United States        Office of Research and     EPA/600/R-01/007a
          Environmental Protection    Development         March 2001
          Agency           Washington DC 20460
&EPA     Multispecies Reactive
          Tracer Test in a Sand and
          Gravel Aquifer,
          Cape Cod, Massachusetts
          Parti
          Experimental Design and
          Transport of Bromide and
          Nickel-EDTA Tracers

-------
                                            EPA/600/R-01/007a
                                                March 2001
Multispecies  Reactive Tracer Test in a
        Sand and  Gravel Aquifer,
       Cape Cod, Massachusetts
                     Part 1
 Experimental Design and Transport of
    Bromide and Nickel-EDTA Tracers
       J. A. Davis1, K. M. Hess2, J. A. Coston1, D. B. Kent1, J. L. Joye1,
               P. Brienen1 and K. W. Campo2

                   1 U.S. Geological Survey
                   Menlo Park, CA 94025

                   2 U.S. Geological Survey
                   Northborough, MA 01532
               Interagency Agreement DW14935626
                     Project Officer
                     Robert W. Puls
           Subsurface Protection and Remediation Division
           National Risk Management Research Laboratory
                     Ada, OK 74820
           National Risk Management Research Laboratory
              Office of Research and Development
              U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                   Cincinnati, OH 45268

-------
                                Notice
The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency through its Office of Research and
Development partially funded and  collaborated in the  research described  here
under Interagency Agreement DW14935626. It has been subjected to the Agency's
peer and administrative review and  has been approved for publication as an EPA
document.  Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute
endorsement or recommendation for use.

All research  projects making conclusions or recommendations based on environ-
mentally related measurements and funded by the Environmental Protection Agency
are required  to participate in the Agency Quality Assurance Program. This project
was conducted under an approved Quality Assurance Project Plan. The proce-
dures specified in this plan were used without exception. Information on the plan
and documentation of the quality assurance activities and results are available from
the Principal Investigator.

-------
                                             Foreword
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is charged by Congress with protecting the Nation's land, air, and water
resources. Under a mandate of national environmental laws, the Agency strives to formulate and implement actions
leading to a compatible balance between human activities and the ability of natural systems to support and nurture
life.   To meet this mandate,  EPA's research  program  is providing data and technical support for solving
environmental problems today and  building  a science knowledge base necessary to manage our ecological
resources wisely, understand how pollutants affect our health, and  prevent or reduce  environmental risks in the
future.

The  National  Risk Management Research Laboratory (NRMRL)  is the Agency's center for investigation of
technological and management approaches for preventing and reducing risks from pollution that threatens human
health and  the environment.  The focus of the Laboratory's research program is  on methods and their cost-
effectiveness for prevention and control of pollution to air, land, water, and subsurface resources; protection of water
quality in public water systems; remediation of contaminated sites, sediments and ground water; prevention and
control of indoor air pollution; and restoration of ecosystems. NRMRL collaborates with  both public and private sector
partners to foster technologies that reduce the cost of compliance and to anticipate emerging problems. NRMRL's
research provides solutions to environmental problems by:  developing and promoting  technologies that protect and
improve the  environment; advancing scientific and engineering information  to support regulatory  and policy
decisions; and providing the technical support and information transfer to ensure implementation of environmental
regulations and strategies at the national, state, and community levels.

The use of multispecies reactive transport modeling  in site assessments and remedial  performance monitoring at
hazardous waste sites is to be  encouraged. These can be valuable tools for simulating processes which govern
contaminant fate and transport in the subsurface. A  competent reactive transport model of a site must be able to
simulate the processes that occur between water and the vapor and solid phases in contact with the water. The
accuracy of such simulations will be dependent on the database contained within such models as well as the quality
of the site-specific data collection  efforts.

The lessons learned from the large-scale tracer tests and subsequent modeling investigations from this study have
implications that go far beyond  the particular contaminant species studied here. For homogeneous and  classical
heterogeneous reactions (e.g., dissolution equilibria), there are generally available equilibrium constants that may be
used with confidence in such models;  however, solubilities for poorly crystalline or impure solid phases are generally
not available and will have to be determined using  site-specific materials. Adsorption and other heterogeneous
surface reactions will generally require experimental determination of parameters that are site-specific. In  addition,
chemical reactions can be rate-limited and controlled by physical factors such as diffusion or mixing of waters across
sediment layers. These studies were important in identifying the limitations of reactive transport modeling, their
utility, and where additional data collection and testing is warranted.
                                                   Stephen G. Schmelling, Acting Director
                                                   Subsurface Protection and Remediation Division
                                                   National Risk Management Research Laboratory

-------
IV

-------
                                     Executive  Summary


Constructing an accurate and predictive mathematical simulation of reactive transport of metal ions in groundwater
requires detailed knowledge about metal ion solubility and sorption under the local geochemical conditions of the
aquifer. While distribution coefficients may be sufficient to describe sorption for simulations under constant chemical
conditions, the surface complexation model approach is better suited when chemical conditions vary. However, both
approaches suffer from a lack of datasets collected under aquifer-scale temporal and spatial dimensions.

A comprehensive field investigation of multispecies  reactive transport under variable chemical conditions was
conducted in  a shallow, unconfined sand and gravel aquifer on Cape Cod, Massachusetts. Nearly ten thousand
liters of groundwater with additional tracers were injected into the aquifer.  The distribution of tracers was monitored
for over a year as the tracers were transported over 200 meters through an array of multilevel samplers. The added
tracers were comprised of a nonreactive solute Br (bromide ion) and the reactive  solutes Cr(VI) (chromium in the
plus six oxidation state), and EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) complexes of four divalent metal cations: Cu
(copper), Ni (nickel), Pb (lead), and Zn (zinc).  A small excess of EDTA was added to ensure that the speciation of
the metal ions was dominated by anionic EDTA complexes.  Transport was quantified using spatial moments
compiled from comprehensive synoptic samplings of the tracer cloud and temporal  moments (breakthrough curves)
of concentration data collected at two MLS.

Variable geochemical conditions in the aquifer resulted from the presence of a  plume of sewage-contaminated
groundwater overlain by  pristine recharge groundwater. The pristine zone  had  high dissolved oxygen concentra-
tions, pH values in the range of 5.4 to 5.7 and low dissolved salt concentrations.  The sewage-contaminated zone
was suboxic and mildly reducing with DO (dissolved oxygen) concentrations less than 3 micromolar and pH values
in the range of 6.0- to 6.5, and increased dissolved salt concentrations including sewage-derived contaminants such
as  phosphate and borate.   Gradients in dissolved  solutes were present between  the  pristine  and sewage-
contaminated zones over an approximately 2.5 meter thick interval.  A portion of the sewage-contaminated zone
near the upper boundary had elevated concentrations of both dissolved and adsorbed Zn. The tracers were injected
over a vertical  interval  that  spanned all the geochemical conditions (pristine, Zn-contaminated,  and sewage-
contaminated zones). Injection of the tracers into the aquifer resulted in some minor changes in aquifer chemistry,
but these changes had little influence on the transport of reactive tracers after the first few weeks of the experiment.

The spatial extent of the distribution of Br increased over time, due to the physical processes of dispersion and
sinking caused  by the density difference between the tracer cloud and the ambient groundwater.  The greatest
dispersion was observed in the direction of flow. Bromide traveled a slightly curved path, caused by a change in the
direction of groundwater flow during the test.

Metal exchange reactions, in which the metal ion  of one of the injected metal-EDTA complexes was displaced by
another cation such as Fe, Al orZn, were expected to affect the distribution of the injected metal-EDTA tracers. Little
or no metal exchange with the Ni-EDTA complexes occurred during the test.  Although there was an initial loss of
dissolved Ni mass from the cloud (by about 14%), Ni-EDTA transport was nearly conservative during the tracer test.
The loss was attributed to reversible adsorption of the Ni-EDTA complex onto the aquifer solids and not to exchange
reactions.  A similar trend was found for EDTA (as the total of all the complexes present).

Ni-EDTA was retarded the least of the injected tracers (the average retardation factor was 1.2).   Adsorption of
anionic solutes was favored under the lower pH and dissolved salt concentrations characteristic of the pristine zone
in this aquifer. Retardation factors (Rf) calculated from temporal samplings conducted in the different aquifer zones
showed that Ni-EDTA was indeed more strongly retarded under pristine zone conditions relative to  bromide (Rf  =
2.07).

-------
VI

-------
                                    Contents
Foreword	iii
Executive Summary	v
Tables	viii
Figures	ix
Abbreviations	xi
SI Conversion Factors	xii
Acknowledgments	xiii
Introduction	1
Site Description and Aquifer Characteristics	2
   Hydrogeologic Characteristics	2
   Chemical Characteristics	3
   Definition of Geochemical Zones	3
   Design and Objectives of the Natural Gradient Injection	3
       Description of injection procedures	4
       Sample types	4
       Sampling the tracer test	5
Aqueous Chemistry Analyses	5
   Field Site Measurements	5
   Bromide Measurements	6
   Dissolved Metals Analyses	6
Methods for Calculation of Moments	6
   Spatial Moments	6
   Temporal Moments	7
Results and Discussion	7
   Bromide Transport	7
   Spatial-Moments Analysis for Bromide	8
   Temporal-Moments Analysis for Bromide	8
   Comparison of Bromide Results to an Earlier Tracer Test (1985-88)	9
   Tracer-induced Perturbations in Groundwater pH Values	9
   EDTA Speciation	 10
   Comparison Between Ni, EDTA, and Br Transport	11
Summary	12
References	13
                                          VII

-------
                                        Tables
Table 1.    Description of the Injectate and Injection Statistics	17
Table 2.    Data from an Injection MLS and Three MLS 1.4 to 2 m from the
           Injection Center One Day after Injection 	18
Table 3.    Sample Types and Chemical Data Collected	19
Table 4.    Summary of Analytical Methods	20
Table 5.    Br Data Summary for Breakthrough MLS: BT1 and BT2	21
                                       VIM

-------
                                        Figures
Figure 1.    Location of tracer-test site, area of sewage-contaminated groundwater,
           and general water-table contours, western Cape Cod, Massachusetts	23
Figure 2.    Longitudinal cross sections showing the distributions of various water
           quality parameters in the aquifer in April 1993 just prior to the field experiment	24
Figure 3.    Locations of the general path of tracers, the multilevel samplers (MLS)
           available for sampling during the tracer test, the six injection MLS,
           the two breakthrough curve MLS, and the MLS used to construct background
           chemistry transects and to define the extent of zinc contamination	25
Figure 4.    Generalized longitudinal cross section showing the spatial relationships
           between the different aquifer zones defined  in the study	26
Figure 5.    Mapped distributions of the maximum Brand Ni concentrations of each
           MLS forthe synoptic samplings at 13 and 83 days after the injection	27
Figure 6.    Longitudinal and vertical extents of Br and Ni concentrations observed
           13 and 83 days after injection	28
Figure 7.    Calculated Br mass (zeroth moment) for each synoptic sampling	28
Figure 8.    (A) Calculated distance from the center of injection to the center of mass of
           Br (first moment) for each synoptic sampling.  (B) Comparison of distances
           calculated in this (1993) and earlier (1985-87; Garabedian et al, 1991)
           experiments	29
Figure 9.    Water-table altitude measured in observation well FSW 343-36
           (1.17 m, -46.66 m) and water-table gradient direction and magnitude
           calculated from water-table altitudes measured in three observation
           wells (FSW 343-36, FSW 382-32 (66.57 m,  127.58 m), and FSW414-36
           (-87.17m, 98.69m)) at tracer-test site for 1993-94	29
Figure 10.  Calculated location of the  center of mass of Br (first moment) for
           each synoptic sampling	30
Figure 11.  Calculated altitude of the center of mass of Br (first moment) for each synoptic
           sampling is shown as a function of the distance transported downgradient from
           the injection and relative to the Zn-contaminated region	30
Figure 12.  Typical pattern of breakthrough for Br, Ni, and EDTA. Concentrations normalized
           by dividing by the injection concentrations	31
Figure 13.  Comparison of water-table gradients calculated for this (1993) and earlier
           (1985-87; LeBlanc et al, 1991) experiments	32
Figure 14.  Comparison of calculated  altitude of center of mass of Br for each synoptic
           sampling for this (1993) and earlier (1985-87; Garabedian et al., 1991)
           experiments	32
Figure 15.  Concentration versus time plots at a sampling port in the pristine zone (13.0 m
           above mean sea level) at  a distance 1.7 m downgradient from the center of the
           array of injection MLS	33
Figure 16.  Breakthrough curves (BT1, Figure 3,  37 m downgradient) from the pristine zone
           (12.1 m above mean sea  level) for K, Na, Ca, Mg (scale on left-hand side) and
           for pH (scale on right-hand side)	33
Figure 17.  Concentration versus time plots at a sampling port in the transition zone
           (10.8 m above mean sea  level) at a distance 1.7 m downgradient from the
           center of the array of injection MLS	34
                                              IX

-------
Figure 18.  Correlation between the sum of the concentrations of dissolved Cu, Ni, Zn, Pb, Al,
           and Fe, and measured EDTA concentrations	35
Figure 19.  Mass distribution of metals complexed with EDTA in the tracer cloud as a
           function of time after injection	35
Figure 20.  Calculated altitudes of the centers of mass of Br and Ni (first moments)
           for each synoptic sampling relative to the horizontal distance traveled	36
Figure 21.  (A) Calculated Br, EDTA, and Ni masses (zeroth moments) for each synoptic
           sampling  normalized by the total mass of injected tracer.  (B) Relative mass
           of Ni and  EDTA calculated by dividing the normalized mass by the normalized
           Br mass for each synoptic sampling	36
Figure 22.  Calculated distances from the center of injection to the center of mass of Br and
           Ni (first moments) for each synoptic sampling	37
Figure 23.  Calculated location  of the centers of mass of Br and Ni (first moments) for
           each synoptic sampling	37
Figure 24.  Transport parameters for EDTA and Ni at BT1 and BT2	38

-------
                         Abbreviations
d             Day
DO           dissolved oxygen
EDTA         ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
g             Grams
ICP-AES       inductively-coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy
kg            Kilograms
km           Kilometers
L             Liters
m            Meter
u,g            Micrograms
u,M           Micromoles per liter
mg           Milligrams
mM           Millimoles per liter
mm           Millimeters
M            Moles
MLS          multilevel sampler
nm           Nanometers
QC           quality control
                                  XI

-------
SI Conversion Factors
Multiply
Area:

Flow rate:


Length:

Mass:

Volume:



Temperature:
Concentration:


Pressure:

Heating value:

English (US)
Units by
1 ft2
1 in2
1 gal/min
1 gal/min
1 MGD
1 ft
1 in
1 Ib
1 Ib
1 ft3
1 ft3
1gal
1gal
°F-32
1 gr/ft3
1 gr/gal
1 Ib/ft3
1 Ib/in2
1 Ib/in2
Btu/lb
Btu/scf
Factor
0.0929
6.452
6.31 x10-5
0.0631
43.81
0.3048
2.54
453.59
0.45359
28.316
0.028317
3.785
0.003785
0.55556
2.2884
0.0171
16.03
0.07031
6894.8
2326
37260
Metric (SI)
to get Units
m2
cm2
m3/s
L/s
L/s
m
cm
g
kg
L
m3
L
m3
°C
g/m3
g/L
g/L
kg/cm2
Newton/m2
Joules/kg
Joules/scm
       XII

-------
                       Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Drs.  B. Bekins, J. Friedly, and J. Zobrist for critical technical
reviews of the report. Numerous people contributed to the field and laboratory work
reported here. Technical and field assistance were provided by S. Coppola, W.
Carothers, G. Granato, M. Kohler, M.  Kruger, J. Masterson, T. McCobb, B. Mitch,
B. Rea-Kumler, and J. Savoie, sometimes under unfavorable conditions. C. Ogle
(Ogle Tooling) and  M.  Fitzgerald (Design  Craft  Woodworks)  provided  critical
assistance in the design and construction of the apparatus used for processing
"Chelex" samples. S. Wallace conducted laboratory experiments on chemical
interactions between EDTA and aquifer sediments described in the text. C. Fuller
and L. Anderson provided technical advice on experimental design, sampling, and
analysis at various stages during the project. The numerous contributions of Denis
LeBlanc, USGS Cape Cod Groundwater Research Site Coordinator, and Dr.  Robert
Puls, Project Officer, Subsurface Protection  and  Remediation Division,  National
Risk Management Research  Laboratory, Office of Research and Development,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, are gratefully acknowledged. Funding for
the project was provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Research and Development, through interagency agreement number DW14935626
and the U.S. Geological  Survey Toxic Substances Hydrology Program.
                                   XIII

-------
                                           Introduction
In the past decade many reactive transport models have been developed to describe the effects of chemical reactions on
the transport of solutes (e.g., Liu and Narasimhan, 1989; Yeh and Tripathi, 1991; Parkhurst, 1995; Curtis and Rubin,
submitted). The reactivity of inorganic solutes depends strongly on chemical speciation; species that precipitate or are
extensively adsorbed are highly retarded, whereas species that are soluble and weakly adsorbed  can be mobile in
groundwater (Davis etal., 1993). Much of the discussion about these models has been concerned with the most efficient
mathematical coupling of transport equations (partial differential equations) with the algebraic equations that describe
chemical reactions at equilibrium (e.g., see Yeh and Tripathi, 1989; and Rubin, 1990). Other issues of interest in model
development have included: 1) the validity of the assumption of local chemical equilibrium, 2) the comprehensiveness of
the models in terms of complex geochemical and  hydrophysical processes (e.g., Yeh and Tripathi, 1989), and 3) the
capability of treating a combination of mixed chemical equilibria and chemical rate expressions.

While it appears that considerable advances are being made in the development of mathematical algorithms, many
practical problems remain  if reactive  transport models  are to  be applied  to groundwater systems in  predictive
simulations. For example, adsorption reactions require special considerations. Some reactive transport models have
relied on empirical parameters, such as distribution coefficients  or isotherms  determined in laboratory studies, to
describe retardation of solutes during transport. While this approach  may be satisfactory under constant chemical
conditions, the surface complexation modeling approach will provide better results under conditions of variable chemistry
(Kent etal., 2000a, Davis etal., 1998; Kohleretal., 1996; Davis and Kent, 1990). Adsorption is affected by competitive
adsorption  processes (Stollenwerk, 1995), solute speciation changes (Waite et al., 1994), and other factors under
conditions of variable chemical conditions. In the surface complexation approach, adsorption is considered as a set of
one or more chemical reactions involving an aqueous species, a surface site  on the porous medium, and protons. In
principle, reactions are required for each adsorbing solute, however, laboratory data  may be used to minimize the
number of reactions needed for a transport modeling application. Examples of reactive transport models that have used
the surface complexation approach are those of Cederberg etal. (1985), Hostetleretal. (1989), Yeh and Tripathi (1991),
Kohler et al. (1996), Stollenwerk (1998),  and Kent et al. (2000a).

Despite recent developments in reactive transport modeling, the application of such models and computer codes to real-
world problems  is still limited by the lack of relevant kinetic and thermodynamic data for describing appropriate sorption
and  redox  reactions  in the environment. Further advances in this  area  will require the development of operating
paradigms for field problems, perhaps including approaches for estimating a distribution of significant model parameters
using site-specific materials. However, current experimental procedures with site-specific materials involve studies with
short contact times (batch studies), small samples (less than a kilogram), and for column studies, short path lengths (less
than  one meter), as compared to the time and space dimensions of real systems.  Questions remain concerning the
applicability of chemical parameters determined in laboratory studies to model simulations of solute transport in large
field studies.

In this report, we summarize a portion of the results of a large-scale tracer test conducted at the U. S. Geological Survey
research site on Cape Cod, Massachusetts.  The site  is located on a large sand and gravel glacial outwash plain in an
unconfined aquifer. In April 1993, about 10,000 liters of groundwater from the site were injected  into the shallow aquifer
with  bromide (Br), chromate (Cr(VI)), and four metals (lead  (Pb),  copper (Cu), nickel (Ni),  zinc (Zn)) complexed with
ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) added as tracers.  At the time of the tracer test, shallow groundwater at the site
was  contaminated by secondary sewage effluent that was discharged since 1936 onto infiltration beds located about
240 m (meters)  upgradient of the injection wells. Vertical concentration gradients in dissolved oxygen, pH, dissolved Zn,
and other water quality parameters are caused by the  mixing of the sewage effluent with ambient groundwater (Kent et
al., 1994).  The experiment was carried out such  that the water with tracers would be injected across these vertical
gradients in water quality. Thus, the mobility of the tracers under variable chemical conditions could be compared and
the fate of the tracers in response to different chemical processes could be contrasted. The main objectives of the
experiment were:

-------
    1.  to demonstrate the importance of chemical reactions,  aqueous  speciation, and  variable background
       chemical conditions on the transport of selected toxic elements (Cr, Pb, Cu, Zn, Ni) in groundwater;
    2.  to compare the rates and extents of chemical reactions observed in a field study with those measured under
       similar conditions in laboratory experiments;
    3.  to examine the relationships between chemical and hydrologic processes in solute transport;
    4.  to examine the  importance of the spatial variability of geochemical properties and its impact on reactive
       transport;
    5.  to investigate the problem of modeling flow coupled with chemical reactions in the groundwater environment
       with a view towards simplification of the geochemical reaction network;
    6.  to contribute a well-characterized but chemically complex data set to the literature that would spur the
       development and/or application of hydrogeochemical transport models  of flow coupled with chemical
       reactions; and,
    7.  to examine the methods of parameter estimation used for describing reactive chemical processes during
       transport and to compare such parameters with those determined  from laboratory, small-scale field, and
       modeling investigations.
This report  discusses the experimental design and execution of the test and the quantitative description of bromide,
EDTA, and nickel-EDTA transport during the test. Experimental results forthe transport of the remain ing tracers (Cr, Pb,
Cu, and Zn) are presented  in a companion report (Davis et al., 2000).


                      Site Description and Aquifer Characteristics


The tracer test was conducted in an  abandoned gravel pit on western  Cape Cod near the Massachusetts Military
Reservation (MMR, also known as Otis Air Base, Figure 1) at the U.S. Geological Survey  Toxic Substances Hydrology
Research site. An earlier tracer test, designed primarily to study macrodispersion of solutes in the subsurface, was
conducted at the site and demonstrated the suitability of the site to tests of this type (Garabedian et al., 1991; LeBlanc
etal., 1991).

Hydrogeologic Characteristics

The site is located between the MMR sewage disposal beds and Ashumet  Pond (Figurel). The unconsolidated sand
and gravel deposits form an unconfined aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water in the area, as well as
being the primary receptor of domestic, municipal, agricultural, and industrial  wastes. Thewatertable is4-7 meters (m)
below land surface and slopes to the south at 1.6 m per 1000 m (Figure 1).  Fifty centimeters  per year (cm/yr) of water,
which is about 45% of the total annual precipitation, is estimated to recharge the ground-water system (LeBlanc et al.,
1986). Most recharge occurs in the late fall and winter when evaporation  and plant transpiration is minimal. Recharge
occurs across the tracer test site, evidenced by the wedge of pristine water  that accumulated over the tracer clouds in
this test  (see below) and the  test previously conducted at  the site  (LeBlanc et al.,  1991). On a larger scale, this
accumulation of clean recharge water at the top of the aquifer can  be seen over the sewage plume which underlies this
site.

The aquifer is composed of about 100 m of unconsolidated sediments that overlie a relatively impermeable crystalline
bedrock (Oldale, 1969). The upper 30 m of the aquifer, in which this experiment was conducted, consists of stratified
sand and gravel outwash of glaciodeltaic origin (Masterson etal., 1997). This  permeable unit has a median grain size (by
weight) of about 0.5 mm, is moderately sorted, and contains less than 1%  silt and clay sized fractions  (Barber et al.,
1992). The sediments are  composed primarily  of quartz  (95%)  with minor amounts of feldspar and  ferromagnetic
minerals  (Barber et al.,  1992; Coston  et al., 1995). Most sediment grains have coatings of  Fe and Al oxyhydroxides
(Coston etal., 1995). The amount of organic carbon in the sediments is typically less than 0.01% by weight (Barber etal.,
1992).  Beneath the sand  and gravel deposits the sediments consist  of a  fine-grained sand and silt deposit of
glaciolacustrine origin (Masterson et al., 1997).

The estimated  average horizontal hydraulic conductivity of the sand and gravel is 95 meters per day (m/d; Hess et al.,
1992). This  average was obtained from 825 hydraulic tests conducted with a flowmeter in 16 long-screened wells located
within 50 m of the tracer-test site. The average hydraulic conductivity  is  similar to the 110 m/d estimated from a
large-scale  aquifer test conducted in the outwash 2.2 kilometers (km) south  of the site (Garabedian, 1987); the aquifer
test yielded a ratio of horizontal to vertical hydraulic conductivity of 2:1 to 5:1. The hydraulic-conductivity estimates from
the flowmeter tests range over an order of magnitude. This variability results from the interbedded sand and gravel
lenses that  are evident in surface exposures of the outwash deposits (LeBlanc et al., 1991).

-------
The effective porosity is estimated to be about 0.39 from the results of several small-scale tracer tests conducted within
2.5 km of this site (Garabedian,  1987; Barlow,  1987) and the large-scale tracer test previously conducted at this site
(Garabedian et al., 1991). This estimated porosity is within the range of 0.36 to 0.42 reported by Perlmutter and Lieber
(1970) and Morris and Johnson (1967) for sandy, stratified glacial deposits.

Despite the large amount of recharge, vertical hydraulic gradients are too small to measure in clusters of monitoring wells
at the tracer-test site (LeBlancet al., 1991). Groundwaterflow is nearly horizontal. The average velocity of groundwater
in the upper  sand  and  gravel deposit  is about 0.4 m/d based  on the estimates of hydraulic gradient,  hydraulic
conductivity, and porosity given above.

Chemical Characteristics

Groundwater was contaminated by nearly 60 years  (1936-1995) of discharge of secondarily-treated sewage effluent
onto  rapid infiltration  sand beds located about 240 m  upgradient of the study site. Effluent percolating through the
unsaturated zone into the groundwater below created a plume of contaminated water that, by 1994, was greater than 5
km long (Savoie and  LeBlanc, 1998).  The contaminant plume (LeBlanc, 1984; Barber et al., 1988; Kent et al., 1994)
contains elevated concentrations of dissolved inorganic solutes including calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), potassium (K),
sodium (Na),  sulfate,  phosphate (PO4), and boron  (B).  In addition, low concentrations of dissolved oxygen (DO),
dissolved organic carbon  (1-3  mg/L),  and various detergent compounds are  observed.  Sewage-contaminated
groundwater is  slightly acidic to near-neutral  (pH 5.8-6.9).  Chemical  conditions  throughout most of the sewage-
contaminated zone are mildly reducing, with concentrations of DO  less than 35 micromoles per liter (u,M), and variable
concentrations of nitrate and manganese (Mn); concentrations of ferrous (Fe(ll)) are below detection. This region of the
sewage plume is referred to herein as the "suboxic zone." At a distance beginning about 180 m downgradient from the
disposal beds (120 m upgradient of the  injection site) the center of the sewage-contaminated region in the aquifer is
anoxic at elevations between +7 and -4 m to sea level, with concentrations of Fe(ll) up to 500 u,M (Kent et al., 1994).

Vertical, longitudinal cross sections showing DO, pH, dissolved Mn, PO4, Ca, Mg, Na, B, Si (dissolved silica), and Zn are
presented in Figure 2.  The horizontal axes of these sections show the distance downgradient of the injection multilevel
samplers (MLS) used for this tracer test. Locations of the MLS used to construct the sections are given  in Figure 3.

The plume is overlain by uncontaminated recharge water (referred to as pristine in this study), which has a lower pH (4.5-
5.5),  low concentrations of dissolved salts, and is saturated with DO (Kent et al., 1994).  Dissolved B is extremely low in
the uncontaminated  groundwater and serves as a  useful  measure of the  mixing  of ambient groundwater with the
secondary sewage effluent.

A small region of the aquifer is contaminated with Zn derived from sewage disposal.  Zn and Cu are both  present in the
effluent discharged to the disposal beds (Vaccaro et al., 1979; Rea et al.,  1991,1996; Kent and Maeder, 1999).  These
metals are common constituents of domestic sewage effluents and are thought to be derived from corrosion of pipes in
water distribution systems (Foerstner and van Lierde, 1983).  Dissolved Zn concentrations were between 4-5 u,M in the
transition zone near the injection  site (Figure 2).  These concentrations of dissolved Zn are supported by Zn adsorbed to
the aquifer sediments; concentrations of adsorbed Zn are approximately 100 times that of dissolved Zn (Davis et al.,
1998). The region of Zn contamination thinned with  distance downgradient,  and the concentration of background
dissolved Zn decreased  to below detection at  165 m downgradient of the injection site  (Figure 2).  This point is the
leading edge of the Zn being transported as a result of the sewage contamination (Kent et al., 2000a).

Definition of Geochemical Zones

In this report, for the purpose of discussing the influence of chemical conditions on the transport of tracers, we have
defined zones of differing chemical conditions  (Figure  4). Boron  concentrations can  be used to define two principal
zones in the aquifer: the pristine zone (B below detection) and the sewage-contaminated zone. Steep vertical gradients
in pH and the concentrations of DO, Zn, and  other solutes occur at altitudes between 10 and 12.5 m to sea level
(Figure 2). This region is referred to as the transition zone.  The boundary between the oxiczone and suboxic zone is
defined approximately by the 3 u,M DO contour. Except for a few MLS located along the west side of the array, the anoxic
zone at the center of the sewage contamination was located at elevations below the bottom ports of the MLS. None of
the results presented  in this report are from the anoxic zone of the aquifer. The region  of the aquifer that had sewage-
derived dissolved and adsorbed Zn is referred to as the Zn-contaminated region.

Design and Objectives of the Natural Gradient  Injection

The injection was designed to take advantage of an existing array of MLS installed in the aquifer (LeBlanc et al., 1991).
In the array, MLS are arranged in rows about 2 to 3 m apart that are aligned  perpendicular to the average  hydraulic
gradient direction. There are 809 MLS in the array (Figure 3).  Each MLS contains 15 sampling ports spaced vertically
from  0.25 m to 0.76 m apart.  Thus, chemical data can be collected at hundreds of precisely located points as tracers
move downgradient of an injection site.

-------
Six new  MLS  were installed for the injection in two closely-spaced rows of 3 MLS each (Figure  3) about 43  m
downgradient of the injection location used by LeBlanc et al. (1991).  The initial shape of the tracer cloud was intended
to occupy a space 4 m wide (transverse horizontal direction, perpendicular to flow), 3 m in vertical thickness, and 2 m in
depth (in the groundwater flow direction).  Injectate water was pumped from a holding tank into three  ports (at 13.17,
12.18, and 11.18 m elevation) of each of the six MLS, such that a significant portion of the injectate was  injected into the
pristine and sewage-contaminated zones of the aquifer.

The tracers were chosen based on their relative reactivities  under the chemical conditions  present at the field  site.
Adsorption  of the injected anionic species was known  to be pH dependent and  a function of the concentration  of
competing anions from previous tracer tests  (Kent et al., 1992, 1994, 1995,  2000b) and various laboratory studies
(Bowers and Huang, 1986; Huang etal., 1988; Borggaard, 1991; Nowackand Sigg,  1996). Pb-, Cu-, Zn-, and Ni-EDTA
complexes were chosen because of their relative stability constants (Martell and Smith, 1989) and calculated exchange
order with respect to  Fe  oxyhydroxide dissolution by EDTA.  Dissolution and metal exchange reactions with Fe- and
aluminum (Al)-oxyhydroxides coating the aquifer sediments can occur with the metal-EDTA complexes.  EDTA was
chosen as a model ligand for metal complexation, because it was known to be resistant to biodegradation in the Cape
Cod aquifer (Davis etal.,  1993).  Chromate transport was influenced by both adsorption and reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(lll),
which is an immobile species. A previous tracer test at the site  (Garabedian etal., 1991; LeBlanc etal., 1991) concluded
that Br was a suitable choice for a nonreactive tracer.

EDTA was  injected at a concentration in  slight excess of the sum of concentrations for the four metals (Table 1).
Speciation of Ni, Cu, Pb, and Zn was dominated by the complex, MeEDTA2-, in the injectate water, where Me represents
one of the four injected  metal ions. Calculations based on available thermodynamic data (Smith  and Martell, 1989)
indicated that only minor amounts of other metal-EDTA complexes (e.g., MeHEDTA-, MeOHEDTA3-) were stable under
the chemical conditions present in the  injectate water or in the  aquifer.  To simplify the discussion, we shall use the
general term of metal-EDTA complexes to refer to all of the complexes formed.  Other than the metal-EDTA complexes,
species of the four metals were  below detection in the injected water.

Description of injection procedures

On April 20, 1993, nearly 10,000 liters of pristine groundwater were withdrawn from a well 400 m downgradient of the
injection site and transported to an above-ground, plastic swimming pool installed at the site of the injection. At this well,
the pristine zone was thicker than near the  injection  MLS  making it easier to extract a sufficient volume of pristine
groundwater for the experiment. It was confirmed that only pristine water was extracted by monitoring for changes in
conductivity during pumping. All containers, including the swimming pool liner, were thoroughly cleaned  with 0.01 moles
per liter (M) EDTA and rinsed with deionized water before use.  A concentrated solution of the  EDTA  and metal salts
used  in the test (Pb, Cu, Zn, Ni) was prepared twenty-four hours before the injection, to ensure that the metal-EDTA
complexes were  equilibrated. Cr(VI)  and Br were added as salts to the holding tank on site after it was filled.  The
injectate solution was mixed with plastic paddles for 3 hours  in the swimming pool.  The water was injected into the
aquifer through the 18 sampling ports  of the 6 injection MLS at  a rate of 1.02 liters/minute/port. The injection  was
accomplished over a nine-hour period on April 21,1993.  Small amounts of the tracers apparently entered the interior of
the MLS during injection through the holes created for the sampling tubes, later exiting the MLS through  its open bottom
orthrough the same holes. This observation comes from the fact that low concentrations of tracers were detected at the
bottommost port of the injection  MLS 1 day after injection (Table 2). The mass of tracers that entered the interior of the
injection MLS was small, but was not quantified. The filled circles in the MLS in Figure 2 at zero m downgradient show
the sampling ports at which the tracers were detected  1 day after the injection.  The vertical spreading  of the initial
injection extended from about 10 to >13.7 m elevation, spanning the chemical gradients as intended.

Periodically, throughout the  injection, injectate was sampled for  pH,  EDTA, Br, and dissolved metals to check the
homogeneity of the injected water.  Differences in the tracer concentrations varied by  less than 5% among these
samples, demonstrating that the water in the holding tank was well mixed. The concentrations of the injected tracers and
other details of the tracer injection are given in Table 1. The volume of the injected water and the tracer concentrations
were chosen with the goal of observing measurable concentrations of the tracers for travel distances greater than 150 m
and reactions times of one year or longer.  Concentrations of  Br and the  metal tracers ranged from 500 to 4000 times
their respective detection limits (Table 1).

Sample types

Three different types of water samples were collected during the field experiment described in this report:  1) anion,  2)
cation, and 3) metal speciation.  Each MLS port was purged of standing water prior to sampling. Anion samples were
collected first,  followed by the cation, and metal speciation samples.  All samples were preserved immediately after
collection.  Table 3 summarizes the preservation treatments used  (indicated in procedural  order), the type of data
collected, and the analytical method used. All wastewater was collected and sampled prior to disposal off-site. Assays
of these "waste" samples were used to  correct the calculated mass balances for the tracers. Additional information on
sample collection and analyses  is given in previously published reports (Davis et al., 1993; Kent et al.,  1994,  1995).

-------
Cation samples for total dissolved metals analyses were filtered inline with 0.45 u,m (micrometers) PVDF (Millipore,
Millex-HV, 25 millimeter diameter) syringe cartridge filters (use of brand names is for identification purposes only and
does not imply endorsement by the USGS).  Sample bottles were capped at all  times except during filtration and
acidification, to avoid contamination.

Metal speciation samples were  filtered like cation samples, then passed through cartridges packed with Chelex-100
cation-exchange resin (Alltech cartridge columns or Bio-Rex ion exchange membranes) before acidification.  The ion
exchange membranes had the resin beads permanently mounted in a PTFE membrane (0.45 urn mesh). The resin bead
size in the columns was 150 - 300 microns. The column resin contained charged functional groups (iminodiacetic acid)
bound covalently to the insoluble column support.  Mobile counterions, e.g., sodium (Na+), were associated with the
functional groups.  When a sample is passed through the column, neutral and negatively charged ions pass through the
column. Cations compete with  the counterions for retention on the resin. Laboratory tests showed that the EDTA-
complexed metals (Pb, Cu, Zn, Ni, Fe, Al, Mn) considered in the field experiment passed through the exchange column.
Free metal ions were retained by the  resin as long as the flow rate through the cartridge did not exceed 20 milliliters per
minute.  In this study, the measured difference in metal concentrations between cation and metal speciation samples at
a given sampling location was defined as the free metal ion concentration.  Of the four injected metals, significant free
metal ion concentrations were only observed forZn. Table 4 summarizes the analytical errors and limits of detection for
the methods used in this study.

Sampling the tracer test

Two different sampling strategies were utilized during the tracer test: synoptic and breakthrough samplings.  Synoptic
samplings were conducted once per month during the period April to December 1993. The spatial extent of sampling
was estimated based on the size and shape of the cloud from the previous sampling and checked in the field prior to
beginning  a synoptic sampling  by measuring dissolved Br with the ion-specific electrode.  Each synoptic sampling
included MLS where the concentrations of the tracers were expected to be zero to ensure that the cloud boundaries were
defined. Two additional synoptic samplings were conducted 314 and 449 days after the injection date to measure the
amount of the reactive tracers remaining in the array and  to determine whether background conditions had been re-
established.   Generally, only cation and  anion sample types were  collected during the synoptic sampling  rounds
(Table 2).  Samples for metal speciation and pH measurements were also collected  along two transects approximately
parallel to  the direction of flow (and  the longest dimension of the  tracer cloud) during most of the synoptic sampling
rounds.

Breakthrough curves were collected from two MLS located 37 and 52 m downgradient from the injection site (Figure 3).
Samples were collected a minimum of three days per week until all tracers were no longer detectable. Samples from
both  breakthrough MLS continued to be collected after the tracer cloud had passed to monitor the return to pre-test
conditions. Metal speciation, pH, anion, and cation samples were collected for both MLS.  All MLS were sampled with
peristaltic  pumps plumbed with  silicon  tubing using the  sampling  carts described in LeBlanc et al. (1991). Norprene
tubing was used for the background measurements of DO.
                                Aqueous Chemistry Analyses
Field Site Measurements
The pH of anion water samples was measured in the field lab within 24 hours of collection and after samples had reached
room temperature; the sample bottles were tightly capped between collection and pH measurement.  pH was measured
in static mode at a fixed equilibration time (3  minutes) and data recorded to 0.1 millivolts with  a  Ross combination
electrode. All readings were recorded in millivolts and converted to pH using the mV readings of National Bureau of
Standards traceable pH buffers. The buffers were measured before and after each set of 15 samples. The uncertainty
in these measurements is probably due to variations in ionic strength and electrode drift.

Dissolved oxygen concentrations were measured using a membrane probe for concentrations  above 30  u,M as
described in Kent et al. (1994). At lower concentrations DO was determined using the CHEMet method (Chemetrics Inc.,
Calverton, VA) described in Davis et al. (1993). A CHEMet is a glass ampule that contains a premeasured amount of
Rhodazine D reagent sealed under vacuum.  Changes in color intensity of the reagent indicate the amount of DO
present.

EDTA concentrations were determined using the method of Bhattacharyya and Kunda (1971).  In this method, sulfuric
acid and an excess of Fe(lll) over EDTA were  added to each sample. Fe(lll) displaced other metals from EDTA; the
excess  Fe(lll) formed complexes with sulfate.  The  absorbance  of each  sample was measured at two different
wavelengths in the UV range (258 and 305 nanometers (nm)) to distinguish between UV (ultra-violet) absorption by

-------
Fe(lll)-sulfate and Fe(l I I)-EDTA complexes. The absorbance measured at 258 nm was subtracted from that measured at
305 nm and this value was adjusted  by the absorbance ratio (A258/A305) measured  in a blank.  The  corrected
absorbance value was  used to calculate the concentration of EDTA in the sample using a standard curve.  A linear
concentration range was observed  between 2-100 u,M EDTA. Because the Fe(lll)-EDTA complex is photosensitive,
samples and standards  were prepared and measured on the same day to minimize light exposure. A quality control (QC)
sample of diluted composite injectate solution was measured every 10-15 samples. The detection limit and relative
precision of EDTA measurements were much higher and lower, respectively, than the metals measurements, due to the
presence of unknown, UV-absorbing constituents in the sewage-contaminated groundwater. All EDTA measurements
were made within four days of collection.

Bromide Measurements

Bromide concentrations were estimated at the field site with an ion selective electrode.  The linear range of this method
in the Cape Cod groundwater was 0.1 25-6.26 mM (millimoles per liter). The field analyses were only used to estimate the
location of the tracer cloud  prior to sampling. More accurate and precise  Br data were obtained using a colorimetric
method  (Franson, 1985) with a flow injection analyzer (Lachat Instruments).  In this method, the sample is first pH-
buffered and then Br is  oxidized to BrOH (hypobromous acid) by hypochlorous acid. The BrOH reacts with fluoresceine
dye, changing the color from green to pink (tetrabromofluorescein). The linear range of the method in standard solutions
is 0.63-25.0 u,M;  however, the method limit of detection in undiluted Cape Cod groundwater was 3 u,M.  For the Br
analysis, a QC sample  of diluted composite injectate solution was measured every ten samples.

Dissolved Metals Analyses

Dissolved Al, B, Ca, Cr, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, P, Pb, Si, and Zn were analyzed by inductively-coupled plasma
atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) (Coston etal., 1998).  Method detection limits, determined by making repeated
measurements of solutions spiked at 5  and 10 times the instrument detection limit, for the  tracers are listed in Table 4.
Samples with concentrations greater than  150  mM were diluted and reanalyzed. A QC sample was run every 10-15
samples and five samples  of diluted composite injectate solution  were measured for each  analytical run.  Metals
analyses were completed within one to three months of each sampling round. The concentration of P measured by ICP-
AES was equivalent to orthophosphate measured coloro metrically in groundwater from the field site by the ascorbic acid-
molybdenum blue method (Rea et al., 1996).


                           Methods  for Calculation  of Moments


Spatial Moments

A spatial-moments approach was used to quantify the transport of the injected solutes through the aquifer,  providing
estimates of tracer mass, location, velocity, and other transport parameters, not discussed here, such as dispersivity.
The three-dimensional spatial moments of the following forms were used to calculate the total mass and center of mass:

Total Mass (zeroth moment):

                                        M = \\lnCAdydz                                         (1)

1st Moment:
Center of Mass:
                                     _      .   _
                                   A —      .  y —
                                        M        M '     M                                      (3)
where Q is the test domain; i, j, and k are 0 or 1; n is the porosity, C: is the concentration of solute i, and x, y, and z are
spatial coordinates.

The data set for each synoptic sampling contains location (x, y, and z) and concentration data. Because the data are
spatially discontinuous, numerical approximations to Equations 1 and 2 were required. The initial step in the moments
analysis was an integration in the vertical direction (z) at each MLS.  As many as 15 samples were taken at different
altitudes in the  aquifer at the same x, y location, providing good definition of the vertical distribution of tracers. Linear
changes in concentration were assumed between sampling points along each vertical profile.

-------
Following the vertical integration, a horizontal integration was performed. The horizontal spacing between MLS was
much greater than the vertical spacing between sampling points along an MLS.  To conduct the numerical integration the
horizontal plane was divided into contiguous triangular regions with the apex of each triangle defined by a sampled MLS.
Linear interpolation over these triangular regions then completed the calculations. Details of this integration approach are
given in Garabedian et al. (1991).

Temporal Moments

Areas under the breakthrough curves (the zeroth moments) were calculated using the trapezoidal rule (no smoothing
function), following the approach and equations given in Kent et al. (1994,1995). Average travel time (the first moment)
for each tracer,  , was calculated according to the equation given by Roberts et al. (1986):
                                                                                                        (4)
where mis the number of data points, Cu is the concentration of solute i of data point j, Ci0 is the injected concentration
of solute i, and t is the number of days since injection.  The mean retardation factors for individual tracers,  Rfi, are
estimated by dividing the average travel time for each tracer, , by the average time for the conservative tracer, .
Longitudinal dispersivity (the second moment) for the conservative tracer,  Br, was calculated using the definition of
Harvey and Garabedian (1991):
                                                                                                        (5)
                                                    161n2
where xt is the distance to the breakthrough MLS in meters, At is the peak width at half peak height, and tpk is the time to
the peak of the breakthrough curve. The relationship is only valid if Br does not adsorb and the ratio aL/x, is small (<0.01).


                                     Results and Discussion


Bromide Transport

Conservative, non-reactive transport of Br has been observed at this site in many small-scale tests and in one other
large-scale test conducted in 1985-88 (LeBlancet al., 1991; Garabedian et al., 1991). Thus, Brwas expected to travel
through the aquifer without interacting with the sediments. In this section we describe the observed Br transport, present
results of the moments analysis of the Br distribution, and compare these results with those from the 1985-88 test.

The Br tracer cloud was followed for 210 days after injection; later in the test, parts of the Br tracer cloud moved beyond
the instrumented region of the aquifer. The left-hand portion of Figure 5 shows the mapped distribution of maximum Br
observed after 13 and 83 days of transport. With time, the tracer cloud lengthened in the  direction of transport. The
longitudinal length of the tracer cloud, as defined by the 0.002 relative  concentration (C/Co) contour, was 1 5 and 50 m at
13 and 83 days, respectively. The spread of tracer in the directions perpendicular to flow was much less. The horizontal
width of the Br cloud was approximately 8 mat both 13 and 83 days, whereas the initial width  of the cloud was estimated
to be about 4 m.

The Br tracer cloud was well defined in the vertical direction, because of the close vertical spacing of sampling ports on
the MLS. As shown in  longitudinal cross sections (Figure 6) the height of the tracer cloud was approximately 4 and  6.5
m at 13 and 83 days, respectively. The initial vertical extent of the tracer cloud was estimated to be about 3.5 m  (Table
2). By 83 days the Br tracer cloud had developed an asymmetrical vertical distribution with  the leading edge traveling
relatively high and the trailing edge lower in the aquifer. This asymmetry was probably caused by local variability in
hydraulic conductivity. The variability in hydraulic conductivity also may account for part of the large vertical spreading of
the cloud observed between 1 3 and 83 days (Figure 6). The vertical sinking of the tracer cloud early in the test, discussed
below, may also contribute to the early vertical spreading of the Br tracer cloud.

-------
Spatial-Moments Analysis for Bromide

The zeroth moment quantifies the total mass within the tracer cloud. The porosity assumed in the analysis (Equation 1)
affects the estimated mass. A constant porosity of 0.39, used by Garabedian et al. (1991) in the analysis of the previous
large-scale test, was used here also. Figure 7 shows the estimated mass of Br for each synoptic sampling; the estimated
mass ranged from 0.89 to 1.19 times the injected Br mass, with an average of 1.03 for the eight synoptic samplings. No
temporal trend was observed, indicating that the  Br tracer traveled conservatively and did not interact with the aquifer
sediments.  The  deviations  of  estimated mass  from the  injected  mass were probably derived  from the spatially
discontinuous nature of the sampling and the numerical approximations made in the moments analysis.

All water pumped to clear the MLS tubing before sampling  and for rinsing sample bottles was captured in large waste
containers during each spatial  sampling.  The volume of the  water and its tracer concentrations were measured to
account for tracer mass removed by the  pumping and sampling  activities.  Summed over the entire  tracer test,
approximately 0.8% of the Br and Ni tracer masses were removed by the sampling activities, which is well within the
observed variation in calculated masses caused  by other problems, such as insufficient sampling on the sides of the
tracer cloud or mass estimation errors caused by the linearization of concentration gradients in the spatial analyses.

The first moment quantifies the location of the center of the tracer cloud. The porosity assumed in the calculations does
not affect the first moment results because the porosity appears in both the numerator and denominator of Equation 3.
This  is the case for all first and higher moments. Figure 8  shows the  relation of the distance traveled (location of the
center of mass relative to the injection center) to the time traveled in the aquifer for the Br cloud. A linear regression
applied to this relation yields a velocity estimate of 0.47 m/d. The scatter around the regression line is small (Figure 8a)
and the  correlation coefficient of the  relation is very high (r = 0.999), implying that the average velocity was constant
throughout the test.

The water-table altitude fluctuated about 0.8 m during the 12 months of the tracer test (April 1993 to March 1994) with the
highest and lowest altitudes occurring in  May 1993 and December 1993, respectively (Figure 9). This observed pattern
is typical of the seasonal fluctuations in the water table observed over ten years at this site. The direction of the
water-table gradient also varied seasonally about 16 degrees, with more southerly and easterly directions corresponding
to periods of low and high water levels, respectively (Figure 9a). The water-table gradient magnitude varied between 1.5
and 1.9  m per 1000 m and lagged slightly behind altitude in its seasonal pattern (Figure 9b).

Mapping the centers of mass (Figure 10) shows a slightly curved trajectory over which the tracer cloud traveled. This
curved trajectory is also reflected in the general path of transport shown in Figure 3.  Early in the test the flow path was
more easterly. Contour maps of the water-table surface also are shown in Figure 10 for 48 and 239 days after injection;
the directions of ground-water flow, estimated from the water-table contours, differ  by  14.5 degrees between the two
observations. The change in the direction of transport of the Br tracer cloud center of mass agrees with observed change
in the water-table gradient direction.

The vertical location of the Br cloud overtime is shown along a  cross section in Figure 11. Downward movement of the
tracer cloud was observed over the first 111  days. The vertical altitude of the  center of mass dropped 1.9 mfrom 12.2 m
at the center of the injection interval at 0 days, to 10.3 m at 111 days.  A primary cause of this drop in altitude was the
greater density of the tracer cloud relative to the  native groundwater. As the cloud was diluted  over time through
dispersion, this density contrast diminished and the amount of sinking decreased.

Seasonal changes in hydrologic conditions may have influenced the vertical trajectory of the tracer cloud. Although the
vertical hydraulic gradients were too small to be  detected in this section of the aquifer, a seasonal pattern in  vertical
hydraulic gradient is consistent with other observed seasonal changes in hydrologic conditions. The injection was made
during the spring (April) when recharge to the aquifer from precipitation is estimated to be occurring  (Barlow and Hess,
1993). This recharge would create a downward vertical hydraulic gradient,  which may be smaller than can be easily
detected.  In the summer, potential evapotranspiration generally exceeds  precipitation.  Thus, by 100 days after the
injection (July), recharge to the aquifer should have been  limited, and the vertical hydraulic gradient minimized.  Hence,
the seasonal changes in recharge may have caused changes in the vertical hydraulic gradient and in  the  vertical
trajectory.  Any effect of recharge-induced sinking on the tracer cloud would be  in addition to the effects of density.

Temporal-Moments Analysis for Bromide

The  results of the breakthrough well sampling for Br are presented in Table 5 for both MLS sampled.  Bromide was
detectable over 5.34 m  of vertical altitude  in BT1  and 5.58 m in BT2, which was 15 meters farther downgradient.
Representative breakthrough curves for Br, EDTA, and Ni in the different geochemical zones in the aquifer are shown in
Figure 12.  The Br peaks are symmetric and have a similar shape at all depths; this is consistent with the expected
behavior of a conservative tracer.  Bromide breakthrough did not occur simultaneously at all depths; the pattern of Br
breakthrough is consistent with the longitudinal cross section through the cloud shown in Figure 6.  Differences  in peak
appearance times are attributed to local variations in the horizontal hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer.  Variations in the

-------
horizontal hydraulic conductivity are expected on the order of the spacing of the MLS sampling ports because the
sediments were deposited in layers that are on the order of 30 centimeters thick (Hess et al., 1992).

Longitudinal dispersivities calculated from the breakthrough well data are considerably smallerthan the value calculated
from the synoptic data sets.  Longitudinal dispersivities  in the breakthrough MLS vary  from 0.01 to 0.51 meters,
compared to the 2.2 meters calculated from the synoptic data (Hess et al., 1999).  Calculated dispersivities for Br from
Equation 5 agree with values reported from small-scale tracer tests at the Cape Cod site (Harvey and Garabedian et al.,
1991; Kent et al., 1994, 1995), but they are significantly less than the 0.96 m calculated for the other large-scale test
conducted at this site (Garabedian et al., 1991). The volume of aquifer sampled by each port of the breakthrough MLS
is small and thus the dispersivities calculated from the breakthrough MLS are representative of small-scale heterogene-
ities in hydraulic conductivity.  BT1 has more variability from depth to depth than BT2. The largest dispersivity values
occurred above 9.85 meters altitude  and are consistent with the cloud elongation shown in the vertical cross sections
through the Br tracer cloud (Figure 6).

Comparison of Bromide Results to an Earlier Tracer Test (1985-1988)

A tracer test of similar magnitude was conducted at this site in 1985-1988 (LeBlancetal., 1991; Garabedian etal., 1991).
The primary purpose of that test was  to investigate the dispersion of a  nonreactive solute as it traveled through a
heterogeneous  aquifer. The injection location  for the earlier test was 43 m  upgradient from that of the current test.
Consequently, the sections of aquifer traversed in the two tests are different but they overlap. A comparison between the
results of the 1985-1988 and the current test provides insight into the stationarity of transport properties in this aquifer.

The synoptic sampling and spatial-moments analysis approach provided good characterizations of the distribution of Br
tracer in both tests. The average normalized mass for the 1985-88 test was 0.97, as compared to 1.00 for the current
test. Although the plots of distance traveled against time are very similar for the two tests (Figure 8b), the mean velocities
determined from the location of the center of mass with time are slightly different. Garabedian et al. (1991) reports a
velocity of 0.42 m/d with a correlation coefficient of 0.997 for the earlier test. The velocity reported above for the current
test is 0.47 m/d with a correlation coefficient of 0.999. Assuming that the hydraulic conductivity was the same for the two
tests, the 12% increase in velocity can be explained by the slight difference in hydraulic gradient during the two tests
(Figure 13). On  average, the gradient magnitude was about 0.18 m per thousand meters higher during the current test
than in the 1985-1988 test, which is a 12% increase in magnitude.

The two experiments, although conducted in different sections of the aquifer, provide similar  estimates of the mean
properties of the aquifer. The use of a  constant porosity (0.39) in the spatial-moments analysis estimated near 100%
mass recovery, which supports conservative, non-reactive transport of Br in both experiments. This estimate of porosity
is within the range expected for this type of coarse sand and gravel deposit. The velocities estimated from the two tests
are also  similar, suggesting that the mean horizontal hydraulic conductivity is the same throughout the  aquifer. In
subsequent reports, comparisons of the results of the second-moments analysis will provide information on the spatial
stationarity of solute dispersion in this aquifer.

Similar density-dependent transport  behavior was  observed in the two tests (Figure 14). Both tracer clouds sank
extensively during the first 100 days of transport. The tracer cloud in the earlier experiment continued to sink until about
237 days after  injection.  Seasonal  differences  in  recharge  may account for this difference  in vertical sinking; the
1985-1988 test began in July and the 1993-1994 test began in April.

Tracer-induced Perturbations in Groundwater pH Values

Chemical reactivity  is a function of pH, therefore it is important to understand how the existing pH conditions may have
been altered during the tracertest. The injection of the tracer solution temporarily changed the pre-existing pH gradient
because  the injectate solution had a uniform pH of 5.6  (Table 2, Figure 2). In  addition, several  different chemical
reactions between solutes in the tracer cloud and the aquifer sediments could also cause local changes  in pH values.

Exchange reactions, chromate reduction and metal ion adsorption would all result in a net consumption of hydrogen ions
(H+), and therefore  an increased  pH.  Exchange of the metal ion in the injected  metal-EDTA complexes with  Fe(lll)
dissolved from oxyhydroxide phases would be accompanied by adsorption of the metal ion and consumption of H+ ions:

                   MeEDTA2-+ Fe(OH)3s + >SOH + 2H+ =  FeEDTA-  + >SOMe+  + 3H2O                    (6)

where Me represents a divalent metal  initially  complexed with EDTA in the tracer solution and >SOH represents an
adsorption site on the aquifer sediments.  Metal exchange reactions of the EDTA complexes with Al would have the
same stoichiometry. Reduction of Cr(VI) by Fe(ll) could be accompanied by consumption or production of H+, depending
on the chemical speciation of Fe(ll).  For example, reduction of Cr(VI) by magnetite results in the consumption of H+:

                        3Fe3O4s + CrO42-+14H2O + 2H+  =  9Fe(OH)3s + Cr(OH)3s                         (7)

-------
Reduction of Cr(VI) by otherFe(ll) minerals, such asglauconite, would also consume H+. The results of Anderson etal.
(1994) suggest that the reaction in Equation 7 was more likely to be the dominant pathway for Cr(VI) reduction in the
aquifer.

Observations suggest that the net result of chemical reactions between reactive tracers and aquifer sediments led to a
net decrease or negligible change in pH values. It is likely that the decrease in pH resulted from ion exchange reactions
of major ions in the tracer cloud with the aquifer sediments, which caused a net release of H+.  The sodium ion (Na+)
concentration of the  injectate solution was greater than 4.4  mM  (Table 1).  The Na+ concentration of the ambient
groundwater ranged from less than 200 mM in the pristine zone to about 2 mM in the suboxic zone. The potassium ion
(K+) concentration  in the injectate solution was also about 4.4 mM (Table 1). In contrast, the K+ concentration in ambient
groundwater ranged from about 11 uJVl in the pristine zone to about 300 u,M in the suboxic zone (Kent et al., 1994).
These monovalent cations undergo weak interactions with surface sites  on oxide minerals  (Davis and Kent,  1990)
accompanied by the release of H+:

                                      >SOH + K+ = >SO-K+ + H+                                       (8)

In addition to H+, weakly adsorbed divalent cations, such as Ca2+ and Mg2+, on oxide or aluminosilicate surfaces could
exchange with dissolved Na+ and K+  in the  tracer cloud.  Such  reactions have  already been shown to cause the
retardation of lithium ions in the aquifer (Wood et al., 1990).

The magnitude of the ion exchange reactions should decrease from the pristine zone to the suboxic zone as a result of
the increase in cation concentrations with depth.  In the pristine zone close to the injection, the experimental data show
that reactions between the tracer cloud and the sediments caused a decrease in pH (Figure 15; Table 2). Breakthrough
of the tracers at concentrations close to their values in the injectate solution was accompanied by a decrease in pH from
approximately 5.8  to 5.2. Coincident with the decrease in pH, there was an increase in the concentrations of Na+, K+,
Ca2+,  and Mg2+ (Figure  15).  Concentrations of Na+ increased to values close to those  in the  injectate,  but  K+
concentrations were much less than those in the injectate (Figure 15).  Thus,  it is likely that reactions similar to those
represented by Equation 8 caused the observed decrease in pH and that K+ was a more important reactant than Na+.

Perturbations in pH values in the pristine zone were still  measurable 37 m downgradient at BT1 (Figure 16).  The
decrease in pH was observed along the rising limb of the breakthrough curve, indicating that it was a feature associated
with the leading edge of the tracer cloud.  Other small fluctuations in pH were observed after the rising limb of the Br
breakthrough curve; but most of these were within the error of the measurement (±0.15 pH units). During breakthrough
of the reactive tracers in the pristine zone  (at  about 90 days, c.f. Figure 12A), the pH values were close to those in the
ambient groundwater.

No significant change in pH was observed at lower altitudes in the aquifer (Figure  17).  In addition to  the greater
importance of K+ exchange with Ca2+ and Mg2+ in the suboxic zone, alkalinities in the suboxic zone of the sewage plume
are up to 20 times larger than those in the pristine zone (LeBlancetal., 1991). Thus, as a result of both the greater buffer
capacity of the groundwater and the higher concentrations of exchangeable divalent cations, the tracer cloud did not
cause significant pH perturbations in the suboxic zone.

EDTA Speciation

Only the six metals, Cu,  Ni,  Pb, Zn, Fe, and Al, were complexed with EDTA.  Neither Mn-EDTA nor any other metal-
EDTA complexes formed to an appreciable extent afterthe injection, as indicated by analysis of the speciation samples.
Thus, there was an excellent correlation between the measured EDTA concentration (from samples collected  at the
breakthrough MLS and for the selected synoptic transect samples for which speciation was determined) and the sum of
the total concentrations of dissolved Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn, Fe, and Al as measured by ICPAES (Figure 18).  The summation
method should slightly overestimate the EDTA mass because a portion of the dissolved Zn is not complexed (Davis et
al., 2000), however,  the sum  of the six dissolved metals was generally about 3%  less than the  measured EDTA
concentration (Figure 18).  Therefore, in the  absence of measured EDTA concentrations for each point in the synoptic
samplings, the sum of the six metals is a reasonable method for estimating dissolved EDTA mass during the experiment.

EDTA was transported not as uncomplexed EDTA4-,  but as a collection of anionic metal-EDTA complexes.  Although
subsequent discussion refers to the "Ni cloud", Ni is actually present as dissolved Ni-EDTA (Table 2). The overall result
of the metal exchange reactions that occurred  as  the tracer cloud moved downgradient was a shift in the EDTA
speciation among  the four injected metals (Ni, Pb, Cu, Zn) and the two metals derived from oxide dissolution, Al and
Fe(lll) as described by Equations, above.  By the end of the experiment, EDTA speciation was dominated by the Fe-and
Ni-EDTA complexes (Figure 19).

The synoptic sampling at 175 days showed a much higher estimate of EDTA mass than any of the other samplings. The
sampling at 175 days was the only one conducted during a  heavy rainstorm, and the wet conditions appeared to cause
problems with contamination of sample containers and filtered samples with sand grains and other inorganic detritus that
adhered to plastic gloves and the sampling equipment. After acidification  of the samples, metals associated with this
                                                    10

-------
particulate matter could be dissolved under the acidic conditions in the samples. This appeared to cause a particular
problem with the concentrations of dissolved Fe observed during this sampling, and can be seen in the large dissolved
Fe mass found at 175 days (Figure 19). The masses of other tracers at the 175 day sampling fell closer to the general
trends observed as a function of time. This is consistent with the results of a comparison of metal ion concentrations in
filtered and unfiltered samples conducted elsewhere in the  aquifer, which showed that the only metal ion for which
significantly higher concentrations were observed in unfiltered samples was Fe (Kent, 1998).

Unlike the mass of dissolved Al, which decreased rapidly with time during the test, the mass of dissolved Fe in the EDTA
tracer cloud  increased steadily (Figure 19), consistent with the known thermodynamic stability of the Fe(lll)-EDTA
complexes. At chemical equilibrium, the degree of exchange of the four injected metals with Fe(lll) is different for each
metal and is dependent primarily on pH and the concentration of the metal-EDTA complexes. Nickel was expected to be
the least reactive of the four injected metal-EDTA complexes because it had the largest stability constant (Martell and
Smith,  1989). The exchange reaction is more favorable as  the concentration of metal-EDTA complexes decreases.
Thus, dilution of the tracer cloud by dispersion enhances the  exchange reaction with Fe(lll) and would cause a general
increase in dissolved Fe mass as the tracer test progressed  (Figure 19).

Comparison Between Ni, EDTA, and Br Transport

As was the case for Br, the Ni tracer cloud lengthened in the direction of transport as these solutes were transported
through the aquifer, although it lengthened less than the Br cloud (longitudinal lengths of the Ni cloud were 14 and 45 m
at 13 and 83 days, respectively) (Figure 5).  The horizontal width of both tracer clouds, based on the 0.002 relative
concentration contour at 13 and 83 days, was about 8 m, as compared to the initial width of 4 m. Because of the method
used for estimating EDTA in the spatial samplings (discussed above), contour plots were not made for this constituent.

The Ni cloud  also moved downward over the first 111  days of the test. Initially the injection straddled the Zn-contaminated
region, and as the test progressed, the tracers sank such that the center of mass traveled toward the lower boundary of
the Zn-contaminated region (Figure 20). The Zn-contaminated region thins about 75 m downgradient of the injection site
(Figure 2). By the last spatial sampling (314 days) the center of Ni mass had sunk out of the Zn-contaminated region. As
described previously, this downward movement was likely caused by a density contrast between the tracer solution and
ambient groundwater and  immeasurable, downward gradients resulting from recharge derived from precipitation.

Spatial-moment and temporal-moment analyses were performed on the concentration data to quantify the transport of
the EDTA and Ni tracerthrough the aquifer. Figure 21 a displays the EDTA, Ni and Br masses through time, as calculated
by the zeroth moment analysis of the sampled distributions and each normalized by dividing by their respective injection
mass. The normalized Br masses cluster around the line that defines conservative transport (1.0). The normalized  Ni
masses all fall below 1.0, implying that some Ni was removed from the groundwater by adsorption to the aquifer
sediments. The estimated normalized mass of Ni ranges from 0.76 to 0.97,  with an average mass  of 0.88 (for nine
synoptic samplings). EDTA estimated mass was generally less than 1.0 early in the tracer test due to adsorption  of
metal-EDTA  complexes.  The calculation from summation of the metal masses likely overestimated EDTA mass as the
tracer cloud area increased, because total Zn mass includes both Zn-EDTA and uncomplexed Zn masses (discussed
above and in  Davis et al.,  2000). Moments calculated from breakthrough curves for EDTA and  Ni indicated  reversible
adsorption: both tracers were retarded but areas under their breakthrough curves were similar to those for Br (Figures 12
and 24).

In a second  normalization step, each normalized Ni or EDTA mass was divided  by the corresponding normalized  Br
mass to obtain a relative  mass (Figure 21 b). This second normalization was done to remove error  in the calculated
masses that  might result from the spatial sampling scheme. The relative masses for Ni clustered around an average of
0.87 and for EDTA averaged 0.99 (for eight synoptic samplings).

When the observed concentration data are displayed along a longitudinal cross section  (Figure 6), significant differences
between the Ni and Br distributions are apparent. The two clouds were both about 4 and 6.5 m in vertical thickness at 13
and  83 days, respectively,  compared to the  initial thickness of about 3 m;  but the shapes  of the clouds differed
substantially.  The leading edge of the Ni cloud at 83 days trails behind the leading edge of the Br cloud and is located
lower in the aquifer in the transition zone (Figure 6).  In the upper portion of the aquifer, the trailing edge of the Ni tracer
cloud is far behind the trailing edge for Br. Regression analysis of the center-of-mass  locations of the tracers with time
(Figure 22) estimated the velocity of the Ni tracer at 0.39 m/d (n=10, r=0.998). Thus the average retardation  factor (Rf)
was  1.2 for Ni transport relative to Br.

An areal map of the centers of mass of the Ni and Br clouds with time (Figure 23) shows how Ni lagged behind Br. This
lag and the changes in the direction of the hydraulic gradient over the period monitored (Figure 9a) resulted  in the two
tracer clouds, Ni and Br, diverging onto slightly different trajectories. The centers of mass forthe Brand Ni clouds at 175
and 210 days, respectively, are located near each other (Figure 23); however, the Ni center of mass for 210 days is
located slightly to the west of the Br center for 175 days.  The direction of ground-water flow, based on the  estimated
                                                    11

-------
hydraulic gradient, changed 4.8 degrees over the 35 days between the two samplings, and resulted in the observed
difference in trajectories.

Adsorptive losses of Ni and EDTA masses were evident early in the test. Between the time of the injection and the first
spatial sampling 13 days later, about 15% of both the EDTA mass (expressed as the sum of the six metals) and Ni mass
were adsorbed onto  the aquifer sediments (Figure 21 b).  Based on the speciation sampling completed throughout the
test, dissolved Ni mass was transported as the anionic complex NiEDTA2-. After this initial loss, both the EDTA and Ni
masses were fairly constant (Figures 19,21 b, and 24a). By the time the tracer cloud reached the breakthrough wells (45
days after injection) the normalized areas under the breakthrough curves for Br, EDTA, and Ni were approximately equal
(Figure 24a) indicating that adsorption of the EDTA and Ni-EDTA complexes was reversible. Thus, EDTA and Ni-EDTA
transport through the aquifer were retarded by adsorption, but the masses being transported were nearly constant after
the initial equilibration of the tracers with the aquifer solids.

Complicating an analysis of the effects of small-scale heterogeneity was the large-scale variable adsorption of Ni onto
the aquifer sediments in the different geochemical zones of the aquifer (Figures 6,12, and 24b). The difference in cloud
shape between Ni and Br (Figure 6) was consistent with the delayed peak appearance and  long trailing  edges of the
breakthrough curves for EDTA and Ni-EDTA in  Figure 12a. Both EDTA and the divalent Ni-EDTA complexes were more
retarded  in the pristine zone (Figure 24b).  Adsorption of the metal-EDTA complexes was greater in the  pristine zone
near the  water table, because the pH is lower (around 5.5) than in the suboxic zone of the aquifer. In  addition, the
concentrations of other anions, such as sulfate and phosphate, which compete with the divalent metal-EDTA complexes
(i.e., Ni-EDTA) for available adsorption  sites, are low in the pristine zone. However, Ni-EDTA was consistently more
retarded than EDTA. Retardation factors up to 2.07 were measured for Ni-EDTA in the pristine zone as  compared to
1.34 for the total EDTA peak.  Monovalent Fe(lll)-EDTA complexes  were retarded less than the divalent Ni-EDTA
complexes (Davis et al., 2000), decreasing the retardation  represented by the total EDTA peak in the pristine zone.
Under the geochemical  conditions of the sewage-contaminated zone, total EDTA and divalent Ni-EDTA were retarded
similarly,  indicating  similar extents  of  adsorption  for the divalent  Cu-,  Ni-, and Zn-EDTA complexes (Pb did not
breakthrough) and monovalent (Fe-, AI-EDTA) complexes present (Figure 24b).


                                              Summary


Comparisons  between the distributions of conservative and weakly reactive tracers showed how small- and large-scale
geochemical and hydrogeological heterogeneity may affect solute transport. The following general conclusions were
reached.

    1.  Bromide ion  was transported conservatively during the experiment. The results for the current test  compare
       favorably with the Br transport  parameters calculated from a  previous large-scale tracer test at the site.
       Based on spatial moments analysis of eight synoptic data sets the average normalized mass for Br was 1.03
       and the mean velocity was 0.47 m/d.
    2.  Injection of the tracer cloud induced only minor changes in the chemical conditions in the aquifer. The most
       significant change was a small decrease in pH in the pristine zone, most likely resulting from ion exchange
       reactions. The impact of this change on transport of reactive tracers was only significant early in the tracer
       test.
    3.  EDTA can be represented as the sum of 6 dissolved metals: Al, Fe, Cu, Ni, Pb, and  Zn.  Complexes with
       these metal  ions comprised 100% of the EDTA throughout the tracer test.
    4.  The metal-EDTA complexes, including Ni-EDTA, were reversibly adsorbed onto the aquifer solids during
       transport.
    5.  Transport of the metal-EDTA complexes was highly retarded in the pristine zone and only slightly retarded
       in the transition and suboxic zones.
    6.  Due to the sinking of the tracer cloud, the percentage of each tracer that traveled in each geochemical zone
       varied overtime. Early in the test more of the tracer was located high in the aquifer in the pristine zone, but
       with time, the sinking caused less tracer to be in the pristine zone and more to be in the suboxic zone.
    7.  Attempts to quantify the effects of small-scale heterogeneity on transport are complicated because the Br
       and Ni-EDTA tracer clouds  encountered different sections of the aquifer as they traveled downgradient
       along slightly different trajectories.
                                                    12

-------
                                             References


Anderson, L.D., Kent, D.B., and Davis,  J.A. (1994)  Batch  experiments characterizing the reduction of Cr(VI) using
    suboxic material from a mildly reducing sand and gravel aquifer, Environ. Sci. Technol., 28(1), 178-185.
Barber, L.B., II, Thurman, E.M., Schroeder, M.P., and LeBlanc, D.R. (1988) Long-term fate of organic micropollutants in
    sewage-contaminated groundwater, Environ. Sci. Technol., 22(2), 205-211.
Barber, L.B., II, Thurman, E.M., and Runnells, D.D. (1992)  Geochemical heterogeneity in a sand and gravel aquifer:
    Effect of sediment mineralogy and particle size on the sorption of chlorobenzenes, J. Contam. Hvdrol., 9(1), 35-54.
Barlow, P.M. (1987) The use of temperature as a ground-water tracer in glacial outwash: Tucson, Ariz., University of
    Arizona, Dept. of Hydrology and Water Resources, unpublished M.S. thesis, 141 pp.
Barlow, P.M., and Hess, K.M. (1993) Simulated hydrologic responses of the Quashnet River stream-aquifer system to
    proposed ground-water withdrawals,  Cape  Cod, Massachusetts, U.S.  Geological  Survey Water-Resources
    Investigations Report 93-4064, 52 pp.
Bhattacharyya, S.N. and Kunda, K.P. (1971) Spectrophotometric determination of EDTA, Taranta, 18, 446-449.
Borggaard, O.K. (1991) Effects of phosphate on iron oxide dissolution in EDTA and oxalate, Clays and Clay Min., 39(3),
    321-325.
Bowers, A.R. and Huang, C.P. (1986) Adsorption characteristics of metal-EDTA complexes onto hydrous oxides, J_,
    Colloid Interface Sci., 110(2), 575-590.
Cederberg, G.A., Street,  R.L., Leckie, J.O. (1985) A groundwater mass transport and equilibrium chemistry model for
    multicomponent systems, Water Resour. Res., 21 (8),  1095-1104.
Coston, J.A., Fuller, C.C., and Davis, J.A. (1995) Pb2+ and Zn2+ adsorption by a natural aluminum- and iron-bearing
    surface coating on an aquifer sand, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 59(17), 3535-3547.
Coston, J.A., Abrams, R. H., and Kent, D. B. (1998) Selected inorganic solutes, /nSavioe, J. and LeBlanc, D. R., Eds.,
    Water-quality data and methods of analysis for samples collected near a plume of sewage-contaminated ground
    water, Ashumet Valley, Cape Cod, Massachusetts, 1993-94, U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations
    Report 97-4269, 19-21.
Curtis, G.P. and  Rubin, J.,  submitted, Solute transport influenced by  multiple,  equilibrium controlled reactions:
    Extensions and numerical implementation of the  feed forward method  to complex reaction networks, submitted to
    Water Resour. Res.
Davis, J.  A., Coston, J. A., Kent,  D. B.,  and Fuller, C.  C. (1998) Application of the surface complexation concept to
    complex mineral assemblages, Environ. Sci. Technol., 32, 2820-2828.
Davis, J.A., Coston, J.A., Kent, D.B., Hess, K.M., Joye, J.L., Brienen, P., and Bussey, K.W. (2000) Multispecies reactive
    tracer test in a sand and gravel aquifer,  Cape Cod, Massachusetts.  Part II. Transport of chromium(VI) and lead-,
    copper-, and zinc-EDTA tracers, EPA/600/R-01/007b, 47 pp., U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Davis, J.A., Kent, D.B., Rea, B.A., Maest,  A.S.,  and Garabedian, S.P. (1993) Influence of redox environment  and
    aqueous speciation on metal transport in groundwater: Preliminary results of tracer injection studies, in Allen, H.E.,
    Perdue, E.M, and Brown, D.S., Eds., Metals in Groundwater, Chelsea, Ml, Lewis Publishers, 223-273.
Davis, J.A. and Kent, D.B. (1990) Surface complexation modeling in aqueous geochemistry, Rev. Mineral., 23,177-260.
Foerstner, U., and van Lierde, J.H. (1983) Trace metals in water purification processes, in Foerstner, U. and Wittman,
    T.W., Eds., Metal Pollution in the Aquatic Environment, New York, Springer-Verlag, 324-359.
Franson,  M.A.H (1985) Standard methods forthe examination of water and wastewater, 16th ed. American Public Health
    Association, Washington, D.C., 201-204.
Garabedian, S.P. (1987)  Large-scale dispersive transport in aquifers: Field experiments and reactive transport theory:
    Cambridge, Mass., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Civil Engineering, PhD thesis, 290 pp.
Garabedian, S. P., LeBlanc, D. R., Gelhar, L. W., and Celia, M. A. (1991) Large-scale natural gradient tracertest in sand
    and gravel, Cape Cod, Massachusetts, 2. Analysis of spatial moments for a nonreactive tracer, Water Resour. Res.,
    27(5), 911-924.
Harvey, R.W. and Garabedian, S.P. (1991) Use of colloid filtration theory in modeling movement of bacteria through a
    contaminated sandy aquifer, Environ. Sci. Technol., 25(1), 178-185.
Hess, K. M., Davis, J. A.,  Coston, J. A., and Kent, D. B., 1999, Multspecies reactive transport in an aquiferwith spatially
    variable chemical conditions:  Dispersion of bromide and nickel tracers, in Morganwalp, D.W., and Buxton, H.T.,
    Eds., U.S. Geological  Survey Toxic Substances Hydrology Program—Proceedings of the Technical Meeting,
                                                    13

-------
    Charleston, South Carolina, March 8-12,1999 — Volume 3 — Subsurface Contamination from Point Sources: U.S.
    Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4018C, pp. 393-404.
Hess, K.M., Wolf, S.H., and Celia, M.A.  (1992) Large-scale natural gradient tracer test in sand and gravel, Cape Cod,
    Massachusetts: 3. Hydraulic-conductivity variability and calculated macrodispersivities, Water Resour. Res., 28(8),
    2011-2027.
Hostetler, C. J., Erikson, R.L., Fruchter, J.S., and Kincaid, C.T. (1989) FASTCHEM package, Overview and application
    to a chemical transport problem, Final Report for EPRI EA-5870, Project 2485-2, Pacific Northwest Lab, Richland,
    WA.
Huang, C.P., Rhoads, E.A., Hao, O.J. (1988) Adsorption ofZn(ll) onto hydrous aluminosilicates in the presence of EDTA,
    Water Res.. 22(8), 1001-1009.
Kent, D. B.,  1998, Effects of pumping rate and filtration on measured concentrations of inorganic solutes, in J. Savioe and
    D. R. LeBlanc, Eds., Water-quality data and methods of analysis for samples collected near a plume of sewage-
    contaminated ground water, Ashumet Valley, Cape Cod, Massachusetts,  1993-94, U.S. Geological Survey Water-
    Resources Investigations Report 97-4269, 11-15.
Kent, D. B.,  Abrams, R. H., Davis, J. A., Coston, J. A., and LeBlanc, D. R. (2000a) Modeling the  influence of variable pH
    on the transport of zinc in a contaminated aquifer using semi-empirical surface complexation models, Water Resour.
    Res.. 36. 3411-3425.
Kent, D.B., Davis, J.A., Anderson, L.C.D., and Rea, B.A. (1995) Transport of chromium and selenium in a pristine sand
    and gravel aquifer:  Role of adsorption processes, Water Resour.  Res., 31(4), 1041-1050.
Kent, D.B., Davis, J.A., Anderson, L.C.D., Rea, B.A., and Waite, T.D. (1994) Transport of chromium and selenium in the
    suboxic zone of a shallow aquifer: Influence of redox and adsorption reactions, Water Resour. Res., 30(4), 1099-
    1114.
Kent, D.B., Davis, J.A., Rea, B.A., and Anderson, L.C.D. (1992) Ligand-enhanced transport of strongly adsorbing metal
    ions in  the ground-water environment,  in Kharaka, Y.  and  Maest, A.S., Eds., Water-Rock Interactions  WRI-7,
    Rotterdam, A.A. Balkema, 1,  805-808.
Kent, D.B., Davis, J.A., Anderson, L.C.D., Rea, B.A., and Coston, J.A., (2000b) Effect of adsorbed metal contaminants
    on the transport of Zn- and Ni-EDTA complexes in a sand and gravel aquifer, Environ. Sci. Technol., submitted.
Kent D. B. and Maeder, V., 1999, Evolution of a ground-water sewage plume after removal of the 60-year-long source,
    Cape Cod, Massachusetts: pH and fate of phosphate and metals, /nMorganwalp, D.W., and  Buxton, H.T.,  Eds., U.S.
    Geological Survey Toxic Substances Hydrology Program—Proceedings of the Technical  Meeting, Charleston,
    South Carolina, March 8-12, 1999 — Volume 3 — Subsurface Contamination from Point Sources:  U.S. Geological
    Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4018C, pp. 245-259.
Kohler, M.,  Curtis, G.P., Kent, D.B., and Davis, J.A. (1996) Experimental  investigation and modeling of uranium(VI)
    transport under variable chemical conditions, Water Resour. Res., 32(12), 3539-3551.
LeBlanc,  D.R., Garabedian, S.P., Hess, K.M., Gelhar, L.W., Quadri, R.D., Stollenwerk, K.G., and Wood, W.W. (1991)
    Large-scale natural gradient tracer test in sand and gravel, Cape Cod, Massachusetts: 1. Experimental design and
    observed tracer movement, Water Resour. Res., 27(5), 895-910.
LeBlanc,  D.R., Guswa, J.H., Frimpter, M.H.,  and Londquist, C.J. (1986) Ground-water  resources of Cape Cod,
    Massachuetts, U.S. Geological  Survey Hydrologic Investigations Atlas,  HA-692, 4 sheets.
LeBlanc,  D.R. (1984) Sewage plume in a sand and gravel aquifer, Cape Cod, Massachusetts,  U.S. Geological Survey
    Water-Supply Paper, 2218, 28 pp.
Liu, C.W. and Narasimhan,  T.N.  (1989) Redox-controlled multiple-species  reactive chemical transport,  1,  Model
    development, Water Resour. Res., 25, 869-882.
Manning, B.A. and Goldberg,  S. (1996) Modeling competitive adsorption of arsenate with phosphate and moybdate on
    oxide minerals, Soil Sci. Soc. Amer., 60, 121-131.
Martell, A.E. and Smith, R.M.  (1989) Critical Stability Constants, Vol. 6, Second Supplement, New York, Plenum, 604 pp.
Masterson,  J.P., Stone, B.D., Walter, D.A., and Savoie, J. (1997) Hydrogeologic framework of western Cape Cod,
    Massachusetts,  U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Investigations Atlas, HA 740, 1 plate.
Morris, D.A., and Johnson, A.J. (1967)  Summary of hydrologic and physical properties of rock and soil materials as
    analyzed  by  the Hydrologic Laboratory of the U.S.  Geological Survey, 1948-1960, U.S. Geological  Survey
    Professional Paper,  1839-D, 42 pp.
Nowack, B.  and Sigg, L. (1996) Adsorption of EDTA and metal-EDTA complexes on goethite, J. Colloid Interface Sci.,
    177, 106-121.
                                                    14

-------
Oldale, R.N. (1969) Seismic investigations on Cape Cod, Martha's Vineyard, and Nantucket, Massachusetts, and a
    topographic map of the basement surface from Cape Cod Bay to the Islands, U.S. Geological Survey Professional
    Paper, 650-B, B122-B127.
Parkhurst, D. L.  (1995) User's guide to PHREEQC: A computer program for speciation, reaction-path, advective-
    transport, and inverse geochemical calculations, U.S. Geological Survey Water- Resources Investigation Report,
    95-4227, 143pp.
Perlmutter,  N.M.  and  Lieber,  M. (1970) Dispersal of plating wastes and sewage contamination in ground water and
    surface water, South Farmingdale-Massapequa area, Nassau  County, New York, U.S. Geological Survey Water
    Supply  Paper, 1879-G, 67 pp.
Rea, B.A., Kent, D.B., Anderson, L.C.D., Davis, J.A., and LeBlanc, D.R. (1996) The transport of inorganic contaminants
    in a sewage plume in the Cape Cod aquifer, Massachusetts, in Morganwalp,  D.W. and Aronson, D.A., Eds., U.S.
    Geological Survey Toxic Substances Hydrology Program—Proceedings of the technical meeting, Colorado Springs,
    Colorado, September 20-24,1993: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report, 94-4015, 191-
    198.
Rea, B.A., Kent, D.B., LeBlanc, D.R., and Davis, J.A. (1991) Mobility of zinc in a sewage-contaminated aquifer, Cape
    Cod, Massachusetts, in Mallard, G.E. and Aronson, D.A., Eds., U.S.Geological Survey Toxic Substances Hydrology
    Program—Proceedings of the technical meeting, Monterey, California, March 11-15, 1991, U.S. Geological Survey
    Water-Resources Investigations Report, 91-4034, 88-95.
Roberts, P.V., Goltz, M.N., and Mackay,  D.M. (1986) A natural gradient experiment on solute transport in a sand aquifer,
    3. Retardation estimates on mass balances for organic solutes, Water Resour. Res., 22(13), 2047-2058.
Rubin, J. (1990) Solute transport with multisegment, equilibrium-controlled reactions: A feed forward simulation method,
    Water Resour. Res.. 26(9), 2029-2055.
Savoie, J., and LeBlanc, D.R., Eds., (1998) Water-quality data and methods of analysis for samples collected near a
    plume of sewage-contaminated ground water, Ashumet Valley, Cape Cod, Massachusetts, 1993-94, U.S. Geological
    Survey  Water-Resources Investigations Report 97-4269, 208 pp.
Smith, R.M. and Martell, A.E.  (1989) Critical Stability Constants, 6, Second Supplement, New York, Plenum, 643 pp.
Stollenwerk, K.G. (1995) Modeling the effects of variable groundwater chemistry on adsorption of molybdate, Water
    Resour. Res.. 31(2), 347-357.
Stollenwerk, K.G. (1998) Molybdate transport in a chemically complex  aquifer:  Field measurements compared with
    solute-transport model predictions, Water Resour. Res., 34(10), 2727-2740.
Vaccaro, R.F., Kallio,  P.E., Ketchum, B.H., Kerfoot, W.B., Mann, A., Deese, P.L., Palmer,  C., Dennett,  M.R., Bowker,
    P.C., Corwin, N., and Manganini, S.J., (1979) Wastewater renovation and retrieval on Cape Cod, U.S.  Environmental
    Protection Agency, EPA-600/2-79-176, 174 pp.
Waite, T.D., Davis, J.A., Payne, T.E., Waychunas,  G.A., and Xu, N. (1994) Uranium(VI) adsorption  to ferrihydrite:
    Application of a surface complexation model, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 58, 5465-5478.
Wood, W.W.,  Kraemer, T.F., and Hearn, P.P. Jr. (1990) Intragranular diffusion:  An important mechanism influencing
    solute transport in clastic aquifers, Science, 147, 1569-1572.
Yeh, G.T. and Tripathi, V.S. (1989) A critical evaluation of recent developments of hydrogeochemical transport models
    of reactive multichemical components, Water Resour. Res., 25(1), 93-108.
Yeh, G.T. and Tripathi, V.S. (1991) A model for simulating transport of reactive multispecies components: Model
    development and demonstration, Water Resour. Res., 27(12), 3075-3094.
                                                   15

-------
Tables
   16

-------
Table 1.
           Description of the Injectate and Injection Statistics
              Constituent
Reagent
Concentration
Concentration/MDL *
PH
Br
EDTA4
Cr042
Cu
Ni
Pb
Zn
	
KBr
Na4EDTA
K2Cr2O7
CuCl2-6H2O
NiCl2-6H2O
Pb(NO3)2-6H2O
ZnCl2-6H2O
5.6
3.43 mM
1.112mM
0.506 mM (as Cr)
0.266 mM
0.256 mM
0.248 mM
0.266 mM
	
1143
139
2663
4222
502
517
1773
          Volume
         Altitude of Injection ports
         Rate of Injection
         Duration of Test
           9884 L
           13.17, 12.18, 11.18m
           1.02 L/min/port
           449 days (Day 0 = April 21, 1993)
         MDL = Method Detection Limit
                                                     17

-------
 Table 2.
              Data from an Injection MLS and Three MLS 1.4 to 2 m from the Injection Center One Day after Injection
                        Part A: Tracers
MLS name and
sample port altitude, m
Br, mM   pH
All concentrations are in micromolar
Cr     Cu-total  Cu-EDTA Ni-total  Ni-EDTA  Pb-total  Pb-EDTA Zn-total  Zn-EDTA
23B15- injection MLS
13.82
13.51
13.22
12.97
12.72
12.46
12.21
11.91
11.5
11.2
10.59
10.2
9.8
9.3
8.7
0.209
3.309
3.346
3.383
2.409
3.325
3.317
3.255
2.857
3.352
3.300
0.011
0.192
0.057
0.298
5.43
5.33
5.59
5.45
5.20
5.61
5.71
5.52
5.63
5.68
5.73
6.39
n/s
n/s
n/s
0.78
482.6
201.0
502.7
282.3
410.7
510.7
498.6
395.9
500.4
473.6
2.90
28.4
9.47
43.3
0.65
266.3
109.4
264.2
157.7
222.5
267.2
271.3
219.6
272.6
262.1
1.41
15.0
5.16
23.9
0.74
264.1
C
266.3
164.4
C
268.6
265.5
216.0
268.8
261.5
1.00
16.8
4.69
24.8
0.94
263.4
107.6
264.8
163.9
216.8
264.8
263.5
214.7
262.8
260.3
1.39
14.1
4.94
22.5

-------
Table 2.
            Data from an Injection MLS and Three MLS 1.4 to 2 m from the Injection Center One Day after Injection
MLS name and
sample port altitude, m
Part B: Additional sediment reactive constituents.
All concentrations are in micromolar
Al-total Al-EDTA Fe-total  Fe-EDTA  Mn-total
23B15- injection MLS
13.82
13.51
13.22
12.97
12.72
12.46
12.21
11.91
11.5
11.2
10.59
10.2
9.8
9.3
8.7

-------
Table 3.     Sample Types and Chemical Data Collected
Sample Type
Anion
(60 mL)
Cation
(20-30 mL)
Metal
speciation
(20 mL)
Treatment
R
F/A/R
F/X/A/R
Electrode
measurements
pH,Br
—
—
Absorbance
Spectrophotometry
Br, Cr(VI), EDTA
—
—
ICP-AES
—
total dissolved
metals
EDTA-metal
complexes
        R= refrigerated at 4 °C; F= filtered inline to <0.45 microns;
        A= acidified with 6 N HC1; X= passed through chelex-100 resin
Table 4.
           Summary of Analytical Methods
Constituent
Br
pH
O2(aq)-probe
O2(aq)-Chemet
EDTA

Cr(VI)
Dissolved Metals,
Cr
Cu
Ni
Pb
Zn
Fe
Al
Analytical error
±5-10%
±0.15pHunits
±10%
±20%
±7uM

±5%
ICP-AES
±5%
±5%
±5%
±5%
±5%
±5%
±7%
Method Limit of Detection
3 uM

30 uM
0.03 uM
2UM1
8uM2
0.3 uM

0.19uM
0.063 uM
0.51 uM
0.48 uM
0.15 uM
0.14uM
1.9 JIM
Reference
Kentetal, 1994
Estimated, this study
Kentetal., 1994
Kentetal., 1994
Estimated, this study

Kentetal., 1994

Estimated, this study3
Estimated, this study3
Estimated, this study3
Estimated, this study3
Estimated, this study3
Estimated, this study3
Estimated, this study3
         Refers to groundwater collected from the pristine zone of the aquifer.
        2 Refers to groundwater collected from the sewage-contaminated zone of the aquifer.
        3 Relative standard deviation of values measured at ten times the reported MDL. Values <10x
        MDL have significantly higher %RSD values (±10-25%).
                                                     20

-------
Table 5.
           Br Data Summary for Breakthrough MLS: BT1 and BT2
      BT#1, 37 m downgradient
BT#2, 52 m downgradient
Altitude
m
13.51
13.21
12.90
12.60
12.14
11.68
11.23
10.77
10.30
9.85
9.39
8.93
8.47
8.02
7.56
At
days
—
~
19.5
10.3
11.7
17.7
30.4
16.6
8.5
28.7
23.8
11.9
11.1
8.3
5.6
Avg. T(i)
days
—
—
61.2
56.7
67.4
82.1
77.7
67.9
71.0
85.5
94.2
97.7
93.1
90.0
79.1
aL
m
—
—
0.38
0.11
0.10
0.16
0.51
0.20
0.05
0.48
0.23
0.06
0.05
0.03
0.02
Altitude
m
13.65
13.14
12.63
12.13
11.62
11.11
10.60
10.10
9.59
9.08
8.58
8.07
7.56
7.05
6.54
At
days
—
np
24.8
15.0
34.6
18.5
17.7
19.2
19.8
22.7
20.5
10.0
4.2
—
-
Avg. T(i)
days
—
—
78.3
96.9
111
98.2
95.5
114
125
134
126
110
99.1
—
~
aL
m
—
—
0.48
0.11
0.45
0.17
0.17
0.14
0.12
0.14
0.13
0.04
0.01
—
-
      np = no peak, but bromide was detectable.
                                                   21

-------
Figures
   22

-------
                                 42°30'-/
                                         73°00'
                                          MASSACHUSETTS
                                                                    70°00'
                                 0    50 KILOMETERS
                                          50 MILES
                            70°35>""
                         41'39'r'1
                                                           70°31'30"
                         41 °35'
                                                           Sewage-disposal
                                                  Tracer- kmi&
                                                   test
                                                   site /;?§;?;jgi
                                                 pntarninate
                                                Ground Water
                                      {Cranberry
                                         Bogs
                                            0   500 METERS
                                            6   ' 2000 FEET
                                            EXPLANATION
                          — 75-J- WATER-TABLE CONTOUR-Shows
                                     altitude of water table, March 1993.
                                     Arrows show direction of ground-
                                     water flow. Contour interval 2 meters.
                                     Datum is sea level.
Figure 1.
Location of tracer-test site, area of sewage-contaminated groundwater, and general water-table contours, western Cape Cod,
Massachusetts.
                                                   23

-------
      16
      14
      12
      10
       8
       6
       4
 CD
 J)
 CO
 CD
 CO
 c
 CO
 Q)
 E
 CD
 O
 .0
 CO
 CD
 •
16
14
12
10
 8
 6
 4

16
14
12
10
 8
 6
 4

16
14
12
10
 8
 6
 4
         r  Zn2+, uM
r  B, uM
                                                40
         r   Mg, uM
 CO    16 ,==•
                                                          80
                                                                     100
                                                                                 120
                                                                                            140
                                                                                                        160
                                                                                                                   180
                                                                                                                               200
                                      meters downgradient from injection  center
Figure 2.
       Longitudinal cross sections showing the distributions of various water quality parameters in the aquifer in April 1993 just prior to the
       field experiment. The area shown is downgradient from the injection location.  The small circles indicate the locations where
       groundwater was collected. The filled small circles at the extreme left indicate the vertical spreading of the tracer cloud just after
       the injection.  Solid bars on the panels with data for DO, pH, and dissolved Zn show the locations of the two MLS used to collect
       data for constructing breakthrough curves.  Location of the transect is shown in Figure 3.
                                                               24

-------
                                                                       -10
        I  0
                     Distance from injection center, meters
                                                                       30
                                                                       40
                                                                      110
                                                                  I
                                                                  "£  120
                                                                    130
                                                                      140
                                                                      150
                                                                      160
                                                                      170
                                                                      180
                                                                      190
                                                                      200
                                                                                                         Background
                                                                                                           Chemistry Transect

                                                                                                         Multilevel Sampler
•   Injection Multilevel
      Sampler

*   Breakthrough Curve
      Multilevel Sampler

A  Multilevel Sampler
      Used to Define
      Zinc Contamination
                                                                                                  "BT1
                                                                                                    -BT2
                                                                                                             f
                                                                                                             Magnetic
                                                                                                             North
                                                                                                      General  Path
                                                                                                      of the Tracers
                                                                                 I
                                                                                        I
                                                                                               I
                                                                                                      I
                                                                                                             I
                                                                                                                    I
                                                                         20     10      0      -10     -20     -30     -40
                                                                                  Distance from injection center, meters
                                                                                                                          -so
Figure 3.      Locations of the general path of tracers, the multilevel samplers (MLS) available for sampling during the tracer test, the six injection
              MLS, the two breakthrough curve MLS, and the MLS used to construct background chemistry transects and to define the extent of
              zinc contamination.
                                                                  25

-------
  co  20
  CD
  "CD
  E
  CD

  !15
  CD
  CD
  CD
  E

  CD

  O
  .Q
  CD

  CD
  T3
      13
11
          N
p  _ Zn-^qntaminated regionT(p^~~tb^)	
^	.                                                   -^
                                                                            Oxic-

                                                                            Suboxic Boundary
             Sewage-contaminated zone
         0
                       50                      100                   150
                      Distance downgradlent from injection center, meters
                                                                                        200
Figure 4.     Generalized longitudinal cross section showing the spatial relationships between the different aquifer zones defined in the study.
           The hatched rectangle at the extreme left indicates the vertical range covered by the injection relative to the various geochemical
           conditions.
                                                   26

-------
            10

         w
         a:
         LU

         UJ 15
         LLJ 20
         o
         "Z.
         o
         I-
         o
  25
            30
o
ce

"- 35
LU
o



W 40

Q
            45
            50
            55
            60
            65
             10
                                0  °  °   Bromide
                                   0.2
                                   D.02

                                   0.002   Magnetic

                                           North
                                                           10
                                                           15
                                                           20
                                                  25
                                                           30
                                                           35
                                                           40
                                                           45
                                                           50
                                                           55
                                                           60
                                                           65
                                                                         °Q2°    Nickel


                                                                         .0.02

                                                                         .0.002   Magnetic

                                                                                 North

                                                                           3

                                                                           Day 13
                                                                              Day 83
                                                                                         0.2

                                 -5      -10     -15     -20      10     5      0-5

                                     DISTANCE FROM INJECTION CENTER, IN METERS


                                                EXPLANATION

                                      	Line of equal normalized concentration —

                                                dashed where approximately located.

                                                Interval is order of magnitude.

                                             Multilevel sampler

                                        •    Injection multilevel sampler

                                             Sampled multilevel sampler
                                                                                       -10     -15     -20
Figure 5.    Mapped distributions of the maximum Br and Ni concentrations of each MLS for the synoptic samplings at 13 and 83 days after the

           injection. Concentrations normalized by dividing by the injection concentrations.
                                                      27

-------
              16
              14
              12
              10
                                                                                    WATER TABLE
5

<   4

ra  16
LU



I-
LL1
Q


i=  12

<


   10
                            Day 13


                  Bromide
                                                                Day 83
                                                                                    i i i  i i i  i i i  i i i

                                                                                    WATER TABLE
                   Nickel
                           Day 13
                                                                          Day 83
                                    10
                                           15     20     25      30     35     40     45      50

                                        LONGITUDINAL DISTANCE FROM INJECTION CENTER, IN METERS
                                                                                                55
                                                                                                       60
                                                                                                              65
Figure 6.     Longitudinal and vertical extents of Br and Ni concentrations observed 13 and 83 days after injection.  Section aligned along the
             mean direction of transport. Extents of tracers marked by the 0.002 concentration contours, normalized by the injection concentra-

             tions.
                             3500
                             3000
                         03
                         E
                         ro
                         &_
                         O
                             2500
                  2000
                         03

                         CD   1500
                         CO
                             1000




                              500



                                0
                                     Injected Br Mass, 2708 grams
                                 0
                                   50          100          150

                                            Days after injection
                                                                                  200
                                                                                              250
Figure 7.     Calculated Br mass (zeroth moment) for each synoptic sampling.
                                                              28

-------
                                              120

                                              100

                                               80

                                               60

                                               40

                                               20

                                                0

                                              120

                                              100

                                               80

                                               60

                                               40

                                               20
     *

•     A
         1985-87 Experiment

      •  1993 Experiment

      	I	|	
                                                  0
                                                          50      100     150      200     250
                                                             DAYS FROM INJECTION
Figure 8.      (A) Calculated distance from the center of injection to the center of mass of Br (first moment) for each synoptic sampling.
              (B) Comparison of distances calculated in this (1993) and earlier (1985-87; Garabedian et al, 1991) experiments.
                                        Q
                                        LU a.
                                        0:0,
                                        0^165
                                                                                        15.0
                             LU >
                             Q LU
                                                        1993
                                                                           1994
                                                                                        14.5
                                                                                        14.0
                                                                                        13.5  uj LU
                                                                                             
                             Q LU
                        14.5  ID -1
                                                                                        14.0
                             a. en
                        13.5  uj LU
                             < LU
                                                                                        13.0
                                                            EXPLANATION
                                                        "•"  Water-Table Altitude

                                                        ~°-  Water-Table Gradient

Figure 9.      Water-table altitude measured in observation well FSW 343-36 (1.17 m, -46.66 m) and water-table gradient direction and magni-
              tude calculated from water-table altitudes measured in three observation wells (FSW 343-36, FSW 382-32 (66.57 m, 127.58 m),
              and FSW 414-36 (-87.17 m, 98.69 m)) at tracer-test site for 1993-94.  The spatial coordinates of the three wells (given in parenthe-
              sis: x, y) are in the same coordinate system used in all figures with the system centered on the tracer-test injection and aligned
              along the mean direction of transport observed in the  earlier large-scale tracer test (LeBlancet al., 1991).
                                                                   29

-------
                                               -50
                                               -25
                                               25
                                            £  50
                                            w
                                            O

                                            I
                                            CO
                                            D
                                               75
100
                                              125
                                               150
                                                   • '3.65 — -
                                                                             14.35-
                                                 50       25        0       -25      -50
                                                   DISTANCE FROM INJECTION CENTER,
                                                              IN METERS

                                                              EXPLANATION

                                                       WATER-TABLE CONTOUR-Shows
                                                        altitude of water table. Contour interval
                                                        0.05 meters. Datum is sea level
                                               -u.zo	 Day 48
                                               • 13.70	Day 237

                                                   •   WATER-LEVEL OBSERVATION WELL

                                                   A   CALCULATED CENTER OF MASS--
                                                        Bromide distribution
Figure 10.    Calculated location of the center of mass of Br (first moment) for each synoptic sampling. Water-table contours shown for 48 (solid
              lines) and 237 (dashed lines) days after injection.  Locations of only 7 of the 25 observation wells from which water-level data was
              collected are shown.  Others are located outside the mapped area.
                                          C  14
                                                                        Zinc-Contaminated
                                                                        region (pre-injection)
                                                   Distance downgradient of injection center, meters
Figure 11.    Calculated altitude of the center of mass of Br (first moment) for each synoptic sampling is shown as a function of the distance
              transported downgradient from the injection and relative to the Zn-contaminated region.
                                                                     30

-------
        c
        o

        "03

        "c
        CD
        o
        c
        o
        o
        CD
       .N

       "03

        E

        o
             0.03   -
             0.00
                    30
60         90         120        150


           Days since injection


   	Br      -A-EDTA         -O-Ni
180
210
Figure 12.   Typical pattern of breakthrough for Br, Ni, and EDTA.  Concentrations normalized by dividing by the injection concentrations.

           (A) Pristine zone, 37 meters downgradient, 12.9 m altitude; (B) Zn-contaminated region, 52 meters downgradient, 10.6 meters

           altitude; (C) suboxic zone, 52 meters downgradient, 8.58 meters altitude.
                                                     31

-------
                    LJJ
                 LU
                    LU
                    O 1.6  -
                                     50        100        150       200
                                          DAYS FROM INJECTION
                                                 250
Figure 13.    Comparison of water-table gradients calculated for this (1993) and earlier (1985-88; LeBlanc et al., 1991) experiments.
^
— 1
LJJ
LJJ
	 I
^^J
^^Q
LJJ CO
CO DC
> H
co ^
LJJ —
Q
H
|—
^

it
13
A
t
12

11


10


Q
I I I I
A 1985-88
^ • 1993-94
>^

• A
A
A
* A •
• • •_
A
A A
I I I I
                     0
50         100        150        200
     DAYS FROM INJECTION
250
Figure 14.    Comparison of calculated altitude of center of mass of Br for each synoptic sampling for this (1993) and earlier (1985-88;
           Garabedian et al., 1991) experiments.
                                                  32

-------
                                                      0           5          10

                                                         Days after injection
                                                                                         15
Figure 15.     Concentration versus time plots at a sampling port in the pristine zone (13.0 m above mean sea level) at a distance 1.7 m
              downgradient from the center of the array of injection MLS.  Location of MLS (2414A) is shown in Figure 3 (filled triangle closest to
              the array of injection MLS). (A) Normalized concentrations of Ni, Cr, and Pb (scale on left-hand side) and pH values (scale on right-
              hand side). (B) Concentrations of Ca and Mg (scale on the left-hand side) and  K and Na (scale on the right-hand side).
                         1000
                      0>
                                                        Days after injection
Figure 16.     Breakthrough curves (BT1,  Fig. 3, 37 m downgradient) from the pristine zone (12.1 m above mean sea level) for K, Na, Ca, Mg
              (scale on left-hand side) and for pH (scale on right-hand side). Also shown are breakthrough curves for Br and Ni,  in arbitrary
              concentration units, in order to illustrate the delay between the pH fluctuation and the breakthrough of reactive tracers.
                                                                 33

-------
                                1.0
                           -    0.8
                            c
                            CD
                            O
                           O
                                0.6
                                0.4
                            CD
                            E
                            O  0.2
                                0.0
                               1500
_B —
-O-
V
A
PH
Ni, C/C0
Cr C/C0
Pb C/C0
     O
                            -   1000
                           03
                           CD

                           CD
                          O
                                500
                                              5
                                              5000
                                                                                                4000
                                                                                                3000
                                              2000
                                                                                                1000
                                   -5
0              5             10

    Days after injection
                                                                                              15
Figure 17.    Concentration versus time plots at a sampling port in the transition zone (10.8 m above mean sea level) at a distance 1.7 m
             downgradient from the center of the array of injection MLS. Location of MLS (2414A) is shown in Figure 3 (filled triangle closest to
             the array of injection MLS). (A) Normalized concentrations of Ni, Cr, and Pb (scale on left-hand side) and pH (scale on right-hand
             side). (B) Concentrations of K, Ca, and Mg (scale on the left-hand side) and Na (scale  on the right-hand side).
                                                                 34

-------
                      1200
                  "§.  1000  -
                  c
                  o
                  *-4-»
                  2


                  I
                  o
                  o
                  Q
                  LU
                  ro
                  CD
                               Y= 1.03X -1.33, FT = 0.985
800   -
600   -
                       400  -
200   -
                                      200       400       600       800       1000

                                    I(AI, Cu, Fe, Ni, Pb, Zn) concentrations, |j,M
                                                                    1200
Figure 18.    Correlation between the sum of the concentrations of dissolved Cu, Ni, Zn, Pb, Al, and Fe, and measured EDTA concentrations.
            Data are from metal speciation samples in the synoptic and breakthrough curve samplings. Samples were collected at several
            elevations of BT1, BT2, and along a longitudinal transect of MLS through the center of the tracer clouds during the synoptic
            samplings.
               14000
                12000
         HIM
         DFe
         • Ni
         D Cu+Pb+Zn
                                   13     48      83     111    146    175

                                                   Days since injection
                                                        210    237    314
Figure 19.    Mass distribution of metals complexed with EDTA in the tracer cloud as a function of time after injection.  The total height of the bar
            for each sampling represents an estimate of the mass of EDTA being transported.
                                                          35

-------
                             1,1


                             LU r.ri

                             LLJ LU




                             LJJ —
                                       0        ;"5        50        75        100       12S
                                      DISTANCE FROM r-U CTION CENTER. IN ME'ERE
Figure 20.    Calculated altitudes of the centers of mass of Br and Ni (first moments) for each synoptic sampling relative to the horizontal
             distance traveled.  Extent of Zn-contaminated region defined by 0.5 |iM concentration contour shown in Figure 3.
                                 1.5
                              05
                              8  1.0
                             T3
                              (D
                              N
                             "ro

                              o  0.5
                                 0.0

                                 1.5
                              eo  1.0 ^
                              ro
                              E
                              0)

                              1g
                              0)
                              Q:  0.5
                                 0.0
                                                                          • Br
                                                                          n EDTA
                                                                          o Ni
                                                                                  B
                                                                          n EDTA
                                                                          o Ni
                                            50    100   150   200    250

                                                     Days since injection
300    350
Figure 21.    (A) Calculated Br, EDTA, and Ni masses (zeroth moments) for each synoptic sampling normalized by the total mass of injected
             tracer. (B) Relative mass of Ni and EDTA calculated by dividing the normalized mass by the normalized Br mass for each synoptic
             sampling. The EDTA mass was increasingly overestimated with time, because the sum includes an unknown mass of Zn2+ present
             in the Zn-contaminated region.
                                                             36

-------

o
o Q:
LJJ UJ
^ i— •
— ^
^
a: ~
LL a:
0^
c/j °
Q

i/u

100

75


50

25

Di
I I I I I I Q
O
"
• O
— —
• o
o
o ^
• • Bromide
~ 8 ° Nickel

B i i i i i i
                                         50     100     150     200    250    300     350

                                                 DAYS FROM INJECTION
Figure 22.    Calculated distances from the center of injection to the center of mass of Br and Ni (first moments) for each synoptic sampling.
                                           -50
                                           -25
                                        a:
                                        ui   o
                                        £  25
                                        UJ
                                        o
                                        ^  50

                                        O
                                        ui
                                           75
                                        Ul
                                        o
                                           100
                                           125
                                           150
 CALCULATED CENTER OF MASS-


•  Bromide Distribution


°  Nickel Distribution




              e — 0 Days

              •—13 Days



               g— 48 Days




                *J^ 83 Days


                O~^.111 Days



                 ^^146 Days

                *C
                    175 Days
                    210 Days
                                                       237 Days
                                                               ^i


                                                       314 Days—o
                                             50      25       0       -25       -50

                                                DISTANCE FROM INJECTION CENTER,

                                                          IN METERS
Figure 23.    Calculated location of the centers of mass of Br and Ni (first moments) for each synoptic sampling.
                                                            37

-------
         0)
         re
         o>


         c
         re
         o>

         E

         o>

         o
         .Q
         re
         o>
             14




             13
12   -
         >  11   I
10   -
 9




 8




 7




 6




 5
                 0
                      1
                  Attenuation, Area,/ AreaBr
    1.5         2

Retardation factor
2.5
Figure 24.    Transport parameters for EDTA and Ni at BT1 and BT2. The shaded area indicates the sampling ports in the Zn-contaminated

           region.  (A) Attenuation of EDTA and Ni relative to the mass of Br transported. (B) Retardation of EDTA and Ni relative to Br.
                                                   38

-------