-------
M
>-
O
UJ
_j
O-
» »
eo «- l»- in r» eg ^
- s - M - - §
K> CM O O CO pJ
£i *~ S «-
g:
in
Ul
o
111 £ ui
isle
H- OS H- Ul
§ 5 § UJ
?
Ul (M
CUIOI-U:E*
UJ
UJ
_J
S
£.:S£5
A O > Ul O O
i 2 S S i S
K UJ » >
rxi o. CD O ae o.
84
-------
U)
_J
O.
in
CM
Ul
_J
^
v>
(M
>-
0
UJ
_l
^
^
O
UJ
O.
5
(O
^^
0)
s.
5
^
(7)
»^
5
K»
R
g
o^
rj
« to
UJ
.J
CO
U U.
i s
U t
g 2
S1
en
jrf
I
5
« -
O M >- S 3
S z z Zj cn
L> UJ H- O
< tn ui t- CM
g
i
O.
85
-------
TABLE A-18
ORGANICS RESULTS
FOR
FILTER CAKE SAMPLES
FACILITY A
SAMPLE DAY 1 SAMPLE DAY 2
(ug/kg) (ug/kg)
SAMPLE DAY 3
(ug/kg)
Votatiles
BENZENE
1,1,1-TRlCHLOROETHANE
ETHYLBENZENE
TETRACHLOROETHENE
TOLUENE
TR1CHLOROETHENE
2-BUTANONE (MEK)
P-D10XANE
4-METHYL-2-PENTANONE
35521
271473
8871
199001
812
2641
6777
2144
33620
2419
44529
2694
8827
Semi-VolatHes
2,4-DIHETHYLPHENOL
PHENOL
2-HETHYLNAPHTHALENE
1-HETHYLPHENANTHRENE
44501
16351
53176
25730
92285
1020354
211729
78023
280944
792536
917764
114143
86
-------
TABLE A-19
METALS RESULTS
FOR
FACILITY A - WATER SAMPLES
SAMPLE DAY 1
ICP Screening Metals
SAMPLE DAY 2
FINAL DUPLICATE
INFLUENT EFFLUENT EFFLUENT
Al
Sb
As
Ba
Be
Bi
B
Cd
Ca
Ce
Cr
Co
Cu
Dy
Er
Eu
Ga
Ge
Au
Hf
Ho
In
I
Ir
Fe
La
Li
Lu
Pb
Mg
Mn
Hg
Mo
Nd
Ni
Nb
Os
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
c-J»
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
87
-------
TABLE A-19 (Continued)
METALS RESULTS
FOR
FACILITY A - WATER SAMPLES
SAMPLE DAY 1
SAMPLE DAY 2
FINAL
IHFLUENT EFFLUENT
ICP Screening Metals
Pd
P
Pt
K
Pr
Re
Rh
Ru
Sro
Sc
Se
Si
Ag
Na
Sr
S
Ta
Te
Tb
Tl
Th
Tm
Sn
Tf
U
U
V
Yb
Y
Zn
Zr
ICP and AA Metals
Al
Sb
(Continued)
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
DET
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
DET -
ND
1800
340
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
- ND
NO
NO
ND
610
<10
FINAL DUPLICATE
INFLUENT EFFLUENT EFFLUENT
ND
DET
NO
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
2500
123
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
69
<10
ND
DET
ND
ND ,
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
51
<10
88
-------
TABLE A-19 (Continued)
METALS RESULTS
FOR
FACILITY A - WATER SAMPLES
SAMPLE DAY 1
FINAL
INFLUENT EFFLUENT
ICP and AA Metals (Continued)
As
Ba
Be
B
Cd
Ca
Cr
Co
Cu
Fe
Pb
Mg
Mn
Hg
Ho
Ni
Se
Ag
Na
Tl
Sn
Ti
V
Y
Zn
26
73
1
19000
9
130000
74
24
140
15000
280
36000
570
<0.2
1100
66
<5
<5
40
<1
5000
5
160000
<3
<4
13
360
<50
18000
150
<0.2
150
<12
<5
580000 150000
<65
50
6
5600
10
8
<10
34
SAMPLE DAY 2
FINAL DUPLICATE
INFLUENT EFFLUENT EFFLUENT
28
94
1
15000
10
140000
79
30
190
26000
470
26000
500
<0.2
410
68
<5
410000
<65
50
7
<5
48
<1
4100
<5
310000
<3
9
12
250
<50
19000
300
<0.2
33
<12
<5
150000
<65
50
6
<5
47
<1
4100
<5
310000
<3
8
8
220
<50
19000
300
<0.2
30
<12
<5
150000
<65
50
<2
4800
61
55
89
-------
TABLE A-20
METALS RESULTS
FOR
FACILITY B - WATER SAMPLES
SAMPLE DAY 1
SAMPLE DAY 2
ICP Screening Metals
Al
Sb
As
Ba
Be
B!
B
Cd
Ca
Ce
Cr
Co
Cu
Dy
Er
Eu
Ga
Ge
Au
Hf
Ho
In
1
Ir
Fe
La
Li
Lu
Pb
Hg
Hn
Hg
Ho
Nd
Hi
Nb
Os
Pd
INFLUENT
DET
NO
ND
ND
ND
NO
DET
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
FINAL
EFFLUENT
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
NO
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
FINAL DUPLICATE
INFLUENT EFFLUENT EFFLUENT
DET
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
OET
ND
ND
ND
NO
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
DET
HD
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
90
-------
TABLE A-20 (Continued)
HETALS RESULTS
FOR
FACILITY B - WATER SAMPLES
SAMPLE DAY 1
FINAL
INFLUENT EFFLUENT
ICP Screening Hetals (Continued)
SAMPLE DAY 2
FINAL DUPLICATE
INFLUENT EFFLUENT EFFLUENT
p
Pt
K
Pr
Re
Rh
Ru
Sm
Sc
Se
Si
Ag
Na
Sr
S
Ta
Te
Tb
Tl
Th
Tm
Sn
Ti
W
U
V
Yb
Y
Zn
Zr
ICP and AA Hetals
Al
Sb
As
Ba
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
1300
10
24
250
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
900
<10
24
89
DET ,
ND
DET
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
1300
10
15
140
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
1800
<10
25
170
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
NO
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
1300
14
27
160
91
-------
TABLE A-20 (Continued)
METALS RESULTS
FOR
FACILITY B WATER SAMPLES
SAMPLE DAY 1
ICP and AA Ketals
Be
B
Cd
Ca
Cr
Co
Cu
Fe
Pb
Kg
Hn
Kg
Ho
Hi
Se
A3
No
Tl
Sn
Ti
V
Y
Zn
INFLUENT
(Continued)
1.0
13000
<5.0
53000
1200
<4.0
40
6200
580
21000
360
<0.2
52
180
<5
<1
130000
<10
<13
22
7
<10
1400
FINAL
EFFLUENT
<1.0
7800
<5.0
57000
760
<4.0
21
9000
150
20000
270
<0.2
18
140
<25
<1
270000
<10
<13
22
<2.0
<10
830
SAMPLE DAY 2
FINAL DUPLICATI
INFLUENT EFFLUENT EFFLUENT
11000
<5.0
64000
1100
<4.0
73
5300
360
20000
350
<0.2
27
140
<25
100000
29
6
15000
<5.0
70000
1000
11
96
11000
530
22000
400
<0.2
41
160
<5
330000
31
10
14000
<5.0
73000
1100
8
94
12000
480
24000
380
<0.2
41
150
<5
380000
28
7.0
1100
1400
1300
92
-------
TABLE A-21
HETALS RESULTS
FOR
FACILITY C - WATER SAMPLES
SAMPLE DAY 1
ICP Screening Metals
Al
Sb
As
Ba
Be
Bi
B
Cd
Ca
Ce
Cr
Co
Cu
Dy
Er
Eu
Ga
Ge
Au
Hf
Ho
In
I
lr
Fe
La
Li
Lu
Pb
Hg
Hn
Kg
Ho
Nd
Ni
Nb
Os
Pd
INFLUENT f
DET
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
, ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
OET
ND
ND
DET
DET
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
DAF FILTER STRIPPER FINAL DUPLICATE
fFFLUENT EFFLUENT EFFLUENT EFFLUENT EFFLUENT
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
DET
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
DET
DET
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND,
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
DET
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
93
-------
TABLE A-21 (Continued)
METALS RESULTS
FOR
FACILITY C - WATER SAMPLES
SAMPLE DAY 1
INFLUENT
DAF FILTER STRIPPER FINAL DUPLICATE
EFFLUENT EFFLUENT EFFLUENT EFFLUENT EFFLUENT
ICP Screening Metals (Continued)
P
Pt
K
fr
Re
Rh
Ru
Sin
Sc
Se
Si
Ag
Na
Sr
S
Ja
Te
Tb
Tl
Th
Tra
Sn
Ti
U
U
V
Yb
Y
Zn
Zr
ICP and AA Hetals
Al
Sb
As
Ba
DET
NO
DET
NO
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
1320
<20
<20
311
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
NO
ND
DET
ND
13200
<20
<20
<100
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
W
ND
NO
DET
DET
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
8540
<20
<20
<100
DET
ND
DET
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
NO
ND
DET
ND
6400
<20
<20
<100
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
2860
<20
<20
<100
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
2290
<20
<20
<100
94
-------
TABLE A-21 (Continued)
METALS RESULTS
FOR
FACILITY C - WATER SAMPLES
SAMPLE DAY 1
ICP and AA Metals
Be
B
Cd
Ca
Cr
Co
Cu
Fe
Pb
Mg
Mn
Hg
Mo
Ni
Se
Ag
Na
Tl
Sn
Ti
V
Y
Zn
INFLUENT
(Continued)
<5
25800
<10
54100
<10
<50
883
1300
<100
54400
294
<0.4
139
40
<10
<1
2250000
<100
<100
<50
<50
<50
292
DAF
EFFLUENT
<5
23700
<10
34000
<10
<50
197
816
<100
49800
237
<0.4
118
<40
45
<1
2390000
<100
<100
<50
<50
<50
56
FILTER
EFFLUENT
<5
22500
<10
32400
<10
<50
<25
615
<100
49600
227
<0.4
126
47
90
<1
2560000
<100
<100
<50
<50
<50
50
STRIPPER
EFFLUENT
<5
23700
<10
32300
<10
<50
78
535
104
49500
230
<0.4
135
43
<10
<1
2640000
<100
<100
<50
<50
<50
49
FINAL
EFFLUENT
<5
23000
<10
18700
<10
<50
35
323
126
43800
189
<0.2
123
<40
57
<1
2650000
<100
<100
<50
<50
<50
27
DUPLICATE
EFFLUENT
<5
23700
<10
19800
<10
<50
79
408
<100
45300
192
<0.2
135
<40
<10
<1
2580000
<100
<100
<50
<50
<50
36
95
-------
TABLE A-21 (Continued)
METALS RESULTS
FOR
FACILITY C - WATER SAMPLES
SAMPLE DAY 2
ICP Screening Metals
Al
Sb
As
Ba
Be
Bi
B
Cd
Ca
Ce
Cr
Co
Cu
Dy
Er
Eu
Ga
Ge
Au
Hf
Ho
In
1
Ir
Fe
La
Li
Lu
Pb
Kg
Hn
Hg
Ho
Hd
Hi
Mb
Os
Pd
DAF FILTER STRIPPER FINAL DUPLICATE
NFLUENT EFFLUENT EFFLUENT EFFLUENT EFFLUENT EFFLUENT
DET
ND
NO
DET
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
NO
ND
OET
DET
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
DET
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
DET
DET
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
DET
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
' ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
DET
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
DET
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
96
-------
TABLE A-21 (Continued)
METALS RESULTS
FOR
FACILITY C - WATER SAMPLES
SAMPLE DAY
DAF FILTER STRIPPER FINAL DUPLICATE
INFLUENT EFFLUENT EFFLUENT EFFLUENT EFFLUENT EFFLUENT
ICP Screening Metals (Continued)
P
Pt
K
Pr
Re
Rh
Ru
Sm
Sc
Se
Si
Ag
Na
Sr
S
Ta
Te
Tb
Tt
Th '
Tm
Sn
Ti
U
U
V
Yb
Y
Zn
Zr
ICP and AA Metals
Al
Sb
As
Ba
DET
NO
DET
NO
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
639
<20
<20
250
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
15300
<20
<20
<100
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
DET
DET
NO
NO
ND
ND
DET
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
21300
<20
<20
<100,
DET
ND
DET
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
10700
<20
<20
<100
DET
ND
DET
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
7260
<20
<20
<100
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
NO '
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
7460
<200
<20
281
97
-------
TABLE A-21 (Continued)
HETALS RESULTS
FOR
FACILITY C - WATER SAMPLES
SAMPLE DAY 2
DAF FILTER STRIPPER FINAL DUPLICATE
INFLUENT EFFLUENT EFFLUENT EFFLUENT EFFLUENT EFFLUENT
ICP and AA Metals (Continued)
Be
B
Cd
Ca
Cr
Co
Cu
Fe
Pb
Hg
Kn
Kg
Ho
Hi
Se
Ag
Na
71
Sn
T5
V
Y
Zn
<5
28100
<5
28000
<5
27700
<5
26700
<5
23700
<5
25000
43600 27900 29900 26600 15500 15400
<50
155
1340
<100
65400
284
<0.4
174
69
<10
<2
3300000
<100
<100
<50
<50
<50
143
<50
83
749
<100
60800
250
<0.4
152
<40
143
<2
3580000
<100
<100
<50
<50
<50
85
<50
53
1110
<100
63400
268
<0.4
146
48
<10
<1
3700000
<100
<100
<50
<50
<50
63
<50
40
570
<100
58700
264
<0.4
123
<40
59
<2
3720000
<100
<100
<50
<50
<50
34
<50
32
419
<100
48000
268
<0.2
157
<40
325
<2
3740000
«100
«100
<50
<50
<50
25
<50
<25
428
<100
47700
270
<0.2
170
<40
358
<2
3760000
<200
<100
<50
<50
<50
27
98
-------
TABLE A-22
METALS RESULTS
FOR
FACILITY D WATER SAMPLES
SAMPLE DAY 1
FINAL
EFFLUENT
SCRUBBER
EFFLUENT
ICP Screening Metals
Al
Sb
As
Ba
Be
Bi
B
Cd
Ca
Ce
Cr
Co
Cu
Dy
Er
Eu
Ga
Ge
Au
Hf
Ho
In
I
Ir
Fe
La
Li
Lu
Pb
Mg
Mn
Hg
Mo
Nd
Hi
Nb
Os
Pd
DET
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND ,
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
99
-------
TABLE A-22 (Continued)
METALS RESULTS
FOR
FACILITY D - WATER SAMPLES
SAMPLE DAY 1
FINAL
EFFLUENT
SCRUBBER
EFFLUENT
ICP Screening Metals (Continued)
P
Pt
K
Pr
Re
Rh
Ru
Sm
Sc
Se
Si
Ag
Na
Sr
S
Ta
Te
Tb
Tl
Th
Tm
Sn
Ti
W
U
V
Yb
Y
Zn
Zr
DET
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DEf
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
DET
NO
ICP and AA Metals
Al
Sb
As
Ba
<200
<60
<10
<100
208
<60
<10
000
100
-------
TABLE A-22 (Continued)
METALS RESULTS
FOR
FACILHY D - WATER SAMPLES
SAMPLE DAY 1
FINAL
EFFLUENT
SCRUBBER
EFFLUENT
JCP and AA Metals (Continued)
Be
B
Cd
Ca
Cr
Co
Cu
Fe
Pb
Mg
Mn
Hg
Mo
Ni
Se
Ag
Na
Tl
Sn
Ti
V
Y
Zn
<5
30000
9
<5000
13
<50
<25
16400
.<200
<5000
318
<1.0
<100
<21
<25
<10
542000
<100
<40
<50
<50
<50
248000
<5
684
<5
27600
53
<50
<25
1520
332
8470
33
<1.0
<100
<40
<25
<10
1020000
<50
<40
<50
<50
<50
240
101
-------
TABLE A-23
HETALS RESULTS
FOR
OAF SLUDGE SAMPLES
FACILITY B
1CP Screening Metals
Al
Sb
As
Ba
Be
Bi
B
Cd
Ca
Ce
Cr
Co
Cu
Oy
Er
Eu
Ga
Ge
Au
Hf
Ho
In
I
Ir
Fe
La
Li
Lu
Pb
Hg
Hn
Hg
Ho
Hd
Hi
Nb
Os
Pd
P
SAMPLE DAY 1
DET
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
DET
DET
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
SAMPLE DAY 2
DET
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
DET
DET
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
FACILITY C
SAMPLE DAY 1
DET
ND
ND
DET
ND
HD
DET
DET
DET
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
HD
HD
ND
HD
HD
HD
^ NO
~~ HD
HD
HD
DET
HD
HD
HD
DET
DET
DET
DET
ND
HD
ND
ND
ND
UD
DET
SAMPLE DAY 2
DET
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
SAMPLE DAY 3
DET
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
,DET
DET
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
102
-------
TABLE A-23 (Continued)
METALS RESULTS
FOR
DAF SLUDGE SAMPLES
FACILITY B
FACILITY C
SAMPLE DAY 1 SAHPLE DAY 2
1CP Screening Metals (Continued)
Pt
K
Pr
Re
Rh
Ru
Sm
Sc
Se
Si
Ag
Na
Sr
S
Ta
Te
Tb
Tl
Th
Tm
Sn
Ti
W
u
V
Yb
Y
Zn
Zr
ICP and AA Metals
Al
Sb
As
Ba
Be
NO
NO
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
OET
ND
1270
<16
<8.0
326
<0'.6
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
OET
DET
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
OET
ND
937
<2.0
<6.0
398
<0.6
SAMPLE DAY 1
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
DET
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
OET
ND
ND
DET
ND
121000
<22
<22
225
<4
SAMPLE DAY 2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
1670
<1.2
<1.2
62.1
<0.3
SAMPLE DAY 3
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
NO
DET
ND
DET
DET
OET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
OET.
ND
151000
<20
<20
254
<6
103
-------
TABLE A-23 (Continued)
METALS RESULTS
FOR
DAF SLUDGE SAMPLES
FACILITY B
SAMPLE DAY 1 SAMPLE DAY 2
1CP and AA Metals (Continued)
Cd
Ca
Cr
Co
Cu
Fe
Pb
Kg
Hn
Hg
Ho
Hi
Se
Ag
Na
Tt
Sn
Tf
V
Y
Zn
246
10
19700
2060
20
211
15100
297
2280
162
2
72
24
<2.0
3
576
<2.0
<13
11
<6
<6
1900
311
8
14900
1560
15
162
11400
1790
1760
1030
1
48
152
<2.0
2
1180
<2.0
16
63
<4
<4
1440
FACILITY C
SAMPLE DAY 1
1490
42
24200
225
<36
881
5080
116
13500
78.3
2.12
<72
<29
<11
<1.1
82100
<11
<72
116
93.9
<36
157
SAMPLE DAY 2
43.2
0.8
384
3.2
<3.2
<1.6
38.0
<6.4
250
1.2
0.32
<6.4
<2.6
<0.6
<0.06
6110
<0.6
<6.4
<3.2
<3.2
<3.2
<1.3
SAMPLE DAY 3
1590
49
23500
216
<57
<28
3320
333
5220
48.8
<1.2
<114
<45
<10
<1.0
66400
<10
253
128
98.7
<57
81
104
-------
TABLE A-24
METALS RESULTS
FOR
SPENT CLAY SAMPLES
FACILITY A
SAMPLE
1CP Screening Metals
Al
Sb
As
Ba
Be
Bi
B
Cd
Ca
Ce
Cr
Co
Cu
Dy
Er
Eu
Ga
Ge
Au
Hf
Ho
In
I
Ir
Fe
La
Li
Lu
Pb
Hg
. Hn
Hg
Mo
Nd
Ni
Nb
Os
Pd
P
DAY 1
DET
ND
ND
DET
DET
NO
DET
DET
DET
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
SAMPLE DAY 2
DET
ND
ND
DET
DET
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
SAMPLE DAY 3
DET
ND
ND
DET
DET
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
FACILITY B
SAMPLE DAY 1
DET
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
ND
DET
ND
DET
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
SAMPLE DAY 2
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
DET .
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
105
-------
TABLE A-24 (Continued)
METALS RESULTS
FOR
SPENT CLAY SAMPLES
FACILITY A
FACILITY B
<
ICP Screening Metals
Pt
K
Pr
Re
Rh
Ru
Sm
Sc
Se
Si
Ag
Ha
Sr
S
Ta
Te
Tb
Tl
Th
Tra
Sn
Ti
U
U
V
Yb
Y
Zn
2r
ICP and AA Metals
«*
Al
Sb
As
Ba
Be
B
SAMPLE DAY 1
(Continued)
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
DET
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
DET
ND
11900
<9.0
<9.0
778
18
150
SAMPLE DAY 2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
DET
ND
12800
<50
<10
775
17
138
SAMPLE DAY 3
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
DET
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
DET
ND
13400
<1.0
<9.0
794
18
149
SAMPLE DAY 1
MD
NO
ND
NO
ND
NO
ND
NO
ND
DET
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
ND
1730
<39
<8.0
432
<0.6
<5
SAMPLE DAY 2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
ND
1610
<5.0
<9.0
<4
<0.6
<4
106
-------
TABLE A-24 (Continued)
METALS RESULTS
FOR
SPENT CLAY SAMPLES
FACILITY A
SAMPLE DAY 1 SAMPLE DAY 2 SAMPLE DAY 3
ICP and AA Metals (Continued)
Cd
Ca
Cr
Co
Cu
Fe
Pb
Hg
Mn
Hg
Mo
Ni
Se
Ag
Na
Tt
Sn
Ti
V
Y
Zn
92
10700
746
3
5
6620
355
12900
4420
<5
138
4750
85
11800
38
6
7000
26
13500
229
<6
7
5690
89
12900
693
3
5
7150
330
13600
4580
<6
137
4380
5
1900
617
15
955
<6
93
31
16
71
101
1760
580
17
1120
FACILITY B
SAMPLE DAY 1
2
6800
3
<3
35
1870
25
1290
107
<0.1
<5
2
87
5
104
<3
5
473
SAMPLE DAY 2
1
5570
<2
<2
7
1450
28
19060
74
0
<4
2
86
4
105
<2
5
66
107
-------
TABLE A-25
METALS RESULTS
FOR
SPENT CARBON SAMPLES
FACILITY C
SAMPLE
ICP Screening Metals
Al
Sb
As
Ba
Be
Bi
B
Cd
Ca
Ce
Cr
Co
Cu
Dy
Er
Eu
Ga
Ge
Au
Hf
Ho
In
I
Ir
Fe
La
Li
Lu
Pb
Hg
Mn
Kg
Mo
Nd
Hi
Nb
Os
Pd
P
DAY 1
DET
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
SAMPLE DAY 2
DET
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
108
SAMPLE DAY 3
DET
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
-------
TABLE A-25 (Continued)
METALS RESULTS
FOR
SPENT CARBON SAMPLES
FACILITY C
SAMPLE DAY 1
ICP Screening Metals
Pt
K
Pr
Re
Rh
Ru
Sm
Sc
Se
Si
Ag
Na
Sr
S
Ta
Te
Tb
Tl
Th
Tra
Sn
Ti
U
U
V
Yb
Y
2n
Zr
ICP and AA Metals
Al
Sb
As
Ba
(Continued)
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
DET
ND
1700
<0.7
<0.7
U.O
SAMPLE DAY 2
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
1070
<1.0
<1.0
7.63
SAMPLE DAY 3
ND
DET
ND
NO
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
NO
DET
DET
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
DET
NO
1590
<1.1
<1.1
8.69
109
-------
TABLE A-25 (Continued)
METALS RESULTS
FOR
SPENT CARBON SAMPLES
FACILITY C
SAMPLE DAY.1 SAMPLE DAY 2 SAMPLE DAY 3
ICP and AA Hetals (Continued)
Be
B
Cd
Ca
Cr
Co
Cu
Fe
Pb
Hg
Hn
Kg
Ho
Ni
Se
Ag
Na
Tl
Sn
Ti
V
Y
Zn
<0.2
27.9
1.1
1660
3.2
<2.4
14.8
1620
<4.8
863
19.2
<0.06
<4.8
2.4
<0.4
<0.04
4610
<0.4
<4.8
71.6
3.3
<2.4
4.3
<0.3
31.5
0.7
1660
3.4
<2.6
15.9
821
6.89
1200
17.8
<0.06
<5.3
<2.1
<0.5
<0.05
3790
<0.5
<5.3
42.2
<2.6
<2.7
4.6
<0.2
42.1
0.9
1880
3.5
2.1
16.6
1040
<4.3
1330
20.8
<0.06
<4.3
1.9
<0.6
«0.06
3940
<0.6
6.49
35.3
2.7
<2.2
3.9
110
-------
CM
o
l-Oat OOt-h-l Oh-Ot-OOOOOOOOOt-Ot-OOOt t-
UJZZUJZZUJLLJIUZUJZUJZZZZZZZZZUJZUJZZZliJUJ
O O O O O O O O O O O
UJ
_J
c.
t-QOt-OOt-l-l-OH-OI-OOOOOO
UJZZUJZZUJUJUJZUJZUIZZZZZZ
o o o o o o o
i
*-OO»-OO*-^-H- OK- O I- O O
luatseujzziJJLUUJaeujaeujzz
o o o o o o o
z i s &
UJ
_J
o.
>-»-ni OOI-»-»-O»-O»-OOOOOO
UJLUZUIZZUJIIJUJZLUZUJZZZZZZ
oo o ooo o o
O t- O O O I- t-
z iu z z z at LU
a o o
(M
>-
«t
o
s ^
_J >-
Ul
S!
H-Ofr-^-OO^-^-^-OI O» O
tUZUJLUZZUILUUlZUJZLUZ
o oo ooo o o
o
o o o o o
g
«
a
s
81
J>
^ _i a. x-
in
-------
5 LU
** 3E
I 3
vJ CO CO
i B» t
» 3gB
2 1 |
CO
0
*
0
X-
ft
u
u.
u
ft
_J
i
CO
fc-
!Ij
CJ
u.
:
_
c
2
o
111
0.
v>
-Oft-O Oft-OOOOOOOOOO
UJZUIZUJZ ZUJZZZZZZZZZZ
000 0
o
z
$ ft O ft O O O Oft OOOOOOOOOO
5 UJZIUZZZ ZUJZZZZZZZZZZ
c o
1
^^
09
a
8)
X
g
u
OT e o> o T3 ~- ja -o *< «. si j: 3 6 o «j -
a. £ = a:zzz o.o.o.wa.a:o:aecoco(nv>
Oft-ft-ft-OOOOOOti-
ZIUUIUJZZZZZZUJ
o o o o
Oft-ft-ft-OOOOOO)-
ziuuiujzzzzsezuj
o o o o
UJIUUIUIZZZZZZUJ
0 0 0 O 0
ft ft Oft OOOOOOft-
UJUJZUJZZZZZZUJ
o o o o
ft ft Oft OOOOOOO
UJUJZUIZZZZZZZ
o o o
ft-ft-oi ooooaoft-
muizujzzzzzziii
o o o o
g»-oft-oooaooo
UIZU1ZZZZZZZ
o o
. .
CftcgL. ^^^'^^JlM
112
-------
o
| gj
§ 1
CJ
^ co en
*O i O
CM 3 1
I V> t-
< UJ O
oe c£ m
UJ O
S 2 " g
" s 5
o
o
1
u
u.
CJ
1
_J
CJ
u-
co
Zj
t
CM
O
UJ
1
CO
-
o
UJ
i
a.
i
|
UJ
_J
ex
z
-
«t
UJ
-J
c/>
CM
UJ
1
a.
i
UJ
a.
i
s
>
OQOOQOf Q f»» IA ^ «"«"
ZZZZZZLUZ sQ V V O V
O «r»
ggggggfcg K -C °. &: V
o ^
V
uizzuizzujz e> cc. x> v> a d
>->-FM(M o.
* * * CM P-
^ *O O f^ O K» \f\
M »*sO^ «On»
** ^T K» CM K.
M V
«- O O » v v in
CM «- 0 M CM f^ r^
»- O V CM XJ
* »- CM
CM
CM «- o ro ro NO h-
a v fc v v fc
CM
SCO C. O 3 CU
O U CJ CJ u.
M O CM »- ^ O
o in o rJ
O- o CM - in ^
o in o h*
^- v
Q ^. . f* ^f
V
>» {O CM >» CO h-
m ^- o
M * (O O «-
»- o «- v
in « ro v v
v
^O in o « in *-
CM ^ .
« O. o
in v
O> o «- »- «o CM
«- CM CM V
O SO O
V
XI O) C O! O
0. Z Z K Z Z
113
-------
1
Ul
_J
Q.
»-»to»-toooino
V CO V «M V O
o o in in co
v *- v v to
i
o
>O OJ CM O
,'O
g
tnrocoiAio^^*
roo --a1
o »*oo « CM (M r\J
v o v r^ v v v
3 H-
UJ O
a: g cd
2 " g
S |
V)
o
r>j
1
Ul
to a:
.j
t3 *~
S <
o
LU
a.
v>
* z
fe " S
Ij UJ S
S 1; -
5 «£ *<
" I
U
2
u
5
1
&
^^ o to o m to to to o
o*vvvv*^
l->>-IM
114
-------
TABLE A-27
METALS RESULTS
FOR
FILTER CAKE SAMPLES
1CP Screening Metals
Al
Sb
As
Ba
Be
Bi
B
Cd
Ca
Ce
Cr
Co
Cu
Dy
Er
Eu
Ga
Ge
Au
Hf
Ho
In
I
Ir
Fe
La
Li
Lu
Pb
Mg
Mn
Hg
Mo
Nd
Ni
Nb
Os
Pd
P
Pt
FACILITY A
SAMPLE DAY 1
DET
ND
ND
OET
ND
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
SAMPLE DAY 2
DET
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
OET
DET
DET
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
NO
ND
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
DET
ND
SAMPLE
DET
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DAY 3
DET
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
ND
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
NO
DET
DET
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
ND
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
115
-------
,"! ' i";,,i: J, '!,! HI!"1, H",
TABLE A-27 (Continued)
METALS RESULTS
FOR
FILTER CAKE SAMPLES
K
Pr
Re
Rh
Ru
Sm
Sc
Se
Si
Ag
Ha
Sr
S
Ta
Te
Tb
Tl
Th
Tm
Sn
Ti
W
U
V
tb
Y
Zn
2r
ICP and AA Ketals
Al
Sb
As
Ba
Be
B
Cd
Ca
FACILITY A
SAMPLE DAY 1 SAMPLE DAY 2
lontinued)
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
ND
DET
DET
ND
ND
DET
ND
1700
<245
<13
20
<0.6
1570
57
27600
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
ND
DET
DET
ND
ND
DET
ND
1800
<260
<13
85
<0.6
1450
56
23900
SAMPLE DAY 3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
ND
DET
DET
ND
ND
DET
ND
1410
<164
<9.0
115
<0.6
920
79
6540
HD
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
DET
DET
ND
DET
ND
ND
ND
ND
DET
ND
DET
DET
ND
DET
DET
ND
ND
DET
ND
1790
<170
<17
123
<0.6
1940
155
11600
116
-------
TABLE A-27 (Continued)
HETALS RESULTS
FOR
FILTER CAKE SAMPLES
FACILITY A
SAMPLE DAY 1
ICP and AA Metals (Continued)
SAMPLE DAY 2
SAMPLE DAY 3
Cr
Co
Cu
Fe
Pb
Mg
Hn
Hg
Mo
Ni
Se
Ag
Na
Tl
Sn
Ti
V
Y
Zn
6
119
220
76300
294
3330
82
<0.1
83
54
<3.0
<0.3
2420
<3.0
72
176
50
<6
1620
8
26
226
81500
106
2520,
9
0
70
<5
<3.0
1
2960
<3.Q
19
45
12
<6
2440
2
31
271
80900
68
1690
<2
<0.1
59
<4
<2.0
1
2740
<2.0
14
42
16
<5
641
<5
63
553
177000
125
2830
<2
<0.1
121
<4
<2.0
2
1540
<2.0
21
61
19
<5
1320
117
-------
Kl
U
C
1^
>-
0
Ul
1
^^
c^ ^^ CL
IM 0
4T* M
A ^ S.
rvi
a
UJ
_i
en
^
o
a.
in
8 ? fc
j; ~ I
0 - I
o ir>
7f » 8
O CO
*- Ul
1 1
to ft.
"l* Ul CO
* B « W CV)
iii S £ o
5 5 «
Si>
O CO
** >-
f-
i.
<
u.
>-
c
0
UJ
^
2
cy
i"
>
*
C
u
i
4
0 «O >
CD ^^ O-
CM K
A O U
o - Sf
! S M. 1
! A 0 I
:
i
+
tn
v.
1
U
i
|
f
10
v.
1
g
CO
"»
1
2
U
w
^N
+
CO
^^
1
z
u
o
5
IM
V
O
CM
V
ro
*
I
vr CM «- -o
10 in «- ro
co r- «-
CM «-
a
o. N- in
CM in -
to
g
i
g
a.
u
Ul
III 1
=f r* Ul
UJ Ul ^ O
118
-------
^O O «
S K. -
§
CO
a
in O
i* CM N. CM «-
« f> »O O CM
Kl f> «» «O «-
8
4^
o
i
CO
i
K IU IU
CL. z z
^ UJ IU
fc M M
s z z
fr- IU IU
uj m co
^
UJ
o.
S-o
Z IU »
IU S I
? 3 3 S
| S S I
-J S O O
S tit u. M- " "j ^
ucMs»-»pa.z:cuj3-rMQ.<
>-
X
*
*~ UJ
»- JO JO ^ ^
(M I U U O CM
i-: ^» z CM CM
U O w Z Z «J O
I «£ v> s^ ^^ I I
Z UJ O UJ Z Z
u a; Z UJ IU vx ^x IU
C Z S Z Z Z
U1LU %xU<
-------
I
f>
>-
R £ In
O
o r\j v
«M o>
V «r~
o in
in CM
v v
oin-*in
«- »
g S S 8
~ v v -
O O O CM
« O CM
5
H-
UJ
X
J
!"
120
-------
2
UJ
_J
Q.
O O Kl «- O O O
g V S S 2 ? §
3 S
o o o
u
>-
rj
>-
c
o
UJ
_J
n.
i
o co «- o «-
O t O U1 -
I
UJ
_j
a.
o o o o o N-
c\j o in in in o
v »- v v v «-
v
&
rj o- KI oo
s s §
S
o
UJ
o o o
§ V £
p v
o o o «o
in in in eo
v v v »-
& & £ &
g § S i S §3 3
K tn & e5
bJ
ft
o. o. n. a. o. a. o.
^j O U U tJ U O
a.
u
a c
c
N
^
l\j*
S u,
T 8
M. « *-. a
~ s M. s
« h- CM »-
\2\
-------
§
CM
A
o 4 o co
CM eS «- CM
in
K) *
a
w
1
(A
u to
* V *
K g
5 5
Uf (/>
< § <
S "" 0 <
S fe t
! « i
u.
K>
2
Ul
D-
1
g
CM
A
CM
O
s
V)
I
u.
S
u
O
0
CM
A
8
CM
A
fc t
C^ w
S
8 t
** s
M i.
« ig
**
Ki m CO
T- in *
'i
<-»
I
± f
"> O
* w
> s
u --' ee
0.
^
u
2 5 S
!§
U ui
.5 S
M O.
Ul Ul CM
< < 3=
(- X >
Sitt «tl
Z X
I I I
CM CM »
CM
U
CM CM Z £ O. Z O ffl
122
-------
2
UJ
_j
o.
(viooeoino-ooo
»OO-«-oin
«- V Kl K> V O V
co
o
o. «» ro in
K> 1- -» O
rvi «- * o
O «- Kl *
O-
R
«- in o in
o K> M v ro «-
I
o Ki
in o
r\j N co
CM
§
in o -o o o
v >o «- o in
S3 5
i
«n
f
^
in
1
O.
.J
u
o. o. o- a. o. o.
_l _! _J -J I '
U U «J U U U
Si 5 5
U (J
-------
"!' ''ni I'll1;;! u11,' ,,"i,|',.!,ii1,
CO
>-
>
u.
CNJ
O
Ul
_l
o.
CO
i
UJ
«J
o.
5
CO
ssGgsgg2sfvvl?
R! JS M §
oiAOooorvioooogg
VV-SSSoe^V^gV
VV5vStMVV g
»
o o o
0 .p -A
V
§o o
IA IA
V
o
i
2§ I
§ §
i § i
!8
§
g
o.
.J
u
saa-aggi8888B88888a
Sn?£i2£^SS^i>^
g
s
124
-------
S
i
So
g
UJ
IJ
in
gin
u v>
-------
TABLE A-30
RCRA CHARACTERISTICS
FOR
SPENT CARBON SAMPLES
FACILITY C
Ignitability (Degrees F)
CorrosJvity
(as pH or mmpy)
Reactivity
PCB's (rng/kg)
TCLP ORGAN1CS ( ug/t )
Votatiles
ACROLEIN
BENZENE
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
2-BUTANONE (MEK>
OIETHYL ETHER
4-HETHYL-2-PENTANONE
Semi-Volatiles
PHENOL
ALPHA-PICOLINE
H-DOOECANE (N-C12)
0-CRESOL
PYRIDINE
0-TOLUIDINE
BEH20IC ACID
P-CRESOL
HEXANOIC ACID
SAMPLE DAY 1 SAMPLE DAY 2
>200 >200
2.60 1.10
rmpy wnpy
(CN-/S-) (CN-/S-)
<2 <2
1307
44
110
364 102
444 243
16
11281 13001
71
601 168
950 238
68
37
256
156 17
145
438 475
SAMPLE DAY 3
>200
1.30
mmpy
(CN-/S-)
<2
154
9383
86
89
31
12
14
598
TCLP HETALS ( ug/l >
At-TCLP
Sb-TCLP
2050
<20
'1070
<200
1360
<20
126
-------
TABLE A-30 (Continued)
RCRA CHARACTERISTICS
FOR
SPENT CARBON SAMPLES
TCLP METALS ( ug/l ) (Continued)
As-TCLP
Ba-TCLP
Be-TCLP
B-TCLP
Cd-TCLP
Ca-TCLP
Cr-TCLP
Co-TCLP
Cu-TCLP
Fe-TCLP
Pb-TCLP
Mg-TCLP
Mn-TCLP
Hg-TCLP
MO-TCLP
Ni-TCLP
Se-TCLP
Ag-TCLP
Na-TCLP
Tl-TCLP
Sn-TCLP
Ti-TCLP
V-TCLP
Y-TCLP
Zn-TCLP
DIOXINS
1.2.3.4.6.7,8-HpCDD
Total HpCDD
OCOD
FACILITY C
SAMPLE DAY 1
<40
1670
<5
2460
<10
18200
<50
<50
<25
372
<100
7710
160
<0.2
<100
104
1670000
<20
258
<50
<50
<50
1180
ND
ND
SAMPLE DAY 2
<20
3140
<5
3700
11
44600
<50
<50
<25
<100
<100
25700
141
<0.4
<100
<40
1660000
<20
<100
<50
<50
<50
2220
ND
ND
SAMPLE DAY 3
<20
3520
<5
4110
<10
46900
<50
<50
<25
268
<100
26600
176
<0.4
<100
<40
1550000
<20
151
<50
<50
<50
2550
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
127
-------
TABLE A-30 (Continued)
RCRA CHARACTERISTICS
FOR
SPENT CARBON SAMPLES
FACILITY C
SAMPLE DAY 1
SAMPLE DAY 2
SAMPLE DAY 3
DIOXINS (Continued)
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
Total HxCDD
2,3,7,8-TCDF
Total TCDF
Total PCDD
ND
ND
3.92 ppb
3.92 ppb
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
128
-------
g
CM
A
O
O
CM
A
f- co
in r>-
R
S5
!? §
§
^~
Kl
1
<
in
§
h-
co
2
co
a:
UJ
i
<
u
g
u
cc
o
>-
_J
o
"
CO
J
O
UJ
_J
o.
.-
r
0
UJ
a.
lo
o
in
A
o
o
(M
A
UJ
a.
CO
CO
g
H-
O CO CO
"" 2 '£
5 u
t ""
CO
o
(M
^-
<
UJ
5
O
in
A
._
^
O
LU
a.
CO
O
A
O >
tO O.
o E
«~ &
O E
S |
o i
O X
o g-
o i
r*
CO
t
z
CJ
CO
1
z
u
t
CO
1
g
^^
CO
1
u
o
V
^.
V
0
V
o
"\r
s
O «- -O M
»- - in «-
O> in o in
>» eo «- CM
in
>-
<
o
Ul
_J
o.
X
«t
CO
*«^
A O E Z
u
^s
o
V
£
S1
£ *f >.
I U I
&L. u> a
o a «
CJ ^ Of
1
g
g u, ==
£ g g £
*- »- DC UJ
UJ UJ O X
5 s s e §
Ul >. _ i <
I O O CM I-
O * i » 3
a »M «- »- a
SJ
m
«
u «-
s
S I
« ** CM
U CM U
Ul
o.
O Z
U
129
-------
«»
a to
c ui
," i
*"* z
o U «2
o tn
- - 5
Kt CC O
1 111 1-
** O « O
S 5 2 m
§ 5 g
" i 1
in
0
CM
o
>-
>-
u
<
u.
O
UJ
«J
tn
i
UJ
_J
en
CV
U
t
L.
<
U.
i
UJ
1
S
^.
a
UJ
_j
en
*. * KS°g'C«S'C§°SWSS|Sr>i§3>9
«"
>
c
u
c
a
SKt> VV
1 *^ , " K»
1
Vt
4
>
K
"
t
b
«
-
c
J U
j i
c :
I
^ CNJ^ooinooooojneagoMCMOOO
s . s . s~vavs^gicv. uj _i q
rj oe O ^ _,
a: u >- ac u x
ui T i UJ « UJ
S O O B O. 3=
130
-------
^
EC/>
UJ
r- _l
lal
«J CO
^ CO co
" ~ 3k
K» oe O
1 LU t-
* CJ ee o
It 1 ^ Q £fl
CD < =e
< 5 o
t- 0
g 5
CJ >
fiC
t
V)
0
0
>-
K-
_J
U
*t
u.
0
t
o
u.
CD
^.
*-
CJ
u_
<:
>-
>
«.
c
<
u.
f\J
^
o
tu
~1
a.
I
«t
CO
5
0
LU
_J
CL
I
<
CO
CM
o
LU
_J
CO
o
UJ
CL
CO
<\J
o
LU
CL
^
CO
;_
i
Ul
_l
>-
<
o
u
CL
?
CO
o o
« o
V O
Kl
T
O O
«- 0
V O
o
f\J
in
w~ O
1
«- O
V O
§
rg
o o
rg o
v o
rg
in
o o
rg o
v o
§
o o
(VJ O
V O
o
«»
4J
i
u
+^
1
w
2
Z CJ* U
p. i
j en to
u < J*
o o o o o o
«** in in in Kt
v v v v v o
o o o o o o
v *^ ut in ist «T
V V V V V OO
0 N. O O O O
CM ro in in m >r
v rg v v v o
o r» o o o o
rvi N- in in in rg
v «- v v v o-
M
000000
rg o ^in in in -
v «- v v v o>
v «-
o o o o o o
rg o in in in o
v « v v v p*
v f^
0 O O 0 0 0
v ^- v v v in
v «-
Q. O. CL CL CL CL
CJ U U U U CJ
h- > ^ >" H" ^"
^ c -i- > >- c
* tn *- N
131
a -fi -s
8- « X-
a. CL CL
rg IM in
o o KI
rg rg <>
ft t
in *A c>
so -o c>
^- ^ *~
«
*f *? ^
£ & &
§1 1
*-» 4-» 4^
a & &
K» *» CO
Co *O Ot
*" M
i g s
a& ft
ON S>
rg h- cp
in *^ r*
4J
00 CO
XX Kl
«
|
1
t-*
{/) *>^ 2C
z
i ~: 1 i
o o o o o
ae z ae a: ae
g g i s §
4-» *-» «-J
& & &
O o Q Q in
Kl CO Z Z O
° ft
4V 4-»
& &
co KI ae z SE
*"*
§ § Si i
§ i § i g
g § g g g
Q
8
X
*. § 8 u. 0
K. « V 8 8
^9 - 3! CO ^"*» CL
a - o as
~. o M. S o
.- H- CM H- »-
-------
TABLE A-32
RCRA CHARACTERISTICS
FOR
FILTER CAKE SAMPLES
FACILITY A
IgnitabHity (Degrees F>
Corrosivity
(as pH or rmpy)
Reactivity
PCB's (ing/kg)
SAMPLE DAY 1
>200
8.50
(as pH)
(CH-/S-)
<3
SAMPLE DAY 2
>200
8.77
(as pH)
(CM-/S-)
<3
SAMPLE DAY 3
>200 >200
7.40 7.38
(as pH) (as pH)
(CN-/S-) (CN-/S-)
<2 <3
TCLP ORGAN ICS ( ug/l )
Volatilcs
1,1,1-TRlCHLOROETHANE
ETHYLBEHZENE
TOLUENE
TR1CHLOROETHENE
2-BUTANONE (HEK)
P-DIOXANE
Semi-Volatiles
4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL
2-CHLOROPHENOL
2,4-DlHETHYLPHEHOL
MAPHTHALEHE
2-HITROPHENOL
4-NITROPHEHOL
PKENOt
N-DODECANE (N-C12)
D1PHENYL ETHER
BIPHENYL
p-CYMEHE
M-DECANE (N-C10)
M-TETRADECANE (H-C14)
N-HEXADECANE (H-C16)
N-OCTADECANE (N-C18)
K-HEXACOSAKE (H-C26)
H-OCTACOSANE (N-C28)
0-CRESOL
2-HETHYLHAPHTHALENE
1076
279
29
22371
848
275
117
1090
88
52
1039
347
183
186
310
125
182
79
365
107
11
116
2987
1827
273
39
181
21687
130
348
179
317
233
14
11
271
123
349
82
549
6132
264
11
305
70
300
138876
217
435
286
25
783
518
19
207
142
132
-------
TABLE A-32 (Continued)
RCRA CHARACTERISTICS
FOR
FILTER CAKE SAMPLES
Semi-Volatiles (Continued)
BENZOIC ACID
P-CRESOL
HEXANOIC ACID
TCLP METALS ( ug/l )
Al-TCLP
Sb-TCLP
As-TCLP
Ba-TCLP
Be-TCLP
B-TCLP
Cd-TCLP
Ca-TCLP
Cr-TCLP
Co-TCLP
Cu-TCLP
Fe-TCLP
Pb-TCLP
Hg-TCLP
Mn-TCLP
Hg-TCLP
Mo-TCLP
Ni-TCLP
Se-TCLP
Ag-TCLP
Na-TCLP
Tl-TCLP
Sn-TCLP
'Ti-TCLP
V-TCLP
Y-TCLP
Zn-TCLP
FACILITY A
SAMPLE DAY 1
673
1051
201
<200
<200
<20
337
<5
12500
11
590000
<50
<50
101
<100
<200
92200
368
<0.2
104
46
<20
<20
1290000
<20
<100
<50
<50
<50
384
SAMPLE DAY 2
1253
429
<200
<20
732
<5
7460
27
429000
<50
153
151
<100
<200
39100
2380
<0.2
<100
113
<20
<20
1400000
<20
<100
<50
<50
<50
11000
SAMPLE
1559
210
641
<20
<20
325
<5
1230
22
143000
<50
262
117
1590
<200
2290
880
<0.2
<100
48
<20
<20
1400000
<20
<100
<50
<50
<50
5950
DAY 3
1998
185
524
<40
<20
497
<5
1870
23
221000
<50
406
102
1060
<200
4150
1490
<0.2
<100
55
<20
<20
1370000
<20
<100
<50
<50
<50
6750
133
-------
TABLE A-32 (Continued)
RCRA CHARACTERISTICS
FOR
FILTER CAKE SAMPLES
FACILITY A
SAMPLE DAY 1
SAMPLE DAY i>
SAMPLE DAY 3
DtOXIHS
1,2,3,4,6.7.8-HpCDD
Total HpCOD
OCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
Total HxCDD
2,3,7,8-TCOF
Total TCOF
Total PCDD
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
134
-------
TABLE A-33
USED OIL CONTAMINANT CONCENTRATIONS AS COMPARED TO
HEALTH BASED CRITERIA
Constituent
Lead
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
T r i chIoroethylene
Naphthalene
Concentration
in Used Oil (1)
(90th percentiIe. ppm)
1200
1300
5000
3100
1000
990
DUS (2)
(Long-Term)
AUQCL (2)
(ppm)
.05
.008
14.3
18.4
.027
(3)
SNARL
(pp U.S. EPA, 1980. Health and Environmental Effects Profile. RCRA Subtitle C Background
Document appendix A. Office of Solid Waste, Washington, D.C.
(3) No health-based standard has yet been developed for naphthalene
135
-------
" ': .i'ili, lit "liilltii;1!!:."-!!
Air Flotation
APR
ASTM
BAT
BETC
BCT
BMP
BOD
BPCTCA
Color.
CLP
Corrosiv.
Conventional
CVAS
GLOSSARY AND ABBREVIATIONS
Consists of saturation of a portion of the
wastewater feed, or a portion of the feed or
recycled effluent from the flotation unit with air
1 at a specific pressure.
Association of Petroleum Refineries
American Society for Testing and Materials
Best Available Technology
Bartlesville Energy Technology Center
Best Conventional Pollutant Control
Technology
Best Management Practices
Biochemical Oxygen-Demanding Pollutants
Best Practical Control Technology Currently
Available
Colorimetric
Method modified for application to solids by
the Superfund Contract Laboratory Program
Hazardous
corrosivity
waste characteristics of
Conventional wastewater chemistry analytes
Cold Vapor Absorption Spectrometry
136
-------
DAF Effluent
DAF Sludge
Dioxin, Furans
Distillation Bottoms
End-of-Pipe Effluent
EPA
Field Test
Filter Cake
Filter Effluent
Fraction
Furnace
GCMS
GOES
GCFPD
Grav.
HRGCHRMS
ICP Metals
Water effluents from DAF
Skimmed sludge from DAF sludge
Chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and
chlorinated dibenzo furans
Asphalt flux extender
Final discharge to sanitary sewer system
Environmental Protection Agency
Test performed at site
Waste clay resulting from various lube oil
polishing practices
Water effluents from a filtration system
A means of further categorizing the sample
for purposes of analysis
Metals analyzed by furnace atomic
absorption
Gas Chromatography Combined with a Mass
Spectrometer detection
Gas Chromatography Combined with an
electron capture detector
Gas Chromatography Combined with a
Flame Photometric Detector
Gravimetric
High Resolution Gas Chromatography
Combined with High Resolution Mass
Spectrometry
Metals analyzed by inductively coupled
plasma spectrometry
137
-------
Ignit.
Influent
Ion Chrom.
ITD
Method
Hazardous waste characteristic of ignitability
Untreated process wastewater
Ion Chromatography
Industrial Technology Division
EPA Method Number
NIPER
NIOSH
NORA
NPDES
NSPS
NTIS
Oily Sludge
OSW
Organic
POTW
PCB
PNA
RCRA
React.
National Institute for petroleum Energy
Research
National Institute Occupational Safety and
Health
National Oil Recyclers Association
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System
New Source Performance Standards
National Technical Information Service
Settled solids from a process, almost any
flocculated, settled mass
EPA Office of Solid Waste
A material that contains carbon compounds
Publicly Owned Treatment Works
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
Polynuclear Aromatics
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Hazardous waste characteristic of reactivity
138
-------
sec
Scrubber Effluent
SIC
SNARL
SPADNS
Stripper Effluent
Spent Carbon Wastes
Spent Clay
TCLP
IDS
Titr.
TSS
TVOC
VOA
Sample Control Center, an EPA contract
operation for management of environmental
samples.
Flue gas scrubber water
Standard Industrial Classification
Suggested No Adverse Response Level
Distillation followed by colorimetric analysis.
Sour water stripper effluent
Activated carbon treatment wastes
Waste clay resulting from various clay contact
filtration practices.
Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
Total Dissolved Solids
Titrimetric
Total Suspended Solids
Total Volatile Organic Compounds
Volatile Organics Analysis
139
-------
LIST OF REFERENCES
1. Villanova University, PA. Water Pollution Control Demonstration. 1968.
2. Cukor, P.M., M.J.Keaton, and G. Wilcox. A Technical and Economical Study of
Waste Oil Recovery. Part 111 Economic, Technical and Institutional Barriers to
Waste Oil Recovery. Teknekron, Inc., Berkeley, CA. October 1973.
3. Whisman, M.L, J.W. Goetzinger, and F.O. Cotton. Waste Lubricating Oil
Research: An Investigation of Several Re-refining Methods. U.S. Bureau of
Mines, Bartlesville Energy Research Center, Bartlesville, OK. Report of
Investigations 7884. 1974.
4. Whisman, M.L., J.W. Goetzinger, and F.O. Cotton. Waste Lubricating Oil
Research: Some Innovative Approaches to Reclaiming Used Crankcase Oil. U.S.
Bureau of Mines, Bartlesville Energy Research Center, Bartlesville, OK. Report of
Investigations 7925. 1974.
5. Weinstein, N.J. Waste Oil Recycling and Disposal Prepared by Recon Systems,
Inc. August 1974.
6. "Oregon Traces Flow of Hazardous Materials." Solid Wastes Management (New
York). 18:48-148, March 1975.
7. Preliminary Assessment of Waste Oil Re- Refining. Aerospace Corp., El Segundo,
CA, Env & Energy Conservation Division. 1976.
8. Bigda, R.J. & Associates. Comparison of BERG Re-refining Process with
Acid/Clay/ Distillation Process. United States Department of Energy, Bartlesville
Energy Research Center, Bartlesville, OK. Publication No. BERC/RI-77/19.
December 1977.
9. Bigda, R. J. & Associates. Predesign Cost Estimate for Re-refined Lube Oil Plant.
United States Department of Energy, Bartlesville Energy Research Center,
Bartlesville, OK. Publication No. BERC/RI- 77/11. June 1977.
140
-------
10. Swain, J.W. Assessment in Industry Hazardous Waste Management Petroleum
Re-Refining Industry. Wellesley, MA. June 1977.
11. Liroff, S.D. Management of Environmental Risk: A Limited Integrated Assessment
of the Waste Oil Re-Refining Industry (Final Report). Teknekron, Inc., Berkley, CA,
Resource Management Division. March 1978.
12. Bigda, R.J., and Associates. The BERG Re- Refining Process: Comparison of
Hydrofinishing Verses Clay Contacting. Richard J. Bigda & Associates, Tulsa, OK.
July 1978.
13. Irwin, W.A. "Used Oil: Collection, Recycling and Disposal." Technology Review.
80:54-61, August/September 1978.
14. Environmental Assessment of Residual Oil Utilization (Second Annual Report).
September 1978.
15. Benham-Blair-Holway & Spragins. The BERG Re- refining Process: An
Engineering Evaluation. U.S. Department of Energy, Bartlesville Energy
Technology Center, Bartlesville, OK. Publication No. BETC/RE-79/1. December
1978.
16. Brinkman, D.W., F.O. Cotton, and M.L Whisman. Solvent Treatment of Used
Lubricating Oil to Remove Coking and Fouling Precursors. U.S. Department of
Energy, Bartlesville Energy Technology Division, Bartlesville, OK. Publication No.
BETC/RI-78/20. December 1978.
17. Whisman, M.L "New Re-Refining Technologies of the Western World." Journal of
the American Society of Lubrication Engineers. 35:249-253, May 1979.
18. Benham-Blair-Holway and Spragins. Comparison of Sludge Separation
Processes in the BERG Used Lubricating Oil Re-Refining Process. U.S.
Department of Energy, Division of Industrial Energy Conservation, Tulsa, OK.
Publication BETC/4343-1. August 1979.
19. Linnard, R.E., and LM. Henton. "Re-refine waste oil with PROP." Hydrocarbon
Processing. 58:148-154, September 1979.
20. Thompson, C.J. and M.L. Whisman. "Waste Oil Recycling Utilizing Solvent
Pretreatment". National Bureau of Standards Special Publication 556. September
1979.
141
-------
21. Reynolds, J.W., M.L Whisman, D.W. Brinkman, J.W. Goetzinger, and P.O. Cotton.
"From oil: oil." Chemtech. October 1979. pp. 629-631.
22. Cotton, P.O., D.W. Brinkman, J.W. Reynolds, J.W. Goetzinger, and M.L. Whisman.
Pilot- Scale Used Oil Re-Refining Using a Solvent Treatment/Distillation Process.
U.S. Department of Energy, Bartlesville Energy Technology Center, Bartlesville,
OK. Publication No. BETC/RI-79/14. January 1980.
23. Engineering Design of a Solvent Treatment/Distillation Used Lubricating Oil Re-
Refinery. Stubbs Overbeck & Associates, Inc., Houston, TX. June 1980.
24. Weinstein, N.J., and D.W. Brinkman. Feasibility Study for the Retrofitting of Used
Oil Re-Refineries to the BETC Solvent Treatment/Distillation Process. U.S.
Department of Energy, Bartlesville Energy Technology Center, Bartlesville, OK,
and RECON Systems, Inc., Somerville, NJ. Publication No. DOE/BC10044-8.
September 1980.
25. Vanik, C.A, and B. Gonchar. "Recycling of Used Oils." Second European
Congress of the Recycling of Used Oils (Paris). September/October 1980.
26. Brinkman, D.W., M.L. Whisman, NJ. Weinstein, and H.R. Emmerson.
Environmental, Resource Conservation, and Economic Aspects of Used Oil
Recyucling. U.S. Department of Energy, Bartlesville Energy Technology Center,
Bartlesville, OK. Publication No. DOE/BETC/RI-80/11. April 1981.
27. Reynolds, J.W., and D. Brinkman. Application of the BETC Re-Refining
Technology to Some State-of-the-Art Commercial Lube Oils. U.S. Department of
Energy, Bartlesville Energy Technology Center, Bartlesville, OK. Publication No.
DE81024428. July 1981.
28. Berry, R.I. "Oil re-refining route is set for two plants." Chemical Engineering.
October 1981. pp. 92-93.
29. Bowman, L.O. "Used oil management update." Hydrocarbon Processing.
February 1982. pp. 86-89.
30. Weinstein, K.D., T.D. Myers, S.R. Craft. Enhanced Utilization of Used Lubricating
Oil Recycling Process By-Products. U.S. Department of Energy, Booz, Allen &
Hamilton, Inc., Bethesda, MD. Publication No. DOE/BC/10059-19 (DE82007671).
March 1982.
142
-------
31. Reynolds. J.W.. etal. A Closed-Loop Study of the Effects of Multicycle Re-
Refining of Automotive Lubricating Oil. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bartlesville
Energy Technology Center, Bartlesville, OK. Publication No. DE82 005160.
March 1982.
32. Gabris, T. Emulsified Industrial Oils Recycling. U.S. Department of Energy,
Bartlesville Energy Technology Center, Bartlesville, OK. Publication No. DOE-
BC/10183-1 (DE82009992). April 1982.
33. Cowan, T.M., and D.W. Brinkman. Banbury Oil Recycling. U.S. Department of
Energy, Bartlesville Energy Technology Center, and Hydrocarbon Recyclers, Inc.
Publication No. DOE/BC/10329-4. April 1982.
34. Gressel, A. "Waste Oils and Solvents Justify By-Products Recovery Plant."
Industrial Wastes. July/August 1982. pp. 23-25.
35. Brinkman, D.W., M. Gottlieb, and K. Koelbel. "Used motor oil poses environmental
problem." Oil & Gas Journal. August 9,1982. pp. 163-165.
36. Crandall, M.S. Pilot Control Technology Assessment of Chemical Reprocessing
and Reclaiming Facilities. August 1982.
37. Crandall, M.S. Pilot Control Technology Assessment of Chemical Reprocessing
and Reclaiming Facilities: Walk-Through Survey Report of North Carolina Oil Re-
Refining Facility. Gardner, North Carolina. August 1982.
38. Cotton, F.O. Waste Lubricating Oil: An Annotated Review. U.S. Department of
Energy, Bartlesville Energy Technology Center, Bartlesville, OK. Publication No.
DOE/BETC/IC-82/4. October 1982.
39. . Booth, G.T. Ill, S.S. Odojewski, R.W. Rakoczynski, D.W. Brinkman. Used
Lubricating Oil Re-Refining Demonstration Plant Data Acquisition - Topical Report I
- Environmental Considerations. U.S. Department of Energy, Booth Oil Company,
Inc., Buffalo, NY. Publication No. DOE/BC/10562-5. January 1983.
40. Brinkman, D.W, K.D. Weinstein, and S.R. Craft. "Utilization of By-Products from
Used Oil Re-refining." Energy Progress. 3(1):44-49. March 1983.
41. Wilson, D.B., and D.W. Brinkman. Hydrotreating for Re-Refined Lubricating Oil.
U.S. Department of Energy, Bartlesville Energy Technology Center, and New
Mexico State University. Publication No. DOE/BC/10332-1 (DE 83009351).
143
-------
42. Surprenant, N.R, W.H. Battye, P.P. Fennelly, and D.W. Brinkman. The Fate of
Hazardous and Nonhazardous Wastes in Used Oil Disposal and Recycling. U.S.
Department of Energy, GCA Corporation, Bedford, MA. Publication No.
DOE/BC/10375-6. October 1983.
43. Becker, D.A., S.M. Hsu, S. Weeks, D.W. Brinkman. Lubricating-Oil Basestock
Data and Analysis: Based on the ASTM-NBS Basestock Consistency Study.
U.S.Department of Energy, Bartlesville Energy Technology Center, Bartlesville,
OK, and National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC. Publication No.
DOE/BC/10749-2 (DE84 002002). October 1983.
44. Gonzales, T.A. Used Lubricating Oil Re- Refining Demonstration Plant Data
Acquisition: Lakewood Oil Service. November 1983,
\ , , ,
45. Brinkman, D.W., P. Fennelly, and N. Suprenant. "The Fate of Hazardous Wastes
in Used Oil Recycling." National Bureau of Standards Special Publication 674.
Conference on Measurements and Standards for Recycled Oil - IV, Gaithersburg,
MD. July 1984.
46. Brinkman, D.W., M.L Whisman. Recovery of Navy Distillate Fuel from Reclaimed
Product. U.S. Department of Energy, National Institute for Petroleum and Energy
Research, Bartlesville, OK. Publication No. DOE/BC/10823-6-Vols. 1 & 2
(DE85000102). November 1984.
47. Bhan, O.K., W.P. Tai, D.W. Brinkman. Hydrofinishing of Re-Refined Used
Lubricating Oil. U.S. Department of Energy, National Institute for Petroleum and
Energy Research, Bartlesville, OK. Publication No. DOE/BC/10826-1
(DE86010849).
. i,! ' ; ' I
I '
48. Wells, J.W., and D.W. Brinkman. "Recovery of Naval Distillate Fuel from Waste
Marine Diesel Fuel." SAE Technical Paper Series. Government/Industry Meeting
& Exposition, Washington, DC. May 1985.
49. Brinkman, D.W. "Used Oil: Resource or Pollutant?" Technology Review. July
1985. pp. 47-70.
50. Brinkman, D.W. "Waste Hydrocarbons Recycling." CEP. March 1986. pp. 67-70.
51. Falconer, M., T. Wilson, and P. K. Beynon. "Re-refining used lubricating oil."
Pollution Engineering. XVIII(6):44-46. June 1986.
52. Berk, D.S. "Recycling Systems Give Waste Oil New Life." Plant Engineering.
35:103-106, August 6,1981.
144
-------
53. Franklin Associates, Ltd. Composition and Management of Used Oil Generated in
the United States. Prairie Village, KS. Publication No. PB/85-180-297.
September 1984.
54. Gonzales, T.A., T. Sparks, J J. Yates, H.P. Croke, D.W. Brinkman. Used
Lubricating Oil Re-Refining Demonstration Plant Data Acquisition: Lakewood Oil
Service. U.S.Department of Energy. Publication No. DOE/BC/10658-6
(DE84001156). November 1983.
55. Bennett, K.W. "How Companies are Putting Waste Oil Back to Work." Iron Age.
226:61-67, Decembers, 1983.
56. Swain, J.W., Jr. "Conservation, Recycling, and Disposal of Industrial Lubricating
Fluids." Journal of the American Society of Lubrication Engineers. 39:551-554,
September 1983.
57. Weinstein, K.D., T.D. Myers, and S.R. Craft. Enhanced Utilization of Used
Lubricating Oil Recycling Process By-Products. U.S. Department of Energy,
Booz, Allen & Hamilton, Inc., Bethesda, MD. Publication No. DOE/BC/10059-19
(DE82007671). March 1982,
58. Bidga, R. J. & Associates, and D.W. Brinkman. Review of All Lubricants Used in
the U.S. and Their Re-Refining Potential. U.S. Department of Energy, Bartlesville
Energy Technology Center, and Richard J. Bidga & Associates, Tulsa, OK.
Publication No. DOE/BC/30227-1. June 1980.
59. Bloch, H.P. "Results of a Plant-wide Turbine Lube Oil Reconditioning and Analysis
Program." Lubrication Engineering. 40:402- 408, July 1984.
60. Whisman, M.L, J.W. Goetzinger, and F.O. Cotton. Waste Lubricating Oil
Research: A Comparison of Bench-Test Properties of Re- refined and Virgin
Lubricating Oils. U.S. Department of Mines, Bartlesville Energy Research Center,
Bartlesville, OK. Report of Investigation 7973. 1974.
145
-------
-------