-------
§ §
CM H
Q S
in O H
^n tn
H
w
H
Q
01
i i r-1
It!
SfO
as
en
a
Q
ffl
in r- oo
O rH
O O O O
rH O
rH ^T
O O
M rH CM
o r~-
a\
CM
O
o
o
c
VI
n
rH
o^
o*^
CM
S
o
o
o
ro
in
o
o
o
o
CM
5
O
o
o o
rH f-H
O
O
O
O
CM
0) C
^ -3
CO
rH
0]
rH
1
CO
111-76
-------
SECTION IV
INDUSTRY CATEGORIZATION
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of industry categorization is to establish
subcategory groupings for pollution control purposes within
the photographic processing industry such that plants within
each group have an equal ability to meet the established
effluent limitations guidelines. Upon examination of the
various categorization bases it was determined that this
industry should be considered as a single group. The
following subsection describes the considerations for making
this determination.
CATEGORIZATION BASIS
After considering the nature of the various segments of the
photographic processing industry and the operations
performed therein, the following factors were considered as
bases for subcategorization:
1. Process type
2. Service performed or customer type
3. Type and quantity of material processed
4. Age of facility and number of employees
5. Geographic location
6. Water use
7. Effluent discharge destination
Process Type
Since the processes performed in a plant are the sources of
wastes from a plant, the photographic processes would seem
to be a natural candidate for subdividing the industry. As
described in Section III, there are a number of process
types used.
Many of the plants surveyed use multiple process types for
processing a mixture of photographic materials. The mixed
wastes from these plants tend to blend any distinguishing
process characteristics. There are, of course, plants where
IV-1
-------
wastes do not contain all of the pollutant parameters of
concern because only one process type is used or the process
blend is such that one or more of the waste parameters of
concern is omitted. For example, a black and white negative
only plant does not use bleach, and a color negative only
plant typically does not use ferricyanide or dichromate
bleach. (The color negative process, MC-42, uses
ferricyanide bleach, but observations during the study
showed a tendency for color negative and print plants to use
the C-41 process which uses a ferric EDTA bleach. The MC-42
process is more likely to be used in plants having a mix of
reversal processes and use a house ferricyanide bleach
system.) As a result, total cyanide and chromium pollutants
are not added to the wastewater and these plants will have
no difficulty in meeting any limitation on these pollutant
parameters. Therefore, the presence or absence of certain
process types is not a basis for subcategorization.
Service Performed or Customer Type
The service performed or customer type determines the types
of materials to be processed which, in turn, determines the
processes utilized. Therefore, the above discussion about
process type is also applicable to the service performed.
Type and Quantity of Material Processed
Some distinguishing process characteristics for the various
material types are shown in Table IV-1.
IV-2
-------
TABLE IV-1
Distinguishing Process Characteristics of Various
Material Types
Material Type
Black and White
Negative
Reversal
Color Film
Negative
Reversal
Negative, movie
Negative, movie print
Color Paper
Negative
/'Reversal
Processing Characteristics
No bleach
Dichromate bleach, waste bleach
contains silver
High silver, ferricyanide or EDTA
bleach
High silver, ferricyanide, EDTA, or
ferric chloride bleach
High silver, ferricyanide bleach
Low silver, dichromate or
ferricyanide bleach
Low silver,
Low silver,
EDTA bleach
EDTA bleach
As indicated, some of the materials have a relatively high
or low amount of silver in the emulsion that is potentially
released to the wastewater. Generally, most plants process
a mixture of materials which tend to produce an amount of
silver in the effluent per production unit that is in the
mid-range of silver that would come from film or paper
alone. For example, it is common for a plant to process
both film {high silver) and paper (low silver). Even a
movie film plant which processes all film is analogous to
the common film-paper plant in that the movie plant
processes both high silver content negatives and low silver
print film. A plant which processes only reversal films
will have a relatively high silver load prior to silver
Silver recovery processes are generally operated
silver concentrations to comparable levels
of the silver concentration before silver
So, assuming similar hydraulic loads, a reversal
recovery
to reduce
regardless
recovery
only plant would potentially have effluent silver levels
equivalent to those of other types of plants.
IV-3
-------
The bleach characteristics in Table IV-1 are related to
process type; therefore, the discussion on process types is
applicable.
Production normalized quantities of process water and silver
in the effluent versus the quantity of material processed
(production) are shown in Figures IV-1 and IV-2,
respectively, for the plants studied. The plants having
end-of-pipe treatments are identified in Figure IV-2.
The water use plot indicates no strong dependency of water
use with production, and the plot of silver load versus
production shows a general downward trend of lower silver
with increased production. However, when considering the
grouping of plants with similar silver treatment, the
grouped silver quantities are generally independent of
production. The downward trend is most likely a result of
increased silver treatment rather than a dependency on
production. Water use may be higher in plants with
production of less than 93 sq m/day (1,000 sq ft/day) due to
inefficiencies of operation and the use of less efficient
(in terms of water use) process equipment, but the available
information is insufficient to make this determination.
Therefore, based on available information, processed
material quantity is not a suitable parameter for
subcategorization.
Age of Facility
Production normalized quantities of process water versus
plant age and silver in the effluent versus plant age are
shown in Figures IV-3 and IV-4, respectively, for the plants
studied. No particular relationship between these
parameters is shown, and therefore plant age is not a
suitable basis for subcategorization.
Number of Employees
Production normalized quantities of process water versus
number of employees and silver in the effluent versus number
of employees are shown in Figures IV-5 and IV-6,
respectively, for the plants studied. No particular
relationship between these parameters is shown, and
therefore number of employees is not a suitable basis for
subcategor i zat ion.
IV-4
-------
0
© ©.
©
O
©
G
©
O©
®
0 <$> 0
G
©
0
e
o
©
©
IV-5
-------
UJ O 1 t
«= •* i *
* = z I
HI Ik £ P
> iu ^. o
si X o z
•» £ ac w
v> w K fa
< » 5 «
X £ u. E
^- K "? I-
-------
<
0
i-S
-S
o
0
0 0
00
0
0
0
0
0
(9 OP
< U.
(C
3
(9
3 8 S 8
w » 3 N
•"•* oooi/saazn oooi 'uaivw ssaooud
IV-7
-------
<
Or'
O
00
©
-s
<"»• 000t/fe| M.N31NO3 « 3AT IS
IV-8
-------
.-§
-I
o
-8
'UU.VMSS33OIU
IV-9
-------
-8 =
-------
Geographic Location
Geographic location is not a basis for subcategorization.
Photographic processes are not affected by the physical
location of the facility. The price or availability of
water may affect the amount of modification to procedures
used in each plant. However, procedural changes to conserve
water can affect the concentration of pollutants discharged
but not the amount or characteristics of the constituents.
The waste treatment procedures described in Section III can
be utilized in any geographical area. In the event of a
limitation in the availability of land space for
constructing a waste treatment facility, the in-process
controls and wash water conservation techniques described in
Section III can be adopted to minimize the land space
required for the end-of-process treatment facility. Often,
a compact package unit can easily handle end-of-process
waste, if good in-process techniques are utilized to
conserve raw materials and water.
Water Use
As previously shown in Figure IV-1, no strong dependency
exists between water use and plant size in terms of the
quantity of material processed. It is expected that the
relative amount of water used by very small plants, less
than 93 sq m/day (1,000 sq ft/day), will be larger than the
industry norm due to inefficiencies of operation. For
example, when production is low, process machines may be on
stand-by for long periods during which time there is some
wash water flow. Small processors commonly use manual tray
processing and low volume production sheet film and paper
processors which are inherently less efficient in water use
than large continuous process machines. The available data
are insufficient to quantify the water use for these very
small plants. For the size of plants represented in Figure
IV-1, there is no basis for subcategorization.
Effluent Discharge Destination
Of the approximately 11,000 photographic processing
dischargers, fewer than 20 are direct dischargers as
determined by an NPDES permit search. The fact that a plant
is a direct discharger has no effect on the type of
pollutants discharged. Direct dischargers may currently
IV-11
-------
have more stringent limitations because of permit
requirements. As a result, they may have applied more
effective controls and thus have smaller pollutant amounts
than those which discharge to POTWs. The available data are
insufficient to make this determination.
SELECTION OF PRODUCTION RELATED PARAMETER
In the selection of a suitable production normalizing
parameter, a number of production related factors were
considered. The level of production activity in a
particular plant can be expressed as the processed area, raw
materials consumed, number of process machines, or number of
employees.
All of these parameters have some relation to the level of
production in a particular plant, but area processed is more
closely associated with the level of activity relative to
pollutant discharge than the other parameters for the
photographic industry. Raw material consumed is directly
related to area processed but with the area being the
primary factor. The number of process machines is related
to the area processed but varies depending upon the degree
of utilization of each machine in a particular plant. The
number of employees is an unreliable measure of production
because of a varying degree of automation, particularly in
the smaller . facilities. Therefore, the area of emulsion
processed was selected as the production normalizing
parameter.
IV-12
-------
SECTION V
PROCESS WASTE CHARACTERIZATION
DATA BASE
The initial EPA study of the Photographic Processing
Industry was conducted during the period mid-1974 through
mid-1976 and included a Kodak "200 plant" survey and the
collection of data and sampling of three plants in the fall
of 1974. In the spring of 1976 the National Association of
Photographic Manufacturers (NAPM) conducted a sampling
effort of 37 plants. An expanded EPA effort was initiated
in the fall of 1976 for the-purpose of collecting additional
information. This second EPA study began in October 1976
with the sampling of two plants. Then information was
obtained from 139 plants in a telephone survey which was
described in Section III. A formal request for data was
made to those plants which indicated during the telephone
survey that they had available self-monitoring data on
wastewater characteristics. A total of 19 plants submitted
some information based on this request. From information
gathered in the telephone survey, twenty plants were
selected and visited. Detailed engineering information was
obtained on the process water use, in-process controls,
end-of-pipe treatments and wastewater characteristics. The
factors considered during the selection process were product
mix, in-process controls, end-of-pipe treatments, size
(production) and data availability. . Primary consideration
was given to the use of end-of-pipe treatments and
in-process controls. Five of the 20 plants visited were
selected for sampling by EPA. Selection factors considered
were product mix, in-process controls and end-of-pipe
treatments. The sampling of these plants took place in the
summer of 1977. A summary of these data sources is aiven
below:
V-l
-------
Information Source
and Type __
Number
of Plants
1969-1974 Kodak "200 Plant"
Survey
1974 - EPA Engineering Plant
Visit and Sampling
NAPM Sampling
EPA Sampling
EPA Telephone Survey
EPA Engineering Plant
1976 -
1976 -
1976 -
1976 -
Visit
1977 -
1976 -
EPA Sampling
Self-monitoring
data
submitted to EPA on request
237
3
37
2
139
20
5
17
Note that some plants in each source category may be
included in another category. For example, some of the 37
plants in the NAPM sampling effort were also covered in the
139 plant telephone survey.
Section V contains data for 76 plants obtained from the
described sources of information. Four digit number codes
are used to represent each of the studied plants. The
series of numbers 02nn have been assigned to the 37 plants
included in the 1976 NAPM sampling effort. The data have
been condensed (by averaging) and abridged. Table V-l lists
the plants studied by plant code and gives some general
characteristics of their customer type, SIC code, relative
size, and production. The production information is given
in terms of percent film production, percent black and white
production, and the percentage of color production
attributed to the several bleach types.
Sampling Efforts
EPA conducted waste stream sampling efforts in the fall of
1974 and 1976 and in the summer of 1977. A major portion of
the 1977 effort was devoted to the sampling and analyses for
priority pollutants. The collected effluent samples
consisted of flow proportioned composites taken during
single process days in the 1974 and 1976 sampling efforts.
Flow proportioned composites were taken for each of three
days at each site during the 1977 sampling effort with the
exception of plants 2714 and 9026. No effluent samples were
V-2
-------
i
i w
SO
in
1 B
g
0-
il|
^ o p
5>-rf £
<£ Q Cu
g -
H _o
COO
u u r»
fl) O fi
«
|S
"c o1 o
Q) -H 3
M V4 p
££0,
g
-1,1 jj
C O
83
%, 'B
i-i rt o
£-H 1-1
WH C [i
s
•H
e
•O O
0) Ai D
o tJ '6
& m c-
..
N
•H
U
H
U)
l^
03 &
O [?
3^ ^j
X
a. o
OOOOOO O8OOO OOOOO OOOOK
cfim^o oo o\ o o o
C* »OOO8 88OO8 8{Ti OB O 8 B B 6
pH i— 1 ^H ^H rH
"
•-• ini~ioo <-Hinooa 01-1000 oi-tOiH(N
M
in TT o
s
-H
s
D
1
OCOOOOB BBOOO KOOOK OKSSe "*
^-(
3
IM
O
jj
UCOU<<< U U £C < U < ffi < < CQ < U < U CO =
v v v v g
i-l
a
minr*i min mcriininin in i— i in in inminmin ..
f*} f~J fO t ro co f*} GO f*^ fl f^ ro C*J f^ C^> t f""i fo f*^ ro ro H
r~-r~-r~- r~-p~- r~r~-[*-r~-r~- r~-r~-r^f~~ r--ri-r^-t~-r~- ™
n
ft
5
S i
c ft b u & a
0) H 3 r-( U C S
5 X ainjojS4-ifl)
-H -, -P -H g P -H -H
ci F? ronE?^n>
4, i |«BSS£
g B ' iJ-i^J.
BE 3 Q Q td O
5, S Q C E £
V-3
-------
13
rH HI
J 3
-S
II
S5
(a -H
4-t £ 4-1
coo
o-nS
(SDH.
<
O O
fV] ,^J
C 0 tJ
O ^ 'S
Cj 1. Q
9 P Jr*
Pi fii f?[
•^ C
2 S
a --I
•U >l4J
C ETu
O (D M
ft En ft
g
•y **
c o
0 E "§
&"£ ft
3
-H
T3 S
I: 0
fl) -^ 3
(U rH S
ft a ft
a
N
•H
cn
M
Vi
ra a,
O ^
>-< o
eu o
ftp
^.
SOaOO OBO8B SO3OO OOOOQ Jj
5
_3 o
'D o
& —.0^
o o o *-.
o1 o o in 5
n o - i I
oo oo ooooooo^ -<-J'ino§
aoaao3oasS8 s i o o o
i— 1 i-t i-t OOO--
•H o o m o
•H f~- o -'-'in
O O -CM —
5 0 r-l — 0
ft V 03 •T T O
*— rH 1 I <»
r*i c'l GO 10 —
•* fft ci iH ^ i1
ro S
(NOBUO OSOCMiHinSBOO OOOOi-l ™
CM OOOOOO w
S < < o u o
W V
_,
o oo ooooooom B
B oS3 aaaoo aaooo oooor-i ffi
n
Si
S«
o
I! S q S*
is ii ^
BOOOO OHO8O 8BOOO O O O O O B-IM W§ 'jg
_• ^ -«J -rt -rl
d 33 'd « H
Si §Sfi^
S 6 u "o 5 ^
•^ o a o c
•gJ ttift«H
.i *" iiit
o < p a o rt o < ta o ^ ca u o o uuuuo c g 2 9 n ^
K jj & ft W >!
flj Q
in 9itnm ininffiot mo>inm m in m in in c
C\ r-f ^ O^ 0^ O\r^rH O^rHC^O^ 9kC^O9t 9V Q) id
MBoaf^**! Sforooooo Bnoocor) nnfOjon QQ
j^ f^c^c^. p^^^r^ r^r^r^r** r^r^p-r^r^ (Q
2*'Q ^H ^
«lt — S3 "n le"1-1 5
pi S 3) w Q 'd S
9i o iH CM n •* m \o r^ oo en o r-t ts <*) v m vo t* (N
-------
> 3
I §
EH —
C D U
R ^
«-3
Ebi
JP r.® J?
& fc< Cu
«
•as
Et!|
£
Oi
-H C,
CM 04
c o
111
oo o o o o o o o
o o o o o o
oofH^iB o o o 01
i CTl Ol
O O f> rH 8 Ot^OO
»-i r- o
OlflrHrH OCOOi-HO
O Oi Oi M O CM
corHtnro o ^ o CM
rHi-HrHf) OVDOr-1
cn in in GO r*
U O « O U U
tnminn inmmtnm
o o m tc
invo r-moo^'f*i inr-moco oiOkooio
^3 co^ocorHcri r^(*imf*ifN (NI/IVOVM
rH(N
-------
_
*o
rH fij
* J
M jj
1 S
E-. —
S§
4J E -d
0) ij 3
n u 0
£3£
H o
ll ij
cog
LJ u O
a
C o
Jj k. Jj
8*3
SB'S
S £ fi
6
4J "-0
c a
Sal
1! t! ol
(ii
?j
•rH
§
-G C
+j 3 *•£
£ t
gj x -
Sfc-S
ffi m &
.8
w
t-
w
M
C-
-p <]
si
Jj
S/1
fr
f-H f
OH L
OOOC^O bOOOO OOJ^DOo
^t CO GO
oocooo Hoiono ooovoin
OiOO CTir-lOO >HcO
or-rM-wr- a^fNr-o om-woin
m M ON ^HrH rH ^
m t
t
fo o •— 4 o ^D dtnfi^o* cooono (
r^Oi-no(N iHm^ oom^r i
rH M «-t rH
1
i
1
SI
i
y I
5
u I
y i
O fl O ^" f*) ti O tf) O O O f*J ^H if^ O
0 •"• °° *" "2,1<
SJ
O f
•p i
U-l "J
0 i
rnucjoa ouu ^
f*iiTin-j *
1?
13
5
%.
-p
I
CO O
T) *-~ O
e" o o o"
o o in T
tr o-ii
K -m o o
fM 1 O O
t O O O
8^, o o - -
o o o in o
•H o o - —' in
4J O -M — '
O -.-H — O
^ "v *" *r S £
l-i co ^r -=r o
& r-f I I •«•
I k£ *3" ^O
r*^ ro co ^o -
•• O"l C^l rH ^- ^
§ v
M < < CD U Q
W v
3
i
! >i
i O -i -3
1 w 4) Q ?Q
I 4J U-i O 3
I
1 till
I S B. W X
J
3
3
D
^
i to c ^
•H Q pi
H X 4J -H £ O -H -H
j u < < O O E £
? 5 i i i i i j
J*
CO n £ K *~* S
Z5 £ W Q Q tJ U
D S < 0 0 E E
V-6
-------
taken at 9026; only grab samples were taken from two silver
recovery units. The waste stream samples at plant 2714 were
collected in 38,000 liter (10,000 gal) tanks prior to
discharge. Grab samples were taken from these tanks when
they were essentially full.
Plants 4550, 6237 and 1465 were sampled by EPA in the fall
of 1974. Plant 4550 was re-sampled in 1977 and the more
current data are included in this report. Plant 6237
discharged treated wash water directly to surface waters and
concentrated chemicals to a POTW at the time of sampling.
Since that time, the plant has combined the waste streams
and is discharging to a POTW without end-of-pipe treatment.
The data are no longer representative of the plant's
operation. Plant 1465 also separates the wash water from
the concentrated chemical wastes. The wash water, mixed
with some non-contact cooling water, is discharged directly
to surface waters without treatment. The concentrated
chemicals waste stream is treated and discharged to a POTW.
The data for these two streams have been combined and appear
later in this section under Effluent Characteristics After
End-of-Pipe Treatments.
Plants 6443 and 2488 were sampled by EPA in September 1976.
Samples were split with each plant, and the reported
pollutant concentrations are averages of the results
obtained by the plant and EPA with a few exceptions. The
silver value obtained by plant 2488 is reported and the
cyanide value obtained by EPA at 6443 is reported. These
individual results are more consistent with historical data
from similar plants. Both plants use silver recovery and
bleach regeneration on all applicable solutions. Plant 2488
treats fix waste by precipitation with ferrous sulfate in a
batch operation for cyanide reduction before discharge. No
batches were treated and discharged during the sampling
period so that the sample taken includes no fix waste except
for that carried over into the wash water. Such fix waste
is included in the EPA sample from plant 4550. This plant
is similar in process and waste handling characteristics to
plant 2488. The data for plant 4550 effluent containing the
waste fix also appear later in this section.
The samples collected during the 1977 EPA sampling efforts
were split with NAPM. The pollutant parameter concentration
values reported in the following data tables are an average
V-7
-------
of the EPA and NAPM values with the exception of certain
parameters measured in the concentrated process solutions
(before in-process controls). Because of the concentrated
chemical content of these solutions, various chemical
interferences caused some inconsistencies in the results
between the two labs. The NAPM values for total cyanide and
silver were, in general, used for the concentrated
solutions. These selections were necessary because it was
found that the standard EPA procedures did not consistently
give reasonable results for those concentrated chemical
solutions. NAPM used modified or other standard test
procedures in these cases based on their experience with
photographic solutions and obtained results more consistent
with the known solution formulations. The following is a
brief description of the major modifications made by NAPM on
the test procedures.
Total cyanide - In the presence of reducing agents such
as sulfites and thiosulfates, an excess of chloramine T is
required. After distillation, a determination was made of
the amount of reducing agent present. The amount of
chloramine T added depended on this result. The EPA
procedure calls for a fixed amount.
Silver - On concentrated samples NAPM used long
digestion periods of 0.5 to 3 hours with one hour typical.
Nitric-sulfuric acid was added during digestion to prevent
dryness. EPA digested directly to dryness in considerably
less time, potentially resulting in incomplete digestion and
low values.
NAPM conducted their own sampling effort in the spring of
1976. The results include 31 plants sampled for two days in
1976 and 6 plants sampled at various times during the period
1973-1976. Each sample is a flow proportioned composite
taken from the plant discharge during the daily production
period. In some cases the tested samples contain sanitary
wastewater. None of these plants use end-of-pipe treatment
prior to discharge except1plants 32 through 37 which treat
waste fix for removal of ferri/ferrocyanide before
discharge; however, no treated waste fix was discharged
during sampling.
In this section, all production related parameters are
expressed in terms of surface area of photographic emulsion
V-8
-------
processed in units of thousand square meters with
corresponding English units of thousand square — feet — in
parentheses. — - - - - —
PROCESSES USED
The processes used by the plants studied are listed in Table
V 2. Details of the listed processes were discussed in
Section III. m general, the process chemistry and
procedure at each plant were the same as that previously
described. The variances observed were minor, usually
involving wash steps. The number and placement of some wash
steps are somewhat dependent upon the type of process
machine and squeegee usage. In black and white processing
it was common for the stop step to be eliminated. Sometimes
a hypo eliminator or hypo clearing agent step was added
atter fix. Because of the more complicated chemical
reactions and critical controls necessary for color
processing, there is very little latitude for process
variance. Although it is possible to substitute
terricyanide bleach for the prescribed EDTA bleach in the
C-41 process, no plants studied made this change. Plant
1232 uses EP-3 chemistry for color paper processing but has
eliminated the stabilization step. The process, then, is
essentially identical to EP-2 which has no stabilizer step
Plant 3075 uses a bleach-fix in the C-41 and C-22 processes
for which separate bleach and fix solutions are prescribed/
the bleaches being EDTA and ferricyanide, respectively.
This substitution is unusual but both processes had verv
limited usage. J
.of the Plant in-process controls used by plants
studied is given in Table V-3. The silver recovery usage
column refers to waste fix where "all" means that silver is
recovered from each fix solution from each process line. In
the primary silver recovery column, the notation "B In-line"
refers to a circulating fix solution system where an
in-line electrolytic silver recovery unit continuously
recovers silver from the fix. y
Plants 6208 and 7781 recover silver from the after-fix wash
waters and recycle a portion of the de-silvered water to
process use. Plant 6208 uses an ion exchange system to
recover silver from a mixture of waste fix and wash water.
A portion of the treated water is chlorinated and recycled
V-9
-------
**•
3 y
V-10
-------
a
a
P-
u
$
i
V A f> "g
HlS 3
S3S H
v-n
-------
V-12
-------
-a ,
§ >.
i)-S
•as
Tl 0
8-5
a.?.
n
n g
11
"3 w
9 a
,-s
15
rH
C.H
"6
O
ui ci
8^
in
a. y
as
2§
58.
V-13
-------
rr
F
|
g
&
e
1
;S
g)
!
^
ri
i
cs
~
en
ft
c-
Q
i
Q
§
N
1
£*
Method
i
Z C
CT..-J
., &
q y
K-H
Sci
e
X
•H
-6
r-t
e
3
fi
K
J,|
fa o
f
D
rH
•a
fv
E
n
u.
{
D
-P
1
X
g
t.
^
0
•-
^
C
,J
rt
o
SJ
I
X
71
&.
s
fa
^
— t
n
^
5
o
o
X
^
6.
^
fc.
71
fi
fi
^
i-
co
(LI
X
£»
6.
^
U
n
r-H
<
a
£
—
1C
0)
X
7*
fc.
§
fa
?
2
r
^
5
a
s
X
7f
U4
§
fa
•J
1
a.
c
^
>H
^
3
T
0)
X
?i
b.
g
0
t:
-a
1
Cu
ca
£
a.
gf
3
•ri
V
X
^
fa
§
0
n
a
«•
CU
ff
3
u
1
1
X
-
b
&
fa
a
P
*•
to
ff
3
-
o
X
^
g
CO
fl
a
r
I
X
-
E
Z
a
n
-H
a
DJ
^
3
*
1
X
-
&
6
g
n
2
03
CU
s-
3
*
C
X
^
fa
&
o
D
a
<
CO
,5-
3
r-
i
X
1?
§
§
g
Cl
c
s
ffl
1
IH
a
<
n
4-
n
C-
O3
|
01
X
yf
X
g
X
X
s
fl)
ft
z
**•
•5
ti
s
o
a
X
-
§
&
g
*
ca
**
3
•«
o
X
~
fa
§
g
111
a
«
?
•H
c
»
'J-
^f
a
i
X
%
fa
3
0
D
<
^
3
O
(-1
o
X
m
&
z
z
c
^
c
-
3
CO
=>O
i i
-H —I
a S-Q
Q Ql3
-oiS j
ss
J I
Di O X
a-H a
ffi jj m
>i C J-l
o H q nj
•H O H in
•"* H *^
0-5 s
I I I I
< ca u o
V-14
-------
gd
1-sj.j
•n i" *J
Is?
xig
O r-t
a JJ
c £
3 w 3 o
"KKS
£8.38
•d B -P -H
3 "ol
•O D 0 -W
Sag*
-S Jl
•H C .-)
•H -p C 3
So -H £5
O 01 'H
11(1
< CQ U Q
V-15
-------
VI
Hi
*u
OJ
CQ
0
1
4-1
d
OJ
f
&
8
i-4 -H
O -U
rH rH
cn u)
l|_| V
3 fi
n
I
u
a
3
3
0
3
i-(
a
•8
3
§•
H
U
,
S
1
4-)
%
fti
^ rH H
(0 (b tO ^
"i -H a TI
jj 4J "Z 4-1
(n«MM wuimiHtna] tn tn-oiujoiw wym
GiO)(D'oUl)(!)ajioS>i>''JliS><>H?-|C-i>t>'I3>i|Z>l2l>4>'I:H>H2>^Cj>'
to «3 CD
M -H M
•Z. 4-1 2
m ^•"If?^irtnn'rfrt:n?<:
iSii^iis^lSilSE^i^ii^ESiHZ
a a a c3 a a
<->*322;c-z>H
tg fo en ^
.^ -H M 'H
^ ti S" a w
iKtc.zS^^
C3
«-aoo<«»
^ ^-t ^ ^-i oi
Q tO Q t3 M
-H --t -H -H 2
4J Jj Jj JJ **
<;5tJC4=-.a-<2
rn
o
1
01 ci r-i 01 f*i CN rv) rvi
oooooooo
II
l\
O 0
a u
2-H
4J
U ^ Ql
•H O -P
r-4 G •-(
ffl tj ™
-M GJ *W
Q) r-IU-i
S UO
V-16
-------
to the process. The waste fix has gone through primary and
tailing silver recovery prior to mixing with the wash water.
The silver is recovered from the resin on site by
backwashing the resin with a proprietary concentrate. Plant
7781 treats the wash water with a reverse osmosis (RO)
system and removes the__s_i_lyer frpm_ the concentrate by
sulfide precipitation and settling. Before introduction to
the RO unit, the wash water is equalized and filtered.
Plant 9061 also uses a proprietary resin ion exchange system
to recover silver from wash water. The silver is recovered
from the resin off site by a contractor and the waste wash
water is discharged.
While ferricyanide and ferric EDTA bleach regeneration is
not as universally practiced as silver recovery at the
plants visited, most plants do some regeneration of bleach.
In most cases where a bleach was not regenerated, it was
from a little-used process.
Dichromate bleach is not regenerated. Some plants reuse a
portion of the bleach overflow by discharging a portion and
reconstituting the remainder. Plant 6208 uses a
"replenish-on-demand" dichromate bleach replenishment
technique which was described in Section III. In addition
the plant uses a resin ion exchange system to reduce the
chromium level in the after bleach wash water prior to
recycle of the water.
WATER USE
Water is used in the photographic processing industry for
the following purposes:
(1) Process water: film and paper wash water, solution
make-up water, and area and equipment
wash water.
(2) Non-process water: Non-contact cooling and heating
water, cooling tower (air
conditioning), boiler, and sanitary.
The total (process and non-process) water use for the
facilities visited in the industry ranges from 13,200 to
2,100,000 liters per day (3,500 to 550,000 gallons per day).
It was observed that more than 95 percent of the process
V-17
-------
water use in each facility is for film and paper washing.
Unless otherwise stated, water use throughout this document
refers to process water only.
Process Water
Film and Paper Wash Water
The largest single water process use is _or the washing of
film and paper during various stages of the process. The
function of the wash step is to remove no longer needed
chemicals included in the emulsion during manufacture,
absorbed into the emulsion during processing, or reaction
products created during processing.
Solution Make-up Water
The chemicals used to make up processing solutions are
generally supplied to the processor in the form of liquid
concentrates or powdered chemical formulations. The
processor adds water to make up the solutions to working
strength. Waterborne wastes are generated when these
solutions are discarded after becoming exhausted or when
allowed to overflow during replenishment, as is the common
practice.
Area and Equipment Wash Water
Water is used for the washing and rinsing of solution mixing
utensils, storage tanks, and processing machines and for
area washdown.
Non-Process Water
Some facilities use non-contact water for the heating and
cooling of process solutions to maintain proper operating
temperatures. This water is not process water since it is
contained in enclosed water jackets around process tanks and
does not come into contact with raw materials or the
product. Other non-process water uses include make-up water
for cooling towers, boilers, and lawn sprinkling. The
volume of water used for these purposes in this industry is
small when compared to process water use except in the case
of large plants with cooling towers for air conditioning.
V-18
-------
Water Usage
Some general information on water use is included in the
results of the industry survey and the EPA telephone survey
tabulated in Section III. This information is in terms of
ranges of total process water use. During the EPA plant
visits, estimates of detailed water use information were
obtained from the 20 plants visited, and these estimates are
presented in Table V-4 along with total process water use
for the remainder of the plants studied. The average total
process water use for the 70 plants from which data were
obtained is 157,000 liters/1,000 sq m (3,850 gal/1,000 sq
ft) of material processed.
PROCESS WASTE
Process waste information was obtained from EPA sampling in
1974, 1976 and 1977, the NAPM sampling effort, and plant
supplied self-monitoring data. A major portion of the 1977
EPA sampling effort was devoted to the sampling and analyses
for toxic pollutants at four of the five plants sampled.
Most of the data were obtained from wastewater samples taken
after the application of various controls. The 1977 EPA
sampling effort also included the sampling of some process
solutions before application of controls. These data were
obtained to assist in evaluating the effectiveness of
various controls. The production normalizing factor used to
calculate the cyanide and chromium amounts found in the
following tables relates to the area of emulsion processed
using ferricyanide bleach or chromium bleach, respectively.
In reference to the cyanide values obtained during the NAPM
survey, the actual parameter measured was
ferri/ferrocyanide. The listed total cyanide value was
calculated by NAPM by multiplying the measured value by the
stoichiometric ratio of 0.74.
Tables V-5 and V-6 contain pollutant concentration and
quantity information, respectively, on various process
solutions before any application of controls. These data
were obtained from grab samples collected by EPA during the
1977 sampling effort. The solutions selected for sampling
were those solutions that the particular plant reconstituted
or regenerated for reuse. With these data, estimates can be
made as to the impact on an effluent of not reusing these
solutions.
V-T9
-------
-?
tn
m
S
p
&.
1-t
•3
Q
tj'^
K
o w
o
o o
-o
0) .H"
V4\
* rj
*J (0
3~
E ^~
_4J
—
g
1
S
£
•S
ll
JH
£
(0
fo
S
4
?
^u
S
-H
•a
to
UP1*H
n
o W
o
o o
-o
r-t O
S*s
4-> ro
S-H1
E 4J
W
ET
o ffi
o
o o
-o
r-t O
ID r-T
-H —
£
o B
o
o o
§s
B ^
•H 0)
O O O O
S S S S
r-T t^" 04
^n in r*^
^^
m
m
o
o *
(S * *
(S*
o S
•"*• \£>
» r^
t— t n
^^ ^^
O O
o o *
o o *
in ro
o in
tn 1-1
S —
V CT*
^H en
^*** ***f
O 0
o o *
p^ O *
in ^i
o o o
f-1 (N •«•
O O O
0 O O
o o o
O •-> CM
id o o^
-^
a
* .H *
* f-l *
f
S
t^
^~
cs"
*NP'
o
* o *
* o *
r-i*
O
•H
in
M
*"* '
O
* O *
* o *
t-l
o
0 0
o o *
O OJ *
i^> en
CTI ^H
to
^
o
* en *
* (H *
S
$
o
* o *
* fl *
CO*
l-t
^f
tH
O
* r~ *
* tn *
o
m
o
o
o
CM
w
in
o
o
M
o
in
en
ro
o
o
o
1-1
S
m
•H
o
m
in
o
(S
o
o
o
o
rH
*
«
*
*
*
*
0 0
V O
en r-t
O 0
o o
0 O
M ft
*Jr *^
_
ro
en
o
o *
CO *
m
o
r-
co
CO
O
o *
o *
r-t
In
r-
rH
S *
iH *
r-
o
o
\0
o
o
o
CJ
Svl
*
*
*
*
*
*
0)
1
Water In
E?
S
cr
o ft
o
o o
liters/1
(gal/1,0
%X
fO "a
rH O
a O
o
CO
o
0?
^^
o
o
* * * * r-
^-
CO
,-t in co M r-i
(N *r «H "* f>
O O iH U> (N
O O O O rH
s
O
o
rH
V
^*
O
o
o
o
r-
VD
i-i
r-t
(S
^
fH
O
O
^
r~
*—*
o
o
en
CO
01
in m
J
-------
ffs-
o m
0 0
£ nj
•H I?
rH —
O
o
m
fi
o
o
o
fl
fH
O
1C
i'
o
o
o
rH
O
o
rH
in
o
o
o
r-
o
o
o
rH
O
O
o
o
r^
in
o
o
rH
O
o
o
I—
in
o
o
fl
o
o
o
r-
rH
O
O
r-
r-j
o
o
o
ON
o
iH
O
O
rH
O
o
ON
v
O
m
*t
CJ
o
o
o
o
o
rH
O
o
rH
o
O
3
(N
rH
O
O
m
rH
U1
o
o
(N
O
O
O
CM
o
o
ON
-»
o
o
o
o
o
(N
O
o
o
fl
o
o
o
0)
f>J
rH
O
ki
o
o
o
ON
O
ON
O
o
CO
o
o
-3-
o
o
o
o
CO
rH
o
o
rH
O
O
o
o
in
o
(N
)
O
O
o
fl
ON
fN
s
S1
o
o
o o
S (0
•H tn
sr
o —
o o
o o
— o
*
r->
O
O
in
f!
o
o * * *
rH
O
CO
rH
o
ON
in
o
o *
CO *
in
in
O
(N
(N
o
(N
O
o
£ *—*
4J
cr "*"*
w
Ojn
fj
•• o
r-l O
K -H"
B fH
4J (Q
•H G"1
•H —
4-1
nj *S
iH O
Cu O
^,
o
o
r~
«.
S
o
o
o
(N
ON
•H
(N
(N
O
O
O
•I
o
rH
o
O
0 *
r-
o
^
in vo
in vo
^r ^1
O
O
o
*
^
-4
O
O
O *
O
r-
in
ON O
CO rH
*r in
J-,
o
in
**D
^
d
O
O
0 *
oi"
^<
rH
in in
f) in
m m
.
o
(N
in
(N
o
o
* o *
ro
O
rH
P"- O fl
rH fN CM
^^
O
fl
^
rH
O
o
CO * *
<-T"
in
^r co (M
TT Li"> t~~
<& \C VD
,_,
o
o
fl
^
fl
o
o
o
in
rH
O
r-
^^
o
*r
o
o
in
r-
rH
00
r-
r-
. ,
o
o
(N
*
TT
O
o
o *
rH
r-
rH
in (N
O fN
CO CO
o
c
fN
in
rH
o
o
o
oT
rH
^n
10
O
ON
O
C
CO
•h
(N
.H
O
O
O
(N
(N
m
ON
fN
ON
*
ON
ON
V-21
-------
sr
o
o
o
M
*-
g&
Jl
ill
0- O
o
i:
ti
^'
&
oooooooo
ooooooooo
ooooooooo
oooooooo
oooooooo
OCDOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
— o
o o o oooooooo~oooooo"oS
ooooooooooooooooooo
ooooooooooooooooooo
oooooo^rooocnooooococovo
i-JCMM^-mvpi— co
OOOOOOOO
(N(NM(N(N(N
-------
sr
— o
H.3J
5T
o o
o
u O
fcj
•a
o
o o
fcH§
W r-l
0) O
S-~
8"
B"
O
o o
-o
r-l O
— o
LI CO (N
V-23
-------
V.
0.
1
i*H
^
in
to
V4
CH
§
2
Q
I
,_!
8
4J -O
_g §
C 51
J3 *i
T 5
II
%^
o ft
o
0 O
•-O
"jjS
q .H
+J CD
-rj 01
i— 1 •^•^
E_
S1^
o ft
o
O 0
-o
i— * O
11
E A>
O U)
0
0 0
N.^
in rH
flj rH
* 2.
0 O
O 0
f^ Cf ^, «
O O O O
O O O O
CO CO oT (N*
^ 1— 1
o ,-~ .-^
CN i—t ["*
o
in
CM
O
OJ
fl) O Q) m
in
co
O 0
^r o
O 0
PI co
1-1
M
*2
0) o
en"
CO
Q) O
JO
ff.
o
o
o
o
o *
—1
o
m
Cft
oT
o
o
o *
o
tN
O
5 *
™
o
l-i
CN
O
O
r-i
cn
CO
In
in
o
(S
o
CO
o
(M
O
o
f^
00
o
o
o
o
o
cd"
co
CM
*
*
*
*
O K
O
O O
o
o —
o
o o o
•31 rH W
-H r-l
DI RJ
in m in
V-24
-------
Table V-7 contains data obtained from grab samples taken
before and after various silver recovery operations. These
samples were taken during the 1977 EPA sampling effort.
Tables V-8 and V-9 contain pollutant concentration and
quantity information, respectively, on the effluent from
plants using in-process controls for silver recovery,
coupler recovery, and bleach regeneration where applicable.
A description of the in-process controls used at the plants
was previously given in Table V-3. The hydraulic load
values given in Table V-9 may not always agree with the
process water values for a specific plant given in Table
V-4. The process water information in Table V-4 represents
estimates or long-term averages in most cases while the
water data in Table V-9 generally represent a measured flow
over a relatively short sampling period.
EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS
The results in this section describe plant effluents after
the application of various end-of-pipe treatments. These
treatments are in addition to the various controls which
were previously described.
End-of-pipe treatment information for plants using such
treatments is given in Table V-10. Table V-11 contains
before- and after-treatment data for some individual
treatment operations. Tables V-12 and V-13 contain the
plant effluent data for plants using in-process controls
plus end-of-pipe treatments, pollutant concentrations, and
amounts, respectively.
V-25
-------
o o o
o o o
o o o
co fi in
fN in O
.-1 fN fN
CN CO ^
vfl CN CO
in -co
o o o o
in o O o
r- -a -v f
ooo'
fN CN i-t i
p-H O CO CO
-H CN - -
o o o
en o o o
CO O O O
o - - -
-T CO O
o o o
o o o o
-en ft O
O fN - -
•-> -m co
V CO r-4 CM
1/1 CN
IN CO
r*l O in
O O O
ooo ooooo
O O O OOCOOCN
TTCOCN ^^C> ...
..» --1OCN\O
OCOCO COfNOCnO
rroiin c~-infMCNm
CO O 1C CN .-H
in CN CN
CN TT O
ooo
in o r-t r-
• - • fN •
t~~ o a fN o
fN O \O
T CN O
--I fN \O f) CTl
CN CN CN
OOO
o o p
OOO
ooo
o 10 in
•-i 1-1 in
o
o o p -H
o o o o
in m o in
r- r- en -H
o CN n r-
•«• f-J CO
c*1 O \D
o p o
c o
in o
. -en
CO
o
o
o
LA
»— O CM
•"-( O CO O
o o o o
O C O in
C"1 O CT1 tJ1 D1
33335
5
i- 5)
|_2_ i_~-:::- S"'iia g* 5* ^ — —
3|ryx '"^xx s| -^ ^ IJ'y'yxx
^v..-,^ -r - J y _|"C^ ^ 2 ^ ^ 3
s^-^ 335^-
V-26
-------
U-l
s
o
o
o
r-l
5
Q
W
o
o
o
i-H
CJ
^
,
£ ,
il
4J
4J
3
1
&
Vl
1
s
-d
|
_
g
.H
>S
«S
O
*
•H
§
o1
1 O <•> 1 * 1 •" 1 ui
C —1 1 O 1 O 1 O 1
i-4 O.H O rH O r-l O
x *• __^ *"* x — — • ^ x "^ x ^
inocvX coir, Sxxx
inromo'-t'H f-ioo^-f^p-ii-i en in
*— * "- * o "^ o "**'' ^c> "^^ o '*-' r~* '^•^ o — ' lrf>J
101010 i o t o i o i o 1010
O-HOrHOrH OfHOfHOr-lOiH O-HOfH
x^^^xX xxxxxxx* xxxx
fsj-iH-r^- in«o-m«c>' o»r^-cN
.— . — -~ — . — — .
*n 1
Or-lOi-IO--* 1 Ol OOfHI O O-HOfHI
r-t f-t «-H OfHOrHrH O»H f-H ^-1 O
VVV_^_u Sr*^ VV^^J
XXX XXXX XX
rH^
I 1 I 1 I
I
Se
Jiffi
4J fl)
01 Q
V-27
-------
11
y,
O CN --I O
o o o
in ON (N CO
CM <~1 .H -a
\ft tpi *r
...
in fi I-H
CNi-IlD
eo o ft o n o eooo^Of-loo . (j, ^
in *O *o^ *co »r*i
. m • n> * * • -H •
^H — rTl CN — \O (NJ
, T-
1 o i o
09 • (N • vfl -ID • •* X
• a\ -IN • o • o •»
^ co o i
-(N— Tt •—
1 1 1
1 1 1
! B
fvj . vo . o
o >o -o
o -in - \o
g u !
? -ii '
Vj 3i i
4J i I
V-28
-------
01
r- tn
> O
Ig
c
c
~
cn
1
S
s1 tt
b K
'i
*
3
£ r
JB
c
^
ft
Q]
3
s
*r
*
O 1
IN 1
X 1
"-
— t 1
O
CO I
O
o
o
33 1
CM 1
O
O
in c-
—i «•
r- I
c
r-H 1
O
in
r- i
—i
—i i
r-
i- i
Or" -•! O
-r-- » »
„
<.-•-. ;r> ~
o o o o
o c\
• • ^ \s
O O f> CN
^ o r- •
o o ort
ii i i
it ii
TT
C rH
f-1 O \Q
kO ^-1 CN
01 O O O
«*o o o
V
o o
r- -a-
-• r- in
r^* n ft v
fN fl
PI O
1 1 O O
CO
in o
&\ G\
kD O
• rH
0 0
0 p
0 O
CM (N
O O
o o
i i
i i
o o
o o
«t-*
o o
c c
CM rH
O O
O O
i-H •
CM "T
rH r-i
O O
O 0
"1
Ub
V-29
-------
3
•H
1
Sh»
€
w O
S flj
S -.-J
Q c
8 g
1 ^
5 •-(
D 0
O Q.
fe
s
M
co E-
> §
S3 Eu
1 s
3
3
M
E"
Ul
M
g
i
D
a
1
r
rl
VJ
D
71
E-
"S
ID
3
|
c
U ifl
M H
-* i
z <
Q
a
s
5
.-
i
b
g
•j
TC
y
£
-|
5
a
if
-t
g
-H
-U
U-l
l-t
i-l
0]
g
J.
'i
i
jj
(H n
rH C
0. C.
-a TT o o r— o
Q co o in co iH
o I-H CN II "-1 1 cocnl •-! CJNVO
~ co IB ii -t ,,i T ^ _7
rH \3 S rH r-l i-l rH in r-l
1 •* 1 T 1 0 rH -T j CO
1 p-H 1 rH CO 1 ^" O i— 1 VO *
I d! di ii ddi o 10
O CO
CT, rH CN m r-
i i! irj ii ^-d-T --t ifn
in
in o . .
i ii 1-11 ii* i
i ii I in i ) lit- i I'
r- t— ^ouioo mo
O OCTi 1O CN*T O^lTl CN \O^>
^ o\^r 1 (*> fncN ficsco CN r~rH
a ^to ianc~- locfto
Q. CNin r-c-4 no •* m (*t CN min
ir- t~-l r-l r-[~-r~- r~ r» r»
cri ini lifl ffitN ill * 22
in
rjj in CU
j flj j- QJ rfi j 4J
w S 0] « « J3 ?M'm
-H J Q rH -H -H -H -H O 'H ""n E1
•CCNP-I rH C CN£j3J5j:in>^^rN^CNCN
rH -H ta ci o cu E^FCJ pc-u cqcq4J4J P-y Pe1
J5 ffi >U-HQ > > fa >-Hb'H-r)-rt alooaij 33
pSoS>•'v^lnf*^CN
O O rH \^ CN f^ ^" ^* \DrHr'S^^*^lr*fcCOO^'^1VOCN
OOO O'-H-Hi-HrHi-ICNCNCNrNCNfNCNMfO'^^l^1
g
.rH
*H
S 3
I 's
p* X
a. UH
5 3
i i
g --a
« "Si 3
cq g 3
S .,
3 q •
rH a q
, H~i
ui 3 0
*H S ^ O
IH n C
-U W.C O
O rC O
iunSS
IM fli ^
0 u 3 0
0 &j:
5 J B §
q Mr-i'a
J-J -H J3 (0
c-3 4J
-H q -^
i* 'D O,
W C^-H
8up.fi
5 6 c
3j ca sj >
W Q
-------
>•%
eo K
i S
> C
1!
J3
--I f3
g£
S
*g
£
0
^
_H
S
'Tj
a
i
U^J
Sanplo In
LoiT
4J
-2-
[tescr
E Q)
%•&
C
•-t
£
n:
"3
>
1C
4J
IN
fj
^-
°
1
-^
t^
UJ
C'
_*j
U!
5
&
fc
1
f-J
t*-l
o
i
c
in
in
r--
d
tr.
[^
f
c.
£
-H
M
U
fc
£
~
*3"
(N
a>
•H
H1
•H
«
O
in
1.1
.-•
CC
U-i
&
r*~
**
j
V.
c
w
p
fe
1
*r
!N
*T
t.
I
1
&
1
-H
g
TO
1
CO
o
fi
d
u-<
"S
1^
1
r-j
i
u
C
CJ
1— 1
E?
.-1
w
o
CN
I-l
in
o
U-l
S
l£
r-
i
CO
£
-H
tt
•rt ^
> Si
^ *r*i
2 w
CJs tN
in LI
i-^ ir.
T--
M:
o
14-1
f*
p
i
^
M
S
•-I
I
1
IN
!«-•
O
<
1— 1
vfi
in
0
u-
a
r~
c-
•-<
in
c
jj
in
E
t
lo
cc
*3-
LH
^_^
rc
1^
""
f
.—
K
P
f^
Sinqle 24-hr. !
Mot avail able
\c -
o-
c^
1— 1
"
^
r^
l
^
£
_P
T
cc
Not availal>lc
Avtj. of 1 to 3
Compos i tes
r- CM
"2
S
s-i
4J
S
o
p
1-1
o
5
•C
Q
c
•H
V.
L.
4_j
ra
§
H;
ra
05
(.1
^
&.
- flow proporti
ant has divided
E
d,
u1.
in
0
t.
CL
c.
c--
VJ
^
ID
•D
4J
10
"£
_^
4-
C
•u
u-
O
5
H
^J
1-
£
•— i
§
in
4->
§
&
C-
£
-
o
H
•t?
^
B
1
Q
C
•H
*
§
•F*
1«
O
<4~
•B
1
4->
«
8
•c
£
O
M
S
1
S
5
u
p
C1
fe
w
c
0
J-l
J
H
C
c
Q.
J?
>:
u-
tt
in
i
«
4-1
§
4J
"u
1
4J
J
E
V-31
-------
r-
• m
rv in
in ro o i-t
CM c^ *!• CN m
O CN O «H CN
"•I CM (N IT)
•H CM CM ri
O O O O
V-32
-------
SH 4J
J C
ffl O< O
< fe 0
^ <*—
iH
rti
3
-H
i-H
^
£
H
EH
1
1
|
1
5
•-I
ffl
s
£
f*l
^
e
8
D
s
4J
go
fH 5
cv. D
(£> \o kO I-H iniHrsicorj^r
o i-t ^* (M •vr'ivovc^'in
cvi in «* ^- f^i \c
r-ocooinr-orjmr-tNiHcii^L'i
r-rHiHtMCM--^>-lr-C^J-OOOCiO
CO^vDtN^-O'VVC^DCDVpM O^O
coci[~-m^io^'<~^r--c>l^'-i'(''f^o
ri:kDinm^jirorH^csJr--vDf^ctNr)
r-T r-T
r- ^ n m
["-(N^r^o * *ro itNCDvo^' «co
r--(Ninoin^D
infMCNi-iiNr-infninncNrHCNr-^
i*i^*iD*er^ooci OfHtNci^uDvor*
(NCN
-------
— — — CO
ST
-_ —• o
a §
g J
&s
S-rr
o ~
—. ,-, o
3 -n
-H
4J
01 0)
A iH
CD lu
S «
w o "O H
m 3 oj -O
-5
IN Oi IN CN It
V-34
-------
s
sr
o
o
o
rH
Jls
•H
—
s
&
o
o
o
rH
\.
cr
•^
*.
§
£
J
rH
rH
o
a
1
•r-
p
•d
8
ST.
r*
I
%
H
§
O
- ^S
Jo
0 O
U -0
•H rH O
-H \ -
3 U) rH
i" ^ "X>
l-l 0) rH
•a j-> i-H !7
•s
rH
co a
f1!
^
o- o
_
in
rH
O
o
r-
o
o
i
i
s
\
O
rH
.,
01
CM
O
o
d
in
o
o
(M
^
d
in
(M
—
O
O
o
rH
D 00
1
O
rH
X
CN
VD r-f
O
tN
— - o
fl """'
rH (T,
o in
0 0
o o
! i
~
1
« o
~ rH
J 1 V
1 0
O rH ^
rH —
. X
X CN
[- O
CO • O
• in •
(N — O
V
5?
**?
O
1
o o
0 0
o d
*~" ' — '
CM *r
0 0
o d
— S
o va
rH 0
d d
.Ol CM
"^ ^
0 0
c^
"l
^
o X
(N
t O O
1 0 •
o •—•
b
CO
CN
O
•~~ O
CN O
d
rH
CN O
rH O
0 O
0 0
T in
m CN"
0 0
o o
o o
CO* CN*
1*1 O
rH rH
rH d;
CO CO
o o
CN D \O
available
I
r-
fN
10
^"^ ^-*
« in ^,
1*1 CN ro
O O O
O O O
l-» r*l [-•
rH ^H rH
O O O
-^
rH
O
O
•
o
in i i
S ' '
o
d
o *""
f-^
X H
j „
CM CO
rH 01
o m
0 I 0
d
V o
V
CO
O ^-,
O VO
• rH
o .
01
0 1 (£
d ' d
000
\Q \G O
CN CN J*>
« a
fl f*J to ^J1
^r co CN <»
"^ vo VD r^
rH
o
o
^
in
o
d
rn
rrt
O
o
ID
rH
d
1
1
m
^H
o
CO
ID
d
o
CM
•»
^^
§ |
1-1 o
irt
*f Qj (U OJ C
(I) rH 'OJ ,H rH 1j
^jQ {Q fj ij '3
^ > > > o
ft
g) jJ jj jj
fl b O Q Q
W 3 323
'H CO ID rH r^ CM
CO in (M ID (Ti «•
r^ o CM o CM 01
r* co co ch cr\ en
s A
&
§ C
C "
4J Jj
W 0
S «
S "x
•H -H
ti
Q (D
P S)
/^ S
Uj S
G • 'O
•H -O QJ
m fl
*° *H S
E 5 fT^
CO H
0] S 01
M S tQ
3 ^j c i^ flj
r-i 3 3 O JJ
Oj 3 W O ffi
"H JV
tn Q •§ .3 g
rH fl S y (fl
13 M ^ 3 QJ
•3 01 W 8
O 0 W M
1) M QJ
SB s o
& i 5
S O A in
rH *H JJ
Ss^I
WOT! &
01 3 Q) 4J
g C rH J3
ajJ W
O 44 U4
n jj a) jj gi
J OJ 5 JJ JJ
o QJ Jo 3 i3
^ S -rf 7* *
i CG Q & 0j
V-35
-------
-
g
f*1 — ^- sj
r* W fl 1-1
O (N \D (N
-_ — O
o c —
f^l f-> -~
1 1
I &
in IT1 O
I/I CO CC
VO M
r»* if* o 03
**i L.I r-^ *Ni
^ ^- vO (N
V-36
-------
n in •=•
Ul 60 CD
o w ^
_. CD
pH O
co co
r^ O
*— m •—•
S ~ ~ " S w
T —i o
o> o o
I ss
o\ d
up in >H
* o o
dido
i i
eh r- rn —
^ -S
•S >
t-j Q)
5 I
or. o O ic en o
in in r- o
<^ in »H ts
in m us 10
eo in
-------
I 8
o o
o -o
—4 i-< O
iri Q r-t
•O -M (0
>i-H en
(N fl CO fM CO
^-,^~ — — CM
m^invD-^t-t
rsjro^cn--fO
OOOOCM .
r- — . — • o>
^ .O-HO -
. O • • • O
O •— ' O O O — ^
o • -o
. O O •
o
•
O
— co • —
(Nr--(Nr--fnmcoi-^^'aof^n^HPOcO'— O — ro in ^- »inr^in'^cof*ifNO^'f*i^ii/i ^ co^-
^^r^^oochfNioO'-
-------
.5
38
0 0
•k
ri •*•
I i
fii
j-i
S
X X X X ffi X X
X X
X X
V-39
-------
<_,
3
f— 4
S
S
2
w
G
GJ
2
3
1
ij
a
r-l
i-H
S
£"
p
,f
£
3
a
c
g
M
U
C
i
S
S
a
r-
3
j
g
n
£,
g
°
-H
•9
<3
O
w
*5
'
5
o
a
*;
S
-1
J Q]
o o
o o
* *•
r^ m
fN (N
I i
CO r-t
tN r-4
EN r-t
! !
CO (N
CM m
en CM
T O
in r-
in **!
O O
in in
fi f*>
rH O
in in
o o
o o
V V
0 O
o en
t-- Ci
* *
m CN
rN CM
O O
d d
V V
I
O
O «-"
CO W O
?ss
'slti'g
T fl 3 g
•O m >a S
W JJ B Tt
i-H
g
a)
^
i m
S u
O -d
"* §
4J S 4J
. g«i
ipled Streal
scri ption
Is
fjJ
x
O
luent to Ozi
cncentrated
nation Eff 1'
UJ O Q
c — s
M O
in
\o
T
i-t
in
co IN m o
-CO i-H CO
m CD
0 T -4
tN r-i r-i en
in in in
en o o o
o . . •
. o oo
en eo
fH r-t in O
r-l (N tN
o r- o o
d .do
v o v v
in en
! 9 ! r-T
p us i r-
CN
T en o
\o o o v
CM tN
eo o l
If) O rH
T
CM 10 O
(-• rH .
. o
O O V
U3 T
. . •
T O O
o o in
r-< in r-
r- T rH
i* » «
m ft CN
1 1 1
1 1 1
r
ii
%4
s^ ° a
•H 4J C -H
Qj C O Q«
a?!!!1?
slllSfi
i
>
3 o
Ul r^f Q *H
I"S i
: ^ S -S
gsilsis
m
tA
tn
•43
tN
rH
O
d
VD
tN
^
<*
O
in
(M
m
m
»-t
r-t
f*}
o
d
V
rt
,
O
O
O
VI
CN
1
1
£
1
!
g
jj
i *
f *>
1
II
V-40
-------
U)
t-t 'H
& *"
£ in
g >i
D c
£
6. I
a j-1
£ P
i ii
H G
£0
C
i 8
H a?
P .3
1 S
*"
H
1
b.
g
LJ
^
g
i
u
?*•
<
°;
k
8
r-
2
|
2
^
D
s-
E
5
I
CQ
B
-o
QJ
-
D
£4
M
1
§*
pl'H
o c
C H
jJ £
•H E
z
O T
O rH
rH
r-
""
i-l
1
1
in
in
in
rH
r-
in
en
rH
O
in
o
d
in
o
d
V
CO
d
ir
in
o
o
1
tr
1
rH
1-1
S
•H
S
fV
C
H
°
^"
(N
0)
r^i
to
in
W)
w
rH
\n
M
I
|
'
1
1
|
1
Ci
en
•3-
O
o
I
1
1
1
<*J
o
<*-<
rH
S
r-
Cl
rH
(ft
D
rH
Q
U-l
0
i
^~
rH
r-
fN
in
•H
m
in
S
S
cs
en
O^
m
o
in
fi
rH
rH
r-
IN
O
d
r-
o
d
04
r-
to
rH
rH
1
r-
co
-,
0)
ro
^j
Vi
3
o
o
o
CO
UH
rH
Tl
«
in
-
rH
•*
d
vo
!N
P-
in
in
in
rH
P-
rH
IN
O
o
o
o
r^
in
rH
•I-
O
d
1
7
r-
f
a
'w
o
I
fr.
_y
(N
U-l
0
?
•c
rH
cc
p»
r-
3
—i
Uj
1
S
-U
tn
0
a
c
Q
-^n
JJ
K
a
a
a
-H
1
c
!R
K
JJ
c
£
3
^
£
u
• a
tn 4J
5§
tJ S
3 C
-. C.
6 «-
t< c
0 ^
c ^
3 (C
^•6
C ffi
JJ -*H
"^ 4J
2 §
£ *t
n:
|«
^
v^
if
c; c
n c
a.t
2
PH-* X
3 .2r
-"" £
" «
en 4.
K
JH r
C- £
_ r.
V-41
-------
—. OJ
M .
ri S
am • to
S .0 m S
8.8.
V-42
-------
H 1
V-43
-------
-------
SECTION VI
SELECTION OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS
The Agency is concerned over potential discharges of toxic
pollutants from industrial sources. A comprehensive effort
was conducted to determine if these pollutants are present
in wastewaters from photographic processing. The toxic
pollutants are listed in Table VI-1. The conventional
parameters listed in Table VI-2 and non-conventional
parameters listed in Table VI-3 were also selected to be
sought in the field data collection program. In addition,
related published data and NPDES permit applications for
direct discharges in this industry were examined to assist
in this determination.
The wastewater characterization detailed in the previous
section has been reviewed to determine what wastewater
constituents are contributed to photoprocessing wastewater
in significant quantities. A toxic pollutant was considered
significant unless one or more of the following was true:
(a) the pollutant was not detected,
(b) its presence was due to incoming water, or
(c) it was present in concentrations below current
water quality criteria.
VI-1
-------
TABLE VI-1
Toxic Pollutants
acenapthene
acrolein
acrylonitrile
benzene
benzidine
carbon tetrachloride (tetrachloro-
methane)
chlorobenzene
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
hexachlorobenzene
1,2-dichloroethane
1,1,1-trichloroethane
hexachloroethane
1,1-dichloroethane
1,1,2-trichloroethane
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
chloroethane
bis(chloromethylJether
bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
2-chloroethyl vinyl ether (mixed)
2-chloronapthalene
2,4,6-trichlorophenol
parachlorometa cresol
chloroform (trichloromethane)
2-chlorophenol
1,2-dichlorobenzene
1,3-dichlorobenzene
1,4-dichlorobenzene
3,3l-dichlorobenzidine
1,1-dichloroethylene
2,4-dichlorophenol
1,2-dichloropropane
1,2-dichloropropylene (1,3-dichloro-
propene)
2,4-dimethylphenol
2,4-dinitrotoluene
2,6-dinitrotoluene
1,2-diphenylhydrazine
ethylbenzene
fluoranthene
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether
bis(2-chloroethoxy) methane
methylene chloride (dichloro-
methane)
methyl chloride (chlbromethane)
methyl bromide (bromomethane)
bromoform (tribromomethane)
dichlorobromomethane
trichlorofluoromethane
dichlorodifluoromethane
chlorodibromomethane
hexachlorobutadiene
hexachlorocyclopentadiene
isophorone
napthalene
nitrobenzene
2-nitrophenol
4-nitrophenol
2,4-dinitrophenol
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
N-nitrosodimethylamine
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
pentachlorophenol
phenol
bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
butyl benzyl phthalate
di-n-butyl phthalate
di-n-octyl phthalate
diethyl phthalate
dimethyl phthalate
benzo(a)anthracene (1,2-ben-
zantnracene)
benzo(a)pyrene(3,4-benzo-
pyrene)
3,4-benzofluoranthene
benzo(k)f1uoranthene
(11,12-benzofluoranthene)
chrysene
acenaphthylene
VI-2
-------
TABLE VI-1 (continued)
anthracene
benzo(ghi}perylene(l,12-ben-
zoperylene)
fluorene
phenanthrene
dibenzo{a,h)anthracene (1,2,5,6-
dibenzanthracene)
indeno(l,2,3-cd) pyrene
(2,3-o-phenylenepyrene)
pyrene
tetrachloroethylene
toluene
trichloroethylene
vinyl chloride (chloroethylene)
aldrin
dieldrin
chlordane
4,41-DDT
4,41-DDE(p,p1-DDX)
4,4[-ODD(p,pl-TDE)
a-endosulfan-Alpha
b-endosulfan-Beta
endosulfan sulfate
endrin
endrin aldehyde
heptachlor
heptachlor epoxide
a-BHC-Alpha
b-BHC-Beta
r-BHC-(lindane)Gamma
g-BHC-Delta
PCB-1242 (Arochlor 1242)
(Arochlor 1254)
(Arochlor 1221)
(Arochlor 1232)
(Arochlor 1248)
(Arochlor 1260)
(Arochlor 1016)
PCB-1254
PCB-1221
PCB-1232
PCB 1248
PCB-1260
PCB-1016
toxaphene
antimony (total)
arsenic (total)
asbestos (fibrous)
beryllium (total)
cadmium (total)
chromium (total)
copper (total)
cyanide (total)
lead (total)
mercury (total)
nickel (total)
selenium (total)
silver (total)
thallium (total)
zinc (total)
TABLE VI-2
Conventional Pollutants
pH
BOD
COD
Oil and Grease
Suspended Solids
VI-3
-------
TABLE VI-3
Non-Conventional Pollutants
Acidity
Alkalinity
Carbon, organic (TOO
Chlorinated Hydrocarbons
Color (units)
Cyanide (am. chlorin.)
DO
Fe(CN)6
Fluoride
Hal ides
Hydroquinone
Nitrogen-
Ammonia
Phenols
Silica
Solids -
Total
Dissolved
Volatile
Specific conductance
Sulfate
Sulfite/Thiosulfate
Surfactants
Thiocyanate
Turbidity (units)
Aluminum
Barium
Boron
Calcium
Chromium**
Cobalt
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Molybdenum
Potassium
Sod i urn
Tin
Titanium
Wastewaters from plants 6208, 2714, 4550 and 7781 were
examined for toxic pollutants. No organic toxic pollutants
were found except 1,2-diphenylhydrazine, which was found
(200 ug/1) in one stream at plant 2714. This chemical was
found in the reverse osmosis permeate but was absent in the
reverse osmosis concentrate, raising the possibility that
its presence in the permeate was an anomaly. This pollutant
was not found at any other plant. The organic priority
pollutants were measured to a detectability limit of 20 ug/1
by gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer analysis.
Pesticides were found at low levels at four of the five
plants. Amounts varied from the detection limit up to 1.6
ug/1. Similar amounts of pesticides were also found in the
incoming water supply in these plants. The quantitation
limit for pesticides is 0.1 ug/1 with the instrumentation
used. The single effluent streams from plants 6208, 4550
and 7781 and all three outfalls for plant 2714 were analyzed
for asbestos, but none was found.
VI-4
-------
The following toxic metals were not found above their
detectable limits in plant effluents:
Metal Detectable Limit, mq/1
Arsenic 0.002
Beryllium 0.005
Copper 0.010
Mercury 0.0002
Nickel 0.020
Selenium 0.002
Thallium 0.100
Antimony and zinc were found in concentrations equivalent to
concentrations in incoming water supply or equal to, or less
than, current water quality criteria.
A discussion of those conventional and toxic pollutant
parameters which were found in significant quantity follows.
Table VI-4 lists these parameters.
TABLE VI-4
Pollutants Found in Significant Quantities in
Effluents from Photographic Processing Plants
Toxic Conventional Non-Conventional
Cadmium pH Boron
Chromium BOD Dissolved Solids
Cyanide, total COD Hal ides
Lead Iron
Si 1ver Nitrogen, ammonia
Phenols
Sulfate
TOC
DESCRIPTION OF POLLUTANT PARAMETERS OF SIGNIFICANCE
LL. POLLUTANT PROPERTIES
Acidity and Alkalinity -
Although not a specific pollutant, pH is related to the
acidity or alkalinity of a wastewater stream. It is not a
linear or direct measure of either;, however, it may
VI-5
-------
properly be used as a surrogate to control both excess
acidity and excess alkalinity in water. The term pH is used
to describe the hydrogen ion - hydroxyl ion balance in
water. Technically, pH is the hydrogen ion concentration or
activity present in a given solution. pH numbers are the
negative logarithm of the hydrogen ion concentration. A pH
of 7 generally indicates neutrality or a balance between
free hydrogen and free hydroxyl ions. Solutions with a pH
above 7 indicate that the solution is alkaline, while a pH
below 7 indicates that the solution is acid.
Knowledge of the pH of water or wastewatet is useful in
determining necessary measures for corrosion control,
pollution control, and disinfection. Waters with a pH below
6.0 are corrosive to water works structures, distribution
lines, and household plumbing fixtures, and such corrosion
can add constituents to drinking water such as iron, copper,
zinc, cadmium, and lead. Low pH waters not only tend to
dissolve metals from structures and fixtures but also tend
to redissolve or leach metals from sludges and bottom
sediments. The hydrogen ion concentration can affect the
"taste" of the water and at a low pH, water tastes "sour."
Extremes of pH or rapid pH changes can exert stress
conditions or kill aquatic life outright. Even moderate
changes from "acceptable" criteria limits of pH are
deleterious to some species. The relative toxicity* to
aquatic life of many materials is increased by changes in
the water pH. For example, metalocyanide complexes can
increase a thousandfold in toxicity with a drop of 1.5 pH
units. Similarly, the toxicity of ammonia is a function of
pH. The bactericidal effect of chlorine in most cases is
less as the pH increases, and it is economically
advantageous to keep the pH close to 7.
Photographic processing wastewaters from the individual
processing steps are both basic and acidic. For example,
developers are basic and the stop and fix solutions are
acidic. When waste streams from these solutions are
combined in the plant discharge, the different streams tend
to neutralize each other. Overall plant discharges in this
industry are generally in the pH range of 6 to 9 with most
in the range of 7 to 8.5.
The term toxic or toxicity is used herein in the normal
scientific sense of the word and not as a specialized
term referring to Section 307(a) of the Act.
VI-6
-------
Acidity is defined as the quantitative ability of a water to
neutralize hydroxyl ions. It is usually expressed as the
calcium carbonate equivalent of the hydroxyl ions
neutralized. Acidity should not be confused with pH value.
Acidity is the quantity of hydrogen ions which may be
released to react with or neutralize hydroxyl ions while pH
is a measure of the free hydrogen ions in a solution at the
instant the pH measurement is made. A property of many
chemicals, called buffering, may hold hydrogen ions in a
solution from being in the free state and being measured as
pH. The bond of most buffers is rather weak, and hydrogen
ions tend to be released from the buffer as needed to
maintain a fixed pH value.
Highly acid waters are corrosive to metals, concrete, and
living organisms, exhibiting the pollutional characteristics
outlined above for low pH waters. Depending on buffering
capacity, water may have a higher total acidity at pH values
of 6.0 than other waters with a pH value of 4.0.
Alkalinity is defined as the ability of a water to
neutralize hydrogen ions. It is usually expressed as the
calcium carbonate equivalent of the hydrogen ions
neutralized.
Alkalinity is commonly caused by the presence of carbonates,
bicarbonates, hydroxides, and to a lesser extent, by
borates, silicates, phosphates, and organic substances.
Because of the nature of the chemicals causing alkalinity,
and the buffering capacity of carbon dioxide in water, very
high pH values are seldom found in natural waters.
Excess alkalinity as exhibited in a high pH value may make
water corrosive to certain metals, detrimental to most
natural organic materials, and toxic to living organisms.
Ammonia is more lethal with a higher pH. The lacrimal fluid
of the human eye has a pH of approximately 7.0, and a
deviation of 0.1 pH unit from the norm may result in eye
irritation for the swimmer. Appreciable irritation will
cause severe pain.
VI-7
-------
Total Suspended Solids
Suspended solids include both organic and inorganic
materials. The inorganic compounds include sand, silt and
clay. The organic fraction includes such materials as
grease, oil, tar, and animal and vegetable waste products.
These solids may settle out rapidly, and bottom deposits are
often a mixture of both organic and inorganic solids.
Solids may be suspended in water for a time, and then settle
to the bed of the stream or lake. These solids discharged
with man's wastes may be inert, slowly biodegradable
materials, or rapidly decomposable substances. While in
suspension, they increase the turbidity of the water, reduce
light penetration, and impair the photosynthetic activity of
aquatic plants.
Suspended solids in water interfere with many industrial
processes, cause foaming in boilers and incrustations on
equipment exposed to such water, especially as the
temperature rises. They are undesirable in process water
used in the manufacture of steel, in the textile industry,
in laundries, in dyeing, and in cooling systems. Solids in
suspension are aesthetically displeasing. When they settle
to form sludge deposits on the stream or lake bed, they are
often damaging to the life in water. Solids, when
transformed to sludge deposits, may do a variety of damaging
things, including blanketing the stream or lake bed and
thereby destroying the living spaces for those benthic
organisms that would otherwise occupy the habitat. When of
an organic nature, solids use a portion or all of the
dissolved oxygen available in the area. Organic materials
also serve as a food source for sludgeworms and associated
organisms.
Disregarding any toxic effect attributable to substances
leached out by water, suspended solids may kill fish and
shellfish by causing abrasive injuries and by clogging the
gills and respiratory passages of various aquatic fauna.
Indirectly, suspended solids are inimical to aquatic life
because they screen out light, and they promote and maintain
the development of noxious conditions through oxygen
depletion. This results in the killing of fish and fish
food organisms. Suspended solids also reduce the
recreational value of the water.
VI-8
-------
Suspended solids are not normally a problem in this
industry. However, suspended solids are generated during
some recovery operations such as precipitation of silver
sulfide and ferro/ferricyanides. These solids are sometimes
recovered for recovery of silver or reuse, respectively.
II. POLLUTANT MATERIALS
Ammonia (NH3)
Ammonium compounds are used in the photoprocessing industry
as constituents in some fix, bleach-fix, and stabilizer
solutions. The ammonium ion can be present in these
solutions at concentrations of 10 to 100 grams per liter and
be present in the plant effluent in concentrations up to 150
mg/1.
Ammonia occurs in surface and ground waters as a result of
the decomposition of nitrogenous organic matter. It is one
of the constituents of the complex nitrogen cycle. It may
also result from the discharge of industrial wastes.
Because ammonia may be indicative of pollution and because
it increases the chlorine demand, it is recommended that
ammonia nitrogen in public water supply sources not exceed
0.5 mg/1.
Ammonia exists in its non-ionized form only at higher pH
levels and is most toxic in this state. The lower the pH,
the more ionized ammonia is formed, and its toxicity
decreases. Ammonia, in the presence of dissolved oxygen, is
converted to nitrate (N03) by nitrifying bacteria. Nitrite
(N02), which is an intermediate product between ammonia and
nitrate, sometimes occurs in quantity when depressed oxygen
conditions permit. Ammonia can exist in several other
chemical combinations including ammonium chloride and other
ammonia salts.
Nitrates are considered to be among the objectionable
components of mineralized waters. Excess nitrates cause
irritation to the gastrointestinal tract, causing diarrhea
and diuresis. Methemoglobinemia, a condition characterized
by cyanosis which can result in infant and animal deaths,
can be caused by high nitrate concentrations in waters used
for feeding. Evidence exists that ammonia exerts a toxic
effect on all aquatic life depending upon the pH, dissolved
VI-9
-------
oxygen level, and the total ammonia concentration in the
water. A significant oxygen demand can result from the
microbial oxidation of ammonia. Approximtely 4.5 grams of
oxygen are required for every gram of ammonia that is
oxidized. Ammonia can add to eutrophication problems by
supplying nitrogen to aquatic life. Ammonia can be toxic,
exerts an oxygen demand, and contributes to eutrophication.
Boron (B) Boron compounds, in the form of borates, are used
in developers, bleaches, and fixers in concentrations up to
one hundred grams per liter. After mixing of the various
waste solutions, the amount of boron in the plant effluent
generally ranges from 1 to 10 mg/1.
Never found in nature in its elemental form, boron occurs as
sodium borate (borax) or as calcium borate (colemanite) in
mineral deposits and natural waters of Southern California
and Italy. Elemental boron is used in nuclear installations
as a shielding material (neutron absorber). It is also used
in metallurgy to harden other metals.
Boric acid and boron salts are used extensively in industry
for such purposes as weatherproof ing wood, fireproofing
fabrics, manufacturing glass and porcelain, and producing
leather, carpets, cosmetics, and artificial gems. Boric
acid is used as a bactericide and fungicide and boron, in
the form of boron hydrides or borates, is used in high
energy fuels.
Boron is present in the ordinary human diet at about 10 to
20 mg/day, with fruits and vegetables being the largest
contributors. In food or in water, it is rapidly and
completely absorbed by the human system, but it is also
promptly excreted in urine. Boron in drinking water is not
generally regarded as a hazard to humans. It has been
reported that boron concentrations up to 30 mg/1 are not
harmful.
Bromide (Br)
Bromides are derived from hydrobromic acid (HBr). Bromide
properties are similar to those of chlorides and iodides.
Bromides are usually produced from bromine, which in turn is
obtained from salt brines or sea water.
VI-10
-------
Bromides are used in medicine as sedatives in the treatment
of nervous disorders. SiIver bromide is used in
photographic films and paper, and bromide compounds are
present in the formulations of bleaches.
Cadmium (Cd)
Cadmium occurs in some, but not all photoprocessing
facilities, because it is an ingredient in some sensitized
products. The cadmium compounds are at least partially
removed during the development portion of the process and
are primarily found in the waste developer.
Cadmium is a relatively rare element that is seldom found in
sufficient quantities in a pure state to warrant mining or
extraction from the earth's surface. It is found in trace
amounts of about 1 ppm throughout the earth's crust.
Cadmium is, however, a valuable by-product of zinc
production.
Cadmium is used primarily as a metal plating material and
can be found as an impurity in the secondary refining of
zinc, lead, and copper. Cadmium is also used in the
manufacture of primary and storage batteries and as a
neutron adsorber in nuclear reactors. Other uses of cadmium
are in the production of pigments, phosphors,
semi-conductors, electrical conductors, and special purpose
low temperature alloys.
Cadmium is an extremely dangerous cumulative toxicant,
causing insidious progressive chronic poisoning in mammals,
fish, and probably other animals because the metal is not
excreted. Cadmium could form organic compounds which might
lead to mutagenic or teratogenic effects. Cadmium is known
to have marked acute and chronic effects on aquatic
organisms also.
Toxic effects of cadmium on man have been reported from
throughout the world. Cadmium is normally ingested by
humans through food and water and also by breathing air
contaminated by cadmium. Cadmium in drinking water supplies
is extremely hazardous to humans, and conventional
treatment, as practiced in the United States, does not
remove it. Cadmium is cumulative in the liver, kidney,
pancreas, and thyroid of humans and other animals. A severe
VI-11
-------
bone and kidney syndrome in Japan has been associated with
the ingestion of as little as 600 ng/day of cadmium. The
allowable cadmium concentration in drinking water is set as
low as 0.01 mg/1 in the U.S. and as high as 0.10 mg/1 in
Russia.
Cadmium acts synergistically with other metals. Copper and
zinc substantially increase its toxicity. Cadmium is
concentrated by marine organisms, particularly mollusks
which accumulate cadmium in calcareous tissues and in the
viscera. A concentration factor of 1,000 for cadmium in
fish muscle has been reported, as have concentration factors
of 3,000 in marine plants, and up to 29,600 in certain
marine animals. The eggs and larvae of fish are apparently
more sensitive than adult fish to poisoning by cadmium, and
crustaceans appear to be more sensitive than fish eggs and
larvae.
Chlorides
Chlorides are found in practically all natural waters. They
may be: (a) of natural mineral origin or derived from a
sea-water contamination of underground supplies, (b) salts
spread on fields for agricultural purposes, (c) human or
animal sewage, or (d) industrial effluents, such as those
from paper works, galvanizing plants, water softening
plants, oil wells, and petroleum refineries.
The human tolerance for chlorides varies with climate and
exertion. Chlorides lost through perspiration are replaced
by chlorides in either the diet or drinking water. From hot
dry areas, there are reports that chloride concentrations up
to almost 900 mg/1 have not been harmful. Chloride
concentrations of 1,500 mg/1 are reported to be safe for
cattle, sheep, swine and chickens. Also, 2,000 mg/1 of
chloride has been reported as not harmful to some fish.
Because of their non-toxic nature, chlorides are not
selected as a pollutant parameter requiring the
establishment of a limitation.
Chromium (Cr)
Sodium and potassium dichromate are principal constituents
of certain bleaches used primarily in the color movie print
VI-12
-------
film process. These compounds in combination with bromide
ions oxidize the developed silver to silver bromide. A
dichromate bleach may also be used in the black and white
reversal process. Again, the primary application for this
process is in the movie industry.
Chromium is an elemental metal usually found as a chromite
(FeCrgO*). The metal is normally processed by reducing the
oxide with aluminum. Chromium and its compounds are used
extensively throughout industry. It is used to harden steel
and as an ingredient in other useful alloys. Chromium is
also used in the electroplating industry as an ornamental
and corrosion resistant plating on steel and can be used in
pigments and as a pickling acid (chromic acid). It is used
in certain chromate bleaches in the photographic processing
industry.
The two most prevalent chromium forms found in industry
wastewaters are hexavalent and trivalent chromium.
Dichromate compounds used in the photographic processing
industry are hexavalent chromium compounds which are
partially reduced to the trivalent form during use.
Chromium can exist as either trivalent or hexavalent
compounds in raw waste streams, although most of the
hexavalent chromium is reduced to the trivalent form when
mixed with other photographic processing wastes,
particularly sulfites and thiosulfates. Hexavalent chromium
treatment involves reduction to the trivalent form prior to
removal of chromium from the waste stream as a hydroxide
precipitate.
Chromium, in its various valence states, is hazardous to
man. It can produce lung tumors when inhaled and induces
skin sensitizations. Large doses of chromates have
corrosive effects on the intestinal tract and can cause
inflammation of the kidneys. Levels of chromate ions that
have no effect on man appear to be so low as to prohibit
determination to date. The recommendation for public water
supplies is that such supplies contain no more than 0.05
mg/1 total chromium.
THe toxicity of chromium salts to fish and other aquatic
life varies widely with the species, temperature, pH,
valence of the chromium and synergistic or antagonistic
effects, especially those of hard water. Studies have shown
VI-13
-------
that trivalent chromium is more toxic to fish of some types
than hexavalent chromium. Other studies have shown opposite
effects. Fish food organisms and other lower forms of
aquatic life are extremely sensitive to chromium, and it
also inhibits the growth of algae. Therefore, both
hexavalent and trivalent chromium must be considered harmful
to particular fish or organisms.
Chromium is not destroyed when treated by a POTW (although
the oxidation state may change), and either passes through
to the POTW effluent or is incorporated into the POTW
sludge. Both oxidation states can cause POTW treatment
inhibition and can also limit the usefulness of municipal
sludge. Hexavalent and trivalent chromium both cause toxic
effects in a wide variety of organisms including aquatic
species and humans. Chromium which passes through a POTW
becomes a potential drinking and bathing water contaminant.
Hexavalent chromium is a known human carcinogen, and is
generally the more toxic of the two oxidation states. As a
result of these considerations, chromium pretreatment
standards must be the same as discharge limitations for
direct discharge.
Cyanide
-------
concentrations of the ferrocyanide ion resulted in a 96-hour
LCSO value of greater than 100 ppm. (The 96-hour LC50 value
is the chemical concentration that will cause a 50 percent
mortality of the test species after the 96-hour exposure.)
Similar tests with lower forms of aquatic life did show
greater sensitivity, i.e., 96-hour LCSO values of 0.1 to 1
ppm for crustaceans (Daphnia magna) and algae growth was
inhibited at ferrocyanide concentrations of 1 to 10 ppm. It
has been shown that the hexacyanoferrate ions are
photochemically active and readily release the cyanide ion
with sunlight exposure. Bioassay tests with 8,000 foot
candles of simulated sunlight resulted in 50 percent minnow
fatalities in about five hours at a 100 ppm ferrocyanide
concentration. This photochemical effect is of concern for
those facilities which use ferricyanide bleach and discharge
the wastewater directly to surface waters.
The large majority of photoprocessing facilities discharge
to POTW's. Laboratory and on-site treatment plant tests
have shown that the hexacyanoferrate ions cause no adverse
effects on the biomass and are resistant to biological
degradation. The treatment plant removal efficiency was
reported to be greater than 60 percent. The
hexacyanoferrate ions are probably precipitated in the
presence of iron, zinc, or calcium ions and are combined
with the waste sludge.
Land disposal is a common disposal method for POTW sludges.
The fate of the hexacyanoferrates under land disposal
conditions has been evaluated with leachate tests in the
laboratory. Such tests were performed using several soil
types and several test sludges ranging in total cyanide
content from 9 to 37,000 mg/kg (dry basis). Evaluation of
the elutriate showed no release, and column tests showed
that the hexacyanoferrates were released from the sludge in
particulate form and were bound within the soil by
adsorption and filtration.
Of all the cyanides, hydrogen cyanide (HCN) is probably the
most acutely lethal compound. HCN dissociates in water to
hydrogen ions and cyanide ions in a pH dependent reaction.
The cyanide ion is less acutely lethal than HCN. The
relationship of pH to HCN shows that as the pH is lowered to
below 7, there is less than 1 percent of the cyanide
molecules in the form of the CN ion and the rest is present
VI-15
-------
as HCN. When the pH is increased to 8, 9, and 10, the
percentage of cyanide present as CN ion is 6.7, 42 and 87
percent, respectively. The toxicity of cyanides is also
increased by increases in temperature and reductions in
oxygen tensions. A temperature rise of 10°C produced a two
to threefold increase in the rate of the lethal action of
cyanide.
In the body, the CN ion, except for a small portion exhaled,
is rapidly changed into a relatively non-toxic complex
(thiocyanate) in the liver and eliminated in the urine.
There is no evidence that the CN ion is stored in the body.
The safe ingested limit of cyanide has been estimated at
something less than 18 mg/day, part of which comes from
normal environment and industrial exposure. The average
fatal dose of HCN by ingestion by man is 50 to 60 mg. It
has been recommended that a limit of 0.2 mg/1 cyanide not be
exceeded in public water supply sources.
The harmful effects, of the cyanides on aquatic life are
affected by the pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen content,
and the concentration of minerals in the water. The
biochemical degradation of cyanide is not affected by
temperature in the range of 10°C to 35°C while the toxicity
of HCN is increased at higher temperatures.
On lower forms of life and organisms, cyanide does not seem
to be as toxic as it is toward fish. The organisms that
digest BOD were found to be inhibited at 1.0 mg/1 and at 60
mg/1 although the effect is more one of delay in exertion of
BOD than total reduction.
Dissolved Solids
In natural waters, the dissolved solids are mainly
carbonates, chlorides, sulfates, phosphates, and to a lesser
extent, ni'trates of calcium, magnesium, sodium, and
potassium, with traces of iron, manganese, and other
substances. The summation of all individual dissolved
solids is commonly referred to as total dissolved solids.
Many communities in the United States and in other countries
use water supplies containing 2,000 to 4,000 mg/1 of
dissolved salts, when no better water is available. Such
waters are not palatable, may not quench thirst, and may
VI-16
-------
have a laxative action on new users. Waters containing more
than 4,000 mg/1 of total salts are generally considered
unfit for human use, although in hot climates such higher
salt concentrations can be tolerated. Waters containing
5,000 mg/1 or more are reported to be bitter and act as a
bladder and intestinal irritant. It is generally agreed
that the salt concentration of good, palatable water should
not exceed 500 mg/1.
Limiting concentrations of dissolved solids for fresh-water
fish may range from 5,000 to 10,000 mg/1, depending on
species and prior acclimatization. Some fish are adapted to
living in more saline waters, and a few species of
fresh-water forms have been found in natural waters with a
salt concentration of 15,000 to 20,000 mg/1. Fish can
slowly become acclimatized to higher salinities, but fish in
waters of low salinity cannot survive sudden exposure to
high salinities, such as those resulting from discharges of
oil well brines. Dissolved solids may influence the
toxicity of heavy metals and organic compounds to fish and
other aquatic life, primarily because of the antagonistic
effect of hardness on metals.
Waters with total dissolved solids (TDS) concentrations
higher than 500 mg/1 have decreasing utility as irrigation
water. At 5,000 mg/1, water has little or no value for
irrigation.
Dissolved solids in industrial water uses can cause foaming
in boilers and can cause interferences with cleanliness,
color, or taste of many finished products. High
concentrations of dissolved solids also tend to accelerate
corrosion. Most of the solids present in photoprocessing
wastewater are dissolved.
Specific conductance is a measure of the capacity of water
to convey an electric current. This property is related to
the total concentration of ionized substances in water and
to the water temperature. This property is frequently used
as a substitute method of quickly estimating the dissolved
solids concentration.
VI-17
-------
Iron (Fe)
Iron is an abundant metal found in the earth's crust. The
most common iron ore is hematite from which iron is obtained
by reduction with carbon. Other forms of commercial ores
are magnetite and taconite. Pure iron is not often found in
commercial use, but it is usually alloyed with other metals
and minerals, the most common being carbon.
Iron is the basic element in the production of steel and
steel alloys. Iron with carbon is used for casting of major
parts of machines, and it can be machined, cast, formed, and
welded. Ferrous iron is used in paints, while powdered iron
can be sintered and used in powder metallurgy. Iron
compounds are also used to precipitate other metals and
undesirable minerals from industrial wastewater streams.
The dissolved iron present in photoprocessing wastewaters
comes from two sources. Iron compounds are used as
bleaches, and iron is added to wastewater by metallic
replacement silver recovery processes.
Iron is chemically reactive and corrodes rapidly in the
presence of moist air and at elevated temperatures. In
water and in the presence of oxygen, the resulting products
of iron corrosion may be pollutants in water. Natural
pollution occurs from the leaching of soluble iron salts
from soil and rocks and is increased by industrial
wastewater from pickling baths and other solutions
containing iron salts.
Corrosion products of iron in water cause staining of
porcelain fixtures, and ferric iron combines with the tannin
to produce a dark violet color. The presence of excessive
iron in water discourages cows from drinking and, thus,
reduces milk production. High concentrations of ferric and
ferrous ions in water kill most fish introduced to the
solution within a few hours. The killing action is
attributed to coatings of iron hydroxide precipitates on the
gills. Iron oxidizing bacteria are dependent on iron in
water for growth. These bacteria form slimes that can
affect the aesthetic values of bodies of water and cause
stoppage of flows in pipes.
Iron is an essential nutrient and micronutrient for all
forms of growth. Drinking water standards in the U.S. have
VI-18
-------
set a recommended limit of 0.3 mg/1 of iron in domestic
water supplies based not on the physiological
considerations, but rather on aesthetic and taste
considerations of iron in water.
Lead (Pb)
Lead is used in various solid forms both as a pure metal and
in several compounds. Lead appears in some natural waters,
especially in those areas where mountain limestone and
galena are found. Lead can also be introduced into water
from lead pipes by the action of the water on the lead.
Lead is not knowingly added to process wastewater in this
industry.
Lead is a toxic material that is foreign to humans and
animals. The most common form of lead poisoning is called
plumbism. Lead can be introduced into the body from the
atmosphere containing lead or from food and water. Lead
cannot be easily excreted and is cumulative in the body over
long periods of time, eventually causing lead poisoning with
the ingestion of an excess of 0.6 mg per day over a period
of years. It has been recommended that 0.05 mg/1 lead not
be exceeded in public water supply sources.
nn^o 1^?d P°isonin9 has occurred among animals at levels
0.18 mg/1 of lead in soft water and by concentrations
under 2.4 mg/1 in hard water. Farm animals are poisoned by
lead more frequently than any other poison. Sources of this
occurrence include paint and water with the lead in solution
as well as in suspension. Each year thousands of wild water
fowl are poisoned from lead shot that is discharged over
feeding areas and ingested by the water fowl. The bacterial
matter is inhibited by leadat
Fish and other marine life have had adverse effects from
lead and salts in their environment. Experiments have shown
that small concentrations of heavy metals, especially of
lead, have caused a film of coagulated mucus to form first
over the gills and then over the entire body probably
causing suffocation of the fish. Toxicity of lead is
increased with a reduction of dissolved oxygen concentration
in the water.
VI-19
-------
Phenols
Phenols, defined as hydroxy derivatives of benzene and its
condensed nuclei, may occur in domestic and industrial
wastewater and in drinking water supplies. Chlorination of
such waters can produce odoriferous and objectionable
tasting chlorophenols.
Although described in the technical literature simply as
phenols, the phenol waste category can include a wide range
of similar chemical compounds. In terms of pollution
control, reported concentrations of phenols are the result
of a standard methodology which measures a general group of
similar compounds rather than being based upon specific
identification of the single compound, phenol (hydroxy-
benzene). Some of the compounds used in photoprocessing
which might be identified as phenols will not respond to
standard analytical tests for phenols and do not impart
taste to water after chlorination.
Phenols are used in some cutting oils and in the molding of
plastics. Cutting fluids can contain phenolic compounds
since these materials are normal constituents of hydrocarbon
mixtures. In addition, phenolic compounds are added to oils
as preservatives or for odor control. They also are found
in the wastewaters from the petroleum industry and from
certain products of the organic chemical industry.
Phenolic compounds may adversely affect fish in two ways:
first, by a direct toxic action, and second, by imparting a
taste to the fish flesh. The toxicity of phenol towards
fish increases as the dissolved oxygen level is diminished,
as the temperature is raised, and as the hardness is
lessened. Phenol appears to act as a nerve poison causing
too much blood to get to the gills and to the heart cavity
and is reported to have a toxic threshold of 0.1-15 mg/1.
Mixed phenolic substances appear to be especially
troublesome in imparting taste to fish flesh. Chlorophenol
produces a bad taste in fish far below lethal or toxic
doses. Threshold concentrations for taste or odor in
chlorinated water supplies have been reported as low as
0.00001-0.001 mg/1. Phenols in concentrations of only one
part per billion have been known to affect water supplies.
VI-20
-------
The ingestion of concentrated solutions of phenol by humans
results in severe pain, renal irritation, shock, and
possibly death. A total dose of 1.5 grams may be fatal
Phenols can be metabolized and oxidized in waste treatment
facilities containing organisms acclimated to the phenol
concentration in the wastes.
Silver (Ag)
The emulsion on photographic film and paper contains as a
principal ingredient various silver halides which form or
assist in the formation of the photographic image. During
processing a portion (black and white materials) or all
(color materials) of the silver is removed from the emulsion
by the fix solution. A principal constituent of the fix
solution is the thiosulfate ion which forms a complex with
silver. The silver thiosulfate complex is stable (it has a
dissociation constant of 3.5 x lO-»*) and non-toxic to fish
(bioassay test showed no effect on fathead minnows after 96
hours of exposure to the silver thiosulfate complex at
concentrations up to 50 mg/1 as silver).
Since the large majority of the photoprocessing industry
discharges to POTW's, the major concern is the fate of the
complex after secondary treatment. Studies have shown that
the secondary treatment microorganisms convert the complex
to silver sulfide and some metallic silver, most of which is
removed from the wastewater stream by settling. The portion
that remains with the wastewater exists as colloidal
suspensions of silver sulfide and silver and a sma1!
fraction of soluble ionic silver. Silver sulfide is
insoluble under normal environmental conditions. Bioassay
tests have shown it to be non-toxic to fathead minnows.
Dynamic 96-hour LCSO tests for silver sulfide showed no
fatalities at a maximum total silver concentration of 250
ppm.
The silver sulfide and silver that settles is removed from
the treatment plant as a constituent of the sludge. Land
disposal by landspreading or landfill ing is a common
disposal method for POTW sludges. Laboratory leachate
testing on test sludges containing silver in concentrations
from 19 to 83,000 mg/kg (dry) showed no release of silver to
the elutriate. Column tests indicated that the silver was
effectively bound by the various soil types.
VI-21
-------
Silver is a soft, lustrous white metal that is insoluble in
water and alkali. It is readily ionized by electrolysis and
has a particular affinity for sulfur and halogen elements.
In nature, silver is found in the elemental state and
combined in ores such as argentite (Ag2S), horn silver
(AgCl), proustite (Ag3AsS3), and pyrargyrite (Ag3SbS3).
From these ores, silver ions may be leached into ground
waters and surface waters, but since many silver salts such
as the chloride, sulfide, phosphate, and arsenate are
insoluble, silver ions do not usually occur in significant
concentration in natural waters.
Silver is used extensively in electroplating, photographic
supplies manufacture, electrical equipment manufacture,
soldering and brazing, and battery manufacture. Of these,
the two major sources of silver wastes are the photographic
and electroplating industries with about 30 percent of U.S.
industrial consumption of silver going into the photographic
industry. Silver is also used in its basic metal state for
such items as jewelry and electrical contacts.
Silver compounds can be absorbed in the circulatory system
and reduced silver deposited in the various tissues of the
body. A condition known as argyria, a permanent greyish
pigmentation of the skin and mucous membranes, can result.
Concentrations in the range of 0.4-1 mg/1 have caused
pathologic changes in the kidneys, liver and spleen of rats.
Silver is recognized as a bactericide, and doses as low as
0.000001 to 0.5 mg/1 have been reported as sufficient to
sterilize water.
Sulfates
Sulfates occur naturally in waters, particularly in the
western United States, as a result of leachings from gypsum
and other common materials. They also occur as the final
oxidized state of sulfides, sulfites, and thiosulfates.
Sulfates may also be present as the oxidized state of
organic matter in the sulfur cycle, but they in turn may
serve as sources of energy for sulfate splitting bacteria.
Sulfates may also be discharged in numerous industrial
wastes, such as those from tanneries, sulfate-pulp mills,
textile mills, and other plants that use sulfates or
VI-22
-------
sulfuric acid. Thiosulfates occur in photoprocessing
wastewater as part of the fix.
In moderate concentrations, sulfates are not harmful, and it
has been reported that concentrations up to 1,000 mg/1 are
harmless. Irrigation concentrations less than 336 mg/1 are
considered to be good to excellent.
Because of their relatively harmless nature, sulfates are
not selected as a pollutant parameter requiring the
establishment of a limitation.
Oxygen Demand (BOD, COD, and TOO
Oxygen Demand
Organic and some inorganic compounds can cause an oxygen
demand to be exerted in a receiving body of water.
Indigenous microorganisms utilize the organic wastes as an
energy source and oxidize the organic matter. In doing so
their natural respiratory activity will utilize the
dissolved oxygen.
Dissolved oxygen (DO) in water is a quality that, in
appropriate concentrations, is essential not only to keep
organisms living but also to sustain species reproduction,
vigor, and the development of populations. Organisms
undergo stress at reduced DO concentrations that makes them
less competitive and less able to sustain their species
within the aquatic environment. For example, reduced DO
concentrations have been shown to interfere with fish
population through delayed hatching of eggs, reduced size
and vigor of embryos, production of deformities in young,
interference with food digestion, acceleration of blood
clotting, decreased tolerance to certain toxicants, reduced
food utilization efficiency, growth rate, and .maximum
sustained swimming speed. Other organisms are likewise
affected adversely during conditions of decreased DO. Since
all aerobic aquatic organisms need a certain amount of
oxygen, the consequences of total depletion of dissolved
oxygen due to a high oxygen demand can kill all the
inhabitants of the affected aquatic area.
It has been shown that fish may, under some natural
conditions, become acclimatized to low oxygen
VI-23
-------
concentrations. Within certain limits, fish can adjust
their rate of respiration to compensate for changes in the
concentration of dissolved oxygen. It is generally agreed,
moreover, that those species which are sluggish in movement
(e.g., carp, pike, eel) can withstand lower oxygen
concentrations than fish which are more lively in habit
(such as trout or salmon).
The lethal effect of low concentrations of dissolved oxygen
in water appears to be increased by the presence of toxic
substances, such as ammonia, cyanides, zinc, lead, copper,
or cresols. With so many factors influencing the effect of
oxygen deficiency, it is difficult to estimate the minimum
safe concentrations at which fish will be unharmed under
natural conditions. Many investigations seem to indicate
that a DO level of 5.0 mg/1 is desirable for a good aquatic
environment and higher DO levels are required for selected
types of aquatic environments.
Biochemical oxygen demand is the quantity of oxygen required
for the biological and chemical oxidation of waterborne
substances under ambient or test conditions. Materials
which may contribute to the BOD include: carbonaceous
organic materials usable as a food source by aerobic
organisms; oxidizable nitrogen derived from nitrites,
ammonia, and organic nitrogen compounds which serve as food
for specific bacteria; and certain chemically oxidizable
materials such as ferrous iron, sulfides, and sulfite which
will react with dissolved oxygen or which are metabolized by
bacteria. In most industrial and municipal wastewaters, the
BOD derives principally from organic materials and from
ammonia (which is itself derived from animal or vegetable
matter).
The BOD of a waste exerts an adverse effect upon the
dissolved oxygen resources of a body of water by reducing
the oxygen available to fish, plant life, and other aquatic
species. Conditions can be reached where all of the
dissolved oxygen in the water is utilized resulting in
anaerobic conditions and the production of undesirable gases
such as hydrogen sulfide and methane. The reduction of
dissolved oxygen can be detrimental to fish populations,
fish growth rate, and organisms used as fish food. A total
lack of oxygen due to the exertion of an excessive BOD can
VI-24
-------
result in the death of all aerobic aquatic inhabitants in
the affected area.
Water with a high BOD indicates the presence of decomposing
organic matter and associated increased bacterial
concentrations that degrade its quality and potential uses.
A by-product of high BOD concentrations can be increased
algal concentrations and blooms which result from
decomposition of the organic matter and which form the basis
of algal populations.
The BOD5 (5-day BOD) test is used widely to estimate the
pollutional strength of domestic and industrial wastes in
terms of the oxygen that they will require if discharged
into receiving streams. The test is an important one in
water pollution control activities. It is used for
pollution control regulatory activities, to evaluate the
designs and efficiencies of wastewater treatment works, and
to indicate the state of purification or pollution of
receiving bodies of water.
Complete biochemical oxidation of a given waste may require
a period of incubation too long for practical analytical
test purposes. For this reason, the 5-day period has been
accepted as standard, and the test results have been
designated as BODS. Specific chemical test methods are not
readily available for measuring the quantity of many
degradable substances and their reaction products. Reliance
in such cases is placed on the collective parameter, BODS,
which measures the weight of dissolved oxygen utilized by
microorganisms as they oxidize or transform the gross
mixture of chemical compounds in the wastewater. The
biochemical reactions involved in the oxidation of carbon
compounds are related to the period of incubation. The
five-day BOD normally measures only 60 to 80 percent of the
carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand of the sample, and
for many purposes this is a reasonable parameter.
Additionally, it can be used to estimate the gross quantity
of oxidizable organic matter.
The BOD5 test is essentially a bioassay procedure which
provides an estimate of the oxygen consumed by
microorganisms utilizing the degradable matter present in a
waste under conditions that are representative of those that
are likely to occur in nature. Standard conditions of time,
VI-25
-------
temperature, suggested microbial seed, and dilution water
for the wastes have been defined and are incorporated in the
standard analytical procedure. Through the use of this
procedure, the oxygen demand of diverse wastes can be
compared and evaluated for pollution potential and to some
extent for treatability by biological treatment processes.
Because the BOD test is a bioassay procedure, it is
important that the environmental conditions of the test be
suitable for the microorganisms to function in an
uninhibited manner at all times. This means that toxic
substances must be absent and that the necessary nutrients,
such as nitrogen, phosphorus, and trace elements, must be
present.
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)
Chemical oxygen demand is a purely chemical oxidation test
devised as an alternate method of estimating the total
oxygen demand of a wastewater. Since the method relies on
the oxidation-reduction system of chemical analyses rather
than on biological factors, it is more precise, accurate,
and rapid than the BOD test. The COD test is widely used to
estimate the total oxygen demand (ultimate rather than 5-day
BOD) to oxidize the compounds in a wastewater. It is based
on the fact that organic compounds, with a few exceptions,
can be oxidized by strong chemical oxidizing agents under
acid conditions with the assistance of certain inorganic
catalysts.
The COD test measures the oxygen demand of compounds that
are biologically degradable and of many that are not.
Pollutants which are measured by the BODS test will be
measured by the COD test. In addition, pollutants which are
more resistant to biological oxidation will also be measured
as COD. COD is a more inclusive measure of oxygen demand
than is BOD5 and will result in higher oxygen demand values
than will the BOD5 test.
The compounds which are more resistant to biological
oxidation are becoming of greater and greater concern not
only because of their slow but continuing oxygen demand on
the resources of the receiving water, but also because of
their potential health effects on aquatic life and humans.
Many of these compounds result from industrial discharges
VI-26
-------
and some have been found to have carcinogenic, mutagenic and
similar adverse effects, either singly or in combination.
concern about these compounds has increased as a result of
demonstrations that their long life in receiving water - the
result of a slow biochemical oxidation rate - allows them to
contaminate downstream water intakes. The commonly used
systems of water purification are not effective in removing
these types of materials, and disinfection such as
chlorination may convert them into even more hazardous
materials.
Thus the COD test measures organic matter which exerts an
oxygen demand and which may affect the health of the public.
It..1?4_.a useful analytical tool for pollution control
activities. It provides a more rapid measurement of the
oxygen demand and an estimate of organic compounds which are
not measured in the BODS test.
organic carbon (TOO is measured by the catalytic
conversion of organic carbon in a wastewater to carbon
dioxide. Most organic chemicals have been found to be
measured quantitatively by the equipment now in use. The
time of analyses is short, from 5 to 1 0 minutes, permitting
a rapid and accurate estimate of the organic carbon content
of the wastewaters to be made by relatively unskilled
personnel .
A TOC value does not indicate the rate at which the carbon
compounds are oxidized in the natural environment. The TOC
test will measure compounds that are readily biodegradable
and measured by the BOD5 test as well as those that are not.
TOC analyses will include those biologically resistant
SJS3"1^ conjPoun<*s that are of concern in the environment.
BOD and COD methods of analyses are based on oxygen
utilization of the wastewater. The TOC analyses estimate
the total carbon content of a wastewater. There is as yet
no fundamental correlation of TOC to either BOD or COD
However, where organic laden wastewaters are fairly uniform,
SrJUU a fairlv constant correlation among TOC, BOD
and COD. Once such a correlation is established, TOC can be
used as an inexpensive test for routine process monitoring.
VI-27
-------
-------
SECTION VII
CONTROL AND TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
Thus far, the Photoprocesstng Industry has been
characterized with regard to processes used, water use,
wastes generated, pollutants of concern, in-process control
technologies used, end-of-pipe treatment technologies
employed, effluent quality, and wastewater discharge
destinations. This section discusses the extent to which
the current use of in-process controls and end-of-pipe
treatments by this industry reduces pollutant discharge.
Other technologies that are either being considered or are
possibly applicable for the treatment of wastewater
generated by photoprocessors are also discussed.
IN-PROCESS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES
The control technologies employed by the photoprocessing
industry are described in detail in Section III of this
document. These consist of process modifications to reduce
discharge of expensive materials such as silver and complex
cyanide salts. Although these practices are used primarily
for resource recovery, their use results in a secondary
benefit of reducing the pollutant load in process
wastewater.
Recovery and Regeneration Processes
An estimate of the extent of use of some in-process controls
and treatments currently used in the industry is shown in
Table VII-1.
As shown in Table VII-1, most of the facilities in the four
largest size categories recover silver and regenerate
ferricyanide bleach. It is also estimated that a similar
proportion of the facilities regenerate their ferric EDTA
bleach and bleach-fix. Recovery of silver from wash water
using ion exchange or reverse osmosis is practiced by only a
relatively small number of the larger facilities. An even
smaller number of facilities regenerate other solutions such
as developers and prewashes. Most facilities which process
VII-1
-------
•^ i
a K
o o o o
o o o o o
o o o
00005
B) N O
* S S 8
g e s a
W ffl N
-------
color reversal (DC) film recover and reuse color couplers
from the developers. The following sections give brief
accounts of both bleach regeneration and silver recovery
techniques in current use and present information on their
capability of reducing wastewater loadings. Developer
regeneration and coupler recovery result in potential
reduction of TOC in the raw waste. For those plants
processing color paper containing cadmium compounds,
developer regeneration also has the potential for reduction
of cadmium in the raw waste. Insufficient data are
available to quantify this reduction.
Bleach Regeneration
Bleach regeneration is used in the industry to reprocess
ferricyanide bleach, EDTA bleach and bleach-fixes. The
environmental benefits of using these techniques are
discussed below.
Tables VII-2 through VII-4 show the environmental benefits
of ferricyanide bleach regeneration and summarize the
combined data obtained during the study. The data presented
in these tables and the succeeding tables in this section
have been extracted from the data tables in Section V and
grouped according to the indicated plant characteristics.
Some of the plants, for which cyanide values are given in
the Section V effluent data tables, are not included in
Tables VII-2 through VII-4. The available information from
the plants not included was insufficient to allow a
determination of the particular bleach treatment category.
The production normalized total cyanide values reported are
based on the areas of product processed with ferricyanide
bleaches. These data are plotted as a cumulative
distribution in Figures VII-1 through VI1-3. Cumulative
distribution plots are used here to show trends or grouping
of data. Sudden changes in slope or discontinuities in the
data displayed in such a plot indicate that the data groups
may belong to different populations.
Considerably lower total cyanide effluent levels result from
the use of regeneration methods. An additional benefit
results in the treatment of the waste fix by ferrous sulfate
(FeS04) precipitation as shown in Table VII-4. It should be
noted that the fix waste is treated and discharged in
batches at the listed plants. The plant effluents
VII-3
-------
represented in Table VII-4 do not contain any treated waste
fix batches. However, data taken from plant 4550's fix
blowdown indicate that the treated waste contributes 0.9
percent of the total cyanide waste load. The processing and
controls used in all plants listed in the table are
comparable to 4550.
EDTA based bleach fixes are also regenerated within the
industry. The benefits here are similar to those described
earlier for the ferricyanide bleaches (i.e., a reduction of
pollutant raw waste loading and a saving of processing raw
materials).
Dichromate based bleaches are not regenerated as such in
this industry. Some plants reconstitute waste dichromate
bleach by discharging about 50 percent of the waste and
reconstitute the remainder by chemical addition.
TABLE VI1-2
Total Cyanide Content in Plant Effluent of Plants
Using Ferricyanide Bleach with No Regeneration
Total cyanide load,
Plant kq/1,000 sq m (lb/1,000 sq ft)
0201 8.3 (1.7)
0204 23 (4.8)
0205 48 (9.8)
0210 21 (4.3)
0218 13 (2.6)
0229 18 (3.6)
Av = 22 (4.5)
VII-4
-------
TABLE VI 1-3
Total Cyanide Content in Effluent of Plants
Using Ferricyanide Bleach Regeneration
Total cyanide load,
kg/1, OOP sq m (lb/1,000 so ft)
0215 4.4 (0.90)
0223 7.3 (1 .5)
1465 7.3 (1.5)
2714 8.3 (1.7)
6208* 0.78 (0.16)
8226* 0.63 (0.13) .-*
Av = 4.8 (0.98)
* These plants are movie labs. Plant 6208 uses
"replenish on demand" system for ferricyanide
bleaches.
TABLE VI 1-4
Total Cyanide Content in Effluent of Plants Using
Ferricyanide Bleach Regeneration plus FeS04
Precipitation Treatment on Waste Fix
Amount,
kg/1,000 sq m (lb/1,000 so ft)
0232 1.3 (0.26)
0233 0.59 (0.12)
0234 2.6 (0.53)
0235 1.4 (0.28)
0236 0.59 (0.12)
0237 1 .4 (0.28)
2465 i.o (0.21)
2488 0.39 (0.08)
3437 0.26 (0.054)
4228 1.4 (0.28)
4550 0.54 (0.11)
4666 1.7 (0.34)
5552 1 .9 (0.39)
6726 0.76 (0.16)
Av = 1 .1 (0.23)
VII-5
-------
©
- s
x E
©
©
©
'1H31N03 30INVA3 1V101
VII-6
-------
. s
©
- s
©
©
©
©
•MMOi/l)TlNaiN03 30INVA31V101
VII-7
-------
©
©
0
0
©
©
©
©
- s
- s
- 5
tK root/fix 'maiNoa aotNVAO ivioi
VII-8
-------
Silver Recovery
There are at least five methods in current use for recovery
of silver from photographic processing solutions. These are
metallic replacement, electrolytic plating, ion exchange,
reverse osmosis, and chemical precipitation.
Tables VII-5 through VII-7 display the environmental
benefits of silver recovery and summarize the information
obtained. Some of the plants, for which silver values are
given in the Section V effluent data tables, are not
included in Tables VII-5 through VII-7. The available
information from these plants was insufficient to allow a
determination of the particular silver recovery category.
The production normalized total silver values reported are
based on the area of all material processed. These data are
plotted as a cumulative distribution in Figures VI1-4
through VI1-6. A considerable reduction in the amount of
silver in the plant effluent is achieved by the use of
standard metallic replacement and electrolytic plating
silver recovery processes.
The group of plants shown in Table VII-7 and Figure VII-6
either hold waste fix in holding tanks pending batch
discharge or contractor haul the waste fix. As a result,
the effluent samples taken from these plants contain no
waste fix. The silver amount in the effluent from these
plants is attributed to carryover of silver into the
after-fix wash. The average quantity of silver (0.11
kg/1,000 sq m) in the effluent of the plants included in
Table VII-7 supports the average silver quantity (0.14
kg/1,000 sq m) for the plants included in Table VII-6 when
the relative amounts of silver in the fix after silver
recovery and the wash water are considered. Although
contractor hauling potentially results in reduced plant
effluent silver levels, the hauled fix must be disposed of
in an environmentally sound manner for this to be a net
env i ronmenta1 benef i t.
Additional reduction of discharged silver can be achieved by
the use of ion exchange or reverse osmosis and chemical
precipitation in addition to the standard processes as shown
in Table VI1-8. At present, most of the industry uses
metallic replacement and electrolytic plating recovery
methods. Ion exchange, reverse osmosis, and precipitation
VII-9
-------
methods are used only at a few sites and then, generally, in
addition to the other methods.
TABLE VII-5
Results of Silver Recovery on Silver Content in Plant
Effluent - No Silver Recovery on Some Processes
Total silver load,
Plant kg/1.OOP sq m (lb/1,000 so ft)
0204 0.47 (0.096)
0205 1.0 (0.21)
0209 0.54 (0.11)
0218 1.4 (0.29)
0223 0.25 (0.051)
0227 0.88 (0.18)
0228 0.034 (0.007)
0229 0.83 (0.17)
0230 0.78 (0.16)
Av = 0.68 (0.14)
VII-10
-------
Plant
0201
0202
0203
0210
0211
0213
0214
0220
0221
0224
0225
0226
0232
0233
1421
1465
2146
2714
5120
8226
TABLE VI1-6
Results of Silver Recovery on Silver Content in
Plant Effluent - Silver Recovery on All Processes
Total silver load,
kQ/1,000 sq m (lb/1,000 sq ft)
0.12 (0.025)
0.17 (0.034)
0.22 (0.045)
0.088 (0.018)
0.17 (0.034)
0.21 (0.044)
0.037 (0.0075)
0.054 (0.011)
0.34 (0.07)
0.073 (0.015)
0.15 (0.031)
0.23 (0.048)
0.13 (0.027)
0.049 (0.010)
0.27 (0.055)
0.13 (0.026)
0.32 (0.066)
0.063 (0.013)
0.0013 (2.6 x 10-4)
0.054 (0.011)
Av = 0.14 (0.029)
VII-11
-------
Plant
0021
0206
0234
0235
0236
0237
0662
1635
2465
2488
3437
3630
4228
4550
4666
5552
6174
6582
6726
TABLE VI1-7
Results of Silver Recovery on Silver Content in
Plant Effluent - Silver Recovery on All Waste Fix
But Waste Fix Not in Sample
Total silver load,
kg/1,OOP so m (lb/1,000 sq ft)
0.16 (0.032)
0.059 (0.012)
0.059 (0.012)
0.19 (0.039)
0.088 (0.018)
0.14 (0.028)
0.12 (0.025)
0.25 (0.052)
0.088 (0.018)
0.10 (0.021)
0.028 (0.0058)
0.043 (0.0089)
0.14 (0.028)
0.078 (0.016)
0.068 (0.014)
0.059 (0.012)
0.054 (0.011)
0.13 (0.026)
0.17 (0.034)
Av = 0.11 (0.022)
VII-12
-------
„ o
_ e
o
E
3
U
O
uib* 0001/*M '1N31NO3 U3A11S
VII-13
-------
-s
®
®
®
-S -
®
®
®
-s
®
®
»s MOI/BX 'main 03 UBAIIS
VII-14
-------
©
©
©
©
©
©
©
©
©
©
--S
- B
•8
-1
S 3
u
9 <=
w IU
'1M31H09 «3A1I$
VII-15
-------
TABLE VI1-8
Results of Silver Recovery on Silver Content in
Plant Effluent - Conventional Silver Recovery on All Waste
Fix plus Additional Recovery By:
Ion Exchange on Wash Water Plus Wash Water Recycle
Total silver load,
Plant kg/1,OOP sq m (lb/1,000 sq ft)
6208 0.048 (0.0098)
Precipitation Plus Reverse Osmosis Treatment of Wash
Water and Wash Water Recycle
7781 • 0.0088 (0.0018)
Table VII-9 compares the efficiencies of individual silver
recovery units used at some of the facilities. These data
show the effects of specific treatments on individual
wastewater streams. The operating conditions used for
either the electrolytic or metallic replacement silver
recovery processes will determine the efficiency of silver
recovery. The efficiencies calculated for reverse osmosis
are based on the incoming water versus the permeate. The
concentrate solution from the reverse osmosis unit contains
high concentrations of silver which should be recovered.
The relative efficiencies of the various types of units are
not directly comparable with each other because of the
varying silver and other pollutant levels in the treated
solutions.
VII-16
-------
TABLE VI1-9
Effectiveness of Various Silver
Recovery Procedures
Concentrations of Silver Present,
(mq/liter)
Plant Recovery Process Influent Effluent
6208 Ion exchange 2.0 0.14
(wash water)
9061 Ion exchange
{wash water)
Unit 1 0.74 0.04
Unit 2 0.60 0.10
4550 Metallic Replace-
ment 1,580 4.7
Electrolytic 576 21
(primary plus
tailing)
7781 Reverse Osmosis 68 14
(wash water)
Chemical Precipi-
tation (RO concen- 57 0.08
trate plus waste
fix)
2714 Reverse Osmosis
(paper wash) 6.3 0.04
Reverse Osmosis
(film wash) 0.99 <0.02
Removal
Efficiency,
Percent
93
95
84
99.7
98
79
99.9
99
98 +
The relationship between the effluent concentration and the
effluent amount for silver and the percent of production
using ferricyanide bleach for total cyanide is shown
graphically in Figures VII-7 and VII-8, respectively. The
graphs show a poor dependency between concentration and
amount for silver or between concentration and production
percentage for total cyanide. Therefore, a concentration
VII-17
-------
based limitation would not necessarily limit the amount
discharged.
A "low-flow prewash" has been used on an experimental basis
at plants 3630 and 6174 to allow conventional recovery of
silver from after-fix wash water. The technique as
described in Section III segments the after-fix wash tank
into prewash and final wash tanks. The prewash tank
receives the fix dragout and has a separate fresh water
anput and overflow. The water input flow is optimized
depending on the rate of waste fix carry-in and its silver
concentration and the final silver treatment level of the
prewash. The benefits of using this system, based on
theoretical calculations and the results from plant 3630,
are shown in Table VII-10. These calculations were made
using the following assumptions:
(1) Paper wash rate = 5.7 liters/min
(2) Silver concentration of normal paper wash = 6.1 mg/1
(3) Bleach-fix silver concentration = 1,900 mg/1
(4) The carry-over flow rate from the bleach-fix
to the wash is calculated to be 0.018 liters/min
Plant 3630 installed a prewash system on a color paper
processor. Silver was recovered from the prewash tank
overflow with a conventional metallic replacement cannister.
The results obtained from this system over a period of 145
days are summarized below and in Table VII-10.
Final wash flow - 5.7 liters/min
Silver concentration in normal paper wash -
1 to 5 mg/1
Bleach-fix silver concentration - 3,000 mg/1
The carryover flow rate from the bleach-fix
to the wash is calculated to be 0.018 liters/min
Silver concentration in final wash - 3.0 +_ 2.5 mg/1
VII-18
-------
o
o
o
o°
o a &
^ <3» O O
O O OG
O
O
©
O
o
EFFLUENT SILVER CONCENTRATION, mo/I
FIGURE VII 7. EFFLUENT SILVER CONCENTRATION VS EFFLUENT SILVER AMOUNT
VII-19
-------
* £
< o
I s
!-j *»
£ 2
s —'
X CB U
I I I
B < O
QG
D O
ca
•
i
'HOiivumasMoa SOIMVAO ivioi
VII-20
-------
TABLE VII-10
Summary of Prewash Results
CR*
mq/1
1
10
100
Prewash Flow
1/min
Percent
Removal
of Silver to
Final Wash
Theoretical Results
43.6
138
436
200
0.76
0.23
0.061
95.4
86.0
59.3
Percent of
Wash Water
Needing
Treatment
13.3
4. 1
1 .1
Experimental Results for Plant 3630
0.10 69 l.B
*CR - Silver concentration of prewash overflow after
silver recovery.
**CT - Silver concentration in prewash tank.
Plant 6174 installed an experimental prewash system on the
paper processors and measured the silver concentration in
the trench containing the rinse wastewater. The silver
concentration of the rinse wastewater before and after
installation of the prewash system averaged 2.8 mg/liter and
0.52 mg/liter, respectively.
Experimentation has shown that there are a number of
potential problems in using the prewash system. These
problems may be caused by trace chemical build-up, increased
fix time, and improper washing. One investigator found an
increase in yellow stain six months after processing and had
problems with biological growth. Plants 3630 and 6174
experienced difficulties in controlling the silver recovery
system on the prewash overflow and had physical quality
problems introduced by required additional squeegees.
Recently a photographic supplies manufacturer, after
extensive evaluation, has approved the use of a low-flow
prewash on the EP-2 NR process as an alternative to the
conventional wash system. The application of a prewash
VII-21
-------
system includes a recommendation for electrolytic silver
recovery on the combined waste bleach-fix and prewash
overflow and metallic replacement silver recovery on the
electrolytic unit effluent combined with the final wash
water. Suggestions for controlling biological growth in the
prewash water holding tank and prewash tank are included.
The recommendations include cleaning the prewash tanks with
a 5 to 12 percent sodium hypochlorite solution at least
weekly or more often depending upon the processing
conditions. .
Wash Water Recycle
Wastewater hydraulic loads can be reduced significantly by
usj.ng countercurrent washing and partial recycle of wash
water. The countercurrent washing referred to here involves
the use of segmented wash tanks after specific chemical
tanks such as bleach-fix. It does not refer to the practice
of pumping the same wash water from one wash tank after a
chemical tank to another wash tank after a different
chemical processing solution. This could result in the
intermixing of chemical solutions in the improper sequence
with the process chemistry. Table VII-11 shows the results
of countercurrent washing and wash water recycle for two
plants. Both plants are large and a major proportion of the
total production is prints made from original negatives
(6208 is a movie lab and 7781 is a portrait studio). The
recycled water is used only for the print processes at 6208
and i£ used for the print process and the final wash on the
negative process at 7781.
The magnitude of the effluent hydraulic load from a
photoprocessing plant is mostly determined by how the plant
handles its process wash water, which is by far the largest
use of water in this industry. The use of countercurrent
washing and partial recycle of wash water after treatment
with reverse osmosis reduces effluent hydraulic loads by
over 90 percent. However, the applicability of these
water-saving techniques depends on the processes used and
the process and product mix at a particular plant. As
discussed in Section III, potential problems such as
biological growth, trace chemical build-up, and insufficient
washing must be controlled to prevent short- and long-term
adverse effects on product quality.
VII-22
-------
TABLE VII-11
Effect of Countercurrent Washing and Wash Water
Recycle on Effluent Hydraulic Loads
Effluent Hydraulic Counter-
Load, 1/1,000 sq m current Recycle of
Plant (gal/1TQOO sq ft) Washing Used Wash Water
6208 98,000 (2,400)* no 30%2
7781 5,010 (123)i yes 60%3
1 Average of 3 24-hour composite samples
2 After ion exchange treatment
3 After reverse osmosis treatment
END-OF-PIPE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
The end-of-pipe treatment technologies employed by
photoprocessing plants were discussed in Section III and
include precipitation, settling, ozonation, filtration,
clarification, aeration, neutralization, equalization,
chlorination, flocculation, and reverse osmosis. Ten of the
twenty plants visited by EPA employed one or more of these
treatment technologies as follows:
VII-23
-------
Plant No. Technologies Employed
1465 ozonation (concentrated streams only)
4229 equalization, settling
3455 equalization, flocculation, precipitation,
clarification, ch1orination, settling,
filtration
9297 equalization, aeration, ozonation, settling
2714 equalization, neutralization, reverse
osmosis (wash water only)
4550 precipitation, flocculation, settling
(only waste fix containing iron-cyanide
complexes)
4849 chlorination (wash water only)
7781 aeration, ozonation, precipitation,
settling, filtration
3075 settling
2387 settling
The effluent compositions obtained by several plants as a
result of the treatments usd-d were shown in Section V. The
two facilities having the most extensive treatment systems
(plants 7781 and 2714) also report the lowest effluent
loadings for BOD, TDS, and other parameters. Also, the
facilities having no end-of-pipe treatments (plants 2465,
4666, 5552, 4228 and 3437) report high effluent loadings of
cyanides, BOD, and TDS. For some parameters, the loadings
from these "no treatment" sites are as much as an order of
magnitude greater than those reported for plants 7781 and
2714. Further inspection of the data shows considerable
variation for a number of parameters even among plants
having no end-of-pipe treatment. The reasons for these
variations lie in differences in specific products
processed, in water usage, and in plant operating
procedures. These factors can influence the amounts of
discharged materials. However, despite the variations in
VII-24
-------
waste loadings observed among plants, it is also observed
that the application of end-of-pipe treatments does
generally lead to reduced discharges of several pollutants.
Cadmium and chromium do not occur in all photoprocessing
waste streams, and no generally applicable treatment
technology was observed being used for these specific
pollutants. Cadmium occurs in the color developer and
bleach-fix wastes of plants using certain papers. The major
manufacturer of papers of this type has indicated their
intention to phase out cadmium. Chromium occurs in the
processing waste streams from one color motion picture film
process and some black and white reversal processes.
Plant 7781 has used ion exchange to remove cadmium from
their wastewaters. The column was eluted and a concentrated
cadmium solution resulted which had to be treated or
disposed of by contractor hauling.
Plants using dichromate bleach can reduce the amount of
chromium in their effluent by treating the plant effluent or
by segregating and treating the after-bleach wash water and
dichromate bleach solution wastes. The wash water and waste
bleach contain a mixture of hexavalent and trivalent
chromium. A waste bleach sample from plant 6208 had a
hexavalent chromium concentration of 1,020 mg/liter and a
total chromium concentration of 1,700 mg/liter. The plant
effluent had hexavalent chromium and total chromium
concentration ranges of <0.02 to 0.44 mg/liter and 2.8 to
3.5 mg/liter, respectively, indicating that most of the
hexavalent chromium was reduced to the trivalent form in the
mixed waste effluent.
Treatment of the total effluent to reduce the amount of
chromium would consist of pH adjustment for precipitation of
the trivalent chromium and clarification. Subsequent
filtration would reduce the chromium to lower levels. The
filter cake containing the precipitated chromium salts would
be disposed of by contractor hauling for landfill ing or
equivalent disposal method.
An alternative method would be to mix the segregated
after-bleach wash and bleach solution wastes and treat the
relatively low volume mixture. The treatment would consist
of hexavalent chromium reduction, pH adjustment for
VII-25
-------
precipitation and diatomaceous earth filtration. This
technology has been successfully demonstrated by the
electroplating industry for treatment of chromium. Chromium
reduction efficiencies of 95 percent were achieved in waste
streams having up to 525 mg/liter chromium. After-bleach
wash water contains up to 100 mg/liter chromium and the
waste bleach approximately 1,700 mg/liter. The mixed waste
solution would have a chromium concentration of about 115
mg/liter based on the relative flows of 20 liters/hr and
2,300 liters/hr of waste bleach and wash water,
respectively. Thus, the photographic wastes are within the
chromium concentration range successfully treated in the
electroplating industry.
Plant 6208 has, on an experimental basis, demonstrated that
further volume reduction of wastewater containing chromium
can be achieved by treating the wash water with an
ion-exchange resin. Chromium was concentrated in the
relatively low volume elutriant from the column and the wash
water was recycled. The elutriant could be treated using
the technology described above. The demonstration unit at
6208 removed chromium from the wash water with an average
efficiency of 92 percent during normal operation.
During the later part of this study, plant 7781 completed
the installation of a system which reduces the discharge of
process wastewater to a minimum. (All hydraulic load and
in-plant and effluent data reported in Sections V and VII
for 7781 result from the in-process control and treatment
system which was in place prior to the modified system that
is described below. The characteristics of the
before-modification system were also described in Sections V
and VII.) The system, shown schematically in Figure VII-9,
consists of conventional and advanced in-process controls to
reduce the production of wastewater and three stages of
wastewater evaporation. In-process controls used on the
film process include prebath recycle, EDTA bleach
regeneration, and continuous silver recovery from the fix
solution. The paper process controls are: developer
regeneration by ion exchange and chemical addition,
bleach-fix regeneration after electrolytic silver recovery,
50 percent stabilizer recycle by chemical addition, and
countercurrent after-fix washing to reduce wash water
volume. All film wash water, except the after-prebath wash,
and the paper wash water are collected and treated with two
VII-26
-------
reverse osmosis units. The permeate is recycled to the
process. The concentrate is combined with the waste film
developer, stop, and all other waste solutions and directed
to the two-stage evaporator. At this point the waste
contains about 2 percent solids. The first stage of the
evaporator increases the solids concentration to about 20
percent and the second stage to about 65 percent. This
wastewater is then pumped to the film wipe evaporator which
increases the solids content of the waste to about 80
percent. The solid waste is sent to a smelter for silver
reclamation. The condensate from both evaporators is
condensed and passed through an ion exchange unit for
reduction of ammonia. The condensed'water is recycled to
the process and the elutriant containing ammonia is used as
lawn fertilizer or disposed of by contractor hauling. The
plant has experienced mechanical difficulties with the
wipe-film evaporator which require periodic repair
maintenance. During these repair periods, the evaporator is
shut down and the 65 percent solids content wastewater from
the two-stage evaporator is contractor hauled.
VARIABILITY FACTOR
Even plants which are achieving state-of-the-art pollutant
reduction occasionally experience days of above average
pollutant discharge. These high days may reflect temporary
imbalances in the treatment system caused by fluctuations in
flow, in raw waste loading, in chemical feed, or in mixing
flows within the tanks. Allowance for the random
variability of the discharge of a well designed and operated
plant may be made by applying a "variability factor" to the
expected long-term average. The expected long-term average
is then multiplied by the variability factor.
The formulation of appropriate variability factors given
below is based upon observed discharge data from operating
plants. The daily maximum and the 30-day average maximum
variability factors, at the 99 percent confidence level,
were calculated using the following relationships:
Daily maximum variability factor = e exp [2.326 SY - 0.5 (SY)*]
Where SY = standard deviation of the natural logarithms of
the measured concentrations
VII-27
-------
VII-28
-------
30-day average maximum = [mean X + 2.326 SX/sq rt 30]/mean X
Where X = measured concentration
SX = standard deviation of the measured concentrations
The results of this analysis on the available long-term data
are shown in Table VI1-12. These data supplied by plants
6208 and 7781 are concentration values obtained from daily
samples of effluent over various time periods. The raw data
are given in Appendix B. A cumulative distribution plot of
the silver data from plant 6208 is shown in Figure VII-10.
VII-29
-------
ir
•rH
1b
I -H £
s
m (N ro| f) fN
,-J -i H| -H C4
»
Ol If! \O
o o o
O **1 4 -H
WWW
•8
H -H
U
VII-30
-------
10
9
8
7
6
s
4 _
3 _
2 _
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
O.S
0.4
ft.3 _
0.2 _
0.1
0,09;
0.08.
0.07.
046.
0.05.
0,04,
0.03 _
0.02 _
0.01
2%
I
15
1
40
r
so
90
95
98%
PERCENTAGE
FIGURE VII-10 LONG-TERM SILVER CONCENTRATION IN EFFLUENT AT PLANT 6208
VII-31
-------
-------
SECTION VIII
COST, ENERGY, WASTE REDUCTION BENEFITS AND NON-WATER
ASPECTS OF TREATMENT AND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES
INTRODUCTION
Costs for the treatment and control of waterborne pollutants
in the photoprocessing industry have been developed for
various levels of technology currently in use in the
industry. These technologies were described in Section III
and their effectiveness was discussed in Section VII.
In developing the costs for the various levels of tech-
nologies, factors such as plant age, space requirements, and
geographic location were considered. Age may indirectly
influence control and treatment costs through the effects of
isolation and control of wastes and space limitations. It
was found that age was not a major cost contributing factor
in this industry. The control and isolation of wastes are
not generally a problem regardless of plant age because, by
the nature of the photographic processing equipment and
operation, wastes can be isolated. It is also observed that
space limitations are not generally a problem because the
control equipment is relatively compact and self-contained.
Geographic location does not significantly affect the costs
of control and treatment technologies in this industry
because processes used are the same throughout the United
States, irrespective of geography or climate.
GENERAL COST REFERENCES AND RATIONALE
Cost information contained in this report was obtained from
industry, engineering firms, equipment suppliers, and
published literature. Whenever possible, costs were taken
from actual installations, engineering estimates for
projected facilities as supplied by contributing companies,
or from equipment suppliers' quoted prices. In the absence
of such information, cost estimates were developed from
actual costs incurred in other industries for treatment of
similar wastes. Such cost estimates were developed for the
treatment of dichromate bleach wastes by using cost
VIII-i
-------
information from the electroplating point source category
for the treatment of chromium-containing wastes.
Interest Costs and Equity Financing Charges
Estimates for this study were based on 15 percent cost of
capital, representing an overall average for either interest
paid or return on investment required.
Time Basis for Costs
All cost estimates are based on 1977 prices and when
necessary have been adjusted to this basis using the
Chemical Engineering facility cost index.
Useful Service Life
The useful service life of treatment and control equipment
varies depending on the nature of the equipment and process
involved, its use pattern, maintenance and numerous other
factors. Individual companies may apply service lives based
on their actual experience for internal amortization.
Internal Revenue Service provides guidelines for tax
purposes which are intended to approximate average
experience. Based on industry practice and condensed IRS
guideline information, a 10-year useful service life value
for control and treatment equipment was used.
Depreciation
The economic value of treatment and control equipment and
facilities decreases over its service life. At the end of
the useful life, it is usually assumed that the salvage or
recovery value becomes zero. For IRS tax purposes or
internal depreciation provisions, straight line, or
accelerated write-off schedules may be used. Straight line
depreciation was used solely in this report.
Capital Investment
Capital investment is defined as all front-end,
out-of-pocket expenditures for providing treatment or
control facilities. These costs include costs for research
and development necessary to establish the process,
equipment, construction and installation, services,
VIII-2
-------
engineering, special start-up costs and contractor profits
and contingencies.
Annual Capital Costs
Most, if not all, of the capital costs are accrued during
the procurement and installation of the equipment. This
present worth sum can be converted to equivalent uniform
annual disbursements by utilizing the Capital Recovery
Factor Method:
Uniform Annual Disbursement = P id + i)nth power
1(1+ i)nth power] - 1
Where P = present value (capital expenditures),
i = interest rate, %/100
n = useful life in years
Using an interest cost of 15 percent and a useful life of 10
years:
Uniform Annual Disbursement = 0.15 P (1.15?*o
= 0.199 P
Land Costs
Land costs are not a significant factor affecting control
and treatment costs in this industry, since the equipment is
generally compact and self-contained and can be housed in
existing facilities. Interior space costs were not
considered.
Operating Expenses
Annual costs of operating the treatment or control
facilities include labor, supervision, materials,
maintenance, taxes, and insurance. Power and energy costs
were estimated by determining the electrical requirements
for the equipment and using five cents per kilowatt-hour for
the cost of electrical energy. Operating costs combined
with annualized capital costs give the total annual costs
VIII-3
-------
for treatment and control. The total annual operating costs
minus the return from recovered silver and chemical cost
savings represent the net annual operating costs. No
interest cost was included for operating (working) capital.
Since working capital might be assumed to be one-sixth to
one-third of annual operating costs (excluding
depreciation), about 1-2 percent of total operating costs
might be involved. This is considered to be well within the
accuracy of the estimates.
It is recognized that all costs and cost benefits for
conventional silver recovery and bleach regeneration are
costs incurred as a result of normal industry business
practice based on economic rather than environmental
incentives. As was shown in Table VII-1, most of the
industry use these in-process controls. Costs for these
controls are included in this section for information
purposes and for those few facilities that do not presently
use them.
Representative Facilities
Some cost information was obtained from the plants studied
and from control and treatment equipment suppliers. These
cost data cover a wide range of plant sizes in terms of
production. To facilitate costing, "typical" plant sizes
were selected as being representative of each of four plant
size categories that cover the range of available cost data.
The "typical" plant production and production range for each
representative category are given in Table VIII-1. Costs
are developed for the "typical" plant in each category in
the following subsections.
CONTROL AND TREATMENT COSTS FOR REPRESENTATIVE
PHOTOPROCESSING PLANTS
Control and treatment costs were developed for various
levels of technology at representative photographic
processing plants. These costs were developed from actual
cost information supplied by the plants studied and from
cost estimates provided by control and treatment equipment
suppliers. The costed control technologies are: (1) various
levels of silver recovery, (2) EDTA bleach regeneration, (3)
ferricyanide bleach regeneration, (4) precipitation of waste
fix for ferricyanide reduction, (5) treatment of dichromate
VIII-4
-------
s
•u
g
fl
*
r4
\4
3
rti
iH
S
•3
1
1
0
&
•C1 u?
e
IT
iH Si
30
0 O
H O O
Qj O *
^r4"i
^^
Lj
5
M ?fc
SL .^
^S^ ^M
rf
01
tr H
w
o
0) O O
Ho o
clo -
"v
"S
cr
m m
W WJ
ra o
0 o o
H O O
">
Is
E
cr 8
. o
flj O O
BiO o
clo -
rr L_4 <*^
&
So
vo iH IO
•«• fH t O 0
(-t I in o in
1 10 M l£> -
O & •* fH i
i 5
l I i i I H
ro i a
C^ O O^ O \& O PI
O • iH . V • \0
. r-i . (N . m • w
o •— • o ^-* o — • ^ >i
fl
-O
S
•rt
1
a
o
in
04
< CQ o a
*
VIII-5
-------
bleach waste for chromium reduction, and (6) use of
conventional and advanced in-process controls and
multi-stage evaporation to reduce process wastewater
discharge to a minimum. Each of the technologies has been
costed separately. To determine the total costs for a
particular plant, the costs for the individual technologies
should be summed depending on the size of the plant and
particular system used.
The best fit regression line shown on all graphs in this
section was determined by regression analysis. This
analysis involved calculating the linear, exponential,
logarithmic, and power regression lines and the coefficient
of determination (r2) which is a measure of goodness of fit.
The regression fit which had the most favorable coefficient
of determination was selected for use in cost deter-
minations.
Silver Recovery
Silver recovery costs were developed for the recovery of
silver from fix solutions using conventional recovery
methods and for the recovery of silver from after-fix wash
water using ion exchange or reverse osmosis. These costs,
as determined for the various typical plant sizes, are given
in Tables VIII-2 through VIII-4.
Specific Costing References and Rationale for Silver
Recovery
Silver Recovery from Fix Solutions Using Conventional
Methods--
Figure VIII-1 is a graph of silver recovery capital
investment costs versus production which includes plant
supplied actual costs and the estimated range of costs
supplied by a major equipment supplier for representative
plant sizes B, C, and D. All costs include installation.
The cost information supplied by the individual plants
includes costs for all types of conventional silver recovery
equipment. The cost data supplied by the equipment supplier
were based on the following assumptions for the B, C, and D
representative plants:
VIII-6
-------
TABIE VIII-2
COSTS FOR RECOVERY OF SIIWER FBCM FIX SOLUTIONS
USING CONVENTIONAL METHODS
Plant Size
Typical Annual Production,
1, 000 sq m/year
(1,000 sq ft/year)
1977 Dollars'
Capital Investment Required
.Annual Costs:
Capital Recovery
Operating and Maintenance
Energy and Power
Total
Annual Resource Recovery
Net Annual Cost (Benefit)
A
35 (375)
4,500
900
340
500
1,740
19,100
(17,360)
B
81 (875)
8,600
1,700
800
500
3,000
44,600
(41,600)
C
350 (3,750)
26,400
5,300
3,400
1,200
9,900
191,000
(181,100)
D
1,740 (18,750)
90,700
18,000
16,800
2,300
37,100
956,000
(918,900)
VIII-7
-------
TABIE VIII-3
COSTS FCR RECOVERY CF SILVER FRCM AFTER-FIX
WASH WATERS BY ICN EXCHAKE
Plant Size
Typical Annual Production,
1, 000 sq in/year
(1,000 sq ft/year)
1977 Dollars
Capital Investment Required
Annual Costs:
Capital Recovery
Operating and Maintenance
Energy and Power
Total
Annual Resource Recovery
Net Annual Cost (Benefit)
A
35 (375)
10,800
2,150
1,900
30
4,080
2,600
1,480
B
81 (875)
10,800
2,150
3,130
70
5,350
6,100
( 750)
C
350 (3,750)
31,200
6,200
10,100
300
16,600
26,000
( 9,400)
D
1,740 (18,750)
90,700
18,000
46,100
1,500
65,600
130,000
( 64,400)
VIII-8
-------
TABIE VHI-4
COSTS FOR RECOVERY OF SILVER FROM AFTER-FIX
WASH T3CERS BY REVERSE OSMCSIS AND PRECIPITATION
Plant Size
Typical Annual Production,
1, 000 sq m/year
(1,000 sq ft/year)
1977 mil firs
Capital Investment Required
Annual Costs:
Capital Recovery
Operating and Maintenance
Energy and Powsr
Total
Annual Resource Recovery
Net Annual Cost (Benefit)
A
35 (375)
15,300
3,000
5,150
800
8,950
2,600
6,350
B
81 (875)
19,400
3,900
6 ,600
800
11,300
6,100
5,200
C
350 (3,750)
34,800
6,900
16,400
1,900
25,200
26,000
( 800)
D
1,740 (18,750)
85,800
17,100
61,000
2,300
80,400
130,000
( 49,600)
VIII-9
-------
<0
o
s <
"
W (0 —
IH UI •
i II
< <§
i ii
o o
5 <
i i
(- "
^ £
sttvnoa jo SONVSHOHI '
VIII-10
-------
(1) Color negative film and paper are processed with a
balance of 10 percent film and 90 percent paper.
(2) A recirculating electrolytic silver recovery system
is used on the film fix with electrolytic "tailing"
on fix overflow.
(3) A batch electrolytic silver recovery system is used
on the paper bleach-fix.
(4) The B plant uses electrolytic tailing only on film
fix overflow, i.e., no recirculating system.
(5) Assumes the B and C plants have two continuous film
processors and the D plant has three continuous
film processors.
(6) Installation costs are included.
The regression analysis of the data presented in Figure
VIII-1 yielded the following relationship between capital
investment for silver recovery equipment and production.
CI = 297.18(P) exp. 0.7666
where:
CI * Capital investment, dollars
P = Production, 1,000 sq m/yr
This relationship was used to calculate the capital
investment costs given in Table VIII-2.
Figure VIII-2 is a graph of silver recovery operating costs
versus production. This curve was derived from plant
supplied actual costs. The regression line is represented
by the following equation:
OC = 9.8119(P) exp. 0.9981
where:
OC « Operating cost, dollars
P = Production, 1,000 sq m/yr
VIII-11
-------
.
« 52
H U
< 2
co
iu O
-II
-8
suvnoa
VIII-12
-------
This relationship was used to calculate the operating costs
in Table VIII-2.
Energy and power estimates for the representative plants
were estimated from power requirements provided by the
equipment supplier, an electrical energy cost of $0.05 per
kilowatt hour, and an assumed 20 hours per day, 250 days per
year operation.
The annual resource recovery cost is a benefit cost that was
derived from the amount of silver contained in the emulsion
of the material processed by the representative plants and a
silver value of $12.00 per troy ounce. The silver recovery
benefit calculation is based on the following:
(1) A color negative plant having a 10:90 film to paper
ratio.
(2) Ninety percent of the total silver in the emulsion
is contained in the fix and ten percent of the
total silver is carried into the after-fix wash
water.
(3) The conventional silver recovery methods yield
ninety percent of the silver contained in the fix,
i.e., 81 percent of the total silver contained in
the processed film and paper.
Silver Recovery from After-Fix Wash Water Using Ion
Exchange—
The costs for the recovery of silver from after-fix wash
water by ion exchange are given in Table VIII-3. These
costs were developed using the following bases:
(1) Information on capital and operating costs was
supplied by ion exchange equipment suppliers.
(2) The amount of equipment for each plant size is
based on an estimate of the after-fix wash water
flow. This estimate is based on the assumption
that the after-fix wash water flow is 50 percent of
the total process water hydraulic load. The
average total process water hydraulic load
determined for the industry is 157,000 liters/1,000
sq m (3,850 gal/1,000 sq ft) based on the data for
VIII-13
-------
70 plants given in Table V-4. Therefore, the
estimated after-fix wash water load is 78,500
liters/1,000 sq m (1,930 gal/1,000 sq ft).
Based on this flow estimate, the numbers of ion
exchange tanks required by the various plant sizes
are:
Plant Size Pairs of Ion Exchange Tanks
A 1
B 1
C 2
D 7
(3) Daily hours of operation for the representative
plants were assumed to be 8, 8, 16, and 24 for the
A, B, C, and D plants, respectively.
(4) The maximum flow rate to each pair of ion exchange
tanks is 57 liters/min (15 gal/min).
(5) The installation costs (part of the capital
investment), which include the necessary plumbing
and electrical work in preparation for delivery of
equipment, are estimated to be $500 per pair of ion
exchange tanks. Also included as installation
costs are ten treated water analyses at $30 each.
These analyses are performed during start-up.
(6) The ion exchange tanks are regenerated off site by
the equipment supplier. The fee charged for this
service is part of the operating cost. The
in-plant operating and maintenance costs include
maintenance labor of one hour per week per pair of
tanks (labor rate at $15,000 per year) plus one
treated water analysis per regeneration at $30
each.
(7) The annual resource recovery cost benefit is based
on the silver recovered from the after-fix wash
water and waste fix. (It is assumed that the waste
fix, after conventional silver recovery, is mixed
with the after-fix wash water.) A total of 19
percent of the silver contained in the emulsion is
VIII-14
-------
available to the ion exchange system (10 percent in
the wash water plus nine percent remaining in the
waste fix after conventional silver recovery).
With an assumed ion exchange efficiency of 80
percent and a silver refining fee of 25 percent,
the silver returned to the plant amounts to 11
percent of the silver contained in the emulsion.
The annual resource recovery was computed for a
10:90 color negative film to paper ratio and with a
silver value of $12 per troy ounce.
Silver Recovery from After-Fix Wash Water Using Reverse
Osmosis and Precipitation—
The costs for the recovery of silver from after-fix wash
water by reverse osmosis and precipitation are given in
Table VII1-4. Plant 7781 used, and supplied cost
information for, a precipitation process to recover the
silver from the reverse osmosis concentrate. It may be
possible to use other methods to recover silver from the
reverse osmosis concentrate, but no cost information was
available for this specific application. Costs for the
reverse osmosis and precipitation processes were developed
using the following bases:
(1) The reverse osmosis capital investment costs versus
flow were provided by an equipment supplier and are
shown in Figure VIII-3. The capital investment
costs for the reverse osmosis equipment were
derived from the following relationship:
CI = 9556 + 0.4016 F
where:
CI = Capital investment, dollars
F - Flow, 1,000 liters per day
The production of the representative plants was
related to the flow by linear scaling of the input
flow to a reverse osmosis unit used by plant 7781.
(2) Reverse osmosis operating and maintenance and power
costs are based on information from an equipment
VIII-15
-------
50-1
REGRESSION LINE EQUATION
INVESTMENT CAPITAL - 9556 + 0.4016 [FLOW)
INVESTMENT CAPITAL. THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS
FLOW, 1000 LITERS/DAY
~T
80
"T
100
FLOW. 1000 LITERS/DAY
FIGURE VIH-3 REVERSE OSMOSIS EQUIPMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT COST VS FLOW
INCLUDES REVERSE OSMOSIS, CONDUCTIVITY CONTROL AKO PREFILTER
VIII-16
-------
supplier. These operating and maintenance costs
include membrane replacement and cleaning solution
costs and labor costs for maintenance and solution
analyses.
(3) The capital investment for the precipitation of
silver from the concentrate was obtained using cost
information for plant 7781 and the following
relationship:
CN = C r exp 0.6
where:
CN = capital investment for representative
plants, dollars
C = capital investment incurred by plant
7781, dollars
r = production ratio of representative plant
to plant 7781.
(4) Precipitation operating and maintenance and power
costs were directly scaled to plant 7781.
(5) The annual resource recovery cost benefit, as in
ion exchange, is based on the silver recovered from
the after-fix wash water combined with the waste
fix (after conventional silver recovery). The
amount of silver recovered is estimated to be the
same as that determined for ion exchange.
EDTA Bleach Regeneration
The costed EDTA regeneration process consists of aeration
with chemical addition. If bleach-fix is the regenerated
material, it is assumed that the silver in the spent
bleach-fix has been recovered by the techniques discussed in
the previous section.
The collected information used to determine costs is
graphically summarized in Figures VIII-4 and VIII-5. The
costs, as determined for the representative plants, are
shown in Table VIII-5.
VIII-17
-------
o o
I- Z
z o
> 2
_S
_8
_I
stnrnoa '
VIII-18
-------
lOO.OOO-i
5 10,000 —
0
REGRESSION LINE EQUATION
i ,000 —
OPERATING COST- 1293.0.0013621PRODUCTIONI
OPERATING COST. DOLLARS
PRODUCTION. 1000 tqm/YEAR
ZOO
600
1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
PRODUCTION, 1000 »»m/VEAR
2000
2400 2600
2800
FIGURE VIII-5 FeEQTA BLEACH REGENERATION OPERATING COSTS VS PRODUCTION
VIII-19
-------
TABIE VIII-5
COSTS FOR FERRIC EETA EEEftCH REGENERATION BY AERATICN
AND CHEMICAL ADDITION
Plant Size
Typical Annual Production,
1,000 sq nvVear
C 1,000 aq ft/year)
1977 Dollars
Capital Investment Required
Annual Costs:
Capital Recovery
Operating and Maintenance
Energy and Power
Total
Annual Resource Recovery
Net Annual Cost (Benefit)
A
35 (375)
2,400
480
1,360
200
2,040
9,200
(7,160)
B
81 (875)
2,500
500
1,400
200
2,100
21,000
(18,900)
C
350 (3,750)
2,900
600
2,100
600
3,300
93,300
(90,000)
D
1,740 (18,750)
4,900
1,000
13,800
1,000
15,800
465,000
(449,200)
VIII-20
-------
Specific Costing References and Rationale for EDTA
Bleach Regeneration
Figure VIII-4 is a graph of EDTA bleach regeneration capital
investment costs versus production which represents plant
supplied actual costs and the estimated costs supplied by a
control equipment supplier for the representative plants.
The costs include installation. The cost data supplied by
the equipment supplier were based on the following
assumptions for the representative plants:
(1) Color negative film and paper are processed with a
balance of 10 percent film and 90 percent paper.
(2) The film process uses EDTA bleach and the paper
process uses bleach-fix with a ferric EDTA base.
The following relationship between capital investment and
production was derived by a regression analysis of the data
presented in Figure VIII-4:
CI = 2384 + 1.445 P
where:
CI « Capital investment, dollars
P - Production, 1,000 sq m/yr
This relationship was used to calculate the capital
investment costs presented in Table VII1-5.
Figure VIII-5 is a graph of EDTA bleach regeneration
operating costs versus production which represents plant
supplied actual costs. The following relationship between
operating costs and production was derived:
OC * 1293 e exp. 0.001362P
where:
OC - Operating cost, dollars
P = Production, 1,000 sq m/yr
The energy and power requirements were assumed to be for 1,
1, 3, and 5 horsepower motors, for the A, B, C, and D
VIII-21
-------
plants, respectively, to operate air compressors for
aeration. Electric energy costs were assumed to be $0.05
per kilowatt hour with an operation time of 20 hours per
day, 250 days per year.
Annual resource recovery benefits are based on the chemical
savings gained by not disposing of the bleach. The
determination was made, for each plant size, by taking 80
percent of the bleach chemical costs and subtracting the
cost of the bleach regenerate chemicals. The following
assumptions were made:
(1) Eighty percent of the waste bleach is regenerated.
(2) To determine bleach and bleach regenerate costs,
price information for the C-41 color film and for
the EP-2 color paper processes was used.
(3) Replenishment rates of 0.925 liters/sq m (0.0227
gal/sq ft) and 0.322 liters/sq m (0.0079 gal/sq ft)
were used for the C-41 bleach and the EP-2
bleach-fix, respectively.
Ferricvanide Bleach Regeneration
The costed ferricyanide bleach regeneration process utilizes
ozonation for regeneration. The costs, as determined for
the representative plants, are shown in Table VIII-6.
Specific " Costing References and Rationale for
Ferricvanide Bleach Regeneration
The specific capital investment cost information was
supplied by a control equipment supplier. The equipment for
the representative plants are listed below:
VIII-22
-------
TABLE VIII-6
COSTS FOR EERRICYANIDE BLEACH REGENERATION BY OZONATION
Plant Size
Typical Annual Production
"(Film Only) ,
1,000 sq rr/year
(1,000 sq ft/year)
1977 Dollars
Capital Investment Required
Annual Costs:
Capital Recovery
Operating and Maintenance
Energy and Power
Total
Annual Resource Recovery
Net Annual Cost (Benefit)
A
3.5 (37.5)
21,400
4,300
3,400
10
7,710
1,100
6,610
B
8.1 (87.5)
21,400
4,300
3,400
20
7,720
2,500
5,220
C
35 (375)
25,500
5,100
3,400
100
8,600
10,900
( 2,300)
D
174 (1,875)
33,500
6,700
3,400
500
10,600
54,500
(43,900)
Pollutant Parameter,
kgA'OOO sq m
Cyanide, Total
Effluent Without
Treatment
22
Effluent With
Treatment
4.8
VIII-23
-------
A and B plant - batch system
ozone generator
ozone monitor
pH control
pump
50-gallon tank
C and D plant -
continuous on-line system
ozone generator
ozone monitor
pH control
pump
100-gallon tank
automatic controls
The ozone generator was costed by selecting the nearest
larger size commensurate with the plant ozone requirements
based on the amount of film processed using ferricyanide
bleach. The ozone requirement was related to production as
stated in process specifications.
Operating costs are based on the costs given for a "typical"
plant using ozone regeneration in a film processor's
publication. Energy and power costs for the representative
plants are based on a power requirement of 10 kwh per 0.45
kg (1 Ib) of ozone generated, an ozone amount of 2.4
kg/1,000 sq m (0.48 lb/1,000 sq ft), and a power cost of
$0.05 per kwh. Annual resource recovery benefit was based
on chemical savings between a plant using regeneration as
compared to a plant discharging the spent bleach,
Ferrous Sulfate Precipitation of_ Ferricyanide
The costs established in this section are for a system to
cause the precipitation of ferricyanide bleach carryover
from waste • fix. The costs, as determined for the
representative plants, are shown in Table VIII-7.
VIII-24
-------
TABI£ VIII-7
COSTS FOR FEBRQUS SfLFATE PRECIPITATION OF FERRICYANIDE FROM WASTE FIX
Plant Size
Typical Annual Production
(Film Only)
1,000 sq ^year
(1,000 sq ft/year)
1977 nmirtrs
Capital Investment Required
Annual Costs:
Capital Recovery
Operating and Maintenance
Energy and Power
•total
Annual Resource Recovery
Net Annual Cost (Benefit)
A
3.5 (37.51
4,600
920
600
10
1,530
—
1,530
B
8,1 (87.5)
6,500
1,300
1,220
20
2,540
—
2,540
C
35 (375)
9,200
1,830
4,490
60
6,380
—
6,380
D
174 (1,875)
22,200
4,400
21,400
300
26,100
—
26,100
Pollutant Parameter,
kg/1,000 sq m
Cyanide, Total
Effluent Without
Treatment
4.8
Effluent With
Treatment
1.3
VIII-25
-------
Specific Costing References and Rationale for Ferrous
Sulfate Precipitation
The equipment required for ferrous sulfate precipitation of
ferricyanide from waste fix is based on the equipment used
by plant 4550 which includes pumps, tanks, and mixers. The
equipment was sized for the representative plants according
to their relative production compared to plant 4550. The
capital investment was determined from individual equipment
costs provided by suppliers. Related capital investment
costs such as engineering, drafting, mechanical
installation, and electrical work were determined from the
following relationship:
CN » C r exp 0.6
where:
CN = capital investment for representative plant,
dollars
C = capital investment incurred by plant 4550,
dollars
r = production ratio of representative plant to
plant 4550.
Operating and maintenance and power costs for the
representative plants were assumed to be directly
proportional to these costs for plant 4550.
Evaporation and Associated Technologies to Reduce the
Discharge of Process Wastewater to a Minimum
Costs were derived for the reduction of process wastewater
discharge to a minimum from information supplied by plant
7781 which is currently using the technology. The
technology, using a number of techniques as described in
Section VII to minimize the hydraulic load, utilizes
multi-stage evaporation to reduce wastewater discharge. The
costs, as determined for representative plants, are shown in
Table VIII-8.
VIII-26
-------
TABIE VIII-8
CESTS FOR EDUCTION OF PBOCESS WAffTEWATER TO A MTNIM3M
BY ADVANCED CCNTBOLS PLUS MULTI-STATE EVAPORATION
'•. Plant Size
i
• Typical Annual Production,
| I", 000 sq m/year
1 (1,000 sq ft/year)
i
|
1 1977 Collars
i
| Capital Investment Pequired
i Annual Costs:
: Capital Secovery
i
| Operating and Maintenance
! aiergy and Power
Total
; Annual Sesource Recovery
j Net Annual Cost (Benefit)
A
35 (375)
103,000
20,500
21,000
400
41,900
4,200
37,700
B
81 (875)
155,000
30,800
21,000
400
52,200
9,900
42,300
C
350 (3,750)
239,000
47,600
43,100
1,800
92,500
42,400
50,100
D
1,740 (18,750)
406,000
80,800
74,700
8,700
164,200
212,000
(47,800)
VIII-27
-------
Specific Costing References and Rationale for the
Reduction of. Process Wastewater to a Minimum
Specific capital investment, operating, energy and power and
annual resource recovery benefit costs were supplied by
plant 7781. The information included costs for reverse
osmosis treatment of wash water, developer regeneration by
ion exchange, evaporation, and the reduction of ammonia in
the condensate.
The capital investment costs were estimated by plant 7781
for the representative plants. Costs for special analytical
equipment required for process control are included. The
equipment includes a spectrophotometer and an atomic
adsorption spectrometer.
The remainder of the costs for the representative plants
were derived by linear scaling of the actual costs incurred
by plant 7781. Labor costs for a full time analytical
chemist was added to the operating costs. This cost is
based on a salary of $20,000 per annum, 3 shifts per day in
the D plant, 2 shifts per day in the C plant and 1 shift per
day in the A and B plants.
Treatment of Dichromate Bleach Wastes
Treatment technologies, along with the associated costs,
have been established for the electroplating industry for
reduction of the quantity of chromium in wastewater. The
technology includes the chemical reduction of hexavalent
chromium, pH adjustment for chromium precipitation, and
diatomaceous earth filtration. It is recommended that these
technologies be applied to after-dichromate bleach wash
water mixed with the bleach overflow.
The costs are given in Tables Viii-9 through VIII-12. These
costs were available in terms of flow. Film production
levels comparable to these flows are included in the tables.
This determination is based on an after-bleach wash water
flow of 38 liters per minute (10 gallons per minute) and a
film processing rate of 173 square meters per hour (1,865
square feet per hour).
VIII-28
-------
TABIE VIII-9
CCWTPOL AND TREA3MENT COSTS FOR HEXAVaLENT CHROMIUM
REDUCTION - BOTCH TFEAIMENT
Flow, liters/hour
Annual Film Production,
1,000 sq id/year
(1,000 sq ft/year)
1977 Dollars
Capital Investment Required
Annual Costs:
Capital Cost
Operating and Maintenance
Energy and Power
Depreciation
Met Annual Cost (Benefit)
189
72 (780)
8,493
541
155
256
1,699
2,651
379
140 (1,500)
9,535
608
295
256
1,907
3,066
1,893
720 (7,750)
14,405
919
1,415
256
2,881
5,471
VIII-29
-------
TAEI£ VHI-10
CONTROL AND TJEKDEW COSTS FOR HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM
REDUCTION - CONTINUOUS TREATMENT
Flow, liters/ "hour
Annual Film Production
1,000 sq ir/year
(1,000 sq fVyear)
1977 Dollars
Capital Investment Required
Annual Costs:
Capital Cost
Operating and I^aintenance
Energy and Power
Depreciation
Net Annual Cost (Benefit)
3,785
1,400 (15,100)
20,416
1,303
1,086
256
4,083
6,728
7,570
2,900 (31,200)
21,538
1,374
1,375
256
4,308
7,313
18,925
7,200 (77,500)
24,C03
1,531
2,089
256
4,301
8,677
VIII-30
-------
«,«,«.»>«»•«
-------
-------
NON-WATER QUALITY ASPECTS
It is important to consider the impact of each treatment
process on air, noise, solid waste, and radiation pollution
of the environment to recognize and avoid the potential
development of an adverse environmental impact upon these
other media.
None of the control or treatment technologies considered for
the photoprocessing industry have any known potential for
air, noise, or radiation pollution exterior to the plant.
There could be possible in-plant air pollution problems from
the use of ozone or improper use of sulfide precipitation
compounds. Proper use and monitoring equipment will control
any potential hazard to plant personnel. Ozonation
generators and reverse osmosis units create high but
non-hazardous noise levels in the area close to the
equipment. This problem can be alleviated with proper
location and enclosure of the equipment.
The major potential non-water environmental impact from this
industry is the potential generation of solid wastes.
Solids generated from silver recovery are not a problem
because of the obvious economic recovery value of the
silver. Waste sludge from the precipitation of ferrocyanide
wastes presents a solid waste disposal problem. One
multi-plant company processes this sludge at a central
location to reclaim the ferricyanide. Plants which do not
reprocess this sludge will have to dispose of the solid
waste in an approved landfill or other environmentally
acceptable manner. Solid wastes generated from the
treatment of waste dichromate bleach have no known market.
These wastes must be disposed of in an approved landfill or
other environmentally acceptable manner. Solid wastes are
also generated from the plant using evaporation to eliminate
process water discharge. The plant reports that the silver
content is high enough to make it acceptable to a smelter
for silver reclamation.
VIII-33
-------
-------
SECTION IX
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The Environmental Protection Agency was aided in the
preparation of this Guidance Document by Versar Inc.
Versar's effort was managed by Mr. Edwin Abrams with Mr.
Lawrence G. Davies serving as principal investigator.
Mr. Richard Kinch and Mr. John Newbrough of the EPA's
Effluent Guidelines Division served as Project Officers
during the preparation of this document. Mr. Robert
Schaffer, Director, Effluent Guidelines Division, and Mr.
Gary E. Stigall, Branch Chief, Effluent Guidelines Division,
Inorganic Chemicals Branch, offered guidance and suggestions
during this project.
Appreciation is extended to the National Association of
Photographic Manufacturers, Inc. and the individual
companies and plants that participated in and contributed
data for the formulation of this document.
IX-1
-------
-------
SECTION X
BIBLIOGRAPHY
American National Standard: Dimensions of Aerial Film
Spools. American National Standards Institute, Inc.,
New York, New York, 1972.
American National Standard: Dimensions for Film in Rolls for
Phototypesetting or Photocomposing Devices, or Both.
American National Standards Institute, Inc., New York,
New York, 1972.
American National Standard: Dimensions for Graphic Arts
Sheet and Roll Films. American National Standards
Institute, Inc., New York, New York, 1973.
American National Standard: Dimensions for Industrial
Radiographic Sheet and Roll Films. American National
Standards Institute, Inc., New York, New York, 1973.
American National Standard: Dimensions for 135-size Film
Magazines and Film for 135-size Still-Picture Cameras.
American National Standards Institute, Inc., New York,
New York, 1976.
American National Standard: Dimensions for Photographic
Films in Rolls for Recording Instruments and
Miscellaneous Uses. American National Standards
Institute, Inc., New York, New York, 1973.
American National Standard: Dimensions for Professional
Sheet and Roll Films. American National Standards
Institute, Inc., New York, New York, 1973.
American National Standard: Dimensions for Unperforated and
Perforated Photographic Film in Rolls, Including Leaders
and Trailers, for Aerial and Related Uses. American
National Standards Institute, Inc., New York, New York,
1976.
American National Standard: Specifications for Photographic
Film for Archival Records, Silver-Gelatin Type, on
X-l
-------
Polyester Base. American National Standards Institute,
New York, New York.
American National Standard: Specifications for Photographic
Film for Arch ival Records, Si1ver-Gelat in Type, on
Cellulose Ester Base. American National Standards
Institute, New York, New York.
American National Standard: Test Method for the
Determination of Ferro- and Ferricyanide in Photographic
Processing Effluents. American National Standards
Institute, Inc., New York, New York, 1976.
Arthur D. Little, Inc. Economic Analysis of Interim Final
Effluent Guidelines for the Photographic Processing
Industry. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, April
1976.
Bard, C. C., J. J. Murphy, D. L. Stone, and C. J. Terhaar.
Silver in Photoprocessing Effluents. Journal of Water
Pollution Control Federation, 48{2):389-394, 1976.
Bober, Thomas W. and Thomas J. Dagon. Ozonation of
Photographic Processing Wastes. Journal of Water
Pollution Control Federation, 47(8):2114-2129, 1975.
Buyers, Archie G., et al. Development and Application of
Ion Exchange Silver Recovery System. University of New
Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, May 1974. 72 pp.
Carroll, John S. Amphoto Lab Handbook. American
Photographic Book Publishing Company, Inc., New York,
New York, 1970.
Color Print. Modern Photography, 43(2):92-93, 118-121, 124,
134-142, 176, 1979.
Cooley, Austin C. Regeneration and Disposal of Photographic
Processing Solutions Containing Hexacyanoferrate.
Journal of Applied Photographic Engineering, 2(2):61-64,
1976.
Cooley, Austin C. and Thomas J. Dagon. Current Silver
Recovery Practices in the Photographic Processing
X-2
-------
Industry. Journal of Applied Photographic Engineering,
2(1):36-41, 1976.
CPAC - Pollution Abatement Division. Wastewater Control
Program for: Naval Intel1igence Support Center. No.
N62477-74-C-0308, Leicester, New York. 70 pp.
Dagon, Thomas J. Biological Treatment of Photo Processing
Effluents. Journal of Water Pollution Control
Federation, 45 (10):2123-2135.
Dagon, Thomas J. Processing Chemistry of Bleaches and
Secondary Processing Solutions and Applicable
Regeneration Techniques. Journal of Applied
Photographic Engineering, 2(1):42-45, 1976.
Daignault, Louis G. Pollution Control in the
Photoprocessing Industry through Regeneration and Reuse.
Journal of Applied Photographic Engineering, 3(2):93-96,
1977.
Degenkolb, David J. and Fred J. Scobey. Handling and
Control of Chemicals in a Modern Motion-Picture
Laboratory. Journal of the Society of Motion Picture
and Television Engineers, 81(6):465-469, 1972.
Degenkolb, David J. and Fred J. Scobey. Monitoring the
Processing Chemical Costs and Effluents of a
Motion-Picture Processing Laboratory. Journal of the
Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers,
84:599-603, 1975.
Degenkolb, David J. and Fred J. Scobey. Silver Recovery
from Photographic Wash Waters by Ion Exchange. Journal
of the Society of Motion Picture and Television
Engineers, 86(2):65-68, 1977.
Battelle Columbus Laboratories. Development Document for
Interim Final Effluent
Limitation Guidelines and Proposed New Source
Performance Standards for the Metal Finishing Segment of
the Electroplating Point Source Category.
EPA-440/l-75/040a, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, D.C. April 1975. 235 pp.
X-3
-------
Development Document for Proposed Existing Source
Pretreatment Standards for the Electroplating Point
Source Category. EPA-440/1-78/085, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, February 1978. 532 pp.
Eastman Kodak Company. Aerobic Photodegradation of X(N)
delates of (Ethylenedinitrilo) Tetraacetic Acid (EDTA).
Environmental Science and Technology, 9{12):1035-1038,
1975.
Eastman Kodak Company. Data Release. No. J-9X. Rochester,
New York, 1978. 2 pp.
Eastman Kodak Company. Kodak Photographic Products,
1975-1976. Rochester, New York, 1976.
Eastman Kodak Company. 1976 Index to Kodak Information.
No. L-5. Rochester, New York, 1976. 46 pp.
Eastman Kodak Company. Sampling and Flow-Measurement
Methods. No. J-50. Rochester, New York, 1976. 27 pp.
Eastman Kodak Company. Silver Recovery with Kodak Chemical
Recovery Cartridge Type P. No. J-9. Rochester, New
York, November 1979.
Eastman Kodak Company. "Low-F1ow Prewash" Means Pr i nt
Stability Compromise, Current Information Summary,
September 1979. CIS-25. Rochester, New York.
Eastman Kodak Company. Silver Recovery with the Kodak
Chemical Recovery Cartridge Type 3, January 1980, J9A.
Rochester, New York.
Eastman Kodak Company. Recovering Silver from Photographic
Materials, March 1980, J10. Rochester, New York.
Eastman Kodak Company. Potential Silver Yield from
Photographic Products, December 1979, J10A. Rochester,
New York.
Eastman Kodak Company. Disposal of Photographic Processing
Effluents and Solutions, January 1973, J-28. Rochester,
New York.
X-4
-------
Eastman Kodak Company. BOD5_ and COD of Kodak Photographic
Chemicals, December 1973, J-41 . Rochester, New York.
Eastman Kodak "Company. The Regeneration of Ferricyanide
Bleach Using Ozone, September 1974, J-43. Rochester,
New York.
Eastman Kodak Company. In Support of Clean Water
Disposing of Effluents from Film Processing, September
1979, J-44. Rochester, New York.
Eastman Kodak Company. The Filter Press for the 'Filtration
of Insoluble Photographic Processing Wastes, January
1973, J-45. Rochester, New York.
Eastman Kodak Company. The Biological Treatment of
Photographic Processing Effluents, August 1975, J-46.
Rochester, New York.
Eastman Kodak Company. Chemical Composition of Photographic
Processing Solutions, April 1975, J-47. Rochester, New
York.
Eastman Kodak Company. Silver in Photoprocessing Effluents,
July 1976, J-51. Rochester, New York.
Eastman Kodak Company. Disposal of Photographic Processing
Solutions for the Small User, 1976, J-52. Rochester,
New York.
Eastman Kodak Company. The Use of Water in Photographic
Processing, March 1978, J-53. Rochester, New York.
Eastman Kodak Company. Water Conservation in Photographic
Processing, July 1973, S-39. Rochester, New York.
Eastman Kodak Company. Using Kodak Ektaprint 2 Bleach-Fix
and Replenisher NR in Continuous Color Print Processors.
Data Release Z-122G, Revised March 1980. Rochester, New
York.
Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Second Edition, Vol.
15. Wiley, New York, New York, 1968. pp. 371-389.
X-5
-------
Ericson, Franklyn A. Effluent Sampling and Flow Measurement
for the Photoprocessor. Journal of Applied Photographic
Engineering, 2(2):51-60, 1976.
EROS Data Center. Processing Information for EROS Data
Center Waste Treatment System. No. OPL4-7. U.S.
Geological Survey, 1975.
An Evaluation of the Mead Technology Laboratories Aqua-Fix
Waste Disposal System. Directorate of Avionics
Engineering, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio, August 1976.
Fatora, David A. Wash Water Recycling by Catalytic
Oxidation of Thiosulfates and Sulfites. Journal of
Applied Photographic Engineering, 2(4):227-228, 1976.
Fields, Alfred E. Reducing Wash Water Consumption in
Photographic Processing. Journal of Applied
Photographic Engineering, 2(3):128-133, 1976.
Focal Encyclopedia of Photography, Vol. I. Focal Press, New
York, New York, 1965. pp. 278-281.
Focal Encyclopedia of Photography, Vol. II. Focal Press,
New York, New York, 1965. pp. 1672-1675, 1185-1187.
Gale, Robert 0., and Allan L. Williams. Factors Affecting
Color Film Dye Stability: Relating Printing Problems and
Release Print Quality, Journal of the SMPTE, Vol. 72,
October 1963. pp. 804-8-09.
SPSE Handbook of Photographic Science and Engineering.
Woodlief Thomas, Jr., ed. Wiley-Interscience, New York,
New York, 1973. pp. 609-622.
Haderer, P. A. and J. A. Defilippi. Reducing
Photoprocessing Wastes through Reuse and Recycling.
Industrial Photography, June 1977. pp. 22-23, 42-45.
Hendrickson, Thomas N. The Zero-Discharge Law and the
Motion-Picture Film Processing Industry. Journal of the
Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers, July
1973.
X-6
-------
Hendrickson, Thomas N. and Louis G. Daignault. Treatment of
Complex Cyanide Compounds for Reuse or Disposal.
EPA-R2-73-269, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, D.C., June 1973. 151 pp.
Image Technology. Journal of
Engineering, 4(2):93-96, 1978.
Applied Photographic
In-Process Pollution Abatement. EPA 625/3-73-002, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency Technology Transfer
Seminar Publication, July 1973. 69 pp.
Iwano, H., T. Hatano, S. Matsushita, and K. Shirasu.
Regeneration of Ferric-EDTA-Thiosulfate Bleach-Fix
Solution by Anion-Exchange Resins. Journal of Applied
Photographic Engineering, 2(2):65-69, 1976.
Johnson, D. W. Precipitation Techniques.
reference unknown. 17 pp.
Publication
Kennedy, David C. Prediction of Ion-Exchange Sorption of
Metal Ions from Complex Ion Formation Data. Presented
at 171st National ACS Meeting, New York, New York, April
1976. 32 pp.
Kennedy, David C., Mark A. Kimler, and Carol A. Hammer.
Functional Design of a Zero-Discharge Wastewater
Treatment System for the National Center for
Toxicological Research. Presented at the 31st Annual
Purdue Industrial Waste Conference, May 1976. 19 pp.
Kleppe, J. Wesley. Practical Application of an Ion Exchange
Method for Color-Developer Reuse. Journal of the SMPTE,
88:168-170. March 1979.
Kleppe, J. Wesley. The Application of an Ion Exchange
Method for Color Developer Reuse, Journal of Applied
Photographic Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 3, Summer 1979.
pp. 132-135.
LaPerle, Robert L. Removal of Metals from Photographic
Effluent by Sodium Sulfide Precipitation. Journal of
Applied Photographic Engineerins, 2(3):134-146, 1976.
X-7
-------
Lorenzo, George A. and Michael A. Claprood. Treatment of
Photographic Wash Waters for Reuse or Disposal.
Presented at SPSE 14th Annual Fall Symposium,
Washington, D.C., October 1974. 20 pp.
The Manufacture and Use of Selected Inorganic Cyanides, Task
III. EPA 560/6-75-012, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, D.C., January 1976. 213 pp.
Mees, C. E. Kenneth. The Theory of the Photograph i c
Process. The Macmillan Company, New York, New York.
pp. 1047-1087.
Mina, R. Silver Recovery from Photographic Effluents By
Ion-Exchange Methods. Presented at the SPSE Symposium
on Photofinishing in the 1980's, March 21, 1980.
National Association of Photographic Manufacturers, Inc.
American National Standard on Photographic Processing
Effluents. Harrison, New York, April 1975. 42 pp.
National Association of Photographic Manufacturesr, Inc.
Survey Form. May 1976. 23 pp.
Oregon State University. Toxicity to Fish of Cyanides and
Related Compounds: A Review, U.S. Department of
Commerce, April 1976. PB 253-528.
Owerbach, Daniel. The Instability of Free Cyanide in
Photographic Processing Effluents. Journal of Applied
Photographic Engineering, 4(2):72-76, 1978.
Pathways of Photoprocessing Chemicals in Publicly Owned
Treatment Works. National Association of Photographic
Manufacturers, Inc. 1977. 91 pp.
Photo Film Achieves Zero Waste Discharge. Chemical and
Engineering News Magazine, July 1978.
Photographic Processing Effluent Control. Journal of
Applied Photographic Engineering, 4(2):62-71, 1978.
Photo Processing Sludge: New Comstock Lode? Sludge
Magazine, January-February 1979. pp. 22-26.
X-8
-------
Ryckman/Edgerley/Tomlinson and Associates, Inc.
Treatability and Functional Design of a
Physical-Chemical Wastewater Treatment System for
Printing and Photodeveloping Plant. Presented at the
31st Annual Purdue Industrial Wastewater Conference,
West Lafayette, Indiana, May 1976. 23 pp.
Shemesh, Alvin and Norman Ackerman. Medical Hazards of
Photography. Industrial Medicine and Surgery,
33:807-812, 1964.
Sittig, Marshall. Pollutant Removal Handbook. Noyes Data
Corporation, Park Ridge, New Jersey, 1973. pp. 155-163,
462-465.
Supplement B: Volumes I, II and III. Guardian, Berkey and
Kodak Data, Effluent Limitations Guidelines and
Miscellaneous data and references. 1974.
Supplement B: Volume IV, Parts 1 and 2. Industry Survey
Data. 1974.
Supplement B: Volume V, Parts 1 and 2. References. 1974.
Supplement B: Volume VI, Parts 1 and 2. NPDES permits and
applications. Additional discharge permits and
applications. 1974.
Supplement B: Volumes VII and VIII. NAPM, Environmental
Effect of Photoprocessing Chemicals, Volumes I and II,
Harrison, New York, 1974.
U.S. Air Force. Recovery of Silver from Expended
Photographic Material. No. F42600-73-D-1463. May 1972.
U.S. Department of Commerce. 1972 Census of Selected
Service Industries. August 1975, September 1975,
December 1975.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Pretreatment
Standards for Ammonia, Phenols and Cyanides. March
1976. 142 pp.
X-9
-------
Waste Treatment. EPA 625/3-73-002, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Technology Transfer Seminar
Publication, July 1973. 47 pp.
West, Lloyd E. Water Quality Criteria. Photographic
Science and Engineering, 9(6):398-413, 1965.
Westin, R. F. Development Document for Interim Final
Effluent Limitations, Guidelines and Proposed New Source
Performance Standards for the Photographic Processing
Subcategory. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, D.C., June 1976.
Wolfman, Lydia. 1975-1976 Wolfman Report on the
Photographic Industry in the United States. ABC Leisure
Magazines, Inc., New York, New York, 1976. 96 pp.
A Zero Discharge Wastewater Treatment System. Environmental
Science and Technology, 12(9):1004-1006, 1978.
X-10
-------
SECTION XI
GLOSSARY
aeration: The addition of air to a liquid. This is done by
pumping the liquid into the air or by bubbling air
through it via sparging tubes. Aeration is used as part
of the ferric EDTA bleach regeneration process in
photographic processing. It can be used for reduction
of oxygen demand in wastewater.
acid rinse: A solution, usually dilute acetic acid, used as
a stop bath following development.
anion: The ion in an electrolyte which carries the negative
charge and migrates toward the anode under the influence
of a potential difference.
automatic wash water controls: Automatic solenoid operated
shutoff devices which completely stop the flow of water
into the processor when it is not being used, thereby
avoiding excessive wash water flows.
biochemical oxygen demand (BODS): A measurement of the
amount of dissolved oxygen an effluent will consume from
water over a five-day period of time.
biodegradable: A substance capable of being broken
organisms into simpler entities.
down by
black and white film: This film consists of a support,
usually a plastic film which is coated with a light
sensitive emulsion and an outer protective layer. The
emulsion is adhered to the supporting base with a
special layer called a sub. The emulsion contains:
gelatin, silver salts of bromide, iodide, chloride,
sensitizers, hardeners, and emulsion plasticizers.
bleach-fix or blix: A solution used in some color processing
that functions both as a bleach and as a fix.
bleach: A step in color film processing whereby the silver
image is converted back to silver halides.
XI-1
-------
cation: The ion in an electrolyte which carries the positive
charge and which migrates toward the cathode under the
influence of a potential difference.
chelating agents: A class of chemical compounds that can
form complex chemical species. Some of the compounds
are used as bleaching agents when complexed with ferric
ions and as sequestering agents in the isolation and
removal of metallic ions.
chemical oxygen demand (COD): An analytical method for
measuring the oxygen demand of an effluent. This method
is faster than the BOD5 test and responsive to a broader
range of components.
chemical prewash: A salt bath between the fix and final wash
which chemically removes the fix from the emulsion at a
faster rate than can be done by washing, thereby
reducing the after-fix wash water time and volume.
chlorination: The addition of chlorine to wastewater to
cause breakdown of certain compounds by oxidation.
chromium: A metallic element whose compounds are used in
some photographic processes as bleaching or hardenino
agents. *
clarification: The process of
suspended solids by settling.
removing turbidity and
clearing bath: A processing solution that removes most
residual fixer from processed film or paper prior to
washing, minimizing the water requirement.
color couplers: A group of organic chemicals which react
with the oxidized components of the developers to form
color dyes. They are either incorporated in the film
emulsion at the time of manufacture or they are included
in the color developing solution.
color film: Color film has three separate light sensitive
emulsion layers, which after inclusion of the
appropriate sensitizing dyes, record an image of the
blue light components on one layer, the green light
XI-2
-------
components on another, and the red light components on
the third layer.
film process
added during
color reversal (DC) process: A color reversal
in which the color couplers are
development.
rolor reversal (1C) process: A color reversal film and paper
procels in ihlch the color couplers which form the color
dye image are incorporated into the emulsion layers at
the time of manufacture.
complex
cyanide: This term refers to a complex ion
conservation: Methods applied to make maximum use of
processing chemicals and water and to keep the quantity
of effluent discharged to a minimum.
•ssrs .
. •ssEsms-ss. -;•«.«„
starting end of the material to be processed
to a leader which guides the material through
machine.
the
conventional silver recovery: The use of metallic
replacement or electrolytic methods or both for the
recovery of silver from fix solutions.
countercurrent washing: A method of washing film or paper
uling a segmented tank system in which water is cascaded
progressively from one tank segment to the next counter
to the movement of the film or paper.
develop: A step in photoprocessing whereby the latent image
is made visible in a developer solution.
developer : A chemical processing solution chaining a
developing agent. This solution converts the exposed
portions of the photographic emulsion to silver,
creating images of metallic silver.
XI-3
-------
agents: *hese Photographic materials usually are
groups
other,
(metol),
dlChreverLl1an^^t "f??h USed in some black an<* white
reversal and color film processing.
ip and dunk: An automatic processing machine whereby strips
tanks and he!d for^hfapproprfatftfrne6 photoProcessin9
direthedi^tedg^ateI.diSCharge °f ^—ter to waters of
o S°'idS: Solid matter ^ effluent that will not
settle out or separate with filtration.
fh
the
°r solu"on carried into another solution by
or paper being processed. unun Dy
drag-out: Water or solution carried out of the orocessina
tank by the film or paper being processed. Processing
- steP which involves drying the
ic film or paper in a dust-free atmosphere.
""idi-d
EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid): A chelatinq
e-bleafll and ble^h-fix solutions9
hard Sa^r. ^^^ *° S^St^
effluent: Liquid waste leaving its source.
electrolytic silver recovery: The removal of silver from
silver-bearing solutions by application of a direct
current to electrodes in Resolution causing metalnc
silver to deposit on the cathode. 9 metallic
elution: (l) The process of washing out, or removino with
the use of a solvent. (2) In an ion exchangfprocLs it
XI-4
-------
as
the stripping of adsorbed ions an.ion
equaHzation: The collection of waste.ater in^ta^ or^onds
other treatment steps.
waste containing the
•II
ferricyanide: This.ion, usually
ferricyanide, is used as a
Sanfde S ^u^iTf^o
in the film emulsions.
ferricyanide bleach: A processing solution
^ is removed in the
form of potassium
« metallic
processes.. Eerri-
as !t oxidi.es sUver
step.
"'1SSS.S
ssr.
sodium thiosulfate.
flocculation: The addition
ferric chloride or
of
-h
thereby increasing
gas-burst agitation: This is the
automatic agitation £°""°pdinat controlled intervals
machines. Gas is rel eased at cont ^ ^
through tiny holes in a distribute p ^^ during
feleasl pfovfde^the'rfndo, agitation pattern necessary
for uniform results.
XI-5
-------
allow for
hardfhnaT
film from damage during or
hardeners are potassium
chromium
tO
i0n:charS°m °r 9r°UP °f at°ms Possessing
protect the
Pro?ssi
-------
navigable waters: See waters of the United States.
negative process: A process which yields a negative image on
film or paper of the original subject.
.
process water as it does not come in contact with raw
materials or the product.
POTW: Publicly owned treatment works (45 FR 33423).
NPDES: See National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System.
on-site treatment: Treatment of effluent Performed at its
source, prior to discharge into a sewage system or a
receiving body of water.
involved
the
treatment, oxidation usually is
breakdown of many substances.
The process of using ozone (03) as an oxidizing
aen to oxidize and degrade chemical constituents in an
effluent or to regenerate ferricyanide bleach.
ozone: A powerful gaseous oxidizing agent (03); it can be
generated by a high voltage discharge across a stream of
air or oxygen.
persulfate: A strong oxidizing agent used to regenerate
ferrocyanide to ferricyanide in bleaches.
PH: A numerical value describing the acidity {low pH number)
and alkalinity (high pH number) of a solution.
polyelectrolytes: Synthetic chemicals
speed the removal of solids from wastewater by
suspended particles to coagulate. They can be anionic
XI-7
-------
[- charge,
charge) ].
nonionic
(+ and - charge) or cationic (+
pri.,r, tr.,t..nt, Th. r..»v,l of ..t.rl.l th.t floats „
machines, and in ar4a washdown
processing slutbeing reclaed
»f by-p.oducts
C°mp°nents °f
XI-8
-------
settling: The concentration of participate matter in
wastewater by allowing suspended solids to sink to the
bottom.
which
short stop: A step in photoprocessing
whereby the basic activators in
neutralized to prevent further
development
developer are
development.
follows
the
silver halide: Silver halide is an inorganic salt of silver
in combination with elements from Group ™ of the
Periodic Table. Silver halide salts used in photography
are silver chloride, silver bromide, and silver iodide.
Upon exposure to light, silver halide crystals undergo
an internal change making them capable of subsequent
reduction to metallic silver by appropriate developing
agents.
silver recovery: Removal of silver from used photographic
processing solutions and materials so it can be made
available for reuse.
spray washing: A method of washing film or paper using a
spray rather than an immersion tank as a means of
conserving water.
stabilizer: A chemical bath, usually the last in a
processing cycle, that imparts greater life to a
processed photographic film or paper through one of
several preserving steps.
saueeaee: A piece of flexible material or a thin stream of
squeegee. A p Qn Qne or both sides of photographic
film or paper as it comes out of a tank of processing
solution. This reduces the amount of solution carried
over.
surface water: See waters of the United States.
suspended solids: Undissolved matter carried in effluent
that may settle out in a clarifier.
total organic carbon (TOO: A measure of the amount of
carbon in a sample originating from organic matter. Tne
XI-9
-------
test is run by burning the
carbon dioxide produced.
sample and measuring the
wash: A water wash is a step in photoprocessing removing
residual processing chemicals absorbed in the emulsion
or substrate.
waters of the United States: All waters which are currently
used, used in the past, or may be used, for interstate
or foreign commerce, including all waters subject to ebb
and flow of the tide. Also includes intrastate lakes
rivers, streams, mud flats, and wetlands (44 FR 33300,
"^T -T *X W O TT rf£ *f ) *
^ ?ischar9e: A goal for 1985 as set by the Federal Water
Pollution Act of 1972. This means that the discharge of
pollutants intojthe navigable waters will be eliminated
by 1985. &
XI-10
-------
APPENDIX A
TELEPHONE CONTACT SURVEY MEMO
A-l
-------
17 January 1977
Versar Inc., EPA Contract No. 68-01-3273
FILE MEMO - TELEPHONE CONTACT - PHOTO PROCESSING
Versar Engineer
Time
Person Contacted:
Name
Goirpany
Phone
A. Process
1. What types of processes are used?
(a) black and white: negative process
reversal process
Date
File No.
Title
Address: Street
still filnft
State
Zip Code
movie%
papers
(b) color: negative process
reversal (couplers in emulsion)
reversal (couplers in developer)
(c) Other:
explain ___^
2. Are machine processes used?
For which processes?
Yes
No
Partially
3. Is replenishment used? Yes
Which processes?
Partially Continuous Batch
No
Partially
4. Are chemical recovery and recycle methods used? Yes
(a) Silver recovery - Yes No Metallic Electro- Off- Rscycle Discharge
Tteplacement lytic
From: Fix
bleach-fix
washvster
site
(b) Bleach regeneration: Yes
Ferricyanide: Method
Processes used
No
Partially
Ferric EDTA: Method
Processes used
Other:
A-2
-------
(c) Other (such as cooler, developer, etc.
Processes used
Not used
5. Use of squeegees: Everywhere recommended Partial use _
6. Estimated Process Water Usage: less than 1,000 gpd ; 1,000 to 9,999 gpd
10,000 to 99,999 gpd ; more than 100,000 gpd .
7.
Estimated production: less than 1,000 sq. ft./day
day ; 3,000 sq. ft./day to 20,000 sq. ft./day _
more than 20,000 sq. ft./day .
; 1,000 to 2,999 sq. ft./
B. Wastewater
1. Other than recovery or recycle, is process wastewater treated before
discharge? Yes No
(a) If yes, how?
(b) Does the treated stream contain all the process wastewater? Yes
(c) Does the treated stream contain any non-process wastewater?
Sanitary Non-contact cooling Boiler Other
2. Where are the wastewater streams discharged?
Contains
Stream 001 _
Stream 002
Stream 003
Discharged to
3.
Do you have a discharge permit for any stream?
Stream(s)
state
Corp.Eng.Appl,
Number
NPDES
Other (POTW)
What parameters are limited?
No
A-3
-------
4. Is analytical data available and for what period of tine?
N° Yes Period
5. Are sewer user charges employed by local monicipality? If so, what are
charges and basis (flow, pollutant, etc.)
C. General
1. Conmsnts:
2. Pfould the plant be agreeable to an engineering visit by an H>A Representative?
Who should be contacted
3. What type of customer or service provided?
(a) Amateur
(b) Professional
(c) Commercial (Art, printing, etc.)
(d) Conrnercial (Movie, T.V.)
(e) Studio (portrait, school)
(f) Other
4. Are toners used?
If so what type
A-4
-------
APPENDIX B
LONG-TERM PLANT EFFLUENT DATA
B-l
-------
LONG-TERM DATA FOR PLANT 6208
KEY: AG79
CN79
CR79
Effluent Silver Concentration, mg/liter,
mid-1974 to July 1979
Effluent Total Cyanide Concentration, mg/liter,
mid-1974 to July 1979
Effluent Total Chromium Concentration, mg/liter,
mid-1974 to July 1979
LIS .ZAISSE
AG79
0.39
1.4
0.22
0.01
0,38
0.14
0.32
1.4
0.25
0.317
0.43
0.94
0,68
0.52
0.7
0,23
0.48
0.5
0,93
0.21
0.88
0.16
1.2
0.2
0.15
0.17
0.9
0.19
0.08
0,16
0.27
0,05
1.22
0.13
0.53
0.16
0.59
0.57
0.32
0.32
0.33
0.17
0.34
0.86
0.032
0.17
0.2
0.31
1.2
0.139
0.54
0.92
0.5
1,2
0.2
0.22
0.14
CN 79
0.005
0.005
0.005
0,14
0.08
0,01
0,005
0,005
67.4*
u.ul
1.12
0.01
0.005
O.OOS
0.06
0*26
0.01
0.01
0.008
O.OOS
0.005
0,14
0,57
0.01
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.21
0.01
0.01
0.005
0.005
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.029
0.005
0.005
0.032
0.04
0.01
0,005
0,005
1.8
0.104
0.01
0.006
0.005
0.01
1,75
0.01
0.005
0.005
0.28
0.04
0.08
CR 79
3.09
3,0
8.1
1,76
1.1
2.6
4.73
2.7
4.4
4.55
2.6
5.0
3.11
1.84
4.2
0,6
4.1
2.1
5.93
2.8
3.31
0.24
3.4
4.3
3.56
2.91
6.4
0.35
0.8
2.8
4.59
4.38
3.06
2.92
3.7
4,7
4.11
5.9
8.2
1.25
6.6
2.3
3.6
4.8
0.46
3.82
2.3
2.4
4.4
1.82
5.0
6.2
0.2
5.4
1.0
2.0
3.1
* Value not used.
B-2
-------
LONG-TEEM DATA FOR PLANT 7781
KEY: AG577: Effluent Silver Concentration, mg/liter,
1 February to 29 April 1977
AG877: Effluent Silver Concentration, mg/liter,
5 July to 1 August 1977
CD577: Effluent Cadmium Concentration, mg/liter,
1 February to 29 April 1977
CD877: Effluent Cadmium Concentration, mg/liter,
5 July to 1 August 1977
AG677
6,31
7*50
5.76
5,60
11,66
AG 877
8.72
5.23
CD 577
0,57
0.88
0,94
3.14
0.71
0.56
0,29
CD 877
0,18
0.2
5.10
8.10
8,46
8*00
10,34
4,93
3.75
0.8
0.72
0*98
4*0
0.63
1.12
0.35
0,19
0.15
5.27
4.44
7.46
2.85
7.18
3.12
0.9
2.0
1.24
3.69
0*97
1.0
0.31
0.24
~Q?12
9.75
3.28
3*03
6.10
4.69
1.52
0.7
0,95
1,52
1.82
0.51
0,5
0,19
0*18
0.04
4.64
2.33
4.34
9.27
3.62
1.53
0.08
1.18
2*23
2.6
0,82
0,33
0.1
0*04
8.64
-4.46
2.72
15.10
3*61
2.11
0*21
1.6
1.85
2.78
1*0
0.57
0.09
0,04
13.12
2.36
1.40
14.68
3.43
1.98
0.33
1.47
1.64
2.5
1.12
0.54
0.09
0.05
7.93
3.15
1.97
5.78
3.05
1.52
0,48
1.57
1.84
1.84
1.0
0.5
0.11
0.06
7.26
4.33
2.46
4.23
9.01
1.41
0.66
0.8
2.22
0.88
0.25
0.41
0.17
0,02
7.94
3.70
6.20
2,91
8.01
1.23
0*52
0.64
3.55
0*85
0.25
0.26
0.22
0.05
B-3
-U S GOVEOHEHT PRIHTIIB OFFICE: 1981 3M-085/M5S
-------
-------
-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
WH 552
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use
$300
Fourth-Class Mai!
Postage and Fees Paid
EPA
Permit No. G-35
Washington DC 20460
-------