National Dioxin Study Tier 4 Combustion Sources, Final Test Report, Site 3, Final Literature Review


                              EPA-450/4-84-014J
National Dioxin Study Tier 4
       Combustion Sources

      Final Literature  Review
                    By
               Radian Corporation
           Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
              Contract No. 68-02-3889
        U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
             Office Of Air And Radiation
        Office Of Air Quality Planning And Standards
           Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

                  June 1986

-------

-------
This report has been reviewed by the Office Of Air Quality Planning And Standards, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, and approved for Publication as received from the contractor. Approval does not signify
that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Agency, neither does mention of trade
names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
                                     EPA-450/4-84-014!

-------

-------
                               TABLE OF CONTENTS

Chapter                              Title

  1.0   EXECUTIVE SUMMARY	!_!

  2.0   BACKGROUND	2-1
        2.1  Background Information on Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxins*
             and Chlorinated Dibenzofurans	2-2
             2.1.1  Structure	 .  . .  . 2-2
             2.1.2  Nomenclature Used in This Report	 2-4

  3.0   LITERATURE REVIEW	; 3_j
        3.1  Overview of the Literature Data Base	 ...... 3-1
             3.1.1  Summary of Stack PCDD and PCDF Emissions. ...... 3-2
             3.1.2  Summary of Ash PCDD and PCDF Emissions. . .  . .  . .  .3-8
        3.2  Emissions Data for Individual Source Categories. ...... 3-15
             3.2.1  Municipal Solid Waste Incinerators.	. .  . 3-15
                    3.2.1.1  United States and Canada	  .     3-17
                    3.2.1.2  Europe ..... 	 3-17
                    3.2.1.3  Japan	'.'.'. 3-17
             3.2.2  Sewage Sludge Incinerators.  .	  . .  . 3-17
             3.2.3  Fossil Fuel  Combustion	.'...'! 3-19
                    3.2.3.1  Coal Combustion. .............. 3-19
                    3.2.3.2  Oil and Coal Combustion	    3-21
                    3.2.3.3  Oil Combustion .	3-21
                    3.2.3.4  Natural Gas Combustion	  . .  . 3-22
                    3.2.3.5  Coal and Refuse-Derived Fuel  Combustion. .  . 3-22
             3.2.4  Wood Combustion	3.22
                    3.2.4.1  Residential Wood Combustion.  ........ 3-22
                    3.2.4.2  Treated Wood Combustion	3-24
             3.2.5  Boilers Co-firing Wastes. .	3-26
             3.2.6  Hazardous Waste Incinerators	 .  . 3-29
                    3.2.6.1  Land-Based Incinerators	'.'.'. 3-29
                    3.2.6.2  Incinerator Ships.  .'	  [ 3.34
             3.2.7  Lime/Cement  Kilns	[  \ 3.35
             3.2.8  Hospital Incinerators	 .  . .  . 3-37
             3.2.9  Wire Reclamation Incinerators .  ......            3.39
             3.2.10 PCB Fires	[ 3.39
             3.2.11 Automobile Emissions. .  . .	  .  .  . 3-43
             3.2.12 Activated Carbon Regeneration Furnaces	! 3-45
             3.2.13 Experimental Studies	"..... 3-47

-------

-------
                               TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter
                       ,2.
                       ,2,
                                   Title                                 Page

      3.3  PCDD Formation Hypotheses  and Factors Affecting
             Emissions  for Combustion Sources	    3.49
           3.3.1  A Summary of  Formation Hypotheses for  PCDD
                  from  Combustion  	  .....      3-49
           3.3.2  Factors Affecting PCDD Emissions from  Combustion*
                  Sources	3.50
                  	•  PCDD in Feed	3.50
                           Precursors in Feed	3-52
                           Chlorine in Feed	[  3.53
                           Combustion Conditions	3.54
                  3.3.2.5  Combustion Temperature 	  ]  3.54
                  3.3.2.6  Residence Time	]  [  3.55
                  3.3.2.7  Oxygen Availability	!  !  !  !  !  3-55
                  3.3.2.8  Feed Processing	3-55
                  3.3.2.9  Supplemental Fuel.	'  .  *  '  3-56

APPENDIX A:  References

APPENDIX B:  Literature Data Base

APPENDIX C:  Data Base Reference Tables
3.3.
3.3.
3.3.2.3
3.3.2.4
  3.2.
  3.2.
                                    iii

-------

-------
                                LIST OF TABLES
Number

 1-1
 2-1

 2-2
 3-1
 3-2

 3-3
 3-4
 3-5
 3-6
 3-7
 3-8
 3-9
 3-10
 3-11
 3-12
 3-13
 3-14
 3-15
 3-16
                              Title                                Page

Summary of PCDD/PCDF Stack Emissions by Source Category            1-2
Nomenclature and Schedule of Theoretical Chlorinated
  Dioxin Isomers	-                2-5
Nomenclature and Schedule of Theoretical* Chiorinated
  Furan Isomers	2-6

Summary of PCDD/PCDF Stack Emissions Data from the Literature.     3-3
Summary of Literature Data on PCDD and PCDF Contents of
  Combustion Ash	       3.9
Source Category: Municipal Solid Waste Incinerators! .  .  .          3-16
Source Category: Sewage Sludge Incinerators	        ' 3-13
Source Category: Fossil Fuel  Combustion	'.'.'. 3-20
                 Wood Combustion	.*!!.' 3-23
                 Boilers Cofiring Wastes	  . . .  . 3-27
                 Hazardous Waste Incinerators	. . .    3-30
                 Lime/Cement  Kilns	  ] 3.35
                 Hospital Incinerators 	  ...... 3-38
                 Wire Reclamation Incinerators 	      '    3.40
                 PCB Fires	j 3_41
                 Automobile Emissions. . .'	]  [ 3.44
           _  _   Activated Carbon Regeneration ......          3.45
Source Category: Experimental	                   ' 3.43
Summary of PCDD/PCDF Formation Hypotheses	   	3-51
Source Category:
Source Category
Source Category
Source Category
Source Category
Source Category
Source Category
Source Category
Source Category
                                     IV

-------

-------
                                LIST OF FIGURES
Number                           .    Title
 2-1   Structural Formulae of Dioxin and Furan Nuclei
Page
2-3

-------

-------
                                   CHAPTER 1
                               EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

     The Air Management Technology Branch of EPA's Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards (OAQPS) was responsible for implementing Tier 4 of the
National Dioxin Study.  Radian Corporation, under task order contract,
provided technical support for this program.  The technical support included
developing literature surveys, preparing sampling protocols, conducting stack
tests, coordinating ash sampling efforts and preparing this and other reports.
     The National Dioxin Study was focused on the study of chlorinated
dibenzo-p-dioxins (CDD's), and in particular on polychlorinated
dibenzo-p-dioxins containing four or more chlorine atoms (PCDD's).  The
acronyms CDD and PCDD will be used in this report to denote these species.
Chapter 2 contains a complete explanation of the nomenclature used in this
report.
     The Tier 4 study began in November 1983 with an extensive literature
survey.  The purpose of the literature survey was to 1) summarize previous
research done on emissions of CDD's and chlorinated dibenzofurans (CDF's) from
combustion processes, and 2) summarize available CDD and CDF emissions data
from combustion processes.  This report is a final update of the initial
literature review and includes CDD/CDF emissions information available in the
literature through July of 1985.
     The literature survey identified 13 broadly defined source categories for
which some PCDD and polychlorinated dibenzofuran (PCDF) emissions data was
available. These are shown in Table 1-1.  The literature survey indicated that
municipal solid waste incinerators were the most frequently tested source
category and had the highest levels of PCDD's and PCDF's in stack gas
emissions.  Commercial boilers co-firing spiked waste oil had the next highest
PCDD concentrations in stack gas emissions, followed by emissions from one
tested unit combusting pentachlorophenol-treated wood.
     PCDD's and PCDF's were not found in stack emissions from all combustion
sources for which data were reported in the literature.  Two utility boilers
                                      1-1

-------














^.
g
UJ
0
1
CO


s
§




UJ

r™

5
ce
u.
i
V)

i— i
5

g
t-
to

M-.

CL
"•s.
D.

fc
|
*
OT


*
rH
1
*-4
UJ
1

1

OJ V)
E 3
ll
O w


O C3O -O
1-1 I— m m o
r^- ot ^f • ....
co 10 I-H r- o o —i ,-H m
m"«rLn m« v vvvv
i~- •-< i m o o i
I m • • it i i i i
» 1 CM 0011
.OrH . i-HOr-r-fT)
r* m •—! o ro p^\ovo»
»— 1 CM *-H i-H • ...O
v v o o o o v
V V V V






OJ

o o »-H rso "o o
cs vo m • • . ot at •
^ \o co .vv vr*-r^-v
i-H CN CO CO i-H V V
>-H i i FH m ll i i
1 CO • • 1 ||
in r- OI-H ^ i— i o ot
p^ r^ *-H*o ...Q

v v o v v v >
v o
v








CM CM ^* CM >-H t— 1 (r) r*H I— 1 ^ «-H t— 1 r*H













OJ
in +->
i- oj tn
tn o u a
o a c
4-> t- t- 0)
a oj 3 c c
L- in _c "- m H °
coTj cc i-!p4j'>>
T3 -^ +-> C Ot-l- M- Ul ^ 4J
OUtOl-H -T-30J O 3 i— r— t-
0 C L. 4->J3C U^t-IOi- 0.
O C4J C.OJ3 t-O^O-Mj:
t--oojT-,
c
(O

t-
o

C/7

^Ij

0
c
^
4->
u

c
^*» OJ
ffl ri
E 0.
• 3 E
U) i— ro
•p o in
1 i °
C "" *3
O J3 ^
i- Q. O)
•P CL C
o
5 <*• t-
•P O O
•o in in
+J OJ OJ
fl +J +J
• o
•o •-- c c

•P c

O ^" OJ OJ
(0 V £. E.
i- s o o
-p >,§"§"
c
•o in in
in i. *~ '"
C CL C C
,

"c
o

TCDD/2378 TCDF scan
"i E 4-> -p r-
I 3 oj oj m
i z a a CM
C IO A (J *O




























*
in
>*

"io
c

J_
1-
£
£
o
•p
c

T3
0)
+J
o
OJ
C
1

O)
c
o
i
3)
•p

c


•J3
0)
t
o
O.
in
c
o
+j
0)
a
1-2

-------
firing PCB-spiked waste oil, a lime kiln, a coal-fired utility boiler and the
incinerator ship M/T Vulcanus were all tested and had less than detectable
PCDD emissions.  In general, the literature survey showed that where
combustion sources did emit PCDD's or PCDF's, these emissions appear to be
dependent on the types of fuel or waste being fired and whether or not the
combustion units were designed and operated specifically to,achieve the
destruction of compounds such as PCDD's and PCDF's.
     Emissions from combustion devices burning clean fuel such as natural gas
and distillate oil have not been adequately characterized.  However, these
sources are unlikely to emit high levels of PCDD/PCDF's because of the low
levels of precursors, specifically chlorine, present in the fuel.  Some high
temperature (above 2,500°F firebox temperature) combustion sources such as
utility boilers and cement kilns were also found to emit less than detectable
amounts of PCDD/PCDF under the test conditions.
     Based on the literature review,  several factors are believed to affect
CDD/CDF emissions.  These factors include the PCDD content of the feed,
precursor content of the feed,  chlorine content of the feed, combustion device
temperature,  combustion device residence time,  combustion device oxygen
availability,  feed processing and supplemental  fuel.
                                      1-3

-------

-------
                                 CHAPTER 2
                                 BACKGROUND
     A literature review for sources of PCDD and PCDF air emissions was made
in 1983 by the Pollutant Assessment Branch (OAQPS/PAB) of the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).a  This review was used as a starting
point for a more focused literature search concerning PCDD emissions from
combustion sources in early 1984.  The 1984 literature review identified -
sources of PCDD and PCDF air emissions and provided the data base on which
the Tier 4 testing program was developed.b  At the conclusion of the source
testing efforts, a final update of this review was conducted to include
CDD/CDF emissions information available through July of 1985.
     This chapter summarizes the final literature review.  Industrial,
commercial, and residential combustion sources that have been tested for
CDD/CDF emissions are identified.  Quantitative data are presented on
emissions of 2378-TCDD, PCDD's, and PCDF's.  Qualitative information on the
source characteristics, feed composition,  and sampling and analytical
methodologies are also presented.
       Brooks, 6. W.  Summary of a Literature Search to Develop Information on
 Sources of  Chlorinated Dioxin  and  Furan Air  Emissions.  Final  Report
 Contract No.  68-02-3513.   U.  S. Environmental  Protection  Agency, October
 1983.

       (Radian Corporation)  National  Dioxin  Study—Tier 4 Combustion  Sources
 Initial Literature Review and Testing Options.   EPA-450/4-84-014B.   October
 1984.
                                       2-1

-------
2.1  BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON CHLORINATED DIBENZO-p-DIOXINS AND  CHLORINATED
DIBENZOFURANS
2.1.1  Structure
     Compounds which  are  generally labeled by the  public  as  "dioxins" are
members  of  a  family  of  organic  compounds  known  chemically   as
dibenzo-p-dioxins.  The common  aspect  of all  dibenzo-p-dioxin compounds  is
that they  have a  three  ring  nucleus  consisting  of two  benzene rings
interconnected by  a  pair  of oxygen  atoms.  The  structural formula of  the
dioxin nucleus and the convention used in numbering its substituent positions
are shown in Figure 2-la.   In general,  the term "dioxins" is used to mean the
chlorinated isomers of dibenzo-p-dioxin.  Theoretically, one to eight chlorine
atoms can occur  at dioxin substituent  positions~~such that 75 chlorinated
dioxin isomers are possible.  Each  isomer  has its  own physical  and chemical
properties and differs from others in the number and relative position of its
chlorine atoms.   The potential  chlorinated dioxin isomers are listed in
Table 2-1.
     One of the 22 isomers with four chlorine atoms is 2,3,7,8-tetrachloro-
dibenzo-p-dioxin (2378-TCDD).  This  isomer is the  principal  focus of  the
Tier 4 study for three reasons:
     1.  2378-TCDD is believed to be the most toxic of the chlorinated
         dioxins,
     2.  2378-TCDD is the  isomer most often associated with exposure and
         potential health  risks to humans,  and
     3.  sufficient associated health and exposure information is
         available on 2378-TCDD to allow a targeted study to be developed.
     The compounds generally referred to as "furans" are members  of a  family
of organic compounds known chemically as dibenzofurans.  They have a  similar
structure to the diben^o-p-dioxins except  that the two benzene  rings  in the
nucleus are interconnected with a five member ring containing only one oxygen
atom.  The structural formula of the furan nucleus and the convention used in
numbering its substituent  positions are shown in Figure 2-lb.   Theoretically,
the chlorinated  furan group can  contain up  to  135 different structural
                                      2-2

-------
   Dibenzo - p - Dioxin Configuration
           9                 1
•Figure 2-la.  Structural Formula of the Dioxin Nucleus
      Dibenzofuran Configuration
          9                  1
Figure 2-lb.  Structural Formula of the Furan Nucleus
                    2-3

-------
isomers, each with varying physical  and  chemical  properties.   The potential
chlorinated furan isomers are listed in Table 2-2.
2.1.2  Nomenclature Used in This Report
     Throughout  this  document the  terms CDD  and CDF will  be used  to
generically indicate chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin or dibenzofuran compounds as
distinguished from specific chlorinated CDD or CDF isomers.  The abbreviations
PCDD and PCDF are used  to  indicate  polychlorinated  dibenzo-p-dioxins  (PCDD)
and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDF) with four or more chlorine atoms.   In
the discussion of emissions data the terms total PCDD and total PCDF represent
the sum of  the  emissions of the tetra  through octa homologues.  The term
"other TCDD's" represents the sum of all CDD isomers containing four chlorine
atoms except  the 2378-TCDD isomer for which  available  emissions data  are
described separately.  The term "chlorinated CDD/CDF homologue" will be used
to,indicate the  family  of  CDD/CDF isomers with a fixed  number of chlorine
atoms.  For example, the tetra chlorinated CDD  homologue consists of all CDD
isomers containing  four  chlorine  atoms.   The  abbreviations   used  for
chlorinated CDD/CDF homologues are included in Tables 2-1 and 2-2.
                                      2-4

-------
        Table  2-1.   Nomenclature  and  Schedule  of Theoretical
                   -  Chlorinated Dioxin  Isomers
Chlorinated Dioxin Compound  (abbreviation)
No. of Isomers
Monochlorodibenzo-p-dioxin  (Mono-CDD)
Dichlorodibenzo-p-dioxin  (Di-CDD)
Trichlorodi benzo-p-dioxin (Tri-CDD)
Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD)
Pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (Penta-CDD)
Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin  (Hexa-CDD)
Heptachlorodi benzo-p-di oxi n (Hepta-CDD)
Octachlorodi benzo-p-di oxi n  (Octa-CDD)
                    TOTAL ISOMERS
      2
     10
     14
     22
     14
     10
      2
     75
                                 2-5

-------
        Table 2-2.  Nomenclature  and Schedule of Theoretical
                    Chlorinated Furan  Isomers
Chlorinated Furan Compound  (abbreviation)
No. of Isomers
Monochlorodi benzofuran  (Mono-CDF)
Dichlorodibenzofuran  (Di-CDF)
Trichlorodibenzofuran (Tri-CDF)
Tetrachlorodibenzofuran  (TCDF)
Pentachlorodibenzofuran  (Penta-CDF)
Hexachlorodi benzofuran  (Hexa-CDF)
Heptachlorodi benzofuran  (Hepta-CDF)
Octachlorodi benzofuran  (Octa-CDF)
                    TOTAL ISOMERS
      4
     16
     28
     38
     28
     16
      4
      1
    135
                                2-6

-------
                                  CHAPTER 3
                              LITERATURE REVIEW
     This  chapter summarizes  the  final  literature  review.   Industrial,
commercial, and  residential  combustion sources that  have been tested  for
CDD/CDF  emissions are  identified.   Quantitative  data  are  presented  on
emissions of 2378-TCDD, PCDD's,  and  PCDF's.   Qualitative  information on the
source  characteristics,  feed  composition,  and  sampling   and  analytical
methodologies are also presented.
     Sections 3.1 and 3.2  present  a  summary of the literature  review.
Emissions data  are presented  for  2378-TCDD,  PCDD, and  PCDF,  along with
qualitative  information  on  source  characteristics.   CDD/CDF  formation
hypotheses are summarized in Section 3.3.  Section 3.4 presents a discussion
of factors affecting COD emissions.  Complete listings of  CDD emissions  data
available from the literature are provided in Appendix B.

3.1  OVERVIEW OF THE LITERATURE DATA BASE
     A review of  the  literature  identified  thirteen broadly defined source
categories for which some PCDD and PCDF emissions data have been collected:
     o    municipal solid waste incinerators,
          sewage sludge incinerators,
          fossil fuel  combustion,
          wood combustion,
          boilers co-firing wastes,
          hazardous waste incinerators,
          hospital incinerators,
          lime/cement  kilns,
          wire reclamation  incinerators,
          PCB fires,
          automobile emissions,
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
                                     3-1

-------
     o    activated carbon regeneration furnaces, and
     o    experimental studies.
     The PCDD and PCDF emissions data  for  each  source  category are  presented
in the following  sections.   The primary purpose of this presentation  is  to
identify combustion sources  that emit  PCDD's  and PCDF's  and,  as a result of
comparisons of  emissions  and source characteristics,  to  identify combustion
sources that are  unlikely to emit  PCDD's  and  PCDF's.   A  positive finding in
the literature  (i.e., detectable  CDD  emissions) may  suggest the  tested
combustion source emits CDD, but  this  conclusion can only be  reached  after
consideration of the  quality of the reported  data or research.  Likewise, a
negative finding in the literature  (i.e.,  less than detectable CDD emissions)
may be misleading if high detection limits or  inappropriate  sampling  and
analysis methods  were used.   Direct comparison of data  reported in  the
literature by different  researchers is difficult  and  should  be done  with
caution for several reasons.  The data are often  reported on  different  bases
which cannot easily be interconverted because of  the lack of  source-specific
information.  Different sampling and analytical  procedures were often used,
and detection limits  are frequently not  specified.   Facility design and
operation may  vary considerably  and this type  of information  is  often
incompletely reported.  Also,  some data are available from draft reports,
emission tests,  and other unpublished documents which have not been subjected
to peer or editorial  review.   For  this  reason,  analysis  or full explanation
of the literature data is not possible.  However, for the purpose of the Tier
4 Study, broad  generalizations can be  drawn.   In the following  sections,
emission test results are presented separately  for each  study along  with
appropriate tables.   If available,  information is provided in  the text  about
the combustion  unit,  analysis of  feed samples,  or  identification  of
precursors present in the feed materials.  When  available, detection limits
are specified.   If analytical  methods  other  than gas chromatography-mass
spectrometry (GC-MS) were used, that information is noted in  the text.
3.1.1  Summary of Stack PCDD and PCDF Emissions
     Table 3-1  presents  a summary  of  stack  PCDD and  PCDF emissions data
available from  the  literature for  combustion sources.  The  data for  each
                                     3-2

-------
%











u
a
^j
I
S
UJ


-J
UJ
t—




u.
<
^
a

tn



tn

5
g
2
t/3

Q


5
Q


tfe

g


Z>
.

m

UJ
h-




















u
•J
|
C
1
II
L.
I

5

C
O
•*• (/
•p +
ms -P -5
•x 0) _
c a
c
*-
u.
C "O
u fl) G
Ou -PC



M
o

c
o
•^ 01
-P 4-i


m .p •*-
E 0) _
*s. a
c
c
Q
§"m si
•P C

+J 0
a
o


c
o

E O •»
C -p •?
e o u
*- o

a
0) ffl
CQ -PC
r** o c
rr 5 "
CN +-» cr
1 3
a. c







r™
£•1
O -H
O) t/1
0) 0
•p 1-

i*

o t-
cn >—


~*
00

^4
.,
i-4
O
- s
O\ * CM
O (M
^ ;-s
00 T

o-i CM no
^ m >-»


i i





^4 0
s *-* » xx
• CO CM O\
o* •— • csj — •
1 1
p^ in
m co





i i




p- o
O> CO
» -*. « «
CO CO i-H O
1 1 —
s ^

tn




i i




ur>

1 AS.

o
o o
u. u.
L.
O
+J 1— (
* 0
U i-H
d i_«
c
U "O
C fl
co a
«-o
I/I C -Q
IQ fO c
X a> «
a
•- o •
«) L. C/)
_fl 3
j UJ 3
CO O
1 ;_
t i— ,— t. O O
>*- w c — .a a> o v»
^- i— •*» O fQCX'OU)
• C O ®*-ie* 4^4J->-BUIE
Wi— OC > +J S Ul O — U O ~O -P (-
C -^ •»- • ID O O U +J - +J * 5 C 0) *» -^ ffl
-^ O O O — ui -P ui O C Q vi * *j ui — -P — E -P
^•PQU t- o o "+• o o OUa>0) t3 3CV1 +J t_ C

(A  u » OL o ut o>£. o y i-
OC3  © UI . trt tfl — * ® O •
r— J£ Q Q M ^ E •*• "O "C ^ "O I*O Q)tn<^OtC30}-P-PO.>
O °-W O-C *~U-*-^-^Q4rf Q
^ : o o
O 0 O O -
•• » •• o
— * O *O CM
CO V C7V CM
o o
§
« * ^. ° "°
^ 0 ^ 0^ S *"
O • V
• o
O v
V
tn
o •*•* tn — » p*. *—



•
o
o o
O —i
o •


< m 1 ^ --*-• O.r-4
z ^ CM « m *•* P^—
§ ^
• o
o
§
0
r* »•*> fS **, CM —
i—t m i tn o in i— '
o ** 3 "*" r^ ***
0
T O

0
in r-i

7-x ?«
1 S^ • «- '
° S
o o
v v

(M
o *•*
1 O — * O 1
C9 *^

O O O O
LJ_ U_ U. U>


CM
tn i_i
a
•P "O
Ul O
, I S
"*• !• +A +J tfl L.
O g at f a h-

« ° • M = " °"
•»- O O O G O
3 a
3-3

-------



u
%
JO
1
-J
s
£
I
Vt
Vt
§
1
|
°;
I
1
3
1
1
t-l








ml
*s
8

"c
C
J


V
c
1
H*
s





V
4
I
j
C
i
I
1
V
C
C
o
+* -i
o-^
o i
4^ •*-
a-
Oetecte
Ranoe
c
Detect*
L1mlt<
o
e>
Q
§
$:
°
O
I
o
©
1
en

x
u
•o
o
^f 1 o.c x e «
Ul O W) • ^ •*•* • O "O a**- ffltw^h >»
* E E S_ e -o c to « ^- '« 8 J3 e •  o •-• o m ja o £• ja o ^ O o
•o u 8  3 OU • t» U >••»& N-^r^a N-f^aO'QOTg
OLtCOO t* IAwt—Q ^3' •^44^0 *~J3+*Q) O CD Q **• Q
rn >o vrt
^00 « 0 0 ^000
^ r-i 03 m ui
cvj rr» » ~« ^

<^ II II
z ~

ss 25 AS 29 sg
-I*' J, " rt " ~" O ~
s ^

<5 ' ' ' '
^1^ i? IN ^«>-4 m^H
co^» in*- r*«^ o"^ ****
"* r^

1 II II

i i • 23 •
£ £ £ , £ £
a 1
5 I 1-3
'-' « c 2 S
ac V **•*
5 r-l E t.
£ ^ 2 & S o
" £ o e i I 1
03 ffi f— C J3 5
8,3 i U S i S ^
•1° ^ a >. c C 5
IE ^ fe •= * <
tf & r- 5 *» a O
e£ : I s t -5 -s
c c "ex -
J"^ ^r^0 +JO ,0
a a ^
3-4

-------











y
^
fl
UJ
|



->
1=

.5
£

.»—
g
V)
(O
en

3E
UJ



t—
CO
g
1
ft
S
^
=|


5
^j
i
f
A
UJ
i











in



E
g
C
U
c
£
>2
a
C
o
— in
•*•* -t-
m CD §
*c 1"
c
*"
u.
S 0) CO
Q. 4-> C

-M o:
a
c
O
*~ "!
~ HI
m 4* *•
E ffl _
-x a
c
e
C "O
c o a
u c
55
0
c
o
— •£ u
E y *

c +* *-
— o~
o
«c -3 c
r« uc
rr Si
1 r
(— ffl
^ e


r-
t- C
O +J
OJ in
CD C
O "*
at
O h

U • (A O C O
01 o — . c in o o
(n -M ««r o &•*- (/) •*-*
cn"c-S2ln3i«u-S

u in * •»- c c *r- +J -o
a a O>M- s ^ o S eg
o a oooJuu-^e+J
i^O^'K 3 ^— -^ O
r* g *~ 

••o o>».o'g-^ocBC
eootn 'c ^j u 1/J ^ in "*" •
I-H c c u_ O yu3 utDp-t/)
O -^ Q O3.QOt.3Z
* fl O "0 -M U E -P 0.x. |
SC^r*»(DCDUO(DX O)Q
^-4 -M X -P Q 0 U Q . CO >»
r*- i— r- ^-
m c me
CM O CM O

0 °
eo ^ .. ..

o m co


o *-» i *«» t •-*•
' A 3 r"' — ^ ^
• o o
0 V V
y . .



t III


0 - - O
• r*
CM •
s= 15 '
• i— « i •
o
v O
V


s i

01 a.
• •
i i t S i 2
CN ^ CM «-•
• •
V V

1 ' i i
_

O O C3 C3
LL> U. U. u.

S "
r-i t— i
1" ? S
ui ^ 15 ^ _
t *» Q *^
CG 3 CJ* +*
•»• "W "O
f-i C 0) Q> T3
i-t £E U N CO
<_J t- -^ U
_3 III T
^ U. « »— »—
S .- 8 S. 5
CO ^i * '
E if O O O
•*• a >

3-5

-------













u
*
19


S
~

'n
o
u.

*;
§

o
tn
to
3


i


8
^
g
£
|»5
>.
S
|

S
H
s
*
*-«
Ul
a!
t












*
c






=
L
a
CE



ffT
_, -C
c

UL.







tn

c
c


C



§
— V

ol

a a
O Q
4-* C
ui

&*
o
§
— u
§w
*» —
s —



•o
* 0
y i
o
Q


oT
»•
i
c

a
K

I«

O *i
I =

^
S|
4«* B
f
II
VI






>%•£
U s
O 4J
Ol I/
e o
+>i-
a*
§J
o £
O U)
w g "O Of
2 in Co 2. £
=K— -^ +J O C * * Ul
'CU*-C*T> u in -o Si

C C -O X L(_ CL  tf) E UJ »
oiuoai x.* a*
O^COUCO Q >»"O 4J U. "O

Q3(-OX**-C UCOOUO
P ti_ o a o o -^- h- d u_ u QL u.
o o o o o o
•• ••
,-4 CSt


rn
i «
i m «-«
9



i i

r—
"o)

^
• *-* ^ i— •
0 ^ Z*-
s


o
V


i s




~
z ^




i

u. u_





i— i n
srt in ut
03 3
I i S
WO 0
el I
*l- 1-
= a s

00 0
4^ Ul
^* C
§ 1
O U)
C v
O g
u
s * .

A U)
Ul <0 C
4J 4V O
o o 'ui
r- -g |
*« c

O Ut 44,
3 in u
«~ o o
fl ^- 4J
> 0
o> -o
III

« tn u)
o ut
j= in u f2
3 O t-
»- » 0
C > it. o
0 O i-
•o* o S> i. •§
Q) t. C O +4
o 2"1" 1 v
Q. O C O
U f- $ o
4J C I- h- C
0 X 0 •*-
c S -o >

o ui 3 u) .e
u c
Sin ui o ui
•»• o -^ 4^
Ul Ul ••-
*-
L. fc. O
0 88. S fe
| °5 5 |
*e c 44
4J O * O O
O 0*0 f
1-4 in e
Ul (O Ul
<0 Ul f 4-*
x . — -M • e
•D MO
M O M in +j tn
•"• 4J C M •*- O
M y _o ^o e t.
^_ 44 *UI *"" ^ O
fl O « T3 L.
19 "g f O O
MO *- O)
a*— o 4-» e
O O U U tl
3 > i— U o t-
•0 O XI 3 4J
CJ *- (0 OO £
O 4J Ul "O U
-O O O *0
O «> 4J J=
i— t_ o e 4>» >
A O T> O O
«a > .e t. r—
= "g1 «« 5
5 -S> Si .
19 <0 O O
ox: x: M ui
20) in o o
c tn ui f
O *0 O O O +)
V — L. O 1- X! C
U « 4-* O O
m M 3 e u P— T
4-> •-• O MO fl XJ C
f0 Ul 4J U O. 
-------
•source  category are discussed  in  detail, in Section 3.2.   For  each  source
 category  the  total  number of facilities tested is shown,  as  is  the  type of
 sample.   The  ranges  of detected emissions  and  detection limits  are shown for
 the  2378-TCDD isomer,  PCDD's,  and PCDF's.  The  column labeled  "Detected
 Range"  represents  the range of average concentrations reported by different
 literature references.   If  only one  value  is shown  it  represents the average
 value of  all  tests for one  unit.  The  number  of sources having  detectable
 emissions is  shown  in parentheses  under the range values.  Detection limits
 are  shown in  the column labeled "Detection Limits"  when a source had less
 than detectable  PCDD or PCDF emissions.  The number of  sources  having  less
 than detectable  emissions is shown in parentheses under  the detection limits.
 Comments  are  provided  if the  results  were affected  by such things  as
 contaminated  fuel,  upset operating  conditions,  or  use of a  nonspecific
 analytical technique.   In the table, the source categories  r.re ordered by the
 highest value of the  PCDD emissions  range.
     PCDD's and  PCDF's  were  not found  in  stack emissions from all combustion
 sources.  Utility  boilers  firing  PCB-spiked waste  oil, a lime  kiln,   a
 coal-fired utility  boiler,  and the  incinerator ship M/T Vulcanus had less
 than detectable  PCDD  and  (if analyzed for)  PCDF emissions.
     In general, where combustion  sources did  .emit  PCDD's  or PCDF's,  these
 emissions appeared  to be dependent  on  the types of fuel  or  wastes being
 fired,  and whether or  not  the  combustion unit was  designed  and operated
 specifically  to  achieve  the  destruction  of potentially hazardous wastes
 including PCDD's and PCDF's.   However, sampling  and analysis methods  and
 facility design  and  operation  may  vary considerably between  studies, which
 makes direct  comparisons  of  emissions  test data  difficult.  For most of the
 sources tested,  the  magnitude  of  PCDD emissions  was  comparable to the
 magnitude of  PCDF emissions.   Most  of the  studies  analyzed  samples for
 PCDD's; some  studies  quantitated 2378-TCDD and the  PCDF homologues as well.
 Samples were  taken  primarily at the stack  outlet location and not at the
 control device  inlet.   The  range of measured  PCDD  and PCDF concentrations
 varies from one to four orders of magnitude.
                                     3-7
-------
     Municipal  solid  waste incinerators  were the most  frequently tested
source  and  had the  highest levels  of PCDD's  and  PCDF's in  stack gas
emissions.  Facilities located in Europe had higher PCDD emissions than North
American facilities.  Commercial  boilers  co-firing  spiked waste oil had the
next highest PCDD concentration in stack gas emissions, followed by emissions
from  one tested  unit  combusting PCP-treated  wood.   However,  another
combustion  unit designed  to  incinerate PCP-treated  wood had  less than
detectable  PCDD or PCDF  emissions.   Of the  remaining source  categories
tested,  sewage  sludge incinerators,  hospital Incinerators,  and two rotary
kiln hazardous  waste incinerators had the next  highest PCDD  emissions,
respectively.
     Emissions data for the 2378-TCDD  isomer  were available  for five source
categories.   Municipal waste incinerators had the highest stack emissions  of
2378-TCDD, followed by  a  fluidized bed system used to regenerate  activated
carbon,  and  an  industrial boiler.  One coal-fired  utility boiler and  the
incinerator ship  M/T Vulcanus had nondetectable  levels of  the 2378-TCDD
isomer.
3.1.2  Summary of Ash PCDD and PCDF Emissions
     Table 3-2  presents a summary of data on the PCDD and PCDF content of
combustion ash samples available in the literature.  The data for each source
category are discussed in detail in Section 3.2.  As  in Table  3-1,  Table 3-2
shows the number of facilities tested  and  the type  of sample.   The range of
detected emissions and detection limits for the 2378-TCDD  isomer,  PCDD's and
PCDF's are  also shown for each  source category.  The source categories  are
ordered by the highest value of the PCDD range for each category.
     PCDD's and PCDF's  were not found  in  ash samples from all  combustion
sources.  Three rotary kilns,  thirteen coal-fired boilers, two diesel cars, a
lime kiln, and a sewage sludge incinerator had less than detectable levels of
PCDD's or PCDF's (if analyzed for) in ash"or particulate samples.
     A  rotary  kiln  operated  without  supplemental   fuel  fired  in  the
afterburner had the  highest  PCDD concentration  in  particulate samples.
However, these  results  were skewed high by the use of a nonspecific GC-MS
packed  column  analytical   method.   The same  rotary  kiln  operated  with
                                     3-8
-------









u
Q
4^
 J
Q ~
•a
o c
4-> d
c
o
i- U

Si
CD 1i
O



•a
CD CD
4-> C
u c
5 it
4-> a.
CD
a
e
•2 u
o •<•

CD _
a

"S 0
•4^ C
% Z
4-1 a:
CD
o
CD
t— fl
fc

^,
01










I—
U. <
O 4-
o> ui
CD 1
4-> 1-
IO
0 <•
CD PJ
II
(/> i—
O) • 1
— T3 r- >,^ n_ TJ
JIO- <». i— E O CD
£ Ik. Ul r- 31 c 
'OO4-)OC'O *-w O4JCDC
CD'^g34J^> O CCBCDC

uico'ta UICDCDC c O'ocDQ.fl'^
5.  _l <-4->


r3Cr--oa>«ir— 0) a. CD c 00.4^*0.00
SIOCDL. CD4-> Q. I- !- OVICECi—
>«CU).CO3t4- 3-*-3 OSiOtlO'O

o o o «o
CM CM CM O  •— 4J
•»- i— i c i— i (O *0 r— i
U ^ CD ^-4 4J 1— 1 L. CO
c t_i E i_ic —4 CD u-i
^ CD CD i— ' C
C r— C € "*" ^
+i -^ Q. *»-.— CDC —
U^3 ^O. C*-l ^

* >• _ >< 3 30, >.
^ O ^ X S-^ 4^
So o a o o
-c ce or i- i ce
NO O O O O
1C
i

























•




•o
CD
3
C
•M
C
O
u
"





































3-9
-------













u

.0

la
1

H-t
_J
to

p

e
j<
g


§

5

3?


JiT
g
£j
?s
§.

fc
g;

21
5
^.^
o
w
z

5
o

CM
1
ff\
Ul
i
<
i-




































^

o
c

i








c
c
c
**
c
g







*3
o
c

d
P
f*~
CO
r-
a




























Ul

g»
" 2
c

d
£
L»
 ^
d-



^
® g
O C
Q) *C
•M CC

a
c
o
T- Ul
+* +
^ 3
CD _
O


03 03
+J O
y ^
CD (1
4^ o:
CD
a

Q)
r— 0)
fg
?
H
«






r—
O •«

CO <
3-

0) r-
= 1

<^ t
in as O at- • o

L.'MU) "^ "OO X"^ ^5°°®
Cm*®  ^^ c ° t? u
3) O »— *~" ot. & n)-P rn^CM

£ T3 0) « O *O CJ*
T- 0 Q3 O •• ® ® "»"X CO CO (V^
* CM X ^~ ^3 fi« CM Q£ +* 	 f © Q >^ * •""* * O
CJt CJV l/J »-< O* CM
o o •• o •• o * *


\o r** ^^ CM ^^ ^^ ^r **^ ^*



i iii iii


§ ^6
O ^.
• 0 o
o c P» o
*° ° « ^ ~. ° ^»
• ^ OCM O^ • >H ^ir»«CMI
CM*' CTl — • •-» i-l— | >_i m ^4
i « m «» m — i —
o o I"- e» o
rH «— 1 • •"<
r- I --H
• CM
<-t r~
g
V CM 1 1 1 < N 1 1

V



o r~- o ' 03
^ tf^ tf) •
CTlCM 1 1 • JH mO^CM^'^
1* "^ *^ CM —• CM— • ^
•«• • • CM
CM O VO
rn



I ill ill





C3
O -~ CM —
<0 CM 1 1 1 1 •-• 1
1 -^ in —
Ov
in


Ul T3
tj S. "3 in -"

^ 1 m To
m 
L. , K IO C Ul
O I CD «J CD
»T ^^ g*
Ul r- O • fl
c it t.  et
(Q C 3 • 
-------






u

JD
a
UJ
|
UJ
£^


UJ

K
0£
U.
g
CO
1
to
to
t— t
2
X
s

Q

Q.


§

&
K

i
V7


Q

Z
H-4
o


B
CM
rr>
UJ

1—

















in
•p
i
§
1
u
c
£



a

e
O
— in
y *•
-~ ID E
c +•> •£
^ ID _

~
u.
Q -o
£ 58
o 
a
c
o
— "*
"a u £
^v  •»-
C CD —
— O
a
S
oo 2S
I— o e

OJ
a
ID
f"~ c

£




rn

i- a
O 4-

•P H-
o *»
CJ t
t- +J
§^
Ol I— 1
>« • i -o
•O i— CJ "O E 0)
c c uj re re N
re o I ^s +•> ><
• in O ID a> o 're
Q O) > C U C
So >> re — re
r- .0 J= I- t.
r- o o o -p in
Z i a> >,•— .0 CM
QQr- -O ^ +-> *J Q . pJ
vgcjc aj}*^-ocmO
o>
o o o

CM CM ~ O\
\o •£> in

o
»
i i i —>

o

o
V

i

,~.
^
o
I i 4^O) 0)O
« — -a o «i
3 r— C • lOf— 3r—
•»- re in in 4^ o re
O) o o>^ • c s O)*^
c i_coo>5 c u
•^ ••- -c Q.H" >> re -^3
•«- -Q +J E i— -P "--0
oo»-oocu oc
O E » 0 Z O O O —

o o - o
•• •• re

oo m en



i ii






^ •—• o *^ in *^
P~ ^H O —• >O i-l
• — ' m ~ CM —
m




I i I








•""( »~4 ^3 i^ UD ^













I II




^ ^ <
U. U. U.

UJ UJ I—I
t- t. 1— 1
O 0}
^ ^ o
(2 eg tj

i— r- ID
2 5

(J t« (J
o tn >f
O w ' +J

"a
o o ' «i
3




i
























•o

3


•p
§

"

































.3-11
-------















u

JO

S

M
— J

JE
3
cr
LU
fS
0
en
1

e/)
CO
i
-j-
c/i
K
|
5

Ou
&
i
31
to
o
2
P-
^E
§

,
CM
1
m





















ifi
+j
c
9
e
8
o
u
^


c

"*" "1
II
CO Z
a

•a
g> o
+•> c

*> (X
o
a
§
•^ Ul
|!


TQ
•S c
ID 1



i2o<
II
CO










>«T
en u
ID 0
3*
ID i—
O «
•- •*
>. O
ID . •— -P
> -0 c
10 m O t.
Jr +1 0 «-
<0 C •- O
>, c  QL e .
•• ^ E U) A O ^
r~ 3 e •— a)


^o p N +J i— a
S"^ "O 3 


i i





m -^
1 o •-•
1—4 ^






1 1



0
t— 4
CM
r- T eo i-<
O CM T '-'
0 ^
•
o
1

O O CM 1
°.°.~

o
CM
o ~> «
1 in LTI -H
f-4 #-4 CM *-*
a~
0

C3
S t
* £
n
S
a
Ul •^i
0 a
§ £ rn
w e i-i
^ G L.
i  ui ui a>
J -r-
tn js ui a>
to> * o > •
> -o a. ^
(D E O (D
m N o i— i N
0 E ° e £"
00*0 co 5 «- io o **• *o


.. o •• o
en ro
rf ~t CM
CM CM IO


1 1 1






1 1 1






1 1 1



0
•»
"^in ^0 ? CM

^ m •— • m
0

m
1 1 0 CM
o ""
V



CO ^* *t "^
o> m • o o
. — • — 1 —4 -Z
CM ~»


•M +J 01
m !o *" « -5
JJ L. 4J t- <3>
•— +J i— -p a
-- X — X 1-
U. LU U. Ul U
CO





r— l
O r— i
Ul) t-< CM
C f— 1 I— 1 t— 1
C fO
*" »— t in je.
in ra u
4! S "• 2
ll " "§ *~
^ ^S r—
Q ID IO O
r- -O 0) U)
f n) p- a>
ja 
10
ID
— J

o




•

c
o
^

u
in

£2


o
m

CM


1






1



-------














u


IO
LU
oc


rf



t— (
_J

X
I—
|



£

Q

CO

HH
cn
CO
«g
UJ
i
Li_
8
Q.
*>.
O

nTj

&
>••





CO

3

Z
1—4
z
8


CM

m
LU '
s



























Ul
-H

c

C
8
e
2
CD
u-

as.










o
c
c
U.


^




C
o
•— Ul
•p +J
O f-
CD E

d1


•p
CD CD
•p a
S i
•p a:

a






"c
^
c
e
1




c
o
— in
y ^

«3
o

CD ID
•P C
^
•P CK
CO
a







c


c

oo
r~


c
o
•S ir


•p •>-
«§-


^
5S
Si
4-s o:
ID
Q

CD
.— a
a. a
1£
CO













r—
^•a
I- CO
o -p
o> in
CD o
•p 1-
10
0 *l
CO f-
Hi
3 C
CO I—
• in «*•
>S d
r- -0 O .
C Q -O f- -O 4J
O jC (D ^ U* ID C
•*-» e e ui o.o 44 
c ^ •.— « «*• c c ^*5
u +j * $ "Z £ *^ 5
3§fe4-t.».4Jk+j min
V, OCOU-U.Ot--P"- IO3
a -paoco3CD-o -a
PCD'-cjO-Poyic x
c*^mr^CDyA>o p— >>


.. o •• 0 O o
m t a ..
o co co ^ ^
1-4 i-t in CN CM








II lit







,0 ~ OO -»
^d ^i ' ' '





in
CM
o
I • I in 2 < S < S
O --" Z «-* Z *^
C3
O
V


'.9 i i i
0








II III






II 1 II



• in in
•P 3 -P CD
< L. o in < ^
U. 10 ^3 LU Ul
a. oi-o «e
(O





Cl
c

rc
u
r-i X
—< C

u
=1 c
On i-
•^ f-4
•P UJ I— 1 (I
(Q »-* C
Ed i— i -c
It r- 3
r- -r- a i—
u ^ i— cn
C£ -P ^ ID
c c
co co an
u ' S 6 a
^- a f- a
M c3 — I cnj

_. f
c -P ^
^ 5- c
Q. C O

2 = 1J
u CD in
m ° i
4J CD
Ul &-
3 O CD
IO <4- r—
"X u> "S
LU -P -P
in u
r_ co o
CD -P -P
r— CD
<4- r— T3
14- •—
3 (O c
M- jr
no -P

en co in
c 3 in
T- r— Q>

10 >
1- O)
U CO C
CO O) •*-

•P CO 5
o >
ro IO Ul
L. CD
-P CD • U •
X f Ul L. Ul
LU -P CD 3 C
3 O O
CO -P 10 Ul
+J C > <4- U|
r— CD O ••-
•r- in co E
LU CO O) C. CD
1- C CO
S 8-S | 5
nj t- 3 .a
i— eg c 10
u *^* 4*> CO y

•PCI- 1- -P
t. X CO CO
IB O •O "0
a. .c c •
in 3 in e
II C IO
Ul Ul O £
4J ••- CO — +J
u ui in
10 CD Co in in
X 13 c CO i—
LU > CO
i. CD I-
« B § a i °
o +j c -P i2
O -^ X"- O J3
•O LU r— CO IO
C C -P -P
•p •« o x co o

C *— >4- f 4J
CL N-4 Ul C CO
in E 10 -o
IO IO Ul -C
X ui • i- -p • o>
•o ui c
in in co in in -p •*-
•^3 +J c in i- >
Ul O O O CO E iO
>, co co ^ i— — . .e
•— in -P in r-
10  i— U CD M-
10 in Co -O 3 -P O
O <0 i— IB O CO
CO .C 4J Ul -O L.
^ CL CD U .0
O} co fo CD .a
CD CO IO .p " £i E
r- -P I- CO C +S §
.a 10 co ~o co «c
IO i— > J= L.
r— 3 iO O) X CO Ul
••- O C "O ••—
10 TJ "a *~ c c


IB CO •££ JZ Ul U)
2LX. O) Ul CO CO
CM Ul .C


• t- IO +J CO CD
IO-P U13 c 1.-OI—
•pu vo tnco >a CD ^
ion in-pi- a. +J 
ui t. i. •— u a <
Ul «C CO C CO
C "" -S OC ^3 V-P
iO>> COE »-X E O O
Sf— *»3 +»O 3 Z Z
u_ oc y^: c
CD co in u u
= 11 +-> O +J CO
i co ^ . eg in .c o <:
— LU IO ^ U *O CO
3-13
-------
supplemental  fuel  had  significantly  lower  PCDD  levels  in particulate samples.
PCB fires  had the  second  highest  PCDD  concentration  in  soot  samples, and also
had the  highest PCDF levels.  Unlike flue gas  samples, the  level  of PCDD's
found  in  ash  samples were less than PCDF  levels for most  of the combustion
sources  where both PCDD's  and  PCDF's  were analyzed for.  Municipal  waste
incinerators  had  the next highest concentrations of PCDD's  in  ash samples.
In general,  European  facilities  had higher  levels  of PCDD's  than  North
American or Japanese facilities.   However, two  European facilities had less
than detectable PCDD's in  ash  samples.   North American  facilities  had  higher
PCDF levels  in ash samples  than  European  facilities.   A natural  gas-fired
residential heater had the next highest PCDD levels in fly  ash emissions,
followed by  a commercial  boiler co-firing  used automobile oil  spiked with
organic compounds,  and a  hospital incinerator.   Residential  woodstoves  had
detectable levels  of PCDD's  in ash samples, but some of the  fuel was reported
to have  been  potentially contaminated.   Other source categories  having
detectable levels  of PCDD's or PCDF's  in  particulate  or  ash samples  were
activated carbon regeneration, automobile  emissions, wire  reclamation,  and a
cement kiln.
     Concentration  data for the 2378-TCDD  isomer were  available for ash and
soot taken from seven  source categories.   A rotary kiln burning tars, solid
waste, and natural  gas and  operated  without supplemental fuel being  fired  in
the afterburner had the highest concentration  of  2378-TCDD  in  particulate
samples.  However,  the same  rotary kiln had less than detectable emissions of
2378-TCDD when  supplemental  fuel  (tars and natural  gas)  was fired  in  the
afterburner.  PCB  fires had  the second  highest  concentration of 2378-TCDD  in
soot samples followed  by a fluidized bed combustion  system used to regenerate-
activated  carbon.   Municipal  waste  incinerators  had  the next highest
detectable levels of 2378-TCDD in fly ash samples, followed  by filter extract
samples from  vehicles  burning  leaded and unleaded gasoline.   Other  sources
having detectable  levels  of 2378-TCDD  were a natural gas-fired  residential
heater and residential  woodstoves.   Particulate matter samples  from a tar
burner had less than detectable levels of 2378-TCDD.
                                    3-14
-------
3.2   EMISSIONS  DATA  FOR  INDIVIDUAL  SOURCE  CATEGORIES
      In  this  section,  the available PCDD/PCDF emissions data for  individual
source  categories are  discussed.   Sections  3.2.1 through  3.2.12  cover
municipal  solid waste  incinerators, sewage sludge incinerators, fossil  fuel
combustion,  wood combustion,  boilers co-firing  wastes,  hazardous  waste
incinerators,  lime/cement kilns,  hospital  incinerators,  wire  reclamation
incinerators,  PCB  fires, automobile  emissions,  and  activated   carbon
regeneration  furnaces,   respectively.   Various  experimental  studies  are
discussed  in Section 3.2.13.
3.2.1  Municipal Solid Waste Incinerators
     Table  3-3  presents  the emissions  data  for  municipal  solid  waste
incinerators.
      In  1978,  TCDD's were detected in the emissions from the Hempstead
municipal  waste incinerator  (MWI)  on  Long  Island.   Since that date,  this
source category has  received considerable attention  in  the  United States.
The Canadian Government  has  identified MWI's  as  one  of the major combustion
sources of  PCDD's  in the Canadian environment.73  Numerous tests  have  also
been conducted  in Europe  and Japan.
     MWI's can be classified as either large  mass burn  units, refuse derived
fuel  (RDF) units, or small modular  units.  There are approximately 43 facili-
ties with modular units,  45 mass  burn  facilities and  8  RDF boiler  facilities
currently  operating  in  the  United  States  and Canada.3   The  mass  burn
facilities are responsible for the majority of waste burned.
     This section summarizes the PCDD  and PCDF flue gas emissions and fly ash
content data for MWI's operating  in  North America  (including Canada),  Europe
and Japan.   It  is based  upon  a review of  the available  literature  that
reports emissions studies of CDD  and CDF  emissions  from MWI's.   Thirtyeight
articles were reviewed and approximately 70 percent of the emission
studies were found in various journal  articles and from  reports published  by
government and state environmental agencies.
      Resource Recovery Activities, Citv Currents.  April 1985.
                                    3-15
-------























pr
1
g



uj


^£
3:
Q

3
o?
a!
»-*
o




*•



i
UJ

^



,
m
i
en
UJ
S
1




















Ul
» to
(-11.
en
. » • TT - CO
in co g co r-
2 *"" ' cj> O •-> O (O ^
. \O O> —< CM »
p-l«»Tin ,»COCM » *"'
^o^4CM cft^^ocM r^ inSS

^ « •» * «
CMCM^O^ r^-oCMO en CM f— < 5 •--*
en o\ ~t "i •» i-- o> CM •« ^ i~. ^ t^
00 0
o o <-H r-
o en *~* en en ^*
. S >A oo E •• -a
CM^, eno. »v.^o. i
CM en i a. o\ en i a.
ic in i c  a. o> a.
c a. co.
i
 o-
cn a.
c lit
CO


en CM



O < C3 < <
u. u. u. u- 1*-


"
O rH 00 r-1 CM
^H CM en



-

CO
1 j
H-I (E 03
z1 £ p S
t* I. <- 0
G = Jt



















































Ul
C
o

la

13
U

U

c
2
o
N
. O
§'" ^ Z
u. u.
= II « '
I o < i
e u. u. n
3-16
-------
      Emissions data are  available for 66  MWI  facilities.  Sixty-two  are
 reported to utilize an  electrostatic precipitator  to  control  particulate
 matter emissions  from  flue gases.  Twenty-nine of the facilities are located
 in  the United  States and  Canada,  34 in Europe,  and 3 in Japan.
      3-2-1-1   United States and Canada.   PCDD emissions from stack testing of
 14  facilities  located  in  North America ranged  from not detected  (ND)  to
 22,000 ng/m .   PCDF stack  emissions  for 13  facilities  ranged  from ND  to
 15,060 ng/m .   Detection  limits  were  not specified.  Both  of  these upper
 emission values were  reported  in an  EPA study of  a modular incinerator
 located in  Langley,  VA.   It is characterized as being  susceptible  to  upsets
 caused by grass clippings or because of wet-refuse stored in an  open  pit.92
 Two facilities are known  to emit low levels of PCDD's  (35 to 146 ng/m3)  and
 PCDF's (50  to  246 ng/m ).  One is a modular unit  equipped with  a secondary
 chamber for combustion of off gases  and  the other  uses  RDF that  is stored in
 a silo and  is  very dry when combusted.49'174
      The PCDD  content  of  fly ash samples from 24  MWI's  ranged from <0.5  to
 2,300 ppb.  PCDF's from 13  facilities  ranged from  <0.5 to  3,100 ppb.
      3.2.1.2   Europe.  Flue gas emissions of PCDD's from eight MWI's located
 primarily in  Italy ranged from ND to  48,900 ng/m3.   Flue gas emissions of
 PCDF's  from seven  facilities ranged from 37  to 7,460 ng/m3.  The  highest PCDD
 and  PCDF emissions were reported  for six MWPs located in  the Lombardy region
 of  northern Italy.    The report contained  no  information describing feed
 composition,  combustion  design  or operating  conditions.   However,  each
 facility does  utilize  an ESP.
      The PCDD  content  of fly  ash  samples  from 31 facilities  ranged  from <0.5
 to 3,540 ppb while PCDF's from 19 facilities ranged from  ND to  1,770 ppb.
 Detection limits were  not specified.
      3.2.1.3   JajDan.   The PCDD content of fly ash samples from two facilities
 ranged from 2.4 to 4.8 ng/g.
 3.2.2  Sewaoe  Sludge Incinerator*;
      Table  3-4 presents emissions data from two studies of sewage  sludge
 incineration.   '  5  An unpublished  study reported emissions from  a  single
multiple hearth  sludge incinerators with a water scrubber.235   Operating
                                    3-17
-------

















ac
o
i
z
i
»-«
3
s


UJ
£


.£
Q£
§
pj
*C
O
§
«/>
.
T

UJ
1
























in
o
O)
it.
ID
CC







s
4J
§
u
d
1C
to
£.
If
•C
C
Id
C
C
4"
+-

1
8
c
c
u>
in
1
u.
,j_
g
S
§








u.
§


g,
C

CC


s
5







Q
8





09
CO
C
Id
cc






c
Id
*








1
r»
CV



CD
C
Id
cc



c
Id

3£



 a.
i 1







































s
01
c
rt)
^
M-
1
ID •
A >.
»• •o
t3 3
S -M
in
•o
c c
IO i-
E T3
in a>
v L.
X 0
o a.
•^ ID
-0 L.
e
in
ur fl
a
a >i o
•S 5 42
in i—
° a> "°
c •£ t -H
in 10 u
ST) $
a> in 4->
§+J O 
-------
 temperatures were  reported  to be in  excess of 1,000°C with a feed rate of 13
 to  15.5  short  tons/hour.  The results were not reported in terms of specific
 homologues, only  references to  "CDD's" and  "dibenzofurans"  were made.  For
 three  sample  periods flue  gas  samples contained "CDD's"  ranging from 483
 ng/m   to  l,140ng/m  with  an  average of 739  ng/m3.   "Dibenzofuran"
 concentrations  in  flue  gas  samples ranged from 501  ng/m3 to 2,248 ng/m3 with
 an  average of 1,213 ng/m3.   No detection limits were  specified for these
 unpublished results.
     The second study    analyzed emissions from  incineration of  aerobic
 sludge.   Fly ash was collected by means of "dust abatement",  organic  vapors
 were trapped with  a water condenser,  and  ashes  from  the combustion process
 were collected by grab  sample.  The  investigators reported PCDD's to be
 "absent" from  both "ashes"  and "fumes."   Detection  limits and information on
 the incinerator were not  reported.
 3.2.3  Fossil  Fuel Combustion
     Table 3-5  presents  the emissions data from fossil  fuel-fired combustion
 units.
     3.2.3.1   Coal  Combustion.   Haile et  al_.    have  reported results from
 research conducted as  part  of a nationwide study of  organic emissions from
 utility  coal combustion.  Results were reported  for four of the seven  plants
 comprising the  complete  survey.  Samples  analyzed included samples from the
 flue gas outlet (downstream of  the particulate emissions  control  device), fly
 ash emissions,  and coal  feed.   PCDD  and  PCDF homologues were not identified
 in  any sample  from  the  four coal-fired  plants.   To  maximize  the'method
 sensitivity, all samples  were  analyzed using  five-day composites.  Detection
 limits for PCDD and PCDF  homologues  in the flue  gas analyses  were 0.25 ng/m3
 for mono through tri-CDD; 0.10  ng/m3  for  tetra-CDD; 0.50  ng/m3 for  penta-CDD
 and hexa-CDD;  and 0.70 ng/m3 for hepta- and octa-CDD.   For solid  feed and fly
 ash samples, detection limits for the  PCDD and PCDF homologues were ,025 ng/g
 for mono-  through  tri-CDD;  .010 ng/g  for TCDD;  .050 ng/g  for penta-  and
 hexa-CDD; and .070 ng/g for hepta and octa-CDD.
                      97
     Harless and Lewis    tested  fly  ash samples  from  seven coal-fired  power
plants  and found the samples had non-detectable levels of TCDD  at an average
                                    3-19
-------






















35
0

IMB
CO
=>
ag
2j
f*^

LU
i>

i
1-4
CO
CO
o
U.


^-B
cc
8
UJ
<
0

ci
25
8
co

^
in
ro
UJ
h-















tn
CD
o
C
CD
U
CD
CD
o:


•H
CD

C.
o
CJ
CD
Q
E
 O> W in CM vOCTi VO
i-l i-H
in
r-i
i— 1


II III 1 1 1 1 1





U U
a o ill o i a o i
z z z z z







II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1



l«_
CD O)
O) V.
-s. 0)
re .a JD xj o) c
§0000 i co i
= Z == 00 S
vO t*^
rH




II III 1 1 1 1 1



O)

D)
O Q O C
II III Z Z 1 Z
.
0


^j
C3< <<< C3 I- CD C3 <
U. U. U.U.U. LL. re U. U- U.
a.



c c
CD CD
^ rf "O <  =}
CO CO


1^" ^
a CD
^ O •— L»- <— • •—
re t_ i_ • o """Q -^ in 10
c3 5 ,2 =£ "§ ° 2 -S& OP
^_ ^_ <4_ U] N "O T3 CD C
>, U OOr-«C-^ C C ^S^®
4JCD CD m 3 t- « * -«-£re-o
il-r:- COJZCDr- U_ *- "~ £
f o »

Q
o u
?£
•p -a
O. CD
CD N
X >»
r"»

o c
^^ iO
V .
re >.
X i—
CD C
X O
"*"





^
r- L.
C O
0 CD <*-
P
0 r^ I)
O 3 N
1— O >•
•f— 1—
oo +•* re
r^ t- c
rn re re
CM a.
P
«- jc o
o u c
^ re
•P 0
U) U) O
•^ O
U) •• 1
>» « re
r— P P
re i- c
c re CD
<|
O r—
c -a c
CD O
UJ P
re ^ re
g-P U
CD tn
•o
I |g
= re ja
3-20
-------
 detection  limit of  0.002  ng/g.   Also, in  an  unrelated study, DeRoos  and
 Bjorseth    analyzed  one fly ash  sample collected  from a coal-fired  combustion
 unit  for TCDD's.   None were detected at a  detection  limit  of 0.002  ng/g.
      These  results  are in agreement  with those reported  by Kimble  and
 Gross   who  analyzed stack-collected fly  ash  from a typical commercial coal
 combustion  facility   burning  a  low  sulfur,  high  ash coal.   The  chlorine
 content of  the input coal was 50  ug/g and the sample was taken downstream
 from  the electrostatic precipitator.  At a detection limit  of 0.0006 ng/g,
 TCDD's were not detected.  Kimble  and Gross  conclude that a  fossil-fueled
 power plant is  not  a  large  source  of TCDD.   This  contrasts .with  the
 conclusions presented by Dow  Chemical,  which analyzed fly  ash samples from  a
 coal-  and  oil-fired  chemical plant  powerhouse.62  The results of  the Dow
 study are presented  below  in  Section 3.2.3.2.   Kimble and Gross suggest the
 difference  in  TCDD emissions  between their  study  and  the Dow  study may  be the
 nature of the  fuel sources, including  total chlorine  content.
      Ahlberg  et al_.   analyzed flue  gas samples  from a  265  MW pulverized
 coal-fired  boiler  equipped with  an  electrostatic precipitator.  The boiler
 was firing  Polish coal  with a low  sulfur,  high ash content.   No 2378-TCDD was
 detected at detection  limits  ranging from  <5.4  to <6.8  ng/m3.  The  2378-TCDF
 isomer was  not  detected at detection limits ranging from <0.86 to <1.1  ng/m3.
    -3-2.3.2   OH  and Coal Combustion.  Particulates from the stack  of  a
 coal- and oil-fired  powerhouse at  a Dow Chemical  plant were tested for PCDD
 emissions.     TCDD,  hexa-CDD, hepta-CDD, and OCDD emissions  ranged  from 2 to
 38 ng/g' with  TCDD's  and OCDD detected at  levels of  38  ng/g  and  24- ng/g,
 respectively. The concentration  of total PCDD's  was  68 ng/g.  The 2378-TCDD
 isomer was  not detected.   Detection limits in this  study  were 20  ng/g for
 TCDD  and 10 ng/g for  2378-TCDD.  Detection  limits were  not specified for  the
 other homologues which  were analyzed by electron  capture gas  chromatography.
The study did not report fuel analysis  or operating conditions of the boiler.
     3-2-3.3  Oil Combustion.  Ahlberg  et al_.5 analyzed flue gas samples from
a 250 MW boiler fired with a  low ash,  2 percent sulfur,  heavy fuel  oil.  The
sample was  taken after the  heat exchanger and  before the  electrostatic
precipitator.   The 2378-TCDD  isomer was not detected at detection  limits
                                    3-21
-------
ranging from  <4.2  to <7.9 ng/m3.  The 2378-TCDF isomer was  not  detected  at
detection limits ranging  from <0.67 to <1.3 ng/m3.
     3-2.3.4  Natural Gas Combustion.  Dow Chemical tested participate matter
which  had been  removed  from  a  home electrostatic  precipitator in  a
residential,  natural  gas-fired  forced-air  heating system.   The  collected
material represented the  accumulation of material  from  six  spring and summer
months  of operation of the  precipitator.   The  particulate  matter sample
contained 34  ng/g  hexa-CDD,  430 ng/g hepta-CDD,  and 1,300 ng/g OCDD,  for  a
total of 1,764 ng/g.  The 2378-TCDD isomer was present at a  level of 0.6 ng/g
with a detection limit of 0.2 ng/g for the analysis.  Other  TCDD  isomers were
detected at a level  of 0.4 ng/g which was  also the detection limit for this
sample.  No detection limits were specified for the other homologues  which
were analyzed for by electron capture gas chromatography.
     3-2.3.5  Coal and Refuse-Derived Fuel Combustion.  Analysis  of flue gas
emissions from a coal and refuse-derived fuel (RDF)-fired facility located in
Ames, Iowa, found less than detectable levels of TCDD, which was the only CDD
homologue analyzed  for.115   The detection limit for TCDD  was  5  ng/m3 for
vapor samples.  This  is  a suspension fired boiler that  burns  coal  with  15
percent RDF.   Small, uniform,   2-5  cm pieces-of RDF are  produced in a
shredding and  air classification process.   The  facility operates with  a
combustion temperature  of approximately  1,200°C and produces 35 MW of
electrical power  from steam.   The  unit is  reported to be  operated  at
approximately 22  percent  excess  air  and  utilizes  an ESP.   Another  study
describing emissions testing at this facility reported that  PCDD's and PCDF's
                                       The detection limit for  PCDD  and  PCDF
were not detected in the flue gas.196
             2
was 0.25 ng/m  for vapor samples.
3.2.4  Wood Combustion
     Table 3-6  presents the emissions  data for combustion  units burning
PCP-treated wood and firewood.
     3.2.4.1  Residential Wood Combustion.  Four studies have  been  conducted
on PCDD formation from  the combustion of  firewood.54'62'165'167   Ash  samples
were collected from 24  woodstoves and two fireplaces.  The woo.dstoves  tested
were located  in rural  areas  in three  different  regions of  the county.
                                    3-22
-------













_
g
1

1;



3=
~
0
LU
L_
g

LU

K
3
to

.
*?
m
LU

1-














^j
1
S
C
CO

c
i
«
IT
i
c
J
(t
P
g
II
u
£

c
c
1/1
in
•r*
£
U

U.
Q
g
§
a
5.








a
4-
e
i*
C
c
2
S
1
a!



ll_
S








C
<£













g
^7
OC
r-
or
CS








T:
a
.t
<
H
i
C
j
U



CO
a>
c
n
K

_
5 d00? CM0"?

0 O O
o) 07 en
"OT^. c»'~ en e o> . -o _"2_"5
CtT CCMC ^«. ^** OCO OCO OCO


mm'* S S 2 P1^* SJ ^*** S •?""
CM CMCM CMvMrn^x Oi^xts T>
m m CMC) men CMO>
rH C C C


o
CM
0 C3)« .
v.r-11 ill i i i >
1 Ol— <
c ~-
lO
§


O) CO O)
O) ^J O)
C^. Cq C III 1 1 1 1
ift i-l O ^ GO
O •" • •
. -H 0
°
j_c3c3P< ^ og og
in in in uiu.Li.3U. 10 gw gin
^ <«c  o a -a r- ie a co o«o«cDr— co>
^O 10-OCD Cti-«-«-N tOUt/JS-PO -PIO
pin 'o.S"1" ™2c:c:5§+Jc-Pcco* Or-
«--o o> t3 0)+*"^'^ ~~ p O "^ O "^* t. ^
fflO V.r-O UCUO 3U)i-Oi-0+J *"
•C O *-*r-O h- OCC f— >» •*- C •*- C
5 3B U. O 3c 1 O i-" t-i U. to Q. I-H Q. i-H •
in Q.
a • • • cj ...•-•
ea °-































in
O
Tt
10
's in
u a>
r— F—
>e a.
U E
L. in t-
o o
o
2 -a
t- CD
CO CO N
N .a >>
e •—
a
O in
P *^ +•*
o
•o in c
n _ n means no data.
*Not Detected. Assume
Number In parenthesi
^Penta-CDD homologue
TCDD/TCDF scan only.
3-23
-------
 Presumably the wood being combusted was untreated, that is,  it  had  not  been
 exposed to  fungicides,  herbicides, or  wood preservatives.   For the  24
 woodstoves tested,  PCDD concentrations in ash samples ranged from 0.007 ng/g
 to  210 ng/g, with a mean concentration of 23.4  ng/g.   The  penta-CDD  homologue
 was not analyzed for.54'165   The 2378-TCDD isomer was  analyzed .for in 17
 samples.   Two samples had non-detectable levels of 2378-TCDD with detection
 limits ranging  from 0.0009 to  0.0014 ng/g.   The  other  15  samples had
 concentrations of 2378-TCDD varying from 0.001 to 0.20  ng/g  with an average
 concentration of 0.05 ng/g.   The authors  of one of the studies165 in which  18
 woodstoves were tested attributed some of the variability in the results to
 differences in woodstove design  and  sampling points.  They  also suggested
 that  some  of the  variability could  potentially  be  attributed  to  fuel
 contamination although feed  samples were  not analyzed for  PCDD content.
     Ash  samples from  the  chimneys of two fireplaces  were  analyzed for
 PCDD's.     One fireplace was  12  years old  and  one was  25 years old.  The
 25-year-old fireplace had total  PCDD  concentrations  of  44.7  ng/g including
 1 ng/g of 2378-TCDD.  Ash samples  from the 12-year-old  fireplace contained
 1.79 ng/g PCDD.  No  TCDD isomers were detected  at a detection  limit  of
 0.04 ng/g.   The penta-CDD homologue was not analyzed  for in either  of these
 samples.
     Ash  samples scraped  from  the  flue  pipe  of a  residential heater
 combusting  both oil  and wood were analyzed  for PCDD's.  After burning  only
 oil, the  PC'DD  level  in the  ash was  0.280  ng/g.   By comparison, after burning
 only wood,  the  PCDD  level was  0.97  ng/g.  After co-firing  wood and oil,  21.7
 ng/g PCDD  were detected, including 0.8 ng/g  of the  2378-TCDD isomer.  The
 penta-CDD homologue was  not analyzed for in  any of these samples.
 3.2.4.2  Treated Wood Combustion.  Chlorophenols are produced for use as wood
 preservatives,  slimacides,  bactericides,  and as starting  material  for  the
 chlorinated  phenoxy  acids 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T.   Chlorophenols  may either be
 contaminated  with" PCDD's and  PCDF's,  or  PCDD's can  be formed  by  the
dimerization  of chlorophenates  during pyrolysis.   The  following  section
discusses the  results  of several  studies  where  Chlorophenols  were combusted
with wood or wood products.
                                    3-24
-------
     Two  studies  concerned  the combustion of pentachlorophenol  (PCP)  -treated
military  ammunition  boxes.220'233   At the Los  Alamos National Laboratory  in
Los Alamos,  New Mexico,  PCP-treated wood was incinerated under a variety  of
test conditions  in a  controlled  air incinerator.220  The  incinerator had
modulated  burners, steam  injection  capability,  and enhanced  mixing of
secondary  air with the primary chamber effluent.  Ash samples were taken from
the hot zone between  the primary  and secondary combustion chambers.   Neither
TCDD's nor TCDF's were detected at  a detection  limit of  17  ng/g.
     At the  Tooele Army  Depot in  Tooele, Utah, PCP-treated ammunition boxes
and explosive-contaminated  wastes  were incinerated.233   The incinerator was
designed  to  decontaminate metal parts  containing explosive residue.   The
incinerator  has  an  unfired afterburner  (refractory  lined duct)  with a
combustion residence  time  of 0.3  seconds.  Four  tests were performed while
the incinerator was  firing:   1) no waste fuels, 2)  wood freshly coated with
PCP, 3)  40 percent by weight PCP-treated wood  and  60  percent by weight
contaminated waste  (including wood, cloth,  metal, and rubber).  Results of
the analysis of stack emissions  for two baseline tests  showed  average PCDD
emissions  of 5.0  ng/m3  and average  PCDF  emissions  of  9.82  ng/m3.   The
analysis of  stack emissions for three tests while the  40/60  mix  was fired
showed average PCDD emissions of 125  ng/m3 and average PCDF emissions of 14.2
ng/m .  Analysis of stack emissions  for three tests while freshly coated wood
was fired  showed  average PCDD emissions  of 8,215 ng/m3  and  average PCDF
emissions  of 426  ng/m .  When only ammunition  boxes were  incinerated, duct
samples were taken.   Analysis of  duct samples  showed  PCDD emissions of
1,420 ng/m  and PCDF emissions of 587 ng/m3.
     A pilot scale incinerator was used to burn  wood chips which  had been
mixed with technical  grade tri-  and tetrachlorophenate.6  At  combustion
temperatures  of 500 to 800°C  (932  to 1,472°F),  the formation of PCDD's was
demonstrated.  At  higher temperatures,  the formation of PCDD's  decreased.
When wood  chips and  trichlorophenate were burned, stack emissions of  total
PCDD's were 111,540 ng/g feed.  When tetrachlorophenate was burned with wood
chips,  stack  emissions contained 350,200 ng/g feed.   Addition  of copper salts
                                    3-25
-------
 to  the tetrachlorophenate  formulation and  increasing  the residence  time
 within  the  incinerator reduced  the  emission  of PCDD's.
      In another study, fly ash samples from a fluidized  bed  system burning
 PCP-treated wood,  painted  wood,   and  hypochlorite-treated  paper were
 analyzed.179   Total  PCDD's  and  PCDF's detected in  fly ash samples  after
 burning painted wood  were  177  ng/g and  217 ng/g,  respectively.   When
 PCP-treated wood was burned, PCDD  levels  in the  fly ash  were 324 ng/g and
 PCDF  levels were 241 ng/g.  When the hypochlorite-treated paper was  burned,
 large  amounts  of  chlorine were present  but  PCDD  and  PCDF  levels  were
 relatively  low with  24 ng/g of  PCDD detected and  12 ng/g  PCDF detected.   The
 addition  of pentachlorophenol  to these fuels  did not increase  PCDD  or PCDF
 emissions.
      In a pilot scale  study, two  chlorophenate formulations, Servarex and
 Kymmene KY-5 were  sprayed  over wood wool  and birch  leaves  and combusted in an
          190
 open  fire.      These formulations  are mixtures of 2,4,6 tri•-, 2,3,4,6 tetra-
 and pentachlorophenate as  sodium salts.   PCDD's and PCDF's were detected in
 these  two formulations at  concentrations  of 20 and 150 ppm, respectively.
 When  Servarex  and KY-5 were each burned  separately,  high levels of  PCDD's
 were  formed. When  burned  alone,  the Servarex formed 21,600 ng/g of PCDD and
 the KY-5  formed 11,600 ng/g of PCDD.  Each  of these was  then sprayed over
 birch  leaves  and wood  wool  and combusted in  an.open fire.   One  gram of
 chlorophenate  was  dissolved in  20  ml of water and  sprayed over 30 grams  of
 birch leaves or wood wool.   Smoke gases were trapped in charcoal  filters  and
 analyzed.   When birch  leaves sprayed with  Servarex  were burned,  213,300  ng/g
 feed of PCDD's  were  formed.  When wood wool  and Servarex were burned,  392,000
 ng/g feed of  PCDD's  were  formed.   When birch  leaves  and  KY-5 were burned,
 205,000 ng/g feed  of PCDD's were formed.   Purified chlorophenates were also
 burned with birch leaves.    When 2,4,6 trichlorophenate  and pentachlorophenate
were burned with birch leaves,  levels of PCDD's formed were  1,115,000 ng/g
feed and 957,200 ng/g feed, respectively.
3.2.5  Boilers  Co-Firing Wastes
     Table 3-7  represents  the emissions  data for boilers co-firing wastes.
EPA's Air &  Energy  Engineering  Research Laboratory  (AEERL)  (formerly
                                    3-26
-------



















'CO

CO

CD
Z
cr
i— t
8
CO
cr
LU
1
••
fc
Q
1
1
CO

,^!
i
CO

LU
*§
(-


















to
CD
U
C
£
CD
CD
cr





4-
a
1
CD
r~
C
g
1C
CO
.c
V
<
•a
c

c
_c
4-
H
L
+-
a
<:
c
•a
c
U
V
e
LL
Lu
C







Lu
fl^.


O)
C
cr


i
E







a
Q
c£




CD
O)
C
ia
cr





c
IO
s




c
1
CO
cr
CN



CD
e
ro
cr


C
CD
£



CD
"a.
jg
CO



to
4-1 ^"*
1= -o o
•p +J
4- in 10
o CD y
1- 5
• —i
o »••


•*; +»
o •*-
a> t-
Q. U
>. 10
1- U.

*


O O r-* i— 4 ^-1 t— t ,_( m VO
t * *r *» co co oo m o\


^E
' ^
in c
i •"• ii i ii ii
d"I
m
CD
mS ^E ^ 0,
^S. v. O) -v.
• ?5 I • ? = g> o
*" 1^ Z
o* , o r» o
• r- r» o
•* *-* m m
•a
«» rri
m vo v.
E r» I O)
*x me
1 1 o> IE 0
e i ^ o o i i i
O VO O) ^ O
Z i-I • C i— 1 o
• ^ r*-


•o
^ m m rn
mf, f ~ f ^ I L . f n
C-(_IS z 2 o2Q= c Q
in m • m i-< o z
i~- • m so 1-1 o
!»» P- 0\ (0

m
E
ii I 'I*
••s-
V rH
V
y
m
O)--» V.
c ^H en
IO <— C
O (M 1
Z O CO 1 II II
0 CN

o
V


CD CD CD CD CD CD ^ < CD
Lu. Lu Lu> LL* LL. Lu Lu Lu Lu




•o
C
r^
•-IXJ- r-i m m.-i ^4 m _i
N
•P
y
CO
£

i-t- -^t. *-s.a> -^t. t.
+3|2 -Pi^ U^^3 -PeS 5"^
3O 3*0 E3COIO 3~O r^*O
T3 en -am s ca —" •& -OCQ •— m
c c 5 c +J
t-H M O t-H 3
3-27








CD
"o

CD ><
C r—
O C
O U)
I- CD
>>- 3
O)
§£
*~ o
U) E
in o
T- .C
§ 10
. +J
•^ 0

•p =?
y o

fla i^
•a
Lu -P
a c
eg.
CD <4-


•o •- C
T- O CD
•0 -P (_
CD O CD CO
• +J 5 o>><-
CD ® IO *^
4-> T3 t. -0
•a -p -o m
Q U " §
O CD CD £
^ *o
CO O t- Q

m > o
CN <-> 10 25
y -o

u>
CD
"o.
E
IO
V}

t3
CD
*•
e
4-> "O
IO CD
•o .p
"o y
O CD CD
C +J +J
O CD
in CD -a
c -P
10 CD U)
I'a
= "S8
i z a.

-------
Industrial Environmental  Research Laboratory (IERL))  conducted  studies on
industrial  boilers co-firing  waste  products.41   Four boilers  co-firing
chlorinated wastes such  as  creosote  sludge,  chlorinated solvents,  and waste
oil were tested.  Stack  emissions from three of the  four  boilers were  tested
for PCDD's at a  detection limit  of  1,000  ng/m3  but none were detected.  The
fourth boiler was a steam  generator firing waste wood contaminated with
pentachlorophenol.  Stack emissions of 2378-TCDD from this boiler ranged from
<0.4  to  <1.5 ng/m3.   Total PCDD  stack emissions  ranged from  74.6 to
         3                       3
76.4 ng/m  and averaged 75.5 ng/m .
     A second study for  EPA's  Hazardous Waste  Engineering Laboratory tested
waste fuels and  stack gas emission samples  from five industrial  boiler test
sites co-firing  hazardous waste  fuels.40  Among  the  wastes being fired were
creosote sludge, carbon  tetrachloride, chlorobenzene, methanol,  toluene, and
trichloroethylene.  A watertube boiler co-firing wastes and No. 6 oil was the
only boiler  having detectable  levels of  2378-TCDD in flue gas  emissions.
However, the measured value for the emission of this  isomer was  equal  to the
0.002 ng/m   detection  limit.   This boiler also  had  the highest total  CDF
emissions of 5.5 ng/m  in one  of two samples.   A creosote/wood-fired stoker
had the highest total PCDD stack emissions (75 ng/m3) but the creosote sludge
co-fired with wood waste in this boiler was found to contain 7,400  ng/g of
total PCDD.   PCDD and  PCDF homologues were  not  detected in any  other
chlorinated waste at detection limits ranging from 0.045  to 4.6  ng/g.   Stack
concentrations of  PCDD  from the other four  boilers  ranged from less  than
detectable to 1.1  ng/m  at detection limits ranging from 0.0022 ng/m3 to
0.019 ng/m3.
     In  another  study,   Buser,   Bosshardt,  and   Rappe33  report  the
identification of 600 ng/g  and 300 ng/g of  PCDD's and PCDF's, respectively,
in the  fly ash   of  an  "industrial heating  facility."  This facility  was
generating steam by co-firing  used industrial  oils.   PCDD's and PCDF's were
detected in other  fly  ash samples as well but the samples with  the  highest
concentrations were the only ones reported.
     The EPA .tested six  commercial  boilers  firing spiked waste  oil.81  The
boilers were  in  the size range  of 0.4 to  25  million  Btu/hr  heat  input
                                    3-28
-------
 capacity.   The fuel was  used  automobile oil  spiked with organic  compounds
 such  as  chloroform,  trichlorobenzene,  chlorotoluene,  and  trichloroethylene at
 levels ranging from 1,500 ppm  to 10,000  ppm.
      Of  the six  boilers, only  one  had detectable  levels  of  OCDD  with
 4,500 ng/m  and 17,000 ng/m3 detected in one of three samples  of  stack  gas.
 Detection  limits  were  not specified  for these samples.  Only one  of the  six
 boilers  had  detectable levels  of TCDF with 170 ng/m3 detected  in  stack  gas. *
 Detection  limits  were not specified  for the  other samples with  less  than
 detectable levels.   The  feed samples  of  waste oil  basestock and the  "spiked"
 waste oil  were tested and no  PCDD's  or PCDF's were detected  at  detection
 limits ranging from  0.04  ng/g  to 2.0  ng/g.  Fly  ash  samples collected  from a
 Scotch firetube boiler did  not  have detectable levels  of  TCDD,  but  the
 concentration  of  penta through octa homologues ranged  from  not detectable to
 230 ng/g.  For three fly ash samples  total  PCDD's  were 911  ng/g.  Detection
 limits ranged  from 0.5 to 10 ng/g.  Concentrations of  PCDF  homologues  ranged
 from  not detectable  to 1,000 ng/g. for a  total of 3,777 ng/g in  three samples.
 Detection  limits  ranged from 0.5  to 10 ng/g.
      A 233 MW  utility  boiler was  tested while firing No. 6 oil  and PCB-spiked
 waste oil.     The waste  oil  comprised  10 percent of  the total fuel.   PCDD's
 and PCDF's were not detected  in stack gas emissions  at  detection limits
 ranging from 0.031 to  0.10 ug/m3.
 3.2.6 Hazardous Waste Incinerators
      Table 3-8 presents  the  emissions data for land-based  incinerators  and
 incinerator ships.
      3-2-6.1   Land-Based  Incinerators.   Eleven incinerators firing hazardous
wastes were the focus  of  ten studies.  Among  the types of units tested were
 rotary kilns,   with  and  without afterburners,  a mobile rotary  kiln
 incinerator,  and  a  tar burner.  Wastes  being fired  typically consisted  of
chlorine-containing liquid organic wastes, herbicides, and wastes  containing
 PCB's.
     An  incinerator  was  tested  while  firing  feed containing 3,000  ug/g
PCB's.     Cyclone outlet samples were analyzed  by selective  ion  monitoring
GC-MS.  PCDD's and PCDF's were not detected at detection  limits ranging  from
                                    3-29
-------






















4-

c
2



U)
CD
Q
C
o
CD
cc







u.
8
Q.
















Q
O
Z










Q
I

c
a
cc.






c
10







0)
0)
10
cr





c
s
s



CD
C
ro
OS

i5
£

CD
r""



»O
1
Q

ja
01
c
id (
a in
z r-
•
CM




1 1


I 1

a
c
o
"o u_

o










•• c

CO 
IF- -0 U <-
-a -F- -F- « t
CO 3 «.
C -P 0)^
(T) *" C •-• VO '>-'
o in oo
r*«



i i i


1 O 1
z


C3 CD CD
U. U. U.





^^
O

g



C C C
r™ !•" r™
Lf £• &
(O IO (O
4J 4^ ^J



CO ^ CO
in r» o
r-l r-l





1 1 1






o>

E 0)
^ c —
O> FH |
c m ~~*
in
CA CO
FH CM




1 1 1





"^E 0) M-
•^ *^ C3)
c e '^
I^"» OO •-* •
• m FH
p- in o>




i i i


i I i


jjj ^jj
co in u)
u. < <






*"^
5 FH
O

,
CD <-
G t- C O
i- 0 t. +>
i- -P 3 , CO CD CD C
U C 4-> F- -F-
a ^ i*- v- o
4J O < JQ C
2 5^ i~



CM





1









1







,
O
FH
r-
w


a>
0
in
ro
fO



1
Q
O)
O)
c
o
2

.J
(O
a.











c

JC
2?
10
i


























O)
•&
c
o
o
^
00



^
no



O)
O)
c

o
in
m












_
g
o





without












^

















































"i3
•p
c
F—
O.F-
Q. 0)
3 3
in <*-
3-30
-------
























g
o
1-
£
UJ
HH
fj
~3f
t-H

LU
1—
CO
y

co
8
§ .
< *•»

< ^
i -

•• c
£8
§ ""
LU
1—
O

s
CO
*
00

co

LU
CQ
*£
t-
























Ifl
y
c
0)
L.
ID
• M-
01
CC








•P
a
+j
a
u
a>

1
C
1C
C/5

.C
u;

•a
c
ra

c
C

•p
ia
•^
c
a
c

c
O
•r*
a>
a
•r'
U
IL
8
Q.
•v
1










U-
§






0>
0)
c
a:




c
CD













Q
8
a.








ID
0)
a
ID
Z








Q
p
00
r-
SQ



ID
0)
C
10


i




a>

i
(0
to
(/)
•p "•
T- C
c -o o
3 IB ••-
•P -P
•4- in  a>
C 1 C

tn m
CM --I




fL JC.
0> 0)
*x >^
05 °* _ _ -0— -°~
C ^^ C ^** f^ f^ ^j f^
•Q- . TJ- z Z Z Z

O ~ VO "^
f CM






II 1 1 1 1



is is • ' • §




« «
•p +>
u (. C3 C3 C3 C3
>a ia u. u. u. u.
a. a.





*~* *™*
r-4 O »-l O CM •-)
° 5


Qj,

*i3 to
C -P C C
t_ r— C r— 1— I.
O "^ O "^ *^ O
C ^^ t ^^ ""^ XJ
,= >• _ rr >• >• 2
GO « ^* Q.r*— w w 03
10 -p o. o> re .
y c r-
c o o
O -P
i- m
•P H> 0}
ia 3 3
t- XI O)
•P O
cm ,-
fl) -P O
= 3 i
O in -c
U ID
!_ Q .
•o a >.
0) ^ O •—
•P O) O C
C i- O
> o «
ID "O • O 3
I- « -O O O>
Q.J= O ^ O
0) m +J 4J *o
r- -P ID 0. E
Q. in E 0) O
E a> T: J=
nj -p r—
Ifl CO • U.
m y o o
i»- -^ a o
0 M_ +J 0 1
O >. 1 «3
in ,— IB -p
m ID  a)
^j ^5 *O ^C Q»
t- o> j: ••-
ifl
0)
3
O)
0

i- in o
ID C E
.a O O
c >a a
r— Q
in 3 o >>
"00 r-
r— C
in .2
E C •— C
3 <*- ID C 0)
z o a. o a.
y -0 •
 in
Ifl -P C
S 03 """ Q
1 1» S^
•o o ^»
B N Q
i o a> o
z ja H-
sio -a
3-31
-------
0.03  to  0.06 ug/m.  Because  PCDD's  and PCDF's were  not  detected in the
cyclone samples, analyses of stack samples were not performed.
      One  study  tested two rotary kilns  with  afterburners.234  Three tests
each  were performed at incinerator facilities  at  El  Dorado, Arkansas, and
Deer  Park, Texas.   Test results were reported in terms of total quantities
present in the  analyzed sample because leakage  and loss of unknown quantities
of most samples occurred during shipment preventing the calculation of actual
concentrations.  The facilities  are  operated  by  Energy Systems  Company
(ENSCO) and  Rollins Environmental Services, respectively.  Wastes  during  the
first test  at  each facility  included hydrocarbon wastes,  paint  and  ink
manufacturing wastes,  pesticide process wastes,  and  vinyl  chloride  still
bottoms.  The Rollins facility had total TCDD and TCDF levels of  6.94 ng  and
13.5  ng,  respectively.  The second  test  consisted of  the same wastes as the
first test with the addition of  liquid  PCB wastes.   The Rollins  facility
during the second  test had total  TCDD  and  TCDF  levels of 1.42 ng and 22 ng,
respectively.   The  ENSCO facility during the  second test had total TCDD and
TCDF  levels  of  0.48 ng  and  6  ng,  respectively.   For the third test,  liquid
PCB wastes were fired with  clean  fuel  oils.  The Rollins facility had  less
than  detectable TCDD's at detection limits ranging from 0.48 to 0.9 ng  and  2
ng for TCDF.  The  ENSCO facility had less  than  detectable levels of TCDD  and
TCDF  at detection limits of 0.2 to 0.45 ng for TCDD's  and from 0.08 to 0.5 ng
for TCDF's.
     A rotary  kiln operating at  1,200°C was  tested while  burning Si 1 vex
herbicide.  6  The  2378-TCDD isomer was  not detected at a detection limit of
1 ppb (by volume).  The  penta-CDD,  hepta-CDD,  and OCDD homologues  were
detected at a total of 75 ng/MM5 train.  The penta-CDF homologue was  present
at a  concentration  of 190 ng/MM5 train.
      In an unrelated study, stack emissidns from  a rotary  kiln operating  at
1,200°C were analyzed.    Four  tests were  conducted while PCB's were  being
incinerated.   The average concentration of PCDD's and  PCDF's was 8.6 and 11.2
    2
ng/m  , respectively.  However, TCDD's and OCDD's were the primary  homologues
detected.  Detection limits for the other homologues were not reported.
                                    3-32
-------
      The incinerator exhaust  of the rotary kiln waste  incinerator at Dow
 Chemical was tested.   a  This  incinerator destroys 20 tons/day  of liquid
 waste in the  1,025°C afterburner  and  185 tons/day  of  solid  and liquid
 combustible trash including 1.5  tons/day  of  chlorophenolic wastes from  the
 2,4-dichlorophenol  and 2,4-D processes.   The  average concentrations of PCDD's
 and PCDF's  detected were 7.7 ng/m3 and  29 ng/m3,  respectively.
      At another facility, used  transformer oil  (supposedly containing less
 than 50 ppm PCB's) is fired in  an  incinerator.74   A spot  check on the used
 oil detected one  sample with 90  ppm PCB's.   The  incinerator,  which has
 secondary combustion chambers and  an afterburner,  burns off the  insulation
 from the aluminum  or copper  windings  from dismantled  transformers.   One
.composite ash sample was analyzed  and found to  contain  538 ng/g PCDD's  and
 2,853 ng/g  PCDF's.
      A mobile incinerator was tested while firing  CDD-contaminated  liquid
 still bottoms and soil during one  test and CDD-contaminated lagoon sediment
 (containing 1-21 ppb 2378-TCDD)  during  a second test.108  The only homologue
 detected was OCDD at a total  of 91.3 ng/g in  three  samples.   These detectable
 levels were suspected to be from contaminated solvent used  in  the analyses.
 It was unlikely the OCDD was formed during the incineration  process.
      Dow Chemical  tested an  industrial  solid  waste incinerator (rotary kiln)
 and a tar burner.  2  The tar burner was  a 72 million Btu/hr  unit with  natural
 gas burned  as  a supplemental  fuel.   Four tests were conducted while the unit
 was firing  natural  gas and  tars.  The 2378-TCDD isomer and other TCDD's were
 not detected in  particulate  matter  samples. Detection limits ranged  from 1.3
 to 3.0 ng/g for the  2378-TCDD isomer and  from 0.7  to  1.2 ng/g for other
 TCDD's.   Total concentrations  of the hexa-CDD, hepta-CDD,  and OCDD homologues
 ranged  from 256  to  572 ng/g  for the four tests with an  average of  406 ng/g'.
 The penta-CDD homologue was  not  analyzed  for.
      The rotary  kiln  incinerator Dow Chemical  tested was a 70 million Btu/hr
 unit.   This unit  is capable  of incinerating both  solids  and  liquids.
 Supplemental fuel  is also burned in  this  unit in the rotary kiln and the
 secondary combustion chamber  to  maintain  combustion temperatures.   Three
 tests were  performed while  the  kiln was  burning  tars,  solid waste,  and
                                    3-33
-------
natural gas,  but without  supplemental  fuel  in  the secondary  combustion
chamber.  Particulate  matter from the first  test  was  analyzed for  PCDD's
using a non specific GC-MS  packed  column method and very  high levels of
2378-TCDD were detected.  In the other two tests, a capillary column specific
for 2378-TCDD was used,  so the  results of the first test are not comparable
with the second  and third test. During the first test,  an  average of 5500
ng/g of 2378-TCDD was detected  in  particulate matter.   The average  total
concentration of other TCDD's and the hexa-CDD, hepta-CDD and OCDD homologues
in the first test was  847,400  ng/g.   The total concentration of PCDD's (not
including penta-CDD)  for the other two tests  were  9,710 and 113,600 ng/g.
The 2378-TCDD isomer  was detected in the second test at a  concentration of
110 ng/g.   This  isomer was not  detected  in the third test but the detection
limit was 260 ng/g.
     Five tests were then conducted on this rotary kiln while oil and natural
gas, and  tars and  natural  gas  were  fired as  supplemental  fuel  in  the
secondary combustion-chamber.  The 2378-TCDD  isomer and other TCDD's were not
detected in particulate  matter  from  any  of the five  tests.   Detection  limits
ranged from 2 to 5  ng/g  for  the  2378-TCDD  isomer and from 2 to 8 ng/g for the
other TCDD  isomers.  Total  concentrations of the  hexa-CDD, hepta-CDD, and
OCDD homologues  ranged  from  13 to 1,064 ng/g  with  an average  for the five
tests of 267 ng/g.  The  penta-CDD homologue was not analyzed for.
     Results from three  tested  rotary kilns were reported  in one  study.161
Only one of the kilns had detectable TCDF emissions at a concentration of 0.7
ng/m .  However, TCDF's  were detected in the fuel  which was liquid  organic
waste containing 0.4 to  1 percent chlorine.   The other two  kilns were  firing
liquid organic solvents  with chloride concentrations ranging from 0.2 to 16
percent chlorine.  No TCDD's or TCDF's were detected in the flue gas or feed.
Detection limits were unavailable.
     3.2.6.2   Incinerator Ships.   Two  studies were  conducted with  the
                           1  2
Vulcanus incinerator  ship.  >c   The  first  study was conducted  during  the
incineration of Herbicide Orange  contaminated with  2378-TCDD.1   TCDD levels
in the feed ranged from  less than detectable  to 2,800 ng/ml, with an average
concentration of  1,820  ng/ml injected.   The  detection  limit for the  feed
                                    3-34
-------
samples  was 20  ng/ml  injected.  No  TCDD's  were detected  in the  stack
emissions.  Detection  limits  for the TCDD's were very  variable  due to the
complexity  of the  samples.   Detection  limits  ranged  from  0.0009 ng/ml
injected to 0.086 ng/ml injected into the GC-MS for analysis.
     The second  study  was  conducted during a PCB burn.2  TCDD's,  including
the 2378-TCDD  isomer,  were  not detected in the feed or in stack emissions.
Detection limits  ranged  from 2 to  22 ng/g.   TCDF's were detected in all'
samples of waste and in several samples  of stack gas.   The analytical  method
could not distinguish  the  2378-TCDF isomer from the other 37 TCDF  isomers.
Total concentrations of TCDF's  in  stack gas samples were reported  to  range
from <0.3 to <3 ng/m3.
3.2.7  Lime/Cement Kilns
     Table 3-9 presents emissions data for lime/cement kilns.
     Four studies have addressed PCDD and PCDF emissions from lime  or  cement
kilns co-firing  wastes.20a,20b,58a,184   Jhe  combustion temperature of this
process is about 1500°C with a typical residence time of 1.5 seconds.
     A cement  kiln  at San Juan  Cement was tested while  co-fir-ing liquid
organic wastes containing from  6.5  to 35.5 percent  chlorine  (by weight).184
Flue gas and  particulate  samples were taken.  One  of the four  SASS  train
samples had detectable levels of hexa-CDF and hepta-CDF.  The concentrations
of these two homologues were  1.35  ng/m3  and  0.74  ng/m3, respectively.  None
of the other homologues were detected at detection limits ranging from 1.6 to
4.9 ng/m .   Similarly, one of  the  EPA Method  5  filters  used  for particulate
analysis contained  11.0  ug/m3 of penta-CDF,  25.7 ng/m3 hexa-CDF,  and 8.1
ng/m  hepta-CDF.  None of the other particulate samples had detectable PCDF's
at detection  limits ranging  from  5  to  15 ng/filter.  These  detectable
emissions occurred  when  the  kiln  was fed waste  containing  21.4  percent
chlorine which corresponds to a chlorine input of 3.5  percent of total fuel
input.   This resulted  in a  potentially kiln-damaging condition.   The  study
maintains the detectable emission  occurred  only during "upset"  conditions.
Under other conditions PCDF's were  not emitted, and  PCDD's were  not emitted
under any condition including  the  "upset"  conditions.  Detection  limits
                                    3-35
-------



















z1
jzj
y*
^»

5
Lu
o

£
I-H
_1

• •
^
Q
CD
LU
1-

O

LU
g2
~»
^5
CO


o%
I
PO
LU

ff\
H-


















01
0>
O
c
2
£
ID
•P
C
a
£






Q
8
0.




0)
D)
C
a:




c
(O
ID
3T








0

pi
1
CO

pn
CM


(D
O)
C
IB
ce





c
(D
^



(D
1
CO

tn
t- 1=
c -o o
r> *- in *
O o u
1- 0
o d
z


>*- -p
o ••-

ll
1— Lu

-

(B ^3 1O to
Tf ^ O O GO CO
co eo cvj CM tn tn
i—i •— i




ill I II


e me
^^ ^^
O) O)
c *•» c
o>= co i i i i
o •
CN •rsC +JI_^- 4J C 5^**^
C q> C 03 P C (33 03 J£ 03
§C E 03 C t. 03 C E SUE

T3 ±i
\J T"
u
O 03
C ^J
-------
ranged  from  1.6 to 4.9  ng/m   for stack gas  emissions,  and from 5  to  15
ng/filter for the participate analysis.
     A  wet-process  cement kiln  at General Portland  Cement,  Inc.,  and  a
dry-process  cement  kiln at Lone  Star  Cement  were tested.20a'20b   Both  of
these facilities  were co-firing  hydrocarbon  solvents,  chlorine-containing
wastes, and wastes spiked with Freon 113.  No PCDD's  or  PCDF's  were detected
in stack emissions at the detection limit of  1 ng/ul  injected (into  the GC-MS
for analysis).
     A  lime  kiln at Rockwell  Lime Company  was tested while firing petroleum
coke and waste  fuel  consisting of lacquer thinner  solvents,  alcohols,  and
paint wastes.   a  The wastes  contained approximately 3  percent  chlorine  (by
volume).  PCDD's were not detected in  baghouse dust or EPA  Method  5  filters.
For baghouse dust samples, detection limits ranged  from  0.005 to 0.25 ng/g.
For EPA Method  5 filters, detection  limits   were converted to  stack gas
concentration and ranged from 0.034 to 2.0 ng/m3.
3.2.8  Hospital  Incinerators
     Table 3-10 presents emissions data from hospital incinerators.
     High temperature incineration is  the  preferred method for disposal  of
hospital wastes containing infectious  or hazardous materials.   Most  hospital
-incinerators of older design are incapable   of  destroying  all   hazardous
materials and have  inefficient combustion  leading to emission  of  hazardous
air pollutants.  Hospital wastes  are also  highly variable in content.  They
usually contain 20 percent plastics,  compared to municipal  solid waste which
contains 3  to  7 percent  plastics.  Combustion  of  plastics  composed of
polyvinyl chloride and  other  halogenated polymers and copolymers  can be a
major generator of toxic air emissions.
     A  1983  stack test  on  a  Canadian  hospital incinerator  found PCDD's  and
PCDF's  to  be  emitted  at  average levels  of  69 ng/m3  and 156 ng/m3,
respectively.  a  The test  was  performed on  a high  combustion  efficiency
control!ed-air,  two-chamber incinerator.  Small amounts of  PCDD's  and PCDF's
were detected in the bottom ash,  with much higher levels in the fly ash.
                 C O "i
     Doyle et al_.    reported results from three hospital  incinerators in the
United  States.   Stack test filter samples were analyzed and had  average
                                    3-37
-------


1























en
g
^
^
i
H" «

5!
t—

IS
o


i
C3

s

LU
£j3
1

•
O
i-l

m
LU
H


















tfl
CD
u
c
CD
L.
CD
QL
I






•P
C
a
z





Q
h-

r-
PO
CN



CD
O)
C
IO
a:



c
10
CD

CD
a.
I
tn
•p -~
f C
e -a o
= ^ 5
>+- U) ro
(—8
• ^j
i -

'*- -P
0 •<-
CD T-
CL U
H"LU




fO tO
i-l e mg
O)«^ O>«"^
c 1-4 - c tn

vo in
LO 

o ^




•


























































2
IO
•a
O
U)

i

e
1
s
3-38
-------
 levels of  PCDD's and  PCDF's of  15 ng/m3 and  25 ng/m3,  respectively.
 According to Doyle et al_.,  these levels probably represent less than one-half
 the actual  emissions because more than 50 percent of PCDD's and PCDF's can be
 found in  the vapor  phase  which was  not analyzed  in  these particulate
 screening tests.
 3.2.9  Wire Reclamation Incinerators
      Table 3-11 presents emissions data  from  one study conducted on a wire
                         103
 reclamation incinerator.     Wire insulation incinerated during this process
 often contains PCB's and polyvinyl chloride.  Analyses  of inorganics  in  the
 stack and furnace samples  from  the  three furnaces revealed high  levels  of
 copper and lead  as  well  as 85,500 ppm of chloride  in one of  the  furnace
.samples.
      Total  TCDD and total  TCDF concentrations  in stack fly ash  scrapings  were
 0.41 ng/g and 11.6 ng/g, respectively.   Bottom  ash  samples  from the furnace
 contained 0.058 ng/g total  TCDD's and 0.730 ng/g total TCDF's.   The analyses
 did not distinguish the 2378-TCDD or 2378-TCDF isomers;  only total  TCDD's and
 TCDF's were measured.
 3.2.10  PCB Fires
      Table 3-12  presents  emissions  data  concerning  several  studies.   In
 September 1978, 18 capacitors containing  PCB's  were burned in  a fire  at  a
 transformer station near Stockholm,  Sweden.110  Several  types of samples  were
 taken.  Liquid from inside  an exploded capacitor contained 75,000 ng/g  PCDF.
      In Binghamton,  New York, in 1981, an electrical  transformer  containing
 about 1,100 gallons  of  PCB's  was involved in an  incident described as an
 explosion.     Total  PCDF homologues in soot were initially found to be  as
 high as 2,160,000 ng/g.  The  2378-TCDF isomer accounted for  12,000 ng/g of
 total  PCDF's.  The hexa-CDF  homologue alone  accounted for 965,000  ng/g  of
 total  PCDF's.  Total PCDD's  were found at a  concentration  of  20,000  ng/g
 including 600 ng/g 2378-TCDD.
      In January 1982,  an electrical  fire involving  PCB's broke out in  a
 Boston,  Massachusetts,  office building.60  One bulk soot  sample  contained  a
 total  of 115,000 ng/g  PCDF's  including 60,000 ng/g TCDF.   No  PCDD's  were
 detected  at a detection limit of 100 ng/g.
                                     3-39
-------











CO
1
r~
^2
UJ
•z.

I
^
g
t—

^g?
•C
d
CE>

n 1
oc
I-H
3C
•*
XM
S
1
£
o

"J
Cc
g
CO

•
i— i
r-l
I
m
UJ

PTI
•S
|—






















U)
CD
U
C
CD
CD
a:
.p.
c
CD

C
a
O
s






a
n





CD
OJ
C
a
a:




c
ia
I






O
8
H-

l~-
Kl



8,
c
(O
o:



e
ro
CD
E



CD




CO
U)
•P -^
••- C
e -a o
3 CD i-
•P -P
<*- U) lO
O CD U
h- 0
0 d



^k
<*- -p
r—
0) i-
0. U
>. 10
t— U.




fO PO
o o
•— i i— i




i I


OJ OJ
OJ OJ
c c

vo m
r-
r-4 •
rH O



1 1


(0 (O
OJ OJ
^^ ^^
OJ OJ
c c

r-l 00
•*r in

0 0



I • i






i i



^
*•% ^D
^ U
o x ia
< IO CO C
I^B ^^ ^C !••
CO 3
^- U.

c
L«
CD

UJ <
r-4 CD CO

"O
5

c t-
O 0

5?
e CD

CD i— i-
sll'

















































,







>•
e
o

UJ
10 C
+J 10
ro O
•O U)
0 U.
c o
o
UJ 1-
c
ro "O
g C
"
s a
o
1 O
s ra
3-40
-------

























CO
LU
I— «
i .
LL>
CQ
O
Q.
••
^
S
LxJ
o

LU
f^

3
CO


CM

f»1

LU
i
§
1-





























U)
u
c
£
<2
CD
or



•p
c
CD
•P
C
o
0

CD
i— •
O
*c
CO

.c
VI

•o
 U
00 CO ^ O)
^x C O) CM -^
O) C «S4 O) E • O) O)
O O -^ CO CD O)
oo oo) cc o c
o • o c o
O O * 	 . O O^O ON ^"
r^ ^ i—4 f*^ rH (*** ^^ CM ^
CM



II II II 1 1


O)
^ o "a
O) OO CO
~ O) CO
O J3 c C
1 0 Q I Q |
•«*• Z Z rr CN
« CM
cj> mm
i-H




till II 1 1



O) OO '

O) CO
c c
1 O II II Oi I
o to
vo



TJ Ul Ul
t-+J -PCD -PCD -P -C
= o o a. o a. o ui
O"OO-<- OT- O <
i- to CO X CO X to
_J CD
-p
O -P
» • O n» co
C  _j 10 T-C c
i— "tf ^ (DC Lu EC O £- O
O E O ^ "^ CD E CD CO 4^
jC (Q ^— C ^ ^3 ^ (w ^7 (O ^* O
r-IJi rHj: 1-1 O r-«OCD r--
c CD ui coco n3 t-co « jr
+» i- Z O i-3 COW
co ca m s co (o in
CO S

i. S- !_ U U
O 03 0) Q} Q)
£_ 1 It- Et- E E
O>>U I. O>> (. O>> U £-
4J1-O 0 -Pt. 0 -PS- 0 0
O -P U) I— Ul (— U -P Mr— O -P Ull— UICD
IO-P C 3 C 3 rtl -p C 3 ro +J C 3 C S-
o i-3* t- ^ o i-^o K5* K °


















^

^
c
o

Ul
CD
1

*o
o
.c
Q
0
8

T3
c

Q
O
O
<0
•P
a.
CD






^*
c
O

c
T3 0
CD U)
. -P
o LJ_
95 o
•P 0
CD 1 —

f—^
^j O
O O

-Q U




	



•p U)
a CD
•O r-
a.
O E
C "O
Ul
U)
c t-
(O O
i «.
CD
S |
z.
3-41
-------
     In  March  1982,  a fire  broke  out in a  capacitor battery in a  metal
treatment factory in Skovde, Sweden.192  The capacitors contained mineral oil
and PCB's.   Wipe  tests were taken from  several  locations  and results were
reported in terms of unit  area.  Samples taken  0.5 meters  from the  capacitor
on the floor had  the  highest levels  of  PCDF's with 100 ng/m2  2378-TCDF  and
772 ng/m2 PCDF's.
     In Miami, Florida, during April 1982, a fire and explosion occurred when
an underground transformer vault exploded releasing approximately 100 gallons
of PCB transformer oil onto  the  floor." Smoke ejector fans were set up to
ventilate the vault.   Samples  of soot and other residue from  the fire were
collected.  Wipe samples were  also taken from  surfaces near the fire scene.
Four bulk samples T5f~soot  and other residue, and three hexane wipe  samples
were analyzed.  No PCDD's were detected  in these samples at a  detection limit
of 10 ng/g.  PCDF's from tri-CDF to  hexa-CDF were detected  in  two of the  six
samples.  The  soot and  dust sample taken  from a cable  support bracket
contained 1,710 ng/g  tetra-  through  octa-PCDF homologues.  Soot taken from
the ejector fan contained  670  ng/g tetra- through octa-PCDF homologues.   The
2378-TCDF  isomer  was  not  detected  at detection limits of 10 ng/g  and
100 ng/g.
     In September 1982, molten steel  at  a  steel  mill  in Surahammar, Sweden,
ignited a 500-unit capacitor battery.76  The capacitors were  filled  with  two
tons of  PCB's  and three tons  of mineral oil.   Wipe,  samples from several
locations were analyzed.   Results were reported  in  terms  of unit area.   Two
samples from the capacitor room had  an average of 620  ng/m2  2378-TCDF and  an
average 7,480 ng/m2 of tetra- through octa-PCDF homologues.
     In 1983, in San Francisco,  California,  a  fire  started in a transformer
vault containing three transformers  filled  with PCB's.158  It was  reported
that only one transformer  leaked.  The  liquid remaining contained 127 ng/g
total  TCDD's and 59 ng/g 2378-TCDD.
     A fire  in  Washington State in  1984,  involved  transformer oil  and
      O1 O
cores.      A grab sample of  the  ash  was  analyzed and  found to contain 41.4
ng/g PCDF's and 2.7 ng/g and 2.5 ng/g of the hepta-CDD and OCDD homologues,
respectively.
                                    3-42
-------
3.2.11  Automobile Emissions
     Table 3-13 presents data from automobiles.
     Dow Chemical and the U: S. EPA each conducted a study on emissions  from
            CO O 1 O
automobiles.  '     Dow  Chemical  collected particulate  solids  from  seven
types of mufflers.  Results were reported for three cars burning gasoline and
two trucks  using  diesel  fuel.   Samples were  analyzed  by GC-MS and GC-EC.
Results from the GC-MS analyses are reported here except where noted.
Samples from one car with leaded gasoline and no catalytic  converter  had no
detectable 2378-TCDD and 0.004  ng/g  other  TCDD's.   The detection limit  for
the 2378-TCDD  isomer was 0.002 ng/g.  Hexa-CDD and  hepta-CDD were  not
detected at detection  limits  of 0.014 ng/g and  0.006 ng/g, respectively,
while 0.016 ng/g of the OCDD homologue were present.
     The second car had been burning unleaded gasoline and was equipped  with
a catalytic converter.   The 2378-TCDD,  other TCDD's and  hexa-CDD  were not
detected at detection  limits of 0.003  ng/g,  0.001 ng/g,  and  0.01 ng/g,
respectively.   The hepta-CDD and OCDD homologues were  detected  at  levels of
0.014 ng/g and 0.068 ng/g,  respectively.
     The third car  sampled  was burning unleaded gasoline with  a  catalytic
converter and  had  relatively low mileage  (-15,000  miles).   The 2378-TCDD
isomer was not detected at detection limits of 0.0002  ng/g.   Concentration of
the other TCDD's were  0.0001  ng/g  which equaled the detection  limit.  The
hexa-CDD homologue  was  detected at  0.0005  ng/g by electron capture  gas
chromatography  (GC-EC)  but these  results  were  not confirmed  by GC-MS
analysis.  GC-EC analysis of the particulate  matter samples detected  0.002
ng/g hepta-CDD and 0.008 ng/g OCDD.  These  positive results were confirmed by
GC-MS.
     For samples from one  of the diesel mufflers,  GC-MS analysis  did not
detect 2378-TCDD, other TCDD's or hexa-CDD  at  detection limits  of 0.003 ng/g,
0.007 ng/g, and 0.025 ng/g,  respectively.  Levels of hepta-CDD and OCDD  were
0.110 ng/g  and  0.280 ng/g,  respectively.   The second diesel muffler had
0.003 ng/g 2378-TCDD, 0.02  ng/g TCDD,  0.02  ng/g hexa-CDD, 0.10  ng/g
hepta-CDD,  and 0.26 ng/g OCDD.
                                    3-43
-------

























CO
z
f"l
1—4
CO
CO
»— 1
s
LU
LU
ri
i
CS
H-
^

£
o:
o

LU

^£
U

£^
fV^
S
CO

•
en
r-4
m
LU

ifi
«5J
H






















tn
ID
o
c
o

0)

ffi
a:






•p
1




(D
a
E
IO
CO

_c
If)


T3
C
10
c
o
2
•p
i
u
c
8

c
o

in
U]

1

Lu

>v
O
C

a.






UL

^




§>
c
IO
a:




c
10
E











a
8
a.





Q)
CO
C
10
ce








10
ID
y









Q
^
H-
oo

w
CS



0)
O)
c
cr








i
^r



o

i
IO
CO
in
•p ~*
i- C
C ^3 O
^3 ffi «^
•P -P
>«- in t *
H* '*





CM en CM CO CO CM CM CO
t^ i-H VQ i—4 i— 4 SO \O *^
CM CM CM CM





1 1 1 1 1 1 II







1 1 1 1 1 1 II


0

i
O O)
1 1 1 1 1 1 -V. 1
1 CO
c

cr>

0
(D
U «
CO T3 O "O O CO
C J3 CO CO CO -v. CO C
*— c c c -~. co»— s: <-• -o
TfrH i-HCi-l Lf) CSI Q
O •>- p» OO "*•*-• «^^H CTi^Z
o • o • in o en
• f** * P"* • • •
o "»• o en r* o ' o


en
o
o
1 •
o
1 1 1 1 1 1 01


.
CO
O) CO CO
-»» CO •x. C
O) v. O)
C O) C Lf)
C ^H
^z
CM ^< O O



O) -PCO -P-PCO CO U)
a t-uc t- o i- o c c U4J
**"* ffi 10 °i~ O IO Q) lO "r* *^ ffi (J
IO r— -p 10 i— +J >— JJ 10 IO r— L.
L. t-5- X C. I-1-4J
U U.LUU U.LUU.LUU O LL. X
CO CO CO CO LU





•-Hcni-iOt-Hi-i CMCM





X, x> X, >>. ffi
in in in in co jc
%"O>»'^-4-> "O >» •»" H— O
f-5-O -0 -S'io-§Iio-S>-§'ioSr— i—
CO) ffi IQ 4J IO 4*1 IO ID 10  00

.Q CO

ffi 1
= 6
COC3
o
r- >,
O -a

o -o
-C ffi
§1
0 M-
| C
iQ O
X O
>> ID
r- X -P
C 0
O H- C
O
c in
Sin 10
••- *
m m
§•— LU
10 1

L— ^r fn
T3 ffi









c§

° 10
i- -a -P
O ffi a.
jo in CD
E iO X

c «
ffi o
O i- O
i- 10 o
lO 1
in 10
in c x
ffi O (D
in •<- i
.
a. u L. r-
o c
c in <«- o
•r- (D
i— in o
in o,-»- o
(- E in o
ffi IO >> O
ja in i—
E * T3
3 >4- C C
z o < 10
.a o
o in
•p c
o
•0 -i-
a> -p
E «
«S 3 r-
•P in 3
10 in o
•O «J r-
ie
o • o
c -a
CD L.
UJ -P O
c o >*-
IO 0
0 -P O
E 

3-44
-------
     The U. S.  EPA  analyzed  four composites  of filter extracts from several
automobiles.  Each  of  the extracts was analyzed by  GC-MS  with a detection
limit of 0.04 ng.   Results were  reported  in  terms  of ng per sample with the
weight in grams  of  the sample also noted.  For the  purposes of  this  report
the reported values were  recalculated to  reflect the concentration  of TCDD's
in ng/g.
     A pooled sample from two diesel  cars contained no detectable 2378-TCDD
or other  TCDD's.  Pooled filter  extracts from three  cars  burning leaded
gasoline contained  2.98 ng/g  of  the 2378-TCDD isomer and 47.7 ng/g of four
other unspecified TCDD isomers.   Samples  from  10 cars  with  catalysts  burning
unleaded gasoline  comprised  the  third  sample.  The  2378-TCDD  isomer was
detected at  a  concentration  of  1.4 ng/g.  Nine other TCDD isomers  were
detected at a concentration of 37.4 ng/g.  The fourth  sample was  composed  of
a filter extract from a catalytic car burning unleaded gasoline.  The car was
malfunctioning and  had excessive  oil  consumption.   It was  tested separately
because its extractable particulate emissions were so high its full inclusion
in the catalyst  pool would have  skewed the data.   It was  included in  the
catalyst composite pool at one-tenth  its  normal  emission  rate.   Particulate
extracts from this vehicle contained 0.28 ng/g 2378-TCDD and  7.5 ng/g of 10
other unspecified TCDD isomers.
3.2.12  Activated Carbon Regeneration Furnaces
     Table 3-14 presents two studies which were conducted on activated carbon
regeneration at the Cincinnati Waterworks, Cincinnati, Ohio.13'156  The first
study tested emissions from  the  fluidized bed system before an  afterburner
was installed.     The carbon  regenerated  during the  first  study had been in
service for  approximately one year.   Pre-chlorination of  the  wastewater
(relative to the granular activated carbon bed) was in use.
     Concentrations of 2378-TCDD  in  the flue gas ranged from  0.01  to 0.21
                                      TCDD  concentrations  in the flue gas
ng/m  with an  average  of 0.1 ng/m3
ranged from 0.06 to  0.3  ng/m  with  an average concentration of 0.17 ng/m3.
Flue gas concentrations  of TCDF ranged  from 0.08 to  0.51  ng/m3  with an
average of 0.3 ng/m  .  For particulate  samples,  concentrations  of the  2378-
TCDD  isomer "ranged from  4.3 to 51  ng/g with  an average  of  25  ng/g.
                                    3-45
-------





















g
i
$

QJ
z
9

tie
O

o

£:

I"H
o
*

^.

o
cfl
P
<
S

CC
~j
S>


*
•-i

CO

UJ
Ss
2














•








in
CD
M
CO
fi
cr










4j
1
C


CD
CO
Si
in
TO
C

c
C

4J
re
L.
* ^j
C


• -S

1

a
u.

°E
u.

i
X,
C

£

















u.
o
Ou







g,
C
IO
cr







i
rtj
jF







o
o

lUL







§,
c
(0
CC









e

£

t







0
o
g
K-
1
CO
»
CN






i
to
CC









CD
X



CO
"a.
e
K3
CO

in
c -a o
S CO i-
4J 4->
ID- in co
000
• _J
o ~


^
!*• 4J
O •—
O •*•"
x ia
H- u.



m co 10 
in in co co
xr IE •
O CO CM X. O
o> o> i in o> i
1 X, | X, 1-1 C 1
O) TO O
§C jQ C • IO O\
: O O f- 1-1
• Z • •
"o xr o

m
E co co co
co >•. E £ E
E en on x. x. -x
X. x. c TO TO TO
O) TO C C C
c — - c — -a — . ~
xr xrm IXXT •«»• O»CN
CO'-' CO»-O CO—" ^ CM—»
• C3 • • • •
O -H O ^H 0 0
TO
CO X. i-l
• TO r- xt
O CO C o .
S 1 co 1 1-1
1 ^ 2 ims re
10 e x. x,
o i a TO a TO
• z c z c
0 IO
CO


C0_ O ID
•5 ms "E me m
TO TO . x, x. X, B
C *"•» X, ^^ TO TO*"^ TO X. *"^
xf TO«* c C •» C TOCM
oo *- e — <— c «•»
•-I OO O» CM
• oo m in »H rx
o ^r • • o •
r-l i-l • O



CM CM
• CO •
OB -* TO
x, in x,
1 TO TO | | | |
C 1 C
r-H
O 'CO
CD •*



ms
X. TO
O)  (J 3 3 U 3 U
O C- C9 U. CD Ll. L. 01 U. I- (rt
O. CO Of CD CD
— >— 4-> i-l +> CM
14- 1-
~ "



r-< i-l



U (.
CD CD
« £ T, £
CD O 3 CD 3
£•£•£ 5^t
•o CD -a CD
»- -o 4* ' w- -a 4*
3 m i«_ 3 CD «-
•— CD < r- m <
U. U.








C
o

in
o
>> 3
r— TO
c o
O i—
in 1
o o
3 -C
TO
O U.

E 25
Q
ofe
Q O
cU>.

Ill
§* c
U_ ca
Q U

4-* CO O
a. x a
(D CD O
m—
O -O CD







in
c
o

IO

3
U
ID
u

o


T>
S
3

U)
CD
a.
i
in
u-
0
t.
(D

"i
3
c
in
in

in
CO CD

•o c
•o£
C fl -0
a, a>
w c "*"*
(O <9* $
m 4^
Q) T3
8 14*
'zi
S (0 J3
3-46
-------
Concentrations  of TCDD  ranged from  36 to  66  ng/g  with  an  average
concentration of  48 ng/g.   For TCDF's,  concentrations  ranged  from less  than
detectable  to  245 ng/g  with  an  average concentration  of  103 ng/g  in
participate samples.  The detection limit for TCDF's was 4 ng/g.
     The second study  at  this  facility  took place after installation of an
afterburner.     The afterburner  is  located  in the off-gas stream from the
fluidized bed reactivation unit.  The average  temperature of  the  afterburner
during the  test period was  2500°F.   Post-chlorination of  the wastewater
(relative  to  the  granular   activated  carbon  bed),  rather than
pre-chlorination, was  in  use  during  the second study.  The  carbon  being
regenerated had been in use 200 days.
     Emissions from the stack,  afterburner, and recuperator were tested.  The
2378-TCDD isomer  was not  detected in any  of  the samples.   PCDD levels in
stack samples were  1.58  ng/m , but only the  hepta-CDD  and  OCDD homologues
were present.  PCDF concentrations in stack samples were 0.5 ng/m3.  In  these
samples, the hexa-CDF,  hepta-CDF and OCDF homologues were present.  Detection
limits for  these samples were not specified.  .However,  information was
available for  sample MM5 train  blanks  and  sample train volumes  making
calculation of detection limits possible.  The calculated detection limit  for
the 2378-TCDD and other TCDD isomers was 0.006 ng/m3.  For  the TCDF isomers,
the calculated detection limit was 0.007 ng/m3.
3.2.13  Experimental Studies
     Experimental studies have been conducted on PCDD and PCDF formation from
combustion  of  chlorinated  aromatics  (see Table  3-15).   Chlorobenzenes,
chlorophenols and the  effect  of inorganic chlorine on PCDD emissions have
been studied.  Buser investigated the formation of PCDD's and  PCDF's  from  the
pyrolysis of chlorobenzenes.34  Both PCDD's  and  PCDF's were  detected  in
pyrolyzed samples.  The formation mechanism proposed included a chlorophenol
intermediate.  Buser also investigated the formation of PCDF's from pyrolysis
of  PCB's.35'36'37   The yields  of PCDF's  were estimated to  range from
0.1 percent to several  percent.  The proposed mechanism is  an  intramolecular
cyclization.
                                    3-47
-------



























i

jjr
2
LU
O.
X
LU

••
1

Si
O


o
O£
I


in
CO

LU
ti
H-






-















Ul
CD
£
£
CD
EC











i
•P
c
•«§

o
Q}






Q
g
Lw
i
CO
r-
pr
CN

CD
Cn
ro
01



§
-t-

CD
t1""

to

Ul
i- *C
c -o o
3 CD *-
•P -P
i*- Ul ro
O CD O
1- 5
• -1
O *<^
z

>,

O i-
CD £
0. U
>. 10
t- LU



t •-! moo
(f) r— 1 ^f «^ O
i— 1 i— 1 i-l CM


tn T3
•— 1 ^3* CD
co r** CD
-i l •«- i i
i
i en
* >-.
^ en
Oi 3
CM

Q. -O
E CD
ro (D
Ul M~
cn--^ en
cm ^ ->
«^ cnoo
i-H | 3 ^^ | I
1 s


en
f^. en o T3
en >^ o o CD
3 en CT^ *-t -o i i en
C i-l CD 0 CO -v
CD rH CD CM (O O)
O 1 t- <«- • • 3
f" 1 i-l O
rr> i-i
1 • CM
tn o
•o -o
•O 73 CD CO
Q. CD CD CO CD
€ CD CO ^** ^*
ro M- if-
ui to r^^ ' &* cn^^
^^ ^^ cncs c« ^* *^ ^ 0**
en tn ^^ CM ^^ cn^f cn^*
c •** cn<^ en c — • 3 «
3 3
t~- m p—
C^ ^f ^O *^* C3
•—i CM m 1-1 m



I I ill




i I ill



CD CD CD CD CD
Lu Lu Lu Lu LU






i— 1 iH rH i-H i— 1

^
O

CD i— — > 4.
1C C 0 -0 ^ r-
•^•r-CD OCO UlCOS- O
CI_N»— »-COO CCO ^-^ CC
^J— em 4J J= X CD O i— 3< CDO

J3 Ul (.0*0 S 4J > CDS-CD ro Ul 4-> N Q O Ul
•P^-t-i- -PCO-P -PS® -H--Z «- =
(-3OO o-^r-fo cojaen «-ns o^J
fO CLr- t- r— O J= 0) CngCD rO O 4- r- E
3€-C>t •^COI* CDO> 3O fO
o < u a. Q.M'-»I— ^O'^' c9 — • oo































^
c
o

•n
CO
Ul

£

ro
3
O
rO
U
Ul
CD


Ul
M-
0
U
CO
c
CD
•P
' 0
•a
c
Ul CO
*- c
Ul •*-
CD J3

-351
ro C O
T3 CD

O ra +J
c a. re
•o
ui e
e f LU

o ui o
CD v.
S ft Q
z a.
r 
-------
wood.
      In  a pilot incineration study, Jansson  combusted chlorophenol-treated
           PCDD's were detected at levels rang ing -from 0.2-155 ug/g feed.
   .   Three reports have dealt with PCDD  formation  from  combustion processes
 in the presence of  inorganic  chlorine.145'149'226   Tiernan et al_. found no
 detectable PCDD's or PCDF's emitted  from the combustion of virgin pine.226
 However,  in the  presence of  HC1 ,  significant quantities  of TCDD's were
 detected.   Mahle et  al_.  present similar results when burning coal  in  the
 presence  of C12,  HC1, and NaCl.149  Liberati  et al. studied the combustion  of
 vegetables.      When inorganic chlorine or polyvinyl  chloride (PVC)  is added,
 PCDD's and PCDF's were detected in the emissions.
      Chlorophenol  combustion was studied at  various  combustion temperatures
.and  residence times  by Environment  Canada.200  Combustion  of 2,4,5-TCP,
 Alchem 4135,  Woodbrite 24, and  diptank sludge generated from Woodbrite 24
 preservation,  resulted  in  PCDD concentrations  in  flue gas  ranging from
 0.6-3400  ug/g  feed.
3.3  PCDD FORMATION HYPOTHESES AND FACTORS AFFECTING EMISSIONS .FOR COMBUSTION
     SOURCES
     This section  presents a  summary of the  most common PCDD  formation
hypotheses  for  PCDD  emissions  from combustion  sources.   The  section
summarizes  the  hypotheses contained in the  literature  and also presents a
discussion  of combustion  device operating parameters and  fuel characteristics
that may affect  PCDD emissions.
3-3.1  A Summary of Formation Hypotheses for PCDD  From Combustion
     One of the  earliest  combustion device PCDD formation hypotheses advanced
was that of Dow  Chemical  Company  entitled  "The Trace Chemistries of Fire- -A
Source  of   and  Routes  for  the Entry  of Chlorinated  Dioxins  into  the
             O1 CO
Environment."  '    This  hypothesis was advanced based on sampling  conducted
by Dow Chemical  Company  from  samples taken around the Midland facility and
sampling of a wide range  of combustion devices.
     This hypothesis suggested that PCDD's/PCDF's  in  combustion effluents
were ubiquitous  and were due to the  trace chemistries  of  fire.   This
hypothesis,  in conjunction with the findings of PCDD/PCDF in ashes and  stack
                                    3-49
-------
gases  from municipal"  solid waste  combustors,  lead to  the  inclusion of
combustion  sources  in  the  National  Dioxin Study.
     A significant  amount  of effort has been expended to attempt to explain
how  or  why PCDD's/PCDF's  are  formed in combustion processes.   Table  3-16
summarizes  hypotheses  contained in the literature.  Much of the effort  has
been directed toward  municipal  solid waste  incinerators.   A significant
number of studies and  hypotheses  have tried  to  link specific  precursors  with
PCDD formation.   The most  prevalent precursors cited include  chlorinated
phenols and chlorobenzenes.  A considerable  amount of work has also focused
on the chlorine content of the  fuel.  None of the hypotheses advanced to date
have been proven.
3.3.2  Factors Affecting PCDD  Emissions From Combustion Sources
     This section discusses  the various factors  identified in  the literature
that may effect PCDD emissions.  The  following factors are believed to affect
CDD emissions:
     o    PCDD in feed, '
     o    precursors in feed,
                         i
     o    chlorine  in feed,
     o    combustion temperature,
     o    residence time,
     o    oxygen availability,
     o    feed processing, and
     o    supplemental fuel.
The interaction of  these factors  during the  formation  of PCDD's is not well
defined.  Therefore, each of the factors is discussed separately below.
     3-3.2.1  PCDD  in Feed.  2378-TCDD  is an  impurity  that results from the
manufacture of trichlorophenol, which is  used to make the herbicide 2,4,5-
trichlorophenoxy acetic  acid  (245-T).  Pentachlorophenol  (PCP)  production"
will also result in a  PCDD  contaminant, primarily  octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
(OCDD).  The  primary  end use  for  PCP is  as  a  wood preservative.  It  is
anticipated that  limited PCDD  contamination  will   also  occur  during  the
manufacturing of other similar chlorinated aromatics, particularly  if the
manufacturing process  is  inefficient or not  well  controlled.   Therefore,
                                    3-50
-------




















Ul
'1
1
CL
S
C
5
+•»
rtS
g
o
u.
1

Cu


O

Ss

(19
E
3
to

,
F-l
m


3,2
CO CD






e o
O •C:
•F- -P
ll
U Ul
O i-
u. tn
CO
e -c
P





m







8
o?

c

o ui
S O -P
O -P  'o  O L* **•
i. tn u to 
3 3 C O r— C U -M Q.
 ^_> *•—
O O O O O ^ t. O O "»"


C
•»" f""
0) •»-
(A O
-3 C.
«4- m
0) I
-- £

* O

11

•o 13
o ^
tn

in -a
'CD •£
3

F-'.SU
^F^F?
S5o
LL. 3 J3











ta
^
to



r-














"o
CD in
j= -
o o
o °"
"o S
c
.. o
in N
scursor
loroben
u *••
a. o













Ul
2
S
*
<«-

c
o

U)
5
1






Ul
O
1*
>^ +jt

feo
§?
i i
U Ul
Q- LU
r-
1O

^ co m
.

o











> >t
uj u , a. a.

•si
o3
1
tn
tn
c
(O
ft *
^H *M r^t

tj^ «l
• 0) ^
5.— CD
Q.F- Ul
<0 f 3
cc < m












•
fO]
^J

.
5
u
1
_J



CM




CD
•P
ia

3
ia
c
o

in

mo
o

o o
t- -a
>>
>
•io
-p
u

1
•P 3
in a
O ^:
a. to





u

c
o
4J
Ul
3
A
f
+*
•P »
10
1- O)

B ^

_J£)CD
It- IO
CD
C CX
"u o
o «-

O 2









































!





in
IO
O)
CM
0
IO
>
in
O)


£ £
ia to
u E
u E
•So
in
c
o o
+4 ^
CD ia
c c
u u
0 O
*.
E in
t- in •— o>
H- CO C
in o) c

i- t- a. u in

0°^ 0 i Q.
H- 3 .p a.<4- +J
|| |||§
F^ CD C 4J >
•F- > E ••- ie o
F- 10 It- F- H
T- -a j= o .c

«C O X .T>iO Q.












CD CD
•P -P
ui in
10 10
2 S
•O 13

O O
to to

«3 • ia
_o. a.
5 ""
c 'c
I i





Ul

Ul
• CD B
+jj >, in

• a> 8
u in o
CD 10 O C
E CD in
g Ul -P CD
O CD *!a Z
3-51
-------
PCDD's are expected to  enter  the  environment  as  a contaminant of commercial
products, such as wood preservatives and pesticides.
     The widespread  use of  these products increases  the possibility  of
finding PCDD's in the feed of a combustion process.  For example, PCP-treated
wood may be  used to fire  boilers.   Runoff may carry  pesticides to water
treatment facilities where the organics are incorporated  into  a  sludge.   The
sludge may then  be  incinerated.   Likewise, contaminated waste streams  from
manufacturing processes may  be  incinerated as an  energy recovery procedure.
One example is PCP sludge incinerators used at wood preserving facilities.
     If PCDD's are found in  the  feed of an inefficient or poorly controlled
combustion process,  it  is  very likely  that they will  be  released  to the
atmosphere.
     3.3.2.2   Precursors in  Feed.   Although  the  Dow  "Chemistry  of Fire"
theory is backed by a considerable  amount  of  experimental  data,  many of the
reviewed studies focused  on the formation of  PCDD's and  PCDF's  from
precursors.  Experiments by  Buser,  Rappe,  and others  are described  in  more '
detail in Section 3.2.11.  Esposito et il. presented detailed descriptions of
the formation mechanisms of  chlorinated CDD's from precursors.78  This work
organizes CDD precursors into three classes:
   Class I -  Polyhalogenated phenols, primarily with  a halogen  ortho  to  the
     hydroxyl group, with a high probability of CDD formation.
   Class II  -   Ortho-halophenols  and ortho-halophenyl esters where  the
     substituted groups are a mixture of halogens and nonhalogens.
   Class III -  Other chemicals having the possibility, but  less  likelihood,
     of CDD formation.  These include chlorinated aromatic compounds.
     The majority of experimental work to  date has  centered  on three  classes
of precursors:  chlorinated phenols, chlorinated benzenes, and PCB's.
     PCDD formation  from the combustion  of chlorinated phenols  has been
tested extensively by Rappe190, Jansson111, and Ah!ing6'7.  Dechlorination of
the highly chlorinated homologues can result  in the more  toxic TCDD isomers.
Chlorinated phenols are used as wood preservativesj herbicides, and sap stain
control.  Wood or vegetation sprayed with  chlorophenols may be disposed of by
incineration  or  used as a supplemental fuel  in boilers.   In addition,
                                    3-52
-------
 chlorophenol,  i.e.,  wastes,  have the potential to  be  disposed of in sludge
 incinerators  and  industrial  boilers.
      Buser  investigated  the  formation  of PCDD's and PCDF's  from the  pyrolysis
 of  chlorobenzenes.     The formation mechanism included a chlorophenol and  a
 polychlorinated diphenyl  ester (PCDPE)  intermediate.   Chlorobenzenes are used
 in  solvents,  dyes,  Pharmaceuticals, and  rubber production.   These products
 make  up much  of  the organic  chlorine  found in  feed  of municipal  waste
 incinerators.  The  associated waste product may  also  be disposed of in  an
 incinerator or boiler.
      Buser  also  investigated the formation of PCDF's  from  the pyrolysis of
 PCB's.   '   '    No  experimental  work has been identified on  PCDD formation
 from  PCB's.   However,  studies have  been identified that found PCDD's emitted
 from  PCB fires.60'158   In  addition,  PCB's are  often in  solution  with
 hexachlorobenzeries that  have been shown to  form PCDD's.  Up until  1975,  PCB's
 were  used  as  dielectric  fluids in  transformers and capacitors.   PCB's  have
 also  been used in hydraulic  fluids, plasticizers,  and  dyes.   The incineration
 of  PCB's at waste disposal facilities or in boilers may result  in PCDD  and
 PCDF  emissions.
      3-3.2.3   Chlorine in  Feed.  The chlorine content  of fuel  is obviously  an
 important parameter affecting  the formation of PCDD's  or PCDF's.   Shih et a]_.
 developed a ranked priority  list of conventional  combustion  systems  emitting
 polycyclic  organic  matter including PCDD's  and  PCDF's.211   The rationale
 presented for  source ranking is based  on fuel  characteristics and combustion
 conditions.  Shih's work places great  emphasis  on both the chlorine content
 of the feed and the concentration of aromatics in the  feed.
     Other  authors  have  demonstrated   the  effect  of  chlorine  on PCDD
 emissions.   Mahle et  al_. demonstrated  that  PCDD's were emitted  from coal
 combustion  only when .chlorine was  added.149  Tiernan  et  al_. found  PCDD
 formation during the combustion of pine in the presence of HC1,  but no PCDD's
were detected  during the combustion of pine alone.226  Liberti  s-tudied  the
 combustion of vegetables.145  When inorganic chlorine  or PVC  is  added, PCDD's
 and PCDF's were detected in  the ash.
                                    3-53
-------
      While the precursor theory  has received widespread acceptance,  these
 inorganic chlorine studies  demonstrate that the specific mechanisms involved
 in  PCDD formation are complex and not well  understood.   However,  it can be
 generally stated  that chlorine must  be present for the formation of PCDD,  and
 general  trends indicate that  increased  chlorine  concentrations in the feed
 improve the possibilities of PCDD emissions.
      3.3.2.4  Combustion Conditions.  The remaining factors  identified in  the
 literature that  affect  PCDD  emissions  are combustion  conditions. These
 include combustion  temperature,  residence time,  supplemental   fuel,  fuel
 processing, and oxygen availability.  Combustion efficiency is a function of
 all  of these factors.  In order  to destroy PCDD's or-prevent their formation,
 the  combustion efficiency must be high.   This requires a combination of high
 temperatures,  available oxygen,  high heating value  fuel, and long  residence
 times.
      3.3.2.5  Combustion Temperature.   Experimental  evidence  suggests that
-temperatures of 500-800°C promote PCDD formation, while temperatures greater
 than 800°C destroy PCDD's.6'37'62  Buser et al_. showed that PCB pyrolysis at
 550  to 650°C forms PCDF.     However, pyrolysis  at  temperature greater than
 700°C causes 99 percent destruction of  PCB's and  no PCDF formation.   Ah!ing
 et  a]_.  produced  similar results  for both PCDD's  and PCDF's  during  the
 combustion of chlorophenols.
      Combustion temperature is a function of the  heating value  of the  fuel or
 supplemental  fuel, the  available  air,  and the degree  of fuel  processing.
 Municipal  waste incinerators  are  considered a major  combustion source of
        228
 PCDD's.      The large mass burn  units  are characterized by low combustion
 temperatures.   This is due  in part  to the  high moisture,  low heating  value
 fuel,  poor air/feed mixing  as  a  result of a lack  of feed processing, and lack
 of  supplemental  fuel.  In  comparison, many hazardous waste  incinerators and
 high efficiency boilers are designed for efficient  combustion.  These  units
 burn high heating value fuels or  add high  heating value supplemental  fuels
 and,  even if the air/fuel   ratio  is  low, the air/fuel mixing is  efficient.
 The  fuels are processed to decrease moisture  and improve mixing.   In  many
 cases,  high temperature  afterburners are used  for the combustion of offgases.
                                     3-54
-------
 Several studies have  been  identified that demonstrate the  effects  of high
 combustion temperatures on PCDD's and PCDD precursors.3'184'234  For example,
 no PCDD's were detected  in  the emissions of the Vulcanus  incinerator ship
 during the combustion of PCDD contaminated Herbicide Orange.3  The combustion
 temperature during this study was 1600°C.
      3-3-2.6  Residence Time.  The residence time necessary to destroy PCDD's
 and the  combustion temperature  are  inversely related.   The  higher  the
 combustion temperature,  the  shorter  the required  residence time for PCDD
 destruction.  Likewise,  a low  temperature source  will  require  a long
 residence time for destruction  of PCDD's.  Sachdev et al_.  showed that an
 increase in both temperature  and  residence  time  decreased the formation of
.PCDD's from chlorophenol combustion.200  Similar results have  been  found  at
 hazardous waste incinerators  that run  with  1.5-2.0 second residence  times.
 Combustion sources with longer residence times  and  high temperatures are less
 likely to form products of incomplete combustion,  such as PCDD's.
      3-3-2.7  Oxygen  Availability.  Oxygen availability is a function  of both
 the air/fuel ratio and air/fuel mixing  efficiency,  both of which  are  of
 concern when burning  solid  fuels.  Solid fuels and  high viscosity liquid
 fuels such as waste tars burn as  particulates  or large droplets;  therefore,
 portions of the fuel   are burned in low oxygen  or pyrolysis conditions.   An
 insufficient supply of oxygen or poor  air/fuel  mixing will promote  poor
 combustion conditions  and  PCDD formation.  Jansson  demonstrated that  an
 insufficient air  supply  increases  PCDD .emissions   from   chlorophenol
 combustion.      Municipal waste incinerators are usually fired with  excess
 air.   However,  large  mass burn units  may have poor  air/fuel  mixing due to  the
 lack  of  fuel  processing  or   poorly  designed  air  distribution systems.
 Activated carbon regeneration  and wire reclamation incinerators  are  both
 designed to be operated with  low excess  air.   All  of  these cases have been
 shown  to emit  CDD's.100'102'103
      3-3-2.8  Feed  Processing.  The feed material for  a combustion source  may
 be a  liquid, a solid,  or  a gas.  Both liquid and gas  fuels can  be easily
 mixed  with air resulting  in a high combustion efficiency; solid feeds  usually
 require some processing to improve combustion.   Often solid feeds  require
                                    3-55
-------
drying, shredding,  or separation to  improve combustion.  Similarly,  high
viscosi'ty fuels  (i.e.,  waste tars)  require preparations such  as  preheating
and atomization prior to combustion.
     Feed processing  will  determine  in part  both oxygen availability  and
residence time.   Fine,  homogeneous  feed  particles will  improve air/fuel
mixing and combustion.  Larger particles will  require  longer  residence  times
and may  result in  local  oxygen deficiencies  due to  poor  mixing.   High
moisture  will  also  decrease combustion  efficiency.    Therefore,  highly
processed homogeneous feeds  are  less likely to emit products  of  incomplete
combustion, such as PCDD's.
     3.3.2.9  Supplemental Fuel.  When burning a  low  Btu fuel, the addition
of supplemental  fuel  will  increase the combustion  temperature and improve
combustion.  Haile  et il_.  tested a  boiler  cofiring RDF with  coal.92   The
boiler temperature  was  1200°C,  and no PCDD's  were  detected.   Dow Chemical
tested an industrial incinerator burning waste tars without supplemental fuel
and found ppb  levels  of TCDD's  in the fly  ash.62   After the  addition  of a
supplemental fuel, no TCDD's were detected.
                                    3-56
-------
                APPENDIX A

     LIST OF REFERENCES PERTAINING TO
CHLORINATED DIOXIN AND FURAN AIR EMISSIONS
                    A-l
-------
-------
                LIST OF REFERENCES PERTAINING TO CHLORINATED
                       DIOXIN AND FURAN AIR EMISSIONS

*Denotes draft or unpublished reports from which emissions data were available,

  1. Ackerman, D. G., et a]_.  (TRW, Inc.) At-Sea Incineration of Herbicide
     Orange Onboard the M/T Vulcanus.  EPA-600/2-78-086.  April 1978.

  2. Ackerman, D. G., et al_.  (TRW, Inc.) At-Sea Incineration of PCB
     Containing Wastes Onboard the M/T Vulvanus."  (Prepared for U. S.
     Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water) EPA600-7-83-024
     April 1983.

  3. Ackerman, D. G.  (TRW, Inc.)  Destruction Efficiencies for TCDD During
     At-Sea Incineration of Herbicide Orange.  (Prepared for the Industrial
     Environmental Re-search Laboratory, Office of Research and Development,
     » ^7Fn«Ir^!!?enta1  Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park), Contract
     No. 68-02-2660, March 1979.

  4. Addis, G. and R.Y.  Komai, eds.  Proceedings: 1983 PCB Seminar. EPRI
     EL-3581,  Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, Ca.  June 1984
     520 pp.

  5. Ahlberg,  M. et al .   Chemical and Biological Characterization of Emissions
     from Coal and Oil -Fired Power Plants.  Environmental Health Perspectives.
           -       1983.
  6. Ah! ing, B. and A. Lindskog.  Emission of Chlorinated Organic Substances
     from Combustion:  Chlorinated Dioxins and Related Compounds Impact on the
     Environment.  0. Hutzinger, R.W. Frei, E. Merian, F. Pocchiari (eds)
     Pergamon Press, Ltd.  1982, pp. 215-225.

  7. Ahling, B.,  et al.  Formation of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins and
     Dibenzofurans During Combustion of a 2,4,5-T Formulation.  Chemosphere.
     Volume 6,  1977.  pp. 461-468.

  8. Alsfaerg, T., et al .   Chemical and Biological  Characterization of Organic
     Material from Gasoline Exhaust Particles.  Environmental  Science
     Technology,  Vol 19,  No.  1,  1985.

  9. Arsenault, R. D.  Pentachlorophenol  and Chlorinated Dibenzodioxins in the
     Environment  - A Study of Environmental Fate,  Stability,  and Significance
     When  Used  in Wood Preservation.  Proceedings  of the American Wood
     Preserving Association.   Volume 72,  1976,  pp.  122-148.

 10. (ASME)  Study on State-of-the-Art of  Dioxin  from Combustion Sources
     (Prepared  by Arthur  D.  Little,  Inc.)   1981.

 11. Ballschmiter, K.,  W.  Zoller,  C. Scholz,  and A.  Nottrodt.    Occurrence and
     Absence of Polychlorodibenzofurans and Polychlorodibenzodioxins  in Fly
     Ash from Municipal Incinerators. Chemosphere,  Vol.  12,  No.  4/5,
     pp. 585-594,  1983.                                            '
                                      A-2
-------
 12. Ballschmiter, K., et al.  Occurrence and Absence of Polychlorodibenzo-
     furans and Polychlorodibenzodioxins in Fly Ash from Municipal
     Incinerators.  Paper Presented at the 3rd International Symposium on
     Chlorinated Dioxins and Related Compounds.  Salzburg, Austria,
     October 12-14, 1982.

 13. (Battelle Columbus Division.)  Determination of Dioxin Levels in Carbon
     Reactivation Process Effluent Streams.  EPA Contract No. 68-02-3487.
     January 1984.

 14. Barnes, D. G.  Assessing TCDD Emissions from Municipal Waste Combustors.
     Presented at the 3rd International Symposium on Chlorinated Dioxins and
     Related Compounds.  Salzburg, Austria, October 12-14, 1982.

 15. Barnes, D. G.  Assessing TCDD Emissions from Municipa Waste Combustors.
     Chemosphere Vol. 12, No. 4/5, 1983, pp. 645-655.

 16. Barnes, D. G.  Dioxin Production from Combustion of Biomass and Wastes.
     (Presented at the "Symposium on Energy From Biomass and Wastes VII," by
     The Institute of Gas Technology) Lake Buena Vista, Florida,
     January 24-28, 1983.

 17. Barnes, D.G.  Possible Consequences of Sharing An Environment with
     Dioxins.  Accidental Exposure to Dioxins:  Human Health Aspects.
     F. Coulston and F. Pocchiari (eds).  Academic Press, 1983, pp. 259-266.

 18. Benfenati, E., et al.  Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDD) and
     Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans (PCDF) in Emissions from an Urban
     Incinerator, 2. Correlation Between Concentration of Micropollutants and
     Combustion Conditions.  Chemosphere.  1982.  (Volume No. 12, No 9/10).

 19. Boddington, M. J., Douglas V. M., Duncan C. E., Gilbertson M.,
     Grant D. L., Hallett D., McClelland L., Roberts J. R., Singh J.,
     Whittle, M.  Dioxins in Canada.  Chemosphere. Vol. 12, No. 4/5,
     pp. 477-480, 1983.

 20. Bond, D. H.  At-Sea Incineration of Hazardous Wastes.  Environmental
     Science Technology, Vol. 18, Nov. 5, 1984. pp. 148A-152A.

20a. Branscome, M. et al_.  Evaluation of Waste Combustion in a Wet-Process
     Cement Kiln at General Portland, Inc., Paulding, Ohio.  EPA Contract No.
     68-02-3149.  February 1985.

20b. Branscome, M. et. al.  EvaluatioTi of Waste Combustion in a Dry-Process
     Cement Kiln at Lone Star Industries, Oglesby, Illinois.  EPA Contract No.
     68-02-3149.  December 1984.

 21. Brenner, K. S. et al. Dioxin Analysis in Stack Emissions and in the Wash
     Water Circuit During High-Temperature Incineration of Chlorine-Containing
     Industrial Wastes.  Bull.  Environ. Contamin.  Toxicol.   33:  153-162. 1984.
                                      A-3
-------
22. Bridle, T.R., et al_.  The Formation and Fate of PCDD's and PCDF's During
    Chlorophenol Combustion.  For presentation at the 77th annual meeting of
    the Air Pollution Control Association.  San Francisco, California.
    June 24-29, 1984.

23. Bridle, T. R.  Assessment of Organic Emissions from the Hamilton Sewage
    Sludge Incinerator.  Environment Canada, Environmental Protection
    Service, Wastewater Technology Centre, Ontario.

24. Brocco, D. et al_.  Evaluation of the Organochlorine Compounds in the
    Biological Sludges and in the Products of Transformation. Annali di
    Chimica 74, 1984. pp. 573-578.

25. Brocco, D. et al_.  Inter!aboratory Sampling and Analysis of PCDD's and
    PCDF's in Emissions from Urban Incinerators.  Chemosphere 13 (12)-
    1319-1328, 1984.                                             V
26.
    Brocco, D., et a]_.  Polychlorodibenzodioxins and polychlorodibenzofurans
    in the Environment.  Physico-Chemical Behavior of Atmospheric Pollutants.
    (Proceedings of the Second European Symposium, Varese,  Italy,
    September 29 - October 1, 1981.)  B. Versino and H. Ott, ed. 1981.
    pp. 82-88.

27. Brooks, C., compiler.  Energy from Municipal Waste Research: A Technical
    Review of Thermochemical Systems-Workshop Proceedings.  ANL/CNSV-TM-144,
    Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL.  September 1984.  331 pp.

28. Brooks, G. W.  (Radian Corp.)  Summary of a Literature  Search to Develop
    Information on Sources of Chlorinated Dioxin and Duran  Air Emissions
    Final Report. Prepared for Strategies and Air Standards Division, U. S
    Environmental Protection Agency, October 1983.

29. Bronzetti, G., Bauer, C., Corsi, C., DelCarratore, R.,  Nieri, R.,
    Paolini, M.,  Mutagenicity Study of TCDD and Ashes from Urban Incinerator
     In Vitro" and "In Vivo" Using Yeast D7 Strain.  Chemosphere, Vol.  12,
    No. 4/5, pp 549-553, 1983.

30. (Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc.)  Executive Summary:  Dioxins and
    Waste-to-Energy Plants.  July 1982.

31. Bumb, R. R., et al_.  (Dow Chemical) Trace Chemistries of Fire: A Source
    of Chlorinated Dioxins.  Science.  Volume 210.  October 1980
    pp. 383-391.

Sla.Bumbaco, M. J.  Report on a Stack Sampling Program to Measure the
    Emissions of Selected Trace Organic Compounds, Particulates, Heavy
    Metals, and HC1 From the Royal Jubilee Hospital Incinerator, Victoria,
    B.C.  Pollution Measurement Division, Environmental Protection Programs
    Directorate, Ottawa, Ontario.  April 1983.  '

32. Bureau of Air Toxics, Division of Air Preliminary Report on Sheridan
    Avenue RDF Plant. "Answers".  January 28, 1985.
                                     A-4
-------
33. Buser, H.  R.,  et  al.   Identification  of  Polychlorinated  Dibenzo-p-dioxin
    Isomers  Found  in  Fly Ash.   Chemosphere.  Volume  7,  1978.   pp.  165-172.

34. Buser, H.  R.   Formation  of  Polychlorinated  Dibenzo-p-dioxins  (PCDDs)  and
    Dibenzofurans  (PCDFs)  from  the  Pyrolysis of Chlorobenzenes.   Chemosphere
    Volume 8.   1979.   pp.  415-424.

35. Buser, H.  R.,  et  al.   Identification  of  Polychlorinated  Dibenzofuran
    Isomers  in  Fly Ash and PCB  Pyrolyses.  Chemosphere.  Volume 7,  1978.
    pp. 419-429.

36. Buser, H.  R.,  et  al.   Formation of  Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans  (PCDFs)
    from the Pyrolysis of  PCB's.  Chemosphere.   Volume 7,  1978.   pp.  109-119.

37. Buser, H.  R. and  C. Rappe.  Formation of Polychlorinated  Dibenzofurans
    from the Pyrolysis of  Individual PCB  Isomers.   Chemosphere.   Volume 8,
    1979.  pp.  157-174.

38. Buser, H.R. and C.  Rappe.   Isomer-specific  Separation  of  2378-Substituted
    Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins by High Resolution Gas  Chromatography/
    Mass Spectrometry.  Anal. Chem. 1984, 56, pp. 442-448.

39. Cassitto,  L. and  P. Magnani.  2,3,7,8-TCDD  Monitoring  in  Flue Gases from
    an Incinerating Plant.  .Recent Developments in  Mass Spectrometry  in
    Biochemistry and  Medicine.  (Proceedings  of the 4th International
    Symposium.)  Alberto.Frigerio, ed.  Volume  1, 1978.  pp.  563-568.

40. Castaldini, C.  Dioxin Emission from  Industrial Boilers Burning Hazardous
    Materials.  EPA Contract No. 68-03-3241.  February 1985.

41. Castaldini, C., et al. (Acurex Corporation).  Emissions Testing of
    Industrial  Boilers Cofiring Hazardous Wastes -  Sites A, D, E, 6.'
    (Prepared  for  U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency, IERL, Cincinnati),
    1983.

42. Cavallaro, A., et al.  Sampling, Occurrence, and Evaluation of PCDDs and
    PCDFs from  Incinerated Solid Urban Waste.   Chemosphere.   Volume 9, 1980
    pp. 611-621.

43. Cavallaro, A., et  al.  Summary of Results  of PCDD Analyses from
    Incinerator Effluents.  Chemosphere, Volume 11, No. 9, 1982, pp.  859-868.

44. Chin, C. et al.   Polychlorinated Hydrocarbons from Power  Plants,  Wood
    Burning, and Municipal Incinerators. Chemosphere 12: 607-616, 1983.

45. Choudhry, G.,  et  al.  Mechanisms in the Thermal Formation of Chlorinated
    Compounds  Including Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins.  Proceedings of
    Workshop held  at  Institute Superior de Fanita, Rome, Italy, October 1980.

46. Choudry, G. G. and 0. Hutzinger.  Mechanistic Aspects of The Thermal
    Formation of Halogenated Organic Compounds  Including Polychlorinated
    Dibenzo-p-Dioxins.  Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.  Chapter 6.
                                     A-5
-------
47. Clement, R. E., A. C. Viau,  and F. W. Karasek.  Daily Variations  in
    Composition of Extractable Organic Compounds  in Fly-Ash  from Municipal
    Waste Incinerators.

48. Commoner B., T. Webster, K.  Shapiro, and M. McNamara.  The Origins and
    Methods of Controlling Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxin  and Dibenzofuran
    Emissions from MSW Incinerators.  For Presentation at:   Air Pollution
    Control Association Annual Meeting, Detroit,  Mich.  June 20, 1985
    Center for the Biology of Natural Systems, Queens College.

49. (Concord Scientific Corporation.)  National Incinerator  Testing and
    Evaluation Program (NITEP) Volume 4: Detailed Results. A Report to
    Environment Canada.  June 1985.

50. Cooke, M. et al_.  Candidate  Sampling and Analysis Methods for Twenty-One
    Suspect Carcinogens in Combustion Emissions.  For Presentation at the
    77th Annual Meeting of the Air Pollution Control Association, San
    Francisco, Calif.  June 24-29, 1984.

51. (Cooper Engineers, Inc.)  Air Emissions and Performance  Testing of a Dry
    Scrubber (Quench Reactor), Dry Venturi and Fabric Filter System Operating
    on Flue Gas from Combustion  of Municipal Solid Waste at  Tsushima, Japan.
    West County Agency of Contra Costa County Waste Co. -•Disposal/Enerov
    Recovery Project.  August 1984.

52. Coulston F., and F. Pacchiari, eds.  Accidental Exposure .to Dioxins,
    Human Health Aspects.  Academic Press 1983.

53. Crosby, D. G. and A.  S. Wong.  Photochemical  Generation  of Chlorinated
    Dioxins.  Chemosphere.  Volume 5, 1976.   p. 327.

54. Crummett, W. B., T.J. Nestrick, and L.L. Lamparski.  Advanced/Good
    Analytical Techniques Elaborated on the Detection of Polychlorinated
    Dibenzodioxins in Environmental Samples.

55. Crummett, W. B. (Dow Chemical).  Environmental Chlorinated Dioxins from
    Combustion - The Trace Chemistries of Fire Hypothesis.    From Pergamon
    Series on Environmental Science Volume 5 - Chlorinated Dioxins and
    Related Compounds Impact on the Environment.  1982.  pp. 253-263.

56. Czuczwa,  J.M. and R. A.  Hites.  Environmental Fate of Combustion-
    generated Polychlorinated Dioxins and Furans.   Environmental  Science
    Technology, Vol. 18,  No.  6,   1984.

57. DaRos, B., et al_. (Acurex Corporation)  Measured Multimedia Emissions from
    the Wood Preserving Industry.  (Prepared for U.S.  Environmental
    Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio) Contract No.  68-03-2567,  Task 4028
    March 1981.
                                     A-6
-------
 58. Dawson G. W., J. M. Mauser, M. C. Lilga, Dioxin Transport From
     Contaminated Sites To Exposure Locations: A Methodology for Calculating
     Conversion Factors.  January 1985.  Prepared for EPA.

58a. Day, D. R., L. A. Cox, and R. E. Mournighan.  Evaluation of Hazardous
     Waste Incineration in a Lime Kiln:  Rockwell Lime Company.  EPA-600/
     S2-84-132.  November 1984.

 59. DeRoos, F. L. and A. Bjorseth.   (Battelle-Columbus) TCDD Analysis of Fly
     Ash Sample.  (Prepared for U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency, Research
     Triangle Park, NC)  EPA Contract No. 68-02-2686, Task 113. June 15, 1979.

 60. des Rosiers, P. E.  PCBs, PCDFs, and PCDDs Resulting from Transformer/
     Capacitor Fires: An Overview. From: Proceedings: 1983 PCB Seminar.
     Research Project 2028, Electric  Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, Ca.,
     June 1984.

 61. des Rosiers, P. E.  Remedial Measures for Wastes Containing
     Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and Dibenzofurans (PCDFs):
     Destruction, Containment, or Process Modification.  British Occupational
     Hygiene Society, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp 57-72, 1983.

 62. (Dow Chemical) The Trace Chemistries of Fire - A Source of and Routes for
     the Entry of Chlorinated Dioxins into the Environment.  The Chlorinated
     Dioxin Task Force, the Michigan Division of Dow Chemical U.S.A. 1978.

62a. Doyle, B. W., D. A. Drum, and J. D. Lauber.  The Smoldering Question of
     Hospital Wastes.  Pollution Engineering.  17(7), July 1985.  pp. 35-39.
 63. Dioxins.
     Nov. 80.
Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH.
EPA 600/2-80-197.
'64. Dryden, F. E., et al_.  (Walk, Hayde, & Associates).  Dioxins: Volume III
     - Assessment of Dioxin-Forming Chemical Processes.  (Prepared for the
     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  Cincinnati, Ohio).
     EPA-600/2-80-158.  June 1980.

 65. Duckett, E. J.  Dioxins in Perspective:  Knowns, Unknowns, Resolving the
     Issues.  Solid Wastes Management.  May 1981.  pp. 56-57, 88-89.

 66. Dykes, R. M.  (Radian Corp.)  A Review of Standards of Performance for
     New Stationary Sources - Sewage Sludge Incinerators. (Prepared for
     Environmental Protection Agency, Emissions Standards and Engineering
     Division)  EPA Contract No. 68-02-3816, January 1984.

 67. Eiceman, 6. A. and H. 0. Rghei.  Chlorination reactions of 1,2,3,4-Tetra-
     chlorodibenzo-p-dioxin on fly ash with HC1 in air.  Chemosphere, Vol. II,
     No. 9, pp. 833-839, 1982.   -
                                      A-7
-------
68. Eiceman, G. A.  and  H. 0.  Rghei.   Presence  of  Nitro-chlorinated  Dioxins  on
    Fly Ash from Municipal  Incinerators  and  From  Laboratory  Production
    Through Reactions Between NO,,  and T.CDD  on Fly  Ash.   Chemosphere,
    Vol. 13, No. 9, pp.  1025-1032,  19847

69. Eiceman, G. A., et  a]..  Variations in  Concentrations  of  Organic Compounds
    Including Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins and Polynuclear Aromatic
    Hydrocarbons in Fly Ash from a Municipal  Incinerator.  Analytical
    Chemistry.  Volume  53,  1981.   pp. 955-959.

70. Eiceman, G. A., et  al_.  Ultrasonic Extraction of Polychlorinated
    Dibenzo-p-dioxins and Other Organic  Compounds from Fly Ash  from Municipal
    Incinerators.  Analytical  Chemistry.   Volume  52,  1980.   pp.  1492-1496.

71. Eiceman, G. A., et  a]..  Analysis  of  Fly  Ash from Municipal  Incinerators
    for Trace Organic Compounds.   Analytical Chemistry.   Volume 51,  1979.
    pp. 2343-2350.

72. Eklund G., and B. Stromberg.   Detection  of Polychlorinated  Polynuclear
    Aromatics in Flue Gases from Coal Combustion  and Refuse  Incinerators
    Chemosphere, Vol. 12, No.  4/5,  pp. 657-660, 1983.
73.
(Environment Canada), Report of the Ministers' Expert Advisory Committee
on Dioxins, November 1983.
74. EPA Letter from Anita J. Frankel, to Bob Courson, Dana Davoli,  RE:
    Dioxin and Furans in Ross Electric at Logan Hill  Incinerator Ash
    Jan. 15, 1985.

75. EPA Memorandum from: J. P. O'Connor to Dr. Robert M. Clark   RE- Risk
    Assessment on Preliminary Dioxin Data for Cincinnati Carbon Regeneration
    Plant.  May 10, 1985.

76. EPRI CS 3308.  State-of-the-Art Review: PCDDs and PCDFs in Utility PCB
    Fluid.  November 1983.

77. Erickson, M. D. et a]_.  Thermal Degradation Products from Dielectric
    Fluids.  EPA-560/5-84-009, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
    Washington, D.C.  December 1984.  91 pp.

78. Esposito, M. P., et al_. (PedCo Environmental).  Dioxins: Volume I -
    Sources, Exposure, Transport, and Control.  (Prepared for the U.S.
    Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio).  EPA-600/2-80-156
    June 1980.

79. Esposito, M. P. and D. R.  Watkins.  Airborne Dioxins:  The Problem in
    Review.  Paper Presented at the 73rd Annual Meeting of the Air Pollution
    Control Association.  Montreal, Quebec.  June 22-27, 1980.
                                     A-8
-------
80. Feeney, A. and J. Jubak.  Dow and Dirty.  Environ. Action, Volume 14,
    November 9, 1983.

81. Fennelly, P. F., et al_.  Environmental Characterization of Disposal of
 *  Waste Oils in Small Combustors.  (Draft) U.S. Environmental Protection
    Agency, Contract No. 68-02-3168.  August 1983.

82. Fishbein, L. Trace Organic Contaminants in the Environmental Chlorinated
    Dioxins and Dibenzofurans.  International Journal of Ecology and
    Environmental Sciences.  Volume 2, 1976.  pp. 69-81.

83. (Fred C. Hart, Associates).  Assessment of Potential Public Health
    Impacts Associated with Predicted Emission of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-
    Dioxins and Polychlorinated Dibenzo-Furans from the Brooklyn Navy Yard
    Resource Recovery Facility. Prepared for New York City Department of
    Sanitation.  August 17, 1984.  387 pp.

84. (Fred C. Hart, Associates).  Conclusions of New York's Study on Dioxins
    and MSW Incineration.  Waste Age V. 15, No. 11, 1984.

85. (Fred C. Hart, Associates).  Impact of Burning Hazardous Waste in
    Boilers.  Prepared for SCA Chemical Services, Inc.,  August 1982.

86. Frounfelker, R.  (Systech), A Technical, Environmental, and Economic
    Evaluation of Small Modular Incinerator Systems with Heat Recovery,
    (Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste
    and the California State Waste Management Board), 1979.

87. Gizzi, F., et al_.  Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDD) and
    Polychlorinated  Dibenzofurans (PCDF) in Emissions from an Urban
    Incinerator - 1.  Average and Peak Values.  Chemosphere.  Volume 11,
    1982,  pp. 577-583.

88. Gorman, P. G., G. J. Hennon and G. S. Kush.  Summary of Trial Burn
    Results at the SCA Incinerator.  For Presentation at the 77th Annual
    Meeting of the Air Pollution Control Association.  San Francisco, Ca.
    June 24-29, 1984.

89. Graham, S. J. et a]_.  Production of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxins
    (PCDD) and Dibenzofurans (PCDF) from Resource Recovery Facilities -
    Part I.  Sources, Emissions and Air Quality Standards.  Presented at the
    1984 National Waste Processing Conference - Engineering:  The Solution,
    Orlando, Fla., June 3-6, 1984.  pp. 345-376.

90. Gross, M. L. et al_.  Analysis of Tetrachlorodibenzodioxins and
    Tetrachlorodibenzofurans in Fly Ash and Bottom Ash.  Department of
    Chemistry, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, N.E.

91. Gschwandtner, G. et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Dispersion Models for
    Point.and Area Sources, JAPCA, Volume 32, No. 10, October 1982.
                                     A-9
-------
 92. Haile, C. et al  (MRI).  Assessment of  Emissions of Specific Compounds
     from a Resource  Recovery Municipal Refuse  Incinerator.   1984    EPA
     560/5-84-002.

 93. Haile, C. L., et al-   (MRI)  Comprehensive Assessment of the Specific
     Compounds Present in Combustion Processes.  Volume 3, National  Survey of
     Organic Emissions from Coal Fired Utility Boiler Plants, Vol   1
     EPA-560/5-83-006, September 1983.                           '

 94. Haile, C.L., et al..  Emissions of Organic Pollutants from Coal-Fired
     Utility Boiler Plants:  Identification and Analysis of Organic  Pollutants
     in Air.  L.H. Keith (ed).  Butterwork  Publishers, 1984,  pp. 443-458.

 95. Hall, J. et al (GCA Corp.).  Evaluation of PCB Destruction Efficiency in
     an Industrial Boiler.  (Prepared for IERL, U.S. Environmental  Protection
     Agency) April 1981.

 96. Hall, J. M., et al (GCA Corp.).  Evaluation of the PCB Thermal  Disposal
  *  Process in Unit 3 Boiler at Northeast Utilities' Middletown Station
     Draft Final Report, (Prepared for Northeast Utilities, Hartford,
     Connecticut).  GCA-TR-81-82-G.

 97. Harless, R. L. and R. G. Lewis.  Quantitative Determination of
     2,3,7,8-TCDD Residues by GC/MS.  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
     Health Effects Research Laboratory, .Research Triangle Park, NC, 1982.

 98. Harless, R. L.  High Resolution Mass Spectrometry Methods of Analysis for
     Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins and Dibenzofurans.  Human  and Environmental
     Risks of Chlorinated Dioxins and Related Compounds. Plenum Publishing,
     1983.

 99. Health Hazard Evaluation Report.  HETA 82-224-1336.  NIOSH Investigators:
     Stanley Salisbury I.H. Miami Fire Dept.  Miami, Fla., July 1983.

100. Higgins, G. H. (Systech Corporation) An Evaluation of Trace Organic
     Emissions from Refuse Thermal Processing Facilities.  (Prepared for U S
     Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.) Contract No.
     68-01-6071.  July 1982.

101. Howes, J. E., Jr. et al.  Characterization of Stack Emissions from
     Municipal Refuse-to-Energy Systems.  EPA Contract No. 68-02-3458.
                                                                       «
102. Howes, J. E., et al.   Determination of Dioxin Levels in Carbon
     Reactivation Process  Effluent Streams.   U.S. Environmental  Protection
     Agency, Contract No.  68-02-3487.

103. Hryhorczuk,  D.  0.,  et al.   A Wire Reclamation Incinerator as a Source of
     Environmental Contamination with Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins and
     Tetrachlorodibenzofurans.   Archives of Environmental  Health.   Volume 36
     1981.   pp.  228-234.
                                      A-10
-------
104. Hulman, P.B., et al_.   (Radian Corp.)  Screening Study on Feasibility of
     Standards of Performance for Wood Charcoal Manufacturing,  (Prepared for
     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Emissions Standards  and Engineering
     Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards), August 1978.

105. Hunter, S. C. et a]..  Application of Combustion Modifications to
     Industrial Combustion Equipment.  EPA-600/7-79-015a, U.S.  Environmental
     Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. January 1979.  550 pp.

106. Hutzinger, 0. (Editor) Chlorinated Dioxin and Related Compounds Impact on
     the Environment.  Pergamon Series on Environmental Science, Vol. 5, 1982.

107. Hutzinger, 0.  Urban Incinerators: Causes of Dioxins in the Environment.
     Presented at the Congress of La Risposta Techno!ogica Agli Inquinamenti
     Chimici, Milan, Italy, September 20-22, 1984.  10 pp.

108. (IT Corporation.)  Dioxin Trial Burn Data Package EPA Mobile Incineration
     System at the James Denney Farm Site McDowell, Missouri.   EPA Contract
     68-03-3069.  June 21, 1985.

108a.Jacobs, L., M. Zabik, and J. Philips.  Concentrations of Selected
     Hazardous Chemicals in Michigan Sewage Sludges and Their Impact on Land
  •   Application.  Final Report.  Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
     1981.

109. Janssens, J. et al_.  Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Emissions
     of a Municipal Incineration Installation.  Presented at CEC
     Physico-Chemical Behaviour of Atmospheric Pollutants, 2nd  Symposium,
     Italy, September 1981.

110. Jansson, B. and 6. Sundstrom.  Formation of Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans
     (PCDFs) During a Fire Accident in Capacitors Containing Polychlorinated
     Biphenyls (PCB).  From Pergamon Series on Environmental Science Volume 5
     - Chlorinated Dioxins and Related Compounds Impact on the  Environment.
     1982.   pp. 201-208.

111. Jansson, B., e£ al_.  Formation of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins
     During Combustion of Chlorophenol Formulations.  The Science of the Total
     Environment.  Volume 10, 1978, pp. 209-217.

112. Jellum, E., A.K. Thorsrud, and F. W. Karasek.  Two Dimensional
     Electrophoresis for Determining Toxicity of Environmenta'l  Substances.
     Analytical Chemistry, 1983, Volume 55, pp. 2340-2344.

113. (JRB Associates).  Solid Waste Data:  A Compilation of Statistics on
     Solid Waste Management Within the United States.  EPA Contract
     No. 68-01-6000, August 1981.

114. Josephson, J. Chlorinated Dioxins and Furans in the Environment.
     Environment Science Technology 17(3): 124A-129A.  1983.
                                      A-ll
-------
115. Junk, J. A. and J. J. Richard.  Dioxins Not in Effluents from Coal/Refuse
     Combustion.  Chemosphere, Volume 10, 1981.  pp. 1237-1241.

116. Karasek, F. W., et al.  Distribution of PGDDs and Other Toxic Compounds
     Generated on Fly Ash Particulates in Municipal Incinerators.  Journal of
     Chromatography.  Volume 239, 1982, pp. 173-180.

117. Karasek, F. W.  Dioxins from Garbage:  Previously Unknown Source of Toxic
     Compounds is Being Uncovered Using Advanced Analytical Instrumentation.
     Canadian Research. September 1980.' pp. 50-56.

118. Karasek, F. W. et a]_.  Gas Chromatographic-Mass Spectrometric Study on
     the Formation of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxins and Polychlorobenzenes
     from Polyvinyl Chloride in a Municipal Incinerator.  J. of ChromatoqraDhv
     270: 227-234.  1983.

119. Kayser, R., et al.  2,3,7,8-TCDD - Intermedia Priority Pollutant Guidance
     Documents.  Prepared by the Office of Toxics Integration and the Office
     of Pesticides and Toxic Substances. U.S. Environmental Protection Aqency
     July 1982.                                                         3   J

120. Kearney, D. C., el al.  Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in the Environment:
     Sources, Fate, and Decontamination.  Environmental Health Perspectives
     Volume 5, 1973.  pp. 273-277.

121. Keitz, E. et al.  (Mitre Corporation)  Hazardous Waste Incineration:  A
     Profile of Existing Facilities, EPA Contract No.  68-03-3021, July 1982.

122. Kemp, Clinton C.,  Needed: Plain Talk About Dioxin.  Waste Age.  May 1985
     v.15, No. 5 pp. 142-152.

123. Kim, N.  Building Reclamation After Dioxin Contamination by PCB Fires-
     Accidental Exposure to Dioxins:  Human Health Aspects.  F.  Coulston and
     F. Pocchiari (eds).  Academic Press,  1983, pp. 185-186.

124. Kimble, B. J.  Comments on "Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins and Related
     Compounds in Incinerator Effluents."   Chemosphere.  Volume 10,  1981
     pp. 243-244.

125. Kimble, B. J. and M. L.  Gross.   Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin Quantitation
     in Stack-Collected Coal  Fly Ash.  Science.  Volume 207.  January 1980
     pp. 59-61.

126. Kimbrough, R. D. ed.  Halogenated Biphenyls, Terphenyls,  Naphthalenes,
     Dibenzodioxins, and Related Products.  Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical
     Press, Amsterdam.  1980.  406 pp.

127. Kooke, R., et al-  Extraction Efficiencies of Polychlorinated
     Dibenzo-p-dioxins and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans from Fly Ash.
     Analytical  Chemistry.  Volume 53,  1981.  pp. 461-463.
                                      A-12f
-------
128. Kriebel, D. Dioxins: Toxic and Still Troublesome.  Environment.
     Volume 23, Number 1. January/February 1981.  pp. 6-13.

129. Krishnan E. R., and G. V. Hellwig.  Trace Emissions from Coal and Oil
     Combustion.  Environmental Progress (Vol. 1, No. 4)  November 1982.
     pp. 290-296.

130. Kulkarni, S.   (TRW Inc.)  Pollution Aspects of the Thermal Regeneration
     of Spent Activated Carbon.  U. S. Environmental Protection Agency,
     Research Triangle Park, N.C., February 1984. 39 pp.

131. Lahaniatis, E. S., et al_.  On the Occurrence of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons
     in Fly Ash from Waste Combustion Facilities.  Chemosphere.  Volume 6,
     1977.  pp. 11-16.

132. Lamberton, J., et al_.  The Determination of Polychlorodibenzo-p-dioxins
     in Pentachlorophenol Wood Treatment Solutions.  Journal of the American
     Industrial Hygiene Association.  Volume 40, 1979.  pp. 816-822.

133. Lamparski, L.  L. et al_.  Photolysis of Pentachlorophenol-Treated Wood.
     Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxin Formation.  Environmental Science and
     Technology.  Volume 14, No. 2.  February 1980.  pp. 196-200.

134. Lamparski, L.  L. and T. J. Nestrick.  Determination of Tetra-, Hexa-,
     Hepta-, and Octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin Isomers and Particulate Samples at
     Parts Per Trillion Levels.  Analytical Chemistry.  Volume 52, 1980.
     pp. 2045-2059.

135. Lao, R. C. et  a]..  Investigation of PAH and Polychlorinated Organic
     Pollutant Emissions from Wood Combustion Sources.  From: Polynuclear
     Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Formation, Metabolism and Measurement, 7th
     International  Symposium.  Columbus, Ohio, Oct. 26-28, 1982

136. Lee, K. W. et  a]_  (Radian Corporation) J. M. Huber PCB Destruction
     Process Trial  Burn Report.  (Prepared for J. M. Huber Corp. Borger,
     Texas,) October 1983.

137. Leinster, C.  The Sweet Smell of Profits from Trash.  Fortune, Vol. Ill
     No. 7, April 1, 1985.

138. Levin, J. 0. and C. A. Nilsson.  Chromatographic Determination of
     Polychlorinated Phenols, Phenoxyphenols, Dibenzofurans, and
     Dibenzodioxins in Wood Dust from Worker Environments.  Chemosphere.
     Volume 6, 1977.  pp. 443-498.

139. Levin, J. 0.,  et al_.  Use of Chlorophenols and Fungicides in Sawmills.
     Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health.  Volume 2, 1976.
     pp. 71-81.
                                      A-13
-------
140. Liberti, A., and D. Brocco.  Formation of Polychlorodibenzo-Dioxins and
     Polychlorodibenzofurans in Urban Incinerators Emissions. In:
     Chlorinated Dioxins & Related Compounds Impact on the Environment.
     0. Hutzinger, R. W. Frei, E. Merian,  F. Pocchiari (eds.) Pergamon
     Press 1982, pp. 245-251.

141. Liberti, A., G. Goretti, and M. V. Russo.  Formation of Polychlorodi-
     benzodioxins and Polychlorodibenzofurans in Urban Wastes Incineration
     Gazzetta Chimica Italiana, 113 No. 9-10, 1983.

142. Liberti, A., et al.  Determination of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins
     and Dibenzofurans in the Emissions from Urban Incinerators.  Mikrochimica
     Acta.  Volume I, 1981.  pp. 271-280.

143. Liberti, A., et al.  Evaluation of Organochlorine Compounds in the
     Emissions of Urban Incinerators.  From the Pergamon Series on
     Environmental Science Volume 3 - Analytical Techniques in Environmental
     Chemistry.  1980.  pp. 157-166.

144. Liberti, A. and D. Brocco.  Formation of Polychlorodibenzo-dioxins and
     Polychlorodibenzofurans in Urban Incinerators Emissions:  Chlorinated
     Dioxins and Related Compounds Impact on the Environment.  0. Hutzinger,
     R.W. Frei, E. Merian, F. Pocchiari (eds).  Pergamon Press, 1982,
     pp. 245-251.

145. Liberti, A., et al.  PCDD and PCDF Formation in the Combustion of
     Vegetable Wastes.  Chemosphere, Volume 12, No. 4/5, 1983, pp. 661-663.

146. Lindahl, R. et al  Formation of Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans (PCDFs) and
     Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) from the Pyrolysis of
     Polychlorinated Diphenyl Esters.  Chemosphere, Vol. 9, pp. 351-361, 1980.

147. Liptak, B.G.  Environmental Engineers Handbook.  Volume 3, Chilton Book
     Company, Ontario, Canada, 1974, p. 283.

148. Lustenhouwer, J., et al.  Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins and Related
     Compounds in Incinerator Effluents:   A Review of Measurements and
     Mechanisms of Formation.  Chemosphere.  Volume 9, 1980.  pp.  501-522.

149. Mahle,  N. and L. Whiting (Dow Chemical).   The Formation of
     Chlorodibenzo-p-dioxins by Air Oxidation and Chlorination of Bituminous
     Coal.  Chemosphere.   Volume 9,  1980.   pp.  693-699.
150.
151
Main, J.  Dow vs. The Dioxin Monster.  Fortune, Vol. 107 (11). May 30,
1983.                                 -

Makasani, J.  Don't Let the Dioxin Issue Axe New Refuse-Fired Power
Plants.  Power, .August 1984, pp. 87-89.
152.  Mamantov,  A.   Linear Correlation Between Photolysis and Toxicity of
     Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins.   Environmental  Science Technology,
     1984,  18,  pp.  808-810.                                            ^
                                      A-14
-------
153. Mantell, C.L.  Carbon and Graphite Handbook.  Interscience Publishers,
     New York, 1968.

153a. Memo from Amendola, 6. A., Project Manager,  Michigan Dioxin Studies,
  *   Region V to D. G. Barnes, Chairman Coordinator, Dioxins Work Group.
      Michigan Dioxin Studies—Ambient Air/Dow Chemical Emissions Data.
      September 5, 1985.
154.
155.
156.
  *
157.
158.
  *
159.
160.
161.
  *
162.


163.




164.
Memo from Cook, M.B., Dioxin Management Coordinator, U.S.  Environmental
Protection Agency, to Schatzow, S.  and List of Addressees.
February 13,  1984.

Memo from Poppiti, J., Manager  -Delisting Program, U.S.Environmental
Protection Agency, to Chlorinated Dioxins Workgroup and  List of
Addressees.   May 23, 1985.  25  pp.  RCRA Dioxin Delisting Petition
for the Mobile  Incinerator System.

Miller, S. E. e_t a]_.  Determination of Dioxin and Furan  Levels in
Effluent Streams of the Cincinnati  Waterworks Carbon Reactivation
System.  EPA  Contract No. 68-01-6702.  July 1985.

Mix, T. W. and  B. L. Murphy.  Risks Associated with Waste-Fuel Use  in
Cement Kilns.   Environmental Progress Vol. 3, No. 1, 1984.  pp. 64-70.

Moore, J. A.  Assistant Administrator for Pesticides and Toxic
Substances.   (Memorandum)  Advance  Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on
PCB Electrical  Transformer Fires.

Morselli, L., et a]_.  Analysis  of the Effluents of an Urban-Solid Refuse
Incinerator:  Study of Methods  of Extraction and Analysis  for the
Quantitative  Determination of Polychlorodibenzo-p-dioxins.  Annals  of
the Italian Chemical Society -  1981.  Volume 71, Nos. 9-10.  pp. 557-572'.

(MRI).  Assessment of Emission  of Specific Compounds from  a Resource
Recovery Municipal Refuse Incinerator.  EPA Contract No. 68-01-5915.
May 22, 1985.   EPA 560/5-84-002.

(MRI).  Performance Evaluation  of Full Scale Hazardous Waste
Incinerators.   Draft Final Report.  (Prepared for U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Incineration Research Division) January 1984.

(MRI Report).   PDCF Formation from  PCB's Under Fire Conditions EPA
Contract No.68-02-3938.  Sept.  20,  1984.

National Research Council o'f Canada.  Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxins:
Criteria for Their Effects on Man and His Environment.   NRCC No. 18574.
1981.  251 pp.

National Research Council of Canada.  Polychlorinate Dibenzofurans:
Criteria for Their Effects on Humans and the Environment.  NRCC No.
22846.  1984. 243 pp.
                                      A-15
-------
 167,
165. Nestrick, T. J. and. L. L. Lamparski.  Isomer-Specific Determination of
     Chlorinated Dioxins for Assessment  of Formation and Potential
     95o9r^Sant?Lomission from Wood Combustion.  Analytical Chemistry. 54:
     ttyZ-2299. 1982.

166. Nestrick, T. J., et al_.  (Dow Chemical)  Comments on Variations in
     Concentrations of Organic Compounds Including Polychlorinated
     Dibenzo-p-dioxins and Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Fly Ash from a
     Municipal Incinerator.  Analytical Chemistry.  Volume 54, 1982.
     pp. 823-824.

     Nestrick, T. J., et al.  (Dow Chemical)  Methodology and Preliminary
     Results for the Isomer-Specific Determination of TCDDs and Higher
     Chlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins in Chimney Particulates from Wood-Fueled
     Domestic^Furnaces Located in Eastern Central, and Western Regions of the
     United States.  Presented at the International Symposium on Chlorinated
     Dioxins and Related Compounds, Arlington, VA, October 25-29, 1981.

168. Neulicht, R.  Dioxin Analysis of Philadelphia Northwest and East Central
     Incinerators: Preliminary Summary of Results.  Midwest Research
     Institute. EPA Contract 68-02-3891  July 1, 1985.

169. New York State/ Department of Environmental Conservation Municipal Refuse
     Combustion - Recommendations for Standards and Guidelines.  February 1985
     22 pp.

170. Niessen, W.  R.  Production of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxins (PCDD)
     and Dibenzofurans (PCDF)  from Resource Recovery Facilities.   Part II
     Presented at 1984 National  Waste Processing Conference-Engineering:'  The
     Solution.  Orlando,  Fla.   June 3-6,  1984.                    .
172.  North County Recycling and Energy Recovery Center.
     Trace Element and Organic Emissions.  April 1984.
                                                         Risk Assessment for
173. (Northrop Services, Inc.)  How to Operate the Hazardous Waste
     Incinerator.  In: Course Notes, Hazardous Waste Incinerator Session, Air
     Toxics Course 86.  November 10, 1983. 54 pp.
     £lnn'DA* B' r^l^T of HC1 and Chlorinated Organic Compound Emissions
     from Refuse Fired Waste-to-Energy Systems. (Draft) Prepared for U S
     Environmental Protection Agency, ORD, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1983.

175. O'Connell, W. L. Distribution of Data on the Emission of Dioxins from
     Incinerators.  Presented at Southwestern Ohio Chapter APCA Specialty
     Meeting on Air Toxics, May 31, 1984.

176. O'Hara P. A., and R. C. Ahlert.  Mechanisms of Formation of
     Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins in Municipal  Incinerators.
                                      A-16
-------
 177.  Olie,  K.,  et al.  Chlorodibenzo-p-dioxins and Chlorodibenzo-furans are
      Trace  Components of Fly Ash and Flue Gas of Some Municipal Incinerators
      in the Netherlands.  Chemosphere.  Volume 6, 1977.  pp. 455-459.

 178.  Olie,  K.,  et al.  Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins and Related Compounds
      in Incinerator Effluents.  From Pergamon Series on Environmental Science
      Volume 5 - Chlorinated Dioxins and Related Compounds Impact on the
      Environment.  1982.  pp. 227-244.

 179.  Olie,  K.,  et al.  Formation and Fate of PCDD and PCDF from Combustion
      Processes.  Chemosphere, Volume 12, No. 4/5, 1983, pp.  627-636.

 180.  Olie,  K. and 0.  Hutzinger.   Detection of Polychlorodibenzodioxins in Fly
      Ash and Flue Gas of Municipal  Incinerators.   Recent Developments in Mass
      Spectrometry in  Biochemistry and Medicine.  (Proceedings of the 4th
      International Symposium.) Alberto Frigerio,  ed. Volume  1, 1978. pp.
      555-562.                                                         H

 181.  Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Air Resources Branch.  Report on
      Combustion Testing Program at the Swaru Plant,  Hamilton-Wentworth.
      (Prepared  by Envirocon Limited) January 1984.

'182.  Ozyacic, V., Wong G.,  Tosine H., Clement R.  E., and J.  Osborne
      Emissions  of Chlorinated Organics from Two Municipal Incinerators in
      Ontario.  For Presentation at the 77th Annual Meeting of the Air
      Pollution  Control Association.  San Francisco,  Calif.  June 24-29, 1984.

 183.  Peters, J. A., T. W. Hughes and R. E. Mournighan.   Evaluation of
      Hazardous  Waste  Incineration in a Cement Kiln at San Juan Cement.  In:
      Incineration & Treatment of Hazardous Waste - Proceedings of the Ninth
      Annual Research  Symposium.   EPA-600/9-84-015, U.S.  Environmental .
      Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio  July 1984.  p. 210-24.

 184.  Peters, J. A. (Monsanto Research Corp.).  Evaluation of Hazardous Waste
   *  Incineration in  Cement Kilns at San Juan Cement Company. (Prepared for
      Incineration Research Branch,  Industrial Research  Laboratory, U.S.
      Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio  45268) Contract No.
      68-03-3025, January 1983.
                                                  I
 185.  Raloff, J.  Dioxin: Is Everyone Contaminated?  Science  News  Vol. 128
      July 13, 1985.  pp. 26-29.

 186.  Rao, K. R. (editor).  Pentachloroohenol: Chemistry. Pharmacology, and
      Environmental Toxicology. Plenum Press, New York,  1978.

 187.  Rappe, C.   Analysis of Polychlorinated Dioxins  and Furans.  Environmental
      Science Technology.  Vol. 18,  No. 3, 1984  pp.  78-90.
                                       A-17
-------
188. Rappe, C.  Source & Identification, Especially With Respect to PCDDs and
     PCDFs Found in Emissions of Incinerators.

189. Rappe, C., et al_.  Dioxins, Dibenzofurans, and Other Polyhalogenated
     Aromatics:  Production, Use, Formation, and Destruction.  Annals of the
     New York Academy of Sciences.  Volume 320.  pp. 1-18.

190. Rappe, C., et al_.  Formation of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins  (PCDDs)
     and Dibenzofurans (PCDF) by Burning or Heating Chlorophenates.
     Chemosphere.  Volume 7, 1978.  pp. 269-281.

191. Rappe, C., et a]..  Occupational Exposure to Polychlorinated Dioxins and
     Dibenzofurans.  From Fergamon Series on Environmental Science Volume 5 -
     Chlorinated Dioxins and Related Compounds Impact on the Environment.
     1982.  pp. 495-513.

192. Rappe, C., et al_.  Polychlorinated Dioxins, Dibenzofurans, and other
     Polynuclear Aromatics Formed During PCB Fires.  Chemica Scripta,
     Volume 20, 1982, pp. 56-61.

193. Rappe, C. and S. Marklund.  Thermal Degradation of Pesticides and
     Xenobiotics: Formation of Polychlorinated Dioxins and Dibenzofurans.
     Pesticide Chemistry: Human Welfare and Environment, Proc. Int. Congress
     Pesticide Chem., 5th, Volume 3, 1983,  pp. 317-322.

194. Rappe, C., S. Marklund, P. A. Bergquist, and M. Hansson.  Polychlorinated
     Dibenzo-p-dioxins, Dibenzofurans,  and Other Polynuclear Aromatics Formed
     During Incineration and Polychlorinated Biphenyl Fires.  In: Chlorinated
     Dioxin and Dibenzofurans in the Total  Environment.  Chanter 7.
     Choudhary, G., Keith, L.H. Rappe,  C. (eds) Buttersworth Publishers 1983.

195. Rawls, R. L.  Dow Finds Support, Doubt for Dioxin Ideas.  Chemical and
     Engineering News.  February 12, 1979.   pp. 23-29.

196.-Redford, D. P.,  C. L. Haile and R. M.  Lucas.  Emissions of RCDDs and
     PCDFs from Combustion Sources.  Presented at The International Symposium
     on Chlorinated Dioxins and Related Compounds.  Arlington, Virqinia,
     October 25-29, 1981.

197. Rghei, H. 0. and G. A. Eiceman.  Adsorption and Thermal Reactions of
     1,2,3,4-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin on Fly Ash from a Municipal
     Incinerator.  Chemosphere.  Volume 11, No. 6, 1982, pp. 569-576.

198. Rghei, H. 0. and G. A. Eiceman.  Adsorption and Chlorinateion of
     Dibenzo-p-Dioxin and 1 Chlorodibenxo-p-Dioxin on Fly Ash from Municipal
     Incinerators.  Chemosphere, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp 421-426, 1984.

199. Rghei, H. 0. and G. A. Eiceman.  Effect of Matrix on Heterogenous Phase
     Chlorine Substitution Reactions for Dibenzo-p-dioxin and HCL in Air.
     Chemosphere Vol. 14, No. 2, pp  167-171, 1985.
                                      A-18
-------
200. Sachdev, A. K. and  I. J. Man/an.  Thermal Destruction of Chlorophenol
     Residues.  Prepared for Environmental Protection Service, Canada.  July
     1983.  107 pp.

201. Samuelson, U. and A. Lindskog.   Chlorinated Compounds  in Emissions  from
     Municipal Incineration.  Chemosphere, Vol.  12, No. 4/5, pp 665-668,
     1983.

202. Sawyer, T., et a]_.  Bioanalysis of Polychlorinated Dibenzofuran  and
     Dibenzo-p-dioxin Mixtures in Fly Ash.  Paper Presented  at the 3rd
     International Symposium on Chlorinated Dioxins and Related Compounds.
     Salzburg, Austria, October 12-14, 1982.

203. Sawyer, T., et al_.  Bioanalysis of Polychlorinated Dibenzofuran  and
     Dibenzo-p-dioxin Mixtures in Fly Ash.  Chemosphere 12:  529-535,  1983.

204. Scharsach, A.  Incinerator Emission Control Technology  - Present and
     Future Processes.  Ontario Ministry of Energy - Energo  583:  Energy
     Opportunities in Biomass Symposium, Toronto, Mar. 6-9,  1983.

205. (Scott Environmental Services.)  Sampling and Analysis  of Chlorinated
     Organic Compound Emissions from the Hampton Waste-to-Energy System.
     March 1985.

206. Shaub. W. M.  Containment of Dioxin Emissions from Refuse Fired Thermal
     Processing Units - Prospects and Technical  Issues. NBSIR 84-2872, U.S.
     National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C.  April 1984.  150 pp.

207. Shaub, W. M.  Technical Issues Concerned with PCDD and  PCDF Formation and
     Destruction in MSW Fired Incinerators.  NBSIR 84-2975,  U.S. National
     Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C., November 1984.   41 pp.

208. Shaub, W. M. and Wing Is.ang.  Dioxin Formation in Incinerators.
     Environmental Science and Technology, Vol.  17, p. 721,  December 1980.

209. Shen, T. T.  Air Quality Impact of Trace Contaminants from Coal
     Conversion.  From: Proceedings of the Governors Conference on Expanding
     the Use of Coal in New York State:  Problems & Issues,  May 21-22, 1981
     Albany, N.Y.

210. Shih, C., e£ al_.  (TRW, Inc.) Emissions of  Polychlorinated
     Dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs) and Dibenzofurans (PCDFs) from the Combustion
     of Fossil Fuels, Wood, and Coal Refuse.  (Prepared for  U.S. Environmental
     Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC) EPA Contract
     No. 68-02-3138.  December 1980.

211. Shih, C., fit al.  (TRW, Inc.)  POM Emissions from Stationary Conventional
     Combustion Processes, with Emphasis on Polychlorinated  Compounds of
     Dibenzo-p-dioxin (PCDDs), Biphenyl (PCBs), and Dibenzofuran (PCDFs).
     (Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle
     Park, NC) EPA Contract No. 68-02-3138.  September 1979.
                                      A-19
-------
212. Short, H. Dioxin Cleanup Methods Get Worldwide Attention.  Chemical
     Engineering, Nov. 26, 1984.

213. Sigsby, J.E.  Dioxins in Mobile Sources Particles.  U.S. Environmental
  *  Protection Agency, Mobile Source Measurements Research Section.
     February 23, 1982.

214. Smith, R. J.  Dioxins Have Been Present Since the Advent of  Fire,  Says
     Dow.  Science.  Volume 202.  December 1978.  pp. 1166-1167.

215. Smith, R. M., et a]_.  Analysis for 2,3,7,8-TCDD and 2,3,7,8-TCDF  in  a
     Soot Sample from a Transformer Explosion in Binghamton, NY.  Chemosphere,
     Volume 2, No. 8, 1982,  pp. 715-720.

216. Stanley, 0. S. et al.  Quality Assurance Program for Combustion Source
     Studies.  In: Identification and Analysis Q,f__Qcganic Pollutants in Air,
     L. H. Keith (ed.)  Butterworth Publishers 1984. pp. 459-473.

217. State of California Air Resources Board.  Air Pollution Control at
     Resource Recovery Facilities - Final Report.  May 24, 1984.  393 pp.

218. State of Washington.  Letter from C. Jonathan Neel, District Supervisor
  *  to Ms. Karen Karl.  Nov. 28, 1984.

219. Stehl, R. H., and L. L. Lamparski.  Combustion of Several
     2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxy Compounds:  Formation of 2,3,7,8-TCDD.  Science
     Volume 197.  September 1977.  pp. 1008-1009.

220. Stretz, L. A., et al.  Controlled Air Incineration of PCP-Treated Wood.
     (Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Industrial
     Environmental Research Laboratory) 1982.

221. (Swiss Federal Office of Environmental Protection)  Environmental
     Pollution Due to Dioxins and Furans from Communal Rubbish Incineration
     Plants.  Schriftenreihe Umweltschutz.  No. 5., 1982.

222. Taylor, M. L. et al_.  Assessments of Incineration Processes as Sources of
     Supertoxic Chlorinated Hydrocarbons: Concentration of Polychlorinated
     Dibenzo-p-dioxins/Dibenzofurans and Possible Precursor Compounds in
     Incinerator Effluents.  Chapter 8.  In:   Chlorinated Dioxins and Dibenzo-
     furans in the Total  Environment.  G.  Choudhary, L. H. Keith, and
     C. Rappe  eds.  Butterworth Publishers,  Ann Arbor Science Book, 1983.

223. (TDI, Inc.)  The Dibenzofurans.  (Prepared for U.S. Environmental
     Protection Agency, Washington,  D.C.) EPA Contract No. 68-03-2919. 1981.

224. Teller, A. J. and J. D. Lauber.  Control of Dioxin Emissions from
     Incineration.  Paper presented at the 76th Annual Meeting and Exhibition
     of the Air Pollution Control Association,  Atlanta, Georgia.  June 19-24,
     1983.
                                      A-20
-------
225. Test Report for Toxic Screening at the Philadelphia Northwest Municipal
     Incinerator. EPA Contract No. 68-02-3960.

226. Tiernan, M. L. et al_.  Chlorodibenzodioxins, Chlorodibenzofurans, and
     Related Compounds in the Effluent from Combustion Processes.
     Chemosphere, Volume 12, No. 4/5, 1983, pp. 565-606.

227. Tiernan, T. 0.,  Chlorodibenzodioxins and Chlorodibenzofurans: An
     Overview.  In: Detoxification of Hazardous Wastes, Ann Arbor Science.
     Publishers, 1982.  pp. 243-260.

228. Tiernan, T. 0., et al_.  Characterization of Toxic Components in the
     Effluent from a Refuse-Fired Incinerator.  Resources and Conservation.
     Volume 9, 1982, pp. 343-354.

229. Tong, H. Y. et al_.  Identification of Orange Compounds Obtained from
     Incineration of Municipal Waste by High-Performance Liquid
     Chromatographic Fractionation and Gas Chromatogrpahy-Mass Spectrometry.
     Journal of Chromatography 285 (1984) 423-441.

230. Townsend, D. E. (Dow Chemical).  The Use of Dioxin Isotner Group Ratios to
     Identify Sources and Define Background Levels of Dioxins in the
     Environment.  Journal of Environmental Science and Health.  Volume B15,
     1980.  pp. 571-609.

231. Townsend, D. I.  Change of Isomer Ratio and Fate of Polychlorinated-p-
     dioxins in the Environment.  Chemosphere, Vol. 12, No. 9/5, pp. 637-643,
     1983.

232. Tremblay, J. W.  The Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of the
     Industrial Hygiene Program Used During the Disposal of Herbicide Orange.
     In: Human and Environmental Risks of Chlorinated Dioxins and Related
     Compounds, 1983. R. E. Tucker, A. L. Young, and A. P. Gray (eds).

233. U. S. Army Environmental Hygiene Agency.  Incineration of Pentachloro-
     phenol-Treated Wood, Tooele Army Depot, Tooele, Utah. 19-30 October 1981,
     and 14-30 June 1982.

234. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.  PCB Disposal by Thermal
  *  Destruction.  NTIS - PB82-241860, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
     Dallas,.TX, June 1981.

235. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.  Unpublished EPA Sewage Sludge
     Task Force Report.

236. (U. S. Conference of Mayors)  Resource Recovery Activities.  Waste Age,
     pg. 56, November 1983.
                                      A-21
-------
237. U. S. DOE,  Report  on  the  1980  Manufacturing  Industries  Energy  Consumption
     Study and Survey of Large Combustors,  DOE/EIA-0358,  January  1983.

238> H'Ji Environmental Protection Agency.  Application  of  Combustion
     Modifications to Industrial  Combustion  Equipment,  EPA-600/7-79-015a,
     January  1979.

239. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.  Kraft  Pulping:  Control  of  TRS
     Emissions from Existing Mills.   EPA-450/2-78-003b, March  1979.

240. Velzy, C.O.  ASME's Role  in  Developing  Standards for Measurement of
     Dioxin Emissions.

241. Versar,  Inc.  Memorandum.  Method for  Characterization  of Toxic Emissions
     from the Burning of Waste Oil, from Shiv Krishnan, February  13, 1984.

242. Viau, A.C., S. M.  Studak,  and  F. W. Karasek.   Comparative Analysis of
     Hazardous Compounds on Fly-Ash from Municipal  Waste  Incineration by Gas
     Chromatography/ Mass  Spectrometry.  Canadian Journal of Chemistry,
     Nov. 1984,  62 (11).

243. Vick, R. D., et al_.   Organic Emissions  from Combustion  of Combination
     Coal Refuse .to Produce Electricity.  Chemosphere.  Volume 7, 1978
     pp. 893-902.

244. Villaneuva, E. C., et a!.  Chlorodibenzo-p-dioxin  Contamination of Two
     Commercially Available Pentachlorophenols.  Journal  of  Agricultural and
     Food Chemistry.  Volume 21,  No.  4. July/August 1973.  pp. 739-740.

245. Wang, D. K. W. et  al_.  Sampling  and Analytical  Methodologies for PCDDs
     and PCDFs in Incinerators  and  Wood Burning Facilities.  In Environmental
     Science and Research, 1983,  Vol. 26 No.  Human and Environmental Risks
     of Chlorinated Dioxins and Related Compounds   pp.  113-126.
246. Weston, R. F.  Results of the Silvex Test Burn DRE's
.  *  September 9, 1983.
Draft Report.
247. Witness Statement from Ozvacic, V. M.,  Ministry of the Environment,
     concerning Magnitude of Dioxin and Furan Emissions from the Proposed
     Energy Waste Plant, Victoria Hospital Corporation. Westminster Campus,
     London Ontario.  January 11, 983.  10 pp.

248. Wong, T.S. Dioxin Formation and Destruction Combustion Processes.
     For presentation at the 77th Annual Meeting of the Air Pollution Control
     Association, San Francisco, Calif.  June 24-29, 1984.

249. Yakowitz, H.  Background Information With Respect to Dioxin Issues
     Associated With Incineration of Municipal Solid Waste.  ENV/WMP/85.11
     Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development, Paris, France.
     February 22, 1985. 34 pp.
                                      A-22
-------
-------
     APPENDIX B



LITERATURE DATA BASE
-------
-------
                     Dioxin Literature Data Base
Key to Abbreviations	B-!
Municipal Solid Waste Combustors	B-2
Fossil Fuel Combustion	B-51
Sewage Sludge Incinerators	   B-53
Wood Combustion	   B-54
Boilers Cofiring Wastes  	  	 	 B-61
Hazardous Waste Incinerators	B-67
Lime/Cement Kilns 	 	 B-79
Hospital Incinerators 	 B-80
Wire Reclamation Incinerator	B-83
PCB F^es	'	B-84
Automobile Emissions	   B-88
Thermal Activated Carbon Regeneration ....  	 B-89
Experimental	   B_97
                                n
-------
-------
                             KEY TO ABBREVIATIONS "
REF #/
dscm
ESP
FA
FG
9
GC
GS
HRGC
HRMS
M3
MM5T
MS   -
N/A
NO
ng
NM3
PART
ppb
ppm
ppt
ug
Reference Number/Sample or Sample Number
Dry Standard Cubic Meter
Electrostatic Precipitator
Fly Ash
Flue Gas
Gram
Gas Chromatography
Grab Sample
High Resolution Gas Chromatography
High Resolution Mass Spectrophotometry
Cubic Meter
Modified Method 5 Train
Mass Spectrophotomer
Not Available
Not Detected
Nanogram = 10~9 grams
Normal Cubic Meter
Particulate Phase Sample
Parts Per Billion
Parts Per Million
Parts Per Trillion
Micrograms = 10~6 grams
Preliminary Data or Draft  Report
                                     B-l
-------
-------
HICIPAL SOLID WASTE
iEF t
ISOMER
ISOMER CONC.    PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD
12/SM 283
12/SM 294
12/MA-LFU
12/LFI-NW
12/S-LFU
12/SM03.81
21/2A/A
21/2A/A
21/2A/A
21/2A/A
21/2A/A
21/2A/B
21./2A/B
21/2A/B
21/2A/B
21/2A/B
21/2B/A
21/SI/J.
21/2B/A
21/2B/A
21/2B/A
21/2B/B
21/2B/B
21/2B/B
21/2B/B
21/2B/B
25/A
25/A
25/A
25/A
25/A
25/A
_ _• / .
25/A

25/A

25/A
-fc _ • .
25/A
25/A
_ _ • .
25/A
25/A
25/A
25/A
4« • / •
25/A
OCDD
OCDD
OCDD
OCDD
OCDD
OCDD
2378-TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDD
i :•<••>">
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
OCDF

TCDD

TCDF

P5CDD

P 5CDF
H6CDD

H6CDF
H7CDD
H7CDF
OCDD
OCDF
1 ug/kg
13 ug/kg
15 ug/kg
800 ug/kg
520 ug/kg
<0.5 ug/kg
< 1 ng/nm3
< 1 ng/nm3
< 1 ng/nm3
< 1 ng/nm3
2.3 ng/nm3
< 6 ng/nm3
< 1 ng/nm3
< 2 ng/nm3
< 1 ng/nm3
< .1 ng/nm3
< 1 ng/nm3
< 1 -.i;j/Tm3
"< 2 ng/nm3
< 2 ng/nm3
< 1 ng/nm3
< 1 ng/nm3
< 1 ng/nm3
< 1 ng/nm3
< 1 ng/nm3
< 2 ng/nm3
10 ng/g
266 ng/g
718 ng/g
1220 ng/g
498 ng/g
468 ng/g

—

^

™"

^
24 ppb

*™
37 ppb
25 ppb
109 ppb
M ^ •t
27 ppb
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
FUME
FUME
FUME
FUME
FUME
FUME








—————


—————
—————
__ _ _ —

FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG .
FG
FG
FG
FG .
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
PART .
PART.
PART .
PART .
PART .
PART.
T?A
S A
V A
f A
T? A
£ A
T? A
r A
FA
TTA
r A
FA
FA
'"""
i' i^
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
GS

GS
\J w
GS
V W
GS
V W
GS
GS

GS
GS
r''
.
                                      B-2
-------
iUNICIPAL SOLID  WASTE
  REP  *
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD
25/B
25/B
25/B
25/B
25/B
25/B
25/B
25/B
25/B
25/B
25/B
25/B
25/B
25/B
25/B
25/B
25/C
25/C
25/C
25/C
25/C
25/C
25/C
25/C
25/C
25/C
25/C
25/C
25/C
25/C
25/C
25/C
25
25
25
25
25
25
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD '
H7CDD
OCDD
OCDP
TCDD
TCDF
P5CDD
P5CDF
H6CDD
H6CDF
H7CDD
H7CDF
OCDD
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
OCDF
TCDD
TCDF
P5CDD
P5CDF
H6CDD
H6CDF
H7CDD
H7CDF
OCDD
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
OCDF
65 ng/g
291 ng/g
621 ng/g
737 ng/g
213 ng/g
68 ng/g
0.6 ppb
3.2 ppb
3.2 ppb
- 21.5 ppb
18.5 ppb
34.5 ?pb
41.5 ppb
50.5 ppb
96 ppb
10.3 ppb
4 ng/g
114 ng/g
263 ng/g
438 ng/g
-168 ng/g
138 ng/g
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
-
100 ppb
24 ppb
85 ng/g
165 ng/g
595 ng/g
835 ng/g
520 ng/g
125 ng/g
FUME
FUME
FUME
FUME
FUME
FUME
_____
-----












	 ,_


FUME
FUME
FUME
FUME '
FUME
FUME
















_____
_____
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
KSP
ESF
PART .
PART.
PART.
PART .
PART.
PART.
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
11 .<
..• _-,
1'A
FA
FA
'FA
PART.
PART.
PART 0
PART.
PART.
PART.
FA
FA
FA .
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
"•' A
F/
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
(•n
<-n
GS
GS
GS
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
(JS
fcS
                                        B-3
-------
IUNICIPAL  SOLID WASTE
 REF  *
ISOMER
ISOMER CONC.
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD
26 /Al ?3
ff \J f ff^ L .i. *J
26/A123
26/A123
26/A123
26/A123
26/B
26/B
26/B
26/B
26/B
26/C
26/C
26/C
26/C
26/C
32/1
32/1
32/1
32/1
32/1
32/1
32/1
32/1
32/1
32/1
32/1
32/1
32/2
32/2
32/2
32/2
32/2
32/2
32/2
32/2
32/2
32/2
32/2
32/2
, ,
33

r * » i i / r
H7CDD
H7CDF
OCDD
OCDF
H6CDD/F
H7CDD
H7CDF
OCDD
OCDF
H6CDD/F
H7CDD
H7CDF
OCDD
OCDF
2378-TCDD
T4CDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDF
T4CDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
2378-TCDD
T4CDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDF
T4CDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
PCED
PCDF

1* t"
90.7 ppb
49.3 ppb
120 ppb
43.6 ppb
ND
6 ppb
ND
12 ppb
ND
ND
5 ppb
ND
5 ppb

0.38 ng/m3
17 ng/m3
170 ng/m3
170 ng/o3
140 ng/m3
. ,, 17 ng/m3
2.2 ng/m3
41 ng/m3
40 ng/m3
9.3 ng/m3
2.2 ng/m3
< 2 ng/m3
0.45 ng/m3
14 ng/m3
97 ng/m3
53 ng/m3
71 ng/m3
< 10 ng/m3
2.1 ng/m3
33 ng/m3
21 ng/m3
3.9 ng/m3
< 1 ng/m3
< 2 ng/tn3
0.2 pptn
0.1 ppm
K //
*" / *^
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N'/A
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
SI/M.
STACK
STACK
STACK
5 T /•<;]•
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
Stack/ESP
Stack/ESP
FA
c n
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
SA
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
i r
FG
FG
FG
~ r.
FG
FG
FG
FG
FA
FA
CS
w w
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
<-f>
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
T kA '1. ' ;
T ' . ' '
TRAIN
TRAIN
TP£ II1
'<. > I"''
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
N/A
N/A
                                     B-4
-------
MUNICIPAL .SOLID WASTE
  REP
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG
                                           PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD
43/#l
43/*l
43/*l
43/#l
43/#l
^r./-"i
^3/*l
43/fl
43/*l
43/*l
43/#l
43/*l
43/#l
43/#l
43/#2
43/J2
43/*2
43/#2
s 43/*2
43/#2
43/#2
43/*2
43/#2
43/*2
437*2
43/#2
43/J2
43/#2
43/*2
43/#2
43/*2
43/*2
43/*2
A3/J"r?
•^•3 /<":•
43/*3
43/#3
43/#3
43/#3
43 /#3
43/#3
43/#3
43 /#3
43/#3
T4CDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
08CDD
T4CE?
08CDF
T4CDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
08CDD
T4CDF
08CDF
TCDD
PSCDI'
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
ocr-F
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
19.6 ng/Nm3
27.9 ng/Nm3
178.2 ng/Nm3
159.6 ng/Nm3
63.9 ng/Nm3
KD
59.3 ng/Nm3
1.1 ng/Nm3
2.7 ng/Nm3
11.5 ng/Nm3
" 1 .03 ng/Nm3
8 ng/Nm3
ND
2.2 ng/Nm3
0.25 ppb
1.7 ppb
294 ppb
8.9 ppb
295 ppb
0.46 ppb
15.8 ppb
172^2 ng/Nm3
172.3 ng/No3
12015 ng/Nm3
575 ng/Nm3
7312 ng/Nm3
75 ng/Nm3
2883 ng/Mm3
17 ng/Nm3
107 ng/Nn3
26620 ng/Nm3
828 ng/Nm3
1179 ng/Mm3
108.6 ng/Nm3
4390 ng/Nm3
ND
0.92 ppb
1.8 ppb
3 .1 ppb
1.5 ppb
0.8 ppb
3.3 ppb
0.037 ng/Nm3
0.3 ng/Nm3
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Dust Col.
T'vst Col.
Dust Col.
Dust Col.
Dust Col.
Dust Col.
Dust Col.
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Dust Col.
Dust Col.
Dust Col.
Dust Col.
Dust Col.
Dust Col.-
Dust Col.
Stack
St*c\
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
TA
Train
Train
Train
Train
Train
Train
Train
Train
Train
Train
Train
Train
Train
Train
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
Train
Train
Train
Train
Train
Train
Train
Train
Train
Train
Train
Train
Train
Train
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
Train
T i • . - ili
                                         B-5
-------
HICIPAL SOLID WASTE
REF *
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD
43/#3
43/*3
43/#3
43/#3
43/#3
43/J3
43/#3
43 / #3
4:-/vj
43/#3
43/#3
43 / £3
43/v«.
43/#4
43/#4
43/#4
43/#4
43/*4
43/#4
.. 43/#4
43/J4
43/*4
43/#4
43/#4
43/*4
43/#4
43/*4
43/#4
43/#4
43/V-4
4';/?"4
43/#4
43/M
43/#5
43/*5
43/#5
43/#5
43/#5
43/#5
43/#5
43/#5
43/#5
43/#5
43/#5
43/#5
43/#5
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
Hecr.D
F7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
OCDF
: err-
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
f.'fTI-
TCDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
6.7 ng/Nm3
0.2 ng/Nm3
1.7 ng/Nm3
2.57 ng/Nm3
0.08 ng/Nm3
19 ng/Hm3
40 ng/Nm3
6542 ng/Nia3
124 ng/Nm3
776 ng/Nm3
429 ng/Hm3
- 1010 ng/Nm3
'if' « 4 ppb
65.4 ppb
2496 ppb
87.9 ppb
841.5 ppb
61.7 ppb
255 ppb
10.9 ng/Nm3
2.8 ng/Nm3
0.54 ng/Nm3
-- 3>«2 ng/Nm3
39 ng/Nm3
3.7 ng/Nm3
0.06 ng/Nm3
60 ng/Nm3
33 ng/Nm3
1390 ng/Nm3
167 ng/Nm3
f7f3 ng/Hm3
1814 ng/Nm3
1760 ng/Nm3
0.7 ppb
0.05 ppb
0.021 ppb
0.007 ppb
0.1 ppb
1.18 ppb
0.0015 ppb
0.34 ng/Nm3
2.4 ng/Nm3
196 ng/Nm3
9.9 ng/Nm3
173 ng/Nm3
75.3 ng/Mm3
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Dust Col.
Dust Col.
Dust Col.
Dust Col.
Dust Col.
Dust Col.
Dust Col.
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Dust . Col .
Dust . Col .
Dust . Col *
Dust . Col .
Dust . Col .
Dust . Col .
rust . 
-------
MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE
  REF *,
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG
PROCESSES   SAMPLE
METHOD
43/#5
43/#5
43 /#5
43/#5
43/*5
.'. 3 / 4: "
''-': '{'"•
43/#5
43/#6
43/#6
43/J6
43 / #6
43/#6
43/#6
43/#6
43/#6
43/#6
43/#6
'• 43/^6
43/#6
43/#6
43/#6
43/^6
43/#6
43/#6
43/#6
43/*6
43/#6
43/#6
44/A
44/A
44/A
44/A
44/A
44/A
44/A
44/A
AA/A
• / *^«
44/A
44/A
44/A
44/A
44/A
44/A
OCDF
TCDD
p 5cr-r/
H6CDD
H7CDD
r-.rr1?
TCDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
K7CDB
OCDD
TCDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
' H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
11 7 p "1 Tt
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
3.2 ng/Nm3
9.6 ng/Nm3
/I ng/l-isfj
328 ng/Nm3
46 ng/Nm3
7. 4 A ns/Nm3
305 ng/Nm3
89 ng/Nm3
ND
ND
ND
0.0012 ppb
5.86 ppb
ND
1.93 ppb
NE
0.01 ng/Nm3
0.28 ng/Nm3
?»'!>
0.51 ng/Nm3
ND
" " ND
19 Qg/Nm3
11 ng/Nm3
480 ng/Nm3
6 ng/Nm3
71 ng/Nm3
27 ng/Nm3
24 ng/Km3
10 ppb
269 ppb
390 ppb
11 ppb
8 ppb
46 ppb
153 ppb
1712 ppb
•'i ~ n V> 1)
_____
	
_ 	
_ 	
	 	

Stack
Stack
Stat.lt
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Dust Col.
Dust Col.
Dust Col.
Dust Col.
Dust Col.
Dust Col.
Dust Co 1 .
£t*ck
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
S tacit
Stack
Stack
Stack
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
FA
FG
FC-
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
F/-
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
rr
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
Train
Train
Train
Train
Train
Train
Train
Train
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
r-s
TraJn
Train
Train
Train
Train .
Train
Train
Train
Train
Train
Train
Train
Train
Train
N/A
N/A
__ j .
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
                                        B-7
-------
ECIPAL SOLID WASTE
!F *      ISOMER
ISOMER CONG
                                        PROCESSES   SAMPLE
                                      METHOD
44/A
44/A
44/A
44/A
44/A
44/A
44/A
44/A
-------
MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE
  SEP #
I SOMES.
ISOMER GONG
PROCESSES   SAMPLE
METHOD
47/037
47/037
47/037
47/037
47/037
47/038
47/038
47/038
47/038
47/038
47/039
47/039
47/039
47/039
47/039
47/040
, 47/040
47/040
47/040
47/040
47/041
47/041
47/041
47/041
47/041
47/042
47/042
47/042
47/042
47/042
47/043
47/043
47/043
47/043
47/043
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
' P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
20 ng/g
22 ng/g
13 ng/g
3 ng/g
4 ng/g
20 ng/g
23 ng/g
16 ng/g
5 ng/g
5 ng/g
27 ng/g
30 ng/g
19 ng/g
5 ng/g
5 ng/g
68 ng/g
73 ng/g
- • - 46 ng/g
12 ng/g
18 ng/g
18 ng/g
19 ng/g
13 ng/g
4 ng/g .
3 ng/g
15 ng/g
17 ng/g
15 ng/g
6 ng/g
20 ng/g
15 ng/g
17 ng/g
15 ng/g
7 ng/g
14 ng/g
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
S1f(-l'
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
•FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
. FA
FA
FA
I'A
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
•'r S
( :•.
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS '
GS
                                       B-9
-------
NICIPAL SOLID WASTE
IEF
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD
47/044
47/044
47/044
47/044
47/044
47/045
47/045
^ • / » ~ »
47/045
47/045
47/045
47/046
47/046
47/046
47/046
47/046
47/047
47/047
47/047
47/047
47/047
47/048
47/048
47/048
47/048
47/048
47/049
47/049
47/049
47/049
47/049
47/050
47/t050
47/050
47/050
47/050
TCDD
P5CDD .
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
P 5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
18 ng/g
21 ng/g
19 ng/g
8 ng/g
18 ng/g
17 ng/g
22 ng/g
18 ng/g
8 ng/g
21 ng/g
28 ng/g
. J34 ng/8
32 ng/g
7 ng/g
8 ng/g
21 ng/g
25 ng/g
17 ng/g
5 ng/g
3 ng/g
31 ng/g
33 ng/g
17 ng/g
4 ng/g
2 ng/g
25 ng/g
28 ng/g
22 ng/g
13 ng/g
31 ng/g
35 ng/g
30 ng/g
24 ng/g
11 ng/g
27 ng/g
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK ...
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA •
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA -
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
f* C<
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
                                    B-10
-------
MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE
  REF *
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD
49/PT2
49/PT2
49/PT2
49/PT3
49/PT3
49/PT3
49/PT3
49/PT3
49/PT3
49/PT3
49/PT3
49/PT3
49/PT3
49/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT2
49/PT2
49/PT2
49/PT2
49/PT2
49/PT2
49/PT2
49/PT2
49/PT2
49/PT2
49/PT3
49/PT3
49/PT3
49/PT3
49/PT3
49/PT3
49/PT3
49/PT3
49/PT3
49/PT3
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF ..
H6CDF
H7CD.F 	
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
1.8 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0.3 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0.5 ng/g
3.7 ng/g
15.9 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0.2 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g



_____
_____
__ 	


	


__ 	
	
_____




_____
	






	




	


INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN. -
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
                                       B-ll
-------
HICIPAL  SOLID WASTE
LEF *
H9/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT2
49/PT2
49/PT2
49/PT2
49/PT2
49/PT2
49/PT2
49/PT2
49/PT2
49/PT2
49/PT3
49/PT3
49/PT3
49/PT3
49/PT3
49/PT3
49/PT3
49/PT3
49/PT3
49/PT3
49/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT2
49/PT2
49/PT2
49/PT2
ISOMER
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD.
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDP
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
ISOMER CONG.
0 ng/g
0 ng/s
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
25 ng/g
11 ng/g
8 ng/g .
6 ng/g
15 ng/g
4 ng/g
4 ng/g
5 ng/g
4 ng/g
1 ng/g
"- $2 ng/g
13 ng/g
11 ng/g
6 ng/g
10 ng/g
3 ng/g
4 ng/g
3 ng/g
3 ng/g
1 ng/g
57 ng/g
16 ng/g
11 ng/g
5 ng/g
8 ng/g
2 ng/g
2 ng/g
2 ng/g
2 ng/g
1 ng/g
0 ng/g
1 ng/g
4 ng/g
7 ng/g
PROCESSES
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
SAMPLE
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
. ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
METHOD
GS
GS
«3
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
                                       B-12
-------
MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE
  REF *
ISOMER
ISOMER CONC.
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
'METHOD
49/PT2
49/PT2
49/PT2
49/PT2
49/PT2
49/PT2
49/PT3
49/PT3
49/PT3
49/PT3
49/PT3
49/PT3
49/PT3
49/PT3
49/PT3
49/PT3
49/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT4
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
11 ng/g
1 ng/g
2 ng/g
3 ng/g
3 ng/g
1 ng/g
4 ng/g
7 ng/g
17 ng/g
13 ng/g
15 ng/g
3 ng/g
3 ng/g
4 ng/g
1 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
1 ng/g
2 ng/g
.- , 4 ag/g
7 ng/g
0 ng/g
5 ng/g
1 ng/g
9 ng/g
1 ng/g
7 ng/m3
14 ng/m3
14 ng/m3
18 ng/m3
35 ng/m3
13 ng/m3
19 ng/m3
24 ng/m3
19 ng/m3
5 ng/m3
5 ng/m3
19 ng/m3
30 ng/m3
21 ng/m3
27 ng/m3
40 ng/m3
72 ng/m3
65 ng/m3
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
•ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
' FG
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
                                      B-13
-------
IICIPAL SOLID WASTE
IEF
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG.    PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD '
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
-P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
24 ng/m3
4 ng/m3
3 ng/m3
11 ng/m3
• 22 ng/m3
43 ng/m3
51 ng/m3
20 ng/m3
39 ng/m3
57 ng/m3
58 ng/m3
9 ng/m3
0 ng/m3
0 ng/m3
0 ng/m3
0 ng/m3
0 ng/m3
0 ng/m3
0 ng/m3
- ,, 0 ng/m3
0 ng/m3
17 ng/m3
0 ng/m3
0 ng/m3
0 ng/m3
0 ng/m3
0 ng/m3
0 ng/m3
0 ng/m3
0 ng/m3
0 ng/m3
14 ng/m3
0 ng/m3
0 ng/m3
0 ng/m3
0 ng/m3
0 ng/m3
0 ng/m3
0 ng/m3
0 ng/m3
0 ng/m3
13 ng/m3
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
. FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG.
FG
FG
FG
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
   49/PT5
   TCDD
   0 ng/g
GARBAGE
  GS
                                      B-1.4
-------
MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE
  REF *
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT7-
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/-PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
. P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
.H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF '
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
.0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
3.6 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
1.4 ng/g
5.1 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
'' 0 ng/g
0 ng/g
1.3 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g


-----
-----
-----
_____
_____
_____
_____
—————


— , 	
_____






	
	 __
_____
—————


— ___


— ___


— ___
_____
_____
_____
—————
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
                                      B-15
-------
UICIPAL SOLID WASTE
IEF
ISOMER
                          ISOMER  CONG.   PROCESSES   SAMPLE
                                                     METHOD
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
56 ng/g
22 ng/g
17 ng/g
11 ng/g
51 ng/g
-- ,,2 ng/g
4 ng/g
5 ng/g
9 ng/g
3 ng/g
150 ng/g
48 ng/g
33 ng/g
11 ng/g
38 ng/g
3 ng/g
4 ng/g
5 ng/g
9 ng/g
3 ng/g
5 ng/g
4 ng/g
2 ng/g
2 ng/g
6 ng/g
1 ng/g
1 ng/g
1 ng/g
2 ng/g
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
                                     B-16
-------
MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE
  R1F
ISOMER
                            ISOMER  CONG
PROCESSES
                                          SAMPLE
METHOD
49/PT7
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/PT5
49/ET5
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6-
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT6
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT7
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
1 ng/g
2 ng/g
4 ng/g
13 ng/g
20 ng/g
45 ng/g
2 ng/g
6 ng/g
8 ng/g
10 ng/g
3 ng/g
1 ng/g
2 ng/g
5 ng/g
8 ng/g
15 ng/g
1 ng/g
2 ng/g
3 ng/g
-. . , 6 ng/g
1 ng/g
4 ng/g
15 ng/g
43 ng/g
78 ng/g
140 ng/g
6 ng/g
14 ng/g
19 ng/g
22 ng/g
7 ng/g
1 ng/nm3
6 ng/nm3
9 ng/nm3
16 ng/nm3
26 ng/nm3
8 ng/nm3
14 ng/nm3
18 ng/nm3
17 ng/nm3
BOILER
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM .
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
FG
- FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
. GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
                                      B-17
-------
HT.CIPA.L  SOLID WA.STE
REF
ISOMER
ISOMER  CONG
PROCESSES
                                                        SAMPLE
                                                       METHOD
49/PT8
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
9/PT10
9/PT10
9/PT10
9/PT10
9/PT10
9/PT10
9/PT10
9/PT10
9/PT10
9/PT10
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
3 ng/nm3
2 ng/nm3
9 ng/nm3
12 ng/nm3
23 ng/nm3
25 ng/nm3
18 ng/nm3
34 ng/nm3
45 ng/nm3
34 ng/nm3
4 ng/nm3
1 ng/nm3
5 ng/nm3
10 ng/nm3
17 ng/nm3
26 ng/nm3
10 ng/nm3
21 ng/nm3
32 ng/nm3
25 ng/nm3
3' ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
1 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 Qg/nm3
10 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
11 ng/nm3
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
                                      B-18
-------
MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE
  REF
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG
PROCESSES   SAMPLE
                                      METHOD
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT8
49/PT8
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF .
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
3 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
7 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0.8 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
O'ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
1.1 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
1.1 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
_____
_____
_____
_____


_____


_____
_____
	
_____
_____
_____
_____


_____
_____
_____
_____
_ 	 	
_____
_____
_____
_____


_____
_=,___
_____
_____
— ___
INCIN.
INCIN.
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
ASH
ASH
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
                                       B-19
-------
UNICIPAL SOLID WASTE
 REF
ISOMER
                           ISOMER CONG
                              PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD-
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF-
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
-- " 0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
60 ng/g
14 ng/g
9 ng/g
5 ng/g
10 ng/g
1 ng/g
2 ng/g
2 ng/g
3 ng/g
1 ng/g
21 ng/g
13 ng/g
9 ng/g
3 ng/g
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN."
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
ASH
ASH
ASH .
ASH
ASH
.ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
-------
MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE
  REF *
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
• OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
- TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
8 ng/g
16 ng/g
13 ng/g
4 ng/g
2 ng/nm3
9 ng/nm3
18 ng/nm3
40 ng/nm3
79 ng/nm3
-- 11 ng/nm3
23 ng/nm3
35 ng/nm3
36 ng/nm3
10 ng/nm3
5 ng/nm3
9 ng/nm3
19 ng/nm3
39 ng/nm3
69 ng/nm3
18 ng/nm3
--25' ng/nm3
31 ng/nm3
30 ng/nm3
8 ng/nm3
3 ng/nm3
6 ng/nm3
12 ng/nm3
22 ng/nm3
37 ng/nm3
11 ng/nm3
15 ng/nm3
19 ng/nm3
18 ng/nm3
4 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
ASH
ASH
- ASH
ASH
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
-FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
GS
GS
GS
GS
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
                                      B-21
-------
IICIPAL SOLID WASTE
IEF
ISOMER
                          ISOMER CONG
                              PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD
9/PT11
9/PT11
9/PT12
9/PT12
9/PT12
9/PT12
9/PT12
9/PT12
9/PT12
9/PT12
>9/PT12
9/PT12
9/PT13
9/PT13
9/PT13
>9/PT13
9/PT13
9/PT13
H9/PT13
^/PT13
^/PT13
t9/PT13
^9/PTll
i9/PTll
^9/PTll
!f9/PTll
&9/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12
/. ft / T» T 1 *>
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
f\f1\V
0 ng/nm3
7 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
1 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
8 ng/nm3
6 ng/nm3
2 ng/nm3
5 ng/nm3
11 ng/nm3
15 ng/nm3
0 ng/nm3
11 ng/nm3
4 ng/nm3
*15'ng/nm3
13 ng/nm3
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0.6 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
3.6 ng/g
12.5 ng/g
7.4 ng/g
3.7 ng/g
0.7 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
A «*»/*»
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER




















_____












	 __



FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
r: A BRACK
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS .
GS
ns
                                      B-22
-------
MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE
  REF #
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT8
49/PT8
'49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT8
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT9
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
49/PT10
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD.
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
4 ng/g
1 ng/g
1 ng/g
2 ng/g
1 ng/g
0 ng/g
4 ng/g
3 ng/g
3 ng/g
3 ng/g
6 ng/g
1 ng/g
1 ng/g
1 ng/g
2 ng/g
1 ng/g
1 ng/g
3 ng/g
12 ng/g
16 ng/g
.. 27 ng/g
3 ng/g
6 ng/g
7 ng/g
9 ng/g
2 ng/g
2 ng/g
5 ng/g
11 ng/g
14 ng/g
20 ng/g
6 ng/g
10 ng/g
10 ng/g
8 ng/g
2 ng/g
1 ng/g
4 ng/g
22 ng/g
33 ng/g
46 ng/g
4 ng/g
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
                                       B-23
-------
JNICIPAL  SOLID WASTE
REF  *
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
-49/PT11
49/-PT11
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT1-3
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT13
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
1.5 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g ,
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
-- -* 0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g
0 ng/g

_ — . —
_____
	


	


_____


_____
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
' INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
INCIN.
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
GARBAGE
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
' ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
  49/PT11
    TCDD
   31  ng/g
   BOILER
   ASH
    GS
                                     B-24
-------
MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE
  REF *
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT13
4.9/PT11
/»9/PTJ*
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT11
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
THOF
F5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
20 ng/g
41 ng/g
12 ng/g
28 ng/g
2 ng/g
3 ng/g
4 ng/g
6 ng/g
2 ng/g
• 78 ng/g
51 ng/g
43 ng/g
11 ng/g
19 ng/g
3 ng/g-
4 ng/g
4 ng/g
4 ng/g
2 ng/g
38 ng/g
" 2* ng/g
21 ng/g
7 ng/g
24 ng/g
1 ng/g
2 ng/g
3 ng/g
5 ng/g
2 ng/g
1 ng/g .
5 ng/g
13 ng/g
22 ng/g
50 ng/g
3 ng/g
6 ng/g
8 ng/g
9 ng/g
3 ng/g
1 ng/g
3 ng/g
6 ng/g
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
BOILER
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
                                       B-25
-------
JH1C1PAL SOLID WASTE
REF  *
          ISOMER
ISOMER CONG
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
                                                                 METHOD
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12
49/PT12 -
49/PT12
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT13
49/PT13
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
Tf.jvo
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
11 ng/g
67 ng/g
1 ng/g
4 ng/g
. 4 ng/g
14 ng/g
5 ng/g
* *£/£
3 ng/g
11 ng/g
20 ng/g
47 ng/g
2 ng/g
5 ng/g
8 ng/g
10 ng/g
4 ng/g
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
I.C ft I.C* .
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ECONOM.
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
  51
         DATA ARE CONFIDENTIAL
     69
     69
     69
     69
     69
              TCDD
              P5CDD
              H6CDD
              H7CDD
              OCDD
13.5 ppb
23.2 ppb
25.8 ppb
14.9 ppb
 6.3 ppb
    ESP
    ESP
    ESP
    ESP
    ESP
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
WEEKLY GS
WEEKLY GS
WEEKLY GS
WEEKLY GS
WEEKLY GS
      70
      70
      70
      70
      70
              TCDD
              P5CDD
              H6CDD
              H7CDD
              OCDD
 8.6 ppb
  15 ppb
  13 ppb
 3.2 ppb
 0.4 ppb
    ESP
    ESP
    ESP
    ESP
    7SP
   FA
   FA
   FA
   FA
   FA
GS
GS
GS
GS
71/Jap(#2)
  71/Net
71/0nt(#l)
71/0nt(#2)
                TCDD
                TCDD
                TCDD
                TCDD
                TCDD
 4.8 ng/g
 8.5 ng/g
 2.4 ng/g
   12 ng/g
 9.3 ng/g
    • ESP
    ESP
    ESP
    ESP
    ESP
   FA
   FA
   FA
   FA
   FA
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
                                     B-26
-------
MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE
  REF
ISOMER
                           ISOMER  CONG.    PROCESSES   SAMPLE
                                                    METHOD
87 /WET
87 /WET
87/WET
87 /WET
87/WET
'87/Normal
87/Normal
87/Noraal
87/Normal
87 /Nora* 1
87/Normal
87/Noraal
87/Normal
87/Noraal
87/Noraal
90
90
90
9H
92
92
9?
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
92
C.f;
93
9.2
97
97
97
97
97
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDP
H6CDF
H7CDP
OCDP
TCDD
TCDD
TCDF
TCTF
TCDD
P5CDP
Kfir.r-r-
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
I:f.c:EJ-
H7CDF
OCDF
2,3,7,8 T
TCDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
905 ng/Ncm
1395 ng/Ncm
2598 ng/Ncm
1964 ng/Ncm
498 ng/Ncm
26 ng/Ncm
NA ng/Ncm
68.4 ng/Ncm
62 ng/Ncni
76 ng/Ncm
309 ng/Ncm
250.3 ng/Ncm
314.2 ng/Ncm
215.1 ng/Ncm
123.8 ng/Ncm
45 ppt
10000 ppt
45000 ppt
2000 ppt
230 ng/dscm
iftfO ng/dscm
MO r. t/cscm
160 ng/dscm
41 ng/ds.cm
1100 ng/dscm
6200 ng/dscm
700 ng/dscm
200 ng/dscm
14 ng/dscm
170 ng/g
5*0 r:g/g
52 ng/g
7 .4 ng/g
2.6 ng/g
410 ng/g
1800 ng/g
C.*. r.E/s
9.5 ng/g
1 .4 ng/g
1.94 ng
31.46 ng
42.2 ng
10 ng
V*T^
AD
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Furnace
Stack
Stack
Furnace
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
ESP
F.f.P
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
T; 37
ESP
ESP
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
S t aclc

FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
Aflh
FA
FA
Ash
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FA
I'A
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
7A
FA
FA
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG

TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TF.AII"
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
GS
GS
GS
GS
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
GS
c,f>
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TF.A11

                                      B-27
-------
MICIPAL SOLID WASTE
REF *
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG.
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
1 1
100
100
100
100
100
100
101/RDF/l
101/RDF/l
101/RDF/l
101/RDF/l
101/RDF/l
101/RDF/l
101/RDF/l
101/RDF/l
101/RDF/2
101/RDF/2
101/RDF/2
101/RDF/2
101/RDF/2
101/RDF/2
101/RDF/2
101/RDF/2
101/RDF/3
101/RDF/3
101/RDF/3
101/RDF/3
101/RDF/3
101/RDF/3
101/RDF/3
1 01 /RDF/ 3
2,3,7,8 T
2,3,7,8 T
2,3,7,8 T
2,3,7,8 T
2,3,7,8 T
2,3,7,8 T
TCDD
f; i~* ~~i ""i
TCDD
TCDD
TCDF
TCDF
TCDF
TCDF
2378-TCDD
TCDD
2378-TCDF
TCDF
2378-TCDD
TCDD
2378-TCDF
TCDF
2378-TCDD
TCDD
2378-TCDF
TCDF
2378-TCDD
TCDD
2378-TCDF
TCDF
2378-TCDD
TCDD
2378-TCDF
TCDF
2378-TCDD
TCDD
2378-TCDF
TCDF
1.05 ng/m3
0.295 ng/m3
9.1 ng/m3
99.5 ng/m3
.1 0 S3 ng/m3
5.4 ng/m3
3.15 ng/m3
1. i "". ng/ni.3
29.7 ng/m3
ND
. .279.5 ng/m3
11.1 ng/m3
21 ng/m3
ND
2.1 ng/dscm
79 ng/dscm
NA
62 ng/dscm
0.3 ng/dscm
4 ng/dscm
NA
- - ,17 ng/dscm
12.2 ng/dscm
142 ng/dscm
NA
27 ng/dscm
11.3 ng/dscm
228 ng/dscm
NA
1055 ng/dscm
1.9 ng/dscm
46 ng/dscm
NA
86 ng/dscm
1 .7 ng/dscm
22 ng/dscm
NA
128 ng/dscm
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
_____
Stack
Stack
Stack
-----
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
f* m A y-i •»••
'"* ! «*, * !•
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
. FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
Feed
FG
FG
FG . . _
Feed
PART .
PART.
PART .
PART.
FG
FG
FG
FG
PART .
PART.
PART.
PART .
"• / .
FG
FG
FG
PART .
PART.
PART.
PART.
FG
FG
FG
FG
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
GS
MM5T
MM5T
	 MH5T-
GS
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
T T ". ~i'
1 1 .' J
MM 5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
                                    B-28
-------
MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE
  REF
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG.   PROCESSES   SAMPLE
METHOD
101/M-,/]
101/MB/l
101/MB/l
101/MB/l
101/MB/l
101/MB/l
101/MB/l
101/MB/l
101/MB/2
101/MB/2
101/MB/2
101/MB/2
101/MB/3
101/MB/3
101/MB/3
101/MB/3
101/MOD/l
'3CJ/I < .]*./!
101/MOD/l
101/MOD/l
101/MOD/2
101/MOD/2
101/MOD/2
101/MOD/2
101/MOD/2
101/MOD/2
101/MOD/2
101/MOD/2
109
109
109
109
115
115
115
2378-TCDD
TCDD
2378-TCDF
TCDF
2378-TCDD
TCDD
2378-TCDF
TCDF
2378-TCDD
icrr.
2378-TCDF
TCDF
2378-TCDD
TCDD
2378-TCDF
TCDF
2378-TCDD
mn
2378-TCDF
TCDF
2378-TCDD
TCDD
2378-TCDF
TCDF
2378-TCDD
TCDD
2378-TCDF
TCDF
PCDD
TCDF
PCDF
TCDD
2,3,7,8 T DD
2,3,7,8 T DD
2,3,7,8 T DD
42 ng/dscm
167 ng/dscm
27 ng/dscm
137 ng/dscm
20 ng/dscm
63 ng/dscm
32 ng/dscm
172 ng/dscm
95 ng/dsem
:.ff: !;«;/•! sera
112 ng/dscm
577 ng/dscm
33 ng/dscm
155 ng/dscm
48 ng/dscm
268 ng/dscm
0.2 ng/dscm
3 .3 ng/d scm
NA
,,18 ng/d s cm
0.05 ng/dscm
1.1 ng/dscm
NA
6 ng/dscm
1.5 ng/dscm
18 ng/dscm
NA
121 ng/dscm
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
ND
ND
ND
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
stack
stack
stack
stack
ESP
Grate
Stack
PART.
PART.
PART.
PART.
FG (XAD)
FG (XAD)
FG (XAD)
FG (XAD)
PART.* FG
PART.* FG
PART.* FG
..,,RARI.+ FG
PART.* FG
PART.* FG
PART.* FG
PART.* FG
PART.* FG
PART.* FG
PART .+ FG
PART.+ FG
PART.
PART.
PART.
PART.
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG/FA
FG/FA
FG/FA
FG/FA
FA
ASH
FG
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
" MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
Train
T.: i- In
Train
Train
GS
GS
SSAS
                                     B-29
-------
JNICIPAL  SOLID WASTE
 REF  *
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG
                                          PROCESSES   SAMPLE
                                                    METHOD
116
116
116
116
116
118/1
118/1
118/1
118/1
118/1
118/2
118/2
118/2
' 118/2
118/2
.1 A3
143
143
143
143
143
143
: 43
• An
143
143
143
143
143
143
144/Bol
144/Bol
144/Bol
144/Bol
144/Bol
144/Bol
144/Bol
144/Bol
144/Bol
144/Bol
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCM»
-rDn
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
lificr?
I TCDD
OCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H7CDD
H6CDD
OCDD
TCDD/TC.DF
P5CDD/P5C
H6crr/H6r
H7.CDD/H7C
OCDD/OCDF
TCDD/TCDF
P5CDD/P5C
H6CDD/H6C
H7CDD/H7C
OCDD/OCDF
275 ng/g
7 .8 ng/g
21.8 ng/g
62.4 ng/g
185.8 ng/g
ND
8 ng/g
28 ng/g
75 ng/g
180 ng/g
ND
7 ng/g
25 ng/g
74 ng/g
i<.f. ra/e
r. 5: i c .
,-.... 4 ng/g
16 ng/g
16 ng/g
35 ng/g
40 ng/g
110 ng/g
340 ng/g
900 ng/g
900 ng/g
Trac .
6 ng/g
55 ng/g
53 ng/g
50 ng/g
112 ppb
205 ppb
'.' '•> :. r. p L
345 ppb
425 ppb
16 ppb
20 ppb
33 ppb
113 ppb
390 ppb
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP .
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
I-f'P
Furnace
Furnace
Furnace
Furnace
Furnace
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
:• :- 1-
ESP
ESP
Furnace
Furnace
Furnace
Furnace
Furnace
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
Ash
Ash
Ash
Ash
Ash
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
!•*
FA
FA
Ash
Ash
Ash
Ash
Ash
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
CS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
                                    B-30
-------
MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE
  REF t      I30MER
ISOMER CONG
                                           PROCESSES
SAMPLE
                                      METHOD
144/Flo
144/Flo
144/Flo
144/Flo
144/Flo
144/Flo
144/Flo
144/Flo
144/Flo
144/Flo
144/Mil
144/Mil
144/Mil
144/Mil
144/Mil
144/A
144/A
144/A
•' 144/A
14A/A
144/A
144/A
144/A
144/A
ILL,'*
144/A
144/A
144/A
144/A
144/A
144/A
144/A
144/A
144/A
144/A
144/A
144/B
144/B
144/B
144/B
144/B
144/B
144/B
TCDD/TCDF
P5CDD/DF
H6CDD/DF
H7CDD/DF
OCDD/OCDF
TCDD/TCDF
6P5CDD/DF
H6CDD/DF
H7CDD/DF
OCDD/OCDF
TCDD/TCDF
P5CDD/P5C
H6CDD/H6C
H7CDD/H7C
OCDD/OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
oc r>::>
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
" P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
H7CDF
. OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
H7CDF
OCDF
175 ppb
240 ppb
185 ppb
400 ppb
570 ppb
ND
ND
125 ppb
105 ppb
31 ppb
51 ppb
115 ppb
177 ppb
310 ppb
547 ppb
20 ppb
100 ppb
160 ppb
230 ppb
e * ••
70 ppb
-' ^50 ppb
16 ppb
20 ppb
•5 t •• -,'j
90 ppb
340 ppb
25 ppb
50 ppb
N/A
80 ppb
180 ppb
290 ppb
510 ppb
110 ppb
6 C ppb
ND
ND
ND
30 ppb
40 ppb
ND
ND
Stack
f • 1 1". '': ? ,
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
-, ', T.
. * * i
ESP
ESP
Furnace
Furnace
7-irnace
Furnace
Furnace
Furnace
Furnace
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
yep
£* 0 c
yep
ciD«
ESP
ESP
yep
&0C
yep
U V *
FA
FA
FA
FA
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
Ash
Ash
Ash
Ash
Ash
Ash
Ash
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA

;:/*
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
(-S
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS

                                        B-31
-------
NICIPAL SOLID WASTE
REF *
ISOMER
ISOMER CONC.
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
I6C
3fO
160
160
160
.:6f:/r:Vl:4A
168/NW1:4A
168/NW1:4A
168/NW1:4A
168/NW1:4A
168/NW1:4A
168/NW1:4A
168/NV1:£A
168/NW1:4A
168/NW1:4A
168/NW1:4A
168/NW1:4A
168/NW1:4A
168/NW1:4A
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
'. r;p?
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TOTAL
;- r;7r.-r-t:pv
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TOTAL
0.32 ng/g
ND
ND
ND
ND
1 .4 rg/t
6.2 ng/g
ND
ND
ND
170 ng/g
530 ng/g
52 ng/g
7 .4 ng/g
2.6 ng/g
•i'' -Mg/S
1800 ng/g
83 ng/g
9.5 ng/g
1.4 ng/g
5.4 ng/nm3 •
-' * 190 ng/nm3
610 ng/nm3
310 ng/nm3
120 ng/nm3
61 ng/nm3
1300 ng/nm3
27 n 3 /am 3
540 ng/nm3
650 ng/nm3
310 ng/nm3
100 ng/nm3
10 ng/nm3
1600 ng/nm3
" DUST CO.
DUST CO.
DUST CO.
DUST. CO.
DUST CO.
ItTTS' <:!?ST CO.
DUST CO.
DUST CO.
DUST CO.
DUST CO.
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK -
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
BOTTOM ASH
BOTTOM ASH
BOTTOM ASH
BOTTOM ASH
BOTTOM ASH
S'.f.-'i VOl--. ASH
BOTTOM ASH
BOTTOM ASH
BOTTOM ASH
BOTTOM ASH
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
                                     B-34
-------
MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE
  REF
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG.
                                           PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD
168/NW1:5A
166/M;' :"/>
168/NW1:5A
168/NW1:5A
168/NW1:5A
168/NW1:5A
168/NW1:5A
168/MW1:5A
168/NW1:5A
168/NW1:5A
168/NW1:5A
In.J/HiU: 5A
1 . -/I U :5A
168/NW1:5A
168/NW1:6A
168/NW1:6A
168/NW1.-6A
.168/NW1:6A
168/NW1:6A
168/NW1:6A
168/NW1:6A
168/NW1:6A
168/NW1.-6A
168/NW1:6A
168/NW1-.6A
168/NW1:6A
168/NW1:6A
168/NW1:6A
168/NW2:1A
168/NW2:1A
168/NW2:1A
168/NW2:1A
168/NW2:1A
168/NW2:1A
168/NW2:1A
168/NW2:1A
168/NW2:1A
168/NW2:1A
168/NW2:1A
168/NW2:1A
168/NW2:1A
168/NW2.-1A
2378-TCDD
vrr r.
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TOTAL
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
•-i? CDF
OCDF
TOTAL
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
(.(.];?.
TOTAL
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TOrV>J
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TOTAL
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TOTAL
4.4 ng/nm3
1 "ft n.£/nm3
440 ng/nm3
350 ng/nm3
150 ng/nm3
52 ng/nm3
1100 ng/nm3
14 ng/nm3
140 ng/nm3
402 ng/nm3
320 ng/nm3
120 ng/nm3
10 ng/nm3
1000 ng/nm3
8.3 ng/mn3
160 ng/nm3
360 ng/nm3
3000 ng/nm3
930 ng/nm3.
37 ("'•' *i;j/niii3
4700 ng/nm3
35 ng/nm3
550 ng/nm3
550 ng/nm3
3100 ng/nm3
750 ng/nm3
43 ng/nm3
SOOO n;i/niii3
12 ng/nm3
110 ng/nm3
260 ng/hm3
83 ng/nm3
30 ng/nm3
11 ng/nm3
490 ng/nm3
8.7 ng/nm3
170 ng/nm3
250 ng/nm3
83 ng/nm3
27 rj./i.r.r.
2.6 ng/nm3
550 ng/nn»3
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
'STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
• STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
:':v,,<:K
STACK
STACK
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
1 tr
FG
FG
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
. MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
''. i T T
MM5T
MM5T
                                      B-35
-------
NICIPAL SOLID WASTE
REF t
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG.
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD
168/NW2:2A
168/NW2:2A
168/NW2:2A

". f. H / N '-' ?. : 2 A

r f f. / K W 2 : 2 A

168/NW2 : 2A
168/MW2:2A
168/NW2:2A
168/NW2:2A
168/NW2:2A
,
168/NW2 : 2A

163/NW2: 2A
* <* A A
168/NW2.-2A
168/NW2:3B
168/NW2:3B
168/NW2:3B
168/NW2:3B
168/NW2:3B
168/NW2:3B
168/NW2.-3B
168/NW2:3B
168/NW2:3B
168/NW2-.3B
168/NW2:3B
168/NW2:3B
168/NW2-.3B
168/NW2:3B
168/NW1/4AB
168/NW1/4AB
168/NW1/4AB
168/NW1/4AB
168/NW1/4AB
168/NW1/4AB
168/NW1/4AB
168/NW1/4AB
168/NW1/4AB
168/NW1/4AB
168/NW1/4AB
168/NW1/4AB
168/NW1/4AB
168/NW1/4AB
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
-
i'.o Ci/w
TT T /^ T\ T\
H7CDD
/\ f* T\ n
OCDD
TOTAL
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
Tt f f+T* U»
HoCDF
TT "T /I T\ 19
H7CDF
/* f T> "C1
CCDF
TOTAL
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TOTAL
2378-TCDF --
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TOTAL
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TOTAL
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CEF
OCDF
TOTAL
6.8 ng/nm3
220 ng/nm3
610 ng/nm3







18 ng/nm3
430 ng/nm3
470 ng/nm3






4.3 ng/nm3
100 ng/nm3
350 ng/nm3
340 ng/nm3
170 ng/nm3
74 ng/nm3
1000 ng/nm3
,14 ng/nm3
272 ng/nm3
390 ng/nm3
280 ng/nisi3
86 ng/nm3
11 ng/nm3
1000 ng/nm3
6.6 ng/g
340 ng/g
640 ng/g
660 ng/g
170 ng/g
42 ng/g
1900 ng/g
13 ng/g
330 ng/g
370 ng/g
500 ng/g
nr. nt/c
6.2 ng/g
1300 ng/g
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
tj X A w^
STACK
w X n v n
STACK
w A.  «» V
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK.
STACK
STACK
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
!•::';?
ESP
ESP
FG
FG
FG
FG
J. >*
FG

FG

FG
FG
FG
FG
FG

FG

FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FT;
r<;
FG
FG
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
. ' A.
FA
FA
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T

MM5T

MM5TS

MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T

MM5T

MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
'. .'i
I']' ~,">
MM5T
MM5T
GS
GS
GS
f* ft
GS
f* 0
GS
GS
/* ft
GS
GS
GS
GS
IS
1 • -.-
GS
GS
                                    B-36
-------
MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE
  &EF *
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD
168/NW1/5:!
168/NW1/5:!
168/NW1/5:!
168/NW1/5:!
168/NW1/5:!
168/NV3/5:!
168/NW1/5:!
168/NW1/5:!
168/NW1/5:!
168/NW1/5:!
168/NW1/5:!
168/NW1/5:!
168/NW1/5;!
If. ft/ "'-'1/5:1
J68/NWl/5:2
168/NWl/5:2
168/NWl/5:2
168/NWl/5:2
168/NWl/5:2.
l'68/NWl/5:2
168/NWl/5:2
168/NWl/5:2
168/NWl/5:2
168/NWl/5:2
168/NWl/5:2
168/NWl/5:2
168/NWl/5:2
168/NWl/5:2
168/NW1/6AB
168/NW1/6AB
168/NW1/6AB
168/NW1/6AB
168/NW1/6AB
168/NW1/6AB
168/NW1/6AB
168/NW1/6AB
168/NW1/6AB
168/NW1/6AB
168/NW1/6AB
168/NW1/6AB
168/NW1/6AB
168/NW1/6AB
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
CC.T.T.
TOTAL
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TOTAL
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TOTAL
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TOTAL
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TOTAL
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TOTAL
5.9 ng/g
330 ng/g
730 ng/g
1000 ng/g
240 ng/g
*-S r-L/C
2300 ng/g
11 ng/g
300 ng/g
430 ng/g
920 ng/g
210 ng/g
11 ng/g
1900 ng/g
6 .4 ng/g
410 ng/g
800 ng/g
510 ng/g
120 ng/g
28 ng/g
1900 ng/g
11 ng/g
**350 ng/g
520 ng/g
570 ns/s
110 ng/g,
6.8 ng/g
1200 ng/g
3.9 ng/g
290 ng/g
450 ng/g
750 ng/g
290 ng/g
49 ng/g
1800 ng/g
6.8 ng/g
210 ng/S
270 ng/g
900 ng/g
170 ng/g
7.7 ng/g
1600 ng/g
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
i:SP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
S3?
if.r
" ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
KSr>
ESI
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA "
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
.* i*.
I-"**.
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
"* i"1.
?A
FA
FA
FA
FA
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
G3
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
• - i*»
* •'.',
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
' f.'
' ! '
GS
GS
GS
GS
                                      B-37
-------
NICIPAL SOLID  WASTE
REF * ISOMER
68/NW2/1:!
6K/NW2/1:!
: n »/;•:'/:•/' :1
L68/HV2/1:!
L68/NW2/1:!
68/NW2/1:!
168/NW2/1:!
L68/NW2/1:!
168/NW2/1:!
168/NW2/1:!
168/NW2/1:!
168/NW2/1:!
168/NW2/1:!
6f./i:y;:/i : 1
68/NW2/l:2A
168/NW2/1:2A
168/NW2/1:2A
168/NW2/1.-2A
168/NW2/1:2A
168/NW2/1:2A
168/NW2/1:2A
168/NW2/1:2A
168/NW2/1:2A
168/NW2/1:2A
168/NW2/1:2A
168/NW2/1-.2A
168/NW2/1:2A
168/NW2/1:2A
168/NW2/1:2B
168/NW2/1:2B
168/NW2/1:2B
168/NW2/1:2B
168/NW2/1:2B
168/NW2/1:2B
168/NW2/1:2B
168/NW2/1:2B
168/NW2/1:2B
168/NW2/1:2B
168/NW2/1:2B
168/NW2/1:2B
168/NW2/1:2B
168/NW2/l:n;
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TOTAL
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TOTAL
2378-TGDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TOTAL
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
f Tcr.K
OCDF
TOTAL
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TOTAL
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
-C^AL
ISOMER CONG. PROCESSES SAMPLE METHOD
6.0 ng/g
270 ng/g
660 ng/g
350 ng/g
110 ng/g
31 ng/g
1400 ng/g
0.11 ng/g
280 ng/g
410 ng/g
350 ng/g
100 ng/g
6.2 ng/g
1100 ng/g
4.0 ng/g
160 ng/g
330 ng/g
790 ng/g
230 ng/g
55 ng/g
1600 ng/g
7.11 ng/g
170 ng/g
"- * ' 240 ng/g
640 ng/g
1 7 C< -. >r I >f
1 • u • w
8.6 ng/g
1200 ng/g
4.9 ng/g
230 ng/g
450 ng/g
-
-
-
-
8.1 ng/g
200 ng/g
220 ng/g
-
—
-.
—
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
. ESP .
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
V:'?
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
-. r- ».»
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
7A
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
7 A
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
V»7 .*J
168/NW2/2AB    2378-TCDD
3.7 ng/g
ESP
FA
                                                                       GS
                                      B-33
-------
MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE
  REF *
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
                                     METHOD
168/NW2/2AB
168/NW2/2AB
168/NW2/2AB
168/NW2/2AB
168/NW2/2AB
168/NW2/2AB
168/NW2/2AB
168/NW2/2AB
168/NW2/2AB
1v:«/VV2/2A3
Hf./i:f;:/2AB
168/NW2/2AB
168/NW2/2AB
168/NW2/3AB
168/NW2/3AB
168/NW2/3AB
168/NW2/3AB
168/NW2/3AB
168/NW2/3AB
168/NW2/3AB
168/NW2/3AB
168/NW2/3AB
\>> r-/\rV2/3AB
UO/H2/3AB
168/NW2/3AB
168/NW2/3AB
168/NW2/3AB
168/EC1/7:!
168/EC1/7:!
168/EC1/7:!
168/101/7:1
168/EC1/7:!
ifw./.-r:!,/? : 1
i(.i/ECl/7:l
168/EC1/7:!
168/EC1/7:!
168/EC1/7:!
168/EC1/7:!
168/EC1/7:!
168/EC1/7:!
168/EC1/7:!
1fift/T?f!1 /7 -7
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TOTAL
2378-TCDF
TCDP
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TOTAL
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TOTAL
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TOTAL
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TOTAL
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TOTAL .
7^7«— rrnn
160 ng/g
380 ng/g
390 ng/g
95 ng/g
20 ng/g
1000 ng/g
6.3 ng/g
170 ng/g
260 ng/g
390 ng/g
72 ng/g
1.8 ng/g
900 ng/g
_
—
—
420 ng/g
100 ng/g
24 ng/g

—
-
•*
490 ng/g
110 ng/g
5.3 ng/g
—
3.5 ng/g
210 ng/g
730 ng/g
530 ng/g
270 ng/g
170 ng/g
1900 ng/g
6.4 ng/g
180 ng/g
270 ng/g
330 ng/g
160 ng/g
24 ng/g
960 ng/g
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
•RGB
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
£'A
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
.FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
•a A
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
no
                                       B-39
-------
JNICIPAL SOLID  WASTE
REF * ISOMER ISOMER CONG.
168/ECl/7:2
168/ECl/7:2
168/EC177 :?
168/ECl/7:2
168/EC1/7.-2
168/ECl/7:2
168/ECl/7:2
168/ECl/7:2
168/ECl/7:2
168/ECl/7:2
168/ECl/7:2
168/ECl/7:2
168/ECl/7:2
168/EC2/8:!
168/EC2/8:!
168/EC2/8:!
168/EC2/8:!
168/EC2/8:!
168/EC2/8:!
168/EC2/8:!
168/EC2/8:!
168/EC2/8:!
168/EC2/8:!
168/EC2/8:!
168/EC2/8:!
168/EC2/8:!
168/EC2/8:!
168/EC2/8:2
168/EC2/8:2
168/EC2/8:2
168/EC2/8:2
168/EC2/8;2
168/EC2/8:2
168/EC2/8:2
168/EC2/8:2
168/EC2/8:2
168/EC2/8:2
168/EC2/8:2
168/EC2/8:2
168/EC2/8:2
168/1 c:-.T :f:
168/EC2/8:3A
168/EC2/8:3A
TCDD
P5CDD
} f.rr-r
H7CDD
OCDD
TOTAL
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TOTAL
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TOTAL
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF ' " ' *
H7CDF
OCDF
TOTAL
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TOTAL
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
' n~/,L
2378-TCDD
TCDD



f-fC rg/g
270 ng/g
140 ng/g







350 ng/g
150 ng/g
19 ng/g

.60 ng/g
46 ng/g
230 ng/g
150 ng/g
133 ng/g
190 ng/g
750 ng/g
1.4 ng/g
34 ng/g
64 ng/g
" 71 ng/g
76 ng/g
23 ng/g
270 ng/g
.62 ng/g
44 ng/g
210 ns/3
170 ng/g
140 ng/g
190 ng/g
750 ng/g
1.5 ng/g
39 ng/g
81 ng/g
73 ng/g
98 ng/g
23 ng/g
3 10 nS/g
.48 ng/g
35 ng/g
PROCESSES
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
KSP
i:fi?
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
'•',:•» :j
F£J'
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ZSP
ESP
ESP
SAMPLE
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA '
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
'• t*.
}-'i\
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
METHOD
68
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
' GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
c;s
(-S
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
•;:•;
< -::
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
                                        B-40
-------
MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE
  REF *
ISOMER
                            ISOMER  CONG
                             PROCESSES    SAMPLE
METHOD
168/EC2/8:3A
168/EC2/8:3A
168/EC2/8:3A
168/EC2/8:3A
168/EC2/8:3A
168/EC2/8:3A
168/EC2/8:3A
168/EC2/8:3A
168/EC2/8:3A
168/1 C2/T. ISA
168/EC2/8:3A
168/EC2/8:3A
168/EC2/8:3B
168/EC2/8:3B
168/EC2/8:3B

168/EC2/8:3B

168/EC2/8 :3B
. _ m -fc — _
168/EC2/8:3B

168/EC2/8:3B
168/EC2/8:3B
168/EC2/8:3B
168/EC2/8:3B
168/EC2/8:3B
168/EC2/8:3B
168/EC2/8:3B
• f Mi M «
168/EC2/8:3B
168/EC1/7:!
168/EC1/7:!
168/EC1/7:!
Jr. '»//:<: 1/7: 1
HI. /I C J /7 : 1
168/EC1/7:!
168/EC1/7:!
168/EC1/7:!
168/EC1/7:!
168/EC1/7:!
168/EC1/7:!
168/EC1/7:!
168/EC1/7:!
168/EC1/7:!
!68/ECl/7:2
168/EC1/7 :2
1 6 *3 /KG 1/7: :•
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TOTAL
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
jf7r.j)F
OCDF
TOTAL
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
TT £ /^ T\T%
H6CDD
U T /%T>7\
H7CDD
/\/i T\n
OCDD
1*1 f\f1* A T
TOTAL
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
f\ n 
-------
NICIPAL  SOLID WASTE
REF * ISOMER ISOMER
68/ECl/7:2
68/ECl/7:2
68/ECl/7:2
68/ECl/7:2
68/ECl/7:2
68/ECl/7:2
68/ECl/7:2
68/ECl/7:2
68/EC1/7.-2
L68/ECl/7:2
L68/ECl/7:2
168/EC2/8:!
L68/EC2/8:!
L68/EC2/8.-1
68/EC2/8:!
68/EC2/8:!
L68/EC2/8:!
L68/EC2/8:!
.68/EC2/8:!
68/EC2/8:!
fi«/sr,2/8: 1
h:.;/rc ;•/£•.: l
L68/EC2/8:!
68/EC2/8:!
68/EC2/8:!
l68/EC2/8:2
168/EC2/8:2
168/EC2/8:2
168/EC2/8:2
168/EC2/8:2
168/EC2/8:2
168/EC2/8:2
168/EC2/8::
168/EC2/8s2
168/EC2/8:2
168/EC2/8:2
168/EC2/8:2
168/EC2/8:2
168/EC2/8:2
168/EC2/8:3
168/EC2/8:3
168/EC2/8:3
1 £ Q /TTr 9 / fl . ^
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TOTAL
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TOTAL
237B-Tfirir<
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TOTAL
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
F6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TOTAL
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TOTAL
i '7f.-' i .:•:•
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TOTAL
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
n An Tin



CONG.



.32 ng/g
7.6 ng/g
11 ng/g


.14
.67


.041
.55
.24


.016
.20
1.2


. '~> ">. 9
,70
.82


.031
.16
.70


ng/g
ng/g


ng/g
ng/g
ng/g


ng/g
ng/g
ng/g


^S/S
ng/g
ng/g


ng/g
ng/g
ng/g
PROCESSES
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
i (,'! :-c,i\
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM,
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
wnTTnM
SAMPLE
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
/•SI-
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
METHOD
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
(S
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
cs
                                      B-42
-------
MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE
  REP
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD
168/EC2/8:3
168/EC2/8:3
168/EC2/8.-3
168/EC2/8:3
l68/EC2/8:3
168/EC2/8:3
168/EC2/8:3
168/EC2/8:3
168/EC2/8:3
168/EC2/8:3
17 4 /A
174/A
174/A
174/*
174/A
174/A
174/A
174/A
174/A
174/A
174/B
174/B
174/B
174/B
174/B
174/B
174/B
174/B
174/B
174/B
178/Alk
178/Alk
178/Alk
178/Alk
178/Alk
178/Alk
178/Ams
178/Ams
178/Ams
178/Ams
178/Ams
178/Ams
' H7CDD
OCDD
TOTAL
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
I. ~ Si t»T»
t / 1 • 1 « I'
OCDF
TOTAL
I:CM/
P5CDD
H6CDD
i Tc.r-r.
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
H6CDD
OCDD
TCDF
H6CDF
OCDF
TCDD
H6CDD
OCDD
TCDF
H6CDF
OCDF




.041 ng/g
.38 ng/g
.76 ng/g


	



538 ng/m3
727 ng/m3
1197 ng/m3
U'7 EO/Bl?
346 ng/m3
3419 ng/m3
1385 ng/m3
1583 ng/m3
1395 ng/m3
151 ng/m3
.. ,2.25 ng/m3
1.7 ng/m3
3 . /•"• ng/u.7
26.2 ng/m3
14.2 ng/m3
20.7 ng/m3
8.8 ng/m3
14.9 ng/m3
58.2 ng/m3
7.3 ng/m3
113.8 ppb
435.2 ppb
96.4 ppb
220.1 ppb
421.2 ppb
18 ppb
14.1 ppb
152.2 ppb
401 ppb
61.3 ppb
128.3 ppb
28 ppb
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
'• - ---. c "..
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack


ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
SSP
r.fip
ESP
ESP
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
F6
F6
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
* / ^ ',
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG


FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
- MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
1-1-51
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T


GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
<4S
GS
GS
                                      B-43
-------
UNICIPAL SOLID WASTE
 REF *
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD
178/Arn
178/Arn
178/Arn
178/Arn
178/Arn
178/Arn
178/Lee
178/Lee
178/Lee
178/Lee
178/Lee
178/Lee
178/Lei
178/Lei
178/Lei
178/Lei
178/Lei
178/Lei
178/Rij
178/Rij
178/Rij
178/Rij
178/Rij
17P/RLJ
.'7 ft/Boo
178/Roo
178/Roo
178/Roo
178/Roo
178/Roo
178/Rot
178/Rot
178/Rot
178/Rot
178/Rot
178/Rot
TCDD
F6CDD
OCDD
TCDF
H6CDF
OCDF
TCDD
H6CDD
OCDD
TCDF
H6CDF
OCDF
TCDD
H6CDD
OCDD
TCDF
H6CDF
OCDF
TCDD
H6CDD
OCDD
TCDF
H6CDF
OCD7
TCDD
H6CDD
OCDD
TCDF
H6CDF
OCDF
TCDD
H6CDD
OCDD
TCDF
K6Gr.F
OCDF
24 ppb
136 ppb
51 ppb
91 ppb
82 ppb
11 ppb
226 ppb
560 ppb
110 ppb
240 ppb
280 ppb
10 ppb
212 pub
910 ppt'
550 ppb
220 ppb
530 ppb
110 ppb
ND
10 ppb
"" "10 ppb
50 ppb
60 ppb
10 ppb
40 ppb
330 ppb
190 ppb
110 ppb
150 ppb
40 ppb
18 ppb
140 ppb
190 ppb
70 ppb
70 prb
20 ppb
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
'•is?'
! f;J'
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
I-.EP
ESP
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
"JA
]•*»
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
i - s
(-!•:
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
/"* C*
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
f* O
GS
Go
•s
GS
                                     B-44
-------
MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE
  RBF *
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
                                                                 METHOD
178/Zaa
178/Zaa
178/Zaa
178/Zaa
178/Zaa
178/Zaa
178/Zaa
178/Zaa
178/Zaa
178/Zaa
178/Zaa
178/Zaa
178/Zaa
178/Zaa
178/Zaa
178/Zaa
178/Zaa
178/Zaa
178/Zaa
178/Zaa
178/Pan
178/Zaa
178/Zaa
178/Zaa
178/Zaa
178/Zaa
181
181
181
181
181
181
181
181
181
181
181
181
181
181
181
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
F6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
rr.i.tf
H6CDD
OCDD
TCDF
H6CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
secrr
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
57.1 ng/Nm3
132.1 ng/Nm3
439.8 ng/Nm3
177 ng/Nm3
451.7 ng/Nm3
161.1 ng/Nm3
155.2 ng/Nm3
"2? .£ ne/Nm3
204.2 ng/Nm3
67.6 ng/Nm3
88.8 ppb
. 433.8 ppb
" 1576 .3 ppb
1701.5 ppb
1372.6 ppb
182.7 ppb
399.1 ppb
863.1 ppb
541.5 ppb
94.2 ppb
Kf,5 ppb
730.9 ppb
358.7 ppb
.- ,2H PPb
590 ppb
60.13 ppb
760 ng/m3
714 ng/m3
fi«h nji/ra.'1.
298 ng/m3
229 ng/m3
3.65 ng/g
6.42 ng/g
f-.12 ng/g
2.28 ng/g
1.52 ng/g
11.85 ng/g
17.2 ng/g
14.3 ng/g
2.9 ng/g
0.5 ng/g
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
ESP
ESP
FSF
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
Stack
Stack
S c =. c '••
Stack
Stack
ESP
ESP
F.f;p
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FA
FA
F4
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FG
FG
VI 1
FG
FG
FA
FA
F.A
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
Train
Train
Train
Train
Train
Train
Train
Train
Train
Train
Cont . S
Cont . S
('ont . S
Ccr-f - S
Cont . S
Cont . S
Cont . S
Cont . S
Cont . S
Cont . S
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
MM5T
MM5T
IT:::
MM5T
MM5T
GS
GS
(.-S
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
                                     B-45
-------
NICIPAL SOLID WASTE
REF
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG.   PROCESSES    SAMPLE
METHOD
196
196
196
196
196
196
196
196
196
202
202
202
202
-. - -, / •:
203/1
203/1
203/1
203/1
203/2
203/2
203/2
203/2
203/2
203/3
203/3
203/3
res/?.
2C3/3
203/4
203/4
203/4
203/4
203/4
203/5
203/5
203/5
203/5
203/5
2378-TCDD
TCDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OGDD
TCDP
H6CDF
H7CDP
OCDF
PCDD
PCDF
TCDD
TCDF
• cl-.I;
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
J.7i'"0
OCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
0.41 ng/dscm
6 .3 ng/dscm
16 ng/dscm
7.6 ng/dscm
2.5 ng/dscm
90 ng/dscm
62 ng/dscm
7.5 ng/dscm
0.6 ng/dscm
236.5 ng/g
517.3 ng/g
20.6 ng/g
45.7 r-L/L
£5 ng/g
213 ng/g
354 ng/g
184 ng/g
97. ng/g
<0.5 ng/g
" ' <0.5 ng/g
<0.5 ng/g
<0.5 ng/g
<0.5 ng/g
2.7 ng/g
6.6 ng/g
11.6 ng/g
r>.7 -13 /S
3.5 ng/g
12.9 ng/g
37.5 ng/g
75.6 ng/g
41.9 ng/g
35.2 ng/g
2.4 ng/g
7.9 ng/g
9.7 ng/g
9.1 ng/g
2.1 ng/g
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
5TAO'.
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
Stack
Stack
Stack
r.*£ck
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
FG
FG
FG
FG
X • -
FG
FG
FG
FG
FA
FA
FA
TA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
' FA
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
i .1
vt r>T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
N/A
__ • .
N/A
__ » .
N/A
._ i .
N/A
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
                                     B-46
-------
MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE
  EEF *
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD
203/1
203/1
203/1
-.-•vi
' 1 . •'
• ' 1 •
203/2
203/2
203/2
203/2
203/2
203/3
203/3
203/3
203/3
203/3
203/4
203/4
'• 203/4
203 IL
203/4
203/5
203/5
203/5
203/5
203/5
205/1
205/1
205/1
205/1
205/1
205/1
205/1
205/1
205/1
205/1
205/1
205/1
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
V7CT
OCCF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
I- 7 (•:••>-•
OCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
2378-TCDD
T4CDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
237&-TCM
T4CDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
209 ng/g
549 ng/g
1082 ng/g
499 ng/g
24 ng/g
<0.5 ng/g
<0.5 ng/g
<0.5 ng/g
<0.5 ng/g
<0.5 ng/g
7oO ng/g
17.8 ng/g
32.1 ng/g
10.9 ng/g
0.7 ng/g
8.2 ng/g
19.8 ng/g
38.7 ng/g
" f) . 6 11 g / g
4.0 ng/g
4.4 ng/g
21 .0 ng/g
21.6 ng/g
16.6 ng/g
<0.5 ng/g
39 ng/s3
1243 ng/m3
3048 ng/m3
3474 ng/m3
3122 ng/m3
799 ng/m3
r->c<7 ng/m3
3205 ng/m3
4817 ng/m3
4129 ng/m3
2693 ng/n3
218 ng/m3
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA ,
FA
FA
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MK5T
MM5T
                                      B-47
-------
UNICIPAL SOLID WASTE
 REF *
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG
PROCESSES    SAMPLE
         METHOD
205/2
205/2
205/2
:•• f - 5 / '
ZC5/2
205/2
205/2
205/2
205/2
205/2
205/2
205/2
205/3
205/3
205/3
205/3
205/3
205/3
205/3
205/3
205/3
205/3
• '-.<•< ?/3
••<•:-/:>
2378-TCDD
T4CDD
P5CDD
K6CZO
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDF
T4CDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
2378-TCDD
T4cm>
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDF
T4CDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
CCEF
6 ng/m3
234 ng/m3
440 ng/m3
;>43 ng/m3
426 ng/m3
106 ng/m3
114 ng/m3
916 ng/m3
1024 ng/n»3
864 ng/m3
465 ng/m3
30 ng/m3
14 ng/m3
4? 7 r.£/r 3
1045 ng/m3
1324 ng/m3
1272 ng/m3
325 ng/m3
232 ng/m3
1640 ng/m3
-- 1889 ng/m3
1665 ng/m3
1145 ng/m3
81 ng/m3
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
SI/CK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
. FG
FG
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
      221
  PCDD/PCDF
 N/A A
   Stack
FA/FG
N/A
222/3
222/3
222/3
222/3
222/3
222/3
222/3
222/3
222/3
222/3
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
Cd'F
                            474 ng/g
                            349 ng/g
                            615 ng/g
                            370 ng/g
                            162 ng/g
                            419 ng/g
                            207 ng/g
                            263 ng/g
                            287 ng/g
                                  ESP
                                  ESP
                                  ESP
                                  ESP
                                  ESP
                                  ESP
                                  ESP
                                  ESP
                                  ESP
                               ASH
                               ASH
                               ASH
                               ASH
                               ASH
                               ASH
                               ASH
                               ASH
                               ASH
                         GS
                         GS
                         GS
                         GS
                         GS
                         GS
                         GS
                         GS
                         GS
                         GS
                                     B-48
-------
MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE
  REF #
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG.   PROCESSES    SAMPLE
METHOD
225/1:1
225/1:1
225/1: 1
ff m* J f * • •
225/1:1
225/1:1
225/1:1
225/1:2
225/1 :2
225/1:2
225/1:2
225/1:2
225/1:2
225/2:1:1
225/2:1:1
225/2:1:1
225/2:1:1
225/2:1:1
•• 225/2:1:1
225/2:1:2
225/2:1:2
225/2:1:2
225/2:1:2
225/2:1:2
225/2:L:2
225/2:2:1
225/2:2:1
225/2:2:1
225/2:2:1
225/2:2:1
225/2:2:1
225/2:2:2
225/2:2:2
225/2:2:2
225/2:2:2
225/2:2:2
225/2:2:2
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
28.2 ppb
159.14 ppb
323.11 ppb
161.84 ppb
293.26 ppb
184.45 ppb
3.2 ppb
25.45 ppb
50.42 ppb
. 72.94 ppb
72.04 ppb
72.17 ppb
16.7 ppb
243.28 ppb
586.79 ppb
606.69 ppb
330.04 ppb
149.31 ppb
23 ppb
--360.62 ppb
718.51 ppb
813.1 ppb
434.37 ppb
208.69 ppb
3.4 ppb
20.33 ppb
43.53 ppb
48.54 ppb
71.67 ppb
58.39 ppb
4.4 ppb
18.17 ppb
48.49 ppb
65.1 ppb
88.33 ppb
53.76 ppb
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
ft 0
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
f* O
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
        228
    TCDD
                             19.1 ng/sample    Stack
                                             FA
                                                                    SSAS
                                       B-49
-------
INICIPAL SOLID WASTE
REF  *
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG.   PROCESSES   SAMPLE
                                                                 METHOD
     243
     243
     243
   PCDF
   PCDF
   PCDF
                   ESP
                  Hopper
                  Stack
FA
FA
FG
GS
GS
M5T
                                     B-50
-------
FOSSIL FUEL COMBUSTION
 REF f
   ISOMER
 ISOMER CONC.  PROCESSES
           SAMPLE
         METHOD
  5/1
  5/1

  5/2
  5/2

  5/3
  5/3

 5/11
 5/11

 5/12
 5/12

 5/13
 5/13

  59

62/OIL
62/OIL
62/OIL
62/OIL
62/OIL
 62/NG
 62/NG
 62/NG
 62/NG
 62/NG
 2378-TCDD
 2378-TCDF

 2378-TCDD
 2378-TCDF

 2378-TCDD
 2378-TCDF

 2378-TCDD
 2378-TCDF

 2378-TCDD
 2378-TCDF

 2378-TCDD
 2378-TCDF

    TCDD

2,3,7,8 TCDD
   H6CDD  .  .
   H7CDD
    TCDD
    OCDD
2,3,7,8 TCDD
   H6CDD
   H7CDD
    TCDD
    OCDD
 <.0079 ug/m3    STACK
 <.0013 ug/m3    STACK

 <.0053 ug/m3    STACK
<.00084 ug/m3    STACK

 <.0042 ug/m3    STACK
<.00067 ug/m3    STACK-

 <.0054 ug/m3    STACK
<.00086 ug/m3    STACK

 <.0068 ug/m3    STACK
 <.0011 ug/m3    STACK

 <.0068 ug/m3    STACK
 <.0011 ug/m3    STACK

      ND          N/A

      ND         Stack
    2 ppb        Stack
    4 ppb        Stack
    38 ppb       Stack
    24 ppb       Stack
   0.6 ppb        ESP .
   1.0 ppb        ESP
    34 ppb        ESP
   430 ppb        ESP
   1300 ppb       ESP
             FG
             FG

             FG
             FG

             FG
             FG

             FG
             FG

             FG
             FG

             FG
             FG

             FA

             FA
             FA
             FA
             FA
             FA
             FA
             FA
             FA
             FA
             FA
          TRAIN
          TRAIN

          TRAIN
          TRAIN

          TRAIN
          TRAIN

          TRAIN
          TRAIN

          TRAIN
          TRAIN

          TRAIN
          TRAIN

           GS

           GS
           GS
           GS  .
           GS
           GS
           GS
           GS
           GS
           GS
           GS
  94
  94
  94
  94
  94
  94
  94
  94
  94
  94
  94
  94
  94
    TCDD
   P5CDD
   H6CDD
   H7CDD
    OCDD
    TCDF
   P5CDF
   H6CDF
   H7CDF
    OCDF
    TCDD
   P5CDD
   H6CDD
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
      ND
 Feed
 Feed
 Feed
 Feed
 Feed
 Feed
 Feed
 Feed
 Feed
 Feed
Stack
Stack
Stack
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FG.
FG
FG
 GS
 GS
 GS
 GS
 GS
 GS
 GS
 GS
 GS
 GS
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
                                B-51
-------
FOSSIL FUEL COMBUSTION
 REF f

  94
  94
  94
  94
  94
  94
  94
  94
  94
  94
  94
  94
  94
  94
  94
  94
  94

  97

  125
 ISOMER
========
 H7CDD
  OCDD
  TCDF
 P5CDF
 H6CDF
 H7CDF
  OCDF
  TCDD
 P5CDD
 H6CDD
 H7CDD  -
  OCDD
  TCDF
 P5CDF
 H6CDF
 H7CDF
  OCDF

  TCDD

  TCDD
ISOMER CONC.
     ND
     ND
     ND
     ND
     ND
     ND
     ND
     ND
     ND
     ND
     ND
     ND
     ND
     ND
     ND
     ND
     ND

     ND

     ND
UDCESSEJ
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
ESP
N/A
Stack
3 SAMPLE
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
METHOD
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS

  GS

  GS
                                 B-52
-------
SEWAGE SLUDGE INCINERATORS
REF *
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG,
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD

 24
 24
 24
 24
 24
 24
 24
 PCDD
 PCDD
 PCDD
 PCDD
 PCDD
 PCDD
 PCDD
   10 ng/g
   2 ng/g
   Traces
   Traces
   0 ng/g
   0 ng/g
   0 ng/g
  	    Sludge-Aerobic    N/A
  	    Sludge-Aerobic    N/A
  	   Sludge-anaerobic   N/A
  	   Casting-Aerobic    N/A
  	   Cast.-Anaerobic    N/A
  	        ASHES        •  -
  Stack        FUMES          GS
 235
 235
 PCDD	
 PCDF
 0.739 ug/m3     Stack
 1.213 ug/m3     Stack
                N/A
                N/A
              N/A
              N/A
                                 B-53
-------
WOOD COMBUSTION
 REF f
ISOMER
ISOMER CONC.   PROCESSES   SAMPLE
6/A
6/A
6/A
6/A
6/A
6/B
6/B
6/B
6/B
6/B
7
. 7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
54/1
54/1
54/2
54/2
54/3
54/3
54/5
54/5
54/6
54/6
54/7
54/7
62/A
62/A
62/A
62/A
62/A
62/B
62/B
62/B
62/B
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
T4CDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
- OCDF
2378-TCDD-
TCDD
2378-TCDD
TCDD
2378-TCDD
TCDD
2378-TCDD
TCDD
2378-TCDD
TCDD
2378-TCDD
TCDD
2,3,7,8 TCDD
TCDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
69.86 ug/g FEED
34.72 ug/g FEED
3.92 ug/g FEED
1.72 ug/g FEED
1.32 ug/g FEED
52.5 ug/g FEED
97.8 ug/g FEED
154.4 ug/g FEED
4i.5 ug/g FEED
ND
1.4 mg/kg feed
<0.5 mg/kg feed
ND
<0.39 mg/kg feed
ND
2.72 mg/kg feed
2.85 mg/kg feed
1.56 mg/kg feed
0.89 mg/kg feed
ND
ND
1.6 ppt
ND
7.4 ppt
130 ppt
1505 ppt
106 ppt
2513 ppt
1.3 ppt
68.8 ppt
160 ppt
7824 ppt
0.1 ppb
0.37 ppb
3.4 ppb
16 ppb
.25 ppb
ND
0.23 ppb
0.67 ppb
0.89 ppb
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
OPEN FIRE
OPEN FIRE
OPEN FIRE
OPEN FIRE
OPEN FIRE
OPEN FIRE
OPEN FIRE
OPEN FIRE
OPEN FIR'E
OPEN FIRE
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
SMOKE
SMOKE
SMOKE
SMOKE
SMOKE
SMOKE
SMOKE
SMOKE
SMOKE
SMOKE
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
METHOD

 N/A
 N/A
 N/A

 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A

FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER

  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
                                                               SCRAPING
                                                               SCRAPING
                                                               SCRAPING
                                                               SCRAPING
                                                               SCRAPING
                                                               SCRAPING
                                                               SCRAPING
                                                               SCRAPING
                                                               SCRAPING
                                 B-54
-------
WOOD COMBUSTION
 REP *
 165/1
 165/1
 165/1
 165/1

 165/2
 165/2
 165/2
 165/2

 165/3
 165/3
 165/3
 165/3

 165/5
 165/5
 165/5
 165/5

 165/6
 165/6
 165/6
 165/6

 165/7
 165/7
 165/7
 165/7

165/10
165/10
165/10
165/10
165/10

165/11
165/11
165/11
165/11
165/11

165/12
165/12
165/12
 ISOMER
ISOMER CONG,
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD

  TCDD
  H6CDD
  H7CDD
  OCDD

  TCDD
  H6CDD
  H7CDD
  OCDD

  TCDD
  H6CDD
  H7CDD
  OCDD

  TCDD
  H6CDD
  H7CDD
  OCDD

  TCDD
  H6CDD  .
  H7CDD
  OCDD

  TCDD
  H6CDD
  H7CDD
  OCDD

2378-TCDD
  TCDD
  H6CDD
  H7CDD
  OCDD

2378-TCDD
  TCDD
  H6CDD
  H7CDD
  OCDD

2378-TCDD
'  TCDD
  H6CDD
1.6 ppt
21.1 ppt
63 ppt
95 ppt
7.4 ppt
32.2 ppt
65 ppt
110 ppt
1505 ppt
2400 ppt
5400 ppt
7200 ppt
2513.6 ppt
4930 ppt
2700 ppt
1200 ppt
68.8 ppt
116 ppt
194 ppt
190 ppt
7824 ppt
5600 ppt
4200 ppt
3400 ppt
8.0 ppt
169 ppt
1251 ppt
2500 ppt
2400 ppt
9.2 ppt
146.5 ppt
7040 ppt
1800 ppt
1200 ppt
18 ppt
220.8 ppt
4344 ppt
==============
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
                                B-55
-------
WOOD COMBUSTION
REF f
165/12
165/12
165/14
165/14
165/14
165/14
165/14
165/17
165/17
165/17
165/17
165/17
165/18
165/18
165/18
165/18
165/18
165/4
165/4
165/4
165/4
165/4
165/56
165/56
165/56
165/56
165/56
165/64
165/64
165/64
165/64
165/64
165/81
165/81
165/81
165/81
165/81
ISOMER
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDD
TCDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDD
TCDD -
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDD
TCDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDD
TCDD - ,
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDD
TCDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDD
TCDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDD
TCDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
ISOMER CONC.
5800 ppt
5200 ppt
20 ppt
471.2 ppt
9220 ppt
4100 ppt
490 ppt
6.4 ppt
93.3 ppt
1982 ppt
960 ppt
870 ppt
18 ppt
513.9 ppt
1800 ppt
4300 ppt
3200 ppt
20 ppt
572.9 ppt
2700 ppt
11500 ppt
15400 ppt
110 ppt
20 ppt
17400 ppt
25000 ppt
37000 ppt
200 ppt
3147 ppt
65300 ppt
39000 ppt
30000 ppt
0.8 ppt
5 ppt
6.3 ppt
26 ppt
32 ppt
PROCESSES
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
SAMPLE
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
METHOD
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
165/87
2378-TCDD
ND
CHIMNEY
ASH
GS
                                 B-56
-------
WOOD COMBUSTION
 REF ft
ISOMER
165/87
165/87
165/87
165/87
165/97
165/97
165/97
165/97
165/97
TCDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
-23 7 8 -TCDD
TCDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
,167
167
167
167
167
167
167
167
167
167
167
167
167
179/1
179/r
179/1
179/1
179/1
179/1
179/1
179/1
179/1
179/1
179/2
179/2
179/2
179/2
179/2
179/2
179/2
TCDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2,3,7,8 TCDD
TCDD
H6CDD -
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD .
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
 ISOMER CONC.
: = = ==== = = = = = :
      ND
    3.2 ppt
  12.5 ppt
    24 ppt

      NA
      NA
  48.4 ppt
    80 ppt
    110 ppt
                                ND
                                ND
                              18 ppt
                              92 ppt
                              170 ppt
                              260 ppt
                              330 ppt
                              210 ppt
                              26 ppt
                              777 ppt
                             3100 ppt
                             7200 ppt
                             10600  ppt

                              29 ppb
                              44 ppb
                              55 ppb
                              20 ppb
                              29 ppb

                              105 ppb
                              66 ppb
                              26 ppb
                              12 ppb
                               8 ppb

                              47 ppb
                              61 ppb
                              115 ppb
                              43 ppb
                              58 ppb

                              97 ppb
                              72 ppb
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
CHIMNEY
Flue Pipe
Flue Pipe
Flue Pipe
Flue Pipe
Flue Pipe
Flue Pipe
Flue Pipe
Flue Pipe
Chimney
Chimney
Chimney .
Chimney
Chimney
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
FA/OIL
FA/OIL
FA/OIL
FA/OIL
FA/WOOD
FA/WOOD
FA/WOOD
FA/WOOD
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
METHOD

  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS

  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
                                                      GS
                                                      GS
                                                      GS
                                                      GS
                                                      GS
                                                      GS
                                                      GS
                                                      GS
                                                      GS
                                                      GS
                                                      GS
                                                      GS
                                                      GS

                                                      GS
                                                      GS
                                                      GS
                                                      GS
                                                      GS

                                                      GS
                                                      GS
                                                      GS
                                                      GS
                                                      GS

                                                      GS
                                                      GS
                                                      GS
                                                      GS
                                                      GS

                                                      GS
                                                      GS
                                 B-57
-------
WOOD COMBUSTION
 REF *
 :======:
 179/2
 179/2
 179/2

 179/3
 179/3
 179/3
 179/3
 179/3

 179/3
 179/3
 179/3
 179/3
 179/3

 190/A
 190/A
 190/A
 190/A
 190/A
 190/A
 190/A
 190/A
 190/A
 190/A
 190/A
 190/A
 190/A
 190/A
 190/A

 190/B
 190/B
 190/B
 190/B
 190/B
 190/B
 190/B
 190/B
 190/B
 190/B

 190/C
 190/C
 190/C
ISOMER
ISOMER CONC.   PROCESSES   SAMPLE
METHOD

 H6CDF
 H7CDF
 OCDF

 TCDD
 P5CDD
 H6CDD
 H7CDD
 OCDD

 TCDF
 P5CDF
 H6CDF
 H7CDF
 OCDF

 TCDD
 P5CDD
 H6CDD
 H7CDD
 OCDD
 TCDD
 P5CDD
 H6CDD
 H7CDD
 OCDD
 TCDD
 P5CDD
 H6CDD
 H7CDD
 OCDD

 TCDD
 P5CDD
 H6CDD
 H7CDD
 OCDD
 TCDD
 P5CDD
 H6CDD
 H7CDD
 OCDD

 TCDD
 P5CDD
 H6CDD
   42 ppb
   19 ppb
   11 ppb

    1 ppb
    3 ppb
    9 ppb
    7 ppb
    4 ppb

    4 ppb
    2 ppb
    3 ppb
    2 ppb
    1 ppb

17 ug/g FEED
58 ug/g FEED
74 ug/g FEED
18 ug/g FEED
6.4 ug/g FEED
35 ug/g FEED
90 ug/g FEED
80 ug/g FEED
 8 ug/g FEED
0.3 ug/g FEED
26 ug/g FEED
59 ug/g FEED
57 ug/g FEED
 8 ug/g FEED
0.2 ug/g FEED

96 ug/g FEED
120 ug/g FEED
110 ug/g FEED
65 ug/g FEED
1.2 ug/g FEED
210 ug/g FEED
357 ug/g FEED
347 ug/g FEED
29 ug/g FEED
1.2 ug/g FEED

0.4 ug/g FEED
3.5 ug/g FEED
5.3 ug/g FEED
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A-
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FEED
FEED
FEED
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
CHAR. FILT
CHAR. FILT
CHAR. FILT
CHAR. FILT
CHAR. FILT
XAD-2 FILT
XAD-2 FILT
XAD-2 FILT
XAD-2 FILT
XAD-2 FILT
CHAR. FILT
CHAR. FILT
CHAR. FILT
CHAR. FILT
CHAR. FILT
- XAD-2 FILT
XAD-2 FILT
XAD-2 FILT
XAD-2 FILT
XAD-2 FILT
GS
GS
GS
                                B-58
-------
WOOD COMBUSTION
 REF £
= ===== = :
 190/C
 190/C

 190/D
 190/D
 190/D
 190/D
 190/D

 190/E
 190/E
 190/E
 190/E
 190/E

 190/F
 190/F
 190/F
 190/F
 190/F
 190/F

 190/G
 190/G
 190/G
 190/G
 190/G
 190/G

  220
  220
  220

233/2-1
233/2-1
233/2-2
233/2-2
233/2-3
233/2-3
233/2-4
233/2-4
233/2-5
233/2-5
233/2-6
233/2-6
233/2-7
  ISOMER
= = = = = = = = = =::
  H7CDD
  OCDD

  TCDD
  P5CDD
  H6CDD
  H7CDD
  OCDD

  TCDD
  P5CDD -
  H6CDD
  H7CDD
  OCDD

  TCDD
  P5CDD
  H6CDD
  H7CDD
  OCDD
  PCDD

  TCDD
  P5CDD
  H6CDD
  H7CDD
  OCDD
  PCDD

PCDD/PCDF
PCDD/PCDF
PCDD/PCDF

  PCDD
  PCDF
  PCDD
  PCDF
  PCDD
  PCDF
  PCDD
  PCDF
  PCDD
  PCDF
  PCDD
  PCDF
  PCDD
ISOMER CONC.
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD
2.1 ug/g FEED
0.3 ug/g FEED
30 ug/g FEED
84 ug/g FEED
82 ug/g FEED
8.2 ug/g FEED
0.4 ug/g FEED
0.7 ug/g FEED
5.2 ug/g FEED
9.5 ug/g FEED
5.6 ug/g FEED
0.7 ug/g FEED
2100 ug/g FEED
5.0 ug/g FEED
1.0 ug/g FEED
3.0 ug/g FEED
6.0 ug/g FEED
ND
5.2 ug/g FEED
14 ug/g FEED
56 ug/g FEED
172 ug/g FEED
710 ug/g FEED
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.72 ng/dscm
9.20 ng/dscm
4.73 ng/dscm
12.36 ng/dscm
26.75 ng/dscm
14.00 ng/dscm
5.96 ng/dscm
16.35 ng/dscm
6.35 ng/dscm
10.44. ng/dscm
57.25 ng/dscm
12.53 ng/dscm
344.55 ng/dscm
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Furnace
Scrubber
Stack
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
FEED
FEED
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FEED
FEED
FEED
FEED
FEED
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FEED
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FEED
Ash
Liquid
FG/FA
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
GS
GS
CHAR. FILT
CHAR. FILT
CHAR. FILT
CHAR. FILT
CHAR. FILT
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
CHAR. FILT
CHAR. FILT
CHAR. FILT
CHAR. FILT
CHAR. FILT
GS
CHAR. FILT
CHAR. FILT
CHAR. FILT
CHAR. FILT
CHAR. FILT
GS
GS
GS
MM5T
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
                                B-59
-------
WOOD COMBUSTION
 REF #
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG.
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD
233/2-7
233/2-8
233/2-8
233/1-4
233/1-4
233/1-5
233/1-5
233/2-2
233/2-2
233/2-2
233/2-2
233/2-2
233/2-2
233/2-3
233/2-3
233/2-3
233/2-3
233/2-3
233/2-3
233/2-4
233/2-4
233/2-4
233/2-4
233/2-4
233/2-4
233/2-6
233/2-6
233/2-6
233/2-6
233/2-6
233/2-6
233/2-7
233/2-7
233/2-7
233/2-7
233/2-7
233/2-7
233/2-8
233/2-8
233/2-8
233/2-8
233/2-8
233/2-8
PCDF
PCDD
PCDF
PCDD
PCDF
PCDD
PCDF
PCDD
PCDD
PCDD
PCDF
PCDF
PCDF
PCDD
PCDD
PCDD
PCDF
PCDF
PCDF
PCDD
PCDD
PCDD
PCDF
PCDF
PCDF
PCDD
PCDD
PCDD
PCDF
PCDF
PCDF
PCDD
PCDD
PCDD
PCDF
PCDF
PCDF
PCDD
PCDD
PCDD
PCDF
PCDF
PCDF
228.42 ng/dscm
159.75 ng/dscm
185.20 ng/dscm
0.7 ng/g
< 0.3 ng/g
0 . 3 ng/g
< 0.3 ng/g
1.1 ng/g
34.1 ng/g
675.0 ng/g
1.1 ng/g
37.1 ng/g
297.0 ng/g
1.1 ng/g
34.1 ng/g
675.0 ng/g
1.1 ng/g
37.1 ng/g
297.0 ng/g
1.1 ng/g
34.1 ng/g
675.0 ng/g
1.1 ng/g
37.1 ng/g
297.0 ng/g
1.8 ng/g
978.0 ng/g
9492.0 ng/g
1.8 ng/g
185.0 ng/g
2272.0 ng/g
1.8 ng/g
978.0 ng/g
9492.0 ng/g
1.8 ng/g
185.0 ng/g
2272.0 ng/g
1.8 ng/g
978.0 ng/g
9492.0 ng/g
1.8 ng/g
185.0 ng/g
2272.0 ng/g
STACK
STACK
STACK
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
CYCLONE
BAGHOUSE
FURNACE
CYCLONE
BAGHOUSE
FURNACE
CYCLONE
BAGHOUSE
FURNACE
CYCLONE
BAGHOUSE •
FURNACE
CYCLONE
BAGHOUSE
FURNACE
CYCLONE
BAGHOUSE
FURNACE
CYCLONE
BAGHOUSE
FURNACE
CYCLONE
BAGHOUSE
FURNACE
CYCLONE
BAGHOUSE
FURNACE
CYCLONE
BAGHOUSE
FURNACE
CYCLONE
BAGHOUSE
FURNACE
CYCLONE
BAGHOUSE
FG
FG
FG
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
                                 B-60
-------
BOILERS COPIRING WASTES
 REP f
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG.  PROCESSES   SAMPLE
METHOD
33
33
40/A
40/A
40/A
40/A
40/A
40/A
40/A
40/A
40/A
40/A
40/A
40/A
40/D1
40/D1
40/D1
40/D1
40/D1
40/D1
40/D1
40/D1
40/D1
40/D1
40/D1
40/D1
40/D1
40/D1
40/D1
40/D1
40/D1
40/D1
40/D1
40/D1
40/D1
40/D1
40/D1
40/D1
40/D2
40/D2
40/D2
PCDF
PCDD
T4CDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDD-
T4CDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDD
T4CDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDD
T4CDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
2378-TCDF
T4CDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDD
T4CDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
2378-TCDF
T4CDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
0.3 ppm
0 . 6 ppm
ND
2.1 ppb
360 ppb
3600 ppb
3400 ppb
ND
43 ng/m3
14 ng/m3
7.5 ng/m3
5.5 ng/m3
4.6 ng/m3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
.12 ng/m3
.074 ng/m3
.10 ng/m3
.25 ng/m3
.26 ng/m3
ND
2.1 ng/m3
1.4 ng/m3
.77 ng/m3
.94 ng/m3
.27 ng/m3
.24 ng/m3
ND
ND
ND
Stack/ESP
Stack/ESP
_____
	
	
	
	

STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
_____
__ 	
-*. 	
_ 	


	 __
_ 	 _
__ 	
	
_ 	

STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK


	
FA
FA
FEED
FEED
FEED
FEED
FEED
FEED
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FEED
FEED
FEED
FEED
FEED
FEED
FEED
FEED
FEED
FEED
FEED
FEED
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FEED
FEED
FEED
                                                               N/A
                                                               N/A

                                                               GS
                                                               GS
                                                               GS
                                                               GS
                                                               GS
                                                               GS
                                                               MM5T
                                                               MM5T
                                                               MM5T
                                                               MM5T
                                                               MM5T
                                                               MM5T

                                                               GS
                                                               GS
                                                               GS
                                                               GS
                                                               GS
                                                               GS
                                                               GS
                                                               GS
                                                               GS
                                                               GS
                                                               GS
                                                               GS
                                                               MM5T
                                                               MM5T
                                                               MM5T
                                                               MM5T
                                                               MM5T
                                                               MM5T
                                                               MM5T
                                                               MM5T
                                                               MM5T
                                                               MM5T
                                                               MM5T
                                                               MM5T

                                                               GS
                                                               GS
                                                               GS
                                B-61
-------
BOILERS COFIRING WASTES
 REF f

 40/D2
 40/D2
 40/D2
 40/D2
 40/D2
 40/D2
 40/D2
 40/D2
 40/D2
 40/D2
 40/D2
 40/D2
 4.0/D2
 40/D2
 40/D2
 40/D2
 40/D2
 40/D2
 40/D2
 40/D2
 40/D2

 40/E
 40/E
 40/E
 40/E
 40/E
 40/E
 40/E
 40/E
 40/E
 40/E
 40/E
 40/E
 40/E
 40/E
 40/E
 40/E
 40/E
 40/E
 40/E
 40/E
 40/E
 40/E
 40/E
 40/E
ISOMER
H7CDD
OCDD
7 "378— TfDD
T4CDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
9 "37 ft— TPHF
T4CDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDD
T4CDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
2378-TCDF
TMrnn
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
9778— Tiri'nn
T4CDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
O"77Q— mpni?
T4CDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDD
T4CDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
2378-TCDF
ISOMER CONC.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
MT»
iNU
.027 ng/m3
.032 ng/m3
.052 ng/m3
.12 ng/m3
.41 ng/m3
.002 ng/m3
.10 ng/m3
.035 ng/m3
ND
.034 ng/m3
.07 ng/m3
.13 ng/m3
NT)
ND
ND
ND
ND
KTD
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
wr»
CiL>
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
.12 ng/m3
.019 ng/m3
ND
ND
ND
.014 ng/m3
PROCESSES
_____
	
_____
	
— -. 	
	
	
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
__ •___
_____
	
	 —
_____
_ 	
	
	 , —
	
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
SAMPLE
FEED
FEED
£ £j£iU
FEED
FEED
FEED
FEED
FEED
C*T?t?T>
£ CiCfD
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
tJptJTl
f £i£iU
FEED
FEED
FEED
FEED
cic>i?rv
r ciCiLr
FEED
FEED
FEED
FEED
FEED
C»T?t?T^
r £t£iD
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
METHOD

  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T

  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
                                B-62
-------
BOILERS COPIRING WASTES
 REF
ISOMER

40/H
40/H
40/H
40/H
40/H
40/H
40/H
40/H
40/H
40/H
40/H
4t)/H
40/H
40/H
40/H
40/H
40/H
40/H
40/H
40/H
40/H
40/H
40/H
40/H
40/L
40/L
40/L
40/L
40/L
40/L
40/L
40/L
40/L
40/L
40/L
40/L
40/L "
40/L
40/L
40/L
40/L
40/L
40/L
40/L
T4CDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDD
T4CDP
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF '
OCDF
2378-TCDF
T4CDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDD
T4CDF
P5CDF.
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
2378-TCDF
T4CDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDD
T4CDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
2378-TCDF
T4CDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDD
T4CDF
P5CDF
ISOMER CONG.  PROCESSES   SAMPLE
                                                     FEED
                                                     FEED
                                                     FEED
                                                     FEED
                                                     FEED
METHOD

















14
39
077
20











ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ng/m3
ng/m3
ng/m3
ng/m3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND

— _ —
	
_ 	
_____
_____
— ___
	
	
— — — —
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
_____
	
	
	
— — — —
_____
. 	
	
	
__ 	
                           .57 ng/m3
                           .01 ng/m3
                           .066 ng/m3
                           .12 ng/m3
                           .29 ng/m3
                              ND
                           .61 ng/m3
                           .53 ng/m3
                             STACK
                             STACK
                             STACK
                             STACK
                             STACK
                             STACK
                             STACK
                             STACK
                                                    FEED
                                                    FEED
                                                    FEED
                                                    FEED
                                                    FEED
                                                      FG
                                                      FG
                                                      FG
                                                      FG
                                                      FG
                                                      FG
                                                      FG
                                                      FG
                                                      FG
                                                      FG
                                                      FG
                                                      FG

                                                     FEED
                                                     FEED
                                                     FEED
                                                     FEED
                                                     FEED
                                                     FEED
                                                     FEED
                                                     FEED
                                                     FEED
                                                     FEED
                            FG
                            FG
                            FG
                            FG
                            FG
                            FG
                            FG
                            FG
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS

  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T

  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS

 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
                                 B-63
-------
BOILERS COFIRING WASTES
 REF #
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG.
40/L
40/L
40/L
40/L
41/A1
41/A3
41/A1
41/A3
41/A1
41/A3
41/A1
41/A3
41/A1
41/A3
41/A1
41/A3
41/B1 -
41/B2
41/B3
41/B1
41/B2
41/B3
41/B1
41/B2
41/B3
41/B1
41/B2
41/B3
41/B1
41/B2
41/B3
41/B1
41/B2
41/B3
41/D
41/E
41/G
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
2378-TCDF
2378-TCDD
2378-TCDD
TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
OCDD
2378-TCDD
2378-TCDD
2378-TCDD
TCDD
TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
P5CDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H6CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
H7CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
OCDD
OCDD
PCDD
PCDD
PCDD
  57
  57
  57
  57
  57
 TCDF
 PCDF
 PCDF
 PCDD
 TCDD
                          .62 ng/m3
                          .38 ng/m3
                          .34 ng/m3
                          .033 ng/m3

                         <1.5 ng/dscm
                         <0.4 ng/dscm
                          43 ng/dscm
                          38 ng/dscm
                          14 ng/dscm
                          24 ng/dscm
                         7.5 ng/dscm
                          12 ng/dscm
                         5.5 ng/dscm
                         1.6 ng/dscm
                         4.6 ng/dscm
                         0.8 ng/dscm

                              NA
                              NA
                         <0.015 ug/kg
                         <0.20 ug/kg
                          0.20 ug/kg
                          0.28 ug/kg
                         <0.20 ug/kg
                          0.16 ug/kg
                          0.24 ug/kg
                         <0.20 ug/kg
                          1.2 ug/kg
                          2.1 ug/kg
                           11 ug/kg
                          8.0 ug/kg
                           14 ug/kg
                           32 ug/kg
                           28 ug/kg
                           48 ug/kg
                              ND
                              ND
                              ND
     ND
 92.1 ng/g
 18.2 ng/g
  209 ng/g
  2.5 ng/g
PROCESSES
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
Stack
Stack
Stack
Feed
Compos it
Feed
Compos it
Compos it
SAMPLE
! S5 SZ SE SS w SSS S5 '
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
FG/FA
FG/FA
FG/FA
Sludge
Ash
Sludge
Ash
Ash
METHOD  .

 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T

 HM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T

  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
                                 B-64
-------
BOILERS COFIRING WASTES
 REF *
:==:==:=:
  57
  57
  57
  57

  74
  74
  74
  74
  74
  74
  74
  74
  74
  74
 8 I/A
 8 I/A
 81/C
 81/C
 81/D
 81/D
 81/E
 81/E
 81/F
 81/F
 81/G
 81/G

 8 I/A
 81/C
 81/D
 81/E
 81/F
 81/G

 81/D
 81/D
 81/D
 81/D
 81/D
 81/D
 81/D
 81/D
 81/D
   ISOMER
===========
 PCDD/PCDF
    TCDD
    PCDD
    TCDF

    TCDD
   P5CDD
   H6CDD
   H7CDD
    OCDD
    TCDF -
   P5CDF
   H6CDF
   H7CDF
    OCDF
    TCDD
    OCDD
    TCDD
    OCDD
    TCDD
    OCDD
    TCDD
    OCDD
    TCDD
    OCDD
    TCDD
    OCDD

    TCDF
    TCDF
    TCDF
    TCDF
    TCDF
    TCDF

    TCDD
  P5CDD
  H6CDD
  H7CDD
    OCDD
    TCDF
  P5CDF
  H6CDF
  H7CDF
ISOMER CONC.  PROCESSES   SAMPLE
METHOD
ND
ND
306 ng/g
3.7 ng/g
ND
4.5 ng/g
110 ng/g
380 ng/g
43 ng/g
13 ng/g
470 ng/g
1300 ng/g
520 ng/g
550 ng/g
ND
ND
ND
4.5 ug/m3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
17 ug/m3
1.4 ug/m3
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.17 ug/m3
ND
ND
ND
178 ng/g
290 ng/g
360 ng/g
183 ng/g
531 ng/g
' 1720 ng/g
540 ng/g
920 ng/g
Stack
Feed
Feed
Compos it
Residue
Residue
Residue
Residue
Residue
Residue
Residue
Residue
Residue
Residue
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
FIRETUBE
FIRETUBE
FIRETUBE
FIRETUBE
FIRETUBE
FIRETUBE
FIRETUBE
FIRETUBE
FIRETUBE
FG
Sludge
Sludge
Ash
Ash
Ash
Ash
Ash
Ash
Ash
Ash
Ash
Ash
Ash
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
FA
Train
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
                                 B-65
-------
BOILERS COFIRING WASTES
REP #
81/D
95
96
ISOMER
OCDF
PCDD/PCDF
PCDD
ISOMER CONG.
66 ng/g
ND
ND
PROCESSES
FIRETUBE
STACK
STACK
SAMPLE
FA
FG
FG/FA
  193
  193
  193
  193
  193
  193
  193
  193
PCDF
TCDF
TCDD
PCDD
PCDF
TCDF
PCDD
TCDD
    ND
    ND
0.31 ug/g
0.01 ug/g
 2.6 ug/g
0.90 ug/g
 5.2 ug/g
0.96 ug/g
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
FURNACE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
METHOD

  GS

 MM5T

 SASS

  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
                                 B-66
-------
HAZARDOUS WASTE INCINERATOR
 REF *      ISOMER        ISOMER CONG.
                           PROCESSES   SAMPLE
METHOD
  1/1
  1/1
  1/1
  1/1
  1/2
  1/2
  1/2
  1/2
  1/2
  1/2
  1/3
  1/3

   2
   2
  2/3
  2/4
  2/7
  2/8
  2/9
 2/10
  2/3
  2/3
  2/4
  2/7
  2/8
  2/9
  2/9
 2/10
 2/10

21/2AA
21/2AA
21/2AA
21/2AA
21/2AB
21/2AB
21/2AB
21/2AB
21/2BA
21/2BA
21/2BA
21/2BA
21/2BB
TCDD
TCDD
TCDD
TCDD
TCDD
TCDD
TCDD
TCDD
TCDD
TCDD
TCDD
TCDD

TCDD
TCDD
TCDF
TCDF
TCDF
TCDF
TCDF
TCDF
TCDF
TCDF
TCDF
TCDF
TCDF
TCDF
TCDF
TCDF
TCDF

PCDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
08CDD
PCDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
08CDD
PCDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
08CDD
PCDD
ND
ND
2.5 ug/ml
ND
2.8 ug/ml
ND
0.136 ng/ml
3.34 ng/ml
1 ug/ml
ND
2.8 ug/ml
ND
ND
ND
42 ng/g
80 ng/g
42 ng/g
25 ng/g
38 ng/g
58 ng/g
<3 ng/m3
<2 ng/m3
NA
NA
<0.7 ng/m3
NA
NA
<1 ng/m3
<0.3 ng/m3
< 1 ng/m3
< 1 ng/m3
< 1 ng/m3
2.3 ng/m3
< 1 ng/m3
< 2 ng/m3
< 1 ng/m3
< 1 ng/m3
< 1 ng/m3
< 2 ng/m3
< 2 ng/m3
< 1 ng/m3
< 1 ng/m3
	
STACK
	
STACK
__ —
STACK
STACK
STACK
	
STACK
	
STACK
_____
Stack
_ 	
	
	
	
— , —
	
Stack
Stack
Stack
. Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
FEED
FG
FEED
FG
FEED
FG
FG
FG
FEED
FG
FEED
FG
Feed
FG
Feed
Feed
Feed
Feed
Feed
Feed
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
GS
MM5T
GS
MM5T
GS
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
GS
MM5T
GS
MM5T
GS
BIT
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
BIT
BIT
BIT
BIT
BIT
BIT
BIT
BIT
BIT
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
                                 B-67
-------
HAZARDOUS WASTE INCINERATOR
 REF *
ISOMER
21/2BB
21/2BB
21/2BB
62/TB
62/TB
62/TB
62/TB
62/RK
62/RK
62/RK
62/RK
62/RK
62/RK
62/RK
62/RK
62/RK
62/RK
62/RK
62/RK
62/RK
62/RK
62/RK
62/RK
62/RK
88/1
88/1
88/1
88/1
88/1
88/1
88/1
88/1
88/1
88/1
88/2
88/2
88/2
88/2
88/2
88/2
88/2
H6CDD
H7CDD
08CDD
TCDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2,3,7,8 TCDD
TCDD .
H6CDD
H6CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
2,3,7,8 TCDD
TCDD
H7CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
TCDD
H6CDD .
H7CDD
OCDD
OCDD
T4CDD
T4CDF
P5CDD
P5CDF
H6CDD
H6CDF
H7CDD
H7CDF
OCDD
OCDF
T4CDD
T4CDF
P5CDD
P5CDF
H6CDD
H6CDF
H7CDD
   ISOMER CONC.
================
    <  1  ng/m3
    <  1  ng/m3
    <  2  ng/m3
                               ND
                            7.6 ppb
                             91 ppb
                            306 ppb
                               ND
                               ND
                            2.1 ppb
                           21225 ppb
                            200 ppb
                            970 ppb
                             55 ppb
                            7705 ppb
                           164750 ppb
                             32 ppb
                           263000 ppb
                             46 ppb
                            2500 ppb
                            3400 ppb
                           26000 ppb
                           42000 ppb
                            1200 ppb
PROCESSES
===========
   STACK
   STACK
   STACK
                              Stack
                              Stack
                              Stack
                              Stack
                              Stack
                              Stack
                              Stack
                              Stack
                             Scrubber
                             Scrubber
                              Stack
                              Stack
                              Stack
                              Stack
                              Stack
                             Scrubber
                             Scrubber
                             Scrubber
                             Scrubber
                             Scrubber
                             Scrubber
                                                    SAMPLE
                                                  METHOD
2.4E-9 g/dscm
9.7E-9 g/DSCM
ND
1.9E-9 g/dscm
ND
ND
ND
ND
7.3E-9 g/dscm
ND
1.4E-8 g/dscm
1.7E-9 g/dscm
ND
6.8E-9 g/dscm
ND
ND
ND
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
                                                      FG
                                                      PG
                                                      FG
                               FA
                               FA
                               FA
                               FA
                            FA/FUEL
                            FA/FUEL
                            FA/FUEL
                            FA/FUEL
                            FA/FUEL
                            FA/FUEL
                           FA/NO  FUEL
                           FA/NO  FUEL
                           FA/NO  FUEL
                           FA/NO  FUEL
                           FA/NO  FUEL
                           FA/NO  FUEL
                           FA/NO  FUEL
                           FA/NO  FUEL
                           FA/NO  FUEL
                           FA/NO  FUEL
                           FA/NO  FUEL
                                                      FG
                                                      FG
                                                      FG
                                                      FG
                                                      FG
                                                      FG
                                                      FG
                                                      FG
                                                      FG
                                                      FG

                                                      FG
                                                      FG
                                                      FG
                                                      FG
                                                      FG
                                                      FG
                                                      FG
                                                  TRAIN
                                                  TRAIN
                                                  TRAIN
                         GS
                         GS
                         GS
                         GS
                         GS
                         GS"
                         GS
                         GS
                     FILTERED
                     FILTERED
                         GS
                         GS
                         GS
                         GS
                         GS
                     FILTERED
                     FILTERED
                     FILTERED
                     FILTERED
                     FILTERED
                     FILTERED
                                                   MM5T
                                                   MM5T
                                                   MM5T
                                                   MM5T
                                                   MM5T
                                                   MM5T
                                                   MM5T
                                                   MM5T
                                                   MM5T
                                                   MM5T

                                                   MM5T
                                                   MM5T
                                                   MM5T
                                                   MM5T
                                                   MM5T
                                                   MM5T
                                                   MM5T
                                B-68
-------
HAZARDOUS WASTE INCINERATOR
 REF *

 88/2
 88/2
 88/2

 88/3
 88/3
 88/3
 88/3
 88/3
 88/3
 88/3
 88/3
 88/3
 88/3

 88/4
 88/4
 88/4
 88/4
 88/4
 88/4
 88/4
 88/4
 88/4
 88/4
ISOMER
 ISOMER CONG.  PROCESSES   SAMPLE
        METHOD


 H7CDF
 CtCDD
 OCDF

 T4CDD
 T4CDF
 P5CDD
 P5CDF
 H6CDD
 H6CDF
 H7CDD
 H7CDF
 OCDD
 OCDF

 T4CDD
 T4CDF
 P5CDD
 P5CDF
 H6CDD
 H6CDF
 H7CDD
 H7CDF
 OCDD
 OCDF
      ND         STACK
      ND         STACK
1.7E-9 g/dscm    STACK

3.4E-9 g/dscm    STACK
      ND         STACK
      ND         STACK
2.5Er9 g/dscm    STACK
      ND         STACK
      ND         STACK
      ND         STACK
      ND         STACK
8.4E-9 g/dscm    STACK
      ND         STACK

7.5E-9 g/dscm    STACK
1.5E-9 g/dscm    STACK
      ND         STACK
7.5E-9 g/dscm    STACK
      ND         STACK
      ND         STACK
      ND         STACK
3.8E-9 g/dscm    STACK
3.8E-8 g/dscm    STACK
7.5E-9 g/dscm    STACK
FG
FG
FG

FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG

FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T

MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T

MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
 108/3
 108/3
 108/3
 108/3
 108/3
 108/3
 108/3
 108/3
 108/3
 108/3

 108/4
 108/4
 108/4
 108/4
 108/4
 108/4
 108/4
 108/4
 TCDD
 P5CDD
 H6CDD
 H7CDD
 OCDD
 TCDF
 P5CDF
 H6CDF
 H7CDF
 OCDF

 TCDD
 P5CDD
 H6CDD
 H7CDD
 OCDD
 TCDF
 P5CDF
 H6CDF




25









8.



ND
ND
ND
ND
ng/samp.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
7 ng/samp.
ND
ND
ND
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
                             FG
                             FG
                             FG
                             FG
                             FG
                             FG
                             FG
                             FG
                             FG
                             FG

                             FG
                             FG
                             FG
                             FG
                             FG
                             FG
                             FG
                             FG
         MM5T
         MM5T
         MM5T
         MM5T
         MM5T
         MM5T
         MM5T
         MM5T
         MM5T
         MM5T

         MM5T
         MM5T
         MM5T
         MM5T
         MM5T
         MM5T
         MM5T
         MM5T
                                  B-69
-------
HAZARDOUS WASTE INCINERATOR
 REF f

 108/4
 108/4

 108/5
 108/5
 108/5
 108/5
 108/5
 108/5
 108/5
 108/5
 108/5
 108/5

  136

153A/1
153A/1
153A/1
153A/1
153A/1
153A/1
153A/1
153A/1
153A/1
153A/1

153A/2
153A/2
153A/2
153A/2
153A/2
153A/2
153A/2
153A/2
153A/2
153A/2

153A/3
153A/3
153A/3
153A/3

*161/A
*161/A
*161/A
 ISOMER

  H7CDF
  OCDF

  TCDD
  P5CDD
  H6CDD
  H7CDD
  OCDD
  TCDF
  P5CDF
  H6CDF
  H7CDF
  OCDF

PCDD/PCDF

  TCDD
  P5CDD
  H6CDD
  H7CDD
  OCDD
  TCDF
  P5CDF  -
  H6CDF
  H7CDF
  OCDF

  TCDD
  P5CDD
  H6CDD
  H7CDD
  OCDD
  TCDF
  P5CDF
  H6CDF
  H7CDF
  OCDF

  TCDD
  OCDD
  TCDF
  P5CDF

  TCDD
  TCDF
  TCDD
ISOMER CONC.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
57.6 ng/samp.
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
PROCESSES
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
SAMPLE
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG 	
METHOD
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
— 	 MM5T
   ND
Stack
47.72 ng/m3
6.52 ng/m3
—
0.21 ng/m3
0.64 ng/m3
86.07 ng/m3
13.61 ng/m3
2.65 ng/m3
0.26 ng/m3
0.06 ng/m3
43.75 ng/m3
1.94 ng/m3
0.37 ng/m3
0.84 ng/m3
2.53 ng/m3
76.98 ng/m3
4.28 ng/m3
1.95 ng/m3
0.55 ng/m3
0".17 ng/m3
4.92 ng/m3
0.46 ng/m3
94.53 ng/m3
0.18 ng/m3
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
   ND  .
Detected
   ND
Stack
 PART

  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG

  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG

  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG

 Feed
 Feed
FG/FA
MM5T

MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T

MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T

MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T

 GS
 GS
MM5T
                                B-70
-------
HAZARDOUS WASTE INCINERATOR
 REP *
=======
*161/A

*161/B
*161/B
*161/B
*161/B

*161/C
*161/C
*161/C

*161/D
*161/D
*161/D
*161/D

*161/E
*161/E
*161/E
*161/E

*161/F
*161/P
*161/F

 162/1
 162/1
 162/1
 162/1
 162/1
 162/1
 162/1
 162/1
 162/1
 162/1

 162/2
 162/2
 162/2
 162/2
 162/2
 162/2
 162/2
 162/2
 162/2
 162/2
 ISOMER
:=======
 TCDF

 TCDD
 TCDF
 TCDD
 TCDF

 TCDD
 TCDD
 TCDF

 TCDD
 TCDF
 TCDD
 TCDF

 TCDD
 TCDF
 TCDD
 TCDF

 TCDD
 TCDD
 TCDF

 TCDD
 P5CDD
 H6CDD
 H7CDD
 OCDD
 TCDF
 P5CDF
 H6CDF
 H7CDF
 OCDF

 TCDD
 P5CDD
 H6CDD
 H7CDD
 OCDD
 TCDF
 P5CDF
 H6CDF
 H7CDF
 OCDF
ISOMER CONG,

 0.7 ng/m3

     ND
     ND
     ND
     ND

     ND
     ND
  Detected

     ND
     ND
     ND
     ND

     ND
     ND
     ND
     ND

  Detected
  15 ng/m3
  40 ng/m3

  0 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml


  54 ng/ml
    N/A
     ND
     ND
     ND

.  0 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml
  28 ng/ml
  23 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml
:OCESSES
Stack
Stack
Stack
	 —_
	
Stack
— _ —
— ___
Stack
Stack "
— — — —

— _ —
Stack
Stack
*.*•*_•...
Stack
Stack
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
SAMPLE
FG/FA
FG/FA
FG/FA
Feed
Feed
FG/FA
Feed
Feed
FG/FA
n _i-i fr-t -m.
FG/FA
Feed
Feed
Feed
FG/FA
FG/FA
Feed
FG/FA
FG/FA
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
METHOD

 MM5T

 MM5T
 MM5T
  GS
  GS

 MM5T
  GS
  GS

 MM5T
 MM5T
  GS
  GS

  GS
  GS
 MM5T
 MM5T

  GS
 MM5T
 MM5T

TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN

TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
                                 B-71
-------
HAZARDOUS WASTE INCINERATOR
 REF *
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG.  PROCESSES   SAMPLE
                    METHOD
162/3
162/3
162/3
162/3
162/3
162/3
162/3
162/3
162/3
162/3
162/4
162/4
162/4
162/4
162/4
162/4
162/4
162/4
162/4
162/4
162/5
162/5
162/5
162/5
162/5
162/5
162/5
162/5
162/5
162/5
162/6
162/6
162/6
162/6
162/6
162/6
162/6
162/6 .
162/6
162/6
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
O8CDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
0 ng/ml
0 ng/ml
0 ng/ml
	
	
0 ng/ml
120 ng/ml
0 ng/ml
— _
— _
0 ng/ml
11 ng/ml
0 ng/ml
	
_. —
10 ng/ml
170 ng/ml
0 ng/ml
	
— —
0 ng/ml
0 ng/ml
0 ng/ml
	
___
130 ng/ml
48 ng/ml
10 ng/ml
	
— —
0 ng/ml.
0 ng/ml
140 ng/ml
	
___
96 ng/ml
25 ng/ml
0 ng/ml
0 ng/ml
0 ng/ml
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
 162/7
 TCDD
  0 ng/ml
STACK
FG
TRAIN
                                 B-72
-------
HAZARDOUS WASTE INCINERATOR
 REF *
sss=s=s==
 162/7
 162/7
 162/7
 162/7
 162/7
 162/7
 162/7
 162/7
 162/7

 162/8
 162/8
 162/8
 162/8
 162/8
 162/8
 162/8
 162/8
 162/8
 162/8

 162/9
 162/9
 162/9
 162/9
 162/9
 162/9
 162/9
 162/9
 162/9
 162/9

162/10
162/10
162/10
162/10
162/10
162/10
162/10
162/10
162/10
162/10

162/11
162/11
162/11
ISOMER

 P5CDD
 H6CDD
 H7CDD
 OCDD
 TCDF
 P5CDF
 H6CDF
 H7CDF
 OCDF

 TCDD
 P5CDD
 H6CDD
 H7CDD
 OCDD
 TCDF
 P5CDF
 H6CDF
 H7CDF
 OCDF

 TCDD
 P5CDD
 H6CDD
 H7CDD
 OCDD
 TCDF
 P5CDF
 H6CDF
 H7CDF
 OCDF

 TCDD
 P5CDD
 H6CDD
 H7CDD
 OCDD
 TCDF
 P5CDF
 H6CDF
 H7CDF
 OCDF

 TCDD
 P5CDD
 H6CDD
ISOMER CONG.  PROCESSES   SAMPLE
  0 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml
  92 ng/ml
  78 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml

  0 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml
  0 mg/ml
  92 ng/ml
  78 ng/ml
  0 ng/mL
  0 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml
  17 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml

 790 ng/ml
 170 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml

  0 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml
 830 ng/ml
  52 ng/ml
  9 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml

  0 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK

STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK

STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK

STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK

STACK
STACK
STACK
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG

FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG

FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG

FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG

FG
FG
FG
METHOD

TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN

TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN

TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN

TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN

TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
                                 B-73
-------
HAZARDOUS WASTE INCINERATOR
 REF *
ISOMER
162/11
162/11
162/11
162/11
162/11
162/11
162/11
162/12
162/12
162/12
162/12
162/12
162/12
162/12
162/12
162/12
162/12
162/13
162/13
162/13
162/13
162/13
162/13
162/13
162/13
162/13
162/13
162/14
162/14
162/14
162/14
162/14
162/14
162/14
162/14
162/14
162/14
162/15
162/15
162/15
162/15
162/15
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
ISOMER CONG.  PROCESSES
                            0 ng/ml
                            0 ng/ml
                           760 ng/ml
                           210 ng/ml
                            16 ng/ml
                            0 ng/ml
                            0 ng/ml

                              N/A
                              N/A
                              N/A
                              N/A
                              N/A
                              N/A
                              N/A
                              N/A
                              N/A
                              N/A

                            0 ng/ml
                            10 ng/ml
                            0 ng/ml
                           980 ng/ml
                           450 ng/ml
                            60 ng/ml
                            0 ng/ml
                            0 ng/ml

                            0 ng/ml
                            2 ng/ml
                            0 ng/ml
                           2500 ng/ml
                           210 ng/ml
                            15 ng/ml
                            0 ng/ml
                            0 ng/ml

                              N/A
                              N/A
                              N/A
                              N/A
                              N/A
                              STACK
                              STACK
                              STACK
                              STACK
                              STACK
                              STACK
                              STACK

                              STACK
                              STACK
                              STACK
                              STACK
                              STACK
                              STACK
                              STACK
                              STACK
                              STACK
                              STACK

                              STACK
                              STACK
                              STACK
                              STACK
                              STACK
                              STACK
                              STACK
                              STACK
                              STACK
                              STACK

                              STACK
                              STACK
                              STACK
                              STACK
                              STACK
                              STACK
                              STACK
                              STACK
                              STACK
                              STACK

                              STACK
                              STACK
                              STACK
                              STACK
                              STACK
WPLE
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
METHOD
'TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
                                B-74
-------
HAZARDOUS WASTE INCINERATOR
 REP *
=======
162/15
162/15
162/15
162/15
162/15

162/16
162/16
162/16
162/16
162/16
162/16
162/16
162/16
162/16
162/16

162/17
162/17
162/17
162/17
162/17
162/17
162/17
162/17
162/17
162/17

162/18
162/18
162/18
162/18
162/18
162/18
162/18
162/18
162/18
162/18

162/19
162/19
162/19
162/19
162/19
162/19
162/19
ISOMER
 TCDF
 P5CDF
 H6CDF
 H7CDF
 OCDF

 TCDD
 P5CDD
 H6CDD
 H7CDD
 OCDD
 TCDF
 P5CDF
 H6CDF
 H7CDF
 OCDF

 TCDD
 P5CDD
 H6CDD
 H7CDD
 OCDD
 TCDF
 P5CDF
 H6CDF
 H7CDF
 OCDF

 TCDD
 P5CDD
 H6CDD
 H7CDD
 OCDD
 TCDF
 P5CDF
 H6CDF
 H7CDF
 OCDF

 TCDD
 P5CDD
 H6CDD
 H7CDD
 OCDD
 TCDF
 P5CDF
 ISOMER" CONG.  PROCESSES
     N/A         STACK
     N/A         STACK
     N/A         STACK
     N/A         STACK
     N/A         STACK

   12 ng/ml      STACK
      NQ         STACK
      NQ         STACK
  180 ng/ml      STACK
   33 ng/ml      STACK
      NQ         STACK
      NQ         STACK
      NQ         STACK
 16000 ng/ml     STACK
  1800 ng/ml     STACK

   0 ng/ml .      STACK
   0 ng/ml       STACK
   0 ng/ml       STACK
  690 ng/ml      STACK
   78 ng/ml      STACK
 3 E-6 ng/ml     STACK
1.4 E-7 ng/ml    STACK
1.9 e-6 ng/ml    STACK
 61000 ng/ml     STACK
  7200 ng/ml   .  STACK

   0 ng/ml       STACK
   0 ng/ml       STACK
   0 ng/ml       STACK
  490 ng/ml      STACK
  110 ng/ml      STACK
2.4 E-6 ng/ml    STACK
9.9 E-6 ng/ml    STACK
1.4 E-6 ng/ml    STACK
 39000 ng/ml     STACK
  2700 ng/ml     STACK

     N/A         STACK
     N/A         STACK
     N/A         STACK
     N/A •        STACK
     N/A         STACK
     N/A         STACK
     N/A         STACK
SAMPLE

  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG

  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG

  FG
  FG
.  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG

  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG

  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG
  FG
METHOD

TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN

TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN

TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN

TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN .

TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
                                 B-75
-------
HAZARDOUS WASTE INCINERATOR
 REF #

162/19
162/19
162/19

162/20
162/20
162/20
162/20
162/20
162/20
162/20
162/20
162/20
162/20

162/21
162/21
162/21
162/21
162/21
162/21
162/21
162/21
162/21
162/21

162/22
162/22
162/22
162/22
162/22
162/22
162/22
162/22
162/22
162/22
 ISOMER

  H6CDF
  H7CDF
  OCDF

  TCDD
  P5CDD
  H6CDD
  H7CDD
  OCDD
  TCDF
  P5CDF
  H6CDF
  H7CDF
  OCDF

  TCDD
  P5CDD
  H6CDD
  H7CDD
  OCDD
  TCDF
  P5CDF
  H6CDF
  H7CDF
  OCDF

  TCDD
  P5CDD
  H6CDD
  H7CDD
  OCDD
  TCDF
  P5CDF
  H6CDF
  H7CDF
  OCDF
ISOMER CONG.  PROCESSES   SAMPLE
                     METHOD
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A

 540 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml
 3200 ng/ml
 6100 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml
 650 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml
  90 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml
>24000 ng/ml
>28000 ng/ml
 6500 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml
  0 ng/ml

    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
    N/A
 STACK
 STACK
 STACK

 STACK
 STACK
 STACK
 STACK
 STACK
 STACK
 STACK
 STACK
 STACK
 STACK

 STACK
 STACK
 STACK
 • STACK
 STACK
 STACK
 STACK
 STACK
 STACK
 STACK

 STACK
 STACK
 STACK
 STACK
 STACK
 STACK
 STACK
 STACK
 STACK
 STACK
 FG
 FG
 FG

 FG
 FG
 FG
 FG
 FG
 FG
 FG
 FG
 FG
 FG

 FG
 FG
 FG
 FG
 FG
 FG
 FG
 FG
 FG
 FG

 FG
 FG
 FG
 FG
 FG
 FG
 FG
 FG
 FG
 FG
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN

TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN

TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN

TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
TRAIN
 194/1
 194/1
 194/1
 194/1
 194/1
 194/1
 194/1
 194/1
2378-TCDD
  TCDD
  P5CDD
  H6CDD
  H7CDD
  OCDD
2378-TCDF
  TCDF
 <.005 ug/g
  .96 ug/g
  1.4 ug/g
  2.0 ug/g
  .7  ug/g
  .2  ug/g
  .1  ug/g
  .9  ug/g
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
                                B-76
-------
HAZARDOUS WASTE INCINERATOR
 REF #
:===== =
 194/1
 194/1
 194/1
 194/1
 194/1
 194/1
 194/1
 194/1
 194/1
 194/1
 194/1
 194/1
 194/1
 194/1
 194/1
 194/1

 194/2
 194/2
 194/2
 194/2
 194/2
 194/2
 194/2
 194/2
 194/2
 194/2
 194/2
 194/2
 194/2
 194/2
 194/2
 194/2
 194/2
 194/2
 194/2
 194/2
234/R/l
234/R/2
234/R/3
234/R/l
234/R/2
234/R/3
234/E/l
  ISOMER
:s=sss==:s2:=:s
  P5CDF
  H6CDF
  H7CDF
  OCDF
 2378-TCDD
  TCDD
  P5CDD
  H6CDD
  H7CDD
  OCDD
 2378-TCDF
  TCDF
  P5CDF
  H6CDF
  H7CDF
  OCDF

  TCDD
  P5CDD
  H6CDD
  H7CDD
  OCDD
  TCDF
  P5CDF
  H6CDF
  H7CDF
  OCDF
  TCDD
  P5CDD
  H6CDD
  H7CDD
  OCDD
  TCDF
  P5CDF
  H6CDF
  H7CDF
  OCDF
   TCDD
   TCDD
   TCDD
  , TCDF
   TCDF
   TCDF
   TCDD
SOMER CONG.
=============
1.5 ug/g
.15 ug/g
.06 ug/g
.006 ug/g
<.001 ug/g
.01 ug/g
.02 ug/g
.04ug/g
.10 ug/g
.14 ug/g
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
< 0.1 ng/g
< .05 ng/g
< 0.7 ng/g
< 0.1 ng/g
< 0.2 ng/g
< 0.1 ng/g
< .05 ng/g
< 0.7 ng/g
< 1.4 ng/g
< 0.3 ng/g
< .05 ng/g
< .05 ng/g
< 0.2 ng/g
< .05 ng/g
< 0.1 ng/g
< 0.2 ng/g
< .05 ng/g
< 0.3 ng/g
< 3.0 ng/g
< 0.3 ng/g
6.94 ng .
1.42 ng
0 ng
13.5 ng
22 ng
2 ng
0.263 ng
PROCESSES
==========
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
BOTTOM
XAD-2 (1)
XAD-2 (1)
XAD-2 (1)
XAD-2 (1)
XAD-2 (1)
XAD-2 (1)
XAD-2 (1)
XAD-2 (1)
XAD-2 (1)
XAD-2 (1)
XAD-2 (2)
XAD-2 (2)
XAD-2 (2)
XAD-2 (2)
XAD-2 (2)
XAD-2 (2)
XAD-2 (2)
XAD-2 (2)
XAD-2 (2)
XAD-2 (2)
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
SAMPLE
=========
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
PART
PART
PART
PART
PART
PART
PART
PART
PART
PART
PART
PART
PART
PART
PART
PART
PART
PART
PART
PART
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
METHOD
==========
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
FILT.
FILT.
FILT.
FILT.
FILT.
FILT.
FILT.
FILT.
FILT.
FILT.
FILT.
FILT.
FILT.
FILT.
FILT.
FILT.
FILT.
FILT.
FILT.
FILT.
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
                                B-77
-------
HAZARDOUS WASTE INCINERATOR
 REF f

234/E/2
234/E/3
234/E/l
234/E/2
234/E/3

 *246
 *246
   ISOMER
ISOMER CONG.  PROCESSES   SAMPLE
                    METHOD
TCDD
TCDD
TCDF
TCDF
TCDF
0.476 ng
0 ng
2 ng
6 ng
0 ng
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
Stack
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
2,3,7,8 TCDD
    P5CDD
     ND
   40 ng
Stack
Stack
FG
FG
MM5T
MM5T
                                 B-78
-------
LIME/CEMENT KILNS
 REP
===:==
  20A
  20A

  20B
  20B

  58A
  58A

  184
  184
  184
  184
  184
  184
  184
  184,
  184
  184
  184
  184
  184
  184
  184
  184
  184
  184
  184
  184
  184
  184
  184
  184
  184
  184
  184
  184
  184
  184
 ISOMER
:=—==== =
 PCDD
 PCDF

 PCDD
 PCDF

 PCDD
 PCDD

 TCDD.
 P5CDD
 H6CDD
 H7CDD
 OCDD
 TCDF
 P5CDF
 H6CDF
 H7CDF
 OCDF
 TCDD
 P5CDD
 H6CDD
 H7CDD
 OCDD
 TCDF
 P5CDF
 H6CDF
 H7CDF
 OCDF
 TCDD
 P5CDD
 H6CDD
 H7CDD
 OCDD
 TCDF
 P5CDF
 H6CDF
 H7CDF
 OCDF
ISOMER CONG
. PROCESSES
========================













1.
0.







1
25
8.











ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
35 ng/m3
74 ng/m3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1 ng/m3
.7 ng/m3
1 ng/m3
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
BAGHOUSE
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
BAGHOUSE
SAMPLE METHOD
=======
FG
FG
FG
FG
DUST
PART
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
. FG
FG
PART
PART
PART
PART
PART
PART
PART
PART
PART
PART
DUST
DUST
DUST
DUST
DUST
DUST
DUST
DUST
DUST
DUST
===========
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
GS
FILTER
SASS
SASS
SASS
SASS
SASS
SASS
SASS
SASS
SASS
SASS
FILTER
FILTER
FILTFR
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
                                 B-79
-------
HOSPITAL INCINERATORS
 REF #
ISOMER

 31 A/2
 31A/2
 31A/2
 31 A/2
 31A/2
 31A/2
 31A/2
 31A/2
 31 A/2
 31 A/2

 31 A/3
 31A/3
 31A/3
 31A/3
 31 A/3
 31A/3
 31 A/3
 31 A/3
 31 A/3
 31A/3

 31 A/4
 31A/4
 31 A/4
 31A/4
 31A/4
 31A/4
 31A/4
 31A/4
 31 A/4
 31 A/4

 31 A/5
 31 A/5
 31 A/5
 31A/5
 31 A/5
 31A/5
 31A/5
 31A/5
 31A/5
 31A/5

 31 A/A
 31 A/A
 TCDD
 P5CDD
 H6CDD
 H7CDD
 OCDD
 TCDF
 P5CDF
 H6CDF
 H7CDF
 OCDF

 TCDD
 P5CDD
 H6CDD
 H7CDD
 OCDD
 TCDF
 P5CDF
 H6CDF
 H7CDF
 OCDF

 TCDD
 P5CDD
 H6CDD
 H7CDD
 OCDD
 TCDF
 P5CDF
 H6CDF
 H7CDF
 OCDF

 TCDD
 P5CDD
 H6CDD
 H7CDD
 OCDD
 TCDF
 P5CDF
 H6CDF
 H7CDF
 OCDF

 TCDD
 P5CDD
ISOMER CONG.  PROCESSES   SAMPLE    METHOD
                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN

                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN

                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN

                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN
                            FG      TRAIN

                            FA        GS
                            FA        GS
ND
22 ng/g
15.6 ng/g-
19.2 ng/g
26.8 ng/g
18.9 ng/g
50.7 ng/g
57.5 ng/g
20.8 ng/g
10.4 ng/g
ND
28.6 ng/g
10.6 ng/g
18.9 ng/g
25.4 ng/g
34.9 ng/g
48.3 ng/g
35.7 ng/g
22 ng/g
9.4 ng/g
ND
4.1 ng/g
9.7 ng/g
11.4 ng/g
26.7 ng/g
22.5 ng/g
32.6 ng/g
29.8 ng/g
24.7 ng/g
7.7 ng/g
ND
8 ng/g
19.2 ng/g
17.4 ng/g
12.4 ng/g
31.6 ng/g
53.1 ng/g
48.7 ng/g
35.4 ng/g
27.7 ng/g
6.3 ng/g
26.6 ng/g
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
. STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
DUCT WALL
DUCT WALL
                                £-80
-------
HOSPITAL INCINERATORS
 REP #
ss==s=s==:==ss
 31 A/A
 31 A/A
 31 A/A
 31 A/A
 31 A/A
 31 A/A
 31 A/A
 31 A/A

 31A/B
 31A/B
 31A/B
 S1A/B
 31A/B
 31A/B
 31A/B
 31A/B
 31A/B
 31A/B

 31A/C
 31A/C
 31A/C
 31A/C
 31A/C
 31A/C
 31A/C
 31A/C
 31A/C
 31A/C

 31A/D
 31A/D
 31A/D
 31A/D
 31A/D
 31A/D
 31A/D
 31A/D
 31A/D
 31A/D

62A/US1
62A/US1
62A/US2
62A/US2
 ISOMER
: ===== = =
 H6CDD
 H7CDD
 OCDD
 TCDF
 P5CDF
 H6CDF
 H7CDF
 OCDF

 TCDD
 P5CDD
 H6CDD
 H7CDD
 OCDD
 TCDF
 P5CDF
 H6CDF
 H7CDF
 OCDF

 TCDD
 P5CDD
 H6CDD
 H7CDD
 OCDD
 TCDF
 P5CDF
 H6CDF
 H7CDF
 OCDF

 TCDD
 P5CDD
 H6CDD
 H7CDD
 OCDD
 TCDF
 P5CDF
 H6CDF
 H7CDF
 OCDF

 PCDD
 PCDF
 PCDD
 PCDF
ISOMER CONG.  PROCESSES   SAMPLE
METHOD
87 ng/g
45.6 ng/g
93.6 ng/g
32.9 ng/g
70.1 ng/g
61.8 ng/g
96.2 ng/g
36.8 ng/g
125.8 ng/g
489.1 ng/g
933.8 ng/g
997=7 ng/g
3931.5 ng/g
937.5 ng/g
1599 ng/g
1732.8 ng/g
840.5 ng/g
760*2 ng/g
0.1 ng/g
0.2 ng/g
0.4 ng/g
0.4 ng/g
0.5 ng/g
1.0 ng/g
1.1 ng/g
0.7 ng/g
0.4 ng/g
0.4 ng/g
ND
ND
0.3 ng/g
0.5 ng/g
1.9 ng/g
0.7 ng/g
1.3 ng/g
3.0 ng/g
4.5 ng/g
1.7 ng/g
11.8 ng/m3
18.9 ng/m3
28.2 ng/g
52.1 ng/g
DUCT WALL FA
DUCT WALL FA
DUCT WALL FA
DUCT WALL FA
DUCT WALL FA
DUCT WALL FA
DUCT WALL FA
DUCT WALL FA
DUCT BOTTOM FA
DUCT BOTTOM FA
DUCT BOTTOM FA
DUCT BOTTOM FA
DUCT BOTTOM FA
DUCT BOTTOM FA
DUCT BOTTOM FA
DUCT BOTTOM FA
DUCT BOTTOM FA
DUCT BOTTOM FA
COMB . CHAM . ASH
COMB. CHAM. ASH
COMB. CHAM. ASH
COMB. CHAM. ASH
COMB. CHAM. ASH
COMB. CHAM. ASH
COMB. CHAM. ASH
COMB. CHAM. ASH
COMB. CHAM. ASH
COMB. CHAM. ASH
COMB. CHAM. BOTTOM ASH
COMB. CHAM. BOTTOM ASH
COMB. CHAM. BOTTOM ASH
COMB. CHAM. BOTTOM ASH
COMB. CHAM. BOTTOM ASH
COMB. CHAM. BOTTOM ASH
COMB. CHAM. BOTTOM ASH
COMB. CHAM. BOTTOM ASH
COMB. CHAM .BOTTOM ASH
COMB. CHAM. BOTTOM ASH
STACK PART.
STACK PART .
STACK PART.
STACK PART.
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
• GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
                                 B-81
-------
HOSPITAL INCINERATORS
 REF f      ISOMER        ISOMER CONG.

62A/US3      PCDD           4.8 ng/g
62A/US3      PCDF           4.8 ng/g
                                        PROCESSES    SAMPLE     METHOD

                                          STACK      PART.      FILTER
                                          STACK      PART.      FILTER
                                 B-82
-------
WIRE RECLAMATION INCINERATOR
REF f
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
 103
 103
 103
 103
 TCDD
 TCDF
 TCDD
 TCDF
  410 ppt
 11600 ppt
   58 ppt
  730 ppt
  Stack
  Stack
 Furnace
 Furnace
  FA
  FA
  FA
  FA
METHOD
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
                                    B-83
-------
PCB FIRES
 REF #
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG,
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD
158
158
158
158
158
158
192/1/S
192/1/S
192/1/S
192/1/S
192/1/S
192/1/S
192/1/S
192/1/S
192/1/S
192/1/S
192/1/S
192/1/S
192/1/S
192/1/S
218
218
218
218
218
218
218
218
218
218
TCDD
TCDF
2378-TCDF
TCDD
2,3,7,8 TCDD
PCDD/PCDF
2,3,7,8 TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF -
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
2,3,7,8 TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
PCDD
PCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
==========
ND
28.9 ppm
6 . 3 ppm
0.324 ppm
0.059 ppm
ND
20 ng/m2
100 ng/m2
40 ng/m2
40 ng/m2
8 ng/m2
5 ng/m2
100 ng/m2
600 ng/m2
100 ng/m2
60 ng/m2
8 ng/m2
5 ng/m2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.7 ng/g
2.5 ng/g
2.6 ng/g
16 ng/g
13 ng/g
6.4 ng/g
3.4 ng/g
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
In Fire
In Fire
In Fire
In Fire
In Fire
In Fire
Near Fire
Near Fire
Near Fire
Near Fire
Near Fire
Near Fire
Wall (2m)
Bench (10m)
TRANSFORM .
TRANSFORM .
TRANSFORM .
TRANSFORM .
TRANSFORM .
TRANSFORM.
TRANSFORM .
TRANSFORM .
TRANSFORM.
TRANSFORM .
Liquid
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
GS
WIPES

WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
                                B-84
-------
PCS FIRES
 REF §
ssssss::
 99/B1
 ISOMER
:== = = = = =
 OCDF
ISOMER  CONC.
: === ===== = ===:
     ND
99/B2
99/B2
99/B2
99/B2
99/B2
99/B2
99/B3
99/B3
99/B3
99/B3
99/B3
99/B3
99/B4
99/B4
99/B4
99/B4
99/B4
99/B4
99/B5
99/B5
99/B5
99/B5
99/B5
99/B5
99/B6
99/B6
99/B6
99/B6
99/B6
99/B6
110
110
110
110
110
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF - ,
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
PCDF
PCDF
PCDF
PCDF
PCDF
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
280 ng/g
290 ng/g
100 ng/g
ND
ND
0.9-1.1 ppm
75 ppm
27-52 ppm
<0.3 ppm
ND
 PROCESSES
= = = = = = = = = = =
  FIRE
                                          FIRE
                                          FIRE
                                          FIRE
                                          FIRE
                                          FIRE
                                          FIRE

                                          FIRE
                                          FIRE
                                          FIRE
                                          FIRE
                                          FIRE
                                          FIRE

                                          FIRE
                                          FIRE
                                          FIRE
                                          FIRE
                                          FIRE
                                          FIRE

                                          FIRE
                                          FIRE
                                          FIRE
                                          FIRE
                                          FIRE
                                          FIRE

                                          FIRE
                                          FIRE
                                          FIRE
                                          FIRE
                                          FIRE
                                          FIRE

                                       Intact Cap,
                                       In Exp Cap
                                       On Exp Cap
                                          Fence
                                       Pine Need.
SAMPLE
========
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH.
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
Liquid
Liquid
Liquid
Ash
Ash
METHOD
===========
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS-
GS
GS
GS

GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
Scraping
Scraping
GS
  158
 TCDF
  0.127 ppm
   N/A
Liquid
                                                                    GS
                                 B-85
-------
PCB FIRES
 REF *
 ISOMER
ISOMER CONG,
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR •
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SKO
76/SKO
98
98
98
TCDF
2378-TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDF
2378-TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF -
OCDF
TCDF
2378-TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDF
2378-TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF - ,
OCDF
TCDF
2378-TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
PCDF
PCDF
TCDF
TCDD
2,3,7,8 TCDF
— — — — — — — — —
90 ng/m2
22 ng/m2
25 ng/m2
17 ng/m2
17 ng/m2
4 ng/m2
<250 ng/m2
<25 ng/m2
<25 ng/m2
<60 ng/m2
58 ng/m2
17 ng/m2
<250 ng/m2
<25 ng/m2
<25 ng/m2
<60 ng/m2
<30 ng/m2
<12 ng/m2
<20 ng/m2
<4 ng/m2
<10 ng/m2
<12 ng/m2
<15 ng/m2
2 ng/m2
<40 ng/m2
<8 ng/m2
<20 ng/m2
<20 ng/m2
<30 ng/m2
6 ng/m2
.01 ug/m2
.8 ug/m2
N/A
N/A
1.2 ng
S.E., FLOOR
S.E., FLOOR
S.E. ,, FLOOR
S.E.f FLOOR
S . E . , FLOOR
S . E . , FLOOR
OUTSIDE (10m)
OUTSIDE (10m)
OUTSIDE (10m)
OUTSIDE (10m)
OUTSIDE (10m)
OUTSIDE (10m)
OUTSIDE (300m)
OUTSIDE (300m)
OUTSIDE (300m)
OUTSIDE (300m)
OUTSIDE (300m)
OUTSIDE (300m)
AFT.CLEANING(l)
AFT.CLEANING(l)
AFT. CLEANING (1)
AFT.CLEANING(l)
AFT.CLEANING(l)
AFT.CLEANING(l)
AFT.CLEANING(2)
AFT. CLEANING (2)
AFT. CLEANING (2 )'
AFT. CLEANING (2)
AFT.CLEANING(2)
AFT.CLEANING(2)
FOUNDRY
BASEMENT CAPIC.
Capac/Wall
Capac/Walls
Capacitor
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Liquid
Liquid
Soot
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES



 99/B1
 99/B1
 99/B1
 99/B1
 99/B1
2378-TCDF
  TCDF
  P5CDF
  H6CDF
  H7CDF
     ND
  530 ng/g
  1000 ng/g
  180 ng/g
     ND
  FIRE
  FIRE
  FIRE
  FIRE
  FIRE
  ASH
  ASH
  ASH
  ASH
  ASH
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
  GS
                                 B-86
-------
PCB FIRES
 REP
 ISOMER
ISOMER CONG.
   PROCESSES
                  SAMPLE
                           METHOD

60/BOST
60/BOST
60/BOST
60/BOST
60/BOST
60/BOST
60/BING
60/BING
60/BING
60/BING
60/BING
60/BING
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF -
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
3 ug/g
60 ug/g
35 ug/g
15 ug/g
2 ug/g
ND
28 ug/g
12 ug/g
670 ug/g
965 ug/g
460 ug/g
40 ug/g
TRANSFORM
TRANSFORM
TRANSFORM
TRANSFORM
TRANSFORM
TRANSFORM
TRANSFORM
TRANSFORM
TRANSFORM
TRANSFORM
TRANSFORM
TRANSFORM
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
76/SUR
  TCDF
2378-TCDF
  P5CDF
  H6CDF
  H7CDF
  OCDF
  TCDF
2378-TCDF
  P5CDF
  H6CDF
  H7CDF
  OCDF
  TCDF
2378-TCDF
  P5CDF
  H6CDF
  H7CDF
  OCDF
  TCDF
2378-TCDF
  P5CDF
  H6CDF
  H7CDF
  OCDF
  TCDF
2378-TCDF
  P5CDF
  H6CDF
  H7CDF
  OCDF
 4000 ng/m2
  875 ng/m2
 3300 ng/m2
 1800 ng/m2
 1500 ng/m2
  300 ng/m2
 1100 ng/m2
  365 ng/m2
 1250 ng/m2
  940 ng/m2
  625 ng/m2
  145 ng/m2
 1250 ng/m2
  300 ng/m2
  355 ng/m2
  150 ng/m2
  65 ng/m2
  13 ng/m2
  480 ng/m2
  120 ng/m2
  210 ng/m2
  140 ng/m2
  60 ng/m2
  30 ng/m2
  100 ng/m2
  25 ng/m2
  27 ng/m2
  15 ng/m2
   5 ng/m2
   2 ng/m2
Capicit.
Capicit.
Capicit.
Capicit.
Capicit.
Capicit.
Capicit.
Capicit.
Capicit.
Capicit.
Capicit.
Capicit,
         (1)
         (1)
         (1)
         (1)
         (1)
         (1)
         (2)
         (2)
         (2)
         (2)
         (2)
         (2)
N.E.CORNER(10m)
N.E.CORNER(10m)
N.E.CORNER(10m)
N.E.CORNER(10m)
N.E.CORNER(10m)
N.E.CORNER(10m)
S.E.CORNER(10m)
S.E.CORNER(10m)
S.E.CORNER(10m)
S.E.CORNER(10m)
S.E.CORNER(lOm)
S.E.CORNER(10m)
  N.E., FLOOR
        FLOOR
        FLOOR
        FLOOR
        FLOOR
N.E. ,
N,E,,
N.E.,
N.E.,
N.E. ,
        FLOOR
SOOT
SOOT
SOOT
SOOT
SOOT
SOOT
SOOT
SOOT
SOOT
SOOT
SOOT
SOOT
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
SOOt
Soot
Soot
Soot
SOOt
SOOt
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
Soot
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
" WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
WIPES
                                 B-87
-------
AUTOMOBILE EMISSIONS
 REF t
 62/1
 62/1
 62/1
 62/1
 62/1

 62/2
 62/2
 62/2
 62/2
 62/2

 62/5
 62/5
 62/5
 62/5
 62/5

 62/6
 62/6
 62/6
 62/6
 62/6

 62/7
 62/7
 62/7
 62/7
 62/7

*213/W1
*213/W1
*213/W2
*213/W2
*213/W3
*213/W3
*213/W4
*213/W4
   ISOMER
2,3,7,8 TCDD
    TCDD
   H6CDD
   H7CDD
    OCDD

2,3,7,8 TCDD
    TCDD
   H6CDD
   H7CDD -
    OCDD

2,3,7,8 TCDD
    TCDD
   H6CDD
   H7CDD
    OCDD

2,3,7,8 TCDD
    TCDD
   H6CDD
   H7CDD  -
    OCDD

2,3,7,8 TCDD
    TCDD
   H6CDD
   H7CDD
    OCDD

2,3,7,8 TCDD
    TCDD
2,3,7,8 TCDD
    TCDD
2,3,7,8 TCDD
    TCDD
2,3,7,8 TCDD
    TCDD
ISOMER CONC.
     ND
  4.0 ppt
     ND
     ND
   16 ppt

     ND
  0.1 ppt
     ND
     ND
     ND
   14 ppt
   68 ppt

  3.0 ppt
   20 ppt
   20 ppt
  100 ppt
  260 ppt

     ND
     ND
     ND
  110 ppt
  280 ppt

     ND
     ND
    2 ng
   36 ng
  0.23 ng
   6.5 ng
  0.15 ng
   4.3 ng
'ROCESSES
MUFFLER
MUFFLER
MUFFLER
MUFFLER
MUFFLER
MUFFLER
MUFFLER
MUFFLER
MUFFLER
MUFFLER_
MUFFLER
MUFFLER
MUFFLER
MUFFLER
MUFFLER
MUFFLER
MUFFLER
MUFFLER
MUFFLER
MUFFLER
MUFFLER
MUFFLER
MUFFLER
MUFFLER
MUFFLER
MUFFLER
MUFFLER
MUFFLER
MUFFLER
MUFFLER
MUFFLER
MUFFLER
MUFFLER
SAMPLE
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
FILTER
METHOD
SCRAPING
SCRAPING
SCRAPING
SCRAPING
SCRAPING
SCRAPING
SCRAPING
SCRAPING
SCRAPING
SCRAPING
SCRAPING
SCRAPING
SCRAPING
SCRAPING
SCRAPING
SCRAPING
SCRAPING
SCRAPING
SCRAPING
SCRAPING
SCRAPING
SCRAPING
SCRAPING
SCRAPING
SCRAPING
EXTRACT
EXTRACT
EXTRACT
EXTRACT
EXTRACT
EXTRACT
EXTRACT
EXTRACT
                                B-88
-------
THERMAL ACTIVATED  CARBON REGENERATION
 REF f
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG.
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD
13/1
13/1
13/1
13/1
13/1
13/1
13/1
13/1
13/1
13/1
13/1
13/1
1 Q / 1
lo/ J.
11/1
1-1/1
1 J/ J.
13/1
13/1
13/1
13/1
13/1
13/1
13/1
13/1
13/1
13/2
13/2
13/2
13/2
13/2
13/2
13/2
13/2
13/2
13/2
13/2
13/2
1 
-------
THERMAL ACTIVATED CARBON REGENERATION
 REF #
ISOMER
ISOMER CONC.
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD
13/2
13/2
13/2
13/2
13/3
13/3
13/3
13/3
13/3
13/3
13/3
13/3
13/3
13/3
13/3
13/3
i •* /•*
i j / j
13/3
n/ •*
/ -5
13/3
13/3
13/3
13/3
13/3
13/3
13/3
13/3
13/3
13/4
13/4
13/4
13/4
13/4
13/4
13/4
13/4
13/4
13/4
13/4
13/4
1 0 / A
1 J / *t
13/4
1 ^ / L.
ij/t
13/4
2378-TCDD
TCDD
2378-TCDF
TCDF
2378-TCDD
TCDD
2378-TCDF
TCDF
2378-TCDD
TCDD
2378-TCDF
TCDF
2378-TCDD
TCDD
2378-TCDF
TCDF
9^7 R— Tpnn
4&O / O L \^if U
TCDD
007 Q_TP'n'fi1
£3 1 Ol.lil/£
TCDF
2378-TCDD
TCDD
2378-TCDF
TCDF
2378-TCDD
TCDD
2378-TCDF
TCDF
2378-TCDD
TCDD
2378-TCDF
TCDF
2378-TCDD
TCDD
2378-TCDF
TCDF
2378-TCDD
TCDD
2378-TCDF
TCDF
0^7 Q—VpnTi
4. j / o — 1 \>uu
TCDD
•> ^ 7 B-.TPTMT
f. J 1 O — 1 \i\lc
TCDF
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.01 ng/dscm
0.06 ng/dscm
ND
0.40 ng/dscm
4.3 ng/g
37.3 ng/g
ND
245.3 ng/g
0.01 ppb
4.1 ppb
1.7 ppb
2.1 ppb
wn
El U
ND
wn
a U
ND
0.06 ppb
- , 0.1 ppb
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.13 ng/dscm
0.13 ng/dscm
0.06 ng/dscm
0.26 ng/dscm
35.5 ng/g
35.5 ng/g
17.2 ng/g
72.3 ng/g
ND
1.3 ppb
0.6 ppb
0.8 ppb
WTI
au
ND
MT>
HU
ND
QUENCH
QUENCH
QUENCH
QUENCH
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
CYCLONE
CYCLONE
CYCLONE
CYCLONE


— .__-


	 __
SCRUBBER
SCRUBBER
SCRUBBER
SCRUBBER
QUENCH
QUENCH
QUENCH
QUENCH
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
CYCLONE
CYCLONE
CYCLONE
CYCLONE


	


-._ 	
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
FG
FG
FG
FG
PART.
PART.
PART.
PART .
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
•FT? T? T\
r Jc.£iJJ
FEED
V TT VT\
r ciEtu
FEED
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
FG
FG
FG
FG
PART .
PART.
PART .
PART.
ASH
ASH
ASH
ASH
VWT\
C E*JZ»U
FEED
WVT\
e CiCiU
FEED
GS
GS
GS
GS
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
GS
GS
GS
GS
/-I Q
(jo
GS
r* G
l?o
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
GS
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
GS
GS
GS
GS
PC
VjO
GS
PC
-------
THERMAL ACTIVATED CARBON REGENERATION
 REF
ISOMER
ISOMER CONC.
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
13/4
13/4
13/4
13/4
13/4
13/4
13/4
13/4
156/1
156/1
156/1
156/1
156/1
156/1
156/1
156/1
156/1
156/1
156/1
156/1
156/1
156/1
156/1
156/1
156/1
156/1
156/1
156/1
156/1
156/1
156/1
156/1
156/2
156/2
156/2
156/2
156/2
156/2
156/2
156/2
156/2
156/2
156/2
2378-TCDD
TCDD
2378-TCDF
TCDF
2378-TCDD
TCDD
2378-TCDF
TCDF
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDB
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3.12 ng/dscm
ND
ND
ND
ND
.091 ng/dscm
.50 ng/dscm
. , ND
.052 ng/dscm
.044 ng/dscm
ND
ND
ND
ND
.094 ng/dscm
ND
.034 ng/dscm
.20 ng/dscm
0.17 ng/dscm
ND
ND
-
—
-
-
ND
ND
-
—
-
SCRUBBER
SCRUBBER
SCRUBBER
SCRUBBER
QUENCH
QUENCH
QUENCH
QUENCH
RECUP.
RECUP.
RECUP .
RECUP.
RECUP .
RECUP.
RECUP.
RECUP.
RECUP.
RECUP .
RECUP.
RECUP.
RECUP.
RECUP.
RECUP .
RECUP.
RECUP.
RECUP.
RECUP.
RECUP .
RECUP.
RECU-P .
RECUP.
RECUP.
RECUP.
RECUP .
RECUP .
RECUP.
RECUP.
- RECUP.
RECUP.
RECUP.
RECUP.
RECUP .
RECUP .
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
WATER
PART.
PART.
PART .
PART.
PART.
PART.
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG -
FG
PART .
PART.
PART.
PART.
PART.
PART.
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
PART .
PART.
PART.
PART.
PART .
PART.
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
 METHOD
= = s = sss:
   GS
   GS
   GS
   GS
   GS
   GS
   GS
   GS
                                                                   MM5T
                                                                   MM5T
                                                                   MM5T
                                                                   MM5T
                                                                   MM5T
                                                                   MM5T
                                                                   MM5T
                                                                   MM5T
                                                                   MM5T
                                                                   MM5T
                                                                   MM5T
                                                                   MM5T
                                                                   MM5T
                                                                   MM5T
                                                                   MM5T
                                                                   MM5T
                                                                   MM5T
                                                                   MM5T
                                                                   MM5T
                                                                   MM5T
                                                                   MM5T
                                                                   MM5T
                                                                   MM5T
                                                                   MM5T

                                                                   MM5T
                                                                   MM5T
                                                                   MM5T
                                                                   MM5T
                                                                   MM5T
                                                                   MM5T
                                                                   MM5T
                                                                   MM5T
                                                                   MM5T
                                                                   MM5T
                                                                   MM5T
                                      B-91
-------
THERMAL ACTIVATED  CARBON  REGENERATION
 REF #
LSOMER
156/2
156/2
156/2
156/2
156/2
156/2
156/2
156/2
156/2
156/2
156/2
156/2
156/2
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
OCDD
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDD
ISOMER CONC .
                               ND
                               ND
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD
                               ND
                          .015 ng/dscm
                               ND
                               ND
                               ND
                               •ND
                               ND
                               ND
                          .015 ng/dscm
                          .17 ng/dscm
                               ND
                               ND
RECUP . -
RECUP .
RECUP .
RECUP .
RECUP.
RECUP .
RECUP.
RECUP.
RECUP.
RECUP .
RECUP.
RECUP.
RECUP .
FG
PART.
PART.
PART.
PART .
PART.
PART.
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
                               ND
                              AFTERBURN.
                              AFTERBURN.
                              AFTERBURN.
                              AFTERBURN.
                              AFTERBURN.
                              AFTERBURN.
                              AFTERBURN.
                              AFTERBURN.
                              AFTERBURN.
                              AFTERBURN.
                              AFTERBURN.
                              AFTERBURN.
                              AFTERBURN.
                              AFTERBURN.
                              AFTERBURN.
                              AFTERBURN.
                              AFTERBURN.
                              AFTERBURN.
                              AFTERBURN.
                              AFTERBURN.
                              AFTERBURN.
                              AFTERBURN.
                              AFTERBURN.
                              AFTERBURN.

                                STACK
                                STACK
                                STACK
                                STACK
                                STACK
                                STACK
                                STACK
PART .
PART.
PART.
PART .
PART .
PART.
FG)
FG)
FG)
FG)
FG)
FG)
PART.
PART .
PART .
PART.
PART .
PART.
FG)
FG)
FG)
FG)
FG)
FG)
PART.
PART .
PART .
PART.
PART.
PART.
FG
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T.
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
                                     B-92
-------
THERMAL ACTIVATED CARBON REGENERATION
 REF #
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG.
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/3
156/4
156/4
156/4
156/4
156/4
156/4
156/4
156/4
156/4
156/4
156/4
156/4
156/4
156/4
156/4
156/4
156/4
156/4
156/4
156/4
156/4
156/4
156/4
156/4
156/5
156/5
156/5
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P 5.CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
ND
-
-
-
-
'ND
ND
-
-
-
-
.018 ng/dscm
.10 ng/dscm
-
—
—
-
ND
ND
• . _
—
» . —
—
ND
.012 ng/dscm
-
-
-
-
ND
ND
-
—
-
—
.049 ng/dscm
.39 ng/dscm
-
-
-
-
ND
ND
ND
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
PART .
PART.
PART.
PART.
PART ,
PART.
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
PART.
PART*
PART .
PART.
PART.
PART.
FG)
FG)
FG)
FG)
FG)
FG)
PART.
PART.
PART.
PART.
PART.
PART.
FG)
FG)
FG)
FG)
FG)
FG)
PART.
PART.
PART.
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T •
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
                                      B-93
-------
THERMAL ACTIVATED CARBON REGENERATION
 REF #
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG.
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
156/5
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
ND
.27 ng/dscm
.98 ng/dscm
ND
ND
ND
ND
.024 ng/dscm
.12 ng/dscm
ND
ND
.015 ng/dscm
.035 ng/dscm
.073 ng/dscm
.048 ng/dscm
.021 ng/dscm
.098 ng/dscm
.044 ng/dscm
.029 ng/dscm
.018 ng/dscm
.012 ng/dscm
ND
ND
ND
ND
.17 ng/dscm
1 .06-7 ng/dscm
ND
ND
ND
ND
„ 12ng/dscm
.22 ng/dscm
ND
ND
ND
.0070 ng/dscm
.021 ng/dscm
.018 ng/dscm
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
AFTERBURN.
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
STACK
PART.
PART.
PART .
FG)
FG)
FG)
FG)
FG)
FG)
PART.
PART.
PART.
PART.
PART .
PART .
FG)
FG)
FG)
FG)
FG)
FG)
PART .
PART.
PART.
PART.
PART.
PART.
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
PART.
PART .
PART .
PART.
PART .
PART.
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
                                    B-94
-------
THERMAL ACTIVATED CARBON REGENERATION
 REF #
ISOMER
ISOMER CONC.
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD
156/6
156/6
156/6
156/6
156/6
156/6
156/6
156/6
156/6
156/6
156/6
156/6
156/6
156/6
156/6
156/6
156/6
156/6
156/6
156/6
156/6
156/6
156/6
156/6
156/7
156/7
156/7
156/7
156/7
156/7
156/7
156/7
156/7
156/7
156/7
156/7
156/7
156/7
156/7
156/7
156/7
156/7
156/7
156/7
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
2378-TCDD-
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD'
H7CDD
OCDD
2378-TCDF
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
2378-TCDF
TCDF
ND
ND
ND
ND
.23ng/dscm
1.38 ng/dscm
ND
.006 ng/dscm
.13 ng/dscm
.37 ng/dscm
.23 ng/dscm
.23 ng/dscm
ND
ND
.0070 ng/dscm
ND
ND
.37 ng/dscm
.016 ng/dscm
1.4 ng/dscm
1.1 ng/dscm
,76 ng/dscm
.76 ng/dscm
.35 ng/dscm
ND
ND'
-
-
-
-
ND
.090 ng/dscm
-
—
-
—
ND
'.010 ng/dscm
-
-
-
—
ND
.088 ng/dscm
RECUP.
RECUP.
RECDP .
RECUP.
RECUP .
RECUP.
RECUP .
RECUP .
RECUP.
RECUP.
RECUP .
RECUP .
RECUP .
RECUP .
RECUP.
RECUP.
RECUP .
RECUP .
RECUP.
RECUP.
RECUP .
RECUP.
RECUP.
RECUP.
RECUP.
RECUP.
RECUP.
RECUP.
RECUP .
RECUP .
RECUP.
RECUP .
RECUP .
RECUP.
RECUP .
RECUP.
RECUP .
RECUP.
RECUP.
RECUP .
RECUP .
RECUP.
RECUP.
RECUP .
PART.
PART.
PART.
PART.
PART.
PART .
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
PART.
PART .
PART .
PART.
PART .
PART .
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
PART .
PART.
PART.
PART..
PART .
PART.
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
PART .
PART.
PART.
PART.
PART.
PART.
FG
FG
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
MM5T
                                      B-95
-------
THERMAL ACTIVATED CARBON REGENERATION
 REF #
 r s= s=s= = =i:
 156/7
 156/7
 156/7
 156/7
 ISOMER
: = = = = =» = :
 P5CDF
 H6CDF
 H7CDF
 OCDF
ISOMER CONC
 PROCESSES
= = 35 = ss=2:=s = = :
   RECDP .
   RECUP .
   RECDP.
   RECUP.
 SAMPLE
= = a==3 = = =3 =
   FG
   FG
   FG
   FG
METHOD

 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
 MM5T
                                     B-96
-------
EXPERIMENTAL
REF #
ISOMER
ISOMER CONC.
PROCESSES
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
34
3 6 /A
36/A
36/A
36/A
36/B
36/B
36/B
36/B
36/C
36/C
36/C
36/C
36/C
37
62
62
62
62
111 /A
Ill/A
Ill/A
Ill/A
Ill/A
111/B
111/B
111/B
111/B
111/B
111/C
111/C
111/C
TCDD
TCDF
P5CDD
P5CDF
H6CDD
H6CDF
H7CDF
H7CDD
OCDD
OCDF
TCDF
TCDF
TCDF
TCDF
TCDF
TCDF
TCDF
TCDF
TCDF
TCDF
TCDF
TCDF
TCDF
PCDF
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
H6CDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
84 ng/samp.
484 ng/samp.
247 ng/samp.
1710 ng/samp .
370 ng/samp .
1815 ng/samp .
1105 ng/samp.
240 ng/samp .
45 ng/samp.
295 ng/samp .
<0.02 %
0.25%
0.60 %
<0.02 %
0.35 %
<0.01 %
<0.01%
0.5%
0.3%
0.2%
1.6 %
<0.1%
<0.1%
0.1% - severa 1 %
8.5, 9.0 pg/cigarett
50, 18 pg/cigarette
ND
8.0, 4.2 pg/cigarett
70 ug/g
35 ug/g
4 ug/g
2.4 ug/g
2 ug/g
53 ug/g
98 ug/g
155 ug/g
46 ug/g
3.5 ug/g
0.6 ug/g
0.4 ug/g
0.8 ug/g
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
• N/A
N/A
SAMPLE
                                                         FG
                                                         FG
                                                         FG
                                                         FG
                                                         FG
                                                         FG
                                                         FG
                                                         FG
                                                         FG
                                                         FG

                                                         FG
                                                         FG
                                                         FG
                                                         FG
                                                         FG
                                                         FG
                                                         FG
                                                         FG
                                                         FG
                                                         FG
                                                         FG
                                                         FG
                                                         FG

                                                         FG

                                                       SMOKE
                                                       SMOKE
                                                       SMOKE
                                                       SMOKE
METHOD
                                                        N/A
                                                        N/A
                                                        N/A
                                                        N/A
                                                        N/A
                                                        N/A
                                                        N/A
                                                        N/A
                                                        N/A
                                                        N/A

                                                        N/A
                                                        N/A
                                                        N/A
                                                        N/A
                                                        N/A
                                                        N/A
                                                        N/A
                                                        N/A
                                                        N/A
                                                        N/A
                                                        N/A
                                                        N/A
                                                        N/A

                                                        N/A

                                                       FILTER
                                                       FILTER
                                                       FILTER
                                                       FILTER
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
GLASS
GLASS
GLASS
GLASS
GLASS
GLASS
GLASS
GLASS
GLASS
GLASS
GLASS
GLASS
GLASS
WOOL
WOOL
WOOL
WOOL
WOOL
WOOL
WOOL
WOOL
WOOL
WOOL
WOOL
WOOL
WOOL
                                     B-97
-------
EXPERIMENTAL
REF #
ISOMER
111/C
111/C
111/D
111/D
111/D
111/D
111/D
145/A
145/A
145/A
145/A
.L4-5./A.-
145/A
145/A
145/A
145/A
145/A
145/B
145/B
145/B
145/B
145/B
145/B
145/B
145/B
145/B
145/B
145/C
145/C
145/C
145/C
145/C
145/C
145/C
145/C
145/C
145/C
146
149/1
149/1
149/1
149/1
149/2
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
TCDD
P5CDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDF
P5CDF
H6CDF
H7CDF
OCDF
PCDD/PCDF
TCDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
ISOMER CONG

  0.4 ug/g
  0.7 ug/g
  o .2 ug/g
   * ug/g
  1.6 ug/g
  4.6 ug/g
  5.2 ug/g

   TRACE
  101 ug/g
  90 ug/g
  28 ug/g
  80 ug/g
   TRACE
   TRACE
   TRACE
  28 ug/g
  38 ug/g
   TRACE
  62 ug/g
   2 ug/g
   6 ug/g
 , 25 ug/g
   TRACE
   TRACE
   TRACE
  10 ug/g
   6 ug/g
  47 ug/g
  40 ug/g
  44 ug/g
  15 ug/g
    N/A
  74 ug/g
  62 ug/g
  16 ug/g
  15 ug/g
    N/A

    N/A  ~

     ND
     ND
     ND
     ND
     ND
 PROCESSES
: = = = = = = = = = :
   N/A
   N/A
   N/A
   N/A
   N/A
   N/A
   N/A

   N/A
   -N/A
   N/A
   N/A
   N/A
   N/A
   N/A
   N/A
   N/A
   N/A
   N/A
   N/A
   N/A
   N/A
   N/A
   N/A
   N/A
   N/A
   N/A
   N/A
   N/A
   N/A
   N/A
   N/A
   N/A
   N/A
   N/A
   N/A
   N/A
   N/A

   N/A

   N/A
   N/A
   N/A
   N/A
   N/A
                                                      SAMPLE
                                                      METHOD
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
GLASS WOOL
GLASS WOOL
GLASS WOOL
GLASS WOOL
GLASS WOOL
GLASS WOOL
GLASS WOOL
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
                                                        FG

                                                       Feed
                                                       Feed
                                                       Feed
                                                       Feed
                                                       Feed
                                                       N/A
                                                    Wool
                                                    Wool
                                                    Wool
                                                    Wool
                                                    Wool
Trap
Trap
Trap
Trap
Trap
                                     B-98
-------
EXPERIMENTAL
REF
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG.
PROCESSES
SAMPLE
METHOD
149/2
149/2
149/2
149/3
149/3
149/3
149/3
149/4
149/4
149/4
149/4
149/5
149/5
149/5
149/5
149/6
149/6
149/6
149/6
149/7
149/7
149/7
149/7
200/A
200/A
200/A
200/A
200/A
200/A
200/A
200/A
200/A
200/A
200/B
200/B
200/B
200/B
200/B
200/B
200/B
200/B
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
TCDD
H6CDD
H7CDD
OCDD
T4CDD/T4CDF
P5CDD/P5CDF
H6CDD/H6CDF
H7CDD/H7CDF
OCDD/OCDF
T4CDD/T4CDF
P5CDD/P5CDF
H6CDD/H6CDF
H7CDD/H7CDF
OCDD/OCDF
T4CDD/T4CDF
P5CDD/P5CDF
H6CDD/H6CDF
H7CDD/H7CDF
OCDD/OCDF
T4CDD/T4CDF
P5CDD/P5CDF
H6CDD/H6CDF
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.6 ng/g feed
. 1.3 ng/g feed
ND
ND
0.5 ng/g feed
2.7 ng/g feed
1.4 ng/g feed
8.4 ng/g feed
25 ng/g feed
64 ng/g geed
1.2 ng/g feed
29 ng/g feed
91 ng/g feed
, 29,0 ng/g feed
95 mg/kg
108 mg/kg
146 mg/kg
52 mg/kg
14 mg/kg
N/A
65 mg/kg
153 mg/kg
74 mg/kg
27 mg/kg
60 mg/kg
"400 mg/kg
2500 mg/kg
1500 mg/kg
250 mg/kg
4 mg/kg
20 mg/kg
100 mg/kg
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
. N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
LAB FURN
LAB FURN
LAB FURN
LAB FURN
LAB FURN
LAB FURN
LAB FURN
LAB FURN
LAB FURN
LAB FURN
LAB FURN
LAB FURN
LAB FURN
LAB FURN
LAB FURN
LAB FURN
LAB FURN
LAB FURN
Feed
Feed
Feed
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
Wool Trap
Wool .Trap
Wool Trap
Wool Trap
Wool Trap
Wool Trap
Wool Trap
Wool Trap
Wool Trap
Wool Trap
Wool Trap
Wool Trap
Wool Trap
Wool Trap
Wool Trap
Wool Trap
Wool Trap
Wool Trap
Wool Trap
Wool Trap
Wool Trap
Wool Trap
Wool Trap
METH. TRAP
METH. TRAP
METH. TRAP
METH. TRAP
METH. TRAP
METH. TRAP
METH. TRAP
METH. TRAP
METH. TRAP
METH. TRAP
METH. TRAP
METH. TRAP
METH. TRAP
METH. TRAP
METH. TRAP
METH. TRAP
METH. TRAP
METH. TRAP
                                    B-99
-------
EXPERIMENTAL
REF #
ISOMER
ISOMER CONG
PROCESSES   SAMPLE    METHOD
200/B
200/B
200/B
200/B
200/B
200/B
200/B
200/C
200/C
200/C
200/C
200/C
200/C
200/C
200/C
200/C
200/C
200/C
200/C
200/C
200/C
200/C
200/D
200/D
200/D
200/D
200/D
200/D
200/D
200/D
200/D
200/D
H7CDD/H7CDF
OCDD/OCDF
T4CDD/T4CDF
P5CDD/P5CDF
H6CDD/H6CDF
H7CDD/H7CDF
OCDD/OCDF
T4CDD/T4CDF
P5CDD/P5CDF
H6CDD/H6CDF
H7CDD/H7CDF
OCDD/OCDF
T4CDD/T4CDF
P5CDD/P5CDF
H6CDD/H6CDF
H7CDD/H7CDF
OCDD/OCDF
T4CDD/T4CDF
P5CDD/P5CDF
H6CDD/H6CDF
H7CDD/H7CDF
OCDD/OCDF
' T4CDD/T4CDF
P5CDD/P5CDF
H6CDD/H6CDF
H7CDD/H7CDF
OCDD/OCDF
T4CDD/T4CDF
P5CDD/P5CDF
H6CDD/H6CDF
H7CDD/H7CDF
OCDD/OCDF
105 mg/kg
20 mg/kg
0.6 mg/kg
3.5 mg/kg
40 mg/kg
75 mg/kg
15 mg/kg
60 mg/kg
650 mg/kg
3300 mg/kg
3400 mg/kg
60 mg/kg
39 mg/kg
47 mg/kg
450 mg/kg
200 mg/kg
35 mg/kg
2 mg/kg
2 mg/kg
'150 mg/kg
130 mg/kg
25 mg/kg
50 mg/kg
85 mg/kg
C220 mg/kg
230 mg/kg
45 mg/kg
1 .4 mg/kg
3.9 mg/kg
20 mg/kg
15 mg/kg
2.1 mg/kg
LAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
LAB
FURN
FURN
FURN
FURN
FURN
FURN
FURN
FURN
FURN
FURN
FURN
FURN
FURN
FURN
FURN
FURN
FURN
FURN
FURN
FURN
FURN
FURN
FURN
FURN
FURN
FURN
FURN
FURN
FURN
FURN
FURN
FURN
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
FG
METH.
METH.
METH.
METH.
METH.
METH.
METH.
METH.
METH.
METH.
METH.
METH.
METH.
METH.
METH.
METH.
METH.
METH.
METH.
METH.
METH.
METH.
METH .
METH.
METH.
METH.
METH.
METH.
METH.
METH.
METH.
METH.
TRAP
TRAP
TRAP
TRAP
TRAP
TRAP
TRAP
TRAP
TRAP
TRAP
TRAP
TRAP
TRAP
TRAP
TRAP
TRAP
TRAP
TRAP
TRAP
TRAP
TRAP
TRAP
TRAP
TRAP
TRAP
TRAP
TRAP
TRAP
TRAP
TRAP
TRAP
TRAP
 219   2,3,7,8 TCDD
              0.375 ug/g TCP
                   N/A
              FG
Gas Adsorp
 226    PCDD/PCDF
 226       TCDD
                    ND
               21 ng/g wood
                   N/A
                   N/A
              FG    XAD-2 Trap
              FG    XAD-2 Trap
                                   B-100
-------
EXPERIMENTAL
REF #      ISOMER
siiBaiHaiKaaBsaxaisscsaiKs:
 226    2,3,7,8 TCDD
  ISOMER CONC.
I3I3» = = = = = = := = = 3!3«:

 0.6 ng/g wood
 PROCESSES
EKSKBSSEaSS:

    N/A
SAMPLE     METHOD

  FG    XAD-2 Trap
                                      B-101
-------
        APPENDIX C



DATA BASE REFERENCE TABLES
-------
-------
                             APPENDIX C
                     DATA BASE REFERENCE TABLES

Municipal Waste Combustors	C-2
Sewage Sludge Incinerators	  C-ll
Fossil Fuel Combustion	C-12
Wood Combustion	C-14
Boilers Cofiring Wastes ..... 	  C-17
Hazardous Waste Incinerators	  C-20
Lime/Cement Kilns 	  C-24
Hospital Incinerators ..... 	  C-25
Wire Reclamation Incinerator. . .	C-26
PCB Fires	c_27
Automobile Emissions	C-29
Thermal Activated Carbon Regeneration 	  C-30
Experimental	t	C_3
-------
-------
     The following information is further background information regarding the
dioxin concentration data contained in Appendix B.

                       MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTORS

Reference #12
     Facility Location:  West Germany MIP, West Germany Power Plant
     Incinerator Characteristic:  N/A
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  N/A
     Extraction:  To!uene/Methanol
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  MSW
     Sampling Organization:  University of Ulm, Germany

Reference #25
     Facility Location:  Florence
     Incinerator Characteristic:  3 simultaneously operating furnaces: feed
                                  capacity 450 tons/day.  Operation under
                                  isokinetic conditions.
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  3 Fume Samples;
                                      1 Precipitated Fly Ash Sample
     Extraction:  Continuously extracted by Soxhlet/Toluene
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  MSW
     Sampling Organization:  Institute Inguinamento Atmosferico 1 Rome
                            'Laboratorio Provincial Igiene e Profilassi/MiIan
                               /Firenze

Reference #26
     Facility Location:  Europe
     Incinerator Characteristic:
          5 tests using Inc. after compost production
          5 tests using Inc. without any treatment
          5 tests using Inc. after recycling
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  N/A
     Extraction:  To!uene/Methanol
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  MSW
     Sampling Organization:  Institute Inguinamento Atmosferico 1 Rome,  CNR

Reference #32
     Facility Location:  Albany, NY
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Natural  Gas Supplemental  Fuel  600 tons/day
                                  Temp. -  390°F
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  3 tests/48 hours
     Extraction:  Soxhlet
     Analysis Technique:  GC/HRMS
     Precursors Present:  MSW
     Sampling Organization:  N/A
                                    C-2
-------
Reference #33
    •Facility Location:  Zurich, Switzerland
     Incinerator Characteristic:  N/A
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  N/A
     Extraction:  Methylene Chloride
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  Mun. & Ind. S.W.
     Sampling Organization:  Swiss Federal Research Station

Reference #43
     Facility location:  Italy
     Incinerator Characteristic:  N/A
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  N/A
     Extraction:  Hexane
     Analysis Technique:  HRGC/MS
     Precursors Present:  MSW                                            ,„,	
     Sampling Organization:  Lab. Prov. di Igiene e Prof.

Reference #44
     Facility Location:  N/A
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Modern heat recovery incinerator
                                  Modular controlled air incinerator
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  N/A
     Extraction:  Hexane
     Analysis Technique:  HRGC/LRMS
     Precursors Present:  MSW, PCP treated wood, PCB, Coal
     Sampling Organization:  Laboratory Services Division,  Environment Canada

Reference #47
     Facility Location:  Ontario
     Incinerator Characteristic:  N/A
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  7
     Extraction:  Soxhlet (16 hr.)
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  MSW
     Sampling Organization:  Ministry of The Environment, Ontario, Canada

Reference #49
     Facility Location:  Charlottetown, Ontario
     Incinerator Characteristic:  3 tests. (PT2-PT4) done under normal
                                  conditions; 3 tests (PT5-7) done under Long
                                  Cycle; 3 tests (PT8-10) done under high temp;
                                  3 tests (PT11-13) done under low temp.
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  N/A
     Extraction:  N/A
     Analysis Technique:  N/A
     Precursors Present:  MSW
     Sampling Organization:  Concord Scientific Corporation
                                     C-3
-------
Reference #51
     Facility Location:  Tsushima, Japan
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Dry scrubbing and Fabric filter system
     .   _.   „,..,,,           Reverse Reciprocating Grate Incinerators
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  4 sample points
     Extraction:  N/A
     Analysis Technique:  N/A
     Precursors Present:  MSW
     Sampling Organizaiton:  Ministry of the Environment, Ontario, Canada
                             California Air Resource Board, USA

Reference #69
     Facility Location:  Ontario, Canada
     Incinerator Characteristic:  N/A
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  8 weeks/3 rep.
     Extraction:  Soxhlet/Benzene (16 hour)
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  MSW
     Sampling Organization:  Ministry of the Environment, Ontario, Canada

Reference #70
     Facility Location:  Ontario, Canada
     Incinerator Characteristic:  N/A
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  5 replications
     Extraction:  Ultrasonic/Benzene (1 hr)      .
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  MSW
     Sampling Organization:  Ministry of the Environment, Ontario, Canada

Reference #71
     Facility Location:  1 & 2/Japan, 3/Netherlands, 4 & 5/Ontario
     Incinerator Characteristic:  N/A
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  1 sample
     Extraction:  Soxhlet/Benzene
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  MSW
     Sampling Organization:  1  & 2/University of Kyoto
                             3/University of Amsterdam
                             4  & 5/Ministry of the  Environment,  Ontario,  Canada
                                     C-4
-------
Reference #87
     Facility location:  Como, Italy
     Incinerator Characteristic:  >500 degrees C
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  17 samples/9 months
     Extraction:  Hexane
     Analysis Technique:  6C/MS
     Precursors Present:  MSW
     Sampling Organization:  Institute for Pharmacological Research
                             Milan, Italy

Reference #90
     Facility Location:  Municipal Incinerator/U.S.A.
     Incinerator Characteristic:  N/A
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  1 sample
     Extraction:  N/A
     Analysis Technique:  GC/HRMS
     Precursors Present:  MSW
     Sampling Organization:  University of Nebraska

Reference #92
   1  Facility Location:  Hampton, VA, U.S.A.
     Incinerator Characteristic:  N/A
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  N/A
     Extraction:  N/A
     Analysis Technique:  6C/MS
     Precursors Present:  MSW
     Sampling Organization:  Midwest Research Institute

Reference #97
     Facility Location:  U.S.A.
     Incinerator Characteristic:  N/A
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  5 samples
     Extraction:  N/A
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  MSW
     Sampling Organization:  U.S. EPA
Reference #100
     Facility location:
U.S.A. Facilities
     Incinerator Characteristic:  1 Industrial  Spreader Stoker
                                  1 Incinerator/Boiler
                                  1 Small  Modular
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  2-4  days
     Extraction:  Hexane/KOH
     Analysis Technique:  GC/HRMS
     Precursors Present:  6 samples using  MSW/Waste Oil
                          3 samples using  RDF
                          4 samples using  Processed MSW
     Sampling Organization:  Systech Corporation
                                    C-5
-------
Reference #101
     Facility Location:  U.S.A.
     Incinerator Characteristic:  1 RDF; 1 Mass Burning;
                                  1 Modular (30% Industrial Feed)
     Sampling Schedule/0 of Samples:  3 tests/unit
     Extraction:  Soxhlet/Methylene Chloride
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  MSW
     Sampling Organization:  Battelle-Columbus Laboratories

Reference #109
     Facility location:  Beveren, Belgium
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Domestic/Industrial Wastes
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  12 test
     Extract!on:  N/A
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  PCB's, PCP's
     Sampling Organization:  University of Antwerp

Reference #115
     Facility Location:  N/A
     Incinerator Characteristic:  One plant
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  3-8 samples
     Extraction:  Soxhlet/Methylene Chloride
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  MSW/Coal
     Sampling Organization:  Ames Lab, Iowa State University

Reference #116
     Facility Location:  France
     Incinerator Characteristic:  950 degrees C
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  1 sample
     Extraction:  Ultrasonic/Benzene
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  MSW
     Sampling Organization:  University of Waterloo, Ontario

Reference #118
     Facility Location:  TIRU,  Paris, France
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Feed Rate = 16 tons/hr Energy Recovery
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  2 sets of 3 samples
                                      Incineration without treatment,
                                      Incineration with spiked PVC
     Extraction:   Soxhlet/Benzene
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  Test  1, MSW; Test 2,  MSW & PVC
     Sampling Organization:   Electricite de France--Traitement Industrie!  des
                             Residus Urbains (EDF-TIRU)
                                     C-6
-------
Reference #143
     Facility Location:  Urban Incinerator/Italy
     Incinerator Characteristic:  N/A  -
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  1 sample
     Extraction:  Soxhlet/Benzene
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  MSW/PCB
     Sampling Organization:  Institute Inguinamento Atmosferico,
                                        Rome
Reference #144
     Facility Location:
                         I 1 I I <*IIW

     Incinerator Characteristic
Bologna, Italy
Florence, Italy
Milano, Italy
           Urban
           Rural
3
2
1
                                     Incinerators
                                     Incinerators
                               Recycled Waste
                             2 Incinerators burning waste residue
Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  N/A
             Soxhlet/Xylene
                     GC/MS
                     Urban/Untreated MSW
                     Rural/Ag Products
                     N/A's/Homogenized or processed MSW
Sampling Organization:  Institute Inguinamento Atmosferico, Rome
     Extraction:
     Analysis Technique:
     Precursors Present:
Reference #160                                               - .
     Facility Location:  Hampton, VA, U.S.A.
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Refuse Incinerator-Raw Municipal Waste
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  5 days: 2-6/day
     Extraction:  Soxhlet/Benzene
     Analysis Technique:  HRGC/MS
     Precursors Present:  MSW
     Sampling Organization:  Midwest Research Institute

Reference #168
     Facility Location:  City of Philadelphia, Northwest Units 1 & 2
                         Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
     Incinerator Characteristic:  N/A
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  16 Bottom ash;  16 Fly Ash; 15 Flue Gas
     Extraction:  Soxhlet/Benzene
     Analysis Technique:  HRGC/MS
     Precursors Present:  MSW
     Sampling Organization:  Midwest Research Institute
                                    C-7
-------
Reference #174
     Facility Location:  Hampton, VA., U.S.A.
     Incinerator Characteristic:  1 Converted Coal Boiler
                                  1 Incinerator-Boiler
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  Coal Boilers, 3 tests/2 days
                                      Incin.-Boilers, 3 tests/4 days
     Extraction:  Methanol/Hexane
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  Coal Boilers/RDF
                          Inci n.-Boi1ers/Refuse
     Sampling Organization:  Scott Environmental Services

Reference #178
     Facility location:  Alkamaar, Netherlands
                         Amsterdam, Netherlands
                         Arnhem, Netherlands
                         Leewarden, Netherlands
                         Leiden, Netherlands
                         Rijnmond, Netherlands
                         Roosendaal, Netherlands
                         Rotterdam, Netherlands
                         Zaanstad, Netherlands
     Incinerator Characteristic:  N/A
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:
        .  Alkamaar: 17 samples/1.5 years
          Amsterdam: 14 samples/1.5 years
          Arnhem, Leewarden, Leiden, Rijnmond, Roosendaal & Rotterdam:
            5 months
          Zaanstad: 6 tested at 23 samples/1.5 years
                    10 tested at 10/2 hours
                    10 tested at 14 samples/1.5 years
     Extraction:  Soxhlet/Toluene (24 hr)
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  MSW
     Sampling Organization:  University of Amsterdam

Reference #181
     Facility Location:  SWARA Plant,  Canada
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Traveling Grate Boiler
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  15 runs
     Extraction:  N/A
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  RDF
     Sampling Organization:  Ontario Research Foundation
                                     C-3
-------
Reference #196
     Facility Location:  Chicago NW and Ames, Iowa. U.S.A.
     Incinerator Characteristic:  1 Coal/RDF (1200 C)
                                  1 Raw Municipal Waste (650°C)
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  Coal/RDF 1:10 days
                                      Municipal 1:9 days
     Extraction:  Soxhlet
     Analysis Technique:  HRGC/MS
     Precursors Present:  Raw MSW, 85% Coal/15% RDF
     Sampling Organization:  TRW, Inc.

Reference #202
     Facility Location:  Sincin. (North America)
     Incinerator Characteristic:  N/A
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  5 samples
     Extraction:  Soxhlet
     Analysis Technique:  6C/MS
     Precursors Present:  MSW
     Sampling Organization:  Texas A & M University
                             College of Veterinary Medicine

Reference #203
     Facility Location:  North America
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Municipal Incinerator,
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  Fly ash sample/am  of gaseous material
     Extraction:  Soxhlet
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  MSW
     Sampling Organization:  Texas A&M; University of Amsterdam

Reference *205
     Facility Location:  Hampton, VA,  U.S.A.
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Steamflow - 27,500 Ib/hr
                                  Furnace, temp.  - 1500 F
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  240 min/3 tests
     Extraction:  Hexane/Toluene
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  MSW
     Sampling Organization:  Wright State University

Reference *221
     Facility Location:  KVA,  Zurich-Josefstrasse
     Incinerator Characteristic:  N/A
  •   Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  N/A
     Extraction:  N/A
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  MSW
     Sampling Organization:  Dubendorf, Switzerland F. M.  I.  and E. I.
                                    C-9
-------
Reference #222
     Facility Location:  N/A
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Boiler
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  Tests 3=3 hours
     Extraction:  Soxhlet/Benzene
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  RDF
     Sampling Organization:  Scott Environmental Technology

Reference #225
     Facility Location:  Philadelphia Northwest Incinerator, U.S.A.
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Crane and bin type; two Tynan trash furnaces;
                                  maximum temperature 2100 F.  Average 1500 F
                                  during test.
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  ESP hopper ash samples; single sample
                                      from each furnace for two days.
     Extraction:  Soxhlet/benzene
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  MSW
     Sampling Organization:  Engineering-Science


Reference #228
     Facility Location:  Hempstead, Long Island, U.S.A.
     Incinerator Characteristic:  RDF/Energy Recovery
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  11
     Extraction:  Methylene Chloride
     Analysis Technique:  GC/HRMS
     Precursors Present:  RDF/Biocide
     Sampling Organization:  Wright State University

Reference #243
     Facility Location:  Utility Plant
     Incinerator Characteristic:  N/A
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  N/A
     Extraction:  Soxhlet
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  MSW/Coal
     Sampling Organization:  U.S. Department of Energy
                                    C-10
-------
                          SEWAGE SLUDGE INCINERATORS
Reference #24

     Facility Location:  N/A
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Sludge Incineration
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  6 samples
     Extraction:  Soxhlet/Hexane, dichloromethane, acetone (80:15:5)
     Analysis Technique:  GC
     Precursors Present:  Sewage Sludge
     Sampling Organization:  N/A

Reference #235
     Facility Location:  Ontario
     Incinerator Characteristic:
                             Multiple Hearth Inc. (1000°C).
                              to 15.5 short tons/hr.
Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  3 sample periods
Extraction:  N/A
Analysis Technique:  N/A
Precursors Present:  Sewage Sludge
Sampling Organization:  Ministry of Environment, Ontario, Canada
Feed rate 13
                                    C-ll
-------
                            FOSSIL FUEL COMBUSTION
Reference #5
     Facility Location:  Sweden
     Incinerator Characteristic:  (1) Oil-fired boiler w/o E'SP, (1) Pulverized
                                  Coal-fired boiler w/ESP
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  3 tests oil boiler before ESP
                                      3 tests coal bo'iler after ESP
                                   Samples 1,2,3 = Oil;  Samples 11,12,13 = PC
     Extraction:  Soxhlet
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  Oil or Coal
     Sampling Organization:  N/A
Reference #59
     Facility Location:  N/A
     Incinerator Characteristic:. One Plant
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  1 Sample
     Extraction:  Basic Extraction
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  Coal
     Sampling Organization:  Batelle, Columbus Labs
Reference #62
     Facility Location:  Midland, Michigan, U.S.A.
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Powerhouse
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  N/A
     Extraction:  N/A
     Analysis Technique:  2 samples tested using GC/MS
                          3 samples tested using electron capture GC
     Precursors Present:  Coal and Oil
     Sampling Organization:  Dow Chemical
Reference #93
     Facility Location:  (7) Coal-Fired Utility Plants
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Large pulverized coal-fired boiler
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  5 days
     Extraction:  Soxhlet/Benzene
     Analysis Technique:  HRGC/MS
     Precursors Present:  Coal
     Sampling Organization:  Midwest Research Institute
                                    C-12
-------
Reference #97
     Facility Location:  U.S.
     Incinerator Characteristic:
7 Coal-fired power plants
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  7 Samples
     Extraction:  Soxhlet/Benzene (24 hr)
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  Coal
     Sampling Organization:  U.S. EPA

Reference #125

     Faci1ity Location:   'N/A
     Incinerator Characteristic:  One Plant
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  N/A
     Extraction:  Hexane/Acetone
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  Low Sulfur Coal
     Sampling Organization:  University of California at Davis,  U.S.A
                                    C-13
-------
                                WOOD COMBUSTION
Reference #6
     Facility Location:  Pilot Scale Incinerator
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Treated Wood
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  5 Trials; A - Trichlorophenate
                                        B = Tetrachlorophenate
     Extraction:  N/A
     Analysis Technique:  N/A
     Precursors Present:  Tetrachlorophenolate, trichlorophenolate
     Sampling Organization:  Swedish Water and Air Pollution Research
                             Institute
Reference #7
     Facility Location:  N/A
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Open Fire/Treated Wood
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  8 Experiments
     Extraction:  Basic
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  2,4,5-T
     Sampling Organization:  Swedish Water and Air Pollution Research
                             Institute
Reference #54
     Facility Location:  U.S.A. (6 Sites, Eastern Region)
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Residential  woodstoves
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  N/A   -
     Extraction:  Benzene
     Analysis Technique:  HRGC/LRMS
     Precursors Present:  Wood
     Sampling Organization:  Dow Chemical
Reference #62
     Facility Location:  U.S.A.
     Incinerator Characteristic;
1 25 yr.  old fireplace tested
1 12 yr.  old fireplace tested
1 natural  gas furnace tested
    N/A
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples
     Extraction:  N/A
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  Fireplaces - wood was burned
                Natural  Gas Furnaces - natural  gas was burned
     Sampling Organization:  Dow Chemical
                                     C-14
-------
Reference #165

     Facility Location:  U.S.A. (NH, MN, MI, OR)
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Residential wood combustion
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  NH, 6; MN, 5; MI, 1; OR, 6 (6/region)
     Extraction:  Benzene/Soxhlet
     Analysis Technique:  HRGC/MS
     Precursors Present:  Residential wood
     Sampling Organization:  Dow Chemical
Reference #167
     Facility Location:  1 site tested in Cape Cod, MA
                         1 site tested in Midland, MI
     Incinerator Characteristic:  N/A
     Sampling Schedule/2 of Samples:  N/A
     Extraction:  N/A
                          GC/MS
                          4 samples from Cape Cod burned oil
                          4 samples from Cape Cod burned wood
                          5 samples from Midland burned oil & wood
     Sampling Organization:  Dow Chemical
Analysis Technique
Precursors Present
Reference #179

     Facility Location:  N/A
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Fluidized Bed, 100 kg/hr
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  N/A
     Extraction:  N/A
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  PCP/Hypochlorite
     Sampling Organization:  University of Amsterdam

Reference #190

     Facility Location:  N/A
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Chlorophenate Pyrolysis
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  N/A
     Extraction:  Soxhlet/Methylene Chloride
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  Servarex/Birch leaves, Servarex/wood wool,  Kymmene
                          (KY-5)/Birch leaves, Pentachlorophenate,  2,4,6-Tri-
                          chlorophenate
     Sampling Organization:  University of Umea, Sweden
                                    C-15
-------
                 Processor,  Small
                 Ib/hr
Reference #233

     Facility Location:  Tooele Army Depot
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Contaminated Waste
                                  Feed loading = 400
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  5 hours
     Extraction:  Soxhlet/Benzene
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  PCP-coated ammunition boxes, explosive contaminated
                          waste, PCP-coated wood, ammunition boxes
     Sampling Organization:  N/A
C-16
-------
                            BOILERS COFIRING WASTES
Reference #33
     Facility Location:  Aargu, Switzerland
     Incinerator Characteristic:  N/A
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  N/A
     Extraction:  Methylene Chloride
     Analysis Technique:  6C/MS
     Precursors Present:  Used Industrial Oil
     Sampling Organization:  Swiss Federal Research Station
Reference #40
                         D
                         D
                         E<
                         H
                         L
1
Facility Location:  Site Identification:
                    A  = Woodfired Stoker
                         Watertube Boiler (No. 6 Oil)
                         Watertube Boiler (No. 6 Oil)
                         Package single burner watertube (No. 6 Oil)
                         Pulverized coal fired boiler
                         Package single burner watertube (Nat. Gas)
Incinerator Characteristic:  See Above
Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  A = 4 tests
                                 D
                                 E
                                 H
                                 L
Extraction:  Soxhlet
Analysis Technique:  HRGC/HRMS
                     Creosote sludge, carbon tetrachloride,
                     chlorobenzene, trichloroethylene, methanol,  toluene,
                     Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether, tetrachloroethylene.
Sampling Organization:  Acurex Corporation
                                          3 tests
                                          6 tests
                                          3 tests
                                          1 test
     Precursors Present:
Reference #41
     Facility Location:   1 was tested at Site A
                          1 was tested at Site D
                          1 was tested at Site E
                      and 1 was tested at Site G
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Site A = Keeler CP Steam Generator
                                  Site D = B&W Wall
                                  Site E
                          -  Fired  Boiler
                 Watertube Boiler, A  Type
        Site  G  =  Firetube  Boiler,  Modified
                 3  pass  wet  back Scotch Marine
           Site  A   =4  tests; All Others =  N/A
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  	 ..
     Extraction:  Soxhlet Methylene Chloride
     Analysis Technique:  HRGC/HRMS
     Precursors Present:  Site A = Waste Wood/Creosote sludge
                          Site D = CL-Solvents
                          Site E = CL-Waste Oil
                          Site G = CL-Wastes
     Sampling Organization:  Acurex Corporation
                                     C-17
-------
Reference #57
      Facility  Location:  N/A
      Incinerator Characteristic:   Industrial Boiler  (pile  burner)
      Sampling  Schedule/* of Samples:   5 days
      Extraction:  N/A
      Analysis  Technique:  GC/MS
      Precursors Present:  PCP/scrap wood
      Sampling  Organization:  Acurex Corporation
Reference #62
     Facility Location:  Midland, Michigan
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Rotary Kiln with and without supplemental
                                  fuel, Tarburner, 72 MM Btu/hr with natural
                                  gas as supplemental fuel
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  TB = Tarburner;  RK = Rotary Kiln
     Extraction:  N/A
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  GAS, SW, Tars, Natural gas
     Sampling Organization:  Dow Chemical
Reference #81
     Facility Location:  Greenhouse, Office Building, U.S.A
     Incinerator Characteristic:   Site A = Cast Iron
                                   Site C = Horizontal
                                   Site D
                                   Site E
                                   Site F
             Return Tube
  Scotch Firetube 3 Pass
  Scotch Firetube 4 Pass
  Scotch Firetube 3
     e   ..   „ L J ,              Site G = Scotch Firetube 4
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  A = 5 tests
                                      C = 2 tests
                                      D = 5 tests
Pass
Pass
                                      E
                                      F
                                      G
5 tests
5 tests
3 tests
     Extraction:  Soxhlet/Methylene Chloride
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  Spiked Waste Oil
     Sampling Organization:  EPA/GCA Corporation
Reference #95
     Facility Location: 'Bay City, Michigan, U.S.A.
     Incinerator Characteristic:  High Efficiency Industrial  Boiler
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  3
     Extraction:  Soxhlet/Methylene Chloride
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  PCBs (500 ppm)
     Sampling Organization:  GCA Corporation
                                    C-18
-------
Reference #96

     Facility Location:  Northeast Utility Boiler
     Incinerator Characteristic:  10% Waste Oil
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  3 days
     Extraction:  Soxhlet/Hexane
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  PCB Waste Oil
     Sampling Organization:  GCA Corporation

Reference #193

     Facility Location:  Europe
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Industrial Boiler (PCP Wastes)
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  N/A
     Extraction:  Soxhlet/Toluene
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  PCP
     Sampling Organization:  University of Umea,  Sweden
                                    C-19
-------
                         HAZARDOUS WASTE INCINERATORS
Reference #2
     Facility Location:  M/T Vulcanus
     Incinerator Characteristic:  1600 C, RT = 1.35 (8/82)
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  10 tests/3 days
     Extraction:  Soxhlet/Hexane
     Analysis Technique:  GC/HRMS
     Precursors Present:  PCB - Contaminated Waste
     Sampling Organization:  TRW, Inc.
Reference #3
     Facility Location:  M/T Vulcanus
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Incinerator Ship,
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  13 days/6 weeks
     Extraction:  Basic Extraction
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  Herbicide Orange
     Sampling Organization:  TRW, Inc.
Reference #21
     Facility Location:  N/A
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Rotary Kiln (>1000°C)
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  N/A
     Extraction:  Soxhlet/Benzene
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  Chlorine-containing industrial  wastes
     Sampling Organization:  Untersuchungs Laboratorium,  Federal  Republic of
                             Germany
Reference #88
     Facility Location:  South Chicago, IL
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Rotary Kilns,  Incin.  Temp.
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  4 runs
     Extraction:  Hexane
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS, GC/HRMS
     Precursors Present:  PCBs
     Sampling Organization:  Midwest Research Institute
(1200°C)
                                     C-20
-------
Reference #108

     Facility Location:  James Denney Farm Site, McDowell, Missouri, U.S.A.
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Mobile Incinerator (Rotary Kiln) 1550-1750°F
                                  Solids: 30 minutes retention
                                  Gases: heated to 2100-2250, 2-3 sec retention
     Sampling Schedule/2 of Samples:  Solid, liquid, gaseous samples
     Extraction:  Soxhlet/Benzene
     Analysis Technique:  6C/MS
     Precursors Present:  Sediment from industrial waste storage lagoon.
                          Dioxin-contaminated liquid still bottoms & soil.
                          Montmorillonite w/absorbed PCB's & solid
                          hexachloroethane.
     Sampling Organization: IT Corporation

Reference #136
     Facility Location:  J.M. Huber Corp.
     Incinerator Characteristic:  PCB Pyrolysis (2000 C)
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  4 tests
     Extraction:  N/A
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  PCBs
     Sampling Organization:  Radian Corporation

Reference #153a
     Facility Location:  Dow Chemical/Midiand, Michigan
     Incinerator Characteristics:  Building 703 incinerator.  Rotary kiln
                                   w/afterburner
     Sampling Schedule/2 of Samples:  3 days; A =
                                              C =
     Extraction:  N/A
     Analysis Technique:  N/A
     Precursors Present:  N/A
     Sampling Organization:  GCA Corporation
8/28/84; B = 8/30/84
9/5/84
                                    C-21
-------
Reference #161

     Facility Location:  1 site tested at American Cyanamid, WV
                         1 site tested at Abco, SC
                         1 site tested at DuPont, LA
                         1 site tested at Mitchell, NC
                         1 site tested at Ross, OH
                         1 site tested at Upjohn, TX
     Incinerator Characteristic:  American Cyanamid, 2 chambers
                                  Abco, 2-Stage boiler
                                  DuPont, Rotary kiln/Liquid injection
                                  Mitchell, Liquid injection
                                  Ross, Rotary kiln
                                  Upjohn, Horizontal Cylinder Thermal Oxidizer
                                      A = Liquid Injection
                                      B = Rotary Kiln/Liquid Injection
                                      C = Horizontal Cylinder Thermal Oxidizer
                                      D = Rotary Kiln
                                      E = 2 Chambers
                                      F = 2 Stage Boiler
Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:
     Extraction:  Soxhlet/Methylene Chloride
     Analysis Technique:  6C/MS
     Precursors Present:  American Cyanimid, Analine waste (0.15% Cl)
                          Abco, Liq Org (.4-6.6% Cl)
                          DuPont, Liq/Sol  (0.05-16% Cl)
                          Mitchell, Liq Org (.4-1% Cl)
                          Ross, Liq Org (.02-6.2% Cl)
                          Upjohn, Liq/Gaseous (21% Cl)
     Sampling Organization:  Midwest Research Institute

Reference #162

     Facility Location:  Midwest Research Institute
     Incinerator Characteristic:  0.8 residence time, 675°C combustion temp.,
                                  Bench scale thermal destruction system
                                  8% oxygen
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  22 tests/60 minutes
     Extraction:  Soxhlet
     Analysis Technique: HRGS/EIMS
     Precursors Present:  PCBs in mineral  oil  (tests 1, 2, 5, 6, 9-12)
                          PCBs in silicone oil  (tests 3, 4, 7, 8, 13, 14, 15)
     Sampling Organization:  Midwest Research Institute
                                    C-22
-------
Reference #194

     Facility Location:
     Incinerator Characteristic:
                         Incinerator, Eksjo,
                         Rotary Cement Kiln,
Sweden; Industrial
Slemmestad, Norway
Boiler, USA;
                                  Fluidized bed municipal incinerator/700%
                                  2 sec. retention
                                  Rotary Cement Kiln, 2000 C in flames
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  Extracts of condensates & particulates
                                      2 sampling periods
     Extraction:  Soxhlet/Toluene
     Analysis Technique:  6C/MS
     Precursors Present:  PCB's, Penta-CP waste
     Sampling Organization:  N/A

Reference #220

     Facility Location:  Los Alamos Pilot Study
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Controlled Air Incineration (1370°C)
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  N/A
     Extraction:  Soxhlet/Toluene
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  PCP-treated wood
     Sampling Organization:  Los Alamos National Laboratory

Reference #234

     Facility Location:  1 site tested at Rollins, Deer Park, TX
                         1 site tested at Ensco, El Dorado, AR
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Rotary kiln with Afterburner (1200°C)
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples
     Extraction:  Soxhlet/Benzene
     Analysis Technique:  GC/HRMS
     Precursors Present:  3 samples
                          4 samples
                                      4 hours
                                     PCB's plus fuel oil
                                     Waste chemicals plus PCB's
                          4 samples; Waste chemicals
     Sampling Organization:  TRW/Wright State University
Reference #246

     Facility Location:  New Jersey
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Rotary Kiln (1200°)
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  3 runs
     Extraction:  N/A
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  Si 1 vex Herbicide
     Sampling Organization:  Roy F. Weston
                                     C-23
-------
                               LIME/CEMENT KILNS
Reference #20a
     Facility Location:  General Portland, Inc., Paulding, Ohio
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Wet-Process Cement Kiln w/ESP for Emission
                                   Control
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  9 day test program
     Extraction:  N/A
     Analysis Technique:  N/A
     Precursors Present:  Coal and waste fuel (toluene, xylene), 2% chloride
     „   ,                waste, 5% chloride waste (freon 113, spiked).
     Sampling Organization:  RTI, Engineering-Science

Reference *20b

     Facility Location:  Oglesby, Illinois
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Dry-Process Cement Kiln
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  6 day test program
     Extraction:  N/A
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  Coal/coke, hydrocarbon solvents, resins and solids
     f   ,                typical of paint wastes, freon 113 (spiked).
     Sampling Organization:  RTI, Engineering-Science

Reference #58a

     Facility Location:  Rockwood, Wisconsin  USA
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Lime Kiln:  Horizontal Rotary Kiln
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  2 Runs/baghouse dust
     _ x   x.   T                     3 Runs/EPA Method 5 filters
     Extraction Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  Petroleum coke and waste fuel (laquer thinner
                          solvents,  alcohols, still bottoms,  paint wastes)
     Sampling Organization:  Monsanto Research Corporation

Reference 184

     Facility Location:  San Juan Cement,  Puerto Rico
     Incinerator Characteristic:  1260 C,  RT = 1.5 sec
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:   4 Samples
     Extraction:  Soxhlet/Benzene
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  Pharm. Wastes (21% Cl)
     Sampling Organization:  Monsanto Research Corp.
                                     C-24
-------
                             HOSPITAL INCINERATORS
Reference #62a
     Facility Location:  USA, Canada
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Canada--Controlled-air,  two chamber
                                          incinerator,  800 Kg/hr.
                                  USA--3 Control!ed-air incinerators;
                                       #1 w/scrubber,  400  Ib/hr,  1750°F
                                       #2 w/waste heat  boiler,  730 Ib/hr,
                                             1950°F
                                       #3 w/waste heat  boiler,  1150 Ib/hr,
                                             1700°F
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  Canada:  4 tests
                                         USA:  3 stack  test filter samples
     Extraction:  Canada--N/A; USA--EPA Method 5 filters
     Analysis Technique:  Canada--N/A; USA--GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  Canada—mixed hospital wastes; USA—#1  infectious
                          waste; #2 general  hospital waste; #3  general
                          hospital  waste
     Sampling Organization:  Canada--Environment Canada; USA—Midwest Research
                             Laboratories

Reference #3la

     Facility Location:  Victoria,  British Columbia, Canada
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Controlled air,  two chamber incinerator,
                                  800 Kg/hr.
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  4 tests
     Extraction:  Soxhlet/benzene
     Analysis Technique:
     Precursors Present:  Mixed hospital  wastes
     Sampling Organization:  Ministry of the Environment,  Ontario,  Canada
                                    C-25
-------
                         WIRE RECLAMATION INCINERATOR
Reference #103
     Facility Location:  Midwestern USA
     Incinerator Characteristic:  3 incinerators
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  N/A
     Extraction:  Hexane/Acetone
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  Wire Insulation
     Sampling Organization:  U.S. EPA
                                    C-26
-------
                                   PCB FIRES
Reference #60
     Facility Location:  Boston, U.S.A.
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Electrical fire involving PCB's
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  One bulk soot sample
     Extraction:  N/A
     Analysis Technique:  N/A
     Precursors Present:  PCB
     Sampling Organization:  N/A
Reference #76
     Facility Location:  Surrahammar, Sweden
     Incinerator Characteristic:  500
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:
     Extraction:  N/A
     Analysis Technique:  N/A
     Precursors Present:  PCB's
     Sampling Organization:  N/A
unit capacitor battery filled with PCB's
10 samples
Reference #98
     Facility Location:  New York, U.S.A.
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Electrical  fire
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  N/A
     Extraction:  N/A
     Analysis Technique:  N/A
     Precursors Present:  PCBs
     Sampling Organization:  N.Y. State Department of Health
Reference #99
     Facility Location:  Miami, Florida, U.S.A.
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Electrical  fire involving PCB's
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  Bulk soot  samples,  surface wipe samples
     Extraction:  Hot Benzene
     Analysis Technique:  HRGC/MS
     Precursors Present:  PCB's
     Sampling Organization:  U.S. National Institute of Occupational  Safety
                             and Health
                                     C-27
-------
Reference #110

     Facility Location:  Stockholm, Sweden
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Transformer station electrical fire
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  N/A
     Extraction:  Hexane
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  PCBs
     Sampling Organization:  National Swedish Environmental Protection Board

Reference #158

     Facility Location:  San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
     Incinerator Characteristic:  PCS transformer electrical fire
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  N/A
     Extraction:  N/A
     Analysis Technique:  N/A
     Precursors Present:  PCBs
     Sampling Organization:  N/A

Reference #192

     Facility Location:  Skoude, Sweden
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Capacitor Battery Fire
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  N/A
     Extraction:  N/A
     Analysis Technique:  HRGC/MS
     Precursors Present:  PCBs
     Sampling Organization:  University of Umea, Sweden

Reference #215

     Facility Location:  Binghamton, New York, U.S.A.
     Incinerator Characteristic:  PCB transformer electrical fire
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  2 floors,  2 repli.
     Extraction:  Soxhlet/Benzene
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  PCBs, Chi or. Benzene
     Sampling Organization:  N.Y. State Department of Health

Reference #218

     Facility Location:  Karl  Site, Chehalis, Washington,  U.S.A.
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Open fire
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  N/A
     Extraction:  Toluene Soxhlet
     Analysis Technique:  N/A
     Precursors Present:  Transformer oil  and cores
     Sampling Organization:  Washington State Department of Ecology
                                     C-23
-------
                             AUTOMOBILE  EMISSIONS
Reference #62
     Facility Location:   Pontiac.
                          Detroit,
                          Auburn,
                          Saginaw.
     Incinerator Characteristic:
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:
     Extraction:  N/A
     Analysis Technique:
     Precursors Present:
         Michigan, U.S.A.
         Michigan, U.S.A.
        Michigan, U.S.A.
         Michigan, U.S.A.
         Pontiac « Reg. Gas/No Catalytic Converter (1)
         Detroit = Unleaded/Catalytic Converter (1)
                   Unleaded/Catalytic Converter/
                     Low/Mileage (1)
         Auburn  = Diesel Truck  (1)
        Saginaw  = Diesel Truck  (1)
             1 = Reg. Gas/No Catalyst
             2 = Unleaded/Catalyst/Low Mileage
             5 - Unleaded/Catalyst
             6 - Diesel Truck (Saginaw)
             7 = Diesel Truck (Auburn)
 GC/MS
 Pontiac
 Detroit
 Auburn
Saginaw
     Sampling Organization:  Dow Chemical
Regular Gas
Unleaded Gas
Diesel Fuel
Diesel Fuel
Reference #213

     Facility Location:  N/A
     Incinerator Characteristic:   Diesel
                                   Unleaded
                                   Leaded
                                   Chevette-Broken Ring
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  Diesel - 2 Cars
                           Unleaded/Catalyst = 10 Cars
                                      Leaded
                        Chevette-Broken Ring
     Extraction:  Methylene Chloride/Hexane
     Analysis Technique:  HRGC/HRMS
     Precursors Present:  4 Diesel Fuel
                          2 Unleaded Gas
                          2 Leaded Gas
     Sampling Organization:  U.S. EPA
                                          Wl
                                          W2
                                          w
                                          w3
                                          W4
                      3 Cars
                      1 Car
                      Diesel
                      Leaded Gas
                      Unleaded Gas
                      Unleaded Gas (Chevette)
                                    C-29
-------
THERMAL ACTIVATED CARBON REGENERATION
                                        Fluidized Bed
Reference #13

     Facility Location:  Cincinnati Waterworks, Ohio, U.S.A.
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Incinerator temp = 1000 C,
                                 (1500°F)
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  1-2 hours; 4 tests
     Extraction:  Soxhlet/Benzene
     Analysis Technique:  HRGC/HRMS
     Precursors Present:  Activated Carbon
     Sampling Organization:  Battelle Columbus Laboratories

Reference #156

     Facility-tacettion:  Cincinnati Waterworks, Ohio, USA
     Incinerator Characteristic:  Carbon Regeneration
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  4 recuperator; 3 afterburner; 2 stack
     Extraction:  Soxhlet/Benzene
     Analysis Technique:  HRGC/HRMS
     Precursors Present:  Activated Carbon
     Sampling Organization:  Battelle Columbus Laboratories
               C-30
-------
Reference #200

     Facility Location:  N/A
     Incinerator Characteristic:  700C/15 sec, 900C/35 sec, 700C/0.5 sec,
                                  900C/.67 sec, 700C/.7 sec, 900C/3.4 sec,
                                  900C/1.6 sec, 250C
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  N/A
     Extraction:  Trisodium Phosphate
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present: 2,4,5-TCP, Alchem 4135, Diptank sludge, Wood Brite 24
     Sampling Organization:  Environment Canada/Dearborn Environmental
                             Services

Reference #219

     Facility Loca-tion:  N/A
     Incinerator Characteristic:  N/A
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  6 Trials
     Extraction:  Benzene/Methanol
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxy
     Sampling Organization:  Dow Chemical

Reference #226

     Facility Location:  Quartz Tube
     Incinerator Characteristic:  N/A
     Sampling Schedule/* of Samples:  N/A
     Extraction:  N/A
     Analysis Technique:  GC/MS
     Precursors Present:  Pine and HC1
     Sampling Organization:  Wright State University
                                    C-33
-------
                                    TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                             (Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
  . REPORT NO.
  EPA-450/4-84-0141
                                                           3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION-NO.
  \. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
  National Di'oxin Study Tier  4
  Final  "Literature Review
                               - Combustion Sources
             5. REPORT DATE
              June 1986
                                                          6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
  Martha H.  Keating
                                                          8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.

                                                            86-203-024-40-13
. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Radian Corporation
Post  Office Box 13000
Research Triangle Park, NC   27709
                                                            10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
                                                            11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
                                                              68-02-3889
  !• SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRE.SS
   U. S.  Environmental Protection  Agency
   Office of  Air Quality Planning  and Standards
   Monitoring and Data Analysis  Division
   Research Triangle Park, NC  27711
                                                          13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
                                                            Final
                                                          14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
               'NOTES
   EPA Project Officer:  William H.  Lamason, II
   The objective of Tier 4 of the National Dioxin Study is  to  determine if combustion
   sources  emit significant amounts  of chloronated dibenzo-p-dioxins (CDD) and chloro-
   nated .dibenzofurans (CDF) to the  atmosphere.  An initial literature review was con-
   ducted during 1984 and published  in October 1984 as "National Dioxin Study Tier 4 -
   Combustion  Sources, Initial Literature Review and Testing Options", EPA-450/4-84-
   014b.  The  purpose of this report is to update the initial  literature review.  This
   document includes CDD/CDF emissions information available through July 1985.
   A tabular summary of the CDD/CDF  emissions data base and a  reference list of 250
   citations are included.
                                KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
                                              b.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
                                                                         c.  COSATI Field/Group
 Air Emissions
 Combustion Sources
 Dioxin
 Furans
 TCDD
 TCDF
                     PCDF
                     Data Assessment
                     Combustion Conditions
                     Chlorine Combustion
                     PCDD
Air Pollution  Emissions
Data
 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
                                              19. SECURITY CLASS (ThisReport)
                                              Unclassified
                                                                       21. NO. OF PAGES
                                                                              231
   Release Unlimited
                                            20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)
                                            Unclassified
                                                                         22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
-------
-------