils.
 The oil skimmers are either operated continuously
 during cleaning or are operated once a day before
 the cleaning process is started. It should be noted
 that during  the removal of oil,  other suspended
 solids like metal fines and chips are also removed.

»The treatment of wastewater from a semi-aqueous
 cleaning process should not involve the removal of
 gross amounts of oil and grease if a Decanter is
 used with properly designed cleaning equipment.
 The removal of  dissolved  organic material and
 small amounts of suspended oils may be required.

 ULtrafiltration,  Ultrafiltration is a low pressure (10-
 150  psi) membrane process for separating high
 molecular weight emulsified oils and  paniculate
matter less  than 0.2  microns in  diameter from
liquids.      A   semi-permeable   membrane,
incorporated in membrane modules, performs the
separation. The wastewater feed is pumped across
the membrane surface at high velocity.  Water and
low-molecular weight solutes  such as salts and
some surfactants pass through the membrane pores
as permeate.  This solution may bef reused  or
further treated prior to disposal.  Emulsified oil
and  suspended solids  cannot  pass through the
membrane pores and are retained as a'concentrate.

The cross-flow  characteristic of  ultrafiltration
differs from the perpendicular flow of ordinary
filtration,  where "cake" builds  up on  the  filter
surface, requiring frequent filter replacement and
cleaning.  Tangential-flow prevents  filter  cake
buildup, resulting in high filtration rates that can
be .maintained continuously, eliminating the cost
for frequent  membrane cleaning.

Data from aerospace industry investigators indicate
that a ceramic ultrafiltration system can be used to
recover the entire cleaner (builder and surfactant
package) used in aqueous cleaning systems, and
that the efficiency of oil  removal is  best when
using ultrafiltration.  However, the ultrafiltration
process must be specifically tailored to the aqueous
cleaner used in order to prevent excessive loss of
specific components.

The capital cost  of ultrafiltration equipment and
operating   costs   associated   with   pumping
wastewater at high pressure are greater than the
costs of other treatment methods.  Material and
disposal cost savings  can  provide an  acceptable
return on  investment in cases where recycling of
the permeate solution is possible.

Coalescing.  During the coalescence process, oil
droplets wet a coalescing medium.   As the oil
droplets combine to form larger particles, they rise
to the surface of the solution. The most important
properties of the coalescing media are its ability to
absorb  oil   and  its   large   surface    area.
Polypropylene   and  monofilament   line  are
sometimes used  as  coalescing media.  Floating
absorption blankets or pillows are available from
a number of suppliers.  The  active  material is
generally  a  blown polypropylene that is  highly
oleophilic but will not remove active ingredients
from the cleaner.

-------
                                                                                                  95
 Because of its simplicity, coalescing provides high
 reliability and low capital and operating costs.  It
 cannot be used, however, to remove emulsified
 oils; if emulsified oils are present, the wastewater
 must  be pretreated before being  sent to the
 coalescing unit.

 Chemical Treatment.  Chemical treatment is often
 used to break down stable  oil-water emulsions.
 Chemical treatment consists of three steps:  (1)
 coagulation  -  breaking of the emulsion;  (2)
 flocculation  —  agglomeration  of the  tiny oil
 droplets  to  form, larger  droplets;   and  (3)
 sedimentation — the removal of oil from water.

 Coagulants (e.g., polymers, alum, ferric chloride,
 and organic emulsion breakers) break emulsions by
 neutralizing  repulsive charges  between  particles,
 precipitating or salting out emulsifying agents, or
 altering the  interfacial film  between the oil and
 water so it breaks down. After the addition of the
 coagulant, the flocculem is added to bring the tiny
 oil droplets together to form larger oil drops, so
 that they can   easily  be  separated from the
 wastewater. Typical flocculents are high molecular
 weight polymers.

 The disadvantage of this process is that chemical
 treatments used  to break the emulsions generate
 sludge that  has to be disposed.   The cost of
 chemicals and sludge disposal can be high.
 Organics

 Organics present in the wastewater from aqueous
 and semi-aqueous  based processes are generated
 from contaminants like the hydrocarbon chemicals
 and surfactants used in the chemical cleaners and
 from the finishing and pigment compounds used in
 the processing of precision components. Although
 oil and grease are organic in nature, they are not
 considered organic pollutants under this definition.
sli  is known  that many organic compounds are
 eliminated  during the treatment steps  for the
 removal of waste oil and grease. Higli molecular
 weight organics are much more soluble in oil than
 in the water and are skimmed off with the removed
 oil.

 Carbon adsorption.   This  system involves passing
 wastewater through a chamber containing activated
 carbon in order to remove the dissolved organic
material from the wastewater.  Carbon adsorption
is one  of the  most efficient organic  removal
processes  available.  In addition, it is reversible,
thus allowing activated carbon to be regenerated by
the application of heat and steam and then reused.

Some general rules regarding carbon adsorption
capacity include:

*  Higher surface area provides greater adsorption
   capacity;

•  Larger  pore size provides  greater adsorption
   capacity;

*  Adsorptiviiy incnsases as the solubility of the
   solute decreases. For hydrocarbons, adsorption
   increases with molecular weight;

*  Adsorption capacity decreases  with increasing
   temperature;

*  For solutes with tonizable groups, maximum
   adsorption is achieved at a pH corresponding to
   the minimum ionization.

The same factors can  also affect  the  rate  of
adsorption.    For .example,  while  adsorption
capacity is greater when removing higher molecular
weight  hydrocarbons, the rate of adsorption is
decreased.  Similarly, while higher temperatures
decrease capacity,  they may increase the rate of
remqval of solute from solution.

Before carbon adsorption is performed, wastewater
should be pretreated to remove excess suspended
solids, oil, and grease.  Suspended solids in the
stream entering the carbon adsorption bed should
be  less than 50  parts  per  million (ppm)  to
minimize backwash requirements.  Oil and pease
should be  less than 10 ppm. High  levels of oil and
grease can block the pores of the activated carbon,
making the carbon ineffective in the adsorption of
organic matter.

Activated  carbon columns are typically placed in
series or parallel in wastewater treatment plants.
A minimum of two columns is generally used in
continuous operation: when the activated carbon
in one column is used up and being regenerated,
the other column removes the contaminants.

-------
96
Carbon adsorption  is an  economical treatment
process.  The greatest cost associated with the
technology is regenerating the activated carbon.
P"

Aqueous cleaning wastewater is alkaline and can
have a pH ranging from 7 to 12, depending upon
the cleaning process and, in particular, on the type
and strength of the chemical cleaner used.  Adding
sulfuric or hydrochloric acid adjusts the pH of
wastewater. The major investment cost associated
with this treatment is the cost of the mixing tank.
The operating costs, which are primarily, the cost
of material, are low.
Dissolved Metals

Precipitation. The most commonly used technique
to treat dissolved  metals consists of hydroxide
precipitation followed by sedimentation. Reagents
used  to effect  the  precipitation include alkaline
compounds such, as lime and sodium hydroxide.
The treatment  chemicals  may be added to a mix
tank  or, if a clarifier or similar device is being
used, directly to the sedimentation device.   The
greatest advantage of using a clarifier is the short
retention  time  it takes for  metal  precipitates to
settle.   However,   the cost of  installing  and
maintaining a clarifier are high. The sludge that is
generated must be  disposed according to federal,
state and social regulations.

The  performance   of hydroxide precipitation
depends on several  variables. The most important
factors affecting precipitation effectiveness are:

•  Addition of sufficient excess hydroxide to drive
   the precipitation reaction to completion;

*  Maintenance of an alkaline pH  throughout the
   precipitation reaction and subsequent settling;

*  Effective removal of precipitation solids.

In some instances flocculating agents are added to
enhance the sedimentation process.
It is important to note that the use of hydroxide
precipitation  produces  sludge  that  must  be
disposed, thus increasing treatment cost.

In Japan, ferrite precipitation is frequently used in
place of hydroxide * precipitation.  It  has the
advantages of precipitating the metals at lower
concentrations  (by a  factor  of about   two).
Furthermore,  a  market already 'exists  for the
precipitates in the technical ceramics industry.  Its
disadvantages are higher operating costs and the
considerable quantities of dissolved iron left in the
effluent water.  Regulations on ferrous and ferric
ions should be investigated.

Ion-Exchange. Ion exchange is used in a number of
wastewater treatment applications, particularly in
water  softening  and  deionization, to  remove
dissolved metals  from solution.   The  process
involves the reversible interchange of ions between
a solid, called the ion-exchange material, and a
liquid so that there is no permanent change in the
structure of the solid. The utility of ion exchange
rests with the ability to reuse the ion-exchange
materials. Eventually, the resin beds will lose their
efficiency and have  to be either regenerated  or
replaced, thereby producing either concentrated
wastewater or a volume of contaminated resin to
be disposed of properly.    For example, in the
wastewater treatment reaction to remove lead  (Pb):

      i
   2 Na+' R + Pb2Hh = Pb2+ R-, + 2 Na+'
The exchanger R in the sodium-ion form is able to •
exchange for lead, and thus, remove lead from the
wastewater  and replace it  with  an equivalent
quantity of sodium. Subsequently, the lead-loaded
resin  may be  treated with  a sodium chloride
solution, which regenerates  the sodium form so
that it is ready for another cycle of operation. The(
regeneration reaction  is reversible and  the ion
exchanger is not permanently changed.  Relative,
energy costs for this system are low.

-------
                                                                                          97
 Conceptual  Design of a
 Wastewater Treatment

 System

 In  most  aqueous and ..semi-aqueous  cleaning
 systems, the wash and rinse water is recycled and
 reused for a certain period of time before being
 discarded.   Because of stringent environmental
 regulations,  high  water costs, 'and high energy
 costs, recycling of wastewater is recommended.
 Exhibit 27 presents a conceptual design of a semi-
- continuous wastewater treatment system that treats
 wastewater  generated  from  precision  cleaning
 industries.

 The system consists of six unit operations. Unit 1
 is a holding tank where the wastewater generated
 is periodically discharged.  Unit 2 is an enhanced
 gravity separator that removes free floating oil and
 suspended solids.  Unit 3 is a ultrafiltration device
 that removes the emulsified-dissolved oils. Unit 4
 is  an ion-exchange  column  used to  remove
 dissolved metals. Unit 5 is an activated carbon bed
 used to remove organic matter.  Unit 6 is a pH
 adjusting  tank.  The final wastewater discharged
 from  this  system,can be either reused as process
 water for an aqueous  or  semi-aqueous cleaning
 process or discharged to the POTW.


 Contract  Hauling of

 Wastewater

 For small users of aqueous and  semi-aqueous
 cleaning processes, it may be more economical to
 contract wastewater treatment rather than treating
 it in-house.   In some cases, the volume of the
 wastewater  can be  reduced to make.it more
 economical for shipment (hauling) by evaporating
 excess water. Most companies that contract haul
 waste generally treat it in large treatment facilities
 such as large wastewater treatment plants or large
 incinerators  where it is burned  as fuel. Waste
 from semi-aqueous processes can be spfuel source
 for incinerators.

-------
'98
Exhibit 27
SEMI-CONTINUOUS WASTEWATER TREATMENT
PROCESS
\
s
So
Wastewaier
Holding
Tank
\
Enhanced
Gravity -f
Separator *-
1
Removal of
Free OH &
uspended Solids
urea: EPA 1989
.
-»^ Membrane r~^. Carbon /-^^ Ion __^ Removal of
^ Filtration "r\ Adsorption "^T Exchange Wsaolved Metals
* * ^
Dissohdd- Organies u"61,1^ ,
Emulsified Oil . , pH Adjusting _QJVxW WaJte
Tank £lvp^ Treatment
? Facility
Reuse as
Process Water
H9081-1

-------
                                                                             99
SUMMARY AND REVIEW
The manual has described the necessary steps to develop a program to eliminate the use of
CFC-113 and MQF in precision cleaning operations. In doing so, it has:
      Summarized  the  reasons  for  the precision  cleaning  industry's  historical
      dependence on CFC-113 and MOP;                   ,;

      Outlined the steps necessary to characterize existing manufacturing processes and
      precision cleaning needs;

      Detailed the key organizational, technical, economic, and environmental criteria
      to consider when developing a phaseout program;

      Discussed the many new alternative cleaning processes and solvents for precision
      cleaning,  and  summarized their  operational  principles,  advantages  and
      disadvantages;

      Presented methods and options to minimize wastewater from the use of aqueous
      and semi-aqueous cleaning processes.
The next section presents some case studies that provide examples of successful programs
on alternatives being implemented in industry. The case studies are followed by references
and a list of vendors that may serve as an additional source of information.

-------
100

-------
                                                                  101
CASE  STUDIES  OF INDUSTRIAL PRACTICES
The following section presents case studies of industrial experiences of some of the
alternative technologies discussed earlier.    ,
                                   i
Mention of any company or product in this document is for informational purposes only and
does not constitute a recommendation of any such company or product, either express or
implied by EPA or ICOLP, ICOLP committee members, and the companies that employ the
ICOLP committee members.
     Case Study #1: Aqueous Process for Cleaning Disk Drives.

     Case Study #2: Alcohol with Perfluorocarbon Process for Cleaning Various
     Precision Components.

     Case Study #3: Aqueous Process for Cleaning Inertial System Parts.

-------
102

-------
                                                                                        103
CASE STUDY #\\
AQUEOUS PROCESS
FOR  CLEANING DISK
DRIVES
consumption beyoitd that of the Phase I effort.
Phase II addresses longer lead time and higher cost
solutions. In this phase, Digital has implemented
carbon adsorption columns, closed or nearly-closed
systems,  balloon  accumulators,   and  other
conservation devices.
Case study #1 describes the work conducted by
Digital Equipment Corporation (Digital) at its
Colorado Springs Facility, to significantly reduce
CFC-113 use and to identify alternative solvents.
Introduction

Digital designs and manufactures a variety of disk
drives and controllers.  The products range from 5
1/4" to 14" disks, from a few hundred megabytes to
more than 1.5 gigabytes per spindle.

Disk  drives are  manufactured  in  cleanroom
environments. The electromechanical components
require  precision  cleaning  from particles  to
submicron sizes and from ionic and organic film
residues.

Digital previously  used CFC-113 extensively  for
precision cleaning of components. In 1987, Digital
adopted an overlapping, three-phased approach to
reduce and eventually eliminate CFCs from  its
manufacturing operations. CFC consumption  for
1987 was 62 tons. Early conservation efforts have
led so substantial reductions - to 56 tons ir 1989
and 45 tons in 1990.  Projections for 1991 are 15
to, 20 tons.  The goal is for virtually complete
elimination by the end of 1991.
Phase III -CFC Alternatives
Feasibility Study

Phase III efforts have been targeted to finding a
permanent alternative to ozone-depleting CFCs in
manufacturing operations.  Initial efforts  focused
on an extensive feasibility study.  This part of the
project  involved  literature  searches,  vendor
searches, and  laboratory work with potential
alternatives. Laboratory studies included testing a
variety of organic,  semi-aqueous,  and aqueous
solvent systems for particle removal, film removal,
residues,  and material  compatibility with  the
variety of metal and polymer parts, coatings, and
platings used in disk drive hardware. The decision
was  made to  pursue an  aqueous cleaning
alternative for the bulk of precision cleaning.
Internal Consortium

Digital has several other plants that assemble disk
drives or provide component hardware to be used
in the drives.   The  company  established  a
cooperative effort tiiat allowed better utilization of
funding, knowledge, and resources in a division of
labor.
Phases I and II -- CFC
Reductions

Phase  I  was designed  to achieve immediate
reductions through engineering  enhancements,
process improvements, and  operating discipline.
Phase I efforts  which  have been implemented
successfully, focused on short lead time and low
cost immediate reduction in  CFC emissions.

Phase  II  is  a  strategy during  transition  to
alternatives., It accommodates near and mid-term
efforts  to achieve significant reductions in CFC
Process Design
The initial activity involved the selection of specific
aqueous chemistry for process parameters and then
an optimization of these variables. Primary design'
activities focussed on material compatibility, such
as corrosion of metals and effects on polymers.

-------
 104
 Test Program For Cleaning
 Effectiveness

 Cleaning effectiveness was evaluated using a variety
 of tools.  Optical  microscopy,  a very valuable
 method, can be used to  count and size particles
 down to about one micron.

 Panicles made of a variety of materials such as
 aluminum oxide, stainless steel, nickel, glass, and
 polystyrene latex can be obtained in sizes from
 submicron to several  tens  of  microns.  These
 particles were used to artificially contaminate test
 coupons.  Coupons were cut  from disk  drive-
 materials, providing the same surface material and
 structure as actual  production hardware.   Hie
 panicles were counted and sized to obtain initial
 frequency distributions either manually with a
 microscope or by using image analysis equipment.
 The  contaminated  parts were  subjected to the
 treatment  combination  of  fractional * factorial
 experiments, and the effectiveness of the various
 combinations evaluated.

 Similar testing was conducted using chemical film
 contamination where hydrocarbon oils and ionic
 contamination were used to contaminate the parts.
 Measurement can  be conducted using optical
 microscopy   or  surface   energy   measurements
 (contact angle) or by more sophisticated methods
 such as X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS).
dispersive x-ray spectrometer), and XPS.  Metals
were  tested  for  corrosion  by  acceleration  in
environmental  chambers.      Plastics  were
mechanically and  environmentally stressed and
cycled  tq evaluate the effects of surfactants on
specific polymers.
Implementation

Digital is-adopting an aqueous cleaning alternative*
for  the majority  of  the  precision  cleaning
requirements for disk drive cleaning. Based on the
testing described above, a synthetic detergent blend
of nonionic and anionic surfactants with additives
(such as builders, inhibitors, dispersing agents,
buffers,  and  others) .will  be used  in an ultrasonic
immersion process.

Rinsing will be conducted in three stages:  an
initial high-volume, low-pressure spray; a second,
stage immersion-ultrasonic rinse; and a final high-'
pressure spray rinse. The nozzle used in the sprays
will  be  optimized for pressure,  flow-rate,  spray
pattern, and  other parameters.

Drying  will  be performed  using a  mechanical
dewatering  stage  with high velocity and  high
volume  of filtered air to remove the bulk water,
followed by  evaporative  drying  of  residual
moisture.
Test Program For Rinsing

A Key element of aqueous cleaning is removal of
cleaning chemistry from the parts. Trace residues
of  ionic and,organic  films left behind  can be
detrimental to product function.

Experiments  using contact angle, optical  and
chemical  microscopy,  and XPS are  useful  for
identifying  process residues and  quantities in
'testing optimum methods of rinsing.
Test Program for Material
Compatibility

Material compatibility was tested by evaluation
before and after cleaning using Optical microscopy,
scanning electron microscopy (SEM), EDS (energy

-------
                                                                                      105
CASE  STUDY
ALCOHOL WITH
PERFLUOROCARBON
CLEANING PROCESS
Case study #2 .discusses the work carried out by
British Aerospace (Dynamics) Ltd, (BADL) to
develop two prototype cleaning systems that could
use an alternative solvent and eliminate the use of
CFC-113.
Introduction

BADL designs and manufactures a wide range of
defensive missile  systems  which involves  the
manufacture of many subsystems.  These include
flight and ground equipment, electronics, guidance
equipment, and control systems  - all of which
require the use of CFC-113 as a precision cleaning
agent.

In common with most companies in the aerospace
industry, BADL has set up an extensive Design
Support Laboratory. Other organizations refer to
these groups as Materials and Process Laboratories
(M  + PL).   Their  function  is  varied and is
concerned with the fine tuning of designs which,
among many other factors, includes contamination
and the means of its prevention.
Company Requirements

The following characteristics- of BADL's business
defined the options and alternatives to CFC-113:

• Many of  the manufacturing  activities were
  relatively  small.    No  single,  large,  high-
  throughput plant  existed,  especially in the
  electronics and precision engineering areas.
                               *
• As  a  major  military  contractor, BADL's
  manufacturing contracts often run for  many
  years and thus represent technologies of varying
  dates.  Changes to long-standing  designs to
  enable different cleaning  techniques  to be
  introduced   would   require   expensive
  requalification and would not be supported by
  customers.

  Considerable amounts of CFC-113 were used in
  dewatering processes to give rapid  spot-free
  drying of electronics, small parts, and optics.

  BADL's business is supported by large numbers
  of subcontractor;, many of whom are relatively
  small and use  small  scale batch  cleaning
  methods.

  The bulk of BADiL's CFC-113 applications were
  carried out in superclean, white  room working
  conditions.

  Certain special materials such as beryllium, were
  used in both the sensor manufacture and in the
  space component divisions.    These  would
  require a careful choice of cleaning solvent,
  because of the sensitivity to corrosive attack.
Company Response

Following  the  approach  by one  of BADL's
suppliers of CFC-113, the alcohol/perfluorocarbon
cleaning process was considered as a  useful
alternative to CFC-113 for both- electronics and
small parts cleaning.

The process, which is described in the previous
section, is based on  the principle'of adding a
perfluorocarbon  (PFC)  to  isopropanol  (IPA).
Components are immersed in the  hot alcohol,
cleaned by ultrasonic agitation, and then removed
through  the vapor resulting in a warm,  dry,
alcohol-free product.  Alternatively, parts can be
held within the vapor and spray cleaned with pure
alcohol.

In order to move from  the conceptual phase to
design  and implementation,  BADL  formed  a
cooperative venture with  several partners:   its
supplier of perfluorocarbon, an industrial partner
who  could assist  in the design  of cleaning
equipment and provide the industrial environment
for the realistic evaluation of the process, and an
industrial  partner  with   experience in  the
manufacture of solvent cleaning machines.

-------
 106
Through this cooperative venture, BADLwas able
to design two prototype machines:

**  A printed circuit board (PCB) cleaner; and

•  A general purpose cleaner.

                                       *

PCB  Cleaner

This prototype was designed primarily to clean
PCBs of all types including single sided through-
hole, SMT and hybrids.  The basic principles of the
machine are shown in Exhibit 28. Mixed PFC and
IPA vapor, generated by remote hot water heating
of a PFC/IPA sump (A), volatilizes and the mixed
vapors rise into a cleaning tank (B).  This tank is
closed-by hermetic lid (C).  The vapors condense
on  the cooling  coils  (D),  with the condensate
returning to the .three tanks (El), (E2), and (E3)
each of which contains IPA and PFC. An inner
gauze lid, (F), interconnected to the main lid is
fitted to break up aerosols of alcohol from the
spray, and vapors rising above the cooling coils are
condensed on the refrigerated panel (G).  Air and
vapor displaced by the thermal expansion of the air
in the  cleaning tank  passes via  valves  to the
pressure balancing volume (H) thus preventing loss
of vapors on heat-up and cool-down.

To operate the system, a holder containing the test
circuits is fitted manually and the interlocked Ms-
dosed.  Clean alcohol  is pumped via pneumatic
pump  (J) from  tank  (El) to spray heads (K)
arranged on both sides  of the PCBs; .dirty alcohol
flows back via the appropriate valve to (El).  The
boards can then be rinsed with PFC (also from El)
to remove residues of contaminated alcohol from
the first  cleaning stage. This process of alcohol
and  PFC spray cleaning can be repeated twice
more from  tanks (E2) and (E3), so that the work
pieces are cleaned with successively cleaner solvent.

In common with all vapor degreasing systems, this
PFC  /alcohol  machine is self-cleaning.   The
majority of the solvent distillate returns to  tank
(E3) and the overflow weirs over into (E2) and
(El) and then  into the sump. By this means, the
soil is collected in the sump and tank (E3) always
remains clean. .The working fluid in the  tank is
the alcohol; dirty alcohol can be removed from the
sump and replaced automatically by clean material
pumped into tank (E3). Level sensors detect and
automatically adjust both the PFC and  alcohol
levels throughout the system.
General Purpose Cleaner
                                  *
During the development of the first prototype
machine  results of a  research program  on the
effects of ultrasonic cleaning on microelectronics
was published. This work showed that ultrasonic
cleaning carried out under normal conditions did
not damage electronic components nor sensitize
them to long-term deterioration.

In the design of  the  first prototype, ultrasonic
cleaning was not incorporated because of concerns
about possible long-term damage. However, recent
research has documented that ultrasonics do not
have  damaging impacts  on properly  designed
boards. These results have greatly simplified the
design of the second cleaner.

The second cleaner is also a batch operation with
fully automatic under-lid  handling of components.
Pans are cleaned by an automatically programmed
combination   of  hot  alcohol  immersion  and
ultrasonic cleaning; parts are dried before leaving
the machine with heated PFC.  Clean, dry, warm
components  are presented   at  the  end  of the
sequence. Like the first prototype, this machine is
also fitted with a hermetic lid system to eliminate
solvent loss.

-------
                                             tor
                     Exhibit 28
     DIAGRAM OF FUNCTIONAL PROTOTYPE
      ALCOHOL WITH PER FLUOROCARBON
              CLEANING MACHINE:
                         _ Refrigerated Panel G
                          x  Gauzg ScrBBfi F \j
                                        Hermetic Lid
                                              H
                                           Pressure
                                           Balance
                                           Volume
 Hot Water
  Heater>
                                           To Drain
   DS 625 BBSS 0990
  Source: British Aerospace
C47034-2

-------
108

-------
                                                                                       109
 CASE  STUDY
 AQUEOUS PROCESSES
 FOR CLEANING
 INERTIAL SYSTEM
 PARTS
 Case study #3 details the work carried out at a
 U.S. Air Force Base technical center to identify
 aqueous processes that could replace the use of
 CFC-113 and MCF.
 Introduction

 The Aerospace Guidance and Metrology Center
 (The Center), located at the Newark Air Force
 Base in Ohio, repairs a variety of inertia! guidance
 and navigation systems and related components.
 The repair processes require extensive cleaning to
 remove  contamination  from  parts made of
 aluminum, copper, beryllium,  steel,  and  other
 materials. The contamination includes particulates
 and nonparticulates. Many assemblies have critical
 tolerances that mandate precision cleaning of the
 component parts before reassembly.  The critical
 tolerances of some devices are such that paniculate
 contamination as small as O.S microns can cause
 the device to fail.

 Traditionally, CFC-113 and MCF have been the
 solvents most frequently used to meet The Center's
 stringent cleaning requirements. Prior to 1989, the
 Center purchased over 600,000 pounds of CFC-113
 annually.   The policy of  The  Center  is to
 completely eliminate the use of CFC-113 and MCF
 for cleaning by the end of 1995.

 Several cleaning procedures previously based on
 CFC-113 and/or MCF were changed to  aqueous
'processes in  late 1989 and early 1990.   This
 conversion has  resulted in many .benefits in
 addition to  reduced solvent  use.  * Work  is
 continuing to extend the use of aqueous processes
 throughout The Center's cleaning operations as a
 major  contribution to achieving  the goal  in its
 military policy.  '
Aqueous Process as an

Alternative

Aqueous cleaning was considered as an attractive
alternative to CFC-113 and MCF for  several
reasons.  First, The Center already possessed a
sophisticated ultrasonic cleaning device specifically
designed to use water and biodegradable detergents
for cleaning metal parts. The Center's engineers
believed that many of .the parts that were being
cleaned with CFC-113  and/or  MCF  could be
precision cleaned in the  ultrasonic cleaner.
                         i
Another reason involved perceived "difficulties in
obtaining approval to change processes.  Since any
procedural  change   in the  repair  practices
performed by The Center must be approved by the
appropriate military office, it is normally difficult
to make changes.  One such office, however, had
originally  required aqueous cleaning but  subse-
quently authorized CFC-113 and MCF to be used
instead. Therefore, The  Center expected that they
would be willing to approve aqueous cleaning if it
were demonstrated to clean equal to or better than
the CFC-113/MCF based processes. It was felt this
should provide a basis for approaching other
military offices to permit changes.

Finally, the aqueous processes using biodegradable
detergents were attractive because of their relative
low cost, their availability, and their nonhazardous
nature.
Testing  and  Implementation

of Aqueous Procedures

Teams were formed to investigate and develop an
acceptable aqueous process for each cleaning
operation selected as a candidate for conversion
from CFC-113 or MCF.  The team members were
from  engineering,   production,  and  quality
assurance sections. The team concept proved to be
very effective.  One reason for this was that the
cross feed of ideas contributed significantly to the
solution of many of the original (and inevitable)
problems encountered.   In addition,  the  new
processes were readily accepted when they were
subsequently approved for implementation because
all the participating sections had been involved in
the design stage.

-------
 110
The teams experimented until they were able to fit
an aqueous cleaning  process  .to the  specific
procedure being examined. For the experiment to
be a success, it had to produce results that were at
least as good  as the CFC-113 or MCF  based
process.  These experiments proved  that high
quality deionized water was essential to the success
of the aqueous process.  The many other factors
that came into play included: process development
of proper  techniques  for  drying  the  parts,
development of a procedure to bag the parts after
cleaning to  ensure cleanliness during travel from
the   cleaning  site   to  the  reassembly  site,
•development  of  fixtures  to  permit  proper
orientation  of the parts within  the  ultrasonic
cleaning chamber, and controls  to prevent  the
effects of electrostatic charge in the cleaning area
from causing recontamination of the cleaned parts.

Extensive testing and evaluation were performed to
convince the team itself and local management that
the new process should be substituted for the old.
The thoroughness of the testing and evaluation
proved adequate to convince the military office to
approve the process changes.

Personnel from the physical science laboratory at
The Center were instrumental in determining  the
effects  of aqueous  cleaning and in  providing
documentation.  A variety of tests were used to
evaluate the cleanliness achieved from the aqueous
procedures and, also, to determine if the part was
damaged by the procedure, either chemically or
metallurgically. Testing had to be tailored to  the
geometry and composition of the parts involved.
It included, as applicable, optical  microscopy,
scanning  electron microscopy,  panicle  counts,
water   break   tests, • and   other  techniques.
Functional tests were also used on some parts as
•an indicator to 'determine if the parts were clean
and damage free. Once it was determined that a
part could be successfully cleaned with an aqueous
process, the part was subjected to a cleaning time ,
in  the   ultrasonic   environment  that  would
approximate the expected cumulative cleaning time'
of the part's life.  This test was  to ensure that no
damage would be experienced as a result of  the
new cleaning process during, the life of the part.

The lab also conducted controlled tests with a
variety of metals common to The tenter's parts
and   a   variety  of  commercially  available
biodegradable detergents to determine the amount
 of metal that would be removed through exposure
 to each detergent.  This information was used to
 select an  appropriate detergent for application
 where minimum metal removal was desired.  •
 Results

 To date, eight cleaning operations that previously
 used CFC-113 and/or MCF have been successfully
 convened  to  aqueous  processes  using  the
 ultrasonic cleaner; no CFC-113, MCF, or other
 solvents are now used in these operations.  The
 aqueous processes are sophisticated and require
 technician care to insure that parameters such as
 deionized   water  quality,  water  temperature,
 vacuum oven drying time, and temperature are
 maintained.

 Benefits from the conversion  include  not only
 decreased solvent usage, but also improved yields,
, reduced process time, and reduced exposure of the
 technicians to hazardous chemicals.
 Future Plans

 The  results  of  its experience  with  aqueous
 processes has encouraged The Center to continue
 convening CFC-113 and MCF based processes to
 aqueous  processes.   However,  not all  future
 conversions will be centered around the specific
 ultrasonic cleaner used with the original process
 conversions.  Additional testing in The Center's
 laboratory has produced successful results using
 aqueous processes involving water spray booths,
 conventional   ultrasonic  cleaners,  and   other
 equipment.   The  Center  has learned  that  the
 process must  be tailored to the specific cleaning
 operation to obtain the least expensive and most
 practical   solution   that   meets   the  process
 requirements.

-------
                                                                                                 111
                                              REFERENCES
*-        Baran, V. Yu, A.M. Ovsyankin, V.V. Ushakov, and G.M. Franchuk. 1986.  Cleaning metal surfaces with
         electroaerodynamic aerosol jets.                   ;

*        Benzing Technologies. 1987 (May). Plasma cleaning of LPCVD tubes.  Solid State Technology: 81-83.

         Braker, W. and A. Mossman. 1980. ttfatheson Gas Data Book.

         Burow, Richard F.   1993.   Volatile methyl siloxanes (VMS)  as replacements for CFCs and  methyl
         chloroform in precision and electronics cleaning. 1993 CFC and Halon Alternatives Conference; 654-661.

         Chrastil, J.  1982.  Solubility of solids and liquids in supercritical gases. Journal of Physical Chemistry
         86: 3016-3021.
                       <<                                 >
         Cohen, L.E., and J.A. Hook. 1987 (February).  Corrosion of anodized aluminum by alkaline cleaners:
         causes and cures. Plating and Surface Finishing: 73-76.

         Cohen, R.S.  1984 (May 2).  High pressure equipment selection and capital cost considerations in the
         design of supercritical extraction, pilot plants, and  commercial units.  Presented at the American Oil
         Chemist Society. Dallas, TX.                      ;

         Crutcher, E. R. 1986 (May 9). Analysis of paniculate contaminants: microscopical methods.  Presented
         at the technical meeting of the IES. Dallas, TX.
                                                         i
         Daufln, G., J.P. Labbe, and J. Pagetti. 1977. Corrosion inhibition of an alumirium-sillcon-magnesium alloy
         in alkaline media. Corrosion Science 17: 901-912.

         Deguchi, T.J., Q.R. Sasaki and R.J. Champetier. 1986. Oxygen ion cleaning of organic contaminant films.
         Stray Radiation V. SPIE 675: 287-294.

         Deguchi, T.J., and C.B. Kalem. 1987.  Oxygen ion cleaning of organic contaminant films. Optical System
         Contamination: Effects, Measurement, Control.  SPIE 777: 333-338.

         Gahrs, H.J.  1985.  High pressure extraction - increase of range of application by use of multicomponent
         gaseous solvents.   Ger. Chemical Engineering 8:1-7.

    ,    Hoyer, G.G.  1985 (July). Extraction with supercritical fluids:  why, how, and so what.  Chemtech.

         Hughes Aircraft Company.  1993. Eliminate CFC  cleaning with Eco-Snow™ (a presentation of the
         •company's CO2 snow cleaning product).            i                            ,

         Jackson, D.P. 1987 (May 15).  Dense phase carbon dioxide cleaning process.  Presented at the Tenth
         Contamination Control Working Group Meeting.  Danvers; MA.

         Jansen,  G. and J. Tervoort  1984 (November).  Longer bath life in alkaline cleaning.  Product Finishing
         : 6-10.                           -               !        •         ,

-------
  112	

  Koretskie, A.F., A.V. Smlmova, V.A. Kolosanova, and TA Koretskaya. Detergency of nonionic surfactants,,
  pp. 935-940.

  Listen, T. 1986. Plasma cleaning and surface treatment of hybrids to improve bonding.  Proceedings of
  Circuit Expo'86. pages 41-43,

  Mason,  C. W.  1986 (May 9).  Handbook of Chemical Microscopy.  Volume I.  4th  Edition.  Wiley
  Irrterscience Sciences Technical Meeting, Dallas, "DC,

  McCrone, W. C.  1972 (December).  Detection and measurement with the  microscope.  American
  Laboratory.                                                           .   •        •

  McCrone, W.C. and J. Delly.  1973.  The Particle Mas,  Volume I. Ann Arbor Science Publications.

  American Society for Metals.  1964.  Metals Handbook. Volume 2. pages 317-325.

  American Society for Metals.  Surface cleaning, furnishing and coating, in Metal Handbook. 9th Edition.
  Volume St,

  Motyl, K.M.  1988.  Cleaning metal substrates using liquid/supercritical fluid carbon dioxide.   Rockwell
  International Paper RFP-4150.

  O'Kane, D.F.,  and K.L Mittal.  1974.  Plasma cleaning of metal surfaces. J.Vac. Sci. Technol. 11:3 567
  569,

  Paquln, Don.  1994 (March). The gas plasma alternative to wet cleaning. Precision Cleaning: 45-48. -

  Risotto, Stephen. 1994 (March).  Regulatory watch: Summary of EPA's proposed NESHAPs for solvent
  cleaning. 'Precision Cleaning: 50.

  Rose, P.W., and S.L Kaplan.  1985.  Plasma  treatment of plastics.  Branson International Plasma
  Corporation Paper.

  Schrantz, J.  1990.  Rinsing - a key part of pretreatment. Industrial Finishing :  24-29.

  Sclslowski, S.  1990 (February).  Cleaning basics part 2 - soils. Metal Finishing :43-46.

  Shlng, K.S., and S.T. Chung.  1987. Computer simulation methods for the calculation of solubility in
  supercritical extraction systems.  Physical Chemistry 91:1674-1681.

  Sllnn, D.S.L, and B.H.  Baxter. 1987. Alcohol cleaning under a non-flammable perfluorocarbon vapor
  blanket.  ISC Chemicals Publication,  pages 1810-1819.

 jStemniski, J.R., and R.L King, Jr.   1980 (June  24-25).  Ultraviolet cleaning: an alternative to solvent
*  cleaning.  Presented at Adhesives for Industry.  El Segundo, CA.                  '

  UNEP (1989), "Electronics Cleaning, Degreasing,  and Dry Cleaning: Solvents Technical Options Report."
  UNEP Solvents Technical Options Committee.

  U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency.  1989 (December).  Technical assessment of aqueous and
  hydrocarbon/surfactant based cleaning processes in the electronics,  precision instruments,  and metal
  cleaning industries - Draft Report.  Office of Toxic Substances.  Washington, D.C.

-------
                                                	113

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1990 (March). Manual of practices to reduce and eliminate CFC-
113 use In the electronics industry.  Office of Air and Radiation. EPA 400/3-90-003. Washington, D.C.

Vig, J.R.  1986.  UV/ozone cleaning of surfaces. U.S. Army Laboratory Technical Report SLCET-TR-86-6.

Vig, J.R.  1987. UV/ozone cleaning of surfaces, in Treatise on Clean Surface Technology, Volume One
edited by K.L Mittal.  New York: Plenum Press.     .

Williams, D.F. 1981. Extraction with supercritical gases. Chemical Engineering Science 36:111769-1788.

Wright, B.W., and  R.D. Smith, 1986. Investigation of polar modifiers in carbon dioxide mobile phases for
capillary supercritical fluid chromotagraphy. Journal of Chromatography 385: 367-373.

-------
114

-------
                                                                                               115
                                         GLOSSARY
 Adsorption — Not to be confused with absorption. Adsorption is a surface phenomenon which some products
 can exhibit, whereby they can form a physicochemical bond with many substances.
                                     '            i_
 Aerosol spray — A means of atomizing liquids by propelling them from a pressurized container by a soluble
 ps.  Apart from the fact that CFC gases can be used as  the propellant, CFC-113 mixtures may be the
 propelled liquid.                                 I

 Alcohols — A  series of hydrocarbon derivatives with at least one hydrogen atom replaced by an -OH group.
 The simplest alcohols (methanol, ethanol, n-propanol, and isopropanol) are good solvents for some organic
 soils, notably rosin, but are flammable and can form explosive mixtures with air:  their use requires caution
 and well-designed equipment.

 Aqueous cleaning - Cleaning parts with water to whiclit may be added suitable: detergents, saponifiers or other
 additives.
                                                 i

 Azeotrope — A mixture of chemicals is azeotropic if the vapor composition is identical to that of the liquid
 phase. This means that the distillate of an azeotrope is theoretically identical to the solvents from which it
 is distilled. In practice, the presence of contaminants in the solvent slightly upsets the azeotropy.

 Biodegradable — Products in wastewater are classed as biodegradable if they can be easily broken down or
 digested by, for example, sewage treatment.                   '
                                                 i
 BOD ~ An abbreviation for biochemical oxygen demand.
                                                 E
 CFC — An abbreviation for chlorofluorocarbon.     i

 CFC-113 - A common designation for the most popular CFC solvent, l,l,2-trichloro-l,2,2-trifluoroethane,
 with an ODP of approximately 0.8.                 -

 Chlorocarbon — An organic chemical composed of chlorine and carbon, e.g., tarbon tetrachloride.

 Chelation — is the solubilization of a metal salt by forming a chemical complex or sequestering. One way of
 doing this is with ethylenediaminetetra-acetic acid (EDTA) salts which have a multi-dentate spiralligand form
 that can surround metallic and other ions.          i

 Chlorofluorocarbon — An organic chemical composed of chlorine,  fluorine and carbon  atoms, usually
 characterized by high stability contributing to a high ODP.
                                                 I
 COD - An abbreviation for chemical oxygen demand.

 Defluxing  — The removal of flux residues after a soldering operation.  Defluxing is a part of most high-
. reliability electronics production.    *
                                                 i  '
 Detergent — A product designed to render, for example, oik and greases soluble in water, usually made from
 synthetic surfactants.

 Flux — An essential chemical employed in the soldering process to facilitate the production of a solder joint.
 It is usually a  liquid or solid material,  frequently based on rosin (colophony).

-------
116	   	__	'•

Greenhouse effect -- A thermodynamic effect whereby energy absorbed at the earth's surface, which is normally
able to radiate back out to space in the form of long-wave infrared radiation, is retained by gases in the
atmosphere, causing a rise in temperature. The gases in question are partially natural, but man-made pollution
is thought to increasingly contribute to the effect. The same CFCs that cause ozone depletion are known to
be "greenhouse gases", with a single CFC molecule having the same estimated effect as 10,000 carbon dioxide
molecules.

HCFC — An abbreviation for hydrochlorofluorocarbon.

Hydrocarbon — An organic chemical  composed  only  of hydrogen  and carbon.   Gaseous or  volatile
hydrocarbons are flammable.

Hydrocarbon derivative — An organic hydrocarbon whose molecule has been modified by adding atoms other
than hydrogen and carbon, e.g., alcohols.

Hydrocarbon/surfactant blend — A mixture of low-volatile hydrocarbon solvents with surfactants, allowing the
use of a two-phase cleaning process. The first phase is solvent cleaning in the blend and the second phase is
water cleaning to remove the residues of the blend and any other water-soluble soils. The surfactant ensures
the water-solubility of the otherwise insoluble hydrocarbon.  Terpenes are often used in this application.

Hydrochlorocarbon — An organic chemical composed of hydrogen, chlorine and carbon, e.g., trichloroethylene.

Hydrochlorofluorocarbon — An organic chemical composed of hydrogen, chlorine, fluorine and carbon atoms.
These chemicals are less stable than pure CFCs, thereby having generally lower ODPs.

Metal cleaning — General cleaning or degreasing of metallic components or assemblies, without specific quality
requirements or with low ones.

Methyl chloroform — See 1,1,1-trichloroethane.

ODP - An abbreviation for ozone depletion potential.

Ozone — A gas formed when oxygen is  ionized by, for example, the action of ultraviolet light or a strong
electric field.  It has the property of blocking the passage of dangerous wavelengths of r'traviolet light.
Whereas it is a desirable gas in the stratosphere, it is toxic to living organisms at ground level (see volatile
organic compound).

Ozone depletion — Accelerated chemical destruction of the stratospheric ozone layer by the presence of
substances produced, for the most part, by human activities.  The most depleting species for the ozone layer
are the chlorine and bromine free  radicals generated front relatively stable  chlorinated, fluorinated, and
brominated products by ultraviolet radiation.

Ozone depletion potential — A relative index indicating the extent to which a chemical product may cause
ozone depletion. The reference level of  1 is the potential of CFC-11 and CFC-12 to cayse ozone depletion;
If a product has an ozone depletion potential of 0.5, a given weight of the product in the atmosphere would,
in time, deplete half the ccone that thc,same weight of CFC-11 would deplete. The ozone depletion potentials
are calculated from mathematical models which take into account factors such as the stability of the product,
the rate of diffusion, the quantity of depleting atoms per molecule, and the effect of ultraviolet light and other
radiation on the molecules.

Ozone layer — A layer in the stratosphere, at an altitude of approximately 10-50 km, where a relatively strong
concentration of ozone shields the earth from excessive ultraviolet radiation.

-------
                                                                                            ,   117
                       ""                          i                             .           -
Pentafluoropropanol ~ A fluorinated alcohol.       *,    ,                        ,

Perchloroethylene - A perhaiogenated chlorocarbon solvent used extensively ;in industrial degreasing and for
dry cleaning.

Precision cleaning - Though not a perfect definition, this term refers to the cleaning of high-precision
mechanical parts and electronic sensory devices, as opposed to general metal cleaning.  This is usually done
under controlled atmospheres, notably in "clean-rooms* with low paniculate contamination.
                                                  f              /                              *
Printed circuit -- A printed circuit is an electronic component designed for interconnecting the other
components. It usually consists of a metallic conductor pattern on an organic insulating substrate.  After
fabrication, it is known as a printed circuit board (PCB); after assembly where components are added, it is
known as a printed wiring assembfy (PWA).

Saponifier — A chemical designed to react with organic fatty acids, such as rosin, some oils and greases etc.,
in order to form a water-soluble soap.  This is a solvent-free  method of defluxmg and degreasing many parts.
Saponifiers are usually alkaline and may be mineral (based on sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide) or
organic (based on water solutions of monoethanolamine).

Solvent — Although not a strictly correct definition, in this context a product (aqueous or organic) designed
to clean a component or assembly by dissolving the contaminants present on its surface.

Solvent containment — Means of preventing or  reducing the emission of  CFC or other solvents into the
environment. This technique usually involves improving the design of the equipment in which the solvent is
used and preventing losses.       '

Surfactant — A product designed to reduce the surface tension  of water.  Also referred to as tensio-active
agents/tensides.  Detergents are made  up  principally from surfactants.

Terpene ~ Any of many homocyclic hydrocarbons with the empirical formula C10HW, characteristic odor.
Turpentine is mainly a mixture of terpenes. See  hydrocarbon/surfactant blends.

1,1,1-trichloroethane — A hydrochlorocarbon solvent with an estimated OOP of 0.1. Also known as methyl
chloroform.

Vapor phase cleaning — A cleaning process, usually with CFC-113 solvent or hydrochlorocarbon solvents,
where the final rinse of the parts being cleaned is achieved by condensing solvent vapors on the parts.

Volatile organic compound (VOC) — These are constituents, that will evaporate at their temperature of use
and which, by a photochemical reaction, will cause atmospheric oxygen to be converted into potential smog-
promoting tropospheric ozone under favorable climatic conditions.

-------
118

-------
                                                                                          119
                                      APPENDIX A
                                               i

                         INTERNATIONAL COOPERATIVE
                        FOR  OZONE  LAYER  PROTECTION
The International Cooperative for Ozone Layer
Protection (ICOLP), was formed  lay a group of
industries to protect the ozone layer. The primary
role of ICOLP is to coordinate the exchange of
non-proprietary   information   on   alternative
technologies,   substances,  and   processes  to
eliminate ozone-depleting solvents.  By working
closely with solvent users, suppliers, and other
interested organizations worldwide, ICOLP seeks
the widest  and most effective dissemination of
information  harnessed  through  its  member
companies and other sources.
   ICOLP corporate members include:

       AT&T
       British Aerospace Defense
       Ford Motor Company
      'Hitachi
       Honeywell
       IBM Corporation
       Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
       Motorola Corporation
       Ontario Hydro
       Northern Telecom
       Texas Instruments
       Toshiba Corporation
In addition, ICOLP has a  number of industry
association and government organization affiliates.
Industry association affiliates include  American
Electronics Association,  Association   Pour  la
Research  et  Development  des  Methodes  et
Processus  Industriels, CANACINTRA (Mexico),
Center for Global Change, Electronic  Industries
Association,  Halogenated   Solvents   Industry
Alliance (U.S.), Industrial Technology Research
Institute of Taiwan, Japan Electrical Manufacturers
Association, Korea Anti-Pollution Movement, and
.Korea Specialty Chemical Industry Association.
 Government and NGO affiliates include the City
 of Irvine (CA), National Academy of Engineering,
 Research Triangle Institute, Russian Institute of
 Applied  Chemistry,   Russian   Ministry   of
 Environmental Protection and Natural Resources,
 Swedish  National  Environmental  Protection
 Agency, Technology Development Foundation of
 Turkey,  Turkish Ministry of the  Environment,-
 United Nations Environment Programme, U.S. Air
 Force, and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
 (EPA).  The American Electronics Association,
 Electronic Industries Association, City  of Irvine,
 California,  Japan   Electrical   Manufacturers
 Association, U.S. EPA, U.S. Air Force, Swedish
 National Environmental Protection Agency, and
 Russian Institute of Applied Chemistry have signed
 formal  Memorandums of  Understanding  with
 ICOLP.  ICOLP will work with the U.S. EPA to,
 disseminate  information on  technically feasible,
 cost  > effective,   and   environmentally  sound
 alternatives for ozone depleting solvents.

 ICOLP is also working with the National Academy
 of Engineering to hold a series  of workshops to
 identify promising research directions and to make
 most efficient use of research funding.

 The goals of ICOLP are to:

 • Encourage  the prompt  adoption- of  safe,
   environmentally  acceptable,  non-proprietary
   alternative   substances,  processes, • and
   technologies to replace current ozone-depleting
   solvents;

 • Act  as  an  international  clearinghouse  for
   information on alternatives;

 » Work  with  existing private, national,  and
   international trade groups, organizations, and
   government bodies to develop the most efficient

-------
•120	

   means of creating, gathering, and distributing
   information on alternatives.

 One   example  of ICOLP's  activities  is  the
 development  .and  support  of  an  alternative
 technologies  electronic, database  "OZONET."
 OZONET is accessible worldwide and has relevant
 information on the alternatives to ozone-depleting
 solvents.  OZONET not only contains technical
 publications, conference papers, and reports on the
 most recent developments  of alternatives  to the
 current uses of ozone-depleting solvents, but it also
 contains:

 » Information  on   the   health,  safety,  and
   environmental effects of alternative chemicals
   and processes;

 * Information supplied by companies developing
   alternative chemicals and technologies;

 * Names, addresses, and telephone numbers for
   technical  experts,  government   contacts,
   institutions and associations,  and  other key
   contributors to the selection of alternatives;

 * Dates and places of forthcoming conferences,
   seminars, and workshops; and

 * Legislation that has been enacted or is in place
   internationally, nationally, and locally.

 Information about ICOLP can be obtained from:

   Ms. Allison Merrill
   Project Manager
   ICOLP
   2000 L Street, N.W.
   Suite 710
   Washington, D.C 20036
   Tel: (202)737-1419
   Fax: (202)296-7472

-------
                                                                        121
                              APPENDIX B

   LIST OF VENDORS FOR CFC-113 AND METHYL CHLOROFORM
                  SOLVENT CLEANING SUBSTITUTES
This is not an exhaustive list of vendors. Vendors can be cited in any subsequent editions of this document
by sending information to ICOLP. ICOLP's address is provided in Appendix A. Listing is for information
purposes only, and does not constitute any vendor endorsement by EPA, ICOLP, or the committee members,
either express or implied, of any product or service offered by such entity.

-------

-------
 AQUEOUS CLEANERS
 3D, Inc.
 2053 Plaza Drive
 Benton Harbor, MI 49022-2211
 Tel: (800) 272-4326
 Fax: (616) 925-1922

 Altos Engineering, Inc.
 6009 N. 61 Ave
 Glendale.AZ 85301
 Tel: (602) 931-8434
 Fax: (602) 937-6396

 Ambassador Marketing
 Route 1-Box 207   .
 St. David, AZ  85630
 Tel: (602) 720-4310
 Fax:  (602) 720-4068

 Amtrex Technologies Inc.
 3361 boulevard Griffith
 Saint-Laurent QC
 Canada H4T 1W5
 Tel: (514) 739-0233
 Fax: (514)739-1581

 Ardrox
 16961 Knott Avenue
 La Mirada, CA 90638
 Tel: (714)739-2821
 Fax: (714) 670-6480

 AT-CHEM
 1225 W. Main St.
 Wilmington, OH 45177
 Tel: (513) 362-7511
    (800) 443-2436
 Fax: (513) 362-8038

 AtoChem North America
 3 Parkway
 Philadelphia, PA 19102
Tel: (215) 587-7000

Betz Metchem
508 Prudential Rd.
Horsham, PA  19044
Tel: (800) 775-7175
Batch and inline cleaning equipment with non-chemical,
thermal vacuum drying of rinse waters.   Detergent
formulations available with and without glycol ethers.
Aqueous, and alcohol-based cleaners for low residue
decreasing and dewaxing applications. Formulations are
nonflammable and nonfuming.
Aqueous ultrasonic cleariing/degreasing systems for the
metalworking,  aerospace,  automotive, military, and
plating industries.
Full  range  of aqueous-based formulations as well  as
aliphatic  hydrocarbon-based  blends,  terpene-based
formulations,  hydrocarbon-based  solvent blends and
other cleaning alternatives and equipment.

-------
 Blue Wave Ultrasonics"
 Div. of Alpheus Cleaning
  Technologies Corp.
 96QS. RolffSt.
 Davenport, IA 52802
 Tel: (319) 322-0144   .
     (800) 373-0144
 Fax: (319)322-7180

 Branson Ultrasonics Corp.
 41 Eagle Rd.
 Danbury, CT 06810
 Tel: (203) 796-0400
 Fax: (203) 7964)381

 The Brulin Corporation
 PO Box 270  .
 2920 Dr. Andrew J. Brown Ave.
 Indianapolis, IN 46206
 Tel: (317) 923-3211
 Fax: (317) 925-4596

 Buckeye International, Inc.
 2700 Wagner Place
 Maryland Heights, MO 63043
 Tel: (800) 321-2583
 Fax: (314) 298-2850   ,

 Chem-Tech International
 1800 Diagonal Rd., Suite 600
 Alexandria, VA  22314
 Tel: (703) 549-1001
 Fax: ,(703) 549-1003
 Ultrasonic  cleaning  equipment  built  for  various
 applications specific to the customer's needs. Effective
 in cleaning different products and materials throughout
 the scope of fabricated metals, plastics, and ceramics.
 Also  offer   aqueous-based  detergents  that  are
 environmentally safe.
 Ultrasonic cleaning equipment and integrated cleaning
 systems for metal, electronic, and precision cleaning
 requirements.  Manual and fully automated material
 handling/transport systems.  Equipment for aqueous,
 semi-aqueous and solvent chemistry.

 Advanced  technology aqueous detergent systems for
 spray,  immersion,  ultrasonic,  and  passive process
 cleaning of fabricated metal or plastic parts.
 Aqueous cleaners made with new  patented chemistry
 have successfully replaced MEK, 1,1,1-trichloroethace,
 acetone,  and  other  hydrocarbon  solvents  hi many
 different applications.
 Aqueous-based formulations containing detergents with
 and  without  glycol ethers  as  well  as  blends  of
 hydrocarbons and  emulsifiers which,  when  used in
 combination, provide residue-free cleaning. Can be used
 on all metals, teflon, plastic, and painted coatings. Also
 specially designed cleaning equipment.
Chemtronics, Inc.
8125 Cobb Center Dr.
Kennesaw, GA  30144
Tel: (404) 424^1888
Fax: (404) 424-4267

Circle-Proseo, Inc.
2017 Yost Ave.
Bloomington, IN 47403
Tel: (812) 339-3653
Fax: (812) 331-2566
.Ultra-pure cleaners for electronics and metals.
 Aqueous, alkaline, etchant cleaners for ferrous and non-
 ferrous applications.   Aqueous,  acidic, neutral, and
 alkaline oil rejecting cleaners with or without glycol
 ethers for ferrous and non-ferrous applications.  Water
 miscible, semi-aqueous cleaners (electronics cleaning).
 Water  emulsifiabie  cleaners  containing aliphatic and
 terpene  solvents.    Evaporative oils  for  no  clean
 applications.

-------
 Container Products Corp.
 PO Box 3767
 Wilmington, NC 28406
 Tel: (919) 392-6100
 Fax: (919) 392-6778

 Crest Ultrasonics
 Scotch Rd.- Mercer County Airport
 PO Box 7266
 Trenton, HI  08628
 Tel: (609) 883^000
    (800) 441-9675
 Fax: (609) 883-6452

 Dell-Chem of Arizona
 7119 E. Shea Blvd., Suite 106-224
 Seottsdale, AZ 85254
 Tel: (602) 951-5812
 Fax: (602) 948-4172

 Delta-Omega Technologies, Ltd.
 PO Box 81518
 Lafayette, LA 70598-1518  -
 Tel: (318) 237-5091.
 Fax: (318) 237-5131

 Detrex Corp.
 4000 Town Center, Suite 1100
 Southfield, MI  48175
 Tel: (313) 358-5800
 Fax: 013) 358-5803
Dow U.S.A.
Midland, MI 48674
Tel: (800) 447-4369
Fax: (517) 832-1465

Ecolink
1481 Rock Mountain Blvd.
Stone Mountain, GA 30083
Tel: (404) 621-8240
    (800)886-8240
Fax: (404) 621-8245

Electrolube Corporation USA
8200 Saint James Ave.
Elmhurst, NY  11373
Tel: (718) 565-5200
Fax: (718) 565-5715
Systems  incorporating a variety -of aqueous  cleaning
techniques  which  include  filtered  negative  pressure
cha&abers, high pressure chambers, and mobile cleaning
systems.
Precision, cleaning  equipment  (primarily  ultrasonic
systems) from standard wash-rinse-dry cleaning consoles
to large custom automated batch cleaning equipment.
Ultrasonic  generator  is  sweep  frequency generator
capable of cavitating both aqueous  and semi-aqueous
chemistries.   Full  line of  aqueous-based cleaning
chemistries for ultrasonic applications as well.

Aqueous and alcohol-basied cleaners for low residue
degi easing and dewaxing applications. Formulations are
nonflammable and aonfartiing.
Fully  aqueous,  biodegradable,  non-toxic  cleaning
solutions.  Products leave no residue following proper
cleaning and rinsing, no  fumes  or odors,  are non-
flammable, and contain no hazardous or  reportable
components.

Aqueous  micro-emulsion  solution  for gross  metal
cleaning  and equipment  for use with the cleaning
solution. Alternative/vapor degreasing process, specialty
equipment  and solvents  for metals  and  electronics
cleaning, chlorinated and HCFC solvents, and aqueous
and semi-aq-ieous  solvents.

Multiple formulations composed of blends of anionic and
nonionic surfactants  with   corrosion  inhibitors  and
builders.
Wide range of aqueous, semi-aqueous and non-aqueous
chemistries.     Formulations   include  a  variety' of
hydrocarbon, NMP, DBE and terpene products as well
as   non-ozone   depleting   halbgenated   solvents.
Manufacture a complete line of batch cleaning units for
use with these solvents.
   i *" *
   i                                        1
Non-toxic,  non-flammable,   biodegradable  aqueous
solvents suitable for in-liine and batch equipment without
modification. Also ideal for^ screen and pallet cleaning
and  precision  metal  degreasing (ferrous  and  non-
ferrous).

-------
 Environmental Solvents^Corp.
 1840 Southside Blvd.
 Jacksonville, FL 32216
 Tel: (904) 724-1990
 Fix: (904) 724-2508

 ETUS, Inc.
 151 IKasmer Place
 Sanfbrd, FL 32771
 Tel: (407) 321-7910
 Fax: (407) 321-3098

 Fine Organics Corp.
 205 Main St.
 POBox687
 Lodi, NJ 07644-0687
 Teh (201) 472-6800
     (800) 526-7480
 Fax: (201) 472-6810

 Fremont Industries, Inc.
 4400 Valley Industrial Park
 Shakopee, MN  55379
 Tel: (612) 445^121
 Fax:(612)496-3027

 Hubbard-Hall, Inc.
 PO Box 790
 Waterbury, CT 06725
 Tel: a03) 754-2171
    (800) 648-3412
 Fax: (203) 596-9544
    (203) 756-9017

 Hurricane Systems, Inc.
 2080 Brooklyn Rd.
 PO Box 867
 Jackson, MI 49204
 Tel: (517) 787-3481
 Fax: (517) 787-2349
Hurri-Kleen Corp.
POBox29
Trussvllle, AL 35173
Tel: (205) 655-8808
Fax: (205) 655-5392
Blend of coniferous (pine) terpenes, surfactants, and rust
inhibitor.     Alternative  to   conventional  alkaline
detergents.  Removes hydrocarbon grease/oil where it
floats to tiie surface and is skimmed off.
Formulations made  of hydrocarbons' and  blends of
hydrocarbons and eraulsifiers. Also offer aqueous-based
formulations containing detergents  with  and without
glycol ethers.
Non-hazardous and biodegradable solvent and solvent-
emulsion based alternatives.  Products are applicable to
the transportation,* aviation, electronics,  and coatings
industries. Also offer water-based alternative products.
Aqueous-based metal cleaning and non-metallic substrate
cleaning   formulations  and  application  equipment.
Includes spray, soak, and ultrasonic cleaners in rinse and
no-rinse formulations.
Wide range of "off-the-shelf", semi-custom, and custom
parts  cleaning systems  using water-based  cleaning
compounds. Systems include: belt, rotary and overhead
conveyors for continuous and batch processing; carousel,
cabinet, and agitation tank  washers; multi-stage wash,
rinse, oxidation inhibit, and dry; oil removal and oil
skimming  devices;  electric,  gas,  and steam  heat
packages.

Aqueous-based biodegradable cleaners with and without
glycol ethers.

-------
 Industrial Chemical Products
 15378 Proctor Ave.
 City of Industry, CA  91745
 Tel: (818) 961-9581
    (800)331-1197
 Fax: (818) 333-6736

 Insitu Environmental Chemical Co.
 8402 East Redwing Rd.
 Scottsdale, AZ 85250-5740
 Tel: (602) 948*9209
 Fax: (602) 951-0715

 JnJ Industries
 195 £. Main St.
 Suite 303
 Milford, MA  01757
 Tel: (800) 554-9994
 Fax: (508) 478-2221

.Lewis  Corp.
 102 Wilienbrock Rd.
 Oxford, CT  06478-1033
 Tel: (203) 264-3100
 Fax: (203) 264-3102

 MacDermid,  Inc.
 245 Freight St.
 Waterbury, CT 06702
 Tel: (203) 575-5700
 Fax: (203) 575-5630

 Modern Chemical Inc.
PO Box 368
Jacksonville,  AR  72076
Tel: (501) 988-1311
Fax: (501) 682-7691

Neozyme  International, Inc.
3333 W. Pacific Coast Hwy. 4th Floor
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Tel: (714) 650-9131
Fax: (714) 642-3005
Aqueous and alcohol-based cleaners  for  low residue
degreasing and dewaxing applications.  Formulations are
nonflammable and nonfuming.
Manufacturer of eight nom-CFC formulations including
a supersaturated wipe solvent.
Manufacturer of industrial cleaning systems, specializing
in aqueous-based chemistries.  Both ultrasonic and non-
ultrasonic washers available.
Non-toxic, non-corrosive, and non-flammable alkaline
aqueous-based cleaner.  Clan be used in hand sprayers,
flip tanks, ultrasonic, and spray wash cabinets.
Decreasing formulations made of plant derived enzymes
and  fully biodegradable emulsifiers  in  an aqueous
solution.   Unique  applications in  water treatment
systems.  Can be used in conjunction with ultrasound
micro-wave, and  other  types of mechanical cleaning
devices.

-------
 North American Environmental Oil
  & Cleaning Supply Company
 270A Route 46, Suite Bl
 Roekaway, NJ  07866
 Tel: (201) 627-0722
 '    (201) 627*1503   ,
 Fax: ,(201) 627-2982

 Oakhe Products, Inc.
 50 Valley Rd.
 Berkeley Heights, NJ  07922
 Td: (201) 464-6900

 O.C.S. Systems
 PO Box 370
 429 Madera St.
 San Gabriel, CA 91778-0370
 Td:,(818)458-2471
 Fax: (818) 458-2437

 Parker-Amchem
 32100 Stephenson Highway
 Madison Heights, MI  48071
 Tel: (313) 583-9300

 PPG Chemfil
 1330 Piedmont
 Troy, MI 48083
 Tel: (313) 689-0720

 PPG Industries, Inc.
 Chemicals Group
 1 PPG Place
 Pittsburgh, PA 15272
 Td: (800) 243-6774
 Fax: (412) 434-2401

 Quaker Chemical Corp.
 Elm & Lee Streets
 Conshohocken, PA 19428-0809
 Td: (215) 828-1250
 Fax: (215) 828-1817
                              i
 Qual-Tech Enterprises, Inc.
 1485 Bayshore Blvd.
 San Francisco, CA 94124
Td: (415) 467-7887
Fax: (415) 467-7092
Offer aqueous-based formulation containing detergents
with and without EGBE.  Biodegradable, sewerable.
Ultrasonics, spray wash systems, dishwashers, cabinet
washers for cleaning, defluxing any and all parts.
Complete closed loop systems,  including D.I. water
systems.
Micro-emulsion cleaning system suitable for many metal
cleaning applications.  System is neutral, non-ionic, low
VOC,  non-combustible  and  biodegradable.    Also
contains a rust inhibitor package and features long bath
life and low waste generation.  •

-------
 R.G. Hanson Co., Inc.
 703 E. Lincoln
 Bloomington, EL  61701
 Tel: (309) 828-5070
    (800) 392-0903
 Fax: (309) 829-3294

 Rochester Midland Corp.
 333 Hollenbeck St.
 Rochester, NY 14621
Tel: (716) 336-2200
 Fax: (716) 467^406
 Selig Chemical Industries
 PO Box 43106
 840 Selig Dr. SW
 Atlanta, GA  30378
 Tel: (404) 691-9220
 Fax: (404) 699-7024

 Smart Sonic Precision Cleaning Systems
 2373 Teller Rd., #107
 Newbury Park, CA 91320
 Tel: (805) 499-7440
 Fax: (805) 375-5781

 SONICOR Instrument Corp.
 100 Wartburg Ave.
 Copiague, NY 11726
 Tel: (516) 842-3344
 Fax: (516) 842-3389

 Storchera Inc.
 3600 Billings Court, Suite 110
 Burlington, Ontario
 Canada L7N3N6
Tel: (416) 639-9700
Fax: (416) 639-5244

Sunshine Makers, Inc./Simple Green
 15922 Pacific Coast Highway
Huntington Harbor, CA 92649  -
Tel: (310) 795-6000
    (800) 228-0709
Fax: (310) 592-3034
 Aqueous  cleaning  chemicals  and * equipment.   New
 equipment using only steam to.clean also available.
-Formulations comprised of hydrocarbon and/or terpene
 solvents.  Some also contain surfactants. Many contain
 alkaline builders and chelants as well as glycol ethers.
 Some aqueous-based or water-compatible formulations
 exhibit good biodegradability. Many products allow for
 good oil/grease separation upon standing.  '          v

 Formulations  made of hydrocarbons  and  blends of
 hydrocarbons and emulsifuirs. Also offer aqueous-based
 formulations containing detergents with and  without
 glycol ethers and some containing d-limonene.
 Automated  ultrasonic  and spray  batch  cleaners  for
 precision cleaning of metal, plastic, and ceramic parts.
 Systems clean oils, paniculate and other contaminates.
 Optional waste evaporator.
 Ultrasonic  cleaning  equipment, automated  aqueous
 cleaning systems.  Environmentally safe alternatives to
 cleaning with hazardous solvents.
 Aqueous-based  terpene   formulations   containing
 detergents and emulsifiers; semi-aqueous cleaners and
 clegreasers based on terpene alcohols and hydrocarbons;
 terpene alcohol and  hydrocarbon blends used as non-
 water soluble solvents.
 Concentrated aqueous-based non-toxic, biodegradable,
 non-flammable cleaner/degreaser containing a blend of
 high-grade penetrams and surfactants which are activated
 by water.

-------
 Terpene Technologies Inc.
 3400 Ridge Rd. W, Suite 293
 Rochester, NY  14626
 Td: (716) 546-8455  .
    (716) 777-0790
 Fax: (716) 227-3834   ..

 Texo Corp.
 2801 Highland Ave.
 Cincinnati, OH 45212
 Td: (513) 731-3400
 Fax:(513)731-8113
 Thierica
 900 Clancy Ave.
 Grand Rapids, MI 49503
 Td: (616)458-1538
 Fax: (616)458-7120

 Today & Beyond
 PO Box 690
 Ashland, OH  44805
 Td: (419) 945-2628
 Ultrasound Fabrications, Inc.
 1 Maple St.
 Shelton, CT 06484
 Td: (203) 924-1624
 Fax: (203) 924-1625

 Unitech Industrial Inc.
 PO Box 330
 16 South Ave,
 Wappingers Falls, NY  12590
 Tel: (914) 2974)745
    (800) 277-5522
 Fax: (914) 297-2919

 United Laboratories, Inc.
 320 37th Ave.
 St. Charles, IL 60174
Td: (708) 773-0252
 Fax: (708) 773-0595
Terpene alcohol and hydrocarbon* blends used as non-
water  soluble solvents,  semi-aqueous • cleaners and
degreasers based on terpene alcohols and hydrocarbons.
Also offer aqueous-based terpene formulations containing
detergents and emulsifiers.
Aqueous, semi-aqueous, and various solvent cleaners for
replacement of vapor degreasing and handwiping with
solvents.    Applications  of cleaners  can  be  spray
immersion, ultrasonic or handwiping.  Cleaners can be
multimetal safe and contain corrosion  inhibitors  if
necessary.

New low cost  spray equipment  manages  extremely
difficult cleaning jobs. Used with large and small parts
containing baked pease and paint soils.  Designed to be
safe and environmentally secure with hydrocarbon and
aqueous cleaning agents. Stainless steel construction.

Specialty industrial cleaners formulated utilizing SPC to
.meet the needs and  cleaning requirements  for the
aerospace,  aircraft,  automotive,  electronics,  marine,
military and nuclear industries. Existing vapor tanks can
be used with minor modification in most cases.

Ultrasonic parts washing  systems with standard tank
volumes of 5,  10, 20, and  30 gallons, as well as special
sizes if required.    Systems provide for  ultrasonic
washing, spray or different types of immersion rinsing
and hot air drying to  achieve clean, dry, spot free parts.

Closed loop industrial cleaning systems.  Spray washers,
batch  cleaning  systems,  vapor  degreasing,  and
pretreatment systems available in  new equipment and
retrofits. Waste water treatment and recycling, 100% oil
removal from the cleaning process.
Aqueous cleaners for use on most metals.  Can be used
from ambient temperatures to 200°, direct spray, spray
under immersion, or in ultrasonic operations.

-------
 W.R. Grace & Co.    *
 Metalworking Fluids Group
 55 Hayden Ave.
 Lexington, MA 02173
 Tel: (617) 861-6600
 Fax: (617) 861-9066

 Zelman Internationa! Ltd.
 PO Box 1112
 Studio City, CA 91614
 Tel: (818) 786-9488
    (310) 576-6830 sales
 Fax: (818) 787-8560
    (310) 576-6832
Zip-Chem Products
I860 Dobbin Dr.
San Jose, CA 95133
Tel: (408) 729-0291
    (800) 648-2661
Fax: (408) 272-8062
Wide range of aqueous cleaning formulations for metal.
precision,  and  maintenance   cleaning.    Includes
formulations  that are phosphate-free.   Suitable for
agitation, soak, spray, ultrasonic and hand wipe
applications.
Homogeneous  blend of colloids, surfactants,  hyper-
wetting agents and water in an industrial non-toxic, non-
caustic  cleaner  designed  to clean commercial and
military aircraft, as well  as metal  surfaces such  as
aluminum  and  magnesium  alloys,  removing  mill
markings, mill inks and shop soils such as dirt, coolants,
lubricants, forming and cutting oils, and other common
shop contaminants.  Highly diluted, it is also used in
ultrasonic and precision cleaning and degreasing.

Aqueous, semi-aqueous aliphatic hydrocarbon, terpene
and  alcohol-based  cleaners.   Application oriented
packaging like wipes, aerosols, specialty containers, and
other delivery systems available.
AQUEOUS CLEANING EQUIPMENT

ACCEL
1825 E. Piano Parkway
Piano, TX 75074-8129
Tel: (214)424-3525
Fax: (214) 424-7526
ACME-FAB
Div. of A-F Industries
11337 Williamson Rd.
Cincinnati, OH 45249
Tel: (513) 489-3060
Fax: (513) 489-6018

Advanced Curing Systems, Inc.
3701 S. Ashland Ave.  ,
Chicago, IL 60609
Tel: (312) 247-3600
System utilizing centrifugal cleaning to provide superior
washing, effective rinsing, and  drying of populated
printed  circuit boards aid  hybrid  circuits.  Includes
automatic solvent recycling and rinse water purification
with no required drain. Compatible with chlorocarbons,
fluorocarbons, H20, and terpenes.

Batch and conveyoirized spray cleaning systems, standard
machines,  or custom designed equipment.  Also offer
automatic  immersion  systems incorporating rotation
agitation and pump turbu lation.

-------
 Advanced Debarring and Finishing
 25 Marianne Dr.
 P0 Box 2491
 York, PA  17405
 Teh (717) 767-4843
    (800) 553-7060   ..

 Altos Engineering, Inc.
 6009 N. 61 Ave
 Glendalc, AZ 85301
 Tel: (602) 931-8434
 Fax: (602) 937-6396

 American Metal Wash, Inc.
 PO Box 265
 360 Euclid Ave.
 Camwnsburg, PA  15317
 Tel: (412) 746-4203
 Fax:(412)746-5738
 Amtrex Technologies Inc.
 3361 Boulevard Griffith
 Saint-Laurent QC
 Canada H4T 1W5
 Tel: (514) 739-0233
 Fax: (514)739-1581

 Ardrox
 16961  Knott Avenue
 LaMirada, CA 90638
 Tel: (714) 739-2821
 Fax: (714) 670-6480

 ATCOR Corp.
 150 Great Oaks Blvd.
 San Jose, CA 95119-1367
Tel: (408) 629-6080
    (800) 827-6080
Fax: (408) 629-9009

Baron-Blakeslee, Inc.
 1500 West 16th St.
Long Beach, CA 90813
Tel: (800) 548-4422
Fax: (310) 491-1091
Batch and inline cleaning equipment with non-chemical,
thermal vacuum drying of rinse  waters.  Detergent
formulations available with and without giycol ethers.
Bearing washer for precision cleaning of final assembled
race bearings,  including points of contact. Equipment
can  be  provided  in  single  or  multi-stages  for
accommodations of washing, rinsing, rust inhibiting, and
thorough drying of each bearing.   Can accommodate
bearing diameters  of 7/8" to 20" and can be setup for
use with aqueous or semi-aqueous cleaning solutions.

Aqueous ultrasonic cleaning/degreasing systems for the
metalworking,  aerospace,  automotive, military,  and
plating industries.
Full range of aqueous-based formulations as well as
aliphatic   hydrocarbon-based  blends,  terpene-based
formulations, hydrocarbon-based solvent  blends  and
other cleaning alternatives and equipment.
Full line of cleaning equipment for use with aqueous,
semi-aqueous, HCFC^ and chlorinated solvents. Closed
loop system incorporating vacuum drying available (near
zero emissions).

-------
 Barrett Centrifugals
 Box 15059
 Worcester, MA 01615-0059
 Tel: (508) 755-4306
    (800) 228-6442
 Fax: (508) 753-4805

 Better Engineering Mfg, Inc.
 8361 Town Center Court
 Baltimore, MD 21236
 Tel: (410) 931-0000
    (800) 229-3380

 Blackstone Ultrasonics, Inc.
 9 North Main St.
 Jamestown, NY 14701
 Tel: (716) 665-2620
    (800)766-6606
 Fax: (716) 665-2480

 Blue Wave Ultrasonics
 Div. of Alpheus Cleaning
  Technologies Corp.
 960 S. RolffSt.
 Davenport, IA 52802
Tel: (319) 322-0144
    (800) 373-0144
 Fax: (319) 322-7180

 Bowden Industries Inc.
 1004 Oster Dr. NW
 Huntsville, AL 35816
 Tel: (800) 553-3637 ,

 Branson Ultrasonics Inc.
 41 Eagle Rd.
 Danbury, CT  06810
 Tel: (203) 796-0400
 Fax: (203) 796-0381

 Chem-Tech International
 1800 Diagonal Rd., Suite 600
 Alexandria, VA 22314
Tel: (703) 549-1001
Fax: (703) 549-1003
Centrifugal equipment for washing and drying small,
Irregularly shaped parts vising detergent/water solution.
With custom fixturing, can be adapted for larger, more
complex parts or assemblies.
Complete range of ultrasonic cleaning products from
stand-alone and bench-top heated tanks to wash/multiple
rinse/dry console systems with optional material handling
and automation. Also, flnxless ultrasonic solder pots for
tinning leads and electronics.
Ultrasonic   cleaning  equipment   built  for  various
applications specific to the customer's needs. Effective
in cleaning different products and materials throughout
the scope of fabricated metals, plastics, and ceramics.
Also   offer  aqueous-based  detergents   that   are
environmentally safe.
Ulsrasonic cleaning equipment and integrated cleaning.
systems for metal, electronic, and  precision cleaning
requirements.   Manual and fully automated material
handling/transport systems.   Equipment for  aqueous,
semi-aqueous and solvent chemistry.

Aqueous-based formulations containing detergents with
and  without  glycol  ethers  as 'well  as  blends  of
hydrocarbons  and emulsifiers which, when used  in
combination, provide residue-free cleaning. Can be used
on all metals, teflon, plastic, and painted coatings.  Also
specially designed cleaning equipment.

-------
 Cincinnati Industrial Machinery
 PO Box 62027
 3280 Hagomn St.
 Cincinnati, OH  45241 (street aid.)
                 45262 (PO Box)
 Td: (513) 769-0700   ,
 Fax: (513) 769-0697

 Container Products Corp.
 PO Box 3767
 Wilmington, NC 28406
 Td: (919) 392-6100
 Fax:(919)392-6778

 Creative Enterprizes
 3560 Springwood, Suite 811
 Ponca City, OK 74604
 Td: (405) 765-0879
 Fax: (405) 765-0879   -

 Crest Ultrasonics
 Scotch Rd. - Mercer County Airport
 PO Box 7266
 Trenton, NJ  08628
 Td: (609) 883-4000
    (800) 441-9675
 Fax: (609) 883-6452

 Detrex Corporation
 4000 Town Center, Suite 1100
 Southfield, MI 48075
 Tel: (313)358-5800
 Fax: (313) 358-5803
DURR Industries, Inc.
10301 Enterprises Dr.
Davisburg, MI 48350
Tel: (313) 625-5400
Fax: (313) 625-5966
t
Ecolink
1481 Rock Mountain Blvd.
Stone Mountain, GA 30083
Td: (404) 621-8240
       (800) 886-8240
Fax: (404) 621-8245
Custom  designed machines  for  cleaning,  surface
preparation & other processing of metal and non-metallic
parts.
Systems incorporating a variety of aqueous cleaning
techniques  which  include filtered negative pressure
chambers, high pressure chambers, and mobile cleaning
systems.
Specialize in low cost conversion of existing facilities to
safely use alternative cleaning agents.  Design new or
custom cleaning equipment and processes. Also design
environmentally secure drying equipment and processes.
Precision  cleaning  equipment  (primarily  ultrasonic
systems) from standard wash-rinse-dry cleaning consoles
to large custom automated batch cleaning equipment.
Ultrasonic  generator  is  sweep frequency  generator
capable of cavitating both aqueous and  semi-aqueous
chemistries.   Full  line  of  aqueous-based  cleaning
chemistries for ultrasonic applications as well.

Aqueous micro-emulsion  solution  for  gross'  metal
cleaning  and equipment  for use  with  the cleaning
solution. Alternative/vapor degreasing process, specialty
equipment  and solvents  for metals and electronics
cleaning, chlorinated and HCFC solvents, and aqueous
and semi-aqueous solvents.

All aqueous and semi-aqueous systems recycle and reuse
process water.  Solvent systems reduce emissions by
99% over conventional degreasing systems.
Wide range of aqueous, semi-aqueous and non-aqueous
chemistries.     Formulations   include  a  variety  of
hydrocarbon, NMP, DBE and terpene products as wdl
as   non-ozone   depleting   halogenated   solvents.
Manufacture a complete line of batch cleaning units for
use with these solvents.

-------
 Electronic Controls Design, Inc.
 4287-A SE International Way
 Milwaukie, OR  97006
 Tel: (503) 659-6100
     (800)323-4548
 Fax: (503) 659-4422

 Environmental Recovery Resources, Inc.
 POBox36
 South Salem, NY  10590
 Tel: (914) 533-6175
 Fax:(914)533-6275
 FMT Inc. (Findlay Machine & Tool)
 1950 Industrial Dr.
 Findlay, OH  4584O
 Tel: (419) 422-0768
     (800)878-8011
 Fax: (419) 422-0072

 Finishing Equipment Inc.
 3640 Kennebec Dr.
 St. Paul, MN  55122
 Tel: (612) 452-1860
 Fax: (612) 452-9851
 Forward Technology Ind. Inc.
-13500 County Rd. 6
 Minneapolis, MN 55441
 Tel: (612) 559-1785

 Fremont Industries, Inc.
 4400 Valley Industrial Park
 Shakopee, MN  55379
 Tel: (612) 445-4121
 Fax:  (612) 496-3027

 George Koch Sons Inc.
 10 South llth Ave.
 EvansvUle,IN 47744
 Tel: (812) 426-9600
 Fax:  (812) 465-9724
Floating,   dispersed,  and   dissolved   hydrocarbon
contaminants removed to surface water discharge limits,
using: no coalescing plates,  no centrifugal, no carbon
absorption, no sorbent waste.  Also offer'systems and
services to extend cleaning  bath  'life* for more  cost
effective aqueous systems and waste water processing,
and   waste-minimized  settling-pond  and  separator
maintenance/remediation.

Custom engineered parts cleaning equipment, standard
part1;  cleaning  equipment,  and pollution  control
equipment.
Aqueous,  semi-aqueous and solvent  cleaning systems
available.   From manual systems to automated high-
production cleaning lines, with ultrasonics available as
needed.    Specialize in  automated  enclosed  vapor
degreasers for efficient use of the non-ozone depleting
chlorinated solvents.
Aqueous-based metal cleaning and non-metallic substrate
cleaning   formulations  and  application  equipment.
Includes spray, soak, and ultrasonic cleaners in rinse and
no-rinse formulations.

-------
 Gray Mills
 3705 N. Lincoln Ave.
 Chicago, IL 60613
 Tel: (312) 268-6825

 Hie Hotsy Corp.
 21 Inverness Way E.
 Englewood.CO 80112-5796
 Td: (303) 792-5200

 Hurricane Systems, Inc.
 2080 Brooklyn Rd.
 PO Box 867
 Jackson, MI  49204
 Td: (517) 787-3481
 Fax: (517) 787-2349
 Hurri-Kleen Corp.
 PO Box 29
 Tnissville, AL  35173
 Td: (205) 655-8808
 Fax: (205) 655-5392

 Jensen Fabricating Engineers, Inc.
 PO Box 307
 East Berlin, CT 06023
 Td: (203) 828-6516

 J.M. Ney Co,
 Neytech Division
 Bloomfield, CT  06002
 Tel: (203) 342-2281
 Fax: (203) 242-5688

 K.E.W. Cleaning Systems, Inc.
 130B E. St. Charles Rd.
 Carol Stream, ZL 60188
 Tel: (70S) 690-3000

 Kleer-FIo Company
 15151 Technology Dr.
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Td: (612) 9343555
    (800) 328-7942
Fax: (612) 934-3909
Wide range of "off-the-shelf", semi-custom, and custom
parts  cleaning  systems  using water-based  cleaning
compounds.  Systems include: belt, rotary and overhead
conveyors for continuous and batch processing; carouse!,
cabinet, and agitation tank  washers; multistage wash,
rinse, oxidation inhibit, and dry; oil removal and oil
skimming devices;  electric,  gas,  and  steam  heat
packages.
                •                      t

Aqueous-based biodegradable cleaners with and without
glycol ethers.

-------
 Lewis Coip.
 102 WUlenbrock Rd.
 Oxford, CT  06478-1033
 Tel: (203) 264-3100
 Fax:(203)264-3102

 NAPCO
 Plymouth Industrial Park
 Terryville, CT 06786
 Tel: (203) 589-7800
 Fax: (203) 589-7304

 O.C.S. Systems
 PO Box 370
 429 Madera St.
 San Gabriel, CA  91778-0370
 Tel: (818) 458-2471
 Fax: (818) 458-2437

 Proceco
 7300TelIierSt.
 Montreal, Quebec
 Canada BIN 3T7
 Tel: (514) 254-8494
 Fax: (514) 254-8184
    (514)  254-6922

 RAMCO Equipment Corp.
 32  Montgomery St.
 Hillside, NJ  07205
 Tel: (908) 687-6700
    (800) 553-3650

 Ransohoff Co.
 North 5th  St at Ford Boulevard
 Hamilton, OH 45011
Tel: (513) 863-5813
    (800) 248-WASH
Fax: (513) 863-8908
R.G. Hanson Co., Inc.
703 E. Lincoln
Bloomington, IL 61701
Tel: (309) 828-5070
   (800) 392-0903
Fax: (309) 829-3294
Manufacturer of industrial cleaning-systems, specializing
In aqueous-based chemistries.  Both ultrasonic and non-
ultntsonic washers available.
Aqueous-based formulation containing detergents with
and  without  EGBE.    Biodegradable,  sewerable.
Ultrasonics, spray wash systems, dishwashers, cabinet
washers for  cleaning,  defluxing  any  and  all parts.
Complete  closed loop  systems, including D.I. water
systems.

Aqueous spray washers (turntable, belt conveyor, and
immersion types).  Also supply contaminated cleaning
solutions recycling systems.
Standard and custom aqueous and semi-aqueous cleaning
equipment for  small  through  high production, parts
cleaning requirements, as well as very small to large part
configurations and various part  materials.  Expertise in
precision cleaning.   Patented,  mechanically  agitated
aqueous technology  for iaigh volume intricately shaped
or machined parts as  a direct  replacement  of solvent
vapor degreasing and ultrasonic cleaning systems.
                               t
Aqueous cleaning  chemicals  and  equipment.   New
equipment using only steam to clean also available.

-------
 KmoJet   '
 2819 San Fernando Blvd.
 Burbank, CA 91504
 Tel: (818) 841-1520
 Fax: (818) 841-6448

 S & C Co., Ltd.
 North America Division
 PO Box 902141
 Palmdale, CA  93590-2141  '
 Tel: (805) 267-0799
 Fax:(805)267-2324

 Smart Sonic Precision Cleaning Systems
 2373 Teller Rd., #107
 Newbury Park, CA 91320
 Tel: (805) 499-7440
 Fax:  (805) 375-5781             !

 SON1COR Instrument Corp.
 100 Wartburg Ave.
 Copiague,NY 11726
 Tel: (516) 842-3344
 Fax:  (516) 842-3389

 Sonitech Inc.
 239 East Stephenson St.
 Freeport, IL 61032
 Tel: (815) 235-2400
 Fax: (815) 232-2150
Stocking
502 Highway 67
Kiel,WI  53042
Tel: (414) 894-2293
    (800) 558-5807
Fax: (414) 894-7029

Surface Dynamics Inc.
9185 General Court
Plymouth, MI 48170
Tel: (313) 459-0010

SURFTRAN (Bosch Group)
30250 Stephenson Highway
Madison Heights, MI  48071
Tel: (313) 547-3133
Four frequency ultrasonic generator and ultrasonic spray
cleaner suited for the cleaning of silicon waters and other
precision parts.
Automated  ultrasonic  and spray  batch  cleaners for
precision cleaning of metal, plastic, and ceramic parts.
Systems clean oils, paniculate and other contaminates.
Optional waste evaporator.
Ultrasonic  cleaning  equipment,  automated  aqueous
cleaning systems.  Environmentally safe alternatives to
cleaning with hazardous solvents.
Ultrasonic cleaning equipment using aqueous or semi-
aqueous chemistries for a wide range of applications.
Complete systems include cleaning tanks, rinse, tanks,
dryers and closed loop rinse water recirculation systems.
System uses alcohol or other solvents with perfluorinated
chemistry  for  rinsing and  drying  non-water  contact
applications.

-------
 Swen Some Corp.
 PO Box 4347
 Davenport, IA S2808
 Tel: (319) 322-0144
 Fax: 019} 322-7180

 Tally Cleaning Systems
 Division of Metfab Engineering
 332 John Diestch Blvd.
 Attleboro Falls, MA 02763
 Tel: (508) 6954007
 Fax: (508) 695-6335

 Thierica
 900 Clancy Ave.
 Grand Rapids, MI 49503
 Tel: (616)458-1538
 Fax: (616)458-7120

 Tiyoda MFG. U.S.A., Inc.
 1613 Lockness Place
 Torrance, CA  90501
 Tel: (310) 539-5471
 Fax: (310) 539-5881

 Ultrasound Fabrications, Inc.
 1 Maple St.
 Shelton, CT  06484
Tel: (203) 924-1624
 Fax: (203) 924-1625
           t         #
 Unique Industries, Inc.
 PO Box 417
 Mohawk Ave. Extension
 Derby, CT 06418
Tel: (203) 735-8751

 Unitech Industrial Inc.
PO Box 330
 16 South Ave,
Wappingers Falls,  NY   12590 ,
Tel: (914) 297-0745
    (800) 277-5522
Fax: (914) 297-2919
Single and multiple stage ultrasonic cleaning systems
which utilize  aqueous-based  cleaning formulations.
Complete systems available which include ultrasonic,
wash, rinse, rustinhibit, hot air dry, particle filtration,
oil separation, etc.  Standard, or custom engineered units.
New  low cost spray  equipment manages extremely
difficult cleaning jobs.  Used with large and small parts
containing baked grease and paint soils. Designed to be
safe and environmentally secure with hydrocarbon and
aqueous cleaning agents.  Stainless steel construction.

Vacuum desiring  ultrasonic  batch  cleaning system
provides instantaneous cleaning solution penetration into
small tubes and holes and promotes superior cleaning.
Vacuum drying system uses vacuum, hot air, ultra-pure
steam heating and far-infrared heater.
                                        i

Ultrasonic parts washing  systems  with standard tank
volumes of 5, 10, 20, arid 30 gallons, as well as special
sizes  if required.   Systems provide for ultrasonic
washing, spray or different types of immersion rinsing
and hot air drying to achieve clean, dry, spot free parts.
Closed loop industrial cleaning systems. Spray washers,
batch  cleaning  systems,  vapor   degreasing,  and
pretreatment systems available in new equipment and
retrofits. Waste water treatment and recycling, 100% oil
removal from the cleaning process.

-------
 Vitronics Corp.
 Forbes Rd.
 Newmarket Industrial Park
 Newmarket, NH 03857
 Td: (603) 659-6550
 Fax:(603)659-7194  /
Inline, aqueous and semi-aqueous  cleaning equipment
with closed loop water treatment systems.
 SEMI-AQUEOUS CLEANERS
 Aliphatic Hydrocarbon-Based

 ARCO Chemical Co.
 3801 West Chester Pike
 Newtown Square, PA 19073-2387
 Td: (215) 359-2441
 Fax: (215) 359-5753

 Ardrox
 16961 Knott Avenue
 La Mirada,  CA  90638
 Td: (714) 739-2821
 Fax: (714) 670-6480

 Brulin Corporation
 PO Box 270
 2920 Dr. Andrew J.  Brown*Ave.
 Indianapolis, IN 46206
 Tel: (317) 923-3211
 Fax:(317)925-4596    .

 Chemtronics, Inc.
 8125 Cobb Center Dr.
 Kennesaw, GA 30144
Td: (404) 424-4888
Fax: (404) 424-4267

 Cirde-Prosco, Inc.
2017 Yost Ave.
Bloomington, IN  47403
Tel: (812) 339-3653
Fax: (812) 331-2566
Creative Enterprizes
3560 Springwood, Suite 811
Ponca City, OK 74604
Tel: (405) 765-0879
Fax: (405) 765-0879
Full range of aqueous-based formulations  as  wdl as
aliphatic   hydrocarbon-based   blends,  terpene-based
formulations, hydrocarbon-based solvent  blends  and
other cleaning alternatives and equipment.
Advanced technology  aqueous detergent systems for
spray,  immersion,  ultrasonic,  and passive process
cleaning of fabricated metal or plastic parts.
Ultra-pure cleaners for electronics and metals.
Aqueous, alkaline, etchant cleaners for ferrous and non-
ferrous  applications.  Aqueous, acidic, neutral, and
alkaline oil rejecting cleaners with or without glycol
ethers for ferrous and non-ferrous applications.  Water
miscible, semi-aqueous cleaners (electronics cleaning).
Water  emulsifiable  cleaners containing  aliphatic and
terpene  solvents.   Evaporative  oils  for  no  clean
applications.

Specialize in low cost conversion of existing facilities to
safely use alternative cleaning agents.  Design new or
custom cleaning equipment and processes. Also design
environmentally secure drying equipment and processes.

-------
 Dow U.S.A.
 Midland, MI 48674
 Tel: (800) 447-4369
 Fax: (517) 832-1465

 Ecolink
 1481 Rock Mountain Blvd.
 Stone Mountain, GA  30083
 Tel: (404) 621-8240
       (800) 886-8240
 Fax: (404) 621-8245

 ETUS, Inc.
 1511 Kastner Place
 Sanford,FL 32771
 Tel:(407) 321-7910
 Fax: (407) 321-3098

 Fine Organics Corp.
 205 Main St.
 PO Box 687
 Lodi, NJ 07644-0687
 Tel: (201) 472-6800
    (800) 526-7480
 Fax:  (201) 472-6810

 JnJ Industries
 195 E. Main St.
 Suite 303
 Milford,  MA 01757
 Tel: (800) 554-9994
 Fax:(508)478-2221

 Kleer-Flo Company
 15151 Technology Dr.
Eden Prairie, MN  55344
Tel: (612) 934-2555
    (800) 328-7942
Fax: (612) 934-3909

 MacDermid, Inc.
245 Freight St.
Waterbury, CT 06702
Tel: (203) 575-5700
Fax: (203) 575-5630
Formulations composed of paraffinic hydrocarbons and
glycol ethers and  blends of paraffinic hydrocarbons,
glycol ethers, and surfactants.
Wide range of aqueous, semi-aqueous and non-aqueous
chemistries.     Formulations   include  a  variety  of
hydrocarbon, NMP, DBE and terpene products as well
as   non-ozone   depleting   halogenated   solvents.
Manufacture a complete line of batch cleaning units for
use with these solvents.

Formulations made of liiydrocarbons and  blends  of
hydrocarbons and emulsif iers.  Also offer aqueous-based
formulations  containing detergents with  and -without
glycol ethers.
Non-hazardous and biodegradable solvent and solvent-
emulsion based alternatives. Products are applicable to
the transportation, aviation, electronics, and  coatings
industries. Also offer water-based alternative products.
Manufacturer of eight non-CFC formulations including
a supersaturated wipe solvent.

-------
 Micro Care Corp.
 ?•' Ronzo Road
 : «tol,CT 06010
  . J: (203) 585-7912
 Fix: (203) 585-7378
 North American Environmental Oil
  & Cleaning Supply Company
 270A Route 46, Suite Bl
 Rockaway, NJ 07866
 Tel: (201) 627-0722
     (201) 627-1503
 Fax: (201) 627-2982

 Pctrofenn Inc.
 5415 First Coast Highway
 Fernandina Beach, FL 32034
 Tel: (904) 261-8286
 Fax: (904) 261-6994
 P-T Technologies, Inc.   .
 108 4th Ave. South
 Safety Harbor, FL  34695
 Tel: (800) 441-7874
 Fax: (813) 726-9544

 The Rission Group Inc.
 13349 Michigan Ave.
 Dearborn, MI 48126
 Tel: (313) 581-2620
 Fax: (313) 581-3758

 Rochester Midland Corp.
 333 Holienbeck St.
 Rochester, NY 14621
Tel: (716) 336-2200
Fax: (716) 467-4406
Selig Chemical Industries
PO Box 43106
840 Selig Dr. SW
Atlanta, GA 30378
Tel: (404) 691-9220
Fax: (404) 699-7024
Solvent cleaners based on but not limited to terpene
hydrocarbon,   alcohol,  or  HCFC • technologies.
Formulations are engineered for use in non-automated
hand cleaning applications where rinsing is not available.
Cleaners are effective in touch-up cleaning and precision
cleaning of all types of flux residues, oils, grease and
grime.
Broad line of formulations based on terpenes, ester, and
aliphatic hydrocarbons and  blends  of these  organic
solvents with surfactants.  Products  are used for cold
(hand) cleaning and in combination with various cleaning
equipment.  Products can be removed by evaporation,
water, alcohols or nonflammable fluorinated solvents.
Both products and rinse media can be recycled,

Nonhalogenated  hydrocarbon-based  and  water based
degreasers and  cleaners.   Specialty formulations for
electronics,  cable  manufacturing,  process cleaning,
utility applications general cleanup.          •
Aqueous  and non-aqueous formulations  containing
surfactants   with  and    without   glycol   ethers.
Hydrocarbons and  blends of  hydrocarbons   with
emulsifiers also available.
Formulations comprised of hydrocarbon and/or terpene
solvents. Some also contain surfactants.  Many contain
alkaline builders and chelants as well as glycol ethers.
Some aqueous-based or water-compatible formulations
exhibit good biodegradability. Many products allow for
good oil/grease separation upon standing.

Formulations made  of hydrocarbons and  blends  of
hydrocarbons and emulsifiers. Also offer aqueous-based
formulations containing  detergents with and without
glycol ethers and some containing d-limonene.

-------
 Too Corp.
 2801 Highland Ave.
 Cincinnati, OH 45212
 Tel: (513) 731-3400
 Fax:(513)731-8113
 Zip-Chem Products
 1860 Dobbin Dr.
 San Jose, CA 95133
 Tel: (408) 729-0291
    (800) 648-2661
 Fax:(408)272-8062
Aqueous, semi-aqueous, and various solvent cleaners for
replacement of vapor decreasing and handwiping with
solvents.    Applications of  cleaners  can  be  spray
immersion, ultrasonic or handwiping.  Cleaners can be
mulfimetal  safe and  contain  corrosion  inhibitors  if
necessary.

Aqueous, semi-aqueous aliphatic hydrocarbon, terpene
and  alcohol-based  cleaners.    Application  oriented
packaging like wipes, aerosols,, specialty containers, and
other delivery systems available.
 3D, Inc.
 2053 Plaza Drive
 Benton Harbor, MI 49022-2211
 Tel: (800) 272-4326
 Fax: (616) 925-1922

 Ardrox            '
 16961 Knott Avenue
 La Mirada,  CA 90638
 Tel: (714) 739-2821
 Fax: (714) 670-6480

 Chemtronics, Inc.
 8125 Cobb Center Dr.
 Kenne&aw, GA 30144
 Tel: (404) 4244888
 Fax: (404) 424-4267

 Circle-Prosco, Inc.
 2017 Yost Ave.
 Bloomington, IN  47403
 Tel: (812) 339-3653
 Fax: (812) 331-2566
Ecolink
1481 Rode Mountain Blvd.
Stone Mountain, GA  30083
Tel: (404) 621-8240
       (800) 886-8240
Fax: (404) 621-8245
Full range of aqueous-based formulations as well as
aliphatic  hydrocarbon-based  blends,   terpene-based
formulations, hydrocarbon-based  solvent  blends  and
other cleaning alternatives and equipment.
Ultra-pure cleaners for electronics and metals.
Aqueous, alkaline, etchant cleaners for ferrous and non-
ferrous applications.   Aqueous,  acidic,  neutral, and
alkaline oil  rejecting  cleaners with or without glycol
ethers  for ferrous and non-ferrous applications.  Water
mtscible, semi-aqueous cleaners (electronics cleaning).
Water, emulsifiable cleaners  containing aliphatic and'
terpene  solvents.    Evaporative' oils for  no  clean
applications.

Wide range of aqueous, semi-aqueous and non-aqueous
chemistries.     Formulations  include  a   variety  of
hydrocarbon, NMP, DBE and terpene products as well
as   non-ozone   depleting -• halogenated    solvents.
Manufacture a complete line of batch cleaning units for
use with these solvents.

-------
 Environmental SolventsTorp.
 1840 Southside Blvd.
 Jacksonville, FL 32216
 Tel: (904) 724-1990
 Fax: (904) 724-2508

 Envirosolutions Inc.
 335 Post Road West
 Westport,  CT  06880
 Tel: (203) 454-5902    .
 Fax: (203) 222-0190
 Fine Organics Corp.
 205 Main St.
 PO Box 687
 Lodi.NJ 07644-0687  .
 Tel: (201) 472-6800
    (800) 526-7480
 Fax: (201) 472-6810

 Glidco Organics
 PO Box 389
 Jacksonville, FL.  32201
 Tel: (800) 231-6728
    (904) 768-5800
 Fax: (904) 768-2200

 MacDermid, Inc.
 245 Freight St.
 Waterbury,  CT  06702
 Teh (203) 575-5700
 Fax: (203) 575-5630

 Micro Care Corp.
 34 Ronzo Road
 Bristol, CT 06010
 Tel: (203) 585-7912
 Fax: (203) 585-7378
Petroferm Inc.
5415 First Coast Highway
Fernandina Beach, FL 32034
Tel: (904) 261-8286
Fax: (904) 261-6994
Blend of coniferous  (pine) terpeftes with and  without
surfactants.  Non-surfactant-containing solvent is very
easy and  inexpensive to use  with closed-loop water
recyclng.   All  flash points over 140°F.   Very,high
solvency for hydrocarbon soils.

Biodegradable, non-caustic, neutral pH cleaner which is
used in a closed loop parts washing system.   Several
different formulations developed  to suit a variety of
cleaning needs.  Customized parts washing equipment is
matched to the cleaning chemicals to  ensure optimum
performance.
                            f             f  ,  "
Non-hazardous and biodegradable solvent and solvent-
emulsion based alternatives.  Products are applicable to
the transportation, aviation, electronics, and  coatings
industries. Also offer water-based alternative products.
Solvent cleaners based on  but not limited to terpene
hydrocarbon,  -alcohol,   or  HCFC  technologies.
Formulations are engineered for  use  in non-automated
hand cleaning applications where rinsing is not available.
Cleaners are effective in touch-up cleaning and precision
cleaning of all types of flux residues, oils, grease and
grime.
                               ;
Broad line of formulations based on terpenes, ester, and
aliphatic hydrocarbons and blends  of  these  organic
solvents with surfactants.   Products  are used for cold
(hand) cleaning and in combination with various cleaning
equipment.  Products can be removed by  evaporation,
water, alcohols or nonflammable fluorinated solvents.
Both products and rinse media can be recycled.

-------
 Rochester Midland Corp.
 333 Hollenbeck St.
 Rochester, NY  14621
 Tel: (716) 336-2200
 Fax:(716)467-4406
 Selig Chemical Industries
 PO Box 43106
 840 Selig Dr. SW
 Atlanta, GA 30378
 Tel: (404) 691-9220
 Fax: (404) 699-7024

 Storchem Inc.
 3600 Billings Court, Suite 110
 Burlington, Ontario
 Canada  L7N3N6
 Tel: (416) 639-9700
 Fax: (416) 639-5244

 Terpene Technologies Inc.
 3400 Ridge Rd. W, Suite 293
 Rochester, NY  14626
 Tel: (716) 546-8455
    (716) 777-0790
 Fax: (716) 227-3834

 Ultrasound Fabrications, Inc.
 1 Maple St.
 Shelton, CT 06484
 Tel: (203) 924-1C24
 Fax: (203) 924-1625

 Union Camp Corp.
 Bush Boake Allen Division
 PO Box 37617
 Jacksonville, FL 32236
 Tel: (904) 783-2180
    (800) 874-9220
 Fax: (904) 786-6495

 Zip-Chem Products
 1860 Dobbin Dr.
 San Jose, CA 95133
Tel: (408) 729-0291
    (800)648-2661
Fax: (408) 272-8062
Formulations comprised of hydrocarbon and/or terpene
solvents.  Some also contain surfactants.  Many contain
alkaline builders and chelants as well as glycol ethers.
Some aqueous-based or water-compatible formulations
exhibit good biodegradability. Many products allow for
good oil/grease separation upon standing.

Formulations made  of hydrocarbons and blends, of
hydrocarbons and emulsiflers. Also offer aqueous-based
formulations  containing detergents  with  and without
glycol .ethers and some containing d-limohene.
Aqueous-based   terpene  formulations   containing
detergents and emulsifiers; semi-aqueous cleaners and
degreasers based on terpune alcohols and hydrocarbons;
terpene alcohol and hydrocarbon blends used as non-
water soluble solvents.
Teipene alcohol and hydrocarbon blends used as non-
wai:er  soluble  solvents,, semi-aqueous  cleaners  and
degreasers based on terpene alcohols and hydrocarbons.
Also offer aqueous-based terpene formulations containing
detergents and emuisifiers.
Ultrasonic parts washing systems  with  standard tank
volumes of 5,10, 20, and 30 gallons, as well as special
sizes  if  required.   Systems  provide for  ultrasonic
washing, spray  or different types of immersion rinsing
and hot air drying to achieve clean,  dry, spot free parts.

Range of wood terpene-based  alternative solvents  for
semi-aqueous,and solvent only cleaning  processes and
maintenance cleaning applications.  High solvency and
high soil loading properties for removal of solder fluxes,
heavy  oils  and  greases,   polishing  compounds,
carbonaceous deposits  etc. to the highest  cleanliness
standards.

Aqueous, semi-aqueous aliphatic hydrocarbon, terpene
and  alcohol-based  cleaners.    Application oriented
packaging like wipes, aerosols, specialty containers, and
other delivery systems available.

-------
  Ambassador Marketing
  Route 1-Box 207
  St. David, AZ 85630
  Tel: (602) 7204310   ,
  Fax: (602) 720-4068

  ARCO Chemical Co.
  3801 West Chester Pike
  Newtown Square, PA 19073-2387
  Tel: (215) 359-2441
  Fax: (215) 359-5753

  Chemtronics, Inc.
  8125 Cobb Center Dr.
  Kcnnesaw, GA  30144
  Tel: (404) 4244888
  Fax: (404) 4244267

  Conceptronic, Inc.
  6 Post Rd.
  Portsmouth, NH 03801
  Tel: (603) 431-6262
  Fax: (603) 431-3303
 Dell-Chem of Arizona
 7119 E. Shea Blvd., Suite 106-224
 Seottsdale, AZ 85254
 Tel: (602) 951-5812
 Fax: (602) sM84172

' Insitu Environmental Chemical Co.
 8402 East Redwing Rd.
 Scottsdale, AZ 85250-5740
 Tel: (602) 948-9209
 Fax: (602) 951-0715

 JnJ Industries
 195 E. Main St.   .
 Suite 303
• Milford, MA 01757
 Tel: (800) 554-9994
 Fax: (508) 478-2221
Aqueous and alcohol-based cleaners  for low residue
degreasing and dewaxing applications. Formulations are
nonflammable and nonniming.
Ultra-pure cleaners for electronics and metals.
Semi-aqueous/spray-based, totally closed-loop modular
batch cleaning systems utilizing non-flammable, naturally
derived  alcohol solvents in  solution with water. Also
have an ultrasonic batch cleaning system for metallic and
non-metallic electronic surfaces and other difficult-to-
clean non-electronic parts of unusual geometric shape.

Aqueous and alcohol-based cleaners for low  residue
degreasing and dewaxing applications. Formulations are
nonflammable and nonniming.
Aqueous and alcohol-based cleaners  for low residue
degreasing and dewaxing applications.  Formulations are
nonflammable and nonniming.
Manufacturer of eight non-CFC formulations including
a supersaturated wipe solvent.

-------
 Ken Seika Corp.
 314 Willow Dr.
 Little Silver, f&  07739
 Tel: (908) 141-4920
 Fax:(908)758-9531

 Kyzen Corp.
 413 Harding Industrial Dr.
 Nashville, TN 37211
 Tel: (615) 831-0888
    (800) 845-5524
 Fax:  (615) 831-0889
      \,
 Micro Care Corp.
 34 Ronzo Road
 Bristol, CT 06010
 Tel: (203) 585-7912
 Fax:  (203) 585-7378
The Rission Group Inc.
 13349 Michigan Ave.
Dearborn, MI 48126
Tel: (313) 581-2620
Fax: (313) 581-3758

Selig Chemical Industries
PO Bos 43106
840 Selig Dr. SW
Atlanta, GA  30378
Tel: (404) 691-9220
Fax: (404) 699-7024

Ultrasound Fabrications, Inc.
1 Maple St.
Shelton, CT  06484
Tel: (203) 924-1624
Fax: (203) 924-1625

Zip-Chem Products
1860 Dobbin Dr.
San Jose,  CA 95133
Tel: (408) 729-0291
    (800)  648-2661
Fax: (408) 272-8062
Organic  intermediates, specialty monomers-polymers,
oligomers, etc.  MMB for metal cleaning applications.
Solvent cleaners based on  but not limited to terpene
hydrocarbon,   alcohol,   or  HCFC  technologies.
Formulations' are engineered for  use  in non-automated
hand cleaning applications where rinsing is not available.
Cleaners are effective in touch-up cleaning and precision
cleaning of all types of Ihix residues, oils, grease and
grime.

Aqueous  and  non-aqueous  formulations  containing
{surfactants   with   and   without   glycol   ethers.
Hydrocarbons  and  blends  of  hydrocarbons  with
emtilsifiers also available.
Formulations made  of hydrocarbons  and blends of
hydrocarbons and emulsiiiers. Also offer aqueous-based
formulations  containing detergents  with  and  without
glycol ethers and some containing d-limonene.
Ultrasonic parts washing systems  with standard  tank
volumes of 5, 10,20, and 30 gallons, as well as special
sizes  if  required.   Systems  provide for - ultrasonic
washing, spray or different -types of immersion rinsing
and hot air drying to achieve clean,  dry, spot free parts.

Aqueous, semi-aqueous  aliphatic hydrocarbon, terpene
and  alcohol-based  cleaners.    Application   oriented
packaging like wipes, aerosols, specialty containers, and
other delivery systems available.

-------
 SEMI-AQUEOUS
 EQUIPMENT
CLEANING
 ACCEL
 1825 E. Piano Parkway
 Piano, IX 75074-8129
 Tel: (214) 424-3525
 Fax: (214) 424-7526
 Altos Engineering, Inc.
 6009 N. 61 Ave
 Glendale,AZ  85301
 Tel: (602) 931-8434
 Fax: (602) 937-6396

 American Metal Wash, Inc.
 POBox265
 360 Euclid Ave.
 Cannonsburg, PA  15317
 Tel: (412) 7464203
 Fax:  (412) 746-5738
Baron-BIakeslee, Inc.
1500 West 16th St.
Long Beach, CA 90813
Tel: (800) 548-4422
Fax: (310) 491-1091

Blackstone Ultrasonics, Inc.
£ North Main St.
Jamestown, NY 14701
Tel: (716) 665-2620
    (800) 766-6606
Fax: (716) 665-2480

Blue Wave Ultrasonics
Div. of AJpheus Cleaning
  Technologies Corp.
960 S. RolffSt.
Davenport, 1A  52802
Tel: (319) 322-0144
    (800) 373.-0144
Fax: (319) 322-7180
                    System utilizing centrifugal cleaning to provide superior
                    washing, effective rinsing,  and drying of populated
                    printed circuit  boards  and  hybrid circuits.   Includes
                    automatic solvent recycling and rinse water purification
                    with no required drain.  Compatible with chlorocarbons,
                    fluorocarbons, H20, and terpenes.

                    Batch and inline cleaning equipment with* non-chemical,
                    thermal vacuum drying of  rinse waters.   Detergent
                    formulations available with and without glycol ethers.
                    Bearing washer for precision cleaning of final assembled
                    race bearings, including points of contact.  Equipment
                    can  be  provided  in  single  or   multi-stages  for
                    accommodations of washing, rinsing, rust inhibiting, and
                    thorough drying of each bearing.  Can accommodate
                    bearing diameters of 7/8" to 20* and can be setup for
                    use with aqueous or semi-aqueous cleaning solutions.

                    Full line of cleaning equipment for use with aqueous,
                    semi-aqueous, HCFC, and chlorinated solvents.  Closed
                    loop system incorporating vacuum drying available (near
                    zero emissions).
                    Complete range of ultrasonic cleaning products from
                    stand-alone and bench-top heated tanks to wash/multiple
                    rinse/dry console systems with optional material handling
                    and automation.  Also, fluxless ultrasonic solder pots for
                    tinning leads and electronics.
                    Ultrasonic   cleaning  equipment   built  for   various
                    applications specific to the customer's needs. Effective
                    in cleaning different products and materials throughout
                    the scope of fabricated metals, plastics, and ceramics.
                    Also   offer  aqueous-based  detergents  that   are
                    environmentally safe.

-------
 Branson Ultrasonics Inc.
 41 Eagle Rd.
TJanbury, CT 06810
 Tel: (203) 796-0400
 Fax: (203) 796-0381

 Cincinnati Industrial Machinery
 PO Box 62027
 3280 Hageman St.
 Cincinnati, OH  45241 (street add.)
                45262 (PO Box)
Tel: (513) 769-0700
 Fax:(513)769-0697

 Conceptronic, Inc.
 6 Post Rd.
 Portsmouth, NH 03801   ,
Tel: (603) 431-6262
Fax: (603) 431-3303
 Container Products Corp.
 PO Box 3767
 Wilmington, NC 28406
 Tel: (919) 392-6100
 Fax: (919) 392-6778

 Creative Enterprizes
 3560 Springwood, Suite 811
 Ponca City, OK 74604
 Tel: (405) 765-0879
 Fax: (405) 765-0879

 Crest Ultrasonics
 Scotch Rd, - Mercer County Airport
 PO Box 7266
 Trenton, NJ  08628
 Tel: (609) 883-4000
    (800) 441-9675
 Fax: (609) 883-6452

 DURR Industries,  Inc.
 10301 Enterprise Dr.           «
 Davisburg, MI 48360
Tel: (313) 625-5400
 Fax: (313) 625-5966
Ultrasonic cleaning equipment and integrated cleaning
systems for metal, electronic, and precision cleaning
requirements.   Manual and fully automated material
handling/transport systems.   Equipment  for  aqueous,
semi-aqueous and solvent chemistry.
Custom  designed  machines  for  cleaning,  si
preparation  and other processing of metal  and
metallic parts.
surface
  non-
iSenii-aqueous, spray-based, totally closed-loop modular
batch cleaning systems utilizing non-flammable, naturally
derived alcohol solvents in solution with water. Also
have an ultrasonic batch cleaning system for metallic and
non-metallic electronic surfaces and other difficult-to-
clean non-electronic pare, of unusual geometric shape.

Systems  incorporating  a variety, of aqueous cleaning
techniques  which  include  filtered  negative pressure
chambers, high pressure chambers, and mobile cleaning
systems.
Specialize in low cost conversion of existing facilities to
safely use alternative cleaning agents.  Design new or
custom cleaning equipment and processes.  Also design
environmentally secure drying equipment and processes.
Precision  cleaning  equipment  (primarily  ultrasonic
systems) from standard wash-rinse-dry cleaning consoles
to large custom automated batch cleaning equipment.
Ultrasonic  generator is sweep frequency  generator
capable of cavitating both  aqueous and  semi-aqueous
chemistries.   Full  line of aqueous-based  cleaning
chemistries for ultrasonic applications as well.

All aqueous and semi-aqueous systems recycle and reuse
process water.  Solvent systems reduce emissions by
99% over conventional degreasing systems.

-------
 Eeolink
 1481 Rock Mountain Blvd.
 Stone Mountain, GA  30083
 Tel: (404) 621-8240
        (800) 886-8240
 Fax: (404) 621-8245  ,

 .Electronic Controls Design, Inc.
 4287-A SE International Way
 MUwaukie, OR 97006
 Tel: (503) 659-6100
    (800) 323-4548
 Fix: (503) 659-4422

 Envirosolutions Inc.
 335 Post Road West
 Wesqx>rt,CT 06880
 Tel: (203) 454-5902
 Fax: (203) 222-0190
 Finishing Equipment Inc.
 3640 Kennebec Dr.
•St. Paul, MN 55122
 Tel: (612) 452-1860
 Fax: (612) 452-9851
Hurri-Kleen Corp.
POBox29
Ttussville, AL 35173
Tel: (205) 655-8808
Fax: (205) 655-5392

TfaeJ.M. Key Co.
Ney Industrial Park
Bloomfield, CT  06002
Tel: (203) 286-6149
Fax: (203) 242-5688

Kleer-Flo Company
15151 Technology Dr.
Eden Prairie, MN  55344
Tel: (612) 934-2555   '
    (800) 328-7942
Fax: (612) 934-3909
Wide range of aqueous, semi-aqueous and non-aqueous
chemistries.     Formulations  include  a variety  of
hydrocarbon, NMP, DBE and terpene products as well
as   non-ozone   depleting   halogenated   solvents.
Manufacture a complete line of batch cleaning units for
use with these solvents.
Biodegradable, non-caustic, neutral Ph cleaner which is
used in a closed loop parts washing system.  Several
different formulations developed to  suit a variety of
cleaning needs.  Customized parts washing equipment is
matched to the  cleaning chemicals to ensure optimum
performance.

Aqueous,  semi-aqueous and  solvent cleaning  systems
available.   From  manual systems to automated high-
production cleaning lines, with ultrasonics available as
needed.    Specialize  in  automated  enclosed vapor
degreasers for efficient use of the non-ozone depleting
chlorinated solvents.

-------
 Ransohoff Co.
 North 5th St at Ford Boulevard
 Hamilton,  OH 45011
 Tel: (513) 863-5813
    (800) 248-WASH
 Fax:(513)863-8908
 S&K Products International
 80 Red Schoolhouse Rd. #102
 Chestnut Ridge, NY  10977
 Tel: (914) 425-6200
 Fax: C?14) 425-760

 Smart Sonic Precision Cleaning Systems
 2373 Teller Rd., f 107
 Newbury Park, CA  91320
 Tel: (805) 499-7440
 Fax:  (805) 375-5781

 SONICOR Instrument Corp,
 100 Wartburg Ave.
 Copiague,  NY 11726
 Tel: (516)  842-3344
 Fax:  (516) 842-3389

 Sonitech Inc.
 239 East Stephenson St.
 Freeport, IL 61032
 Tel: (815)  235-2400
 Fax: (S15) 232-2150
Tiyoda MFG. U.S.A., Inc.
1613 Lockness Place
Torrance, CA 90501
Tel: (310) 539-5471
Fax: (310) 539-5881

Ultrasound Fabrications, Inc.
1 Maple St.
Shelton, CT  06484
Tel: (203) 924-1624
Fax: (203) 924-1625
Standard and custom aqueous and semi-aqueous cleaning
equipment  for small through  high production parts
cleaning requirements, as well as very small to large part
configurations and various part materials.  Expertise in
precision cleaning.    Patented,  mechanically agitated
aqueous technology for high volume intricately shaped
or machined parts as a direct replacement of solvent
vapor degreasing and ultrasonic cleaning systems.

Solvent wash followed by one or more aqueous rinses,
including formulated surfactants; men to spot tree, stain
free, partictdate free drying via isopropyl alcohol.
Automated ultrasonic  and spray  batch  cleaners  for
precision cleaning of metal, plastic, and ceramic parts.
Systems clean oils, paniculate and other contaminates.
Optional waste evaporator.
Ultrasonic  cleaning  equipment,  automated  aqueous
cleaning systems. Environmentally safe alternatives to
cleaning with hazardous solvents.
Ultrasonic cleaning  equipment using aqueous or semi-
aqueous chemistries for a wide range of applications.
Complete systems include cleaning tanks, rinse, tanks,
dryers and closed loop rinse water recirculation systems.
System uses alcohol or other solvents with perfluorinated
chemistry  for raising  and drying  non-water contact
applications.

Vacuum  desiring  ultrasonic  batch cleaning system
provides instantaneous cleaning solution penetration into
small tubes and holes and promotes superior cleaning.
Vacuum drying system  uses vacuum, hot air, ultra-pure
steam heating and far-infrared heater.

Ultrasonic  parts washing systems with standard tank
volumes of 5, 10,20, and 30 gallons, as well as special
sizes  if required.   Systems provide for  ultrasonic
washing, spray or different types  of immersion rinsing
and hot ah* drying to achieve clean, dry, spot free parts.

-------
 Unitech Industrial Inc."
 Pd Box 330
 16 South Ave,
 Wappingers Falls, NY  12590
 Tel: (914) 297-0745
    (800) 277-5522  ,
 Fax: (914) 297-2919

 Vitronics Corp.
 Forbes Rd.
 Newmarket Industrial Park
 New-market, NH 03857
 Tel: (603) 659-6550
 Fax: (603) 659-7194
Closed loop industrial cleaning systems. Spray washers,
batch  cleaning   systems,  vapor   decreasing,   and
pretreatraent systems available in new equipment and
retrofits.  Waste water treatment and recycling, 100% oil
removal from the cleaning process.
Inline aqueous and  semi-aqueous cleaning equipment
with closed loop water treatment systems.
 HYDROCARBON-BASED SOLVENTS

 Advanced Research Technologies
 312 South Vine St.
 Park Ridge, IL 60068
 Tel: (708) 696-9371
 FAX: (708) 696-4984

 ARCO Chemical Co.
 3801 West Chester Pike,
 Newtown Square, PA 19073-2387
 Tel: (215) 359-2441
 Fax: (215) 359-5753

 Ardrox Inc.
 16951 Knott Avenue
 La Mirada, CA 90638
 Tel: (714) 739-2821
 Fax: (714) 670-6480
                      »
 BASF Corp.
 100 Cherry Hill Rd.
 Parsippany,  NJ 07054

 The Bnil in Corporation
 PO Box 270
2920 Dr. Andrew J. Brown Ave.*  -
 Indianapolis, IN  46206
Tel: (317) 923-3211
 Fax: (317) 925-4596
Ultra-low  residue, high purity terpene  hydrocarbon
cleaning agents. Used in vapor decreasing applications
for metals cleaning, electronics cleaning, and precision
cleaning.
Full range  of aqueous-based formulations as well as
aliphatic  hydrocarbon-based  blends,  terpene-based
formulations, hydrocarbon-based  solvent  blends  and
other cleaning alternatives and equipment.
Advanced technology aqueous detergent  systems, for
spray,  immersion,  ultrasonic,  and  passive  process
cleaning of fabricated metal or plastic parts.

-------
 Chemical Solvents, Inc. *
 3751 Jennings Rd.
 Cleveland, OH 44109
 Tel: (216) 741-9310
    (800) 362-0693
 Fax: (216) 741-4080

 Chem-Tech International
 1800 Diagonal Rd., Suite 600
 Alexandria, VA 22314
 Tel: (703) 549-1001
 Fax: (703) 549*1003
 Cbemtronics, Inc.
 8125 Cobb Center Dr.
 Kennesaw, GA 30144
 Tel: (404) 424^888
 Fax: (404) 424-4267

 CRC Industries, Inc.
 885 Louis Dr.
 Warminster, PA  18974
 Tel: (215) 674-4300         ,
 Fax: (215) 674-2196

 Creative Enterprizes
 3560 Springwood, Suite 811
 Ponca City, OK 74604
 Tel: (405) 765-0879
 Fax: (405) 765-0879

 Detrex Corp.
 4000 Town Center, Suite 1100
 Southfield, MI  48175
 Tel: (313) 358-5800
 Fax: (313) 358-5803
Ecolink
1481 Rock Mountain Blvd.
Stone Mountain, GA 30083
Tel: (404) 621-8240
       (800) 886-8240
Fax: .(404) 621-8245
Aqueous-based formulations containing detergents with
and  without glycol  ethers  as well  as  blends  of
hydrocarbons and emulsifiers which,  when  used in
combination, provide residue-free cleaning.' Can be used
on all metals, teflon, plastic, and painted coatings. Also
specially designed cleaning equipment. ,

Ultra-pure cleaners for electronics and metals.
Mixtures of hydrocarbon solvents  with  and without
glycpl ethers. Package types include aerosols and bulk.
Specialize in low cost conversion of existing facilities to
safely use alternative cleaning agents.  Design new or
custom cleaning equipment and processes.  Also design
environmentally secure drying equipment and processes.
Aqueous  micro-emulsion  solution  for  gross  metal
cleaning and  equipment for  use with  the  cleaning
solution. Alternative/vapor degreasing process, specialty
equipment and  solvents for  metals  and  electronics
cleaning, chlorinated and HCFC solvents, and aqueous
and semi-aqueous solvents.

Wide range of aqueous, semi-aqueous and non-aqueous
chemistries.    Formulations  include  a  variety  of
hydrocarbon, NMP, DBE and terpene products as well
as   non-ozone   depleting   halogenated   solvents.
Manufacture a complete line of batch cleaning units for
use with these solvents.

-------
 Electrolube Corporation USA
 8200 Saint James Ave.
 Bmtost, NY 11373
 Td; (718) 565-5200
 Fax:(718)565-5715

 Environmental Recovery Resources, Inc.
 POBox36
 South Salem, NY  10590
 Td: (914) 533-6175
 Fax: (914) 533-6275
 Enviro Tech International
 2201 Clement Ave. #43
 Alaraeda, CA 94501-1487
 Td: (510) 436-7603
 Fax:(510)436-7345
 ETUS, Inc.
 1511 Kastner Place
 Sanford, FL 32771
 Td:(407) 321-7910
 Fax: (407) 321-3098

 EXXON Chemical Co.
 PO Box 3272
 Houston, TX 77253-3272
 Td: (800) 526-0749
 Fax: (713) 870-6661
Fine Organics Corp.
205 Main St.   ,
PO Box 687
Lodi, NJ  07644-0687
Tel: (201) 472-6800
    (800)  526-7480
Fax: (201) 472-6810

International Specialty Products
1361 Alps'Rd.
Wayne, NJ  07470
Tel: (201) 628-3000
Fax:(210)628-4117
Non-toxic,  non-flammable,  biodegradable  aqueous
solvents suitable for in-line and batch equipment without
modification.  Also ideal for screen and pallet cleaning
and  precision  metal  degreasing (ferrous  and  non-
ferrous).

Floating,   dispersed,    and  dissolved  'hydrocarbon
contaminants removed to surface water discharge limits,
using:  no coalescing plates, no centrifugal, no carbon
absorption, no sorbent waste.  Also offer systems and
services to extend cleaning bath 'life* for more  cost
effective aqueous systems and waste water processing,
and  waste-minimized   settling-pond  and   separator
maintenance/remediation.

Non-flammable, drop-in replacement solvent for vapor
degreasing  of  metals,  electronics,  and  precision
components. Leaves no residue. Requires no additional
cleaning.  For use in existing vapor degreasers.  Also,
cold or  wipe cleaning  applications of metals,  high
voltage circuits,  oxygen system cleaning, and  spot
cleaning of electronics.

Formulations made of  hydrocarbons and  blends of
hydrocarbons and emulsifiers. Also offer aqueous-based
formulations containing detergents with  and without
glycol ethers.
Cleaners comprised of narrow boiling range, high flash
point aliphatic hydrocarbons.  Low olefm and aromatic
content.  Low residue, low corrosivity to metals, low
odor,  low toxicity.   Require  no  water  handling,
recyclable by distillation. Effective against a wide range
of waxes,  oils and greases found in metal and precision
cleaning.

Non-hazardous and biodegradable solvent and solvent-
emulsion based alternatives.  Products are applicable to
the transportation, aviation, electronics, and coatings
industries. Also offer water-based alternative products.
Specialty solvents comprised of N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone
(NMP) and gamma-butyrolactone (BLO) as well as other
proprietary ingredients.  Products are biodegradable,
water soluble, and recyclable.
                                              32

-------
    Industries
 195 E. Main St., Suite 303
 Milford, MA 01757
 Tel: (800) 554-9994
 Fax:(508)478-2221

 Micro Care Corp.
 34 Ronzo Road.
 Bristol, CT 06010
 Tel: (203) 585-7912
 Fax: (203) 585-7378
 North American Environmental Oil
  & Cleaning Supply Company
 270A Route 46, Suite 81
 Rockaway, NJ 07866
 Tel: aOl) 627-0722
    (201) 627-1503
 Fax: (201) 627-2982

 Occidental Chemical Corp.
 Technical Center
 PO Box 344
 Niagara Falls, NY  14302
 Tel: (800) 733-1165
 Fax: (716) 278-7297

 Petrofenn Inc.
 5415 First Coast Highway
 Fernandina Beach, FL 32034
 Tel: (904) 261-8286
 Fax: (904) 261-6994
P-T Technologies, Inc.
108 4th Ave. South
Safety Harbor, FL  34695
Tel: (800) 441-7874
Fax: (813) 726-9544

QO Chemicals.Inc.
PO Box 2500
2801 Kent Ave.
West Lafayette, IN 47906
Tel: (317) 497-6100
Manufacturer of eight non-CFC formulations including
a supersaturated wipe solvent.
Solvent cleaners based on but not limited to  terpene
hydrocarbon,   alcohol,   or  HCFC   technologies.
Formulations are engineered for use in non-automated
hand cleaning applications; where rinsing is not available.
Cleaners are effective in touch-up cleaning and precision
cleaning of all types of flux residues, oils, grease and
grime.
Specially stabilized methylene chloride for a wide variety
of applications.  Formulations of halogenated toluenes
and benzotrifluorides for cold cleaning of metals and
electronics.  Ethyiene biased  glycol ethers for use in
maiay cleaning formulations.
Broad line of formulations based on terpenes, ester, and
aliphatic hydrocarbons and blends of these organic
solvents with surfactant;.  Products are used for cold
(hand) cleaning and in combination with various cleaning
equipment.  Products cm be removed by evaporation,
water, alcohols or nonflammable fluorinated  solvents.
Both products and rinse media can be recycled.

Nonhalogenated  hydrocarbon-based and  water based
degreasers  and cleaner*.   Specialty formulations  for
electronics,  cable manufacturing,  process  cleaning,
utility applications general cleanup.

-------
 The Rission Group Inc."
 13349 Michigan Ave.
 Dearborn, MI  48126
 Tel; (313) 581-2620
 Fax; (313) 581-3758

 Rochester Midland Corp.
 333 Hollenbcck St.
 Rochester, NY 14621
 Tel: (716) 336-2200
 Fax: (716) 467-4406
 Selig Chemica] Industries
 PO Box 43106
 840 Selig Dr. SW
 Atlanta, GA 30378
 Tel: (404) 691-9220
 Fax: (404) 699-7024

 Storchem Inc.
 3600 Billings Court, Suite 110
 Burlington, Ontario
 Canada L7N3N6
Terpene Technologies Inc.
3400 Ridge Rd. W, Suite 293
Rochester, NY 14626
Tel: (716) 546-8455
    (716) 777-0790
Fax: (716) 227-3834

Thierica
900 Clancy Ave.
Grand Rapids, MI 49503
Tel: (616) 458-1538
Fax: (616) 458-7120

Union Camp  Corp.
Bush Boake Allen Division
PO Box 37617
Jacksonville,  FL  32236
Tel: (904) 783-2180
    (800)  874-9220
Fax: (904) 786-6495
Aqueous  and  non-aqueous  formulations  containing
surfactants   with   and   without   glycol   ethers.
Hydrocarbons  and  blends  of  hydrocarbons  with
emulsifiers also available.
Formulations comprised of hydrocarbon and/or terpene
solvents. Some also contain surfactants.  Many contain
alkaline builders and chelants as 'well as glycol ethers.
Some aqueous-based or water-compatible formulations
exhibit good biodegradability. Many products allow for
good oil/grease separation upon standing.

Formulations made  of hydrocarbons and  blends of
hydrocarbons and emulsifiers. Also offer aqueous-based
formulations  containing detergents  with  and without
glycol ethers and some containing d-limonene.
Aqueous-based   terpene   formulations  containing
detergents and emulsifiers; semi-aqueous cleaners and
degreasers based on terpene alcohols and hydrocarbons;
terpene alcohol and hydrocarbon blends used as non-
water soluble solvents.

Terpene alcohol  and hydrocarbon blends used as non-
water  soluble solvents,  semi-aqueous  cleaners  and
degreasers based on terpene alcohols and hydrocarbons.
Also offer aqueous-based terpene formulations containing
detergents and emulsifiers.
New  low cost spray  equipment manages extremely
difficult cleaning jobs.  Used with large and small parts
containing baked grease and paint soils.  Designed to be
safe and environmentally secure with hydrocarbon and
aqueous cleaning agents.  Stainless steel construction.
          i
Range of wood terpene-based alternative solvents for
semi-aqueous and solvent only cleaning processes and
maintenance cleaning applications." High solvency and
high soil loading properties for removal of solder fluxes,
heavy   oils  and   greases,   polishing   compounds,
carbonaceous deposits  etc. to the highest cleanliness
standards.

-------
W.R. Grace & Co.
Metal working Fluids Group
55 Hayden Ave.
Lexington, MA 02173
Tel: (617) 861-6600
Fax: (617) 861-6600

Zip-Chem Products
1860 Dobbin Dr.
San Jose, CA 95133
Tel: (408) 729-0291
    (800) 648-2661
Fax: (408) 272-8062
Wide range of aqueous claming formulations for metal,
precision,  and  maintenance  cleaning.*    Includes
formulations mat are phosphate-free.    Suitable for
agitation, soak, spray, ultrasonic and hand wipe
applications.
Aqueous, semi-aqueous aliphatic hydrocarbon, terpene
and  alcohol-based cleaners.    Application oriented
packaging like wipes, aerosols, specialty containers, and
other delivery systems available.        ''
 NON-OZONE DEPLETING
  CHLORINATED SOLVENTS

 Asahi Glass America, Inc.
 450 Lexington Ave., Suite 1920
 New York, NY  10017-3911
 Tel: (212) 687-4600
 Fax: (212) 687-4663

 Chemical Solvents, Inc.
 3751 Jennings Rd.
 Cleveland, OH  44109
 Tel: (216) 741-9310
    (800) 362-0693
 Fax: (216) 741-4080

 Chemtronics, Inc.
 8125 Cobb Center Dr.
 Kennesaw, GA  30144
Tel: (404) 424-4888
 Fax: (404) 424-4267

 Container Products Corp.
 PO Box 3767
 Wilmington, NC 28406
Tel: (919) 392-6100
 Fax: (919) 392-6778

 Detrex Corp.
4000 Town Center, Suite 1100
 Southfield, Ml  48175
Tel: (313) 358-5800
 Fax: (313) 358-5803
Metliylene chloride for general metals, electronics and
precision cleaning.
Ultra-pure cleaners for electronics and metals.
Systems incorporating a variety of aqueous  cleaning
techniques  which include filtered  negative  pressure
chambers, high pressure chambers, and mobile cleaning
systems.
Aqueous micro-emulsion  solution for  gross metal
cleaning and equipment  for use with  the  cleaning
solution. Alternative/vapor degreasing process, specialty
equipment  and .solvents  for metals, and  electronics
cleaning, chlorinated arid HCFC solvents, and aqueous
and semi-aqueous solvents.

-------
 Dow U.S.A.
 Midland, MI  48674
 Tel: (800) 337-4369
 Fax: (517) 832-1465

 Ecolink
 1481 Rock Mountain Blvd.
 Stone Mountain, GA  30083
 Tel: (404) 621-8240
        (800)886-8240
 Fax: (404) 621-8245

 Electrolube Corporation USA
 8200 Saint James Ave.
 Elmhurst, NY 11373
 Tel: (718) 565-5200
 Fax: (718) 565-5715

 Hubbard-Hall, Inc.
 PO Box, 790
 Waterbury, CT  06725
 Tel: (203)754-2171
    (800) 648-3412
 Fax: (203) 596-9544
    (203) 756-9017

 Occidental Chemical Corp.
 Technical Center
 PO Box 344
 Niagara Falls, NY  14302
 Tel: (800) 733-1165
 Fax: (716) 278-7297

 Rochester Midland Corp.
 333 Hollenbeck St.
 Rochester, NY 14621
 Tel: (716) 336-2200
 Fax: (716) 467-4406
Selig Chemical Industries
PO Box 43106
840 Selig Dr. SW
Atlanta, GA 30378
Tel: (404) 691-9220
Fax: (404) 699-7024
Trichloroethylene,   methyl ene   chloride,  and
perchloroethylene.
Wide range of aqueous, semi-aqueous and non-aqueous
chemistries.     Formulations  include  a  variety  of
hydrocarbon, NMP, DBE and terpene products as well
as   non-ozone   depleting   halogenated  solvents.
Manufacture a complete line of batch cleaning units for
use with these solvents.    •            '

Non-toxic,   non-flammable,,  biodegradable  aqueous
solvents suitable for in-line and batch equipment without
modification. Also ideal for screen and pallet cleaning
and  precision  metal  degreasing  (ferrous  and  non-
ferrous).
Specially stabilized methylene chloride for a wide variety
of applications.  Formulations of halogenated toluenes
and benzotrifluorides for cold cleaning of metals and
electronics.  Ethylene based giycol ethers for use in
many cleaning formulations.
Formulations comprised of hydrocarbon and/or terpene
solvents. Some also contain surfactants.  Many contain
alkaline builders and chelants as well as giycol ethers.
Some aqueous-based or water-compatible formulations
exhibit good biodegradability. Many products allow for
good oil/grease separation upon standing.

Formulations made  of  hydrocarbons and  blends, of
hydrocarbons and emulsifiers. Also offer aqueous-based
formulations containing  detergents  with and without
giycol ethers and some containing d-limonene.

-------
Zip-Chem Products
1860 Dobbin Dr.
San lose, CA  95133
Tel: (408) 729-0291
        (800)648-2661
Fax: (408) 272-8062
Aqueous, semi-aqueous aliphatic hydrocarbon, terpene
and  alcohol-based  cleaners.    Application  oriented
packaging like wipes, aerosols, specialty containers, and
other delivery systems available.
HCFCS

Allied-Signal
POBoxll39R
Morristown, NJ  07960
Tel: (201) 455-4848
Fax: (201) 455-2745

Asahi Glass America, Inc.
450 Lexington Ave., Suite 1920
New York, NY  10017-3911
Tel: (212) 687-4600 ,
Fax: (212) 687-4663

Atochem North America
Three Parkway
Philadelphia, PA  19102
Tel: (215) 587-7192
Fax: a 15) 587-7199

Chemtronics, Inc.
8125 Cobb Center Dr.
Kennesaw, GA 30144
Tel: (404) 424-4888
Fax: (404) 424-4267

CRC Industries, Inc.
885 Louis Dr.
Warminster, PA  18974
Tel: (215) 674-4300
Fax: (215) 674-2196

Detrex Corp,
4000 Town Center, Suite 1100
Southfield, MI 48175
Tel: (313) 358-5800
Fax: (313) 358-5803
HCFC-225ca/cb can be uued as a single product as well
as an alcohol mixture or with surface active agents.
Compatible with most metals and plastics, and applicable
for degreasing, defluxing, particle-removing, drying and
dry-cleaning, with low total energy consumption.
Ultra-pure cleaners for electronics and metals.
Aerosol and bulk packages of HCFCs.  Nonflammable
and leaves  no residue.  May not be compatible with
some plastics such as polycarbonates and polystyrene.
Aqueous micro-emulsion  solution  for  gross metal*
cleaning  and equipment  for use with  the  cleaning
solution. Alternative/vapor degreasing process, specialty
equipment  and  solvents  for metals and  electronics
cleaning, chlorinated and HCFC solvents, and aqueous
and semi-aqueous solvents.

-------
 Ecolink   *
 1481-Rock Mountain Blvd.
 Stone Mountain, GA  30083 .
 Tel: (404) 621-8240
        (800) 886-8240
 Fax: (404) 621-8245  ..

 Electrolube Corporation USA
 8200 Saint James Ave.
 Bmhurst, NY  inn
 Td: (718) 565-5200
 Fax: (718) 565-5715

 Micro Care Corp.
 34RonzoRoad
 Bristol, CT 06010
 Td: (203) 585-7912
 Fax: (203) 585-7378
 Sdig Chemical Industries
 840SdigDr. SW
 Atlanta, GA  30336-2240
 Td: (404) 691-9220
 Fax: (404) 699-7024
Wide range of aqueous, semi-aqueous and non-aqueous
chemistries.     Formulations  include  a  variety  of
hydrocarbon, NMP, DBE and terpene products as wdl
as   non-ozone   depleting  halogenated   solvents.
Manufacture a complete line of batch cleaning units for
use with these solvents.

Non-toxic,   non-flammable,  biodegradable  aqueous
solvents suitable for in-line and batch equipment without
modification. Also ideal for screen and pallet cleaning
and  precision   metal  degreasing  (ferrous  and  non-
ferrous).

Solvent cleaners based on but not limited  to  terpene
hydrocarbon,   alcohol,   or  HCFC   technologies.
Formulations are engineered for  use  in non-automated
hand cleaning applications where rinsing is not available.
Cleaners are effective hi touch-up cleaning and precision
cleaning of all types of flux residues, oils, grease and
grime.

Formulations made of hydrocarbons and  blends  of
hydrocarbons and emulsifiers. Also offer aqueous-based
formulations containing  detergents with  and  without
glycol ethers and some containing d-limonene.
 OTHER CLEANING ALTERNATIVES
  AMD EQUIPMENT

 3D, Inc.   .
 2053 Plaza Drive
 Benton Harbor, MI 49022-2211
 Td: (800) 272-4326
 Fax: (616) 925-1922

 3M Company
 Specialty Chemicals Division
 Building 223-65-04
 St. Paul, MN  55144
Td: (612) 733-3735
    (800) 833-5045

ACCEL
 1825 E. Piano Parkway
Piano,  TX  75074-8129
Td: (214) 424-3525
Fax:(214)424-7526
Perfluorocarbon-based fluids used as rinsing materials in
specialty niche cleaning applications.  These fluids are
especially designed for cleaning processes for high-value
parts when aqueous or semi-aqueous  cleaning are not
viable options.
System utilizing centrifugal cleaning to provide superior
washing, effective rinsing, and  drying  of populated
printed  circuit boards and hybrid circuits.  Includes
automatic solvent recycling and rinse water  purification
with no required drain. Compatible with chlorocarbons,
fluorocarbons, H2Q, and terpenes.

-------
 Altos Engineering, Inc."
 6009 N. 61 Ave
 Glendale, AZ 85301
 Tel: (602) 931-8434
 Fax:  (602) 937-63%

 Ambassador Marketing
 Route 1-Box 207
 St. David, AZ 85630
 Tel: (602) 120-4310
 Fax:  (602) 720-4068

 Ardrox Inc.
 16961 Knott Avenue
 La Mirada, CA  90638
 Tel: (714) 739-2821
 Fax:  (714) 670-6480

 Baron-Blakeslee, Inc.
 1500 West 16th St.
 Long Beach, CA 90813
 Tel: (800) 548-4422
 Fax:  (310) 491-1091

 Branson Ultrasonics Inc.
41 Eagle Rd.
 Danbury, CT  06810
 Tel: (203) 796-0400
 Fax: (203) 796-0381

 CF TECHnologies, Inc.
 1 Westinghouse Plaza, Suite 200
 Hyde Park, MA 02136-2059
Tel: (617) 364-2500
Fax: (617) 364-2550

Chem-Tech International
 1800 Diagonal Rd., Suite 600
Alexandria, VA  22314
Tel: (703) 549-1001
Fax: (703) 549-1003
Church & Dwight Co., Inc.
469 N. Harrison St.
Princeton, NJ 08543-5297
Tel: (609) 497-7230
Batch and inline cleaning equipment with non-chemical,
thermal vacuum drying of rinse waters.  Detergent
formulations available with; and without glycol ethers.
Aqueous and alcohol-based  cleaners for low  residue
degreiasing and dewaxing applications. Formulations are
nonflammable and nonfuming.
Full range of aqueous-based formulations as well as
aliphatic  hydrocarbon-based  blends,   terpene-based
formulations, hydrocarbon-based  solvent  blends  and
other cleaning alternatives and equipment.
Full line of cleaning equipment for use with aqueous,
semi-aqueous, HCFC, and chlorinated solvents.  Closed
loop system incorporating 'vacuum drying available (near
zero emissions).
Ultrasonic cleaning equipment and integrated cleaning
systems for metal,  electronic, and precision cleaning
requirements.   Manual  and fully automated material
handling/transport systems.   Equipment for aqueous,
semi-aqueous and solvent chemistry.

Supercritical  fluid  extraction  cleaning  process  for
removing organic solvent,  oil and lubricant residues.
May also be effective for paniculate removal when used
in conjunction with agitation and/or ultrasonics.
Aqueous-based formulations containing detergents with
and  without glycol  ethers  as well  as  blends  of
hydrocarbons and emulsifiers which,  when  used in
combination, provide residue-free cleaning. Can be used
on all metals, teflon, plascic, and painted coatings. Also
specially designed cleaning equipment.

-------
 Cincinnati Industrial Machinery
 PO Box 62027
 3280 Hageman St.
 Cincinnati, OH  45241 (street add.)
                 45262 (P0 Box)
 Tel: (513) 769-0700   ,
 Fax: (513) 769-0697

 Circle-Prosco, Inc.
 2017 Yost Ave.
 Bloomington, IN 47403
 Tel: (812) 339-3653
 Fax: (812) 331-2566
Custom  designed  machines   for  cleaning,   si
preparation and other processing of metal and
metallic parts.
surface
  non-
 Cold Jet, Inc.
 455 Wards Corner Rd.
 Lovdand, OH 45140
 Tel: (513)831-3211
 Fax; (513)831-1209
Conceptronic, Inc.
6 Post Rd.   ,
Portsmouth, NH  03801
Tel: (603) 431-6262
Fax:(603)431-3303
Container Products.Corp.
PO Box 3767
Wilmington, NC 28406
Tel: (919) 392-6100
Fax: (919) 392-6778

Creative Enterprises
3560 Springwood, Suite 811
Ponca City, OK 74604
Tel: (405) 765-0879
Fax: (405) 765-0879
Aqueous, alkaline, etchant cleaners for ferrous and non-
ferrous applications.   Aqueous, acidic, neutral,  and
alkaline oil rejecting  cleaners with or without glycol
ethers for ferrous and non-ferrous applications. Water
miscible, semi-aqueous cleaners (electronics cleaning).
Water emulsifiable cleaners containing  aliphatic  and
terpene solvents.    Evaporative  oils for  no  clean
applications.

Dry ice blasting process using small pellets of carbon
dioxide (dry ice) as the blasting media.  Pellets sublimate
on contact leaving no media for containment or disposal.
Process  currently being  used  in molded products,
baking/food production, hazardous cleaning, automotive,
aerospace  (military  and   commercial)   and  contract
cleaning industries.

Semi-aqueous, spray-based, totally closed-loop modular
batch cleaning systems utilizing non-flammable, naturally
derived alcohol solvents in solution with water.  Also
have an ultrasonic batch cleaning system for metallic and
non-metallic electronic surfaces and other  difficulHo-
clean non-electronic parts of unusual geometric shape.

Systems  incorporating a variety of aqueous  cleaning
techniques  which  include filtered negative  pressure
chambers, high pressure chambers, and mobile cleaning
systems.
Specialize in low cost conversion of existing facilities to
safely use alternative cleaning agents.  Design new or
custom cleaning equipment and processes. Also design
environmentally secure drying equipment and processes.

-------
 Crest Ultrasonics
 Scotch Rd. - Mercer County Airport
 PO Box 7266
 Trenton, HI  08628
 Tel: (609) 883-4000
    (800) 441-9675   .
 Fax: (609) 883-6452

 DEFLEXCorp.
 631 Roberta Ave.
 Glendale, CA 91201
 Tel: (818) 241-7500
 Fax: (818) 241-7532

 Dell-Chem of Arizona
 7119 E. Shea Blvd., Suite 106-224 .
 Scottsdale, AZ 85254
 Tel: (602) 951-5812
 Fax: (602) 948-4172

 Dow Corning  Corp.
 PO Box 994
 Midland,  MI  48686-0994
 Tel: (517) 486-4000
 Fax: (517)496-4511

 DURR Industries, Inc.
 10301 Enterprise Dr.
 Davisburg, MI 48350
 Tel: (313) 625-5400
 Fax: (313) 625-5966

 Ecolink
 1481 Rock Mountain Blvd.
 Stone Mountain, GA 30083
 Tel: (404) 621-8240
        (800)886-8240
 Fax: (404) 621-8245

 Electronic Controls Design Inc.
4287-A  SE International Way
 Milwaukie, OR  97006
Tel: (503) 659-6100
    (800)  323-4548
Fax: (503) 659-4422
Precision  cleaning  equipment (primarily  ultrasonic
systems) from standard wash-rinse-dry cleaning consoles
to large custom automated batch cleaning equipment.
Ultrasonic  generator  is  sweep  frequency generator
capable of cavitating both aqueous and semi-aqueous
chemistries.   Full line of  aqueous-based cleaning
chemistries for ultrasonic applications as well.

Energized supercritical fluids.   Gross and precision
cleaning machines which accept most standard baskets
and loads to 250 Ibs for cleaning a variety of products.
Other products include dense fluid recycling systems and
various racks/fixtures.

Aqueous and alcohol-based cleaners for  low residue
degreasing and dewaxing applications. Formulations are
nonflammable and nonfuming.
Volatile methyl siloxane (VMS) fluids containing no
additives.  Effective in removing cutting fluids, greases,
body oils, and particles in cleaning of precision parts and
metals.  Easily recyclable by distillation an/or filtration.
All aqueous and semi-aqueous systems recycle and reuse
process water.  Solvent systems reduce emissions  by
99% over conventional degreasing systems.
Wide range of aqueous, semi-aqueous and non-aqueous
chemistries.     Formulations  include  a  variety  of
hydrocarbon, NMP, DBE and terpene products as well
as   non-ozone   depleting   halogenated   solvents.
Manufacture a complete line of batch cleaning units for
use with these solvents.

-------
 Environmental Solvents'Corp.
 1840 Southside Blvd.
 Jacksonville, FL 32216
 Td: (904) 724-1990
 Fix: C904) 724-2508
                      ».
 EnviroPro Technologies
 POBoxSQSl
 2930 West 22nd St.
 Brie, PA  16512
 Td: (814) 838-5888
 Fax: (814) 833*0145

 Envirosolutions Inc.
 335 Post Road West
 Westport,  CT  06880
 Td: (203) 454-5902
 Fax: (203) 222-0190
 Exxon Chemical Co.
 PO Box 3272
 Houston, TX 77253-3272
 Tel: (800) 526-0749
 Fax: (713) 870-6661
Finishing Equipment Inc.
3640 Kennebec Dr.
St. Paul, MN 55122
Tel: (612) 452-1860
Fax:(612)452-9851
FMT Inc. (Findlay Machine & Tool)
1950 Industrial Dr.
Findlay, OH 4584O
Tel: (419) 422-0768
    (800)878-8011
Fax: (419) 422-0072
                               *
Fremont Industries, Inc.
4400 Valley Industrial Park  -
Shakopee, MN 55379
Tel: (612) 445-4121
Fax: (612) 496-3027
Coniferous (pine) terpene alternatives to hydrocarbon-
based solvent cleaning.  Can be used in single cold
immersion or in solvent-wash/solvent rinse/dry process
for water-free precision cleaning and defluxing.  ,'
One step cleaning system using supercritical carbon
dioxide.
Biodegradable, non-caustic, neutral pH cleaner which is
used in a closed loop parts washing system.  Several
different formulations developed to suit  a variety of
cleaning needs.  Customized parts washing equipment is
matched to the cleaning chemicals  to ensure optimum
performance.

Acetate ester cleaners, as well as hydrocarbon fluid
components  with a broad range of properties available
for use in blended formulations.  Low residue, low
corrosivity to  metals.  Effective for broad range of
grimes (electronics).  Formulations comprised of esters
and  hydrocarbon components effective in removing
greases, oils and waxes found  in metal, electronics, and
precision cleaning.

Aqueous,  semi-aqueous and solvent cleaning systems
available.   From manual systems to automated high-
production cleaning lines, with ultrasonics  available as
needed.   Specialize  in  automated enclosed  vapor
degreasers for efficient use of the non-ozone depleting
chlorinated solvents.

Custom engineered parts cleaning equipment, standard
parts   cleaning  equipment,  and   pollution   control
equipment.
Aqueous-based metal cleaning and non-metallic substrate
cleaning   formulations  and  application  equipment.
Includes spray, soak, and ultrasonic cleaners in rinse and
no-rinse formulations.

-------
 GaSonicsflPC
 2730 Junction Ave.
 San Jose, CA 95134-1909
 Tel: (408) 944-0212
 Fax:(408)473-9530
Hurricane Systems, Inc.
2080 Brooklyn Rd.
PO Box 867
Jackson, MI  49204
Tel: (517) 787-3481
Fax: (517) 787-2349
Insitu Environmental Chemical Co.
8402 East Redwing Rd.
Scottsdale, AZ 85250-5740
Tel: (602) 948-9209
Fax: (602) 951-0715

International Specialty Products
1361 Alps Rd.
Wayne, NJ  07470
Tel: (201) 628-3000
Fax:(210)628-4117

JnJ Industries
195 E. Main St.
Suite 303
Milford, MA 01757
Tel: (800) 554^9994
Fax: (508) 478-2221

KLN Ultraschall GmbH
Siegfriedstr. 124
EM»148 Heppenheim
Germany
Tel: 6252/14-0
Fax: 6262/14-277

Lewis Corp.                    *
102 Willenbrock Rd.
Oxford, CT 06478-1033
Tel: (203) 264-3100
Fax: (203) 264-3102
Low  temperature  plasma  • (RF   discharge)
equipment/process utilizes industrial grade gases such as
oxygen,  ah*, and  nitrogen or combinations  thereof.
Highly effective on all materials and widely used in
electronic device cleaning,  flux/solder  removal  and
medical device cleaning.

Wide range of "off-the-shelf, semi-custom, and custom
parts, cleaning  systems  using  water-based  cleaning
compounds.  Systems include: belt, rotary and overhead
conveyors for continuous and batch processing; carousel,
cabinet, and agitation tank washers;  multi-stage wash,
rinse, oxidation inhibit, aind  dry; oil removal and oil
slamming devices;  electric,  gas,  and  steam  heat
packages.

Aqueous and alcohol-based cleaners for  low residue
degreasing and dewaxing implications. Formulations are
nonflammable and nonfuming.
Specialty solvents comprised of N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone
(NMP) and gamma-butyrolactone (BLO) as well as other
proprietary- ingredients.   Products  are biodegradable,
water soluble, and recyclable.
Manufacturer of eight non-CFC formulations including
a supersaturated wipe solvent.
Manufacturer of industrial cleaning systems, specializing
in aqueous-based chemistries.  Bom ultrasonic and non-
ultrasonic washers available.

-------
 Liquid Carbonic Supercritical
 966 .Postal Rd.
 AHentown, PA  18103
 Tel: (215) 266-9693
 Fax: (215) 266-1482

 Micro Care Corp.
 34RonzoRoad
 Bristol, CT 06010
 Tel: (203) 585-7912
 Fax: (203) 585-7378
 North American Environmental Oil
  & Cleaning Supply Company
 270A Route 46, Suite Bl
 Rockaway, NJ 07866
 Tel: (201) 627-0722
  • (201)627-1503
 Fax: (201) 627-2982

 Occidental Chemical Corp.
 Technical Center
 PO Box 344.
 Niagara Falls, NY  14302
 Td: (800) 733-1165
 Fax: (716) 278-7297

 Petrofenn Inc.
 5415 First Coast Highway
 Fernandina Beach, FL 32034
 Tel: (904) 261-8286
 Fax: (904) 261-6994
Ransohoff Co.
North 5th St at Ford Boulevard
Hamilton, OH 45011
Tel: (513) 863-5813
    (800) 248-WASH
Fax: (513) 863-8908
Supercritical  carbon dioxide cleaning technology and
equipment.   Closed loop or open loop recirculation
systems effectively  remove organic material from the
component to be cleaned.
Solvent cleaners based on  but not limited  to  terpene
hydrocarbon,   alcohol,  or  HCFC   technologies.
Formulations are engineered for use in non-automated
hand cleaning applications where rinsing is not available.
Cleaners are effective in touch-up cleaning'and precision
cleaning of all types of flux residues, oils, grease and
grime.
Specially stabilized methylene chloride for a wide variety
of applications.  Formulations of halogenated toluenes
and benzotrifluorides for cold cleaning of metals and
electronics.  Ethylene based  glycol ethers for use in
many cleaning formulations.
Broad line of formulations based on terpenes, ester, and
aliphatic hydrocarbons and  blends  of these organic
solvejts with surfactants.  Products are used for cold
(hand) cleaning and in combination with various cleaning
equipment.  Products can be removed by evaporation,
water, alcohols or nonflammable fluorinated solvents.
Both products and rinse media can be recycled.

Standard and custom aqueous and semi-aqueous cleaning
equipment  for  small  through  high  production  parts
cleaning requirements, as well as very small to large part
configurations  and various part materials.  Expertise in
precision cleaning.   Patented, mechanically agitated
aqueous technology for high volume intricately shaped
or machined parts as a direct  replacement of solvent
vapor degreasing and ultrasonic cleaning systems.

-------
R.G. Hanson Co., Inc. *
703 E. Lincoln
Bloomington, IL 61701
Tel: (309) 828-5070
    (800)392-0903
Fax: (309) 829-3294

Scalewatcher Industrial
104 Clearfield Lane, Suite 204
CoatesvUle, PA  19320
Tel: (215) 384-7200
Fax: (215) 383-9951

S&K Products International
80 Red Schoolhouse Rd. #102
Chestnut Ridge, NY  10977
Tel: (914) 425-6200
Fax: (914) 425-7602

Smart Sonic Precision Cleaning Systems
2372 Teller Rd., #107
Newbury Park, CA 91320
Tel: (805) 499-7440
Fax: (805) 375-5781

Solidstrip Inc.
601 Interchange Blvd.
Newark, DE 19711
Tel: (302) 292-8340
    (800) 677-4568
Fax: (302) 292-8321

Sonitech Inc.
239 East Stephenson St.
Freeport, IL 61032
Tel: (815) 235-2400
Fax: (815) 232-2150
Tally Cleaning Systems
Division of Letfab Engineering
332 John Diestch Blvd.
Attleboro Falls, MA 02763
Tel: (508) 695-1007
Fax: (508)695-6335
Aqueous cleaning chemicals  and equipment.   New
equipment using only steam to clean also available.
Electronic descaling systems for hard water treatment.
Jsopropyl  alcohol cleaning,  degreasing, vapor drying
systems.
Automated ultrasonic  and spray  batch  cleaners  for
precision cleaning of metal, plastic, and ceramic parts.
Systems clean oils, paniculate and other contaminates.
Optional waste evaporator.
Acrylic plastic blasting media for paint stripping.
Ultrasonic cleaning equipment using aqueous or semi-
aqueous chemistries for a wide range of applications.
Complete systems include cleaning tanks, rinse, tanks,
dryers and closed loop riiase water recirculation systems.
System uses alcohol or other solvents with perfluorinated
chemistry for rinsing and drying  non-water contact
applications.

Single and  multiple  stage  flat  belt  spraywashers,
monorail spraywashers and rotary drum  spraywashers
which  utilize aqueous-based  cleaning  formulations.
Complete custom  systems  available  which include
spi-aywash, sprayirinse, rustifthibit, hot air dry, particle
filtration, oU  separation,, etc.

-------
 Tbierica
 900 Clancy Ave.
 Grand Rapids, MI 49503
 Tel: (616)458-1538
 Fax: (616)458-7120

 Tiyoda MFG. U.S.A., Inc.
 1613 Lockness Place
 Torrance, CA 90501
 Td: (310) 539-5471
 Fax: (310) 539-5881

 Ultrasonic Power Systems Ltd.
 Unit Cl
 Hortonwood 10
 Telford, Shropshire
 ENGLAND TF1 4ES
 Tel: 0952 676646
 Fax: 0952 676599

 Ultronix Inc.
 104 Niantic Rd.
 Barto, PA 19504
 Td: (800) 553-7881
 Fax: (2150 845-3995

 Unitech Industrial Inc.
 PO Box 330
 16 South Ave,
 Wappingers Falls, NY  12590
Td: (914) 291-0745
    (800) 277-5522
Fax: (914) 297-2919

Zip-Chem Products
 1860 Dobbin Dr.
San Jose, CA 95133
Tel: (408) 729-0291
    (800) 648-2661
Fax: (408) 272-8062
New  low cost spray equipment- manages extremdy
difficult cleaning jobs. Used with large and small parts
containing baked grease and paint soils. Designed to be
safe and environmentally secure with hydrocarbon and
aqueous cleaning agents.  Stainless steel construction.

Closed-loop and self-contained ultrasonic batch cleaning
system. Ultrasonic immersion  (spray is optional) and
vapor cleaning combined with vacuum drying provide
complete cleaning and drying of virtually any component
or part. Near zero emissions.

Alcohol cleaning  using perfluorocarbons  as  a  vapor
blanket to inhibit flammabulty.
Retrofit existing equipment for  HCFCs, chlorinated
solvents, perfluorinated chemicals,  and hydrocarbon-
based solvents.  New equipment (manual or automated)
for efficient use of non-aqueous vapor phase chemicals.
Closed loop industrial cleaning systems.  Spray washers,
batch  cleaning  systems,  vapor  degreasing,   and
pretreatment systems available in new  equipment and
retrofits. Waste water treatment and recycling, 100% oil
removal from the cleaning process.
Aqueous, semi-aqueous aliphatic hydrocarbon, terpene
and  alcohol-based  cleaners.    Application  oriented
packaging like wipes, aerosols, specialty containers, and
other delivery systems available.

-------
 POLLUTION
 EQUIPMENT
CONTROL
 American Metal Wash, Inc.
 PO Box 265
 360 Euclid Ave.
 Canonsburg, PA  15317
 Tel: (412) 7464203
 Fax: (412) 746-5738

 Baron-Blakeslee, Inc.
 1500 West 16th St.
 Long Beach, CA 90813
 Tel: (800) 548-4422
 Fax: 010) 491-1091

 CF TEGHnologies, Inc.
 1 Westinghouse Plaza, Suite 200
 Hyde Park, MA 02136-2059
 Tel: (617) 364-2500
 Fax: (617) 364-2550

 Cincinnati Industrial Machinery
 PO Box 62027
 3280 Hageman  St.
 Cincinnati, OH  45241  (street add.)
                 45262 (PO Box)
 Tel: (513) 769-0700
 Fax: (513) 769-0697

 Container Products Corp.
 PO Box 3767
 Wilmington, NC  28406
 Tel: (919) 392-6100
 Fax: (919) 392-6778

 Creative Enterprizes
 3560 Springwood, Suite 811
 Ponca City, OK 74604
Tel: (405) 765-0879
Fax: (405) 765-0879

Ecolink                        •.
 1481 Rock  Mountain Blvd.
Stone Mountain, GA  30083
Tel: (404) 621-8240
        (800) 886-8240
Fax: (404) 621-8245
                     Line of evaporators, coalescers, and solution filtration
                     systems designed to assist in cleaning up the cleaning
                     solutions. Units can be provided as batch components to
                     be added to current systems or totally automated to be
                     incorporated  with  an  existing  system or  with  new
                     cleaning equipment.

                     Full  line  of  cleaning  equipment  for  use  with
                     aqueous,semi-aqueous, HCFC, and chlorinated solvents.
                     Closed  loop  system  incorporating  vacuum  drying
                     available (near zero emissions).
                     Supercritical  fluid  extraction cleaning  process  for
                     removing organic solvent, oil and lubricant residues.
                     May also be effective for puticulate removal when used
                     in conjunction with agitation and/or ultrasonics.
                     Custom  designed  machines  for  cleaning,  surface
                     preparation and  other processing of metal and  non-
                     imetallic parts.
                     Systems  incorporating a  variety of aqueous cleaning
                     techniques  which  include  filtered  negative pressure
                     chambers, high pressure chambers, and mobile cleaning
                     systems.
                     Specialize in low cost conversion of existing facilities to
                     safely use alternative cleaning agents.  Design new or
                     custom cleaning equipment and processes. Also design
                     environmentally secure drying equipment and processes.
                     Wide range of aqueous, semi-aqueous and non-aqueous
                     chemistries.    Formulations  include  a  variety  of
                     hydrocarbon, NMP, DUE and terpene products as well
                     as   non-ozone   depleting   halogenated   solvents.
                     Manufacture a complete line  of batch cleaning units for
                     use with these solvents.

-------
 Ecology Systems, Inc. "
 PO Box 391
 Bdiingham, MA  02019
 Tel: (508) 9664)396

 Environmental Recovery Resources, Inc.
 POBox36
 South Salem, NY  10590
 Tel: (914) 533-6175
 Fax:<914)533-6275
 ETUS, Inc.
 1511 Kastner Place
 Stnford,FL 32771
 Td;(407) 321-7910
 Fax: (407) 321-3098

 FMT Inc. (Findlay Machine & Tool)
 1950 Industrial Dr.
 Findlay, OH 4584O
 Tel: (419) 422-0768
    (800) 878-8011
 Fax: (419) 422-0072

 Hotsy Equipment Co.
 67 Sprague St.
 Boston, MA  02136
 Tel: (800) 544-7790

 Hoyt Corp.
 Forgs Rd.
 Westport, MA 02790-0217
 Tel: (508) 636-8811
 Fax: (508) 636-2088

 Hurricane Systems, Inc.,
 2080 Brooklyn Rd.
 PO Box 867
Jackson, MI 49204
Td: (517) 787-3481
 Fax: (517) 787-2349
Floating,  dispersed,   and  dissolved   hydrocarbon
contaminants removed to surface water discharge limits,
using: no coalescing plates, no centrifugal, no carbon
absorption, no sorbent waste.  Also offer systems and
services to extend  cleaning bath 'life* for more cost
effective aqueous systems and waste water processing,
and  waste-minimized  settling-pond  and  separator
maintenance/remediation.

Formulations  made of hydrocarbons and blends of
hydrocarbons and emulsifiers. Also offer aqueous-based
formulations containing detergents with  and without
glycol ethers.
Custom engineered parts cleaning equipment, standard
parts   cleaning  equipment,  and  pollution  control
equipment.
Wide range of "off-the-shelf, semi-custom, and custom
parts  cleaning  systems  using  water-based  cleaning
compounds. Systems include: belt, rotary and overhead
conveyors for continuous and batch processing; carousel,
cabinet, and agitation tank washers; multi-stage wash,
rinse, oxidation inhibit, and dry; oil removal and oil
slumming  devices;  electric,  gas,  and steam  heat
packages.

-------
 Infinitex
 PO Box 383
 10100 Main St.
 Clarence, NY  14031
 Td: (716) 759-6983
 Fax: (716) 759-2050

 Lewis Corp.
 102 Wtlienbrock Rd.
 Oxford, CT 06478-1033
 Td: (203) 264-3100
 Fax: (203) 264-3102

. Membrex, Inc.
 155 Route 46 West
 Fairfidd, NJ 07004
 Tel: (201) 575-8388
 Fax:(201)575-7011

 Met-Pro Corp.
 Systems Division
 160 Cassell Rd.
 Harleysville, PA 19438
Tel: (215) 723-6751
Fax: (215) 723-6161

 Midbrook Industries
 1745 West Hamlin Rd.
Rochester Hills, MI 48309
Td: (313) 852-2490
    (800) 966-9274
Fax: (313) 852-5520
Uld afiltration systems loir oil and water separation.
NAPCO
Plymouth Industrial Park
Terryville, CT 06786
Tel: (203) 589-7800
Fax: (203) 589-7304

Proceco
7300 Tdlier St.
Montreal, Quebec
Canada BIN 3T7
Tel: (514) 254-8494
Fax: (514) 254-8184
    (514) 254-6922
Manufacturer of industrial cleaning systems, specializing
la aqueous-based chemistries.  Both ultrasonic and non-
ultrasonic washers available.
Membrane based separation processes to recycle, wash,
and  rinse  waters  from  aqueous-based and organic
cleaning solutions.
Activated  carbon fiber iidsorption systems for control
and  recovery  of  cleaning  solvent  ah* emissions.
Recovers solvent in higher quality and with less energy
use than granular carbon.  Systems can be regenerated
with steam, air or nitrogen.
Chemical flocculation waste water treatment systems for
heavy metal emulsified oil, suspended solid removal to
render industrial  waste  water suitable for sewering.
Ulirafiltration  waste, water  treatment  systems  for
pretreatment of oily waste water for either reuse or
disposal.   Metal  working fluid filtration systems to
extend working life of fluids.  Oil separation systems
including skimmers and coalescers to separate tramp oils
from metal working fluids.
Aqueous spray washers  (turntable, belt conveyor, and
immersion types).  Also supply contaminated cleaning
solutions recycling systems.

-------
Prosys Corp.
lg? BOiarica Rd.
Chelmsfbrd, MA  01824
Td: (508) 2504940
Fix: (508) 2504977

Quantum Technologies '
POBox223
Jones MO! Industrial Park
Jones Mill, AR 72105
Tel: (501) 844-4700
Fax: (501) 8444711

R.G. Hanson Co., Inc.
703 £. Lincoln
Bloomington, IL 61701
Tel: (309) 828-5070
    (800) 3924903
Fax: (309) 829-3294

SAMSCO, Inc.
18 Cote Ave.
Goffstown,NH 03045
Tel: (603) 668-7111

Separation Technologists, Inc.
100 Griffin Brook Park
Methuen, MA 01844
Tel: (508) 794-1170
Fax: (508) 794-0933

S&K Products International
80 Red Schoplhouse Rd. #102
Chestnut Ridge, NY  10977
Td: (914) 425-6200  .
Fax: (914) 425-7602

Smart Sonic Precision Cleaning Systems
2373 Teller Rd., #107
Newbury Park, CA 91320
Td: (805) 499-7440
Fax: (805) 375-5781
                              %
Sonitech Inc.
239 East Stephenson St.
Freeport, IL 61032
Td: (815) 235-2400
Fax: (815) 232-2150
Aqueous  cleaning chemicals and  equipment.   New
equipment using only steam to clean also available.
Scrubber systems for near zero VOC emissions, when
using isopropyl alcohol cleaning and drying systems.
Automated  ultrasonic  and spray batch  cleaners for
precision cleaning of metal, plastic, and ceramic parts.
Systems clean oils, paniculate and other contaminates.
Optional waste evaporator.
Ultrasonic cleaning equipment using aqueous or semi-
aqueous chemistries for a wide range of applications.
Complete systems include cleaning tanks, rinse, tanks,
dryers and closed loop rinse water recirculation systems.
System uses alcohol or other solvents with perfluorinated
chemistry  for rinsing and  drying  non-water  contact
applications.

-------
 Ultronix Inc.
 104 Niantic Rd.
 Barto, PA 19504
 Tel: (800) 553-7881
 Fax: (2150 845-3995

 Unitech Industrial Inc.
 PO Box 330
 16 South Ave,
 Wappingers Falls, NY  12590
 Tel: (914) 297-0745
    (800)277-5522
 Fax: (914) 297-2919

 Westek
 400 Rolyn Place
 Arcadia, CA 91007
 Tel: (818) 446-4444
 Fax: (818) 446-7341

 Zenon Environmental Inc.
 845 Harrington Court
 Burlington, Ontario
 Canada L7N 3P3
 Tel: (416) 639-6320
 Fax: (416) 639-1812
Retrofit, existing  equipment  for -HCFCs chlorinated,
solvents, perfluorinated chemicals,  and -hydrocarbon-
based! solvents.  New equipment (manual or automated)
for efficient use of non-aqueous vapor phase chemicals.
Closed loop industrial cleaning systems.  Spray washers,
batch  cleaning  systems,  vapor  decreasing,   and
pretreatment systems available in new  equipment and
retrofits. Waste water treatment and recycling, 100% oil
removal from the cleaning process.
RETROFIT ALTERNATIVES

Allied-Signal
POBoxll39R
Morristown, NJ  07960
Tel: (201) 455-4848
Fax: (201) 455-2745

Altos Engineering, Inc.,
6009 N. 61 Ave
Glendale, AZ  85301
Tel: (602) 931-8434
Fax: (602) 937-6396

Baron-Blakeslee, Inc.
1500 West 16th St.
Long Beach, CA  90813
Tel: (800) 548-4422
Fax: (310) 49H091
Batch and inline cleaning equipment with non-chemical,
thermal  vacuum drying of rinse waters.   Detergent
formulations available with and without glycol ethers.
Ful! line of cleaning equipment for use with aqueous,
semi-aqueous, HCFC, and chlorinated solvents.  Closed
loop system incorporating vacuum drying available (near
zero emissions).

-------
 Blue Wave Ultrasonics "
 Div. of Alpheus Cleaning
  Technologies Corp.
 960S. RolffSt.
 Davenport, IA 52802
 td: (319) 322-0144   .
    (800) 373-0144
 Fax: (319)322-7180

 Branson Ultrasonics Inc.  *
 41 Eagle Rd.
 Danbury, CT 06810
 Tel: (203) 796-0400
 Fax:(203)79641381

 Creative Enterprizes
 3560 Springwood, Suite 811
 Ponca City, OK 74604
 Td: (405) 765-0879
 Fax: (405) 765-0879

 Environmental Recovery Resources, Inc.
 PQBox36
 South Salem, NY  10590
 Tel: (914) 533-6175
 Fax: (914) 533-6275
Environmental Solvents Corp.
1840 Southside Bl jd.
Jacksonville, FL 32216
Td: (904) 724-1990
Fax: (904) 724-2508

Envirosolutions Inc.
335 Post Road West
Westport, CT 06880
Td: (203) 454-5902
Fax: (203) 222-0190
ETUS, Inc.
1511 Kastner Place
Sanford, FL  32771
Tel:(407) 321-7910
Fax: (407) 321-3098
Ultrasonic   cleaning  equipment*  built  for  various
applications specific to the customer's needs. Effective
in cleaning different products and materials throughout
the scope of fabricated metals, plastics, and ceramics.
Also   offer  aqueous-based  detergents  that  are
environmentally safe.
Ultrasonic cleaning equipment and integrated cleaning
systems for metal, electronic, and precision cleaning
requirements.   Manual  and fully automated material
handling/transport  systems.  Equipment for aqueous,
semi-aqueous and solvent chemistry.

Specialize in low cost conversion of existing facilities to
safely use alternative cleaning  agents.  Design new or
custom cleaning equipment and processes.  Also design
environmentally secure drying equipment and processes.


Floating,   dispersed,   and   dissolved  hydrocarbon
contaminants removed to surface water discharge limits,
using: no coalescing plates,  no centrifugal, no  carbon
absorption, no sorbent waste.  Also offer systems and
services to extend cleaning  bath  'life* for more cost
effective aqueous systems and  waste water processing,
and  waste-minimized  settling-pond   and  separator
maintenance/remediation.

Inexpensive retrofit kit  for  existing  small two sump
degreasers.   Designed   for use with terpene-based
solvents  in  water-free  cleaning.   Small production
capacity.
Biodegradable, non-caustic, neutral pH cleaner which is
used in a closed loop parts washing system.  Several
different formulations developed  to  suit a variety of
cleaning needs. Customized parts washing equipment is
matched to the cleaning chemicals to ensure optimum
performance.

Formulations made  of hydrocarbons  and  blends of
hydrocarbons and emulsifiers. Also offer aqueous-based
formulations  containing detergents with and without
glycol ethers..

-------
 Finishing Equipment Inc.
 3640 Kennebec Dr.
 St. Paul, MN 55122
 Tel: (612) 452-1860
 Fax:(612)452-9851
 FMT Inc. (Findlay Machine & Tool)
 1950 Industrial Dr.
 Findlay, OH 4584O
 Tel: (419) 422-0768
    (800) 878-8011
 Fax: (419) 422-0072

 Occidental Chemical Corp.
 Technical Center
 PO Box 344
 Niagara Falls, NY  14302
 Tel: (800) 733-1165
 Fax: (716) 278-7297

 Petroferm Inc.
 5415 First Coast Highway
 Fernandina Beach, FL 32034
 Tel: (904) 261-8286
 Fax: (904) 261-6994
SONICOR Instrument Corp.
100 Wartburg Ave.
Copiague, NY 11726
Tel: (516) 842-3344
Fax: (516) 842-3389

Ultronix Inc.
104 Niantic Rd.
Barto, PA  19504
Tel: (800) 553-7881
Fax: (2150 845-3995

Unitech Industrial Inc.
PO Box 330
16 South Ave,
Wappingers Falls, NY  12590
Tel: (914) 297-0745
    (800) 277-5522
Fax: (914) 297-2919
Aqueous, semi-aqueous and solvent cleaning systems
available.  From manual systems to automated high-
production cleaning lines, with ultrasonics available as
needed.    Specialize in  automated enclosed  vapor
degreasers for efficient use of the non-ozone depleting
chlorinated solvents.

Custom engineered  parts cleaning equipment, standard
parts   cleaning  equipment,  and   pollution   control
equipment.
Specially stabilized methylene chloride for a wide variety
of applications.  Formulations of halogenated toluenes
and benzotrifluorides for cold cleaning of metals and
electronics.  Ethylene based  glycol ethers for .use in
many cleaning formulations.
Broad line of formulations based on terpenes, ester, and
aliphatic hydrocarbons  and  blends  of these organic
solvents with surfactants.  Products  are used for cold
(hand) cleaning and in combination with various cleaning
equipment.  Products cain be removed by evaporation,
water,  alcohols or nonflammable fluorinated solvents.
Both products and rinse media can be recycled. ,

Ultrasonic  cleaning  equipment,  automated aqueous
cleaning systems. Environmentally safe alternatives to
cleaning with hazardous  solvents.
Retrofit existing  equipment  for  HCFCs  chlorinated
solvents,, perfluorinated chemicals,  and hydrocarbon-
based solvents.  New equipment (manual or automated)
for efficient use of non-aqueous vapor phase chemicals.
Closed loop industrial churning systems. 'Spray washers,
batch  cleaning   systems,   vapor  degreasing,  and
pretreatment systems available in new  equipment and
retrofits. Waste water tnjatment and recycling, 100% oil
removal from the cleaning process.

-------
 NO CLEAN ALTERNATIVES
 Grele-Proseo, Inc.
 2017 Yost Ave.
 Bloomington, IN 47403
 Tel: (812) 339-3653  .
 Fax: (812) 331-2566
Aqueous, alkaline, etchant cleaners for ferrous and non-
ferrous  applications.  Aqueous, acidic, neutral* and
alkaline oil rejecting cleaners with or without glycol
ethers far ferrous and non-ferrous applications.  Water
miscible, semi-aqueous cleaners (electronics cleaning).
Water  einulsifiable  cleaners containing aliphatic and
terpene  solvents.    Evaporative  oils for  no  clean
applications.
 MAINTENANCE CLEANING

 Calgon Corp.
 Chemical Technologies Group
 PO Box 1346
 Pittsburgh, PA 15230
 Tel: (800) 955-0090
 Fax: (412) 777-8927

 Chemtronics, Inc.
 8125 Cobb Center Dr.
 Kenncsaw, GA 30144
 Tel: (404) 4244888
 Fax: (404) 424-4267

 EXXON Chemical Co.
 PO Box 3272
 Houston, TX  77253-3272
 Tel: (800) 526-0749
 »rax; (713)870-6661
JnJ Industries
195 E. Main St., Suite 303
Mllford, MA 01757
Tel: (800)554-9994
Fax: (508) 478-2221

Kleer-Flo Company
15I5I Technology Dr.
Eden Prairie, MN  55344
Tel: (612) 934-2555
    (800) 328-7942
Fax: (612) 934-3909
Formulations include  non-chelating,  non-phosphate,
readily  biodegradable  aqueous-based  cleaners,  non-
chlorinated  solvent  cleaners  and  paint  removing
compounds, non-glycol based solvent enhanced general
cleaners, neutral pH process  cleaners,  and industrial
waste treatment polymers.

Ultra-pure cleaners for electronics and metals.
Cleaners comprised of narrow boiling range, high flash
point aliphatic hydrocarbons. Low olefin and  aromatic
content.  Low residue,  low corrosivity to metals, low
odor,  low toxicity.    Requires  no  water handling.
Recycle by distillation.  Effective against a wide range
if waxes, oils, and greases.

Manufacturer of eight non-CFC formulations including
a supersaturated wipe solvent.

-------
 LPS Laboratories, Inc.
 4647 Hugh Howell Rd.
 Tucker, GA  30084
 Tel: (800) 241-8334
 Fax:(404)493-9206

 Micro Cast Corp.
 34 Ronzo Rd.
 Bristol, CT 06010
 Tel: (203) 585-7912
 Fax:  (203) 585-7378
 MUler-Stephenson Chemical Co., Inc.
 George Washington Highway
 Danbury, CT 06810
 Tel: (203) 743-4447
 Fax: (203) 791-8702

 Petrofenn Inc.
 5415 First Coast Highway
 Fernandina Beach, FL 32034
 Tel: (904) 261-8286
 Fax: (904) 261-6994
Rite Off
1545 5th Industrial Ct.
Bay Shore, NY  11706
Tel: (516) 665-6868
    (800) 645-5853
Fax: (516) 968-4218

Rochester Midland Corp.
333 Holienbeck St.
Rochester, NY 14621
Tel: (716) 336-2200
Fax: (716) 467-4406
Terpene Technologies Inc.
3400 Ridge Rd. W, Suite 293
Rochester, NY 14626
Tel: (716) 546-8455
    (716) 777-0790
Fax: (716) 227-3834
Solvent cleaners based on but not limited to terpene
hydrocarbon,   alcohol,  or   HCFC   technologies.
Formulations are engineered for use in non-automated
hand cleaning applications where rinsing is not available.
Cleaners are effective in touch-up cleaning and precision
cleaning of all types of flux residues, oils, grease and
grime.
Broad line of formulations based on terpenes, ester, and
aliphatic hydrocarbons and  blends  of these organic
solvents with surfactants.  Products  are used for cold
(hand) cleaning and in combination with various cleaning
equipment.  Products can be removed by evaporation,
water, alcohols or nonflammable fluorinated solvents.
Both products and rinse media can be recycled.
Formulations comprised of hydrocarbon and/or terpene
solvents. Some also contain surfactants.  Many contain
alkaline builders and chelants as well as glycol ethers.
Some aqueous-based or water-compatible formulations
exhibit good biodegradability. Many products allow for
good oil/grease separation upon standing.
      /                        ,*
Terpene alcohol  and hydrocarbon blends used as non-
water  soluble solvents,  semi-aqueous  cleaners  and
degreasers based on terpene alcohols and hydrocarbons.
Also offer aqueous-based terpene formulations containing
detergents and emulsifisrs.

-------
Texo Corporation
2801 Highland Ave.
Ciccimuti, OH 45212
Tel: (513) 731-3400
Fax:(513)731-8113
Union Camp Corp.
Bush Boake Allen Division
PO Box 37617
Jacksonville, FL  32236
Tel: (904) 783-2180
    (800)874-9220
Fax: (904) 786-6495

W.R. Grace & Co.
Metalworking Fluids Group
55 Hayden Ave.
Lexington, MA 02173
Tel: (617) 861-6600
Fax: (617) 861-9066

Zip-Chem Products
I860 Dobbin Dr.
San Jose, CA 95133
Tel: (408) 729-0291
    (800) 648-2661
Fax: (408) 272-8062
Aqueous, semi-aqueous, and various solvent cleaners for
replacement of vapor decreasing and handwiping with
solvents.    Applications  of  cleaners  can  be spray
immersion, ultrasonic or handwiping.  Cleaners can be
multimetal  safe. and  contain  corrosion  inhibitors  if
necessary.
                                               %
Range of wood terpene-based alternative solvents  for
semi-aqueous and solvent only cleaning processes and
maintenance cleaning applications.  High solvency and
high soil loading properties for removal of solder fluxes,
heavy   oils  and   greases,  polishing  compounds,
carbonaceous deposits  etc.  to the highest cleanliness
standards.

Wide range of aqueous cleaning formulations for metal.
precision,  and  maintenance  cleaning.     Includes
formulations  that are  phosphate-free.   Suitable for
agitation, soak, spray, ultrasonic and hand wipe
applications.
Aqueous, semi-aqueous aliphatic hydrocarbon, terpene
and  alcohol-based  cleaners.    Application oriented
packaging like wipes, aerosols, specialty containers, and
other delivery systems available.

-------