&EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
EPA-450/2-90-006
February 1990
Air
Survey of State and Local
Air Pollution Agencies'
Activities and Costs
-------
-------
DCN 90-203-080-78-02
Radian No. 203-080-78
EPA Contract No. 68-02-4392
Work Assignment No. 78
EPA No.: EPA-450/2-90-006
SURVEY OF STATE AND
LOCAL AIR POLLUTION AGENCIES'
ACTIVITIES AND COSTS
Prepared for:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Regional Operations Branch
Durham, North Carolina
Prepared by:
Radian Corporation
Research Triangle.Park, North Carolina
February 28, 1990
-------
-------
DISCLAIMER
This report has been reviewed by the Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, and approved for publication
as received from Radian Corporation. Approval does not signify that the
contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the U. S. Environmental
Protection Agency, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products
constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
n
-------
-------
CONTENTS
Section Page
LIST OF TABLES iv
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY E-l
E.I Introduction E-l
E.2 Description of the Data Base E-l
E.3 Summary of Response Data E-2
E.3.1 Annual Expenditures E-3
E.3.2 Workyear Costs E-4
E.3.3 Distribution of Expenditures E-4
1.0 INTRODUCTION , 1-1
2.0 DISCUSSION OP DATA 2-1
2.1 Variability in Cost of Doing Business 2-1
2.2 Expenditures by Major Activity 2-1
2.3 Monitoring 2-11
2.4 Compliance 2-18
2.5 New Source Review 2-21
2.6 Regulation Writing and SIPs 2-21
2.7 Air Toxics 2-23
2.8 Administration 2-23
2.9 Other Activities 2-23
2.10 Non-Section 105 Funds 2-37
APPENDIX A List of Responding Agencies
APPENDIX B Data Forms Used in the Survey
APPENDIX C Additional Tables
iii
-------
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table
E-l
E-2
E-3
E-4
E-5
E-6
2-1
2-2
2-3
2-4
2-4a
2-5
2-6
2-7
2-8
2-9
2-10
Distribution of State/Local Agency Expenditures by
Major Category of Activity
Distribution of Ambient Monitoring Expenditures
Average Annual Cost Per Monitor
Distribution of Stationary Source Compliance
Expenditures by Activity
Average Unit Costs for Selected Compliance
Activities
Numbers of Permits Reviewed and Issued and
Associ ated Costs
Average Agency Cost Per Workyear Overall and State and
Local Agenci es
Summary of Average Agency Cost Per Workyear by Region..
Summary Results of Per Capita ($/Person) Expenditures
Overall and State and Local Agencies .
Summary Results of Per Capita ($/person) Agency
Expendi tures by Regi on
Summary Results of Total and Federal Funds by Region ..
Summary Results of Total Agency Expenditures for Each
Major Activity - All Responding Agencies
Summary Results of Total Expenditures for Each
Major Activity for Local Agencies
Summary Results of Total Expenditures for Each
Major Activity for State Agencies
Summary Report of Criteria Pollutant Monitoring
Al 1 Respondi ng Agenci es
Summary Results of Ambient Monitoring Expenditures
by Activity - All Responding Agencies
Summary Results of Ambient Monitoring Expenditures
for Local Agenci es
Page
E-3
E-4
E-5
E-5
E-6
E-6
2-2
2-3
2-4
2-5
2-6
2-7
2-8
2-8
2-13
2-14
2-15
iv
-------
LIST OF TABLES
(Continued)
Table Page
2-11 Summary Results of Ambient Monitoring Expenditures
for State Agencies 2-15
2-12 Summary Report of Stationary Source Compliance
All Responding Agencies 2-19
2-13 Summary Report of Stationary Source Compliance
for Local Agencies 2-20
2-14 Summary Report of Stationary Source Compliance
for State Agencies 2-20
2-15 Summary of Compliance Inspection Activities
Percent of Total Inspection Expenditures
All Responding Agencies 2-22
2-16 New Source Review Application and Issuance
All Responding Agencies 2-24
2-17 New Source Review Application and Issuance
for Local Agencies 2-25
2-18 New Source Review Application and Issuance
for State Agencies 2-25
2-19 SIP and Regulation Development and Adoption
Major/Comprehensive SIPs and Revisions
Al1 Respondi ng Agenci es 2-26
2-20 SIP and Regulation Development and Adoption
Minor Revisions and Corrections
All Responding Agencies 2-27
2-21 SIP and Regulation Development and Adoption
Development of Mobile Source Regulatory Programs
All Responding Agencies 2-28
2-22 SIP and Regulation Development and Adoption
Development of SIP Data Bases (Inventories)
All Responding Agencies 2-29
2-23 Average Cost and Range of Cost for Major SIPs
for Ozone, PM-10 and Carbon Monoxide
All Responding Agencies 2-30
-------
LIST OF TABLES
(Continued)
Table Page
2-24 Frequency Distribution of Cost of Toxics Programs
Percent of Total Air Program
Al1 Responding Agencies 2-31
2-24a Air Toxics Programs Expenditures Reported for
Various Activities 2-32
2-25 Expenditures in Federal vs. State/Local Air Toxic
Programs Percent of Total Air Program Budget
for Local Agencies 2-33
2-26. Expenditures in Federal vs. State/Local Air Toxic
Programs Percent of Total Air Program Budget
for State Agencies 2-33
2-27 Resources Allocated for Training and Public
Information Expenditures and Percent of Total
Expenditures All Responding Agencies 2-34
2-28 Resources Allocated for Training and Public
Information Expenditures and Percent of Total
Expenditures for Local Agencies ...- 2-35
2-29 Resources Allocated for Training and Public
Information Expenditures and Percent of Total
Expenditures for State" Agencies 2-35
2-30 Other State and Local Activities Expenditures and
Percent of Total Agency Budget
All Responding Agencies 2-36
2-31 Non-105 Activities Expenditures and Percent of Total
Expenditures - Both State and Local Agencies 2-38
VI
-------
-------
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
E.I INTRODUCTION
This report presents a compilation of data supplied to EPA by 86 (out of
106 requested) State (45) and local (41) air pollution agencies concerning
their operations and costs for their most recent year of record. A list of
responding agencies is provided in Appendix A of this report. For the most
part, the data supplied pertain to either the fiscal year of 1987 or 1988,
depending on each jurisdiction's specific accounting and fiscal recordkeeping,
and represent about 82% of EPA's State/local agency grantees.
EPA decided to compile and analyze this information for use in the
planning and grants process. Once analyzed and interpreted, these data will
foster a better understanding of the factors that contribute most to the cost
of operating State/local air programs and help to better predict the impacts
of new federal programs. Furthermore, analyses of these data will:
• Help support budget proposals;
• Assist evaluation of "disinvestment" opportunities; and
• Help define "core" SIP activities.
E.2 DESCRIPTION-OF THE DATA BASE
The data requested of 106 State and local air pollution agencies are
shown on the data survey forms in Appendix B and can be grouped into the
following three levels of information:
• General - consists of identifying information, overall funding and
expenditure summaries, demographic data and source and air pollution
characteristics.
• Major Categories of Activities - consists of expenditure summaries
of the following eight groups of activities:
Ambient monitoring,
Compliance,
E-l
-------
New Source Review/Permitting,
SIP and Regulation Development,
Air Toxics programs,
Administration (training, etc.),
Non-Section 105 activities,
Other.
t Subcategories of Activities - consists of activities and their
expenditures by specific subcategories of each of the above eight
major categories.
*
After various degrees of "reasonableness" checks , all data were input to
a SAS® data set to perform first level statistics (e.g. distributions,, means,
etc.). The results of these statistics presented in this report should
neither be viewed as representative nor statistically valid because no such
statistical tests have been performed. Rather, they are presented merely to
give some initial idea of the approximate distributions of agency costs and
activities. This caveat must be kept in mind because of the many omissions
and errors in the data supplied and because some items in the questionnaire
were interpreted by respondents in several different ways. While the data
*
applicable to the major categories was fairly comprehensive (approximately
50-85% response rate), data for many subcategories were inconsistently
supplied, presumably because of their narrow level of detail and/or
insufficient time or resources to acquire and report these data. Finally,
when costs are broken out by State and local agency, no conclusions should be
drawn about the relative burden on one type of agency over the other.
E.3 SUMMARY O'F RESPONSE DATA
Discussed below are some highlights of the summaries of activities and
expenditures that were derived from the data base.
"Reasonableness" checks consisted of checks performed by both EPA and Radian
to ascertain that all values fell within expected ranges.
E-2
-------
E.3.1 Annual Expenditures
State and local air pollution agencies reported that 75 percent and
82 percent, respectively, of their total expenditures comprised activities in
four major categories, as shown in Table E-l. Expenditures for the other four
major expenditure categories (air toxics, SIP and regulation development,
non-105 activities, and "other") comprised 25 percent and 17 percent of total
reported expenditures for State and local agencies, respectively.
TABLE E-l.
DISTRIBUTION OF STATE/LOCAL AGENCY EXPENDITURES
BY MAJOR CATEGORY OF ACTIVITY
Ma.ior Category
% of Total
State Agency
% -of Total.
Local Agency
Stationary Source Compliance
Ambient Monitoring
Administration
New Source Review/Permitting
Air Toxics
SIP/Regulation Development/ Adopt ion
Non-Section 105 Activities
Other State/Local Activities
26
25
14
10
5
9
5
6
34
23
16
10
3
6
7
2
Eighty-one of the 86, reporting agencies supplied sufficient information
to calculate "per capita" costs of air programs. For these agencies, the
annual per capita cost of air programs averaged $1.19 per citizen. These
values ranged from $.37 to $2.69 per citizen for State agencies and $.39 to
$2.56 for most local agencies. One local agency reported per capita
expenditures of $6.77 per citizen.
re
Such an agency is defined in this report as a local agency directly funded by
EPA for the purpose of implementing Clean Air Act activities. Expenditures
for pass-thru-locals are incorporated in the State data.
E-3
-------
E.3.2. Workyear Costs
The average cost per workyear, as reported by State agencies, is
approximately $39,000 and ranges from about $20,000 to $65,000 on an
agency-wide basis. Similarly, local agencies reported their average,
agency-wide costs per workyear to be about $36,000 and ranges from $21,000 to
$53,000.
E.3.3. Distribution of Expenditures
Summaries of the distributions of activities and their costs are shown
below for three major expenditure categories selected by EPA -- ambient
monitoring, stationary source compliance and new source review.
Ambient monitoring. These expenditures are broken out by percent of
State and local agency expenditures for the various monitoring activities.
The average annual costs per monitor are also given for the six criteria
pollutants. Overall, 5,093 monitors were operated by the responding agencies
at a cost of $30,236,000.
TABLE E-2. DISTRIBUTION OF AMBIENT MONITORING EXPENDITURES
State Agencies Local Agencies
(% of total (% of total
Reported ambient Reported Ambient
Monitoring Monitoring
Monitoring Activity Expenditures) Expenditures)
Criteria Pollutants - SLAMS
Criteria Pollutants - NAMS
Criteria Pollutants - Other Special Purpose
Noncriteria Pollutants - Toxics
Noncriteria Pollutants - Other
Reporting and Data Processing
Other Monitoring Activities
Pollutant Standard Index (PSI)
TOTAL
28
22
11
13
9
12
4
_i
100
32
24
10
4
6
11
7
6
100
E-4
-------
TABLE E-3. AVERAGE ANNUAL COST PER MONITOR
Pollutant (Cost/Monitor, $)
NO,
SO,
ll
PMi«
TSP
Lead
11,000
10,000
8,900
8,900
4,800
3,200
2,700
Stationary source compliance. These expenditures are broken out by
percent of State and local agency expenditures for the various compliance
activities. The average unit costs for several selected compliance activities
are also broken out by percentage of State and local agency budget. Overall,
107,540 inspections were carried out by responding agencies at a cost of
$14,758,000 (includes asbestos demolition and renovation (D/R)). Some 60,084
citizen complaints were responded to at a cost of $6,385,150. A total of
20,322 enforcement actions were completed at a cost of $7,742,000.
TABLE E-4. DISTRIBUTION OF STATIONARY SOURCE COMPLIANCE
EXPENDITURES BY ACTIVITY
State Agencies-
(% of Total
Reported Compliance
Local Agencies
(% of Total
Reported Compliance
Activity
Source Inspection
Citizen Complaint Responses
Enforcement Actions
Operating Permit Review/Renewal
Asbestos D/R Surveillance
Stack Emissions Monitoring
Compliance Reporting to EPA
Other Compliance Activities
Expenditures)
32
11
19
10
7
11
4
.6
100%
Expenditures)
37
24
14
11
7
3
3
_1
100%
Cost is defined as capital plus labor.
E-5
-------
TABLE E-5. AVERAGE UNIT COSTS FOR SELECTED COMPLIANCE ACTIVITIES
Source
Insoections
Citizen
Complai nt Enforcement
Resoonses Actions
Review of Asbestos Stack
Asbestos D/R Site Emissions
Notifications Inspections Monitoring
$l'37/each $106/each $380/each
$31/each
$130/each $l,100/each
New Source Review. These expenditures and numbers processed are broken
out by State and local agencies. Some 20,510 New Source Review and Prevention
of Significant Deterioration operating permits were reviewed by the responding
agencies at a cost of $8,711,000.
TABLE E-6. NUMBERS OF PERMITS REVIEWED AND ISSUED
AND ASSOCIATED COSTS
Permit Type
State Agency
Reported Unit
Number Cost
Processed f$/Permit)
Local Agency
Reported Unit
Number Cost
Processed f$/Permit)
Major
Minor
Source
Source
(greater than lOOT/yr)
(less than lOOT/yr)
1
12
,180
,743
$2,417
$398
92
6,497
$1,878
$95
Data summaries and descriptive statistics for other major activity
categories and subcategory information provide'd by the 86 State and local
agencies are presented in greater detail in the remainder of this report.
E-6
-------
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The data compiled in this report were supplied to EPA by 86 State (45)
and local (41) air pollution agencies. A list of responding agencies appears
in Appendix A. The information covers operations and cost for the agencies'
most recent year of record—usually fiscal year 1987 or 1988; these costs
represent about 82 percent of EPA's State and local grantees.
The data requested by the 106 agencies are shown on the data survey form
in Appendix B. Additional data are presented in Appendix C.
Data are summarized in Section 2 under ten major categories of activity:
variability in cost of doing business, expenditures by major activity,
monitoring, compliance, new source review, regulation writing and SIPs, air
toxics, administration, other activities, and non-105 funded activities.
Although the-data have been subjected to "reasonableness"* checks, these
statistics should be viewed as neither representative nor statistically valid
because no statistical tests have been performed, because of omissions and
errors in the data supplied, and because of some lack of clarity in the data
forms themselves. Finally, when costs are broken out by State and local
agency, no conclusions should be drawn about the relative burden on one type
of agency over the other.
Rather, the data in this report should give some initial idea of the
approximate distributions of agency costs and activities.
"Reasonableness" checks consisted of checks performed by both EPA and Radian
to ascertain that all values fell within expected ranges.
1-1
-------
-------
2.0 DISCUSSION OF DATA
2.1 VARIABILITY IN COST OF DOING BUSINESS
Respondents to this category question estimated their agencies' average
costs per workyear based on a 12-month period. They converted "workyears" per
project to dollars. See Tables 2-1 to 2-4.
Nationally, costs ranged from $19,760 to $64,840 with an average of
$37,680. States' annual costs ranged from $19,760 to $64,840 with an average
of $38,830, while local costs per workyear ranged from $21,725 to $52,900 with
an average of $36,385.
In terms of each agency's annual expenditures per citizen, State agency
costs ranged from $0.37 to'$2.69, with an average cost of $1.06. Local
agency costs ranged from $0.39 to $6.77, with an average cost of $1.33. By
region, average per capita cost ranged from $0.67 to $2.63, with the average
over all regions being $1.19.
2.2 EXPENDITURES BY MAJOR ACTIVITY
Respondents to this category question estimated their expenditures for
eight activities: ambient monitoring, stationary source compliance,
NSR/permitting, SIPs and regulations, air toxics, administration, other, and
non-Section 105 activities. These activities are defined in later sections.
Numbers are also given for the percentage of total expenditure each of these
activities represents in a given program. See Tables 2-5 to 2-7. Note that
the "Total Activities Expenditures" dollar amounts given in Table 2-5 do not
always match the detailed tables for these activities given in the succeeding
pages (Tables 2-9, 2-12, 2-16, and so forth). The reason for this is that
some agencies did not include all their activities in the expenditures they
reported. Other agencies gave a total for their expenditures and did not
break funds out into specific activities.
2.2.1 Ambient Monitoring
Nationally, costs of ambient monitoring ranged from $4,100 to $5,549,000
per year, with an average cost of $658,380. The percentage of total
expenditures that ambient monitoring represented in programs averaged
24 percent.
2-1
-------
AGENCY
LOCAL
STATE
Overall
Table 2-1
Average Agency Cost Per Workyear
Overall and State and Local Agencies
Average
Cost
Per
Workyear
($)
36384.64
38828.95
37680.42
Minimum
Cost
Per
Workyear
(S)
21724
19761
19761
Maximum
Cost
Per
Workyear
($)
52900
64840
64840
Number of
Agencies
Responding
39
44
83
2-2
-------
Table 2-2
Summary of Average Agency Cost Per Workyear
by Region
Region
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
Average
Costs
Per
Workyear
($)
41900.25
37871.00
33573.57
35370.60
38507.80
34254.25
35172.22
37151.50
44755.00
44099.50
Minimum
Costs
Per
Workyear
($)
22500
22500
19761
21724
31820
28776
24142
29700
31250
34236
Maximum
Costs
Per
Workyear
($)
56000
50600
47000
58560
44544
40769
46900
51625
64840
52950
Number of
Agencies
Responding
($)
4
4
7
20
10
3
9
6
9
6
2-3
-------
Table 2-3
Summary Results of Per Capita ($/person) Expenditures
Overall and State and Local Agencies
AGENCY
LOCAL
STATE
OVERALL
Number of
Agencies
Responding
38
43
81
Mean
Cost
Per
Capita
1.334
1.061
1.191
Minimum
Cost
Per
Capita
0.393
0.369
0.369
Maximum
Cost
Per
Capita
6.766
2.694
6.766
2-4
-------
Table 2-4
Summary Results of Per Capita ($/person) Agency Expenditures
by Region
Number Mean
of Cost
EPA Agencies Per
Region Responding Capita
X
VIII
IX
I
III
II
IV
VI
V
VII
6
6
8
4
7
4
20
7
10
9
Minimum Maximum
Cost Cost Total
Per Per Total Expenditures
Capita Capita Population ($1000)
Mean
Expenditures
($1000)
2.63
1.42
1.34
1.31
1.30
1.14
1.12
0.92
0.79
0.67
1.19
0.64
0.44
1.04
0.43
0.39
0.39
0.57
0.41
0.37
6.77
2.21
2.56
1.97
2.46
2.02
2.35
1.63
1.28
1.62
9204667
7817987
46242542
11178961
22318098
26265865
46957125
26880025
47824500
13174032
18187.05
12082.10
61840.45
15847.70
18754.10
22620.80
35033.44
24392.38
32460.76
7971.65
3031.17
2013.68
7730.06
3169.54
2679.16
5655.20
1592.43
3049.05
3246.08
885.74
2-5
-------
Table 2-4a
Summary Results of Total and Federal Funds
by Region
REGION
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
Number
Agencies
Responding
4
4
7
20
10
7
9
6
8
6
Mean
Cost
Per
Capita
1.31403
1.13690
1.29944
1.11874
0.78868
0.91999
0.67142
1.41737
1.31949
2.62535
Total
Expenditures
($1000)
15847.70
22620.80
18754.10
35033.44
32460.76
24392.38
7971.65
12082.10
61840.45
18187.05
Total
Federal Funds
($1000)
7135.67
11065.25
7099.08
12209.26
15054.80
7287.48
4927.72
4720.64
19074.82
7245.34
Percent
Federal
Dollars
45.0266
48.9163
37.8535
34.8503
46.3784
29.8761
61.8155
39.0713
30.8452
39.8379
1
.This information is based on the total expenditures and total Federal funds
as reported by the agencies and does not necessarily reflect the ratio of
Federal/State dollars as indicated in the approved grants.
2-6
-------
SO i-l O O O O O
r- «n co CJ o -* en
* SU
esS 3 3
S 5 iJ *
S U T3 O
U C O
** S.2
m -4 <
I -O
w C efl
« ?
^-1 X 13
j> u a
a a
6-> >> o.
0 «!
oi a.
° X 1
§ i El
alii
£ 55
4J
SS3SRSSS
rHrHOOOOOO
O 00 10 <0 -»
I
o u
X U «
U 3 4)
33-i
* 00
"o -S
I
Q. (U
Ul 00
4) <
I
a
*>
g
a
2-7
-------
j£i: ogs
M *4 t) O . — ~
Mil i
• u
fry s
cMoo-roeeo
«or>M-« 3 -C O^ICOrtOrHOin
*4 *Q O »•••••••
u G o o»«ciocnooioo
tj J O r4
I U • O
!^ Ss
M
jj£
ii •£? oStSkcocoolaacn
•50 •
i/l .in»MJ-»-»
CM « •-!
•o
I
I
I
I
x§?
« ^ U X
H AJ P O t-4*T%ptpOtr49VO
O • O f*1inO*O***V*Hr4
•< J-g «* " "
•H O •
0 3
S4QC} OOO<«m-«C4«O
• 33 •«. -c-vcnT^cnmcl*
•9 * •
.3*
i
K
5» O M
rt
I
§
8-
8
I
1
&
&
• u
H4JGO
a SB
SS M
M§!2
y ™ 9
SǤ
5 o w
01
a
H
g
H
S
S
f»
i
G
A Q X u! ul
O. H at
IH H M
w 5 <
I
§
x
•
?
8-
8
u
8
S
3
8
•
-------
States' annual ambient monitoring costs ranged from $36,000 to
$5,549,000, with an average cost of $900,000. The percentage of total
expenditure that ambient monitoring represented in State programs ranged from
6 percent to 44 percent, with an average of 25 percent.
Local agency ambient monitoring costs ranged from $4,100 to $2,999,000,
with an average cost of $387,000. The percentage of total expenditure that
ambient monitoring represented in local programs ranged from 1 percent to
69 percent, with an average of 23 percent.
2.2.2 Stationary Source Compliance
Nationally, costs of stationary source compliance ranged from $19,900 to
$9,865,000 per year, with an,average cost of $781,450. The percentage of
total expenditure that stationary source compliance represented in programs
averaged 29 percent.
States' annual stationary source compliance costs ranged from $73,000 to
$5,580,220, with an average cost of $962,250. The percentage of total
expenditure that stationary source compliance represented in State programs
ranged from 3 percent to 52 percent, with an average of 26 percent.
Local agency stationary source compliance costs ranged from $19,950 to
$9,864,500, with an average cost of $578,047. The percentage of total
expenditure that stationary source compliance represented in local programs
ranged from one percent to 62 percent, with an average of 34 percent.
2.2.3 New Source Review/Permitting
Nationally, costs of NSR/permitting ranged from $3,100 to $5,265,800 per
year per agency, with an average cost of $292,720. The percentage of total
expenditure that NSR/permitting represented in programs averaged 10 percent.
States' annual NSR/permitting costs ranged from $10,700 to $2,688,000,
with an average cost of $368,400. The percentage of total expenditure that
NSR/permitting represented in State programs ranged from .7 percent to
25 percent, with an average of 10 percent.
Local agency NSR/permitting costs ranged from $3,100 to $5,266,000, with
an average cost of $195,000. The percentage of total expenditure that
NSR/permitting represented in local programs ranged from .2 percent to
22 percent, with an average of 10 percent.
2-9
-------
2.2.4 SIPs and Regulations
Nationally, costs of SIPs and regulations ranged from $2,100 to
$2,038,000 per year, with an average cost of $250,000. The percentage of
total expenditure that SIPs and regulations represented in programs averaged
8 percent.
States' annual SIPs and regulations costs ranged from $7,500 to
$2,038,200, with an average cost of $352,000. The percentage of total
expenditure that SIPs and regulations represented in State programs ranged
from 2 percent to 32 percent, with an average of 9 percent. Local agency SIPs
and regulations costs ranged from $2,100 to $1,702,000, with an average cost
of $121,000. The percentage of total expenditure that SIPs and regulations
represented in local programs ranged from .3 percent to 16 percent, with an
average of 9 percent.
2.2.5 Air Toxics
Nationally, costs of air toxics ranged from $0 to $2,973,300 per year,
with an average cost of $131,064. The percentage of total expenditure that air
toxics represented in programs averaged 4 percent.
States' annual air toxics costs ranged from $3,600 to $2,973,300, with an
average cost of $182,574. The percentage of total expenditure that air toxics
represented in State programs ranged from .5 percent to 20 percent, with an
average of 5 percent.
Local agency air toxics costs ranged from $0 to $1,200,000, with an
average cost of $61,850. The percentage of total expenditure that air toxics
represented in local programs ranged from 0 percent to 21 percent, with an
average of 3 percent.
2.2.6 Administration
Nationally, costs of administration ranged from $5,800 to $3,247,000 per
year, with an average cost of $407,103. The percentage of total expenditure
that administration represented in programs averaged 15 percent.
States' annual administration costs ranged from $17,600 to $2,366,000,
with an average cost of $535,500. The percentage of total expenditure that
administration represented in State programs ranged from .5 percent to
46 percent, with an average of 14 percent.
2-10
-------
Local agency administration costs ranged from $5,800 to $3,250,000, with
an average cost of $266,000. The percentage of total expenditure that
administration represented in local programs ranged from 2 percent to
48 percent, with an average of 16 percent.
2.2.7 Other Activities
This category includes activities such as odor control, boiler
inspections, and acid deposition. Nationally, costs of other activities
ranged from $500 to $2,062,000 per year, with an average cost of $154,940.
The percentage of total expenditure that other activities represented in
programs averaged 5 percent.
States' annual costs ranged from $3,800 to $2,062,000, with an average
cost of $283,100. The percentage of total expenditure that other activities
represented in State programs ranged from 0 percent to 30 percent, with an
average of 6 percent.
Local agency costs ranged from $500 to $321,800, with an average cost of
$30,350. The percentage of total expenditures that other activities
represented in local programs ranged from 0 percent to 20 percent, with an
average of 2 percent.
2.2.8 Non-Section 105 Activities
Nationally, non-105 costs ranged from $0 to $3,320,000 per year, with an
average cost of $391,150. The percentage of total expenditure that non-105
activities represented in programs averaged 5 percent.
States' annual non-105 activity costs ranged from $7,000 to $3,320,000,
with an average cost of $444,350. The percentage of total expenditure that
non-105 activities represented in State programs ranged from .1 percent to
46 percent, with an average of 5 percent.
Local agency non-105 costs ranged from $0 to $2,540,000, with an average
cost of $330,860. The percentage of total expenditures that non-105
activities represented in local programs ranged from 0 percent to 77 percent,
with an average of 7 percent.
2.3 MONITORING.
Repondents to this category question broke down further the ambient
monitoring expenditures they reported in Section 2.2.1 according to dollars
spent in:
2-11
-------
• Monitoring criteria pollutants and toxics,
t Reporting and processing monitoring data,
t Implementing the Pollutant Standard Index, and
a Completing other monitoring activities.
Note that "percent of State agency budgets" as used in the following pages
refers to the agency's budget for monitoring activities. See Tables 2-8 to
2-11 for details including expenditures and activities.
2.3.1 Criteria Pollutants - Overall and NAMS/SLAMS
Nationally, costs of monitoring the criteria pollutants ranged from $0 to
$833,940 per year. Respondents to this subcategory question further
subdivided their expenditures in dollars and percentage of total expenditures
information by NAMS and SLAMS, as well as by individual criteria pollutant,
including number of monitors and cost per monitor.
Nationally, NAMS expenditures ranged from $0 to $355,000, with an average
of $34,000. SLAMS costs ranged from $0 to $271,800, with an average of
$40,800. These expenditures accounted for 22 percent and 29 percent,
respectively, of agency budgets.
States' NAMS expenditures ranged from $0 to $355,000, with an average of
$47,000. SLAMS costs ranged from $0 to $271,800, with an average of $53,600.
These expenditures accounted for 16 percent and 21 percent, respectively, of
State agency budgets.
Local agencies' NAMS expenditures ranged from $360 to $152,000, with an
average of $20,500. SLAMS costs ranged from $1,200 to $151,000, with an
average of $26,070. These expenditures accounted for 7 percent and 9 percent,
respectively, of local agency budgets.
For the National Aerometric Monitoring System, or NAMS; the State and Local
Aerometric Monitoring System, or SLAMS; and for special purposes.
2-12
-------
Table 2-8
Summary Report of Criteria Pollutant Monitoring
All Responding Agencies
Number
of
Total
Expenditures
Cost Per
Monitor
Percent of
Criteria
Pollutant
Monitoring
Pollutant Name
Nitrogen Dioxide (N02)
Sulfur Dioxide (S02)
Carbon Monoxide (CO)
Ozone (03)
PM-10
Total Suspended Particulates
Lead (Pb)
Monitors ($1000/year) ($/monitor/year) Expenditures
182
441
344
475
547
1715
482
2018.79
4441.04
3075.21
4219.75
2658.18
5538.87
1289.69
11092.25
10070.37
8931.77
8883.68
4859.56
3229.66
. 2675.71
9
19
13
18
11
24
5
2-13
-------
2s.
3 as
"- >»
•»- J=-O^
X 0) {= O
X ^H
LU V»
coOLOi— to r-» o% o i-< o
r*»mmot—IUICM^
OJCOCMCSIOOCOCVJCO
O
CO
0>
>>
c a> c
2- c> >
W C-O\
<1> 0) C O
Z OT 0) O
«X Q.O
X i-«
•^•ooooooocnr*.
GOOr-imOOCTt^fUO
2?
(O
to
O O CO O CO
Q. Q. Q. «^-
O» S.
CO CO C CO 0)
"t "C2 "ilf-
0) 0) S. O -»J U
"t "ll 01 *S- O
o <_> oeu z
^3
S- 3
o •MO.
zoo.
2-14
-------
ft ft O M» Ol
-ieco
3*1-3
i2 «>
SI f!
0,0
S .
u •
o o a o m a CM
So -J x r«o«>oiOco-*f»co
e -q -~ cj-ro>cMin«rcMin
SSfisSRSS
I
a o m fi a m o>
J=_-- .. v> « in F^ a fi a
» Jig aSSaSSS*
J < f a i-i
aa-t
B-S
x 3 e
si g
G 3 Z *
« a -j —.
u 3 -o o
S4?g§
s»
a o o o e n m o
^l^1rt'1*
waso cMdicocMinfieo
o 9 o a ct m co fi ^ n CM co
H 4 i o CM-*oor>«in ••UvuTls'u
^ o « n • ff
W *^ K *4 O • ft
U U ^ CU U -4 S -g
KWUflM
& 55 355 Si S
*4 UU>*4«Jt4»4 U
-4 4J4JqQ«JQ«^4
U *4"4Ca*^Bfa<-4
y j* » o « u ^ t* o
2-15
-------
2.3.2 Criteria Pollutants (Special Purpose)
Expenditures for monitoring criteria pollutants (special purpose) ranged
from $0 to $207,000, with an average of $22,580. These expenditures accounted
for 11 percent of agency budgets nationwide.
States' expenditures for monitoring this category of pollutant ranged
from $0 to $207,000, with an average of $28,000. These expenditures accounted
for 8 percent of State agency budgets.
On the local level, expenditures for monitoring this category of
pollutant ranged from $900 to $108,600, with an average of $14,260. These
expenditures accounted for 3 percent of local agency budgets.
2.3.3 Noncriteria Pollutants - Toxics
Nationally, expenditures for monitoring noncriteria pollutants - toxics
ranged from $0 to $1,819,000, with an average of $138,882. These expenditures
accounted for 11 percent of agency budgets nationwide.
States' expenditures for monitoring this category of pollutant ranged
from $0 to-$1,819,000, with an average of $173,700. These expenditures
accounted for 10 percent of State agency budgets.
On the local level, expenditures for monitoring this category of
pollutant ranged from $2,200 to $220,000, with an average of $47,580. These
expenditures accounted for 1 percent of local agency budgets.
2.3.4 Noncriteria Pollutants - Other
Nationally, expenditures for monitoring noncriteria pollutants - other
(specific information was not collected to define "other") ranged from $3,400
to $850,000, with an average of $105,990. These expenditures accounted for
8 percent of agency budgets nationwide.
States' expenditures for monitoring this category of pollutant ranged
from $3,400 to $850,000, with an average of $137,400. These expenditures
accounted for 6 percent of State agency budgets.
On the local level, expenditures for monitoring this category of
pollutant ranged from $5,100 to $215,000, with an average of $57,400. These
expenditures accounted for 2 percent of local agency budgets.
2-16
-------
2.3.5 Reporting and Processing
Nationally, expenditures for reporting and processing ranged from $0 to
$235,000, with an average of $29,000. These expenditures accounted for
12 percent of agency budgets nationwide.
States' expenditures for reporting and processing ranged from $0 to
$235,000, with an average of $45,000. These expenditures accounted for
9 percent of State agency budgets.
On the local level, these expenditures for monitoring this category of
pollutant ranged from $200 to $150,000, with an average of $14,000. These
expenditures accounted for 3 percent of local agency budgets.
2.3.6 Pollutant Standard Index Implementation
Nationally, expenditures for implementing the Pollutant-Standard Index
ranged from $0 to $340,000, with an average of $16,600. These expenditures
accounted for 2 percent of agency budgets nationwide.
States' expenditures for implementing the Pollutant Standard Index ranged
from $0 to $40,900, with an average of $13,000. These expenditures accounted
for 1 percent of State agency budgets.
On the local level, expenditures for implementing the Pollutant Standard
Index ranged from $300 to $340,000, with an average of $19,000. These-
expenditures accounted for 1 percent of local agency budgets.
2.3.7 Other Monitoring Activities
Nationally, expenditures for other monitoring activities ranged from $400
to $221,000, with an average of $26,000. These expenditures accounted for
5 percent of agency budgets nationwide.
States' expenditures for other monitoring activities ranged from $3,300
to $221,000, with an average of $30,000. These expenditures accounted for
3 percent of State agency budgets.
On the local level, expenditures for other monitoring activities ranged •
from $400 to $140,000, with an average of $22,600. These expenditures
accounted for 2 percent of local agency budgets.
2-17
-------
2.4 COMPLIANCE
This category breaks out expenditures and percentages of agency
resources for eight compliance activities: inspections, asbestos demolition
and renovation (D/R), enforcement actions, reporting to EPA, stack emission
testing, responding to citizen complaints, operating permit programs, and
miscellaneous. The average costs and percentages are summarized in Table 2-12
on a national level; see Tables 2-13 and 2-14 for State and local costs and
percentages.
Expenditures for inspection of sources averaged $14,760. These costs
represented an average percentage of total expenditures for inspections of
34 percent.
Expenditures for asbestos D/R averaged $3,227. These costs represented
an average percentage of total expenditure for asbestos D/R of 7 percent.
Expenditures for enforcement actions averaged $7,742. These costs
represented an average percentage of total expenditures for enforcement
actions of 18 percent.
Expenditures for reporting to EPA averaged $1,113. These costs
represented an average percentage of total expenditures for reporting to EPA
of 3 percent.
Expenditures for stack emission testing averaged $3,950-. These costs
represented an average percentage of total expenditures for stack emission
testing of 9 percent.
Expenditures for responding to citizen complaints averaged $6,385. These
costs represented an average percentage of total expenditures for response to
citizen complaints of 15 percent.
Expenditures for operating permit programs averaged $4,428. These costs
represented an average percentage of total expenditures for operating permit
programs of 10 percent.
Expenditures for miscellaneous activities averaged $1,912. These costs
represented an average percentage of total expenditures for this collection of
activities of 4 percent.
Data on the inspection activity is further subdivided in Table 2-15 by:
• Number of sources inspected (this ranged from 575 to 58,549);
2-18
-------
Table 2-12
Summary Report of Stationary Source Compliance
All Responding Agencies
Compliance Activity
Compliance Reporting to EPA
Miscellaneous Compliance Activities
Asbestos D/R Surveillance
Monitoring Stack Emissions
Review and Renewal of Operating Permits
Citizen Complaints
Enforcement Actions
Inspection of Sources
Agencies'
Activity
Expenditures
($1000/year)
1112.63
1912.15
3227.35
3949.60
4427.48
6385.15
7742.67
14758.54
Percent
of Agencies'
Compliance
Budget
3
4
7
9
10
15
18
34
2-19
-------
Table 2-13
Summary Report of Stationary Source Compliance
for Local Agencies
Compliance Activity
Compliance Reporting to EPA
Miscellaneous Compliance Activities
Monitoring Stack Emissions
Asbestos D/R Surveillance
Review and Renewal of Operating Permits
Enforcement Actions
Citizen Complaints
Inspection of Sources
Agencies'
Activity
Expenditures
($1000/year)
151.95
366.90
401.23
814.75
1224.70
1550.82
2753.74
4316.11
Percent
of Agencies'
Compliance
Budget
0
1
1
2
3
4
6
10
Table 2-14
Summary Report of Stationary Source Compliance
for State Agencies
Compliance Activity
Compliance Reporting to EPA
Miscellaneous Compliance Activities
Asbestos D/R Surveillance
Review and Renewal of Operating Permits
Monitoring Stack Emissions
Citizen Complaints
Enforcement Actions
Inspection of Sources
Agencies'
Activity
Expenditures
($1000/year)
960.68
1545.25
2412.60
3202.78
3548.36
3631.41
6191.85
10442.43
Percent
of Agencies'
Compliance
Budget
2
4
6
7
8
8
14
24
2-20
-------
• Cost per inspection (ranging from $0 to $9,786);
• Percentage of total inspection cost (ranging from 2 percent to
24 percent);
t Cost per inspection for each source inspection category (ranging
from $25 to $9,790 for Class Al SIPs, from $35 to $2,250 for NSPS,
from $0 to $7,100 for NESHAP, from $20 to $2,950 for Class A2 SIPs,
from $20 to $1,345 for Class B SIPs, and from $18 to $1,000 for
sources where EPA has no co-federal responsibility); and
• By number of annual inspections .per source by source type (13,152
inspections for Class Al SIPs, 10,445 inspections for Class A2 SIPs,
22,077 inspections for Class B SIPs, 2,742 inspections for NSPS, 575
for NESHAP, and 58,549 for sources where EPA has no co-federal
responsibility).
2.5 NEW SOURCE REVIEW
This category of activity covers the number of major and minor sources
reviewed per year, as well as the cost of reviewing both major and minor
sources. Nationally, the number of minor sources reviewed was 19,240 (See
Table 2-16). The number of major sources reviewed was 1,272. The cost of
reviewing major sources ranged from $90 to $6,000, with an average cost of
$2,400. See Tables 2-17 and 2-18 for details.
2.6 REGULATION WRITING AND SIPS
Respondents to questions in this category gave information about their
regulatory expenditures. In addition, the number of actions, and the
percentage of total regulatory expenditures for three types of SIPs: major,
minor, and mobile sources, as well as emission inventories, were calculated..
See Tables 2-19 to 2-23.
Expenditures for major activities totalled $2,900,000, accounting for
22 percent of agencies' activity budgets. Expenditures for minor source
activities totalled $450,600, accounting for 4 percent of agencies' activity
budgets. Expenditures for mobile source activities totalled $4,030,900,
accounting for 32 percent of agency activity budgets. Expenditures for
developing SIP data bases (emission inventories) totalled $3,280,000,
accounting for 26 percent of agencies' activity budgets.
2-21
-------
M
" .
a s
5 3
g | :
s § ;
m n. -4 <
A 5 8 S
A ~4
"•SSI
d • 0.
2*3"
f£ -4
"4
1*4 o
o
ti
§ *
1
I
09
fH
P»
y^
CO
at
S
3
o
n
3
3
in
N
5
s
1
2
U
^
s
ft
ca
i
n
a
D>
a
i
0
o
a
«
CM
w
in
m
CO
m
CM
U9
i
K
it
a
raiulti
»
-------
Of these, costs of major SIPs for ozone ranged from $900 to $72,340, with
an average of $19,830; for PM1Q, ranged from $40 to $32,600, with an average
of $11,425; and for carbon monoxide, ranged from $300 to $154,000, with an
average of $18,700.
2.7 AIR TOXICS
This category of activity covers the cost of implementing and maintaining
air toxics programs. See Tables 2-24 to 2-26.
Of responding agencies, about 90 percent spend 4 percent or less of their
air program budget on air toxics programs. State agency expenditures in
responding to Federal programs accounted for about .5 percent of total agency
budgets. State agency expenditures in implementing State and local regulatory
programs accounted for about 1 percent of total budget. Local agency
expenditures in responding to Federal programs accounted for less than
.5 percent of total budget, and expenditures in implementing State and local
regulatory programs accounted for 2 percent of total budget.
2.8 ADMINISTRATION
This category of activity covers staff training and public information
programs. See Tables 2-27 to 2-29 for details.
Nationally, expenditures for staff training totalled $2,762,000,
accounting for 1 percent of agency activity budgets. Public information
expenditures totalled $2,854,000, accounting for 1 percent of agency activity
budgets. State agency staff training costs totalled $1,640,000, accounting
for about .5 percent of agency activity budgets.
Local agency staff training costs totalled $1,122,000, accounting for
1 percent of agency activity budgets. Public information costs totalled
$1,885,000, accounting for 2 percent of agency activity budgets.
2.9 OTHER ACTIVITIES
This category of activity covers agency work in the areas of odor
control, boiler inspections, acid deposition, and hazardous wastes.
Table 2-30 shows that 29 State and local agencies reported programs for
odor control, 13 reported programs for boiler inspections, 20 agencies
reported they had programs in acid deposition, and 22 reported having programs
2-23
-------
S3
*•*
o o
CM O
CO (/)
v) o>
»—I >r-
!!
A V
11
2-24
-------
CM
ff)
o1
O. V»
ass
CM o
cwoo
^^ ^3
1
CM ^»^=
•~ 8 "o
CC. *J»
esi
§§
A V
88
"A *v
i-H CM
I/I VI
•M -)->
2-25
-------
• O IO 00 CM Cn
>> o to *»• r*. CM o
O CO CO CO ^ i— « t— «
CD to ^r co r^. 10 to
C3 CO f**» P** •— < f» * t-H
i— 4
«•»
1
1 CM
1 CM
CO
CM
o
a>
§
o
CJ
a. c
o o
T3i-
e
•r-
-»->T3 CJ
c c c
-H O>
CM aj co e
> f~
LU g
CQ f- O
O u a. c/i _i o
.a o -a a) <*-
CJ) O Q) Q}
ce as az oi i
c o
CO i-S
CO
o-z:
H-4
CO
u
a»
at
CO
ca
a>
c c e c
CO cO CO CO cO cO
CO CO CO CO CO CO
a. o. a. a. a. a.
02
o. £3. ta. o. a. o.
o o o o o o
CO CO CO CO CO (O
ex a. a. a. ex ex
gj a) QJ aj aj a]
J- i. S. S- S- i.
a. a. a. o_ a. a.
a. o. a. a. a. a.
CO (O CO CO CO CO
2-26
-------
e -4-1 +j CM *»• H
O <*- > O> *-* O O O O K
t O -i— "O .11
O) -M 3 II
Q. O CO
V) -—.
0) 1-
)•• (0
=J 0)
,— +j >, M _4 oo <*) i
W *f* ^» 1—4 •—< ^J- CO '
+j -o o ....
o c o i^ *o in r*. •
H-
(QUO)
-M S-
c t.
esj -r-
LU 0) ce
t/i
O v)
•f- v> vl C
«» C f- C -M
O) -M fl» O
C <_>
O> S.
O f- F— O
CO O) 0) S- •»-
O -O 3 Z
-2 §(S"S S.
ov- o —I 1—4 1—4
(/)(/) V1V) (/)
2-27
-------
4-> 4J -(->
C i- 0)
OJ > O»
o«*--»--a
S. O -4-> 3
a> o CQ
in i
evi
I CO
9 S.
^
•i"
>
•»—
*J
U
s- i.
en o
o o
s. s_
0.0.
(U
(U
03
CS
o o
+•> -(->
(O (O
a> o>
as ae
CO CO
0> 0)
•^ *^
J3.Q
o a
o> at
e s
a.
o
2-28
-------
.,- 0)
£ *
(U
O ' . _
i- O -ft)
3
O. U CO
o co
(O
CM
« •*• co in m * r*.
>> r«« o r*. r^ H esj
O v>
•i- 0}
Q. 1.
O O
o co
H- O) O
O.f-1
x v»-
to vo in o>
CM co r- CO
OO
CM
0) CT>
CD O)
csi a. 19 o>
i o -Q c
CM ^- -f-
UJ
—I
ca
<
I—
O) «J O
a -o a.
V)
C Q. O)
O HMOS
o s_
o- o
OO Q.
O Q
O f- UJ
• —< S. 3Z
a)
c o
(O f—
CD
Q. >
i—i 0)
> o o o o
— c c c e
^ CU 41 4) 01
Z» & c c c
c e e c
o> o o o o
O) «^ -^- -t— •»—
•«-> VI VI VI VI
C (/)
QOQO
Q. Q. Q. Q.
•—i i—< i—i i—«
to oo oo oo
Q. Q. Q. O.
O O O O
> > >
01 O>
2-29
-------
StJ&§ 3SS
•r— O J— CD • • •
x O a. g CM jcp CM
1-8
: o i
en en o
en oo ^H
S_ i=5
'5 $> °^ °^ ^
i 1- -ff 10 ir> id
SSE
• • , •
«} .Q «
* • •
^ CO CO
gjgg
•^
s
I
0.0.0.
CO CO 55
2-30
-------
TABLE 2-24
Frequency Distribution of Cost of Toxics Programs
Percent of Total Air Program
All Responding Agencies
Range
Percent
of
Agency
Budget
0-1
1-2
2-3
3-4
4-5
5-6
6-7
7-8
8-9
Number
of
Agencies
18
19
8
11
. 7
3
1
1
2
2-31
-------
r-. ^ S3
in R SJ
csj co m
s'gjs
C Q C F—i
co co I-H
• • •
o o o
£
.-as- 8&8
ro
SJ J>
Csl . O
8'
llj 01
3=i
t5-E
si
=c S
i-« CM
(TJ
to
2-32
-------
4-> •*•>
e i—o)
o> to cn
o <+- +J -o
S_ O O 3
(O
s-
cn
o
s-
cn
2
0.
X -M
O 10
LU cn
O ••-
(/)
•M O
to
CM
«O i. «rt
o cn a)
o o •*-
1. O
- •
(U
CO
en
-a en
T3 S_ O
— 3 i.
• > O CO
r— S-
(Q <4- O
S. O M-
•»•>
Q.
••- S
-i-> C (O
C <0 V
a> .a cn
T3 i. O
0)
Q.
X
^H CM >>
*-+~+ O
Q. Q. -M
Q Q nj
o>
ex
x
— .— . O
a. a. -u
oo .
cn cn
0) O»i—
•4-» *J IO
to to «j
S- S_ O
cn
ZZ 00
CCS
O O O
•M -M -M
10 (O 40
o o o
<« * to
o>
(O
t
2-33
0) O> <1> O>
0) E E S
•M Ol 01 E E E
C3 MMM
-------
TABLE 2-27
Resources Allocated for Training and Public Information
Expenditures and Percent of Total Expenditures
All Responding Agencies
Grantee Activity
Staff Training
Public Information Programs
Percent
Of
Activity
Budget
1
1
Total
Expenditures
($1000/year)
2762.84
2854.16
Number of
Agencies
Responding
59
56
2-34
-------
TABLE 2-28
Resources Allocated for Training and Public Information
Expenditures and Percent of Total Expenditures
for Local Agencies
Grantee Activity
Staff Training
Public Information Programs
Percent
Of
Activity
Budget
1.46
2.45
Total
Expenditures
($1000/year)
1122.47
1884.75
Number of
Agencies
Responding
34
34
TABLE 2-29
Resources"Allocated for Training and Public Information
Expeditures and Percent of Total Expenditures
for State Agencies
Grantee Activity
Staff Training
Public Information Programs
Percent
Of
Activity
Budget
0.95
0,56
Total
Expenditures
($1000/year)
1640.37
969.41
Number of
Agencies
Responding
25
22
2-35
-------
ssss
9 8 3 &
f-U f=n SH cd
O f-H CO O
o co -H
•is 8 S S S
C £• • • • *
;g W O O O O
rej e> tn P-< in r«*
-M "O • • • •
,0 J5 r-< l-l O O
*O *T3 ^£
CO « I—
ftf
-M «
.O "
S
CM ^r ir>
O CD •£•
s-"o"S
S
en
o ta.-»—
5= S
J
2-36
-------
to support hazardous waste disposal. Total expenditures on all four types of
programs ranged from $212,000 to $580,000. These costs accounted for between
.03 percent and 10 percent of total air program expenditures.
2.10 NON-SECTION 105 FUNDS
This category covers expenditures in non-105 activities. Dollars and
percentage of expenditures are given by State and local agency in Table 2-31.
Total expenditures in non-105 activities for both State and local agencies
totalled $12,517,000, accounting for 26 percent of total expenditures.
2-37
-------
is.
00
SC5
* *
o o
8 °3
111
19
O Q) *»•
i- 'G "S 00 I
TJ •*.«*.
3 SS
1 SS
-
to
tn
2-38
-------
APPENDIX A
List of Responding Agencies
-------
-------
List Of Respondents To Survey
Incorporated In Data Base
16:18 Thursday, May 18,
STATE Name Of Agency
AK ALASKA DEFT. OF ENVIRON. CONSERVATION
AK MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE APC
AL ALABAMA DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL MGMT
AL HUNTSVILLE APC DEPARTMENT (AL)
AL JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPT. OF HEALTH (AL)
AR ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF POLLUTION CONTROL
AZ MARICOPA COUNTY BUREAU OF APC (AZ)
AZ PIMA CO. AIR QUALITY CONTROL DIST. (AZ)
CA BAY AREA AIR QUALITY MGMT. DISTRICT
CA CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD
CA FRESNO COUNTY APC DISTRICT (CA)
CA KERN COUNTY APC DISTRICT (CA)
CA SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MGMT. DISTRICT
CO COLORADO AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT
CT CONNECTICUT DEPT. OF ENVIRON. PROTECTION
DC D'.C. GOVERNMENT
DE DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
FL CITY OF JACKSONVILLE
FL FLORIDA DEPT. OF ENVIRON. REGULATION
FL HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY EPC (FL)
FL PALM BEACH COUNTY HEALTH UNIT
FL PINELLAS CO. AIR QUALITY DIVISION (FL)
GA GEORGIA DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES
IA IOWA DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES
IA LINN COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL (IA)
IA POLK COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL (IA)
ID IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
IL CITY OF CHICAGO DEPT OF CONSUMER SERV
IL ' COOK COUNTY DEPT. OF ENV. CONTROL (IL)
IL ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
IN INDIANA DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL MGMT.
KS KANSAS DEPT. OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT
KS TOPEKA/SHAWNEE CO HEALTH AGENCY
KS WICHITA/SEDGWICK COUNTY DCH (KS)
KS WYANDOTTE COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT -
KY JEFFERSON COUNTY APC DISTRICT (KY)
KY KENTUCKY DIVISION FOR AIR QUALITY
LA LOUISIANA DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
MA MASSACHUSETTS AIR QUALITY CONTROL DIV.
MD MARYLAND AIR MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION
ME MAINE DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
MI MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
MI WAYNE COUNTY APC DIVISION (MI)
MO MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
MS MISSISSIPPI DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCES
MT MONTANA DEPT. OF HEALTH AND ENV SCIENCES
NC COUNTY OF FORSYTH, ENVIRON. AFFAIRS DEPT
NC MECKLENBURG COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF EP (NC)
NC NORTH CAROLINA DIV. OF ENVIRON. MGMT.
NC WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA REGIONAL APC
ND NORTH DAKOTA STATE DEPT. OF HEALTH
NE NEBRASKA DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL
NJ NEW JERSEY DEPT. OF ENVIRON. PROTECTION
NJ SUBURBAN REGIONAL HEALTH COMMISSION (NJ)
A-2
-------
List Of Respondents To Survey
Incorporated In Data Base
16:18 Thursday, May 18,|
STATE Name Of Agency
NV NEVADA DIV. OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
NV WASHOE COUNTY DISTRICT HEALTH DEPT. (NV)
NY NY STATE DEPT. OF ENVIRON. CONSERVATION
OH CLEVELAND DIVISION OF AFC
OH HAMILTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF APC (OH)
•OH REGIONAL APC AGENCY (OH)
OK OKLAHOMA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
OR LANE REGIONAL AIR POLLUTION AUTH (OR)
OR OREGON DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
PA ALLEGHENY COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT
PA PENNSYLVANIA DEPT. OF ENVIRON. RESOURCES
PA PHILADELPHIA AIR MANAGEMENT SERVICES
RI RHODE ISLAND DIV OF AIR & HAZ. MATERIALS
SC SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
SD SOUTH DAKOTA OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY
TN CHATTANOOGA-HAMILTON CO APC BUREAU
TN KNOX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF APC (TN)
TN MEMPHIS-SHELBY CO. HEALTH DEPT. (TN)
TN METRO NASHVILLE/DAVIDSON CO HEALTH DEPT
TN TENNESSEE DIVISION OF APC
TX CITY OF DALLAS HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES-
TX EL PASO CITY-COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT •
TX GALVESTON COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
TX HOUSTON BUREAU OF AIR QUALITY CONTROL
TX TEXAS AIR CONTROL BOARD
UT UTAH BUREAU OF AIR QUALITY
VI VIRGIN ISLANDS DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
VT VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES
WA WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
WI WISCONSIN BUREAU OF AIR MANAGEMENT
WV WEST VIRGINIA APC COMMISSION
WY WYOMING DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
A-3
-------
APPENDIX B
Data Forms Used in the Survey
-------
-------
GENERAL INFORMATION COVER SHEET FOR 1988 JOINT STAPPA/ALAPCO-EP.A PROJECT TO
IDENTIFY STATE/LOCAL PROGRAM ACTIVITIES AND COSTS
0 Name of Agency_
0 Agency Address
0 Agency Contact
0 Contact Telephone ( )
0 EPA Regional Office Contact
"Contact Telephone FTS;
Commercial:
What twelve-month period is the basis fop the accomplishment and resource
data provided in the survey form? (This period should reflect the latest
actual expenditures and should be as close to 1987 as possible.)
0 Do these data reflect the actual work accomplished and resources expended from
an accounting or audit system or do they reflect projections from a workplan
or application?
0 What is the average cost per workyear for the agency that should be used to
convert manpower in the "Workyears" column to dollars?__
0 What does this average cost per workyear include (i.e. direct salary, indirect
salaries—for whom?, travel costs, routine supplies)?
What is the currently approved indirect-cost rate for the Agency? To what
specific costs should this rate be applied to calculate the total indirect cost
for the program? What is the workyear equivalent of the Indirect Costs?
What level of the total air program budget is identified by the agency as
its non-federal continuing eligibility level which it must maintain to be
eligible for any Section 105 grant $ ? What level is identified by
the agency as its non-federal matching level $ ? what percent of
the Section 105 air program budget is represented by the Section 105 Federal
matching share %? What level of the total air program is identified
by the agency as non-federal, non-Section 105 $ ?
B-2
-------
GENERAL AGENCY DATA AND STATISTICS SHEET FOR 1988 JOINT STAPPA/ALAPCO
PROJECT TO IDENTIFY STATE/LOCAL PROGRAM ACTIVITIES AND COSTS
0 General Demographic Information
. <
- Population
• Land Area
Year:
- # MSA's <250K Population*
- * MSA's 250K - 1 M Population*"
- f MSA's >1M Population*
General Source Information
- I Class A SIP, NSPS, Nontransitory NESHAPS Sources Regulated
• f Class B SIP Sources Federally Regulated ~~"
- # Transitory NESHAPS Sources Regulated —
- I Sources Regulated by S/L but No Federal co-enforcement Responsibility
- f Motor Vehicles Registered
9 General Air Pollution Problem Information
- # Counties Nonattainment for 03
-. Population Residing in 03 Nonattainment Counties
- # Counties Nonattainment for CO
- Population Residing in CO Nonattainment Counties
- I Counties Identified as Group I for
- Population Residing in PMio Group I Counties
•
- t Counties Identified as Group II for
- f Counties Nonattainment for $03
- # Class I Visibility Areas '
*MSA - Metropolitan Statistical Areas as defined by the Bureau of Census, U. S.
Department of Commerce. '
NOTE: Data on this page should not duplicate any data provided by another direct
grant recipient also completing a survey form.
B-3
-------
INSTRUCTION SHEET FOR 1988 JOINT STATE/LOCAL-EPA PROJECT TO IDENTIFY
STATE/LOCAL PROGRAM ACTIVITIES AND COSTS
The purpose of this project is to better define and quantify the air activities
performed by State and local agencies and their cost.
e The information and data will help us to convince others of the value of air
grants, to define and defend critical elements of the control program, to
better understand the impact of new programs, to find meaningful disinvestments
and to improve negotiations. '
0 The requested workload and resource data should be provided for each listed
activity. The workload entry should be expressed in the units identified
within the "Units" column and represent the work accomplished or expected to
be acccomplished during the twelve month period addressed by the analysis.
0 In those cases where no "Units" have been identified for a specific activity
an entry should still be made in the "Magnitude" column and the measures or '
units employed described in either the "Units" column or the "Comments" column.
0 Only where the agency has no workload for a specific activity, should a "zero"
be placed into the "Magnitude" and "Resource" columns. Where a workload exists
but data on activity levels or resource expenditures is not available or
indeterminate, estimated data should still be entered into the appropriate
"Magnitude" and "Resource" columns. Any information, estimates, or sense of
activity or resource utilization is preferable to no entry. Notations
concerning the highly speculative nature of such estimates can be made in
the "Comments" column.
0 Resource entries for the "Workyears" column should be provided to the
nearest.tenth of a workyear. Entries for the "Capital Equipment", "Other
Expenditure", and "Total Expenditure" columns should be provided to the nearest
hundred dollars expressed as thousands (e.g., $4.2 K).
0 Resource entries for the "Other Expenditures" column should include expenses
for temporary employees, contractor costs, and cooperative agreements with
other (generally non-air) agencies. Indicate in the "Comments" column some
examples of the type of expenditures that are included. This column is basically
for miscellaneous expenditures which "don't fit" elsewhere and should not be
used as a total or subtotal column.
Collectively the resource columns (i.e, workyears converted to dollars, capital
equipment, and other expenditures) should add up to the total State or local
air program. A comparison should be made against grant data identified on
the grant agreement or financial status reports to ensure the full Section 105
program (i.e., grant monies and non-federal matching monies) have been included
in the total program display.
B-4
-------
In those cases where a State passes air grant monies onto a local agency (OP
agencies) to perform specific tasks and activities for the State air program
(or where the State uses all or a portion of a local agency's non-federal
expenditures as part of the State non-federal match), the grant resources
being "passed-through" (or the local non-federal monies being credited) as
well as the specific tasks they support should be integrated and accounted-for
within the State completed survey form.
e In States where one or more local agencies receive direct grant funding from
EPA, the local agencies will receive a survey form directly from the EPA
Regional Office for completion and return to the Region. The local agencies
are requested to provide the State with a copy of the completed draft survey
form at the same time the draft is sent to the EPA Regional Office. The State
is requested to review the local agency's completed survey form and advise the
EPA Region of any questions or comments the State may have concerning the local
agency draft. In reviewing the local submission, the State should check to see
that the information and data is consistent with that of the State and that no
duplication (as reasonably as possible) exists.
0 Where an agency charges indirect costs to the 105 program, the dollar value
identified for the indirect costs on the survey form should be converted
to a workyear equivalent entering this workyear value into the "Workyears
Expended" column of the "Indirect Cost" entry within the "Administration"
category.
0 Entries for Class B sources should include only SIP sources whose actual or
potential emissions are less than 100 tons/year.
B-5
-------
1
2
sas
I
1
*
a
s
§i
&
=
\
. iaas
I
s
M
M
M
|
i
5
S
H
|
S
iiilifiii
s
=2?
S
B-6
-------
1
{3
iif
533
ass
sa
II
III
ill
a a a
il
si!
i!
a
s s a
i
! = 5
ssisilii |s;iii
i
is s
JLI
J2| 1
a .0 s <3
«?l s
III l|i
f ~ -s _ -I -s:?
|-=f i
!{i!
i*iiJi]
rf-i
ri
-------
I
I
tt
i
E
S
S
si
ii
S 3
£i
i
£<
SI
\ u< S
S S
i i
i i
i i
» H
S S 5 S
llli
ili
ii
II
11
11
5 3
II
ii
isiiiillli;
3 3 3 oi <
! as is.
I
ill
.s-s
a s
i*
**=
Jllljlli
I*?
a
*
iui
|f?l
§9^ii
* *
l
it
til
i
i
m
i
ilii
1«1 3
I *a|
lj^«
aflipi
£•
S
I
2
« Si:
f<3 a — ~ i2 • S *
Iliii^lilil
= s-p
ill.
§^-
'Is
I-
gl
ri»
B-8
-------
I
I
I
I I
I?
ill
II
s -a
AS!
If
I 2
cm * V ~ •&
Ills II.
!i!i!! ij
*3s5s5uJE..
-jj-5-a'5-2S— G
||||1||||||1
gJSiJ^^J
~g*Siv^i3iSi3i3«
|
2=1- t'afi
lifll
i
ll
-P1
e li
S
B-9
-------
I
I
is
i -ii
JL a a s SB 1 J.
8 8
I
Ii
§5
§1
B-10
-------
-------
APPENDIX C
Additional Tables
-------
-------
APPENDIX C-l
Summary Reports of All Fields
By U.S. EPA Region
-------
-------
•~
^
£
•S
a
W
9 -
^
nM o
5««
>> >.
r = «a .s .ass .s
.ss . .s . as
3 = S
aaa
.as asas ssaasa a as
»
J
a s.
il 5
- - - - -"*-^ "*»*
IS
o
~s
-S-S-^S-S-S- .=-=.=. ==.*.= =
.s.saaas
sa
aas
"a's's
a
s
Sa»
s
= «
in
~~^^~i~~^^^^^^ • • ••••»i*za*=iii.s!
22 S S S S S S S S S SS S S g'jg'Jj'Jg_:^jj^8«S"S^ST5^S^Si
V4»««»V«4»4JM««*«a«u2i2;7:=S^V*^& * ^ •• •• ^ <
ss2s u
ijL£ji££ji3i5lsiSS----:-;^
5'|t&SSttt5._i^ijj4j^
^^ • « • • " " « • <» « .
2
Ss<:
a
ll
C-3
-------
: S
1 *Sf 22 .JSS* • • • -2!}2222222 -2 *. '.« .as
2 _
I
gj§ . . . .^ ssssssss
«|S * *-»--«- S
||f ^2 ^
sJI 22 -2222 ^s?~s?""r~"!s
^5 s^ .ssss sss
•3^
TU"^
1? -I
•sx
S"3^ •!«.'«.„.«" B2 S ^asSSSs3"® § asi
1^1 I si lii in
s
1
- •* -=
5a-| g 5s
— — i ^ . _ S X," s
«• — •">.— s a-i s £ S
T2"2^B a =•!; ~?S
:^^:^slil g!i|ss!S
!=:fffli=lJsJII|3fli
j.i-i«.it5 5 3 «•«• — •••• w MI
. C-4
-------
a
.3
S
-A*
-SS3
ta
I I
5 S
l i
S
=
•s s
ill
1
!=
C-5
-------
I
i
•«
£
•L *• "* *A **^ ^™
S
Ss sss .ss .ssssssss .ssssss ss s
^ sss .= -,_a^3 ^..g. .^ ^
I •• — ••• — «. — •••••••••»•.„»_._.».»._...-_.
S.S. Ss
5S2 -55 -2252^2:5 • • -S25555S5I22 - • -555555523'"^ .ssssssal
| II
1 liiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii ikss===5=g§Hssi»§gi
C-6
-------
Jf ^ — —••» «•» _• «• _. _ w ^ _. M
a s
c -sSa ~ .saasasa . .aaaaaassaaaaaassa as: aasas
2|S s S3saa=" S=aa5;
A
*•
°|1 S sasa - ^ -^
1 —- -- — — ..-.
ija * . .s * a a
Jg ».„„„._.«.._„».„„__„„_„„„„_„_.._
?ll S -2S* •*••* • -555f52S55f2f2"5* -55 • • -55?s-5 .~s. .!~"s.3';
I
4>
•32 2! ^"55 * ** SS5S ***S5S** **»^«»«-»^** w* W •WW*Mw«*^M*W*«»«-»t**'w^
£ 3 ZS M S S**S «• ^« ^ "• «• «• o a* a»
.. .' - . - -
J"« ^ ________«9«/a«is _^.
sas fia s
JJ S^5 SSSssSSSaaalsa Jll I
• SB S B^-SS----
-'—*-««»wnfc.^*3 . . . .
-------
SSS 3SSS3SS3
•3 SSS3SS3
'
SSSS SSSSS3S3
~-~~ 'ss--"-as
•*•««
•* fc*
II
JS
^
I
II
2i
ill
I
is
1,11
C-8
-------
5
_y
5
J
2t
3 |
II
i
^rs
S1S
krt
"
If
55
:s=i-sa '-ssss's^ -n22~
sssss
'
illiiil
s s
J
-1 ||f"
C-9
-------
I
5=
X
PI
•*
i= sssssssssssssss sssss
'
ass
is
Ss
sa^aacs geee^
SSs - gag
£11
s
5 i
si
il
1*
-«3£
I ?
. .3
-s
fil
—• w»
3 3
• C-10
-------
s
I
•=Is
sls
ss
'2 =
ss
s s
is
i
:s s
11
«*-«2 »•••«*«••
ssss s:
ss 's:
II
i
^
S If
sT s 5 s
Ǥs 111
-
g""
II
fls.fi-
,
-------
I
2
11
21
ii
T£ SB Z £± S SS S !2 & ZS S S £S E* *•? ^g?—^^^^^ — — ^^^^<"^^^^^^**™^*^**^^"^**M**»^»^>**M»*"**^~•>^^OB*^
^ iS SI 53 53 «•» 55 S S ?S ?« »• SS 3 S 3 35 53 3 «S *g^ggg<»^g»^»«^ggj^^^^<»»»^<»q»«»^««<»»<^^«x^<(p
**
I ,.
111 PS ' "2
a sasa a s
'= ' 's'a'a's: 's ' —
•ass
' 2S 25 25 £M 25 *** ^* ** $S 2 ^* « •>« ^5 S ** 2K JS S2 Z5 «S ™— ** *** *^ ***'
•£ .sssaassssssaaassssaassassssssaa ssssssssssssssssss
12 ii
issaa
•a
„,! i^s iiiiiiiiii i
aH!5«!»'"rJ« »?»;»r«r«r??CSCCv»?!'
^S • ^i ^T ^i ^T ^i ^i ^i ^T ^i ^i ^i ^T ^i ^i ^i ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
C-12
-------
^
47
5
s.
27:
-= s
JJ
•i S2 IS **22 S *
' M» M ^ ** *• •** *• ~• '
2_ ;„,._,.__.„,„_,..„
•358 ^*-T-s. = « = T~ = *~r~« = TS~.3TS = = SSSS = !=SS28SS32SSSs:S3SSS =
2|S =Sss5aa'"Sj:S:=as555 = 555S5S"':sss = 5: = '5-«as25»S"isi~'a5a = ssss
ill 552 -22
as sss
3li .= ..«
31S
2S s as a:
'"S '«••
.- 4
-------
£
________
5x5 ••srs
» 3 ~ •
§
-S
II
a! ii
•s s
il S
G-14
-------
2-
•3 S
JJ
J .,
1^52 SS*»3**S! £» S 2 *5 S Si
I M <•» •••«•»• vrtvrt «K^ «• •• «•« •
s s
«* !S «S
J
« -2
S
.sssssssssssssssssssss
•ss
issssssss
sssssssssssss;
""s"**"3
-s
i^i
a sa
iillililllilililllsll|i§====
illliiillillilillillliiliiii
iiiiiiiii
«/a t/a t/a c/a c/3 m us «/a c/a c,a »•
-------
«*
— Is KssssssssssKssisssjSssassssss s .ss ssssss ssssss!
sis =s.s. .s. . . .s . . .ss sssss ss ss ss s s ss
gs= "-a s s ss s---- •-•- -^ -s --j • • -5 -J525
S SS ^ "* ** ZS
fit
sis =. - . . .s s sss ss s
l|l " s 2 - = J -=- •- '
•S£ SSSSSSSSSSSSSSS .SSSS .SSSSSSS .SS .SSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
I fl =Z"IS"S5'S"SS Siss =" "c rf-——i—i-i
Icl Illllllliilllli liiiiliS iii
i
^i a 1
•s s !•§ •_ •3^3! . ^-3.
it 'S3 2? •" ~ S "3 S S 3 w«S
1*1
C-16
-------
J
f
Ifl iiiisii^SSjjjj
_
-== 5S
S3
II =1
-a
II
3
.
5 _::m ss
|
« _- w *S •» "* C
r.-t?
-------
s
3!= SSSS^w^S^^^^^SS' •^S.^^^~r~~»s.rr3> ."rrS.sssj'SSr'S.rrSSs:
rfS "S «i 35 S *™ S ** ^* 53Z53*"**3f"'!325w* ***2**^***^55U2 ££ ** ~ S *** 2 2*^^*2**** u»«««»^»^^»<»«ii«Sl555!
1* '™—' **• «-w«^«^ «• ««« r^ •• 00r
|
J
8
^jss 2 s- • -s-s- -rs. .=. .~ .r .»
"— ^i • «••• ^ ^* 55 ^5 SS ^* *** —*
S --..-..---....-.....-...«
i •-'
•s-a 2
2^2
= -a
v* ••
g
??<& _ V» S €** *^ *^
II . - a
5 1 2s=S
JJ 3°£ lllllllllliliiiliil
^i • —* —• ^» ^i ^i ^i ^i ^i ^i ^T ^T ^1 ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^* ^* *^ ™*
O18
-------
er
i
I:
2:
if
j _
•as sssssss
"" =55=5=-=!
s
g
ll
:•= -.
II-
s
f
W9
S
g f ss||||| ||| *|j ,
,t3!|!| -—«•«• «-^ s's'sJ 2£3Jc.s^§
||JI Ill^llllllsiilpfll
!Ji?1115I-:-:-:-!
C-19
-------
s
3
i i*~* ""* s
5
A
3 Is S S s S5 s s 5 Sss
SiS ««.
5 I lisli
"" " —-«•«-— ggsgg
it
•32 .
4»
,Ji
lilil-
,
i — ^;——-:« .H•?«»• —S
ss=s;
C-20
-------
3
^! S
5- s
» 3, to
^!
-------
JS
J
Ill
SSISSSSSSI -l§^55§§rl -5*5§^? •§ -~ .s
3.
Is
*2
If
%*
= sssssssssssssss ssss
sssss
•
ISSS 33:
i^f lltlSiiiislilii
— "• •• •" "• "*^ «" •-».•«•« 4 » u « u>
-------
s
s = ss
J:
-s ss
Hi
-
I!
? i
r
-------
•s
SI
I
JS 13
«•«•»•«•
I M M M M M 3 M» ^
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
ifffffffffllWI^W^WjiSSljJJJ* Hllllllllf 1222222
*»* 22 «S •£ .jg _JP _*g jg j> 4* «> ^p jp «• «• 4g 4* 49 «p « « "3 T5 ** ^5 S «i3 •S ^5 «• ?£» ^5 «5 £• MB uE uS •£ UB u! MB MB ul HB ^5 ^5 >S *S «S J5 •£• «S
*2 ^9 ••* •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• •• Hi •• Ml Ml •• •• Ml ^B Ml Ml ^> ^ Ate ^M ^fl
-------
S5S
'SSS
S
3
'ss
3 Is sssssasssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssg
gs
e
<%
is
S~ 51
II II
:ss sss s
.
==S=is=l§IIiS
. 2-3 = -
. s
= . §
I *
S
s
£i^f
llff
S -.S s
S3 " "3 S
-^ «*««o« s* ~"
s 2 • a-3~sr l|l s|
? s_ sssaJI- sl-s ^|
o *••- •_:'---«_'2?T«o 133
•S »
^fs
rls
-a
|a
« M
-- «J^ W-2 -f-33
"-
is
2
"||I Sill
II s:
ssssass^ij==-^^ = =- =
^^^T2^ . ^ _ _ _ . _ ^•»_*_3t
"
»««
--"asS
L~T ftSSftftft""*"""
"OO W*V*U*IA«J*V»SSSSS
!«A
-------
s = r~ = «ss
21s ==225S=- -=52
II
ssssssss s ss
' ''
33s
III
IS S SS
S SS:
II
2e
11
s- »5
I ===== § sis
£f 11111= i 111
•ss
C-26
-------
I
«»
I
II
2
3
S
== --
.3 sssassssssssss ssssssssa ssssssassssss s
s sa-sssssssass- 'sss
S SSS S
'si '^s- 's
i
.Sr^S. S
ss s a s
s ss ss
•Si S
|£ S ^ ^ 2 S S .SSSSSSSSS3SSSS SSSSSSSSS- SSSS52SSSSSSSSS
-j « a-s-=a~=a-=s sa|
i tn u» us «/»
iillliilli
•ass
lillli-iiliillii
-------
s
^«
tr
.3
I
ll
i
I!
ii
,1= - •
255 *" "" 3» S3 S "• •* SS !5 "" S5 5 S5 "* S 5**S!3 ~ ^ ** * "* *~ «3 3 •• S S! 2 5 S ** S SS:
I ——-------.----. ........ . ..
Ml
sis =. a ass ... . ~
«M -^ ^* MM *••••••»••••«.. . ••••••••«.., ^^ ** ^* ^* ** «
^
| .....
M
3ls . . .~ .=. sss
I|I -' 3E s»-
||| 1 .|||5|2 = s .||ssssI52 .Sssss .55 .sss = = s = = 5ssis 1Ss
s s
&s.
SisS Uli
a« IB MM a* <3 V3
C-28
-------
j-^ - s
51
u
ll
S— MM»«..»n.M,M,.^
£•— _ _ _ 2
»d
I
sfl ss =s 5
33s 2
515 §
**
PI l=||j!S!!!5!l
""" *»
k*
^ «-»-^-w-^»*^r^^^>^»^*T^i»*^
|| ssaass sS-SS
3 S
•s
I53SX
_
ijl
II
5l
ill =
s
- =
9 32
-^« & mm o-«<^ A i
2ss32
-------
V
a - - - „—„
•s
,s
55
~ jit" f?5!:i55-^^^^^^!^-^*5—*3^"!^!
S|5 S -=-~= - «•„_-.
- S —
•s ,s s ~ ~ ~ s. s! .~:?~~*r"::?s;!s~*ss3sa »sS522 2 .2 = 252222222 ssssa
*" "~ S"~~— • — "•'— — — — • — — — — -•» — — _.•__. — • .. -^i.i.jw.;-;^^.^ •~-«™=;
=1 !
S£ •• «, S. S >3 s: % S >3«>S !3 >3 >S
"S tS£!SSS « :S3K£3 — — SSS 2"* "* «• "»«••«"« S «» 22S2222222 S
2 I 2|||||g||§||||||||H|eee===:2 222SSS2H2SS2iISsgi
f££ IHIIillllillll-illllliiiiiii illlilliiiiiiiiiii
. ST
im~S . o S £ S
•-• -as-«
'as a-a
• «I9 3 tS M «/B
S'S'S'H'S'S'S'S'S'S'S'S'S'S'S'S'S'S'S'S'S'Sll^S — — "5222^
C-30
-------
&
i
^
=
l»
-ss -:
III!
V
•352 ««»«>«»««».»»«««^«w«»««i» — »i«;««-;™—;r!.^ '«:.«: ^ _; _: ^: _: ._ • • ~ • ~ " — — —:—: —: ~ ~ ~ ™
J> TJ ;j — «• «•• >_•«•••«»•»« r.MjjSSx>S53SS^SC ~SS™5SSJ32S!SJ5S2SS2S
S
5 s
|§ l552S * • •
**~'>" •— »•
- s
II
- 2
•as. s«
•SS-S S . S^!.
=i?|l |U ^H
' j
.ll
S 3
5|
O «•
-S
C-31
-------
s
I
Is
f t
It
-=
il
z csssssss
-
ss cssssssssssss
3s ^-S.rr-"'. .* . = 3
•
•»
i* =s.ss
«
- = ~==S
3=1 giii
i
3 i
ill -
= =
ll
£ S3
C-32
-------
APPENDIX C-2
Summary Reports of Criteria Pollutant Monitoring
By U.S. EPA Region
C-33
-------
-------
Summary Report of Criteria Pollutant Monitoring
by EPA region
9:09 Wednesday, February 14, 1£
Criteria Pollutant=Total Suspended Particulates
EPA
Region
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
Number
of
Monitors
52.0
131.0
184.0
493.0
298.0
129.0
101.0
108.0
71.0
148.0
Total
Expenditures
($1000)
323.90
462.36
483.50
1932.21
828.83
350.82
287.56
288.70
54.00
526.99
Cost Per
Monitor
($/monitor)
6228.85
3529.47
2627.72
3919.29
2781.31
2719.53
2847.18
2673.15
760.56
3560.72
C-34
-------
Summary Report of Criteria Pollutant Monitoring
by EPA region
9:09 Wednesday, February 14, 1|
Criteria Pollutant=Sulfur Dioxide (S02)
EPA
Region
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
Number
of
Monitors
27.0
49.0
67.0
83.0
80.0
21.0
33.0
22.0
32.0
27.0
Total
Expenditures
($1000)
329.00
533.74
612.70
1236.59
713.90
375.86
184.73
224.30
22.50
207.71
Cost Per
Monitor
($/monitor)
12185.19
10892.65
9144.78
14898.67
8923.75
17898.10
5598.03
10195.45
703.12
7692.96
C-35
-------
Summary Report of Criteria Pollutant Monitoring
by EPA region
9:09 Wednesday, February 14,
Criteria Follutant=FM-10
EPA
Region
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VJII.
IX
X
Number
of
Monitors
13.0
34.0
35.0
81.0
97.0
27.0
49.0
88.0
45.0
78.0
Total
Expenditures
($1000)
134.30
279.10
354.90
394.12
388.66
214.20
156.79
278.90
61.65
395.56
Cost Per
Monitor
($/monitor)
10330.77
8208.82
10140.00
4865.68
4006.80
7933.33
3199.80
3169.32
1370.00
5071.25
-------
Summary Report of Criteria Pollutant Monitoring
by EPA region
9:09 Wednesday, February 14,
Criteria Pollutant=0zone (03)
EPA
Region
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
Number
of
Monitors
16.6
35.0
60.0
111.0
88.0
28.0
32.0
19.0
74.0
12.0
Total
Expenditures
($1000)
238.00
345.36
403.30
1357.54
732.40
467.92
247.08
157.90
142.55
127.70
Cost Per
Monitor
($/monitor)
14875.00
9867.43
6721.67
12230.09
8322.73
16711.43
7721.25
8310.53
1926.35
10641.50
. C-37
-------
Summary Report of Criteria Pollutant Monitoring
by EPA region
9:09 Wednesday, February 14,
Criteria Pollutant=Nitrogen Dioxide (N02)
EPA
Region
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
Number
of
Monitors
5.0
14.0
32.0
26.0
19.0
12.0
15.0
17.0
40.0
2.0
Total
Expenditures
($1000)
62.00
405.56
240.20
383.33
273.33
302.34
162.98
107.40
44. 05
37.60
Cost Per
Monitor
($/monitor)
12400.00
28968.57
7506.25
14743.46
14385.79
25195.00
10865.33
6317.65
1101.25
18800.00
-------
Summary Report of Criteria Pollutant Monitoring
by EPA region
9:09 Wednesday, February 14, i|
Criteria Pollutant=Carbon Monoxide (CO)
EPA
Region
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
Number
of
Monitors
5.0
29.0
42.0
63.3
41.0
18.0
26.0
23.0
67.0
30.0
Total
Expenditures
($1000)
92.60
250.46
341.00
790.44
303.41
305.40
192.68
247.50
148.55
403.17
Cost Per
Monitor
($/monitor)
18520.00
8636.55
8119.05
12487.20
7400.24
16966.67
7410.77
10760.87
2217.16
13438.93
C-39
-------
Summary Report of Criteria Pollutant Monitoring
by EPA region
9:09 Wednesday, February 14, IS
Criteria Pollutant=Lead (Pb)
EPA
Region
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
Number
of
Monitors
56.0
26.0
56.0
96.0
68.0
66.0
23.0
18.0
52.0
21.0
Total
Expenditures
($1000)
56.00
251.40
225.10
254.60
135.36
137.06
90.23
44.40
30.40
65.14
Cost Per
Monitor
($/monitor)
1000.00
9669.23
4019.64
2652.08
1990.59
2076.67
3923.04
2466.67
584.62
3102.08
-------
-------
APPENDIX C-3
Summary Results
Monitoring Expenditures
By U.S. EPA Region
C-41
-------
-------
a
4»
|
3
* *» » •«•«» ^ ^ A «» • ^ M ^
3 S -tl ^ WOTW* ^ «MO»«V «• *• ^ «5
|j£5 =2= 3 ==« a ss s
III
S SSS .3 .SS3 .3 .3S . .S
ss
sa
** M -*M
^•a-a
3S =
S.
a
Is
s»
||| HI | §11 | || | || HI
» 2i"S 25 3 53 M
' •* 3f ** *••
ssa
1
J
!
1
J
o
f a^g a^
s
«
_ s
2 5
C-42
-------
===========
JsSI as .=.5= .aaasss
« M
-------
r
1
J 3
st
B
5:
~ 1'
111 2§l?§ -IS!!?!?!!!!! -f2^5-^2.^
a""-* *"" ~--~«~
49
||| ..
-5 S
w
3s|s *«s
^
I i i = { i y i
ii!iiinisiiiil!!!ii!iijjliiij
~«~~^«^i^----- « = s = CC^S5f-s-fiisi
~~ssssaSsSsssssssz '
isiiiiiiissiisi
Illillllllllil!
s ss jt £ s s jt s a a s x S 3
-------
- —
I-
•> *!• O ktf» *» «• M* •* M* •^
JLS
3 =
SS
— w» ^ «•» —< «• ^
««• *<» •» •• — «*• ^ •
«• •• ?•• -^ «•«•«•
'•• M* «• «*4 «^ r* »• »—
•^V»^«*«M^w>««i
CS«3^S2!SS£SSS»M»
« «• —•«VW*M*V«Sw»^W»-5
^^2
s s —
III
Hi l
C-45
-------
Ia.-ss "^"r5? .s. ~.s. ~~ .ssassssaassassassa
sir "IS SS2SC sg^ss ss'-ssssasrsssssssss*
|||s = = = = = .SSssS = = = i = = = = = S = = = = = = =
= *fs ~-=s = = -a- = ~ as —- —a-aas =
^"25 ^^*? .T^ . ^ ^? ^ *• *• ,T* .**^**?*?**^*?"?»'-S535s2
«
5J|| ss2'5;= 'ss-55 '=5^52^-5=555=555^
2
1 5.2!
J -a «> «
3
S
s m r s
ft in ssis-
Ij
5
3 -a s=5s s-!*=.s.:;- ."ssss ssssssssssssassss
™ 2.S"3;; iS-5H s5-ss 3 = *" = sssssss3s = 3 = -'
g«
wa
I I I.I I I • .
ill
ili
'' ;«•
i • • •
• «M 4M •
I
2 Illllllliiiiiiiiiiiiillp5:"11
s 222522a222£2222i22222Iils32isiI
I d^drjidd^sdijdrjdddi^::::^-^^'1^
-------
i
i
s
Jill =============== ==============
£*js a-as-s-ss S5~-S5a=
"SS-2 «p *» •<• 'SSS2S jj Z S "* ' «• »-i ' 'jjjjj<>Ma>«is
S S S SS S S S! X S S S S S S S S S S C S S C S 3> SS S 3 S
** ^? £.**
S
!
I ill —
B j, -. «~ -
! ! ! ^ j = f.l
s? o o • « *• £ -2 o S
| | | 1 | | jff ;|3^^
iii^iiilfsisiaiP^Milii iiillll
„•:::•= £3! rxxz.
,^-sf-- sSs*5
"! J J'
Jjj;
IIIIIIlIIIIIIIIIIIIllss|**3Ssss
-------
B
I
**
2 a
i-s
sjs 5s. "rs.rrs.s.s.sassasssasasrjssaasaaa
:ass
: •" "~ •*»*»™^^"«*»«»*"<»^w»»» •• «» ^ • «M «^ «^
• — #* 53
!===S==2==55S2=5==5
^^ » — «5 ~-i ~«a — — s**ss**™s-*2~'*2s«!aa«»«N«
Ills
1"
-s5
J1-l
5 "
5:
i,
|S|= sSs:55=i555|55|s5i55i535355!
| | j | ] ! ||J si
^Mflflf!
Ill1:?15i^
.•^.^^^•s-s-ss:^^
s s s j; s s^"*- s s
« »>BddldA«fai^d:^2^£^^^^22^2J--~-^?tf^^^
-------
f
Ills ISSWWIMaa.MMMUmmi
s-3!- -aa—•-— -----a--a----^5i-:w^^..;s
s s= 'ssssssssssssssss
AS
It
I-
ill
C-49
-------
s
1
™ J
1*
Xs
•s
S3=S =3SSSSSSS
s .25552=125
3— s 3 s s a s cs
ll lliiilllliilli illllli
' ' "
—• «3 S3 o CA .2 «» « «S 8 t3
«m^««AHiu.. S —
•S'S'S-S'S'S'S-s-a'-s-S-S-S-S-S-S-SS-STS-"* *• - S^5555
s ziSSSStSSslllIIiiiisii--3""^-3-3-3-3
-------
sssssasss-sssass-sssscssss
• «3^^ M
BSv7S3.7a.aJ . . ."•"• 5 S-S 3 S S S S
>.» a *•.• o «.• » «.— •-• "i^iics-rJ-ijr5
~~~~~~...... -- « -— "r-r-r-s-s-s s s -~T5———s
____
C-51
-------
APPENDIX C-4
Summary of Main Activities
By U.S. EPA Region
-------
-------
Saiiary Results of Percent of Total Kxpeditures for each Actinty
by region
Grantee Actinty
I. AHBIilT HOHTORIIG.
II. STATIOIABT SOOECI COHPLIA8C8
III. IEH Src. 8ITIKM/P8RIITTIIG
IT. SIP i KKGDLATIOI D8T8LOP88IT AID Adopt.
T. All TOXICS
TI. ADSIHSTIATI0I
Til. OTBSi STATK/LOCAL ACTITIT1S
Till. 80I-S8CTI08 105 ACTIVITIES
BK6IOI=I
dtiiber
Agencies Hean Standard Uininun
Besponding Percent DeTiation Percent
Haziiu
Percent
27.6947
18.4034
11.1218
12.5155
5.2963
13.9168
7.3475
9.2602
4.3329
8.4972
6.2604
11.6814
4.3652
9.4124
3.9657
1.0850
22.7564
8.2440
3.1701
3.7033
0.9861
0.4827
2.0610
3.4930
33.8728
25.0704
20.6099
31.7468
10.0275
24.9074
12.2876
10.8275
-------
Suiury ieaalta of Percent of Total Ixpediturea for sack Actiiitj
by region
Grutee Activity
I. AHBIIIT HOIITOBIiG.
II. STiTIOIiET SOOECI COHPLIAICI
III. m Src. ilTIW/PIMIITIIG
IT. SIP i I1GBIATIOI D8T1LOPHIIT AID Adopt.
T. &IR TOXICS
TI. iDHIHSTB&TIOI
Til. OTHER STiTE/LOCAL ACTITITSS
Till. IOI-S1CIIOI 105 iCTITITHS
BgGIOI=II
Iniber
igeaeies Hean Standard Biniiui
Respoadini Percent Deviation Percent
19.7443
36,9377
12.7393
5.5354
2.5317
15.4893
14.7196
8.7371
18.1580
15.7079
8.4987
1.6731
1.8237
12.4099
6.3855
8.4912
1.3450
20.5993
6.7298
3.8462
0.6930
0.4261
6.9348
2.7329
Saziiui
Percent
44.6733
51.9487
18.7487
7.1918
4.3401
25.7436
20.0112
14.7413
C-54
-------
Smiary ieaults of Percent of Total Expeditam for each Actirity
by region
Grantee Activity
I. AHBIEIT KOIITORII6.
II. STATIOUI! SOOiCE COBPLIAHCE
III. 8EN Src. iEflEH/PEIHTYHG
If. SIP i 8EGDLATIOS DIVKLOPHI8T AID Adopt.
Y. AH TOIICS
TI. ADHimSTBATIOM
?II. OTHER STATS/LOCAL ACTIVITY
fill. 801-SECTIOI 105 ACTIflTIES
- KB(IlUl=iii -
luber
Ageacies
Responding
7
7
7
7
6
7
7
3
Hean
Percent
33.4628
24.2985
4.9608
8.1579
2.2979
24.4815
2.1795
1.1421
Standard
Deflation
16.9122
3.8955
3.3657
6.7639
2.5619
17.5231
1.7985
1.1311
Hinim
Percent
19.8283
17.9911
0.2882
1.8735
0.5765
2.0225
0.1561
0.1761
Hanim
Percent
69.3553
31.3035
10.4876
20.9151
7.0964
48.1101
4.8552
2.3863
-------
Suury Results of Percent of Total hpeditnres for each Actirity
by regioi
Gmtee Activity
L AHBIIIT HOIITOEII6.
II. ST4TIOIARI SOORG! COBPLIAICI
III. IN Src. RITIH/PIIHITTII6
IT. SIP i BIGOL4TIOI DITILOPBIII AID Adopt.
T. All TOXICS
TI. 4DBIIISTEATIOI
Til. OTHI8 STATI/LOCAt ACTIfITIS
Till. HOI-SECTIOI 105 ACTIVITIES
REGIOI:!?
Umber
Agencies Heaa Standard
Responding Percent Deflation
22
22
22
22
22
22
20
11
Hiniioi
Percent
Haxiiai
Percent
28.8439
30.8929
5.4331
5.2084
2.3595
17.4956
4.3016
11.7122
12.5240
10.9126
3.9272
2.8418
1.8083
10.5783
4.8980
10.9231
9.6005
11.5735
0.7721
0.7274
0.5063
0.5650
0.0951
0.1836
52.0826
55.6287
15.5375
11.1732
5.8438
39.2464
19.3977
29.1552
056
-------
Sonar; Results of Percent of Total Expeditures for each Activity
by region
REGION?
Graatee Activity
I. AHBIEMT 80IITORIMG.
II. STaTIOMaE! SOURCE COBPLIAHCI
III. m Src. ESTIKH/PiiBITTIIG
IT. SIP i REGULATIOI DEYEIOPBEBT AID Adopt.
?. All TOIICS
?I. ADHIIST8ATIOI
711. OTHEE STATE/LOCAL ACTHITES
HI!. 801-SSCIIOI 105 ACTITITIES
Iniber
Aieacies Sean Standard Hiaiiut
EespODdinf Percent Deviation Percent
10
10
9
9
9
9
Haxiini
Percent
22.5463
35.6241
9.9806
6.4659
3.2745
17.T635
3.7166
25.6013
7.2670
12.5084
6.2160
6.8341
2.7118
8.5221
5.0287
34.5549
10.3951
15.5364
1.7093
0.8827
0.3554
5.8310
0.5823
1.1673
34.1556
53.1517
20.6527
23.5495
8.8954
34.7390
15.5802
50.9354
C-S7
-------
Sonary Results of Percent of Total Expeditares for each Activity
by region
Grantee Activity
I. 4BBI1IT HOIITOBIK.
II. STATIOIABT SOOEC! COBPLIAICE
III. IN Src. BETIEB/PEBBITTII6
IT. SIP i EIGOLATIOI DlflLOPHHT AID Adopt.
T. All TOXICS
TI. AMIIISTBATIOI
TIL OTilB STATE/LOCAL ACTITITES
Till. HOI-SECTIOi 105 ACTIVITIES
SEGIOI=TI
Vaib«r
Agencies Heaa Standard Hiniiai
Eesponding Percent Deviation Percent
8
32.5092
36.5938
8.7633
7.6661
1.9436
13.7427
5.2889
0.1506
13.9096
10.6767
7.3910
6.2185
1.9395
7.5216
2.2148
0.2130
13.3610
19.1542
0.5852
0.3696
2.0376
1.7455
0.0000
Usiiiai
Percent
54.7561
54.2070
19.1724
15.4392
4.3813
22.6516
7.1363
0.3012
C.-58
-------
Stuury Results of Percent of Total Expeditares for each Activity
by region
Grantee Actifity
I. ABBIB1T HOIITORIIG.
II. STATIOHi! SOOICE COBPHAIICE
III. m Src. HE7IEH/PEHBITTIIG
I?. SIP 1 RSGOIATIOI DEfELOPBEIT AMD Adopt.
7. ill TOXICS
71. ADHISIST8ATIOI
711. OTHii STATE/LOCAL ACTI7ITES
Till. gOI-SECTIOI 105 ACTIVITIES
• aa«ivu-iii -
Umber
Agencies
Bespondinf
9
9
7
7
9
9
8
i
Bean
Percent
30.1115
31.4629
4.7696
5.9683
4.7033
21.5406
3.3701
7.5100
Standard
Deviation
12.9545
15.5168
3.2256
3.5882
6.4464
7.2785
3.3720
,
Hiniiui
Percent
12.9990
15,2714
1.4886
1.7407
0.0750
8.8776
1.2382
7.5100
Baxiiui
Percent
53.0359
62.3490
11.1194
11.3078
21.0212
32.6377
10.9295
7.5100
-------
Snuary Results of Percent of Total Ixpeditares for each activity
by region
Grutee actiiity
I. iBBIIIT HOBITOBIHG.
II. ST4TI01IB! SOOICZ COBPLI4ICI
III. IN Src. BITIM/PIBIIIITII6
IT. SIF i 11GBUIIOI D1TILOPHIIT AID Adopt.
?. ill TOXICS
II. AD8IIIST8ATIOI
Til. OTIIR STATI/LOCAL ACT17ITIS
Till. IOI-SICTIOI 195 ACTITITIIS
!K6IOI=TIII
Iniber
ige&cies Bean Standard Uiniiui
Bespondini Percent Deflation Percent
28.5001
25.9514
10.2760
9.7913
4.1949
10.7946
10.8140
2.9603
11.5896
13.3221
8.2939
10.3470
5.6627
2.9245
11.3080
1.5315
6.2177
3.0460
1.8864
2.4441
1.0342
6.8370
2.4689
1.2221
Haiiiai
Percent
37.5488
39.7218
25.4962
29.3048
15.6248
15.7819
30.1587
4.1113
060
-------
Sonar? Results of Percent of Total Kxpeditores for each Activity
by region
Grantee Activity
I. AHBI8IT BOIITORIIG.
II. STATIOIAil S008CI COBPLIAICl
III. m Src. BK?IEX/PgE8ITTIHG
17. SIP 1 8KGOIAIIOI DE7EIOPHEIT AID Adopt.
7. All TOIICS
71. ADIIIISTiATIOl
711. OTHER STATE/LOCAL ACTI7ITKS
7III. HOI-SECTIOI 105 iCIIYITIES
- SBUIU1-IA —
laiber
Agencies
Besponding
8
8
6
8
5
3
6
I
Hean
Percent
24.3915
36.3754
12.0603
8.2906
6.5216
15.9131
1.3202
2.5436
Standard
Deflation
7.9631
10.8827
10.2503
4.5356
7.8679
6.4173
1.6687
,
Uiniini
Percent
12.3080
18.1559
1.0866
2.9778
0.2947
S.8038
0.1277
2.5436
Haxim
Percent
37.0224
53.7062
25.3406
15.7450
19.8387
29.0012
4.6632
2.5436
-------
Sauarj Results of Percent of Total hpeditnres for eack Activity
bj regioi
BIGIOI=I
Grutee Activity
I. A8BIIIT HOIITOBIK.
II. ST4TIOIABT SOOEC! COHPLIilCI
III. m Src. BITIIU/P1BHITTII6
IT. SIP I 1IGOUTIOI DITiLOPHIR AID Adopt.
r. AIR TOXICS
TI. ADBIIISTIATIOI
TIL OTilE STATI/LOCAL ACTITITIS
Till. HOI-SICTIOI 105 ACTITITIIS*
ftmber
Agencies Bean Standard Biniiui
Eespondini Percent Deviation Percent
20.9278
20.9801
5.1719
8.3549
2.1105
12.3392
0.8784
35.8581
8.0221
10.5168
5.1587
5.8194
1.0377
9.4713
0.9181
26.9087
11.5315
1.2870
0.4290
2.6837
0.7174
5.998S
0.9731
10.1073
Hazinu
Percent
32.7163
30.5572
13.1665
18.2073
3.4032
30.8282
2.1734
76.7757
*These funds are used exclusively to support the vehicle inspection program
for all States and the field burning program in Oregon. These activities are
not a part of the Section 105 grant program in Region X.
C-62
-------
APPENDIX C-5
Frequency Distributions of the Average Cost Per Workyear
-------
-------
Frequency Distribution of Average Cost Per Work Year
Agency Type=LOCAL
Range
Of Cost ($)
Per Workyear
20000-
25000-
30000-
35000-
40000-
45000-
50000-
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
50000
55000
Number
Of
Agencies
2
4
13
. 8
6
5
1
Agency Type=STATE
Range
Of Cost ($)
Per Workyear
15000-
20000-
25000-
30000-
35000-
40000-
45000-
50000-
55000-
•20000
•25000
•30000
35000
•40000
45000
50000
55000
60000
• Number
Of
Agencies
1
2
. 3
10
15
4
2
4
2
C-64
-------
Frequency Distribution of Average Cost Per Work Year
Region=I
Range
Of Cost ($)
Per Workyear
20000-25000
35000-40000
45000-50000
55000-60000
Number
Of
Agencies
1
1
1
1
RegionsII
Range
Of Cost ($)
Per Workyear
20000-25000
30000-35000
40000-45000
50000-55000
Number
Of
Agencies
1
1
1
1
Region=III
Range
Of Cost ($)
Per Workyear
15000-
25000-
30000-
35000-
45000-
•20000
30000
•35000
40000
50000
Number
Of
Agencies
1
1
3
1
1
Region=IV
Range
Of Cost ($)
Per Workyear
20000-
25000-
30000r
35000-
40000-
45000-
55000-
•25000
30000
•35000
•40000
•45000
50000
60000
Number
Of
Agencies
1
4
6
4
3
1
065
-------
Frequency Distribution of Average Coat Per Work Year
Region=V
Range
Of Cost ($)
Per Workyear
30000-35000
35000-40000
40000-45000
Number
Of
Agencies
2
5
3
Region=VI
Range
Of Cost ($)
Per Workyear
25000-30000
30000-35000
35000-40000
40000-45000
Number
Of
Agencies
1
4
2
1
Region=VII
Range
Of Cost ($)
Per Workyear
20000-25000
30000-35000
35000-40000
45000-50000
Number
Of
Agencies
1
3
4
1
Region=VIII
Range
Of Cost ($)
Per Workyear
25000-30000
30000-35000
35000-40000
50000-55000
Number
Of
Agencies
1
2
2
1
-------
Frequency Distribution of Average Cost Per Work Year
Region=IX
Range
Of Cost ($)
Per Workyear
30000-
35000-
40000-
45000-
50000-
35000
40000
45000
50000
55000
Number
Of
Agencies
1
2
2
2
1
Region=X
Range
Of Cost ($)
Per Workyear
30000-35000
35000-40000
45000-50000
50000-55000
Number
Of
Agencies
1
2
1
2
C-67
-------
APPENDIX C-6
Stationary Source Compliance Responsibility Breakdown
. c-68
-------
-------
Percent Of Total Source Inspections And Inspection Expenditures
With No Federal Responsibility
Number
Agencies
Basis Responding
Local
State
Overall
31
17
48
Percent
Of
Inspections
64.9389
44.4779
54.4439
Percent
Of
Inspection
Expenditures
36.7803
18.3246
23.7219
C-6Q
-------
Percent Of Total Enforcement Actions And Enforcement Expeditures
With No Federal' responsibility
Number
Agencies
Basis Responding
Local
State
Overall
23
11
34
Percent
Of
Enforcement
Actions
50.6251
17.9946
27.9393
Percent
Of
Enforcement
Actions
Expend! tufej.
16.4006
5.3382
6.8881
070
-------
Percent Of Total Enforcement Actions And Enforcement Expeditures
In Non-Attainment Areas
Number
Agencies
Basis Responding
Local
State
Overall
25
29
54
Percent
Of
Enforcement
Actions
32.6660
44.3054
40.7581
Percent
Of
Enforcement
Expenditures
73.4692
49.0412
52.4636
-------
Percent Of Total Enforcement Class B Actions
And Enforcement Expeditures
Number
Agencies
Basis Responding
Local
State
Overall
20
27
47
Percent
Of
Enforcement
Actions
15.9717
35.2289
29.3599
Percent
Of
Enforcement
Expenditures
24.3154
22.0259
22.3467
072
------- |