United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Effluent Guidelines Division
WH-552
Washington DC 20460
EPA 440/1-817082-9
April 1981
Water and Waste Management
Guidance Document
for the Control
of Water Pollution
in the:

Photographic  Processing
Industry
                      ""
                          .
                    Fax: 202-36^*06-
                   jett.george@epa.gov
          George M. Jett
          Chemical Engineer
        U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
       Engineering and Analysis Division (4303)
         1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
         Washington, D.C. 20460

-------

-------
                GUIDANCE DOCUMENT

                     for the

          CONTROL OF WATER POLLUTION IN

       THE PHOTOGRAPHIC PROCESSING INDUSTRY
              Walter C. Barber, Jr.
               Acting Administrator
                 Steven Schatzow
          Deputy Assistant  Administrator
       for Water Regulations and Standards

               Jeffery D. Denit
  Acting Director, Effluent'Guidelines Division

            G. Edward Stigall, Chief
Inorganic Chemicals and  Service Industries Branch
                  Richard Kinch
                John E.  Newbrough
                Project Officers
                   April 1981
          Effluent Guidelines Division
      Office of Water and Waste Management
      U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
            Washington,  D.C.  20460

-------

-------
                          CONTENTS


Section
                                                      Page
   I     CONCLUSIONS ...............      I_1
  II     SUMMARY
 III     CHARACTERISTICS OF THE INDUSTRY AND
          PROCESSES  ...............    In_1
           Industry Description  ....!!!!'!    III-i
           Process Descriptions  ......  [  *      III-4
             Black and White Photographic
              Processing .............    III-4
             Color Photographic Processing .  .  .  .    Hi-8
           Processing Chemistry  .........    111-12
           Processing Equipment  ......  .  .  .    111-34
           In-Process Control Technologies .  .  .  !    111-37
             Effect of In-Process Controls on
              Product Quality  ..........    111-37
             Silver Recovery ........  *        111-39
             Coupler Recovery  .......  ,  .  .    111-46
             Bleach Regeneration ......  '.'.'.    1 1 1-46
             Developer Regeneration   .......    111-52
             Water Conservation  ........  .'    111-53
           End-of-Pipe Treatment Technologies*  !  '.    111-56
           Industry Characteristics   .......    111-62

  IV     INDUSTRY  CATEGORIZATION ...  ......     IV-i
           Introduction  ...........  \  [     IV_-]
           Categorization Basis  .....  .  .  ]  .     iv-1
           Selection of Production Related
           Parameter  ..............     IV-1 2

  V     PROCESS WASTE  CHARACTERIZATION   .....     V-l
           Data Base .............         v-1
           Processes Used   .....*!!!!*"'     y-9
           Water Use .........  .  .             V-l 7
           Process  Waste .......  !!!!!*     v-19
           Effluent  Characteristics   ...!!!]     v-25

 VI     SELECTION OF POLLUTANT  PARAMETERS  ....    VI-1
          Description  of Pollutant Parameters of'
           Significance .............    VI-5
                           111

-------
 VII     CONTROL AND TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES  .  .  .    VII-1
           In-Process Control Technologies ....    VII-1
           End-of-Pipe Treatment Technologies  .  .    VII-23
           Variability Factor  	    VII-27

VIII     COST, ENERGY, WASTE REDUCTION BENEFITS
          AND NON-WATER ASPECTS OF TREATMENT AND
          CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES 	   VIII-1
           Introduction  	   VIII-1
           General Cost References and
            Rationale  	   VIII-1
           Control and Treatment Costs for
            Representative Photoprocessing
            Plants 	   VIII-4
           Non-Water Quality Aspects  	   VIII-33

  IX     ACKNOWLEDGMENTS	      IX-1

   X     BIBLIOGRAPHY  	      X-l

  XI     GLOSSARY	     XI-1

APPENDIX A -  Telephone Contact Survey Memo  ....     A-l

APPENDIX B -  Long-Term Plant Effluent Data  ....     B-l
                              IV

-------
                          FIGURES


Number

 III-l   Process: black and white negative - film
          and paper  	   111-15

 III-2   Process: black and white reversal ....   111-16

 III-3   Process: color negative film, Kodak
          C-22	   111-17

 III-4   Process: color negative film, C-41  .  .   .   III-l8

 III-5   Process: color negative film, Kodak
          MC-42	   III-l9

 III-6   Process: color negative film, ECP-1,
          ECN-1, ECP-2 	   111-20

 III-7   Process: color negative film, ECN-2 .  .   .   111-21

 III-8   Process: color reversal film (1C), E-3   .   111-22

 III-9   Process: color reversal film (1C), EM-25,
          E-4, ME-4, ECO-3, CRI-1  	   111-23

 111-10  Process: color reversal film (1C),
          E-7M	   111-24

 III-l1  Process: color reversal film (1C),
          E-6	   111-25

 111-12  Process: color reversal film (DC),
          K-12	   111-26

 III-l3  Process: color reversal film, (DC),
          K-14	   111-27

 111-14  Process: color negative paper, EP-2 .  .   .   111-28

 111-15  Process: color negative paper, EP-3,
          85/86	   111-29

-------
 111-16   Process:  color  negative  paper,  MC-m  .  .    111-30

 111-17   Process:  color  reversal  paper,  EPR-5,
          EPR-100   	    111-31

 111-18   Process:  color  reversal  paper,  P-10  .  .  .    111-32

 111-19   Process:  color  reversal  paper,  P-18  .  .  .    111-33

  IV-1    Process water use vs. production   ....     iv-5

  IV-2    Amount of  silver in effluent vs.
          production	     IV-6

  IV-3    Age of plant vs. process water  use   .  .  .     IV-7

  IV-4    Age of plant vs. amount  of silver  in
          effluent	     IV-8

  IV-5    Number of  employees vs.  process water
          use	     IV-9

  IV-6    Number of  employees vs.  amount of silver
          in effluent	     IV-10

VII-1     Total cyanide content in effluent - no
          bleach regeneration  	   VII-6

VII-2    Total cyanide content in effluent - plant
          using bleach regeneration  	   VII-7

VII-3    Total cyanide content in effluent - bleach
          regeneration and ferrous sulfate
          precipitation  	   VII-8

VII-4    Silver content  in effluent - no silver
          recovery on some fix solutions 	   VII-13

VII-5   Silver content  in effluent - silver
          recovery on all waste fix	   VII-14

VII-6   Silver content  in effluent - waste fix not
          in sample  	   VII-15
                            VI

-------
 VII-7   Effluent silver concentration vs. effluent
          silver amount  	  .  .   VII-19

 VII-8   Cyanide concentration vs. percent
          production using ferricyanide bleach  .  .   VII-20

 VII-9   Process water elimination schematic  .  .  .   VII-28

 VII-10  Long-Term Silver Concentration in
          Effluent at Plant 6208  	   VII-31

VIII-1   Silver recovery capital  investment costs
          vs. production 	  VIII-10

VII1-2   Silver recovery operating costs vs.
          production 	  VIII-12

VIII-3   Reverse osmosis equipment capital invest-
          ment cost vs. flow, includes reverse
          osmosis, conductivity control and
          prefilter  	  VIII-16

VIII-4   Fe EDTA bleach regeneration invested
          capital costs vs. production 	  VIII-18

VIII-5   Fe EDTA bleach regeneration operating
          costs vs. production 	  VIII-19
                            vn

-------
                           TABLES
Number                                                Page

 III-l   Photographic Processing Establishment
          Categories	   III-2

 III-2   Number of Plants and Production Breakdown
          by Size Category	   111-3

 III-3   Common Color Materials  	   III-9

 III-4   Summary of Kodak "200" Plant Survey . .  .   111-64

 III-5   Correlation of Type of Service with
          Production and Water Use from Telephone
          Survey Information 	   II1-66

 III-6   Correlation of Production with Water Use
          from Telephone Survey Information  . .  .   II1-67

 III-7   Correlation of Process Type with Production
          from Telephone Survey Information  .  .  .   II1-68

 II1-8   Correlation of Processing Methods with
          Production from Telephone Survey
          Information   	   111-69

 III-9   Correlation of Replenishment Use with
          Production from Telephone Survey
          Information   	   111-70

 III-l0  Correlation of Squeegee Use with Production
          from Telephone Survey Information   .  .  .   II1-71

 III-ll  Correlation of Silver Recovery  Use  with
          Production from Telephone Survey
          Information   	    II1-72

 III-l2  Correlation of Silver Recovery  Methods with
          Production from Telephone Survey
           Information   	    111-73
                             Vlll

-------
111-13  Correlation of Bleach Regeneration Use with
         Production from Telephone Survey
         Information	- m-74

111-14  Correlation of Treatment Use with
         Production from Telephone Survey
         Information  	    II1-75

111-15  Correlation of Discharge Method with
         Production from Telephone Survey
         Information  	    II1-76

 IV-1    Distinguishing Process Characteristics of
         Various Material Types 	     IV-3

  V-l    Production Summary  	      V-3

  V-2    Photographic Processes Used at Plants
         Studied	      V-10

  V-3    Recovery and Regeneration at Plants
         Studied	      V-l 4

  V-4    Estimated Water Use for Plants in the
         Photoprocessing Industry 	      V-20

  V-5    Processing Machine Tank Overflow
         Composition Without Application of
         In-Process Controls - Pollutant
         Concentration  	      V-26

  V-6    Processing Machine Tank Overflow Without
         Application of In-Process Controls -
         Pollutant Amount 	      V-27

  V-7    Before and After Results of Various Silver
         Recovery Operations  	      V-29

  V-8    Effluent Characteristics with Application
         of Controls - Concentration  	      V-30

  V-9    Effluent Characteristics with Application
         of Controls - Pollutant Amounts  ....      V-34
                            IX

-------
  V-10  Treatment Technologies Used by Photo-
         processors Surveyed	      V-39

  V-ll  Sampling of In-Process Controls and End-of-
         Pipe Treatments	      V-40

  V-12  Effluent Characteristics After Application
         of End-of-Pipe Treatments - Pollutant
         Concentrations 	      V-41

  V-13  Effluent Characteristics After Application
         of End-of-Pipe Treatments - Pollutant
         Amounts	      V-42

 VI-1   Toxic Pollutants  	     VI-2

 VI-2   Conventional Pollutants 	     VI-3

 VI-3   Non-Conventional Pollutants 	     VI-4

 VI-4   Pollutants Found in Significant Quantities
         in Effluents from Photographic Processing
         Plants	     VI-5

VII-1   Estimated Breakdown of In-Process Control
         and Treatment Use by Plant Size (Daily
         Production)	    VII-2

VII-2   Total Cyanide Content in Plant Effluent of
         Plants Using Ferricyanide Bleach with no
         Regeneration 	    VI1-4

VII-3   Total Cyanide Content in Effluent of Plants
         Using Ferricyanide Bleach
         Regeneration	    VI1-5

VII-4   Total Cyanide Content in Effluent of Plants
         Using Ferricyanide Bleach Regeneration
         plus FeSO£ Precipitation Treatment on
         Waste Fix	    VII-5

VII-5   Results of Silver Recovery on Silver
         Content in Plant Effluent - No Silver
         Recovery on Some Processes 	    VII-10

-------
 VII-6   Results of Silver Recovery on Silver
          Content in Plant Effluent - Silver
          Recovery on All Processes  	   VII-11

 VII-7   Results of Silver Recovery on Silver
          Content in Plant Effluent - Silver
          Recovery on All Waste Fix But Waste Fix
          Not in Sample	   VII-12

 VII-8   Results of Silver Recovery on Silver
          Content in Plant Effluent - Conventional
          Silver Recovery on All Waste Fix plus
          Additional Recovery	   VII-16

 VII-9   Effectiveness of Various Silver Recovery
          Procedures 	   VII-17

 VII-10  Summary of Prewash Results  	   VII-21

 VII-11  Effect of Countercurrent Washing and
          Wash Water Recycle on Effluent
          Hydraulic Loads  	   VII-23

 VII-12  Pollutant Variability Factors 	   VII-30

VIII-1   Production Categories 	  VIII-5

VII1-2   Costs for Silver Recovery of Silver from
          Fix Solutions Using Conventional
          Methods  	 	  VIII-7

VII1-3   Costs for Recovery of Silver from
          After-Fix Wash Waters by Ion
          Exchange 	  VIII-8

VIII-4   Costs for Recovery of Silver from
          After-Fix Wash Waters by Reverse Osmosis
          and Precipitation  	  VIII-9

VIII-5   Costs for Ferric EDTA Bleach Regeneration
          By Aeration and Chemical Addition  . . .  VIII-20

VIII-6   Costs for Ferricyanide Bleach Regeneration
          By Ozonation 	  VIII-23
                             XI

-------
VIII-7   Costs for Ferrous Sulfate Precipitation of
          Ferricyanide from Waste Fix  	  VIII-25

VI11-8   Costs for Reduction of Process Wastewater
          to a Mimimum By Conventional and Advanced
          Controls Plus Multi-Stage Evapora-
          tion 	  VIII-27

VII1-9   Control and Treatment Costs for Hexavalent
          Chromium Reduction - Batch Treatment .  .  VIII-29

VIII-10  Control and Treatment Costs for Hexavalent
          Chromium Reduction - Continuous
          Treatment  	  VII1-30

VIII-11  Control and Treatment Costs for pH
          Adjustment (Chromium Treatment)  ....  VIII-31

VI11-12  Control and Treatment Costs for
          Diatomaceous Earth Filtration (Chromium
          Treatment) 	  VIII-32
                             XII

-------
                         SECTION I
                        CONCLUSIONS
This guidance document is the  result  of  a  study  of  the
photographic  processing industry by the Effluent Guidelines
Division  of  the  Environmental  Protection  Agency.    The
purpose  of  the document is to assist local authorities and
other  interested  parties  in  the  control  of  wastewater
pollutants  from  photographic  processing  facilities where
required.  The toxic pollutants  of  concern  which  may  be
present  in  the  raw  wastewater  are  silver, cyanide, and
chromium.  Silver  is  present  in  the  raw  waste  in  all
facilities  and  cyanide is present in the raw wastewater in
many color processing facilities.  Chromium  is  present  in
only  those facilities which use dichromate bleach.  The use
of this bleach is generally restricted to some processors of
commercial movie film.

Conventional  silver  recovery   (consisting   of   metallic
replacement or electrolytic or both) and ferricyanide bleach
regeneration  are widely practiced as in-process controls by
most of the industry because of economic benefits.  Recovery
of silver from wash water  using  ion  exchange  or  reverse
osmosis  are advanced controls not widely used, although the
use of ion exchange  is  increasing.   The  use  of  various
in-process  controls  and  treatments  by  the  industry  is
estimated in Table 1-1.
                             1-1

-------
                          TABLE 1-1
 ESTIMATED BREAKDOWN  OF  IN-PROCESS CONTROL AND TREATMENT USE
               BY  PLANT  SIZE  (DAILY PRODUCTION)

          PERCENTAGE  OF  PLANTS  USING INDICATED CONTROLS  BY  SIZE
                             CATEGORY

Pro-
duction
sq m/
day

Conven-
tional
Silver
Recovery


Ion
Exchange


Reverse
Osmos i s
Ferri-
cyanide
Bleach
Regen-
eration

Ferrous
Sulfate
Precipi-
tation

Di-
chromate
Treat-
ment
<93            *
93-186       95
186-464      100
464-4,640    100
over 4,640   100
 0
 2
 8
 2
20
 0
 0
 0
 0
33
 *
50
60
90
95
 0
 0
 0.3
 3
20
*   Insufficient information to make reasonable estimate.


These controls reduce the waste loads of silver and  cyanide
by up to 85 percent.  It was also established that more than
99  percent  of  the  photographic processing facilities are
/U2irt?ct  dischar9ers  to  publicly  owned  treatment  works
(POTW)  and  less  than one percent of the facilities have a
direct discharge.


Based on the information presented in Section  VII,  it  has
been  demonstrated  that  photographic processing facilities
can  achieve  the  effluent  levels  using   the   indicated
in-process  control  and  end-of-pipe treatment technologies
described in  this  guidance  document.    To  determine  the
30-day  average  and  single-day  maximum silver values, the
plant  data  mean  was   multiplied   by   the   appropriate
variability  factors listed in Table VII-12.   in the case of
total cyanide,  the computed single-day variability factor of
12 is inordinately high.   A large number of  cyanide  values
were  reported  which  were  at  the  detection limit of the
analytical procedures used (0.005  rag/liter).    This  caused
the  distribution of data to be badly skewed  and resulted in
the  high  variability  factor.    For   this   reason   the
                            1-2

-------
variability  factors for total cyanide were  calculated  using
the   individual  plant  data  given   in   Table  VII-4.   The
calculated total cyanide variability  factors at a  99 percent
confidence   level are 3.7 for the single-day maximum and 1.2
for  the  30-day average maximum (see Table VII-12).

Chromium is  used in bleach formulations  for  one color   print
film and for black and white reversal motion picture films.
No known plants  in  the  photographic   processing  industry
using    these  processes  treat  their   wastewater  for the
specific reduction  of  total  chromium,  and  therefore  no
chromium data  from  treated  effluent  were available.  The
total chromium variability factors determined for  the   metal
finishing industry  are  used  to  determine the  30-day and
single-day maximum limits.  These factors are 1.43 and  4.94,
respectively.  The average total chromium concentration  in
the  effluents from all plants studied in the metal finishing
industry was  0.57  ing/liter  after  treatment consisting of
chromium    reduction,    chemical    precipitation,     and
clarification.   The  addition  of  filtration  reduced the
effluent chromium level to  0.32  mg/liter.   The  pollutant
amounts   were  calculated using these concentrations and the
average  hydraulic load of 157,000 liters/1,000 sq  m  (3,850
gal/1,000  sq  ft) for the photographic  processing industry.
It is recommended that  the  after  dichromate  bleach  wash
water  and waste dichromate bleach be segregated and treated
separately from other wastewaters.  This'reduces the  volume
of   wastewater  that  must  be treated and reduces potential
interferences from other photoprocessing  chemicals.

The  following toxic pollutant levels are  given in  the  form
of   amount   of   pollutant   per   unit    of   production.
Concentration  levels  are  also  given   for   informational
purposes.    The  Agency  does  not  recommend  the  use  of
concentration based limitations for  controlling  pollutants
at   facilities  i.n  the  industry.   There   is,   as shown in
Section  VII,  a poor relationship between  concentration  and
the  amount  of pollutant discharged.   The Agency encourages
the  reduction of  wastewater  quantities  by  various  water
saving   controls.     Concentration   limitations  for  this
industry tend  to  discourage  water  use  reductions.    The
silver   concentrations  given below were  calculated from the
production normalized amounts  and  the  average  production
normalized hydraulic load for the industry.   For cyanide and
chromium,  the production normalizing factor is based on the
                            1-3

-------
amount  of  material   processed   using   ferricyanide   or
dichromate bleach, respectively.
                             1-4

-------
I.   Silver Controls

Conventional Silver Recovery
                   Variability
                   Factor	

Plant data mean
 (from Table VII-6)
30-day average
 maximum                1.3
Single-day
 maximum                4.2
          Effluent  Silver
          Amount,
          kg/1,000  sq m     Concentration,
          (lb/1,000 sg ft)   mq/liter	
          0.14 (0.029)

          0.19 (0.038)

          0.59 (0.12)
                  0.90

                  1 .1

                  3.7
Conventional Silver Recovery Plus Ion Exchange Treatment of
Wash Waters
                   Variability
                   Factor
Plant data mean
 (from Table VII-8)
30-day average
 maximum
Single-day
 maximum
1.3

4.2
          Effluent Silver
          Amount,
          kg/1,000 sq m
          (lb/1,000 sq ft
0.048 (0.0098)

0.062 (0.013)

0.20 (0.041)
                  Concentration,
                  mg/liter
0.31

0.40

1 .31
                             1-5

-------
Conventional Silver Recovery plus Reverse Osmosis Treatment of
Wash Water and Precipitation of Silver from Concentrate
                   Variability
                   Factor
Plant data mean
 (from Table VI1-8)
30-day average
 maximum
Single-day
 maximum
1 .3

4.2
          Effluent Silver
          Amount,
          kg/1,000 sq m
          (lb/1,000 sq ft
0.0088 (0.0018

0.011  (0.0023)

0.037  (0.0076)
                  Concentration,
                  mg/liter	
0.06

0.07

0.24
                            1-6

-------
II. Cyanide Controls

Ozone Regeneration of Ferricvanide Bleach

                                  Effluent Total
                                  Cyanide Amount,
                   Variability    kg/1,000 sq m     Concentration
                   Factor         (lb/1,000 sq ft)* Range,** mq/liter

Plant data mean
 (from Table VII-3)               4.8 (0.98)        0.4-1.4
30-day average
 maximum                1.2       7.3(1.2)
Single-day
 maximum                3.7       24 (3.6)

Ozone Regeneration of Ferricvanide Bleach plus Ferrous Sulfate
Precipitation Treatment on Waste Fix

                                  Effluent Total
                                  Cyanide Amount,
                   Variability    kg/1,000 sq m     Concentration
                   Factor         (lb/1,000 sq ft)* Range,*** mq/liter

Plant data mean
 (from Table VII-4)               1.1 (0.23)        0.7-10
30-day average
 maximum                1.2       1.7 (0.28)
Single-day
 max imum                3.7       5.9(0.85)
**
     Based on amount of material processed with ferricyanide bleach
     The plants exhibiting this concentration range have a
     ferricyanide bleach production range of 0.3 to 15 percent
     of the total production.
***  The plants exhibiting this concentration range have a
     ferricyanide bleach production range of 4 to 100 percent
     of the total production.

NOTE:  The cyanide concentration in the effluents from plants
       using ferricyanide bleach may exhibit wide variations
       related to the ratio of ferricyanide production to the
       total production.
                            1-7

-------
III. Chromium Controls

Chromium Reduction, Precipitation, and Clarification Treatment
of Dichromate Bleach Wastes
                   Variability
                   Factor
          Effluent Total
          Chromium Amount,
          kg/1,000 sq m     Concentration,
          (lb/1,000 sq ft)   mq/liter
Plant data
(see text

)
mean






0

.088

(

0.01

8)

0.

57
30-day average
maximum
Single-day
maximum






Chromium Reduction,
Filtration

Treatment
1 .

4.
43

94
0

0
Precipitation,
of Dichromate
.13 1

.43 1
:o

:o
.026

.089
)

)
Clarification,
Bleach
0.

2.
and
82

8

Wastes
                   Variability
                   Factor
Plant data mean
 (see text)
30-day average
 maximum
Single-day
 maximum
1 .43

4.94
          Effluent Total
          Chromium Amount,
          kg/1,000 sq m     Concentration,
          gb/1,000 sq ft)   mq/liter	
0.049 (0.010)

0.070 (0.014)

0.24 (0.049)
0.32

0.46

1 .6
                            1-8

-------
                         SECTION II


                          SUMMARY
The photographic processing industry consists of  facilities
which  process various silver halide sensitized photographic
products for external customers.   There  are  approximately
11,000  processing  facilities  distributed  throughout  the
United States.  More  than  99  percent  of  the  facilities
discharge  wastewater  to  POTW's;  less than 20 plants were
found  that  discharge  directly  to  surface  waters.   The
industry  is divided into four groups: portrait studios (SIC
7221), commercial studios (SIC  7333),  photofinishers  (SIC
7395),  and  movie film processors (SIC 7819).  The majority
of facilities (about 9,900) process less than 93 sq m (1,000
sq ft) of product per day and account for about  12  percent
of  the  total U.S. production.  The emphasis of information
gathering during this study  was  directed  to  plants  with
production  greater  than 93 sq m per day which, as a group,
accounts for  1,100  plants  and  88  percent  of  the  U.S.
production.

Photographic processing consists of treating a silver halide
sensitized  material with a series of chemical solutions and
wash water steps to produce a visible  image  in  black  and
white  or color.  There are more than 20 different processes
used with variations  in  the  solution  chemistry  and  the
sequence  of  solution treatment.  Most facilities process a
variety of materials and use more than one  process.   There
was  no  strong  basis for subcategorization of the industry
based on process use or any of the other factors considered.

The major sources  of  process  wastewater  are  from  waste
chemical   solutions  and  waste  wash  waters.   The  toxic
pollutants found in significant amounts  in  the  plant  raw
wastewater are silver, cyanide, and chromium.  The silver is
contained in the emulsion of all the processed materials and
is  present in the wastewaters from all facilities.  Cyanide
and chromium are present in some  bleach  solutions  in  the
form   of   ferri-ferrocyanide   and  dichromate  compounds,
respectively, and are present in the wastewaters  from  only
those  facilities  which  use  these types of bleach.  It is
recognized that  silver  and  cyanide  in  wastewaters  from
                           II-l

-------
photoprocessing  facilities  are  not  in a free ionic state
but, rather, the silver is combined with  thiosulfate  as  a
silver  thiosulfate complex and the cyanide is combined with
iron  as  an  iron  cyanide  complex   (ferri-ferrocyanide).
Cadmium  may  also  be  present  in  the wastewaters in some
facilities.   It  is  present  in  the  emulsion   of   some
photographic  materials  and  appears  in the wastewaters of
facilities which  process  these  materials.   Industry  has
stated  that an effort is being made to eliminate cadmium as
a constituent of these materials.

The industry removes up to 85  percent  of  the  silver  and
cyanide,   using   conventional  in-process  controls  which
recover the silver from waste-fix solutions  and  regenerate
ferricyanide bleach for reuse.  Other in-process controls in
use include ferric EDTA bleach regeneration and process tank
squeegees  which  result  in  general waste load reductions.
These   in-process  controls  are  almost  universally   used
throughout  the  industry and are primarily for the economic
benefit gained from silver recovery and chemical savings.

Advanced in-process controls, consisting of ion exchange  or
reverse  osmosis,  countercurrent  washing,  and  wash water
recycle, are used by some plants.  Ion exchange  or  reverse
osmosis  is  used for  recovery of silver from after-fix wash
water which contains approximately 10 percent of the totally
available  silver.  Countercurrent  washing  and  wash  water
recycle  (after  ion exchange or reverse osmosis) reduce  the
overall plant  hydraulic  load.  Although there  may  be  some
additional   economic  benefit   from  using  these  advanced
controls,   the   usual  purposes  are  conservation  and   the
environmental  benefit.   The  use  of these in-process controls
in    conjunction  with   standard   silver   recovery    and
ferricyanide regeneration reduces silver and  cyanide   loads
by  up to an additional nine  percent.  Controls  involving  the
recycle or reuse of recovered  chemicals are not universally
applicable  to   all    processes,   products,   or     plant
configurations  because  of   the potential  effect on product
quality.   Ion  exchange and reverse osmosis  treatment of wash
waters  represent complex advanced   technology   and   requires
careful design,  selection   and  installation  of equipment,
close operating  attention, and  proper maintenance  to  achieve
reliable results.   These requirements  could limit   potential
applications of  this  technology.
                            II-2

-------
End-of-pipe wastewater treatments are not widely used in the
photographic  processing  industry.  Some plants treat waste
fix after silver recovery with ferrous sulfate precipitation
and settling  to  reduce  the  ferricyanide  load  prior  to
discharge.    Other   treatments   such   as   equalization,
neutralization, aeration, ozonation, and filtration are used
at some plants for waste load  reduction  to  meet  specific
locally imposed effluent quality requirements.

The  use  of  dichromate  bleach  is  generally  limited  to
facilities  which  process  movie  film   and   only   those
facilities  will have chromium in their wastewater effluent.
There are no known facilities in the photographic processing
industry which regenerate dichromate bleach or  treat  their
wastewater to reduce the amount of chromium discharged.  One
facility  uses a replenishment-on-demand system to limit the
amount of dichromate  bleach  used  to  the  minimum  amount
required  by  the process.  The metal finishing industry has
demonstrated  that  a  treatment   system,   consisting   of
hexavalent  chromium  reduction,  pH adjustment for chromium
precipitation, and filtration, is effective in reducing  the
amount of chromium discharged.

One photographic processing plant has installed an extensive
in-process  control  and  end-of-pipe  treatment  system  to
approach zero wastewater  discharge.   The  system  includes
advanced  solution reuse, wash water recycle,  countercurrent
washes,  reverse  osmosis,  ion  exchange,  and  multi-stage
evaporation.  The applicability of this system to the entire
photographic processing industry appears to be limited.  The
plant using the system is a very large portrait studio which
can  control  the  number and type of products and processes
used.  The system may not be practical for small and  medium
plants for economic reasons and for plants with more complex
product mixes for technical reasons.

This  study included the gathering of information related to
the cost of installing and operating the various  in-process
controls    and    end-of-pipe    treatment    technologies.
Conventional silver recovery  and  ferricyanide  and  ferric
EDTA  bleach  regeneration  result  in  a  substantial  cost
benefit to the facilities using them because of the recovery
of  raw  materials.   These  recovery  operations   are   an
important contributor to the profitability of  a facility and
are  almost  universally  used in the industry.  These costs
                           II-3

-------
were included in this study for the information of those few
facilities which do not use these in-process controls.   The
facilities  using advanced in-process controls consisting of
silver recovery from wash water, countercurrent washing, and
wash water recycle and end-of-pipe treatments consisting  of
ferricyanide  precipitation  and  wastewater evaporation are
doing so for the environmental benefit.  There appears to be
a net cost benefit  for  the  larger  plants  which  recover
silver from wash waters.  The remainder of the controls have
a negative cost impact.
                            II-4

-------
                        SECTION III

       CHARACTERISTICS OF THE INDUSTRY AND PROCESSES
INDUSTRY DESCRIPTION

The photographic processing point source  category  consists
of  photographic  processing plants processing silver halide
sensitized photographic materials to produce continuous-tone
black and white or color negatives, positive transparencies,
and prints for delivery to external  customers. .  There  are
approximately 11,000 such photographic processing facilities
in  the  United States found among businesses in four Bureau
of  the  Census  Standard  Industrial  Classification  (SIC)
codes.

Facilities  primarily engaged in photography for the general
public are classified as  "Photographic  Studios,   Portrait"
(SIC   7221).     Included   in   this   group  are  portrait
photographers and school, home,  and transient photographers,
Establishments  engaged  in   commercial   photography   are
classified  in  "Commercial  Photography, Art, Graphics,  and
Related Design" (SIC 7333).  Facilities primarily engaged in
film developing and print processing for the  trade  or  for
the   general   public   are   included  in  "Photofinishing
Laboratories" (SIC 7395); those engaged  in  motion  picture
film processing are classified in "Services Allied to Motion
Picture  Production"  (SIC 7819).  The 1972 Bureau of Census
determination of the number of establishments classified  by
each  SIC  code  is  given  in  Table  III-l along with some
additional estimates given in the Wolfman Report.
                           III-l

-------
                        TABLE II1-1
      Photographic Processing Establishment Categories

                                       1972 Census

SIC 7221
 Photo Studios, Portrait
  with payroll, oper. entire
  year                                 5,466

SIC 7333
 Commercial Photographic Studios
  with payroll                         2,684

SIC 7395
 Photofinishing Labs
  with payroll                         1,979

SIC 7819
 Services Allied to Motion
  Picture Production, with
  payroll                                855

                                       Wolfman Report

 Major labs (amateur)                    600
 Professional processing labs            775
 School finishers                        100

A breakdown of the number of plants and  the  percentage  of
total production for five categories of plant size  (based on
daily  production)   is  shown  in Table III-2.  The  amount of
production  for  each  size  category  is  expressed  as   a
percentage  of  the  total  U.S.  production estimated to be
approximately 200 million square meters  (2  billion  square
feet)  of  processed  photographic  materials per year.  All
estimates are based on  information  collected  during  this
study   from  various  industry  sources.   The  plant  size
categories and "typical" plant production  for each  category
are  used in Section VIII of this report for the development
of in-process control and treatment costs.
                            III-2

-------
                                 TABLE III-2




          NUMBER OF PLANTS AND PRODUCTION BREAKDOWN BY SIZE CATEGORY
Production
sq rn/day (sq ft/day)
<93 (1,000)
93-186 (1,000-2,000)
186-464 (2,000-5,000)
464-4,640 (5,000-
Production
Size
Category

-------
PROCESS DESCRIPTIONS

Either a two-step or a  single-step  procedure  is  used  to
produce  a  positive  image of the subject on film or paper.
In the two-step procedure  a  chemical  process  called  the
"negative"  process  is  used.   The  first step consists of
producing a  negative  image  on  film,  called  a  negative
transparency,  by  exposing it to light from the subject and
processing  the  film  with  the  negative   process.    The
transparency is then used as a light mask in the second step
to  expose  paper  or  film.   This material is processed by
essentially the same chemical process used in the first step
to produce the  desired  positive  image.   The  single-step
procedure  uses a "reversal" chemical process which directly
produces a positive image of the  subject  on  the  film  or
paper.

The   following  are  detailed descriptions of these negative
and reversal processes.

Black and White Photographic Processing

    General

Black and white film or paper consists of a base material or
substrate, which  is coated with a light-sensitive  emulsion.
Light  sensitivity  is  imparted by distributing silver  halide
crystals  throughout the  emulsion.   When  the  emulsion  is
exposed   to  a  light  image, electrons  are ejected  from  the
impacted  halide atoms.  These "free  electrons" are   in time
trapped   by  crystal   imperfections  or other chemicals.   The
electrons attract positively  charged free silver  ions  in  the
crystal  lattice forming clusters of  metallic silver  at   the
trap  sites.   These clusters of metallic silver, still very
small, form  a  latent image  of the  original   light   exposure
pattern.   During   processing, the developer solution  causes
additional silver to be formed at the  cluster  sites  to   the
extent that  the clusters grow, aggregate, and  form  a visible
image,   a process of chemical amplification.   The film image
then  undergoes further chemical  treatment  to   stabilize   the
image and remove  excess chemicals.   In the  reversal  process,
the  additional   step  of   forming   the   reversal  image   is
required before stabilization.
                            III-4

-------
     Negative  Process
 The  negative process  is   utilized   for   producing   either   a
 negative  or a positive  image  on film or paper.  Three  basic
 chemical processing steps are  generally  used  followed   by   a
 SiS!?«rJ!latfr 4.WaSh<   JTh?Se  steps   consist   of development,
 development stop,  and   fixing.   Often   the   stop   step   is
                             *"  emulsion hardening step  is
    Develop —

The first processing step is developing  in which the  silver
halide  crystals   in  the  gelatin  emulsion are bathed  in a
chemical solution, causing the visible image to form.    This
chemical  solution,  the  developer,  contains  four primary
ingredients:                                               J

(1) A developing agent, usually an organic aromatic compound
     e.g.,   a   mixture   of   hydroquinone    and    Metol
     p-methylaminophenol)   or  hydroquinone  and  Phenidone
    U-pnenyl-3-pyrazolidone)], whose function is  to  cause
    the  previously  formed latent image to grow by reducing
    additional silver ions at the silver cluster sites;

(2) An activator or accelerator,  commonly sodium  hydroxide,
    sodium  carbonate  or  borax (sodium tetraborate) , whose
    «H??«i°I! 1SU   mfke the  developing  agent  sufficiently
    active by pH control;                                  y

(3) A preservative, commonly  sodium  sulfite  or  sometimes
    potassium  metabisulf ite,   whose  function is to prevent
    both oxidation of the developing agent and discoloration
    01 the used developing solution;  and

(4) A restrainer,  either inorganic  (potassium  bromide)   or
    ?fcgaS1C  
-------
    Short Stop—

Following the development step, the film is immersed  in  an
acid  stop  bath  which  neutralizes  and,   to  some extent,
removes the developer absorbed in the  emulsion.   A  dilute
solution  of  a weak acid, e.g., 0.5 percent acetic acid, is
usually used.

    Fix—

The fix step removes unexposed silver halide  by  converting
it  into  a  soluble  complex.   The fixer solution contains
either  sodium  or  ammonium  thiosulfate  ("hypo")  as  the
principal ingredient.  Usually sodium bisulfite or potassium
metabisulfite  is  added  to  cause an acid condition in the
solution to neutralize  any  developer  contamination.   The
sodium  bisulfite  or  potassium  metabisulfite also acts to
prevent oxidation of the thiosulfate.

    Harden—

This step serves to check emulsion swelling  and  raise  its
melting point, thus allowing a higher temperature to be  used
for  drying.   Potash  alum   (potassium aluminum sulfate) is
commonly used as the  hardening  agent  though  chrome   alum
(potassium  chromium  sulfate)   is  sometimes   used.   It is
common to add the alum compound  to the fix solution so   that
the fixing and hardening are accomplished  in a  single step.

    Wash—

A  water wash is the final solution step.   Its  purpose is to
remove the processing chemicals  absorbed in the emulsion or
substrate.

    Dry—

The final processing step  is  drying the photographic  film or
paper  in a dust-free atmosphere.
                            III-6

-------
     Reversal  Process
 The   reversal   process   forms  a direct  positive  image  on  the
 same  material  used  for  the  original   exposure  and   is most
 often  used  for  the production of  motion  picture  films  and
 projection slides.   It  is common to  pre-harden the   emulsion
 in  the first  processing step  because more  steps are used in
 the reversal process which  tend to soften the emulsion.   The
 pre-hardening  solution  contains  hardening   agents   such   as
 formaldehyde      or     succinaldehyde,     an     antifoggant
 (6-nitrobenzimidazole and sodium bromide) and sodium sulfate
 to  retard  emulsion swelling.   After   pre-hardening,    a
 neutralizing    bath    is   used   to   prevent   developer
 contamination.  A  typical   neutralizing  solution   contains
 hydroxylamine   sulfate   and  sodium   sulfate.    The exposed
 material  is fully developed  to a negative using  a  developer
 solution  similar  to that used  in the negative process  except
 that  a  small  quantity of   thiocyanate is added  to  aid in
 dissolving small  non-light   sensitive silver  grains.    The
 film  is then washed and  the  silver negative  image removed by
 bleaching  in  an  acidic  permanganate or dichromate  solution.
 A clearing bath (for example,  bisulfite) is used to  remove
 the   bleaching  agent  and   reaction products,   leaving  the
 undeveloped silver  halide crystals   in  the  emulsion.    The
 emulsion  is   then   given  a uniform light exposure, and  the
 remaining silver  halide  is developed and  fixed   to provide
 the   positive  image.  As an  alternative to this  procedure,  a
 highly  fogging developer or  non-selective  reducer may   be
 used  for the second  development.

 Certain  black  and  white materials,  commonly referred to  as
 reversal products,   yield  a   direct  "reversal"  (positive)
 image   but  are  processed  by   the  conventional   negative
process, i.e.,  no bleach step  is  used.  This is  accomplished
by incorporating appropriate   chemicals  into  the   emulsion
during   the   manufacturing   process.   These   subsequently
produce a reversal  image during developing.
                           III-7

-------
Color Photographic Processing

    General

Unmodified silver halide emulsions are sensitive only  to  a
limited  range  of  wave  lengths, including the blue-^violet
region of the visible  spectrum,  ultraviolet,  and  shorter
wave lengths.  However, certain organic dyes can be included
in the emulsion to extend sensitivity to longer wave lengths
through  the  visible  spectrum into the infrared or to make
the emulsion sensitive to a particular region of the visible
spectrum.  Color films have three separate  light  sensitive
emulsion  layers,  which  after inclusion of the appropriate
dyes, record an image of the blue light  components  on  one
layer,  the  green  light components on another, and the red
light components on the third layer.

The commonly used color materials are color  negative  film,
color  reversal  film,  color  print  film,  and color print
papers.  The three basic processes  for  the  processing  of
color  materials are negative, reversal with couplers in the
emulsion (1C), and reversal with  coupler in  the  developers
(DC).   The commonly used color materials, uses, and process
types are given in Table II1-3.
                            III-8

-------
                         TABLE  II1-3
                   Common Color  Materials

Color  Material     Use                       Process         image

negative  film      original  exposure,        negative        negative
                   intermediate  for
                   copying positive  trans-
                   parencies

positive  print     positive  transparency     negative        positive
 film              from  negative film

reversal  film      original  exposure,        reversal  (1C)   positive
                   intermediate                or             or
                                             reversal  (DC)   negative

positive  print     print from  negative       negative        positive
 paper             film

reversal  paper     print from  positive       reversal  (1C)   positive
                   transparency

Descriptions of these color  processes follow.  They apply to
both film and paper base materials as the steps and chemical
solutions are basically  the  same  for  each.   Where  major
differences occur, they  are  noted.

    Color Negative Process

The first step in the negative process is color development.
Color  development  produces in each layer a dye image and  a
silver image, the amount of  dye generated being proportional
to the silver  developed.    The  images  are  negative  with
respect to the exposure sources.  The dye image is formed by
a  reaction  between  the developer oxidation products and  a
group of  organic molecules called couplers to form  dyes  of
the appropriate color in each  layer.   The developer solution
commonly  contains salts of diethylpara-phenylene diamine or
its derivatives as the developing agent.   The salts  may  be
the  hydrochloride or the sulfate.   Certain newer developing
agents,     such     as     4-amino-N-ethyl-N-[beta-methane-
sulfonamidoethyl]-m-toluidine   sesquisulfate   monohydrate,
                           III-9
                                                 955 aiS 2 at-PP

-------
produce better color rendition and  have  reduced  toxicity.
In  addition to the developing agent, the developer solution
usually contains color-fog restrainers such as hydroxylamine
hydrochloride, a  solvent  such  as  benzyl  alcohol  and  a
contrast   and   color   balance   control   agent  such  as
ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid or citrazinic acid.

The next process step stops development and  removes  excess
developer.   This can be done by washing, but usually a weak
acid stop bath  is  used,  e.g.,  0.5  percent  acetic  acid
buffered  with  sodium  acetate to control pH, followed by a
brief wash.  In some cases  a  stop  bath  is  used  with  a
hardening agent.

The  film or paper  is then bleached to convert the developed
silver  image back to a silver halide in preparation for  the
subsequent  removal  of all silver from the final product by
the fix solution.   The color dye  image remains unaffected in
each layer.  The bleach most commonly used in  the  negative
process   is  the  ferric salt of  ethylenediamine tetraacetic
acid   (ferric  EDTA).   It   is   possible   to   substitute
ferricyanide  bleach  for the ferric EDTA in some processes.
This is done by some large plants incorporating  centralized
ferricyanide  bleach systems which supply bleach to multiple
processes.

After  bleaching, the film or paper is fixed  to  remove  the
silver compounds and washed to remove all excess chemicals.
Finally the emulsion is hardened  and stabilized  using   a   2
percent  formalin   and   3 percent sodium  carbonate  solution,
with the  formalin acting as the dye  stabilizer.  Most   color
paper   processes use a combination bleach-fix  solution  which
converts  silver to  the halide  and dissolves  the  halides  in
one  operation.   The  typical  solution  contains ferric EDTA
and sodium thiosulfate as major  ingredients.

    Color Reversal  Processes

There  are two different  types  of  color   reversal   materials.
 In one,   the  color couplers  which  form the color dye  image
are  incorporated  into  the  emulsion  layers  at   the  time  of
manufacture (1C).   Most  color  reversal  materials are of this
 type.    The  second  type   has three black and white layers,
                           111-10

-------
 each  sensitive  to  a   different   color.    For   this   type  of
 material,   the   color  couplers  are  added during  development
 (DC).   The  (1C)  process applies  to film  and paper materials,
 and the (DC) process  applies  to  film.    The   procedures   and
 chemistry for reversal  color  processing  are described  below.

    Color Reversal Process  (1C)—

 The   first  step  in  the   color reversal  process  for  (1C)
 materials is to  pre-harden  and develop the film or paper  in
 a  highly alkaline negative developing solution to produce a
 negative silver  image in each   layer.    This developer  is
 similar  to    that   used  for  black   and   white   reversal
 development.  Color couplers  are not affected  during  this
 step.   A small amount of thiocyanate added to the developing
 solution  aids   in  dissolving   small,   non-light sensitive
 silver  halide grains, thus  eliminating   a source of  image
 fog.    Following the  negative development step, the  material
 is washed or treated  in stop  and hardening  solutions.    The
 emulsion  is  then  re-exposed   to   a  strong light source,
 exposing the undeveloped silver  halide.   The  material   is
 further  developed  in   a   color developer   solution  which
 reduces the remaining silver  halide  to   silver   and  reacts
 with  the  couplers   to produce a positive dye image  of  the
 appropriate color  in  each of  the three   layers.   The  color
 developer  formulation   is  similar to the developer  used  for
 color negative   materials.    In  some  processes,  a  highly
 fogging  color   developer   is  used  in   place  of the light
 re-exposure.  The dye development  is  usually  followed   by
 hardening,  stop and wash  steps, which  in turn are  followed
 oy bleaching.   A commonly used film  bleach  is  a  potassium
 ferricyanide  and  potassium bromide solution which  converts
 the developed silver  to  silver bromide.   EDTA bleach is also
 used  for  certain  film  processes,   and  an   EDTA   based
 bleach-fix  is   commonly used for reversal papers.   The film
 or paper is then fixed  to remove the silver bromide, washed,
 stabilized,  and  dried.

    Color Reversal Process  (DC)—

Color reversal   (DC)   film  processing   is  complicated  and
requires  rigorous chemical  control of solutions.   The first
development  step, as with the reversal (1C) materials,  forms
                          III-ll

-------
a negative silver image in all three  layers.   After  this,
all  three  layers  in  the emulsion are treated separately.
First, the red-sensitive layer is prepared  for  development
by exposure to red light through the base of the film.  This
exposes  the  remaining  undeveloped  silver  halide in that
layer.  The other two layers, which are not sensitive to red
light, are unaffected.  The film is  treated  with  a  color
developer  that  contains,  among  many other ingredients, a
coupler which  forms  a  red-absorbing  (cyan)  dye  in  the
red-sensitive  layer.  As the color developing agent reduces
the silver halide and forms an  image,  the  oxidized  color
developer  in  the  vicinity  of the developed silver grains
forms the positive cyan dye image.

After washing, the film is exposed from the  top  with  blue
light  exposing  the  undeveloped  silver  halide in the top
blue-sensitive layer.  A yellow filter  layer  protects  the
middle  green-sensitive  layer.   A  second color developer,
containing a soluble yellow coupler, produces both a  silver
and  blue-absorbing   (yellow)  positive dye image in the top
layer.

After a second wash,  the  middle  layer   is  developed  and
chemically  fogged   in  a third color developer containing  a
fogging agent and a magenta coupler which  forms  the  final
positive  silver  and  green-absorbing  (magenta) dye image.
The film at this  point  has  a  negative  silver  image,   a
positive  silver  image,  and  a positive  color dye  image in
each  layer.  Following a third wash, the silver  images  are
removed  as  in  the  other color processes by bleaching and
fixing followed by washing and drying.

PROCESSING CHEMISTRY

To  make  up  the  required  solutions  for   processing    a
particular  film or  paper, the processor has  a choice of  (a)
using a kit where all the  necessary  solution  formulations
are included,  (b) using bulk formulations  for each solution,
or    (c)  using  bulk  raw  chemicals.   In   general,  small
processors  use  kits  and   larger   processors   use   bulk
formulations  and  raw  chemicals.  The processor has a wide
latitude  in selecting formulations  for  the  processing  of
black and  white  materials.   For  example, many different
                           111-12

-------
developer  formulations  made  by   any   one   of   several
manufacturers can be used to develop a given black and white
film.   In  color  processing,  the  choice is more limited,
because process solutions are formulated specifically for  a
particular emulsion type.

Because  of  the  broad  range of black and white processing
formulations, individual processes  are  not  identified  by
name;   rather,   formulations  are  named  by  the  various
manufacturers (for example, developers such as Dektol, D-76,
53-D, etc.).   In  color  processing,  where  each  solution
formulation  is  more  limited, the processes generally have
names which  define  the  process  steps  and  the  solution
formulations.    For   a   given   color  emulsion,  several
manufacturers  may  provide  kits   or   formulations   with
different names, but the chemical content is quite similar.

In  references to black and white processing in this report,
no process names are used, only the descriptors, negative or
reversal.  Where appropriate, color processes are referenced
by name.  The process name is used to  identify  a  specific
composition  and  sequence of processing solutions for which
certain  photosensitive   materials   are   designed.    Any
manufacturer  of  photosensitive materials may produce films
or papers designated for processing in any specific process.
Any  manufacturer  of  photographic  chemicals  may  produce
chemicals  intended  to  be  used  for  specific  processing
solutions in any designated process.   The  following  is  a
list  of  the  color processes most often encountered during
this study.
                          111-13

-------
Material Type                     Process Name

Color negative process film       C-22, C-41, MC-42, ECP-1,  ECP-2
                                  ECN-1,  ECN-2

Color reversal process film (1C)  E-3, E-4, ME-4, EM-25,
                                  CRI, ECO-3, E-6, E-7M, EA-5

Color reversal process film (DC)  K-12, K-14

Color negative process paper      EP-2, EP-3, MCI 11, 85/86

Color reversal process paper      EPR-5,  EPR-100, P-10
                                  P-18

Over  the  period  of  this   study    the   manufacture   of
photographic  materials designed for  some of these  processes
has been discontinued.  As the  stocks  of these materials  are
depleted  there  will  no  longer  be   a   need    for    the
corresponding  processes.   The processes   included in this
category are C-22, ECN-1, E-3,  E-4, K-12, and EPR-5.

The schematic process diagrams  for the listed processes   are
included  in  Figures  III-l  through  111-19.   Dashed  lines
represent  optional  steps  or  operations.   The  optional
recycle  of  fix  is  applicable  only when electrolytic silver
recovery  methods  are  used.   The   additions   of   make-up
chemicals,  regeneration  chemicals,   or air required in  the
various bleach regeneration processes are  not shown  in   the
following  schematics.   This   information   is   given in  the
discussion of the  regeneration methods   in the  following
subsections.

The   process    solution   chemicals   lose  activity,   are
transformed by chemical reaction,  and are  contaminated   by
chemicals  from   the emulsion  and by drag-in  from previous
solutions.  There  is also volume reduction or   concentration
changes due  to  absorption of  solution into the emulsion  and
evaporation.  Drag-in and drag-out of solution   are  usually
not   factors  because   they  are approximately  equivalent  and
cause no net  volume  change.   To alleviate  the  effects   of
chemical   transformation   and  volume  reduction,  it is common
practice   to  replenish   the   solutions   with   fresh   or
                           111-14

-------
                    jS
                    zS
                 < u

                 3=*- ™
                 HSS
                 ,T M°- tt
                 gcoOui
                 PUJ t- >
                 S0 < S
111-15

-------
S 5
                               I	
               111-16

-------
111-17

-------
111-18

-------
111-19

-------
111-20

-------
51
UJ U
-J ~
« £
          rv
          i  2'
|m uj I

I  UJ I
I  CC i
OR

LO
REM-JET

EMOVA
                              I	!
             111-21

-------

CLEARING
1
3
ii
<
•
J
COLOR
i
1
0

I

i
1
4
J
c

J

t
<
i
(
.


X
l-
0)

j
1
DEVELOP
i
C
o
£
»
,

E
U
3
C
t
C
1
>
t
f
\

.
I
>
u
3
i


UJ
t-
s

Ul
3

Ul
— ». M
3

Ul
s


IU
_». V)
3

Ul
3


Ul
t-
3





REPLENISH

ec
ut _
3

X
2
1
i

WATER

ta
Z
1 «


oc
Ul
3


f
Q
^
STABILIZE
I,
X
3
J,
X
IL
_ J L _

V)
3
I
Ul
Q
51
ul U
•1
Ul
u.
_ 1 , -

X
3
1




Ul
3

Ul
_ h-
3

1 	 n
i > '
I j Q .
\ e ^
L- J


UJ
	 fc- 01
3

>j'
i § < 1
1 ui uj 1


Ul
3


111-22

-------

E
Ul
t 	 **
S


la
Z
Ul —f~

a.
ec




REPLENISH
1



I
H" *
<|
s





REPLENIS
J



W

Ul-^
_l
a.
UJ


REPLENISH
1


X
<
5
t

Sfe

u. •"





FIRST
DEVELOP

t

*
C4
^
S


i
i

REM-JET
REMOVA
! ,




CC
1-
3
Ul
Z
t
PREHARDEN
1

Ul

£

0 a.
1"

tc o
> Ul
o w



uj
— *• U)
<



Ui

^
5





UJ
— »• (o
1





	 k-CA
<
5


LU
1


CC
1- — *-
S


£

a.
ec i
i
i


to
Z
w — *•
_J
a,
IU
E


X

—f- (IT 	 f~
I ^t



L


E
UJ
< *

5

u, O
s Ea
il""


REPLENISH
I


X


i ,

X







BLEACH-"
NEUTRALIZ

1 :
Ul
. a
R5
< >

•8





VI
s
1 :




° £
uJ to
to

i ,
COLOR
DEVELOP
1

Ul

£

I 	 1
1 > 1
1 a tt i
| £ uj 1

' S u '
I cc r
L J


a
cc
P «2r:
-"5r-*g5£
a

u.
o t
0 < '
— r~ ^ * i
W U 1
5> £ 1-





Ul
-*- M
e





£


Ul
i

                                 i
                                 O £
                               f s Si
                               w cc p
                                 SUl 
-------
111-24

-------
      a.



      i
111-25

-------
\
WASH
t
COLOR
DEVELOP
YELLOW
t
r
3
i

COLOR
DEVELOP
CYAN


WASH
t
DEVELOP
t
WASH
t
PHIHAKOFN
t

" <
3

3
c
a. 1
g '


5 31 t £
L J


— *f|rf
T
UJ 1
l~ ff J
~^i £
3 j
a.
U
uj
"" <

^ <
3

" <
3




c
< *
|-
S •:
z i
a.
z


DEPLENISH
I


X
3

cc

WATER

a.

1
a
t
1
~t~
X

i
t
BLtACH
enmcYANiuE
11-
+
WASH
t
COLOR
DEVELOP
MAGENTA
t
X
3
t
L MAGENTA
REVERSAL
i



5
	
r
i
i
L


1
1
1


s i
o

r
i
i
L

s

s

                   ^
111-26

-------

a
cc C
3 r
8£
>
3
Cl
<
•
J
CC C
3 •
3;
i

&
<
*

G
<:
i
i
c
j
08
u.
u.
3
ffi
,
REMJET
J


IS
> -i
i >•
,
5
t
•
i
L
: z
J U
^


L
1
t
»
i

.
J
U
>
LJ
|J
,
X
5
i
a.
Q
,


r 1

i
U! |
UJ D 1
1- Ul '
**• £T
sH
D ,
0 '
U 1
r n
1 o 8 1 1
1 	 1


UJ
s


Ul
1-

Ul
s

Ul
1-
s






cc
UJ 	
s

X
z
_J
a.
U)
" j ^
I
i

w
Z
s
1

cc
Ul
3

X
z
a.
CC

cc
Ul
h- 	 »


t

a
1 1
r
 o
J 1
X
a
1





Ul
1-
	 *• V)

r~ ~\
i >
1 £ LU
' S o
1 S
L J


IZP
1 ffi ui
L ""_J


UJ
S

r i
u>
'Is
L__
i
s !
- I
i- * i
_,__^ t/t cc -rfl
< UJ
s i
3
O
U


111-27

-------
X £
u. O
± m
u u
< E
3*
a "
 1	1
    CCl

     J
        I	1
        1 ---   J
                    I O
                    X 5
                    t- O
= 5
3i
8g
                    o a:
                    Ul MI
                    EC >
                    o i
                    Z m
111-28

-------
111-29

-------
                I"
          t  ce'
          I    I
          1	1
I U <1


;sil

L—<=J
111-30

-------
                              ec
                              =a
                              ta
111-31

-------
111-32

-------
         i	J '
_ i,	
 111-33

-------
reconstituted chemicals.   For example, with use,  a developer
gradually loses its effectiveness.  The concentration of the
developing ' agent  and  the  pH decrease, and the halide ion
accumulates.  The developer  replenishing  solution  usually
contains  a  higher  concentration of developing agents than
the original solution and little or  no  bromide.   It  also
contains alkali to help maintain a constant pH.

The  replenishment  is at a continuous or programmed rate on
continuous process machines.  The rate of  replenishment  is
greater  than  the  normal  volume reduction resulting in an
overflow of solution.  This reduces accumulation of unwanted
chemicals in the process tank.  Batch replenishment  may  be
used on "dip and dunk machines" or with manual processing.

Some  processors  practice  a  type  of replenishment called
"replenishment on demand" whereby the critical  constituents
(for  example,  chromate)  of the solution are monitored and
replenishment is done by batch in the required  amount  when
these  constituents  are  reduced  to  predetermined levels.
Although overflow  is  still  allowed  to  occur  to  reduce
unwanted  chemical  accumulation,  proponents of this method
claim that the waste load is  reduced  from  that  found  in
continuous  replenishment  because  of higher efficiency.  A
further explanation of this method is given in a  subsequent
section of this report, Reconstitution of Dichromate Bleach.

PROCESSING EQUIPMENT

Photographic  materials  may be processed either manually or
in automatic processing  machines.   Manual  processing  and
certain  automatic  "drum"  machines  are  suited  to custom
processing  or  processing  small  quantities  of  material.
Manual processing is predominately suited to very small labs
but  may  be  found  in  the larger labs as well.  Automatic
processing machines (with the exception of drum  processors)
have the capability for high production rates and are suited
to the larger labs.

A  manual  processing  method,  sometimes called "sink line"
processing, consists of manually placing,  for  the  correct
time  and in proper sequence, exposed photo material in each
of a series  of  trays  or  tanks  containing  the  required
                          111-34

-------
chemical  solutions.   A  second manual technique utilizes a
single tank or drum.  The photo material is  placed  in  the
tank  or  drum and the first processing chemical solution is
poured  into  the  container.   After  remaining   for   the
proscribed  time,  the  solution is dumped and replaced with
the second solution.  This process is  continued  until  all
solutions  have  been  used.   An  automated version of this
process, called automatic drum  processing,  consists  of  a
motorized  rotating  drum  and  preprogrammed,  electrically
operated solution fill and dump valves.

Most photoprocessors, as  included  in  this  study,  handle
large quantities of film and paper with automatic processing
machines.   The  three  types  most widely used are "dip and
dunk," roller transport, and continuous length processors.

The "dip and dunk" processor, an automated version of  "sink
line"  processing,  is  generally  used for roll films.  The
machine consists of a series  of  deep  tanks,  elevator  or
lifter  mechanisms, and a movable track or chain drive.  The
film is attached to hangers, automatically transferred  from
tank  to  tank  by the lifter mechanism and deposited in the
tank by the movable track.   A  limited  adjustment  of  the
processing  times in individual tanks is possible.  The film
is dried in a drying tunnel that is part of the machine.   A
second  type  of  dip  and  dunk  processor  is an automatic
version of manual basket processing.  The  film,  plates  or
paper are loaded onto reels or baskets.  The entire assembly
is  moved  on  an overhead gantry that raises and lowers the
basket into each process tank at preprogrammed times.

Roller transport machines consist of a  series  of  solution
tanks  and  use  a combination of pinch rollers and belts to
feed the photo  materials  through  each  solution  tank  in
succession.  Roller transport machines are commonly used for
sheet  film,  narrow  widths of professional and aerial film
and large format (up  to  1.3  meters  wide)  prints.    They
require no leader and are suited to the processing of single
pieces of film or paper at high production rates.

The  continuous length processor is generally used for movie
films and long rolls of film and  paper.    Short  rolls  can
also  be  accommodated  by splicing the short rolls together
                          111-35

-------
end on end to make a long  length.   The  continuous  length
processor  consists  of a series of deep tanks, roller racks
or transports in each tank, and feed and take-up mechanisms.
The feed and take-up mechanisms usually include a slack  box
to facilitate splicing without stopping the main drive.  The
film  travels  back and forth in each processing tank over a
series of rollers on the rack.  The path length  and  linear
film  speed  are adjusted to give the desired residence time
in each tank.  Upon exiting a tank, the film travels to  the
next tank over roller connections between racks.  Continuous
processing  units  are  time-consuming  to  thread  and  are
commonly threaded with leader stock.  The starting end of  a
material to be processed is attached to the leader end which
then guides the material through the machine.  New leader is
attached to the end of the processed material and remains in
the  machine  ready  for  the next run.  It is common to run
leader before and after production runs for quality  control
purposes  to  inspect  for  mechanical abrasion problems and
chemical balance.  A  short  photosensitive  test  strip  is
attached  to  the  leader  for  the  chemical balance check.
During leader run there is generally either no replenishment
or reduced rate replenishment of some solutions.  Wash water
usually runs at the normal production rates.  The wastewater
hydraulic load is comparable to production loads.  Pollutant
loading is reduced to essentially that  caused  by  solution
carryover  into  the  wash  waters.   No  additional  silver
loading occurs since the leader has no silver emulsion.

The ratio of leader to production varies widely and  depends
on  the  machine type and  the materials processed.  "Dip and
dunk" machines require no  leader.  Roller transport machines
have pinch roller  feed  guides  which  require  no  leader.
Plants that predominately  use these machines have a very low
leader  to  production  material  ratio.  On the other hand,
plants using  continuous   machines  and  processing  amateur
materials  consisting  of  short  lengths of narrow film and
paper may have a leader to production material ratio of  one
or  more,  i.e.,  they  may  run more  leader than production
material.  If possible, the processor will splice the  short
film  end  on  end  to  create  a long continuous length and
reduce the need for leader.   However,  this   is  often  not
possible  because  of  the promise  to  the customer to  return
the finished  product  quickly.   A  quick   turnaround  time
                           111-36

-------
requires machines to be continually  "at ready," resulting  in
numerous  short runs, relatively large amounts of  leader run
and frequent quality control checks.  The movie labs,  which
use  similar  machines and process similar film widths, have
leader to film ratios on the order of  0.1  to  0.5  because
they  process  comparatively long lengths and can  plan their
production more efficiently.

Most automatic processing machines have automatic  agitation
and  solution  replenishment.  The method most commonly used
for agitation is called gas-burst agitation  which consists
of  releasing  gas through tiny holes in a distributor plate
in the bottom of the solution tank at controlled   intervals.
The  gas  bubbles  formed  during release provide  the random
agitation pattern necessary for uniform  results.   Oil-free
compressed  air  is  usually  used   except in the  developers
where nitrogen is used to prevent  oxidation  of   developing
agents.

IN-PROCESS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

In-process  controls are used in the photographic  processing
industry primarily for the conservation or recovery  of  raw
materials   for   economic   purposes  and  secondarily  for
pollution abatement purposes.   Controls  include:  (1)  the
recovery  of  raw  materials  such  as  silver  and  organic
couplers, (2) the regeneration of processing  solutions  for
recycle such as fix and bleach, and  (3) various housekeeping
practices such as water saver controls and squeegees.

Effect of In-Process Controls on Product Quality

In  the  consideration of in-process controls, which involve
the reuse of solutions, recycle  of  wash  water,  or  other
modif icat ions   of   standard!zed   procedures,    two  major
precautions should be taken to ensure that (1)  the  control
is  properly  applied  and  (2) once applied, the  control  is
properly maintained.   Any of these controls,  if not properly
applied and maintained, can cause  immediate  or   long-term,
adverse  effects  on  product  quality.    For"" example, dirt
build-up  can  immediately  cause   pinholes,   spots,    and
scratches;    trace   chemical  build-up,   improper  chemical
balance in the solution,  and insufficient  chemical  removal
                          111-37

-------
from  the  emulsion  can cause (1) stains and improper color
balance in the short term and (2)  poor  dye  stability  and
stains in the long term.

The  first  precaution  concerns  proper  application of the
in-process  control  on  a  process  specific  basis,  i.e.,
successful  application  on  one particular process does not
guarantee success on another.  When a control is applied  to
a  particular  process, it should be established, by testing
product quality, that  there  are  no  short-  or  long-term
adverse  effects.   The  short-term tests include inspection
for stains,  spots,  and  scratches;  color  balance  checks
against  standards;  and  hypo  retention  tests.  Long-term
effects are somewhat more difficult  to  evaluate.   Current
techniques  involve  subjecting  processed  test material to
accelerated aging conditions  prior  to  performing  quality
tests.

The  use  of  many of the various in-process controls, which
are discussed in detail in the  following  subsections,  has
been  demonstrated  and  accepted.   Ferricyanide  and  EDTA
bleach regeneration have  been  established  on  most  color
processes,  and  fix recycling has been successfully used on
many processes.  On a  more  limited  basis,  countercurrent
washing  and  wash  water  recycle have been established for
some processes.  Developer  recycle  has  been  successfully
used  on  a  few color paper processes.  Low flow prewash is
still being evaluated.

The second precaution concerns proper use and maintenance of
the in-process control to ensure continued high standards of
product  quality.   In  some  cases,  strict  adherence   to
recommended maintenance and use procedures may be sufficient
to  ensure  a  quality product.  In others, careful  chemical
monitoring of process solutions or wash water  and   periodic
product  tests  may  be  required  in addition to in-process
control equipment maintenance and use  requirements.    (Note
that  in-process control use procedures may require  chemical
monitoring of  some  solutions.)   Finally,  the  origin  or
end-use  of  the  material  being  processed  may  have some
bearing on the  use  of  a  particular  in-process   control.
Solution regeneration and wash water recycle do  increase the
risk  of  reduced long-term stability or product damage.   In
                           111-38

-------
cases where a process is used for unique film  originals  or
where the product must have archival storage capability, the
risks  imposed  by  use  of  an  in-process  control  may be
unacceptable.

Silver Recovery

Two photoprocessing waste solutions contain essentially  all
silver  removed during processing: (1) the fix or bleach-fix
overflow and (2) the post-fix wash water.

The state-of-the-art of silver recovery  from  the  fix  and
bleach-fix    processing    solutions    includes   metallic
replacement,    electrolytic    recovery,    and    chemical
precipitation.    Ion  exchange and reverse osmosis are other
methods that can  be  used  alone  or  in  combination  with
conventional  silver  recovery  systems. .However, these are
generally considered suitable only for dilute  solutions  of
silver,  such  as  the polish desilvering of effluent from a
silver recovery unit or wash water desilvering.

These silver recovery systems can be used in  a  variety  of
ways.  It is typical to have a primary silver recovery unit,
which  removes  the  bulk  of  silver, in combination with a
"tailings" unit.  Tailings consist  of  the  relatively  low
silver concentration effluent from a primary silver recovery
system.   A tailing unit is used as a secondary or polishing
unit for additional silver  recovery.    The  typical  system
consists  of  an  electrolytic  primary  unit and a metallic
replacement tailing unit.  A silver recovery system  can  be
devoted to a single process line or be used to remove silver
from  the  fix  from several or all process lines in a plant.
The multiple use systems are found  in  the  larger  plants.
Sometimes  a  separate  fix  system  is  used for processing
unique  original  film  to   reduce   the   possibility   of
inter-process contamination (when desilvered fix is recycled
to  the  process)   and the resultant damage to irreplaceable
originals.

    Metallic Replacement

Metallic replacement occurs when  a  metal,   such  as  iron,
comes  in  contact with a solution containing dissolved ions
                          111-39

-------
of a less active  metal,  such  as  silver.   The  dissolved
silver,  which  is  present  in  the  form  of a thiosulfate
complex, reacts with solid metal  (iron);  the  more  active
metal  goes  into solution as an ion, and an ion of the less
active metal becomes solid metal (silver).

Silver ions will displace ions of many of the common  metals
from   their  solid  state.   Because  of  its  economy  and
convenience, iron in the form of steel  wool  is  used  most
often.  Zinc, as a replacement metal, can also be effective,
but it is not used because of its relatively higher toxicity
and  greater  cost.   Aluminum  has  also  been  used  as  a
replacement metal but  is  not  commonly  used  because  the
simultaneous generation of hydrogen gas could be hazardous.

For most efficient operation, the pH of the solution passing
through  the  metallic  replacement unit should be between 4
and 6.5, with an optimum between 5 and 5.5.  Below a  pH  of
4,  the dissolution of the steel wool is too rapid.  Above a
pH of 6.5, the replacement reaction may be so slow  that  an
excessive amount of silver would be lost because of the long
reaction time required.

Silver  recovery  by  metallic  replacement  is  most  often
carried out using commercially available units consisting of
a  steel  wool  filled  plastic  bucket   with   appropriate
plumbing.   Typical  practice is to feed waste fix to two or
more canisters in series  or  series-parallel  combinations.
For  two canisters in series, the first canister removes the
bulk of the silver and the second unit polishes the effluent
of the first and acts as a safety factor  if the  first  unit
is overused.  When the first unit is exhausted, it is common
to  replace  it  with  the  second and put a new unit in the
place of the second.  Silver concentrations in the  effluent
from  a  single unit average 40 to 100 mg/1 over the life of
the unit versus a range of 0.1 to 50 mg/1 when two canisters
are used in series.

Desilvered  fix  is  not  recycled  because  of   the   iron
contamination.    The  average  iron  concentration  in  the
cartridge effluent, over the life of the  cartridge, is 4,000
mg/1.  However, this is not a problem with bleach-fix  which
contains  iron  complexed with EDTA as an  active ingredient.
                           111-40

-------
Because of this, metallic replacement silver recovery  is  .a
commonly used first step in the regeneration of bleach-fix.

    Electrolytic Recovery

This  silver  recovery  method  requires  the application of
direct current across two  electrodes  in  a  silver-bearing
solution  causing metallic silver to deposit on the cathode.
Sulfite  and  thiosulfate  are  oxidized  at  the  anode  as
follows:

    HZ0 + 803-2 = S04~2 + 2e- + 2H+    (Anode)

    S03~2 + S203-2 = S306~2 + 2e- (Anode)

    Ag+ + e~ = Ag°      (Cathode)

Approximately 1 gram of sodium sulfite is oxidized for  each
gram  of  silver  plated.   Considerable agitation and large
plating surface areas are necessary to achieve good  plating
efficiency and high quality silver up to 96-98 percent pure.
Lower  silver  purity levels are usually achieved in tailing
cells.  The  cathodes  are  removed  periodically,  and  the
silver  is  stripped off.  Care must be taken to prevent the
current density in  the  cell  from  becoming  too  high  to
prevent    "sulfiding."   Sulfiding   is   the   result   of
decomposition of thiosulfate at the  cathode.   The  sulfide
contaminates  the  deposited  silver  and  reduces  recovery
efficiency.  The higher the silver concentration the  higher
the  current density can be without danger of sulfiding.  As
the silver is plated out of solution,  the  current  density
must be reduced.

Electrolytic units can be used for primary or tailing silver
recovery.    Primary   electrolytic  systems  are  typically
installed in two basic ways.  One is a batch recovery system
where overflow fix from a process line or lines is collected
in a tank.  When sufficient volume is reached, the waste fix
is pumped to an electrolytic cell  for  the  silver  removal
process.  The desilvered fix is either discharged or reused.
For  reuse,  it  is pumped to a mix tank where chemicals are
added to bring it to replenishment strength.  Primary  batch
system  cells  are  usually  designed to desilver the fix at
                          111-41

-------
fairly high starting silver concentrations  of  about  5,000
mg/1.  The silver concentration in the effluent is typically
about  200-500  mg/1  but  can be reduced to 20-50 mg/1 with
additional treatment time and  careful  control  of  current
density.    An  electrolytic  tailing cell typically achieves
the lower range because the process can be optimized for low
starting silver concentrations.

The second primary electrolytic recovery method is to remove
silver from the  fix  solution  from  one  or  more  process
machines   in   a   continuously   recirculating  system  at
approximately the rate at which silver  is  being  added  by
processing.  The recovery cell is included "in-line" as part
of   the  recirculation  system.   This  continuous  removal
technique has the  particular  advantage  of  maintaining  a
relatively  low  silver  concentration in the fix processing
solution so that the amount of silver carried out  with  the
processed  material  into  the  wash tank is minimized.  The
silver concentration in the fix can  be  maintained  in  the
range  of 500 to 1,000 mg/1, the lower limit being primarily
a function of residence time in the cell, i.e., system  flow
rate.

The  recycling  of  desilvered  fix  solution, whether by an
"in-line" continuous system or by batch,  requires  adequate
monitoring  and  process  quality control to protect product
quality.  Parameters which should be monitored  to  maintain
the  physical  and  chemical  properties of the fix solution
include pH, silver, and sulfite concentrations.

    Chemical Precipitation

Chemical precipitation is a relatively uncommon  method  for
recovery   of  silver  from  photographic  processing  waste
solutions  but  is  practiced  widely  in  the  photographic
supplies manufacturing point source category.  Silver may be
precipitated from fixers with sodium sulfide:

     2Ag+ + S-2 = Ag2S

The  precipitation  is quantitative in an alkaline  solution,
and  the resultant silver sulfide has a solubility product of
10-50 making it one of the most insoluble substances  known.
                           111-42

-------
The  physical  characteristics  are  not as favorable as the
chemical characteristics.  Precipitation must be carried out
in alkaline  media  to  avoid  the  generation  of  hydrogen
sulfide.    Silver   sulfide   tends   to   form   colloidal
suspensions.  Its very small particle size makes  filtration
difficult  and  the filter cake produced is extremely dense.
Diatomaceous  earth  filter  aid  can  be  used  to  improve
filtration.   About  three  grams of filter aid are required
for each gram of silver, if a conventional filter  press  is
used.

Sodium  borohydride  is  also  an  effective precipitant for
silver:

    BH4~ + 2HZ0 + 8Ag+ = 8Ag + 8H+ + B02-

This  precipitating  agent  can  also  be  used   to   treat
photographic   processing   wash   waters.   Sodium  sulfide
requires very  little  excess,  while  borohydride  requires
significantly more than the stoichiometric reaction quantity
to  complete  the  reaction.  A major difference between the
two precipitating agents is the  resulting  silver  quality.
Sodium  borohydride  produces  elemental  silver of 90 to 95
percent  purity.   The  sulfide  addition  generates  silver
sulfide containing 87 percent silver.  Silver concentrations
as low as 0.1 mg/1 can be achieved by either method.

In  a  typical system,  the precipitating agent is mixed with
the silver-bearing waste solution in a batch  reaction  tank
equipped  with  automatic  pH control.  The pH is maintained
above 7 to avoid releasing toxic hydrogen sulfide  gas  when
sodium sulfide is used.

The optimum pH range for sodium borohydride precipitation is
6.5  to  6.8.   The solid particles formed (1-2 microns) are
allowed to settle before filtering.

Solutions treated by sodium sulfide  or  sodium  borohydride
cannot be reused in the photographic process.
                          111-43

-------
    Silver Recovery from Wash Waters

Even  with  an efficient fix.solution silver recovery system
and squeegee use at the exit of  the  fix  tank,  up  to  10
percent  of  the  available  silver is lost to the after-fix
wash water by carryover.  The silver  concentration  in  the
wash  water is typically in the range of 1  to 50 mg/1 and it
has not been found practical to use the previously described
conventional silver recovery methods for  recovery  of  this
silver.   Thus, the concentration of silver is generally too
low  for  effective  use   of   electrolytic   or   metallic
replacement   recovery   methods.   In  addition,  the  iron
by-product from metallic replacement precludes the  possible
wash  water  reuse  without  extensive  treatment.  Although
precipitation is technically satisfactory,  it  is  too  slow
and  too  expensive  because  of raw material and filtration
costs to be economical.

Two  methods  have  been  found  to  be  effective  and  are
currently  in  use  for  recovery of silver from wash water,
namely resin ion exchange and reverse osmosis (RO).  A third
method called  "low  flow  prewash"  has  been  used  on  an
experimental   basis   at  two  plants.   This  consists  of
apportioning the after-fix wash water into two  segments,  a
low  volume,  high  silver concentration prewash and a final
wash of low silver content.  Silver can be removed from  the
prewash by conventional methods.

Resin  ion  exchange   is  the  reversible  exchange  of ions
between a solid resin  and a liquid.  A variety of  weak  and
strong  base  anion resins are effective in silver recovery.
Using  chloride  as  the  mobile  ion,  the   following   is
representative of the  reaction:

     [Resin] Cl + AgS203- =  [Resin] AgS203 + Cl~

The  silver  complex   has  a high affinity for the resin and
consequently it is  difficult  to  reclaim  the  silver  and
regenerate  the  resin.   Recently,  a  concentrate has been
developed that accomplishes this task  economically.   Other
problems  such  as  suspended  matter, particularly gelatin,
plugging the resin have also been solved by equipment design
and  operational procedures.
                           111-44

-------
Reverse osmosis   is   a  general  separation   technique.    It
involves  a wastewater stream flowing under pressure  through
an  appropriate porous membrane.  Water  passes   through  the
membrane  as product  and the pollutants remain upstream from
the membrane as  concentrate.  Reverse osmosis is governed  by
membrane  surface phenomena  and  pore  size,   as  well   as
wastewater characteristics.  The membrane surface must be  of
such  a   chemical nature that it has a preferential sorption
or  repulsion for one of  the  constituents  of the fluid
mixture.   Consequently,  the  membrane-liquid   interface  is
enriched  in one  of the solution constituents.  A continuous
flow under pressure through the membrane capillaries  results
in  a  production  solution  (permeate) whose composition  is
different from that of the bulk solution.  For   recovery   of
silver  from  wash  water by reverse osmosis, after-fix wash
water is  equalized, filtered,  and  then  pumped through  a
reverse   osmosis unit.   Silver  can  be  removed  from the
concentrate  by   conventional   silver   recovery    methods
depending on  silver concentration  and  presence of other
pollutants.  Potential problems encountered with the  use   of
reverse   osmosis equipment  for recovering silver from wash
water are fouling of  the  membrane  and  biological   growth.
Proper  maintenance   and  control  are required  to alleviate
these  problems.   One  plant  reported  difficulties   with
membrane  fouling which required frequent replacement of the
membrane  with   a  resulting  high  maintenance  cost.   The
problem   was alleviated by the use of sand filtration in the
waste stream prior to the reverse osmosis unit.

The low flow prewash  system is a relatively new  concept  and
is  still being  evaluated.   This system concentrates most  of
the fix carryout  in a low  volume  after-fix  prewash  tank.
The system consists of segmenting the after-fix  wash tank  to
provide   a  small  prewash  section with separate wash water
make-up and overflow.  The wash water flow can be  optimized
depending  on  the  carryover  silver  concentration and the
level of  treatment.    By design,  the concentrations  of  fix,
silver,  and other chemicals reach high levels in the prewash
tank   under  steady-state  conditions.    There  is  concern
expressed by some investigators that this may cause problems
with the quality of the processed material.    In  effect,   the
processed material receives additional fix time  and exposure
to  potential  contaminants  while  immersed  in  the prewash.
                          111-45

-------
Dye stability tests, performed by one investigator on  color
paper  processed  using  the  prewash  system, have shown an
increase in yellow stain six months after processing.  There
is also a requirement for increased maintenance of the  wash
tank because of biological growth.

Coupler Recovery

The  three  color developers used in the K-14 color reversal
process  (DC)  contain  organic  dye  couplers.   Since  the
couplers  are  in solution, it is common practice to recover
these organic couplers from the waste developer overflow for
economic reasons.  The couplers are not recoverable from the
1C process because they are not in solution.   Instead,  the
color couplers are put into the three emulsion layers during
manufacture  of  the  film  or  paper and remain to form the
color image after processing.

The (DC) couplers  are  soluble  in  the  normally  alkaline
developers  but  will precipitate at neutral or acid pH.  To
recover the couplers, the  pH  of  the  waste  developer  is
adjusted  to  7  or  less with sodium bisulfate and then the
precipitated  couplers  are  extracted  by   centrifugation.
Carbon  dioxide  has  also been used for pH adjustment.  The
photoprocessor may reuse the  couplers  in  the  appropriate
developer  solution.   The  recovery  and  reuse of couplers
requires proper testing and quality  control  procedures  to
avoid  problems  with  color  balance  and saturation  in the
processed films.

Bleach Regeneration

Bleaches are used in the black and white reversal process to
dissolve the negative silver image and in the color  process
to  oxidize  the  developed  silver image to a silver  halide
which is subsequently dissolved in the fix solution.   It  is
common  practice  in  color  processing  to  regenerate  the
reduced bleach for reuse by oxidizing the bleach back  to its
original state or by discharging a portion of the bleach and
adding  fresh  chemicals   to   restore   it   to   original
specifications.   The  main  active  ingredient contained in
color processing bleaches  is  either  sodium  or  potassium
ferricyanide,   ferric  EDTA,  ferric  chloride,  or   sodium
                           111-46

-------
dichromate.   A dichromate bleach is commonly used  in  black
and  white  reversal  processing  and  is  not  regenerated.
Ferric chloride bleach is also not regenerated.   The  reuse
of  regenerated  bleaches  require  various  quality control
measures, depending on  the  bleach  type  and  regeneration
method,  to  ensure  against  adverse effects in the product
from improper chemical  balance,  chemical  impurities,  and
dirt.   These  problems  are  addressed  in more detail in a
preceding subsection on product quality.

    Ferricyanide Regeneration

The basis for all the ferricyanide regeneration methods is a
sufficiently  strong  oxidizing  agent  that  has   reaction
products  compatible  with  or used in the process.  Current
regeneration processes which fulfill these requirements are:

    A. Persulfate regeneration
    B. Ozone regeneration
    C. Electrolytic bleach regeneration
    D. Miscellaneous chemical regeneration methods

    Persulfate Regeneration—

Persulfate regeneration is a  batch  process  consisting  of
collecting   the  bleach  overflow  in  a  tank  and  adding
potassium persulfate to oxidize the ferrocyanide ion back to
ferricyanide by the following reaction:

    2[Fe(CN)6]-* + SaOe-2 = 2[Fe(CN>6]-* + 2SQ4~*

Bromide is also added to replenish  that  taken  up  by  the
silver  during  bleaching.   One problem with the persulfate
method is a build-up of the  sulfate  ion  which  slows  the
bleaching  action.   To  alleviate  the  problem,  about  10
percent  of  the  bleach  is  directly   discharged   before
regeneration or the bleach drag-out rate in the process tank
is  regulated  by  squeegee  adjustment so that a comparable
sulfate reduction occurs.
                          111-47

-------
    Ozone Regeneration—

The  use  of  ozone  for  ferricyanide  bleach  regeneration
minimizes   the  salt  build-up  problems  encountered  with
persulfate regeneration and  reduces  the  need  for  bleach
blowdovm  during regeneration cycling.  The ozone process is
characterized by the following reaction:

    2Na4Fe(CN)« + H20 + 03 = 2Na3Fe(CN)6 + 2NaOH + 02

Stoichiometrically, 12.7 kg of sodium ferrocyanide are  con-
verted  to  11.7  kg  of sodium ferricyanide using 1.0 kg of
ozone.  Under varying conditions of pH, the ozone  oxidation
efficiency    is   near   100   percent   for   ferrocyanide
concentrations above 1.0 gram per liter.

The pH of the bleach increases as the reaction proceeds, and
bromide additions are required to replace the bromide  taken
up  by  the silver.  Therefore, hydrobromic acid is added to
accomplish both pH  adjustment  and  bromide  ion  addition.
Theoretically,   one   bromide  ion  is  required  for  each
ferrocyanide ion that  is  oxidized  to  ferricyanide.   The
hydrobromic  acid  avoids  all build-up of sulfate and other
unwanted by-products.  If, in practice, there  is  a  slight
build-up  of bromide ion, small amounts of sulfuric acid can
be added for  pH  adjustment  with  little  danger  of  high
sulfate build-up.

Some   photoprocessing   plants  have  installed  continuous
in-line  ozonation  for  ferricyanide  bleach  regeneration.
This  technique  permits  a  significant  reduction  in  the
necessary ferricyanide concentration  in  the  bleach  tank,
since the ferrocyanide level in the solution is kept low and
the  ferri  to  ferro  ratio  is  the  controlling factor in
effective  bleaching.   With  a  lower  ferricyanide  bleach
concentration,  there is less drag-out and less pollution of
the waste wash water.

Ozone can be somewhat hazardous because of its toxicity, but
methods  have  been  developed  to  use  it  safely.    Safe
practices  include the use of ozone detectors to monitor the
air in the vicinity of the ozonation tanks.
                          111-48

-------
    Electrolytic Regeneration—

Ferrocyanide can be oxidized to ferricyanide at the anode of
an  electrochemical  cell. '   Because  the  reverse  reaction
occurs  at  the  cathode,  the  cell  must  be  divided by a
semi-permeable membrane, or  some other method of  minimizing
the  cathode  reaction  must  be employed.  The electrolytic
cell reactions are given below:

Anode: [Fe(CN)6]~4 = [Fe(CN)6]~3 + e~ (primary reaction)
       4{OH)~ = 02 + 2H20 +  4e- (secondary reaction)
Cathode:  2HZ0 + 2e~ = H2 + 2(OH)- (primary reaction)
         [Fe(CN)6]~3 + e- =  [Fe(CN)tj-* (secondary reaction)

With improved cell  technology  minimizing  the  undesirable
secondary  reactions  having become available recently, this
method of ferricyanide bleach regeneration has  found  wider
acceptance in the photoprocessing industry.  Like ozonation,
there  is  no  requirement  for  bleach  blowdown during the
regeneration cycle.

    Bromine and Peroxide Chemical Regeneration Methods—

Probably the simplest ferricyanide bleach regeneration tech-
nique, from a chemical point of view, is the use of bromine.
The  bromine  performs  the  ideal  role  of  oxidizing  the
ferrocyanide  and  replacing the bromide ions removed by the
film as it passes through the bleach.  It is  an  economical
method,  there  are no unwanted reaction products, and there
is  minimal   dilution.    Because   of   the   hazard   and
corrosiveness   associated   with  the  handling  of  1iquid
bromine,  however, the method has not been widely accepted.

Bromate  and  bromite  compounds   have   been   used   with
satisfactory results and are somewhat easier to handle.  The
main  reason  for  their not being used more widely has been
hesitation by the  industry  to  handle  chemicals  of  this
nature.

Hydrogen   peroxide   has   also   been  used  successfully.
Hydrobromic acid is added  to  control  pH  and  supply  the
required  bromide  ions.   However,  the problem of handling
peroxide has restricted the use of this method.
                          111-49

-------
    Summary of Ferricyanide Bleach Regeneration Methods—

The  most  popular  methods   are   persulfate   and   ozone
regeneration.     Both   methods   are   efficient  with  the
persulfate yielding about 90 percent of the used bleach  for
recycle  and  the ozone method allowing 100 percent recycle.
Both  methods   require   analytical   monitoring   of   the
regeneration  process.   The persulfate method consists of a
single chemical  addition  requiring  no  special  equipment
beyond  tanks  and  plumbing.   It  does have the problem of
sulfate build-up which must be  corrected  by  up  to  a  10
percent discharge.  Ozonation allows essentially 100 percent
recycle  and is adaptable to continuous in-line regeneration
but  requires  a  larger   investment   in   equipment   and
maintenance.   Electrolytic regeneration is a relatively new
method but appears  to  have  advantages  and  disadvantages
similar to ozonation.

    Ferric EDTA Regeneration

Modifications  in  the  processing  of  certain photographic
materials have resulted in the substitution of  ferric  ions
chelated  with EDTA for ferricyanide as the bleaching agent.
The ferric-EDTA bleach relies upon the  oxidative  power  of
the  ferric  ion  which  is  reduced  to  ferrous ion in the
process.  Ferric EDTA is used alone as a bleach for  certain
color  films  and  is  used  in  combination  with sodium or
ammonium thiosulfate fixer for color paper processing.   The
combined material is known as bleach-fix.

Regeneration  of  the  bleach  involves the oxidation of the
ferrous ion back to the ferric ion and the replenishment  of
various   chemicals,  principally  bromide.   Typically  the
oxidation process is performed as a batch process in a  tank
with aeration.  Some plants aerate the bleach in the process
bleach  tank  using  compressed  air  which  serves the dual
purpose of solution agitation and oxidation.

Regeneration of the waste bleach-fix solution involves three
steps.  First, the silver must be  recovered.   Second,  the
reduced  iron  EDTA  complex must be oxidized back to ferric
EDTA.  Finally, certain  chemicals  lost  through  carryover
                          111-50

-------
with  the  film or paper must be added to bring the solution
up to replenisher strength.

As with the desilvering of waste fixer solutions, there  are
several  techniques  available  to  remove  the  silver from
bleach-fix waste.  The most widely  used  technique  is  the
silver  recovery  cartridge  containing steel wool where the
silver is replaced by iron, and the silver  is  retained  in
the  cartridge.   The  metallic  replacement  method is most
widely  used  both  for  economic  and  practical  operating
considerations.    After  passing  the  bleach-fix  overflow
through  the  silver  recovery  cartridge,   the   resulting
solution  is  aerated to oxidize the ferrous EDTA complex to
the ferric form.  After aeration, the bleach is returned  to
a holding tank where make-up chemicals are added as required
to restore the solution to replenishment strength.

It  is  also  possible to use electrolysis to recover silver
from bleach-fix baths.  Equipment has recently  appeared  on
the  market  which is designed for desilvering bleach-fixers
electrolytically.  This method has some advantages, such  as
better  control  of  iron  concentration  and higher quality
recovered silver, over metallic replacement, particularly in
larger processing laboratories.

Irrespective of technique, it is possible to  reuse  between
70  and 80 percent of the bleach-fixer by regeneration.  The
20 to 30 percent loss is due to a  combination  of  carryout
with  the  paper  or  film  and  excess bleach discharged to
prevent contaminant build-up.

    Reconstitution of Dichromate Bleach

Bichromate bleach is found in processes for  motion  picture
color  negative  print  film  and in processes for black and
white reversal film.  The dichromate bleach  used  in  color
negative   processing   has   the   same   function  as  the
ferricyanide and EDTA bleaches, that  is,  it  oxidizes  the
silver  image  to  silver bromide.  However, the function of
the dichromate bleach used in black and white processing  is
to  dissolve  the  silver  image.   To  do  this, the bleach
formula contains no bromide and is very acidic.  As a result
the waste bleach contains silver.  Before  disposal  of  the
                          111-51

-------
dichromate  bleach,  silver  is  usually recovered.  This is
generally done by adding sodium chloride which  precipitates
the silver as silver chloride.

A  portion  of  the dichromate color bleach can be reused by
discharging approximately 50 percent of  the  used  solution
and  then  adding chemicals to restore its original strength
and volume.  As discussed in the section on product quality,
controls must be used to prevent dirt and unwanted  chemical
build-up.

Another  practice  that  is  used to reduce the waste bleach
load is to modify the normal replenishment system to one  of
"replenishment-by-demand."   During   the  color  dichromate
bleaching process, the bleach is  chemically  reduced.   The
amount  of  dichromate ion reduction per square foot of film
depends on the relative amounts of light and dark  areas  in
the  film  image.   By  adding  replenishment  chemicals "on
demand," only the amount of dichromate reduced is  replaced,
minimizing  waste.   Demand  is determined by monitoring the
bromide level.  Dichromate ion depletion is proportional  to
the  bromide  ion depletion.  Normal replenishment rates are
based on the maximum potential rate of dichromate  depletion
per  square  foot.   This  practice  commonly results in the
generation of some excess bleach which must be discharged.

Developer Regeneration

Developers  become  exhausted  both  by   loss   of   active
developing agents and by increase of reaction products.  The
limiting  factor  is  usually  the increased bromide concen-
tration.  Two approaches may be taken to  reuse  developers:
(1) the reaction products can be removed by a technique such
as  ion  exchange  so  that  the bulk of the solution may be
reused; or (2) specific chemicals can be separated from  the
bulk   of   the  solution  by  precipitation  or  extraction
techniques and the treated solution reused with  or  without
further  purification.  As an example, bromide and developer
decomposition products can be removed by ion  exchange  from
color  developers;  other  constituents  are  not  affected.
After passing through an ion exchange column, the  developer
is reconstituted and reused.
                          111-52

-------
 Currently,  only the ion exchange method is used on a limited
 basis  on some color paper developers.   Its applicability to
 other developers is yet to be determined.    Because  of  the
 complexity  of  the  developing solution and process,  proper
 control of chemical balance i-s  difficult   and  may  not  be
 possible in some cases.

 Water Conservation

 In  the  photoprocessing  industry,  the three major areas of
 plant water use occur in solution preparation,  water washing
 of film and paper,  and equipment cleanup.   Of  these  three!
 l£*h *arg?st  sinale  use  occurs in film  and paper washing!
 Methods  for  reduction  and  conservation  of   wash   water
 include:

     A.  Countercurrent washing
     B.  Squeegee use
     C.  Automatic wash water controls
     D.  Chemical prewash
     E.  Water recycle

     Countercurrent  Washing

 The   Countercurrent  wash  system referred  to here  is the use
 of a segmented wash tank after one  of   the  process  steps,
 usually  the final  wash after fix.   It  does not  refer  to the
 practice  of  pumping the same wash  water from one  wash   tank
 atter   a  process  step to another wash tank  after a different
 chemical  processing solution.   This  practice may   interfere
 with the process  chemistry.   In  the segmented  tank system,
 wash water  is  cascaded  progressively from one tank  segment
 to  the  next   against  the movement  of  the  film.   Fresh  wash
 water enters  the  last wash tank  segment  in  the   system,   and
 the  overflow  flows  to  each  preceding segment in succession.
 AS the  film or  paper moves forward,  it   progressively  comes
 into contact   with   cleaner   and  cleaner wash water.  It  is
 reported  to be  up to a  hundred   times  more   efficient   than
 deep-tank  washing.   The   net result is a  lower total water
 input to  remove chemical by-products from the film or paper.

 Countercurrent washing  is  not universally applicable to  all
process  machine configurations.  When used, proper  controls
                          111-53

-------
must be applied to prevent quality problems from  biological
growth, dirt accumulation, and inadequate washing.

    Squeegees

Squeegees are devices designed to remove the liquid from the
surfaces  of  film  and  paper as they move from one process
tank to another to  reduce  solution  carryover.   They  are
placed  at the exit of process solution and wash tanks where
such placement is compatible with the process chemicals  and
emulsion.   With  proper placement and adjustment, squeegees
conserve  raw   materials   and   reduce   water   use   and
replenishment   volume  {waste  effluent).   The  amount  of
carryover reduction varies depending on a number of  factors
including  squeegee  type, process material area and machine
speed,  but  typically  ranges  up  to  95  percent.    This
reduction in carryover can result in a significant reduction
of wash water.  For example, the recommended wash water rate
for  the C-41 process without squeegee use is 183 1/sq m and
with squeegee use is 91 1/sq m, a reduction of 50 percent.

Squeegee use is not universally applicable  to  all  process
machines,   chemistry,   or   products.   Proper  placement,
adjustment,  and  maintenance  are  extremely  important  to
prevent   physical   quality  problems  from  scratches  and
abrasions.

Among a wide variety of squeegee types, the most common  are
rubber  or  polyurethane wiper blades  (usually used in pairs
with the blades opposed to each other on opposite  sides  of
the  film or paper), air knives, Venturi, rotary buffer, and
soft rollers.  Wiper blades can have rigid mountings or,  as
more  recently  used,  they are attached to the machine with
plastic leaf springs which provide a constant self-adjusting
blade pressure on the film.  The air knife squeegee consists
of slits cut into two opposed tubes from which air  impinges
on  each  side of the material at an angle of 20° to 45° off
normal.  The Venturi squeegee also utilizes air   impingement
where the material effectively becomes one side of a Venturi
orifice.   The  rotary  buffer  consists of two opposed soft
felt rollers rotating  in opposition to the linear motion  of
the material.  Soft rollers are used in opposing pairs.  The
roller  has  an inner shaft covered with a soft polyurethane
                           111-54

-------
 foam,  which in turn is covered with a thin layer of  silicone
 rubber having a very smooth  surface.   Soft roller squeegees
 are  typically  used for  wide format  materials.   In  addition
 to their  squeegee action,  the rollers  aid  in  transporting
 the  material  through the  machine and allow self threading
 which,  in turn,  means no  leader is required.

     Automatic Wash Water  Controls

 Excessive  wash  water flows  can  be  avoided   simply   and
 effectively   by  the  installation  of  automatic   solenoid
 operated  shutoff devices  which completely stop the   flow  of
 water   into  the  processor   when   it  is not being  used.   A
 shutoff delay of a few minutes is  needed  so   that   time  is
 allowed   for  removal of   excessive  chemical   by-products
 carried  into  the  wash  water by   the  film.     Further
 efficiencies   can  be  accomplished  by  the  installation  of
 maximum flow  regulation valves which   prevent greater   flow
 than needed.

     Chemical  Pre-Wash

 After-fix   wash   water volume  can  be  reduced by  60 to  70
 percent with  the addition of  a salt bath between the fix and
 final wash.   The role of  the  salt  bath is to  remove  the  fix
 from the   emulsion   chemically at a  faster rate than can  be
 done by   washing.    The  salt  bath   provides   a  resultant
 reduction   in washing time and water  volume.  A  satisfactory
 bath of this  type is  a 20 grams per liter mixture of  sodium
 sulfate and sodium bisulfite  at a  pH  of 8 to  9.

     Water  Recycle

 Wash  water   recycle   has  the  potential  for a significant
 reduction   in a   plant's   water   use.    With   effective
 application,   along   with  other   in-process  controls, total
plant   process  water   use  has  been   observed   in   actual
applications   to  be   reduced   by  about  70  percent.   As
discussed  in  the  section on product quality, proper   quality
control  is   extremely  important when  recycling wash water
Wash water recycle is   not  necessarily   applicable   to  all
processes or  practical  in all plants because of product mix.
When  recycled  water   is  used,  the  current practice is to
                          111-55

-------
recycle the water to print processes and use fresh water for
processing of originals so that in case of control  problems
irreplaceable  originals  are not damaged.  Methods used for
preparation of the water for recycle include treatment  with
resin  ion exchange or reverse osmosis, which were described
previously in the  section  on  silver  recovery  from  wash
waters.

    Housekeeping

The   overall   effectiveness  of  most  of  the  previously
discussed in-process controls is greatly reduced if a  plant
does  not  have a commitment to good housekeeping practices.
The attendant results are a decreased economic  benefit  and
increased pollutant loads.

For   example,  silver  recovery  units  must  be  regularly
maintained  to  prevent  silver  loss.   The  effluent  from
metallic  replacement  units must be carefully monitored and
the units replaced when  exhausted.   The  unit  is  usually
considered   to   be  exhausted  when  the  effluent  silver
concentration is 1,000 mg/1 as  determined  by  the  use  of
silver  test  paper  or  chemical  analysis.   Care  must be
exercised in the operation of electrolytic units to  control
cell  current density to prevent sulfiding, if too high, and
the loss of silver, if too low.

Plumbing leaks and the use of  excess  chemicals  and  water
must  be  prevented  to reduce hydraulic and chemical loads.
The replenishment rate used should be the  minimum  required
for  proper  process  operation.  The replenishment and wash
water control valves should be calibrated  and  periodically
checked  for  proper flow rate.  Automatic control equipment
should be used for cut-off of replenishment and  wash  water
at  the  appropriate  time at the start and end of a product
run.  Squeegees should be used at every solution exit  where
possible and should be regularly checked  for proper squeegee
action.

END-OF-PIPE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES

End-of-pipe  treatment  is the treatment of wastewater from  a
process  just prior to discharge  for  the purpose of  reducing
                           111-56

-------
pollutant   loads   to  the  receiving stream.  Although  benefit
may be gained  from material recovery,  the primary purpose  is
pollutant reduction.  A   number  of  establishments   in  the
photographic   processing  industry  use  various  types   of
end-of-pipe treatments.

In many cases  the wastewaters  are   segregated  into  con-
centrated   chemical   wastes  and  wash water wastes and then
treatments  are applied to one or both  waste  streams.   The
size,  complexity,  and corresponding  costs of  the treatment
equipment may  be reduced  by separation of wastewaters.

Descriptions   of   the end-of-pipe  treatment   technologies
encountered in this industry follow.

Precipitation  involves   the reaction of two or more  soluble
chemicals to produce  an insoluble product.   This  technique
is  used  to reduce the amount of iron-cyanide  complex being
discharged by  treating waste fix containing the complex with
a flocculant and ferrous  sulfate as a reducing  agent.   This
results  in  the formation of insoluble ferrous ferrocyanide
which settles  with  the   aid  of  the  flocculant.    Sulfide
precipitation  is  also used in a proprietary process  for the
reduction of metals such  as silver, cadmium, lead, iron, and
zinc from photoprocessing wastewater.  Because  these  metals
exist  as  complexes, it  is necessary  in some cases to break
down the complex before   effective  precipitation  can  take
place.  This problem  has  been overcome by use of proprietary
chemical additions.

Precipitation  can  be  used for the reduction of  chromium.  As
used  in the electroplating industry, the amount of chromium
in the  wastewater  is  reduced  by  chemical  reduction  of
hexavalent   chromium   to   trivalent   chromium  and  then
precipitation  of the  chromium followed by  filtration.   The
precipitation  of  chromium involves the addition of  caustic
soda or lime to the wastewater to increase the pH  to  8-10.
This   decreases  the  solubility  of  the  chromium,  which
precipitates as the hydroxide.

Cadmium can be precipitated as the hydroxide  by  adjustment
of   pH.     Alkalinity  has  a  significant  effect  on  the
solubility of  cadmium.  The theoretical solubility values of
                          111-57

-------
cadmium hydroxide,  according to Pourbaix,  are  approximately
the following:

                                  Solubility,
              pH                  mq/1
               8                  3,000
               9                  30
              10                  0.03
              11                  0.003 (minimum)

The   insolubility   of   cadmium  carbonate  suggests  that
precipitations with soda ash may reduce soluble  cadmium  to
very   low    levels   in   effluent.   Since  many  combined
wastewaters contain some carbonate, it is very possible that
cadmium  carbonate  rather   than   cadmium   hydroxide   is
precipitated  when  wastewaters are neutralized with caustic
or lime.  Some reported values that seem unrealistically low
for hydroxide precipitation actually may be  achieved by this
mechanism.

Cadmium sulfide  is very insoluble  (solubility product,  K   =
10-z»),  so that a precipitation system based upon sulfides,
combined with efficient removal  of  dissolved  solids,  may
provide acceptable effluent.

Settling  involves the concentration of particulate matter  in
wastewater  by   collecting  the wastewater  in tanks or ponds
under quiescent  conditions  and allowing the  suspended matter
to settle with  time.  Waste streams in this  industry do  not
normally  contain large amounts of  suspended  solids; however,
settling  is  commonly used  in  conjunction with precipitation
to remove the resultant solids.  Settling was observed to  be
used    for    (1)   collection   of   precipitated    ferrous
ferrocyanide, (2) collection of precipitated metal sulfides,
 (3) reduction of suspended  solids  in  aerated wastewater, and
 (4) preliminary settling  of wastewater prior to  discharge  to
a POTW.

Ozonation  is  a treatment process   where ozone  is bubbled
 through the wastewater.   The wastewater  is  usually  collected
 in tanks  and  the ozone  added  through  sparging  tubes   in   the
 bottom  of   the  tank.   Sometimes  the wastewater is  cascaded
 through two or  more  tanks connected in  series.    The   ozone
                           111-58

-------
 provides   a  source  of  oxygen  for  oxidizable compounds  and is
 used  for  the  general   reduction   of   BOD  and   COD  in   the
 wastewater.     It    is  also  .used as  a  pretreatment   for
 wastewater that  is  to  be further  treated by aeration.  Plant
 7781  has  demonstrated  that  the  addition  of   ozone   prior   to
 aeration  enhances the  effectiveness of the  aeration process.

 Filtration  is  used  for  reduction  of  waterborne  suspended
 solids.   It  is accomplished by  passing the  wastewater  stream
 through solid  media such as retaining screens,  cloths    or
 papers  or  through particulate  media such as  sand, gravel,
 carbon, or diatomaceous earth using   gravity,   pressure    or
 vacuum  as the driving force.   The filter equipment includes
 plate and frame  presses,  cartridges,  and sand or mixed media
 beds.   Filtration   is  employed   to   dewater    precipitated
 ferrous   ferrocyanide  and metal sulfides and as  a wastewater
 preconditioner prior to treatment by  ion exchange or reverse
 osmosis.   Diatomaceous  earth   filtration  is   used in   the
 electroplating  industry for   reducing   the amount   of  the
 previously precipitated chromium  hydroxide   in   the treated
 wastewater.

 Clarification  is a  unit operation for reduction  of  suspended
 solids.    A  clarifier  is  a   tank   with  internal baffles,
 compartments,  sweeps,  and other   directing   and  segregating
 mechanisms  to  separate the   solids from  the  liquids.   The
 solids are contained in  the  underflow,  and   the  overflow
 consists   of   wastewater  with  reduced   solids.    Often  the
 underflow, having a  high  solid  content,  is  sent  to  a   second
 clarifier  or  sent  directly to  a  centrifuge or  filter  device
 for further  concentration to sludge   or   cake  solids     One
 facility   was  observed  to  use   the clarifier  as   both a
 reaction   vessel  to   precipitate ferrocyanide  and   as   a
 clarifier  to settle  the  precipitate from  the liquid.

 Aeration   involves   the   treatment of  wastewater with  air to
 cause the  reduction  of  oxygen demand.   This  is commonly done
 in ponds or  large tanks.  The aeration action is enhanced by
pumping the  wastewater   into  the  air   as  a  fountain  or
bubbling air through the water by means of  sparging tubes in
 the  bottom  of  the  pond.    Aeration   is  used to a limited
extent in  the Photographic Processing  Industry for reduction
of BOD and COD.
                          111-59

-------
Neutralization involves the adjustment of the pH of a  waste
stream  with  acid  or  alkali  to  produce  a  near neutral
condition.  The  most  common  method  is  to  treat  acidic
streams  with  alkaline  materials  such as limestone, lime,
soda ash, or sodium hydroxide.  Alkaline streams are treated
with acids such as sulfuric.   There  is  no  particular  pH
control  problem  in  the  industry.  For example, developer
wastes are alkaline and stop and fix wastes are  acid.   The
combined wastes are often nearly neutral.  Neutralization is
employed at one plant to adjust the pH of wash water treated
by reverse osmosis prior to discharge to a POTW.

Equalization  involves the collection of wastewater in tanks
or ponds for the purpose of equalizing  or  controlling  the
flow quantities prior to discharge or other treatment steps.
Equalization  is  necessary  and  practiced prior to reverse
osmosis.

Chlorination involves the addition  of  chlorine  gas  or   a
hypochlorite  salt  to  the wastewater to cause breakdown of
certain  compounds by oxidation.  It is used in the  industry
to  reduce  chlorine  demand   loads   in cooperation with the
local POTW and for control of  slime organisms.  It can  also
be used  for odor abatement or  as a specific reactant.

Flocculation is used to cause  or accelerate the settling and
concentration  of  suspended   solids.   Solids  often settle
slowly,  or not at all, because of small size  and  electrical
charge.   Addition  of  flocculants   such  as alum,  ferric
chloride, and polymeric electrolytes  promotes coagulation of
particles and  gives  faster   settling  rates and   improved
separation.   This process  is  used  as an aid  in the settling
of precipitated iron-cyanide  complexes.

Reverse  Osmosis is  a  physical  separation   technique  that
involves a wastewater stream passing under pressure  through
a membrane.  Water passes  through the membrane   as   product
(permeate)  and  the  pollutants  remain   upstream   from  the
membrane as concentrate.   Reverse osmosis   is  used   in   the
industry to reduce pollutants in the relatively  dilute wash
water  wastes.   This  reduction  of  pollutants   allows   the
recycle  of  the permeate and is practiced at several  plants.
                           111-60

-------
Evaporation  is a technique that  is used to reduce the volume
of  a  wastewater  stream.   The one plant using this system
recycled most of the processing  chemicals and wash water   to
reduce  the  hydraulic load input to the evaporation system.
The evaporation system consists  of two stages of evaporation
in  a  spray  film  evaporator   with  a  third   and   final
evaporation  stage  in  a  hot   oil  wiper  film evaporator.
Thermal energy is  conserved  by  pre-heating  the  incoming
water  by directing it through the condensation tubes in the
first evaporator and by storage  of  the  wastewater  between
stages  in thermally insulated tanks.  The solids content  of
the wastewater is concentrated from 2 to 65 percent  in  the
first  two  evaporation  stages.  The sludge remaining after
the third stage of evaporation is about 85  percent  solids.
The  evaporated  water is condensed, purified, and reused  in
the  process  as  wash  water.   The  purification  process,
consisting  of  ion exchange, is necessary to remove ammonia
compounds.

Chemical  Reduction  of  Hexavalent  Chromium   -   Chemical
reduction  is  used  for  the treatment of wastewater by the
electroplating industry  for  the  reduction  of  hexavalent
chromium  to  trivalent chromium.  The reduction enables the
trivalent chromium to be separated from solution by alkaline
precipitation followed by diatomaceous earth filtration.

Reduction is a  chemical  reaction  in  which  one  or  more
electrons are transferred to the chemical being reduced from
the  reducing  agent.  Hexavalent chromium (CrVI) is usually
reduced to trivalent chromium at a pH of 2 to 3 with  sulfur
dioxide  (S02)f  sodium  bisulfite, other sulfite-containing
compounds, or ferrous sulfate.  The reduction makes possible
the removal of chromium as  the  trivalent  hydroxide  which
precipitates  under  alkaline conditions.  Typical reactions
for 302 reduction are:

         S02 + H20 = H2S03

         2H2Cr04 + 3H2S03 = Cr2  (S04)3 + 5H20

Representative  reactions  for   reduction   of   hexavalent
chromium  under  acid  conditions  using  sulfite  chemicals
instead of S02 are:
                          111-61

-------
    (a)   sodium metabisulfite with sulfuric acid:

         4H2Cr04 + 3Na2S205 + 3H2S04 = 3Na2S04 + 2Cr2(S04}3
              + 7H20

    (b)   sodium bisulfite with sulfuric acid:

         4H2Cr04 + 6NaHS03 + 3H2S04 = 3Na2S04  + 2Cr2(S04)3
              + 10HZ0

    (c)   sodium sulfite with sulfuric acid:

         2H2Cr04 + 3NazS03 + 3H2SO4 = 3NazS04  + Cr2(S04}3
              + 5H20

Reduction using sulfur  dioxide  is  the  most  widely  used
method  in the metal finishing segment of the electroplating
industry, especially with larger installations.  The overall
reduction  is  readily  controlled  by  automatic   pH   and
oxidation-reduction potential instruments.  Treatment can be
carried out on either a continuous or batch basis.

Hexavalent chromium is also reduced to trivalent chromium in
an   alkaline   environment  using  sodium  hydrosulfite  as
follows:

    2H2Cr04 + 3Na2S204 + 6NaOH = 6Na2S03 + 2Cr(OH)3 + 2H20

Data from the specific plants employing  these  technologies
are  presented  in  Section  V  and  their  effectiveness is
discussed in Section VII.

INDUSTRY CHARACTERISTICS

Information on  the general characteristics of plants  in  the
photographic  processing   industry has been collected in two
industry surveys.  The first, performed by the  Eastman Kodak
Company  during   the  period  1969  through   1974,  contains
information  on   237 plants.  The results  of  this survey are
summarized in Table III-4.  Within a given  category,  e.g.,
method  of waste  disposal, the parts may add  up to more than
100 percent.  This is because in many  cases   more  than  one
method of disposal may be  used in a given  plant.  The totals
                           111-62

-------
for  each category do not necessarily equal 237 because some
plants  were  unresponsive   for   some   categories.    The
information  included  in . this  survey  was  collected from
plants which had requested information from Kodak  on  waste
disposal  or  effluent  calculations.  It is recognized that
the information included in Table III-4  is  six  to  eleven
years  old.   Many  of the processes in use at that time are
obsolete, and it is likely that many of the individual plant
characteristics  have  changed  over   this   time   period.
Nevertheless,  the data were valid at the time of the survey
and can serve as a reference point for comparison  with  the
more current information which follows.

A  more recent survey conducted by EPA in the spring of 1977
is  summarized  in  the  following  tables.    Table   II1-5
correlates  production  and  water  use with the plant type,
arranged by SIC code.  SIC codes were not directly addressed
in the telephone survey, rather the plant representative was
asked  what  kind  of  customer  the  plant  served.    This
information  was used to place the plant in a SIC code using
best available judgment.  Tables III-6 to  111-15  correlate
various plant characteristics with production cate9ories.

The  139  plants  in this survey were contacted by telephone
and asked  questions  according  to  a  fixed  format.   The
answers  were  recorded  on a Telephone Survey Form, a blank
sample copy of which is included in Appendix  A.   Prior  to
contacting  the  plant,  a  letter  was  sent  to  the plant
explaining the purposes  of  the  EPA  program,  and  giving
notification  that  they  would  be  called  and the type of
information that would be requested.   The  list  of  plants
contacted  was  compiled from trade magazine advertisements,
membership   directory   of   the   Photographic   Marketing
Association  (PMA),  information  supplied  by  the National
Association of Photographic Manufacturers  (NAPM),  previous
surveys,  and personal contacts.  The methods used to obtain
plant lists tended to bias the selected plant sample towards
relatively large plants [production greater  than  93  sq  m
(1,000  sq  ft)  per day].  The information available at the
time on the identity of the almost 10,000 smaller plants was
insufficient for the selection of a  random  sample  of  the
entire industry.
                          111-63

-------
I
           o o   o o
                           (M {Nl rH (T)
      —   in m
      co    •  *
      (N   fl VO
                           of af> aft of
A >
                                                        in m


                                                        m TT
                       —  r-i-(^rr-
>
1 (rt
§\
"3 ,-,
CT1 p^.
fN
Q O »_»
5-3 1
-*
r-
r-i
CN
*— *

g
3
m • • co • • • • c-i
OT vocx r- r1- r** tn fi m r» r^ trie
•— • co — r- CN •— *3*

— ^- rH m
in 01 • • —.
i>j TJCO oco oj o ci ^r (— * m oc
	 CO • — LT> rj- — C"4

*
^-H ^J ;fl ^3 j3 ^-* ^J ^fl C'A> OP -^^ "fl ov
•^ ^H IT! ^ tNCOOCOr-
-i . . o • • r~-
04 \ar^ co
S
1
O
4J 4-1
§3
- -- - „ t-1
0) -H a c .3 r^
3^ u M 3 3 >< o <;
^jgJS.3)cirl "" rt
j^5jJiT35iO J2
O CO G *— * 4J Q O-H £y
y] 3 ^ Vj O 2 ^ 4J 3 CJ
^a.gS'^1 3 OP-H x d
i n3 U ai -HO u-<
4J-r-t(l)-r>4J ££. --\ \J ZJ i-H
yotjc-H 3 ^VH, " 3l]
V4caEi J -3or;G 5 ^c
•H 3 lj C >-< SJi-l-JO i-3 dlf
dSS- O M S-iJOZ 23 & C
• . in
(NO f*l O O

OP tn3 JP o*

^^,
O O ^3" O O
TJ> ^r — in in


^a HP if s.j
in in --.
. . tN
•w cvi r- in in
T — oo ^H





3
•H

-------



























V
g
I
i

M
...
a
fN


C >,
















01
s
d
S

^

.3
S
*™H
ft
14-1
0
la
,J3
1
.2
a
2 JO
O "O
^R
^D O"1
CO
04

^,
^* rtj
^^ 'Q
8 °- H"
o S g

OP OP c^ c^ OP OP OP OP
^m^
CN -^-^ '—^ »-— *
rH O O lO O O rH O-O M O O
— O— O~— O— O
rH rH rH rH




OPOP OPOP OPOP OPdP
^- ^-. ^-- — in in
CO ro ^* f*l • •
C^J ^VO OJ ^ir^ rH VO^1 rH rHCO
— is in -~ rH co — co r-» — ^o fo

o
OS?
O —
in
§1
^ nJ

5*3 JS 3* OH Cf> i*> s,* J?
, — .intn— -- - 1^1 r~- ^— in in
^ »*v^ co ""r* ••
LO corH ^* mp^ oj ^*in CN ^"in
rHCO — rHCO — ^Df^ — 'S-in



o ,-.
o cS

A Js
o <
0.4
>^
0^ f^*
as51
a<° sT
S^f-l irt


OPOP OPdt> OPOP dPOP
-^ rH en ^- in 1/1 — . ^~.
CO**ON ••r^ c^
f^t 1/1 ^» r^ oj {*** fo LD in Ti* r*** f*}
•~ en*— CS'-^'-OM — CN^

OP00 OPdP OPOP OPdP
— . *~. in m — .
o r-i — • * in
N oo 01 min co r^M I-H oo
i-l


OP oP cP OP
--. vo ^- in in
c*t • * * *
04 ^1* ^D ^* ^*
~— in ro




OP OP OP OP
^— » r** *^i
r- • •
(N o 1^1 
~- in fn



OP OP «« IP
*-. ^ 04 in r-
tN ....
[/]
01
0)

5
OP oP dP OP C
^-, ID ^r S
0 t-t
ff> vo o^ ^" <3 'O
— rH t- ft
.5
8
OP OP OP OP -H
^^ m in w
^O • » £
CM CO r-H O O H
— CO rH
Ul
•H

C^

-------






























in
i
H
IH
IH

a
1






1
o
&
m


^*
^
*
(P CO
CO
D
^ H CN
D 3
pi nj

m CM ^ CN
CM rH


O O CN rH


O CO O O


CM 00 CN rH

ro in CM o

O \O 00 O
§
2

Q
3


tJ HH ^*
tH t^ ^J
t-i rf* .p
fj §J O
b g EH

in CM ^ CM
CN rH


SS
2
*H
EH S
H^
«^ ^_

3
H CO *
ye gco
K O "J
EM ^r* fl
U3 5J 3 CN
E >T1
0 CN O rH

rH CN O rH


CN oo m o


rH CM rH O
rH 00 O O
H rH
*
*
rH in CN in OO CM
00 CO

S a
•H
MH
CN CM O O rH rH

P ^
^ ^5
Oi <— ' i~l
Q QJ
Q _ U o m
CT\ CM O O T O

OO pi ^j C)
r-\ CJ CL O *
Goo
O O O fll
00 in O rH CM O
*3" rH
m CM o rn rH .H
•H rH
I-- <» CM iH O O

O^ O O1 -> rH «
f- O CTt O -H
* CTi O C
rH ^rH S
CM sj c °^ n 5 ^
t
13
en co o o o o

01 co o o ^* iH

m «
§
rH
CN Cft
CO
r- m o rH CM o
^T rH
rH
00
r^ C
>i ra
(O JZ
VO CO O CO CM O
O rH CM rH O rH
rH rH
co 'D -P
rH .
p^j p>^ J_( £j
tO >i fe Q) 3
^" "O JO 'U & -P
TT . 'O . (0
8
8
  -3

  1
                         (0
                         •C!
                         a
&
Vi
A
        flfl
  -P    -H -H
•H -H fO O H
CM rd ro H 4-1
CN u ro r  •
i> 4J r-* 1


a^ y§i
CO    W
li
                              in
                              ot
                              u

                              w
                     M
                     P
         -3
          en
          (0
                                       S
                                    -H
                                   p
                                   S-
                                          en
                               u
                               H
                               CO
                           to

                          1
                                                     W   H -P     (D 1-1

                                                     asa1"     &&
                                                       f-^   cr        •• J-( C
   rH rH CO & 3


    II II  II  II II


   rH CM CO ^3* in
                                                                 cu


                                                                 o
                               111-66

-------
























vo
1
H
H
S3





























H
EH
1
g
a
1
w



03
eu

S
S
Q
CM

W
D
«
1
B
H
&
H
Q
S
CL,
fr
0
§
g
irf
i_j
H
s
ft
8














!
iH
&
O
DI
Q)
•P
6

(1)
w
O
-P

*







i
o
EH
O C
0 '&
-i ^
£ O
S c

§
58
o
Bo
•9 °
o
jj
o
0 O
0 0
o -

0 O
H fH

O
4J
O CT>
O O%
O &\
rH C^

O
to o
W O
d) ^
,T _J
r—l • •



fc
>1
&
S
(0
 O CN
rH rH



a\ ro rs o o
rH





£
5
•H
o O1
o o o
o  o o -P
o 
-------
r-
 I
H
H
H
   CO
   O
   M
   IS
   M
   8
            to
  0)  rH
M!  §
O (0  0J
slls
   W^ 1
   S
  lj Lj


  sss
        rH OlrH
        sis
          -\J I—1
          §6
          •ga
          «l
     l
ss1
        in  r*  co \&  m
        m  rH  in rH  rH
                  O O
              o  o r^ o o
        vo  in  CM o  oj
        rH
                       o
              o    o o
              o  o\ o o
              o  o^ o  *>
                  a\  * o
              rH   - O CM
        q  q
                  00
               01  O  O
               W  0  O
                  -H m
        {n
        t-1
                               o\
                               en
              n  r- r» m vo    VD
              rH    fO rH       P-
              in  in M rH  vol    o>
                    n
                    CM
                        to
                        3
          111-68

-------
00   P-I
 i   0
I	I   *-^

H   Q
H   Q
«
1
in
ro
r-
rH
CO
in
UD
•H
fO
.-1
             11 s
             y i—1 *•

               S QJ
             o? n
             a m Oi
1
  eu
  -3
0) 01
 • w
               3 _Lj




               CU W
       CM
      O
      O
      o
       Ul
                               ro
                         
-------
                  TABLE HI-9
CORRELfiTICN OF REPLENISHMENT USE WITH PRODUCTION
       FRCM TRTJgPHTMR SURVEY INPOFMftTICN
Producticn,
sq ft/day
Less than 1,000
1,000 to 2,999
3,000 to 20,000
More than 20,000
Unknown
Totals
Used
32
15
57
16
13
133
Not used
3
2
1
0
0
6
Totals
35
17
58
16
13
139
                      111-70

-------
              TABLE 111-10
(XJKREMTION OF SQUEEGEE USE WITH PBODUCTICN
   FPCM TEIEPHCNE SURVEY INFORMATION
Production, Everywhere
sq ft/day Reconroended
Less than 1,000
1,000 to 2,999
3,000 to 20,000
More than 20,000
Unknown
Totals
11
10
52
16
12
101
Partial
9
3
3
0
1
16
Not Used
15
4
3
0
0
22
Totals
35
17
58
16
13
139
                  111-71

-------
                            TABLE III-ll
          CORRELATION OF SILVER RECOVERY USE WTTH PROEUCTION
                  FROM TELEPHONE SURVEY INFORMATION
Production,
sq ft/day
Less than 1,000
1,000 to 2,999
3,000 to 20,000
tfore than 20,000
Unknown
From All Fix
Solution
Overflows
27
16
57
16
13
From
Portion of
Overflows
2
1
1
0
0
Not Used
6
0
0
0
0
Totals
35
17
58
16
13
Totals
129
                                                                 139
                                 111-72

-------
7   8
a   a-
I   s

Ws-   T  _  SK
•<-t fl)    O  C  Oi*-.
•H O (J H  O  C C
rd * £> -H *-"  a -H
<8 iH \ U   £ W
4J Q^T) Q) 73  O fl>
jB aj c fH  c  x a
S fi ra id  3 H —
       5

       3 c    '.d
          S3    >i
          E    >-^
        oj JM    p


          5iH    CJ
          QiTJ Q)
        0 JU  fi A
                           So
                           I	1 W
                           H (0
                           10 i-l

                           •P &J
                                        O    O    O   O
                                   O    O    O   CM   O
                            111-73

-------
    I—I

    B
    ft
m  O
rH  H

H  a;
H  ffi
a
I

    g
    8
                         U
   •-' —
   CQ 'o

   O S
                   D     OJ

                   w     -H    i-i
                                        ro
                              vo    in
                             o   c >    ro
                                        CN
                              VD    O   CN
                                                           O
                              in
                                               o    CN
                                                           CN
                              co
                                          oo
                              o
                              o
                              o
                 G\
                 cn
                 
-------
      in  r-  o  r-   r^  r-j
      O   O  ft   f\   O  \D
      n  ^  r>   r-
      O   O  O  
-------
    §  §
    CM  H
    Q  S
in   O  H
^n   tn


H
       w
    H

    Q
                          01
                     i i  r-1


                     It!
                          SfO
                          as
                  en
a
                        Q
                        ffl
                             in  r-  oo
                                  O   rH
              O   O   O   O
                              rH   O
                                              rH   ^T
                              O   O
                              M   rH   CM
                                              o   r~-
a\
CM
O
o
o
c
VI
n
rH
o^
o*^
CM
S
o
o
o
ro
in
o
o
o
o
CM
5
O
o
o o
rH f-H
O
O
O
O
CM
0) C
^ -3
CO
rH
0]
rH
1
                                      CO
                             111-76

-------
                         SECTION  IV


                   INDUSTRY CATEGORIZATION
 INTRODUCTION
The purpose  of   industry  categorization   is  to  establish
subcategory  groupings for pollution control purposes within
the photographic  processing  industry such that plants within
each group have an equal ability  to  meet  the  established
effluent  limitations  guidelines.   Upon examination of the
various categorization bases  it  was  determined  that  this
industry  should  be  considered  as  a  single  group.  The
following subsection describes the considerations for making
this determination.

CATEGORIZATION BASIS

After considering the nature  of the various segments of  the
photographic   processing    industry   and   the  operations
performed therein, the following factors were considered  as
bases for subcategorization:

    1.   Process  type
    2.   Service performed or customer type
    3.   Type and quantity of material processed
    4.   Age of facility and  number of employees
    5.   Geographic location
    6.   Water use
    7.   Effluent discharge destination

Process Type

Since the processes performed in a plant are the sources  of
wastes  from  a plant, the photographic processes would seem
to be a natural candidate for subdividing the industry.   As
described  in  Section  III,  there  are a number of process
types used.

Many of the plants surveyed use multiple process  types  for
processing  a  mixture of photographic materials.  The mixed
wastes from these plants tend to  blend  any  distinguishing
process characteristics.   There are,  of course,  plants where
                           IV-1

-------
wastes  do  not  contain  all of the pollutant parameters of
concern because only one process type is used or the process
blend is such that one or more of the  waste  parameters  of
concern is omitted.  For example, a black and white negative
only  plant  does  not use bleach, and a color negative only
plant typically does  not  use  ferricyanide  or  dichromate
bleach.    (The   color   negative   process,   MC-42,  uses
ferricyanide  bleach,  but  observations  during  the  study
showed a tendency for color negative and print plants to use
the C-41 process which uses a ferric EDTA bleach.  The MC-42
process  is more likely to be used in plants having a mix of
reversal processes  and  use  a  house  ferricyanide  bleach
system.)  As a result, total cyanide and chromium pollutants
are  not  added to the wastewater and these plants will have
no difficulty in meeting any limitation on  these  pollutant
parameters.   Therefore,  the presence or absence of certain
process types is not a basis for subcategorization.

Service Performed or Customer Type

The service performed or customer type determines the  types
of  materials to be processed which, in turn, determines the
processes utilized.  Therefore, the above  discussion  about
process type is also applicable to the service performed.

Type and Quantity of Material Processed

Some  distinguishing process characteristics for the various
material types are shown in Table IV-1.
                            IV-2

-------
                         TABLE IV-1
     Distinguishing Process Characteristics of Various
                       Material Types
Material Type

Black and White
 Negative
 Reversal
Color Film
 Negative

 Reversal

 Negative, movie
 Negative, movie print
Color Paper
 Negative
/'Reversal
                        Processing Characteristics
                        No bleach
                        Dichromate bleach, waste bleach
                         contains silver
                        High silver, ferricyanide or EDTA
                         bleach
                        High silver, ferricyanide, EDTA, or
                         ferric chloride bleach
                        High silver, ferricyanide bleach
                        Low silver, dichromate or
                         ferricyanide bleach
                        Low silver,
                        Low silver,
EDTA bleach
EDTA bleach
As indicated, some of the materials have a  relatively  high
or  low amount of silver in the emulsion that is potentially
released to the wastewater.  Generally, most plants  process
a  mixture  of  materials which tend to produce an amount of
silver in the effluent per production unit that  is  in  the
mid-range  of  silver  that  would  come  from film or paper
alone.  For example, it is common for  a  plant  to  process
both  film  {high  silver)  and  paper (low silver).  Even a
movie film plant which processes all film  is  analogous  to
the   common  film-paper  plant  in  that  the  movie  plant
processes both high silver content negatives and low  silver
print  film.   A  plant  which processes only reversal films
will have a relatively high  silver  load  prior  to  silver
            Silver recovery processes are generally operated
            silver  concentrations  to   comparable   levels
             of   the  silver  concentration  before  silver
           So, assuming similar hydraulic loads, a  reversal
recovery
to  reduce
regardless
recovery
only  plant  would  potentially  have effluent silver levels
equivalent to those of other types of plants.
                           IV-3

-------
The bleach characteristics in  Table  IV-1  are  related  to
process  type; therefore, the discussion on process types is
applicable.

Production normalized quantities of process water and silver
in the effluent versus the quantity  of  material  processed
(production)   are   shown   in   Figures   IV-1  and  IV-2,
respectively, for the plants  studied.   The  plants  having
end-of-pipe treatments are identified in Figure IV-2.

The  water  use plot indicates no strong dependency of water
use with production, and the  plot  of  silver  load  versus
production  shows  a  general downward trend of lower silver
with increased production.  However,  when  considering  the
grouping  of  plants  with  similar  silver  treatment,  the
grouped  silver  quantities  are  generally  independent  of
production.   The  downward trend is most likely a result of
increased silver  treatment  rather  than  a  dependency  on
production.    Water  use  may  be  higher  in  plants  with
production of less than 93 sq m/day (1,000 sq ft/day) due to
inefficiencies of operation and the use  of  less  efficient
(in terms of water use) process equipment, but the available
information  is  insufficient  to  make  this determination.
Therefore,  based  on   available   information,   processed
material   quantity   is   not   a  suitable  parameter  for
subcategorization.

Age of Facility

Production normalized quantities  of  process  water  versus
plant  age  and  silver  in the effluent versus plant age are
shown in Figures IV-3 and IV-4, respectively, for the plants
studied.    No   particular   relationship   between   these
parameters   is  shown,  and  therefore  plant  age   is not  a
suitable basis for subcategorization.

Number of Employees

Production normalized quantities  of  process  water  versus
number of employees and silver in the effluent versus number
of   employees   are   shown   in   Figures  IV-5  and   IV-6,
respectively,  for  the  plants  studied.    No   particular
relationship   between   these   parameters  is   shown,  and
therefore number of employees  is not  a  suitable  basis  for
subcategor i zat ion.
                            IV-4

-------
             0
   © ©.
         ©

         O
          ©
           G
©
      O©

        ®
      0  <$>  0
     G
            ©
        0
                   e

                   o
                      ©
          ©
                  IV-5

-------
UJ  O 1 t
«=  •* i *

*  = z I
HI  Ik £ P
>  iu ^. o
si  X o z
•»  £ ac w
v>  w K fa
<  » 5 «
X  £ u. E

^-  K "? I-


-------
                                             <
                                             0
       i-S
                                                          -S
                                             o
               0
                                       0    0
                                        00
                                        0
                                      0
                       0
0

 0
           (9  OP
           <  U.
                                                                 (C
                                                                 3
                                                                 (9
3          8          S          8
w          »          3          N
  •"•* oooi/saazn oooi 'uaivw ssaooud
                        IV-7

-------
                                         <
                                         Or'
                       O
                                    00
                                     ©
                                            -s
<"»• 000t/fe| M.N31NO3 « 3AT IS
     IV-8

-------
                                    .-§
                                     -I
                                 o
                                    -8
    'UU.VMSS33OIU
IV-9

-------
                                            -8   =
                                       
-------
 Geographic  Location

 Geographic   location   is   not  a  basis  for  subcategorization.
 Photographic processes are  not   affected   by   the   physical
 location  of  the  facility.   The  price  or availability  of
 water may affect the  amount  of   modification   to  procedures
 used  in each plant.   However,  procedural changes  to  conserve
 water  can  affect  the concentration of pollutants discharged
 but not the amount or characteristics  of   the   constituents.
 The  waste  treatment  procedures  described  in Section III can
 be utilized in any geographical  area.  In   the event  of  a
 limitation   in    the  availability   of   land  space  for
 constructing a waste  treatment facility,  the  in-process
 controls and wash  water conservation techniques described  in
 Section  III   can  be  adopted   to  minimize   the land space
 required for the end-of-process  treatment  facility.   Often,
 a  compact   package   unit  can   easily handle  end-of-process
 waste,  if   good   in-process   techniques   are   utilized    to
 conserve raw materials and water.

 Water Use

 As  previously shown  in  Figure IV-1, no strong dependency
 exists between water  use and plant  size   in   terms  of  the
 quantity  of   material  processed.   It is expected  that the
 relative amount of water used by very  small   plants,  less
 than  93 sq m/day  (1,000 sq  ft/day), will  be larger  than the
 industry norm  due  to inefficiencies  of  operation.   For
 example,  when production  is low, process  machines may be  on
 stand-by for long periods  during which time  there   is  some
 wash  water  flow.  Small processors commonly use manual tray
 processing  and low volume  production sheet  film  and  paper
 processors   which are inherently less efficient in water use
 than large  continuous process machines.  The available  data
 are  insufficient  to quantify  the water  use  for these very
 small plants.  For the size of plants represented in  Figure
 IV-1, there  is no basis for subcategorization.

 Effluent Discharge Destination

Of   the   approximately   11,000   photographic  processing
dischargers,   fewer   than  20  are  direct  dischargers   as
determined by  an NPDES permit search.   The fact that a plant
 is  a  direct  discharger  has   no  effect  on  the  type of
pollutants discharged.   Direct  dischargers  may  currently
                           IV-11

-------
have   more   stringent   limitations   because   of  permit
requirements.  As a  result,   they  may  have  applied  more
effective  controls  and thus have smaller pollutant amounts
than those which discharge to POTWs.  The available data are
insufficient to make this determination.

SELECTION OF PRODUCTION RELATED PARAMETER

In  the  selection  of  a  suitable  production  normalizing
parameter,  a  number  of  production  related  factors were
considered.   The  level  of  production   activity   in   a
particular plant can be expressed as the processed area, raw
materials consumed, number of process machines, or number of
employees.

All  of  these parameters have some relation to the level of
production in a particular plant, but area processed is more
closely associated with the level of  activity  relative  to
pollutant  discharge  than  the  other  parameters  for  the
photographic industry.  Raw material  consumed  is  directly
related  to  area  processed  but  with  the  area being the
primary factor.  The number of process machines  is  related
to  the  area processed but varies depending upon the degree
of utilization of each machine in a particular  plant.   The
number  of  employees is an unreliable measure of production
because of a varying degree of automation,  particularly  in
the  smaller . facilities.   Therefore,  the area of emulsion
processed  was  selected  as  the   production   normalizing
parameter.
                           IV-12

-------
                          SECTION  V

                PROCESS WASTE  CHARACTERIZATION
DATA BASE
The   initial  EPA  study  of   the   Photographic   Processing
Industry  was  conducted  during the period mid-1974  through
mid-1976 and included a Kodak  "200  plant"  survey  and   the
collection  of data and sampling of three plants  in the  fall
of 1974.  In the spring of  1976 the National Association of
Photographic   Manufacturers   (NAPM)  conducted   a  sampling
effort of 37 plants.  An expanded EPA effort  was  initiated
in the fall of 1976 for the-purpose of collecting additional
information.   This  second  EPA study began in October  1976
with  the sampling  of  two  plants.   Then  information   was
obtained  from  139  plants  in a telephone survey which was
described in Section III.  A formal  request  for  data   was
made  to  those  plants which  indicated during the telephone
survey that  they  had  available  self-monitoring  data on
wastewater  characteristics.   A total of 19 plants submitted
some  information based on this  request.   From   information
gathered   in  the  telephone  survey,  twenty  plants   were
selected and visited.  Detailed engineering information   was
obtained  on  the  process  water  use, in-process controls,
end-of-pipe treatments and wastewater characteristics.    The
factors considered during the  selection process were product
mix,    in-process  controls,   end-of-pipe  treatments,   size
(production) and data availability.  .  Primary  consideration
was   given   to  the  use  of  end-of-pipe  treatments   and
in-process controls.   Five of  the  20  plants  visited   were
selected  for sampling by EPA.   Selection factors considered
were  product  mix,  in-process  controls  and   end-of-pipe
treatments.    The sampling of these plants took place in  the
summer of 1977.   A summary of these data  sources  is  aiven
below:
                            V-l

-------
Information Source
and Type  	__
                                Number
                                of  Plants
1969-1974 Kodak "200 Plant"
 Survey
1974 - EPA Engineering Plant
 Visit and Sampling
       NAPM Sampling
       EPA Sampling
       EPA Telephone Survey
       EPA Engineering Plant
1976 -
1976 -
1976 -
1976 -
 Visit
1977 -
1976 -
       EPA Sampling
       Self-monitoring
data
 submitted to EPA on request
237

  3
 37
  2
139

 20
  5

 17
Note  that  some  plants  in  each  source  category  may be
included in another category.  For example, some of  the  37
plants  in the NAPM sampling effort were also covered in the
139 plant telephone survey.

Section V contains data for  76  plants  obtained  from  the
described  sources  of information.  Four digit number codes
are used to represent  each  of  the  studied  plants.   The
series  of  numbers 02nn have been assigned to the 37 plants
included in the 1976 NAPM sampling effort.   The  data  have
been condensed  (by averaging) and abridged.  Table V-l lists
the  plants  studied  by  plant  code and gives some general
characteristics of their customer type, SIC  code,  relative
size,  and  production.  The production information is given
in terms of percent film production, percent black and white
production,  and  the   percentage   of   color   production
attributed to the several bleach types.

Sampling Efforts

EPA  conducted  waste stream sampling efforts  in  the fall  of
 1974 and  1976 and in the summer of  1977.  A major portion  of
the  1977 effort was devoted  to the  sampling and  analyses for
priority  pollutants.   The   collected    effluent   samples
consisted  of   flow  proportioned   composites   taken   during
single process  days  in  the  1974 and 1976   sampling  efforts.
Flow  proportioned   composites  were taken  for each of three
days at each  site during the 1977  sampling  effort  with   the
exception of  plants  2714 and 9026.   No  effluent  samples  were
                             V-2

-------



















i
i w

SO
in
1 B

g
0-





















il|
^ o p
5>-rf £
<£ Q Cu



g -
H _o
COO
u u r»
fl) O fi




«
|S
"c o1 o
Q) -H 3
M V4 p
££0,
g
-1,1 jj
C O
83
%, 'B
i-i rt o
£-H 1-1
WH C [i

s
•H

e
•O O
0) Ai D
o tJ '6
& m c-



..
N
•H



U
H
U)

l^

03 &
O [?
3^ ^j
X
a. o
OOOOOO O8OOO OOOOO OOOOK





cfim^o oo o\ o o o
C* »OOO8 88OO8 8{Ti OB O 8 B B 6
pH i— 1 ^H ^H rH








"
•-• ini~ioo <-Hinooa 01-1000 oi-tOiH(N


M

in TT o


s
-H
s
D
1
OCOOOOB BBOOO KOOOK OKSSe "*
^-(
3
IM
O

jj
UCOU<<< U U £C < U < ffi < < CQ < U < U CO =
v v v v g
i-l
a
minr*i min mcriininin in i— i in in inminmin ..

f*} f~J fO t ro co f*} GO f*^ fl f^ ro C*J f^ C^> t f""i fo f*^ ro ro H
r~-r~-r~- r~-p~- r~r~-[*-r~-r~- r~-r~-r^f~~ r--ri-r^-t~-r~- ™
n
ft
5
S i
c ft b u & a
0) H 3 r-( U C S
5 X ainjojS4-ifl)
-H -, -P -H g P -H -H
ci F? ronE?^n>
4, i |«BSS£
g B ' iJ-i^J.
BE 3 Q Q td O
5, S Q C E £
V-3

-------























13
rH HI
J 3
-S
II














S5
(a -H
4-t £ 4-1
coo
o-nS
(SDH.


<
O O
fV] ,^J
C 0 tJ
O ^ 'S
Cj 1. Q
9 P Jr*
Pi fii f?[



•^ C
2 S
a --I
•U >l4J
C ETu
O (D M
ft En ft
g

•y **
c o
0 E "§
&"£ ft
3
-H
T3 S
I: 0
fl) -^ 3
(U rH S
ft a ft

a
N
•H
cn

M
Vi
ra a,
O ^
>-< o
eu o
ftp
^.
SOaOO OBO8B SO3OO OOOOQ Jj
5

_3 o
'D o
& —.0^
o o o *-.
o1 o o in 5
n o - i I
oo oo ooooooo^ -<-J'ino§
aoaao3oasS8  s i o o o
i— 1 i-t i-t OOO--
•H o o m o
•H f~- o -'-'in
O O -CM —
5 0 r-l — 0

ft V 03 •T T O
*— rH 1 I <»
r*i c'l GO 10 —
•* fft ci iH ^ i1
ro S
(NOBUO OSOCMiHinSBOO OOOOi-l ™
CM OOOOOO w
S < < o u o
W V


_,
o oo ooooooom B
B oS3 aaaoo aaooo oooor-i ffi
n
Si
S«
o
I! S q S*
is ii ^
BOOOO OHO8O 8BOOO O O O O O B-IM W§ 'jg
_• ^ -«J -rt -rl
d 33 'd « H
Si §Sfi^
S 6 u "o 5 ^
•^ o a o c
•gJ ttift«H
.i *" iiit
o < p a o rt o < ta o ^ ca u o o uuuuo c g 2 9 n ^
K jj & ft W >!
flj Q
in 9itnm ininffiot mo>inm m in m in in c
C\ r-f ^ O^ 0^ O\r^rH O^rHC^O^ 9kC^O9t 9V Q) id
MBoaf^**! Sforooooo Bnoocor) nnfOjon QQ
j^ f^c^c^. p^^^r^ r^r^r^r** r^r^p-r^r^ (Q
2*'Q ^H ^
«lt — S3 "n le"1-1 5
pi S 3) w Q 'd S
9i o iH CM n •* m \o r^ oo en o r-t ts <*) v m vo t* (N 
-------
>  3
I   §
EH  —
C  D U
  R ^


«-3
Ebi
JP r.® J?
& fc< Cu
  «
  •as
Et!|
  £
Oi
  -H C,
  CM 04
c    o
111
         oo o o o   o o o o
                                     o o o o   o o
        oofH^iB   o o o 01
              i CTl            Ol
        O O f> rH 8    Ot^OO
           »-i            r- o
                                               OlflrHrH   OCOOi-HO
                                               O Oi   Oi     M O CM
          corHtnro   o ^ o CM
          rHi-HrHf)   OVDOr-1
                                     cn in in GO    r*
                          U O     « O U U
                        tnminn   inmmtnm
                                                  o o m tc
              invo   r-moo^'f*i   inr-moco   oiOkooio
              ^3   co^ocorHcri   r^(*imf*ifN   (NI/IVOVM

              rH(N   
-------
























_
*o
rH fij
* J
M jj
1 S
E-. —























S§
4J E -d

0) ij 3

n u 0
£3£

H o
ll ij
cog
LJ u O
a 
C o

Jj k. Jj
8*3
SB'S
S £ fi

6
4J "-0
c a
Sal
1! t! ol

(ii
?j
•rH
§
-G C
+j 3 *•£
£ t
gj x -
Sfc-S
ffi m &


.8
w
t-
w

M
C-
-p <]
si

Jj
S/1
fr
f-H f
OH L



OOOC^O bOOOO OOJ^DOo
^t CO GO




oocooo Hoiono ooovoin
OiOO CTir-lOO >HcO










or-rM-wr- a^fNr-o om-woin
m M ON ^HrH rH ^



m t
t
fo o •— 4 o ^D dtnfi^o* cooono (
r^Oi-no(N iHm^ oom^r i
rH M «-t rH
1
i
1
SI
i

y I
5
u I
y i
O fl O ^" f*) ti O tf) O O O f*J ^H if^ O
0 •"• °° *" "2,1<
SJ
O f
•p i
U-l "J
0 i
rnucjoa ouu ^
f*iiTin-j *

1?
13
5
%.
-p
I
CO O
T) *-~ O
e" o o o"
o o in T
tr o-ii
K -m o o
fM 1 O O
t O O O
8^, o o - -
o o o in o
•H o o - —' in
4J O -M — '
O -.-H — O
^ "v *" *r S £
l-i co ^r -=r o
& r-f I I •«•
I k£ *3" ^O
r*^ ro co ^o -
•• O"l C^l rH ^- ^
§ v

M < < CD U Q
W v


3

i
! >i
i O -i -3
1 w 4) Q ?Q
I 4J U-i O 3
I
1 till
I S B. W X
J
3
3
D
^
i to c ^
•H Q pi
H X 4J -H £ O -H -H
j u < < O O E £
? 5 i i i i i j
J*
CO n £ K *~* S
Z5 £ W Q Q tJ U
D S < 0 0 E E
V-6

-------
taken  at  9026; only grab samples were taken from two silver
recovery units.  The waste stream samples at plant 2714 were
collected   in   38,000  liter   (10,000 gal)  tanks  prior   to
discharge.   Grab  samples  were taken from these tanks when
they were  essentially  full.

Plants 4550, 6237 and  1465 were sampled by EPA in  the  fall
of  1974.   Plant  4550  was  re-sampled in 1977 and the more
current data  are  included   in  this  report.   Plant  6237
discharged treated wash water directly to surface waters and
concentrated  chemicals  to   a POTW at the time of sampling.
Since that time, the plant has combined  the  waste  streams
and  is discharging to a POTW without end-of-pipe treatment.
The  data   are  no  longer  representative  of  the  plant's
operation.   Plant  1465  also separates the wash water from
the concentrated chemical wastes.   The  wash  water,  mixed
with  some non-contact cooling water, is discharged directly
to  surface waters  without  treatment.   The  concentrated
chemicals   waste stream is treated and discharged to a POTW.
The data for these two streams have been combined and appear
later in this section  under Effluent  Characteristics  After
End-of-Pipe Treatments.

Plants  6443 and 2488  were sampled by EPA in September 1976.
Samples  were   split   with  each  plant,  and  the  reported
pollutant   concentrations   are  averages  of  the  results
obtained by the plant  and EPA with a  few  exceptions.   The
silver  value   obtained  by  plant  2488 is reported and the
cyanide value obtained by EPA at 6443  is  reported.   These
individual  results are more consistent with historical data
from similar plants.    Both plants use  silver  recovery  and
bleach regeneration on all applicable solutions.   Plant 2488
treats  fix waste by precipitation with ferrous sulfate in a
batch operation for cyanide reduction before discharge.   No
batches  were   treated and  discharged  during the sampling
period so  that  the sample taken includes no fix waste except
for that carried over  into the wash water.   Such  fix  waste
is  included  in the EPA sample from plant 4550.   This plant
is similar  in process  and waste handling characteristics  to
plant 2488.  The data  for plant 4550 effluent containing the
waste fix  also appear  later in this section.

The  samples  collected during the 1977 EPA sampling efforts
were split with NAPM.   The pollutant parameter concentration
values reported in the following data tables are an  average
                            V-7

-------
of  the  EPA  and  NAPM values with the exception of certain
parameters measured in the  concentrated  process  solutions
(before  in-process  controls).  Because of the concentrated
chemical  content  of  these  solutions,  various   chemical
interferences  caused  some  inconsistencies  in the results
between the two labs.  The NAPM values for total cyanide and
silver  were,  in  general,  used   for   the   concentrated
solutions.   These  selections were necessary because it was
found that the standard EPA procedures did not  consistently
give  reasonable  results  for  those  concentrated chemical
solutions.   NAPM  used  modified  or  other  standard  test
procedures  in  these  cases  based on their experience with
photographic solutions and obtained results more  consistent
with  the  known  solution formulations.  The following is a
brief description of the major modifications made by NAPM on
the test procedures.

    Total cyanide -  In the presence of reducing agents  such
as  sulfites  and thiosulfates, an excess of chloramine T is
required.  After distillation, a determination was  made  of
the  amount  of  reducing  agent  present.   The  amount  of
chloramine  T  added  depended  on  this  result.   The  EPA
procedure calls for  a fixed amount.

    Silver   -   On  concentrated  samples  NAPM  used  long
digestion periods of 0.5 to 3  hours with one  hour  typical.
Nitric-sulfuric  acid  was added during digestion to prevent
dryness.  EPA digested directly to dryness  in  considerably
less time, potentially resulting in incomplete digestion and
low values.

NAPM   conducted  their  own sampling  effort in the  spring of
1976.   The results  include 31  plants  sampled for two days in
1976 and  6 plants sampled  at  various  times during the period
1973-1976.   Each sample  is  a flow   proportioned   composite
taken   from  the plant discharge during the daily production
period.   In  some cases the tested  samples  contain  sanitary
wastewater.   None  of  these plants use end-of-pipe  treatment
prior  to  discharge  except1plants 32 through 37  which   treat
waste    fix   for    removal    of   ferri/ferrocyanide  before
discharge; however,  no  treated  waste fix  was  discharged
during sampling.

In  this   section,   all   production   related   parameters  are
expressed in terms  of  surface area of photographic   emulsion
                             V-8

-------
 processed   in   units   of   thousand  square  meters  with
 corresponding English  units  of  thousand  square — feet — in
 parentheses.                   —  -    -  - -  —

 PROCESSES USED

 The processes used by the plants studied are listed in Table
 V 2.    Details  of  the  listed  processes were discussed in
 Section  III.    m  general,  the  process   chemistry   and
 procedure  at  each  plant  were the same as that previously
 described.    The  variances  observed  were  minor,   usually
 involving wash steps.   The number and placement of some wash
 steps   are  somewhat  dependent  upon  the  type  of process
 machine and squeegee usage.   In black and  white  processing
 it was  common for the stop step to be eliminated.   Sometimes
 a  hypo  eliminator  or  hypo  clearing agent step was added
 atter   fix.    Because  of  the  more  complicated   chemical
 reactions   and   critical   controls  necessary  for  color
 processing,   there  is  very  little  latitude  for   process
 variance.     Although   it   is   possible   to   substitute
 terricyanide  bleach for the  prescribed EDTA  bleach   in  the
 C-41  process,   no  plants  studied made this change.   Plant
 1232 uses EP-3  chemistry for color paper processing  but  has
 eliminated   the  stabilization  step.   The process,  then,  is
 essentially  identical  to EP-2 which has no stabilizer  step
 Plant   3075  uses a bleach-fix in the C-41  and C-22 processes
 for which  separate bleach and fix  solutions are  prescribed/
 the  bleaches   being  EDTA  and  ferricyanide,  respectively.
 This substitution is unusual  but  both  processes  had  verv
 limited  usage.                                             J
         .of  the  Plant  in-process  controls used by plants
studied  is given  in Table V-3.  The  silver  recovery  usage
column   refers to waste fix where  "all" means that silver  is
recovered from each fix solution from each process line.   In
the primary silver recovery column, the notation "B In-line"
refers   to  a  circulating  fix  solution  system  where   an
 in-line   electrolytic  silver  recovery  unit continuously
recovers silver from the fix.                              y

Plants 6208 and 7781 recover silver from the after-fix  wash
waters  and  recycle  a  portion of the de-silvered water  to
process use.   Plant 6208 uses  an  ion  exchange  system   to
recover  silver  from a mixture of waste fix and wash water.
A portion of the treated water is chlorinated  and  recycled
                            V-9

-------
                                       **•
                                       3 y

V-10

-------
a
a
P-
            u
            $
            i
                                                                  V A f> "g

                                                                  HlS 3

                                                                  S3S H
                                v-n

-------
V-12

-------
                                                 -a ,
                                                  § >.
                                                 i)-S
                                                 •as
                                                 Tl 0
                                                  8-5
                                                  a.?.
                                                    n
                                                  n g


                                                  11

                                                  "3 w

                                                  9 a
                                                  ,-s


                                                  15
                                                  rH
                                                  C.H


                                                  "6
                                                  O


                                                  ui ci
                                                    8^
                                                    in
                                                  a. y

                                                  as


                                                  2§

                                                  58.
V-13

-------


rr
F

|














g
&
e
1








;S
g)
!
^
ri









i


cs
~
en


ft
c-
Q
i
Q








§
N











1
£*













Method
i
Z C
CT..-J


., &
q y
K-H
Sci
e
X
•H

-6
r-t
e
3

fi
K
J,|

fa o


f
D


rH
•a



fv

E
n
u.

{
D
-P





1

X





g



t.


^
0






•-


^






C
,J


rt

o




SJ
I

X





71



&.


s
fa

^




— t


n
^









5

o




o

X





^



6.


^
fc.




71

fi


fi
^









i-
co





(LI

X





£»



6.


^
U

n




r-H


<






a
£


—

1C




0)

X





7*



fc.


§
fa

?




2


r
^









5

a




s

X





7f



U4


§
fa




•J

1
a.


c
^





>H
^


3

T




0)

X





?i



b.


g
0

t:


-a

1
Cu


ca
£





a.
gf


3

•ri




V

X





^



fa


§
0

n




a


«•






CU
ff


3

u
1



1

X





-



b


&
fa






a


P
*•





to
ff


3

-




o

X





^














g


CO






fl



a

r




I

X





-



E


Z
a

n




-H


a






DJ
^


3

*




1

X





-



&


6
g

n




2


03






CU
s-


3

*




C

X





^



fa


&
o

D




a


<






CO
,5-


3

r-




i

X





1?



§


§
g

Cl


c

s


ffl


1

IH
a



<
n
4-
n
C-

O3

|


01

X





yf



X


g
X

X




s

fl)
ft
z







**•
•5
ti
s

o




a

X





-



§


&
g






*


ca








**

3

•«




o

X





~



fa


§
g

111




a


«


?
•H
c


»
'J-

^f
a






i

X





%



fa


3
0

D







<








^

3
O
(-1




o

X





m



&


z
z

c




^


c







-


3
CO

                                      =>O

                                       i i
                                        -H  —I

                                        a S-Q
                                        Q Ql3
                                        -oiS j
                                        ss
                                      J  I
                                       Di O X
                                       a-H a
                                       ffi jj  m
                                         >i C J-l
                                       o H q nj
                                      •H O H in
                                      •"* H  *^
                                         0-5 s
                                       I  I  I  I

                                       < ca u o
V-14

-------
gd
                                                        1-sj.j
                                                        •n i" *J
                                                        Is?
                                                        xig
                                                         O  r-t
                                                        a  JJ
                                                         c  £
                                                         3 w 3 o
                                                         "KKS
                                                         £8.38
                                                         •d B -P -H
                                                            3 "ol

                                                         •O D 0 -W

                                                         Sag*
                                                          -S  Jl
                                                        •H C  .-)
                                                        •H -p C 3
                                                          So -H £5
                                                          O 01 'H
                                                         11(1

                                                        < CQ U Q
                            V-15

-------


VI
Hi

*u
OJ
CQ
0
1
4-1
d
OJ

f




&
8
i-4 -H
O -U
rH rH
cn u)
l|_| V
3 fi





n
I
u
a
3
3
0

3

i-(
a
•8
3
§•
H
U
,
S

1


4-)
%
fti

^ rH H
(0 (b tO ^
"i -H a TI
jj 4J "Z 4-1
(n«MM wuimiHtna] tn tn-oiujoiw wym
GiO)(D'oUl)(!)ajioS>i>''JliS><>H?-|C-i>t>'I3>i|Z>l2l>4>'I:H>H2>^Cj>'








to «3 CD
M -H M
•Z. 4-1 2
m ^•"If?^irtnn'rfrt:n?<:
iSii^iis^lSilSE^i^ii^ESiHZ


a a a c3 a a
<->*322;c-z>H








tg fo en ^
.^ -H M 'H
^ ti S" a w
iKtc.zS^^


C3
«-aoo<«»
^ ^-t ^ ^-i oi
Q tO Q t3 M
-H --t -H -H 2
4J Jj Jj JJ **
<;5tJC4=-.a-<2
rn
o
1
01 ci r-i 01 f*i CN rv) rvi
oooooooo
                                         II
                                         l\
                                        O 0
                                        a u
                                         2-H
                                         4J

                                        U ^ Ql
                                        •H O -P
                                        r-4 G •-(

                                        ffl tj ™
                                        -M GJ *W
                                        Q) r-IU-i
                                        S UO
V-16

-------
to  the process.  The waste fix has gone through primary and
tailing silver recovery prior to mixing with the wash water.
The  silver  is  recovered  from  the  resin  on   site   by
backwashing the resin with a proprietary concentrate.  Plant
7781  treats  the  wash  water  with  a reverse osmosis (RO)
system and	removes	the__s_i_lyer  frpm_ the  concentrate  by
sulfide  precipitation and settling.  Before introduction to
the RO unit, the  wash  water  is  equalized  and  filtered.
Plant 9061 also uses a proprietary resin ion exchange system
to  recover silver from wash water.  The silver is recovered
from the resin off site by a contractor and the  waste  wash
water is discharged.

While  ferricyanide  and  ferric EDTA bleach regeneration is
not as universally  practiced  as  silver  recovery  at  the
plants  visited, most plants do some regeneration of bleach.
In most cases where a bleach was  not  regenerated,  it  was
from a little-used process.

Dichromate  bleach  is not regenerated.  Some plants reuse a
portion of the bleach overflow by discharging a portion  and
reconstituting   the   remainder.    Plant   6208   uses   a
"replenish-on-demand"   dichromate   bleach    replenishment
technique  which  was described in Section III.  In addition
the plant uses a resin ion exchange  system  to  reduce  the
chromium  level  in  the  after  bleach  wash water prior to
recycle of the water.

WATER USE

Water is used in the photographic  processing  industry  for
the following purposes:

(1) Process water: film  and  paper  wash  water,    solution
                   make-up  water,  and  area  and equipment
                   wash water.

(2) Non-process water:  Non-contact  cooling   and   heating
                        water,      cooling     tower    (air
                        conditioning),  boiler,  and sanitary.

The total  (process  and  non-process)   water  use  for  the
facilities  visited  in  the  industry ranges from 13,200 to
2,100,000 liters per day (3,500 to 550,000 gallons per day).
It was observed that more than  95 percent  of   the  process
                           V-17

-------
water  use  in  each facility is for film and paper washing.
Unless otherwise stated, water use throughout this  document
refers to process water only.

Process Water

    Film and Paper Wash Water

The  largest  single water process use is _or the washing of
film and paper during various stages of  the  process.   The
function  of  the  wash  step  is to remove no longer needed
chemicals  included  in  the  emulsion  during  manufacture,
absorbed  into  the  emulsion during processing, or reaction
products created during processing.

    Solution Make-up Water

The chemicals used  to  make  up  processing  solutions  are
generally  supplied  to  the processor in the form of liquid
concentrates  or  powdered   chemical   formulations.    The
processor  adds  water  to  make up the solutions to working
strength.   Waterborne  wastes  are  generated  when   these
solutions  are  discarded  after  becoming exhausted or when
allowed to overflow during replenishment, as  is  the  common
practice.

    Area and Equipment  Wash Water

Water  is used for the washing and rinsing of  solution mixing
utensils,  storage  tanks,   and  processing machines  and  for
area washdown.

Non-Process Water

Some  facilities  use non-contact water  for   the   heating   and
cooling  of  process   solutions to  maintain proper  operating
temperatures.   This water  is not process water  since   it   is
contained  in enclosed  water  jackets around  process  tanks  and
does   not   come  into   contact  with   raw   materials   or  the
product.   Other non-process  water  uses include  make-up water
for  cooling   towers,   boilers,  and  lawn   sprinkling.    The
volume  of water used  for  these purposes  in this industry is
small  when compared to process  water  use  except in the  case
of large plants with  cooling towers for  air conditioning.
                            V-18

-------
Water Usage

Some  general   information   on  water use  is  included  in  the
results of the  industry survey and the EPA telephone   survey
tabulated  in   Section III.  This information  is  in terms of
ranges of total process water use.   During  the  EPA  plant
visits,  estimates  of  detailed  water use information were
obtained from the 20 plants  visited, and these estimates  are
presented in Table V-4 along with total  process  water   use
for  the remainder of the plants studied.   The average total
process water use for the 70 plants  from   which  data were
obtained  is  157,000  liters/1,000 sq m (3,850 gal/1,000 sq
ft) of material processed.

PROCESS WASTE

Process waste information was obtained from EPA sampling  in
1974,  1976  and  1977,  the NAPM sampling effort, and plant
supplied self-monitoring data.  A major portion of the 1977
EPA sampling effort was devoted to the sampling and analyses
for  toxic  pollutants  at   four of the five plants sampled.
Most of the data were obtained from wastewater samples taken
after the application of various  controls.   The  1977  EPA
sampling  effort  also included the sampling of some process
solutions before application of controls.   These  data were
obtained  to  assist  in  evaluating  the   effectiveness  of
various controls.  The production normalizing factor used to
calculate the cyanide and  chromium  amounts  found  in  the
following  tables  relates to the area of  emulsion processed
using ferricyanide bleach or chromium bleach,   respectively.
In  reference to the cyanide values obtained during the NAPM
survey,    the     actual     parameter     measured     was
ferri/ferrocyanide.    The  listed  total   cyanide  value was
calculated by NAPM by multiplying the measured value by  the
stoichiometric ratio of 0.74.

Tables  V-5  and  V-6  contain  pollutant   concentration and
quantity  information,  respectively,  on   various   process
solutions  before  any  application of controls.   These data
were obtained from grab samples collected  by EPA during  the
1977  sampling  effort.   The solutions selected for sampling
were those solutions that the particular plant reconstituted
or regenerated for reuse.   With these data, estimates  can be
made as to the impact on an  effluent of  not  reusing  these
solutions.
                           V-T9

-------
-?
tn
m
S
p
&.
1-t
•3
Q

tj'^
K
o w
o
o o
-o
0) .H"
V4\
* rj
*J (0

3~
E ^~
_4J
—
g
1
S
£
•S
ll
JH
£
(0
fo
S
4
?
^u
S
-H
•a
to
UP1*H
n
o W
o
o o
-o
r-t O
S*s
4-> ro
S-H1

E 4J
W
ET
o ffi
o
o o
-o
r-t O
ID r-T
-H —
£
o B
o
o o
§s
B ^
•H 0)


O O O O
S S S S
r-T t^" 04 
^n in r*^



^^
m
m
o
o *
(S * *
(S*


o S
•"*• \£>
» r^
t— t n
^^ ^^
O O
o o *
o o *
in ro
o in
tn 1-1
S —
V CT*
^H en
^*** ***f
O 0
o o *
p^ O *
in ^i



o o o
f-1 (N •«•
O O O
0 O O
o o o
O •-> CM
id o o^




-^
a
* .H *
* f-l *
f


S
t^
^~
cs"
*NP'
o
* o *
* o *
r-i*
O
•H
in
M
*"* '
O
* O *
* o *
t-l



o

0 0
o o *
O OJ *
i^> en
CTI ^H



to
^
o
* en *
* (H *




S
$

o
* o *
* fl *
CO*
l-t
^f
tH

O
* r~ *
* tn *




o
m
o
o
o
CM
w




in
o
o
M



o
in
en
ro

o
o
o
1-1
S
m
•H

o
m
in




o
(S
o
o
o
o
rH





*
«







*
*




*
*




0 0
V O
en r-t
O 0
o o
0 O
M ft
*Jr *^



_
ro
en
o
o *
CO *
m


o
r-
co
CO

O
o *
o *
r-t

In
r-
rH

S *
iH *
r-



o
o
\0
o
o
o
CJ
Svl





*
*







*
*




*
*








0)
1
Water In



E?

S
cr
o ft
o
o o
liters/1
(gal/1,0
%X
fO "a
rH O
a O

o
CO
o

0?
^^
o
o
* * * * r-
^-
CO
,-t in co M r-i
(N *r «H "* f>
O O iH U> (N
O O O O rH
s
O
o

rH
V
^*
O
o
o
o
r-
VD
i-i
r-t
(S
^
fH

O
O

^
r~
*—*
o
o
en
CO
01
in m
J 
-------

ffs-
o m
0 0

£ nj
•H I?
rH —

O
o
m
fi
o
o
o
fl
fH

O
1C
i'
o
o
o
rH

O
o
rH
in
o
o
o
r-
o

o
o
rH
O
O
o
o
r^
in

o
o
rH
O
o
o
I—
in

o
o
fl
o
o
o
r-
rH

O
O
r-
r-j
o
o
o
ON
o
iH

O
O
rH
O
o
ON
v

O
m
*t
CJ
o
o
o
o
o
rH

O
o
rH
o
O
3

(N
rH
O
O
m
rH
U1

o
o
(N
O
O
O
CM

o
o
ON
-»
o
o
o
o
o
(N

O
o
o
fl
o
o
o
0)
f>J
rH

O
ki
o
o
o
ON

O
ON
O
o
CO

o
o
-3-
o
o
o
o
CO
rH

o
o
rH
O
O
o
o
in

o
(N
)
O
O
o
fl
ON
fN
s
  S1
o
o
o o
S (0
•H tn
  sr
                                                  o  —
                                                  o  o
                                                  o  o
        —    o

*
r->
O
O
in
f!
o
o * * *
rH
O
CO
rH
o
ON
in
o
o *
CO *
in
in
O
(N
(N
o
(N
O
o

£ *—*
4J
cr "*"*
w
Ojn
fj
•• o
r-l O
K -H"

B fH
4J (Q
•H G"1
•H —
4-1
nj *S
iH O
Cu O
^,
o
o
r~
«.
S
o
o
o
(N
ON
•H



(N
(N

O
O
O
•I
o
rH
o
O
0 *
r-
o
^



in vo
in vo
^r ^1
O
O
o
*
^
-4
O
O
O *
O
r-
in


ON O
CO rH
*r in
J-,
o
in
**D
^
d
O
O
0 *
oi"
^<
rH



in in
f) in
m m
	 .
o
(N
in

(N
o
o
* o *
ro
O
rH



P"- O fl
rH fN CM

^^
O

fl
^
rH
O
o
CO * *
<-T"
in




^r co (M
TT Li"> t~~
<& \C VD
,_,
o
o
fl
^
fl
o
o
o
in

rH



O
r-


^^
o

*r
o
o
in
r-
rH




00
r-
r-
. 	 ,
o
o
(N
*
TT
O
o
o *
rH
r-
rH



in (N
O fN
CO CO
o
c
fN

in
rH
o
o
o
oT
rH
^n



10
O
ON
O
C
CO
•h
(N
.H
O
O
O
(N
(N
m



ON
fN
ON








*






ON
ON
                         V-21

-------
   sr
   o
   o
   o
 M
 *-
 g&
Jl
ill
0- O
  o
i:
ti
^'
&
                          oooooooo
      ooooooooo
      ooooooooo
                          oooooooo
                          oooooooo
                          OCDOOOOOO
      OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
                            —       o
      o o o oooooooo~oooooo"oS
      ooooooooooooooooooo
      ooooooooooooooooooo
      oooooo^rooocnooooococovo
      i-JCMM^-mvpi— co
      OOOOOOOO
      (N(NM(N(N(N
-------
    sr
                                        —     o
  H.3J
    5T
  o o
    o
  u  O

  fcj
•a
o
o o

fcH§

W r-l
                   0)  O
  S-~
  8"
    B"
  O

  o o
   -o
  r-l O
                                        —    o
          LI  CO  (N
                                   V-23

-------
V.
0.
1
i*H

^
in
to

V4
CH
§
2
Q
I
,_!
8
4J -O
_g §
C 51
J3 *i
T 5
II
%^
o ft
o
0 O
•-O
"jjS
q .H
+J CD
-rj 01
i— 1 •^•^
E_
S1^
o ft
o
O 0
-o
i— * O

11

E A>
O U)
0
0 0
N.^
in rH
flj rH
* 2.
0 O
O 0
f^ Cf ^, «

O O O O
O O O O
CO CO oT (N*
^ 1— 1


o ,-~ .-^
CN i—t ["*
 o

in
CM

O
OJ

fl) O Q) m

in
co

O 0
^r o

O 0
PI co
1-1


M
*2

0) o




en"
CO

Q) O
JO

ff.


o
o

o
o
o *
—1

o
m
Cft
oT

o
o
o *
o
tN




O
5 *
™


o
l-i
CN

O
O
r-i
cn
CO


In
in

o
(S


o
CO
o
(M

O
o
f^

00

o
o

o
o
o
cd"
co
CM





*
*





*
*



O K
O

O O
      o
      o —
        o
                                          o o o
                                          •31 rH W
                                                                 -H r-l

                                                                 DI  RJ
                in m  in
                                 V-24

-------
Table  V-7  contains  data  obtained from grab samples taken
before and after various silver recovery operations.   These
samples were taken during the 1977 EPA sampling effort.

Tables  V-8  and  V-9  contain  pollutant  concentration and
quantity information, respectively,  on  the  effluent  from
plants   using  in-process  controls  for  silver  recovery,
coupler recovery, and bleach regeneration where  applicable.
A  description of the in-process controls used at the plants
was previously given  in  Table  V-3.   The  hydraulic  load
values  given  in  Table  V-9  may not always agree with the
process water values for a specific  plant  given  in  Table
V-4.   The process water information in Table V-4 represents
estimates or long-term averages  in  most  cases  while  the
water  data in Table V-9 generally represent a measured flow
over a relatively short sampling period.

EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS

The results in this section describe plant  effluents  after
the  application  of  various end-of-pipe treatments.  These
treatments are in addition to  the  various  controls  which
were previously described.

End-of-pipe  treatment  information  for  plants  using such
treatments is given  in  Table  V-10.   Table  V-11  contains
before-   and   after-treatment  data  for  some  individual
treatment operations.  Tables  V-12  and  V-13  contain  the
plant  effluent  data  for  plants using in-process controls
plus end-of-pipe treatments, pollutant  concentrations,  and
amounts, respectively.
                           V-25

-------
       o o o
       o o o
       o o o

       co fi in
       fN in O
       .-1 fN fN
       CN CO ^
       vfl CN CO
       in  -co
                 o o o o
                 in o O o
                 r- -a -v f
                 ooo'


                 fN CN i-t i
                 p-H O CO CO



                 -H CN -  -
                   o o o
                 en o o o
                 CO O O O
                 o  - -  -
                  -T CO O
                 o   o o
                 o o o o
                  -en ft O
                 O fN -  -
                 •->  -m co
                 V CO r-4 CM
                     1/1 CN
                     IN CO
                   r*l O in
             O O O
ooo   ooooo
O O O   OOCOOCN
TTCOCN   ^^C>  ...
 ..»    --1OCN\O
OCOCO   COfNOCnO
rroiin   c~-infMCNm
                                     CO O 1C CN .-H
                            in CN CN
                            CN TT O

                            ooo
         in o r-t   r-
          •  -  • fN  •
         t~~ o a fN o
       fN O \O


       T CN O
                                     --I fN \O f) CTl
CN CN CN
OOO
o o p
OOO
ooo
o 10 in
•-i 1-1 in
o
o o p -H
o o o o
in m o in
r- r- en -H
o CN n r-
•«• f-J CO
c*1 O \D
o p o
c o
in o
. -en

CO
o
o
o
LA
»— O CM
•"-( O CO O
o o o o
O C O in

                                      C"1 O CT1 tJ1 D1
                                      33335
5
i- 5)
     |_2_      i_~-:::-  S"'iia    g* 5* ^ — —

  3|ryx    '"^xx  s| -^ ^   IJ'y'yxx
^v..-,^    -r  -  J y   _|"C^   ^ 2 ^ ^ 3
                            s^-^   335^-
             V-26

-------




U-l
s
o
o
o
r-l
5
Q
W
o
o
o
i-H

CJ
^
,
£ ,
il
4J
4J
3
1
&











Vl
1

s
-d
|







_
g
.H
>S
«S
O






*
•H
§
o1
1 O <•> 1 * 1 •" 1 ui
C —1 1 O 1 O 1 O 1
i-4 O.H O rH O r-l O
x *• __^ *"* x — — • 	 ^ x "^ x ^
inocvX coir, Sxxx
inromo'-t'H f-ioo^-f^p-ii-i en in
*— * "- * o "^ o "**'' ^c> "^^ o '*-' r~* '^•^ o — ' lrf>J
101010 i o t o i o i o 1010
O-HOrHOrH OfHOfHOr-lOiH O-HOfH
x^^^xX xxxxxxx* xxxx
fsj-iH-r^- in«o-m«c>' o»r^-cN



.— . — -~ — . — — .
*n 1 
Or-lOi-IO--* 1 Ol OOfHI O O-HOfHI
r-t f-t «-H OfHOrHrH O»H f-H ^-1 O
VVV_^_u Sr*^ VV^^J
XXX XXXX XX
rH^
I 1 I 1 I

I
Se
Jiffi
 4J fl)
 01 Q
                 V-27

-------
11
y,
               O   CN       --I    O
                             o    o   o
                             in    ON   (N    CO
                             CM    <~1   .H    -a
                                                                              \ft   tpi    *r
                                                                               ...
                                                                              in   fi    I-H
                                                     CNi-IlD
          eo o ft o n o    eooo^Of-loo   .    (j, ^
                                                                                                    in  *O  *o^  *co  »r*i
                                                                                                     . m   • n>  * *   • -H  •
                                                                                                    ^H — rTl 	 CN — \O 	 (NJ
                                                                           ,  T-
                                                                           1  o i   o
                                                                           09   • (N  • vfl   -ID  • •* X
                                                                             • a\  -IN   •  o  • o   •»
                                     ^   co    o     i
                                      -(N— Tt •—
           1     1      1
           1     1      1
!   B
                                                     fvj  . vo  . o
                                                        o  >o  -o
                                                                                                    o  -in   - \o
g u   !

? -ii   '
Vj 3i   i
4J i   I
                                  V-28

-------
  01
r- tn
> O



Ig





c

c

~
cn
1


S



s1 tt
b K





'i

*
3
£ r

JB
c



^



ft

Q]

3
s
*r
*
O 1
IN 1


X 1
"-

— t 1
O


CO I
O


o
o


33 1
CM 1
O
O
in c-

—i «•




r- I



c
r-H 1
O
in

r- i


—i
—i i
r-


i- i



Or" -•! O
-r-- » »
„


<.-•-. ;r> ~

o o o o

o c\

• • ^ \s
O O f> CN
^ o r- •
o o ort





ii i i
it ii

TT
C rH

f-1 O \Q 
kO ^-1 CN
01 O O O
«*o o o
V

o o

r- -a-
-• r- in
r^* n ft v


fN fl
PI O
1 1 O O



CO



in o
&\ G\
kD O


• rH

0 0
0 p



0 O
CM (N
O O
o o





i i
i i

o o

o o


«t-*
o o
c c



CM rH
O O
O O



i-H •
CM "T


rH r-i
O O
O 0




      "1
      Ub
                   V-29

-------












3
•H
1

Sh»
€
w O

S flj
S -.-J
Q c
8 g
1 ^
5 •-(
D 0
O Q.
fe
s
M
co E-
> §
S3 Eu
1 s
3
3
M
E"
Ul
M
g
i
D

a
1
r
rl









VJ
D

71
E-


"S
ID
3

|

c
U ifl

M H
-* i
z <

Q
a
s
5

.-
i
b

g
•j
TC
y
£

-|
5



a


if
-t

g
-H
-U
U-l
l-t
i-l
0]
g
J.
'i
i
jj
(H n
rH C
0. C.
-a TT o o r— o
Q co o in co iH
o I-H CN II "-1 1 cocnl •-! CJNVO
~ co IB ii -t ,,i T ^ _7
rH \3 S rH r-l i-l rH in r-l
1 •* 1 T 1 0 rH -T j CO
1 p-H 1 rH CO 1 ^" O i— 1 VO *
I d! di ii ddi o 10
O CO
CT, rH CN m r-
i i! irj ii ^-d-T --t ifn



in
in o . .
i ii 1-11 ii* i
i ii I in i ) lit- i I'

r- t— ^ouioo mo
O OCTi 1O CN*T O^lTl CN \O^>
^ o\^r 1 (*> fncN ficsco CN r~rH
a ^to ianc~- locfto
Q. CNin r-c-4 no •* m (*t CN min
 ir- t~-l r-l r-[~-r~- r~ r» r»
cri ini lifl ffitN ill * 22
in
rjj in CU
j flj j- QJ rfi j 4J
w S 0] « « J3 ?M'm
-H J Q rH -H -H -H -H O 'H ""n E1
•CCNP-I rH C CN£j3J5j:in>^^rN^CNCN
rH -H  ta ci o cu E^FCJ pc-u cqcq4J4J P-y Pe1
J5 ffi >U-HQ > > fa >-Hb'H-r)-rt alooaij 33
pSoS>•'v^lnf*^CN
O O rH \^ CN f^ ^" ^* \DrHr'S^^*^lr*fcCOO^'^1VOCN
OOO O'-H-Hi-HrHi-ICNCNCNrNCNfNCNMfO'^^l^1













g
.rH
*H


S 3


I 's
p* X
a. UH
5 3
i i
g --a
« "Si 3
cq g 3
S .,
3 q •
rH a q
, H~i
ui 3 0
*H S ^ O
IH n C
-U W.C O
O rC O
iunSS
IM fli ^
0 u 3 0
0 &j:
5 J B §
q Mr-i'a
J-J -H J3 (0
c-3 4J
-H q -^
i* 'D O,
W C^-H
8up.fi
5 6 c
3j ca sj >
W Q 
-------
       >•%
eo K
i  S
> C



1!
                                   J3
                                                              --I f3

                                                              g£
S
*g
£
0

^

_H

S



'Tj
a
i
U^J
Sanplo In
LoiT
4J
-2-
[tescr

E Q)
%•&














C
•-t
£
n:

"3
>
1C
4J

IN
fj

^-
°

1

-^

t^
UJ
C'

_*j
U!
5
&
fc
1
f-J

t*-l
o
i

c
in
in

r--
d

tr.

[^
f




c.
£
-H
M
U
fc
£
~
*3"
(N
a>
•H
H1
•H
«

O
in
1.1

.-•
CC
U-i
&

r*~

**
j
V.
c

w
p
fe
1
*r
!N
*T
t.
I

1














&
1
-H
g
TO
1

CO
o
fi
d
u-<
"S
1^
1
r-j






i
u
C
CJ
1— 1
E?
.-1
w

o
CN
I-l
in


o
U-l
S
l£
r-
i
CO




£
-H
tt
•rt ^
> Si
^ *r*i
2 w

CJs tN
in LI
i-^ ir.
T--
M:
o
14-1
f*
p
i

^



M
S
•-I
I
1
IN

!«-•
O
<

1— 1
vfi
in

0
u-
a
r~

c-
•-<
in
c
jj

in
E
t
lo
cc



*3-
LH



^_^
rc


1^

""


f

.—
K
P
f^
Sinqle 24-hr. !
Mot avail able
\c -



o-
c^



1— 1

"
^
r^
l

^





£
_P
T
cc
Not availal>lc
Avtj. of 1 to 3
Compos i tes
r- CM



"2
S
s-i
4J
S

o
p
1-1
o


5
•C
Q
c
•H
V.
L.
4_j
ra
§
H;
ra
05
(.1
^
&.
- flow proporti
ant has divided
E
d,
u1.
in

0
t.
CL
c.
c--
VJ

^
ID
•D
4J

10
"£
_^
4-
C
•u
u-
O
5
H
^J
1-
£
•— i
§
in
4->
§
&
C-
£
-
o
H
•t?
^
B
1


Q
C
•H

*

§

•F*
1«
O
<4~
•B
1
4->
«
8
•c
£
O
M
S
1
S
5

u
p
C1
fe
w

c
0
J-l
J
H

C
c
Q.
J?

>:
u-
tt
in
i
«
4-1
§
4J
"u
1
4J
J
E
                               V-31

-------
r-
  •  m
rv  in
in  ro  o  i-t
                             CM  c^  *!•  CN  m
                     O  CN  O  «H  CN
                                                  "•I  CM  (N  IT)
                                                     •H  CM  CM  ri
                                       O  O  O  O
         V-32

-------
   SH 4J
   J C
ffl  O< O
<  fe 0
^  <*—

iH
rti
3
-H
i-H
^
£
H
EH
1
1
|
1






5
•-I
ffl
s
£




f*l
^
e
8

D
s
4J
go
fH 5
cv. D

(£> \o kO I-H iniHrsicorj^r
o i-t ^* (M •vr'ivovc^'in





cvi in «* ^- f^i \c
r-ocooinr-orjmr-tNiHcii^L'i
r-rHiHtMCM--^>-lr-C^J-OOOCiO
CO^vDtN^-O'VVC^DCDVpM O^O
coci[~-m^io^'<~^r--c>l^'-i'(''f^o
ri:kDinm^jirorH^csJr--vDf^ctNr)
r-T r-T
r- ^ n m
["-(N^r^o * *ro itNCDvo^' «co
r--(Ninoin^D
infMCNi-iiNr-infninncNrHCNr-^

i*i^*iD*er^ooci OfHtNci^uDvor*
(NCN
-------
                                    —    — —     CO
             ST
                                                   -_  —•  o
a  §
g  J
                                                                                           &s
             S-rr
                                    o    ~
                                                   —.  ,-, o
             3 -n
                                 -H
                                 4J
                                                               01  0)
                                                               A  iH





                                                               CD  lu


                                                               S  «
                                                                                     w o "O   H
                                                                                     m   3 oj -O
                                                                                           -5
                                                      IN Oi  IN  CN  It
                                           V-34

-------









s
sr
o
o
o
rH
Jls
•H
—
s
&
o
o
o
rH
\.
cr
•^
*.
§
£
J
rH
rH
o
a















1
•r-






p
•d
8
ST.







r*
I







%
H
§
O



- ^S
Jo
0 O
U -0
•H rH O
-H \ -
3 U) rH
i" ^ "X>
l-l 0) rH
•a j-> i-H !7
•s
rH
co a
f1!

^
o- o


_
in
rH
O
o

r-
o
o








i
i


s
\
O
rH
.,

01
CM
O
o
d




in
o
o

(M
^
d



in
(M
—

O
O
o
rH
D 00
1
O
rH
X
CN
VD r-f
O
tN
— - o
fl """'
rH (T,
o in
0 0
o o








! i


~
1
« o
~ rH
J 1 V
1 0
O rH ^
rH —
. X
X CN
[- O
CO • O
• in •
(N — O
V





5?
**?
O

1 
o o
0 0
o d
*~" ' — '
CM *r
0 0
o d




— S
o va
rH 0
d d
.Ol CM
"^ ^
0 0




c^
"l
^
o X
(N
t O O
1 0 •
o •—•



	 	 b
CO
CN
O
•~~ O
CN O
d
rH
CN O
rH O



0 O
0 0
T in
m CN"

0 0
o o
o o
CO* CN*
1*1 O
rH rH
rH d;


CO CO
o o
CN D \O
















































available
I

r-
fN
10



^"^ ^-*
« in ^,
1*1 CN ro
O O O
O O O
l-» r*l [-•
rH ^H rH
O O O



-^
rH
O
O
•
o
in i i
S ' '
o
d
o *""

f-^
X H
	 j „
CM CO
rH 01
o m
0 I 0
d
V o
V



CO
O ^-,
O VO
• rH
o .
01

0 1 (£
d ' d



000
\Q \G O
CN CN  J*>
« a

fl f*J to ^J1
^r co CN <»
"^ vo VD r^



rH

o
o

^
in
o
d




rn
rrt
O
o
ID
rH
d







1
1





m
^H
o
CO
ID
d



o
CM
•»
^^
§ |
1-1 o
irt
*f Qj (U OJ C
(I) rH 'OJ ,H rH 1j
^jQ {Q fj ij '3
^ > > > o
ft
g) jJ jj jj
fl b O Q Q
W 3 323

'H CO ID rH r^ CM
CO in (M ID (Ti «•
r^ o CM o CM 01
r* co co ch cr\ en










s A


&
§ C
C "
4J Jj
W 0
S «
S "x
•H -H
ti
Q (D
P S)
/^ S
Uj S
G • 'O
•H -O QJ
m fl
*° *H S
E 5 fT^
CO H
0] S 01
M S tQ

3 ^j c i^ flj
r-i 3 3 O JJ
Oj 3 W O ffi
"H JV
tn Q •§ .3 g
rH fl S y (fl
13 M ^ 3 QJ
•3 01 W 8
O 0 W M
1) M QJ
SB s o
& i 5
S O A in
rH *H JJ
Ss^I
WOT! &
01 3 Q) 4J
g C rH J3
ajJ W
O 44 U4
n jj a) jj gi
J OJ 5 JJ JJ
o QJ Jo 3 i3
^ S -rf 7* *
i CG Q & 0j
V-35

-------
-

g
                                                      f*1      — ^-  sj
                                                      r*      W fl  1-1


                                                      O      (N \D  (N
                                                               -_  —  O
                                                               o  c  —
                                                    f^l  f->     -~
                                                                               1  1
                                                                           I   &
                                                 in  IT1   O
                                                                I/I  CO  CC
                                  VO  M
                                                                                      r»*  if*  o  03
                                                                                      **i  L.I  r-^  *Ni
                                                                                      ^  ^-  vO  (N
                                                    V-36

-------
    n  in  •=•
    Ul  60  CD


    o  w  ^
       _.  CD




       pH  O
       co  co

       r^  O
                           *—  m     •—•
                    S     ~     ~  "      S    w
T     —i  o
o>     o  o


I     ss

       o\  d
up     in  >H
*     o  o

dido
                                              i   i
                               eh  r-  rn     —
                                      ^  -S
                            •S  >
                            t-j  Q)


                             5  I
or. o  O  ic  en  o
                        in  in  r-  o
                        <^  in  »H  ts
                        in  m  us  10
                                                            eo  in  
-------
I   8
                         o o
                      o  -o
                      —4 i-< O
                      iri  Q r-t
                      •O -M  (0
                      >i-H  en
                                                                                                                                       (N  fl CO fM  CO
                                    ^-,^~ — —    CM
                                    m^invD-^t-t
                                    rsjro^cn--fO
                                    OOOOCM   .
                                                                                                                        r- — . — • o>
^   .O-HO  -
 . O   •   •  • O
O •— ' O  O O — ^
                                                                                                 o   •   -o
                                                                                                   . O O   •
                                                                                                                                                     o
                                                                                                                                                      •
                                                                                                                                                     O
                                                                                                                                              — co  • —
                                    (Nr--(Nr--fnmcoi-^^'aof^n^HPOcO'— O — ro in ^-  »inr^in'^cof*ifNO^'f*i^ii/i  ^ co^-
                                    ^^r^^oochfNioO'-
-------
         .5
       38
        0 0
       •k
ri  •*•


I  i
       fii
              j-i

              S
X  X   X  X   ffi   X  X
                             X      X
                                           X  X
                             V-39

-------

















<_,
3

f— 4
S
S
2
w
G
GJ
2
3
1
ij
a
r-l
i-H
S






































£"
p


,f
£

3
a
c
g

M
U
C

i

S
S
a

r-
3
j
g
n
£,
g
°


-H
•9
<3
O

w
*5
'
5



o
a
*;
S





-1
J Q]




o o
o o

* *•
r^ m



fN (N


I i

CO r-t
tN r-4
EN r-t



! !
CO (N
CM m
en CM
T O

in r-
in **!
O O


in in
fi f*>

rH O

in in
o o
o o
V V

0 O
o en
t-- Ci
* *
m CN
rN CM
O O

d d
V V



I
O

O «-"
CO W O
?ss
'slti'g
T fl 3 g
•O m >a S
W JJ B Tt
i-H
g

a)
^
i m
S u
O -d
"* §
4J S 4J
. g«i
ipled Streal
scri ption
Is

fjJ
x
O
luent to Ozi
cncentrated
nation Eff 1'
UJ O Q
c — s
M O
in
\o
T
i-t


in

co IN m o
-CO i-H CO

m CD

0 T -4
tN r-i r-i en
in in in
en o o o
o . . •
. o oo
en eo


fH r-t in O

r-l (N tN
o r- o o

d .do
v o v v

in en
! 9 ! r-T
p us i r-
CN
T en o

\o o o v

CM tN
eo o l
If) O rH

T
CM 10 O
(-• rH .
. o
O O V


U3 T
. . •
T O O

o o in
r-< in r-
r- T rH
i* » «
m ft CN



1 1 1
1 1 1



r
ii
%4
s^ ° a
•H 4J C -H
Qj C O Q«
a?!!!1?
slllSfi
i
>
3 o
Ul r^f Q *H
I"S i
: ^ S -S
gsilsis






m
tA
tn
•43

tN

rH

O
d

VD

tN

^

<*
O
in
(M
m

m
»-t
r-t

f*}
o

d
V


rt
,
O

O
O

VI
CN



1
1







£
1
!
g
jj
i *
f *>
1
II




V-40

-------













U)
t-t 'H
& *"
£ in
g >i
D c
£
6. I
a j-1
£ P
i ii
H G
£0
C
i 8

H a?

P .3
1 S
*"
H
1
b.
g
LJ

^

g
i
u

?*•
<
°;
k

8
r-
2
|
2
^
D
s-
E
5
I

















CQ



B
-o
QJ

-
D
£4
M

1
§*
pl'H
o c
C H
jJ £
•H E
z 
O T
O rH

rH
r-
""

i-l

1
1

in

in





in
rH

r-
in


en
rH
O



in
o
d


in
o
d
V


CO
d



ir
in
o
o

1


tr
1
rH
1-1






S
•H
S
fV
C
H
°
^"


(N
0)

r^i
to

in
W)
w
rH

\n
M


I

|
'


1
1





|
1
Ci
en


•3-
O
o




I



1



1
1



<*J
o

<*-<
rH
S



r-
Cl
rH







(ft

D
rH
Q



U-l
0


i

^~
rH
r-
fN
in
•H

m
in
S
S

cs
en

O^
m




o
in
fi
rH
rH



r-
IN



O
d


r-
o
d


04
r-
to



rH
rH

1



r-
co


-,
0)
ro
^j
Vi
3

o
o
o
CO



UH


rH
Tl




«
in

-

rH
•*

d

vo

!N





P-
in
in
in
rH



P-
rH



IN
O
o



o
o


r^
in
rH


•I-
O
d

1



7
r-


f
a
'w
o
I
fr.


_y
(N



U-l
0


?
•c

rH
cc
p»
r-



















3
—i
Uj
1
S
-U
tn
0
a
c
Q
-^n
JJ
K
a
a
a

-H
1
c
!R
K
JJ
c
£
3

^
£
u
• a
tn 4J

5§
tJ S
3 C
-. C.
6 «-
t< c
0 ^
c ^
3 (C
^•6
C ffi
JJ -*H
"^ 4J
2 §
£ *t
n:
|«
^
v^

if
c; c
n c
a.t
2
PH-* X

3 .2r

-"" £
" «
en 4.
K
JH r
C- £
_ r.
V-41

-------

—.  OJ
M   .

ri  S
                        am • to
                        S .0 m S
                        8.8.
         V-42

-------
H 1

                   V-43

-------

-------
                         SECTION VI

             SELECTION OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS


The Agency is concerned over potential discharges  of  toxic
pollutants  from industrial sources.  A comprehensive effort
was conducted to determine if these pollutants  are  present
in  wastewaters  from  photographic  processing.   The toxic
pollutants are  listed  in  Table  VI-1.    The  conventional
parameters   listed   in  Table  VI-2  and  non-conventional
parameters listed in Table VI-3 were  also  selected  to  be
sought  in  the field data collection program.  In addition,
related published data and  NPDES  permit  applications  for
direct  discharges  in this industry were examined to assist
in this determination.

The wastewater characterization  detailed  in  the  previous
section  has  been  reviewed  to  determine  what wastewater
constituents are contributed to  photoprocessing  wastewater
in significant quantities.  A toxic pollutant was considered
significant unless one or more of the following was true:

    (a)  the pollutant was not detected,
    (b)  its presence was due to incoming water, or
    (c)  it was  present  in  concentrations  below  current
         water quality criteria.
                           VI-1

-------
                         TABLE VI-1
                      Toxic Pollutants
acenapthene
acrolein
acrylonitrile
benzene
benzidine
carbon tetrachloride (tetrachloro-
 methane)
chlorobenzene
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
hexachlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
1,1,1-trichloroethane
hexachloroethane
1,1-dichloroethane
1,1,2-trichloroethane
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
chloroethane
bis(chloromethylJether
bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
2-chloroethyl vinyl ether (mixed)
2-chloronapthalene
2,4,6-trichlorophenol
parachlorometa cresol
chloroform (trichloromethane)
2-chlorophenol
1,2-dichlorobenzene
1,3-dichlorobenzene
1,4-dichlorobenzene
3,3l-dichlorobenzidine
1,1-dichloroethylene
2,4-dichlorophenol
1,2-dichloropropane
1,2-dichloropropylene  (1,3-dichloro-
 propene)
2,4-dimethylphenol
2,4-dinitrotoluene
2,6-dinitrotoluene
1,2-diphenylhydrazine
ethylbenzene
fluoranthene
4-chlorophenyl phenyl  ether
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
bis(2-chloroisopropyl)  ether
bis(2-chloroethoxy) methane
methylene chloride (dichloro-
 methane)
methyl chloride (chlbromethane)
methyl bromide (bromomethane)
bromoform (tribromomethane)
dichlorobromomethane
trichlorofluoromethane
dichlorodifluoromethane
chlorodibromomethane
hexachlorobutadiene
hexachlorocyclopentadiene
isophorone
napthalene
nitrobenzene
2-nitrophenol
4-nitrophenol
2,4-dinitrophenol
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
N-nitrosodimethylamine
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
pentachlorophenol
phenol
bis(2-ethylhexyl)  phthalate
butyl benzyl phthalate
di-n-butyl phthalate
di-n-octyl phthalate
diethyl  phthalate
dimethyl phthalate
benzo(a)anthracene (1,2-ben-
  zantnracene)
benzo(a)pyrene(3,4-benzo-
  pyrene)
3,4-benzofluoranthene
benzo(k)f1uoranthene
  (11,12-benzofluoranthene)
chrysene
acenaphthylene
                           VI-2

-------
                  TABLE VI-1  (continued)
anthracene
benzo(ghi}perylene(l,12-ben-
 zoperylene)
fluorene
phenanthrene
dibenzo{a,h)anthracene (1,2,5,6-
 dibenzanthracene)
indeno(l,2,3-cd) pyrene
 (2,3-o-phenylenepyrene)
pyrene
tetrachloroethylene
toluene
trichloroethylene
vinyl chloride (chloroethylene)
aldrin
dieldrin
chlordane
4,41-DDT
4,41-DDE(p,p1-DDX)
4,4[-ODD(p,pl-TDE)
a-endosulfan-Alpha
b-endosulfan-Beta
endosulfan sulfate
endrin
endrin aldehyde
heptachlor
heptachlor epoxide
a-BHC-Alpha
b-BHC-Beta
r-BHC-(lindane)Gamma
g-BHC-Delta
PCB-1242 (Arochlor 1242)
         (Arochlor 1254)
         (Arochlor 1221)
         (Arochlor 1232)
         (Arochlor 1248)
         (Arochlor 1260)
         (Arochlor 1016)
PCB-1254
PCB-1221
PCB-1232
PCB 1248
PCB-1260
PCB-1016
toxaphene
antimony (total)
arsenic (total)
asbestos (fibrous)
beryllium (total)
cadmium (total)
chromium (total)
copper (total)
cyanide (total)
lead (total)
mercury (total)
nickel (total)
selenium (total)
silver (total)
thallium (total)
zinc (total)
                         TABLE VI-2
                  Conventional Pollutants

                             pH
                             BOD
                             COD
                             Oil and Grease
                             Suspended Solids
                           VI-3

-------
                         TABLE VI-3
                Non-Conventional Pollutants
Acidity
Alkalinity
Carbon, organic (TOO
Chlorinated Hydrocarbons
Color (units)
Cyanide (am. chlorin.)
DO
Fe(CN)6
Fluoride
Hal ides
Hydroquinone
Nitrogen-
 Ammonia
Phenols
Silica
Solids -
 Total
 Dissolved
 Volatile
Specific conductance
Sulfate
Sulfite/Thiosulfate
Surfactants
Thiocyanate
Turbidity (units)
Aluminum
Barium
Boron
Calcium
Chromium**
Cobalt
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Molybdenum
Potassium
Sod i urn
Tin
Titanium
Wastewaters  from  plants  6208,  2714,  4550  and 7781 were
examined for toxic pollutants.  No organic toxic  pollutants
were  found  except  1,2-diphenylhydrazine,  which was found
(200 ug/1) in one stream at plant 2714.  This  chemical  was
found  in the reverse osmosis permeate but was absent in the
reverse osmosis concentrate, raising  the  possibility  that
its presence in the permeate was an anomaly.  This pollutant
was  not  found  at  any  other plant.  The organic priority
pollutants were measured to a detectability limit of 20 ug/1
by gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer analysis.

Pesticides were found at low levels  at  four  of  the  five
plants.   Amounts  varied from the detection limit up to 1.6
ug/1.  Similar amounts of pesticides were also found in  the
incoming  water  supply  in  these plants.  The quantitation
limit for pesticides is 0.1 ug/1  with  the  instrumentation
used.   The  single  effluent streams from plants 6208, 4550
and 7781 and all three outfalls for plant 2714 were analyzed
for asbestos, but none was found.
                           VI-4

-------
The following  toxic  metals  were  not  found  above  their
detectable limits in plant effluents:

    Metal               Detectable Limit, mq/1

    Arsenic                       0.002
    Beryllium                     0.005
    Copper                        0.010
    Mercury                       0.0002
    Nickel                        0.020
    Selenium                      0.002
    Thallium                      0.100

Antimony and zinc were found in concentrations equivalent to
concentrations in incoming water supply or equal to, or less
than, current water quality criteria.

A  discussion  of  those  conventional  and  toxic pollutant
parameters which were found in significant quantity follows.
Table VI-4 lists these parameters.

                         TABLE VI-4
       Pollutants Found in Significant Quantities in
       Effluents from Photographic Processing Plants

Toxic              Conventional        Non-Conventional

Cadmium            pH                  Boron
Chromium           BOD                 Dissolved Solids
Cyanide, total     COD                 Hal ides
Lead                                   Iron
Si 1ver                                 Nitrogen, ammonia
                                       Phenols
                                       Sulfate
                                       TOC

DESCRIPTION OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS OF SIGNIFICANCE

LL.  POLLUTANT PROPERTIES

Acidity and Alkalinity -

Although not a specific pollutant,  pH   is  related  to  the
acidity  or  alkalinity of a wastewater stream.  It is not a
linear  or  direct  measure  of  either;,  however,  it  may
                           VI-5

-------
properly  be  used  as  a  surrogate  to control both excess
acidity and excess alkalinity in water.  The term pH is used
to describe the hydrogen  ion  -  hydroxyl  ion  balance  in
water.  Technically, pH is the hydrogen ion concentration or
activity  present  in  a given solution.  pH numbers are the
negative logarithm of the hydrogen ion concentration.  A  pH
of  7  generally  indicates  neutrality or a balance between
free hydrogen and free hydroxyl ions.  Solutions with  a  pH
above  7  indicate that the solution is alkaline, while a pH
below 7 indicates that the solution is acid.

Knowledge of the pH of water  or  wastewatet  is  useful  in
determining   necessary   measures  for  corrosion  control,
pollution control, and disinfection.  Waters with a pH below
6.0 are corrosive to water  works  structures,  distribution
lines,  and  household plumbing fixtures, and such corrosion
can add constituents to drinking water such as iron, copper,
zinc, cadmium, and lead.  Low pH waters  not  only  tend  to
dissolve  metals  from structures and fixtures but also tend
to redissolve  or  leach  metals  from  sludges  and  bottom
sediments.   The  hydrogen  ion concentration can affect the
"taste" of the water and at a low pH, water tastes "sour."

Extremes  of  pH  or  rapid  pH  changes  can  exert  stress
conditions  or  kill  aquatic  life outright.  Even moderate
changes  from  "acceptable"  criteria  limits  of   pH   are
deleterious  to  some  species.   The  relative toxicity* to
aquatic life of many materials is increased  by  changes  in
the  water  pH.   For  example,  metalocyanide complexes can
increase a thousandfold in toxicity with a drop  of  1.5  pH
units.   Similarly, the toxicity of ammonia is a function of
pH.  The bactericidal effect of chlorine in  most  cases  is
less   as   the   pH   increases,  and  it  is  economically
advantageous to keep the pH close to 7.

Photographic  processing  wastewaters  from  the  individual
processing  steps  are  both basic and acidic.  For example,
developers are basic and the  stop  and  fix  solutions  are
acidic.    When  waste  streams  from  these  solutions  are
combined in the plant discharge, the different streams  tend
to  neutralize each other.  Overall plant discharges in this
industry are generally in the pH range of 6 to 9  with  most
in the range of 7 to 8.5.
    The term toxic or toxicity is used herein in the normal
    scientific sense of the word and not as a specialized
    term referring to Section 307(a) of the Act.
                             VI-6

-------
Acidity is defined as the quantitative ability of a water to
neutralize  hydroxyl  ions.   It is usually expressed as the
calcium  carbonate   equivalent   of   the   hydroxyl   ions
neutralized.   Acidity should not be confused with pH value.
Acidity is the  quantity  of  hydrogen  ions  which  may  be
released  to react with or neutralize hydroxyl ions while pH
is a measure of the free hydrogen ions in a solution at  the
instant  the  pH  measurement  is  made.  A property of many
chemicals, called buffering, may hold  hydrogen  ions  in  a
solution  from being in the free state and being measured as
pH.  The bond of most buffers is rather weak,  and  hydrogen
ions  tend  to  be  released  from  the  buffer as needed to
maintain a fixed pH value.

Highly acid waters are corrosive to  metals,  concrete,  and
living organisms, exhibiting the pollutional characteristics
outlined  above  for  low pH waters.  Depending on buffering
capacity, water may have a higher total acidity at pH values
of 6.0 than other waters with a pH value of 4.0.

Alkalinity  is  defined  as  the  ability  of  a  water   to
neutralize  hydrogen  ions.   It is usually expressed as the
calcium  carbonate   equivalent   of   the   hydrogen   ions
neutralized.

Alkalinity  is commonly caused by the presence of carbonates,
bicarbonates,   hydroxides,  and  to  a  lesser  extent,  by
borates,  silicates,  phosphates,  and  organic  substances.
Because  of  the nature of the chemicals causing alkalinity,
and the buffering capacity of carbon dioxide in water,  very
high pH values are seldom found in natural waters.

Excess  alkalinity  as exhibited in a high pH value may make
water corrosive  to  certain  metals,  detrimental  to  most
natural organic materials, and toxic to living organisms.

Ammonia is more lethal with a higher pH.  The lacrimal fluid
of  the  human  eye  has  a  pH  of approximately 7.0, and  a
deviation of 0.1 pH unit from the norm  may  result  in  eye
irritation  for  the  swimmer.   Appreciable irritation will
cause severe pain.
                           VI-7

-------
Total Suspended Solids

Suspended  solids  include  both   organic   and   inorganic
materials.   The  inorganic compounds include sand, silt and
clay.  The  organic  fraction  includes  such  materials  as
grease,  oil,  tar, and animal and vegetable waste products.
These solids may settle out rapidly, and bottom deposits are
often a  mixture  of  both  organic  and  inorganic  solids.
Solids may be suspended in water for a time, and then settle
to  the  bed of the stream or lake.  These solids discharged
with  man's  wastes  may  be  inert,  slowly   biodegradable
materials,  or  rapidly  decomposable  substances.  While in
suspension, they increase the turbidity of the water, reduce
light penetration, and impair the photosynthetic activity of
aquatic plants.

Suspended solids in water  interfere  with  many  industrial
processes,  cause  foaming  in  boilers and incrustations on
equipment  exposed  to  such  water,   especially   as   the
temperature  rises.   They  are undesirable in process water
used in the manufacture of steel, in the  textile  industry,
in  laundries, in dyeing, and in cooling systems.  Solids in
suspension are aesthetically displeasing.  When they  settle
to  form sludge deposits on the stream or lake bed, they are
often  damaging  to  the  life  in  water.    Solids,   when
transformed to sludge deposits, may do a variety of damaging
things,  including  blanketing  the  stream  or lake bed and
thereby destroying  the  living  spaces  for  those  benthic
organisms  that would otherwise occupy the habitat.  When of
an organic nature, solids  use  a  portion  or  all  of  the
dissolved  oxygen  available in the area.  Organic materials
also serve as a food source for sludgeworms  and  associated
organisms.

Disregarding  any  toxic  effect  attributable to substances
leached out by water, suspended solids  may  kill  fish  and
shellfish  by  causing abrasive injuries and by clogging the
gills and respiratory passages  of  various  aquatic  fauna.
Indirectly,  suspended  solids  are inimical to aquatic life
because they screen out light, and they promote and maintain
the  development  of  noxious  conditions   through   oxygen
depletion.   This  results  in  the killing of fish and fish
food  organisms.     Suspended   solids   also   reduce   the
recreational value of the water.
                           VI-8

-------
Suspended   solids  are  not  normally  a  problem  in  this
industry.  However, suspended solids  are  generated  during
some  recovery  operations  such  as precipitation of silver
sulfide and ferro/ferricyanides.  These solids are sometimes
recovered for recovery of silver or reuse, respectively.

II. POLLUTANT MATERIALS

Ammonia (NH3)

Ammonium compounds are used in the photoprocessing  industry
as  constituents  in  some  fix,  bleach-fix, and stabilizer
solutions.   The  ammonium  ion  can  be  present  in  these
solutions at concentrations of 10 to 100 grams per liter and
be present in the plant effluent in concentrations up to 150
mg/1.

Ammonia  occurs  in surface and ground waters as a result of
the decomposition of nitrogenous organic matter.  It is  one
of  the  constituents of the complex nitrogen cycle.  It may
also  result  from  the  discharge  of  industrial   wastes.
Because  ammonia  may be indicative of pollution and because
it increases the chlorine demand,  it  is  recommended  that
ammonia  nitrogen  in public water supply sources not exceed
0.5 mg/1.

Ammonia exists in its non-ionized form  only  at  higher  pH
levels  and  is most toxic in this state.  The lower the pH,
the  more  ionized  ammonia  is  formed,  and  its  toxicity
decreases.  Ammonia, in the presence of dissolved oxygen, is
converted  to nitrate (N03) by nitrifying bacteria.  Nitrite
(N02), which is an intermediate product between ammonia  and
nitrate,  sometimes occurs in quantity when depressed oxygen
conditions permit.   Ammonia  can  exist  in  several  other
chemical  combinations including ammonium chloride and other
ammonia salts.

Nitrates  are  considered  to  be  among  the  objectionable
components  of  mineralized  waters.   Excess nitrates cause
irritation to the gastrointestinal tract,  causing  diarrhea
and  diuresis.  Methemoglobinemia, a condition characterized
by cyanosis which can result in infant  and  animal  deaths,
can  be caused by high nitrate concentrations in waters used
for feeding.   Evidence exists that ammonia  exerts  a  toxic
effect  on all aquatic life depending upon the pH, dissolved
                           VI-9

-------
oxygen level, and the total  ammonia  concentration  in  the
water.   A  significant  oxygen  demand  can result from the
microbial oxidation of ammonia.  Approximtely 4.5  grams  of
oxygen  are  required  for  every  gram  of  ammonia that is
oxidized.  Ammonia can add  to  eutrophication  problems  by
supplying  nitrogen  to aquatic life.  Ammonia can be toxic,
exerts an oxygen demand, and contributes to eutrophication.

Boron (B) Boron compounds, in the form of borates, are  used
in  developers, bleaches, and fixers in concentrations up to
one hundred grams per liter.  After mixing  of  the  various
waste  solutions,  the amount of boron in the plant effluent
generally ranges from 1 to 10 mg/1.

Never found in nature in its elemental form, boron occurs as
sodium borate  (borax) or as calcium borate  (colemanite)  in
mineral  deposits  and natural waters of Southern California
and Italy.  Elemental boron is used in nuclear installations
as a shielding material  (neutron absorber).  It is also used
in metallurgy to harden other metals.

Boric acid and boron salts are used extensively in  industry
for  such  purposes  as  weatherproof ing  wood, fireproofing
fabrics, manufacturing glass and  porcelain,  and  producing
leather,  carpets,  cosmetics,  and  artificial gems.  Boric
acid  is used as a bactericide and fungicide  and  boron,  in
the  form  of  boron  hydrides  or  borates, is used in high
energy fuels.

Boron is present in the ordinary human diet at about   10  to
20  mg/day,  with  fruits  and  vegetables being the largest
contributors.  In food  or  in  water,  it  is  rapidly  and
completely  absorbed  by  the  human  system, but it is also
promptly excreted in urine.  Boron  in drinking water is  not
generally  regarded  as  a  hazard  to  humans.   It has been
reported that  boron concentrations  up to  30  mg/1  are  not
harmful.
Bromide  (Br)

Bromides  are  derived from hydrobromic  acid  (HBr).   Bromide
properties are similar to those of   chlorides   and   iodides.
Bromides are usually produced  from  bromine, which  in turn  is
obtained from salt  brines or sea water.
                           VI-10

-------
Bromides  are used in medicine as sedatives in the treatment
of  nervous  disorders.     SiIver   bromide   is   used   in
photographic  films  and  paper,  and  bromide compounds are
present in the formulations of bleaches.

Cadmium (Cd)

Cadmium  occurs  in  some,  but  not   all   photoprocessing
facilities,  because  it is an ingredient in some sensitized
products.   The cadmium  compounds  are  at  least  partially
removed  during  the  development portion of the process and
are primarily found in the waste developer.

Cadmium is a relatively rare element that is seldom found in
sufficient quantities in a pure state to warrant  mining  or
extraction  from  the earth's surface.  It is found in trace
amounts  of  about  1  ppm  throughout  the  earth's  crust.
Cadmium   is,   however,   a  valuable  by-product  of  zinc
production.

Cadmium is used primarily as a metal  plating  material  and
can  be  found  as  an impurity in the secondary refining of
zinc, lead,  and  copper.   Cadmium  is  also  used  in  the
manufacture  of  primary  and  storage  batteries  and  as a
neutron adsorber in nuclear reactors.  Other uses of cadmium
are   in   the   production    of    pigments,    phosphors,
semi-conductors,  electrical conductors, and special purpose
low temperature alloys.

Cadmium  is  an  extremely  dangerous  cumulative  toxicant,
causing  insidious progressive chronic poisoning in mammals,
fish, and probably other animals because the  metal  is  not
excreted.    Cadmium could form organic compounds which might
lead to mutagenic or teratogenic effects.  Cadmium is  known
to   have  marked  acute  and  chronic  effects  on  aquatic
organisms also.

Toxic effects of cadmium on  man  have  been  reported  from
throughout  the  world.    Cadmium  is  normally  ingested by
humans through food and water  and  also  by  breathing  air
contaminated by cadmium.  Cadmium in drinking water supplies
is   extremely   hazardous   to   humans,  and  conventional
treatment, as practiced  in  the  United  States,  does  not
remove  it.   Cadmium  is  cumulative  in the liver, kidney,
pancreas,  and thyroid of humans and other animals.  A severe
                           VI-11

-------
bone and kidney syndrome in Japan has been  associated  with
the  ingestion  of  as little as 600 ng/day of cadmium.  The
allowable cadmium concentration in drinking water is set  as
low  as  0.01  mg/1  in the U.S. and as high as 0.10 mg/1 in
Russia.

Cadmium acts synergistically with other metals.  Copper  and
zinc   substantially  increase  its  toxicity.   Cadmium  is
concentrated  by  marine  organisms,  particularly  mollusks
which  accumulate  cadmium  in calcareous tissues and in the
viscera.  A concentration factor of  1,000  for  cadmium  in
fish muscle has been reported, as have concentration factors
of  3,000  in  marine  plants,  and  up to 29,600 in certain
marine animals.  The eggs and larvae of fish are  apparently
more  sensitive than adult fish to poisoning by cadmium, and
crustaceans appear to be more sensitive than fish  eggs  and
larvae.

Chlorides

Chlorides are found in practically all natural waters.  They
may  be:  (a)  of  natural  mineral origin or derived from a
sea-water contamination of underground supplies,  (b)  salts
spread  on  fields  for  agricultural purposes,  (c) human or
animal sewage, or  (d) industrial effluents,  such  as  those
from   paper  works,  galvanizing  plants,  water  softening
plants, oil wells, and petroleum refineries.

The human tolerance for chlorides varies  with   climate  and
exertion.   Chlorides lost through perspiration  are replaced
by chlorides  in either the diet or drinking water.  From hot
dry areas, there are reports  that chloride concentrations up
to  almost   900  mg/1  have   not  been  harmful.    Chloride
concentrations  of  1,500  mg/1  are reported  to be safe for
cattle, sheep, swine and  chickens.   Also,   2,000  mg/1  of
chloride has  been  reported as not harmful to  some fish.

Because   of   their  non-toxic  nature,   chlorides  are  not
selected   as  a   pollutant  parameter   requiring    the
establishment of a limitation.

Chromium  (Cr)

Sodium and   potassium dichromate are principal  constituents
of certain bleaches used primarily  in the color  movie  print
                            VI-12

-------
film  process.   These compounds in combination with bromide
ions oxidize the developed  silver  to  silver  bromide.   A
dichromate  bleach  may  also be used in the black and white
reversal process.  Again, the primary application  for  this
process is in the movie industry.

Chromium  is  an elemental metal usually found as a chromite
(FeCrgO*).  The metal is normally processed by reducing  the
oxide  with  aluminum.   Chromium and its compounds are used
extensively throughout industry.  It is used to harden steel
and as an ingredient in other useful  alloys.   Chromium  is
also  used  in  the electroplating industry as an ornamental
and corrosion resistant plating on steel and can be used  in
pigments  and as a pickling acid (chromic acid).  It is used
in certain chromate bleaches in the photographic  processing
industry.

The  two  most  prevalent  chromium  forms found in industry
wastewaters   are   hexavalent   and   trivalent   chromium.
Dichromate  compounds  used  in  the photographic processing
industry  are  hexavalent  chromium  compounds   which   are
partially   reduced   to  the  trivalent  form  during  use.
Chromium  can  exist  as  either  trivalent  or   hexavalent
compounds  in  raw  waste  streams,  although  most  of  the
hexavalent chromium is reduced to the  trivalent  form  when
mixed    with    other   photographic   processing   wastes,
particularly sulfites and thiosulfates.  Hexavalent chromium
treatment involves reduction to the trivalent form prior  to
removal  of  chromium  from  the waste stream as a hydroxide
precipitate.

Chromium, in its various valence  states,  is  hazardous  to
man.    It  can  produce lung tumors when inhaled and induces
skin  sensitizations.    Large  doses   of   chromates   have
corrosive  effects  on  the  intestinal  tract and can cause
inflammation of the kidneys.  Levels of chromate  ions  that
have  no  effect  on  man appear to be so low as to prohibit
determination to date.  The recommendation for public  water
supplies  is  that  such  supplies contain no more than 0.05
mg/1  total chromium.

THe toxicity of chromium salts to  fish  and  other  aquatic
life  varies  widely  with  the  species,  temperature,  pH,
valence of the  chromium  and  synergistic  or  antagonistic
effects,  especially those of hard water.   Studies have shown
                           VI-13

-------
that  trivalent chromium is more toxic to fish of some types
than hexavalent chromium.  Other studies have shown opposite
effects.  Fish food  organisms  and  other  lower  forms  of
aquatic  life  are  extremely  sensitive to chromium, and it
also  inhibits  the  growth  of  algae.    Therefore,   both
hexavalent and trivalent chromium must be considered harmful
to particular fish or organisms.

Chromium  is  not destroyed when treated by a POTW (although
the oxidation state may change), and either  passes  through
to  the  POTW  effluent  or  is  incorporated  into the POTW
sludge.  Both oxidation  states  can  cause  POTW  treatment
inhibition  and  can  also limit the usefulness of municipal
sludge.  Hexavalent and trivalent chromium both cause  toxic
effects  in  a  wide  variety of organisms including aquatic
species and humans.  Chromium which passes  through  a  POTW
becomes  a potential drinking and bathing water contaminant.
Hexavalent chromium is a  known  human  carcinogen,  and  is
generally  the more toxic of the two oxidation states.  As a
result  of  these  considerations,   chromium   pretreatment
standards  must  be  the  same  as discharge limitations for
direct discharge.

Cyanide 
-------
concentrations of the ferrocyanide ion resulted in a  96-hour
LCSO value of greater than  100 ppm.   (The 96-hour LC50 value
is the chemical concentration that will cause a  50   percent
mortality  of  the test species after the 96-hour exposure.)
Similar tests with lower forms  of  aquatic  life  did  show
greater  sensitivity,  i.e., 96-hour LCSO values of 0.1 to  1
ppm for crustaceans  (Daphnia magna)  and  algae  growth  was
inhibited at ferrocyanide concentrations of  1 to 10 ppm.  It
has   been   shown   that   the  hexacyanoferrate  ions  are
photochemically active and  readily release the  cyanide  ion
with  sunlight  exposure.   Bioassay  tests  with 8,000 foot
candles of simulated sunlight resulted in 50 percent  minnow
fatalities  in  about  five hours at a 100 ppm ferrocyanide
concentration.  This photochemical effect is of concern  for
those facilities which use  ferricyanide bleach and discharge
the wastewater directly to  surface waters.

The  large  majority of photoprocessing facilities discharge
to POTW's.  Laboratory and  on-site  treatment  plant  tests
have  shown  that the hexacyanoferrate ions cause no  adverse
effects on the  biomass  and  are  resistant  to  biological
degradation.   The  treatment  plant  removal efficiency was
reported   to   be   greater   than   60    percent.     The
hexacyanoferrate  ions  are probably  precipitated   in  the
presence of iron, zinc, or  calcium  ions  and  are  combined
with the waste sludge.

Land  disposal is a common  disposal method for POTW sludges.
The  fate  of  the  hexacyanoferrates  under  land  disposal
conditions  has  been  evaluated  with leachate tests in the
laboratory.  Such tests were performed  using  several  soil
types  and  several  test   sludges  ranging in total  cyanide
content from 9 to 37,000 mg/kg (dry basis).   Evaluation  of
the  elutriate  showed  no  release,  and column tests showed
that the hexacyanoferrates  were released from the sludge  in
particulate   form   and  were  bound  within  the  soil  by
adsorption and filtration.

Of all the cyanides,  hydrogen cyanide (HCN) is probably  the
most  acutely  lethal compound.   HCN dissociates in water to
hydrogen ions and cyanide ions in a pH  dependent  reaction.
The  cyanide  ion  is  less  acutely  lethal  than HCN.   The
relationship of pH to HCN shows that as the pH is lowered to
below 7,  there  is  less  than  1   percent  of  the  cyanide
molecules  in the form of the CN ion and the rest is present
                           VI-15

-------
as HCN.  When the pH is increased  to  8,  9,  and  10,  the
percentage  of  cyanide  present as CN ion is 6.7, 42 and 87
percent, respectively.  The toxicity  of  cyanides  is  also
increased  by  increases  in  temperature  and reductions in
oxygen tensions.   A temperature rise of  10°C produced a  two
to  threefold  increase  in the rate of  the lethal action of
cyanide.

In the body, the CN ion, except for a small portion exhaled,
is rapidly  changed  into  a  relatively  non-toxic  complex
(thiocyanate)  in  the  liver  and  eliminated in the urine.
There  is no evidence that the CN ion is  stored in the  body.
The  safe  ingested  limit  of cyanide has been estimated at
something less than 18 mg/day,  part  of  which  comes  from
normal  environment  and  industrial  exposure.  The average
fatal  dose of HCN by ingestion by man is 50 to  60  mg.   It
has been recommended that a limit of 0.2 mg/1 cyanide not be
exceeded in public water supply sources.

The  harmful  effects, of  the  cyanides on aquatic life are
affected by the pH, temperature, dissolved  oxygen  content,
and  the  concentration  of  minerals  in  the  water.   The
biochemical  degradation  of  cyanide  is  not  affected  by
temperature  in the range of 10°C to 35°C while the toxicity
of HCN is increased at higher temperatures.

On lower forms of life and organisms, cyanide does not  seem
to  be as  toxic  as it is toward  fish.  The organisms that
digest BOD were found to be inhibited at 1.0 mg/1 and  at  60
mg/1 although the effect is more one of  delay  in  exertion of
BOD than total reduction.

Dissolved Solids

In   natural   waters,   the  dissolved   solids   are   mainly
carbonates, chlorides, sulfates, phosphates, and  to a  lesser
extent,  ni'trates  of  calcium,   magnesium,   sodium,    and
potassium,   with  traces  of   iron,  manganese,  and   other
substances.   The  summation  of  all   individual  dissolved
solids is commonly referred to  as total  dissolved solids.

Many communities  in  the United  States and in other countries
use  water  supplies  containing   2,000   to  4,000  mg/1  of
dissolved salts,  when no better water   is available.    Such
waters  are   not  palatable,  may not quench thirst,  and  may
                            VI-16

-------
have a laxative action on new users.  Waters containing more
than 4,000 mg/1 of  total  salts  are  generally  considered
unfit  for  human  use, although in hot climates such higher
salt concentrations can  be  tolerated.   Waters  containing
5,000  mg/1  or  more are reported to be bitter and act as a
bladder and intestinal irritant.   It  is  generally  agreed
that  the salt concentration of good, palatable water should
not exceed 500 mg/1.

Limiting concentrations of dissolved solids for  fresh-water
fish  may  range  from  5,000  to  10,000 mg/1, depending on
species and prior acclimatization.  Some fish are adapted to
living  in  more  saline  waters,  and  a  few  species   of
fresh-water  forms  have been found in natural waters with a
salt concentration of  15,000  to  20,000  mg/1.   Fish  can
slowly become acclimatized to higher salinities, but fish in
waters  of  low  salinity  cannot survive sudden exposure to
high salinities, such as those resulting from discharges  of
oil   well  brines.   Dissolved  solids  may  influence  the
toxicity of heavy metals and organic compounds to  fish  and
other  aquatic  life,  primarily because of the antagonistic
effect of hardness on metals.

Waters with  total  dissolved  solids  (TDS)  concentrations
higher  than  500 mg/1 have decreasing utility as irrigation
water.  At 5,000 mg/1, water has  little  or  no  value  for
irrigation.

Dissolved  solids in industrial water uses can cause foaming
in boilers and can  cause  interferences  with  cleanliness,
color,   or   taste   of   many   finished  products.   High
concentrations of dissolved solids also tend  to  accelerate
corrosion.   Most  of  the solids present in photoprocessing
wastewater are dissolved.

Specific conductance is a measure of the capacity  of  water
to  convey an electric current.  This property is related to
the total concentration of ionized substances in  water  and
to  the water temperature.  This property is frequently used
as a substitute method of quickly estimating  the  dissolved
solids concentration.
                           VI-17

-------
Iron (Fe)

Iron  is  an abundant metal found in the earth's crust.  The
most common iron ore is hematite from which iron is obtained
by reduction with carbon.  Other forms  of  commercial  ores
are magnetite and taconite.  Pure iron is not often found in
commercial  use, but it is usually alloyed with other metals
and minerals, the most common being carbon.

Iron is the basic element in the  production  of  steel  and
steel alloys.  Iron with carbon is used for casting of major
parts of machines, and it can be machined, cast, formed, and
welded.  Ferrous iron is used in paints, while powdered iron
can  be  sintered  and  used  in  powder  metallurgy.   Iron
compounds are also used  to  precipitate  other  metals  and
undesirable  minerals  from  industrial  wastewater streams.
The dissolved iron present  in  photoprocessing  wastewaters
comes   from  two  sources.   Iron  compounds  are  used  as
bleaches, and  iron  is  added  to  wastewater  by  metallic
replacement silver recovery processes.

Iron   is  chemically  reactive  and  corrodes rapidly  in the
presence of moist air  and  at  elevated   temperatures.   In
water  and  in the presence of oxygen, the  resulting products
of  iron  corrosion  may   be  pollutants   in  water.   Natural
pollution   occurs  from  the  leaching of  soluble  iron salts
from   soil  and  rocks   and  is   increased   by    industrial
wastewater   from   pickling   baths   and  other  solutions
containing  iron  salts.

Corrosion products  of   iron  in  water   cause  staining  of
porcelain fixtures, and  ferric  iron  combines with  the  tannin
to  produce a dark violet color.  The presence of excessive
iron  in  water discourages  cows   from  drinking  and,   thus,
reduces  milk production.  High  concentrations  of  ferric  and
ferrous  ions in  water  kill  most fish   introduced   to  the
solution   within   a   few  hours.    The   killing   action   is
attributed  to coatings of  iron  hydroxide precipitates  on  the
gills.   Iron oxidizing bacteria  are   dependent  on  iron   in
water   for   growth.    These  bacteria   form  slimes  that  can
affect the  aesthetic  values  of  bodies   of  water   and   cause
stoppage of flows  in  pipes.

 Iron   is  an essential   nutrient  and  micronutrient for  all
forms  of growth.  Drinking water standards in the  U.S.  have
                            VI-18

-------
 set  a  recommended  limit   of   0.3  mg/1  of  iron in domestic
 water   supplies   based   not     on   the     physiological
 considerations,    but   rather    on    aesthetic   and   taste
 considerations  of  iron  in water.

 Lead  (Pb)

 Lead  is  used  in various solid forms  both  as  a  pure metal  and
 in  several  compounds.   Lead appears  in some  natural waters,
 especially  in   those  areas where  mountain   limestone  and
 galena are  found.   Lead can also  be  introduced  into   water
 from   lead  pipes   by  the   action of  the water on the  lead.
 Lead  is  not knowingly added to process wastewater  in  this
 industry.

 Lead   is a  toxic  material  that  is foreign to humans  and
 animals.  The most  common form of  lead poisoning  is  called
 plumbism.   Lead  can  be  introduced  into the body from  the
 atmosphere  containing lead  or from  food  and   water.   Lead
 cannot be easily excreted and is  cumulative  in the body over
 long  periods  of  time, eventually  causing  lead  poisoning with
 the  ingestion   of  an excess of 0.6  mg per day over a period
 of  years.   It has been  recommended that 0.05 mg/1   lead  not
 be  exceeded in public water  supply sources.
   nn^o  1^?d P°isonin9 has occurred among animals at levels
   0.18 mg/1 of lead in soft  water  and  by  concentrations
under  2.4 mg/1 in hard water.  Farm animals are poisoned by
lead more frequently than any other poison.  Sources of this
occurrence include paint and water with the lead in solution
as well as in suspension.  Each year thousands of wild water
fowl are poisoned from lead shot  that  is  discharged  over
feeding areas and ingested by the water fowl.  The bacterial

                            matter  is  inhibited by leadat
Fish and other marine life have  had  adverse  effects  from
lead and salts in their environment.  Experiments have shown
that  small  concentrations  of  heavy metals, especially of
lead, have caused a film of coagulated mucus to  form  first
over  the  gills  and  then  over  the  entire body probably
causing suffocation  of  the  fish.    Toxicity  of  lead  is
increased with a reduction of dissolved oxygen concentration
in the water.
                           VI-19

-------
Phenols

Phenols,  defined  as hydroxy derivatives of benzene and its
condensed nuclei,  may  occur  in  domestic  and  industrial
wastewater  and in drinking water supplies.  Chlorination of
such  waters  can  produce  odoriferous  and   objectionable
tasting chlorophenols.

Although  described  in  the  technical literature simply as
phenols, the phenol waste category can include a wide  range
of  similar  chemical  compounds.   In  terms  of  pollution
control, reported concentrations of phenols are  the  result
of  a standard methodology which measures a general group of
similar compounds rather  than  being  based  upon  specific
identification  of  the  single  compound,  phenol (hydroxy-
benzene).  Some of the  compounds  used  in  photoprocessing
which  might  be  identified  as phenols will not respond to
standard analytical tests for  phenols  and  do  not  impart
taste to water after chlorination.

Phenols  are used in some cutting oils and in the molding of
plastics.  Cutting fluids  can  contain  phenolic  compounds
since these materials are normal constituents of hydrocarbon
mixtures.  In addition, phenolic compounds are added to oils
as  preservatives  or for odor control.  They also are found
in  the wastewaters from  the  petroleum  industry  and  from
certain products of the organic chemical industry.

Phenolic  compounds  may  adversely affect fish  in two ways:
first, by a direct toxic action, and second, by  imparting   a
taste  to  the   fish  flesh.  The toxicity of phenol towards
fish increases as the dissolved oxygen level is  diminished,
as  the  temperature  is  raised,  and  as   the  hardness  is
lessened.  Phenol appears to  act as a nerve  poison  causing
too much  blood to get to the gills and to  the  heart cavity
and is reported  to have a toxic  threshold  of 0.1-15 mg/1.

Mixed  phenolic   substances   appear   to  be    especially
troublesome   in  imparting taste  to fish flesh.   Chlorophenol
produces a bad taste  in  fish far  below   lethal  or   toxic
doses.   Threshold  concentrations  for   taste   or  odor   in
chlorinated water supplies have   been  reported  as   low   as
0.00001-0.001  mg/1.   Phenols  in  concentrations of only  one
part per billion have been known  to affect water supplies.
                            VI-20

-------
 The ingestion of concentrated solutions of phenol  by  humans
 results   in  severe  pain,   renal   irritation,   shock,   and
 possibly death.   A total  dose of 1.5  grams  may  be  fatal
 Phenols  can  be metabolized and oxidized in waste treatment
 facilities containing  organisms  acclimated  to   the  phenol
 concentration in the wastes.

 Silver  (Ag)

 The  emulsion  on  photographic film and paper contains  as a
 principal  ingredient various silver  halides  which  form or
 assist   in  the  formation of the photographic image.   During
 processing a portion (black   and white  materials)   or   all
 (color  materials)  of the  silver is removed from  the  emulsion
 by   the  fix  solution.    A  principal  constituent  of  the fix
 solution is  the  thiosulfate  ion which  forms a complex  with
 silver.    The silver thiosulfate complex is stable (it has a
 dissociation constant  of  3.5  x  lO-»*)  and non-toxic  to  fish
 (bioassay   test  showed no effect on  fathead minnows  after 96
 hours of exposure  to  the  silver   thiosulfate  complex at
 concentrations up to 50 mg/1  as silver).

 Since   the  large  majority   of the  photoprocessing  industry
 discharges to POTW's,  the major concern is the fate   of   the
 complex  after secondary  treatment.  Studies have  shown  that
 the secondary treatment microorganisms  convert   the   complex
 to  silver  sulfide  and  some metallic  silver,  most of which is
 removed  from the  wastewater  stream by settling.  The  portion
 that    remains with   the wastewater   exists  as  colloidal
 suspensions   of   silver   sulfide and   silver  and  a sma1!
 fraction  of  soluble  ionic   silver.    Silver  sulfide is
 insoluble  under normal environmental  conditions.   Bioassay
 tests  have   shown   it  to be  non-toxic  to  fathead minnows.
 Dynamic  96-hour LCSO tests  for  silver   sulfide  showed no
 fatalities   at  a  maximum total silver  concentration  of  250
 ppm.

 The silver sulfide and silver that settles  is  removed   from
 the  treatment  plant  as  a constituent of the sludge.   Land
 disposal  by   landspreading  or  landfill ing  is  a    common
 disposal  method  for  POTW  sludges.   Laboratory  leachate
 testing on test sludges containing silver  in  concentrations
 from 19 to 83,000 mg/kg (dry) showed no release of silver to
 the  elutriate.   Column  tests  indicated that the silver was
effectively bound by the  various soil types.
                           VI-21

-------
Silver is a soft, lustrous white metal that is insoluble  in
water and alkali.  It is readily ionized by electrolysis and
has  a  particular affinity for sulfur and halogen elements.
In nature, silver  is  found  in  the  elemental  state  and
combined  in  ores  such  as  argentite  (Ag2S), horn silver
(AgCl), proustite (Ag3AsS3), and pyrargyrite (Ag3SbS3).

From these ores, silver ions  may  be  leached  into  ground
waters  and surface waters, but since many silver salts such
as  the  chloride,  sulfide,  phosphate,  and  arsenate  are
insoluble,  silver  ions do not usually occur in significant
concentration in natural waters.

Silver is used extensively  in  electroplating,  photographic
supplies   manufacture,  electrical  equipment  manufacture,
soldering and brazing, and  battery manufacture.   Of  these,
the  two major sources of silver wastes are the photographic
and electroplating industries with about 30 percent of  U.S.
industrial consumption of silver going into the photographic
industry.   Silver is also  used in its basic metal state for
such items as jewelry and electrical contacts.

Silver compounds can be absorbed in the  circulatory  system
and  reduced  silver deposited  in the various tissues of the
body.  A  condition known as argyria,  a  permanent  greyish
pigmentation  of  the skin  and  mucous membranes,  can result.
Concentrations  in  the  range   of  0.4-1  mg/1  have   caused
pathologic changes in the  kidneys, liver and  spleen of  rats.

Silver   is  recognized  as  a bactericide, and  doses as  low  as
0.000001  to 0.5  mg/1 have  been  reported  as  sufficient   to
sterilize water.

Sulfates

Sulfates  occur   naturally  in  waters,  particularly  in  the
western  United  States,  as  a result of  leachings from   gypsum
and   other  common   materials.  They  also  occur as  the final
oxidized  state   of   sulfides,   sulfites,   and  thiosulfates.
Sulfates  may  also   be  present   as   the   oxidized  state of
organic  matter  in the  sulfur cycle,  but  they  in  turn  may
serve  as  sources  of  energy for  sulfate splitting  bacteria.
Sulfates  may   also   be   discharged  in  numerous  industrial
wastes,   such  as  those  from tanneries,  sulfate-pulp mills,
 textile  mills,   and  other  plants   that   use  sulfates  or
                            VI-22

-------
sulfuric   acid.    Thiosulfates  occur  in  photoprocessing
wastewater as part of the fix.

In moderate concentrations, sulfates are not harmful, and it
has been reported that concentrations up to 1,000  mg/1  are
harmless.   Irrigation concentrations less than 336 mg/1 are
considered to be good to excellent.

Because of their relatively harmless  nature,  sulfates  are
not   selected   as  a  pollutant  parameter  requiring  the
establishment of a limitation.

Oxygen Demand (BOD, COD, and TOO

Oxygen Demand

Organic and some inorganic compounds  can  cause  an  oxygen
demand   to  be  exerted  in  a  receiving  body  of  water.
Indigenous microorganisms utilize the organic wastes  as  an
energy  source  and oxidize the organic matter.  In doing so
their  natural  respiratory  activity   will   utilize   the
dissolved oxygen.

Dissolved  oxygen  (DO)  in  water  is  a  quality  that, in
appropriate concentrations, is essential not  only  to  keep
organisms  living  but also to sustain species reproduction,
vigor,  and  the  development  of  populations.    Organisms
undergo  stress at reduced DO concentrations that makes them
less competitive and less  able  to  sustain  their  species
within  the  aquatic  environment.   For example, reduced DO
concentrations  have  been  shown  to  interfere  with  fish
population  through  delayed  hatching of eggs, reduced size
and vigor of embryos, production of  deformities  in  young,
interference  with  food  digestion,  acceleration  of blood
clotting, decreased tolerance to certain toxicants,  reduced
food   utilization  efficiency,  growth  rate,  and .maximum
sustained swimming  speed.    Other  organisms  are  likewise
affected adversely during conditions of decreased DO.  Since
all  aerobic  aquatic  organisms  need  a  certain amount of
oxygen,  the consequences of  total  depletion  of  dissolved
oxygen  due  to  a  high  oxygen  demand  can  kill  all the
inhabitants of the affected aquatic area.

It  has  been  shown  that  fish  may,  under  some  natural
conditions,    become    acclimatized    to    low    oxygen
                           VI-23

-------
concentrations.  Within  certain  limits,  fish  can  adjust
their  rate  of respiration to compensate for changes in the
concentration of dissolved oxygen.  It is generally  agreed,
moreover,  that those species which are sluggish in movement
(e.g.,  carp,  pike,  eel)  can   withstand   lower   oxygen
concentrations  than  fish  which  are  more lively in habit
(such as trout or salmon).

The lethal effect of low concentrations of dissolved  oxygen
in  water  appears  to be increased by the presence of toxic
substances, such as ammonia, cyanides, zinc,  lead,  copper,
or  cresols.  With so many factors influencing the effect of
oxygen deficiency, it is difficult to estimate  the  minimum
safe  concentrations  at  which  fish will be unharmed under
natural conditions.  Many investigations  seem  to  indicate
that  a DO level of 5.0 mg/1 is desirable for a good aquatic
environment and higher DO levels are required  for  selected
types of aquatic environments.

Biochemical oxygen demand is the quantity of oxygen required
for  the  biological  and  chemical  oxidation of waterborne
substances under  ambient  or  test  conditions.   Materials
which  may  contribute  to  the  BOD  include:  carbonaceous
organic  materials  usable  as  a  food  source  by  aerobic
organisms;   oxidizable   nitrogen  derived  from  nitrites,
ammonia, and organic nitrogen compounds which serve as   food
for  specific  bacteria;  and  certain chemically oxidizable
materials such as ferrous iron, sulfides, and sulfite  which
will react with dissolved oxygen or which are metabolized by
bacteria.   In most  industrial and municipal wastewaters, the
BOD  derives  principally  from  organic  materials and  from
ammonia  (which is itself derived from  animal  or  vegetable
matter).

The  BOD  of  a  waste  exerts  an  adverse  effect upon the
dissolved oxygen resources of a body of  water  by  reducing
the  oxygen available to  fish, plant  life, and other aquatic
species.    Conditions  can  be  reached  where  all  of  the
dissolved   oxygen   in  the  water   is  utilized resulting  in
anaerobic  conditions and  the production  of undesirable  gases
such as  hydrogen sulfide  and  methane.   The  reduction of
dissolved   oxygen   can  be  detrimental  to fish populations,
fish  growth rate, and organisms used  as  fish food.  A   total
lack   of   oxygen due to the exertion  of  an excessive BOD can
                            VI-24

-------
result in the death of all aerobic  aquatic  inhabitants  in
the affected area.

Water  with a high BOD indicates the presence of decomposing
organic   matter   and   associated   increased    bacterial
concentrations  that degrade its quality and potential uses.
A by-product of high BOD  concentrations  can  be  increased
algal   concentrations   and   blooms   which   result  from
decomposition of the organic matter and which form the basis
of algal populations.

The BOD5 (5-day BOD) test is used  widely  to  estimate  the
pollutional  strength  of  domestic and industrial wastes in
terms of the oxygen that they  will  require  if  discharged
into  receiving  streams.   The  test is an important one in
water  pollution  control  activities.   It  is   used   for
pollution  control  regulatory  activities,  to evaluate the
designs and efficiencies of wastewater treatment works,  and
to  indicate  the  state  of  purification  or  pollution of
receiving bodies of water.

Complete biochemical oxidation of a given waste may  require
a  period  of  incubation  too long for practical analytical
test purposes.  For this reason, the 5-day period  has  been
accepted  as  standard,  and  the  test  results  have  been
designated as BODS.  Specific chemical test methods are  not
readily   available  for  measuring  the  quantity  of  many
degradable substances and their reaction products.  Reliance
in such cases is placed on the collective  parameter,  BODS,
which  measures  the  weight of dissolved oxygen utilized by
microorganisms  as  they  oxidize  or  transform  the  gross
mixture  of  chemical  compounds  in  the  wastewater.   The
biochemical reactions involved in the  oxidation  of  carbon
compounds  are  related  to  the  period of incubation.  The
five-day BOD normally measures only 60 to 80 percent of  the
carbonaceous  biochemical  oxygen  demand of the sample, and
for  many  purposes  this   is   a   reasonable   parameter.
Additionally,  it can be used to estimate the gross quantity
of oxidizable organic matter.

The BOD5 test is  essentially  a  bioassay  procedure  which
provides   an   estimate   of   the   oxygen   consumed   by
microorganisms utilizing the degradable matter present in  a
waste under conditions that are representative of those that
are likely to occur in nature.  Standard conditions of time,
                           VI-25

-------
temperature,  suggested  microbial  seed, and dilution water
for the wastes have been defined and are incorporated in the
standard analytical procedure.   Through  the  use  of  this
procedure,  the  oxygen  demand  of  diverse  wastes  can be
compared and evaluated for pollution potential and  to  some
extent for treatability by biological treatment processes.

Because  the  BOD  test  is  a  bioassay  procedure,  it  is
important that the environmental conditions of the  test  be
suitable   for   the   microorganisms   to  function  in  an
uninhibited manner at all  times.   This  means  that  toxic
substances  must be absent and that the necessary nutrients,
such as nitrogen, phosphorus, and trace  elements,  must  be
present.

Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)

Chemical  oxygen  demand is a purely chemical oxidation test
devised as an  alternate  method  of  estimating  the  total
oxygen  demand  of a wastewater.  Since the method relies on
the oxidation-reduction system of chemical  analyses  rather
than  on  biological  factors, it is more precise, accurate,
and rapid than the BOD test.  The COD test is widely used to
estimate the total oxygen demand (ultimate rather than 5-day
BOD) to oxidize the compounds in a wastewater.  It is  based
on  the  fact that organic compounds, with a few exceptions,
can be oxidized by strong chemical  oxidizing  agents  under
acid  conditions  with  the  assistance of certain inorganic
catalysts.

The COD test measures the oxygen demand  of  compounds  that
are  biologically  degradable  and  of  many  that  are not.
Pollutants which are measured  by  the  BODS  test  will  be
measured by the COD test.  In addition, pollutants which are
more resistant to biological oxidation will also be measured
as  COD.   COD  is a more inclusive measure of oxygen demand
than is BOD5 and will result in higher oxygen demand  values
than will the BOD5 test.

The   compounds  which  are  more  resistant  to  biological
oxidation are becoming of greater and  greater  concern  not
only  because  of their slow but continuing oxygen demand on
the resources of the receiving water, but  also  because  of
their  potential  health effects on aquatic life and humans.
Many of these compounds result  from  industrial  discharges
                           VI-26

-------
 and  some have been found  to  have carcinogenic,  mutagenic and
 similar   adverse  effects,   either  singly or in combination.
 concern  about these compounds  has increased as  a  result  of
 demonstrations that their long life in  receiving water  - the
 result of a  slow biochemical oxidation  rate - allows  them to
 contaminate   downstream   water  intakes.    The  commonly used
 systems  of water purification  are not effective in removing
 these    types   of   materials,   and disinfection such  as
 chlorination may  convert them   into   even  more  hazardous
 materials.

 Thus  the COD  test  measures  organic matter which exerts an
 oxygen demand and which may  affect  the  health of the  public.
 It..1?4_.a useful  analytical  tool for   pollution  control
 activities.    It  provides   a  more rapid measurement of the
 oxygen demand and an  estimate  of organic  compounds which are
 not measured in  the BODS  test.
      organic  carbon  (TOO   is  measured   by   the  catalytic
conversion  of  organic  carbon   in  a  wastewater to carbon
dioxide.  Most organic  chemicals  have  been   found  to   be
measured  quantitatively  by  the equipment now in use.  The
time of analyses  is short, from 5 to 1 0 minutes,  permitting
a  rapid and accurate estimate of the organic  carbon content
of the  wastewaters  to  be  made  by  relatively  unskilled
personnel .

A  TOC  value does not indicate the rate at which the carbon
compounds are oxidized in the natural environment.  The  TOC
test  will  measure compounds that are readily  biodegradable
and measured by the BOD5 test as well as those  that are not.
TOC  analyses  will  include  those  biologically  resistant
SJS3"1^ conjPoun<*s  that  are of concern in the environment.
BOD  and  COD  methods  of  analyses  are  based  on  oxygen
utilization  of  the  wastewater.   The TOC analyses estimate
the total carbon content of a wastewater.  There is  as  yet
no  fundamental  correlation  of  TOC  to either BOD or COD
However, where organic laden wastewaters are fairly uniform,
  SrJUU       a fairlv constant correlation among  TOC,   BOD
and COD.  Once such a correlation is established, TOC can be
used as an inexpensive test for routine process monitoring.
                           VI-27

-------

-------
                        SECTION VII


             CONTROL AND TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES


Thus   far,   the   Photoprocesstng   Industry   has    been
characterized  with  regard  to  processes  used, water use,
wastes generated, pollutants of concern, in-process  control
technologies   used,   end-of-pipe   treatment  technologies
employed,  effluent  quality,   and   wastewater   discharge
destinations.   This  section  discusses the extent to which
the current  use  of  in-process  controls  and  end-of-pipe
treatments  by  this  industry  reduces pollutant discharge.
Other technologies that are either being considered  or  are
possibly   applicable   for   the  treatment  of  wastewater
generated by photoprocessors are also discussed.

IN-PROCESS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES

The control technologies  employed  by  the  photoprocessing
industry  are  described  in  detail  in Section III of this
document.  These consist of process modifications to  reduce
discharge  of expensive materials such as silver and complex
cyanide salts.  Although these practices are used  primarily
for  resource  recovery,  their  use  results in a secondary
benefit  of  reducing  the   pollutant   load   in   process
wastewater.

Recovery and Regeneration Processes

An estimate of the extent of use of some in-process controls
and  treatments  currently  used in the industry is shown in
Table VII-1.
As shown in Table VII-1, most of the facilities in the  four
largest   size  categories  recover  silver  and  regenerate
ferricyanide bleach.  It is also estimated  that  a  similar
proportion  of  the  facilities regenerate their ferric EDTA
bleach and bleach-fix.  Recovery of silver from  wash  water
using ion exchange or reverse osmosis is practiced by only a
relatively  small  number of the larger facilities.  An even
smaller number of facilities regenerate other solutions such
as developers and prewashes.  Most facilities which  process
                           VII-1

-------
•^ i
a K
     o  o   o  o
     o  o  o  o  o
     o  o  o
     00005
            B)  N  O
     *   S  S  8
         g  e  s  a
         W  ffl  N
      
-------
 color   reversal   (DC)   film  recover  and reuse  color  couplers
 from the developers.    The   following  sections   give   brief
 accounts  of  both  bleach   regeneration and silver  recovery
 techniques  in current  use and present  information on   their
 capability   of   reducing  wastewater  loadings.   Developer
 regeneration  and coupler   recovery  result   in   potential
 reduction   of  TOC  in the  raw  waste.   For those plants
 processing  color paper   containing   cadmium   compounds,
 developer   regeneration also has  the potential for reduction
 of  cadmium in   the   raw  waste.    Insufficient  data   are
 available to quantify  this reduction.

    Bleach  Regeneration

 Bleach  regeneration   is  used  in the industry to reprocess
 ferricyanide bleach,   EDTA   bleach   and  bleach-fixes.   The
 environmental   benefits   of  using  these  techniques are
 discussed below.

 Tables  VII-2 through VII-4 show the  environmental   benefits
 of   ferricyanide bleach  regeneration  and   summarize the
 combined data obtained during the study.  The  data presented
 in these tables and the succeeding tables  in  this  section
 have  been  extracted   from  the data tables in Section  V and
 grouped according to the  indicated  plant  characteristics.
 Some  of  the  plants,  for which cyanide values are  given in
 the Section V effluent  data  tables,   are  not included  in
 Tables  VII-2 through  VII-4.  The available information from
 the  plants  not  included   was  insufficient  to allow   a
 determination  of  the  particular bleach treatment category.
 The production normalized total cyanide values reported are
 based   on   the  areas  of product processed with ferricyanide
 bleaches.   These  data  are   plotted   as    a   cumulative
 distribution  in  Figures  VII-1  through VI1-3.  Cumulative
 distribution plots are  used  here to  show trends or   grouping
 of  data.  Sudden changes in slope or discontinuities in the
 data displayed in such  a plot indicate that the data  groups
may belong to different populations.

Considerably lower total cyanide effluent levels  result from
 the  use  of  regeneration  methods.   An additional benefit
results in the treatment of  the waste fix by ferrous sulfate
 (FeS04) precipitation as shown in Table VII-4.   It should be
noted that the  fix  waste   is  treated  and  discharged  in
batches   at   the   listed  plants.    The  plant  effluents
                           VII-3

-------
represented in Table VII-4 do not contain any treated  waste
fix  batches.    However,  data  taken  from plant 4550's fix
blowdown indicate that the  treated  waste  contributes  0.9
percent of the total cyanide waste load.  The processing and
controls  used  in  all  plants  listed  in  the  table  are
comparable to 4550.

EDTA based bleach fixes  are  also  regenerated  within  the
industry.   The benefits here are similar to those described
earlier for the ferricyanide bleaches (i.e., a reduction  of
pollutant  raw  waste loading and a saving of processing raw
materials).

Dichromate based bleaches are not  regenerated  as  such  in
this  industry.   Some  plants reconstitute waste dichromate
bleach by discharging about 50  percent  of  the  waste  and
reconstitute the remainder by chemical addition.

                        TABLE VI1-2
     Total Cyanide Content in Plant Effluent of Plants
       Using Ferricyanide Bleach with No Regeneration

                   Total cyanide load,
Plant              kq/1,000 sq m (lb/1,000 sq ft)

0201                    8.3 (1.7)
0204                    23 (4.8)
0205                    48 (9.8)
0210                    21 (4.3)
0218                    13 (2.6)
0229                    18 (3.6)

                   Av = 22 (4.5)
                           VII-4

-------
                        TABLE VI 1-3
        Total Cyanide Content in Effluent of Plants
           Using Ferricyanide Bleach Regeneration

                        Total cyanide load,
                        kg/1, OOP sq m (lb/1,000 so ft)
0215                    4.4 (0.90)
0223                    7.3 (1 .5)
1465                    7.3 (1.5)
2714                    8.3 (1.7)
6208*                   0.78  (0.16)
8226*                   0.63  (0.13)  .-*

                   Av = 4.8 (0.98)

* These plants are movie labs.  Plant 6208 uses
  "replenish on demand" system for ferricyanide
  bleaches.

                        TABLE VI 1-4
     Total Cyanide Content in Effluent of Plants Using
        Ferricyanide Bleach Regeneration plus FeS04
            Precipitation Treatment on Waste Fix

                        Amount,
                        kg/1,000 sq m (lb/1,000 so ft)
0232                    1.3 (0.26)
0233                    0.59 (0.12)
0234                    2.6 (0.53)
0235                    1.4 (0.28)
0236                    0.59 (0.12)
0237                    1 .4 (0.28)
2465                    i.o (0.21)
2488                    0.39 (0.08)
3437                    0.26 (0.054)
4228                    1.4 (0.28)
4550                    0.54 (0.11)
4666                    1.7 (0.34)
5552                    1 .9 (0.39)
6726                    0.76 (0.16)

                   Av = 1 .1 (0.23)
                           VII-5

-------
©
                                                     - s
x   E
                                ©
                                      ©
                                           ©
              '1H31N03 30INVA3 1V101
              VII-6

-------
                                               . s
©
                                                - s
      ©
                      ©
                                      ©
                                           ©
         •MMOi/l)TlNaiN03 30INVA31V101
       VII-7

-------
©
                ©
                           0
                           0
                                    ©
                                             ©



                                             ©
                                              ©
                                                            -  s
                                                           -  s
                                                                  -  5
             tK root/fix 'maiNoa aotNVAO ivioi
                   VII-8

-------
    Silver Recovery

There  are at  least  five methods  in  current use  for recovery
of silver from photographic processing solutions.  These are
metallic replacement, electrolytic   plating,   ion  exchange,
reverse osmosis,  and chemical precipitation.

Tables   VII-5   through  VII-7   display   the  environmental
benefits of silver recovery and   summarize the  information
obtained.   Some  of the plants,  for which silver values are
given in  the  Section  V  effluent  data  tables,  are  not
included  in   Tables VII-5  through VII-7.   The available
information from  these plants was insufficient   to  allow  a
determination  of  the  particular silver  recovery category.
The production normalized total silver values  reported  are
based on the area of all material processed.  These data are
plotted  as  a cumulative  distribution   in  Figures  VI1-4
through VI1-6.  A considerable reduction in  the amount  of
silver  in  the  plant  effluent  is achieved by the use of
standard  metallic   replacement   and electrolytic   plating
silver recovery processes.

The  group  of plants shown in Table VII-7 and  Figure VII-6
either  hold   waste   fix  in  holding  tanks  pending  batch
discharge  or  contractor  haul the  waste  fix.   As a result,
the effluent samples taken  from  these  plants  contain  no
waste  fix.    The  silver  amount in the effluent from these
plants  is  attributed  to  carryover  of  silver  into  the
after-fix  wash.   The  average   quantity  of  silver  (0.11
kg/1,000 sq m) in the effluent of the  plants   included  in
Table  VII-7   supports  the  average silver  quantity (0.14
kg/1,000 sq m) for the plants included in  Table  VII-6  when
the  relative  amounts  of  silver   in  the fix  after silver
recovery  and  the   wash  water   are considered.   Although
contractor  hauling  potentially  results  in  reduced plant
effluent silver levels, the hauled fix must be   disposed  of
in  an  environmentally  sound  manner  for this to be a net
env i ronmenta1  benef i t.

Additional reduction of discharged silver  can be achieved by
the use of ion exchange  or  reverse osmosis  and  chemical
precipitation  in addition to the  standard  processes as shown
in  Table  VI1-8.    At  present,  most  of the industry uses
metallic  replacement  and  electrolytic   plating   recovery
methods.    Ion  exchange,  reverse osmosis,  and precipitation
                           VII-9

-------
methods are used only at a few sites and then, generally, in
addition to the other methods.

                        TABLE VII-5
   Results of Silver Recovery on Silver Content in Plant
      Effluent - No Silver Recovery on Some Processes

                        Total silver load,
Plant                   kg/1.OOP sq m (lb/1,000 so ft)

0204                    0.47 (0.096)
0205                    1.0 (0.21)
0209                    0.54 (0.11)
0218                    1.4 (0.29)
0223                    0.25 (0.051)
0227                    0.88 (0.18)
0228                    0.034 (0.007)
0229                    0.83 (0.17)
0230                    0.78 (0.16)

                   Av = 0.68 (0.14)
                          VII-10

-------
Plant

0201
0202
0203
0210
0211
0213
0214
0220
0221
0224
0225
0226
0232
0233
1421
1465
2146
2714
5120
8226
                   TABLE VI1-6
 Results of Silver Recovery on Silver Content in
Plant Effluent - Silver Recovery on All Processes

                   Total silver load,
                   kQ/1,000 sq m (lb/1,000 sq ft)
                   0.12 (0.025)
                   0.17 (0.034)
                   0.22 (0.045)
                   0.088 (0.018)
                   0.17 (0.034)
                   0.21 (0.044)
                   0.037 (0.0075)
                   0.054 (0.011)
                   0.34 (0.07)
                   0.073 (0.015)
                   0.15 (0.031)
                   0.23 (0.048)
                   0.13 (0.027)
                   0.049 (0.010)
                   0.27 (0.055)
                   0.13 (0.026)
                   0.32 (0.066)
                   0.063 (0.013)
                   0.0013 (2.6 x 10-4)
                   0.054 (0.011)

              Av = 0.14 (0.029)
                          VII-11

-------
Plant

0021
0206
0234
0235
0236
0237
0662
1635
2465
2488
3437
3630
4228
4550
4666
5552
6174
6582
6726
                   TABLE VI1-7
 Results of Silver Recovery on Silver Content in
Plant Effluent - Silver Recovery on All Waste Fix
           But Waste Fix Not in Sample

                   Total silver load,
                   kg/1,OOP so m (lb/1,000 sq ft)
                   0.16 (0.032)
                   0.059 (0.012)
                   0.059 (0.012)
                   0.19 (0.039)
                   0.088 (0.018)
                   0.14 (0.028)
                   0.12 (0.025)
                   0.25 (0.052)
                   0.088 (0.018)
                   0.10 (0.021)
                   0.028 (0.0058)
                   0.043 (0.0089)
                   0.14 (0.028)
                   0.078 (0.016)
                   0.068 (0.014)
                   0.059 (0.012)
                   0.054 (0.011)
                   0.13 (0.026)
                   0.17 (0.034)

               Av  = 0.11 (0.022)
                           VII-12

-------
                                           „ o
                                           _ e
                               o
                                                         E
                                                         3
                                                         U
                                        O
uib* 0001/*M '1N31NO3 U3A11S
        VII-13

-------
                                               -s
®
  ®
    ®
                                               -S  -
                      ®
                             ®
                                 ®
                                               -s
                                     ®
                                       ®
    »s MOI/BX 'main 03 UBAIIS




              VII-14

-------
           ©

           ©
                 ©
                         ©

                         ©
                                 ©

                                 ©

                                 ©

                                  ©
                                      ©
                                                   --S
- B
•8
-1
                                                         S   3
                                                              u
                                                     9        <=
                                                     w        IU
      '1M31H09 «3A1I$
VII-15

-------
                        TABLE VI1-8
      Results of Silver Recovery on Silver Content in
 Plant Effluent - Conventional Silver Recovery on All Waste
              Fix plus Additional Recovery By:

Ion Exchange on Wash Water Plus Wash Water Recycle

                        Total silver load,
Plant                   kg/1,OOP sq m (lb/1,000 sq ft)

6208                    0.048 (0.0098)

Precipitation Plus Reverse Osmosis Treatment of Wash
 Water and Wash Water Recycle

7781  •                  0.0088 (0.0018)

Table VII-9 compares the efficiencies of  individual  silver
recovery  units  used at some of the facilities.  These data
show  the  effects  of  specific  treatments  on  individual
wastewater  streams.   The  operating  conditions  used  for
either  the  electrolytic  or  metallic  replacement  silver
recovery  processes  will determine the efficiency of silver
recovery.  The efficiencies calculated for  reverse  osmosis
are  based  on  the incoming water versus the permeate.  The
concentrate solution from the reverse osmosis unit  contains
high  concentrations  of  silver  which should be recovered.
The relative efficiencies of the various types of units  are
not  directly  comparable  with  each  other  because of the
varying silver and other pollutant  levels  in  the  treated
solutions.
                          VII-16

-------
                        TABLE VI1-9
              Effectiveness of Various Silver
                    Recovery Procedures
                             Concentrations of Silver Present,
                             (mq/liter)	
Plant    Recovery Process    Influent  Effluent

6208     Ion exchange        2.0       0.14
         (wash water)

9061     Ion exchange
         {wash water)
          Unit 1             0.74      0.04
          Unit 2             0.60      0.10

4550     Metallic Replace-
         ment                1,580     4.7
         Electrolytic        576       21
         (primary plus
          tailing)

7781     Reverse Osmosis     68        14
         (wash water)
         Chemical Precipi-
         tation  (RO  concen-  57        0.08
         trate plus  waste
         fix)

2714     Reverse Osmosis
         (paper wash)        6.3       0.04
         Reverse Osmosis
         (film wash)         0.99      <0.02
Removal
Efficiency,
Percent

93
95
84
99.7
98
 79
 99.9
 99

 98 +
 The   relationship  between  the  effluent  concentration  and  the
 effluent amount  for  silver and  the   percent   of   production
 using  ferricyanide  bleach   for  total   cyanide   is  shown
 graphically  in Figures VII-7 and VII-8,   respectively.    The
 graphs  show a  poor   dependency  between concentration  and
 amount  for silver  or between   concentration  and   production
 percentage   for  total  cyanide.   Therefore,  a concentration
                           VII-17

-------
based  limitation would  not  necessarily   limit  the  amount
discharged.

A   "low-flow prewash" has been used on an  experimental basis
at plants 3630 and 6174 to allow  conventional  recovery  of
silver   from   after-fix  wash  water.    The  technique  as
described in Section III segments the  after-fix  wash  tank
into  prewash  and  final  wash  tanks.    The  prewash  tank
receives the fix dragout and  has  a  separate  fresh  water
anput  and  overflow.   The  water  input  flow is optimized
depending on the rate of waste fix carry-in and  its  silver
concentration  and  the  final silver treatment level of the
prewash.  The  benefits  of  using  this   system,  based  on
theoretical  calculations  and  the results from plant 3630,
are shown in Table VII-10.   These  calculations  were  made
using the following assumptions:

    (1) Paper wash rate = 5.7 liters/min
    (2) Silver concentration of normal paper wash = 6.1 mg/1
    (3) Bleach-fix silver concentration =  1,900 mg/1
    (4) The carry-over flow rate from the  bleach-fix
        to the wash is calculated to be 0.018 liters/min

Plant  3630  installed  a  prewash  system  on a color paper
processor.   Silver  was  recovered  from   the  prewash  tank
overflow with a conventional metallic replacement cannister.
The  results  obtained from this system over a period of 145
days are summarized below and in Table VII-10.

  Final wash flow - 5.7 liters/min
  Silver concentration in normal paper wash -
   1 to 5 mg/1
  Bleach-fix silver concentration - 3,000 mg/1
  The carryover flow rate from the bleach-fix
   to the wash is calculated to be 0.018 liters/min
  Silver concentration in final wash - 3.0 +_ 2.5 mg/1
                          VII-18

-------
                                     o
                                                  o
                                    o
                                           o°

                          o       a     &
                              ^ <3»     O  O

                       O    O OG
                          O
                                    O
                                         ©
O
                                         o
                        EFFLUENT SILVER CONCENTRATION, mo/I
        FIGURE  VII 7. EFFLUENT SILVER CONCENTRATION VS EFFLUENT SILVER AMOUNT
                       VII-19

-------
     * £
<  o
I  s
!-j  *»
£  2
s  —'
X  CB U
 I  I   I
B  < O
        QG
                   D O
                                                                ca
                                                                •
                                                                i
         'HOiivumasMoa SOIMVAO ivioi
            VII-20

-------
                        TABLE VII-10

                 Summary of Prewash Results
CR*
mq/1
1
10
100
          Prewash Flow
          1/min
               Percent
               Removal
               of Silver to
               Final Wash
                   Theoretical Results
43.6
138
436
         200
0.76
0.23
0.061
95.4
86.0
59.3
               Percent of
               Wash Water
               Needing
               Treatment
13.3
 4. 1
 1 .1
          Experimental Results for Plant 3630

          0.10           69              l.B
*CR - Silver concentration of prewash overflow after
      silver recovery.
**CT - Silver concentration in prewash tank.

Plant 6174 installed an experimental prewash system  on  the
paper  processors  and  measured the silver concentration in
the trench containing  the  rinse  wastewater.   The  silver
concentration  of  the  rinse  wastewater  before  and after
installation of the prewash system averaged 2.8 mg/liter and
0.52 mg/liter, respectively.

Experimentation  has  shown  that  there  are  a  number  of
potential  problems  in  using  the  prewash  system.  These
problems may be caused by trace chemical build-up, increased
fix time, and improper washing.  One investigator  found  an
increase in yellow stain six months after processing and had
problems  with  biological  growth.   Plants  3630  and 6174
experienced difficulties in controlling the silver  recovery
system  on  the  prewash  overflow  and had physical quality
problems introduced by required additional squeegees.

Recently  a  photographic   supplies   manufacturer,   after
extensive  evaluation,  has  approved  the use of a low-flow
prewash on the EP-2 NR process  as  an  alternative  to  the
conventional  wash  system.   The  application  of a prewash
                          VII-21

-------
system includes a  recommendation  for  electrolytic  silver
recovery  on  the  combined  waste  bleach-fix  and  prewash
overflow and metallic replacement  silver  recovery  on  the
electrolytic  unit  effluent  combined  with  the final wash
water.  Suggestions for controlling biological growth in the
prewash water holding tank and prewash  tank  are  included.
The  recommendations include cleaning the prewash tanks with
a 5 to 12 percent  sodium  hypochlorite  solution  at  least
weekly   or   more   often  depending  upon  the  processing
conditions. .

Wash Water Recycle

Wastewater hydraulic loads can be reduced  significantly  by
usj.ng  countercurrent  washing  and  partial recycle of wash
water.  The countercurrent washing referred to here involves
the use of segmented  wash  tanks  after  specific  chemical
tanks such as bleach-fix.  It does not refer to the practice
of  pumping  the  same wash water from one wash tank after a
chemical  tank  to  another  wash  tank  after  a  different
chemical  processing  solution.   This  could  result in the
intermixing of chemical solutions in the  improper  sequence
with  the process chemistry.  Table VII-11 shows the results
of countercurrent washing and wash  water  recycle  for  two
plants.  Both plants are large and a major proportion of the
total  production  is  prints  made  from original negatives
(6208 is a movie lab and 7781 is a  portrait  studio).   The
recycled  water is used only for the print processes at 6208
and i£ used for the print process and the final wash on  the
negative process at 7781.

The   magnitude  of  the  effluent  hydraulic  load  from  a
photoprocessing plant is mostly determined by how the  plant
handles  its process wash water, which is by far the largest
use of water in this industry.  The  use  of  countercurrent
washing  and  partial  recycle of wash water after treatment
with  reverse osmosis reduces  effluent  hydraulic  loads  by
over  90  percent.   However,  the  applicability  of  these
water-saving techniques depends on the  processes  used  and
the   process  and  product  mix  at  a particular plant.  As
discussed   in  Section  III,  potential  problems  such   as
biological  growth, trace chemical build-up, and  insufficient
washing  must  be controlled to prevent short- and long-term
adverse effects on product quality.
                          VII-22

-------
                        TABLE VII-11
      Effect of Countercurrent Washing and Wash Water
            Recycle on Effluent Hydraulic Loads

         Effluent Hydraulic       Counter-
         Load, 1/1,000 sq m       current        Recycle of
Plant    (gal/1TQOO sq ft)        Washing Used   Wash Water
6208     98,000 (2,400)*          no             30%2

7781     5,010 (123)i             yes            60%3

1   Average of 3 24-hour composite samples
2   After ion exchange treatment
3   After reverse osmosis treatment

END-OF-PIPE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES

The   end-of-pipe   treatment   technologies   employed   by
photoprocessing  plants  were  discussed  in Section III and
include  precipitation,  settling,  ozonation,   filtration,
clarification,   aeration,   neutralization,   equalization,
chlorination, flocculation, and reverse osmosis.  Ten of the
twenty plants visited by EPA employed one or more  of  these
treatment technologies as follows:
                          VII-23

-------
Plant No.           Technologies Employed

1465               ozonation (concentrated streams only)

4229               equalization, settling

3455               equalization, flocculation, precipitation,
                   clarification, ch1orination, settling,
                   filtration

9297               equalization, aeration, ozonation, settling

2714               equalization, neutralization, reverse
                   osmosis (wash water only)

4550               precipitation, flocculation, settling
                   (only waste fix containing iron-cyanide
                   complexes)

4849               chlorination  (wash water only)

7781               aeration, ozonation, precipitation,
                   settling, filtration

3075               settling

2387               settling

The  effluent  compositions  obtained by several plants as a
result of the treatments usd-d were shown in Section V.   The
two  facilities  having the most extensive treatment systems
(plants 7781 and  2714)  also  report  the  lowest  effluent
loadings  for  BOD,  TDS,  and  other parameters.  Also, the
facilities having no end-of-pipe  treatments   (plants  2465,
4666,  5552, 4228 and 3437) report high effluent loadings of
cyanides,  BOD, and TDS.  For some parameters,  the  loadings
from  these  "no treatment" sites are as much as an order of
magnitude greater than those reported for  plants  7781  and
2714.   Further  inspection  of  the data shows considerable
variation for a  number  of  parameters  even  among  plants
having  no  end-of-pipe  treatment.   The  reasons for these
variations  lie  in   differences   in   specific   products
processed,   in   water   usage,   and  in  plant  operating
procedures.  These factors  can  influence  the  amounts  of
discharged  materials.   However,  despite the variations in
                          VII-24

-------
 waste  loadings  observed  among plants,  it   is   also   observed
 that    the    application   of   end-of-pipe treatments   does
 generally lead  to  reduced  discharges of several  pollutants.

 Cadmium and  chromium  do  not occur  in all  photoprocessing
 waste    streams,    and   no  generally  applicable   treatment
 technology   was observed   being  used for  these   specific
 pollutants.   Cadmium occurs   in   the color  developer and
 bleach-fix wastes  of  plants using certain  papers.   The major
 manufacturer of papers of   this type  has indicated  their
 intention  to  phase  out   cadmium.    Chromium occurs in the
 processing waste streams from one color motion picture   film
 process and  some black and white reversal  processes.

 Plant   7781   has   used   ion exchange  to remove  cadmium  from
 their  wastewaters.  The  column  was  eluted  and  a  concentrated
 cadmium solution   resulted which  had  to  be  treated or
 disposed of  by  contractor  hauling.

 Plants  using  dichromate   bleach   can reduce the  amount of
 chromium in  their  effluent by treating the plant effluent or
 by segregating  and treating the after-bleach wash water   and
 dichromate bleach  solution wastes.  The wash water  and waste
 bleach  contain   a  mixture of  hexavalent   and   trivalent
 chromium.  A waste bleach   sample   from  plant  6208  had a
 hexavalent   chromium  concentration  of 1,020  mg/liter and a
 total  chromium  concentration of 1,700  mg/liter.   The  plant
 effluent   had   hexavalent  chromium and  total   chromium
 concentration ranges  of  <0.02 to 0.44  mg/liter and  2.8  to
 3.5  mg/liter,  respectively,   indicating  that  most of  the
 hexavalent chromium was  reduced to  the trivalent form in  the
 mixed  waste  effluent.

 Treatment of  the total effluent  to  reduce  the  amount  of
 chromium would  consist of  pH adjustment for precipitation of
 the    trivalent    chromium   and  clarification.   Subsequent
 filtration would reduce  the  chromium to lower  levels.    The
 filter  cake  containing the  precipitated chromium salts would
 be  disposed  of   by  contractor  hauling  for  landfill ing or
 equivalent disposal method.

An  alternative  method  would  be  to  mix  the  segregated
after-bleach  wash  and bleach solution wastes and treat the
relatively low volume mixture.   The treatment  would  consist
of   hexavalent    chromium   reduction,  pH  adjustment  for
                          VII-25

-------
precipitation  and  diatomaceous  earth  filtration.    This
technology   has   been  successfully  demonstrated  by  the
electroplating industry for treatment of chromium.  Chromium
reduction efficiencies of 95 percent were achieved in  waste
streams  having  up  to 525 mg/liter chromium.  After-bleach
wash water contains up to  100  mg/liter  chromium  and  the
waste  bleach approximately 1,700 mg/liter.  The mixed waste
solution would have a chromium concentration  of  about  115
mg/liter  based  on  the  relative flows of 20 liters/hr and
2,300  liters/hr   of   waste   bleach   and   wash   water,
respectively.   Thus, the photographic wastes are within the
chromium concentration range  successfully  treated  in  the
electroplating industry.

Plant  6208 has, on an experimental basis, demonstrated that
further volume reduction of wastewater  containing  chromium
can   be  achieved  by  treating  the  wash  water  with  an
ion-exchange  resin.   Chromium  was  concentrated  in   the
relatively low volume elutriant from the column and the wash
water  was  recycled.   The elutriant could be treated using
the technology described above.  The demonstration  unit  at
6208  removed  chromium  from the wash water with an average
efficiency of 92 percent during normal operation.

During the later part of this study,  plant   7781   completed
the   installation of a system which reduces the discharge of
process wastewater  to a minimum.   (All  hydraulic   load  and
in-plant  and  effluent  data reported  in  Sections  V and VII
for 7781 result from the in-process  control  and   treatment
system  which was in place prior to the modified  system that
is    described   below.    The   characteristics    of    the
before-modification system were also described  in Sections  V
and   VII.)   The system, shown schematically  in  Figure  VII-9,
consists of  conventional and advanced  in-process  controls to
reduce the production of  wastewater   and  three  stages  of
wastewater   evaporation.    In-process   controls   used  on the
film  process    include   prebath   recycle,    EDTA   bleach
regeneration,  and   continuous  silver  recovery from  the fix
solution.    The  paper  process  controls    are:    developer
regeneration  by    ion    exchange  and  chemical   addition,
bleach-fix regeneration after electrolytic silver  recovery,
50  percent   stabilizer  recycle   by   chemical  addition, and
countercurrent   after-fix   washing  to  reduce   wash    water
volume.  All film wash  water, except  the  after-prebath wash,
and   the paper wash water  are collected and  treated with  two
                           VII-26

-------
reverse osmosis units.  The  permeate  is  recycled  to  the
process.   The  concentrate  is combined with the waste film
developer, stop, and all other waste solutions and  directed
to  the  two-stage  evaporator.   At  this  point  the waste
contains about 2 percent solids.  The  first  stage  of  the
evaporator  increases  the  solids concentration to about 20
percent and the second stage  to  about  65  percent.   This
wastewater  is then pumped to the film wipe evaporator which
increases the solids  content  of  the  waste  to  about  80
percent.   The  solid  waste is sent to a smelter for silver
reclamation.   The  condensate  from  both  evaporators   is
condensed  and  passed  through  an  ion  exchange  unit for
reduction of ammonia.  The condensed'water  is  recycled  to
the  process and the elutriant containing ammonia is used as
lawn fertilizer or disposed of by contractor  hauling.   The
plant  has  experienced  mechanical  difficulties  with  the
wipe-film   evaporator   which   require   periodic   repair
maintenance.  During these repair periods, the evaporator is
shut  down and the 65 percent solids content wastewater from
the two-stage evaporator is contractor hauled.

VARIABILITY FACTOR

Even plants which are achieving  state-of-the-art  pollutant
reduction  occasionally  experience  days  of  above average
pollutant discharge.  These high days may reflect  temporary
imbalances in the treatment system caused by fluctuations in
flow,  in  raw waste loading, in chemical feed, or in mixing
flows  within  the  tanks.    Allowance   for   the   random
variability of the discharge of a well designed and operated
plant  may be made by applying a "variability factor" to the
expected long-term average.  The expected long-term  average
is then multiplied by the variability factor.

The  formulation  of  appropriate  variability factors given
below is based upon observed discharge data  from  operating
plants.   The  daily  maximum and the 30-day average maximum
variability factors, at the  99  percent  confidence  level,
were calculated using the following relationships:

  Daily maximum variability factor = e exp [2.326 SY - 0.5  (SY)*]
  Where SY = standard deviation of the natural logarithms of
              the measured concentrations
                          VII-27

-------
VII-28

-------
  30-day average maximum = [mean X + 2.326 SX/sq rt 30]/mean X
  Where X = measured concentration
       SX = standard deviation of the measured concentrations

The results of this analysis on the available long-term data
are  shown  in  Table VI1-12.  These data supplied by plants
6208 and 7781  are concentration values obtained  from  daily
samples of effluent over various time periods.  The raw data
are  given in Appendix B.   A cumulative distribution plot of
the silver data from plant 6208 is shown in Figure VII-10.
                          VII-29

-------
             ir
             •rH


             1b
            I -H £
                s
                   m  (N  ro|  f)   fN


                   ,-J  -i  H|  -H   C4
                              »
                   Ol  If!  \O


                   o  o  o
                   O  **1  4  -H
                    WWW
  •8
H -H

U

                                         VII-30

-------
10
 9
 8
 7
 6

 s

 4 _


 3 _
 2 _
 1
0.9
0.8
0.7

0.6

O.S

0.4


ft.3 _
0.2 _
0.1
0,09;
0.08.
0.07.

046.

0.05.

0,04,


0.03 _



0.02 _
 0.01
     2%
                           I
                           15
 1
40
r
so
90
        95
                98%
                                             PERCENTAGE
           FIGURE  VII-10  LONG-TERM SILVER CONCENTRATION IN EFFLUENT AT PLANT 6208
                                        VII-31

-------

-------
                         SECTION  VIII

     COST,  ENERGY, WASTE  REDUCTION  BENEFITS  AND  NON-WATER
        ASPECTS OF TREATMENT  AND  CONTROL  TECHNOLOGIES


 INTRODUCTION

 Costs  for  the treatment  and  control of waterborne pollutants
 in  the photoprocessing   industry  have   been  developed   for
 various levels  of   technology  currently  in   use   in   the
 industry.  These technologies were described  in Section   III
 and their  effectiveness  was  discussed in Section VII.

 In   developing  the   costs   for  the various  levels of tech-
 nologies,  factors such as plant  age, space  requirements,  and
 geographic location were considered.    Age  may indirectly
 influence  control and treatment  costs through the effects of
 isolation  and  control  of wastes  and space limitations.  It
 was found  that age was not a major cost  contributing  factor
 in   this   industry.  The control and isolation  of wastes  are
 not generally a problem  regardless of plant age because,  by
 the nature  of  the  photographic processing  equipment  and
 operation, wastes can be isolated.  It is also  observed that
 space  limitations are not generally a  problem   because   the
 control equipment is relatively  compact  and self-contained.

 Geographic  location does not significantly affect the costs
 of  control  and  treatment   technologies  in  this  industry
 because  processes  used are the  same throughout the United
 States, irrespective of  geography  or climate.

GENERAL COST REFERENCES  AND  RATIONALE

Cost information contained in this report was obtained  from
 industry,   engineering   firms,   equipment   suppliers,   and
published  literature.  Whenever possible, costs  were  taken
from   actual   installations,   engineering  estimates   for
projected facilities as  supplied by contributing  companies,
or  from equipment suppliers' quoted prices.  In the absence
of such information,  cost   estimates  were  developed  from
actual  costs  incurred  in other industries for  treatment of
similar wastes.   Such cost estimates were developed for   the
treatment   of   dichromate  bleach  wastes  by  using  cost
                          VIII-i

-------
information from the electroplating  point  source  category
for the treatment of chromium-containing wastes.

Interest Costs and Equity Financing Charges

Estimates  for  this  study were based on 15 percent cost of
capital, representing an overall average for either interest
paid or return on investment required.

Time Basis for Costs

All cost  estimates  are  based  on  1977  prices  and  when
necessary  have  been  adjusted  to  this  basis  using  the
Chemical Engineering facility cost index.

Useful Service Life

The useful service life of treatment and  control  equipment
varies  depending on the nature of the equipment and process
involved, its use pattern, maintenance  and  numerous  other
factors.  Individual companies may apply service lives based
on   their  actual  experience  for   internal   amortization.
Internal  Revenue  Service  provides  guidelines   for   tax
purposes   which   are   intended   to  approximate  average
experience.  Based on industry practice  and  condensed  IRS
guideline  information,  a 10-year useful service  life value
for control and  treatment equipment was used.

Depreciation

The economic value of treatment and   control  equipment  and
facilities  decreases  over  its service  life.   At  the end  of
the useful life,  it  is usually assumed  that the salvage   or
recovery  value   becomes  zero.    For  IRS  tax purposes  or
internal  depreciation   provisions,    straight   line,    or
accelerated  write-off schedules may  be  used.   Straight  line
depreciation was used solely  in this  report.

Capital  Investment

Capital    investment   is    defined    as   all     front-end,
out-of-pocket    expenditures    for  providing   treatment   or
control  facilities.   These  costs  include costs  for  research
and    development   necessary  to  establish   the  process,
equipment,    construction    and    installation,    services,
                           VIII-2

-------
 engineering,   special   start-up costs and contractor profits
 and  contingencies.

 Annual  Capital Costs

 Most,  if  not  all,  of  the  capital costs  are  accrued  during
 the   procurement   and   installation  of  the equipment.   This
 present worth sum  can  be   converted  to   equivalent   uniform
 annual  disbursements   by  utilizing  the  Capital   Recovery
 Factor  Method:

     Uniform Annual  Disbursement = P id  + i)nth  power
                                   1(1+  i)nth power]  -  1

     Where P = present  value (capital expenditures),

           i = interest rate,  %/100

           n = useful  life in  years

 Using an  interest  cost of 15  percent and a  useful life  of  10
 years:

     Uniform Annual  Disbursement = 0.15 P (1.15?*o
                                 =  0.199 P
Land Costs
Land costs are not a significant  factor  affecting  control
and treatment costs in this  industry, since the equipment  is
generally  compact  and  self-contained and can be housed  in
existing  facilities.   Interior  space   costs   were   not
considered.

Operating Expenses

Annual   costs   of   operating  the  treatment  or  control
facilities   include    labor,    supervision,    materials,
maintenance,  taxes,  and insurance.  Power and energy costs
were estimated by determining  the  electrical  requirements
for the equipment and using five cents per kilowatt-hour for
the  cost  of  electrical  energy.  Operating costs combined
with annualized capital costs give the  total  annual  costs
                          VIII-3

-------
for treatment and control.  The total annual operating costs
minus  the  return  from  recovered silver and chemical cost
savings  represent  the  net  annual  operating  costs.   No
interest  cost was included for operating (working) capital.
Since working capital might be assumed to  be  one-sixth  to
one-third    of    annual    operating    costs    (excluding
depreciation), about 1-2 percent of  total  operating  costs
might be involved.  This is considered to be well within the
accuracy of the estimates.

It  is  recognized  that  all  costs  and  cost benefits for
conventional silver recovery  and  bleach  regeneration  are
costs  incurred  as  a  result  of  normal industry business
practice  based  on  economic  rather   than   environmental
incentives.   As  was  shown  in  Table  VII-1,  most of the
industry use these in-process  controls.   Costs   for  these
controls  are  included  in  this  section  for  information
purposes and for those few facilities that do not  presently
use them.

Representative Facilities

Some  cost  information was obtained from the plants studied
and from control and treatment equipment  suppliers.   These
cost  data  cover  a  wide  range of plant sizes in terms of
production.  To facilitate costing,  "typical"  plant  sizes
were  selected as being representative of each of  four plant
size categories that cover the range of available  cost data.
The "typical" plant production and production range for each
representative category are given in  Table  VIII-1.   Costs
are  developed  for  the  "typical" plant  in each category in
the following subsections.

CONTROL   AND    TREATMENT    COSTS    FOR    REPRESENTATIVE
PHOTOPROCESSING PLANTS

Control  and  treatment   costs  were  developed  for various
levels  of    technology   at   representative   photographic
processing  plants.   These costs were developed from  actual
cost information supplied by the  plants  studied  and from
cost  estimates  provided by control and  treatment equipment
suppliers.  The costed control technologies are:  (1) various
levels of silver recovery,  (2) EDTA bleach regeneration,  (3)
ferricyanide  bleach  regeneration,  (4) precipitation of waste
fix for ferricyanide reduction,  (5) treatment of   dichromate
                           VIII-4

-------






s
•u
g
fl

*

r4
\4
3
rti
iH











S

•3
1
1
0










&
•C1 u?
e
IT
iH Si
30
0 O
H O O
Qj O *
^r4"i



^^
Lj
5
M ?fc
SL .^
^S^ ^M
rf
01
tr H
w
o
0) O O
Ho o
clo -

"v
"S
cr
m m
W WJ
ra o
0 o o
H O O


">
Is
E

cr 8

. o
flj O O
BiO o
clo -

rr L_4 <*^




&
So
 vo iH IO
•«• fH t O 0
(-t I in o in
1 10 M l£> -
O & •* fH i
i 5
l I i i I H
ro i a
C^ O O^ O \& O PI
O • iH . V • \0
. r-i . (N . m • w
o •— • o ^-* o — • ^ >i
fl
-O
S
•rt
1
a
o
in
04
< CQ o a

*

VIII-5

-------
bleach   waste  for  chromium  reduction,  and  (6)  use  of
conventional   and   advanced   in-process   controls    and
multi-stage   evaporation   to   reduce  process  wastewater
discharge to a minimum.  Each of the technologies  has  been
costed  separately.   To  determine  the  total  costs for a
particular plant, the costs for the individual  technologies
should  be  summed  depending  on  the size of the plant and
particular system used.

The best fit regression line shown on  all  graphs  in  this
section   was   determined  by  regression  analysis.   This
analysis  involved  calculating  the  linear,   exponential,
logarithmic,  and power regression lines and the coefficient
of determination (r2) which is a measure of goodness of fit.
The regression fit which had the most favorable  coefficient
of  determination  was  selected  for  use  in  cost  deter-
minations.

Silver Recovery

Silver recovery costs were developed  for  the  recovery  of
silver   from  fix  solutions  using  conventional  recovery
methods and for the recovery of silver from  after-fix  wash
water  using  ion exchange or reverse osmosis.  These costs,
as determined for the various typical plant sizes, are given
in Tables VIII-2 through VIII-4.

    Specific Costing References  and  Rationale  for  Silver
    Recovery

    Silver  Recovery  from  Fix Solutions Using Conventional
    Methods--
Figure  VIII-1  is  a  graph  of  silver  recovery   capital
investment  costs  versus  production  which  includes plant
supplied actual costs  and  the  estimated  range  of  costs
supplied  by  a  major equipment supplier for representative
plant sizes B, C, and D.  All  costs  include  installation.
The  cost  information  supplied  by  the  individual plants
includes costs for all types of conventional silver recovery
equipment.  The cost data supplied by the equipment supplier
were based on the following assumptions for the B, C, and  D
representative plants:
                          VIII-6

-------
                 TABIE VIII-2

COSTS FOR RECOVERY OF SIIWER FBCM FIX SOLUTIONS
          USING CONVENTIONAL METHODS
Plant Size
Typical Annual Production,
1, 000 sq m/year
(1,000 sq ft/year)
1977 Dollars'
Capital Investment Required
.Annual Costs:
Capital Recovery
Operating and Maintenance
Energy and Power
Total
Annual Resource Recovery
Net Annual Cost (Benefit)
A
35 (375)

4,500
900
340
500
1,740
19,100
(17,360)
B
81 (875)

8,600
1,700
800
500
3,000
44,600
(41,600)
C
350 (3,750)

26,400
5,300
3,400
1,200
9,900
191,000
(181,100)
D
1,740 (18,750)

90,700
18,000
16,800
2,300
37,100
956,000
(918,900)
              VIII-7

-------
               TABIE VIII-3
COSTS FCR RECOVERY CF SILVER FRCM AFTER-FIX
        WASH WATERS BY ICN EXCHAKE
Plant Size
Typical Annual Production,
1, 000 sq in/year
(1,000 sq ft/year)
1977 Dollars
Capital Investment Required
Annual Costs:
Capital Recovery
Operating and Maintenance
Energy and Power
Total
Annual Resource Recovery
Net Annual Cost (Benefit)
A
35 (375)

10,800
2,150
1,900
30
4,080
2,600
1,480
B
81 (875)

10,800
2,150
3,130
70
5,350
6,100
( 750)
C
350 (3,750)

31,200
6,200
10,100
300
16,600
26,000
( 9,400)
D
1,740 (18,750)

90,700
18,000
46,100
1,500
65,600
130,000
( 64,400)
             VIII-8

-------
                 TABIE VHI-4
   COSTS FOR RECOVERY OF SILVER FROM AFTER-FIX
WASH T3CERS BY REVERSE OSMCSIS  AND PRECIPITATION
Plant Size
Typical Annual Production,
1, 000 sq m/year
(1,000 sq ft/year)
1977 mil firs
Capital Investment Required
Annual Costs:
Capital Recovery
Operating and Maintenance
Energy and Powsr
Total
Annual Resource Recovery
Net Annual Cost (Benefit)
A
35 (375)

15,300
3,000
5,150
800
8,950
2,600
6,350
B
81 (875)

19,400
3,900
6 ,600
800
11,300
6,100
5,200
C
350 (3,750)

34,800
6,900
16,400
1,900
25,200
26,000
( 800)
D
1,740 (18,750)

85,800
17,100
61,000
2,300
80,400
130,000
( 49,600)
                VIII-9

-------
             <0
        o
                                  s <
                                  "
W (0 —
IH UI •
i II
< <§
i ii
                               o   o
                                              5  <
                                              i  i
                                              (-  "
                                              ^  £
sttvnoa jo SONVSHOHI '
             VIII-10

-------
    (1)  Color negative film and paper are processed with  a
         balance of 10 percent film and 90 percent paper.

    (2)  A recirculating electrolytic silver recovery system
         is used on the film fix with electrolytic "tailing"
         on fix overflow.

    (3)  A batch electrolytic silver recovery system is used
         on the paper bleach-fix.

    (4)  The B plant uses electrolytic tailing only on  film
         fix overflow, i.e., no recirculating system.

    (5)  Assumes the B and C plants have two continuous film
         processors and the D  plant  has  three  continuous
         film processors.

    (6)  Installation costs are included.

The regression analysis of  the  data  presented  in  Figure
VIII-1  yielded  the  following relationship between capital
investment for silver recovery equipment and production.

    CI = 297.18(P) exp. 0.7666

where:

    CI * Capital investment, dollars
    P = Production, 1,000 sq m/yr

This  relationship  was  used  to  calculate   the   capital
investment costs given in Table VIII-2.

Figure  VIII-2 is a graph of silver recovery operating costs
versus  production.   This  curve  was  derived  from  plant
supplied  actual  costs.  The regression line is represented
by the following equation:

    OC = 9.8119(P) exp. 0.9981

where:

    OC « Operating cost, dollars
    P = Production, 1,000 sq m/yr
                          VIII-11

-------
                        .

                       «  52
                          H U

                          < 2
                          co
                          iu O
                                  -II
                                  -8
suvnoa
   VIII-12

-------
This relationship was used to calculate the operating  costs
in Table VIII-2.

Energy  and  power  estimates  for the representative plants
were estimated  from  power  requirements  provided  by  the
equipment  supplier,  an electrical energy cost of $0.05 per
kilowatt hour, and an assumed 20 hours per day, 250 days per
year operation.

The annual resource recovery cost is a benefit cost that was
derived from the amount of silver contained in the  emulsion
of the material processed by the representative plants and a
silver  value of $12.00 per troy ounce.  The silver recovery
benefit calculation is based on the following:

    (1)  A color negative plant having a 10:90 film to paper
         ratio.
    (2)  Ninety percent of the total silver in the  emulsion
         is  contained  in  the  fix  and ten percent of the
         total silver is carried  into  the  after-fix  wash
         water.
    (3)  The  conventional  silver  recovery  methods  yield
         ninety  percent of the silver contained in the fix,
         i.e., 81 percent of the total silver  contained  in
         the processed film and paper.


    Silver  Recovery  from  After-Fix  Wash  Water Using Ion
    Exchange—

The costs for the recovery of  silver  from  after-fix  wash
water  by  ion  exchange  are  given in Table VIII-3.  These
costs were developed using the following bases:

    (1)  Information on  capital  and  operating  costs  was
         supplied by ion exchange equipment suppliers.

    (2)  The amount of equipment  for  each  plant  size  is
         based  on  an  estimate of the after-fix wash water
         flow.  This estimate is  based  on  the  assumption
         that the after-fix wash water flow is 50 percent of
         the   total  process  water  hydraulic  load.   The
         average  total   process   water   hydraulic   load
         determined for the industry is 157,000 liters/1,000
         sq  m (3,850 gal/1,000 sq ft) based on the data for
                          VIII-13

-------
     70 plants  given  in  Table  V-4.    Therefore,   the
     estimated  after-fix  wash  water   load  is  78,500
     liters/1,000 sq m (1,930 gal/1,000 sq ft).

     Based on this flow estimate,   the   numbers   of   ion
     exchange  tanks required by the various plant sizes
     are:

     Plant Size          Pairs of Ion Exchange Tanks

          A                        1
          B                        1
          C                        2
          D                        7

(3)   Daily hours of  operation  for  the  representative
     plants  were assumed to be 8,  8, 16,  and 24 for the
     A, B,  C, and D plants,  respectively.

(4)   The maximum flow rate to each pair of ion  exchange
     tanks is 57 liters/min (15 gal/min).

(5)   The  installation  costs  (part of   the   capital
     investment),  which  include the necessary  plumbing
     and electrical work in preparation for delivery  of
     equipment,  are estimated to be $500 per pair of ion
     exchange  tanks.    Also  included   as  installation
     costs are ten treated water analyses at  $30 each.
     These analyses are performed during start-up.

(6)   The ion exchange tanks are regenerated off  site  by
     the  equipment  supplier.  The fee charged  for  this
     service  is  part  of  the  operating  cost.    The
     in-plant  operating  and  maintenance costs include
     maintenance labor of one hour per  week per  pair  of
     tanks  (labor  rate  at  $15,000 per year)  plus one
     treated water  analysis  per  regeneration   at   $30
     each.

(7)   The annual  resource recovery cost  benefit is based
     on  the  silver  recovered  from the after-fix  wash
     water and waste fix.  (It is assumed that the waste
     fix,  after  conventional silver recovery,  is mixed
     with   the  after-fix  wash  water.)   A total of 19
     percent of  the silver contained in the emulsion  is
                      VIII-14

-------
         available to the ion exchange system (10 percent in
         the  wash  water plus nine percent remaining in the
         waste  fix  after  conventional  silver  recovery).
         With  an  assumed  ion  exchange  efficiency  of 80
         percent and a silver refining fee  of  25  percent,
         the  silver  returned  to  the  plant amounts to 11
         percent of the silver contained  in  the  emulsion.
         The  annual  resource  recovery  was computed for a
         10:90 color negative film to paper ratio and with a
         silver value of $12 per troy ounce.


    Silver Recovery from After-Fix Wash Water Using  Reverse
    Osmosis and Precipitation—

The  costs  for  the  recovery of silver from after-fix wash
water by reverse osmosis  and  precipitation  are  given  in
Table   VII1-4.     Plant   7781   used,  and  supplied  cost
information for, a  precipitation  process  to  recover  the
silver  from  the  reverse  osmosis  concentrate.  It may be
possible to use other methods to  recover  silver  from  the
reverse  osmosis  concentrate,  but  no cost information was
available for this  specific  application.   Costs  for  the
reverse  osmosis  and precipitation processes were developed
using the following bases:

    (1)  The reverse osmosis capital investment costs versus
         flow were provided by an equipment supplier and are
         shown in Figure  VIII-3.   The  capital  investment
         costs   for  the  reverse  osmosis  equipment  were
         derived from the following relationship:

              CI = 9556 + 0.4016 F

         where:

              CI = Capital investment,  dollars
              F  - Flow,  1,000 liters per day

         The production of  the  representative  plants  was
         related  to the flow by linear scaling of the input
         flow to a reverse osmosis unit used by plant 7781.

    (2)   Reverse osmosis operating and  maintenance and power
         costs are based on information  from  an  equipment
                          VIII-15

-------
50-1
                                  REGRESSION LINE EQUATION
                           INVESTMENT CAPITAL - 9556 + 0.4016 [FLOW)



                           INVESTMENT CAPITAL. THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS

                           FLOW, 1000 LITERS/DAY
                                            ~T
                                             80
"T
 100
                        FLOW. 1000 LITERS/DAY




  FIGURE  VIH-3 REVERSE OSMOSIS EQUIPMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT COST VS FLOW

              INCLUDES REVERSE OSMOSIS, CONDUCTIVITY CONTROL AKO PREFILTER
                    VIII-16

-------
         supplier.    These   operating   and maintenance  costs
         include membrane replacement  and cleaning   solution
         costs  and  labor costs  for maintenance  and  solution
         analyses.

    (3)   The capital  investment   for   the  precipitation  of
         silver from the concentrate was obtained  using cost
         information   for   plant  7781  and  the   following
         relationship:

             CN = C r  exp  0.6

         where:

             CN =   capital  investment for  representative
                  plants,  dollars
             C    =   capital  investment   incurred  by  plant
                  7781, dollars
             r  = production ratio of representative  plant
                  to plant 7781.

    (4)   Precipitation operating and maintenance  and  power
         costs  were  directly scaled to plant 7781.

    (5)   The annual  resource recovery cost   benefit,  as  in
         ion exchange,  is  based on the silver recovered from
         the  after-fix  wash  water combined with the  waste
         fix  (after  conventional  silver   recovery).    The
         amount  of   silver recovered is  estimated to be the
         same as  that determined for ion  exchange.

EDTA Bleach Regeneration

The costed EDTA regeneration process  consists  of  aeration
with  chemical   addition.    If bleach-fix  is the regenerated
material, it  is   assumed  that  the  silver  in  the  spent
bleach-fix has  been  recovered by the techniques discussed in
the previous section.

The   collected  information  used  to  determine  costs  is
graphically summarized  in Figures VIII-4   and  VIII-5.    The
costs,   as  determined  for  the  representative plants, are
shown in Table VIII-5.
                          VIII-17

-------
            o o
                         I- Z
                         z o
                         > 2
                                 _S
                                 _8
                                 _I
stnrnoa '
    VIII-18

-------
  lOO.OOO-i
5  10,000 —
                      0
                                                            REGRESSION LINE EQUATION
    i ,000 —
                                                      OPERATING COST- 1293.0.0013621PRODUCTIONI

                                                      OPERATING COST. DOLLARS
                                                      PRODUCTION. 1000 tqm/YEAR
                ZOO
                             600
                                           1000    1200    1400    1600    1800
                                               PRODUCTION, 1000 »»m/VEAR
                                                                              2000
                                                                                           2400   2600
                                                                                                         2800
                        FIGURE  VIII-5 FeEQTA BLEACH REGENERATION OPERATING COSTS VS PRODUCTION
                                          VIII-19

-------
                  TABIE VIII-5
COSTS FOR FERRIC EETA EEEftCH REGENERATION BY AERATICN
              AND CHEMICAL ADDITION
Plant Size
Typical Annual Production,
1,000 sq nvVear
C 1,000 aq ft/year)
1977 Dollars
Capital Investment Required
Annual Costs:
Capital Recovery
Operating and Maintenance
Energy and Power
Total
Annual Resource Recovery
Net Annual Cost (Benefit)
A
35 (375)

2,400
480
1,360
200
2,040
9,200
(7,160)
B
81 (875)

2,500
500
1,400
200
2,100
21,000
(18,900)
C
350 (3,750)

2,900
600
2,100
600
3,300
93,300
(90,000)
D
1,740 (18,750)

4,900
1,000
13,800
1,000
15,800
465,000
(449,200)
                VIII-20

-------
    Specific  Costing  References  and  Rationale  for  EDTA
    Bleach Regeneration

Figure VIII-4 is a graph of EDTA bleach regeneration capital
investment  costs  versus  production which represents plant
supplied actual costs and the estimated costs supplied by  a
control  equipment  supplier  for the representative plants.
The costs include installation.  The cost data  supplied  by
the   equipment   supplier   were  based  on  the  following
assumptions for the representative plants:

    (1)  Color negative film and paper are processed with  a
         balance of 10 percent film and 90 percent paper.

    (2)  The film process uses EDTA  bleach  and  the  paper
         process uses bleach-fix with a ferric EDTA base.

The  following  relationship  between capital investment and
production was derived by a regression analysis of the  data
presented in Figure VIII-4:

    CI = 2384 + 1.445 P

where:

    CI « Capital investment, dollars
    P - Production, 1,000 sq m/yr

This   relationship   was  used  to  calculate  the  capital
investment costs presented in Table VII1-5.

Figure  VIII-5  is  a  graph  of  EDTA  bleach  regeneration
operating  costs  versus  production  which represents plant
supplied actual costs.  The following  relationship  between
operating costs and production was derived:

    OC * 1293 e exp. 0.001362P

where:

    OC - Operating cost, dollars
    P = Production, 1,000 sq m/yr

The  energy and power requirements were assumed to be for 1,
1, 3,  and 5 horsepower motors,  for  the  A,  B,  C,  and  D
                          VIII-21

-------
plants,   respectively,   to  operate  air  compressors  for
aeration.  Electric energy costs were assumed  to  be  $0.05
per  kilowatt  hour  with  an operation time of 20 hours per
day, 250 days per year.

Annual resource recovery benefits are based on the  chemical
savings   gained  by  not  disposing  of  the  bleach.   The
determination was made, for each plant size,  by  taking  80
percent  of  the  bleach  chemical costs and subtracting the
cost of the  bleach  regenerate  chemicals.   The  following
assumptions were made:

    (1)  Eighty percent of the waste bleach is regenerated.

    (2)  To determine bleach and  bleach  regenerate  costs,
         price  information  for the C-41 color film and for
         the EP-2 color paper processes was used.

    (3)  Replenishment rates of 0.925  liters/sq  m  (0.0227
         gal/sq ft) and 0.322 liters/sq m (0.0079 gal/sq ft)
         were   used  for  the  C-41   bleach  and  the  EP-2
         bleach-fix, respectively.

Ferricvanide Bleach Regeneration

The costed ferricyanide bleach regeneration process utilizes
ozonation for regeneration.   The costs,   as  determined  for
the representative plants,  are shown in Table VIII-6.

    Specific  "  Costing   References   and   Rationale   for
    Ferricvanide Bleach Regeneration                     	

The  specific  capital  investment  cost   information   was
supplied by a control  equipment supplier.   The equipment for
the representative plants are listed below:
                          VIII-22

-------
                    TABLE VIII-6



COSTS FOR EERRICYANIDE BLEACH REGENERATION BY OZONATION
Plant Size
Typical Annual Production
"(Film Only) ,
1,000 sq rr/year
(1,000 sq ft/year)
1977 Dollars
Capital Investment Required
Annual Costs:
Capital Recovery
Operating and Maintenance
Energy and Power
Total
Annual Resource Recovery
Net Annual Cost (Benefit)
A
3.5 (37.5)

21,400
4,300
3,400
10
7,710
1,100
6,610
B
8.1 (87.5)

21,400
4,300
3,400
20
7,720
2,500
5,220
C
35 (375)

25,500
5,100
3,400
100
8,600
10,900
( 2,300)
D
174 (1,875)

33,500
6,700
3,400
500
10,600
54,500
(43,900)
Pollutant Parameter,
kgA'OOO sq m
Cyanide, Total
Effluent Without
Treatment
22
Effluent With
Treatment
4.8
                 VIII-23

-------
    A and B plant - batch system

      ozone generator
      ozone monitor
      pH control
      pump
      50-gallon tank

    C and D plant -
    continuous on-line system

      ozone generator
      ozone monitor
      pH control
      pump
      100-gallon tank
      automatic controls

The  ozone  generator  was  costed  by selecting the nearest
larger size commensurate with the plant  ozone  requirements
based  on  the  amount  of film processed using ferricyanide
bleach.   The ozone requirement was related to production  as
stated in process specifications.

Operating costs are based on the costs given for a "typical"
plant   using  ozone  regeneration  in  a  film  processor's
publication.  Energy and power costs for the  representative
plants  are  based on a power requirement of 10 kwh per 0.45
kg (1 Ib)  of  ozone  generated,  an  ozone  amount  of  2.4
kg/1,000  sq  m  (0.48  lb/1,000 sq ft), and a power cost of
$0.05 per kwh.  Annual resource recovery benefit  was  based
on  chemical  savings  between a plant using regeneration as
compared to a plant discharging the spent bleach,

Ferrous  Sulfate Precipitation of_ Ferricyanide

The costs established in this section are for  a  system  to
cause  the  precipitation  of  ferricyanide bleach carryover
from  waste • fix.    The  costs,  as   determined   for   the
representative plants, are shown in Table VIII-7.
                          VIII-24

-------
                          TABI£ VIII-7
COSTS FOR FEBRQUS SfLFATE PRECIPITATION OF FERRICYANIDE FROM WASTE FIX
Plant Size
Typical Annual Production
(Film Only)
1,000 sq ^year
(1,000 sq ft/year)
1977 nmirtrs
Capital Investment Required
Annual Costs:
Capital Recovery
Operating and Maintenance
Energy and Power
•total
Annual Resource Recovery
Net Annual Cost (Benefit)
A
3.5 (37.51

4,600
920
600
10
1,530
—
1,530
B
8,1 (87.5)

6,500
1,300
1,220
20
2,540
—
2,540
C
35 (375)

9,200
1,830
4,490
60
6,380
—
6,380
D
174 (1,875)

22,200
4,400
21,400
300
26,100
—
26,100
Pollutant Parameter,
kg/1,000 sq m
Cyanide, Total
Effluent Without
Treatment
4.8
Effluent With
Treatment
1.3
                         VIII-25

-------
    Specific  Costing  References  and Rationale for Ferrous
    Sulfate Precipitation

The equipment required for ferrous sulfate precipitation  of
ferricyanide  from  waste fix is based on the equipment used
by plant 4550 which includes pumps, tanks, and mixers.   The
equipment  was sized for the representative plants according
to their relative production compared to  plant  4550.   The
capital  investment was determined from individual equipment
costs provided by  suppliers.   Related  capital  investment
costs    such    as    engineering,   drafting,   mechanical
installation, and electrical work were determined  from  the
following relationship:

         CN » C r exp 0.6

    where:

         CN  =  capital investment for representative plant,
              dollars
         C  = capital investment  incurred  by  plant  4550,
              dollars
         r   =  production  ratio of representative plant to
              plant 4550.

Operating  and  maintenance  and   power   costs   for   the
representative   plants   were   assumed   to   be  directly
proportional to these costs for plant 4550.

Evaporation  and  Associated  Technologies  to  Reduce   the
Discharge of Process Wastewater to a Minimum

Costs  were  derived for the reduction of process wastewater
discharge to a minimum from information  supplied  by  plant
7781   which   is   currently  using  the  technology.   The
technology, using a number of  techniques  as  described  in
Section   VII  to  minimize  the  hydraulic  load,  utilizes
multi-stage evaporation to reduce wastewater discharge.  The
costs, as determined for representative plants, are shown in
Table VIII-8.
                          VIII-26

-------
                    TABIE VIII-8

CESTS FOR EDUCTION OF PBOCESS WAffTEWATER TO A MTNIM3M
   BY ADVANCED CCNTBOLS PLUS MULTI-STATE EVAPORATION
'•. Plant Size
i
• Typical Annual Production,
| I", 000 sq m/year
1 (1,000 sq ft/year)
i
|
1 1977 Collars
i
| Capital Investment Pequired
i Annual Costs:
: Capital Secovery
i
| Operating and Maintenance
! aiergy and Power
Total
; Annual Sesource Recovery
j Net Annual Cost (Benefit)
A
35 (375)

103,000
20,500
21,000
400
41,900
4,200
37,700
B
81 (875)

155,000
30,800
21,000
400
52,200
9,900
42,300
C
350 (3,750)

239,000
47,600
43,100
1,800
92,500
42,400
50,100
D
1,740 (18,750)

406,000
80,800
74,700
8,700
164,200
212,000
(47,800)
                     VIII-27

-------
     Specific   Costing   References  and  Rationale  for    the
     Reduction  of. Process  Wastewater to a Minimum         	

 Specific  capital  investment,  operating,  energy and  power  and
 annual  resource   recovery  benefit  costs   were supplied by
 plant  7781.  The   information  included  costs  for  reverse
 osmosis   treatment  of  wash water,  developer regeneration by
 ion  exchange,  evaporation, and  the  reduction of  ammonia   in
 the  condensate.

 The  capital   investment  costs were estimated by plant 7781
 for  the representative  plants.  Costs for special analytical
 equipment  required for  process  control   are   included.    The
 equipment   includes    a  spectrophotometer   and an  atomic
 adsorption spectrometer.

 The  remainder  of  the costs  for  the  representative  plants
 were derived  by  linear scaling of  the  actual  costs incurred
 by plant 7781.  Labor   costs  for  a  full   time analytical
 chemist  was   added  to   the  operating  costs.   This  cost  is
 based on a salary  of $20,000  per  annum,  3 shifts per  day   in
 the  D plant, 2 shifts per day in  the C plant  and 1  shift per
 day  in the A and B plants.

 Treatment of Dichromate Bleach  Wastes

 Treatment  technologies,  along  with   the associated costs,
 have been established for the  electroplating   industry  for
 reduction  of  the  quantity  of chromium in wastewater.  The
 technology includes the  chemical   reduction   of  hexavalent
 chromium,   pH  adjustment  for  chromium  precipitation, and
 diatomaceous earth filtration.  It  is recommended that these
 technologies be  applied  to  after-dichromate   bleach  wash
 water mixed with the bleach overflow.

 The costs are given in Tables Viii-9 through VIII-12.   These
 costs  were  available  in  terms  of flow.   Film production
 levels comparable to these flows are included  in  the tables.
This determination is based on an  after-bleach  wash  water
 flow  of  38 liters per minute  (10 gallons per minute) and a
film processing rate of 173 square meters  per  hour  (1,865
square feet per hour).
                          VIII-28

-------
                 TABIE VIII-9

CCWTPOL AND TREA3MENT COSTS FOR HEXAVaLENT CHROMIUM
          REDUCTION - BOTCH TFEAIMENT
Flow, liters/hour
Annual Film Production,
1,000 sq id/year
(1,000 sq ft/year)
1977 Dollars
Capital Investment Required
Annual Costs:
Capital Cost
Operating and Maintenance
Energy and Power
Depreciation
Met Annual Cost (Benefit)
189
72 (780)
8,493
541
155
256
1,699
2,651
379
140 (1,500)
9,535
608
295
256
1,907
3,066
1,893
720 (7,750)
14,405
919
1,415
256
2,881
5,471
              VIII-29

-------
                  TAEI£ VHI-10

CONTROL AND TJEKDEW COSTS FOR HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM
         REDUCTION - CONTINUOUS TREATMENT
Flow, liters/ "hour
Annual Film Production
1,000 sq ir/year
(1,000 sq fVyear)
1977 Dollars
Capital Investment Required
Annual Costs:
Capital Cost
Operating and I^aintenance
Energy and Power
Depreciation
Net Annual Cost (Benefit)
3,785
1,400 (15,100)
20,416
1,303
1,086
256
4,083
6,728
7,570
2,900 (31,200)
21,538
1,374
1,375
256
4,308
7,313
18,925
7,200 (77,500)
24,C03
1,531
2,089
256
4,301
8,677
                VIII-30

-------
«,«,«.»>«»•«

-------

-------
NON-WATER QUALITY ASPECTS

It  is  important  to  consider the impact of each treatment
process on air, noise, solid waste, and radiation  pollution
of  the  environment  to  recognize  and avoid the potential
development of an adverse environmental  impact  upon  these
other media.

None of the control or treatment technologies considered for
the  photoprocessing  industry  have any known potential for
air, noise, or radiation pollution exterior  to  the  plant.
There could be possible in-plant air pollution problems from
the  use  of  ozone or improper use of sulfide precipitation
compounds.  Proper use and monitoring equipment will control
any  potential  hazard  to   plant   personnel.    Ozonation
generators   and  reverse  osmosis  units  create  high  but
non-hazardous  noise  levels   in   the  area  close  to   the
equipment.   This  problem  can  be  alleviated  with proper
location and enclosure of the  equipment.

The major potential non-water  environmental  impact from this
industry   is   the  potential   generation  of  solid  wastes.
Solids  generated  from  silver  recovery  are not a problem
because of  the  obvious  economic recovery  value  of  the
silver.  Waste sludge from the precipitation of  ferrocyanide
wastes   presents  a  solid  waste disposal  problem.   One
multi-plant company   processes this   sludge  at  a  central
location   to   reclaim the ferricyanide.  Plants  which do not
reprocess  this sludge will have  to  dispose  of  the  solid
waste   in   an  approved  landfill  or  other environmentally
acceptable  manner.   Solid  wastes    generated   from   the
treatment   of  waste  dichromate bleach have  no known market.
These  wastes must  be  disposed  of in an approved  landfill   or
other   environmentally   acceptable manner.   Solid wastes are
also  generated from  the  plant  using evaporation  to eliminate
process water  discharge.  The  plant reports  that the  silver
content  is  high   enough to make  it acceptable  to a smelter
for silver reclamation.
                           VIII-33

-------

-------
                         SECTION IX


                      ACKNOWLEDGMENTS


The  Environmental  Protection  Agency  was  aided  in   the
preparation   of  this  Guidance  Document  by  Versar  Inc.
Versar's effort was managed by Mr.  Edwin  Abrams  with  Mr.
Lawrence G. Davies serving as principal investigator.

Mr.  Richard  Kinch  and  Mr.  John  Newbrough  of the EPA's
Effluent Guidelines  Division  served  as  Project  Officers
during   the  preparation  of  this  document.   Mr.  Robert
Schaffer, Director, Effluent Guidelines  Division,  and  Mr.
Gary E. Stigall, Branch Chief, Effluent Guidelines Division,
Inorganic Chemicals Branch, offered guidance and suggestions
during this project.

Appreciation  is  extended  to  the  National Association of
Photographic  Manufacturers,   Inc.   and   the   individual
companies  and  plants  that participated in and contributed
data for the formulation of this document.
                           IX-1

-------

-------
                         SECTION X


                        BIBLIOGRAPHY
American  National  Standard:  Dimensions  of  Aerial   Film
    Spools.   American  National  Standards Institute, Inc.,
    New York, New York, 1972.

American National Standard: Dimensions for Film in Rolls for
    Phototypesetting or  Photocomposing  Devices,  or  Both.
    American  National  Standards Institute, Inc., New York,
    New York, 1972.

American National  Standard:  Dimensions  for  Graphic  Arts
    Sheet  and  Roll  Films.   American  National  Standards
    Institute, Inc., New York, New York, 1973.

American  National  Standard:  Dimensions   for   Industrial
    Radiographic  Sheet  and  Roll Films.  American National
    Standards Institute, Inc., New York, New York, 1973.

American National Standard:  Dimensions  for  135-size  Film
    Magazines  and  Film for 135-size Still-Picture Cameras.
    American National Standards Institute, Inc.,  New  York,
    New York, 1976.

American  National  Standard:  Dimensions  for  Photographic
    Films   in   Rolls   for   Recording   Instruments   and
    Miscellaneous   Uses.    American   National   Standards
    Institute, Inc., New York, New York, 1973.

American  National  Standard:  Dimensions  for  Professional
    Sheet  and  Roll  Films.   American  National  Standards
    Institute, Inc., New York, New York, 1973.

American National Standard: Dimensions for Unperforated  and
    Perforated Photographic Film in Rolls, Including Leaders
    and  Trailers,  for  Aerial  and Related Uses.  American
    National Standards Institute, Inc., New York, New  York,
    1976.

American  National Standard: Specifications for Photographic
    Film  for  Archival  Records,  Silver-Gelatin  Type,  on
                            X-l

-------
    Polyester  Base.  American National Standards Institute,
    New York, New York.

American National Standard: Specifications for  Photographic
    Film  for  Arch ival  Records,  Si1ver-Gelat in  Type,  on
    Cellulose  Ester  Base.   American  National   Standards
    Institute, New York, New York.

American    National   Standard:   Test   Method   for   the
    Determination of Ferro- and Ferricyanide in Photographic
    Processing  Effluents.   American   National   Standards
    Institute, Inc., New York, New York, 1976.

Arthur  D.  Little, Inc.  Economic Analysis of Interim Final
    Effluent  Guidelines  for  the  Photographic  Processing
    Industry.   U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency, April
    1976.

Bard, C. C., J. J. Murphy, D. L. Stone, and C.  J.  Terhaar.
    Silver  in  Photoprocessing Effluents.  Journal of Water
    Pollution Control Federation, 48{2):389-394, 1976.

Bober,  Thomas  W.  and  Thomas  J.  Dagon.   Ozonation   of
    Photographic   Processing   Wastes.   Journal  of  Water
    Pollution Control Federation, 47(8):2114-2129, 1975.

Buyers, Archie G., et al.  Development  and  Application  of
    Ion  Exchange Silver Recovery System.  University of New
    Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, May 1974.  72 pp.

Carroll,  John   S.    Amphoto   Lab    Handbook.    American
    Photographic  Book  Publishing  Company,  Inc., New York,
    New York, 1970.

Color Print.  Modern Photography, 43(2):92-93, 118-121,  124,
    134-142,  176,  1979.

Cooley, Austin C.  Regeneration and Disposal  of Photographic
    Processing   Solutions   Containing   Hexacyanoferrate.
    Journal of Applied Photographic Engineering, 2(2):61-64,
    1976.

Cooley,  Austin  C.  and  Thomas  J.  Dagon.  Current Silver
    Recovery  Practices   in  the   Photographic   Processing
                            X-2

-------
    Industry.   Journal of Applied Photographic Engineering,
    2(1):36-41, 1976.

CPAC - Pollution  Abatement  Division.   Wastewater  Control
    Program  for:   Naval  Intel1igence  Support Center.   No.
    N62477-74-C-0308, Leicester, New York.  70 pp.

Dagon, Thomas J.  Biological Treatment of  Photo  Processing
    Effluents.    Journal   of   Water   Pollution   Control
    Federation, 45 (10):2123-2135.

Dagon, Thomas  J.    Processing  Chemistry  of  Bleaches  and
    Secondary    Processing    Solutions    and   Applicable
    Regeneration    Techniques.     Journal    of    Applied
    Photographic Engineering, 2(1):42-45, 1976.

Daignault,    Louis    G.     Pollution   Control   in   the
    Photoprocessing Industry through Regeneration and Reuse.
    Journal of Applied Photographic Engineering, 3(2):93-96,
    1977.

Degenkolb, David  J.  and  Fred  J.   Scobey.   Handling  and
    Control   of   Chemicals   in  a  Modern  Motion-Picture
    Laboratory.  Journal of the Society  of  Motion  Picture
    and Television Engineers, 81(6):465-469, 1972.

Degenkolb,  David  J.  and  Fred  J. Scobey.  Monitoring the
    Processing   Chemical   Costs   and   Effluents   of    a
    Motion-Picture  Processing  Laboratory.   Journal of the
    Society of  Motion  Picture  and  Television  Engineers,
    84:599-603, 1975.

Degenkolb,  David  J.  and  Fred J.  Scobey.  Silver Recovery
    from Photographic Wash Waters by  Ion Exchange.   Journal
    of   the   Society  of  Motion  Picture  and  Television
    Engineers, 86(2):65-68, 1977.

Battelle Columbus Laboratories.   Development  Document  for
Interim Final Effluent
    Limitation    Guidelines   and   Proposed   New   Source
    Performance Standards for the Metal Finishing Segment of
    the    Electroplating     Point     Source     Category.
    EPA-440/l-75/040a, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
    Washington, D.C.  April 1975.  235 pp.
                            X-3

-------
Development    Document   for   Proposed   Existing   Source
    Pretreatment  Standards  for  the  Electroplating  Point
    Source  Category.   EPA-440/1-78/085, U.S. Environmental
    Protection Agency, February 1978.  532 pp.

Eastman Kodak Company.   Aerobic  Photodegradation  of  X(N)
    delates of (Ethylenedinitrilo) Tetraacetic Acid (EDTA).
    Environmental  Science  and Technology, 9{12):1035-1038,
    1975.

Eastman Kodak Company.  Data Release.  No. J-9X.  Rochester,
    New York, 1978.  2 pp.

Eastman  Kodak  Company.    Kodak   Photographic   Products,
    1975-1976.  Rochester, New York, 1976.

Eastman  Kodak  Company.   1976  Index to Kodak Information.
    No. L-5.  Rochester, New York, 1976.  46 pp.

Eastman  Kodak  Company.   Sampling   and   Flow-Measurement
    Methods.  No. J-50.  Rochester, New York, 1976.  27 pp.

Eastman  Kodak Company.  Silver Recovery with Kodak Chemical
    Recovery Cartridge Type  P.  No.  J-9.   Rochester,  New
    York, November 1979.

Eastman  Kodak  Company.   "Low-F1ow  Prewash"  Means  Pr i nt
    Stability  Compromise,  Current   Information   Summary,
    September 1979.  CIS-25.  Rochester, New York.

Eastman  Kodak  Company.   Silver  Recovery  with  the Kodak
    Chemical Recovery Cartridge Type 3, January  1980,  J9A.
    Rochester, New York.

Eastman  Kodak Company.  Recovering Silver from Photographic
    Materials, March  1980, J10.  Rochester, New York.

Eastman  Kodak  Company.   Potential   Silver   Yield   from
    Photographic  Products, December 1979, J10A.  Rochester,
    New York.

Eastman Kodak Company.  Disposal of Photographic  Processing
    Effluents and Solutions, January 1973, J-28.  Rochester,
    New York.
                            X-4

-------
Eastman  Kodak  Company.  BOD5_ and COD of Kodak Photographic
    Chemicals, December 1973, J-41 .   Rochester, New York.

Eastman Kodak "Company.   The  Regeneration  of  Ferricyanide
    Bleach  Using  Ozone,  September 1974, J-43.  Rochester,
    New York.

Eastman  Kodak  Company.   In  Support  of  Clean  Water
    Disposing  of  Effluents from Film Processing, September
    1979, J-44.  Rochester, New York.

Eastman Kodak Company.  The Filter Press for the  'Filtration
    of  Insoluble  Photographic  Processing  Wastes, January
    1973, J-45.  Rochester, New York.

Eastman  Kodak  Company.   The   Biological   Treatment   of
    Photographic  Processing  Effluents,  August  1975, J-46.
    Rochester, New York.

Eastman Kodak Company.  Chemical Composition of Photographic
    Processing Solutions, April 1975, J-47.  Rochester,  New
    York.

Eastman Kodak Company.  Silver in Photoprocessing Effluents,
    July 1976, J-51.  Rochester, New York.

Eastman  Kodak Company.  Disposal of Photographic Processing
    Solutions for the Small User,  1976,  J-52.   Rochester,
    New York.

Eastman  Kodak  Company.   The  Use of Water in Photographic
    Processing, March 1978, J-53.  Rochester, New York.

Eastman Kodak Company.  Water Conservation  in  Photographic
    Processing, July  1973, S-39.  Rochester, New  York.

Eastman  Kodak  Company.  Using Kodak Ektaprint 2 Bleach-Fix
    and Replenisher NR  in Continuous Color Print  Processors.
    Data Release Z-122G, Revised March 1980.  Rochester, New
    York.

Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology,  Second  Edition,   Vol.
    15.  Wiley, New York, New York,  1968.  pp.  371-389.
                            X-5

-------
Ericson, Franklyn A.  Effluent Sampling and Flow Measurement
    for the Photoprocessor.  Journal of Applied Photographic
    Engineering, 2(2):51-60, 1976.

EROS  Data  Center.   Processing  Information  for EROS Data
    Center  Waste  Treatment  System.   No.  OPL4-7.    U.S.
    Geological Survey, 1975.

An  Evaluation  of the Mead Technology Laboratories Aqua-Fix
    Waste  Disposal   System.    Directorate   of   Avionics
    Engineering, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio, August 1976.

Fatora,   David   A.   Wash  Water  Recycling  by  Catalytic
    Oxidation of  Thiosulfates  and  Sulfites.   Journal  of
    Applied Photographic Engineering, 2(4):227-228, 1976.

Fields,  Alfred  E.   Reducing  Wash  Water  Consumption  in
    Photographic    Processing.     Journal    of    Applied
    Photographic Engineering, 2(3):128-133, 1976.

Focal Encyclopedia of Photography, Vol. I.  Focal Press, New
    York, New York, 1965.  pp. 278-281.

Focal  Encyclopedia  of  Photography, Vol.  II.  Focal Press,
    New York, New York,  1965.  pp.  1672-1675,  1185-1187.

Gale, Robert 0., and Allan L. Williams.   Factors  Affecting
    Color Film Dye Stability: Relating Printing Problems and
    Release  Print  Quality,  Journal of  the SMPTE, Vol. 72,
    October 1963.  pp. 804-8-09.

SPSE  Handbook  of  Photographic  Science  and Engineering.
    Woodlief Thomas, Jr.,  ed.  Wiley-Interscience, New  York,
    New York, 1973.  pp. 609-622.

Haderer,    P.   A.   and    J.    A.   Defilippi.    Reducing
    Photoprocessing  Wastes  through  Reuse and  Recycling.
    Industrial Photography,  June  1977.  pp. 22-23, 42-45.

Hendrickson,  Thomas  N.   The  Zero-Discharge Law  and the
    Motion-Picture  Film  Processing  Industry.   Journal of the
    Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers,  July
    1973.
                             X-6

-------
Hendrickson, Thomas N.  and Louis G. Daignault.  Treatment of
    Complex  Cyanide  Compounds  for  Reuse   or   Disposal.
    EPA-R2-73-269,  U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency,
    Washington, D.C., June 1973.  151 pp.
Image   Technology.     Journal   of
    Engineering, 4(2):93-96, 1978.
Applied   Photographic
In-Process  Pollution  Abatement.   EPA  625/3-73-002,  U.S.
    Environmental  Protection  Agency  Technology   Transfer
    Seminar Publication, July 1973.  69 pp.

Iwano,  H.,  T.  Hatano,  S.  Matsushita,  and  K.  Shirasu.
    Regeneration   of   Ferric-EDTA-Thiosulfate   Bleach-Fix
    Solution  by  Anion-Exchange Resins.  Journal of Applied
    Photographic Engineering, 2(2):65-69, 1976.
Johnson,  D.  W.   Precipitation  Techniques.
    reference unknown.  17 pp.
           Publication
Kennedy,  David  C.   Prediction of Ion-Exchange Sorption of
    Metal Ions from Complex Ion Formation  Data.   Presented
    at 171st National ACS Meeting, New York, New York, April
    1976.  32 pp.

Kennedy,  David  C.,  Mark  A.  Kimler, and Carol A. Hammer.
    Functional  Design  of   a   Zero-Discharge   Wastewater
    Treatment   System   for   the   National   Center   for
    Toxicological Research.  Presented at  the  31st  Annual
    Purdue Industrial Waste Conference, May 1976.  19 pp.

Kleppe, J. Wesley.  Practical Application of an Ion Exchange
    Method for Color-Developer Reuse.  Journal of the SMPTE,
    88:168-170.  March 1979.

Kleppe,  J.  Wesley.   The  Application  of  an Ion Exchange
    Method for Color Developer  Reuse,  Journal  of  Applied
    Photographic  Engineering,  Vol.  5, No. 3, Summer 1979.
    pp. 132-135.

LaPerle, Robert L.   Removal  of  Metals  from  Photographic
    Effluent  by  Sodium  Sulfide Precipitation.  Journal of
    Applied Photographic Engineerins, 2(3):134-146, 1976.
                            X-7

-------
Lorenzo, George A. and Michael A.  Claprood.   Treatment  of
    Photographic   Wash   Waters   for  Reuse  or  Disposal.
    Presented  at   SPSE   14th   Annual   Fall   Symposium,
    Washington, D.C., October 1974.  20 pp.

The Manufacture and Use of Selected Inorganic Cyanides, Task
    III.   EPA  560/6-75-012,  U.S. Environmental Protection
    Agency, Washington, D.C., January 1976.  213 pp.

Mees,  C.   E.  Kenneth.   The  Theory  of  the  Photograph i c
    Process.   The  Macmillan  Company,  New York, New York.
    pp. 1047-1087.

Mina, R.  Silver Recovery  from  Photographic  Effluents  By
    Ion-Exchange  Methods.   Presented at the SPSE Symposium
    on Photofinishing  in the 1980's, March 21, 1980.

National Association  of  Photographic  Manufacturers,  Inc.
    American  National  Standard  on Photographic Processing
    Effluents.  Harrison, New York, April 1975.  42 pp.

National Association  of  Photographic  Manufacturesr,  Inc.
    Survey Form.  May  1976.  23 pp.

Oregon  State  University.  Toxicity to Fish of Cyanides and
    Related  Compounds:  A  Review,   U.S.   Department   of
    Commerce, April  1976.  PB 253-528.

Owerbach,  Daniel.   The  Instability  of  Free  Cyanide  in
    Photographic Processing Effluents.  Journal  of  Applied
    Photographic Engineering, 4(2):72-76,  1978.

Pathways  of  Photoprocessing  Chemicals   in  Publicly Owned
    Treatment Works.   National Association  of  Photographic
    Manufacturers,  Inc.   1977.   91  pp.

Photo  Film  Achieves  Zero  Waste  Discharge.  Chemical and
    Engineering News Magazine, July 1978.

Photographic  Processing  Effluent  Control.    Journal   of
    Applied Photographic Engineering,  4(2):62-71,  1978.

Photo   Processing   Sludge:   New  Comstock  Lode?    Sludge
    Magazine, January-February 1979.   pp.  22-26.
                             X-8

-------
Ryckman/Edgerley/Tomlinson     and     Associates,      Inc.
    Treatability     and     Functional    Design    of    a
    Physical-Chemical  Wastewater   Treatment   System   for
    Printing  and  Photodeveloping  Plant.  Presented at the
    31st Annual  Purdue  Industrial  Wastewater  Conference,
    West Lafayette, Indiana, May 1976.  23 pp.

Shemesh,  Alvin  and  Norman  Ackerman.   Medical Hazards of
    Photography.    Industrial   Medicine    and    Surgery,
    33:807-812, 1964.

Sittig,  Marshall.   Pollutant Removal Handbook.  Noyes Data
    Corporation, Park Ridge, New Jersey,  1973.  pp. 155-163,
    462-465.

Supplement B: Volumes I, II and III.  Guardian,  Berkey  and
    Kodak   Data,   Effluent   Limitations   Guidelines  and
    Miscellaneous data and references.  1974.

Supplement B: Volume IV, Parts 1  and  2.   Industry  Survey
    Data.  1974.

Supplement B: Volume V, Parts 1 and 2.  References.   1974.

Supplement  B:  Volume VI, Parts 1 and 2.  NPDES permits and
    applications.    Additional   discharge   permits    and
    applications.  1974.

Supplement  B:  Volumes  VII  and VIII.   NAPM,  Environmental
    Effect of Photoprocessing Chemicals,  Volumes  I  and  II,
    Harrison, New York, 1974.

U.S.    Air   Force.    Recovery   of  Silver  from  Expended
    Photographic Material.  No. F42600-73-D-1463.  May 1972.

U.S.   Department  of  Commerce.    1972  Census  of  Selected
    Service   Industries.    August   1975,  September  1975,
    December 1975.

U.S.    Environmental   Protection   Agency.     Pretreatment
    Standards   for  Ammonia,  Phenols  and  Cyanides.  March
    1976.  142  pp.
                            X-9

-------
Waste  Treatment.   EPA  625/3-73-002,  U.S.   Environmental
    Protection    Agency    Technology    Transfer   Seminar
    Publication, July 1973.  47 pp.

West,  Lloyd  E.   Water  Quality  Criteria.    Photographic
    Science and Engineering, 9(6):398-413, 1965.

Westin,  R.  F.   Development  Document  for  Interim  Final
    Effluent Limitations, Guidelines and Proposed New Source
    Performance Standards for  the  Photographic  Processing
    Subcategory.    U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency,
    Washington, D.C., June 1976.

Wolfman,   Lydia.    1975-1976   Wolfman   Report   on   the
    Photographic Industry in the United States.  ABC Leisure
    Magazines, Inc., New York, New York, 1976.  96 pp.

A Zero Discharge Wastewater Treatment System.  Environmental
    Science and Technology, 12(9):1004-1006, 1978.
                           X-10

-------
                         SECTION XI
                          GLOSSARY
aeration: The addition of air to a liquid.  This is done  by
    pumping  the  liquid  into  the  air  or by bubbling air
    through it via sparging tubes.  Aeration is used as part
    of  the  ferric  EDTA  bleach  regeneration  process  in
    photographic  processing.   It can be used for reduction
    of oxygen demand in wastewater.

acid rinse: A solution, usually dilute acetic acid, used  as
    a stop bath following development.

anion:  The ion in an electrolyte which carries the negative
    charge and migrates toward the anode  under the influence
    of a potential difference.

automatic wash water controls: Automatic  solenoid  operated
    shutoff  devices which completely stop  the flow of water
    into the processor when  it  is not  being  used,  thereby
    avoiding excessive wash  water flows.

biochemical  oxygen  demand   (BODS):  A   measurement  of  the
    amount of dissolved oxygen  an effluent  will consume from
    water over a  five-day period  of  time.
 biodegradable:  A substance capable  of  being  broken
     organisms  into  simpler entities.
down  by
 black   and   white  film:   This  film  consists of a support,
     usually a plastic film which  is  coated  with  a  light
     sensitive  emulsion  and an outer protective layer.   The
     emulsion is  adhered  to  the  supporting  base  with  a
     special  layer  called  a  sub.    The emulsion contains:
     gelatin, silver  salts  of  bromide,   iodide,  chloride,
     sensitizers,  hardeners, and emulsion plasticizers.

 bleach-fix  or blix: A solution used in some color processing
     that functions both as a bleach and as a fix.

 bleach:  A   step in color film processing whereby the silver
     image is converted back to silver halides.
                            XI-1

-------
 cation:  The ion in an electrolyte which carries the positive
     charge and which migrates toward the cathode  under  the
     influence of a potential difference.

 chelating  agents:  A  class  of chemical compounds that can
     form complex chemical  species.   Some  of  the  compounds
     are   used as bleaching agents when complexed with ferric
     ions and as sequestering agents  in  the  isolation  and
     removal of metallic ions.

 chemical  oxygen  demand  (COD):   An  analytical  method for
     measuring the oxygen demand  of an effluent.   This method
     is faster than the BOD5  test and responsive to a broader
     range of components.

 chemical prewash:  A salt bath  between the fix  and final  wash
     which chemically removes the fix from the  emulsion at  a
     faster  rate  than  can   be   done  by washing,   thereby
     reducing the after-fix wash  water time and volume.

 chlorination:  The addition   of   chlorine  to   wastewater  to
     cause breakdown of certain compounds by oxidation.

 chromium:   A  metallic  element   whose  compounds  are used in
     some photographic  processes  as   bleaching  or   hardenino
     agents.                                                 *
clarification:   The   process  of
    suspended solids by settling.
removing  turbidity  and
clearing bath:  A  processing  solution  that  removes  most
    residual  fixer  from  processed  film or paper prior to
    washing, minimizing the water requirement.

color couplers: A group of  organic  chemicals  which  react
    with  the  oxidized components of the developers to form
    color dyes.  They are either incorporated  in  the  film
    emulsion at the time of manufacture or they are included
    in the color developing solution.

color  film:  Color  film has three separate light sensitive
    emulsion  layers,   which   after   inclusion   of   the
    appropriate  sensitizing  dyes,   record  an image of the
    blue light components on  one  layer,   the  green  light
                           XI-2

-------
   components   on  another, and the red  light components on
   the third layer.
                                            film  process
                                            added  during
color reversal  (DC) process:  A color reversal
    in   which   the   color    couplers   are
    development.

rolor reversal  (1C) process:  A color reversal film and paper
    procels in  ihlch the color couplers  which form the color
    dye image are  incorporated into the  emulsion  layers  at
    the time of manufacture.
complex
         cyanide:   This  term  refers  to  a  complex   ion
conservation:   Methods  applied  to  make  maximum  use  of
    processing chemicals and water and to keep the  quantity
    of effluent discharged to a minimum.
                  •ssrs    .
              . •ssEsms-ss. -;•«.«„
     starting end of the material  to be processed
     to a  leader  which  guides  the  material  through
     machine.
                                                       the
conventional   silver    recovery:    The   use  of  metallic
    replacement or electrolytic  methods  or both  for  the
    recovery of silver  from fix solutions.

countercurrent  washing:  A  method of washing  film or paper
    uling a segmented  tank system in which water  is cascaded
    progressively from one tank segment to the  next   counter
    to the movement of the film or paper.

develop:  A step in photoprocessing whereby the latent  image
    is made visible in a developer solution.

developer :  A  chemical  processing  solution  chaining   a
    developing  agent.   This   solution  converts the  exposed
    portions  of  the  photographic  emulsion   to   silver,
    creating  images of metallic silver.
                           XI-3

-------
              agents:  *hese Photographic materials  usually  are
     groups

     other,

     (metol),




 dlChreverLl1an^^t "f??h USed in  some  black  an<*  white
     reversal and color film processing.
  ip and dunk: An automatic processing machine whereby strips


     tanks and he!d for^hfapproprfatftfrne6 photoProcessin9




 direthedi^tedg^ateI.diSCharge °f ^—ter to  waters  of
     o      S°'idS:  Solid  matter  ^ effluent that will not
     settle out or separate with filtration.
fh
the
                °r solu"on carried into another solution  by
              or paper being processed.              unun  Dy
 drag-out:   Water  or  solution carried out of the orocessina
     tank by the film or paper being processed.     Processing
               -            steP  which   involves  drying  the
               ic  film or  paper in  a  dust-free atmosphere.



                                       ""idi-d
EDTA  (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid): A  chelatinq

               e-bleafll and  ble^h-fix  solutions9


               hard Sa^r. ^^^  *° S^St^


effluent: Liquid waste leaving its source.


electrolytic silver recovery: The  removal  of  silver  from

    silver-bearing  solutions  by  application  of  a direct

    current to electrodes in Resolution  causing  metalnc
    silver to deposit on the cathode.            9  metallic



elution:  (l)  The  process of washing out, or removino with

    the use of a solvent.   (2)  In an ion exchangfprocLs it
                           XI-4

-------
              as
                 the stripping of  adsorbed  ions      an.ion
equaHzation:  The  collection of waste.ater in^ta^  or^onds

                                    other treatment steps.
    waste  containing the
                           •II
ferricyanide:  This.ion, usually
    ferricyanide,  is used as a

    Sanfde S ^u^iTf^o
    in the film emulsions.

ferricyanide bleach:  A processing  solution
                          ^       is  removed in  the
                                         form  of  potassium
                                         «         metallic
                                          processes..  Eerri-
                                       as !t oxidi.es sUver
     step.
  "'1SSS.S
                                   ssr.
    sodium  thiosulfate.

flocculation:   The  addition
    ferric  chloride or
                               of
                                                -h

                                          thereby  increasing
   gas-burst  agitation:  This  is  the
       automatic  agitation  £°""°pdinat  controlled  intervals
       machines.   Gas  is  rel eased  at  cont    ^ ^
       through tiny holes in a distribute  p      ^^ during

       feleasl pfovfde^the'rfndo, agitation  pattern  necessary
       for uniform results.
                             XI-5

-------
    allow for
hardfhnaT
    film from damage during  or
    hardeners  are  potassium
    chromium
                                                            tO
i0n:charS°m °r 9r°UP  °f  at°ms  Possessing
                                                   protect the
                                          Pro?ssi
-------
navigable waters: See waters of the United States.

negative process: A process which yields a negative image on
    film or paper of the original subject.

                                             .
    process  water  as   it does not  come  in  contact with raw
    materials or  the product.

 POTW:  Publicly  owned treatment works (45  FR  33423).

 NPDES: See National Pollutant Discharge Elimination  System.

 on-site treatment:  Treatment of  effluent   Performed   at  its
     source,   prior  to  discharge  into a sewage system or a
     receiving body of  water.
involved
                                                          the
     treatment,  oxidation  usually  is
     breakdown of many substances.

             The  process of using ozone (03) as an oxidizing
     aen  to oxidize and degrade chemical constituents in an
     effluent or to regenerate ferricyanide bleach.

 ozone: A powerful gaseous oxidizing agent (03);   it  can  be
     generated by a high voltage discharge across  a stream of
     air or oxygen.

 persulfate:  A  strong  oxidizing  agent  used  to regenerate
     ferrocyanide to  ferricyanide  in bleaches.

 PH: A numerical value describing  the  acidity {low pH number)
     and alkalinity  (high pH number) of  a  solution.
  polyelectrolytes:  Synthetic  chemicals  
      speed  the  removal of solids from wastewater by
      suspended particles to coagulate.   They can  be  anionic
                             XI-7

-------
[-  charge,
charge) ].
                  nonionic
(+  and  - charge)  or cationic (+
pri.,r, tr.,t..nt, Th. r..»v,l of ..t.rl.l  th.t  floats  „
               machines,  and in ar4a washdown
   processing slutbeing reclaed
                                              »f  by-p.oducts

                                        C°mp°nents   °f

                          XI-8

-------
settling:   The  concentration  of  participate   matter   in
    wastewater  by  allowing suspended solids to sink to the
    bottom.
                                             which
short  stop:  A  step  in  photoprocessing
                  whereby   the   basic  activators  in
                      neutralized   to    prevent    further
    development
    developer   are
    development.
follows
    the
silver  halide: Silver halide is an inorganic salt of silver
     in combination  with  elements  from  Group  ™  of  the
     Periodic Table.  Silver halide salts used in photography
     are  silver chloride, silver bromide, and silver iodide.
     Upon exposure to light, silver halide   crystals  undergo
     an   internal  change  making  them  capable of subsequent
     reduction  to metallic silver by   appropriate  developing
     agents.

 silver   recovery:   Removal  of  silver from  used photographic
     processing solutions  and  materials  so   it  can   be   made
     available  for reuse.

 spray  washing:   A   method   of  washing film or paper using a
     spray  rather  than   an  immersion  tank   as   a  means  of
     conserving water.

 stabilizer:   A   chemical   bath,   usually  the   last  in  a
     processing  cycle,  that  imparts  greater   life  to   a
     processed  photographic  film  or  paper  through one of
     several preserving steps.

 saueeaee:  A piece of flexible material or a thin  stream  of
 squeegee.  A p           Qn Qne or both sides of photographic
     film or paper as it comes out of a  tank  of  processing
     solution.   This  reduces the amount of solution carried
     over.

 surface water: See waters of the United States.

 suspended  solids:  Undissolved  matter  carried   in  effluent
     that may  settle out  in a clarifier.

 total   organic  carbon   (TOO:  A  measure of the  amount of
     carbon in a sample originating from organic  matter.   Tne
                             XI-9

-------
    test is run by burning  the
    carbon dioxide produced.
sample  and  measuring  the
wash:  A  water  wash  is a step in photoprocessing removing
    residual processing chemicals absorbed in  the  emulsion
    or substrate.

waters  of the United States: All waters which are currently
    used, used in the past, or may be used,  for  interstate
    or foreign commerce,  including all waters subject to ebb
    and  flow  of the tide.  Also includes intrastate lakes
    rivers, streams, mud flats, and wetlands (44  FR  33300,
    "^T -T *X W O TT rf£ *f ) *

    ^ ?ischar9e:  A goal for 1985 as set by the Federal Water
    Pollution Act of 1972.   This means that the discharge of
    pollutants intojthe navigable waters will be  eliminated
    by 1985.       &
                          XI-10

-------
          APPENDIX A




TELEPHONE CONTACT SURVEY MEMO
              A-l

-------
                                                                17 January 1977
                   Versar Inc., EPA Contract No. 68-01-3273
              FILE MEMO - TELEPHONE CONTACT - PHOTO PROCESSING
Versar Engineer

Time
Person Contacted:
Name
Goirpany

Phone
A.  Process

1.  What types of processes are used?

     (a) black and white:  negative process
                          reversal process
                                        Date
                                        File No.
                                        Title
                                        Address: Street
                                         still filnft
                                                         State
                                                              Zip Code
                                                            movie%
       papers
     (b) color: negative process
               reversal  (couplers in emulsion)
               reversal  (couplers in developer)

     (c) Other:
          explain	___^
 2.  Are machine processes used?
    For which processes? 	
                                   Yes
                                                    No
Partially
 3.   Is replenishment used?  Yes

     Which processes?
                                          Partially     Continuous     Batch
                                                             No
                                                                Partially
4.  Are chemical recovery and recycle methods used? Yes
    (a) Silver recovery - Yes  No   Metallic    Electro-   Off-   Rscycle   Discharge
                                    Tteplacement lytic

        From: Fix	       	
              bleach-fix	       	
              washvster
                                                            site
(b)  Bleach regeneration: Yes
    Ferricyanide:  Method	
          Processes used	
                                         No
                                                    Partially
         Ferric EDTA:  Method
               Processes used
         Other:
                                       A-2

-------
    (c)  Other  (such as cooler, developer, etc.
              Processes used       	
                                                                    Not used
5.  Use of squeegees:  Everywhere recommended	Partial  use _
6.  Estimated Process Water Usage: less than 1,000 gpd	;  1,000 to 9,999 gpd
    10,000 to 99,999 gpd	; more than 100,000 gpd	.
7.
    Estimated production: less than 1,000 sq. ft./day
    day	; 3,000 sq. ft./day to 20,000 sq. ft./day _
    more than 20,000 sq. ft./day	.
                                                          ;  1,000 to 2,999 sq.  ft./
B.  Wastewater
1.  Other than recovery or recycle, is process wastewater treated before
    discharge?  Yes 	  No	
     (a)  If yes, how?		
     (b)  Does the treated  stream contain all the process wastewater? Yes
     (c)  Does the treated  stream contain any non-process wastewater?
         Sanitary	Non-contact cooling	Boiler	Other	
 2.   Where are the wastewater streams discharged?
                                    Contains
               Stream 001  	_	
               Stream 002	
               Stream 003        	
                                                            Discharged to
 3.
     Do you have a discharge permit for any stream?
     Stream(s)	
                                  	state
                                        Corp.Eng.Appl,
                                                                  Number
                                        NPDES
                                        Other  (POTW)
     What parameters are limited?
                                                                             No
                                        A-3

-------
  4.  Is analytical data available and for what period of tine?
              N°	  Yes	  Period
  5.  Are sewer user charges employed by local monicipality?  If so, what are
      charges and basis (flow, pollutant, etc.)
  C.  General
  1.  Conmsnts:
 2.  Pfould the plant be agreeable to an engineering visit by an H>A Representative?
     Who should be contacted
 3.   What type of customer or service provided?
     (a)   Amateur
     (b)  Professional
     (c)  Commercial  (Art, printing, etc.)
     (d)  Conrnercial  (Movie, T.V.)
     (e)  Studio  (portrait, school)
     (f)  Other
4.  Are toners used?
    If so what type
                                      A-4

-------
          APPENDIX B




LONG-TERM PLANT EFFLUENT DATA
              B-l

-------
             LONG-TERM DATA FOR PLANT 6208
KEY:  AG79
      CN79
      CR79
Effluent Silver Concentration, mg/liter,
mid-1974 to July 1979
Effluent Total Cyanide Concentration, mg/liter,
mid-1974 to July 1979
Effluent Total Chromium Concentration, mg/liter,
mid-1974 to July 1979
LIS .ZAISSE
AG79
0.39
1.4
0.22
0.01
0,38
0.14

0.32
1.4
0.25
0.317
0.43
0.94

0,68
0.52
0.7
0,23
0.48
0.5

0,93
0.21
0.88
0.16
1.2
0.2

0.15
0.17
0.9
0.19
0.08
0,16

0.27
0,05
1.22
0.13
0.53
0.16

0.59
0.57
0.32
0.32
0.33
0.17

0.34
0.86
0.032
0.17
0.2


0.31
1.2
0.139
0.54
0.92


0.5
1,2
0.2
0.22
0.14

CN 79
0.005
0.005
0.005
0,14
0.08
0,01

0,005
0,005
67.4*
u.ul
1.12
0.01

0.005
O.OOS
0.06
0*26
0.01
0.01

0.008
O.OOS
0.005
0,14
0,57
0.01

0.005
0.005
0.005
0.21
0.01
0.01

0.005
0.005
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01

0.029
0.005
0.005
0.032
0.04
0.01

0,005
0,005
1.8
0.104
0.01


0.006
0.005
0.01
1,75
0.01


0.005
0.005
0.28
0.04
0.08

CR 79
3.09
3,0
8.1
1,76
1.1
2.6

4.73
2.7
4.4
4.55
2.6
5.0

3.11
1.84
4.2
0,6
4.1
2.1

5.93
2.8
3.31
0.24
3.4
4.3

3.56
2.91
6.4
0.35
0.8
2.8

4.59
4.38
3.06
2.92
3.7
4,7

4.11
5.9
8.2
1.25
6.6
2.3

3.6
4.8
0.46
3.82
2.3


2.4
4.4
1.82
5.0
6.2


0.2
5.4
1.0
2.0
3.1

* Value not used.
                           B-2

-------
              LONG-TEEM DATA FOR PLANT 7781
KEY:  AG577: Effluent Silver Concentration, mg/liter,
             1 February to 29 April 1977

      AG877: Effluent Silver Concentration, mg/liter,
             5 July  to 1 August 1977

      CD577: Effluent Cadmium Concentration, mg/liter,
             1 February to 29 April 1977

      CD877: Effluent Cadmium Concentration, mg/liter,
             5 July  to 1 August 1977
AG677
6,31
7*50
5.76
5,60
11,66
AG 877
8.72
5.23
CD 577
0,57
0.88
0,94
3.14
0.71
0.56
0,29
CD 877
0,18
0.2

5.10
8.10
8,46
8*00
10,34

4,93
3.75

0.8
0.72
0*98
4*0
0.63
1.12
0.35

0,19
0.15

5.27
4.44
7.46
2.85


7.18
3.12

0.9
2.0
1.24
3.69
0*97
1.0
0.31

0.24
~Q?12

9.75
3.28
3*03
6.10


4.69
1.52

0.7
0,95
1,52
1.82
0.51
0,5
0,19

0*18
0.04

4.64
2.33
4.34
9.27


3.62
1.53

0.08
1.18
2*23
2.6
0,82
0,33


0.1
0*04

8.64
-4.46
2.72
15.10


3*61
2.11

0*21
1.6
1.85
2.78
1*0
0.57


0.09
0,04

13.12
2.36
1.40
14.68


3.43
1.98

0.33
1.47
1.64
2.5
1.12
0.54


0.09
0.05

7.93
3.15
1.97
5.78


3.05
1.52

0,48
1.57
1.84
1.84
1.0
0.5


0.11
0.06

7.26
4.33
2.46
4.23


9.01
1.41

0.66
0.8
2.22
0.88
0.25
0.41


0.17
0,02

7.94
3.70
6.20
2,91


8.01
1.23

0*52
0.64
3.55
0*85
0.25
0.26


0.22
0.05
                          B-3
                                             -U S GOVEOHEHT PRIHTIIB OFFICE: 1981 3M-085/M5S

-------

-------

-------
 United States
 Environmental Protection
 Agency
	WH    552
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use
$300
Fourth-Class Mai!
Postage and Fees Paid
EPA
Permit No. G-35
 Washington DC 20460

-------