r/EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Solid Waste and
Emergency Response
(5305W)
EPA530-D-98-001B
July 1998
www.epa.gov/osw
Human Health Risk
Assessment Protocol for
Hazardous Waste
Combustion Facilities
Volume Two
Appendix A
Peer Review Draft
Printed on paper that contains at least 20 percent postconsumer fiber
-------
-------
APPENDIX A
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC DATA
HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL
July 1998
A-l
A-2
A-3
A-4
CHEMICALS FOR CONSIDERATION AS COMPOUNDS OF
POTENTIAL CONCERN
TARGET ORGANS AND CRITICAL EFFECTS FOR COMPOUNDS WITH REFERENCE DOSES
COMPOUND SPECIFIC PARAMETER VALUES
ACUTE BENCHMARKS
-------
-------
APPENDIX A-l
INFORMATION ON COMPOUNDS OF POTENTIAL INTEREST
-------
-------
TABLE A-1
INFORMATION ON COMPOUNDS OF POTENTIAL INTEREST
(Page 1 of 24)
CAS Number
50-004
50-06-6
50-07-7
50-18-0
50-29-3
50-32-8
51-28-5
51-43-4
51-79-6
52-85-7
53-70-3
53-96-3
54-11-5
55-18-5
55-38-9
55-63-0
55-91-4
564)4-2
56-23-5
56-38-2
5649-5
56-53-1
56-55-3
Compound Name
Formaldehyde (methylene oxide)
Phenobaibital
4,4'-DDT
Benzo(a)pyrene
2,4-Dinitropbenol
Ethyl carbamate (urethane)
Carbon tetrachloride
Diethylstilbestrol
Benzo(a)anthracene
-------
g
ON
I
A
V
Thioacetam
8-
8
Vs
I;
,
s
B
S
5
*
u>
X
X
5
ta
3-
1
X
X
1
I
a
00
HJ
e^
\
I
ij
s
Amitrole
I
Dieldrin
X
9
n
2
t
B>
If
Methyl hydra
3
S
D
9
|
1
X
j
i*
i
i
7;
1
1
|
u>
«,
3
|
!
1
1
M
W
4,6-Tetrachlo
r
a
,
s
'M
a
.»
i
i— »
X
10
1-1
1
1
X
1
•a
mma-BHC (D
|
|
3
|;J
1
|
*
1
g
ft
»
X
X
1
i
§
i
in
1
T3
i'
X
X
s
""
-Dimethyl by
§
B
3
K
o
iS
1
X
X
?
3
5
2
troquinoline-1
1
!
«
I
i
Compounds listed in
40CERPUt261
Appendix VH or Vm
Chemical-Spedflc
DataATBilaMe
PICs Recommended
byU.S.EPA(1994c)
forAUHHRAs
U.S. EPA Compounds
Identified In
Combustion Unit
Emissions (1993)
U.S. EPA
Recommended and
Potential PICs (1994)
PICs in Stack
Emissions Actually
Detected
-------
TABLE A-1
INFORMATION ON COMPOUNDS OF POTENTIAL INTEREST
(Page 3 of 24)
CAS Number
62-73-7
62-74-8
62-75-9
63-25-2
64-17-5
64-18-6
64-64-7
64-67-5
65-85-0
66-27-3
66-75-1
67-56-1
67-64-1
67-66-3
67-72-1
68-12-2
70-25-7
70-304
71-43-2
71-55-6
72-20-8
72-33-3
72-43-5
72-54-8
72-55-9
72-57-1
Compound Name
Dichlorovos
Fluoroacetic acid, sodium salt
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
Carbaryl
Ethanol
Formic acid (methanoic acid)
Di-n-propylnitrosamine
Diethyl sulfate'
Benzoic acid
Methyl methanesulfonate
Uracil mustard
Methanol
Acetone
Chloroform (trichloromethane)
Hexachloroethane (perchloroethane)
Dimethyl formamide
N-Methyl-N'-nitto-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG)
Hexachloropbene
Benzene
Methyl chloroform (1,1,1-trichloroethane)
Endrin
Mestranol
Methoxychlor
4,4'-DDD
DDE
Trypan blue
3 g
« 8 h
.a -H 8
«**
K156
K009, K010
F024, F025, K009, K010, K019, K020, K021, K029, K073,
K116, K149, K150, K151, K158
F024, F025, K016, K030, K073
F005, F024, F025, F037, F038, K085, K104, K105, K141,
K142, K143, K144, K145, K147, K151, K159
F001, F002, F024, F025, K019, K020, K028. K029, K096
"s ^
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
PIPjc RwWiWWnifrd
by U.S. EPA (1994c)
forAUHHRAs
U.S. EPA Compounds
Identified in
Combustion Unit
Emissions (1993)
X
X
X
X
U.S. EPA
Recommended and
Potential PICs (1994)
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
l|i
X
X
X
X
X
Note: See Table A-1 References and Discussion (Appendix A-1) for explanation of the information presented.
A-1-3
-------
TABLE A-1
INFORMATION ON COMPOUNDS OF POTENTIAL INTEREST
(P*g*4of24)
CAS Number
74-83-9
74-87-3
74-88-4
74-90-8
74-93-1
74-95-3
74-97-5
754)0-3
75-01-4
75-05-8
75-07-0
75-09-2
75-15-0
75-21-8
75-25-2
75-27-4
75-29-6
75-34-3
75-35-4
75-36-5
75-44-5
75-45-6
75-55-8
75-56-9
75-60-5
75-69-4
75-70-7
Compound Name
Bromomethane (methylbromide)
Chloromethane (methyl chloride)
Methyl iodide (lodomethane)
Hydrogen cyanide
Thiomethanol
Methylene bromide
Bromochloromethane
Chloroethane
Vinyl chloride
Acetonitrile
Acetaldehyde
Methylene chloride
Carbon disulfide
Ethylene oxide
Bromoform
Bromodichloromethane
2-Chloropropane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dicbloroethene
Acetyl chloride
Phosgene (hydrogen phosphide)
Chlorodifluoromethane
1,2-Propylenimine (2-methyl aziridine)
Propylene oxide
Cacodylic acid
Trichiorofiuoromethane (Freon 11)
Trichloromethanethiol
3 ^ H
ii *
IE?
K131, K132
F024, F025, K009, K010, K149, K150, K157
K011, K013
F024, F025, K019, K020, K028, K029
K011, K013, K014
F001, F002, F024, F025, K009, K010, K156, K157, K158
F005
F024, F025
F024, F025, K019, K020, K029
K116
FOOI.F002
1
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
V
A
X
X
X
X
PI Cs RfCfKiinmidcd
byU.S.EPA(1994c)
forAUHHRAs
U.S. EPA Compounds
Identified in
Combustion Unit
Emissions (199$
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
U.S. EPA
Recommended and
Potential PICs (1994)
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
PICs in Stack
Emissions Actually
Detected
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
i and Discussion i
ndix A-1) for explanation of the information presented.
A-1-4
-------
TABLE A-1
INFORMATION ON COMPOUNDS OF POTENTIAL INTEREST
(Page 5 of 24)
CAS Number
75-71-8
75-86-5
75-87-6
76-01-7
76-13-1
76-44-8
77-47-4
77-78-1
78-00-2
78-32-0
78-34-2
78-59-1
78-83-1
78-87-5
78-93-3
78-97-7
79-00-5
79-01-6
79-06-1
79-10-7
79-11-8
79-19-6
79-20-9
79-22-1
79-34-5
79-44-7
79-46-9
Compound Name
Dichlorodifluoromethane
2-Methylactonitrile
Chloral
Pentachloroethane
l,l,2-Trichloro-l,2,2-trifluoroethane(Freon 113)
Heptachlor
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Dimethyl sulfate
Tetraethyl lead
Tri-p-tolyl phosphate
Dioxathion
Isophorone
Isobutyl alcohol
1,2-Dichloropropane
2-Butanone (methyl ethyl ketone)
2-Hydroxypropionitrile
1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Acrylamide
Acrylic acid
Chloroacetic acid
Thiosemicarbazide
Methyl acetate
Methyl chlorocarbonate
1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Dimethyl carbamoyl chloride
2-Nitropropane
.9 a
|P
F024, F025
F001.F002
K097
F024, F025, K032, K033, K034
K131
F005
F005
F002, F024, F025, K019, K020, K095, K096
F001, F002, F024, F025, K018, K019, K020
K014
.
F024, F025, K019, K020, K030, K073, K095, K150
F005
8 ^ t-
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
PICs Recommended
by U.S. EPA (1994c)
forAUHHRAs
U.S. EPA Compounds
IdentiBed in
Combustion Unit
Emissions (1993)
X
X
X
X
U.S. EPA
Recommended and
Potential PICs (1994)
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
PICs in Stack
Emissions Actually
Detected
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Note: See Table A-1 References and Discussion (Appendix A-1) for explanation of the information presented.
A-1-5
-------
S
3
?
I
!
(O
8
Compounds Listed in
40 CFR Part 261
Appendix Vn or Vm
X
X
X
X
X
X
Chemical-Specific
Data Available
PICs Pfwiffnfffimfril
byU.S.EPA(1994c)
forAUHHRAs
U.S. EPA Compounds
Identified in
Combustion Unit
Emissions (1993)
X
U.S.EPA
Recommended and
Potential PICs (1994)
PICs in Stack
i Actually
Detected
-------
TABLE A-1
INFORMATION ON COMPOUNDS OF POTENTIAL INTEREST
(Page 7 of 24)
CAS Number
91-59-8
91-80-5
91-94-1
92-52-4
92-67-1
92-87-5
92-93-3
93-72-1
94-58-6
94-59-7
. 94-75-7
95-06-7
95^*7-6
95-48-7
95-50-1
95-53-4
95-57-8
95-79-4
95-80-7
95-83-0
95-94-3
95-95-4
96-09-3
96-12-8
96-18-4
96-23-1
96-45-7
Compound Name
2-Naphthylaraine (beta-naphthylamine)
Methapyrilene
3,3'-DichlorobenzidiiB
Bipfaeayl
4-Aminobiphenyl
Benzidine
4-Nitrobiphenyl
Silvex
Dihydrosaffrole
Safrole (5-(2-Propenyl)-l,3-benzodioxole)
2,4-D
Sulfallate
o-Xylene (dimethyl benzene)
o-Cresol
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
o-Tohiidine
2-Chloropnenol
5-Chloro-2-methylaniline
2,4-Toluene diamine
4-CWoro-l,2-phenylenediamine
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
2,4,5-TrichIorophenol
Styrene oxide
l,2-Dibromo-3-chIoropropane
1 ,2,3-Trichloropropane
1 ,3-Dichloro-2-propanol
Elhylene thiourea
3 a
lp
1
F027
F004
F002, F024, F025, K042, K085, K105
K112, K113, K114
K001
K112, K113, K114, K115, K027
K085, K149, K150, K151
F020, F023, F027, F028, K001
K123, K124, K125, K126
flhomlnil-fSjif^ifif
Data Available
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
PTPu Rix-nmnvn^c^
by U.S. EPA (1994c)
forAUHHRAs
-
U.S. EPA Compounds
Identified in
Combustion Unit
Emissions (1993)
X
X
X
X
X
X
U.S.EPA
•Recommended and II
Potential PICs (1994)
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
w
X
X
X
X
Note: See Table A-1 References and Discussion (Appendix A-1) for explanation of the information presented.
A-1-7
-------
TABLE A-1
INFORMATION ON COMPOUNDS OF POTENTIAL INTEREST
(Page 8 of 24)
CAS Number
97-63-2
98-01-1
98-07-7
98-82-8
98-83-9
98-86-2
98-87-3
98-95-3
99-09-2
99-35-4
99-55-8
99-59-2
99-65-0
100-01-6
KXV02-7
100-25-4
100-41-4
100-42-5
100-44-7
100-51-6
100-52-7
100-75-4
101-05-3
101-14-4
101-27-9
101-55-3
101-61-1
Compound Name
Ethyl methaciylate
Furfural
Benzo trichloride
Cumene
Methyl styiene (mixed isomers)
Acetophenone
Benzal chloride
Nitrobenzene
3-Nitroaniline
1 ,3,5-Trinitrobenzene
5-Nitro-o-toluidine
5-Nitro-o-anisidine
1 ,3-Dinitrobenzene
4-Nitroaniline (p-nitroaniline)
4-Nitrophenol (p-nitrophenol)
1,4-Dinitrobenzene (p-dinitrobenzene)
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Benzyl chloride
Benzyl alcohol
Benzaldehyde
N-Nitrosopiperidine
Anilazine
4,4'-Methylenebis (2-chloroaniline)
Barban
4-Bromophenyi phenyi ether
4,4'-Methylenebis (N,N-dimethylaniline)
S - 1
11 s
0 $
K015, K149
F004, K083, K103, K104
K025
K015, K085, K149
Chemical-Specific
Data Available
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
FICs Recommended
by U.S. EPA (1994c)
forAUHHRAs
--
U.S. EPA Compounds
Identified in
Combustion Unit
Emissions (1993)
X
X
X
X
X
U.S. EPA
Recommended and
Potential PICs (1994)
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
PICs in Stack
Emissions Actually ( 1
Detected II
X
X
X
X
Note: See Table A-1 References and Discussion (Appendix A-1) for explanation of the information presented.
A-1-8
-------
TABLE A-1 ''
INFORMATION ON COMPOUNDS OF POTENTIAL INTEREST
(Page 9 of 24)
CAS Number
101-68-8
101-79-9
101-80-4
102-82-9
103-33-3
103-85-5
105-60-2
105-67-9
10642-3
106-44-5
106-46-7
10647-8
10649-0
106-50-3
106-514
106-88-7
106-89-8
106-934
106-99-0
107-02-8
107-05-1
107-06-2
107-07-3
107-10-8
107-12-0
107-13-1
107-18-6
Compound Name
Methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI)
4,4-Methylenedi aniline
4,4'-Oxydianiline
Tributylamine
Azobenzene
Phenylthiourea
Caprolactam
2,4-Dimethylphenol
p-Xylene (dimethyl benzene)
p-Cresol (4-methyl phenol)
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
p-Chloroaniline
p-Toluidine
p-Phenylenediamine
Quinone
1,2-Epoxybutane
Epichlotohydrin (l-chloro-2,3 epoxypropane)
Ethylene dibromide
1,3-Butadiene
Acrolein
Allyl chloride
1,2-Dichloroethane (ethylene dichloride)
2-Chloroethanol
n-Propylamine
Propionitrile
Acrylonitrile
Allyl alcohol
K001
F004
F024, F025, K085, K105, K149, K150
K112, K113.K114
K017
K117,K118,K136
F024, F025
F024, F025, K018, K019, K020, K029, K030, K096
K011, K013
1 %
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
PICs Recommended
by U.S. EPA (1994c)
forAUHHRAs
U.S. EPA Compounds
Identified in
Combustion Unit
Emissions (1993)
X
X
X
X
X
X
U.S. EPA
Recommended and II
Potential PICs (1994)
:===
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
x
X
X
X
x
X
PICs in Stack
Emissions Actually
Detected
X
X
X
X
Note: See Table A-1 References and Discussion (Appendix A-1) for explanation of the information presented.
A-1-9
-------
I
*
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Compounds Lilted in
40 CER Part 261
Appendix VII or VHI
Chemlcal-Spedflc
DataATailabk
PICs Recommended
byU.S.EPA(1994c)
forAUHHRAs
U.S. EPA Compoundi
Identified In
Combustion Unit
Emissions (1993)
U.S. EPA
Recommended and
Potential PICs (1994)
PICs In Stack
Emissions Actually
Detected
i
"
-------
I
B)
g.
i
s
g
5
£
2
I
X
X
X
X
I
S3
Compounds Listed in
40 CFR Part 261
Appendix VH or Vffl
Chemical-Speciflc
Data Available
PICsRi
by U.S. EPA (1994c)
forAllHHRAs
U.S. EPA Compounds
Identified in
Combustion Unit
Emissions (1993)
U.S. EPA
Recommended and
Potential PICs (1994)
PICs in Stack
Emissions Actually
Detected
£
o
*
-------
Iro
i
1
B
X
i
V
I
s
i
(0
5
Ul
j
i
5"
1
X
1
|
|
2
1
X
u>
»•-*
f
1
E
X
X
X
i
»•*
1
I
5'
^
*
f
6
X
X
X
!
f
1
g.
S-
55 -"•
• 2
M
PS
h«*
X
X
X
X
i
1
n
1
f
£.*
X
X
1
X
X
X
t
1
w
S
p
i
1
S
1
S
I
,
f
1
X
X
!
1
f
B.
,w
S
X
X
1
oo
V
q
&
1
i— »
s
i
R
X
to
1
25
25
•s.
3
f
to
1"
§'
S
.5*
PS
to
M
|
£J
i
PS
>"
PS
X
X
to
to
I
1
C3*
Ui
i
X
X
X
i
55
,
1
M*
Compounds Listed in
40 CER Part 261
Appendix VH or VIH
Cbemlcal-SpedQc
Data Ayailflble
PICs Keconmif nded
byU.S.EPA(1994c)
forAUHHRAs
U.S. EPA Compounds
Identified In
Combustion Unit
Emissions (1993)
U.S. EPA
Recommended and
Potential PICs (1994)
PICs in Stack
Emissions ActUflHy
Detected
i
n
I
,
* 1
-------
I
01
Q.
D
I
oT
CO
S
B
E
S
PS
X
X
*
!
*
3
I
•3
f
5
E
i
3
s
3
i
s
3
X
x
X X
X
X
X X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
B'
I
Compounds Listed in
40 CFR Part 261
Appendix VU or Vm
Chemical-Specific
Data Available
PICs Recommended
by U.S. EPA (1994c)
forAUHHRAs
U.S. EPA Compounds
Identified in
Combustion Unit
Emissions (1993)
U.S. EPA
Recommended and
Potential PICs (1994)
PICs in Stack
Emissions Actually
Detected
1
i
rn
-------
'
•f
a
1
1
s
i
Id
g
1
«
P
p
1
Id
?.
2
1
§
p
1
i
8-
$
1
I
IA
i
n
X
X
1
1"
'
p
1
*J§
a
da
33
-9
^
X
X
V
1
2
F
I
fe
O
I
1
•fl
|
1
1
t£
X
Id
g
§
1
£
2
|
d.
f
£
33
p.
1
Id
I
P*
a
X
Id
Q
«.
X
1
o
d
1
X
td
5?
n
s
I
g4
s
i
J*
8
X
1
1
§'
X
M
I
?
o
1
to
O
9
w
f
9
n
i
i
»
t
1
.«?_.
i
*
f
V
1
si
g
jjf
S
^>
^
Q
|
bi
X
X
i
•z
%
Compounds Listed in
40 CFR Part 261
Appendix VH or Vffl
Chemical-Specific
Data Available
FICs Recommended
by U.S. EPA (1994c)
forAUHHRAs
U.S. EPA Compounds
Identified in
Combustion Unit
Emissions (1993)
U.S. EPA
Recommended and
Potential PICs (1994)
PICs in Stack
Emissions Actually
Detected
-------
TABLE A-1
INFORMATION ON COMPOUNDS OF POTENTIAL INTEREST
(Page 15 of 24)
CAS Number
460-19-5
463-58-1
465-73-6
470-90-6
479-45-8
492-80-8
494-03-1
504-24-5
505-60-2
506-61-6
506-64-9
506-68-3
506-77-4
510-15-6
512-56-1
528-29-0
532-27-4
534-52-1
540-36-3
540-73-8
540-84-1
541-53-7
541-73-1
542-62-1
542-76-7
542-88-1
Compound Name'
Cyanogen (oxaloninile)
Tetryl
Potassium silver cyanide
Dithiobiuret
-S - 1
It**
3*5.
F006, F007, F008, F009, F010, F011, F012, F019, K007,
K088
F006, F012, F019, K007, K088
F004
F024, F025, K085, K105
K017
I! <
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
PICs Recommended
by U.S. EPA (1994c)
forAUHHRAs
U.S. EPA Compounds
Identified in
Combustion Unit
Emissions (1993)
X
U.S. EPA
Recommended and II
Potential PICs (1994)
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
PICs in Stack
Emissions Actually
Detected
X
Note: See Table A-1 References and Discussion (Appendix A-1) for explanation of the information presented.
A-1-15
-------
TABLE A-1
(Page 16 of 24)
CAS Number
544-92-3
557-19-7
557-21-1
563-12-2
563-68-8
584-84-9
59040-2
591-08-2
591-78-6
592-01-8
593-60-2
598-31-2
602-87-9
606-20-2
608-93-5
615-53-2
621-64-7
623-40-5
624-83-9
628-86-4
630-104
630-20-6
636-21-5
640-19-7
680-31-9
684-93-5
692-42-2
Compound Name
Copper cyanide
Nickel cyanide
Zinc cyanide
Ethion
Thalliuin(I)acetate
2,4-Toluene diisocyanate
Bromoethene
l-Acetyl-2-thiourea
2-Hexanone (butyl methyl ketone)
Calcium cyanide
Vinyl bromide
Bromoacetone
5-Nitroacenaphthene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Pentachlorobenzene
N-Nitroso-N-methylurethane
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
Toluene-2,6-diamme
Methyl isocyanate
Mercury fulminate
Selenourea
1 , 1 , 1 ,2-Tetrachloroethane
o-Toluidine hydrochloride
Fluoroacetamide
Hexamethylphosphoramide
N-Nitroso-N-methylurea
Diethylarsine
3 i
11S
iSp
Q J?
K027
F024, F025, K085, K149, K150, K151
F024, F025, K019, K020, K030, K095
Chemical-Spedflc H
Data Available 11
X
X
V
X
X
PICs Recommended
byU.S.EPA(1994c)
forAUHHRAs
U.S. EPA Compounds
Idendfledin
Combustion Unit
Emissions (1993)
X
X
1 U.S. EPA I
Recommended and 1
Potential PICs (1994) I
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
PICs in Stsck
Emissions Actually
Detected
X
>A-H
ences and Discussion (Appendix A-1) for explanation of the information presented.
A-1-16
-------
TABLE A-1
INFORMATION ON COMPOUNDS OF POTENTIAL INTEREST
(Page 17 of 24)
CAS Number
696-28-6
732-11-6
755-04-5
757-58-4
759-73-9
764-41-0
765-344
786-19-6
822-064
. 924-16-3
930-55-2
959-98-8
961-11-5
1024-57-3
1031-07-8
1116-54-7
1120-714
1303-28-2
1314-32-5
1314-62-1
1319-77-3
1327-53-3
1330-20-7
1332-214
1335-32-6
1336-36-3
1338-234
Compound Name
Dichlorophenylaisine
Phosmet
Titanium tetrachloride
Hsxaethyl tetraphcsphate
N-Nitroso-N-ethylurea
1 ,4-DichIoro-2-butene
Glycidylaldebyde
Carbophenothion
Hexamethylene-1 ,5-diisocyanate
N-Nitroso-di-n-Buetylamine
N-Nitrosopyrrolidine
EndosulfanI
Tetrachlorvinphos
Heptachlor epoxide
Endosulfan sulfate
N-Nitrosodiethanolamine
1,3-Propane sultone
Arsenic pentoxide
Thallic oxide
Vanadium pentoxide
Cresols/cresylic acid (isomers and mixtures)
Arsenic trioxide
Xylene (total)
Asbestos
Lead subacetate
Polychlorinated biphenyls (209 congeners)
2-Butanone peroxide
11 s
*£$
5 -I1
F004
Chemical-Specific
Data Available 1
X
X
X
X
X
PICs Recommended
by U.S. EPA (1994c)
for AU HHRAs
U.S. EPA Compounds
Identified in
Combustion Unit
Emissions (1993)
X
X
U.S. EPA 1
Recommended and ||
Potential PICs (1994)
X
X
X
X
X
X
PICs in Stack
Emissions Actually
Detected
•
X
X
Note: See Table A-1 References and Discussion (Appendix A-1) for explanation of the information presented.
A-1-17
-------
$
X
X
V
1
I
-75
X
X
X
Compounds Listed in
40 CFR Part 261
Appendix VD or Vm
Chemical-Speclflc
Data Available
PICs Recommended
byU.S.EPA(1994c)
forAUHHRAs
U.S. EPA Compounds
Identified in
Combustion Unit
Emissions (1993)
U.S. EPA
Recommended and
Potential PICs (1994)
PICs in Stack
Emissions Actually
Detected
o
_
-------
1
s-
«
£
71
fi>
3.
o
CO
(0
o
f
Q.
R-
?
§
B>
^
«k
(O
723-14-0 |
Phosphorus
700-17-6
V
1
1
X
1
x
1
(I
Hydrogen fluor
fr
^
664-38-2
Phosphoric ac
a
<
£
V
|
Chloride (hydr
|
^
X
^
488-56-4
Selenium sulf
8-
§
j
Mercuric chloi
§
V
446-18-6
M
^
.
*
i
X
-------
^
i
13765-19-0
2
13463-39-3
Z
1
•— '
i
f
t
1
•
i
i
K)
£
|
*1*
&
0\
X
1
£
1
*l*
!
I
i
"^
1
1
^
1
7
g
11104-28-2
%
|
T*
g
[1097-69-1
^
1
IJ
X
!n
^
|
T
0595-95-6
Z
0102-45-1
i
i
1
2
Z
1
I
X
0102-43-9
z
i-
i
1
1
f
'
|
f
i
^^
7803-55-6
|
1
1
^
I
r
i
i
e^
i.
1
7786-34-7
^
i
i
1
3
7783-00-8
f
i
§.
8-
1
i
X
f
1
X
X
t
1
i
>
1
I
1
1
i
3
'•
Compounds Listed in
40 CFR Part 261
Appendix VH or VEQ
Cbemical-SpedQc
Data Available
PICfi Recommeiided
byU.S.EPA(1994c)
forAUHHRAs
U.S. EPA Compounds
Identified in
Combustion Unit
Emissions (1993)
U.S.EPA
Recommended and
Potential HCs (1994)
PICs in Stack
Emissions Actually
Detected
o w >
1 8"
-------
TABLE A-1
INFORMATION ON COMPOUNDS OF POTENTIAL INTEREST
(Page 21 of 24)
CAS Number
16752-77-5
18540-29-9
18883-66-4
19408-74-3
20816-12-0
20830-81-3
20859-73-8
21609-90-5
22967-92-6
23950-58-5
25013-15-4
25265-76-3
2537645-8
26471-62-5
33213-65-9
33245-39-5
35822-46-9
39196-18-4
39227-28-6
39300-45-3
40321-76-4
53469-21-9
53494-70-5
55673-89-7
57117-41-6
57117-44-9
Compound Name
Methomyl
Chromium (hexavalent)
Streptozotocin
1 ,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzo(p)dioxin
Osmium tetroxide
Daunomycin
Aluminum phosphide
Leptophos
Methyl mercury
Pronamide
Methyl styrene
Phenylenediamine
Toluenediamine
Toluene diisocyanate
Endosulfan II
Fluchloralin
l,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzo(p)dioxin
Thiofanox
l,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorxxliben2o(p)dioxin
Dinocap
1 ,2,3,7,8-PentachIorodibenzo(p)dioxin
Arochlor-1242
Endrin ketone
1 ,2,3,4,7,8,9-Heptachlorodibenzofiiran
2,3,4,7, 8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran
£ H
.•gs£
' J 2 S
0 Sf
F006, F019, K002, K003, K004, K005, K006, K007, K008,
K048, K049, K050, K051, K061, K062, K069, K086, K100
F021, F022. F026, F027, F028, F032
K083, K103, K104
F032
F021, F022, F026, F027, F028, F032
F020, F021, F022, F023, F026, F027, F028, F032
F032
F020, F021, F022. F023, F026, F027, F028, F032
F021, F022, F026, F027, F028, F032
Chemical-Specific
Data Available
X
X
X
X
PICs Recommended
by U.S. EPA (1994c)
forAUHHRAs
U.S. EPA Compounds
Identified in
Combustion Unit
Emissions (1993)
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
U.S. EPA
Recommended and ||
Potential PICs (1994)
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
PICs in Stack
Emissions Actually
Detected
X
X
X
Note: See Table A-1 References and Discussion (Appendix A-1) for explanation of the information presented.
A-1-21
-------
•2-
i
o
a
a
a
Compounds listed In
40 CER Part 261
Appendix VH or Vin
Chemkal-Spedflc
DataAvailabte
PICs Recommended
byU.S.EPA(1994c)
forADHHRAs
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
U.S. EPA Compoundi
Identlfledln
CombtistioalMt
EmlsstoDS (1993)
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
U.S. EPA
Recommended and
Potential PICs (1994)
X
X
PICs in Stack
Emissions Actually
Detected
-------
1
5
i ,
i
•
'
i
z
i
z
1
!
1
i
1
!
i
Dichloropropene |
i
1
Dichloropropanols |
i
•
i
i
1
1
•
1
i
1
S
«
i
i
i
I
i
to
1
i
1
1
1
1
i
1
Sf
e
1
i
I
'
1
!
1
|
1
!
1
i
1
'
I
f
Compounds Usted in
40 CFR Part 261
Appendix VH or Vm
Chemical-Specific
Data Available
PICs Recommended
byU.S.EPA(1994c)
for AUHHRAs
U.S. EPA Compounds
Identified in
Combustion Unit
Emissions (1993)
U.S. EPA
Recommended suid
Potential PICs (1994)
PICs in Stack
Emissions Actually
Detected
i
-------
1
^
E
1
"
8
1
10
>
•^
|
1
I
s
E
|
8
I
§
1
1
i"
n
*
1
.M
Vj
oo
Ij
£ 5
J^
V
1-
i £
5. S
SI
gi
o ?
f
1
3
•§
I
|
1.
•a
i
i
g
1
s
§
i
1
§.
I
1
i
i
a
i
n
1
„
1
|
1
Compounds Listed in
40 CFR Part 261
Appendix VH or VDJ
Cnemical-SpedBc
DataAvaOable
PICs Recommended
byU.S.EPA(1994c)
forAUHHRAs
U.S. EPA Compounds
Identified In
Combustion Unit
Emissions (1993)'
U.S. EPA
Recommended and
Potential PICs (1994)
PICs in Stack
Emissions Actually
Detected
S
I *
3
5
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l .
July 1998
APPENDIX A-l
COMPOUNDS OF POTENTIAL INTEREST
REFERENCES AND DISCUSSION
Tliis discussion lists reference documents for each of the columns in Table Al-1 and briefly describes the
quality of data associated with these references. The evaluation of chemical toxicity is also discussed at the
end of this section. This information is presented for informational purposes only.
A1.1 COLUMN!: CHEMICAL ABSTRACTS SERVICE (CAS) NUMBER
The CAS number is a unique number assigned to each compound in the table. Compounds are listed by
CAS number, in ascending order, to prevent problems with alphabetization procedures or differences in
common nomenclature. ,
A1.2 COLUMN 2: COMPOUND NAME
The most common compound name is listed. Where appropriate, common synonyms are also listed to aid
the user in identifying particular compounds.
A1.3 COLUMN 3: COMPOUNDS LISTED IN 40 CFR PART 261 APPENDIX VH OR Vm
Appendix VH of Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR) Part 261 identifies compounds for which
specific hazardous wastes, from specific and nonspecific sources, are listed (U.S. EPA 1995). Appendix
Vm of 40 CFR Part 261 identifies acute hazardous wastes and toxic hazardous wastes associated with
commercial chemical products, manufacturing chemical intermediates, and off-specification commercial
chemical products (U.S. EPA 1995). This column lists hazardous waste codes for the associated
compounds. This list is provided for reference purposes only, because it is commonly cited by other U.S.
EPA combustion risk assessment documents as an original source of the product of incomplete combustion
(PIC) lists. An explanation of the reasons for including a COPC on this list is beyond the scope of the
HHRAP.
A1.4 COLUMN 4: CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC DATA AVAILABLE
This column lists those compounds for which the following are available (as presented in Appendix A-3):
(1) chemical-specific physical and chemical information, and (2) chemical-specific fate-and-transport
information.
A1.5 COLUMN 5: PICS RECOMMENDED BY U.S. EPA (1994a) FOR ALL HUMAN
HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENTS (HHRA)
Compounds in this column marked with an "X" in the appropriate cells identified by U.S. EPA (1994a) as
PICs to be included in all HHRAs. U.S. EPA (1994a) does not describe the basis or references for the
inclusion of these PICs hi all HHRAs. More information regarding these compounds is presented in
Section 2.2 of the HHRAP.
U.S. EPA Regione
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S.EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-25
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
A1.6 COLUMN 6: PICS IDENTIFIED IN COMBUSTION UNIT EMISSIONS (U.S. EPA 1993)
Compounds in this column marked with an "X" in the appropriate cells ate identified in U.S. EPA (1993)
as PICs. The source documents for these tables cited by U.S. EPA (1993) are described in the following
subsections. These references have been cited by this and other U.S. EPA reference documents as
"sources" of information regarding PIC emissions from hazardous waste combustion units. This
document—U.S. EPA (1993)—has, in turn, been cited by later guidance documents as a "source" of
information regarding PIC emissions from hazardous waste combustion units. However, as is indicated by
the listing of the references from Dempsey and Oppelt (1993) (which is a summary of existing
information), many of the reference documents appear to simply cite additional "sources" of information.
The original research and sampling data regarding PIC emissions have not yet been identified but, based on
a preliminary review of the information below, the sources of the "original" information cited by all of Ihe
most common reference documents may be limited and may have been published over 15 years ago.
Al.6.1 Demsey and Oppelt (1993)
The sections of Demsey and Oppelt (1993) regarding PICs from hazardous waste combustion facilities
("Combustion Byproduct Emissions" and 'Table XVH: Organics that Could Potentially be Emitted from
Devices Burning Hazardous Waste") cite the following references:
• U.S. EPA (1989b) does not include a list of PICs from combustion sources. U.S. EPA
(1989b) discussed ways of ensuring that PIC emissions do not pose an unacceptable risk to
human health and the environment. Stack gas carbon monoxide (CO) concentration is a
good indicator of combustion efficiency; therefore, controlling CO is a prudent and
reasonable approach to minimizing the potential risk from PICs. The destruction and
removal efficiency (DRE) standard of 40 CFR Part 264242(a) limits stack emissions of
principal organic hazardous constituents (POHC) to 0.01 percent (or 0.0001 percent for
dioxin-containing waste) of the quantity of POHC hi the waste. This standard, however,
does not impose a limit on PICs. Therefore, a limit of 100 parts per million by volume
(ppmv) (Tier I) was imposed, below which PIC emissions do not pose unacceptable risks
to human health. The proposed rule allows a waiver to the 100-ppmv CO limit, by
(1) restricting total hydrocarbon (THC) emissions to 20 ppmv (Tier n), or (2) showing
that THC emissions do not pose an unacceptable health risk by using prescribed risk
assessment procedures.
The above limitations were also provided in the Federal Register, dated January 23,1981
(U.S. EPA 1981) and April 27,1990 (U.S. EPA 1990b)
• U.S. EPA (1981) does not contain any information regarding PICs not contained hi U.S.
EPA(1989b). There is no discussion of "risk" in this document Although the notice
deals with permitting standards, there is no risk-based approach, and it appears to be an
entirely technical discussion. Specifically, it deals with updated material for specific parts
of 40 CFR,
40 CFR Part 122 (Incinerator Facility Permits)
40 CFR Part 264 (General Standards for Hazardous Waste Incineration)
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-26
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
40 CFR Part 265 (Interim Status Standards for Hazardous Waste
Incineration)
Standards are technology-based, not risk-based.
• U.S. EPA (1990a) describes amendments to the hazardous waste incinerator regulations
for the following purpose:
Improve control of toxic metal emissions, HC1 emissions, and residual organic
emissions; amend the definitions of incinerators and industrial furnaces; propose
definitions for plasma arc incinerators and infrared incinerators; propose to
regulate carbon regeneration units as thermal treatment devices; and make a
number of minor revisions to permitting procedures.
U.S. EPA (1990a) also states the following:
The database on PIC emissions is limited therefore, the risk assessments may
under-estimate risk. The assessments consider only the organic compounds that
have been actually identified and quantified. Zero to 60 percent of total unburned
hydrocarbon emissions have been chemically identified at any particular facility.
Thus, the bulk of the hydrocarbon emissions have not been considered in those risk
assessments. Although many of the unidentified, unquantified organic compounds
may be non-toxic, some fraction of the organic emissions is undoubtedly toxic...
.data on typical PIC emissions from hazardous waste combustion sources were
compiled and assessed in recent EPA studies. These studies identified 37
individual compounds in the stack gas of the eight full-scale hazardous waste
incinerators tested, out of which 17 were volatile compounds and 20 semivolatile
compounds. Eight volatile compounds (benzene, toluene, chloroform,
trichloroethylene, carbon tetrachloride, tetrachloroethylene, chlorobenzene, and
methylene chloride), and one semivolatile compound (naphthalene) were identified
most frequently in more than 50 percent of the tests. Some of these compounds
are carcinogenic.
The sources for these statements appear to be Wallace and others (1986) and Trenholm
and Lee (1986).
Trenolm and Lee (1986), prepared by Andrew R. Trenholm of Midwest Research Institute
and C.C. Lee at the U.S. EPA Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory,
discussed that emissions from incinerators are only characterized for constituents listed in
Appendix Vm. However, constituents not listed in Appendix Vm are also emitted from
the stacks.
Data was obtained from HWERL-sponsored tests at eight hazardous waste incinerators,
nine boilers that co-fired hazardous wastes, and five mineral processing kilns that fired
hazardous wastes as fuel. In addition, SVOC emissions data for two municipal solid
waste incinerators and seven coal-fired power plants were also reviewed. The common
PICs are presented in the following table:
U.S. EPA Region 6 US EPA
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division Office of Solid Waste
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering A-l-27
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
July 1998
Volatile PICs Most Frequeatly &*s«ttt IB Stack Gases /,"'•'
VOCs
Benzene
Toluene
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chloroform
Methylene Chloride
Trichloroethylene
Tetrachloroethylene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Cfalorobenzene
SVOCs
Naphthalene
Phenol
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Diethylphthalate
Butylbenzylphthalate
Dibutylphathlate
Tests were conducted for three incinerator runs to search for constituents not listed in
Appendix VIH. These constituents include:
N»p-A|iimdixVraCoiMli^^ '""> >'
Acetone
Ethylbenzene
Acetophenone
Benzaldehyde
Benzenedicarboxaldehyde
Benzoic acid
Chlorocyclohexanol
Cyclohexane
Cyclohexanol
Cyclohexene
Dioctyl adipate
IStHenvl ethvlbenzene
Ethylbenzaldehyde
Ethylbenzoic acid
Ethylphenol
Ethylphenyl-ethanone
Ethynylbenzene
Phenylacetylene .
l,l'-(l,4-phenylene)bisethanone
Phenylpropenol
Propenylmethylbenzene
Tetramethyloxirane
Trimethylhexane
Emission rates of compounds not in the waste feed were also provided.
U.S. EPA (1985) does not include a list of PICs from combustion sources. U.S. EPA
(1985) discussed views and reviews by the Environmental Effects, Transport, and Fate
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-28
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
Committee of the Science Advisory Board of issues related to the environmental impacts of
the incineration of liquid hazardous wastes at sea and on land. Several issues were
addressed, including issues concerning the combustion and incineration of hazardous
waste. Major findings of the committee were as follows:
Fugitive emissions and spills may release as much or more material to the
environment than the direct emissions from waste incineration processes.
Numerous PICs are formed during combustion processes. However, only a -
fraction of them are identified or detected. It is possible that the aggregate of all
compound emissions that are not categorized as other POHCs or PICs can be
more toxic and pose greater risks than those listed. Although 99.99 percent DRE
has been claimed, if the unbumed or undetected hydrocarbon output is included,
the DRE may actually be less than 99.99 percent. Therefore, the concept of
destruction efficiency used by EPA was found to be incomplete and not useful for
subsequent exposure assessments. All emissions and effluents must be identified
and quantified, including their physical form and characteristics.
Local site-specific conditions must be used in characterizing exposure to receptors
from waste incinerator emissions.
The evaluation of exposure durations and concentrations should be based on a
detailed assessment of transport processes and the habits of the exposed
organisms. The role of food chains needs particular attention.
At a minimum, the toxicities of representative emissions and effluents from
incinerators should be tested on sensitive life stages of representative aquatic and
terrestrial vertebrates, invertebrates, and plants of ecological importance.
• U.S. EPA (1990b) does not include a list of PICs from combustion sources. It was
prepared by the PIC subcommittee of the Science Advisory Board to review the OSW
proposal to control emissions of PICs from hazardous waste incinerators by instituting
process controls that are based on CO and THC emission concentrations. U.S. EPA risk
assessments indicate that emissions of PICs at currently measured levels are not likely to
produce human effects. However, because the current DRE standard applies only to
designated POHCs, 99.99 percent DRE does not preclude the possibility that emission of
PICs could present significant human health risk. The following summarizes the major
findings of the subcommittee review.
The concept of using CO and THC as guidance for incinerator operational control
is reasonable.
At low CO levels, CO correlates well with THC; therefore, limiting CO in order to
ensure high combustion efficiency and low THC levels is reasonable. At high CO
concentrations, CO and THC do not correlate well; therefore, relying solely on the
controlling of CO may not provide a reasonable control for THC. Continuous
emissions monitoring of THC is preferred. Quantification of PICs alone is not
U.S. EPA Region 6 U S EPA
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division Office of Solid Waste
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering A-1-29
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l .
July 1998
practical with the sampling techniques that are available, primarily because PICs
are normally emitted in the range of parts per billion (ppb) to parts per trillion
(PPt).
A 100-ppmv limit for CO is reasonable. However, supporting documentation does
not demonstrate that a CO concentration of 100 ppmv is better than 50 ppmv or
150 ppmv.
Continuous emissions monitoring of THC with a cold system appears to be
practical for routine operations. However, a hot transfer line produces better
analysis of THC concentrations and detection of a larger fraction of the THCs
emitted.
The database characterizing PICs in emissions would not allow a correlation to be
established with CO or THC levels for various combustion devices and conditions.
Limited data introduces large uncertainties into U.S. EPA's risk assessment.
Therefore, U.S. EPA's site-specific risk assessment process is limited in its
usefulness in establishing acceptable THC levels. However, the risk assessment
procedures are risk-based.
U.S. EPA (1987) is a report prepared by Andrew R. Trenholm, Acurex Corporation,
California, and staff members from the U.S. EPA Hazardous Waste Engineering Research
Laboratory in Cincinnati, Ohio. The paper discussed the lack of information on total
emissions from combustion of hazardous wastes, particularly under conditions of less than
optimal performance. The focus issue was whether additional constituents that are listed
in Appendix Vm or not listed in Appendix VET which were not identified hi early tests
might be emitted from hazardous waste combustion units. To address this issue and
related issues, U.S. EPA initiated this project to qualitatively and quantitatively study the
characteristics of all possible effluents, under steady-state and transient conditions. The
following summarizes the major findings:
THC emissions detected as specific compounds ranged from 50 to 67 percent for
five runs and were 91 percent for one run. The fraction of THC not detected is
most likely explained by uncertainty in the measurements or other analytical
problems.
Methane accounted for the largest fraction of THC.
Oxygenated aliphatic compounds made up the largest class of compounds among
the SVOCs, both in total mass and number of compounds.
Transient upsets did not cause significant increases in the concentration of SVOCs
or most VOCs. Three VOCs that were increased were methane, methylene
chloride, and benzene.
Paniculate and HC1 emissions did not change between the steady-state and
transient test runs.
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-30
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
Duval and Rubey (1976) was prepared by D.S. Duval and W.A. Rubey of the University
of Dayton Research Institute, Ohio. The objective of the study was to provide data from
which requirements can be assigned for the thermal disposal of kepone. This report was
primarily concerned with the high-temperature destruction of kepone, with DDT and Mirex
used as comparative Analog. Laboratory tests were conducted to establish destruction
temperature characteristics of the vaporized pesticides at preselected residence times. The
following summarizes the major findings.
Kepone was essentially destroyed at a 1-second residence time and a temperature
range of 500°C to 700°C, depending on the pesticide.
Major decomposition products detected were hexachlorocyclopentadiene and
hexachlorobenzene for bolh kepone and Mirex. These products were formed in
different thermal regions.
The study demonstrated that the chemical nature of the effluent products depends
on the temperature and residence time that the basic molecule experiences.
Duval and Rubey (1977) discusses the experimental destruction temperature and residence
time relationships for various PCS compounds and mixtures of PCBs. The document
states that "upon thermal stressing in air, PCBs decomposes to low-molecular-weight
products." However, the document does not identify any of these low-molecular-weight
products. In feet, the document states directly that the products were not identified in the
study. It further recommends that additional research be conducted on the "degradation
products and effluents."
Dellinger, Torres, Rubey, Hall, and Graham (1984) was prepared by Barry Dellinger and
others of the University of Dayton, Ohio. This paper presented the gas-phase thermal
stability method under controlled laboratory conditions to rank the incinerabiliiy of
compounds. The objective of this study was to determine the gas-phase thermal
decomposition properties of 20 hazardous organic compounds.
The compounds were selected on the basis of (1) frequency of occurrence hi hazardous
waste samples, (2) apparent prevalence in stack effluents, and (3) representativeness of the
spectrum of hazardous waste organic waste materials. The following summarizes the
major findings.
Gas-phase thermal stability method is a more effective means of ranking the
incinerability of hazardous compounds in a waste.
Numerous PICs were formed during the thermal decomposition of most of the
compounds tested. However, PICs were not identified.
Destruction efficiency of 99.99 percent is achieved at 2 seconds mean residence
time in flowing air at 600°C to 950 °C.
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-31
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
No single physical or chemical property describes the ranking scheme for
incinerability.
Bellinger, Hall, Graham, Mazer, Rubey, and Malanchuk (1986) was prepared by Barry
Bellinger, B. Bouglas, L. Hall, John L. Graham, Sueann L. Mazer, and Wayne A. Rubey
of the University of Bayton Research Institute, Bayton, Ohio, and Myron Malanchuk of
U.S. EPA, Cincinnati, Ohio. The paper discussed the development of an incineration
model based on laboratory studies conducted by using the nonflame mode of hazardous
waste thermal decomposition. The results of these studies were compared to the
flame-mode studies and field tests to evaluate the incineration model proposed. The model
was based on the premise that incinerators do not operate continuously at optimum
conditions. As a result, 1 percent or more of the feed and its flame treatment products
must undergo further decomposition in the nonflame region to meet the BRE criterion of
greater than 99.99 percent.
In the past, several methods were used to rank the incinerability of compounds. Nonflame
studies, however, indicated that tests on compounds conducted at low oxygen
concentrations provided a better correlation with field tests to determine the relative
incinerability of compounds. Four experimental studies were conducted to develop and
expand the database on POHCs and PICs.
Studies were conducted on individual compounds to evaluate degradation compounds and
PICs from the original parent compound. The thermal degradation of 2,3',4,4',5-PCB was
studied under four reaction atmospheres (at varying levels of oxygen) at a constant gas
phase residence time of 2.0 seconds. Tests were conducted at temperatures ranging from
500°C to 1 ,000°C. Tests indicated that the yield of combustion products decreased with
increased oxygen levels. Numerous major degradation products were identified from the
thermal degradation of 2,3',4,4',5-PCB, including:
Penta-, tetra-, and trichlorodibenzofurans
Tetra- and trichlorobiphenyls
Tri- and dichlorobenzene
Tetra- and trichloronaphthalene
Tri- and dichlorochlorophenylethlyene
Tetrachlorobiphenylenes
C9H8OC1
C10H3C13
Thermal decomposition of chloroform was studied. Numerous decomposition products
were identified, including:
CC14
C2il4Cl2
C2HC13
C2C12
C2C14
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
u-s- EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-32
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
C3C14
C4C16
Thermal decomposition of polychlorinated phenols was studied in nitrogen (N2) and
oxygen atmospheres because of the potential formation of polychlorinated dibenzodioxins.
Pentachlorophenol (PCP) thermal decomposition was studied. Numerous decomposition
products of PCP were identified in N2 and/or air atmospheres, including:
Dichlorobutadiyne (in N2)
Tetrachloroethylene (in air)
Tetrachloropropyne (in air)
Trichlorofuran (in air)
Tetrachlorofuran (in air)
Trichlorobenzene (in N2 and air)
Tetrachlorobenzene (in N2 and ah-)
Pentachlorobenzene (in N2 and air)
Hexachlorobenzene (in N2)
Octachlorostyrene (in N2)
Hexachlorodihydronaphthalene (in N2 and air)
The paper concluded that PICs in the ah- atmosphere may have formed directly from the
parent material, whereas, in the nitrogen atmosphere, the principal PICs may have evolved
from the thermal decomposition of other PICs.
Kramlich, Seeker, and Heap (1984) does not include a list of PICs from combustion
sources. It was prepared by J.C. Kramlich, W.R. Seeker, and M.P. Heap of Energy and
Environmental Research Corporation, California; and C.C. Lee of the Industrial Waste
Combustion Group, U.S. EPA. This paper presented a research program to study the
flame-mode incineration of hazardous waste liquids in laboratory scale reactors. The
objective of this study was to supply the flame-mode data that will be used in evaluating
the applicability of various approaches to ranking the ease of incinerability.
Five compounds were tested— chloroform, 1,1-dichloroethane, benzene, acrylonitrile, and
chlorobenzene — because (1) their range of incinerabilities is broad, and (2) they are
representative of liquid hazardous wastes. The following summarizes the findings.
The flame section of the incinerator destroys greater than 99.995 percent of the
wastes.
The post-flame region destroys the remainder of the wastes.
The destruction efficiency is reduced because of flame-related failures.
Incinerability ranking depends on actual failure condition.
No incinerability ranking system completely predicts the destruction efficiency of
the compounds tested for all failure conditions.
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U g
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-33
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
Trenholm and Hathaway (1984) was prepared by Andrew Trenholm and Roger Hathaway
of Midwest Research Institute (MRI) in Missouri, and Don Oberacker, U.S. EPA,
Cincinnati, Ohio. PICs were defined as any Appendix Vm hazardous organic constituent
detected hi the stack gas but not present hi the waste feed at a concentration of 100
micrograms per gram or higher. Benzene and chloroform were the most commonly found
PICs. PIC emissions were comparable to POHC emissions in concentration and total mass
output This document discussed PIC formation mechanisms and criteria for PIC
formations.
MRI conducted a series of tests at eight operating hazardous waste incineration facilities
and analyzed the collected samples for PICs. These tests were conducted as part of the
technical support of U.S. EPA's preparation of a regulatory impact analysis for hazardous
waste incinerators. Each incinerator had a liquid injection burner, and some facilities also
included a rotary kiln or hearth. Three incinerators had no air pollution control devices.
The remaining five had wet scrubbers for HC1 control, and four of these had other
particulate control devices. Twenty-nine compounds were classified as PICs from the
eight incinerator tests and are presented hi Table Al.6-1. In general, PIC concentrations
were slightly higher than POHC concentrations, although this ratio varied from site to site.
PIC output rate very rarely exceeded 0.01 percent of the POHC input rate. The document
stated that the measurement of Appendix VIII compounds at low concentrations in the
waste feed, auxiliary fuel, and inflow streams to control systems is often necessary to
explain the presence of PICs.
Olexsey, Huffman, and Evans (1985) was prepared by Robert A. Olexsey and others of
the U.S. EPA Hazardous Waste Engineering Research Laboratory in Cincinnati, Ohio.
This document discussed PIC generation mechanisms and criteria for PIC formations. The
paper provided data on emissions of PICs during full-scale tests conducted on incinerators
and boilers burning hazardous waste (Trenholm and others 1984; Castaldini and others
1984). The documents referenced by this paper summarized a series of full-scale tests
conducted on seven incinerators and five boilers conducted by U.S. EPA to support its
regulatory development for incinerators and boilers. Commonly found PICs identified hi
these tests are presented hi Tables Al.6-2 and Al.6-3.
For incinerators, ratios of PIC emissions to POHC input ranged from 0.00007 to
0.0028 percent; and ratios of PIC emissions to POHC emissions ranged from 0.01 to 3.89.
For boilers, ratios of PIC emissions to POHC input ranged from 0.0032 to 0.3987 percent,
and ratios of PIC emissions to POHC emissions ranged from 5.44 to 22.5. These data
indicated that PIC emissions were higher for boilers than for incinerators; that is, PIC
emissions were reduced with increased POHC DRE which is higher for incinerators. The
document proposed seven methods to control PICs and recommended further research on
PIC generation mechanisms and control technologies.
Trenholm, Kapella, and Hinshaw (1992) was prepared by Andrew R. Trenholm and David
W. Kapella of MRI hi North Carolina and Gary D. Hinshaw of MRI hi Missouri. The
paper discusses the following issues regarding emissions from incinerators that burn
hazardous waste: (1) emissions of specific constituents presented hi Appendix Vin,
(2) emissions of specific compounds or types of compounds, and (3) data on the size and
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-34
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
molecular weight of compounds emitted. The following were among the major issues
discussed.
PICs were studied through U.S. EPA-sponsored tests at eight incinerators, nine
industrial boilers, and five mineral processing kilns. The study was limited to
compounds presented in Appendix Vm. In all, 52 organic compounds (32 VOCs
and 20 S VOCs) were identified. The VOC concentrations were significantly
higher than the SVOC concentrations. PICs listed in this paper included benzene,
toluene, carbon tetrachloride, trichloromethane, dichloromethane, trichloroethene,
tetrachloroethene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, cholorobenzene, naphthalene, and phenol.
TABLE Al.6-1
PICS IDENTIFIED BY TRENHOLM AND HATHAWAY (1984)
Benzene
Chloroform
Bromodichloromethane
Dibromochloromethane
Naphthalene
Bromoform
Chlorobenzene
Tetrachloroethylene
1,1,1,-Trichloroethane
Toluene
o-Nitrophenol
Methylene chloride
Phenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Carbon disulfide
o-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Methylene bromide
Bromochloromethane
Trichlorobenzene
Hexachlorobenzene
iS}MSi^$Mf;
6
5
4
'4
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
12
1
3
1
5 .
0.2
1
0.1
0.1
2
2
2
4
110
32
22
21
18
14
7
7
'*Tiitfiaf Ofl^cciiti^fi.ttii'tii^'JjJ"' v
670
1,330
32
12
100
24
10
2.5
1.5
75
50
27
22
110
32
22
21
18
14
7
7
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S.EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-35
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
PICs Found In Stack Effluents " „ !
Diethyl phthalate
Pentachlorophenol
Dichlorobenzene
Chloromethane
Methyl ethyl ketone
Bromomethane
Pyrene
Fluoranthene
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7
6
4
3
3
1
1
1
7
6
4
3
3
1
1
1
Notes:
ng/L
PIC
Nanograms per liter
Product of incomplete combustion
TABLE Al.6-2
VOLATILE PICS MOST FREQUENTLY IDENTIFIED IN BOILER EMISSIONS
(OLEXSY, HUFFMAN, AND EVANS 1985)
•"':. „ ' wc
Chloroform
Tetrachloroethylene
Chloromethane
Meihylene chloride
Benzene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
Number of Facilities
5
5
4
4
3
3
3
Low Concentration
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l ;
July 1998
TABLE Al.6-3
VOLATILE PICS MOST FREQUENTLY IDENTIFIED IN INCINERATOR EMISSIONS
(OLEXSY, HUFFMAN, AND EVANS 1985)
Benzene
12
670
Chloroform
1,330
Tetrachloroethylene
0.1
2.5
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
0.1
1.5
Toluene
75
Methylene chloride
27
Notes:
ng/L = Nanograms per liter
PIC = Product of incomplete combustion
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-37
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
From the U.S. EPA-sponsored tests, (1) volatile compounds listed in Appendix
VEH identified were only a fraction—sometimes about one-half—of the total
organic compounds identified, and (2) semivolatile compounds not listed in
Appendix VHI identified were three to 30 times the quantity of organic compounds
listed in Appendix VIH. Table Al.6-4 lists the compounds identified by the U.S.
EPA-sponsored tests.
A study of hazardous waste incinerator stack effluent was conducted to
characterize the types of compounds emitted. Twenty-nine compounds were
identified at a concentration range of 0.1 to 980 nanograms per liter. Methane,
chloromethane, and chloroform accounted for more than one-half of the total mass
of VOCs detected. Other than methane, oxygenated aliphatic hydrocarbons
formed the highest fraction of the total emissions.
Based on the incinerator stack effluent study, it was found that as combustion
conditions deteriorate, increases in mass emissions are first noted with VOCs.
Emissions of these compounds, most notably Cl to C3 compounds, increase
proportionately more than larger compounds. For larger compounds, available
data indicate that emission increases are more likely to be aromatic compounds.
Al.6.3 CARB(1990b)
GARB prepared "Technical Support Document of Proposed Dioxins Control Measures for Medical Waste
Incinerators" to meet the requirements of California Health and Safety Code Section 39666 that a needs
report be prepared for proposed rules. The report presents a proposed airborne toxic control measure for
dioxin emissions from medical waste-burning facilities. The report concentrates on dioxin, furan, and
cadmium emissions, although other pollutants detected during the tests are listed. Table Al.6-5 lists these
pollutants.
Al.6.4 CARS (1991)
GARB prepared "Air Pollution Control at Resource Recovery Facilities 1991 Update" to update
information presented in its 1984 report, entitled "Air Pollution Control at Resource Recovery Facilities."
Specifically, the document updates available guidelines concerning incinerator technology, emissions
control technology, and emission limits for municipal waste, hospital waste, biomass, tire, manure, landfill
and digester gas, and sewer sludge incinerators. The document states that its guidelines represent levels
that have been achieved by existing facilities.
In addition, the document summarizes the ultimate analysis of waste types undergoing treatment in the
facilities described above. An appendix summarizes stack gas analysis data for numerous operating
facilities. Pollutants identified in the analyses are summarized in Table Al.6-6.
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-38
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
TABLE Al.6-4
MOST FREQUENTLY IDENTIFIED PICS
(TRENHOLM, KAPELLA, AND HINSHAW 1992)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
Methylene chloride
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
Trichloroethylene
Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Butylbenzylphthalate
Dibutylphtahlate
Diethylphthalate
Naphthalene
Phenol
l,r-(l,4-Phenylene)bisethanone
Acetone
Acetophenone
Benzaldehyde
Benzenedicarboxaldehyde
Benzole acid
Cyclohexanol
Chlorocyclohexanol
Cyclohexane
Ethylbenzene
Ethylbenzoic acid
Ethylphenol
Ethylphenyl-ethanone
Ethynylbenzene
Phenylpropenol
Propenylmethylbenzene
Tetramethyloxirane
Trimethvlhexfliip
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S.EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-39
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
TABLE Al.6-5
COPCS IDENTIFIED BY CARS (1990b)
XXMPC
Ammonia
Arsenic
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Cadmium
Carbon dioxide
Carbon monoxide
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzenes
Chlorodibromomethane
Chloroform
Chlorophenols
Chromium, hexavalent
Chromium, total
Copper
Cumene
1,2-Dibromoethane
Dichloroethane
Dichloromethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
Ethylbenzene
Freon
Hydrocarbon, total
Hydrogen chloride
Hydrogen fluoride
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Mesitylene
Methyl isobutyl ketone
Napthalene
Nickel
Nitrogen oxides
PM
PAHs
Sulfur dioxide
Tetrachloroethene
Tetratrichloromethylene
Toluene
Tribromomethane
Trichlorethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Trichlorotrifluroethane
Vinyl chloride
Xylenes
Zinc
Notes:
PAH = Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons
PM = Particulate matter
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-40
-------
Human Healtik Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
TABLE Al.6-6
STACK GAS ANALYSIS DATA
(CARE 1991)
(Page 1 of 2)
< AA ° 4 O ..- *.
•
•
•
NA
NA
•
•
•
NA
•
•
NA
•
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND
NA
NA
•
•
•
•
====±:
^*>
* ^ ^ A
v " Bioniass ^
' W",
•
ND
•
•
•
NA
NA
•
•
•
•
NA
•
•
NA
NA
NA
•
•
•
NA
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
=====
5'*"^^^
^ ftfoiiW*4L "
•WHiMBiW
*° <*r'
•
•
•
•
•
NA
NA
NA
•
•
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
=====
i'l^Jtk" y
' *IJSt?
',«&'
•
•
•
•
•
•
NA
•
•
•
•
•
ND
•
•
NA
ND
NA
NA
ND
ND
NA
•
•
•
•
NA
•
•
•
f • *-> t „.*
x>>\ ' ^'
~ *^y <
E
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
TABLE Al.6-6
STACK GAS ANALYSIS DATA
(GARB 1991)
(Page 2 of 2)
Notes:
ND
NA
= Detected in at least one emission test
« Not detected in any emission test
=•= No analysis
Number in parentheses indicates the number of fecilities for which data were tabulated.
Isomers and/or homologues that were not detected were added to total values at one-half the detection limit;
pollutant may not have actually been detected.
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center far Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-42
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
Al.6.5 U.S. EPA (1988)
This document, referenced by some documents as a 1989 document, was prepared in 1988.
U.S. EPA prepared "Hospital Waste Combustion Study: Data Gathering Phase" to assemble available
information on hospital waste combustion so that U.S. EPA can evaluate whether airborne pollutant
emissions from hospital waste combustion should be regulated. While preparing this document, U.S. EPA
reviewed the pertinent literature to determine which studies would be helpful in completing the database on
toxic emissions from medical waste incinerators. The report clearly addresses only those pollutants for
which emissions data were found. The data reviewed were mostly for larger, controlled air incinerators;
and the more commonly used retort incinerators were not evaluated.
The study identified several categories of pollutants that were measured in stack gases; these are discussed
in the following paragraphs.
Where evaluated, acid gases were detected in stack gases. For example, HC1 was detected in 24 of 28
tests; HC1 concentration not recorded hi the remaining four tests.
Particulate matter (PM) was detected in all stack tests for 30 facilities at concentrations ranging from
0.001 grains per dry standard cubic foot (gr/dscf), at a facility with PM add-on control devices, to
0.22 gr/dscf at facilities without such control devices.
Trace metals were detected in stack tests for three medical waste incineration facilities. Metals detected
include arsenic, cadmium, chromium, iron, manganese, nickel, and lead. The document also states that
fine-particle enrichment processes could lead to emissions of molybdenum, tin, selenium, vanadium, and
zinc. However, test results for these trace metals are not presented.
With respect to organic emissions, dioxins and furans were detected in emissions from three facilities, both
with and without pollution control devices. Other organic emissions detected in stack tests cited in this
report include CO, THC, trichlorotrifluoroethane, tetrachloromethane, tetrachloroethene, and
trichloroethylene.
In a stack testing conducted on three Canadian biomedical waste incinerators, PCBs and PAHs were either
not detected (one facility) or not analyzed (two facilities).
Al.6.6 CARS (1996)
In May 1996, CARB prepared "Proposed Amendments to the Emission Inventory Criteria and Guidelines
Report Published in Accordance with the Air Toxics 'Hot Spots' Information and Assessment Act of
1987." The purpose of the report is to present the basis of CARB's recommended amendments to the Air
Toxics Hot Spots Program. The report states that California Health and Safety Code (HSC) 44321
requires CARB to compile the list of toxic substances that must be monitored from "designated reference
lists of substances." Therefore, the document is not a primary source of toxics emission information. The
primary sources of information are mandated by California HSC 44321, as follows:
California HSC 44321(a): National Toxicology Program, International Agency for
Research on Cancer
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-43
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
California HSC44321(b): Governor's List of Carcinogens and Reproductive Toxicants
California HSC44321(c): CARB
California HSC44321(d): Hazard Evaluation System and Information Service
California HSC44321(e): U.S. EPA
California HSC44321(f): California HSC
The lists of toxic substances presented in the document are not restricted to incinerator facilities, but apply
to any fecility discharging airborne pollutants to the atmosphere. The document also removes numerous
substances, primarily medicinal compounds, from lists of toxic chemicals that must always be evaluated,
and places them on lists of toxic compounds that require evaluation only if a fecility manufactures that
substance.
A1.7 COLUMN 7: U.S. EPA-RECOMMENDED AND POTENTIAL PICS (1994a; 1994b)
Compounds marked with an "X" in the appropriate cells are identified in U.S. EPA (1994a and 1994b).
Based on information presented in U.S. EPA (1994b), these tables were developed from available U.S.
EPA data and from lists of toxic compounds from various U.S. EPA programs. Because the source lists
were not developed as lists of toxic PICs, U.S. EPA deleted compounds that were not appropriate (U.S.
EPA 1994b). U.S. EPA acknowledged the importance of using focused studies to develop a PIC list that is
(1) appropriately protective of the environment, and (2) not excessively burdensome on the regulated
community. Nevertheless, Tables 1 and 2 in U.S. EPA (1994b) were compiled as draft lists for use during
the interim period. Tables in U.S. EPA (1994b) were to be revised as additional PIC data were collected.
U.S. EPA Permits and State Program Division is currently updating these tables; however, a target
completion date is not available. Tables 1 and 2 are based on the following (U.S. EPA 1994b):
. . Hazardous waste constituent list hi 40 CFR Part 261, Appendix Vm
• hazardous air pollutants (HAP) list
• Office of Research and Development list of organic compounds found in combustion
devices developed for U.S. EPA (1993)
The following compounds were deleted from this list:
• Pesticide compounds not likely to be a PIC
• Federal Drug Administration-regulated drugs
• Carcinogenic sugar substitutes
• Compounds without chemical-specific listings (for example, "coal tar")
• Compounds without U.S. EPA-established sampling and analysis methods
Mdt^iaPto^ig and Permitting Division Office of Solid Waste
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering A~l
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
• Metallic compounds (because of difficulty in analyzing the specific compounds; metals are
still included in elemental totals)
• Compounds with low octanol-water partition coefficients and no inhalation toxicity data
• Compounds with low toxicity values
• Naturally-occurring plant toxins
Specific compounds were retained on Tables 1 and 2 on the following basis:
• Pesticides with a molecular structure simple enough to be of concern as a PIC
• Compounds with very high octanol-water partition coefficients
A1.8 COLUMN 8: PICS ACTUALLY DETECTED IN STACK EMISSIONS
Compounds marked by an "X" in the appropriate cells are PICs that have actually been detected in stack
emissions. U.S. EPA compiled this list by evaluating the studies highlighted in Section A1.6.
A1.9 EXAMPLE OF COPC SELECTION PROCESS
As discussed in Chapter 2, seven steps should be followed to identify the COPCs that will be evaluated for
each fecility. For four of these steps, a sample table—based on data from an existing fecility—-has been
included in this section as an example to illustrate the completion of each step.
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-45
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l .
July 1998
TABLE Al.9-1
STEP 1: IDENTIFY CONCENTRATION DETECTED OR NONDETECT STATUS OF
EACH COMPOUND
CAS Number
50-32-8
51-28-5
53-70-3
56-23-5
56-55-3
59-50-7
67-64-1
67-66-3
67-72-1
71-43-2
71-55-6
74-83-9
74-87-3
75-00-3
75-01-4
75-09-2
75-15-0
75-25-2
Compound
Total Tetrachlorodibenzofuran
Total Pentachlorodibenzofuran
Total Hexachlorodibenzofuran
Total Heptachlorodibenzofuran
2-Methylphenol
Benzo(a)pyrene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzo(a)anthracene
4-Chloro-3-methlyphenol
Acetone
Chlorofonn
Hexachloroethane
Benzene
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
Bromomethane
Chloromethane
Chloroethane
Vinyl Chloride
Methylene Chloride
Carbon disulfide
Bromofonn
Concentration (g/s)
1.34E-10
4.71E-11
2.25E-11
8.33E-11
<3.16E-7
<5.20E-8
<1.10E-6
<5.84E-8
<2.53E-7
<5.40E-8
<3.74E-7
3.79E-7
1.58E-5
<4.06E-7
2.97E-5
6.10E-7
<4.19E-7
<4.11E-7
<5.76E-7
<3.67E-7
5.15E-5
<3.67E-7
<3.14E-7
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-46
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
TABLE Al.9-1
STEP 1: roENTIFY CONCENTRATION DETECTED OR NONDETECT STATUS OF
EACH COMPOUND
?CAS lumber
75-27-4
75-27-4
75-34-3
75-69-4
77-47-4
78-03-3
78-59-1
78-87-5
79-00-5
79-00-5
79-34-5
83-32-9
84-66-1
84-74-2
85-01-8
85-68-7
86-30-6
86-73-7
87-68-3
87-86-5
88-06-2
88-74-4
88-75-5
« Compound ,
BromodicWoromethane
Dibromochloromethane
1 , 1 -Dichloroethane
Trichloroflouromethane
Hexachlorocyclopentadine
2-Butanone
Isophorone
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
Trichloroehtene
1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane
1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Acenaphthene
Diethylphthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Phenanthrene
Butylben2ylphthalate
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Flourene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Pentochlorophenol
2,4,6 -TricMorophenol
2-Nitroaniline
2-Nitrophenol
Concentration (g/s)
<7.03E-7
<1.83E-7
<1.57E-7
4.33E-7
<3.11E-7
<4.50E-6
<1.49E-7
<2.36E-7
2.62E-7
/ <2.61E-7
<2.61E-7
<1.34E-7
7.10E-7
1.22E-6
<8.32E-8
<8.75E-8
<2.00E-7
<1.10E-7
<3.70E-6
<3.94E-7
<3.42E-7
<4.66E-7
<4.26E-7
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-47
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l -
July 1998
TABLE Al.9-1
STEP 1: IDENTIFY CONCENTRATION DETECTED OR NONDETECT STATUS OF
EACH COMPOUND
:"::?: CAS Number
91-20-3
91-57-6
91-58-7
91-94-1
95-5-1
95-47-6
95-47-6
95-57-8
95-95-4
98-95-3
99-09-2
100-01-6
100-02-7
100-41-4
100-42-5
100-51-6
101-55-3
105-67-9
106-42-3
106-45-7
106-47-8
107-06-2
108-05-4
Compound "^ , „
Napthalene
2-Methylnapthalene
2-Chloronapthalene
3,3-Dichlorobenzidine
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
o-xylene
Chromium
2-Chlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
Nitrobenzene
3-Nitroaniline
4-Nitroaniline
4-Nitrophenol
Ethylbenzene
Styiene
Benzyl Alcohol
4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
2,4-Dimethylphenol
m-p-Xylene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
4-Chloroaniline
1,2-Dichloroethane
Vinyl Acetate
CoiscentratioB ^g/s) ' >^
1.18E-6
<1.36E-7
<1.07E-7
<1.40E-7
<2.23E-7
<1.57E-7
4.68E-4
<2.50E-7
<3.29E-7
<2.69E-7
<4.07E-7
<3.56E-7
<6.90-7
<1.83E-7
<1.31E-7
3.16E-7
<3.99E-7
<2.97E-7
<1.58E-7
<2.05E-7
<2.08E-7
<1.00E-6
<1.74E-7
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-48
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
TABLE Al.9-1
STEP 1: ffiENTIFY CONCENTRATION DETECTED OR NONDETECT STATUS OF
EACH COMPOUND
108-10-1
108-39-4
108-60-1
108-88-3
108-90-7
108-95-2
111-44-4
111-91-1
117-81-7
117-84-0
118-74-1
120-12-7
120-82-1
120-83-2
121-14-2
121-30-6
127-18-4
129-00-0
131-11-3
132-64-9
156-59-2
191-24-2
192-97-2
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
3-Methylphenol
2,2 Oxybis (1-Chloropropane)
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Phenol
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Di-n-octylphthalate
Hexachlorobenzene
anthracene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
4,6-Dinitro-2-methyphenol
Tetrachloroethene
Pyrene
Dimethylphthalate
Dibenzofiiran
Cis-l,2-Dichloroethene
Benzo(g4i,i)peiylene
Benzo(e)pyrene
<*.45E-7
<3.26E-7
<3.0E-7
2.32E-6
6.97E-7
4.39E-7
<3.19E-7
<2.62E-7
<3.57E-6
<3.51E-8
<2.76E-7
<9.13E-8
<4.21E-7
<3.11E-7
<3.28E-7
<5.92E-7
<2.09E-7
<5.57E-8
<1.13E-7
<8.09E-7
<2.36E-7
<4.75E-8
<5.06E-8
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-49
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
TABLE Al.9-1
STEP 1: IDENTIFY CONCENTRATION DETECTED OR NONDETECT STATUS OF
EACH COMPOUND
CAS Number
193-39-5
198-55-0
205-99-2
206-44-0
207-08-9
208-96-8
218-00-0
540-59-0
540-59-2
541-73-1
542-75-6
542-75-6
591-78-6
606-20-2
621-64-7
1090-42-5
1746-01-6
3268-87-9
7005-72-3
10408-74-3
35822-46-9
39001-02-0
39227-85-7
Compound j
Ihdeno(l ,2,3-cd)pyrene
Perylene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Fluoranthene
Benzo(k)flouranthene
Acenapthylene
Chrysene
Trans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethene
1 ,2-Dichloroethene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
trans- 1 ,3-Dichloropropene
cis- 1 ,3-Dichloropropene
2-Hexanone
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
Nickel
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin
Octachlorodibenzodioxin
4-Chlorophenyl-phenylelher
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzodioxin
Total Heptachlorodibenzodioxin
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin
Concentration (g/s)
<4.47E-8
<5.57E-8
<5.03E-8
<6.11E-8
<5.03E-8
<7.52E-8
<5.76E-8
<2.62E-7
<3.16E-7
<2.06E-7
<2.10E-7
<1.57E-7
<8.64E-7
<4.63E-7
<4.62E-7
4.00E-5
<1.39E-12
1.23E-12
<2.26E-7
<1.39E-12
5.99E-12
7.82E-12
<2.70E-12
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-50
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
TABLE Al.9-1
STEP 1: ffiENTIFY CONCENTRATION DETECTED OR NONDETECT STATUS OF
EACH COMPOUND
CAS Number
55673-89-7
57117-41-6
57117-41-6
57117-44-9
57117-44-9
57653-85-7
60851-34-5
70648-26-9
70648-26-9
72918-21-9
7857-2-39-4
109719-77-9
109719-77-9
109719-77-9
125322-32-9
5 Compound - '-''->„,
Total Hexachlorodibenzodioxin
2,3 ,4,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzoftiran
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-Heptachlorodibenzofuran
i,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
1,2,3,6, 7,8-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin
Octachlorodibenzofuran
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptachlorodibenzofUran
Total Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin
Total Pentachlprodibenzodioxin
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran '
2,3,4,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzodioxin
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenxodioxin
Concentration's) <•
2.77E-12
5.54E-12
<2.77E-12
<2.70E-12
<1.39E-12 ""
<1.39E-12
8.56E-12
8.33E-12
1.04E-11
2.77E-12
<1.39E-12
2.77E-12
5.62E-12
<2.70E-12
1.94E-11
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-51
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
TABLE A1.9-2A
STEP 2A: IDENTIFY COMPOUNDS PRESENT IN THE WASTE FEED
CAS Number
50-32-8
51-28-5
53-70-3
56-23-5
56-55-3
59-50-7
67-64-1
67-66-3
67-72-1
71-43-2
71-55-6
74-83-9
74-87-3
75-00-3
75-01-4
75-09-2
75-15-0
Compound
Total Tetrachlorodibenzofuran
Total Pentachlorodibenzofuran
Total Hexachlorodibenzofuran
Total Heptachlorodibenzofuran
2-Methylphenol
Benzo(a)pyrene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
Dibenzo(aji)anthracene
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzo(a)anthracene
4-Chloro-3-methlyphenol
Acetone
Chloroform
Hexachloroethane
Benzene
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
Bromomethane
Chloromethane
Chloroethane
Vinyl Chloride
Methylene Chloride
Carbon disulfide
1 Concentration (g/s) >f
L34E-10
4.71E-11
2.25E-11
8.33E-11
<3.16E-7
<5.20E-8
<1.10E-6
<5.84E-8
<2.53E-7
<5.40E-8
<3.74E-7
3.79E-7
1.58E-5
<4.06E-7
2.97E-5
6.10E-7
<4.19E-7
<4.11E-7
<5.76E-7
<3.67E-7
5.15E-5
<3.67E-7
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-52
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
TABLE A1.9-2A
STEP 2A: IDENTIFY COMPOUNDS PRESENT IN THE WASTE FEED
75-25-2
75-27-4
75-27-4
75-34-3
75-69-4
77-47-4
78-03-3
78-59-1
78-87-5
79-00-5
79-00-5
79-34-5
83-32-9
84-66-1 -
84-74-2
85-01-8
85-68-7
86-30-6
86-73-7
87-68-3
87-86-5
88-06-2
Bromoform
Bromodichloromethane
Dibromochloromethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
Trichloroflonromethane
Hexachlorocyclopentadine
2-Butanone
Isophorone
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
Trichloroehtene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
>
Acenaphthene
Diethylphthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Phenanthrene
Butylbenzylphthalate
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
Flourene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Pentochlorophenol
2,4,6 -Trichlorophenol
<3.14E-7
<7.03E-7
<1.83E-7
<1.57E-7
4.33E-7
<3.11E-7
<4.50E-6
<1.49E-7
<2.36E-7
2.62E-7
<2.61E-7
<2.61E-7
<1.34E-7
7.10E-7
1.22E-6
<8.32E-8
<8.75E-8
<2.00E-7
<1.10E-7
, <3.70E-6
<3.94E-7
<3.42E-7
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-53
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
TABLE A1.9-2A
STEP 2A: IDENTIFY COMPOUNDS PRESENT IN THE WASTE FEED
CAS Number
88-74-4
88-75-5
91-20-3
91-57-6
91-58-7
91-94-1
95-5-1
95-47-6
95-47-6
95-57-8
95-95-4
98-95-3
99-09-2
100-01-6
100-02-7
100-41-4
100-42-5
100-51-6
101-55-3
105-67-9
106-42-3
106-45-7
Compound
2-Nitroaniline
2-Nitrophenol
Napthalene
2-Methylnapthalene
2-Chloronapthalene
3,3-Dichlorobenzidine
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
o-xylene
Chromium
2-Chlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
Nitrobenzene
3-Nitroaniline
4-Nitroaniline
4-Nitrophenol
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Benzyl Alcohol
4-Bromophenyl-phenylether
2,4-Dimethylphenol
m-p-Xylene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Concentration (g/s)
<4.66E-7
<4.26E-7
1.18E-6
<1.36E-7
<1.07E-7
<1.40E-7
<2.23E-7
<1.57E-7
4.68E-4
<2.50E-7
<3.29E-7
<2.69E-7
<4.07E-7
<3.56E-7
<6.90-7
<1.83E-7.
<1.31E-7
3.16E-7
<3.99E-7
<2.97E-7
<1.58E-7
<2.05E-7
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-54
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
TABLE A1.9-2A
STEP 2A: IDENTIFY COMPOUNDS PRESENT IN THE WASTE FEED
CAS Number,
106-47-8
107-06-2
108-05-4
108-10-1
108-39-4
108-60-1
108-88-3
108-90-7
108-95-2
111-44-4
111-91-1
117-81-7
117-84-0
118-74-1
120-12-7
120-82-1
120-83-2
121-14-2
121-30-6
127-18-4
129-00-0
131-11-3
- Compound
4-Chloroaniline
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
Vinyl Acetate
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
3-Methylphenol
2,2 Oxybis (1-Chloropropane)
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Phenol
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Di-n-octylphthalate
Hexachlorobenzene
anthracene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
4,6-Dinitro-2-methyphenol
Tetrachloroethene
Pyrene
Dimethylphthalate
Concentration (g/s) ;
<2.08E-7
<1.00E-6
<1.74E-7
<4.45E-7
<3.26E-7
<3.0E-7
2.32E-6
6.97E-7
4.39E-7
<3.19E-7
<2.62E-7
<3.57E-6
<3.51E-8
<2.76E-7
<9.13E-8
<4.21E-7
<3.11E-7
<3.28E-7
<5.92E-7
<2.09E-7
<5.57E-8
<1.13E-7
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-55
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
TABLE A1.9-2A
STEP 2A: IDENTIFY COMPOUNDS PRESENT IN THE WASTE FEED
CAS Number
132-64-9
156-59-2
191-24-2
192-97-2
193-39-5
198-55-0
205-99-2
206-44-0
207-08-9
208-96-8
218-00-0
540-59-0
540-59-2
541-73-1
542-75-6
542-75-6
591-78-6
606-20-2
621-64-7
1090-42-5
1746-01-6
3268-87-9
i' ;;" ConviHaid . '., , V , . :
Dibenzofuran
Cis-l,2-Dichloroethene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(e)pyrene
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
Perylene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Fluoranthene
Benzo(k)flouranthene
Acenapthylene
Chrysene
Trans-l,2-Dichloroethene
1,2-Dichloroethene
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
trans- 1 ,3-Dichloropropene
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
2-Hexanone
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
Nickel
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin
Octacblorodibenzodioxin
Mgjfl&NHftftipiMii w*/ 1 ,
<8.09E-7
<2.36E-7
<4.75E-8
<5.06E-8
<4.47E-8
<5.57E-8
<5.03E-8
<6.11E-8
<5.03E-8
<7.52E-8
<5.76E-8
<2.62E-7
<3.16E-7
<2.06E-7
<2.10E-7
<1.57E-7
<8.64E-7
<4.63E-7
<4.62E-7
4.00E-5
<1.39E-12
1.23E-12
U.S. EPA Re^on6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-56
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l .
July 1998
TABLE A1.9-2A
STEP 2A: IDENTIFY COMPOUNDS PRESENT IN THE WASTE FEED
7005-72-3
10408-74-3
35822-46-9
39001-02-0
39227-85-7
55673-89-7
57117-41-6
57117-41-6
57117-44-9
57117-44-9
57653-85-7
60851-34-5
70648-26-9
70648-26-9
72918-21-9
7857-2-39-4
109719-77-9
109719-77-9
109719-77-9
125322-32-9
4-Chlorophenyl-plienylether
1 ,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzodioxin
Total Heptachlorodibenzodioxin
1 £,3>4,7,8-HexacUorodibenzodioxin
Total Hexachlorodibenzodioxin
2,3,4,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
l,2,3,4,7,8,9-HeptacMorodiben2ofuran
l,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodiben2»fiiran
lA3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin
Octachlorodibenzofuran
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexaclilorodibenzofuran
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzofuran
Total Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin
Total Pentachlorodibenzodioxin
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofiiran
2,3,4,6,7,8-HexachlorodibenzofUran
1 ,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzodioxin
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenxodioxin
<2.26E-7
<1.39E-12
5.99E-12
7.82E-12
<2.70E-12
2.77E-12
5.54E-12
<2.77E-12
<2.70E-12
<1.39E-12
<1.39E-12
8.56E-12
8.33E-12
1.04E-11
2.77E-12
<1.39E-12
2.77E-12
5.62E-12
<2.70E-12
1.94E-11
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-57
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l ,
July 1998
TABLE A-1.9-2B
STEP2B: LIST COMPONENTS IN WASTE FEED
H^^^^Hj^Hg^HF|mHHMWll|flfflH||fB
l^^^^^n^^H^HHnHSNUliUBWBi
^B^HH^^IBiii^BBBHfi^HlilHIiiB
64-17-5
65-53-3
67-5-1
67-63-0
71-36-8
74-89-5
75-04-7
78-83-3
78-96-6
107-10-8
108-94-1
109-02-4
109-89-7
109-99-9
110-89-4
110-91-8
111-29-5
111-46-6
111-87-5
137-32-6
814-78-8
1484-89-6
Ethanol
Aniline
Methanol
Isopropyl alcohol
Butanol
Methylamine
Ethylamine
Methyl ethyl ketone
(2-Butanone)
Isopropanol amine
Propylamine
Cyclohexanone
Methyhnorpholine
Diethylamine
Tetrahydrofuran
Piperdine
Moiphdline
Pentanediol
Diethylene glycol
Octanol
Methylbutanol
Methyl isopropyl ketone
Ethyl piperdine
7440-02-0
7440-47-3
208030-75-5
Nickel
Chromium
Dioctylamine
Bisaminopropylmethylamine
1 ,3-Diaminopropane
Diethylbutylamine
1 ,2-Diaminopropane
Dimethylamino propylamine
3-Dimethylamino
propylamine
Dimethylcyclohexylamine
Emoxypropylamine
Ethyl dimethyl propylamine
Methaminepropamine
Methyl cyclohexylamine
Methocypropylamine
3-Methoxypropinitrite
Methyl piperdine
Imino-bis-propylamine
Octylamine
Trioctylamine
mono-Trioxatridecanediamine
Trioxatridecanediamine
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S.EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-58
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
STEP 3:
TABLE A-l.9-3
DELETE NONDETECTED COMPOUNDS WITH NO TOXICOLOGICAL DATA
50-32-8
51-28-5
53-70-3
56-23-5
56-55-3
59-50-7
67-64-1
67-66-3
67-72-1
71-43-2
71-55-6
74-83-9
74-87-3
75-00-3
75-01-4
75-09-2
75-15-0
Total Tetrachlorodibenzofuran
Total Pentachlorodibenzofuran
Total Hexachlorodibenzofuran
Total Heptachlorodibenzofuran
2-Methylphenol
Benzo(a)pyrehe
2,4-Dinitrophenol '
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzo(a)anthracene
A. fl-ilnm 7 iLmfli1unlin~.nl
T V'i iiv/xv/~«/~mviimypiAwmjx • ' -
Acetone
Chlorofonn
Hexachloroethane
Benzene
1 , 1 , 1 -Trichloroethane
Bromomethane
Chloromethane
n-l1.nrn«»rtHM»«.
^SIAMJM. Wt.1 IdiiV
Vinyl Chloride
Methylene Chloride
Carbon disulfide
}?*f&%"j3j%f. ?£-.•!&>• %
1.34E-10
4.71E-11
2.25E-11
8.33E-11
<3.16E-7
<5.20E-8 ,
<1.10E-6
<5:84E-8
<2.53E-7
<5.40E-8
<3.74E-7
3.79E-7
1.58E-5
<4.06E-7
2.97E-5
6.10E-7
<4.19E-7
<4.UE-7
<5.76E-7
<3.67E-7
5.15E-5
<3.67E-7
No toxicological
data
Sfo toxicological
data
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering1
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-59
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Anpendii A-l _
July 1998
STEP 3:
TABLE A-l.9-3
DELETE NONDETECTED COMPOUNDS WITH NO TOXICOLOGICAL DATA
l*Tlk ftt Ttf •»ltl«l»-
bjBBQE EB^^^^BBBB I1
~ "V'Ww! > """i — c""|~" ," '"'
1
75-25-2
75-27-4
75-27-4
75-34-3
75-69-4
77-47-4
78-03-3
78-59-1
78-87-5
79-00-5
79-00-5
79-34-5
83-32-9
84-66-1
84-74-2
85-01-8
85-68-7
86-30-6
86-73-7
87-68-3
87-86-5
v.lHMJiutlllu i •
°, , ' t' ', -
Bromofonn
Bromodichloromethane
Dibromochloromethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
Trichloroflouromethane
Hexachlorocyclopentadine
2-Butanone
T«.-Ln1inrj-Lnr
jjawj^JXlvIl vllw
1^-Dichloropropane
TricWoroehtene
1 , 1 ^-Trichloroethane
l,lA2-Tetrachloroethane
Diethylphthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Phenanthrene
Butylbenzylphthalate
I'lOUFCfiC
Hexachlorobutadiene
Pentochlorophenol >
dflncentratioii •
': fs$ - * -•
<3.14E-7
<7.03E-7
<1.83E-7
<1.57E-7
4.33E-7
<3.11E-7
<4.50E-6
<1.49E-7
<2.36E-7
2.62E-7
<2.6lE-7
<2.61E-7
<1.34E-7
7.10E-7
1.22E-6
<8.32E-8
<8.75E-8
<2.00E-7
<1.10E-7
<3.70E-6
<3.94E-7
jRaiioiBale for
4/ flriMIMi'v '*
No toxicological
data
No toxicological
data
f
No toxicological
data
No toxicological
data
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-60
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
TABLE A-l.9-3
STEP 3: DELETE NONDETECTED COMPOUNDS WITH NO TOXICOLOGICAL DATA
CAS Number
"' ?% t x ' "2
88-06-2
88-74-4
88-75-5
91-20-3
91-57-6
91-58-7
91-94-1
95-5-1
95-47-6
95-47-6
95-57-8
95-95-4
98-95-3
99-09-2
100-01-6
100-02-7
100-41-4
100-42-5
5 " *' Compound' - , * '. \> -
' "° . "^ ,- ~ ' . * *
2,4,6 -Trichlorophenol
1m~\Iitmat*i1Smu
<&*~j.'Jitrnnfianj\1
^.•JN i irupnciKji
Napthalene
1 TiTj-t1-n-li-in«.*1»«J«.. »
i"ivicinymaptnaieBe
2-Chloronapthalene
3,3-Dichlorobenzidine
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
o-xylene
Chromium1
2-Chlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
Sfitrobenzene
1 TJttrnani1<«a
-^ -L^llUUCUlIllillM
J. "Mitr-taniljno
1 J.^llU.OcULLLLUw
d >Jitrj->«Virt»»f>1
H"IN iiropjticnoi
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Concentration
, : L«^"*
<3.42E-7
<4.66E-7
<4.26E-7
1.18E-6
<1.36E-7
<1.07E-7
<1.40E-7
<2.23E-7
<1.57E-7
4.68E-4
<2.50E-7
<3.29E-7
<2.69E-7
<4.07E-7
<3.56E-7
<6.90-7
<1.83E-7
<1.31E-7
Rationale for
, • Deletion
No lexicological
data
No toxicological
data
No toxicological
data
No toxicological
data
Mo toxicological
data
No toxicological
data
'Emission rate based on waste feed rate.
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-61
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l _
July 1998
TABLE A-l.9-3
STEP 3: DELETE NONDETECTED COMPOUNDS WITH NO TOXICOLOGICAL DATA
CAS Number
100-51-6
101-55-3
105-67-9
106-42-3
106-45-7
106-47-8
107-06-2
108-05-4
108-10-1
108-39-4
108-60-1
108-88-3
108-90-7
108-95-2
111-44-4
111-91-1
117-81-7
117-84-0
118-74-1
120-12-7
Compound
Benzyl Alcohol
4TI«i«iiini-iTinmr1 nliwivlHlirT
™» »i ULL1\JL/1M\*H J A" LUttrflJJ' AWbUWA
zy'f'.uiiiiciQyipnciioi
m-p-Xylene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
4-Chloroaniline
1,2-Dichloroethane
Vinyl Acetate
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
3-Methylphenol
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Phenol
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
b- fn ytl-l n-riflin-L-*A«m*tVHITUit
is^-i'LJUorocirioxyjinetnanc
bis(2-Elhylhexyl)phthalate
Di-n-octylphthalate
± JLV AttVl ±1U1 *J U Cl-LcA^llW
Anthracene
Concentration
m
3.16E-7
<3.99E-7
<2.97E-7
^l.58E-7
<2.05E-7
<2.08E-7
<1.00E-6
<1.74E-7
<4.45E-7
<3.26E-7
<3.0E-7
2.32E-6
6.97E-7
4.39E-7
<3.19E-7
<2.62E-7
<3.57E-6
<3.51E-8
<2.76E-7
<9.13E-8
Rationale for
DeletKm
No toxicological
data
No toxicological
data
No toxicological
data
No toxicological
data
No toxicological
data
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-62
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
TABLE A-l.9-3
STEP 3: DELETE NONDETECTED COMPOUNDS WITH NO TOXICOLOGICAL DATA
CAS Number
<*" % "* ^ " -C *-
120-82-1
120-83-2
121-14-2
121-30-6
127-18-4
129-00-0
131-11-3
mfiA Q
156-59-2
191-24-2
192-97-2
193-39-5
198-55-0
205-99-2
206-44-0
207-08-9
908-Ofi-8
218-00-0
540-59-0
540-59-2
541-73-1
542-75-6
, - < *"•*•<_ " - ' * '""" ' ~ ' *
v^ Compound *•„ >f^~ -
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
4,6-Dinitro-2-methyphenol
Tetrachloroethene
Pyiene
Dimethylphthalate
Dil-ijirmnAivam
J^lLfWlX£jUlUTCul
Cis-l,2-Dichloroethene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene '
Benzo(e)pyrene
Indeno(l ,2,3-cd)pyrene
Perylene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Fluoranthene
Benzo(k)flouranthene
Chrysene
Trans-l^Z-Dichloroethene
1 ,2-Dichloroethene
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
trans- 1 ,3 -Dichloropropene
, Concentration
- '*&*>", . '
<4.21E-7
<3.11E-7
<3.28E-7
<5.92E-7
<2.09E-7
<5.57E-8
<1.13E-7
<8.09E-7
<2.36E-7
<4.75E-8
<5.06E-8
<4.47E-8
<5.57E-8
<5.03E-8
<6.11E-8
<5.03E-8
<7.52E-8
<5.76E-8
<2.62E-7
<3.16E-7
<2.06E-7
<2.10E-7
Rationale for '
I Deletion ^ -"
No toxicological
data
No toxicological
data
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-63
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
TABLE A-l.9-3
STEP 3: DELETE NONDETECTED COMPOUNDS WITH NO TOXICOLOGICAL DATA
CAS Number
542-75-6
;
No tovicoloffical
data
"KTfi trtvif»nlntncfl.1
data
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-64
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
TABLE A-l.9-3
STEP 3: DELETE NONDETECTED COMPOUNDS WITH NO TOXICOLOGICAL DATA
CAS Number
f "\~ "' V '
7857-2-39-4
109719-77-9
109719-77-9
109719-77-9
125322-32-9
"X "' - - "~ 'C^pouiMl „ ^_ ^-
v,. * '>•:,"„
Total Pentachlorodibenzodioxin
1 ,2,3 ,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran
2,3,4,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzodioxin
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenxodioxin
Concentration
-•• W ,-:.-
<1.39E-12
2.77E-12
5.62E-12
<2.70E-12
1.94E-11
-* >i \ y
Rationale for
Deletion , ^
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-65
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
TABLE A-l.9-4
STEP 4: DELETE COMPOUNDS NOT EXPECTED IN STACK EMISSIONS
CAS Number
50-32-8
51-28-5
53-70-3
56-23-5
56-55-3
59-50-7
67-64-1
67-66-3
67-72-1
71-43-2
71-55-6
74-83-9
74-87-3
75-00-3
Compound
Total TetracMorodibenzofuran
Total Pentachlorodibenzofiiran
Total Hexachlorodibenzofuran
Total Heptachlorodibenzofuran
2-Methylphenol
Benzo(a)pyrene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
/•••.rl-inn TrtpmfWrwifii*
X^CUUVJAl i WtlttVmVJL.i**V
Benzo(a)anthracene
» /-n_l . . f mrfVl1ir.»l.1M»«%J
^•UiiU5lvi*J"iKCuiiypncnoi
Acetone
CMorofonn
Hi.i — »*]••.••,
exacniorocuianc
Benzene
1 , 1 , 1 -Trichloro ethane
Bromomethane
/-Tl,1 ,-, rj-i_rfTl»r»-
(^uioroetnane
Concentration
(g/a)
1.34E-10
4.71E-11
2.25E-11
8.33E-11
<3.16E-7
<5.20E-8
<1.10E-6
<5.84E-8
<2.53E-7
<5.40E-8
.<3.74E-7
3.79E-7
1.58E-5
<4.06E-7
2.97E-5
6.10E-7
<4.19E-7
<4.11E-7
<5.76E-7
Rationale for
Deletion ,
Chlorinated
compounds not
used at facility.
No lexicological
data
Chlorinated
compounds not
used at facility.
Chlorinated
compounds not
used at facility.
No toxicological
data
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-66
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
TABLE A-l.9-4
STEP 4: DELETE COMPOUNDS NOT EXPECTED IN STACK EMISSIONS
CAS Number
•*- \*t ->g > >
75-01-4
75-09-2
75-15-0
75-25-2 .
75-27-4
75-27-4
75-34-3
75-69-4
77-47-4
78-03-3
78-59-1
78-87-5
79-00-5
79-00-5
' "«- ,„* '*•<:*> Ce&uieriifeO '' - *• O < T
^ ,; '-v' * "* *¥ v ?4 <, *
•><"*/< nirn1nrninr.-in.inj.
X j < *:
<3.67E-7
5.15E-5
<3.67E-7
<3.14E-7
<1.83E-7
<7.03E-7
<1.57E-7
4.33E-7
<3.11E-7
<4.50E-6
<1.49E-7
<2.36E-7
2.62E-7
<2.61E-7
Rationale for >
^^•OclAlMi '*
Chlorinated
compounds not
used at facility.
Chlorinated
compounds not
used at facility.
Chlorinated
compounds not
used at facility.
Chlorinated
compounds not
used at facility.
No lexicological
data
Chlorinated
compounds not
used at facility.
Chlorinated
compounds not
used at facility.
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-67
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
TABLE A-l.9-4
STEP 4: DELETE COMPOUNDS NOT EXPECTED IN STACK EMISSIONS
CAS Number
79-34-5
83-32-9
84-66-1
84-74-2
85-01-8
85-68-7
86-30-6
86-73-7
87-68-3
87-86-5
88-06-2
88-74-4
88-75-5
91-20-3
91-57-6
Compound
1 1 " T T>ti » 1i1-i.r-u>t1*9m*
l.yX y4»y£*~ X t/UaVUlt/l.UWUlCUlW
A j-.nrimti1itTi.rnr
^"XWWAJa^UJLLLiWJJlW
Diethylphihalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Phenanihrene
Butylbenzylphthalate
N"Witr.nen,r1inh/Mw1nm!lli»
~ l.^imjJUMJL>AJLWAJL Y .ml III IJLW
HnjT
LILU.W1-1W
CXaCmOrODUlaulCnC
Pj.iT.i--1i1--Lrv-Ln1i.-ri.nl
cniocAioropncnux
^ A fi Trij-1i1rLf«A«U/»MAl
^jT5U ~ X J. 1 WJIUU1 V/jL/i.lVlJLUZ
^-i ^ i uuanmiic
** >llfM%«%1m^4Al
4&.~JL^1U.WJ^11VAJWJ1.
Napthalene
0 'I'-fVnrlTiiimtU^lrM**
^
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
TABLE A-l.9-4
STEP 4: DELETE COMPOUNDS NOT EXPECTED IN STACK EMISSIONS
CAS Number
* ^
91-58-7
91-94-1
95-5-1
95-47-6
95-47-6
95-57-8
95-95-4
98-95-3
99-09-2
100-01-6
100-02-7
100-41-4
100-42-5
100-51-6
101-55-3
Compound * - " '
" CM -vmnnn«1n»ii»*l».«
+Jy*J -LXJ. VJ-U WJ. \j i.tifti ts, IV|| 1 1C
1 " n!rh1ni-j-LK<»»riirM»o
•i. JA* jLyiWluLU wL/CJ.x£idlw
Chromium
o-xylene
** r^lllj-MWulKMnrtl
^ \^ixiv/i.o^jii^rim
0 A *{ Trij-1l1j»«*n«bcv>ml
^*j~Ty*/~ X JLXVXUl^JLV/^MldlCjJt
Nitroben2Ene
1 "KTifnnaniUoa
-/ — 1 ^IJL u vrcuii nm?
A "Mitnr>a*iJ1«n.
*f-IN luXJ aniline
4"T>I itfophcnol
Ethylbenzene
Styrene
Benzyl Alcohol
A T. 1 t ,
4"Uronioptaciiyl-plicuylether
Concentration
-" m *•-.:.
<1.07E-7
<1.40E-7
<2.23E-7
4.68E-4
<1.57E-7
<2.50E-7
<3.29E-7
<2.69E-7
<4.07E-7
<3.56E-7
<6.90-7
<1.83E-7
<1.31E-7
3.16E-7
<3.99E-7
Rationale for "
* •" -DeletioB^ '
Chlorinated
compounds not
used at facility.
Chlorinated
compounds not
used at facility.
Chlorinated
compounds not
used at facility.
Chlorinated
compounds not
used at facility.
Chlorinated
compounds not
used at facility.
No toxicological
data
No toxicological
data
No toxicological
data
sfo toxicological
data
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-69
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
TABLE A-l.9-4
STEP 4: DELETE COMPOUNDS NOT EXPECTED IN STACK EMISSIONS
CAS Number
1AC £.n O
105-o7-y
106-42-3
1 C\C. A C *7
luo-4j-/
1 f\f An Q
1UO-4/-6
107-06-2
108-05-4
108-10-1
108-39-4
lUo-OU-1
108-88-3
108-90-7
108-95-2
111 A A A
111-44-4
mni 1
-yi-i
117-81-7
117-84-0
11O *7/1 1
11O-/4-1
Compound
f **
n A T-k;.,,_ft.l-,n1_i,-.w»1
Xj't'lJinietnyipnenoi
m-p-Xylene
jfUiCmOrODCIlZCIlC
A m.1 -i-
4"ChlOTO3HlllQC
1,2-Dichloroeihane
Vinyl Acetate
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
3-Methylphenol
z,z Uxyws (iJ."Unioropropancjj
Toluene
Chlorobenzene
Phenol
b* /n /-il_1_ -,.+lvtr1^*1«»»
is(/"Unioroetnyijeincr
b? m /-n.1 — i,-+1n,-LT-iA»»iVliZiWliv/
Concentration
(st») ,
<297E-7
<1.58E-7
<2 05E-7
<2 08E-7
<1.00E-6
<1.74E-7
<4.45E-7
<3.26E-7
-------
Human. Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
TABLE A-l.9-4
STEP 4: DELETE COMPOUNDS NOT EXPECTED IN STACK EMISSIONS
CASftoritMBr
^ % -* " •>
120-12-7
120-82-1
120-83-2
121-14-2
121-30-6
127-18-4
129-00-0
131-11-3
132-64-9
156-59-2
191-24-2
192-97-2
193-39-5
198-55-0
205-99-2
206-44-0
207-08-9
208-96-8
218-00-0
540-59-0
^ ^ , \ , Compound " ° " •> - ,
" •> ' " , , < fs < -^ *s ^ „ ' " '"'*' *' *<.
~^v * "* < t >"•»•' ^/^r*"- - ^
Anthracene
1 ** J. Trir'hln.rj-iVinnTjtnji
^ )^9^~ X X±VAJJLV/X\/ wll^^lw
^ jl 'HirMj-Lnn.nVirniil
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
4,6-Dinitro-2-methyphenol
Tetrachloroethene
Pyrene
Dimethylphthalate
T>;t-r_ g
J^l UwiiAiuinTcul
Cis- 1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Benzo(g,h,i)peiylene
Benzo(e)pyrene
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
Perylene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Fluoranthene
Benzo(k)flouranthene
A j-r n »*<«1«>»1.».>..
Acciutpinyicue
Chrysene
Trans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethene
* Concentration
./'/^W'-'rV
<9.13E-8
<4.21E-7
<3.11E-7
<3.28E-7
<5.92E-7
<2.09E-7
<5.57E-8
Rationale for
, -^IWfetbn.'^
Chlorinated
compounds not
used at facility.
Chlorinated
compounds not
used at facility.
No lexicological
data
No toxicological
data
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-71
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
TABLE A-l.9-4
STEP 4: DELETE COMPOUNDS NOT EXPECTED IN STACK EMISSIONS
CAS Number
540-59-2
CA 1 11 1
J41-/J-1
CAf) 1C £
342- /3-D
ejtf) *tc £
D42- /D-O
rot TO £
Dyi-/c-o
606-20-2
621-64-7
1090-42-5
1746-01-6
3268-87-9
nf\f\c *7O 3
7UU5- /2-a
10408-74-3
35822-46-9
39001-02-0
39227-85-7
55673-89-7
57117-41-6
57117-41-6
57117-44-9
Compound
1 ,2-Dichloroethene
1 ** TXi-l-ilriT-nKM^WM**
i , j -jJiCmoro Dcnzcnc
OJLia~ A j J -^/JLW±1±WA \J^fl U^/V11W
^ir 1 T 'n;j-ViTj-Lt--mrj'M"w»»«»
V1O~ J. 5 J " i-/lWlllV/X\J^i VIJ^/VllV
** TT.-T.-jnj-Lnr
db~JL AW^VCUIXUIV
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylatnine
Nickel
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin
Octachlorodibenzodioxin
A /-t1-1 t--._lr1 t-l1l
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l ^__^_
July 1998
TABLE A-l.9-4
STEP 4: DELETE COMPOUNDS NOT EXPECTED IN STACK EMISSIONS
€AS^M«uwfeegr
57117-44-9
57653-85-7
60851-34-5
70648-26-9
70648-26-9
72918-21-9
7857-2-39-4
109719-77-9
109719-77-9
109719-77-9
125322-32-9
, , , " Compound
* -° " -. > >f " = ' *
1,2,3,6, 7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
1,2,3,6, 7,8-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin
Octachlorodibenzofuran
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzofuran
Total Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin
Total Pentachlorodibenzodioxin
1 ,2,3 ,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran
2,3,4,6,7,8-HexacWorodibenzofuran
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzodioxin
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenxodioxin
Concentration ,
" '* fe/s) >
<1.39E-12
<1.39E-12
8.56E-12
8.33E-12
1.04E-11
2.77E-12
<1.39E-12
2.77E-12
5.62E-12
<2.70E-12
1.94E-11
„ Rationale ibr .
' " BefeifoBV^"
'i
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-73
-------
-------
California Air Resources Board (CARB). 1990a. "Health Risk Assessment Guidelines for Nonhazardous
Waste Incinerators." Prepared by the Stationary Source Division of the CARB and the California
Department of Health Services.
CARB. 1990b. "Technical Support Document of Proposed Dioxins Control Measures for Medical Waste
Incinerators." May 25.
CARB. 1991. "Air Pollution Control at Resource Recovery Facilities. Update."
CARB. 1996. "Proposed Amendments to the Emission Inventory Criteria and Guidelines Report
Published in Accordance with the Air Toxics 'Hot Spots' Information and Assessment Act of
1987." May.
Castaldini, C., and others. 1984. "Engineering Assessment Report—Hazardous Waste Cofiring in
Industrial Boilers." Report to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under Contract No
68-02-3188. June.
Dellinger, B., D.L. Hall, J.L. Graham, S.L. Mazer, W.A. Rubey, and M. Malanchuk. 1986. PIC
Formation Under Pyrolytic'and Starved Air Conditions.. Prepared for the U.S. EPA Industrial
Environmental Research Laboratory. Prepared by the University of Dayton Research Institute
EPA/600/2-86/006. NTIS PB-86-145422. January.
Dellinger, B., J.L. Torres, W.A. Rubey, D.L. Hall, and J.L. Graham. 1984. Determination of the
Thermal Decomposition Properties of 20 Selected Hazardous Organic Compounds. Prepared for
the U.S. EPA Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory. Prepared by the University of
Dayton Research Institute. EPA-600/2-84-138. NTIS PB-84-232487. August.
Demsey, C.R., and E.T. Oppelt. 1993. "Incineration of Hazardous Waste: A Critical Review Update "
Air and Waste. 43:25-73.
Duval, D.S., and W.A. Rubey. 1976. Laboratory Evaluation of High-Temperature Destruction of
Kepone and Related Pesticides. EPA-600/2-76-299. NTIS PB-264892/1. December.
Duval, D.S., and W.A. Rubey. 1977. Laboratory Evaluation of High-Temperature Destruction of
Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Related Compounds. EPA-600/2-77-228. NTIS PB-279139/0.
December.
Kramlich, J.C., W.R. Seeker, and M.P. Heap. 1984. "Laboratory-Scale Flame Mode Study of Hazardous
Waste Incineration." Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Research Symposium on Incineration
and Treatment of Hazardous Waste. Fort Mitchell, Kentucky. May 2 through 4, 1983
EPA-600/9-84/015. NTIS PB-84-234525. Pages 79-94. July.
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-75
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
Olexsey, RA., G.L. Huffrnan, and G.M. Evans. 1985. "Emission and Control of By-Products from
Hazardous Waste Combustion Processes." Proceedings of the llth Annual Research Symposium
on Incineration and Treatment of Hazardous Waste. Cincinnati, Ohio. April 29 to May 1,1985.
EPA-600/9-85/028. NTIS PB-86-199403. Pages 8-15. September.
Trenholm, A., and R. Hathaway. 1984. "Products of Incomplete Combustion from Hazardous Waste
Incinerators." Proceedings of the 10th Annual Research Symposium on Incineration and
Treatment of 'Hazardous Waste. Fort Mitchell, Kentucky. April 3-5. EPA-600/9-84/022. NTIS
PB-85-116291. Pages 84-95. September.
Trenholm, Andrew R., David W.Kapella, and Gary D.Hmshaw. 1992. "Organic Products of Incomplete
Combustion from Hazardous Waste Combustion." Proceedings of the Air and Waste
Management Association 85th Annual Meeting and Exhibition. Kansas City, Missouri. June
21-26.
Trenholm, A., and C.C. Lee. 1986. "Analysis of PIC and Total Mass Emissions from an Incinerator."
Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Research Symposium on Land Disposal,. Remedial Action,
Incineration, and Treatment of Hazardous Waste. Cincinnati, Ohio. April 21 to 23, 1986.
EPA/60-9-86/022. Pages 376-381. August.
Trenholm, A., and others. 1984. "Performance Evaluation of Full-Scale Hazardous Waste Incinerators."
Report to U.S. EPA under Contract No. 68-02-3177.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1981. "Incinerator Standards for Owners and Operators of
Hazardous Waste Management Facilities; Interim Final Rule and Proposed Rule." Federal
Register. 46(15):7666-7690. January 23.
U.S. EPA. 1985. Report on the Incineration of Liquid Hazardous Wastes. Science Advisory Board.
Environmental Effects, Transport, and Fate Committee. April.
U.S. EPA. 1987. Total Mass Emissions from a Hazardous Waste Incinerator. Final Report. Midwest
Research Institute. EPA-600/S2-87/064. NTIS PB-87-228508/AS. June 12.
U.S. EPA. 1988. "Hospital Waste Combustion Study: Data Gathering Phase." Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. EPA-450/3-88-008.
December.
U.S. EPA. 1989. Guidance of PIC Controls for Hazardous Waste Incinerators. Volume V of the
Hazardous Waste Incineration Guidance Series. EPA/530-SW-90-040. April 3.
U.S. EPA. 1990a. "Standards for Owners and Operators of Hazardous Waste Incinerators and Burning of
Hazardous Wastes in Boilers and Industrial Furnaces; Proposed Rule, Supplemental Proposed
Rule, Technical Corrections, and Request for Comments." Federal Register.
55(82):17862-17921. April 27.
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-76
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-l
July 1998
U.S. EPA. 1990b. Report of the Products of Incomplete Combustion Subcommittee of the Science
Advisory Board; Review ofOSWProposed Controls for Hazardous Waste Incineration Products
of Incomplete Combustion. EPA-SAB EC-90-004. October 24.
U.S. EPA. 1993. Review Draft Addendum to the Methodology for Assessing Health Risks Associated
with Indirect Exposure to Combustor Emissions. OHEA. ORB. EPA-600-AP-93-003.
November 10.
U.S. EPA. 1994a. Revised Draft Guidance for Performing Screening Level Risk Analyses at
Combustion Facilities Burning Hazardous Wastes: Attachment C, Draft Exposure Assessment
Guidance for RCRA Hazardous Waste Combustion Facilities. Office of Emergency and
Remedial Response (OERR). OSW. December 14.
U.S. EPA. 1994b. "Table 1—Chemicals Recommended for Identification and Table 2—Chemicals for
Potential Identification." Draft Exposure Assessment Guidance for Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act Hazardous Waste Combustion Facilities: Attachment. April 15.
U.S. EPA. 1995. "Basis for Listing Hazardous Waste.: Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 261,
Appendices VII and VIII.
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-l-77
-------
-------
APPENDIX A-2
TARGET ORGANS AND CRITICAL EFFECTS
FOR COMPOUNDS WITH REFERENCE DOSE VALUES
-------
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-2
July 1998
TABLE A-2
TARGET ORGANS AND CRITICAL EFFECTS
FOR COMPOUNDS WITH REFERENCE DOSE VALUES
(Page 1 of 7)
Acenaphthene
Ammonia
Bromodichloromethane
• *' $^^^
.v?w&mi'?
83-32-9
67-64-1
75-05-8
98-86-2
107-02-8
107-13-1
309-00-2
7664-41-7
120-12-7
7440-36-0
12674-11-2
11097-69-1
7440-38-2
7440-39-3
100-52-7
92-87-5
65-85-0
7440-41-7
92-52-4
117-81-7
542-88-1
75-27-4
75-25-2
85-68-7
7440-43-9
75-15-0
57-74-9
7782-50-5
Liver
Liver
Kidney
Blood
General
- • - •
Reproductive
Liver
Sensory
-
Blood
Reproductive system
Eye
General toxicity
Immune system
Skin
Blood pressure
Gastrointestinal
Kidney
Liver
-
-
Kidney
Liver
-
Kidney
Liver •
Liver
Kidney
Reproductive
Liver
$$&
Increased liver weights |
Decreased red blood cell counts and hematocrit
Hepatotoxicity
Ocular exudate, inflamed and prominent meibomian glands
Distorted growth of fingers and toenails
Decreased amtibody (IgM and IgG) response to sheep
Hyperpigmentation, keratosis, and possible vascular
Forestomach lesions
Liver cell alterations in females
Significantly increased liver-to-body weight and liver-to-brain
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-2-1
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-2
July 1998
TABLE A-2 (Continued)
TARGET ORGANS AND CRITICAL EFFECTS
FOR COMPOUNDS WITH REFERENCE DOSE VALUES
(Page 2 of 8)
• ' Cwnpoowl ' " ".".'.;
CMoroaniline.j-
Chlorobenzene
Chlorobenzilate
Chlorophenol, 2-
Chlorotoluene,fr-
Chlorpvrifos
Chromium
ChromiuraVI
Creaol, o-(2-methylphenol)
Cresol, p-
rSmwfW!
Cyanide
Cyanogen
Cyanogen bromide
Cyanogen chloride
DDT, 4,4'-
Demeton
DiazSnon
Dibromoethane, 1.2-
Dkhlorobenzene, o-
Dlchlorodifluoromethane
^CASNfc^
L06-47-8
108-90-7
510-15-6
67-66-3
91-58-7
95-57-8
95-49-8
2921-88-2
7440-47-3
18540-29-9
95-48-7
106-44-5
98-82-8
57-12-5
460-19-5
506-68-3
506-77-4
50-29-3
8065-48-3
333-41-5
124-48-1
106-93-4
84-74-2 ,
95-50-1
75-71-8
Target Organ
jver
Liver
Kidney
Death
„
Body weight
' f Ciritlc4il Effect ^^l_i__>k-. it^_ ^__ ^
gggggggjggpg0|MgggB2BB(BBBHBHBBH>HHMHBBHa^i^^^^^M
Nonneoplastic lesions of the splenic capsule
Histopathologic changes in liver
Decreased stool quantity, food consumption, and body weight
Hyperirritability
Fatty cyst formation in liver
Dyspnea, abnormal appearance, liver enlargement
Reproductive effects
Decrease in body weight gain
Decreased plasma cholinesterase activity
No observed effects
No observed effects
Decreased body weights
Neurotoxicity
Maternal death
Hypoactivity
Respiratory distress
Increased average kidney weight
No observed effects
Weight loss
Myelin degeneration
Thyroid effects
Weightless
Myelin degeneration
Thyroid effects
Weight loss
Myelin degeneration
Liver lesions
Cholinesterase inhibition
Optic nerve degeneration
Decreased cholinesterase activity
Hepatic lesions
Spermatogenic effects
Increased mortality
No adverse effects observed 1
Reduced body weight 1
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S.EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-2-2
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-2
July 1998
TABLE A-2 (Continued)
TARGET ORGANS AND CRITICAL EFFECTS
FOR COMPOUNDS WITH REFERENCE DOSE VALUES
(Page 3 of 8)
•_^&KsiH&ar:-:*\ '
Dichloroethane, 1,1-
\fifMj acio)
Dieldrin
Diethyl phthalate
'vCttfHfc*'
75-34-3
75-35-4
156-60-5
156-59-2
120-83-2
94-75-7
542-75-6
62-73-7
60-57-1
84-66-2
105-67-9
131-11-3
528-29-0
99-65-0
100-25-4
131-89-5
51-28-5
121-14-2
606-20-2
117-84-0
122-39-4
: TarfietOrean
_• . .
Liver
Blood
Organ weight
Immunotoxicity
Blood
Kidney
Organ weights
Nervous system
Blood
Liver
Body weight
General toxicity
Blood
Kidney ,
Spleen
Eye
Eye
Gastrointestinal -
Death
Blood
Gastrointestinal
Kidney
Kidney
Body weight
Kidney
, ' "-. /- ->*- ''*^xtitetti£t: "*':? " %\w"^'^
Increased organ weight
Hematologic toxicity
Hepatic toxicity -
Brain cholinesterase inhibition
Decreased growth rate and food consumption
Lethargy, prostration, ataxia,
Heinze bodies and biliary tract hyperplasia
Decreased survival
Heinze bodies, methemoglobinemia
Hyperplasia of me bile duct
Histopathologic changes in the kidney
Increased kidney weight
Decreased body weight gain r
ncreased kidney weight
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-2-3
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-2
July 1998
TABLE A-2 (Continued)
TARGET ORGANS AND CRITICAL EFFECTS
FOR COMPOUNDS WITH REFERENCE DOSE VALUES
(Page 4 of 8)
Disulfoton
sndosulfanl
Endothall
Endrin
Eoichlorohydrin
Ethylbenzene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Freooll3
Furan
Furfural
Glycidaldehyde
Hexachloroethane
298-04-4
115-29-7
145-73-3
72-20-8
106-89-8
110-80-5
100-41-4
107-21-1
96-45-7
97-63-2
206-44-0
86-73-7
50-00-0
64-18-6
76-13-1
110-00-9
98-01-1
765-34-4
76-44-8
1024-57-3
118-74-1
87-68-3
77-47-4
67-72-1
Nervous system
Kidney
Gastrointestinal
Kidney
Blood
Kidney
Critical Effect ' : ,
Optic nerve degeneration
Cholinesterase inhibition
Decrease in body weight gain
Neurotoxicity
Marked progressive glomerulonephrosis and blood vessel
anurysms in males
Increased absolute and relative weights of stomach and small
intestine
Occasional convulsions
Mild histological lesions
Kidney lesions (route-to-route extrapolation)
Decreased body weight
Kidney toxicity
Liver toxicity
Kidney toxicity
Increased incidence of thyroid hyperplasia
Increased relative weight of the kidney
Hematological alterations and clinical effects
Nephropathy
Increased liver weights
Decreased red blood cell count, packed cell volume and
hemoglobin
Reduced weight gain, histopathology in rats
Decreased growth rate
Psychomotor impairment
Hepatic lesions
Mild hepatocellular vacuolization
Enlarged adrenals
Hydropic renal pelvis and hematopoietic effects
Retarded weight gain
Liver weight increases hi males only
Increased liver-to-body weight ratio
Liver effects
Renal tubules regeneration
Stomach lesions
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-2-4
-------
Human. Health. Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-2 ,
July 1998
TABLE A-2 (Continued)
TARGET ORGANS AND CRITICAL EFFECTS
FOR COMPOUNDS WITH REFERENCE DOSE VALUES
(Page 5 of 8)
-- Compound ^ r
Hexachlorophene
Hexane, n-
Isophorone
Malathione
Maleic hydrazide
Malononitrile
Manganese
Mercuric chloride
Mercury (inorganic)
Merphos
Methacrylonitrile
Methanol
Methoxychlor
Methoxyethanol, 2-
Methyl acetate
Methyl bromide
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methyl isobutyl ketone
Methyl mercury
Methyl parathione
Methyl serene (mixed isomers)
Methylene bromide
Methylene chloride
Methylphenol, 3-(m-Cresol)
Naled
Nickel, soluble salts
Nitroaniline, 2-
.CASlSfoI
70-30-4
110-54-3
78-59-1
121-75-5
123-33-1
109-77-3
7439-96-5
7787-94-7
7439-97-6
150-50-5
126-98-7
67-56-1
72-43-5
109-86-4
79-20-9
74-83-9
78-93-3
108-10-1
22967-92-6
298-00-0
25013-15-4
74-95-3
75-09-2
108-39-4
300-76-5
7440-02-0
88-74-4
i. ' , Target Organ t
Salivary gland
Brain and optic nerve
Nervous system
Respiratory
Kidney
Blood
Kidney
Liver -
Spleen
Nervous system
Immune system
Nervous system
Nervous system
Wholebody
Liver
Nervous system
Blood
Reproductive
Reproductive
Liver
Gastrointestinal
Reproductive
Kidney
Liver
Nervous system
Nervous system
Blood
• •
Respiratory
Blood
Liver
Body weight
Nervous system
Nervous system
Body weight
Organ weight
Blood
'x *~ ' ' *- v- "' vQriiieftl Effect -^
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-2
July 1998
TABLE A-2 (Continued)
TARGET ORGANS AND CRITICAL EFFECTS
FOR COMPOUNDS WITH REFERENCE DOSE VALUES
(Page 6 of 8)
'" " ' 'CJMHMMMMi
Nitrobenzene
Pentachlorobenzene
PenUchlorophenol
Phthalic anhydride
Pronimide
Propargyl alcohol
Propyfcne glycol monomethyl
ether
Ronnel
Silver
Strychnine and salts
Styrene
Tetrtchloroethane
(carbon tetrachloride)
Tetrtchloroethane, 1,1,1,2-
Tetrachlorophenol, 2,3,4,6-
Thallium
Toluene
- CAS No.
98-95-3
621-64-7
608-93-5
82-68-8
87-86-5
108-95-2
298-02-2
85-44-9
23950-58-5
107-19-7
107-98-2
129-00-0
110-86-1
299-84-3
7782-49-2
7440-22-4
57-24-9
100-42-5
95-94-3
56-23-5
630-20-6
127-18-4
58-90-2
7440-28-0
108-88-3
Target Oiwui" >
Aoven&l
Blood
Liver
Renal
_
Kidney
Liver
Liver
Kidney
Liver
Reproductive
Nervous system
Kidney
Respiratory
_
Kidney
Liver
Kidney
Liver
Kidney
Liver
Liver
Respiratory
Skin
General
Blood
Liver
Kidney
Liver
Kidney
Liver
Liver
Liver
Liver
Kidney
Liver
" * * /' Critical Ktfwt ° ! .< . " . :
Adrenal lesions
Hemolytic anemia
Renal lesions
Hepatic lesions
No observed adverse effects
Kidney toxicity
Liver toxicity
Hepatotoxicity
Kidney pathology
Liver pathology
Reduced fetal body weight in rats
Cholinesterase inhibition
Histopathology
Lung damage
No observed effects
Hepatotoxicity
Renal toxicity
Histopathologic changes of the kidney
Histopathologic changes of the liver
Renal tubular pathology and decreased kidney weights
Increased liver weight
Liver effects
Clinical selenosis
Argyria
Toxicity and histopatliology
Red blood cell effects
Liver effects
Kidney lesions
Liver lesions
Mineralization of the kidneys in males
Hepatic clear cell changes in females
Hepatotoxicity in mice, weight gain in rats
Increased liver weight and centrilobular hypertrophy
Increased levels of SCOT and LDH
Changes hi kidney weights
Chanees in liver weiehts
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-2-6
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-2
July 1998
, TABLE A-2 (Continued)
TARGET ORGANS AND CRITICAL EFFECTS
FOR COMPOUNDS WITH REFERENCE DOSE VALUES
(Page 7 of 8)
B^-;r%36Sl^lf>^^
Toluene-2,6-diamine
Trichlorobenzene, 1,2,4-
Trichloroethane, 1,1,2-
Trichlorofluoramethane
(Freonll)
Trichlorophenol, 2,4,5-
Trichloropropane, 1,2,3-
Trinitrobenzcne, sym-
Trinitrotoluene, 2,4,6-
Vinyl acetate
Xylenes
Xylene, m-
Xylene, o-
Zinc
j^BSSiSSi^
823-40-5
120-82-1
79-00-5
75-69-4
95-95-4
96-18-4
99-35-4
118-96-7
108-05-4
1330-20-7
108-38-3
95-47-6
7440-66-6
^iSSSStS^SS^^
—
Adrenal
Blood
Death
General
Kidney
Liver
Blood
Spleen
Liver
Body weight
Kidney
Death
Body weight
Nervous system
Death
Body weight
Nervous system
Nervous system
Blood
No adverse effects observed
Increased adrenal weights; vacuolation of zona fasciculate in
the cortex
Clinical serum chemistry
Decreased survival
Histopathology
Kidney pathology
Liver pathology
Increased spleen weight
Liver effects
Decreased body weight
Altered kidney weight
Increased mortality
Decreased body weight
Hyperactivity
Increase mortality
Decreased body weight
Hyperactivity
Hyperactivity
47% decrease in erythrocyte superoxide dismutase
Note:
Target organ and critical effect information presented in this table is intended only to provide the information
needed to break down calculated hazard quotients for various chemicals, based on the target organs that they affect
(see Section 7.3 of the HHRAP). The information is intended to be neither (1) an exhaustive list of the potential
toxic effects of a compound, or (2) an indication that toxicological studies for a substance are inadequate because
the target organ or critical effect for each particular substance is limited to one or two reported health effects. The
noncancer reference dose (RfD) for ingestion exposure, or the reference concentration (RfC) for inhalation
exposures, is generally based on the experimental dose that produces no adverse effects in the most sensitive
laboratory animal tested (referred to as the no-observed-adverse effects-level [NOAEL]). If all of the doses used in
experimental studies produce some effect, the lowest dose at which an adverse effect is observed (referred to as the
lowest-observed-adverse-effect-level) is used to determine the Rfl> or RfC. Bom uncertainty factors and modifying
factors are included in the calculation ofRfDs to ensure that these values are protective of human health (see
Appendix A-3) (U.S. EPA 1988).
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
UiS.EPA
Office of Solid Waste
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-2
July 1998
References:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 1988. Background Document—RfD Description and Use in Health
Risk Assessments.
U.S.EPA. 1995. "Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables.'Tiscal Year-1995 Annual. Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response. Washington, D.C. EPA/540/R-95/036. May.
U.S.EPA. 1997. Intergrated Risk Information System. December. ...,.„.
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Crater for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-2-8
-------
APPENDIX A-3
COMPOUND SPECIFIC PARAMETER VALUES
-------
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3 -
July 1998
CONTENTS
Section
LIST OF VARIABLES AND COMPOUND-SPECIFIC PARAMETERS A-3-iii
A3.1 GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS AS PRIMARY REFERENCE SOURCES A-3-1
A3.2 GENERAL ANALYSIS AND METHODOLOGY A-3-2
A3.3 PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES A-3-3
A3.3.1 Molecular Weight (MW) . ... "..... A-3-3
A3.3.2 Melting Point Temperature (Tm) A-3-4
A3.3.3 Vapor Pressure (Vp) and Aqueous Solubility (5) A-3-4
A3.3.4 Henry's Law Constant (H) A-3-6
A3.3.5 Diffusivity of COPCs in Air (Da) and Water (£>w) A-3-7
A3.3.6 Octanol-Water Partitioning Coefficient (Km) A-3-8
A3.3.7 Organic Carbon Partition Coefficient (K^ A-3-9
A3.3.7.1 Ionizing Organic Compounds A-3-9
A3.3.7.2 Nonionizing Organic Compounds A-3-10
A3.3.8 Partitioning Coefficients for Soil-Water (Kay, Suspended Sediment-Surface
Water (Kdm), and Bottom Sediment-Sediment Pore Water (Kd^ A-3-12
A3.3.9 COPC Soil Loss Constant Due to Biotic and Abiotic Degradation A-3-14
A3.3.10 Fraction of COPC Air Concentration in the Vapor Phase (Fv) A-3-15
A3.4 BIOTRANSFERFACTORSFORPLANTS A-3-17
A3.4.1 Root Concentration Factor (RCF) A-3-17
A3.4.2 Plant-Soil Bioconcentration Factors for Root Vegetables
(Belowground Produce) (Brnotveg) A-3-18
A3.4.3 Plant-Soil Bioconcentration Factors for Aboveground Produce (Brag)
and Forage (Brforage) A-3-19
A3.4.4 Air-Plant Biotransfer Factors for Aboveground Produce (Bvag)
and forage (Bvforage) A-3-22
A3.5 BIOTRANSFER FACTORS FOR ANIMALS A-3-24
A3.5.1 Biotransfer Factors for Beef (Ba^ and Milk (Bamil^ A-3-24
A3.5.2 Biotransfer Factors for Pork (Ba^ •• A-3-27
A3.5.3 Biotransfer Factors for COPC in Chicken (Ba^,^ and Poultry Eggs
CfcO A-3-28
A3.5.4 Bioconcentration and Bioaccumulation Factors for COPCs in Fish . A-3-30
A3.5.4.1 Bioconcentration Factors for COPC in Fish (BCF^ ... A-3-31
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-i
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
A3.5.4.2
A3 .5 .4.3
Bioaccumulation Factors for COPC in Fish (BAF^ . . . A-3-33
Biota-Sediment Accumulation Factors for COPC in
Fish . ............ A-3-37
A3.6 HUMAN HEALTH BENCHMARKS ....................................... A-3-37
A3.6.1
A3.6.2
A3.6.3
A3.6.4
REFERENCES
Reference Dose (SfD) and Reference Concentration (RfC) A-3-38
Oral Cancer Slope Factor (CSF), Inhalation CSF, and
Inhalation Unit Risk Factor (USF) A-3-38
Explanation of Calculated Toxicity Benchmark Values ., . A-3-39
Uncertainties Involved when using Toxichy Benchmarks Calculated based on
Route-to-Route Extrapolation A-3-40
Attachment
TABLES OF COMPOUND-SPECIFIC PARAMETER VALUES
A-3-43
A-3-51
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-ii
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
Pair
Br,
forage/silage
APPENDIX A-3
LIST OF VARIABLES AND COMPOUND-SPECIFIC PARAMETERS
= Density of air (g/cm3)
Density of forage (g/cm3)
= Biotransfer factor in beef
(mg COPC/kg FW tissue)/(mg COPC/day) OR (day/kg FW tissue)
= Biotransfer factor in chicken
(mg COPC/kg FW tissue)/(mg COPC/day) OR (day/kg FW tissue)
= Biotransfer factor in eggs
(mg COPC/kg FW tissue)/(mg COPC/day) OR (day/kg FW tissue)
= Biotransfer factor in milk
(mg COPC/kg FW tissue)/(mg COPC/day) OR (day/kg FW tissue)
= Biotransfer factor in pork
(mg COPC/kg FW tissue)/(mg COPC/day) OR (day/kg FW tissue)
= Bioaccumulation factor in fish
(mg COPC/kg FW tissue)/(mg COPC/L total water column)
OR (L water/kg FW tissue)
= Bioconcentration factor in fish (L/kg FW OR unitiess)
= Plant-soil bioconcentration factor in aboveground produce
(ug COPC/g DW planting COPC/g DW soil)—unitiess
= Plant-soil bioconcentration factor in forage and silage
(ug COPC/g DW plant)/(ug COPC/g DW soil)—unitiess
= Plant-soil bioconcentration factor in grain
(ug COPC/g DW grain)/(ug COPC/g DW soil)—unitiess
= Plant-soil bioconcentration factor for belowground produce
(ug COPC/g DW plant)/(ug COPC/g DW soil)—unitiess
= Biota-sediment accumulation factor in fish
(mg COPC/kg lipid tissue)/(mg COPC/kg sediment)—unitiess
Volumetric air-to-leaf biotransfer factor in leaf
(Mg COPC/L FW plant)/(ug COPC/L air)—unitiess
= COPC air-to-plant biotransfer factor for aboveground produce
(ug COPC/g DW plant)/(ug COPC/g air)—unitiess
= Air-to-plant biotransfer factor in forage and silage
(ug COPC/g DW plant)/(ug COPC/g air)—unitiess
Junge constant = 1.7 x lO^04 (atm-cm)
Diflusivity of COPC in air (cm2/s)
Diffusivity of COPC in water (cm2/s)
= Fraction of organic carbon in bottom sediment (unitiess)
= Fraction of organic carbon in soil (unitiess)
= Fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment (unitiess)
= Fraction of COPC in water (unitiess)
•^v - Fraction of COPC air concentration in vapor phase (unitiess)
U.S. EPA Region 6 U.S. EPA
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division Office of Solid Waste
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering A-3-iii
Br,
grain
Br,
rootveg
Bv
Bv,
Dw
foc,bs
Joc,s
Joe,sv>
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
Fw
H
Inhalation
CSF
Inhalation
URF
Kd,
Kd
ksg
MW
P'L
Ps
Oral CSF
R
RCF
RfC
RJD
Rp
S
srf
TEF
Vp
Fraction of wet deposition that adheres to plant surfaces (unitless)
Henry's law constant
Inhalation cancer slope factor (mg/kg-day)'1
Inhalation unit risk factor (ug/m3)"1
Soil-water partition coefficient (mL water/g soil OR cm3 water/g soil)
Suspended sediment-surface water partition coefficient
(L water/kg suspended sediment OR cm3 water/g suspended sediment)
Bed sediment-sediment pore water partition coefficient
(L water/kg bottom sediment OR cm3 water/g bottom sediment)
Octanol/water partitioning coefficient
(mg COPC/L octanol)/(mg COPC/L octanol)—unitiess
Soil organic carbon-water partition coefficient (mL water/g soil)
COPC soil loss constant due to biotic and abiotic degradation (yf1)
Molecular weight of COPC (g/mole)
Liquidphase vapor pressure of COPC (atm)
Solid-phase vapor pressure of COPC (atm)
Oral cancer slope factor (mg/kg-day)"'
Universal gas constant (atm-m3/mol-K)
Root concentration factor
(ug COPC/g DW plant)/(ug COPC/mL soil water)
Reference concentration (mg/m3)
Reference dose (mg/kg/day)
Interception factor of edible portion of plant (unitiess)
Solubility of COPC in water (mg COPC/L water)
Entropy of fusion [t±Sf/R = 6.79 (unitiess)]
Whitby's average surface area of particulates (aerosols)
- 3.5 x W06 cm2/cm3 air for background plus local sources
= 1.1 x 10"05 cm2/cm3 air for urban sources
Half-time of COPC in soil (days)
Ambient air temperature (K)
Melting point temperature (K)
Toxicity equivalency factor (unitiess)
Vapor pressure of COPC (atm)
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S.EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-iv
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
APPENDKA-3
The following sections provide the methodology and rationale followed for the selection or development of
compound-specific parameter values recommended by U.S. EPA OSW. Compound-specific values are
provided for (1) physical and chemical properties, (2) fate-and-transport parameters, and (3) health
benchmarks. A summary table of all compound-specific parameter values is provided at the end of this
appendix, followed by individual parameter-value tables for each compound. The individual
parameter-value tables cite sources for each parameter value.
A3.1
PRIMARY GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS
Throughout Appendix A-3, the following guidance documents are referenced as the primary sources for
the development and comparision of compound-specific parameter values, and used to the fullest extent
possible to provide consistency. Therefore, in this appendix, the term primary guidance documents refers
to the following documents:
• U.S. EPA. 1994f. RevisedDraft Guidance for Performing Screening Level Risk
Analyses at Combustion Facilities Burning Hazardous Wastes: Attachment C,
Draft Exposure Assessment Guidance for RCRA Hazardous Waste Combustion
Facilities. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response (OERR). Office of Solid
Waste. December 14.
• U.S. EPA. 1995b. Review Draft Development of Human Health Based and Ecologically
Based Exit Criteria for the Hazardous Waste Identification Project. Volumes I
andH. Office of Solid Waste. March 3.
• North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(NCDEHNR). 1997. North Carolina Protocol for Performing Indirect
Exposure Risk Assessments for Hazardous Waste Combustion Units. January.
To ensure consistency, sources referenced in the primary guidance documents were also evaluated.
Information for certain compounds like PCDDs, PCDFs, and mercury were obtained from the following
documents: .......
• U.S. EPA. 1994a. Estimating Exposure to Dioxin-Like Compounds. External Review
Draft Report. Volumes I-m. Office of Research and Development. Washington, DC
EPA/600/6-88/005Ca,b,c.
• U.S. EPA. 1997g. Mercury Study Report to Congress. Volume HI: Fate and Transport
of Mercury in the Environment. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards and Office
of Research and Development. EPA-452/R-97-005. December.
U.S. EPA (1994a) provides various parameter values for (but are not limited to) PCDDs, PCDFs, and
PCBs. U.S. EPA (1997g) provides various parameter values for mercuric compounds including elemental
mercury, mercuric chloride, and methyl mercury.
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-1
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3 .
July 1998
A3.2
GENERAL ANALYSIS AND METHODOLOGY
This section describes the general analysis and methodology followed for the development of
compound-specific parameter values presented. Compound-specific parameter values in the primary
guidance documents and other sources generally were evaluated as follows:
1.
Compound-specific values for each parameter were compared among the primary guidance
documents and the following observations were noted:
a. Parameter values provided in U.S. EPA (1994f) are limited to 24 compounds. For
these compounds, sources were referenced specifically to each parameter, in
addition to the methodology used to obtain the respective values.
b. U.S. EPA (1995b) provides various parameter values for a comprehensive list of
compounds. The methodology used for determining values was covered in detail.
However, parameter values for each compound were not referenced to a specific
source. Although a comprehensive list of sources was provided, it is difficult to
determine which parameter value for a compound was obtained from which
source.
c. NC DEHNR (1997) provides various parameter values for a comprehensive list of
compounds, including congeners of polychlorinated dibenzo(p)dioxins (PCDDs)
and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs). However, the sections citing the
methodology and sources of values in the NC DEHNR (1997) were reproduced
directly from U.S. EPA (1994f). Therefore, in NC DEHNR (1997), the
compound-specific parameter values that were provided did not correlate with the
sections citing the methodology and sources of values. In addition, only a partial
list of sources was provided for the values. Therefore, it was not possible to
determine the actual source of values with certainty.
2. Sources of values referenced in the primary guidance documents were further researched
and evaluated. Observations affecting usability are included in parameter-specific
discussions for each compound, as appropriate.
3. Values provided in the primary guidance documents were used only when the sources and
applicability of such values could be verified. Additional sources of parameter values
were evaluated, used, and referenced when technically justified.
4. Recommended parameter values obtained using correlations or equations were calculated
using the recommended values for these variables provided in this HHRAP.
In general, for the selection of parameter values, the following three steps were followed:
1. Whenever measured parameter values were available in published literature studies, they
were preferred for use over other types of data. When multiple measured values were
available, the geometric mean of the parameter values is recommended for use.
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-2
-------
Human Health Bisk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
2. In the absence of measured values in published literature that could not be directly
evaluated, parameter values compiled or adopted for use by the primary guidance
documents, U.S. EPA (1994a), and U.S. EPA (1997g) are recommended.
3. If unable to obtain acceptable values from published literature or the primary guidance
documents, parameter values were estimated or calculated using correlation equations
based on sound scientific judgment
The following sections, A3.3 through A3.5, provide compound-specific parameter values, which are
categorized and discussed as follows: (1) organic compounds, including polychlorinated biphenyls (PCS),
and excluding methyl mercury, PCDDs and PCDFs, (2) PCDDs and PCDFs, (3) all metals except
mercury, and (4) the mercuric compounds—mercury (elemental; metal), mercuric chloride (divalent
inorganic mercury), and methyl mercury (organic mercury).
For each of the parameters, the sources of values referenced in this HHRAP are followed by a discussion
and justification of their selection. There is also a brief discussion of the methodology followed by each of
the primary guidance documents. This provides a complete evaluation and comparison of the
compound-specific parameter values provided in the primary guidance documents that are currently used to
conduct risk assessments.
A3.3 PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
A3.3.1 Molecular Weight (MW)
Molecular weight (MW) of a compound is defined as the sum of atomic weights of all atoms in the
compound's molecule.
Orsanics and Metals For most organics (except PCDDs and PCDFs) and metals, this HHRAP provides
MW values that were obtained from the following:
Budavari, S., M.J. O'Neil, A. Smifli, and P.E. Heckelman. 1989. The Merck Index: An
Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs, and Biologicals. 11th Edition. Merck and Company,
Inc. Rahway, New Jersey.
MW values not provided in Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989) were obtained from the
following document:
Montgomery, J.H., and L.M. Welkom. 1991. Groundwater Chemicals Desk Reference.
Lewis Publishers. Chelsea, Michigan.
Because Budavari, O'neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989) provides AW values for most of the compounds
evaluated, it was used as the primary source to ensure consistency. MW values are based on the
compound's formula; and, the values in Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989) are the same as
the values cited in several literature sources. AW values for most of the compounds in the primary
guidance documents were also obtained from Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989).
PCDDs and PCDFs AW values for PCDDs and PCDFs were obtained from U.S. EPA (1994a).
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-3
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
Mercuric Compounds MPT values for mercury and mercuric chloride were obtained from Budavari and
others (1989). MW value for methyl mercury was obtained from U.S. EPA (1997g).
A3.3.2 Melting Point Temperature OTJ
Melting point temperature (Tm) is the temperature of the compound (in degree Kelvin [K]) at which the
solid state of the compound undergoes a phase change to a liquid phase. At ambient temperatures and at an
atmpospheric pressure of 1 atmosphere, compounds are either in a solid or liquid state. The compound
liquid or solid state is provided in the summary tables of compound-specific parameter values.
Oreanics and Metals For most organics (except PCDDs and PCDFs) and metals, this HHRAP provides
values for Tm that were obtained from Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989). Tm values not
provided in Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989) were obtained from Montgomery and
Welkolm(1991).
Because Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989) provides Tm values for most of the compounds
evaluated, it was used as the primary source to ensure consistency. Tm values in Budavari, O'Neil, Smith,
and Heckelman (1989) were generally within 2 to 3 degrees of the values provided in literature sources
reviewed. Tm values for most compounds in the primary guidance documents were also obtained from
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989).
PCDDs and PCDFs Tm values for PCDDs and PCDFs were obtained from U.S. EPA (1994a).
U.S. EPA (1994a) provides Tm values for PCDDs and PCDFs, that were obtained from various literature
sources.
A333
Vapor Pressure (Vp) and Aqueous Solubility (S)
The vapor pressure (Vp) of a substance is defined as the pressure hi atmospheres exerted by the vapor (gas)
of a compound when it is under equilibrium conditions. It provides a semi-quantitative rate at which it will
volatilize from soil and/or water. The aqueous solubility (S) of a compound is defined as the saturated
concentration of the compound in water (mg COPC/L water) at a given temperature and pressure, usually
at soil/water temperatures and atmospheric pressure (Montgomery and Welkom 1991).
Oreanics For most organics (except PCDDs and PCDFs), values for Vp and S were obtained from the
following:
• U.S. EPA 1994c. Draft Report Chemical Properties for Soil Screening Levels. Prepared
for the Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. Washington, DC. July 26.
U.S. EPA (1994c) provides measured, calculated, and estimated values for Vp and S that were obtained
from various literature sources. Vp values in U.S. EPA (1994c) were generally either measured (at 20°C
to 25 °C) or calculated values obtained from various literature sources. U.S. EPA (1994c), however,
provides values for Vp corrected to 25°C. U.S. EPA (1995b) states that, because the distribution of many
of the parameters is skewed, the geometric mean or the median values were preferable to the arithmetic
mean values. Therefore, when available geometric mean values were preferred over the arithmetic mean
values. The geometric mean of the temperature corrected Vp values, determined from measured and
calculated values, is recommended for use in this HHRAP.
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-4
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3 __^
July 1998
In U.S. EPA (1994c), lvalues were either measured (at 20°C to 30°C) or calculated values obtained from
various literature sources. The geometric mean S value, calculated from measured and calculated values, is
recommended for use in this HHRAP. Although S values were measured at temperatures ranging from
20°C to 30°C, U.S. EPA (1994c) states that S values were not corrected to 25°C, because the variability in
solubilities measured at 20°C to 25°C was within the overall range of measured values.
U.S. EPA (1994c) is the preferred source, because (1) sources and the conditions at which each value was
obtained are provided, and (2) values were provided to 2 significant figures. Also, U.S. EPA (1994c)
provides multiple Vp and S values for each compound from several different literature sources; providing a
recent, more comprehensive compilation of reported literature values, Vp and S values from U.S. EPA
(1994c) were generally consistent with those provided in U.S. EPA (1994f), U.S. EPA (1995b) and NC
DEHNR(1997).
When Vp and S values were not available in U.S. EPA (1994c), they were obtained from one of three
sources, in the following order of preference:
1.
2.
U.S. EPA (1994f)
U.S. EPA (1995b); values from which were obtained from one of three sources:
a.
c.
Mackay, D., W.Y. Shiu, and K.C. Ma. 1992. Illustrated Handbook of
Physical-Chemical Properties and Environmental fate for Organic Chemicals.
Volume I - Monoaromatic Hydrocarbons, Chlorobenzenes, and PCBs.
Volume II-Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons, PolychlorinatedDioxins and
Dibenzofiirans. Volume III - Volatile Organic Chemicals, Lewis Publishers.
Boca Raton, Florida.
Howard, P.H. 1989-1993. Handbook of Environmental Fate and Exposure
Data For Organic Chemicals. Volumes I: Large Production and Priority
Pollutants (1989). Volume II: Solvents (1990). Volume III: Pesticides (1991).
Volume IV: Solvents2 (1993). Lewis Publishers. Chelsea, Michigan.
Other referenced literature sources, when values were not available in Mackay,
Shiu, and Ma (1992) or Howard (1989-1993).
3.
U.S. EPA. 1994b. Superfand Chemical Data Matrix (SCDM). Office of Emergency and
Remedial Response. Washington, DC. June.
Vp and S values in U.S. EPA (1994f) were geometric mean values obtained from various literature sources.
References specific to sources of values for each compound were provided hi U.S. EPA (1994f) and were,
therefore, preferred over U.S. EPA (1995b) values.
Most Vp and S values in U.S. EPA (1995b) were obtained from Mackay, Shiu, and Ma (1992) or Howard
(1989-1993). Mackay, Shiu, and Ma (1992) and Howard (1989-1993) obtain the "best" values after
evaluation of various literature sources.
Vp values in U.S. EPA (1994b) were obtained from various literature sources. S values in U.S. EPA
(1994b) were the geometric mean of values obtained from various literature sources.
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-5
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
PCDDs andPCDFs Vp and 5 values for PCDDs and PCDFs were obtained from U.S. EPA (1994a). Vp
and S values were either (1) measured, or (2) estimated by using the homologue (compound class with the
same amount of chlorination) average method.
NOTE: The phase—solid or liquid—of Vp values for all organics, including PCDDs and
PCDFs, was indicated. This is based on whether the compound is in the solid or
liquid phase at ambient soil temperatures.
Metals As cited hi the primary guidance documents and hi the literature, metals—except mercury—are
considered (1) nonvolatile at ambient temperatures, and (2) insoluble in water, except as certain weak
acids. Therefore, Vp and S values were not available for all metals (except mercury) in any of the literature
sources reviewed.
Mercuric Compounds Mercury is a relatively volatile compound. Vp and S values for elemental mercury
were obtained from Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989); and are comparable to the values in
the primary guidance documents. Vp and S values for mercuric chloride were obtained from U.S. EPA
(1997g) and Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989), respectively. Vp and S values for methyl
mercury were not found in the literature.
A3.3.4
Henry's Law Constant (H)
Henry's Law constant (H) is also referred to as the air-water partition coefficient, and is defined as the
ratio of the partial pressure of a compound in air to the concentation of the compound in water at a given
temperature under equilibrium conditions. Henry's Law constant values generally can be (1) calculated
from the theoretical equation defining the constant, (2) measured, or (3) estimated from the compound
structure. Experimental and estimated lvalues from literature reports, however, are (l)very
temperature-dependent and difficult to measure, (2) generally obtained from various literature sources that
use different experimental and estimation methods, and (3) available for only a limited number of
compounds.
Organics For organics (excluding PCDDs and PCDFs), lvalues were calculated from the following
theoretical equation (Lyman, Reehl, and Rosenblast 1982) for consistency, using recommended MW, S, and
Vp values provided in this HHRAP:
= Vp - MW
S
Equation A3-1
H
Vp
S
Henry's Law constant (atm-m3/mole)
Vapor pressure of COPC (atm)
Solubility of COPC hi water (mg COPC/L water)
The primary guidance documents also used theoretical Equation A-3-1 to calculate H values.
PCDDs andPCDFs lvalues for PCDDs and PCDFs are calculated values obtained from U.S. EPA
(1994a).
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-6
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
Metals For all metals (except mercury), His zero, because Vp—because of the nonvolatile nature of the
metals—and S are assumed to be zero. .
Mercuric Compounds Hvalues for elemental mercury, mercuric chloride, and methyl mercury were
obtained from U.S. EPA (1997g).
Diffiisivity of COPCs in Air (DJ and Water (Dw
A3.3.5
Diffusivuy or diffusion coefficients in air (Da) and water (Dw) are used to calculate the liquid or gas phase
transfer of a COPC into a waterbody.
Oreanics For organics (except PCDDs and PCDFs), diffusivity values were obtained directly from the
CHEMDAT8 model chemical properties database (Worksheet DATATWO.WK1):
• U.S. EPA. 1994d. CHEM8—Compound Properties Estimation and Data. Version 1.00.
CHEMDAT8 Air Emissions Program. Prepared for Chemicals and Petroleum Branch,
OAQPS. Research Triangle Park. North Carolina. November 18.
The U.S. EPA (1994d) database uses empirical correlations with compound density and molecular weight
to calculate diffusivity values. For compounds not in the U.S. EPA (1994d) database, diffusivity values
were obtained by using the WATERS model correlation equations for air and water diffusivities:
• U.S. EPA. 1995d. WATERS—Air Emissions Models Wastewater Treatment.
Version 4.0. OAQPS. Research Triangle Park. North Carolina. May 1.
U.S. EPA(1995d) database values were predicted by using chemical-structural relationships. Difiusivity
values for all compounds in the U.S. EPA (1994d) and (1995d) databases were either predicted or
estimated. The primary guidance documents also recommended U.S. EPA (1994d) and (1995d) database
model values. More recent documents, including the following, also recommended these values:
• U.S. EPA. 1996. Soil Screening Guidance: Technical Background Document and
User's Guide. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Washington, DC.
EPA/540/R-95/128. May.
For diffusivity values that were not available in these databases, T)w and Da values were calculated using
the following equations cited and recommended for use in U.S. EPA (1997g):
1.9
Equation A3-2a
22x10
-5
Equation A3-2b
U.S. EPA (1995b) recommended the use of standard default diffusivity values. U.S. EPA (1995b) stated
that the diffusivity parameters vary slightly, and default values appear to be within the range of typical
values. Values for diffusivity in air range from about 0.01 to 0.1 square centimeters per second (cm2/s);
U.S. EPA Region 6 U.S. EPA
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division Office of Solid Waste
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering A-3-7
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
therefore, U.S. EPA (1995b) recommended a defeult value of 0.08 cm2/s. Values for diffusivity in water
range from 1 x lO"06 to 1 x lO"05 cm2/s; therefore, U.S. EPA (1995b) recommended a defeult value of
8 x 10106 cm2/s. Diffusivity values calculated using Equations A-3-2a and A-3-2b were within the range
specified by U.S. EPA (1995b), and therefore, were adopted for use in this HHRAP.
PCDDs and PCDFs Diffusivity values in air and water for (1) 2,3,7,8-TCDD were obtained from
U.S. EPA (1994e), and (2) 2,3,7,8-TCDF were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995d). For all other congeners
of PCDDs and PCDFs, (1) a default Dw value of 8 x lO"06 cm2/s was used, and (2) Da values were
calculated using the following equation recommended by U.S. EPA (1994a):
D
Equation A3-2c
where
Dyy = Diffusivities in air of compounds x and y(cm2/s)
MWxy = Molecular weights of compounds x and y (g/mol)
Da values for PCDD congeners were calculated by using the Da value and MW for 2,3,7,8-TCDD. Da
values for PCDF congeners were calculated using the Da value and MfFfor 2,3,7,8-TCDF. This approach
is consistent with the methodology specified in U.S. EPA (1994a).
Metals and Mercuric compounds For metals (except chromium and mercury), diffusivity values were not
available in the literature. Diffusivity values for chromium and mercury were obtained from the U.S. EPA
(1994d) database. Diffusivity values for mercuric chloride and methyl mercury were calculated using
Equations A-3-2a and A-3-2b.
Octanol/Water Partitioning Coefficient (Kow)
A3.3.6
The n-octanol/water partitioning coefficient (K^ is defined as the ratio of the solute concentration in the
water-saturated w-octanol phase to the solute concentration in the w-octanol-saturated water phase
(Montgomery and Welkom 1991).
Qnfanlcs For organics (except PCDDs and PCDFs), K^ values were obtained from U.S. EPA (1994c).
U.S. EPA (1994c) provides measured, calculated, and estimated Km values obtained from various
literature sources. The geometric mean K^ value, calculated from all measured and calculated values for
each compound, is recommended in this HHRAP.
Km values that were not available in U.S. EPA (1994c) were obtained from one of three sources, in the
following order of preference:
1. U.S.EPA(1994f)
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-8
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
2. Karickhoff, S.W. and J.M. Long. 1995. "Internal Report on Summary of Measured,
Calculated, and Recommended Log K,,w Values." Environmental Research Laboratory.
Athens. April 10.
3. U.S. EPA (1995b), values from which were obtained from one of three sources:
a.
c.
Mackay, D., W.Y. Shiu, and K.C. Ma. 1992. Illustrated Handbook of
Physical-Chemical Properties and Environmental Fate for Organic Chemicals.
Volume I - Monoaromatic Hydrocarbons, Chlorobenzenes, andPCBs.
Volume II - Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Polychlorinated Dioxins and
Dibenzofurans. Volume III- Volatile Organic Chemicals. Lewis Publishers.
Boca Raton, Florida.
Howard, P.H. 1989-1993. Handbook of Environmental Fate and Exposure
Data For Organic Chemicals. Volumes!: Large Production and Priority
Pollutants (1989). Volume II: Solvents (1990). Volume HI: Pesticides (1991).
Volume IV: Solvents2 (1993). Lewis Publishers. Chelsea, Michigan.
Other literature sources, when values were not available in Mackay, Shiu, and
Ma (1992) and Howard (1989-1993).
U.S. EPA (1994c) is the preferred source of values because (1) sources were provided, (2) several
literature values were provided, some of which are also cited by the primary guidance documents and
Karickhoff and Long (1995), and (3) the values were provided to 2 significant figures.
U.S. EPA (1994f) is the second-choice source of Km values recommended; and provides geometric mean
values obtained from various literature sources. Karickhoff and Long (1995) recommended arithmetic
mean values obtained from various literature sources and was, therefore, preferred as the third-choice
source of K^ values when values were not available from the first two sources.
In order to reference specific sources of Km values for each compound, values from U.S. EPA (1995b) and
NC DEHNR (1997) were used only when values were not available in the literature sources reviewed.
PCDDs andPCDFs K^ values for the PCDDs and PCDFs were obtained from either U.S. EPA (1994a)
or US. EPA (1992d). U.S. EPA (1994a) and U.S. EPA (1992d) provide K^ values for PCDDs and
PCDFs that were either measured values obtained from the literature or calculated by averaging the
literature values within the homologue group. According to U.S. EPA (1994a), K^ values for
hexacMorodibenzofurans were not available in the literature. Therefore, as recommended in U.S. EPA
(1994a), due to lack of data, homologue group average values for hexachlorodibenzodioxins were applied
to hexachlorodibenzofurans.
Metals No Km values were available for metals, either in the literature or in the primary guidance
documents. K^ values for the metals were assumed to be zero, because the affinity of the metals to the
octanol is almost zero.
Mercuric compounds No K^ values were available in the literature for mercury and methyl mercury. For
mercuric chloride, the K^ value was obtained from U.S. EPA (1997g).
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-9
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
AoDendix A-3
July 1998
A3.3.7
Soil Organic Carbon-Water Partition Coefficient (Km)
The soil organic carbon-water partition coefficient (KK) or the organic carbon normalized soil sorption
coefficient is defined as the ratio of adsorbed compound per unit weight of organic carbon to the aqueous
solute concentration (Montgomery and Welkom 1991).
Qrsanics Because of the soil mechanisms that are inherently involved, Koc values for the ionizing organics
and nonionizing organics are discussed separately.
A3.3.7.1
Ionizing Organic Compounds
Ionizing organic compounds include amines, carboxylic acids, and phenols. These compounds contain the
functional groups that ionize under specific pH conditions, and include the following:
• Organic acids (2,4,6-trichlorophenol; pentachlorophenol; 2,3,4,5-tetrachlorophenol;
2,3,4,6-tetrachlorophenol; 2,4,5-trichlorophenol; 2,4-dichlorophenol; 2-chlorophenol;
phenol; 2,4-dimethylphenol; 2-methylphenol; 2,4-dinitrophenol; and benzoic acid)
• Organic bases—n-nitroso-di-n-propylamine; n-nitrosodiphenylamine, and 4-chloroaniline)
KK values for ionizing organic compounds were obtained from U.S. EPA (1994c). U.S. EPA (1994c)
provides K^ values for the ionizing organic compounds that have been estimated on the basis of the degree
of ionization and the relative proportions of neutral and ionized species. The primary guidance documents
cite one value for the ionizing organics, independent of the pH. The primary guidance documents calculate
Kx values for the ionizing organics by using correlation equations containing^, that are applicable to
nonionizing organics. However, K^ values for ionizing compounds can vary vastly, depending on the pH
conditions in the environment Therefore, for the aforementioned ionizing organic compounds, this
HHRAP prefers and provides estimated Koc values that are based on pH.
KK values were estimated on the basis of the assumption that the sorption of ionizing organic compounds is
similar to hydrophobic organic sorption, because the soil organic carbon is the dominant sorbent.
According to U.S. EPA (1994c), for low pH conditions, these estimated values may overpredict sorption
coefficients, because they ignore sorption to components other than organic carbon.
A3.3.7.2
Nonionizing Organic Compounds
Nonionizing organic compounds are all other organic compounds not listed earlier as ionizing. They
include volatile organics, chlorinated pesticides, polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and
phthalates. This HHRAP uses geometric mean of measured K^ values provided in the following document:
• U.S. EPA. 1996b. Soil Screening Guidance: Technical Background Document and
User's Guide. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Washington, DC.
EPA/540/R-95/128. May.
U.S. EPA (1996b) calculated the geometric mean value from various measured values. For compounds for
which KK values are not provided by U.S. EPA (1996b), Kx values were calculated using Km correlation
equations provided in the same document.
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-10
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
NC DEHNR (1997) and U.S. EPA (1994f) use the following correlation equation to calculate Km from Km
for all organics: °°
log Koc = 0.88 (log KJ + 0.114 (r2 = 0.96)
Equation A-3-3
Research Triangle Institute (RTI). 1992. Preliminary Soil Action Level for Superfimd
Sites, Draft Interim Report. Prepared for U.S. EPA Hazardous Site Control Division,
Remedial Operations Guidance Branch. Arlington, Virginia. December.
However, according to U.S. EPA (1994c), the correlation between Km and Km can be improved
considerably by performing separate linear regressions on two chemical groups. U.S. EPA (1994c) derives
the following correlation equations from measured K^ values cited in U.S. EPA (1994c) and U.S. EPA
For phthalates andPAHs
log Koc = 0.97 Gog KJ - 0.094 (r2 = 0.99)
Equation A-3-4
For all organics except phthalates, PAHs, PCDDs, andPCDFs
log Koc = 0.78 (log KJ + 0.151
r2 = 0.98
Equation A-3-5
Because of the improved regressions (r2), U.S. EPA (1994c) recommended that correlation
Equations A-3-4 and A-3-5 be used instead of correlation Equation A-3-3. U.S. EPA (1995b) also
recommended that correlation Equations A-3-4 and A-3-5 be used.
Although U.S. EPA (1995b) recommended the use of correlation Equations A-3-4 and A-3-5, the following
correlation equation was used by that document to calculate KM values for all organics except PCDDs and
PCDFs:
log KM = 0.983 (log KJ + 0.0002
Equation A-3-6
DiToro, D.M., C.S. Zarba, DJ. Hansen, W.J. Berry, R.C. Swartz, C.E. Cowan, S.P.
Pavlou, H.E. AUen, N.A. Thomas, and P.R. Paquin. 1991. "Technical Basis for
Establishing Sediment Quality Criteria for Nonionic Compounds Using Equilibrium
Partitioning." Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 10:1541-1583
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-11
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
For the purposes of this HHRAP, values obtained by using correlation Equations A-3-3 through A-3-6,
were compared. In general, more of the Koc values obtained by using correlation Equations A-3-4 and
A-3-5 were within the range of measured values in the literature than those obtained by using correlation
Equations A-3-3 and A-3-6. Therefore, when measured KK values were not available, values were
estimated, for all nonionizing organic compounds except PCDDs and PCDFs, by using the appropriate
correlation Equation A-3-4 or A-3-5.
PCDDs and PCDFs For PCDDs and PCDFs, the following correlation equation (Karickhoff, Brown, and
Scott 1979) was used to calculate Km values, as cited by U.S. EPA (1994a).
log K= log
(« = 10, r2 = 1.0)
Equation A-3-7
• Karickhoff, S.W., D.S. Brown, and T.A. Scott. 1979. "Sorption of Hydrophobic
Pollutants on Natural Sediments." Water Resources. 13:241-248.
Metals For metals, no KM values were found hi the literature. Koc values for metals were not provided in
the primary guidance documents, because of the stated assumption that organic carbon hi soils does not
play a major role in partitioning in soil and sediments. For metals, soil/sediment-water partitioning
coefficients (Kd) were obtained directly from experimental measurements (see Kd discussion).
Note:
For compounds in which a K^ correlation equation was used to calculate
value, KW values recommended for each compound hi this HHRAP were used.
Partitioning Coefficients for Soil-Water (Kdfs), Suspended Sediment-Surface Water
), and Bottom Sediment-Sediment Pore Water
A3.3.8
Partition coefficients (Kd) describe the partitioning of a compound between sorbing material, such as soil,
soil pore-water, surface water, suspended solids, and bed sediments. For organic compounds, Kdhas been
estimated to be a function of the organic-carbon partition coefficient and the fraction of organic carbon hi
the partitioning media. For metals, Kd is assumed to be independent of the organic carbon hi the
partitioning media and, therefore, partitioning is similar hi all sorbing media.
The soil-water partition coefficient (Kds) describes the partitioning of a compound between soil pore-water
and soil particles, and strongly influences the release and movement of a compound into the subsurface
soils and underlying aquifer. The suspended sediment-surface water partition coefficient (Kdm) coefficient
describes the partitioning of a compound between surface water and suspended solids or sediments. The
bed sediment-sediment pore-water partition coefficient (Key coefficient describes the partitioning of a
compound between the bed sediments and bed sediment pore-water.
Qrfonics For organics (including PCDDs and PCDFs), soil organic carbon is assumed to be the dominant
sorbing component hi soils and sediments. Therefore, Kd values were calculated using the following
fraction organic carbon (fo^ correlation equations:
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-12
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
= fo
oc,s
K
K
Equation A-3-8a
Equation A-3-85
Equation A-3-8c
• U.S. EPA. 1993d. Review Draft Addendum to the Methodology for Assessing Health
Risks Associated with Indirect Exposure to Combustor Emissions. Office of Health and
Environmental Assessment. Office of Research and Development EPA-600-AP-93-003.
November 10.
U.S. EPA (1993d), from literature searches, states that^c could range as follows:
• 0.002 to 0.024 in soils—for which a mid-range value of/^5 = 0.01 generally can be used.
• 0.05 to 0.1 in suspended sediments—for which a mid-range value of^ w = 0.075
generally can be used.
• 0.03 to 0.05 in bottom sediments—for which a mid-range value offOCibs =0.04 generally
can be used.
Consistent with the primary guidance documents, this HHRAP uses mid-range^ values recommended by
U.S. EPA (1993d). Kd values were calculated using Kx values recommended for each compound in this
HHRAP.
Metals For metals (except mercury), Kd is governed by factors other than organic carbon, such as pH,
redox, iron content, cation exchange capacity, and ion-chemistry. Therefore, Kd values for metals cannot
be calculated using the same correlation equations specified for organic compounds. Instead, &/values for
the metals must be obtained directly from literature sources. Kd values for all metals, except lead, were
obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b). U.S. EPA (1996b) provides values for Kd that are based on pH, and are
estimated by using the MINTEQ2 model, which is a geochemical speciation model. The MINTEQ2 model
analyses were conducted under a variety of geochemical conditions and metal concentrations. The
MINTEQ2 pH-dependent Kd values were estimated by holding constant the iron oxide at a medium value
and the/;,, at 0.002. For arsenic, hexavalent chromium, selenium, and thallium, empirical pH-dependent
Kd values were used.
U.S. EPA (1995b) also recommended Kd values estimated using the MINTEQ2 model. U.S. EPA (1994f)
and NC DEHNR (1997) provided Kd values obtained from several literature sources, depending on the
compound; however, the Kd values are identical in all of the primary guidance documents.
The MINTEQ2 model values in U.S. EPA (1996b) were comparable to the values in the primary guidance
documents. In addition, because organic carbon does not play a major role in partitioning for the metals,
U.S. EPA (1994f) assumed that the partitioning is the same, regardless of the soil, suspended sediment, or
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-13
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
bottom sediment phase. Therefore, in this HHRAP, values for partitioning coefficients Kds, Kd^, and Kdh
for the metals are assumed to be the same.
Kd value for lead was obtained from the following:
Baes, C.F., R.D. Sharp, AX. Sjoreen, and R.W. Shor. 1984. "Review and Analysis of
Parameters and Assessing Transport of Environmentally Released Radionuclides Through
Agriculture." Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
Mercuric Compounds Kda Kd^ and Kd^ values for mercury, mercuric chloride, and methyl mercury
were obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b). Kd values for mercuric chloride and methyl mercury were obtained
from U.S. EPA (1997g).
A3.3.9
Soil Loss Constant Due to Degradation (ksg)
Soil loss constant due to degradation (ksg) reflects loss of a compound from the soil by processes other
than leaching. Degradation rates in the soil media include biotic and abiotic mechanisms of transformation.
Abiotic degradation includes photolysis, hydrolysis, and redox reactions. Hydrolysis and redox reactions
can be significant abiotic mechanisms in soil (U.S. EPA 1990).
The following document states that degradation rates can be assumed to follow first order kinetics in a
homogenous media:
Lyman, W. J., W.F. Reehl, and D.H. Rosenblatt. 1982. Handbook of Chemical Property
Estimation Methods: Environmental Behavior of Organic Compounds. McGraw-Hill
Book Company. New York, New York.
Therefore, the half-life (tK) of compounds can be related to the degradation rate constant (ksg) as follows:
ksg =
0.693
Equation A-3-9
Ideally, ksg is the sum of all biotic and abiotic rate constants in the soil. Therefore, if the t% for all of the
mechanisms of transformation are known, the degradation rate can be calculated using Equation A-3-9.
However, literature sources generally do not provide sufficient data for all such mechanisms, especially for
soil.
Qreanics For organics (except PCDDs and PCDFs), ksg values were calculated using half-life soil values
obtained from the following document:
Howard, P.H., Boethling, R.S., Jarvis, W.F., Meylan, W.M., and Michalenko, E.M.
1991. Handbook of Environmental Degradation Rates. Lewis Publishers. Chelsea,
Michigan.
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-14
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
Half-life values provided in Howard, Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991) indicate the
disappearance of a substance in ground water or soil; with the principal degradation mechanisms being
biodegradation and hydrolysis. Values reported were highly variable because of the different methods used
for measurements, in addition to the various controlling factors that could affect them. Therefore, Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991) provided a range of half-life values found in the
literature, usually for the fastest reaction mechanism,. Ksg values recommended in this HHRAP were
calculated with me high-end half-life values.
U.S. EPA (1994b) also cited values obtained from Howard, Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko
(1991). NC DEHNR (1997) cited values that are comparable to ksg values calculated by using half-life
values obtained from Howard, Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1 991).
PCDDsandPCDFs For PCDDs and PCDFs, ksg values were calculated from half-life values in soil
obtained from Mackay, Shiu, and Ma (1992). For 2,3,7,8-TCDD, ksg value was obtained from
U.S. EPA (1994a); which discussed experimental studies that were conducted on PCDDs and PCDFs
degradation mechanisms. U.S. EPA (1994a) summarized the degradation bf PCDDs and PCDDs as
follows:
• A few experimental studies have shown possible biological degradation of TCDDs.
However, the studies conclude that microbial action is very slow for PCDDs under
optimum conditions, with the degradation rates probably higher with decreasing
chlorination. PCDFs were found to be extremely stable to biological degradation.
• Abiotic degradation, such as photolysis, appears to be the most significant natural
degradation mechanism for PCDDs and PCDFs. Experimental studies have shown that
PCDDs and PCDFs undergo photolysis in the presence of a suitable hydrogen donor. No
information was available to show that other abiotic degradation mechanisms, such as
oxidation and hydrolysis, are important under environmentally relevant conditions.
Metals For the metals, NC DEHNR (1997) cites ksg values of zero. Literature states that the metals are
transformed, but not degraded, by such mechanisms; therefore, ksg values are not applicable to metals.
Mercuric Compounds For mercury, mercuric chloride, and methylmercury, U.S. EPA (1997g)
recommended ksg values of zero.
A3.3.10 Fraction of Pollutant Air Concentration in the Vapor Phase (Fv)
ics For organics, the fraction of pollutant air concentration in the vapor phase (Fv) was calculated
using the following equation:
Fv = I -
cSr
cST
Equation A-3-10
Junge, C. E. 1977. Fate of Pollutants in the Air and Water Environments, Part I; Suffet,
I. H., Ed.; Wiley; New York. Pages 7-26.
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-15
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
If the compound is a liquid at ambient temperatures (that is, whenp°£ is known), Equation A-3-10
calculates Fv using the vapor pressure value recommended for that compound in this HHRAP. If Hie
compound is a solid at ambient temperatures (that is, whenp°5 is known), the following equation (Bidleman
1988) was used to calculatep°LfromXft for use in Equation A-3-10:
A
- T)
Equation A-3-11
where
c
PL
P\
R
ST
Junge constant = 1.7 x 10"04 (atm-cm)
Liquid phase vapor pressure of compound (atm)
Solid phase vapor pressure of compound (atm)
Universal ideal gas constant (atm-m3/mole'K)
Entropy of fusion [AS//R = 6.79 (unitless)]
Whitby's average surface area of particulates (aerosols)
Ambient air temperature (K)—assumed to be 25°C or 298 K
This equation was adopted from:
• Bidleman, T.F. 1988. "Atmospheric Processes." Environmental Science and
Technology. Volume 22. Number 4. Pages 361-367.
According to Bidleman (1988), Equation A-3-10 assumes that the Junge constant (c) is constant for all
compounds. However, c can depend on (1) the compound (sorbate) molecular weight, (2) the surface
concentration for monolayer coverage, and (3) the difference between the heat of desorption from the
particle surface and the heat of vaporization of the liquid-phase sorbate.
The primary guidance documents used Equations A-3-10 and A-3-11 to compute Fv. However, it is not
clear what values of 5", T, and Vp values were used to calculate values for Fv For example, U.S. EPA
(1994f) calculated Fv values at (7) of ll'C. Because of inconsistencies in the values in the primary
guidance documents, Fv values in the primary guidance documents were not recommended for use in this
HHRAP. Fv values were calculated using the recommended values of Vp and Tm provided hi this HHRAP
for each compound.
Metals Consistent with U.S. EPA (1994f), all metals (except mercury) are assumed to be present in the
paniculate phase and not in the vapor phase (Vp = 0), and assigned Fv values of zero.
Mercuric Compounds Mercury and mercuric chloride are relatively volatile and exist hi the vapor phase
(U.S. EPA 1997g). Therefore, the Fv value recommended hi this HHRAP for mercury was calculated
using Equations A-3-10 and A-3-11.
Based on discussions on mercury presented hi Chapter 2 of this HHRAP, Fv values of 1.0 for mercury
(same as calculated using Equations A-3-10 and A-3-11), and 0.85 for mercuric chloride were estimated.
U.S. EPA Region 6 U.S. EPA
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division Office of Solid Waste
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering A-3-16
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3 - -
July 1998
Consistent with information provided in U.S. EPA (1997g), methyl mercury is assumed not to exist in the
air phase and, therefore, assigned an Fv of zero.
A3.4 BIOCONCENTRATION AND BIOTRANSFER FACTORS FOR PLANTS
A3.4.1 Root Concentration Factor (RCF)
The root concentration factor (RCF) is used to calculate the belowground transfer of compound from soil to
a root vegetable.
Oreanics For organics.the following correlation equation was used to calculate RCF:
log (*CF - 0.82) = 0.77 log JT - 1.52
Equation A-3-12
This equation was obtained from the following document:
• Briggs, G.G., R.H. Bromilow, and A.A. Evans, 1982. "Relationships Between
Lipophilicity and Root Uptake and Translocation of Non-ionized Chemicals by Barley."
Pesticide Science. Volume 1-3. Pages 495-504.
This equation estimates a RCF value in fresh weight (FW) units, which was then converted to dry weight
(DW) units using a moisture content of 87 percent in root vegetables (U.S. EPA 1997h; Pennington 1994).
KM, values recommended in this HHRAP were used to calculate each RCF value.
The primary guidance documents also recommended using correlation Equation A-3-12. U.S. EPA
(1994a) adopted this correlation equation for calculating exposure to dioxin-like compounds.
Metals For metals, no referenced RCF values were available in published literature. However, plant-soil
biotransfer factors for root vegetables (Br^^ were available in the literature and, therefore, RCF values,
which were used to calculate Br values, are not required for the metals.
Mercuric Compounds No RCF values were available for mercury, mercuric chloride, and methyl mercury
in the literature. However, plant-soil biotransfer factors for root vegetables (Br^) were available in
U.S. EPA (1997g) and, therefore, JZCF values, which were used to calculate Br^^vahies, are not
required for the mercuric compounds..
A3.4.2
Plant-Soil Bioconcentration Factors in Root Vegetables (B
The plant-soil bioconcentration factor for compounds in root vegetables (Br^^) accounts for uptake from
soil to the belowground root Vegetables or produce. Discussion on Br^^g values also is provided in
Section A3.4.3.
For organics, the following equation, obtained from U.S. EPA (1995b), was used to calculate
values for Br^rt on a dry weight basis:
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-17
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
Br
rootveg
RCF
Kd.
Equation A-3-13
values were calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, values provided in this HHRAP.
Metals Brroo^ values for metals (except nickel, cadmium, selenium, and arsenic) were obtained from
Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984). Br values in Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984) are dry weight
values provided for nonvegetative (reproductive) growth, such as tubers.
For nickel, cadmium, selenium, and arsenic,
values were obtained from the following document:
• U.S. EPA. 1992b. Technical Support Document for the Land Application of Sewage
Sludge. Volumes I and II. EPA 822/R-93-001a. Office of Water. Washington, D.C.
For nickel, cadmium, selenium, and arsenic—Br^^g values were calculated by multiplying the uptake
slope factors [(ug COPC/g DW plant)/(kg COPC applied/hectare)] for root vegetables by a conversion
factor of 2x109 g/hectare soil. In deriving the conversion factor, U.S. EPA (1992b) assumed a soil average
dry bulk density of 1.33 g/cm3 and a soil incorporation depth of 15 cm.
Mercuric Componds Br^^g values for mercuric chloride and methyl mercury were obtained from
U.S. EPA (1997g) on a dry weight basis. Elemental mercury is assumed not to deposit onto soils; and
therefore, it is assumed that there is no plant uptake through the soil. Therefore, ^Brrootteg value for
elemental mercury is not applicable for this HHRAP.
A3.43 Plant-Soil Bioconcentration Factors for Aboveground Produce (Br^) and
Forage (Br/0nve)
The plant-soil bioconcentration factor (Br) for aboveground produce accounts for the uptake from soil and
the subsequent transport of COPCs through the roots to the aboveground plant parts. As addressed in
U.S. EPA (1995b), the Br value for organics is a function of water solubility, which is inversely
proportional to K^ The Br value for metals is a function of the bioavailability of the compounds in soil.
Primarily, two parameters—Br^ and Brforage—are presented in this Appendix. For all organics including
PCDDs and PCDFs, (1) the subscript "ag" represents aboveground produce which applies to exposed
fruits and vegetables, and protected fruits and vegetables, and (2) the subscript "forage" represents forage,
but the values also apply to silage and grain. For metals, (1) aboveground fruits (both exposed and
protected) are represented byBr^,^; (2) aboveground vegetables (both exposed and protected) are
represented by Brag(l>es), (3) forage is represented by Brforage, but the values also apply to silage, and
(4) grains are represented by Brgrcan.
The U.S. EPA (1995b) and NC DEHNR (1997) guidance documents provided' two parameters—Br^^,veg
and Br^ngf. The subscript "leafy veg" represents leafy vegetables and "forage" represents forage, silage,
and grain. U.S. EPA (1994f) provides only one Br value for each COPC and does not provide a distinction
between leafy vegetables or aboveground produce, forage, and root vegetables.
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-18
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
Organics For organics, the following correlation equations were used to calculate values for Bra, and
on a dry weight basis:
' ag>
log Brag = 1.588 - 0.578 (log KJ (n = 29, r = 0.73) Equation A.3.14a
log Brforage = 1-588 - 0.578 (log KJ (n = 29, r = 0.73) Equation A-3-14b
These correlation equations were obtained from;
• Travis, C.C. and A.D. Arms. 1988. Bioconcentration of Organics in Beef, Milk, and
Vegetation. Environmental Science and Technology. 22:271-274.
Travis and Arms (1988) developed a correlation equation for vegetation and does not distinguish between
aboveground produce and forage or silage or grain. Due to lack of literature data, the Travis and Arms
(1988) correlation equation was used to calculate Br values for both aboveground produce and forage. The
Km value recommended for each organic compound in this HHRAP was used.
This approach is consistent with that used in the primary guidance documents. However, it should be noted
that the Travis and Arms (1988) correlation equations were derived from experiments conducted on
compound classes such as DDT, pesticides, PCDDs, PCDFs, and PCBs. Therefore, further research is
needed to evaluate the applicability and limitations associated with the use of such correlation equations to
all classes of compounds.
For metals— nickel, cadmium, selenium, zinc, and arsenic— Br values were derived from uptake
slope factors provided in the following document:
• U.S. EPA. I992b. Technical Support Document for the Land Application of Sewage
Sludge. Volumes I and II. EPA 822/R-93-001a. Office of Water. Washington, DC.
Uptake slopes provided in U.S. EPA (1992b) are the ratio of COPC concentration in dry weight plant
tissue to the mass of COPC applied per hectare soil. These uptake slopes were multiplied by 2 x 109
g/hectare soil to convert to Br values. The conversion factor was derived using the U.S. EPA (1992b)
assumed soil bulk density of 1 .33 g/cm3, and incorporation depth of 1 5 cm.
For the remaining metals (excluding mercury), Br values were obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and
Shor (1984). Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984) described biotransfer factors (on a dry weight basis)
from plant-soil uptake for (1) vegetative growth (leaves and stems) "Bv"; and (2) nonvegetative or
reproductive growth (fruits, seeds, and tubers) "Br". Note that Bv is defined in this HHRAP as the
air-to-plant biotransfer factor.
This HHRAP uses the following methodology to derive Br values on a dry weight basis:
a. For nickel, cadmium, selenium, zinc, and arsenic, Brag q^ values were calculated
by multiplying the uptake slope factors with a conversion factor of 2 xlO9 g/ha
soil. The uptake slope factor and the conversion factor were obtained from U.S.
U.S. EPA Region 6 yg gp. — •
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division Office of Solid Waste
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering A-3-19
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
EPA (1992b) for garden fruits. For all other metals, "Br" values for
nonvegetative growth (reproductive) provided in Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor
(1984) were used for 5r values.
b.
For nickel, cadmium, selenium, zinc, and arsenic, Br^ ^ values were calculated
by weighting the uptake slope factors for garden fruits (75%) and leafy vegetables
(25%) and multiplying the result with a conversion factor of 2 xlO9 g/ha soil. The
uptake slope factors and the conversion factor were obtained from U.S. EPA
(1992b). For all other metals, "Br" values for nonvegetative (reproductive)
growth and "Bv" values for vegetative growth— obtained from Baes, Sharp,
Sjoreen, and Shor (1984)— were weighted as 75% (reproductive) and 25%
vegetative. The resulting values were adopted as 5r values.
For nickel, cadmium, selenium, zinc, and arsenic, Brforage values were calculated by
multiplying the uptake slope factors with a conversion factor of 2 xlO9 g/ha soil.
The uptake slope factors and the conversion factor were obtained from U.S. EPA
(1992b) for leafy vegetables. Br^^ values were obtained from Baes, Sharp,
Sjoreen, and Shor (1984). "Bv" values for vegetative growth (such as leaves and
stems) in Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984) were used for Brforage.
For nickel, cadmium, selenium, zinc, and arsenic, Brffala values were calculated by
multiplying the uptake slope factors with a conversion factor of 2 xlO9 g/ha soil.
The uptake slope factors and the conversion factor were obtained from U.S. EPA
(1992b) for grains/cereals. Br^ value was obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen,
and Shor (1984). "Br" values for nonvegetative growth as recommended by Baes,
Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984) were used for Br
The primary guidance documents used the following methodology to obtain Br values for metals:
1 . U.S. EPA (1994f) provided only one Br value and did not distinguish between leafy
vegetables or aboveground produce, forage, and root vegetables.
2. U.S. EPA (1995b) used:
a. "Bv" values in Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984), provided for vegetative
growth, were used for Br,^^ values for antimony, barium, beryllium, copper,
chromium, lead, molybdenum, silver, thallium, and vanadium.
b. "Bv" values in Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984), provided for vegetative
growth, were used for Brforage values for antimony, barium, beryllium, chromium,
lead, silver, thallium, and vanadium.
c. "Br" values in Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984), provided for nonvegetative
growth, were used for Br^,,^ values for antimony, barium, beryllium, copper,
chromium, lead, molybdenum, silver, thallium, and vanadium.
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-20
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
All other Values were obtained from plant uptake response slope feetors calculated from
field data (e.g., metal loading rates and soil metal concentrations) contained in various
literature sources.
3. NCDEHNR(1997): .
a.
Uses "Bv" values in Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984), provided for
vegetative growth, for 'Brle<^veg and Brforage values. NCDEHNR (1997) does not
differentiate between forage and leafy vegetables (aboveground produce).
b. Brnotveg values were not available.
Mercuric Compounds Br^ and Brforage values on a dry weight basis for mercuric chloride and methyl
mercury were obtained from U.S. EPA (1997g). Elemental mercury is assumed not to deposit onto soils.
Therefore, it is assumed that there is no plant uptake through the soil. This is based on the assumptions
made regarding speciation and fate and transport of mercury from stack emissions (see Chapter 2).
If field data suggests otherwise, the same methodology that was used to derive Br values from Baes, Sharp,
Sjoreen, and Shor (1984) data could be used for elemental mercury. However, for purposes of this
HHRAP, it should be noted that uptake of mercury from air into the aboveground plant tissue is assumed
to primarily consist of the divalent form of mercury. Therefore, a Br value for the aboveground plant parts
for elemental mercury is not applicable for this HHRAP.
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
•' A-3-21
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
A3.4.4 Air-to-Plant Biotransfer Factors for Aboveground Produce (Bv^) and
Forage (BvfartgJ
The air-to-plant biotransfer factor (Bv) is defined as the ratio of COPC concentration in aboveground plant
parts to the COPC concentration in air. J5v values for all organics and metals, were calculated only for
aboveground exposed produce (both fruits and vegetables). For this HHRAP, aboveground protected
produce (both fruits and vegetables) and belowground produce were assumed to be protected from
air-to-plant transfer. According to U.S. EPA (1995b), root vegetables are assumed to be also protected
from air-to-plant transfer.
Qrponics For organics (excluding PCDDs and PCDFs), the air-to-plant biotransfer factor for
aboveground produce (Bv^) and forage (Bvforage) were calculated using correlation equations derived for
azalea leaves in the following documents:
• Bacci E., D. Calamari, C. Gaggi, and M. Vighi. 1990. "Bioconcentration of Organic
Chemical Vapors in Plant Leaves: Experimental Measurements and Correlation."
Environmental Science and Technology. Volume 24. Number 6. Pages 885-889.
• Bacci E., M. Cerejeira, C. Gaggi, G. Chemello, D. Calamari, and M. Vighi. 1992.
"Chlorinated Dioxins: Volatilization from Soils and Bioconcentration in Plant Leaves."
Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. Volume 48. Pages 401-408.
Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi, Chemelo, Calamari, and Vighi (1992) developed a correlation equation by using
data collected for the uptake of 1,2,3,4-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) hi azalea leaves, and data
obtained from Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990). The Bv obtained was then evaluated for 14
organic compounds to develop a correlation equation with K^ and H. Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi, Chemello,
Calamari, and Vighi (1992) derived the following equations without distinguishing between forage and
aboveground produce:
log
= 1.065 log Km - log () - 1.654 (r = 0.957)
Equation A-3-15a
where
Bv =
B.
vol
^ J water' Pforage
Equation A-3-15b
Bv
Pair
Pjbragt
fvatar
Volumetric air-to-plant biotransfer fector (fresh-weight basis)
Mass-based air-to-plant biotransfer factor (dry-weight basis)
1.19 g/L (Weast 1981)
770 g/L (Macrady and Maggard 1993)
0.85 (fraction of forage that is water—Macrady and Maggard [1993])
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-22
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
Equations A-3-13 and A-3-14 were used to calculate Bv values using the recommended values of H and
KM, provided in this HHRAP for a T of 25 °C or 298.1 K. The resulting Bv values were adopted for both
forage (Bvforage) and aboveground produce (Bvag). The primary guidance documents also used Equations
A-3-13 and A-3-14 to calculate Bv values. The following uncertainty should be noted when using these
variables:
• For organics (except PCDDs and PCDFs), U.S. EPA (1993d) recommended that Bv
values be reduced by a factor of 10 before use. This was based on the work conducted by
U.S. EPA (1993d) for U.S. EPA (1994a) as an interim correction factor. Welsch-Pausch,
McLachlan, and Umlauf (1995) conducted experiments to determine concentrations of
PCDDs and PCDFs in air and resulting biotransfer to welsh ray grass. This was
documented in the following:
Welsch-Pausch, K.M. McLachlan, and G. Umlauf. 1995. "Determination of the
Principal Pathways of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins and Dibenzofurans to
Lolium Multiflorum (Welsh Ray Grass)". Environmental Science and
Technology. 29: 1090-1098.
A follow-up study based on Welsch-Pausch, McLachlan, and Umlauf (1995) experiments
was conducted by Lorber (1995) (see discussion below for PCDDs and PCDFs). In a
following publication, Lorber (1997) concluded that the Bacci factor reduced by a factor
of 100 was close in line with observations made by him through various studies, including
the Welsch-Pausch, McLachlan, and Umlauf (1995) experiments. Therefore, for this
HHRAP, Bv values were calculated using the Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi, Chemello,
Calamari, and Vighi (1992) correlation equations and then reduced by a factor of 100 for
all organics, excluding PCDDs and PCDFs.
PCDDs and PCDFs For PCDDs and PCDFs, Bv values, on a dry weight basis, were obtained from the
following:
• Lorber, M. 1995. "Development of an Air-to-plant Vapor Phase Transfer for Dioxins
and Furans. Presented at the 15th International Symposium on Chlorinated Dioxins and
Related Compounds". August 21-25,1995 in Edmonton, Canada. Abstract in
Organohalogen Compounds. 24: 179-186.
U.S. EPA (1993d) stated that, for dioxin-like compounds, the use of the Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi, Chemello,
Calamari, and Vighi (1992) equations may overpredict Bv values by a factor of 40. This was because the
Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990) and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi, Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi
(1992) experiments did not take photodegradation effects into account. Therefore, Bv values calculated
using Equations A-3-13 and A-3-14 were recommended to be reduced by a factor of 40 for dioxin-like
compounds. This procedure was also followed by the primary guidance documents.
However, according to Lorber (1995), the Bacci algorithm divided by 40 may not be appropriate because
(1) the physical and chemical properties of dioxin congeners are generally outside the range of the 14
organic compounds used by Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990), and (2) the factor of 40 derived
from one experiment on 2,3,7,8-TCDD may not apply to all dioxin congeners.
Welsch-Pausch, McLachlan, and Umlauf (1995) conducted experiments to obtain data on uptake of
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-23
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
PCDDs and PCDFs from air to Lolium Multiflorum (Welsh Ray grass). The data includes grass
concentrations and air concentrations for dioxin-congener groups, but not the invidual congeners. Lorber
(1995) used data from Welsch-Pausch, McLachlan, and Umlauf (1995) to develop an air-to-leaf transfer
factor for each dioxin-congener group. Bv values developed by Lorber (1995) were about an order of
magnitude less than values that would have been calculated using the Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi
(1990) and 1992) correlation equations. Lorber (1995) speculated that this difference could be attributed
to several factors including experiraetal design, climate, and lipid content of plant species used.
Br values recommended for PCDDs and PCDFs in this HHRAP were obtained from the experimentally
derived values of Lorber (1995). However, Lorber (1995) stated that these values should be considered
carefully by users of this methodology because of the inherent uncertainties associated with the data.
Metals For metals, no literature sources were found for the Bv values. U.S. EPA (1995b) quoted from the
following document, that metals were assumed not to experience air to leaf transfer:
• Belcher, G.D., and C.C. Travis. 1989. "Modeling Support for the RURA and Municipal
Waste Combustion Projects: Final Report on Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis for the
Terrestrial Food Chain Model." Interagency Agreement No. 1824-A020-A1. Office of
Risk Analysis, Health and Safety Research Division. Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
Oak Ridge, Tennessee. October.
Consistent with the above references, Bv values for metals (excluding elemental mercury) were assumed to
be zero for this HHRAP.
Mercuric Compounds Mercury emissions are assumed to consist of both the elemental and divalent
forms. However, only small amounts of elemental mercury is assumed to be deposited (see Chapter 2).
Elemental mercury either dissipates into the global cycle or is converted to the divalent form. Methyl
mercury is assumed not to exist in the stack emissions or in the air phase. Consistent with various
discussions in Chapter 2 concerning mercury, (1) elemental mercury reaching or depositing onto the plant
surfaces is negligible, and (2) biotransfer of methyl mercury from air is zero. This is based on assumptions
made regarding speciation and fate and transport of mercury from stack emissions. Therefore, the Bv value
for (1) elemental mercury was assumed to be zero, and (2) methyl mercury was assumed not to be
applicable. Bv values for mercuric chloride (dry weight basis) were obtained from U.S. EPA (1997g).
If field data suggests otherwise, Bv values (1) provided in U.S. EPA (1997g) for methyl mercury can be
used and (2) need to be determined for elemental mercury. It should be noted that uptake of mercury from
air into the aboveground plant tissue is primarily in the divalent form. A part of the divalent form of
mercury is assumed to be converted to the methyl mercury form once in the plant tissue.
A3.5
BIOTRANSFER FACTORS FOR ANIMALS
The biotransfer factor for animals (Ba) is the ratio of COPC concentration in fresh weight animal tissue to
the daily intake of COPC by the animal.
A3.5.1
Biotransfer Factors for Beef (Ba^ and Milk (Ba
Organics For organics (except PCDDs and PCDFs), the following correlation equations were used to
calculate biotransfer factors for beef (Ba^ and milk (Bamat) on a fresh weight basis:
U.S. EPA Region 6 U.S. EPA
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division Office of Solid Waste
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering A-3-24
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
log Ba - -7.6 + log
(n = 36, r = 0.81)
Equation A-3-16
log Bamm = -8.1 + log
(« = 28, r = 0.74)
Equation A-3-17
These equations were obtained from Travis and Amis (1988). The primary guidance documents also
recommend the use of the correlation equations from Travis and Arms (1988).
The Km values recommended in this HHRAP were used in correlation Equations A-3-15 and A-3-16 to
calculate .Ba^ and Bamilk values for all organic compounds except PCDDs and PCDFs.
The Travis and Arms (1988) correlation equations were derived from experiments conducted on compound
classes such as DDT, pesticides, PCDDs, PCDFs, and PCBs. As further literature is developed for other
classes of compounds, the Travis and Arms (1988) correlation equations should be evaluated concerning
their applicability to all classes of organic compounds.
PCDDs and PCDFs Sa^and Banllk values on a fresh weight basis for PCDDs and PCDFs were obtained
from:
• U.S. EPA. 1995a. Further Studies for Modeling the Indirect Exposure Impacts from
Combustor Emissions. Memorandum from Mathew Lorber, Exposure Assessment Group,
and Glenn Rice, Indirect Exposure Team, Environmental Criteria and Assessment OfBce.
Washington, DC. January 20.
The Travis and Arms (1988) correlation equations were derived from experiments conducted on compound
classes which included PCDDs and PCDFs. Therefore, it may appear appropriate to use correlation
Equations A-3-15 and A-3-16 to calculate Ba^and BaMk values for PCDDs and PCDFs. However,
literature sources have reported that it is not appropriate to use the Travis and Arms (1988) correlation
equations to calculate beef and milk biotransfer factors for dioxin-like compounds. U.S. EPA (1995a)
discussed the inappropriateness of using the Travis and Arms (1988) correlation equations for dioxin-like
compounds:
• The Travis and Arms (1988) correlation equations overestimate tfa^ and Bamilk values for
dioxin-like compounds, based on the following experimental studies conducted on lactating
cows:
McLachlan, M.S., H. Thoma, M. Reissinger, and O. Hutzinger. 1990.
"PCDD/F in an Agricultural Food Chain. Parti: PCDD/F Mass Balance of a
Lactating Cow." Chemosphere. Volume 20 (Numbers 7-9). Pages 1013-1020.
• Ba values would increase with increasing Km using the Travis and Arms (1988)
correlation equations; whereas, U.S. EPA (1994a) stated that Ba values for compounds
with a log Km from 6.5 to 8.0 (such as the dioxin-like compounds) would actually
decrease with increasing Km. This could be a result of greater rates of metabolism for
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S.EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-25
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
organic compounds of higher K^, or only for the dioxins, leading to lower concentrations
in the animal food products.
milk values generated from the McLachlan, Thoma, Reissinger, and Hutzinger
(1990) experiments were recommended instead of the Travis and Arms (1988) estimated
values. U.S. EPA (1995a) derived Ba values using the McLachlan, Thoma, Reissinger,
and Hutzinger (1990) experimentally derived data. U.S. EPA (l995a) assumed that milk
is 3.5 percent fat and that beef is 19 percent fat. Therefore, Ba^ values would be 5.43
times (19/3.5) higher than for milk with these fat content assumptions.
Values recommended in this HHRAP also assumed that milk is 3.5 percent fet and that beef is 19 percent
fat. Consistent with U.S. EPA (1995a), biotransfer factors for beef would be 5.43 times (25/3.68) higher
than for milk. Therefore, in this HHRAP, Bamilk values for PCDDs and PCDFs were obtained from
U.S. EPA (1995a), and Ba^ values were calculated by increasing Bamttk values by a factor of 5.43.
U.S. EPA (1994f) cited JSa^and Bamllk values obtained through personal communication with Matthew
Lorber, Exposure Assessment Group, Office of Research and Development. These were interim values
intended to represent dioxin TEQs by weighting data for all dioxin and furan congeners with nonzero
toxicity equivalent factors (TEF). U.S. EPA (1995b) stated that the lipophilic nature of PCDDs, PCDFs,
and PCBs causes them to transfer directly to the lipid within the beef and milk rather than adsorb to both
beef muscle and beef fat or, hi the case of milk, milk and milk fat. U.S. EPA (1995b) stated that an
alternative methodology was used to calculate PCB, PCDD, and PCDF concentrations in beef and milk.
Therefore, the beef and milk biotransfer factors concept was not applicable to PCBs, PCDDs, and PCDFs.
Metals For metals (except cadmium, mercury, selenium, and zinc), Bo^and Bamilk values on a fresh
weight basis were obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984). For cadmium, selenium, and zinc,
U.S. EPA (1995a) cited Ba values derived by dividing uptake slopes [(g COPC/kg DW tissue)/(g
COPC/kg DW feed)], obtained from U.S. EPA (1992b), by a daily consumption rate of 20 kg DW per day
for beef and dairy cattle.
All primary guidance documents also obtain Ba values from these sources. Therefore, values presented in
this HHRAP are obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984) for all metals except cadmium,
selenium, and zinc. For cadmium, selenium, and zinc, Ba values were calculated using uptake slope factors
and consumption rates provided in U.S. EPA (1992b) and U.S. EPA (1995a), and converting the result to a
fresh weight basis by assuming a moisture content of 87 percent in milk and 70 percent in beef. Moisture
content in beef and milk were obtained from the following:
U.S. EPA. 1997h. Exposure Factors Handbook. "Food Ingestion Factors"
EPA/600/P-95/002Fb. August.
Volume II.
• Pennington, J.A.T. 1994. Food Value of Portions Commonly Used. Sixteenth Edition.
J.B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia.
The calculated fresh weight Ba^and BamUk values are recommended for use in this HHRAP.
Mercuric Compounds Elemental mercury is assumed to neither deposit onto soils or transfer to the
aboveground plant parts. Therefore, there is no transfer of elemental mercury into animal tissue.
Therefore, Ba values for elemental mercury are reported in this HHRAP as not applicable. This based on
U.S. EPA Region 6 ~~"~ U.S. EPA ~
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division Office of Solid Waste
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering A-3-26
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
assumptions made regarding speciation and fete and transport of mercury from stack emissions (see
Chapter 2).
If field data suggests otherwise, Ba^aad. Bamttk values for elemental mercury can be derived from the
uptake slope factors provided in U.S. EPA (1992b) and U.S. EPA (1995a); using the same consumption
rates discussed earlier for metals like cadmium, selenium, and zinc.
BabetfwA. Bamttk values reported in this HHRAP for mercuric chloride and methyl mercury were derived
from data in U.S. EPA (1997g). U.S. EPA (1997g) provided 5awand Bamilk values for mercury, but did
not specify for which form of mercury. Consistent with U.S. EPA 1997g, mercury is assumed to be
speciate into 87 percent divalent mercury and 13 percent methyl mercury in herbivore animal tissue. Also,
assuming that the Ba^aad Bamilk values provided in U.S. EPA (1997g) were for total mercury in animal '
tissue, then biotransfer factors in U.S. EPA (1997g) can be apportioned in the fractions assumed to be
found in animal tissue. Therefore, values reported in this HHRAP are based on the following:
Default Bamilk value of 0.02 day/kg DW for mercury obtained from U.S. EPA (1997g) was
converted to a fresh weight basis assuming a 87 percent moisture content in milk (U.S.
EPA 1997h; and Pennington 1994). The calculated Bamttk (fresh weight) value was
multiplied by (1) 0.1.3 to obtain a value for methyl mercury, and (2) 0.87 to obtain a value
for mercuric chloride (divalent mercury).
Default Babetf value of 0.02 day/kg DW for mercury obtained from U.S. EPA (1997g) was
converted to a fresh weight basis assuming a 70 percent moisture content in beef (U.S.
EPA 1997h; and Pennington 1994). The calculated £0^ (fresh weight) value was
multiplied by (1) 0.13 to obtain a value for methyl mercury, and (2) 0.87 to obtain a value
for mercuric chloride (divalent mercury).
A3.5.2 Biotransfer Factors for Pork (Bapork)
Organic* For organics (except PCDDs and PCDFs), Bapork values reported in this HHRAP were derived
from Ba^vsdms, assuming that pork is 23 percent fat and beef is 19 percent fat. Therefore, Bapork values
were calculated by multiplying £awvalues by their fat content ratio of 1.2 (23/19). This calculation is
limited by the assumptions that (1) COPCs bioconcentrate in the fat tissues, and (2) there is minimal effect
from differences in metabolism and feeding characteristics between beef cattle and pigs.
PCDDs and PCDFs For PCDDs and PCDFs, Bapork values reported in this HHRAP were calculated using
the same methodology used to obtain Ba^values by U.S. EPA (1995a). Assuming that milk is
3.5 percent fat and that pork is 23 percent fat, biotransfer factors for pork would be 6.57 times (23/3.5)
higher than for milk. Therefore, Ba^ values were calculated by increasing Bamilk values by a factor of
6.57. This has the same effect as if the Ba^ values were calculated by multiplying the Babe^ values with
the fat content ratio of 1.2 (23/19) between pork and beef, as was adopted for the remaining organic
compounds.
Metals For metals (except cadmium, selenium, and zinc),no data was available in the literature to
calculate Ask,,* values.
For cadmium, selenium, and zinc, U.S. EPA (1995b) reported Ba values derived by dividing uptake slopes
[(g COPC/kg DW tissue)/(g COPC/kg DW feed)], obtained from U.S. EPA (1992b), by a daily
U.S. EPA Region 6 —— . US EPA :—~~
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division Office of Solid Waste
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering A-3-27
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
consumption rate of 4.7 kg DW per day for pigs provided in U.S. EPA (1995a). The dry wei
values (for cadmium, selenium, and zinc) were converted to a fiesh weight basis assuming a moisture
content of 70 percent in pork (U.S. EPA 1997h; and Pennington 1994). The calculated fresh weight &v*
values are recommended for use in this HHRAP.
Mercuric Compounds Elemental mercury is assumed not to deposit onto soils or be transferred to the
aboveground plant parts.; therefore, there is no transfer of elemental mercury into the animal tissue.
Therefore, Ba values for elemental mercury are reported in this HHRAP as not applicable. This is based
on the assumptions made regarding speciation and fate and transport of mercury from stack emissions (see
Chapter 2).
If field data suggests otherwise, Ba^ values for elemental mercury can be derived from the uptake slope
factors as provided in U.S. EPA (1992b) and U.S. EPA (1995a), using the same consumption rates
discussed earlier for metals like cadmium, selenium, and zinc.
Bctpa* values reported in this HHRAP for mercuric chloride and methyl mercury were derived from data in
U.S. EPA (1997g). U.S. EPA (1997g) provided Ba^* values for mercury, but did not specify for which
form of mercury. Consistent with U.S. EPA (1997g), mercury is assumed to be speciate into 87 percent
divalent mercury and 13 percent methyl mercury in herbivore animal tissue. Also, assuming that the Ba^*
values provided in U.S. EPA (1997g) were for total mercury in animal tissue, then biotransfer factors in
U.S. EPA (1997g) can be apportioned in the fractions it is assumed to be found in animal tissue.
Therefore, the default Ba^k value reported in this HHRAP of 0.00013 day/kg DW for mercury was
' obtained from U.S. EPA (1997g) and converted to a fresh weight basis assuming a 70 percent moisture
content in pork (U.S. EPA 1997h; and Pennington 1994). The calculated Ba^ (fresh weight) value was
multiplied by (1) 0.13 to obtain a value for methyl mercury, and (2) 0.87 to obtain a value for mercuric
chloride (divalent mercury).
Biotransfer Factors for Chicken (Ba^^) and Poultry Eggs (Ba^)
A3.5.3
Biotransfer factors for chicken (84**,) and poultry eggs (Ba^) are expressed as the ratio of the COPC
concentration in the fresh weight tissue to the COPC intake from the feed. Biotransfer factors are
calculated from bioconcentration factors for chicken and poultry eggs. BCFs are expressed as the ratio of
the COPC concentration in the fresh weight tissue to the COPC concentration in dry weight soil.
The primary guidance documents, except for NC DEHNR (1997) do not evaluate exposure through
chicken and eggs. NC DEHNR (1997) considers the chicken and egg ingestion pathways only for
exposures to PCDDs and PCDFs.
Orcanlcs For organics (except PCDDs and PCDFs), BaehldKn values were derived from Ba^ values by
assuming that chicken is 15 percent fat and beef is 19 percent fat. Therefore, Ba^^, values were
calculated by multiplying Ba^ values by then- fat content ratio of 0.8 (15/19). This calculation is limited
by the assumptions that (1) COPCs bioconcentrate in the fat tissues, and (2) there is minimal effect from
differences in metabolism or feeding characteristics between beef cattle and chickens. Due to the lack of
literature data available onBa^^ values, this methodology has also been followed by various other risk
assessment guidance documents.
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-28
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
Baeggs values were calculated using a correlation equation derived and recommended for use in the
following:
California Environmental Protection Agency (CEPA). 1993. "Parameter Values and
Ranges for CALTOX." Draft. Office of Scientific Affeirs. California Department of
Toxic Substances Control. Sacramento, CA. July.
CEPA (1993) derived the following correlation equation obtained from experimental studies conducted on
PCDDs and PCDFs using fat-soil and fat-diet partitioning factors in chicken and eggs:
log Baeg = -5.1 + log
(n = 64, r2 = 0.61)
Equation A-3-18
The Km values recommended in this HHRAP were used in correlation Equation A-3-18 to calculate Ba
values for all organic compounds (except PCDDs and PCDFs).
PCDDs and PCDFs Ba^u^ and Baeggs values were obtained by multiplying the BCF values for chicken
and eggs for PCDDs and PCDFs (provided in Table 3 of the following) by the daily consumption rate of
soil by chicken:
• Stephens, R.D., M. Petreas, and G.H. Hayward. 1995. "Biotransfer and Bioaccumulation
of Dioxins and Furans from Soil: Chickens as a Model for Foraging Animals." The
Science of the Total Environment. 175:253-273. July 20.
Stephens, Petreas, and Hayward (1995) conducted experiments to determine the bioavailability and the rate
of PCDDs and PCDFs uptake from soil by the foraging chickens. Three groups of White Leghorn
chickens were studied— control group, low exposure group, and high exposure group. Eggs, tissues (liver,
adipose, and thigh), feed, and feces were analyzed. The Stephens, Petreas, and Hayward (1995)
experimental information was intended to explain the relationship between sofl PCDDs/PCDFs and human
foods and, consequently, provide a basis for setting regulatory limits on allowable concentrations in soil
used in agriculture. For this HHRAP, to be conservative, BCF values for chicken thigh meat from the high
exposure group were adopted.
Consumption rate of soil by chicken (0.02 kg DW/day) was calculated using the following methodology:
(1) Consumption rate of feed by chicken was obtained from U.S. EPA (1995a), which cites a
value of 0.2 kg DW feed/day obtained from various literature sources.
(2) The fraction of feed that is soil (0.1) was obtained from Stephens, Petreas, and
Hayward (1995).
(3) Feed consumption rate of 0.2 kg/day was multiplied by the fraction of feed that is soil
(0.1), to obtain the sofl consumption rate by chicken of 0.2 x 0.1 = 0.02 kg DW soil/day.
Therefore, the BCF values for chicken and eggs were multiplied by a chicken consumption rate of soil of
0.02 kg(DW)/day, respectively,; to obtain Ba^,,^ and Ba^ values reported in this HHRAP.
Metals Baa,*** and Ba^ values for all metals except (cadmium, selenium, and zinc), are not available in
the literature. For cadmium, selenium, and zinc, U.S. EPA (1995a) cited Ba values that were derived by
U.S. EPA Region 6 ......... ^^
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division Office of Solid Waste
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering A-3-29
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
dividing uptake slopes [(g COPC/kg DW tissue)/(g COPC/kg DW feed)], obtained from U.S. EPA
(1992b), by a daily consumption rate of 0.2 kilograms DW per day by chicken. To obtain values reported
in this HHRAP, the dry weight Ba value was converted to a fresh weight value by assuming a moisture
content of 75 percent in eggs and chicken (U.S. EPA 1997h; and Pennington 1994).
Mercuric Compounds Elemental mercury is assumed to neither deposit onto soils nor get transferred to
the aboveground plant parts or grains. Therefore, there is no transfer of elemental mercury into the animal
tissue. Therefore, Ba values for elemental mercury are reported in this HHRAP as not applicable. This is
based on the assumptions made regarding speciation and fate and transport of mercury from stack
emissions.
If field data suggests otherwise, Bachlckm and Baegg values for elemental mercury can be derived from the
uptake slope factors as provided in U.S. EPA (1992b) and U.S. EPA (1995a), using the same consumption
rates discussed earlier for metals like cadmium, selenium, and zinc.
BajMzn and Ba values reported in this HHRAP for mercuric chloride and methyl mercury were derived
from data in U.S. EPA (1997g). U.S. EPA (1997g) provided Baehicken and Baegg values for mercury, but did
not specify for which form of mercury. Consistent with U.S. EPA (1997g), mercury is assumed to be
speciate into 87 percent divalent mercury and 13 percent methyl mercury in herbivore animal tissue. Also,
assuming that the BaMckat and Ba^ values provided in U.S. EPA (1997g) were for total mercury in animal
tissue, then biotransfer factors in U.S. EPA (1997g) can be apportioned in the fractions it is assumed to be
found in animal tissue.
Therefore, values reported in this HHRAP are based on the following:
• Default .Ba^fcte, value of 0.11 day/kg DW for mercury obtained from U.S. EPA (1997g)
was converted to a fresh weight basis assuming a 75 percent moisture content in chicken
(U.S. EPA 1997h; and Pennington 1994). The calculated Ba^n (fresh weight) value was
multiplied by (1) 0.13 to obtain a value for methyl mercury, and (2) 0.87 to obtain a value
for mercuric chloride (divalent mercury).
Default Ba^ value of 0.11 day/kg DW for mercury obtained from U.S. EPA (1997g) was
converted to a fresh weight basis assuming a 75 percent moisture content in eggs (U.S.
EPA 1997h; and Pennington 1994). The calculated Baegg (fresh weight) value was
multiplied by (1) 0.13 to obtain a value for methyl mercury, and (2) 0.87 to obtain a value
for mercuric chloride (divalent mercury).
A3.5.4
Bioconcentration and Bioaccumulation Factors for Fish
Bioconcentration and bioaccumulation factors for fish are used for various compounds, depending on the
ATW value of the organic compound. Bioconcentration factors for fish (BCF^ were used for organics
(except PCDDs, PCDFs, and PCBs) with a log Km value less than 4.0; and for metals (except lead and
mercury). Bioaccumulation factors for fish (BAF^ were used for organics (except PCDDs, PCDFs, and
PCBs) with a log Km value greater than 4.0, lead, and mercuric compounds. Biota-sediment accumulation
factors for fish (BSAF^ were used for PCDDs, PCDFs, and PCBs.
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-30
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
A3.5.4.1
Bioconcentration Factors for Fish
BCF.
fish
is the ratio of the COPC concentration in fish to the COPC concentration in the water column
- f -— — «• ««*. ^ WTJ..IWWJ.IU.CIU.VUI in uiv waici cuiumn
where the fish is exposed. It accounts for uptake of COPCs by fish from water passing across the gills
IAV N "^ ? W6re US6d f°r *" °rganic comPounds ^th a log ^ of less than 4.0 (cutoff value with
XAfju} and for all metals, except lead and mercury, as cited in U.S. EPA (1995b). This implies that the
concentration of COPC in the fish is only due to water intake by the fish, and compounds with a log K of
less than 4.0 are assumed not to bioaccumulate. &<*>*»•
BCF values reported in this HHRAP are either:
1)
2)
3)
NOTE:
Geometric mean of a valid number of field-measured values obtained from various field
studies (or)
Geometric mean of laboratory-measured values obtained from various experimental
studies (or)
Estimated values calculated using a correlation equation
When only one valid field-measured value for a COPC was found in the literature,
the higher of the field-measured value and the geometric mean of
laboratory-measured values, was used.
In general, field measured BCFs were assumed to be based on total (dissolved and suspended) water
column concentrations; and laboratory measured BCFs were assumed to be based on dissolved water
column concentrations. This distinction is important for compounds with a log K^ of greater than or equal
to 4.0, because significant amounts of a COPC can partition into the suspended sediment organic carbon
(or paniculate phase) of the water column. For compounds with a log J^, of less than 4.0, most of COPC
is associated with the dissolved phase of the water column and negligible amounts of COPC is associated
T ?n S^ndf SCdiment phase " ±e water column- Therefore, for compounds with a log K^ of less
than 4.0, BCF values based on dissolved COPC water concentrations in the water column are essentially
the same as BCF values based on total (dissolved + suspended) COPC water concentrations in the water
column.
This HHRAP does not recognize differences in total versus dissolved water concentrations when
calculating fish concentrations fiomJCF^ values for compounds with a log K^ of less than 4 0 Since
?r i?^ater c?noe?atfa18 is ** maJ°r contributing factor from compounds with a log Km of less tha^i
4.U, all BCF^ values (irrespective of whether they were derived using total or dissolved water
concentrations) can be multiplied by COPC concentration in the dissolved water column (CLJ to calculate
fish concentrations. This assumption is necessary because (1) literature data is often unclear if the water
concentrations are dissolved or total concentrations, and (2) most of the literature reviewed indicated that
laboratory experiments were conducted using filtered or distilled water; or the experiments were conducted
using fresh water, but were filtered before analyses for water concentrations.
For organics with a log Km value of less than 4.0, BCF^ values were obtained from either of
two methods:
Field-measured or laboratory-measured values from various experimental studies were
evaluated by U.S. EPA (1998). This information is summarized in the following
document:
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-31
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
U.S. EPA. 1998. Screening Level Ecological Risk Assessment Protocol for
H&ardous Waste Combustion Facilities. Draft Interim Final. April.
Field-measured data is only (1) available for a limited number of compounds, and
(2) based on a single study. In such cases, the field-measured value or the geometric mean
of field-measured values were compared with the geometric mean of laboratory-measured
values, and the higher one used. A detailed discussion on sources of BCF values and
methodology followed are provided in Appendix C of U.S. EPA (1998).
When measured values were not available or could not be evaluated, the following
correlation equation recommended by Lyman, Reehl, and Rosenblatt (1982) was used:
log BCFflsh = - 0.23 + 0.76 log
Equation A-3-19
Correlation Equation A-3-19 was developed by the following:
Veith, G D., K.J. Macek, S.R. Petrocelli, and J. Caroll. 1980. "An Evaluation of Using
Partition Coefficients and Water Solubility to Estimate Bioconcentration Factors for
Organic Chemicals in Fish." Journal of Fish. Res. Board Can. Prepublication Copy.
Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) measured BCF values for four fish species in flow-through
laboratory studies that were exposed to a wide range of organic chemicals. BCF^ values calculated by
using correlation Equation A-3-19 are (1) based on dissolved water concentrations, and (2) not
lipid-normalized.
BCFM values provided in U.S. EPA (1995b) were either measured or calculated values.
values, U.S. EPA (1995b) either (1) obtained measured values from various literature sources ; U.S. EPA s
AQUIRE database, or (2) used empirical chemical class-specific correlation equations US. EPA (1998)
reSd a tot of original literature sources cited by the AQUIRE database. In general, BCF value* ^ the
AQUIRE database were either reported wrong, incorrectly calculated, or calculated from invalid data.
U.S. EPA (1995b) also specified that the BCF values were lipid-normalized. Therefore, £C/>A values
could not be used in this HHRAP.
U.S. EPA (1994f? and NC DEHNR (1997) estimated BCFfKh values for PAHs and pesticides using
correlation equations provided in the following:
Ogata, M., K. Fujisawa, Y. Ogino, and E. Mano. 1984. "Partition Coefficients as ^
Measure of Bioconcentration Potential of Crude Oil Compounds in Fish and Shellfish.
Bulletin of Environmental COPC Toxicology. Volume 33. Page 561.
Ellegehausen, H., U. Guth, and H.O. Esser. 1980. "Factors Determining the
Bioaccumulation Potential of Pesticides in the Individual Compartments of Aquatic Food
Chains." Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 4:134.
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-32
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
However, because of the limited applicability to only specific classes of compounds (PAHs and pesticides)
values from U.S. EPA (1994f) and NC DEHNR (1997) were not used in this HHRAP.
US EPA (1994f) and NC DEHNR (1997), both used a log K^ cutoff value of 5.5, which implies that
(1) for a log K^ of less than 5.5, BCFs for fish were used, and (2) for a log K^ of greater than 5 5 BAFs
for fish were used. U.S. EPA (1995b) stated that a cutoff value of 4.0 is more widely accepted by the
scientific community, based on experimental results.
Therefore, for consistency, BCF^ values for this HHRAP, were obtained from experimental field and
laboratory studies when available. When measured values were not available, values were calculated
using correlation Equation A-3-19.
For metals (except lead and mercury), BCF^ values reported in this HHRAP are measured values
obtained from various literature studies, as cited in U.S. EPA (1998). Measured values from various
experimental studies were evaluated by U.S. EPA (1998). Detailed discussion and sources of measured
values were provided in U.S. EPA (1998). For lead, a BAF is more applicable than a BCF as it tends to
bioaccumulate. The BAF value for lead is discussed in Section A3 .4.4.2.
Mercuric Compounds For mercuric compounds, a BAF is more applicable than a BCF as they tend to
bioaccumulate. BAF values for the mercuric compounds are discussed in the following Section A3.4.4.2.
A3.5.4.2 Bioaccumulation Factors for Fish
the ratio of the COPC concentration in fish to the COPC concentration in the water body where
the fish are exposed. The EAFm accounts for uptake of COPCs by fish from water and sediments passing
across the gills, and from consumption of various foods including plankton, daphnids, and other fish
BAFs for fish were used for organic compounds (except PCBs, PCDDs, and PCDFs) with a log K
greater than 4.0, lead and mercuric compounds.
For compounds with a log K^ of greater than or equal to 4.0, COPCs can significantly partition into the
suspended sediment organic carbon (or particulate phase) of the water column. Therefore BAF values
should be based on total (dissolved and suspended) water column concentrations. BAFs reported in this
HHRAP are either:
Geometric mean of field-measured values obtained from various experimental studies (or)
Predicted values calculated by multiplying a food chain multiplier (FCM) with a geometric
mean of various laboratory measured BCFs. A FCM is the ratio of a BAF to a BCF, and
is used to account for food chain biomagnification from a lower to a upper trophic level
(or)
Predicted values calculated by multiplying a FCM with an estimated BCF. BCFs were
estimated using correlation Equation A-3-19.
When only one valid field-measured value for a COPC was found in the literature,
me higher of the field-measured value and the geometric mean of
laboratory-measured values, was used.
In general, (1) field-measured BAFs were assumed to be based on total (dissolved and suspended) water
column concentrations, (2) laboratory-measured BCFs, and therefore, the BAFs predicted from them, were
U.S. EPA Region 6 —_——___ _
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division Office of
-------
July 1998
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
assumed to be based on dissolved water column concentrations, and (3) estimated BCFs using correlation
Equation A-3-19, and therefore, the BAFs predicted from them, were assumed to be based on dissolved
water column concentrations. In addition, field-measured BCFs, for compounds with a log K greater than
4.0, were assumed to be equal to BAFs, because the tissue concentrations are a result of uptake of water
(dissolved and suspended), sediment, and various trophic level food.
For consistency, all field-measured BAF (or BCF) values were adjusted according to the metiiodology
specified in U S EPA (1995bc) to include only the dissolved water column fractions; (i.e., the BAFs based
antotal water concentrations were converted to BAFs based on dissolved water concentations^ This was
done, so that all BAF^ values (based on dissolved water concentrations) can be multiplied by the COFC
concentration in the dissolved water column (C^) to calculate fish concentrations.
In U.S. EPA (1995b), BAF values were estimated based on the models developed for the limnetic
ecosystem by the following:
Thomann, R.V. 1989. "Bioaccumulation Model of Organic Chemical Distribution in
Aquatic Food Chains." Environmental Science and Technology. 23(6):699-707.
and, for the littoral ecosystem by the following:
Thomann, R.V.,J.P. Connolly, and T.F. Parkerton. 1992. "An Equilibrium Model of
Organic Chemical Accumulation in Aquatic Food Webs with Sediment Interaction."
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 11:615-629.
BAF values were predicted by multiplying a laboratory-measured or predicted BCF by a FCM. The
Thomann (1989) and Thomann, Connolly, and Parkerton (1992) models were adopted by U.S. EPA,
Office of Water, for the Great Lakes Water Quality Initiative in 1993. In 1995, U.S. EPA, Office of
Water, developed BAFs based on the following study:
• Gobas, FA.P.C. 1993. "A Model for predicting the bioaccumulation of hydrophobic
organic chemicals in aquatic food-webs: application to Lake Ontario." Ecological
Modelling. 69:1-17.
The Gobas (1993) model was adopted to develop the latest water quality criteria and is provided in the
following two documents:
. US EPA 1995bb. Water Quality Guidance for the Great Lakes System.
Supplementary Information Document. Office of Water. EPA-820-B-95-001. March.
U.S. EPA. 1995bc. Great Lakes Water Quality Initiative. Technical Support Document
for the Procedure to Determine Bioaccumulation Factors. Office of Water.
EPA-820-B-95-005. March.
The Gobas (1993) food-chain model was preferred because, unlike the Thomann (1989) model, it includes
both benthic and pelagic food chains, thereby estimating exposure of organisms to compounds from both
the sediment and the water column. Other inherent drawbacks of the Thomann (1989) model were that the
model: (1) did not take into account metabolism, biotransformation, degradation, persistence, or seasonal or
temporal variability, (2) is extremely sensitive to certain input parameter such as the lipid content,
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-34
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
~ . July 1998
A «\,. , ,. , S'(4) is I"68*01131316 'm its assumption that the system is at steady state or in
i, and (5) had little application for compounds with a log A^ greater than 6.5, because the
sediment route of exposure was not considered.
The Gobas (1993) model: (1) accounts for metabolism, but sets the metabolic rate to zero because of lack
of data for individual compounds, (i.e., the metabolism is assumed not to occur), (2) incorporates the
concentration of the compound in both the sediment and the water column, the sediment route being
especially useful for compounds with a log K^ greater than 6.5, and (3) includes the disequilibrium
between concentrations of the compounds in sediment and the water column. Although the Thomann,
Connolly, andTarkerton (1992) model accounts for sediment interaction, according to U.S. EPA (W95bb)
the Gobas (1993) model required fewer input parameters which could be more easily specified
to
H?RAP reC°^mfnds BAF values *** from *» Gobas (1993) model. The methodology
BAF values using BCFs and a FCM is described in detail in U.S. EPA (1995bc).
The following equation cited in U.S. EPA (1995bc) was used to convert the BAF based on total water
concentrations to a BAF based on dissolved water concentrations:
(DOC) (KJ
10
Equation A-3-20
where
ffd = fraction of COPC that is freely dissolved in water
DOC = concentration of dissolved organic carbon, kg organic carbon / L water
POC = concentration of paniculate organic carbon, kg organic carbon / L water
Since, the Gobas (1993) model was derived from a study conducted at Lake Ontario, DOC and POC
values for Lake Ontario were used. Values cited in U.S. EPA (1995bc) were:
DOC = 2xlO-6kg/L
POC =7.5xlO-9kg/L
A BAF based on dissolved water concentrations can be calculated from a BAF based on total water
concentrations as follows:
BAF (dissolved) = BAF (totat> -
ffd
Equation A-3^21
FCMs were obfeuned from Table 2 of U.S. EPA (1995bc). U.S. EPA (1995bc) provided FCMs as a
function oflog^mincrementsofO.l for trophic level 2, 3, and 4 aquatic organisms. For this HHRAP
humans are assumed to consume trophic level 3 or 4 fish. The higher FCM value of trophic levels 3 and 4
was used in this HHRAP. When the log Km value of a COPC in this HHRAP was between two log; H
U.S. EPA Region 6 ~ —'
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division J^£' EP^_ ,..„,
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering Office of Solid Waste
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
values listed in Table 2 of U.S. EPA (1995bc), the FCM for the next highest log K^ value was used.
panics For all organics (except PCBs, PCDDs and PCDFs) with a log K^ greater than or equal to 4.0,
the FCM, which accounts for accumulation through the food chain in addition to water, becomes greater
than 1 . Therefore, a BAF^ which takes the food chain into consideration, is more appropriate than a
For all organics with a log*™ greater than or equal to 4.0, BAFs were derived using one of following fliree
methods:
n BAF = Field measured BAF or BCF, adjusted for dissolved water concentrations
BAF = Laboratory measured BCF multiplied by a FCM for either trophic level 3
BAF = Estimated BCF calculated using correlation equation A-3-19 multiplied by
a FCM for either trophic level 3 or 4 fish
2)
3)
Both field and laboratory measured values were derived from various literature sources cited in
U.S. EPA (1998). FCMs were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc).
BAF values in U.S. EPA (1995b) were eitiier (1) derived from the Thomann (1989) and Thomann,
Connolly, and Parkerton (1992) models for organics with a log Km less than 6.5 , or (2) assumed a default
BAR* vdue of 1,000 for organics with a log Km greater than 6.5. The default value was based on (1) an
analysis of available data on PAHs, and (2) recommendations by the following:
Stephan, C.E., and others. 1993. "Derivation of Proposed Human Health and Wildlife
Bioaccumulation Factors for the Great Lakes Initiative." Office of Research and
Development, U.S. Environmental Research Laboratory. PB93-1 54672. Springfield,
Virginia.
U S EPA (1994f) presented BAFfah values estimated by three different methods: (1) measured BAF^
(2) measured BCF^ multiplied by a food-chain multiplier estimated from log Km , and (3) BAF^
estimated from log K^ However, it provides values for only six compounds.
NC DEHNR (1997) provided BAF^ values without any references specific to sources of values for each
compound. U.S. EPA (1994f) and NC DEHNR (1997) both used a log ^cutoff value of 5 ^ which
£0taL accumulation occurs only at a log KOW greater than 5.5. U.S EPA (1995b) stated ft* a cutoff
value of 4.0 is more widely accepted by the scientific community. Therefore, BAF^ values in the primary
guidance documents were not used in this HHRAP.
Metals (lead) For lead, the food-chain multiplier becomes greater than 1; therefore, a BAF is more
appropriate. The BAF* value reported in this HHRAP for lead was obtained as a geometac mean from
various literature sources described in U.S. EPA (1998). Since metals are assumed insoluble under neutral
conditions, the dissolved and total water concentrations are almost equal. However, for consistency, the
value for lead was adjusted for dissolved fractions.
Mercuric Compounds Consistent with U.S. EPA (1997g), elemental mercury is expected not to deposit
significantly onto soils and surface water. Therefore, there it is assumed that there is no transfer of
elemental mercury into fish. Fish are assumed to be exposed only to the divalent and organic forms of
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-36
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
mercury that exists in the water and soil/sediment media. However, consistent with the conservative
approach adopted by previous guidance documents, all of mercury in the fish is assumed to exist or be
converted to the methyl mercury (organic) form after uptake into the fish tissue. Therefore, for this
HHRAP, the BAF^ value for methyl mercury was obtained from U.S. EPA (1997g) for a trophic level 4
fish.
A3.5.4.3
Biota-Sediment Accumulation Factor for Fish
PCDDSPCDFS,andPCKs For PCDDs, PCDFs, and PCBs, BSAF^ values should be used instead of
BAFs for fish. BSAF^ values reported in this HHRAP were obtained from U.S. EPA (1994a).
BSAFju, accounts for the transfer of COPCs from the bottom sediment to the lipid in fish. U.S EPA
(1994a) and (1993d) recommended using BSAF^ values for dioxin-like compounds, including PCBs
because of their lipophilic nature. U.S. EPA (1995b) also stated that BSAFflsh values (1) were used for
2,3,7,8-TCDD and PCBs to estimate protective sediment concentrations instead of surface water
concentrations, and (2) were a more reliable measure of bioaccumulation potential because of the analytical
difficulties in measuring dissolved concentrations in surface water. BSAF values in the literature vary
because of the different experimental and sampling techniques used. U.S. EPA (1994a) provided exposure
scenanos for conducting site-specific assessments to dioxin-like compounds. For each scenario US EPA
(1994a) recommended the use of the following BSAFfish values based on the amount of chlorination of the
PCDD or PCDF:
For TetraCDDs and TetraCDFs, BSAFflsh = 9.0 x lO"02
For TetraCDDs and TetraCDFs, BSAFf* = 9.0 x lO"02
For TetraCDDs and TetraCDFs, BSAF^ = 4.0 x lO"02
• For TetraCDDs and TetraCDFs, BSAF^ = 5.0 x 10"03
• For TetraCDDs and TetraCDFs, BSAF^h = 1.0 x 10"04
Homologue group BSAF^ values obtained from U.S. EPA (1994a) were either measured or estimated
values that were based on a whole fish lipid content of 7 percent and an organic carbon content of
3 percent. The BSAF^ values reported in this HHRAP are consistent with the values presented in primary
guidance documents.
A3.6
HUMAN HEALTH BENCHMARKS
The following sections discuss carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic toxicity benchmarks of compounds The
toxicity information provided in the HHRAP is for informational purposes to help permitting authorities
explain the basis for selecting contaminants of concern. Since toxicity benchmarks and slope factors may
change as additional toxicity research is conducted, permitting authorities should consult with the most
current version of EPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) and Health Effects Assessment
Summary Tables before completing a risk assessment to ensure that the toxicity data used in the risk
assessment is based upon the most current Agency consensus.
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-37
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
AnnendixA-3
July 1998
A3.6.1 Reference Dose (Rfd) and Reference Concentration (RfC)
Reference dose (Rfd) is defined as a daily intake rate of a compound estimated to pose no appreciable risk
of deleterious effects over a specific exposure duration (U.S. EPA 1989e). Reference concentration (Rfc) is
defined as the concentration of a compound estimated (with uncertainty spanning perhaps an order of
magnitude) to pose no appreciable risk of deleterious effects over a specific exposure duration (U.S. EPA
1989e).
The reference dose (Rfd) and reference concentration (RfC) values for all compounds were obtained from
one of the following references (listed in order of preference):
• U.S. EPA. 1997b. Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). June - December.
• U.S. EPA. 1995c. "Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables (HEAST)." Fiscal Year
Annual 1995. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Washington, DC.
EPA/540/R-95/036.
• U.S. EPA. 1997c. "Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables (HEAST)." Fiscal Year
Annual 1997. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Washington, DC.
EPA/540/R-95/036.
• U.S. EPA. 1997d,e,f. " Risk Assessment Issue Papers". Superfund Technical Support
Center. National Center for Environmental Assessement. December.
• U.S. EPA. 1997a. "Risk-Based Concentrations." Region 3. June
U.S. EPA. 1996c. "Region 9 Preliminary Remediation Goals." Region 9. August.
The U.S. EPA (1997b) IRIS database and the U.S. EPA (1995c, 1997c) HEAST are compilations of
human health risk information obtained from several literature sources. U.S. EPA (1995c, 1997c) cited
ffilS as the main source of human health risk information.
Rfd and RfC values in this HHRAP were revised, because values in U.S. EPA (1997b) and U.S. EPA
(1995c, 1997c) are updated regularly on the basis of literature data.
A3.6.2 Oral Cancer Slope Factor (CSF), Inhalation CSF, and Inhalation Unit Risk Factor
(ERF)
Oral CSF, inhalation CSF, and inhalation URF values for all compounds were obtained from U.S. EPA
(1997b) or (1995c, 1997c). In addition, U.S. EPA (1996c; 1997a,d,e,f) were also used to obtained the oral
CSF, inhalation CSF, and the inhalation URF when these values were not available in U.S. EPA (1997b)
or (1995c; 1997c). Additional guidance for determining reference concentrations for chronic inhalation
exposure is provided in U.S. EPA (1994h).
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-38
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
A3.6.3
Explanation of Calculated Toxicity Benchmark Values
The preference for health benchmarks is to obtain values from IRIS or HEAST The following
methodology was used to calculate missing benchmarks using available benchmarks that are based
route-to-route extrapolation:
on
1) Oral RJDs presented in IRIS/Heast/EPA reviewed documents were used if available
Missing oral RfDs were calculated from the RfC assuming route-to-route extrapolation
using the following equation:
70 kg BW
2)
3)
Oral CSFs presented in IRIS/Heast/EPA reviewed documents were used when available
In the case of missing Oral CSFs:
a)
b)
Oral CSF = Inhalation CSF, or
Oral CSF = Inhalation CSF calculated from Inhalation URF assuming route-to-
route extrapolation.
Inhalation RfCs presented in IRIS/Heast/EPA reviewed documents were used when
available. If RfCs were not available they were calculated from the RfD assuming route-
to-route extrapolation using the following equation:
Inhalation RfC =
70 *E Bw
20 m3/d
4) Inhalation RfDtf values were calculated as follows:
a) From the inhalation RfC obtained from IRIS/Heast/EPA reviewed documents
using the following equation:
RfD = RfC • 20
** 70kg
b) If the RfC was not available from IRIS/Heast/EPA reviewed documents, the
following was assumed:
Inhalation RfD = Oral RfD
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-39
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
5)
For inhalation URFs, values were obtained from IRIS/Heast/EPA reviewed documents. If
the inhalation URFs were not available they were calculated from oral CSF, using the
following equation:
Inhal. URF =
Inhal. URF - 20 m*/d
70 kg*. 1000 pg/mg
The inhalation CSFs presented in IRIS/Heast/EPA reviewed documents were used when
available.
a) If no inhalation CSF was available; it was calculated from inhalation URF, using
the following equation:
Inhal
. URF -10 kg
20 m3ld
A3.6.4
b)
If no inhalation URF was available; the following was assumed based on route-to-
route extrapolation:
Inhalation CSF = Oral CSF
Uncertainties Involved when using Toxicity Benchmarks Calculated based on Route-
to-Route Extrapolation
In the assessment of noncarcinogenic and carcinogenic risk from COPCs, EPA-derived or reviewed health
benchmarks (R/Ds, RfCs, CSFs, URFs, ^Inhalation CSFs) are recommended. However, for numerous
compounds, a complete set of inhalation and oral EPA-derived health benchmarks are not available In
suchcases for this HHRAP, the health benchmarks were calculated based on available EPA-derived
benchmarks values. For instance, if the oral RfD (mg/kg/day) was available and the RfC (mg/m3) was not;
the RJC was calculated by multiplying the RfD by an average human inhalation rate of 20 m /day and
dividing by the average human body weight of 70 kg. This conversion is based on a route-to-route
extrapolation, which assumes that the toxicily of the given chemical is equivalent over all routes of
exposure.
This process does introduce uncertainty into the risk assessment. By using this method, the risk assessor
must assume that the qualitative data supporting the benchmark value for a certain route also applies to the
route in question. For example, if an RfD is available and the RfC is calculated from that value, the risk
assessor is assuming mat the toxicity seen following oral exposure will be equivalent to toxicily following
inhalation exposure. This assumption could overestimate or underestimate the toxicity of the given
chemical following inhalation exposure.
Because of the degree of uncertainty involved in using toxicity benchmark values calculated based
ronte-to-ronte extrapolation, this HHRAP recommends that a qualitative assessment of the toxicity
information available for the chemical and exposure route be performed. This will enable the risk
on
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-40
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
assessor to make a well informed decision concerning the validity of values calculated based on route-
to-route extrapolation. This qualitative assessment should also be included in the uncertainty section
of the risk assessment.
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-41
-------
-------
' »>•<# ^logical Profile for
Phthatlate. Oak Ridge National Laboratory. December.
BacciE D Calamari5C.Gaggi5andM.Vighi. 1990. "Bioconcentration of Organic Chemical Vapors in
S« reS'v ? T ^Measuremente «* Correlation." 0"
Technology. Volume 24. Number 6. Pages 885-889.
l-oms 'an.ighi. 1992. "Chlorinated Dioxins:
lization from Soils and Bioconcentration in Plant Leaves." Bulletin of Environmental
Contamination and Toxicology. Volume 48. Pages 401-408. ™nmentai
"Predi^ti°/ °f ^adi°nuclide ^ values ^- Soil-Plant Concentration Ratios."
American Nuclear Society. 41:53-54. «""»•
.T^.19,89' "Modeling Supll<>rt fa »e RURA «* Municipal
*"-**>"««»
Volunle22.
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. Volume 7. Pages 1 17-124.
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-43
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
with Hydrophobicity as Measured by Aqueous Solubility and Octanol-Water Partition
Coefficient." Journal of Chromatography. Volume 238. Pages 335-346.
Budavari,S,M.J.O'Neil5A.Smith,andP.E.Heckelman. 1989. The Merck Index: An Encyclopedia of
Chemicals, Drugs, andBiologicals. llth Edition. Merck and Company, Inc. Rahway,
New Jersey.
California Environmental Protection Agency (CEPA). 1993. "Parameter Values and Ranges for
CALTOX." Draft. Office of Scientific Affairs. California Department of Toxic Substances
Control. Sacramento, CA. July.
Chamberlain, A.C. 1970. "Interception and Retention of Radioactive Aerosols by Vegetetion."
Atmospheric Environment. Pergamon Press. Great Britain. Volume 4. Pages 57-78.
Di Toro, D.M. 1985. "A Particle Interaction Model of Reversible Organic Chemical Sorption."
'chemosphere. 14(10):1503-1538.
DiToro, D.M., C.S. Zarba, D.J. Hansen, W.J. Berry, R.C. Swartz, C.E. Cowan, SPPavlouH.E. Allen,
N A Thomas, and P.R.Paquin. 1991. 'Technical Basis for Establishing SedimenQuality
Criteria for Nonionic Compounds Using Equilibrium Partitioning." Environmental Toxicology
and Chemistry. 10:1541-1583.
Eadie,BJ,N.R.Morehead,andP.F.Landrum. 1990. "Three-Phase Partitioning of Hydrophobic
Organic Compounds in Great Lakes Waters." Chemosphere. Volume 20. Pages 161-178.
Ellegehausen,H.,J.A.Guth,andH.O.Esser. 1980. "Factors Determining the Bioaccumulation Potential
of Pesticides in the Individual Compartments of Aquatic Food Chains." Ecotoxicology and
Environmental Safety. 4:134.
Gobas FAP.C. 1993. "A Model for predicting the bioaccumulation of hydrophobic organic chemicals in
' aquatic food-webs: application to Lake Ontario." Ecological Modelling. 69:1-17.
Hansch,C.,andA.Leo. 1985. Medchem Project. Pomona College. Clakemont, California. Issue
W. 26.
Haaue R. andD Schmedding. 1975. "A Method of Measuring the Water Solubility of Hydrophobic
' Chemicals: Solubility of Five Polychlorinated Biphenyls." Bulletin of Environmental
Contamination and Toxicology. Volume 14. Pages 13-18.
Hinckley DA TF Bidleman, and W.T. Foreman. 1990. "Determination of Vapor Pressures for ^
Nonpoiar and Semipolar Organic Compounds from Gas Chromatographic Retention Data.
Journal of Chemical Engineering Data. Volume 35. Pages 232-237.
Hofflnan,F.O.,K.M.Thiessen,M.L. Frank, and B.G.Blaylock. 1992. "C^tification of the Merception
and Initial Retention of Radioactive Contaminants Deposited on Pasture Grass by Simulated
Rain." Atmospheric Environment. 26A(18):3313-3321.
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-44
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3 __ July 1QQ«
Howard,P.H. 1989-1993. HandbookofEnvironmental Fate and Exposure Data For Organic
C^^aiS/,V°lUmeI: LarSe Production and Priority Pollutants (1989). Volume II: Solvents
(1990). Volume III: Pesticides (1991). Volume IV: Solvents! (1993). Lewis Publishers
Chelsea, Michigan.
Howard P.H., R.S. Boethling, W.F. Jarvis, W.M. Meylan, and E.M. Michalenko, 1991. Handbook of
Environmental Degradation Rates. Lewis Publishers. Chelsea, Michigan.
Junge,C.E. 1977. Fate of 'Pollutants in the Air and Water Environments, Part I. Suffer, I H
Ed. Wiley. New York. Pages 7-26. ' "
Karickhoff S.W..D.S. Brown, and T.A. Scott. 1979. "Sorption of Hydrophobic Pollutants on Natural
Sediments." Water Resources. 13:241-248.
Karickhoff, S.W., and J.M. Long. 1995. " Internal Report on Summary of Measured, Calculated, and
Recommended Log K^ Values." Environmental Research Laboratory. Athens, Georgia.
April 10,
Landrun^ P.F., S.R. Nihart, B.J. Eadie, and W.S. Gardner. 1984. "Reverse-Phase Separation Method for
Determmmg Pollutant Binding to Aldrich Humic Acid and Dissolved Organic Carbon of Natural
Waters. Environmental Science and Technology. 18(3): 187-192.
Lorber, M. 1995. "Development of an Air-to-plant Vapor Phase Transfer for Dioxins and Furans
Presented at the 15th International Symposium on Chlorinated Dioxins and Related Compounds"
August 21-25,1995 in Edmonton, Canada. Abstract in Organohalogen Compounds.
2A\ 1 /y™ 1 oO.
Lucius, J.E R.0.01hoeft,P.L.Hill, and S.K. Duke. 1992. Properties and Hazards of 108 Selected
Substances -1992 Edition. U.S. Department of the Interior Geological Survey. U.S. Geological
Survey Open-File Report 92-527. September.
Lyman,W.J W.F.Reehl, and D.H. Rosenblatt. 1982. Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation
Methods: Environmental Behavior of Organic Compounds. McGraw-Hill Book Company
New York, New York.
Ma,K.C W.Y.Shiu,andD.Mackay. 1990. A Critically Reviewed Compilation of Physical and
Chemical and Persistence Data for 110 Selected EMPPL Substances. Prepared for the Ontario
Ministry of Environment. Water Resources Branch. Toronto, Ontario.
Mabey, W.R., J.H. Smith, R.T. Podoll, H.L. Johnson, H.L. Mill, T.W. Chiou, J. Gate I
Waight-Partridge, H. Jaber, and D. Vanderberg. 1982. Aquatic Fate Process Data for Organic
Priority Pollutants. U.S. EPA Report Number 440/4-81-014. December.
McCarthy, J.F and B.D. Jimenez. 1985. "Interactions Between Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and
f!^0^ Bindmg ^ Dissociation." Environmental Science and Technology.
-1076.
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S.EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-45
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3 _ •
MackayD,andS.Paterson. 1991. "Evaluating the Multimedia Fate of Organic^Chemicals: A Level IE
Fugacity Model" Environmental Science and Technology. Volume 25(3). Pages 427-436.
Mackav D and W Y. Shiu. 1975. "The Aqueous Solubility and Air-Water Exchange Characteristics of
Hydrocarbons under Environmental Conditions." In Chemistry and Physics of Aqueous,Gas
Solutions. Electrochem. Soc.,rnc. Princeton, New Jersey.
Mackav D WY Shiu, and K.C. Ma. 1992. Illustrated Handbook of Physical-Chemical Properties and
Environmental Fate for Organic Chemicals. Volume I-Monoaromatic Hydrocarbons
Chlorobenzenes, andPCBs. Volume U-Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Polychlorinated
Dioxins, ondDibenzoJurans. Volume Hi-Volatile Organic Chemicals. Lewis Publishers.
Chelsea, Michigan.
McLachlan,M.S, H. Thoma, M. Reissinger, and O. Hutzinger. 1990 "PCDD/F m a^ Agricultural Food
Chain. Parti: PCDD/F Mass Balance of a Lactating Cow." Chemosphere. Volume 20
(Numbers 7-9). Pages 1013-1020.
Macrady, J.K., and S.P. Maggard. 1993. "Uptake and Photodegradation of
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin Sorbed to Grass Foliage." Environmental Science and
Technology. 27:343-350.
Mallon.BJ and F I. Harrison. 1984. "Octanol-Water Partitioning Coefficient of Benzo(a)pyrene:
Measurement, Calculation, and Environmental Implications." Bulletin of Environmental
Contamination and Toxicology. New York. Pages 316-323.
Miller, M.M,S.P.Wasik,G.L. Huang, W.Y. Shiu, and D.Mackay. 1985. "Relationships Between
Octanol-Water Partition Coefficient and Aqueous Solubility." Environmental Science and
Technology. 19(6):522-529.
Mills W.B, J.D. Dean, D.B. Porcella, S.A. Gherini, R.J.M. Hudson, W.E. Frick, G.L. Rupp, and G.L.
Bowie. 1982. Water Quality Assessment: A Screening Procedure for Toxic and Conventional
Pollutants. Parti. EPA600/6-82-004a.
Montgomery, J.H., and L.M.Welkom. 1991. Groundwater Chemicals Desk Reference. Lewis
Publishers. Chelsea, Michigan.
Murray, J.M., R.F. Pottie, and C. Pupp. 1974. "The Vapor Pressures and Enthalpies of Sublimation of
*Five Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons." Can. J. Chem. 52:557-563.
Moses, A.J. 1978. The Practicing Scientist's Handbook. A Guide for Physical and Terrestrial Scientists
' and Engineers. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company. New York, NY.
North Carolina Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources (NC DEHNR). 1997 North
Carolina Protocol for Performing Indirect Exposure Risk Assessments for Hazardous Waste
Combustion Units. January.
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-46
-------
Hvmvan Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
Ogata, M., K. Fujisawa, Y. Ogino, and E. Mano. 1984. "Partition Coefficients as a Measure of
Bioconcentration Potential of Crude Oil Compounds in Fish and Shellfish." Bulletin of
Environmental Contaminant Toxicology. Volume 33. Page 561.
Pennington, J.A.T. 1994. Food Value of Portions Commonly Used. Sixteenth Edition. J.B. Lippincott
Company, Philadelphia.
Research Triangle Institute (RTF). 1992. Preliminary Soil Action Level for Superfund Sites, Draft
Interim Report. Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Hazardous Site
Control Division, Remedial Operations Guidance Branch. Arlington, Virginia. EPA Contract No.
68-W1-0021. Work Assignment No. B-03. Work Assignment Manager, Loren Henning.
December.
RTI. 1994. "Draft Report—Chemical Properties for Soil Screening Levels." North Carolina. July 26.
Smith, J.H., W.R. Mabey, N. Bahonos, B.R. Holt, S.S. Lee, T.W. Chou, D.C. Venberger, and T. Mill.
1978. Environmental Pathways of Selected Chemicals in Fresh Water Systems: Part II,
Laboratory Studies. Interagency Energy-Environment Research Program Report. Environmental
Research Laboratory. Office of Research and Development. U.S. EPA. Athens, Georgia
EPA-600/7-78-074. Page 304.
Stephenson, R.M., and S. Malanowski. 1987. Handbook of the Thermodynamics of Organic
Compounds. Elsevier Publishing Company, Inc. New York.
Stephan, C.E., and others. 1993. "Derivation of Proposed Human Health and Wildlife Bioaccumulation
Factors for the Great Lakes Initiative." Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental
Research Laboratory. PB93-154672. Springfield, Virginia.
Stephens, R.D., M. Petreas, and G.H. Hayward. 1995. "Biotransfer and Bioaccumulation of Dioxins and
Furans from Soil: Chickens as a Model for Foraging Animals." The Science of the Total
Environment. 175:253-273. July 20.
Thomann, R.V. 1989. "Bioaccumulation Model of Organic Chemical Distribution in Aquatic Food
Chains." Environmental Science and Technology. 23(6):699-707.
Thomann, R.V., J.P. Connolly, and T.F. Parkerton. 1992. "An Equilibrium Model of Organic Chemical
Accumulation in Aquatic Food Webs with Sediment Interaction." Environmental Toxicology and
Chemistry. 11:615-629.
Thompson, S.E., C.A. Burton, D.J. Quinn, and Y.C. Ng. 1972. "Concentration Factors of Chemical
Elements in Edible Aquatic Organisms." Lawrence Radiation Laboratory. Livermore, CA.
UCRL-50564, Revision 1. (Reference cited in updated version of Chapman, W.H., H.L. Fisher
and M.W. Pratt. 1968).
Travis, C.C. and A.D. Arms. 1988. "Bioconcentration of Organics in Beef, Milk, and Vegetation."
Environmental Science and Technology. 22:271 -274.
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-47
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3 __
July 1998
U.S. EPA. 1978. Environmental Pathways of Selected Chemicals in Freshwater Systems: Part II.
Laboratory Studies. Interagency Energy-Environment Research and Development Program
Report. Environmental Research Laboratory. Athens, GA. EPA 600/7-78-074. May.
U.S. EPA. 1986. Superfand Public Health Evaluation Manual. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response (OERR). Washington, D.C. October.
U.S. EPA. 1990. Interim Final Methodology for Assessing Health Risks Associated with Indirect
Exposure to Combustor Emissions. EPA/600/6-90/003. January.
U.S. EPA. 1992a. Handbook of Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Ground Water
Monitoring Constituents: Chemical and Physical Properties. EPA/530-R-92/022. Office of
Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
U.S. EPA. 1992b. Technical Support Document for the Land Application of Sewage Sludge. Volumes I
andll. EPA 822/R-93-001a. Office of Water. Washington, D.C.
U.S. EPA. 1992c. Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory Treatability DataBase. Version 5.0.
U.S. EPA. 1992d. Estimating Exposure to Dioxin-Like Compounds. Draft Report. Office of Research
and Development. Washington, D.C. EPA/600/6-88/005B. August.
U.S. EPA. 1993a. Assessment Tools for the Evaluation of Risk.
U.S. EPA. 1993b. Derivation of Proposed Human Health and Wildlife Bioaccumulation Factors for the
Great Lakes Initiative. Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Research
Laboratory. Duluth, Minnesota. March.
U.S. EPA. 1993c. "Proposed Water Quality Guidance for the Great Lakes System." Federal Register.
58:20802. April 16.
U.S. EPA. 1993d. Review Draft Addendum to the Methodology for Assessing Health Risks Associated
with Indirect Exposure to Combustor Emissions. Office of Health and Environmental
Assessment. Office of Research and Development. EPA-600-AP-93-003. November 10.
U.S. EPA. 1994a. Estimating Exposure to Dioxin-Like Compounds. Draft Report. Office of Research
and Development. Washington, D.C. EPA/600/6-88/005Ca,b,c. June.
U.S. EPA. 1994b. Superfund Chemical Data Matrix. OERR. Washington, D.C. June.
U.S. EPA 1994c. Draft Report-Chemical Properties for Soil Screening Levels. Prepared for the OERR.
Washington, DC. July 26.
U.S. EPA. 1994d. CHEM8— Compound Properties Estimation and Data. Version 1.00. CHEMDAT8
Air Emissions Program. Prepared for Chemicals and Petroleum Branch, OAQPS. Research
Triangle Park. North Carolina. November 18.
U.S. EPA. 1994e. Integrated Risk Information System. December.
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
™ ,..,„
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-48
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
U.S. EPA. 1994f. Revised Draft Guidance for Performing Screening Level Risk Analyses at Combustion
Facilities Burning Hazardous Wastes: Attachment C, Draft Exposure Assessment Guidance for
RCRA Hazardous Waste Combustion Facilities. OERR. Office of Solid Waste. December 14.
U.S. EPA. 1994h. Methods for Derivation of Inhalation Reference Concentrations and Application of
Inhalation Dosimetry. ORD. EPA/600/8-90/066F.
U.S. EPA. 1995a. Memorandum regarding Further Studies for Modeling the Indirect Exposure Impacts
from Combustor Emissions. From Mathew Lorber, Exposure Assessment Group, and Glenn Rice,
Indirect Exposure Team, Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office. Washington, D.C.
January 20.
U.S. EPA. 1995b. Review Draft Development of Human Health-Based and Ecologically-Based Exit
Criteria for the Hazardous Waste Identification Project. Volumes I and II. Office of Solid
Waste. March 3.
U.S. EPA. 1995c. "Health Effects Assessment.Summary Tables." Fiscal Year-1995 Annual. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Washington, D.C. EPA/540/R-95/036. May.
U.S. EPA. 1995d. WATERS—Air Emissions Models Wastewater Treatment. Version 4.0. OAQPS.
Research Triangle Park. North Carolina. May 1.
U.S. EPA. 1995e. Water Quality Guidance for the Great Lakes System. Supplementary Information
Document. Office of Water. EPA-820-B-95-001. March.
U.S. EPA. 1995f. Great Lakes Water Quality Initiative. Technical Support Document for the
Procedure to Determine Bioaccumulation Factors. Office of Water. EPA-820-B-95-005.
March.
U.S. EPA. 1996a. Mercury Study Report to Congress. Volume HI: An Assessment of Exposure from
Anthropogenic Mercury Emissions in the United States. SAB Review Draft. Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards and Office of Research and Development. EPA-452/R-96-001c.
April.
U.S. EPA. 1996b. Soil Screening Guidance: Technical Background Document and User's Guide.
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Washington, D.C. EPA/540/R-95/128. May.
U.S. EPA. 1996c. "Region 9 Preliminary Remediation Goals." Region 9. August.
U.S. EPA. 1997a. "Risk-Based Concentrations." Region 3. June
U.S. EPA. 1997b. Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). June - December.
U.S. EPA. 1997c. "Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables (HEAST). Fiscal Year 1997 Update".
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. EPA-540-R-97-036. PB97-921199. July.
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-49
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
U.S. EPA. 1997d. " Risk Assessment Issue Papers for: Derivation of a Provisional Chronic and
Subchronic RfC for Chloromethane (CASRN 74-87-3)." Superfund Technical Support Center.
National Center for Environmental Assessement. December.
U.S. EPA. 1997e. "Risk Assessment Issue Papers for: Carcinogenicily Information for
Tetrachloroethylene (CASRN 127-18-4)." Superfund Technical Support Center. National Center
for Environmental Assessement. December.
U.S. EPA. 1997f. "Risk Assessment Issue Papers for: Derivation of a Provisional Subchronic Inhalation
RfC for Benzene (CASRN 71-43-2)." Superfund Technical Support Center. National Center for
Environmental Assessement. December.
U.S. EPA. 1997g. Mercury Study Report to Congress. Volume III: Fate and Transport of Mercury in
the Environment. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards and Office of Research and
Development EPA-452/R-97-005. December.
U.S. EPA. 1997h. Exposure Factors Handbook. "Food Ingestion Factors". Volume H.
EPA/600/P-95/002Fb. August.
U.S. EPA. 1998. Screening Level Ecological Risk Assessment Protocol for Hazardous Waste
Combustion Facilities. Draft Interim Final. April.
Veith, G.D., K.J. Macek, S.R, Petrocelli, and J. Caroll. 1980. "An Evaluation of Using Partition
Coefficients and Water Solubility to Estimate Bioconcentration Factors for Organic Chemicals in
Fish." Journal of Fish. Res. Board Can. Prepublication Copy.
Verschueren, K. 1983. Handbook of Environmental Data on Organic Chemicals. Second Edition.
Van Nostrand Reinhold Company. New York.
Weast,R.C. 1981. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 62nd Edition. Cleveland, Ohio. CRC Press.
Welsch-Pausch, K.M. McLachlan, and G. Umlauf. 1995. "Determination of the Principal Pathways of
Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins and Dibenzofurans to Lolium Multiflorum (Welsh Ray
Grass)". Environmental Science and Technology. 29: 1090-1098.
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-50
-------
Human Health Bisk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
ATTACHMENT
TABLES OF COMPOUND-SPECIFIC PARAMETER VALUES
(Page 1 of 10)
Table
A-3-1 CAS NUMBER 83-32-9:
A-3-2 CAS NUMBER 75-07-0:
A-3-3 CAS NUMBER 67-64-1:
A-3-4 CAS NUMBER 75-05-8:
A-3-5 CAS NUMBER 98-86-2:
A-3-6 CAS NUMBER 107-02-8:
A-3-7 CAS NUMBER 107-13-1:
A-3-8 CAS NUMBER 309-00-2:
A-3-9 CAS NUMBER 62-53-3:
A-3-10 CAS NUMBER 120-12-7:
A-3-11 CAS NUMBER 7440-36-0:
A-3-12 CAS NUMBER 12674-11-2:
A-3-13 CAS NUMBER 11097-69-1:
A-3-14 CAS NUMBER 7440-38-2:
A-3-15 CAS NUMBER 1912-24-9:
A-3-16 CAS NUMBER 7440-36-3:
A-3-17 CAS NUMBER 100-52-7:
A-3-18 CAS NUMBER 71-43-2:
A-3-19 CAS NUMBER 56-55-3:
A-3-20 CAS NUMBER 50-32-8:
ACENAPHTHENE A-3-61
ACETALDEHYDE A-3-65
ACETONE A-3-69
ACETONITRILE A-3-72
ACETOPHENONE A-3-75
ACROLEIN A-3-78
ACRYLONTTRILE A-3-81
ALDRIN A-3-84
ANILINE A-3-87
ANTHRACENE A-3-90
ANTIMONY A-3-93
AROCLOR1016 A-3-96
AROCLOR1254 A-3-99
ARSENIC A-3-102
ATRAZINE A-3-105
BARIUM , A-3-108
BENZALDEHYDE A-3-111
BENZENE A-3-114
BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE A-3-117
BENZO(A)PYRENE A-3-120
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-51
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
ATTACHMENT
TABLES OF COMPOUND-SPECIFIC PARAMETER VALUES
(Page 2 of 10)
CAS NUMBER 205-99-2: BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE A-3-123
CAS NUMBER 207-08-9: BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE A-3-126
BENZOICACH) A-3-129
BENZONITRILE A-3-133
BENZYL ALCOHOL A-3-136
BENZYL CHLORIDE A-3-139
BERYLLHJM A-3-142
BHC, ALPHA- A-3-145
BHC,BETA- A-3-148
CAS NUMBER 111-44-4: BIS(2-CHLORETHYL)ETHER A-3-151
CAS NUMBER 75-27-4: BROMODICHLOROMETHANE A-3-154
BROMOFORM (TRIBROMOMETHANE) A-3-157
BROMOPHENYL-PHENYLETHER, 4- .. A-3-160
BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE A-3-163
CADMIUM A-3-166
CARBON DISULFH)E A-3-170
CARBON TETRACHLORTOE A-3-173
CHLORDANE A-3-176
CHLORINE A-3-179
CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL, 4- A-3-182
CHLOROANILINE, p- A-3-185
A-3-21
A-3-22
A-3-23
A-3-24
A-3-25
A-3-26
A-3-27
A-3-28
A-3-29
A-3-30
A-3-31
A-3-32
A-3-33
A-3-34
A-3-35
A-3-36
A-3-37
A-3-38
A-3-39
A-3-40
A-3-41
CAS NUMBER 65-85-0:
CAS NUMBER 100-47-0:
CAS NUMBER 100-51-6:
CAS NUMBER 100-44-7:
CAS NUMBER 7440-41-7:
CAS NUMBER 319-84-6:
CAS NUMBER 319-85-7:
CAS NUMBER 75-25-2:
CAS NUMBER 101-55-3:
CAS NUMBER 85-68-7:
CAS NUMBER 7440-43-9:
CAS NUMBER 75-15-0:
CAS NUMBER 56-23-5:
CAS NUMBER 57-74-9:
CAS NUMBER 7782-50-5:
CAS NUMBER 59-50-7:
CAS NUMBER 106-47-8:
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-52
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
ATTACHMENT
TABLES OF COMPOUND-SPECIFIC PARAMETER VALUES
(Page 3 of 10)
CAS NUMBER 108-90-7: CHLOROBENZENE A-3-188
CAS NUMBER 510-15-6: CHLOROBENZILATE A-3-191
CHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE A-3-194
CHLOROETHANE A-3-198
A-3-42
A-3-43
A-3-44
A-3-45
A-3-46
A-3-47
A-3-48
A-3-49
A-3-50
A-3-51
A-3-52
A-3-53
A-3-54
A-3-55
A-3-56
A-3-57
A-3-58
A-3-59
A-3-60
A-3-61
A-3-62
CAS NUMBER 75-45-6:
CAS NUMBER 75-00-3:
CAS NUMBER 67-66-3:
CHLOROFORM
(TRICHLOROMETHANE) A-3-201
CAS NUMBER 39638-32-9: CHLOROISOPROPYL ETHER, BIS-1,2-. A-3-204
CAS NUMBER 91-58-7: CHLORONAPHTHALENE, 2- A-3-208
CAS NUMBER 95-57-8: CHLOROPHENOL, 2- A-3-211
CAS NUMBER 7005-72-3: CHLOROPHENYL-PHENYLETHER, 3- . A-3-214
CAS NUMBER 2921-88-2: CHLOROPYRIFOS A-3-218
CAS NUMBER 7440-47-3: CHROMIUM A-3-222
CAS NUMBER 18540-29-9: CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENT A-3-225
CAS NUMBER 218-01-9:
CHRYSENE A-3-228
CAS NUMBER 108-39-4: CRESOL,m- A-3-231
CAS NUMBER 95-48-7: CRESOL,o- A-3-234
CAS NUMBER 106-44-5: CRESOL, p- A-3-237
CAS NUMBER 98-82-8: CUMENE (ISOPROPYLBENZENE) A-3-240
CYANIDE A-3-243
DDD,4,4'- A-3-246
DDE, 4,4'- A-3-249
DDT, 4,4'- A-3-252
CAS NUMBER 57-12-5:
CAS NUMBER 72-54-8:
CAS NUMBER 72-55-9:
CAS NUMBER 50-29-3:
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-53
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
ATTACHMENT
TABLES OF COMPOUND-SPECIFIC PARAMETER VALUES
(Page 4 of 10)
A-3-63 CAS NUMBER 84-74-2: DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE A-3-255
A-3-64 CAS NUMBER 117-84-0: DI(N-OCTYL) PHTHALATE A-3-258
A-3-65 CAS NUMBER 333-41-5: DIAZINON A-3-261
A-3-66 CAS NUMBER 53-70-3: DIBENZO(A^)ANTHRACENE A-3-264
A-3-67 CAS NUMBER 96-12-8: DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE 1,2- .. A-3-267
A-3-68 CAS NUMBER 124-48-1: DmROMOCHLOROMETHANE A-3-270
A-3-69 CAS NUMBER 95-50-1: DICHLOROBENZENE, 1,2- A-3-273
A-3-70 CAS NUMBER 541-73-1: DICHLOROBENZENE, 1,3- A-3-276
A-3-71 CAS NUMBER 106-46-7: DICHLOROBENZENE, 1,4- A-3-279
A-3-72 CAS NUMBER 91-94-1: DICHLOROBENZIDINE, 3,3'- A-3-282
A-3-73 CAS NUMBER 75-71-8: DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE A-3-285
A-3-74 CAS NUMBER 75-34-3: DICHLOROETHANE, 1,1- A-3-288
A-3-75 CAS NUMBER 107-06-2: DICHLOROETHANE, 1,2- (ETHYLENE
BICHLORIDE) A-3-291
A-3-76 CAS NUMBER 75-35-4: DICHLOROETHYLENE, 1,1- A-3-294
A-3-77 CAS NUMBER 156-59-2: DICHLOROETHYLENE, CIS-1,2- A-3-297
A-3-78 CAS NUMBER 156-60-5: DICHLOROETHYLENE, 1,2(TRANS)- .. A-3-300
A-3-79 CAS NUMBER 120-83-2: DICHLOROPHENOL, 2,4- A-3-303
A-3-80 CAS NUMBER 78-87-5: DICHLOROPROPANE, 1,2- A-3-306
A-3-81 CAS NUMBER 542-75-6: DICHLOROPROPENE, 1,3(CIS)- A-3-309
A-3-82 CAS NUMBER 62-73-7: DICHLORVOS A-3-312
U.S. EPA Region 6 U.S. EPA
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division Office of Solid Waste
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering A-3-54
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
ATTACHMENT
TABLES OF COMPOUND-SPECIFIC PARAMETER VALUES
(Page 5 of 10)
A-3-83 CAS NUMBER 60-57-1: DIELDRIN A-3-315
A-3-84 CAS NUMBER 84-66-2: DIETHYL PHTHALATE A-3-318
A-3-85 CAS NUMBER 131-11-3: DIMETHYL PHTHALATE A-3-321
A-3-86 CAS NUMBER 105-67-9: DBMETHYLPHENOL, 2,4- A-3-324
A-3-87 CAS NUMBER 119-90-4: DIMETHYOXYBENZIDINE, 3,3' A-3-328
A-3-88 CAS NUMBER 99-65-0: DINTTROBENZENE, 1,3- A-3-331
A-3-89 CAS NUMBER 51-28-5: DINTTROPHENOL, 2,4- A-3-334
A-3-90 CAS NUMBER 121-14-2: DINITROTOLUENE, 2,4- A-3-338
A-3-91 CAS NUMBER 606-20-2: DIMTROTOLUENE, 2,6- A-3-341
A-3-92 CAS NUMBER 123-91-1: DIOXANE, 1,4- A-3-344
A-3-93 CAS NUMBER 122-66-7: DBPHENYLHYDRAZINE, 1,2- A-3-347
A-3-94 CAS NUMBER 298-04-4: DISULFOTON A-3-350
A-3-95 CAS NUMBER 115-29-7: ENDOSULFANI A-3-353
A-3-96 CAS NUMBER 72-20-8: ENDRIN A-3-356
A-3-97 CAS NUMBER 106-89-8: EPICHLOROHYDRIN (1-CHLORO-
2,3-EPOXYPROPANE) A-3-359
A-3-98 CAS NUMBER 97-68-2: ETHYL METHACRYLATE A-3-362
A-3-99 CAS NUMBER 62-50-0: ETHYL METHANESULFONATE A-3-365
A-3-100 CAS NUMBER 100-41-4: ETHYLBENZENE ,....« .... A-3-368
A-3-101 CAS NUMBER 106-93-4: ETHYLENE DIBROMIDE ... A-3-371
A-3-102 CAS NUMBER 75-21-8: ETHYLENE OXIDE A-3-374
A-3-103 CAS NUMBER 117-81-7: ETHYLHEXYL PHTHALATE, BIS-2- ... A-3-377
U.S. EPA Region 6 ! U.S. EPA
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division Office of Solid Waste
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering A-3-55
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
ATTACHMENT
TABLES OF COMPOUND-SPECIFIC PARAMETER VALUES
(Page 6 of 10)
A-3-104 CAS NUMBER 206-44-0: FLUORANTHENE A-3-380
A-3-105 CAS NUMBER 86-73-7: FLUORENE A-3-383
A-3-106 CAS NUMBER 50-00-0: FORMALDEHYDE A-3-386
A-3-107 CAS NUMBER 64-18-6: FORMICACID A-3-389
A-3-108 CAS NUMBER 35822-46-9: HEPTACDD, 1,23,4,6,7,8- A-3-392
A-3-109 CAS NUMBER 67562-39-4: HEPTACDF, 1,23,4,6,7,8- A-3-395
A-3-110 CAS NUMBER 55673-89-7: HEPTACDF, 1,2,3,4,7,8,9- A-3-398
A-3-111 CAS NUMBER 76-44-8: HEPTACHLOR A-3-401
A-3-112 CAS NUMBER 1024-57-3: HEPTACHLOR EPOXTOE A-3-404
A-3-113 CAS NUMBER 39227-28-6: HEXACDD, 1,23,4,7,8- A-3-407
A-3-114 CAS NUMBER 57653-85-7: HEXACDD, 1,2,3,6,7,8- A-3-410
A-3-115 CAS NUMBER 19408-74-3: HEXACDD, 1,23,7,8,9- A-3-413
A-3-116 CAS NUMBER 70648-26-9: HEXACDF, 1,23,4,7,8- A-3-416
A-3-117 CAS NUMBER 57117-44-9: HEXACDF, 1,23,6,7,8- A-3-419
A-3-118 CAS NUMBER 72918-21-9: HEXACDF, 1,23,7,8,9- A-3-422
A-3-119 CAS NUMBER 60851-34-5: HEXACDF, 23,4,6,7,8- A-3-425
A-3-120 CAS NUMBER 87-68-3: HEXACHLORO-13-BUTADIENE
(PERCHLOROBUTADIENE) A-3-428
A-3-121 CAS NUMBER 118-74-1: HEXACHLOROBENZENE A-3-431
A-3-122 CAS NUMBER 77-47-4: HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADHCNE .. A-3-434
A-3-123 CAS NUMBER 67-72-1: HEXACHLOROETHANE
(PERCHLOROETHANE) A-3-437
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-56
-------
Human Health Bisk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
ATTACHMENT
TABLES OF COMPOUND-SPECIFIC PARAMETER VALUES
(Page 7 of 10)
A-3-124
A-3-12S
A-3-126
A-3-127
A-3-128
A-3-129
A-3-130
A-3-131
A-3-132
A-3-133
A-3-134
A-3-135
A-3-136
A-3-137
A-3-138
A-3-139
A-3-140
A-3-141
A-3-142
A-3-143
CAS NUMBER 70-30-4: HEXACHLOROPHENE A-3-440
CAS NUMBER 7647-01-0: HYDROGEN CHLORIDE A-3-443
CAS NUMBER 193-39-5: INDENO(1,2,3-CD)PYRENE A-3-446
CAS NUMBER 78-59-1: ISOPHORONE A-3-449
CAS NUMBER 7439-92-1: LEAD A-3-452
CAS NUMBER 121-75-5: MALATHIONE , A-3-455
CAS NUMBER 7487-94-7: MERCURIC CHLORIDE A-3-458
CAS NUMBER 7439-97-6: MERCURY A-3-462
METHACRYLONITRILE A-3-465
METHANOL A-3-468
METHOXYCHLOR A-3-471
METHYL ACETATE A-3-474
CAS NUMBER 126-98-7:
CAS NUMBER 67-56-1:
CAS NUMBER 72-43-5:
CAS NUMBER 79-20-9:
CAS NUMBER 74-83-9:
CAS NUMBER 74-87-3:
CAS NUMBER 78-93-3:
METHYL BROMIDE
(BROMOMETHANE) A-3-477
METHYL CHLORIDE
(CHLOROMETHANE) A-3-480
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
(2-BUTANONE) A-3-483
CAS NUMBER 108-10-1: METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE A-3-486
CAS NUMBER 22967-92-6: METHYL MERCURY A-3-489
CAS NUMBER 298-00-0: METHYL PARATHION A-3-492
CAS NUMBER 74-95-3: METHYLENE BROMIDE A-3-495
CAS NUMBER 75-09-2: METHYLENE CHLORIDE A-3-49
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S.EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-57
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
ATTACHMENT
TABLES OF COMPOUND-SPECIFIC PARAMETER VALUES
(Page 8 of 10)
A-3-144 CAS NUMBER 91-20-3: NAPHTHALENE A-3-501
A-3-145 CAS NUMBER 7440*02-0: NICKEL A-3-504
A-3-146 CAS NUMBER 88-74-4: NITROANDLINE, 2- A-3-507
A-3-147 CAS NUMBER 99-09-2: NTTROANILINE, 3- A-3-510
A-3-148 CAS NUMBER 100-01-6: NITROANBLINE, 4- A-3-513
A-3-149 CAS NUMBER 98-95-3: NITROBENZENE A-3-516
A-3-150 CAS NUMBER 88-75-5: NTTROPHENOL, 2- A-3-519
A-3-151 CAS NUMBER 100-02-7: NTTROPHENOL, 4- A-3-522
A-3-152 CAS NUMBER 924-16-3: NITROSO-DI-N-BUTYLAMINE, N- A-3-525
A-3-153 CAS NUMBER 86-30-6: NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE, N- A-3-528
A-3-154 CAS NUMBER 621-64-7: NTTROSODIPROPYLAMINE, N A-3-531
A-3-155 CAS NUMBER 3268-87-9: OCTACDD, 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9- A-3-534
A-3-156 CAS NUMBER 39001-02-0: OCTACDF, 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9- A-3-537
A-3-157 CAS NUMBER 40321-76-4: PENTACDD, 1,2,3,7,8- A-3-540
A-3-158 CAS NUMBER 57117-41-6: PENTACDF, 1,2,3,7,8- A-3-543
A-3-159 CAS NUMBER 57117-31-4: PENTACDF, 2,3,4,7,8- A-3-546
A-3-160 CAS NUMBER 608-93-5: PENTACHLOROBENZENE A-3-549
A-3-161 CAS NUMBER 82-68-8: PENTACHLORONITROBENZENE
(PCNB) A-3-552
A-3-162 CAS NUMBER 87-86-5: PENTACHLOROPHENOL A-3-555
A-3-163 CAS NUMBER 85-01-8: PHENANTHRENE A-3-559
A-3-164 CAS NUMBER 108-95-2: PHENOL A-3-562
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-58
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
ATTACHMENT
TABLES OF COMPOUND-SPECIFIC PARAMETER VALUES
(Page 9 of 10)
CAS NUMBER 298-02-2: PHORATE ... A-3-565
A-3-165
A-3-166
A-3-167
A-3-168
A-3-169
A-3-170
A-3-171
A-3-172
A-3-173
A-3-174
A-3-175
A-3-176
A-3-177
A-3-178
A-3-179
A-3-180
A-3-181
A-3-182
A-3-183
A-3-184
CAS NUMBER 85-44-9:
PHTHALIC ANHYDRIDE (1,2-BENZENE
DICARBOXYLIC ANHYDRIDE) A-3-568
CAS NUMBER 23950-58-5: PRONAMTOE A-3-571
CAS NUMBER 129-00-0:
CAS NUMBER 110-86-1:
CAS NUMBER 299-84-3:
CAS NUMBER 94-59-1:
PYRENE A-3-574
PYRDMNE A-3-577
RONNEL , A-S-SSO
SAFROLE . A-3-583
CAS NUMBER 7782-49-2: SELENIUM A-3-586
CAS NUMBER 7440-22-4: SILVER A-3-589
CAS NUMBER 57-24-9: STRYCHNINE A-3-592
CAS NUMBER 100-42-5: STYRENE A-3-595
CAS NUMBER 1746-01-6: TETRACDD, 2,3,7,8- A-3-598
CAS NUMBER 51207-31-9: TETRACDF, 2,3,7,8- A-3-601
CAS NUMBER 95-94-3: TETRACHLOROBENZENE, 1,2,4,5- .... A-3-604
CAS NUMBER 630-20-6: TETRACHLOROETHANE, 1,1,1,2- A-3-607
TETRACHLOROETHANE, 1,1,2,2- A-3-610
CAS NUMBER 79-34-5:
CAS NUMBER 127-18-4: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
(PERCHLOROETHYLENE) A-3-613
CAS NUMBER 58-90-2: TETRACHLOROPHENOL, 2,3,4,6- A-3-616
CAS NUMBER 109-99-9: TETRAHYDROFURAN A-3-619
CAS NUMBER 7440-28-0: THALLIUM (L) A-3-622
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-59
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-3
July 1998
ATTACHMENT
TABLES OF COMPOUND-SPECIFIC PARAMETER VALUES
(Page 10 of 10)
A-3-185 CAS NUMBER 108-88-3:
A-3-186 CAS NUMBER 95-53-4:
A-3-187 CAS NUMBER 87-61-6:
A-3-188 CAS NUMBER 120-82-1:
A-3-189 CAS NUMBER 71-55-6:
A-3-190 CAS NUMBER 79-00-5:
A-3-191 CAS NUMBER 79-01-6:
A-3-192 CAS NUMBER 75-69-4:
A-3-193 CAS NUMBER 95-95-4:
A-3-194 CAS NUMBER 88-06-2:
A-3-195 CAS NUMBER 96-18-4:
A-3-196 CAS NUMBER 108-67-8:
A-3-197 CAS NUMBER 99-35-4:
A-3-198 CAS NUMBER 118-96-7:
A-3-199 CAS NUMBER 108-05-4:
A-3-200 CAS NUMBER 75-01-4:
A-3-201 CAS NUMBER 108-38-3:
A-3-202 CAS NUMBER 95-47-6:
A-3-203 CAS NUMBER 106-42-3:
A-3-204 CAS NUMBER 7440-66-6:
TOLUENE A-3-625
TOLUTOINE, o- A-3-628
TRICHLOROBENZENE, 1,2,3- A-3-631
TRICHLOROBENZENE, 1,2,4- A-3-634
TRICHLOROETHANE, 1,1,1- A-3-637
TRICHLOROETHANE, 1,1,2- A-3-640
TRICHLOROETHYLENE A-3-643
TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
(FREON11) A-3-646
TRICHLOROPHENOL, 2,4,5- A-3-649
TRICHLOROPHENOL, 2,4,6- A-3-652
TRICHLOROPROPANE, 1 A3- A-3-655
TREMETHYLBENZENE, 1,3,5- A-3-658
TRINTTROBENZENE, 1,3,5(SYM)- A-3-661
TRINITROTOLUENE, 2,4,6- A-3-664
VINYL ACETATE A-3-667
VINYL CHLORIDE A-3-670
XYLENE,m- A-3-673
XYLENE, o- A-3-676
XYLENE,p- A-3-679
ZINC A-3-682
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-3-60
-------
TABLE A-3-1
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ACENAPHTHENE (83-32-9)
(Page 1 of 4)
...." ^Parameter"
MF(g/mole)
rm(K)
Vp(&tai)
S(mg/L)
/T(atm-m3/mol)
A,(cm2/s)
Av(cm2/s)
^rw (unitless)
*«(mL/g)
JG4(cm3/g).
/&/w(L/Kg)
»j * » ^ Reference and Explanation ' /* ' ~>
JEtflHtaMons v ~ **
Vate*"*" A
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
# value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl,
and Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was
calculated by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Devalue was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1 996b).
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^. that is
cited in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in
soil. Measured organic carbon hi soil, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kda because the value varies, depending on the fraction of
organic carbon in soil. Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the
Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kdn value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km mat is
cited in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in
suspended sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment,
specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value
varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment.
Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table.
—
—
-
..
B-l-6; B-2-6; B-2-8;
B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6; B-4-21
B-4-20
-.
-.
B-l-3; B-l-4; B-l-5;
B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4; B-2-5;
B-2-6; B-2-10; B-3-
3; B-3-4; B-3-5; B-3-
6;B-4-3;B-4-4;
B-4-5; B-4-6;
B-4-10;B-4-ll
B-4-16; B-4-18;
B-4-24
154.21
368.1
4.93E-06
at25°C
(solid)
3.80E+00
2.00E-04
4.21E-02
7.19E-06
9.22E+03
4.90E+03
4.90E+01
3.67E+02
A-3-61
-------
TABLE A-3-1
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ACENAPHTHENE (83-32-9)
(Page 2 of 4)
Eauations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Kdu value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is
cited in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in
bottom sediment Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to
site conditions, should be used to calculate Kdts, because the value varies,
depending on the fraction of organic carbon in bottom sediment.
Recommended Kdt, value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in this table.
B-4-16; B-4-25
1.96E+02
fog- (year)'1
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited hi
Howard, Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
2.48E+00
Fv (unltiess)
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited hi Junge (1977) and
Bidleman (1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and
Vp values that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was
converted to a liquid-phase value before being used hi the calculations.
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-l;B-3-7;B-3-8;
B-4-1; B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
0.999975
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, pglg DW plant .
*ftg/mL soil water'
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
cited in Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry
weight basis by using a moisture content of 87 percent.
B-2-10
2.69E+02
(•
Hgfg DW plant.
pg/g soil
value w38 calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value
provided in this table.
B-2-10
5.48E+00
DWplant
pglg soil
Braz value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by
using the K^, value that is provided in this table.
B-2-9
1.98E-01
Hgfg soil
value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by
using the Km value that is provided hi this table.
B-3-9
1.98E-01
A-3-62
-------
TABLE A-3-1
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ACENAPHTHENE (83-32-9)
(Page 3 of 4)
> • Parameter <
*W
fUg/g DW plant^
\ , . )
Hg/g air
BVforap
^glg DW plant j
l*g/g air
Bamttk (day/kg FW)
fla^ (day/kg FW)
&^>t (day/kg FW)
flaear (day/kg FW)
£«,**» (day/kg FW)
*CFj»
(L/kgFW tissue)
AiFj^CL/kgFW)
BSAFfl,h (unitless)
: Reference and Explanation '
IRffllfltfofiS
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Plants (Continued)
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H
that is cited in Bacci, Calamari, Qaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci,
Cerejeira, Gaggi, Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1 992); then reducing this
value by a factor of 100. No distinction was made between values for
leafyaboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated,
for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the #and Km values that are provided
in this table.
Bv frag* value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H
that is cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci,
Cerejeira, Gaggi, Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this
value by a factor of 100. No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and K^ values that are provided in
this table.
B-2-8
B-3-8
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamiik value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by
using the Km value that is provided in this table.
Ba^tf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by
using the Km value that is provided in this table.
Ba^t value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef
(23/19) and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Baegg value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
cited in California EPA (1993). Recommended value"was calculated by using
the KO, value that is provided in this table.
Sicucta, value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef
(15/19) and multiplying it with the Ba,^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation with
KM, obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980)— See Appendix
A-3.
-
~
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
4.66E+00
4.66E+00
7.32E-05
2.31E-04
2.80E-04
7.32E-02
1.83E-04
6.07E402
NA
NA
A-3-63
-------
TABLE A-3-1
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ACENAPHTHENE (83-32-9)
(Page 4 of 4)
Parameter
RfD (mg/kg/day)
OralCSF
(mg/kg/dayy1
^(mgfta3)
Inhalation URF
(Mi/m3)'1
Inhalation CSF
(me/kg/day)"1
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Health Benchmarks
U.S.EPA (1997b)
-
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
Value
6.00E-02
ND
2.10E-01
ND
ND
Note:
NA - Not applicable
ND ™ No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-64
-------
TABLE A-3-2
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ACETALDEHYDE (75-07-0)
(Page 1 of 4)
Parameter
1
Reference and Exolanation
Chemical/Physical Properties
MT(g/mole)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
44.05
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
149.6
ND
S(mg/L)
ND
#(atnvm3/mol)
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
ND
A,(cm2/s)
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
2.72E-01
A,(cm2/s)
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
B-4-20
1.33E-05
Recommended.^value cited inKarickhoff andLong (1995).
6.02E-01
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for phthalates
and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phtbalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans,
cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). Kx value was calculated by using the recommended K^
value that is provided in this table.
9.53E-01
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with KK that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon hi soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate/^,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon hi soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in
this table.
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
9.53E-03
Kd^fL/Kg)
Kd^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate KdM because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended' Kdm value
was calculated by using the Kac value that is provided in this table.
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
7.15E-02
A-3-65
-------
TABLE A-3-2
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ACETALDEHYDE (75-07-0)
(Page 2 of 4)
Parameter
JS4,(cmVg)
ksg(ycar)-1
Fv (unitiess)
RCF
, t*g/g DW plant .
* UglmL soil water'
Bfna-Ht
.tigtg DWplant^
Hgtg soil
»W
.Uglg DW plant j
Uglg soil
Brj^.
.liglg DWplant^
^ pglg soil
*W
.H$lg DWplant^
Hg/g air
Reference and Explanation •• -
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Kdfr value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by
using the KK value that is provided in this table.
Ksg value was assumed to be 0 due to a lack of data.
Fv value was assumed to be 1.0 due to a lack of data.
Equations Value
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2;B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation vnfhKm that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Br^am value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table.
Br value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided hi this table.
Brf**sc v31116 w38 calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM, value that is provided hi this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
3.81E-02
0
1.000000
6.46E+00
6.78E+02
5.19E-H)!
5.19E+01
ND
A-3-66
-------
TABLE A-3-2
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ACETALDEHYDE (75-07-0)
(Page 3 of 4)
1\ Parameter •
,IJ.glg DW plant ,
/J.g/g air
—
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
&%„,, (day/kg FW)
Bapork (day/kg FW)
Baegg (day/kg FW)
5«cwd», (day/kg FW)
(L/kg FW tissue)
&4F^A(L/kgFW)
BSAFfi,,, (unitless)
^(mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
.R>C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
. . . • . Reference and Explanation
Biotransfer Factors for Plants (Continued)
—
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamilk value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated % using the Km
value that is provided in this table. ',' ""
Bataf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table. ""
Ripe* value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Baegg value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
BaMchn value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCFf,h value calculated using the correlation equation withA^,
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980)— See Appendix A-3. "*
-
-
Health Benchmarks
U.S. EPA (1996d)
U.S. EPA (1996d)
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997b)
Value based on Oral CSF assuming route-to-route extrapolation.
1 Equations •
B-3-8
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
1 Valae
is^sssssssi^sz
ND
4.78E-09
1.51E-08
1.83E-08
4.78E-06
1.19E-08
4.00E-01
NA
NA
2.6E-03
7.7E-03
9.00E-03
2.20E-06
7.70E-03
=-^=— — ^— .
A-3-67
-------
TABLE A-3-2
C3IEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ACETALDEHYDE (75-07-0)
(Page 4 of 4)
Note:
NA-Not applicable
ND » No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-68
-------
TABLE A-3-3
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ACETONE (67-64-1)
(Page 1 of 3)
..." Parameter
MF(g/mole)
T.(K)
Vp(atia)
S(mg/L)
//(atnvmVmol)
A,(cm2/s)
A,(cm2/s)
JKm, (unitless)
^(mL/g)
AdUcmVg)
Kdm(L/K.g)
'" * Reference and Explanation * "", " '
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman( 1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
ff value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Devalue was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994g).
K,,. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for phthalates
and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans,
cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). K^ value was calculated by using the recommended Km
value that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with KM that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 hi soil.
Measured organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to
calculate Kds, because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon
in soil. Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the KK value that is
provided in this table.
Kd^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon hi suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate KdM because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon hi suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^, value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Equations
~
—
-
~
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8;B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
—
~~
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;B-4-18;
B-4-24
' ' Vatee '
58.08
179.1
2.99E-01
at25°C
(liquid)
6.04E+05
2.88E-05
1.87E-01
1.15E-05
6.00E-01
9.51E-01
9.51E-03
7.13E-02
A-3-69
-------
r
TABLE A-3-3
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ACETONE (67-64-1)
(Page 2 of 3)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991)
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
3.61E+01
Fv (unitless)
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977).
Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in
the table.
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, ngfg DW plant .
* UglmL soil water
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
B-2-10
6.46E+00
DWplant
pglg soil
•)
value was calculated by dividing the .RCF value with the Kd, value
provided in this table.
B-2-10
6.80E+02
DWplant
soil
•)
Br^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produceand forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
B-2-9
5.20E+01
Brjhrgge value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
B-3-9
,l*g/g DWplant^
pglg soil
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegorund and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
5.20E+01
tl*g/g DW plant N
(. vv .— . )
ftg/g air
Bvlt^>veg value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that
is cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100.
No distinction was made between values for abovegorund produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided in this table.
B-2-8
1.13E-03
ftg/g air
value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and ffthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided in this table.
B-3-8
1.13E-03
A-3-70
-------
TABLE A-3-3
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ACETONE (67-64-1)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
- . Reference and Explanation - -
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamttt (day/kg FW)
fla^day/kgFW)
Bapork (day/kg FW)
Baesg (day/kg FW)
.BacWcte, (day/kg FW)
*CFjM
(L/kgFW tissue)
A4F^(L/kgFW)
BSAFfrk (unitless)
5amat value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ef value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA^, that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^t value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^^ value.
Baegg value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
Bachicken value was calculated by using the fet content ratio of chicken to beef
(15/19) and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF values were geometric mean laboratory or field derived
values obtained from various literature sources cited in U.S. EPA (1998) — See
Appendix A-3.
-
-
" Equations
Value
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
4.77E-09
1.51E-08
1.82E-08
4.77E-06
1.19E-08
4.00E-01
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Ora/ CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
*/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(^g/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
U.S.EPA (1997b)
~ • •
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
l.OOE-01
ND
3.50E-01
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-71
-------
r
TABLE A-3-4
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ACETONITRILE (75-05-8)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MT(gAnole)
rw(K)
Vp (atm)
S(mg/L)
//(ttavmVmol)
D.(cmVs)
A,(cmVs)
A^,(unitless)
/^(mL/g)
*y,(cmVg)
*yw(L/Kg)
Reference and Explanation * • •
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckehnan (1989)
Howard (1989-1993)
Howard (1989-1993)
//value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
De value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dv value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
log KW value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1 995).
KM value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for phthalates
and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans,
cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). KK value was calculated by using the recommended Km
value that is provided in this table.
Kds value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculated,,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Kac value that is provided in
this table.
Kdm value was calculated by using the correlation equation with KK that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate KdM because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^, value
was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in this table.
-
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
"
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
41.05
318.1
1.20E-01
at25°C
(solid)
1.30E-01
3.79E+01
3.14E-01
1.40E-05
4.57E-01
7.69E-01
7.69E-03
5.76E-02
A-3-72
-------
TABLE A-3-4
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ACETONITRILE (75-05-8)
(Page 2 of 3)
„ Parameter
ksg (year)'1
Fv(unitless)
RCF
, fj,glg DW plant .
" uglmL soil water'
Bf root teg
,Hglg DW plant.
(j,glg soil
*ag
,riglg DW plant.
Hg/g soil
fyorage
,riglg DW plant.
t*g/g soil
,t*g/g DW plant.
Uglg air
Bvforage
,/tg/g DW plant.
pg/g air
Reference and Explanation ' ' ' , j .Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that
are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8;B-4-l;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in this table. The valus was then converted to a dry wight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Brrootveg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table.
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for abovegrouns
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Brforage value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1 988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegorund produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and # that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM values that are provided in this table.
Bvfomge value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
9.03E+00
1.000000
6.43E+00
8.37E+02
6.09E+01
6.09E+01
6.41E-10
6.41E-10
A-3-73
-------
TABLE A-3-4
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ACETONITRILE (75-05-8)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
tfoj^day/kg FW)
Ba^t (day/kg FW)
Bam (day/kg FW)
Sfldtoto. (day/kg FW)
«3fA»
(L/kgFW tissue)
B^(L/kgFW)
BSAF/u, (unitless)
Ba^t value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Bataf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided hi this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^f value.
Ba,^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
.Bflcwaoi value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCFM value calculated using the correlation equation with A,,,
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
-
—
B-3-11
B-3-10
•-B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Value
3.63E-09
1.15E-08
1.39E-08 j
3.63E-06
9.06E-09
3.25E-01
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
R/D (mg/kg/day)
Oo/CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
J?/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
O^gto')-1
Inhalation CSF
ftng/kg/day)"1
U.SJ2PA (1997b)
-
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
6.00E-03
ND
2.10E-02
ND
ND
Note:
NA » Not applicable
ND " No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-74
-------
TABLE A-3-5
MF(g/mole)
//(atm-mVmol)
A,(cm2/s)
A,(cm2/s)
•"••••••••••••••••••••••••I
J^ (unitless)
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ACETOPHENONE (98-86-2)
(Page 1 of 3)
—'-
anatioa
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neill, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari. O'Neill, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
—
120.50
293.6
5.20E-04
at25°C
(solid)
H value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995).
Kac value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furansas cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). Kx value was calculated by using the recommended K value
that is provided in this table.
B-4-20
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with KK that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate &/„
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon Jn soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the AL value that is provided in
this table.
Kd^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kx that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate KdM because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd value
was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in this table.
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
6.10E+03
1.03E-05
6.00E-02
8.73E-06
4.37E-H)1
^HM^HBH^Bim
2.69E+01
2.69E-01
B-4-16;
B-4-18; Br4-24
2.02E+00
A-3-75
-------
TABLE A-3-5
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ACETOPHENONE (98-86-2)
(Page 2 of 3)
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Value
Fv (unitless)
Ksg value was assumed to be 0 due to a lack of data.
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that
are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
0.0
0.999999
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
t yg/g DW plant .
soil water'
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
B-2-10
1.06E+01
Br,
rvotvtg
DW plant
Br^ng value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table.
B-2-10
3.92E+01
DW plant
pgfg soil
v value was calculated by using the correlation equation with KM that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
B-2-9
4.37E+00
Br.
.ftg/g
pgfg soil
value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM value that is provided in this table.
B-3-9
4.37E+00
Bv.
,yg/g
(iglg air
Bv value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the Hand K^ values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-8
Bv,
>•*•
DW plant
air
Bvfara value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
cited ta Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided hi this
table. .
B-3-8
3.04E-01
3.04E-01
A-3-76
-------
TABLE A-3-5
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ACETOPHENONE (98-86-2)
(Page 3 of 3)
II Parameter
Bamm (day/kg FW)
&»4«Kday/kgFW)
Afcrt (day/kg FW)
5aeffi(day/kgFW)
AU*. (day/kg FW)
*CF*»
(L/kg FW tissue)
&4F^(L/kgFW)
5&4F^A (unitless)
-RjD(mg/kg/day)
OralCSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
/?/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
'• "" aBaaaaaBaaaaBaa
I " * Reference and Explanation ^ : • *"
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
s«mtf* value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table. m
B<*b«f value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table. ™
Bap,* value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Baegg value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
Back**** value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation withJ^
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980)— See Appendix A-3
- ••-.-.
-
Health Benchmarks
U.S. EPA (1997b) ,
—
Calculated from Oral RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 m3/day and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
—
~
1 Equations ' '
*^-^*™* '
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
4..*' Vatae •
3.47E-07
1.10E-06
1.33E-06
3.47E-04
8.66E-07
1.04E4fll
NA
NA
l.OOE-01
ND
3.50E-01
ND
ND
Note:
NA= Not applicable
ND= No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-77
-------
TABLE A-3-6
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ACROLEIN (107-02-8)
(Page 1 of 3)
——,=g==:^===^a=^^^=
Reference and Explanation
•••-—•«• _J [••" -Hi
Chemical/Physical Properties
W(g/mole)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
56.06
?(mg/L)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
185.1
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
3.50E-01
at25°C
(liquid)
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
2.10E+05
/f(atm-m3/mol)
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8;B-3-6;.
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
9.34E-05
D.(crn2/s)
D value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
1.92E-01
£>w(cmVs)
D value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
B-4-20
1.22E-05
AT_,(unitless)
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoffand Long (1995).
9.80E-01
KM value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans, cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). Kx value was calculated by using the recommended Km value
that is provided in this table. .
1.39E+00
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 hi soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate £4,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5;B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
1.39E-02
Kd^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
\J.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 hi suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate KdM because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon hi suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in this table.
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
1.05E-01
A-3-78
-------
TABLE A-3-6
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ACROLEIN (107-02-8)
(Page 2 of 3)
Reference and E
ksg (year)'
Fv (unitless)
RCF
. yg/g DW plant .
soil water'
Br,
rootveg
DWplant^
ftg/g soil
DW plant•,
•pg/g soil
Br,
forage
,/tg/g DWplant\
Bva,
f DW plant.
Hg/g air
Bv,
'forage
,/j.glg DW plant.
fj-g/g air
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited hi Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A^, that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
in this table.
value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd value provided
nltlA . "
Rvalue was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited hi
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K value that
is provided in this table.
Brfarage value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
cited hi Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Ji^, and tfthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100.
^o distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
9.03E400
1.000000
6.54E+00
4.69E+02
3.92E401
3.92E+01
5.86E-04
5.86E-04
A-3-79
-------
TABLE A-3-6
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ACROLEIN (107-02-8)
(Page 3 of 3)
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
&W* (day/kg FW)
5a^.(day/kgFW)
Ba^t (day/kg FW)
Bam (day/kg FW)
Ba^^ (day/kg FW)
5CF/&A
(L/kgFW tissue)
fciFjw.OL/kgFW)
BSAFf,* (unitless)
tyD (mg/kg/day)
OralCSF
(rag/kg/day)'1
#C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
fag/m3)'1
Mialatiort CSF
Bamttk value was calculated by using the correlation equation with AT^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba,,,f value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Baperk value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Baw value.
Ba value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Califomia EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
2tocWotoi value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCFju, value calculated using the correlation equation with£OT
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980)— See Appendix A-3.
_
_
Health Benchmarks
U.S. EPA (1997c)
-
U.S. EPA (1997)
-
-
Equations
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
'^••Vato*.;:;
7.78E-09
2.46E-08
2.98E-08
7.78E-06
1.94E-08
5.80E-01
NA
NA
2.0E-02
ND
2.0E-05
ND
ND
Note:
NA~ Not applicable
ND" No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-80
-------
TABLE A-3-7
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ACRYLONITRILE (107-13-1)
(Page 1 of 3)
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
53.06
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
189.6
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
1.40E-01
at25°C
(liquid)
S(mg/L)
lvalue cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
7.50E+04
/T(atm-m3/mol)
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
9.90E-05
A,(cm2/s)
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
2.11E-01
A,(cm2/s)
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
B-4-20
1.23E-05
^(unitless)
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995).
1.78E+00
KM value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans, cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). KK value was calculated by using the recommended Km value
that is provided in this table.
2.22E+00
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate^,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the K^. value that is provided in
this table.
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
2.22E-02
Kd^QJKg)
K4, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koe that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended KdM value
was calculated by using the gM value that is provided in this table.
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
1.66E-01
A-3-81
-------
TABLE A-3-7
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ACRYLONITMLE (107-13-1)
(Page 2 of 3)
uations
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Value
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
1.10E+01
Fv (unitless)
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
. yg/g DW plant .
% uglmL soil water
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
B-2-10
6.67E+00
,
UX/g DW plant ^
ttgfg soil
value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table.
B-2-10
3.00E+02
.yg/g DWpIant^
Uglg soil
Bra value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
B-2-9
2.77E+01
(t*g/g DWplant.
^ '-soil
Brg^g, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^w that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
!£„, value that is provided hi this table.
B-3-9
2.77E+01
DWplant
air
•)
Bv value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
B-2-8
1.04E-03
(•
pglg DWplant\
l*g/g air
_. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
citSta Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Kw values that are provided in this table.
B-3-8
1.04E-03
A-3-82
-------
TABLE A-3-7
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ACRYLONITRILE (107-13-1)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter <
Bamttk (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
B0park (day/kg FW)
5aeggl (day/kg FW)
JfcWto, (day/kg FW)
-SCF^
(L/kgFW tissue)
A^OAgFW)
££4/^4 (unitless)
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Ora/CSF
ing/kg/day)'1
/yCOng/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
4 " Reference and Explanation >:' ':
j* IRItnifltiofis ^
Valne s
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba»uk value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
B<*i*f value was calculated by using the correlation equation with.*^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided hi this table.
Ba^i value was calculated by using the fet content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Baeg& value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
Baa,ickn value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^g value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF values were geometric mean laboratory or field derived
values obtained from various literature sources cited in U.S. EPA (1998) — See
Appendix A-3.
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Health Benchmarks
U.S. EPA (1997c)
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997c)
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
1.41E-08
4.47E-08
5.41E-08
1.41E-05
3.53E-08
4.80E-H)1
MA
NA
l.OE-03
5.4E-01
2.0E-03
6.8E-05
2.4E-01
Note:
NA= Not applicable
ND= No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-83
-------
TABLE A-3-8
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ALDRBV (309-00-2)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
I 'Equations " I Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
W(g/mole)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
364.93
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
377.1
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1992).
2.90E-11
at25°C
(solid)
S(mg/L)
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1992).
7.84E-02
H(atm-m'/mol)
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated by
using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
1.35E-07
Dt (cmVs)
D value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
1.43E-02
£L(cma/s)
£>w value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
B-4-20
4.40E-06
, (unitless)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994f).
1.51E+06
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
4.87E+04
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd,,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon hi soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in this
table.
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
4.87E+02
Kd^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^. that is cited in U.S.
EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction oF 0.075 in suspended sediment
Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kd^> because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic
carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by using the
Kge value that is provided in this table.
B-4-16;
B-4-18;
B-4-24
3.65E+03
Kdi, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in U.S.
EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon hi bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be used
to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon
in bottom sediment Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by using the Kac value
that is provided hi this table.
B-4-16;
B-4-25
1.95E+03
A-3-84
-------
TABLE A-3-8
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ALDRIN (309-00-2)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter I
I Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)"'
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991)
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
4.28E-01
Fv (unitless)
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman (1988).
Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that are provided
in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a liquid-phase value before
being used in the calculations.
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
0.227325
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
fj.g/g DW plant
ig/mL soil wate
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
B-2-10
1.33E+04
Br.
noKeg
pg/g DW plant
fj-g/g soil
value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided in
this table.
B-2-10
2.73E+01
Uglg DW plant
Vglg soil
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table.
B-2-9
1.04E-02
DW plant
Hg/g soil
Brforafe value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. ™*
B-3-9
1.04E-02
Uglg DW plant
Hglg air
^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with JS^, and H that is cited
inBacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi, Chemello,
Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100. No distinction
was made between values for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value
was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the Hand K^ values that are
provided in this table.
B-2-8
1.58E406
Bv,
'Jbrage
DW plant
fj-g/g air
value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and //that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100. No
distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and
Km values that are provided in this table.
B-3-8
1.58E+06
A-3-85
-------
TABLE A-3-8
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ALDRIN (309-00-2)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
flo^a (day/kg FW)
Ba^day/kg FW)
&W (day/kg
FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Sfl^fctoCday^g
FW)
SCF^
(L/kg FW tissue)
Atf^OAgFW)
BSAFfa, (unitless)
jBa^/t value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA^, that is cited hi
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
Ba^i value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
JtocAttoi vaiue was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
-
BAFs were used for compounds with a log Km value above 4.0, as cited hi U.S. EPA
(1995b). BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying a food chain
multiplier (FCM) with an estimated BCF. BCFs were estimated using the correlation
equation obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980). FCMs were
obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc) — See Appendix A-3.
—
Equations
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Health Benchmarks
fl/D (mg/kg/day)
Ora/CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
/yC(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
teg/in1)-1
Inhalation CSF
(m2/kjz/davV'
U.S.EPA (1997b)
U.S.EPA (1997b)
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight of
70kg.
U.S.EPA (1997b)
U.S.EPA (1997c)
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
•- Value::*
1.20E-02
3.79E-02
4.59E-02
1.20E+01
2.99E-02
NA
5.82E+05
NA
3.00E-05
1.70E+01
1.10E-04
4.90E-03
1.70E+01
Note:
NA-Not applicable
ND « No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-86
-------
TABLE A-3-9
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ANILINE (62-53-3)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
' * Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties
MT(g/mole)
r.(K)
Vp(stm)
S(mg/L)
#(atm-m3/mol)
A,(cm2/s)
A,(cm2/s)
AT^, (unitless)
^(mL/g)
^(cmVg)
&L(L/Kg)
fog (year)'1
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
# value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Z>w value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995).
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). Koc value was calculated by using the recommended K^ value
that is provided in this table.
Kds value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the K,,,. value that is provided in
this table.
Kd^, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 hi suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon hi suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd.^, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
NCDEHNR(1996)
°fjQ tldtf OKS
Value •
_
—
-
—
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
—
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
93.12
266.8
8.80E-04
at25°C
(liquid)
3.60E+04
2.28E-06
8.56E-01
1.01E-05
9.55E+00
8.23E+00
8.23E-02
6.17E-01
3.20E-H)!
A-3-87
-------
TABLE A-3-9
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ANILINE (62-53-3)
(Page 2 of 3)
Reference and Explanation
j Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Fv (unitless)
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7;B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
0.999999
' Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
DW plant
^ftgfrnL soil water'
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with-K^, that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
B-2-10
7.63E+00
,(tg/g DW plant.
pglg soil
Brmarfg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table (see section A4.3.2 of Appendix A-3).
B-2-10
9.27E+01
(Hglg DW plant.
V '-soil '
Breg value was calculated by using the correlation equation with i that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
B-2-9
1.05E+01
.UPS DW plant.
Uglg soil
value w38 calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
!£„, value that is provided in this table.
B-3-9
1.05E+01
.yglg DW plant.
(iglg air
Bv^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the Hand K^ values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-9
2.72E-01
(t*g!g DW plant.
Hg/g air
value was calculated by using the correlation equation with/^ and .//that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25'C, by using the H and K^ values that are provided in this
table.
B-3-9
2.72E-01
A-3-S
-------
TABLE A-3-9
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ANILINE (62-53-3)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Bamm (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
£s(L/kgFW)
S&4F^ (unitless)
RfD (mg/kg/day)
OralCSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
*/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/rn3)'1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
Reference and Explanation
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
£am0t value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table. °"
Bat*
-------
TABLE A-3-10
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ANTHRACENE (120-12-7)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter |
W(g/mole)
r«(K)
*}>(atm)
S(mg/L)
//(atm-m'/mol)
D. (cmVs)
Dw(cm2/s)
^(unifless)
STK(mL/g)
&/,(cmVg)
Ai^CIVKg)
/&4,(cm3/g)
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
H value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
D value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation withX,,,. that is cited in
U.3. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd,,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in
this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koq that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kd,,. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S* EPA (1993d) for an assumedorganic carbon fraction of 0.04 hi bottom
sediment Measured organic carbon m bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kd,,,, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment Recommended Kdts value was calculated by
using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
Equations
-
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
Value
178.22
491.1
3.35E-08
at25°C
(solid)
5.37E-02
1.11E-04
3.24E-02
7.74E-06
2.95E404
2.35E+04
2.35E+02
1.76E403
9.40E+02
A-3-90
-------
TABLE A-3-10
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ANTHRACENE (120-12-7)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)"1
teg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
5.50E-01
Fv (unitless)
^o^.ue was calculated ty using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using T and Vp values that
are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
0.999781
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
Mg/g DW plant .
soil water
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Bnggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weig
a moisture content of 87 percent
value that is
basis bv using
s
B-2-10
6.49E402
Br,
rootveg
,/ag/g DW plant.
soil
Br,
in
««{** value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
B-2-10
2.76E-HJO
DW plant
fj-glg soil
.
Rvalue was calculated by using the correlation equation with XL, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K value that
B-2-9
Br,
forage
,fj.g/g DW plant,
/J-g/g soil
Br<
in
pge value was calculated by using the correlation equation with-ST^, that is cited
-ravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Rvalue that is provided in this table.
B-3-9
1.01E-01
1.01E-01
,ftg/g DW plant.
pg/g air
value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, and H that is
cited in Bacci Calaman, Gai and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Ga
; then reduci
, ,
Cnemello, Calaman, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor o
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Rvalues that are provided in this table.
B-2-8
OO
2.90E+01
, DW plant.
pg/g air
%
-------
TABLE A-3-10
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ANTHRACENE (120-12-7)
(Page 3 of 3)
nm^sMtMsesssextssSm 'SrSFg8
Parameter I
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
JJaj^.(day/kgFW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Bam (day/kg FW)
BeUfcj*, (day/kg FW)
JSO^i
(L/kg FW tissue)
a
-------
TABLE A-3-11
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ANTIMONY (7440-36-0)
(Page 1 of 3)
Reference and Explanation
— ^••••••••••^^••^•^^^^••'••••••••••iia
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
r.CK)
J£(atm)
S(mg/L)
#(atnvm3/mol)
A,(cm2/s)
A,(cm2/s)
A^, (unitless)
^(mL/g)
Ai/, (mL/g)
fit (IVKg)
fit (mL/g)
fag (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
All metals, except mercury, are assumed to be nonvolatile at ambient
temperatures.
All metals, except mercury, are assumed to be insoluble in water.
/Tvalue is assumed to be zero, because the Vp and S values are zero for all
metals, except mercury.
Da value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
£w value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
-
-
Kd value was obtained from U.S. EPA (1996a), which provides pH-based
values that were estimated by using the MINTEQ2 geochemical speciation
model.
fit value is assumed to be same as the Kds value, because organic carbon
does not play a major role in sorption for the metals, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994t).
fit value is assumed to be same as the Kds value, because organic carbon
does not play a major role in sorption for the metals, as cited in
U.O. EtsrA. ^iy"4l).
-
Because they are nonvolatile, metals are assumed to be 100 percent in
particulate phase and zero percent in the vapor phase, as cited in
__
_
-
_
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
_
..
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16; B-4-18;
B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
121.75
903.1
0.0
NA
0.0
7.73E-02
8.96E-06
NA
NA
45atpH=6.8
45atpH=6.8
45atpH=6.8
ND
0.000000
A-3-93
-------
TABLE A-3-11
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ANTIMONY (7440-36-0)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter j
RCF
, t*g/g DW plant .
"uglmL soil water
Br,^
.yg/g DWplant^
Hg/g soil
*W
.Hg/g DW plant ^
(tg/g soil
Br^
.ygtg DW plant.
Hg/g soil
Br^
^fig/g DWplant^
ftg/g soil
**«
,l*g/g DW plant^
pg/g air
BY**,,
,ltgtg DW plant ^
t*g/g air
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
|JJaw(day/kgFW)
Reference and Explanation
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
—
5r value was obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sioreen, and Shor (1984). Br
values for nonvegetative growth (such as tubers) in Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and
Shor (1984) were used for BrrooMg.
Br value for fruits was obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984).
Br values for nonvegetative growth (reproductive) in Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and
Shor (1984) were used for Br,. (fruits). Br value for vegetables was
calculated using data obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984).
Br values for nonvegetative (reproductive) growth andfiv values for vegetative
growth weighted as 75% (reproductive) and 25% vegetative (Baes, Sharp,
Sjoreen, andShor [1984])— were used for Br^ (vegetables).
The weighted average Bra, value for aboveground produce was obtained as
follows- (1) Br values for fruits combined with a human consumption rate of
fruits of 1.44E-03 kg/kg/day, and (2) Brag values for vegetables combined with
a human consumption rate of vegetables of 1.49E-03 kg/kg/day.
Br^. value was obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984). Bv
values for vegetative growth (such as leaves and stems) in Baes, Sharp,
Sjoreen, and Shor (1984) were used for Brforage.
Br-^value was obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984). Br
values for nonvegetative growth as recommended by Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, ana
Shor (1984) were used for Br^^.
Metals are assumed to not experience air-to-leaf transfer, as cited in
U.S.EPA(1995b).
Metals are assumed to not experience air-to-leaf transfer, as cited hi
U.S. EPA (1995b).
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamai values were obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984) for all
metals, except cadmium, mercury, selenium, and zinc.
Ba^ values were obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984) for all
metals, except cadmium, mercury, selenium, and zinc.
Equations 1 Value
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-8
B-3-8
B-2-8
B-3-8
B-3-11
B-3-10
ND
3.00E-02
3.19E-02
2.00E-01
2.00E-01
NA
NA
l.OE-04
l.OE-03
A-3-94
-------
TABLE A-3-11
CHEMICAJL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ANTIMONY (7440-36-0)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter '
Bapork (day/kg FW)
Baegg (day/kg FW)
*W*. (day/kg FW)
(L/kgFW tissue)
£4^ (L/kgFW)
BSAF^ (unitless)
RJD (mg/kg/day)
OralCSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
/?/U(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
G"g/m3)-'
Inhalation CSF
mg/kg/day)"1
Reference and Explanation
Biotransfer Factors for Animals (Continued)
_
-
- ' •
Geometric mean value obtained from various literature sources (see Appendix
,Aj»*rJ.
-
-•
Health Benchmarks
U.S. EPA (1995d)
-
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 m'/day and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
-
—
Equations- '-' >
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
f Value ,'
ND
ND
ND
4.00E+01
NA
NA
4.0E-04
ND
1.43E-03
ND
ND
Note:
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii
A-3-95
-------
TABLE A-3-12
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR AROCLOR 1016 (12674-11-2)
(Page 1 of 3)
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties
W(g/mole)
r*(K)
Vp(atm)
S(mg/L)
vfiT(atm-m3Anol)
A, (cmVs)
Dw(onVs)
K^,(unitless)
/^(mLfe)
^(cm'/g)
^(L/Kg)
J&kOanVg)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
—
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
//value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided hi this table.
Da value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Dw value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
KM value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for phthalates
and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans,
cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). Kx value was calculated by using the recommended K^
value that is provided in this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0( that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate /&/„
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kol. that is cited hi
U.§! EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site ,
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon hi suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the K^. value that is provided in this table.
Kd,.. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^. that is cited in
U.s! EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kd^,, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by
using the Kx value mat is provided in this table.
Equations
-
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
Value
257.9
ND
9.37E-07
at25°C
(liquid)
5.71E-01
4.23E-04
4.69E-02
5.43E-06
2.53E+05
2.32E+04
2.32E+02
1.74E403
9.29E+02
A-3-96
-------
TABLE A-3-12
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR AROCLOR 1016 (12674-11-2)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
' , Reference and Explanation
foliations
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Mackay, Shiu, and Ma (1992).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that
are provided in this table.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, ftg/g DW plant -
* l^.glmL soil water'
Brrooneg
,l*g/g DW plant.
f^g/g soil
*ag
,U.glg DW plant.
pg/g soil
Brforase
^glg DW plant.
pglg soil
*W
,/j.g/g DW plant.
pg/g air
BVf,rasf
,/tg/g DW plant.
Uglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroof,eg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in tiiis table.
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
Brtorage value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroudn produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
K^ value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor oflOO.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
Bvforfgf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and .ffthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor oflOO.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KO, values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
Value <•
5.06E400
0.999365
3.37E+03
1.45E+01
2.91E-02
2.91E-02
7.52E+01
7.52E+01
A-3-97
-------
TABLE A-3-12
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR AROCLOR 1016 (12674-11-2)
(Page 3 of 3)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
.Ba^t (day/kg FW)
£flw (day/kg FW)
Jffa.sfcto, (day/kg FW)
5CFM»
(UkgFW tissue)
JM^CL/kgFW)
BSAFju, (unitless)
S/D (mg/kg/day)
Oa/CSF
(rng/kg/day)-1
J^C(mgAn})
Inhalation URF
0/g/m1)-'
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/dayY1
BanSt value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Aims (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Saj, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with KV that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ba ,. value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the BaUff value.
Ba value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
BoMdm value Vfas calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
andmultiplymg it with the Ba^ value.
-
BAFs were used for compounds with a log Km value above 4.0, as cited in U.S. EPA
(1995b). BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying a food chain
multiplier (FCM) with an estimated BCF. BCFs were estimated using the
correlation equation obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980).
FCMs were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc) — See Appendix A-3.
_
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Health Benchmarks
U.S.EPA(1997b)
-
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
Value
2.01E-03
6.37E-03
7.71E-03
2.01E+00
5.03E-03
NA
5.33E+04
NA
7.00E-05
ND
2.5E-04
ND
ND
Note:
NA « Not applicable
ND * No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-98
-------
TABLE A-3-13
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR AROCLOR 1254 (11097-69-1)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter -
""•>• Reference and Explanation ] Equations
Vfiitic s
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
rm(K)
Vp (atm)
S(mg/L)
.ff(atm-m3/mol)
A,(cm2/s)
£>w(cm2/s)
Kn, (unitless)
^(mL/g)
^(cmVg)
Kd^(L/Kg)
Kdbs(cm3/g)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
J7 value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Dv value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, for phthalates
and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and fiirans,
cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). K^ value was calculated by using the recommended Km
value that is provided in this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with AT that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd,,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using (he K0. value that is provided in
this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 m suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate J&L, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^, value
was calculated by using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
Kdfr value was calculated by using the correlation equation with-ST^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon m bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdts, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
—
—
-
—
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
"
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
327.0
283.1
1.16E-07
at25°C
(liquid)
l.OOE-02
3.79E-03
4.00E-02
4.64E-06
1.61E+06
9.98E+05
9.83E+04
7.37E403
3.93E+03
A-3-99
-------
TABLE A-3-13
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR AROCLOR 1254 (11097-69-1)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
fog (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
^Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Mackay, Shiu, and Ma (1992).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited hi Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in the table.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Value
5.06E400
0.992833
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
,RCF
, ftg/g DW plant .
'l*g/mL soil water'
.pgtg DW plant ^
Hglg soil
tUglg DW plant-.
PSlg soil
.Uglg DW plant.
Hg/g soil
,f*glg DW plant \
Uglg air
.Uglg DW plant )
/jg/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K-, value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
^rooc*? value was calculated by dividing the jRCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table.
Bra, value was calculated by using the correlation equation withjK^, that is cited hi
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
B/V™ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in "Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegorund produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM, value that is provided in this table.
BVg, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and .ffthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and K^, values that are provided hi this table.
Bv- „ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided hi this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.40E+04
1.42E+01
l.OOE-02
l.OOE-02
6.01E+01
6.01E+01
A-3-100
-------
TABLE A-3-13
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR AROCLOR 1254 (11097-69-1)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Bamtlt (day/kg FW)
-Ba^day/kgFW)
•&W (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
-&Wto, (day/kg FW)
3CFJ*
(L/kg FW tissue) ,
A^OL/kgFW)
BSAFj,,,, (unitless)
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Graf CSF
[mg/kg/day)'1
RfC(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
'nhalation CSF
mg/kg/day)'1
"• ' Reference and Explanation
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
5flmtft value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K
value that is provided in this table. m
Babeef value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K
value that is provided in this table. m
Baj»rk value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K value
that is provided in this table. ™
BacMd** value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Babaf value.
-
BAFs were used for compounds with a log KM value above 4.0, as cited in U.S. EPA
(1995b). BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying a food chain
multiplier (FCM) with an estimated BCF. BCFs were estimated using the
correlation equation obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980)
FCMs were obtained from U.S. -EPA (1995bc>— See Appendix A-3.
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Health Benchmarks
U.S.EPA (1997b)
-
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
~
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
1.28E-02
4.05E-02
4.90E-02
1.28E+01
3.19E-02
NA
6.66E+05
NA
2.00E-05
ND
7.0E-05
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-101
-------
TABLE A-3-14
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ARSENIC (7440-38-2)
(Page 1 of 3)
Reference and Explanation ; y : v ,
. ^Equations- ;=-••'
Chemical/Physical Properties
W(g/mole)
rMCK)
PHatm)
5(mg/L)
#(atm-mVmol)
A,(cm2/s)
£>w(cmVs)
^(unitless)
^(mL/g)
A'4(mL/g)
A'rfw(L/Kg)
#4,(mL/g)
fegCyear)'1
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
All metals, except mercury, are assumed to be nonvolatile at ambient
temperatures.
All metals, except mercury, are assumed to be insoluble in water.
lvalue is assumed to be zero, because the Vp and S values are zero for all
metals, except mercury.
Da value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Dw value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
_
_
Kd, value was obtained from U.S. EPA (1996a), which provides pH-based
values that were estimated by using the MINTEQ2 geochemical speciation
model.
Kd^ value is assumed to be same as the Kd, value, because organic carbon
does not play a major role in sorption for the metals, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994f).
Kdt, value is assumed to be same as the Kds value, because organic carbon
does not play a major role in sorption for the metals, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994f).
-
~
~
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
--
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16; B-4-18;
B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
k.--'-;ValiwS'':iv-V;
74.92
1,091 at 36 atm
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.07E-01
1.24E-05
NA
NA
25 at pH=4.9;
29atpH=6.8;
31atpH=8.0
25atpH=4.9;
29atpH=6.8;
31atpH=8.0
25atpH=4.9;
29atpH=6.8;
31atpH=8.0
ND
A-3-102
-------
TABLE A-3-14
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ARSENIC (7440-38-2)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
'Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Fv (unitless)
Because they are nonvolatile, metals are assumed to be 100 percent in
particulate phase and zero percent in the vapor phase, as cited in
U.S.EPA(1994f).
Equations
Value
B-l-l;B-2-l;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
0.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
- Vg/g DW plant -
v fJ.glmL soil water'
BrrooMg
,IJ.glg DW plant.
{J-g/g soil
Brag
^glg DW plant.
pg/g soil
Brfarags
,Hg/g DW plant.
fj.glg soil
Brgnto
,(tg'g DW plant.
pg/g soil
Bvag
,IJ.glg DW plant.
Uglg air
Bvforage
,^glg DW plant^
\ i . >
Uglg air
Brrootveg value was calculated by multiplying the uptake slope factor with a
conversion factor of 2x10' g/ha soil. The uptake slope factor and the
conversion factor were obtained from U.S. EPA (1992b) for root vegetables.
Brag value for fruits was calculated by multiplying the uptake slope factor with
a conversion factor of 2 xlO9 g/ha soil. The uptake slope factor and the
conversion factor were obtained from U.S. EPA (1993e) for garden fruits. Br
value for vegetables was calculated by weighting the uptake slope factors for
garden fruits (75%) and leafy vegetables (25%) and multiplying the result
with a conversion factor of 2 xlO* g/ha soil. The uptake slope factors and the
conversion factor were obtained from U.S. EPA (1993e).
The weighted average Brag value for aboveground produce was obtained as
follows: (1) Bra. values for fruits combined with a human consumption rate of
fruits of 1.44E-03 kg/kg/day, and (2) Brag values for vegetables combined with
a human consumption rate of vegetables of 1.49E-03 kg/kg/day.
Brforage value was calculated by multiplying the uptake slope factor with a
conversion factor of 2 x 109 g/ha soil. The uptake slope factor and the
conversion factor were obtained from U.S. EPA (1992b) for leafy vegetables.
Br ^^ value was calculated by multiplying the uptake slope factors with a
conversion factor of 2 x 10' g/ha soil. The uptake slope factor and the
conversion factor were obtained from U.S. EPA (1992b) for grains/cereals.
Metals are assumed to not experience air-to-leaf transfer, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b).
Metals are assumed to not experience air-to-leaf transfer, as cited in '
U.S. EPA (1995b).
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-8
B-3-8
B-2-8
B-3-8
ND
8.00E-03
6.33E-03
3.60E-02
4.00E-03
NA
NA
A-3-103
-------
TABLE A-3-14
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ARSENIC (7440-38-2)
(Page 3 of 3)
Reference and Explanation 1 Equaeoiis
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
flflrfu (day/kg FW)
floj^Cday/kg FW)
J?^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
BaMm (day/kg FW)
(L/kg FW tissue)
&4FM(L/kgFW)
BSiFJw, (unitless)
JBfl^at values were obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984) for all
metals, except cadmium, mercury, selenium, and zinc.
Bai^f values were obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984) for all
metals, except cadmium, mercury, selenium, and zinc.
—
—
—
Geometric mean value obtained from various literature sources (see Appendix
ASA)
—
—
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Health Benchmarks
RJD (nag/kg/day)
OolCSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
J?/C (mgAn5)
Inhalation URF
teg/m5)-1
Inhalation CSF
froc/ks/dsyV
U.S. EPA (1997c)
U.S. EPA (1997b)
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 m3/day and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1996d)
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
t:^';-^?alue -"
6.0E-03
2.0E-03
ND
ND
ND
2.00E+01
NA
NA
3.0E-04
1.5E400
1.1E-03
4.3E-03
1.5E401
Note:
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-104
-------
TABLE A-3-15
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ATRAZINE (1912-24-9)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MF(g/mole)
r. * " Reference and Explanation ->
Enustioiis^ ^ t Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1 989)
Vp value cited in Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
S value cited in Howard and others 1989 - 1993
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation fiom Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
log Km value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995).
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for phthalates
and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and fiirans,
cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). Km value was calculated by using the recommended JEL,
value that is provided in this table.
Kd. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kdn
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in
this table.
Kd,,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to sue
conditions, should be used to calculate KdM because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in this table.
—
—
~
~
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
—
™*
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
215.68
444.1
3.66x10-'°
at25°C
(solid)
3.00E401
2.63E-09
2.80E-02
6.03E-06
4.07E+02
1.54E+02
1.54E+00
1.15E+01
A-3-105
-------
TABLE A-3-15
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ATRAZINE (1912-24-9)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
AT
-------
TABLE A-3-15
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ATRAZINE (1912-24-9)
(Page 3 of 3)
j Parameter •
Bamak (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
•Sa^t (day/kg FW)
5aeffi (day/kg FW)
#«cwdto, (day/kg FW)
^CFja
(L/kg FW tissue)
-ftiFjwOAgFW)
5S^A (unitless)
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Ora/ CSF
mg/kg/day)'1
#C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
Gug/m3)-1
nhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
> Reference and Explanation
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamak value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K
value that is provided in this table. m .
Batof value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by usine the IL.
value that is provided in this table.
Banprk value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
£a?ss.value w38 calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K value
mat is provided in this table.
•Btfctetai value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation with-K^
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980)— See Appendix A-3.
-
-
Health Benchmarks
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997b)
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
Calculated from oral CSF using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human bodv
weight of 70 kg. J
Value based on Oral CSF assuming route-to-route extrapolation.
Equations
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
ssssssssssssssssssssss
[ - Valne
'• '" ' ' a^*"
3.23E-06
1.02E-05
1.24E-05
3.23E-03
8.07E-06
5.67E+01
NA
NA
3.5E-02
2.2E-01
1.2E-01
6.3E-05
2.2E-01
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-107
-------
r
TABLE A-3-16
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BARIUM (7440-39-3)
(Page 1 of 3)
Chemical/Physical Properties
MJF(g/mole)
T«QQ
f>(atm)
S(mg/L)
tf(atm-m3/mol)
Z>,(cmVs)
Dw(cinVs)
K^Oinitless)
/CXmL/g)
Kd,(.mUg)
Kdn(LKg)
,&k(miyg)
fag (year)'1
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
All metals, except mercury, are assumed to be nonvolatile at ambient
temperatures.
All metals, except mercury, are assumed to be insoluble in water.
/Tvalue is assumed to be zero, because the Vp and S values are zero for all
metals, except mercury.
Da value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Devalue was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
_
_
Kd value was obtained from U.S. EPA (1996a), which provides pH-based
values that were estimated by using the MINTEQ2 geochemical speciation
model.
Kd value is assumed to be same as the Kds value, because organic carbon does
not play a major role in sorption for the metals, as cited in U.S. EPA (19941).
Kdt. value is assumed to be same as the Kd, value, because organic carbon does
not play a major role in sorption for the metals, as cited in U.S. EPA (19941).
-
Equations 1 Value
-
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6;B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
~
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18;
B-4-24
B-4-16;
B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
137.33
983
0.0
0.0
0.0
7.14E-02
8.26E-06
NA
NA
llatpH=4.9;
41atpH=6.8;
52atpH=8.0
llatpH=4.9;
41atpH=6.8;
52atpH=8.0
11 atpH=4.9;
41atpH=6.8;
52atpH=8.0
ND
A-3-108
-------
TABLE A-3-16
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BARIUM (7440-39-3)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
I Equations I Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Fv (unitless)
Because they are nonvolatile, metals are assumed to be 100 percent in
participate phase and zero percent in the vapor phase, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994f).
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7;B-2-8;
B-3-l;B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
0.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
DW plant
soil water
B-2-10
ND
Br,
rootveg
,lJ.g/g DW plant.
' ' soil
value was obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984). Br
lues for nonvegetative growth (such as tubers) in Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and
Shor (1984) were used forBrrool
B-2-10
1.50E-02
, DW plant,
/J.g/g soil
Brag value for fruits was obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984).
Br values for nonvegetative growth (reproductive) in Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and
Shor (1984) were used for Br^ (fruits). Br^ value for vegetables was calculated
using data obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984). Br values for
nonvegetative (reproductive) growth mdBv values for vegetative growth
weighted as 75% (reproductive) and 25% vegetative (Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and
Shor [1984])—were used for Br^ (vegetables).
The weighted average Brag value for aboveground produce was obtained as
follows: (1) Br values for fruits combined with a human consumption rate of
fruits of 1.44E-03 kg/kg/day, and (2) Br values for vegetables combined with a
human consumption rate of vegetables of 1.49E-03 kg/kg/day.
B-2-9
3.22E-02
Br,
,tig/g DW plant.
soil
value was obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984). Bv
values for vegetative growth (such as leaves and stems) in Baes, Sharp, Sioreen
and Shor (1984) were used for Brfarage.
B-3-8
1.50E-01
Br,
grain
DW plant
pg/g soil
.
'B'Vato value was obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984). Br
values for nonvegetative growth as recommended by Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and
Shor (1984) were used for Br^.
B-3-8
1.50E-02
Bv,,
(tg/g DW plant.
fj.g/g air
Metals are assumed to not experience air-to-leaf transfer, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b).
B-2-8
NA
Bv,
'forage
, DW plant.
Metals are assumed to not experience air-to-leaf transfer, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b).
B-3-8
air
NA
A-3-109
-------
TABLE A-3-16
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BARIUM (7440-39-3)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
BaM (day/kg FW)
BaiHf (day/kg FW)
Ba^t (day/kg FW)
Bfl^ (day/kg FW)
&UO*. (day/kg FW)
BCFja,
(L/kgFW tissue)
A4FM(UkgFW)
BSAFfA (unitless)
SJD (mg/kg/day)
Oo/CSF
(mg/kg/day)-'
^(mg/m*)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-'
Inhalation CSF
(tng/kg/day)
Reference and Explanation ''Y'-"--''v ;-:-">'':^'S'-^--}l>::;:i
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamia. values were obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984) for all
metals, except cadmium, mercury, selenium, and zinc.
Ba,^r values were obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984) for all
metals, except cadmium, mercury, selenium, and zinc.
—
—
—
-
—
—
Health Benchmarks
U.S.EPA(1997b)
-
U.S.EPA(1997b)
-
-
^.:;3Equanons,-''c'-'
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
^i^:v^Iue';^;s;>
3.5E-04
1.5E-04
ND
ND
ND
NA
NA
NA
7.0E-02
ND
5.0E-04
ND
ND
Note:
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-110
-------
TABLE A-3-17
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BENZALDEHYDE (100-52-7)
(Page 1 of 3)
> Parameter
MT(g/mole)
r« -- "Reference add Explanation -
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Vp value cited in NC DEHNR (1997).
S value cited in NC DEHNR (1997).
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Km value cited in NC DEHNR (1997).
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Ji^, for phthalates
and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and fiirans,
cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). K^ value was calculated by using the recommended K^
value that is provided in this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate^,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the K., value that is provided in
this table.
Kdg, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with .AT that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to sue
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Ka^ value
was calculated by using the Kac value that is provided in this table.
Etattfttioiis
Value
-
~
~
—
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
—
~~
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
106.12
329.6
1.30E-03
at25°C
(solid)
3.30E+03
4.18E-05
7.07E-02
9.48E-06
3.00E+01
2.01E-01
2.01E-01
1.51E+00
A-3-111
-------
TABLE A-3-17
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FORBENZALDEHYDE (100-52-7)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Kdi, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.s! EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment Measured organic carbon m bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the K^. value that is provided hi this table.
B-4-16; B-4-25
8.04E-01
ktg (year)'1
Ksg value assumed to be 0 due to a lack of data.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
0.0
Fv (unitless)
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that
are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a liquid
phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
DW plant
* pglmL soil water
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K value that is
provided hi this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
provided hi
a moisture content of 87 percent.
B-2-10
9.50
Br,
. DWplant\
pgtg soil
#r value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in mis table.
B-2-10
4.72E+01
Br.
.fig/g DW plant^
soil
Br.. value was calculated by using the correlation equation withX^,, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
B-2-9
5.42E+00
DW plant
value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
' No distinction was made between values for
B-3-9
soil
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
K-. value that is provided hi this table.
5.42E+00
DW plant
air
Bv value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaga.,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided in this table.
B-2-8
S.OOE-02
air
Bvtm value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, and H that is
cifecfui Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table. -
B-3-8
5.00E-02
A-3-112
-------
TABLE.A-3-17
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BENZALDEHYDE (100-52-7)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamttk (day/kg FW)
fiaj^(day/kgFW)
Bapark (day/kg FW)
Baegg (day/kg FW)
^flcteto, (day/kg FW)
BCFjn,
(L/kgFW tissue)
A^OAgFW)
ASW^, (unitless)
/?;D (mg/kg/day)
Oa/CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
/J/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
G/g/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
mg/kg/day)'1
£«*,<;* value was calculated by using the correlation equation with-ST^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K
value that is provided in this table.
Baix^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^,
value that is provided in this table.
Bcporf value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K value
that is provided in this table. "
BaMcken value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF&,, value calculated using the correlation equation with K
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980)— See Appendix A-3.
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Health Benchmarks
U.S. EPA (1997b)
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
2.38E-07
7.54E-07
9.12E-07
2.38E-04
5.95E-07
7.81E-KIO
NA
NA
1.01E-01
ND
3.50E-01
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-113
-------
TABLE A-3-18
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BENZENE (71-43-2)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter I Reference and Explanation
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
Ta.(cmVs)
DK(cmVs)
K,t (unitless)
/^(mL/g)
Jfc/,(cmVg)
&k(L/Kg)
JW,,(cmJ/g)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckeknan (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
H value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the Mw,S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
De value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Devalue was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean of measured values was obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Km value that is provided in
this table.
Kd... value was calculated by using the correlation equation with KOI. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kam value
was calculated by using the KM value that is provided in this table.
Kd,., value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^roc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumedorganic carbon of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by using the
Kx value that is provided in this table.
-
-
— •
~
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
Value
78.11
278.6
1.25E-01
at25°C
(liquid)
1.78E+03
5.49E-03
1.17E-01
1.02E-05
137
6.20E+01
6.20E-01
4.65E+00
2.48E+00
A-3-114
-------
TABLE A-3-18
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BENZENE (71-43-2)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
RCF
, Uglg DW plant .
^g/mL soil water
^^"root yeg
,Hglg DW plant.
Hg/g soil
Brag
,Hglg DW plant.
f-tg/g soil
Brforagf
fizgig DW plant.
pglg soil
Bvag
^glg DW plant.
/j.g/g air
Bvforage
,Vg/g DW plant.
fj.g/g air
; Reference and Explanation - *• " ' . ,'•
Etflsiiifioiis
1 ^uSltfi
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Mackav
Shiu, and Ma (1992).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the A_, value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroctve? value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in tiiis table (see section A4.3.2 of Appendix A-3).
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, that is cited in
Travis and Anns (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
Brjbrag* value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM, value that is provided in this table.
Bv# value was calculated by using the correlation equation withX^,, and ,ff that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and VigM (1992); then reducing this value by a factor oflOO,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the Hand Km values that are provided in this
table.
Bvf, rfs. value was calculated by using the correlation equation withX^, and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and VigM (1992); then reducing this value by a factor oflOO,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and K^ values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
3.89E+00
1.000000
1.66E401
2.67E+01
2.25E+00
2.25E+00
1.92E-03
1.92E-03
A-3-115
-------
TABLE A-3-18
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BENZENE (71-43-2)
(Page 3 of 3)
PftTAHtttCX*
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
5^ (day/kg FW)
Sa^ (day/kg FW)
fl
-------
TABLE A-3-19
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE (56-55-3)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
" ' * Reference and Explanation , =
Htaudiioiis
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
rm(K)
PJ>(atm)
S(mg/L)
#(atm-mVmol)
Z)a(cm2/s)
A,(cm2/s)
Km (unitless)
^(mL/g)
^4(mL/g)
ffiLffjKg)
JSUmL/g)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
AT value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database, U.S. EPA (1994d).
Devalue was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database, U.S. EPA (1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean of measured values was obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation wither that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kda
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the K0, value that is provided in
this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to srte
conditions, should be used to calculate KdM because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kdt, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumedorganic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdb, value was calculated by
using the K^ value that is provided in this table.
_
—
-
~
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
—
—
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
228.28
433
2.03E-10
at25°C
(solid)
1.28E-02
3.62E-06
2.47E-02
6.21E-06
4.77E405
2.60E+05
2.60E+03
1.95E+04
1.04E+04
A-3-117 '
-------
TABLE A-3-19
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE (56-55-3)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitiess)
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using S, Tm, and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, (tg/g DW plant .
' fig/mL soil water
Br^,^
^g/g DW plant j
ttg/g soil
Br«
.pg/g DW plant.
Uglg soil
Brj^.
,Hglg DW plant j
s ng/g soil
*W
^tglg DWplant^
Uglg air
Bvj^,
^glg DW plant ^
Uglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km, that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
BrraavK-was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided in
this tame (see section A4.3.2 of Appendix A-3).
Br value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
Brtge- value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
irrrravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km, value that is provided in this table.
Bv value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi. (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi. (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the Hand Km values that are provided in this
table.
Sv6_« value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
citedin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi. (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided in this
table.
' Equations
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
Value
3.72E-01
0.880520
5.48E+03
2.11E+00
2.02E-02
2.02E-02
1.72E+04
1.72E+04
A-3-118
-------
TABLE A-3-19
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BENZO(A)ANTHRACENE (56-55-3)
(Page 3 of 3)
' Parameter
• ' Reference and Explanation '. '. ,
Equations
Value .
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamak (day/kg FW)
Ba^rf (day/kg FW)
&V* (day/kg FW)
Baegg (day/kg FW)
^tote, (day/kg FW)
aCFjw
(L/kg FW tissue)
A^OAgFW)
BSAF^k (unitless)
Banuk value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^,
value that is provided hi this table.
Ba^g value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba k value was calculated by using thethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Babe^ value (see section A4.3.2 of Appendix A-3).
Baeg, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA ^1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
BaMckm value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A4.3.3 of Appendix A-3).
-
BAFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value above 4.0, as cited in U.S. EPA
(1995b). BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying a food chain
multiplier (FCM) with a geometric mean of various laboratory measured BCFs
obtained from.various experimental studies cited in U.S. EPA (1998). FCM& were
obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc) — See Appendix A-3.
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
3.79E-03
1.20E-02
1.45E-02
3.79E+00
9.46E-03
NA
5.10E+03
NA
Health Benchmarks
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
-R/C (mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
Gzg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
-
calculated by multiplying the Oral CSF for Benzo(a)pyrene by the relative potency
fectorforBenzo(a)anthraceneof0.1 (U.S.EPA 1993e)
-
Calculated from Oral CSF using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
Value based on Oral CSF assuming route-to-route extrapolation.
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
ND
7.31E-01
ND
2.10E-04
7.31E-01
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-119
-------
TABLE A-3-20
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BENZO(A)PYRENE (50-32-8)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
< Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
Tm(K)
Vp(&tm)
S(mg/L)
//(atm-m'/mol)
£>,,(cm2/s)
Z>w(cmVs)
K,* (unitiess)
A«(mL/g)
JW,(mL/g)
«k
-------
TABLE A-3-20
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BENZO(A)PYRENE (50-32-8)
(Page 2 of 3)
„ Parameter
Reference and Explanation ' ' ' •
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless) •
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991)
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using S, Tm, and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used hi the calculations.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2;B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
4.77E-01
0.264620
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, fj.g/g DW plant .
'//g/wZ, soil water'
Brrootveg
,Vg/g DW plant.
tig/g soil
*W
,Hglg DW plant.
Uglg soil
Brforage
,Hglg DW plant.
Uglg soil
*W
,pglg DW plant.
Vg/g air
Bvfarag,
,jj.gls DW plant.
Hg/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A^, that is cited hi
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the JSL, value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Srnotveg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
hi fliis table (see Section A3.4.2 of Appendix A-3).
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited hi
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
BfjBsagi value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and #that is
cited hi Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor oflOO.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided in this table.
Bvforag? value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); andBacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided hi tin's table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.22E+04
1.26E+00
1.11E-02
1.11E-02
2.25E405
2.25E+05
A-3-121
-------
TABLE A-3-20
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BENZO(A)PYRENE (50-32-8)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Ba*» (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^t (day/kg FW)
Jfc^day/kgFW)
Bo.w^ (day/kg FW)
BCFjw,
(L/kg, FW tissue)
fcUfcCL/kgFW)
BSAFju, (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamm value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited hi
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided hi this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited hi
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided hi this table.
Bflport value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A3 .4.2 in Appendix A-3).
Ba,,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
BoMda, value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A3 .4.3 hi Appendix A-3).
-
BAFs were used for compounds with a log Km value above 4.0, as cited hi U.S. EPA
(1995b). BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying a food chain
multiplier (FCM) with a geometric mean of various laboratory measured BCFs
obtained from various experimental studies cited hi U.S. EPA (1998). FCMs were
obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc) — See Appendix A-3.
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Value
1.07E-02
3.38E-02
4.10E-02
1.07E+01
2.67E-02
NA
9.95E+03
NA
Health Benchmarks
%fD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
/yt?(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
fag/hi3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(rng/kg/day)"1
-
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
Calculated from Oral CSF using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
Value based on Oral CSF assuming route-to-route extrapolation.
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
ND
7.30E400
ND
2.10E-03
7.30E+00
Note:
NA « Not applicable
ND «• No data available
All parameters are defined hi list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-122
-------
TABLE A-3-21
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE (205-99-2)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter. , \
MT(g/mole)
r.(K)
Vp(a.tni)
S(mg/L)
#(atm-m3/mol)
A,(cm2/s)
A,(cm2/s)
X^, (unitless)
^(mL/g)
*4(mL/g)
^(L/Kg)
AtffeOnL/g)
* ' ' " '- '** * *> Reference andl Explanation <' ' > • >,- |" Eouations =>
Chemical/Physical Properties
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1 994c)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, SandVp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database U.S. EPA (1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database U.S. EPA (1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation withX™ for phthalates
and PAHs, cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). Kac value was calculated by using the
recommended K^ value that is provided in this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with KK that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 m soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the AL. value that is provided in
this table.
Kdg, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to sue
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdm because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kd& value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kx that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdb, value was calculated by
using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
_
..
-
—
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
—
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
'Value *
252.32
441
1.06E-10
at25°C
(solid)
4.33E-03
6.18E-06
2.28E-02
5.49E-06
1.59E+06
8.36E+05
8.36E+03
6.27E-H)4
3.34E404
A-3-123
-------
TABLE A-3-21
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE (205-99-2)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
kg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and MHchalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value ofFv was calculated by using S, Tm and Vp values
mat are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
4.15E-01
0.821980
Biorransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, ng/g DW plant ,
*f*g/mL soil water
,Hg/g DW plant.
ftg/g soil
,Hglg DW plant.
(l*g/g DW plant.
(jtglg soil
.Uglg DW plant ^
pg/g air
,ygtg DW plant ^
pgtg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
if value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in mis table.
fir., value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Brjfeeg, value was calculated by using the correlation equation vn&iKm that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
.By., value was calculated by using the correlation equation v/iihKm, and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
BVfyn- value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and //that is
citedin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in mis table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.39E-KW
1.66E+00
1.007E-02
1.007E-02
3.65E+04
3.65E+04
A-3-124
-------
TABLE A-3-21
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BENZO(B)FLUORANTHENE (205-99-2)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter / •
Bamttk (day/kg FW)
£aw(day/kgFW)
5
-------
TABLE A-3-22
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE (207-08-9)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation ,
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties
MFFfe/mole)
7"«(K)
J>(atm)
S(mg/L)
/ar(atnvmVmol)
£>. (cmVs)
£>w(cmVs)
Kgf (unitless)
J^.(mL/g)
&/,(mL/g)
tt^OVKg)
J&/,,(inL/g)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
U.S. EPA (1994b)
U.S.EPA(1994b)
/lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S and Vp values that are provided in this table.
£>„ value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database U.S. EPA (1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database U.S. EPA (1994d).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995)
K.., value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ for phthalates
and PAHs, cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). K^ value was calculated by using the
recommended K^ value that is provided m this table.
Kd. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0f that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kda
because the value vanes, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd-, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koq that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kam value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kd,., value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kac that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment Measured organic carbon m bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by
using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
-
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
—
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
Value
252.32
490
1.32E-12
at25°C
(solid)
8.0E-04
4.15E-07
2.28E-02
5.49E-06
1.56E+06
8.32E-05
8.32E+03
6.24E+04
3.33E+04
A-3-126
-------
TABLE A-3-22
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE (207-08-9)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
ksg(year)-]
Fv (unitless)
RCF
, (tg/g DW plant .
' ' uglmL soil -water
Bfrooneg
,Hglg DW plant.
IJ-glg soil
Bras
,pglg DW plant.
Vglg soil
Brfora&
,/j.g/g DW plant.
Uglg soil
Svag
,Hglg DW plant.
Vg/g air
Bvforage
^glg DWplant^
pglg air
Reference and Explanation ^ *
Eiiiiiations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Ksgvdus was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Lyman
Reehl, and Rosenblatt (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value ofFv was calculated by using S, Tm and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Brrooc,eg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in uiis table.
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table. :
Brf,,aee value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using Hie correlation equation with-K^, and #that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM values that are provided hi this table.
Bvfoys, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and VigM (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
B-l-2;B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.18E-01
0.148943
1.38E+04
1.66E+00
1.01E-02
1.01E-02
5.40E+05
5.40E+05
A-3-127
-------
TABLE A-3-22
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BENZO(K)FLUORANTHENE (207-08-9)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation • -•• :.'x.: ''"-;-/::;!.:.':-'K''il ".C
: ''AEiiHiitionsV i4w ^sviiuiv: Y
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamiat (day/kg FW)
Ba^f (day/kg FW)
Bo,,,* (day/kg FW)
Bam (day/kg FW)
jBodutta, (day/kg FW)
jBCFkL
(L/kgFW tissue)
2?^(L/kgFW)
BSAFju, (unitless)
RJD (mg/kg/day)
Ofl/CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
4/C (mgAn3)
Inhalation URF
Cig/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
fia^at value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Bflfcw- value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
.BaLori value was calculated by using thethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
anomultiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Ba... value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
CahTornia EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
B<*
-------
TABLE A-3-23
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BENZOIC ACID (65-85-0)
(Page 1 of 4)
' Parameter
s-' , s- Reference and Explanation ' "",''
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
AflF(g/mole)
rm(K)
rp(atm)
S(mg/L)
/f(atm-m3/mol)
£>0(cm2/s)
D»(cm2/s)
Km (unitless)
^(mL/g)
J&Ucm'/g)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1992a).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
//value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
For all ionizing organics, Koc values were estimated on the basis of pH. Estimated
values were obtained from U.S. EPA (1994c).
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 m soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kda
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
-
—
-
--
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
122.12
395.5
8.57E-06
at25°C
(solid)
3.15E403
3.22E-07
5.36E-02
8.80E-06
7.60E401
_-TT rr
EQ £oc
1 3L9I
2 31.80
3 30.13
4 19.81
5 4.81
6 0.99
7 0.55
8 0.50
9 0.50
10 0.50
11 0.50
12 0.50
13 0.50
14 0.50
5.50E-03
A-3-129
-------
TABLE A-3-23
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BENZOIC ACID (65-85-0)
(Page 2 of 4)
!>•«•* *n»i»»*
Reference and Explanation
Equations I Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^. that is cited in
U.§!!EPA (1993d) for anassumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 m suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate jEdL, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Ka^, value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
4.13E-02
(cmVg)
Kd,,. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with KK that is cited in
U.s! EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by
using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
B-4-16; B-4-25
2.20E-02
ksg (year)'1
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited Howard
(1989-1993).
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
1.26E+02
Fv (unltless)
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that
are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
0.999992
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
DW plant
'ng/mL soil -water
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
B-2-10
1.28E+01
Br,
DW plant
5r value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in unstable.
B-2-10
soil
2.33E+03
soil
Br value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K-, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
B-2-9
3.17E+00
(ltg/g DW plant.
(ig/g SOil
Br^,,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM, value that is provided in this table.
B-3-9
3.17E+00
Bvm
(•
figlg DW plant ^
air
Bv value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,_
^™»1-___—11 _ ^1_l__.«.u «..J YT'I^wti* /1OOT\. +l%ar* *>aAfif*i++fv +VllO T/olllI
_ l_ OUU. y IK*'* VJ"'''V/> CU.AV* A^WW^ij •WWiWJ**i*fc*j *J**OO^>
Chemello, Calamari, and VigB (1992); then reduchig this value by a factor oflOO.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
B-2-8
1.69E+01
A-3-130
-------
TABLE A-3-23
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BENZOIC ACID (65-85-0)
(Page 3 of 4)
' ' Parameter .'
> ''' Reference and Explanation •• '
N Equations '
Biotransfer Factors for Plants (Continued)
Svf<,rage
fUglg DW plant^
V / . )
Uglg air
EaMk (day/kg FW)
5aw(day/kgFW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
flaeaf (day/kg FW)
•Badwato, (day/kg FW)
BCFja
(L/kgFW tissue)
A4F^ (L/kg FW)
5£1F^ (unitless)
Bvf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); andBacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and VigM (1992); then reducing this value by a fector oflOO.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and K^ values that are provided in this table.
B-3-8
V0in6 ^
1.69E+01
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamttk value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ba,^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, that is cited hr
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^,. value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/1 9) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Baeg. value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA^, that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
BdcMcka, value was calculated by using the fet content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Babe^f value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation with Km
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
6.04E-07
1.91E-06
2.31E-06
6.04E-04
1.51E-06
1.58E+01
MA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RJD (mg/kg/day)
Oa/ CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
^(mg/m3)
U.S.EPA (1997b)
~
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
4.00E+00
ND
1.40E+01
A-3-131
-------
TABLE A-3-23
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FORBENZOIC ACID (65-85-0)
(Page 4 of 4)
Inhalation URF
(^gAn5)-1
Inhalation CSF
Reference and Explanation
Health Benchmarks (continued)
-
-
, Equations
C-2-1
C-2-2
Value
ND
ND
Note:
NA» Not applicable
ND «• No data available
All parameters arc defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-132
-------
TABLE A-3-24
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BENZONITRILE (100-47-0)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
. • > '" Reference and Explanation *
Equations
. Vatee
Chemical/Physical Properties
AffF(g/mole)
rm(K)
Vp(a\m)
S(mgfL)
fl^atm-rnVmol)
Da(cm2/s)
Dw(cm2/s)
K^ (Unitless)
A^(mL/g)
M(cm3/g)
tf4*(L/Kg)
/sT4s(cm3/g)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
-
-
—
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1 994d).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995).
]£„ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for
phthalates and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs,
dioxins, and furans, cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). K^. value was calculated by
using the recommended Km value that is provided in this table.
Kds value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A^ that is cited
hi U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil.
Measured organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to
calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic
carbon in soil. Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Koc value
that is provided hi this table.
.KsL, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0, that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 hi
suspended sediment. Measured organic carbon hi suspended sediment, specific
to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies,
depending on the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment.
Recommended Kd^, value was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided
hi this table.
Kdhs value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
hi U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 hi bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending
on the fraction of organic carbon hi bottom sediment. Recommended .Ka^ value
was calculated by using the Kac value that is provided in this table.
-
-
-
~
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8;B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
—
B-l-3;B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-3-3; B-3-4;
B-3-5; B-3-6;
B-4-3; B-4-4;
B-4-5; B-4-6;
B-4-10;B-4-ll
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
103.12
285.85
ND
ND
ND
7.45E-02
9.43E-06
3.63E+01
2.33E+02
2.33E+00
1.75E+01
9.33E+00
A-3-133
-------
TABLE A-3-24
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BENZONITRILE (100-47-0)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
ksg (year)*1
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation >*'. :'.^-^ > •^••'^•"fA
V:mauaii6^-St;^Vataaa
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Ksg value was assumed to be 0 due to a lack of data.
Fv value was assumed to be 1.0 due to a lack of data.
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-l;B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
0.0
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
f ng/g DW plant ,
v UglmL soil \vater'
Brnol
tfiglg DW plant »
l*g/g soil
tfiglg DW plant \
Uglg soil
(Hg/g DW plant*
Uglg soil
,ygtg DWplant^
Uglg air
^glg DW plant.
Uglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight
basis by using a moisture content of 87 percent.
Brraolvfg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value
provided in this table.
Br „ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
Br, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
cifed in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the KM, value that is provided in this table.
™""
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
l.OOE+01
4.29E+00
4.86E+00
4.86E+00
ND
ND
A-3-134
-------
TABLE A-3-24
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BENZONITRILE (100-47-0)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter ,
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamm (day/kg FW)
Sa^day/kgFW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
5aejK (day/kg FW)
tfeUfcto, (day/kg FW)
«CF^
(L/kg FW tissue)
JMFjMCLfegFW)
BSAF^ (unitless)
Ua^a. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A^ that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using
the KM, value that is provided in this table.
BOM value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using
the KM value that is provided in this table.
Ba k value was calculated by using the fet content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba,^ value.
Ba,,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^,
value that is provided in this table.
Bctcudm value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef
(15/19) and multiplying it with the Ba^tf value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation with
Km obtained from VeitK, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix
A-3.
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
2.88E-07
9.12E-07
1.10E-06
2.88E-04
7.20E-07
9.03E+00
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
fljD (mg/kg/day)
Ora/ CfiF (mg/kg/day)'1
/^(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF (Mg/m3)'1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
-
.-
-
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined hi list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-135
-------
TABLE A-3-25
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BENZYL ALCOHOL (100-51-6)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
rM(K)
*5?(atm)
S(mg/L)
.//(atnvmVmol)
Z>.(cmVs)
A,(anVs)
J^Omltless)
K^OnL/g)
tf4(cmVg)
Kd»QJKg)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1992a).
//value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
£>„ value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Devalue was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Km value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for phthalates
and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans,
cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). K^. value was calculated by using the recommended K^
value that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kof that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kdn
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon hi soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd.,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koq that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon hi suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^, value
was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in this table.
--
-
-
--
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
•m&a*B
108.13
288.29
1.40E-04
at25°C
(solid)
4.00E404
3.78E-07
6.89E-02
9.38E-06
1.26E401
1.02E+01
1.02E-01
7.66E-01
A-3-136
-------
TABLE A-3-25
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BENZYL ALCOHOL (100-51-6)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter s
Reference and Exnlanatinn
Fttliottnne
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Kdg value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdis, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by
using the K^ value mat is provided in this table.
B-4-16; B-4-25
4.09E-01
ksg (year)'1
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
0.0
Fv (unitless)
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that
are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was convertedto a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
0.999996
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
DW plant
soil water'
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using die Km value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
B-2-10
7.94E+00
Br.
rootveg
,/tg/g DW plant.
in this table.
value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
B-2-10
7.77E+01
f DW plant,
fig/g soil
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K-., value that
1C rw/vt/J/larl J*t +lt«n +nl*1A
B-2-9
is provided in this table.
8.95E+00
Br,
forage
,. DW plant \
Uglg soil
Brfaap yah>e was calculated by using the correlation equation withA^, that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM, value that is provided in this table.
B-3-9
8.95E+00
DW plant,
air
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and VigH (1992); then reducing this value by a fector oflOO.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in tins table.
B-2-8
2.19E+00
Bv,
. DW plant.
air
B-3-8
v»wu»*ft*v, ^Mmiimn, cuiu T Ijgll* \L774iJ) LUC11 IGUUl/llig UI1S VOlUC OV A laWlUF OI
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
2.19E-HH)
A-3-137
-------
TABLE A-3-25
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BENZYL ALCOHOL (100-51-6)
(Page 3 of 3)
PftTftni Cltl"
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
BamUt (day/kg FW)
fiaw(day/kgFW)
Ba^dtoy/kgFW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
^Ufcte, (day/kg FW)
BCF.,*
(L/kg FW tissue)
Atf^OAgFW)
BSAFfj, (unitless)
Ba^at value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
^abaf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba,^,. value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Ba value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
•B«rf*to. value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba,^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^, value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCFm value calculated using the correlation equation with Km
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
—
—
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Health Benchmarks
ItfD (mg/kg/day)
OralCSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
/y£7(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)"
Inhalation CSF
(mE/kc/dsy)
U.S.EPA(1997b)
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
C-l-8
C-l-7
.C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
•Vx^aJUtev;":"
l.OOE-07
3.16E-07
3.83E-07
l.OOE-04
2.5E-07
4.04E+00
NA
NA
3.00E-01
ND
1.10
ND
ND
Note:
NA - Not applicable
ND «* No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-138
-------
TABLE A-3-26
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BENZYL CHLORIDE (100-44-7)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MT(g/mole)
r«(K)
Vp (atm)
S(mg/L)
^(atm-mVmol)
A,(cm2/s)
.Dw(cm2/s)
X^, (unitless)
^(mL/g)
^(cm3/g)
m^ff/Kg)
JSSUcmVg)
' Reference and Explanation ,
* JSuu&ffoiis'
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman( 1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Arithmetic mean value cited hi Karickhoff and Long (1 995).
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and fiarans, cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). Km value was calculated by using the recommended AL, value
that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 hi soil. Measured
organic carbon hi soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate £#„
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the K., value that is provided in
this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation wither that is cited hi
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon m suspended sediment, specific to sue
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kdts value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 hi bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdh, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon hi bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Koc value that is provided hi this table.
—
—
-
—
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
—
—
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
126.58
225.1
1.60E-03
at25°C
(liquid)
4.90E+02
4.13E-04
5.43E-02
8.80E-06
2.30E+00
2.71E400
2.71E-02
2.03E-01
1.08E-01
A-3-139
-------
TABLE A-3-26
CHEMICAL-SPECBFIC INPUTS FOR BENZYL CHLORIDE (100-44-7)
(Page 2 of 3)
p l__
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)"1
JMimitless)
RCF
, uglg DW plant ,
* figlmL soil water'
,Hglg DW plant \
Uglg soil
tftgfg DW plant \
Uglg soil
.Uglg DW plant ^
Uglg soil
.Uglg DWplant^
ftg/g air
.Uglg DW plant ^
ftgtg air
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life hi soil, as cited in Howard,
. Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited hi Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B^4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA^, that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Aj™ value that is
provided hi this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
jB/V-oj™ value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table.
fir., value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Br&r&ts value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
]£„, value that is provided in this table.
Sv™ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Kg* values that are provided hi this table.
JJvfc-,.., value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, and /f that is
citedin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, andVighi (1990); andBacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
2.09E-H)!
1.000000
6.75E+00
2.49E+02
2.39E+01
2.39E+01
3.28E-04
3.28E-04
A-3-140
-------
TABLE A-3-26
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BENZYL CHLORIDE (100-44-7)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Bamak (day/kg FW)
a^«M»)
Bapork (day/kg FW)
.Ba^ (day/kg FW)
£a*tete» (day/kg FW)
(L/kfFW tissue)
AiFjuCL/kgFW)
BSAFf,h (unitless)
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
*/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
Reference and Explanation
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamilk value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K
value that is provided in this table.
Ba,^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K-,
value that is provided in this table.
Ba,*,* value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Ba «K value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the AL, value
that is provided in this table.
Bachicb* value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Babe^f value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation with AT
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980)— See Appendix A-3.
-
-
Health Benchmarks
-
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
Calculated from Oral CSF using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg. }
Value based on Oral CSF assuming route-to-route extrapolation.
lunations
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
Vatae
1.83E-08
5.78E-08
6.99E-08
1.83E-05
4.56E-08
1.11E+00
NA
NA
ND
1.70E-01
ND
4.90E-05
1.70E-01
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-141
-------
TABLE A-3-27
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BERYLLIUM (7440-41-7)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
r*CK)
*3?(atm)
5(mg/L)
J-r(atm-mVmol)
£).(cmVs)
£>w(cmVs)
]£„ (unitless)
^(mL/g)
*y,(mL/g)
K„ value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
—
—
Kd, value was obtained from U.S. EPA (1996a), which provides pH-based
values that were estimated by using the MINTEQ2 geochemical speciation
model.
Kdm value is assumed to be same as the Kd, value, because organic carbon does
not play a major role in sorption for the metals, as cited in U.S. EPA (1994f).
Kid), value is assumed to be same as the Kd, value, because organic carbon does
not play a major role in sorption for the metals, as cited in U.S. EPA (1994f).
-
-
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18;
B-4-24
B-4-16;
B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
Value
9.01
1,560
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.39E-01
5.08E-05
NA
NA
23atpH=4.9;
790atpH=6.8;
l.OE+05 at
pH=8.0
23atpH=4.9;
790atpH=6.8;
l.OE+05 at
pH=8.0
23atpH=4.9;
790atpH=6.8;
l.OE+05 at
pH=8.0
ND
A-3-142
-------
TABLE A-3-27
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BERYLLIUM (7440-41-7)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Fv (unitless)
. ' "' ' Reference and Explanation '
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Because they are nonvolatile, metals are assumed to be 100 percent in
paniculate phase and zero percent in the vapor phase, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994f).
Equations
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
> -. Value •" *
0.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
. ng/g DW plant -
" ftg/mL soil water
Brrootng
,IJ.glg DW plant .
Uglg soil
Brag
,Hglg DW plant .
pglg soil
Bfforage
^glg DW plant.
Uglg soil
Brgrafo
,Vglg DW plant.
f^g/g soil
Bvag
,&glg DW plant.
/tg/g air
BVji,rage
,fj.glg DW plant.
IMglg air
Brmaneg value was obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984). Br
values for nonvegetative growth (such as tubers) in Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and
Shor (1984) were used for Brrooneg.
Brag value for fruits was obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984).
Br values for nonvegetative growth (reproductive) in Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and
Shor (1984) were used for Br^ (fruits). Br^ value for vegetables was calculated
using data obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984). Br values for
nonvegetative (reproductive) growth and Bv values for vegetative growth
weighted as 75% (reproductive) and 25% vegetative (Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and
Shor [1984]) — were used for Br^ (vegetables).
The weighted average Brag value for aboveground produce was obtained as
follows: (1) Br values for fruits combined with a human consumption rate of
fruits of 1.44E-03 kg/kg/day, and (2) Br values for vegetables combined with a
human consumption rate of vegetables of 1.49E-03 kg/kg/day.
Brf,r<,g, value was obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984). Bv
values for vegetative growth (such as leaves and stems) in Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen,
and Shor (1984) were used for Brforage.
Brpam value was obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984). Br
values for nonvegetative growth as recommended by Baes, Sharp. Sjoreen, and
Shor (1984) were used for Br^.
Metals are assumed to not experience air-to-leaf transfer, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b).
Metals are assumed to not experience air-to-leaf transfer, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b).
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-8
B-3-8
B-2-8
B-3-8
ND
1.50E-03
2.58E-03
l.OOE-02
1.50E-03
NA
NA
A-3-143
-------
TABLE A-3-27
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BERYLLIUM (7440-41-7)
(Page 3 of 3)
Pwjiincttx"
BaM (day/kg FW)
tfo^day/kg FW)
Ba^t (day/kg FW)
Bam (day/kg FW)
Bo^Afcte, (day/kg FW)
(L/kg FW tissue)
B,4FM(L/kgFW)
BSAFfi,h (unitless)
/yD (mg/kg/day)
Oa/CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
^(mg/m1)
Inhalation URF
(A*g/m3)-'
Inhalation CSF
fmfi/k^dayV'
Reference and Explanation
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^it values were obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984) for all
metals, except cadmium, mercury, selenium, and zinc.
Bai^f values were obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984) for all
metals, except cadmium, mercury, selenium, and zinc.
—
—
—
Geometric mean value obtained from various literature sources (see Appendix
A3.4).
—
—
Health Benchmarks
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997c)
Equations
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
^•'•H'^vWuev:^:'"'
9.0E-07
l.OE-03
ND
ND
ND
4.20E+01
NA
NA
2.00E-03
4.3E+00
2.0E-02
2.4E-03
8.4E400
Note:
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-144
-------
TABLE A-3-28
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ALPHA-BHC (319-84-6)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
r«(R)
Vp(atin)
S(mg/L)
//"(atnvnrYmol)
A,(cm2/s)
Z>w(cm2/s)
A^,, (unitless)
^(mL/g)
AiJUcmVg)
^(L/Kg)
*4,(cm3/g)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (19?4c).
H value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994g).
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kof that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate &?„
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd,,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with KOI. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kd,,s value was calculated by using the correlation equation with ATOI, that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
-
-
~
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
--
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
290.0
432.2
5.61E-08
at25°C
(solid)
2.40E+00
6.78E-06
0.0191
5.04E-06
6.30E+03
1.76E+03
1.76E+01
1.32E+02
7.05E+01
A-3-145
-------
TABLE A-3-28
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ALPHA-BHC (319-84-6)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations ,
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life hi soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that
are provided hi this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a liquid
phase value before being used hi the calculations.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-l;B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
1.87E+00
0.999500
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, uglg DW plant .
* fig/mL soil water'
tUglg DW plant.
pg/g soil
.Uglg DW plant.
Uglg soil
^glg DW plant j
Hg/g soil
,Hg/g DW plant.
pglg air
BV^lgDW plant
Uglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the KM value that is
provided hi this table. The value was hen converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Br^efxg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
hi this table.
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided hi this table.
Br&t°& value Vfas calculated by using the correlation equation withA^, that is cited
hiTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided hi this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and /f that is
cited hi Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided in this table.
Bvfi-gp value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K-, and #that is
citedin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KW values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
2.02E+02
1.15E+01
2.47E-01
2.47E-01
9.17E401
9.17E+01
A-3-146
-------
TABLE A-3-28
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ALPHA-BHC (319-84-6)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Ba^a, (day/kg FW)
Ea^ (day/kg FW)
Afcrt (day/kg FW)
tfa^ (day/kg FW)
-B«cwcto, (day/kg FW)
(L/kf FW tissue)
AlFjuOAgFW)
.RS^fc,, (unitless)
° : • • '. Reference and Explanation
£jQti£t^ioii$
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamilk value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K
value that is provided in this table.
Bateg value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Bapork value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba,^ value.
Ba value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K-. value
that is provided in this table.
^chicken value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCFM value calculated using the correlation equation with A:
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980)(see Appendix A-3).
-
- - .
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Health Benchmarks
/?#> (mg/kg/day)
Oa/ CSF
(mg/kg/dayy1
/?/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
Cug/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
-
U.S.EPA (1997b)
-
U.S.EPA (1997b)
U.S.EPA(1997c)
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
5.00E-05
1.58E-04
1.92E-04
5.00E-02
1.25E-04
4.54E+02
NA
NA
ND
6.30E+00
ND
1.80E-03
6.3E+00
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-147
-------
TABLE A-3-29
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BETA-BHC (319-85-7)
(Page 1 of 3)
P&rftro ctcx*
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
Tn(K)
Fp(atin)
5(mg/L)
/f(atm-m3/mol)
D.tcmVs)
Dw(ctnVs)
#„, (uniUess)
^(mL/g)
#4(cmVg)
J&COUKg)
J&4,(cmVg)
Montgomeiy and Welkom (1991)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
//value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
De value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dv value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994g).
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd,,
because the value vanes, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in
this table.
Kd.. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koq that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
AiaL value was calculated by using the correlation equation withAT^ that is cited hi
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
-
--
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
• '-VataevS-
290.83
582.1
6.45E-10
at25°C
(solid)
5.42E-01
3.46E-07
1.9E-02
5.40E-06
6.81E+03
2.14E+03
2.14E+01
1.60E+02
8.56E+01
A-3-148
-------
TABLE A-3-29
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BETA-BHC (319-85-7)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
fog (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
RCF
' V-glg DW plant -
* IMg/mL soil water
,fj.g/g DW plant,
Uglg soil
,Hglg DW plant,
Uglg soil
Brforag,
,Hglg DW plant.
Hg/g soil
Bvag
,yg/g DW plant,
t^glg air
BV*7glgDW plant.
( / . )
fj,g/g air
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that
are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a liquid
phase value before being used in the calculations.
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Brro<,peg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in mis table.
Braves value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
Br^age value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vigtu (1992); then reducing this value by a factor oflOO.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided hi mis table.
Bvf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited MI Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KW values that are provided in mis table.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
2.04E400
0.998571
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
2.14E+02
l.OOE+01
2.36E-01
2.36E-01
1.95E+03
1.95E+03
A-3-149
-------
TABLE A-3-29
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BETA-BHC (319-85-7)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
. . ' . * -
Reference and Explanation
Equations
;.::^Vahie«?
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
-Bo^t (day/kg FW)
£0^ (day/kg FW)
Sa^fcta (day/kg FW)
SCF,,.
(L/kg FW tissue)
BAF^QJkgFW)
BSAFf,H (unitless)
Bam!lt value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^. that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value mat is provided in this table.
Ba,^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation vnHhKm that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Bapwk value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Ba,g. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
mat is provided in this table.
BaoHicia, value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^, value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF values were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995b).
BCFfu, value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
—
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
5.41E-05
1.71E-04
2.07E-04
5.41E-02
1.35E-04
4.82E-K)2
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
PJD (mg/kg/day)
OralCSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
R/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
Gug/taJ)-'
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
-
U.S.EPA(1997c)
-
U.S.EPA(1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997c)
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
ND
1.80E+00
ND
1.80E-03
1.8E+00
Note:
NA * Not applicable
ND " No data available
AH parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-150
-------
TABLE A-3-30
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BIS(2-CHLORETHYL)ETHER (111-44-4)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
* Reference and Explanation
Equations '
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MT(g/mole)
rm(K)
Vp(atm)
5(mg/L)
//(atm-m'/mol)
A,(cm2/s)
Z>w(cm2/s)
Km (unitless)
^(mL/g)
^(cmVg)
AaLOJKg)
JC4 (cm3/g)
ksg (year)'1
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
//value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kdj,s value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by
using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
-
-
~
--
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
143.02
223.1
1.76E-03
at25°C
(liquid)
1.18E+04
2.13E-05
4.40E-02
8.70E-06
2.00E+01
7.60E+01
7.60E-01
5.70E+00
3.04E+00
1.41E+00
A-3-151
-------
TABLE A-3-30
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BIS(2-CHLORETHYL)ETHER (111-44-4)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter | Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
/=V(unitless)
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value ofFv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
. pg/g DW plant ,
1 ngfmL soil water'
t{*g/g DW plant •>
pglg soil
ft*g/8 DW plant*.
fig/g soil
,Hglg DW plant \
/jg/g soil
,Hglg DW plant.
Hg/g air
.pglg DW plant \
ftg/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982V Recommended value was calculated by using the K-, value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
•^TOHW* value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table.
Br^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Brjfepp value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
Bv^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and VigM (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KO, values that are provided in this table.
Bvf*tst value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and /fthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KO, values that are provided in tins table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
8.64E+00
1.14E+01
6.85E+00
6.85E+00
6.37E-02
6.37E-02
A-3-152
-------
TABLE A-3-30
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BIS(2-CHLORETHYL)ETHER (111-44-4)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
^(day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
5aear (day/kg FW)
A^u. (day/kg FW)
JCFjM
(L/kg FW tissue)
&4F^(L/kgFW)
BSAFfrf, (unitless)
fl/D (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
.R/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
Gug/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Valwell
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamak value was calculated by using the correlation equation with-K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using (he K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with AT^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the fia^ value.
Sa™ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with KM that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided m this table.
BacMAm v^ue was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba,^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^a, value calculated using the correlation equation with Km
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
-
-
Health Benchmarks
-
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
U.S. EPA (1997e)
U.S.EPA(1997c)
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
1.59E-07
5.02E-07
6.08E-07
1.59E-04
3.97E-07
5.74E+00
NA
NA
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
ND
1.1E-H)0
ND
3.3E-04
1.1E+00
Note:
NA= Not applicable
ND= No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-153
-------
TABLE A-3-31
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BROMODICHLOROMETHANE (75-27-4)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
W(g/molG)
rm(K)
Vp(atin)
S(mg/L)
//(atm-mVmol)
D.(cmVs)
A,(cm2/s)
A^,(unitless)
A«(mL/g)
Ai/XcmVg)
^(L/Kg)
Aik(cmVg)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
# value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the Mff, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
KM value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). K,,. value was calculated by using the recommended Km value
that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kof that is cited hi
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate/^,
because the value vanes, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with AT0? that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
KcL, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kdb!, because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by using the
KK value that is provided in this table.
~
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
«.
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
163.83
218.1
7.68E-02
at25°C
(liquid)
3.97E+03
3.17E-03
2.98E-02
1.06E-05
1.06E+02
5.38E+01
5.38E-01
4.03E+00
2.15E+00
A-3-154
-------
TABLE A-3-31
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BROMODICHLOROMETHANE (75-27-4)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation ' * ~ j Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Ksg value was assumed to be 0 due to a lack of data.
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
0.0
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, ng/g DW plant -
^ H,glmL soil \vater'
Srr<*,tT,,g
,Hglg DW plant \
Mg/g soil
Bras
,(tg/g DW plant ^
fj,glg soil
Bfav
,l*glg DW plant ,
pglg soil
Bvag
^glg DWplant^
(tg/g air
Bvforag,
,/tg/g DW plant.
Uglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroolveg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kdt value provided
in this table (see section A3.4.2 of Appendix A-3).
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K-., value that
is provided in this table.
Br&age value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A^, that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and .ff that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Qaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Qaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor oflOO,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the /f and K^ values that are provided in this
table.
Bvf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor oflOO,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.47E+01
2.74E+01
2.61E+00
2.61E+00
2.53E-03
2.53E-03
A-3-155
-------
TABLE A-3-31
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BROMODICHLOROMETHANE (75-27-4
(Page 3 of 3)
3?Mr40ictci*
Reference and Explanation
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
fla,^ (day/kg FW)
Baw(day/kgFW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^uii*, (day/kg FW)
BCFju,
(L/kg,FW tissue)
Mfyrt(L/kgFW)
B&tf^ (unitless)
.Ba^m. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with-K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba,..^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using thethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
andmultiplying it with the Babe^ value (see section A3.4.2 of Appendix A-3).
jBa._ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
Ba-Hcta, value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
andmultiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A3.4.3 of Appendix A-3).
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCFm value calculated using the correlation equation with K^
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
—
—
Equations
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Health Benchmarks
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Ora/CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
jyC(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
0*gAn3)-'
Inhalation CSF
(tns/kc/dayY
U.S.EPA(1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997b)
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
Calculated from Oral CSF using an inhalation rate of 20 m'/day and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
Value based on Oral CSF assuming route-to-route extrapolation.
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
Value
8.42E-07
2.66E-06
3.22E-06
8.42E-04
2.10E-06
2.04E+01
NA
NA
2.00E-02
&20E-02
7.00E-02
1.80E-05
6.20E-02
Note:
NA- Not applicable
ND - No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-156
-------
TABLE A-3-32
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BROMOFORM (75-25-2)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter"
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value ,
Chemical/Physical Properties
MT(g/mole)
r,w value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kda
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Kac value that is provided in
this table.
Kdg, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0, that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kdt, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon ofO.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kdbl, because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdb! value was calculated by using the
Koc value that is provided in this table.
-
-
-
~
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
~
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
252.77
280.6
7.82E-03
at25°C
(liquid)
3.21E+03
6.16E-04
1.41E-02
1.03E-05
2.24E+02
1.26E+02
1.26E-H)0
9.45E+00
5.04E+00
A-3-157
-------
TABLE A-3-32
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BROMOFORM (75-25-2)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Equations ^
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided hi this table.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, f^g/g DW plant .
" ngtmL soil water'
,Hgfg DW plant ^
Uglg soil
,/jg/g DW plant,
l*g/g soil
,Vg/g DW plant.
t*g/g soil
>Hg/g DW plant.
fig/g air
^tglg DWplant^
pglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
.Br™,™ value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this fable (see section A3.4.2 of Appendix A-3).
Br^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Brfora- value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KW, value that is provided in this table.
5v_- value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and /fthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992) men reducing this value by a factor oflOO,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided in this
table.
Bv**fsf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and tf that is
cited ui Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, andVighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992) then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
S:^tae®
1.41E400
1.000000
2.13E+01
1.69E+01
1.70E+00
1.70E+00
2.89E-02
2.89E-02
A-3-158
-------
TABLE A-3-32
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BROMOFORM (75-25-2)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
. Reference and Explanation >-
* Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamilk (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
5flefflf (day/kg FW)
jBa.teto, (day/kg FW)
aCF*
(L/kg FW tissue)
BAFtfiQJkgVVi)
BSAFjkk (unitless)
J3am/ft value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Bataf value was calculated by using the correlation equation vn&.K that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
£
-------
TABLE A-3-33
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 4-BROMOPHENYL-PHENYLETHER (101-55-3)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MF(g/mole)
r«(K>
^(atm)
S(mg/L)
#(atnvmVmol)
£>.(cmVs)
A,(ctnVs)
^(unitless)
^(mL/g)
Kd4(ac?/g)
Kd»QJKs)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Vp value cited in Montgomery and Welkom (1991).
-
—
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dv value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995).
KK value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for
phthalates and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs,
dioxins, and furans, cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). Kog value was calculated by
using the recommended Km value that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil.
Measured organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to
calculate Kd» because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic
carbon in soil. Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the K^. value
that is provided in this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in
suspended sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific
to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies,
depending on the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment.
Recommended Kdm value was calculated by using the Kx value that is provided
in this table.
-
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
"
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-3-3; B-3-4;
B-3-5; B-3-6;
B-4-3; B-4-4;
B-4-5; B-4-6;
B-4-10;B-4-ll
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
249.2
291.8
1.97E-06
at25°C
(liquid)
ND
ND
1.98E-02
6.83E-06
1.10E405
1.21E+05
1.21E+03
9.09E403
A-3-160
-------
TABLE A-3-33
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 4-BROMOPHENYL-PHENYLETHER (101-55-3)
(Page 2 of 3)
'Parameter-
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
JD4,(anVg)
^(year)"
Fv (unitless)
Kelt, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending
on the fraction of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Ksg value was assumed to be 0 due to a lack of data.
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-1; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
, Vatoe
4.85E+03
0.0
0.999699
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, /J-g/g DW plant .
^ UglmL soil water'
,/zg/g DW plant.
pg/g soil
,IJ.glg DW plant.
Uglg soil
Bf'Zllg DW plant.
pg/g soil
.figlg DW plant.
pglg air
,t*g/g DW plant.
/£g/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight
basis by using a moisture content of 87 percent.
Br^w value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value
provided in this table.
Br value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
Btforagf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.78E+03
1.47E+00
4.72E-02
4.72E-02
ND
ND
A-3-161
-------
TABLE A-3-33
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 4-BROMOPHENYL-PHENYLETHER (101-55-3)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
5aw (day/kg FW)
Bartfk (day/kg FW)
Bam (day/kg FW)
SfloUfctm (day/kg FW)
(uni^fessFW tissue)
AiF^(L/kgFW)
B.£4/kA (uniUess)
Ba^t value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
Bow value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
Ba^t value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
andmultiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Bam value was calculated by using the correlation equation with X™ that is
citea in California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
•Sffctoto. value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef
(15/19) and multiplying it with the Baterf value.
-
BAFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value above 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying
a food chain multiplier (FCM) with an estimated BCF. BCFs were estimated
using the correlation equation obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and
Caroll (1980). FCMs were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc)— See Appendix
A-3.
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
8.74E-04
2.76E-03
3.34E-03
8.74E-01
2.18E-03
NA
1.46E+04
NA
Health Benchmarks
SJD (mg/kg/day)
Ora/CSF (mg/kg/day)-1
/yC(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF fag/m3)-*
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)''
U.S. EPA (1997a)
-
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 nrVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
5.80E-02
ND
2.03E-01
ND
ND
Note:
NA • Not applicable
ND - No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-162
-------
TABLE A-3-34
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE (85-68-7)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MF(g/mole)
rm(K)
Vp(atia)
5(mg/L)
ff(atm-m3/mol)
A,(cm2/s)
A,(cm2/s)
K^, (unitless)
^(mL/g)
JftUcm'/g)
Ai4,(LJKg)
Ai/fa (cmVg)
fag {year)'1
Fv (unitless)
• > .- Reference and Explanation
Equations *
Chemical/Physical Properties
Howard (1989-1993)
Howard (1989-1993)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
H value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl,
and Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was
calculated by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kds value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil.
Measured organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to
calculate Kda because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic
carbon in soil. Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Koc value
that is provided in this table.
Kd.» value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in
suspended sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific
to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies,
depending on the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment.
Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by using the Koc value mat is provided
in this table.
Kdp value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should
be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies depending on the fraction of
organic fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated
by using the KK value that is provided in this table.
J&gvalue was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in
Howard, Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977).
Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is
provided in this table.
-
--
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6; B-2-8;
B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6; B-4-21
B-4-20
--
-
B-l-3; B-l-4; B-l-5;
B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4; B-2-5;
B-2-6; B-2-10; B-3-
3; B-3-4; B-3-5; B-3-
6; B-4-3; B-4-4;
B-4-5; B-4-6;
B-4-10;B-4-ll
B-4-16; B-4-18;
B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-2;B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7; B-3-8;
B-4-1; B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Value
312.39
238.0
1.58E-08
at25°C
(liquid)
2.58E400
1.91E-06
1.65E-02
5.17E-06
2.59E+04
1.37E404
1.37E+02
1.03E+03
5.50E+02
3.61E+01
0.963708
A-3-163
-------
TABLE A-3-34
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE (85-68-7)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Vahie
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, Hg/g DW plant .
'/jg/mL soil -water
(ftg/g DW plant.
l*gfg soil
Br^gfg DW plant,
pglg soil
ffig/g DW plant.
Vg/g soil
fttg/g DW plant.
fjg/g air
.ytglgDW plant.
l*gfg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is
cited in Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight
basis by using a moisture content of 87 percent.
Brr
-------
TABLE A-3-34
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FORBUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE (85-68-7)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Biotransfer Factors for Animals (Continued)
Bapork (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
£«*<**, (day/kg FW)
aCFji*
(L/kgFW tissue)
JMFjuOAgFW)
ESAFfck (unitless)
S/D (mg/kg/day)
Ora/CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
RJC(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
•ZteUrt value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Bate^ value.
Ba value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is
citea in California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using
the KM, value that is provided in this table.
•SdUfcfen value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef
(15/19) and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
-
BAFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value above 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying
a food chain multiplier (FCM) with an estimated BCF. BCFs were estimated
using the correlation equation obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and
Caroll (1980). FCMs were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc)— See Appendix
A-3.
-
Health Benchmarks
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 m3/day and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
~
-
Equations
Value
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
7.87E-04
2.06E-01
5.13E-04
NA
2.35E+03
NA
2.00E-01
ND
7.00E-01
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-165
-------
TABLE A-3-35
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CADMIUM (7440-43-9)
(Page 1 of 4)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation ' : '
Equations "•$ l: ^^ Value 'i:;-v?
Chemical/Physical Properties
Wfetoole)
2"mCK)
f>(atm)
S(mg/L)
#(atnvmVmol)
£>.(cm2/s)
A,(cmVs)
/fw (unitless)
/^(mL/g)
£4(mL/g)
tokOUKg)
Aik(mL/g)
fog (year)'1
Fv (unitiess)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
All metals, except mercury, are assumed to be nonvolatile at ambient
temperatures.
All metals, except mercury, are assumed to be insoluble in water.
//value is assumed to be zero, because the Vp and S values are zero for all
metals, except mercury.
DB value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Devalue was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
-
-
Kd, value was obtained from U.S. EPA (1996a), which provides pH-based
values that were estimated by using the MINTEQ2 geochemical speciation
model.
Kdf, value is assumed to be same as the Kds value, because organic carbon does
not play a major role in sorption for the metals, as cited in U.S. EPA (1994f).
Kdt, value is assumed to be same as the Kds value, because organic carbon does
not play a major role in sorption for the metals, as cited in U.S. EPA (1994f).
-
Because they are nonvolatile, metals are assumed to be 100 percent in
participate phase and zero percent in the vapor phase, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994f).
-
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18;
B-4-24
B-4-16;
B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
112.41
594.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
8.16E-02
9.45E-06
NA
NA
15atpH=4.9;
75atpH=6.8;
4.3E+03 at
pH=8.0
15atpH=4.9;
75atpH=6.8;
4.3E+03 at
pH=8.0
15atpH=4.9;
75atpH=6.8;
4.3E+03 at
pH=8.0
ND
0.000000
A-3-166
-------
TABLE A-3-35
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CADMIUM (7440-43-9)
(Page 2 of 4)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation , '
Equations | ' Value *
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, y,glg DW plant .
' fj.g/mL soil water
Brroot/eg
,Hglg DW plant ,
pg/g soil
Brag
,Hglg DW plant.
/*g/g soil
Bfforage
,Vg/g DW plant.
/j.g/g soil
Bfgratn
,Hglg DW plant.
l^g/g soil
B^
,t*g/g DW plant.
l^glg air
Bvforage
^glg DWplant^
Uglg air
BrraoMg value was calculated by multiplying the uptake slope factor with a
conversion factor of 2 x 109 g/ha soil. The uptake slope factor and the
conversion factor were obtained from U.S. EPA (1992b) for root vegetables.
Brag value for fruits was calculated by multiplying the uptake slope factor with
a conversion factor of 2 xlO9 g/ha soil. The uptake slope factor and the
conversion factor were obtained from U.S. EPA (1993e) for garden fruits. Br
value for vegetables was calculated by weighting the uptake slope factors for
garden fruits (75%) and leafy vegetables (25%) and multiplying the result with
a conversion factor of 2 xl(r g/ha soil. The uptake slope factors and the
conversion factor were obtained from U.S. EPA (1993e).
The weighted average Brag value for aboveground produce was obtained as
follows: (1) Bra, values for fruits combined with a human consumption rate of
fruits of 1.44E-03 kg/kg/day, and (2) Br values for vegetables combined with a
human consumption rate of vegetables oil .49E-03 kg/kg/day.
Br fo,age value was calculated by multiplying the uptake slope factor with a
conversion factor of 2 x 10' g/ha soil. The uptake slope factor and the
conversion factor were obtained from U.S. EPA (1992b) for leafy vegetables.
Br ^^ value was calculated by multiplying the uptake slope factors with a
conversion factor of 2 x 109 g/ha soil. The uptake slope factor and the
conversion factor were obtained from U.S. EPA (1992b) for grains/cereals.
Metals are assumed to not experience air-to-leaf transfer, as cited in
U.S.EPA,(1995b).
Metals are assumed to not experience air-to-leaf transfer, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b).
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-8
B-3-8
B-2-8
B-3-8
ND
6.40E-02
1.25E-01
3.64E-01
6.20E-02
NA
NA
A-3-167
-------
TABLE A-3-35
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CADMIUM (7440-43-9)
(Page 3 of 4)
PftirJiKiictcir
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Saw(day/kgFW)
Ba^ (day/Teg FW)
Sam (day/kg FW)
#«Uw« (day/kg FW)
jBCFjM
(L/kgFW tissue)
B^CL/kgFW)
jB.£4F^i (unitless)
5amfflt values were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995a) for cadmium, selenium, and
zinc. Values were calculated by dividing uptake slopes, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1992b; 1995a), by a daily consumption rate of 20 kilograms dry
weight per day and converting the result to a wet weight basis assuming a 87%
moisture content in milk.
Jtow values were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995a) for cadmium, selenium, and
zinc. Values were calculated by dividing uptake slopes, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1992b; 1995a), by a daily consumption rate of 20 kilograms dry
weight per day and converting the result to a wet weight basis assuming a 70%
moisture content in beef.
-Bo-art values were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995a) for cadmium, selenium, and
zinc. Values were calculated by dividing uptake slopes, as cited hi
U.S. EPA (1992b; 1995a), by a daily consumption rate of 4.7 kilograms dry
weight per day and converting the result to a wet weight basis assuming a 70%
moisture content hi pork.
BOf— values were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995a) for cadmium, selenium, and
zinc. Values were calculated by dividing uptake slopes, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1992b; 1995a), by a daily consumption rate of 0.2 kilograms dry
weight per day and converting the result to a wet weight basis assuming a 75%
moisture content in eggs.
•B^outioi values were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995a) for cadmium, selenium,
anozinc. Values were calculated by dividing uptake slopes, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1992b; 1995a), by a daily consumption rate of 0.2 kilograms dry
weight per day and converting the result to a wet weight basis assuming a 75%
moisture content in chicken.
Geometric mean value obtained from various literature sources (see
Appendix A3.4).
—
—
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
6.50E-06
1.20E-04
1.91E-04
2.50E-03
1.06E-01
2.50E+02
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RJD (water)
(mg/kg/day)
SjDffood)
(mg/kgAwy)
OralCSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
^/U (mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(MgAn3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S.EPA(1997b)
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
Calculated from RfD (food) value using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a
human body weight of 70 kg.
U.S.EPA(1997b)
U.S.EPA(1997c)
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
5.0E-04
l.OE-03
6.3E+00
3.5E-03
1.8E-03
6.3E+00
A-3-168
-------
TABLE A-3-35
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CADMIUM (7440-43-9)
(Page 4 of 4)
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-169
-------
TABLE A-3-36
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CARBON BISULFIDE (75-15-0)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value,
Chemical/Physical Properties
W(g/mole)
rm(K)
*5?(atm)
S(mg/L)
#(atm-m3/mol)
Z>.(cm2/s)
A,(cmVs)
Kf* (unitless)
^(mL/g)
*y,(cmVg)
&k(L/Kg)
ATdi.CcmVg)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, andHeckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, andHeckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
# value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
A, value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
KM value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). KK value was calculated by using the recommended K&, value
that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kof that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate &/„
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Km value that is provided in
this table.
Kdy, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koq that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^, value
was calculated by using the K^. value that is provided in this table.
Kdr,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited hi
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by using the
KK value that is provided hi this table.
~
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
—
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
76.14
161.5
4.47E-01
at25°C
(liquid)
2.67E+03
1.27E-02
1.04E-01
1.29E-05
l.OOE+02
5.14E+01
5.14E-01
3.86E+00
2.06E+00
A-3-170
-------
TABLE A-3-36
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CARBON BISULFIDE (75-15-0)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter - ,s
Reference and Explanation
Equations 1 Value •
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksgfyear)'1
Fv (unitless)
Ksg value was assumed to be 0 due to a lack of data.
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12;B-5-l
0.0
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, ng/g DW plant -
* fj-g/mL soil water'
fir
orrootveg
,/tg/g DW plant.
fj.g/g soil
Brag
,Vg/g DW plant.
Uglg soil
Brf°rase
^g/g DW plant.
Uglg soil
Bv°*
,Hglg DW plant.
Uglg air
Bvjorag,
,IJ.glg DW plant.
Mg/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Br^ng value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table (see section A3.4.2 of Appendix A-3).
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Brj&a& value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KW value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K and #that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided in this
table.
Bvforag? value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and VigM (1992); then reducing this value by a factor oflOO,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and K^ values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.44E+01
2.79E+01
2.70E+00
2.70E+00
5.92E-04
5.92E-04
A-3-171
-------
TABLE A-3-36
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CARBON BISULFIDE (75-15-0)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation , 1 Equations -'^-l ; ^ViaBe -3
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
jBflj^day/kgFW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
JJo,^ (day/kg FW)
£0c*a« (
-------
TABLE A-3-37
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CARBON TETRACHLORIDE (56-23-5)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
T
Reference and Exlanation
T
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
153.84
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
250.1
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
1.48E-01
at25°C
(liquid)
S(mg/L)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
7.92E+02
/?(atm-m3/mol)
.ff value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
2.87E-02
A,(cm'/s)
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
3.56E-02
Av(cm2/s)
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
B-4-20
9.77E-06
Km (unitless)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
5.21E+02
Geometric mean of measured values was obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
1.52E+02
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation wither that is cited hi
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the K.. value that is provided in
this table.
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
1.52E+00
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to sue
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon hi suspended sediment. Recommended Kd value
was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in this table.
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
1.14E+01
£4. (cmVg)
B-4-16; B-4-25
6.08E+00
. , ,
should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kd,,, value was calculated by
using the K^ value that is provided in this table.
A-3-173
-------
TABLE A-3-37
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CARBON TETRACHLORIDE (56-23-5)
(Page 2 of 3)
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ktg (year)'1
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991)
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
7.03E-01
Fv (unitless)
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, Hg/g DW plant .
"uglmL soil water'
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
B-2-10
3.50E+01
(vK,ii DW plant.
V -'-soil '
•&.
in
.««» vaiue was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
Unstable (see section A3.4.2 of Appendix A-3).
B-2-10
2.30E+01
,Hglg DWplant^
pglg soil
Br value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
B-2-9
1.04E400
DW plant.
soil
Br, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in'Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided hi this table.
B-3-9
1.04E+00
(Hglg DW plant.
V .._,_ aif >
Bv value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
citeH in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
B-2-8
ce , , , , ,
Chemello, Calamari, and VigM (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KW values that are provided in this tabje.
1.52E-03
ffgfg air
BVhn.. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and Hthat is
cifedm Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, andVighi (1990); andBacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and VigW (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided in this table.
B-3-8
1.52E-03
A-3-174
-------
TABLE A-3-37
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CARBON TETRACHLORIDE (56-23-5)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
-. Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Baa!llt (day/kg FW)
&%«, (day/kg FW)
Bapmk (day/kg FW)
Barear(day/kgFW)
Afeu. (day/kg FW)
*CFj»
(L/kg FW tissue)
AtfjaOUkgFW)
BSAFjkk (unitless)
5amat value was calculated by using the correlation equation wither that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ba,^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba • k value was calculated by using thethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
ana multiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A3.4.2 of Appendix A-3).
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
BaMcta, value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Babe^ value (see section A3.4.3 of Appendix A-3).
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF values were geometric mean laboratory or field derived
values obtained from various literature sources cited in U.S. EPA (1998)— See
Appendix A-3.
-
--
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
4.14E-06
1.30E-05
1.58E-05
4.14E-03
1.03E-05
3.00E+01
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
/?/D (mg/kg/day)
Ora/ CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
/?/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
Gug/m3)-'
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997b)
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997c)
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
7.00E-04
1.30E-01
2.50E-03
1.50E-05
5.30E-02
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-175
-------
TABLE A-3-38
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CHLORDANE (57-74-9)
(Page 1 of 3)
Pftrftmeier
Reference anil Explanation
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties
MKfe/mole)
rm(K)
Vp (atm)
S(mg/L)
//(atm-nP/mol)
A,(cmVs)
A,(cmVs)
^(unitless)
J^OnL/g)
JsT4(cmVg)
JSCfL/Kg)
Kd>. (cmVg)
fastyeary1
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
//value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dv value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited hi U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean of measured values was obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kof that is cited hi
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kda
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon hi soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided hi
this table.
JTaL value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumeaorganic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon hi suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the K,, value that is provided in this table.
Kdh, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with KM that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumea organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdt,, because the value varies depending on the fraction
of organic carbon hi bottom sediment. Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by
using the K^. value that is provided in this table.
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life hi soil, as cited hi Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
-
.
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10;B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
Value
409.80
381.1
3.55E-08
at25°C
(solid)
5.51E-01
2.64E-05
1.18E-02
4.37E-06
8.66E+05
5.13E+04
5.13E+02
3.85E-KB
2.05E+03
1.83E-01
A-3-176
-------
TABLE A-3-38
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CHLORDANE (57-74-9)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Fv (unitless)
' Reference and Explanation . •
*• Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using S, Tm and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
0.997476
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, pg/g DW plant .
' ftg/mL soil water
,/ig/g DW plant.
(ig/g soil
,pglg DW plant-.
Uglg soil
,pg/g DW plant.
pg/g soil
,/ig/g DW plant.
/j.g/g air
Bvforage
' (I^S/S DW plant.
/j.g/g air
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
•OM* FW)
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the AL, value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using •
a moisture content of 87 percent.
^Vt WK value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in fiiis table (see section A4.3.2 of Appendix A-3).
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation withX^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Brfgag, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
BVag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, and #that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
Bvfragf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
citedin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and VigM (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamttk value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Batetf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
B-3-1 1
B-3-10
8.67E+03
1.69E401
1.43E-02
1.43E-02
4.46E+03
4.46E+03
6.88E-03
2.17E-02
A-3-177
-------
TABLE A-3-38
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CHLORDANE (57-74-9)
(Page 3 of 3)
PnyntQCtcr
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Bflj!B(day/kgFW)
#«Ufcta, (day/kg FW)
BGFli,!
(Ukg FW tissue)
JS^OJkgFW)
BSAFju, (unitless)
jyD (mg/kg/day)
Ora/CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
#C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
0*g/m3)''
Inhalation CSF
(ms/kg/day)"1
Reference and Explanation
Equations | Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals (Continued)
Ba—i value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba,^ value (see section A4.3.2 of Appendix A-3).
Ba value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
CafiTornia EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
BctM&n value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
anomultiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A4.3.3 of Appendix A-3).
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF*,,. value calculated using the correlation equation with^,
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980)— See Appendix A-3.
—
—
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Health Benchmarks
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S.EPA(1997b)
U.S.EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997b)
Value based on Oral CSF assuming route-to-route extrapolation.
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
2.63E-02
6.88E+00
1.72E-02
6.07E-01
NA
NA
5.00E-01
3.50E-01
7.00E-04
l.OOE-04
3.50E-01
Note:
NA - Not applicable
ND * No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-178
-------
TABLE A-3-39
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CHLORINE (7782-50-5)
(Page 1 of 3)
, Parameter
A0F(g/mole)
Tm(°K)
Vp (atm)
S(mg/L)
^(atm-mVmol)
A,(cm2/s)
Z)w(cmVs)
Km (unitiess)
^(mL/g)
Kds(mL/g)
Kd^(UKg)
Kdi, (mL/g)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitiess)
• • Reference and Explanation
Equations
- Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
-
-
"*~
—
-
-
-
-
- •
-
Because they are nonvolatile, metals are assumed to be 100 percent in
particulate phase and zero percent in the vapor phase, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994f).
-
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16; B-4-18;
B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-l;B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
71.90
172.1
ND
ND
ND
1.10E-01
1.27E-05
NA
NA
ND
i
ND
ND
ND
1.000000
A-3-179
-------
TABLE A-3-39
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CHLORINE (7782-50-5)
(Page 2 of 3)
!PnyniiEi|Batci*
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, uglg WW plant .
*HglmL soil water'
Br^^
.Uglg DWplant^
t*g/g soil
Br«
^g/g DWplant^
Uglg soil
AW
,Hg/g DW plant.
Hgfg soil
Bv«
^glg DWplant^
l*g/g air
*w
^g/g DW plant j
Hg/g air
"™*
~~
™~
™~
~*
™~
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^tt (day/kg FW)
So^Cday/kgFW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
BC^ (day/kg FW)
BCF^t (day/Teg FW)
SCFM™
(WcgFW)
&«k*(L/kgFW)
B&IF^ (unitlcss)
Bamia. values were obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984) for all
inorganics, except cadmium, mercury, selenium, and zinc.
#
-------
TABLE A-3-39
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CHLORINE (7782-50-5)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation >
Health Benchmarks
RjD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(ing/kg/day)-1
fl/CXmg/m3)
Inhalation URF
0/g/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
U.S. EPA 1994e or U.S. EPA 1995c
-
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
-
-
Equations
Vatae *
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
l.OE-01
ND
3.5E-01
ND
ND
Note:
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-181
-------
TABLE A-3-40
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL (59-50-7)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
^''-Valuev*
Chemical/Physical Properties
MKfe/mole)
Fm(K)
Vp(aim)
S(mg/L)
//(atm-mVmol)
Z>,(cmVs)
A,(cmVs)
^(unitless)
^(mL/g)
!T4(cm3/g)
&/w(L/Kg)
/^(cm'/g)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
-
U.S.EPA (1992a)
—
Da value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Dw value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995).
Kx value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ for
phthalates and PAHs, all nonioruzing organics except phthalates, PAHs,
dioxins, and fiirans, cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). Kx value was calculated by
using the recommended K^ value that is provided in this table.
Kd. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^ that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil.
Measured organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to
calculate Kda because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic
carbon in soil. Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Koc value
that is provided in this table.
KeL. value was calculated by using the correlation equation vntiaK^. that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in
suspended sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific
to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies,
depending on the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment.
Recommended Kd^, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided
in this table.
Kdt, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kac that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending
on the fraction of organic carbon in bottom sediment Recommended Kdbs value
was calculated by using the Kac value that is provided in this table.
-
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
~~
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-3-3; B-3-4;
B-3-5; B-3-6;
B-4-3; B-4-4;
B-4-5; B-4-6;
B-4-10;B-4-ll
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
142.58
328.6
ND
3.85E+03
ND
6.96E-02
8.06E-06
1.26E+03
3.71E+03
3.71E+01
2.78E+02
1.48E+02
A-3-182
-------
TABLE A-3-40
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL (59-50-7)
(Page 2 of 3)
'Parameter^
" .Reference and Explanation '„*"'
Equations
Value 1
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
fog (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in
Lucius (1992).
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-1; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
1.10E+01
ND
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, tJ-glg DW plant ,
^fj.g/mL soil water''
,Hglg DW plant \
Uglgsoil
,fj,glg DW plant.
Vg/g soil
,H-glg DW plant.
/j.g/g soil
^Ig/gDW plant
fj.g/g air
,jj.glg DW plant.
Vg/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided hi this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight
basis by using a moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroope value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value
provided in this table.
Br o, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the KW value that is provided in this table.
Brforey value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the KW value that is provided in this table.
"
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
6.30E+01
1.70E+00
6.25E-01
6.25E-01
ND
ND
A-3-183
-------
TABLE A-3-40
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 4-CHLORO-3-METHYLPHENOL (59-50-7)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation .--.-,/• '.'-•-. :.>",; ; V '-.•
-•-";!J£fluaitonis'-:' <:
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^n (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Bfl^,t (day/kg FW)
Ba,^ (day/kg FW)
^flUfcto, (day/kg FW)
flCKi.*
(L/kgFW tissue)
a^CUkgFW)
BSAFfa, (unitless)
Sa^tt value was calculated by using the correlation equation withJS^, that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
2faw value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using
the K^, value that is provided in this table.
Ba k value was calculated by using the fet content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
anomultiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is
cited in California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using
the K^ value that is provided in this table.
BaMdxn value was calculated by using the fet content ratio of chicken to beef
(15/19) and multiplying it with the Ba^^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCFf,h value calculated using the correlation equation with
Km obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980)— See Appendix
A-3.
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Health Benchmarks
Sfl> (mg/kg/day)
Ow/ CSF (mg/kg/day)-'
/yC(mg/m})
Inhalation URFfag/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
-
-
-
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
=--: -Value "•>
l.OOE-05
3.16E-05
3.83E-05
l.OOE-02
2.50E-05
1.34E+02
NA
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Note:
NA - Not applicable
ND - No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-184
-------
TABLE A-3-41
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR P-CHLOROANILINE (106-47-8)
(Page 1 of 3)
^ A\^'
Parameter ,, .
AflT(g/mole)
r»(K)
P>(atm)
S(mg/L)
jff(atm-m3/mol)
A,(cm2/s)
Z>w(cm2/s)
.£„„, (unitless)
#OT(mL/g)
JBUcmVg)
J&kCLflCg)
£4 (cmVg)
Refereace aad Explaaation
Equations
Value
. Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
//value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided hi this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited hi U.S. EPA (1994c).
For all ionizing organics, Km values were estimated on the basis of pH. Estimated
values were obtained from U.S. EPA (1994c).
Kd< value was calculated by using the correlation equation withX^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon hi soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kda
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon hi soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
JKaL value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 hi suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon hi suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon hi suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the K^. value that is provided in this table.
Kdb! value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited hi
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 hi bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon hi bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Kac value that is provided in this table.
-
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
—
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
127.57
345.6
3.09E-05
at25°C
(solid)
3.36E+03
1.17E-06
4.80E-02
1.02E-05
7.40E+01
Kocis4l
forpH
range of
4.9 to 8
4.06E-01
3.05E+00
1.63E+00
A-3-185
-------
TABLE A-3-41
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR P-CHLOROANBLINE (106-47-8)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation < '
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitiess)
Ksg value was assumed to be 0 due a a lack of data.
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that
are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a liquid
phase value before being used in the calculations.
Equations
Value
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8;B-4-l;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, ttg/g DW plant .
% UglmL soil water
(Vg/8 DW plant.
Uglg soil
,/jg/g DW plant j
l*g/g soil
.Hg/g DW plant.
f*g/g soil
AW
.ttg/g DW plant.
Uglg air
.yglg DW plant.
(tglg air
.RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A!^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
-S'VoocwK value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in tnistable.
Braf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with AT^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^, value that
is provided in this table.
Brggege value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Travis and Anns (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
K^ value that is provided in this table.
BVfy value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and ffthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided in this table.
Bvfarfif value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited m Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vigm (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 2S°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
0.0
0.999993
1.27E+01
3.12E+01
3.22E400
3.22E+00
4.66E+00
4.66E+00
A-3-186
-------
TABLE A-3-41
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR P-CHLOROANILINE (106-47-8)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
' ' ~ *' «' Reference and Explanation „ x' '>"" ' " \ - Equations
* 'Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^k (day/kg FW)
50^ (day/kg FW)
Bapmk (day/kg FW)
jfci^Cday/kgFW)
BaMte (day/kg FW)
*GFj»
(L/kg FW tissue)
AiF^OAgFW)
BSAFf,h (unitless)
5amfft value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^,
value mat is provided in this table.
Bdtetf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited hi
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Bapork value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba,^ value.
Ba.^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
Bad***, value was calculated by using the fet content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCFju, value calculated using the correlation equation with K^
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
5.88E-07
1.86E-06
2.25E-06
5.88E-04
1.47E-06
1.55E+01
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
^/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
G"g/m3)-'
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-'
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
Calculated from RjD using an inhalation rate of 20 m'/day and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
4.00E-03
ND
1.40E-02
ND
ND
Note:
NA= Not applicable
ND= No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-187
-------
TABLE A-3-42
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CHLOROBENZENE (108-90-7)
(Page 1 of 3)
P&rftmctcr
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties
MFF(g/mole)
r«(K)
Pp(atm)
5(mg/L)
H(atavm3/mol)
A,(cms/s)
A,(cmVs)
t^ (unitless)
A^(mL/g)
JC^CcmVg)
J&k(L/Kg)
K^ (cmVg)
fag (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the Mfr,S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
£>„ value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kol that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd,,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in
this table.
Kd-,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kol. that is cited in
U.S., EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate JKdL, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended! sediment. Recommended Kd^, value
was calculated by using the K^. value that is provided in this table.
Kdt, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumedorganic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by
using the KK value that is provided in this table.
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
-
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
--
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
Value
112.56
228.1
1.59E-02
at25°C
(liquid)
4.09E+02
4.38E-03
6.35E-02
9.49E-06
6.16E-H)2
2.24E+02
2.24E+00
1.68E-H)!
8.96E+00
1.69E+00
1.000000
A-3-188
-------
TABLE A-3-42
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CHLOROBENZENE (108-90-7)
(Page 2 of 3)
•Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value" •
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
. uglg DW plant .
' UglmL soil -water
^^rootveg
,Hglg DW plant.
pg/g soil
Br,g
,pg/g DW plant.
Uglg soil
Bl"f>rage
,lJ.glg DW plant.
fj.g/g soil
*W
,IJ.glg DW plant.
Uglg air
i
BVforige
,IMglg DW plant.
pglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
BrrcMvC? value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table.
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
Brgrage value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KW value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, and #that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a iactor oflOO.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
Bvfoys? value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and £f that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor oflOO.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
stnAK^ values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8.
3.90B+01
1.74E+01
9.45E-01
9.45E-01
1.19E-02
1.19E-02
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamilk (day/kg FW)
Ba^f (day/kg FW)
Bapork (day/kg FW)
Bafgg (day/kg FW)
£«c*cta (day/kg FW)
Bamat value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by usmg the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Bapork value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Baeg, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
SaMckm value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^^ value.
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
4.89E-06
1.55E-05
1.87E-05
4.89E-03
1.22E-05
A-3-189
-------
TABLE A-3-42
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CHLOROBENZENE (108-90-7)
(Page 3 of 3)
. ' Reference and Explanation ••••'[• ---^ - ":>:;.-V;^TV •"••':
Biotransfer Factors for Animals (Continued)
(L/kgFW tissue)
2MFM (L/kgFW)
BSAFju, (unitless)
J^D (mg/kg/day)
OralCSF
(rng/kg/day)-'
ItfC (rug/in3)
Inhalation URF
Inhalation CSF
(rag/kg/day)"'
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCFM value calculated using the correlation equation with A^,
obtained fiom Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980)— See Appendix A-3.
—
—
Health Benchmarks
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
U.S. EPA (1997c)
-
-
•Xteu&fcZi
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
7.76E-HH
NA
NA
2.0E-02
ND
2.0E-02
ND
ND
Note:
NA-Not applicable
NIX No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-190
-------
TABLE A-3-43
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CHLOROBENZILATE (510-15-6)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter -
' : Reference and Explanation
" Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
Mf(g/mole)
r.OO
Vp (atm)
S(mg/L)
//(amvmVmol)
A,(cm2/s)
£>w(cm2/s)
A^,, (unitless)
^(mL/g)
Kds(cm3/g)
Kd^QJKs)
J&UcmVg)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Howard (1989-1993)
Howard (1989-1993)
Howard (1989-1993)
.ff value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Rvalues that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from WATERS model database (U.S. EPA 1995d).
£>w value was obtained from WATERS model database (U.S. EPA 1995d).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995).
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and fiirans, cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). Kac value was calculated by using the recommended K^ value -
that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A! that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Km value that is provided in
this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment Recommended Ka^, value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kdg value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by
using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
;
' -
-
—
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
—
.—
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4;B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
325.20
309.0
2.90E-09
at 25°C
(solid)
1.30E+01
7.24E-08
1.65E-02
4.72E-06
2.40E+04
3.69E+03
3.69E+01
2.77E+02
1.48E+02
A-3-191
-------
TABLE A-3-43
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CHLOROBENZILATE (510-15-6)
(Page 2 of 3)
Reference aad ExDianatkra
I Eau«tioni I V«lae
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
B-l-2;B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
7.23E400
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that
ate provided in this table. Rvalue for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used hi the calculations.
B-l-1;B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8;B-4-l;
B-4-8;B-4-9;
B-4-12;B-5-l
0.861816
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
DW plant .
soil -water
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited hi
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the £L value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent
B-2-10
5.54E+02
Br,
Br^f- value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table.
B-2-10
1.50E+01
Hgtg soil
Br value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was .made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in mis table.
B-2-9
1.14E-01
Br,
, DW plant)
pglg soil
Br^-n value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value mat is provided hi this table.
B-3-9
1.14E-01
air
fiv_ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, and //that is
citea in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaga,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Rvalues that are provided in this table.
B-2-8
3.57E+04
Bv,
, DW plant)
(tg/g air
Bve,—, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, and //that is
citeoin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gagra,
Chemello, Calamari, and VigM (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and K^, values that are provided hi this table.
B-3-8
3.57E404
A-3-192
-------
TABLE A-3-43
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CHLOROBENZILATE (510-15-6)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
- v Reference and Explanation " \£ "v ' VSX' 4 '.Eqaattoas
^'vVdae"
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamttk (day/kg FW)
jBa^day/kgFW)
AV* (day/kg FW)
Baegg (day/kg FW)
BacMcta, (day/kg FW)
(L/kgFW tissue)
£47^ (L/kgFW)
BSAFf,,, (unitless)
fiam/ft value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Anns (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with AL, that is cited in
Travis and Anns (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^,
value that is provided in this table.
Bag,,* value was calculated by using thethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
BaMdm value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
—
BAFs were used for compounds with a log Km value above 4.0, as cited in U.S. EPA
(1 995b). BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying a food chain
multiplier (FCM) with an estimated BCF. BCFs were estimated using the
correlation equation obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980).
FCMs were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc) — See Appendix A-3.
- .
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
1.91E-04
6.03E-04
7.29E-04
1.91E-01
4.76E-04
NA
2.03E403
NA
Health Benchmarks
RJD (mg/kg/day)
OralCSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
fl/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
0"g/m3)-'
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1995b)
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
U.S. EPA (1997c)
U.S. EPA (1997c)
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
G-2-2
2.0E-02
2.7E-01
7.0E-02
7.8E-06
2.7E-01
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-193
-------
TABLE A-3-44
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE (75-45-6)
(Pagel of 4)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation"- ''•:-':: ' ••'-. :-••->' .-,'^i ."••';" ! --v- •• ••. ; C- : ;;-; :v :
Chemical/Physical Properties
AW(g/moIe)
7*n(K)
Vp(a.tio)
S(mg/L)
.HXatnvm'Anol)
D.(cmVs)
A,(cmVs)
Ik^ (unitless)
^(mL/g)
Jtf,(cmVg)
Howard 1989-1993
Howard 1989-1993
Vp value cited in Howard 1989-1993.
Howard 1989-1993
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated by
using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
£)„ value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Devalue was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Calculated using the log Km value cited in Howard 1989-1993.
KM value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for phthalates and
PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans, cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). Ky. value was calculated by using the recommended K^ value that is
provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0( that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd,,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this
table.
Equations
w^Vahie^ir
-
-
—
-
B-l-6;
B-2-6;
B-2-8;
B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-
12;
B-4-19
B-l-6;
B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-
6; B-4-21
B-4-20
-
B-l-3;
B-l-4;
B-l-5;
B-l-6;
B-2-3;
B-2-4;
B-2-5;
B-2-6; B-2-
10; B-3-3;
B-3-4;
B-3-5; B-3-
6; B-4-3;
B-4-4;
B-4-5;
B-4-6;
B-4-10;
B-4-11
86.47
126.6
5.63
at25°C
(liquid)
2.90E+03
1.68E-01
9.72E-02
1.13E-05
1.20E+01
9.83E+00
9.83E-02
A-3-194
-------
TABLE A-3-44
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE (75-45-6)
. (Page 2 of 4)
Parameter
- Reference and Explanation > " " '
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
JGUonVg)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Kdi. value was calculated by using the correlation equation wither,,,, that is cited in U.S.
EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be used
to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon
in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by using the Kx value
that is provided in this table.
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991) OR Howard (1989-1993) OR
Mackay, Shiu, and Ma (1992).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in the table.
B-4-16;
B-4-25
B-l-2;
B-2-2;
B-3-2;
B-4-2
B-1-1;B-
2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-
8;
B-3-1;
B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-
4-1; B-4-8;
B-4-9;B-
4-12;
B-5-1
3.93E-r01
0.0
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, pg/g DW plant -
" iMglmL soil water'
"rroatveg
,Hg/g DW plant.
Uglg soil
Brag
,/^g/g DWplant^
Hg/g soil
Bl 'forage
^glg DW plant ^
Uglg soil
Bvas
,Hg/g DW plant.
fj.g/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^, value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroo, v« value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided in
this table. . - . -
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in this table. r •
Bt 'forage value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table.
Bva, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, and .fiTthat is cited
in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi, Chemello,
Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100. No distinction
was made between values for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value
was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and K^ values that are
provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
7.88E+00
8.01E401
9.21E+00
9.21E+00
4.69E-06
A-3-195
-------
TABLE A-3-44
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE (75-45-6)
(Page 3 of 4)
1 Parameter
fftgfg DW plant*.
l*g/g air
Reference and Explanation
Equations | Value
Biotransfer Factors for Plants (continued)
Bvfr,., value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cifedin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100. No
distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the Hand
K^, values that are provided in this table.
B-3-8
4.69E-06
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamm (day/kg FW)
*"*
-------
TABLE A-3-44
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE (75-45-6)
(Page 4 of 4)
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-197
-------
r
TABLE A-3-45
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CHLOROETHANE (75-00-3)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MP(g/mole)
rm(K)
Vp(&tia)
S(mg/L)
//(atm-m'/mol)
£>« (cmVs)
A,(cmVs)
#„ (unitless)
^(mL/g)
Ki/,(cmVg)
J&kCLflCg)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Vp value cited in Lucius et al. (1992).
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1994a)
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
KM value calculated from log Km value cited in U.S. EPA (1995a).
Kx value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ for phthalates
and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans,
cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). KK value was calculated by using the recommended Km
value that is provided in this table.
Kd. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kdg, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with KOI. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
-
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
64.52
441.8
159.88
at25°C
(solid)
5.74E+03
1.80
1.27E-01
1.53E-06
1.26E+03
3.71E-H)2
3.71E+00
2.78E+01
A-3-198
-------
TABLE A-3-45
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CHLOROETHANE (75-00-3)
(Page 2 of 3)
„ Parameter
-'
£4. (on /g)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Kdfc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment.' Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that
are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-l;B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
1.48E401
6.72E+02
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, Uglg DW plant -
*Hg/mL soil water
,/j.g/g DW plant ,
jtg/g soil
,t*g/g DW plant*
pg/g soil
Srforage
^g/g DW plant j
pg/g soil
fUglg DW plant^
fj-g/g air
.Uglg DW plant,
/j.g/g air
.RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Br™,p,g value was calculated by dividing the .RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table.
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
Br forage value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM, value that is'provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
Bvforagf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and /fthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
6.30E+01
1.70E+01
6.25E-01
6.25E-01
6.05E-05
6.05E-05
A-3-199
-------
TABLE A-3-45
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CHLOROETHANE (75-00-3)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
&>** (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba,^ (day/kg FW)
Bam (day/kg FW)
j5<»rtfcto.(day'/kgFW)
BC/VM
(L/kgFW tissue)
Ati^OL/kgFW)
fi£4F^ (unitless)
jBa,^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^,
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^af value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited hi
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
So' t value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ea,^ value.
Ba~- value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited hi
Camornia EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
.ZfaUfctoi value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value below 4.0, as cited hi
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCFg,h value calculated using the correlation equation with K^
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
-
-
Equations } Value
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
l.OOE-05
3.16E-05
3.83E-05
l.OOE-02
2.50E-05
1.34E+02
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
R/D (mg/kg/day)
0«j/GSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
/yCCmg/m3)
Inhalation URF
0/g/m1)'1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/dayr
U.S.EPA (1997a)
U.S.EPA(1997b)
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
4.00E-01
ND
l.OOE+01
ND
ND
Note:
NA - Not applicable
ND - No data available
All parameters are defined fa list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-200
-------
TABLE A-3-46
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CHLOROFORM (67-66-3)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
' , * Reference and Explanation
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
r.OO
f£(atm)
S(mgfL)
#(amvm3/mol)
A,(cm2/s)
Dw(cm2/s)
KM (unitless)
*oc(mL/g)
Kd,(cm3/B)
^(L/Kg)
AaUcmVg)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
lvalue was calculated bv using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
DK value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean of measured values was obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with-K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate/^
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Kx value that is provided in
this table.
Kd-y value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koq that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in this table.
Kdts value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kx that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumedorganic carbon of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by using the
Koc value that is provided in this table.
-
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
Value
119.39
209.6
2.69E-01
at25°C
(liquid)
7.96E-I-03
4.03E-03
5.17E-02
1.09E-05
8.90E+01
5.30E+01
5.30E-01
3.98E+00
2.12E+00
A-3-201
-------
TABLE A-3-46
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CHLOROFORM (67-66-3)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation ;* - i
Equations
Value ;
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg(year)~l
Fv (unitless)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
. Uglg DW plant ,
" uglmL soil water
.Uglg DW plant .
pg/g soil
(Hg/g DW plant \
fjg/g soil
tUglg DW plant v
fig/g soil
.(tg/g DW plant ^
tiglg air
.Uglg DW plant ^
Vg/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Bfnpptg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table (see section A4.3.2 of Appendix A-3).
Bra. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
#r&™_ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM value that is provided hi this table.
Bva. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25'C, by using the H and Km values that are provided in this
table.
Bvf*f& value Vfas calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
citedui Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25 °C, by using the H and K^ values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.41E+00
1.000000
1.37E+01
2.58E+01
2.89E+00
2.89E+00
1.65E-03
1.65E-03
A-3-202
-------
TABLE A-3-46
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CHLOROFORM (67-66-3)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter | , Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^t (day/kg FW)
5aw(day/kgFW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Baegg (day/kg FW)
At**, (day/kg FW)
*CFj»
(L/kg FW tissue)
^^(L/kgFW)
BSAFf,,, (unitless)
5amaj. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Bateef value was calculated by using the correlation equation withX^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^,
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^,rk value was calculated by using thethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A4.3.2 of Appendix A-3).
fia™ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
BacHekai value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba,^ value (see section A4.3.3 of Appendix A-3).
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF values were geometric mean laboratory or field derived
values obtained from various literature sources cited in U.S. EPA (1998)— See
Appendix A-3.
• "
_ .
Health Benchmarks
RfD (mg/kg/day)
OralCSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
5/C (mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997b)
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 orVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997c)
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
7.07E-07
2.23E-06
2.71E-06
7.07E-04
1.76E-06
3.59E+00
NA
NA
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
l.OOE-02
6.10E-03
3.50E-02
2.30E-05
8.10E-02
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-203
-------
TABLE A-3-47
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR (BIS)-1,2-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
(39638-32-9)
(Page 1 of 4)
Parameter
MF(g/mole)
r«(K)
^?(ata)
S(mg/L)
ff(atarmYmol)
£>«(cmVs)
jDw(cm2/s)
jR^,(unitless)
J^OnL/g)
tf4(cmVg)
/c^oL/Kg)
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Montgomeiy and Welkom (1991)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
/Tvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Devalue was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
K^ value cited in Howard (1989 - 1993).
KC,. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for phthalates
and PAHs, / all nonionbang organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans,
cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). K^ value was calculated by using the recommended Km
value that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kdn
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the K^. value that is provided in
this table.
KcLf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0{, that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the KK value that is provided in this table.
Equations
-
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
Valiw
171.07
369.9
7.00E-03
at25°C
(solid)
1.70E+03
7.04E-04
3.61E-02
7.38E-06
3.80E+02
1.46E+02
1.46E+00
1.46E-02
A-3-204
-------
TABLE A-3-47
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR (BIS)-1,2-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
(39638-32-9)
(Page 2 of 4)
Parameter"^ , -
M,(cm3/g)
fog (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
« Reference and Explanation ' ,'',..'
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Kdj,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kac that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdts value was calculated by
using the KM value that is provided in this table.
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Mackay,
Sh?u,andMa(1992). "
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that
are provided hi this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a liquid
phase value before being used in the calculations.
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
. ng/g DW plant -
~ fj.glmL soil water'
Brrameg
,/tg/g DW plant.
l*g/g soil
*W
,yglg DW plant,
Uglg soil
B*as
,yg/g DW plant.
pg/g air
Bvft>ran*
^g/g DWplant^
Uglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided hi this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Bfrqofag value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table.
Br^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K and /fthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing mis value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided hi mis table.
Everest value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and .//that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); men reducing this value by a factor oflOO.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and K^, values that are provided in this table.
Equations
Value :
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-l;B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8;B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
5.82E+00
1.41E+00
1.000000
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-3-8
2.88E+01
1.98E-H)!
1.25E+00
4.44-02
4.44E-02
A-3-205
-------
TABLE A-3-47
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR (BIS)-1,2-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
(39638-32-9)
(Page 3 of 4)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations •
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
£flw(day/kgFW)
Bafak (day/kg FW)
Bam (day/kg FW)
£o«*am (day/kg FW)
BCF-b*
(L/kgFW tissue)
Atf^OL/kgFW)
BSAFfj, (unitless)
Bamllt value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^tf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^,. value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Bautf value.
Be value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
BadMca, value was calculated by using the fat 'content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
andmultiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCFf,h value calculated using the correlation equation withA^,
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
?V«l«e
3.02E-06
9.55E-06
1.16E-05
3.02E-03
7.54E-06
5.38EH-01
NA
NA
A-3-206
-------
TABLE A-3-47
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR (BIS)-1,2-CHLOROISOPROPYLETHER
(39638-32-9)
(Page 4 of 4)
Parameter *
: . • ' * Reference and Explanation ^
Equations
Value
Health Benchmarks
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
RJC(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
fag/in3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
~
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
4.0E-02
ND
1.4E-01
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-207
-------
r
TABLE A-3-48
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE (91-58-7)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation , , v •;, ,
''':'• lansrtioiis ^ I •.',' VViilue^'
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
rm(K)
i^(atm)
S(mg/L)
jfiT(atnvmVmol)
l>.(cmVs)
£)w(cms/s)
^.(unitless)
*U(mL/g)
Ar4(anVg)
j&kO/Kg)
ft/,, (cmVg)
Budavari, O'Neill, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neill, Smith, and Heckehnan (1989)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
H value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the Mff, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Devalue was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
It,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation withX^ for phthalates
and PAHs as cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). Koc value was calculated by using the
recommended K^ value that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0f that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value vanes, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd., value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited hi
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdm because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in this table.
Kd,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by using the
KK value that is provided in this table.
-
--
—
--
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
—
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
162.61
332.6
1.05E-05
at25°C
(solid)
1.20E+01
1.43E-04
3.64E-02
8.24E-06
1.17E+04
7.14E403
7.14E+01
5.36E+02
2.86E+02
A-3-208
-------
TABLE A-3-48
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE (91-58-7)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter '
Reference and Explanation
Equations
• Vatae
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Ksg value was assumed to be 0 due to a lack of data.
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using S, Tm, and Vp values
mat are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a liquid
phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
0.0
0.999974
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
• V-glg DW plant .
^/j.g/mL soil water
^glg DW plant )
pg/g soil
,/J.glg DW plant.
/j.g/g soil
,/ig/g DW plant,
pg/g soil
,/itg/g DW plant.
Vg/g air
BVforag,
,/*g/g DW plant.
fj.g/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Koy value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroofleg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table.
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
Bfforage value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM, value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the Hand K^ values that are provided in this
table.
Bvjbrasf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and Hthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the Hand Km values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-10
B-2-9; B-2-10;
B-3-9
B-2-9
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
3.23E+02
4.51E+00
1.72E-01
1.72E-01
8.46E+00
8.46E+00
A-3-209
-------
r
TABLE A-3-48
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE (91-58-7)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter | Reference and Explanation " ~
Equations *
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
tfa^jt (day/kg FW)
Ba^daytkgFW)
flo^i (day/kg FW)
Bam (day/Teg FW)
Jfcteu* (day/kg FW)
(L/kgFW tissue)
fl^trt (L/kgFW)
BSAFju, (unitless)
J?/D (mg/kg/day)
OralCSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
$t7(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
G*g/m3)-'
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
5amffit value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Bataf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
.BOporjt value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba,^ value.
Ba „ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
BaMc]ia, value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Babe^ value.
-
BAFs were used for compounds with a log Km value above 4.0, as cited hi U.S. EPA
(1995b). BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying a food chain
multiplier (FCM) with an estimated BCF. BCFs were estimated using the
correlation equation obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980).
FCAfe were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc>— See Appendix A-3.
-
Health Benchmarks
U.S.EPA(1997a)
-
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
9.33E-05
2.95E-04
3.57E-04
9.33E-02
2.33E-04
NA
9.60E+02
NA
8.00E-02
ND
2.80E-01
ND
ND
Note:
NA m Not applicable
ND ~ No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-210
-------
TABLE A-3-49
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2-CHLOROPHENOL (95-57-8)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
* Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
A0F(g/mole)
r»„ value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
For all ionizing organics, K.c values were estimated on the basis of pH. Estimated
values were obtained from U.S. EPA (1994c).
Kds value was calculated by using the correlation equation withX^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate !&„
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided hi
this table for a pH of 7.0.
-
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
128.56
282.1
2.77E-03
at25°C
(liquid)
2.15E+04
1.66E-05
5.01E-02
9.46E-06
1.45E+02
m &,c
1 398.0
2 398.0
3 398.0
4 398.0
5 397.9
6 396.9
7 387.3
8 311.8
9 108.7
10 19.43
11 7.39
12 6.14
13 6.01
14 6.00
3.87E-H)0
A-3-211
-------
TABLE A-3-49
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2-CHLOROPHENOL (95-57-8)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
^(L/Kg)
/S4(cm'/g)
teg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
;-*^,:Value/;--:
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koq that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided hi this table for a pH of 7.0.
Kdjf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with ATOI. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon of 0.04 hi bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by using the
Kx value that is provided in this table for a pH of 7.0.
Ksg value was assumed to be 0 due to a lack of data.
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited hi Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
2.90E+01
1.55E+01
0.0
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
Hg/g DW plant
UglmL soil watet
.(iglg DW plant,
Uglg soil
.pgtg DW plant,
ttg/g soil
tUglg DW plant*
Uglg soil
fffg/g DW plant,
fig/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^, value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Bfn&ytg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
hi this table.
Br^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided hi this table.
Brfy..^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM, value that is provided in this table.
jBVgy value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and //that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gagri,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and K^ values that are provided hi this
table.
B-2-10
B-2-9; B-2-10;
B-3-9
B-2-9
B-2-10
B-3-9
1.70E+01
4.40E400
2.18E400
2.18E+00
6.76E-01
A-3-212
-------
TABLE A-3-49
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2-CHLOROPHENOL (95-57-8)
(Page 3 of 3)
••>'€;:£arameter:v:;va'
Bvforage
,/j.g/g DW plant.
pglg air
.--•:''.. .-• ,x-V:.;:. ^-V"-.'^--^;/::"'ii«iie««^ittd3Ekpitoati««»
Equations '
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Plants (Continued)
Bvforf!ie value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and VighJ (1992); then reducing this value by a fector oflOO,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided in this
table.
B-3-8
6.76E-01
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamttt (day/kg FW)
Ba^ef (day/kg FW)
Bo^ (day/kg FW)
.Baear (day/kg FW)
l&^fe" (day/kg
•BCF^.
(L/kgFW tissue)
&4F^ (L/kgFW)
BSAF^ (unitless)
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Ora/CSF
(mg/kg/dayX1
£/C (mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/dayy1
Bamlq value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Bateg value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^t value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Baeg, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
Bachichal value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation with^
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
1.15E-06
3.64E-06
4.41E-06
1.15E-03
2.88E-06
2.59E+01
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
~
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
5.00E-03
ND
1.80E-02
ND
ND
Note:
NA= Not applicable
ND= No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-213
-------
r
TABLE A-3-50
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 3-CHLOROPHENYL-PHENYLETHER
(7005-72-3)
(Page! of 4)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
rm(K)
JJ>(atm)
S(mg/L)
,W(atnvmVmol)
JD.(cmVs)
A,(cmVs)
X^,(unitless)
^(mL/g)
Kd,(cm3/g)
tfdUL/Kg)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Vp value cited in Montgomery and Welkom (1991).
5" value cited in Montgomery and Welkom (1991).
//value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl,
and Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was
calculated by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
De value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Dw value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995).
KK value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ for
phthalates and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs,
dioxins, and furans, cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). Koc value was calculated by
using the recommended Km value that is provided in this table.
Kd. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil.
Measured organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to
calculate Kd;, because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic
carbon in soil. Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value
that is provided in this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0. that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in
suspended sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific
to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value vanes,
depending on the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment.
Recommended Kdm value was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided
in this table.
-
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-3-3; B-3-4;
B-3-5; B-3-6;
B-4-3; B-4-4;
B-4-5; B-4-6;
B-4-10;B-4-ll
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
204.66
265.1
3.55E-06
at25°C
(liquid)
3.30E+00
2.20E-04
3.82E-02
4.42E-06
5.85E+04
7.40E+04
7.40E+02
5.55E+03
A-3-214
-------
TABLE A-3-50
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 3-CHLOROPHENYL-PHENYLETHER
(7005-72-3)
(Page 2 of 4)
>>> Tj
Parameter ~
Kdhs (cm3/g)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
RCF
, uglg DW plant •.
^(j.g/mL soil water'
,H-glg DW plant.
iu.glg soil
,Hglg DW plant.
Uglg soil
(f*8/g DW plant.
pglg soil
fUglg DW plant.
figlg air
^ "- "* " „ Reference and Explanation
Equations
, Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Kdt, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending
on the fraction of organic carbon hi bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value
was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in this table.
Ksg value was assumed to be zero due to a lack of data.
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited hi Junge (1977).
Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided
in the table.
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-1; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1 ;B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
2.96E403
0.0
0.999832
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
hi Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight
basis by using a moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroot>eg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value
provided hi this table.
.Br™ value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA^ that is cited
hi Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
Br, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided hi this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km. and H that
is cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira,
Gaggi, Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a
factor of 100. No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce
and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C,
by using the Hand Km values that are provided hi this table.
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
1.09E+03
1.48E+00
6.80E-02
6.80E-02
3.03E+01
A-3-215
-------
TABLE A-3-50
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 3-CHLOROPHENYL-PHENYLETHER
(7005-72-3)
(Page 3 of 4)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
, rVaiuVl
Biotransfer Factors for Plants (Continued)
,l*gtg DW plant \
pg/g air
Bvjorqgc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H
that is cited hi Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira,
Gaggi, Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a
factor of 100. No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce
and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C,
by using the Hand K^, values that are provided in this table.
B-3-8
3.03E401
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
£a»«t (day/kg FW)
jBow (day/kg FW)
Ba^i (day/kg FW)
Bam (day/kg FW)
Bad***, (day/kg FW)
BCFu,
(L/kgFW tissue)
a4FM(L/kgFW)
BSAFfa, (unitless)
Ba^,t value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using
the KM, value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using
the KM, value that is provided in this table.
Ba^t value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Babl^ value.
Ba^. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is
cited in California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
BoMan value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef
(15/19) and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
—
BAFs were used for compounds with a log Km value above 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying
a food chain multiplier (FCM) with an estimated BCF. BCFs were estimated
using the correlation equation obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and
Caroll (1980). FCMs were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc)— See Appendix
A-3.
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Health Benchmarks
R/D (mg/kg/day)
Oa/CSF(mg^g/day)-'
#C(mg/m')
Inhalation UBF fag/m3)'1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
-
-
-
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
4.65E-04
1.47E-03
1.78E-03
4.65E-01
1.16E-03
NA
6.06E+03
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
A-3-216
-------
TABLE A-3-50
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 3-CHLOROPHENYL-PHENYLETHER
(7005-72-3)
(Page 4 of 4)
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-217
-------
TABLE A-3-51
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CHLOROPYRIFOS (2921-88-2)
(Page 1 of 4)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation '•-• -;:• ' .•>.
Equations
::.;-:~VaItte;^
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/inole)
rm(K>
J>(atm)
5(mg/L)
//(atnvmVmol)
£>.(cmVs)
A,(cm*/s)
A^» (unitless)
KK(mUg)
&/,(cmVg)
tt/w(L/Kg)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Vp value cited in Howard (1989-1993).
S value cited in Howard (1989-1993).
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using fee MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Dv value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Recommended K^ value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995).
KK value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for phthalates
and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans,
cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). Km value was calculated by using the recommended K^,
value that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kof that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd-, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
-
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
350.59
314.6
1.32E-03
at25°C
(solid)
5.00E+00
9.26E-02
3.82E-02
4.42E-06
1.82E-H)5
1.79E+04
1.79E+02
1.35E+03
A-3-218
-------
TABLE A-3-51
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CHLOROPYRIFOS (2921-88-2)
(Page 2 of 4)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation * '',
Equations
° Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
«,
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Kdfr value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon m bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kd^, value was calculated by
using the K^. value that is provided in this table.
Ksg value was assumed to 0 due to a lack of data.
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that
are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a liquid
phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
7.18E+02
0.0
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, pg/g DW plant -
*fj.g/mL soil water'
,/tg/g DW plant.
pglg soil
,/j.g/g DW plant.
pg/g soil
,/j-glg DW plant.
pg/g soil
(PS1 '8 DW plant.
fj,glg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K-, value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Brr°o
-------
TABLE A-3-51
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CHLOROPYRIFOS (2921-88-2)
(Page 3 of 4)
Parameter
AW
.Uig/g DW plant*
fig/g air
Reference and Explanation :i v ^ :v,-;:,y;Equa{fons',;'^r
Biotransfer Factors for Plants (continued)
Bvjovsf value w33 calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, and H that is
citedin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
B-3-8
;iY:';;VaIue;!,r:''':
2.42E-01
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^ak (day/kg FW)
Saw (day/kg FW)
Ba^i (day/kg FW)
Ba,a (day/kg FW)
^flrffcto, (day/kg FW)
(L/kgFW tissue)
2?^A(IJkgFW)
BSAFf* (unitless)
Bfljnffit value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Aims (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
BOf^ value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Baft, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Cambmia EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
BoMcka, value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
andrnultiplying it with the Ba^^ value.
-
BAFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value above 4.0, as cited in U.S. EPA
(1995b). BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying a food chain
multiplier (FCM) with an estimated BCF. BCFs were estimated using the
correlation equation obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980).
FCMs were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc)— See Appendix A-3.
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
1.45E-03
4.57E-03
5.53E-03
1.45E+00
3.61E-03
NA
2.81E+04
NA
A-3-220
-------
TABLE A-3-51
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CHLOROPYRIFOS (2921-88-2)
(Page 4 of 4)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations t Value
Health Benchmarks
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
RjC(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
Gug/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 nrVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
-
~
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
3.03E-03
ND
1.1E-02
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-221
-------
TABLE A-3-52
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CHROMIUM (7440-47-3)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
A0F(g/mole)
r*CK)
Vp(atm)
S(mg/L)
#(atnvmVmol)
D.(cmVs)
/UcmVs)
.^(unitless)
A^(mL/g)
/a,(«L/g)
AikCL/Kg)
Atf* (mL/g)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
All metals, except mercury, are assumed to be nonvolatile at ambient
temperatures.
All metals, except mercury, are assumed to be insoluble in water.
//value is assumed to be zero, because the Vp and S values are zero for all
metals, except mercury.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database in U.S. EPA (1994f).
Dff value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database in U.S. EPA (1994f).
—
-
Kd value was obtained from U.S. EPA (1996a), which provides pH-based
values that were estimated by using the MINTEQ2 geochemical speciation
model.
Kdn value is assumed to be same as the Kd, value, because organic carbon does
not play a major role in sorption for the metals, as cited in U.S. EPA (1994f).
Kdt, value is assumed to be same as the Kd, value, because organic carbon does
not play a major role in sorption for the metals, as cited in U.S. EPA (1994f).
-
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18;
B-4-24
B-4-16;
B-4-25
52
2,173.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.01E-01
4.63E-05
NA
NA
1.2E+03 at
pH=4.9;
1.8E+06at
pH=6.8;
4.3E+06 at
pH=8.0
1.2E+03 at
pH=4.9;
1.8E+06 at
pH=6.8;
4.3E+06 at
pH=8.0
1.2E+03 at
pH=4.9;
1.8E+06at
pH=6.8;
4.3E+06 at
pH=8.0
A-3-222
-------
TABLE A-3-52
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CHROMIUM (7440-47-3)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
'ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
• Reference and Explanation
• Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
--
Because they are nonvolatile, metals are assumed to be 100 percent hi
particulate phase and zero percent in the vapor phase, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994f).
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
ND
0.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, ftg/g DW plant .
' uglmL soil water
,/ig/g DWplant^
Vg/g soil
,lMglg DW plant \
Uglg soil
,Hg/g DW plant -.
fig/g soil
Brgrain
(Mg/g DW plant ^
fj.g/g soil
(//g/g DW plant ^
pg/g air
Brroarieg value was obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sioreen, and Shor (1984). Br
values for nonyegetative growth (such as tubers) hi Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and
Shor (1984) were used for Brrooneg.
Brag value for fruits was obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984).
Br values for nonvegetative growth (reproductive) in Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and
Shor (1984) were used for Br^ (fruits). Br^ value for vegetables was calculated
using data obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984). Br values for
nonvegetative (reproductive) growth and,Bv values for vegetative growth
weighted as 75% (reproductive) and 25% vegetative (Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and
Shor [1984])-^were used for Br^ (vegetables).
The weighted average Br^ value for aboveground produce was obtained as
follows: (1) Bra values for fruits combined with a human consumption rate of
fruits of 1.44E-03 kg/kg/day, and (2) Bra, values for vegetables combined with a
human consumption rate of vegetables of 1.49E-03 kg/kg/day.
Brf>rage value was obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984). Bv
values for vegetative growth (such as leaves and stems) in Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen,
and Shor (1 984) were used for Brforage.
Brerain value was obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984). Br
values for nonvegetative growth as recommended by Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and
Shor (1 984) were used for Br^^,
Metals are assumed to not experience air-to-leaf transfer, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b).
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-8
B-3-8
B-2-8
MD
4.50E-03
4.88E-03
7.50E-03
4.50E-03
NA
A-3-223
-------
TABLE A-3-52
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CHROMIUM (7440-47-3)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter | Reference and Explanation
Biotransfer Factors for Plants (Continued)
Bvfi^,
.yg/g DWplant^
Uglg air
Metals are assumed to not experience air-to-leaf transfer, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b).
Equations
."• •.-.'•'--Vahie"- •'•"
B-3-8
NA
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
&*„« (day/kg FW)
Ba^f (day/kg FW)
Ba^t (day/kg FW)
Ba^, (day/kg FW)
BaMfia, (day/kg FW)
5C/rM.
(L/kgFW tissue)
AtFjMOL/kgFW)
BSAFfrs (unitless)
Baaat values were obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984) for all
metals, except cadmium, mercury, selenium, and zinc.
UflW values were obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984) for all
metals, except cadmium, mercury, selenium, and zinc.
—
—
Geometric mean value obtained from Thompson, Burton, Quinn, and Ng (1972)
for freshwater and marine fish.
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
1.5E-03
5.5E-03
ND
ND
ND
2.83E+02
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
/5/D (mg/kg/day)
Ora/CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
#C (mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/mJ)-'
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)
RjD value cited in U.S. EPA (1995c) for Chromium (IE).
-
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
l.OE+00
ND
3.5E+00
ND
ND
Note:
AH parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-224
-------
TABLE A-3-53
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM (18540-29-9)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation • ' , ,
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties
MT(g/mole)
r.<"K)
Vp (atm)
S(mg/L)
Jf(atm-m3/mol)
Da (cm2/s)
Z>w(cm2/s)
X^ (imitless)
^(mL/g)
A4(mL/g)
JG4,(L/Kg)
AiMmL/g)
fog- (year)'1
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
All metals, except mercury, are assumed to be nonvolatile at ambient
temperatures.
All metals, except mercury, are assumed to be insoluble in water.
/f value is assumed to be zero, because the Vp and S values are zero for all
metals, except mercury.
Da value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Dw value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
-
' '
Kds value was obtained from U.S. EPA (1996a), which provides pH-based
values that were estimated by using the MINTEQ2 geochemical speciation
model.
Kd^ value is assumed to be same as the Kd, value, because organic carbon does
not play a major role in sorption for the metals, as cited in U.S. EPA (1994f).
Kdbs value is assumed to be same as the Kd, value, because organic carbon does
not play a major role in sorption for the metals, as cited in U.S. EPA (1994f).
- " ' . '
-
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
—
'-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18;
B-4-24
B-4-16;
B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
Value
52
2,173.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.36E-01
1.58E-05
NA
NA
31atpH=4.9;
19atpH=6.8;
14atpH=8.0
31atpH=4.9;
19atpH=6.8;
14atpH=8.0
31atpH=4.9;
19 at pH=6.8;
14atpH=8.0
ND
A-3-225
-------
TABLE A-3-53
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM (18540-29-9)
(Page 2 of 3)
Pflrftmctcr
Fv (unitless)
RCF
, l*g/g DW plant .
' uglmL soil water
BfnetKg
^iglg DW plant j
Uglg soil
*W
^glg DWplant^
Hg/g soil
Br^
^g/g DWplant^
Hg/g soil
Br^
>Hgfg DWplant^
(iglg soil
*W
.Uglg DW plant j
Uglg air
BVf^t,
.Uglg DWplant^
pglg air
Reference and Explanation *
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Because they are nonvolatile, metals are assumed to be 100 percent in
particulate phase and zero percent in the vapor phase, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994f).
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
™~
Brno**, value was obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sioreen, and Shor (1984). Br
values for nonvegetative growth (such as tubers) in Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and
Shor (1984) were used for Br^,,^
Br value for fruits was obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984).
Br values for nonvegetative growth (reproductive) in Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and
Shor (1984) were used for Br.g (fruits). Br^ value for vegetables was calculated
using data obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984). Br values for
nonvegetative (reproductive) growth and5v values for vegetative growth
weighted as 75% (reproductive) and 25% vegetative (Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and
Shor [1984])— were used for Br^ (vegetables).
The weighted average Brag value for aboveground produce was obtained as
follows: (1) Brag values for fruits combined with a human consumption rate of
fruits of 1.44E-03 kg/kg/day, and (2) Brail values for vegetables combined with a
human consumption rate of vegetables of 1.49E-03 kg/kg/day.
Brfn- value was obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984). By
values for vegetative growth (such as leaves and stems) hi Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen,
and Shor (1984) were used for Brfwage.
Br^, value was obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984). Br
values for nonvegetative growth as recommended by Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and
Shor (1984) were used for Br^.
Metals are assumed to not experience air-to-leaf transfer, as cited in
U.S.EPA(1995b).
Metals are assumed to not experience air-to-leaf transfer, as cited in
U.S.EPA(1995b).
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-8
B-3-8
B-2-8
B-3-8
';>" v Vatae ."•••'' J
0.000000
ND
4.50E-03
4.88E-03
7.50E-03
4.50E-03
NA
NA
A-3-226
-------
TABLE A-3-53
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM (18540-29-9)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation • • > •> ' I Equations "
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Eamm (day/kg FW)
fiaw(day/kgFW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Baege (day/kg FW)
flflctete, (day/kg FW)
£CF^
(L/kgFW tissue)
&4F^(L/kgFW)
BSAFfrk (unitless)
Bami,t values were obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984) for all
metals, except cadmium, mercury, selenium, and zinc.
Ba^er values were obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984) for all
metals, except cadmium, mercury, selenium, and zinc.
' • • '
- ' •
-
BCF values were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995b) for all metals, except lead
and mercury.
~
-
Health Benchmarks
RJD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
J?/C (mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
RfD value cited in U.S. EPA (1997b) for Chromium (VI).
Calculated based on Inhalation URF using inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a
human body weight of 70 kg.
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
Inhalation URF value cited in U.S. EPA (1997b) for Chromium (VI).
Inhalation CSF value cited hi U.S. EPA (1997c) for Chromium (VI).
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
Value
1.5E-03
5.5E-03
ND
ND
ND
3.0E+00
NA
NA
5.0E-03
4.1E+01
1.8E-02
1.2E-02
4.1E+01
Note:
All parameters are defined hi list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-227
-------
TABLE A-3-54
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CHRYSENE (218-01-9)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MF(g/mole)
r«(K)
f£(atm)
S(mg/L)
//(atnvmVmol)
jD.(cmVs)
A»(cmVs)
K^, (unitless)
X«(mL/g)
Kdt (mL/g)
Xi/w(L/Kg)
/&/fa (mL/g)
Reference and Explanation :;- : • :- v7: -
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckehuan (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1 994c).
H value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, SandVp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database U.S. EPA (1994d).
A, value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database U.S. EPA (1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
XL. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for phthalates
and PAHs, cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). K^ value was calculated by using the
recommended K^ value that is provided hi this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kdy
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the XL. value that is provided in
this table.
Kd^, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon hi suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the X^ value that is provided in this table.
Kdg value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the KK value that is provided in this table.
' •• Equations '•*
:-;:n^vaJne-*':'
—
—
~
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
228.28
527.1
1.03E-11
at25°C
(solid)
1.94E-03
1.21E-06
2.48E-02
6.21E-06
5.48E+05
2.97E+05
2.97E+03
2.23E+04
1.19E404
A-3-228
-------
TABLE A-3-54
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CHRYSENE (218-01-9)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Fv(unitless)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using S, Tm and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
Equations
Value
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
2.53E-01
0.761276
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, uglg DW plant .
^ UglmL soil water'
,fj,glg DW plant \
Uglg soil
,H-glg DW plant-.
pglg soil
Brforage
(Mg/g DW plant )
Uglg soil
,IMglg DW plant ^
/j-g/g air
^glg DW plant )
t^glg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroolv value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table.
Bra, value was calculated by using the correlation equation withX^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
Br&roge value was calculated by using the correlation equation withX^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided in this table.
Bvf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and //that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, 'and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
6.10E+03
2.05E+00
1.866E-02
1.866E-02
5.97E+04
5.97E+04
A-3-229
-------
TABLE A-3-54
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CHRYSENE (218-01-9)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Baw (day/kg FW)
BOf^ (day/kg FW)
flo,^, (day/kg FW)
Bfl.teu* (day/kg FW)
(L/kgFW tissue)
&4FjW(Ij'kgFW)
BSAF^ (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
2?amjft value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
B0b«f value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided hi this table.
Ba ' t value was calculated by using thethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Bo,.., value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, that is cited hi
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^, value
that is provided in this table.
•ZtodifaUn value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Babf^ value.
-
BAFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value above 4.0, as cited hi U.S. EPA
(1995b). BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying a food chain
multiplier (FCM) with a geometric mean of various laboratory measured BCFs
obtained from various experimental studies cited hi U.S. EPA (1998). FCMs were
obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc) — See Appendix A-3.
-
Equations
ValnevVv
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
4.355E-03
1.377E-02
1.67E-02
4.35E+00
1.09E-02
NA
6.03E+03
NA
Health Benchmarks
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Orat CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
/yC(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
fcg/m3)-'
Inhalation CSF
(mgflcg/dayy1
-
Calculated by multiplying the Oral CSF for Benzo(a)pyrene by the relative potency
factor for chrysene of 0.001 (U.S.EPA 1993e)
-
Calculated from Oral CSF using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
Value based on Oral CSF assuming route-to-route extrapolation.
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
ND
7.3E-03
ND
2.1E-06
ND
Note:
NA « Not applicable
ND " No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-230
-------
TABLE A-3-55
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR M-CRESOL (108-39-4)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
• ' Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MW (g/mole)
r»(K)
Vp(atm)
5(mg/L)
/^(atm'mVmol)
A,(cm2/s)
Av(cm2/s)
AT^, (unitless)
^(mL/g)
MCcmVg)
^(L/Kg)
fiUcm'/g)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Rvalue cited in U.S. EPA (1995b). 'T .'
5 value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the Afl¥, S, and" Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
. A, value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1 994d).
Km value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b)
Koc, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans, cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). KO,. value was calculated by using the recommended Km value
that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation withX^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table. ' •
Kd.,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K,c that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value '
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kdfc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
-
. - .
-
"--
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
'--
__
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11.
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
108.13
. 284.1
1.90E-04
at25°C
(liquid)
2.30E+04
8.93E-07
6.93E-02
9.30E-06
9.10E+01
4.78E+01
4.78E-01
3.58E+00
1.91E+00
A-3-231
-------
TABLE A-3-55
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR M-CRESOL (108-39-4)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
ksg(ytary*
Fv(unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited hi Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited hi Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
^ Equations
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8;B-4-l;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Value
8.72E+00
0.999997
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, (iglg DW plant ,
" pgtmL soil water'
Brn^t
,yg/g DW plant.
pglg soil
AW
.Uglg DW plant.
ftg/g soil
*>W
^gfg DWplant^
pg/g soil
*>«
^ftg/g DTP plant.
Pglg air
S>W
^glgDW plant j
Hg/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Br^tHf value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table.
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with £„, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Br£K°s< vauie w38 calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
Bv^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA^ and H that is
cited hi Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and K^f values that are provided in this table.
BVf,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
citedin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, andvighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.38E+01
2.89E+01
2.86E+00
2.86E+00
7.64E+00
7.64E+00
A-3-232
-------
TABLE A-3-55
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FORM-CRESOL (108-39-4)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference anil Explanation
Equations
Value >
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Baam (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Bapork (day/kg FW)
Baesg (day/kg FW)
jBflrf.tete, (day/kg FW)
£CF^
(L/kgFW tissue)
A*Fj»(L/kgFW)
BSAFfcH (unitless)
5am,,t value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Babee[ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A"^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^,
value that is provided in this table.
Bfpork value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba,^ value.
Baeg, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table. .-..'"'
BacMcha, value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba,^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in ' •
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation with A^,
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
- - ' . - . . . • , . . .
. .
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
7.23E-07
2.29E-06
2.77E-06
7.23E-04
1.86E-06
1.81E+01
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
#C (mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(MS/m3)'1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1 ,
U.S. EPA (1997b)
.- . •, '
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
- '
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
5.00E-02
ND
1.8E+00
ND
ND
Note: ,
NA= Not applicable ,
ND= No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-233
-------
TABLE A-3-56
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR O-CRESOL (95-48-7)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter I Reference and Explanation
Equations. I 'Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
rm(K)
Vp(&tm)
5(rag/L)
#(atm-mVmol)
A,(cmVs)
A»(cmJ/s)
K^, (unitless)
^(mL/g)
*4(cmVg)
tf4»(L/Kg)
A'<4,(ctnVg)
Budavari, O'Neill, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neill, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
H value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
D. value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
£>„ value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
K^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). KK value was calculated by using the recommended Km value
that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Kac value that is provided in
this table.
Kd,^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with KOI. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the K^. value that is provided in this table.
Kdjp value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdts value was calculated by using the
KB, value that is provided in this table.
-
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
~~
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
108.13
303.1
4.16E-04
at25°C
(solid)
2.77E-K)4
1.62E-06
6.88E-02
9.41E-06
1.05E402
5.34E+01
5.34E-01
4.0E+00
2.14E+00
A-3-234
-------
TABLE A-3-56
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR O-CRESOL (95-48-7)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter I ' > Reference and Explanation ,
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Fv(unitless)
RCF
, ftg/g DW plant .
* i^gltnL soil water'
^g/g DW plant ^
tJ-g/g soil
(Pgls DW plant ,
pglg soil
Brf,rage •
flJ-glg DW plant \
pg/g soil
*W
fizgig DW plant.
Uglg air
BVf^lgDW plant.
/j.g/g air
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using S, Tm, and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Value
3.61E+01
0.999999
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with AT^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
BrrooKeg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table.
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with JiT that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^, value that
is provided in this table.
Br^ag,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided in this
table.
BVforfgf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, and .ffthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor oflOO,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and K^, values that are provided in this
table. ,
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.47E+01
2.75E+01
2.63E+00
2.63E+00
4.89E+00
4.89E+00
A-3-235
-------
TABLE A-3-56
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR O-CRESOL (95-48-7)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
. . ' Reference and Explanation -';v:":"v;v ;;,;:/.. :>^"'v ;V' ;-;•
Equations
;, Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
5ow (day/kg FW)
Ba^t (day/kg FW)
Jfcr^Cday/kgFW)
£«Ud«, (day/kg FW)
SCRm
(Ukg, FW tissue)
A4FM(L/kgFW)
BSM/^ri (unitless)
Bamllk value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba!xtf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the KM
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^f. value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba,^ value.
Batt, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Caluomia EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
Ba^ua, value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1 995b). BCFf,,, value calculated using the correlation equation with Km
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
-
- '
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
8.34E-07
2.64E-06
3.19E-06
8.34E-04
2.08E-06
2.02E+01
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
SJD (mg/kg/day)
Oa/CSF
(rag/kg/day)-1
/yC(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
0/gto3)-'
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
- ' .
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 m'/day and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
-
_ . '
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
5.00E-02
ND
1.80E-01
ND
ND
Note:
NA™ Not applicable
ND" No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-236
-------
TABLE A-3-57
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR P-CRESOL (106-44-5)
(Page 1 of 3)
* ' Parameter
MF(g/mole)
rm(K)
Vp(atm)
5(mg/L)
H (atm-m'/mol)
A,(cm2/s)
£Ucm2/s)
KM, (unitless)
^c(mL/g)
J&UcmVg)
J&L(L/Kg)
ATdUcmVg)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
.//value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Km value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans, cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). Koc value was calculated by using the recommended Km value
that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kof that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate &4
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Kac value that is provided in
this table.
KtL, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon m suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdn value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
KtLs value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the K^. value that is provided in this table.
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-. - : .
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
108.13
308.6
1.70E-04
at25°C
(solid)
2.30E+04
7.99E-07
6.93E-02
9.30E-06
8.70E+01
4.61E401
4.61E-01
3.46E+00
1.84E+00
A-3-237
-------
TABLE A-3-57
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR P-CRESOL (106-44-5)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
lag (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited hi Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited hi Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that
are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a liquid
phase value before being used hi the calculations.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3:2;B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
3.79E+02
0.999997
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
ACF
. uglg DW plant ,
* ttg/mL soil water'
^Uglg DW plant ^
Uglg soil
fttg/g DW plant ^
Uglg soil
**>«•.
^glg DWpIant^
Uglg soil
,Hglg DWplant^
pglg air
*Hglg DW plant-. '
ffg/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided hi this table. The value was then .converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Br , value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in mis table.
Br™ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided hi this table.
IfrVp,- value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in 'Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KV, value that is provided hi this table.
Bva, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KW values that are provided in this table.
Bvf*?s? va^ue was calculated by using the correlation equation with KM and /f that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KW values that are provided in mis table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.35E+01
2.94E+01
2.93E+00
2.93E+00
8.13E+00
8.13E+00
A-3-238
-------
TABLE A-3-57
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR P-CRESOL (106-44-5)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
. Reference and Explanation
Equations
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamllt (day/kg FW)
Ba^ef (day/kg FW)
&V* (day/kg FW)
Baegg (day/kg FW)
5ac»fctm (day/kg FW)
*CFj»
(L/kg FW tissue)
JMFjMCMcgFW)
5&iF^ft (unitless)
5am,/t value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
5afe?f value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
BUpork value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Ba ™, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
Bachicia, value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Babe^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation witb.^
obtained from Veilh, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980)— See Appendix A-3.
-
•-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
- ' Vaiofe^
6.91E-07
2.19E-06
2.65E-06
6.91E-04
1.73E-06
1.75E+01
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RJD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
.R/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)'1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
U.S. EPA (1997c)
-
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
5.00E-03
ND
1.80E-02
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-239
-------
TABLE A-3-58
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CUMENE (ISOPROPYLBENZENE) (98-82-8)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MF(g/mole)
rm(K)
Vp(atia)
S(mg/L)
#(atnvmVmol)
A,(cmVs)
Dw(cmz/s)
JsTw(uniUess)
tf«(mL/g)
Jfo/,(«nVg)
JQkO/Kg)
AT<4,(cmVg)
Reference and Explanation 1 Equaflom
•f; ;VaiueV:-,.
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
U.S. EPA (1995b)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
5 value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
H value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl,
and Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was
calculated by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
DB value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dv value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
K^ value cited to U.S. EPA (1995b)
Kx value was calculated by using the correlation equation with-K^ for
phthalates and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs,
dioxins, and furans, cited hi U.S. EPA (1994c). Koc value was calculated by
using the recommended K^ value that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil.
Measured organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to
calculate Kd., because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic
carbon in soil. Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the KK value
that is provided in this table.
Kd,* value was calculated by using the correlation equation with fL, that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in
suspended sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific
to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value vanes,
depending on the fraction of organic carbon hi suspended sediment.
Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided
in this table.
Kdi, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon hi bottom sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending
on the fraction of organic carbon hi bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value
was calculated by using the KK value that is provided in this table.
-
-
t
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
~™
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-3-3; B-3-4;
B-3-5; B-3-6;
B-4-3; B-4-4;
B-4-5; B-4-6;
B-4-10;B-4-ll
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
120.19
177
6.00E-03
at25°C
(liquid)
5.60E+01
1.29E-02
6.50E-02
7.83E-06
4.10E+03
9.31E+03
9.31E+01
6.98E+02
3.72E+02
A-3-240
-------
TABLE A-3-58
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CUMENE (ISOPROPYLBENZENE) (98-82-8)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter,
ksg (year)J
Fv (unitless)
RCF
, pgfg DW plant .
fig/mL soil water
"^rootveg
,Hglg DW plant.
pglg soil
,Hglg DW plant.
Uglg soil
/Mils DW plant.
Hg/g soil
,l*glg DW plant.
fj.g/g air
^forage
fizgig DW plant^
Hg/g air
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value ?
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in
Howard, Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977).
Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided
in the table.
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight
basis by using a moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroone, value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value
provided in this table.
Sr value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the KW value that is provided in this table.
Brforagf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the KM value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, and H that
is cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira,
Gaggi, Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a
factor of 100. No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce
and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C,
by using the Hand K^ values that are provided in this table.
Bvflr<,ge value was calculated by using the correlation equation with/s^ and H
that is cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira,
Gaggi, Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a
factor of 100. No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce
and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C,
by using the H and Km values that are provided in this table.
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-1; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
3.16E-KU
0.999998
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.47E+02
1.58E400
3.16E-01
3.16E-01
3.06E-02
3.06E-02
A-3-241
-------
TABLE A-3-58
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CUMENE (ISOPROPYLBENZENE) (98-82-8)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
5o^(day/kgFW)
Ba^t (day/kg FW)
J5aw(day/kgFW)
5oe*fcto,(day^gFW)
fiCFjw
(UkgFW tissue)
JMFjwOAgFW)
SS^jj (unitless)
.. , ".--.:' Reference and Explanation a;; >•••:' ';•.";.'- '-V.y
Equations ] : 'Value \
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
5a^t value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using
the KM, value that is provided in this table.
Ba-bf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using
the KM value that is provided in this table.
£
-------
TABLE A-3-59
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CYANIDE (57-12-5)
(Page 1 of 3)
IpikfavnQ'^gi*
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
r«(K)
Vp(ati&)
5(mg/L)
//(atm-mVmol)
A,(cm2/s)
A,(cnrVs)
KM, (unitless)
^(mL/g)
JSaUonVg)
Ait, (I/Kg)
AJMcmVg)
fog (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
U.S.EPA (1992a)
' '
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
• .
• -
£>„ value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d)
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d)
—
—
-
~
Ksg value was assumed to be zero due to a lack of data.
Fv value was assumed to be 1.0 due to a lack of data.
Equations
-
'
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
"
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Value
26.017
ND
1.82E-02
at25°C
(solid)
ND
ND
5.48E-01
2.10E-05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0
1.000000
A-3.-243
-------
TABLE A-3-59
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CYANIDE (57-12-5)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter | Reference and Explanation
RCF
, pglgDW plant ,
*Hg/mL soil water'
BrHeMt
,l*glg DW plant.
pgfg soil
Br«
,l*glg DW plant.
Vg/g soil
Br^
^glgDW plant.
pg/g soil
*W
,fig/g DW plant.
Pglg air
BVfref.
,Ug/g DW plant.
Hg/g air
Equations ; •
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamtk (day/kg FW)
Ba^dny/kgPW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
flow (day/kg FW)
^dadUntday/kgFW)
;L/kgFW tissue)
atf^CLAgFW)
-
-
-
-
-
BCF values were geometric mean laboratory or field derived values obtained from
various literature sources cited in U.S. EPA (1998) — see Appendix A-3.
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
6.33E+02
ND
A-3-244
-------
TABLE A-3-59
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR CYANIDE (57-12-5)
(Page 3 of 3)
*!>« »•*» *M t^ixw
BSAFf,h (unitless)
RJD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
RfC (mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(me/kg/day)-'
Reference and Explanation • '
Health Benchmarks (Continued)
—
U.S. EPA (1997b)
_
Calculated from Rfl) using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
-
-
Equations
B-4-28
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
.Value
NA
2.0E-02
ND
7.0E-02
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-245
-------
TABLE A-3-60
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 4,4'-DDD (72-54-8)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Valu
Chemical/Physical Properties
MK(g/mole)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
320.05
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
380.1
Pp(atm)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
1.14E-09
at25°C
(solid)
•S(mg/L)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
7.33E-02
//(atnvmVmol)
/Tvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
4.98E-06
>. (cma/s)
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
1.69E-02
Devalue was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
B-4-20
4.76E-06
AT«(unitless)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
1.32E+06
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
4.58E+04
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 m soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil. *
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
4.58E402
-, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0 that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to she
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdm because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd value
was calculated by using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
3.44E+03
J&UcmVg)
Rf«L value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K.. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 hi bottom
sediment Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdt,, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
B-4-16; B-4-25
1.83E+03
A-3-246
-------
TABLE A-3-60
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 4,4'-DDD (72-54-8)
(Page 2 of 3)
•-, '"'- -'r'.!,jp||i*j|tii|5tiy
, - Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman .
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that
are provided in this table. Vp value for this comppund was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
_
Equations I Value
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, fj.glg DW plant -
' pglmL soil water
Brrootveg
^glgDW plant ^
fig/g soil
Bras
,fj.g/g DWplant^
Uglg soil
Bfforage
^g/g DWplant^
pglg soil
Bvag
,Hglg DWplant^
pg/g air
BVf,rage .
^glg DWplant^
pg/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroof>eg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table.
Brax value was calculated by using the correlation equation with :Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboyeground
produce. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table.
Br^..,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
iriTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for .
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Rvalue that is provided in this table.
Bv value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided in this table.
Bvfor e value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that- is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was. calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
4.34E-02
0.925394
1.20E-H)4
2.62E+01
1.12E-02
1.12E-02
3.70E+04
3.70E+04
A-3-247
-------
TABLE A-3-60
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 4,4'-DDD (72-54-8)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Jtow(day/kgFW)
Ba,^ (day/kg FW)
Bam (day/kg FW)
^Ufcte, (day/kg FW)
BCF^
(Ukg, FW tissue)
A4F^(L/kgFW)
BSAFju, (unitless)
/?/Z> (mg/kg/day)
OralCSF
[mg/kg/day)4
J?/C(mg/mJ)
Inhalation URF
fcgAn3)-'
'nhalation CSF
(mgflcg/day)-'
: ..''.- Reference and Explanation
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Bai^f value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^f. value was calculated by using the fet content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
5a value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
-B^Mtota value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Bab^f value.
-
BAFs were used for compounds with a log KM value above 4.0, as cited in U.S. EPA
(1995b). BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying a food chain
multiplier (FCM) with an estimated BCF. BCFs were estimated using the
correlation equation obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980).
FCMs were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc)-^See Appendix A-3.
-
Equations I Value
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26 .
B-4-27
B-4-28
1.05E-02
3.31E-02
4.01E-02
1.05E+01
2.62E-02
NA
5.25E+05
NA
Health Benchmarks
-
U.S.EPA (1997b)
-
Calculated from Oral CSF using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
Value based on Oral CSF assuming route-to-route extrapolation.
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
ND
2.40E-01
ND
6.90E-05
2.40E-01
Note:
NA - Not applicable
ND - No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3^248
-------
TABLE A-3-61
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 4,4'-DDE (72-55-9)
(Page 1 of 3)
.--. v-::; Parameter
° '* Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
rm(K)
Vp (atm)
5(mg/L)
H (atm-mVmol)
A,(cm2/s) \
£>w(cm2/s)
AT^, (unitless)
^(mL/g)
Kds(cm3/g)
M»(L/Kg)
/^(cm3/g)
Montgomery and Welkom( 1991)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). .
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, 5, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
£>„ value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA I994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S, EPA (1996b).
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Kac value that is provided in
this table. ,
.KiL, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate KdM because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^, value
was calculated by using the K,, value that is provided in this table. • , •
Kdfc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Equations
.-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8;B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21 '
B-4-20
-
--'
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4;B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
Value
319.03
361.1
7.45E-09
at25°C
(solid)
1.92E-02
1.24E-04
1.70E-02
4.78E-06
1.80E+06
8.64E+02
8.64E+06
6.48E+03
3.46E+03
A-3-249
-------
TABLE A-3-61
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 4,4'-DDE (72-55-9)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
RCF
„ uglg DW plant ,
* HgfmL soil water'
Brmr*g
,l*g/g DW plant*
Uglg soil
*r«
.ftgtg DW plant \
Uglg soil
Br^
^g/g DW plant j
pglg soil
*W
^glg DW plant j
(2g/g air
*W
^glgDW plant j
Hg/g air
Reference and Explaiiation : 5 -..••..' ';';" :•<';* "Vv*
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that
are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Brn?tttg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table.
Erttg value was calculated by using the correlation equation with.^ that is cited in
Travis and Anns (1988). No distinction was made between values for abovegroun
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Brg.^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM, value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided in mis table.
Bvforagf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, and H that is
citedin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); ana Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vigm (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided in this table.
•--'';'• : S:'-;W~
^ Eqwations'^
B-l-2; B-2-2;-
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8;B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
i^liieS
4.34E-02
0.981338
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.53E+04
1.77E+01
9.37E-03
9.37E-03
2.08E+03
2,08E+03
A-3-250
-------
TABLE A-3-61
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 4,4'-DDE (72-55-9)
(Page 3 of 3)
N ,
Parameter
, . „ Reference «nil Explanation * *
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Eamm (day/kg FW)
fla^day/kgFW)
B0pork (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
-BarfMto, (day/kg FW)
*CF*i
(L/kg, FW tissue)
AU^OAgFW)
BSAFf,h (unitless)
Bamm value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
1)0^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the KM
value that is provided in this table.
Bapork value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/1 9) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
jBa-j* value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Camornia EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
BcteuetB, value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba,^ value.
-
BAFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value above 4.0, as cited in U.S. EPA
(1995b). BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying a food chain
multiplier (FCM) with a geometric mean of various laboratory measured BCFs
obtained from various experimental studies cited in U.S. EPA (1998). FCM& were
obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc) — See Appendix A-3.
-
Equations '•
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Value
1.43E-02
4.53E-02
5.49E-02
1.43E401
3.58E-02
NA
5.53E+05
NA
Health Benchmarks
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
*/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-'
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
_ . - .
U.S.EPA(1997b)
- . .
Calculated from the Oral CSF using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human
body weight of 70 kg.
Value based on Oral CSF assuming route-to-route extrapolation.
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
ND
3.40E-01
ND
9.7E-05
3.40E-01
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-251
-------
TABLE A-3-62
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 4,4'-DDT (50-29-3)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation : /
Equations
i Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
r.CK)
¥p(atm)
S(mg/L)
//(atnvmVmol)
D.(cinVs)
Z>w(crna/s)
A'w (unitless)
/^(mL/g)
A-iUcmVg)
&/w(L/Kg)
A'4,(cmVg)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).. '
//value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
De value was obtaine.d from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d)..
£>„, value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S< EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd' value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kaf that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kda
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in
this table.'
Kd.y, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koq that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the, value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the KM value that is provided in this table.
Kdip value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom '
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdb3, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the K^ value that is provided in this table.
-
—
--' .
B-l-6;B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
;
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
Br4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
354.49 .
381.1
5.17E-10
at25°C
(solid)
3.41E-03
5.37E-05
1.48E-02
4.48E-06
1.17E+06
6.78E+05
6.78E+03
5.08E+04
2.71E+04
A-3-252
-------
TABLE A-3-62
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 4,4'-DDT (50-29-3)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter V,-'.
fog (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
RCF
, uglg DW plant .
' Hg/mL soil water'
,/j.g/g DW plant)
Uglg soil
,Hglg DW plant \
Uglg soil
ffj-glg DW plant.
Hg/g soil
fl^g/g DW plant.
fj,glg air
,Hglg DW plant.
pglg air
Reference and Explanation „ , - !."., ••;/-.,
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values tiiat
are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the jK™ value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Brrc0f,,g value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in uiis table.
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K value that
is provided in this table.
Br&tv> value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM, value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this Value by a factor of 100)
No distinction was made between values for above ground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km, values that are provided in this table.
BVforagf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with .ST and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
1, Equations
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
Value '
4.34E-02
0.851957
1.10E+04
1.62E+00
1.20E-02
1.20E-02
3.03E+03
3.03E+03
A-3-253
-------
TABLE A-3-62
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 4,4'-DDT (50-29-3)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Boi^-(day/kgFW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Bam (day/kg FW)
.fcUfcta (day/kg FW)
SCFW
(L/kg,FW tissue)
Atl^MOUkgFW)
&£4/^,A (unities^)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^ik value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table. ,
Bai*
-------
TABLE A-3-63
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE (84-74-2)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter »•.
,MF(g/mole)
r«(K)
f>(atm)
5(mg/L)
/f(atm-m3/mol)
A,(cm2/s)
rUcm'/s)
KM, (unitless)
^(mL/g)
^4(cm3/g)
fik(L/Kg)
«4 (cmVg)
fog (year)'1
Reference and Explanation
• Equations
lvValue:vf
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neill, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
/Tvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from WATERS model database (U.S. EPA 1995d).
Dw value was obtained from WATERS model database (U.S. EPA 1995d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0( that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Kac value that is provided in
this table.
AiL, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in this table.
-•Kdi, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kac that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kdhs, because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by using the
Kac value that is provided in this table.
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited hi Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
-
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
278.34
238.1
5.55E-08
at25°C
(liquid)
1.08E+01
1.43E-06
4.38E-02
7.86E-06
5.25E+04
1.57E+03
1.57E+01
1.18E+02
6.27E+01
1.11E+01
A-3-255
-------
TABLE A-3-63
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE (84-74-2)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation ?• -••'•• .'•;' :-'-". t°;
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Fv (unitless)
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided hi this table.
-^ -Equations/-^
•t?...Yal«eVr;
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
0.989393
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, uglg DW plant .
* UglmL soil water'
BfHtntt
.Uglg DW plant.
vste soil
*«
,Hglg DW plant >
fjg/g soil
Br^
.yglg DW plant ^
Hgtg soil
*W
.pglg DW plant^
Uglg air
*W
^tglg DWplant^
pglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation withX^, that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided hi this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Brrqoettg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in ttuslable (see section A3.4.2 of Appendix A-3).
Br value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided hi this table.
Ere,--, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Kw value that is provided in this table.
Bva. value was calculated by using the correlation equation, with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the //and K^, values that are provided in this
table.
Even,,* value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and Hthat is
citedin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the Hand K^, values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.01E+03
6.43E+01
7.24E-02
7.24E-02
4.16E+03
4.16E+03
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
£«„« (day/kg FW)
5aw(day/kgFW)
Bamllk value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided hi this table.
Ba^tf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
B-3-1 1
B-3-10
4.17E-04
1.32E-03
A-3-256
-------
TABLE A-3-63
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE (84-74-2)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation . "j -
Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals (Continued)
B0pork (day/kg FW)
Baegg (day/kg FW)
•Bflcwdto, (day/kg FW)
tfCFjs,*
(L/kg FW tissue)
JBMFjMtL/kgFW)
BSAFf,h (unitless) ..
Sa-ort value was calculated by using thethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A3.4.2 of Appendix A-3).
Ba,g- value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^, value
that is provided in this table.
J3acWctol value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba,^ value (see section A3.4.3 of Appendix A-3).
~ "
BAFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value above 4.0, as cited in U.S. EPA
(1995b). BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying a food chain
multiplier (FCM) with an estimated BCF. BCFs were estimated using the
correlation equation obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980).
FCMs were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc) — See Appendix A-3.
-
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
1.60E-03
4.17E-01
1.04E-03
NA
5.58E+03
NA
Health Benchmarks
RfD (mg/kg/day)
OralCSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
5/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
G"g/m3)-'
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 m3/day and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
l.OOE-01
ND
3.50E-01
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-257
-------
TABLE A-3-64
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FORDI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE (117-84-0)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
A0K(g/mole)
r«(K)
Fp(atia)
5(mg/L)
/r(atm-m3/mol)
D. (cmVs)
A,(cmVs)
#„, (unitless)
ATM(mL/g)
«4(cmVg)
JfikCLflCg)
&4,(cm3/g)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
fTvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
KM value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for phthalates
and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans,
cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). K^ value was calculated by using the recommended Km
value that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kof that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd,,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Km value that is provided in
this table.
Kd.y, value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA",,, that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^, value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kdjy value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kd,^ because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
-
-
—
--
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
~~
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
x--%uie:v?:
390.56
248.1
5.90E-09
at25°C
(liquid)
3.00E+00
7.68E-07
1.32E-02
4.20E-06
2.14E+09
9.03E+08
9.03E406
6.78E+07
3.61E+07
A-3-258
-------
TABLE A-3-64
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FORDI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE (117-84-0)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
, , Reference and Explanation " ' >
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg(year)~l
Fv (unitless)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991)
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, /J,g/g DW plant .
*fj.g/mL soil water
"rrootvcg
,Vglg DW plant \
/j.g/g soil
Brag
,IJ.glg DWplant^
Uglg soil
Brforage
(ftg/S DWplant^
V-glg soil
Bvag
,/j.g/g DW plant ,
fj.g/g air
Bvforase
,/ig/g DW plant.
fj,g/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with J^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroofleg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table.
.Br value was calculated by using the correlation equation with ^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
Br^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM, value that is provided in this table.
Bv value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KW values that are provided in this table.
Bvf .e value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
Value
9.03E+00
1.000000
3.55E+06
3.93E-01
1.57E-04
1.57E-04
6.28E+08
6.28E408
A-3-259
-------
TABLE A-3-64
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR DI-N-OCTYLPHTHALATE (117-84-0)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
fla^day/kgFW)
J?aw(day/kgFW)
Ba^t (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
^aafcte, (day/kg FW)
(Ukg FW tissue)
^(/•^(L/kgFW)
BSAFju, (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamtllc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Batcf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^j. value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Jto value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
^eftfcto, value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Babaf value.
—
BAFs were used for compounds with a log Km value above 4.0, as cited in U.S. EPA
(1995b). BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying a food chain
multiplier (FCM) with a geometric mean of various laboratory measured BCFs
obtained from various experimental studies cited in U.S. EPA (1998). FCMs were
obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc)— See Appendix A-3.
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
1.70E+01
5.37E401
6.50E+01
1.70E+04
4.24E-H)!
NA
3.88E+03
NA
Health Benchmarks
/5/D (mg/kg/day)
OralCSF
(mg/kg/dmy)"1
jyC (mg/m3)
Mtalation URF
Oig/m1)'1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-'
U.S.EPA (1997a)
-
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 m3/day and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
2.00E-02
ND
7.00E-02
ND
ND
Note:
NA» Not applicable
ND m No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-260
-------
TABLE A-3-65
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR DIAZINON (333-41-5)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MT(g/mole)
Tm(K)
Vp (atm)
S(mg/L)
/r(atm-m3/mol)
Da(cm2/s)
A,(cm2/s)
.£„„, (unitless)
^(mL/g)
Kds(cm3/g)
&L(L/Kg)
^4s(cmVg)
< , Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Howard (1989-1993)
Vp value cited in Howard (1989-1993).
5 value cited in Howard (1989-1993).
# value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl,
and Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was
calculated by using the MW, 5, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Devalue was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
£>„ value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoflf and Long (1995).
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for
phthalates and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs,
dioxins, and fiirans, cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). Koc value was calculated by
using the recommended K^ value that is provided in this table.
Kds value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil.
Measured organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to
calculate Kds, because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic
carbon in soil. Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the KM value
that is provided in this table.
Kdn value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in
suspended sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific
to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies,
depending on the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment.
Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by using the Kx value that is provided
in this table.
Kdbs value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending
on the fraction of organic carbon in bottom sediment Recommended Kdbs value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
-
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
~~
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-3-3; B-3-4;
B-3-5; B-3-6;
B-4-3; B-4-4;
B-4-5; B-4-6;
B-4-10;B-4-ll
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
304.36
393.1
1.11E-07
at25°C
(solid)
6.88E+01
4.89E-07
1.71E-02
5.24E-06
6.46E-H)3
1.33E+04
1.33E+02
9.96E+02
5.31E+02
A-3-261
-------
TABLE A-3-65
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR DIAZINON (333-41-5)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation v V; :
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
«
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid phase value before being used in the calculations.
"^ Equations" ':;K|- --^VsiSttv -. :':-
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-l;B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8;B-4-l;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
ND
0.999382
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, Uglg DW plant ,
v ng/mL soil water'
Br,^
,l*g/g DW plant.
ftg/g soil
Br«
.Uglg DW plant.
Uglg soil
Br***,
^UglgDW plant ^
Uglg soil
*W
.Uglg DW plant*
Vg/g air
B*W
fHglg DW plant^
Uglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight
basis by using a moisture content of 87 percent.
•S'Wff value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value
provided in this table.
Br.. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
Srfrvgr value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
Bv^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K and /f that
is cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira,
Gaggi, Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a
fector of 100. No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce
and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C,
by using the H and K^ values that are provided in this table.
Bvf*w value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H
that is cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira,
Gaggi, Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a
factor of 100. No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce
and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C,
by using the Hand K^ values that are provided in this table.
"
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
2.06E+02
1.55E+00
2.43E-01
2.43E-01
1.31E+03
1.31E+03
A-3-262
-------
TABLE A-3-65
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR DIAZINON (333-41-5)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamilk (day/kg FW)
Baw(day/kgFW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Baesg (day/kg FW)
BacAtete, (day/kg FW)
JCFjM
(L/kg FW tissue)
&4^A(L/kgFW)
5&4F^ (unitless)
RJD (mg/kg/day)
Ora/ CSF (mg/kg/dayy1 ' .
.R/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URFOg/m3)'1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
5am0t value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
Bat^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA^, that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
Bap* value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Baberf value.
Ba,^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation vnthK that is
citea in California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using
the KM value that is provided in this table.
Bachtcha, value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef
(15/19) and multiplying it with the #aw value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited hi
U.S. EPA (1995b). The geometric mean value was obtained from various
literature sources (see Appendix A3.4).
BAFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value above 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BAF values were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995b): OR
Default BAF value recommended for use by U.S. EPA (1995b), when literature
data were not available
-
Equations
Value
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26 .
B-4-27
B-4-28
5.13E-05
1.62E-04
1.96E-04
5.13E-02
1.28E-04
4.63E+02
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
U.S. EPA (1997a)
~ '
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation, rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
_•-..••
- - ' ' • . ;
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
9.00E-04
ND
3.15E-03
ND
ND
Note: '
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available • .
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-263
-------
TABLE A-3-66
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR DIBENZ(A,H)ANTHRACENE (53-70-3)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MF(g/mole)
rm(K)
Vp(a.tin)
S(mg/L)
//(atnvmVmol)
A, (cmVs)
Dw(cmJ/s)
/^ (unitless)
/^(mL/g)
*y,(mL/g)
ttk(LflCg)
/ST4,(mL/g)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S and Vp values that are provided hi this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database, U.S. EPA (1994d).
£>„, value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database, U.S. EPA (1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean of measured values was obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd,,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the K^ value mat is provided in
this table.
Kdg, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
KcL, value was calculated by using the correlation equation vnthKoc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment Measured organic carbon m bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
-
-
~
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
278.33
539.1
2.70E-14
at25°C
(solid)
6.70E-04
1.12E-08
1.80E-02
6.01E-06
3.53E+06
1.79E+06
1.79E+04
1.34E+05
7.16E+04
A-3-264
-------
TABLE A-3-66
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR DIBENZ(A,H)ANTHRACENE (53-70-3)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
. ^ , Reference and Explanation
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using S, Tm, and Vp values
mat are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a liquid
phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Value
2.69E-01
0.010868
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, yglg DW plant .
" UglmL soil v/ater'
n
orrootveg
,Hglg DW plant.
y,glg soil
Brag
,\j.glg DW plant.
Uglg soil
Br/orage
^glg DW plant ^
Uglg soil
Bvag
,pLglg DW plant.
jj-glg air
^forage
,jj-glg DW plant.
Uglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the A™ value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
BT 'roof/eg vauie was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table (see section A3 .4.2 of Appendix A-3).
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km, value that
is provided in this table.
Brfi,,age value was calculated by using the correlation equation withAT^ that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is ,
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vigm (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and K^ values that are provided in this
table.
Bvf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the Hand K^ values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
2.56E+04
1.43E-04
6.36E-03
6.36E-03
4.68E+07
4.68E+07
A-3-265
-------
TABLE A-3-66
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR DIBENZ(A,H)ANTHRACENE (53-70-3)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^d&y/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
5aw (day/kg FW)
&Wto, (day/kg FW)
BCFju,
(L/kg FW tissue)
&tf)M(L/kgFW)
BSAFf* (unitless)
jBo^t value was calculated by using the correlation equation withX^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
j&W value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba 't value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A3.4.2 of Appendix A-3).
Ba.,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
IfaUfcfe, value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef
(5.8/19) and multiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A3.4.3 of Appendix A-
-
BAFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value above 4.0, as cited in U.S. EPA
(1995b). BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying a food chain
multiplier (FCM) with a geometric mean of various laboratory measured BCFs
obtained from various experimental studies cited in U.S. EPA (1998). FCMs were
obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc) — See Appendix A-3.
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Value,
2.80E-02
8.86E-02
1.07E-01
2.80E+01
7.00E-02
NA
1.28E+04
NA
Health Benchmarks
R/D (mg/kg/day)
OralCSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
jyC(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
fcg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
-
Calculated by multiplying the Oral CSF for Benzo(a)pyrene by the relative potency
factor for Dibenz(a,h)anthracene of 1.0 (U.S.EPA 1993e).
-
Calculated from Oral CSF using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
Value based on Oral CSF assuming route-to-route extrapolation.
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
ND
7.30E+00
ND
2.10E-03
7.30E+00
Note:
NA <• Not applicable
ND » No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-266
-------
TABLE A-3-67
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR l,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (96-12-8)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter ••
MF(g/mole)
rm(K)
Vp (atm)
S(mg/L)
//(atm'mVmol)
A,(cm2/s)
£>w(cm2/s)
AT^ (unitless)
J*(mL/g)
KiaUcmVg) .
K*w(L/Kg)
/Wfa(cm3/g)
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neill, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
jf value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Devalue was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoffand Long (1995).
Km value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). KO,. value was calculated by using the recommended K,,w value
that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with ATof that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd,,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kx that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdm because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kdts value was calculated by using the correlation equation withKoc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction hi bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by using the
Koc value that is .provided in this table.
Equations" 1 Value
-
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
~~
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
236.36
279.2
l.OE-03
at25°C
(liquid)
1.20E+03
1.97E-04
1.79E-02
8.79E-06
2.19E+02
9.47E+01
9.47E-01
7.10E400
3.79E+00
A-3-267
-------
TABLE A-3-67
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR l,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (96-12-8)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
fog (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation :'-t'::^v''^-';;:x;/v
^guations
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life hi soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited hi Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided hi this table.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
•/• Value"'-'
1.41E+00
0.999999
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, t^g/g DW plant .
*Hg/ntL soil water'
tftg/g DW plant*.
fig/g soil
fftg/g DW plant »
Uglg soil
.yg/g DW plant*
fjg/g soil
,Hglg DWplant^
ftg/g air
^glg DWplant^
Uglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^, value that is
provided in tnis table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Bfmaveg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
inthistable.
Br^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A™ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. -Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided hi this table.
Brj&s°st value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
hi Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km, value that is provided hi this table.
BVag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided hi this
table.
Bvfr-g. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and //that is
citedin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, ana Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and K^ values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
2.10E+01
2.22E+01
1.72E+00
1.72E+00
8.81E-02
8.81E-02
A-3-268
-------
TABLEA-3-67
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR l,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE (96-12-8)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
" Reference and Explanation ' '
' -1
Equations | Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Baaaic (day/kg FW)
5ai«f (day/kg FW)
B0pork (day/kg FW)
5aear (day/kg FW)
tfa^to, (day/kg FW)
BCF
(L/kgFW tissue)
AiFjuOVkgFW)
BSAFfrk (unitless)
5amjtt value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^g value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^* value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Ba ™ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
Bach!ckea value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation with Km
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980)— See Appendix A-3.
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
1.74E-06
5.50E-06
6.65E-06
1.74E-03
4.34E-06
3.54E+01
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RJD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
/f/CCmg/m3)
Inhalation URF
0/g/m3)-'
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
U.S.EPA (1996d)
U.S. EPA (1997c)
U.S. EPA (1997b)
Calculated from Oral CSF using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
U.S.EPA (1996d)
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
5.70E-05
1.40E+00
2.00E-04
4.00E-04
2.40E-03
Note:
NA= Not applicable
ND= No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-269
-------
TABLE A-3-68
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FORDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE (124-48-1)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MF(g/mole)
rm(K)
Vp(a.tai)
S(mg/L)
//(atnvmVmol)
£>.(cm2/s)
Dw(cmVs)
Kw (unitless)
tfw(mL/g)
^(cmVg)
Atfw(L/Kg)
/^(crnVg)
Reference and Explanation V •; ; :;A;',
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Vp value cited in Montgomery and Weldom (1991).
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
/7 value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Dtt value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
£>w value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994g).
KOC value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for phthalates
and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans,
cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). K^. value was calculated by using the recommended KM
value that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0( that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kda
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon hi soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd.,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0/. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdm because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon hi suspended sediment. Recommended Kdn value
was calculated by using the K^. value that is provided in this table.
Kdk, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
--
-
—
'
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
.B-4-20
-
"™
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
208.3
252.1 .
2.00E-02
at25°C
(liquid)
3.44E+03
1.21E-03
1.96E-02
1.05E-05
1.50E+02
7.05E+01
7.05E-01
5.29E+00
2.82E+00
A-3-270
-------
TABLE A-3-68
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE (124-48-1)
(Page 2 of 3)
' Parameter
Reference and Explanation >
Equations"
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1 99 1).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
1.41E+00
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, fJ.g/g DW plant .
* ngtmL soil water'
(//g/g DWplant^
Uglg soil
,yg/g DW plant.
/j.g/g soil
,/*g/g DW plant,
fj.g/g soil
,Hglg DW plant.
fj.g/g air
^forage
,tJ-glg DW plant.
pg/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with/i^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982'). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in tnis table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroof,eg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table.
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
Brfy.age value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kaw that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided in this table.
Bvforagf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.73E+01
2.45E+01
2.14E+00
2.14E+00
9.59E-03
9.59E-03
A-3-271
-------
TABLE A-3-68
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FORDIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE (124-48-1)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Bamm (day/kg FW)
£aw (day/kg FW)
j&o^i (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
5fldwa», (day/kg FW)
BCFV,
(L/kgFW tissue)
AiF^ (L/kgFW)
BSAFjw, (unitless)
Reference and Explanation ;^i"; :;ri: >;-.•'
Equations
fesi/alue":' -:
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamiik value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Anns (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided hi this table.
•Bfljnj- value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^f; value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Ba,- value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
BaMcta, value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF*,,, value calculated using the correlation equation with^,
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) (see Appendix A-3).
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
1.19E-06
3.77E-06
4.56E-06
1.19E-03
2.97E-06
2.65E+01
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RJD (mg/kg/day)
OralCSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
^/C(mg/ta3)
Inhalation URF
(A*g/mJ)-'
Inhalation CSF
(nag/kg/day)-'
U.S.EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997b)
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
Calculated from Oral CSF using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
Value based on Oral CSF assuming route-to-route extrapolation.
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
2.00E-02
8.40E-02
7.00E-02
2.4E-05
8.4E-02
Note:
NA » Not applicable
ND - No data available
All parameters are defined hi list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-272
-------
TABLE A-3-69
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE (95-50-1)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation '
Equations -
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MW(gfmole)
rm(K)
f£(atm)
S(mg/L)
//(atm-mVmol)
A,(cm2/s)
Av(cmVs)
Km (unitless)
^(mL/g)
JC^(cm3/g)
^(L/Kg)
JU^cnrVg)
Budavari, O'Neill, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neill, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
H value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dv value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kol that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate/^,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 m suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended KdM value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kdbs value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by using the
KOC value that is provided in this table.
-
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
147.01
256.1
1.79E-03
at25°C
(liquid)
1.25E+02
2.11E-03
4.11E-02
8.93E-06
2.79E+03
3.79E+02
3.79E400
2.84E+01
1.52E+01
A-3-273
-------
TABLE A-3-69
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE (95-50-1)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
teg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Equations v^ <
•: V, Value -
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991) and Mackay and others (1992).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
1.41E+00
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, itg/g DW plant .
* UglmL soil water
tUglg DW plant.
f*g/g soil
tUglg DW plant.
Hglg soil
tUgig DW plant.
Pgfg soil
,yg/g DW plant.
Hg/g air
^tglg DW plant ^
(*g/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
•S'Vajtws value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table.
Br^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A!^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Breast value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Kw value that is provided in this table.
Bvas value was calculated by using the correlation equation with ATml, and //that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and K^ values that are provided in this
table.
.BVJ&™, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and //that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the //and Km values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.11E+02
2.92E+01
3.95E-01
3.95E-01
1.24E-01
1.24E-01
A-3-274
-------
TABLE A-3-69
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE (95-50-1)
(Page 3 of 3)
?4ir.ilineter
Reference and Explanation
•> Equations
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bo.* (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
5aegg (day/kg FW)
Afca., (day/kg FW)
£C^*
(L/kg FW tissue)
A4F^(IVkgFW)
BSAFfrk (unitiess)
Baw,,t value was calculated by using the correlation equation vn&iK^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Baixef value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Itapor* value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
/to value was calculated by using the correlation equation withjK^, that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the £„,, value
that is provided in this table.
BaMclam value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation withJ^
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
—
~
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Health Benchmarks
RjD (mg/kg/day)
Ora/ CSF
(mg/kg/day)-'
J?/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
U.S EPA (1997c)
_
-
CM-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
Value
2.21E-05
7.00E-05
8.48E-05
2.21E-02
5.53E-05
2.45E+02
NA
NA
9.00E-02
ND
2.00E-01
ND
ND
Note:
NA= Not applicable
ND= No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii
A-3-275
-------
TABLE A-3-70
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE (541-73-1)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MP(g/mole)
r*(K)
Pfc(atm)
S(mg/L)
/f(atnrmVmol)
I».(cmVs)
ZUcmVs)
#„ (unitless)
^(mL/g)
&4(cmVjB)
K4»(L/Kg)
Reference and Explanation /-.': ••'. v.- ' '.•.•*;:,. ;-'.;"v> •*'-••'
'•• "'••Efluattbn$-''*?";
:' ^ Valfte •• •'*"
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Vp value cited in Howard (1989-1993).
S value cited in Howard (1989-1993).
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl,
and Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was
calculated by using the MF, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
D, value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995).
KK value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for
phthalates and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs,
dioxins, and furans, cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). Kac value was calculated by
using the recommended K^, value that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil.
Measured organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to
calculate Kdp because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic
carbon in soil. Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value
that is provided in this table.
Kd,,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0 that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in
suspended sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific
to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value vanes,
depending on the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment.
Recommended Kdm value was calculated by using the Kac value that is provided
in this table.
-
—
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
— •
—
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-3-3; B-3-4;
B-3-5; B-3-6; .
B-4-3; B-4-4;
B-4-5; B-4-6;
B-4-10;B-4-ll
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
147.01
297.86
3.03E-03
at25°C
(solid)
6.88E+01
1.11E+02
4.14E-02
8.85E-06
3.39E+03
8.03E+03
8.03E+01
6.02E-H)2
A-3-276
-------
TABLE A-3-70
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE (541-73-1)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
* Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Kdbs (cmVg)
ksg (year)"1
Fv (unitless)
Kdbs value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending
on the fraction of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in this table.
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in
Howard (1989-1993).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-1; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
3.21E-H)2
1.41E400
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, pg/g DW plant .
fj.g/mL soil water
(Pg/S DW plant \
pglg soil
(fj-g/g DW plant \
fj.g/g soil
fizgig DW plant \
V-glg soil
fizgig DW plant ^
pglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight
basis by using a moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroo
-------
TABLE A-3-70
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE (541-73-1)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value-
Biotransfer Factors for Plants (Continued)
5»W
,/jg/g DW plant.
ttg/g air
jftfcgp value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and #
that is cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira,
Gaggi, Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a
factor of 100. No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce
and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) or 25°C,
by using the Hand K^ values that are provided in this table.
B-3-8
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
BaM (day/Teg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
j&a^rt (day/kg FW)
Bam (day/kg FW)
tffldwa*. (day/kg FW)
aCFU
(L/kgFW tissue)
&4F^(L (mg/kg/day)
Ora/ CSF (mg/kg/day)-1
^/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF (^g/m3)'1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
U.S. EPA (1997a)
-
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
8.02E-02
2.69E-05
8.52E-05
1.03E-04
2.69E-02
6.72E-05
2.84E+02
NA
NA
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
8.90E-02
ND
3.12E-01
ND
ND
Note:
NA " Not applicable
ND - No data available
All parameters arc defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-278
-------
TABLE A-3-71
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE (106-46-7)
(Page 1 of 3)
A^;:'\ ''Parameter
JW(g/mole)
Tm(K)
Vp (atm)
5(mg/L)
J/(atm-m3/mol)
A,(cm2/s)
Dw(cm2/s)
.K^, (unitless)
^(mL/g)
M(cm3/g)
^(L/Kg)
A*4,(cmVg)
Reference and Explanation ' ' -
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (19.89)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
.ff value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MFF, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
£»„ value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b). .
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kof that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kda
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Kac value that is provided in
this table.
Kd^, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koq that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^, value
was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in this table.
Kdi, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon hi bottom sediment. Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by
using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
- -
-
,-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
"--. .
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
147.01
326.6
1.39E-03
at25°C
(solid)
7.30E+01
2.80E-03
4.14E-02
8.85E-06
2.58E+03
6.16E+02
6.16E+00
4.62E+01
2.46E+01
A.3-279
-------
TABLE A-3-71
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE (106-46-7)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
: Reference and Explanation ^ r
Equations
^'vVaUie;'^:'
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991) and Mackay, Shiu, and Ma
(1992).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that
are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a liquid
phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
1.41E+00
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, ngig DW plant ,
' pglmL soil \vatef
BfnMKs
.Uglg DWplant^
ftg/g soil
*w
^gfg DW plant ^
Hg/g soil
Brj^
^,iglg DW plant ^
Uglg soil
*W
^g/g DWplant^
HS/g air
Bv*nw
,Hglg DW plant ^
Uglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A^, that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value mat is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
*V«>tK? value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in mis table.
Br^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Brjfa,^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KB, value that is provided in this table.
Bv^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
£v/0™ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, and #that is
citedin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vigm (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided hi this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.05E402
1.70E+01
4.13E-01
4.13E-01
8.60E-02
8.60E-02
A-3-280
-------
TABLE A-3-71
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE (106-46-7)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
' < Reference and Explanation •
Equations
' Valiie> :S
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Baam (day/kg FW)
^^(day/kgFW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
5aear (day/kg FW)
5acWcte, (day/kg FW)
£«%* .
(L/kgFW tissue)
/^(L/kgFW)
BSAFfch (unitless)
BamM value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Baixef value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is .cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Bapork value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Ba,™ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
BCcMcko, value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^, value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation with Km
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
~ ' .
~ . .' ' .
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
2.05E-05
6.49E-05
7.86E-05
2.05E-02
5.12E-05
2.31E+02
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Ora/ CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
RfC (mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(ing/kg/day)-1
U.S.EPA (1996c)
U.S. EPA (1997b) . .
U.S. EPA (1997b) • ' '
Calculated from Oral CSF using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
Value based on Oral CSF- assuming route-to-route extrapolation.
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
2.30E-01
2.40E-02
8.00E-01
6.90E-03
2.40E-02
Note: •
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters .are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-281
-------
TABLE A-3-72
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE (91-94-1)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MF(g/mole)
Tm(K)
*5>(atm)
5(mg/L)
/f(atnvm'/mol)
£>.(cmVs)
£>w(cms/s)
AT^(unitless)
^(mL/g)
&4(cmVg)
Kd^QJKg)
Kdu (cmVg)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
";'- Value,
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neill, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neill, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
£>„ value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
KVC value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). KK value was calculated by using the recommended Km value
that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0f that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kdjy, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koq that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the Km value that is provided in this table.
Kdk, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by using the
Kgc value that is provided in this table.
-
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
~~
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
253.13
405.1
2.89E-10
at25°C
(solid)
3.52E+00
2.08E-08
2.28E-02
5.48E-06
3.76E+03
8.70E+02
8.70E+00
6.52E+01
3.48E+01
A-3-282
-------
TABLE A-3-72
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE (91-94-1)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation ' <
"Equations - | Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using 5, Tm, and Vp values
mat are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was' converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
1.41E+00
0.847495
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, uglg DW plant .
" fj-glmL soil \vater'
^"Z/gDW plant,
/j.g/g soil
,Hglg DW plant ^
fj-glg soil
^glg DW plant ^
Uglg soil
(//g/g DWplant^
IJ-glg air
,/j.g/g DW plant,
f-ig/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Brrooneg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table.
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
Br frag,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
K^ value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and K^ values that are provided in this
table.
Bvforagf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.38E+02
1.58E+01
3.32E-01
3.32E-01
1.73E+04
1.73E+04
A-3-283
-------
TABLE A-3-72
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 3,3f-DICHLOROBENZIDINE (91-94-1)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Bamm (day/kg FW)
Ba^f (day/kg FW)
Bo^j (day/kg FW)
Ber^day/kg FW)
JSa,^ (day/kg FW)
^^FM,
(L/kgFW tissue)
S^rt(L/kgFW)
BSiFJtA (unitless)
Reference and Explanation ;'" ; •'^,-;'^;vx^;i;',lv-.;7:''t
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamalc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms.(1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Baiaf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ber™* value was calculated by using thethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
anomultiplying it with the Ba^ value.
So™, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by, using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
Itodfeto. value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^af value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCFf,h value calculated using the correlation equation with A^»
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
- - '
-
•viEfloatioiis'S^
^>-;;Value-'.' ;.
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
2.99E-05
9.44E-05
1.14E-04
2.99E-02
7.45E-05
3.07E+02
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RJD (mg/kg/day)
Otf/CSF
(rngflcg/day)'1
^/C(rag/m3)
Inhalation URF
(pgAn*)'1
Mtalation CSF
(mg/kg/dayV
- •
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
Calculated 'from Oral CSF using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
Value based on Oral CSF assuming route-to-route extrapolation.
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
NA
4.50E-01
NA
1.30E-04
4.50E-01
Note;
NA * Not applicable
ND m No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-284
-------
TABLE A-3-73
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FORDICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE (75-71-8)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MF(g/mole)
r«(K)
Fp(atm)
5(mg/L)
/T(atm-m3/mol)
A,(cm2/s)
Av(cm2/s)
A^, (unitless)
#TC(mL/g)
*4(cm3/g)
tfaLOJKg)
Kdts(cm3/g)
Reference and Explanation' <
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b). ,
H value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Dw value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995).
KK value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). Koc value was calculated by using the recommended K^ value
that is provided in this table.
Kds value was calculated by using the correlation equation with ATof that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
ATcL, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koq that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate KdM because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
KiL, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by using the
Koc value that is provided in this table.
Equations
Value
-
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
—
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
120.92
115.1
6.40E+00
at25°C
(liquid)
3.0E+02
2.58E+00
7.77E-02
9.00E-06
1.44E+02
6.85E+0
6.85E-01
5.14E+00
2.74E+00
A-3-285
-------
TABLE A-3-73
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE (75-71-8)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation ' ,
Equations
Value .
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
^(year)"
Fv (unitless)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jafvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
1.41E+00
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
. fjg/g DW plant ,
* ngfmL soil water'
^g/g DW plant ^
Uglg soil
.pg/g DW plant.
Vg/g soil
tl*gtg DW plant.
ftg/g soil
^tgtg DW plant ^
(*gfg air
^g/g DWplant^
pglg air
RCF value' was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in tnis table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Brr—fKg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the .Krfj value provided
in this table (see section A3. 4.2 of Appendix A-3).
Br^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
Brcgap value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
K^, value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the //and Km values that are provided in this.
table.
tojbmgf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, and H that is
citedin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor bf 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.70E401
2.48E+01
2.19E-HK)
2.19E+00
4.33E-06
4.33E-06
A-3-286
-------
TABLE A-3-73
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FORDICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE (75-71-8)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
• ' Reference and Explanation
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Eaam (day/kg FW)
Babelf (day/kg FW)
Bapork (day/kg FW)
Baegg (day/kg FW)
Balaam, (day/kg FW)
*GFj»
(L/kg FW tissue)
BAF^fL/kgFW)
BSAFfl,h (unitless)
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
^(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
Bamttt value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA^,,, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Hatof value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Bapork value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba,^ value (see section A3.4.2 of Appendix A-3).
Ba,.. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A^,, that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
Bachidten value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A3.4.3 of Appendix A-3).
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation with Km
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
-
-
Equations
Value
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
1.15E-06
3.63E-06
4.40E-06
1.15E-03
2.87E-06
2.58E+01
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
U.S. EPA (1997c)
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
2.00E-01
ND
2.00E-01
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-287
-------
TABLE A-3-74
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE (75-34-3)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Afjf(g/mole)
TM(K)
f5?(atm)
5(mg/L)
/f(atnvmVmol)
£>.(cmVs)
A,(cmVs)
^(unitless)
A^(mL/g)
#4(cmVg)
,Ktfw(L/Kg)
jr<4,(cmVg)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neill, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neill, Smith, and Heckehnan (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
//value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
£>„ value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kof that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Kac value that is provided in
this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with KOI. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
Kdk, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon ofO.04 hi bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by using the
Kec value that is provided in this table.
-
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
98.97
175.1
3.0E-01
at25°C
(liquid)
5.16E+03
5.75E-03
7.42E-02
1.05E-05
6.20E+01
5.30E+01
5.30E-01
3.98E+00
2.12E+00
A-3-288
-------
TABLE A-3-74
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE (75-34-3)
(Page 2 of 3)
Fftmiiictei* *
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, ng/g DW plant .
^fj-g/mL soil water'
/?f
°'rootveg
^g/g DW plant )
pglg soil
Brag
.pg/g DWplant^
Uglg soil
Brfcrage
^glg DWplant^
/j.g/g soil
Bvag
,Hglg DW plant^
\ i . )
IMglg air
Storage
,^glg DW plant \
Uglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Br „ value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in tins table (see section A3 .4.2 of Appendix A-3).
Brs, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
BrM value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM, value that is provided in this table.
Bva value was calculated by using the correlation equation withK^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the # and Km values that are provided in this
table.
Bvf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and £f that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the HaaadK^ values that are provided in this
table.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
Value
1.643
1.000000
1.19E+01
2.24E+01
3.56E+00
3.56E+00
7.88E-04
7.88E-04
A-3-289
-------
TABLE A-3-74
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE (75-34-3)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Ba^t (day/kg FW)
5crw(dayflcgFW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
5o^, (day/kg FW)
^o^fcta (day/kg FW)
JSCF^
(L/kgFW tissue)
a4/^(L/kgFW)
BSAFju, (unitless)
R/D (mg/kg/day)
Ora/ CSF
(mg/kg/day)-'
/yC(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-'
Inhalation CSF
(mgflcg/day)-'
Reference and Explanation
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ito,^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Anns (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Belief value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using thethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba,^ value (see section A3 A3. of Appendix A-3).
2to._ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Callibmia EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
£
-------
TABLE A-3-75
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE (107-06-2)
(Page 1 of 3)
Reference* and ExDlanation
.'Equations 1 Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
98.96
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
233.1
Vp(atia)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
1.07E-01
at25°C
(liquid)
S(mg/L)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
8.31E403
//(atnvmVmol)
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6;B-4-12;
B-4-19
1.27E-03
A,(cm2/s)
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
7.19E-02
£>w(cm2/s)
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
B-4-20
1.10E-05
(unitless)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
2.90E+01
Koc(mL/g)
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
1.96E+01
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
uA EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kda
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in
this table.
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
1.96E-01
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdw value
was calculated by using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
1.47E+00
Kd,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^. that is cited in
U.s! EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon hi bottom sediment. Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by
using the Kx value that is provided hi this table. _^_____
B-4-16; B-4-25
7.83E-01
A-3-291
-------
TABLE A-3-75
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE (107-06-2)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
fog- (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
RCF
, fJtglg DW plant ,
*ltg/mL soil water
*„«*,
^Ug/g DW plant.
pglg soil
*W
^glg DW plant.
Uglg soil
Br^
,fsg/g DW plant.
Uglg soil
*W
^Uglg DW plant.
(*g/g air
*»W
^Vg/gDW plant ^
t*8/g air
Reference and Explanation .'"- -.""•'••' '•'•"/•,''• : , ;1 :Eaiiatiotis :S
' "' ''"Viirie'1'' '•'"'''
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A^, that is cited in
Briggs (1982V Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
jS'Vtv** value W38 calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table.
5/^yalue was calculated by using the correlation equation with A^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^, value that
is provided in this table.
Brfypg, value was calculated by using the correlation equation withjK^, that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM, value that is provided in this table.
Bv^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and .//that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calaman, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and K^, values that are provided in this table.
Bvf*tif value Vias calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and !£„ values that are provided in mis table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.41E+00
1.000000
9.41E+00
4.81E-HH
5.53E+00
5.53E+00
1.58E-03
1.58E-03
A-3-292
-------
TABLE A-3-75
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE (107-06-2)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter j
" ' ' Reference and Explanation > '
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamak (day/kg FW)
£aw(day/kg FW)
Bfl^ (day/kg FW)
Baegg (day/kg FW)
5acWctOT (day/kg FW)
aCFjw
(L//kg FW tissue)
JWFjwOVkgFW)
BSAFfl,h (unitless)
Bamak value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
jBflfew- value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Bapork value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Baes, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with-K^ that is cited in
CalSbrnia EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
BaMdan value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited hi
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCFM value calculated using the correlation equation with Km
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
-
.
„ Equations
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Health Benchmarks
RJD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
£/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
U.S.EPA (1996b)
U.S. EPA (1997b)
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997b)
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
, Value .
2.30E-07
7.28E-07
8.82E-07
2.30E-04
5.75E-07
7.61E+00
NA
NA
2.90E-03
9.10E-02
l.OOE-02
2.60E-05
9.10E-02
Note:
NA= Not applicable
ND= No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-293
-------
TABLE A-3-76
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE (75-35-4)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MF(g/mole)
r«(K)
^(atm)
S(mg/L)
//(atm-mVmol)
£>.(cmVs)
AXcmVs)
A"w (unitless)
AT^CmL/g)
£/,(cmVg)
*yw(L/Kg)
tf<4, (cm'/g)
Reference and Explanation
BifliatUftis'"^"
'^"•"Viiittte ^'--
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Ar value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kda
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the K.. value that is provided in
this table.
Kd.,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to sue
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the KK value that is provided in this table.
Kdfr value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kx that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon 01 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by using the
KOC value that is provided in this table.
—
—
-
—
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
—
—
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
96.95
150.6
7.88E-01
at25°C
(liquid)
3.0E-H)3
2.55E-02
7.53E-02
1.09E-05
1.32E+02
6.50E+01
6.50E-01
4.88E+00
2.60E+00
A-3-294
-------
TABLE A-3-76
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE (75-35-4)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation ' -
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
RCF
, pg/g DW plant . >
* Hg/mL soil 'water'
"frootveg
fizgig DW plant.
Uglg soil
,Hglg DW plant.
fj.g/g soil
ffj-glg DW plant.
jj-glg soil
fizgig DW plant \ ,
t^g/g air
Bvforage
,Hglg DW plant.
/j,g/g air
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using .the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the -K^ value that is
provided in tnis table. The value was converted to a diy weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroot> value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in .this table (see section A3.4.2 of Appendix A-3.).
Bra. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ Value that
is provided in this table. '
Brf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
Bv value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for.aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, .for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and K^ values that are provided in this
table.
Bvf,,. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and; Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended'by U.S; EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided in this
table.
B-l-2;B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Value
1.41E+00
1.000000
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.63E+01
2.50E+01
2.30E+00
2.30E+00
3.98E-04
3.98E-04
A-3-295
-------
TABLE A-3-76
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE (75-35-4)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
BaM (day/kg FW)
Ba^f (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
tffl^ (day/kg FW)
*«Uwu» (day/kg FW)
jSCFfcL
(L/kgFW tissue)
jR^,A (L/kgFW)
BSAFju, (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
.Ba,^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Anns (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with-K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using thethe fet content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba,^ value (see section A3.4.2 of Appendix A-3).
Ba.^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
Ba^-ta, value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Bate^ value (see section A3.4.3 of Appendix A-3).
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Kw value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation with K^,
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
-
-
Equations
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
•Valne^
1.05E-06
3.32E-06
4.01E-06
1.05E-03
2.62E-06
2.41E+01
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
R/D (mg/kg/day)
Ora/CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
^/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(^gfoi3)-'
Initiation CSF
(Jrog&g/day)-1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997b)
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S.EPA(1997c)
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
9.00E-03
6.00E-01
3.20E-02
5.00E-05
1.80E-01
Note:
NA m Not applicable
ND «• No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-296
-------
TABLE A-3-77
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR (CIS)-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE (156-59-2)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MF(g/mole)
r.(K)
Vp(aSm)
5(mg/L)
H (atm-mVmol)
A,(cm2/s)
A,(«anVs)
KM, (unitless)
A«(mL/g)
^4(cm3/g)
^C(L/Kg)
J&UonVg)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
Howard (1989-1993)
Howard (1989-1993)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). ,
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1 994c).
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl,
and Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was
calculated by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, for
phthalates and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs,
dioxins, and furans, cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). Koc value was calculated by
using the recommended K^ value that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil.
Measured organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to
calculate Kds, because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic
carbon in soil. Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value
that is provided in this table.
Kdp, value was calculated by using the correlation equation vnfla.Kac that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in
suspended sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific
to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies,
depending on the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment.
Recommended KdM value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided
in this table.
Kdte value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending
on the fraction of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value
was calculated by using the Kac value that is provided in this table.
-
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-3r3; B-3-4;
B-3-5; B-3-6;
B-4-3; B-4-4;
B-4-5; B-4-6;
B-4-10;B-4-ll
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
96.94
192.6
2.30E-01
at25°C
(liquid)
4.94E+03
4.51E-03
7.36E-02
1.13E-05
9.60E+01
4.98E+02
4.98E+00
3.73+01
1.99E+01
A-3-297
-------
TABLE A-3-77
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR (CIS)-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE (156-59-2)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
fargfyear)'1
Fv (uniUess)
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in
Mackay, Shiu, and Ma (1992).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977).
Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided
in the table.
Equations
•V-VaIue:W3
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-l;B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8;B-4-l;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
1.41E+00
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, Hg/g DW plant ,
UglmL soil water
Brnxvts
,Vg/g DW plant ,
Uglg soil
*W
,Hglg DW plant*
Hg/g soil
&}**«
.pglg DW plant.
ftg/g soil
*W
^Ug/g DWplant^
Uglg air
*>W
.Uglg DW plant.
Uglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight
basis by using a moisture content of 87 percent.
Br roo<™ g value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value
provided in this table.
JJr-, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the !£„, value that is provided hi this table.
Brfxegp value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the KM value that is provided in this table.
Bv^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that
is cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira,
Gaggi, Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a
factor of 100. No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce
and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C,
by using the Hand K^, values that are provided in this table.
Bvf*gp: value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H
that is cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira,
Gaggi, Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a
factor of 100. No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce
and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C,
by using the Hand K^ values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.41E+01
2.38E+00
2.77E+00
2.77E+00
1.60E-03
1.60E-03
A-3-298
-------
TABLE A-3-77
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR (CIS)-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE (156-59-2)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
3 Equations
, Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamm (day/kg FW)
5aw(day/kgFW)
&W (day/kg FW)
5oeggs (day/kg FW)
5acWdfcOT (day/kg FW)
£CF&*
(uniuess, FW tissue)
BAF^tL/kgFW)
BSAFfrk (unitless)
Bamllk value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using
the KW value that is provided in this table.
Bat,* value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using
the KO, value that is provided in this table.
Ba^r* value was calculated by using the fet content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
andmultiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Baegss value was calculated by using the correlation equation . with AL, that is
citea in California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using
the KO, value that is provided in this table.
Bachickal value was calculated by using the iat content ratio of chicken to beef
(15/19) and multiplying it with the Babaf value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF*,,, value calculated using the correlation equation with
K^ obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980)-^See Appendix
A-3.
--
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
7.63E-07
2.41E-06
2.92E-06
7.63E-04
1.90E-06
1.89E+01
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF (mg/kg/day)'1
RJC (mg/m3)
Inhalation URF (^g/m3)'1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/dayy1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
l.OOE-02
ND
3.50E-02
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-299
-------
TABLE A-3-78
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR (TRANS)-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE (156-60-5)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Exiflanaifiott !-: '-^ — v- ;',"•-.",•'/
•:\?SSqoatjoiis-'-v:(
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MFCg/mole)
rm.(cms/s)
£>w(cmVs)
A'w(unitless)
KK(mL/g)
A'4(cm3/g)
*yw(L/Kg)
A'4, (cmVg)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
//value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from WATERS model database (U.S. EPA 1995d).
£>„ value was obtained from WATERS model database (U.S. EPA 1995d)i
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0f that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd,,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd-, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^, value
was calculated by using the KK value that is provided in this table.
Kdjy value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited hi Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
-
-
"-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
,
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4;B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-2;B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
. B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8;B-4-l;
96.95
223.7
4.63E-01
at25°C
(liquid)
6.03E+03
7.44E-03
8.16E-02
9.75E-06
9.60E+01
3.80E+01
3.80E-01
2.85E+00
1.52E+00
1.41E+00
1.000000
A-3-300
-------
TABLE A-3-78
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR (TRANS)-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE (156-60-5)
(Page 2 of 3)
• Parameter
1 ' ' Reference and Explanation
'Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, fj,glg DW plant -
k UglmL soil water'
,/j.glg DW plant.
Hg/g soil
,Hg/g DW plant.
Hglg soil
,Hglg DW plant.
Hg/g soil
,fj.glg DW plant.
Hg/g air
BV*ZgDW plant.
fj.g/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with XL, that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the AL, value that is
provided in tnis table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Brrootvt, value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table.
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with-K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Br&rage value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM, value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and #that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and K^ values that are provided in this table.
Bv/orfgf value was calculated by using the correlation equation withj^ and //that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, ana Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (1) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided hi this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.41E+01
3.71E+01
2.77E400
2.77E+00
9.70E-04
9.70E-04
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamak (day/kg FW)
-W**.PW)
Bapork (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
BacUdm (day/kg FW)
Bamttk value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^cf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with AL, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
•Ztoport value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/1 9) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
5a value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
BaMckal value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
7.63E-07
2.41E-06
2.92E-06
7.63E-04
1.90E-06
A-3-301
-------
TABLE A-3-78
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR (TRANS)-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE (156-60-5)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
BCFjv,
(L/kg FW tissue)
MP^(L/kgFW)
BSAFju, (unitless)
Referenee\and*E:i|>lanattti*:^^
.;''V;Vatae;^;
Biotransfer Factors for Animals (Continued)
5Cfir were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCFf,h value calculated using the correlation equation with Km
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
- '
-•
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
1.89E+01
NA
NA
• Health Benchmarks
iyD (mg/kg/day)
OralCSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
/5/C (tng/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/te3)'1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
U.S.EPA (1997b)
-
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 nrYday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
- - •
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
2.0E-02
ND
7.0E-02
ND
ND
Note:
NA™ Not applicable
ND« No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-302
-------
TABLE A-3-79
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL (120-83-2)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
r«(K)
Vp (atm)
S(mg/L)
•HXatm-rnVmol)
A,(cm2/s)
A,(cm2/s)
A^,, (unitless)
^(mL/g)
*tfs(cm3/g)
^(L/Kg)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
.ff value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
For all ionizing organics, K,c values were estimated on the basis of pH. Estimated
values were obtained from U.S. EPA (1994c).
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation withi:os mat is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^, value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
-
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
163.01
318.1
7.21E-06
at25°C
(solid)
4.93E+03
2.38E-07
2.69E-02
7.79E-06
1.09E+03
EH £«
2 159!o
3 159.0
4 159.0
5 158.8
6 156.8
7 139.6
8 67.31
9 12.75
10 3.50
11 2.51
12 2.41
13 2.40
14 2.40
1.40E+00
1.05E+01
A-3-303
-------
TABLE A-3-79
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL (120-83-2)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Kdt, (cinVg)
teg (year)"1
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation : i
•"•'•'^^iwrtloas.;^
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Kdjy value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdb,, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdb, value was calculated by
using the KK value that is provided in this table.
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that
are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
;•"':' Valiie ^;.;"
5.58E+00
3.61E+00
0.999948
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
. fig/g DW plant ,
* ItglmL soil water
Br^^
*Hg/g DW plant.
pg/g soil
*«
.Uglg DW plant \
Uglg soil
*W
> Uglg DW plant.
f*g/g soil
AW
,(tg/g DW plant.
fig/g air
Sv^
^tglgDW plant j
(*gtg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Br^v- value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table.
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Brtgap. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Kn, value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and /Tthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
Bvforfsf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K~, and H that is
cifedin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chernello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and K^ values that are provided hi this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
5.68E+01
4.07E+01
6.82E-01
6.82E-01
4.01E+02
4.01E+02
A-3-304
-------
TABLE A-3-79
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL (120-83-2)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter ^
Reference and Explanation ' '
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamllk (day/kg FW)
Sa^(day/kgFW)
Baport (day/kg FW)
fia^ (day/kg FW)
fi^fcten (day/kg FW)
BCF^
(L/kg FW tissue)
&^(L/kgFW)
BSAFf,,, (unitless)
#amjtt value was calculated by using the correlation equation with J^,, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
.Saw value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited hi
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^,
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
.Ba value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Caluornia EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
5«<*fcto. yalue was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba,^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCFfah value calculated using the correlation equation with Km
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
-
-
Equations
Value
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
8.62E-06
2.73E-05
3.30E-05
8.62E-03
2.15E-05
1.19E+02
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RJD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
/J/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
i>g/m3)-'
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
-
- • . ...
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
3.0E-03
ND
1.1E-02
ND
ND
Note:
NA= Not applicable
ND= No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-305
-------
TABLE A-3-80
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE (78-87-5)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MF(g/mole)
Tm(K)
*5>(atm)
5(mg/L)
#(atm-m3/mol)
D. (cmVs)
£>w(cmVs)
/^(unitless)
#K(mL/g)
Atf,(cmVg)
J&kOJKg)
J&k(cmVg)
&£ (year)'1
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neill, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
H value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Devalue was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with AT^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kda
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the KM value that is provided in
this table.
Kd,-, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koq that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the KK value that is provided in this table.
Kdt. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon ofO.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon hi bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by using the
K0. value that is provided in this table.
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Equations
-
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
Value
112.99
172.7
6.66E-02
at25°C
(liquid)
2.68E+03
2.81E-03
6.21E-02
9.71E-06
1.78E+02
4.70E+01
4.70E-01
3.53E+00
1.88E+00
1.96E-01
A-3-306
-------
TABLE A-3-80
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE (78-87-5)
(Page 2 of 3)
Pftl*A&l6fCr
Fv (unitless)
RCF
, uglg DW plant .
* /j.g/mL soil water'
"rroatvcg
^glg DWplant^
fj,glg soil
Brag
,/j.g/g DWplant^
fig/g soil
Brforage
.\j-glg DWplant^
Hg/g soil
Bvag
^glg DWplant^
pg/g air
Bvforage
,fj.g/g DWplant^
Uglg air '•
• " • ' Reference and Explanation ' „
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
Equations
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroa{veg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table (see section A3.4.2 of Appendix A-3)
Brae value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Br&raK value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in thus table.
Bva, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Qaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided in this
table.
Bvfors,g, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with-K^, and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vigm (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
Value
1.000000
1.89E+01
4.01E+01
1.94E+00
1.94E+00
4.96E-03
4.96E-03
A-3-307
-------
TABLE A-3-80
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE (78-87-5)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Ba,^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Bo^, (day/kg FW)
^^(day&gFW)
BC/^
(L/kg, FW tissue)
fl4/?M(L/kgFW)
BSAFfi,* (unitless)
. . • Reference and Explanation .>;/••'•' --;:'-'/" xv'^-v -'.',.: .'.;•
^:Eflnatidiis'v^T •& 'Value '*•''.
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamllt value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Anns (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
5a4«f value was calculated by using the correlation equation with.*^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using thethe fat content, ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
ana multiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A3.4.2 of Appendix A-3).
Bam value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
^fcWfan value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A3.4.3 of Appendix A-3).
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF values were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995b).
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
1.41E-06
4.47E-06
5.41E-06
1.41E-03
3.53E-06
3.02E+01
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
ItfD (mg/kg/day)
Oro/CSF
(nig/kg/day)'1
tyC'Cmg/m3)
Inhalation URF
0*g/m})-'
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-'
U.S.EPA (1996c)
U.S.EPA(1997c))
U.S. EPA (1997b)
Calculated from Oral CSF using an inhalation rate of 20 m3/day and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
Value based on Oral CSF assuming route-to-route extrapolation.
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
1.10E-03
6.80E-02
4.00E-03
1.90E-05
6.80E-02
Note:
NA - Not applicable
ND « No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-308
-------
TABLE A-3-81
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR (CIS)-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE (542-75-6)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference ^nd Explanation
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties
AffF(g/mole)
r»(K)
Vp(atni)
5(mg/L)
#(atm-m3/mol)
Z>a(cm2/s)
Z)w(cm2/s)
KM, (unitless)
^(mL/g)
J&t(omVg)
^(L/Kg)
«4(cmVg)
fog (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
.ff value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kof that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured'
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kda
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the K^. value that is provided in
this table.
Kd., value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kof that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kam value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kdh, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon hi bottom sediment. Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by
using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided hi this table.
—
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8;B-4-l;
Value
110.98
189.1
4.11E-02
at25°C
(liquid)
1.55E+03
2.94E-03
6.26E-02
l.OOE-05
5.60E+01
2.70E+01
2.70E-01
2.03E+00
1.08E400
2.24E+01
1.000000
A-3-309
-------
TABLE A-3-81
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR (CIS)-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE (542-75-6)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
RCF
, ngtg DW plant .
*fig/mL soil wafer'
Bfnttnf
.Uglg DW plant.
Hg/g soil
*W
.Hgtg DW plant.
pg/g soil
Bf/«*tt
^g/g DW plant.
pglg soil
*W
.fig/g DW plant.
ftg/g air
*>W
^tig/g DW plant.
Pg/g air
Reference and Explanation \^f-,::-'- ':':[ :"' :'>-:;AvvH
•OJEqoatioiis^'
-••'«•' Value '•"£••
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K-, that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the AL, value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
^r»»(w» value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in ibis table.
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Bre—g, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KCM value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A^, and tfthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor oflOO.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM values that are provided in this table.
Bvfrag, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, and H that is
citedin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor oflOO.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KB, values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.15E-H)1
4.25E+01
3.78E+00
3.78E+00
1.38E-03
1.38E-03
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bo** (day/kg FW)
Ba^(day/kgFW)
Ba^t (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
BaMtm(d&y/kg¥W)
Bamat value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
80^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^,
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using thethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Bataf value.
Ba.- value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
J&^difcto! value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^^ value.
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
4.45E-07
1.41E-06
1.70E-06
4.45E-04
1.11E-06
A-3-310
-------
TABLE A-3-81
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR (CIS)-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE (542-75-6)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
BCFjM
(L/kgFW tissue)
AiFjuQL/kgFW)
BSAFw (unitless)
Reference and Explanation , ' -' :
Equations
Biotransfer Factors for Animals (Continued)
BCFs were used for compounds with a Ipg K^ value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation withX^,
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
-
- ' '
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Value
1.25E+01
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
RfC (mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1.
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1995b)
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S.EPA(1997c).
U.S. EPA (1997c)
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
3.0E-04
1.8E-01
2.0E-02
3.70E-05
1.3E-01
Note: • .
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available .
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-311
-------
TABLE A-3-82
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR DICHLORVOS (62-73-7)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MK(g/mole)
rm(K)
PJ>(atm)
S(mg/L)
#(atnvmVmol)
Z>.(cmVs)
£»w(cmVs)
^(unitiess)
K.,(mL/g)
JCdUcmVg)
«k(L«g)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
-
Vp value cited in Howard (1989-1993).
S value cited in Howard (1989-1993).
# value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MJV, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
De value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Recommended K^ value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995).
KK value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for phthalates
and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans,
cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). Kx value was calculated by using the recommended K^
value that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd.y, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koq that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended KdM value
was calculated by using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
-
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
--
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
Value
220.98
NA
6.93E-05
at25°C
(liquid)
1.6E+04
9.57E-07
2.32E-02
7.33E-06
2.69E+01
1.85E+01
1.85E-01
1.38E+00
A-3-312
-------
TABLE A-3-82
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR DICHLORVOS (62-73-7)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter ~ ,
XiUcmVg)
fag- (year):1 ,
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Kd£ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kac that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for.an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 hi bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon hi bottom sediment. Recommended Kdb, value was calculated by
using the Kac value that is provided in this table. .
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard
(1989-1993).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in the table.
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8;B-4-l;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12;B-5-l .
7.38E-01
1.49E-KU
0.999991
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, fj-glg DW plant .
^g/mL soil water'
sftg/g DW plant •.
pglg soil
ffj,g/g DW plant ^
Vg/g soil
Brforage
fH-glg DW plant ^
fj-g/g soil
(Mg/g DW plant ^
pglg air
,pg/g DW plant .
fj.g/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
. Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ Value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroopeg value was- calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table.
X
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with'AT^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table. .
Brjarag, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KW value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation withAT^ and Hthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vigm (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KO, values that are provided in this table.
Bvforagf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, andVighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vigm (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of TOO.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are' provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
9.24E+00
5.00E+01
5.78
5.78
1.95-03
1.95-03
A-3-313
-------
TABLE A-3-82
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR DICHLORVOS (62-73-7)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
;VVahw-.^
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^, i (day/kg FW)
Ba^day/kg FW)
Ba^k (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Sflcteto, (day/kg FW)
5CFM
(L/kg,FW tissue)
&4FM(L/kgFW)
BSAFfl,!, (unitless)
fia^/i value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
5cw value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Baja,} value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Ba.^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
•BflcW,?iOT value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
ana multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^, value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation with K^
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
—
—
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
2.14E-07
6.76E-07
8.18E-07
2.14E-04
5.33E-07
7.19E+00
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
KJD (mg/kg/day)
Ora/CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
/S/CXmg/m3)
Inhalation URF
0*g/m5)-'
Inhalation CSF
(mgj&g/day)"1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997b)
Calculated from Oral CSF using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
Value based on Oral CSF assuming route-to-route extrapolation.
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
5.0E-04
2.9E-01
5.00E-04
8.3E-05
2.9E-01
Note:
NA » Not applicable
ND - No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-314
-------
TABLE A-3-83
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR DIELDRIN (60-57-1)
(Page 1 of 3)
, ' .Parameter
Reference and -Explanation ••
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MT(g/mole)
r.(K)
J^(atm)
S(mg/L)
H (atm-mVmol)
A,(«n2/s)
A,(cm2/s)
A^ (unitless)
^(mL/g)
^(cmVg)
^(L/Kg)
fiUcmVg)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1992a)
5 value cited hi U.S. EPA (1992a)
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d)
Devalue was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kof that is cited hi
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon hi soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kdm value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 hi suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon hi suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon hi suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kdbs value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
-
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
380.93
449.1
1.72E-12
at25°C
(solid)
1.87E-01
3.51E-09
1.36E-02
4.29E-06
1.86E405
2.55E+04
2.55E+02
1.91E-H)3
1.02E+03
A-3-315
-------
TABLE A-3-83
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR DlELDRIN (60-57-1)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation '''v; :V^.';:Vi, ";-:,:';.';/--: ;'-'; \-lV'
Equations
'••• -'Value, ;:6
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
fag (year)"1
Fv (unitless)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life hi soil, as cited hi Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991)
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm aad-Vp values that
are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12;B-5-l
2.34E+00
0.082830
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, Uglg DW plant ,
* UglmL soil water'
(fig/g DW plant ^
Uglg soil
ftig/g DW plant ,
Uglg soil
fUglg DW plant \
Uglg soil
,Hglg DW plant-.
Uglg air
tt*g/g DW plant\
v / . '
Hg/g air
RCF value was calculated by' using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited hi
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table.. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
•B'Vcv.r vame Vlss calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
hi this table.
Br^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that '
is provided hi this table.
•B'fc™ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
hi Travis and Anns (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KW value that is provided hi this table.
Bv,g value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi. (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for above ground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM values that are provided hi this table.
Bvfoffsf vanie was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and /fthat is
citedin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for abovegound produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
2.66E+03
1.04E+01
3.49E-02
3.49E-02
6.50E+06
6.50E+06
A-3-316
-------
TABLE A-3-83
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR DIELDRIN (60-57-1)
(Page 3 of 3)
» Parameter
Bamat (day/kg FW)
fiaw(day/kgFW)
&V* (day/kg FW)
Baegg (day/kg FW)
&U*. (day/kg FW)
(L/kg FW tissue)
JWFjuOUkgFW)
BSAFf,h (unitless)
Reference and Explanation v" •> *
Equations
* Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
BamlVl value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ri value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Ba,g, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with-K^ that is cited hi
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^, value
that is provided in this table.
BaMAm value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
~
BAFs.Viete used for compounds with a log Km value above 4.0, as cited in U.S. EPA
(1995b). BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying a food chain
multiplier (FCM) with an estimated BCF. BCFs were estimated using the
correlation equation obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980).
FCMs were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc)— See Appendix A-3.
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
1.48E-03
4.67E-03
5.65E-03
1.48E-HJO
3.68E-03
NA
2.86E+04
NA
Health Benchmarks
RJD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
/?/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
U.S.EPA (1997b)
U.S.EPA (1997b) ,
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 m'/day and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
U.S.EPA (1997b)
U.S.EPA (1997c)
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
5.00E-05
1.60E+01
1.80E-04
4.60E-03
1.6-E+01
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined hi list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-317
-------
TABLE A-3-84
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR DIETHYL PHTHALATE (84-66-2)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MF(g/moIe)
r«(K)
J>(atm)
5(mg/L)
#(atovmVmol)
A,(cmVs)
A»(cmVs)
/iTw(unitless)
^(mL/g)
Ay,(cmVg)
^(UKg)
A'4, (cm'/g)
fo£(year)-'
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1 994c).
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), -which defines the constant Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
De value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
£>„ value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1 994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kof that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kda
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Kac value that is provided in
this table.
!&„, value was calculated by usjng the correlation equation with K^ that is cited hi
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the Value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
Kdj., value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by using the
KO, value that is provided in this table. • •
J&g-value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
1- '- ' •' ~ '."•*
Value
-
- •
- '
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3;B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
222.24
232.6
2.17E-06
at25°C
(liquid)
8.80E+02
5.48E-07
2.56E-02
6.35E-06
2.73E+04
8.20E+01
8.20E-01
6.15E+00
3.28E+00
4.52E+00
A-3-318
-------
TABLE A-3-84
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR DIETHYL PHTHALATE (84-66-2)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter-
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation •
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
0.999726
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, pg/g DW plant -
^fj,g/mL soil water
,/J-g/g DW plant.
IJ.glg soil
,f*g/g DW plant.
fj.g/g soil
Bfforage
,Hglg DW plant,
pg/g soil
,/zg/g DW plant.
fj-glg air
f/^g/g DW plant.
fj,g/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km, value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroot,eg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in mis table (see section A3 .4.2 of Appendix A-3).
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Bf&rage value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM, value that is provided hi this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the Hand K^ values that are provided in this
table.
Bvfyragf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^w and H that is
cited, in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, andvighi (1990); ana Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the Hand K^ values that are provided hi this
table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
6.12E+02
7.46E+02
1.06E-01
1.06E-01
5.42E403
5.42E+03
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamtlt (day/kg FW)
Ba^ef (day/kg FW)
Bamiltvalue was calculated by using the correlation equation withX^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Bai^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
B-3-1 1
B-3-10
2.17E-04
6.87E-04
A-3-319
-------
TABLE A-3-84
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR DIETHYL PHTHALATE (84-66-2)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter I Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value -.
Biotransfer Factors for Animals (Continued)
Bo,.,,, (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
^Osw^Cday/kgFW)
(L/kg FW tissue)
&4FM(L/kgFW)
BSAFfa, (unitless)
fia^ value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Babaf value (see section A3.4.2 of Appendix A-3).
Ba.— value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^, value
that is provided in this table.
Bacu*e, value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to1 beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba,^ value (see section A3 .4.3 of Appendix A-3).
-
BAFs were used for compounds with a log Km value above 4.0, as cited in U.S. EPA
(1995b). BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying a food chain
multiplier (FCM) with an estimated BCF. BCFs were estimated using the
correlation equation obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980).
FCMs were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc) — See Appendix A-3.
-
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
8.31E-04
2.17E-01
5.42E-04
NA
2.45E+03
NA
Health Benchmarks
^D (mg/kg/day)
Oa/CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
/5/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(HS/mY
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
8.00E-01
ND
2.80E+00
ND
ND
Note:
NA « Not applicable
ND «• No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-320
-------
TABLE A-3-85
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR DIMETHYL PHTHALATE (131-11-3)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter *
AflF(g/mole)
rm(K)
Vp (atm)
S(mg/L)
//(amvmVmol)
A,(cm2/s)
Dw(cmVs)
^(unitless)
^(mL/g)
*4(cmVg)
fikOL/Kg)
J&UcnrVg)
- Reference and Explanation
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1 994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
/Tvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl,
and Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was
calculated by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Devalue was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA^ for
phthalates and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs,
dioxins, and fiirans, cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). Kac value was calculated by
using the recommended K^ value that is provided hi this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil.
Measured organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to
calculate Kd, because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic
carbon in soil. Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
Kd^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
hi U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in
suspended sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific
to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies,
depending on the fraction of organic carbon hi suspended sediment.
Recommended Kdm value was calculated by using the K^. value that is provided
hi this table.
Kd,,s value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending
on the fraction of organic carbon hi bottom sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in this table.
-
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8;B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-3-3; B-3-4;
B-3-5; B-3-6;
B-4-3; B-4-4;
B-4-5; B-4-6;
B-4-10;B-4-ll
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
Vatae ,
194.19
273.1
2.17E-06
at25°C
(liquid)
4.19E-H)3
1.01E-07
2.96E-02
7.13E-06
4.30E+01
2.66E+02
2.66E+00
2.00E+01
1.06E+01
A-3-321
-------
TABLE A-3-85
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR DIMETHYL PHTHALATE (131-11-3)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
fag (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation '
lEDnnfltions
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in
Howard, Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977).
Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided
in the table.
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-1; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
3.61E+01
0.999726
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, Vg/g DW plant .
UglmL soil water
B^n* Kg
,lig/g DW plant.
ftg/g soil
*«
.Hgfg DW plant ,
Uglg soil
*W
^ftg/g DW plant j
(Jtglg soil
3v
DV*t
.ttgfg DW plant.
l*g/g air
*W
,Hg/g DW plant.
Hg/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with-K^, that is cited
in Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight
basis by using a moisture content of 87 percent.
Bfrootvtz value w35 calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value
provided in this table.
Br™ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the K^ value that is provided in this table.
Br/xygf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the K^ value that is provided in this table.
Bv^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K and tfthat
is cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira,
Gaggi, Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a
factor of 100. No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce
and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C,
by using the H and Km values that are provided in this table.
Bvf*9&> value Vfas calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H
that is cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira,
Gaggi, Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a
factor of 100. No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce
and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C,
by using the Hand K^ values that are provided in this table.
"
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.05E+01
3.95E+00
4.40E+00
4.40E+00
3.05E+01
3.05E+01
A-3-322
-------
TABLE A-3-85
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR DIMETHYL PHTHALATE (131-11-3)
(Page 3 of 3)
' P&jTJiiiictd* J> "^
' - . Reference and Explanation „ . * I Equations
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^(day/kgFW)
Bapork (day/kg FW)
5aegsi (day/kg FW)
AfcM. (day/kg FW)
*CFjM
(L/kgFW tissue)
jfclF^,, (L/kgFW)
BSAFfrk (unitless)
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Ora/ CSF (mg/kg/day)'1
.R/C (mg/m3)
Inhalation URF (Mg/m3)'1
Inhalation CSF
(me/ke/day)"1
Baml,lc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with.^ that is
citea in Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
Bat,* value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using
the KO, value that is provided in this table.
Ba.,^ value was calculated by using the fet content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Ba,...., value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
citeo in California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using
the KO, value that is provided in this table.
&><*fctn value was calculated by using the fet content ratio of chicken to beef
(15/19) and multiplying it with the Ba,^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCFm value calculated using the correlation equation with
Km obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980)— See Appendix
A-3.
—
—
Health Benchmarks
U.S. EPA (1997a)
—
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 m3/day and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
—
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
Value
3.42E-07
1.08E-06
1.31E-06
3.42E-04
8.53E-07
1.03E+01
NA.
NA
l.OOE+01
NA
3.50E+01
NA
NA
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-323
-------
TABLE A-3-86
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL (105-67-9)
(Page 1 of 4)
Parameter
MFF(g/mole)
rw(K)
*5?(atm)
S(mg/L)
#(atm-mVmol)
A,(cmVs)
A,(cm2/s)
jK"w (unitlcss)
tfK(mL/g)
KbUcmVg)
Reference and Explanation •'••• :'- . -
''''''' !SiiniiiKifts";"'~^ "•''"' ''^Vfliiifi ' ''
Chemical/Physical Properties
Moses (1978)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1992a).
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1992a).
/fvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
D, value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
A, value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Recommended KM value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995).
For all ionizing organics, Kec values were estimated on the basis of pH. Estimated
values were obtained from U.S. EPA (1994c).
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd ,
because the value vanes, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
—
~
~
—
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
122.17
300.1
2.18E-07
at25°C
(solid)
6.25E+03
4.27E-09
5.84E-02
8.69E-06
2.29E+02
?H K^
1 126.0
2 126.0
3 126.0
4 126.0
5 126.0
6 125.99
7 125.9
8 125.02
9 116.87
10 71.06
1.1 15.77
12 3.43'
13 2.05
14 1.91
1.26E+00
A-3-324
-------
TABLE A-3-86
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL (105-67-9)
(Page 2 of 4)
, PlirdlilCter
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
&C(L/Kg)
Kdts(cm3/g)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate KdM because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kdbs value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdts value was calculated by
using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that
are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a liquid
phase value before being used in the calculations.
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, , /j.g/g DW plant -
^ Hg/mL soil water'
n
"^root veg
,Hg/g DWplant^
f^g/g soil
Brag
^g/g DW plant )
/j.g/g soil
Bfforage
,fj.glg DWplant^
/j.g/g soil
Bvag
,l*g/g DW plant^
\ , . )
/j.g/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroo, value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table.
fira_ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distraction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Brf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
K^ value that is provided in this table.
Bv™ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and /fthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and VigW (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
Equations
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-8
B-2-8
. Value
9.44E+00
5.04E400
3.61E+01
0.997404
2.16E+01
1.71E+01
1.68E+00
1.68E+00
4.27E+03
A-3-325
-------
TABLE A-3-86
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL (105-67-9)
(Page 3 of 4)
Parameter
*W
*Hglg DW plant ^
Uglg air
Reference and Explanation '••" ; -•.-•••.•'••/^i'rK^v.v^.H;-"^^
• '."•'• Equations ~ ;*-' '
^''•'•Vahie-1'^
Biotransfer Factors for Plants (Continued)
^jfrsp va^ue was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, and //that is
citedin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Kw values that are provided in this table.
B-3-8
4.27E+03
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^fr (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^t (day/kg FW)
J?ow (day/Teg FW)
tfa.AUm (day/kg FW)
Ba>4,
(L/kg FW tissue)
Atf^OL/kgFW)
BSAFf,h (unitless)
BaMk value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Anns (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^g value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Anns (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^j. value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba,^ value.
Sa.^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A^, that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the A_. value
that is provided in this table.
BaMda, value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCFju, value calculated using the correlation equation with AL,
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
1.82E-06
5.75E-06
6.96E-06
1.82E-03
4.54E-06
3.66E+01
NA
NA
A-3-326
-------
TABLE A-3-86
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL (105-67-9)
(Page 4 of 4)
t,:; wfearameter
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
RJC(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1 .
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
- ' - Reference and Explanation '• ' ,
Health Benchmarks
U.S.EPA (1997b)
-
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
-
~
, Equations •
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
Value
2.00E-02
ND
7.00E-02
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-327
-------
TABLE A-3-87
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 3,3'-DIMETHYOXYBENZIDINE (119-90-4)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MF(g/mole)
r«(K)
yp(atm)
S(mg/L)
//(atnvmVmol)
D, (cmVs)
Dw(cm2/s)
KM (unitless)
^(mL/g)
&/,(cmVg)
*4,(UKg)
tf<4,(cmVg)
Reference and Explanation ^
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
/fvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MV, S, and Vp values that are provided in mis table.
Da value was obtained from WATERS model database (U.S. EPA 1995d).
Dv value was obtained from WATERS model database (U.S. EPA 1995d).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoffand Long (1995).
X^e value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans, cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). KO, value was calculated by using the recommended K^ value
that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon hi soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kda
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
JS2L, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^0? that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
Kdfc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kac that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon hi bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon hi bottom sediment. Recommended Kdb, value was calculated by
using the K^ value that is provided in this table.
Equations
—
—
~
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
—
—
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10;B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
Value
244.28
410.1
3.30E-10
at 25°C
(solid)
2.40E+02
3.36E-10
2.38E-02
5.60E-06
6.46E+01
3.65E+01
3.65E-01
2.74E+00
1.46E+00
A-3-328
-------
TABLE A-3-87
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 3,3'-DIMETHYOXYBENZIDINE (119-90-4)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that
are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
Equations
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Value
1.41E-HM)
0.876710
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, ftg/g DW plant -
k IMglmL soil water'
fizgig DW plant \
Uglg soil
ffiig/g DW plant ^
l^glg soil
, Uglg DW plant .
Hg/g soil
f/^g/g DW plant ^
(. . , . )
y-glg air
^glg DW plant )
Uglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in tnis table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Brrooyeg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table.
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Br^age value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM, value that is provided hi this table.
Bv „„ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and #that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided in this table.
Bvfo value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and £f that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari; Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor oflOO.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10 •
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.21E-H)1
3.30E+01
3.48E400
3.48E+00
1.41E+04
1.41E+04
A-3-329
-------
TABLE A-3-87
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 3,3'-DIMETHYOXYBENZIDINE (119-90-4)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Ba*tu: (day/kg FW)
&W (day/kg FW)
So,*,* (day/kg FW)
fla,^ (day/kg FW)
Ba*^ (day/kg FW)
SC/^»
(L/kgFW tissue)
S^OL/kgFW)
B£H^ (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^yi value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Anns (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^f. value was calculated by using the fet content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Bat^ value.
j?a._ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^, value
that is provided in this table.
BaMdm value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba,^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF/u value calculated using the correlation equation with K^
obtained Scorn Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
5.13E-07
1.62E-06
1.96E-06
5.13E-04
1.28E-06
1.40E+01
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RJD (mg/kg/day)
Ora/CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
j??/C(mg/ni5)
Inhalation URF
(VBfaY
Inhalation CSF
^mg/kg/day)-'
-
U.S. EPA (1997c)
-
Calculated from Oral CSF using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
U.S.EPA(1997c)
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
ND
1.40E-02
ND
4.0E-03
1.40E-02
Note:
NA- Not applicable
ND* No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-330
-------
TABLE A-3-88
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,3-DINITROBENZENE (99-65-0)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation ' - "
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
r«(K)
^(atm)
S(mg/L)
/?(atm-m3/mol)
Da(cm2/s)
Dw(cm2/s)
KM, (unitless)
A^(mL/g)
M(mL/g)
Ait, (I/Kg)
A*4,(niL/g)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994f).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994f).
W value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database, U.S. EPA (1994d).
£>„ value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database, U.S. EPA (1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994f).
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans, as cited in U.S.
EPA (1994c). Koc value was calculated by using the recommended K^ value that is
provided in this table.
Kds value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon hi soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate .Kef.,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
KcL, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kof that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the Kac value that is provided in this table.
Kdbs value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 hi bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdb,, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Equations
,, -Value %
-
-
-
~
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
. —
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
168.11
363
4.0E-07
at25°C
(solid)
5.4E+02
1.25E-07
3.18E-02
9.15E-06
3.10E+01
2.06E-H)!
2.06E-01
1.55E+00
8.25E-01
A-3-331
-------
TABLE A-3-88
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,3-DINITROBENZENE (99-65-0)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
As* (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
RCF
, Uglg DW plant ,
" pgfmL soil water'
tUglg DW plant*
Uglg soil
tffg/g DW plant*
pglg soil
rUglg DW plant*
Uglg soil
,ttg/g DW plant*
Uglg air
,Hglg DW plant*
Hg/g air
Reference and Explanation ;,'»:: T
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited hi Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited hi Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using S, Tm and Vp values
that are provided hi this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used hi die calculations.
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited hi
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
BrroafKf value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with me Kds value provided
La this table.
*
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table. ,
Breast value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in "Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM, value that is provided hi this table.
Bveg value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, C. Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the Hand K^ values that are provided hi this
table.
Bvfora& value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and //that is
citedin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the Hand Km values that are provided hi this'
table.
Equations
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
•-" " '-.V > " ";:':
Value
1.41E-HM)
0.999661
9.58E+00
4.64E+01
5.32E+00
5.32E+00
1.74E+01
1.74E+01
A-3-332
-------
TABLE A-3-88
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,3-DINITROBENZENE (99-65-0)
(Page 3 of 3)
' ^vJ]>aTameter'--.^:-:;'i
-y:; :::"; •:>' '\!'V^V';V>/-i-:'i.i? ^Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamilt (day/kg FW)
Baw (day/kg FW)
5^ (day/kg FW)
fla^day/kgFW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
BCF^
(L/kg FW tissue)
A^OVkgFW)
BSAFfc,, (unitless)
5<7m/ft value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
B<*>xe[ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Baeg!, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
Bachicken value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF values were geometric mean laboratory or field derived
values obtained from various literature sources cited in U.S. EPA (1998) — See
Appendix A-3.
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
2.46E-07
7.79E-07
9.43E-07
2.46E-04
6.15E-07
7.40E+01
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
5/U (mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
l.OOE-04
ND
3.50E-04
ND
ND
Note:
NA= Not applicable
ND= No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-333
-------
TABLE A-3-89
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2,4-DINITROPHENOL (51-28-5)
(Page 1 of 4)
Parameter
W(g/mole)
Tn(K)
*}?(atm)
5(mg/L)
//(atnvmVmol)
D«(cinVs)
A,(cmVs)
K^ (unitless)
A^OnL/g)
AWjCcmVg)
Reference and Explanation , \
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). .
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
//value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided hi this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Z>w value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1 994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
For all ionizing organics, K „ values were estimated on the basis of pH. Estimated
values were obtained from U.S. EPA (1994c).
^
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kof that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd,,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table for a pll of 7.0.
-
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4;B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
184.11
385.1
1.52E-07
at25°C
(solid)
5.8E+03
4.82E-09
2.73E-02
9.06E-06
3.30E+01
EH £*
1 0.80
2 0.79
3 0.72
4 0.38
5 0.08
6 0.02
7 0.01
8 0.01
9 0.01
10 0.01
11 0.01
12 0.01
13 0.01
14 0.01
l.OE-04
(atpH7.0)
A-3-334
-------
TABLE A-3-89
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2,4-DINITROPHENOL (51-28-5)
(Page 2 of 4)
Parameter
fit. (I/Kg)
*UcmVg)
fag (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value '
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
.KiaL, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited hi
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon hi suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon hi suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the Km value that is provided hi this table for a pH of 7.0.
Kdj.s value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 hi bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies depending on the fraction
of organic carbon hi bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the K^. value that is provided hi this table for a pH of 7.0.
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life hi soil, as cited hi Howard,
Boethlhig, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited hi Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using S, Tm, and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8;B-4-l;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
7.5E-04
(atpH7.0)
4.0E-04
(atpH7.0)
9.62E-01
0.999461
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, y-glg DW plant .
* [j,glmL soil water'
,/J^g/g DW plant-.
Hg/g soil
,yg/g DW plant.
ftg/g soil
(Mg/g DW plant )
IJ-glg soil
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with/sT^, that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided hi this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent
Brroof> was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided hi
this tame (see section A3.4.2 in Appendix A-3).
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided hi this table.
Br 'forage value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited
hiTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM value that is provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
9.74E+00
9.74E+04
5.13E+00
5.13E+00
A-3-335
-------
TABLE A-3-89
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2,4-DINITROPHENOL (51-28-5)
(Page 3 of 4)
Parameter
,pglg DW plant v
t*glg air
^glg DWplant^
l*g/g air
Reference and Explanation ••: ^ ''••'-'.'-
Biotransfer Factors for Plants (Continued)
BVag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and VighS (1992); then reducing this value by a foctor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the Fand Km values that are provided in this
table.
BVf^,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
citedin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, ana Vighi (1990); ana Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vight (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature
(T) of 25°C, by using the Hand K^ values that are provided in this table.
' \- -.Equations >-v
B-2-8
B-3-8
-^.Vatae-::
4.80E+02
4.80E+02
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^m (day/kg FW)
2?a^(day/kg FW)
Barark (day/kg FW)
5ow (day/kg FW)
flOrffcta (day/kg FW)
(L/kgFW tissue)
E^J^rtCL/kgFW)
BSAFjtt), (unitless)
BamUi value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Bataf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^f value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A3.4.2 of Appendix A-3).
Ba,— value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kmr that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided m this table.
BciMcu,, value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba,^ value (see section A3.4.3 of Appendix A-3).
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF*,,, value calculated using the correlation equation with^,
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980)— See Appendix A-3.
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
2.62E-07
8.29E-07
l.OOE-06
2.62E-04
6.54E-07
8.40E+00
NA
NA
A-3-336
-------
TABLE A-3-89
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2,4-DINITROPHENOL (51-28-5)
(Page 4 of 4)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
• Equations
Value
Health Benchmarks
RjD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
RfC(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(^g/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
Calculated from RjD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
2.0E-03
ND
7.0E-03
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-337
-------
TABLE A-3-90
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE (121-14-2)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MF(g/mole)
rm.(cnrVs)
Dw(cmVs)
AT^, (unitless)
^(mL/g)
AT4 (mL/g)
A'rfw(L/Kg)
#4, (mL/g)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties
Howard (1989-1993)
Howard (1989-1993)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
H value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database U.S. EPA (1994d).
A, value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database U.S. EPA (1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
KK value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans, as cited in U.S.
EPA (1994c). KK value was calculated by using the recommended Km value that is
provided in this table.
Kd. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Ka( that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd-, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0, that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdn value
was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in this table.
Kdf,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with-S^, that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the K^. value that is provided in this table.
-
~
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
~~
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
Value
182.14
344
2.29E-07
at25°C
(solid)
2.85E+02
1.46E-07
3.09E-02
7.86E-06
9.90E+01
5.10E-H)!
5.10E-01
3.83E+00
2.04E+00
A-3-338
-------
TABLE A-3-90
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE (121-14-2)
(Page 2 of 3)
> Parameter
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using S, Tm and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used hi the calculations.
Equations >
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
. , /j.g/g DW plant -
" pglmL soil water
"rnal\eg
,/^g/g DW plant ^
pglg soil
Br,g
^g/g DWplant^
Vg/g soil
Borage
^g/g DWplant^
fj.g/g soil
Bvag
,Hg/g DW plant ^
Uglg air
Barest
,fj.glg DW plant.
IJ-glg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Brmot value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table.
fir value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided hi this table.
Br^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM, value that is provided in this table.
fiv.. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Qaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
B* rcra,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and # that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and VigM (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and K^ values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
Value ,
1.41E+00
0.999088
1.43E+01
2.80E+01
2.72E+00
2.72E+00
5.10E+01
5.10E+01
A-3-339
-------
TABLE A-3-90
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE (121-14-2)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Ba^z (day/kg FW)
BaiHf (day/kg FW)
£0^ (day/kg FW)
5flw (day/kg FW)
•S^Ufatei (day/kg FW)
SCFjw
(L/kgFW tissue)
HiFjwO/kgFW)
JfcSMFw
(unitIess,FW tissue)
Reference and Explanation ' - :- ' 1: v j Equations '>'--•&
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with AT that is cited in
Travis and Anns (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Bot^f value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^f. value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Sfl—y value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Cafiiornia EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided m this table.
Ba (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)4
/5/t7(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(PSfaY
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
U.S. EPA (1995d)
The Oral CSF value represents a 2,4/2,6-Dinitrotoluene mixture (U.S. EPA 1997b).
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 m'/day and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
-
Value based on Oral CSF assuming route-to-route extrapolation.
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
2.0E-03
6.8E-01
7.0E-03
ND
6.8E-01
Note:
NA-Not applicable
ND1* No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-340
-------
TABLE A-3-91
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE (606-20-2)
(Page 1 of 3)
Psi*£tlflcid*
MT(g/mole)
rm(K)
Vp(atm)
S(mg/L)
//XatnvmVmol)
Da (cm2/s)
Dw(cm2/s)
^.(unitless)
^(mL/g)
Kds(mL/g)
*4,(L/Kg)
Kdbs (mL/g)
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties
Howard (1989-1993)
Howard (1989-1993)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
H value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database U.S. EPA (1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database U.S. EPA (1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for aU
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). Koc value was calculated by using the recommended Km value
that is provided in this table.
Kd. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kdp
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Kx value that is provided in
this table.
Kd,., value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kdbs value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.s! EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Equations
-
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
"
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
,Valne
182.15
339
7.47E-07
at25°C
(solid)
1.05E+03
1.30E-07
3.11E-02 :
7.76E-06
7.70E+01
4.19E+01
4.19E-01
3.14E+00
1.68E+00
A-3-341
-------
TABLE A-3-91
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE (606-20-2)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation - ; ' ; ;!;! ' <; \ J ;-"- Eaaations -:<-:
••^"'•Valiie-''' '•
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
fa£(year)-l
Fv (unitless)
RCF
. Uglg DW plant ,
'fig/mL soil water'
Brnentg
,l*g/g DW plant.
Hgfg soil
Br«
^Vg/g DW plant.
t*g/g soil
Brf**s*
^g/g DW plant.
Hg/g soil
BV«
^g/g DW plant.
Uglg air
Bvfi»*
.Uglg DW plant.
Uglg air
Aigvalue was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using S, Tm and Vp values
that _are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982'). Recommended value was calculated by using the K value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
•e'V(v«j value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table.
Br^ yalue was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
Brte°st value w35 calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
!£„, value that is provided in this table.
jBv^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor oflOO.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided in this table.
Bvforf!p value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor oflOO.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.41E+00
0.999686
1.29E+01
3.08E+01
3.15E+00
3.15EH-00
4.41E+01
4.41E+01
A-3-342
-------
TABLE A-3-91
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2,6-DINITROTOLTJENE (606-20-2)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter "
Bamilk (day/kg FW)
^^(day/kgFW).
Bapork (day/kg FW)
fia^ (day/kg FW)
BflUa., (day/kg FW)
flCFjw
(L/kg FW tissue)
BAF^fL/kgFW)
BSAF^ivnitless)
Reference and Explanation
.Equations - -
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
fia^jfc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^,
value, that is provided in this table.
Bot^f value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^k value was calculated by using thethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Baeg. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km, value
that is provided in this table.
Baclllcken value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF values were geometric mean laboratory or field derived
values obtained from various literature sources cited in U.S. EPA (1998) — See
Appendix A-3.
- '
_
-B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
6.12E-07
1.93E-06
2.34E-06
6.12E-04
1.53E-06
5.92E+00
NA.
NA
Health Benchmarks •
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
RJC (mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
The Oral CSF value represents a 2,4/2,6-Dinitrotoluene mixture (U.S. EPA 1997b).
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
.
U.S. EPA (1997b)
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
;c-2-2
l.OE-03
6.8E-01
3.5E-03
ND
6.8E-01
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-343
-------
TABLE A-3-92
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,4-DIOXANE (123-91-1)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MF(g/mole)
Fm(K)
Fp(atm)
S(mg/L)
//(atnvmVmol)
£>.(cms/s)
A,(cmVs)
A'^unitless)
A-^mL/g)
A'4(cmVg)
A-o^CL/Kg)
Ai4,(cmVg)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b)
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b)
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Upvalue was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Km value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b)
KK value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans, cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). Kx value was calculated by using the recommended Km value
that is provided hi this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0f that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd-y, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon hi suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
KM,* value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kfc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 m bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbll, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the K^. value that is provided in this table.
~
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
—
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
^ititm:^
88.10
284.9
5.00E-02
at25°C
(liquid)
9.00E+05
4.89E-06
9.20E-02
1.05E-05
5.40E-01
8.76E-01
8.76E-03
6.57E-02
3.50E-02
A-3-344
-------
TABLE A-3-92
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,4-DIOXANE (123-91-1)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation . " '
"Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table. .
B-l-2;B-2-2;
B-3,2;B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-l;B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
1.41E+00
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, uglg DW plant -
" ftg/mL soil water'
"^root veg
,f*g/g DW plant ,
fj.g/g soil
,pglg DW plant.
Uglg soil
fizgig DW plant.
f^g/g soil
**«
(Mg/g DW plant )
fj-g/g air
fUg/g DW plant.
/j,g/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
&r mot veg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table.
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Br^rage value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KW value that is provided hi this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation withiT^ and //that is
cited hi Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided in this table.
Bvf,rfsf value was calculated by using the correlation equation withJ^ and //that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and VigM (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
6.45E+OQ
7.37E+02
5.53E+01
5.53E+01
5.93E-03
5:93E-03
A-3-345
-------
TABLE A-3-92
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,4-DIOXANE (123-91-1)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation ;; • :• v
Equations
•• ;^ Value';^-''
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^t (day/kg FW)
Bflw (day/kg FW)
So^^ta (day/kg FW)
flCf^L
(Ukg FW tissue)
&6F^M(L/kgFW)
BSAFfa, (unitless)
.Sfl^at value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Bau<{ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Anns (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
•BflfflM value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
Ba
-------
TABLE A-3-93
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZBVE (122-66-7)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties
MT(g/mole)
r-(K)
yp(atm)
S(mg/L)
/^(atm-mVmol)
Z>a(cm2/s)
I>w(cm2/s)
Km (unitless)
/^(mL/g)
J&UcmVg)
JMOT(L/Kg)
led* (cmVg)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b)
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b)
ff value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans, cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). Kac value was calculated by using the recommended K^ value
that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kof that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd.,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kog that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kam value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kdbs value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Equations
Value
-
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
"™*
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
184.24
401.1
4.74E-08
at25°C
(solid)
6.80E401
1.28E-07
2.95E-02
7.24E-06
8.71E+02
2.78E+02
2.78E+00
2.09E+01
1.11E+01
A-3-347
-------
TABLE A-3-93
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE (122-66-7)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation !; 5 0 ^
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)*
Fv (unitless)
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that
are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
•\
Equations
B-l-2;B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
:->Valiie:'::;
1.41E+00
0.998800
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, ftg/g DW plant ,
" ftglmL soil water'
^gfg DW plant ^
(ig/g soil
r/jgfg DW plant ^
pglg soil
fliglg DW plant \
fjg/g soil
^g/g DW plant.
figlg air
^g/gDWplant^
figlg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is'cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
jBr™,™ value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table. • . .......
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Br&p>& value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table. .
BVag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and K&, values that are provided in this table.
Bvfirtgf va^ue was calculated by using the correlation equation with X" and H that is
citedin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Kn, values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8 .
B-3-8
4.90E+01
1.76E+01
7.74E-01
7.74E-01
5.89E+02
5.89E+02
A-3-348
-------
TABLE A-3-93
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE (122-66-7)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation • '
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Eamak (day/kg FW)
5a^(day/kgFW)
Bapork (day/kg FW)
Baeggs (day/kg FW)
JtoUfcta, (day/kg FW)
*CF**
(L/kg FW tissue)
BAF^fL/kgFW)
BSAFf,h (unitless)
Bamilk value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Babetf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K&,
value that is provided in this table.
Bapark value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Baeg?! value was calculated by using the correlation equation with JK^, that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
Bachlchal value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba,^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation with K^
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
„
-
Equations
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
•> " Value
6.92E-06
2.19E-05
2.65E-05
6.92E-03
1.73E-05
1.01E+02
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
Rfl) (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)-'
RJC(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-'
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
-
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997c)
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2 •
ND
8.0E-01
ND
2.2E-04
8.0E-01
Note:
NA= Not applicable
ND= No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-349
-------
TABLE A-3-94
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR DISULFOTON (298-04-4)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MP(g/mole)
ym(K)
Fp(atm)
S(mg/L)
//XatnvmYmol)
D.(cmVs)
Dw(cmVs)
A'w(unitless)
J^(mL/^
JW,(cmVg)
/^(L/Kg)
ft/w(cmVg)
Reference and Explanation " ;
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
rm value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
H value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
£>„ value was calculated using the equation cited hi U.S. EPA (1996a).
Devalue was calculated using the equation cited hi U.S. EPA (1996a).
Recommended K^ value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995).
KO. value was calculated by using the correlation equation withX™ f°r phthalates
and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans,
cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). K^. value was calculated by using the recommended Km
value that is provided hi this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with KO! that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd~, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kgc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction oF 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon hi suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^, value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kdt, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon hi bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the K^. value that is provided hi this table.
(Equations '
Value
'
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
~™
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
274.38
248
3.7E-07
at25°C
(liquid)
1.6E+01
4.12E-06
4.50E-02
5.21E-06
9.55E+03
1.80E+03
1.80E+01
1.35E+02
7.20E+01
A-3-350
-------
TABLE A-3-94
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR DISULFOTON (298-04-4)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year/1
Fv (unitless)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that
are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a liquid
phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-l;B-2-l;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, /J.g/g DW plant .
" uglmL soil -water
Brnotoeg
^glg DWplant^
fj.g/g soil
Brag
,l*glg DWplant^
\jiglg soil
Brf,rage
^glg DW plant j
/j.g/g soil
Bvag
.Uglg DW plant )
Uglg air
Bvforag*
(Vg/g DW plant.
k , . )
pg/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroaf>eg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table.
Bra, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Br&rage value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
Bva, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and /f that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); andBacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
Bvf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
Value
1.20E+01
0.998394
2.76E+02
1.55E+01
1.94E-01
1.94E-01
2.35E+02
2.35E+02
A-3-351
-------
TABLE A-3-94
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR DISULFOTON (298-04-4)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter | Reference and Explanation •"
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bi^k(dty/kg¥W)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
5flMteiOT(day^gFW)
j5CF_
(L/k£ FW tissue)
aiFjWl(L/kgFW)
BSAFfiA (unitless)
5amffit value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^f value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Ba—, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited hi
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
•SflcWoUn value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value below 4.0, as cited hi
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation with^
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
-
-
Equations | ^'^lue ' £
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
7.59E-05
2.40E-04
2.90E-04
7.59E-02
1.89E-04
6.23E+02
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RJD (mg/kg/day)
OralCSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
/5/C (mg/mj)
Inhalation URF
0<£/mJ)-'
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-'
U.S.EPA(1997b)
-
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
4.00E-05
ND
1.40E-04
ND
ND
Note:
NA« Not applicable
ND « No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-352
-------
TABLE A-3-95
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ENDOSULFAN I (115-29-7)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties
MT(g/mole)
rm(K)
Vp (atm)
S(mg/L)
J?(atmin3/mol)
£>a(cm2/s)
£>w(cm2/s)
KM, (unitless)
^(mL/g)
Kds(cm3/g)
J&L(L/Kg)
Kd,, (cm3/g)
fog (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1992a).
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1992a).
/Tvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Devalue was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0f that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kda
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the KM value that is provided in
this table.
Kd^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the Kac value that is provided in this table.
Kdbs value was calculated by using the correlation equation withX0£! that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
, should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the K^. value that is provided in.this table.
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that
are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a liquid
phase value before being used in the calculations.
-
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
'-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8;B-4-l;
Value,
406.95
343.1
1.72E-11
at25°C
(solid)
2.31E-01
3.04E-08
9.59E-03
5.76E-06
3.02E+03
2.04E+03
2.04E+01
1.53E-K)2
8.16E-H)!
2.78E+01
0.074720
A-3-353
-------
TABLE A-3-95
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ENDOSULFAN I (115-29-7)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
RCF
, ftg/g DW plant .
' figlmL soil water
BrMfMS
.yg/g DW plant.
Hg/g soil
*W
.yg/g DW plant.
pglg soil
Br^
,Hglg DW plant.
ftgfg soil
*W
,t*gfg DW plant.
fig/g air
*»W
^glg DW plant ^
t*g/g air
Reference and Explanation
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the AT" value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent
•B'Vootxy value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table.
Br^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Js^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
Brggag, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Kg* value that is provided in this table.
Bv^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and /f that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KB, values that are provided in this table.
Bvforftf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, and H that is
citedin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); ana Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided hi this table.
Equations
Value
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.17E+02
5.75E+00
3.77E-01
3.77E-01
9.36E+03
9.36E+03
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
.So^Cday/kgFW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Bam (day/kg FW)
5flMfcto. (day/kg FW)
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Baiaf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Anns (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the KM
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^,. value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Ba.^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
5acAfctol value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba,^ value.
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
2.40E-05
7.59E-05
9.18E-05
2.40E-02
5.99E-05
A-3-354
-------
TABLE A-3-95
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ENDOSULFAN I (115-29-7)
(Page 3 of 3)
D'SFSmctCF *•
BCFfish
(L/kg FW tissue)
Atf^ffAgFW)
tf&fFjz,,, (unitless)
RJD (mg/kg/day)
Ora/ CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
/?/U (mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(niK/kg/day)'1
' , i:" Reference and Explanation :
Biotransfer Factors for Animals (Continued)
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCFM value calculated using the correlation equation with K^
obtained ftom Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
—
— " ' •
Health Benchmarks
U.S.EPA (1997b)
-
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 m3/day and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
-
- . .
Equations
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
Value
2.60E+02
NA
NA
6.00E-03
ND
2.10E-02
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-355
-------
TABLE A-3-96
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ENDRIN (72-20-8)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MF(g/mole)
JT«.(cmVs)
A,(cmVs)
A'^Cunitless)
JUmL/g)
^(cm'/g)
A'«U(L/Kg)
JsT4, (cinVg)
Reference and Explanation - ' ;
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckehnan (1989)
U.S.EPA (1992a)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1992a)
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1992a)
/Tvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d)
A, value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1 994c).
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate/^,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate KdM because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
Kdt, value was calculated by using the correlation equation wither,,,, that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 hi bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
Equations
•^"•'••'••Va'Iiie''- :';
-
—
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
380.93
473.1
7.68E-10
at25°C
(solid)
2.46E-01
1.19E-06
1.07E-02
5.76E-06
7.79E+04
1.08E+08
1.08E+02
8.11E+02
4.32E+02
A-3-356
-------
TABLE A-3-96
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ENDRIN (72-20-8)
(Page 2 of 3)
Fftr&iuGtcr
" Reference and Explanation
Equations '
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991)
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, pglg DW plant .
" uglmL soil water'
Bfrootoeg
^g/g DWplant^
fj.glg soil
Brag
,pg/g DW plant.
Uglg soil
BTforagf
,Hg/g DWplant^
y-glg soil
*>«
(Hgfg DW plant.
pglg air
Bvforage
,fj.glg DW plant \
IJ-glg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent
jBrroo!veg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table.
Br value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
BrforalK value was calculated by using the correlation equation withX^, that is cited
inTrtvis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM, value that is provided in this table.
Bva, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
Bvf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided in this table.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
Value
3.61E+04
0.563463
1.36E+03
1.26E401
5.76E-02
5.76E-02
7.62E403
7.62E+03
A-3-357
-------
TABLE A-3-96
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ENDRIN (72-20-8)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
.Ba,^ (day/kg FW)
fla^ (day/kg FW)
#
-------
TABLE A-3-97
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR EPICHLOROHYDRIN (106-89-8)
(Page 1 of 3)
:r:f! Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MT(g/mole)
r«(K)
*5?(atm)
S(mg/L)
/f (atnvmVmol)
A,(cm2/s)
Z>w(cm2/s)
Km (unitless)
^c(mL/g)
fi4(cm3/g)
*^(L/Kg)
Kdbs(cm3/g)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
H value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated •
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995).
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans, cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). Koc value was calculated by using the recommended Km .value
that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kof that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kda
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^T<,c that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended ' •
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value was
calculated by using the Kac value that is provided in this table. . . ' •
Kdbs value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon m bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Koc value that is provided in this table..
-
-
—
..
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
~~
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3;B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18;
B-4-24
B-4-16;
B-4-25
92.53
247.5
2.20E-02
at25°C
(liquid)
6.60E+04
3.08E-05
8.13E-02
1.10E-05
1.78E+00
2.22E+00
2.22E-02
1.66E-01
8.88E-02
A-3-359
-------
TABLE A-3-97
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR EPICHLOROHYDRIN (106-89-8)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter | Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
fog- (year)'1
Fv(unitless)
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited hi Howard,
Boethling, Jams, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
Equations
Value
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
9.03E+00
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, Hgtg DW plant ,
'ng/mL soil water'
.pglg DW plant \
l*g/g soil
tffglg DW plant*
Hgtg soil
Br*^lgDW plant.
pglg soil
fizgig DW plant.
Uglg air
.Hgtg DW plant.
Uglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A!^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
•B'Vtwr value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table.
Breg value was calculated by using the correlation equation with AT^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
jBr^p value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for abovegroud
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Bv^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Kat values that are provided in this table.
Bvf,,^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and Hihat is
citedin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and K^ values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
6.67E+00
3.00E+02
2.77E+01
2.77E+01
3.35E-03
3.35E-03
A-3-360
-------
TABLE A-3-97
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR EPICHLOROHYDRIN (106-89-8)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation > >
Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamm (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
&V* (day/kg FW)
5aear (day/kg FW)
Ha!.**,, (day/kg FW)
fiCF^A
(L/kg FW tissue)
&4FM(L/kgFW)
5&1F^A (unitless)
5am,/t value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table. .
Bateg value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
Bapork value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Bataf value.
Ba e-. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided m this table.
Btchich* value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^, value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation with K^
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980)— See Appendix A-3.
.......
- - .
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
1.41E-08
4.47E-08
5.41E-08
1.41E-05
3.53E-08
9.13E-01
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RJD (mg/kg/day)
Ora/ CSF
(mg/kg/day)J
#/U (mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
teg/m3)-'
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
U.S. EPA (1995b)
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997c) %
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
2.00E-03
9.90E-03
l.OOE-03
1.20E-06
4.20E-03
Note:
NA= Not applicable •
ND= No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-361
-------
TABLE A-3-98
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ETHYL METHACRYLATE (97-63-2)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
AW(g/mole)
F«(K)
Vp (atm)
5(mg/L)
//(atnvmVmol)
£>.(cmVs)
A,(cmVs)
A'w(unitless)
/^(mL/g)
-K4(cmVg)
^(L/Kg)
Atfj,(cmVg)
Reference and Explanation :^ i
:•.. .Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
JWF value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b)
-
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
/fvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
De value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
/>„ value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995).
KK value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). Kx value was calculated by using the recommended Km value
that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with AT0i. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd.,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0f that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
Kdjy value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site- conditions, should be
used to calculate Kdbn because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by using the
KK value that is provided in this table.
-
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
~~
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
114.14
NA
2.30E-02
at 25°C
1.90E+04
1.38E-04
8.07E-02
9.35E-06
3.89E+01
2.46E+01
2.46E-01
1.85E+00
9.80E-01
A-3-362
-------
TABLE A-3-98
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ETHYL METHACRYLATE (97-63-2)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation " -, ,-, , "-' , -S'
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Ksg value was assumed to be 0 due to a lack of data.
Fv value cited in NC DEHNR (1 997).
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
' l^S/S DW plant .
^/j.g/mL soil water'
"rrootveg
,/J.g/g DW plant \
l^glg soil
,fj.glg DW plant.
V-&I& soil
Brforage
,fj.g/g DW plant.
fj.g/g soil
,fj.g/g DW plant,
fj.g/g air
,/j.g/g DW plant,
/j.g/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroolve, value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in tiiis table.
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Br^rage value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with AT^ and //that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the Hand K^ values that are provided in this
table.
Bvforagf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and //that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, andVighi (1990); ana Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and K^ values that are provided in this
table.
Equations
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8;B-4-l;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Vidae
0.0
1.000000
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.02E+01
4.14E+01
4.67E+00
4.67E400
2.00E-02
2.00E-02
A-3-363
-------
TABLE A-3-98
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ETHYL METHACRYLATE (97-63-2)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation : \ :, - ':
Equations'
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba,^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^f {day/kg FW)
BafMk (day/kg FW)
Bam (day/kg FW)
tfflsteu. (day/kg FW)
BC*M,
(L/kgFW tissue)
jRlfy,* (L/kgFW)
BSAF/M (unltless)
jBaw,» value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Bataf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^j. value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Ba,^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided m this table.
.Bflrffctoi value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCFf,h value calculated using the correlation equation with^,
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
3.09E-07
9.77E-07
1.18E-06
3.09E-04
7.71E-07
9.51E+00
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
iyD (mg/kg/day)
OralCSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
.tyC (mg/m})
Inhalation URF
(Mgta5)-'
Inhalation CSF
^rng/kg/day)"1
U.S. EPA (1997c)
-,
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
-
- • .
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
9.00E-02
ND
3.20E-01
ND
ND
Note;
NA« Not applicable
ND- No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-364
-------
TABLE A-3-99
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ETHYL METHANESULFONATE (62-50-0)
(Page 1 of 3)
< ^Parameter
A0F(g/mole)
r»(K).
Vp (atari)
S(mg/L)
/f(atm-mVmol)
A,(cm2/s)
Z>w(cm2/s)
Km (unitless)
^(mL/g)
AfiUcmVg)
JC4.(L/Kg)
Kdt, (cm3/g)
Reference and Explanation < < '''''.."
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Vp value cited hi U.S. EPA (1995b).
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Devalue was calculated using the equation cited hi U.S. EPA (1996a).
Arithmetic mean value cited hi Karickhoff and Long (1995).
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). Kac value was calculated by using the recommended K^, value
that is provided hi this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0. that is cited hi
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon hi soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon hi soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the K., value that is provided in
this table for a pH of 7.0.
Kd,,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA™ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumedorganic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon hi suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^, value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kdg value was calculated by using the correlation equation with.*:,,,, that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon of 0.04 hi bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon hi bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
carbon hi bottom sediment. Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by using the
Koc value that is provided hi this table.
* Equations
Value
~
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B*4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
124.15
373.0
3.50E-04
at25°C
(solid)
4.90E+05
8.87E-08
7.63E-02
8.84E-06
1.12E+00
1.55E+00
1.55E-02
1.16E-01
6.19E-02
A-3-365
-------
TABLE A-3-99
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ETHYL METHANESULFONATE (62-50-0)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter | Reference and Explanation ; ;
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
fog (year)'1
Fv(unitlcss)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvisr Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using S, Tm, and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
7.88E+01
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
. ug/g DW plant ,
'ftg/mL soil water"
,(*g/g DW plant*
Uglg soil
,Hglg DW plant ^
l*g/g soil
,fjg/g DW plant*
ftg/g soil
st*g/g DW plant*
t*S/S air
sftg/g DW plant*
Hgfg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited hi
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^, value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry .weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Brreot«g value was calculated by dividing the .RCF value with the Kds value provided
hi tmstable (see section A4.3.2 of Appendix A-3).
Bra, value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA^ that is cited hi
Travis and Anns (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
.Br,- value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
K^, value that is provided hi this table.
Bve. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited hi Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor oflOO,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25 °C, by using the H and K^, values that are provided hi this
table.
Bvicafr«x value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, and /Tthat
is cited hi Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the # and Km values that are provided hi this
table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
6.56E+00
4.24E+02
3.63E+01
3.63E+01
7.11E-01
7.11E-01
A-3-366
-------
TABLE A-3-99
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ETHYL METHANESULFONATE (62-50-0)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
* Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamak (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
-Baear (day/kg FW)
Boufcta (day/kg FW)
BCFjM
(L/kg, FW tissue)
Atf^OAgFW)
BSAFf,), (unitless)
5amfft value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
J&W* value was calculated by using thethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A4.3.2 of Appendix A-3).
.Ba value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
Sachtcken value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A4.3.3 of Appendix A-3).
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation with A^,
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
8.90E-09
2..81E-08
3.41E-08
8.90E-06
2.22E-08
6.42E-01
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RJD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
.R/C (mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
0/g/m3)-'
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-'
~
U.S. EPA (1995b)
-
Calculated from Oral CSF using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
Value based on Oral CSF assuming route-to-route extrapolation.
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
ND
2.93E+02
ND
8.4E+01
2.93E+02
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined hi list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-367
-------
TABLE A-3-100
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ETHYLBENZENE (100-41-4)
(Page 1 of 3)
Pjuniisii&tcr
MF(g/mole)
Tm(K)
*{7(atm)
S(mg/L)
tf(atnvmVmol)
£>.(cmVs)
4,(cnrYs)
^(unitless)
/r«(mL/g)
«t(cmVg)
*4w(L/Kg)
ft4.(cmVg)
Reference and Explanation r
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
De value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculated,,,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd-,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate /CdL, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^, value
was calculated by using the KK value that is provided in this table.
Kdt, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited hi
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the K^ value that is provided in this table.
-
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
Value
106.16
178.1
1.26E-02
at25°C
(liquid)
1.73E-H)2
7.73E-03
7.65E-02
8.49E-06
1.33E+03
2.04E+02
2.04E+00
1.53E401
8.16E+00
A-3-368
-------
TABLE A-3-100
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ETHYLBENZENE (100-41-4)
(Page 2 of 3)
^Parameter'
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991) and Mackay, Shiu, and Ma
(1992).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited hi Junge (1977). Recommended
Value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7;B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
2.53E401
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, ng/g DW plant .
% UglmL soil water'
,jj.glg DW plant.
Uglg soil
,Hglg DW plant.
Uglg soil
fUglg DW plant^
fj-glg soil
. uglg DW plant.
Uglg air
,/tg/g DW plant.
/j.g/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the AL, value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroot>eg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table.
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
Br&rage value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Ar^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM, value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
Bvforagf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
cited m Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
6.52E+01
3.20E401
6.07E-01
6.07E-01
1..53E-02
1.53E-02
A-3-369
-------
TABLE A-3-100
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ETHYLBENZENE (100-41-4)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Ba^n (day/kg FW)
Ba^dayfkgFW)
Ba^t (day/kg FW)
Baw(day/kgFW)
£o«*fcim (day/kg FW)
BCFju,
(L/kgFW tissue)
aiFysrtOLjfcgFW)
BSAFjs,* (unitless)
•. '.' IteferencVandExpiaiia!^
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamm value was calculated by using the correlation equation with AT^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^^value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^j. value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Ba,^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^, value
that is provided in this table.
Ba
-------
TABLE A-3-101
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ETHYLENE DIBROMIDE (106-93-4)
(Page 1 of 3)
' Parameter
MP(g/mole)
r«(K)
Fp(atm)
S(mgfL)
/f(atm-m3/mol)
Z>a(cm2/s)
JUcnrVs)
jRT^, (imitless)
^(mL/g)
Kds(cm3/g)
JG4r(L/Kg)
^(cm'/g)
Reference and Explanation
< Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dv value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1 994d).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995).
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation witfa.^ for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans, cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). K^ value was calculated by using the recommended Km value
that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kda
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd-y, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kdi, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with KK that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the K^. value mat is provided in this table.
-
-
—
--
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
"
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
Value
187.88
282.1
l.OOE-02
at25°C
(liquid)
4.20E+03
4.47E-04
2.17E-02
1.19E-05
5.62E+01
3.28E+01
3.28E-01
2.46E+00
1.31E+00
A-3-371
-------
TABLE A-3-101
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ETHYLENE DIBROMIDE (106-93-4)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
tag (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, ttg/g DW plant .
'fig/mL soil water'
Br^t
,Hgfg DW plant.
PglS soil
*«
.Hg/g DW plant.
Uglg soil
Br*-*
^glg DW plant j
pgtg S°M
AW
^tglg DW plant j
pg/g air
*»W
^Vg/g DWplant^
Hg/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982V Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
•ff'Vootwy value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table.
Breg value was calculated by using the correlation equation withjST^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
5»%™ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
inTravis and Anns (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM, value that is provided in this table.
fiv^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and .ffthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
fop, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and #that is
citedin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, andvighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-l;B-3-7;
B-3-8;B-4-l;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
Value i
1.41E+00
1.000000
1.15E-H)!
3.50E+01
3.77E+00
3.77E+00
9.13E-03
9.13E-03
A-3-372
-------
TABLE A-3-101
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ETHYLENE DIBROMIDE (106-93-4)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamm (day/kg FW)
5crw(day/kgFW)
Bapork (day/kg FW)
Baegg (day/kg FW)
5acWdten (day/kg FW)
BCFju,
(L/kg FW tissue)
&4F^(L/kgFW)
BSAFfck (unitless)
5am(/t value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
JJfliMf value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA^,, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^i, value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba,^ value.
5a value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^, value
that is provided m this table.
Bachlcken value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^g value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation with #„„,
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
-
~
Equations
Value
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
4.47E-07
1.41E-06
1.71E-06
4.47E-04
1.12E-06
1.26E+01
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
.R/C (mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
U.S. EPA (1996c)
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1995b)
U.S. EPA (1997b)
Calculated from Inhalation URF using an inhalation rate of 20 nrVday and a human
body weight of 70 kg.
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
5.70E-05
8.50E401
2.00E-04
2.20E-04
7.70E-01
Note:
NA= Not applicable
ND= No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-373
-------
TABLE A-3-102
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ETHYLENE OXIDE (75-21-8)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter | Reference and Explanation ^ : , i !
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
Tm(K.)
PJ?(atm)
S(mg/L)
//(atnrmVmol)
A,(cmVs)
£>w(cnrVs)
^, (unitless)
/i^CmL/g)
/&f,(cmVg)
tf
-------
TABLE A-3-102
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ETHYLENE OXIDE (75-21-8)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7;B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
1.000000 ,
• , Biotransfer Factors for Plants ' . •
RCF
, pg/g DW plant -
' pglmL soil -water
"^root veg
..f^glg DWplant^
l^glg soil
Brag .
^glg DWplant^
l^glg soil
Brforage
^fj,g/g DW plant.
l^glg soil '.
Bvag
,/j.g/g DW plant.
f^g/g air
Bvforase
,/^g/g DW plant.
/j.g/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. -The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.. " •
J?rroo. veg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table (see section A3.4.2 of Appendix A-3). .
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value' was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table. - •
Br&raee value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
K^ value that is provided in this table.
Bva value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for' aboveground produce and forage. ;Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by'using the H and Km values that are provided in this
table. .
ifrfc™ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and ti that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); andBacci, Cerejeira, .Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the Hand K^, values that are provided in this
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
6.44E+00
7.80E+02
5.77E+01
5.77E+01
1.60E-04
1.60E-04
• • . • Biotransfer Factors for Animals .-•-.. •
Bamilt (day/kg FW)
*W (day/kg FW)
Bamilk value was calculated by using the correlation equation 'with K^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K,,w
value that is provided in this table: ^
Bafcef value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
B-3-1 1
B-3-10
3.98E-09
1.26E-08
A-3-375
-------
TABLE A-3-102
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ETHYLENE OXIDE (75-21-8)
(Page 3 of 3)
{•ammeter
Bafefk (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
tfoufcta (day/kg FW)
-8CF**
(L*kg FW tissue)
B^,A(IAgFW)
BSAFjbk (unitless)
Reference and Explanation ^ ^ ; ;• •
Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals (Continued)
Baimk value was calculated by using thethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
anomultiplying it with the Babe^ value (see section A3 .4.2 of Appendix A-3).
Bo,— value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
Bad>um value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A3.4.3 of Appendix A-3).
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCFf,h value calculated using the correlation equation with Km
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
-
-
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
1.52E-08
3.98E-06
9.94E-09
3.48E-01
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
tyD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
J?/C (mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
Gugto')'1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-'
-
U.S. EPA (1997c)
-
U.S. EPA (1997c)
U.S. EPA (1997c)
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
ND
1.02E+00
ND
l.OE-04
3.5E-01
Note:
NA «• Not applicable
ND » No data available
AH parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-376
-------
TABLE A-3-103
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE (117-81-7)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation ' | Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
Tm(K)
Vp (atm)
5(mg/L)
//"(atm-m'/mol)
A,(cm2/s)
£)w(cm2/s)
JiT^, (imitless)
^(mL/g)
^(cmVg)
/^(L/Kg)
MXcmVg)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman( 1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Vp value cited in Montgomery and Welkom (1991).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1992a).
H value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1 994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). .
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kof that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate/^,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
jfisL, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0{. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 m suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kdbs value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdts value was calculated by
using the Km value that is provided in this table.
-
-
-
.
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4;B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
-Syaliie:%
390.54
218.1
1.12E-11
at25°C
(liquid)
3.96E-01
1.10E-08
1.32E-02
4.22E-06 -
1.60E+05
1.11E+09
1.11E+03
8.33E+03
4.44E+03
A-3-377
-------
TABLE A-3-103
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE (117-81-7)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
. Reference and Explanation . •'•; '•-.'.-','
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life hi soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
Equations
• ''•' Value;-"' .:;
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
1.10E+01
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
-RCF
. uglg DW plant .
* UglmL soil water'
tftg/g DW plant \
Wffe s°tf
^Mlg DW plant^
Uglg soil
(Pgtg DW plant}
ftg/g soil
tUglg DW plant*
ftg/g air
BVj^/gDW plant.
t^g/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982V Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in mis table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Br^ptg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
hi this table.
Br^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited hi
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided hi this table.
Br&age value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided hi this table.
Bv^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and K^, values that are provided hi this table.
Bvf*tg? value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and //that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM values that are provided hi this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
2.37E+03
2.13E+00
3.80E-02
3.80E-02
1.77E+06
1.77E+06
A-3-378
-------
TABLE A-3-103
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR BIS(2-ETHYLHEXYL)PHTHALATE (117-81-7)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
4 j«
Reference and Explanation " '
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamilt (day/kg FW)
Ea^f (day/kg FW)
Baport (day/kg FW)
Baeggs (day/kg FW)
BflUtoto (day/kg FW)
BCFm
(L/kg, FW tissue)
&4F^,(L/kgFW)
BSAFfch (unitless)
Bamllk value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Bateef value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Baport value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ealxtf value.
Baegg value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A^-that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided m this table.
Bacuchn value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
-
BAFs were used for compounds with a log Km value above 4.0, as cited in U.S. EPA
(1995b). BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying a food chain
multiplier (FCM) with a geometric mean of various laboratory measured BCFs
obtained from various experimental studies cited in U.S. EPA (1998). FCMs were
obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc)— See Appendix A-3.
-
Equations -
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Value
1.27E-03
4.03E-03
4.88E-03
1.27E+00
3.18E-03
NA
3.60E+02
NA
Health Benchmarks
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
fl/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
U.S.EPA (1997b)
U.S.EPA (1997b)
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
Calculated from Oral CSF using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
Value based on Oral CSF assuming route-to-route extrapolation.
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
2.00E-02
1.40E-02
7.00E-02
4.00E-06
1.4E-02
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-379
-------
TABLE A-3-104
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR FLUORANTHENE (206-44-0)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MF(g/mole)
r«CK)
yp(a.tia)
S(mg/L)
#(atnvmVmol)
jD,(cmVs)
A,(cmVs)
/^(unltless)
^(mL/g)
J&UcmVg)
&C(L/Kg)
JWjXcmVg)
Reference and Explanation 1 Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1 994c).
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Devalue was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kof that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 m soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Km value that is provided in
this table.
Kd.,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kol. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the KK value that is provided in this table.
Kdi, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in '
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment'. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the K^. value that is provided in this table..
-
-
-
. -
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18;B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
Value
202.26
383.1
1.07E-08
at25°C
(solid)
2.32E-01
9.33E-06
2.75E-02
7.18E-06
1.21E+05
4.91E+04
4.91E+02
3.68E+03
1.96E+03
A-3-380
-------
TABLE A-3-104
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR FLUORANTHENE (206-44-0)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter I - Reference and Explanation ,
Equations
Value '
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
RCF
, ng/g DW plant .
" uglmL soil water'
,/J-g/g DW plant •.
pglg soil
,H-glg DW plant ,
Uglg soil
^glg DW plant ^
Hg/g soil
ffj'g/g DW plant.
Uglg air
^glg DW plant ^
pg/g air
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Mackay,
Shiu,andMa(1992).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that
are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
5.75E-01
0.992042
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in tnis table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroatve. value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in tiiis table.
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km, value that
is provided in this table.
Br^age value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided in this table.
Bvforagf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and //that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.92E+03
3.90E+00
4.46E-02
4.46E-02
1.56E+03
1.56E+03
A-3-381
-------
T.ABLE A-3-104
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR FLUORANTHENE (206-44-0)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation '--"3.-'::.^>'->;.-:-' ••.'.:^ ''--;;.";
;,;,;Eqnations"::v
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^a (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Bafttk (day/leg FW)
Batfp (day/kg FW)
£4^ (day/kg FW)
BCFM,
(Ukg FW tissue)
Atf^OJkgFW)
BSAFjj, (unitless)
Bamat value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Bataf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^j. value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Ba^g, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Caluornia EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^, value
that is provided in this table.
BaMettn value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
-
BAFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value above 4.0, as cited in U.S. EPA
(1995b). BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying a food chain
multiplier (FCM) with an estimated BCF. BCFs were estimated using the
correlation equation obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980).
FCMs were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc) — See Appendix A-3.
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
9.65E-04
3.05E-03
3.69E-03
9.65E-01
2.41E-03
NA
1.57E+04
NA
Health Benchmarks
SJD (nig/kg/day)
OralCSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
/?/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
Cug/m1)-' ,
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-'
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
4.0E-02
ND
1.4E-01
ND
ND
Note:
NA- Not applicable
ND* No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-382
-------
TABLE A-3-105
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR FLUORENE (86-73-7)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
-> , • Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
rm(K)
Vp(aim)
S(mg/L)
.//(atnvmVmol)
A,(cm2/s)
A,(cm2/s)
K^, (unitless)
^(mL/g)
AT4(cm3/g)
y&/w(L/Kg)
*tffa(cm3/g)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1992a).
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1992a).
H value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MF, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d)
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d)
Km value cited hi U.S. EPA (1995b)
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate At?,,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the K^. value that is provided in
this table.
KeL, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with KK that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction oF 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kdbs value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 hi bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Equations
Value
~
. -
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
•
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
166.22
389.1
1.08E-09
at25°C
(solid)
1.90E400
9.41E-08
3.63E-02
7.88E-06
1.47E+04
7.71E403
7.71E+01
5.78E+02
3.08E+02
A-3-383
-------
TABLE A-3-105
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR FLUORENE (86-73-7)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter | Reference and Explanation ; ^ | "Eijuatipus A! ^
••,'JtiJ*fr£
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
fag (year)'1
Fv(unitless)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited hi Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited hi Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that
are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a liquid
phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8;B-4-l;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
4.22E+00
0.934896
Biorransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
. ngtg DW plant .
'ngtmL soil water
,^g/g DW plant \
Uglg soil
.Hgfg DW plant ^
pg/g soil
^g/g DW plant ^
pglg soil
tUglg DW plant \
Uglg air
,(*g/g DW plant,.
(tg/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Brrvlvtf value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table.
Br^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
Brf..,^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in "Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KV, value that is provided in this table.
fiv^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and /fthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and VigM (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KV* values that are provided in this table.
•BVfc™. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
citeam Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and K^ values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
3.83E402
4.96E+00
1.51E-01
1.51E-01
1.63E+04
1.63E+04
A-3-384
-------
TABLE A-3-105
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR FLUORENE (86-73-7)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation s '
Equations
Valne
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamm (day/kg FW)
^^(day/kgFW)
Bapork (day/kg FW)
Baegg (day/kg FW)
5acWcto, (day/kg FW)
(L/kf FW tissue)
5^(L/kgFW)
BSAFf,h (unitless)
5aMtft value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with AT^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Bapork value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Batx^ value.
Bo* value was calculated by using the correlation equation with AT^, that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
Bachicta, value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba,^ value.
-
BAFs were used for compounds with a log Km value above 4.0, as cited in U.S. EPA
(1995b). BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying a food chain
multiplier (FCM) with an estimated BCF. BCFs were estimated using the
correlation equation obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980).
FCMs were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc) — See Appendix A-3.
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
1.17E-04
3.70E-04
4.48E-04
1.17E-01
2.92E-04
NA
1.20E+03
NA
Health Benchmarks
RjD (mg/kg/day)
Ora/ CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
^/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
U.S.EPA (1997b)
-
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 m3/day and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
-
_
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
4.00E-02
ND
1.40E-01
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-385
-------
TABLE A-3-106
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR FORMALDEHYDE (50-00-0)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MF(g/mole)
rm(K)
yp(a.tm)
5(mg/L)
/f(atnvmVmol)
A,(cmVs)
A,(anVs)
^(unitless)
/^(mL/g)
J&4(cmVg)
Ai/w(L/Kg)
ATrf,, (cmVg)
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b)
//value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
DB value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1 994d)
£>w value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d)
K^ value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b)
Kot value was calculated, by using the correlation equation with K^ for phthalates
and PAIIs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans,
cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). KK value was calculated by using the recommended Km
value that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in
this table.
Kd.,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
Kdi, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 hi bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
Equations - | Value
-
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
—
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
30.03
365.1
5.10E+00
at25°C
(solid)
5.50E+05
2.78E-04
5.00E-01
1.74E-05
2.20E+00
2.62E+00
2.62E-02
1.96E-01
1.05E-01
A-3-386
-------
TABLE A-3-106
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR FORMALDEHYDE (50-00-0)
(Page 2 of 3)
T
Reference and Exolanation
T
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991)
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
3.61E-K)!
(unitless)
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that
are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
DW plant -
soil water
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
B-2-10
6.73E+00
Br,
rootveg
Brrootxg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kdt value provided
hi tBis*table.
B-2-10
/j.g/g soil
2.57E+02
Bra.
,f*g/g DWplant^
fj.glg soil
Br value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided hi this table.
B-2-9
2.46E401
Br,
forage
soil
Brf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for above
ground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
B-3-9
2.46E+01
Bva,
air
Bv value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reduchig this value by a fector of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values mat are provided in this table.
B-2-8
4.65E-04
Bv,
forage
By
ci
/j.g/g air
ivf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, and H that is
ifeef m Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); andBacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and VigSi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector oflOO.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KW values that are provided in this table.
B-3-8
4.65E-04
A-3-387
-------
TABLE A-3-106
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR FORMALDEHYDE (50-00-0)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Ba^d&y/kgFW)
BaiHf (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
flcUfeu, (day/kg FW)
SCFki
(UkgFW tissue)
MF^i (L/kg FW)
BSAFju, (unitless)
Reference and Explanation '•^'•^.^'••X;^;/-; ^•••i:;/;*i
:"-'-;':''B)fltifttidniS'J': *'• -
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
BaM value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Bataf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^j. value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Uow value.
£a«, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
B"dktm value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF values were geometric mean laboratory or field derived
values obtained from various literature sources cited in U.S. EPA (1998V— See
Appendix A-3.
-
-
Health Benchmarks
RJD (lag/kg/day)
OralCSF
(mg/kg/day)-'
iyC(mg/m*)
Inhalation URF
fag/m')-'
Inhalation CSF
(mg/k^day)-'
U.S.EPA (1997b)
Calculated from Inhalation URFvsmg an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human
body weight of 70 kg.
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
U.S.EPA(1997b)
U.S.EPA (1997c)
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
''••^VWite^' "
1.75E-08
5.53E-08
6.69E-08
1.75E-05
4.36E-08
1.07E+00
NA
NA
2.00E-01
4.50E-02
7.00E-01
1.30E-05
4.50E-02
Note:
NA » Not applicable
ND •• No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-388
-------
TABLE A-3-107
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR FORMIC ACID (64-18-6)
(Page 1 of 3)
' Parameter
Reference and Esplanatioii^
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MfF(g/mole)
U.S. EPA (1995b)
46.03
U.S. EPA (1995b)
282.0
Vp(atm)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b)
5.40E-02
at25°C
(liquid)
S(mg/L)
lvalue cited in U.S. EPA (1995b)
1.00E-H)6
H value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl,
and Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was
calculated by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
2.49E-06
A,(cm2/s)
D value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
2.22E-01
£>w(cmVs)
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
B-4-20
1.71E-05
(unitless)
Km value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b)
2.90E-01
K value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for
pnthalates and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs,
dioxins, and furans, cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). Koc value was calculated by
using the recommended K^ value that is provided in this table.
5.39E+00
Measured organic carbon in soil, specL»~ -« u.™ »„„——, -
calculate Kd,, because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic
carbon in soil. Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the K,, value
that is provided in this table.
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-3-3; B-3-4;
B-3-5; B-3-6;
B-4-3; B-4-4;
B-4-5; B-4-6;
B-4-10;B-4-ll
5.39E-02
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in Cf.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in
suspended sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific
to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value vanes,
depending on the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment.
Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by using the Kac value that is provided
in this table.
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
4.04E-01
Kdts (cm3/g)
Kdb value was calculated by using the correlation equation with.^ that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending
on the fraction of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value
was calculated by using the Kac value that is provided in this table.
B-4-16; B-4-25
2.16E-01
A-3-389
-------
TABLE A-3-107
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR FORMIC ACID (64-18-6)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
kg (year)'1
Fv (unitlcss)
RCF
, Hgfg DW plant .
^(jg/mL soil water'
^weft**
,ttg/g DW plant.
(*g/g soil
*W
.Uglg DW plant.
pg/g soil
B^
^Uglg DW plant.
Hgtg soil
B,V
,(jg/g DW plant.
Uglg air
?HbM*«
rf*11^*
^glg DWplant^
(jg/g air
Reference and Explanation ' ' ^ ; "j Eonaiions
" Valu^1''"''
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in
Howard, Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977).
Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided
in the table.
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-1; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight
basis by using a moisture content of 87 percent.
^/MPV value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd. value
provided in this table.
5r« value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
m Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
s!forfsf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the K^ value that is provided in this table.
Bvef value was calculated by using the correlation equation with AL, and #that
is cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira,
Gaggi, Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a
factor of 100. No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce
and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C,
by using the Hand Km values that are provided in this table.
that is cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci,°Cerejeira,
Gaggi, Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a
factor of 100. No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce
and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C,
by using the H and Km values that are provided in this table.
~~
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
3.61E+01
1.000000
6.40E+00
1.19E+02
7.92E+01
7.92E+01
6.02E-03
6.02E-03
A-3-390
-------
TABLE A-3-107
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR FORMIC ACID (64-18-6)
(Page 3 of 3)
Pso*QM6tC5*
Bamttt (day/kg FW)
5aw(day/kgFW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
5aear(day/kgFW)
Ua^ (day/kg FW)
fiCFjw
(L/kg FW tissue)
AUkOL/kgFW)
BSAFfrk (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
£am,jt value was calculated by using the correlation .equation with^, that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using
the KU, value that is provided in this table.
Ba^cf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
Ba—t value was calculated by using the. fet content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Ba value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is
citecf'in California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
•Bacwdto value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef
(15/19) and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs Were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCFM value calculated using the correlation equation with
K^ obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980)— See Appendix
A-3.
_ ' ' • •
_ • • •
Health Benchmarks
RJD (mg/kg/day)
Ora/ CSF (mg/kg/day)'1
JZ/CCmg/m3)
Inhalation URF (^g/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mE/kff/day)
U.S. EPA (1997c)
_ •• • -
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
'-- . , -
- '
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
' C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
Value
2.30E-09
7.28E-09
8.82E-09
2.30E-06
5.75E-09
2.30E-01
NA
NA
2.00E400
ND
7.00E+00 •:
ND
ND
Note: '
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-391
-------
TABLE A-3-108
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HEPTACHLORODIBENZO(P)DIOXIN (35822-46-9)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties
MFCg/mole)
rffl(K)
J>(atm)
S(mg/L)
/y(atm-m3/mol)
D.CcmVs)
£>w(cmVs)
#„, (urutless)
tf«(mL/g)
A'4(cm'/g)
&k(L/Kg)
&4,(cmVg)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
Dtt value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dw value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
U.S. EPA (1992d)
KK value was calculated by using the correlation equation with AL. for dioxins
and furans that is cited in U.S. EPA (1994a) and U.S. EPA (1994c).
Recommended value was calculated by using the recommended Km value that is
provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K,c that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil.
Measured organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to
calculate Kdn because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic
carbon in soil. Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value
that is provided in this table.
KcL. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in
suspended sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific
to site conditions, should be used to calculate KdM because the value vanes,
depending on the fraction of organic carbon hi suspended sediment.
Recommended Kdm value was calculated by using the AL. value that is provided
in this table.
Kd,a value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdk, because the value varies depending
on the fraction of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the KK value that is provided in this table.
Utonations
Value
—
—
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
—
—
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
425.31
537.1
4.22E-14
at 25°C
(solid)
2.40E-06
7.50E-06
1.11E-02
3.89E-06
1.58E-H)8
9.77E+07
9.77E+05
7.33E+06
3.91E-H)6
A-3-392
-------
TABLE A-3-108
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HEPTACHLORODIBENZO(P)DIOXIN (35822-46-9)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
' " ^ * < • Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
fag- value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in
Mackay, Shiu, and Ma (1992).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values
mat are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
Equations
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-l;B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Value
1.09E-01
0.016157
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, /J.g/g DW plant ,
Hg/mL soil water
,yg/g DW plant .
Mg/g soil
,Hglg DW plant ^
pglg soil
(Mg/g DW plant )
Hg/g'soil
sfAg/g DW plant ^
pg/g air
(Mg/g DW plant )
fj.g/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight
basis by using a moisture content of 87 percent.
Br^y,, value was calculated by dividing the RCF Value with the Kd, value
provided in this table.
Br __ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with/sT^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
Brforasf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was obtained from Lorber (1995). No distinction was made between
aboveground produce and forage.
Bvforagf value was obtained from Lorber (1995). No distinction was made
between aboveground produce and forage'.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
4.79E+05
4.90E-01
7.05E-04
7.05E-04
3.50E+05
3.50E+05
A-3-393
-------
TABLE A-3-108
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1^^,4,6,7,8-HEPTACHLORODIBENZO(P)DIOXIN (35822-46-9)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
BamA (day/kg FW)
Ba^f (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
j&w
(L/RgFW tissue)
(iJcgFW tissue)
£CF^*
(L/kg FW tissue)
£4FM(L/kgFW)
flS«3fc»
(unitlcss, lipid based)
U.S.EPA(1995a)
jB<7j^ value was calculated by increasing fia^ values by a factor of 5.43, as
discussed in Section A3.3.14.
Ba^t value was calculated by increasing BamM values by a factor of 6.57, as
discussed in Section A3.3.15.
Bam value was calculated by multiplying the BCF value for chicken eggs by a
chicken soil consumption rate of 0.02 kg (DW)/day (See Appendix A-3). BCF
value for eggs was obtained from Stephens, Petreas, and Hayward (1995) for the
high exposure chicken group.
^<%i». value was calculated by multiplying the BCF value for chicken by a
chicken soil consumption rate of 0.02 kg (DW)/day (See Appendix A-3). BCF
value for chicken was obtained from Stephens, Petreas, and Hayward (1995) for
the high exposure chicken group.
-
-
U.S. EPA (1994a)
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
l.OOE-03
5.4E-03
6.57E-03
2.55E-02
8.58E-03
NA
NA
5.00E-03
Other Parameters
7JEF(unitless)
U.S.EPA(1994a)
-
0.01
Health Benchmarks
Ort7/CSF(mg/kg/day)-'
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
B/D (mg/kg/day)
Inhalation DKF(^g/m3)-'
/?/C(mg/rn3)
-
-
-
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
ND .
ND
ND
ND
ND
Note;
NA m Not Applicable
ND - No Data Available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-394
-------
TABLE A-3-109
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HEPTACHLORODIBENZO(P)FURAN (67562-39-4)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MF(g/mole)
r.(K)
Vp(atia)
S(mg/L)
/f(atnvm3/mol)
A, (cm2/s)
A,(cm2/s)
£„„, (unitless)
«cc(mL/g)
KiUcmVg)
*yw(L/Kg)
«4,(cmVg)
' Reference and Explanation ' '' • •
Chemical/Physical Properties
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
Da value was calculated by using Equation A-3-2. Recommended value was
calculated by using the Mffaad Da values that are provided in the tables in
Appendix A-3 for 2,3,7,8-TCDF.
£>w value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
U.S. EPA (1992d)
J5L. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K— for dioxins
and furans that is cited in U.S. EPA (1994a) and U.S. EPA (1994c).
Recommended value was calculated by using the recommended Km value that is
provided in this table.
Kds value was calculated by using the correlation equation with KK that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil.
Measured organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to
calculate Kd,, because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic
carbon in soil. Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the KK value
that is provided in this table.
Kd^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with/T that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in
suspended sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific
to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value vanes,
depending on the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment.
Recommended Kdm value was calculated by using the Kac value that is provided
in this table.
Kdis value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd,,,, because the value varies depending
on the fraction of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value
was calculated by using the K^. value that is provided in this table.
Equations " L - Value >
-
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
""•
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
409.31
509.1
1.75E-13
at25°C
(solid)
1.35E-06
5.30E-05
1.55E-02
3.99E-06
8.32E+07
5.13E+07
5.13E405
3.85E+06
2.05E+06
A-3-395
-------
TABLE A-3-109
CHEMICAJUSPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HEPTACHL6RODffiENZO(P)FURAN (67562-39-4)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation •' <
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)"1
Fv (unitless)
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in
Mackay, Shiu, and Ma (1992).
Fv value was calculated by using equations" cited hi Junge (1977) arid Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-1 ;B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-1 2; B-5-1
3.57E-01
0.034709
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, Vg/gDW plant . •
* UglmL soil -water'
,Hg!g DW plant.
Itg/g soil
,ftg/g DW plant.
Uglg soil
,t*gtg DW plant.
Uglg soil
.figtg DW plant.
Uglg air
rt*gfg DW plant.
pglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight
basis by using a moisture content of 87 percent
Brnoy,, value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value
provided in this table.
\
Br value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
hi Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the Kw value that is provided in this table.
Brt*esf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was. calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
Bv^-value was obtained from Lorber (1995). No distinction was made between
aboveground produce and forage. '
Bvfangc value was 'obtained from Lorber (1995). No distinction was made
between aboveground produce and forage.
B-2-1Q
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
2.91E+05
5.68E-01
1.02E-03
1.02E-03,
4.40E+05
4.40E+05
A-3-396
-------
TABLE A-3-109
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HEPTACHLORODIBENZO(P)FURAN (67562-39-4)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter >
Reference and Explanation *
Equations
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamllt (day/kg FW)
^^(day/kgFW)
Baport (day/kg FW)
(iJcg FW tissue)
•£aS*totei,, .
(L/kg FW tissue)
(L/kg^FW tissue)
A^OL/kgFW)
«WJ%
(unitless, lipid based)
7EF(unitless)
U.S. EPA (1995a)
Babaf value was calculated by increasing Bamllk values by a factor of 5.43, as
discussed in Section A3.3.14.
Bapork value was calculated by increasing Bamllt values by a factor of 6.57, as
discussed in Section A3.3. 15.
Baege value was calculated by multiplying the BCF value for chicken eps by a
chicken soil consumption rate of 0.02 kg (DW)/day (See Appendix A-3). BCF
value for eggs was obtained from Stephens, Petreas, and Hayward (1995) for the
high exposure chicken group.
Bichtchm value was calculated by multiplying the BCF value for chicken by a
chicken soil consumption rate of 0.02 kg (DW)/day (See Appendix A-3). BCF
value for chicken was obtained from Stephens, Petreas, ana Hayward (1995) for
the high exposure chicken group.
-
_
U.S. EPA (1994a)
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Value
l.OOE-03
5.43E-03
6.57E-03
2.09E-02
7.04E-03
NA
NA
5.00E-03
Other Parameters
U.S. EPA (1994a)
-
0.01
Health Benchmarks
Oral CSF (mg/kg/day)'1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
RJD (mg/kg/day)
Inhalation URF (jigfrn3)'1
RfC (mg/m3)
-
_
-
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not Applicable
ND = No Data Available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-397
-------
TABLE A-3-110
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1,23,4,7,8,9-HEPTACHLORODIBENZO(P)FURAN (55673-89-7)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
W(g/mole)
Fm(K)
Vp(atia)
5(mg/L)
//(atnvmVmol)
A.(cms/s)
A»(cmVs)
/^(unitless)
Jk(«MB)
A'4(cmVg)
A'^OTKg)
A'4.(cm'/g)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
Homologue group average value obtained from U.S. EPA (1994a).
U.S. EPA (1994a)
D, value was calculated by using Equation A-3-2. Recommended value was
calculated by using the .MFand D. values that are provided in the tables in
Appendix A-3 for 2,3,7,8-TCDF.
Dw value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Homologue group average value obtained from U.S. EPA (1992d).
KK value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ for dioxins
and fiirans that is cited in U.S. EPA (1994a) and U.S. EPA (1994c).
Recommended value was calculated by using the recommended Km value that is
provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with KL. that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 hi soil.
Measured organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to
calculate Kda because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic
carbon in soil. Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Koc value
that is provided in this table.
KcL, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in
suspended sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific
to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value vanes,
depending on the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment.
Recommended Kdm value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided
in this table.
KcL, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies depending
on the fraction of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value
was calculated by using the KK value that is provided in this table.
-
--
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
"***
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
409.31
494:1
1.41E-13
at25°C '
(solid)
1.40E-06
5.30E-05
1.55E-02
3.99E-06
8.32E+07
5.13E+07
5.13E+05
3.85E+06
2.05E+06
A-3-398
-------
TABLE A-3-110
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HEPTACHLORODIBENZO(P)FURAN (55673-89-7)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation '» „ \-. '
'Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
ksg value was calculated using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Mackay,
Shiu,andMa(1992).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-l;B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
3.57E-01
0.020142
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
^ yglg DW plant .
l^glmL soil water
DJJ
Drrootveg
(Mg/g DW plant.
Hg/g soil
Brag
,/j.g/g DW plant.
fj.g/g soil
Brfonise
,jj.glg DW plant.
pglg soil
Bvag
,/j.g/g DW plant.
Hg/g air
Bvforage
,yg/g DW plant.
pglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited
in Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight
basis by using a moisture content of 87 percent.
Brmotm value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value
provided in this table.
Br a, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
Brf,ragf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
cited m Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was obtained from Lorber (1995). No distinction was made between
aboveground produce and forage.
Bvfrag, value was obtained from Lorber (1995). No distinction was made
between aboveground produce and forage.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
2.91E+05
5.68E-01
1.02E-03
1.02E-03
4.40E+05
4.40E+05
A-3-399
-------
TABLE A-3-110
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HEPTACHLORODIBENZO(P)FURAN (55673-89-7)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
flo.ya (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
*
-------
TABLE A-3-111
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR HEPTACHLOR (76-44-8)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
r»(K)
Vp(atin)
S(mgfL)
/T(atm-m3/mol)
A,(cm2/s)
£>w(cm2/s)
A^, (unitless)
^(rnL/g)
fi4(ons/g)
M»(L/Kg)
XiUcmVg)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
//value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dv value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd^. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value was
calculated by using the K^ value that is provided hi this table.
Kdfc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon hi bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction hi bottom sediment. Recommended Kdts value was calculated by using the
Koc value that is provided in this table.
~
~
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18;
B-4-24
B-4-16;
B-4-25
373.35
368.1
4.29E-07
at25°C
(solid)
2.73E+01
5.87E-06
1.12E-02
5.69E-06
1.04E+05
9.53E+03
9.53E-H)!
7.15E+02
3.81E-H)2
A-3-401
-------
TABLE A-3-111
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR HEPTACHLOR (76-44-8)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
fag (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard
(1989-1993).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using S, Tm, and Vp values that
are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
Equations
Value
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
1.41E400
0.999718
Biorransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, uglg DW plant ,
' fig/mL soil water'
(t*g/g DW plant .
ftgfg soil
(Hg/g DW plant.
Uglg soil
{Hgfg DW plant.
l*g/g soil
,Hg/g DW plant.
Uglg air
fftgtg DW plant.
Hg/g air
.RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the AL, value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
•S'Vtwff value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table (see section A3.4.2 of Appendix A-3).
Br^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Br&a?st value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for abovegroud
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Bvae value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor oflOO.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KV, values that are provided in this table.
Bvfxfif value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
citedin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 2S°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided in this table.
"
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.70E+03
1.78E+01
4.89E-02
4.89E-02
2.09E+03
2.09E+03
A-3-402
-------
TABLE A-3-111
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR HEPTACHLOR (76-44-8)
(Page 3 of 3)
?J}l*$tD£€td*
• ' ' Reference and Explanation
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
fiamat (day/kg FW)
Ba^day/kgFW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
5aegg(day/kgFW)
AJcWdta, (day/kg FW)
*CFj»
(L/kgFW tissue)
AlFjaGVkgFW)
BSAFju, (unitless)
JSa^it value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
Ba^f value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
Ba~ri value was calculated by using thethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
ana multiplying it with the Baba,f value (see section A3.4.2 of Appendix A-3).
Bae~ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A^,, that is cited in
Cafifornia EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
B<*
-------
TABLE A-3-112
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE (1024-57-3)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
jWF(g/mole)
7"M(K)
*5>(atm)
S(mg/L)
.//(amvmVmol)
£>.(cmVs)
A,(cmVs)
ATw(unitless)
X«(mL/g)
J&4(cmVg)
Kd^QJKg)
ttUcmVg)
Reference and Explanation L> •
Chemical/Physical Properties
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1992a).
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1992a) .
# value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the Mw, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
DB value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
KK value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, for phthalates
and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans,
cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). Kx value was calculated by using the recommended K^
value that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kda
because the value vanes, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Km value that is provided in
this table.
Kd^, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to sue
conditions, should be used to calculate KdM because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the KK value that is provided in this table.
Kdjp value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kx that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon hi bottom sediment. Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by
using the KK value that is provided in this table.
-'•''' "Equations*"'' j '•^'•'Valiie '•*"'•
-
—
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
—
—
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18;B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
389.32
430.1
7.51E-12
at25°C
(solid)
2.68E-01
1.09E-08
1.32E-02
4.23E-06
5.62E404
7.18E+03
7.18E+01
5.38E+02
2.87E+02
A-3-404
-------
TABLE A-3-112
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR HEPTACHLOR EPOXTOE (1024-57-3)
(Page 2 of 3)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2;B-4-2
4.58E-01
7v (unitless)
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that
are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a liquid
phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
0.203415
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
DW plant .
" pglmL soil water'
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation withJ^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
B-2-10
1.06E+03
Brrao,e value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
B-2-10
xflgfe DW plant.
v -'-«ri/
n
1.48E+01
(Jug/g DWplant^
/j.g/g soil
Br value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in mis table.
B-2-9
6.96E-02
Br
foragf
ftg/g soil
&&„„ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided hi this table.
B-3-9
6.96E-02
Bva
DWplant
pg/g air
•)
Bv value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and .ffthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
B-2-8
5.86E405
Bv
forage
DW plant.
Bvf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, and H that is
cifecfin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaga,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector or 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values mat are provided in mis table.
B-3-8
5.86E+05
A-3-405
-------
TABLE A-3-112
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR HEPTACHLOR EPOXTOE (1024-57-3)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Bo*at (day/kg FW)
5ow(day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Jfo^ (day/kg FW)
&WU, (day/kg FW)
*C/?M.
(L/kgFW tissue)
a*FjW,(L/kgFW)
BSAFfo, (unitless)
Reference and Explanation ' ' \, ; ;-*;^ ^
^Qtidtions
Value ;
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamltk value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the XL,
value that is provided in this table.
Bciiaf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^f. value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Bate^ value.
2?a._ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
J&'etertoi value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
-
BAFs were used for compounds with a log Km value above 4.0, as cited in U.S. EPA
(1 995b). BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying a food chain
multiplier (FCM) with an estimated BCF. BCFs were estimated using the
correlation equation obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980)
FCMs were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc>— See Appendix A-3.
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Health Benchmarks
#D (mg/kg/day)
OoJCSF
jng/kg/day)'1
#C(mg/m')
'nitalation URF
(M&ta1)'1
'nhaJation CSF
(mg/kg/day)"'
U.S.EPA (1997b)
U.S.EPA (1997b)
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
U.S.EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997c)
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
4.47E-04
1.41E-03
1.71E-03
4.47E-01
1.12E-03
NA
5.88E+03
NA
1.30E-05
9.1E+00
4.6E-05
2.6E-03
9.1E+00
Note;
NA • Not applicable
ND - No data available
AH parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-406
-------
TABLE A-3-113
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1,2,3,4,7,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZO(P)DIOXIN (39227-28-6)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MF(g/mole)
Tm(K)
Fp(atm)
S(mg/L)
//(atm-mVmol)
A,(cm2/s)
Av(cm2/s)
KM, (unitless)
Koc(mL/g)
Kd,(cm3/g)
*4*(L/Kg)
MXcmVg)
Reference and Explanation
' Equations | Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
£>„ value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
U.S. EPA (1992d)
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K-, for dioxins
and furans that is cited in U.S. EPA (1994a; 1994c). Recommended value was
calculated by using the recommended K^ value that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc; that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil.
Measured organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to
calculate Kda because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic
carbon in soil. Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the K^. value
that is provided in this table.
Kdm value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in
suspended sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific
to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value vanes,
depending on the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment.
Recommended Kdm value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided
in this table.
Kdja value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate .fo^. because the value varies depending
on the fraction of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the K^. value that is provided hi this table.
_ . •
- . •
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
—
B-l-3;B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
,8-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3r4;B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
390.87
546.1
1.33E-13
at25°C
(solid)
4.40E-06
1.20E-05
1.15E-02
4.12E-06
6.17E+07
3.80E+07
3.80E+05
2.85E+06
1.52E+06
A-3-407
-------
TABLE A-3-113
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1,2,3,4,7,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZO(P)DIOXIN (39227-28-6)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)"1
Fv (unitless)
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in
Mackay, Shiu, and Ma (1992).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-1; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Value
1.09E-01
0.059645
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
* Ug/g DW plant .
*(tg/mL soil water'
Br,^
,(*glg DW plant.
pgtg soil
*«
*(tg/g DW plant \
Uglg soil
Brf"*t
.ftgtg DW plant.
l*g/g soil
*W
.Uglg DW plant.
Hg/g air
*W
^glg DW plant j
Hg/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight
basis by using a moisture content of 87 percent.
8?™,™* value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value
provided in this table.
Br value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the KO, value that is provided in this table.
BrJ^tsf va^ue was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
citedin Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
BVeg value was obtained from Lorber (1995). No distinction was made between
aboveground produce and forage.
•Bvj^g* value was obtained from Lorber (1995). No distinction was made
between aboveground produce and forage.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
2.31E+05
6.09E-01
1.22E-03
1.22E-03
4.50E405
4.50E+05
A-3-408
-------
TABLE A-3-113
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1,2,3,4,7,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZO(P)DIOXIN (39227-28-6)
(Page 3 of 3)
, Parameter
Bamllk (day/kg FW)
5aw(day/kgFW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
(L/kg FW tissue)
(L/kg? W tissue)
BCF^ ..
(L/kgFW tissue)
AlFjwOLfltgFW)
jRaiFjz*
(unitless, lipid based)
7EF(unitless)
'Reference and Explanation ' - ,
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
U.S. EPA (1995a)
Ba,^ value was calculated by increasing Bamllk values by a factor of 5.43, as
discussed in Section A3 .3. 14.
Baport value was calculated by increasing Bamilk values by a factor of 6.57, as
discussed in Section A3. 3. 15.
Baees, value was calculated by multiplying the BCF value for chicken eggs by a
chicken soil consumption rate of 0.02 kg (DW)/day (See Appendix A-3). BCF
value for eggs was obtained from Stephens, Petreas, and Hayward (1995) for the
high exposure chicken group.
Bachicha, value was calculated by multiplying the BCF value for chicken by a
chicken soil consumption rate of 0.02 kg (DW)/day (See Appendix A-3). BCF
value for chicken was obtained from Stephens, Petreas, and Hayward (1995) for
the high exposure chicken group.
- ,
.
U.S. EPA (1994a)
< Equations
Value
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
6.00E-03
3.26E-02
3.94E-02
4.53E-02
4.03E-02
NA
NA
4.00E-02
Other Parameters
U.S. EPA (1994a)
~
0.10
Health Benchmarks
Oral CSF (mg/kg/day)'1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Inhalation URF O/g/m3)'1
5/C(mg/m3)
-
-
-
-
- '
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not Applicable
ND = No Data Available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-409
-------
TABLE A-3-114
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1,2,3,6,7,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZO(P)DIOXIN (57653-85-7)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MT(g/mole)
rm(K)
^p(atm)
5(mg/L)
//(atnvm'/mol)
jD.tcmVs)
AXcmVs)
/^(unitless)
tfw(mL/g)
Kd, (ctnVg)
j&kOJKg)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S.EPA(1994a)
Homologue group average value obtained from U.S. EPA (1994a).
U.S.EPA(1994a)
DB value was calculated by using Equation A-3-2. Recommended value was
calculated by using the MTand D, values that are provided in the tables in
Appendix A-3 for 2,3,7,8-TCDD.
£>„ value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Homologue group average value obtained from U.S. EPA (1992d).
KM value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ for dioxins
and furans that is cited in U.S. EPA (1994a) and U.S. EPA (1994c).
Recommended value was calculated by using the recommended K^, value that is
provided in this table.
Kd. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil.
Measured organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to
calculate Kdp because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic
carbon in soil. Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value
that is provided in this table.
KeLy value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in
suspended sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific
to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value vanes,
depending on the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment.
Recommended KdM value was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided
in this table.
-
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
—
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
390.87
558.1
4.74E-14
at25°C
(solid)
4.40E-06
1.20E-05
1.15E-02
4.12E-06
1.78E+07
1.10E+07
1.10E+05
8.22E+05
A-3-410
-------
TABLE A-3-114
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1,2,3,6,7,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZO(P)DIOXIN (57653-85-7)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation " < ' :
Equations | Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Kdi,, (cmVg)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Kdps value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^o- that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 hi bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies depending
on the fraction of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
ksg value assumed to be the same as the ksg value calculated for 1,2,3,4,7,8-
HexaCDD. ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as
cited hi Mackay, Shiu, and Ma (1992).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid phase value before being used hi the calculations.
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-l;B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-1; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
4.39E+05
1.09E-01
0.028857
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, /J.g/g DW plant ,
UglmL soil water
"^rootveg
pg/g soil
,/*g/g DW plant-.
fj,g/g soil
Brforage
,jj.glg DW plant \
/j.g/g soil
^g/g DWplant^
Uglg air
,/tg/g DW plant.
pg/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
hi Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^, value
that is provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight
basis by using a moisture content of 87 percent.
Br^y value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value
provided in this table.
Br«, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with AT^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided hi this table.
Brf>ragf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the KM, value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was obtained from Lorber (1995). No distinction was made between
aboveground produce and forage.
Bvfarage value was obtained from Lorber (1995). No distinction was made
between aboveground produce and forage.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9 ,
B-2-8
B-3-8
8.88E+04
8.10E-01
2.50E-03
2.50E-03
4.50E+05
4.50E+05
A-3-411
-------
TABLE A-3-114
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1,2,3,6,7,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZO(P)DIOXIN (57653-85-7)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference anil Explanation
Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^i (dayykg FW)
Bfiw
(Tukg FW tissue)
(L$g?W tissue)
BGFjw
(LfcgFW tissue)
JtfFjwOL/kgFW)
££4F/t«A
(unitless, lipid based)
U.S. EPA (1995a)
Ba^ value was calculated by increasing Bamllt values by a factor of 5.43, as
discussed in Section A3 .3.14.
Bapork value was calculated by increasing Bamlllc values by a factor of 6.57, as
discussed in Section A3.3.15.
Ba^ value was calculated by multiplying the BCF value for chicken eggs by a
chicken soil consumption rate of 0.02 kg (DW)/day (See Appendix A-3). BCF
value for eggs was obtained from Stephens, Petreas, and Hayward (1995) for the
high exposure chicken group.
•5°c«otoi value was calculated by multiplying the BCF value for chicken by a
chicken soil consumption rate of 0.02 kg (DW)/day (See Appendix A-3). BCF
value for chicken was obtained from Stephens, Petreas, ana Hayward (1995) for
the high exposure chicken group.
-
-
U.S. EPA (1994a)
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
5.00E-03
2.71E-02
3.29E-02
3.70E-02
2.57E-02
NA
NA
4.00E-02
Other Parameters
TEF (unitless)
U.S.EPA(1994a)
~
0.10
Health Benchmarks
Of at CSF (mg/kgVday)-1
Inhalation CSF
(nig/kg/day)'1
R/D (mg/kg/day)
Inhalation URF fag/m*)'1
jR/Cfmg/m*)
-
-
-
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Note:
NA « Not Applicable
ND - No Data Available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-412
-------
TABLE A-3-115
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1,2,3,7,8,9-HEXACHLORODIBENZO(P)DIOXIN (19408-74-3)
(Page 1 of 3)
,- Parameter >
MT(g/mole)
r«(K)
Pp(atm)
S"(mg/L)
/f(atnvm3/mol)
A,(cm2/s)
Av(cm2/s)
JK^ (unitless)
^(mL/g)
JBUcm'/g)
^(L/Kg)
JBUonVg)
5 " *' Reference and Explanation
* Equations
, Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
Homologue group average value obtained from U.S. EPA (1994a).
U.S.EPA (1994a)
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dv value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Homologue group average value obtained from U.S. EPA (1994a).
KO,. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ for dioxins
and furans that is cited hi U.S. EPA (1994a; 1994c). Recommended value was
calculated by using the recommended K^ value that is provided hi this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation vnihKoc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil.
Measured organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to
calculate Kda because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic
carbon in soil. Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Kol. value
that is provided in this table.
Kd^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in
suspended sediment. Measured organic carbon hi suspended sediment, specific
to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies,
depending on the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment.
Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided
in this table.
Kdt, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies depending
on the fraction of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdts value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
-
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
390.87
516.1
6.45E-14
at 25°C
(solid)
4.40E-06
1.20E-05
1.15E-02
4.12E-06
1.78E+07
1.10E407
1.10E+05
8.22E+05
4.39E+05
A-3-413
-------
TABLE A-3-115
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1,2,3,7,8,9-HEXACHLORODIBENZO(P)DIOXIN (19408-74-3)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
fog (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
ksg value was assumed to be the same as the ksg value for 1,2,3,4,7,8-
HexaCDD. ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as
cited in Mackay, Shiu, and Ma (1992). '
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid phase value before being used in the calculations.
Equations
Value
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-l;B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
1.09E-01
0.015299
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
^ Uglg DW plant .
figlmL soil water
,t*g/g DW plant*.
Uglg soil
^tglg DW plant ^
l*g/g soil
,l*glg DW plant \
ftg/g soil
/ H&l£ DW plant \
Uglg air
*Vt7glg DW plant.
Uglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight
basis by using a moisture content of 87 percent.
•&VOOPW value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value
provided in this table.
Br „, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the KM, value that is provided in this table.
Ufa value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is
cited in Travis and Anns (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the KM, value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was obtained from Lorber (1995). No distinction was made between
aboveground produce and forage.
BVfng, value was obtained from Lorber (1995). No distinction was made
between aboveground produce and forage.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
8.88E+04
8.10E-01
2.50E-03
2.50E-03
4.50E+05
4.50E+05
A-3-414
-------
TABLE A-3-115
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1,2,3,7,8,9-HEXACHLORODIBENZO(P)DIOXIN (19408-74-3)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter <
' Reference and Explanation
Equations .
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamak (day/kg FW)
fiaw(day/kgFW)
fia^ (day/kg FW)
SfiW
(L/kg FW tissue)
(L/^gfw tissue)
BCFw
(L/kg FW tissue)
A4F^(L/kgFW)
ASMFjM
(unitless, lipid based)
U.S. EPA (1995a)
Babaf value was calculated by increasing Bamttk values by a factor of 5.43, as
discussed in Section A3 .3 . 1 4.
Ba^ value was calculated by increasing Bamilk values by a factor of 6.57, as
discussed in Section A3 .3 . 1 5 .
Baeg- value was calculated by multiplying the BCF value for chicken eggs by a
chicken soil consumption rate of 0.02 kg (DW)/day (See Appendix A-3). BCF
value for eggs was obtained from Stephens, Petreas, and Hayward (1995) for the
high exposure chicken group.
.Batten value was calculated by multiplying the BCF value for chicken by a
chicken soil consumption rate of 0.02 kg (DW)/day (See Appendix A-3). BCF
value for chicken was obtained from Stephens, Petreas, ana Hayward (1995) for
the high exposure chicken group.
-
-
U.S. EPA (1994a)
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
5.00E-03
2.71E-02
3.29E-02
2.33E-02
1.39E-02
NA
NA
4.00E-02
Other Parameters
TEF (unitless)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
-
0.10
Health Benchmarks
Oral CSF (mg/kg/day)-'
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Inhalation URF (//g/m3)-1
tf/Cfag/m3)
-
-
-
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not Applicable
ND = No Data Available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-415
-------
TABLE A-3-116
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1^^,4,7,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZO(P)FURAN (70648-26-9)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MFfe/mole)
rm(K)
*£(atm)
S(mg/L)
#(atavmVmol)
£>.(cniVs)
A,(cmVs)
tfw (unitless)
A^(mL/g)
#4(cmVg)
A"
-------
TABLE A-3-116
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1,2,3,4,7,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZO(P)FURAN (70648-26-9)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter ^
Reference and Explanation ' •
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
KiUcmVg)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
RCF
( uglgDW plant )
^ IJ,glmL soil water'
Brro
-------
TABLE A-3-116
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1£,3,4,7,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZO(P)FURAN (70648-26-9)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
JfcUt (day/kg FW)
jBflw(dayflcgFW)
Ba^t (day/kg FW)
^soc
(L/kgFW tissue)
(L^fw tissue)
(L/kg*FW tissue)
A^ (L/kgFW)
-BS^
(unitlcss, iipid based)
Reference and Explanation
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
U.S.EPA(1995a)
Baiaf value was calculated by increasing Banilk values by a factor of 5.43, as
discussed in Section A3. 3. 14.
Bafork value was calculated by increasing Bamak values by a factor of 6.57, as
discussed in Section A3.3.15.
Ba,— value was calculated by multiplying the BCF value for chicken eggs by a
chicken soil consumption rate of 0.02 kg (DW)/day (See Appendix A-3). BCF
value for eggs was obtained from Stephens, Petreas, and Hayward (1995) for the
high exposure chicken group.
^flcwdtoi value was calculated by multiplying the BCF value for chicken by a
chicken soil consumption rate of 0.02 Kg (DW)/day (See Appendix A-3). BCF
value for chicken was obtained from Stephens, Petreas, ana Hayward (1995) for
the high exposure chicken group.
-
-
U.S. EPA (1994a)
Equations
Value
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
7.00E-03
3.80E-02
4.60E-02
4.51E-02
3.48E-02
NA
NA
4.00E-02
Other Parameters
7jE/-Xunitless)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
-
0.10
Health Benchmarks
Ofl/CS'F(mg/kg/day)-1
Mtalation CSF
(nig/kg/day)"1
tyD (mg/kg/day)
Inhalation URF fag/m3)-'
R/Cfag/m3)
-
-
-
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Note:
NA •" Not Applicable
ND - No Data Available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-418
-------
TABLE A-3-117
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1,2,3,6,7,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZO(P)FURAN (57117-44-9)
Reference and Explanation ' ~
Chemical/Physical Properties
/WF(g/mole)
T (K)
„«
S(mg/L)
^(atm-m'/mol)
A,(cm2/s)
Dw(cm2/s)
Km (unitless)
KQC (mL/§)
]£cl (cm /2)
JMw(L/Kg)
M, (cmVg)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
Da value was calculated by using Equation A-3-2. Recommended value was
calculated by using the MWanA. Da values that are provided in the tables in
Appendix A-3 for 2,3,7,8-TCDF.
£>w value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Homologue groupaverage value obtained from U.S. EPA (1992d)
K value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ for dioxins
and fiirans that is cited in U.S. EPA (1994a) and U.S. EPA (1994c).
Recommended value was calculated by using the recommended K^ value that is
provided in this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil.
Measured organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to
calculate Kda because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic
carbon in soil. Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in Cf.S. EPA (1 993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in
suspended sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific
to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value vanes,
depending on the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment.
Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided
in this table.
Kelt, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^. that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies depending
on the fraction of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdts value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
' Equations •
-
.
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
Value
374.87
505.1
2.89E-13
at25°C
(solid)
1.77E-05
6.10E-06
1.62E-02
4.23E-06
1.78E+07
1.10E+07
1.10E+05
8.22E+05
4.39E+05
A-3-419
-------
TABLE A-3-117
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1,23,6,7,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZO(P)FURAN (57117-44-9)
Parameter
fag (year)-'
Fv (unitless)
RCF
^ UglgDW plant .
ftg/rnL soil water
,Hg/g DW plant.
fig/g soil
,t*g/g DW plant.
Pglg soil
rUgtgDW plant.
Uglg soil
to*
^glg DW plant.
Uglg air
tt*gfg DW plant.
t*g/g air
(Page 2 of 3)
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Ksg value was assumed to be 0 due to a lack of data.
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-l;B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^,, that is cited
in Bnggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight
basis by using a moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroov& value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd value
provided in this table.
?r9KV3^& was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
B,rf»vgf value v/as calculated by using the correlation equation with K-., that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was obtained from Lorber (1995). No distinction was made between
aboveground produce and forage.
Bvprox, value was obtained from Lorber (1995). No distinction was made
between aboveground produce and forage.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
0.0
0.051501
8.88E404
8.10E-01
2.50E-03
2.50E-03
1.50E+05
1.50E+05
A-3-420
-------
TABLE A-3-117
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1,2,3,6,7,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZO(P)FURAN (57117-44-9)
Baallk (day/kg FW)
^(day/kg FW)
Bapork (day/kg FW)
Ba
(L/kg FW tissue)
(L/isgFW tissue)
(L/kfpW tissue)
S4F^(L/kgFW)
Jaifitfj*
(unitless, lipid based)
7EF(unitless)
Oral CSF (mg/kg/day)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
fl/D (mg/kg/day)
Inhalation URF (Mg/m3)"1
(Page 3 of 3)
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
U.S. EPA (1995a)
Itej^. value was calculated by increasing Bamllk values by a factor of 5.43, as
discussed in Section A3.3. 14.
.Ba^ value was calculated by increasing Bamttk values by a factor of 6.57, as
discussed in Section A3.3. 15.
Ba value was calculated by multiplying the BCF value for chicken eggs by a
chicken soil consumption rate of 0.02 kg (DW)/day (See Appendix A-3). BCF
value for eggs was obtained from Stephens, Petreas, and Hayward (1995) for the
high exposure chicken group.
Ba^k* value was calculated by multiplying the BCF value for chicken by a
chicken soil consumption rate of 0.02 kg (DW)/day (See Appendix A-3). BCF
value for chicken was obtained from Stephens, Petreas, and Hayward (1995) for
the high exposure chicken group.
- -
—
U.S. EPA (1994a)
Other Parameters
U.S. EPA (1994a)
Health Benchmarks
—
- -
_
_
Eanations
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
Value
6.00E-03
3.26E-02
3.94E-02
4.53E-02
3.56E-02
NA
NA
4.00E-02
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not Applicable
ND = No Data Available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-421
-------
TABLE A-3-118
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1,2,3,7,8,9-HEXACHLORODIBENZO(P)FURAN (72918-21-9)
Parameter
AflF(g/mole)
TW(K)
^(atra)
5"(mg/L)
/f(atnvmVmol)
A,(croVs)
JDw(cm%)
A"w (unitless)
A'^mL/g)
*4(c»Vg)
*yw(LffCg)
(Page 1 of 3)
Chemical/Physical Properties
U.S.EPA(1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S.EPA(1994a)
Homologue group average value obtained from U.S. EPA (1994a).
U.S.EPA(1994a)
Dg value was calculated by using Equation A-3-2. Recommended value was
calculated by using the MTand Da values that are provided in the tables in
Appendix A-3 for 2,3,7,8-TCDF.
£>„ value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (I996a).
Homologue group average value obtained from U.S. EPA (1992d).
Kx value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K for dioxins
and furans that is cited in U.S. EPA (1994a) and U.S. EPA (1994c).
Recommended value was calculated by using the recommended Km value that is
provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A^. that is cited
m U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil.
Measured organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to
calculate Kdp because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic
carbon in soil. Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the K value
that is provided in this table.
ISsL, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K.. that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in
suspended sediment Measured organic carbon hi suspended sediment, specific
p site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value vanes,
icpending on the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment.
lecommended Kdn value was calculated by using the Kac value that is provided
n this table.
_
_
-
..
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
..
—
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
374.87
519.1
2.37E-13
at25°C
(solid)
1.30E-05
l.OOE-05
1.62E-02
4.23E-06
1.78E+07
1.10E+07
1.10E+05
8.22E+05
A-3-422
-------
TABLE A-3-118
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1,2,3,7,8,9-HEXACHLORODIBENZO(P)FURAN (72918-21-9)
(Page 2 of 3)
'Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Kdt value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^ that is cited
hi U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies depending
on the fraction of organic carbon hi bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
B-4-16; B-4-25
4.39E+05
ksg (year)'1
Ksg value was assumed to be 0 due to a lack of data.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2;Br4-2 .
0.0
Fv (unitless)
Fv -value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-1;B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
0.057593
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, /j.g/g DW plant .
soil water
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight
basis by using a moisture content of 87 percent.
B-2-10
8.88E-H)4
,
fj,g/g DW plant )
pglg soil
Br^y,, value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value
provided in this table.
B-2-10
8.10E-01
Brat
[j.glg soil
Br value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the K^ value that is provided in this table.
B-2-9
2.50E-03
Br,
forage
soil
Brforas,e value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the KM, value that is provided in this table.
B-3-9
2.50E-03
Bvm
(M8fc DW plant }
/j.g/g air
Bvag value was obtained from Lorber (1995). No distinction was made between
aboveground produce and forage.
B-2-8
1.50E+05
A-3-423
-------
TABLE A-3-118
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1,2,3,7,8,9-HEXACHLORODIBENZO(P)FURAN (72918-21-9)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Biotranfer Factors for Plants (Continued)
*w
.Uglg DW plant ^
(*g/g air
&*«>,<,& value was obtained from Lorber (1995). No distinction was made
between aboveground produce and forage.
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
•9a«a (day/kg FW)
/?erw (day/kg FW)
Bafark (day/kg FW)
Bam
(UKgFW tissue)
(lJcg?W tissue)
BCFfj.
(L/kgFW tissue)
BAF^(UkgFW)
BSAKu,
(unitless, lipid based)
U.S. EPA (1995a)
Ba,^ value was calculated by increasing BamlK values by a factor of 5.43, as
discussed in Section A3.3.14.
Bafmk value was calculated by increasing BamM values by a factor of 6.57, as
discussed in Section A3.3.15.
Bam value was calculated by multiplying the BCF value for chicken eggs by a
chicken soil consumption rate of 0.02 kg (DW)/day (See Appendix A-3). BCF
value for eggs was obtained from Stephens, Petreas, and Hayward (1995) for the
high exposure chicken group.
BBd&to, value was calculated by multiplying the BCF value for chicken by a
chicken soil consumption rate of 0.02 kg (DW)/day (See Appendix A-3). BCF
value for chicken was obtained from Stephens, Petreas, and Hayward (1995) for
the high exposure chicken group.
-
-
U.S. EPA (1994a)
Equations
Value
B-3-8
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Other Parameters
TEF (unitless)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
—
1.50E+05
6.00E-03
3.26E-02
3.94E-02
ND
ND
NA
NA
4.00E-02
0.10
Health Benchmarks
Oral CSF (mg/kg/day)-1
Inhalation CSF
[mg/kg/day)-1
RJD (mg/kg/day)
Inhalation URF fag/m3)'*
^(mg/m3)
-
-
-
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
A-3-424
-------
TABLE A-3-119
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
2,3,4,6,7,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZO(P)FURAN (60851-34-5)
(Page 1 of 3)
l^suramctfii*
MF(g/mole)
Tm(K)
Vp (atm)
5(mg/L)
//'(atm-mVmol)
A,(cm2/s)
Dw(
-------
TABLE A-3-119
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
2^,4,6,7,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZO(P)FURAN (60851-34-5)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
£4. (cmVg)
fag (year)'1
Fv(unitless)
Kdt, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdb!, because the value varies depending
on the fiaction of organic carbon hi bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value
was calculated by using the KK value that is provided hi this table.
Ksg value was assumed to be 0 due to a lack of data.
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-l;B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
4.39E+05
0.0
0.054727
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, Hg/g DW plant ,
^ pglmL soil water'
Brn*ettt
,HglgDW plant ,
fjg/g soil
*w
^glg DWplant^
#g/g soil
Br^.
,}tg/g DW plant.
[iglg soil
AW
^glg DW plant)
(jgtg air
**W
.fjg/g DW plant.
ftgfg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^, value
that is provided hi this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight
basis by using a moisture content of 87 percent.
Brmt>u va^ue Vfzs calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value
provided in this table.
fir_, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the K^ value that is provided hi this table.
Br/»ye? va'ue was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the K^, value that is provided hi this table.
Bv^ value was obtained from Lorber (1995). No distinction was made between
aboveground produce and forage.
BVfins, value was obtained from Lorber (1995). No distinction was made
between aboveground produce and forage.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
8.88E+04
8.10E-01
2.50E-03
2.50E-03
1.50E+05
1.50E+05
A-3-426
-------
TABLE A-3-119
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
2,3,4,6,7,8-HEXACHLORODIBENZO(P)FURAN (60851-34-5)
(Page 3 of 3)
•* pju^md'd*
Bamm (day/kg FW)
Saw(day/kgFW)
Bfl^ (day/kg FW)
Sa_
(L/kg FW tissue)
(L^g*FW tissue)
(L/kg FW tissue)
AiF^OVkgFW)
fiSiF^
(unitless, lipid based)
7EF(unitless)
Oral CSF (mg/kg/day)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Inhalation URF Qj.g/m3)'1
RjC (mg/m3)
I "' - Reference and Explanation / " ' '"
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
U.S. EPA (1995a)
Ba^ef value was calculated by increasing Bamtlk values by a factor of 5.43, as
discussed in Section A3.3.14.
Ba^t value was calculated by increasing Bamllk values by a factor of 6.57, as
discussed in Section A3.3. 15.
Bae value was calculated by multiplying the BCF value for chicken eggs by a
chicken soil consumption rate of 0.02 kg (DW)/day (See Appendix A-3). BCF
value for eggs was obtained from Stephens, Petreas, and Hayward (1995) for the
high exposure chicken group.
Bachlcken value was calculated by multiplying the BCF value for chicken by a
chicken soil consumption rate of 0.02 Teg (DW)/day (See Appendix A-3V BCF
value for chicken was obtained from Stephens, Petreas, and Hayward (1995) for
the high exposure chicken group.
-
-
U.S. EPA (1994a)
Other Parameters
U.S. EPA (1994a)
Health Benchmarks
— • .'
-
-
-
-
iQnations * ,
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
Value
5.00E-03
2.71E-02
3.29E-02
2.11E-02
1.74E-02
NA
NA
4.00E-02
0.10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not Applicable
ND = No Data Available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-427
-------
TABLE A-3-120
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR HEXACHLORO-1,3-BUTADIENE
(PERCHLOROBUTADIENE) (87-68-3)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation j Equations
Value *
Chemical/Physical Properties
MP(g/mole)
rm(K)
J5?(atm)
5(mg/L)
tf(atovmVmol)
D.(cm%)
A,(cmJ/s)
A^(unitless)
A^CmL/g)
AV/,(cmVg)
ATi^CUKg)
A'd^cmVg)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (198.2), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S, EPA 1994d).
Dv value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
KK value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ for all
nonionizing organics exceptphthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). 1^ value was calculated by using the recommended K^ value
that is provided in this table.
Kd. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate^,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the K., value that is provided in
this table.
Kd value' was calculated by using the correlation equation with AT that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to sue
conditions, should be used to calculate Ac? because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^, value
was calculated by using the A^ value that is provided in this table.
Kdi, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Atf^, because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by using the
Kx value that is provided in this table.
~
-
-
~
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
.
—
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
260.76
252.1
2.33E-04
at 25°C
(liquid)
2.54E+00
2.39E-02
1.73E-02
7.33E-06
5.38E+04
6.94E+03
6.94E+01
5.20E+02
2.77E+02
A-3-428
-------
TABLE A-3-120
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR HEXACHLORO-1,3-BUTADIENE
(PERCHLOROBUTADIENE) (87-68-3)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
fog (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
, '* Reference and Explanation!
. Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
.Ksgvalue was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-1; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; R4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
1.41E+00
0.999997
--'•-' Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF /--'''
. fj-glg-DW plant .
^/ng/mL soil voter
"rrootvcg
^glg DWplant^
Hg/g soil
Srag
,/j.g/g DW plant-.
t^g/g soil
Brforagt
,Hglg DW plant.
Uglg soil
Bvag
,Hg/g DWplant^
Uglg air
BVjbrage
fIMglg DW plant^
/j.g/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited hi
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^, value that is
provided hi this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Brrool value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
hi this table.
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Brfa-- value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KO, value mat is provided in this table.
Bv value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and /fthat is
cited hi Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and K^ values that are provided hi this
table.
Bvf0r.&e value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.03E+03
1.48E+01
7.14E-02
7.14E-02
2.55E-01
2.55E-01
A-3-429
-------
TABLE A-3-120
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR HEXACHLORO-1,3-BUTADIENE
(PERCHLOROBUTADIENE) (87-68-3)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
^.^(day/kgFW)
^^(day/kgFW)
Ba^t (day/kg FW)
J?o^(day/kgFW)
flsUfcu* (day/kg FW)
BCFM
(UkgFW tissue)
BAF/u, (L/kg FW)
BSAFjw, (unitless)
Sa^a value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^,,
value that is provided in this table.
Baiaf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
£a™t value was .calculated by using thethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Bcttf, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
B"
-------
TABLE A-3-121
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FORHEXACHLOROBENZENE (118-74-1)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation <- •
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties
JW(g/mole)
rm(K)
P£(atm)
S(mg/L)
//(atnvnrVmol)
Da (cm2/s)
Dw(cm2/s)
Km (unitless)
^(mL/g)
Kds(TaLlg)
#4,(L/Kg)
Kdbs (mL/g)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, andHeckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
H value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database U.S. EPA (1994d).
£>w value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database U.S. EPA (1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kof that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kda
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon hi soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Kx value that is provided in
this table.
Kdm value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc_ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended KdM value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kdk, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kac that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdt, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdhs value was calculated by
using the Km value that is provided in this table.
-
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
- Value
284.8
504.1
1.62E-08
at25°C
(solid)
8.62E-03
5.35E-04
1.41E-02
7.84E-06
3.18E+05
8.00E+04
8.00EH-02
6.00E+03
3.20E403
A-3-431
-------
TABLE A-3-121
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR HEXACHLOROBENZENE (118-74-1)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
ksgfycar)-1
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Cemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using S, Tm and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Value
1.21E-01
0.999663
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, uglg DW plant .
" uglmL soil water
BrncMt
^tglg DW plant.
Ltgtg soil
Br«
.Hg/g DW plant.
Hg/g soil
Sr^.
^gfgDW plant j
fjg/g soil
*W
.fgfg DW plant.
Hgfg air
Bvj^.
^fjgfg DWplant^
fig/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent
Br^a^g value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table.
Br^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forajge. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Brfypg, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM, value that is provided in this table.
Bv^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor oFlOO.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided in this table.
Bvfxtif value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and //"that is
citedin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, andvighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and K^ values that are provided hi this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
4.02E+03
5.02E+00
2.56E-02
2.56E-02
7.57E+01
7.57E+01
A-3-432
-------
TABLE A-3-121
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR HEXACHLOROBENZENE (118-74-1)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter >
Banm (day/kg FW)
^(day/kg FW)
Bapork (day/kg FW)
Baegg (day/kg FW)
BaMcte, (day/kg FW)
(L/kfFW tissue)
A^OAgFW)
BSAFf,,, (unitless)
Reference and Explanation '
v Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
fiam,;t value was calculated by using the correlation equation with-K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba,^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Ba .value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided m this table.
Bachlcta, value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
-
BAFs were used for compounds with a log Km value above 4.0, as cited in U.S. EPA
(1995b). BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying a food chain
multiplier (FCM) with a geometric mean of various laboratory measured BCFs
obtained from various experimental studies cited in U.S. EPA (1998). FCMs were
obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc) — see Appendix A-3.
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
2.53E-03
7.993E-03
9.68E-03
2.53E+00
6.31E-03
NA
5.52E404
NA
Health Benchmarks
R/D (mg/kg/day)
Ora/ CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
RfC (mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997b)
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
U.S.EPA(1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997c)
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
8.0E-04
1.6E+00
2.8E-03
4.6E-04
1.6E+00
Note:
NA= Not applicable
ND= No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-433
-------
TABLE A-3-122
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (77-47-4)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter I Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
rm(K)
^j(atm)
S(mg/L)
/f(atnvmVmol)
A,(cniVs)
A,(cmVs)
£"„, (unitless)
K«(mL/g)
Kd,(cm*/g)
A'
-------
TABLE A-3-122
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FORHEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (77-47-4)
(Page 2 of 3)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2;B-4-2
9.03E+00
Fv (unitless)
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
0.999994
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
DW plant
* UglmL soil -water
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with-K^, that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
B-2-10
1.40E+03
(fig/g DWplant^
• soil
Brro0f,eg value was calculated b;
hi this table (see section A3 A..
' dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
: of Appendix A-3).
B-2-10
1.47E+01
Bra,
pg/g soil
Bra value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
B-2-9
5.65E-02
Br,
forage
, DW plant\
pglg soil
Brforaee value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
B-3-9
5.65E-02
Bva.
,/j.g/g DWplant^
air
Bv value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited hi Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and K^, values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-8
5.47E-01
,/s.g/g DW plant..
fj-glg air
,„ , .5 the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided in this
table.
B-3-8
5.47E-01
A-3-435
-------
TABLE A-3-122
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE (77-47-4)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter | Reference and Explanation 0, !
'"''TEqiialioHs^' -
-; '"'Value '•?•
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bfl,^ (day/kg FW)
J?o^ (day/kg FW)
&W» (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
#«U«», (day/kg FW)
BCFfa,
(L/kgFW tissue)
ad^CL/kgFW)
BSAFfi,^ (unitless)
R/D (mg/kg/day)
Gra/CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
flyC(mg/mJ)
Inhalation URF
0*gM"
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
.Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Anns (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^t value was calculated by using thethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Bautf value (see section A3.4.2 of Appendix A-3).
Ba^, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
Ba^km value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A3.4.3 of Appendix A-3).
—
BAFs were used for compounds with a log Km value above 4.0, as cited in U.S. EPA
(1995b). BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying a food chain
multiplier (FCM) with a geometric mean of various laboratory measured BCFs
obtained from various experimental studies cited in U.S. EPA (1998). FCMs were
obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc)— See Appendix A-3.
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Health Benchmarks
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
U.S. EPA (1997c)
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
6.41E-04
2.03E-03
2.45E-03
6.41E-01
1.60E-03
NA
5.25E+02
NA
7.00E-03
ND
7.00E-05
ND
ND
Note:
NA-Not applicable
ND •» No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-436
-------
TABLE A-3-123
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR HEXACHLOROETHANE (67-72-1)
(Page 1 of 3)
T
Reference and Explanation
T
Equations-;
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, Heckelman (1989)
236.74
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
459.7
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
6.21E-04
at25°C
(solid)
S(mg/L)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
4.08E+01
/f(atm-m3/mol)
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the Mff, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
3.60E-03
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
1.77E-02
Dw(cm2/s)
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
B-4-20
8.88E-06
^, (unitless)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
9.66E+03
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). Koc value was calculated by using the recommended Km value
that is provided in this table.
1.82E+04
4 (cmVg)
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0( that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kda
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in
this table.
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4;B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
1.82E+01
Kdm value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kx that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdm because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
1.36E-HH
Kdbs (cmVg)
Kdb value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by using the
Koc value that is provided in this table.
B-4-16; B-4-25
7.27E+01
A-3-437
-------
TABLE A-3-123
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR HEXACHLOROETHANE (67-72-1)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter | Reference and Explanation :, ?
Vnlno
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg(yearyl
Fv (unitless)
RCF
, ftg/g DW plant ,
'ftgfmL soil water
BrMeMS
^ftg/g DW plant.
ftg/g soil
*W
^fig/g DW plant j
ftg/g soil
Br^
,ltg/g DW plant.
ftg/g soil
Bv«
fVgfg DWplant^
Pglg air
*»W>
^fig/g DW plant.
ftg/g air
Ksgvalus was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value ofFv was calculated by using S, Tm, and Vp values
that_are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-l;B-2-l;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8;B-4-l;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Brr,op*g value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table (see section A4.3.2 of Appendix A-3).
Brtefrvg value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K~, that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
Brjfeaxc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with-ST^ that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
Bvutfr*x value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and .ffthat
is citea in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990; 1992); then reducing this value
by a factor of 100, as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made
between values for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was
calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and K^ values that are
provided in this table.
B.vJi*ts? value w38 calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and Fthat is
cited in Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi, Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1990; 1992); then
reducing this value by a factor of 100, as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No
distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KV, values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-9
B-3-9
1.41E+00
1.000000
2.78E+02
1.53E+01
1.93E-01
1.93E-01
2.72E-01
2.72E-01
A-3-438
-------
TABLE A-3-123
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FORHEXACHLOROETHANE (67-72-1)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Biotransfer Factors for Animals (Continued)
Bamilk (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
&W (day/kg FW) .
5aeffi(day/kgFW)
BouH. (day/kg FW)
*CFjs*
(L/kg, FW tissue)
&4F^(L/kgFW)
BSAFfah (unitless)
5am/ft value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K&,
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ef value was calculated by using the correlation equation .with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ba -t value was calculated by using thethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
.and multiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A4.3.2 of Appendix A-3). .
BaeesL value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided m this table.
Bachicken value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Babe^ value (see section A4.3.3 of Appendix A-3).
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF values were geometric mean laboratory or field derived
values obtained from various literature sources cited in U.S. EPA (1998) — See
Appendix A-3.
• - • , . . '
~
Health Benchmarks
RJD (mg/kg/day)
Ora/ CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
5/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997b)
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 nrVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg. . .
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U:S. EPA (1997c)
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27 '
B-4-28
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2 ',
Value
7.67E-05
2.43E-04
2.94E-04
7.67E-02
1.92E-04
6.29E+02
NA
NA .
l.OOE-03
1.40E-02
3.50E-03
4.00E-06
1.40E-02
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-439
-------
TABLE A-3-124
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR HEXACHLOROPHENE (70-30-4)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MF(g/mole)
rm(K)
Vp(&tm)
S(mg/L)
tf(atmTn3/mol)
A,(cmVs)
AXcmVs)
K^ (unitless)
K.,(ml/g)
*4(cmVg)
Kik(L/Kg)
£4, (cinVg)
Reference and Explanation
• iitatifttiotts '•' •
.'••'"" Value ''''"''-
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith and Heckleman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith and Heckleman (1989)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
H value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the JWJF, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
De value was calculated using the equation cited hi U.S. EPA (1996a).
Dw value was calculated using the equation cited hi U.S. EPA (1996a).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995).
KK value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans as cited hi
U.S. EPA (1994c). Kx value was calculated by using the recommended K^ value
that is provided hi this table.
Kd. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with ^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon hi soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kda
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon hi soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Kac value that is provided in
this table.
Kdg, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon hi suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^, value
was calculated by using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
Kdfr value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon of 0.04 hi bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon hi bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction hi bottom sediment. Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by using the
K,, value that is provided hi this table.
-
—
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
—
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
406.92
437.1
3.60E-15
at25°C
(solid)
3.0E-03
4.88E-10
3.46E-02
4.01E-06
3.47E+07
1.08E-H)6
1.08E+04
8.08E+04
4.31E+04
A-3-440
-------
TABLE A-3-124
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR HEXACHLOROPHENE (70-30-4)
(Page 2 of 3)
> ;• • Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations •
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991). .
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidlemari
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using 5, Tm, and Vp values
mat are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
\
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
.B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8;B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Value
7.71E-01
0.000143
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, pg/g DW plant .
' fj,glmL soil -water
"rrooncg
,/j.g/g DW plant ,
Uglg soil
Brag
,Hglg DWplant^
Uglg soil
&' forage
^glg DW plant ^
pglg soil
Bvag
fHglg DW plant^
v , . • )
pglg air
BVfomge
flj.glg DW plant^
\ i . )
fj.glg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent. . .
Brroofles value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table (see section A4.3.2 of Appendix A-3).
Br value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988), No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^, value that
is provided in this table. • . • • , '
Br,^,, value was calculated by .using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table. .
Bv value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calaniari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and K^ values that are provided in this
table. ' .' '
Eve,,,,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and ffthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, andvighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and K^ values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.49E+05
1.38E+00
1.70E-03
1.70E-03
1.23E+10
1.23E+10
A-3-441
-------
TABLE A-3rl24
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR HEXACHLOROPHENE (70-30-4)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
£0.4! (day/kg FW)
Ba^Hf (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
5aw (day/kg FW)
^flMfctm (day/kg FW)
(L/kgFW tissue)
5.4^ (Meg FW)
BSAFfa, (unitless)
Reference and Explanation ;^:.v :•;.;:;;
Equations
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
fia^-t value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^af value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
So™,* value was calculated by using thethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
anomultiplying it with the Ba^f value (see section A4.3.2 of Appendix A-3).
2faL_ value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA^ that is cited in
CaUibmia EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
BoM^n value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba,^ value (see section A4.3.2 of Appendix A-3).
-
BAFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value above 4.0, as cited in U.S. EPA
(1995b). BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying a food chain
multiplier (FCM) with a geometric mean of various laboratory measured BCFs
obtained from various experimental studies cited in U.S. EPA (1998). FCMs were
obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc) — See Appendix A-3.
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Value
2.75E-01
8.71E-01
1.05E+00
2.75E+02
6.88E-01
NA
4.66E+03
NA
Health Benchmarks
/S/D (mg/kg/day)
Ora/CSF
(mg/kg/day)*1
,tyC(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mgto1)'1
Inhalation CSF
^mg/kg/day)'1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
3.00E-04
ND
1.10E-03
ND
ND
Note:
NA ~ Not applicable
ND «No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-442
-------
TABLE A-3-125
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR HYDROGEN CHLORIDE (7647-01-0)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation '« ' '
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
r.c-K)
Vp(atca)
S(mg/L)
£f(atm-m3/mol)
Da (cm2/s)
Z?w(cm2/s)
Km (unitless)
*,c(mL/g)
Kds(mL/g)
fikOJKg)
Kdts(TnL/g)
ksg (year)"1
Fv (unitless)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1 989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
U.S. EPA (1994b)
. . ' .
—
Da value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Dw value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
~
-
..
-
-
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited hi Junge (1977).
Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is
provided in this table. '
Equations
Value
-
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16; B-4-18;
B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-l;B-2-l;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
36.47
158.9
4.6E+01
(liquid)
ND
ND
1.73E-01
2.00E-05
NA
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
1.000000
A-3-443
-------
TABLE A-3-125
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR HYDROGEN CHLORIDE (7647-01-0)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
RCF
, uglg WW plant .
'ng/mL soil water'
BfnM*tt
^g/g DWplant^
pgfg soil
*W
,ftg/g DW plant x
Uglg soil
Brf**t*
(ftgfg DW plant.
Uglg soil
BVtt
^gfg DWplant^
ftg/g air
Bv^
^Hgfg DWplant^
Hg/g air
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
NA
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^jt (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Baftrk (day/kg FW)
BCF^day/kgFW)
SCfUfct (day/kg FW)
BCF*,h
(UkgFW)
JWFM(IJkgFW)
BSAFf,,, (unitless)
-
-
-
- • . . .
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NA
NA
A-3-444
-------
TABLE A-3-125
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR HYDROGEN CHLORIDE (7647-01-0)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
RJD (mg/kg/day)
OralCSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
RfC (mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
Reference and Explanation *
Health Benchmarks
Calculated from RfC using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
-
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
-
\ *> i.*"
Equations
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
Value
5.7E-03
ND
2.0E-02
ND
ND
Note:
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-445
-------
TABLE A-3-126
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR INDENO(1,2,3-CD)PYRENE (193-39-5)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MF(g/mole)
7"m(K)
Fp(atm)
S(mg/L)
//(atnvmVmol)
£>.(cmVs)
JCUcmVs)
A'w(unitless)
^(mL/g)
AT4(mL/g)
A'„ value was obtained from WATERS model database U.S. EPA (1995d)
£>„ value was obtained from WATERS model database U.S. EPA (1995d)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
K,e value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for phthalates
and PAHs, cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). Koc value was calculated by using the
recommended K^ value that is provided in this table.
Kd, Value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate/^,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kdp value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on -
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^, value
was calculated by using the KK value that is provided in this table.
Kdte value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment.' Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdts, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
-
-
~
--
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
Value
276.34
435
1.88E-13
at25°C
(solid)
1.07E-02
4.86E-09
1.90E-02
5.66E-06
8.22E+06
4.11E+06
4.11E+04
3.08E+05
1.64E+05
A-3-446
-------
TABLE A-3-126
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR INDENO(1,2,3-CD)PYRENE (193-39-5)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
. Reference and Explanation •
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using S, Tm and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Value
3.47E-01
0.007092
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, fj.g/g DW plant .
" uglmL soil water
f^glg DW plant \
Uglg soil
f/j-g/g DW plant ^
fj.g/g soil
(//g/g DW plant j
fj-glg soil
,Hg/g DW plant.
ftg/g air
,/^g/g DW plant.
pglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Brrootv/!g value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in unstable.
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Bt&rage value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM, value that is provided in this table.
.Bv value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^,,,, and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
Bv forage value was calculated by using the correlation equation •mSa.Km> and /fthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor oilOO.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
4.91E+04
1.19E+00
3.90E-03
3.90E-03
2.67E+08
2.67E+08
A-3-447
-------
TABLE A-3-126
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR INDENO(1,2,3-CD)PYRENE (193-39-5)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Ba^n (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
£aw (day/kg FW)
^flMfcfcm (day/kg FW)
BC/k*
(L/kgFW tissue)
2?,tFM (L/kgFW)
BSAFjy, (unitiess)
Reference and Explanation \ 1 Equations;"
-;---. Value1 -.-.-;
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamak value was calculated by using the correlation equation with-K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
BOj^f, value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Ba^g value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
•Bflcwatm value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
-
BAFs were used for compounds with a log Km value above 4.0, as cited in U.S. EPA
(1995b). BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying a food chain
multiplier (FCM) with a geometric mean of various laboratory measured BCFs
obtained from various experimental studies cited in U.S. EPA (1998). FCMs were
obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc) — See Appendix A-3.
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4:27
B-4-28
6.53E-02
2.07E-01
2.50E-01
6.53E+01
1.63E-01
NA
1.31E+04
NA
Health Benchmarks
$Z> (mg/kg/day)
Ora/ CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
/yC (mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(pgAn3)'1
Inhalation CSF
(m^/kg/dty)'1
-
Calculated by multiplying the Oral CSF for Benzo(a)pyrene by the relative potency
factor for Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene of 0.1 (U.S.EPA 1993e).
-
Calculated from Oral CSF using an inhalation rate of 20 nrVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
Value based on Oral CSF assuming route-to-route extrapolation.
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
ND
7.3E-01
ND
2.1E-04
7.3E-01
Note:
NA™ Not applicable
ND*» No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-448
-------
TABLE A-3-127
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ISOPHORONE (78-59-1)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MF(g/mole)
r.(K)
Vp (atm)
S(mg/L)
//(atnrmVmol)
A,(cm2/s)
Dw(cm2/s)
«„, (unitless)
^(mL/g)
tf4(cm3/g)
JG4.(L/Kg)
AS4,(cms/g)
" * Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1992a).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
/lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the Mf¥, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ for phthalates
and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans,
cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). Koc value was calculated by using the recommended Km
value that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kof that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd,,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Ka^, value
was calculated by using the Kac value that is provided in this table.
Kdt, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kd/a value was calculated by
using the Km value that is provided in this table.
Equations
-
--
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
Value
138.21
265.1
7.08E-07
at25°C
(liquid)
1.20E-H)4
8.15E-09
5.22E-02
7.50E-06
5.00E+01
2.99E+01
2.99E-01
2.25E+00
1.20E+00
A-3-449
-------
TABLE A-3-127
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ISOPHORONE (78-59-1)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
fog (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation , : \: ;
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using^ the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in the table.
Equations
Value
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
9.03E+00
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
.RCF
, Hgfg DW plant .
' ng/mL soil water
Bl~ntntg
^g/gDW plant j
ftg/g soil
Br«
,jug/g DW plant.
pg/g soil
Br/^,
>Hglg DW plant.
figlg soil
AW
^g/g DWplant^
Hg/g air
*»W
,l*glg DW plant.
Uglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Srnot>tg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table.
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Bris°p value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
K&, value that is provided hi this table.
Bv^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K and /f that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided in this table.
fivjfe™ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and !(.„, values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.10E+01
3.68E+01
4.04E+00
4.04E+00
4.42E+02
4.42E+02
A-3-450
-------
TABLE A-3-127
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ISOPHORONE (78-59-1)
(Page 3 of 3)
Bamilk (day/kg FW)
£aw(day/kgFW)
Bflport (day/kg FW)
Baeggs (day/kg FW)
5actefen (day/kg FW)
jBCFy&A
(L/kg, FW tissue)
B^F^(L/kgFW)
BSAFfch (unitless)
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Ora/CSF
(mg/kg/dayX1
*/U(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
0/g/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
Reference and Explanation > ,. ,''""!
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba »t value was calculated by using the correlation equation with-K^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Bat..* value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^* value was calculated by using the fet content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Ba value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
EaMaxn value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in U.S. EPA
(1995b). BCF&h value calculated using the correlation equation with Km obtained
from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980)— See Appendix A-3.
—
_
Health Benchmarks
U.S.EPA(1997b)
U.S.EPA (1997b)
Calculated from Bfl) using an inhalation rate of 20 m'/day and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
Calculated from Oral CSF using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
Value based on Oral CSF assuming route-to-route extrapolation.
Eauations
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
Value
3.97E-07
1.26E-06
1.52E-06
3.97E-04
9.92E-07
1.15E+01
NA
NA
2.00E-01
9.50E-04
7.00E-01
2.70E-07
9.50E-04
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-451
-------
TABLE A-3-128
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR LEAD (7439-92-1)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MF(gtoiole)
7"m(°K)
JMatm)
5(mg/L)
/f(atm-mj/mol)
A,(cm2/s)
A,(cmVs)
•K*, (unitless)
tf«(mL/g)
/T^CmL/g)
&k(L/Kg)
&4, (mL/g)
kg (year)'1
Reference and Explanation : ^
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
All metals, except mercury, are assumed to be nonvolatile at ambient
temperatures.
All metals, except mercury, are assumed to be insoluble in water.
H value is assumed to be zero, because the Vp and S values are zero for all
metals, except mercury.
Da value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Dw value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
-
-
Kd, value was obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984), which
states that several factors, such as experimental methods and soil type, could
influence partitioning or Kd, values. Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984)
compares values between various literature sources and provide this value
which is based on its best judgment.
Kdm value is assumed to be same as the Kd, value, because organic carbon does
not play a major role in sorption for the metals, as cited in U.S. EPA (1994f).
Kdfr value is assumed to be same as the Kd, value, because organic carbon does
not play a major role in sorption for the metals, as cited in U.S. EPA (1994f).
-
—
—
-
—
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6:
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
--
_
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18;
B-4-24
B-4-16;
B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
207.2
600.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.43E-02
6.28E-06
NA
NA
9.00E+02
9.00E402
9.00E+02
ND
A-3-452
-------
TABLE A-3-128
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR LEAD (7439-92-1)
' Parameter I
Fv (unitless)
RCF
, fj,g/g DW plant •
" UglmL soil water
B> 'root veg
(Hg/g DW plant-.
pg/g soil
Brag
,/j.g/g DW plant N
(tg/g soil
Brforage
Hg/gDW plant ^
Hg/g soil
Brgrain
,y.glg DW plant j
fj.g/g soil
Bvag
,/j.g/g DW plant-.
pg/g air
BVfrage
ffj-g/g DW plant ,
V-g/g air
- ~ Reference and ^explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Because they are nonvolatile, metals are assumed to be 100 percent in
paniculate phase and zero percent in the vapor phase, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994f).
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
-
Br value was obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984). Br
vafues'for nonvegetative growth (such as tubers) in Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and
Shor (1984) were used for Brrootveg.
Bra value for fruits was obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984).
^rvalues for nonvegetative growth (reproductive) in Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and
Shor (1984) were used for Br^ (fruits). Br^ value for vegetables was calculated
using data obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984). Br values for
nonvegetative (reproductive) growth and Bv values for vegetative growth
weighted as 75% (reproductive) and 25% vegetative (Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and
Shor [1984])— were used for Br^ (vegetables). .
The weighted average Br value for aboveground produce was obtained as
follows- (1) Br values for fruits combined with a human consumption rate of
fruits of 1.44E-63 kg/kg/day, and (2) Br values for vegetables combined with a
human consumption rate of vegetables of 1 .49E-03 kg/kg/day.
Brfara
-------
TABLE A-3-128
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR LEAD (7439-92-1)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Ba,^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Baraik (day/kg FW)
J&o^qL/kgFW)
^MtiOT (day/kg FW)
BCF^t
(Meg FW tissue)
5/tf^ (day/kg FW)
BSAFfa, (unitless)
%/D (mg/kg/day)
Om/CSF
[mg/kg/day)'1
tyCCmg/m3)
'nhalation URF
GJgfo1)"1
'nhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
Reference and Explanation
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^ values were obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984) for all
metals, except cadmium, mercury, selenium, and zinc.
Bat»f values were obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984) for all
metals, except cadmium, mercury, selenium, and zinc.
NCDEHNR(1997)
-
-
-
v^?«uiS^« j^rophobic> BAF ™s Used> BAFM value was obtained from
WO IJJtiJtiNK. (1997j.
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Health Benchmarks
-
-
-
—
—
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
2.5E-04
3.0E-04
3.6E-04
ND
ND
ND
8.0
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Note:
Al! parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-454
-------
TABLE A-3-129
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR MALATHIONE (121-75-5)
(Page 1 of 3)
Pdrsin6t6l*
x v Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties
MJT(g/mole)
r»(K)
Fp(atm)
S(mg/L)
J7(atnrnrVmol)
DA (cmVs)
£>w(cm2/s) .
S^, (unitless)
Koc(mL/g)
Kds(cm?/g)
Kdsw(UKg)
Kd,, (cmVg)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Vp value cited in Howard (1989-1993).
S value cited in Howard (1989-1993).
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1 994d).
Dw value Was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d). -
Recommended K^, value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995).
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ for phthalates
ami PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxinSj and furans,
cited hi U.S. EPA (1994c). Koc value was calculated by using the recommended Km
value that is provided in this table. .
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kof that is cited hi
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon hi soil:
Recommended 'Kd, value was calculated by using Ihe Koc value that is provided hi
this table, . •
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with KOI. that is cited hi
U.§. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon hi suspended sediment. Recommended Ka^ value
was calculated by, using the Kac value that is provided in this .table.
Kdfc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kac that is cited in
U.s! EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate -Kdts, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
' Equations
-
*-
—
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
- '
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4;B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
Value
330.36
276
1.04E-08
at25°C
(liquid)
1.43E+02
2.40E-08
1.47E-02
5.29E-06
2.29E+02
9.81E+01
9.81E-01
7.36E+00
3.92E+00
A-3-455
-------
TABLE A-3-129
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR MALATHIONE (121-75-5)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
ksg(ycary-1
^V(unitless)
RCF
,j*g/g DIP plant .
*pglmL soil water
BfnM-Ht
,Uglg DW plant.
fig/g soil
*W
,Hglg DW plant \
pgfg soil
Br^g,
^ttg/g DW plant.
Uglg soil
»W
,(tg/g DW plant.
Uglg air
Bvj^.
,Hglg DW plant.
Uglg air '
Reference and Explanation | Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in the table.
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value mat is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
•^Vt"* value w38 calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd. value provided
in this table.
Br^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Br^ggg, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^ that is cited
inTravis and Anns (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
K^, value that is provided in this table.
Bvv value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor oflOO.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and K,, values that are provided in this table.
Bvfoyy value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor oflOO.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided in this table.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-l;B-2-l;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
Vflltlfi
3.61E+01
0.945884
2.16E+01
2.20E+01
1.68E400
1.68E+00
7.58E+02
7.58E+02
A-3-456
-------
TABLE A-3-129
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR MALATHIONE (121-75-5)
(Page 3 of 3)
Pflrfltuctd*
Reference and Explanation
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamak (day/kg FW)
5aw(day/kgFW)
tfa^ (day/kg FW)
5aeffi (day/kg FW)
BflUfcfa. (day/kg FW)
tfCF/z*
(L/kgFW tissue)
Atf^CL/kgFW)
BSAFpk (unitless)
JJamjtt value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by .using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
5a value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Eap,^ value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
muTtiplying it with the Ba,^ value.
Ba value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
BaMcten value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km, value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCFM value calculated using the correlation equation with Km
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980)— See Appendix A-3.
—.-...
— -
Health Benchmarks
RJD (mg/kg/day)
OralCSF
(mg/kg/dayy1
*/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
- ^ . .-
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
- -
- .-..-...
Equations
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
Value
1.82E-06
5.75E-06
6.96E-06
1.82E-03
4.54E-06
3.66E+01
NA
NA
2.0E-02
ND
7.0E-02
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-457
-------
TABLE A-3-130
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR MERCURIC CHLORIDE (7487-94-7)
(Page 1 of 4)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
l£ciuatioiis : : ••'
" :'-': •••'••iValtie: ' •:"--"'-: '
Chemical/Physical Properties
MK(g/moIe)
rm(»K)
Fp(&\m)
S(mg/L)
tf(atnvmVmol)
Z>«(cmVs)
A,(cmVs)
/irw(unitless)
A'«(mL/g)
Kd, (mL/g)
&k(L/Kg)
M,(mL/g)
fag (year)'1
/V (unitless)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckehnan (1989)
U.S.EPA(1996a)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckehnan (1989)
U.S. EPA (1997g)
Da value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1997g).
A, value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
U.S. EPA (1996a)
-
U.S. EPA (1997g)
U.S.EPA(1997g)
U.S. EPA (1997g)
U.S. EPA (1996a)
Estimated based on discussions concerning divalent mercury provided hi
U.S. EPA (1996a).
—
-
-
—
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
--
--
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18;
B-4-24
B-4-16;
B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8;B-4-l;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
271.52
550.1
1.20E-04
6.90E+04
7.1E-10
4.53E-02
5.25E-06
6.10E-01
NA
5.80E+04
l.OOE+05
5.00E+04
0.0
0.850000
A-3-458
-------
TABLE A-3-130
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR MERCURIC CHLORIDE (7487-94-7)
(Page 2 of 4)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation ' , - • :
Equations
- , Vatae
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
. fj.g/g WW plant -
^fj.g/mL soil water'
,/^g/g DW plant.
pg/g soil
^g/g DW plant,
pglg soil
Brfarage
,/^g/g DW plant.
l*g/g soil
.Uglg DWplant^
pg/g air
,l*g/g DW plant.
fj,g/g air
__
U.S. EPA (1997g)
Br value for fruits was obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984).
Br values for nonvegetative growth (reproductive) in Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and
Shor (1984) were used for Br^ (fruits). Br^ value for vegetables was calculated
using data obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984). Br values for
nonvegetative (reproductive) growth and5v values for vegetative growth
weighted as 75% (reproductive) and 25% vegetative (Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and
Shor [1984])— were used for Br^ (vegetables), the weighted average Brag
value for aboveground produce was obtained as follows: (1) 5ra,values for
fruits combined with a human consumption rate of fruits of 1.44E-03 kg/kg/day,
and (2) Br values for vegetables combined with a human consumption rate of
vegetables of 1.49E-03 kg/kg/day.
U.S. EPA (1997g)
U.S.EPA(1997g)
U.S. EPA (1997g)
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
ND
3.60E-02
1.45E-02
0.0
1.8E-H)3
1.8E403
A-3-459
-------
TABLE A-3-130
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR MERCURIC CHLORIDE (7487-94-7)
(Page 3 of 4)
Parameter
Samm(day/kg¥Vf)
-Ba^day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^, (day/kg FW)
AW* (day/kg FW)
SCFjM
(LAgFW)
5^rt(L/kgFW)
BSAFflb (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Default Bam!lk (dry weight value) obtained from U.S. EPA (1997g) was
converted to a wet weight basis assuming a 87% moisture content in milk. U.S.
EPA U.S. EPA (1997g) does not differentiate between different forms of
mercury. Mercury is assumed to be in the form of 87% divalent mercury and
13% methyl mercury in herbivore animals. Therefore, the calculated Bamllt (wet
weight) value was multiplied by 0.87.
Default Bawdry weight value) obtained from U.S. EPA (1997g) was
converted to a wet weight basis assuming a 70% moisture content in beef. U.S.
EPA (1997g) does not differentiate between different forms of mercury.
Mercury is assumed to be in the form of 87% divalent mercury and 13% methyl
mercury in herbivore animals. Therefore, the calculated ^^(wet weight)
value was multiplied by 0.87.
Default Ba^t (dry weight value) of 0.00013 day/kg DW btained from U.S. EPA
(1997g) was converted to a wet weight basis assuming a 70 % moisture content
in pork. U.S. EPA (1997g) does not differentiate between different forms of
mercury. Mercury is assumed to be in the form of 87% divalent mercury and
13% methyl mercury in herbivore animals. Therefore, the calculated Bapork
(wet weight) value was multiplied by 0.87.
Default Ba^ (dry weight value) of 0.1 1 day/kg DW obtained from U.S. EPA
(1997g) was.converted to a wet weight basis assuming a 75 % moisture content
in eggs. U.S. EPA (1997g) does not differentiate between different forms of
mercury. Mercury is assumed to be in the form of 87% divalent mercury and
13% methyl mercury in herbivore animals. Therefore, the calculated Baegg (wet
weight) value was multiplied by 0.87.
Default Ba^ia, (dry weight value) of 0.1 1 day/kg DW obtained from U.S. EPA
(1997g) was converted to a wet weight basis assuming a 75 % moisture content
in chicken. U.S. EPA (1997g) does not differentiate between different forms of
mercury. Mercury is assumed to be in the form of 87% divalent mercury and
13% methyl mercury in herbivore animals. Therefore, the calculated Ba^^
(wet weight) value was multiplied by 0.87.
-
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
2.26E-03
5.22E-03
3.39E-05
2.39E-02
2.39E-02
NA
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
/5/D (mg/kg/day)
Ora/CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
/yCCmg/m3)
U.S.EPA (1997b)
-
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
3.0E-04
ND
1.1E-03
A-3-460
-------
TABLE A-3-130
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR MERCURIC CHLORIDE (7487-94-7)
(Page 4 of 4)
Parameter
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/dayV1
Reference and Explanation "" ,* " 's ' • ' ' | Equations t , Valne ...."...
Health Benchmarks (Continued)
-
-
C-2-1
C-2-2
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not Applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-461
-------
TABLE A-3-131
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR MERCURY (7439-97-6)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MF(g/mole)
T^CK)
J^p(atm)
S(mg/L)
#(atm-mVmoI)
Z?,(cmVs)
4,(cmVs)
^ (unitless)
X^(mL/g)
.KbUmL/g)
*
-------
TABLE A-3-131
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR MERCURY (7439-97-6)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Fv (unitless)
, Reference and Explanation "' - ' | Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977).
Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is
provided in this table.
B-l-l;B-2-l;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B*4-l;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
0.999774
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, pg/g DW plant .
* UglmL soil water
Brrootveg
,Hglg DW plant \
Uglg soil
,/j.g/g DW plant ,
pglg soil
,/^g/g DW plant ^
Hg/g soil
Brgraln
,^glg DW plant-*
fj.glg soil
(Mg/g DW plant )
fj.g/g air
Bvforage
(Mg/g DW plant ^
Vglg air
""*
Elemental mercury does not deposit onto soils. Therefore, it is assumed that
there is no plant uptake through the soil.
Brag value for fruits was obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984).
Br values for nonvegetative growth (reproductive) in Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and
Shor (1984) were used for Br^ (fruits). Br^ value for vegetables was calculated
using data obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984). Br values for
nonvegetative (reproductive) growth and 5v values for vegetative growth
weighted as 75% (reproductive) and 25% vegetative (Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and
Shor [1984])— were used for Br^ (vegetables).
The weighted average Brag value for aboveground produce was obtained as
follows: (1) Br values for fruits combined with a human consumption rate of
fruits of 1.44E-03 kg/kg/day, and (2) Br values for vegetables combined with a
human consumption rate of vegetables of 1.49E-03 kg/kg/day.
Elemental mercury is assumed not to deposit onto soils. Therefore, it is
assumed that there is no transfer of mercury to the aboveground plant parts
through root uptake.
Elemental mercury is assumed not to deposit onto soils. Therefore, it is
assumed that there is no transfer of mercury to the aboveground plant parts
through root uptake.
Elemental mercury exists in very low concentrationsin the vapor phase.
Therefore, Bvag value for elemental mercury is not modeled for the indirect
exposure pathways. Elemental mercury is modeled for the inhalation pathway
only. No literature data is available to calculate &Bvag value for elemental
mercury.
Elemental mercury exists in very low concentrationsin the vapor phase.
Therefore, Bvforage value for elemental mercury is not modeled for the indirect
exposure pathways. Elemental mercury is modeled for the inhalation pathway
only. No literature data is available to calculate a Bvfm.age value for elemental
mercury.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-8
B-3-8
B-2-8
B-3-8
ND
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND
ND
A-3-463
-------
TABLE A-3-131
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR MERCURY (7439-97-6)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Ba** (day/kg FW)
Ba^f (day/kg FW)
tfa,^ (day/kg FW)
-Bo^Cday/kgFW)
•»««*** (day/kg FW)
QJg$W tissue)
a
-------
TABLE A-3-132
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR METHACRYLONITRILE (126-98-7)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
r»(K)
Vp(aHm) '
5(mg/L)
/f(atm-m3/mol)
Da(cm2/s)
£»w(cm2/s)
Km (unitless)
^(mL/g)
J&UcmVg)
JCC
-------
TABLE A-3-132
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR METHACRYLONITRILE (126-98-7)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Ksg value was assumed to be zero due to a lack of data.
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
0.0
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
. pglg DW plant ,
'(jg/mL soil water'
*,«*»
,Hglg DW plant.
Mg/g soil
Br«
fVglg DW plant ^
Uglg soil
B>y**f
.Uglg DW plant.
(tg/g soil
*>«
.Uglg DW plant \
ftg/g air
Bvfi~s*
^glg DW plant j
Hgtg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Br™>v*x value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in mis table.
Br^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
Brjfoy, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM, value that is provided in this table.
Bv^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor oflOO.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KB, values that are provided in this table.
Bvf*rsf va^ue v/as calculated by using the correlation equation with K and //that is
citedin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Kn, values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
6.91E+00
1.85E+02
1.89E+01
1.89E+01
8.81E-04
8.81E-04
A-3-466
-------
TABLE A-3-132
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FORMETHACRYLONITRILE (126-98-7)
(Page 3 of 3)
J*il2*9lil0t&i* x
Bamak (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
£aeaf (day/kg FW)
B
-------
TABLE A-3-133
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR METHANOL (67-56-1)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MF(g/mole)
r*(K)
Vp(ztin)
5(mg/L)
•HXatnvmVmol)
Z>.(cmVs)
A,(cmVs)
/^(unitless)
^(mL/g)
JGKcmVg)
AS^OTKg)
&/fc(cmVg)
faf (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Vp value cited in Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b)
/fvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d)
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995)
Kx value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for phthalates
and PAHs, all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans,
cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). K^ value was calculated by using the recommended K^
value that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd,,
because the value vanes, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation wither that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
Kdjp value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kd^,, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the K^ value that is provided in this table.
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that
1-" • '• : ' ••> .• ~
'Vflluc '
—
—
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
—
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
32.04
175.3
1.30E-01
at25°C
(liquid)
2.90E+04
1.44E-04
4.58E-01
1.64E-05
1.95E-01
3.96E-01
3.96E-03
2.97E-02
1.58E-02
3.61E+01
1.000000
A-3-468
-------
TABLE A-3-133
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR METHANOL (67-56-1)
(Page 2 of 3)
Reference and Explanation s
Eauations
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
• IJ-g/g DW plant .
" uglmL soil -water
,/j.g/g DW plant .
/j.g/g soil
(//g/g DWplant^
pg/g soil
,Hglg DWplant^
ftg/g soil
^IglgDW plant
V-glg oir
BVf°Z/gDW plant
Uglg air
BamUk (day/kg FW)
Ba^day/kgFW)
Ba^i (day/kg FW)
Baegg (day/kg FW)
BaMchm (day/kg FW)
JJCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Br value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
Brr value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km, value that is provided in this table. f
Bv value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM values that are provided in this table.
Bvr value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
citecfm Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamin value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^er value was calculated by using the correlation equation withX^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km,
value that is provided in this table.
Baport value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Bae value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
Bachicha, value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba,^ value.
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
Value
6.37E+00
1.61E+03
9.96E+01
9.96E+01
6.82E-05
6.82E-05
1.30E-09
4.30E-09
5.21E-09
1.55E-06
3.39E-09
A-3-469
-------
TABLE A-3-133
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR METHANOL (67-56-1)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
BCFJM
(L/kgFW tissue)
BAFjuQJkgFW)
BSAFju, (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
EcuurtirtH^s
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals (Continued)
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation with K
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980)— See Appendix A-3.
-
-
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Health Benchmarks
R/D (mg/kg/day)
OralCSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
/£/C(mg/m3)
Mate/on URF
tegfai')'1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
1.70E-01
NA
NA
5.00E-01
ND
1.8E+00
ND
ND
Note:
NA «• Not applicable
ND - No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-470
-------
TABLE A-3-134
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR METHOXYCHLOR (72-43-5)
(Page 1 of 3),
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
r«(K)
Vp(atin)
5(mg/L)
//(amvmVmol)
A,(cm2/s)
A»(cm2/s)
/^(unitless)
^(mL/g)
*4(cm3/g)
AT4,(L/Kg)
M,(cm3/g)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and ,
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1 994d).
Devalue was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kds value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kof that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kda
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the K,,,. value that is provided in
this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koq that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 m suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment,- specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the Kac value that is provided in this table.
Kdis value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumea organic carbon of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kdts, because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by using the
Koc value that is provided in this table.
-r
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2,8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
~
--
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
345.65
351.1
1.62E-09
at25°C
(solid)
8.84E-02
6.33E-06
1.30E-02
5.59E-06
3.36E+04
8.00E+04
8.00E+02
6.00E+03
3.20E+03
A-3-471
-------
TABLE A-3-134
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR METHOXYCHLOR (72-43-5)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
ksg(ycar)'1
Fv (uniUess)
Reference and Explanation [Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using S, Tm, and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
'• : -• • 'Virtue' ''• • •
6.93E-01
0.901041
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, ttg/g DW plant ,
* pglmL soil water'
BrnuHg
*Ug/g DW plant.
fjg/g soil
*W
>l*glg DW plant.
Wfe soil
Br^,
^ttg/g DW plant.
ftg/g soil
*W
^g/g DW plant.
fjg/g air
BVfi^
^glgDW plant.
Uglg air '
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in this table.
Br^fK- value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table (see section A4.3.2 of Appendix A-3).
Br^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Brfsw value Vias calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
%„, value that is provided in this table.
Bvv value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided in this
table.
Bvfrftf value was calculated by using the correlation equation withAT^ and H that is
citedin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor oflOO,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
7.16E402
8.95E-01
9.38E-02
9.38E-02
5.83E+02
5.83E+02
A-3-472
-------
TABLE A-3-134
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR METHOXYCHLOR (72-43-5)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter > -
Bamm (day/kg FW)
tfa^day/kgFW)
B0port (day/kg FW)
5^ (day/kg FW)
AU*. (day/kg FW)
flCFjwi
(L/kg, FW tissue)
BAFM(L/kgTW)
BSAFf,h (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
: Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
JSam(tt value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^,
value that is provided in this table.
Bar™* value was calculated by using thethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba,^ value (see section A4.3.2 of Appendix A-3).
fia value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
B"chaa, value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A4.3.3 of Appendix A-3).
-
BAFs were used for compounds with a log Km value above 4.0, as cited in U.S. EPA
(1995b). RAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying a food chain
multiplier (FCM) with an estimated BCF. BCFs were estimated using the
correlation equation obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980).
FCMs were obtained from U.S. EPA (1 995bc>— See Appendix A-3 .
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
2.67E-04
8.43E-04
1.02E-03
2.67E-01
6.66E-04
NA
3.16E+03
NA
Health Benchmarks
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
RfC (mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-'
U.S. EPA (1997b)
~
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
5.00E-03
ND
1.80E-02
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-473
-------
TABLE A-3-135
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR METHYL ACETATE (79-20-9)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation ^ : ^ ;
Chemical/Physical Properties
M7(g/mole)
Tm(K)
Vp (aim)
S(mg/L)
#(atm-mVmol)
D.(cm%)
A,(cmVs)
/^(unitless)
X«(mL/g)
&/, (cmVg)
*yw(L/Kg)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Vp value cited in Howard (1989-1993).
S value cited in Howard (1989-1993).
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
£>„ value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Recommended K^ value cited in Karickhoffand Long (1995).
KOC value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for phthalates
and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans,
cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). K^. value was calculated by using the recommended Km
value that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0( that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site 'conditions, should be used to calculate Kda
because the value vanes, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd,,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kol. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
:f;:-;;E
-------
TABLE A-3-135
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR METHYL ACETATE (79-20-9)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
XJUonVg)
ksg (year)-1
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation •
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Kdks value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Kac value that is provided in this table.
Ksg value assumed to be 0 due to a lack of data.
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in the table.
Equations
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12;B-5-l
Value
1.30E-01
0.0
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
' PS/8 DW plant .
" iJ-glmL soil water'
*" nxtfveg
(Mg/g DW plant.
fj.g/g soil
ffj-g/g DW plant \
fig/g soil
,f*glg DW plant.
/j.g/g soil
BV°»g/gDW plant.
ftg/g air
,yglg DW plant.
pg/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited hi
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Br . value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table (see section A3 .4.2 of Appendix A-3).
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with/JT^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Br£«m value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM, value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A!^ and # that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values foraboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
Bvforfgf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and £f that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KW values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
6.84E+00
2.10E+02
2.09E+01
2.09E+01
2.01E-03
2.01E-03
A-3-475
-------
TABLE A-3-135
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR METHYL ACETATE (79-20-9)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Ba^. (day/kg FW)
.&jw(day/kg FW)
Ba^t (day/kg FW)
J5a^ (day/kg FW)
£»«»«„ (day/kg FW)
BCFju,
(L/kgFW tissue)
MF^ (L/kgFW)
JJ5M/^ (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
, Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
BamK value was calculated by using the correlation equation with/ST^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with KM that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Bapart value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A3 .4.2 of Appendix A-3).
Ba^, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
Baalim value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A3.4.3 of Appendix A-3).
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited hi
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCFf,h value calculated using the correlation equation with Km
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980)— See Appendix A-3.
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
2.30E-08
7.28E-08
8.82E-08
2.30E-05
5.75E-08
1.32E-H)0
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
/5/D (mg/kg/day)
Oa/CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
/yC(mg/mJ)
Inhalation URF
fcgto3)-'
Inhalation CSF
(rflg/kg/day)-l
U.S. EPA (1997c)
Calculated from R/D using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
l.OOE+00
ND
3.50E+01
ND
ND
Note:
NA-Not applicable
ND ** No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-476
-------
TABLE A-3-136
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR METHYL BROMIDE (74-83-9)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter>
' " Reference and Explanation
' >• Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties
MW(g/mole)
r»a(cm2/s)
A.(an»/s)
Km (unitless)
Kac(mL/g)
Kd, (cmVg)
Ktfw(L/Kg)
MXcmVg)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith and Heckelman (1 989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1 994c).
Geometric mean value cited hi U.S. EPA (1994c).
ff value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided hi this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd.,,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon hi soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
AiL, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^. that is cited hi
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon hi suspended sediment Recommended Kd^, value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kd,,s value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon hi bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction hi bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by using the
Kx value that is provided in this table.
-
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6;B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
Value
94.95
179.44
2.16E+00
at25°C
(liquid)
1.4SE404
1.41E-02
7.28E-02
1.21E-05
1.30E-K)1
9.00E+00
9.00E-02
6.75E-01
3.60E-01
A-3-477
-------
TABLE A-3-136
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR METHYL BROMIDE (74-83-9)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
hg(ycaryl
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation :- '.;'•' l\t. •:':*, '•'"'.-- '•-'• --'••'' -'••. •'"•'-'• •."-' -.
Equations '*
.•::.Viiiiei>.:'
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Ai^ value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, (iglg DW plant .
' uglmL soil water"
BrntMf
^glgDW plant.
ftg/g soil
Br«
.Hg/g DW plant.
Hgfg soil
Br^
^ttgfg DW plant.
Pgfg soil
Bv«
.pgfg DW plant.
HS/S air
Bv^
^Uglg DWplant^
pglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
, provided in this table. The value was 'converted to. a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87, percent.
Br™w value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table (see section A4.3.2 of Appendix A-3).
Br^ value was calculated "by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^, value that
is provided in this table.
Brfc.^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Kg,, value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K~ and /fthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi 0992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the ti and K^ values that are provided in this
table.
Bvf—p value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and ffthat is
citeoin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, andVighi (1990); ana Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided in this
table.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-l;B-2-l;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9; .
B-4-12; B-5-1
9.03E+00
1.000000
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
7.98E+00
8.87E+01
8.79E+00
8.79E+00
6.07E-05
6.07E-05
A-3-478
-------
TABLE A-3-136
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR METHYL BROMIDE (74-83-9)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
* ' " Reference and Explanation
Equations
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamm (day/kg FW)
.Ba^Cday/kgFW)
Be^t (day/kg FW)
5aear(day/kgFW)
&%u*. (day/kg FW)
BCFju,
(L/kg, FW tissue)
AiF^CL/kgFW)
BSAFfth (unitless)
BamHk value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ifew value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA^ that is cited in
Travis and Anns (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Btinrtc value was calculated by using thethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A4.3.2 of Appendix A-3).
Ba,n value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
Bachlclxn value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Babe^f value (see section A4.3.3 of Appendix A-3).
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation vn&iKm
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Value
1.03E-07
3.27E-07
3.95E-07
1.03E-04
2.58E-07
4.14E+00
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
.R/COng/m3)
Inhalation URF
(^g/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
1.40E-03
ND
5.00E-03
ND
ND
Note
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-479
-------
TABLE A-3-137
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR METHYL CHLORIDE (74-87-3)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MF(g/mole)
7-«(K)
l^(atm)
5(mg/L)
#(atm-mj/rnol)
A,(cmVs)
£>w(cinVs)
/^(unitless)
*«(mL/g)
A'4(cmVg)
*ik(L/Kg)
JT4, (cm'/g)
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neill, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neill, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
H value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dv value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited hi
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate .Ktfs,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation vntiiK that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended KaM value
was calculated by using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
Kdj, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used_to calculate Kd^ because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by using the
Kx value that is provided in this table.
Equations
Value
-
-
~
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
50.49
176.1
5.68E+00
at 25°C
(liquid)
6.34E+03
4.52E-02
2.13E-01
1.39E-05
8.00E+00
6.00E+00
6.00E-02
4.50E-01
2.40E-01
A-3-480
-------
TABLE A-3-137
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR METHYL CHLORIDE (74-87-3)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations I Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boehling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
. pglg DW plant .
" [MglmL soil water
"frootveg
^Uglg DWplant^
^ pg/g soil
Brag
.^glg DW plant.
fj.g/g soil
Bfforage
,/jg/g DW plant.
fjg/g soil
Bv*g .
,pglg DW plant ^
pglg air
Bvforage
.Uglg DW plant.
Vg/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^, value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent
Brrootveg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table (see section A4.3.2 of Appendix A-3).
Bra. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Br&m value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
Bva, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and /fthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and VigM (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided in this
table.
Bvforsl,e value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, andVighi (1990); andBacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and VigM (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the Hand K^ values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3^9
B-2-8
B-3-8
9.03E+00
1.000000
7.46E400
1.24E402
1.16E+01
1.16E+01
1.13E-05
1.13E-05
A-3-481
-------
TABLE A-3-137
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR METHYL CHLORIDE (74-87-3)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^(day/kg FW)
JJa^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
BtUfcte, (day/kg FW)
^W-
(L/kgFW tissue)
JMFM(L/kgFW)
BSAFfij, (unitless)
fiamitt value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using thethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
anomultiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A4.3.2 of Appendix A-3).
Sa-j- value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km, value
that is provided in this table.
BCeiata, value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A4.3.3 of Appendix A-3).
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCFf,,, value calculated using the correlation equation witfa.^
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
6.36E-08
2.01E-07
2.43E-07
6.35E-05
1.59E-07
2.86E400
NA
MA
Health Benchmarks
R/D (mg/kg/day)
Orfl/CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
Rj€ (mg/mj)
Inhalation URF
Oig/m3)-'
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
Calculated from RJC using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
U.S. EPA (1995c)
U.S.EPA (1997d)
U.S. EPA (1995b)
U.S. EPA (1995b)
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
8.60E-02
1.30E-02
3.00E-01
1.80E-06
6.30E-03
Note:
NA «• Not applicable
ND « No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-482
-------
TABLE A-3-138
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR METHYL ETHYL KETONE (78-93-3)
(Page 1 of 3)
<•
PflrninctteT*
MT(g/mole)
r.(K)
^(atm)
S(mg/L)
^(atm-mVmol)
A,(cm2/s)
AXcmVs)
X^, (unitless)
^(mL/g)
^(cmVg)
Kit, (I/Kg)
JG4(cmJ/g)
Reference and Explanation • ,
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
# value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d). ,
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995).
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). !£„. value was calculated by using the recommended K^ value
that is provided in this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kai that is cited in
UA EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd,,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kaf that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the KK value that is provided in this table.
Kdbs value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by using the
Kx value mat is provided in this table.
Equations
~
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
"
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
Value
72.10
187.1
1.20E-01
at25°C
(liquid)
2.40E+05
3.61E-05
1.35E-01
1.03E-05
1.91E+00
2.34E+00
2.34E-02
1.76E-01
9.36E-02
A-3-483
-------
TABLE A-3-138
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR METHYL ETHYL KETONE (78-93-3)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
**«*»
Fv (unitless)
RCF
. Vg/g DW plant ,
*t*g/mL soil water'
,!*g/g DW plant.
fg/g soil
,Hglg DW plant.
Uglg soil
,Hglg DW plant.
/jg/g soil
fftg/g DW plant.
Vg/g air
,Hglg DW plant.
pgtg air
Reference and Explanation
' Equations"'""' '• •'' -• Value'"' ;
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited hi Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited hi Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided hi this table.
B-l-2;B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7;B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited hi
Briggs (1982V Recommended value was calculated by using the K value that is
provided hi this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
?rn>tKg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd. value provided
in this table (see section A3.4.2 of Appendix A-3).
Br^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^, value that
is provided in this table.
Br&ag, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KW value that is provided hi this table.
Bv^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation wither,™ and /fthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d£ No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided hi this
table.
B.vf»yst value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); andBacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
3.61E401
1.000000
6.69E400
2.86E+02
2.67E+01
2.67E+01
3.08E-03
3.08E-03
A-3-484
-------
TABLE A-3-138
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR METHYL ETHYL KETONE (78-93-3)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Baesg (day/kg FW)
BacWdten (day/kg FW)
(L/kg^FW tissue)
B4/^A (L/kg FW)
BSAFf,,, (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
BamUt value was calculated by using the correlation equation withX^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Batxef value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba '.park value was calculated by using thethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Baw value (see section A3.4.2 of Appendix A-3).
Ba value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
BaMcken value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A3.4.3 of Appendix A-3).
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
US EPA(1995b). BCFM value calculated using the correlation equation with K^
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980)— See Appendix A-3.
~
..
Equations
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Health Benchmarks
RJD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
RJC (mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
Inhalation CSF
(me/ke/dscvY1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
--
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
Value
1.51E-08
4.79E-08
5.79E-08
1.51E-05
3.78E-08
9.61E-01
NA
NA
6.00E-01
ND
l.OOE+00
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-485
-------
TABLE A-3-139
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE (108-10-1)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter | Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
W(g/mole)
r«(K)
J^(atm)
S(mg/L)
/f(atnvmj/mol)
£>.(cmVs)
A,(cmVs)
Kw (unitless)
*«(mL/g)
A3(cm>/8)
A'^O^Kg)
Kdu (cmVg)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
//value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
De value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
£>„ value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1 995).
KK value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ for all
nonionizing organics except phtnalates, PAHs, dioxins, and fiorans, cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). KK value was calculated by using the recommended K^ value
that is provided in this table.
Kd. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 m soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate AT4,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the K.. value that is provided in
this table.
Kd^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the KK value that is provided in this table.
Kdg value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^,. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdtl, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
—
—
-
—
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
—
—
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
100.16
188.4
2.50E-02
at 25°C
(liquid)
2.00E+04
1.25E-04
8.59E-02
8.36E-06
1.55E+01
1.20E-H)1
1.20E-01
9.00E-01
4.80E-01
A-3-486
-------
TABLE A-3-139
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE (108-10-1)
(Page 2 of 3)
Reference and Explanation
Equations'
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
teg (year)'1
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
3.61E+01
Fv (unitless)
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-l;B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12;B-5-l
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, jj-glg DW plant ~
' fj.g/mL soil water'
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K&, that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
B-2-10
8.22E+00
,^s/s DW plant\
fj.g/g soil
Brrooneg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table.
B-2-10
6.85E401
fj,g/g soil
Br value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
B-2-9
7.95E+00
Br
farage
soil
Brfora e value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KW value that is .provided in this table.
B-3-9
7.95E+00
(Mg/g DW plant ^
pg/g air
Bv value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
citeci in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 250Q by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table. ,
B-2-8
8.26E-03
,/^g/g DWplant^
Uglg air
Bvf a value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factpr of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided in tin's table.
B-3-8
8.26E-03
A-3-487
-------
TABLE A-3-139
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE (108-10-1)
Parameter
S«Ua (day/kg FW)
j&o^day/kgFW)
^V* (day&gFW)
So^ (day/kg FW)
tfoMfcte, (day/kg FW)
BCF,^
(LfcgFW tissue)
&tf>A(L/kgFW)
flSiF^A (unitless)
RfD (mgfcg/day)
OrdCSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
/yC(mg/m})
'nhalatton URF
(pgAn1)-'
nhalation CSF
(mg/kg/dayy1
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bdnut value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K
value that is provided in this table. °"
jBa^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^,
value that is provided in this table.
Bapo# value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
5
-------
TABLE A-3-140
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR METHYL MERCURY (22967-92-6)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
7-m(°K)
Vp (atm)
S(mgfL)
H (atm-mVmol)
Da (cm2/s)
Av(cm2/s)
X^ (unitless)
A^OnJVg)
KtfXmL/g)
Ktfw(L/Kg)
^fa(mL/g)
fag (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
U.S. EPA (1997g)
•
- ' '• .
—
U.S. EPA (1997g)
Devalue was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1997g).
Dw value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
_ . .,
-
U.S. EPA (1997g)
U.S. EPA (1997g)
U.S. EPA (1997g)
U.S. EPA (1996a)
Based on discussions provided in U.S. EPA (1996a), methyl mercury does not
exist in the air/vapor phase.
Equations
-
-
-
~
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-.-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18;
B-4-24
B-4-16;
B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Value
216.0
ND
ND
ND
4.7E-07
5.28E-02
6.11E-06
ND
ND
7.00E+03
l.OOE+05
3.00E+03
0.0
0.000000
A-3-489
-------
TABLE A-3-140
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR METHYL MERCURY (22967-92-6)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
RCF
. vgfg DW plant .
*ltg/mL soil waler'
^WWWS
sltgfg DW plant.
l*glg soil
»W
^g/gDW plant j
A#
&&*&
^gfg DWplant^
t*g/g soil
*»«
^gfg DW plant .
A«g/sr o/r
5tW
^g/g DW plant.
Uglg air
Reference and Explanation • , .-;-^<:;' ;:'SV; -.UV''^
j;;;'JE(mations; ':.-
svvvvainV "'.;-'-
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
U.S. EPA (1997g)
Br^ value for fruits was obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984).
Br values for nonvegetative growth (reproductive) in Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and
Shor (1984) were used for Brw (fruits). Br^ value for vegetables was calculated
using data obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984). Br values for
nonvegetative (reproductive) growth and Bv values for vegetative growth
weighted as 75% (reproductive) and 25% vegetative (Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and
Shor [1984])— were used for Br^ (vegetables).
The weighted average Brag value for aboveground produce was obtained as
follows: (1) Br values for fruits combined with a human consumption rate of
fruits of 1.44E-03 kg/kg/day, and (2) Br values for vegetables combined with a
human consumption rate of vegetables of 1.49E-03 kg/kg/day.
U.S.EPA(1997g)
Methyl mercury is assumed not to exist in the air phase. Therefore, there is no
biotransfer of methyl mercury from air into plants.
Methyl mercury is assumed not to exist in the air phase. Therefore, there is no
biotransfer of methyl mercury from air into plants.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
ND
9.9E-02
2.94E-02
0.0
NA
NA
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bo** (day/kg FW)
&JW (day/kg FW)
Default Ba-pt (dry weight value) of 0.02 day/kg DW for mercury obtained from
U.S. EPA (1997g) was converted to a wet weight basis assuming a 87%
moisture content in milk. U.S. EPA (1997g) does not differentiate between
different forms of mercury. Mercury is assumed to be in the form of 87%
divalent mercury and 13% methyl mercury in herbivore animals. Therefore, the
calculated Ba^ (wet weight) value was multiplied by 0.13.
Default jBflw(dry weight value) of 0.02 day/kg DW obtained from U.S. EPA
(1997g) was converted to a wet weight basis assuming a 70% moisture content
in beef. U.S. EPA (1997g) does not differentiate between different forms of
mercury. Mercury is assumed to be in the form of 87% divalent mercury and
13% methyl mercury in herbivore animals. Therefore, the calculated Bab^-(vret
weight) value was multiplied by 0.13.
B-3-11
B-3-10
3.38E-04
7.80E-04
A-3-490
-------
TABLE A-3-140
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR METHYL MERCURY (22967-92-6)
(Page 3 of 3)
l*fli*itntT6t£i*
Reference and Explanation
Equations >
Valve
Biotransfer Factors for Animals (Continued)
B0pork (day/kg FW)
Bo^day/kgPW)
fl^ttdto, (day/kg FW)
tfCFjw,
(L/kgFW tissue)
A^OL/kgFW)
BSAFfr,, (unitless)
Default jBa-^ (dry weight value) of 0.00013 day/kg DW obtained from U.S.
EPA (1997g) was converted to a wet weight basis assuming a 70 % moisture
content in pork. U.S. EPA (1997g) does not differentiate between different
forms of mercury. Mercury is assumed to be in the form of 87% divalent
mercury and 13% methyl mercury in herbivore animals. Therefore, the
calculated Ba^* (wet weight) value was multiplied by 0.13.
Default Baegg (dry weight value) of 0.1 1 day/kg DW obtained from U.S. EPA
(1997g) was converted to a wet weight basis assuming a 75 % moisture content
in eggs.U.S. EPA (1997g) does not differentiate between different forms of
mercury. Mercury is assumed to be in the form of 87% divalent mercury and
13% methyl mercury in herbivore animals. Therefore, the calculated Baegg (wet
weight) value was multiplied by 0. 1 3 .
Default BdMcto, (dry weight value) of 0.1 1 day/kg DW obtained from U.S. EPA
(1997g) was converted to a wet weight basis assuming a 75 % moisture content
in chicken.U.S. EPA (1997g) does not differentiate between different forms of
mercury. Mercury is assumed to be in the form of 87% divalent mercury and
13% methyl mercury in herbivore animals. Therefore, the calculated Ba^^
(wet weight) value was multiplied by 0.13.
- :
Defeult value cited in U.S. EPA (1997g) for a Trophic Level 4 fish.
—
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
5.07E-06
3.58E-03
3.58E-03
NA
6.80E-HJ6
NA
Health Benchmarks
.R/D(mg/kg/day)
Ora/ CSF
(mg/kg/dayy1
RfC (mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
~
Calculated from Oral CSF using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human
body weight of 70 kg.
~
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
l.OE-04
ND
3.5E-04
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not Applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-491
-------
TABLE A-3-141
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR METHYL PARATHION (298-00-0)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MF(g/mo!e)
rm(K)
^>(atm)
S(mg/L)
/f(atm-mVmol)
jD.(cmVs)
Dw(cm'/s)
Kf, (unitless)
,K«(mL/g)
/fcUcmVg)
A'4,(UKg)
A'4, (cm'/g)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Rvalue cited in U:S. EPA (1992a). '
lvalue cited in U.S. EPA (1992a).
/fvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
De value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
£>w value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Kn. value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
K,,. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A^, for phthalates
and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans,
cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). Kx value was calculated by using the recommended Km
value that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd,,
because the value vanes, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in this table.
Kdk, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
- •
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
—
~~
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
263.23
310.1
1.30E-08
at25°C
(solid)
5.00E401
6.84E-08
1.87E-02
6.43E-06
7.20E+02
2.40E+02
2.40E+00
1.80E+01
9.59E+00
A-3-492
-------
TABLE A-3-141
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR METHYL PARATHION (298-00-0)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation '
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that
are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, uglg DW plant .
~~ IMglmL soil -water
Unroot veg
^glg DWplant^
pg/g soil
Brag
,/tg/g DWplant^
fj.g/g soil
Brforage
^glg DW plant )
/j.g/g soil
Bvag
,!*g/g DW plant^
V / . '
fj.g/g air
Bvforage
,liglg DW plant^
\ , . >
/j.g/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km> that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Srm{vtg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table.
Br value was calculated by using the correlation equation with-K^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Br •f^age value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
Bva. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and .ffthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Qaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided in this table.
.Bv, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and JST^ values mat are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
Value
7.03E-01
0.966349
4.31E+01
1.80E+01
8.64E-01
8.64E-01
9.02E+02
9.02E+02
A-3-493
-------
TABLE A-3-141
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR METHYL PARATHION (298-00-0)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Ba^t (day/kg FW)
fla^. (day/kg FW)
BOf^. (day/kg FW)
^(day&gFW)
5«««a«, (day/kg FW)
flC/^
(Ukg, FW tissue)
B,4F^(LykgFW)
BSAF/M, (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^,
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^value was calculated by using the correlation equation vntia.K that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^j. value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ .value.
J3o«, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
Ba^ta, value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b).' BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation with Km
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
-
-
-
Equations
Value
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
5.72E-06
1.81E-05
2.19E-05
5.72E-03
1.43E-05
8.74E+01
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RJD (mg/kg/day)
Ora/CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
RJ€(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Aig/m3)-'
Mialation CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
U.S.EPA (1997b)
-
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 m'/day and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
2.54E-04
ND
8.8E-04
ND
ND
Note:
NA m Not applicable
ND «• No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-494
-------
TABLE A-3-142
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR METHYLENE BROMIDE (74-95-3)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter *
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
Tm(V
Vp(atin)
5(mg/L)
.ff(atnvm3/mol)
A,(cm2/s)
A,(cm2/s)
Km (unitless)
^(mL/g)
IBaUcnrVg)
^(L/Kg)
Aik(cm3/g)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
5 value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
# value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Dw value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995).
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). Koc value was calculated by using the recommended K^ value
that is provided in this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0f that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd,,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd.,,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kac that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed Organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value variess depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^, value
was calculated by using the Kol. value that is provided in this table.
Kdbs value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by using the
Kac value that is provided in this table.
-
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
~~
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B^t-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
173.86
220.4
2.20E+00
at25°C
(liquid)
1.45E+04
2.64E-02
6.10E-02
7.06E-06
4.17E+01
2.60E-01
2.60E-01
1.95E+00
1.04E+00
A-3-495
-------
TABLE A-3-142
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR METHYLENE BROMIDE (74-95-3)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter | Reference and Explanation : \ V
Eqnations
••' ! • '':• Valued;
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
RCF
, vg/g DW plant .
* pglmL soil water'
.fig/g DW plant.
pg/g soil
,Hg/g DW plant.
Uglg soil
^g/g DW plant )
ftg/g soil
^tglg DW plant ^
Vg/g air
,Hglg DW plant.
Vg/g air
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by ushig the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Braver value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this fable (see section A4.3.2 of Appendix A-3).
Br^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Brevet value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
A^, value that is provided in this table.
Bv^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided in this
table.
Bv/avif value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, and /fthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); andBacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and K^, values that are provided in this
table.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8;B-4-l;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
9.03E+00
1.000000
1.04E-HH
4.01E+01
4.48E+00
4.48E+00
1.13E-04
1.13E-04
A-3-496
-------
TABLE A-3-142
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR METHYLENE BROMIDE (74-95-3)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation "
Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamilt (day/kg FW)
Beiiaf (day/kg FW)
B0fart (day/kg FW)
£0^ (day/kg FW)
5arffcto, (day/kg FW)
BCFjn
(L/kg FW tissue)
JMFjuflAgFW)
BSAFw (unitless)
Bamttk value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^i value was calculated by using thethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A4.3.2 of Appendix A-3).
Bo* value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^, value
that is provided in this table.
Bachlcken value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A4.3.3 of Appendix A-3).
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation with Km
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
- -
- '
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
3.31E-07
1.05E-06
1.27E-06
3.31E-04
8.27E-07
l.OOE+01
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RJD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
^yC(mg/m3)
Inhalation IMF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
U.S. EPA (1997c)
-
Calculated from R/D using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
l.OE-02
MD
3.5E-02
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined hi list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-497
-------
TABLE A-3-143
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR METHYLENE CHLORIDE (75-09-2)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MF(g/mole)
*•„<*>
f£(ata)
S(mg/L)
F(atm-mVmol)
£>.(cma/s)
£>w(cmVs)
Kw (unitless)
^(fflL/»
AV, (cmVg)
/^(L/Kg)
JBUonVg)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
H value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Z>w value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0( that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kda
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd.,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koq that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^, value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kdj,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation withAToc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon ofO.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by using the
KK value that is provided in this table.
~
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
Value
84.94
178.1
4.87E-01
at25°C
(liquid)
1.74E+04
2.38E-03
8.69E-02
1.25E-05
1.80E+01
l.OOE+01
l.OOE-01
7.50E-01
4.00E-01
A-3-498
-------
TABLE A-3-143
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR METHYLENE CHLORIDE (75-09-2)
Reference and Explanation"
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
9.03E+00
Fv (unitless)
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
DW plant .
" fj.g/mL soil water'
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
B-2-10
8.46E+00
DW plant.
/j.g/g soil
fir value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table (see section A3.4.2 of Appendix A-3).
B-2-10
8.46E+01
soil
Br value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A™ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
B-2-9
7.29E+00
Br,
DW plant
fj,g/g soil
Brf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM, value that is provided in this table.
B-3-9
7.29E+00
Bva.
fj,g/g air
Bv value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and /fthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-8
5.11E-04
. DWplant^
fj.g/g air
Bvf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
citecf m Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and K^ values that are provided in this
table.
B-3-8
5.11E-04
A-3-499
-------
TABLE A-3-143
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR METHYLENE CHLORIDE (75-09-2)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Bamat (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Bo^ (day/Kg FW)
50^ (day/kg FW)
BOM^ (day/kg FW)
*CFM
(LJkg FW tissue)
BAF^fL/kgfW)
BSAF/M (unWess)
Bfl> (mg/kg/day)
OrtACSF
nig/kg/day)'1
3/C(mg/mJ)
'nhalation URF
frigAn*)'1
nhalation CSF
(nig/kg/day)-'
Reference and Explanation '
Equations
'"'' Value'' •
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamitl value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K
value that is provided in this table. m
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K
value that is provided in this table.
•&W value was calculated by using thethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba,^ value (see section A3.4.2 of Appendix A-3).
Ba _value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K value
that is provided in this table.
£a
-------
TABLE A-3-144
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR NAPHTHALENE (91-20-3)
(Page 1 of 3)
Reference and Explanation
Equations Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
F(g/mole)
Budavari, O'Neill, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
128.16
Budavari, O'Neill, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
353.3
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
1.17E-04
at25°C
(solid)
(mg/L)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
f(atm-m3/mol)
ff value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
4.82E-04
A.(cm2/s)
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d)
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
5.26E-02
Z)w(cm2/s)
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d)
B-4-20
8.92E-06
^, (unitless)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
2.36E+03
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
1.19E+03
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U& EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd,,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
1.19E+01
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate KdM because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
8.93E+01
X«4.(cm3/g)
Kdb, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kx that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon ofO.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kd,,,, because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by using the
Koc value that is provided in this table.
B-4-16; B-4-25
4.76E+01
ear)'1
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethlin, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
5.27E+00
A-3-501
-------
TABLE A-3-144
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR NAPHTHALENE (91-20-3)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation K
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using S, Tm, and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, uglg DW plant .
' uglmL soil water'
,Ug/g DW plant.
ttglg soil
r l*gtg DW plant .
l*g/g soil
(fgfg DW plant.
ftg/g soil
ittgfg DW plant.
Hgfg air
t(*glg DW plant.
fig/g air
.RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroa KS value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd. value provided
in this table.
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K value that
is provided in this table.
Brtsptst value Vfas calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
Bvef value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector oflOO,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided in this
table.
Bvf!tfff value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, and #that is
citedin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
0.999999
9.81E+01
8.23E+00
4.35E-01
4.35E-01
4.52E-01
4.52E-01
A-3-502
-------
TABLE A-3-144
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR NAPHTHALENE (91-20-3)
(Page 3 df 3)
; Parameter
Reference and Explanation -
Equations
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Baailk (day/kg FW)
•5aj^(day/kgFW)
.Ba^t value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited hi
Travis and Arms (1988). ' Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ba,^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided hi this table.
B-3-11
B-3-10
Value
1.87E-05
5.92E-05
Biotransfer Factors for Animals (Continued)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Baegg (day/kg FW)
EaMdxn (day/kg FW)
*CFj»
(L/kg FW tissue)
A^OVkgFW)
5£4FM (unitless)
Ba k value was calculated by using thethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value. w .
.Ba value was calculated by using the correlation equation withX^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
Bachlcken value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying if with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation with K^
obtained from Veiih, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See.Appendix A-3.
-
• • •
Health Benchmarks
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Ora/ CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
/?/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
U.S. EPA (1995b)
'
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 nrVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
'
'
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
7.16E-05
1.87E-02
4.67E-05
2.15E+02
NA
NA
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
4.0E-02
ND
1.40E-01
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-503
-------
TABLE A-3-145
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR NICKEL (7440-02-0)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MFfe/mole)
*•„(*)
Vp(&tm)
5(mg/L)
// (atnvm'/mol)
Z>, (cmVs)
Dw(cmVs)
A'w(unitless)
.fi^CmL/g)
tf4(mL/g)
fckCL/Kg)
A'<4, (mL/g)
fog (year)'1
Reference and Explanation ; ' :: ;
Equations
•^..:#al»e S"'X
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
All metals, except mercury, are assumed to be nonvolatile at ambient
temperatures.
All metals, except mercury, are assumed to be insoluble in water.
/fvalue is assumed to be zero, because the Vp and S values are zero for all
metals, except mercury.
De value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Dv value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
-
-
Kd, value was obtained from U.S. EPA (1996a), which provides pH-based
values that were estimated by using the MINTEQ2 geochemical speciation
model.
Kd^ value is assumed to be same as the Kds value, because organic carbon does
not play a major role in sorption for the metals, as cited in U.S. EPA (1994f).
Kdt, value is assumed to be same as the Kd, value, because organic carbon does
not play a major role in sorption for the metals, as cited in U.S. EPA (1994f).
-
~
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
~
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18;
B-4-24
B-4-16;
B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
58.69
1,828
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.26E-01
1.46E-05
NA
NA
16atpH=4.9;
65atpH=6.8;
1,900 at
pH=8.0;
16atpH=4.9;
65atpH=6.8;
1,900 at
pH=8.0;
16 at pH=4.9;
65atpH=6.8;
1,900 at
pH=8.0;
ND
A-3-504
-------
TABLE A-3-145
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR NICKEL (7440-02-0)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Fv (unitless)
Because they are nonvolatile, metals are assumed to be 100 percent in
particulate phase and zero percent in the vapor phase, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994f).
Equations -
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8;B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Value
0.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, vg/g DW plant .
* UglmL soil water'
BrroaMg
^glg DWplant^
fj.g/g soil
Brag
^glg DWplant^
Hg/g soil
Bfforage
^glgDW plant j
Uglg soil
Brpw
(Mgfc DW plant ^
Pg/g soil
Bvag
,Hglg DW plant \
tiglg air
BVforage
,liglg DW plant^
\ , . I
IMglg air
"
Br,OOMg value was calculated by multiplying the uptake slope factor with a
conversion factor of 2 x 109 g/ha soil. The uptake slope factor and the
conversion factor were obtained from U.S. EPA (1992b) for root vegetables.
Br value for fruits was calculated by multiplying the uptake slope factor with
a conversion factor of 2 xlO9 g/ha soil. The uptake slope factor and the
conversion factor were obtained from U.S. EPA (1993e) for garden fruits. Brag
value for vegetables was calculated by weighting the uptake slope factors for
garden fruits (75%) and leafy vegetables (25%) and multiplying the result with
a conversion factor of 2 xlO* g/ha soil. The uptake slope factors and the
conversion factor were obtained from U.S. EPA (1993e).
The weighted average Br value for aboveground produce was obtained as
follows: (1) Era, values for fruits combined with a human consumption rate of
fruits of 1.44E-03 kg/kg/day, and (2) Br values for vegetables combined with a
human consumption rate of vegetables or 1.49E-03 kg/kg/day.
Br, i, value was calculated by multiplying the uptake slope factor with a
conversion factor of 2 x 10' g/ha soil. The uptake slope factor and the
conversion factor were obtained from U.S. EPA (1992b) for leafy vegetables.
Br_.oin value was calculated by multiplying the uptake slope factors with a
conversion factor of 2 x 109 g/ha soil. The uptake slope factor and the
conversion factor were obtained from U.S. EPA (1992b) for grains/cereals.
Metals are assumed to not experience air-to-leaf transfer, as cited in
U.S.EPA(1995b).
Metals are assumed to not experience air-to-leaf transfer, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b).
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-8
B-3-8
B-2-8
B-3-8
ND
8.00E-03
9.31E-03
3.20E-02
6.00E-03
NA
NA
A-3-505
-------
TABLE A-3-145
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR NICKEL (7440-02-0)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^n (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
flo^,,, (day/kg FW)
J^Ufcte (day/kg FW)
BCF,^
(LTcgFW tissue)
&tFM(L/kgFW)
^WffcA
(unitless, FW tissue)
.&*„« values were obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984) for all
metals, except cadmium, mercury, selenium, and zinc.
£«W values were obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984) for all
metals, except cadmium, mercury, selenium, and zinc.
-
-
-
Geometric mean value obtained from various literature sources (see
Appendix A3 .4).
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-3-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
l.OE-03
6.0E-03
ND
NA
NA
3.07E+02
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
/?/D (mg/kg/day)
Ora/CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
/yC(mg/mJ)
Mtalation URF
(Mg/m*)-'
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
2.0E-02
ND
7.02E-02
ND
ND
Note:
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-506
-------
TABLE A-3-146
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2-NITROANILINE (88-74-4)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation ' >
> Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
r«(K)
Vp(a.tin)
S(mg/L)
ff(atm-m3/mol)
A,(cm2/s)
£»w(cm2/s)
KW (unitless)
^(mL/g)
Kd,(CBL3/g)
Kd^fLKg)
Kdbs (cnrVg)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Vp value cited in Montgomery and Welcom (1991).
S value cited in Montgomery and Welcom (1991).
H value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl,
and Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant Recommended value was
calculated by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
£>„ value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoffand Long (1995).
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for
phthalates and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs,
dioxins, and furans, cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). K^ value was calculated by
using the recommended Km value that is provided in this table.
Kds value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil.
Measured organic carbon hi soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to
calculate Kds, because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic
carbon in soil. Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the KM value
that is provided hi this table.
Kdp, value was calculated by using the correlation equation withiro<. that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in
suspended sediment. Measured organic carbon hi suspended sediment, specific
to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kdm because the value varies,
depending on the fraction of organic carbon hi suspended sediment.
Recommended Kdm value was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided
in this table.
Kdis value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon hi bottom sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending
on the fraction of organic carbon hi bottom sediment. Recommended Kdts value
was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in this table.
-
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-3-3; B-3-4;
B-3-5; B-3-6;
B-4-3; B-4-4;
B-4-5; B-4-6;
B-4-10;B-4-ll
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
Value
138.12
342.1
1.07E-05
at25°C
(solid)
1.26E+03
1.17E-06
4.29E-02
9.81E-06
7.08E+01
3.93E+02
3.93E+00
2.95E+01
1.57E+01
A-3-507
-------
TABLE A-3-146
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2-NITROANILINE (88-74-4)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter | Reference and Explanation ;
;:: Equations -:;
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
fe£(year)-l
Fv (unitless)
Ksg value wasassumed to be 0 due to a lack of data.
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values .
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was- converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-l;B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8;B-4-l;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
•'•''.•Valoi1::-'"
0.0
0.999980
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
^ Ug/g DW plant j
v Hg/mL soil water'
BrnHYtf
^Hgfg DWplant^
Hg/g soil
Br«
^g/g DWplant^
ftgtg soil
*W
(ttgfg DW plant.
ftgtg soil
*W
^g/g DW plant j
pg/g air
BvJ*w
.Uglg DW plant.
ftg/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table. The value was then converted to a, dry weight
basis by using a moisture content of 87 percent.
Br^M value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value
provided in this table.
!?/•„ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the K^ value that is provided in this table.
Brp^fr value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the KM, value that is provided in this table.
Bvaf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K and H that
is cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1 990); and Bacci, Cerejeira,
Gaggi, Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a
factor of 100. No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce
and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C,
by using the H and Km values that are provided in this table.
Bvf*vst value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, and H
that is cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira,
Gaggi, Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a
factor of 100. No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce
and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C,
by using the H and Km values that are provided in this table.
"
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.25E+01
3.18E+00
3.30E+00
3.30E+00
4.47E+00
4.47E+00
A-3-508
-------
TABLE A-3-146
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2-NITROANILINE (88-74-4)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation" -
'Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamak (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
jfcV* (day/kg FW)
Baeegs (day/kg FW)
5acteten (day/kg FW)
5CFM
(L/kg FW tissue)
JMFjuOJkgFW)
BSAFfr,, (unitless)
Bamak value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
cited in Travis and Anns (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using
the KM, value that is provided in this table.
Ba^tf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
Ba t value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Babelf value.
Baeggs value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is
citea in California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
BacMdxn value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef -
(15/19) and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation with
Km obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix
A-3.
-
~
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
5.62E-07
1.78E-06
2.15E-06
5.62E-04
1.40E-06
l.SOE^Ol
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RJD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF (mg/kg/day)'1
-R/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URFfagfm3)'1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
U.S. EPA (1997a)
. '
U.S. EPA (1997c)
-
.. - ,
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
6.00E-05
NA
2.00E-04
NA
NA
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-509
-------
TABLE A-3-147
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 3-NITROANTLINE (99-09-2)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MP(g/mole)
rm.(cm2/s)
ZUcroVs)
jK^ (unitless)
A^(mL/g)
tf4(cmVg)
*yw(I^Kg)
.Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
-
S value cited in Montgomery and Welcom (1991)
.ff value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl,
and Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant.
De value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Z>w value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995).
Kx value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ for
phthalates and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs,
dioxins, and furans, cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). Koc value was calculated by
using the recommended K^ value that is provided in this table.
Kd. value was calculated by using' the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil.
Measured organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to
calculate Kd;, because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic
carbon in soil. Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value
that is provided in this table.
Kdy, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with JC. that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in
suspended sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific
to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value vanes,
depending on the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment.
Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by using the Kac value that is provided
in this table.
-
-
-
--
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
~~
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-3-3; B-3-4;
B-3-5; B-3-6;
B-4-3; B-4-4;
B-4-5; B-4-6;
B-4-10;B-4-ll
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
138.12
387.1
1.07E-05
at25°C
(solid)
8.90E+02
1.65E-06
7.11E-02
8.23E-06
2.34E+01
1.66E+02
1.66E+00
1.24E+01
A-3-510
-------
TABLE A-3-147
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 3-NITROANILINE (99-09-2)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Wcm/g)
fog (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Kdbs value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending
on the fraction of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kab! value
was calculated by using the Kac value that is provided in this table.
Ksg value was assumed to be 0 due to a lack of data.
Fv value was assumed to be 1.0 due to a lack of data.
Equations
Value
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-l;B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
6.62E+00
0.0
0.999993
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
i Pg/g DW plant .
UglmL soil "water
n
orrootveg
,/J,g/g DW plant.
fJ-g/g soil
Brag
t^g/g soil
,[iglg DW plant.
Uglg soil
.jjjglg DW plant.
Uglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight
basis by using a moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroaft value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value
provided in this table.
Br^. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the KM value that is provided in this table.
j?^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with X_, and H that
is cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira,
Gaggi, Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a
factor of 100. No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce
and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C,
by using the H and K^ values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
8.94E+00
5.40E+00
6.26E+00
6.26E+00
9.71E-01
A-3-511
-------
TABLE A-3-147
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 3-NITROANILINE (99-09-2)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
*W
^g/g DW plant j
pg/g air
Reference and Explanation ! • | Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Plants (Continued)
Bv^p value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H
that is cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira,
Gaggi, Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a
factor of 100. No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce
and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C,
by using the Hand Km values that are provided in this table.
B-3-8
9.71E-01
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^t (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
tfa*** (day/Teg FW)
SCF.W
(L/kg FW tissue)
BAFjtoQJkgFW)
BSAFf,,, (imitless)
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using
the KB, value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
cited in Travis and Anns (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using
the KM value that is provided in this table.
Bo™* value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^^ value.
Bfle_ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with.^ that is
citea in California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using
the KM, value that is provided in this table.
l?acWoiOT value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef
(15/19) and multiplying it with the Bate^- value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF values were geometric mean laboratory or field derived
values obtained from various literature sources cited in U.S. EPA (1998) — see
Appendix A-3.
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
1.86E-07
5.88E-07
7.12E-07
1.86E-04
4.64E-07
5.92E+00
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RfD (tng/kg/day)
Ow/CSFOrag/kg/day)-1
,?yC(mg/mJ)
Inhalation URFfag/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-'
U.S.EPA(1997a)
-
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
3.00E-03
NA
1.05E-02
NA
NA
A-3-512
-------
TABLE A-3-148
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 4-NITROANILINE (100-01-6)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation -
Chemical/Physical Properties
AOF(g/mole)
r.(K)
P£(atm)
S(mg/L)
/f(atm-m3/mol)
A,(cm2/s)
A»(cm2/s)
AT^, (unitless)
^(mL/g)
A*4(cmVg)
«4,(L«g)
JBdt.(cmVg)
Budavari, O'Neii, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neii, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
-
5 value cited in Montgomery and Welcom (1991)
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl,
and Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dv value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995).
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for
phthalates and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs,
dioxins, and fiirans, cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). Kx value was calculated by
using the recommended K^ value that is provided in this table.
Kd. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil.
Measured organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to
calculate Kds, because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic
carbon in soil. Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
Kdm value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^Toc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in
suspended sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific
to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies,
depending on the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment.
Recommended Kdm value was calculated by using the K^. value that is provided
in this table.
Kdbs value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending
on the fraction of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kabs value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Equations -
Value
-
--
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-3-3; B-3-4;
B-3-5; B-3-6;
B-4-3; B-4-4;
B-4-5; B-4-6;
B-4-10;B-4-ll
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
138.12
419.10
ND
1.07E-05
1.65E-06
4.31E-02
9.75E-06
2.46E+01
1.72E+02
1.72E400
1.29E+01
6.89E+00
A-3-513
-------
TABLE A-3-148
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 4-NITROANILINE (100-01-6)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
kg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Ksg value was assumed to be 0 due to a lack of data.
Fv value was assumed to be 1.0 due to a lack of data.
Equations
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-l;B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Value
0.0
0.999944
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, Uglg DW plant .
' (tglrnL soil water'
^ftg/g DW plant ^
IJtglg soil
,ftg/g DW plant.
(Mglg soil
(Itgtg DW plant.
fig/g soil
,t*g/g DW plant.
pgtg air
(f*S/g DW plant.
Uglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight
basis by using a moisture content of 87 percent.
Brraolv(g value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value
provided in this table.
Br., value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km, value that is provided in this table.
Brfr-y value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km, value that is provided in this table.
Bvaf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K-, and H that
is cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira,
Gaggi, Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a
factor of 100. No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce
and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C,
by using the Hand Km, values that are provided in this table.
Bvf^y value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H
that is cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira,
Gaggi, Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a
factor of 100. No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce
and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C,
by using the H and K^ values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
9.04E+00
5.25E+00
6.08E+00
6.08E+00
1.02E+00
1.02E+00
A-3-514
-------
TABLE A-3-148
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 4-NITROANILINE (100-01-6)
(Page 3 of 3)
', - " • --/' • pj)I*jl Yflpf g¥*
Reference and Explanation >
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamilk (day/kg FW)
Baw(day/kgFW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Baegg (day/kg FW)
Bfluuh. (day/kg FW)
^CFjsrt
(L/kgFW tissue)
B^F^CL/kgFW)
BSAFf..h (unitless)
5crm(tt value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
£ew value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
Ba rk value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Baes, value was calculated by using the correlation equation vnthK^ that is
cited in California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using
the KO, value that is provided in this table.
BaMcten value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef
(15/19) and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U S EPA (1995b). BCFfsh value calculated using the correlation equation with
Kn, obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980)— See Appendix
A-3.
-
—
Equations
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Health Benchmarks
RJD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF (mg/kg/day)'1
tfyC (mg/m3)
Inhalation URF (Mg/m3)"1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/ke/day)"1
U.S. EPA (1997a)
-
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
—
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
Value
1.95E-07
6.18E-07
7.48E-07
1.95E-04
4.88E-07
5.00E+00
NA
NA
3.00E-03
NA
1.05E-02
NA
NA
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-515
-------
TABLE A-3-149
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR NITROBENZENE (98-95-3)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MF(g/mole)
r*(K)
Pp(alm)
S(mg/L)
//(atnvm'/mol)
£>.(cmVs)
Z>w(cmVs)
^Tw (unitless)
J^(mL/g)
A'4(mL/g)
&k(L/Kg)
Ai4,(mL/g)
Reference and Explanation
EltftliifiOOS
...'/; •Value''""
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1 994c)
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database, U.S. EPA (1994d).
£„ value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database, U.S. EPA (1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd,,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kdff value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 m suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to stte
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdw because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the KK value that is provided in this table.
Kdt, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdts value was calculated by
using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
-
—
-
—
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
—
—
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
123.11
279.1
3.21E-04
at25°C
(liquid)
1.92E-H)3
2.06E-05
5.43E-02
9.43E-06
6.80E+01
1.19E+02
1.19E+00
8.93E+00
4.76E-K)04
A-3-516
-------
TABLE A-3-149
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR NITROBENZENE (98-95-3)
(Page 2 of 3)
Pflrflmctcr
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation "
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the liquid-phase Vp value that is provided in
this table.
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, ng/g DW plant .
^g/mL soil water'
"rroat veg
,/^g/g DW plant.
pg/g soil
Brag
^glgDWplant^
Uglg soil
Brforage
,/^g/g DW plant.
Uglgsoil
*>«
.pglg DW plant.
pg/g air
BVforage
,IJ.glg DW plant j
pg/g air . '
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroolveg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table.
Bras! value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Rvalue that
is provided in this table.
Brfora,e value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
Bva, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
citecl in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and K^ values that are provided in this
table.
BVf0ra,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and ffthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the ff and Km values that are provided in this
table.
Equations
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
Value
1.28E+00
0.999998
1.23E+01
1.03E+01 ,
3.38E+00
3.38E+00
2.43E-01
2.43E-01
A-3-517
-------
TABLE A-3-149
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR NITROBENZENE (98-95-3)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Ba^tk (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^t (day/kg FW)
Ifcr,^, (day/kg FW)
jSfleWoi*, (day/kg FW)
BOP,*
(L/k&FW tissue)
,R4FM(L/kgFW)
BSAFf,h (unitless)
Reference and Explanation ; -
Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamttk value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K-, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Baj^j. value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba,^ value.
Sau-y value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
•foUtto, value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF values were geometric mean laboratory or field derived
values obtained from various literature sources cited hi U.S. EPA (1998)— See
Appendix A-3.
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Health Benchmarks
RJD (mg/kg/day)
Ora/GSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
^C(mg/mJ)
Inhalation URF
(VBtmY
Inhalation CSF
(rag/kg/day)-'
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
5.40E-07
1.71E-06
2.07E-06
5.40E-04
1.35E-06
5.92E+00
NA
NA
5.0E-04
ND
2.0E-03
ND
ND
Note:
NA- Not applicable
ND31 No data available
AH parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-518
-------
TABLE A-3-150
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2-NITROPHENOL (88-75-5)
(Page 1 of 3)
' ip ji j*fj met cr
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
r«(K)
Vp(atm)
S(mg/L)
H(atm-m3/mol)
Z>0(cm2/s)
Dw(cm2/s)
KM, (unitless)
^(mL/g)
Kds(cm3/g)
AiC(L/Kg)
Kdbs (cm3/g)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Vp value cited in Howard (1989-1993).
S value cited in Howard (1989-1993).
ff value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl,
and Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was
calculated by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
£>w value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995).
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for
phthalates and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs,
dioxins, and furans, cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). Koc value was calculated by
using the recommended K^ value that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil.
Measured organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to
calculate Kd., because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic
carbon in soil. Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Koc value
that is provided in this table.
KdM value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kal. that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in
suspended sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific
to site conditions, should be used to calculate /&/„, because the value varies, .
depending on the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. •
Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided
in this table.
Kdbs value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd,,,, because the value varies, depending
on the fraction of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended' Kd^ value
was calculated by using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
--
•
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-3-3;B-3-4;
B-3-5; B-3-6;
B-4-3; B-4-4;
B-4-5; B-4-6;
B-4-10;B-4-ll
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24 .
B-4-16; B-4-25
Value s
139.11
317.1
2.63E-04
at25°C
(solid)
2.50E+03
1.46E-05
4.44E-02
9.19E-06
6.17E+01
3.S3E+02
3.53E+00
2.65E+01
1.41E+01
A-3-519
-------
TABLE A-3-150
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2-NITROPHENOL (88-75-5)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in
Howard, Bbethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-l;B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-l;B-3-2;
B-4-l;B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8;B-4-9; .
B-4-12; B-5-1
^:VaIu*;rf
9.03E+00
0.999999
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
( ftgteDW plant )
* UglmL soil water'
Brn,^
^ftg/g DW plant.
(*gfg soil
*W
,Hgfg DW plant.
Uglg soil
*W
^Jtglg DW plant.
figfg soil
*w
^g/g DW plant j
^g/# a/r
*»W
^Mg/g DWplant^
Uglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Brig'gs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table. The value was then converted, to a dry weight
basis by using a moisture content of 87 percent:
Br^vfg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value
provided 'in this table.
Br value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the K^, value that is provided in this table.
Br/<*tgf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the KM, value that is provided in this table.
Bvaf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K-, and //that
is cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira,
Gaggi, Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a
factor of 100. No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce
and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) or 25°C,
by using the Hand Km values that are provided in this table.
BVf^^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H
that is cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira,
Gaggi, Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a
factor of 100. No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce
and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C,
by using the Hand K^ values that are provided in this table.
"
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.19E+01
3.36E-HM)
3.57E+00
3.57E+00
3.08E-01
3.08E-01
A-3-520
-------
TABLE A-3-150
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2-NITROPHENOL (88-75-5)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamtlk (day/kg FW)
5aw(day/kgFW)
Baport (day/kg FW)
5aea, (day/kg FW)
5acWcte, (day/kg FW)
JCFjM
(L/kgFW tissue)
&4FM (L/kgFW)
BSAFfrk (unitless)
5am;;t value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
Ba^tf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using
the K^, value that is provided in this table.
Ba^k value was calculated by using the fet content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^^ value.
Baegg value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is
citea in California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
Bach!cken value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef
(15/19) and multiplying it with the Bate^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCFfah value calculated using the correlation equation with
Km obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix
A-3.
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Value
4.90E-07
1.55E-06
1.88E-06
4.90E-04
1.22E-06
1.35E+01
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Ora/ CSF (mg/kg/day)-1
RfC(ms/m3)
Inhalation URF (^g/m3)-'
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
-
-
~
-
~
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-521
-------
TABLE A-3-151
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 4-NITROPHENOL (100-02-7)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
• • •-''•' . ' • '
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MK(g/mole)
7"m(K)
J>(atm)
S(mg/L)
#(atnvm3/mol)
£).(cms/s)
£>w(cinVs)
AV(unitless)
^c(mL/g)
A'4 (ctn'/g)
&k(L/Kg)
Kdu (cm'/g)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Vp value cited in Howard (1989-1993).
S value cited in Howard (1989-1993).
//value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl,
and Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was
calculated by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
A. value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoffand Long (1995).
Kx value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ for
phthalates and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs,
dioxins, and furans, cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). Koc value was calculated by
using the recommended Km value that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil.
Measured organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to
calculate Kdp because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic
carbon in soil. Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value
that is provided in this table.
KeL, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0£ that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in
suspended sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific
to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value vanes,
depending on the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment.
Recommended Kd^, value was calculated by using the KK value that is provided
in this table.
Kdi, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Ka. that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending
on the fraction of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdts value
was calculated by using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
-
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-3-3; B-3-4;
B-3-5; B-3-6;
B-4-3; B-4-4;
B-4-5; B-4-6;
B-4-10;B-4-ll
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
139.11
386.1
1.32E-06
at25°C
(solid)
2.50E+04
7.32E-09
4.30E-02
9.61E-06
8.13E+01
4.37E+02
4.37E+00
3.28E+01
1.75E+01
A-3-522
-------
TABLE A-3-151
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 4-NITROPHENOL (100-02-7)
(Page 2 of 3)
• -Parameter
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation , •
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in
Howard, Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
' Equations
Value
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-l;B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
2.09E+02
0.999939
Biotransfcr Factors for Plants
RCF
( pg/g DW plant j
v fj,g/mL soil water'
"^"root veg
,/j.g/g DW plant.
pg/g soil
Bras
^glg DW plant )
pg/g soil
Brforage
fV-glg DWplant^
fj,g/g soil
*vas
,lJ.glg DW plant^
\ , . >
fj-glg air
Bvforage
ftj.glg DW plant^
\ , . J
t^glg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight
basis by using a moisture content of 87 percent.
Br root veg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value
provided in this table.
Br ™ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the KM, value that is provided in this table.
Brforas, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the KM, value that is provided in this table.
Bv value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that
is cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira,
Gaggi, Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a
factor of 100. No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce
and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C,
by using the H and Km values that are provided in this table.
Bvf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H
that is cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira,
Gaggi, Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a
factor of 100. No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce
and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C,
by using the H and K^, values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.32E+01
3.01E+00
3.05E400
3.05E+00
8.26E+02
8.26E+02
A-3-523
-------
TABLE A-3-151
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 4-NITROPHENOL (100-02-7)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Bo** (day/kg FW)
Bo^day/kgFW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
£«,„, (day/kg FW)
Ba,^ (day/kg FW)
BCF/M
(LflkgFW tissue)
^/vw(L/kgFW)
BSAFfu, (unitless)
Reference and Explanation :, , ;; *
"'.-' Equations ••
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
jffa^,t value was calculated by using the correlation equation with-K^, that is
cited in Travis and Anns (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using
the KM value that is provided in this table.
fiflw- value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using
the X^, value that is provided in this table.
Ba • t value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba,^ value.
Sa^,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, that is
cited in California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using
the KV, value that is provided hi this table.
•5fleWdUn value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef
(15/19) and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation with
KM obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix
A-3.
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Value
6.46E-07
2.04E-06
2.47E-06
6.46E-04
1.61E-06
1.67E+01
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
R/D (mg/kg/day)
Oa/ CSF (mg/kg/day)-1
^/C(mg/mJ)
Inhalation URF G'g/m3)'1
Inhalation CSF
(rng/kg/dayy1
U.S. EPA (1997a)
-
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
6.20E-02
NA
2.17E-01
NA
NA
Note:
NA «• Not applicable
ND «• No data available
AH parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-524
-------
TABLE A-3-152
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR N-NITROSO-DI-N-BUTYLAMINE (924-16-3)
(Page 1 of 3)
Pjil*aiiieteF ^
Reference and Explanation •
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
AffPXg/mole)
rm(K)
^(atm)
S(mg/L)
ff(amvm3/mol)
A,(cm2/s)
Dw(cm2/s)
X,,,,, (unitless)
*oc(mL/g)
KdUcmVg)
*«UL/Kg)
M, (cmVg)
MW value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b)
—
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b)
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b) •
H value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated .
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Devalue was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1 995)
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans, cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). Koc value was calculated by using the recommended Km value
that is provided in this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kof that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd^, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koq that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^, value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kdhs value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kac that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdhs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Kac value that is provided in this table.
-
.-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
™"
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10;B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6;B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
158.20
NA
3.80E-04
at25°C
1.10E+03
5.47E-05
6.50E-02
7.52E-06
2.57E+02
1.07E+02
1.07E+00
8.05E+00
4.29E+00
A-3-525
-------
TABLE A-3-152
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR N-NITROSO-DI-N-BUTYLAMINE (924-16-3)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
teg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value cited in NC DEHNR (1997).
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
7.44E+00
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, uglg DW plant ,
''fjg/mL soil water'
Br^
,Hgtg DW plant.
ftgtg S°M
*W
.Vg/g DW plant.
ftgfg soil
*W
,ftg!g DW plant.
Uglg soil }
*»W
.ftgfg DW plant.
pg/g air
AW
*Hglg DW plant.
(tglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Br^^g value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table.
Br^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
jBrg™ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
uiTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
!£„, value that is provided in this table.
fiv^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM values that are provided in this table.
Afrw value w38 calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and VigW (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
2.30E+01
2.14E+01
1.57E+00
1.57E+00
3.77E-01
3.77E-01
A-3-526
-------
TABLE A-3-152
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR N-NITROSO-DI-N-BUTYLAMINE (924-16-3)
(Page 3 of 3)
'Parawieter J
Reference and Explanation
" Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamllk (day/kg FW)
5a^(day/kgFW)
£aport (day/kg FW)
Baegss (day/kg FW)
A***, (day/kg FW)
BCFf*
(L/kg FW tissue)
IM/kOAgFW)
BSAFfri (unitless)
Uam(tt value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Aims (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ef value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^,rk value was calculated by using thethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
ana multiplying it with the Babe,f value.
Ba value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Camornia EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided m this table.
Bachtcken value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^, value calculated using the correlation equation withX^
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980)— See Appendix A-3.
—
—
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
2.04E-06
6.46E-06
7.82E-06
2.04E-03
5.10E-06
4.00E+01
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RJD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
fl/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(^g/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
-
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997c)
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
ND
5.4E+00
ND
1.6E-03
5.4E+00
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-527
-------
TABLE A-3-153
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR A^-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE (86-30-6)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MF(g/mole)
rm(K)
*Matm)
S(mg/L)
//(atnvmVmol)
A,(cnvVs)
0w(cmVs)
A'^CuniUess)
^(mL/g)
J&4(cmVg)
&C(LflCg)
#4, (cmVg)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1992a).
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1992a).
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
£>w value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Estimated value was obtained from U.S. EPA (1994c).
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in
this table.
Kd.,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in this table.
Kdfr value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kft. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdts, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the KK value that is provided in this table.
-
-
~
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
—
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
198.23
339.6
1.74E-07
at 25°C
(solid)
3.50E-+01
9.84E-07
3.12E-02
6.35E-06
1.06E+03
3.27E+02,
forpH
range of
4.9 to 8.0
3.27E+00
2.45E+01
1.31E+01
A-3-528
-------
TABLE A-3-153
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR AT-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE (86-30-6)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
fog (year)"1
Fv (unitless)
• Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that
are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
Equations ,
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, /J.g/g DW plant .
" jJiglmL soil water
"Vroot veg
^glg DW plant )
ftg/g soil
,Hglg DW plant.
pg/g soil
,Hglg DW plant.
pglg soil
(lJ,glg DW plant.
pg/g air
Bvforage
fl^glg DW plant \
Hg/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroolveg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table.
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^, value that
is provided in this table.
Brfy,age value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
]£.„„ value that is provided in this table.
Bva, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values foraboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided in this table.
Bvforaze value was calculated by using the correlation equation vn&iK^, and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, andVighi (1990); andBacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
Value
7.44E+00
0.998671
5.61E+01
1.71E+01
6.89E-01
6.89E-01
9.51E+01
9.51E+01
A-3-529
-------
TABLE A-3-153
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR JV-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE (86-30-6)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
BamA (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
flo^ (day/kg FW)
flfl^ (day/kg FW)
Jtoctete, (day/kg FW)
SCP-M
(UkgFW tissue)
£WF/wCUkg1FW)
BSAF^, (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
BamHk value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Baiaf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^i value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Ba.- value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
Ba^tettn value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba,^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCFf,h value calculated using the correlation equation with Km
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
8.45E-06
2.67E-05
3.24E-05
8.45E-03
2.11E-05
1.18E+02
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
R/D (mg/kg/day)
Ora/CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
^7(mgAn3)
Inhalation URF
(^g/m3)'1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
-
U.S.EPA (1997b)
-
Calculated from Oral CSF using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
Value based on Oral CSF assuming route-to-route extrapolation.
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
ND
4.9E-03
ND
1.4E-06
4.9E-03
Note:
NA « Not applicable
ND «• No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-530
-------
TABLE A-3-154
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR AT-NITROSODIPROPYLAMINE (621-64-7)
Parameter
T (K)
»«-»
S(mg/L)
.ff(atm-m3/mol)
A,(cm2/s)
Dw(cm2/s)
Km (unitless)
*°<(mL/S)
Kds (cm3/g)
K4»(L/Kg)
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
..
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1992a).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1992a).
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided hi this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
D value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Km value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
K value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for phthalates
and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and nirans,
cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). Koc value was calculated by using the recommended K^
value that is provided in this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U § EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.sT EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdn value
was calculated by using the Kac value that is provided in this table.
Equations |
-
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
Value
130.19
ND
6.09E-06
at25°C
(liquid)
1.46E+04
5.43E-08
5.67E-02
7.75E-06
2.40E+01
1.70E+01
1.70E-01
1.28E+00
A-3-531
-------
TABLE A-3-154
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR JV-NITROSODIPROPYLAMINE (621-64-7)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter | Reference and Explanation
A'<4(crnVg)
A* (year)"
Fv(unitless)
RCF
, ftg/g DW plant .
*(tg/mL soil water
tffg/g DW plant.
t*g/g soil
,pglg DW plant \
Vgfg soil
(l*g/g DW plant*
(*g/g soil
ftig/g DW plant*.
l*g/g air
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
£& Sn Ue/W^,ci&ulated by ^"S ±e correlation equation with Kac that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions
should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdb. value was calculated bv
using the A« value that is provided in this table.
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jams, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991)
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in the table.
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with KM that is cited in
Bnggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the AL, value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
?rrw*t y?Jue was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table.
Bi-eg value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
irayis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K value that
is provided in this table. "*
?rfyfff value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
A^, value that is provided in this table.
^Vi^"? was calculated by using the correlation equation with AL, and H that is
rated in Bacci, Calaman Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calaman, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Aw values that are provided in this table.
- . '.: Eqnations > | •. '"Value : .••.1
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-1; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
6.80E-01
1.41E+00
0.999902
8.99E+00
5.29E+01
6.17E+00
6.17E+00
3.04E-f01
A-3-532
-------
TABLE A-3-154
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR Ar-NITROSODIPROPYLAMINE (621-64-7)
^g/gDW plant
fj.g/g air
Bamttk (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
B^ (day/kg FW)
Baea, (day/kg FW)
BacWcto, (day/kg FW)
(L/kf FW tissue)
BAFf,h (L/kg FW)
BSAFf,,, (unitless)
RJD (mg/kg/day)
Qra/ CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
/?/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
1 Inhalation CSF
Reference and Explanation
Biotransfer Factors for Plants (Continued)
Bvf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cittcfm Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); andBacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100.
No distraction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba ,;t value was calculated by using the correlation equation with-K^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Bo,...* value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba rk value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork, to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Ba value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
BacMcken value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^, value below 4.0, as cited in
U S EPA (1995b). BCF*,, value calculated using the correlation equation with A™
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980)— See Appendix A-3.
—
_
Health Benchmarks
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997b)
Equations ,
B-3-8
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
Value
3.04E+01
1.91E-07
6.03E-07
7.30E-07
1.91E-04
4.76E-07
6.59E+00
NA
NA
ND
7.0E+00
ND
2.0E-03
7.0E+00
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-533
-------
TABLE A-3-155
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCTACHLORODIBENZO(P)DIOXIN (3268-87-9)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MF(g/mole)
rw(K)
Vp(&tm)
S(mg/L)
/f(atnvmVmol)
D.CcmVs)
Dw(craVs)
^(unitless)
*«(mL/g)
A'4(cmVg)
taUOTKg)
jKHi, (ctnVg)
Chemical/Physical Properties
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Devalue was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
U.S. EPA (1994a)
KK value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ for dioxins
and fiirans that is cited in U.S. EPA (1994a; 1994c). Recommended value was
calculated by using the recommended K^ value that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil.
Measured organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to
calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic
carbon in soil. Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the K,, value
that is provided in this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in
suspended sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific
to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies,
depending on the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment.
Recommended Kdm value was calculated by using the K.. value mat is provided
in this table.
Kdu value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies depending
on the fraction of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kabs value
was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in this table.
—
—
-
—
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
—
~
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
460.76
598.1
8.61E-11
at 25°C
(solid)
4.00E-07
7.00E-09
1.06E-02
3.69E-07
3.89E+07
2.40E+07
2.40E+05
1.80E+06
9.60E+05
A-3-534
-------
TABLE A-3-155
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCTACHLORODIBENZO(P)DIOXIN (3268-87-9)
Parameter * \
fag- (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
RCF
( yglg DW plant }
IJ-glmL soil -water
Brroptveg
,yg/g DW plant )
pglg soil
,fig/g DWplant^
/ig/g soil
,/j.g/g DW plant ,
Mg/g soil
^glgDW plant ^
fj.g/g air
Bvforage
(A*g/g DW plant )
yttg/g azV
Bamfflt (day/kg FW)
150^ (day/kg FW)
(Page 2 of 3)
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life hi soil, as cited in
Mackay, Shiu, and Ma (1992).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited hi Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^, value
that is provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight
basis by using a moisture content of 87 percent
Brnotv g value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value
provicfld hi this table.
Br value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in fravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the KM, value that is provided hi this table.
Brf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
citedin Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided hi this table.
Bvag value was obtained from Lorber (1995). No distinction was made between
aboveground produce and forage.
\
Bvfora „ value was obtained from Lorber (1995). No distinction was made
between aboveground produce and forage.
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
U.S. EPA (1995a)
Ba^rf value was calculated by increasing Bamm values by a factor of 5.43, as
discussed in Section A3 .3 . 14.
Equations
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-1; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
.B-2-8
B-3-8
B-3-1 1
B-3-10
Value
1.09E-01
0.992606
1.62E+05
6.77E-01
1.59E-03
1.59E-03
8.60E+06
8.60E+06
l.OOE-03 1
5.43E-03
A-3-535
-------
TABLE A-3-155
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCTACHLORODIBENZO(P)DIOXIN (3268-87-9)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Bafxk (day&g FW)
(L$gFW tissue)
(unttSess, FW tissue)
(L/kgFW tissue)
/M/^OA-gFW)
(unitless, lipid based)
7£F (unitless)
Oral CSF (mg/kg/day)'1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
ItfD (mg/kg/day)
Inhalation C/RFO/g/m3)"1
#C(mgAn>>
Reference and Explanation
HUitiatiQiis
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals (Continued)
Ba^ value was calculated by increasing Bamilk values by a factor of 6.57, as
discussed in Section A3 .3. 15.
Baftf value was calculated by multiplying the BCF value for chicken eggs by a
chicken soil consumption rate of 0.02 kg (DW)/day (See Appendix A-3). BCF
value for eggs was obtained from Stephens, Petreas, and Hayward (1995) for the
high exposure chicken group.
BojMcta, value was calculated by multiplying the BCF value for chicken by a
chicken soil consumption rate of 0.02 kg (DW)/day (See Appendix A-3). BCF
value for chicken was obtained from Stephens, Petreas, andHayward (1995) for
the high exposure chicken group.
-
-
U.S. EPA (1994a)
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
6.57E-03
9.90E-03
1.10E-03
NA
NA
l.OOE-04
Other Parameters
U.S. EPA (1994a)
—
Health Benchmarks
-
-
-
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
0.001
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Note:
NA - Not Applicable
ND - No Data Available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-536
-------
TABLE A-3-156
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCTACHLORODIBENZO(P)FURAN (39001-02-0)
(Page 1 of 3)
TPsff&ni&t&y
MF(g/mole)
r»(K)
Vp(atm)
S(mg/L)
.HXatnvmVmol)
A,(cm2/s)
Z>w(cm2/s)
^ (unitless)
Koc(wL/g)
Kds(cm3/g)
/^(L/Kg)
MXcmVg)
Reference and Explanation
Equations ,
Chemical/Physical Properties
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S.EPA (1994a)
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dv value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
U.S. EPA (1994a)
K value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ for dioxins
and furans that is cited in U.S. EPA (1994a) and U.S. EPA (1994c).
Recommended value was calculated by using the recommended KM value that is
provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA^ that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil.
Measured organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to
calculate Kd,, because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic
carbon in soil. Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Koc value
that is provided in this table.
Kd,,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in
suspended sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific
to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies,
depending on the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment.
Recommended Kd^, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided
in this table.
Kdbs value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd,,,, because the value varies depending
on the fraction of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value
was calculated by using the Kac value that is provided in this table.
-
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8;B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
"
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
, Value
444.76
531.1
4.93E-15
at25°C
(solid)
1.20E-06
1.90E-06
1.48E-02
3.78E-06
6.03E+08
3.72E+08
3.72E+06
2.79E-H)7
1.49E+07
A-3-537
-------
TABLE A-3-156
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCTACHLORODIBENZO(P)FURAN (39001-02-0)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Fv(unitless)
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in
Mackay, Shiu, and Ma (1992).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-l;B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-l;B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
1.10E-01
0.001671
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, ttglg DW plant .
*(tgfmL soil water'
BfnHMg
^glgDW plant j
ftg/g soil
*r«
^glgDW plant j
ftg/g soil
AW
^fig/g DW plant ^
Uglg soil
*w
^g/gDffp/o«K
^g/g a/r
*W
.^g/gDFp/aw^
A
-------
TABLE A-3-156
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCTACHLORODIBENZO(P)FURAN (39001-02-0)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation , " v
Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bam!lt (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Sa^ (day/kg FW)
(Llg FW tissue)
(L/isgf W tissue)
(L/kfpW tissue)
S^FM(L/kgFW)
SS4FM
(unitless, lipid based)
U.S. EPA (1995a)
80^ value was calculated by increasing Bamttk values by a factor of 5.43, as
discussed in Section A3 .3. 14.
Ba^ value was calculated by increasing BaMk values by a factor of 6.57, as
discussed in Section A3.3.15.
Ba value was calculated by multiplying the BCF value for chicken eggs by a
chicken soil consumption rate of 0.02 kg (DW)/day (See Appendix A-3). BCF
value for eggs was obtained from Stephens, Petreas, and Hayward (1995) for the
high exposure chicken group.
Bachichm value was calculated by multiplying the BCF value for chicken by a
chicken soil consumption rate of 0.02 kg (DW)/day (see Appendix A-3). BCF
value for chicken was obtained from Stephens, Petreas, and Hayward (1995) for
the high exposure chicken group.
-
-
U.S. EPA (1994a)
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
l.OOE-03
5.43E-03
6.57E-03
7.92E-03
4.40E-04
NA
NA
l.OOE-04
Other Parameters
TEF (unitless)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
-
0.001
Health Benchmarks
Ora/CSF (mg/kg/day)-'
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Inhalation URF (j^g/m3)'1
RfC(mg/m3)
-
-
-
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not Applicable
ND = No Data Available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-539
-------
TABLE A-3-157
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1,2,3,7,8-PENTACHLORODIBENZO(P)DIOXIN (40321-76-4)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
W(g/mole)
Tm(K)
Vp(*tia)
S(mg/L)
//(atavmVmol)
D.(cm2/s)
AXcmVs)
^(unitless)
KK(mUg)
Kdt (cmVg)
^(ITKg)
JC4 (cm'/g)
U.S.EPA(1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S.EPA(1994a)
Homologue group average value obtained from U.S. EPA (1994a).
U.S. EPA (1994a)
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dv value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
U.S. EPA (1992d)
Kx value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A-., for dioxins
and furans that is cited in U.S. EPA (1994a) and U.S. EPA (1994c).
Recommended value was calculated by using the recommended Km value that is
provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil.
Measured organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to
calculate Kdr because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic
carbon in soil. Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
Kdy, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in
suspended sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific
to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kdm because the value vanes,
depending on the fraction of organic carbon hi suspended sediment.
Recommended KdM value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided
in this table.
Kdk, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment Measured organic carbon hi bottom sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies depending
on the fraction of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value
was calculated by using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
-
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
—
—
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
356.42
513.1
1.25E-12
at25°C
(solid)
1.20E-04
2.60E-06
1.21E-02
4.38E-06
4.37E+06
2.69E+06
2.69E+04
2.02E+05
1.08E+05
A-3-540
-------
TABLE A-3-157
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1,2,3,7,8-PENTACHLORODIBENZO(P)DIOXIN (40321-76-4)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
ksg (year)"1
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation ' 1 Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Ksg value was assumed to be 0 due to a lack of data.
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values
mat are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-l;B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7;B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8;B-4-l;
B-4-8;B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
0.0
0.219208
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, pglg DW plant ,
^/j.g/mL soil water'
"^rootvez
,Hglg DW plant.
Uglg soil
Brag
^glg DWplant^
pg/g soil
Borage
^glg DW plant j
Hg/g soil
*W
^glg DW plant )
Uglg air
BVforag,
,^glg DW plant ^
Hg/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with-K^, that is cited
hi Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight
'basis by using a moisture content of 87 percent.
.Brro value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value
provided hi this table.
Br^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with-K^, that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
•B* 'fora*? value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is
cited m Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was obtained from Lorber (1995). No distinction was made between
aboveground produce and forage.
Bvforage value was obtained from Lorber (1995). No distinction was made
between aboveground produce and forage.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
3.01E+04
1.12E+00
5.62E-03
5.62E-03
1.20E405
1.20E+05
A-3-541
-------
TABLE A-3-157
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1,2,3,7,8-PENTACHLORODIBENZO(P)DIOXIN (40321-76-4)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation —
Equations
': Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^Hf (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
(L$g FW tissue)
(lJqj?W tissue)
5CF*,*
(L/kg FW tissue)
A4FM(L/kgFW)
AS&F^
(unitless, lipid based)
U.S.EPA(1995a)
£04^- value was calculated by increasing BamUt values by a factor of 5.43, as
discussed in Section A3.3. 14.
Bapork value was calculated by increasing Bamm values by a factor of 6.57, as
discussed in Section A3.3. 15.
Ba,^ value was calculated by multiplying the BCF value for chicken eggs by a
chicken soil consumption rate of 0.02 kg (DW)/day (See Appendix A-3). BCF
value for eggs was obtained from Stephens, Petreas, and Hayward (1995) for the
high exposure chicken group.
Ztecwdtoi value was calculated by multiplying the BCF value for chicken by a
chicken soil consumption rate of 0.02 kg (DW)/day (See Appendix A-3). BCF
value for chicken was obtained from Stephens, Petreas, and Hayward (1995) for
the high exposure chicken group.
-
-
U.S. EPA (1994a)
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
l.OOE-02
5.43E-02
6.57E-02
4.71E-02
5.50E-02
NA
NA
9.00E-02
Other Parameters
TEF (unitless)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
-
0.50
Health Benchmarks
Oral CSF (mg/kg/day)-1
Mtalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)"'
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Inhalation URFfag/m3y*
/?/U(mg/mJ)
-
-
-
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Note:
NA • Not Applicable
ND - No Data Available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-542
-------
TABLE A-3-158
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1,2,3,7,8-PENTACHLORODIBENZO(P)FURAN (57117-41-6)
(Page 1 of3)
Parameter
AflF(g/mole)
rm(K)
Vp(aXm)
5(mg/L)
/f(atm-m3/mol)
A,(cm2/s)
0w(cm2/s)
KM (unitless)
^c(mL/g)
#4 (cmVg)
M*(L/Kg)
» Reference and Explanation , ' ,
> Equations -
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
Homologue group average value obtained from U.S. EPA (1994a).
U.S. EPA (1994a)
Da value was calculated by using Equation A-3-2. Recommended value was
calculated by using the MW and Da values that are provided in the tables in
Appendix A-3 for 2,3,7,8-TCDF.
Dw value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
U.S. EPA (1992d)
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K for dioxins
and furans that is cited in U.S. EPA (1994a) and U.S. EPA (1994c).
Recommended value was calculated by using the recommended Km, value that is
provided in this table.
Kds value was calculated by using the correlation equation with ATOC that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil.
Measured organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to
calculate Kd,, because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic
carbon in soil. Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Koc value
that is provided in this table.
Kd^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation wiihKoc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in
suspended sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific
to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies,
depending on the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment.
Recommended Kd^, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided
in this table.
-
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
~
—
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
340.42
498.1
3.58E-12
at25°C
(solid)
2.40E-04
6.20E-06
1.70E-02
4.51E-06
6.17E+06
3.80E+06
3.80E+04
2.85E+05
A-3-543
-------
TABLE A-3-158
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1,2,3,7,8-PENTACHLORODIBENZO(P)FURAN (57117-41-6)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
J&UcmVg)
fag (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Kd^. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies depending
on the fraction of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value
was calculated by using the K^. value that is provided in this table.
ksg value assumed to be the same as the ksg value calculated for 2,3,4,7,8-
PentaCDF. ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as
cited in Mackay, Shiu, and Ma (1992).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value ofFv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-l;B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Value
1.52E+05
3.57E-01
0.364027
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
^ ttg/g DW plant ^
* (iglmL soil water'
Br^^,
.Uglg DW plant.
Hgfg soil ' .
Br*
^g/g DWplant^
fjg/g soil
*w
^g/g DWplant^
pgtg soil
Bv«
^g/gDWplani^
pglg air
*W
,l*glg DW plant.
pg/g air
.RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight
basis by using a moisture content of 87 percent.
•^Ww va*ue was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value
provided in this table.
Br,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the KW value that is provided in this table.
Brtregf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the K^, value that is provided in this table.
Bv^ value was obtained from Lorber (1995). No distinction was made between
aboveground produce and forage.
BVfmgc value w38 obtained from Lorber (1995). No distinction was made
between aboveground produce and forage.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
3.93E+04
1.03E+00
4.61E-03
4.61E-03
4.60E+04
4.60E+04
A-3-544
-------
TABLE A-3-158
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
1,2,3,7,8-PENTACHLORODIBENZO(P)FURAN (57117-41-6)
fPage3of3)
' " Reference and Explanation .
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamllk (day/kg FW)
Ba^day/kgFW)
Bapark (day/kg FW)
Saesr
(L/kgFW tissue)
[L^c'gfw tissue)
BCF^
(L/kgFW tissue)
B^,, (L/kgFW)
-B&IF^
(unitless, lipid based)
U.S. EPA (1995a)
Bautf value was calculated by increasing BamUk values by a factor of 5.43, as
discussed in Section A3.3.14.
Ba t value was calculated by increasing Bamttk values by a factor of 6.57, as
discussed in Section A3.3.15.
Ba value was calculated by multiplying the BCF value for chicken eggs by a
chicken soil consumption rate of 0.02 kg (DW)/day (See Appendix A-3). BCF
value for eggs was obtained from Stephens, Petreas, and Hayward (1995) for the
high exposure chicken group.
Ba,Mcken value was calculated by multiplying the BCF value for chicken by a
chicken soil consumption rate of 0.02 kg (DW)/day (See Appendix A-3). BCF
value for chicken was obtained from Stephens, Petreas, and Hayward (1995) for
the high exposure chicken group.
~
_
U.S. EPA (1994a)
Other Parameters
TEF (unitless)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
Equations
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
~
Health Benchmarks
Ora/CSF (mg/kg/day)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Inhalation URF (^g/m3)-'
RfC (me/m3)
~
-
-
—
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
Value
2.00E-03
1.09E-02
1.31E-02
ND
ND
NA
NA
9.00E-02
0.05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not Applicable
ND = No Data Available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-545
-------
TABLE A-3-159
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
2£,4,7,8-PENTACHLORODIBENZO(P)FURAN (57117-31-4)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Mf(g/raole)
r«(K)
^p(ata)
S(mg/L)
//(atnvmVmol)
ZJ.(cmVs)
A,(«nVs)
^(unitless)
A'«(mL/g)
*tf,(cmj/g)
«k(L/Kg)
A'4, (cm'/g)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
U.S.EPA(1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S.EPA(1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
Da value was calculated by using Equation A-3-2. Recommended value was
calculated by using the AffFand Da values that are provided in the tables in
Appendix A-3 for 2,3,7,8-TCDF.
A, value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
U.S. EPA (1992d)
KK value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ for dioxins
and furans that is cited in U.S. EPA (1994a) and U.S. EPA (1994cj.
Recommended value was calculated by using the recommended Kmu value that is
provided in this table.
Kd. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil.
Measured organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to
calculate Kd;, because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic
carbon in soil. Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the KK value
that is provided in this table.
Kd-, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in
suspended sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific
to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value vanes,
depending on the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment.
Recommended KdM value was calculated by using the K^. value that is provided
in this table.
KtL, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0{. that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies depending
on the fraction of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
~
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
~
—
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
340.42
469.1
4.33E-12
at25°C
(solid)
2.36E-04
6.20E-06
1.70E-02
4.51E-06
8.32E+06
5.13E+06
5.13E+04
3.85E+05
2.05E+05
A-3-546
-------
TABLE A-3-159
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
2,3,4,7,8-PENTACHLORODIBENZO(P)FURAN (57117-31-4)
(Page 2 of 3)
Reference and Exlanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg(year)~l
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in
Mackay, Shiu, and Ma (1992).
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-l;B-4-2
3.57E-01
Fv (unitless)
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidle
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp valu
leman
. m Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
0.263427
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
( iMglg DW plant .j
/j.g/mL soil water
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight
basis by using a moisture content of 87 percent.
B-2-10
4.95E+04
fj.g/g soil
BrrooHB, value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value
provided in this table.
B-2-10
9.65E-01
(
pg/g DW plant.
pglg soil
Br value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the KM value that is provided in this table.
B-2-9
3.87E-03
DW plant.
jj.glg soil
Brf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
B-3-9
3.87E-03
/j.g/g air
Bvag value was obtained from Lorber (1995). No distinction was made between
aboveground produce and forage.
B-2-8
4.60E+04
Bv
'forage
(//g/g DW plant^
air
Bvforage value was obtained from Lorber (1995). No distinction was made
n aboveground produce and forage.
B-3-8
4.60E+04
A-3-547
-------
TABLE A-3-159
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
2^,4,7,8-PENTACHLORODIBENZO(P)FURAN (57117-31-4)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
BaM (day/kg FW)
flaw(day/kgFW)
Bctf^ (day/kg FW)
Sa*t
(OcgFW tissue)
(L$g?W tissue)
BCFj*
(Ukg FW tissue)
AflSwOAgFW)
jRS4FM
(unitless, lipid based)
Reference and Explanation
£*{|iifiiioii£
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
U.S. EPA (1995a)
Ba^ value was calculated by increasing Bamllk values by a factor of 5.43, as
discussed in Section A3.3.14.
Bapork value was calculated by increasing Bamm values by a fector of 6.57, as
discussed in Section A3.3.15.
BOfg- value was calculated by multiplying the BCF value for chicken eggs by a
chicken soil consumption rate of 0.02 kg (DW)/day (See Appendix A-3). BCF
value for eggs was obtained from Stephens, Petreas, and Hayward (1995) for the
high exposure chicken group.
^fl<*fcbn value was calculated by multiplying the BCF value for chicken by a
chicken soil consumption rate of 0.02 kg (DW)/day (See Appendix A-3). BCF
value for chicken was obtained from Stephens, Petreas, and Hayward (1995) for
the high exposure chicken group.
-
-
U.S. EPA (1994a)
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Other Parameters
7*£F(unitless)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
—
Health Benchmarks
Oral CSF (mg/kg/day)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
/yD (mg/kg/day)
Inhalation URFfa&m3)-1
/yCfag/m5)
-
-
-
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
9.00E-03
4.89E-02
5.91E-02
5.61E-02
7.32E-02
NA
NA
9.00E-02
0.50
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Note:
NA-Not Applicable
ND «• No Data Available
All parametere are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-548
-------
TABLE A-3-160
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR PENTACHLOROBENZENE (608-93-5)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties
JWJF(g/mole)
Tm(V
Vp(atiri)
S(mg/L)
H (atm-mVmol)
A,(cm2/s)
Av(cm2/s)
Km (unitless)
A^(mL/g)
JOUonVg)
#4,w value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd,,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil. •
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the K«. value that is provided in
this table.
.Ktf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koq mat is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate KdM because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^, value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kdbs value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
-
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
Value
250.34
358.1
3.10E-06
at25°C
(solid)
3.20E-02
2.43E-02
1.86E-02
7.34E-06
1.22E+05
3.21E+04
3.21E+02
2.41E+03
1.29E+03
A-3-549
-------
TABLE A-3-160
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR PENTACHLOROBENZENE (608-93-5)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation : ".*•'-
Equations
Vsiluc
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)"1
Fv (unitless)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that
are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
7.33E-01
0.999951
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, t*g/g DW plant ,
'ftg/mL soil water'
***notvff
^fjgfg DW plant j
Uglg soil
Br^
.tfgig DW plant ,
Uglg soil
*W
^g/g DW plant ^
vsfg s°>i
**«
,Hg(g DW plant v
VSte olr
*w
^ttgtg DW plant j
pglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the £_, value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Br^^g value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table.
Br^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Br&
-------
TABLE A-3-160
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR PENTACHLOROBENZENE (608-93-5)
(Page 3 of 3)
ParanieteF
Reference and Explanation ~ ':.•-,
Equations .
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamilt (day/kg FW)
Bo** (day/kg FW)
AV* (day/kg FW)
5aear (day/kg FW)
Ai^,, (day/kg FW)
BCFw
(L/kg FW tissue)
JMFjwOL/kgFW)
BSAFfek (unitless)
Bamttk value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table. • ,
Bobeef value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ .that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988): Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
fia t value was calculated by using tiiethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
anomultiplying it with the Ba^ value. ' '
Ba... value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table. .
Bachichm value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
- ' . .
BAFs were used for compounds with a log Km value above 4.0, as cited in U.S. EPA
(1995b). BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying a food chain
multiplier (FCtif) with a geometric mean of various laboratory measured BCFs
obtained from various experimental studies cited hi U.S. EPA (1998). FCMs were
obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc>— See Appendix A-3.
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Value
9.72E-04
3.07E-03
3.72E-03 .
9.72E-01
2.43E-03
NA
3.61E+04
NA
Health Benchmarks
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
RfC(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/rn3)'1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
U.S. EPA (1997b) ,
- ' ' '
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of70kg.
- .
' -
C-I-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
8.0E-04
ND
2.8E-03
ND
ND
Note: .
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-551
-------
TABLE A-3-161
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR PENTACHLORONITROBENZENE (82-68-8)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MF(g/mo!e)
rm(K)
*Katm)
S(mg/L)
#(atnvmVmol)
Z>.(cm2/s)
A»(cmVs)
^(unitless)
/^(mL/g)
A'eUmL/g)
A-„ value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database, U.S. EPA (1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994f).
KK value was calculated by using the correlation equation with JS^, for all
nom'onizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). KK value was calculated by using the recommended KL, value
that is provided hi this table.
Kd. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kdg, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to sue
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in this table.
Kdj, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 hi bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
_
—
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
—
—
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
:/ •" ;'vyuii •' *s
295.36
417.1
3.1E-06
at25°C
(solid)
3.20E-02
2.86E-02
1.87E-02
5.0E-06
4.37E+04
5.89E+03
5.89E401
4.42E+02
2.36E+02
A-3-552
-------
TABLE A-3-161
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR PENTACHLORONITROBENZENE (82-68-8)
(Page 2 of 3)
parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using S, Tm and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-l;B-2-l;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Value
3.62E-01
0.999987
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, fj.g/g DW plant .
* /j.g/mL soil water'
"^root veg
^glgDW plant ^
jug/g soil
Br^
,/j.g/g DW plant.
Vg/g soil
Brforage
^glg DWplant^
pglg soil
Bvag
^g/g DWplant^
Vg/g air
Bvforage
,Hglg DW plant^
\ , . >
pglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroo.ve value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table (see section A3.4.2 of Appendix A-3).
Br value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
Brfa value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in "Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KW value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided in this
table.
Bvtoragf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, and /f that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the Hand Km values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
8.75E+02
1.49E+01
8.06E-02
8.06E-02
1.71E-01
1.71E-01
A-3-553
-------
TABLE A-3-161
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR PENTACHLORONITROBENZENE (82-68-8)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation !:
Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^n (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
fla^j (day/kg FW)
#0^ (day/kg FW)
SafAfeta(day/kgFW)
(L/kgFW tissue)
fl/Lfyrt (L/kgFW)
BSAFfj, (unitless)
Bami;t value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided hi this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided hi this table.
BOj^ value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Babttf value (see section A3 .4.2 of Appendix A-3).
Ba value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
Ba&Ma, value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A3 .4.3 of Appendix A-3).
-
BAFs were used for compounds with a log K^, value above 4.0, as cited in U.S. EPA
(1995bJ. BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying a food chain
multiplier (FCM) with a geometric mean of various laboratory measured BCFs
obtained from various experimental studies cited in U.S. EPA (1998). FCMs were
obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc) — See Appendix A-3.
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
3.47E-04
1.10E-03
1.33E-03
3.47E-01
8.66E-04
NA
4.65E+02
NA
Health Benchmarks
RfD (mg/kg/day)
OralCSF
(mg/kg/dsy)'1
,J$/C(ing/m3)
Inhalation URF
U
-------
TABLE A-3-162
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR PENTACHLOROPHENOL (87-86-5)
(Page 1 of 4)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation - '
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
r»(K)
Fp(atm)
J. X -
S(mg/L)
H (atm-mVmol)
D0 (cm2/s)
£>w(cm2/s)
KM, (unitless)
^(mL/g)
^(mL/g)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
H value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database, U.S. EPA (1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database, U.S. EPA (1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
For all ionizing organics, J£_ values were estimated on the basis of pH. Estimated
values were obtained from U.S. EPA (1994c).
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0( that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01. in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kda
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Equations
~
-
_
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
Value
266.35
463
7.11E-07
at 25°C
(solid)
1.34E+01
1.41E-05
1.56E-02
8.01E-06
1.20E+05
oH K..
1 19,949
2 19,918
3 19,604
4 16,942
5 7,333
6 1,417
7 504.9
8 408.7
9 399.1
10 398.1
11 398.0
12 398.0
13 398.0
14 398.0
EH KOC
1 199.5
2 199.2
3 196.0
4 169.4
5 73.33
6 14.17
7 5.05
8 4.09
9 3.99
10 3.98
11 3.98
12 3.98
13 3.98
14 3.98
A-3-555
-------
TABLE A-3-162
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR PENTACHLOROPHENOL (87-86-5)
(Page 2 of 4)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation '-.' '•.•'• ' f: '••'•'*'•
Equations
::;-. Valne-^
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
«k
-------
TABLE A-3-162
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR PENTACHLOROPHENOL (87-86-5)
(Page 3 of 4)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Biotransfer Factors for Plants (Continued)
Srforage
^glg DW plant.
Pg/g soil
Bvag
^glg DWplant^
/J.g/g air
^vfcrage
^fig/g DWplant^
Uglg air
Bi jorage value was calculated by using the correlation equation withX^, that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and # that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature(T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided in this
table.
Bvf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and /fthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the HandK^ values that are provided in this
table.
Equations
Value
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
4.48E-02
1.02E+03
1.02E+03
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamm (day/kg FW)
5a^(day/kgFW)
Bafark (day/kg FW)
Baeggs (day/kg FW)
Bachlcka, (day/kg FW)
BCFju,
(L/kgFW tissue)
Atf^OL/kgFW)
BSAFfrk (unitless)
Bamttk value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Boi^f value was calculated by using the correlation equation vnihKm that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ba -rk value was calculated by using thethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Ba value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
BaMaxn value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Baterf value.
• ' '
BAFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value above 4.0, as cited in U.S. EPA
(1995b). BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying a food chain
multiplier (FCM) with a geometric mean of various laboratory measured BCFs
obtained from various experimental studies cited in U.S. EPA (1998). FCMs were
obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc) — See Appendix A-3.
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
9.55E-04
3.02E-03
3.66E-03
9.55E-01
2.39E-03
NA
3.97E+02
NA
A-3-557
-------
TABLE A-3-162
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR PENTACHLOROPHENOL (87-86-5)
(Page 4 of 4)
Parameter
fyD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
^C(mgAn3)
Inhalation URF
(jug/m5)-'
Inhalation CSF
(rag/kg/day)'1
Reference and Explanation
Equations '
> Value
Health Benchmarks
U.S. EPA (1997c)
U.S. EPA (1997b)
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
Calculated from Oral CSF using an inhalation rate of 20 ms/day and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
Value based on the Oral CSF assuming route-to-route extrapolation
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
3.0E-02
1.2E-01
1.1E-01
3.4E-05
1.2E-01
Note:
NA « Not applicable
ND «• No data available
All parameters are defined in of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-558
-------
TABLE A-3-163
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR PHENANTHRENE (85-01-8)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MW(g/mole)
r*
-------
TABLE A-3-163
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR PHENANTHRENE (85-01-8)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Eauations
Valu
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
/ fg/g DW plant .
' ' soil water
RCF value was calculated by using the conrelation equation with K^, that is cited
in Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight
basis by using a moisture content of 87 percent.
7.47E+02
Br,
DW plant
.
BrroofM value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value
provided in this table.
B-2-10
1.49E+00
,/jg/gDW plant.
(Jgtg soil
that is cited
Br™ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that i
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the Kw value that is provided in this table.
B-2-9
9.08E-02
,Hglg DW plant.
soil
Brjoragf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the !£„, value that is provided in this table.
B-3-9
9.08E-02
AW
.Hgfg DW plant.
figlg air
BVty value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K i
is cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Gen
J~±n»m Ot.nw.n.11^. /"•*,« !,.«.._: 1 \7Z~.1^1 /tf\f\^\. J.1 J • if.- 1
and H that
T6t 611*3-
Gaggi, Chemello, Calamari, and"Vighi (19*52); then'reducing this value by a
factor of 100. No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce
and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C,
by using the Hand K^ values that are provided in this table.
B-2-8
2.08E-02
,Hgtg DW plant.
air
g, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K and H
that is cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira,
Gaggi, Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a
factor of 100. No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce
and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C,
by using the Hand K^, values that are provided in this table.
B-3-8
2.08E-02
A-3-560
-------
TABLE A-3-163
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR PHENANTHRENE (85-01-8)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
BamUk (day/kg FW)
Ba^day/kgFW)
Btfak (day/kg FW)
Baegg (day/kg FW)
5flctetol (day/kg FW)
*CFj»
(L/kg FW tissue)
5^F^(L/kgFW)
BSAFf,,, (unitless)
Ba^jt value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A^ that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
Bat^f value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
Ba^rt value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Baeg, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is
citea in California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
BaMchm value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef
(15/19) and multiplying it with the Babe^r value.
- -
Default BAF value recommended for use by U.S. EPA (1995b), when literature
data were not available.
- ' '
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
2.82E-04
8.92E-04
1.08E-03
2.82E-01
7.04E-04
NA
3.30E+03
NA
Health Benchmarks
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF (mg/kg/day)'1
jR/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF (Mg/m3)'1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
_
-
~
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
ND
NA
ND
NA
NA
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-561
-------
TABLE A-3-164
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR PHENOL (108-95-2)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations :
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MFCg/mole)
r«„ value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
For all ionizing organics, K.c values were estimated on the basis of pH. Estimated
values were obtained from U.S. EPA (1994c).
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 m soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value vanes, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Kx value that is provided in
this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdm because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in this table.
-
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
—
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
94.11
314.0
5.74E-04
at25°C
(solid)
9.08E+04
5.95E-07
8.27E-02
1.03E-05
3.00E+01
EH K
1 221)
2 22.0
3 22.0
4 22.0
5 22.0
6 22.0
7 22.0
8 21.8
9 20.0
10 11.2
11 2.27
12 0.51
13 0.32
14 0.30
2.20E-01
1.65E+00
A-3-562
-------
TABLE A-3-164
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR PHENOL (108-95-2)
(Page 2 of 3)
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
MXcmVg)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
RCF
, pg/g DW plant -
^ fj.g/mL soil water'
BrrQ01 veg
/*&'£ so"
Brag
,(tg/g DW plant ,.
Uglg soil
,/J.g/g DW plant \
fMglg soil
Bvag
(Mg/g DW plant ^
fj-g/g air
BVforage
,y.glg DW plant ^
fj.g/g air
Kdb value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^ that is cited in
U.s! EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 hi bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life hi soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that
are provided hi this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Br^n value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
hi tiiis fable.
Br value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Brf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided hi this table.
Bv value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
citea in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided in tins table.
Bvf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, and H that is
citeTui Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, andVighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25"C, by using the H
and Km values mat are provided in this table.
'. Equations
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-l;B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
B-2-10
B-2-9; B-2-10;
B-3-9
B-2-9
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
Value
8.79E-01
2.53E+01
0.999999
9.50E+00
4.32E+01
5.42E+00
5.42E+00
3.52E+00
3.52E+00
A-3-563
-------
TABLE A-3-164
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR PHENOL (108-95-2)
Parameter
JJfiUa (day/kg FW)
80^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
fia,^ (day/kg FW)
&Wta (day/kg FW)
JJCPV
(Meg FW tissue)
MF^(UkgFW)
BSAF^ (unitless)
/yD (mg/kg/day)
0ra/ CSF
mg/kg/day)'1
/5/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
fcg/m3)-'
nhalatlon CSF
(m^/kg/day)'1
Reference and Explanation
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamet value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K
value that is provided in this table. ""
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K
value that is provided in this table.
5ap°rjt value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Ba{iv value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
CaliTornia EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the AL, value
that is provided in this table.
•ffffrffcta value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation with K^,
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980)— See Appendix A-3.
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Health Benchmarks
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
2.38E-07
7.54E-07
9.12E-07
2.38E-04
5.95E-07
7.81E+00
NA
NA
6.0E-01
ND
2.1E+00
ND
ND
Note:
NA-Not applicable
ND- No data available
All parameters arc defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-564
-------
TABLE A-3-165
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR PRORATE (298-02-2)
(Page lot 3)
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
Tm(K)
Vp(atm)
S(mg/L)
//(atnvmVmol)
A,(cm2/s)
Z)w(cm2/s)
KM, (unitless)
Kac(mL/g)
Kds(cm3/g)
X%»(L/Kg)
Aa4j(cm3/g)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
—
Vp value cited in Montgomery and Welkom (1991).
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MJV, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Devalue was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoffand Long (1995).
K value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ for phthalates
and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans,
cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). Koc value was calculated by using the recommended Km
value that is provided in this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K,,. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon m sou.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided m
this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kdb value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.s! EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
* Equations
-
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
'
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
, Value
260.4
ND
1.70E-06
at25°C
(liquid)
3.80E401
1.16E-05
2.05E-02
5.88E-06
6.46E403
1.33E+03
1.33E-H)1
9.96E+01
5.31E+01
A-3-565
-------
TABLE A-3-165
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR PHORATE (298-02-2)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations | Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Ksg value was assumed to be zero due to a lack of data.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
0.0
Fv (unitless)
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in the table.
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
0.999650
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
DW plant
* UglmL soil water
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Bnggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
B-2-10
2.06E+02
Br,
tearrtg
,t*glg DWplant.
?rnw*z value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
B-2-10
1.55E+01
DW plant
ftg/g soil
.
flr^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation withKm that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^, value that
is provided in this table.
B-2-9
2.43E-01
DW plant
(*g/g sott
.
?r&°** value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
•alue that is provided in this table.
B-3-9
2.43E-01
,t*g/g DW plant.
air
_ Rvalue was calculated by using the correlation equation with/:..., and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor oflOO.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
B-2-8
5.48E+01
Bv,
. DW plant.
pgfg air
,vforfgf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K...., and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calaman, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and K^ values that are provided in this table.
B-3-8
5.48E+01
A-3-566
-------
TABLE A-3-165
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR PHORATE (298-02-2)
Bamilk (day/kg FW)
5a^(day/kgFW)
B0park (day/kg FW)
fiaegs (day/kg FW)
Bachickm (day/kg FW)
5CF^
(L/kg FW tissue)
&4FM(L/kgFW)
S&4F^fc (unitless)
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Ora/ CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
/J/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
Reference and Explanation
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba % value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^er value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba rk value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba,^ value.
Ba value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
Bachickm value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
US EPA(1995b). BCFm value calculated using the correlation equation with Km
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980)— See Appendix A-3.
—
—
Health Benchmarks
U.S.EPA (1997c)
-
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 m3/day and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
- . '•-.'...
- • • .-:' ' • ' ' -
Equations
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2 '
Value
5.13E-05
1.62E-04
1.96E-04
5.13E-02
1.28E-04
4.63E+02
NA
NA
2.0E-04
ND
7.0E-04
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-567
-------
TABLE A-3-166
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR PHTHALIC ANHYDRIDE (85-44-9)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MF(g/mole)
2"mCK)
J>(atm)
5(mg/L)
/T(atm>m3/niol)
£«(cmVs)
Z>w(cmVs)
^(unltless)
/^(mUg)
&/, (cmVg)
«k(L/Kg)
A'«k (crnVg)
Reference and Explanation :
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, andHeckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Howard (1989-1993)
Howard (1989-1993)
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
D, value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
£>„ value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
NCDEHNR(1997)
K.,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, for all
nomonizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). A^. value was calculated by using the recommended Km value
that is provided in this table.
Kd. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kof that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kdn
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Kac value that is provided in
this table.
Kdg, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0, that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the K^. value that is provided in this table.
Kdb value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kac that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used_to calculate Kd^ because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by using the
KK value that is provided in this table.
—
..
-
—
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
..
—
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
148.11
403.9
2.63E-07
at25°C
(solid)
6.20E+03
6.28E-09
4.04E-02
8.97E-06
2.5E-01
4.80E-01
4.80E-03
3.60E-02
1.92E-02
A-3-568
-------
TABLE A-3-166
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR PHTHALIC ANHYDRIDE (85-44-9)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation '
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg(ysai)'1
Fv (unitless)
Ksgvalue was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using S, Tm, and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-l;B-2-l;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Value
1.35E404
0.999797
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, fj.g/g DW plant .
* /j.g/mL soil water'
^^roolveg
^g/g DWplant^
/j.g/g soil
Brag
,/ig/g DW plant j
/j.g/g soil
Brforagf
,V.glg DW plant.
Hg/g soil
Bvag
^glg DW plant )
fj.g/g air
Bvforage
,Hg/g DW plant j
V-glg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Brrool value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table.
Br value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in mis table.
Brfaa- value was calculated by using the correlation equation withJS^, that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with-K^ and .fiTthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and K^ values that are provided in this
table. .
Bvforfg. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and //that is
citeoin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
6.39E+00
1.33E+03
8.63E+01
8.63E+01
2.03E+00
2.03E+00
A-3-569
-------
TABLE A-3-166
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR PHTHALIC ANHYDRIDE (85-44-9)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
BaM (day/kg FW)
flaw (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Bam (day/kg FW)
5«Ufct«(day^gFW)
BCFf*
(Uk&FW tissue)
&4FM(UkgFW)
BSAFfub (unitless)
^D(mg/kg/day)
Qra/CSF
(mg/kg/day)*1
/^(mg/m*)
Inhalation URF
Ougto')'1
inhalation CSF
(nig/kg/day)'1
Sa^,t value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
£«„_ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
•&W« value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba,^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation withA^,
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
1.99E-09
6.28E-09
7.60E-09
1.99E-06
4.96E-09
2.05E-01
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
U.S.EPA(1997c)
-
U.S. EPA (1997c)
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
2.0E+00
ND
1.2E-01
ND
ND
Note:
NA •> Not applicable
ND - No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-570
-------
TABLE A-3-167
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR PRONAMIDE (23950-58-5)
(PaeelofS)
"Pswii wi fitci*'
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties
MT(g/mole)
rm(K)
Vp(atin)
S(mg/L)
/r(atm-m3/mol)
A,(cm2/s)
Dw(cm2/s)
Km (unitless)
^(mL/g)
Xa,(cm3/g)
^(L/Kg)
«4 (cmVg)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1 995b)
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b)
H value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Dw value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995)
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans, cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). Koc value was calculated by using the recommended Km value
that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd,,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Kx value that is provided in
this table.
Kdm value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate KdM because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdw value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kdj., value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by
using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Equations
-
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
"
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
Value
256.13
428.1
5.30E-07
at25°C
(solid)
1.50E+01
9.05E-06
4.71E-02
5.45E-06
3.24E+03
7.74E+02
7.74E+00
5.81E+01
3.10E+01
A-3-571
-------
TABLE A-3-167
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR PRONAMIDE (23950-58-5)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation ,:
Equations
- Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)"1
A*(unitless)
Ksg value was assumed to be 0 due to a lack of data.
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that
are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
0.0
0.999942
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
. fJgfg DW plant .
*t*g/mL soil water"
Br,^^
.Uglg DW plant.
pg/g soil
Br«
^tigtg DW plant.
l*Slg soil
*W
.ftgtg DW plant.
ffg/g SOil
*W
^gfg DWplant^
Hgig air
Bv^
^g/gDW plant j
(tg/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
jfrnopor value w38 calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table.
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Anns (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
Br&agf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
K^ value that is provided in this table.
Bv^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and K^, values that are provided in this table.
BVfomf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
citedin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided hi this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.23E402
1.59E+01
3.62E-01
3.62E-01
3.38E+01
3.38E+01
A-3-572
-------
TABLE A-3-167
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR PRONAMIDE (23950-58-5)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation • • :
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bama, (day/kg FW)
5aw(day/kgFW)
Bapork (day/kg FW)
Baea, (day/kg FW)
&%«„ (day/kg FW)
*GFj»
(L/kg FW tissue)
AiF^CL/kgFW)
BSiF^ (unitless)
IteUtt value was calculated by using the correlation equation withX^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Bat,,,* value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^rk value was calculated by using thethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
.Ba^-j value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Califrnia EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
BacMam value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation with Km
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
-
-
Equations
Value
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
2.57E-05
8.13E-05
9.84E-05
2.57E-02
6.42E-05
2.74E+02
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RJD (mg/kg/day)
OralCSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
/Z/U(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
~
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
~
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
7.5E-02
ND
2.6E-01
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-573
-------
TABLE A-3-168
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR PYRENE (129-00-0)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
'••,. '--••--''••-
Reference and Explanation ; "
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/roole)
r«(K)
F/»(ata>)
£(mg/L)
//(atnvmVmol)
£>.(cmj/s)
A,(cmJ/s)
A^, (unttless)
KKfaL/g)
A'4(cmVg)
flkCMKg)
A'<4,(cmVg)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1992a).
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1992a).
H value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
De value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
£>„ value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0( that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd,,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Kac value that is provided in
this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. 'Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the KK value that is provided in this table.
Kdja value was calculated by using the correlation equation with KOI. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon hi bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the K«. value that is provided in this table.
-
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
'
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
Value
202.24
429.1
7.36E-12
at25°C
(solid)
1.30E-01
1.14E-08
2.72E-02
7.14E-06
l.OOE+05
6.80E+04
6.80E+02
5.10E+03
2.72E+03
A-3-574
-------
TABLE A-3-168
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR PYRENE (129-00-0)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Mackay,
Shiu,andMa(1992)
Fv value was calculated 'by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that
are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a liquid
phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, pg/g DW plant .
" iJ-glmL soil -water'
,/ig/g DW plant.
Uglg soil
,/jg/g DW plant.
/j.g/g soil
,^glg DW plant.
fj,g/g soil
,/ig/g DW plant.
fj.g/g air
,/J.g/g DW plant.
Uglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in tnis table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Brmo, value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this fable.
Bra, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Br^age value was calculated by using the correlation equation •vnSa.Km> that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
Bva value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and /fthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
Bvf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A^» and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
, Value
1.33E-01
0.196376
1.66E+03
2.44E+00
4.98E-02
4.98E-02
1.04E+06
1.04E+06
A-3-575
-------
TABLE A-3-168
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR PYRENE (129-00-0)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations ] Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
BaM (day/kg FW)
5aw(day/kgFW)
flo^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^,(day/kgFW)
•&»««£*», (day/kg FW)
BCFf»i.
(UkgFW tissue)
&4FM(UkgFW)
BSAFw (unitless)
tfa,^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with KM that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^,
value that is provided in this table.
Baicf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^j. value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Ba-Q value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Calnomia EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^, value
that is provided in this table.
^flrfttoi value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the jBaw value.
-
BAFs were used for compounds with a log Km value above 4.0, as cited in U.S. EPA
(1995b). BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying a food chain
multiplier (FCM) with an estimated BCF. BCFs were estimated using the
correlation equation obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980).
FCAfs were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc) — See Appendix A-3.
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
7.98E-04
2.52E-03
3.06E-03
7.98E-01
1.99E-03
NA
1.19E+04
NA
Health Benchmarks
4ff> (mgflcg/day)
OralCSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
/5/C(mg/m3)
Mialation URF
Oug/m1)-'
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-'
U.S.EPA (1997b)
-
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
3.0E-02
ND
1.1E-01
ND
ND
Note:
NA - Not applicable
ND - No data available
AH ptrsmeters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-576
-------
TABLE A-3-169
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR PYRIDBVE (110-86-1)
(Page 1 of3)
Parameter
MF(g/mole)
rffl(K)
J^j(atm)
S(mg/L)
/f(atnvm3/mol)
A,(cm2/s)
A,(cm2/s)
JS^, (unitless)
AUOnL/g)
A%(cmVg)
AHLCI/Kg)
Atffo (cmVg)
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckehnan( 1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b)
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b)
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dv value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995)
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA^,,, for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans, cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). Koc value was calculated by using the recommended K^ value
that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kof that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kda
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the K^. value that is provided in
this table.
KdM value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^oc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kdjg value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 hi bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon hi bottom sediment. Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by
using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Equations
Value
-
-
—
--
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
"™
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
79.10
231.5
2.60E-02
at25°C
(liquid)
3.00E402
6.86E-03
1.10E-01
1.08E-05
4.68E+00
4.72E400
4.72E-02
3.54E-01
1.89E-01
A-3-577
-------
TABLE A-3-169
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR PYRIDEVE (110-86-1)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation , ' ;
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ftsg (year)"1
Fv (unitless)
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
Equations
Value
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-l;B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
3.61E+01
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, uglg DW plant ,
*Hg/mL soil water'
,fig/g DW plant >
Uglg soil
*Hgtg DW plant.
ftg/g soil
t l*gfg DW plant v
Uglg soil
-------
TABLE A-3-169
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR PYRIDBVE (110-86-1)
(Page 3 of 3)
PftrflHictcr
Bamilk (day/kg FW)
Ea,^ (day/kg FW)
B0pork (day/kg FW)
5aesg (day/kg FW)
BacWcfen (day/kg FW)
SCFjfc/,
(L/kg FW tissue)
AlFjuCL/kgFW)
BSAFfck (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
£am/ft value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Bdbeef value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km '
value that is provided in this table.
Ba ,* value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BaeK value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided m this table.
Bachickm value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation with 1^,
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
—
—
Health Benchmarks
#D (mg/kg/day)
Ora/ CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
je/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(ma/kg/day)'1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
~
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 nrYday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
-
~
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
Value
3.72E-08
1.18E-07
1.42E-07
3.72E-05
9.28E-08
1.90E+00
NA
NA
l.OE-03
ND
3.50E-03
ND
ND
Note:
NA= Not applicable
ND= No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-579
-------
TABLE A-3-170
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR RONNEL (299-84-3)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
WteAnole)
rm(K)
*>(atm)
S(mg/L)
//(atavm'/mol)
£>.(cmVs)
£>w(cms/s)
^(unitless)
^(mL/g)
J&UcmVg)
«k(L/Kg)
Reference and Explanation /;<: ::
Equations
:-"'.ViWe'.:""-'
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
-
-
__
D, value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
£>„ value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Recommended K^ value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995).
KK value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ for phthalates
and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans,
cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). KK value was calculated by using the recommended Km
value that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kda
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Kx value that is provided in
this table.
Kd-y, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with-K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the KK value that is provided in this table.
-
-
-
—
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
"
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
321.57
314.1
ND
ND
ND
4.05E-02
4.69E-06
1.17E+05
1.28E+04
1.28E402
9.56E+02
A-3-580
-------
TABLE A-3-170
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR RONNEL (299-84-3)
(Page 2 of 3)
PdT&lxicid*
XaUcnrVg)
fag (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Kdts value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kac that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Ksg value was assumed to be 0 due to a lack of data.
Fv value was assumed to be 1.0 due to a lack of data.
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, iMglg DW plant .
" [Ag/mL soil water'
Brrootveg
,IJ.glg DWplant^
pglg soil
Brag
,/Jg/g DW plant y
pg/g soil
Brforage
^glg DWplant^
pglg soil
BVleafr-Kg
,/j.g/g DW plant j
f-ig/g air
BVforage
,fj.g/g DW plant ^
pglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Brmlveg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
hi this table.
Bra value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Brteia e value was calculated by using the correlation equation with-K^, that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
Equations
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
Value
5.10E+03
0.0
1.000000
1.87E+03
1.46E+01
4.55E-02
4.55E-02
ND
ND
A-3-581
-------
TABLE A-3-170
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR RONNEL (299-84-3)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation ." r :'
Equations
''-•'Vain*'-":
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
So.^ (day/kg FW)
Boj^(day/kgFW)
Bo^jt (day/kg FW)
Bam (day/kg FW)
Atou. (day/kg FW)
tfCF**.
(L/kgFW tissue)
MF^(lAgFW)
BSAFw (unitless)
jBamaj value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using fee Km
value that is provided in this table.
Bataf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^,, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Bap,^. value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba,^ value.
J3a value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited hi
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
BaMam value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
-
BAFs were used for compounds with a log K^, value above 4.0, as cited in U.S. EPA
(1995b). BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying a food chain
multiplier (FCM) with an estimated BCF. BCFs were estimated using the
correlation equation obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980).
FCMs were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc>— See Appendix A-3.
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
9.33E-04
2.95E-03
3.57E-03
9.33E-01
2.33E-03
NA
1.53E+04
NA
Health Benchmarks
BJD (mg/kg/day)
0ra/ CSF
(mg/kg/day)1'
/?/C(mg/h)3)
Inhalation URF
(MSte')"
Mtalation CSF
(nig/kg/day)-'
U.S. EPA (1997c)
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
5.0E-02
ND
1.8E-01
ND
ND
Note:
NA-Not applicable
ND « No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-582
-------
TABLE A-3-171
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR SAFROLE (94-59-7)
(Page 1 of 3).
> Parameter
Referebce and Explanation
Equations -
Chemical/Physical Properties
MT(g/mole)
Tm(K)
Vp(atai)
S(mg/L)
J7(atm-m3/mol)
A,(cm2/s)
£Ucm2/s)
Km (unitless)
^(mL/g)
JEsUcmVg)
#4v(L/Kg)
Ai4, (cmVg)
Budavari, O'Neill, Smith, and Heckehnan (1989)
Budavari, O'Neill, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Rvalue cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
5 value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from WATERS model database (U.S. EPA 1995d).
Devalue was obtained from WATERS model database (U.S. EPA 1995d).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995).
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and flirans as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). Koc value was calculated by using the recommended Km value
that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kdg, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdm because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^, value
was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in this table.
Kdfo value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA^. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1 993d) for an assumed organic carbon of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be_
used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by using the
Koc value that is provided in this table.
-
- . . ,
—
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21 •.
B-4-20
_
B-l-3;B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
Value
162.18
284.1
1.10E-04
at25°C
(liquid)
1.50E-H)3
1.19E-05
4.06E-02
7.16E-06
4.57E402
1.68E+02
1.68E+00
1.26E+01
6.73E+00
A-3-583
-------
TABLE A-3-171
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR SAFROLE (94-59-7)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
!:;;:'Vataiev.,.
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)"1
Fit (unitless)
RCF
. ng/g DW plant ,
*HglmL soil water'
*»•«««»
^gtg DWplant^
Uglg soil
AW
.Hg/gDW plant j
pglg soil
Br/mtt
>pglg DW plant ^
fig/g soil
*W
,Mg/g DW plant j
Uglg air
Bv^.
.ygtg DW plant ^
fjg/g air
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-l;B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
9.03E+00
0.999995
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the JQ value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Brr(flvt. value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in thistable.
Br^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Aims (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
Brfea-e value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in "Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
Sv,. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with .8^ and /Tthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chernello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and K^ values that are provided in this
table.
BVfyn.. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and /fthat is
citedm Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 2S°C, by using the Hand K^ values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
3.23E+01
1.92E+01
1.12E+00
1.12E+00
3.20E+00
3.20E+00
A-3-584
-------
TABLE A-3-171
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR SAFROLE (94-59-7)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamttk (day/kg FW)
fiaw(day/kgFW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Baegg (day/kg FW)
&>^*. (day/kg FW)
*0k
(L/kg FW tissue)
&4FM(IAgFW)
BSAFfrh (unitless)
jfoUtt value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Babee{ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^rt value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Baeg, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited hi
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
Bachicken value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value below 4.0, as cited hi
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF** value calculated using the correlation equation with Km
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980)— See Appendix A-3,
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
3.63E-06
1.15E-05
1.39E-05
3.63E-03
9.06E-06
6.19E+01
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
fl/D (mg/kg/day)
Ora/ CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
J?/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
-
U.S. EPA (1995b)
~
Calculated from Oral CSF using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
Value based on Oral CSF assuming route-to-route extrapolation.
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
ND
1.80E-01
ND
5.10E-05
1.80E-01
Note:
NA= Not applicable
ND= No data available
All parameters are defined hi list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-585
-------
TABLE A-3-172
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR SELENIUM (7782-49-2)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
: Reference and Explanation .
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
7-mfK)
f£(atm)
Sfmg/L)
//(atm-mVmol)
A,(cm2/s)
A,(cmVs)
^(unitless)
tf«(mL/g)
A'd^mL/g)
A'4*(L/Kg)
A'di,(mL/g)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
All metals, except mercury, are assumed to be nonvolatile at ambient
temperatures.
All metals, except mercury, are assumed to be insoluble in water.
lvalue is assumed to be zero, because the Vp and S values are zero for all
metals, except mercury.
De value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
£>„ value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
-
Kd, value was obtained from U.S. EPA (1996a), which provides pH-based
values that were estimated by using the MINTEQ2 geochemical speciation
model.
Kd^ value is assumed to be same as the Kds value, because organic carbon does
not play a major role in sorption for the metals, as cited in U.S. EPA (1994f).
Kdfc value is assumed to be same as the Kds value, because organic carbon does
not play a major role in sorption for the metals, as cited in U.S. EPA (1994f).
-
Because they are nonvolatile, metals are assumed to be 100 percent in
participate phase and zero percent in the vapor phase, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994f).
-
-
~
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
--
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18;
B-4-24
B-4-16;
B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8;B-4-l;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
78.96
490.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.03E-01
1.20E-05
NA
NA
18atpH=4.9;
5.0atpH=6.8;
2.2 at pH=8.0
18atpH=4.9;
5.0 at pH=6.8;
2.2atpH=8.0
18atpH=4.9;
5.0atpH=6.8;
2.2 at pH=8.0
ND
0.000000
A-3-586
-------
TABLE A-3-172
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR SELENIUM (7782-49-2)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
I Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, jj,glg DW plant .
^ fj-glmL soil water'
B-2-10
ND
Br,
rootveg
, DW plant \
soil
BrnoKe value was calculated by multiplying the uptake slope factor with a
conversion factor of 2 x 10' g/ha soil. The uptake slope factor and the
conversion factor were obtained from U.S. EPA (1992b) for root vegetables.
B-2-10
2.20E-02
,
/j.g/g DW plant y
soil
Brag value for fruits was calculated by multiplying the uptake slope factor with
a conversion factor of 2 xlO9 g/ha soil. The uptake slope factor and the
conversion factor were obtained from U.S. EPA (1993e) for garden fruits. Brag
value for vegetables was calculated by weighting the uptake slope factors for
garden fruits (75%) and leafy vegetables (25%) and multiplying the result with
a conversion factor of 2 xlCr g/ha soil. The uptake slope factors and the
conversion factor were obtained from U.S. EPA (1993e). The weighted average
Brag value for aboyeground produce was obtained as follows: (1) Br^ values for
fruits combined with a human consumption rate of fruits of 1.44E-0 J kg/kg/day,
and (2) Br values for vegetables combined with a human consumption rate of
vegetables of 1.49E-03 kg/kg/day.
B-2-9
1.95E-02
DW plant
fj-glg soil
Br,b value was calculated by multiplying the uptake slope factor with a
conversion factor of 2 x 109 g/ha soil. The uptake slope factor and the
conversion factor were obtained from U.S. EPA (1992b) for leafy vegetables.
B-3-8
1.60E-02
Br.
grain
, DW plant,
soil
Br grain value was calculated by multiplying the uptake slope factors with a
conversion factor of 2 x 10' g/ha soil. The uptake slope factor and the
conversion factor were obtained from U.S. EPA (1992b) for grams/cereals.
B-3-8
2.00E-03
glg DWplant
^
Metals are assumed to not experience air-to-leaf transfer, as cited hi
U.S. EPA (1995b).
B-2-8
NA
Bv,
'forage
, DW plant,
Vg/g air
Metals are assumed to not experience air-to-leaf transfer, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b).
B-3-8
NA
A-3-587
-------
TABLE A-3-172
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR SELENIUM (7782-49-2)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
BamlA (day/kg FW)
.Ba^ (day/kg FW)
flfl^dayflcgFW)
5ow (day/kg FW)
£«*«** (day/kg FW)
BCFf^
(DTcgFW tissue)
B.4/^ (L/kg FW)
BSAFjM (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
''• -^Value'/ •:••:,;
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bama!t values were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995a) for cadmium, selenium, and
zinc. Values were calculated by dividing uptake slopes, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1992b; 1995a), by a daily consumption rate of 20 kilograms dry
weight per day and converting the result to a wet weight basis assuming a 87%
moisture content in milk. .
Ba^f values were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995a) for cadmium, selenium, and
zinc. Values were calculated by dividing uptake slopes, as cited in,
U.S. EPA (1992b; 1995a), by a daily consumption rate of 20 kilograms dry .
weight per day and converting the result to a wet weight basis assuming a 70%
moisture content in beef. '••
Ufl™* values were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995a) for cadmium, selenium, and
zinc. Values were calculated by dividing uptake slopes, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1992b; 1995a), by a daily consumption rate of 4.7 kilograms dry
weight per day.and converting the result to a wet 'weight basis assuming a 70%
moisture content in pork.
Batfg values were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995a) for cadmium, selenium, and
zinc. Values were calculated by dividing uptake slopes, as cited hi
U.S. EPA (1992b; 1995a), by a daily consumption rate of 0.2 kilograms dry
weight per day and converting the result to a wet weight basis assuming a 75%
moisture content in eggs.
BoMdfn values were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995a) for cadmium, selenium,
ana zinc. Values were calculated by dividing uptake. slopes, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1992b; 1995a), by a daily consumption rate of 0.2 kilograms dry
weight per day and converting the result to a wet weight basis assuming a 75%
moisture content hi chicken.
Geometric mean value obtained from various literature sources (see Appendix
A3.4),
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Health Benchmarks
R/D (mg/kg/day)
OralCSF
(mg/kg/day)-'
jyC (mg/m1)
Inhalation URF
fcg/m3)-'
Inhalation CSF
^mg/kg/day)-'
U.S. EPA (1997c)
-
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
- . .
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1 '
C-2-2
5.86E-03
2.27E-03
1.88E-01
1.13E+00
1.13E+00
1.29E+02
NA
NA
5.0E-03
ND
1..8E-02
ND
ND
Note: .
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-588
-------
TABLE A-3-173
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR SILVER (7440-22-4)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties
MT(g/mole)
Tm(°K)
Vp(atai)
5(mg/L)
//(atm-mVmol)
D. (cm2/s)
A,(cm2/s)
Km (unitless)
^(mL/g)
Kds(mL/g)
Kdm(L/Kg)
MXmL/g)
fog (year)'1
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
All metals, except mercury, are assumed to be nonvolatile at ambient
temperatures.
All metals, except mercury, are assumed to be insoluble in water.
H value is assumed to be zero, because the Vp and S values are zero for all
metals, except mercury.
Da value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
£>w value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
-
-
Kds value was obtained from U.S. EPA (1996a), which provides pH-based
values that were estimated by using the MINTEQ2 geochemical speciation
model.
KdM value is assumed to be same as the Kd, value, because organic carbon does
not play a major role in sorption for the metals, as cited in U.S. EPA (1994f).
Kdbs value is assumed to be same as the Kds value, because organic carbon does
not play a major role in sorption for the metals, as cited in U.S. EPA (1994f).
-
-
~
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6;'B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18;
B-4-24
B-4-16;
B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2;B-4-2
, Value
107.87
1,233.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
8.38E-02
9.71E-06
NA
NA
0.1atpH=4.9;
8.3atpH=6.8;
110atpH=8.0
0.1atpH=4.9;
8.3atpH=6.8;
110atpH=8.0
0.1atpH=4.9;
8.3 atpH=6.8;
110atpH=8.0
ND
A-3-589
-------
TABLE A-3-173
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR SILVER (7440-22-4)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation '
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
F» (unitless)
Because they are nonvolatile, metals are assumed to be 100 percent in
participate phase and zero percent in the vapor phase, as cited hi
U.S. EPA (1994f).
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, (Jtglg DW plant ,
"(tg/mL soil water'
t l*g/§ DW plant v
ffgfg soil
^gfg DW plant ^
Hg/g soil
,Hglg DW plant \
Hg/g soil
.Uglg DWplant^
t-tglg soil
,yg/g DWplant^
l*g/g air
BrnoMg value was obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984). Br
values for nonvegetative growth (such as tubers) hi Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and
Shor (1984) were used for Br^,^
Br^ value for fruits was obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984).
fir values for nonvegetative growth (reproductive) hi Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and
Shor (1984) were used for Br,g (fruits). Br^ value for vegetables was calculated
using data obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984). Br values for
nonvegetative (reproductive) growth and Bv values for vegetative growth
weighted as 75% (reproductive) and 25% vegetative (Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and
Shor [1984])— were used for Br^ (vegetables).
The weighted average Brag value for aboveground produce was obtained as
follows: (1) Bra. values for fruits combined with a human consumption rate of
fruits of 1.44E-03 kg/kg/day, and (2) Bra, values for vegetables combined with a
human consumption rate of vegetables of 1.49E-03 kg/kg/day.
fir^j, value was obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984). Bv
values for vegetative growth (such as leaves and stems) hi Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen,
and Shor (1984) were used for Brforage.
fir_,M value was obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984). fir
values for nonvegetative growth as recommended by Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and
Shor (1984) were used for Br^.
Metals are assumed to not experience air-to-leaf transfer, as cited hi
U.S.EPA(1995b).
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-8
B-3-8
B-2-8
Value
0.000000
ND
l.OOE-01
1.38E-01
4.00E-01
l.OOE-01
NA
A-3-590
-------
TABLE A-3-173
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR SILVER (7440-22-4)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
• > Reference and Explanation
Equations
• Value
Biotransfer Factors for Plants (Continued)
Bvforage
^glg DW plant ^
Mg/g air
Metals are assumed not to experience air-to-leaf transfer, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995V).
B-3-8
NA
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamllk (day/kg FW)
5aw(day/kg FW)
Bapork (day/kg FW)
Baesg (day/kg FW)
JJfldua,, (day/kg FW)
BCF^
(L/kgFW tissue)
Atf^OAgFW)
BSAFfl.h (unitless)
Bam!1t values were obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984) for all
metals, except cadmium, mercury, selenium, and zinc.
•B^W values were obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984) for all
metals, except cadmium, mercury, selenium, and zinc.
NCDEHNR(1997)
-
-
Geometric mean value obtained from various literature sources (see Appendix
A3.4).
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
2.0E-02
3.0E-03
ND
ND
ND
2.04E+02
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Ora/ CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
-R/C(mg/in3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
5.0E-03
ND
1.80E-02
ND
ND
Note:
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-591
-------
TABLE A-3-174
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR STRYCHNINE (57-24-9)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation : • ,>"
•Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
7*m(K)
*Hatm)
S(mg/L)
//(atm-m'/mol)
D. (cmz/s)
ZJUcmVs)
ATw(unitless)
A^CmL/g)
A'4(cmVg)
AX(L/Kg)
Xk4,(cm'/g)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
/fvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Devalue was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995).
KB, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with AT^ for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxhis, and furans as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). KOC value was calculated by using the recommended K^ value
that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A",,,, that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd,,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd,y, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kol. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the KM value that is provided in this table.
KeL, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by
using the KK value that is provided in this table.
-
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
—
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
334.40
541.1
2.20E-13
at25°C
(solid)
1.50E+02
4.90E-13
1.38E-02
5.58E-06
8.51E+01
4.53E+02
4.53E-01
3.40E+00
1.81E+00
A-3-592
-------
TABLE A-3-174
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR STRYCHNINE (57-24-9)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991)
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using S, Tm and Vp values
mat are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
< Equations
Value
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
9.03E+00
0.085669
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, jMglg DW plant .
" fjiglmL soil water'
fizgig DW plant \
/j,g/g soil
,pglg DW plant ^
Uglg soil
Bfforage
,t*g/g DW plant -.
Hg/g soil
,liglg DW plant \
jj.glg air
,/ig/g DWplant^
Uglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K,,w value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroo. value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this fable (see section A4.3.2 of Appendix A-3).
Br value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
T*Tf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
hi Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made Between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KO, value that is provided in this table.
Bv value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and #that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vight (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Kow values that are provided hi this
Bvfo_ge value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited m Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vight (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided hi this
table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.34E+01
2.96E+01
2.97E+00
2.97E400
1.29E+07
1.29E+07
A-3-593
-------
TABLE A-3-174
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR STRYCHNINE (57-24-9)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation i ;
Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamg!t (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
£0^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^, (day/kg FW)
J&U^ (day/kg FW)
5CF^
(L/kg7FW tissue)
MFM(UkgFW)
BS.IFfl,,, (unitless)
jBfl,,^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Batttf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ba • t value was calculated by using thethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
ana multiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A4.3.2 of Appendix A-3).
2?a_ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided m this table.
B^Mctai value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Babctf value (see section A4.3.3 of Appendix A-3).
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^, value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCFf,h value calculated using the correlation equation with K^
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
6.76E-07
2.14E-06
2.59E-06
6.76E-04
1.69E-06
1.72E+01
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RjD (mg/kg/day)
Ora/CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
/5/C(mg/rn3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m1)'1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70kg.
—
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
3.0E-04
ND
1.1E-03
ND
ND
Note:
NA «• Note applicable
ND - No data available
AH parameters arc defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-594
-------
TABLE A-3-175
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR STYRENE (100-42-5)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
r«(K)
Vp (atari)
5(mg/L)
//(atm-rnVmol)
A,(cm2/s)
A,(cm2/s)
X^, (unitless)
^(mL/g)
M(cm3/g)
*4v(L/Kg)
MXcmVg)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
//value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1 994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kdg, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate KdM because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kdbs value was calculated by using the correlation equation vn&iKoc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Equations
Value
-
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
104.14
242.5
8.21E-03
at25°C
(liquid)
2.57E+02
3.33E-03
7.73E-02
8.77E-06
8.49E+02
9.12E+02
9.12E+00
6.84E+01
3.65E+01
A-3-595
-------
TABLE A-3-175
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR STYRENE (100-42-5)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
; v; EiiHati^*;^K>-:V^Iue.:;-.v
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
fag- (year)"1
Fv (unitless)
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-l;B-2-l;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
9.03E+00
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, (ig!g DW plant ,
'(^g/rnL soil water
Br^^
^g/g DW plant.
Pg/g soil
*W
.Uglg DW plant.
" fg/g soil '
Br^f,
^tglg DWplant^
pglg soil
AW
^g/g DW plant j
ftg/g air
AW
>Hglg DW plant.
PSlg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
•Sr^M- value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table.
Br^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Br&me value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Kn, value that is provided in this table.
BVag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM values that are provided in this table.
Bvfrttf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, and H that is
citedin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggj, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chenaello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and K^ values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
4.81E+01
5.28E+00
7.85E-01
7.85E-01
2.21E-02
2.21E-02
A-3-596
-------
TABLE A-3-175
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR STYRENE (100-42-5)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamm (day/kg FW)
Ea^ (day/kg FW)
&V, (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
5^,.^ (day/kg FW)
tfCF^,,
(L/kgFW tissue)
A^,, (L/kgFW)
BSAFfch (unitless)
Bam(tt value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^,
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ef value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Bae value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
BacUcten value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation with ^
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
-
- '• .
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
6.74E-06
2.13E-05
2.58E-05
6.74E-03
1.68E-05
9.91E-+01
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Ora/C5F
(mg/kg/day)-1
RfC(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
~ .
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
2.0E-01
ND
l.OE+00
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-597
-------
TABLE A-3-176
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR2,3,7,8-TETRACHLORODIBENZO(P)DIOXIN
(1746-01-6)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
A0F(g/rnole)
Fm(K)
*Matm)
5(rag/L)
W(aUn-mVmol)
A,(cmVs)
Z>w(cmVs)
A^ (unitless)
/^(mL/g)
/TeUmL/g)
A'w value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
U.S. EPA (1994a)
KK value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for dioxins
and furans that is cited hi U.S. EPA (1994a; 1994b). Recommended value was
calculated by using the recommended K^ value that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil.
Measured organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to
calculate Kdp because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic
carbon in soil. Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the K. value
that is provided in this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with KK that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in
suspended sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific
to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies,
depending on the fraction of organic carbon hi suspended sediment.
Recommended Kdm value was calculated by using the K.. value that is provided
in this table.
Kdfr value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0 that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment Measured organic carbon hi bottom sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending
on the fraction of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value
was calculated by using the KK value that is provided in this table.
~
..
-
—
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
—
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18;B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
321.98
578.1
4.45E-11
at 25°C
(solid)
4.83E-04
1.60E-05
1.27E-02
6.81E-06
4.37E+06
2.69E+04
2.69E+04
2.02E+05
1.08E405
A-3-598
-------
TABLE A-3-176
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2,3,7,8-TETRACHLORODIBENZO(P)DIOXIN
(1746-01-6)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
- Equations
"Value -
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg value was. calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in
Mackay, Shiu, and Ma (1992). .
Fv value was calculated by using equations .cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using S, !„, arid Vp values
mat are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-2;B-2-2;
B-3-2;B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7;B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
4.29E-01
0.977776
Biotransfer Factors for Plants • '
RCF
, Mg/g DW plant ,
/j.g/mL soil water '
"rrool\eg
,(J,g/g DW plant-.
Mg/g soil
fUg/g DW plant.
fj-g/g soil
Brforage
,jj.glg DW plant.
Uglg soil
fizgig DW plant.
Uglg air
,/j.g/g DW plant.
/j.g/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that, is cited
in Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight
basis by using a moisture content of 87 percent.
Brrmav value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value
provided in this table.
.Br value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
Bfforagf value was calculated by using the .correlation equation with Km that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was obtained from Lorber (1995). No distinction was made between
aboveground produce and forage.
BVforage value was obtained from Lorber (1995). No distinction was made '
between aboveground produce and forage.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
3.01E+04
1.12E+00
5.62E-03
5.62E-03
6.10E+04
6.10E+04
A-3-599
-------
TABLE A-3-176
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2,3,7,8-TETRACHLORODIBENZO(P)DIOXIN
(1746-01-6)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
BamA (day/kg FW)
Baw (day/kg FW)
Ba^i (day/kg FW)
(L$g FW tissue)
£a«*fcUa
(iJgFW tissue)
SCF**
(LflcgFW tissue)
BAFf^dUkgFW)
BSAFw
(unitless, lipid based)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
=.---iv«h»l ':
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
U.S. EPA (1995a)
Ba^tf value was calculated by increasing BamUt values by a factor of 5.43, as
discussed in Section A3. 3. 14.
Sflport value was calculated by increasing Bamllli values by a factor of 6.57, as
discussed in Section A3.3.15.
Ba.— value was calculated by multiplying the BCF value for chicken eggs by a
chicken soil consumption rate of 0.02 kg (DW)/day (See Appendix A-3). BCF
value for eggs was obtained from Stephens, Petreas, and Hayward (1995) for the
high exposure chicken group.
£a/Mdt«c value was calculated by multiplying the BCF value for chicken by a
chicken soil consumption rate of 0.02 kg (DW)/day (See Appendix A-3). BCF
value for chicken was obtained from Stephens, Petreas, and Hayward (1995) for
the high exposure chicken group.
-
-
U.S. EPA (1994a)
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
l.OOE-02
5.43E-02
6.57E-02
5.42E-02
7.30E-02
NA
NA
9.00E-02
Other Parameters
72sF (unitless)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
-
1.00
Health Benchmarks
/?/D (mg/kg/day)
OralCSF
(mg/kg/day)-'
RfC(mg/mJ)
Inhalation URF
Oug/m5)-'
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
U.S.EPA(1997c)
-
U.S.EPA (1997c)
U.S.EPA (1997c)
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
ND
1.5E+05
ND
3.3E-08
1.5E+05
Note:
NA - Not Applicable
ND - No Data Available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-600
-------
TABLE A-3-177
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
2,3,7,8-TETRACHLORODIBENZO(P)FURAN (51207-31-9)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
"Reference and Explanation ' - ,
Equations'
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
r«(K)
Pp(atm)
5(mg/L)
//Xatm-mVmol)
A,(cm2/s)
A,(cm2/s)
KM, (unitless)
K^mLlg)
Kds(cm3/g)
*4»(L/Kg)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
U.S. EPA (1994a).
Da value was obtained from WATERS model database (U.S. EPA 1995d).
Dw value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
U.S. EPA (1992d)
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K-, for dioxins
and furans that is cited in U.S. EPA (1994a; 1994c). Recommended value was
calculated by using the recommended Km value that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil.
Measured organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to
calculate Kdg, because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic .
carbon in soil. Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Koc value
that is provided in this table.
KcL, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in •
suspended sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific
to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies,
depending on the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment.
Recommended Kd^, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided
hi this table.
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
305.98
500.1
1.97E-11
at 25°C
(solid)
4.19E-04
8.60E-06
1.79E-02
4.85E-06
3.39E+06
2.09E+06
2.09E+04
1.57E+05
A-3-601
-------
TABLE A-3-177
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
2£,7,8-TETRACHLORODIBENZO(P)FURAN (51207-31-9)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
A"4.(cmVg)
ksg (year)"'
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Equations | Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Kdt, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdts, because the value varies depending
on the fraction of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value
was calculated by using the K^. value that is provided in this table.
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in
Mackay, Shiu, and Ma (1992).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values
that are provided hi this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-l;B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8;B-4-l;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
8.36E+04
3.57E-01
0.767641
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, ligjg DW plant .
*"ltg/mL soil water'
.ttg/g DW plant.
Itg/g soil
.ftgfg DW plant.
pg/g soil
.f^g/g DW plant.
pg/g soil
*W
,f*g/g DW plant.
ttg/g air
,f*gl$ DW plant.
ftg/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight
basis by using a moisture content of 87 percent.
BrroofHg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value
provided in this table.
Br., value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA^, that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the K,,, value that is provided in this table.
Brfrygf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is
citedih Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km, value that is provided in this table.
Bv^ value was obtained from Lorber (1995). No distinction was made between
aboveground produce and forage.
Bv/jrog, value was obtained from Lorber (1995). No distinction was made
between aboveground produce and forage.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
2.48E-K)4
1.19E+00
6.51E-03
6.51E-03
8.10E+04
8.10E+04
A-3-602
-------
TABLE A-3-177
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR
2,3,7,8-TETRACHLORODIBENZO(P)FURAN (51207-31-9)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter | Reference and Explanation ' -
- Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamm (day/kg FW)
Baberf (day/kg FW)
Bapork (day/kg FW)
(L/ig FW tissue)
•BflgMcten
(L/kg FW tissue)
(L/kfW tissue)
Atf^OAgFW)
BWFjw
(unitless, lipid based)
U.S. EPA (1995a)
Bateef value was calculated by increasing Bamllk values by a factor of 5.43, as
discussed in Section A3 .3. 14.
Ba^ value was calculated by increasing Bamllk values by a factor of 6.57, as
discussed in Section A3 .3. 15.
Baegg value was calculated by multiplying the BCF value for chicken eps by a
chicken soil consumption rate of 0.02 kg (DW)/day (See Appendix A*3). BCF
value for eggs was obtained from Stephens, Petreas, and Hayward (1995) for the
high exposure chicken group.
^achickm value was calculated by multiplying the BCF value for chicken by a
chicken soil consumption rate of 0.02 kg (DW)/day (See Appendix A-3). BCF
value for chicken was obtained from Stephens, Petreas, and Hayward (1995) for
the high exposure chicken group.
'-
-
U.S. EPA (1994a)
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
3.00E-03
1.63E-02
1.97E-02
3.61E-02
5.63E-02
NA
NA
9.00E-02
Other Parameters
T£F (unitless)
U.S. EPA (1994a)
-
0.10
Health Benchmarks
Oral CSF (mg/kg/day)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
^D (mg/kg/day)
Inhalation C/RFOg/m3)-'
£/C (mg/m3)
-
-
-
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not Applicable
ND = No Data Available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-603
-------
TABLE A-3-178
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,2,4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE (95-94-3)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation -'.-•--
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
r*(K)
ypfrtin)
S(mg/L)
//(atnvm'/mol)
D.(cmVs)
A,(cmJ/s)
^(unitless)
A'«(mL/g)
J&UcmVg)
A'rfw(L/Kg)
A'<4,(cmVg)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
//value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Devalue was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Arithmetic mean value cited in KarickhofFand Long (1995).
Kgc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). KO,. value was calculated by using the recommended K^ value
that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd,,
because the value vanes, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd,y value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 m suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the KK value that is provided in this table.
Kd,y value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kac that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kdbr> because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by using the
KM value that is provided in this table.
~
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
— .
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
215.89
411.1
7.1E-06
at25°C
(solid)
1.30E+00
1.18E-03
2.11E-02
8.75E-06
4.36E+04
5.89E+03
5.89E+01
4.42E+02
2.36E+02
A-3-604
-------
TABLE A-3-178
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,2,4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE (95-94-3)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
fag (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using 5, Tm, and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
- Mg/g DW plant .
k /j.g/mL soil water'
n
"'root veg
(1*8/8 DW plant.
fj-glg soil
,Mg/g DW plant .
pglg soil
Brforage
,/J-g/g DW plant.
fig/g soil
BV°»g/gDW plant.
(j.g/g air
BVforage
/•Mg/g DW plant.
Mg/g air
^?CF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in tnis table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroot value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in mis table.
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^, value that
is provided in this table.
Brjmage value was calculated by using the correlation equation withjK^, that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi, .
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the Hand K^ values that are provided in this
table.
Bvforage value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and .fifthat is
cited, in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the Hand K^ values that are provided in this
table.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.41E+00
0.999994
8.75E-H)2
1.49E+01
8.06E-02
8.06E-02
4.14E+00
4.14E+00
A-3-605
-------
TABLE A-3-178
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,2,4,5-TETRACHLOROBENZENE (95-94-3)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^t (day/kg FW)
Bo^ (day/kg FW)
^jkfcim (day/kg FW)
£<^
-------
TABLE A-3-179
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE (630-20-6)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation ' ' '
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
rm(K)
Fp(atm)
S(mg/L)
^(atm-mVmol)
D. (cm2/s)
£>w(cm2/s)
Km (unitless)
^(mL/g)
Kd. (cmVg)
Kdm(UKg)
Kdts(Cm3/g)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991) »
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b)
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b)
H value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
£>„ value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995)
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans, cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). Koc value was calculated by using the recommended K^ value
that is provided hi this table.
Kds value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kof that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
KJL, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^Tos that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^, value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kdt, value was calculated by using the correlation equation vritiiKoc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon hi bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
.
-
~
- '
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
• -
—
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
167.85
230.1
1.60E-02
at25°C
(liquid)
1.10E+03
2.44E-03
3.15E-02
9.30E-06
4.27E+02
1.59E-H)2
1.59E+00
1.20E+01
6.37E+00
A-3-607
-------
TABLE A-3-179
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE (630-20-6)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Fv(unitless)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited to Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-l;B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
5.75E+00
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, fjtglg DW plant .
" uglmL soil water
,yg/g DW plant*
(tg/g soil
(Hgtg DW plant*
t*gfg soil
tfjg/g DW plant-.
fS/S s°tt
BV^g/g DW plant.
Pgtg air
^ygfg DW plant^
ftg/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided to tnis table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
•®rw* valu6 w38 calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
to mis table.
fir., value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided to this table.
Br^ng, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM, value that is provided to this table.
fiVa, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
cited to Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and K^ values that are provided to this table.
Bvfores? value w38 calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and /fthat is
citeoto Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
3.09E-H)1
1.94E+01
1.17E+00
1.17E+00
1.45E-02
1.45E-02
A-3-608
-------
TABLE A-3-179
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE (630-20-6)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Bamllt (day/kg FW)
-Baw(day/kgFW)
£0^ (day/kg FW)
5a^ (day/kg FW)
BacUdxn (day/kg FW)
*CFj»
(L/kg FW tissue)
&4^(L/kgFW)
BSAFfrh (unitless)
Reference and Explanation • :
Equations
Value <
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Samilt value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba k value was calculated by using thethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Babe^ value.
Baeg^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
Bachich*. value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^g value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation with Km
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980)— See Appendix A-3.
_ .. . . - ,. . ....
- . -. .
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
3.39E-06
1.07E-05
1.30E-05
3.39E-03
8.46E-06
5.87E401 ,
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RJD (mg/kg/day)
Ora/ CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
5/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997b)
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997c)
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
3.0E-02
2.6E-02
1.1E-01
7.4E-06
2.6E-02
Note:
NA = Not applicable ,
ND = No data available ,
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-609
-------
TABLE A-3-180
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE (79-34-5)
(Page 1 of 3)
Pftrsmctcr
Reference and Explanation >:
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
7*m(K)
Fp(s.tin)
S(mg/L)
//(atm-mVmoI)
Dt (cmVs)
A, (craVs)
A'«, (unitless)
A'«(mL/g)
A'
-------
TABLE A-3-180
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE (79-34-5)
O>age2of3)
Parameter
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
RCF
, f^g/g DW plant .
^ fj.g/mL soil water'
Brrootveg
^glg DWplant^
pglg soil
Bras
,/tg/g DW plant j
f^g/g soil
Bfforage
^glg DWplant^
V-glg soil
Bvag
,Hglg DW plant ^
V-glg air
Borage .
,fig/g DW plant^
\ , . >
pg/g air
' ' Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with-K^, that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroo.ve, value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table (see section A3 .4.2 of Appendix A-3).
Bra value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Brf r value was calculated'by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
Bv value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
citecl in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and K^ values that are provided in this
table.
Bvf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and K^ values that are provided in this
table.
Equations
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8;B-4-l;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
Value
5.75E+00
1.000000
8.80E+02
1.11E+03
8.02E-02
8.02E-02
1.33E+01,
1.33E+01
A-3-611
-------
TABLE A-3-180
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE (79-34-5)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Ba^t (day/kg FW)
5a^(day/kg FW)
.Sop^t (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
^fl^feto (day/kg FW)
tfc^
(UkgFW tissue)
JMFjtrtOIJkgFW)
BSAFju, (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
••' Rfliifltf orist ' : '" "'
•'•'""•'Value'"'''"'
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Baatl^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
BaiKf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^f. value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the 5aw value (see section A3 .4.2 of Appendix A-3).
Ba.gr value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using die K^ value
that is provided in this table.
B^Mdtm value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A3.4.3 of Appendix A-3).
-
BAFs were used for compounds with a log Km value above 4.0, as cited in U.S. EPA
(1995b). BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying a food chain
multiplier (FCM) with a geometric mean of various laboratory measured BCFs
obtained from various experimental studies cited in U.S. EPA (1998). FCMs were
obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc>— See Appendix A-3.
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
3.50E-04
1.105E-03
1.34E-03
3.50E-01
8.73E-04
NA
4.33E+03
NA
Health Benchmarks
RfD (mgflcg/day)
OralCSF
jng/kg/day)'1
^/C(mgAn3)
'nhalatlon URF
fcg/m3)-1
'nhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
-
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S.EPA(1997c)
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
ND
2.0E-01
ND
5.8E-05
2.0E-01
Note:
NA-Not applicable
ND - No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-612
-------
TABLE A-3-181
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR TETRACHLOROETHYLENE (127-18-4)
fPaeel of 3)
rPjH*3¥'tti ^tfil*
-' - Reference and ExDlanation - i Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties
MW(g/mole)
TW(K)
Vp(stia)
S(mg/L)
#(atm-m3/mol)
A,(cm2/s)
Dw(cm2/s)
KO, (unitless)
^(mL/g)
Kds(cm3/g)
^(L/Kg)
J&4, (cm3/g) .
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
# value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, 5, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from WATERS model database (U.S. EPA 1995d).
Devalue was obtained from WATERS model database (U.S. EPA 1995d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c) .
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (I996b).
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kof that is cited in
U.§. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd,,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in
this table.
K&~, value was calculated by using the correlation equation withAT0? that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1 993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdm because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended KdK value
was calculated by using the K^. value that is provided in this table.
Kdj, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdts value was calculated by
using the Kac value that is provided in this table.
-
•
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
/
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
Value
165.85
251.1
2.42E-02
at25°C
(liquid)
2.32E+02
1.73E-02
7.20E-02
8.20E-06
3.51E+02
2.65E+02
2.65E+00
1.99E401
1.06E+01
A-3-613
-------
TABLE A-3-181
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR TETRACHLOROETHYLENE (127-18-4)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
I jggu
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
lag (year)'1
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
7.03E-01
Fv (unitless)
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
> yglg DW plant .
* UglmL soil water
flCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Bnggs (1982V Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
B-2-10
2.75E+01
*"f
.yglg DWplant.
Uglg soil
value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd. value provided
in his table.
B-2-10
1.04E-03
tPSig DW plant.
figlg soil
Br^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^, value that
is provided in this table. -• «"
B-2-9
1.31E+00
DW plant
Uglg soil
Y3*11* was calculated by using the correlation equation with A^, that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
A"w value that is provided in this table.
B-3-9
1.31E+00
^ftglgDW plant.
ftg/g ah-
Bv^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
B-2-8
1.66E-03
DWplant
Byt»nf value Vlas calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
Uglg air
•)
B-3-8
100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage,
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
1.66E-03
A-3-614
-------
TABLE A-3-181
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR TETRACHLOROETHYLENE (127-18-4)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Ba^at (day/kg FW)
.Baw(day/kgFW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
5a^ (day/kg FW)
^w<:tol (day/kg FW)
aCFjw
(L/kg FW tissue)
AtFjMOAgFW)
BSdFjw, (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Equations •
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamm value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km,, that is cited in
Travis and Anns (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table. ' . : .
Babeef value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by .using the Km
value that is provided in this table. •
Bapark value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Ba value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993), Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided m this table.
BQcMcten vauie was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Babetf value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value below 4.0, as cited in. «
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated usihg the correlation equation vnthK^
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrbcelli, and Carol! (1980)— See Appendix A-3.
~ .
B-3-11
B-3-10 .
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
2.79E-06
8.82E-06
1.07E-05
2.79E-03
6.96E-06
5.06E+01
.NA
">fA
Health Benchmarks
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Qra/ CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
tyC (rag/in3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)"1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
U.S. EPA (19?7b) ; " ' ;
U.S.EPA (1997e) .
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg. _ .. .. . -
U.S.EPA (1997e)
U.S.EPA (1997e)
:c-i-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2 :
l.OE-02
5.2E-02
3.5E-02
5.8E-07
2.0E-03
Note: '• •-••.'•• • '• .•
NA= Not applicable
ND= No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-615
-------
TABLE A-3-182
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2,3,4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL (58-90-2)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
;-r-i:VaIuV '.'•'
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
r«(K)
*Matm)
S(rng/L)
#(atnvm'/nx>l)
Z)«(cmVs)
£>w(cmVs)
/^(unitless)
/^(mL/g)
AT4(cra}/g)
A'
-------
TABLE A-3-I82
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2,3,4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL (58-90-2)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations -
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
*4(cm/g)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Kdfo value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^T0<. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdts value was calculated by using the
Koc value that is provided in this table for a pH of 7.0.
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using S, Tm, and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
9.97
1.41
6.999968
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
• Pg/g DW plant .
' /j.g/mL soil water'
D-.
"'root veg
,Vg/g DW plant ^
. V t*g/g soil
Brag
,l*glg DW plant \
Hg/g soil
Brforage
pglg soil
,yg/g DWplant^
Uglg air
Bvforagc
(yug/g DW plant ^
/j.g/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation withX^, that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in tnis table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent. . ' ;
Brroo(veg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table (see section A4.3.2 of Appendix A-3).
Brag\alue: was calculated by using the correlation equation with/T^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
' produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
Brtgogt value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KW value that is provided iin this table.
Bva. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25 °C, by using the Hand Km values that are provided in this
table.
Bvfomgf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and /fthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25 °C, by using the H arid Km values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-3-9
B-3-8
4.83E+02
1.94E+02
1.27E-01
1.27E-01
1.39E+02
1.39E+02
A-3-617
-------
TABLE A-3-182
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2,3,4,6-TETRACHLOROPHENOL (58-90-2)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
So^j (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^t (day/kg FW)
5a^, (day/kg FW)
Sowfeto, (day/kg FW)
*CRn
(UkgTFW tissue)
Atf^CL/kgFW)
flStf^rt (unitless)
5a-tt value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^,
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ba ' t value was calculated by using thethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^^ value (see section A4.3.2 of Appendix A-3).
5a™ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^, value
that is provided in this table.
Bachtcta, value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A4.3.3 of Appendix A-3).
-
BAFs were used for compounds with a log Km value above 4.0, as cited in U.S. EPA
(1995b). BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying a food chain
multiplier (FCM) with an estimated BCF. BCFs were estimated using the
correlation equation obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980).
FCMs were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc) — See Appendix A-3.
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
1.59E-04
5.02E-04
6.08E-04
1.59E-01
3.97E-04
NA
1.63E+03
NA
Health Benchmarks
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Ora/CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
/yC(mg/m3)
InMatton URF
Gug/m3)'1
InJudation CSF
^/kg/day)'1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
3.0E-02
ND
1.1E-01
ND
ND
Note:
NA-Not applicable
ND " No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-618
-------
TABLE A-3-183
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR TETRAHYDROFURAN (109-99-9)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation . ' 1 Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MT(g/mole)
Tm(K)
Pp(atm)
5(mg/L)
/f(atm-m3/mol)
A,(cmVs)
Z)w(cm2/s)
KW (unitless)
^c(mL/g)
K4(cm3/g)
/saUL/Kg)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Vp value cited in Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckleman (1989).
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994g).
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for phthalates
and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and fiirans,
cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). Kol. value was calculated by using the recommended K^
value that is provided hi this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with ,8^. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon hi soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon hi soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koq that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon hi suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon hi suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
-
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
. -
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4;B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
72.1
164.6
2.14E-01
at25°C
(liquid)
ND
ND
1.31E-01
1.07E-05
2.80E+00
3.16E+00
3.16E-02
2.37E-01
A-3-619
-------
TABLE A-3-183
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR TETRAHYDROFURAN (109-99-9)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
:-:-!-.Value"-;
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
«4,(cm/g>
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Kdfy value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kfc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the KK value that is provided in this table.
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard
(1989-1993).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited hi Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in the table.
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
1.26E-01
4.43E+01
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, ng/g DW plant ,
^g/mL soil water"
,(*glg DW plant v
Uglg soil
* Hg/g DW plant v
pglg soil
^ttglgDW plant )
Uglg soil
.(tgfg DW plant*
pg/g air
^ttglg DW plant j
Uglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km, that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent
ifrVoo value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table.
Br^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Kmv value that
is provided in this table.
Br&ca& va'ue was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
jSrw value that is provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
6.82E+00
2.16E+02
2.14E-HH
2.14E+01
ND
ND
A-3-620
-------
TABLE A-3-183
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR TETRAHYDROFURAN (109-99-9)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation ' ''
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamilt (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
5^ (day/kg FW)
Baegg (day/kg FW)
5
-------
TABLE A-3-184
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR THALLIUM (7440-28^0)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
: Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/roole)
rmCK)
F/>(atm)
S(mg/L)
//(atm-mVmol)
£>.(cmVs)
A,(cmVs)
A^, (unitless)
J^(tal/g)
A'4(mL/g)
J&kO/Kg)
A^ (mL/g)
fe£ (year)'1
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
All metals, except mercury, are assumed to be nonvolatile at ambient
temperatures.
All metals, except mercury, are assumed to be insoluble in water.
H value is assumed to be zero, because the Vp and S values are zero for all
metals, except mercury.
De value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Dw value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
-
-
Kd. value was obtained from U.S. EPA (1996a), which provides pH-based
values that were estimated by using the MINTEQ2 geochemical speciation
model.
KdM value is assumed to be same as the Kd, value, because organic carbon does
not playa major role in sOrption for the metals, as cited in U.S. EPA (1994f).
Kdfa value is assumed to be same as the Kds value, because organic carbon does
not play a major role in sorption for the metals, as cited in U.S. EPA (1994f).
-
-
~
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18;
B-4-24
B-4-16;
B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
204.38
576.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.48E-02
6.34E-06
NA
NA
44atpH=4.9;
71atpH=6.8;
96 at pH=8.0
44atpH=4.9;
71atpH=6.8;
96 at pH=8.0
44atpH=4.9;
71atpH=6.8;
96atpH=8.0
MD
A-3-622
-------
TABLE A-3-184
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR THALLIUM (7440-28-0)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Because they are nonvolatile, metals are assumed to be 100 percent in
particulate phase and zero percent in the vapor phase, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994f).
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
0.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, pg/g DW plant .
" uglmL soil water'
.tiglg DW plant.
pglg soil
,/ig/g DW plant.
/^g/g soil
Brfarage
,t^.glg DW plant.
pg/g soil
,/j.g/g DW plant.
pg/g soil
^glg DW plant ^
pg/g air
,yg/g DW plant.
/J.g/g air
Brmotveg value was obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984). Br
values for nonvegetative growth (such as tubers) in Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and
Shor (1984) were used for Brrootveg.
Brag value for fruits was obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984).
Br values for nonvegetative growth (reproductive) in Baes,, Sharp, Sjoreen, and
Shor (1984) were used for Br^ (fruits). Br^ value for vegetables was calculated
using data obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984). Br values for
nonvegetative (reproductive) growth and Bv values for vegetative growth
weighted as 75% (reproductive) and 25% vegetative (Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and
Shor [1 984])— were used for Br^ (vegetables).
The weighted average Brag value for aboveground produce was obtained as
follows: (1) Bra, values for fruits combined with a human consumption rate of
fruits of 1.44E-03 kg/kg/day, and (2) Bra, values for vegetables combined with a
human consumption rate or vegetables of 1.49E-03 kg/kg/day.
Brforage value was obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984). Bv
values for vegetative growth (such as leaves and stems) in Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen,
and Shor (1984) were used for Brfarage.
Br ta value was obtained from Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and Shor (1984). Br
values for nonvegetative growth as recommended by Baes, Sharp, Sjoreen, and
Shor (1984) were used for Br^.
Metals are assumed to not experience air-to-leaf transfer, as cited in
U.S.EPA(1995b).
Metals are assumed to not experience air-to-leaf transfer, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b).
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-8
B-3-8
B-2-8
B-3-8
ND
4.00E-04
8.58E-04
4.00E-03
4.00E-04
NA
NA
A-3-623
-------
TABLE A-3-184
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR THALLIUM (7440-28-0)
(Page 3 of 3)
Pfllr JJlH'CtCTT
Reference and Explanation , i
Equations
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba~»(teyfogFW)
2te^(day/kg FW)
J&V* (day/kg FW)
£flw (day/kg FW)
£
-------
TABLE A-3-I85
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR TOLUENE (108-88-3)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations •
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MT(g/mole)
r*(K)
Vp (atm)
S(mg/L)
/T(atm-m3/mol)
0. (cm2/s)
A,(cm2/s)
Km (unitless)
*oc(mL/g)
J&C(ons/g)
^(L/Kg)
A«4.(cmJ/g)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckehnan (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckehnan (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dv value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kds value was calculated by using the correlation equation with-K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
jKsL, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 m suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^. value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kdte value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
-
-
~
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
92.13
178.1
3.71E-02
at25°C
(liquid)
5.58E402
6.13E-03
9.72E-02
9.23E-06
4.65E+02
1.40E+02
1.40E+00
1.05E+01
5.60E+00
A-3-625
-------
TABLE A-3-185
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR TOLUENE (108-88-3)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
„<«•
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991) and Mackay, Shiu, and Ma
(1992).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-2-7; B-2-8!
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Value
1.15E+01
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, uglg DW plant ,
'(tgtmL soil water
tUglg DW plant \
Hgfg soil
fftgfg DW plant*
(tg/g soil
^iglg DW plant ^
(iglg soil
(lig/g DW plant*
Uglg air
t M&4> DW plant ..
pglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the AL, value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent
Srr«nvc* value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in trustable.
fir.- value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Br£sege value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM, value that is provided in this table.
BVa, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and !£„, values that are provided in this table.
Bvjorfgf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
' Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
3.26E+01
2.33E+01
1.11E+00
1.11E+00
6.33E-03
6.33E-03
A-3-626
-------
TABLE A-3-185
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR TOLUENE (108-88-3)
(Page 3 of 3)
'^Parameter '
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamm (day/kg FW)
Ba^day/kgFW)
Bapork (day/kg FW)
Baeggs (day/kg FW)
^a^to, (day/kg FW)
*CFj»
(L/kgFW tissue)
5^,, (L/kgFW)
BSAFfcH (unitless)
.R/D (mg/kg/day)
Oa/ CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
fl/C (mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-'
Inhalation CSF
fms/kfi/dav)
fiam/tt value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^gf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba ',„* value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Ba value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
BacUcken value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation with Km
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
—
—
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Health Benchmarks
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-. ' .
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
Value
3.69E-06
1.17E-05
1.41E-05
3.69E-03
9.22E-06
6.27E+01
NA
NA
2.0E-01
ND
4.0E-01
ND
ND
Note:
NA= Not applicable
ND= No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-627
-------
TABLE A-3-186
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR O-TOLUIDINE (95-53-4)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
MT(g/mole)
Tm(K)
Fp(atm)
5(mg/L)
/f(atnvmVmol)
4,(cmVs)
Dw(cmVs)
A^ (unitless)
^(mL/g)
/T4(cmVg)
A'dU(L/Kg)
A'«4,(cm3/g)
Reference and Explanation : • ^
Equations
;•'' Value "•'
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neill, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
5 value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
£f value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
De value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
£>„ value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995).
KK value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). Kx value was calculated by using the recommended K^ value
that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kof that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in
this table.
Kd,,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koq that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the Km value that is provided in this table.
Kdf* value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kdbt, because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by using the
KB. value that is provided in this table.
~
--
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
—
—
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
107.15
258.4
3.94E-04
at25°C
(liquid)
1.74E-H)4
2.43E-06
7.14E-02
9.12E-06
2.19E+01
1.57E+01
1.57E-01
1.18E+00
6.28E-01
A-3-628
-------
TABLE A-3-186
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR O-TOLUIDINE (95-53-4)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-l;B-2-l;
B-2-7; B-2-8;. '
B-3-l;B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
3.61E+01
0.999998
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, t^g/g DW plant -
" fJ.g/mL soil water'
Brroaveg
^glgDW plant ^
IJ-glg soil
Brag
,Hglg DW plant ,
pg/g soil
Bfforage
^glgDW plant ^
Uglg soil
Bvag
,Hglg DW plant^
\ i . )
pg/g air
BVforage
^glgDWplant^
pg/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Brraa, value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table.
Bra, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided hi this table.
Brbiage value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited hi Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided hi this
table.
BV foram value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and /fthat is
cited m Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the #and Km values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
8.81E+00
5.61E+01
6.51E+00
6.51E+00
6.16E-01
6.16E-01
A-3-629
-------
TABLE A-3-186
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR O-TOLUIDINE (95-53-4)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations,
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^n (day/kg FW)
Ba^f (day/kg FW)
Ba^i (day/kg FW)
&W (day/kg FW)
aUteUnCdaykgFW)
-SC/w
(L/kg7FW tissue)
A4F^ (L/kg FW)
BSAFftH (unitless)
jBo^t value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^f value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^f. value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Batetf value.
•Btffjp value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
B<*Mdtm value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba,^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value below 4.0, as cited hi
U.S. EPA (1995b). -BCFf,h value calculated using the correlation equation with/T^
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
-
- .--...
Health Benchmarks
RjD (mg/kg/day)
Ofl/GSF
(mg/kg/day)-'
J5/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
fcgto')-'
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
-
U.S.EPA(1995b)
-
Calculated from Oral CSF" using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
Value beased on Oral CSF assuming route-to-route extrapolation.
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
1.74E-07
5.50E-07
6.65E-07
1.74E-04
4.34E-07
6.14E+00
NA
NA
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
NA
2.4E-01
NA
6.9E-02
2.4E-01
Note:
NA-Not applicable
ND- No data available
AH parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-630
-------
TABLE A-3-187
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE (87-61-6)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties
Mf(g/mole)
Tm(£)
Vp(atin)
S(mg/L)
H (aim-no? /mol)
A,(cm2/s)
A,(cm2/s)
Km (unitless)
^(mL/g)
Kds(cm3/g)
Kd^CLfKg)
Kdts(cm3/g)
.Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value calculated from values cited in Mackay, Shiu, and Ma
(1991).
Geometric mean value calculated from values cited in Mackay, Shiu, and Ma
(1991).
/Tvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl^
and Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was
calculated by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Z>w value was obtained from CHEMDAf 8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995).
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation, with Km for
phthalates and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs,
dioxhis, and furans, cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). Koc value was calculated by
using the recommended K^ value that is provided in this table.
Kds value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
iriU.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil.
Measured organic carbon hi soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to
calculate Kds, because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic
carbon in soil. Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Koc value
that is provided in this table;
KdL,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation -with K that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 hi
suspended sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific
to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies,
depending on the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment.
Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided
in this table.
Kdbs value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^ that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending
on the fraction of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4^.21
B-4-20
-
B-l-3;B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3;B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-3-3; B-3-4;
B-3-5; B-3-6;
B-4-3; B4-4;
B-4-5; B-4-6;
B-4-10;B-4-ll
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
Value
181.46
325.7
3.20E-04
af25°C
(solid)
2.05E+01
2.84E-03
3.02E-02
8.15E-06
.1.11E+04..
2.02E+04
2.02E+02
1.52E+03
8.10E+02
A-3-631
-------
TABLE A-3-187
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE (87-61-6)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation '-•;
'"'''•EquiatibBsi;'«;
J'"'^alUe:-~:'
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
lag (year}1
Fv (unitless)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in
Mackay, Shiu, and Ma (1992).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value ofFv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-1; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
1.41E+00
0.999999
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, ftg/g DW plant v
* UglmL soil water'
EfntlYts
.Uglg DW plant \
(jtglg soil '
*W
>ttg/g DWplant^
fgfg soil
**W
.pglg DW plant.
Hg/g soil
*w
*l*gtg DWplant^
Uglg air
*»W
^g/g DW plant j
pg/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited
in Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight
basis by using a moisture content of 87 percent.
Bfnoivfg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value
provided in this table.
Br., value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for '
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the Kn, value that is provided in this table.
.ffirjfc™ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
Bv^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K and .//that
is cited in Bacci, Calamari, Qaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira,
Gaggi, Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a
factor of 100. No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce
and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C,
by using the Hand K^, values that are provided in this table.
Bvjow va*ue was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H
that is cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira,
Gaggi, Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a
factor of 100. No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce
and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C,
by using the Hand Km values that are provided in this table.
"
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
3.09E+02
1.53E400
1.78E-01
1.78E-01
4.01E-01
4.01E-01
A-3-632
-------
TABLE A-3-187
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE (87-61-6)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
' Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
BamM (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Bflfc* (day/kg FW)
£aeaf (day/kg FW)
BaMcten (day/kg FW)
BCF^
(L/kg FW tissue)
B^F^(L/kgFW)
BSAFfcb (unitiess)
JSam/ft value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
Bateef value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ri, value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^^- value.
Ba value was calculated by using the correlation equation withj&T that is
citea in California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using
the K^ value that is provided in this table.
Bachldxn value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef
(15/19) and multiplying it with the Babe^- value. .
- . . • ....-....••
BAFs were used for compounds with a log Kw value above 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying
a food chain multiplier (FCM) with an estimated BCF. BCFs were estimated
using the correlation equation obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and
Caroll (1980). FCMs were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc) — See Appendix
A-3.
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
8.82E-05
2.79E-04
3.38E-04
8.82E-02
2.20E-04
NA
8.76E+02
NA
, . Health Benchmarks
RJD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF (mg/kg/day)"1
RfC(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF (^g/m3)'1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
- '
- "
.
~
- •
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-633
-------
TABLE A-3-188
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE (120-82-1)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation ,
Equations
::'.'"' Valtte\ ,.';•
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/moIe)
rm(K)
J£(atm)
S(mg/L)
//(atnvm'/mol)
D,(cmVs)
jDw(cmV«)
A'w(uniUess)
A'w(raL/g)
A'
-------
TABLE A-3-188
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE (120-82-1)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991) and Mackay, Shiu, and Ma
(1992).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in lunge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
Equations
Value
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
1.41E+00
0.999999
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
• tJ-8/S DW plant .
^ UglmL soil voter
D
£>rrool veg
,/J-g/g DW plant.
Vg/g soil
(Mg/g DW plant ^
f^g/g soil
,/j.g/g DW plant.
IJ-glg soil
(Mg/g DW plant ^
fj.g/g air
,/tgfg DW plant.
fj-glg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Ar^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroo, value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
hi this table.
Br -.value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
B> 'teas* value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM, value that is provided in this table.
Bv „ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and ffthat is
cited hi Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided hi this table.
Bvf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KW values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
2.80E+02
1.69E+01
1.92E-01
1.92E-01
3.78E-01
3.78E-01
A-3-635
-------
TABLE A-3-188
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE (120-82-1)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Biotransfer Factors for Animals (Continued)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^Cday&gFW)
Ba^, (day/kg FW)
>&»««*« (day/kg FW)
.BC/^L
(L/kgFW tissue)
fl.4F/A(L/kgFW)
•B&AF^k (unitless)
•#a»i/»i value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Bai«f value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Bap^ value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Ba^g value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
Baa,idm value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value. •
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCFf,h value calculated using the correlation equation with Km
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
-
_
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Value
7.73E-05
2.45E-04
2.96E-04
7.73E-02
1.93E-04
6.33E+02
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
/5/D (mg/kg/day)
Ora/CSF
(mg/kg/day)-'
/5/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
Ou&to3)-'
Inhalation CSF
^mg/kg/day)-1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
U.S. EPA (1997c)
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
l.OE-02
ND
2.0E-01
ND
ND
Note:
NA-Not applicable
ND« No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-636
-------
TABLE A-3-189
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE (71-55-6)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation °
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties
AW(g/mole)
r»(K)
Vp(atta)
S(mg/L)
^(atm-m'/mol)
A,(cm2/s)
Dw(cm2/s)
KW (unitless)
^(«L/g)
A%(cnrVg)
*4,(L/Kg)
Kdte (cmVg)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl,
and Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was
calculated by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
£>„ value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
£>„ value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1996b)
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil.
Measured organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to
calculate Kds, because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic
carbon in soil. Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the K^. value
that is provided in this table.
Kd^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in
suspended sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific
to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies,
depending on the fraction of organic carbon hi suspended sediment.
Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided
in this table.
Kdbs value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^. that is cited
in U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending
on the fraction of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in
Howard, Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977).
Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided
in the table.
v
-
—
- .
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-3-3; B-3-4;
B-3-5; B-3-6;
B-4-3; B-4-4;
B-4-5; B-4-6;
B-4-10;B-4-ll
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-1; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
Value
133.42
242.7
1.63E-01
at25°C
(liquid)
1.17E+03
1.86E-02
2.64E+02
9.56E-06
2.64E+02
1.35E+02
1.35E+00
1.01E+01
5.40E+00
9.27E-01
1.000000
A-3-637
-------
TABLE A-3-189
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE (71-55-6)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, Hgfg DW plant .
* pgfmL soil water''
B*"r*»f*1t
^glg DW plant.
Uglg soil
Br«
,ftg/g DW plant.
ttg/g soil
*W
^fjtgig DWplant^
t*8/g soil
Bv«
^g/g DW plant.
USte air
B>W
^glgDW plant.
t*g/g air '
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited
in Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight
basis by using a moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroolvfg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value
provided in this table.
jSr.. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the Km value that is provided in this table.
Brjj^f value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
cifedm Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using
the KM value that is provided in this table.
Bvaf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K and H that
is cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira,
Gaggi, Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a
factor of 100. No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce
and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C,
by using the Hand K^ values that are provided in this table.
BVforti* value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H
that is cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira,
Gaggi, Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a
factor of 100. No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce
and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C,
by using the H and K^ values that are provided in this table.
Equations ;
Value
"
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
2.33E-HH
1.73E+01
1.54E+00
1.54E+00
1.14E-03
1.14-03
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
£a*ja (day/kg FW)
flow (day/kg FW)
Ba^t (day/kg FW)
&V (day/kg FW)
£o.*fci», (day/kg FW)
Ifajrityalue was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using
the K^ value that is provided in this table.
Bottf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
cited in Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using
the K^ value that is provided in this table.
Ba • t value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
ana multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Ba value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is
cited in California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using
the Kn, value that is provided in this table.
Baa^tm value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef
(15/19) and multiplying it with the Ba^^ value:
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
2.10E-06
6.63E-06
8.03E-06
2.10E-03
5.24E-06
A-3-638
-------
TABLE A-3-189
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE (71-55-6)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
BCF^
(L/kg FW tissue)
A^OAgFW)
BSAFfrk (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation with
Km obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix
A-3.
-
-
Equations
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28 ,
Health Benchmarks
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF (mg/kg/day)-1
Jf/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF Qj.g/m3)'1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
U.S. EPA (1997a) t
.
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
Value
4.08E+01
NA
NA
3.50E-02
NA
1.23E-01
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-639
-------
TABLE A-3-190
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE (79-00-5)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation •: :
Equations
'-- "'-Value'",-
Chemical/Physical Properties
MK(g/mole)
7"W(K)
Fp(atm)
S(mg/L)
^(atm-m'/mol)
Z>.(cmVs)
£>w(cm5/s)
/^(unitless)
^(mL/g)
*rf,(cmVg)
Jfik(l/Kg)
J&4, (cmVg)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
/if value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MfP, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Devalue was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited hi U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kof that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kda
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon hi soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd^, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value was
calculated by using the Kx value that is provided in this table.
Kdjp value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kd^,, because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by using the
I^ value that is provided in this table.
~
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18;
B-4-24
B-4-16;
B-4-25
133.42
238.1
3.31E-02
at 25°C
(liquid)
4.40E+03
l.OOE-03
4.51E-02
l.OE-05
1.25E+02
7.50E+01
7.50E-01
5.63E+00
3.00E+00
A-3-640
-------
TABLE A-3-190
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE (79-00-5)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter *
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (year)"1
Fv (unitless)
Ksgvahie was calculated by using the chemical half-life hi soil, as cited hi Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited hi Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8;B-4-l;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Value
6.93E-01
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, pg/g DW plant .
" fj-glmL soil -water'
"^rool veg
fizgig DW 'plant \
fj.g/g soil
ffj-g/g DW plant-.
fj.g/g soil
ffj-g/g DW plant -.
/ig/g soil
,ftg/g DW plant ,
pg/g air
^glg DW plant )
fj-g/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited hi
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroo. value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
hi this table (see section A3.4.2 of Appendix A-3).
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
Br&rage value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
hi Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with 'K^ and H that is
cited hi Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor oflOO,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values for,
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and K^ values that are provided hi this
table.
Bvfo value was calculated by using the correlation equation with ^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vigni (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and K^ values that are provided hi this
table. •
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.59E+01
2.12E+01
2.38E+00
2.38E+00
9.53E-03
9.53E-03
A-3-641
-------
TABLE A-3-190
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE (79-00-5)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Sa^n (day/kg FW)
Bett^f (day/kg FW)
j&k* (day/kg FW)
Bam (day/kg FW)
£a«*fci*, (day/kg FW)
-BCFji,,
(LftgFW tissue)
AUfcOAgFVO
jBfi^M (unltless)
5am«j value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^, value
that is provided in this table.
BaiMf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with AT^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
BOfaf value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A3 .4.2 of Appendix A-3).
Ba.g- value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
SaMctm value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A3.4.3 of Appendix A-3).
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCFM value calculated using the correlation equation with Km
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
9.93E-07
3.14E-06
3.80E-06
9.93E-04
2.48E-06
2.31E+01
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
R/D (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
/?/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
t^g/rn3)-'
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997b)
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997c)
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
4.0E-03
5.70E-02
1.4E-02
1.6E-05
5.7E-02
Note:
NA • Not applicable
ND » No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-642
-------
TABLE A-3-191
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR TRICHLOROETHYLENE (79-01-6)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
rm(K)
Vp(a.tm)
S(mg/L)
H(atnvm3/mol)
A,(cm2/s)
Dw(cm2/s)
X^ (unitless)
^c(mL/g)
/MXcmVg)
Jsa^ovKg)
MXcmVg)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1 994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). Koc value was calculated by using the recommended Km value
that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with KO! that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kda
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Kx value that is provided in
this table.
Kd^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koq that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^, value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kdfy value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kd^ value was calculated by using the
Koc value that is provided in this table.
-
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
131.40
188.3
9.48E-02
at25°C
(liquid)
1.18E+03
1.06E-02
4.65E-02
9.94E-06
2.71E+02
9.40E+01
9.40E-01
7.05E+00
3.76E+00
A-3-643
-------
TABLE A-3-191
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR TRICHLOROETHYLENE (79-01-6)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation :
'•'"•'l^Batioiiur--'-'--
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
fog (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Ksgvahie was calculated by using; the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
• 'Value
0.703
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, ngig DW plant .
'(ig/mL soil water
^""nMng
^Uglg DW plant ^
t*glg soil
AW
^ftgtg DW plant j
pg/g soil
Br^
,Hglg DW plant.
ftg/g soil
B*«
.Uglg DW plant.
t*S/g air
5»W
^g/g DWplant^
Uglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the AL, value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
•B^w* value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table (see section A3.4.2 of Appendix A-3).
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Br&px' v^"6 Vfas calculated by using the correlation equation withX^ that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM, value that is provided in this table.
Sv^value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vigffi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor oflOO,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided hi this
table.
Svfrf& value Vfas calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
citedin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
2.37E+01
2.12E+01
1.52E+00
1.52E+00
2.07E-03
2.07E-03
A-3-644
-------
TABLE A-3-191
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR TRICHLOROETHYLENE (79-01-6)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Bamilk (day/kg FW)
Ba^ef (day/kg FW)
&V, (day/kg FW)
5aeffi (day/kg FW)
A4**. (day/kg FW)
5CF«rt
(L/kg, FW tissue)
AiF^L/kgFW)
BSAFfi,,, (unitless)
" Reference and Explanation
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamm.va\ue was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ef value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba • k value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba,^ value (see section A3 .4.2 of Appendix A-3).
Baess, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
Bachlckm value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Babelf value (see section A3 .4.3 of Appendix A-3).
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCFs,h value calculated using the correlation equation withX^,
obtained from Veith. Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980)— See Appendix A-3.
- -
—
Equations
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
Health Benchmarks
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Ora/ CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
^/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/ks/dayV1
U.S.EPA (1997a)
U.S. EPA (1995b)
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
U.S. EPA (1995b)
Value based on Oral CSF assuming route-to-route extrapolation.
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
Value
2.15E-06
6.81E-06
8.24E-06
2.15E-03
5.37E-06
4.16E+01
NA
NA
6.0E-03
1.1E-02
2.1E-02
1.7E-06
1.1E-02
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-645
-------
TABLE A-3-192
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (75-69-4)
(Page! of3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/moIe)
Tm(K)
FHatm)
S(tng/L)
/f(atnvmVmoI)
Z>.(cmVs)
A,(cmVs)
KI* (unitless)
*«
-------
TABLE A-3-192
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (75-69-4)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ksg (yearT1
Fv (unitless)
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life hi soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenkb (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
B-l-2;B-2-2;
B-3-2;B-4-2
B-l-1; B^2-l;
B-2-7; Br2-8;
B-3-l;B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
Value
7.03E-01
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, pglg DW plant .
" /j.g/mL soil water'
^glg DW plant )
IJ-glg soil
^glg DW plant )
V-glg soil
,fj.g/g DW plant -.
IJ-glg soil
,Hglg DW plant-.
/j.g/g air
(IJ-glg DW plant \
I4glgair
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the .K^ value that is
provided in this table.' The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroo,veg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table (see section A3.4.2 of Appendix A-3).
Br value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^, value that
is provided in this table. ,
.Br, -„ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with-K^, that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
Bv value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited hi Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and VigM (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and K^, values that are provided in this
table. ••'•••
Bvfor e value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and /fthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
.B-3-9
6^2-8
B-3-8
2.70E+01
2.02E+00
1.33E+00
1.33E+00
2.02E-04
2.02E-Q4
A-3-647
-------
TABLE A-3-192
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE (75-69-4)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations^
-' "Value ";^
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Ba^n (day/kg FW)
£fl|^(day/kgFW)
&W (day/kg FW)
-Bo^ (day/kg FW)
•&Wi*, (day/kg FW)
ae^
(L/kg, FW tissue)
A4FM(L/kgFW)
BSAFju, (unitless)
tyD (mg/kg/day)
Oo/CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
RJC (mg/mj)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m1)-'
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)"1
JJfl,^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Bau<( value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using thethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A3.4.2 of Appendix A-3).
Ba.— value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Cafifoniia EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
BaMtm value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value (see section A3.4.3 of Appendix A-3).
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^h value calculated using the correlation equation with A^,
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
-
-
Health Benchmarks
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
U.S. EPA (1997c)
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
2.70E-06
8.54E-06
1.03E-05
2.70E-03
6.74E-06
4.94E+01
NA
NA
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
3.0E-01
ND
7.0E-01
ND
ND
Note:
NA-Not applicable
ND •• No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-648
-------
TABLE A-3-193
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL (95-95-4)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation '
; Equations'
Value >
Chemical/Physical Properties
AffT(g/mole)
Tm(K)
Vp (atm)
5(mg/L)
jff(atm-m3/mol)
A,(cm2/s)
Av(cm2/s)
Km (unitless)
K.c(mL/g)
J&4 (cmVg)
AWOT(L/Kg)
Budavari, O'Neill, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neill, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). .
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
H value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
For all ionizing organics, Kac values were estimated on the basis of pH. Estimated
values were obtained from U.S. EPA (1994c).
Kd. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in
this table for a pH of 7.0.
Kd-y, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^,c that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the Kac value that is provided in this table for a pH of 7.0.
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18;B-4-24
197.46
340.1
2.15E-05
at25°C
(solid)
7.53E+02
5.64E-06
2.91E-02
7.03E-06
7.41E+03
TT y
ptl A^
1 2,380
2 2,380
3 2,380
4 2,377
5 2,353
6 2,139
7 1,127
8 223.7
9 56.14
10 37.94
11 36.10
12 35.92
13 35.90
14 35.90
.1.13E+01
8.45E+01
A-3-649
-------
TABLE A-3-193
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL (95-95-4)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation ;•
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
JB/k (cm'/g)
lag (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Kd,a value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom secQment. Recommended Kdb! value was calculated by using the
Kx value that is provided in this table for a pH of 7.0.
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using S, Tm, and Vp values
mat are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
Equations
Value
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
4.51E+01
0.367
0.999989
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, (igtg DW plant ,
*pg/mL soil water'
.yg/g DW plant.
t*g!g soil
(Hg/g DW plant.
Uglg soil
(ftg/g DW plant.
Hg/g soil
.ygfg DWplant^
Mg/g air
,t*g/g DW plant.
Uglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with-K^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
5r™(ve? value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table.
Br^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^, value that
is provided in this table.
Brjfeag, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and £f that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d\ No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided in this
table.
Bvfr-gc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and /fthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, andVighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
2.28E+02
2.02E+01
2.24E-01
2.24E-01
1.31E+02
1.31E+02
A-3-650
-------
TABLE A-3-193
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL (95-95-4)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation - - -
Equations
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamm (day/kg FW)
5a4e^(day/kgFW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Batsg (day/kg FW)
SacWcfan (day/kg FW)
£CF^
(L/kg FW tissue)
^^(L/kgFW)
BSAFfch (unitless)
BamlK value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ef value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
.Ba value was calculated by using the correlation equation vnHa.K^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by. using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
Bachid
-------
TABLE A-3-194
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL (88-06-2)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation | Equations ;
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MPCg/moIe)
7*m(K)
Jfr(atm)
5(mg/L)
#(atovmVmol)
£>«(cmVs)
Z)w(cm%)
A**, (unitless)
A'K(mL/g)
A'aUcmVg)
A^(L/Kg)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
/fvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
£>„ value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
For all ionizing organics, K., values were estimated on the basis of pH. Estimated
values were obtained from U.S. EPA (1994c).
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd. value was calculated by using the KL. value that is provided in
this table for a pH of 7.0.
Kdg, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the Kac value that is provided in this table for a pH of 7.0.
-
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
197.46
342.1
1.55E-05
at25°C
(solid)
7.53E+02
4.06E-06
2.62E-02
8.08E-06
5.15E+03
_TT V
Eti &OC
1 1,070
2 1,070
3 1,069
4 1,063
5 1,006
6 670.8
7 226.2
8 120.4
9 108.4
10 107.1
11 107.0
12 107.0
13 107.0
14 107.0
2.26E+00
1.70E+01
A-3-652
-------
TABLE A-3-194
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL (88-06-2)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation "" '
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
«4(cm/g)
ksg (year)"1
Fv (unitless)
Kd^, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with-K^. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdts value was calculated by using the
Koc value that is provided in this table for a pH of 7.0.
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using 5, Tm, and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-1; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
9.05E+00
3.61E+00
0.999986
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
' l^-glg DW plant -
" uglmL soil water'
,/tg/g DW plant.
fj-g/g soil
,/j.glg DW plant.
Uglg soil
fizgig DW plant \
fj,g/g soil
,yg/g DW plant.
Uglg air
,/j,g/g DW plant,
pglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Brroolm value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table.
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Br&rage value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM, value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and VigM (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and K^ values that are provided in this
table.
Bvforfgf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and //that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the Hand K^ values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.74E+02
7.69E+01
2.77E-01
2.77E-01
1.23E+02
1.23E+02
A-3-653
-------
TABLE A-3-194
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL (88-06-2)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Ba~m (day/kg FW)
Bdi«f (day/kg FW)
£<»,„* (day/kg FW)
Bow (day/kg FW)
&W«, (day&gFW)
JBCF^
(L&gTFW tissue)
B^jiO-AgFW)
BSAFju, (unitless)
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
£flmffit value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Baixf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
jBa~,t value was calculated by using thethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
anamultiplying it with the Ba^ value.
5a__ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Canromia EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
fia-teta, value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log Km value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^,, value calculated using the correlation equation with K^
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
—
—
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
4.09E-05
1.29E-04
1.57E-04
4.09E-02
1.02E-04
3.90E+02
NA
NA.
Health Benchmarks
/5/D (mg/kg/day)
Ora/tSF
(nig/kg/day)-1
/^(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
frSfaY
Inhalation CSF
fmgVkg/day)4
-
U.S. EPA (1995b)
-
U.S. EPA (1997)
- ' i • -..
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
-
1.1E-02
~
3.1E-06
-
Note:
NA » Not applicable
ND « No data available
AH parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-654
-------
TABLE A-3-195
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE (96-18-4)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter • •
Reference and Explanation ' ' ' '
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MT(g/mole)
r»(K)
Vp(atia)
S(mg/L)
/T(atm-m3/mol)
A,(cm2/s)
Z>w(cm2/s)
^(unitless)
^(mL/g)
JCaKcnrYg)
toUL/Kg)
AiUcmVg)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
//value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995).
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). Koc value was calculated by using the recommended K^ value
that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with ATof that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon hi soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd,,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the K^. value that is provided in
this table.
Kd-, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with AT0? that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kd,,s value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by using the
Koc value that is provided hi this table.
,
-
-
•
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
—
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
147.43
258.4
4.90E-03
at 25°C
(liquid)
1.90E+03
3.80E-04
3.99E-02
9.24E-06
1.78E+02
8.05E+01
8.10E-01
6.04E+00
3.22E+00
A-3-655
-------
TABLE A-3-195
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE (96-18-4)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation : ;
Equations
:v"' Value' vV
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
hg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
7.03E-01
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, Vglg DW plant .
' uglmL soil water'
fl»Ww*
^figlg DWplant^
(tglg soil
*W
(tigfg DW plant.
V uglg soil
Brt~»
^Vg/g DW plant j
ttg/g soil
*>«
^gigDW plant ^
Uglg air
*»W
^Vg/gDWplant^
Hg/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982V Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in tnis table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Br^vc, value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in this table.
Br^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Brfaagt value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
K^, value that is provided in this table.
Bv^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 1QO,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the Hand K^ values that are provided in this
table.
Bvf»t& value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, andVighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and K^ values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.89E+01
2.34E+01
1.94E+00
1.94E-KX)
3.66E-02
3.66E-02
A-3-656
-------
TABLE A-3-195
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE (96-18-4)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation " ' ,
Equations ' -
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamilk (day/kg FW)
Saw (day/kg FW
Baport (day/kg FW
Batgg (day/kg FW)
-Ba^teto, (day/kg FW)
BCF^
(L/kg FW tissue)
Atf^CL/kgFW
BSAFfrh (unitless)
Bamllk value was calculated by using the correlation equation with KM that is cited in
Travis and Anns (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ef value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^rt value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Baes- value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^, value
that is provided m this table.
Bachickm value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba,^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation with Km
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
- • "
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
1.41E-06
4.47E-06
5.41E-06
1.41E-03
3.53E-06
3.02E+01
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RJD (mg/kg/day)
OralCSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
fl/C (mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
U.S. EPA (1997c)
Calculated from RJD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
Calculated from Oral CSF using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg. ,
Value based on Oral CSF assuming route-to-route extrapolation.
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
6.0E-03
7.0E400
2.1E-02
2.0E-03
7.0E+00
Note:
NA= Not applicable
ND= No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-657
-------
TABLE A-3-196
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE (108-67-8)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation -••.': -•- '.'• /• :
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
r«(K)
Fp(atm)
S(mg/L)
//(atnvmVmol)
£>.(cmVs)
Z>w(cmVs)
^(unitless)
A^OnL/g)
JfeKcmVg)
A'4*(L/Kg)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1992a).
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1992a).
lvalue was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the Mw,S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Rvalue cited in Howard (1989-1993).
Kx value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ for phthalates
and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans,
cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). Kx value was calculated by using the recommended K^
value that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with -SI. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kds,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd.y, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate KdM because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^, value
was calculated by using the KK value that is provided in this table.
-
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10;B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
120.19
287.9
1.30E-03
at25°C
(liquid)
2.00E+01
7.81E-03
6.48E-02
7.86E-06
2.63E+03
1.67E+03
1.67E+01
1.25E+02
A-3-658
-------
TABLE A-3-196
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE (108-67-8)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Kdbs (cmVg)
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Kdbs value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Koc value mat is provided in this table.
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Mackay,
Shiu,andMa(1992).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value ofFv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in the table.
Equations
Value
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
6.69E+01
3.16E+01
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, f^g/g DW plant .
' fj.g/mL soil water'
"r rooties
(//g/g DW plant )
Hg/g soil
^g/g DW plant ^
fj.g/g soil
Brforage
,/^g/g DW plant.
f^g/g soil
(
-------
TABLE A-3-196
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE (108-67-8)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
J&U, (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^k(d&yfkgFW)
flo^ (day/kg FW)
£0«tei« (day/kg FW)
BCF^w
(UkgFW dssue)
AtffcOL/kgFW)
BSAFjw, (unitless)
50^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
£
-------
TABLE A-3-197
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,3,5-TRINITROBENZENE (99-35-4)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
JWF(g/mole)
rm(K)
Vp(staa)
S(mg/L)
jST(atm-m3/mol)
A,(cm2/s)
£>w(cm2/s)
A^ (unitless)
Koc(wL/g)
Kds(cm3/g)
J5aL(IJKg)
&Ucm3/g)
Budavari, O'Neill, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neill, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1995b).
5 value cited in U.S. EPA (1 995b).
ff value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from WATERS model database (U.S. EPA 1995d).
Dw value was obtained from WATERS model database (U.S. EPA 1995d).
Arithmetic mean value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995).
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). Koc value was calculated by using the recommended K^ value
that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation vdthK0( that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kda
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Kac value that is provided in
this table.
Kd.,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kdbs value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kdts, because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by using the
Koc value that is provided in this table.
-
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
~~
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
213.11
395.6
1.30E-07
at25°C
(solid)
3.20E+02
8.66E-08
2.84E-02
6.08E-06
1.S1E+01
1.18E+01
1.18E-01
8.84E-01
4.72E-01
A-3-661
-------
TABLE A-3-197
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,3,5-TRINITROBENZENE (99-35-4)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
ktg (year)'1
Fv(unitless)
Ksg value was assumed to be 0 due to a lack of data.
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using S, Tm, and Vp values
that are provided in this table. Vp value for this compound was converted to a
liquid-phase value before being used in the calculations.
Equations
Value
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-l;B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
0.0
0.999504
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, tigls DW plant .
' ftg/mL soil water
Br^^.
^gfg DW plant.
l*Sls soil '
*W
/^g/jr DW plant*
ttgtg soil
%«*<
^g/gDW plant.
VStg soil '
*>«
.pglg DW plant.
pg/g air
StW
*ttgfg DW plant.
Hg/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
jB'Ww* value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in tnis table.
Br^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
Brjfe^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with AL, and Jfthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the Hand K^ values that are provided in this
table.
BVfrtif va^ue vtas calculated by using the correlation equation with A™ and H that is
cited inBacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the Hand K^ values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
8.19E+00
6.95E+01
8.05E400
8.05E+00
1.17E+01
1.17E-K)!
A-3-662
-------
TABLE A-3-197
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 1,3,5-TRINITROBENZENE (99-35-4)
(Page 3 of 3)
7-^arariieter
* , Reference and .Explanation
: Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamilt (day/kg FW)
Sa^f (day/kg FW)
AV* (day/kg FW)
Baeeg (day/kg FW)
&zcwcte, (day/kg FW)
5CF**
(L/kgFW tissue)
&4F^(L/kgFW)
BSAFfrk (unitless)
SamlVt value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and^Arms (1988), Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Babee( value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Bdpart value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba,^ value.
Bae^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
that is provided in this table.
BaMctol value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19,)
and multiplying it with the Ba,^ value. '.'" '
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). jBCF&A value calculated using the correlation equation with Km
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980)— See Appendix A-3.
' .' - ..
- . ''.'''
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27 !
B-4-28
1.20E-07
3.80E-07
4.60E-07
1.20E-04
3.00E-07
4.64E+00
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Ora/ CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
tf/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
0/g/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)-1
U.S. EPA (1997b)
- . . . . '
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
~ .
--.,.,. . , . . . .
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
3.0E-02
ND
1.1E-01
ND
ND
Note:
NA= Not applicable
ND= No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-663
-------
TABLE A-3-198
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2,4,6 -TRINITROTOLUENE (118-96-7)
(Pagel of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation '
"•^"BSquaHoBsK-'i
ft:^Valne' *-:••
Chemical/Physical Properties
MP(g/mole)
n,(K)
JHatro)
S(mg/L)
ff(atnvmVmoi)
D.(cmVs)
Dw(cmJ/s)
/^(unitless)
A'.c(mL/g)
/T4(cinVg)
tfkCUKg)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
-
-
H value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
De value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Devalue was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Recommended Km value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995).
KK value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, for phthalates
and PAHs, / all nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans,
cited in U.S. EPA (1994c). KK value was calculated by using the recommended Km
value that is provided in mis table.
Kd. value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Ka( that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kda
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd.,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with KOI. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
-
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
227.13
353.2
ND
ND
ND
2.62E-02
5.85E-06
3.98E+01
2.51E+01
2.51E-01
1.88E+00
A-3-664
-------
TABLE A-3-198
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2*4,6 -TRINITROTOLUENE (118-96-7)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
"~
ksg (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Kdfc value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA^,. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon m bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdts value was calculated by
using the Km value that is provided in this table.
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991)
Fv value was assumed to be 1.0 due to a lack of data.
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-l;B-3-2;
B-4-l;B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
l.OOE+00
1.41E+00
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, fj.glg DW plant .
* uglmL soil water'
,Hg/g DW plant.
pg/g soil
,/ug/g- DW plant.
Hg/g soil
forage
fj,g/g soil
,/tg/g DW plant.
pg/g air
(//g/g DW plant )
fj'g/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent. ,
BfrooMg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in mis table.
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^, value that
is provided in this table.
B' 'forage value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM, value that is provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
1.03E+01
4.10E+01
4.60E+00
4.60E+00
ND
ND
A-3-665
-------
TABLE A-3-198
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 2,4,6 -TRINITROTOLUENE (118-96-7)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
'Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
B*>«m (day/kg FW)
5ow(dty/kgFW)
Batvk (day/kg FW)
5aw (day/kg FW)
&teta (day/kg FW)
BCF&4
(L/kgFW tissue)
&<£/>* (Meg FW)
S&l^ (unitless)
fia^t value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
£
-------
TABLE A-3-199
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR VINYL ACETATE (108-05-4)
(Page 1 of 3)
" 'Earanieter
Reference and Explanation
Equations | Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MT(g/mole)
r»(K)
Vp(stia)
5(mg/L)
/T(atm-m3/mol)
A,(cm2/s)
£»w(cm2/s)
J^ (unitless)
^(mL/g)
*4(cm3/g)
*4,(L/Kg)
tf4(cm3/g)_
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994e).
.ff value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and .
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table. •
£>„ value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dv value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Koc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans, cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). Koc value was calculated by using the recommended Km value
that is provided in this table.
Kds value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculated/,,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table. ,
Kd^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K0^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kdja value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kac that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kd^, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
—
B-l-3;B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
86.09
180.1
1.43E-01
at25°C
(liquid)
2.24E+04
5.50E-04
9.94E-02
l.OOE-05
5.00E+00
4.97E+00
4.97E-02
3.73E-01
1.99E-01
A-3-667
-------
TABLE A-3-199
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR VINYL ACETATE (108-05-4)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
•'; ^Vatae/:-.' '
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
&£(year)''
Fv (unitless)
Ksg value was assumed to be 0 due to a lack of data.
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
B-l-l;B-2-l;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12;B-5-l
0.0
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, vg/g DW plant ,
' HgtmL soil ivater
Br^,^
ttigtg DW plant.
Vgtg soil
*Vr
.Uglg DW plant,
pgfg soil
Brf**s*
^tgfg DW plant ^
Hg/g soil
*W
,yglg DW plant.
fig/g air
AW
*Hglg DW plant.
fj.glg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation vnthKm that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km. value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Braves value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
in tmstable.
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with AT^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
Br&fagc value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km, that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988): No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM, value that is provided in this table.
Bv^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KB, values that are provided in this table.
Bvfiragf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
citedin Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); andBacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
7.11E+00
1.43E+02
1.53E+01
1.53E-H)!
.5.65E-04
5.65E-04
A-3-668
-------
TABLE A-3-199
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR VINYL ACETATE (108-05-4)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
• Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamilk (day/kg FW)
5ata^(day/kgFW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Baegg (day/kg FW)
£actefa!n (day/kg FW)
BCFju,
(L/kg FW tissue)
&4FJWk(L/kg.FW)
BSAFfrh (unitless)
Bamiai value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
BapaA value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Baeg, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
Bachlckm value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Bautf value. •
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^, value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^, value calculated using the correlation equation with/iT^,
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
_ , .
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
3.97E-08
1.26E-07
1.52E-07
3.97E-05
9.92E-08
2.00E+00
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
£/C(mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
G/g/m3)'1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
U.S. EPA (1997c)
;..'..
U.S. EPA (1997b)
.
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
l.OE+00
ND
2.0E-01
ND
ND
Note:
NA= Not applicable
ND= No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-669
-------
TABLE A-3-200
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR VINYL CHLORIDE (75-01-4)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and: Explanation
Equations
Value .•"'
Chemical/Physical Properties
A0P(g/mole)
Fm(K)
J>(atm)
S(mg/L)
//(atm-mVmol)
jD.(cms/s)
£>w(cmVs)
A'^ (unitless)
^(mL/g)
A'4(cnWg)
A"«L(L/Kg)
^.(cm'/g)
fegtyear)'1
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
//value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Dg value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database .(U.S. EPA 1994d).
£>„ value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1 994d).
Geometric mean value cited in U.S. EPA (1994c).
Kfg value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km for all
nonionizing organics except phthalates, PAHs, dioxins, and furans as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994c). KO,. value was calculated by using the recommended Km value
that is provided in this table.
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kof that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed fraction organic carbon of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd,,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the KK value that is provided in
this table.
Kd,,, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kof that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value Varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kdm value
was calculated by using the K^. value that is provided in this table.
Kdjp value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon of 0.04 in bottom sediment.
Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions, should be
used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies depending on the fraction of organic
fraction in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by using the
Kx value that is provided in this table.
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
-
-
-
-
Brl-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-2; B-2-2;
B-3-2; B-4-2
62.50
119.3
3.68E400
at25°C
(liquid)
7.30E+02
3.15E-01
1.58E-01
1.19E-05
1.40E+01
1.11E+02
1.11E-01
8.32E-01
4.44E-01
1.41E+00
A-3-670
-------
TABLE A-3-200
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR VINYL CHLORIDE (75-01-4)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Fv (unitless)
Reference and Explanation "
Chemical/Physical Properties (Continued)
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in this table.
Equations
Value
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
1.000000
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, fj.g/g DW plant .
" UglmL soil -water
rUglg DW plant \
fj.g/g soil
,Hglg DW plant \
fj,g/g soil
^g/g DW plant )
Uglg soil
,/ig/g DW plant )
pglg air
Bvforage
,Hglg DW plant.
/j,g/g air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that is
provided in this table. The value was converted to a dry weight basis by using a
moisture content of 87 percent.
Brrootve, value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table (see section A4.3.2 of Appendix A-3).
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km, value that
is provided in this table.
Br&ra& value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
K^ value that is provided in this table.
BVagValue was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
citea in Bacci and others (1990; 1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the Hand Km values that are provided in this
table.
Bvfaragf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a fector of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and K^, values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-10
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
8.08E+00
7.29E+01
8.42E+00
8.42E400
2.95E-06
2.95E-06
A-3-671
-------
TABLE A-3-200
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR VINYL CHLORIDE (75-01-4)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Ba^n (day/kg FW)
flaw(ds»y/kgFW)
So^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^,, (day/kg FW)
^iteun (day/kg FW)
5CFM
(L/kgVFW tissue)
&4FM(UkgFW)
BSAFf,h (unitless)
Reference and Explanation f : : , ;;
Equations
: vvVahie^::-;
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bomiac value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^,
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ito-ori value was calculated by using thethe fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19)
ana multiplying it with the Ba,^ value (see section A4.3.2 of Appendix A-3).
.BflUjf value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value
mat is provided in this table.
BaMdm value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba,^ value (see section A4.3.2 of Appendix A-3).
BAFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value above 4.0, as cited in U.S. EPA
(1995b). BAF values were predicted values calculated by multiplying a food chain
multiplier (FCM) with a geometric mean of various laboratory measured BCFs
obtained from various experimental studies cited in U.S. EPA (1998). FCMs were
obtained from U.S. EPA (1995bc) — See Appendix A-3.
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
1.11E-07
3.52E-07
4.26E-07
1.11E-04
2.78E-07
4.37E+00
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
R/D (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
RfC (mg/mj)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)'1
Inhalation CSF
(rug/kg/day)'1
-
U.S. EPA (1997c)
-
U.S. EPA (1997c)
U.S. EPA (1997c)
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
ND
1.9E+00
ND
8.4E-05
3.0E-01
Note:
NA * Not applicable
ND « No data available
AH parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-672
-------
TABLE A-3-201
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FORM-XYLENE (1330-20-7)
(Page 1 of 3)
' Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
-W^g/mole)
r«(K)
Vp(atsn)
S(mg/L)
/7(atnrm3/mol)
A, (cmVs)
A.(cmVs)
KW (unitless)
/^(rnL/g)
£4(cm'/g)
*^(L/Kg)
Ms (cnrYg)
fog (year)'1
Fv (unitless)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1992a).
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1992a).
ff value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Recommended K^ value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995).
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kds value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kol that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kda
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kds value was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in
this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kdb, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdbs, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the K^ value that is provided in this table.
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in the table.
-
-
— •
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-l;B-2-2;
B-3-l;B-3-2;
B-4-l;B-4-2
B-l-1 ;B-2-l;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
106.16
225.7
1.39E-05
at25°C
(liquid)
1.60E+02
9.26E-06
7.69E-02
8.49E-06
1.59E+03
1.96E+02
1.96E+00
1.47E+01
7.84E+00
9.03E+00
0.999957
A-3-673
-------
TABLE A-3-201
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR M-XYLENE (1330-20-7)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation v : * ; >":•
Equations
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, ftg/g DW plant ,
'pg/mL soil water'
.figfg DW plant.
ftglg soil
*W
,Hg/g DW plant.
Uglg soil
fttg/g DW plant.
(*g/g soil
eUglg DW plant.
Uglg air
,Hglg DW plant.
pglg air
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the K value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
Br^f,^ value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table.
Br^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
Br$ga& value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegroud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
KM, value that is provided in this table.
Bvag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and ft,* values that are provided in this table.
BVf^gt value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^, and H that is
citedui Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KM, values that are provided in this table.
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
Value
7.41E+01
3.78E+01
5.47E-01
5.47E-01
1.55E+01
1.55E+01
A-3-674
-------
TABLE A-3-201
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR M-XYLENE (1330-20-7)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Bamak (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Bflfc* (day/kg FW)
£aear (day/kg FW)
^Wcfan (day/kg FW)
JK2IJ*
(L/kgFW tissue)
AiFjn (L/kgFW)
BSAFflsh (unitless)
Reference and Explanation - • -""
> Equations *
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamm value was calculated by using the correlation equation with-K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^t value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
Ba value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was .calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided m this table.
BaMclca, value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation with K^
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
1.26E-05
3.99E-05
4.83E-05
1.26E-02
3.15E-05
1.60E+02
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RJD (mg/kg/day)
Oral CSF
•(mg/kg/day)'1
.R/C (mg/m3)
Inhalation URF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
U.S,EPA(1997b)
•-
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
2.0E+00
ND
7.0E+00
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-675
-------
TABLE A-3-202
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 0-XYLENE (1330-20-7)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation '•'•: : i : • -^ . : '--\ f: ":;
Equations
Value
Chemical/Physical Properties
MTfetoiole)
rw(K)
Vp(atea)
5(mg/L)
//(atnvm'/mol)
D.(cmVs)
AXcmVs)
tfw (unitless)
^(mL/g)
&/,(cmVg)
^(L/Kg)
A'<4, (cmVg)
ksgfycar)-1
Fv (unitless)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Montgomeiy and Welkom (1991)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1992a).
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1992a).
# value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
De value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Devalue was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Recommended K^, value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1995).
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation vntiiK^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate &/„
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in
this table.
Kd^, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A^ that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kd^ because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the KK value that is provided in this table.
A'A, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment Measured organic carbon m bottom sediment specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kd,,,, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the K^ value that is provided in this table.
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991). '
Fv value was calculated by using the equation cited in Junge (1977). Recommended
value of Fv was calculated by using the Vp value that is provided in the table.
-
-
-
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-l;B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
106.16
248.1
1.39E-05
at25°C
(liquid)
2.20E+02
6.73E-06
7.69E-02
8.44E-06
1.35E+03
2.41E+02
2.41E+00
1.81E+01
9.64E+00
9.03E+00
0.999957
A-3-676
-------
TABLE A-3-202
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR O-XYLENE (1330-20-7)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
I Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
, (tg/g DW plant -
soil water'
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited hi
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that is
provided in this table. The value was then converted to a dry weight basis by using
a moisture content of 87 percent.
6.61E+01
DW plant
in this table.
value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kds value provided
B-2-10
soil
.
2.74E+01
,IJ.glg DW plant\
soil
Brag value was calculated by using the correlation equation with-K^, that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the Km value that
is provided in this table.
B-2-9
6.01E-01
Br,
forage
,/tg/g DW plant.
fj.g/g soil
?rjBs°p> Y31"6 was calculated by using the correlation equation withX^, that is cited
in Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
abovegf oud produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
K^ value that is provided in this table.
B-3-9
6.01E-01
DWplant
/j.g/g air
^
Byag value was calculated by using the correlation equation withA^ and jRTthat is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vigni (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and Km values that are provided in this table.
B-2-8
1.79E+01
Bv,
DW plant
[tglg air
Byfarfs, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and /ftiiat is
cited m Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and VigM (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100.
No distinction was made between values for aboveground produce and forage.
Recommended value was calculated, for a temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H
and KW values that are provided in this table.
B-3-8
1.79E+01
A-3-677
-------
TABLE A-3-202
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR 0-XYLENE (1330-20-7)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation ';•"• M...--. • ;'-
Equations
Value
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
IfeUt (day/kg FW)
Ba^Hf (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
^(day/kgFW)
So««etB, (day/kg FW)
£CF/^.
(L/kgFW tissue)
£XFM(L/kgFW)
BSAFjM (unitless)
,8ermat value was calculated by using the correlation equation withK^ that is cited in
Travis and Anns (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided hi this table.
Ba^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^j. value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the fia^ value.
So, -.value was calculated by using the correlation equation with A^,, that is cited in
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table.
Ba^ta, value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Ba^ value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^, value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation with^,
obtained fiom Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980)— See Appendix A-3.
-
-
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12 '
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
1.07E-05
3.39E-05
4.10E-05
1.07E-02
2.68E-05
1.41E402
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
JR/D (mg/kg/day)
Oa/CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
fyC(mg/m3)
Mtalation URF
(pgAn5)'1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)*1
U.S.EPA (1997b)
-
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body weight
of 70 kg.
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
2.0E+00
ND
7.0E+00
ND
ND
Note:
NA m Not applicable
ND - No data available
All parameters arc defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-678
-------
TABLE A-3-203
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR P-XYLENE (1330-20-7)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter " ,
MF(g/mole)
r«(K).
Vp (atm)
S(mg/L)
//(atnvmVmol)
A,(cm2/s)
£»w(cm2/s)
Km (unitless)
JCXmL/g)
M(cm3/g)
fit, (I/Kg)
/^(cmVg)
fag (year)'1
Fv (vmitless)
: Reference and Explanation " -
Equations
Chemical/Physical Properties
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
Montgomery and Welkom (1991)
Vp value cited in U.S. EPA (1992a).
S value cited in U.S. EPA (1992a).
H value was calculated by using the theoretical equation from Lyman, Reehl, and
Rosenblatt (1982), which defines the constant. Recommended value was calculated
by using the MW, S, and Vp values that are provided in this table.
Da value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Dw value was obtained from CHEMDAT8 database (U.S. EPA 1994d).
Recommended K^ value cited in Karickhoff and Long (1 995).
Geometric mean of measured values obtained from U.S. EPA (1996b).
Kd, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Kol that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.01 in soil. Measured
organic carbon in soil, specific to site conditions, should be used to calculate Kd,,
because the value varies, depending on the fraction of organic carbon in soil.
Recommended Kd, value was calculated by using the K^ value that is provided in
this table.
Kd value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^. that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.075 in suspended
sediment. Measured organic carbon in suspended sediment, specific to site
conditions, should be used to calculate Kdm because the value varies, depending on
the fraction of organic carbon in suspended sediment. Recommended Kd^ value
was calculated by using the Koc value that is provided in this table.
Kdk, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Koc that is cited in
U.S. EPA (1993d) for an assumed organic carbon fraction of 0.04 in bottom
sediment. Measured organic carbon in bottom sediment, specific to site conditions,
should be used to calculate Kdb!, because the value varies, depending on the fraction
of organic carbon in bottom sediment. Recommended Kdbs value was calculated by
using the K^ value that is provided in this table.
Ksg value was calculated by using the chemical half-life in soil, as cited in Howard,
Boethling, Jarvis, Meylan, and Michalenko (1991).
Fv value was calculated by using equations cited in Junge (1977) and Bidleman
(1988). Recommended value of Fv was calculated by using Tm and Vp values that
are provided in this table.
-
-
—
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18; B-4-24
B-4-16; B-4-25
B-l-1; B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-1; B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1; B-3-7;
Value
106.16
286.1
1.39E-05
at25°C
(liquid)
2.15E+02
6.89E-06
7.61E+02
8.50E-06
1.48E+03
3.11E+02
3.11E+00
2.33E+01
1.24E+01
9.03E-H)0
0.999957
A-3-679
-------
TABLE A-3-203
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR P-XYLENE (1330-20-7)
(Page 2 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
Equations I Vatoe
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
RCF
WW plant
' uglmL soil water'
RCF value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Briggs (1982). Recommended value was calculated ay using the K^ value that is
provided in this table.
B-2-10
7.05E401
WWplant
BrnpfHg value was calculated by dividing the RCF value with the Kd, value provided
in this table.
B-2-10
Hg/g soil
^
2.27E+01
,(*g/g DW plant*
f^g/g soil
Brv value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited .in
Travis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for aboveground
produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value that
is provided in this table.
B-2-9
5.70E-01
,yg/g DW plant.
{Jtg/g soil
Brfyrq, value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited
inTravis and Arms (1988). No distinction was made between values for
aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated by using the
Km value that is provided in this table.
B-3-9 -
5.70E-01
f DW plant.
pg/g air
Bvex value was calculated by using the correlation equation with K^ and H that is
cited in Bacci, Calamari, Gaggi, and Vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and Km values that are provided in this
table.
B-2-8
1.93E-HH
,yg/g DW plant.
pgfg air
Bvfr—f value was calculated by
citedin Bacci, Calamari,
the correlation equation with Km, and H that is
vighi (1990); and Bacci, Cerejeira, Gaggi,
Chemello, Calamari, and Vighi (1992); then reducing this value by a factor of 100,
as recommended by U.S. EPA (1993d). No distinction was made between values
for aboveground produce and forage. Recommended value was calculated, for a
temperature (T) of 25°C, by using the H and K^, values that are provided in this
table.
B-3-8
1.93E-H)1
A-3-680
-------
TABLE A-3-203
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR P-XYLENE (1330-20-7)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation ' •
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamllt (day/kg FW)
SflW(day/kgFW)
B0port (day/kg FW)
Baege (day/kg FW)
^flUfcte, (day/kg FW)
flCFj,*
(L/kgFW tissue)
&4F^(L/kgFW)
BSAFfck (unitless)
Ban(,t value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^
value that is provided in this table.
Bahe^ value was calculated by using the correlation equation with Km that is cited in
Travis and Arms (1988). Recommended value was calculated by using the Km
value that is provided in this table.
Ba^t value was calculated by using the fat content ratio of pork to beef (23/19) and
multiplying it with the Bahetf value.
Ba value was calculated by using the correlation equation wilh^, that is cited m
California EPA (1993). Recommended value was calculated by using the K^ value
that is provided in this table. • .
£«,*<:&,, value was calculated by using the fet content ratio of chicken to beef (15/19)
and multiplying it with the Babetf value.
BCFs were used for compounds with a log K^ value below 4.0, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b). BCF^ value calculated using the correlation equation with K^
obtained from Veith, Macek, Petrocelli, and Caroll (1980) — See Appendix A-3.
-
- _ - '.''"•.'.
Equations
Value
B-3-11
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
1.18E-05
3.72E-05
4.50E-05
1.18E-02
2.93E-05
1.51E+02
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
RfD (mg/kg/day)
Oa/ CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
RfC (mg/m3)
Inhalation USF
(Mg/m3)-1
Inhalation CSF
(mg/kg/day)'1
U.S.EPA (1997b)
• . • •
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 inVday and a human body weight
of70kg.
,- . , . . . . . ....... . .. . .
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-l'
C-2-2
2.0E+00
ND
7.0E+00
ND
ND
Note:
NA = Not applicable
ND = No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-681
-------
TABLE A-3-204
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ZINC (7440-66-6)
(Page 1 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation ;
/ Equations :
Chemical/Physical Properties
MF(g/mole)
r«fK)
Pp(atm)
S(mg/L)
/f(atm-mVmol)
£>.(cmz/s)
£>w(cmVs)
^(unitless)
/^(tnL/g)
/^(mL/g)
ttkCUKg)
J?4,(mL/g)
Aar£(year)-l
FY (unitless)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman( 1989)
Budavari, O'Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
All metals, except mercury, are assumed to be nonvolatile at ambient
temperatures.
All metals, except mercury, are assumed to be insoluble in water.
OR Budavari, O^Neil, Smith, and Heckelman (1989)
H value is assumed to be zero, because the Vp and S values are zero for all
metals, except mercury.
Da value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
Z)w value was calculated using the equation cited in U.S. EPA (1996a).
—
—
Kd, value was obtained from U.S. EPA (1996), which provides pH-based values
that were estimated by using the MTNTEQ2 geochemical speciation model.
Kd^ value is assumed to be same as the Kd, value, because organic carbon does
not play a major role in sorption for the metals, as cited in U.S. EPA (1994f).
Kdt, value is assumed to be same as the Kds value, because organic carbon does
not play a major role in sorption for the metals, as cited in U.S. EPA (1994f).
—
Because they are nonvolatile, metals are assumed to be 100 percent in
paniculate phase and zero percent in the vapor phase, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1994f).
-
-
~
-
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-2-8; B-3-6;
B-4-6; B-4-12;
B-4-19
B-l-6; B-2-6;
B-3-6; B-4-6;
B-4-21
B-4-20
-
-
B-l-3; B-l-4;
B-l-5; B-l-6;
B-2-3; B-2-4;
B-2-5; B-2-6;
B-2-10; B-3-3;
B-3-4; B-3-5;
B-3-6; B-4-3;
B-4-4; B-4-5;
B-4-6; B-4-10;
B-4-11
B-4-16;
B-4-18;
B-4-24
B-4-16;
B-4-25
B-l-l;B-l-2;
B-2-1; B-2-2;
B-3-1; B-3-2;
B-4-l;B-4-2
B-l-1; B-2-1;
B-2-7; B-2-8;
B-3-1 ;B-3-7;
B-3-8; B-4-1;
B-4-8; B-4-9;
B-4-12; B-5-1
-. '•-; '- Value- '•'.;,.
65.38
692.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.17E-01
1.36E-05
NA
NA
6.2E+01 at
pH=6.8
6.2E+01 at
pH=6.8
6.2E+01 at
pH=6.8
ND
0.000000
A-3-682
-------
TABLE A-3-204
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ZINC (7440-66-6)
(Pace 2 of 3)
T^araiTiBtct*
RCF
, /J,g/g DW plant -
" fj.g/mL soil -water
Dj.
^^rootveg
,l*glg DW plant.
pglg soil
Brag
,Hglg DWplant^
f^g/g soil
Brag^t)
,/^g/g DW plant.
/j.g/g soil
Brforage
,/j.g/g DW plant )
Hg/g soil
Brg,aln
^glg DWplant^
ftg/g soil
Bvag
^glg DWplant^
f^g/g air
Bvforage
,fj.glg DW plant j
pglg air
Baattk (day/kg FW)
* • Reference and explanation
Biotransfer Factors for Plants
~~
BrraoM, value was calculated by multiplying the uptake slope factor with a
conversion factor of 2 x 10' g/ha soil. The uptake slope factor and the
conversion factor were obtained from U.S. EPA (1992b) for root vegetables.
.ft- ,var value was calculated by multiplying the uptake slope factor with a
conversion factor of 2 x 109 g/ha soil. The uptake slope factor and the
conversion factor were obtained from U.S. EPA (1992b) for garden fruits.
Br ' ,„,, value was calculated by weighting the uptake slope factors for garden
fruits (75%) and leafy vegetables (25%) and multiplying the result with a
conversion factor of 2 x 109 g/ha soil. The uptake slope factors and the
conversion factor were obtained from U.S. EPA (1992b).
Brrootve, value was calculated by multiplying the uptake slope factor with a
conversion factor of 2 x 109 g/ha soil. The uptake slope factor and the
conversion factor were obtained from U.S. EPA (1992b) for leafy vegetables.
Br^n, value was calculated by multiplying the uptake slope factors with a
conversion factor of 2 x 109 g/ha soil. The uptake slope factor and the
conversion factor were obtained from U.S. EPA (1992b) for grains/cereals.
Metals are assumed to not experience air-to-leaf transfer, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1995b).
Metals are assumed to not experience air-to-leaf transfer, as cited hi -
U.S. EPA (1995b).
Equations | Value
B-2-10
B-2-9
B-3-9
B-3-9
B-3-9
B-2-8
B-3-8
Biotransfer Factors for Animals
Bamllk values were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995a) for cadmium, selenium, and
zinc. Values were calculated by dividing uptake slopes, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1992b; 1995a), by a daily consumption rate of 20 kilograms dry
weight per day and converting the result to a wet weight basis assuming a 87%
moisture content in milk.
B-3-11
ND
4.40E-02
4.60E-02
9.70E-02
2.50E-01
5.40E-02
NA
NA
3.25E-05
A-3-683
-------
TABLE A-3-204
CHEMICAL-SPECIFIC INPUTS FOR ZINC (7440-66-6)
(Page 3 of 3)
Parameter
Reference and Explanation
^filiations
'Value'1''"'" '•' ;
Biotransfer Factors for Animals (Continued)
Bat^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
Ba^ (day/kg FW)
5afj«.-i*i (day/kg FW)
BC/VM
(L/kgFW tissue)
JWF^ (L/kgFW)
JJSK^ (unitless)
SfD (mg/kg/day)
Oa/CSF1
[mg/kg/day)"1
#C(mgAnJ)
Inhalation URF
tee/my
'nhalation CSF
fmE/kg/day)"1
Ba^f values were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995a) for cadmium, selenium, and
zinc. Values were calculated by dividing uptake slopes, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1992b; 1995a), by a daily consumption rate of 20 kilograms dry
weight per day and converting the result to a wet weight basis assuming a 70%
moisture content in beef.
Bafari. values were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995a) for cadmium, selenium, and
zinc. Values were calculated by dividing uptake slopes, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1992b; 1995a), by a daily consumption rate of 4.7 kilograms dry
weight per day and converting the result to a wet weight basis assuming a 70%
moisture content in pork.
Baftg values were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995a) for cadmium, selenium, and
zinc. Values were calculated by dividing uptake slopes, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1992b; 1995a), by a daily consumption rate of 0.2 kilograms dry
weight per day and converting the result to a wet weight basis assuming a 75%
moisture content in eggs.
•foUfcjot values were obtained from U.S. EPA (1995a) for cadmium, selenium,
and zinc. Values were calculated by dividing uptake slopes, as cited in
U.S. EPA (1992b; 1995a), by a daily consumption rate of 0.2 kilograms dry
weight per day and converting the result to a wet weight basis assuming a 75%
moisture content in chicken.
Geometric mean value obtained from various literature sources (see Appendix
A3.4.).
-
-
B-3-10
B-3-12
B-3-13
B-3-14
B-4-26
B-4-27
B-4-28
9.00E-05
1.28E-04
8.75E-03
8.75E-03
6.54E+02
NA
NA
Health Benchmarks
U.S. EPA (1997b)
-
Calculated from RfD using an inhalation rate of 20 mVday and a human body
weight of 70 kg.
-
-
C-l-8
C-l-7
C-2-3
C-2-1
C-2-2
3.0E-01
ND
1.1E+00
ND
ND
Note:
NA - Not applicable:
ND « No data available
All parameters are defined in list of FATE AND TRANSPORT PARAMETERS on page A-3-iii.
A-3-684
-------
APPENDIX A-4
ACUTE INHALATION EXPOSURE CRITERIA
-------
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-4
July 1998
TABLE A-4
ACUTE INHALATION EXPOSURE CRITERIA
(Page 1 of 6)
< - ' - * s v 4 „-.*
; ' , Compound v * -
Acetophenone
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
Aniline
Anthracene
Benzene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzyl Chloride
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane (Methyl bromide)
Butanone, 2- (Methyl Ethyl Ketone)
Butylbenzyl Phthalate
Carbon Tetrachloride
Carbon Bisulfide
Chlordane
Chloroaniline, p-
Chlorobenzene
, CASNtnttber, "f
98-86-2
107-02-8
107-13-1
62-53^3
120-12-7
71-43-2
56-55-3 -
50-32-8
205-99-2
207r08r9 .
100-44-7
75-27-4
75-25-2
74^83-9
78-93-3
85-68-7
56-23-5
75-tf-O
57-74-9
106-47-8
108-90-7
AEOI«-1
;
3.01E+01
2.29E-01'
2.17E+01"
5.98E+00
-
1.60E+02"
-
1.00E+00
-
-- '
S.ISE+OO0
- •
1.55E+01
5.83E+01
8.85E+02
-
1.26E+02"
3.74E+01
1.49E+00
3.00E+01
3.45E+02
U.S. EPA.Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-4-l
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-4
July 1998
TABLE A-4
ACUTE INHALATION EXPOSURE CRITERIA
(Page 2 of 6)
Compound
Chlorobenzilate
Chloroethyl ether, 2-bis
Chloroform (Trichloromethane)
Chlororaethane (Methyl chloride)
Chloronaphthalene, 2-
Chlorophenol, 2-
Chrysene
Cresol, p-
Cresol, o-
Cresol, m-
DDE
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Dibromo-3-Chloropropane, 1,2-
Dibutyl Phthalate
Dichlorobenzene, 1,2-
Dichlorobenzene, 1,4-
Dichlorobenzidine, 3,3'-
Dichlorodifluorotnethane
Dichloroethane (Ethylene Dichloride), 1,2-
Dichloroethane, 1,1-
Dichloroethene, l,2-(trans)
CAS Number
510-15-6
111-44-4
67-66-3
74-87-3
91-58-7
95-57-8
218-01-9
106-44-5
95-48-7
108-39-4
72-55-9
53-70-3
96-12-8
84-74-2
95-50-1
106-46-7
91-94-1
75-71-8
107-06-2
75-34-3
540-59-0
AEGL-1
(rag/m9)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ERPG-1
(mg/m»)
-
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ATEL-l
(mg/m3)
—
—
3.56E-01
—
-
—
—
—
-
--
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
-
TEEL-I
(rngto*)
_
5.85E+01
4.88E+02
2.07E+02
5.99E-01
6.31E+00
2.99E-01
6.63E+01"
6.63E+01b
6.63E+01b
3.00E+01
3.01E+01
_
1.50E+01
3.01E+02
6.61E+02
6.21E+00
1.48E+04
8.09E+00
1.21E+03
2.38E+03
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-4-2
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-4 .
July 1998
TABLE A-4
ACUTE INHALATION EXPOSURE CRITERIA
(Page 3 of 6)
Compound ' "^
Dichloroethene, 1,1-
Dichlorophenol, 2,4-
Dichloropropane, 1,2-
Dichloropropene, l,3-(cis)
Diethyl Phthalate
Dimethoxybenzidine, 3,3'-
Dinitrobenzene, 1,3-
Dinitrophenol, 2,4- .' - ' ,
Dinitrotoluene, 2,4-
Dinitrotoluene, 2,6-
Dioxane (1,4-Diethyleneoxide), 1,4-
Diphenylhydrazine, 1,2-
Epichldrohydrin (l-Chloro-2,3-epoxypropane) •
Ethyl Methacrylate
Ethyl Methanesulfonate
Ethyl Benzene
Ethylene Oxide
Ethylene Dibromide
Fluoranthene
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobenzene (Perchlorobenzene)
CAS Number
. 75-35-4
120-83-2 .
78-87-5
542-75-6
84-66-2
119-90-4
99-65-0
51-28-5
121-14-2
606-20-2
123-91-1
122-66-7
106-89-8
97-63-2
62-50-0
100-41-4
. 75-21-8 .
106-93-4
206-44-0
76-44-8
118-74-1
A1GL-1
(Mg/m?)
-
-
_ .
-
-
-
-- '
-~
-
-:
- . _ • - ' v
-' ; ' '
'
~. '""
-
-
-
.
-
- •- : -
ERPG-1
(mgf*&\
-
•. -
_
-
-
-
• -
-
• ' -
-
7.57E+00
- -
•
• -'• .'
-
--
, ^ -r
-
~
>TEL»1 ,
^(mg/ft3).
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
1.80E+00
' -r-
7.95E-01
".'_
-
..
-
-
-
-
TEEt-1
(mg/m3)
7.93E+01
3.00E+01
5.08E+02
1.36E+01
1.50E+01
5.00E+00
-
9.79E-01
4.47E-01
4.47E-01
2.70E+02
3.00E+01
7.57E+00^
" ~
-
5.43E+02
9.01E+00
2.31E+02
-
1.50E-01
7.45E-02
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-4-3
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-4
July 1998
TABLE A-4
ACUTE INHALATION EXPOSURE CRITERIA
(Page 4 of 6)
Compound
Hexachlorobutadiene (Perchlorobutadiene)
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachloroethane (Perchloroethane)
Hexachlorophene
bideno(l,2)3-cd)pyrene
Methoxychlor
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
N-Nitroso di-n-Butylamine
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
Pentachlorobenzene
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
Phthalic Anhydride (1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic Anhydride)
Pyridine
Safrole(5-(2-Propenyl)-l,3-Benzodioxole)
Strychnine
Styrene
Tetrachlorethane, 1,1,1,2-
C AS Number
87-68-3
77-47-4
67-72-1
70-30-4
193-39-5
72-43-5
108-10-1
75-09-2
924-16-3
91-20-3
98-95-3
608-93-5
82-68-8
87-86-5
108-95-2
85-44-9
110-86-1
94-59-7
57-24-9
100-42-5
630-20-6
AEGL-1
(mg/m3)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
ERPG-1
(mg/m3)
3.20E+01
-
-
-
-
-
-
6.95E+02
-
~
'
-
-
-
3.85E+01
-
~
-
~
2.13E+02
-
ATEL-1
(mg/ni3)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8.16E+01
-
-
-
-
-
--
~
-
-
-
--
2.16E+01
- --
TEEL-1
(mg/m3)
3.20E+01"
2.23E-01
2.90E+01
3.00E+01
-
-
3.07E+02
6.95E+02"
-
7.86E+01
1.51E+01
l.OOE+00
1.45E+00
1.53E+00
3.85E+01*
1.80E+01
4.85E+01
-
3.01E-01
2.13E+02a
6.18E+01
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-4-4
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-4
July 1998
TABLE A-4
ACUTE INHALATION EXPOSURE CRITERIA
(Page 5 of 6)
• ' ", „ Compound , " • \ , /"-
Tetrachlorobenzene, 1,2,4,5-
Tetrachlorodibenzo(p) dioxin, 2,3,7,8-
Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2-
Tetrachloroethene
Tetrachlorophenol, 2,3,4,6-
Toluene
Toluidine, o-
Trichlorobenzene, 1,2,4-
Trichloroethane, 1,1,2-
Trichloroethylene
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
Trichlorophenol, 2,4,5-
Trichlorophenol, 2,4,6-
Trichloropropane, 1,2,3-
Trinitrobenzene, 1,3,5- ......
Vinyl Acetate
Vinyl Chloride
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
'r1
CAS NumW „.,
95-94-3
1746-01-6
79-34-5
127-18-4
58-90-2
108-88-3
95-53-4
120-82-1
79-00-5
79-01-6
75-69-4
95-95-4
88-06-2
96-18-4
99-35-4
108-05-4
75-01-04
7440-36-0
7440-38-2
7440-39-3
7440-41-7
-s AEGL-1 - -,
(mg/m3) - s
-
-
-
-
' - ' •
-
-
- :• , .,
'
--
- --
- •
•' • ' - •
..
,.
-
-
-
-
-
--
^ERPG-1 '' ,
(mg/itt3) ,;
-
--
-
6.78E+02
'
1.88E+02
-^
. . -
-
5.37E+02
„
-
*. • ••-
• . ..
„
1.76E+01
-
-
-
- -
-
ATEW
;- , f (n»g/m*),&
-
-
-
-
3.66E+01
-
~.
- -
•
- '
-• -
•
_.-.-.-
-
-
2.07E+02
-
-
-
-
t TEEL-1
, < (mg/ni1)
3.00E+01
-
2.06E+01
6.78E+02"
-
1.88E+023
2.63E+01
2.23E+01
1.64E+02
5.37E+02"
2.81E+03
2.99E+01
3.00E+01
-
3.00E+01
1.76E+01"
1.28E+01
1.49E+00
3.00E-02
1.52E+00
9.95E-03
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
. A-4-5
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol
Appendix A-4
July 1998
TABLE A-4
ACUTE INHALATION EXPOSURE CRITERIA
(Page 6 of 6)
Compound
Cadmium
Chromium (Total)
Chromium (hexayalent)
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
CAS Number
7440-43-9
7440-47-3
18540-29-9
7439-92-1
7439-97-6
7440-02-0
7782-49-2
7440-22-4
7440-28-0
AEGL4
(mg/m3)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
ERPG-1
(mg/m3)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ATEL-1
(mg/in3)
—
—
_
—
_
1.56E-03
2.94E-03
-
TEEL-1
(mg/m3)
2.99E-02
1.49E+00
1.50E-01
3.81E-02
7.38E-02
3.00E+00
5.81E-01
3.00E-01
Notes:
Bolded values are the U.S. EPA OSW recommended AffiCvalues for a few potential COPCs.
milligrams per cubic meter
AIEC value not available
Chemical abstract service
Level 1 Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for 1-hour exposure durations (NAC 1997)
Level 1 Emergency Response Planning Guideline Levels (SCAPA 1997b)
Level 1 Acute Toxic Exposure Levels (Cal/EPA 1995)
Level 1 Temporary Emergency Exposure Limits (SCAPA 1997a)
TEEL-1 value is based on ERPG-1 value
Equals TEEL-1 value for sum of all three cresol isomers.
mg/m3 =
CAS
AEGL-1 =
ERPG-1 =
ATEL-1 =
TEEL-1 =
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
Center for Combustion Science and Engineering
U.S. EPA
Office of Solid Waste
A-4-6
-------
|