&EPA
                            United States
                            Environmental Protection
                            Agency
                     Solid Waste and
                     Emergency Response
                     (5305)
            EPA530-N-95-003
            Spring 1995
REUSABLE
NEWS
Recycled

Paper

Revisited
    EPA has published a draft
    Paper Products Recovered
    Materials Advisory Notice
(RMAN) in the Federal Register
[60 FR 14182, March 15, 1995]
concerning  recycled  paper.
When  final, the  RMAN will
update EPAs 1988 Procurement
Guideline for Paper and Paper
Products Containing Recovered
         (Continued on page 10)

The Results Are In!
 In our Winter issue we announced a
 contest to revamp our masthead. Pre-
 sented with four variations of trash
cans, 88 readers voiced their votes. Sev-
enty percent of the votes were paperless!
The Ol' Standby  (fe atured  on the
newsletter since its inception) was th<
official winner.
  We were pleasantly surprised, how-
ever, to receive many other great ideas
about what to do with our masthead.
Many of these ideas focus on recycling
and waste prevention. We decided,
therefore, to keep the contest open by
requesting additional ideas for the
masthead, or even original artwork.
(Call 202  260-6548; send  email to
Leigh.John@EPAMAILEPA.GOV; or write
to the address on the back cover.)
  This issue's masthead is compliments
of reader Tim Schlender from Olympia,
Washington, and features his cat, Stevie.
Let the Green Games  Begin!
   Spectators at the 1996 Summer
   Olympic Games in Atlanta
   could find themselves using
readily available recycling bins and
pumping ketchup out of bulk dis-
pensers instead  of squeezing it
from individual packets. With the
help of EPA, the Atlanta Committee
for the Olympic Games is exploring
numerous ways to  incorporate
waste prevention and recycling
into every aspect of the 100th
Olympiad.

  The sheer size of the Olympics—
drawing millions of athletes  and
visitors from  around the globe—
creates enormous opportunities for
waste reduction. The eight major
            (Continued on page 5)
McDonald's "Buy  Recycled
Campaign  Tops  $1 Billion
    The McDonald's Corporation
    recently announced the pur-
    chase of its billionth dollar
worth of products made from recy-
cled materials. The company, which
began its buy-recycled campaign in
1990, now spends more than $300
million a year on recycled products.
In  1994 alone, the company pur-
chased 220,000  tons of packaging
made from recycled materials.
           (Continued on page 2)
                                       ~)Recycled/Recyclable Printed on paper that contains at least 20% postconsumer fiber.

-------
McDonald's  "Buy Recycled" Campaign  Tops $1  Billion (continued from Pagei)
   Waste
                                  EartV,  Eff«rt~
     In just three years, McDonald's has implemented nearly 100 ini-
     tiatives to prevent waste, recycle,  and buy recycled  in its 9,400
     restaurants across the United  States. Together, these  initiatives
   have eliminated 7,500 tons of packaging annually.
     The main thrust of McDonald's "Earth Effort" initiative is prevent-
   ing waste  in the first place—by making  materials substitutions,
   design alterations, and changes in buying practices. Over the  past
   year, McDonald's has saved $5  million by reducing waste in the fol-
   lowing ways:
   • Reducing the raised designs on napkins. This simple action enables
     23 percent  more napkins  to fit into a shipping  container, saving
     294,000 pounds of corrugated and 150 truckload  shipments.
   • Redesigning  shake and  sundae  shipment boxes to  achieve  a
     4-percent reduction in corrugated (450,000 pounds).
   • Decreasing the thickness of trash can liners to reduce plastic waste
     by 2.1 million pounds.
   • Converting  hash brown containers  from paperboard cartons  to
     paper bags to save 2.9 million pounds of packaging.
   • Redesigning french fry cartons to reduce the weight of paperboard
     packaging by 13 percent.
     McDonald's is also contributing to toxics reduction by printing some
   of its  packaging with soy-based inks, as well as using unbleached
   carryout bags and containers  for some of its burgers.
     In  Europe, McDonald's restaurants are experimenting with a new
   form of waste prevention—edible dishware. An ice cream container and
   lid made from cookie dough  have  been developed by McDonald's of
   Germany  to  replace a plastic container. McDonald's of Austria is
   using  breakfast  plates made from a maize base. The plates, which
   were tested during the 1994 Winter Olympics in Lillehammer, Nor-
   way, are fed to livestock  after  use. I
  McDonald's uses recycled prod-
ucts in the construction and oper-
ation  of  all its U.S. restaurants.
For example, plastic jugs  for
water,  milk, and juice are  made
into McDonald's food trays;  old
car parts become  steel frame
restaurant chairs;  and recycled
tires end up as surfaces on  the
company's    "Playland"   play-
grounds.  Used  consumer goods
(such  as  newspapers  and maga-
zines) get a second life  as carry-
out bags,  packaging, and napkins.

  In  addition  to  purchasing
recycled  products, McDonald's
recently joined "Buy Recycled and
Save." This  initiative is the latest
in a series  of nationwide, educa-
tional  recycling campaigns con-
ceived by   the Environmental
Defense  Fund  (EOF)  and  the
Advertising  Council,  and  sup-
ported by EPA. In  past years, the
campaign focused  on encouraging
Americans to collect materials for
recycling. To address the increas-
ing need  to build markets for recy-
clable  materials,   this   year's
campaign highlights the impor-
tance  of buying  recycled.

  For  its part, McDonald's will
help spread the  "buy-recycled"
message  on  recycled  paper  soft
drink  cups,  carryout  bags,  and
trayliners. The  trayliners teach
consumers  about  products that
typically  contain recycled materi-
als, such  as  cardboard egg cartons
and aluminum  beverage cans.
They  also instruct  individuals in
reading product labels  to  deter-
mine the  postconsumer content of
products  such as cereal boxes and
shampoo bottles.

  For a free copy of an educational
brochure  on buying recycled, write
to  McDonald's,  Department of
Environmental Affairs, Kroc Drive,
Oak Brook,  IL, 60521. For  more
information  on McDonald's  Buy
Recycled campaign,  call Becky
Caruso at 708 575-3678.

-------
                Reducing  Bottlenecks  in
                      Plastics Recycling
        When it comes to recycling plastic con-
        tainers, purity and  uniformity are
        crucial to a successful operation. In
the best of all possible recycling worlds, no
caps, labels, dirt, metal, or glue would be col-
lected with containers, and the plastic  types
and colors would be the same. Consequently,
plastics recycling would be more economical,
and the  value  and utility of scrap plastic
would increase significantly. In the real world,
however, recyclers  often have  to  sort and
process complex mixtures of plastic types, col-
ors, and foreign objects.

  In an attempt to improve the economics of
plastic recycling,  the  City/Industry Plastic
Redesign Project  was formed. The  project's
purpose is to encourage the redesign of plastic
containers to reduce the number of separation
steps needed before processing, making recy-
cling easier and  more cost-effective.  When
most  plastic  containers  were  originally
designed, manufacturers did not consider
recycling implications, since plastics recycling
had not yet begun. Now that plastics recycling
is a reality, appropriate improvements can be
made.

  EPA's Region  5  (serving  Illinois,  Indiana,
Michigan, Minnesota,  Ohio, and  Wisconsin),
EPA Headquarters, the Wisconsin Department
of Natural Resources, and the New  York
Department of Economic Development funded
the project. Participants  included city  recy-
cling officials from Dallas, Texas; Jacksonville,
Florida; Milwaukee, Wisconsin;  New  York,
New York; San Diego,  California;  and Seattle,
Washington, as well as industry representa-
tives from  Avery Dennison, Owens Illinois,
Johnson Controls, Procter & Gamble, S.C. John-
son Wax, St. Jude Polymers, and EnviroPlas-
tics. The project participants found that they
had a lot of common ground; their major pre-
liminary  recommendations included the fol-
lowing:

   ICaps, closures, and spouts on high-density
   polyethylene (HOPE)  bottles should be
compatible with the type of plastic from which
the bottle is made.
 ^Colored caps should not be used on uncol-
^•ored HOPE bottles (for example, red caps
on clear milk jugs).

3   Aluminum caps should not be used  on
   plastic bottles.

4Consumers should be able to completely
   remove aluminum seals.

5   Label glues  should dissolve  in water.
   Water-soluble glues  allow paper labels to
float to the top, where they can be removed.

6   HOPE base cups should be phased out on
   polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles.

 WA11 layers in multilayered plastic  contain-
 m ers should be compatible with each other.

8Manufacturers  of processing equipment
   should pursue the development of a low-
volume, low-cost,  automated  sorting system
for detecting polyvinyl chloride (PVC) for use
in a materials recovery facility.

  An area of debate among the participants
involved the use of PVC in certain containers.
City recycling  officials recommended that
when a container can be made from more than
one type of plastic, PVC should not be used.
(For example, a  clear plastic bottle that con-
tains salad oil or window washing fluid might
be made of either PET or PVC.)

  All the project participants agreed that the
key to success in increasing the efficiency of
plastics recycling is getting the word out on
their  recommendations. Once they  finalize
their  recommendations, the next  step is to
reach  industry  trade associations,  product
manufacturers, packaging designers, recycling
officials, and others. They will accomplish this
by presenting the recommendations at confer-
ences,  distributing a report that summarizes
the recommendations, making followup phone
calls to key decision-makers, and developing a
press release. H
   For more information, contact Susan Mooney of EPA Region 5 at 312 886-3585. Technical
   questions can be directed to Peter Anderson of Recycle Worlds Consulting at 608 231-1100.

-------
Green  Packaging
Award Is  in the  Bag
   The latest and greenest idea in
   flexible packaging is the pow-
   der laundry detergent refill
bag. Designed by Paramount Pack-
aging Company for Procter & Gam-
ble, the plastic bag is the 1994
winner of the third annual Green
Globe Award. The Flexible Pack-
aging Association (FPA) awards the
Green Globe to one environmen-
tally conscious product  design
each year to showcase  source
reduction, pollution prevention,
and resource conservation efforts
in flexible packaging.
  "This year's  award-winning
package significantly  reduces
waste,   incorporates  postcon-
sumer  recycled content,  and
stacks nicely on store shelves,"
said Glenn E. Braswell, president
of FPA. The bag, which holds 9.5
pounds of detergent, is designed
to refill large, "family-size" paper-
board detergent boxes. Each bag
contains 25 percent postconsumer
plastic, and uses 80 percent less
material than comparably sized
detergent boxes.

  FPA has been giving awards for
innovative and quality flexible
packaging since  1956, and the
Green Globe Award since 1992.
For  more information, contact
Marjorie Valin of FPA at 202 842-
3880.1
        source
FPA

Conceives

Source

Reduction

Logo

 It's  hard to depict  some-
 thing that doesn't exist. But
 in unveiling its new logo to
promote "source reduction,"
the Flexible Packaging Asso-
ciation  (FPA) has done just
that.
  Source  reduction can be
defined as the design, manu-
facture, purchase, or use of
materials or products (includ-
ing packages) to reduce their
amount or toxicity before
they enter the municipal
solid waste stream. Unlike
recycling,  source reduction
has not had the benefit of a
universally accepted graphic
symbol (like the  "chasing
arrows") to help communi-
cate this crucial concept.
  FPAs logo (pictured below)
took about a year to develop.
It features a diminishing dot
pattern and the tagline, "Less
waste in the first place." Any
individual or group can use
FPAs tagline, as long as  it
agrees in writing to use the
tagline  in an educational,
informational, or nonspecific
promotional manner. Only
FPA  members can use the
logo. For more information,
contact Marjorie Valin at the
Flexible Packaging Associa-
tion at 202 842-3880.
                reduction
                 less waste in fas first place!

-------
Re-Refined  Oil
Purchases
Revitalized
   Federal agencies can now use re-
   refined engine oil in passenger
   vehicles and  light-duty trucks,
according to a recent policy direc-
tive issued by the General  Services
Administration (GSA). In the past,
many purchasing agents had been
reluctant to  use  re-refined  oil
because of concerns that automotive
warranties would be voided if the
oil was used.

  The warranty concern was one of
several issues discussed at a "sum-
mit meeting" held in December 1994
and sponsored by GSA and the Fed-
eral Environmental Executive.  The
meeting  brought together govern-
ment   fleet   managers,
automotive and petroleum
industry representatives, and
used oil re-refiners to discuss barri-
ers and opportunities for increased
use of re-refined oil by federal agen-
cies.  At the meeting, car manufac-
turers indicated  that automobile
warranties would be honored as
long as the re-refined oil carries the
"starburst" seal of approval granted
by the American Petroleum Institute
(API).  Several brands have already
received API certification.

  This timely breakthrough clears
the way for federal agencies to reap
the benefits of using re-refined oil. It
              also facilitates com-
             pliance with a  re-
          quirement of Executive
Order 12873 on Federal Acquisition,
Recycling, and Waste Prevention;
speeds  up  implementation  of
EPAs procurement  guideline  on
re-refined  oil; and encourages
markets for this  valuable, non-
renewable,  recovered resource.

  For more information about re-
refined  lubricating  oil, or for a
copy of EPAs Procurement Guide-
line for Lubricating  Oils Contain-
ing Re-Refined Oil, contact  the
RCRA Hotline at 800 424-9346.1
Green Games
(Continued from page 1)

types of activities that EPA and the
Committee are targeting for waste
reduction are (1) food and beverage
services,  (2)  merchandising,  (3)
logistics,  including maintenance,
cleaning,  and  inventory,  (4)  ser-
vices for  athletes and other resi-
dents of the Olympic Village, (5)
community relations,  (6)  spectator
services, (7)  construction, and (8)
the "look" of the Games, such as the
development of banners and other
Olympic displays.
  EPA  has made  hundreds of spe-
cific suggestions for reducing waste
at the Games, including:
• Composting food scraps from
  concessions and kitchens.
• Requiring vendors  to minimize
  the use of transportation packag-
  ing in shipments of Olympic pro-
  motional products.
• Requiring  vendors to use food
  service products, such as dishes
  and  napkins,   that  are  com-
  postable.
• Using souvenir cups  that can be
  refilled during the Games.

  EPA presented its waste preven-
tion  opportunities report  to the
Committee in March. The sugges-
tions chosen by the Committee will
be integrated with its existing waste
reduction  efforts.  Currently, the
Committee has a goal of recycling
or reclaiming 85 to 90 percent of
the  solid waste produced  at the
Games. The Committee has devel-
oped its own plans to meet this
goal, such as using asphalt from the
demolition of the Atlanta  Fulton
County Stadium as fill  in the con-
struction of parking lots  after the
Games and disassembling one run-
ning track after the Games for dona-
tion to local colleges.

  Atlanta's efforts are following a
growing trend toward environmen-
tal awareness at recent Olympics.
The  1994 Winter Games in  Lille-
hammer,  Norway,  were  widely
commended for their environmen-
tal initiatives, including the use of
meal plates made from maize that
were fed to livestock after use.
  According to Betty Grant, pro-
gram manager for community rela-
tions  and   coordinator  of  the
organizing  committee's  environ-
mental initiatives,  "the Committee
has made a  commitment to stage
the best Games in modern history.
We could not keep that commit-
ment without being sensitive and
responsible   to   environmental
issues. We have been  very  fortu-
nate to have EPA working with us
to guide  our planning and deci-
sions on  environmental  initia-
tives."
  For more information  on  the
Atlanta  Olympic   Games  waste
reduction  project,  contact  Mary
Felton of EPA at 703 308-7260.

-------
      FOCUS      ON      HOUSEHOL
 HHW  Programs  Keep  Residents
 From  Throwing  It  All  Away
       The number of
       household
       hazardous waste
 (HHW) programs in the
 United States has
 grown rapidly from
just one in 1980 to
 nearly 5,000 today.
 These programs
 provide education,
 collection, reuse, and
 recycling services  for
 communities to
 manage their HHW.
  HHW is what  some common
 household products become once
 they are disposed of, and can
 include such items as drain and
 oven  cleaners, motor oil, paint
 thinners, and pesticides. The aver-
 age  household  generates more
 than 20 pounds of HHW per year.
  HHW collection  programs vary
 in terms of frequency, structure,
 operating budget, and emphasis.
 Programs range from ongoing col-
 lection to one-day events. Some
 programs collect waste from small
 businesses as well as residents.
 All focus on educating residents
 about  alternatives  and  reuse.
 However diverse these programs
 can be, they  all share a common
 goal:  to  divert  HHW from the
 municipal solid waste stream.
  HHW programs in Washington,
 California, and Vermont provide
 examples of the types of activities
 communities  can  conduct  to
 achieve HHW management goals.
 The city of Bellingham, Washing-
ton, is saving money on disposal
costs and helping the community
by providing a facility for resi-
dents  to trade and reuse their
HHW. In Santa Monica,  Califor-
nia, the Environmental Programs
Division's goal was to reduce tox-
ics use by the city in both the
community and  its own offices.
Vermont is educating consumers
about toxics reduction as part of a
Shelf Labeling Law.

Bellingham's
Swap Shop
     Have some extra paint? Drop it
     off. Need some household
     cleaner?  Pick it up. That's
how the reuse  or "swap" program
in Bellingham, Washington, works.
  Bellingham's swap program has
been serving approximately 145,000
residents in Washington's Whatcom
County for over six years. The pro-
gram is an offshoot
of Bellingham's suc-
cessful  collection
program.  Reusable
products  collected
                               for the staff, supplies, the reuse pro-
                               gram, and HHW disposal.
                                 Panny uses a number of mea-
                               sures to save money. The program
                               operates out of a modest facility
                               and uses city staff, rather than con-
                               tractors, to do the bulk of the work.
                               According to Panny, if a commu-
                               nity has an existing staff taking care
                               of HHW collection and disposal, "a
                               reuse program will save you money
                               if you do it right."
                                 To  do it right, programs  should
                               ensure the safety of  all products
                               offered for reuse and avoid liability.
                               Panny and her staff carefully evalu-
                               ate each product considered for
                               reuse. This  means checking the
                               condition and age of each product
                               and package. ("No leaks, holes, or
                               chunks"   are  acceptable,  says
                               Panny.) Also, the product label
                               (where  instructions  on how  to
                               properly use the product are listed)
                                          must be  intact.  In
                                          addition,
                                  no  sus-
 . . if a community has an pended or canceled,
existing staff taking care pesticides  are put
 of HHW collection and  on ^e reuse shelf
                         nor are anv inher-
through  the  HHW disposal, "a reuse program
                          you money if you
                                           tion,
                                                     gerous
to  residents at no                           products.  In addi-
charge. And  resi-                           tion.   like  manY
dents   are  taking                           communities  that
advantage of the swap shop. Over
1,100 individuals visited the facility
in 1994.
  Because every reused product is
one less item the city has to pay to
dispose of as hazardous waste, oper-
ating  a  reuse program actually
reduces program costs. The program
operates with one of the lowest bud-
gets in the country, according to its
coordinator, Alice Panny, of the
Bellingham Department of Public
Works. An  operating  budget  of
approximately $78,000 a year pays
                               offer reuse  programs,  Bellingham
                               asks people to sign a disclaimer of
                               responsibility for any injuries that
                               might result from the improper use
                               of items they pick up from the
                               shelves.
                                 With some of the money it has
                               saved,  the program will move into
                               a larger, yet still modest, facility
                               next year.
                                 For  more  information,  contact
                               Alice  Panny  of the  Bellingham
                               Department of Public Works, Solid
                               Waste Division, at 360 676-6850.

-------
D      HAZARDOUS      WASTE
    Santa Monica:
    Practicing What It
    Preaches
         City custodians in Santa Mon-
         ica  probably never  thought
         they would don lab coats. But
    for over a year now, these individ-
    uals have been the key technicians
    in an "experiment" involving the
    use  of alternative cleaning  prod-
    ucts.
       In July of 1993, as  part  of its
    ongoing  efforts  to reduce toxics
    use  in the community, the city of
    Santa Monica decided to turn its
    attention to  its  own government
    buildings.   During  a   10-month
    pilot  study,  custodians  tested
    alternative polishes; waxes; and
    furniture, glass,  carpet, and other
    cleaners. The purpose of the pilot
    was to minimize workplace  expo-
    sure to potentially toxic chemicals
    and to develop criteria for buying
    cleaning products in the future.
       For the  study,  city  officials
    selected  several  alternative com-
    mercial  cleaning products with
    a  proven track  record  in  com-
    mercial applications and environ-
    mental and health safety. Custodi-
    ans  throughout the city tested the
    products in their buildings. At the
    conclusion of the study, the custo-
    dians determined that the alterna-
    tive products performed as well or
    better than  traditional  cleaning
                Santa  Monica
                      Goes to
                            Hollywood
       ost  local
       governments
       that set  out to
produce an educational film
for the community don't wind up with an
Emmy Award nomination. But the City of Santa Mon-
ica did just  that with  its film about household hazardous waste
(HHW) entitled "When We Throw It Away...Is It Really Away?"

  Made originally for local television, the 30-minute film discusses the
issues associated with managing HHW. In particular, it discusses the finan-
cial costs incurred  by the city to dispose of HHW. "Many cities spend a lot
of money on HHW," states Brian Johnson,  the environmental programs
coordinator  for the City of Santa Monica and co-producer of the film.
"We all  need to come to terms with why we are doing  this." The film
suggests several alternatives to disposing of HHW, including reusing
leftover products and using less-toxic alternatives.

  Since the  film garnered so much attention in Hollywood, the
city decided  to expand the film and share it with the nation. A
new, one-hour version of the film provides a more compre-
hensive look at HHW management nationwide, and even
presents some international perspectives on the issue.

  The film  is now being marketed to public television
stations across the country.

  For more information on Santa Monica's toxics reduction
program or the HHW film, contact Brian Johnson or Debbie i
Raphael with the  City of Santa Monica Environmental
Programs Division at  310 458-8228 and 310 458-2255, [
respectively,  or at 310 393-9975.1
                                       products. Not only did the prod-
                                       ucts  clean well,  but the city also
                                       reduced its  purchasing costs  by
                                       four percent.
                                         The enthusiasm of the custodial
                                       staff was critical to the pilot's success.
                                       The  study was more  complicated
                                       than simply  switching  products,
                                       according to Debbie Raphael of the
                                       Santa Monica Environmental Di-
                                       vision.  "If you don't have the sup-
                                       port  of the custodians, the project
                                will fail." Initially, the custodians
                                did not believe that the alternative
                                supplies would perform favorably,
                                but their response changed once
                                they actually tested the products.
                                   At the conclusion of the pilot,
                                city officials developed purchas-
                                ing criteria for a new line of clean-
                                ing   products.   Santa   Monica
                                elicited the help of the Washing-
                                ton  Toxics  Coalition and Green
                                               (Continued on page 8)

-------
Focus on HHW: Santa Monica
(Continued from page 7)
Seal, two organizations dedicated
to toxics reduction,  to  draft the
criteria. The city then  bid  on a
number of product lines using the
newly  developed  criteria and
evaluated  the  products  based  on
environmental and human health
considerations and cost, as well as
the custodians' ratings of product
performance.  The city  has just
  Battery
  Manufacturers
  Charge
  Ahead
  Ti
•    hanks to many major U.S.
    battery manufacturers, most
    consumer batteries no
longer contain high levels
of mercury. The industry
has been steadily
decreasing the mercury
content  in "dry-cell" bat-
teries (such as AAA, AA, C, D,
9-volt, and alkaline vari-
eties) since 1984. Now,
many of these batteries
have been reformulated
and are  99.975 percent
mercury free, according to
the industry.
  The next challenge for the
industry is to improve the
efficiency of recycling
technologies for recover-
ing valuable metals
contained in dead
batteries. Recovered
metals can be used
again as raw materials
in industrial manufacturing,
such as  in the steel industry. Bat-
tery  manufacturers in the United
States are working with European
and  Japanese companies on this
effort, and one company estimates
that  improved technologies will be
available by the year 2000.
                                begun to purchase the new prod-
                                ucts for permanent use.

                                Vermont Consumers
                                are Label Conscious
                                Wi
         alk into almost any retail
         store in  Vermont,  and
         you're  likely to  find
clerks  doing more than  simply
stocking  goods.  They'll also be
taping  yellow labels onto shelves
displaying certain kinds of house-
hold products that contain haz-
ardous constituents.
  The  shelf labels are  required by
a Vermont law that applies to all
 retailers in  the state (including
 hardware stores,  general stores,
  and gas stations). Under the  law,
  retailers also must provide edu-
   cational  pamphlets to  con-
   sumers at the time of purchase.
  Together,  the  brochures  and
 labels are designed to teach peo-
  ple about the products they buy.
   The brochures provide addi-
     tional information about the
       availability  of   alternative
       products.  The  program  is
        patterned  after a  similar
        one in  Iowa,  which  was
       the first state in the nation
to pass a shelf labeling law.
  To make consumers  aware of the
label program, the  Vermont Agency
of Natural Resources  (the  Agency
tasked  with  running the program)
      conducts numerous outreach
       activities,   ranging  from
       newspaper  advertisements
       to radio broadcasts. To assess
      the effectiveness  of its efforts,
     the agency conducts periodic
     surveys.  According to its most
recent  outreach  campaign  and
followup survey, the agency's efforts
have been successful. In 1994, while
46 percent of respondents indi-
cated they had seen, heard, or read
information  about the program
before  the outreach campaign, 58
percent  of  survey participants
                                       These products contain
                                 HAZARDOUS INGREDIENTS
could recall  being  aware of the
information after the  campaign.
This awareness shows  a  12-point
increase in awareness due to the
campaign. It also shows a  19-point
increase in the level of awareness
since 1992, based on a similar sur-
vey, when the  only outreach
efforts  were  through pamphlets
and posters.
  Outreach efforts  seem to  be
affecting the  number  of people
noticing the shelf labels  as well.
Before  the 1994 outreach cam-
paign,  25 percent of the survey
participants recalled  seeing  the
shelf labels. After the  campaign,
38 percent of survey participants
recalled seeing them—a  13-point
increase.  In  addition, in  1994,
nearly  58 percent of people who
were aware  of  the shelf labels
claimed to be buying fewer prod-
ucts containing hazardous  con-
stituents.   These   results   are
considered "statistically signifi-
cant, " according to the Agency. In
fact, the Agency believes  that the
1994 survey  "shows some real
gains in  consumer awareness,"
according to  John Miller, in the
Agency's Department of Environ-
mental Conservation.
  For  more information on  the
program, call John  Miller at the
Vermont   Agency   of  Natural
Resources at 802 241-3444.1

-------
DID  YOU

KNOW?
  t's now easier than
  ever to recycle used
 I toner cartridges from
your laser printer. While
hundreds of indepen-
dent recyclers nation-
wide accept used toner
cartridges, you now can
mail them free of charge
to meet their maker. Can-
non, Hewlett-Packard, Apple,
and Digital  Equipment Corpora-
tion will pick up the postage on
used cartridges  manufactured
specifically for their printers if
shipped via UPS or Mailboxes,
Etc.
    For more information,
call Cannon at 800 962-2708,
Hewlett-Packard at 800 527-
3753, or Apple at 800 776-2333
                     Reusable News Online —
                     New and Improved!
                         Thanks to recent advances in computer
                         software, graphic versions of Reusable
                         News are now available online! Unlike
                     the text-only versions that EPA has been
                     posting  on  the Internet since  last spring,
                     these  issues  include all  the  newsletter's
                     graphics—the  photos,  illustrations,  and
                     page  designs—that  add context,  convey
                     related information, and are often just plain
                     fun.
                       The files are created using Adobe Acrobat
                     software and can be found on the EPA Public
                     Access Server. While  a  special reader is
                     needed to view the files, an Acrobat Reader
                     v.  2.0 is available free of charge in many
                     locations on the Internet. EPA also has made
                     a copy available on its Public Access Server.
                     So next time you're checking  out EPA's
                     Internet offerings,  look for the new  online
                     graphic  versions of Reusable  News—and
                     treat yourself to the latest in paperless infor-
                     mation! The address  is gopher.epa.gov
                     under EPA  Offices and Regions, Office of
                     Solid  Waste.
Finding Hidden  Source Reduction  Numbers
     You've started using ceramic
     mugs instead of disposable
     cups, made arrangements to
return snipping crates for reuse,
and duplex copy nearly all docu-
ments. You've forged ahead  with
source reduction, and now won-
der how to measure the  dollars
you've saved and the waste you've
reduced.
  You are  not alone. Measuring
source  reduction results can  be
challenging for both  communities
and  organizations.  Communities
can find it difficult to  get  good
baseline data on waste generation
in the first place. Distinguishing
between residential and commer-
cial waste generation also can  be
challenging. For organizations, it
can be hard to tell  if the waste
reductions they are achieving are
truly  due  to  source  reduction
activities or some other variable,
such as changes  in the scope or
scale of operations.
  To begin tackling these issues,
EPA joined forces with the Center
for Policy Alternatives, an organi-
zation  dedicated to   promoting
progressive policies  at the  state
level. For two days last December,
the two groups convened a Source
Reduction Measurement Round-
table. Approximately 25 technical
experts, academics, industry rep-
resentatives, and government offi-
cials attended the roundtable to
strategize  methods   for  source
reduction  measurement nation-
wide.
  By  defining source reduction
practices, identifying barriers and
opportunities  to source reduction
measurement,  and   evaluating
effective  ways  already used  to
measure source reduction, partici-
pants developed  a number  of
short- and  long-term actions  to
encourage source reduction mea-
surement in communities  and in
industry. Among these, the group
identified two critical needs:
• Standardizing data, definitions,
  and methods for collection and
  reporting information.
• Developing baseline waste  gen-
  eration data and relating them to
  economics and the population
  at the  national, state, and local
  levels.
  To this end, EPA is initiating
several source reduction measure-
ment pilot projects.
  For copies of the final proceed-
ings  from this Roundtable,  call
Elizabeth Kelly at the Center for
Policy Alternatives  at 202  387-
6030.1

-------
Revised Standards for Recycled  Paper Proposed
(Continued from page 1)
Materials by  recommending new
recovered materials content levels
for  paper purchased by  federal
agencies, their grantees,  and con-
tractors. EPA also expects the new
guidance to be widely used by pri-
vate sector purchasers.
  The revised recycled content lev-
els are intended to increase the use
of recycled paper products made
from recovered  paper, as well as
increase the collection of discarded
paper from offices and homes. EPA's
new, two-tiered recommendations
are  expressed as percentages  of
total recovered and postconsumer
fiber. In  most cases,   EPA  is
proposing a  range  of recovered
fiber content for each paper item.
Based on levels currently used in
recycled  paper  products,  the
ranges  are  also   intended  to
encourage manufacturers  to  use
the  maximum amount of postcon-
sumer and other  recovered fiber
without compromising  competi-
tion or product performance and
availability.  This  is the same
approach that EPA  used in the
RMAN  for  the Comprehensive
Procurement  Guideline   (CPG)
published in 1994. Federal agen-
cies  are  responsible  for  actually
buying products that meet their
needs based on what is available
to them within the ranges recom-
mended by EPA.
  Executive Order 12873 on Fed-
eral  Acquisition,  Recycling, and
Waste Prevention, issued by Presi-
dent  Clinton  in  October  1993,
established the RMAN as a mech-
anism  to  update  EPA's procure-
ment guidelines. The draft Paper
Products RMAN  incorporates  the
recycled content requirements for
printing and writing  papers men-
tioned in  Section  504  of  the
Executive Order. EPA is also rec-
ommending new standards for tis-
sue  products, corrugated, and
paperboard, and is adding several
new  items. The RMAN covers over
50   different  paper   items—
virtually  every type of paper pur-
chased by government agencies
(see box below).
  In addition to recommending
content levels, the  RMAN dis-
cusses several  issues  that have
surfaced since the paper procure-
ment guideline was implemented.
For example,  it discusses  the
method of calculating recycled
content and clarifies the types of
paper waste  generated by  paper
mills that can count toward recy-
cled content.  In the RMAN, EPA
also suggests that agencies consider
how the  papers they purchase
affect  the type and amount of paper
waste they generate.

  EPA received public comments
on  the RMAN  after  it was pub-
lished in the  Federal Register.
The RMAN is  available  through
the EPA Public Access Server on
the Internet  at gopher.epa.gov.
For a paper copy of the  Federal
Register  notice as  well as  the
Draft Paper Products RMAN Sup-
porting Analyses,  contact  the
RCRA Hotline at 800 424-9346, or
in the Washington, DC, metropol-
itan area, 703 412-9810. For tech-
nical information about the Paper
Products  RMAN contact  Dana
Arnold of EPA at 703 308-7279.
 Items Included  in the Draft Recycled Paper RMAN
          Reprographic (copier paper)
          Offset
          Tablet
          Forms Bond (computer printout)
          Envelopes
          Cotton Fiber Paper
          Text and Cover
          Supercalendered (groundwood printing
          paper)
          Check Safety Paper
          Coated Printing Paper
          Carbonless
          File Folders
            Dyed Filing Products
             Pressboard Report Covers
                 Cards
                 Tags and Tickets
                 Newsprint
                 Bathroom Tissue
                 Paper Towels
                 Paper Napkins
                 Facial Tissue
                 Industrial Wipers
                 Corrugated Containers
                 Solid Fiber Boxes
                 Folding Cartons
                 Industrial Paperboard
                 Miscellaneous Paperboard
                 Carrierboard
                 Brown Papers (wrapping paper and bags)
 10

-------
Tackling  the
Tradeoffs
Two Resources on Life-Cycle Analysis
        Which is the most envir-
        onmentally  preferable—
        plastic  or paper bags?
Asking  a question  like this is
somewhat  akin   to   inquiring,
"Which came first, the chicken or
the egg?" In other words, there is
no easy answer.

  To begin answering such a ques-
tion, one would need to  evaluate
the environmental impacts associ-
ated with each  product  over  its
entire "life  cycle."  (The life cycle
of a product encompasses  every
step in its manufacture, use,  and
ultimate disposal, including extrac-
tion of raw  materials.) Throughout
the life cycle of a product or pack-
age, raw materials,  energy,  and
water are all expended. In  addi-
tion, emissions  can be released to
the air, water, and land—both dur-
ing the manufacture  of a product
and once it  is  disposed of.  To
assess and weigh all of these vari-
ables, experts  conduct  Life-Cycle
Analyses (LCA).
             The
          life cycle
        of a product
       encompasses
       every step  in
     its manufacture,
          use, and
          ultimate
          disposal.
  In recent years, there have been
many approaches  to  conducting
LCAs. To help LCA practitioners
improve  and   standardize   their
approach, EPA recently published two
documents:
• Life-Cycle Assessment:  Public
  Data Sources for the LCA Practi-
  tioner (NTIS document number
  PB95-191 227)  provides  brief
  descriptions  of publicly  avail-
  able electronic databases that
  could  be helpful  in  conduct-
  ing LCAs. The databases  con-
  tain nonproprietary information
  about  products and  processes,
  including energy required, raw
  materials  used,  and emissions
  released. This document should
  be  especially  useful to  practi-
  tioners new  to LCA  and those
  that cannot  access  proprietary
  industry  databases.  Cost  infor-
  mation on the use of these data-
  bases  is  provided  in  the
  document.
• Guidelines  for Assessing  the
  Quality of Life-Cycle Inventory
  Data (NTIS  document number
  PB95-191 235) provides a sug-
  gested framework to help LCA
  practitioners obtain better data
  and standardize their method-
  ologies, assumptions, and doc-
  umentation  of data.
  These  documents are available
  from the National Technical Infor-
  mation Service (NTIS) at the U.S.
  Department of Commerce,  5285
  Port Royal Road, Springfield, Vir-
  gin ia 22161. You can also obtain
  these documents by calling 800
  553-6847 or 703 487-4650, or  by
  faxing your request to 703 321-
  8547.1
Charter Endorsers
Lead the Way
  Hwenty-three Charter Endorsers have
    signed on to support WasteWi$e.
    Endorsers are trade  associations
and other membership-based organiza-
tions that carry the waste prevention,
recycling,  and  buy-recycled torch,
and encourage their members to
become WasteWi$e partners. The
Charter Endorsers are:
•  American Iron and Steel Institute
•  American Textile Manufacturers
  Institute
•  The  Business and Institutional
  Furniture Manufacturer's
  Association
•  Direct Marketing Association, Inc.
•  Edison Electric Institute
•  Electronic Industries Association
•  Food Marketing Institute
•  Foodservice & Packaging Institute
•  The  Glass Packaging Institute
•  Grocery Manufacturers of America
•  Institute of Packaging
  Professionals
•  National Association for
  Environmental Management
•  National Association of
  Photographic Manufacturers, Inc.
•  National Automobile Dealers
  Association
•  National Retail Federation
•  National Soft Drink Association
•  National Wooden Pallet and
  Container Association
•  Newspaper Association of America
•  Polystyrene Packaging Council
•  Steel Manufacturers Association
•  Steel Recycling Institute
•  The  Vinyl Institute
•  Virginia Recycling Association
            (Continued on page 12)

                            11

-------
 Source

 the  Airwaves

A       series of TV public  service
       announcements  (PSAs)  on
       waste   prevention   has
 already reached more  than triple
 the originally targeted  audience.
 Halfway through the campaign, the
 PSAs, which began airing  nation-
 wide  in January,  had made more
 than 650 million audience impres-
 sions  (the number of times viewers
 see the spots). The original goal
 was to make 200  million impres-
 sions over a six-month period.
     These quick-paced,  humorous
 PSAs, which  challenge citizens to
       PSAs Hit
"Reuse stuff today....Reduce garbage
tomorrow," were  created by  the
National Audubon Society with
funding and assistance from EPA.
  In addition to the TV PSAs, radio
ads have also been aired on more
than 23,000  stations  nationwide,
(approximately 92  million audience
impressions).   Print ads  also have
been sent out to  the nation's  top
1,000 newspapers.
     For more  information on  the
PSAs, contact Adaora Lathan at the
National Audubon Society at 202
547-9009.
                        Artie Olson used
                        the same cloth
                        shopping bag
                        524 consecutive
                        times. Until a
                        stampede for
                        half-price
                        papayas ended
                        his streak.
            AN
     YOLJTHIIi
By not using
paper bags,
Mr. Olson
eliminated
more than
100 pounds
of garbage.
                                       fc&tc Jdrtip
                                          T«OM :-!•»'.•'
                                             r
                                       \| Ml lU^^fcfDft
                                                     «. .
Charter  Endorsers

Lead the Way
(Continued from page 11)

  Many  of  these Endorsers are
encouraging  their members to join
WasteWi$e through direct mailings
or articles   in  their association
newsletters.  Some Endorsers have
asked EPA, or one  of their member
companies,  to   speak   about
WasteWi$e at upcoming association
meetings.
  Other  Endorsers are integrating
WasteWi$e outreach efforts with
their existing environmental initia-
tives. For example,  the American
Textile  Manufacturers Institute will
recommend  that  companies join
WasteWi$e to fulfill a requirement in
its "Encouraging  Environmental
Excellence Program," which requires
members to  participate in voluntary
programs.
  EPA   thanks  all  WasteWi$e
Endorsers for their support in shar-
ing the waste reduction message.fi
  Selected frames from a joint Audubon/EPA public service announcement on waste
  prevention airing nationwide.
                                     Address comments or free subscription
                                     requests to:
                                     John Leigh, Editor (5305)
                                     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                     401 M Street, SW.
                                     Washington, DC 20460

                                     The mention of publications, products,
                                     or organizations in this newsletter does
                                     not constitute endorsement or approval
                                     for use  by  the U.S. Environmental
                                     Protection Agency.
&EPA
   United States
   Environmental Protection Agency
   (5305)
   Washington, DC 20460

   Official Business
   Penalty for Private Use
   $300

-------