DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENT

                            for

             EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS GUIDELINES

                            and

             NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS

                          for the
                TIRE AND SYNTHETIC SEGMENT
                OF THE RUBBER PROCESSING
                  POINT SOURCE CATEGORY
                     Russell  E.  Train
                      Administrator

                      Roger strelow
Acting Assistant Administrator for Mr 5 Water Programs
                       Allen  Cywin
          Director, Effluent  Guidelines Division

                      John  E.  Riley
                     Project  Officer
                      February 1974
               Effluent Guidelines Division
             Office of Air  and Water Programs
           U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency
                 Washington,  D.C.   20460
  For salt by the Superintendent ot Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.0.20402 - Price $2.25

-------

-------
                                ABSTRACT


This document presents the findings of a study of  the  tire  and  inner
tube  and synthetic rubber segments of the rubber processing industry by
Roy F. Weston, Inc. for the Environmental  Protection  Agency,  for  the
purpose  of developing effluent limitation guidelines, Federal standards
of  performance,  and  pretreatment  standards  for  the  industry,   to
implement  Sections  304,  306,  and  307 of the Federal Water Pollution
Control Act, as amended  (33 USC 1251, 1314, and 1316; 86 Stat 816).

Effluent limitation guidelines contained•herein set forth the degree  of
effluent  reduction  attainable  through  the  application  of  the best
practicable control technology currently available  and  the  degree  of
effluent  reduction  attainable  through  the  application  of  the best
available technology economically achievable, which must be achieved  by
existing  point  sources by July 1, 1977 land July 1, 1983, respectively.
The standards of Performance for new sources contained herein set  forth
the  degree  of  effluent  reduction  which  is  achievable  through the
application of  the  best  available  demonstrated  control  technology,
processes, operating methods, or other alternatives.

The  development  of  data and recommendations in the document relate to
the tire and inner tube and synthetic  rubber  segments  of  the  rubber
processing  industry.   These two segments are further divided into four
subcategories on the basis of the characteristics of  the  manufacturing
processes  involved.   Separate  effluent limitations were developed for
each category on the basis of the level of raw waste load as well as  on
the  degree  of  treatment achievable by suggested model systems.  These
systems include both biological and physical/  chemical  treatment,  and
for  the  synthetic  rubber  subcategories  treatment  of  the secondary
effluent by carbon adsorption.          :

Supportive data and  the  rationale  for:  development  of  the  proposed
effluent   limitation   guidelines  and !standards  of  performance  are
contained in this document.

-------

-------
                                 CONTENTS;
 section
        ABSTRACT                         :

        CONTENTS

        FIGURES

        TABLES

I       CONCLUSIONS

II      RECOMMENDATIONS

III     INTRODUCTION                      '

         Purpose and Authority           !
         Summary of Methods used  for Development of the
            Effluent Limitation Guidelines  and Standards
            of  Performance
         General Description of the  Industry
            Tire and Inner Tube Industry
                Tire Manufacture
                Inner Tube Manufacture
         Synthetic Rubber Industry
            General
            Synthetic Rubber Production  '
                Emulsion Crumb Production
                Solution crumb Production
                Latex Production
         Summary

IV     INDUSTRY CATEGORIZATION

         Introduction
         Tire and Inner Tube Industry   I
         Synthetic Rubber Industry

V      WASTE CHARACTERIZATION            ;

         Tire and Inner Tube Industry   ;
         Synthetic Rubber Industry
            General
            Emulsion Crumb Rubber Subcategory
            Solution Crumb Rubber Subcategory
            Latex Rubber Subcategory
111

v

ix

xi-xii

1

5

7

7
8
9
10
10
20
22
22
26
26
31
35
39

41

41
41
45

51

51
56
56
56
60
62

-------
VI     SELECTION OF POLLUTION  PARAMETERS

          Tire and Inner Tube  Industry
          Synthetic Rubber Industry

VII    CONTROL AND TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY

          Survey of selected Plants
             General Approach  and Summary
             Tire and Inner Tube Plants
             Synthetic Rubber  Plants
          Summary of Control and Treatment Technology
             Tires and Inner Tubes
             In-Plant Control
             End-of-Pipe Treatment
          Synthetic Rubber
             In-Plant Control
             End-of-Pipe Treatment

VIII   COST, ENERGY AND NON-WATER QUALITY ASPECTS

          Tire and Inner Tube  Industry
          Synthetic Rubber Industry
             Emulson Crumb Subcategory
             Solution Crumb Subcategory
             Latex Subcategory
          Detailed Cost Infomration for All Subcategories
Page

 65

 65
 73

 83

 83
 83
 83
 95
 m
 111
 111
 114
 115
 115
 117

 121

 121
 128
 128
 134
 138
 136
IX     BEST PRACTICABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY CURRENTLY
       AVAILABLE-EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS

          Tire and Inner Tube Facilities
             Identification of Best Practicable Control
                Technology Currently Available
             Effluent Loadings Attainable With Proposed
                Technologies
          Synthetic Rubber Industry
             Identification of Best Practic     Control
                Technology Currently Available
             Emulsion Crumb Subcategory
             Solution Crumb Subcategory
             Latex Subcategory
          Effluent Loadings Attainable With Proposed
               Technologies
             Emulsion Crumb Subcategory
             Solution Crumb Subcategory
             Latex Subcategory
 157

 157

 157

 159
 161

 161
 161
 162
 163

 163
 163
 164
 166
                               vi

-------
XI
XII

XIII

XIV

XV
BEST AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY ECONOMICALLY
ACHIEVABLE—EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS

  Tire and Inner Tube Industry
  Synthetic Rubber Industry
     Identification of Best Available Technology
        Economically Achievable    |
     Emulsion Crumb Subcategory
     Solution Crumb Subcategory
     Latex Subcategory             :             ^
  Effluent Loading Attainable with Proposed
          Technologies
     Emulsion Crumb Subcategory
     Solution Crumb Subcategory
     Latex Subcategory

NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS

   Tire and Inner Tube Industry
   Synthetic.Rubber Industry
   Pretreatment Recommendations
      Tire and Inner Tube Industry
      Synthetic Rubber Industry

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

REFERENCES                         !

GLOSSARY                           i

METRIC UNITS AND CONVERSION FACTORS
Page
,-**T«M-™

 171

 171
 171

 171
 171
 173
 173

 173
 174
 174
 175

 177

 177
 177
 177
 177
 178

 179

 181
 193
                               vi i

-------

-------
                                   FIGURES
 5


 6
 8


 9

10




11



12
Flow Diagram for Typical Tire and
  Camelback Production Facility

Flow Diagram for a Typical Inner Tubs
  Production Facility

General Water Flow Diagram for an Emulsion
  Polymerized 'Crumb Rubber Production
  Facility            ,,  .

General Water Flow Diagram for a Solution
  Polymerized Crumb Rubber Production
  Facility                            ,

General Water Flow Diagram for an 'Emulsion
  Latex Rubber Production Facility

Location of Tire Manufacturing Plants,
  Production Greater than 20,000 Units/Day,
  and Synthetic Rubber Production Plants,
  Production Greater than 60,000 Long Tons/
  Day, Within the U.S., 1972

Plant J:  Chemical Coagulation and Clarifi-
  cation Plus Sludge Handling System Followed
  by Bio-Oxidation Treatment

Plant K:  Air Flotation and Bio-Oxidation
  Wastewater Treatment Facility

Plant N:  Activated Sludge Waste Water
  Treatment  Facility
Hypothetical Waste Water Segregation and
  Treatment  Facility for Tire and Inner
  Tube  Plants

 Hypothetical End-of-pipe Secondary Waste Water
  Treatment  Facility for Synthetic Rubber
  Plants               I

 Hypothetical End-of-Pipe Advanced Waste Water
  Treatment  Facility for All Sub-categories
  of synthetic Rubber Plants
14


21



28



33


38
48



98


101


107


125



130



131
                               ix
                                      a
                                        \

-------

-------
                                 TABLES
Table

  1
   8


   9


  10


  n


  12


  13
             Title .

U.S. Tire and Inner Tube Production from ,
   1967-1971

Summary of Potential  Process-Associated
  ' Waste Water Sources from the Tire and
   Inner Tube Industry

U.S. Synthetic Rubber Production by Type
   for 1967-1971 and the Projected Growth
   Rate to 1980

Families of Synthetic Rubbers  Included in
   SIC 2822, Polymerization Processes, and
   Annual U.S. Production  (1972)

Summary of  Potential Process-Associated
   Waste Water Sources from Crumb-Rubber
    Production via  Emulsion Polymerization
    Processing

Summary of  Potential Process-Associated
    Waste Water  Sources from Crumb-Rubber
    Production via  Solution Polymerization
    Processing

 Summary  of  Potential  Process-Associated
    Waste  Water  Sources  from  Latex Production
    via Emulsion Polymerization Processing

 Major Tire  Production  Facilities in the
    United  States

 Raw Waste Loads of Untreated Effluent from
    Tire and Inner Tube Facilities

 Average Values of Raw Waste Loads from Tire
    Industry            ;

 Raw Waste Loads of Process Waste Waters from
    Tire and Inner Tube Facilities

 Raw Waste Loads for Emulsion Crumb Rubber
    Plants              ;

 Raw Waste Loads of the Principal  Individual
    Waste Water  Streams in an  Emulsion Crumb
    Rubber  Plant        ;
Page


 12



 19



 23



 25
  32




  36



  40


  43


  52


  54


  55


  57



  59
                                      XI

-------
                                                                         Page
 14


 15

 16



 17



 18

 19

 20


 21

 22
 23-39

 40


 41


 42


43


44
 Raw Waste loads for Solution Crumb
   Rubber Plants                                        61

 Raw Waste Loads for Latex Rubber Plants                63

 Waste Water Control and Treatment
   Technologies at Exemplary Tire and Inner
   Tube Plants                                          84

 Waste Water Control and Treatment
   Technologies at Exerrplary Synthetic
   Rubber Plants                                        85

 Older Tire and Inner Tube Production Facility          123

 Newer Tire Production Facility                         124

 Estimated Waste Water Treatment Costs
   - Emulsion Crumb Rubber                              133

 Estimated Waste Water Treatment Costs
   -Solution Crumb Rubber                               135
 Estimated Waste Water Treatment Costs -  Latex Rubber   137
 Support Cost Information                               140-156

 Raw Waste Load and Final Effluent from
   Tire  and Inner Tube  Facilities                      160

 Raw Waste Load and Final Effluent from
   Emulsion Crumb Plants                                165

 Raw Waste Load and Final Effluent from
   Solution Crumb Plants                                167

 Raw Waste Load and Final Effluent from
  Latex Rubber Plants                                  169

Conversion Factors                                     193
                                       xii

-------
                               SECTION I

                              CONCLUSIONS
Two major and distinct  segments  exist  within
industry:   1)  the tire and inner tube industry;
industry.
             the  rubber  processing
             2) the synthetic rubber
For the purpose of establishing limitations, tire and inner tube plants,
regardless of age and cost to implement control  procedures,  have  been
placed  in  one subcategory.  Factors such as the manufacturing process,
final product, raw  materials,  plant  size,  geographic  location,  air
pollution equipment, and the nature and treatability of waste waters are
similar  and  substantiate  the  subcategorization of the tire and inner
tube plants as one subcategory.

Process waste waters for  the  tire  and  inner  tube  industry  include
discharges  of  solutions used in the manufacturing process, washdown of
processing areas, run-off from raw material storage  areas,  and  spills
and  leakage  of  cooling  water,  steam,  processing solutions, organic
solvents and lubricating oils.  Primary pollutants in these waste waters
are oil and grease, suspended solids, and acidity and alkalinity  (pH) .

In the tire and inner tube industry, the emphasis  of  present  environ-
mental  quality  control  and  treatment  technologies  is placed on the
control of particulate emission  and  the  reduction  of  pollutants  in
nonprocess  waste  waters.  Control and treatment of many process waste-
waters has been given secondary priority.   As  a  result,  no  adequate
overall  control  and  treatment technology is employed by plants within
the industry.  A treatment system,  practicable  and  available  to  the
industry,   has   therefore  been  proposed   for  the  subcategory.   It
encompasses a combination of the various technologies  employed  by  the
different  segments  of the industry to control one or more constituents
in the process waste waters.
 Proposed effluent  limitations  and standards
 control  technology currently available are:
          for  the  best  practicable
          Suspended Solids

          Oil and Grease

          PH
0.061 kg/kkg (lb/1000 Ib)
of raw material
0.016 kg/kkg (lb/1000 Ib)
of raw material
6.0 to 9.0
 No  additional  reduction  is proposed for the limitations and standards
 represented by best available technology economically achievable or  for
 new sources coming on stream after the guidelines are put into effect.

 For  the  purpose  of  establishing  effluent limitations guidelines and
 standards of performance, the synthetic rubber industry  has  been  sub-
 categorized,  on  the  basis of processing techniques, product type, and
 waste water characterizations, into three separate subcategoriess

-------
     1.  Emulsion crumb
     2.  Solution crumb
     3.  Latex
           subc?tegories generate waste waters  which  contain  the  same
          c°nsttuents.   However, the concentration and loading of these
                      "raW WaSte load"' vary between  the  subcitegoriS?
                      nwat^n constituents are COD, BOD, suspended solids,
 alhnn   i™       T      ^ an? 9rease-  Late^ production waste waters ^
 although lower in flow  per  unit  of  production  than  the  other  two
 synthetic rubber subcategories, have the highest raw waste loads.

 The  waste  water  parameters selected to be the subject of the effluent
 limitations are COD, BOD, suspended  solids,  oil  and  grease  and  JH?
 These _ parameters  are present in the waste water as a result of organic
 contamination.  Heavy metals, cyanides and phenols  were  not  found  in

 walSe waSSrs.qUantitieS {l6SS than °'1 mg/L) ±n synthetic rufober process
   «,-
reductions.
                  andhtreatment/q technology, as practiced by the synthetic
                 • emphasizes end-of-pipe treatment rather  than  in- plant
               This is because in-plant modifications which might lead to
                                                           ^chnigues  or
    «     treatment  technology  for both emulsion crumb and latex plants
 involves   Primary  clarification  with  chemical  coagulation   of  la?ex
 SS lds' follow?d  ^y biological treatment.  As  an alternative to chemical
 coagulation,  air  flotation  clarification of primary  and secondary solids
 iL-  s"ccessfully   practiced.    Biological  treatment   systems  include
 JSSr     Si  r  Systems  and   Derated  lagoon  and   stabilization pond
 systems.   Best   practicable   control  technology currenty  available for
 emulsion crumb and latex plants has been defined  as  that   ShiJvSd  by
 chemical coagulation and biological treatment.

 Current  treatment  technology , for solution crumb requires  conventional
 SSX2 °lariJ:LCaJfon o?  rubfaer  solid   fines   followed  by biSogJcal
 treatment.    Existing biological treatment systems employ aerated lagoon
 and  stabilization  pond  systems  or  activated   sludge  plants.   Best
 SSSh^SS!; 4.?0n"b£°1. ^ec^logy  economically   achievable   for  solution
 crumb production  facilities has  been defined as   comparable  to   primary
 clarification and biological treatment.                           ^ j-uwry

 Best   available   technology   economically  achievable  for  the  three
 subcategories has  been defined  as  equivalent  to  dual-media  filtration
 followed  by  .activated  carbon  treatment  of  the  effluent  from  the
biological treatment system to achieve acceptable COD removal.

^^SoJKn  °f  Perf°fmance  for  new  sources  are  identical  to   best
practicable control technology currently avaiable.

-------
The  proposed  effluent  limitations  and  standards  of performance for
plants within the three synthetic rubber subcategories are summarized as
follows:  .
         Best Practicable control Technology currently Avaiable
              and Standards of Performance for New Sources
                  Emulsion Crumb       Solution Crumb       Latex
                      Plants               Plants           Plants
                    kg/kkg               kg/kkg '            kg/kkg
                  (lb/1000 Ib)         (lb/1000 Ib)        (lb/1000 Ib)
                  of product           of product         .of product
COD
BOD
Suspended solids
Oil and Grease
pH      .  . ,
8.00
0.40
0.65
0.16
6.0 to 9.0
3.92
0.40
0.65
0.16
6.0 to 9.0
6.85
0.34
0.55
0.14
6.0 to 9.0
           Best Available Technology .Economically Achievable
                  Emulsion Crumb        Solution Crumb      Latex
                      Plants                Plants          Plants
                kg/kkg  (lb/1000 Ib)   kg/kkg  (lb/1000 Ib)   kg/kkg  (lb/1COO Ib)
                     of product           of product        of product
COD
BOD
Suspended solids
Oil and Grease
pH
2.08
0.08
0.16
0.08
6.0 to 9.0
2.08
0.08
0.16
0.08
6.0 to 9.0
1.78
0.07
0.14
0.07
6.0 to 9oO

-------

-------
                               SECTION II

                            RECOMMENDATIONS
For plants in -the tire and inner  tube  subcategory  it  is  recommended
that,  wherever  possible,  process waste waters should be isolated from
nonprocess waste waters  to  permit  the  economical  treatment  of  the
process   waste  water  streams.   Treatment  of  combined  process  and
nonprocess waste waters may be more difficult and less effective due  to
dilution by the relatively large volume of nonprocess waste waters.

It  is  further suggested that uncontaminated waters, such as storm run-
off, be detoured from outdoor  areas  where  the  potential  exists  for
contamination  by oil or solids.  This could include roofing and curbing
of storage areas and the collection and treatment of runoff which cannot
be isolated from such areas.

The training of operators and maintenance personnel is important in  any
control  technology.   Negligent dumping of various processing solutions
and lubricants into unsegregated  drains  within  the  plant  should  be
eliminated  or  at  least  severely diminished.  Washdown of potentially
contaminated areas should be eliminated whenever possible.   The  number
and  location  of in-plant drains should be kept at a minimum, to reduce
the possibility of process waste water contamination to as  few  sources
as  possible.  Many of the tire and inner tube plants visited during the
study simply covered floor drains and curbed  machinery  and  -processing
areas to prevent the leakage of oil and grease and suspended solids into
the plant's main sewer system.
Wet  air  pollution  equipment  should ;be kept to a minimum.  Discharges
from wet equipment already in service should be recycled when  possible.
The  use  of  dry-type  pollution  equipment is consistent with recovery
efficiencies and prevention of waste water control problems.

In-plant modifications should be  considered  when  they  will  lead  to
reductions  in  waste  water  flow, increased quantity of water used for
recycle or reuse, and improvement in raw waste water quality.

End-of-pipe treatment technologies  equivalent  to  secondary  treatment
should  be  applied  to  the waste waters from all synthetic rubber sub-
categories to achieve best practicable technology  currently  available.
For   emulsion   crumb   and  latex  plants,  chemical  coagulation  and
clarification should be provided prior to biological treatment.

To  achieve  standards  for  best  available   technology   economically
achievable,  end-of-pipe  treatment  technolgies equivalent to activated
carbon adsorption of secondary treatment effluent  is  required  on  all
waste waters originating in synthetic rubber plants.

-------
Standards  of  performance  for  new  sources,  are  identical  to  best
practicable control technology currently  available  for  all  synthetic
rubber subcategories.

Synthetic   rubber  utility,  or  nonprocess,  waste  waters  as  boiler
blowdowns, cooling tower blowdowns, and water treatment plant wastes are
commonly  discharged  to  the  plants1  main   waste   water   treatment
facilities.   With  the exception of total dissolved solids and, in some
cases, heavy metals such as chromium and zinc, the  utility  wastes  are
adequately  treated  at  the  main  treatment  facility.   However,  the
control,  pretreatment,  and  treatment   technologies,   and   effluent
limitation  for  nonprocess  or  utility  waste  waters  in  the  rubber
manufacturing  subcategory  will  be  covered  by   effluent   guideline
documents and regulations promulgated separately and at a future date.

-------
                              SECTION III

                              INTRODUCTION
Purpose and Authority

Section  301(b)  of  the Act requires the achievement, by not later than
July 1, 1977, of effluent limitations  for  point  sources   (other  than
publicly-owned  treatment  works)  which are based on the application of
the "best practicable control technology currently available" as defined
by the Administrator pursuant to Section 304(b) of the Act.

section 301(b) also requires the achievement, by not later than July  1,
1983,  of  effluent  limitations for point sources  (other than publicly-
owned treatment works) which are based on the application of  the  "best
available  technology  economically  achievable"  which  will  result in
reasonable further progress toward the national goal of eliminating  the
discharge   of   all   pollutants,  as  determined  in  accordance  with
regulations issued by the Administrator pursuant to  Section  304 (b)  to
the Act.

Section  306  of  the  Act  requires the achievement by new sources of a
Federal standard of performance providing for the control  of  the  dis-
charge  of pollutants that would reflect the greatest degree of effluent
reduction which the Administrator determines to  be  achievable  through
the  application of the "best available:demonstrated control technology,
processes, operating methods, or other alternatives",  including,  where
practicable,  a standard permitting no discharge of pollutants.

Section  304(b) of the Act requires the! Administrator to publish, within
one year of enactment of the Act, regulations providing  guidelines  for
effluent limitations setting forth:

    1.   The  degree of effluent reduction  attainable  through  the  ap-
         plication  of the best practicable control technology currently
         available.

    2.   The  degree of effluent reduction  attainable  through  the  ap-
         plication of the best control measures and practices achievable
          (including  treatment  techniques,  process  and  procedure in-
         novations, operation methods, and other alternatives).

The  regulations  proposed  herein  set   forth   effluent   limitations
guidelines  pursuant to Section  304 (b) pf the Act for the tire and  inner
tube and the  synthetic rubber subcategories  of  the  Rubber  Processing
Industry.

Section 306 of the Act requires the Administrator, within one year  after
a  category   of  sources  is  included  in  a list published pursuant to
Section 306(b)  (1)  (A) of the Act, to propose  regulations   establishing
Federal   standards   of   performances  for  new   sources  within  such
categories.   The Administrator published, in  the  Federal	Register  of

-------
 January  16,  1973  (38  F.R.  1624),  a  list  of 27 source categories.
 Publication of the list constituted announcement of the  Administrator's
 intention  of  establishing, under Section 306, standards of performance
 applicable to new sources within the tire and inner tube  and  synthetic
 rubber  subcategories  of  the  rubber  processing  industry  which were
 included in the list published on January 16, 1973.

 The  guidelines  in  this  document  identify  (in  terms  of  chemical,
 physical,  and  biological  characteristics  of pollutants)  the level of
 pollutant reduction attainable  through  the  application  of  the  best
 practicable   control   technology  currently  available  and  the  best
 available technology  economically  achievable.    The  guidelines  also
 specify  factors  which must be considered in identifying the technology
 levels and in determining the control measures and practices  which  are
 to be applicable within given industrial categories or classes.

 In  addition  to  technical  factors,  the Act requires that a number of
 other factors be considered,  such as the costs or cost-benefit study and
 the   nonwater   quality   environmental   impacts   (including   energy
 requirements)  resulting from the application of such technologies.

          of  Methods   Used  for  Development of the Effluent Limitations
                                                              ~
Guidelines and standards of Performance

The  effluent  limitations  guidelines  and  standards
proposed herein were developed in a stepwise manner.
                                                        of
performance
The development of appropriate industry categories and subcategories and
the establishment of effluent guidelines and treatment standards require
a  sound  understanding  and  knowledge  of  the  rubber  industry,  the
processes   involved,   water   use,   recycle   and   reuse   patterns,
characteristics  of  waste water, the respective raw waste loadings, and
the capabilities of existing control and treatment methods.

Initial  categorizations  and  subcategorizations  were  based  on   raw
materails  used,  product  produced, manufacturing process employed, and
other factors such as plant age.  Published literature was consulted  to
verify  the  raw  waste  characteristics  and treatabilities in order to
support the initial  industry  categorizations  and  subcategorizations.
The  raw  waste characteristics for each tentative subcategory were then
fully identified.  Factors considered in this analysis were:  the supply
and volume of water used in the process employed; the sources  of  waste
and  waste  waters in the plant; and the constituents, including thermal
effects, of all waste waters together with those contaminants which  are
toxic or result in taste, odor, and color in water or aquatic organisms.
The  constituents  of  waste  waters which should be subject to effluent
limitations guidelines and standards of performance were identified.

The full range of control and  treatment  technologies  existing  within
each  subcategory  was  identified.   This involved an identification of
each distinct control and treatment technology (including both  in-plant
and  end-of-pipe  technologies)   which  are existent or capable of being
designed for each subcategory.   it also included  an  identification  in

-------
terms  of  the  amount  of constituents'(including thermal effects), the
chemical, physical, and biological characteristics  of  pollutants,   and
the  effluent  level  resulting  from  the  application  of  each of the
treatment     and     control     technologies.       The      problems,
limitations/reliability  of  each  treatment and control technology, and
the required implementation time were  also  identified  to  the  extent
possible.  In addition, the non-water quality environmental impact,  such
as  the  effects  of  the  application  of  such technologies upon other
pollution problems  (including air, solid waste,  noise,  and  radiation)
was  also identified to the extent possible.  The energy requirements of
each of the control and treatment technologies were identified  as  well
as the cost of the application of such technologies.

The  information,  as  outlined  above,  was  then evaluated in order to
determine what levels of technology constituted  the  "best  practicable
control  technology  currently available" the "best available technology
economically achievable", and the "best available  demonstrated  control
technology,  processes, operating methods, or other alternatives for new
sources",  factors were considered.  These included the  total  cost  of
application of technology in relation to the effluent reduction benefits
to  be  achieved  from  such  application,  the  age  of  equipment  and
facilities involved, the process employed, the  engineering  aspects  of
the  application  of various types of control technique process changes,
the   non-water   quality   environmental   impact    (including   energy
requirements), and other factors.

Raw  waste  water  characteristics  and;  treatability  data,  as well as
information pertinent to treatment  reliability  and  cost  evaluations,
were   obtained   from   several   sources,   including:   EPA  research
information,  published  literature.  Corps  of  Engineers   Permit   to
Discharge  Applications,  industry  historical data, and expert industry
consultation.

On-site visits and  interviews were made to selected  tire,  inner  tube,
and  synthetic  rubber production plants throughout the United States to
confirm  and  supplement  the  above  data.   All  factors   potentially
influencing  industry subcategorizations were represented by the on-site
visits.  Detailed information on production  schedules  and  capacities,
and  product breakdowns as well as water use and waste water control and
treatment management practices were  obtained.   Flow  diagrams  showing
water  uses  and  process waste water stream interactions ware prepared.
Control and treatment design data and cost  information  were  compiled.
Individual,  raw  and treated effluent streams were sampled and analyzed
to confirm company  furnished data  in  order  to  characterize  the  raw
wastes  and  determine  the  effectiveness  of the control and treatment
methods.  Duplicate samples were analyzed by the participating companies
to confirm the analytical results.     ',

General Description of the Industry

The categories of the rubber processing industry covered by  this  docu-
ment  are  the  tire  and inner tube  (SIC 3011) and the synthetic rubber
 (SIC  2822).   The  manufacture  of  tires  and  inner  tubes   utilizes

-------
 completely  different  processing  techniques  than  the  production  of
 synthetic  rubber.   in  a  tire  or  inner  tube  plant,  stock  rubber
 production  follows  a  very  definite  formulation  or recipe, and is a
 batching operation.

 The mixed stock production is used to produce the five  main  components
 of  a tire:  tire bead coating, tire treads, tire side wall, inner liner
 stock and coated cord fabric.  These  five  components  enter  the  tire
 building plant, where a significant amount of hand and machine lay-up is
 required to produce the green tires.

 The  synthetic  rubber (or vulcanizable elastomer)  industry is character
 ized essentially by the chemical process and unit  operations  necessary
  £ l.°0nve^t  the  Particular monomers or starting-block materials into a
 stabilized, granulated, extruded, or baled material  suitable  for  more
 conventional  rubber  processing.   The  processes   are characterized by
 separation of unreacted monomer, recovery, purification and  recycle  of
 the monomer, and processing of the converted elastomer.  These reactions
 are normally carried out batch-wise or batch/continuous.

 In  view  of  the fact that these two industry classifications> tire and
 inner tube manufacture and synthetic rubber production, differ consider-
 ably it is appropriate, from this point on,  to  describe  and  evaluate
 their water uses and waste water generations separately.

 Tire and Inner Tube Industry

 Tire Manufacture

 There are many events that have  had a significant effect  on  the tire and
 inner tube industry.   The. first  is the discovery, by  Charles  Goodyear in
 1839,   that  rubber  could  be  cured  or  vulcanized  with sulfur.  Thus,
 Goodyear was able to overcome the tacky, plastic  properties   of  rubber,
 thereby creating a product of commercial applicability  (1).

 The   year  1906   saw  the  development of the first  organic accelerators.
 Accelerators are substances which  affect   the  rate  of  vulcanization.
 With  the entry  of such substances,  better products could be  produced in
 a  shorter period of time  (1,2).

 The  next  major event to affect the  tire industry was  the advent of   the
 Second World  War.  With the drastic  reduction in the  supply of natural
 rubber, new  sources had to  be developed.   The first substitute  was   re-
 claimed ^rubber which, by 1943, had  completely replaced natural  rubber  as
 the  basic tire material,  it was not until the mid  1940«s that  synthetic
 rubber,  made  available  due to a major governmental effort, became the
 ma^or  substitute  for natural rubber.   By 1945, approximately 98  percent
 °,*i    u natural   rubber  had be'en replaced by this synthetic substitute
 (3).   The years  following the war saw  the return, to a great extent,  of
natural  rubber.   However,  with the  technological boost given the syn-
thetic rubber industry, it would soon  again become the larger portion of
    *

-------
The  next,  major  event  which  occurred  in  the  mid-1950's  was   the
introduction  of tubeless tires as original equipment on new cars.  This
development sent the inner tube industry into rapid decline.  The  total
number  of passenger car and motorcycle inner tube units dropped from in
excess of 49 million in 1954 to less than 25 million in 1955 (4).

The tire industry has had three eras of rapid expansion to coincide with
these events.  The post World War I era (1916-1929)  brought  the  first
such development.  As the automobile and truck industry expanded, so did
the tire industry.  Large capacity tire plants were built in Ohio, Cali-
fornia*  and  New  England.  The depression reversed this trend however,
and it was not until World War II created an increased demand for  tires
that  the  tire industry again began to expand.  New plants were erected
in Ohio, New England, and  the  South. '  The  third  building  expansion
started  in  the  early  1960's and is still proceeding, again occurring
simultaneously with the expansion of the economy.

With the current expansion, tire companies are  now  located  throughout
the United States.  Whereas the older plants of the first two expansions
are located in the urban areas of Ohio, California, and. New England, the
newer  plants  are  being  located  in  rural  areas  with no particular
emphasis placed on geography.

Today's tire manufacturer produces many types of tires  designed  for  a
multitute  of uses.  General product categories include passenger, truck
and bus, farm tractor and implement, and aircraft.  Table 1  presents  a
breakdown of these products for the last five years.

The  key  to  the  performance  of all tires is the selection of the raw
rubber and compounding materials and the proportion of  these  materials
in  any  particular  part  of the tire.  Basically, the tire consists of
five parts, namely:  the tread, the sidewall, the cord,  the  bead,  and
the   inner  liner.   Each  part  has  different  service  requirements;
therefore, each requires a different proportion of  the  raw  materials.
For  example, longevity and good traction are requirements of the tread,
whereas a high degree of flexibility is the requirement  for  sidewalls.
Basic  tire  ingredients  include  synthetic  rubbers,  natural  rubber,
various fillers,  extenders  and  reinforcers,  curing  and  accelerator
agents, antioxidants, and pigments.

A wide variety of synthetic rubbers are used including styrene budadiene
rubber  (SBR) , polybutadiene, butyl, polyisoprene, and ethylene-propylene
diene  rubber   (EPDM).  Of the three categories of compounding, materials
used, the fillers, extenders and reinforcers  are  the  most  important.
These are used:


    1,  To dilute the raw crumb rubber in order to produce a
        greater we ight or volume.

    2.  To increase the strength, hardness, and abrasion resistance to
        the  final product.
                               11

-------
                                     -*    vo    (TV   vo    co
                                     r-    cvi    o    cvi    ON
                                     t—   t—   -=f    •—    oo
                             t—
                            vo
                             CVJ
                                                       co    »—
                                                       ₯-   t-
                                                       CVI    CVI
                                     —    ON    •—    VO    CO
                                     ^f    co    co    t—    --+
                                     t—    ON    vo    in    cvj
                                       *****
                                     in    vo    *"    cvi    vo
                                     in    r-    t-    cS    £-
                                     cvi    cvi    cvi    cvi    cvi
      en
      c
H   ||

LO   '4^  ,
     1
      ID
 i- c
 O


 85
 L. a
I- E


 U 13
 10 C
   ID
                     23
                            =      s
                      ITl    O    --
                      vo    VD    ir»
                                     in    o    •—   vo    ON
                                    -=f   £r   cvi   vo    o
                                    -*   
-------
Of -these, carbon black and oil are -the most common.  A typical
rubber compound might be described as follows (1):

    100 parts rubber
    50 parts fillers, extenders, and reinforcers
    3,5 parts curing and accelerator agents
    8.0 parts antioxidants and pigments

The typical tire manufacturing process consists of the following:

    1.  Preparation or compounding of the raw materials.

    2.  Transformation of these compounded materials into the five tire
        components.                     >

    3.  The building, molding, and curing of the final product.

A flow diagram for the typical plant is shown in Figure 1.

The  basic  machinery  units  used  in the compounding operation are the
Banbury mixer and the roller mill.  A Banbury mixer is a batch-type  in-
ternal  mixing device and is the hub of this compounding operation.  The
Banbury is  used  for  two  operations.   In  the  first,  the  fillers,
extenders  and  reinforcing  agents,  and  the  pigments and antioxidant
agents are added and mixed into the raw  rubber  stock.   The  resulting
mixture  is  known  as  non-productive  or  non-reactive  rubber  stock.
Because no curing agents have been added, this material will have a long
shelf life, thus allowing large quantities of a particular recipe to  be
made  and stored for later use.  In the second operation, the curing and
accelerator agents, in additon to a small quantity of the original  list
of  elements,  are added.  This mixture, known as  productive or reactive
rubber stock, now meets the particular compounding requirements  of  its
final  destination.   Since  it contains the curing agents, this mixture
has a short shelf life and will be used almost immediately.

Carbon black and  oil  are  added  to  the  rubber in  the  compounding
operation.   To  avoid many of the housekeeping problems created by both
carbon black and oil, these ingredients'are added  automatically,  carbon
black is a finely divided amorphous material that  has the consistency of
dust and is easily airborne.  The compounding area is equipped with  air
pollution  equipment  to  control  this  problem.  Bag house particulate
collectors are normally used which can produce  removal  efficiences  of
essentially    100   percent  when  designed,  maintained,  and  operated
correctly.

After mixing, the compound is sheeted out in  a  roller  mill,  extruded
into  sheets,  or  pelletized.  The process depends on the type of batch
 (reactive  or non-reactive) and the manufacturer.   Pelletizing of a  non-
reactive   batch enables the weighing and mixing of the reactive stock to
be done  automatically.  The reactive compounded rubber is always sheeted
out.
                                  13

-------


s.
C
u-


PRODUG


ta
UJ

o
z

FIGURE
TYPICAL Tl
Of.
O
u.
s
o
o

si

Q£
_l
Of
at
Z
UJ
O
























»


•— _J
as _i
5 5
4

O
U.

>~
QS
C2
UJ C
•a o.
S S
as u













3E
Q
|—
; OS
oe
u,
€3
as
_j
"
eo
ea
ca
•<:
i
to
=K

ca
UJ -J
_J C3


DC

U.
CE
C3 «*
h-
o c/s
OS UJ
oa as
«: —
M— Mi
c
L
h
i
u
*
H

4
a:


a
u
h-
^
»


1


0 e
ca i—
>i
__
o.
=
t<
u
ca
as
ca
• £.

cc




ca
ac —
-I O_
^J CO


c/
c
JMMUJai


e
u
c
c
J
e
c




^_ CD jj.
l| 3S ~
s *



= s

O 1—
— ' CO
ea ^
9e




OS
1—
J k


_. OS
UJ S **>
SB


a
i
»
•
a
c
Q
C
e.
C3
H- Ul 3;
ca cs —
=3 ^ 0,
°s *— as re
o- co ^ co
4
§
£&<=£
— as a= LU
»— — •* OS

'
ca
— ca
=c ca ca as
co as as <—
as i— ca co
— se as —
u, — — a- •
^ OS —
cc
-
t
§ «-
ca ^^
ca
a: as ~~
LU -a: —
os o= 4—
H> U
r
as
ca .
ui — ca
OSH- caas
K-UJ 5 t-
a=S *
LU as <«
S- -
ca
l|

i_ oa
"t

se
C3

3E LU OS 0=
*= S30_ 0-
u. _j as o_ a.
Ul
C3 -J
—>• i



LU
s ca
3 CJ OS
= ^ C3
t _1 1—
3 03 CO








ca
_l UJ
ca *—
CD «

— t — = S ° ^S

CO Q
D_
co
Ul




C=> H-
11 1
4 — > -

Ul ^ 1—
UJ 2 c^ E
- s 14
J" = y_ 	 .„
* -i s w
-J * a ca

I
UJ LU
ea ca
LU OS
»— — I ca
LU C3 CO
OS
LU
LU
fl
05
_J
UJ
1—
UJ
1—
OS
UJ
H-

CO
eauj
"1
*^
LU LU
ca ca
co as
j
=>
CO




^


_J Q- — J UJ CO
— x ca uj — i
E uj co co 60

c/
LL
co u
	 —i ae
^" ™* —r «
60 _


CO




—
2
CS CO





1
«
SE
LU

ca
^ UJ
S*



0
u
c
^
I

J * l_
1 C3 aa;
' !-->!•
S 3

OS
n i
s *—

-------
The sheeted material is tacky and must be coated with a soapstone  solu-
tion.   This  solution  is  a  slurry  which, when allowed to dry on the
sheeted materials, prevents them from sticking together during storage.

Because it is a slurry the soapstone solution is  usually  recirculated.
Releasing  the  material  into  a  waste  water  stream  would  create a
difficult solids problem.  Spills in the soapstone area are  common  and
do create a maintenance and waste water;problem.  .

If  a manufacturer wishes to exclude soapstone in his final effluent, he
must provide a method for coping with these spills,  current  techniques
include  the blocking of all drains in the area, diking of the area, and
the use of steel grates on the floors. 'The diking and sealing of drains
prevents the slurry from entering the drainage system.  The use of steel
grates helps decrease the risk of workers slipping on spilled soapstone.

Maintenance and housekeeping problems in this area are  further  compli-
cated  by the leakages of oil and water from the oil seals in the mills,
and oil and dust from the dust ring seals of the Banburys.  Each has the
potential to become a waste water pollutant if allowed to mix  with  the
cooling  water  discharges  or  to be washed down and discharged without
treatment.

The rubber stock once compounded and mixed must be molded or transformed
into the form of one of the final parts of the tire.  This  consists  of
several  parallel  processes  by  which the sheeted rubber and other raw
materials, such as cord and fabric, are made into  the  following  basic
tire  components:   tire  beads,  tire treads, tire cords, and tire belt
 (fabric).  Tire beads are coated wires inserted in the pneumatic tire at
the point where the tire meets the steel  wheel  rim   (on  which  it  is
mounted); they insure a seal between the rim and the tire  (2).  The tire
treads  are  the  part  of  the  tire that meets the road surface; their
design and composition depend on the use of the tire.   Tire  cords  are
woven  synthetic  fabrics   (rayon,  nylon,  polyester)  impregnated with
rubber; they are the body of the tire and supply it  with  most  of  its
strength.   Tire  belts  stabilize  the,  tires  and  prevent the lateral
scrubbing or wiping action that causes tread wear.

In the formation of tire treads, the rubber stock as it is received from
the compounding section is manually fed to a warm-up roller mill.   Here
the  rubber  is  heated and further mixed.  Heat is provided by the con-
version of mechanical energy.  Temperature control is  provided  by  the
use of cooling water within the rolls of the mill.

The heated stock passes from the warm-up mill to a strip-feed mill where
it  receives  its final mixing.  This mill is also cooled to-control the
temperature of the stock.  The stock is peeled off the  rollers  of  the
mill in a thin strip which is fed continuously to an extruder.  'The mix-
ing  of  the stock in these mills insures that the final tread will have
homogeneous properties.  The heating or temperature control of the stock
is necessary to insure a proper extrusion with a minimum consumption  of
power  (2) .
                                  15

-------
At the  extruder, two  types  of  rubber  stocks originating  from two differ-
ent   strip  mills   are   joined  together  to  form   the  tire  tread and
sidewalls.  The tread leaves the extruder as a  continuous  strip  while
still  hot  and therefore tacky.  Next a cushioning  layer is attached to
the under side of the tread.   The tread is then cut  to the proper width,
cooled  in a water trough, labeled,  and then cut to   the  proper  length.
Trimmings  are  either manually  or  automatically transferred back to the
proper  strip-feed mill and  reprocessed.  The ends are coated with rubber
cement  and the tread  is  then placed in a "tread book" and
tire  building machines.
sent  to  the
Wastewater  problems in this area arise from the spillage of the solvent
base cements, from oil and water leakages from the  various  mills,  and
from  accidental  overflows  from the cooling water system.  The cooling
water overflow would not normally be a problem since the rubber tread is
relatively inert and therefore does not contaminate the water.  However,
it does serve as a washdown agent for an area contaminated with the  ce-
ments and oils.

TO produce tire cords and belts, rubber stock must be impregnated onto a
pretreated  fabric.  The fabric is let off a roll, spliced onto the tail
of the previous roll   (either  adhesively  or  by  a  high-speed  sewing
machine)r  and fed under controlled tension (via a festooner) to a latex
dip tank.  After dipping and while still under tension,  the  fabric  is
fed  past  vacuum  suction  lines  or rotating beater bars to remove the
excess dip before the fabric rises through a drying and baking oven.

After pretreatment, and  still  under  tension,  the  fabric  is  passed
through  a  calendering  machine  where  rubber  is impregnated into the
fabric.  The rubber fabric is next cooled by large water or  refrigerant
cooled  drums; after cooling, the tension can be released.  This treated
fabric is still not ready for the tire building operation.   To  achieve
the  proper bias it must be cut to the proper angle and length, and then
spliced together again.  The angle and length will vary depending on the
size of the tire for which it is used and whether it is a cord or  belt.
Once  spliced,  the  fabric  is  rolled  in  cloth  and sent to the tire
building.
The rubber used to impregnate the fabric proceeds through  an  operation
similar  to that of the tread process.  It passes through both a warm-up
mill and a strip-feed  mill  prior  to  impregnation  onto  the  fabric.
Wastewater  problems  in  this  area  arise  due  to  the latex dripping
operation and to problems with oil and water leaks and  spillages  which
are similar to those of the tread process.

Many tire manufacturers are transferring their latex dip operations from
individual  plants  to  one  large central facility.  In most cases, the
reasons behind such a decision are as follows:
    1.   A  minimal  dipping  operation   requires   a   large
expenditure.
     capital
                                  16

-------
         The fabric dipping and coating operation is one of the  fastest
         operations  in  the  plant  and, as such, is readily capable of
         over-supplying the plant with fabric.

         Dipped fabric is not that more expensive to ship then  undipped
         fabric.
    4.   The maintenance and housekeeping requirements of the dip
         ation are limited to one facility.
oper-
In  the processing of rubber stock to tire beads, the rubber is extruded
onto a series of copper-plated steel wires,  which  are  then  cemented,
wrapped, and cut.  The rubber stock is pretreated, as before, in a warm-
up  mill  and  strip-feed  mill.  Excess;rubber is trimmed from the bead
before it leaves the extruder and is fed;back to the strip  feed  mills.
To  apply  cement  the  coated wire is passed through a trough or set of
brushes.  The cement is necessary to insure the proper adhesion  of  the
bead when it is wrapped.

Wastewater  problems  can  arise due to the use of the mills or from the
spillage or overflow of the cement.  They will be similar in  nature  to
those found in this tread formation process.

The  inner lining for the tire is formed;by calendering or extruding the
rubber stock in a manner similar to either the formation of cord  fabric
or tread rubber.  It is this inner liner;that enables a tire to be tube-
less since it is light and air impervious.

The  tire  is  built  up  as a cylinder on a collapsible, round rotating
drum.  First the inner liner is applied to the  drum.   Then  layers  of
cord  are  applied,  one layer tying the:beads together in one direction
and another layer in the other direction.  The beads are attached to the
tire by folding over the ends of the cord fabric.  Next  the  tire  belt
fabric is laid onto the cord.  Finally the tire tread is placed over the
cords and fabric and wrapped around the beads.  The cylinder is removed.
These green tires  (uncured tires) are now ready for final processing.
                                         I
Before  molding  and  curing,  the  green  tire  is sprayed with release
agents.  These agents aid in the release of air  from  the  tire  during
molding  and  of  the  tire from the mold after curing.  Both water- and
solvent-based  sprays  are  used.   Excess  spray  is  released  to  the
atmosphere.   In  most  plants  the  tires  are  placed in a hood during
spraying to reduce atomospheric contamination.  Wastewater is  generated
by wet scrubbers where used to scrub the excess spray from the air.

The  potential  for  waste water streams; exist due to the possibility of
solvent spills within this area.  If wet scrubbers are used to scrub the
excess spray from the air, another waste water stream will exist.

The tire is molded and cured in an automatic press.  Here an  inflatable
rubber bladder bag is inflated inside the tire, causing the tire to take
its  characteristic  doughnut  shape.  The mold is simultaneously closed
over the shaped tire.  Heat is applied by steam via the mold and bladder
                                  17

-------
 bag.  Excess rubber and trapped air escape through weepholes.    After  a
 timed,  temperature-controlled cure, the press is cooled,  the  bladder is
 deflated via a vacuum, and the tire is removed.   The tire   is   next  in-
 flated with air and left to cool in the atmosphere.   This  last inflation
 insures  product quality and uniformity by allowing the tire to "set up"
 or achieve the final limits of its cure under controlled conditions.

 Because of the large number of presses in the typical  plant,   there  is
 always_the potential for a mold to leak or for a bladder to break.   This
 water is released and scavenges some of the large amounts  of lubricating
 oil  used  in  this area.   This oily water creates a water contamination
 problem if it is discharged.

 After the molding and curing operations,  the tire proceeds to  the grind-
 ing  operation  where  the  excess  rubber  which  escaped  through  the
 weepholes  is  ground off.   if the tire is designated to be a  whitewall,
 additional grinding is performed to remove  a  black  protective strip.
 Most tires receive further grinding of the tread in  order  to balance the
 tire.

 The  weepholes  which  are  ground off are relatively large particles of
 rubber which fall to the floor and are swept up.   Their final  destina-
 tion is a landfill.   The grindings from the white sidewall operation are
 relatively  small  and will stay airborne for long periods of  time.   The
 industry generally uses a  particulate collection device such as  cyclone
 or  wet  scrubber  to control  these emissions.   The  discharge  from  a wet
 scrubber will have a high  solids content  and will therefore be a waste-
 water problem.   The  balancing  operation suffers  the  same problems as the
 white sidewall grinding operation.

 After  the grinding  operations,  the whitewall portion of a tire  receives
 a  protective coat of paint.  The paint is generally  water   based.    This
 operation usually occurs in a  hooded area.   Again, any wet air pollution
 equipment  or  runoff due  to over spraying of the paint will create  pol-
 lution problems.   After inspection  and possibly  some final repairs,   the
 tire is ready to be  shipped.
Table  2  presents  a  review
streams as discussed above.
of  the  potential sources of waste water
The discussion thus far has described a typical tire plant, and  applies
most readily to the production of the passenger tire.  There are several
variations.   The  first  of these is due to the production of truck and
industrial tires.  Truck tires tend to have a greater amount of  natural
rubber  in  their  treads.  Natural rubber, as received in the plant, is
much harder to handle than synthetic rubber.   Additional  roller  mills
are  needed  to  break  up  and  soften  the rubber before it enters the
Banbury mixer.  There are also major differences  in  the  building  and
molding  of  the tires as the larger sizes are approached.  The building
of a «giant off-the-road tire" requires the services of two men each for
a half a day, whereas the passenger tire can be built  in  less  than  5
minutes.   Larger tires are cured in giant molds which are not automati-
cally operated.  Cranes or hoists are required to open and  close  these
                                 18

-------
       (0  U
       3  4J
       0)  m
       4->  3
       in -o
       re  c
      -o  a)
       0) J3
in of Wastewater Contaminants
cr
•—
i_
o

•o
c
to

to

'3

O-
13
a>
O
D-
re
o
in

E
O

14-,

in
"O
•—
— O
o to
in
'rti
tn to
•— in
»- -Q
to c
•— to
— CO
o
!_ E
C S-
— l*-

tn in
— -0
(D —
a) F—
tn o
in

-o
)- c
4- ,(D

._ .—
O O
pollution equipment discharge
i_
•_ .
to

E
O

i^-

in
-o
.—
O

-based cements from the cementing operation
4J
C
a>
>

o
in

-o
C
to

._
o
i
i
in
'i'
v.
o> .
"o
L~ '
c

in
^— '
re
o>
in

E:
0
l_ .
M-

,_
0
lids from dipping operation
o


-o
c
re

m
o
*•»
c
re
CD
o
o
4->
0)
in
a)
c
re
o
•V
tn
'i
to
"o
u
C
A
in
*~.
re
0)
in

E
O
t
if_

._
O
lids from spray painting operation
0
in

-£j
c
re

in
0

c
re
cn
o
o
"o
p.
re
H-
m
T3
"o
in
TJ
C (U
re 01
' U
m re
O JC
— o
c tn
re —
O1T3

O 4-*
c
o a)
— E
O O •
3 .-
O cr

E
to
in
in
O
— m
3 <0
to in
u in
-o to

£ D.

E-E
O 0

M— M—

•— •—
0 O
ble organ ics from painting operation
pollution equipment discharge
3 1-

o re
tn


C S-
to ^-

m in
-o -o

"o "o
to to
10
       in "O
       tn  c
       a)  (D
       U
       O  (U
       l_  t_
       Q- ~
       (0  (1)
       (U  E
       4-J  O
       O  1-
       Q. l(-


       <4-  I/)
       O  0)
           o
       >,  !_
       I-  3
       (D  O


       1 *"
       3
       CO
                                     (0  4-  CT         Q.
 in      a)         in
    in
  « 0)  c
 C  O^ O         C

 o  re  4-»         o
•o  j:  3         -o
^  o  —         j:
 tn  in  —         tn
 re  —  o         re
3  -a  a.         3
                                     re
                                     a)
                                             a.
                                             m
tn
re
                                                                       tn
                                                                       _y
                                                                       nj
                                                                       a)
 o
•o
.c
 tn
 
                                  re
                              •a  E
                               u  s_
                               O  O
                              O  U-
                                                                              01
                                                                              c
                                                                              re
                                                                             a.
                       c
                       a>
                       a>
                                                                                             en
                                                                                             c
                                                               -o
                                                                C
                                                                to

                                                                en
                                                                c

                                                               -a

                                                               "o
           _c
            in

            C

           U.

            (U
                                                         19

-------
 molds. _  Curing can take up to 2H hours.   Hot water,  instead of steam,  is
 used  in  the  curing operation.  The process variations associated with
 truck and industrial tire production do  not have a significant effect  on
 the quantity and quality of the waste waters generated when compared  to
 those from automobile tire production.

 Another   variation  in the typical tire  production is the manufacture  of
 camelback.  Camelback is tread used for  tire retreading (2) .   It is pro-
 duced in the same manner as tread  used   for  newer   tires.    (See  flow
 diagram,  Figure  1.)   since camelback production operations  are usually
 part of  a tire production facility feeding off the same machinery, waste
 water problems will be similar to those  already discussed.

 Radial tire production offers another variation to the overall  process.
 Radial   tires,  like  truck tires,  contain more natural rubber,  thus re-
 quiring  more machinery in the compounding area.   Whereas bias-ply  tires
 are  built  in  the form of a hollow cylinder,  radial tires are  built  in
 the doughnut shape of the final product.   Like truck  tires, radial tires
 are cured using -hot water instead of steam.   Again waste water  problems
 will be  very similar to those of the typical passenger tire manufacture.
Inner  tube  manufacture  is very  similar to tire manufacture  in that the
process consists of the following steps:
     1.
     2.
     3.
Preparation or compounding of the raw materials.
The extension of these compounded materials to form a tube.
The building, molding, and curing to form the final product.
A flow diagram for the typical process is shown in Figure 2.

The basic machinery used in the compounding operation is similar to that
used in tire manufacture; namely, Banbury mixers and roller mills.  Both
non-reactive and reactive stocks are prepared,  one minor distinction of
inner tube manufacture is the high usage of butyl rubbers,  in addition,
a soap rather than a soapstone solution is sometimes used  to  coat  the
non-reactive  stock.  The soap solution is not discharged and is used in
a completely closed-loop system  with  solution  make-up.   in  general,
waste  water  problems arising from this section are similar to those of
the typical compounding area of a tire  plant;  that  is,  leakages  and
drippings of oily and particulate material.

The  process  by which the tube is formed is similar to the extrusion of
the tread.  The compounded rubber is fed to an extruder  via  a  warm-up
mill and strip-feed mill.  Here the rubber is extruded into a continuous
cylinder.   To  keep  the inside of the tube walls from sticking to each
other, a dry soapstone powder is sprayed inside the tube as it is formed
in the extruder.   The tube  is  labelled  and  passed  through  a  water
cooling  tank.   After  cooling,  the  water  is  blown off the tube and
soapstone powder is sprayed on the outside of the tube.    Excess  powder
must  be  collected  in either a dry or wet collection device.  If a wet
collection device is used, the discharge  will  be  heavily  laden  with
                                 20

-------
O

-------
solids.   Other  waste  water problems are similar to those found in the
tread formation process of tire manufacture.

Once extruded, the tube must be cut to length and the ends  spliced  to-
gether.   A  valve  must also be attached.  There is no potential waste-
water problem arising from this area of operation.

Once formed, the tube must be molded and cured.  Again,  this  operation
is  very  similar  to that of the tire manufacture.  Wastewater problems
include only water leakage and spills.

After curing, the tube is inspected for defects, packaged  and  sent  to
warehousing  and  shipping.  Table 2 summarizes the potential sources of
waste water streams as discussed above.

Synthetic Rubber Industry

General

The synthetic rubber industry is responsible for the sythesis of vulcan-
izable elastomers by polymerization or co-polymerization processes.  For
the purpose of this classification, an elastomer is  a  rubber-like  ma-
terial capable of vulcanization.

The  U.S.  Synthetic Rubber Industry was fostered by the commencement of
World War II when it was realized that supplies of natural rubber  could
be  shut  off  by the enemy.  The rubber first chosen for production was
called GR-S (Government Rubber-Styrene) and would now be  grouped  under
SBR  (styrene-butadiene  rubber).   Since  the  war the price of natural
rubber has  been  subject  to  great  fluctuations,  whereas  the  price
stability  of  synthetic  rubbers  has  undoubtedly contributed to their
acceptance by the consumer.  Since the introduction of  GR-S,  many  new
synthetic  rubbers  have  been  synthesized and produced on a commercial
scale.

The demand for the various types of synthetic rubber is greatly affected
by the needs of the tire manufacturers.  Not only are tire sales  impor-
tant,  but process and product changes within the tire industry also in-
fluence the relative demands for  the  various  rubbers.   For  example,
radial  tires  at  present contain considerably more natural rubber than
conventional tires.  At this moment, this has little effect on the  con-
sumption  of  synthetic  rubber  because radial tires constitute a small
percentage of total tire production, but it does illustrate the kind  of
factor  which can influence synthetic rubber consumption.  The U.S. pro-
duction of the principal synthetic rubbers for the last several years is
presented in Table 3 together with the growth projections for the period
between now and 1980.  It can be seen that production of SBR-type rubber
overshadows other synthetic rubber.  Although the greatest growth  rates
over  the  next  several  years will be associated with polyisoprene and
ethylene-propylene terpolymer (EPT) productions,  overall  the  relative
levels  of synthetic rubber production will not be appreciably different
from what they  are  today  because  the  present  base  productions  of
polyisoprene  and  EPT  are  considerably  lower  than  that of SBR, the
                                22

-------
CM     i—    O     I--     T—
i—     OA    LA    CT\     -4"
4-

^-^
in
c o
oco
i— •
Ql
c o
04,

O •"••^
•— O
Jj J^
U D-
3

"o JS

a.

I- C
a) TO
o
^ ^_
3 r^»
a: O~>

o
•— o

 a)

>- >•
j: a
4J O
LU U
Q-

0)
c

L.
a
o
in

^,
,-v
O
Q-




0)

4)
•a
TO
4-1
3

•s»
PH.
O
o_





• ^
•z.




4-
cc


a)
Q
>
•7
tf
















T^ ^^1 V'*! W>J


\O T- r- CO
00 0 0 .-
i— CM CM CM









LA CA
r**« vo



LA C >
o -•




) 1


CM
CM |
CM


LA O

O""l O~\


; O O

O
vO O O
• •
VO O
«»• r—

LA O
f^v OO
o> o\
t— f-M
r- O 0
T- 4-14-1

O O
• *
VD OO









j- o
LA •
CM r--












LA CM

LA





O -
r- CM


l~^ -*
5-^ rA


^— s.
•^p
tf^
(D
D Q)
C 4J

1 ^ e^
p
,- : -o _c
r**^ CD 4->
O"\ -M 5
i- O O

•— 10
: 0
u
Q.























































i-

4-1
in
•—
TO
4_t
CO

•»
™
in
4-J
O
10
LU.

^^
U.
4-1
in
3
-o
C
_


0)
-Q
ja
3
o
L-
(0
TO
-o
C
0
•—

o
3
-a
0
1_
Q-


• •
in
(U
0

3
O
CO

























.
^
u
0
^~

3
0)


•»
•
u
c

«v


4-J
V)
I>*
CO

£
CD
.£!
o

3***
-Q

•o
(U
x:
in

c
l_
3
M-
in
a)
2

1
cn
c
0


o
3
-a
0

a_











-------
 principal synthetic rubber (5).   This supports the assumption that there
 will be no radical changes in the industry,  its products, and  even  its
 production processes in the foreseeable future.

 The synthetic rubbers as listed under SIC 2822 include both the socalled
 tire  rubbers and the specialty rubbers.   The tire rubbers are typically
 high production volume commodities,  and,  as  their  name  suggests,  they
 are  used  predominantly  by the tire industry.  Rubber used in the tire
 industry is supplied in a  solid  form  termed  crumb  rubber.    Several
 different  families  of tire rubber  are made in order to provide all the
 essential and varying properties required in a modern vehicle tire.

 Not all tire rubber production is used  in  tire  manufacture,   however.
 Much  is  used  to manufacture rubber hose,  belting,  electrical wire and
 cable,  footwear, mechanical rubber goods,  and  many  other  rubber-based
 products.    Due  to their superior oil and heat resistance,  both nitrile
 and neoprene type rubbers are used more for  hose,  seals,  gaskets,  and O-
 rings  than  for  tire  manufacture.    However,  because  their   annual
 production

 volume  is  comparable with four of the other  five major synthetic rubbers
 used ^in tire manufacture,  they will  be considered here as tire rubbers.
 The tire  rubbers  are  grouped  into  seven  families ^ based  on  their
 monomeric   ingredients as shown  in Table  4.   The annual U.S.  production,
 polymerization process,  principal end-use  and other family  members   are
 also presented.

 By    contrast,    the   speciality rubbers  are  low   production  volume
 commodities with more diverse compositions and end uses.    The  largest
 production  volume  family  of   the speciality rubbers are the  butadiene
 rubbers.   Butadiene rubbers are   generally  sold  in   latex  form.    The
 production  is  similar to the production of  all synthetic rubber latexes
 (2) .  Epichlorohydrin is solution polymerized with various  monomers   to
 produce the  family of  epichlorohydrin co-polymer rubbers.   The process
 is  similar to that for solution  tire  rubbers.    Epichlorohydrin  rubbers
 are used for seals,  gaskets,  and O-rings,  etc.  (6).   The  acrylic rubbers
 areproduced by  an emulsion  polymerization  process  similar tothe emulsion
 processes   used   for  the  tire   rubbers.    Acrylics   are  used for high
 temperature service in drive=train snd axle   seals,   hose,   tubing,   and
 molded   parrs.   Polyisobutylene  is produced  by a solution polymerization
 process  similar  to that  for butyl rubber  (1).   It  is  used primarily as a
 blend in caulking compounds,  adhesives, and  plastics.

 Three of the so-called  specialty rubber  families   (silicone   rubbers,
 urethane rubbers,  and  fluorocarbon derivative  rubbers)  are being studied
 as   part  of  the  plastics industry and, as such, are  not  covered in this
 document.   The chlorinated  and chlorosulfonated polyethylene  rubbers  are
 manufactured  by  processes similar to those employed for the  polyethylene
 type plastics and are  not covered in this  document  (2).   The  polysulfide
 rubbers  are  produced by  a condensation  process  which  is   different  from
 the  general  emulsion and solution polymerizations  (2).  In addition, the
waste waters  generated by polysulfide production are  highly contaminated
 and  deemed   more   difficult  to  treat  than  the waste waters  produced by
                                24

-------
                                                                               TABLE  4

                       Families of Synthetic Rubbers Included In SIC 2822, Polymerization Processes, and Annual U.S. Production  (1972)
Annua 1 U.S. P roduct ! on
(1,000 Metric Tons/year)
1,678
139
368
139
163
169
159
.177
2,992
6k
9
2
k
10
M
\
15
10
129
3,121
Polymerization
Process
Emu 1 s I on
Solution
Solution
Solution
Solu'tlon
Solution
Emulsion
Emu 1 s I on
Emu 1 £ i on
Solution
Emul,sion
Solution
Condensation
Condensation
Emu 1 s I on
Pos t-po 1 yme r i za -
tlon chlorination
Condensation
Principal End-use
General tire use
Tire treads
Tire treads
Tire treads
Inner tubes
Genera] tire use, non-tire
goods
Hose, seals, gaskets,
0-rings
Non-tire use, general tire
use
Adhesives, dipped goods,
paints
Seals, gaskets and Orrings
Seals, hosing, tubing
Caulking, adheslves,
plastics
Seals, gaskets, electri-
cal tape
Sol id tires, rollers,
foams, fibers
Seals, gaskets, O-rlng,
high temperature service
Wire and cable, shoes,
1 Inlngs, pa Ints
Sealing, glazing, hose
Other Family Members




EPDM

Neoprene, Nitrile-Chloro-
prene rubber, Styrene-
Chloroprene rubber
Pyrld tne-Butad lene
rubber
Cyclo rubber
Aery I ate type rubber,
Aery late-Butadiene rubber


Adlprene, Estane, Iso-
cynate type rubber
Vlton, Fluoro rubber
Chlorinated rubber,
Hypalon
Thlol
        Principal Synthetic Rubber

             T_i£e_Ru_bber_s
Styrene-Butadiene rubbers (SBR)


Polybutadlene rubbers (PBR)

Polylsoprene rubbers

Polylsobutylene-lsoprene rubbers (Butyl)

Ethylene-PropyJene Co-polymer rubbers (EPR)


Acrylonitrlle-Butadlene rubbers (Nltrile)1


Polychloroprene rubber (Neoprene)

     Tire Rubber Sub-Total:

            S_pec_iaj_ty_ .Rubbery
Butadiene rubbers             '


Epichlorohydrln rubber

AcrylIc rubbers


Polylsobutylene rubbers


S111cone rubbers


Polyurethane rubbers


Fluorocarbon derivative rubbers


Chlorosulfonated Polyethylenes

                   L
Polysulfide rubbers

     Specialty Rubber Sub-Total

     Synthetic Rubber Total
 1   Although Nitrlle and Neoprene-type  rubbers are not normally  termed tire  rubbers, they are  relatively  large production volume   rubbers and, for convenience,
    can be  Included with the major tire  rubbers.

 2   SlUcone, Polyurethane and  Fluorocarbon derivative rubbers are considered part ofrthe Plastics and Synthetics  Industry and are not covered by this
    document.

 3   Chlorosulfonated   and chlorinated polyethylenes  should be considered  part of  the PJastics  and Synthetics  Industry.  They are not covered by this
    document.

 4.    Polysulfide   rubbers are produced  by  a condensation-type reaction which is not directly comparable to either emulsion or solution polymerization.
      Per  unit of  rubber production,  generated wastewaters are of considerably poorer quality and more  troublesome  to  treat than those of either emulsion
      or solution  or solution processes.    Polysulffde  rubber production  is not  covered  by this document.   It  is  recommended that a separate study be made
      of the polysulflde rubber  Industry.

      Source:  "The Rubber Industry Statistical Report" - C.F. Ruebensaal, International  Institute of Synthetic Rubber Producers, Inc.
                                                                               25

-------
 conventional emulsion  or  solution  polymerization  processes.    it  is
 therefore intended that a separate study will be made of the polysulfide
 rubber sector of the synthetic rubber industry.

 The  various  methods of production of the synthetic rubber have much in
 common.   The monomers  are  not  particularly  difficult  to  handle  at
 reasonable  pressures,   and  suitable  inhibitors have been developed to
 impart storage stability.   Dissipation of the heat of polymerization  is
 frequently  the  controlling consideration.   Adjustment of reaction  rate
 to distribute the heat  generation over a reasonable period of time,   the
 use  of  refrigeration   cooling,   and  operation in dilute media such as
 emulsions or  solutions  are  necessary  for  the  adequate  control  of
 polymerization reactions.

 Control  of  molecular weight and  of molecular configuration has  become a
 very important quality  consideration.   The ability to control molecular
 weight  has   led to the development of oil-extended rubber.   It  has  been
 found that rubber of unusually high molecular weight  and  normally   too
 tough  to process through factory equipment can be made workable by the
 addition of  up to 50 parts of  petroleum-base oils  per  100 parts  of
 rubber.    These extending  oils make the rubber easier to process without
 sacrifice in physical properties.    Another   improvement  has been   the
 preparation  of black masterbatches,  the name given to mixtures of carbon
 black and  rubber  without  the  curing ingredients.   This process is  of
 great importance to small  manufacturers and   tire  retreaders who   lack
 facilities  for  mixing in carbon black or who wish to avoid atmospheric
 pollution with the fine black.

 Synthetic Rubber Production

 Emulsion Crumb Production

 Of  the several methods  of  polymerization employed to  produce synthetic
 rubber,    the    two  most   commonly   used   processing  techniques   are
 polymerization in homogeneous solution and  polymerization in emulsion.
 Solution polymerization may be  considered to include bulk polymerization
where excess   monomer  serves as  a solvent.   Emulsion polymerization may
be  considered   as  the   bulk  polymerization  of   droplets  of   monomers
 suspended   in   water.   • Emulsion  polymerization  is   performed  with
 si  ficient  emulsifier  to  maintain   a    stable    emulsion.     Solution
 polymerizations   generally  proceed by ionic mechanisms„   Polymerization
initiators_which  operate by ionic  mechanisms are  usually  too  reactive to
be  stable  in water,  emulsion  polymerization  systems   are  initiated  by
agents which produce free  radicals  (2).

Emulsion polymerization is the traditional process  for the production of
synthetic  rubber.   Since  World War II  (and  for the  foreseeable future)',
the   bulk  of  synthetic  rubber  has   been   produced   via   emulsion
polymerization.   The  use  of emulsion polymerization systems is common
because both high  conversion  rates   and  high   molecular  weights  are
possible.   In  addition, other advantages are:  a high rate of transfer
of the heat of polymerization through the aqueous phase,  ready  removal
cC  unreacted monomers, and high fluidity even at high concentrations of
                                26

-------
polymer.  The majority  (more  than  90  percent)  of  styrene-butadiene
rubber  (SBR),  the  principal synthetic rubber, is produced by emulsion
polymerization.  The emulsion polymerization process is used to  produce
either  rubber  latex  or  rubber  crumb.  Crumb is solid and is usually
formed into 75 pound bales.

Figure 3 shows a generalized materials flow diagram for  the  continuous
production  of  crumb  SBR by the emulsion polymerization process.  This
schematic is essentially typical of  all  emulsion  processes.   In  the
typical production facility, operation^ is 24 hours per day, 365 days per
year.   Each  plant consists of several production lines where different
process recipes can be applied and various types of SBR can be produced,
including non-extended, oil extended, and carbon black masterbatch vari-
eties.

Styrene and butadiene  (monomers)  are either  piped  to  the  plant  from
adjacent  suppliers,  or  shipped  in  by  tank  car or tank truck.  The
monomers are stored in a tank  farm  which  is  diked  to  retain  major
monomers  spills  and  leakages and, in the case of fire, to control the
spread of flaming liquid.   The fresh monomers are  piped  to  the  plant
from  the  tank  farm  and,  if necessary, passed through a caustic soda
scrubber before mixing with recycle monomers.  Some  monomers,  such  as
butadiene,  have  inhibitors  added  to prevent premature polymerization
during shipment and storage.  These must be removed before  the  monomer
can be polymerized.  The inhibitor is removed in the caustic scrubber by
the  circulation  of  a caustic soda solution, approximately 20 percent.
The caustic soda solution is discarded periodically or can be  subjected
to continual make-up and blowdown.    i

Soap  solution,  catalyst,  activator,  and  modifier  are  added to the
monomer mixture prior to entering the polymerization reactors.  The soap
solution is used to produce an emulsion of the monomers  in  an  aqueous
medium.   The  principal  ingredients  of  this solution are generally a
rosin acid soap and a fatty acid soap.  The catalyst is a  free  radical
initiator  and  can be a hydroperoxide or a peroxysulfate.  The catalyst
initiates and  promotes  the  polymerization  reaction.   The  activator
assists  in  generating  the  free  radicals  more  rapidly and at lower
temperatures than by thermal,decomposition of the catalyst  alone.   The
modifier  is  an  additive  which adjusts the chain length and molecular
weight distribution of the rubber product during polymerization.  It  is
necessary  that all the above solutions be made with high quality water.
Usually city or well water is  deionized  for  the  preparation  of  the
solutions.

The  polymerization  proceeds stepwise through a train of reactors.  The
reactor system is capable of producing either "  (40-45°F, 0-15 psig)   or
"hot"   (122°F, 40-60 psig) rubber.  The "cold" SBR polymers, produced at
the lower temperature and stopped at 60  percent  conversion,  have  im-
proved  properties  when  compared to "hot" SBR's.  The "hot" process is
the older of the two.  For "cold" polymerization,  the  monomer-additive
emulsion is cooled prior to entering the reactors, generally by using an
ammonia  refrigerant  cooling  medium.,;   Depending on the polymerization
temperature, the medium could be chilled brine or chilled water.  In ad-
                               27

-------
    O
    O
    2
    a.
    a:
    UJ
    to
    co
    Of
    CO

    i
    O
    at
   UJ


   O
   a.
r»
ui Z
2 O
S* to
u. _j


   UI
   5
   o
   UI

   £
   UI

   UI
   o
                                                                                            - as- *=
                                                     2?,

-------
dition, each reactor has its own set of cooling coils, usually  contain-
ing ammonia refrigerant, and is agitated by a mixer.  The residence time
in each reactor is approximately one hour.  Any reactor in the train can
be  by-passed.  The reactor system contributes significantly to the high
degree of flexibility of the overall plant in producing different grades
of rubber.  The overall polymerization reaction is ordinarily carried to
no greater than 60 percent conversion of monomer  to  rubber  since  the
rate of reaction falls off beyond this point and product quality  begins
to  deteriorate.   The product rubber is formed in the emulsion phase of
the reaction mixture.  The reaction mixture is a  milky  white  emulsion
called latex.

Short  stop  solution is added to the latex leaving the reactors to stop
the polymerization at the desired conversion.   Two  common  short  stop
ingredient  are  sodium  dimethyl dithiocarbamate and hydroquinone.  The
"stopped" latex is  held  in  blowdown  tanks  prior  to  the  stripping
operation.  The blowdown tanks act as flow regulating holding tanks.

Recovery  of  the  unreacted  monomers  and  their  purification  is  an
essential step in  economic  synthetic  rubber  production.   Butadiene,
which  has a lower boiling point than styrene,  is first vacuum stripped
from the latex.  The stripping operation is generally carried out  in  a
vacuum flash tank at about 80-90°F.  The butadiene vapors are compressed
and  condensed  before  entering  a  receiver.  A very small quantity of
water collects in the receiver  and  is  discharged  periodically.   The
condensed  butadiene  is  recycled to the feed area and mixed with fresh
monomer prior to the polymerization step.   Styrene  recovery  from  the
latex  usually takes place in perforated plate stripping columns.  These
operate with steam injection at approximately 140°F.  The  steam-styrene
vapor  mixture is condensed and sent to a receiver where the styrene and
water  are decanted.  The top styrene layer is recycled  to  the  monomer
feed   stage;  the. bottom  layer of the receiver, which is styrene-laden
water,  is  discharged.   Both  the  vacuum  and  steam  strippers  foul
periodically  with  rubber  solids.   These  must  be  removed  by hand,
followed with both steam or water jets.  This  cleaning  operation  puts
the  stripper  out  of  commission and produces large quantities of waste
water.

An antioxidant to protect the rubber from attack by oxygen and ozone  is
added  to  the  stripped  latex  in  a  ; blend  tank.   The  latex is now
stabilized and, as a result, different  batches,  recipes,  or  dilutions
can  be  mixed.   These mixing operations take place  in the blend tanks.
The  latex is  pumped  from the blend tank to the  coagulation  step  where
dilute  (pH  4-4.5) sulfuric acid and sodium chloride  solution are added.
The  acid  brine mixture  is called the coagulation liquor and  causes  the
rubber to precipitate  from the latex.   Theoretically, precipitation will
occur  with   a  coagulation  liquor  consisting  of   any  combination of
electrolyte  and dilute  acid.  However,  the quality  and intended end  use
of   the   rubber limit the choice of coagulants.  For  example, some types
of  "hot"  SBR which are  used as insulation covering  on  electrical  wire
are  coagulated   with   an  acid-polyamine solution  in order to produce  a
rubber with  low electrical conductivity.
                                 29

-------
 As mentioned earlier, rubber can be extended to improve  its  properties
 by  usxng  oils  and carbon black.  Carbon black and oil can be added to
 the latex during the coagulation step to produce a more intimate mixture
 than can be obtained by the subsequent addition of  these  materials  to
 the  crumb  rubber  as is the case with conventional rubber compounding.
 Wastewaters generated subsequent to the masterbatch operation  (addition
 of  carbon  black)   are  usually  black  due  to  colloidal carbon black
 particles.  The oil is added as an aqueous emulsion, and carbon black is
 blended into the latex as an aqueous slurry (approximately 5 percent  by
 weight).   There  are various types of extending oils;  some are staining
 and others non-staining Rubber extended with non-staining oil  will  not
 mark  surfaces and is required for some non-tire uses,   if a non-stained
 rubber is to be produced,  not  only  must  the  extender  oil  be  non-
 staining,  but also lighter-colored soaps, short stops,  and antioxidants
 must be used.

 The coagulated crumb is separated  from  the  coagulation'  liquor  on  a
 shaker  screen.   The  coagulation liquor is recycled after make-up with
 fresh acid and brine and blowdown of part of the  diluted  liquor.    The
 screened  crumb is  resuspended and washed with water in  a reslurry tank.
 This^operation serves to remove extraneous compounds from  the  rubber,
 particularly  residual  coagulation  liquor.   The crumb  rubber slurry is
 then dewatered, generally using a vacuum filter, and the  filtrate  wash
 water is recycled to the reslurry tank for reuse with fresh water makeup
 and as an overflow.   The overflow is necessary to blowdown accummulating
 rubber  solids  and  contaminants.    The coagulation liquor blowdown and
 crumb slurry water  overflows   are  usually  passed  through  separators.
 These  facilities,  called crumb pits,  are generally outside the process-
 ing building and trap the floatable crumb rubber.   The clarified   under-
 flow is discharged  to the main treatment facility.

 The  rinsed and filtered rubber crumb is finally dried with hot air  in a
 continuous belt or  screen dryer.   After drying,  the  rubber  is  weighed
 and  pressed  in bales   and   stored prior to  shipment.   Normally rubber
 bales weigh 75 pounds and are  wrapped in polyethylene film.   The  balers
 are  operated   hydraulically   with  oil or water as the  hydraulic fluid.
 Due to the  jarring baling act.lon  and the high  hydraulic  pressures, fluid
 leaks are frequent  and,  in the case of oil-driven balers,  the leaked oil
 should be prevented  from entering the  plant drain system.

 In  addition to the processing  operations described  above,   other  opera-
 tions  are   carried   out regularly,  though not necessarily  continuously,
 which generate  considerable quantities  of  waste  water.    These   include
 equipment  cleanout   and  area washdown operations.   Principal  equipment
 cleanouts include the  polymerization reactors, blowdown  tanks,  butadiene
 flash  tanks, styrene  stripping columns,  and latex blend  tanks.  In   most
 cases,  high volumes  of waste water  are produced that are laden with un-
 coagulated  latex  solids  and  are  characterized  by   a  milky   white
 appearance.  When the  flash tanks and  stripping columns  are cleaned, the
waste  waters contain  rubber solids, due to premature coagulation of the
 latex, in addition to  uncoagulated latex.  Area washdowns are   frequent,
and  the  wash  waters  pick up primarily  latex, rubber  solids, and oil.
The carbon black slurrying area is generally  contaminated  with  carbon
                                 30

-------
powder.   Area washdowns and storm run off typically pick up the carbon,
resulting in a fine carbon suspension.

It is opportune at this  point  to  review  the  potential  waste  water
sources  in  a typical emulsion plant.  Table 5 summarizes the principal
wastewaters and the nature or appearance of their constituents,

Solution Crumb Production

As pointed out earlier, solution polymerization is a newer, less  tradi-
tional process for the commercial production of crumb rubber in the U.S.
Solution   polymerization  systems  permit  the  use  of  stereospecific
catalysts of the Ziegler-Natta or alkyl-lithium types which have made it
possible to polymerize monomers, such as isoprene  or  butadiene,  in  a
suitable  organic  solvent  so  as to obtain the cis structure  (up to 98
percent) characteristic of the natural rubber molecule and with  a  high
degree  of regularity.  Rubbers with the cis structure are desired since
they are usually rubbery, whereas the trans-configuration is more  rigid
and  similar  to  plastics.   Cis-polybutadiene, for example, has higher
abrasion resistance than the usual SBR type and is being used mainly  to
extend  and  partially  replace  both  SBR  and natural rubber in tires.
Reports indicate that tread wear is improved by up to 35  percent  in  a
50-50 blend of polybutadiene and SBR.

A  relative newcomer on the rubber scene is based on the cheap monomers,
ethylene and propylene.  Although not stereo-regular, these polymers can
be produced in solution plants  and  can  use  similar  catalysts.   The
polymer  chain,  based  on  ethylene  and  propylene,  does  not contain
sufficient unsaturation for conventional curing.  The incorporation of a
third monomer, usually a diene  (thus EPDM  -  ethylene  propylene  diene
monomer), adds unsaturation and facilitates conventional curing.

The production of synthetic rubbers by solution polymerization processes
is  a  stepwise operation, and, in many aspects, is very similar to pro-
duction by emulsion polymerization.  There are distinct  differences  in
the   two  technologies,  however.   For  solution  polymerization,  the
monomers must be extremely pure and the solvent  (hexane,  for  example)
should be completely anhydrous.  In contrast to emulsion polymerization,
where  the  monomer  conversion  is  taken  to approximately 60 percent,
solution polymerization systems are  polymerized  to  conversion  levels
which  are  typically  in  excess  of  90  percent.   The polymerization
reaction is also more rapid, usually complete in one to two hours.

Figure H is a generalized materials flow diagram for the  production  of
crumb  SBR  by  a solution polymerization process.  The processing steps
shown are essentially typical of all solution polymerization  processes.
As  in  the  case with emulsion plants, solution plants comprise several
processing lines where different types of rubber for distinct  end  uses
can  be produced  (including non-extended, oil-extended, and carbon black
master batch varieties).  Plant operation is typically 24 hours per day,
365 days per year.
                                  31

-------
to
>.
u
0)
4->
X








E CO
2 .5
H- in
.
"o
-0 CL.
V
4-> C
ID O
U in
O —
in 3
< LU
1
in (D
in •—
U
O c
«— O
u— •—
4-J
~- O
ID 3
•— TJ
c £
0) (X
4-J
£ «
. -Q
It- -Q
O 13
OC
h
LU
in
4-1
c
CD
c
•~
E
CD
4->
0
0
>_
x

c
CD
CD
31
CL
CO
1











O
«—
•M
=1
^—
0
in

O
in
CO
0)
u
u
3
O
CO
o
4-J
c
0>
Q.
CO








0)
(D
1-
o
V4-
V
cn
ow avera
^^


























•
in
o
•_
c
co
CO
!_
O
0)
^
CD
CO
CL
(U
in
TJ
CO
issolved
o














J_
(U
CO
^~
s_
CU
4-J
CO
4-J
C
CD
O
0>
Q
13
C
CD
TJ
<0
~O
C
0)
0.
in
3
in

*
in
O

c
CD
CO
!_
0
TJ
0)
"o
in
in
TJ
4-1
T>
"*








|
14.

 <4-
T> O
c

jz c
CO CD
JC cr
•0 JZ
c cn
CD —
n:
n
in
. O •
— in
C T>
CD —
cn —
i- 0
O in
issolved
issolved
Q TJ






.
0}
4->
CD

d>
in
c

1_

4-J
o
c
s
o
u
0)
o.
D.

4-J
CO












5
4-1
CO
TJ
0)
4->
CO
3

























TJ •
(1) X
> 0)
•— 4->
O CD
,in . —
in
— TJ
TJ —
CD 3
CO
TJ CD
D> O
T) O
C C
CU 3
Q.
in 4-
3 O
in
in
TJ 

in c
U ro
— 3
c cr
CD
cn jc
i- cn
O —
issolved
Dlids. 1
o in












i_
0)
4J
CO

(1)
in
c
^_
^
O
c
CD
0>
O
and suspen-

A
in
o

c
CO
cn
i_
O •
in
CD TJ
ja —
co O
L- m
co
D-TI
(U cu
in >
TJ "o
c in
co in
issolved
3d and d
Q -o

















in
|
-o
_c
cn
i

TJ
0)
        3 O
       CO
                       4-1

                       C
                       O
                       c

                       in
                       in
                       0>
                       O
                       o
 0)
J3
JOi
 3
 l_
 O
l/l

 CD
T3
 o
to
 in
 3
 to
O
 d)
 o
 o
3.
 cu
 o

1
                                                      c
                                                      o
 3
 cn
 CD
 O
o
                                                                  cn
 0)
o

-Q

 3
                        (U
                        Q.
                        Q.
                                           u
                                           CD
 in
 u
 O
4->
 O
 CD
 Q)
CC

T3
 C
 CD
                                                                                             C
                                                                                             CD
                                        in
                                        CD
                                        cu
                                                                      4-1
                                                                      C
                                                                      CD
                                                          32

-------
Q
111
N

ee.
UJ






2i
00

< <•»

£ o
Q
                                                       33

-------
 The fresh  monomers  are  pumped  to  the  plant  from  the  tank  farm.
 Inhibited_ monomers are passed through a caustic soda scrubber to remove
 the inhibitor.  The monomers are then sent to fractionator drying towers
 where extraneous water is removed.   Fresh  and  recycled  solvent  /for
 example,                                                            *

 hexane)   is  also passed through a drying column to remove water and ex-
 traneous light and heavy components.  The  light-  and  heavy-components
 build  up  in  the system as unwanted by-products or unrecovered monomer
 during the polymerization step and must be removed.  The  purified  sol-
 vent and monomers are then blended.  The mixture is generally termed the
 "mixed  feed".   The  mixed  feed  can  be further dried to remove final
 traces of water using a desiccant column.

 The dried mixed feed is  now  ready  for  the  polymerization  step  and
 catalysts  can  be  added  to the solution (solvent plus monomers).   The
 catalyst systems used vary.  Typically they  are  titanium  halide  plus
 aluminum  alkyl  combinations  or butyllithium compounds.   The catalysts
 can be added to the mixed feed just prior to  the polymerization stage or
 to the lead polymerization reactor.

 The blend of solution and catalysts is polymerized in a   series  of   re-
 actors.    The reaction is highly exothermic and heat is  removed continu^
 ously by either an ammonia refrigerant or  by   chilled brine  or  glycol
 solutions.    The  reactors  are  similar in both design  and operation to
 those used in emulsion polymerization.   The mixture leaves  the  reactor
 train as  a  rubber  cement,  i.e., polymeric rubber solids dissolved dn
 solvent.

 A  short   stop  solution  is  added  to  the  cement  after  the  desired
 conversion  is  reached.    The  stabilized cement  is   pumped to cement
 storage  tanks prior to  subsequent  processing.    At this  point other
 ingredients,  such as antioxidants,  can be  added,   if the rubber is to  be
 oil  extended,   oil  can   be   added to the  cement.  The  oil  is  usually
 blended  with the cement at some point  between the  storage  tanks and  the
 steam stripping operation.
                                       /
 The  rubber  cement  is  pumped  from  the  storage  tank to  the  coagulator
 where the rubber is precipitated into  crumb form with hot water under
 violent  agitation.   Wetting agents  (surfactants) can be  added  to  promote
 the  control   of crumb  size and to  prevent  reagglomeration.  in addition
 to  coagulation,  much of the solvent and  unreacted  monomer   are stripped
 overhead.   For  carbon black masterbatch  rubbers, the carbon black slurry
 is  added  to the coagulator  in much  the  same manner  as for  emulsion crumb
 rubber.

 The  resultant   crumb slurry passes to a series of  strippers where steam
 stripping drives  off  the remaining  monomers and solvent.   The   strippers
 are  generally   a   flash  tank  or agitated kettle strippers.  The steam,
 solvent, and monomer vapors are  condensed and sent  to a  decant   system.
The   bottom  decant  layer,  saturated  in  monomers  and  solvent,  is
discharged.  The organic layer  is sent  to  a  multi-stage  fractionator
 (described  earlier).   Light   fractions are removed in the first column
                                 34

-------
and  generally  consist  of  unreacted  light  monomer    (for   example,
butadiene).   This  is  normally  reclaimed at the monomer supply plant.
The second column  produces  purified  solvent,  a  heavy  monomer-water
fraction, and extraneous heavy components.

The heavy monomer  (for example, styrene)  is condensed, decanted, and re-
cycled.   The bottom water layer is discharged.  The purified solvent is
dried and reused.  The heavy extraneous  component  stream  is  a  waste
which  can either be decanted before disposal or can be incinerated as a
slop oil.

The stripped crumb slurry is separated and further washed with water  on
vibrating  screens.   The  slurry rinse water is recycled in part to the
coagulation stage with water or steam makeup.  The remaining portion  of
the slurry rinse water overflows and is discharged.  This water contains
floating  crumb rubber fines and is generally passed through a crumb pit
before discharge.  The crumb fines are trapped in the pit.  The screened
rubber is passed through an extruder-dryer for  .further  dewatering  and
drying.   Dewatering  and  drying  can also be carried out with a rotary
filter and hot air oven dryer.  The dried rubber  is  pressed  into  75-
pound  bales  and  is  usually  wrapped  in  polyethylene  for shipment.
Balers, identical to those employed in emulsion processing, are used  in
solutionpolymerized  rubber  production.    Oil  leaks  are  a  potential
problem.

In addition to the processing operations described above, area washdowns
occur.  These are frequent and produce  large  volumes  of  waste  water
which  can  be  contaminated with dissolved organics, floating organics,
oils, and suspended solids.  Since the majority of the processing  steps
are  operated  on  a  strict  water-free basis, there is little need for
equipment cleanout operations with water.  The  processing  units  which
are  kept  free  of  water  are cleaned out with solvent when necessary.
This cleaning solvent is stored separately and is used  solely  for  the
cleanout  operation.   Process  pumps,  handling in particular the dried
mixed feed prior to and during the  polymerization  stage,  use  a  non-
aqueous  fluid   (usually  an  oil)  as a seal in lieu of water to prevent
contamination of the process streams with water.   Leaking  fluid  is  a
potential  source of oil which can be picked up by area washdown waters.
The carbon black slurrying area is a source of waste waters  laden  with
carbon fines.

The  main waste water sources in a typical!solution polymerization plant
are summarized in Table 6.

Latex Production

In addition to solid crumb rubber,  emulsion polymerization is also  used
to  produce  latex rubber.  Latex production follows the same processing
steps  as  emulsion  crumb  production  with  the  exception  of   latex
coagulation  and  crumb rinsing, drying,  and baling.  Only about 5 to 10
percent of SBR is used as latex, but approximately  30  percent  of  the
nitrile rubbers  (NBR)  enter the market as latex.  Commercially available
SBR latexes contain about H5~ to 55-percent solids, although some can be
                                35

-------
 C
 (D



 0]
 4->
 C
 o
o
 i
 0)
4->
 tn
 .
4\J
• -M
C
•—
r—
CO
^
1—
03

•«
I*
Q.

-C
cn

n:













»—
O
tn
tn

Q

•
in
0

c
to
CO
IM
O
10

_a
ID
l_
(D
Q.
0)
tn

73
c
(D

•a
0)
>
»—
o
in
in

a
and dissolved
73
 •
— tn
O 73
tn —
in —
— 0
Q tn
73
o
73
C
Q.
I/I
tn
73
to
n
in
U

c
(D
cn
l~
0
(U

o •
ID in
1- 73
to —
Q.—
(U O
tn tn

"O 73
C 0)
ro >

73 "o
(U in
> tn
••— •_
O 73
tn
tn 73
•— C
o to
C
0

4-1
3
p«.
0
in

O
•_-
4^
tn
3
to
U

4-1
C

O

^

-------
as  high  as  68 percent.  Most NBR latexes are in the 45- to 55-percent
solids class.  The polymerizations are taken essentially  to  completion
(about  98 to 99 percent conversion) as opposed to emulsion crumb rubber
production where conversion per polymerization pass is approximately  60
percent.

As  a result, the recovery of unused monomer is not economical.  Process
economics are directed towards  maximum  conversion  on  a  once-through
basis.

Figure  5  is a generalized materials flow diagram for the production of
latex SBR by emulsion polymerization.  The steps shown  are  typical  of
all  latex  production  processes.   Although latex plants are generally
operated 24 hours per day and 365 days per year, the production runs for
each recipe or type of latex are shorter than in  emulsion  or  solution
crumb  rubber plants because latex consumption is on a smaller scale and
latex consumers are  usually  outside  companies  with  varying  product
needs.   By  contrast,  the  majority  of  crumb rubber is made for tire
manufacture, is consumed by major tire companies,  and  is  produced  by
their  own synthetic rubber producing divisions.  This has the effect of
limiting the number  of  types  of  product. and  recipe,  rationalizing
production  schedules,  and,  in  the  final  analysis,  leading to long
production runs.  Latexes are used to manufacture  dipped  goods,  paper
coatings, paints, carpet backing, and many other commodities.

The  monomers  are  piped  from  the  tank farm to the processing plant.
Monomer inhibitors are scrubbed out  by  using  caustic  soda  solution.
Soap solution, catalysts, and modifiers are added to the monomer to pro-
duce  a  feed emulsion prior to feeding to the reactors.  The water used
in the preparation of the above solutions is generally deionized city or
well water.  The number of reactors in  the  reactor  train  is  usually
smaller  than  that used for emulsion crumb production.  The temperature
is generally kept at approximately  40  to  45»o«F  and,  therefore,  most
latexes are made by the "cold" process.  When the polymerization is com-
plete,  the latex is sent to a blowdown tank for intermediate storage or
holding.  Stabilizers are usually added to the latex at  this  point  to
stop the polymerization and to stabilize the latex.

The  latex passes from the blowdown tanks to a vacuum stripper where the
unreacted butadiene is removed.  The butadiene is vented to  the  atmos-
phere.   The  vacuum  is  pulled with either a vacuum pump or steam jet.
The excess styrene is stripped from the latex in a steam stripper.   The
steam and styrene are condensed and sent to a receiver.  The bottom
water  layer  is  decanted off and discharged.  The styrene layer is not
recycled but can be containerized and sent to disposal.

The stripped latex is passed through a series of screen filters  to  re-
move  unwanted  large  rubber  solids.   The  latex is finally stored in
blending tanks where various additives (for example,  antioxidants)   are
                                 37

-------
                       _

                       D
                       i
                       §
                       B£
                       0.
Z
O
                       S
                       Df
                       oi
                       UJ
                       Z
                       UJ
                       O
                                                                             38

-------
mixed  with  -the latex.  The latex is shipped from the blending tanks by
tank car or tank truck, or is drummed ready for dispatch.

Since short production runs are common to the industry, the major waste-
waters generated in a synthetic latex plant stem from equipment cleanout
operations.  When production is switched from one type of rubber to  an-
other, reactors, blowdown tanks, strippers, and filters require cleaning

for  the  new  product.  In addition, tank cars and tank trucks owned or
leased by the plant require cleaning after each  trip.   Area  washdowns
are frequent inside the processing building's and at the vehicle loading-
unloading  areas.   All  the  above  waste  waters  will  contain  oils,
dissolved organics, and high concentrations of latex solids.
                                                              wastewater
Table 7 summarizes the origins and nature of  the  principal
sources generated in a typical synthetic latex plant.

Summary

The  growth  of the tire and inner tube industry has been closely linked
to the growth of the automobile industry.  Current  production  is  over,
210  million tires per year with one quarter of this production destined
for original equipment on new vehicles.  The production  of  both  tires
and  inner tubes consist of the compounding, extruding, calendering, and
molding of solid raw materials.  There is considerable heat generated by
these processes and it must be dissipated arid controlled to  insure  the
quality  of  the final product.  Water used in other than for utilities,
consists of makeup water for soapstone solution and latex dip solutions.

The production capacity and output of* the synthetic rubber industry  are
expanding  steadily  and  are  linked very closely to consumption by the
tire industry.  The relative production levels for the various types  of
synthetic  rubber  will  not  change significantly over the next several
years to affect the operations or waste water impact of the industry  as
a  whole.   Two distinct processing technologies (emulsion and solution)
exist.  Process variations within each of  these  two  technologies  are
only  minor.   Two  different  types of rubber product are manufactured:
crumb  and  latex  rubbers.  "The  so-called  .specialty   rubbers   are
manufactured by processes similar to those used to produce the so-called
tire  rubbers  and  are  in similar product forms, i.e., solid and latex
rubbers.                       ,          •
                               39

-------
E
g
M-
Ol
in c

ro
^

<4-
0

u
u
3
4-J
ro
•^
ty, and color. Extremely
•«
c

r—
ro
j^
P_
ro

M
a:
Q.
.c
01
•..
T"

to
ro
u

2
o
r—
lf_

CD
Ol
ro


ro
i—

s, suspended and dissolved
o

c
ro
O)
!_
o

T3
<1>

^_
o
in
in
•—
r~*

ntities of uncoagulated
ro
3


_C
Ol
•_
3:


•
tn
T3
r—
O
tn













.
$
4->
ro
T—

1
3
tn
t>
c
ro
in
o
ro •
01 in
i- -0
O —
0) "o
•— in
ro 13
L. 0)
ro >
Q.—
(D O
in in
tn
-a .-
C T3
ro
TJ
T3 C
a) ro
^
*«- "O
o ^
t.
ro
E
3
to






















£
o
in
"3
J

ro

>

c
o

4J
O
3
T3
e
D-

X
V
4J
ro
_j

























c
0
+J
3
"o
in

O

4-1
in
3
ro
o
0)
0
3
0
to

4-1
C
CD
D.
to









L_
CD
o
-Q
3
L-
4J
• —
C


0
c

in
in
CD
O
o

Q-
O
to

ro
-a
o
to

u
•..
4J
in
3
ro
o



' 0)

ro
i~«

u
CD
4-1
ro
3

4-J
C
ro
0

o






01
c
•— .
D.
Q.
•..
J-
4J
CO

i_
CD
E
O
C
o
s:

in
in
CD
O

LLJ


CD
ro
3

CD
in
c
...
i_

4-1
3
O
c
ro
CD

o




.t
Q-
U
4J
to

-a
c
ro

^
in
i-
O
4J
O
ro
0)
a:

M
tn
*s
C
ro
1—













































tn
i_
CD
Q-
             i
             CD
             in
             O

             ro
             CD
             o
             3
             C
             ro
             c
             ro
             ro
             o
                           tn
                           ro
                           a)
                          4J
                          c
                          ro
40

-------
                               SECTION IV

                        INDUSTRY CATEGORIZATION
Introduction

Industry categories and subcategories were established so as  to  define
those sectors of the rubber industry where separate effluent limitations
and  standards should apply.  In the final analysis, the underlying dis-
tinctions between the various categories  and  subcategories  have  been
based  on  the waste water generated, its quantity, characteristics, and
applicability of control  and  treatment.   The  factors  considered  in
determining   whether   such  categorizations  are  justified  were  the
following:

    1.   Manufacturing Process.
    2.   Product.
    3.   Raw Materials.
    4.   Plant Size.
    5.   Plant Age.
    6.   Plant Location.                 '•
    7.   Air Pollution Control Equipment.
    8.   Nature of Wastes Generated.
    9.   Treatability of Wastewaters.

As indicated in Section III, there are inherent differences between  the
tire  and  inner  tube  sector,  and  the synthetic rubber sector of the
rubber industry; therefore, the two have been separated to  produce  the
two principal industry categorizations.

Tire and Inner Tube Industry

Manufacturing Process

The  process  steps  by  which tires are made are similar throughout the
industry.  Although there are variations due to  equipment  manufacturer
and  automation, these differences do not lead to significant variations
in the volume or constituents of process waters.

Product

Examination of existing plants indicates that the end product is  not  a
reasonable  basis  for categorization.  Manufacturing steps for all tire
production are similar; inner tube manufacture,  although  different  in
some respects, generates the same type of process waste water streams as
does  the  tire production.  The characteristics of the waste stream and
the potential treatment technologies are not significantly different.

Radial tire manufacture is  different  in  the  building,  molding,  and
curing  operations;  however,  these  differences  do  not significantly
impact on waste water quantity or quality.  In  addition,  radial  tires
are generally produced in the same plants as bias tires.
                                 41

-------
Raw Materials

Since the basic raw materials for the entire industry are rubber, carbon
black  and  oil,  categorization based on raw material usage is not rea-
sonable.  The quantities and form of the  different  raw  materials  re-
ceived  varies,  but  these  do  not significantly affect the control or
treatment technologies applicable to the industry.  The handling of  raw
materials,  particularly the carbon black, also varies within the indus-
try.  However, this again does not affect the process  waste  waters  or
their treatability.

P_lantTSize

A  listing of most plants currently operating and their production rates
is given in Table 8.  The distribution of these is presented  in  Figure
6.   Prom  inspection  of  existing and plant visit data, it was learned
that  plant  size  has  not  significant  effect  on  the   quality   or
treatability of waste waters.  Process effluent quantities varied signi-
ficantly  but was not directly related to plant size.  The orily signifi-
cance of size is the cost of treatment of waste water streams, which, of
course, is related to other factors.
The age of plants currently in operation  will  fall  into  three  basic
categories  depending  on  the  expansion,  period in which the plant was
built.  The oldest plant in operation is an inner tube facility built in
1888.

As constructed, production facilities built during the first two  expan-
sion  periods  tend  to  be multi- storied, with process lines located on
many floors and confined to small areas.  In addition, plants  from  the
first  expansion  period  most  probably have undergone modifications in
order to update their machine processing technology   (for  example,  the
installation  of  internal mixers) .  Most likely this would further con-
gest the processing area.  Much of the equipment in these  older  plants
is old and of designs that have since been updated to reduce maintenance
and  operational  costs.   Process,  nonprocess, and domestic wastewater
sewers exist as a  combined  sewer,  thus  making  process  contaminants
difficult  to locate or treat once thy reach the drainage system.  Engi-
neering diagrams of sewers within the plant are dated and possibly  non-
existent.   Drains  that  do  exist were located for ease of washdown of
contaminants, thus making their position inappropriate by current think-
ing and standards.

The newer plants of the last expansion period have the benefit of modern
design  criteria  and  updated,  thinking  in  both  the   sanitary   and
maintenance  engineering fields.  Buildings are single-story and contain
more area per process line.  Equipment  and  area  locations  have  been
designed  for a cleaner, more maintenance- free operation.,  Sewers are no
longer combined, thus making process sewer waste waters easier to locate
and treat.  Drains are not located in areas where contaminants can  gain
easy entrance.
                                  42

-------
>
•o
^
in
4->
C
ID


0
O
o
vO



0
o
o
CO
1 —
*

oooooooooooooo
oooooooooooooo
unooooin— ooor~.ooo
— cr\ •— oocno.cf-d'-d'O-rfo uvo
— CM ft — CM — J- on — on — on


o
o
o
_-).
• —


o
o
un
CM
1 —


o
o
un
f>



0
o
o
vO



o
o
i--.
j.



o
o
o
0



o
o
o
O~t
CM


un o o o
-d- o o o
r-~ o unun
o\ o vo on
on on — —



























CO
03
jf^
ro
1—


























1 States
^
4-1
C


w
-C
4->

C
•—

in
03
"—
4-*
'o
ID
U-
O
4-1
> U
-o
E
D_
03
P
L_
o
'n?




ID
03 O
4-1
ro c
E 0
'x +j
O U
1- 3
o_ u_
O. 4->
c
o
o





c
o
4->
ro
u
°




>
c
ro
a


o



>
ro
TJ
in
c
Z3



ID
4-*
ro
03 a
4J
• ro c
E 0
'x +»
0,0
CL J-
Q.4J
<; in
C
o
o











o
o
A
O
1.



-C
o

!_
TJ
O
O
CD






O
O
O
O
CM







5
Oi



^r


CO px. LTV
CM f*\^j'
o*\ o*\ o*\




^£
T3 0 — 1
C <
KM H
tn «.
** O 03
0) — in
c « < o
nTc10-"
3 < - ro
in o
4-" o ro 3
u 	 1 o I—

















o o o
O O'O
o vo un
o -* on
i — i — i —







— oo o
vo on CM
O"\ C"\ O^t






1








o
Ic
o
§
^
<



J_
ro
03
^
•o
o
o
CD
















1
I






i i— vo on i
1 CM VO VD 1
I O^ O\ O^ 1




^^
o. a
•s: —
c < —
0) »> — — 1
H -a <
o c - •>
o ro 03 4-1 •>
j; — »— »- c
o i- — o 03
£ 03 — o.-a
in J3 > 03 in
o 3 ro u ro
o o o u. ID

















o o
0 O
o un
on —
• — • —







un i i
J- i i
O*l 1 1
«_ i |


_
s:


^. r*^ un i oo vo o^\
m CM j- i vo -d- un




> - —
— ii x 4-> T> s:
"03 H- — —
C D) •> O 03 »
O c ro - •- o
in < ^ i- c 14- —
^ 03 03 O in 03
O m o_ ^™ •— c Q.
ro o O >*sc ro ;;.3
-5 -I h- I- •= Z 1-



T3

"«

14.
C
ro
s






i O O O
o o o
o o un
t — I--.OO
CM —







1 O »— • OO i —
1 CM — VO CM
1 OA CT\ CTt O"t

,

O


^- 1 I vo
IA 1 1 LTV
O"\ 1 1 O\




f
•2£
<_
^C ^C
< o >
a. — -
.c • ro
» o 3 c
ro 03
ro c E "03
"O S- —
c ^ ro •



^
i
ro _M
03 3
. L. ID
O jC
0 O .
S S






O O O O O 0 O
un o o o o o o
^ o o un o o
o CM CM. unco o
CM CM CM — CM on







un un on un i i >~.


,__
— <


i
i
i
t





a
S

E1
"ro
CO



4J

3
C
03
.n
o
CO






o
o
un
in








i
•i





un vo -zl* ^-" -d~
vo o ^t* on vo
O^ O\CO O^\ CTt


O
4-1
O
03
O
L.
Q_


^
ro
v
c
ID
E
c
.O
!_
•~
C
UJ

CO
Z3
-

j_r
c
E
03
cn
ro
1

03
in
S
-o
,
Q
C/)
O X
- < — o
in o S
03
C
o
._
4J
ro
o
o
_j
c « •> c
•- - TJ in o)
O i— • (33 ' ^
s: o JT ro
<4- o a:
in c 4-"
, CD fo ro •
Q -C Z 3
D)
C
>J
C
ro



u
O
u
4-1
in


<
o.
««
03

I/)
•^
^_
U
ro
0

03

tn

*—
i_
ro
o
o

•S
>*
03

•5
C

LL.



u
03
a.


u
„
ro
c
ro
-^
t_
ro
X
03
1-









^
n
ro
OC

-a
c
ro

CD

>.
O
1_
3
TJ
L,
O
o
.n
o

•V
c
a)
i_
L.
ro
3



c
ro
E
c
03
a
'Z.

*>
o

ro
14-
M-
3
CQ



Q.
O

C
3

O
j:
o

A
C
o
L.

<
03
C
O
4J
in

t
,_
LL.
       -c           <        <
       o   « o  •	«    o-
          .c —  —     w  uu     O     . i. .-  c  3 •'—  c  — 4J  ro
    c 03 E  O4J o=C-c me
    rrojao4Jro2i     0.4-1 —
    ^i-O>-OintnE4-ii—
	^- ro *-~  ro  03 0  o  03 o  ro
<
                                                                      > j:
                                                                      c  in
                                                                      03  ID
                                                                     O Z
                                                                      ID
                                                                     13
 o  o    .x
IE IE  oT   " ^
O O  4-> TJ X

  -  - o "03
 c  c  •— —   •>
 o  ro  i. M-  o
 i-  >. ro  >. o
j«  i-  -c  ro  ro
< m  o z 3
                                                                                03

                                                                                03
                                                                                                    03
                                                                                                    tn

                                                                                                    I
.3'
 .a
  8

  o
 to
                                     43

-------
By  the   above   reasoning,   the   process  waste  water  streams  from  older
plants should be larger in  volume and should  contain higher  loadings  of
both  oily   and  solid   materials.   Control and  treatment  should  be more
difficult.   Examination of  plant  waste water streams  from  all  these
areas bears  this out.

The  years   between   1950 and  1960  are the transition  period between the
second and third expansion  period.    Plants   constructed  in  the  early
1950 «s  were built   during the Korean War and will most likely have the
same problems as those  built in the World War II  era.    Pew   (if  any)
plants  were built   after   the   Korean War until  1959,  when the  current
expansion began.  The year  1959,  therefore,   is  the   demarcation  point
between old  and new facilities for  purposes of economic  analysis.

£lan;b Location

Prom  inspection and   waste water  sampling of plants  located in  three
geographical areas of the country and from analysis  of  existing  data^
plant  location  will   have no effect on the quality  or quantity of the
process waste water streams.   These  geographical  areas  included the
South,  the   Par West,  and the Northern Midwest.  Geographical location
has a significant effect on the supply of water;  therefore,   management
of nonprocess streams such  as cooling water and  steam  varied from region
to  region.   Recirculation of   cooling water is very common  in  the Par
West (where  water supplies  are short),  whereas   it  is   less  common  in
other  sections of the  country.   Reduction of nonprocess waste waters by
recycle increases the treatability  of process waste waters when combined
with nonprocess waste   waters  in  an  end-of-pipe  treatment  facility.
Treatability   of  process  waste  water  streams,   however,  is  more
effectively  carried out before combination with  nonprocess streams.   In
addition,  geography does not limit the use of recirculated  water to the
Far West.  Plants in other  parts  of the country  are also using recycle,
though not necessarily  for  the same reasons.  Therefore, location is not
a reasonable  basis for  subcategorization.
Air Pollution Control Equipment

The  type  of  air pollution equipment employed by a facility can have a
great effect on the characteristics  and  treatability  of  the  process
waste  water streams.  The use of dry equipment or the recycling of dis-
charges from wet equipment was observed in all areas of the plant  which
are  currently  served by such devices.  Therefore, since company policy
(rather than the situation to be controlled)  dictates the type of equip-
ment used, air pollution equipment does not form a  suitable  basis  for
categorization.

Mature of Wastes Generated

From  evaluation  of all available data, the type of wastes generated by
all facilities in the tire and inner tube  industry  are  similar.   The
addition  or subtraction of the latex dipping of fabric from the process
line can  affect  the  characteristics  of  the  process  waste  waters.
                                 44

-------
However,  as supported by existing data, this discharge is not large and
can be easily contained.  Therefore, it does not necessarily affect  the
treatability  of  process  waste  waters  and  does not form a basis for
categorization.

Treatabilitv of Wastewaters

The treatment technologies employed by companies throughout the industry
are similar.  Wastewater constituents are also very similar:  mainly oil
and solids.  Treatability is more a factor of specific plant layout than
of the specific pollutant and, therefore, does  not  form  a  basis  for
categorization.

Summary,

For   the   purpose  of  establishing  effluent  'limitations,  only  one
subcategory is necessary for the tire and inner tube industry.  The  age
of  tire  and  inner tube plants, however, must be considered during the
analysis of the costs to implement the control technologies  upon  which
the  limitations  are  based.   The  difference  in cost for old and new
plants have been delineated in Section VIII.


As indicated, tire manufacturing facilities built  in  earlier  periods,,
although  using  similar  manufacturing  techniques",  of-fceh have greater
waste water problems than do new plants.  Plants .built prior .to 1959 are
considered old; those built during and afte'r 1959  &re  considered  new.
Inner tube facilities, although producing a different product, incur the
same  difficulties  and  for  the purpose of economic analysis should be
grouped with the" "old" tire plants.

In considering the economic impact on the industry, camelback operation,
a small segment of the industry, should also be  included in the "old" or
"new" group of tire plants depending on the tire facility of which it is
a part.  Likewise, compounding operations, another small segment of  the
industry,  should  fall into the age group of the plants with which they
coexist.  If located by itself in a separate location,  the  compounding
facility should be grouped with the "old" or "new" tire plants depending
on its original date of operation.


Synthetic Rubber Industry                                      • _  ••

Manufacturing  Process

As  described  in Section III of this document,  there are two basic pro-
cessing techniques in common use in the industry to  produce  synthetic
rubber:    emulsion polymerization processing and solution polymerization
processing.

Emulsion polymerization as a commercial process  dates back to world  War
II.   No   significant  changes have been made in the basic process since
the first  emulsion polymerization plants were built.  Emulsion polymeri-
                                  45

-------
 zation processing is used,  however,  -to  make  both  emulsion  crumb  and
 latex  rubber.    From  both  operational and waste water points of view,
 crumb and latex production  techniques should be considered separately.

 Solution polymerization production facilities are different  from  emul-
 sion  plants  from  both process and waste water points of view and have
 been considered as a separate subcategory.   Differences  among  solution
 rubber production plants are minor.   All solution plants consist of feed
 preparation,  polymerization, solvent and monomer recovery,  coagulation,
 and rubber finishing operations.  The operations that have the  greatest
 waste  water  impact  in solution plants are those operations which are
 most similar plant to plant.

 It   was  therefore  concluded   that   there   are   essentially   three
 manufacturing  process  variations  which  merit separate subcategories:
 emulsion polymerization to   crumb  rubber;   solution  polymerization to
 crumb rubber;  and emulsion  polymerization to latex.

 Product

 There  are  two  principal  product subcategories in the synthetic rubber
 industry,  crumb and latex product.

 Within the crumb subcategory  there are several product variations  which
 involved  the type of rubber  (styrene-butadiene,  or polybutadiene,  etc.)
 and whether the rubber is extended or not.   The two  principal   products
 made by emulsion polymerization  are  SBR and nitrile rubber.  The process
 operations  for  the  two rubbers  are identical,  and the same or similar
 equipment  is used.   Several types  of rubber  are  produced   by   solution
 polymerization   processes;  in   many cases  similar solvents  and monomers
are  used,  equivalent  processing  operations
identical processing equipment is used.
are  carried  out,   and
The  processing  variations  involved  in the manufacture of either oil-
extended or carbon-black-extended rubber are minor.   in  addition,  the
oil  and carbon black are very effectively tied up with the rubber, thus
reducing the potential for waste water impact.

The effects that the various types of latex rubber (for example, SBR and
NBR) have on the production operations and waste waters are minor.   The
same equipment and processes are used for all types.

As ^pointed  out  in  Section III, the specialty rubbers are essentially
similar to the tire rubbers from a processing  point  of  view,  and  no
separate categorization is deemed necessary.

It  has been concluded that only two principal product subcategories are
required to adequately define the synthetic rubber industry.   They  are
crumb and latex rubber.

Raw Materials
                                  46

-------
The  monomeric  raw  materials used to produce the various types of syn-
thetic have similar properties.  They are usually unsaturated  hydrocar-
bons with extremely low solubility in water.  Chloroprene, a chlorinated
hydrocarbon  used  to  make neoprene rubber, is also insoluble in water.
In addition to low solubility, most  of  the  monomers  used  have  high
volatility  and,  consequently,  a  monomer floating on waste water soon
evaporates.  Most solvents  used  also  have  low  solubility  and  high
volatility  and  do  not  remain  in  ,a  waste  water.   The  catalysts,
modifiers, antioxidants, etc.  used  in  polymerizations  are  generally
similar  and  are  used  in such low concentrations that their effect on
waste water is minimal.  Their presence is generally undetectable in the
waste waters.

In conclusion, there is no need for a subcategorization based on the raw
materials used.                                             ,    •

Plant Size

Most emulsion and solution crumb rubber plants consist of  several  par-
allel and integral processing lines.  Each of these lines tends to be of
similar  size.   The  waste  waters generated by a plant, therefore, are
normally directly proportional to the production capacity.

Small production facilities  (for example, latex  plants),  will  bear   a
somewhat  higher  treatment  cost  than, larger  plants.  However, these
plants are generally part  of  a  larger  synthetic  rubber  or  organic
chemical  complex,  and  the treatment cost can be shared.  In any case,
latex plants are considered as a separate subcategory.
For these reasons, sub-categorization according to
necessary.

Plant Age                                         ,
       plant  size  is  not
Many   emulsion   plants   (crumb   and   latex  rubber) were built  during  or
shortly  after World War  II.  Few have been built   since.    In   addition,
technology has not changed appreciably  since that  time.

Solution plants  are,generally newer,  but  all have  been built in the  last
13  years.   The technology  has not changed radically during  that  time
period.
 It has  been concluded  that plant age  is  not
 separate subcategorization.

 Plant Location
a  significant  factor  for
 Most of the larger synthetic  rubber plants  are  located in one geographic
 region.   (Refer  to  Figure   6.)   This fact is closely connected to the
 availability of the monomeric raw materials.  The location of the plants
 does  not  influence  the  processing  operation.   However,   geographic
 location   can   influence   the  performance  of  aerated  lagoons   and
 stabilization ponds.  Comparable secondary  waste water treatment  alter-
                                  47

-------
CO

LU
OS
=>
CO
   0<
   CS uJ
   58
   UJ Q
   Ooi
   z*:
   da.
   oTO =>
   Z.\U >-

   ^ eO oi"

   U ^ UJ
   iu to
   U^ <

   -J Z) E
                                       48

-------
natives,  such as activated sludge, do exist, but the performance is not
dependent on geographic location.  It is not necessary to  subcategorize
the synethtic rubber industry by plant location.

Air Pollution Control Equipment

Generally,  air pollution control devices are not required by the indus-
try.  Odor problems do exist at some plants, but these are controlled by
devices which are either dry or which do not impact on  the  wastewaters
of the plant.
Air  pollution  control  is
synthetic rubber industry.

Nature of Wastes Generated
not  a subject for subcategorization of the
The differences in the characteristics  of  waste  waters  generated  by
production  of  non-extended,  oil-extended,  and  carbon-black-extended
emulsion crumb rubber were not discernible.  Similarly, the waste  water
characteristics produced by non-extended, oil-extended, and carbonblack-
extended  solution  crumb  plants  were  essentially identical; however,
waste waters from emulsion  crumb,  solution  crumb,  and  latex  rubber
production   facilities   were   significantly   different   to  warrant
subcategorization.                                  -

These facts indicate the separate subcategories are  required  only  for
emulsion crumb, solution crumb, and latex rubber production.

Treatabilitv of Wastewaters

Since  the waste waters generated by emulsion crumb and latex production
require chemical coagulation prior to primary clarification whereas  the
waste  waters  produced by solution crumb plants do not, there is a dif-
ference in the treatability of synthetic rubber  wastes.   In  addition,
the  COD  and  BOD loading from latex plants is considerably higher than
from emulsion and solution crumb plants,  and  requires  more  extensive
treatment.

It  was  concluded  that, based on the  treatability of the waste waters,
three subcategories were required:  emulsion crumb, solution crumb,  and
latex rubber production.

Summary

For  the  purpose  of  establishing  effluent limitations guidelines and
standards, the synthetic rubber industry should be separated into  three
subcategories  which   are  based on distinct processing and product dif-
ferences.  These subcategories are:

     1.   Emulsion crumb rubber.
     2.   Solution crumb rubber.
     3.   Latex rubber.
                                  49

-------

-------
                               SECTION V

                         WASTE CHARACTERIZATION
Tire and Inner Tube Industry

A general process flow diagram for a typical tire production facility is
presented  in  Figure  1.   Figure  2  presents  a  typical  inner  tube
production process diagram.

The  primary  water  usage in a tire and inner tube facility is for non-
contact  cooling  and  heating.   Discharges  from   service   utilities
supplying  cooling  water and steam are the major source of contaminants
in the final effluent.  Characteristics of these waste waters  are  COD,
BOD, suspended solids, and dissolved solids.

Table  9  presents  the  raw  waste loading for the combined process and
recirculating cooling water,  nonprocess  waste  waters  of  the  plants
visited.   Flow  variations  are  due  mainly to the use of once-through
cooling water in certain plants as opposed to recirculated cooling water
in others.  In order to adequately estimate the  waste  water  discharge
flow rates, the plant effluent was divided into process waste waters and
nonprocess  waste waters.  The process waste waters consist of mill area
oily waters, soapstone  slurry  and  latex  dip  wastes,  area  washdown
waters,  emission  scrubber  waters,  contaminated storm waters from raw
material storage areas, etc.  The nonprocess waste waters  are  sanitary
and  clean  storm  waters,  utility  waste  waters  such as once through
cooling water, boiler blowdown, cooling tower blowdown, water  treatment
wastes  and  uncontaminated  contact  cooling  water  like tread cooling
waters.  Plants A and  B  are  new  plants  using  totally  recirculated
cooling   water.    Plants  E  and  G  are  old  facilities  also  using
recirculated water.  A comparison of these four plants indicates that no
significant variations in flow exist due to age of the plant.

Plant F typifies a plant using once-through water as its primary  source
of  process cooling.  COD and BOD loadings vary to a great degree by the
type and amount of chemicals used in the treatment of boiler and cooling
tower makeup waters.  Larger loadings for older plants indicate  an  in-
creased amount of process waste water pollutants in the effluent.  Load-
ings  measured  in  Plant  A are high due to the practice of discharging
washdowns of soapstone and latex dip areas noticed during  the  sampling
period.   This  plant uses holding lagoons.  Because all wastes are con-
tained within the plant's boundaries. Plant  A  discharges  contaminants
which  other exemplary plants  (using different technologies) can not ac-
complish.  These contaminants lead to a correspondingly higher loading.

Suspended  solid  loadings  evolve  primarily  due  to  water  treatment
blowdowns,  wastes,   and   boiler  blowdowns.  In addition, the suspended
solid loadings in process  waste  water  can  increase  due  to  spills,
leakage,  and  soapstone   discharge.  Loadings for old plants tend to be
higher than those for new  plants.  This is  due in part  to  the  use  of
                                    51

-------
            o
            o
            o —
            — (0
            ^r
            — 4)
            _§>2
oo

CM

O
                               r-.
                               O
01


O
_
(Tl
O
o
                                      CM
                                      o
o
LTV
VO
VO
CM
VO



O
            CM
            r-.
 U

 4-1
 o

.2

 0)
JO
 3
•o

to

2!
            o

            o In
               s
              3
           \ (0
8™
           .0
                              CTi
                               £•    a    o    o     o    2
                               oo    o    o    o     o    co

                               o    o    o    o     o    —'
                   i^    LA   CM
                  •Cr    LA   O"^
                   O    —   o

                   O    -'   o
                                                     oo
                                                     LTl
                                    o    .—
                           oo

                           CM
          J3

          o _ro


          2 0
tu
_l
CO
£

4-1
0)
£
u_
-*s ^
jQ JS
o C- s
^* i—
\ .

r*.
o
0

CM
O
O
o

§


o
o

o
o
o

CM
O

O
O

VO
o
o

f
o
•P r\
4-» 0 [rt
o 2 a
^^ 4-
•3 Q£ i
ro o *—
O co m 3
0) \
J 333
ro Ol ;•;; 2: -~
o a) -


4J
C
ro
CM
< CO CJ



-
o

, — ^
vo
o
*• — '
CO
OO
o





3
•z.



0



§ £ £ 5
*~" CO \O O
O ro O O

•U ^_^
^_^ CM LA
LA 'Jv? -5*
LA .4- CO •
v — ' ^^ s 	 • S2*
f^ o o r^.
LA CO CM CM
- § * S





2 -o -a TJ
° o o o



LU U_ £J 3;



LA
VO
O


CM
n
-d'
o
Co
0





o



1-^




*
w
fl
(0
!
nj
_^
P-)

Ii
"t<
a
w
1
H
U
G
H
—
,
C
c
4-1
O
C
O
4-J
a.
E

0
O
1 —
L.
E

3
f°
L.
TJ
(U
ro
E
•—
4-)
U1
LD
CM



in
O-
3
4-1
C
ro
"a.
c
•— '
4-J
0)
E
4-J
ro
i_
4J
I/)
'a;
T3
3
-—
O
C
ro









ro

4-J
8
ro
4-1
ro
o

i
<
Z?
                                                     52

-------
older water treatment techniques and the larger volumes of process waste
water containing solids discharged by older facilities.

The  quantity of dissolved solids discharged is related to the amount of
recirculated nonprocess water and the water supply source.  Plants using
well water typically have higher dissolved solid  loadings,  than  those
using municipal or river water sources.

Table 9 also shows that the plant's final end product has no significant
effect  upon  the  raw  waste  loading in the final effluent.  Data from
Plant H, which produces primarily truck and  industrial  tires,  is  not
substantially  very  different from Plants E, F, or G, which, while pro-
ducing a combination of products, produce mainly passenger tires.  Load-
ings from Plant I are similar to the others, even  though  this  plant's
primary product is the manufacture of inner tubes.

To  substantiate the data and conclusions on total final effluent, Corps
of Engineers water discharge permit applications  were  obtained  for  a
large  segment of the tire and inner tube industry,  comparison of Corps
permits for plants considered old and new revealed that the above  find-
ings and conclusions are substantially correct.  Table 10 lists the main
characteristics  and  the  loadings  corresponding  to a typical old and
typical newer tire production facility.

Raw waste loads in the  process  waste  waters  leaving  the  production
facility  are  presented  in  Table  11.  Flow rates are estimates only,
mainly due to the intermittent nature of the waste discharges.  Although
there appears to be no significant difference in the measured flow rates
as shown by data, the composition of the flows originating from old  and
new  plants differs greatly.  New Plant A uses large amounts of washdown
water which comprises the bulk of their process waste waters.  New Plant
B process waste waters consist largely of discharges from  an  extensive
wet  air  pollution  train.   The discharges from this equipment are the
primary constituent of the process  waste  waters.   The  process  waste
water  flow  rates leaving older plants are due to other  factors such as
spills, leakage, runoff from  storage areas and inherent plant  practices
of  older  facilities.  Therefore the data indicate that, given the same
housekeeping policies and the same degree of wet air pollution equipment
and controls, the process waste water  flow rates from  older plants  will
be higher than from newer plants.

Two  important characteristics of the  process waste waters are suspended
solids and oil.  The suspended solids  are generally  higher  from  older
plants  due  to  greater maintenance and poorer housekeeping and control
practices.  The same can be said for the oil.  Suspended  soilids  evolve
from  the  powdered substances used in  the compounding area and from the
collection of particulates by wet air  pollution control equipment.   The
oil  is  primarily lubrication and hydraulic oils  from in-plant sources,
and  extender  and  fuel  oil from  run-off   in   storage areas.   Both
parameters   can   be   treated   successfully.    Plant   B   is  using   a
 sedimentation  lagoon to settle  solids  collected in the compounding  area
from  wet  air pollution equipment.  It  has been demonstrated by Plants  A
and  E that solids collected in  other areas can be  separated   easily  by
                                  53

-------
             •
            0,0

               o
co   co
O   v£>
O   CO
O
CM
                                             CO  O
















o
H
ii i

CO.
^
t—
















U
c
re
a.
c
l-
c
c
c
•o
c
CO
ID
i—

c
tn
TJ
n

4j
c
a
_2
it
'4-
LU


1C
LL.
O

OJ
3
i
o
D
2
0)
<:
o
•a


I-'!
Oi O 4-1
-* 0 (D
o E
1
CO
o
1-




D1
^
Ol
1
CO
to



J1
•-X
CT1
-i£

1

O
0
o


.
01
Jb£
§
|

0
_J
U.


t
^"s, ^
:£*
o

01
CO
0



^~« "ra
_ *^
o ₯>
o 1
^ s
• co

O
-^ —
— *'C
0)

O (^
O E
t^
v, 5
• ID
O


r_
0
o
o







oo
oo
,o

o


• "ro
^ •—
»— I-
0^
O OJ
O E
f—
***** 3
~'E
co
^-' o
CM
LA
^^

^^
VO
^
VO





0
vO
vO
LA
O





-a-
LA
OO
LA







J-
O^
CM

r~-


^O
o^
CO
«l
\,O
oo

-*.
00
CO




0
o
o
CM"





o
o
0
_'







o
oc


0


CM"
^}*
^}*
^
0
0
0.
t<
co



•o
 c
•—   r~.   CM
—   oo  -d-
o   —   o
                                 1^  O
                                 CO  OO
                                                                                    LA
                                                                                    CO
                                                                          en   (T\   LA


                                                                               CM   LA
                                 CM


                                 O


                                 O
                                                                               1^   O
                                                                               on   —
                                                                               CO   CO
                                                                          co
                                                                          oo
                                                                          o
                                      o   o
                                      CM   OO
                                      O   LA
                                                                         VO  r-   —
                                                                         r--.  i~^  vo
                                                                         CM  r~~  CM
                                                                         co  o   o
                                                                         o  i—   o
                                                                         CO^  O   LA

                                                                         CM  OO   O
tn
(U
• —
•M
•—
r__
O
ID
ti-

ll)
1«
•—
I-
T3
O






OO
LA
O""\
i—

O
4-1
~~'




E
3
E
•^
C
s:










E
3
E
•—
X
ID
z:










a)
rj)
ID
L.
fl)
^








in
a>

4J
•—
r—
0
ID
U-

0)

«_
1—
3
. Sz

^^
4_)
C
0)
in
0)
a.

O
4-1

o^\
LA
—



E
3
E

c
s:










E
3
E

X
ID











a>
01
ID

0)
^








                                                                                                    in
                                                                                                    i-
                                                                                                    (D
                                                                                                   I/)

                                                                                                   Hi

                                                                                                   T3
                                                                                                   3


                                                                                                   O

                                                                                                   C
                                                                                                         I/)
                                                                                                         c
                                                                                                         o
                                                                ID
                                                                U
                                                                                                         a.
                                                                                                         Q.
                                                                S
                                                                V

                                                                C


                                                                CD


                                                               LU


                                                               M-
                                                                O


                                                                a.
                                                                L.

                                                                O
                                                               o
                                                                (U
                                                                o
                                                                U
                                                                3
                                                                O
                                                               to
                                                54

-------
H
H
          1/1
          . (C
O -Q E
o —
o--' 3
01 ro
en o
-Q 0
0 1-
O 41
O 4-
••g. ,_ „ fl

u. ID 3
O) rt
oi
^ ^C
•^
B_l
4) >
4J 1-
ro c
o c
4.
i
(



CO LA ,-r C^ f^ ^ CD CO CM
J-f-»-i OCMLAvJDvnr--
CMOZ.OO\OCM-- —
o'o oooooo







CO 0 CTA «,- LA er
cMr^$'- — zz^z
^CO CMO P>-
LA o co o cr\
»^







S^<5^r^^5S2
OOO OOLAOLAvD
OO OOOOOCM


1



I^'-crCD0<«rva<
vaoS — o5§Ln^
o o o o ^ co
o o o o o






co vo cr\
!^* t^r rf" C^N --J" 
CMvD' — 1 — LACOI^.

J
J 333ST3"D-OT3'T3
.] 1)4)4)4) — — — — —
j ZZZZOO.OOO
: CM
D <;cQOOLUU-C3I —
         E      S.
         P      _o
-a
 w
4J
 ro


4-J
 in
LU
                                                                                                                                      -Q
                                                                                                                                       ra
 ro

 ro

 ro
4-1
 ro
-a
                 ro
                 ro
                                                                                                                                              0
                                                                                                                                               ro
                                                                                                                                              o
                                                                                    55

-------
  conventional   equipment.     American  Petroleum  institute  (API)   type
  separators  are being used  to treat oily waste  effluents  of Plants B,  D?
  a                                                                   r   *
 Synthetic Rubber  Industry


 General
             C5aracteri2ation  data  were  obtained  from literature, EPA
 documents, and company records.  Plant visits   (refer  to  Section  VII)
of
    data

emulsion
                                                   data
     h                          generalized  flow  diagrams
 crumb,  solution  crumb,  and latex production facilities,

 they indicate the location of water supply and waste wate^



       " "°-   flS?n? f^W a?d ^"cteristics include  utility  waste-
        **!   4.  i virtually  impossible  to determine meaningfully total

       effiue"t flows and characteristics exclusive  of  utility  wastes

 2?ea£S£ h  ?* ^^  here  that  utility  waste waters are amenSle lo

           g SI Sustr?. treatmSnt  facilities  ^  use  and  commonly


 Emulsion Crumb Rubber Subcategory


 Flow Analysis



 Table  12  lists  the  total effluent flows for plants producing various

                       P5oducts based °n a unit of production?  ThS SSS

 ca            *? ?lant Vi^itS*   Althou9b three  plants were  sampled,   siJ
 cases  of  emulsion  crumb production were studied.   The waste water con-

         cruinno^K   Jn °ne  Plant  for  different  emulsion
         crumb  products are based on one technology, namely that of the
         company's process design and engineering.
    2'   S^i??1311^?, of ^e samPlin9 team to discern small differences
         in effluent flows for different products at the same plant.


            be "°£ed that there is no significant trend in  waste  water
             ^ Jetween the various types of emulsion crumb rubber prS-
duct  (non-extended, "hot", oil extended, and carbon black extended).



                               for emulsion crumb is 16-600
                                56

-------
   J3 XI

   ~ "~     ON
   oiO     O
   ^ O
   ^ O     CM

   CTC—
                                                   CO
                                                   o
                                                                                                    XJ
                                                                                                     
X)
XI
            X! -Q
    oio
    ^ o
    ^ o
                                   OJ
                                             OJ
                                                                     CO


                                                                     OJ
                                                          cS

                                                           OJ
                                                                                \O
                                                                                 LTN
                                                                                 OJ
                                                                                XI

                                                                                 to

                                                                                 in
                                                                                XJ
                                o
                                I/I

                                XJ
                                to
                                XJ

                                0)
                                Q.
                                in
                                3
                                U)
CM



LU


CQ
 i.
o
 U)

i
o
o
o
n xi
- —     CO
-^        ON

S>8     -
^£ O     —

05 —
                                   MA
                                   OJ
                          OJ
                          OJ
                                    O\   CO
                                                             OJ
ON
CM
CO

LO
OJ
                                                                        rrx
                                                                        VO
                                                                                              (U
                                                                                     O-


                                                                                    XI
 (D
 o
 ID
 ID
 CC
ID XI
01 •—

cnO
^ o
^ o
                       o
                          o
                          OJ
                          OJ

                          OJ
                                   o
                                   o
                                   CO
                                                     o     o
                                                     OJ    CO
                                                     OJ     ON
                                                       •I      •%

                                                     OJ     •—
                                     o
                                     o
                                             CO
                                                    ir\

                                                    VO
                                                             s
                                                             CO
                                                                     O
                                                                     o
                                                                     ir\
                                                          &
                                                          CO
          o
          o
                       ID
                       
CO
c
o
XI

ID
to

XI
c
(D

^~
•—
O


CC
CQ
CO





XI
to
~^J
c

0
OI

—


CC
CQ
CO











XI
<0
X5
C
0)

X
UJ


XJ
(U
XI
c
<0
4-*
X
UJ
I
c
o



CC
CQ
CO
                                                                                         I
                                                                                U)
                                                                                V


                                                                          Q)     !•
                                                                          ^  .   o
                                                                         iH     c
                                                                          (0     —
                                                                                             4JXI
                                                                                             
                                                                                             O ID
                                                                                                      tO O
                                                                                                     4-> C
                                                                                                      U)
                                                                                                      ID ID
                                                                                              ID

                                                                                            OJ  <
             C
             ID
                                                                         G
                                                                         td
                                                                         •H
                                                                         'O

                                                                         I
                                                      57

-------
 Raw Waste Loads

 Table  12 also summarized the raw waste loads for the six cases.   It can
 be seen that the parameter with the highest concentration is  COD.    The
 BOD  values  are generally much lower.   The high COD to BOD ratio is in-
 dicative of the high resistance of  many  of  the  constituents  in  the
 wastewaters to biological oxidation.

 The  raw  suspended  solids  concentration  in  the emulsion crumb waste
 waters were determined after separation of the rubber fines in the crumb
 pits.  Since all emulsion crumb plants  have separation  pits,   this  raw
 waste  load  data  is applicable to the industry.   Much of the suspended
 solids  contribution  is  due  to  uncoagulated   latex   solids.     The
 concentration  of  oil  does  not  appear  to be related to the degree to
 which the crumb rubber is oil  extended.    The  oil  analysis   cited is
 really   "carbon  tetrachloride  extractables"  and  will  also  include
 insoluble monomers.

 Another significant parameter in emulsion  crumb waste  waters   is   total
 dissolved  solids.    This  is  due  to   the  use  of   salt  in the  crumb
 coagulation process  and associated rinse over flows.


 Surfactants are  another  characteristic  produced by  the  emulsifying
 agents.    The  level  of  surfactants in the waste water is  considerably
 lower than the  parameters reported in Table 13.

 Individual Waste  Streams

 Table 13  presents the major constituent  loadings of the  principal waste-
 water  streams  in  an  emulsion  crumb  plant.    The  most  significant
 parameter  is   total  dissolved solids which is  produced by  the acid  and
 brine coagulation liquors.    The  coagulation  liquor  and   crumb   rinse
 overflows,   along with the  utility wastes,  provide the bulk  of the  total
 dissolved solids  in  the  plant   effluent.    It   can  be   seen  that   the
 quantity    of   surfactants   produced  are   much  lower   than  the   other
 parameters.   Surfactants are generated in  appreciable  quantities only by
 waste streams included in Table   12.   The   suspended  solids  are  much
 higher  than in   the total  effluent since  the crumb pits remove much of
 the suspended solids  in the  crumb  rinse overflow.  Removals  better  than
 95  percent are   common.    oil  entrained  in the  rubber  is  also removed
 along with rubber crumb solids.

 When  comparing the sub-total  parameter  values  of  Table  13  with  the
 average  total  effluent  loads of Table 12,  it can  be seen that the three
 streams listed in Table  13 are  the  major  contributors  to  the  total
 effluent.

The   spent   caustic   scrub   solution is an  extremely low flow rate waste
water  which  has   very   high   COD,   alkalinity,   pH,   and   color
 characteristics.   It  is  not, however, a  significant waste stream when
combined in the total effluent.  It is usually bled-in at low flow rates
into the effluent.
                                 58

-------


4->
C
03
0.
L-
0)
XI
XI
3
C£
CO
1—
J^t
<
o
£
OC
co

»
X>
O
0
0
^
X!



CT

^
^ 	 ^

XI


— . . r^ oo
o ^ r^* 'f*^
0 • 00
o z. o o
0 00






C
o
 13

UJ

 C
 ID
 in

 03
 0)

 4-"
to
                     O
                     O
                     0    "~.
o

o
VD
                            CM
                                      LTV
                                      Cvl
(D
4_J
in
03
03
3
T3
>
-a
c

•—
03
O_
o
c
CT
1
co

O
o
0
•~
^Q
^3.

_
*s
^.
^
CT
1
O
O
CQ

^ 	 ^
m
XI
o
0
0
^,
XI
Nfc— "^

OO • J" CM
0 < -d" IA
O ^2 CO CO
m co





J- • vo o
, _ < _d- ws
o z: 
4->
in
03 E
3 03

a: to
*

>
o
L.
o
3
CT
« —
_J
C
O

03

3
CT)
§
O
OY
CO
^0



CM
1
i—
14—
i-
03
>
O
0)
tn
c
oe

XJ
E
3
0
co
oo









«—
03
4->
O
1—
1
3
to





.
-o
0)
o
3
•D
0)

03
03

tn

"a>
0)
~
'o
-D
C
03
in
._•
r—
O
.
-a
a>
-o
c
a>
a.
V)
3
in
V
x:
0)
a>
x:
3
J1
a.
•i
3

O
O
4-1
o
'C
CL

-o
C
'i
Q)
4->
T3

-o
03
0


03
4J
in
03


3
01
(£.
V—
0)
O
tn
03
-o

(/>
c
•—

-i
i_
o
0)
x:
4-1

*
a>
in
03
0

0)
c
o

c
—
CM


























































,
E
03
0)

4_)
in

•CT
0)
C
•—
o
• e
o
0

























































.

03

4J
0
C

03
4-1
03
O

                                                  59

-------
 Area washdown and equipment clean-out waste  waters   are  highly  loaded
 with COD and suspended solids,  and,  by nature,  are intermittent in flow.
 They  cannot be characterized because they are  generated on an irregular
 basis and have greatly variable concentration loadings.

 Chromium and zinc are present in low concentrations  (0.1   mg/L)   in the
 final effluent.   They are present due to cooling water treatment,  and in
 some cases can be eliminated or reduced by substitution  of chromium-free
 corrosion  inhibitors.    Heavy   metals from catalysts and other reaction
 ingredients are not  present in   measurable  concentrations  in  emulsion
 plant waste water effluents.

 Solution Crumb Rubber subcateggry

 Flow Analysis

 Table  14  presents   the  total  effluent waste water flows for  facilities
 producing various solution  crumb rubber  products.    The   flow  data  is
 given  in  terms  of  liters  per metric ton (kkg) of production.  Five
 plants were visited  and eight  types   of  solution crumb  product  were
 sampled.     some  plants   are   multi-product    facilities,    and the
 contributions of the solution crumb  facilities were accounted  for.

 Table 14 shows that  there is  no discernible difference in  the  effluent
 flows  between  types  of product.  There appears  to  be more correlation
 between products at  the  same  plant   site.   This  is similar, to the
 findings for emulsion crumb rubber production.

 One   plant (Plant M)  has  a  considerably lower effluent flow than all the
 other facilities.  The  apparent reason for this difference  is  the use of
 a special rubber-finishing  process which generates  very  little or  no
 waste water.

 The   average   effluent  flow  for solution plants  is  similar to  emulsion
 plants,  and typically approximates 16,600  L/kkg (2000  gal/1000  Ib)  of
 production.

 Raw Waste Loads

 Table  14  also  presents  the raw waste loads  for the four main parameters.
 It can  be seen that the constituent levels  are approximately one half of
 those   present in  emulsion crumb waste waters.  This supports  literature
 and company data which  indicate that the  solution  production  processes
 are   "cleaner" than their emulsion counterparts.  The  main  factor behind
 this  is the absence of  coagulation liquor and uncoagulated  latex.   The
COD  to BOD ratio  is high which indicates that a considerable  proportion
 of  the   raw  waste  water  components  are  not  readily   biologically
 oxidizable.

The total  dissolved solids content of solution crumb waste water is con-
 siderably   lower  than  for emulsion crumb plants.   This again is mainly
due to the absence of the coagulation liquor.
                                60

-------
o
   o
Vt, it
  S-
 J3   •—   O
•—   co   oj
               OJ
                             t-   —
                             o   o
                       OJ
                            —   o
                             o

                             o
^
OJ*
                                                 OJ
                                           t-   —
                                           N    t-
oo
o
               CO


               OJ*
                                                              •o


                                                               §
                                                              •u
                                                               
Jw
™
«£ •
in '
T3
ID 3
5 3
u!
(U
4->
in
3
5
ID














•X

ff""
^ O
5* *
* ^™


\
— .a
2_-






\
(0 ^~-v
J?8
-^ o







roduct
Q_









°
O






s

^^.^
o
VD

~u c
c 0
'(D -Q
i i *
t3 X (D
0) LU O
"U
C — S -0
ID — Q C
4-> O Q- (D
X LU
LU 4-> r—
C ?5 £5
O Q-
*Z *> -M
^ «v <
C£. CQ OQ ID
— CL Q. O.



g;
Id
in
& Z
• o
•— in
•D
0)
1
U)
3
in
S1 "*
ON *
(U
1

tn
4J

'a.
JD
0
0
(D
J_
in
. c
T3
"O
.8

(U g U) (B
C rH 0) -Q
ID Bj T) ID
X *> T3 ~
LU ID ID
S ° >
-^ lo *"- (D
O _i
ro d CD 4J
S 0) £ §
S ID
3 %
ID Q
    (D


    SI
                             61

-------
 Surfactant  concentrations  in  the  total  plant  effluent   are   low.
 Surfactants   are   used  to  de-agglomerate  the  crumb  rubber  during
 coagulation and rinsing.
The solvent recovery systems  do not produce  any
the COD  or  BOD content of the effluent.
significant  effect  on
One   plant   (Plant   M)   has  considerably lower  loadings  than  the  others.
This  is  probably  due to   the  fact   that  rubber   for  non-tire   use  is
produced at   this   plant.   This   rubber is used  to manufacture  impact-
resistant resins, and its quality and production controls  are extremely
critical.   In  addition,  special  finishing equipment appears to be used.

Individual  Waste  Streams

The   crumb  rinse overflow produced at a solution  crumb  plant is  similar
to that  produced  at  an emulsion  crumb plant, with  the  exception that uii-
coagulated  latex  is  not  present.  The suspended   solids,  mostly crumb
rubber   fines,  are   similar to  those in emulsion  crumb  rinse overflows;
the crumb pits produce the same  reductions.

The monomer and solvent  recovery wastes  are comparable  to the   monomer
recovery wastes from emulsion  plants.  Although heavy  slops are produced
in    some   plants,   these   are  usually  disposed of  by drumming  or
incineration.  Since monomer purities must be high, recovered butadiene,
for example, is returned to  the  monomer  supply  plant and has  no   impact
on the solution crumb rubber waste  water.

Equipment clean-out  waste waters are less of an environmental problem in
a  solution plant because much  of  the processing  equipment must  be kept
dry or water free.   Area washdowns  are similar  in  volume,  but   do  not
contain  latex.   These   washdowns  do pick-up rubber solids and oil from
pumps and machinery  areas.

The spent caustic scrub  solution, where  used, is identical to that  used
in  emulsion  crumb   production.    In plants where emulsion and solution
crumb rubber is produced, the  same  caustic scrub system  is used for both
facilities.

Catalysts and other  reaction   ingredients  do   not  produce   discernible
quantities  of heavy metals  or toxic  constituents.  Chromium  and  zinc in
cooling tower blowdown are present   in   some  plant  effluents,   but  in
concentrations  of 0.1 mg/L' or less  in the final effluent.  These can be
eliminated  or reduced by using cheromium-free corrosion  inhibitors.

I>atex Rubber Subcatecrpry

Flow Analysis

Table 15 lists the total  effluent flows for latex rubber  plants.    Only
two  plants are presented, but the similarity between the data values is
good.  Latex plants  are  generally part of  larger  complexes,   and  flow
data  for   latex operations is difficult to obtain.  The flow from latex
                                 62

-------
.a JD


~qio
 en —
 O)
  .8
o


MD
                   vo
       t-



      VD









m
H
LU

oo

>-









c , ,
(D

t
- Q
l_ O
4) CD
J3
S
ce.
^S^x-^*
J3 J3

^io '
**»?
cn —
•^
8-
4-1
ID
u
O
<+- Q
O
v> 0
"O
(0
5
^"".Q
^-" F«—
^ 	 ^
CT)O
J8
^\ •*
Of—
4J
U)
ID
3
ID
cc 3
_J
U.
— x-^.
ID -Q
cnrr
^O
j«: o



piH pa*
vq o
u\ ir\






t*— C\J
K*\ '^
* *
^ !?1




§> o
«l ••
^— ^
**-S V 	 ;
8 8
ON O



{turn
tc\






LT\
ON
•s
•^









 •§
            C£.
            CD ,
 Qi
 CD

 co
  C

  (0
cc
CO
in
                            
-------
plants appears to be lower than  from either emulsion crumb  or  solution
crumb   facilities.   The  major flow  contributions  at  latex  plants
originate with equipment cleaning, area washdown operations, and  waters
from vacuum pump seal systems.

Raw Haste Loads

The  raw waste loads of latex plant waste waters are considerably higher
than either emulsion or solution crumb plants.  Equipment  cleanout  and
area   washdowns   are   frequent  due  to  smaller  produce  runs,  and
considerable quantities of uncoagulated latex  are  contained  in  these
waste  waters.   The  high  COD  to BOD ratio is typical of all synthetic
rubber  subcategories  and  underlines  the  resistance  to   biological
oxidation  of  the waste water constituents.  Oil concentration is lower
than in emulsion or solution crumb  facilities  and  is  contributed  by
separable  monomers,  such  as   styrene,  in  the wastes.  The suspended
solids in the effluent are due   mainly  to  uncoagulated  latex.   Total
dissolved  solid  levels  are  lower than for emulsion plants because of
coagulation liquor stream.  Surfactants are present, but in  much  lower
concentrations than the other parameters.

Individual Waste Streams

Tank,  reactor,  and filter cleaning produces considerable quantities of
waste water.  These are characterized by high COD,  BOD,  and  suspended
solids.   In  addition,  unloading and product loading areas and general
plant areas are frequently washed down.  The  characteristics  of  these
wastes are similar to those produced by usual equipment cleaning in this
industry.   Vacuum pump seal waters contain small quantities of organics
which  produce  moderate  levels  of  COD .from  the  vacuum   stripping
operation.   The stripping condensates contain condensed monomers.   Most
of these monomers are decanted from the water and  re-used.   The  water
layer overflow from the decanter has high COD and BOD concentrations.

Spent  caustic  scrub  solution  is  an extremely low flow waste and has
similar characteristics to spent solutions produced  in  emulsion  crumb
and solution crumb plants.
                                  64

-------
                                SECTION VI

                    SELECTION  OF POLLUTION  PARAMETERS
Tire  and  Inner Tube  Industry

From   review of  the  U.S. Army Corps  of  Engineers  Permit  Applications  for
direct discharge of  waste waters  from tire   and   inner  tube   production
facilities   and   examination   of  related, published  data,  it appears that
the following constituents  are present  in measurable  quantities   in   the
waste water  effluents  from  tire and  inner tube production facilities:

    BOD
    COD                                 ;
    Suspended Solids.
    Total Dissolved  Solids
    Oil and  Grease
    pH
    Temperature  (Heat)                   '
    Chromium

Examination   of   in-plant and anlytical data obtained during  the  on-site
inspections  of a number of  production facilities  indicates that   certain
parameters   are  present only  in insignificant amounts or are  contributed
by discharges unrelated to  the process  facilities.   These   nonprocess
effluents result mainly from utility and water treatment discharges  and
from  domestic waste  water discharges generated within the plant   bounda-
ries.  Such nonprocess-related   discharges are  the  subject of other
studies and  are  intended to be covered  by other EPA documents.

In the following part  of this section,  the  rationale  for elimination   or
selection of the   aforementioned parameters is  discussed and recommen-
dations proposed.

BOD

Biochemical  oxygen demand  (BOD) refers  to the amount  of  oxygen required
to stabilize biodegradable  organic matter under aerobic  conditions.   BOD
concentrations   measured  in   waste   waters discharged by tire and inner
tube  production  facilities  are very  low.  Their presence is due   primar-
•ily   to  the organics  used  in the soapstone and latex dipping solutions.
"Concentration values range  from less than 1 mg/L  to 30 mg/L for   process
waste  waters at the  plants  visited; most  of the values obtained in  the
course of these  visits were   less  than 5  mg/L.    Consequently,  this
parameter was   considered  insignificant  in this  segment of the rubber
industry. Higher concentration values   of   BOD   in  the  effluents   did
result   when domestic  wastes  were  combined   with the process   and
nonprocess waters and  also  after  combining  certain  chemical boiler water
treatment discharges.

Biochemical  oxygen demand  (BOD) is a measure of  the oxygen consuming
capabilities of  organic matter.   The BOD, does not in  itself cause direct
                                  65

-------
harm  to  a  water  system,  but  it  does  exert  an indirect effect by
depressing the oxygen content of the water.  Sewage  and  other  organic
effluents during their processes of decomposition exert a BOD, which can
have  a  catastrophic  effect  on  the ecosystem by depleting the oxygen
supply.  Conditions are reached frequently where all of  the  oxygen  is
used  and  the continuing decay process causes the production of noxious
gases such as hydrogen sulfide and  methane.   Water  with  a  high  BOD
indicates the presence of decomposing organic matter and subsequent high
bacterial counts that degrade its quality and potential uses.

Dissolved   oxygen    (DO)  is  a  water  quality  constituent  that,  in
appropriate concentrations, is essential  not  only  to  keep  organisms
living  but  also  to  sustain  species  reproduction,  vigor,  and  the
development of populations.  Organisms undergo stress  at  reduced  D.O.
concentrations that make them less competitive and able to sustain their
species  within  the  aquatic  environment.   For  example,  reduced  DO
concentrations have been shown to interfere with fish population through
delayed hatching of eggs, reduced size and vigor of embryos,  production
of  deformities in young, interference with food digestion, acceleration
of blood clotting, decreased tolerance  to  certain  toxicants,  reduced
food  efficiency and growth rate, and reduced maximum sustained swimming
speed.   Fish  food  organisms  are  likewise  affected   adversely   in
conditions with suppressed DO.  Since all aerobic aquatic organisms need
a  certain amount of oxygen, the consequences of total lack of dissolved
oxygen due to a high BOD can kill all inhabitants of the affected area.

If a high BOD is present, the quality of the water is  usually  visually
degraded  by  the presence of decomposing materials and algae blooms due
to the uptake of degraded materials that  form  the  foodstuffs  of  the
algal populations.

cos

Chemical oxygen demand (COD) provides a measure of the equivalent oxygen
required to chemically oxidize the organic/inorganic material present in
a  waste  water sample.  COD in tire and inner tube process waste waters
is  attributable  to  principally   washdown   and   runoff   from  .oil
contaminated,  soapstone  and latex dip areas.  In addition intermittent
discharges of spent soapstone and latex solutions contribute to the  COD
of  the process waste waters.  COD levels generally range from 5 mg/L to
30 mg/L.  Accordingly it is not necessary to subject tire and inner tube
plant process effluents to COD limitations if suspended solids  and  oil
and grease are controlled.                                             ;

Suspended Solids

Suspended  solids  after  discharge  to a water course can settle to the
bottom and blanket spawning grounds, interfere with fish propagation,  ah
may exert an appreciable oxygen demand on the body of water.   Suspended
solids  in  tire  and  tube  plant  waste waters are due to washdown and
runoff from compounding areas, discharges  of  soapstone  solution,  and
boiler  blowdowns  and  water  treatment  wastes.   In  the normal daily
production operation, the nonprocess blowdowns and the  water  treatment
                                   66

-------
wastes   will  con-tribute  the  largest  amounts  of  suspended  solids.
Suspended solids concentrations in process waste waters will  vary  from
less  than  10  mg/L (with proper in-plant controls) to over 20,000 mg/L
during soapstone solution dumping and discharge.

Suspended solids include both  organic  and  inorganic  materials.   The
inorganic components include sand, silt, and clay.  The organic fraction
includes  such materials as grease, oil, tar, animal and vegetable fats,
various fibers, sawdust, hair, and various materials from sewers.  These
solids may settle out rapidly and bottom deposits are often a mixture of
both organic and inorganic solids.  They adversely affect  fisheries  by
covering  the  bottom  of  the stream or lake with a blanket of material
that destroys the fish-food bottom fauna or the spawning ground of fish.
Deposits containing organic materials may deplete bottom oxygen supplies
and produce hydrogen sulfide, carbon dioxide, methane, and other noxious
gases.

In raw water sources for  domestic  use,  state  and  regional  agencies
generally  specify that suspended solids in streams shall not be present
in sufficient concentration to be objectionable  or  to  interfere  with
normal  treatment  processes.   Suspended  solids in water may interfere
with many  industrial  processes,  and  cause  foaming  in  boilers,  or
encrustations   on   equipment  exposed  to  water,  especially  as  the
temperature rises.   Suspended  solids  are  undesirable  in  water  for
textile   industries;   paper   and  pulp;  beverages;  dairy  products;
laundries; dyeing;  photography;  cooling  systems,  and  power  plants.
Suspended  particles  also serve as a transport mechanism for pesticides
and other  substances  which  are  readily  sorbed  into  or  onto  clay
particles.

Solids  may be suspended in water for a time, and then settle to the bed
of the stream or lake.   These settleable solids  discharged  with  man's
wastes   may  be  inert,  slowly  biodegradable  materials,  or  rapidly
decomposable  substances.   While  in  suspension,  they  increase   the
turbidity  of  the  water,  reduce  light  penetration  and  impair  the
photosynthetic activity of aquatic plants.

Solids in suspension are aesthetically displeasing.  When they settle to
form sludge deposits on the stream or lake bed, they are often much more
damaging to the life in water, and they retain the capacity to displease
the senses.  Solids, when transformed  to  sludge  deposits,  may  do  a
variety  of damaging things, including blanketing the stream or lake bed
and thereby destroying the living spaces  for  those  benthic  organisms
that  would  otherwise  occupy  the  habitat.   When  of  an organic and.
therefore decomposable nature, solids  use  a  portion  or  all  of  the
dissolved oxygen available in the area.  Organic materials also serve as
a  seemingly  inexhaustible  food  source for sludgeworms and associated
organisms.

Turbidity is principally a measure of the light absorbing properties  of
s/uspended  solids.   It  is  frequently  used  as a substitute method of
quickly estimating the total suspended solids when the concentration  -is
relatively low.
                                 67

-------
 £o;fca.l_Dissolved solids

 High  concentrations  of  dissolved solids (TDS)  originate from the non-
 process waste water effluents from cooling towers,  boiler blowdowns, and
 water treatment system backwashes  and  blowdowns.    In  addition,   high
 concentrations  of TDS were observed in all effluents when the raw water
 supply was from deep wells rather than city water.

 In natural waters the dissolved solids  consist  mainly  of  carbonates,
 chlorides,  sulfates,  phosphates,  and  possibly  nitrates  of calcium,
 magnesium, sodium, and potassium, with traces  of  iron,   manganese  and
 other substances.

 Many  communities  in the United States and in other countries use  water
 supplies containing 2000 to UOOO mg/1 of dissolved  salts,  when no better
 water is available.   Such waters  are  not  palatable,  may  not  quench
 thirst,   and may have a laxative action on new users.   Waters containing
 more than 4000 mg/1 of total salts are generally  considered  unfit  for
 human  use,  although in hot climates such higher  salt concentrations can
 be tolerated whereas they could not be in  temperate  climates.   Waters
 containing  5000  mg/1  or  more  are  reported  to be bitter and act as
 bladder  and  intestinal irritants.  It is generally  agreed  that the   salt'
 concentration of good, palatable water should not exceed 500 mg/1.

 Limiting  concentrations  of  di-ssolved  solids for fresh-water fish may
 range from  5,000  to  10,000  mg/1,   according  to  species  and  prior
 acclimatization.   Some fish are adapted to living in more  saline waters,
 and a few species of fresh-water forms have been  found  in  natural waters
 with  a   salt  concentration  of 15,000 to 20,000 mg/1.  Fish can slowly
 become acclimatized  to higher salinities,  but  fish  in waters   of  low
 salinity  cannot  survive   sudden  exposure  to high salinities,  such as
 those resulting from discharges of oil-well  brines.    Dissolved solids
 may influence the toxicity of heavy metals and organic  compounds to fish
 and  other aquatic life, primarily because of the antagonistic effect of
 hardness on  metals.

 Waters with  total dissolved solids over 500 mg/1  have decreasing utility
 as  irrigation water.   At 5,000  mg/1 water  has little  or   no  value  for
 irrigation.

 Dissolved  solids  in  industrial waters can cause foaming  in boilers  and
 cause  interference with  cleaness,  color,   or  taste  of   many   finished
 products.    High   contents   of   dissolved  solids  also tend to accelerate
 corrosion.

 Specific conductance is  a measure  of the capacity of water to convey  an
 electric  current.   This property is related to  the total concentration
 of  ionized substances  in water  and water temperature.  This  property  is
 frequently   used  as   a  •substitute  method   of   quickly  estimating the
dissolved solids  concentration.

Oil and Grease
                                68

-------
Oil and Grease is a measure of  the  insoluble  hydrocarbons  and  free-
floating  and emulsufied oil in a wastewater sample.  Oil and grease are
critical to waste  water  treatment  and  stream  ecology  because  they
interfere  with  oxygen transfer.  Oil and grease exist in process waste
waters due to washdown, runoff, spills, and leakage in the process areas
which pick up lubricating oil  from  machinery  and  extender  oil  from
storage  areas.   Concentration  values in the total effluent range from
less than 5 mg/L to 83 mg/L.  Concentrations in the total plant effluent
are not indicative of the oil and grease problem because of dilution  by
nonprocess  waste  waters.   Loadings  in the plants visited ranged from
less than 1 kg/kkg to 5.U7 kg/kkg of raw material.   Since  oily  wastes
result  from  intermittent  flows,  instantaneous  values  could be much
higher at times.

Oil and grease exhibit an oxygen demand.  Oil emulsions  may  adhere  to
the  gills  of  fish  or  coat  and  destroy  algae  or  other plankton.
Deposition of oil in the bottom sediments can serve  to  exhibit  normal
benthic  growths, thus interrupting the aquatic food chain.  Soluble and
emulsified material ingested by fish may taint the flavor  of  the  fish
flesh.   Water  soluble  components  may  exert  toxic  action  on fish.
Floating oil may reduce the re-aeration of  the  water  surface  and  in
conjunction  with  emulsified  oil  may  interfere  with photosynthesis.
Water insoluble components damage the plumage and costs of water animals
and fowls.  Oil and grease in a water can result  in  the  formation  of
objectionable  surface slicks preventing the full aesthetic enjoyment of
the water.

Oil spills can damage the surface of boats and can destroy the aesthetic
characteristics of beaches and shorelines.
                                 69

-------
ES

Control and adjustment of pH in the process waste  waters  generated  in
the  tire  and  inner  tube segment of the industry should be practiced.
Failure to maintain adequate control can have a  deleterious  effect  on
acquatic life, post-precipitation of soluble salts, etc.

Acidity  and  alkalinity  are  reciprocal terms.  Acidity is produced by
substances that yield hydrogen ions upon hydrolysis  and  alkalinity  is
produced  by  substances  that  yield  hydroxyl  ions.  The terms "total
acidity" and "total alkalinity" are often used to express the  buffering
capacity  of  a solution.  Acidity in natural waters is caused by carbon
dioxide, mineral acids, weakly  dissociated  acids,  and  the  salts  of
strong  acids  and weak bases.  Alkalinity is caused by strong bases and
the salts of strong alkalies and weak acids.

The term pH is a logarithmic expression of the concentration of hydrogen
ions.  At a pH of 7, the hydrogen and hydroxyl  ion  concentrations  are
essentially  equal  and  the water is neutral.  Lower pH values indicate
acidity while  higher  values  indicate  alkalinity.   The  relationship
between  pH  and  acidity  or  alkalinity  is  not necessarily linear or
direct.

Waters with a pH below 6.0 are  corrosive  to  water  works  structures,
distribution  lines,  and  household  plumbing fixtures and can thus add
such constituents to drinking water as iron, copper, zinc,  cadmium  and
lead.   The  hydrogen  ion  concentration  can affect the "taste" of the
water.  At a low pH water tastes "sour".   The  bactericidal  effect  of
chlorine is weakened as the pH increases, and it is advantageous to keep
the pH close to 7.  This is very significant for providing safe drinking
water.

Extremes  of  pH or rapid pH changes can exert stress conditions or kill
aquatic life outright.  Dead fish, associated  algal  blooms,  and  foul
stenches  are  aesthetic  liabilities  of  any  waterway.  Even moderate
changes from "acceptable" criteria limits of pH are deleterious to  some
species.   The  relative  toxicity  to aquatic life of many materials is
increased by changes in  the  water  pH.   Metalocyanide  complexes  can
increase  a  thousand-fold in toxicity with a drop of 1.5 pH units.  The
availability of many nutrient substances varies with the alkalinity  and
acidity.  Ammonia is more lethal with a higher pH.

The  lacrimal fluid of the human eye has a pH of approximately 7.0 and a
deviation of 0.1 pH unit from the norm may result in eye irritation  for
the swimmer.  Appreciable irritation will cause severe pain.

Temperature (Heat)

Elevated temperatures in total plant effluents occur only when collected
steam  condensate (utility waste)  is not recycled but is discharged into
the plant effluent.    Excessive  temperatives  are  not  encountered  in
process  waste  waters.   Consequently,  a  temperature  limitation  for
process waste waters is not considered necessary.  Although  temperature
                                 70

-------
is   a  potential  problem  for  direct  discharge,  it  appears  to  be
insignificant in the total plant effluent when controlling and  treating
process waste waters.

Temperature  is  one of the most important and influential water quality
characteristics.  Temperature  determines  those  species  that  may  be
present;  it  activates the hatching of young, regulates their activity,
and stimulates or suppresses their growth and development; it  attracts,
and  may  kill  when  the  water  becomes too hot or becomes chilled too
suddenly.  Colder water generally suppresses development.  Warmer  water
generally  accelerates  activity  and  may be a primary cause of aquatic
plant nuisances when other environmental factors are suitable.

Temperature is a prime regulator of natural processes within  the  water
environment.   It  governs  physiological  functions  in  organisms and,
acting directly or indirectly in combination with  other  water  quality
constituents,  it  affects aquatic life with each change.  These effects
include  chemical  reaction  rates,   enzymatic   functions,   molecular
movements,  and molecular exchanges between membranes within and between
the physiological systems and the organs of an animal.

Chemical reaction rates vary with temperature and generally increase  as
the  temperature  is increased.  The solubility of gases in water varies
with temperature.   Dissolved  oxygen  is  decreased  by  the  decay  or
decomposition  of  dissolved  organic  substances  and  the  decay  rate
increases as the temperature of the water increases reaching  a  maximum
at  about  30°C  (86°F).   The  temperature of stream water, even during
summer,  is  below  the  optimum  for   pollution-associated   bacteria.
Increasing  the water temperature increases the bacterial multiplication
rate when the environment is favorable and the food supply is abundant.

Reproduction  cycles  may  be   changed   significantly   by   increased
temperature   because   this   function  takes  place  under  restricted
temperature ranges.  Spawning may not occur at all because  temperatures
are  too  high.  Thus, a fish population may exist in a heated area only
by  continued  immigration.   Disregarding  the  decreased  reproductive
potential, water temperatures need not reach lethal levels to decimate a
species.  Temperatures that favor competitors, predators, parasites, and
disease can destroy a species at levels far below those that are lethal.
Fish  food
exceed 90°F
decreased,
drastically
may  cause
favorable.
organisms are altered severely when temperatures approach or
  Predominant algal species change,  primary  production  is
and  bottom  associated organisms may be depleted or altered
in numbers and distribution.  Increased  water  temperatures
aquatic plant nuisances when other environmental factors are
Synergistic actions of  pollutants  are  more  severe  at  higher  water
temperatures.   Given amounts of domestic sewage, refinery wastes, oils,
tars, insecticides, detergents, and  fertilizers  more  rapidly  deplete
oxygen  in  water  at higher temperatures, and the respective toxicities
are likewise increased.
                                 71

-------
When water temperatures increase,  the  predominant  algal  species  may
change  from  diatoms to green algae, and finally at high temperatures to
blue-green algae, because of species temperature  preferentials.   Blue-
green   algae   can   cause  serious  odor  problems.   The  number  and
distribution  of benthic  organisms  decreases  as  water  temperatures
increase  above  90°F,  which  is  close  to the tolerance limit for the
population.   This could seriously affect certain  fish  that  depend  on
benthinc organisms as a food source.

The cost of fish being attracted to heated water in winter months may be
considerable,  due  to  fish  mortalities  that may result when the fish
return to the cooler water.

Rising temperatures stimulate the decomposition of sludge, formation  of
sludge   gas,    multiplication   of   saprophytic   bacteria  and  fungi
(particularly in the presence of organic wastes), and the consumption of
oxygen by putrefactive processes, thus affecting the esthetic value of a
water course.

In general, marine water temperatures do not change as rapidly or  range
as  widely  as   those  of  freshwaters.   Marine  and  estuarine fishes,
therefore, are less tolerant of temperature  variation.   Although  this
limited  tolerance  is  greater  in  estuarine than in open water marine
species, temperature changes are  more  important  to  those  fishes  in
estuaries  and   bays  than to those in open marine areas, because of the
nursery and replenishment functions of the estuary that can be adversely
affected by extreme temperature changes.

Chromium

Heavy metals  such as chromium are toxic to  micro-organisms  because  of
their  ability   to  tie up the proteins in the key enzyme systems of the
micro-organism.  Chromium appears in the  nonprocess  discharges  mainly
from  the  cooling  tower  blowdown.   Chromium - compounds are used as a
corrosion inhibitor and added to the tower basin or cooling tower  make-
up.  Chromium and other heavy metals will normally not be present in the
process waste water effluent.

Chromium,  in  its  various valence states, is hazardous to man.   It can
produce lung tumors when inhaled and induces skin sensitizations.  Large
doses of chromates have corrosive effects on the  intestinal  tract  and
can  cause  inflammation  of  the kidneys.  Levels of chromate ions that
have no effect on man appear to be so low as to  prohibit  determination
to date.

The  toxicity  of  chromium salts toward aquatic life varies widely with
the species, temperature, pH, valence of the chromium,   and  synergistic
or   antagonistic  effects,  especially  that  of  hardness.    Fish  are
relatively tolerant of chromium salts, but fish food organisms and other
lower forms of aquatic life  are  extremely  sensitive.  ,  chromium  also
inhibits the growth of algae.
                                 72

-------
In  some  agricultural crops, chromium can cause reduced growth or death
of the crop.  Adverse effects of low concentrations of chromium on corn,
tobacco and sugar beets have been documented.

Summary of Significant Pollutants

Of the pollutants examined, only, suspended solids, oil and grease,  and
pH  are significant characteristics when considering process waste water
discharges.  All three parameters, suspended solids, and,oil and grease,
and pH need to be controlled, treated, and monitored.   The  recommended
list of control parameters for tire and inner tube plants, therefore, is
as follows:

    Suspended Solids
    Oil and Grease
    PH

Synthetic Rubber Industry

In  view  of  the  fact  that  similar processing techniques and similar
catalysts and monomeric raw materials are used in emulsion crumb rubber,
solution crumb rubber, and latex rubber production, it is appropriate to
consider the same waste water parameters for the three synthetic  rubber
subcategories.

Review  of the published literature, EPA documents, industry records and
the findings of the  plant visits indicated that the following  chemical,
physical  and  biological constituents are pollutants  (as defined in the
Federal Water  Pollution  Control  Act  Amendments  of  1972)  found  in
measurable quantities  from synthetic rubber  plant waste water  effluents:

    COD
    BOD
    Suspended Solids
    Total Dissolved  Solids
    Oil and Grease
    PH                                   :
    Acidity/Alkalinity
    Surfactants
    Color
    Temperature  (Heat)

These  parameters  are present  in the  raw waste  streams of  all synthetic
rubber  plants.   Pollutants in utility  and service  water systems   and  in
water  treatment  system  regenerations  and  backwashes  are outside the
scope of this  document and will be the subject of  a separate  study  and
at a  future date.

COD

 Since  numerous  organic compounds contact  process  waste waters,  COD will
 occur in the  plant effluent. Values range  from 9.3  kg/kkg(lb/1000  Ib)
                                  73

-------
 of  production  for  solution
 production for latex rubber.
crumb.   to  3U.95  kg/kkg(lb/1000 Ib)  of
 Treatment techniques reduce this contaminant,  but high   residual   levels
 still  exist  in  the  treated effluent.   This is indicative  of the  fact
 that some  waste  water  constituents  have high  biological oxidation
 resistance or inorganic oxygen demand.

 BOD

 For the same reasons as for COD, moderate  to high BOD concentrations are
 present  in synthetic rubber plant waste waters.   Values range from  1.13
 kg/kkg{lb/1000   Ib)   of  production   for   solution    crumb   to    5.30
 kg/kkg(lb/1000   Ib)   of  production  for latex  rubber.   Typical industry-
 wide flow1 and production data show that this pollutant  can be reduced by
 biological treatment to reasonably low  levels  (10 mg/L).

 Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD)  is a measure   of   the   oxygen consuming
 capabilities of  organic matter.   The BOD does  not in itself cause  direct
 harm to  a  water  system,   but it does exert  an indirect effect by
 depressing the oxygen content of the water. , Sewage and other  organic
 effluents  during their processes of  decomposition exert a BOD, which can
 have a  catastrophic  effect  on the  ecosystem  by depleting the  oxygen
 supply.  Conditions  are reached frequently where  all of  the  oxygen  is
 used and   the continuing decay process causes the production of noxious
 gases such as hydrogen sulfide and   methane.   Water  with  a high  BOD
 indicates  the presence of decomposing organic matter and subsequent high
 bacterial  counts that degrade its quality  and  potential uses.

 Dissolved    oxygen   (DO)   is  a water quality   constituent that,  in
 appropriate concentrations,  is essential   not  only to  keep organisms
 living   but  also  to  sustain  species reproduction,   vigor,  and  the
 development of populations.   Organisms  undergo stress   at reduced  D.O.
 concentrations that  make  them less competitive and able to sustain their
 species  within  the  aquatic  environment.   For  example,   reduced  DO
 concentrations have  been  shown to interfere with  fish population through
 delayed  hatching of  eggs, reduced size  and vigor  of embryos,  production
 of   deformities  in young, interference  with food  digestion, acceleration
 of blood clotting, decreased  tolerance  to certain  toxicants,  reduced
 food  efficiency and growth rate, and reduced maximum sustained swimming
 speed.^  Fish  food   organisms   are   likewise  affected  adversely   in
 conditions  with  suppressed DO.   Since all  aerobic aquatic organisms need
 a  certain  amount  of oxygen,  the  consequences of  total  lack of dissolved
 oxygen due  to a high BOD  can  kill all inhabitants  of the  affected area.

 If a high BOD is present, the quality of the water  is   usually  visually
 degraded  by  the presence of decomposing materials and algae blooms due
to the uptake of degraded materials that   form  the  foodstuffs  of  the
algal populations.

Suspended Solids
                                 74

-------
In  emulsion  crumb  and latex plants, uncoagulated latex contributes to
high suspended solids.  These can be removed by chemical coagulation  or
air flotation followed by clarification.  In both the emulsion crumb and
the  solution  crumb  subcategories,  suspended  solids  are produced by
rubber crumb fines.  Gravity separation readily  reduces  these  solids.
Suspended  solids  ranging  rom  6.17  kg/kkg(lb/1000  Ib)  of production
(latex rubber)  to 2.81 kg/kkg(lb/1000 Ib)  of production (solution crumb)
are common in the raw waste water.

Suspended solids include both  organic  and  inorganic  materials.   The
inorganic components include sand, silt, and clay.  The organic fraction
includes  such materials as grease, oil, tar, animal and vegetable fats,
various fibers, sawdust, hair, and various materials from sewers.  These
solids may settle out rapidly and bottom deposits are often a mixture of
both organic and inorganic solids.  They adversely affect  fisheries  by
covering  the  bottom  of  the stream or lake with a blanket of material
that destroys the fish-food bottom fauna or the spawning ground of fish.
Deposits containing organic materials may deplete bottom oxygen supplies
and produce hydrogen sulfide, carbon dioxide, methane, and other noxious
gases.                        ,           :

In raw water sources for  domestic  use, ;state  and  regional  agencies
generally  specify that suspended solids in streams shall not be present
in sufficient concentration to be objectionable  or  to  interfere  with
normal  treatment  processes.   Suspended  solids in water may interfere
with many  industrial  processes, 'and  cause  foaming  in  boilers,  or
encrustations   on   equipment  exposed  to  water,  especially  as  the
temperature rises.   Suspended  solids  are  undesirable  in  water  for
textile   industries;   paper   and  pulp;  beverages;  dairy  products;
laundries; dyeing;  photography;  cooling  systems,  and  power  plants.
Suspended  particles  also serve as a transport mechanism for pesticides
and other  substances  which  are  readily  sorbed  into  or  onto  clay
particles.

Solids  may be suspended in water for a time, and then settle to the bed
of the stream or lake.  These settleable solids  discharged  with  man's
wastes   may  be  inert,  slowly  biodegradable  materials,  or  rapidly
decomposable  substances.   While  in  suspension,  they  increase   the
turbidity  of  the  water,  reduce  light  penetration  and  impair  the
photosynthetic activity of aquatic plants.

Solids in suspension are aesthetically displeasing.  When they settle to
form sludge deposits on the stream or lake bed, they are often much more
damaging to the life in water, and they retain the capacity to displease
the senses.  Solids, when transformed  to  sludge  deposits,  may  do   a
variety  of damaging things, including blanketing the stream or lake bed
and thereby destroying the living spaces  for  those  benthic  organisms
that  would  otherwise  occupy  the  habitat.   When  of  an organic and
therefore decomposable nature, solids  use  a  portion  or  all  of  the
dissolved oxygen available in the area.  Organic materials also serve as
a  seemingly  inexhaustible  food  source for sludgeworms and associated
organisms.
                                 75

-------
 Turbidity is principally a measure of the light absorbing properties  of
 suspended  solids.    It  is  frequently  used  as a substitute method of
 quickly estimating  the total suspended solids when the concentration  is
 relatively low.

 TgfcaLlDissolYed  Solids

 The  coagulation liquor  used  in  emulsion crumb production is  a  major
 contributor of total dissolved solids in emulsion crumb effluents.    The
 solution   crumb and  latex  subcategories   also  produce  waste  water
 containing appreciable amounts of total dissolved  solids.    Because  of
 the technical risk,  excessive costs and dubious benefits involved in the
 application  of  treatments systems for total dissolved solids removal in
 this industry, no limitations for total dissolved solids have been  set.

 In  natural waters the dissolved solids  consist  mainly  of   carbonates,
 chlorides,   sulfates,   phosphates,  and  possibly  nitrates   of calcium,
 magnesium,  sodium,  and potassium,  with traces  of  iron,   manganese   and
 other substances.

 Many  communities  in the  United states and  in  other countries use water
 supplies containing  2000 to 4000 mg/1 of dissolved salts,  when no better
 water is available,   such  waters  are  not   palatable,   may   not  quench
 thirst,   and may have a laxative action on new  users.   Waters containing
 more than 4000.mg/1  of total salts are generally  considered   unfit   for
 human  use,  although in hot climates  such higher salt  concentrations  can
 be  tolerated whereas they  could not be in temperate   climates.   Waters
 containing   5000  mg/1 or  more  are  reported   to be  bitter and act  as
 bladder  and  intestinal irritants,   it is generally agreed  that the   salt
 concentration of good,  palatable water should not exceed  500  mg/1.

 Limiting concentrations   of  dissolved  solids  for fresh-water fish may
 range from   5,000  to   10,000   mg/1,   according   to  species   and prior
 acclimatization.  Some fish are  adapted to living in more  saline  waters,
 and  a few species of  fresh-water forms have  been found  in natural waters
 with  a   salt concentration  of 15,000  to 20,000  mg/1.  Fish can slowly
 become acclimatized to higher  salinities, but  fish  in  waters   of  low
 salinity cannot  survive   sudden   exposure   to  high salinities,  such as
those resulting from discharges  of  oil-well   brines.   Dissolved  solids
 may  influence the toxicity  of  heavy metals and organic compounds to fish
 and   other aquatic life, primarily  because of the  antagonistic effect of
hardness  on metals.

Waters with total dissolved  solids  over  500 mg/1 have decreasing utility
 as irrigation water.  At 5,000 mg/1 water1 has little  or  no  value  for
irrigation.

Dissolved  solids  in industrial waters  can cause  foaming in boilers and
cause interference with cleaness,  color,  or  taste  of  many  finished
products.   High  contents   of  dissolved solids also tend to accelerate
corrosion.
                                 76

-------
Specific conductance is a measure of the capacity of water to convey  an
electric  current.   This property is related to the total concentration
of ionized substances in water and water temperature.  This property  is
frequently  used  as  a  substitute  method  of  quickly  estimating the
dissolved solids concentration.

Oiland Grease

Insoluble monomers, solvents and extender oils  are  used  by  two  sub-
categories,  emulsion  and solution crumb rubber.  Latex productipn also
utilizes  the  same  insoluble  monomer.   In  addition,   miscellaneous
machinery  and  hydraulic  oils  are  used.   Moreover,  genuine oil and
grease, measured by solvent extraction  (generally carbon  tetrachloride)
analytical  methods,  are  present  in  the  raw waste waters from these
plants.  Oil and grease entering the waste water are treated for removal
by chemical coagulation and clarification, air flotation  clarification,
gravity settling, and, to some degree, by biological oxidation.

Oil  and  grease  exhibit an oxygen demand.  Oil emulsions may adhere to
the gills  of  fish  or  coat  and  destroy  algae  or  other  plankton.
Deposition  of  oil  in the bottom sediments can serve to exhibit normal
benthic growths, thus interrupting the aquatic food chain.  Soluble  and
emulsified  material  ingested  by fish may taint the flavor of the fish
flesh.  Water  soluble  components  may  exert  toxic  action  on  fish.
Floating  oil  may  reduce  the  re-aeration of the water surface and in
conjunction with  emulsified  oil  may  interfere  with  photosynthesis.
Water insoluble components damage the plumage and costs of water animals
and  fowls.   Oil  and  grease in a water can result in the formation of
objectionable surface slicks preventing the full aesthetic enjoyment  of
the water.

Oil spills can damage the surface of boats and can destroy the aesthetic
characteristics of beaches and shorelines.
                                  77

-------
 £H, Acidity/Alkalinity

 Since  neutralization  is practiced prior to biological treatment at all
 synthetic rubber plant waste  water  treatment  facilities,  extreme  pH
 variations outside the range pH 6.0 to 9.0 are not foreseen.

 Acidic  coagulation  liquors  are  used and discharged in emulsion crumb
 production, and strong  caustic  soda  solutions  are  bled  into  plant
 effluents  where  monomer  inhibitors  are  removed.  Incidentally,  this
 latter flow  is  extremely  low  and  does  not  constitute  a  problem.
 However,  neutralization  is  carried  out in all industry subcategories
 prior to biological treatment systems, and,  therefore,  treated  wastes
 will have little residual acidity or alkalinity.

 Acidity  and  alkalinity  are  reciprocal terms.  Acidity is produced by
 substances that yield 'hydrogen ions upon hydrolysis  and  alkalinity  is
 produced  by  substances  that  yield  hydroxyl  ions.   The terms "total
 acidity" and "total alkalinity" are often used to express the  buffering
 capacity  of  a solution.   Acidity in natural waters is caused by carbon
 dioxide, mineral acids,  weakly  dissociated  acids,  and  the  salts  of
 strong  acids  and weak  bases.   Alkalinity is caused by strong bases and
 the salts of strong alkalies and weak acids.

 The term pH is a logarithmic expression of the concentration of hydrogen
 ions.   At a pH of 7,  the hydrogen and hydroxyl  ion  concentrations   are
 essentially  equal  and   the water is neutral.   Lower pH values 'indicate
 acidity while  higher values  indicate  alkalinity.    The  relationship
 between  pH  and  acidity  or  alkalinity  is  not necessarily linear or
 direct.

 Waters with a pH below 6.0  are   corrosive  to  water works   structures,
 distribution  lines,   and   household  plumbing fixtures and  can thus add
 such constituents to  drinking water as iron,  copper,  zinc,   cadmium   and
 lead.    The  hydrogen ion   concentration  can affect the "taste"  of the
 water.   At a low pH water tastes  "sour".    The   bactericidal   effect  of
 chlorine is weakened  as  the pH  increases,  and it is advantageous to  keep
 the pH close to 7.  This is very  significant  for providing safe drinkinq
 water.                                                                 y

 Extremes   of   pH  or rapid pH changes  can  exert  stress conditions or  kill
 aquatic  life  outright.   Dead fish,  associated   algal  blooms,   and   foul
 stenches   are   aesthetic  liabilities  of   any   waterway.  Even moderate
 changes from  "acceptable" criteria  limits  of  pH  are deleterious to   some
 species.    The  relative  toxicity  to aquatic  life of  many materials is
 increased by changes  in  the  water   pH.    Metalocyanide   complexes  can
 increase   a thousand-fold  in toxicity with a drop  of 1.5  pH units.  The
 availability of many nutrient substances varies  with the alkalinity  and
 acidity.  Ammonia is more lethal with  a higher pH.

 The_ lacrimal  fluid of the human eye has a pH of approximately 7.0 and a
 deviation of 0.1 pH unit from the norm may result in eye irritation  for
the swimmer.  Appreciable irritation will cause  severe pain.
                                  78

-------
Surfactants

Surfactants  are  used in all the industry subcategories; however, their
concentrations in the raw waste load is very low and is further  reduced
after  biological treatment.  Surfactants are the primary cause of foamy
plant effluents, but it is difficult to relate surfactant effluent  con-
centration  to  visual  foaming  problems.   Therefore,  limitations for
surfactants in effluents having foaming  problems  should  be  based  on
local  aesthetic  requirements,  individual  plant  location, and stream
quality criteria for the receiving body of water.

color

Color is objectionable form an aesthetic standpoint and also because  it
interferes  with  the  transmission  of  sunlight  into streams, thereby
lessening photosynthetic activity.   Some  waste  streams  in  synthetic
rubber  plants,  such as spent caustic scrub discharges and carbon black
rubber rinse waters, have appreciable color.   However,  after  dilution
with  the  combined plant total effluent and after undergoing biological
treatment, there is no discernible color iin synthetic rubber  plant  ef-
fluents.

Temperature  (Heat)

In  synthetic  rubber  plants  there are 'individual waste water streams,
such as condenser flows and crumb  slurry  overflows,  which  have  high
temperatures.   However,  after combination with other effluent streams,
equalization and biological treatment, thermal equilibrium with  ambient
temperature  is  approached.   Consequently, a temperature parameter for
the  final  effluent  is  not  considered  significant  or  subject   to
limitations.

Temperature  is  one of the most important and influential water quality
characteristics.  Temperature  determines  those  species  that  may  be
present;  it  activates the hatching of young, regulates their activity,
and stimulates or suppresses their growth and development; it  attracts,
and  may  kill  when  the  water  becomes too hot or becomes chilled too
suddenly.  Colder water generally suppresses development.  Warmer  water
generally  accelerates  activity  and  may be a primary cause of aquatic
plant nuisances when other environmental  factors are suitable.

Temperature is a prime regulator of natural processes within  the  water
environment.   It  governs  physiological, functions  in  organisms and,
acting directly or indirectly  in combination with  other  water  quality
constituents,  it  affects aquatic life with each change.  These effects
include  chemical  reaction  rates,   enzymatic   functions,   molecular
movements,  and molecular exchanges between membranes within and between
the physiological systems and  the organs:of an animal.

Chemical reaction rates vary with temperature and generally increase  as
the  temperature  is increased.  The solubility of gases in water varies
with temperature.   Dissolved  oxygen
decomposition  of  dissolved   organic
is  decreased  by  the  decay  or
substances  and  the  decay  rate
                                79

-------
 increases as the temperature of the water increases reaching  a  maximum
 at  about  30°C  (86°F).    The  temperature of stream water, even during
 summer,  is  below  the  optimum  for   pollution-associated   bacteria.
 Increasing  the water temperature increases the bacterial multiplication
 rate when the environment is favorable and the food supply is abundant.

 Reproduction  cycles  may  be   changed   significantly   by   increased
 temperature   because   this   function  takes  place  under  restricted
 temperature ranges.   Spawning may not occur at all because  temperatures
 are  too  high.  Thus, a  fish population may exist in a headed area only
 by  continued  immigration.    Disregarding  the  decreased  reproductive
 potential,  water temperatures need not reach lethal levels to decimate a
 species.   Temperatures that favor competitors, predators, parasites,  and
 disease can destroy  a species at levels far below those that are lethal.
 Fish  food
 exceed 90°F.
 decreased,
 drastically
 may   cause
 favorable.
organisms are altered severely when temperatures approach or
  Predominant algal species change,  primary  production  is
and  bottom  associated organisms may be depleted or altered
in numbers and distribution.  Increased  water  temperatures
aquatic plant nuisances when other environmental factors are
Synergistic actions  of   pollutants   are   more   severe   at   higher  water
temperatures.    Given amounts  of  domestic sewage, refinery  wastes, oils,
tars,  insecticides,  detergents, and   fertilizers  more   rapidly  deplete
oxygen in  water  at higher temperatures,  and  the respective toxicities
are  likewise increased.

When water temperatures  increase,  the  predominant  algal   species  may
change from diatoms to  green  algae,  and  finally at high temperatures to
blue-green algae, because of species temperature  preferentials.   Blue-
green^  algae    can   cause  serious odor  problems.    The number  and
distribution  of benthic  organisms decreases as  water   temperatures
increase  above  90°F,   which  is  close  to the tolerance  limit for the
population.  This could  seriously affect  certain  fish   that depend  on
benthinc organisms as a  food source.

The  cost of fish, being attracted to  heated water in winter  months may be
considerable,  due   to   fish   mortalities  that may result  when the fish
return to the cooler water.

Rising temperatures  stimulate  the decomposition of sludge,'formation  of
sludge  gas,    multiplication  of   saprophytic   bacteria  and  fungi
(particularly in the presence  of organic wastes), and the consumption of
oxygen by putrefactive processes, thus affecting the esthetic value of a
water  course.

In general, marine water temperatures do not change as rapidly or  range
as  widely  as   those  of  freshwaters.   Marine  and  estuarine fishes,
therefore, are less tolerant of temperature  variation.   Although  this
limited  tolerance  is  greater  in  estuarine than in open water marine
species, temperature changes are  more  important  to  those  fishes  in
estuaries  and   bays  than to those in open marine areas, because of the
                                80

-------
nursery and replenishment functions of the estuary that can be adversely
affected by extreme temperature changes.

Summary of Significant Pollutants

Although the pollutants represented by the previously mentioned list  of
parameters  will  occur in synthetic rubber production, only five should
be monitored to insure that pollutant levels  are  minimized  and  gross
discharge prevented.  These are:

    COD
    BOD
    Suspended Solids
    Oil and Grease                        <
    pH                                  •  i
                                 81

-------

-------
                              SECTION VII

                    CONTROL AND TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Survey of Selected Plants

General ABBroach and Summary

In order to review and fully evaluate the waste water control and treat-
ment  technologies  used  in  the  rubber  processing industry, selected
plants were visited to conduct  operation  analyses,  review  water  and
waste  water  management  programs,  and  evaluate waste water treatment
facilities.  The plants were selected as being exemplary or advanced  in
their  waste water control and treatment technologies, based on effluent
and treatment data from the technical literature, EPA  documents.  Corps
of  Engineers  Permit  to Discharge Applications, and individual company
treatment data.

Plants producing passenger tires   (both  bias  and  radial  ply),  truck
tires,  camelback, and inner tubes were visited and studied to determine
if the type of product affected the quality and quantity of waste  water
streams  and/or  the  control  and  treatment technology employed.  Both
singleproduct and multiproduct plants were included so that the  effects
of  combined  lines  on  the  plant  waste  waters  could  be evaluated;
likewise, plants of various sizes were studied to determine  the  impact
of   production   levels.    Age   was  a  major  consideration  because
determination of the effect, if any, of newer processing technology  and
machinery  on the control and treatability of process waste streams, was
one of the principal objectives  of  the  investigative  phase  of  this
project.   Table  16  is  a  summary  of  the products manufactured, raw
material  usage,  and  wastewater  control  and  treatment  technologies
utilized at the tire and inner tube plants visited.

In  the  synthetic  rubber production segment of the  industry,  the field
visits included plants employing emulsion  and   solution  polymerization
processing methods and involving all types of synthetic rubber  products:
"cold  crumb",  "hot  crumb",  non-extended, oil-extended,  carbon-black-
extended,  and  latex rubbers.  As in the  tire and inner tube  segment, the
effects of single- and multi-product lines, plant size, and  plant  age  on
waste water volume and characteristics and related  control  and treatment
technology were   evaluated.   A  summary of  the   products,   processes,
production  capacities,    and   waste   water   control  and   treatment
technologies   of  the  exemplary   synthetic  rubber  plants  visited   is
presented  in Table  17.

Tire  and  Inner Tube Plants

Plant_A

This   plant,   built  in  1961  and  located  in an  arid  rural  community,  pro-
duces passenger tires,  small-implement tires,  and  front   tractor  tires.
 Production  rate for  passenger tires  at  the  time of the  visit was 12,000
                                  83

-------
                      o.
                      w
                                                                3 u.

                                                                u) *J
                                                                                                 «  1
                                                                                                    S<0
                                                                                                 L.  £
                      i-  c at

                      J.2g
                      O  4J 4J
                      «  ffl W
                      •••  O) (5
                                  t 4J .-      .- ._
                                                   2 S u.
       C  4J
       10  C
       —  U
       O.  3
       f   S S
              8§

             •O Ol
              U rg
             V) —I
                                                          CO l/l
                                                            (U
                                                          cnm
       0)
       U

      JZ
      I
tt    H
      u

      I



      1     o
   0) >•
   C 4-1
   o i.
  o •—

  si

             O  O 4-
             to o
             O 4J
            to re
             o    re at


            ~ >0** >.
               3-D  (U 4J
               «  01 L.

            •- £  2 a

            S^Sc
            o: m i/i .-
52**
   O  «
*— 4J re
 re (D 0) (D
 o i- i_ e
 o ro <: o
-J Q.   *J
   fl) 0) tf)
 re •—  o.
 u >  nj u-
Q 0)  O O
                                                             J2 ».59
                                                                                     w --
                                                                                     Q..-

                                                                                     CD O
    ID
    0)

 g<
 O  0)
 4-1  Dl
 g.2
 S2
CO CO




II
             —  Q.      — •
                                                                                     2 "
                                                                                     o §•;
                                                                                     0) 5  i
13

g

     §    .2
 a) e u    o ._
 en ej }-    en i-
 C g      C 4J
 U « 4-1    « tfl
 « ^- c    tn D
 w Q. o    « -a
 *o E u    re c
a. — u.   a. —
                                                                                                          1-



                                                                                                          I
                                                          84

-------
4-1
C
Q)
3

4-
14-
tu

£•
TO
•u


u
0)
to
(D
O)
C

i—
4-*
4-1
0)


4-1
C
i
•P
(D
(U
t-
t-
C
O
4->
(D
L.
O
<
8
en
ID
_i

§

4-1
10
N


_Q
ID
4-<
t/)
<
•a
c
ID

C
0
o
O)
ID
_J
T3
a)
4-1
ID
U
D
<
>»
u
ID
•o
C

9>
to

§
*4J
ID
4-1
O

U.





C
O

4-)
ID
O
H-

L-
ID

CJ
T3
C
ID

C
O
o
Dl
ID
_l
C
o
4J
ra
i.
a)
<
to
•a
c
o
a.

c
O

4-1
ID
N
^Z

ja
ID
4-1
to
                                                                                        0)
                                                                                        01
                                                                                       •o
                                                                                        3
vated
zat
tab
udge
vated
Ac
                                                                                            ID
                                                                                            a. +-»
                                                                                           — c
                                                                                            O ID

                                                                                           'c ol


                                                                                           = £
                                                                                            to a>

                                                                                            O B
                                                                                            4J ID
                                                                                               0)
                                                                                            a) i-

                                                                                            s11-
                                                                                            ID 1)

                                                                                           •g S1

                                                                                            «g
                                                                                            o to
ubbe
       4-1
        C
        ro
op
 oi c
 ID  o
 o —
O  4->
    ID
—  O
 ID —
 O >t-
 01  ID
j: •—
o o
                                       U  (0


                                       < 0
                                                    wo
                                                    ID C
                                                    0 0
                                                    o a.
                                                                                                        01 c
                                                                                                        ID  o
                                                                                                        o —
                                                                                                       o  4-1
                                                                                                           ID
                                                                                                       —  o
                                                                                                        ID —
                                                                                                        o ^-

                                                                                                       'i 'u
                                                                                                        O  ID
        ID

        a
JB     o
        I
                                       o
                                       _Q
                                 3
                              !„ p—
                             o in
                                            .
                                       •i  t
                       0.


                       J3

                        E
                        Z)
                        u

                       0
                                             I   41     —
                                            1)  O  4-1 O
                                            a  o  —
                                                U'O. T3

                                            u     u a)
                                            O  01— —
                                                C  4-) CO
                                             «•—  I/)
                                            4-1  N  3 3
                                            .— ._  ID O
                                            a.  4-1  o —
                                                c     to  o
                                            _Q  0)  4-»     D)
                                            E  >  c jr  u
                                            3 —  (U +J  ID
                                            u  o  a.-- .c
                                            o  1/1  to 3  o
                                                                      1
          — a.
          CL.
           ^  >-
          ja  i-
              §u
              3
           U •—
          o to
                                                                                                                11
                                                                                                                                         o
                                                                                                                                         O-
        •a
         c
         ID
 So'
•g  gj
 u  SP
a.  o
 ID


£
 c
 o
 4-J
     O O
 u   o o
—   00
                                                    0000
                                                    o  o o o
                                                    o  r-.o o
                                        o
                                        o
                                        o
                                       o  o
                                       fO O
                                       T-  CM
                        o C»MN  o    in
                        CM    un—    oo
oo    ooo     oo    o
oo    ooo     oo    o
oo    ooo     oo    o

ino    \OOLTV    com    i-
^D  »-    LTl LT\ CM     •-       CM
                                        C. C
                                        o o
                                       'o I
                        c  c  c  c
                        o  o  o  o

                                                            o  o
                                                     LU UJ IO  t/}
                                                                       c  c
                                                                       o  o
                                                                           §  §  §
                                                                       O  O  O
                                                                      to to  to
                        c  c
                        o  o
                                        1
                                                         O  c£ Q:    CiC
                                                        jC  CO CO    CD
                                                            a. to    CL
                                                     LJ O  O O
                                                            -II
                                                                                               C£ <£.
                                                                                               m co
                                                                                               to -z.

                                                                                               x x
                                                                                               a) 9)
                                                                                               4J 4->
                                                                                               ID ID
                                                                     85

-------
 units per day.  in addition to the normal tire processing and production
 lines, this plant  has  a  latex  fabric-dip  operation.   Raw  material
 consumption was over 120,000 kg  (264,000 Ibs) per day.

 The_ actual  production facility occupies approximately 16 ha (UC ac)  of
 land.  The plant boundaries surround another 140 ha   (350  ac)  of  land
 currently devoted to agricultural use.

 The  only  source  of  raw  water  supply is well water.  It is used for
 cooling, steam generation, domestic use, and all other plant needs.

 The principal process waste waters from this plant are water  and  steam
 leakages,  and  wash  waters  from the cleaning of equipment and general
 work areas.   Water leakage  occurs  at  various  water-cooled  machinery
 units,  including  mills,   Banburys,  tread extruders, and tread-cooling
 tanks,  in addition, water can escape from the  hydraulic  water  system
 used  in  the  Banbury  and  press  areas.   Water and steam occur in the
 process waste water in the press area as the result of broken  seals  or
 failing  bladder bags.   Oil and solid matter which have collected on the
 floors are carried along by these various water streams  into  the  area
 drainage system.   The oil  is lubrication oil which has dripped or leaked
 from oil seals on mills, pumps and like equipment, from open gears, from
 gear  boxes,   and  from the hydraulic water system.   Additional oil and
 solid materials result from leakage at the Banbury dust and oil  rings.

 Daily washdowns include steam and solvent cleaning of  the  tread  books
 and  miscellaneous  machinery  parts  and  the cleaning of the latex dip
 tank.   Weekly cleanups, which  occur  on  the  weekends  (non-production
 days),  include washdown of the steel grates in the soapstone area.

 This  plant   was   specially laid out and engineered so as  to keep spills
 and leakages  from becoming a problem.   Drains are  non-existent   in the
 soapstone area  and  in many of the mill areas.   Removable steel grates
 have been provided in the  soapstone dip area so that   spilled  soapstone
 solution  will not  create  a  work hazard.   Housekeeping practices and
 schedules have been set up to keep leaks and spills of  lubricating oil
 on   the floors of the plant to a minimum.   When steam and  water  leakages
 do  occur,  they are directed (along with  other  process and   nonprocess
 wastes)   to a  collection pond.   Equipment-cleaning waste waters  ar«* also
 discharged to  this pond.

 The principal  nonprocess  waste   waters  are   boiler   and   cooling  pond
 blowdowns.   In  addition,  there  is  a hot-water-sump  overflow.   The hot-
 water sump is  used as a collection   point   for  recycled  press   cooling
 water.   Contaminants  in these  wastes are suspended and dissolved solids.

 End-of-pipe  treatment  at  this plant includes pH  control and  the lagoon-
 ing of all effluents, both process and  nonprocess.    The  waste  waters,
 after  pH  adjustment,  are directed to  the  11,000  cubic  meter (3 million
 gallon) collection  and  storage pond.  The residence time in this pond is
 approximately  four  days.   Settling of suspended solids and the reduction
of  both COD and oil occur  during this period of time.    From  here,  the
waste  waters   are  fed  to  a  second   pond.   Water  leaving the second
                                 86

-------
retention pond can be used for any of three functions.  It can  be  used
for  irrigation  on the company-owned farm acreage around the production
facility (its primary function), it can evaporate, or it  can  percolate
into the sandy ground below the pond.   (The water table at this plant is
approximately 76 meters (250 feet)  below the surface.)

In  addition  to containment of all process and nonprocess waste waters,
all storm runoff from within and around the plant confines  is  directed
to and contained in these lagoons.

Plant B

This  plant, located in a rural area, started operating in 1964.  Plant-
owned ground is now almost entirely utilized  by  processing  and  ware-
housing buildings, parking lots, and waste water treatment facilities.
The  facility  produces  passenger  tires
Production 'rates are currently running at
off-the-road tires per day.
and heavy off-the-road tires.
24,000  passenger  and  2,OCO
Water  for  all  plant  uses,  including  makeup for the cooling towers,
boiler and various dipping solutions, is supplied by the municipality.

The principal process waste waters from this plant are:  water and steam
leakages, runoff from the process oil storage area, and discharges  from
wet air-pollution control equipment.

Water  and steam leakages occur in the press room of both the passenger-
tire and truck-tire facilities.  These streams become contaminated  with
oil  scavenged  off  machinery parts and the floor.  Runoff from the oil
storage area is continuous due to the placement of a steam blowdown pipe
nearby; oil is scavenged from the area and becomes  entrained  with  the
condensate waste water stream.                                     _

Wet  scrubbers  are  used  to control air emissions from the compounding
area and  from  the  green  tire  painting  area.   Collectively,  these
scrubbers   represent   the  largest  single  discharge  in  the  plant.
Contaminants include COD and suspended  solids,  as  well  as  .some  oil
matter.

Maintenance  and  housekeeping  practices  at this plant are directed at
keeping leakage at a  minimum  and  well  contained.   Runoff  from  the
process  oil-storage  areas  is  pretreated  in  a baffled oil separator
chamber before flowing to the  end-of-pipe  treatment  facilities.   The
separator unit effectively removes oil from the small volume of water in
the influent.

T7ater  discharged  from  air pollution equipment passes into the plant's
endof-pipe treatment facility untreated.

The principal nonproces.s waste waters are boiler and cooling tower blow-
downs, and water treatment wastes; these are segregated from the process
                                 87

-------
 waste waters and are discharged, without subsequent treatment, into
 storm drainage system.
the
 In  addition,  there  are  blowdowns from various presses throughout the
 plant; these contain COD, suspended solids, and dissolved solids.

 End-of-pipe treatment at this plant involves the  use  of  two  lagoons.
 The  wet scrubbers and steam blowdowns flow into the first lagoon, which
 xs used to separate settleable solids and separable oil.  This pond  has
 a  surface  area  of 0.21 ha (0.52 ac)  and a baffled effluent weir.  Wet
 scrubbers, and some  once-through  cooling  water  flow  to  th<=>  second
 lagoon.  This has approximately 0.30 ha (0.74 ac)  of surface area and is
 also used to remove separable solids and oil from the influent.

 Plant c
         ™a   ffciiity  consists of two Plants, the older of the two
 dating from 1945 and the newer one coming  on  stream  within  the  last
 decade.    The  facility  is  located  in  an  industrialized area on the
 fringes of  an  urban  center.   Most  of  the  land  within  the  plant
 boundaries  is  occupied  by  production  buildings and by the necessary
 auxiliary buildings, waste treatment facilities,  and parking areas.   The
 tacility produces only passenger tires (both bias ply and radial) .   *?-*
 material consumption is approximately 349,000 kilograms (770,000 pounds)
 per  day.    Exact unit production rates are unknown, although the figure
 is known to be well above 20,000 units per day.

 The principal  process  waste  waters  are  water  and  steam  leakages.
 overflow  from  various sumps, and runoff from oil storage areas.   Water-
 leakages occur throughout  the  plant  wherever  there  is  water-cooled
 machinery,   such  as mills and Banburys.   Water and steam leakages ocrur
 in the press area due  to  leaking  seals,   failing  bladder  bags,   and
 leakages  in  the  hydraulic  water  system.    The  process waste  waters
 scavenge oil and solid materials,  which flow to the nearest drain.    oil
 and  solid  material accumulate on  the floor and in the various machinery
 basins due  to dripping and leaks from the Banbury dust rings,   mill   and
 pump oil seals,  open gears,  and the hydrualic water system.   Runoff  from
 oil storage^ areas occurs during rainstorms  and washdowns,  and is another
 source of oily process waste water.
      Plant at one time had a process waste water discharge of soapstone
solution.  After extensive studies  showed  that  this  solution  caused
excessive  BOD  and  total solids in the waste water, this discharge was
eliminated.  The current practice is to recycle this solution.

Wastewater streams resulting from the use  of  other  solutions  in  the
plant,  such as the latex dip, have also been eliminated.  These streams
are dumped into a sump, which is periodically  emptied  into  drums  and
sent to a landfill site.

The principal nonprocess waste waters are boiler and cooling tow<=>r blow-
down,  once-through tread cooling water, and water treatment wastes.  In
                                 88

-------
all cases, dissolved solids are a problem, and suspended solids will  be
a problem in -the water treatment waste and boiler blowdown.

Process  waste  waters  and  all  the  nonprocess  waste water (with the
exception of boiler blowdown}   are  combined  and  then  directed  to  a
primary  treatment  facility.    This  treatment facility consists of two
settling basins, operating in parallel.  Each provides 24 hour retention
for the waste  streams.   Settleable  solids  are  removed  periodically
(approximately  every  two years) , and floating oil is removed by a belt
filter.  Boiler blowdown and sanitary wastes are treated  in  a  package
extended  aeration  sanitary  wastewater  treatment  plant.  All treated
waste waters are discharged to the river.
This plant, started up in the early 1940' s,  is  located  in  an  urban,
industrialized area.  It has recently undergone extensive modifications,
and,  therefore,  production  levels are not well established.  However,
past data indicate that the plant is producing 22,000 passenger,  truck,
and  tractor  tires  per  day.   The plant also produces camelback.  Raw
material consumption is in the neighborhood of 840,000  kilograms   (1.85
million pounds) per day.

Raw  water  is  supplied by the municipality and from company- owned _ deep
wells.  The city water is used to supply domestic  and  air  conditioner
cooling  needs.   The  wells  supply once-through cooling water, cooling
tower makeup, boiler feed water, and processing solution makeup.

The principal process waste  waters  from  this  plant  include:   water
leakages,   steam   leakages,   a   weekly  washdown  of  the   soapstone
recirculation system, equipment and floor cleaning washdowns, and  minor
runoff from the oil storage area.

Water leakages arise from the oil seals  and open gears  on mill  calendars
and  pumps  and from the hydraulic water system used in the Banburys and
presses.  Steam leakages occur in the press room from broken or leaking
seals and failing bladder bags.  Both types of leakage  are heavily laden
with  oil  picked  up  from the seals and from lubricating oil drippings.
The soapstone recirculation system is cleaned out once  a week,  and  the
effluent  has  high  BOD  and suspended  solids loadings.  The floors are
cleaned with an automatic sweeper that uses a soapy water solution as   a
cleaning  agent.   Drainage   from  this , sytem  also  has a high BOD and
suspended solids loadings.  Steam cleaning is used for  small   machinery
parts, and the discharges are significantly contaminated with oil.

Water  and steam leaks  in the press area are pumped to  an oil separator,
where the  floating  oil  is  removed  an  disposed  of by   an outside
contractor.    Water  leakages  in the mill area are kept at a minimum  by
careful housekeeping and maintenance practices, and do  not appear  to   be
a serious  problem.  Runoff  from  oil storage areas is collected  in  sumps,
which are  pumped out on an  "as required" basis.
                                  89

-------
 Floor-cleaning  machinery
 into the sanitary sewer.
discharges and steam-cleaning discharges flow
 The principal nonprocess waste waters are boiler and cooling tower blow-
 downs,  water treatment wastes, and once-through cooling water.    In  the
 first  three  cases,  dissolved  solids  constitute  a  problem.   Boiler
 blowdowns  and  water   treatment   wastes   may   also   contain   high
 concentrations  of  suspended solids, depending on the treatment  process
 being used.   COD and pH may also be problems.

 Ther is no end-of-pipe waste water treatment facility which  covers  the
 entire   process waste water stream.   Some nonprocess waste water  and the
 weekly  dump of the soapstone slurry are directed to a holding basin  for
 removal of settleable solids before discharge.
 This   facility  which  was   started  up  in 1920,  is  a  sprawling complex
 occupying  25  major buildings and more than 74  acres of  ground.   Although
 it  is  located in a very congested urban area,  the  plant  boundaries   en-
 close  approximately 13  acres of  open ground.

 The plant  was originally set up  to produce many  rubber  products,  includ-
 ing tires,   belting, an inner tubes.   However,  with  the  passage of time
 and because of specialization, production of all  rubber   products  with
 the exception of tires  has been  discontinued,  current  production levels
 are 10,400 passenger tires per day and 4,400 truck tires  per day.  Total
 raw material  consumption is  210,160 kilograms  (462,900  pounds) per day.

 Production facilities  are located in three' buildings.  The Banburys  and
 mills  of the  compounding operation and the presses of  the  molding   and
 curing operations  are located  in separate buildings (Banbury and Press
 Buildings).   The mills,  extruders,  calendars,  etc. of the tread  and bead
 formation  lines  and of  the fabric-coating operations  are  all located  in
 a   large building (Rubber Mill Building)  located between  the compounding
 and curing buildings.    The buildings  are   interconnected  so  as  to
 approximate   a  continuous   production  line.  Fabric is  shipped  to this
 plant  pretreated,  and no additional dipping operations  are preformed.

 The plant  has  two separate sources  of  raw water  supply:   well water   and
 municipally   supplied   water.    The well  water  is  used primarily  for
 cooling tower  makeup, and the municipal  (city)  water  is used  as  boiler
 makeup,  after  treatment.   The   city water  is also used in making  the
 soapstone  and  other solutions used  in  tire  manufacture.

 The principal  process waste  waters  include  water  and  steam  leakages,
 steam  cleaning,   and  wet   air-pollution  equipment  discharges.  Water
 leakages arise from water-cooled machinery,  such  as  mills,  Banburys,
 tread  extruders,  and tread cooling tanks.   In addition, water can escape
 from   the  hydraulic  water  system used  in the  Banbury and press areas.
Water  and  steam  leakages  occur in the  press building  due to broken seals
 and failing bladder bags.  These waste water streams  are  heavily  laden
with   oil  picked  up   from  the  seals and from floor areas and basins.
                                  90

-------
Machinery parts such as gears and bearings are cleaned wi-fch  steam,  and
the  resulting  wastes contains both oil and suspended solids.  Grinding
operations  within  the  plant  are  equipped   with   wet   particulate
collectors.   Effluents  from  these  collectors are small in volume but
contain a high concentration of heavy rubber  as  suspended  particules.
Zinc and chromium are used as corrosion inhibitors and will therefore be
present in the collector discharge.

Leakages,  both steam and water, are collected in two sumps, one located
in the press building and the other in the rubber mill building.   These
sumps  separate  the  oil,  and the resulting underflow is released to a
sanitary 'sewer.  Sanitary sewers within the plant are connected  to  the
municipal  sanitary  sewer system and eventually to the municipal waste-
water treatment plant.  Oil from the sump  is  removed  periodically  by
maintenance personnel.

Steam cleaning of machinery parts is carried out in a non-congested out-
door  area  of  the  plant.   curbing  and concrete flooring are used to
direct the waste waters into three small  basins  connected  in  series.
The  area  is  supplied with a roof to prevent storm water from diluting
the wash water and upsetting the settling operation.  Storm runoff  from
this  area  is  directed into the storm-water catch basins.  These catch
basins act as  gravity  separators,  allowing  the  separable  suspended
solids to settle out and oil to float to' the surface.  The effluent from
the  basin  discharges  into  the  sanitary  sewer.   Solids and oil are
removed from these basins periodically.

The effluent from the wet particulate collectors flows  into  a  set  of
similar  settling basins, where most of the solids are settled out.  The
effluent then discharges into the  sanitary  sewer.   These  basins  are
equipped with automatic solids-removal equipment.

All . solids  and  oil  removed from the various treatment facilities are
containerized and disposed of by contract hauler to a landfill.

The principal nonprocess waste waters are boiler and cooling tower blow-
downs, and water treatment wastes.  In all cases, dissolved  solids  are
present  in  the  waste water, generally at high concentrations.  Boiler
blowdowns and water treatment wastes also contain high concentrations of
suspended solids.  The water makeup for the cooling tower which supplies
cooling water  to  the  press  building ', is  treated  with  a  corrosion
inhibitor  containing chromium and zinc, and these metals are present in
the blowdowns.

At this plant, there is no end-of-pipe treatment facility.  All  contam-
inated  process  and  nonprocess waste waters  (with the exception of the
main cooling tower) are discharged to a municipal treatment facility.

Plant F

This production facility, built in 1928, is located  in  a  minor  urban
area,  on  a large  (more  than  280 hectacres  (700 acres)) plot of ground.
                                 91

-------
 of  which  the  actual  production  facility  occupies  only   a
 proportion.                                                *
small
 Production  lines  include  passenger  tires,  truck tires, inner tubes,
 flaps, bladders, and camelback.  The plant, as  currently  designed,  is
 divided  up  into  separate product unit buildings for each end product.
 Daily production rates are currently running  at  40,000  passenger  and
 truck  tires,  36,000 inner tubes, 13,000 bladders and flaps, and 27,000
 kilograms (60,000 pounds)  of camelback.  Daily raw material  consumption
 is  681,000  kilograms  (1.5 million 'pounds).  This plant utilizes river
 water for production and utility purposes and city  water  for  domestic
 purposes.

 The  principal  process waste waters from this plant include:  water and
 steam leakages and overflows, runoff  from  process  oil-storage  areas,
 soapstone  solution spillages, and wash downs and runoff from process or
 storage areas.

 Water leakages occur at various water-colled machinery units,  including
 mills, Banburys,  tread extruders,  and tread cooling tanks.   In addition,
 water can escape from the  hydraulic water system used in the Banbury and
 press  areas.    Water  and steam leakages occur in the press area due to
 broken seals,  failing bladder bags, and overflows  from  the  collection
 pumps.   oil  and  solid  matter  which  have collected on  the floor are
 scavenged by these various water streams and are  carried  untreated  to
 the  drainage  system.   Oil on the floor spaces is lubricating oil which
 ha stripped   or  leaked from  oil  seals  on  mills,   pumps,  and  like
 equipment,  from open gears,  from gear boxes and from the hydraulic water
 system.    Oil  and  solid   materials result from leakages at the Banbury
 dust  and oil rings.                                 ,                   •*

 Soapstone solution which has  spilled and dripped on the floor is  washed
 down   periodically  and enters the drainage system untreated.   Typical
 contaminants are  BOD,  suspended solids,  and dissolved solids.

 Washdown water and storm runoff are allowed to drain through the process
 oil-storage  area,  where oil is scavenged and   carried   to  the   drainage
 system.    Before   discharge to the sewer, this stream is pretreated  in a
 baffled  sump,  where  oil is  separated,  removed  by  a  belt   filter,   and
 disposed  of  at  a sanitary landfill.  The  sump is  baffled,  but  provides
 no excess capacity for  oil  separation  during  a storm runoff.

 The aforementioned process waste waters  are mixed with nonprocess waste-
 waters in the  drainage  system.   The   nonprocess  waste  waters  include
 oncethrough  river water, boiler blowdown,  and a  small  overflow  from the
 numerous  small  pump  sumps located  throughout  the  plant.

 End-of-pipe  treatment facilities consist of a  two-stage  detention basin.
 The primary  facilities  provide  approximately   2,000  square  meters  for
 bottom and  surface removal of separable materials.   During dry-weather
 flow the  surface loading is 49,000  L/day/sq   m   (1,200  gal/day/sq  ft)
which  is  too  high  for  effective  treatment  of  waste water of this
 character.   It is  estimated that the facilities  provide  little  or  no
                                  92

-------
treatment  whatsoever during periods of significant runoff.  The primary
facilities are followed in series by a pond baffled down the  middle  to
retain  floatable  materials.   Some additional settleable materials are
also contained, but no facilities are provided for removal of  floatable
or settleable materials except on "as required" basis.

The secondary pond provides a theoretical detention time of twelve hours
during  dry-weather  flow.   However,  this  is significantly reduced by
short circuiting attributable to the location of the  inlet  and  outlet
connections.   Surface  loading  on this pond is adequate for removal of
separable materials during dry-weather flow  as  well  as  during  storm
weather  runoff conditions.  However, the surface of the pond is subject
to wind turbulence, which may remix the separated floatable materials.

Plan£_G

This  production  facility,  built  in  1928  is  located  in  a  highly
congested,  highly  industrialized  suburban area.  Built and originally
operated by another company, it was bought by the  current  operator  in
the  1930's  and  converted  to tire manufacture.  The facility produces
passenger and truck tires.  Daily production rates are currently running
at   18,300  passenger  tires  and   1,150  truck  tires.   Raw   material
consumption is over 246,000 kilograms  (541,000 pounds) per day.

The  plant occupies approximately 28 hectacres  (70 acres) of ground, with
most of  the  land  occupied  by   production and warehousing buildings.
Because of the industrial development around the  plant,  there  are  no
foreseeable plans for expansion at  the current facility.

Well water is the only source of raw water supply to this plant, and is
used for all plant water  needs.

The  principal  process waste waters  from this plant are water  and   steam
leakages,   and  washdown  and  runoff  from the machine shop area.   Water
leakages occur in the press  are due to  broken  or   leaking  seals  and
failing bladder bags.  These process waste waters scavenge oil  and  solid
materials   as  they  flow to  the   drains.   Oil  and   solid   materials
accumulate  on  the floor and  in various machinery basins  due to  drippings
and  leaks  from the Banbury dust rings, mill and  pump oil  seals,  open
gears, and  the hydraulic  water system.  In the machine shope area,  steam
used  for   cleaning  of   parts  and runoff  from  painting and washdown
operations  is  allowed to  enter the  storm drain; these waste  waters may
be contaminated with both oil and  solid .material.

Runoff  from the oil-storage is not a  problem  in this plant, because the
drain  in this  area has been  surrounded by  a curb which   prevents  normal
spills  from  entering  the  sewer  system.   In  addition,  there is  a  straw
filter covering  the  drain inlet.   Oil  that spills in this area  is pumped
into a special storage tank  which  is periodically  emptied;  this   waste
oil  is sent to a landfill site.         ,

Both  process   and nonprocess waste waters flow to a common  sewer,  where
they are discharged  to the municipal storm sewer.    Before  leaving  the
                                  93

-------
 plant,  all  waste  waters  must  flow through a shredded plastic filter
 which retains floatable oil.  This filter is replaced periodically.  The
 oil trapped behind the filter is also removed periodically.

 Plant H

 This facility, built in 1945, is located in highly congested and  highly
 industrialized  area.   Essentially  all  of  the  plant-owned  land  is
 utilized for production and warehousing facilities, utility systems, and
 waste water treatment facilities.  Expansion of the current plant  would
 necessitate the leasing of land from adjacent ladowners.

 The facility produces truck tires,  industrial and farm tires, giant off-
 the-road  tires, and various other minor products including bladders and
 rubber gaskets for the curing presses.

 Current production levels for the major products are 6,850  truck  tires
 and 2,430  industrial, farm and giant off-the-road tires per day.

 Sources of raw water include surface water from a nearby  river and muni-
 cipally supplied water,   surface water is used as the primary source of
 once-through cooling water and for  makeup to the cooling  tower and other
 recirculating water systems,   city  water is  used  as  for  boiler  feed
 water  and also as a backup for the' surface water in recirculatina water
 systems.                                                          ^

 The principal process waste waters  are  from  water  and  steam  leakages
 from presses and mills.   These leakages occur at the oil  seals of mills
 at   the hydraulic water system,  and at  the curing presses.   The leakages
 scavenge oil and solids spilled in  press and mill  basins  due to  open
 bearings and lubrication  of machinery parts.   ,

 The  principal  nonprocess   waste waters are the overflows  and blowdowns
 from various  recirculating water   systems,   the  once-through  cooling
 water,   boiler  blowdown,   and  water treatment  wastes.   Contaminants  in
 these waste  waters  include  suspended  and dissolved solids;   these waste
 waters  also  require pH adjustment.

 Whenever   possible,   oil  that  leaks or spills  onto the  floors or basin
 areas is collected.   This oil  either  is  drummed  and  sent  to   a  sanitary
 landfill   or  is  filtered   and   reused.    Plant  engineers are  currently
 examining  the  feasibility of using this  oil  as a  fuel admixture   in  the
 boilers.   With  the   oil   on  the  floor  kept at a  minimum,  less can  be
 scavenged  by water  or steam contact.  There  is however, no treatment   at
 this  plant  for  the  oily wastewaters   that  do   occur; they would  be
 discharged with either once-through cooling water or the  utility  waste
waters,                                                         *

There  is  no  end-of-pipe  treatment for the once-through  (non-contact)
 cooling^water; except  for oil  picked  up due to leakages and spills  this
water  is  uncontaminated,  and discharges back to the river.  Discharges
 from the other utility systems, such  as boiler blowdown,  cooling  tower
blowdown,  and water treatment wastes are directed to an effluent basin
                                   94

-------
where settleable  solids  are  removed.   The  surface  loading  is  600
L/day/sq  m  (15 gal/day/sq ft) and the theoretical detention time is 2a
hours.  There is no provision for continuous removal of solids  or  oil.
Discharges  from  the  effluent  basin are directed via a sanitary sewer
system to a municipally operated treatment plant.

Plant_l                                       •

This plant, built in the late 19th century, is now involved in the manu-
facture of inner tubes, valves, flaps, and similar items associated with
automobile tire applications.  Raw material consumption is approximately
75,000 kilograms (165,000 Ibs) per day.  This amounts to  an  equivalent
of over 50,000 inner tubes per day.

The  production facilities occupy a multi-story building in the downtown
area of a major city.  There has been no expansion at this plant for the
last fifty years.  Because of the extremely  tight  land  situation  and
because  of  the  relatively  stable  tire-tube  market, no expansion is
planned in the foreseeable future.

All the raw water used in this facility is provided by the city.

Principal process waste waters are water and  steam  leakages,  and  the
washdown  of  dusty  areas  within  the  plant.   These  streams  become
contaminated with  oil  and  dust  that  is  scavenged  from  floor  and
machinery  areas.   These • waste waters streams flow into a sewer and are
combined with nonprocess waste waters before discharge from  the  plant.'
Nonprocess  waste  waters  include  once-through  cooling water, cooling
tower and boiler  blowdowns,  and  water  treatment  wastes.   Suspended
solids  will  be  present in substantial quantities in the blowdowns and
water treatment wastes.                                      ,           •

The city sewers are combined sewers;  consequently,  domestic,  process,
and nonprocess waste waters are mixed and treated in the municipal waste
water treatment facility.

The  housekeeping  practices in the plant are unique.  Spillages of soap
and soapstone solutions do occur, but the quantities are so slight  that
they tend to evaporate on the spot; soapstone solution is neither dumped
nor  recirculated.  In processing areas, water is not used for washdown.
Dust is such a problem  (due to thy use of soapstone in  dry  form)  that
any attempt to use water for washdown merely complicates the problem.

There were no waste water treatment facilities operating at the plant at
the  time  of  the visit.  The upgrading of air quality within the plant
has completely occupied the attention of  the  engineering  staff,  thus
relegating concern for water effluent quality to a secondary position.

Synthetic Rubber Plants

Plant J
                                   95

-------
 Emulsion   styrene- butadiene  (SBR)   and  acrylonitrile-butadinee  (NBR)
 synthetic rubbers are produced at this  plant.    The  annual  production
 capacity  is  390,000 kkg (430,000 tons)  of SBR and approximately 10,000
 kkg (11,000 tons)  of NBR.  The plant is located in  an  industrial  area
 with land available for expansion.

 Both SBR and NBR are produced by emulsion polymerization processes.   The
 monomers  are  shipped  into  the complex from  adjacent plants.   The SBR
 crumb is  produced  in  non-extended,   oil-extended,  and  carbon-black-
 extended  forms,   while  the  NBR is produced in non-extended form only.
 The crumb rubber is used principally as tire rubber.  There are   sixteen
 coagulation and finishing lines  in the plant.

 The  plant's  intake  water comes from two sources.   River water is  used
 for cooling tower  makeup,   crumb  rubber  washing- slurrying,  and  area
 washdown.    Plant  well  water  is  softened and then used for  solution
 preparation.   The plant does not have  its own steam generating plant and
 purchases  steam from an adjacent facility.

 The main process  waste waters are generated at  monomer  recovery,  crumb
 coagulation,   and  rubber  washing  operations.    Decant  water  from the
 monomer  decant system  is  recycled  in  part  to  the  crumb slurrying
 operation.    The   remainder,   containing  styrene  and acrylonitrile,  is
 discharged to the process sewer  system and has  a significant  COD.    The
 coagulation liquor overflow is a brine-sulfuric acid mixture,  with a low
 pH,   high  .total   dissolved  solids, and moderate COD.   The crumb slurry
 overflow contains COD,  crumb rubber  particles as suspended  solids,   and
 oil  (when  oil-extended  forms   are  produced)  .   The crumb-laden slurry
 overflow and the  overflow  of coagulation  liquor  pass  through crumb
 settling pits where the crumb separates and is  removed periodically  by a
 scoop.   The   cleaning of the crumb  pits results in  a temporary  upset  as
 the settled crumb is disturbed and re-suspended.   This results  in  poor
 effluent quality  from the pits for a short period.

 The  cleanup   wastes from the latex  vacuum and  steam stripping units  are
 another    process    waste   water   source.     This    waste   water    is
 characteristically  high  in  COD and  suspended  solids,   and  contains
 uncoagulated  latex.    The  units   are   cleaned   periodically  and  large
 volumes  of  water  are used in this operation.  The resulting waste  waters
 are passed  through settling  sumps, where  rubber  solids  settle  out.

 Clean-out waste waters  from reactors and  holding  tanks  are also  produced
 on   an   intermittent  basis.   These   waste  waters,   containing COD and
 suspended  solids,  both  as rubber  solids and  as  uncoagulated  latex,  are
 also passed   through  settling  pits.   Spent caustic soda  scrub  solution
 used to  remove inhibitor from butadiene prior to  its  polymerization,   is
 bled into  the  plant   effluent;  this   waste   stream has high  COD, pH,
 alkalinity  and  color,   and   contains   some  phenols.    its  Ifow  rate,
 however, is very low.
   ^ carbon  black  storage facilities, consisting of railroad unloading
equipment, a storage hopper, and slurrying equipment, generates a waste-
water which is laden with fine carbon black particles.  This waste water
                                 96

-------
 is -the result of the washdown  and  cleanup  of   carbon   black   spills   and
 air-borne   fallout.   These waste  waters pass  through  two  settling pits,
 which operate in parallel.  When one  pit is full  of carbon black  waste-
 water,  the waste  water  is   allowed  to settle and the second pit is
 filled.  The settling pits achieve satisfactory  clarification  of   the
 waste water.
The  utility  waste  waters  consist  of  cooling  tower  blowdown  and water
softener regeneration wastes.   (There is no boiler blowdown,  since  the
plant's  steam  is purchased.)   One  cooling tower has a very low blowdown
rate,  since a high proportion  of the  tower's makeup is steam  condensate.
The  other cooling tower has  a  normal  blowdown rate and  generates  waste
water  containing chromium, zinc, and  othe/heavy  metal  ions.

The  plant's  effluent treatment system  consists of chemical  coagulation
and  primary settling, followed by an   aeration   lagoon  and   a   settling
lagoon.   The   primary  settling facility and the sludge handling system
are  shown in Figure  7.  In the chemical  coagulation process,  the pH  of
the  influent   waste water  is first  adjusted using sulfuric acid and
caustic soda.   Cogulation   chemicals  (alum  and  polyelectrolyte)  are
added,  together  with  clay.   The  latex  and  fine  suspended solids
coagulate around the clay, which causes  the  coagulated  solids in  the
primary  clarifier   to  sink.   The  solids from the primary clarifier are
thickened and pressure filtered, using a lime  slurry  and  filter  aid.
The  filter  cake  is hauled away by  truck to a  landfill.  The  thickener
supernatant is  returned to the head end  of the plant,  and  the   filtrate
is   discharged  to   the  aeration lagoon.:  The plant effluent quality is
good:
                     COD
                     BOD
                     TSS
325 mg/L
 25 mg/L
 30 mg/L
The  high  residual COD concentration  is typical  of  the   high  biological
resistance  of  the  waste  water  components.   The  plant currently  is
conducting  pilot  studies  to   investigate  the   feasibility  of   using
activated  carbon  to  reduce  the   residual  COD.   The results to date
indicate  that a final effluent COD of  13Q mg/L  could be  reached, but the
company concluded that the costs to  implement this  system  would   be
prohibitive.

Plant K

The  plant  complex  consists of emulsion and solution stryene-butadiene
rubber  (SEE) production facilities.  The annual production  capacity   of
emulsion  SBR  is  2,000,000 kkg (2,200,000 tons)  and of solution SBR  is
130,000 kkg (144,000 tons).  The complex is  located  in an  industrial
area with virtually no land available  for further  expansion.

The  emulsion crumb rubber is produced  in non-extended, oil-extended, and
.carbon-black-extended  forms.    The  emulsion rubber processing plant  is
^arranged  into essentially two parallel operations; each  operation  con-
      of  a  solution preparation  building, a polymerization area, a  coag-
                                  97

-------
    z
    Q
    i
    s
    at
    I
   S2
   1/5
   O

   Q

   X
•- Si
a i
   to
   o.
   i
   ec
   U
   O

   I

   O

   8
                                                                9B

-------
ulation  and  finishing  building,  and a! monomer recovery complex.   The
solution crumb rubber is produced also in non-extended, oil-extended and
carbon-black forms.  The solution rubber processing facilities are simi-
larly divided into two parallel units; each unit consists of a  polymer-
ization  area,  a  crumb slurrying and finishing building, and a solvent
and monomer recovery complex.  The solvent used is hexane.

The plant water supply is from on-site wells.  The boiler feed water  is
subjected  to hot lime softening and normal boiler feed treatment chemi-
cals.  The cooling tower makeup is treated  with  corrosion  inhibitors,
anti-sealing agents, and slimicides.  The process water used in emulsion
rubber production is zeolite softened.  Untreated well water is used for
slurrying, rinsing, and washdown.

The  principal  emulsion process waste waters are the coagulation liquor
overflow, the crumb rinse overflow, and the  monomer  recovery  streams.
The  coagulation  liquor is a sulfuric acid-brine mixture with a low pH,
high total dissolved solids, and moderate COD.  The crumb rinse overflow
contains floatable crumb rubber as suspended solids.  In  addition,   the
slurry overflows have high total dissolved solids and moderate COD.

The  coagulation  liquor and crumb slurry overflow pass through settling
pits, where the rubber solids separate.   Under  normal  operation,   the
separator  pits  work  well, but they are not cleaned frequently enough,
and short-circuiting occurs.  Furthermore, during the cleanout operation
the pit is distrubed, and the once-separated  rubber  escapes  into  the
effluent.   Some pits contain an oil layer because baler hydraulic fluid
or extender oil leaks onto  the  floor  and  is  washed  down  into  the
settling pit.

The  waste  waters  from  the monomer recovery area are characterized by
high COD and suspended solids.  These waste waters originate at  monomer
decant  systems  and cleanup operations, and contain uncoagulated latex.
The wastewaters from the  periodic  cleaning  of  the  monomer  recovery
stripping  columns  contain  high concentrations of COD and of latex and
rubber solids.  These waters pass through settling sumps to separate the
rubber solids and the floating oils.  These pits are  also  cleaned  out
periodically.

The  caustic  scrub solution is discharged to the final effluent when it
becomes saturated with inhibitor.  This waste water is of very low  flow
(less than 1 gpm), but has high COD, pH, alkalinity and color.  When the
latex  storage  and  the  blend tanks are cleaned, the latex-laden rinse
water can be used for latex blending if its solids  content  is  greater
than  2 percent.  Tankage rinse waters with rubber solids levels of less
than 2  percent  are  discharged  to  the  plant  effluent.   The  major
contaminant in this water is uncoagulated latex.

The  carbon  black  slurrying area is equipped with a settling pit which
receives spillages and washdown waste waters.  The carbon black  settles
out,  and  the  waste  water  overflows at a very low flow rate into the
final effluent.  The settling pit is cleaned  out  periodically  with  a
vacuum truck.
                                 99

-------
 The   solution  rubber  process  waste waters  are  very similar to those  of
 other solution rubber  production  facilities.    The  principal  streams
 originate   at  the  crumb  slurrying  operation   and the solvent-monomer
 recovery areas.   The crumb slurry overflow has moderate   COD,   suspended
 solids,  and  total dissolved  solids.   It  passes  through  a settling  sump,
 where suspended solids  are removed.   The  waste waters from  the  solvent
 and  monomer recovery areas are  stripped condensates  and  decants,  and are
 characterized by moderate amounts of COD  and floating oils.

 The  utility waste waters  are  boiler  and cooling  tower blowdown  and  water
 treatment   wastes.    The  boiler blowdown  has high total  dissolved solids
 and  a high  pH.   The cooling tower blowdown contains  high total  dissolved
 solids  and  moderate  levels  of chromium   and zinc   from    chemical
 inhibitors.    The  spent   lime  slurry from  the  hot  lime water  treatment
 system exhibits  a high  pH and suspended solids level.  The  lime  slurry
 settles  out   in  the  plant  drain   and  must be mechanically removed  at
 periodic intervals.   The  waste  from  the zeolite  softener regeneration  is
 a concentrated brine solution with high total dissolved  solids.

 The  waste water  treatment system  consists of air flotation clarification
 and  biological treatment  (refer to Figure 8) .    The   waste  water  first
 passes  through   a  mechanical  bar   screen   which   removes  large rubber
 solids,  and is neutralized to  pH 7.0 and   dosed   with  coagulant  and
 flocculant  aids   in a  rapid-mix tank.    The   waste water then passes
 through  a flocculator tank and  into the primary  clarifier, whre a slip-
 stream  laden with   air   is  released near  the  bottom of the unit.  The
 rinsing  air bubles  carry  the  suspended solids and oil-type  contaminants
 to   the  surface,  where   they  are skimmed  off.  The  clarified effluent
 flows  into  an aerated lagoon, equipped with  six  aerators,  where  it   is
 retained for  24 hours.

 Effluent  from ' the  aerated lagoon is  pumped to  the  secondary air flota-
 tion clarifier, where biological  solids are  removed.   Operations  include
 rapid  mix of  coagulation   chemicals,   flocculation,  and   clarification.
 The  primary and secondary  sludges  are  pumped to  an on- site sludge lagoon
 for  dewatering   and drying.   Studies are being  conducted to dispose of
 this sludge by off -site landfill  or  via  incineration.   The  treatment
 plant  produces a high-quality  effluent.  Pollution  parameters which are
 still  present  at  substantail  levels after treatment  are total  dissolved
 solids  and   COD.    The  residual  COD underlines the inherent biological
 resistivity of some  of the waste water constitutents.
This plant has SBR, polybutadiene, resin,  and  oil-additive  production
facilities.   In  addition, there is a rubber compounding facility which
produces sheet rubber as a  customer  service.   The  annual  production
rates are:
    Cold-emulsion SBR
    Hot-emulsion SBR
    Solution-type polybutadiene
    Solution SBR
120,000 metric tons (133,000 tons)
  3,700 metric tons (4,100 tons)
 52,000 metric tons (58,000 tons)
 10,000 metric tons (11,000 tons)
                                100

-------
          310A03H
                 ^S


Nounnoaioaa      «
           101

-------
 The  plant is located in a rural area with land available for expansion.
 Emulsion rubber production started in 1943, solution type  polybutadiene
 in I960, and solution type SBR in 1963.

 The  cold-emulsion  type  SBR is produced in non-extended, oil-extended,
 and carbon-black-extended forms,  it is used  primarily  in  tire  manu-
 facture.   This  type of emulsion SBR is similar to that produced at the
 other^plants described in this section.  The  process  for  hot-emulsion
 SBR  is  a  higher-temperature  polymerization and is non-extended;  this
 product is used primarily for electrical wire  covering.   The  solution
 type  polybutadiene is produced as non-extended and oil-extended rubbers
 and is used primarily in  tire  manufacture;   toluene  is  the  solvent.
 Solution  SBR  is  non-extended and has several end uses.   The butadiene
 used in the plant is received by pipeline from a neighboring plant,   and
 the styrene is  shipped in by tank truck.

 The  plant's water  supply  consists of  well water.   The plant does not
 have steam generating facilities but purchases steam  from  an  adjacent
 plant.   The well water is treated with corrosion inhibitors,  slimicides,
 and  dispersants  for  cooling  tower  makeup and is softened to provide
 process water for preparation of the emulsion rubber solution.

 The process waste  waters  from  emulsion  rubber  production  originate
 principally  in  two  areas:   crumb slurrying and monomer  recovery oper-
 ations.   These  waste waters are typical of emulsion  rubber   production
 facilities.   The  slurry  overflow  is  passed  through  a crumb pit to
 separate the crumb rubber fines.    The monomer  strippers are  cleaned
 periodically.    The vacuum stripping vessels  and steam stripping columns
 are flooded with wash water,  and the residual latex  and  rubber solids
 are  discharged with the  wash water.   The units are finally rinsed,  pro-
 ducing more waste water with  additional suspended solids.

 Both  of  the  solution type rubbers  are  produced  by  similar   processes.
 The  main  process  waste  waters   are the  crumb slurry overflow and the
 solvent-monomer recovery  wastes.   The slurry  overflow is passed  through
 a pit, where the crumb rubber is  separated  and  periodically removed.  As
 is  the  case with all  the plants visited, the crumb pits are not  cleaned
 regularly,  and  during  cleanining the  crumb  is disturbed and escapes  the
 pit.   The   waste waters   from the   solvent-monomer   recovery area  are
 condensates  from monomer  decant  systems  and   solvent   distillation
 condensates.    They  are   characteristically high  in COD,  BOD,  and total
 dissolved solids.

 The plant's  utility waste waters are  cooling tower blowdown and   zeolite
 softener  regeneration  wastes.  The blowdown has high  chromium and zinc
 concentrations,  from the corrosion inhibitor.  The  softener regeneration
waste is a strong brine solution and therefore has  a   high  total  dis-
 solved solids concentration.

The  plant's waste water treatment facilities consist of settling ponds,
followed by aerated and stabilization  lagoons.  The  plant's  final  ef-
fluent  is treated with alum and polyelectrolyte to obtain proper coagu-
lation of latex solids and fine rubber crumb particles.
                                102

-------
The waste water flows through two parallel sets of  two  settling  ponds
each,  where  the  settleable solids and oils separate.  The waste water
then flows through two further settling  ponds  in  series.   The  total
detention  time in the six settling ponds is four days.  Troublesome oil
is  skimmed  from  the  ponds.   The  waste  water  then  passes  to   a
mechanically  aerated lagoon, which provides approximately three days of
detention.  The aerated lagoon effluent  passes  through  two  oxidation
ponds,  which  stabilize  the  waste  waters  and  settle the biological
solids.   The  total  detention  time  in   the   oxidation   ponds   is
approximately thirteen days.

Although  overall  treatment  provided  by  the  facilities is good, the
effluent  quality  (BOD  particularly)   does   not   meet   the   State
requirements.    It   has   been   established   by  analyses  that  the
stabilization ponds are not producing the soluble BOD removals that were
expected, but the cause of the problem has not been  determined.   There
are  indications that the effectiveness of the ponds is dependent on the
water temperature  (and, therefore,  the  time  of  the  year)  but  this
hypothesis has yet to be confirmed.

Plant M

The   total   plant   complex  consists  of  a  butadiene  plant  and  a
polybutadiene  production  facility.   The   butadiene   plant   started
production  in  1957  and  the  polybutadiene  facility  in  1961.   The
polybutadiene production  facility,  which  uses  butadiene  as  a  feed
monomer,  has  a capacity of 85,000 metric tons'per year and is adjacent
to the butadiene facility.  The complex is located in a rural area  with
good potential for expansion and land acquisition.

The  polybutadiene is produced by a solution-type polymerization process
using,butadiene as the feed monomer and  hexane  as  the  solvent.   The
crumb  polybutadiene  rubber  is  used principally as a tire rubber.  In
addition,  a  high-grade  variety  is  used  as  an  ingredient  in  the
manufacture  of  impact-resistant  plastic.   The  rubber is not oil- or
carbon-black-extended.

The polybutadiene plant has two sources for water supply, well water and
river water.  The well water is used primarily for  boiler  and  cooling
tower  makeup,  while  the river water  (after clarification, filtration,
and softening) is used in the crumb slurrying operation and for  general
plant cleanup.

The  principal  process  waste  waters originate in the solvent-monomers
reclaim area and in the crumb slurrying  operation.   The  waste  waters
produced  in the reclaim area originate from several operations: solvent
recovery, monomer recovery, and feed drying.   The  major  component  of
these  waste  waters is produced by a decant system fed from the solvent
and monomer stripping operation.  This waste water is relatively  clean,
its  only  contamination  being  due to hexane at saturation solubility.
The other waste water streams from the reclaim area have very  low  flow
and are essentially innocuous with the exception of dissolved hexane.
                                103

-------
Impure   recovered  butadiene  monomer  is  returned  to  the  butadiene
production plant for purification.  Heavy slops  (oily  wastes)  produced
in  the  hexane  recovery  operation are sent to the butadiene plant for
disposal or are used as a waste fuel.  The  other  major  process  waste
water,  the  crumb slurrying overflow, is laden with rubber crumb in the
form of  suspended  solids.   The  suspended  solids  are  significantly
reduced by in-plant screening and clarification in a pit.

At  least  one finishing line recovers the solid rubber product directly
from the rubber cement.  No water rinse system is used.  The  "finishing
machine"  takes  cement  and  produces  material  ready  for  baling and
packaging.  This machine was not seen, and presumably is  some  type  of
extruder  for  removing  solvent.   It  obviously  has  a  potential for
reducing the effluent flow and loading attributable to the  crumb  rinse
overflow.

There are two other process-associated waste waters.  Spent caustic soda
solution,  from  scrubbing  of butadiene inhibitor  (to prevent premature
polymerization during storage and shipping), is batch discharged.   This
stream  has  extremely high COD, pH, alkalinity, and color, and contains
phenols.  The batch discharge is containerized in a pit  and  bled  into
the  plant effluent at a very low flow rate,  with such handling or pre-
treatment, it poses no waste water problem.

The other waste water which should be mentioned  results  from  frequent
area  washdowns.   This  picks  up primarily crumb rubber and oils.  The
oils originate from leaks in baler hydraulic systems and leaks  of  pump
seal  oil.   In  solution-type  polymerization, water must be eliminated
from much of the process equipment.  Oil is used to seal  and  lubricate
the  process  pumps.   The  washdown  waste  waters contribute the major
proportions of suspended solids, soluble organics, and oils in the final
effluent.

The principal nonprocess waste  waters  are  boiler  and  cooling  tower
blowdowns  and  water treatment wastes.  The waste water characteristics
of these streams are high total  dissolved  solids,  and  moderate  COD,
suspended  solids,  and  pH.  The cooling tower makeup is treated with a
corrosion inhibitor containing chromium and zinc.  These  metals  appear
in the cooling tower blowdowns.

The  total  effluent  from the butadiene and polybutadiene plants passes
through an oil separator and straw filter before discharge.   Since  the
quantity  and  loading  of the waste waters from the butadiene plant are
far greater than those  from  the  polybutadiene  plant,  no  meaningful
treatment  data could be obtained.  The raw waste water flow and loading
of the polybutadiene plant were the  lowest  of  any  of  the  synthetic
rubber plants visited.

It is planned to expand the synthetic rubber plant production facilities
shortly.    This   expansion  will  approximately  double  the  existing
synthetic rubber production capacity.

Plant N
                                104

-------
The plant, complex consists of iosprene, polyolefin resin,  polyisoprene,
and  polybutadiene  production facilities^  The complex was completed in
1962.  Polyisoprene production capacity is 65,000  metric  tons  (72,000
tons)  per  year  and  the annual production of polybutadiene is 110,000
metric tons (122,000 tons).  The complex is located in a rural area with
expansion capability and undeveloped land of its own.

The polyisoprene is produced by solution polymerization with  hexane  as
the  solvent, using isoprene from the neighboring isoprene plant as feed
monomer.  Several types of polyisoprene are produced in  this  facility.
Each  type  requires  a  separate  production  run  on common processing
equipment.  The crumb rubber is used mainly for tire manufacture and  is
not oil or carbon black extended.

There  are  two  polybutadiene  lines  which  employ  slightly different
processing techniques.  There is no significant difference in the  over-
all  waste  water  flows  and  loadings  from  these two processes.  The
polybutadiene  is  consumed  principally  in   tire   manufacture,   and
approximately 50 percent of the polybutadiene is oil extended.

The  plant's  water  supply  is  river water.  Process and boiler makeup
water receives extensive treatment, consisting  of.  coagulation,  clari-
fication, filtration, chlorination, and softening.

The  main  process  waste  waters  are  produced  in the monomer-solvent
reclaim area and  the  crumb  slurrying  operation.   The  waste  waters
generated  in  the  reclaim  area  have  low  flow  rates  and, with the
exception of saturation with solvent or monomers, are relatively clean.

Part of the recovered isoprene is sent in a slip stream to the  isoprene
production  plant  for purification.  This procedure serves to blow down
the accumulated impurities.  Impure butadiene recovered from  the  poly-
butadiene  plant  is  hauled  from  the  plant  as  a  waste.  The crumb
slurrying overflows are passed through settling pits where the crumb  is
trapped  and  periodically removed.  Surfactants are added to the crumb-
water mix during the coagulation operation to  prevent  the  crumb  from
agglomerating  into masses which are too large.  These surfactants enter
the crumb slurry overflow.

One type of polyisoprene produces a crumb slurry effluent  which  has  a
considerably   higher   dissolved   organic   loading   than  the  other
polyisoprenes or the polybutadiene types.  This difference  is  inherent
in  the  chemistry  of  the  process  and is not a general or widespread
problem in the synthetic rubber industry.

Area wash-down and cleanup is a major contributor of contaminants to the
final effluent.  Crumb screens used  inside  the  processing  areas  are
hosed  down  to remove coagulated rubber.  The resulting waste water has
high suspended solids levels and is passed through  the  crumb  settling
pits.   Spent  caustic  solution  from  the  inhibitor removal system is
containerized and bled into the final  effluent.   It  has  the  typical
high, COD, pH, alkalinity, and color.
                                105

-------
 Typical  utility  waste  waters,  principally  boiler  and cooling tower
 Slowdowns and water treatment  wastes,  are  generated  at  this  plant.
 Characteristics  of  these  wastes are high total dissolved solids, with
 moderate COD, suspended solids, and pH.  The  cooling  tower  makeup  is
 treated with a low chromium corrosion inhibitor.   This produces chromium
 levels  in  the cooling tower blowdown that are less than one quarter of
 those associated with conventional cooling tower corrosion treatments.

 The waste water treatment  system  consists  of  an  equalization  basin
 (four-day  detention),  a  neutralization  sump,  with nutrient addition,
 followed by an activated sludge plant (refer to Figure  9).    The  waste
 activated  sludge  is first thickened and then pumped to a sludge drying
 basin on the plant property.   The treatment plant gives  very  good  BOD
 effluent   levels   (10  mg/L),,  however,  the  effluent  COD  level  is
 considerable (250 mg/L).  This is due to  the  biological  stability  of
 many  of  the  waste water components such as the monomers and solvents,
 which, although generally considered insoluble,  do have some  solubility
 in water.

 An  apparent  characteristic   of  the  plant's waste water  which can be
 attributed to the synthetic rubber production is  foaming in  the aeration
 basins and in the final outfall.   This is apparently caused  by excessive
 use of surfactants by  the  production  personnel  in  the  crumb  rinse
 operation.   Another problem is  poor settling of the biological sludge in
 the  secondary  clarifier.    Efforts  were  made  to assist settling,  and
 achieve additional COD removal, by adding activated carbon  granules  to
 the  aeration  basins  upon which biological solids could nucleate.   This
 did not produce satisfactory  results.   The current  technique  which  is
 proving more  successful   is  the  addition  of  coagulation aids to the
 clarifier  influent.  This,  however,  is proving to  be  expensive on an
 annual-cost  basis.    A less  frequent problem,  but more serious,  is an
 apparent  high  BOD slug   loading,  with  associated   toxicity,    that
 unpredictably   occurs  in  the   plant  influent.    This   problem is
 uncontrolled at present, but  appears to originate with the production of
 either the polyolefin  resin or  one type of polyisoprene.
The plant complex consists of polybutadiene, polyisoprene and  ehtylene-
propylene  diene  terpolymer   (EPDM)  rubber production facilities.  The
commissioning of all the production facilities occurred between 1967 and
1970.  The  annual  production  capacities  are:   polybutadiene  56,000
metric  tons  (62,000  tons),  polyisoprene  50,000  metric tons  (55,000
tons), and EPDM 25,000 metric tons  (28,000 tons).  The plant is   located
in  a  rural areas and has considerable land for expansion.  Each of the
three synthetic rubber products has its own production facility  and  is
produced  in a solution polymerization process.  Polybutadiene rubber is
carbon black extended.  The principal end-use of the crumb rubbers is in
tire manufacture.

The plant's water supply is well water.   Well  water  is  treated  with
corrosion inhibitors and slimicides for use as cooling tower makeup, and
softened for use as boiler quality water.
                                106

-------
           CO     —I
z
UJ
LU

Qi
LU
I—
to
LU
o
o
ID
 P
 U
 <

 Q.
                                           107

-------
 Principal process waste waters originate in the crumb slurrying overflow
 and presumably in the solvent, monomer, and reclaim areas,  carbon black
 added  at  the coagulation-slurrying stage is essentially trapped in the
 crumb rubber matrix.  Carbon black  spills  and  leaks  pass  through  a
 settling  sump and are allowed to overflow into the final effluent.  The
 settled carbon black is removed by vacuum truck.

 Extender oil that is not entrained in the rubber crumb  can  contaminate
 the  slurry  overflow  waste water.  It is understood that screens, with
 higher_crumb removals than conventional equipment, have  been  installed
 in  this plant.  The butadiene monomer is inhibited and presumably there
 is an associated spent caustic scrub solution discharge.  Area  washdown
 and  cleanup  is  on  a  shift-by-Shift  basis.    Whenever possible, the
 material is cleaned up in such a manner to  eliminate  wastes  from  the
 waste water system.

 The  plant's  utility  waste  waters are characterized by high levels of
 total dissolved solids and moderate pH.  The cooling tower blowdown  has
 high  chromium  and  zinc  content  originating  from  the cooling tower
 corrosion inhibitors used.

 The^plant's waste waters are first passed through skimming and  settling
 basins  where  the  rubber  crumb is trapped.   The waste crumb rubber is
 removed  every two to three months by  dip  bucket.    The  effluent  from
 these pits  flows  into two 1.2 hectacre (3-acre)  lagoons.   The process
 effluent from the lagoons combines with  treated  sanitary,   storm,   and
 utility   waste  waters  before  entering  first  a 6.0 hectacre (15-acre)
 lagoon and finally a 12.0 hectacre (30-acre)  lagoon before discharge  to
 the receiving waters.   The final waste water quality is good.   COD,  BOD,
 and  suspended solids  are at an approximate level of 50,  5,  and 10 mg/L,
 respectively.   This  plant,  however,  is particularly fortunate in  having
 considerable  land  for  use as waste water lagoons.   It is  not possible
 for all  synthetic plants to have the same or even comparable facilities.

 Plant P

 This  plant produces  styrene-butadiene (SBR)  and   acrylonitrile-butadiene
 (NBR)^ latexes.    In  addition,   the  plant  produces  polyvinyl  acetate
 emulsions  and hot melt adhesives.  The annual production   rates   of   the
 latexes  are:   styrene-butadiene latex 18,000 metric  tons  (20,000  tons),
 acrylonitrilebutadiene latex 3,000 metric  tons  (3,300  tons).   The  plant
 is  located in a rural  area  with  land available for  expansion.

 The  ^butadiene latexes   manufactured   at   the   plant  are  made  similarly
 utilizing  equipment trains   of   a  similar  nature.    The  monomers   are
 shipped  into   the   plant  by both tank car and  tank truck.  The  latexes
 produced are  used for  carpet backing,  dipped goods, and adhesives.

 The plant's water comes  from on-site wells.  The water is  treated  in  a
 dual-bed demineralizer to supply boiler quality makeup water and process
water  for  solution preparation.  The cooling tower water is treated with
a corrosion inhibitor and algicide.
                                108

-------
The  principal  process waste waters produced in the plant are generated
by equipment cleanout, area washdown, and , stripper  condensates.   Tank
cars and tank trucks are rinsed with water and the contaminated water is
discharged  to  the  waste water treatment facility.  These waste waters
will contain monomers and uncoagulated latex.   Reactors  and  strippers
are  cleaned  of  solid  deposits with a high pressure watergun and then
water rinsed.  slowdown tanks,  filters,  compound  tanks,  and  storage
tanks  are  rinsed with water.  In all cases the waste waters discharged
to the waste water treatment  facility  contain  organic  compounds  and
latex.   Latex  spills  and  leakages  are  first  coagulated with alum,
cleaned up in-place, and finally washed down.  The washings are sent  to
the treatment facility.

Excess  monomers  are  stripped  from the latex with steam under vacuum.
The vacuum is produced using steam  jets  and  not  vacuum  pumps.   The
exc3ss  styrene,  or  acrylonitrile,  is  condensed  and discharged to a
receiver.  Although the receiver is periodically decanted and  the  con-
densed  styrene  or  acrylonitrile  drummed  for  disposal,  styrene and
acrylonitrile still enter the effluent waste waters.   A  caustic  scrub
solution  is  used  to  remove  the  butadiene  inhibitor, which is bled
gradually to the final effluent.  Characteristics  of  this  stream  are
high COD, pH, alkalinity, and color.

The plant utility waste waters enter the storm sewer system.  The boiler
blowdown   has  a  low  flow  rate . but  high  total  dissolved  solids.
Demineralizer regeneration wastes are both acidic and alkaline  and  may
potentially  produce  pH  peaks.   The cooling tower blowdown is high in
total dissolved solids but, because the corrosion  inhibitors  used  are
chromium  and  zinc  .free,  these  heavy  metals  do  not  appear in the
blowdown.  The vacuum pump seal water is currently discharged on a once-
through basis to the storm sewer system.   This  water  picks  up  small
quantities   of   organic   compounds   but  has  only  a  moderate  COD
concentration,  studies are being made to recycle the bulk of  the  seal
water and discharge the blowdown only to the treatment facility.

The  plant's  treatment  facility  consists  of chemical coagulation and
clarification followed by activated  sludge  secondary  treatment.   The
final  effluent  after  secondary treatment is discharged to a municipal
treatment  plant.   All  the  latex  plant  process  waste  waters   are
discharged  to  two  coagulation  pits.  They operate so that one pit is
being filled with waste water, while water in the second  pit  is  being
treated,  settled,  and  emptied.   The  pH  of the waste water  is first
adjusted  with  lime   and  then  treated  with   ferrous   sulphate,    a
polyelectrolyte,  and  limestone.  The  latex solids coagulate around the
limestone which serves to sink  the  solids.   The  settled  solids  are
removed  from  the  pits  periodically  when  the   solids depth  becomes
excessive.  The  clarified  waste  water  enters  four  aeration  basins
operated  in  parallel.  The  basins are equipped with four 15-horsepower
aerators.  The aeration basin effluent  enters a secondary clarifier  and
overflows to a sump from which it is pumped to the  city treatment plant.
The   clarifier  underflow  is sent  to   a   sludge  thickener, while the
supernatant  is returned to the aeration basins.  The  biological  sludge
in   the   thickener   is  periodically  removed  and  landfilled.   The
                                 109

-------
 coagulation pit solids and  the  thickened  biological  solids  are  not
 suitable  for satisfactory landfill because of their high water content.
 Studies are currently underway  to  determine  adequate  techniques  for
 dewatering  and  disposing  these sludges.  The coagulation pits provide
 good quality primary effluent.  The COD and BOD  of  this  effluent  are
 high,  however.  The secondary treatment plant produces a final effluent
 having a COD and BOD of approximately 600 and 50 mg/L respectively.   The
 high COD:BOD ratio indicates high biological  resistance  of  the  waste
 water  constituents  from  this latex plant.  Although the BOD level (50
 mg/L) would not be suitable for direct discharge, it is very amenable to
 acceptable discharge to secondary treatment plants.

 Plant Q

 This plant is  responsible  for  the  manufacture  of  stryene-butadiene
 latexes.    The  annual  production  rate  is approximately 21,000 metric
 tons.  The plant commenced production in 1952 and is located in an urban
 area with limited room for expansion.  The plant  also  has  a  research
 facility  and a pilot plant.

 The   stryene-butadiene  family  of  latexes produced at the plant can be
 classified by three groups:   stryene-butadiene latex,   styrene-butadiene
 carboxylated  latex,  and  stryren-butadiene-vinyl  pyridine latex.   All
 these latexes are produced by similar processing techniques  and  equip-
 ment.  The  monomers used (styrene,  butadiene,  organic acids,  and vinyl
 pyridine)  are shipped to the plant by tank  car   and  tank  truck.    The
 latexes produced are used for tire fabric coating, backing material,  and
 paper coatings.

 The   plant  uses  city water for process  water,  boiler makeup water,  and
 cooling tower makeup.   The boiler makeup  is softened  before  injection.
 •e.,5oolln^  tower  makeup   is  treated   with  a dispersant,  corrosion
 inhibitor,   and   slimicide.    The  process  water,   used  for   solution
 preparation,  is  deionized before use.

 The?principal process  waste  waters  generaged in  the  plant  originate from
 equipment  cleanout,   area  washdown,   and stripper  condensates.   Excess
 monomers  are  not recovered.   Reactors,  strippers  and storage tanks   are
 periodically   cleaned   of rubber  build-up by hand  and  then rinsed with
 water.  Generally,  large  quantities of  water are  used  for  each  cleanout.
 The  latex filters are  frequently cleaned.   This  involves first  removing
 the  trapped rubber  solids  and flushing  the filter with water.   The rinse
 waters  contain  suspended  solids, COD,  and uncoagulated  latex.  Floors
 and  loading-unloading  areas  are  flushed with water.   These  wastewaters
 contain   COD,  suspended solids,  and uncoagulated  latex.  The vapors from
 steam stripping  operations are condensed  and discharge into  a  receiver.
 The   receiver  waters  which  overflow  to   the plant sewers have a high
 organic loading with correspondingly high  COD  and oil levels.  The  seal
water  for  the  vacuum  pump  serving  the  vacuum stripping equipment is
 slightly contaminated with organics, and presently discharges on a once-
through basis.  Studies are being made  to collect individual seal  water
discharges  and  recycle  the bulk of them with a controlled blowdown of
                                110

-------
contaminated water.
final effluent.
This will reduce the total volume  in  the  plant's
The  regeneration  waste  from  the  boiler  water  makeup softener is a
concentrated  salt  solution  and  therefore  contributes   high   total
dissolved , solids  to  the  effluent.   The  process  water deionizer is
regenerated with sulphuric acid and  caustic  soda.   The  discharge  of
these solutions will produce both acid and alkali peaks in the effluent,
although  there  is  generally  an excess of sulphuric acid in the daily
regeneration  discharges.   The  boiler  and  cooling  tower   blowdowns
contribute  high  total dissolved solids and moderate COD to the plant's
final effluent.

The treatment of the plant's waste waters include equalization, chemical
coagulation and settling, and secondary treatment in the  local  munici-
pality's  treatment  plant.   The waste waters are first pumped from the
plant  effluent  trench  into  an  equalization  basin,  which  provides
approximately  24 hours detention and is aerated with two aerators.  The
pH of the equalized waste water is adjusted from  normally  alkaline  by
addition  of sulfuric acid to the neutralization sump.  The waste waters
are pumped from the sump to a reactor-clarifier where  alum,  coagulant,
and polyelectrolyte are added in the mixing chamber.  The latex and fine
rubber  particles' are  coagulated  and  collected ,as a sludge from the
bottom of the clarifier.  The clarified effluent overflows the clarifier
to the city's sanitary sewer for  secondary  treatment.   The  clarified
sludge  is sent to a thickener and finally to a sludge holding tank, and
is then loaded into a tank truck for disposal.  The supernatant from the
thickener is returned to the reactor-clarifier.   The  treatment  system
described  above  produces a good quality primary effluent.  COD and BOD
are reduced by approximately  70  and  50  percent,  respectively.   The
suspended solids  and oil are decreased by 80 and 50 percent each.

Summary of control and Treatment Technology

In-plant   control   technology  covers  segregation  and  measures  for
handling, reuse,  modification of processing,  and  disposal  of  various
types  of waste waters,  including spills and leakage, washdowns, control
of  runoffs,   and  housekeeping   practices.    End-of-pipe   treatment
technology  covers  the  treatment of various combinations of process and
nonprocess wastewaters.  separate discussions are  presented for the Tire
and Inner Tube and the Synthetic Rubber  segments of the  industry.

Tires  and Inner Tubes                    ;        ,

In-Plant Control

In-plant measures included the  proper  handling  of   soapstone,  of  the
latex  dip,  and of discharges  from air  pollution  equipment.

Soa£Stone

Soapstone  is  a slurry normally  consisting  of clay,  an emulsifying  agent,
and water.    According   to  one   plant  representative,   soapstone,   if
                                 111

-------
 continually discharged, will contribute a high solids and BOD loading to
 ^.•P^°CeSVWaute  waters-   The  standard  method  of  eliminating  a
 continuous  discharge  of  large quantities of soapstone is the use of a
 closed-loop  recirculation  system.   Such  a  system   needs   periodic
 cleaning,  usually  on a weekly basis.  This cleaning operation can, but
 does not necessarily, lead to  a  discharge.   Prior  to  cleaning,  the
 soapstone  solution  in  the  system is generally transferred to storage
 tanks.  The alternative to recirculation is to  discharge  the  solution
 directly  into  the process sewers.  Both practices were observed during
 the field survey, the first being the better from a waste water  control
 standpoint.   Soapstone  washwater  is  a  potential  discharge which is
 commonly sent to end-of-pipe treatment.   However, it was  observed  that
 this  washwater  could  be  stored  and used as makeup .for the soapstone
 solutions for future operations.   Alternative  methods  for  controlling
 discharges  from weekly washdown include the use of substitute solutions
 which require the system to be cleaned on a less frequent basis.

 Control of minor discharges of soapstone, such as spills and leakage,  is
 achieved by the use of curbing and by blocking off drains in the dipping
 area.   In addition, drip pans are provided for  stock  during  the  air-
 drying  operation.    Soapstone  that  is spilled into the curbed area  is
 periodically vacuumed out and sent to a  landfill site.   Newer plants are
 52?^??^   without  drains  in   this  area,    thus   eliminating  the
 possibility of soapstone contamination of process waste  waters,   instead
 of   curbing,   steel grates are placed on the floor;  these can be removed
 when cleaning the area.

 Latex  Dip

 The  most common practice of the larger  manufacturers  is  to eliminate
 this  operation from the tire  facility.   Fabric  is dipped by  a centrally
 located facility and then shipped to the tire  plant.  However, in  plants
 that still dip fabric, the  accepted  procedure  is  to  seal off  drains   in
 the  immediate  area,  supply  the area  with curbing, and drum the waste
 solutions  for  disposal at landfill sites.  The alternative  is   to dump
 the  waste solutions into  process sewers which  are  destined  for end-of-
 pipe treatment systems.   The amount  of  waste  from  this  operation   is
 small,  less than 230 liters  (60 gals) per day.   Drumming of the  solution
 is therefore preferred,  since treatment of this  stream once diluted with
 other  streams  is  difficult.

Mr  Pollution  Control Residues
             c?mmon. for  manufacturers  to  use large quantities of wet
           -collection systems,  in the compounding area, in particular
bag-houses, rather than wet scrubbers are used.  Wet  systems  are  more
common in the tire-finishing area, where they collect the grindings from
the ^ white sidewall grinding machines, balancing machines, and the tire-
repair area.

Discharges from  wet  scrubbers  contain  high  loadings  of  settleafole
solids,  which  must  be  removed  before  final  discharge.  The solids
collected from the tire-finishing area can be settled  out  in  a  small
                                112

-------
sump.   The  particulates  are  large,  and  with  a  properly  designed
separator, the clarified water can  be,  and  frequently  is  completely
reused.

The  discharges from wet scrubbers used in the compounding area are much
finer and require longer settling times.  Only one  plant  visited  used
wet  scrubbers  in  this area.  This plant used a 2,100 sq. meter (0.52-
acre) lagoon  to  separate  the  solids  from  this  discharge.   Unless
specifically required to meet air pollution ordinances, wet scrubbers in
this area are not recommended.

Additional  air  pollution  equipment  can be found in the tire-painting
areas.  Stricter air emission standards and OSHA standards  are  forcing
tighter  controls  on  particulate and solvent emissions from this area.
Consequently, the industry is currently attempting to substitute  water-
based  paints  and  sprays  for  solvent-based  materials, but with only
limited success.  Wet air pollution equipment in this area was found  at
only  one  plant;  there  was not waste water discharge, because all the
scrubber water was reused.

Spills and Leakage

To control oily waste waters resulting  from  spills  and  leakage,  the
common  practice is to provide curbing and oil sumps and to seal drains.
In older plants, the roller mills are located in basins.   The  blocking
off  of  drains  in  these  basins  as a control measure is not feasible
because electrical machinery is  located in the basins.  A  broken  water
pipe  would fill the basin, thus shorting out the machinery.  Curbing is
used to keep normal area washdown and periodic leakages and spills  from
entering  the  basin  and  thus  contaminating process waters.  In newer
plants, machinery is located on  the floor surface.  Updated seal designs
prevent the leakage of oil.   In  many   cases,  potentially  contaminating
areas  have  no drains, thus eliminating the possibility of oil in these
process waste waters.

In plants where recirculated water is  the primary   source   for  cooling,
the   process  and  nonprocess  sewers   are  separate.  Oil sumps and APT
separators can therefore be provided to treat oily  process waste waters.
The  separable oil  from these  devices  is removed  either  periodically  by
maintenance  peiple  or  continuously  by a belt filter:   the continuous
removal  is considered the  better practice.  During  periodic   removal  of
oil,  the  agitation supplied will result in  a large  quantity of  oil being
released   to the effluent, thus  reducing the separator's  overall average
removal  efficiency.

In plants where the  primary  source  of  cooling   is   once-through  water,
process   and  nonprocess  sewers  are  combined.  Removal of  oil must be
accomplished  in  an end-of-pipe treatment   facility.    Dilution by  non-
process  waste waters directly affects the  removal efficiencies of oil in
the  end-of-pipe  treatment facility.

Washdowns and Machine Cleaning
                                 113

-------
 Common^  practice   for   prevention   of  process-area  washdowns  from
 contaminating waste waters is the use of dry sweeping equipment.   These
 include  automatic  sweepers,  brooms,  and  shovels.   oily  spills are
 cleaned using solvents and rags,  the  resulting  contaminated  material
 being  drummed and sent to a landfill.  Practices employed in nonprocess
 areas (such as the boiler house and storage areas)  are similar.

 Machines and machinery parts  are  normally  cleaned  with  solvents  or
 steam.   Spent  solvents are drummed and sent to a landfill.   The use of
 steam requires a special area supplied with curbing and an API separator
 to remove separable oil and soids.  Discharges  of  untreated  oil-  and
 solid-contaminated  steam  condensate occur and constitute a significant
 source of  process  waste  waters.   Although  steam  cleaning  has  the
 disadvantage  of  having a discharge that must be treated, it eliminates
 the possiblity of a careless operator discharging  large  quantities  of
 organic solvents into an untreated process waste water stream.

 Molds_ from  the  curing  presses  are normally cleaned by sand- or air-
 blasting equipment.   These are dry,  and involve no waste water problem.

 Runoff

 Runoff from oil-storage areas occurs due to oil spills,  storm water,  and
 various_blowdowns which occur in the storage area.    Handling practices
 vary  within  the  industry.   Minimal control involves the diking of all
 oil-storage areas to prevent contamination of wastewater  by   large  oil
 spillages  which  can  occur  during  unloading or  due to leaking tanks.
 These dikes generally are provided with drainage ports to prevent normal
 storm water from filling the diked area.   This  allows  minor oil   spills,
 attributable  to  operator  negligence,   to contaminate  storm runoff.  A
 better system involves the diking of the storage area,   the  roofing of
 storage   area to  prevent storm runoff contamination,  and use of an oil
 sump to  collect  minor spills  and leakage.   Collected oil is drummed  and
 sent  _to _a  landfill.    TO   prevent  oil  from unlaoding  areas   from
 contaminating the waste waters,  drains are diked and covered  with  straw
 filters.    This   control technique suffers from the possibility  of  storm
 runoff contamination.

 Other treatment  schemes  include  the   use   of  separators   to  treat   oil
 storage   runoff.   The  primary  emphasis here is to treat  runoffs due to
 continual water  running  through the  area.   The  systems generally  are not
 designed to handle increased  loads due to  storm runoff.

 Solvent storage  and maintenance areas are normally  confined  to  build-
 ings.   To  decrease the possibility  of contamination due to operator or
maintenance negligence, these areas are not supplied with drains.

End-of-pjpe Treatment

 End-of-pipe treatment  in this segment of the industry generally involves
the treatment of combined  process  and  nonprocess  waste  water  in  a
primary   sedimentation  basin  or  lagoon.   Once-through,  non-contact
cooling water usually  is not treated even though the possibility  exists
                                114

-------
for  oil contamination from process waste water.  Primary emphasis is on
removal of separable solids from the  nonprocess  boiler  blowdowns  and
water  treatment  wastes  and  from the process washdown waters (if any)
from the soapstone area.

The most effective system although not generally applicable  because  of
land requirements, is the use of judicious water mangement techniques to
minimize  nonprocess  discharges  and  of holding lagoons to contain all
wastes including process, nonprocess, and storm runoff.  Other lagooning
systems used  for  treatment  of  all  process  (including  once-through
cooling  water)  and  nonprocess  waste waters were observed.  Residence
times varied from twelve to twenty-four hours with surface  laodings  as
high  as  12,000  liters/min/sq  meter (1,200 gal/min/sq ft).  Auxiliary
equipment observed included oil skimmers and sludge handling equipment.

From the standpoint of treating  process  waste  waters,  these  systems.
suffer heavily from dilution, particularly in the treatment of grease or
oily  wastes.   Dilution  by  process  streams  was  as high as 75 to 1.
Dilution by heavy  storm  runoff  was  an  additional  problem  at  many
locations.

Synthetic Rubber

In-plant Control

Since  the  synthetic rubber industry is highly technological, involving
many proprietary and confidential processing techniques, many  potential
in-plant  waste  water control methods would call for  radical changes in
processing or  product  quality.   Such  techniques  are  obviously  not
feasible.   However,  some  potential control methods  deserve mention so
that  their applicability may be evaluated.

Crumb Rinse Overflow

It was observed that some  crumb  rubber  plants  generate  crumb  rinse
overflows  which have a lower loading of rubber fines  than  other plants.
Generally, however, such losses cannot be reduced  with  finer  in-plant
screens  since  they are a function  of both the type and the coagulation
properties of the rubber.  One plant did use  a  proprietary  method  to
finish  the  rubber  cement  in  which a water  slurry  is not used.  This
system eliminates the crumb slurry overflow  and  the  contained  rubber
fines.   It  is  not  necessarily  applicable  wholesale to crumb rubber
production, but does merit investigation by industry.

Coagulation Lictuor^Overflow

Most emulsion  crumb rubber processes use an acid and   brine coagulation
liquor.   One  plant, however, coagulates the latex with an  acidpolyamine
liquor which reduces the quantity of total dissolved   solids  discharged
in the coagulation liquor overflow.  The use of this type of coagulation
liquor  is  not  always  possible,   but  if employed could  significantly
reduce the total dissolved solids in the final  effluent.

-------
 Vacuum Systems

 Several plants are converting vacuum systems from steam jet ejectors  to
 vacuum  pumps  for  efficiency  and  waste  water  reasons,  in order to
 maximize the waste water benefits derived from the use of vacuum  pumps
 the  seal  water  should be recycled.  An overflow is generally required
 from the seal water recycle system; this overflow is  normally  slightly
 contaminated  with  oil  but  has  a  better  quality than the steam jet
 condensate.                                                          J

 Caustic Scrubbers

 In some plants, the caustic soda solution used to remove inhibitors from
 some monomers  (notably butadiene)   is  replaced  batchwise.   The  spent
 caustic  soda  solution,  usually 10-20 percent sodium hydroxide, should
 not be discharged batchwise.   It should be containerized and  bled  into
 the total plant effluent,  thereby diluting its high pH, alkalinity, COD,
 and color contributions.

 Carbon Black Slurries
      usual  meth°3  is  to  slurry  the carbon black for addition to the
 rubber with water.   One plant visited employs a steam grinding-slurrying
 technique which reduces carbon black spillage and consequently  washdown
 and  runoff  waste  waters laden with black fines;  this  technique avoids
 the need for carbon black settling pits and the associated  pit  cleaning
 costs.                                                                  3
Latex  spills  and  leakages  occur  from  time to time  in  all emulsion crumb
and  latex  plants,   in most  cases, the  spill is  washed to  the  nearest
plant   drain  using  a  water  hose.   In  many  cases,  this  produces
unnecessary washdown water  and dilutes the  latex  so that  subsequent
treatment  by  coagulation   is  much   more  difficult.   An  alternative
technique  is to coagulate the latex in situ with alum, for example,  and
remove   the  coagulated  rubber   solids  with  scrapers.   The volume of
subsequent washdown water required is  less and the  latex solids  in  the
washdown water are  greatly  reduced.

Baler Oil

As   a result of the high hydraulic pressures involved and the continual
Barring  action of the balers, oil leaks are frequent.  Back-welding  the
hydraulic  lines,   although more expensive as an initial equipment cost,
does  significantly  reduce the occurrence of  baler  oil  leaks  and  can
produce  appreciable  savings  in  baler  oil usage,  in addition, plant
floor drains should be  sealed  and,   if  necessary,  retention  curbing
installed  to keep  leaked oil from leaving the baler area.   Balers using
water as the hydraulic fluid are also  available and are  being  used  in
some  plants;   oil  leakage with this type of machine is obviously elimi-
nated.
                                116

-------
End-of-Pipe Treatment

Emulsion Crumb Plants - Primary

It is normal practice for crumb rubber producers to recycle part of  the
crumb rinse water.  The remainder of the crumb rinse water is discharged
in  order to blow down accumulating fine rubber solids, dissolved solids
and organics.  The rinse water discharge or overflow is clarified before
final treatment in a crumb separation pit.  The  trapped  rubber  solids
are  removed  periodically by scoop.  A very common shortcoming of these
separators is that they are operated,as single units and are not cleaned
frequently enough.  This results in short-circuiting  followed  by  poor
separation.   In  addition,  when  the  pits  are cleaned, the separated
rubber solids are  distrubed  and  rubber  solids  that  had  previously
separated recombine with the pit effluent until the condition of the pit
stabilizes.   Dual pits would solve this problem:  one pit would stay in
operation while the other was cleaned and allowed to stabilize.

Since waste waters from emulsion crumb plants contain considerable quan-
tities of latex, it is necessary to coagulate  the  latex  in  order  to
achieve  a  good  quality  effluent.   Chemical coagulation by itself is
seldom sufficient, because the  density  of  the  coagulated  rubber  is
normally  close  to  that of water.  Therefore, it is customary to add a
"sinker" (clay or limestone) to.the  coagulation  mixture  to  sink  the
coagulated  rubber  and  effect the separation.  For a small waste water
flow, chemical coagulation using (for  example)  alum,  polyelectrolyte,
and  clay  in  a  rapid  mix  tank  can be followed by flocculation in a
flocculator tank.  Clarification can then be accomplished in  a  rectan-
gular  clarifier  equipped  with solids removal equipment.  Larger waste
water flows can be treated in a reactor-clarifier with rim overflow  and
central sludge draw-off.

The collected sludge can be thickened and dewatered before disposal in a
landfill.   Dewatering  studies  on this type of sludge concluded that a
plate-and-frame pressure filter performed well.   The  installed  filter
was  automatically  controlled  for  feed shut-off, filter opening, core
blowout, filter closing, precoating,  and  feed  restoration   (refer  to
Plant J).

One  plant  (Plant K) uses chemical coagulation followed by air flotation
for primary clarification  (6).  Instead of sinking,  the  rubber  solids
are  floated  to  the  clairfier surface with air bubbles and removed by
surface solids removal equipment.  This treatment facility is relatively
new  and  has  had  start-up   troubles,   although   they   have   been
satisfactorily  resolved.   Air  flotation  in this application produces
primary effluent of good quality.

The collected surface solids are pumped to a sludge  impoundment  lagoon
where  they  dry out.  The use of this lagoon is limited and a long-term
solids dewatering and disposal technique will have to be found.

Where adequate land is available,  rubber  solids  separation  has  been
achieved  using  primary   settling  ponds.   Chemical coagulation of the
                                 117

-------
 solids prior to discharge  to  the  ponds  is  usually  necessary.    The
 settled  and floating solids (since both types are produced)  are removed
 from the ponds periodically by vacuum truck or scoop.

 Emulsion Crumb Plants -
 Biological oxidation of the primary  effluent  is  achieved  in  aerated
 lagoons  or  in  activated sludge plants.   Generally, a nutrient must be
 added.  Both technologies obtain satisfactory oxidation of the dissolved
 contaminants;  problems can arise in the clarification of  the  secondary
 effluent.    Good  secondary  clarification  of  effluent from an aerated
 lagoon has been obtained with the aforementioned  air  flotation  plant,
 which  is   a  dual  system with both primary and secondary air flotation
 clarifiers.

 If sufficient  land is available, the effluent from the  aerated  lagoons
 can  be clarified  and stabilized in stabilization ponds.   This type of
 facility is  temperature dependent, of course,   and  performs  better  in
 warmer climates.

 Clarifiers  are  commonly  used for secondary clarification in activated
 sludge plants.   They are generally adequate,  but cases exist where  high
 solids  carryover is a problem.   Secondary clarification can be assisted
 with  coagulation chemicals in  much  the  same  manner  as   for  primary
 clarification,  but the additional chemical cost is high,

 One plant  in the industry,  in an area where water is  in short supply,  is
 evaluating  evaporation   to   remove  waste   water  'contaminants  (7) .
 Satisfactory  operation  has   not  been  achieved  to  date  because  of
 corrosion  and  fouling  of  the  evaporator tubes.   It is  proposed  that
 satisfactory operation can  be achieved with the  use  of  more  effective
 corrosion  resistant materials of construction  as  well as  pretreatm°nt  to
 reduce  the  quantities  of  certain  organics  and sulfides.   Efforts  to
 demonstrate  this  will  be made by EPA-Office of Research and  Development
 during 1973-1974.

 Emulsion Crumb  Plants  - Advanced

 After   secondary   treatment,   emulsion  crumb waste waters  still  contain
 high levels  of  COD.  A high COD  level  appears to   be   a  common   charac-
 teristic of  secondary  effluents  from emulsion crumb,  solution crumb, and
 latex   plants,  and  indicates   that  certain  constituents of the waste
waters  generated  in  synthetic rubber plants are refractory  to biological
 oxidation.

With the exception of the evaporation treatment  described  above,  only
one  other   study  has  been  made   of teritary or advanced treatment of
emulsion crumb rubber waste waters.  This was carried  out  on  a  pilot
plant   scale  using  activated   carbon treatment  (refer to  the Survey of
Plant J - Section VII) .  Approximately 70% of the  COD  remaining  after
secondary treatment was removed  by the carbon.

Solution Crumb Plants - Primary
                                118

-------
Primary clarification of the solution crumb plant waste water is carried
out  in crumb pits.  These pits are similar in design to those for emul-
sion crumb production facilities.  To avoid re-suspending the  separated
rubber solids, dual crumb pits should be used.

Other  forms  of  primary  treatment are not required for solution crumb
waste waters, since uncoagulated latex  is  not  present  and  the  fine
rubber solids separate readily.

Solution Crumb Plants - secondary

Secondary  treatment  technology  uses both activated sludge and aerated
lagoon systems.  Good BOD removals  are  achieved,  but  poor  secondary
clarification  is a problem in most cases.  The reasons for this are not
certain.  A high  level  of  COD  remains  after  biological  treatment,
indicating  that  much  of the waste water constituents are biologically
refractory.

Solution Crumb Plants - Advanced

Advanced or tertiary  treatment  technologies  have  not  been  used  on
secondary  effluents  from  solution  crumb plants.  It is probable that
activated carbon treatment would give COD removals similar to those  for
emulsion  crumb waste water, since the raw waste water constituents  (for
example, traces of monomer) are similar for both types of waste water.

Latex,Plants - Primary

Since latex  plant  waste  waters  contain  uncoagulated  latex  solids,
primary  clarification is assisted by chemical coagulation.  In much the
same manner as for emulsion crumb waste  waters,  clarification  can  be
effected  in  reactor-clarifiers  or  systems  with  separate rapid mix,
flocculation, arid clarification tanks.  Latex waste waters can  also  be
clarified by air flotation.

Latex Plants - Secondary

Activated  sludge  plants  are used for the secondary treatment of latex
waste water.  High residual COD  levels are a problem.  These levels  are
higher  than for either emulsion crumb or solution crumb plants, because
the initial COD loading of the raw waste water from latex plants is much
higher.  It is feasible that aerated  lagoons  and  stabilization  ponds
will  produce  satisfactory  oxidation  and stabilization of latex waste
waters.                                  \

Latex Plants -,Advanced

Advanced or tertiary, treatment technologies have not been used on  latex
waste  waters.   It  is   probable  that  COD   removals  similar to those
achieved by emulsion plants can  be achieved for  latex  waste  water  by
using activated carbon columns.
                                119

-------
Additional  Studies  on  Activated
Waste Water
£l22G Treatment of Synthetic Rubber
Subsequent to the original draft of this  document,  additional  studies
were  performed by the EPA Advanced Waste Treatment Research Laboratory,
Cincinnati,  Ohio,  on  the  feasibility  of  using   activated   carbon
technology to reduce COD levels in synthetic rubber waste waters (8).

Frorn^ the  results  of  the studies it was concluded that COD removal is
feasible.  With the  three  types  of  synthetic  rubber  waste  waters:
emulsion  crumb,  solution  crumb  and  latex rubber, COD removal with a
maximum carbon dose ranged from  50  to  97%.   Estimated  cost  of  COD
removal based on an average removal rate of 70* COD would be $369.00 per
million gallons of waste water treated.
                               120

-------
                              SECTION VIII

               COST, ENERGY AND NON-WATER QUALITY ASPECTS
Tire and Inner Tube Industry

Selection of Control and Treatment Technologies Based on Costs

Two  alternative  approaches  exist  for  the  control  and treatment of
process waste waters from  both  old  and  newer  tire  and  inner  tube
production plants.

The first approach is to combine process and nonprocess waste waters and
to treat the entire plant effluent.  Where land is available, end-ofpipe
treatment  is  the  approach  favored by many of the tire manufacturers.
Generally, the reasons supporting this approach are as follows:
    1.



    2.

    3.
         In older plants, in-plant sewers  for  process  and  nonprocess
         waste  waters are usually combined, thus making combined treat-
         ment more attractive.

         Process flows are usually small relative to nonprocess flows.

         The treatment of nonprocess waste waters has received the  bulk
         of  industry's  attention.   High  suspended  solid loadings in
         blowdown and water treatment wastes are the major pollutant  in
         the combined plant effluent from tire facilities.

However, end-of^pipe treatment systems also have several disadvantages:

    1.   The combined effluent treatment system usually requires one  or
         two  lagoons  for  settlement  and retention.  Lagooning of the
         wastes requires large land area:, which is not readily available
         at many plant locations.       !

    2.   Because of dilution, the effectiveness  of  treatment  for  oil
         removal from process waste water is reduced.  In several of the
         systems observed, oil passed through untreated  (although it was
         present  in  significant quantities), because its concentration
         was below the capabilities of the treatment system employed.

The second approach employed  is control and treatment  of  a  segregated
and  undiluted  process waste water.  This approach has been followed in
plants having partially or  wholly  segregated  process  and  nonprocess
sewers.   This  would,  of  course, include any plant using recirculated
cooling water.  The main  advantages  for  this  treatment  scheme  over
combined endof-pipe treatment are:

    1.   Higher pollutant removal rates.
    2.   Smaller land area required for treatment facilities.
                                 121

-------
 The  primary  disadvantage  of  a  segregated  system
 separate process and nonprocess sewers are required.
approach  is that
 Upon examining these alternatives,  control and treatment  of  segregated
 process  waste  waters  was considered to be most applicable to the tire
 producing industry.   End-of-pipe treatment of combined waste  waters  is
 not  feasible  for pollution control because of:   1)  the ineffectiveness
 of such systems in removal of process waste water contaminants;  and  2)
 the  large  land requirements.   All costs, therefore, are related to the
 treatment of a segregated process waste stream.

 With proper in-plant control, the process  streams  consist  of  readily
 separable  lubricating  and  extender  oils and settleable solids.   Vol-
 umetric flow rates for process waste waters are small.    Therefore,   the
 initial  treatment  applicable from a cost and proven operation basis is
 an API-type gravity  separator.   The  performance   and  efficiency  of a
 gravity separator can be improved by addition of  an  absorbent filter.

 Effluent  quality data for older tire and inner  tube and for newer  tire
 facilities are presented (along with cost data) in  Tables  18  and   19.
 The  treatment technology involves  the isolation  of  wastes with curbing,
 the protection of oily areas to prevent storm runoff contamination,   and
 the  separation  of   settleable  solids and oily  material from the waste
 water.

 A  more  detailed description of  recommended facilities  is  presented  in
 the tire and inner tube portion of  Section IX,  and a flow diagram of the
 system  used as a basis for  costing  is  presented in Figure 10.

 Treatment Cost Data

 Data from Corps of Engineers permit applications  and plant data obtained
 during   inspection  visits   were used  to obtain the average  or typical
 plant size and waste water  discharge flows,  and raw   waste  loadings   as
 described in Section V.

 In   order  to  adequately estimate  the waste water discharge flow rates,
 the plant effluent was divided  into process  waste waters  and  nonprocess
 waste waters.    The  process   waste  waters  consist  of  mill area  oily
 waters,  soapstone slurry  and latex  dip wastes, area washdown waters,  and
 emission scrubber waters, contaminated storm waters   from   raw  material
 storage  areas.   The  nonprocess  waste waters  are sanitary and clean storm
 waters,   utility waste waters such  as  once through cooling water, boiler
 blowdown,   cooling  tower    blowdown,   water   treatment    wastes    and
 uncontaminated  contact cooling  water like tread cooling waters.

 Prom  these data,  a  typical  process waste water flow was estimated to be
 3.785 L/sec  (60  gpm)   for a plant consuming 205,000 kg  (450,000   Ibs)  of
 raw  materials   per   day.    For the  older tire and inner tube  plant sub-
 category the  average  oil loading is  0.246   kg/kkg(lb/1000   Ib)  of  raw
material consumed.  The suspended solids loading  for this subcategory is
 estimated  to  be  0.319  kg/kkg (lb/1000  Ib) of  raw material.  Based on
these typical profiles for old  and new  production  facilities,  treatment
                                122

-------





















CO
H
LU
_J
OQ
1-
































^,
8

i_
CO
0>



c
a>
1_
M-
Ur-
O
I_
O
4-1
3

c
Q)
E
ro
0)
H
S


0)

ro
•^
73
01

03

• ^
4-1
U.








>- o
(D O
•o •—
\ o
V) C
c .c
O 0
4-1 a>
o
'i- *O
4-1 J-
a) , 4-»
E c
o
ir\ o
O
f\\ 1_
™ °

C
O
o
*«D

0)
4->
(D

3
a:
'ro
,^
0.
^

ro
c
O
"^
Q)
(/)
(U
_a








,8 888
lo o o o
CO — OJ J-
O CO VO IfN
CO —
-€0- -««•


















§000
000
o o o
""ION CO^VO* Oj"
N- t— LfN IT\
•«© -6ft-






*•

U)
4-J
V)
o
u
ID
£
ro
c
Q)
4-»
C
ro


4-> C C
«n o ro
i/l O •—
OJ 4-1 O 4-> CO
4-1 m ID c
0) O ID U 4-i
E 4-> a> ro
4-> •— — U !_
ui ID o. o. a)
a> 3 ID a> Q.
> c o d o
"•• ^C
sis
o o
^8^
CM
m-


















8
o
OJ







• — s
(ft
4->
l/>
o
u
L.

o
°-
~O ")
C 4->
ID V>
0
>-"
i_ i_
a) a)
c 3
Q.
c -o
T3 ro
^ ?
0) (U
s«^ C






^"
4->
••—
(D
cy

c

=
^™
»4-

UJ





O
°
CO*
CO
OJ
-*©•






,
3
TO
^



i




OJ
•S3
i/>
0
ro
3 ui
c u
c ai
< 4-
ID H
4-> i-
O 1C
£ o-

-* CO
^ VO 'O
o o
o' o'



















-=t CO
\o j-
< 0 0
* *
^0 0







ro
O ON O
I— J *~~ OJ
1 KN *~~
4-» O* O*
Ul
ro




^ — x
^~
ro
"J2
a)
4-> Ul
— w
3 o ro
ID to a>
!_ 1-
-o «s
co a>
-J£ -0 T3
X. C C
\ a) ro
CO Q.
Jbi Ul —
to o







o
ro
t

Q.
GO


JiJ

•—
rou
C34->
,, , t
Q.U.
<
^^*^
-Q a)
a)o
3 w
"oc
n- ro
^^
I— Q
a)
ro a)
a>o
^
^5M—

O
^^
ceo
i— •—
(D C
•— -C
O O
c/) (U
~™"l~"

._.—


-------





























H

LU
m
rf
1-



































1

{Q,

re
u
J3
3
CO

^*
4J
•«•
^™
"i

c
o
4*J
0
3
T3
O
L»
D-
0)
L.
••»
H

3s
j|)
•£
S
.p
c
0)
u
(U

^ju
•—
O

IH
O
4~
U)
in
S

c

g~
+j
re
Q)
H

u
0)
4->
re
3
0)

in
ro
^g

"S
2
C
»*•
+J
LU












>> o
re o
"O '""""
\ o
u> c
§ -g
4J 0)
1-
u
*•• p^
i_ o
• to
1- 4J
I/)
re o
0
c
O 0)
Q) re
V) C
re a)
•O 4-)
C
re
ry*

in 73
4-1 C C
en o re
§o
o
o
t A A
V OJ -=J"

0?


^
CHV
^
n

o

4-1
C
=
^~
l|.
LU










8 8
i » #»
OJ OJ
OJ
OJ

CO































•S3-



VI
•o
,8
3
^- re
(/) C£
_l

(D
4J >U
(O V)
O CD
O ^

j_
4)
^
o
CL
•o
C U)
re 4->
in
^* O *^~^
D>0 OJ P-
L. (/) 03
d) ^ ^-* *—
C 0) tf) L.
fl) 3 O  CL. in
c ^~* E
OJ 
4J 4J 0) TO
in •— •— u u
a) re o. Q. 0
> 3 re a> a.
c c u o o
~ £
t— C 0)
X O) O
Q) L- ^~ c
> — Q) re re
C 4J L.
LU o re
re
u
AC
\
I- a.^

-* oo
MD O
O O
« •
o o






u
o
•P
03

(D
Q.
a)
CO
^s
•M^
•••

(D LB
L. o»
Q U) CD CO
* C3 ^^
T3 O 0
a» -a c c
•o c j=jc
c re u u
0) 0) (]}
D. — HI—
in •- •—
3 0
CO























































in
t
re
pw>
O
O

*•*
t*""
2>
S
1
CVl

124

-------

-------
 cost  data  were   generated  and are presented  in Tables  18  and  19.  The
 costs  shown for a typical  older facility are based on the worst  case   of
 having^  to  install  a  completely  segregated   sewer system rather than
 isolating  the  process waste water stream from the combined sewer line.

 The  total  annual  costs for the proposed  BPCTCA   and  BATEA  control  and
 treatment   technologies can be interpreted  in terms of incremental costs
 per  unit of production.  Study of the cost  data for a typical older tire
 or inner tube  plant consuming 205,000 kg (450,000 Ibs)  of raw materials
 per  day  indicates that the treatment costs  for  both the BPCTCA and BATEA
 is   approximately  0.59 cents  per  kg (0.27 cents/lb)  of raw materials.
 The  treatment  cost per unit of production for both the BPCTCA and BATEA
 for  a newer tire or inner tube facility of similar size  (205,000 kg raw
 material)  is estimated to  be  approximately  O.U6  cents   per kg  (0.21
 cents/lb)   of   raw  material  consumed.   in other  words  the  proposed
 treatments  will add approximately 6  cents to the  cost of  a passenger
 tire  manufactured  in an  older plant and about 5 cents to the cost of a
 passenger  tire prduced in  a newer facility.

 Investment costs  have been factored  to August 1971  dollars using Engin-
 eering  News  Record  cost  indices.   Depreciation was calculated on the
 basis  of straight-line depreciation  with a  five  year  life and  zero
 salvage  value.

 Designs  for the proposed model treatment systems were costed to  evaluate
 the  ^economic   impact  of  the  proposed effluent limitations.   The design
 considerations (i.e.,  the  influent raw waste loads)   were  selected  to
 represent   the expected  raw  waste load within each subcategory.  This
 results  in  the generation  of cost data which should be conservative when
 applied  to  most of the plants  in this category.   Relatively  conservative
 cost figures are  preferred for this  type of general economic analysis.

 The  capital costs were generated on   a  unit process  basis,  with . the
 following   "percent  add  on"   figures applied  to the total  unit process
 costs  in order to develop  the  total  installed capital cost requirements.
Item
Percent of Unit
Process Capital Cost
Electrical                             12
Piping                                 15
Instrumentation                         8
Site Work                               3
Engineering Design and Construction
 Supervision Fees                      10
Construction Contingency               15

Since land costs  vary  appreciably  between  plant  locations,  it  was
decided  to  exclude  land  cost  from the total capital cost estimates.
Land costs must be added on an individual case basis.

Annual costs were computed using the following cost basis:
                                126

-------
    Item  .           Cost. Allocation

     Capitalization       10 percent of investment
     Depreciation
     Operations and
     Maintenance
     Power
5-yr straight line with zero discharge
value

Includes labor and supervision,
chemicals, sludge hauling and .dis-
posal, insurance and taxes  (com-
puted at 2 percent of the capital
cost), and maintenance  (H percent
of capital cost)

Based on $0.01 kw-hr for electrical
power.
The short-term capitalization and depreciation write-off period is  what
is . currently  acceptable under current Internal Revenue Service Regula-
tions pertaining to pollution control equipment.

All. .costs were computed in terms of August, 1971 dollars, which
pond to an Engineering News Record Index  (ENR) value of 1580.
                                       corres-
Energv Requirements

Energy  input  is related to the need for electric pumps to pump process
waste waters from the plant  area  and  through  the  treatment  system.
Electricity  costs  are  estimated  at  one cent per kilowatt hour.  The
extra power required for treatment and  control  systems  is  negligible
compared to the power requirement of the tire manufacturing equipment.

Non-Water Quality Aspects

The primary non-water quality aspect deriving from use  of a separator  is
the need for disposal of oil and solids.  Additional solid waste results
from the use of a non-regenerative type absorbent filter.

Solid  waste  disposal  is a major problem confronting  the industry  as a
whole.  Typically 3,100 kg  (6,800 Ibs) of solid waste are generated  by a
tire plant each day.  Additional solid waste results from  the  drumming
of  the  waste  solutions  for  off-site  disposal.   Many manufacturing
plants, particularly in the northern states, are finding it difficult  to
locate  and  arrange  for  service  at  satisfactory    landfill    sites.
Fortunately,  the   additional   solid  waste  generated  by  the proposed
treatment technology is very small relative to the  normal  solid  waste
generated by the production facility,  not be significant.


Land  requirements  for  the  treatment   system are small; nevertheless,
certain older facilities located in highly congested  urban   areas  will
find  it  difficult to  allocate   space  for even this  minimal treatment
facility.  These plants may be  forced to  turn to other  control  measures
                                 127

-------
 and/or  to  pre-treat  for  disposal  and discharge  of  the  process waste
 waters to publically owned treatment works.

 Synthetic Rubber Industry

 Emulsion Crumb Subcateqory

 Selection of Control and Treatment Technologies

 Four degrees of control and treatment were considered in weighing treat-
 ment effectiveness  versus cost   of  treatment:    primary  clarification;
 biological  oxidation;   and  advanced treatment  to two  levels of COD re-
 moval.

 Since emulsion crumb waste waters  contain uncoagulated  latex solids,  it
 is necessary to coagulate these  solids prior to  clarification.  The cost
 alternatives for the primary clarification of emulsion  crumb waste water
 have been developed on  the basis of a treatment  model involving chemical
 coagulation,  with a sinking material such as clay to sink the coagulated
 solids.    This,   however,   is  only  one   of several possible methods of
 achieving primary clarification.   Air flotation  is another  approach  to
 primary   clarification   which  as   been   applied to emulsion crumb waste
 waters with  success.  Chemical coagulation has been used to develop  the
 cost data because there are more cases of its successful application for
 this  type  of   waste  water,  and,  therefore, there is less uncertainty
 about the effectiveness of this  technology for this subcategory.

 After primary   clarification,   emulsion   crumb   rubber   waste   waters
 invariably  have high  BOD and COD concentrations.  Biological treatment
 is necessary (and is  commonly practiced by the industry) to remove these
 contaminants.   In order to develop the cost alternatives for  biological
 treatment,   activated  sludge  processes  were used as a model treatment.
 It is, of course, only  one method  for obtaining  biological  oxidation,
 since other  comparable   technologies,   such  as  aerated  lagoons  and
 stabilization ponds  exist  and are  used to some extent by  the  industry.
 The  activated sludge  process was chosen as a model treatment because its
 performance  is   not  as   temperature-  and  climate-dependent  as is an
 aerated lagoon or stabilization  pond  system and   because  the  resulting
 cost  data   are   independent  of   geographic  location.   In addition, an
 aerated lagoon or stabilization  pond  system requires considerably larger
 areas, which are  not  always available.  Activated sludge facilities,   by
 contrast,  require minimal  land.


The   major pollutant  remaining in  emulsion crumb waste waters after bio-
logical treatment is  COD.   Its concentration is  much  higher  than  the
 other principal  parameters and if advanced waste water treatment is to
be carried out, it is logical that the treatment  technology  should  be
applied  to  reduction of the high COD levels.   For the  waste water flow
rates involved in emulsion crumb  rubber  production,  activated  carbon
treatment  is  the only technology currently applicable for COD removal.
In order to prevent blinding of the carbon beds and  columns  with  fine
suspended solids, a dual-media filtration system is required upstream of
                                128

-------
the  columns.   Activated  carbon adsorption of emulsion crumb secondary
effluent has been studied in pilot-scale test equipment.   However,  be-
cause  of  the  technical  risk  with respect to performance and the un-
certainity of the associated capital and operating costs, two levels  of
activated  carbon  treatment  have  been  modeled.  These two levels are
equivalent to overall COD reductions of 75 and 90 percent.

Basis of the Treatment cost Data         !

An emulsion crumb industry profile was made, based on  industry  produc-
tion  capacity  data, to determine the typical size of an emulsion crumb
production facility.  The average, or typical, plant is rated at 128,000
metric tons per year.  The waste water flow for such a plant  would  ap-
proximate  66  L/sec  (1,050  gpm).   The  model  treatment plant, using
chemical coagulation and  clarification  followed  by  activated  sludge
biological  treatment,  is  shown in Figure 11.  The degree of treatment
afforded by this technology is equivalent to  best  practicable  control
technology currently available.  The recommended treatment technology to
attain best available technology economically achievable is presented in
Figure  12.   This  treatment  technology includes dual-media filtration
followed by activated carbon adsorption.

Designs for the proposed model treatment systems were costed to evaluate
the economic impact of the proposed effluent  limitations.   The  design
considerations  (i.e.   the  influent  raw waste loads) were selected to
represent the highest expected raw waste  load.   This  results  in  the
generation  of  cost  data  which should be conservative when applied to
most of the  plants  in  the  emulsion  crumb  subcategory.   Relatively
conservative  cost  figures  are  preferred  for  this  type  of general
economic analysis.

The capital costs were generated on  a  unit  process  basis,  with  the
following  "percent  add  on"  figures applied to the total unit process
costs in order to develop the total installed capital cost requirements.


                          Percent of Unit
                         Process Capital Cost

    Electrical                  12
    Piping                      15
  ,,, Instrumentation              8
    Site Work                    3
    Engineering Design and
      Supervision construction  10

    Construction Contingency    15

The total annual treatment  costs  for  emulsion  crumb  plants  can  be
presented  in  terms  of  incremental costs per unit of production.  The
cost data cited for a typical  emulsion  crumb  production  facility  of
128,000 metric tons per year preduct that the BPCTCA treatment will cost
0.66  cents  per kg  (0.3 cents/lb) of production and that the additional
                                129

-------
   fc
   G

^  uc.
1  <
   on \u
   gfc
   uj a:
   "2
   ul.
   §
  y
  tu
  §
i

_J
iz

<
•z. \
3 !
u. :
U. 1

»
§
u.
'LU
tf>

1
a

0
-
: 2:
3 O
E «e
3 1—
E CO

t
t
1
1
j_|
sis
llg
Si 2
fgl I—
"is
§' =
iiffi
j~
                          130

-------
                        LJJ
                        CD
                        0=
0= Z X
•eC 	 | C3 UJ
CD «K 	 1 — ^-s
vi \— -a co
1— 0 = CD _ I j^
o. — co oe z jJ
>- 4
O
z z 1
••" ^ CO UJ
UJ < • 	 ^ - I—
^ *~ "-1 S UJ
>• \m = rfi S 	 ,. ._ 	 .......^

^ z ^.^ ,,,.°!t, ' -
^ ^ ^ Ss- ' s
^~ r% "- =
^ S o . s

CO «• i/> S S CD UJ
<^^™ *^* ^S r*g ***^
^^C >yt f ** ***^
C5 "J

IH t— C3
•••f ^ It 1
irt ^1 *-r-
51 u
ul co z
O 3 S
^ «/> S V co
Q _l CO
Z_l = <=» •=
^ UJ 1— CO
UJ < g =z
-• t^ = IP
< o I IS
lL s
•t CO
1— CD -=C :
r~ i_ ca
a. S s ;
ICO ac
^a; * * ' '
«c
=:
u_
i
CD
DC
f—
CD





1—
— O
|_ Q
«* c
'





t
1

UJ
H-
m
I—-
CO
3=
«c
CO
CO

CO





CO
Q =3
er — i
r CD
0 CO






eC
=1 CO
JLJ ^_X
£ 0=
UJ
-J 1—
EC —J
=a lo-

co
— J =£
CD -ai
ac I—





CO

CD *C •
CO QQ








CO
lj CO
U_ CO

CO
UJ =D
U- D-





















co
1
0-
co
CO
-EC
CO,
?

131

-------
cost of the  BATEA  treatment will  approximate  0.37  cents   per   kg   (0.17
cents/lb)  of production.
Since   land  costs  vary  appreciably  between  plant   locations, it was
decided to exclude  land cost  from   the  total  capital  cost  estimates.
Land costs must be  added on an  individual case basis.

Annual  costs were computed using the following cost basis:
    Item

Capitalization

Depreciation

Operations and
Maintenance
Power
                         Cost Allocation

                         10 percent of investment

                         5-yr straight line with zero salvage value

                         Includes labor and supervision, chemicals,
                         sludge hauling and disposal, insurance and
                         taxes  (computed at 2 percent of the capital
                         costs) , and maintenance (computed at H per-
                          cent of the capital cost) .

                         Based on $0.01/kw-hr for electrical power.
The  short-term capitalization and depreciation write-off period is what
is currently acceptable under current Internal Revenue  Service  Regula-
tions pertaining to industrial pollution control equipment.

All  costs  were computed in terms of August, 1971 dollars which corres-
pond to an Engineering News Record Index  (ENR) value of 1580.

The total capital and annual costs for the model treatment  technologies
are  presented  for a typical emulsion crumb plant in Table 20, together
with raw waste load and treated effluent quality.

Energy Requirements

The   primary   clarification   and   biological   oxidation   treatment
technologies  require  electrical energy only for operation of equipment
such as  pumps  and  aerators.   The  filtration  and  activated  carbon
treatment system, in addition to power requirements, needs a fuel source
to regenerate the carbon.  The energy and power needs of the recommended
treatment technologies are deemed to be low.

Non-Water Quality Aspects

Sludge  cake is produced by vacuum filtration of the primary coagulation
solids and the digested biological solids.  Sludge disposal  costs  were
based  on  sanitary  landfill.  Sludge incineration costs were not eval-
uated because the economics depend, to a large degree, on  the  accessi-
bility  of  a landfill site and on the relative costs for sludge haulage
and site disposal.  The annual quantities of solid waste generated are:
    Primary coagulated solids
                               2,940 cu m (3,900 cu yd)
                                132

-------



















>,
L.
o
a

re
u
_a
CO
u
V


M 3
C_
U
OQ €
< 3
1- >-
0

c
0

W1
"l
LU













































in
4-J 4)
4) O
EL. o
4J re —
re v o
O **"•• C
1- in o
C 4)
<*- 0 t-
O 4->
in o "o
4) .- _,
4) 1- 4-1
L. 4J C
cn 4j 0
4) E O
0
O 1-
4J O O
c o
0 - 4J
i- co c
4) CM a
M- — S
<4- 4->
— <4- re
Q O 4
>- >• 1-
O 4J
14. .-
u
in re
4-i a.
vi re
O 0
o
c
4J O

4) 4-1
e o
4-> 3
re -o
4, 0
t- Q-
L. r-
4) re
4-J U
o
0
0
Q *»•>
cn
A
•CO-

O
O
0
•»
o r**
CM
•co-









CO
O
o
ICM
§
„
Csl











O

o
< s

^
•co-

11
in
re re

c
-a o
4)

re 4>
E tn
•— re

in
LU












CM

c
4)

in
4>

c
o o o o
o o o o
o o o o
cn cTi \o cr\
Cf\ 0"\ CA CM
CM LT> ro
•co-

ed O O O
O O O O
O O O O
* * * •
CT\CO -t CM
CM lf\ ff\

•co-









o o o o
o o o o
o o o o
o o o o
O O fv CM
CM _fr CM

•CO-










o o o o
o o o o
o o o o
co vo r**» o
— CM — "~

•co-


in
4-J
in
in O
4J O
in
O i-
o 4)
3
4) O
o a.
c
re ~o in
C C 4-1
4) re m
4J C
C >-(-3
•- . cn
ro i- L,
Z 4) 4J
c 3
in -o 4) O
4-1 C C Q.
in o re cn
in o •- c -a
4-> o 4-> cn~ c
in re c TJ 
4-> « re u c
o
0
0
c*t
CM
M
•co-

Q
O
*
CM
—
•co-









0
O
o
o"


•co-










ca
0
o
£
ur\

•CO-
















'


CM
in
4-1
in
O
o

^_
re
3
C
•- C
n <
_ .- 1_ 1- X !-
re CL Q. 4) 4) 4) —
3 re 4) a. — c
c o a o LL
c
re
4J
o









.


(











^
•—
"re
o'
4-)
C
4)

H.
Lu
1






















1=2











o















CO





















L.
0)
4J
1
i
4)
tn

^






^.^
c
o

4-J
O
1
tn i-
1_
4
C
i
n
_
n
a



CO
O
CM"










•*
•
in














o
o
CO












o
CO
CM"








o
o
0
CM



















co
o
o










00
o

o














s
o












o
o
CM








f*^
CM
















CL
.
• ^
; ^
• o
! -^
. ^-<


) CD
O
' O


0
O
CQ



VO

CD










VO
i
O














lf\
vO
C3












oo
CM
—








O
CM












in

•—
"o
CO
T3
4)
T3
C
4)
a.
in
3
CO



00
0
o










00
o
«
o














VO
o












CM

0








o















4)
in
re
4)
-a
c
re

•—
••—
0
























































o
o
vO
vO*


^^-^
c
0

4-J
u
3
-o
o
L.
a.


































C
!••
4J
re
u
u_

1_
re

o
>.

~5
i
j
"o
tj—

c
o
4-1
re

3
cn
§
o
— —
re
u

"E
«

0

in
•—

f^

£
4)
O
3-2
rC

O
O
^
"D
O
a.
o
4-1
C
4-1
re
£
t-
c
0
.g

re
0
4-> "0
C 4)
1 5
S 4J
I- O
I- <

>• in
1- 3
•So.
g C
0 O
4) .-
CO 4J
re
4> I-
O1 4J
3 —
— LL.
co
re
•o —
2"S
(0 Ji_
> 1

4-i "re
O 3
< Q
-Q -D
•o •£>

n S
2. _
,_ PHI
O O
M- M-

< 03
O O

0 0
c c
-C .C
0 0
4) 4)
I- t-

in in
•"" 'T~

ca o

^ cn cn cn
CO
o
_i

3
o
p^
LL.
O
"o
c
-C
u
4)
1—

_


O O
"o "o
c c
SI JC
u u
4) 4)
1— 1-







































































C
0
•—
+•
o
3
-a
4)
i_
o
o
o





ID
1
4)
0
S
3

0)
o
3
•o
0
a.
o
4-1
C
4-J
U,
1-
c
o
_Q
U
re
o
•a
D
re
4-)
O
^

in
3
"a.
o

4-1
re
u
4-1
IZ
LL.

re
•»-
•o
I
i

"re
0
jr
ig
4)
5
_
^_
O
if-

03
Cn
O

0
C
.C
o
4)
H •
C
in O
•— •—
4-J
0 U
3
cn 4)
O ^—
"O 0
c o
J= 0
u
41
1—



































































•
in
V.
re
r~—
H—
O
o

-—
a\
^
in
3
cn
3
«^
CM



133

-------
    Biological  solids

Solution Crumb  Subcategorv
245 cu m (325 cu yd)
Selection of Control and Treatment Technologies

Only -two degrees of control and  treatment have been  considered  in  the
evaluation  of  treatment  effectiveness  versus cost data.  Since latex
solids are not contained in waste waters  from  solution  crumb  plants,
clarification  with  chemical coagulation is not required; clarification
in crumb pits is sufficient.  In addition, after  biological  treatment,
the  residual  COD  concentration  is much lower than is the case in the
emulsion crumb counterpart.  Consequently, carbon adsorption to only one
level of overall COD reduction  (65 percent removal) is reasonable.   COD
reductions   greater   than  this  would  involve  additional  risk  and
uncertainty in the costing processes.

The first degree of treatment proposed includes primary clarification of
crumb-laden waste water in dual-unit crumb pits, followed by  biological
treatment to remove soluble organics.  The cost data have been developed
on the basis of an activated sludge system for the same reasons as given
previously  for  the  emulsion   crumb  subcategory.   Depending  on land
availability,  biological  treatment  could  be  aerated   lagoons   and
stabilization  ponds.   The second degree of treatment consists of dual-
media  filtration  followed  by  activated  carbon  adsorption.   Carbon
adsorption  was  selected  because  it  is  the  most currently feasible
technique for reducing the soluble COD content.

Basis of the Treatment Cost Data

A profile of the solution crumb  rubber industry defined the typical size
of a solution crumb production facility as 30,000 metric tons per  year.
The waste water flow for such a  plant would approximate 15.75 L/sec (250
gpm) .

The model treatment plant using  activated sludge biological treatment is
shown  in  Figure  11.   The  treatment  given by the proposed system is
equivalent to BPCTCA.

The recommended treatment technology to attain BATEA presented in Figure
12, consists of  dual-media  filtration  followed  by  activated  carbon
adsorption.

The  influent  raw  waste  loads upon which the treatment system designs
were based were selected to represent the  highest  expected  raw  waste
load  in  this  subcategory.   The  same cost criteria used for emulsion
crumb plants were applied for solution crumb rubber facilities.

The total capital and annual costs for the  model  treatment  techniques
for  a  typical solution crumb plant are presented in Table 21, together
with the raw waste loads and treated effluent qualities.
                                 134

-------



















>•
O
or
4)
re
U
_a
3
CO

u

rH n
CM J3
0)
S E
ro 3
I- i-
o

§

4-*
D
,__
c
CO








































^
c
1 1 ^
re re
4) 4)
L- >-
I— "^
in

O O
in
4) U

I. *U
C04->
4) 4)
O E
4-> O
C O
4) 0
4) 0
4- PA
14-
•— L(—
Q O

i— ^
O 4-*

O
in re
4-> D-
in re
O o ^
u
c
4-> O
C •""
4) 4->
E U
4-> 3
ro -a
4) o
i» ^
I- 0-
L» ^^
4) re
4-> O
re •—
3 a.
« >.

in
re re

c
•a o
0)
4J T3
ro 4)

•^ ro
j i ^
i/)
ii i



















o
o
o
in col CM
4) |CO
0 —
•— -co-
O
C
.c
o
4>
1—
_
o
u
4-1
c
o
o
i.
o
4-1
c -
(L
E
^_
re
4)
L.

O
O
Ho'
CO
•^O"





































CM

C

f=
in
4)

c

o o o o
o o o o
o o o o
CM VO LA v£>
CO cr> -3-
— CM —

•-
























O O O O
000 0
o o o o
— CM CO • -*
CO vD vO
^-«
•C'V












in
4J
in
in O
4J O
in
O »-
0 4)
3
4) O
u a.
c •
re "a in
c c +J
4> ro i/i
4-> O
c xo
— CTl
ro i- i-
z: o 4i
c 3
in -0 4) O
4-1 c c a.
in o ro oi
in O •— C T3
4-> O 4J Ol— C
in ro c "O (c
O — — — 3
o re o 4-> — >
4-1 4) ro u c
o
o
o
o^
vO
LA

•co-
























O
O
0
LA
CO
• 4) 4> —
3 ro 4) a.'*-' c
c o o o a
c

: re

o
H-
J_
re
-o
c
O














>-
4-»
,-_
ro
3
C?
C.
4)
3

M-
LU














O
4>
CO
4)
Dl
-o
3 •
CO ' CO VO CO —
00—0 CO
rf\ • • • .
CM O O O "O
*
JU

T3
O
r— -

O
v'-
in
4)
4-1
ro
3
4)
4->
in
ro
.3- o LA vo
G"v -d" sO •"• 4)
<-.... in
«vi O 0 P ^C

C£.
I
0
L.
a.

O
4-"

C
a)
E
4-J
re
4)
L-
1-

C
0
-Q
ro
o
-a
4)
4^
re
.>
4->
O


    in
    re
                           o
                           o
                          VQ
o
00
o
CM
LA
CM
                                    CM   O
                      O
                       0
                       3
                      -a
                       0
                  2   4,
                  —   in
                   O   ro
                  CO   4)
                                     •o   "O
                                     c   c
                                     4)   re
                                     o.
                           Q   a   in   —
                           o   o   3   —
                           u   ca   co   o
                    >~   ^  >- o
                    en 4J  en
                    O C  O fr9
                    i— 4) •— LA
                    O E  O SO
                    C 4->  C
                    .c ro -c  4)
                    O 4)  O  O
                    4) J-  4)  3
                    i_ l_ t_ -a
                                                                  in

                                                                  en
135

-------
has  an  annual capacity of  10,000 metric tons, and its waste water flow
approximates 4.4 L/sec  (70 gpm).

The model treatment plant, consisting of chemical coagulation and clari-
fication  followed  by  activated  sludge   biological   treatment,   is
illustrated in Figure 11.  This is equivalent to BPCTCA.

The   recommended   treatment   technology  to  achieve  best  available
technology economically achieveable , presented in Figure  12,  includes
dual-media filtration followed by activated carbon adsorption.

The  treatment  designs upon which the cost data are based correspond to
the highest expected raw waste load within each category.
The same cost criteria used for  the  emulsion
applied to latex rubber.  See Table 22.
                                                crumb  subcategory  were
The  total annual treatment costs for latex rubber production facilities
can be presented in terms of incremental costs per unit  of  production.
Treatment  cost  data  for a typical latex plant producing 10,000 metric
tons per year of latex rubber solids indicate that the BPCTCA  treatment
will  cost  2.51 cents per kg (1.14 cents/lb) of latex solids produciton
and that the BATEA treatment will produce an incremental  cost  of  1.01
cents per kg (0.46 cents/lb) of latex solids production.

Energy Requirements

Since  on-site carbon regeneration is not proposed for economic reasons,
the only power or energy  requirement  of  these  treatment  systems  is
electric power for pumps and other motive equipment.

Non-Water Quality Aspects

Solid  wastes  are  produced  by chemical coagulation and clarification,
wasted biological sludge, and spent activated  carbon.   For  cost  pur-
poses,  it  is  proposed  that  these  all be hauled to a landfill.  The
annual quantities of solid wastes are listed below:
    Primary coagulated solids
    Biological  solids
    Spent carbon
                                  214 cu m  (283 cu yd)
                                   62 cu m  (82 cu yd)
                                  126 cu m  (167 cu yd)
                                                                     the
Neither air quality nor noise levels will be adversely affected  by
proposed treatment technologies.

Detailed Cost Information for All Subcateqories

The  following  pages  of this section contain detailed cost information
used to develop the total capital and annual costs for best  practicable
control  technology  currently  available  (BPCTCA)  and  best available
technology economically achievable  (BATEA) treatment  systems  presented
and discussed in sections VIII, IX and X of this report.  The individual
                                136

-------





























CM
CM

LU
CO
^





















































category
JO
CO
l^
4)
XI
3


X
10



































4-1
c
4-> U
ID >•
£^
H §
M- 4-1
Q
(J
Su
V "•
d) 4J
£ «
CD E
4)
O O
O
s—j
4J O
5 o"
4) "~
M- M-
<4- O
S >-
4-1
L. •-
O U
H- ID
Q.
in ID
4-1 O
in
O c
u O

4j 4^
C U
4) 3
4J O
ID L-
4) Q.
• 	 ,_
ID
I- 0
4-> 'D.
ID >-
4)
4-1 ID
in
5 g.

-0 -0
4) 0)
4-i in
ID ID
£ XI
in
iii























in
4)

o
0
"5
C
l~
u
4)
1-
,.
O
4_l
§
u


0
reatmen't
H-














0
o
o
ol J-'
1 CO
•co-









ca
0
-15
co
•co-









ca
o
o
H-«
i--
PA
vo
•co-








ca
o
J —
\o
PA
•oo-




















o o o o
o o o o
O O O 0

•co-









ca o o o
o o o o
o o o o
ft ft r, *
co r»» o PA
1^ LAO
•co-









ca o o o
o o o o
o o o o
VO - C


0
o
o
LA
UA
•co-




;




O
o
o
M
oo
CA
•co- !

• >
4-1
>,_
1C
Of

4^

o !•—
M-
•— LU
•CO-








o
o
o
tN?
J*
•CO- :




oo P** -4" r*^
• r- o — o
i — d d o











i PA O r~ O
°l j-' d o* d











LA -f LA Jj-
• 00 PA LA •—
""I vO O O O








LA 1^- PA -d"
r — . t** cri PA
* -*' •** o d
^



-,_
01

. C£.
4-> CS| — PA 0
ID LA VO VO Is*
3 ....
4) PA LA LA O
4-> PA
in
S





ts
in •" '
4J C
in ° in
O ~ -o
4-> C C ~ 0- O ' 7» — 4>
in O ID cn " •— in
in 0 — c -o — .5 o O 4J D)'— C ID
in ID c -o ID 3 ' ' in
0 — — •- 3 C 1-
OIOO4J— >- C 4)
4J 4) ID O D1 < 4-
IDQ.Q.4>4)4> •— ' E
3 ID 4) O-'~-' C ID 10
C O O O U.
C

4-> U
O 10
1- Q.
g 00 4)
£- "S °
_ T3 -O
S1 c c
^ 4) 10
•^ 0-
O> o Q 
(D *"""

L- U
1- <
>> in
ID *™"
•D O-
§0 c
. a °
••" 4) •"•
4J CO 4J
ID ID
O 4) 1-
._ Q1 4-1
1*- "D *—
'l- — U.
ID CO
*— 10
O TJ —
4) Tl
xTra s:
-o — —
4) 4-> ID
5 O 3

^
"o xi xi
It—
•o -o
4-J *— ^
ID •— •—
— 00
3 t- >*-
Ol
ID < OQ
O
O >- >•
— o1 o"
10 — —
o o o
•— c c
E x: x:
4) O O
x: 4) 4)
<_> 1- 1—
in in in




10
4)
O

LA
cn
4)
u
3
•o
o

O.
o
4-1
C
§
4-1
2
H
c
o
XI
ID
O
•a
4)
4-1
ID
^
*~"

U
in
3
"o.
o
2
•M
*—
U.

(D
••—
4)
z:
ID
3
O

ja
T3
|
"o
M—
co
>»
0
"o
C
x:
u
4>
• l-
C
O in

4-1
U 0
3
>~ >- >-T3 >-
C7) U) U) 4) Ol
O O O >- O
"o "o "o
C C C
x: x: x:
0 0 O
4) 4) 4)
1- t- I-
1


o 0
0 C
0 -C
.1—
























































•
§

4-1
u
3
•D
4>
O
0
O





















































•

-------
The treatment costs for solution crumb plants can  be  expressed  as  an
incremental  cost  per unit of production.  The cost data prepared for a
typical solution crumb rubber plant  of  30,000  metric  tons  per  year
indicate  that  the  BPCTCA  treatment will cost 1.05 cents per kg (0.48
cents/lb) of production and that  the  additional  costs  of  the  BATEA
treatment  will  approximate  0.85  cents  per  kg   (0.38  cents/lb)   of
production.

Energy Requirements

The  only  energy  or  power  need  is  electricity,   and   electricity
consumption  is  low.   The carbon is not regenerated on-site because of
the unfavorable economics of small-scale carbon regeneration systems.

Non-Water Quality Aspects

Solid waste generation with this treatment  system  is  associated  with
biological  solids  and  spent  activated  carbon.  The activated carbon
canisters may be returned for regeneration  off-site  by  the  supplier.
However,  annual operating data have been based on disposal of the spent
carbon at a  landfill  site.   The  annual  quantities  of ; solid  waste
generated are:
    Biological solids
    Spent carbon
102 cu m (135 cu yd)
140 cu m (185 cu yd)
Air  quality  and noise levels will not be significantly affected by the
operations proposed in these treatment systems.

Latex Subcatecrory

Selection of Control and Treatment Technologies

Four degrees of control and treatment were considered  in  weighing  the
treatment  effectiveness  versus  cost  of  treatment.  These degrees of
treatment are the same as for emulsion crumb  waste  water  and  include
primary  clarification,  biological oxidation, and advanced treatment to
two levels of COD removal.

Latex rubber waste water contains uncoagulated latex solids and the pro-
posed primary treatment   (chemical  coagulation  and  clarification)  is
similar  to  that recommended for emulsion crumb waste waters.  The bio-
logical treatment cost data have been based on activated sludge for  the
same  reasons  as  were  cited  for the emulsion crumb subcategory.  The
advanced treatment cost data were modeled on two levels of  overall  COD
reduction,  87 and 95 percent.  Overall removals greater than 95 percent
would call for undue technical risk, and uncertainty about  capital  and
operating costs,

Basis, of the Treatment Cost Data

A  latex  rubber industry profile was made to determine the typical size
of a latex rubber production facility.  The average, or  typical,  plant
                                138

-------
uni-t  processes  included  in each of the proposed -treatment systems are
discussed in considerable detail in Sections IX and X.

Detailed capital and cost estimates for a typically older tire and inner
tube plant and a typically newer tire plant are presented in  Tables  23
and 24 respectively.

Table  25  to  27  contain  capital  cost estimate breakdowns for BPCTCA
control and treatment for typical emulsion crumb,  solution  crumb,'  and
latex rubber production facilities.

Capital cost estimates are given in Tables 28 to 30 for typical emulsion
crumb,  solution  crumb,  and  latex  rubber  plants which represent the
incremental capital costs required to increase BPCTCA treatment to BATEA
treatment.

Tables 31 to 38 describe the  annual  operating  and  maintenance  costs
associated  with  each  of  the  BPCTCA and BATEA treatment technologies
proposed for tire and inner tube plants and synthetic rubber  production
facilities.
                                          , . • -.         ',.... *
Table 39 lists the major cost bases used.to compute the annual operating
and maintenance costs.
                                  139

-------
                                     TABLE 23
                 BPCTCA and BATEA Treatment Capital Costs for a
                       Typical Old Tire and Inner Tube Plant
                           (ENR 1580 - August 1971 Costs)
                     Daily Raw Material Consumption • 205 metric tons
                 Estimated Total Effluent Flow » 2,004,000 gallons per day
                 Estimated Process Effluent Flow - 86,000 gallons per day
Description of Treatment Facility

In-plant Sewer Segregation
In-plant Process Sumps and Pumps
Process Wastewater Force Main
Outdoor Wastewater Segregation System2
Outdoor Process Sumps and Sump Pumps
Oily Wastewater Storage Tank
Oil Separator
Filter
Waste Oil Handling
Process Effluent Sewer and Monitoring Station
Total Effluent Monitoring Station

       Sub-Total

Site Work
Electrical
Piping
Instrumentation

       Sub-Total

Engineering Fees
Contingency

       Total Capital Cost (Investment)3
Estimated Capital Cost

   $ 89,000
     32,000
     31,000
    116,000
     72,000
      8,000
     52,000
     17,000
      9,000
     18,000
     18.000
   $462,000

     23,000
     55,000
     69,000
     37,000

   $646,000

     65,000
     97.000
                                                                   $808.000
 Includes sealing existing floor drains, installation of new process drains
 and sewers, and oily wastewater retainment curbing
2
 Includes roofing, curbing, and process wastewater drains and sewers
                                    V

 Land Costs are not included
                                            140

-------
                                    TABLE 24
                   BPCTCA and BATEA Treatment Capital Costs
                          for a Typical New Tire Plant
                         (ENR 1580 - August 1971 Costs)
                Daily Raw Material Consumption * 205 metric tons
                Estimated Total Effluent Fow - 569,000 gallons per day
                Estimated Process Effluent Flow •= 86,000 gallons per day
Description of Treatment Facility

In-plant Sewer Segregation
In-plant Process Sumps and Pumps
Process Wastewater Force Main
Outdoor Wastewater Segregation System2
Outdoor Process Sumps
Oily Wastewater Storage Tank
Oil Separator
Filter
Waste Oil Handling
Process Effluent Sewer and Monitoring Station
Total Effluent Monitoring Station

      Sub-Total

Site Work
Electrical
Piping
Instrumentation

      Sub-Total

Engineering Fees
Contingency
Estimated Capital Costs

  $ 17,000
    16,000
    16,000
   116,000
    72,000
     8,000
 ,   52,000
    17,000
     9,000
    18,000
    18.000
  $359,000

    18,000
    43,000
    54,000
    29.000

  $503,000

    50,000
    75.000
      Total Capital Cost (Investment)"
  $628,000
 Includes installation of new process drains and sewers, and oily
 wastewater retainment curbing.
 Includes roofing, curbing, and process wastewater drains and sewers.

 Land Costs are not included.
                                           141

-------
                              Table 25

                BPCTCA  Treatment  Capital  Costs  for  a
                 Typical  Emulsion  Crumb  Rubber  Plant
                   (ENR 1580 - August  1971  Costs)

           Annual  Production Capacity  =  128,000  metric tons

        Estimated  Wastewater Flow  = 1,483,000 gallons per day
 Description  of  Treatment  Unit

 Equalization Basin
 Pumping  Station
 pH Adjustment and Coagulant Feed
 Nutrient Addition
 Reactor-C1 a r i f i er
 Primary  Sludge  Pumps and  Station
 Aeration Basin
 Secondary Clarifier
 Sludge Return Pumps and Station
 Biological Sludge Thickener
 Aerobic  Digestion
 Combined Sludge Thickener
 Vacuum Fi1ter
 Sludge Handling System
 Control BuiIdi ng
 Monitoring Station

     Sub-Total
 Site Work
 Electrical
 Piping
 Instrumentation

     Sub-Total

Engineering Fees
Contingency

     Total  Capital  Cost (Investment)
                  Estimated Capital Cost

                     $  314,000
                         19,000
                         28,000
                          3,000
                        101,000
                         33,000
                        119,000
                        120,000
                         66,000
                         33,000
                        128,000
                         45,000
                         68,000
                         13,000
                         38,000
                         16.000
1
$1,144,000

    57,000
   137,000
   172,000
    92.000

$1,602,000

   160,000
   240.000

$2.002.000
 Land Costs are not included.
                                   142

-------
                              Table 26
                                                     V  '
              BPCTCA   Treatment Capita] Costs for a
                Typical Solution Crumb Rubbef Plant
                  (ENR 1580 - August 1971 Costs)

           Annual Production Capacity = 30,000 metric tons

        Estimated Wastewater Flow = 353,000 gallons per day
Description of Treatment Unit

Crumb Rinse Overflow Pits
Equalization Basin
Pumping Station
Nutrient Addition and Neutralization
Aeration Basin
Secondary Clarifier
Sludge Return Pumps and Station
Biological Sludge Thickener
Aerobic Digestion
Vacuum Fi1ter
Control Bui 1 ding
Monitoring Station

     Sub-Total
Si te Work
Electrical
Pi ping
1nstrumentat ion
     Sub-Total
Engineering Fees
Cont i ngency

     Total Capital Cost(Investment)
                Estimated Capital  Cost

                     $  37,000
                        72,000
                        54,000
                         2,000
                        62,000
                        77,000
                        if 0,000
                        13,000
                        48,000
                        29,000
                        13,000
                        16,000
1
$ 463,000
   23,000
   56,000
   69,000
   37.000
$ 648,000
   65,000
   97.000

$ 810.000
1
 Land Costs not included.
                                   143

-------
                               Table  27

                 BPCTCA Treatment Capita] Costs for a
                     Typical Latex Rubber Plant
                    (ENR 1580 - August 1971 Costs)

           Annual Production Capacity = 10,000 metric tons
         Estimated Wastewater Flow = 101,000 gallons per day
 Description of Treatment Unit

 Equalization Basin
 Pumping Station
 pH Adjustment and Coagulant Feed
 Nutrient Addition
 Mix and Flocculation Tanks
 Clarifier
 Primary Sludge Pumps and Station
 Aeration Basin
 Secondary Clarifier
 Sludge  Return Pumps and Station
 Biological  Sludge Thickener
 Aerobic Digestion
 Combined Sludge Thickener
 Vacuum  FiIter
 Control  Building
 Monitoring  Station
      Sub-Total
 Site  Work
 Electrical
 Piping
 Instrumentation
      Sub-Tota1
 Engineering Fees
 Contingency

     Total Capital Cost (Investment)
Estimated Capital  Cost
$















$




$


49,000
3,000
8,000
1,000
8,000
34,000
4,000
62,000
34,000
4,000
11 ,000
46,000
16,000
42,000
30,000
13,000
365,000
18,000
44,000
54,000
29,000
510,000
51 ,000
76,000

    $   637.000
1
 Land Costs not included.
                                   144

-------
                              Table 28 :
           BATEA    Treatment Incremental  Capital  Costs'
            for a Typical  Emulsion Crumb  Rubber Plant
                  (ENR 1580 - August 1971  Costs)
     Annual Production Capacity  =  128,000 metric tons
     Estimated Wastewater Flow   =  1,483,000 gallons per day
Description of Treatment Unit
Backwash Holding Tank
Filter Feed Pumps
Backwash Pumps
Dual Media Filters
Activated Carbon Columns
Carbon Charge System
Carbon Regeneration Furnace
Subtotal
Estimated Capital  Cost
       $  13,000
          18,000
          20,000
         145,000
         227,000
          23,000
         122,000
       $ 568,000
Si te Work
Electrical
Piping
Instrumentation
Subtotal
          28,000
          68,000
          84,000
          45,000
       $ 793,000
 Engineering Fees
 Contingency
 Total Capital Cost  (Investment)
          79,000
         119,000
       $ 991,000
  Land  Costs are not  included
                                  145

-------
                               Table  29

            BATEA    Treatment  Incremental  Capital  Costs
              for a  Typical  Solution  Crumb  Rubber  Plant
                   (ENR  1580 -  August 1971  Costs)

           Annual  Production Capacity = 30,000 metric tons
         Estimated Wastewater Flow =  353,000 gallons per day
 Description of Treatment Unit

 Backwash Holding Tank
 FiIter  Feed Pumps
 Backwash Pumps
 Dual Media Filters
Activated Carbon Columns
 Carbon Charge System

     Sub-Total
Site Work
Electrical
Piping
 Instrumentation

     Sub-Tota1
Engineering Fees
Contingency

     Total  Capital  Cost (Investment)
Estimated Capital  Cost

      $ 13,000
         7,000
        18,000
        73,000
        88,000
        14.000

      $213,000

        11,000
        25,000
        31,000
        17.000
      $297,000

       30,000
       kS .000

      $372,000
 Land Costs are not included
                                   146

-------
                              Table  30

             BATEA  Treatment Incremental  Capitals Costs
                 for a Typical Latex Rubber'Plant
                  (ENR 1580 - August 1971  Costs)

          Annual Production Capacity = 1.0, ObO metric tons

        Estimated Wastewater Flow = 101,000 gallons per day
Description of Treatment Unit

Backwash Holding Tank
Filter Feed Pumps
Backwash Pumps
Dual Media Filters
Activated Carbon Columns
Carbon Charge System

     Sub-Total

Site Work
Electrical
Pi pi ng
Instrumentation
     Sub-Total

Engineering Fees
Contingency
     Total Capital Cost (Investment)
                 Estimated Capital  Cost

                       $  4,000
                          4,000
                          7,000
                         21,000
                         38,000
                         13,000
1
$ 86,000
   4,000
   9,000
  12,000
   6.000
$117,000

  12,000
  18,000

$147.000
1
 Land Costs are not included
                                     147

-------
                               Table  31

           BPCTCA and BATEA   Operating  and Maintenance Costs
             for a  Typical  Old Tire  and  Inner Tube  Plant

          Daily  Raw Material  Consumption » 205 metric tons

      Estimated  Total  Effluent  Flow  «= 2,004,000 gallons per day

      Estimated  Process Effluent Flow = 86,000 gallons per day


Description of  Cost  Item

Absorbent
Waste Oil Disposal
Sludge Disposal
Labor
Power and Energy
Maintenance
Insurance and Taxes

     Total Annual Operating and Maintenance  Cost
Annual Cost

  $   800
      300
    1,100
    5,400
    1,000
   12,900
    6.500
  $28.000
                                  148

-------
                               Table 32
             BPCTCA and BATEA  Operating and Maintenance Costs
                     for a Typical  New Tire Plant
          Daily Raw Material' Consumption   =  205 metric tons

          Estimated Total Effluent Flow    =  2,00^,000 gallons  per day

          Estimated Process Effluent Flow ,=  86,000 gallons per day
Description of Cost I terns                         Annual  Cost

Absorbent                                           $  800
Waste Oil Disposal                                   .100
Sludge Disposal                                      1,100
Labor                                                5,^00
Power and Energy                          ;           1,000
Maintenance                                         11,700
Insurance and Taxes                                  5.900

Total Annual Operating and Maintenance Cost         $26,000
                                 149

-------
                               Table 33

               BPCTCA  Operating  and Maintenance  Costs
              for a  Typical  Emulsion Crumb  Rubber  Plant

           Annual  Production Capacity =  128,000 metric tons

        Estimated  Wastewater Flow =  1,483,000 gallons per day


 Description of Cost  I tern

 Chemicals
     Nutrients
     Acid/Alkali
     Coagulating Chemicals
     FiIter Aid

 Solid Waste Disposal

 Labor

 Power and Energy

Mai ntenance

 Insurance and Taxes

     Total  Annual Operating and Maintenance Cost
Annual Cost


  $  9,500
    15,700
    29,000
     9,200

    11,700

    39,500

    20,000

    76,900

    38,500
  $250.000
                                  150

-------
                              Table  34


               BPCTCA  Operating  and Maintenance Costs
              for a  Typical  Solution Crumb  Rubber  Plant


          Annual  Production  Capacity   =   30,000 metric  tons

          Estimated  Wastewater Flow    =   353,000 gallons per day
Description of Cost Item
                                         j
Chemicals
     Nutrients                           i
     Acid/Alkali
     FiIter Aid                          :

Solid Waste Disposal                      :

Labor

Power and Energy

Maintenance

Insurance and Taxes


Total Annual Operating and Maintenance  Costs
Annual Cost,


  $ 2,500
    3,500
      300

      700

   14,600

    4,000

   31,100 •

   15.300
  $72,000
                                 151

-------
                                Table 35


                BPCTCA   Operating  and  Maintenance  Costs
                     for a Typical  Latex  Rubber  Plant

              Annual  Production  Capacity  =  10,000 metric tons

            Estimated Wastewater Flow = 101,000  gallons per day
 Description  of  Cost  Item

 Chemicals
       Nutrients
       Acid/Alkali
       Coagulating Chemicals
       Filter Aid

 Solid  Waste  Disposal

 Labor

 Power  and Energy

 Maintenance

 Insurance and Taxes



Total Annual  Operating and Maintenance Cost
Annual Cost


  $   600
    1,200
    2,000
    1,000

    1,000

   14,600

    3,000
   12.200
  $60,000
                                 152

-------
                              Table 36


         BATEA    Incremental Operating and Maintenance Cost
              for a Typical Emulsion Crumb Rubber Plant
          Annual Production Capacity  =  128,000 metric tons

          Estimated Wastewater Flow   =  1,483,000 gallons per day
Description of Cost  Item

Activated Carbon Regeneration
Labor
Power and Energy
Ma intenance
Insurance and Taxes

Total Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs
Annual Cost

  $84,500
   24,500
    9,000
   38,000
   19,000
 $175,000
                                   153

-------
                              Table  37


           BATEA   Incremental Operating and Maintenance Costs
                for a Typical Solution Crumb Rubber Plant
          Annual Production Capacity  =  30,000 metric tons

          Estimated Wastewater Flow   =  353,000 gallons per day
Description of Cost  Item

Activated Carbon Purchase
Spent Carbon Disposal
Labor
Power and Energy
Maintenance
Insurance and Taxes

Total Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs
Annual Cost

  $37,^00
      800
   17,500
    2,000
   14,200
    7.100

  $79,000
                                154

-------
                              Table  38

           BATEA   Incremental Operating and Maintenance Cost
                   for a Typical  Latex Rubber Plant
          Annual Production Capacity = 10,000 metric  tons

          Estimated Wastewater Flow  = 101,000 gallons  per  day
Description of Cost Item

Activated Carbon Purchase
Spent Carbon Disposal
Labor
Power and Energy
Ma intenance
Insurance and Taxes

Total Annual Operating and Maintenance Costs
Annual Cost

 $33,500
     600
  17,500
     300
   5,1*00
   2,700

 $60,000
                                   155

-------
                                Table 39
                  Operational  and  Maintenance  Cost  Bases
  Chemical  Costs

       Nutrients
            Dibasic Ammonium Phosphate
            Ammonium Sulfate
       Coagulating Aids
            Alum
           ,Clay
            Polyelectrolyte

       Filter Aid

      Activated Carbon

      Oil Absorbent

 Solid Waste Disposal  Costs

      Oil Disposal
      Sludge Disposal
           Haulage (10  cu.yd.  dumpster)
 Labor
      Operator

      Supervisor

Power

     Electricity

     Fuel Oil

Maintenance

Insurance
           $100/L.ton
           $ 50/L.ton

           $ WL.ton
           $ 50/L.ton
           $  1/lb.

           $  1/lb.

           $0.30/lb.

           $900/L.ton
           $  5/55 .gal.drum

           $  1/cu.yd.
           $20/trip
          $ 5/hour

          $ 7/hour



          $0.01/Kwhr.

          $0.18/gal.

3.2% of Total  Capital Cost

1.6% of Total  Capital Cost
                                 156

-------
                               SECTION IX

                  BEST PRACTICABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY
              CURRENTLY AVAILABLE — EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
Tire, and Inner^Tube Facj-liti es

Identification of Best Practicable Control
Technology Currently^Available

The  best  control and treatment technologies currently in use emphasize
in-house control of solution wastes with end-of-pipe treatment  of  com-
bined  process  and nonprocess waste waters.  However, as discussed pre-
viously, end-of-pipe treatment of process waste waters after combination
with nonprocess waste waters is considered inadequate.

Of the plants visited, only one plant performs a totally  adequate  end-
of-pipe  treatment  of  all  process waste water streams.  The treatment
facility involves the use of holding lagoons for  combined  process,  and
nonprocess effluents and the re-use of the waste water for irrigation of
farm  land.  The very large land requirements involved keep this type of
treatment from being applied to the industry as a whole.  Other  end-of-
pipe treatment facilities examined were not very effective in removal of
the  oil constitutent in the wastes, due to dilution by nonprocess waste
waters.

There are many in-plant control and treatment facilities.  Kecirculation
of the soapstone solution was considered adequate and  effective.   How-
ever,  the  weekly  washing  and  dumping  of  the system in most plants
reduced this effectiveness.  Oil sumps and separators are common to  the
tire industry, but their effectiveness is reduced by dilution with other
wastes or by improper maintenance.

Since  process  wastes  are best treated before dilution with nonprocess
waste waters and because no plant obtained effective control and  treat-
ment  for  all  the  waste  waters  it generated, the proposed treatment
technology for a typical plant is a combination of the best features  of
various plants examined and visited.

Since  only the loadings vary between the Older Tire and Inner Tube Pro-
duction Facilities subcategory and the Newer Tire Production  Facilities
subcategory,  the treatment schemes described below will be the same for
both.

Basically,' the technology employed consists of:

    1.   Elimination of any discharge of soapstone or latex-dip solution.
    2.   Segregation, control, and treatment of all oily waste streams.
A flow diagram of the proposed system is shown in Figure 10.
                                 157

-------
 Zero discharge  of  soaps-tone and  latex  solutions  is  currently  practiced
 by  production   facilities in each  of  the  subcategories.  Elimination of
 soapstone  solution discharges involves:

    1.   Recycle of soapstone solution.
    2.   Installation of curbing around the soapstone dipping area.
    3.   Sealing of drains in the dipping  area.
    4.   Reuse  of  the recirculating system washwater as make-up for
         fresh  soapstone solution.

 The re-use of the  recirculating  system washwater is the key to zero dis-
 charge of  this waste.   In   emptying the  system  for  cleaning,  the
 soapstone  used should  be   stored in tanks.  The washwater used should
 also be collected  and  stored.    Once  the system  is  cleaned,  stored
 soapstone  can   then be  returned  to the  system  for  use in the new
 production batch.   The collection and  stored washwater can then  be  re-
 used as make-up water to the  soapstone bath during the normal production
 run.

 Eliminating the discharge of  latex  solution is achieved by:

    1.   The use of curbing around  the latex dipping area.
    2.   Sealing of all drains in the  dipping area.
    3.   Containment of all waste waters from the area.

 Several  plants have  already achieved zero discharge by these methods.
 The contained and   collected  wastes   are  disposed  of  off-site  in  a
 landfill.

 Control  and  treatment of oily waste  streams involves segregation, col-
 lection, and treatment of these wastes.  The  wastes  to  be  segregated
 include  runoff from  oil  storage  and unloading areas and leakage and
 spills in  the process areas,  as  shown  in   Figure  10.   Press  and  mill
 basins, when present, are included  in  the  process area.

 To  minimize  the  process water raw waste  load, all process water should
 be isolated from the nonprocess waste  water used in the plant.  This can
 be achieved by  collecting drippings from machinery, the latex  dip  area
 and  the   molding   and  curing  areas,  etc. in sumps.  The sumps can be
 either pumped to the process waste water treatment system  or  collected
batchwise  and  hauled  to  the treatment  or disposal area.  Only as the
 cost benefits would indicate, would ripping out and installing new sewer
 lines be recommended.  Once isolated,  these waste waters  are  collected
 in  sumps  located  in strategic areas throughout the plant.  Waste flows
will be intermittent by nature and, therefore, a sizable flow rate  will
hardly   ever  be   obtained  without   first  collecting  all  wastes  in
centralized locations.  Wastewaters collected in  these  sumps  will  be
periodically    pumped  to  an  API-type  gravity  separator,  where  the
separable oil and solids fraction is   removed.   To  provide  for  large
spills  or leakage  of a major water supply line, a 37,850-liter (10,000-
gal.)  storage tank  is provided.
                                158

-------
Separated oil is removed by a manually operated slotted pipe.  A  decant
tank  is  provided  to  allow  water removed with the oil to settle out.
Concentrated oil-water mixtures are then removed from the  decant  tank,
drummed,  and  sealed,,  and  sent to a-landfill.  Water removed from the
tank is pumped back to the separator.

Settleable solids collected in the separator  are  periodically  removed
and  also,  sent to a landfill.  The separator is provided with two dual-
operating chambers in order, .to provide for uninterrupted .service  during
clean-out.                         ,                 ......

The  gravity  separator  is  provided  with a straw filter to remove any
large oil globules still remaining due to possible short  circuiting  or
unforeseen  peak  overload-  conditions.   Additional  treatment  for oil
removal.is obtained by passing the effluent from the  separator  through
an absorbent filter.                                          ,

Effluent Loadings Attainable with Proposed Technologies  , • -

Based  on  the  control  technology data, obtained from tire manufacturer
sources, and treatment data  obtained  from  industries  having  similar
waste  water  problems,  it ,was determined that the proposed control and
treatment  technologies  are  compatible  with  the  following  effluent
quality for both older Tire and inner tube and newer tire facilities:
          Suspended Solids
          Oil and Grease
          pH         .   .
   40 mg/L
   10 mg/L
   6.0 to 9.0
It  is  expected  that  the  use  of  an API separator will result in an
effluent oil concentration of 30 mg/L.  The use of an  absorbent  filter
will further reduce, the effluent oil concentration to 10 mg/L.

A  reduction  of suspended solids to 40 mg/L will result from the use-of
an API type separator.  Additional  reduction  is  deemed  likely  after
pasage through the absorbent filter.

Effluent  quality  is best expressed in terms of the waste load per unit
of material consumed and is thereby independent of the flow and size  of
the  plant.   Recommended  limitations  for  the  proposed BPCTCA are as
follows:
     Suspended solids
     Oil
0.064 kg/kkg (ib/1000 Ib)  of raw material
0.016 kg/kkg (lb/1000 Ib)  of raw material
6.0 to 9.0
Through  the  application  of  treatment  technologies   equivalent   .in
performance  to  gravity  separation  and  filtration, two of the plants
visited are currently achieving the proposed standards  for  oil.  Table
40,   In addition, four of the plants visited are achieving the proposed
standard for suspended solids.  The plants achieving  the  oil  standard
are both'classified as "new" for the basis of this report.  However, one
of  these  plants  (Plant  D)  is  classified  as  old.  Recent in-plant
                                   159

-------
 O
 10
 tu
J3
 3
 a)
 c
 c
T3
 c
 ID
 i_
>»-
 in
 V
 4-1
 s
 a
 in
3
 tn
 tn
 «)

 8
•O
 C
 ID

 V)
•a
O  ID
O •—
O  1-
  . ID

 •x  ID
 3  E

^ 3
    ID
                              OO     LA    VO    CO
                              o     t~~    J-    o
                              O     O    O    O
                                                                CM
                                                                O
                                                                       LA

                                                                       O
CO


CM
  *

O
LA


O
  •

O
                                            CM

                                            O
    —     n
O  ID     ID
O  —     3
01-    i—
  « 10    4-
  ™  +J    \Jm
  <*  ro    LU
           en
    °    II
                    4-)
              •—     C
            i  ID     0)
            • 4)    4-
          .- 4-"    M-
          ^ |    Ul



          ^£
           en
-d-    ro
f    5    <
 CM    CO
00    g
                                                  co
                                                  o
                                                  O
                    5
                     O
                                                      r~.     O     O    CO    CM
                                                      tM     LTV    VO    VO    I1"-
                                                      O     VO     CM    i-    «-
                                                                t-^           r-    CM     O
                                                                •—     r-»    O    CM     <—
                                                                O     LA    O    «-     VO
                                                                  •      •      •      •       •
                                                                O     O    O.    O     CM
                    VO
                    en
                     o
                     o
                     ro
                     en
                                  o
                                    •
                                  o
                                                                              •—    O    O
                                                                       I*.     O    CM    »-
                                                                       LTN     O    LTV    VO
                                                                                     CM
                                                                                     00
                               r-.
                               in
                                                                                     ~-     <

                                                                                     C>4     Z
           o  ra
           o —
           o  i-
            »  
                               0,O
                               CT>    LA    <
                               CM    VO
                                                                 cv>    J-     «-
                                                                 t—    oo     r~.
                                                                                     VO    »-.
                                                                                     T-     CM
                                                                                     LA     CTl
                                          o
                                          O
                                                       o
                                                       O
                                                                                  cr\
                                                                                  VO
                                                                           •a
                                                                           a)
                                                                           o
                                                                           3
                                                                           -o
                                                                           a)
                                                                           i-
                                                                                                         ID

                                                                                                         V)
                                                                                                         a>
                                                                                                         T3
                                                                                                         c
                                                                                                         ID

                                                                                                         in
                                                                                                         •a
                                                                                                         O
                                                                                                         in

                                                                                                         •o
                                                                                                         a)
                                                                                                         •a


                                                                                                         I
                                                                                                         in
                                                                                                         3
                                                                                                          V)


                                                                                                         s
                                                                                                          n
                                                                                                          i_
                                                                                                          ID
                                                                                                          Q.
                                                                                                          0)
                                                                                                          in
                                                                                               M-
                                                                                                O


                                                                                                1
                                                                                                          (U
                                                                                                          C
                                                                                                          d>      ID
                         in
                         0)
                                                           o
                                                           ID
                                                          b.     LU
                                                                                                         •O      ID

                                                                                                         T3      —      O

                                                                                                                ID
                                                                                                          tn     4-f
                                                                                                          ro      ID
                                                                                                         IS     O


                                                                                                          ID       •
                                                                                                         CC.     <
                                                              160

-------
 modifications -to both manufacturing  and  process  waste  water   treatment
 and   control  facilities were  comprehensive.  As a  result  this  plant can
 be considered in the newer tire  plant  subcategory for analysis  and waste
 water management   purposes.    The  control  and  treatment  technologies
 employed  by  this plant  consisted of  segregation of  oil and  suspended
 solids laden wastes and the use  of local gravity   separators   to  treat
 these contaminated  waste  waters.    Similar modifications in  other old
 plants, would  result  in  similar   performance  levels supporting  the
 selection of the proposed effluent limitations.

 Although  the application of control and treatment  technologies designed
 to reduce oil and  suspended solid concentrations in the   process  waste
 waters  for  both  older  and  newer  tire plants will be similar to those
 employed at Plant  D, the implementation  costs for such  technologies  at
 old   facilities  will,  in general,  be somewhat higher  than the costs at
 newer tire plants.

 Synthetic Rubber Industry

 Identification of  Best Practicable control
 Technology currently Available           ~"~

 In view of the fact that all subcategories of the synthetic rubber  in-
 dustry  are  highly  technical   and  proprietary  in  nature,   it is not
 possible  to  base  effluent  limitation , guidelines  and   standards  of
 performance  on  in-plant  control   technologies  which  might  impact on
 processing procedures and product quality.   Instead,  these  guidelines
 have  been  formulated around the best practicable  end-of-pipe  treatment
 technologies employed by the synthetic rubber  industry.    In   order  to
 achieve  the  contaminant reductions recommended for this  guideline, the
 synthetic  rubber  industry  will  require   better   housekeeping   and
 maintenance  practices, as well  as in-plant processing modifications, to
 assist  the  end-of-pipe  treatment  plant  in  attaining   the  required
 reductions.   The  effluent  limitations have been based on the effluent
quality and  contaminant  removal  efficiencies  of  well   designed  and
 properly-operated treatment facilities.

 Emulsion Crumb Subcategory

The  coagulation liquor and crumb rinse overflow stream should be passed
through crumb pits to remove crumb rubber fines.   These pits  should  be
dual units so that good crumb separation can be achieved during pit unit

cleaning   operations.    Figure  11  shows  a  hypothetical  end-of-pipe
secondary treatment facility applicable to  the  treatment  of  emulsion
crumb  waste  waters.    This treatment includes chemical coagulation and
clarification,  and  biological  treatment.    The   total  plant  effluent
should  be passed through an equalization basin,  providing  approximately
21 hours detention, to smooth out  waste  load  peaks  and  to  equalize
hydraulic flow.   The equalization basin should be aerated to insure good
mixing,   prevent  anaerobic  conditions,   and -assist  in the biological
oxidation process.
                                 161

-------
From the equalization basin, the waste waters are  pumped  to  a  mixing
basin,  where  the pH of the waste waters is adjusted to achieve optimum
coagulation conditions.  The desired pH value is  approximately  neutral
(pH  =  7)  and  is  suitable  for biological treatment with no changes.
Nutrients to facilitate biological treatment will also be added in  this
basin.

After  pH  adjustment,  the  waste waters flow into a reactor-clarifier,
where coagulating chemicals  (alum and polyelectrolyte) are added in  the
reactor  compartment.   A  clay slurry is also added, to weight down the
coagulated rubber solids.   The  waste  water  flows  from  the  reactor
compartment to the clarifier, where the settleable solids and coagulated
solids  settle and are removed.  The clarified waste water overflows the
clarifier and enters the biological  treatment  system.   The  clarified
waste  water  flows  into  aeration  basins  where it is well mixed with
biological solids.  Microorganisms synthesize new biological solids from
organic matter contained in the waste water.  At  the  same  time,  some
soluble  matter is consumed for energy purposes using oxygen supplied by
aerators in the basin.  The result is that soluble material is converted
to insoluble biological solids  and  the  BOD  of  the  waste  water  is
reduced.  The mixed liquor containing biological solids suspended in the
waste water overflows the aeration basin to the secondary clarifier.

The  solids  in the mixed liquor are settled in the secondary clarifier,
and  the  clarified  waste  water  overflows  and  enters  an   effluent
monitoring  station, where the flow is recorded and an automatic 24-hour
composite sample is collected.

Part of the settled biological solids is returned to the aeration basins
to maintain the mixed liquor solids concentration in the basin.  The re-
mainder of the bio-solids must be wasted from the system as a sludge.

The waste sludge is first thickened in  a  gravity  thickener  with  the
supernatant returning to the head of the aeration basins.  The thickened
sludge underflow enters an aerobic digester, where the biological sludge
is  wasted  by endogenous respiration utilizing oxygen to aerate and re-
duce the bio-solid  bulk.   This  process  is  referred  to  as  aerobic
digestion.

This  digested  sludge  is then mixed with the primary solids underflows
from the reactor-clarifier unit and enters a secondary  thickener.   The
clear  supernantant from this thickener is also recycled to the aeration
basins.  The thickened underflow is then discharged to a  vacuum  filter
for further conditioning and concentration.

A  drum-type  vacuum  filter separates thickened sludge into a dewatered
cake, which discharges by belt conveyor to a dumpster  bin  and  into  a
filtrate  that  is recycled to the aeration basin.  The dewatered sludge
cake is biologically stable  and  can  be  disposed  of  at  a  sanitary
landfill.   Filter  aid  and precoat preparations are used to assist and
maintain the quality of the filtrate.

Solution Crumb Subcategory
                                162

-------
The plant waste waters are first passed through  crumb  pits  to  remove
rubber  crumb  fines.   As  previously  noted  in  the discussion of the
emulsion crumb subcategory, these pits should be dual units.

Figure 11 represents  a  hypothetical  secondary  treatment  alternative
which is applicable to solution crumb rubber waste waters, as well as to
the  emulsion  crumb  waste waters previously discussed.  Since solution
crumb waste waters do not contain uncoagulated latex solids, and if ade-
quate separation of the rubber fines has  been  achieved  in  the  crumb
pits, neither the chemical coagulation process nor the primary clarifier
is  required.   The  waste waters can then pass from the pH and nutrient
addition basin directly into the aeration basin (refer  to  Figure  11).
In  addition, since there are no primary solids, the second thickener is
not necessary and the wasted biological sludge passes directly from  the
digester to the vacuum filter.  The solution crumb secondary waste water
treatment  facility is similar to the emulsion crumb waste waters in all
other aspects.

Latex Subcategory

The model secondary waste water treatment facility illustrated in Figure
11 is also applicable at latex rubber plants.  Since latex  plant  waste
waters contain uncoagulated latex solids, primary clarification assisted
by  chemical coagulation is required.  However, because latex plants are
considerably smaller than emulsion crumb plants, the  waste  water  flow
rate  is  much lower.  The lower flow rates indicate the use of separate
rapid-mix,  flocculatbr,  and  clarifier  units,  since  small  reactor-
clarifiers  are  not  practicable in small diameters due to reduction in
efficiency, mixing, and settlement of solids.

Other than this basic difference (due to flow rate only) in  the  design
of the primary clarification equipment, the secondary treatment facility
for latex plant waste waters is identical to that described for emulsion
crumb waste water.

Effluent Loadings Attainable
with Proposed Technologies

Emulsion Crumb subcategory

Based on raw waste load and the control and treatment data from emulsion
crumb  plants, it was determined that the described proposed control and
treatment technologies are compatible with  in  the  following  effluent
quality:
          COD
          BOD
          Suspended solids
          Oil and Grease
          pH
500 mg/L
 25 mg/L
 40 mg/L
 10 mg/L
6.0 to 9.0
The  effluent  waste  loads, resulting from the application of treatment
technologies equivalent to chemical coagulation with  clarification  and
                                 163

-------
biological  treatment,  constitute  the  best  practicable  control  and
treatment technology standards  currently  available  for  the  emulsion
crumb subcategory.  Recommendations for proposed limitations are:
          COD
          BOD
          Suspended Solids
          Oil and Grease
          PH
8.00 kg/kkg(lb/1000 Ib)
0.40 kg/kkg(lb/1000 Ib)
0.65 kg/kkg(lb/1000 Ib)
0.16 kg/kkg(lb/1000 Ib)
6.0 to 9.0
                        of product
                        of product
                        of product
                        of product
Table  HI  presents  the  raw  waste  and  final  effluent loads for the
exemplary plants producing various emulsion crumb  products.   Data  was
obtained by plant visits and company historical records.  Although three
plants  were  sampled,  six  cases  of  emulsion  crumb  production were
studied.

The  proposed  BOD,  suspended  solids,  and  oil  and  grease  effluent
limitations  for  BPCTCA  are  commensurate with the calculated effluent
loads achieved by the selected  plants.   The  values  of  the  proposed
limitations  for  BOD, suspended solids, and oil and grease are based on
typical industry waste water flow rates, calculated raw waste loads, and
established performance characteristics (concentrations) of conventional
biological treatment systems.

The proposed COD effluent limitation  for  BPCTCA  is  higher  than  the
normal  COD  effluent  load  from  the  selected plants.  This value was
conservatively selected in order to produce  effluent  limitations  that
reflect  minor  processing variations and climatic conditions.  Since in
practice the effluent  COD  from  a  biological  treatment  facility  is
essentially independent of the treatment design and operation, it is not
feasible  to  develop  COD  limitations  for  a  control  and  treatment
technology, namely  biological  treatment,  that  does  not  effectively
remove  COD.   The  important  parameters associated with the BPCTCA are
therefore BOD, suspended solids, oil and grease.


Solution Crumb Subcatecrorv

Industry raw waste load and the control and treatment data indicate that
proposed control and treatment technologies for  solution  crumb  rubber
waste water are compatible with the following effluent quality:
          COD
          BOD
          Suspended Solids
          Oil and Grease
          PH
245 mg/L
 25 mg/L
 40 mg/L
 10 mg/L
 6.0 to 9.0
Effluent quality can also be expressed in terms of effluent waste loads,
which  are independent of waste water flow.  These effluent waste loads,
resulting from the application of treatment technologies  equivalent  to
primary  clarification  and  biological  treatment,  constitute the best
practicable control and treatment technology standards currently  avail-
                                  164

-------

O1
:*
5
c
I)
1]
<4-
LU


CM
O
O


3 o
O i^


CM
O
O


° °
O O
O  2
             C?
                        en


                        o






VI
4->
C
ID
»"•
CU
•§

u
o
c
o
VI
E
UJ
u
£

I
w

CM"
CO
CO

4->
c

it
UJ

5
o




1
.
tn



|
o

§
ca

4J
c
1
4-
H-
ii i


VO
CM
C5


(TJ
ce

Z

°. ^
O ««




o •—
CM «-^



S 3
•^ •**
C3 C3


cn tn
CM CM

VO
O




*
m



LA
O


cS
CM

tn
CM




<
Z



LA
0


0?
CM

O
CM




*
v_
*-
'

LA
O


0?
CM


H
"*
3
CO


1

4J
C
3
E
UJ
1
^

v.
a
^
§
u

4-1
§

It.
14-
LU
VO
cn
t




3
£
cn
^~
» ^
tA LA



tn vo
CM ^
CM cn
CM «-
s.




R
oo
vo
en
•




"cvj
cn
CM
s




CO
LA
CM
•o
C
ID
Ul
•o
J
_J
0)
w
5
3





I
n


^
^_

o
o
o
f—
•^
g.
r>




f
co
^T
^—1 *
8
c^
LA


^^.
O
CM
CM
CM
***>
O
O
LA
OO



O
a
CM

8
LA
oeT



o
8
_
SvX
o
o

vo"



s
CC^

^^
g
LA
LA



O
^
s-*
o
o
IA
LA
                      0)
                     T3

                      C
 L.


£,

C£.
CO
Z

T3
 C
 ID

CC
CO
CO
                       S    U    •£
                       LU    -0     ID -O
                                   O  0)
              •a     4J
               0)     1.    _
              •a     ID    •—
               C     O-    O
4-J    C£
X    co
UJ    CO
4J
 c
 ID

SI
                           ce
                           CO
                           CO
                           xi.
T3  C
 c  o

 10  S
—  LU

"O  H.

a:  ID
co  —
co  co
co
CO I
                                                     H
                                                     •o
                                                      cc
                                                      CO
                                                      CO


















































W
l_
Q)
•M



•M
tn
i

>•
._
IM
•M
3

tn
Q)
1 nc 1 ud
^-



i
o
•D
 O
O 3
•o
§2
CL


tn o
ID
ca en
.^
0) en


ID CO
— o

ID CM
ID 4->
ID
4-J
O T3
4J
ID ffl
ID —

in
u a)

4- l/l
oi
CX CO
CO CO
m























































•
0}
JD
ID

ID
ID
4-1
O
c

ID
4-1
ID
a
z*
                                                     165

-------
able  for  the solution crumb subcategory.
limitations are:
               Recommendations for proposed
          COD
          BOD
          Suspended Solids
          Oil and Grease
          PH
3.92 kg/kkg(lb/1000 Ib)  of product
O.UO kg/kkg(lb/1000 Ib)  of product
0.65 kg/kkg(lb/1000 Ib)  of product
0.16 kg/kkg(lb/1000 Ib)  of product
6.0 to 9.0
The raw waste and final  effluent  loads  for  selected  solution  crumb
rubber plants are given in Table 42.  Five plants were visited and eight
types of solution crumb product were sampled.

Since  most  solution crumb is produced at the same location as emulsion
crumb  rubber,  it  was  necessary  to  calculate  the  raw  waste  load
contribution  of  solution  crumb  process in the treatment system final
effluent.  The values of the proposed  limitations  for  BOD,  suspended
solids,  and oil and grease, therefore, are based on typical waste water
flow rates, calculated raw  waste  loads,  and  established  performance
characteristics   (concentrations)  of  conventional biological treatment
systems.  The limitations proposed for  suspended  solids  and  oil  and
grease, are in general agreement with the effluent loads achieved by the
selected plants.  The BOD limitation, however, is marginally higher than
the effluent loads produced by some of the cited plants.  Since the best
BOD  effluent  load  achievable  by  a  solution  crumb  rubber plant is
dependent on the waste water flow and the inherent  process  limitations
of biological treatment, an effluent limitation has been recommended for
BOD  corresponding  to  the  effluent  quality  of  a  well designed and
operated biological treatment facility.

The proposed COD effluent limitation for BPCTCA is higher than  the  COD
effluent  from  many of the selected plants.  This value was selected as
conservative in order to produce effluent limitations that reflect minor
processing variations and climatic conditions  throughout  the  country.
The salient parameters for the BPCTCA are BOD, suspended solids, oil and
grease, and pH.

Latex Subcatecrorv
Raw  waste  load  and  the control and treatment data do not demonstrate
adequate treatment of the waste water from  the  selected  plants.   The
below   listed   performance   characteristics  are  imposed  upon  this
subcategory as justified by established performance  characteristics  of
conventional biological and chemical coagulation systems.
          COD
          BOD
          Suspended Solids
          Oil and Grease
          pH
500 mg/L
 25 mg/L
 HO mg/L
 10 mg/L
6.0 to 9.0
                                  166


-------
Effluent quality can also be expressed in terms of effluent waste loads,
which  are independent of waste water flow.  These effluent waste loads,
resulting from the application of treatment technologies  equivalent  to
primary  clarification  with chemical coagulation followed by biological
treatment,  constitute  the  best  practicable  control  and   treatment
technology   standards   currently   available   for  the  latex  rubber
subcategory.  Recommendations for proposed limitations are:
          COD
          BOD
          Suspended Solids
          Oil and Grease
          PH
6.85 kg/kkg(lb/1000 Ib)  of product
0.34 kg/kkg(lb/1000 Ib)  of product
0.55 kg/kkg(lb/1000 Ib)  of product
0.1 a kg/kkg(lb/1000 Ib)  of product
6.0 to 9.0
The raw waste and final effluent loads for two selected latex rubber
plants are given in Table H3.
                                 168

-------
              vO
         in
               o
1—
V»
4-J
c
to
OL
u
(1)
-O
ja
3
££
X
5

I.
o
<*-
£
ro


c
'1
HI
M-
UJ

1
•a
c
ra

V)
•o
s
(U
4J
VI


2
5


2
0
f-
* vO



O

_*
•^
a
t
o
CO



+J
c
0)


14-
>4-
Ul

in


o




3

*
vO

in


1

CT
.*
a
o
o









,§
u.





4->
C
1

4-
UJ
-'.
"ro
0) 0
•— o

O) ^*

~>,
en
vo
in


j.
^*

CM




0

in

-.
*
vO



CVI
in
m
tr\



O
o

«

o
o
in
CM
^-

                                                                                                  O
                                                                                                         •   "ro

•—     ra


4J     O
 3     C

     4-1
TJ     ra
 3    o



—    <
                                               169

-------

-------
                               SECTION X

                 BEST AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY ECONOMICALLY
                   ACHIEVABLE — EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
Tire and Inner Tube Indus-try

Effluent limitations commensurate with best available technology econom-
ically achievable and best practicable  technology  currently  available
are identical for the tire and inner tube subcategory.

Complete  water reuse (zero discharge) for this industry does not appear
feasible.  Treatment of the  waste  water  to  approach  influent  water
quality  in a recycle system requires removal of oils, suspended solids,
total dissolved solids and trace contaminants that cannot  be  justified
on a technical, cost or benefit basis.

Synthetic Rubber Industry

Identification of Best Available Technology Economically
Achievable                        ~

After  review  of the data and control and treatment technologies, it is
clear the principal pollutant load after biological treatment,  for  all
subcategories  in  the  synthetic  rubber  industry, is due to COD.  The
other parameters (BOD, suspended solids, and oil and grease) are reduced
to comparatively low levels.  Therefore, advanced  treatment  should  be
addressed to COD removal and reduction.

None  of  the  end-of-pipe  systems observed in use by this industry was
considered completely adequate  for  establishing  effluent  limitations
commensurate with the best available technology economically achievable.

Emulsion Crumb Subcateororv

After  biological  treatment,  emulsion crumb waste waters have low BOD,
suspended solids, and  oil  and  grease  concentrations,  and  high  COD
concentrations   (up to 500 mg/L).  The most feasible technique to reduce
residual COD content after biological treatment is by using an activated
carbon adsorption technique.  This technology has been studied in  pilot
scale  apparatus  using  as feed stock emulsion crumb waste waters which
had been subjected to secondary treatment.  After treatment with carbon,
the resultant COD level was reduced to about 130 mg/L.  Further  studies
by  EPA,  NERC, Cincinnati showed that reductions of COD levels up to 70
percent are technically and (potentially):economically achievable.  This
degree of removal has been used to establish  COD  effluent  limitations
and standards of performance for the emulsion crumb subcategory.


Figure  12  shows a hypothetical advanced waste water treatment facility
using activated carbon treatment to achieve COD  removals  adequate  for
best available technology economically achievable.
                                  171

-------
The  secondary effluent discharges into a holding tank which is normally
maintained full by a level-control signal to the feed pumps.   The  feed
pumps  produce  sufficient line pressure to pump the waste water through
the dual multi-media filters and the carbon columns.

The waste water is first  filtered  to  remove  the  residual  suspended
solids  from  the secondary treatment.  Filtration before the carbon bed
will prevent fine particles from plugging the  carbon.   The  filtration
media  used generally are anthracite and fine graded sands.  The filters
are dual or multiple units depending on the waste water  flow  rate  and
standard equipment sizes available.  Periodically, these filters require
backwashing  indicated by a pressure buildup upstream or a pressure drop
across the filter bed.  When filter backwashing is necessary,  the  feed
is  switched to the dual unit, the backwash pumps are activated, and the
unit undergoes the complete backwash cycle.  Backwash  water  containing
trapped  solids  is  piped  to  the  aeration  basins  of  the secondary
treatment facility.  The backwash cycle usually includes  an  air  scour
and  a  final  service flow period for resettlement of the filter media.
The flow rate during the backwash  cycle  is  considerably  higher  than
during the normal service cycle and therefore requires a holding tank of
sufficient  capacity  to  furnish  the  necessary water for the backwash
operation.

The filtered  waste  water  flows  down  through  the  activated  carbon
columns.   Depending  on the waste water flow rate, two or more parallel
carbon bed columns may be required.  Due to solids buildup in the carbon
columns,  periodic  backwashing  is  also  required.   Each  column   is
backwashed  when  the  pressure drop across the column exceeds a pre-set
value.  The backwashing water is discharged to the  aeration  basins  of
the secondary treatment facility.

The  carbon  in the columns is replaced with fresh or regenerated carbon
when its activity is depleted.  This is  indicated  by  breakthrough  or
leakage  as  detected  in an automatic total carbon analyzer.  The spent
carbon is discharged to a spent carbon storage bin, and a regenerated or
fresh charge of carbon is provided to the columns from a charge hopper.

The effluent from the carbon bed columns has  low  COD,  BOD,  suspended
solids,  and  oil  and  grease.   The flow of this effluent is monitored
through a monitoring station where a 24 hour composite  sample  is  col-
lected.

In  most emulsion crumb plants, the carbon usage is sufficiently high to
justify on-site regeneration.  Regeneration may be  carried  out  in  an
oilfired, multiple-hearth furnace.  The spent carbon is continuously fed
from  the  spent carbon storage bin to the furnace.  The regenerated and
cooled carbon is then returned to a carbon charge hopper  and  is  ready
for  recharging.   Overflow  carbon  quench  and  slurry waters from the
regeneration  process  are  carbon  (to  replace  carbon   lost   during
unloading,  transfer,  loading, and regeneration)  is added at the charge
hopper.  Losses normally amount to approximately 5 to 8 percent  of  the
regenerated carbon weight.
                                172

-------
In smaller emulsion crumb production facilities, carbon usage is low and
on-site regeneration may not be feasible.  The carbon can then either be
returned to the supplier for regeneratiqn or can be disposed of as solid
waste in a landfill site.

Solution grumb Subcatecrorv               I

The  hypothetical advanced waste water treatment facility illustrated in
Figure 12 is also applicable to a secondary effluent from solution crumb
waste  water.   The  illustrated  facility  will  produce  an   effluent
satisfactory for best available technology economically achievable.

Although  this  technology  has  not been used by plants in the solution
crumb subcategory, it has been  studied  for  emulsion  crumb  secondary
effluent.   Because  of the many similarities between solution crumb and
emulsion crumb waste water  (e.g., use of the same monomers  and  similar
processing  techniques  by  the  two subcategories), it is reasonable to
propose this advanced treatment technology for secondary solution  crumb
waste  water.   The level of treatment representative of this technology
has been confirmed by the EPA National  Environmental  Research  Center,
Cincinnati, Ohio.

The  advanced  treatment  facility for solution crumb is similar to that
for emulsion crumb, except  that  in  most  cases  the  carbon  will  be
disposed  of  or  regenerated off-site, instead of being regenerated on-
site.  This is due primarily to the fact that solution crumb plants  are
generally  smaller  than  emulsion  crumb  plants,  and  on-site  carbon
regeneration is not judged to be economically feasible at this level  of
cost analysis.                           ;

Latex Subcategory

Again,   the   hypotehtical  advanced  waste  water  treatment  facility
illustrated in Figure 12  is  recommended  for  treatment  of  secondary
effluent  latex  rubber  wa'ste waters.  This facility corresponds to the
proposed best available  technology  echomically  achievable  for  latex
rubber plants.

This  technology  has  not  been used by latex rubber plants, but it has
been studied, for the advanced treatment of secondary effluent  emulsion
crumb  rubber  waste  waters.   There are many similarities in materials
used  and  processing  operations  between  latex  and  emulsion   crumb
production,  and  hence similarities in their waste waters.  Differences
tend  to  revolve  around  the  level  of  loadings  rather   than   the
characteristics  and  constituents.   It  is,  therefore,  reasonable to
recommend this advanced  treatment  technology  for  secondary  effluent
latex  rubber  waste  waters.  The level of treatment attainable by this
technology has been confirmed by the EPA National Environmental Research
Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.  The hypothetical facility will be similar  to
that proposed for emulsion crumb waste waters.

Effluent Loading Attainable with Proposed Technologies
                                 173

-------
 Emulsion Crumb Subcatecrory

 Based  on secondary -treatment data and pilot studies of activated carbon
 adsorption,  the proposed control and treatment technologies will  result
 in effluent  quality better than or equal to the following values:
                COD          -
                BOD
                Suspended Solids
                Oil and Grease
                pH
     130 mg/L
       5 mg/L
      10 mg/L
       5 mg/L
       6.0 to 9.0
 The  proposed   treatment  will  probably  produce  an effluent of higher
 quality for BOD,  Suspended Solids,  and Oil and  Grease  than  the  above
 values.   However,   the  resultant   limitations  on these parameters are
 governed by the accuracy of the  analytical methods.

 Effluent quality  can also be defined in terms  of effluent  waste   loads,
 The  effluent   waste  loads,  resulting from the application of treatment
 technologies equivalent to multi-media filtration and  activated   carbon
 adsorption,   constitute   the  best  available  treatment  economically
 achievable for  the  emulsion crumb subcategory.   The  proposed limitations
 are as  follows:
               COD
               BOD
               Suspended Solids
               Oil and Grease
               pH

Solution Crumb Subcateqory
2.08 kg/kkg(lb/1000 Ib)  of product
O."08 kg/kkg(lb/1000 Ib)  of product
0.16 kg/kkg (Ib/1000 Ib)  of product
0.08 kg/kkg(Ib/10 0 0'Ib)  of product
6.0 to 9.0
Industry secondary treatment data and data extrapolated  from the  pilot-
scale activated carbon adsorption studies on secondary effluent emulsion
crumb  waste  waters  were  used  to  quantify  the  effluent quality of
solution crumb waste waters following advanced treatment.  The  effluent
quality is given as follows:
                COD
                BOD
                Suspended Solids
                Oil and Grease
                pH
     130 mg/L
       5 mg/L
      10 mg/L
       5 mg/L
       6.0 to 9.0
The  effluent  values  for BOD, Suspended Solids, and oil and Grease are
dictated by the lower limit  of  accuracy  for  the  currently  accepted
analytical methods.

The  effluent waste loads following multi-media filtration and activated
carbon adsorption constitute the best available  treatment  economically
achievable for the solution crumb subcategory.  The proposed limitations
are as follows:
                                 174

-------
                COD
                BOD
                Suspended Solids
                Oil and Grease
                                    2.08 kg/kkg(lb/1000 Ib)
                                    0.08 kg/kkg(lb/1000 Ib)
                                    0.16 kg/kkg(lb/1000 Ib)
                                    0.08 kg/kkg(lb/1000 Ib)
                                    6.0 to 9.0
of product
of product
of product
of product
Latex Subcategorv

Latex  industry  secondary  treatment  data  and  data extrapolated from
studies on the activated carbon adsorption treatment of  emulsion  crumb
secondary  effluent  were  used  to  formulate  the  following  effluent
qualities;
                COD
                BOD
                Suspended Solids
                Oil and Grease
                pH
                                         130 mg/L
                                           5 mg/L
                                          10 mg/L
                                           5 mg/L
                                           6.0 to 9.0
                                                                     are
The effluent levels for BOD, Suspended Solids, and Oil  and  Grease
dependent on the accuracy of the best accepted analytical methods.

Effluent  quality can also be expressed in terms of effluent waste loads
which are independent of waste water flow.  The effluent waste loads re-
sulting from the application of  treatment  technologies  equivalent  to
multimedia filtration and activated carbon adsorption form the basis for
the  best  available  treatment  economically  available  for  the latex
subcategory.  The proposed limitations  are:
                COD
                BOD
                Suspended  Solids
                Oil  and  Grease
                pH
                                     1.78 kg/kkg(lb/1000  Ib)
                                     0.07 kg/kkg(lb/1000  Ib)
                                     0.1 a kg/kkg(lb/1000  Ib)
                                     0.07 kg/kkg(lb/1000  Ib)
                                     6.0 to 9.0
of product
of product
of product
of product
                                  175

-------

-------
                               SECTION XI

                    NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
Tire and Inner Tube Industry

Recommended effluent limitations for new sources are identical and  com-
mensurate  with  best practicable technology currently available.  These
effluent limitations are presented in Section IX of this report.

Synthetic Rubber Industry

Because all stated subcategories of the synthetic  rubber  industry  are
highly  technical  and  involve  proprietary processes, in-plant control
technologies cannot  be  fully  defined  or  enumerated;  such  in-plant
measures might impact on manufacturing practices and product quality.

Since advanced waste water treatment technologies have been proposed for
the best available treatment economically achievable  (BATEA) by existing
plants  by  1983,  the  recommended effluent limitations for new sources
prior to 1983 are identical to  those  recommeded  as  best  practicable
control  technology currently available for each of the synthetic rubber
subcat egor.i es.

Pretreatment Recommendations

A minimum  level  of  pretreatment  must  be  given  to  new  production
facilities  which  will  discharge  waste  water  to  a  publicly  owned
treatment works.  In addition, potential pollutants which  will  inhibit
or  upset  the  performance  of  publicly  owned treatment works must be
eliminated from such discharges.

Tire and Inner Tube Industry

Pretreatment recommendations for process waste waters from the tire  and
inner  tube industry include the separation of oils and solids in an API
gravity separator and the use of an equalization basin to prevent  shock
loads  of oil, suspended solids or batch dumps of dipping solutions from
entering and upsetting the performance of a publically  owned  treatment
works.   Oily  wastes,  after  dilution  in  a public sewer system, will
remain untreated and therefore must be controlled before discharge  from
the plant boundaries.

Pretreatment  of  other  nonprocess waste waters from the tire and inner
tube  industry  will  pose  more  difficult  problems.   These   include
alkalinity  in boiler blowdowns and both acidity and alkalinity in water
treatment wastes.  Both boiler blowdowns and water treatment wastes will
contain high concentrations of suspended and dissolved solids.   Cooling
tower  water  treatment wastes may contain heavy metals such as chromium
and zinc used for corrosion  inhibition.   Potential  problems  such  as
acidity,  alkalinity, solids, oils, and heavy metals may require control
at the plant to conform to local ordinances for discharge to a  publicly
                                 177

-------
 owned treatment works.   The control techniques and treatment methods  are
 described in earlier sections of this report.   Equalization of the waste
 load  and waste water flow is the key step in  the control  of batch dumps
 of production chemicals and solutions.

 Synthetic Rubber Industry

 Emulsion crumb and solution crumb slurry overflow waste waters should be
 passed through crumb pits to remove floatable  rubber   crumb.    Few pub-
 licly owned  treatment  works have primary clarification  equipment ade-
 quate to handle large quantities of agglomerated  rubber crumb solids.

 Wastewaters  from emulsion crumb  and latex production  facilities are   in-
 variably  laden  with  uncoagulated  latex solids.  Since  publicly owned
 treatment works do not  generally have coagulation capabilities,  these
 waste waters   should,  at least,  be chemically coagulated  with a sinking
 agent and clarified.

 Utility   wastes  often   exhibit   extreme   pH   peaks  which   should   be
 neutralized  or,   at least equalized, prior to discharge to the publicly
 owned treatment works.   This  problem is   not   so   severe   with emulsion
 crumb and latex  plants,  where  pH adjustment  is  required prior to
 chemical  coagulation, as  it is with solution crumb production  facilities
 where adjustment of the waste water pH is  normally not necessary.  Heavy
 metals, present in  cooling tower  blowdowns   for  example,   should  be
 eliminated by  substitution of inhibitor or equalized prior to  discharge
 to a  publicly owned treatment works.

 No compounds or species present in  synthetic rubber process waste  water
 can   be  considered toxic  or inhibitory to the performance of publicly
 owned treatment works.

 In summary, the  following pretreatment requirements apply to waste water
 discharges to publicly  owned  treatment  works  from  synthetic  rubber
plants:

    Emulsion — Crumb  Subcateqory  - Gravity separation of crumb fines in
    crumb pits, chemical coagulation and  clarification  of  latex- laden
    waste waters, and neutralization or equalization of utility wastes.

    Solution — crumb  Subcateororv  - Gravity separation of crumb fines in
    crumb pits, and neutralization or equalization of utility wastes.
         — Subcatecrory  -  Chemical  coagulation  of  latex-laden  waste
    waters, and neutralization or equalization of utility wastes.
                                178

-------
                              SECTION XII

                            ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The original draft of this document was prepared by Roy F. Weston, Inc.,
West  Chester,  Pennsylvania,  under  the  direction  of  Mr.  Melvin J.
Sotnick, Manager Chemical Engineering  Services.   He  was  assisted  by
David  C.  Day, PhD, Principal Engineer, Mr. Robert A.  Morris, Chemical
Engineer and other members of the staff.

The  Environmental  Protection  Agency   wishes   to   acknowledge   the
cooperation  of  the officers and plant personnel in the rubber industry
who provided valuable assistance in the collection of data  relating  to
process  raw waste load and treatment plant performance at various tire,
inner tube and synthetic rubber facilities.  Special acknowledgement  is
made of Mr. Daniel G. Pennington of the Rubber Manufacturers Association
for coorindating the schedule of visits among the industry members.

Acknowledgement  is  made  of  the  assistance provided in supplying the
manifold copies of RAPP applications by the EPA Regional  Administrators
as   well   as   the   physical  assistance  of  the  Regional  Industry
Coordinator's staff personnel during the   field  sampling  and  analysis
portions  of the project.  In addition acknowlegement is made to Messrs.
John qdnvery, Jesse Cohen and Richard Dobbs and Robert Smith of the  EPA
National  Environmental Research center, Cincinnati Ohio for the special
studies on the activated carbon treatment  of synthetic rubber production
waste waters.

Special mention and acknowledgement is made of the following EPA  rubber
industry  working  group members who assisted in field sampling, project
evaluation and review of the  draft  and   final  documents:   George  R.
Webster,   Chairman  and  C.  R.  McSwiney,  Legal  Assistant,  Effluent
Guidelines Division; Herbert  S.Skovronek, PhD,  Edison  Water  Quality
Research   Laboratory   Division  of  NERC,  Cincinnati;  Paul  Ambrose,
Enforcement Division, EPA Region III; John Lank,  Enforcement  Division,
EPA  Region IV; Charles H. Ris and Marshall Dick, Office of Research and
Development,  Headquarters; Richard Insiriger,  Planning  and  Evaluation,
Economic  Analysis  Branch,  Headquarters; Doris Ruopp, Office of Toxic
Materials, Headquarters; Alan W. Eckert, Office of General Counsel;  and
John   E.  Riley,  Project  Officer, Rubber Industry,  Effluent Guidelines
Division.  Acknowledgement is made of the  efforts of  Jane  D.  Mitchell,
Effluent   Guidelines   Division   for   typing  the  final  manuscript.
Acknowledgement is  made of the overall  guidance and   direction  provided
by Mr.  Allen  Cywin,  Director, Effluent  Guidelines Division and Mr. Ernst
P.   Hall,  Deputy  Director and others within the Agency who provided many
helpful suggestions and comments.
                                    179

-------

-------
                              SECTION XIII

                               REFERENCES


1.  Shreve, R.N., Chemical Process Industries. CPI; McGraw  Hill,  Inc.,
    New York, (1967) .

2.  Standen, A., ed., Kirk-Othmer. Encyclopedia of Cbemical__2echnglggY.;
    Vol. 17, John Wiley and Sons, New York, (1968).

3.  Kestein, B., "SBR and  Polybutadiene  Rubbers,"  Symposium  on  Tire
    Material   Decisions,  AICHE  74th  National  Meeting,  Minneapolis,
    Minnesota,  (August 29, 1972).

4.  "Rubber Industry Facts", Rubber Manufacturers Association, New York,
    1972.

5.  Private communications from Chem Systems, Inc., New York.

6.  "Air Flotation-Biological Oxidation of Synthetic  Rubber  and  Latex
    Wastewater",  Firestone  Synthetic. Rubber  and  Latex Company, Lake
    Charles, Louisiana (October  15, 1972).

7.  "Industrial  Wastewater  Reclamation   with   400,000-gallon-per-day
    Vertical   Tube   Evaporator,   Design,   construction  and  Initial
    Operation",  The  General  Tire  and  Rubber  company,  Akron,  Ohio
    (September,  1972).

8.   Unpublished  internal  EPA  report   to  George R. Webster, Effluent
Guidelines Division, from J. M Cohen, Chief, Physical Chemical Treatment
Research NERC Cincinnati entitled  "Feasibility  of  Treating  Synthetic
Rubber Waste Water by Granular Activated  Carbon, August 24, 1973.

                          GENERAL BIBLIOGRAPHY


Rostenbach, R.E., "Status Report on Synthetic Rubber Wastes."  Sewage
and Industrial  Waste, Vol. 24; No. 9,  (September 1952), 1138-1143.

Placek, O.R. and Ruchhoft, C.C.,  "A Study of wastes from  the Synthetic
Rubber  Industry." Sewage and Industrial Waste, Vol. 18, No, 6,
 (November  1946),  1160-1181.

Martin, A.E. and Rostenbach, R.E., "Industrial Waste Treatment and
Disposal."   Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol. 45, No. 12,
 (December  1953),  2680-2685.

"Putting the closed  Loop  into Practice."   Environmental Science  and
Technology,  Vol.  6,  No.  13,  (December  1972),  1072-1073.
                              rJ                '
Dougan, L.D. and Bell, J.C., "Waste Disposal  at a  Synthetic Rubber Plant."
sewage  and Industrial Wastes, Vol. 23, No.  2,  (February 1951),  181-187.
                                 181

-------
 "A Study of Pollution Control Practices  in Manufacturing Industries."
 Marketing Services Division, Research  Services  Department,  Dun and
 Bradstreet, Inc.,  (June  1971).

 Hebbard, G.M., Powell, s.T. and Rostenbach, R.E.,  "Rubber industry."
 Industrial and Engineering chemistry-  Vol. 39,  No.  5,  (May  1947) ,
Nemerow, N.L., Theories and Practices of
Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York,
                                                     waste Treatment.
 Alliger, G. and Weissert, F.C., "Elastomers."  Industrial and Engineering
 .Chemistry, Vol. 59, No. 8,  (August 1967), 80-90.            -- ----

 Herzlich, H.J. , "Tire Compounding."  Chemical_Engineer ing Progress,
 Vol. 69, No. 2, (February 1973), 77-7JFI          ---- --- --

 Montgomery, D.R. ,  "Integrated System for Plant Wastes Combats stream
     Sn  *"  qhemical Engineering. Vol. 63, No. H,  (February 1967),
 Ruebensaal,  C.F., "The Rubber Industry Statistical Report and changing
 Markets and  Manufacturing Patterns in the Synthetic Rubber Industry."
      1^3"01131 Insti"fcu"te of Syndetic Rubber Producers, Inc., New York,
Anderson,  E.V. ,  "Rubber,  A $16 Billion Industry Turns on Tires."
Chemical and Engineering  Newsr (July 14, 1969), 39-83.

Hofmann, W. , Vulcanization and Vulcanizing Agerrt-.a. Palmerton Publishing
Co.,  Inc.,  New York,  (1967).

Hawley,  G.G., The Condensed chemical Dictionary;  Reinhold Co., New York,


Fawcett, R.j.^and McDone,  E.T.,  "Special Rubbers  in Tires."  Symposium
on Tire  Material  Decisions, AICHE 73rd National Meeting, Minneapolis,
Minnesota,  (August 29,  1972).                                   t~ *.**>,

Lund, H.F.,  ed..  Industrial Pollution Control HandhnnV;  McGraw-Hill,  Inc.,
N€SW iOZTJCf  (19/1) •

"Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes. "  Environmental Pro-
tection  Agency, National Environmental Research Center,  Analytical Quality
Control  Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio,  (1971).                         «J.«y

Taras, M.J., ed. ,  Standard Methods for the  Examination of Watpr and
??o5f?   r*  American Public Health  Association, WaiKIEgton",  D.C., '
(1971) .

Water; Atmospheric Analysis. Part  23,  "Standard Method of Test for Bio-
chemical Oxygen Demand of Industrial Water  and  industrial wastewater."
1970 Annual Book of ASTM stanjar-jg,.  American Society of  Testing and
                                 182

-------
Materials, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,  (1970).

Eckenfelder, W.W., Indus-trial Water  Pollution  Control;  McGraw-Hill,  Inc.,
New York,  (1966).

Perry, J.H., ed., Chemical Engineers' Handbook,  4th Ed.;  McGraw-Hill, Inc.,
New York,  (1963).
                                  183

-------

-------
                              SECTION XIV

                                GLOSSARY
Act

The Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.

Activator

A  metallic  oxide  that  makes  possible  the crosslinking of sulfur in
rubber vulcanization.

Antioxidant

An  organic  compound  added  to   rubber   to   retard   oxidation   or
deterioration.

Accelerator Agents

A  compound which greatly reduces the time required for vulcanization of
synthetic or natural rubber.

Banburv Mixer

Trade  name  for  a  common  internal  mixer  manufactured   by   Farrel
Corporation used in the compounding and mixing of tire rubber stock.

Best Available Technology Economically Achievable  (BATEA)

Treatment  required by July 1,  1983 for industrial discharges to  surface
waters as defined by section 301  (b)  (2)  (A) of the Act.

Best Practicable Control Technology Currently Available  (BPCTCA)

Treatment required by July 1r 1977 for industrial discharges to   surface
waters as defined by section 301  (b)  (1)  (A) of the Act.

Best Available Demonstrated Control Technology  (BADCT)

Treatment required for new so^rrces as defined by Section  306 of the Act.
Biochemical Oxygen Demand  (5 day).

Baa House

An  air  emission  control device used to collect intermediate  and  large
particles  (greater than 29 microns) in  a  bag   filter.   A  bag  filter
constructed  of fabric.  Common  usage in the tire industry is to  control
                                 185

-------
 and recover carbon  black  in  a  dry  state  from  vapors  leaving  the
 compounding area.


 Butyl Rubber


 A  synthetic  rubber  made by the solution polymerization of isobutylene
 and isoprene.                                                       •*


 Camelback                                                ,


 Tire tread used in the retreading of tire carcasses.

 Capital Costs


 Financial charges in August 1971  dollars which are computed as  the  cost
 of  capital times the capital expenditures for pollution control.  Cost
 of capital is  assumed to be 10 percent.

 Carbon Black


 A reinforcing  agent used in large quantities in tire  rubber compounds.

 Catalyst


 A substance that  initiates  a chemical reaction and, enables  it to proceed
 at a greatly accelerated rate.


 Category and Subcategory


 Divisions of a particular industry which possess different  traits  which
 affect water quality and treatability.

 Cement


 A  process   stream  consisting  of polymeric  rubber  solids  dissolved in
 solvent.


 Cement (Tire and Tube)


An  adhesive used in  tire  and inner tube  manufacturing.

 Coagulation


The combination or aggregation of  previously emulsified particles  into a
 clot or mass.
Chemical Oxygen Demand.


Crumb


Small coagulated particles of synthetic rubber.
                                186

-------
Curing Agent:                           :

Curing or vulcanization agents are  substances  which  bring  about  the
rubber  crosslinking  process.  The most important agent is sulfur.  See
vulcanization.

Depreciation

Accounting charges reflecting the deterioration of a capital asset  over
its  useful  life.   Reported as straight line over five years with zero
salvage value.

Dry Air Pollution control

The technique of air pollution abatement without the use of water.

Emulsion                            :

A stable mixture of two or more immersible liquids held in suspension by
small percentage of substances called emulsifiers.
                                                         reduction   and
Endogenous Respiration

Auto-oxidation  of  the  microorganisms  producing   a
stabilization of biological solids.              '

EPDM

A  synthetic  rubber based on ethylene-propylene and a controlled amount
of non-conjugated diene.  Polymerization is carried out in solution.

Extender                               ;

A low specific gravity substance used in rubber formulations chiefly  to
reduce costs.

Extrude

To  shape by forcing a material through a die.  The operation is carried
out in  a  device  known  as  an  extruder.   In  tire  and  inner  tube
manufacture treads and inner tubes are formed by extrusion.

Filler


A  high specific gravity  (2.00-4.50) compound used in rubber mixtures to
provide a certain degree of stiffness and hardness and used to  decrease
costs.   Fillers have neither reinforcing or coloring properties and are
similar to extenders in their cost-reducing function.

3ES

Gallons per minute.                                      '
                                 187

-------
IB

Polyisoprene  rubber,  the  major component of  natural   rubber,
thetlcally by the  solution  polymerization of isoprene.

Inv e atment Cos18
                                                              amde  syn-
The  capital   expenditures  reported  in August  1971  dollars required to
bring the treatment  or  control technology  into operation.   Included  are
expenditures   for  design, site  preparation, purchase of materials, con-
struction and  installation.  Not included  is the purchase  of   land  on
which the system is  to  be built.
Liter
A compounded rubber stock applicable to a wide variety  of  uses.
ingredients are rubber, carbon black and extender oil.
A  suspension  of  rubber particles in a water solution.  Coagulation of
£he rubber is prevented by protective colloids.  A colloid is a  surface
active  substance  that  prevents a dispersed phase of a suspension from
coalescing by forming a thin layer on the surface of each particle.
                                                                    Main
Milligrams  per  liter.   Nearly equivalent to parts per million concen-
tration.

Modifier

An additive which adjusts the chain length  and  molecular  weight  dis-
tribution of the rubber during polymerization.

Monomer

A  compound  of  a  relatively  low molecular weight which is capable of
conversion to polymers or othe/ compounds.

NBR

Nitrile rubber, a synthetic rubber made by  emulsion  polymerization  of
acrylonitrile with butadiene.

New Source
                                 188

-------
Any  building,  structure, facility, or installation from which there is
or may be a discharge of pollutants and whose construction is  commenced
after the publication of the proposed regulations.

Non-Productive Rubber Stock

Rubber  stock  which  has  been  compounded but which contains no curing
agents.  Synonym for non-reactive rubber stock.

Non-Reactive Rubber Stock

Rubber stock which has been compounded  but  which  contains  no  curing
agents.  Synonym for non-productive rubber stock.

Operations and Maintenance

Costs  required  to  operate and maintain pollution abatement equipment.
They include labor, material, insurance, taxes,  solid  waste  disposal,
etc.

PER

Polybutadiene rubber, a synthetic rubber made by solution polymerization
of butadiene.           ,                                          ,

ES

A  measure  of the relative acidity or alkalinity of water.  A pH of 7.0
indicates a neutral condition.  A greater pH indicates alkalinity and  a
lower pH indicates acidity.  A one unit change in pH indicates a 10 fold
change in acidity and alkalinity.

Pigment

Any  substance that imparts color to the rubber.  Pigment substances such
as zinc oxide or carbon black also act as reinforcing agents.

Plastic

Capable  of  being  shaped  or molded with or without the application of
heat.

Process Water

All  waters that come into direct contact with the raw materials,  inter-
mediate products.

Productive Rubber Stock

Compounded   rubber which  contains curing agents  and which can be vulcan-
ized.   Synonym for reactive rubber  stock.

Reactive Rubber Stock
                                   189

-------
 Compounded rubber which contains curing agents and which can be  vulcan-
 ized.  Synonym for productive rubber stock.

 Reinforcers or Reinforcing Agent
 voo4.         Utf.A  t0  *ncrease  the  strength,  hardness and abrasion
 resistance of rubber.  Reinforcing agents used in the rubber  processing
 include carbon bale, zinc oxide and hydrated silicas.
 Styrene  Butadiene Rubber,  a synthetic rubber made either by emulsion or
 solution polymerization of  styrene and butadiene.

 Soapstone

 A substance used to prevent tire  and  inner  tube  rubber  stocks  from
 sticking  together  during   periods  of storage.   Used in both a  dry and
 solution form.   The major ingredient is usually clay.

 Solution

 A uniformly dispersed mixture of the molecular  level   of  one or  more
 substances in one or more other  substances.

 Stripper


 A device  in which  relatively  volatile components  are removed  from a
 mixture  by distillation or  by passage of  steam through the mixture.

 Surface  Waters

 Navigable waters.    The  waters   of   the  United   states   including  the
 territorial seas.                                                  y

 Tire Bead

 Tire  beads are  coated  wires  inserted in  the pneumatic  tire at the point
 where the tire meets the steel rim on which it is  mounted.  They  insure
 an air tight seal between the tire and rim.

 Tire Cord

 Woven  synthetic  or natural fabrics  impregnated with rubber.  They form
 the body  of the tire and  supply it with most of its strength.

 Tire Tread

Tire tread is riding surface of the tire.  Their design and  composition
 are dependent on the end use of the tire.

Tread Book
                                190

-------
A  set of movable shelves designed for the temporary storage of extruded
tread sections between the extrusion and tire building operations.  Each
shelf pivots like the page of a book, thus the name tread book.

Vulcanization

Vulcanization is the process by which plastic rubber is  converted  into
the  elastic  rubber or hard rubber state.  The process is brought about
by linking of macro-molecules at their reactive sites.
get Aj.r Pollution Control

The  technique  of  air  pollution  abatement  utilizing  water  as
absorptive media.                                            .
an
                                 191

-------

-------
            o
         o
                         I
                     3   1
   "5T

   «*•
O
    H
            H
                 in
                 o
                   CM  in
                   in  m
                 m CM  m
                                       *
                                       ^**
                                       CM
          Cfl
                o o o  o
                  CO
                                             ,_
                             oo   oo     m-^inroin
                             CSrHOOO^OCJOOOOCMOO

                                   CM rH
                                 •P -P
-S
                                                  a1-
                     *

                     In



                     -S1
                   1 O^ CO
                   o d,
                   >vo
                   i  . in
                   H o
                     oo

                     o
                       •
                     o
        O\       "*
        CM CN r-   "*
        
-------

-------
-------
o

o
o

o
CM


O
O

O
             O

             O
                    •-     CM
                    O     CO








V)
+->
c
ra
Z
-Q
E
3
L.
O
C
o

3
"o
CO

O
n-

CT

^
cr
-*
CM
CO
CO





a

•v.
cr

8
CO



4-1
C
T

o
o
CO

[S,».
»—

•^
r-
rvS




S
CO






CM
CO

0
o
LA

CO
CM

VO
CM
CM




CO
CM
ro
!~





LA
VO
f—

O
O


-d-


i^
*-
0




^
0






co"
o
-d-

0
o


ro


CO

,_




VO
CO






cn
CM
r-

O
O
cn

^_
^~
•
LA

,_ ,



'
O
CO '






cn
CM
*—

o
o
CTV

f_
i—

^,
*-
^




CO
CO
LA






CO
CO

0
o
0
•t
cn
CM
                                                                             •§
                                                                             •o
                                                                             c
                                                                             ID
                                                                             O-
                                                                             tn
                                                                             3
                                                                             I
                                                                             M-
                                                                             o


                                                                             ra
                                                                             £





u
3
T3
e
0.








•o
(U
•a
c

4J
X
LU

—
O

OC
CO
CO


^
u
ra

m

|

u
ra
o

a:
CO
CO










T3
C
a)
•M
x
LU


•a

C TJ
ra c
a)


O LU
                                                                       (0     (D    •—
                                                                       3     4->    —
                                                                             Q)    •—

                                                                       >-    TJ     O
                                                                      4-i            ra
                                                                             T3    14-
                                                                                             ra
                                                                                            4->
                                                                                            ra
                                                                             ro
                                                                             cc
                      167