* '" '     UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

:•*    '                WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
   • ••    •''      •   '  •••              • •
                                                 MR AND RADIATION
 THE CLEAN AIR ACT AMENDMENTS OF 1990
             SUMMARY MATERIALS
                       U.S. EPA

                   November 15, 1990
                                                  Printed on Recycled Paper

-------

-------
   CLEANAIR ACT AMENDIVIENTSOF 1990

           TABLE OF
Overview of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
       One-Page Summaries of Key Titles
  ;            Glossary of Terms
     -„       Legislative Chronology

-------

-------
                      The Clean'Air Act Amendments, of 1990,
    In June 1989  President Bush proposed sweeping revisions to the Clean Air Act.
Building on Congressional proposals advanced during the 1980s, the President proposed
legislation designed to curb three major threats to the nation's environment and to the
health of millions of Americans: acid rain, urban air pollution, and toxic air emissions.
The proposal also called for establishing a national permits program to make the lawmore
wdrkable, and an improved enforcement program to help ensure better compliance with
the'Act." •'•''•,.,•'"'.' '; v;i'... "•-,'.:  .••./.'• ^>.-;,-1  ;.•';.:•. V •• .:^C.c". .•";:  '••• '.•};••'   . ."•.' ''• '•••':  '7 7  •:

       By large votes, both  the House of Representatives (401-21) and the jSenate (89-11)
passed Clean Air bills that  contained the major components ofthe President's proposals.
Both  bills also added prpvisipbs requiring the phaseout of ozone-depleting chemicals,
roughly according;to the schedule outlined in international negotiatto^
Protocol).  The Senate and House)bills also added Specific research and development
provisions, asv well as Detailed programs  to address accidental  releases of toxic  air
pollutants.  ;  • '   ;-7 ':.'•••.• -'.'--'v /'.;,;. _;•:.<•,,<... 7''''7/77   '•' -]' ,f^:''~:::'^'' .;"v.''?- •'. " •  •".•'•  ":.

      : A joint conference committee met ^rom July to October 1990 to iron put differences
in the bills and both Houses overwhelmingly voted out the package recommended by the
Conferees,  the President  received the Bill front Congress on I^pyember 14, 1990 and
signed it on November 15,1990.                    ;

    Several progressive^ and creative iiew^themes ai«;embodiedih the Amendments; themes
necessary for effectively achieving the air quality goals and regulatory reforin expected from
these far-reaching amendments. Specifically the new law:             -

       o     encburages the  use  of r market-based principles and  other innovative
             approaches, like^performance-based standards and emission banking and
 ••    .-„-'.  ^trading;'';  " ,\:  •*'..'"<' .:.'.,,   ',••••'•:.••"'.•.  .'••  ••.''•••'.."..•'   •'•'  "         ';
  *  - ' ',    •   - -    •      .   •        ' -v   . " •    ',.,''    ",    , -  .    .-  '  ' " ', .  , ...    . '   .  '  -
       o     provides a framework from which alternative clean  fuels will be  used by
             setting standards in the fleet and California pilot program that can be met
             by the most cost-effective combination of fuels and technology;
  '  '' -   ,   '-*'•'    ."*'•'•'.     "   ' "'"   -'     ''    ' •   •''-•"'    - '. '     '    "  *
       o     promotes the use of clean low sulfur coal and natural gas, as  well as
              innovative  technologies to  clean high sulfur coal through the acid  rain
   • ."-    -';  •program;  ,  • -",  -    ".'    .•••   ••    •   '•'-...  '•-..-'./•  .•-'.'

       o      reduces enough energy waste and creates enough of a market for clean fuels
              derived from grain and natural gas to cut dependency on oil imports by one
           .  million barrels/day;
       o     promotes energy concervation  through an acid  rain  program  that gives
             utilitites flexibility to obtain needed emission reductions through programs
             that encourage customers to conserve energy.      '

     With these themes providing the framework for the Clean Air Act amendments  and,
 with our committment to implement the new law quickly, fairly and efficiently, Americans
 will get what they asked for:  a healthy, productive environment,, linked to sustainable

-------
egnnnmic growth and sound £D£rgy policy^
Title l!  Provitf APE far Attainment
and Maintenance of National Ambient
Air Quality Standards        .           .                       ,             *

   Although the Clean Air Act Of 1977 brought about significant improvements in bur
Nation's air quality, the urban air pollution problems of ozone (smog), carbon monoxide
(CO) and particulate matter (PM-10) persist. Currently, over 100 million American* live
in cities which are out of attainment with the with the public health standards for ozone.
    the most widespread and persistent urban pollution problem is ozone. The causesi.
this and the lesser problem of carbon monoxide (CO) and particulate matter (PM-10)
pollution in our urban areas are largely due to the diversity and number of urbanjijr
pollution sources.  One component of urban smog - hydrocarbons - comes from automobile
emissions, petroleum refineries, chemical plants, dry cleaners, gasolinestatip^house
painting and printing shops, Another key component - nitrogen oxides - comes from the
combustion of fuel for transportation, utilities and industries.;    v f,      r^; i; ^- t

    While there are other reasons for continued, high '-levels of .ozone pollution, such as
growth in the number of stationary sources of hydrocarbons and continued growth in
automobile travel, perhaps the most telling reason is that the  remaining sources£f
hydrocarbons are also the most difficult to control, l^ese are the small soureesr,- generally
those that emit  less than 100 tons ofhydrocarbonsperyeanThese(sources, such as auto
body  shops and dry cleaners, may individuallyemit Jess than 10., tons per  year, but
coUectively emit many hundreds Of tons  of ^pollution. ;>. v<, v-v^-;,;;-^:e.'x'. >:!"^^;;-.4;^,,^

    The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 create a'iiew; balanced  strategy for the Ration
to attack the problem of urban smog. Overall, the new law reveals  the Congress's high
expectations of the states and the Federal government.  While it gives states more time to,
meet the air quality standard - up to 20 years .for ozone in Los Angeles -,.it also requires
states to make constant formidable progress in reducing emissions.  It requires the Federal
government to reduce emissions from cars, trucks, and buses; from consumer products such
as hair spray and window washing compounds; and from ships and barges during loading
and unloading  of petroleum products.  The Federal government  must also develop the
technical guidance that States need to .control  stationary sources.    ^.       ,

    The new, law addresses the urban air pollution problems of ozone (smog), carbon
monoxide (CO), and, particulate matter (PM-10). Specifically, it clarifies how areas are
 designated and redesignated "attainment." It also allows EPA to define the boundaries of
 "nonattainment" areas: geographical areas whose air quality does not meet Federal air
 quality standards designed to protect public health.      ,       ,

    The new law also establishes provisions defining when and how the federal government
 can impose sanctions on areas of the country that have not met certain conditions.

    For the pollutant ozone, the new law establishes nonattainment area classifications
 ranked according to the severity of the areas's air pollution problem.  These classifications
 are marginal, moderate, serious, severe and extreme. EPA assigns each nonattainment area
 one of these categories, thus triggering varying requirements the area must comply with in

-------
order to meet the ozone standard.
   ' ' .     "**           f
  '  As mentioned, noriattainment areas will have to implement different control measures,
depending upon their classification.  Marginal  areas, for example,  are  the closest to
meeting the  standard.  They will be required Jo conduct an inventory of their ozone-
causirig emissions and institute a permit program. Nonattainment areas with more senous
air quality problems must implement various control measures, The worse the air quality,
the more controls areas will have to implement.                               ,

    The new law also establishes similar programs for areas that do hot meet the federal
health standards for the pollutants carbon monoxide and paniculate matter.  Areas
exceeding the standards for these pollutants will be divided into "moderate" and "serious"
classifications. Depending upon the degree to which they exceed the carbon monoxide
standard, areas will be required toi implement programs introducing oxygenated fuels
and/or enhanced emission inspection programs, among other measures. Depending upon
their classification, areas exceeding the particulate matter standard will have to implement
either reasonably available control measures (RACM) or best Available control measures
 (BACM), among other,requirements.        -.-•       ;.                         :


Title II; Provisions Relating to ^       ,  :             ;                "      .
 Mobile Sources  ; '••/./•> '•••" ' ••_ .• .--v '•'.-.  ''•''•:./•;..;•'.,'•.;'.' '-  •'  •'•  '.\ •''•'''"•  -:    •'"•'.• '•.'•• '

   ' While motor vehicles built today emit fe*ver pollutants (60% to 80% less, depending on
 the pollutant) than those built in the 1960s, cars and trucks still account for almost half
 the emissions of the ozone precursors VOCs and NOx, and up to 90% of the CO emissions
 in urban areas. The principal reason for this problem is the rapid growth in the number
 of vehicles on  the roadways and the total miles driven.  This growth has offset a large
 portion of the  emission'reductions gained from motor vehicle controls.

     In view of the unforeseen growth in automobile emissions in urban areas combined with
"the serious air pollution problems in many .urban areas, the Congress has made significant
 changes to the motor vehicle provisions on  the 1977 Clean Air Act.

     The Clean Air Act of 1990 establishes tighter pollution standards for emissions from
 automobiles and trucks. These standards will reduce tailpipe, emissions of hydrocarbons,
 carbon monoxide, and nitrogen oxides on a phased-in basis beginning  in model year 1994.
 Automobile manufacturers will also be required to reduce vehicle emissions resulting from
 the evaporation of gasoline during refueling.   ,

     Fuel quality will also be controlled.  Scheduled reductions in gasoline volatility and
 sulfur content of diesel fuel, for example, will be required. New programs requiring cleaner
. (so-called "reformulated" gasoline) will be initiated in 1995 for the nine  cities with the worst
 ozone problems. Other cities can "opt in" to the reformulated gasoline program. Higher
 levels <2.7%) of alcohol-based oxygenated  fuels will be produced and sold in 41 areas
 during the winter months that exceed the federal standard for carbon monoxide.

     The new law also establishes a clean fuel car pilot program in California, requiring the
 phase-in of tighter emission limits for 150,000 vehicles in model year 1996 and 300,000 by
 the model year  1999.   These standards can be met  with any combination of vehicle
 technology and cleaner fuels. The standards become even stricter in 2001.  Other states

-------
can "
     opt in? to this program, thoug^only thro^ iiicentiyw^
mandates.    '.        ,';'-•    '/..,,,,/,  '.   .•••:'•','  .-. • ,"'.'' ,-.  •....:..••••' •. "•':••'.'. ''"•  •''''''• '''
            twentv-six of the dirtiest areas of the country Mill have to ^doptajprp^
           iSK2S«^ fleets of 10 or more vehicles beginning as early as
1998. ,


     in;  Air Toxics
    Toxic air Bollutahts are those pollutants which are hazardous to humait health,or th?
^wertWwn^i&cW™™* under another P^ion of the^Clean A!r Act^
Theie nollutants are typically carcinogens, mutagens, and reproductive toxins. The Clean
Mi ^A^fA^endme^sTm? Sled toresult in substantial Auctions of the emissions of
ftesel^SSg substances. In facti over the history of the air toxics program only
seven pollutants have been regiilatecU           ,                                    ; ;

    We know that the toxic air pollution problem is widespread. Information generated
ftomBieXJ^^
Mlion pounds of toxic air pollutants are emitted annually m the Umted States^ ^ EPA
stSs Indicate that exposure to such quantities of air toxics may result in J-OOO^o 3000;
cancer deaths each year.  ,  ;  . \'   ./"'   •  '..;••/••"' :;  •'.'.:'• '•  ' '':';V-'; ',••'!' '; :.  '•':"'- :••'"'. ''

    The Clean Air Act of 1990 offers  a comprehensive plan lor achieving  significant
reductions in emissions of hazardous air ^ pollutantsirdm ittajor:sour«js. Industry ««P^s
to iSs? suggest that an estimated 2.7 billion pounds of toxic air pollutants  were emitted
 tatottetoSS^^
The  new law will improve EPA's ability.to address this problem effectively and it will
 dramatically accelerate progress in controlling major toxic air pollutants.,

     The new law includes a  list of 189 toxic air pollutants of which ' e?isf io^ ^us*pb«
 reduced. EPA must publish a list of source categories that emit certain levels of these
 pollutants within one year after the new law is passed. The list of source categories must
 include:  1)  major sources emitting 10 tons/year of any one,  or 25  tons/year of any
 combination of those  pollutants; and, 2) area sources (smaller sources, such as dry
 cleaners).   '          .' '    • . ' _ •-•' '  ; :  ' "   ' '   •"  '..•;,•     .'.''••.';•„•   -  ..,•...'.

     EPA then must issue "Maximum Achievable Control Technology" (MACT) standards
 for each listed source category according to a prescribed schedule.  These standards will
 be based on the best demonstrated control technology or practices within  the regulated
 industry, and EPA must issue the standards for forty source categories within two years
 of passage of the new law.  The remaining source categories will be  controlled according
 to a schedule that ensures  all controls will be achieved within 10 years of enactment.
 Companies that voluntarily reduce emissions according to certain conditions can get a six
 'year extension from meeting the MACT requirements.

      Eieht years after MACT is installed on a source, EPA must examine the risk levels
 remaining at the regulated facilities  and  determine whether additional controls  are
 necessary to reduce unacceptable residual risk.    .   .

      The new law also establishes a Chemical Safety Board to investigate accidental releases

-------
oextreme                                                       to.
controllihg^ir emissions froin inuWapal, hospital and othfir commercial and mdustnal
incinerators.     ,';''-.: ,V';V ., v/;"V "" '_.-'• '..'" :'/  •'•'• '  - •;•','••'.•"•,' ,".  "*


Title IV; Acid Deposition Control                                              ^

    As many know, acid rain occurs when sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions are
transformed in the atmosphere and return to the earth in rain, fog or snow. Approximately
20 million tons of SO2 are emitted annually in the United States, mostly from the burning
of fossil fuels by electric utilities.  Acid rain damages lakes, harms forests and buildings,
contributes ta reduced visibility, andis suspected of damaging health.

    T&e new Clean Air Act will result in a permanent 10 million ton reduction in sulfur
dioxide (S02) emissions from 1980 levels. To achieve this, EPA will allocate allowances
in two  phases permitting utilities to emit one ton of sulfur dioxide.  The first phase,
effective Januaiy 1, 1995, requires 110 powerplants to reduce their emissions to a level
equivalent to the product  of an emissions rate of 2.5 Ibs of SO2/mmBtu x an average of
their 1985-1987 fuel use. Plants that use certain control technologies to meet their Phase
I reduction requirements may receive a two year extension of compliance until 1997,  The
hew law also allows fot a special allocationpf 200,000  annual allowances per year each of
the 5 yearsof phase I to powerplants in^^Illinois, Indiana and,Ohio.  ;                -

    The second phase,  becomingeffective January l, 2000, will  require approximately
2000 utilities to reduce their emissions to a levelequivalent to the product of an emissions
rate of 12 Ibs of SO2/mm Btu x the average of their 1985-1987 fuel use.iln both phases,
affected sources will berrequired to install systems that continuously monitor emissions in
order to track progress and assure compliance.

    The new law allows utilities to trade allowances within their systems and/or buy or sell
 allowances  to  and  from other affected  sources.  Each  source must have sufficient
•allowances to cover its  annual emissions. If-not,'the source is subject to a $2,000 /ton
 excess emissions fee and a requirement to offset the excess emissions in the following year.

    Nationwide, plants that emit SO2 at a  rate below 12 Ibs/mmBtu will be able  to
 increase emissions by 20% between a baseline year and 2000. Bonus allowances will be
 distributed to accommodate growth by units  in states .with a statewide average below 0.8
 Ibs/mmBtu. Plants experiencing increases in their utilization in the last five years also
 receive bonus allowances.  50,000 bonus allowances per year are allocated to plants in 10
 midwestern states that make reductions in Phase I.  Plants that repowei-with a qualifying
 clean coal technology may receive a 4 year extension of the compliance date for Phase II
 emission limitations.

     The new law also includes specific requirements  for reducing emissions  of nitrogen
 oxides, based on EPA regulations to be issued not later than mid-1992 for certain boilers
 and  1997 for all remaining boilers.


 Title Vt  Permits

   ; The  new law introduces an  operating  permits  program modelled after a  similar


• -  .-               ••''.''•  V  •  ;  5    •      '          •

-------
 program under the Federal National Pollution Elimination Discharge ^st?£
 §Se tmroose of the operating permits program is.t0;enspi«..cpmpli9noe..^
 S£Se^
 pollution sources subject to the program must obtain an^^ operating permit, states must
 develop and implement the program" and EPA must issue permit program regulations,
 rerfew each state's proposed program, and oversee the state's efforts to implement  any
 approved program. EPA must also develop and implement a federal permit program when
 a state fails to adopt and implement its own, program..

    This program-in many ways the most important procedural reform contained in the
 new law-willI greatly strengthen enforcement  of the Clean Air Act.  It will^enhance air
 quality control in a variety of ways. First, adding such a program ^jdajes Ihe^ean^;
 Act, making it more consistent with other environmental statutes. The Clean Water Ac^,;
 the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
 Rodenticide Act all require permits. The 1977 Clean Air laws also, requires a construction
 permit for certain pollution sources, and about 35 states have their own laws requiring
 operating permits.              ;    •:                      ;       ,;  ;

    The new program clarifies ,and makes more enforceable a source's pollution control
 requirements.  Currently,  a  source's pollution  control obligations; may be ^scattered
 throughout numerous hard-to-firid provisions of state and federal regulations, and m many
 cases, the source is not required under the applicable State Implementation Plan to. submit
 periodic compliance reports to EPA or the states. The permit program will ensure that all
 of a source's obligations with respect to its pollutants will be contained in one permit
 document, and that the source will file periodic reports identifying the extent to which_it
' has complied with those obligations. Both of these requirements will greatly enhance the
 ability of Federal and state agencies to evaluate its air quality situation.    ;    ' .;/•..•

     In addition, the new program will provide a ready vehicle for states to assume
 administration, subject to federal oversight, of significant parts of the air toxics program
 and the acid ram»pft>gram. And, through the permit fee provisions, discussed below, the
 program will greatly augment a state's resources to administer pollution control programs
 by requiring sources of pollution to pay their  fair share  of the costs of a state's air
 pollution program.                                   .         !     ,

     Under the new law, EPA must issue program regulations within one year of enactment.
 Within three years of enactment, each state must submit to EPA a permit program meeting
 these regulatory requirements. After receiving the state submittal, EPA has one year to
 accept or reject the program.  EPA must levy sanctions against a state that does not submit
 or enforce a permit program.             ,       ,

     Each permit issued to a facility will be for a fixed term of up to five years. The new
 law establishes a permit fee whereby the state collects alee from the permitted facility to
  cover reasonable direct and indirect costs of the permitting program.

     All sources subject to the permit program must submit a complete permit application
 within 12 months of the effective date of the progjram.  The state permitting authority must
  determine whether or not to approve an application within 18 months of the date it receives
  the application.

      EPA has 45 days to review each permit and to object to permits that violate the Clean

-------
                                                          /
Air Act  If EPA fails to object to a permit that violates the Act or the implementation plan,
                           to ob^ct within 60 days Allowing EPA's45.da^ ^revie* 'period
                                                       icial review of EPA's decision
and EPA mu«*-«*iit.rfr denv the nermit witmn ou aays.  Judicial review of EPA's decision
on a citizen'
         miist   ant or deny the pennit within 60 days.  Judicial
         en's petition can pccur in the Federal court of appeals.
Title VI; Strfltosnheric Ozone and
Global Climate Protection

    The new law guilds  on the maricet-based structure  andRequirements^ currehny
contained inEPA'sregulations to phaseout the production^rsubstan?es that deplete the
bzone laver  the law requires a Complete phase-out of CFCs and halons with interim
StS^omeSd changes^ ?>^th^existing Montreal:Protocol, revised in June

1990.    •.••.•'••.'.-•/;.''".•"•'•'• ,". '•.'•••.:.".'...'• '•••••..- •^'•';-" .-../•. V; .*;-•'•'•'•"'• •' '  .  ' •  ',  "' ,-[•"'
    Under these provisions, EPA must list all regulated substances along wit^their ozone^
depletion potential, atmospheric lifetimes and global warming potentials within 60 days of
enactment..* '    .-'.'•  '-/.     •      •   '•..'••   -\_ '" •'.••?•,;'•   •"'.'":••.-    :- •   .

    In^ addition, EPA must ensure that Qass I chemicals be phased out  on a^schedule
similar to  that  specified in the  Montreal  Protocol  -  CFC's, halons,  and. carbon
tetrachloride by 2000; methyl  chloroform by 2(K)2^ .but  with  more  stpngentvinterim
reductions. Class II chemicals (HCFC's) will be phased out by 2030. Regulations for plass
I chemicals will be required within  10  months, and Class II chemical regulations will be
required by December 31,1999.

    The law also requires EPA to publish  a list of safe and unsafeI substitutes for Class I
and II chemicals and to ban the use of unsafe substitutes.           :

    The law requires noneJssentiaT products releasing Class I chemicals to be-banned'within'
2 years of enactment. i(ln 1994 a ban  will go into effect for aerosols and  non-insulating
fpamsusing Class II chemicals, with exemptions for flammability and safety: Regulations
 for this purpose will be required within one year of enactment, to become effective two
years afterwards.


 Title Vllt  Provisions Relating to Enforcement

     The Clean vAir Act of 1990 contains a broad array of authorities to niake the law more
 readily enforceable, thus bringing it  up  to  date with the other major environmental
 statutes.
     EPA has new authorities to issue administrative penalty orders up to $200,000, and
 field citations up to $5000 for lesser infractions. Civil judicial penalties are enhanced.
 Criminal penalties for knowing violations are upgraded from misdemeanors to felonies, and
 new criminal authorities for knowing and negligent endangerment will be established.
               '     .'-''-•.      •  -    >i   '  '    f    ,  .
     In addition, sources must certify their compliance, and EPA has authority to issue
 administrative subpoenas for compliance data.  EPA will also be authorized to issue
 compliance orders with compliance schedules of up to  one year.             -

-------
   The citizen suit provisions have also been revised to rfl^ cities to




                                  '            '        '"   '         ••'
settlements.
Qther Titles             ,        - ;. '  ,     '. .•  _,.'  "  •, ;'    ''•''•' •.•   '^-  ''''.'"-' ^ ']

      The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 continue the federal acid rain research
Droeranfand contato seVe^iew provisions relating to research, development and .air
mS^^S^ontairi provisions to provide additional unemployment benents
ZoS^e^ lSnin?ParSiersliip Act to workers ^ laid %off as ; a consequence of
compHance vdth the ^lean Air Act. The Act also contains provisions to improve visibility
near National Parks and other parts of the country.
                                          8

-------
GLEAN AIR ACT AMENDMENTS OF 1990
      SUMMARY OF KE^ TITLES
              U.S. EPA
            November 15,1990

-------

-------
., •;•' .v''';••-•''..-^ v^y •;';:•:'  .x  .,;Title I - Nbnattainment ;•;•/'•        '•/-V.    Vv;'. "'

b     Divides! cities into Six categories"for ozone (3 yrs. - marginal, 6yrs, moderate,'9
>'•;;•.'.  yrs serious, 15 -17 yrs severe,20 yrs extreme) and 2 categories fqr Carbon
 ;     monoxide.    y""  '•-. .-':'••. -- •••-,•' '}•'.  ''•'---..•'';, ;',•./•'•  '•>:'•'.  • ••""•-.'"•  '  ".'  '••"''-.

o     % Reduction; Applies to ozone only. Moderate areas arid above must achieve
      -15% VQC reduction within 6 years otenactment. For serious and above, average
      of 3% VQC per year thereafter until attainment.  Annual VOC and NOx
      reductions as needed to attain. /The 15% and 3% isi from an adjusted baseline
      and all reductions,except those from existing FMVCP, gasoline volatility, RACT
      and I/M fixups are creditable^  Possjtole exemption from % reduction based on
      technological feasibility, if SIP adopts measures similar to those in next higher
      -category and if all feasible measures are adopted, in the first 6 years. NOx  _
      substitution possible after 6 years.  ;"    :                      ^

 o     Prescribed iMeasures;  Maior NQx sources meet same requirements as major
      VOC sources unless EPA finds rib benefit. /All  ozone npnattainment areas correct
      existing RAGT rules and I/M programs.  Moderate areas add basic I/M* Stage.!
      H and RACT on .new and existing CTG: arid  100 ton non-CTG sources, and make
      an attainment demonstration. Serious areas .add enhanced I/M, RACT on 50 ton
      non^CTG sources, a fleet vehicle program in areas of 250,000 and up, TCMs
      needed to offset vehicle^growth, special rules for source modifications, and,.;,
 .   , photochemical modeling attainment demonstration.  Severe areas add RACT for
      25 ton VbC nqriTCTG sources and proyisions requiring adoption of TCMs, if   ;.
    -  : necessary to meet progress requirements and employer trip reduction provisions.l
      Extreme areas add RACT on 10 ton sources, eliminate feasibility exemption from
      15% and 3%, add NOj?^reductions from clean fuelsfor advanced technology, have
      peak hour traffic cbntrols; can get SIP approved based on anticipated new
      technology:         '

 o,    Federal Measures:  EPA issues 11 new CTGs plus CTGs for aerospace coatings,
      shipbuilding and repair; marine vessels rule and consumer products rules.
      Requires an ACT for 25 ton NOx and VOC sources.

 o     Sanctions; Grace period of 18 months to cure planning failure. Then must apply
      1 of 2 sanctions (modified highway ban or 2:1  offset). Air grants are available.
      There are Existing construction  bans remain, but no new ones.

 o    Federal Implementation Plans (FIPsll; Within 2 years of state failure to develop
      ari adequate SIP, riiandatory attainment FIPs required.       ,

 o    Transport;  Sets up 11-state NE transport commission. Requires transport, states
      to adopt RACT for existing and new CTGs, RACT on major (50-ton) non-CTG , .
      sources, enhanced I/M in MSAs above 100,000 and Stage II or equivalent.  No
      opt-out of VOC measures. Major NOx sources meet same requirements as major
      VOC sources unless EPA finds no benefit.

 p  ;   CO and PM-10; Wintertime oxygenated fuels  in all CO areas >9.4 ppm.  Areas
       > 12.7 ppm add VMT forecast, enhanced I/M  and demonstrate attainment.
       Serious CO areas  add TCMs as in severe ozone areas.  PM-10 areas initially
       designated nonattainment must attain by 12/94 (possible extension to 2001).
       Moderate areas adopt RACM; serious areas add BACM.  Serious CO and PM-
       10 areas adopt measures to achieve 5% reduction per year effective upon failure
       to attain.

-------
                                                _ .'/   • ' •   •   ' / B  / , . .',; \ |M • • • . f, ,_ ". i' •"'; '"^ • ''
                        Title II - Mobile Sources
     ng Standards; Cars and light trucks: Tier I is ^SfflC, 3.4 CO *nd 0.4
      Possible Tier II is 0.125 NMHC, 1.7 CO and 0.2 NOx^ Her I phased in
           Fffitiveness of Her II in 2004 depends on EPAi study of need,   :
           ^SctS/ Ireful life tended to, 100,000 iniles for most
emission, standards.             ; .  .    .            .     ,

r»M Temnerature CO; Phase-in beginning in 1994 of 10 gpmat 20 degrees F for
cars. A ^4 ^m standard takes eifecTin 2002 if 6 or more cities are m €Q   ,
nonattainment in mid-1997.                                            '
Clean Fuels: In 1998 all centrally-fueled fleets in 26 areas must buy 30% of
^SttSt meetstandards of 0.075 gpm VOC and 0^ NOx; nojosdc standards.
Iffu^ve^^^t being offered for sale m C^for^the prpgram." delayed
possibly until 2001. Purchase requirements mcreaseio 70% in 3rd year.
In 1996, 150,000 clean fuel cars are required to be sold in California; in?rea^i to
300 000 ner year by 1999.  These cars must meet a standard of 0.125 gpm VOC.
Rm's^ Wns in ^2001 mth cars meeting fleet-type standards. Other cities can
opt-in to program.    ,            ,                 ,                 ,       !

Tgpfnrmiilflted Gasoline: Beginning in 1995 reformulated gasoline inquired in the
9 wSoS SK minimlam oxygen content (2.0%), benzeneXl.0%), aromatics
  ZS^Cs andtorics reductioiis (15%^ up to 20^5% m 2(M)0), CUies ican opt-in.
 Oxvfuels; Beginning in 1992, gas in 41 Cb areas must have 2;7% oxygen level in
 winter months.                         ;     ;    ;

 Urban Buses; Delays diesel particulate standard i from 1991, to J9/3%Begiimin^in
 1994 all buses must meet a PM standard of 0.05 g/hphr (if not feasible lEPA will
 set at 0.07). Based on performance EPA may implement a low polluting bus
 program in larger cities.                         ".;           .

 Refueling; After consultation with DOT on safety issues, EPA required to
 promulgate onboard controls.  Stage II requirements vary by classification.

 Volatility; 9 psi in most of the country beginning 1992;  EPA can set lower levels in
 warmer areas, but cannot require any standard below 9 psi in attainment areas.

 pesulfurization; Diesel fuel highway use limited to 0.05%  sulfur by weight.

 Air Toxics; Based on a study of mobile source-related toxics, EPA will regulate, at a
 .minimum, emissions of benzene and formaldehyde.

 Non-road Engines; Based on a study, EPA may regulate any category of non-road
 engines that contribute to urban air pollution.  At a minimum, EPA must control
 locomotive emissions.

 Lead in Gasoline; As of January 1, 1996, lead banned from .use in motor vehicle
 fuel.                       .

-------
                                 Title III - Air Toxics
           of Pollutants and Soui^e Categories: Law lists 189 hazardous air pollutants;
       One year after enactment EPA lists source categories; (industries) which emit one or J.
       more of the 189 pollutants. In 2 years, EPA must publish a schedule for regulation
       of the listed source categories.

 o     Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACTh   MAC* regulations are
       emission standards based on the best demonstrated control technology and
       practices in the regulated industry., MACT for existing sources must be as'stringent
       as the average control efficiency or the best controlled 12% of similar sources
       excludingsources Whichhave achieved the LAER within 18 months prior to  •.-•'.
       proposal or 30 months prior to promulgation. MACT for new sources ;must be as
       stringent as thebest controlled similar source.  Fpralf listed major i>oint sources,
       EPA must promulgate MAGT standards - 40 source categories plus coke ovens
       within  2 years and 25% of the remainder of .the list within 4 years. An  additional
''. C. •'"•  25% in 7 years and the final 5O% in 10 years.      :                          v

 o     Residual Risk;  Eight years after MACT standards are established (except for those
       established 2 years after enactment), standards'.to protect against the residual
>       health and environmental risks remaining must be promulgated, if necessary.  The
       standards would be triggered if more than one source in a category exceeds a  ;
       maximum individual risk of"cancer of 1 in:1 million.  T*ese residual risk
       regulations would be based on current CAA language that specifies that standards
   ,^ must-achievean "ampleinargin;Of safety".                 (      ;     -

 o     Accidental Releases; Standards to prevent against accidental release of toxic
       chemicals are required. EPA must establish a list of at least 100 chemicals and
       threshold quantities. All facilities with these chemicals on  site in excess of the
       threshold quantities would be subject to the regulations which would include hazard
  •     assessments and risk management plans; An independent chemical safety board is
       established to investigate major accidents, conduct research,/and promulgate   :
       regulations for accidental release reporting.

  o     Other Issues; A study of area source emissions and a strategy to reduce the cancer
       incidence from these emissions by 75% is required. Regulation of source categories
       accounting for 90% of the emissions of the 30 most hazardous area source
       pollutants.  Coke ovens can  receive an extension of the residual risk standards until
       2O2O in exchange for compliance with stringent emission standards. Air toxics
       regulations of utilities will be based on the results of toxic emissions studies.  A
        study  of deposition to the Great Lakes, Lake Champlain, Chesapeake Bay and
       coastal waters will determine whether additional regulation is needed.  Regulations
        are required for all types of municipal waste combustors and an exclusion for
        facilities which burn 30% or less municipal waste.

-------
                           - •  -V -?•  ''. >.' '  "' ' .-".-

                         Title IV -Acid Rain
2000.
                         Sd a requirement :tb Offset excess tons in future years.
                         sales   dtions of allowances.
Phase!- S02 emission reductions are achieved in two phases. Phjiset aUowances

            £

Sk±3? UnTts'Wnois, Indiana or Ohio ^allotted a pro rata share of ;an
additional 200,000 allowances annually during Phase l.
                                                                           (
 Phase II- Phase II begins in icm  All utility ^ units greater than 25 MW that emit
         '                    will be allocated allowances/at that rate        ^
                than would have been received based on
                  OO b^us allowances are allotted to plants in 10 midwestern
 states that make reductions in Phase I.
      -  Utility NOx reductions will help to achieve a 2 million ton reduction from
    0 \SSSSSSSfM be accomplished through requ^d ^ performance^
 standards for certain existing boilers in Phase I, and others in Phase II, EPA win
 develop a revised NOx NSPS for utility boilers.
 Repowerine: Units .repowering with qualifying Clean ^aJJ*d^je^
 year extension for Phase II compliance. Such units may be exempt from New Source
 Review requirements and New Source Performance Standards.
         Conserve5™ ft ^"^«We -Energy; These projects may be allocated a
  portion of up to 300,000 incentive allowances.
    pnn m«1 Technnin^s fCCD: Certain CCT demonstration projects may be
  exempl ; from NSPS, NSR, ^ and Title I nonattainment requirements.

  Monitoring; Requires continuous emission monitors or an equivalent for S02 and
  NOX and also requires opacity and flow monitors.   ,
                           '\\  ^

-------
'.,-.-=•-.-                                     .
                       Title V - Operating Permits


Within 3 years of enactment, States must develop operating permit programs.  EPA
rSews for approval based on regulatory guidelines EPA issues within one year of
enactment,                               _,

Permits will apply to major sources covered under Title I, as well as sources
covered by other titles of the Act.            *

All sources subject to the program must submit permit applications to the state
within 1 year of the effective date  (i.e., date of EPA approval) of Che Mate program.
The state must establish a schedule for acting on initial permit .applications which
assures that at least a third of these submitted applications will be acted upon
annually for 3 years.  -'.'•:"• ".,'.': ''"^^'^'•f:., -. v ";; -'•' •:-/-'1 •'•.-,, -.-;•".:'.,• ; ."•".'• '•-.- .••-.

the state must issue permits for a term of iip to > five years. Permits must include
all Clean Air Act requirements applicable to the source. They must also include a
schedule of compliance and applicable monitoring ai|d reporting requirements.

Sources must pay permit fees to coyer the costs i of the permitting program.
      niust veto a permit if it does not comply with any applicable Clean Air Act  v
'requirements." . ' .  •  • ":•; ;/: • -•. -.'-, .-.' .'  ' •'•••."':;N '•.•:• ": . :-:--/ *' ' -;';J ••'•>• '.'••,.•.  . .-•'••'  '•.-••
      /-  •   . - ^-" '  " :'•    ,-'••' . , ."•   '••:,  ..''*• . '••. ••  ••:•-:-  • '  ..'•'" -••".•/••.  •'•".-•  '
 The public may sue to compel EPA '-to perform nondiscretionary duty if EPA fails to
 veto  a permit that does not ;coinply *wth ^ the Act;  Such cases are reviewable in the
 Federal Court of Appeals.                  :      :              '"•-•'.''''•.

 Once issued, the permit ^ replaces the ^^ otherwise applicable requirements specifically,
 identified in the permit, but EPA may  require that the permit be reopened for
 cause.  A permit with a term of 3 or more years must be reopened if new
 requirements applicable, to the source ",10$ promulgated.

 EPA may impose sanctions if a state fails to resubmit an approvable permit
 program aftet EPA has determined the initial submittal is deficient.

-------
                                                                  K^§sp?
                                                           :-''r:-T\f.^mmmm^^
                                                           \--<--'y-:^'W&?W*ffir-i&$&-
                                                   1        ' ..;.'• ',   . • ;'-Pv «•" •fi'fifST	*a: Vf.>'"'"•*
                                    & Global Climate PWtoc^-Jv.;^';^^|^^
        Title VI - Stratospheric Ozone
                         . • '  " ' ,,
                                :
                       .-.,'••,'

listing: EPA must list specified ozone depleting substances     .
eSone-depletion potential, chlorine/bromine loadings, atmospheric         .
SS^rming potentials within 60 days after enactment. EPA,to add to list at
least every Shears substances meeting specified  criteria.
Phg^p^: Piase^ut dates are simUar to Montr^^
CFCVhalon and carbon tetrachloride; 2002 for methyl chloroform), but wth more
strtogent interim reductions, Class II (HCFG) substances phased out by 2030.
                                                Class I  b  1231.   ,
           :erim reauciumsi v.m»a « v*»vx»-v/ ».»—...—• ^.r—-.™---T -vn-
           for Qass I required within 10 mpnths, ClassII by 12/31/p?.
                           '••',.    -..'••   :,  •.' •• , "_.'"',;". '•" .•'-, :  s:- ' ' '•  .
Exchange; Requires a net environmental benefit from ^^^"W^?^
produce controUed substances. Regulations required within 10 months after

enactment.  _       ;    -..'".•'•. .';••".     ..  ':---;-"--.->'.^  '•  ••••..•-•'••.'.•••:-''••  ••
                                                 ....;
 Keeling/Use Limits; Restricts use and emissions tq,LAER, requires maxunum
 riding and safe disposal for CFC refrigerants within 2 ,ygrs, all Bother class, ^a
 II substances within 4 years. lUegal to vent class I or II refrigerants after 7/1/92.
 Prohibition on venting any envirbnmentally^hannful substitute ; refrigerant .after 5
        '            '        '            '    " '''      "'  "  ''' '"'   '
 years.
 Mobile Air Conditioners; Mandatory recycling after     92. Certification of  ^
 equipment and personnel.  Ban on small containers ^ (except certified ^^ personnel).

 Nnnessential Products. Bans nonessential products that result in releases of class I
 substances within Shears, Beginning 1!?H ban use of class II ^stances in __
 aerosols and non-insulatmg foams, with exemptions for flammability and safety.
 Regulation 1 year after enactment, effective after 2 years.

 Labeling. Mandatory warning labels on all containers of products made with and
 containing class I or class II substances (depending, in some cases, on availability
 of safe alternatives). Regulations required within 18 months  after enactment,
 effective 30 months after.  In case of labeling, requirements applicable to containers
 of Class I and II  substances and to products ^containing Class I substances. AH
 products must be labeled by i015.   "                        .  '

 Safe Alternatives. Requires prior notice of sale of new and existing chemicals for
 significant new use as substitute.  EPA to publish list of safe and unsafe uses of
 substitutes for Class I and II as identified. Gives authority to restrict the use of
 unsafe substitutes.  Rules required within 2 years after enactment.

 Procurement.  Requires all Federal Agencies to amend their procurement regulations
 to maximize the use of safe alternatives for Class I and II substances.  Regulations
 required within 18 months after enactment, effective 30 months after.

 Methane. EPA to publish 5 reports to Congress within 2 years, and 1 follow-up
 report within  4 years.

-------
                               Title VII - Enforcement
o     Enhances Enforceabilitv; Makes the CAA more easily enforceable and consistent
      with recent environmental statutes, like the Clean Water Act and the Resource
      Conservation and Recovery Act. A broad array pf new enforcement authorities, from
      "traffic tickets" to criminal felonies, are provided to better match the penalty to the
      severity; of the violation. However, some changes also liniit enforceinent m hew. ways.
      Violations;  Criminal violations ^ ^ upgraded from misdemeanors to felonies,
      consistent with other environmental statutes. V;         \         : ,     ';
o     New Criminal Sanctions: Wm^^b^                                     negligent
      endangennent in connection with air toxics.;                / ,     c       ^ v

o     Penalties;  EPA may issue adntinistrative, penairy orders up to $200;000 and field
    ',  citations for minor violations' up to $5,000, rather than taking every violation to
      court. EPA may issue administrative subpoenas. Sources may challenge
      •assessments in administrative hearings aiid District Court.;            /,

o      Scope; Duration and scope of emergency orders are expanded.  Authority to issue,
       administrative compliance orders to  sourees is efspanded to authorize schedules of
'• -.•:••  - -up; to 1 year.. '•_;•..'. ,/.;\ . ;-!-.. •':  /.... •.'•. '•'.-•''  '>.:---'.  :  :'. '' :  ." .  '\.--..  ':--  :-  '  • •;-';;

o      Restrictions;  Definitions ^ of the terms >pperator" *nd [ "person", which immunize
       many potential violators from enforcement, are; restricted. :          ;

o      Citizen suit; Provisions are revised to allow courts to assess penalties as well  as
      'enjoin violations. The money  will go to a special U.S. Treasury fund. Money may be
       designated for air compliance activities, or mitigation projects.  District Courts are
       given jurisdiction over suits against EPA for unreasonable delay.

 6     Oversight; Effective federal oversight of citizen suits is provided through additional
       notification requirements.

 o     Punishment; The ability to prove and adequately punish ongoing and recurring
       violations is strengthened because the burden  of proof is on the defendant for the
       purpose of determining penalty liability once the government shows that a violation
  -    has occurred.  Once a violation has been proven, any credible evidence is admissible
       to show that the violation continued.

 o     Contractors; Listing authority (by which violators are baired from receiving
       government contracts, grants and loans) is revised so that all criminal convictions
       result in debarment. EPA is  noj explicitly allowed to use contractors for inspection
       purposes,         ^
                                              7

-------
                  Title VIII - Miscellaneous Provisions
                  ,,/'-*" r" *
          . •  •   '   •.-.'' . • 1                            'I               \
Outer rnntinpntHl' Shelf IOCS); Program to control air pollution from sources on
SSScBffi
same standards as onshore areas.  Exemptions possible if the Admimstrator finds
that compliance Is technologically infeasible or will cause an unreasonable threat to
health and safety. States adjacent to OCS sources may implement and enforce^
requirements if approved by the Administrator. Within 3 years of enactment the
Secretary of the Interior will conduct a study of areas adjacent to Texas, Louisiana,
Mississippi and Alabama, examining the impacts of emissions from Outer
Continental Shelf activities.                      ;  )       /             -
Establishment nf program t» ynnmtor and improve air quality In rePP"? alpngihe
iSrZ between t& T&trf States and Mexico; Programletfectiye ^through July 1,
1995. Monitoring conducted to determine the sources of pollutants for which
NAAQS have been established. The information will be used to aid in the process
of attainment for sources out of compliances with the NAAQS.  The Administrator
can negotiate with Mexican representatives to.reduce thelevelof airborne .   ^
pollutants and achieve NAAQS in regions along the U.S./Mexico border.  Each year
the Administrator will give an annual report to Congress concerning the status of
the program and the progress oif reaching attainment in, border regions.
 Visibility; Each year, for JS years, $ 8 million will be allocated to conduct ^tu
 which wiU identify and evaluate sources and source regions of both visibility
 impairment and Class I regions. Research includes expansion of monitoring m
 Class I areas, assessment^ Sources affecting visibility, adaptation of regional air
 quality models and studies of atmospheric chemistry and physics pertaining to
 visibility. 24 months after enactment, Administrator will conduct an assessment of
 how the Clean Air Act Amendments are affecting Class I areas.  The Administrator
 can establish Visibility Transport Regions if two or more affected states petition the
 Administrator that the interstate transport of air pollutants is negatively affecting
 visibility in Class I areas. In conjunction with the transport region, a commission
 shall be designated. The Commission will evaluate data, studies and information
 pertaining to  adverse impacts on visibility. Based on the evaluation, action may be
 taken to remedy any negative impacts. The Administrator shall establish a Qrand
 Canyon Visibility Transport Commission within 12 months of enactment.


 International Border Areas; Provides that an implementation plan or  revision shall
 be approved by the Administrator if; it meets all of the Act's requirements except
 attainment of NAAQS because of emissions emanating from outside the United
 States.  States that can prove that they cannot meet ozone, CO or PM-10
 attainment levels by, the applicable deadline because of emissions from outside of
 the U.S. shall not be penalized.

 Other Kev Provisions; - Grants For Support of Air Pollution Planning and Control
 Programs, Section 808 - Renewable energy and energy Conservation incentives and
 Section 817 - The Role of Secondary Standards.

-------
       V  •;vi.-/-^         ^  Title IX - Cleaner Research    .,  , ', ' , . ,::.:T} •  •   ',:,•.•'.'.;•'.-'


      Monitoring and modeling; Research calls for improved methods and techniques for
      measuring individual air pollutants and complex mixtures, and for addressing
      urban and regional ozone. Maintenance of a national monitoring network to assess
      the status and trends of air emissions, deposition, air  quality, surface water quality,
      forest conditions and visibility is required.
o     Health effects; !^A will study the short and long-term health effects associated, with
      exposure to air pollutants and develop methods to assess risks from these
      pollutants.  An interagency task force, led by EPA, will coordinate the research.
      EPA is required to prepare environmental health assessments for all listed
      hazardous air, pollutants.         ,

o     Ecosystem; Studies for improving our understanding of ecosystem effects from
      individual and multiple air pollutants, including the effects of air pollution on
      water  quality, forests, biological diversity, and other terrestrial and  aquatic systems
   .   exposed to air pollutants.           •' ••<   ;  /                                  .

o     Accidental Releases; Research calls for improvements in predictive models and   ., :
      ' response technology for accidental releases of dense gases. EPA will oversee the .
      research using the Department of Energy's Liquefied Gaseous Fuels Spill Test
      Facility for .the experimental work.       ;    %    .        .      ;.

o     Pollution Prevention and Emissions Control; Research is required to develop .
      technologies and strategies for air pollution prevention from stationary and area
 •  '•   ''source's..  •'; '• '--.  •.-'. '.::v.'.v    ' '  ~;   .•-"..'-'  ' . '.'"•' ".'-.  .  .....    • '     ' . .        '.; '

o     Ac»d Precipitation Research Program; Continuation of research by an intra-agehcy
      task force.  It will review the status of research activities conducted to date and
      submit to Congress a revised plan that identifies key research gaps and establishes
 "•  ,  a program to address current and future research priorities.  EPA is required to
      sponsor specialized acid deposition  studies  and to have the results of its research
      efforts included in Task Force reports.         .

 o     Clean alternative fuels; Research directs  EPA to identify, characterize and predict
       air emissions and other potential environmental effects associated with alternative
       fuels. EPA is required' to determine the risks and benefits to human health and  the
       environment relative to those from gasoline.                                    .

 o     Other Studies;  Coordinate research with appropriate Federal agencies. Study of
       control technologies used in other industrialized countries. A six million dollar
       research  effort on the effects of acid deposition on waters in the Adirondack region.

-------
          Title XI -Clean Air Employment Transition Assistance
'   • •' .••• ' .    • ••-  .      •••,.'.. •?
; Amends Title III of the Job Partnership
    per year for 1*91-1995 allocated to >JTPA
        A
Tito assdslted workers, the majority of who will likely be high sulfur
coa] I miners* dislocated because of implementation of the acid ram title,
Funding:  Ninety-five percent^ the funding     f^J^S£
programs and the remaining five percent will be used to administer the          .
SSenTof Labor will administer the program. Regulations must be developed
within 180 days of the bill's passage.

Benefits;  In addition to the benefits  currently available to dislocated workers
Sugh JTPA Title III, people will be able to receive job search Allowances,
rSion a^sistSlce; needs related payments and extended monetary assistance.
ESded monetary assistance will be available to ^dislocated workers who have ^
SSausted their unempldyment insurance benefits as long as their are in qualified
training or educational programs.             ;  ,  ;
        c   ™                 ; Currently, JTPA Title IHV can provide the -  .
        mened   ove      because of /constraints in the way the program is
 operated, these benefits are not provided frequently.  Title XI ensures that
 dislocated workers, if eligible, receive benefits.  •

       The intent  for providing further monetary assistance, in the form of needs
       related payments, is so that workers, who are adjusting lo a career .change .
       and are enrolled in training or educational programs that^ceed the period
       of time for which they receive Unemployment Insurance (UI), are able to
       complete training or education with further monetary assistance.

 Eligibility;  Payments will be awarded to a dislocated worker, if he Is. enrolled in
 training or an educational program, and either he pr a member of his family has an
 income level below the state poverty income level. Payments will be equivalent to
 either the amount a person was receiving from their UI, or enough so as to bnng
 the person  up to the poverty level.

-------
CLEAN AIR ACT AMENDMENTS OF 19(90
       GLOSSARY OF TERMS
              U.S. EPA
            November 15,1990

-------

-------
Acid  Deposition•>.  t*'Apid  Rain"J,  -- i A   cbmplex,  chemical :,and
atmospheric-phenomenon ^that pccu>^ w^                           ;•
nitrogen^ compounds and- pth^substsnces are>transformed^ chemical
processes;in the atmosphere:, y of ten far-from the original sources^
and then -.

Attainment Ar«a. — An area considered to  have  ?iir  quality as good
as  or better than the National Ambient Air Quality Standards as
defined  in the Clean Air  Act.   An area may be an attainment  area
for one  pollutant ihd a nori^attainment area for others.

B«st Availmbl«  Cpntrol M«aaur« (BAqM>*— A term  used in the House
bill  referring to the "bfest" measures (according to EPA guidance)
fdr coritroliing small or dispersed sources of  particulate matter,
such  as  roadway dust;  woodstoves, and open burning.

carbon Xonpzid* (CO).  ~ A colorless, odorless gas which  is toxic
because -of  its tendency to reduce the oxygen-carrying  capacity of
,,the blood.   ,   •''.'"''•,,-'•. •  ' ;V •• ...''••    r-  -   •'-.••'';'  • ",  ._•'.. ''. '-..

Clean Coal  T«Phnology. -- Any  technology  not in'.widespread use as
of the date of enactment of the Clean Air Act amendments which will
achieve significant reductions in pollutants  associated with the
burning of coal.

Cl«an Fu«l».  —,  Blends  and/or substitutes  for gasoline  fuels.
These  include compressed  natural  gas,,  methanol,  ethanol,  and
•others.  '•./••'',..  •   '•;. .-.  •..  : _    ',     '''•'-   • •' . .           •''"•',

 Cok« Ov«n.  --An industrial process which converts cpal into coke,
which is one of the basic materials used in blast furnaces for the
 conversion of iron ore into iron.      '

 Cold T«Bp«rmtur«  CO. — A standard for automobile  emissions of
 carbon  monoxide  (CO)  to-be  met  at  a  low temperature (i.e.,  20
 degrees F.).  conventional catalytic converters are less efficient
 upon start-up at  low  temperatures.

-------
Control Technique* Guideline  (CTG) i  —Guidance documents issued
bv EPA which define reasonably available ;c6ntrpl technology (RACT)
to £ «»iud tb "existing  facilities, that* emit certain threshold
quantities of air pollutants;  .they contain Information both on the
economic and technological feasibility of available techniques.
                                      "'""'    '
CFC.  (Chlorof luorocarbpns) .  — A family of  inerl^^nc^xic^ and
easily-liquefied chemicals used in refrigeration^ air conditioning,,
packaging?  insulation,  or as solvents  or  aerosol propellants.
Because CFCs are not destroyed in the lower atmosphere they dr if J
into  the upper  atmosphere  where  the ^chlorine is  released and
destroys ozone.    ..          '  " -.'•   _•: " >,-'-.:'    .  - ...;;.  '  ' \. •••'..;'.  '

CFC-12.  —  A chlorofluorocarbbn with a  trademark name .of Freon,
commonly used in refrigeration and  automobilfe air .conditioning.   :

Emission Control  Diagnostics » — Computerized  devipes placed ^on
vehicles to detect malfunction of emissions /controls and notify the
owner of the need  for repair.          .-              .      ^     "

Enhanced inspection  ft  Maintenance  (Enhanced IftM) .  -- An ^improved
automobile  inspection and maintenance program that  includes,  as a
minimum, increases in  coverage of vehicle types and model years,
tighter stringency of inspections and improved management practices
to  ensure  more  effectiveness .   This  may  also include, annual^
computerized.  
-------
Inspection « Maintenance XI*M). — A program providing for periodic
 inspect ions-of motor vehicles to ensure that emissions of specified
 pollutants are  not exceeding established limitations.

 Lov NOx Burners. —.One of several, combustion technologies used to
 reduce emissi6ns;of NOx.        '                       ,

 Maximum  Achievable-  Control  Technology   (MACT).~ ,~  Emissions/
 limitations based on the,-best demonstrated  control technology or
 practices  in  similar  sources  to be  applied  to major  sources
 emitting one or more of the listed toxic pollutants.

 Montreal Protocol.— An international environmental agreement to
 control chemicals  that  deplete the  ozone layer.  The protocolfj
 which was renegotiated in June 1990, calls for a phase-out of CFCs,
 haloris, and carbon tetrachldride by the year 2000,-a phase-out of
 'chloroform by  2005,  and  provides financial  assistance to  help
 developing  countries ;malce  the  transition  from  ozone-depleting
'substances..'/  '"'-"'\-''.'""--. .- •''  /••>. -- '•• : .  ••'''. -   ....-.,.- ; >'  -••'-•• •.• ' • ;-

 NOx (Nitrogen Oxides). --Chemical compounds containing nitrogen
 and  oxygen;    reacts with volatile organic  compounds/  in the
 presence of heat and  sunlight to  form ozone.   It is also a major
 precursor to acid Jraih.   Nationwide; approximately 45. percent of
 NOx emissions come from mobile  sources,  35  percent from electric
 utilities, and is percent from industrial fuel combustion.

- Onboard Controls.••>- beyices placed on vehicles to capture,gasoline
 vapor during refueling and then route the vapors to the engine when
 the vehicle is started;so that they  can be efficiently burned.

 Oxygenated Fuel»i— Gasoline which has been blended with alcohols
 *or ethers  that  contain .oxygen in order to reduce carbon monoxide
 and other emissions.   ,                           .

 Oione. ~ A compound consisting of three oxygen atoms> that is the
 primary  constituent  of  smog.    It   is  formed  through chemical
 reactions  in the atmosphere involving volatile organic compounds,
 nitrogen  oxides,  and sunlight.   Ozone can initiate damage to the
 lungs  as well as damage to  trees,  crops,  and  materials.  There is
 a natural layer of ozone in the upper atmosphere which shields the
 earth  from harmful ultraviolet  radiation.

 PM-10.  — A new  standard  for  measuring the  amount  of solid or
 liquid matt.er  suspended in  the  atmosphere ("particulate matter").
 Refers to .the  amount of particulate  matter  over 10 micrometers  in
 diameter.   The smaller  PM-10 particles  penetrate to the  deeper
 portions  of the lung, affecting sensitive population groups such
 as  children and people with respiratory diseases.

-------
                                                      r
Reasonably Available Control Measurec (RACM) . -- A ;broadly defined
term referring to technologies and other measures that can be Used
to  control pollution;    includes  Reasonably Available  Control,
Technology and other measures.  In the .case of PM-JLO,, it refers to
approaches for  controlling small or dispersed source categories
such as road dust -, woodstoves, and open burning,,

Reasonably Available control  Technology XRACT) .  -- .-An..' emission
limitation on existing sources in non-attainment  areas, defined by
EPA  in  a Control  Techniques  Guideline  (CTG)  and  adopted and
implemented by States .  "  '; '  • , ;. -' '-•''.'• x V :'  -'•.,•'  •   ••••.••'••• • ' -:, •'.•'- .'
Reformulated  Gasoline.  — Gasoline with a different
from conventional gasoline (e.g., lower aromatics content) and that
results in the production ! of lower. levels  of air pollutants.

Repowering. —  The >- replacement of an existing coal-fired  boiler
with  one or  more clean coal  technologies ,  in  Order to achieve
significantly  greater  emission -reduction  relative   to  ^the
performance of technology in widespread use as of the enactment of
the Clean Air Act amendments.             s  , '            '

Residual  Risk.   -* The guantity  of  health risk remaining  after
application of the MACT (Maximum Achievable Control Technology) .

Sanctions. — Actions taken against a State or local government by
the Federal government for failure to plan or  to implement  a SIP.
Examples  include withholding  of highway funds   and  a  ban  on
construction  of  new sources.    .

Stage II Controls. ~ Systems placed  on service ;station gasoline
pumps to control and capture  gasoline vapors during  automobile
refueling.    ',     • '•  , '           - ,  - v _.''"'...',/  • -'  -   '     •,.

State implementation Plan, (SIP) .  —  Documents prepared by states,
and submitted to EPA for approval ,  which identifies actions and
programs to  be  undertaken by  the State and  its  subdivisions to
 implement their responsibilities under the Clean Air Act.

 Sulfur Dioxide  (SO2). — A heavy, pungent, colorless air pollutant
 formed primarily by the  combustion of fossil fuels.   It  is a
 respiratory  irritant, especially  for asthmatics  and is the major
 precursor to the  formation of acid rain

 Transportation  Control Kea»ure»  (TCM»i .  ~  Steps  taken  by a
 locality to . adjust traffic patterns (e.g.,  bus lanes, right  turn
 on red) or reduce vehicle use  (rideshar ing, high-occupancy  vehicle
 lanes) to reduce  vehicular emissions of air pollutants,

 Vehicle Miles Travelled (VKT) . ~ A  measure  of both the  volume and
 extent Of motor vehicle operation;   the total number of  vehicle
 miles travelled within a specif ied geographical area (whether the
 entire country or a smaller -area) over a  given period of time.

-------
        e broanic Compounds  (VOCa).  —r A group  of chemicals that
       in tS^tmosphere  with nitrogen oxides in the presence of.
 heat and flight  to form ozone;   does not  include methane and
 oXer^^SnpoS^determihedbyEPA to have negligible photochemical
 reactivity.   Examples of  VOCs include gasoline fumes  and oil-based

•paints'. ,-'..!;      / . ;..   : '''  .:" >   - ' .     '        •"'-'.• t

-------

-------
CLEAN MR ACT AMENDMENTS OF 1990

     LECISLATIVE CHRONOLOGY
              U.S.EPA
            November 15,1990

-------

-------
              C!H1M>NOLOCT OT^
o     JUNE 12, 1989 -President Bush announces the Administration's clean air proposal
      which comprehensively addresses three areas »f environmental  concern:  acid
      deposition, toxic air pollution, and urban air quality        :

o     JULY 21, 1589 - the legislative language interpreting the President's proposal is
      submitted to Congress

o     JULY 27, 1589 - the Administration's bill is introduced by House Energy and
      Commerce Committee  Chairman John Dingell  (P-MI) as H.R. 3030 with 146
      cosponsors (eventually 166); the measure is subsequently referred to the Energy and
      Commerce Committee           :

b     AUGUST 3, 1989 — the Administration's bill is introduced in the Senate by Senator
      John Chafee (R-RI) as S. 1490 with 24 cosponsors (eventually 25); the measure is
      subsequently referred to the Senate Environment and Public Works  Committee
 !   •"  _.   :.••';;.•'.' '  .' ' '• ; _ '. ..'•.:.''•• ;   "•'•;.'  "•.",.   "     •/•'•  • '     • .' .
o     SEPTEMBER 13, 1989 - Health and Environment  Subcommittee  of the House
      Energy and Commerce Committee holds first of 11 mark-ups on H.R. 3030 that
      continue through October 11, 1989

o     OCTOBER .11, 1989 -Health and Environment Subcommittee of House Energy and
      Commerce held their final  mark-up of the Administration's bill (H.R. 3030); the
      measure, as amended, is sent to full Committee by a 21-0 vote

o     OCTOBER  26,  1989 — Environmental  Protection  Subcommittee of  Senate
      Environment and Public Works begins process of marking-up clean  air legislation

o     NOVEMBER  14, 1989 — Environmental  Protection  Subcommittee of  Senate
      Environment and Public Works votes to include an Acid Rain title which is based
      on the Administration's original proposal; the Subcommittee had no  further action
      on S. 1630

o     NOVEMBER 16, 1989 — Senate Environment and Public Works votes out a Clean
      Air bill (S. 1630) by a 15 - 1 margin

o     JANUARY 23, 1990  - Floor debate begins in the U.S. Senate

o   .  FEBRUARY  1, 1990 —   a  group  of bipartisan Senators begin  meeting  with
      Administration officials  in a month-long, closed door  negotiation session  on
      amendments to S. 1630; during which, Senate floor debate is put  on hold

 o     MARCH 5, 1990 — Senator George .Mitchell announces agreement  with the
      Administration on several key aspects of clean air; this measure is the product of
      the Administration and bipartisan Senate negotiations during February and served
      as the vehicle for Senate floor deliberation (it would  eventually become S.  1630)
                                                        1 *        "        •
 o     MARCH 14,  1990  —  Energy and Power Subcommittee  of House Energy  and
      Commerce reports  H.R. 3030  out  to full committee;  the  Subcommittee  had
      jurisdiction over the alternative  fuels and acid rain provisions in the bill,  but the
      Chairman decided not to mark-up /  amend ther measure

-------
                                      _,
      MARCH H 1990 - House Committee on Energy and Commerce begins public
      mark-up of HJL 3030                      -                           ',-*•
                   •  '   " '•     .  ' " '      ! '           u
      APRIL 3,1990 - the Senate votes out the dent Air Act Amendm'ents of 1990} the
         isorewtoassedby a voteof 89- 1L Tbe following Senators voted against,final
          -   ,^.w  *\« •«  w»  s  »%_ _»__*_«—• £_n«-'ItS-v^M* ^VA/"II«M* , C*iaa»M>g ff2.oni • fZumii
      passage of ike bill: Btyid, Rockefeller,
      Helms, NIcHes, mm& Wallop,       ;,  ,„.  ^,;,. •-. - •• • ..,••• .•  .••..••,   (  •• .•;,-•   •.  •.,.. • -: ^ • .-.

o     MAY 17 1990 — House Committee on Energy and Commerce reports H.R. 3030 out
      of committee by a vote of 42 - 1}  the measure then moved to the entire House of
      Representatives      '     .      •   : ' " ;.,,.;-=/'  ',• ;' /  •"'V''   _'-..  '•'•'..'...'•'.'  •/• •'•'.•''.•'•

o     MAY 17, 1990  - House Committee on PubUc Works and Transportaton and the
      House  Committee on Wa^s and Means were given sequential  referral of certain
      aspects of HLR. 3030; both committees report the bill out on May 21,1990

o     MAY 17,1990 — House Committee on Ways and Means receives sequential referral of H.R.
      3030 for a period ending no later than May 21,1990

o     MAY 23,1990- the House of Representatives votes top^aiiewaean AirActby/ayote
      of 401-21  '"_     ;   '.  "  "  ;•  ''.   "   :•'..••.•••'.';."• \":--   .*  ::[.•   ,,','/,;','.. ':<•:..

o     JUNE  6,1990 — the Senate announces their conferees for the Clean Air Act Amendments
      of 1990. they are as follows: Senators Quentin Burdick (D-ND)* Daniel Patrick Moynihan
      (D-NY), George Mitchell (D-ME),MaxBaucus (D-MT), John Chafee (R-RI), Alan Simpson
      (R-WY), David Durenberger (RrMN)  as vfell as Uoyd Bentsen (D-TX) and Bob Packwood
      (R-OR) of the  Finance Committee for the fee-related provisions ontyj all other conferees
      are Senate Environment and  Public Works Committee members

o     JUNE 28,1990 — the House of Representatives announces their conferees for the Clean Air
      Act Amendments of 1990 - the list includes 138 House Members overall vdth representation
      from seven committees, the six committees'Other than the Energy and Commerce will have
      jurisdiction over their individual areas

o     July 13,1990 -' House and Senate Clean Air Conferees hold their first joint conference.
      During the first session, the conferees  selected Senator Max Baucus (D-MT)  as the
      Conference Chairman

o     October 22,1990 - House and Senate Clean Air Conferees reach final agreement on Clean
      Air reauthorization and thus conclude conference negotiations

o     October 26,1990 - The House of Representatives considers the conference report and
      passes the measure with a 401 - 25 roll call vote

o     October 27,1990—The Senate considers the conference report and passes the measure with
      an 89  - 10 roll call vote                        ,

o     November 13,1990 - S. 1630, "The Clean Ah- Act Amendments of 1990," is submitted to
      the President

 o     November 15,1990 — The President signs the Clean Air Act Amendments

-------