,,*D*_^P, :-_.:.- -^ —-<•££&$$£$
VssffiiSfjjP 'iSivK-jsp"*] ^rTii-'-Tnsi.,* j,,1 ,•!£'
^l^l^^^^i^te^iiH^^
-------
OO
§a
s.s
BW S
CUrt g
s a.
e
minimize paperwork and red
S>
^
£T»
{3
o
C
ft
1
Minimal Bureaucracy: We onl
^<
S
n>
1.
n"
Crt
|
are profitable and that sustain
o
i-i
i'
>5
^
§
>J3
e
£L
4?
Profitable Upgrades: We onl
~<;
P
01
"O
B
fl>
en
Q
try to dictate solutions.
0
i
n>
D.
tr
i
o
r>
o
3
1
B"
2.
i.
01
Strong Technical Support: We
5;
§i
"d
^
o
t
n>
01
|
crq
g
52.
prevent pollution by increasin
CTQ
B-
a
"O
3
&
O
*— h
§:
-^
s,
«
Voluntary Participation: We se
n
*?
Ti
>™J
B
n>
ol
^
o
I
^-*-
ci
r principles guide our efforts:
!
— '
A
p
"^
S3
p.
i-i
1
0
a
"o
M
O
a
ft
P-
(Ti
01
O
i-i
?
cn
B-
n>
a
sT
s
I
•-<
P
&
o
0
0
1
°s
o
49
en
tf
ft
n. P
n gu
Ti 0'
O crq
B a
tf o
&T
g
-------
-^ w
-------
a t) &3
it^
§1^
§ ^ s
8-82
1" s' »
III
^ Ss ^
ir
Cft t*1
l^1
II
S %
rf ^
JL £.
-< ^
H-- 3
w S
"d 3
rt ,r*
I
B
p.
o
^ b
| f
o ^
£35 f5
O fl3
fB £+
OQ
air conditio
5. S
2. K
,L fcr: o
n
O
H 1
tr S
n
1
H
n
n>
p-
C/3
I
O)
$ 3
r? &
s- q
K- ?•
Cf.
o
en
n>
cr
arriers.
3
§•
(T)
operation
S
m
n
o
3
n
3*
S
o
n
bu
3
era
n
3
n>
i-j
23
en
(T>
5'
ff.
W B-
o
era
p
3
en
en
fl>
n
to
O
o
"d
(T)
O
fD
3
n
B
O
3
m
§
en
en
n>
3
o
n>
3
ri-
s,
n> p±
o
3
C?
3
3^
3
5'
era
n>
I
CD
n>
en
s, s.
-------
, as well as other promising
-efficient lighting.
£ ™
2 0
Q. CD
» 11
! fi.
! Q) O
1 ® CO
| o 2
£ e
li"
.£••§
IE
IS
28
Lights Today: 1993
on ft2 Committed
Is
(3 co
1
ted From These Commitrru
/Vh/yr Energy Savings
X ^
111 00
CD
T5
IT of Carbon Emissions Avoi
^.
T3
CD
"D
I
*CO
Metric Tons of SO2 Emissioi
o
O)
LO
/1\
w
T3
I
co
.0
CO
CO
LLI
ox
B
CO
.0
i
E
00
T—
.
Iillion Reductions in Electricit
^
0
o
CD
SO2 allowance credits, worth an
tions.
5 =
T3 73
CO CD
0 >-
si
EJ
jit of the Clean Air Act, these reductions
$300-$1,000/ton, rather than actual err
* As a resi
estimated
n
o"
CO
.^
1
CM
C
CO
C
o
'co
snts/kWh.
PA. Calculated using the following emis
; NOX= 2.5 g/kWh.
ICO
U
CU
fi
a,
CO
.s
bo
O
•S
c
o
•a
a
support system software,
S ^1 I «
N 81. 1 .2
y ^ o> • ffi
< o co • '0
* co in J cu
^ ^ _ ^ n3
recognition for their contri-
o
3
nformation, a lighting up-
roduct i
a,
a
o
•d
^
a,
bo
•3
S
c
|
bo
fl
tfl
i— i
CU
T)
S
bD
.III
I
faO
u 43 -IS
-o
fl
4J
CJ
Si
CU
O «
earn internal rates of return of 20
a
o
•43
•i-H
S
J— 1
•J— >
Pi
CU
CU
a,
CO-
CO
3
lighting upgrades significantly
improve lighting quality. Better
S
I— <
o
CJ
CO
CU
CJ
Pi
cu
bo
-4—*
_bp
13
cr1
rendition and eliminates flicker-
_PI
•M
CO
CU
bo
°u
CU
bo
increasing worker productivity.
In Green Lights, organizations
sign an agreement to upgrade 90
percent of their space within 5
years wherever it is profitable and
wherever lighting quality is main-
tained or enhanced. EPA assists
Green Lights participants with
their decision making. GPO and
implementation processes by pro-
co
cS
CJ
g
0
a,
CO
13
2
bo
C
S
X a
a&
s s
o a,
CJ 'O
O
o
CJ
cu
o
cu
CU
^s
cu
a & o^
lS8.^g|
lfla.hl.
e
S
o
.S
§•
c g
sy «.
•US!
"fa T3 Ji
I
-------
*B
£
i
o
l-b
ft
8
g4
>->•
M
&
w
13
1
ft
en
1
13
i-!
o'
3
o
l-t
ft
£
§
m
0
13
ft
>-!
O
ft
r-t-
S1
i-!
O
O
mmercial buildings
^
W
g_
1— '
P-
M*
oq
en
n
£>
3
3
P*
s
o
ft
ft
ft
^J
23
y.
i— '
rf
n]
"E
3'
crq
h-"
3
3
ft
cn
£
ft
,-Q
pj
i-«.
13
tnent. Organization
en
P
"•p
01
3
cn
O>
1
Crq
3
o
O
0
tf.
3
Crq
S
3
o
«*
; of air-distribution
§
CO
p-
1
1
&
ft
13
CD
&
7*
&"
Crq
8
reduce other buildi
3
Crq
13
3
crq
M
ro
im expands beyond
crq'
3*
T*
^
ft
W
ft
1-1
S.
&
crq
cn
pant comfort.
maintaining or improving occu-
reducing building energy while
cessful approach of profitably
and will help document the suc-
models for program participants
Showcase buildings will serve as
ft
3
ft
H-"
Crq
crq
I
n
en
H
3^
ft
efficiency and profitability of
country that demonstrate the
case 20 buildings across the
Star Buildings program will show-
o
o'
3
cn
i— <
I— '
to
to
ft
3
ft
of different energy upgrade
ings and evaluate the suitability
|
en
>-!
ft
1
ft
a-
B
1
cr
>_i.
II5 1
3 5s ?£
—..» "n
R- ^a
.
CD
CO
I
3
Q.
0)
I
§
Q.
5"
CO
s-
rn
-a
I
•31
SB
0.
T3
SB
.
II.
ro 3
3 CD
X 3D
O CD
3 52-
o Q.
-------
t.fj
'-— w S o
- o o ~o
.-.-g£fi
i: .•, ss'-g
r Q. o §
= +^ CD
f C Q. CD
r- CD X J^
r -J3 o *-
^
S
S
13 O
ir •^-•^7>r — TTT- ": ^^Trnpr
! The Exploding I
Energy Ef f icien
0> CO
.CD
ess. Sales foi
Dgrams alone
e— comparab
c c ~a
M °LCO
i
Energy efficiency is BIG bu
ed by these four innovative
CJ
CD
-a £.
JB-5
+= 3
•Si
1»
05 -i
CD 3
£ "0
^s
-° 9-
o|
.= CO
.a a.
(0
O
_i
_l
S
1
O
SALES OF EFFICIENT PR
•a
!
^- o
O CO ^J"
*• CO"
w * *
00
19
f Lighting1
• Personal Computers
-a
CD
CD CO
Q. CD
co.>
CDQ
-Q !_
.« o
1 i
o
0
m
1 —
T —
O
in
*
, For Ventilation
o
O
CM
m"
o
0
CM
*
*
!.
1 Refrigerators2
ctronic ballasts.
o
CD
CO
co"
Q.
.2
£
1* Negligible.
i 1 1ncludes only compact fluoresce
•5
05
_CU
0)
1
0
V
CD
be those that us
£
' 2 Efficient refrigerators are definec
the 1993 DOE standard.
earch Institute,
ju of the Census data.
m CD •
rr ^ •
Electric Power
acturers, and Bi
E^
PS
Sources: EPA estimates derived f
[International Data Corporation, me
Hi
w 5 fl n ° v
i lill^p
"B.«
a 1 ^-d
w* -(-J gj
o *S cu "2
1 Ji.1
fl
-------
01
Q.
CD
X
•a
Q>
3
a.
31'
to'
en'
r*
*As technologies evolve
o>
o
3
5"
£
o
3
Q.
5'
3
en
o
3"
• Clothes Dryers
• Ducts
• Windows and Ins
c_
5'
1
•n
i
CO
o
1
-^
I
CD
Q>
Q.
CO
• Air Conditioners
• Advanced Water
X
CD
1
3
m Advanced Electri
o
Q)
a
Q
&>
CO
X
CD
s*
^^
^0
c
3
.
5: 0. ?¥ CO
*< Q. CD" o
3 § -w o
O
0 ffi
CT1 O
i B
2 8
(D
CD
renters
m o 3 o'
m ^ 3 m"
-3 2 CQ m
® -• 3 -03
3
I
en
n
CD
[O
3 8
ll
S3
tf. a
1-* *"rt
O i-S
CD q
O IB
n
CO, CD
S' a
e. c
a- o
n> S
a>
o
o
CO
w
JsO
O
'-d
CD
CD
>, d
cient options.
ff
3
CO
en'
1
Cfl
C/5
1
purchasing more efficient sys-
3
en
CO
O
|
O
i,
building owners on favorable
able to homeowners and
tions to increase money avail-
• Working with financial institu-
energy efficient.
activity in making homes more
trades to expedite increased
skilled infrastructure of local
• Supporting expansion of a
CO
1
CO
d
CD
O
1
y
through market mechanisms
• Inducing superior technologies
&
i-i
en
i
M
Co"
O
CfQ
CD
• CD
. CD
TJ
1
•-S
rable investment opportunities.
homes than available from compa-
er return on "investment" in their
profit, earning a significantiy high-
-------
of
CO
t«
4i
CJ
S-i
J§
faO
CJ
•s
o
^
EPA has efforts under
TJ
rH
utilities ai
the unwillingness of
g
I
CJ
S
&
•o
"S
CJ
lj
CJ
•s
1
2
CO
CJ
£
CJ
.&
a,
I
CJ
d
• r-(
a
methane recovery at coal i
c/r
3e facilitie:
gas produced by the;
ft
o
"— j
environmental protection.
>%
s-i
2
cS
1
£
and the existence of
£
creation, and increased re
CJ
3
CJ
?
§
frameworks that disc
13
o
u
enues — are recognized by
8
bo
use of the recovered
1?
mrne operators, as well as
CJ
&
IT*
These barriers a
co
CJ
'C
CJ
bO
States and other Federal a
i
^
rco
'bb
fli
addressed through li
i
&b
g
OH
£
w
^
•J— )
"8
CO
3
«2
JT
CJ
s
•r Federal
<_>
2
3
en
•fl
•M
(S
CO
d
o
vd
£
,£$
o
1
is the Appalachian region,
jj
3
0
TJ
as
I
level; incentive prog]
i
s-i §
eg i
3
d
p
o
*d
o
CJ
1— 1
CJ
CJ
#
S-i
encou
fi
•o
to
OH
V
f
J3
.d
invest
•i
!
CJ
U
d
Ti
CJ
5
•5
2
CJ
a
in
c2
.3
^
1
o
J
w
CO
-------
r-t-^ £3
cn
P
P
3
O
3
§
P-
o4
3
0)
r-*-
3"
B
(D
I
n>
g.
"d
i-i
o
oq
>-!
F
cn
rt
rt
V?
f—t-
c?
h-i>
3
O
w
rt
1
P.
o
3
n
O
3
*d
H-I*
rt
y
P-
5'
1— i
to
to
n
^
CfQ
L^
P
1
cn
».
o
3
§
P*
Pi
&r
I
SJ!
O4
rt
rt
3
cn
f
O
P.
&
I\0
2
S
pi •
3'
oq
3
1
!-d
^
g
g-
^5'
eg
rt
rt
3
rt
3
sr
ty
1
K-1
1
S
«
cn
•§
I'
5"
OP
o
Hi
rt
I'
1.
&
3
i
»__!
o
rt
|H
r~"
22.
O
3
f?
o
B*
o
I— "•
o
equipment
B-
S
3
O
i-s
&3
>— t
~-
er
OD
3
of
rt O
O O
^ 3
3 *O
a. Curre
esti
B 3
expo
eir
P cn
<"*• C"
8 g
e
sug
egie
w
0
rt
c?
P4
-S"
3q
H.
t^1
Cn
in technoL
u
2§
cient use o
f energy and advance
Cn
corporatio
3
cn
B-
!
3
o
rt
1
for ratepay
rers, consumers, and
efforts will
translate to benefits
vent emissi
.ons of methane. The
cn
rt
technologi
rt
cn
P.
T3
g
P.
O
rt
cn
s
^
?
q
•-
-------
SJ
CJ
co
CJ
(J
.a a
•c
PH
CJ
•fl
'S
emitted as by-products
S3
3
CJ
mary aluminum produ
S3
O
"cj
a
S
-d
CO
CO
O
2
OH
Cj_j
0
CO
S3
_O
.59
greenhouse gases. Emi
>-N
rQ
TJ
CJ
CJ
^
B
CM
U
1
CJ
a
bo
2
•3
S3
§
OH
S
OO
CO
d
1
i-H
ment and technologica
fr
by the aluminum indus
CJ
,0
CO
_CJ
Aluminum compan:
*->
CJ
1
2
1
2
I
O
U
CJ
,
i
/-*N
reduction by the year 2(
CO
«r-I
a
CJ
.rt
'C
periodically measure th
-[-i
u
T3
S3
0
o
W
01
o
CO
S3
_O
s O (jo
ill!
• — •".
f-r.
0
VU
•id
CO
qj
S^
) where technica
CO
CM
U
re
CO
CJ
3
be
H
bo
2
ex
CJ
!-<
13
:utional, financi
CO
_fl
j"^
I
O
G<
CJ
H
CO
OJ
r— (
1
^3
u
'S
CJ
CJ
w
T3
S3
rt
CO
'a
d i
duce methane <
S-H
i— i
I— 1
^
1
bo
t— 1
3
andfills substan
a
o
(-M
sions
o
duce emissions
CJ
CO
I™— (
1
CO
CO
a
s
o
S3
CM
o
C/D
CN
0
o
CO
"cj
CO
"^3
CJ
'a,
ts S
H-I CV3
-------
I
tufacturers who
V.
°3
ffi
JsO
00
, a potent green:
13-
O
en
re
IT<
HH
Q
S
2 production is
rT
CA
ra
i-
p
n
re
1
1\0
3
re
i,
s
&
S'
f\1
illy feasible and
8
CA
re
t±>
ffi
p
JsD
2 production wt
re
re
H*'
1-i
re
&
n
rt>
WH
HH
^
£
OO
g
1
3
P-
o
r-(-
3'
era
'-d
g
p.
n
re
en
P.
F?
O
CT1
^ __
o"
OT
S'
en
O-
fT)
J
>— »
>§
and implement
*o
3
n
re
r/i
B
/-^
:turers of HCFC
JsO
ISO
F5
nj
i
*c
S
E?
re
i-s
en
I34
'-3'
1
|
&
w
^
en
S
'TJ
^
re
B3
H
Oi
OQ
s,
i °
s
S.
§
>-!
rt>
&
n
P.
O
en
"
0
p.
en
B
3
re
p
S
>3
re
&3
P
P-
rt>
P
'id
re
en
re
B
a*
a»
i-rT1
^
a
2
(T)
re
Tl
3
ID
0
o
o
C
a
3
P.
a4
ft)
I
re
Hi
to
to
o
p
B
a
P.
o
o
R
re
P
rt
i-!
re
&
o
g-
3
en
tt
&3
rt
13^
3
th
P
re
re
en
P.
3
Pi
a>
CA
s,
H)
CA*
£2-
o
m
S3 £2 3
<» X' 5
o &
to
to
to
rt)
en
3
o
re
n
en
3
o
°s
H.
^
-------
I
(ft
ation Package
General Inform
:nt language.
3
O
2
31
rgy Star Computers
le)
Purchasing Ene
letter of princip
tnent Purchasing
Federal Govern]
rs, and Allies
4j
d
£
O
1 —
ting Manufacturers
Listof Participa
S
1
1,
I
CO
of qualified Energy
Abbreviated list
2
X
3
o
S
ent: PC Monitor Mi
Sample Agreem
£
%
3
y
ent: Printer Manufz
a
4>
a
4P
4)
"Pn
inufacturers
S
4>
O
g<
a
ent: Software or Co:
Sample Agreem
4)
bo
£
O
Informat
»nane rrograms
Methane Programs General
&
J3
u
p^
formation
Natural Gas Star General Ini
-4_>
d
4)
4>
4)
*
^
O
4)
H
1
1
%
+j
CO
3
O
•g
1
4)
•a
bo
d
'd
'o
>— >
4)
^
J4
3
PH
AgStar General Information
4)
1
Pi
d
o
'3
C3
o
"fi
13
!i
4>
d
cS
1
£
Coalbed Methane Outreach
4)
£3
g
O
a
rrt
Livestock Productivity Progr;
4)
8P
*%
1
d
o
•d
rt
d
H- 1
"(3
TO
S-i
^
O
8^
P?
w
4J
S
GO
73
4)
.5
'3
4)
•S
issions in
Anthropogenic Methane Em
to Congress
_d
«j
J
*5o
CO
*d
1
*3
Opportunities to Reduce An
the United States: Report to
s
la
« '
lillrf
13
S.S
"g
^3 u « ^ S"
'rt PJ ^ S r-t
«f<3 S^-^
^ &-.S^
S •
.„ 41 o
aee
I
I
4)
8P
^
u
rt
PH
4)
'(J
ffl
w
o Enei
d Appro
t
CO
g
S
bo
O
£
w
bo
1
'3
PQ
S
•J-J
d
4)
a
4>
4)
&>
<3
o<
1
4)
^4
Cti
PH
JH
a
CO
g
c*3
1
1
73
'3
PQ
(D
I
bo s a v
a e .1 «a
«
-------
ro CD
oo —
00 T3
cb o
•fc-ca
O
IT
o
ro
iv) o
00--"
CD-
"-1 t~\ J
cb9&T
L CD Ej*
ro CD o
0 3 F5
£*
0 CO JD
"~ "
WCQ
cTfe-g1
S =* 5
if g>
§ 5-i
T3 £=
g 3
»a
&l
-------
.£
I
.1
m
u
.8
.2
1
I!
1
I
I
I
o
(A
i
-------
' will1!!"! II 'in111 ? 'i:! :n !"i' i. I V i'" ':l" .!• " " : • ! "I: •"V !"
^i,9l<|l?l '|"'j fty4 !'! ' ' ! •' ''' !'• 1ll'J"1 !""' '""'I'1 '" '""'i!'" '•"ISS
1 !" l^li^wiTiftM.'^'-ii^^Hral^^wi^n
iiiiii^^ Hi, ics.;!:;'!;:;!^^
{'"jlf™!!!'!!'1!!";1" •"I*-1"!'"! i ij '» i !'!!> '"! j"'1'1 ! I1' i ii'fi'.i*.li« kLli!,',:!-.):; *
I'lil'j;" JJ,,,,; "„ •"; ,, ' „,,,',!, ' i'l'M',"''„, I",,'I1,''" I, „ ' i'1'!' ' ",„,„
ll« '„ , iirlill'lllll || rallw'flilliS,1 III1,'1! I I I1
; 31 1HHMH
if:,-'1:; ,7:;
m n
I
------- |