United States
 Environmental Protection
 Agency
Solid Waste and
Emergency Response
(5306W)
EPA-530-F-00-001b
June 2000
www.epa.gov/osw
  Erickson's Diversified
  Corporate
  Headquarters
 Hudson, Wisconsin
 69% Reduction of Construction Materials
 Erickson's Diversified Corporation, a company that develops and manages grocery stores,
 decided to incorporate environmental considerations into the construction of its new
 headquarters. In order to reduce the impact on area landfills, Erickson's, along with its
 consultants and contractor, developed a materials management plan that required
 diversion of 75% of construction discards by volume. Erickson's reached this goal, diverting
 69% of the materials by weight.
Project Description

   Although the concept of recovering
   construction materials was new to Erickson's
Diversified, it developed a materials
management plan that recovered 75% by
 volume (69% by weight) of C&D debris
  generated during the construction of its new
   headquarters.
        The  newly constructed headquarters,
    with almost 28,000 square feet of floor
     space, consists of two floors and a
     basement garage.
         Implementation of the materials
     management plan was responsible for
    much of the project's success. The plan
     provided subcontractors with instructions
          on reduction, reuse and recycling
            techniques, and sorting methods.
            It required each subcontractor to:
              • complete a report on their
          predicted C&D debris generation;
              • designate a contact person
          who would attend staff meetings
         and inform other crew members
         about C&D debris management
         requirements and project progress;
              • source separate materials
          and document materials generated
          using a Waste Management
          Periodic Report;
                 • minimize storage and packaging discards;
                 • consider the reuse potential of temporary
             construction materials such as bracing; and
                 • use standard size product samples, such
             as tile, so the samples could be used in the final
             construction.
                 Good communication among team
             members was another major factor in the
             success of the project. The client, contractor, and
             consultant presented the project's goals and
             objectives to subcontractors and their crews in
             simple, easily understood terms. The client
             reinforced its commitment to achieving
             environmental goals by attending weekly site
             meetings and talking with workers. The project
             consultant wrote and periodically dispersed
             newsletters informing all workers of the project's


                     Materials Collected
                       aluminum cans, cardboard, concrete,
                       miscellaneous metal (cut offs,
                       banding, from shipments, ducts, steel
                       stud cut offs, mattress springs, roof
                       metal, rebar, roof decking), office
                       paper, wood (cut offs, pallets, crating
                       and packaging, old forms)
                     Salvaged for Reuse
                       bricks,canvas bags, carpeting,
                       concrete curing tarp, concrete mix,
                       gypsum board, insulation, lumber,
                       miscellaneous metal, metal angle,
                       plywood, steel frames, stone caps
                       and remnants, wire spools, wood and
                       pallets

-------
progress. The consultant invited the
general contractor and subs to go on field
trips to recycling facilities to reinforce the
purpose of recovery. Also, workers were
reminded of the project's objectives
through daily interaction with lead
contacts, the project superintendent, and
the project manager. Even the hauler
helped facilitate materials recovery and
reduce contamination by finding available
space for recycling bins, and providing
signs labeling each bin.
    Erickson's Diversified and its
contractor encountered no major
obstacles during the project and found
that it was easy, cost-effective, and
enjoyable to create a C&D debris
management plan and implement it on
the construction site.
Costs/Benefits
   During the construction of its new
   headquarters, Erickson's Diversified
discovered that materials recovery saves
money.  Initially, the contractor estimated
        Project Summary
 Date Started
November 1995
 Date Completed         December 1996
 Project Square Footage          28,000
 Total Waste Generated (Tons)     270.6
 Disposed (Tons)                 85.3
 Diversion (Tons)                185.3
     Recycled                    157.3
     Salvaged                     28.1
 Total Materials Diverted          68.5%
 Total Construction Cost      $4,700,000
 Hauling and Disposal Costs ($/Ton)    MA
 Materials Diversion Costs (Savings)
     Planning and
         Development           $4,300
     Labor                        NA
     Materials/Equipment            NA
     Hauling and Tip Fees            NA
 Revenue / Savings from Materials Diversion
     Revenue from Materials Sales      $0
     Savings from Materials Reuse      $0
     Savings from Avoided Hauling
         and Disposal               NA
 Cost/(Savings) from Diversion        NA
 Cost/(Savings) per Square Foot       NA

 Key: NA = not available.
that materials recovery would
increase the project costs
because of the need for
additional recycling bins and
separation of recyclables.
However, materials diversion
costs were less than predicted
and, in fact, project costs
would have been more if
Erickson's Diversified had not
required their general
contractor to recover
construction debris.
Recovering the 185 tons of
materials diverted required
more  planning and labor than would have
been necessary if the materials had been
disposed.  For example, Erickson's
Diversified paid a consulting firm over
$4,300 for planning, developing, and
reporting upon the project's progress. The
general contractor incurred additional
labor costs for source separation and
additional crew training. Not all
materials recovery methods
increased costs. Labor costs were
lowered through the reduction of
packing materials, because crew
members spent less time
unpacking materials and
hauling packaging to the bins.
The hauler handled the removal of
recyclables and charged  lower rates for
this service than for landfilling.
    Erickson's Diversified donated all
reusable materials to the public and did
not receive any revenue from materials
diversion.

Tips for Replication

•   Establish a clear numerical goal for
the project.
•   Choose a general contractor and
subcontractors who can demonstrate a
commitment to reducing disposal.
•   Provide source reduction, reuse, and
recycling forms to project managers and
haulers to make data reporting easier.
•   Communicate the goal and report
project progress, success, and failures to
                                                                       «.;'
                                                                                         site.
                                                                                  the project
                                                             everyone involved.
                                                             •    If possible, hire haulers who can offer
                                                             all-inclusive recycling and waste hauling
                                                             services.
                                                             Client
                                                             Erickson's Diversified
                                                             Corporation
                                                             509 Second Street
                                                             Hudson, Wisconsin 54016
                                                             Contact: Amy Briesacher (Director of
                                                             Environmental and Community Action)
                                                             Phone: 715-386-9315 Fax: 715-386-1013
                                                             Consultant
                                                             LHB Engineers & Architects
                                                             250 Third Avenue North, Suite 450
                                                             Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401
                                                             Contact: Joel Schurke (Project Manager)
                                                             Phone: 612-338-2029 Fax: 612-338-2088
                                                             E-mail: joel.schurke@LHBcorp.com
                                                             Web site: http://www.LHBcorp.com
                                                             General Contractor
                                                             Watson-Forsberg Co.
                                                             1433 Utica Avenue South, Suite 252
                                                             Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416
                                                             Contact: Paul Kolias (Project Manager)
                                                             Phone: 612-544-7761 Fax: 612-544-1826

-------