United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
EPA530-K-99-007
iponse December 1999
www.epa.gov
Collection
Strategies for Success
1 4i
eoat»
-------
Want to cut your residential solid waste collection costs up to 40 percent and
still provide all the services your customers expect? New strategies for improv-
ing collection efficiency can help! In today's competitive waste management mar-
ket, customers want a wide variety of collection options at competitive rates.
The solid waste management industry has evolved to meet many of those
expectations. Even if you already have a satisfactory program, you can achieve
greater success through system improvements such as new technologies, better
collection vehicles, and new methods of routing. These developments in the
solid waste industry make it the perfect time to evaluate your program and
adopt new strategies to improve service and reduce costs.
Contents
I Evaluating Your Program
I Realizing the Rewards
2 Cost-Cutting Strategies
3 Collection Frequency: Less Is Often Best
5 Automation: Making Collection Faster and Easier
7 Dual Collection: One Truck, Two Waste Streams
9 Crew Productivity: Motivating Employees
II Contracting: Competition and Collection Costs
13 Collection Change: Communicating to Build Support
15 Frequently Asked Questions
-------
Evaluating "four Program
Evaluating and fine-tuning your solid waste system begins with a detailed system analysis. This analysis,
or "snapshot," allows you to select the collection improvement strategies that make the most sense for
your community Your system snapshot also gives you the baseline needed to develop a cost-effective
long-range plan that provides for continuous improvement and reevaluation. In addition, this plan will
supply the flexibility you need to address the rapid changes occurring within the solid waste manage-
ment industry
Realizing the Rewards
Your system snapshot shows where you've been and where you are now regarding your collection sys-
tem. Once you get a handle on the past and present, you can plan for the future. There are numerous
cost-cutting strategies to help make the future of your collection system successful, including reducing
the frequency of collection, implementing dual collection of solid waste and recyclables, and automating
collection practices. Regardless of the strategy you adopt, you're bound to see impressive results.
Collection costs (Figure 1) typically represent between 40 and 60 percent of a community's solid waste
management system costs, so even small changes in collection programs can yield big results. In addition,
you also might realize intangible benefits such as increased customer satisfaction and employee morale.
In this booklet you'll take a closer look at several strategies for improving collection efficiency. The fact
sheets explain how the strategies work, list the benefits they provide, and offer concrete examples of
communities currently realizing the rewards of collection system improvements. They are doing it, and so
can you!
MSW Management System Costs Generals, r Collection
Administrative
Landfill 15%
Facilities
Transfer
Source: Integrated Municipal Solid Waste Management: Six Case Studies of System, Cost and
Energy Use: Summary Report. 1995, SWANA, 50 pp, GR-G 2700.
0
Z5
00
OJ
'BO
OJ
u
c
c
O
V>
I
O
u
-------
Cost-Cutting Strategies
OJ
'00
OJ
u
c
0)
O
Communities of all sizes, terrains, and climates have successfully cut costs and improved service by using
the following strategies:
Reducing Collection Frequency
The growing trend, even in the hottest climates, is to eliminate the second municipal solid waste (MSW) col-
lection day or replace the second collection day with a recyclables or yard-trimmings collection.
Automating Collection
Automated and semiautomated collection vehicles improve efficiency and reduce costs. Both vehicle
types reduce labor demand and reduce the risk of worker injury.
Decreasing Fleet Size With Dual Collection
Dual collection systems reduce total fleet and labor costs by decreasing the number of special vehicles
needed to provide multiple collection services.
Increasing Employee Productivity
Local governments and private haulers that employ new management techniques, such as revised organi-
zational structures, updated pay and incentive programs, new training initiatives, modified performance
appraisal systems, and new job descriptions, note improved employee morale and rising productivity.
Contracting and Competition
A well-designed competitive procurement is the key to obtaining the most reasonable rates and highest
quality service. Even when collection has traditionally been provided by the public sector, competition is
proving effective. Some jurisdictions use privatization to get the most cost-effective system. Other com-
munities allow private haulers to compete with public crews for the right to provide collection services,
which can result in public sector innovation, lower costs, and higher quality.
"o
U
-------
Collection Frequency: Less Is Often Best
When it comes to picking up municipal solid waste (MSW) and recyclables, less
is often best. Offering collection services less often can, in many cases, decrease
costs and increase the amount of waste diverted from disposal. Although twice-
per-week pickup is still popular in many parts of the country (especially the
South), more and more communities are successfully making the change to
weekly pickup.
Why Change?
In spite of the perceived need for twice-per-week collection, studies repeatedly
demonstrate that the second collection day is underutilized. The availability of
recycling and composting programs helps reduce the need for two MSW pickups
even further. The use of "Pay-As-You-Throw" fee structures, where households are
charged according to the amount of waste they set out for collection, also helps
reduce the need for two pickups per week.
While the impacts of changing collection frequency vary, studies show that reducing MSW collection
frequency typically:
• Decreases COStS! Reducing collection frequency lowers operating costs by improving operational
productivity. With less frequent collection, residents set out more waste for each collection, making
vehicle trips more productive.
• Decreases Vehicle and labor needs: Reducing collection frequency cuts MSW collection
vehicle needs by 20 to 40 percent. Fewer trucks translates to savings in labor, capital, and mainte-
nance costs.
• Reduces environmental impacts: Reducing collection frequency means fewer trucks, lower
fuel usage, and fewer air emissions, as well as reduced traffic and safety impacts on community streets.
• Provides opportunities for new or expanded services: Reducing collection frequency
helps to establish or expand recyclables or yard-trimmings collection programs. Municipalities can
implement new programs while still preventing fleet and staffing increases.
• Increases Waste diversion: Reducing collection frequency increases participation in diversion
programs for recyclables and yard-trimmings.
• Balances Workload: Reducing collection frequency increases collection route productivity by
spreading out the total amount of residential MSW to be picked up each week more evenly among the
available work days.
00
<_
,o
&0
OJ
u
c
c
o
~O
U
-------
0
00
<_
,o
&0
OJ
u
c
-------
Automation:
Making Collection Faster and Easier
Once hailed as "tomorrow's key to improving collection efficiency," automation
is today's solution to making collection more cost-effective. Traditionally, collect-
ing MSW is a labor-intensive business, often requiring as many as three workers
per vehicle to lift and dump disposal containers. With the advent of automated
lifting systems, however, collection requires fewer workers, thereby reducing
labor costs and workers' compensation claims.
How Does Automated Collection Work?
Semiautomated and fully automated systems are the two main approach-
es to reducing the demands of manual MSW collection. Both systems
rely on special trucks with mechanical or hydraulic lifting systems and
require customers to use special wheeled carts.
With semiautomated vehicles, crews wheel the carts to the collection
vehicle and line them up with "flippers" (i.e., hydraulic lifting devices mounted on the truck body), acti-
vate the lifting mechanism, then return empty containers to the collection point. The use of semiauto-
mated vehicles decreases demand for manual lifting, but it does not eliminate the need for manual labor.
In fully automated vehicles, drivers control hydraulic arms or grippers from the vehicle cab. Unless there
are problems—overflow materials, improperly prepared materials, obstructed set-outs, or the need for
roll-out assistance—the driver can service a route without leaving the collection vehicle.
What Are the Benefits?
What drives local governments and haulers to consider automating
iving:
MSW
collection? The benefits include
ies as well
the following:
• Reduced injury risk: Increased automation typically reduces work-related lifting injuries
as puncture wounds and lacerations.
• Reduced Vehicle needs: Fully automated collection increases (by up to 300 percent) the
number of households served per worker, per hour. This increased productivity typically results in
a smaller vehicle fleet.
OJ
u
Z5
00
&0
OJ
u
c
q
'
~o
U
-------
• Decreased labor needs: Automated collection reduces crew size per
truck. For semiautomated collection, one- or two-person crews are the norm.
With fully automated systems, the driver typically works alone.
• Reduced environmental impacts: Automated collection means fewer
trucks, lower fuel usage, fewer air emissions, and fewer traffic and safety impacts on community streets.
Reduced tipping fees: Carts with lids help keep water, ice, and snow from set-outs, which also
helps control the weight of set-outs and decreases tipping fees.
Improved neighborhood aesthetics: Uniform containers eliminate unsightly set-outs.
Containers with lids are less likely to be tipped over or torn apart by animals, reducing litter potential.
Reduced public health risks; Containers with lids help mitigate odor and health concerns.
What Are the Keys to Success?
13
LO
OJ
'BO
OJ
u
c
O
V»
I
d
Local governments that successfully increased automation offer the following keys for planning and
responding to customer needs:
• Consider local geographic Conditions: Before investing in new collection technology test the
vehicles and containers under the range of weather or traffic conditions common to your community.
Narrow streets, one-way streets, streets with "bumper-to-bumper" on-street parking, and dead-ends or
tight cul-de-sacs present special challenges for automated collection vehicles. In addition, high winds or
other weather conditions will influence your choice of vehicles and carts.
• Consider impact on vehicle maintenance:
Most semiautomated and fully automated collection vehicles have complex hydraulic systems that
require more maintenance than manual collection equipment. Factory training programs help make sure
your fleet maintenance facilities and personnel can meet the increased maintenance demands. While
per-vehicle maintenance costs often rise with automation, total fleet maintenance costs typically drop
because there are fewer trucks to maintain.
• Develop a Staff reduction plan: Automated collection equipment requires fewer employees per
truck, so what do you do with the extra staff? Some communities time the phase-in of automation with
expected employee attrition rates. Other communities use a combination of attrition, retraining pro-
grams, interdepartmental transfers, and early retirement incentives to achieve staffing reductions with-
out lay-offs.
• Provide assistance for residents who cannot handle larger set-outs: Depending on
local demographics, 1 to 6 percent of your residents have physical limitations that make it difficult for
them to handle large carts. Offer special assistance to residents who demonstrate a need.
-------
Dual Collection:
One Truck, Two Waste Streams
Imagine sending four trucks through a neighborhood each week to pick up MSW,
recyclables, yard-trimmings, and bulky items. Sound excessive? Multiple passes are
the reality for many communities where residents expect a variety of collection
services. Rather than maintain separate vehicle fleets, several local governments
turned to dual collection vehicles that allow for the collection of separated waste
streams in a single vehicle in a single pass.
How Does Dual Collection Work?
* " 0
Several manufacturers now produce dual collection vehicles. The vehicle designs vary to fit different col
lection program needs. Some examples of possible configurations include:
Split-Cart Systems
OJ
u
Split-cart systems utilize automated collection technology. Residents receive wheeled carts with dividers
to separate MSW and recyclables. The hopper and vehicle chamber on the collection truck are divided ^
LI—
the same way. Crews collect the carts using hydraulic lifting arms operated from the truck cab. As the «
carts tip into the vehicle hopper, MSW and recyclables flow into the separate compartments. Typically, in gf
a split-cart system, collection crews pick up yard-trimmings separately. _2
00
In some split-cart systems, residents mix all recyclables (i.e., paper, plastic, metal) together in the desig- u"
nated portion of the cart. Check with your local materials recovery facility to ensure you can deliver fully
commingled recyclables before considering this dual collection strategy. Many recovery facilities prefer
separate collection of paper and containers to reduce the potential for contamination. g
u
Front-Loader "One Pass" Systems =
u
Front-load collection vehicles, normally used for commercial dumpster collection, also might act as dual
collection trucks for residential routes. Crews bolt special split containers (modified open-top dumpsters)
on the front-load collection arms.
These containers might have compartments for MSW, yard waste, and/or recyclables. Residents set out
materials as usual, then collectors load the set-outs into the appropriate compartment. Periodically, crews
activate the lifting mechanism and the front-load container tips into the trucks hopper. A split hopper
directs the collected materials into separate chambers in the truck body.
As with split-cart systems, some front-load systems mix all recyclables together. This approach will not be effec-
tive for your community if your local materials recovery facility cannot process fully commingled recyclables.
-------
13
LO
c
0)
Customized Designs
Customized dual collection designs might be the answer if you do not have access to processing capacity
for mixed recyclables (i.e., paper, plastic, glass, and metal commingled together). Several manufacturers
offer combinations of traditional packer bodies and recyclables collection units mounted on a single chas-
sis. To achieve the proper compartment sizing, communities using these customized dual collection sys-
tems usually provide separate collection of yard-trimmings or require residents to use yard-trimming
drop-off centers.
What Are the Benefits?
The benefits of dual collection systems typically include:
• Reduced Vehicle and labor needs: Reducing the number of special vehicles needed to pro-
vide multiple collection services reduces total fleet and labor costs.
• Reduced environmental impacts: Fewer trucks mean lower fuel usage, fewer air emissions,
and reduced traffic and safety impacts on community streets.
• Increased diversion: Dual collection allows communities to add diversion programs while con-
trolling cost increases.
Will Dual Collection Work for Me?
Your community might be a good candidate for dual collection if you have:
OJ
'BO
OJ
~S • Low residential MSW eneration rates.
Low housing density.
High driver and/or crew wages.
• High mileage to get to processing or disposal locations.
o
• High participation rates in your recycling program.
U • Processing and disposal locations within 10 miles of each other.
Program planning is the key to success. Find out all you can about the types of dual collection vehicles
available and decide which will work best in your community. Some dual collection vehicles, for exam-
ple, require a large turning radius, which limits their use in areas with narrow roadways, dead-end
streets, and tight cul-de-sacs. Choosing an incompatible dual collection vehicle design limits your pro-
gram flexibility. Advanced planning and research helps alleviate costly equipment retrofits.
Remember, the current generation of dual collection vehicles are still relatively new. Vehicle vendors and
solid waste system planners continue to experiment with and improve alternatives for dual collection.
-------
Crew Productivity: Motivating Employees
Automated trucks and altered collection schedules only go so far in improving
collection efficiency. Efficient collection programs also need a motivated, produc-
tive work force. To increase worker productivity, many local governments imple-
ment special pay structures, offer better training programs, and reward
employees for safe work practices.
Why Change Management Approaches?
Many local governments utilize an incentive or "task pay" system for their waste collection crews. In this
type of system, each crew is assigned a specific route, with a fixed number of stops to service each day
They are paid for a full day's work, no matter how quickly or slowly they take to complete the route.
This gives workers an incentive to finish their routes as quickly as possible, while still ensuring that all
residences will be picked up in the course of the day.
While this type of system has many advantages for both the collection crews and the local government, it
can also create problems. Workers might place speed ahead of safety, causing injuries to themselves or
traffic accidents. Also, as waste generation patterns and neighborhood demographics change over time,
the routes may become unbalanced, with some becoming too long and others too short. These changes
become especially significant when a community increases waste diversion through recycling and/or
"Pay-As You Throw" fee structures (where households are charged on the basis of the amount of waste
they produce). It is often difficult to adjust work assignments to reflect these changes.
OJ
u
00
<_
£
CO
OJ
OJ
What Can I Do?
To overcome the challenges associated with incentive pay structures, some local governments eliminate
the incentive pay system altogether, redefine the "task" to be completed, or redesign routes so more work
is required from each crew.
If you change or eliminate incentive pay plans, you will need other strategies to motivate crews and
encourage high productivity. Some successful strategies include the following:
• Team initiatives! With proper team training, employees form teams that provide valuable
feedback to management, offer an effective means to communicate with front-line personnel, and pro-
vide increased employee buy-in with department policies and practices.
• Employee gain-Sharing programs: Local governments provide gain-sharing bonuses to indi-
vidual employees if the department meets or beats its budget goals.
U
c
-------
• Emphasis on employee wellness: Solid waste depart-
ments offer employee and family wellness incentives that encour-
age crews to participate in health fairs and other programs.
• Absenteeism and safety incentives: Communities
and haulers combat the problems of absenteeism and work-
related accidents by offering monetary and nonmonetary rewards for attendance and safe work practices.
• Vehicle and route Selection incentives: Communities base route and truck assignments
on driving safety records and crew productivity. The chance to get better assignments encourages
employees to operate vehicles safely and efficiently.
• Training initiatives: Communities across the country invest in employee training to improve
morale and performance. Offer supervisors the opportunity to take college-level courses to improve
leadership and management skills. Develop comprehensive training programs for all solid waste
collection crews.
5) What Are the Benefits?
Improving management practices and increasing communication and cooperation between labor and
$ management improves a wide range of public services. In fact, focusing on employee motivation can
accomplish the following:
• Improved WOrk/life quality: Help to increase excitement about work, improve problem-solving
abilities, and reduce injury potential.
• Reduced COStS: Help to decrease overtime and absenteeism, increase productivity, and allow
service improvements to be made with limited resources.
• Improved labor/management relations: Help to reduce grievances, develop fair and effec-
!y tive discipline, share gains, and develop labor agreements that more accurately reflect service needs.
14—
c • Improved Safety: Help to focus on injury and accident prevention, improve training and policies,
improve return-to-work rates, and reduce time-loss expenses.
~o
U
D
00
&0
OJ
U
c
-------
Contracting: Competition and
Collection Costs
Privatization increases the cost-effectiveness of many public pro-
grams. Faced with consumer demand for cheaper and better service, many
municipalities outsource the collection of solid waste and recyclables. When
privatizing, a well-designed and carefully managed contract is the key to getting
reasonable rates and high-quality service.
Why Engage in Competition?
Competition is one way to lower costs or improve service. Base your decision
to change your mode of service delivery through competition on a careful eval-
uation of your current program. In your evaluation, be sure to look at your
goals and objectives, level of customer satisfaction, cost of service, ability of
your current service provider(s) to meet existing and projected demands, and
quality of service delivery achieved.
What Are the Benefits?
Some of the benefits of competition typically include:
• Reduced COStS! Competition often reduces costs to customers. Rates have been known to drop as
much as 20 to 60 percent as a result of a competitive bidding process, especially if collection services
have not been bid out for a long time.
• Improved Service quality! Competition, and a carefully designed scope of services, ensures cus-
tomers get the best possible service. Some communities use a combination of public and private crews.
The competition between these service providers keeps all parties "on their toes."
• Increased Control Of Waste flow: The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that local governments can-
not pass ordinances directing MSW to particular facilities. Courts have, however, upheld the rights of
communities to enter into open competitive processes to select collection contractors and specify, as
part of those processes, that collected materials be taken to designated sites.
00
<_
£
CO
OJ
'BO
OJ
u
c
-------
Z5
00
BO
OJ
u
c
-------
Collection Change: Communicating
to Build Support
A new collection program is only as effective as its weakest component. For
many communities, that component is communication. Without a well-designed
strategy for communicating the benefits of changing a waste collection system,
many municipalities face resistance from their customers, colleagues, and collec-
tion managers. Inform residents and department staff of a planned change ahead
of time to help ensure a smooth transition to a new collection program.
What Should I Do?
How do you develop a successful consensus building effort? The particulars vary
from community to community—based on local needs and the availability of
resources—but the following key steps are universal:
Identify Your Target Audience
You must convince both internal and external audiences that the proposed collection system change is
beneficial. Internal audiences include decision-makers, department heads, crews and supervisors, and
customer service personnel. External audiences include customers, stakeholder groups, the media, peer
communities, and competitors.
Define Needs
To find out what the "average" citizen thinks about a proposed program change, consider some or all of
the following techniques: surveys, focus groups, pilot programs, citizen planning committees, and infor-
mal discussions with customers. Understanding resident fears and needs is critical to developing an effec-
tive outreach strategy. Citizen input is only part of the solution; staff creativity also plays a role.
Idea-sharing incentives motivate front-line crews to share their ideas for saving money or improving
service quality.
Communicate Program Change
Once you identify what your target audiences care about, develop an information campaign to respond to
those needs. For citizens, get the word out through direct mailings, utility bill notices, newspaper and
magazine articles, print and broadcast public service announcements, community meetings, and paid
advertising. No matter which media you choose, your message should focus on the needs and concerns
identified through your citizen involvement efforts.
U
u
00
OJ
'GO
OJ
u
0)
'u
O
~O
U
-------
OJ
'BO
U
i
c
O
O
U
Strategies at Work
In 1993, Charlotte, North Carolina, switched from
twice-per-week manual backyard collection to weekly
curbside collection with automated vehicles. To build
support for these changes, the city did the following:
• Used Charlotte's Neighborhood Coalition to get
input and feedback about changes to the collection
system.
• Conducted extensive meetings with front-line staff
to communicate the need for change, get staff input,
and provide training about "frequently asked
questions."
• Surveyed city residents to find out their priorities for
improving quality of life—residents identified crime
as the number one concern.
• Developed a public education message that focused
on the fact that collection system changes would
save the city enough money to implement new
community crime prevention programs.
• Used community meetings, newspaper articles,
newsletters, cable programming, radio talk shows,
and door-to-door distribution of educational materi-
als to get the word out.
• Anticipated increases in customer service demands
by installing a new database system to track incom-
ing requests and complaints.
• Trained 16 temporary personnel to supplement
existing customer service staff.
Deliver the Promised Services
One of the most meaningful ways to build support
for new service levels is to make sure program
operations live up to their public relations promis-
es. Make sure service delivery glitches are minimal
by phasing in new services to gain operational
experience.
Respond to Concerns
Customer care is important to local governments. A
wide variety of customer service software is available
to help monitor customer calls and track the out-
come of citizen complaints. Customer call volume
often increases 200 to 300 percent following a major
collection program modification. You might need to
add additional phone lines, train staff to respond to
calls, and implement strategies to address citizen
concerns. Remember, this disruption typically wanes
in 4 to 6 weeks.
Evaluate Your Program and Make
Changes as Needed
Local governments that successfully changed their
MSW or recyclables collection systems know the
value of concise, creative, and frequent informa-
tion exchange with internal and external stake-
holders. Even a well-conceived outreach program,
however, can fall short of its goals. If you try to
implement a change and encounter barriers, diag-
nose the problem and learn from the experience.
-------
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Why should I change my solid waste collection system if residents like it?
A: Customer satisfaction is one very important measure of collection system performance, but there are
other important criteria to consider, including efficiency and cost. Citizen response to change can be
positive or even improve after an initial adjustment period. In addition, many collection system
improvements are "invisible" to residents. Employee motivation programs, improved fleet mainte-
nance approaches, and new route management strategies are just a few examples of strategies that
yield positive results with little or no customer involvement.
Q: How will changing my solid waste collection system affect costs?
A: Costs depend on the type of change being considered. The city of Waco, Texas, for example, imple-
mented a fleet management quality circle program for less than $500, resulting in a savings of
approximately $100,000 in the first year alone. Some collection system improvements, such as
automation or dual collection, require higher up-front investments for new vehicles and containers.
These investments are more than justified by the increased productivity of the vehicles and
deceased labor costs. Fewer trucks mean less fleet capital costs and reduced operating and mainte-
nance costs.
Most jurisdictions will have different bottom-line results because most com-
munities have different accounting practices. Planning models help project
the impact of collection system modifications on the number of vehicles
needed, labor requirements, and direct operating costs.
Q. How can I ensure customers understand and support the
proposed change?
A: Building consensus for collection system modifications involves a four-step
process: 1) identify the fears, needs, and concerns of stakeholders; 2)
develop outreach materials that address those needs in a targeted
way; 3) deliver the promised service reliably; and 4) provide ongoing
customer service and support.
Most communities find the majority of complaints and questions (if
any) subside after the first 4 to 6 weeks of implementation. To get
through that startup period, anticipate increased call volumes and pre-
pare all local governmental staff for the questions that are likely to arise.
A user-friendly, computerized
collection worksheet that will
generate route requirements
for any given system is avail-
able from the Solid Waste
Association of North
America. Call 301 585-2898.
-------
It's Workin
D
00
OJ
'GO
OJ
u
c
g
'
~o
U
Elected officials and system users across the country are reaping the benefits of implementing new collec-
tion strategies.
Lower Costs to Rate-Payers
Hillsborough County Florida, used a competitive contracting process to select MSW and recyclables col-
lectors. As a result, rates dropped by almost 30 percent for the average resident. Charlotte, North
Carolina, switched from manual, backdoor MSW collection to curbside collection using automated col-
lection vehicles. Using specialized software to assist with routing, Charlotte was able to reduce the num-
ber of routes needed by more than 30 percent. As a result of these changes, the city saved over
$800,000 per year and achieved a 95 percent approval rating from customers.
More Satisfied Customers
Piano, Texas, switched from twice-per-week MSW collection to weekly service. A mail survey reported
92 percent resident satisfaction with the new collection program.
Improved Worker Safety and Morale
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, implemented labor and management strategies to improve communication
between union and management. The city initiated extensive training for front-line supervisors. As a
result, on-time performance improved by nearly 30 percent, crew overtime expenditures dropped, and
employee morale improved.
Increased Diversion
Visalia, California, switched from fully automated MSW collection to a dual collection system with weekly
MSW and recyclables collection. Visalia added the curbside collection of recyclables and yard-trimmings
for an incremental cost of less than 2 percent of its direct operating budget. As a result, the city achieved
a 25 percent diversion rate (excluding yard-trimmings).
Contracting and Competition
Palm Beach County, Florida, competitively bid collection contracts in 1993, after nearly 30 years of nego-
tiating agreements. The county achieved a 40 percent reduction in collection costs per household,
lowered annual fees paid by homeowners for the first time in 20 years, and controlled rate increases over
the course of the contract.
-------
Acknowlesements
The material in this booklet was drawn from a collection efficiency project directed by the Solid Waste
Association of North America (SWANA) and partially funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA). Through this project SWANA has developed a I-day collection efficiency workshop as
well as the following publications:
• Improved Routing Case Study - City of Charlotte, North Carolina, Part I. 1997 SWANA, 101 pp,
GR-C 0071 (Ordering number).
• Changes in Collection Frequency Case Study - City of Mesa, Arizona, Part 2. 1997 SWANA, 97 pp,
GR-C 0072.
• Semi-Automation Case Study - City of Rochester, New York, Part 3. 1997 SWANA, 76 pp, GR-C 0073.
• Dual Collection Case Study - City ofLoveland, Colorado, Part 4. 1997 SWANA, 72 pp, GR-C 0074.
• Getting More for Less: Cost-Cutting Strategies Case Study Set. 1997 SWANA, GR-C 0070.
• Getting More for Less: Collection Efficiency Workbook. 1997 SWANA, 115 pp, GR-C 0075.
• Getting More for Less: Automated Collection Worksheet. 1998, SWANA, GR-C 0075.
For information about SWANA's collection efficiency workshop or on obtaining any of these documents,
contact:
SWANA Technical Services
PO BOX 7219
Silver Spring, MD 20907-7219
Tel: 301 585-5898
Fax: 301 589-7068
E-Mail: technical@swana.ors
For More Information
ERA has also published a more detailed report on collection efficiency
entitled "Getting More for Less: Improving Collection Efficiency." To
obtain a free copy of this report or any of our other publications on
municipal solid waste, contact:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
RCRA Information Center (5305W)
401 M Street, SW
Washington, DC 20460
Tel: 800 424-9346 (TDD: 800 553-7672)
Fax: 703 603-9234
E-mail: rcra-docket@epa.gov
You can also find eectronic versions of our MSW publications as well as
additional information on our Web site: www.epa.gov/msw.
-------
' Printed on paper that contains at least 30 percer
------- |