EPA-450/3-79-023
Revised Prioritized List
of Source Categories
for NSPS Promulgation
by
M.R. Monarch
Energy and Environmental Systems Division
Argonne National Laboratory
Argonne, Illinois 60439
Interagency Agreement No. D-7-0 1075
EPA Project Officer: Gary McCutchen
Prepared for
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Air, Noise, and Radiation
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
March 1979
-------
1 BACKGROUND
Section lll(f) of the Clean Air Act1(CAA) requires that EPA publish a
list of major stationary sources of air pollution not already listed under
Section lll(b)(1)(A); that is, for which NSPS had not, as of August 7, 1977, been
proposed or promulgated. The list was to he promulgated by August 7, 1978, after
EPA had provided notice of an opportunity for public hearings and consulted with
Governors and State air pollution control agencies. In developing priorities,
EPA was to consider (1) the quantity of emissions from each source category,
(2) the extent to which each pollutant endangers public health or welfare, and
(3) the mobility and competitive nature of each stationary source category,
e.g., the capability of a new or existing source to locate in areas with less
stringent air pollution control regulations. After the list is promulgated,
Governors may submit applications under Section lll(g) to add major source
categories to the list, add any source category to the list which may endanger
public health or welfare, change the priority ranking, or revise promulgated
NSPS.
Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), under contract with EPA, initiated
development of this list by compiling information on a large number of source
categories from a number of literature resources. This preliminary list was
evaluated using the criteria specified in Section lll(f) of the CAA. A draft
report describing this analysis was reviewed by the National Air Pollution
Control Techniques Advisory Committee on April 6, 1978.
A final report published in April 1978 (see Ref. 2 - Priorities for
NSPS Under the Clean Air Aot Amendments of 1977, EPA-450/3-78-019) describes
the methodology used to apply the criteria and provides the resource material
used in developing the list.
2 NSPS PRIORITIZATION PROGRAM
The source category data were first analyzed to determine those sources
which have the potential to emit 100 tons or more per year of any one pollutant.
These major source categories were then subjected to a priority ranking pro-
cedure using the three criteria specified in the CAA. - The priority ranking
procedure used represents an extension of an earlier Argonne procedure develop-
ed to prioritize NSPS source categories using an extensive industrial data base
developed by TRC, Inc.1* ,~
-------
EPA-450/3-79-023
Revised Prioritized List
of Source Categories
for NSPS Promulgation
by
M.R. Monarch
Energy and Environmental Systems Division
Argonne National Laboratory
Argonne, Illinois 60439
Interagency Agreement No. D-7-0 1075
EPA Project Officer: Gary McCutchen
Prepared for
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Air, Noise, and Radiation
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
March 1979
-------
1 BACKGROUND
Section lll(f) of the Clean Air Act1(CAA) requires that EPA publish a
list of major stationary sources of air pollution not already listed under
Section lll(b)(1)(A); that is, for which NSPS had not, as of August 7, 1977, been
proposed or promulgated. The list was to be promulgated by August 7, 1978, after
EPA had provided notice of an opportunity for public hearings and consulted with
Governors and State air pollution control agencies. In developing priorities,
EPA was to consider (1) the quantity of emissions from each source category,
(2) the extent to which each pollutant endangers public health or welfare, and
(3) the mobility and competitive nature of each stationary source category,
e.g., the capability of a new or existing source to locate in areas with less
stringent air pollution control regulations. After the list is promulgated,
Governors may submit applications under Section lll(g) to add major source
categories to the list, add any source category to the list which may endanger
public health or welfare, change the priority ranking, or revise promulgated
NSPS.
Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), under contract with EPA, initiated
development of this list by compiling information on a large number of source
categories from a number of literature resources. This preliminary list was
evaluated using the criteria specified in Section lll(f) of the CAA. A draft
report describing this analysis was reviewed by the National Air Pollution
Control Techniques Advisory Committee on April 6, 1978..
A final report published in April 1978 (see Ref. 2 - Pm-ovlt-Les for
NSPS Under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, EPA-450/3-78-019) describes
the methodology used to apply the criteria and provides the resource material
used in developing the list.
2 NSPS PRIORITIZATION PROGRAM
The source category data were first analyzed to determine those sources
which have the potential to emit 100 tons or more per year of any one pollutant.
These major source categories were then subjected to a priority ranking pro-
cedure using the three criteria specified in the CAA. ; The priority ranking
procedure1 used represents an extension of an earlier Argonne procedure develop-
ed to prioritize NSPS source categories using an extensive industrial data base
developed by TRC, Inc.** -
-------
In summary, the prioritization procedure first ranks source categories
on a pollutant by pollutant basis. This results in nine lists [one for each
pollutant hydrocarbons (HC), nitrogen oxides (NO ), particulate matter (PM),
X
sulfur dioxide (SCL), carbon monoxide (CO), lead (Pb), fluorides (F), acid
mist (AM), and hydrogen sulfide (H^S)] with each list ranked using the criteria
in the CAA. In this ranking, first priority is given to quantity of emissions,
second priority to potential impact on health and welfare, and third priority
to mobility. Thus, sources with the greatest growth rates and emission reduc-
tion potential are high on each list; sources with limited choice of location,
low growth and small emission potential are low on each list.
The nine lists are combined.into one by selecting pollutant goals a
procedure which, in effect, assigns a relative priority to pollutants based
upon the potential impact of NSPS. After the pollutant goals are selected, the
final priority list is established through the selection of source categories
which will have maximum impact on attaining the selected goals. The effect of
this procedure is to emphasize control of organic (hydrocarbon), particulate
matter, sulfur dioxide, and NO emissions and to give carbon monoxide and
noncriteria pollutants a lower priority.
The ranking of source categories on the list and, in fact, the differ-
entiation between major and minor sources is sensitive to the accuracy of the
data utilized. The ranking is especially sensitive to emission factors, source
sizes, mobility, and source category growth rates. Because the original data
base used to establish,.the priority list was obtained from a number of literature
sources and because time was not available to perform an independent verification
of these data, it was expected that further study will identify certain inaccu-
racies in the original data base.
3 REVISED DATA BASE
EPA published the proposed list of major source categories in the
Federal Register (see 43 FR 38872, August 31, 1978). Copies of the Pviovi-
tlzation Doeumenb"2- were submitted to the Governors of the States and were made
available to the general public.
EPA forwarded to ANL for revaluation comments received on the priori-
tization of major source categories. These comments came from the public
sector and from EPA staff. Due to both EPA and public comments, ANL reexamined
-------
34 major source category data sets out of the 156 source category data sets in
the original prioritized list. ANL also reexamined 11 minor source category
data sets.
3.1 IMPACT OF DATA CHANGES ON MINOR SOURCE CATEGORIES
As a result of both EPA and public comments, 11 minor source categories
were reexamined and data changes were made for nine source categories. In
addition, one source category (i.e., Printing Ink Mfgr.) was reclassified from
a major source to a minor source category. Table 3-1 illustrates the change
in potential emission reduction (i.e., Ts-Tn) as a result of the data changes.
Table 3.1 indicates some significant potential emission reduction .for hydro-
carbon source categories resulting from data set revisions.
3.2 IMPACT OF DATA CHANGES ON MAJOR SOURCE CATEGORIES
As a result of EPA and public sector comments on the original priori-
tized list proposed in the Federal Register, ANL reexamined 34 major source
category data sets. The reexamination resulted in data changes for 22 major
source categories, which included reclassifying one major source category as
a minor source category (i.e., Printing Ink Mfgr.). In addition, seven major
source categories were removed from the prioritized list. Six of these source
category deletions resulted from up-dated data indicating essentially zero new
and replacement source category growth. These source categories are: Varnish/
Oleo-Resin, Steel/Open Hearth, High Explosive Waste Mfgr., Grey Iron Cupola,
Hydrofluoric Acid Mfgr. and High Btu Gasification. ANL was unable to determine
acceptable input data for the Low Explosives Mfgr. Industry, therefore, this
source category was dropped from the list.
3.3 IMPACT OF PROGRAM CORRECTION ON PRIORITIZATION LIST
In addition to source category data set changes, a modification to the
prioritization program caused some changes to the prioritized list. In the
original prioritization program, no provision was made to ignore standard set-
ting for pollutant emissions with a zero Ts-Tn value. For instance, a major
source category may have a high Ts-Tn for hydrocarbons and a zero Ts-Tn for
particulate emissions and the source category'have a high air quality impact
for both pollutants. In the development of the original list, the program was
-------
Table 3-1. Minor Source Category Data Change
Impact on Q?s--Tn)a
Source Category
Pollutant
Wood Furniture
. HC
Metal Furniture
HC
Mica Mining
PM
Mica Drying
PM
Lead Pigment Red
Pb
Lead Pigment White
Pb
Lead Pigment Chr ornate
Pb
Graphic Arts
. Lithography
HC
Polyisoprene
HC
Printing Ink Mfgr.
HC
Old
32,600
31,300
310
610
b
b
b
26,300
100
10*590
(Ts-Tn) ton/yr
New % Change
.«
451,000 1283
172,000 449 ,
520 68
520 -15
b
b
b
44,000 67
310 210
8,200 -23
Ts - Emissions in 1990 under existing (1980) state
emission limits (tons/yr).
Tn - Emissions in 1990 under proposed NSPS level of
emission control where NSPS is in effect in 1980
(tons/yr).
Source categories indicate small potential emission
.reduction or decreasing capacity.
-------
Pollutant List
HC, CO
PM, NO, CO, FL
PM
PM
HC
Pb
Pb
not Instructed to ignore zero Ts-Tn source category/pollutant sets. This
problem was corrected and resulted in some shift in source category priori-
tization irrespective of input source category data set changes.
The elimination of the zero Ts-Tn source category/pollutant sets also
resulted in the elimination of some source categories from the list where
these source categories had no Ts-Tn values greater than .zero. These,source
categories and the pollutant list from which they were removed are:
Source Category
Acetic Acid (Butane)
Fiberglass (Textile Process)
Stone Quarrying
Synthetic Rubber
Textile Mfgr. (Heat Setting/Finishing)
Gasoline Additives (Electrolytic)
Gasoline Additives (Sodium-Lead)
Table 3-2 is the revised prioritized list of source categories for NSPS
promulgation based on source category data changes. A prioritization by (Ts-Tn)
requires that the source categories be divided into three distinct groups of
high, moderate, and low (Ts-Tn). The range of (Ts-Tn) values for the three
groups In the new data set is the same as was used in the original data set.
The distribution of source categories among the three (Ts-Tn) groups is roughly
the same for both the original and new data sets. In the original data set
there were 34 high (Ts-Tn) source categories, 58 moderate and 64 low. In the
revised data set there are 29 high (Ts-Tn) source categories, 55 moderate and
64 low.
Table 3-3 indicates the impact data changes had on the source category
prioritization rank. Since the total list of prioritized major source cate-
gories was reduced from 156 to 148 due to source category deletions, the source
category rank is also presented in normalized format for comparative purposes.
Table 3-3 contains all the major source categories which received either EPA
or public comment except those major source categories deleted from the list.
Examination of Table 3-3 indicates that over 60% of the source categories
receiving comment incurred only minor change in prioritization rank.
Table 3-4 shows the effectiveness of the prioritized standard setting
schedule on emission reduction over a ten year period from 1980 to 1990. The
table is similar to Table 3-14 in the original prioritization report.
The
-------
IS
CD CA CD CD C*
o o o o o ooooooc>cD<7»ooc>'Or>
CTs O CD CD CD C3OCDCDaCDt~JCDC^OCDCt*<".C.'*
O O CD CD CD CD O CD CD CD C3 rr. <~3 r* CD CD O Cn C^
O CD C3 CD LT1 O O L") CD C3 v.-i C-- CO O CJ) CD t. O C.-
K> CD o o sn o v-r v. u~i o N o ; j ro c-: m f j <*>
to
a
tn
o:
re
M
5
o
«
x o
t 1-1
UJ LJJ
-
1-1 <
a z
UJ -
K en
^ u en
^> H UJ
Q
co c; c;
LJ a.
i
-H cr -
s
o en
LJ UJ
M CD
o; 2:
CJ UJ
-
-
_J
CJ
1
CD
£H ^^
i~^ "- "
Z >-i
LJ M
n Z
«l ^
_J
? CJ
LU O
Z UJ
O K-
^" ~
CD tT
LD C
^ C»
cn
LU
P5
LU
O
cn
cn
cv
cC
CJ
CJ
UJ
1-4
_1
LU
r_
t-i
c.
i5
LU
O
1-H
t
tj~opOLJZOLjoooLJLJZOoCLJogoicazpzor; grioozr:
CM
i
to
o
a.
ui
>
«-c\lcslK).d->3-Lnoo« « cMPJt\jioiOsnriinvor~eocoeo<»»o«-
CM CM CM CNJ C\J CM CM CJ CJ (M CM CNJ CM CM C-J OJ CJ
-------
SSSSo ooSiuootJucocacam
CNOOCDCK
ei»o<
C3 CD C3 CD CD O CD
O CD O O CD CD CD
O M <
LJ u (-> a o UJ u,
CD O O CD O IO O
CM CM CM f> rO vJ3 vO
en
en
Ul
PR
§
M
i I
_J LJ
1 I
cc
Ul
u. en
~* z
in
v
M CL. O
z i-1
M Ul I-
= S 2
2 § S
>~ +*
I- z Q: z
Ul t- 0 3
JC Ul < Z
£5
I
LJ
CYCLOHEXA
IO Ul
Z 0
ui .~ U -J I
X a: <> ui ~
o tJ ui cu a
H- 1 1 Q- O Ul
Ul Ul Ul -
ui < >-z z 3:
j j m ui ui H-
.>- >- _J Cl -- 1 1 Ul
n. n: > ui >>->-
THANOL PLA
TS
ARCOA
EXAN
CYC
DE
OX
NE
FROM
a:
UI
a
eo
UI
5£ tn
i z
K. -1 - o a
en u. <
OIL MFG
1- EC
«I LJ
O
u < MO.
E EESSIS
> o o o o o o u o o o s o o E u u
: -r = u z z o
o
T
00
-------
0000000
CD CD O CD O O O
CD O O O
C3 C3 CD O C3 O O
CD O O CD CD O
CD o o O C3 C3 CD
CD O CJ CD O O C3
" »- rj C\J -JD CD UI
ITl » CD « fO t vj-
O O
a;
(-0
LLJ
ixi
o
o
a
o
o;
Q-
i
>
ca
-
-ft i
v.t-
ID uj
o
a:
»
£0
rj
S
UJ
ca
UJ
I
_
a.
to
t
o
a
o
O
3
>
or
2
<[ US
o 2:
(_) IH
>-
UJ <
u o
^ CJ
-> <£
C/) l-l LU
UJ _J CK
_i a. I-H
M C- 3
co < en
o i- to
^rz LU uj uj
o CD T. n:
t- a; ci a.
3 < -c n;
in
M
3C
g
<;
to
IH
§
o ^
UJ
J U.
- CJ
o o o o: en ~~
o u o t^ <
- CO O
UJ UJ UJ 3 CS)
o LJ o Q ii a:
< - O 1
Ul H* UJ _J
UJ
a
Z o
S <
a KJ
to o ;iip
U) UJ UJ 1 LU -ZI UJ
:iD SULFITE)
<
|
CD
y
0.
2
o
1
Ul
, a:
u
(BLAST FURNACE)
CO
§
0.
S
a.
a.
o
-co
CO
i
a.
z
CO
Ul
Z UI
< z
CO Ul
to >-
m i-
.eooo><7.c3r-cvJ
-------
11
ms-fvT*om*cr*o* tnmsovt'sovt'O^'ND'^r ^~ *JD VF in osf*"-^otcfv/i^/5*'~*o CM sj3vt-c\j*~'*'~cM*^~ini^in»rt's'f* tn
zzzzzzzzzzzirzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzjzzszzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
tn*~*~^"CsjeMCMc\jr^-r^r>r^-^*^"y~*~cDCDc3C\JCMCsiCMocDC3T-'<"T-"t^f cpoinin*"'ooooin**c^ocooor^CM
zzzzzzzzzzz
OCDOCDCDCDOOCDOO
O CD CD CD CD C?»
CD CD C3 C3 CD CN
CD CD cp O O CN
o cj o in o o
C3 ro sT) OJ
CDO O OC*>
CD CD O O Cf>
CD O CD CD CP»
CO ID O CD <7»
CO CD *
a> o o
C* CD O
<7< CD O
CT» CD O
-f CD
C7-C5 O
Cf» CD CD
> CD OCDCDCDCDCDCDOCDCDCDeDL
SO CDCDCDCDCDOCD. CDCDOOOCDOOOCDCDCNCD
* CD OCDCDCDCDOrOOO CD CD OCDCDCDCDOCDOCD
CDCDC3OCT-OC3OCDCDO
C3CDCDCDC*CDOCDCDOC*
) r-o CD«
en
<
o
o
eg
to
-
01
o
en
H
O
m
tD
%
tD
to
<
o:
g
eg
a
en o
tD en
i I
eg
UJ
a.
tD
§
en
I
B!
a z
o:
2
to
a:
o
01
UJ
en
UJ
>-
o
a.
en
en
o
o
>-
a:
a
en
-
a:
a
o
tn
M
O
eg
UJ
a.
to
to
3
^ wl"
HI (X) G£ Z
M o m z
H ^^ X ^"*
h- tD < eD
en to eg to
en z
3 eg
i 2
I-*
_J
V) LLt
en 10 o LU
Eg LU H
LU S E I-Z
|_ 3 LU LU LU
en MZZ to i-
Ul Z O I- OM
>-ocgzeg-J
- en
z uj z a
o z eg uj v uj
hH fH O «i ,
in
CO
-------
12
I
7
co
§ i o
T4 O v«
§ S "
o a
I S I
I. § s
1 o I
fi«
O U S
rt O
« f b b
U T<
H e -o
o
b -3 >»
2 "* S
o a co
o »j o
u
a
&
>, o
u u
g, S
£ o
q o
i
I
cl
F
o
u
a o
0 S
O 41
S
Catego
V
4J
03
I
85
§
* -8 S
sl!l
5
- ,3 S 8 &
8 « S « s
-a d *-
8 ^
1
1
i
l
1
0)
s
III
s
«
1
^T
8
01
1
1
U
o
h
-------
13
Table 3-3. Data Change Impact on Prioritized List
of Major Sources
Rank in Prioritized List
Original
Major Source Category
Ammonium Sulfate
Polystyrene Production
Cotton Ginning3
Metal Coil Coating (ISC)
Fabric Coating (ISC)
Auto Surface Coating (ISC)
Large Appliance Coating (ISC)a
Beer Production
Gypsum Mining (AGG)
Fluorspar Industry
Potash
Sand & Gravel
Vegetable Oil
Carbon Black
Polypropylene
Gravure (Graphic Arts)
Letterpress (Graphic Arts)
Flexography (Graphic Arts)
Formaldehyde
By-Product Coke Oven
Alfalfa Dehydrating
Brick & Related Clay Products3
Periodic Kiln (Gas)
Chemical Wood Pulping
Acid Sulfite
Chemical Wood Pulping
NSSC
Total
. Actual
87
116
146
65
12
21
73
37
28
135
81
27
44
4
120
13
75
67
5
14
148
126
36
34
156
Normalized
56
74
94
42
8
14
47
24
18
87
52
17
28
3
77
8
48
43
3
9
95
81
23
22
-100
Revised
Actual
134
107
140
55
16
63
64
79
24
131
74
23
54
12
120
9
66
58
48
57
142
118
100
19
148
Normalized
91
72
95
37
11
43
43
53
' 16
89
'50
16
37
8
81
6
45
39
32
39
96
80
68
13
-100
Source category was revaluated but no data change was deemed warranted,
-------
14
prioritization schedule emission reduction is bounded for comparative purposes
by the worst possible case of no NSPS standards set during the ten year period
and the best possible case of all NSPS standards set in the base year, 1980.
Table 3-4 compares well to Table 3-142 reflecting the original data set.
There are only small differences in the percent change of pollutant emissions
in the case where all NSPS are set in the. base year. This indicates that large
differences in percent changes in the case of no NSPS set (i.e., CO and Pb) are
primarily due to growth factors. Also, source categories characterized by de-
creasing capacity and zero replacement rate such as Grey Iron Cupola were de-
leted from the list. The revised data set indicates a slightly better reduc-
tion in particulate emissions and lead emissions and a slight increase in sul-
fur dioxide emissions and nitrogen oxide emissions. ',
4 EPA LIST
Table 3-5 indicates the EPA prioritized list based on EPA aggregation
of source categories from the ANL list. Table 3-5 compares the proposed EPA
list (43FR38872, August 31, 1978) with the revised list resulting from data
set revaluations and the final list resulting from both data set revaluations
and corrections made to the prioritization program routine (i.e., eliminating
zero Ts-Tn pollutant/source category data sets for standard setting).
-------
15
CO
a
o
H
CO
CO
s
w
fi
0
CO
Cu
H
60
CU
4J
cd
4-1
CO
a
o
H
4-1
Cfl
N
H
4-1
rH
M
O
H
FM
t. .
O
CO
o
Cfl
s
«
rH
cu
CO 4-1
CO PM Cfl
PJ CO -H
CO !S TJ
& a)
1-1 1
!3 < \-t
rH CM
O
CO
rH
1
CN
0
st"
1
0
CO
CM
I
m
o
CM
I
CO
CN
CN
1
f-
co
CN
1
CN
m
CM
CM
CO
rH
rH
CN
|
Cfl
OO
CTi
£
Cfl
a\
?
cu P>-.
tl 60
H (U
rH 4-1
CU cfl
CO S-4
Cfl 4-1
m co
f
CO
60
d
H
4->
S-l
cfl
4-1
CO
13
0
H
J-l
a>
o.
cfl
a)
K^l
a)
a)
$-1
4J
pj
H
4-1
a)
CO
a)
rQ
o
4J
CO ,
13
cfl
13
S
cfl
1 1
CO
J f
rH
cd
CO
a)
M
H
&
a)
^4
K^»
60
eu
4-1
cd
^
4-1
CO
a)
.a
,]
CO
Cfl
CU
4-1
Cfl
5-1
i-H
cd
CU
P*»
CO
CU .
4J O
cd oo
CJ C7i
H rH
T3
CJ.fi
H -H
cd
-------
16
CO
-3 JH co
H O
> rH
cu y cd
« iH iH
4-1 M
0) 4J
43 CO
4J 3 CO
Pi Tj Pi
P"I P! cd
CO MO
'
Vi
tt>
GO ^
|**»
O* iH
^ «
3
4J T-H a
CO CO CU
Hi -U O
CO
% cd
co o
^1
4J
iH fM
VI Pi rH CM
5 pi
M
cu
iH
1 1
oo
p4
-w
Pi
H
CU
P4
CU CO
rH 0)
o y
4*J 3
a) o
CXi CO
a)
H
P
bO
Pn
^
j^i
0)
C*
Jj
a>
p-j
a> ca
rH O
o y
4J 3
ai o
PM CO
»*
CO
00
4-1
cd
o
o
cu
y
cd
(H
3
CO
T-H
Vi
4J
CO
3 CO
as
H 0
CO
00
[ t
cd
o
o
0)
CO
rH
Vl
4-1
CO VI
3 CU
cj n)
M PU
00
4-1
cd
cS
cu
y
cd
§
CO
rH
4-1
CO VI
3 CU
^3 pi
Mf2
ai
*H
4J
!
^B
a)
id
i
rH
43
$-1
0}
3
"T^
c
M
CO pj
4J 0
W *ri ^H
<3 4-i cd
cd iH
y u y
H a> vi
J- pi a)
PU IH a
cd y S
. fi
4J
00 CO
Pi M
Pi >
cd p!
a> o
rH U
u
>% cu
S !§
\o r^
1
2
cu
a
y
H
rH
Vi
<£
.,
CO
ri
CO
CU
Pi
13
p!
cd
CO
a) ca
g ^
p"i iH
rH CO
0 CU
PH PJ
»»
OO
4-1
cd
O
a)
y
cd
3
CO
t-H
Vi
4J y
CO iH
3 ti
'S -2
C Co
H Ixj
OO
^
4J :
CO 00
3 Pj
rQ *H
S [ >
O Cd
CJ 0
rH
cd cu
SCJ
cd
0) «H
S' 1
n cd
Pi CO Vl
o cu 4-1 y
H pi CO T+
4-1 iH 3 M
cd oo t> ,a
r- M r*H
y o
cd o
s &
rH
Pi Cd
*-Q
o
CO 0
Vt 4J
y 13
iH O
f^i p j
cd 1
O PQ
Ol O
t-H
1
cd
H
cu
pi
3
CJ CO
S a)
Cd rH
a) iH
4J 0
co pq
13 rH
cu cd
Vl iH
H Vl
ta 4J
1 CO
II
CO CO
CO VI
0 0
Pi
o
4-1
CO
3
i
0
rH
CU
4-1
Pi
M
^"i
VI
Pi CO
o cu
H Pi
4-1 iH
cd oo
4J rj
CO W
1
rH
cd
ri
Vl
4-1
CO
1
M
Ai
P!
O
ri rH
4-1 Cd
Cd lH
vi y
cu vi
ri a
y e
Pi 0
H 0
t-H
t-H
t-H
cd
ri
y
ri
1
!§
2
43
s
0)
5
o
'
00
4-1
cd
8
a>
y
cd
id.
CO
rH
43
VI
4-1 y
CO «ri
3 J i
13 \
M fe
y
ri
rH
^»
Vl
Ji
CO
S
CO
CU
CX
a
O
cd
CO
VI
cu co
S pj
£>» iH
rH CO
o cu
CM
rH
60
Pi
ri
CO
CO
a)
y
o
Vl
pug
t-H
cd
1
y
ri
t-H
rH
cd
*f
S.
1
VI
a>
Jco
Vi
a)
B rH
cd «ri
cu o
4-1 PQ
CO
t-H
13 cd
CU iH
t | J^
ri 4J
tu CO
3
r-i *&
CU Pi
rH
ri CO
CO VI
CO O
O 4-1
t-H
0
a ,
t-H
cd
VI
cu
CO
rH
.00
Pi
ri
CO
CO
CU
y
o
VI
3 ' .
i
y
ri
t-H
t-H
cd
4-1
£
rH
cd
Vl
4-1
3
cu
S3 ' .
00 :
Pi
ri
rH
3
Pk
13 O
O CO
O CO
t-H
cd cu
y 4-1
ri -ri
g >H
CU r-l
Pi
o
ri
4-1
CO
3
"i
CJ)
t-H
cd
g
a>
C
M
V?
cd
pi co
5 cu
ri pi
4J -ri
cd oo
4-> Pi
co pq
^j-
rH
CO
4-1
a)
CO
cd
4-1
cd
13
^>
O
00
cu
4-1
cd
y
0)
y
VI
3
O
CO
4-1
Pi
cd
4-1
3
rH
rH
O
Pti
rj
1
ca
H
o
Vl
a)
N
oo
pi
ri
4-1
cd
S
ri
pi
rH
a)
CO
4-1
y
cu
t-H
-------
17
Ed
fi
o
H O>
o) r^.
5 "c
C£
v3
1
CU
ft '
ft
CN tJ
CJ
Secondary
o
co
CO
CO
iH
J CO
Non-Metallic Mineral P;
Metallic Mineral Procei
oo
rl
ta
Synthetic !
rH
cd
cu
S
Industrial Surface Coating
Coil
CO
cd
rt\
Crude Oil and Natural (
Production
m
CM
g
ca cu -H
O 60 4J
4J 5-4 O
^* ^ rT^
o
*r p i
60 60
CJ fi 03
H -H cd
cd cd
O O rH
CJ CJ cd
cu w
rl CU CU 3 S
3 0 0 60 +J 3 ,
4J cfl cd p) co 5
cj MH IH -H S 'H
Cd }H rl 4J S
IH 3 3 cd 13 3
3 W CO O CJ rH
Cd rH rH
S 'Cd Cd CU rH >,
H -H CJ 'H rl
*O ' rJ rl (S O Cd
O 4J 4-J Cd T3 '
o co co -H cu a
fe 3 3rH TJ 0
P-> T3 "13 ft 3 CJ
rH C (3 ft rl CU
P4 M M
-------
18
JZ
CO
cd
_< ^*i
5
co r--
CN
PH
T3 '
c3
&
S
00
3
H
0)
4J
a
CO
CO
rl
1-3
>
rH
P"H
Potash
Sintering: Clay and
Printing Ink
Synthetic Fibers
CO co
cu
cj
a
O rH
H ,cy
rH S
0 1
Set]
cu
A !~3
CO CO
S .S
CO CO
0 fS (S
S T3 13
£ g ^
M CO CO
cd SH U
*rj OJ CU
O rH rH
0) 0 0
CO PH PH
Foundries : Steel
Glass
Gypsum
60
rl
4-1
cd
8
n\
Plywood Manufacture
Industrial Surface
Large Appliances
Glass
vo r-» oo
CO CO CO
CO
S
H
CU CO
fl a)
a) Prf
M
>> £3
4-1 ^fl
co cn
H W
O PQ
pn ^
CO CO
a a
H -rl
CO CO
cu a)
PH PH
13 "0
§ § CO
CO
co co ' cd
Cd ^J >-l rH
H O rH CM
CU
d,
CU
rH
ft
O
J-t
>>
rH
O
PH
CO
.s
CO
3
13
9
Polymers
-d
H
a>
Ml
Chemical Wood Pulpin
Sulfite
_j
CO
cd
rt
r^
rM
a
Sintering: Clay a:
CO
CO
4J
3
rH
PH
60
5-
M-r
0
3
HH
3
cd
-a
w
<
1
CU
^
1
Polymers arid Resins:
Ammonium Sulfate
3-
CO
o
-§'
w
Q
M
PU
^*»
cd
r-l
O
13
CU
CU *"
^ &
TJ rH
r* r 1
Bricks ai
Ceramic <
CU
CU
>i
4-1
CO
tH*
0
Melamine
Ammonia
Polymers and Resins :
Gypsum
Sodium Carbonate
in ^o
n
0)
rl
rH
rl
.4-1
}-1
-------
19
to
cu
4J
CO
cu
^>
rH
tO_. 0
pi p I
o
H rj
o
cd
CO
to
a CO
pi
rl
rH CO
O CU
. . PH Pi
4-J
CO
H
1-H1 CO
4J
^ti 0s* £j
PH r~~ cd
PH
TJ p!
CU cd 60
tO <-3 PI
H -in
r* M-(
Q) O
PH O
4-1
rH
cd
*d
to
O
03 -rl
O^ o
rH Pi
CU
CO r-T PL.
.HCO
4-1
p!
o oo td
IH oo
PH co w
Pn cu co
3 01 a
rH CO
O CU
PH pi
£"»
4-J
M Pi 0
H P5
CU
3
4-1
rH
3
CO
fj
H
CO
4J
CJ
3
*rj
O
to
P-f
^^
cd
d
>
d cd
Cd rH
.0
CO
rl 0
CU -rl
g 6
^» cd
o cu
PH 0
1
^»
rH
O
PH
to
CO
3
-a*
CO
to
cd to ,
rH
O
Resins:
T3
P!
cd
CJJ
Polymers
propylen
m
in
to
i-i
cu
1
o
PI ft
5
rl *rl
4J Pi
cd cd
rt
W
H i-l
M CU
O N
3 "H
rH rH
4-t -rl
Q to
CU
cu
OJ to
fir O
rH ^ ^
td
g cd
fl CU
^ £
5H
CU
CO
cu
rH
O
'rj
H M
0 pi
v
CJ
Ceramic
OO
i
i
o
to
cd
4-1
i-l
CU
a
rH
.rH
4J
i-l
CU
PH
CU
4J
tfl
4J
&
Ammonium
o\
i
i
cu
rl
rH
i-l
0)
CO
actorie
<4H
Pi
0)
rH
4-J
CO
O
1 1
1 1
to
co
cu
o
O
n .
rH
g
1,
'H
i-4 rH CO
rH
-------
cd
H CT>
rl
20
cr>
a1
a a
cu to
(J PH
^ * g
cu cu cu
CD cd 05
EH O O
4-1
a\
VD
CM
-------
21
REFERENCES
Clean Air Act Amendments of 197?., pl-95-95 (Aug. 7, 1977).
Monarch, M.R., R.R. Cirillo, B.H. Cho, G.A. Concaildi, A.E.' Smith, E.P.
Levins, and K.L. Brubaker, Priorities for New Source Performance Standards
Under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 19773 EPA-450/3-78-019, -Argonne --,-
National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois (April 1978).
Habegger, L.J., R.R. Cirillo, N.F. Sather, Priorities and Procedures for
Development of Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources of
Atmospheric Emissions3 EPA Report No. EPA-450/3-76-020, Argonne National
Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois (May 1976).
Hopper, T.G., W.A. Marrone, Impact of New Source Performance Standards on
1985 National Emission from Stationary Sources, Report Nos. EPA-450/3-017
and -018a,b,c,d,e,f and -019a,b,c, TRC, Inc., Wethersfield, Connecticut
(May 1976).
-------
-------
APPENDIX
-------
-------
ANL
12/78-1/79
MAJOR SOURCE
CODE
Source
Category
(Code No.) Pollutant3
Polystyrene
(20B05)
Ammonium Sulfate
(30D20)
Metal Coil
(63B02)ISC
Fabric Coating HC
(64B02)ISC
Auto Surface
Coating HC
(62B02)ISC
Beer Production HC
(30D09) HC
Grey-Iron
Cupola
(50-C04)
Gypsum-Mining
(42F02)
Gypsum-Curshing
(42F03)
Gypsum-Drying
(42F04)
Fluorspar Mining
(47F02)
CHANGE
INSTRUCTION SHEET
Change _ ,
Data
Pb
PC
PC
A
Es
A
A
Es
Eu
Es
En
All
A
PC
A
PC
A
PC
K
PC
From
.058(c)
.02(s)
.116(c)
15.56(106)
5.34
34. (106)
; 42.6(106)
5.34
10.9
. 10.9
,109
-
17.14(106)
.031(c)
17.14(106)
.031(c)
17.14(106)
' .031(c)
.80
.044(c)
JXCllicti. 1S.G I O V-* .
To Pollutants
.02(s) HC Symbols for growth
.058(c) rate erroneously
assigned on calc.
sheet
0 PM Updated data
18. 71 (10 6) HC
4.65 HC
70.2(106)
58.1(106) HC
3.60
0 PM, HC Remove
0 HC only
0
0 PM, CO, Pb
0 Remove source
from list
13.94(106) PM
.018(s)
13.94(106) PM
.018(s)
13.94(106) PM
.018(s)
.83 PM
0
Only emission rates are pollutant specific, all other values 'will impact
all source category pollutant emissions.
PM-Particulate Matter, So2-Sulfur Dioxide, HC-Hydrocarbons, CO-Carbon Monoxide,
N0x-Nitrogen Oxides, Pb-Lead, HaS-Hydrogen Sulfide, Fl-Fluorides, A.M.-Sulfuric
Acid Mist
-------
ANL
12/78-1/79
MAJOR SOURCE
CODE CHANGE INSTRUCTION SHEET
Source
Category " ' &'
(Code No.) Pollutant
Fluorspar Dryer
(47F03)
Fluorspar Crush.
& Scrap
(47F04)
Potash
(20-A18)
Sand & Gravel
(40A02)
Vegetable Oil*
(30D11)
Carbon Black
(20C03)
HC
HC
HC
HC
HC
HC
CO
CO
CO
PM
PM
PM
SOa
S02
H2S
H2S
HoS
Change, . n , /Q r
Data
K
PC
K
PC
K
PC
A
PC
A
En
Es
Eu
PC
K
A
A
PC
Eu
Es
En
Eu
Es
En
Eu
Es
En
Eu
Es
Eu
Es
En
From
.80
.044(c)
.80
' .044(c)
.78
.03(c)
6.82(106)
0
1142 (106)
15.2
37.9
38
.027(s)
.92
7.4(106)
2.36(105)
.025(c)
100
100
.1
2800
2800
2.8
200
3.1
1.1
-
60
60
.06
To Pollutants
.83 PM, FL
0
.83 PM
0
.87 NO , PM
.029(s) X
6.58(106)
.01(s) PM ;
1296(106)
16.7 PM, HC Growth
25.6 for these.
86.4 Emission
.013(s) change for
.80 HC only.
5.55(106) ton/yr vege-
table oil
2.08(106)
,025(s)
56
56
.8
2048
2048
9.8
41
41
2
104 Add E Valu
104 for SOa
56
56
.6
aOnly emission rates are pollutant specific, all other values will impact
all source category pollutant emissions.
PM-Particulate Matter, So2-Sulfur Dioxide, HC-Hydrocarbons, CO-Carbon Monoxide,
N0x-Nitrogen Oxides, Pb-Lead, H2S-Hydrogen Sulfide, Fl-Fluorides, A.M.-Sulfuric
Acid Mist
-------
*
3
ANL
12/78-1/79
MAJOR SOURCE
Source
Category
(Code No.)
Carbon Black ,
(20C03)
Graphic Arts
Gravure
(60B04)
Graphic Arts
Flexography
(60B05)
Graphic Arts
Letter Press
(60B07)
Polypropylene
(20B07)
Formaldehyde
(20C08)
By-Product
Coke Oven
(50A10)
Steel Open
Hearth
(50D02)
Varnish
(20C15)
Printing Ink,
(20C19)
CODE
Pollutant3
. . SQ£
PM
S02
NO
HCX
CO
All
All
All
All
All
HC
HC
HC
CHANGE
Data
En
PC
A
PC
A
PC
A
K
PC
A
PC
Es -
Es
Es
Es
Es
'PC
Pb
All
PC
Pb
Eu
En
Es
z
All
INSTRUCTION SHEET
Change
From
- 104
-050(c)
.16(106)
.050(c)
.07(106)
-050(c)
' .15(106)
.78
.12 (c)
8.55C106), 3
.094(c)
5 2
5.75 2
.057
5.98 2
2.67 1
,028(s)
.073(s)
.067(s)
.0263(c)
To
.091(s)
.182 (10 6
.037(s)
.055(106
.019(s)
.10(106)
.89
-13(c)
.67(106)
05(c)
.50
.88
.029
.99
.34
0
0
0.
0
120 35.10
4.8 1.40
48 35.10
2. 945(10 3) 362
MAJ MIN
Remarks /S.C.
Pollutants
Add value
HC :
) , i
HC
)
HC,PM
HC,CO
PM,S02,NO ,HC &
CO - Change
for all pollu-
tants
PM^Ox Remove
source cate-
gory from list
HC Remove source
from list
All E's Ib/ton .
ink-Note, reclassify
source as Minor
Only emission rates are pollutant specific, all other values will impact
all source category pollutant emissions.
PM-Particulate Matter, So2-Sulfur Dioxide, HC-Hydrocarbons, CO-Carbon Monoxide,
N0x-Nitrogen Oxides, Pb-Lead, HaS-Hydrogen Sulfide, Fl-Fluorides, A.M.-Sulfuric
Acid Mist
-------
ANL
12/78-1/79
MAJOR SOURCE
CODE CHANGE INSTRUCTION SHEET
Source
Category
(Code No.)
Pollutant'
Data
Change
From
To
Remarks/S.C,
Pollutants
Alfalfa Dehy-
drating
(30D01)
High Btu
Gasification
(21C20)
Chemical Wood
Pulp Acid
Sulfide
(80A04)
.0624(106) .0204(106) PM
Chemical Wood
Pulp NSSC
(80A03)
Hydrofluoric
Acid Plants
(20A08)
S02
S02
S02
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
PM
S02
S02
S02
All
Es
En
Eu
PC
A
Es
En
Eu
K
A
PC
Eu
En
Es
Eu
En
Es
K
All
61
3.1
61
0
3.78(106)
3.00
2.00
24.00
.66
39.4
11.9
81.72
- .014(c)
3.01(106)
3.58
2.44
3.60
.91
5.86(106)
.048(s)
61
3.1
61
.94
3.91(10b)
.0197(s)
158(lb/ton)
3.4 "
158(lb/ton)
1.54
.046
1.54
.85
HC,S02 Remove
source category
from list
S02,PM
Add value
Fl Remove source
category from
list
High Explo- All NO,PM,S02,AM
sives Remove source
(20-C19) category from list
Only emission rates are pollutant specific, all other values will impact
all source category pollutant emissions.
PM-Particulate Matter, So2-Sulfur Dioxide, HC-Hydrocarbons, CO-Carbon Monoxide,
N0x-Nitrogen Oxides, Pb-Lead, H2S-Hydrogen Sulfide, Fl-Fluorides, A.M.-Sulfuric
Acid Mist
-------
MAJOR SOURCE
CODE CHANGE INSTRUCTION SHEET
ANL
12/78-1/79
Source
Category
(Code No.)
Change
Pollutant'
Data
From
To
Remarks/S.C.
Pollutants
Low Explosive All
Remove source
category from
list
Only emission rates are pollutant specific, all other values will impact
all source category pollutant emissions.
PM-Particulate Matter, So2-Sulfur Dioxide, HC-Hydrocarbons, CO-Carbon Monoxide,
NO^-Nitrogen Oxides, Pb-Lead, HaS-Hydrogen Sulfide, Fl-Fluorides, A.M.-Sulfuric
Acid Mist
-------
ANL
12/78-1/79
MINOR SOURCE
CODE CHANGE INSTRUCTION SHEET
Source
Category
(Code No.) Pollutant
Wood Furni- HC
(65-B02)
Metal Furni-
ture
(64-B03)
Mica Mining
(46-F02)
Mica Drying
(46-F03)
Lead Pigment Red
(21A21)
Lead Pigment
White
(22A21)
Lead Pigment
Chrome
(23A21)
Graphic Arts
Lithography
(60B06)
Polyisoprene
(20D05)
Printing Ink
Mfgr
(20C19)
Data
Es
A
A
K
PC
A
K
PC
A
PC
A
PC
A
PC
A
PC
A
PC
A
All
Change
From To S . C
5.34 4.65
10.3(106) 165(106)
9.39(106) 51.8(106)
.80 .87
.017(c) .044(s)
.18(106) .212(106)
.80 .87
.017(c) .044(s)
.18(106) .212(106)
.026(c) .014(s)
.0266(106) .0384(106)
.026(c) .014(s)
.00467(106) .0067(106)
.026(c) .014(s)
.0685(106) .0990(106)
.050(c) .lOl(s)
.08(106) .103(106)
,030(c) -07(c)
.085(106) .134(106)
MAJ MIN
Remarks / 1
J. Pollutants 1
HC 1
HC 1
PM 1
PM . 1
pb
"
^
HC
HC
Source reclassi-
fication - Note
Major Source change
Sheet j
aOnly emission rates are pollutant specific, all other values will impact
all source category pollutant emissions.
PM-Particulate Matter, So2-Sulfur Dioxide, HC-Hydrocarbons, CO-Carbon Monoxide,
N0x-Nitrogen Oxides, Pb-Lead, H2S-Hydrogen Sulfide, Fl-Fluorides, A.M.-Sulfuric
Acid Mist
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
EPA-450/3-79-Q23
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Revised Prioritized List of Source Categories
for NSPS Promulgation
5. REPORT DATE
.March, 19.Z9-
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
M. R. Monarch
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Energy and Environmental Systems Division
Argonne National Laboratory
Argonne, Illinois 60439
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
IA6-D7-0 1075
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
Emission Standards and Engineering Division
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Final
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 require that the USEPA consider
specific criteria in determing priorities for setting NSPS for major source
categories: quantity of air pollutant emissions, extent to which air pollutant
emissions endanger public health and welfare and the mobility and competitive
nature of each source category. A previous report (EPA-450/3-78-019) describes
a methodology that has been developed for prioritizing source categories using
the Clean Air Act criteria. The methodology, which employs three distinct
computer programs, was applied to a data set of over 150 major source categories
for nine different air pollutant emissions (particulate matter, sulfur dioxide,
nitrogen oxides, hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide lead, sulfuric acid mist, hydrogen
sulfide, and fluorides). The program output is a prioritized list of source
categories for NSPS promulgation over a ten year period based on a multipollutant
source category emission analysis, and was used to propose standard-setting
priorities. This report incorporates input data revisions resulting from comments
on the proposed list and is used to determine a revised NSPS priority list.
17.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
c. COSATI Field/Group
Air Pollution
Stationary Sources
New Source Performance Standards
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Release Unlimited
19. SECURITY CLASS (ThisReport)
Unclassified
21. NO. OF PAGES
20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)
Unclassified
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (Rev. 4-77) PREVIOUS EDITION is OBSOLETE
-------
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
EPA-450/3-79-023
2.
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Revised Prioritized List of Source Categories
for NSPS Promulgation
5. REPORT DATE
Marrh, 1Q7Q
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
M. R. Monarch
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Energy and Environmental Systems Division
Argonne National Laboratory
Argonne, Illinois 60439
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
IAG-D7-0 1075
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
Emission Standards and Engineering Division
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
U..S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Final
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 require that the USEPA consider
specific criteria in determing priorities for setting NSPS for major source
categories: quantity of air pollutant emissions, extent to which air pollutant
emissions endanger public health and welfare and the mobility and competitive
nature of each source category. A previous report (EPA-450/3-78-019) describes
a methodology that has been developed for prioritizing source categories using
the Clean Air Act criteria. The methodology, which employs three distinct
computer programs, was applied to a data set of over 150 major source categories
for nine different air pollutant emissions (particulate matter, sulfur dioxide,
nitrogen oxides, hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide lead, sulfuric acid mist, hydrogen
sulfide, and fluorides). The program output is a prioritized list of source
categories for NSPS promulgation over a ten year period based .on a multipollutant
source category emission analysis, and was used to propose standard-setting
priorities. This report incorporates input data revisions resulting from comments
on the proposed list and is used to determine a revised NSPS priority list.
17.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS C. COSATI Field/Group
Air Pollution
Stationary Sources
New Source Performance Standards
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Release Unlimited
19. SECURITY CLASS (ThisReport)
Unclassified
21. NO. OF PAGES
2O. SECURITY CLASS (This page)
Unclassified
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (Rev. 4-77) PREVIOUS EDITION is OBSOLETE
-------
------- |