FINAL
BEST DEMONSTRATED AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY (BDAT)
-v.
BACKGROUND DOCUMENT FOR
UNIVERSAL STANDARDS
VOLUME A;
UNIVERSAL STANDARDS FOR
NONWASTEWATER FORMS OF LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTES
Richard Kinch
Chief, Waste Treatment Branch-
Lisa Jones
Project Manager
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
. Office of Solid Waste
2800 Crystal Drivs
Arlington, Virginia 22202
July 1994
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nij
-------
DISCLAIMER STATEMENT
The technical and analytical findings and recommendations contained in this document
are those of the author(s) and should not be construed as an official EPA position,
policy, or decision. This disclaimer page may only be removed by EPA.
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . ES.1
1.0 INTRODUCnON '. . .' lml
1.1 Regulatory Background 1-2
1.2 Description of Universal Standards 1-4
1.3 Contents of This Document ] 1_4
2.0 APPLICABILITY OF UNIVERSAL STANDARDS 2-1
2.1 Description of Universal Standards ; 2-1
2.2 Waste Codes Excluded from Universal Standards '.'.'. 2-2
2.3 Advantages of Universal Standards . 2-2
3.0 CONSTITUENTS SELECTED FOR REGULATION
UNDER UNIVERSAL STANDARDS 3.1
3.1 Constituents Considered for Regulation * 3-1
3.1.1 Organic Constituents 3.1
3.1.2 Metal Constituents 3-5
3.2 Selection of Regulated Constituents 3.5
3.2.1 Selection of Organic Constituents for
Regulation Under Universal Standards 3-7
3.2.2 Selection of Metal Constituents for Regulation
Under Universal Standards 3.9
r3.23 Methods for the Analysis of Constituents.
Selected for Regulation Under Universal
Standards 3-10
4.0 TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR
NONWASTEWATERS 4_1
4.1 Applicable and Demonstrated Technologies . 4-1
4.1.1 Applicable and Demonstrated Technologies for
Organic Constituents 4-2
4.1.2 Applicable and Demonstrated Technologies for
Metals 4.7
4.2 Identification of BOAT 4.9
4.2.1 BDAT for Organic Constituents 4-10
4.2.2 BDAT for Metal Constituents ...;......... 4-12
NRJ-073
0629-01.nij
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Page
5.0 NONWASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE
DATA : , 5-1
5.1 Treatment Performance Data Associated with BDAT
Treatment Standards •. 5-2
5.1.1 Concentration in the Treated Waste 5-2
5.1.2 Accuracy Correction Factors '. , . 5-4
5.13 Variability Factors 5-5
5.1.4 Calculation of the Treatment Standard 5-5
5.2 Treatment Performance Data for Organic Constituents 5-5
53 Treatment Performance Data for Metal Constituents .... 5-7
6.0 DEVELOPMENT OF NONWASTEWATER UNIVERSAL
STANDARDS .- 6-1
6.1 Determination of Universal Standards for Organic
Constituents 6-1
6.1.1 Determination of Nonwastewater Universal
Standards for Aromatic Hydrocarbons 6-4
6.1.2 Determination of the Nonwastewater Universal
Standard for Carbon Disulfide 6-6
6.13 Determination of Nonwastewater Universal
Standards for Chlorinated Pesticides 6-7
6.1.4 Determination of Nonwastewater Universal
Standards for Chlorinated Phenolics and
Derivatives 6-13
6.15 Determination of Nonwastewater Universal
Standards for Chlorobenzenes 6-16
6.1.6. Determination of Nonwastewater Universal
Standards for Halogenated Volatiles 6-19
6.1.7 Determination of Nonwastewater Universal
Standards for Nonchlorinated Phenolics 6-30
6.1.8 Determination of Nonwastewater Universal
Standards for Organo-Bromines . . . ., 6-32
6.1.9 Determination of Nonwastewater Universal
Standards for Organo-Nitrogen Compounds 6-35
6.1.10 Determination of Nonwastewater Universal
Standards for Organo-Sulfur Pesticides . 6-41
6.1.11 Determination of Nonwastewater Universal
Standards for Oxygenated Hydrocarbons 6-43 .
6.1.12 Determination of Nonwastewater Universal
Standards for PCBs and Dioxins- 6-47
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.mj
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
6.1.13 Determination of Nonwastewater Universal
Standards for Phthalates ................. . ...... 6-49
6.1.14 Determination of Nonwastewater Universal
Standards for Polymiclear Aromatic
Hydrocarbons ................................ 6-52
6.2 Determination of Universal Standards for Metal
Constituents, Except Vanadium and Chromium . ........... 6-57
6.3 Calculation of Universal Standard for Vanadium ........... 6-66
6.4 Calculation of Universal Standard for Chromium ........... 6-67
6 .5 Application of Universal Standards to Petroleum
Refining Wastes ............... . ....... ............ 6-68
7.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . . ..... . ....... . ................ 7-1
8.0 REFERENCES. ....................................... . g-1
Appendix. A: Analytical Methods for Constituents Regulated Under
Universal Standards
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj Jjj
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Page
ES-1 Universal Standards for Organic Constituents .... ES-5
ES-2 Universal Standards for Metal Constituents ES-19
ES-3 '. Previously Promulgated Nonwastewater Treatment Standards
and Revised Treatment Standards from the Application of
Nonwastewater Universal Standards ES-20
1-1 Cross-Reference Guide for Organic Constituents 1-7
1-2 Cross-Reference Guide for Metal Constituents . 1-16
2-1 • Waste Codes With Treatment Standards Promulgated as
Methods of Treatment 2-4
3-1 Constituents Considered for Regulation Under Universal
Standards 3-12
3-2 Organic BDAT List Constituents Regulated and Not
Regulated Under Universal Standards, by Treatability Group 3-19
3-3 Metal BDAT List Constituents Regulated and Not Regulated
Under Universal Standards 3-30
4-1 BDAT Technologies for Organic Constituents Selected for
Regulation in Nonwastewater Forms of Wastes 4-15
4-2 BDAT Technologies for Metal Constituents Selected for
Regulation in Nonwastewater Forms of Wastes 4-22
5-1 Treatment Performance Database for Organic Constituents
(Nonwastewaters) 5-9
5-2 Treatment Tests from Which Treatment Performance Data
for Organic Constituents Were Used '..... 5-44
5-3 Treatment Performance Database for Metal Constituents
(Nonwastewaters) 5-45
NRJ-073
0629-01.nij . IV
-------
LIST OF TABLES (Continued)
Page
5-4 Treatment Performance Database for Vanadium
(Nonwastewaters) 5.50
5-5 Treatment Performance Database for Chromium.
(Nonwastewaters) 5-51
5-5 Treatment Tests from Which Treatment Performance Data
for Metal Constituents Were Used 5-52
6-1 Summary of Universal Standards and Guide to Locating
Constituent-Specific Discussions of the Determination of
Universal Standards . ; 6-71
6-2 Determination of Universal Treatment Standards for Organic
Constituents (Nonwastewaters) 6-85
6-3 Determination of Universal Treatment Standards for Metal
Constituents (Nonwastewaters) 6-111
6-4 Characterization Data and Treatment Performance Data for
HTMR for Certain. Metal-Bearing Wastes 6-114
6-5 Characterization Data and Treatment Performance Data for
Stabilization for Certain Metal-Bearing Wastes 6-116
6-6 Comparison of Treatment Performance Data for Solvent
Extraction of K048-K052 Wastes with the Universal
Standards 6-118
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nij
-------
-------
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In accordance with the amendments to the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA) enacted in the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments
(HSWA) of November 8, 1984, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or the
Agency) is establishing Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAT) universal
standards for the Listed wastes identified in Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations
Section 261.31 (40 CFR 261.31). Compliance with the treatment standards is a
prerequisite for land disposal of restricted wastes, as defined in 40 CFR Part 268. EPA
may grant variances from the applicable treatment standards in 40 CFR 268.44 and
under 40 CFR 268.8. EPA may grant waste- and site-specific waivers from the
applicable treatment standards under 40 CFR 268.41-268.43.
A universal treatment standard (i.e., universal standard) is a single
concentration-based treatment standard established for a specific constituent; a
constituent has the same treatment standard in each waste code in which it is regulated.
The Agency is establishing two different sets of universal standards: one for
nonwastewater forms of wastes and one for wastewater forms of wastes.1
This background document provides the Agency's rationale and technical
support for selecting the constituents for regulation under universal standards and for
developing the universal standards for nonwastewater forms of Listed hazardous wastes.
'Wastewaters are defined as wastes containing less than 1% (weight basis) total
suspended solids2 (TSS) and less than 1% (weight basis) total organic carbon (TOC).
Wastes not meeting this definition are classified as nonwastewaters and must comply
with a nonwastewater treatment standard.
2The term "total suspended solids" (TSS) clarifies EPA's previously used terminology
of "total solids" and "filterable" solids." Specifically, total suspended solids is measured by
Method 209C (total suspended solids dried at 103-105 °C) in Standard Methods for the
Examination of Water and Wastewater, Sixteenth Edition (1).
NRJ-073 . • '
0629-01.nrj ES-1
-------
The development of the universal standards for wastewater forms of listed hazardous
wastes is presented in Volume B of this two volume set. When promulgated, these
universal standards will replace BDAT treatment standards in most of the previously
promulgated waste codes (as presented in Section 2.0 and Table ES-3) and may be used
in the future to promulgate treatment standards for newly listed wastes.
The Agency selected constituents for regulation under universal standards
from the BDAT List of Constituents as well as other hazardous constituents regulated by
EPA under the RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions Program. Universal standards were
determined for the regulated constituents utilizing constituent-specific treatment
performance data. These data were used to develop BDAT treatment standards in
previous rulemakings. The Agency then evaluated the data on a constituent-by-
constituent basis to determine the data most appropriate to use in establishing a
universal standard. .
The Agency is establishing universal standards for 185 organic constituents
and 14 metal constituents in nonwastewater forms of listed hazardous wastes, and 195
organic constituents and 13 metal constituents hi wastewater forms of listed hazardous
wastes. The Agency's rationale and technical support for establishing universal standards
"for cyanide is provided in a separate document. As discussed in Section 2.1, the number
of constituents selected for regulation in nonwastewater and wastewater forms of
universal standards wastes differ since, in some instances, a constituent may be readily
analyzed in .one waste form (e.g., wastewater) and not in the other form (e.g.,
nonwastewater).
The universal standards for organic constituents in nonwastewater -forms of
listed hazardous wastes are based on incineration, fuel substitution, and sludge drying
treatment performance data that were used to promulgate previous BDAT treatment
standards. The universal standards for metal constituents hi nonwastewater forms of
listed hazardous wastes are based on performance data from High Temperature Metals
NRJ-073
0629-OI.nij V ES-2
-------
Recovery (HTMR) treatment of nonwastewater forms of K061, F006, and K062 wastes,
acid leaching treatment of nonwastewater forms of K071 wastes, stabilization treatment
of nonwastewater forms of D007 wastes, and vitrification of an arsenic-bearing slag.
The universal standards for organic and metal constituents in wastewater
forms of listed hazardous wastes are equal to the treatment standards for wastewater
forms of F039 wastes, with a few exceptions. The universal treatment standards for
wastewaters are based on treatment performance data from several sources, including
the BDAT database, the NPDES database, the WERL database, EPA-colIected
WAO/PACT* data, the HAD database, industry-submitted leachate treatment
performance data, data submitted to EPA by the Chemical Manufacturers Association's
(CMA) Carbon Bisulfide Task Force, data submitted to EPA by the California Toxic
Substances Control Division, data in literature that were not already part of the WERL
database, and data in literature submitted by industry on the WAO and PACT®
treatment processes. These data reflect the performance of numerous industrial
wastewater treatment systems, and the Agency believes it is appropriate to develop
universal standards for wastewaters based on these data. The Agency's rationale and
technical support for establishing universal standards for wastewater forms of wastes is
provided in EPA's Final Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAT> Background
Document for Universal Standards. Volume B: Universal Standards for Wastewater
Forms of Listed Hazardous Wastes (2).
Table ES-1 lists the organic constituents selected for regulation and the
corresponding universal standards for both wastewater and nonwastewater forms of listed
hazardous wastes. Table ES-2 presents the universal standards for metal constituents in
wastewater and nonwastewater forms of listed hazardous wastes. Table ES-3 presents
previously promulgated treatment standards and the revised treatment standards from
the application of universal standards for nonwastewater forms of wastes. This table
presents, by waste code, the revised treatment standards from the application of universal
XRJ-073
0629-Ol.nij ES-3
-------
standards for nonwastewater forms of all of the previously promulgated waste codes to
which universal standards are applicable.
In Table ES-1, the universal standards for organic constituents in
nonwastewater forms of listed hazardous wastes are expressed as the total composition
concentration of each constituent, except as noted for a few constituents. All of the
universal standards for organic constituents in wastewater forms of listed hazardous
wastes are expressed as the total composition concentration of each constituent The
units for the total composition concentrations are measured in mg/kg (weight basis) for
nonwastewater forms of listed hazardous wastes and in mg/L (volume basis) for
wastewater forms of listed hazardous wastes. In Table ES-2, the universal standards for
metal constituents in nonwastewater forms of listed hazardous wastes are expressed as
the concentration in the waste extract, as measured by'the Toxicity Characteristic
Leaching Procedure (TCLP). The units used for leachate data are mg/L. The universal
standards for metal constituents in wastewater forms of listed hazardous wastes are
expressed as total composition values, measured in mg/L.
EPA notes, however, that the wastewater standards being promulgated
apply on a limited basis: only to wastewater managed in treatment systems other than a
Clean Water Act (CWA) or CWA-equivalent treatment system. Thus, facilities
managing decharacterized wastewater in treatment systems with impoundments, and then
discharging to navigable waters or Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs) are not
affected. In the succeding Phase III .rule, EPA is actively considering an approach
whereby technology-based CWA standards for a specific industry or plant also serve as
the BOAT standards.
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nrj v £S-4
-------
m
c/i
6,
Table ES-1
Universal Standards for Organic Constituents
NR - Not Regulated.
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj
Constituent Selected for Regulation
Acenaphthalenc
Acenaphthene
Acetone
Acctonitrilc
Acetophcnone
2-Acetylaminofluorene
Acrolein
Acrylamide
Acrylonitrile
Aldrin
4-Aminobiphenyl
Aniline
Anthracene
Aramite
Ben?.(a)anthracene
Benzal Chloride
CAS#
208-96-8
83-32-9
67-64-1
75-05-8
96-86-2
53-96-3
107-02-8
79-06-1
107-13-1 •
309-00-2
92-67-1
62-53-3
120-12-7
1460-57-8
56-55-3
98-87-3
Universal Standard
Wastewaters
f? Total
| Composition
Concentration
B (mg/L)
0.059
0.059
0.28
5.6
0.010
0.059
0.29
19
0.24
0.021
0.13
0.81
0.059
0.36
0.059
0.055
Nonwastewaters
total
Composition
Concentration
(me/kg)
3.4
3.4
160
1.8
9.7
140
MR
23
84
0.066
MR
14
3.4
NR
3.4
6.0
-------
m
CO
Table ES-1
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for Regulation
Benzene
Sum of Bcnzo(b)fluoranthehe and
Benzo(k)fluoranthene'
Benzo(b)fluoranthene'>b
BenzoMfluoranthene"-11
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(a)pyrehe
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Bromodichloromethane
Broraoform (Tribromomethane)
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether
CAS #
71-43-2
205-99-2/207-08-9
205-99-2
207-08-9
191-24-2
50-32-8
319-84-6
319-85-7
319-86-6
58-89-9
75-27-4
75-25-2
101-55-3
Unlverwl Standard
•:- Wasfewater?
ft. Total
i Composition ,
Concentration
1 («n«/D
0.14
0.11'
o.ir*
0.11^
0.0055
0.061
0.00014
0.00014
0.023
0.0017
0.35
0.63
0.055
Nonwastwatera
Total
Composition
Concentration
10
6.8*
6.8"-k
6.8->
1.8
34
0.066
0.066
0.066
0.066
15
15
15
;As discussed in Section 3.2.1, benzo(b)fluoranthene and bcnzo(k)fluoranthene are regulated as a sum under universal standards
com 3s nonwastewater forms of wastes to compensate for analytical concerns in distinguishing between the two
!? benzo(b)fluoranthene and benzo(k)fluoranthene are not both regulated in a specific waste code, the universal standard for
the individual isomer will be equivalent to the universal standard for the sum of benzo(b)fluoranthene and benzo(k)fluoranthene.
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj
-------
ffl
C/5
Table ES-1
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for Regulation
Bromomethane (Methyl Bromide)
n-Butanol
Butyl Benzyl Phthalate
2-scc-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol (Dinoseb)
Carbon Disulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlordane
p-Chloroaniline
Chlorobenzene
Chlorobenzilate
2-Chloro- 1,3-butadiene
Chlorodibromomelhane
Chloroethane
•-- ::'-.'' ;. " ••
#:?CAS#- ";-:;"
74-83-9
71-36-3
85-68-7
88-85-7
75-15-0
56-23-5
57-74-9
106-47-8
108-90-7
510-15-6
126-99-8
124-48-1
75-00-3
Universal Standard I
Wastewater?
Total
Composition
Concentration
(mg/L)
0.11
5.6
0.017
0.066
3.8
0.057
0.0033
0.46
0.057
0.10
0.057
0.057
0.27
Nonwastewgters
Total
Composition
Concentration
(mg/kg)
15
2.6
28
2.5
4.8°
6.0
0.26
16
6.0
NR
0.28
15
6.0
"As discussed in the development of treatment standards for F001-F005 wastes, this constituent is controlled by regulating other organic compounds in
the waste, unless the only listed hazardous constituents in the waste are carbon disulfide, cyclohexanone, and/or methanol. In such cases, the universal
standard for this constituent will be applicable and compliance will be determined by analysis of the TCLP extract.
NR - Not Regulated. .
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.ntj
-------
m
GO
Constituent Selected for Regulation
t-Chloroetho
bis(2-Chloroethyl)cther
2-Chloroclhyl vinyl ether
bjs(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
2-Chlorophenol
3-Chloropropene
Chrysene
Cresol (m- and p-isomers)
(3-Methylphenol. 4-Methylphenol)
o-Cresol (2-Methyiphenol^
Cyclohexanone
o.p'-DDD
Table ES-1
(Continued)
tion
ammmaommm
••MMM
— ™«— ™«™,
•MHBMWMBM
••M^MH
^•••M
IM^HM
•••^•m
67^6-3
•~*~i~~*mmf
108-60-1
59-50-7
74-87-3
91-58-7
95-57-8
107-05-1
218-01-9
V««B^V^—^
106-44-5
95-48-7
••' ni
108-94-1
53-19-0
UalvettMd Standard
Waatewatera
Total
' ComposJUon
Concentration
0.055
0.018
MWB^MV
0.19
0.05.
0.04^
0.03(
0.05$
0.77
E
0.023
Total
Composition
Concentration
s,anda,d fo, lh
NR - Not Regulated.
be
'" "*
NRJ-073
0629-01.nq
-------
m
C/5
Jo
NR - Not Regulated.
NRJ-073
((629-01.nrj
Table ES-1
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for Regulation
p.p'-DDD
o,p'-DDE
p,p'-DDE
o,p' DDT
p,p'-DDT
Dibcn/(a,h)anthraccne
Dibenzo(a,e)pyrene
l,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
Dibromomethane
tris-(2,3-Dibromopropyl)phosphate
(m) 1,3-Dichlorobenzene
(o) 1,2-Dichlorobenzene
(p) 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
•/• - ' '-
i-:;k- • :. ' - ,
:?:•: .. • •• '• '
*": CAS#-
72-54-8
3424-82-6
72-55-9
789-02-6
50-29-3
53-70-3
192-65-4
96-12-8
74-95-3
126-72-7
541-73-1
95-50-1
106-46-7
75-71-8
75-34-3
107-06-2
: ; Universal
Wastewaters
: 1 Totftl
i Composition
: Conctntratida
If (mg/L)
0.023
0.031
0.031
0.0039
0.0039
0.055 .
0.061
0.11
0.11
0.11 .
0.036
0.088
0.090
0.23
0.059
0.21
1 Standard
Nonwastewaters
Total
Composition
Concentration
(wg/kR)
0.087
0.087
0.087 .
0.087
0.087
8.2
NR
15
15
0.10
6.0
6.0
6.0
7.2
6.0
6.0
-------
m
.CO
NR - Not Regulated.
NRJ-073
0629-01.nij
Table ES-1
(Continued)
.— =rE^^SJ!l I.,,-. .'• • _ -'--LI im. Mi -..._,_ __..liJ.L1|_. _ _ .- 1^,1 _ ^i.
Constituent Selected for Regulation
1,1-DichIoroelhylcne
trans-l,2-Dichlorocthylcne
2,4-Dichlorophcnol
2,6-Dichlorophcnol
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid (2,4-D)
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis- 1,3-Dichloropropene
trans- 1,3-Dichloropropene
Dieldrin
Diethyl Phthalate
p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
2,4-Dimethyl Phenol
Dimethyl Phthalate
Di-n-butyl Phthalate
1,4-Dinitrobenzene
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
'•'" ' • •••••••^^•••••Ji -._-.
•frl-
75-35-4
156-60-5
120-83-2
87-65-0
94-75-7
78-87-5 .
10061-01-5
10061-02-6
60-57-1
84-66-2
60-11-7
105^67-9
131-11-3
84-74-2
100-25-4
534-52-1
mmmas==ssstamamim
Unlvenn
WastewMera
Composition
Concentration
0.025
0.054
0.044
0.044
0.72
0.85
0.036
0.036
0.017
0.20
0.13
0.036
0.047
0.057
032
0.28
1 Standard
Noinwtarafera
. TbtaT
Composition
Concentration
(rag/kg) '
6.0
30
14
14
10
18
18
18
0.13
28
NR
14
28
28
2.3
160
-------
rn
Table ES-1
(Continued)
NR - Not Regulated.
Constituent Selected for Regulation
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrololucnc
2,6-Dinitrotolucne
Di-n-octyl Phthalale
1,4-Dioxane
Sum of Diphenylamine and
DipKenylnitrosamined
Diphenylamined>c
Diphenylnitrosamine'''0
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
Di-n-propylnitrosamine
Disulfoton
Endosulfan 1
i CAS #
51-28-5
12M4-2
606-20-2
117-84-0
123-91-1
122-39-4/86-30-6
122-39-4
86-30-6
122-66-7
621-64-7
298-04-4
959-98-8
Universal Standard
Wastewaters
Total
Composition
Concentration
(mg/L)
0.12
0.32
0.55
0.017
NR
0.92*
0.92?+
0.92*-
0.087
0.40
0.017
0.023
Nonwasiewaters
Total
Composition
Concentration
(mg/kg)
160
140
28
28
170
13d
13d-0
13"
NR
14
6.2
0.066
dAs discussed in Section 3.2.1, diphenylamine and diphenylnitrosamine are regulated as a sum under universal standards in wastewater and
nonwastewater forms of waste to compensate for analytical concerns in distinguishing between the two compounds.
If diphenylamine and diphenylnitrosamine are not both regulated in a specific waste code, the universal standard fo
equivalent .to the universal standard for the sum of diphenylamine and diphenylnitrosamine.
for the individual isomer will be
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj
-------
m
CO
t-»
ts)
NR - Not Regulated.
Table ES-1
(Continued)
" —
Constituent Selected for Regulation
Endosulfan II
Endosulran Sulfate
° Endrin
Endrin Aldehyde
Ethyl Acetate
Ethyl Ether
bis(2-EthylhexyI)phthalate
Ethyl Methacrylate
' Ethylbenzene
Ethylene Dibromide (1,2-Dibromoethane)
Ethylene Oxide
Famphur
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Heptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
• " ' ====«»»»a»»g=aisa»ci==s=i=s=====
SI?'' '" '• -.
"?W-CA$#." -•
33213-65-9
1031-07-8
72-20-8
7421-93-4
141-78-6
60-29-7
117-81-7
97-63-2
100-41-4
106-93-4
75-21-8
52-85-7
206-44-0
86-73-7
76-44-8
1024-57-3
Universal Standard
Wastewaters
Total
Composition
Concentration
- (mg/L)
0.029
0.029
0.0028
0.025
0.34
0.12
0.28
0.14
0.057
0.028
0.12
0.017
0.068 .
0.059
0.0012
0.016
Nomnwtfwitew
Total
Composition
Concentration
Onjj/ks)
i2S/!S
0.13
013
013
013
33 1
160 II
28
160
10
15
MR
15
34
34
0066
0.066
NRJ-073
0629-01.nij
-------
m
(/>
i—i
OJ
Table ES-1
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for Regulation
Hexachlorobenzcnc
Hexachlorabutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopcntadiene
Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins
Hexachlorodibenzofurans
Hexachloroethane
Hexachloropropene
Indcno(l,2,3)pyrene
lodomethane
Isobutanol
Isodrin
Isosafrole
Kepone
Methacrylonitrile
Methanol
CAS #
118-74-1
87-68-3
77-47-4
.
'
67-72-1
1888-71-7
193-39-5
74-88-4
78-83-1
465-73-6
120-58-1
143-50-0
126-98-7
67-56-1
;.: Universal
Wastewaters
II Total
f Composition
Concentration
-------
m
CO
NR - Not Regulated.
Table ES-1
(Continued)
*f. Total
Composition
Concentration
Total
Composition
Concentration
(nog/kg)
Constituent Selected for Regulation
Mcthapvrilcne
Hi^^H
hlor
91-80-5
MMBM^WM
72-43-5
MM^HOI^B^
78-93-3
•^M^MI^MB
108-10-1
Methyl Ethyl Kctonc
Methyl Isobutyl Kctone
Methyl Methacrvlate
80-62-6
•^^••••^Hl
66-27-3
•"••^••WMB
298-00-0
'^•^^MHMMB
56-49-5
•• !!••
75-09-2
•MMHMM^iBI
101-14-4
"••"^w^w^
91-20-3
Methyl Mcthanesulfonate
Methyl Parathion
3-Methylcholanthrene
"•^«
Methylene Chloride
4)4>-Methylene-bis(2-chlnrnanilinf.)
2-Naphthylamine
p-Nitroaniline (2-Nitroaniline
•Nitroaniline (4-Nitroaniline
Nitrobenzene
N-Nitroso-di-n-butylamine
NRJ-073
0629-01.nij
-------
m
C/J
Table ES-1
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for Regulation
N-Nitrosodiethylaminc
N-Nitrosodimelhylamine
N-Nilrosomethylethylamine
N-Nilrosomorpholine
N-Nitrosopiperidinc
N-Nilrosopyrrolidinc
o-Nitrophcnol (2-Nitrophenol)
p-Nitrophenol (4-Nitrophenol)
5-Nitro-o-toIuidine
Parathion
Pentachlorobenzene
Pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins
Pentachlorodibenzofurans
Pentachloroethane
Pentachloronitrobcnzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenacetin
'•?.-. CAS#
55-18-5
62-75-9
10595-95-6
59-98-2
100-75-4
930-55-2
88-75-5
100-02-7
99-65-8
56-38-2
608-93-5
.
_
76-01-7
82-68-8
87-86-5
62-44-2
: Universa
Wastewaters
fe Total ,
! Composition
: Concentration
l (mg/L)
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.013
0.013
0.028
0.12
0.32
0.014
0.055
0.000063
0.000035
0.055
0.055
0.089
0.081
Standard.
Nonwastewaters
Total
Composition
Concentration
(mg/kg)
28
2.3
2.3
2.3
35
35
13
29
28
4.6
10
0.001
0.001
6.0
4.8
1A
16
NRJ-073
Ofi29-OI.nl)
-------
m
CO
>-i
ON
Table ES-i
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for Regulation
Phenacetin
Phcnanthrcne
Phenol
Phoralc
Phthalic Anhydride'
Phthalic Anhydride' (as measured by Phthalic
Acid)
Pronamide
Propanenitrile (Ethyl Cyanide)
Pyrene
Pyridine
Safrole
Silvex (2,4,5-TP)
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins
Tetrachlorodibenzofurans
%.":"'CAS# .
62-44-2
85-01-8
108-95-2
298-02-2
85-44-9
85-44-9
23950-58-5
107-12-0
129-00-0
110-86-1
94-59-7
93-72-1
95-94-3
.
- •
Universal Standard
Wastewaters
.£ total
".Composition
Concentration
M (nuj/L) ,
0.081
0.059
0.039
0.021
0.055
0.055
0.093
0.24
0.067
0.014
0.081
0.72
0.055
0.000063
0.000063
Nonvrestevmtei*
Total
Composition
Concentration .
(rag/kg)
16
5.6
6.2
4.6
28
28
1.5
360
82
16
22
7.9
14
0.001
0.001
the Agency is establishing universal standards for phthalic anhydride and phthalic anhydride (as measured by phthalic acid) to compensate for
possible analytical difficulties in the accurate quantification of phthalic anhydride.
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj
-------
I
H-»
-J
Table ES-1
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for Regulation
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroc thane
1,1,2,2-Tctrachloroc thane
Tetrachloroethylchc
2,3,4,6-TctrachIorophcnoI
Toluene (Methyl Benzene)
Total PCBs
Toxaphene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Trichloromonofluoromethane
(Fluorotrichloromethane)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyacctic Acid (2,4,5-T)
1,2,3-TricWoropropane
1, 1 ,2-Trichloro- 1,2,2-trifluoroethane
CAS#
630-20-6
79-34-5
127-18-4
58-90-2
108-88-3
1336-36-3
8001-35-1
120-82-1
71-55-6
79-00-5
79-01-6
75-69-4
95-95-4
88-06-2
93-76-5
96-18-4
76-13-1
; Universal Standard
•': = Wastewaterji
II' Total
Composition
Concentration
I (mg/t)
0.057
0.057
. 0.056
0.030
0.080
0.10
0.0095
0.055
0.054
0.054
0.054
0.020
0.18
0.035
0.72
0.85
0.057
Nonwastewaters
Total
Composition
Concentration
(rag/kg)
6.0
6.0
6.0
7.4
10
10
2.6
19
6.0
6.0
6.0
30
7.4
7.4
7.9
30
30
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj
-------
m
00
I—'
00
Constituent Selected for Regulation
Vinyl Chloride
Xylcne(s) (lotal)
Table ES-1
(Continued)
Unlveml Standard
Wastewntera
Tot«!
Composition
: Concentration
Total
Composition
Concentration
NRI-073
0629-Ol.nij
-------
Table ES-2
Universal Standards for Metal Constituents
BOAT List Constituent Selected for
Regulation
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
CAS# •:":-:
7740-36-0
7740-38-2
7740-39-3
7740-41-7
7740-43-9
7740-47-3
7439-92-1
7439-97-6
7440-02-0
7782-49-2
7440-22-4
7440-28-0
7440-62-2
7440-66-6
Universal Standard
Wastewaters .
Total Composition .
Concentration (ntg/L)
1.9
1.4
1.2
0.82
0.69
2.77
0.69
0.15
3.98 ,
0.82
0.43
1.4
4.3
NR
Nomvastewaters
Concentration In TCLP Extract
<»g/L)
2.1
5.0
7.6
0.014
0.19
0.86
0.37
0.20 (Low-mercury subcategory
wastes* - RMERC*1 residues
0.025 (Low-mercury subcategory
wastes* - Non-RMERC* residues
5.0
0.16
0.30
0.078
0.23
5.3
m
GO
•Low-mercury subcategory wastes = Listed wastes with mercury concentrations less than 260 mg/kg.
bRMERC = Mercury recovery by roasting/retorting.
NR - Not Regulated.
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nrj
-------
Table ES-3
Previously Promulgated Nonwastewater Treatment Standards and
Revised Treatment Standards from the Application of
Nonwastewater Universal Standards
Regulated Hazardous
Constituents
Previously Promulgated
; Treatment Standard
Total
(mg/kg)
TCLP
(mg/L)
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal
•••• Standards
Total
(mg/kg)
TCLP
(mg/L)
F001 - F005
Acetone
Butanol
Carbon Bisulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Cresol (m- and p- isomers)
o-Cresol
Cyclohexanone
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Ethyl Acetate
I Ethylbenzene
Ethyl Ether
Isobutanol
Methanol
Methylene Chloride
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
Nitrobenzene
Pyridine
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
1,1, l-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
U,2-Trichloro-l,2,2-
trifluoroethane
Trichloromonofluoromethane
Xylenes (total)
160
2.6
5.6
5.7
3.2
5.6
6.2
33
6.0
160
170
33
36
33
14
16
5.6
28
5.6
5.6
28
33
28
4.8'
0.75*
0.75*
160
2.6
6.0
6.0
5.6
5.6
6.0
33
10
160
170
30
36
33
14
16
6.0
10
6.0
6.0
30
30
30
4.8'
0.751
0.75'
NRJ-073
ES-20
-------
Table ES-2
(Continued)
. Regulated Hazardous
Constituents
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total
(mg/kg)
TCLP
(fflg/L)
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal
Standards
Total
$ng?b&
TCLP
(mg/Lt
F006 (Treatment Standards Based on Stabilization)
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Lead
Nickel
Silver
Cyanides (total)
Cyanides (amenable)
_
-
_
-
.
590
30
0.066
52
0.51
0.32
0.072
-
-
—
.
_
.
.
DE
DE
0.19
0.86
037
5.0
0.30
-
F006" (Alternative Treatment Standards Based on HTMR)
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Lead
Mercury
'Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Zinc
Cyanides (total)
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- •
.
'
-
1.8
2.1
0.055
7.6
0.014
0.19
0.33
0.37
0.009
5.0
0.16
0.30
0.078
5.3
-
—
.
.
.
_
_
_
-
, -
.
_
_
_
.
.
DE
2.1
5.0
7.6
0.014
0.19
0.86
037
0.009"
0.20°
0.025d
5.0
0.16
0.30
0.078
5.3
-
F007
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Lead
Nickel
Silver
Cyanides (total)
Cyanides (amenable)
»
-
-
.
'
590
30
0.066
• 5.2
0.51
0.32
0.072
-
•
—
_
.
'
.
DE
DE
0.19
0.86
' 0.37
5.0
0.30
.
-
NRJ-073
0629-02.nr)
ES-21
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal
Standards
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Regulated Hazardous
Constituent* x
TCLP
(mg/L)
Total
(mg/kg)
TCLP
(ffig/L)
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Lead
Nickel
Silver
Cyanides (total)
Cyanides (amenable)
0.19
0.86
037
5.0
030
0.51
032
0.072
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Lead
Nickel
Silver
Cyanides (total)
Cyanides (amenable)
Cyanides (total)
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Lead
Nickel
Silver
Cyanides (total)
Cyanides (amenable)
0.066
5.2
0.51
0.32
0.072
0.19
0.86
037
5.0
0.30
NRJ-073
0629-02.nq
ES-22 .
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
Regulated Hazardous
'•^^^•-GattSt&Ueni*
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total
(mg/kg)
TCLP
(mg/L)
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal
Standards
Toital
-------
Regulated Hazardous
Constituent*
Table ES-3
(Continued)
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total
TCLP
(mg/L)
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal
Standards
Total
TCLP
(ttg/L)
F024
2-Chloro-l,3-butadiene
3-ChIoropropene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
trans-l,3-Dichloropropene
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate
Hexachloroethane
Chromium (total)
Nickel
0.073
0.088
Carbon Tetracbloride
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
Methylene Chloride
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl Chloride
F025 (Light Ends Subcategory)
F02S (Spent Filter Aids and
0.86
5.0
1 — _ •_=
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chloroform
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachloroethane ..
Methylene Chloride
1. 1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl Chloride
6.2
6.2
37
28
30
31
6.2
5.6
33
-
*wa»Kguijr/
f\ ft
6 n
m
S ft
J.O
•3f)
30
60
60
6.0
>
NRJ-OT3
0629-OZnij
ES-24
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
Regulated Hazardous
Constituents
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total
(mg/kg)
TCLP
(mg/L)
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal
Standards
Total
(rag/kg)
TCLP
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
I
I ••-'•'•; :;v : .' -; •• •-.•-•
I "
Regulated Hazardous
Constituents
Previoosly Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total
{mg/fcg?T
TCtP
Co»flL>
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal
Standards
Total
» TCLP
(Mg^>
FQ39
1 Acenaphthalene
B Acenaphthene
1 Acetone
S Acetophenone
1 2-Acetylaminofluorene
| Aciylonitrile
8 Aldrin
1 Aniline
B Anthracene
Aroclor 1016
Arodor 1221
Aroclor 1232
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
Benz(a)anthracene
Benzene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(a)pyrene
3.4
4.0
160
9.7
140
84
0.066
14
4.0
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
1.8
1.8
8.2
36 -
3.4.
3.4
1.5
8.2 '
•_
_
_
M
.
.
; —
^
•
_
•
_
•
M
.
.
_ •
»
•—
_
.
-
3.4
3.4
160
9.7
140
84
0.066
. 14
3.4
NRe
NR6
NRe
NR»
NRe
NRe
NRe
3.4
10
6.8f
6.8f
1.8
3.4
•
.
.
'
.
.
_•
.
'.
.
.
-
NRJ-073
ES-26
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
. Regulated Hazardous
Constituents
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total
(mg/kg)
TCIP
(mg/L)
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal
Standards
Total
(mg/ltg)
TCLP
(mg/L)
F039 (continued)
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Bromodichloromethane
Bromomethane (Methyl
Bromide)
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether
n-Butanol
Butyl Benzyl Phthalate
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
(Dinoseb)
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlordane (alpha & gamma
isomers)
p-Chloroaniline
Chlorobenzene
Chlorodibromomethane
Chloroethane
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
Chloroform
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
p-Chloro-m-cresol
Chloromethane (Methyl
Chloride)
2-Chloronaphthalene
2-Chlorophenol
3-Chloropropene
Chrysene
Cresol (m- and p- isomers)
o-Cresol
0.066
0.066
0.066
0.066
15
15
15
2.6
7.9
25
5.6
0.13
16
5.7
15
6.0
7.2
7.2
5.6
7.2
14
33
5.6
5.7
28
8.2
3.2
. 5.6
-
-
-
-
-
'
-
-
-
-
.'
T
r
-
-
- '
-
-'•
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
.'
-
0.066
0.066
0.066
0.066
- 15
15
15
2.6
28
25
6.0
0.26
16
6.0
15
6.0
7.2
6.0
6.0
7.2
14
30
5.6
5.7
30
3.4
5.6
5.6
.
.
.
• -
•
.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-.
.
-
-
'
-
"
-
-
- •
.
NRJ-073
0629-02.nij
ES-27
-------
Regulated Hazardous
Constituents
o,p'-DDD
p-p'-DDD
o,p'-DDE
p,p'-DDE
o,p'-DDT
p,p'-DDT
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
l,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
1,2-Dibromomethane
(Ethylene Dibromide)
Dibromomethane
m-Dichlorobenzene
o-Dichlorobenzene
p-Dichlorobenzene
Dichlorodiflubromethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
trans-l,2-Dichloroethylene
2,4-Dichlo'rophenol
2,6-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic
Acid (2,4-D)
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis- 1,3-Dichloropropene
trans-1.3-Dichloropropene
Dieldrin
Diethyl Phthalate
2,4-Dimethylphenol
Dimethyl Phthalate
Di-n-butyl Phthalate
1,4-Dinitrobenzene
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresoI
Table ES-3
(Continued)
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total
TCIP
F039 (continued)
0.087
0.087
0.087
0.087
0.087
0.087
8.2
15
15
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal
" ; Standards
Total
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
.'" ":'' . .'.':•:•'' ' '
Regulated Hazardous
Constituents
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total
F039 (continued)
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Di-n-octyl Phthalate
Di-n-propylnitrosamine
1,4-Dioxane
Disulfoton
Endosulfan I
Endosulfan n
Endosulfan Sulfate
Endrin
Endrin Aldehyde
Ethyl Acetate
Ethyl Benzene
Ethyl Cyanide
(Propanenitrile)
Ethyl Ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Ethyl Methacrylate
Famphur
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Heptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachlorodibenzofurans
Hexach lorod i benzo-p-dioxins
Hexachloroethane
Hexachloropropene
Indeno(l,2,3-c,d)pyrene
lodomethane
160
140
28
28
14
170
6.2
0.066
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
33
6.0
360
160
28
160
15
8.2
4.0
0.066
0.066
37
28
3.6
0.001
0.001
28
28
8.2
65
_
•
-
.
_
. •
_
-
.
_
.
_
.
.
.
.
_
-
_
_
.
_
.
.
.
.
_
.
.
_
.
- -
160
140
28
28
14
170
6.2
0.066
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
33
10
360
160
28
160
15
3.4
3.4 .
0.066
0.066
10
5.6
• 2.4
0.001
0.001
30
. 30
3.4
65
•
m
—
•>
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
^
1 «
—
—
.
_
_
—
" _
—
_
.
_
^
_
••
.
*
-
NRJ-073
0629-02.nrj
ES-29
-------
Regulated Hazardous
Constituent* ;'
Table ES-3
(Continued)
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total
TCLP
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
" ••"""•'•. ' ..;•'.=', : .
Regulated Hazardous
•'^-•&;:m Constituents
Previously Promulgated
• Treatment Standard
Total
Ong/fc$
TOP
(mg/L)
Revised Treatment
. Standard fix>m the
Application of Universal
Standards
Total ,
<»g/icg>
TCLP
(rag/L>
F039 (continued)
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Phorate
Pronamide
Pyrene
Pyridine
Safrole
SUvex (2,4,5-TP)
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
Tetrachlorodibenzofurans
Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins
1, 1, 1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
Toluene
Total PCBs
Toxaphene
Tribromomethane
(Bromoform)
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Trichloromonofluoromethane
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyacetic
Acid
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
l,l,2-Trichloro-l,2,2-
trifluoroethane
3.1
6.2
4.6
1.5
8.2
16
22
7.9
19
0.001
0.001
42
42
5.6
37
28
NR
1.3
15
19
5.6
5.6
5.6
33
37
37
7.9
28 ,
28
—
•
_
.
.
-
.
.
_
.
_
/
.
.
-
.
_
.
.
.
.
_
_
-
_
.
-
.
_
5.6
62
4.6
1.5
8.2
16
22
7.9
14
0.001
0.001
6.0
6.0
6.0
7.4
10
10°
2.6
15
19
6.0
6.0
6.0
30
7.4
7.4
7.9
30
30
—
—
m
—
—
^
—
«*
m
—
•
—
— •
.
.
—
„
.
_
.
—
.
_
.
_
.
_
-
NRJ-073
0629-02.nrj
ES-31
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
Regulated Hazardous
Constituent*
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total
(mg/kg)
TCLP
TCLP
(mg/L>
F039 (continued)
Vinyl Chloride
Xylenes
Cyanides (total)
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
33
28
1.8
-
.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
.
.
0.23
5.0
52
0.066
5.2
0.51
0.025
0.32
5.7
0.072
6.0
30
DE
_
.'
• -
.
_
_
. -
-
.
.
-
—
_
2.1
5.0
7.6
0.19
0.86
037
0.025b
0.20°
0.025d
5.0
0.16
0.30
K001
Naphthalene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Toluene
Xylenes (total)
Lead
1.5
' 7.4
1.5
1.5
28
33
-
—
_
.
_
.
.
0.51
5.6
7.4
5.6
8.2
10
30
. .
.
_
—
—
.
•»
.0.37
K002
Chromium (total)
Lead
»
-
0.094
0.37
—
-
0.86
0.37
K003
Chromium (total)
Lead •
0
_
0.094
, 0.37
—
-
0.86
0.37
NRJ-073
ESr32
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
Regulated Hazardous
Constituents
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total
(mg/kg)
TCLP
(fflg/L)
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal
Standards
Total
(mg/kg)
TCLP
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
Regulated Hazardous
Constituent* , "
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total
(mg/kg)
TCLP
(mg/L)
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal
Standards
Total
(ing/kg)
TCLP
(mg/L)
K011 „ ,
Acetonitrile
1 Aciylonitrile
1 Acrylamide
1 Benzene
I Cyanide
1.8
1.4
23
0.03
57
•*
1.8
84
23
10
DE
-
B ,..,,;•,::,,,.,, K013 .:v.S:L :.^ '•'... -..-..' '
Acetonitrile
Acrylonitrile
Aaylamide
Benzene
Cyanide
1.8
1.4
23
0.03
57
.
1.8
84
23
10
DE
-
! • K014 ' '"'"" ':"
Acetonitrile
Acrylonitrile
Acrylamide
Benzene
[ Cyanide
1.8
1.4
23
0.03
57
-
1.8
84
23
10
DE
-
| . K01S
1 Anthracene
Benzal Chloride
Sum of Benzo(b)- and
I Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Phenanthrene
Toluene
Chromium (total)
Nickel
3.4
6.2
3.4
3.4
6.0
1.7
0.2
3.4
6.0
6.8f
5.6
10
0.86
5.0
NRJ-073
0639-Q2.ru}
ES-34
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
i
Regulated Hazardous
Constituents
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal
Standards
Total
(rag/Tig)
TCLP
(mg/£)
K016
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
28
5.6
5.6
28
6.0
-
10
5.6
2.4
30
6.0
-
'"...,., . KOIT^^-^^^I^ ':.-"'..,.
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
1,2-Dichloropropane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
12
18
28
. .
6.0
18
30
1
'• :^--:\. ' '"';. '• K018
Chloroethane
1, 1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachloroethane
Pehtachloroethane
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
6.0
6.0
6.0
28
5.6
28
5.6
6.0
-
6.0
6.0
6.0
10
5.6
30
6.0
6.0
-
K019
Chlorobenzene
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
Hexachloroethane
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Tetrachloroethylene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
6.0
5.6
6.0
6.0
28
5.6
5.6
6.0
19
6.0
-
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
30
5.6
5.6
6.0
19
6.0
-
NRJ-073
0629-02-nij
ES-35
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal
Standards
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Regulated Hazardous
Constituents
TCLP
(mg/L>
Total
1,2-DichIoroethane
1,1,2^-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chloroform
Antimony
K022
Acetophenone
Sum of Diphenylamine and
Diphenylnitrosamine
Phenol
Toluene
Chromium (total)
Nickel
19
13
12
0.034
5.2
0.32
9.7
13*
6.2
10
0.86
5.0
K023
Phthalic Anhydride (as
measured by Phthalic acid)
28
28
K024
1 Phthalic Anhydride (as
1 measured by Phthalic acid)
28
-
28 ,
-
NRJ.073
0629.02.nij
ES-36
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
Regulated Hazardous
Constituents
, • •
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total
Ong/fcgJ
TCLP
Cmg/L)
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal
Standards
Total
(mgflcg)
TCLP
(mg/L>
Kfl28
1, 1-Dichloroethane
trans-l,2-Dichloroethane
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachloroethane
Pentachlorpethane
1, 1, 1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
Chromium (total)
Lead
Nickel
6.0
6.0
5.6
28
5.6
5.6
5.6
6.0
6.0
6.0
-
-
—
_
.
-
.
.
-
.
-
.
0.073
0.021
0.088
6.0
6.0
5.6
30
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
..
_
-
.
_
.
'
•
.
_
•
_
.
0.86
0.37
5.0
K029
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroethane
1, 1-Dichloroethylene
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Vinyl Chloride
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
—
-
-
m
-.
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
—
.
.
.
•
K030
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachloroethane
Hexachloropropylene
Pentachlorobenzene
Pentachloroethane
1.2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
Tetrachloroethylene
1.2,4-Trichlorobenzene
5.6
28
19
28
5.6
14
6.0
19
,.
-
-
' ' '
-
.
.
'
5.6
30 .
30
10
6.0
14
6.0
19
—
.
-
,
.
_
-
-
K031
Arsenic
-
5.6
-
5.0
NRJ-073
0629-02.mj
ES-37
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
Regulated Hazardous
Constituent* ^
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard'
Total
.TCLP
Revised Treatment 1
Standard from the
Application of Universal
Standards
Total
TCLP
(mg/L)
*"•""- * ITftft^to J-
' ' ~ -, MmTfJ^f ^ •* ' f fff ~"f
1 Chlordane
B Heptachlor
1 Heptachlor Epoxide
1 Hexachlorocyclopehtadiene
0.26
0.066,
0.066
2.4
-
0.26
0.066
0.066
2.4
-
1 ' K033 • .- ::-s.a^:4r:.-. :.:-.'•• ,< ' .;
1 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2.4
.
2.4
K034
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2.4
-
• 2.4
—
.
'• ••• '• K035 v - - ;^>^^;;'
IAcenaphthene
Anthracene
Benz(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Chrysene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Indeno(l^,3-cd)pyrene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4 -
3.4
8.2
-
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
8.2
3.4
3.4
3.4
5.6
5.6
8.2
• -
K036
Disulfoton
0.1
-
6.2
_
K037
Disulfoton
j Toluene
0.1
28
•
6.2
10
- •
K038
j Phorate
0.1
-
4.6
-
NRJ-073
ES-38
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
Regulated Hazardous
Constituents
-
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total
(mg/kg)
TCLP
K040
Phorate
0.1
-
4.6
-
K04j ,; : ... :;
• .---•'. -.---. •:••:, ,:. •-:..-:-.•••., .•.. "".*• •...:;••••..•'.-,.-... ^;^.1:.;.::;.;::;;;.:;..-.x-:::;:.-:::;.:::.:.::.:.:.::.-:-- - V- • •;••'•••'••. -'•;:• .;. • ,,
Toxaphene
2.6
'-
2.6
•
. • - K042 '-^^ :,:™,; -.;• ','. ,
o-Dichlorobenzene
p-Dichlorobenzene
Pentachlorobenzene
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
4.4 .
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
.
-
-
-•
-
6.0
6.0
10
14
19
—
-
.
.
-
': • ; ' ' :;";'"^ '' ' K043 * ' v-::
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,6-Dichlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Tetrachlorophenols
Pentachlorophenol
Tetrachloroethylene
Hexachlorodibenzofurans
Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins
Pentachlorodibenzofurans
Pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins
Tetrachlorodibenzofurans
Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins
0.38
0.34
8.2
7.6
0.68
1.9
1.7
0.001
0.001
0.001.
0.001
0.001
0.001
_
-
-
.
-
-
-
-
- -
. -
'
-
14
14
7.4
7.4
0.68
7.4
6.0
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-.
-
-
-
-
-
K046
Lead
-
0.18
-
0.37
NRJ-073
0629-02.nq
ES-39
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal
Standards
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Regulated Hazardous
Constituent* ',
Total
(rag/kg)
TCLP
(mg/L)
Total
^» V
6.2
8.2
10
30
DE
-
•
086
\j*\j\j
5.0
-
-
If
086
5-°
0629-02,nq
ES-40
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
Regulated Hazardous
'';--»-^m-<:&mstitoieate
r '.:. . •.. . , .' •••••.•
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total
(mg/kg)
TOP
(mg/L)
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal
Standards
Total
(mg/kg)
TCLP
(mg/L)
K050
Benzo(a)pyrene
Phenol
Cyanides (total)
Chromium (total)
Nickel
12
3.6
1.8
"
-
—
.
»
1.7
0.20
3.4
62
DE
- .
.
0.86
5.0
. ;.:••...,• •• K05!.\.',:.:.::'.':',x:; ..;..•;:•';.? '.:':.' •,-.-..:.':..!....'.• .-.;.•-
Anthracene
Benzene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Chrysene
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Ethylbenzene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Pyrene
Toluene
Xylene(s)
Cyanides (total)
Chromium (total)
Nickel
28
14
20
12
73
15
3.6
14
42
34
3.6
36
14
22
1.8
.
-
...
_
.
_
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
_
_
1.7
0.20
3.4
10
3.4
3.4
28
3.4
28
10
5.6
5.6
6.2
8.2
10
30
DE
-
_
.
'
.
—
.
.
—
—
'
.
.
—
—
0.86
5.0
NRJ-073
0629-02.nrj
ES-41
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
Regulated Hazardous
Constituent* < \ j
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total
(mg/fcg*
TCLP
(aig/L>
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal
Standards
Total
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
Regulated Hazardous
; ''*? ™;:^-:-€J«)n^itB«rtt8
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total
(mg/fc$
TCLP
<«g/L)
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal
Standards
Total
(mgylcg)
TCLP
(mg/L>
KQ61 (Low and High Zinc Subcategories)
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Zinc
_
-•
-
-
'
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.1
0.055
7.6
0.014
0.19
0.33
037
0.009
5.0
0.16
030
0.078
53
—
.
.
_
.
_
—
•
-
.
_
_
.
-
2.1
5.0
7.6
0.014
0.19
0.86
037
0.009b
0.20°
0.025"
5.0
0.16
030
0.078
53
K062 (Treatment Standards Based on Stabilization)
Chromium (total)
Lead
_'
-
0.094
037
••
- •
0.86
0.37
NRJ-073
0629-Olnrj
ES-43
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
Regulated Hazardous
I C^
——====
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total
(ing/kg)
TCLP
Cmg/L>
=;== - =
Revised
Gtanrfjii*
Application
: :•-"•'••,•*:;'. stsa
Total
1 K062 (Alternative Treatment Standards Based OB HTMR)
| Antimony
I Arsenic
I Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Zinc
-
2.1
0.055
7.6
0.014
0.19
033
037
0.009
5.0
0.16
0.30
0.078
5.3
-
2.1
5.0
7.6
0.014 |
0.19
0.86
037
0.009"
0.206
0.025d
5.0
0.16
030
0.078
53
KCXJ9 (Calcium Sulfate Subcategoiy)
Cadmium
Lead
-
0.14
0.24
, -
I ' ' K071
Mercury
-
0.20"
0.025C
! K073
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chloroform •
Hexachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
6.2
6.2
30
6.2
6.2
- •
6.0
6.0
30
6.0
6.0
0.19
0.37
0.20"
0.025C
;
NRJ-073
0629-Olnij
ES-44
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
Regulated Hazardous
•;:;':::::i;s|i:;;;--:.€6nsl3toents.
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total
(mg/kg)
TCLP
{mg/L)
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal
Standards
Total
(rag/kg)
TCLP
(mg/L)
K083
Aniline
Benzene
Sum of Diphenylamine and
Diphenylnitrosamine
Nitrobenzene
Phenol
Nickel
14
6.6
14
14
5.6
-
—
.
_
•_
_
0.088
14
10
13«
14
6.2
—
—
.
5.0
K084. .,, :. ,-'™:'.,,., ::-,,,,,,.X,.,...',.
Arsenic
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
o-Dichlorobenzene
m-Dichlorobenzene
p-Dichlorobenzene
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorobenzerie
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenze.ne
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
Total PCBs
-
5.6
.
5.0
K085
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
0.92
0.92'
0.92
0.92
0.92
1.8
1.8
NR
—
.
_
. •"
_
_
_
_
.
_
_
.
.
.
-
_
-
io
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
10
10
14
19
NRe
'NRe
NRe
NRe
• NR*
. NRe •
NRe
108
_
—
_
—
—
—
_ .
_
»
_
_
.
.
.
.
-
NRI-073
0629-02.nrj
ES-45
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
Regulated Hazardous
Constituents
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total
(mg/kg)
TCLP
(mg/L)
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal
Standards
Total
{mg/kg)
TCLP
(mg/L)
K086
Acetone
Acetophenone
Butanol (n-Butyl Alcohol)
Butyl Benzyl Phthalate
o-Dichlorobenzene
Diethyl Phthalate
Dimethyl Phthalate
Di-n-butyl Phthalate
Di-n-octyl Phthalate
Ethyl Acetate
Ethyl -Benzene
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
Methylene Chloride
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
Toluene
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Trichloroe'thylene
Xylenes (total)
Cyanides (total)
Chromium (total)
Lead
160
9.7 ,
2.6
7.9
6.2
28
28
28
28
33
6.0
28
36
33
33
3.1
14
28
5.6
5.6
28
1.5
-
-
_
-
-
-
-
-
_
'
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
.
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.094
0.37
160
9.7
2.6
28
6.0
28
28
28
28
33
10
28
36
33
30
5.6
14
10
6.0
6.0
30
DE
-
-
_
"-
-
, -
-
-
• -
'-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
.
-
-
0.86
0.37
NRJ-073
0629-02.ni]
ES-46
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
Regulated Hazardous
'•"•^"•.^•'••Gaiistftwtttt
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total
(mg/kg)
TCLP
{mg/L>
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal
Standards
Total
^' •- •
Phthalic Anhydride (as
measured by Phthalic Acid)
28
-
28
T
K094
Phthalic Anhydride (as
measured by Phthalic Acid)
Hexachloroethane
Pentachloroe thane
1,1,1 ,2-Tetrachloroethane
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
28
-
28
.
K095
28
5.6
5.6
5.6
6.0
6.0
5.6
-
30
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
.
NRJ-073
0629-02.nij
ES-47
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
I
• . ..
Regulated Hazardous
Constituents '* SvV
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total
(mg/kg)
TCLP
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal
Standards
Total
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
Regulated Hazardous
Constituents
»
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total
(mg/kg)
TCLP
{mg/L)
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal
Standards
. Total
(mg/kg)
TCLP
K101
o-Nitroaniline
Arsenic
14
•
_
5.6
14
-
—
5.6
.. .,:.,,«,::,,;,., - ^^
o-Nitrophenol
Arsenic
13
5.6
13
5.6
K103 "' ' '••' -^^-; "--, •"; ::'
Aniline
Benzene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
Nitrobenzene
.Phenol
5.6
6.0
5.6
5.6
5.6
—
-
-
-
14
10
160
14
6.2
—
_
-
-
K104
Aniline
Benzene
2,4-Dinitrophenol
Nitrobenzene
Phenol
Cyanides (total)
5.6
6.0
5.6
5.6
5.6
1.8
—
-
.
.
. -
14
10
160
14
6.2
DE
_
_
-
_
-
K105
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
2-Chlorophenol
o-Dichlorobenzene
p-Dichlorobenzene
Phenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
.
_
-
-
-
10
6.0
5.7
6.0
6.0
•6.2
7.4
7.4
_
'
-
-
•
K106 (Low Mercury Subcategory-RMERC Residues)
Mercury
-
0.20
'-
0.20
NRI-073
0629-02.nrj
ES-49
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal
Standards
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Regulated Hazardous
Constituents .
Total
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
Regulated Hazardous
Constituents
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total
(mg/kg)
TOP
{mg/L>
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal
; Standards
Total
TCLP
Oag/L)
P010
Arsenic
-
5.6
-
5.0
IHttl „ ,
Arsenic
-
5.6
-
5.0
P012
Arsenic
- •
5.6
'
5.0
p
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
I '
Regulated Hazardous
- - ' ...'-• ^ . Gonstftuea^SSii 111
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
,.;ift Total
. TCLP
Standard from the
Application of Universal
Standards
Total
TCLP
I1—- '' ' •••.."•••-'••-'••'••'• •.--'"':•: W&6 J" ~- ^;': £;,.•:.•., v -.;;., ,••:_: .-•*•
Arsenic
'
5.6
-
5.0
.••-;- . .-.-• •-, ;• P037 ' , :*-:-.
Dieldrin
0.13
-
0.13
.
P038
Arsenic
-
5.6
-
5.0 j
P03* ... , , 1
Disulfoton
0.1
-
62
H
• .. •--' ••-':-.:^^Kf^.v<-,r-^ - P047 ; ,,x'^_,,.
j 4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
160
-
160
.
1 P048
1 2,4-Dinitrophenol
160
-
160
•, .
| P050
Endosulfan I
Endosulfan H
1 Endosulfan Sulfate
0.066
0.13
0.13
-
0.066
0.13
0.13
-
' ' P051
Endrin
Endrin Aldehyde
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
•
. P059
Heptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
0.066
0.066
•
0.066
0.066
-
P060
Isodrin
0.066
-
0.066
-
NRJ-073
ES-52
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
Regulated Hazardous
Constituents
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total
Ca*g/fc#
TCLP
s==!==========ss=s=
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal
Standards
Total
(lag/fcg
P063
Cyanides (total)
Cyanides (amenable)
110
9.1
:
DE
DE
TCLP
(mg/L>
-
P065 (Low Mercury Sobcategory - RMERC Residues)
Mercury
•
0.20
-
PQ6S (Low Mercury Subcategory - rncinerator Residues)
Mercury
-
0.025
.
0.20
0.025
P071 : >^ m^^'^m^:'- •'•-. ; -...:.-•-
Methyl Parathion
0.1
-
4.6
1- ' -— ••- • P073
Nickel
-
0.32
.
P074
Nickel
Cyanides (total)
Cyanides (amenable)
110
9.1
032
DE
DE
_
5.0
5.0
P077
1 p-Nitroaniline
28
-
.28
_
P084
Parathion
0.1
•
4.6
.
P089
(' Parathion
'0.1
• -
4.6
1 P092 (Low Mercury Subcategory - RMERC Residues)
[ Mercury
-
0.20
-
_
0.20
NRJ-073
0629-02.nrj
ES-53
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
V
Regulated Hazardous
Constituent* " "'- \
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total vl
(mg/kg)
TCLP
(mg/L)
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal
Standards
Total
(mg/kg>
TCLP
(fflg/L)
P092 (Low Mercury Subcategory - Incinerator Residues)
Mercury
-
0.025
-
0.025
•-. . .,:.;,; ; ,, , ,,«s^" p<#4_;~._, ->'-'/ ' ;
Phorate
Famphur
0.1
/•v;v,,,-'r -I.;., J, DAO^
0.1
-
4.6
'
; ^AA f _ ff ; . ^ .;,
-
15
-
.-,.:.'. , - , P09S ~- - , ^' '" '>
Cyanides (total)
Cyanides (amenable)
110
9.1
'
DE
DE
•»
,,.,-., -.•-. •-.-- ^-^r.-u '-jp^ . , _
Silver
Cyanides (total)
Cyanides (amenable
110
9.1
0.072
DE
DE
0.30
P101 ;,v,;:.^..^\^^,f:>:^,-.-:--- '::'•. ' ' •
Ethyl Cyanide
(Propanenitrile) . •
360
- •
360
-
P103
Selenium
- •
5.7
•
0.16
P104
Silver
Cyanides (total)
Cyanides (amenable)
110
.9.1
0.072
DE
DE
0.30
P106
Cyanides (total)
Cyanides (amenable)
110
9.1
. -
DE
DE
-
NRJ-073
0629-OZnrj
ES-54
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
Regulated Hazardous ,
Constituents
Previous]; Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total
(rag/kg)
TCLP
Cttg/L^
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal
Standards
Total
P110
Lead
-
0.51
-
0.37
P114
Selenium
-
5.7
-
0.16
' • -•. ^-:-'^^«:'::..F12t - ' - • •*-• -, • ... .
Cyanides (total).
Cyanides (amenable)
110
9.1
PI22
Toxaphene
13
- -
DE
DE
.• '.'.'.:'.. •• »-:''?V'-y.. •'••s'-'-SZsW'.} •.':.,?•.. : '::. --•:';' .:
t ... • ' ."• •":•,, ..- -. .: .- ... • ,;. . -,
- -
2.6
'
••.- ,;...;;;•- A--^ ••••;;;-
-
U002
Acetone
160
-
160
-
U004 ••-'••••;^?i'^l^-^":.. V '
Acetophenone
9.7
-
9.7
.
U005
2-Acetylaminofluorene
140
-
140
..
TJ009
Acrylonitrile
84
-
84
-
U012
Aniline
14
'
14
-
U018
Benz(a)anthracene
8.2
-
3.4
-
U019
Benzene
36
-•
10
-
NRJ-073
0629-02.nrj
ES-55
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
1 Regulated Hazardous
Constituent*
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total
Cfflg/k$
TCLP
(mg/L)
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal J
Standards ||
Total
&*&*&
TCLP
. ,. ' \ .* U022 -, '
Benzo(a)pyrene
8.2
-
3.4
_
1- ' . ' - - ' * U«24
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
7.2
• ^ v,-::V.V.-|JQ2j
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
7.2
, TT4W'
'; .-"'• - UOZ
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
12
-
7.2
t .;:••,•:* .•.v.i&'fe.JJ^i'.xv. '. .-V:^ .,'• .^i.i'- .'-'
5- • • ; •' •• •' ' ' TJ'..v::'-:-v.-.'.;-'::ft:..;: :•• f -? -iJJATr;. : • ;:.;•• ;••;:. :•• ' ••
-
6.0
_
.
i. ' . - - '••:'--..'•
-
12
.
- '•• • --^K^ • •••• -r:ev •'«v'"U028 "-- - |
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
28
-
28
1 U029 • .-..-•
Bromomethane (Methyl
[ Bromide)
15
-
15
-
! • . uo3o ' • •• ' -'";-;.'v :
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether
15
-
15
U031
n-Butyl Alcohol
2.6
-
2.6
.
U032
Chromium (total)
-
0.094
-
0.86
U036
Chlordane (alpha and
gamma)
0.13
•
0.26
-
U037
Chlorobenzene v
5.7
-
6.0
'
JRJ-073
629-02.no ES-56
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
Regulated Hazardous
Constituents
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total
{»g/kg*
TCLP
{mg/L)
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal
Standards
Total
{m&feg*
TCLP
i^g/i£::*;r
U039
p-Chloro-m-cresol
14
-
14
.
\ ,- U043
Vinyl Chloride
33
-
6.0
.
U044
Chloroform
5.6
-
6.0
_
U045
Chloromethane (Methyl
Chloride)
33
-
30
-
•"' :-f:'v/"T!V: ": U047 '"'•'-
2-Chloronaphthalene
5.6
-
5.6
.
U048
2-Chlorophenol
5.7
-
5.7
'
U050
Chrysene
8.2
-
3.4
.
U051
Naphthalene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Toluene
Xylenes (total)
Lead
1.5
7.4
1.5
1.5
28
.33
0.51
5.6
7.4
5.6
8,2
10
30
0.37
U052
Cresol (m- and p- isomers)
o-Cresol
3.2
5.6
.
5.6
5.6
-
NRJ-073
0629-02.nrj
ES-57
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
. Regulated Hazardous
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total
(mg/kg)
TCLP
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal
Standards
Total
TCLP
|.-:V- .---•> -. UOflT '"'Cr , ' - ..;.',.:••
o,p'-DDD
p,p'-DDD
0.087
0.087
;
0.087
0.087
-
..,.., ......,,,,, ,,,.>, , ^^ -^ ^ -,
o,p'-DDD
p.p'-DDD
o,p'-DDE
p,p'-DDE
o,p'-DDT
p,p'-DDT
0.087
0.087
0.087
0.087
0.087
0.087
-
0.087
0.087
0.087
0.087
0.087
0.087
-
- . •-., -™ ,^4,.M?:v:^';V '•• ,•.'**;,. UO
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
Regulated Hazardous
Constituent*
Previously Promulgated
l^eatment Standard
Total
(mg/kg)
TCLP
ifflg/L)
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal
Standards
Total
<*»8/*g>
TCLP
(mg/L>
U072
p-Dichlorobenzene
6.2
- ,
6.0
-
•,..-•;. - - U075 ,
Dichlorodifluoromethane
7.2
-
.7.2
. -
' •' : ••--—- -IJ07tf '. - -
1, 1-Dichloroethane
7.2
-
6.0
. - .
U077
1,2-Dichlorpethane
12
-
6.0
-
U07S
1, 1-Dichloroethylene
33
-
6.0
U079
trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene
33
-.
30
-
• • "" ' '•• U080 . ' . -•" .:-X'^(. •'•••':•;.'• :
Methylene Chloride
33
'
30.
-
U081
2.4-Dichlorophenol
14
-
14
-.
U082
2,6-Dichlorophenol
14
-
.14
-
U083
1,2-Dichloropropane
18
-
18
-
U084
cis-l,3-Dichloropropylene
trans- 1 ,3-Dichloropropylene
18
18
-•
18
18
-
NRJ-073
0629-02.ni]
ES-59
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
Regulated Hazardous
Constituents
Previously Promulgated
: Treatment Standard
Total
(mg/^)
TCLP
Cjng/L>
Revised Treatment j
Standard from the
Application of Universal j
Standards
Total
, U08*
Diethyl phthalate
28
-
28
TCLP
*
_
1- - ; / -^ ;ui0i , ,-, — ..- ;; v , -
2,4-Dimethylphenol
14
•-
14
.
^^••- IJll»y>."^ . "...
Dimethyl phthalate
28
28
.
' :>::,.— U10S ' ' - ', * , "
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
140
-
- •"••^••^'^•'..^x^?^^^^ ' :
j 2,6-Dinitrotoluene
28
140
- • _
'
' ;• ' r
28
•
1 U107 ' .
J Di-n-octyl phthalate
28
-
28
.
1 U108 • .-.-..•.••,. .-•••••'.-• = •
| 1,4-Dioxane
170
.
170
_
Ulll
| Di-n-propylnitrosamine
14
- •
14
.
U112
Ethyl Acetate
' 33
-
33
_
U117
Ethyl Ether
160-
'
160
U118" - |
Ethyl Methacrylate
160
-
160
-
NRJ-073
ES-60
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
Regulated Hazardous
Constituents
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total
{mg/kg}
TCLP
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal
Standards
Total
0ag/*g>
TCLP
v;(rag/E>:--,:
U120
Fluoranthene
8.2
,
3.4
.
U121
Trichloromonofluorometbane
33
U12'
Hexachlorobenzene
37
-
30
f-f - •:••• .. •,,:-:•:• .V^.':,::'- , ' ... '.
t ••'• •-:"••••••• -x->V. : •••:•'•• ••••: : .:'• •. ;••
-
10
.
_
- ' -: ' U128 -. -j^r---- •
Hexachlorobutadiene
28
-
5.6
-
• •- '• •. . :.:... -•,„**;:. ••^•?4z-~. IH» - .-•-.,:.. -i,.
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
0.066
0.066
0.066
0.066
-
0.066
0.066
0.066
0.066
• -
U130 • -- : • ' •"•:••-/;,.-.•.. :
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
3.6
-
2.4
.
U131
Hexachloroethane
28
-
30
-
U136
Arsenic
-
5.6
_ i
5.0
U137
Indeno( l,2,3-c,d)pyrene
8.2
.
3.4
-
U138
lodomethane
65
'
65
• -
NRJ-073
0629-02.nrj
ES-61
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
1 • .
Regulated Hazardous
1 Constiteent*
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total
(mg/Icg)
TCLP
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
Regulated Hazardous
Constituents
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total
(mg/*g)
TOP
Cmg/L)
Revised Treatment I
Standard from the
Application of Universal
Standards
Total
TCLP
(mg/t)
U158
4,4'-Methylene-bis-
(2-chloroaniline)
35
-
3
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
1
. Regulated. Hazardous
Cbnstftuent* ; ,
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total
TCLP
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal
Standards
Total
.. .,.,-.;,,,. ^,.v... •;,-..•• .. Ul«8 ,, , * , , 77|
Phenol
6.2
- -
6.2
U190
Phthalic Anhydride
28
-
28
U192
Pronamide :
1.5
-
1.5
U196
1 Pyridine
16
;
16
«.
—
*
-
1 U203 -1
I Safrole
22
-
22
j , U204
fi Selenium
'-
5.7
_
0.16
I U20S 1
1 Selenium
-
5.7.
•
,0.16
* , * - _,
NRM73 • v
0629-02.no' . ES-64
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
Regulated Hazardous
Constituents
Previously Promulgated
Treatment Standard
Total
(«g/kg)
TCLP
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal
^ Standards j
Total
(mg/kg)
TCLP I
m&ttg/tb? ,. J
U207
l*,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
19
-
14
,
' •••-••••- '• ••••-••m:itii;m,:l}28& , , ,,-,,;, ...
1, 1, 1,2-Tetrachloroethane
42
.
6.0
_
••-'••••••••-• U209 - .., , . . • . •
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
42
- -
6.0
_
- U210 ' ..v; ,:,..-.
Tetrachloroethylene
- 5.6
-
6.0
.
U211 . I
Carbon Tetrachloride
5.6
•
6.0
1
U220
1 Toluene
28
-
10
_
U225 '•:. •:•••
Bromoforfn
(Tribromoethane)
15
-
15
-
U226
1,
1 . 1 -Trichloroethane
5.6
-
6.0
• • -
U227
1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
. 5.6
-
6.0
. -
U228
Trichloroethvlene
5.6
6.0
U235
tris(2,3-Dibromopropyl)-
phosphate
0.10
0.10
NRJ-073
ES-65
-------
Table ES-3
(Continued)
Regulated Hazardous
Constituents
Previously I
Treatment
Total
(mg/k#
promulgated
'Standard
TCLP
(flig/L)
Revised Treatment
Standard from the
Application of Universal
Standards
Total
(nig/kg) :
TCLP
(mg/L)
'..••'•; . U239 , _
Xylenes (total)
28
-
30
•
U240 , ,
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic
Acid (2,4-D)
10
-
10
-'
• :. , U243 , , . ...' ,'. .
Hexachloropropene
28
-
30
.
' ' . .•-"• ••' U247 * ' " ' . . "' • :'
Methoxychlor
0.18
-
0.18
This treatment standard is applicable if the only listed hazardous constituents in the waste are carbon
disulfide, cydohexanone, or methanol. If a waste contains any of these constituents in addition to any of the
other 26 constituents regulated in P001-F005 using treatment standards based on total constituent analysis,
the TCLP analysis need not be performed.
kHigh-mercury subcategory wastes (Listed wastes with mercury concentrations _>. 260 mg/kg). '
•Low-mercury subcategory wastes - RMERC residues.
'Low-mercury subcategory wastes - non-RMERC residues.
The Agency is regulating PCBs (i.e., Aroclors) under universal standards in nonwastewater forms of wastes
as total PCBs based on the sum of the individual Aroclors.
This value represents the sum of benzo(b)fluoranthene and benzo(k)fJuoranthene.
'This value represents the sum of diphenylamine and diphenylnitrosamine.
DE = Discussed Elsewhere
NR « Not Regulated
NRJ-073
0629-02,nrj
ES-66
-------
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or the Agency)
is establishing Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAT) universal treatment
standards for listed hazardous wastes identified in Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 26131 (40 CFR 26131). These BDAT treatment standards are being established
in accordance with the amendments to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA) of 1976, enacted by the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of
November 8, 1984.
A universal standard is a single treatment standard established for a
specific constituent independent of the waste matrix. These universal standards will
replace most of the previous BDAT treatment standards for constituents regulated in
waste eodes listed under the RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions Program (as discussed in
Section 2.0 and presented in Table ES-3). In addition, these universal standards may be'
used in the future to promulgate treatment standards for the constituents of concern in
newly listed hazardous wastes.
This background document provides the Agency's rationale and technical
support for developing the universal treatment standards. This document also provides
the Agency's application of universal standards and the general provisions for
incorporating these standards into previously promulgated listed hazardous wastes, and
wastes that may be listed as hazardous at a future date.
The Agency's legal authority and promulgated methodology for establishing
treatment standards and the petition process necessary for requesting a variance from the
treatment standards are summarized in EPA's Final Best Demonstrated Available
Technology (BDAT) Background Document for Quality Assurance/Quality Control
Procedures and Methodology (Methodology Background Document) (3). Section 1.1 of
this document provides a discussion of the regulatory background for universal standards.
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj
-------
Section 1.2 of this document presents a brief explanation of universal standards and their
application; a more in-depth discussion is included in Section 2.2 of this document.
Section 13 presents a brief summary of the contents of this document.
!•! Regulatory Background
Section 3004(m) of RCRA, as amended by HSWA, requires the Agency to
promulgate treatment standards restricting the land disposal of hazardous wastes based
on the application of BDAT for treatment of those wastes. HSWA set a strict and
detailed schedule for establishing treatment standards, based on priorities related to the
volume of waste generated and intrinsic hazards of different types of wastes.
In response to these requirements, the Agency promulgated six regulations
corresponding to six different groups of wastes. The six groups and the respective dates
for promulgation of treatment standards for these groups are listed below:
Solvent and dioxin wastes November 7, 1986
"California List" wastes July 8, 1987
"First Third" wastes August 8, 1988
"Second Third" wastes June 8, 1989
Third Third" wastes May 8, 1990
"Phase I" wastes . November 16, 1992
Generally, treatment standards are specified for both the wastewater and
nonwastewater forms of each listed hazardous waste. These standards are applicable to
the listed wastes as well as to any wastes generated by the management or treatment of
the listed wastes. For the purpose of determining the applicability of treatment
standards, wastewaters are defined as wastes containing less than 1% (weight basis) total
suspended solids2 and less than 1% (weight basis) total organic carbon (TOC). Wastes
-The term "total suspended solids" (TSS) clarifies EPA's previously used terminology of "total solids" and
iilterable sobds." Specifically, total suspended solids are measured by Method 209C (total suspended solids
dried at 103 to 105°C) in Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (1).
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj
-------
not meeting the wastewater definition must comply with treatment standards for
nonwastewaters.
Under the existing promulgated rules, facilities that land dispose organic-
and metal-containing wastes must typically comply with individual treatment standards
for a specific waste; in some instances, these treatment standards impose different
concentration limits for the same constituent in different wastes. Section 2002(b) of
RCRA authorizes the Administrator to revise, if necessary, at least every three years,
each regulation promulgated under HSWA. Section 3004(m)(l) of RCRA likewise
directs EPA to revise existing treatment standards as appropriate. As a result of this
authority and the desire for a simplified regulatory framework, EPA is establishing
regulations that would revise treatment standards and/or reduce administrative
requirements.
The Agency is establishing universal standards for organic, metal, and
inorganic constituents: one set of treatment standards for wastewater forms of listed
hazardous wastes and one set of treatment standards for nonwastewater forms of listed
hazardous wastes. The Agency's rationale and technical support for establishing
universal treatment standards for cyanide is provided in a separate document.
EPA published an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) for
universal standards and solicited comment on the advantages and disadvantages of the
establishment of universal standards in the May 30, 1991 Federal Register (56 FR
24444). Commenters to the May 30, 1991 ANPRM generally supported the concept of
the establishment of a universal set of BOAT treatment standards. The commenters
agreed that universal standards could substantially simplify compliance and monitoring
efforts, which were characterized as "complex and confusing."
NRJ-073
0629-01.njj
-------
12 Description of Universal Standards
\
A universal standard is a single treatment standard value for a specific
constituent; a constituent has the same universal treatment standard in each and every
waste code in which it is regulated. The Agency is establishing two different sets of
universal standards: one for nonwastewater forms of wastes and another for wastewater
forms of wastes. These two sets of treatment standards differ in the population of
regulated constituents and the concentration values of the individual universal standards.
When promulgated, these standards will replace most of the previously promulgated
treatment standards for listed hazardous wastes and will be used as the treatment
standards for listed hazardous wastes in the future.
Under universal standards, enforcement and compliance monitoring are
simplified. Under the existing individual concentration-based treatment standards, the
applicable standards vary between different wastes; however, under universal standards,
the applicable concentrations (i.e., standards) are limited to those found in universal
standards. Therefore, regulatory efforts are simplified since a regulated constituent .will
have the same treatment standard regardless of the waste code in which-it is regulated.
This "approach is consistent with the fact that many wastes that are treatable by similar
technologies are often appropriately commingled prior to treatment. The establishment
of universal standards is not intended to modify current restrictions on the commingling
of incompatible wastes, impermissible switching of treatability groups, or impermissible
dilution.
13 Contents of This Document
This background document provides the Agency's rationale and technical
support for identifying constituents for regulation and for developing the universal.
standards for nonwastewater forms of listed hazardous wastes. The universal standards
for wastewater forms of listed hazardous wastes are similar to the treatment standards
NRJ'073
0629-01.nij
-------
for wastewater forms of listed hazardous wastes are similar to the treatment standards
for wastewater forms of F039 wastes, with a few exceptions. The Agency's rationale and
technical support for establishing universal standards for wastewater forms of wastes is
provided hi Volume B of this set, EPA's Final Best Demonstrated Available Technology
(BOAT) Background Document for Universal Standards. Volume B: Universal
Standards for Wastewater Forms of T.isteH Hazardous Wastes (2).
Section 2.0 presents a description of universal standards and how they will
apply to previously promulgated listed hazardous wastes and wastes that may be listed as
hazardous in the future. Additionally, this section includes an explanation of waste codes
excluded from consideration under universal standards and the advantages of
implementing a system of universal standards. Section 3.0 discusses the Agency's
rationale for selecting constituents for regulation. The constituents selected for
regulation in universal standards were determined based on an evaluation of the
constituents for which nonwastewater treatment standards were previously promulgated
in the RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions Program. Section 4.0 discusses the treatment
technologies that are applicable and demonstrated for treatment of constituents in
nonwastewater forms of listed hazardous wastes. This section also presents EPA's
rationale for identifying BDAT for the constituents selected for regulation. Section 5.0
presents the treatment performance database the Agency used to determine BDAT, to
select constituents for regulation, and to develop treatment standards, for the constituents
selected for regulation in universal standards for nonwastewater forms of listed
hazardous wastes. Section 6.0 presents the development of the universal treatment
standards for the organic and metal constituents selected for regulation in nonwastewater
forms of listed hazardous wastes. Sections 7.0 and 8.0 present acknowledgments and"
references, respectively.
Tables lrl and 1-2 are cross-reference guides to this document, and list
page numbers in this document, for organic and metal constituents, respectively, for
discussions on selection of constituents for regulation, selection of BDAT, treatment
NRJ-073
0629-01.nij
-------
performance data, and calculation of universal standards for each constituent. All tables
and figures are located at the end of each section. References used in preparation of
this background document are cited throughout this document within parentheses (e g
(1)).
NRJ-073
0629-01.nq
-------
Table 1-1
Cross-Reference Guide for Organic Constituents
Constituent
Acenaphthalene
Acenaphthene
Acetone
Acetonitrile
Acetophenone
2-Acetylaminofluorene
Acrylamide
Acrylonitrile
Aldrin •
Aniline
Anthracene
Benz(a)anthracene
Benzal Chloride
Benzene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(ghi)perylene •
Benzo(a)pyrene
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform (Tribromomethane)
Selection
for
Regulation
-------
Table 1-1
(Continued)
Constituent
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether
Bromomethane (Methyl Bromide)
n-Butanol
Butyl Benzyl Phthalate
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol (Dinoseb)
Carbon Bisulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlordane
p-Chlofbaniline
Chlorobenzene
2-Chloro-l,3-butadiene
Chlorodibromomethane
Chloroethane
bis(2-Chlorocthoxy)methane ,
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
Chloroform
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
p-Chloro-m-cresol
Chloromethane
2-ChIoronaphthalcnc
2-Chlorophenol
3-Chloropropene
Chryscne
Cresol (m- and p-isomers)
(3-Methylphenol, .4-MethylphenoJ)
Selection
for
Regulation
(Page
number)
3-24
3-24
3-27
3-28
3-24
3-19
3-22
3-19
3-25
3-21
3-22
3-24
3-22
3-22
3-22
3-22
3-22
3-21
3-22
3-22
3-21
3-22
3-29
3-24
Sekction
of BOAT
-------
Table 1-1
(Continued)
Constituent
o-Cresol (2-Methylphenol)
Cyclohexanone
o,p'-DDD
p,p'-DDD
o,p'-DDE
p,p'-DDE
o,p'-DDT
p,p'-DDT
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
l^-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
Dibromomethane •
tris-(2,3-Dibromopropyl)phosphate
(m) 1,3-Dichlorobenzene
(o) 1,2-Dichlorobenzene
(p) 1,4-DichIorobenzene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-DichloroethyIene
trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene
2,4-DichIorophenol
2,6-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid (2,4-D)
1,2-Dichloropropane
Selection
for
Regulation
(Page
number)
3-24
3-27
3-19
3-19
3-20
3-20
3-20
3-20
3-29
3-24
3-24
3-24
3-21
3-21
3-21
3-22
3-22
3-22
3-22
3-22
3-21
3-21
3-21
3-23
Selection
of BOAT
(page
number)
4-16
4-16
4-16
4-16
4-16
4-17
4-17
4-17
4-17
4-17
4-17
4-17
4-17
4-17
4-17
4-17
4-17
4-17
4-17
4-17
4-17
4-17
4-17
4-17
Treatment
Performance
Data (page
namber)
5-26
5-33
5-11
5-11
5-12
5-12
5-12
5-12
5-38
5-28
5-28
5-28
5-17
5-17
5-17
5-21
5-21
5-21
. 5-22
5-22
5-15
5-15
5-15
5-22 .
Calculation I
of Universal 1
Standard II
(Page
numbers)
6-30,6-98
6-44,6-104
6-8,6-87
6-8,6-87
6-9,6-87
6-9,6-88
6-9,6-88
6-9,6-88
6-54, 6-109
6-34,6-99
6-34,6-99
6-34, 6-99
6-17, 6-92
6-17,6-92
6-17, 6-92
6-22, 6-95
6-22,6-95
6-23, 6-95 I
6-23, 6-95
6-24,6-95
6-14, 6-90
6-14, 6-90
6-14, 6-90
. 6-24, 6-95 1
NRJ-073
062W>l.nrj
1-9
-------
Table 1-1
(Continued)
Constituent
cis-1^3-Dichloropropene
trans-l,3-Dichloropropcnc
Dieldrin
Diethyl Phthalate
2,4-Dimethji Phenol
Dimethyl Phthalate
Di-n-butyl Phthalate
1,4-Dinitrobenzene
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-DinitrotoIuene
2,6^Dinitrotoluene
Dt-n-octyl Phthalate
1,4-Dioxane
Diphcnylamine
DiphenyLoitrosamine
Di-n-propylnitrosamine
Disulfoton
Endosulfan I
Endosulfan II
Endosulfan Sulfate
Endrin
Endrin Aldehyde
Ethyl Acetate
Selection
for
Regulation
fW
number)
3-23
3-23
3-20
3-28
3-24
3-28
3-28
3-25
3-24
3-24
3-25
3-25
3-28
3-27.
3-25
3-25
3-25
3-26
3-20
3-20
3-20
3-20
3-20
3-27
Selection
of BOAT
-------
Table 1-1
(Continued)
Constituent
Ethyl Ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Ethyl Methacrylate
Ethylbenzene
Ethylene Dibromide (1,2-Dibromoethane)
Famphur
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Heptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxide
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorabutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dibxins
Hexachlorodibenzofurans
Hexachloroethane
Hexachloropropene
Indeno(l,2,3)pyrene
lodomethane
Isobutanol
Isodrin
Isosafrole
Kepone
Methacrylonitrile
Selection
for
Regulation
-------
Table 1-1
(Continued)
A J
Constituent
Methanol
Methapyrilene
Methoxychlor
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
Methyl Methacrylate
Methyl Parathidn
3-Methylcholanthrene
Methylene Chloride
4,4'-MethyIene-bis(2-chloroaniline)
Naphthalene
o-NitroanUine (2-Nitroaniline)
p-NitroaniUne (4-Nitroaniline)
Nitrobenzene
N-Nitroso-di-n-butylamine •
N-Nitrosodiethylamine
N-Nitrosodlmethylamine
N-Nitrosomcthylethylamine
N-Nitrosomorpholinc
N-Nitrosopiperidine
N-Nitrosopvrrolidine
o-Nitrophenol (2-Nitrophenol)
p-Nitrophenpl (4-Nitrophenol)
5-Nilro-o-toluidine
Selection
for
Regulation
-------
Table 1-1
(Continued)
Constituent
Parathion
Pentachlorobenzene
Pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins
Pentachlorodibenzofurans
Pentachloroe thane
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenacetin
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Phorate
Phthalic Anhydride
Phthalic Anhydride (as measured by Phthalic
Acid)
Pronamide
Propanenitrile (Ethyl .Cyanide)
Pyrene
Pyridine
Safrole
Silvex (2,4,5-TP)
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins
Tetrachlorodibenzofurans
1, 1, 1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Selection
for
Regulation
(Page
number)
3-26
3-21
3-28
3-28
3-23
3-21
3-21
3-26
3-29
3-24
3-26
3-28
3-28
3-26
3-26
3-29
3-26
3-27
3-21
3-21
3-28
3-28
3-23
3-23
Selection
of BOAT
-------
Table 1-1
(Continued)
Constituent
Tetrachloroethylene
23,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
Toluene (Methyl Benzene)
Total PCBs
Toxaphcnc
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1^-Trichloroethane
Trichlorocthylene
Tnchloromonofluoromethane
(Fluorotrichloromethane)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol .
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyacetic Acid (2,4,5-T)
1,23-Trichloropropane
l,l,2-Trichloro-l,2,2-trifluoroethane
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene(s) (total)
Selection
for
Regulation
, &*&
somber)
3-23
3-21
3-19
3-28
3-20
3-21
3-23
3-23
3-23
3-23
3-21
3-21
3-21
3-23
3-23
3-23
3-19
Selection
of BOAT
-------
Table 1-2
Cross-Reference Guide for Metal Constituents
Constituent: :::.:;::
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
======
Selection for
Regulation
(page number}
3-30
3-30
3-30
3-30
3-30
3-30
3-30
3-30
3-30
3-30
3-30
3-30
3-30
3-30
=======
Selection of
BOAT (page
:;;x>- number}-;
4-22
4-22
4-22
4-22.
4-22
4-22
4-22
4-22
4-22 .
4-22
4-22
4-22
4-22
4-22
Treatment
Performance
Data (page
number) •'• -
5-45
5-45
5-45
5-45
5-45
5-51
5-46
5-47
5-48
5-48
5-48
5-49
5-50
5-49
Calculation of
Universal
Standard (page
6-60, 6-111
6-61, 6-111
6-61, 6-111
6-62, 6-111
6-62, 6-111
6-67, 6-111
6-62,6-112
6-63, 6-112
6-64, 6-113
6-64,6-113
6-65, 6-113
6-65, 6-113
6-66,6-113
6-65, 6-113
XRJ-073
0629-Ol.nrj
1-15
-------
-------
2.0 APPLICABILITY OF UNIVERSAL STANDARDS
In the present system of land disposal of hazardous wastes under RCRA,
waste disposers must typically comply with individual treatment standards for a specific
waste; in some instances, these treatment standards impose different concentration limits
for the same constituent in different wastes. In order to simplify and streamline the land
disposal restriction rules under 40 CFR Part 261, the Agency is establishing a set of
treatment standards in which a specific constituent would have the same concentration
limit, independent of the waste code in which the constituent is regulated. This concept
of a uniform set of treatment standards is referred to as universal treatment standards
(i.e., universal standards).
2.1 Description of Universal Standards .
Universal standards are concentration limits established for specific
constituents independent of the waste matrix; a constituent has the same treatment
standard in each waste code in which it is regulated. The Agency is establishing two
different sets of universal standards: one for nonwastewater forms of wastes, and
another for wastewater forms of wastes. In some instances, a constituent can be readily
analyzed in one waste form (e.g., wastewater) and not in the other waste form (e.g.,
nonwastewater). Similarly,, the performance of applicable and demonstrated treatment
technologies, and the analytical detection limits that can be achieved are dependent on
the sample matrix. Therefore, these two sets of treatment standards differ in the
population of regulated constituents as well as the individual universal standards. The
Agency is establishing universal standards for organic, metal, and inorganic constituents;
the universal standards will replace most existing promulgated treatment standards for
listed hazardous wastes under the RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions Program. The
treatment standards for those constituents currently regulated in a waste for which
universal standards do not exist remain the same as those previously promulgated for
those wastes. '
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nrj v ' 2-1
-------
Additionally, the Agency intends to use universal standards to develop
BDAT treatment standards for newly listed wastes. The Agency plans to first
characterize the listed hazardous waste and determine which constituents should be
regulated, in accordance with EPA's Methodology Background Document (3). The
Agency would then evaluate the universal standards for those constituents, possibly
establishing them as BDAT treatment standards for the constituents selected for
regulation.
23 Waste Codes Excluded from Universal Standards
Universal standards .will not be applicable to wastes for which the Agency
has promulgated a method of treatment as the treatment standard (40 CFR 268.42).
Table 2-1 lists these waste codes and the standards promulgated as a method of
treatment.
Although the proposed rule excluded F024 wastes from universal standards,
the final Phase n rule establishes universal standards as applicable to all D, F, K, U, and
P waste codes with previously promulgated numerical treatment standards. Universal
standards, however, do not apply to TC metal wastes (D004-D011). Treatment standards
for D004-D011 wastes remain the same as those promulgated in the Third Third final
rule (June 1, 1990). •
2.3 • Advantages of Universal Standards
The EPA is establishing universal standards because of the advantages this
type of treatment standard will provide. This section describes the advantages of
universal standards.
The primary goal of universal standards is to simplify owner and operator
compliance, as well as the Agency's enforcement efforts. Under a set of universal
NRJ-073 v
0629-Ol.nrj " 2-2
-------
standards, enforcement and compliance monitoring are simplified. Under the existing
individual concentration-based treatment standards, the applicable standards vary among
different wastes. Under universal standards, however, the treatment standards are
limited to those found in universal standards. Therefore, the establishment of universal
standards is expected to require less recordkeeping and simplify the testing required to
comply with BDAT.
Universal standards will also simplify EPA's development of BDAT
treatment standards for future wastes to be listed under 40 CFR Part 261. In most cases,
new listings of hazardous wastes will have universal standards as land disposal
restrictions.
Additionally, universal standards will facilitate the handling of waste
mixtures which are encountered at both on- and off-site hazardous waste treatment and
recovery facilities. Many wastes that are treatable by similar technologies are often
commingled prior to treatment and/or recovery; a set of universal standards would
simplify the monitoring and compliance requirements for these hazardous waste
mixtures. For example, under the present regulatory system, facilities that commingle
wastes must sometimes comply with more than one treatment standard for a specific
constituent. Under universal standards, monitoring and compliance will be simplified
since a specific constituent would have the same treatment standard in each waste code
in which it is regulated. • . ,
Finally, a universal set of standards will provide facilities with
concentration goals for individual constituents. The facilities will then have the
information necessary to develop and implement alternative treatment technologies and
to direct waste minimization investigations to reach these goals.
NRJ-073
0629-01.nij . ^ - 2-3
-------
Table 2-1
Waste Codes With Treatment Standards
Promulgated as Methods of Treatment*
F Wastes
K Wastes
P Wastes
m
•
F005 (2-Nitropropane, 2-Ethoxyethanol)
K025
K026
K027
K039 •
K045
K047
K069 (Non-Calcium Sulfate Subcategory:
Nonwastewaters)
K106 (High Mercury Subcategory:
Nonwastewaters)
K107
K108
P001
P002
POOS (Nonwastewaters)
POOS
P006
P007
POOS
P009
P014
P015
P016
P017
P018
P022 (Nonwastewaters)
P023
P026
P027
P028
P031
PQ33 .
P034
P040
P041
P042
F024fc
K109
K110
K112
K113
K114
K115*
K116
K123
K124
K125
K126
P043
P044
P045
P046
P047 (4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol salts)
P049
P054
P056 (Nonwastewaters)
P057
P058
P062
P064
P065 (Nonwastewaters that are not
residues from incineration
RMERC)
or
P065 (High Mercury Subcategory.
Nonwastewaters)
P066
P067
P068
P069
P070
P072
P075
'Unless otherwise specified, methods of treatment were specified for all regulated constituents in both
nonwastewater and wastewater forms of the waste. "
^The constituents in this waste also have concentration-based treatment standards.
NRJ-073 . '• v
0629-Ol.nrj 2-4
-------
Table 2-1
(Continued)
P Wastes
(Cont)
U Wastes
P076
P078
P081
P082 (Nonwastewaters)
P084
P085
P087
P088
P092 (Nonwastewaters that are not
residues from incineration or
RMERC)
P092 (High Mercury Subcategory:
Nonwastewaters)
P093
U001
U003 (Nonwastewaters)
U006
U007
U008
U010
U011
U014
U015
U016
U017
U020
U021
U023
U026
U033
U034
U035
U038 (Nonwastewaters)
U041
U042 (Nonwastewaters)
U046
U049
U053
U055
U056
U057 (Nonwastewaters) :
U058 '
U059
U062
P095
P096
P102
P105
P108
P109
P112
PI 13 (Nonwastewaters)
P115 (Nonwastewaters)
P116
P118
P119 (Nonwastewaters)
P120 (Nonwastewaters)
P122
U064
U073
U074
U085
U086
U087
U089
U090
U091
U092
U093 (Nonwastewaters)
U094
U095
U096
U097
U098
U099
U103
U108 (Wastewaters)
U109
U110 '.
U113 .
U114
U115
U116
U119
U122 ' -
U123 . '
U124
U125
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nrj
2-5
-------
Table 2-1
(Continued)
U Wastes
(ConL)
«
*
.
U126
U132
U133
U134 (Nonwastewaters)
UBS
U143
U147
U148
U149
U150
U151 (High Mercury Subcategory:
Nonwastewaters) .
U153
U154
U156
U160
U163
U164
U166
U167
U168 (Nonwastewaters)
U171
U173
U176
U177
U17S
U182
U184
U186
U189
U191
U193
U194
U197
U200
U201
U202
U206
U213
U214 (Nonwastewaters)
U215 (Nonwastewaters)
U216 (Nonwastewaters)
U217 (Nonwastewaters)
U218
U219
U221
U222 -
U223 •
U234
U236
U237
U238
U240 (2,4-D salts and esters)
U244
U246
U248
U249
U328
U353
U359
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj
2-6
-------
3.0 CONSTITUENTS SELECTED FOR REGULATION UNDER UNIVERSAL
STANDARDS
This section presents the Agency's methodology for selecting constituents
for regulation under universal standards and identifies the constituents selected for
regulation under universal standards for nonwastewater forms of listed hazardous wastes.
3.1 Constituents Considered for Regulation
The Agency created a population of constituents to be considered for
regulation under universal standards by combining the BDAT List of hazardous
constituents with other constituents regulated under the RCRA Land Disposal
Restrictions Program. This population represents all constituents that are or could be
regulated by EPA in listed hazardous wastes. Table 3-1 lists constituents considered for
regulation under universal standards. Organic and metal constituents are discussed
separately in this section. ! " '
3.1.1 Organic Constituents
For the purposes of a preliminary attempt to consider constituent chemistry
in the development of universal standards, EPA divided the list of organic constituents
considered for regulation under universal standards into fourteen treatability groups
based on similarities in elemental composition and functional groups. The classification
of constituents into the treatability groups presented in this section is one of several
groupings EPA is considering. EPA reserves the right to modify these groups and to
adjust constituent classifications in future rulemakings, which may use these groups as
the basis for adjusting individual standards or for designating certain constituents as
representative of their group. •
NRJ-073 v
0629-01.nrj 3-1.
-------
Constituents were organized in treatability groups because the Agency
expected constituents within each group to behave similarly when treated by an
applicable technology, constituents within each group are generally analyzed using the
same analytical methods, have similar detection levels, and are treated to similar
concentration levels. The fourteen treatability groups are:
Aromatic Hydrocarbons;
Carbon Bisulfide;
Chlorinated Pesticides;
Chlorinated Phenolics and Derivatives;
Chlorobenzenes;
Halogenated Volatiles;
Non-Chlorinated Phenolics;
Organo-Bromines;
Organo-Nitrogen Compounds;
Organo-Sulfur Pesticides;
Oxygenated Hydrocarbons;
PCBs and Dioxms;
Phthalates; and
Polynudear Aromatic Hydrocarbons.
Table 3-1 presents the individual organic constituents within each treatability group. The
Agency's criteria for determining a constituent's treatability group are presented below.
Aromatic Hydrocarbons
The constituents in this treatability group contain an aromatic ring and
only the elements carbon and hydrogen.
Carbon Bisulfide
This constituent contains sulfur and is non-halogenated. Since carbon
disulfide is not classified as an organp-sulfur pesticide, this constituent is included in its
own treatability group. " .
NRJ-073 • v
0629-OI.nij 3-2
-------
Chlorinated Pesticides
The constituents in this treatability group include the following general
chemical structures: chlorinated norbornane or norbornene derivatives, chlorinated
biphenyls, gamma-BHC, and hexachlorobutadiene. Most of these wastes are generated
in the pesticides and agricultural chemicals industries.
Chlorinated Phenolics and Derivatives
The constituents in this treatability group include chlorinated phenols and
chlorophenoxycarboxylic acids and their derivatives. AU constituents in this group
contain an aromatic ring with an oxygen-hydrogen single bond system attached. In
addition, all constituents have at least one chlorine atom attached to the aromatic ring.
Chlorobenzenes
The constituents in this treatabiliry group include chlorinated benzenes and
their derivatives. AU constituents in this group contain an aromatic ring with at least one
chlorine atom attached.
• Halogenated Volatiles
The constituents in this treatability group contain aliphatic and/or aromatic
carbon-carbon bonds. Constituents in this group also have one or more halogen atoms
substituted for hydrogen.
Non-Chlorinated Phenolics
The constituents in this treatability group include phenol, nitrophenol, and
their non-chlorinated derivatives. All constituents in this group contain an aromatic ring
NRJ-073
0629-01.nij
-------
with an oxygen-hydrogen single bond system attached. The nitrophenols also have a
nitro group (NO2) attached to the ring.
Organo-Bromines
The constituents in this treatability group include.brominated
hydrocarbons. The Agency believes that the presence of bromine in the chemical
structure may require a modified, design and carefully controlled operating procedures in
an incineration system.
\
Organo-Nitrogen Compounds
The Agency grouped all remaining non-halogenated constituents containing
nitrogen in the organo-nitrogen treatability group. The constituents in this treatability
group contain one or more of the following functional groups: nitrogenous heterocyclic
rings, amines, amides, aminated diphenyls and biphenyls, nitriles, non-phenolic nitro
compounds, and nitroso compounds.
Organo-Sulfur Pesticides
The Agency grouped all remaining non-halogenated constituents containing
sulfur in the organo-sulfur pesticides treatability group. The constituents in this
treatability group contain sulfur and are non-halogenated. Most of these wastes are
generated in the pesticide and agricultural chemical industries.
Oxygenated Hydrocarbons
The Agency grouped all remaining constituents containing oxygen in the
oxygenated hydrocarbons treatability group. This group includes alcohols, aldehydes, and
ketones.
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nq 3-4
-------
PCBs and Dioxins
The constituents in this treatability group contain two non-fused phenyl
groups with multiple chlorine substitution. This group includes PCBs, dioxins, and
furans.
Phthalates .
The constituents in this treatability group contain two carboxyl groups
attached to an aromatic ring.
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons '
The constituents in this treatability group contain at least two fused or
bridged aromatic rings with one or more substituted positions. In some cases, one of the
aromatic rings may be a heterocycle.
3.1.2 Metal Constituents
The Agency has selected the metals included on the BDAT List of
hazardous constituents as the population of metal constituents considered for regulation
under universal standards. This population represents the metal constituents that are or
could be regulated by EPA under the Land Disposal Restrictions Program. Table 3-1
lists the metal constituents considered for regulation under universal standards.
3.2 Selection of Regulated Constituents
In the selection of regulated constituents under universal standards, the
Agency followed the same constituent selection criteria found in EPA's Methodology
Background Document (3) established for the RCRA listed hazardous wastes.'
NRJ-073
0629-01.nij 3.5
-------
For the selection of regulated constituents under universal standards for
nonwastewater forms of wastes, the Agency initially considered all constituents on the
BDAT List and those other non-BDAT List constituents regulated in nonwastewater
forms of wastes applicable to universal standards for potential regulation.
In the development of previously promulgated treatment standards under
the Land Disposal Restrictions Program, for the constituent to be considered for
regulation in the waste, it must have been present or suspected of being present in the
untreated waste. From each group of constituents that were eligible for regulation, the
EPA selected a subset of constituents which represented the broader group. For
example, from a group of constituents that react similarly to treatment, the Agency
selected for regulation those constituents that (1) were the most difficult to treat, based
on waste characteristics affecting performance of treatment; (2) were representative of
other constituents in the waste, based on structural similarities; and (3) were present in
the untreated waste at the highest concentrations. The Agency selected a subset of
constituents for regulation to facilitate implementation of the compliance and
enforcement program.
All of the treatment performance data presented in Section 5.0 represent
the data used as the basis of the treatment standards for wastes regulated to date under
the Land Disposal Restrictions Program. The constituents represented by these
performance data, therefore, are either present or believed to be present in a waste
applicable to universal standards waste.. The data also indicate statistically significant
reductions in concentrations or, in the case of metals, reduction in mobility (i.e.,
leaching) resulting from treatment. Therefore, the Agency is selecting for regulation in
universal standards those constituents, from the initial population, for which
concentration-based nonwastewater treatment standards were promulgated in listed
hazardous wastes. . .
NRJ-073
0629-01.nij
-------
Constituents on the BDAT List of hazardous constituents which are not
being selected for regulation in universal standards are also presented 'in this section.
These excluded constituents may still be regulated in wastes subject to universal
standards, but no individual concentration-based treatment standard exists in this
document The treatment standards for those constituents currently regulated in a waste
for which concentration-based universal standards do not exist remain the same as those
previously promulgated for those wastes. In addition, for future rulemakings, general
provisions for developing treatment standards for those BDAT List constituents
identified as a constituent of concern in a waste, which do not have concentration-based
universal standards are presented in EPA's Methodology Background Document (3).
3.2.1 Selection of Organic Constituents for Regulation Under Universal
Standards
The Agency is regulating those organic constituents for which it has
promulgated nonwastewater BDAT treatment standards based on the performance of
incineration, fuel substitution, and sludge drying (defined in Section 4.1.1) under the
Land Disposal Restrictions Program. All the organic constituents selected for regulation
in universal standards have the potential to be in treatment residuals and effluents.
Constituents excluded from universal standards were those with analytical quantification
difficulties and those without a concentration-based treatment standard in nonwastewater
forms of wastes applicable to universal standards. Table 3-2 lists the organic constituents
selected for regulation under universal standards, as well as the excluded constituents
and reasons for exclusion. -
The Agency is regulating PCBs as a single sum (i.e., as total PCBs) in
wastewaters and in nonwastewaters rather than as individual Aroclors. Regulating total
PCBs is consistent with regulations promulgated by other EPA offices, such as those
promulgated pursuant to the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). Total PCBs
represent many isomers of polychlorinated biphenyls. The Agency believes that
NRJ-073 . . •
0629-Ol.nij ' ' 3-7
-------
regulating total PCBs may eliminate the analytical difficulties in quantifying each of the
individual Aroclbrs. Quantifying individual Aroclors requires recognition of a
chromatographic pattern specific for each Aroclor. Chromatographic patterns of
individual Aroclors often overlap, making it difficult to quantify each individual Aroclor,
but the sum of the individual Aroclors can be quantified. These patterns are often
difficult to interpret Furthermore, quantification of individual Aroclors may be difficult
in the case of wastes subject to degradation or treatment. The Agency recommends the
use of SW-846, Methods 8080 or 8081, which require the use of a gas
chromatograph/electron capture detector, for measurement of total PCBs.
The Agency is regulating benzo(b)fmoranthene and benzo(k)fluoranthene
as a sum under universal standards. The Agency recommends the use of SW-846,
Method 8270, which requires the use of a gas chromatograph (GC)/mass spectrometer,
for measurement of the concentration of these compounds. When analyzing for these
compounds using this method, these two stereo-isomers co-elute. Since the two
constituents may not be accurately quantified separately, the Agency is regulating these
constituents as a sum in nonwastewater forms of wastes. However, universal standards
are presented separately for these two constituents on Table ES-1 and in the preamble
for this rule to simplify commercially available computerized search-programs that search
by constituent name or CAS number.
Similarly, the Agency is regulating diphenylamine and diphenylnitrosamine
as a sum under universal standards. The Agency also recommends the use of SW-846,
Method 8270 for measurement of the concentration'of these compounds. During the
analysis of these compounds, diphenylnitrosamine may hydrolyze to diphenylamine.
Since the two constituents may not be accurately quantified separately, the Agency is
regulating these constituents as a sum in nonwastewater forms of wastes. However,
universal standards are presented separately for these two constituents on Table ES-1
and fn the preamble for this rule to simplify commercially available computerized search
programs that search by constituent name or CAS number.
'NRJ-073 v
0629-Ol.nrj 3_g
-------
The Agency is establishing a universal standard for benzal chloride in
nonwastewater forms of wastes. The K015 treatment standard for benzal chloride is the
only concentration-based treatment standard the Agency has promulgated to date for this
constituent in nonwastewater forms of wastes. Analytical difficulties may complicate
accurate quantification of benzal chloride in nonwastewater forms of waste. However,
because data available to the Agency indicated that benzal chloride comprises
approximately 88% of K015 wastes, the Agency chose to regulate this constituent
regardless of potential analytical difficulties. The K015 treatment standard was therefore
promulgated to ensure that the land disposal of this waste minimized the risk to human
health and environment. Likewise, the Agency is establishing a universal standard for
benzal chloride for use in regulating wastes with high concentrations of this constituent.
EPA added nonwastewater universal standards for five constituents
between proposal and promulgation: acetonitrile; acrylamide; 2-chIoro-l,3-butadiene;
and tris-(2,3-dibromopropyl) phosphate; and N-m'trosodimethylamine. The Agency is
establishing universal standards for these constituents based on the only concentration-
based treatment standard the Agency has promulgated to date for each of these
constituents in nonwastewater forms of wastes (i.e., these universal standards are being
established as "defacto" universal standards).
3.2.2 • Selection of Metal Constituents for Regulation Under Universal Standards
The Agency is regulating those metal constituents for which it has
promulgated nonwastewater BDAT treatment standards under the Land Disposal
Restrictions Program. In addition, the Agency is developing a universal standard for
vanadium based on the performance of High Temperature Metals Recovery (HTMR) (as
discussed in Section 4.2.2, HTMR was selected as BDAT for most metal constituents in
nonwastewater forms of wastes). These metal constituents represent 14 of the 16 metals
on the BDAT list of hazardous constituents and are presented in Table 3-3. Because
universal standards would apply to most listed wastes in the RCRA Land Disposal
NRJ-073 v
0629-01.nrj . ' 3-9
-------
Restrictions Program, all 14 metals have the potential to be in treatment residuals and
effluents.
Additionally, selection of these 14 metals for regulation encourages the
optimization of HTMR processes. Proper design and operation of many treatment
processes for metals can be related directly to the metals content in the effluent or
* s
leachate of residuals. One example of this relationship can be illustrated by examining
the amount of metals in the slag of a HTMR process. The partitioning of metals into
products and/or residues from HTMR depends, at least in part, upon parameters such as
the operating temperature of the various heat zones, composition of metals and other
elements in the feed, zone residence times, flow rates, and oxidation/reduction
conditions. When these factors are not optimized, the potential exists for metals to
partition into the slag rather than to the molten metal bath or the off-gas phase.
The Agency is not selecting chromium (hexavalent) and copper for
regulation under universal standards. To date, the Agency has not promulgated a
treatment standard for copper hi nonwastewater forms of wastes. Additionally, EPA is
not developing a universal standard for chromium (hexavalent) since this constituent will
be managed in universal standards by regulation as chromium (total).
3.23 Methods for the Analysis of Constituents Selected for Regulation Under
Universal Standards
Appendix A presents analytical methods recommended by EPA for
analyzing constituents selected for regulation under universal standards wastes.
Appendix A identifies each constituent selected for regulation in universal standards
wastes along with the appropriate EPA-approved measurement method, as described in
Tesr Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste. Physical/Chemical Methods: SW-846. Third
Edition (68. 69. 70).
NRJ-073 ' v
0629-Ol.nij ' 3-10
-------
Prior to the selection of analytical methods, the specific SW-846 section or
method should be consulted, as cited in Appendix A, for additional guidance on the use
of analytical methods for a specific sample.
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nrj v 3-H
-------
Table 3-1
Constituents Considered for Regulation Under Universal Standards
Organic Constituents
Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
Toluene
Xylene(s)
Carbon
Carbon disulfide
Chlorinated Pesticides
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
gamma-BHC (Lrndane)
Chlordane
Chlorobenzilate
o,p'-DDD
p,p'-DDD
o,p'-DDE
p,p'-DDE
o,p'-DDT
p,p'-DDT
Dieldrin
Endosulfan I
Endosulfan II
Endosulfan sulfate
Endrin
Endrin aldehyde
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide
Hexachlorophene
• Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Isodrin
Kepone
Methoxychlor '
Toxaphene
NRJ-073 ^
0629-Ol.nq 3-12
-------
Table 3-1
(Continued)
Chlorinated Phenolics and Derivatives
p-Chloro-m-cresol
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,6-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dichiorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D)
Pentachlorophenol
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Silvex (2,4,5-TP)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxy acetic acid (2,4,5-T)
Chlorobenzenes
Chlorobenzene
m-Dichlorobenzene
o-Dichlorobenzene
p-Dichlorobenzene
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorobenzene
Pentachloronitrobenzene
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Halogenated Volatiles
Aramite
Benzal chloride
Carbon tetrachloride
2-Chloro- 1,3-butadiene
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
Chloroform
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
Chloromethane
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nrj • 3.13
-------
Table 3-1
(Continued)
Halo senate d Volatiles (cont.)
3-ChIoropropene
2-Chloronaphthalene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
cis-l,4-Dichloro-2-butene
trans-l,4-Dichloro-2-butene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
trans-i,2-Dichloroethylene
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
trans-1,3-Diehloropropene
Hexachloroethane
Hexachloropropene
lodomethane
'Methylene chloride
4,4'-Methylene-bis(2-chloroaniline)
Pentachloroethane
. 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichlbroethylene
Trichloromonofluoromethane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
l,l,2-Trichloro-l,2,2-trifluoroethane
Vinyl chloride
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nrj V 3-14
-------
Table 3-1
(Continued)
Non-Chlorinated Phenolics
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol (Dinoseb)
m-Cresol
o-Cresol
p-Cresol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
o-Nitrophenol
p-Nitrophenol
Phenol
Resorcinol
Organo-Brnmines
Bromodichloromethane
Bromofonn (Tribromomethane)
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
Bromomethane (Methyl bromide)
Chlorodibromomethane
l,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
Dibromomethane
tris(2,3-Dibromopropyl)phosphate
Ethylene dibromide (1,2-Dibromoethane)
Organo-Nitrogen Compounds
Acetonitrile
2-Acetylaminofluorene
Acrylamide
Acrylonitrile
4-Aminobiphenyl
Aniline
p-Chloroaniline
3,3'-Dimethoxybenzidine
p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
3,3'-DimethyIbenzidine
1,4-Dinitrpbenzene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
NRJ-073
0629-01.ni] 3_ 15
-------
Table 3-1
(Continued)
Diphenylamine
l,2-DiphenyUiydrazine
Diphenylnitrosamine
Di-n-propylnitrosamine
Methapyrilene
Methacrylonitrile
1-Naphthylamine
2-Naphthylamine
5-Nitro-o-toluidine
o-Nitroaniline
p-Nitroaniline
Nitrobenzene
N-Nitroso-di-n-butylamine
N-Nitrosodiethylamine
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
N-Nitrosodimethylethylamine
N-Nitrosomorpholine
N-Nitrosopiperidine
N-Nitropyrrolidine
Phenacetin
Pronamide
Propanenitrile (Ethyl cyanide)
Pyridine
Qrgano-Sulfur Pesticides
Benzenethiol (Thiophenol)
Disulfotpn
. Famphur .
Methyl methanesulfonate
, Methyl parathion
Parathion .
Phorate
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nq v 3-16
-------
Table 3-1
(Continued)
Oxygenated Hydrocarbons
Acetone
Acetophenone
Acrolein
p-Benzoquinone
n-Butanol
Cyclohexanone
1,4-Dioxane
Ethyl acetate
Ethyl ether
Ethyl methacrylate
Ethylene oxide
Isobutanol
Isosafrole
Methanol
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methyl isobutyl ketone
Methyl methacrylate
1,4-Naphthoquinone
Safrole
PCBs and Dioxins
Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins
Hexachlorodibenzofurans
Pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins
Pentachlorodibenzofurans
Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins
Tetrachlorodibenzofiirans
2,3,7»8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
Phthalates
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Phthalic anhydride
NRJ-073
0629-0 Ijirj 3-17
-------
Table 3-1
(Continued)
Polvnuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Acenaphthalene
Acenaphthene
Anthracene
Benz(a)anthracene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Chiysene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Dibenzo(a,e)pyrene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Indeno(lA3)pyrene
3-Methylcholanthrene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Metal Constituents
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
. Chromium (total)
Chromium (hexavalent)
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium •
Vanadium
Zinc
NRJ-073
<*2!M>l.nrj 3-18
-------
Table 3-2
Organic BOAT List Constituents Regulated and Not Regulated
Under Universal Standards, by Treatability Group
\
Treatability Group
Aromatic
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Disulfidc
Chlorinated Pesticides
BOAT Ust Constituents Regulated
Under Universal Standards
Benzene
Ethylhcn/ene
Toluene
Xylenc(s)
Carbon disulfide
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
dclta-BHC
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Chlordane
o,p'-DDD
p,p'-DDD
Non-BDATList
Constituents Added to
Universal Standards
Regulation
"
.
•
BOAT Ust Constituents Not
Regulated Under Universal
Standards ,
™.
.
Chlorobenzilate
Hexachlorophene
Reason for Not
Regulating
'
_
A
A
Constituent is not selected for regulation using universal standards list because of analytical quantification difficulties. Nonwastewater BOAT
treatment standards for these constituents have, been previously promulgated as a method of treatment.
NRJ-073
0629-OJ.nrj
-------
Table 3-2
(Continued)
Treatablllty Group
Chlorinated Pesticides
(Continued)
BOAT Ust Constltueffltfl Regulated
Under Universal Standards
o,p'-DDE
p,p'-DDE
o,p'-DDT
p,p'-DDT
Dicldrin
Endosulfan I
Endosulfan II
Endosulfan sulfate
Endrin
Endrin aldehyde
Hcplachlor
Heptachlor epoxide
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Isodrin
Kepone
Methoxychlor
Toxaphene
Non-BDAT List
Constituents Added to
Universal Standards
. Regulation
BOAT List ConsUtoenfc Not
Regulated Under Universal
Standards
Reason for Not
Regulating
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nrj
-------
Table 3-2
(Continued)
Treatability Group
BOAT List Constituents Regulated
Under Universal Standards
Non-BDAT List
Constituents Added to
Universal Standards
Regulation
BOAT List Constituents Not
Regulated Under Universal
Reason for
Regulating
Chlorinated Phenolics
and Derivatives
p-Chloro-m-cresol
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,6-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D)
Pentachlorophenol
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
2,4,5-TrichlorophenoI
2,4,6:TrichlorophenoI
Silvex (2,4,5-TP)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxy acetic acid
Chlorobenzenes
Chlorobenzene
m-Dichlorobenzene
o-Dichlorobenzene
p-Dichlorobenzene
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorobenzene
Pentachloronitrobenzene
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj
-------
Table 3-2
(Contihued)
Treatabillty Group
BOAT List Constituents Regulated
Under Universal Standards
Non-BDAT List
Constituents Added to
• Universal Standards
: Regulation .
BOAT Lfot Constitoeots Not
Regulated Under Universal
:#; • Standard*? .• .•:':
Reason
Regulating
Halogcnaled Volatiles
to
Benzal chloride
Carbon tetrachloride
2-Chloro- 1,3-butadiene
Chloroethane
bis(2-Chlorocthyl)ether
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane.
Chloroform
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
Chlnromcthane
2-(.'hloronaphthalene
3-Chloropropene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
1,1 -Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
trans-l,2-Dichloroethylene
Aramite
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
3,3'-DichIorobenzidine
ds-l,4-Dichloro-2-butene
trans-l,4-Dichloro-2-butene
B
A
A
A
A
AConstituent is not selected for regulation using universal standards list because of analytical quantification difficulties. Nonwastewater BOAT
treatment standards for these constituents have been previously promulgated as a method of treatment.
"Nonwastewater BOAT treatment standards have not been promulgated in waste codes applicable to universal standards for this constituent.
NRJ-073
0629-OI.nrj
-------
Table 3-2
(Continued)
Treatability Group
BOAT List Constituents Regulated
Under Universal Standards
Non-BDAT List
Constituents Added to
Universal Standards
:* ;S Regulation
BOAT Ust Constituents Not
Regulated Under Universal
iip Standards •'- °
Reason for Not
':.;' Regulating
Halogcnated Voialiles
(Continued)
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
trans-1,3- Dichioropropene
Hexachloroethane
Hexachloropropene
lodomethane
Methylene chloride
4,4'-Methylene-bis(2-chloroaniline)
Pcntachloroethane
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tet rachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Trichloromonofluoromethane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
1, l,2-Trichloro-l,2,2-trifluoroethane
Vinyl chloride
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj
-------
Table 3-2
(Continued)
Treatability Group
BOAT List Constituents Regulated
Under Universal Standards
Non-BDAT List
Constituents Added to
Universal Standards
:- Regulation
BOAT List ConsUttKnts Not
Regulated Under Universal
'
Reason for Not
Regulating
Non-Chlorinated
Phenolics
U)
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol (Dinoseb)
m-Cresol
o-Cresol
p-Crcsol
2,4-Dimclhylphenol
4,6- Dinitro-o-cresol
2,4-DinilrophenoI
p-Nitrophenol
Phenol
o-Nitrophcnol
Rcsorcinol
Organo-Bromincs
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform (Tribromomethane).
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
Bromomethane (Methyl bromide)
Chlorodibromomethane
l,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
Dibromomethane
Ethylene dibromide (1,2-
Dibromoethane) .
tris(2,3-Dibromopropyl) phosphate
AConstituent Ls not selected for regulation using universal standards Ust because of analytical quantification difficulties. Nonwastewater BOAT
treatment standards for these constituents have been previously promulgated as a method of treatment.
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.iuj
-------
Table 3-2
(Continued)
" •• -
*
Treatabillty Group
Organo-Nitrogcn
Compounds
BOAT Ust Constituents Regulated
Under Universal Standards
Acetonilrile
2-Acetylaminoflubrene
Acrylamide
Acrylonilrilc
A *!•*
Aniline
p-Chloroaniline
1,4-Dinitrobenzene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinilrotoluenc
Diphenylamine
Diphenylnitrosamine
Di-n-propylnitrosamine
Methacrylonitrile
Methapyrilene
5-Nitro-o-toluidine
p-Nitroaniline
Nitrobenzene
N-Nltroso-di-n-butylamine
N-Nitrosodiethylamine
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
N-Nitrosodimethylethylamine
Non-BDAT Ust
Constituents Added to.
Universal Standards
Regulation
o-Nitroaniline
BOAT List Constituent Not
Regulated Under Universal
Standards
4-Aminobiphenyl
3,3-Dimethoxybenzidine
p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine
l-Naphthylamine
2-Naphthylamine
Reason for Not
Regulating
B
A
A
A
B
A
A
»
Constituent is not selected for regulation using universal standards list because of analytical quantification difficulties. Nonwastewater BOAT
treatment standards for these constituents have been previously promulgated as a method of treatment.
"Nonwastowater BDAT treatment standards have not been promulgated in waste codes applicable to universal standards for this constituent
NRJ-073
0629-01. nrj
-------
Table 3-2
(Continued)
Treatability Group
Organo-Nitrogcn
Compounds
(Continued)
Organo-Sulfur
Pesticides
BDAT List Constituents Regulated
Under Universal Standards
N-NitrosomorphoIine
N-Nitrosopiperidine,
N-Nitropyrrolidine
Phcnacetin
Pronamide
Propancnitrile (Ethyl cyanide)
Pyridine
Disulfoton '
Famphur
Methyl parathion
Parathion
Phorate
. Nom-BDAT List
Constituents Added to
Universal Standards
Regulation
BOAT List Constituents Not
Regulated Under Universal
0, Standards
Benzenethiol (Thiophenol)
Methyl methanesulfooate
Reason for Not
Regulating
A
B
N>
OS
AConstituent is not selected for regulation using universal standards list because of analytical quantiflcation difficulties. Nonwastewater BOAT
treatment standards for these constituents have been previously promulgated as a method of treatment.
"Nonwastewater BOAT treatment standards have not been promulgated in waste codes applicable to universal standards for this constituent.
NRJ-073
0629-01.nij
-------
Table 3-2
(Continued)
OJ
K)
Treatability Group
Oxygenated
Hydrocarbons
BOAT List Constituents Regulated
Under Universal Standards
Acetone
Acetophenone
h-Butanol
Cyclohexanone
1,4-Dioxane
Ethyl acetate
Ethyl ether
Ethyl mcthacrylate
Isobulanol
Isosafrole
Methanol
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methyl isobutyl ketone
Methyl methacrylate
Safrole
Non-BDAT List
Constituents Added to
Universal Standards
Regulation
•
.
BOAT List Constituents Not
Regulated Under Universal
Standards
Acrolein
p-Benzoquinone
Ethylene oxide
1,4-Naphthoquinonc
Reason for Not
Regulating
A
A
B
A
AConstitucnt is not selected for regulation using universal standards list because of analytical quantification difficulties. Nonwastewater BOAT
treatment standards for these constituents have been previously promulgated as a method of treatment.
"Nonwastewuter BOAT treatment standards have not been promulgated m waste codes applicable to universal standards for this constituent.
NRJ-073
0629-OI.nrj
-------
00
Treatability Group
PCBs and Dioxins
Table 3-2
(Continued)
Phthalatcs
BOAT List Constituents Regulated
Under Universal Standards
Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins
Hcxachlorodibenzofurans
Pcntachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins
Pcntachlorodibenzofurans
Tctrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins
Tclrachlorodibenzofurans
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Dicthyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Phthalic anhydride
Non-BDAT List
Constituents Added to
Universal Standards
= Regulation
Total PCBs
BOAT List Constituents Not
Regulated Under Universal
• Standards'
23,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-
p-dioxin
Arodor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Arodor 1232
Arodor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Arodor 1260
Reason for Not
Regulating
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
''This constituent is regulated under tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins.
"These constituents are regulated under total PCBs.
NRJ-073
0629-0 l.nrj
-------
K)
vO
Treatability Group
Polynuclear Aromatic
Hydrocarbons
Table 3-2
(Continued)
BOAT List Constituents Regulated
Under Universal Standards
Acenaphthalene
Acenaphthene
Anthracene
Bcnz(a)anthracene
Ben/o(b)fluoranlhene
Bcn/o(k)fluoranthene
Bcn/o(ghi)perylene
Ben/d(a)pyrene
Chrysene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Indeno( 1,2,3)pyrene
3-Methylcholanthrene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Non-BDAT List
Constituents Added to
Universal Standards
Regulation
BOAT List Constituents Not
Regulated Under Universal
•:;K-:, Standard! ..•"•'.
Dibenzo(a,e)pyrene
Reason for Not
Regulating
B
Constituents have never had promulgated nonwastewater BOAT treatment standards.
NRJ-073
0629-(>l.nij
-------
Table 3-3
Metal BOAT List Constituents Regulated and Not Regulated
Under Universal Standards
BOAT List Constituents Regulated
Under Universal Standards
BOAT List Constituents Not
Regulated Under Universal Standards
Reason for Not Regulating
U)
p
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Chromium (hexavalent)
Copper
A
B
"Constituent is managed by regulation as chromium (total).
The Agency has never promulgated nonwastewater BOAT treatment standards for this constituent under the Land Disposal Restrictions Program.
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nij
-------
4.0 TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR NONWASTEWATERS
This section discusses the Agency's rationale for determining Best
Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAT) for nonwastewater forms of wastes for
which EPA is establishing universal standards. The Agency has determined that BDAT
for organic constituents is incineration (rotary kiln, fluidized-bed, and liquid injection),
fuel substitution (for diphenylamine and diphenylnitrosamine), and "sludge drying" (for
disulfoton, famphur, methyl parathion, parathion, and phorate). BDAT for metal
constituents is High Temperature Metals Recovery (HTMR), vitrification (for arsenic),
stabilization (for chromium), and acid leaching (for mercury).
In determining BDAT, the Agency first determines which technologies are
potentially "applicable" for treatment of the waste(s) of interest The Agency then
determines which of the applicable technologies are "demonstrated" for treatment of the
waste(s) of interest. The next step is to determine which of the demonstrated
technologies is "best" for the purposes of establishing BDAT. Finally, the Agency
determines whether the best demonstrated technology is. "available" for treatment of the
waste(s) of interest Integral to the determination of BDAT is the evaluation of all
available treatment performance data. The treatment.performance data that were
evaluated to determine BDAT for these wastes are presented in Section 5.0.
4-* Applicable and Demonstrated Technologies
This section describes the technologies that are both applicable and
demonstrated for treatment of nonwastewater forms of listed hazardous wastes for which
EPA is establishing universal standards (hereafter referred to as universal standards
wastes). To be considered applicable, a technology must theoretically be able to treat
the waste of interest or a waste that is judged to be similar in terms of the parameters
that affect treatment selection. Detailed descriptions of applicable technologies for
treating listed hazardous wastes were obtained from EPA's Treatment Technology
VRJ-073 ^
0629-m.nrj 4_J
-------
Background Document (5). To be considered demonstrated, a technology must be in
full-scale operation for treatment of the waste of interest or a similar waste.
Technologies available only at pilot- or bench-scale operations were not considered in
identifying demonstrated technologies and, therefore, were not included in this summary.
The identification of technologies that are applicable and demonstrated for
treating universal standards wastes is based on current waste treatment practices, current
literature sources, treatment performance data from field testing, treatment performance
data submitted by equipment manufacturers and industrial concerns, and the engineering
judgement of EPA technical staff.
4.1.1 Applicable and Demonstrated Technologies for Organic Constituents
Applicable treatment technologies for organic constituents include those
that destroy or reduce the total amount of organic constituents in a waste. The
technologies listed below are applicable and have been demonstrated to treat organic
constituents in nonwastewater forms of. universal standards wastes. These technologies
are commonly used to treat wastes that contain the organic constituents regulated under
universal standards.
Fuel Substitution
Fuel substitution is a destruction technology in which heat is transferred to
a waste to destabilize chemical bonds and destroy organic constituents. Fuel substitution
involves using hazardous waste as fuel in industrial furnaces or boilers. The hazardous
waste may be blended with other nonhazardous wastes (e.g., municipal sludge) and/or
fossil fuels. Fuel substitution has been used in the treatment of industrial waste solvents,
refinery wastes, synthetic fibers/petrochemical wastes, waste oils, and wastes produced
during the manufacture of Pharmaceuticals, pulp and paper, and pesticides. Fuel
substitution generates two residuals: ash and scrubber water.
NRJ-073 v '
0629-01.nij 4-2
-------
Solvent Extraction
Solvent extraction is a separation and recovery technology that removes
organic constituents from a waste by mixing the waste with a solvent that preferentially
dissolves and removes the constituents of concern from the waste. Wastes commonly
treated by this technology have a broad range of total organic content; selection of an
appropriate solvent depends on the relative solubilities of the constituents to be removed
and the other organic compounds in the waste. Organics are removed from the waste
due to greater constituent solubility in the solvent phase than in the waste phase.
Solvent extraction generates two residuals: a treated waste residual and an extract. The
extract is often recycled or treated by incineration.
Critical Fluid Extraction
Critical fluid extraction is a separation and recovery technology in which a
solvent is brought to its critical state (liquefied gas) to extract organic constituents from a
waste. The solvents used are usually gases at ambient conditions. The solvent is then
pressurized, converting it from a gas to a liquid. As a liquid, it dissolves the organic
constituents and extracts them from the waste matrix. After the extraction, the solvent is
returned to its normal gaseous state; a small volume of extract remains that contains
high concentrations of organic constituents. This technology generates two residuals: a
treated waste residual and an extract. The extract is often recycled or treated by
incineration.
Pressure Filtration
Pressure filtration, also known as sludge filtration, sludge dewatering, or
cake-formation filtration, is a separation and recovery technology used for wastes that
contain high concentrations (> 1%) of suspended solids. Filtration separates particles
from a fluid/particle mixture by passing the fluid through a medium that permits the
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj v 4.3
-------
flow of the fluid but retains the .particles. Sludge filtration is commonly applied to waste
sludges such as clarifier sludges; typically, these sludges can be dewatered to 20 to 50%
solids concentration using this technology. Pressure filtration generates two residuals:
dewatered sludge and water.
High Temperature Thermal Distillation
High temperature thermal distillation is a separation and recovery
technology that subjects hydrocarbon-bearing wastewaters to indirect, electrically
generated heat in an inert atmosphere. The process removes all toxic volatilized
hydrocarbon constituents from a waste; the constituents can be subsequently recovered in
a reusable form by cooling the hydrocarbon-bearing inert gases at high pressure. This
process generates two residuals: a treated waste residual and an extract.
Thermal Drying of Biological Treatment Sludge
The Agency has identified the treatment train of biological treatment
followed by thermal drying of the resulting sludge (sludge drying) as an applicable and
demonstrated technology for five pesticide constituents selected for regulation in
nonwastewater forms of universal standards wastes: disulfoton, famphur, methyl
parathion, parathion, and phorate. The initial stage in the sludge drying treatment train
is> the biological treatment of the waste. The resulting treatment sludge is then
transported to a sludge thickener before it is dewatered in a filter press. The dewatered
sludge is loaded into a sludge dryer. "Sludge drying" is a destruction technology which
uses controlled flame combustion or indirect heat transfer to elevate the temperature of
the waste and, thereby, volatilize organic constituents from the waste. The Agency
believes that the definition of a "sludge dryer" limits the maximum thermal input to the
treatment system to 1,500 BTU per pound of waste treated. During the drying process,
the sludge volume is substantially reduced and the total solids content is substantially
increased. The off-gas from the dryer is sent to an afterburner to complete combustion
V
N'RJ.073
0629-Ol.nq 4-4
-------
of the dryer exhaust gas. The exhaust gas is then sent to a scrubber system for
particulate removal before being vented. This technology generates two residuals: a
treated waste residual and scrubber water.
Thermal Desorption
Thermal desorption is a separation and recovery technology in which heat
is used to volatilize organic constituents from wastes. Thermal desorption has been
defined as a thermal treatment that uses direct or indirect heat exchange to elevate the
temperature of a waste, thereby volatilizing the organic constituents. Thermal desorption
differs from thermal destruction (incineration) in the way in which the organic
constituents are treated. The objective of thermal desorption is to sufficiently elevate
the temperature of the organic constituents to effect a phase separation to a gaseous
state without combustion; the objective of incineration is to combust the organic
constituents. Thermal desorption units function by creating steam from the volatilization
of the moisture in the waste from heating. The steam tends to strip organic compounds
from the waste and aids in the volatilization of organic compounds. Generally, this
technology generates two residuals: a treated waste residual and an extract.
Total Recycle or Reuse
Total recycle or reuse of a waste within the same process or an external
process eliminates the generation of the waste and subsequently generates no treatment
residuals. •
Incineration
~: . • •«
Incineration is a destruction technology in which heat is transferred to the
waste to destabilize chemical bonds and destroy hazardous organic constituents. Three
NRJ-073
0629-01.nij v 4.5
-------
incineration technologies are applicable and demonstrated for organics in
nonwastewaters: liquid injection, rotary kiln, and fluidized-bed.
In a liquid injection incinerator, liquid wastes are atomized and injected
into the incinerator, where additional heat is supplied to destabilize chemical bonds in
the presence of air or oxygen. Once the chemical bonds are broken, these constituents
react with oxygen to form carbon dioxide and water vapor. Liquid injection is applicable
to wastes with low viscosity values, small waste particle size, and low suspended solids
content Since only wastes with low or negligible ash contents are amenable to liquid
injection incineration, this technology does not normally generate an ash residual, but
does generate a scrubber water residual.
In a rotary kiln incinerator, solid and/or semi-solid wastes are fed into the
elevated slope-end of the kiln. The rotation of the kiln mixes the waste with hot gases.
Eventually, the waste reaches its ignition temperature, and the waste is converted to gas
and ash through volatilization and combustion reactions. Ash is removed from the lower
slope-end of the kiln. Combustion gases from the kiln, containing volatilized and
partially combusted waste constituents, enter an afterburner for further combustion to
complete the destruction of the organic waste constituents. Other wastes may also be
injected into the afterburner.
In a fluidized-bed incinerator, solid and/or semi-solid wastes are injected
into a fluidized material (generally sand and/or incinerator ash), where they are heated
to their ignition temperature. In the incinerator, the waste is converted to gas and ash
through volatilization and combustion reactions. Heat energy from the combustion
reaction is then transferred back to the fluidized-bed. The velocity of the combustion
gases is reduced in a wider space above the bed, known as the "freeboard", allowing
. larger ash and unburned waste particles to fall back into the bed. Ash is removed
periodically both during operation and during bed change-outs.
NRJ-073
0629-01.nn 4-6
-------
Combustion gases from incineration are fed into a scrubber system for
cooling and removal of any entrained particles and acid gases. In general, with the
exception of liquid injection incineration, two residuals are generated by incineration
processes: ash and scrubber water.
4.L2 Applicable and Demonstrated Technologies for Metals
Applicable treatment technologies for metals include those that immobilize
or reduce the total amount of metal constituents in a waste. The technologies listed
below are applicable and have been demonstrated to treat metal constituents in
nonwastewater forms of universal standards wastes. These technologies are commonly
used to treat wastes which contain the metal constituents regulated under universal
standards. .
Stabilization
Stabilization is a broad class of treatment technologies that reduce the
mobility of metal constituents in a waste; the metals are chemically bound into a solid
matrix that resists leaching when water or a mild acid solution comes into contact with
the waste material. Organic materials usually are not stabilized effectively and may, in
fact, inhibit the stabilization of metals. Hence, stabilization is applicable to
nonwastewaters only after the organics have been removed by other treatment.
Pvrometallurgical Recovery Processes (High Temperature Metals
Recovery)
Pyrometallurgical recovery processes are those treatment technologies that
use physical and chemical reactions at elevated temperatures for extraction/ separation
of metals, ores, salts, and other materials. For the purposes of the Land Disposal
Restrictions Program, pyrometallurgical processes are referred to as High Temperature
XRJ-073
0629-Ol.nij 4.7
-------
Metals Recovery (HTMR). Some examples of HTMR systems include rotary kilns,
flame reactors, electric furnaces, plasma arc furnaces, slag reactors, and rotary
hearth/electric furnaces. These thermal reduction processes use carbon, limestone, and
silica (sand) as raw materials. The carbon acts as a reducing agent and reacts with metal
oxides in a high temperature processing unit (e.g., kiln, furnace) to produce carbon
dioxide and a free' metal This process yields a metal product for reuse and reduces the
concentration of metals in the residuals.
Hydrometallurgical Recovery Processes
Hydrometallurgical recovery processes extract and recover materials by
using acidic solutions. These processes are most effective with wastes containing high
concentrations of metals that are soluble in a, strong acid, solution or that can be
converted by reaction with a strong acid to a soluble form. Some hydrometallurgical
processes include chemical precipitation, leaching, ion exchange, solvent extraction, and
The Agency is aware that some facilities are using a series of technologies,
including chemical precipitation, ion exchange, and electrowmning, to recover metals
from various metal-bearing waste streams. Some of these facilities claim that these
hydrometallurgical processes, unlike other processes, generate no residuals for land
disposal.
Recycling
For some metal-bearing wastes, recycling may be an applicable technology.
An example is nonwastewater forms of K061 wastes, electric arc furnace dust, which may
be recycled directly back into the electric furnaces from which it was originally produced.
Such practices facilitate the recovery .of metals/in steelmaking while reducing or
eliminating the material to be land disposed.
NRJ-073 <
0629-01.nij . 4-8
-------
Identification of BOAT
The Agency determines BDAT based on a thorough review of all of the
performance data available on treatment of the waste of concern or wastes judged, to be
similar.
Section 5.0 presents the treatment performance data that were evaluated in
determining BDAT for universal standards. The treatment performance data are first
screened to determine:
• Whether the data represent operation of a well-designed and well-
operated treatment system;
• Whether sufficient analytical quality.assurance/quality control
measures were used to ensure the accuracy of the data;
• Whether the appropriate level of performance (i.e., TCLP or total
composition analysis) was used to assess the performance of the
particular treatment technology.
Following the identification of the "best" demonstrated technology, the
Agency determines whether the technology is "available." An available treatment
technology is one that (1) is not a proprietary or patented process that cannot be
purchased or licensed from the proprietor (i.e., it must be commercially available), and
(2) substantially diminishes the toxicity of the waste or substantially reduces the
likelihood of migration of hazardous constituents from the waste.
The Agency notes, however, that when it establishes concentration-based
treatment standards, the regulated community may use any non-prohibited technology to
treat the waste to meet the treatment standards. Compliance with a concentration-based
treatment standard requires only that the effluent concentration be achieved; once
achieved, the waste may be land disposed. The waste need not be treated by the
technology identified as BDAT; in fact, concentration-based treatment standards provide
*
NRJ-073
0629-01.nij - 4-9
-------
flexibility in the choice of a treatment technology. Any treatment, including recycling or
any combination of treatment technologies, unless prohibited (e.g., impermissible
dilution) or defined as land disposal (e.g., land treatment), may be used to achieve these
standards.
Tables 4-1 and 4-2 present the technologies selected as BDAT for each
organic and metal constituent, respectively, selected for regulation in nonwastewater
forms of universal standards wastes.
4.2.1 BDAT for Organic Constituents
The Agency has identified incineration as BDAT for all organic
constituents selected for regulation in nonwastewaters except for the following seven
constituents: disutfoton, famphur,-methyl parathion, parathion, phorate, diphenylamine,
and diphenylnitrosamine. All of the incineration performance data included in Section
52 represent BDAT treatment of wastes included in previous ralemakings and therefore
previously have been judged to meet the conditions listed above. Therefore, rotary kiln,
fluidized-bed, and liquid injection incineration are all "best" for treatment of these -
organic constituents in universal standards waste codes.
Incineration, is commercially available. Treatment performance data
included in Section 5.0 show substantial treatment by incineration for waste constituents
of concern and other similar constituents. Thus, incineration is "available", and therefore
BDAT for treatment of organic constituents included in universal standards wastes.
Legislative history indicates a strong preference for treatment technologies, such as
incineration, that destroy hazardous constituents. Senator Chaffee stated, introducing the
amendment that became Section 3004(m) of RCRA, "for wastes with a high organic
content, incineration should be required in lieu of land disposal" (see 130 Cong. Rec.,
S9179, daily ed. July 25, 1984).
NRJ-073 v
0629-01.mj . 4.10
-------
The Agency has identified five organic constituents (dlsulfoton, famphur,
methyl parathion, parathion, and phorate) for which sludge drying, rather than
incineration is identified as the "best" technology. The existing BDAT treatment
standards for these constituents .are based on the treatment performance of sludge
drying. These data represent treatment of the constituents of concern to the analytical
detection limits by the thermal drying of a wastewater treatment sludge generated from
the biological treatment of multi-source leachate. Because the sludge drying
performance data included in Section 5.0 represent BDAT for wastes included in
previous rulemakings, these data have been judged previously to meet the criteria for
"best" treatment technology.
The sludge drying treatment train, identified as the "best" technology for
these five organic constituents, is also commercially available. The sludge drying
treatment performance data included in Section 5.0 show substantial treatment for the
waste constituents of concern and other similar constituents. Thus, the sludge drying
treatment train is "available" and therefore is identified as BDAT for treatment of
disulfoton, famphur, methyl parathion, parathion, and phorate in universal standards
waste codes.
The Agency has identified two organic constituents (diphenylamine and
diphenylnitrosamine) for which fuel substitution, rather than incineration, is identified as
the "best" technology.. The fuel substitution treatment performance data presented in
Section 5.0 of this document represent the "best" available treatment performance data
for these constituents.
Fuel substitution, identified as the "best" technology for these two organic
constituents, is also commercially available. The fuel substitution treatment performance
data included in Section 5.0 show substantial treatment for the waste constituents of
concern and other similar constituents. Thus, fuel substitution is "available" and;
N'RJ-073
0629-01.nij
-------
therefore, is identified as BDAT for treatment of diphenylamine and
diphenylnitrosamine in universal standards.
422 BDAT for Metal Constituents
The Agency has identified high temperature metals recovery (HTMR) as
BDAT for metal constituents in nonwastewater forms of listed hazardous wastes, with
the exceptions of arsenic, mercury in low-mercury subcategory wastes (i.e., wastes
containing less than 260 mg/kg mercury), and chromium. HTMR processes include
rotary kilns, flame reactors, electric furnaces, plasma arc furnaces, slag reactors, and
rotary hearth/electric furnaces. ' -
BDAT for arsenic is slag vitrification, rather than HTMR, because this
technology is demonstrated, commercially available, and achieves substantial treatment
of arsenic. The vitrification process is capable of managing a wide variety of arsenic-
bearing wastes. At the temperatures at which the vitrification process is normally
operable (1,100 to 1,400°C), organoarsenic compounds will be combusted to arsenic
oxide, carbon dioxide, and water. The arsenic oxide formed will react with the other
glass-forming constituents and become immobilized in the glass formed^ The Agency has
data indicating that arsenic can be vitrified into slag at concentrations of up to 24
percent arsenic, and that the slag so generated will pass the EP-toxicity test for arsenic
(50). . -
BDAT for mercury in low-mercury subcategory wastes is acid leaching,
rather than HTMR, because this technology is demonstrated, commercially available, and
achieves substantial treatment of mercury in low-mercury subcategory wastes. The acid
leaching treatment performance data presented in Section 5.0 of this document represent
the "best" available treatment performance data for mercury in low-mercury subcategory
wastes. Because the acid leaching performance data included in Section 5.0 represent
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nrj v 4-12
-------
BDAT for wastes included in previous rulemakings, these data have been judged
previously to meet the criteria for "best" treatment technology.
BDAT for chromium is stabilization, rather than HTMR, because this
technology is demonstrated, commercially available, and achieves concentration levels
that the Agency believes may be routinely achieved by industry for the treatment of
chromium-bearing wastes. EPA evaluated treatment performance data from several
sources, including data on the performance of HTMR and stabilization technologies.
EPA selected a set of stabilization treatment performance data upon which to calculate
the universal standard for chromium because these data represented treatment of
difficult to treat wastes, including stripping liquids, plating and pelletizing operation
wastes, and cleanout wastes from plating tanks. These stabilization data, presented in
Section 5.0 of this document, represent the "best" available treatment performance data
for chromium.
The Agency used the following rationale for identifying HTMR as BDAT
for most metal constituents in nonwastewater forms of listed hazardous wastes. Since
metals cannot be destroyed, treatment options for metal-bearing wastes are limited.
Typically, these options include technologies that either can recover the metal or
incorporate the metal into a stable matrix resistant to leaching, the Agency believes
that the "best" treatment for metal constituents is recovery, especially in cases of high
waste metal concentrations. Of the applicable technologies, HTMR appears to be the
most matrix-independent (i.e., it consistently achieves the same levels of treatment
performance regardless of influent matrix composition). HTMR also generally decreases
the amount of material sent for land disposal, recovers valuable resources, and
incorporates metals that are not recoverable into a stable slag matrix.
The Agency's review of the HTMR performance data indicated that the
slag residues for land disposal leach concentrations of metals that are comparable to
(and, for most metals, less than) residues from stabilization of similar wastes.
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj
-------
Furthermore, the use of HTMR is consistent with the national policy, identified in
HSWA, to reduce the quantity of hazardous constituents disposed in landfills (this is in
contrast to non-recovery technologies, such as stabilization, which are not intended to
reduce the total concentration or quantity of hazardous constituents in the waste and, in
fact, can increase the volume being sent to landfills). In addition, because metals are
recovered instead of land disposed, ore processing is reduced, thus saving energy and
pollution from those processes. All of the HTMR data included in Section 53 represent
BDAT for wastes included in previous rulemakings and therefore previously have been
judged to meet the conditions listed above for identification of "best" technology.
EPA recommends, however, that if recovery is not feasible because the
metal content in the waste is too low or the material contains constituents that may
adversely affect recovered products, then the generator should investigate alternative
ways to generate wastes that are amenable to recovery (e.g., segregation) or to substitute
materials that are suitable for recovery for those unrecoverable materials that eventually
become wastes. As a last resort, technologies such as stabilization and chemical
conversion to less leachable metal compounds should be used to treat metal-containing
wastes.
The Agency realizes that recovery of metals from all wastes is not
practical; at.some level of metal concentration (EPA believes this to be approximately
1% total BDAT List metal constituents), recovery efforts typically cease, and the
remaining metals must be incorporated into a leach-resistant matrix for safe disposal.
The Agency has data indicating that most of the treatment standards for individual
metals can be achieved by using stabilization as well as HTMR (see Tables 6-4 and 6-5).
NRJ-073
4-14
-------
Table 4-1
BDAT Technologies for Organic Constituents Selected for
Regulation in Nonwastewater Forms of Wastes
Constituent Selected for Regulation
Accnaphthalene
Acenaphthene
Acetone
Acetonitrile
Acetophenone
2-AcetyIaminofluorene
Acrylamide
Acrylonitrile
Aldrin
Aniline
Anthracene
Benz(a)anthracene
Benzal Chloride
Benzene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(a)pyrene
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
BromodichJoromethane
Bromoform (Tribromomethane)
4-Bromophenyl Phenyl Ether
Bromomethane (Methyl Bromide)
BDAT Technology Basis
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
\ Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
.Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj
4-15
-------
Table 4-1
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for Regulation .
n-Butanol
Butyl Benzyl Phthalate
2-scc-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol (Dinoseb)
Carbon Bisulfide
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chlordane
p-Chloroaniline
Chlorobenzene •
2-Chloro-13-butadiene .
Chlbrodibromomethane
Chloroethane
bis(2-ChIoroethoxy)methane
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
Chloroform
bis(2-Chloroisopropji)ether
p-Chloro-m-cresol
Chloromethane
2-Chloronaphthalene '
2-Chlorophenol
3-Chloropropene
Chrysene •
Cresol (m- and p-isomers)
(3-MethyIphenol, 4-MethyIphenol)
o-Cresol (2-Methylphenol)
Cyclohexanone
o,p'-DDD
p,p'-DDD
. BDAT Technology Basis
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nrj
4-16
-------
Table 4-1
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for Regulation
o,p'-DDE
p,p'-DDE
o,p'-DDT
p,p'-DDT
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
l£-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
Dibromomethane
tris-(23-Dibromopropyl)phosphate
m-Dichlorobenzenc
o-Dichlorobenzene
p-Dichlorobenzene
Dichlorodifluoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-DichJoroethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,6-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid (2,4-D)
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
trans- 1,3-Dichloropropene
Dieldrin
Diethyl Phthalate
2,4-Dimethyl Phenol
Dimethyl Phthalate
Di-n-butyl Phthalate.
BDAT Technology Basis .
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
. Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration •
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj
4-17
-------
Table 4-1
(Continued)
§ Constituent Selected for Regulation
1,4-Dinitrobenzene
4,6-Dinitro-o-oresol
2,4-Dinitrophcnol
| 2,4-Dinitrotoluene
(I 2,6-Dinitrotoluenc
1 Di-n-octyl Phthalate
jj 1,4-Dioxane
y Diphenylamine
1 Diphenylnitrosamine
Di-n-propylnitrosamine
Disulfoton
Endosulfan I
1 Endosulfan II
1 Endosulfan Sulfate
1 Endrin
1 Endrin Aldehyde
Ethyl Acetate
Ethyl Ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Ethyl Methacrylate
Ethylbenzene
Ethyicne Dibromide (1,2-Dibromoethane)
Famphur
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
r ~~~
Hcptachlor
Hcptachlor Epoxide
BOAT Technology Basis ]
Incineration ||
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration '
J . . II
Incineration ||
~ — : 11
Fuel Substitution
, Fuel Substitution
Incineration
Sludge Drying
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
.Incineration'
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Sludge Drying
Incineration
• Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
NRJ-073
4-18
-------
Table 4-1
(Continued)
Constituent Selected Tor Regulation
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorabutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins
Hexachlorodibenzofurans
Hexachloroethane
Hexachloropropene
Indeno(lA3)pyrene
lodomethane
Isobutanol
Isodrin •
Isosafrole
Kepone
Methacrylonitrile
Methanol .
Methapyrilene
Methoxychlor
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
Methyl Methacrylate
Methyl Parathion
3-Melhylcholanthrene
Methylene Chloride
4,4'-Methylene-bis(2-chloroaniline)
Naphthalene
o-Nitroaniline (2-Nitroaniline)
p-Nitroaniline (4-Nitroaniline)
BOAT Technology Basis
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
'. Incineration
Incineration
Sludge Drying
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj
4-19
-------
Table 4-1
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for Regulation
Nitrobenzene
N-Nitroso-di-n-butylamine
N-Nitrosodiethylamine
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
N-Nitrosomethylethylamine
N-Nitrosomorpholine
N-Nitrosopiperidine
N-Nitrosopyrrolidine
o-Nitrophenol (2-Nitrophenol)
p-Nitrophcnol (4-Nitrophenol)
5-Nitro-o-toIuidine
Parathion
Pcntachlorobenzene
Pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins
Pentachlorodibenzofurans
Pentachloroc thane
Pentachloronitrobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenacetin
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Phorate
Phthalic Anhydride
Pronamide
Propanenitrile (Ethyl Cyanide)
Pyrene
Pyridine t •
.••;•.; BOAT Technology Basis
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
. Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Sludge Drying
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Sludge Drying
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nq
4-20
-------
Table 4-1
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for Regulation
Safrole
Silvex (2,4,5-TP)
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins
Tetrachlorodibenzofurans
1,1,1,2-Tetrachlorocthane
1, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
TetrachJoroethylene
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
Toluene (Methyl Benzene)
Total PCBs
Toxaphene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
l,M-Trichloroethane
1, 1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethyiene
Trichloromonofluoromethane
(Fluorotrichloromethane)
2^4,5-Trichlorophenol .
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4,5-TrichIorophenoxyacetic Acid (2,4,5-T)
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
l.l,2-Trichloro-l,2,2-trifluoroethane
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene(s) (total)
BOAT Technology Basis f
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration II
Incineration ||
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration
Incineration ||
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nrj
4-21
-------
Table 4-2
BDAT Technologies for Metal Constituents Selected for
Regulation in Nonwastewater Forms of Wastes
Constituent Selected for Regulation
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
("Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
BDAT Technology Basis
High Temperature Metals Recovery
Slag Vitrification
High Temperature Metals Recovery
High Temperature Metals Recovery
High Temperature Metals Recovery
Stabilization
High Temperature Metals Recovery
Acid Leaching
High Temperature Metals Recovery
High Temperature Metals Recovery
High Temperature Metals Recovery
High Temperature Metals Recovery
High Temperature Metals Recovery
High Temperature Metals Recovery
NRJ-073
0629-01.nij
4-22
-------
5.0 NONWASTEWATER TREATMENT PERFORMANCE DATA
This section discusses the treatment performance data used in determining
universal standards for nonwastewater forms of listed hazardous wastes (i.e., the
nonwastewater treatment performance data). These treatment performance data are
used elsewhere in this document to select constituents for regulation (Section 3.0), to
determine which technologies represent BOAT (Section 4.0) and to develop universal
standards for those constituents (Section 6.0).
To account for the wide range of physical forms and chemical compositions
of wastes, the Agency examined all available BOAT treatment performance data used to
develop nonwastewater treatment standards for listed hazardous wastes regulated to date
under the Land Disposal Restrictions Program. The data included in Tables 5-1 and 5-3
represent the treatment performance data used to develop the treatment standards for
constituents in nohwastewater forms of listed hazardous wastes applicable to universal
standards. Tables 5-2 and 5-6 present the treatment tests from which the treatment
performance data for organic and metal constituents, respectively, were used.
In addition, the Agency is developing a universal standard for vanadium
based on HTMR treatment performance data that were used to determine treatment
standards for nonwastewater forms of K061 wastes and is developing a universal standard
for chromium based on industry-submitted stabilization data for nonwastewater forms of
D007. These data are presented in Tables 5-4 and 5-5.
The treatment performance data included hi Tables 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, and 5-5
represent BOAT for nonwastewater forms of wastes in previous rulemakings, and,
therefore, represent BDAT for universal standards. The Agency believes that these data
are preferable for determining universal standards because the data represent BDAT
treatment, indicate substantial treatment of constituents of concern, are matrix
independent (i.e., achievable on a routine and consistent basis), and indicate treatment
V • ...
NRJ-073
0629-0 t.nrj '5-1
-------
of constituents present or believed to be present in the untreated waste. Treatment
performance data are presented separately for organic constituents and metal
constituents.
5'1 Treatment Performance Data Associated with BOAT Treatment Standards
Tables 5-1 and 5-3 include the treatment performance data used in
determining universal standards. The Agency selected an appropriate universal standard
after evaluating the available treatment performance data for each constituent. This
process is described in Section 6.0.
Tables 5-1 and 5-3 also contain all of the data that are applicable to the
calculation of treatment standards for each constituent selected for regulation under
universal standards. Columns 1 and 2 show the treatment standard for each constituent
and the waste code(s) to which this treatment standard applies, respectively.
Treatment standards are calculated using three values: the concentration
in the treated waste, an accuracy correction factor, and a variability factor. These factors
account for analytical limitations in available treatment performance data and variability
related to waste treatment, sampling, and analytical techniques and procedures.
5.1.1 Concentration in the Treated Waste
The concentration in the treated waste residual, shown in Column 3 of
Tables 5-1 and 5-3, was used in calculating treatment standards for nonwastewater forms
of listed hazardous wastes. For most organic constituents treated by incineration, a
detection limit in the residual ash generally represented the concentration. That is, the
constituent was treated to a concentration below that which could be detected using the
appropriate analytical methods. For metals, the constituent was usually detected in the
treated waste residual.
NRJ-073 ' •
0629-Ol.nt) , 5-2
-------
Rather than testing the performance of BDAT on every waste in previous
rulemakings, in certain cases, the Agency transferred treatment performance data from a
tested waste to a similar untested waste. To develop treatment standards for wastes for
which the Agency does not have treatment performance data, the Agency determined
that the constituents present in the untested waste can be treated to the same
performance levels as those observed in other wastes for which treatment data exist
EPA believes such transfers are technically valid in cases where the untested wastes are
generated from similar industries or processing steps, or have similar waste
characteristics affecting performance and treatment selection.
The transfer of treatment performance data to similar wastes or wastes
from similar processing steps was based on a detailed comparison of the constituents of
concern in the tested and untested wastes. If the parameters that affect treatment
performance for these constituents indicated that the untreated waste can be treated as
effectively as the tested waste, then the transfer could be made. Column 4 of Tables 5-1
and 5-3 shows the treatment test from which the concentration in the treated waste,
accuracy correction factor, and variability factor were transferred.
Additionally, in cases where adequate treatment performance data for a
constituent of concern were unavailable, the Agency transferred data from a constituent
determined to be similar in a similar waste. The Agency divided the organic constituents
into treatability groups in which constituents were expected to behave similarly during
treatment by an applicable technology. The division of organic constituents into
treatability groups is described in Section 3.1.1. Column 5 of Tables 5-1 and 5-3 shows
the constituent from which the concentration in the treated waste and variability factor
were transferred.
NRJ-073 v
0629-01.nrj 5_3
-------
5.1.2
Accuracy Correction Factors
Accuracy correction factors account for analytical interferences associated
with the chemical matrices of the samples. The concentration in the .treated waste that
was used to calculate a treatment standard was corrected using matrix spike recovery
data, as follows:
(1) A matrix spike recovery (percent) was determined for each waste
constituent. Matrix spike recovery data were transferred from the
same test from which the concentration in the treated waste was
taken. In cases where matrix spike recovery data were not
available, data were transferred from treatment of a similar waste.
(2) If a matrix spike was not performed for the waste constituent of
concern, matrix spike recovery data from a similar constituent were
transferred. The source of recovery data used for each constituent
is indicated in Column 6 of Tables 5-1 and 5-3.
(3) In cases where data were not available for a specific constituent, but
were, available for a similar class of constituents (e.g., volatile
organics, acid-extractable semivolatile organics), matrix spike
recovery data for the class of constituents were transferred. All
recovery values greater than or equal to 20% were averaged; the
constituent concentration was then adjusted by the averaged value.
Matrix spike percent recovery data are shown in parentheses in
Column 7 of Tables 5-1 and 5-3. This column also indicates
whether the matrix spike recovery of the constituent represents an
averaged value or actual result.
(4) An accuracy correction factor was determined for each of the
constituents by dividing 100 by the matrix spike recovery (percent)
for that constituent. The accuracy correction factors are presented
hi Column 7 of Tables 5-1 and 5-3.
/
(5) Concentrations in the treated waste for each of the waste
constituents were corrected by multiplying the treated concentration
for each constituent by its corresponding accuracy correction factor.
NRJ-073
062.941.taj
5-4
-------
5.13 Variability Factors
Variability factors account for the variability inherent in treatment
performance, treatment residual collection, and analysis of the treated waste samples. If
a constituent was detected in the treated residual, then a variability factor was calculated.
In instances where variability factors could not be calculated because waste constituents
were not detected in the incinerator ash residuals, a variability factor of 2.8 was used as
discussed in EPA's Methodology Background Document (3). This factor represents
EPA's generic variability factor calculated assuming a lognormal distribution of treated
waste concentrations and an order of magnitude difference between the highest and
lowest treated waste values. Variability factors are shown in Column 8 of Tables 5-1 and
5-3.
5.1.4 Calculation of the Treatment Standard
Calculation of BDAT treatment standards involves three steps:
(1) accuracy correction of the treatment performance data to account for any analytical
interferences associated with the chemical make-up of the samples; (2) determination of
a variability factor specific to each constituent in a treatment performance data set to
correct for normal variations in the performance of a particular technology over time;
and (3) calculation of the treatment standard, which is equal to the average
concentration in the treated waste multiplied by the accuracy correction factor multiplied
by the variability factor. The treatment standards are shown in Column 1 of Tables 5-1
and 5-3. •
5-2 Treatment Performance Data for Organic Constituents
/
Table 5-1 presents the constituent-specific treatment performance data for
organic constituents in nonwastewater forms of listed hazardous wastes. As explained in
Section 3.1, the organic constituents are divided into treatability groups. Table 3-2 lists
f , >'
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj 5.5
-------
the organic constituents selected for regulation in universal standards by treatability
group; the treatment performance data in Table 5-1 are also organized by treatability
group. . ,
For each constituent in Table 5-1, the nonwastewater treatment
performance data represent data used to calculate each nonwastewater treatment
standard that has been promulgated to date for that constituent in a listed waste under
the Land Disposal Restrictions Program.
In the incorporation of treatment data into Table 5-1, the Agency'chose to
use other available treatment performance data in preference to data from F024, F037,
F038, K011, K013, K014, K043, K048, K049, K050, K051, K052, and K099 wastes. The
Agency believes that other treatment performance data are more appropriate for
representing treatment of "universal" wastes. However, the Agency chose to use data for
these 13 wastes when the data were used to develop the only nonwastewater treatment
standard promulgated to date for a constituent regulated under universal standards.
The Agency is aware of only one facility in the United States that produces
2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and consequently generates K043 and K099
wastes. This facility submitted treatment performance data for these wastes; these data
were used to develop the promulgated K043 and K099 treatment standards; Since these
wastes are unique to this facility, and since the promulgated treatment standards were
based on treatment performance data from this facility, the Agency believes that the
promulgated K043 and K099 treatment standards may not be appropriate for other waste
matrices.
The data included in Table 5-1 represent treatment performance data from
the incineration, fuel substitution, and -sludge drying tests listed in Table 5-2. In addition
to using data from full-scale operations, data developed at research facilities or obtained
NRJ-073 v
0629-Ol.nij 5-6
-------
at less than full-scale operations were included, provided that the technology was
demonstrated in full-scale operation for the waste or similar wastes.
\ _ '
5.3 Treatment Performance Data for Metal Constituents
Tables 5-3, 5-4, and 5-5 present the constituent-specific treatment
performance data for metal constituents in nonwastewater forms of listed hazardous
waste. The nietal constituents selected for regulation in nonwastewater forms of waste
are listed in Table 3-3.
For each constituent in Table 5-3, the nonwastewater treatment
performance data/epresent data used to calculate each treatment standard that has been
promulgated to date for that constituent in a listed waste, under the Land Disposal
Restrictions Program.
Although a treatment standard for vanadium has not been promulgated to
date, the Agency is developing a universal standard for vanadium in this rulemaking,
based on the HTMR treatment performance data presented in Table 5-4.
The data presented hi Table 5-4 represent HTMR data that were
previously used to promulgate treatment standards for metal constituents in
nonwastewater forms of K061 wastes and .alternative BDAT treatment standards for
metal constituents in nonwastewater forms of F006 and K062 wastes. Since the only
BDAT data for HTMR performance available to the Agency were for the treatment of
nonwastewater forms of K061, F006, and K062 wastes, these data were selected to .
develop the universal standard for vanadium. EPA used only Toxicity Characteristic
Leachate Procedure (TCLP) HTMR data from well-designed and well-operated HTMR
processes. These data are presented in further detail in EPA's Final Best Demonstrated
Available Technology (BDAT) Background Document fAddendunri for All
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nij 5-7
-------
Nonwastewater Forms of KQ61 and Alternative BOAT Treatment Standards for FQ06
and K062 Nonwastewaters (61).
The Agency is developing a universal standard for chromium based on the
stabilization treatment performance data presented in Table 5-5. EPA evaluated waste
characterization and treatment performance data for chromium from several sources,
including data on the performance of HTMR and stabilization technologies for
chromium. As discussed in Section 4.2.2, these stabilization data represent the "best"
available treatment performance data for chromium. EPA selected the stabilization data
presented in Table 5-5 to develop the universal standard for chromium because these
data represent treatment of chromium in difficult to treat wastes, including stripping
liquids, plating and palletizing operation wastes, and cleanout wastes from plating tanks.
These data, along with all of the treatment performance data for chromium evaluated by
EPA, are presented in further detail in EPA's Final Best Demonstrated Available
Technology (BDAT) Background Document for Chromium Wastes (D007 and UQ321
(52), and in a memorandum included in the Administrative Record (76).
The data included in Tables 5-3, 5-4, and 5-5 represent treatment
performance data from the treatment tests listed in Table 5-6. In addition to using data
from full-scale operations, data developed at research facilities or obtained at less than
full-scale operations were included, provided that the technology was demonstrated in
full-scale operation for the waste or similar wastes.
NRJ-073 • v
0629-Ol.hij 5-8
-------
Table 5-1
Constituent Selected
for Regulation
— '
==
(1)
Treatment
Standard
(mg/kg)
m .
Watte Coded)
=====
(3)
Concentration
in Treated
Waste
— -—- ^'-&»>«.«. ^*v»u*««.u%,lBt0 ^l^UIlTTaOlCYTUl'Via/
(4)
Treatment tesf
From Which the
PerfonautteData11
Were Tramf erred
(5)
Coa»tita«t From Wfckh the
Concentration m Tratted
Waste Wai Transferrwl
(«
CoBttJtaeat from Which
the AeMuwty Cwrectioa
D«t« WenTraiBferred
ro
Aa*t*a^Ai*i>
Correction
Factor
(Mtok Sp&e %
Recovery)
ttk ,«
_
Benzene
f
Ethylhenzene
Toluene
Xylene(s) (lotal)
— '"• •'••"" _ in-..
0.071
4.4
6.0
6.6
36
6.0 -
0.034
0.65
6.0
28
23
0.07
28
33
=
K060, K087
K085, K105
K103, K104
K083
F039, U019, F001-F005
F039, K086, F001-F005
K022
K087
K015
U051, U220, F001-
F005, F039, K001,
K086
K037
K087
F039, K086, U239
K001, U051, F001-
F005
Aromatic Hydrocarbons I
<0.025
<0.33
<2.0
<2.0
<10.0
<2.0
<0.012
0.095
<2.0
<10.0
«10.0
<0.025
<10.0
<10.0
K087
yi yA Test B||rn
(Test 2)
K019
K019
K001-C
K019
K022
K087
K019
K001-C
K037
K087
K001-C
K001-C
Benzene
Hexachlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Benzene
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Xylenes
Xylenes
Xylenes
Benzene
Hexachlorobenzene
1,2-Dichlorocthane
Benzene
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Toluene
Xylenes
Chlorobenzene
Xylenes
1.02 (98)«
.4.76(21)'
1.06 (94)
1.18 (85)°
1.28(78)'
1.06 (94)
1 (106)°
1 (104)°
1.06 (94)
1.01 (99)°
1 (165)«
1(107)
1 (102)"
1.16 (86)
2.8
18
2.8
2.8
18
2.8
2.8
6.85
18
18
18
2.8
18
2.8 jj
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nrj
< - Indicates a detection limit value.
•See Table 5-2 for more information on treatment tests.
performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor
ihis number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
'See noles at end of this table. • 5.9
-------
Table 5-1 (Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
(I)
Treatment
Standard
m
Waste Coded)
0)
CottctBtntuoo
k Treated
Wade
W
Tre*ta«aiTe»t
FnmWhfckt**
IVrfonuMttttM**
WeraTrtfhrftfRd
W
CoottitMrt Fro* WUck Oe
W
TO
Aeotracy
CMYt£«MR)l
'in -8
t>
V-rf*W*5
Carbon tMsnlfldc " if:? ' * "si-
Carbon Disulfidc
4.8*
F001-F005
0.90"
F001-P005
Carbon Disulfidc
y
No accuracy correction
data were used
'-
534;
n
»
NRJ-073
(tr.29-OJ.ntj
< - Indicates a detection limit value.
•See TaJ)le 5-2 for more information on treatment tests.
'Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
This number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
'See notes at end of this table. 5-10
-------
Table 5-1 (Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
(1)
Treatment
Stamford
(rag/kg)
(2)
Waste Coded)
(3)
Concentration
in Treated
Watte
(mg/k|)
(4)
Treatment Test
From Wfcfch th«
Performance Data"
WereTrttrferred
(5)
Constitaent From Whfcfc tbe
Concentration in Treated
WuteWai Transferred
Chlorinated Pesticides
Aldrin
-alpha-SHC
hcta-BHC
della-BHC
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Chlordane '
o,p'-DDD
p,p'-DDD
0.066
0.066
0.066
0.066
0.066
0.13
0.26d
0.087
0.087
F039, P004
F039, U129
F039, U129
F039, U129
F039, U129
F039, U036
K032, K097
F039, U060,
U061
F039, U060,
U061
.<0.0066
<6.0066
<0.0066
<0.0066
< 0.0066
<0.013
<0.026
<0.013
<0.013
3rd 3* Test Burn
(Test 2)
3rf 3ri Test Burn
(Test 2)
3rt 3" Test Burn
(Test 2)
3rd 3rd Test Burn
(Test 2)
3ri 3rf Test Burn
(Test 2)
3ri 3rf Test Burn
(Test 2)
3* 3ri Test Burn
(Test 2)
3rt 3rf Test Burn
(Testl)
3M 3* Test Burn
(Testl)
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
deita-BHC
gamma-BHC
Chlordane
Chlordane
(alpha and gamma)
o,p'-DDD
p,p'-DDD
(0
Co«dto«tFromWHd.
ttMAttbr*t}C«mdtoft
Dit* W«t Transferred
Heptachlor
Heptachlor
Heptachlor
Heptachlor
Heptachlor
Heptachlor
Chlordane
Methoxychlor
Methoxychlor
(7)
Accuracy
CoiTediott
Factor
(MrtrhSpflteH
ttebtteri
3.57 (28)°
357 (28)*
3.57 (28)'
357(28)°
3.57 (28)'
3.57 (28)°
3.57 (28)
2.38 (42)°
2.38 (42)'
*
/*!
VatMi
Fac«
. 3
***************?
2^
24
i
2.8
2.8
2*
2.8
2.8
2.8
. i"
2.8
NRJ-073
»f.29-01.nrj
< - Indicates a detection limit value.
•See Table 5-2 for more information on treatment tests.
performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor
mis number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
'See notes at end of this table. . 5-11
-------
Table 5-1 (Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
U)
Treatment
Standard
(ug/Iqt)
a)
Waste C«k(i)
0)
CoKottrttton
in Trotted
Warte
t»
Frw» WHck tks
PerforttJ«t«D*U'
Chlorinated Pettklde*
o,p'-DDE
p,r/-DDE
o,p'-DDT
P.P--DDT
Dieldrin
Endosulfan I
Endosulfan 11
Endosulfan Sulfate
Endrin
Endrin Aldehyde
0.087
0.087
0.087
0.087
0.13
0.066
0.13
0.13 .
0.13
0.13
F039, U061
F039, U061
F039, U061
R)39, U061
F039, P037
F039, P050
F039, P050
F039, P050
F039, P051
F039, P051
<0.013
<0.013
<0.013
<0.013
<0.013
< 0.0066
<0.013
<0.013
<0.013
<0.013
3* y* Test Burn
(Testl)
y4 3" Test Burn
(Test 1)
y* y4 Test Burn
(Testl)
y* y* Test Burn
(Testl)
3rd 3" Test Burn
(Test 2)
3" 3rd Test Burn
(Test 2)
3- 3"1 Test Burn
(Test 2)
3rt 3rt Test Burn
(Test 2)
31* 31* Test Burn
(Test 2)
3" 3ri Test Burn
(Test 2)
(5)
OMMtMwnt Fro* WUck tfce
WuteWttTrauftittd
W
CM Attxtttj CtnttoMi
i (Cent'd.) MJ
o,p'-DDE
p,p'-DDE
o,p'-DDT
p,p'-DDT
Dieldrin
Endosulfan I
Endosulfan D
Endosulfan Sulfate
Endrin
Endrin Aldehyde
Methoxychlor
Methoxychlor
Methoxychlor
Methoxychlor
Heptachlor
Heptachlor
Heptachlor
Heptachlor
Heptachlor
Heptachlor
TO
Attiiiftcy
>:. FlKtK
jRiKwTflljff
238 (42)'
238 (42)«
2.38 (42)'
2.38 (42)'
3.57 (28)*
3.57 (28)e
3.57 (28)'
357 (28)*
3.57 (28)°
3.57 (28)°
w 3
1
[i
2A
18
18 '
18
23
18
18
18
18
2.8
NRI-073
()r>29-0l.nrj
< - Indicates a detection limit value.
•See Table 5-2 for more information on treatment tests.
'Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
This number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
'See notes at end of this table. • . 5-12
-------
Table 5-1 (Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
Heptachlor
Meptachlor Epoxidc
Hcxachlorobutadicnc
Hexachlorocyclo-
pcntadienc
t
Isodrin
Kepone
Mcthoxychlor
(1)
Treatment
Standard
(mg/kg)
0.066
0.066
5.6
' 28
2.4
3.6
5.6
0.066
0.13
0.18
(Z)
Waste Coded)
(3)
Concentration
• in Treated
Waste
(mg/kt)
W)
Treatment T«*t
From Wncli tiw
Performance Data*
Were Titof erred
(5)
Constituent From Wfcfcfc die
Concentration in Treated
Waste Wo* Transferred
., ,J:(«
•-•lW ;:-
; |f ;: •'
CoiStili^FroaiWMcli
tb« Accvraey Comedo*
Chlorinated Pesticides (Cont'd.) -S,
F039, P059,
K032, K097
R)39, P059,
, K032, K097
K016, K018,
K028, K030
F025, F039,
U128
K032, K033,
K034, K097
F039, U130
K016
F039, P060
F039, U142
P039, U247
<0.0066
<0.0066
<2.0
<10.0
<0.33
<0.36
<2.0
<0.0066
<2.0
<0.013
3ri 3rd Test Burn
(Test 2)
y* y* Test Burn
(Test 2)
K019
K019
yi 3ri Test Bufn
(Test 2)
31" 3rf Test Burn
(Test 2)
K019
3"1 3rf Test Burn
(Test 2)
KQ01-C
3ri 3"* Test Bum
(Test 2)
Heptachlor
Heptachlor
Naphthalene
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclo-
pentadiene
Hexachlorocyclo-
pentadiene
Phenanthrene
Isodrin
Kepone
Methoxychlor
Heptachlor
Heptachlor
Naphthalene
Trichloroethylene
Hexachlorocyclo-
pentadiene
Heptachlor
Phenanthrene
Heptachlor
Heptachlor eporide
Methoxychlor
W
Accuracy
Cotttdioti
Factor
(Matrix Spik*%
RetOTery)
3^7 (28)«
3.57 (28)«
1(103)
1 (107)e
2.6(38)
157 (28)'
1(103)
3.57 (28)'
1.33 (75)'
5.0(20)^
to i
1
VartaWJl
FKttr
t
2.8
2.8
2^ ,
2^
2* ,
2-8 I
2.8
2.8
2.8
£8
NRJ-073
llf.29-()l.nrj
< - Indicates a detection limit value.
•See Table 5-2 for more information on treatment tests.
""Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy conection factor, and variability factor.
This number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
'See, notes at end of this table. 5-13
-------
Table 54 (Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
(1)
Treatment
Standard
(rag/kg)
(2)
Waste Coded)
0)
CoacenlratloB
fat Treated
Wttfe
. (0
1
TreafittertTttt
FronWhlcklto
PtrfonuttcethU*
(5)
Co*rtta**l Fro* WWtfc tte
OwcttttrttkmtaTrtMed
W
nst'sss
m
Acotracy
Factor -
nr*
i
Chlorinated festkldes (ContU) ^ " ^
Toxaphcne
1.3
2.6
=====
F039, P123
K041, K098
• ' - ' •-' -"•'••» " q^"
<0.134
<0.26*
3" 3rt Test Bum
(Test 2)
3rf 3rf Test Burn
(Test 2)
Cblordane
Chlordane
(alpha and gamma)
Heptachlor
Chlordane
357 (28)*
3.57 (28)
18
Z8
NRJ-073
()f)29-(ll.nrj
< - Indicates a detection limit value.
•See Table 5-2 for more information on treatment tests.
'Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
•This number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
'See notes at end of this table. • . 5-14
-------
Table 5-1 (Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
(l)
Treatment
Standard
(•ng/kg) .
(2)
Waste Coded)
(3)
Concentration
in Treated
Waste
<«»g/k|.)
(4)
i
Treatment Tert*
From WUdi ike
Performance Data'
WereTrtotofeiTed
(5)
Cowtftaait From Whfcfc fh»
Concentration in Treated
Watte Wai Transferred
W
CowtrtM*FiX»nWfcich
UW ntAM'Ulf dHTfetntMl
DataWeMTrauferred
m
Accttraey
ConecoVtt
Factor
(MatrttSptte*
> RetOfOrf )
Chlorinated Phenolic* and ttartaitta*
p-Chloro-m-cresol
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophcnol
2,6-Dichlorophcnol
2,4-Dichlorophenoxy-
acetic Acid (2,4-D)
Pentachlorophenol
Silvcx (2,4,5-TP)
2,4,5-T
2,3,4,6-Tetrachloro-
phenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
14
4.4
5.7
14
14
10
7.4
7.9
7.9
37"
4.4
371
F039, U039
K105
F039.U048 s
F039, U081
F039, U082
F039, U240
F039, KOOl,
U051
F039
F039
F039
K105
F039
<5.0
<0.33
<2.0
<5.0
<5.0
0.2
<2.5
<0.155
<0.155
<12.5
<0.33
<12.5
K019
3rf 3ri Test Burn
(Test 2)
K019
K019
K019
3"1 y Test Burn
(Test 2)
K001-PCP
3rf 3" Test Burn
(Test 2)
3ri 3" Test Bum
(Test 2)
K001-PCP
3ri y Test Bum
(Test 2)
K001-PCP
p-Chloro-m-cresol
Hexachlorobenzene
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,6-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dichloro-
phenoxyacetic Acid
Pentachlorophenol
2,4-Dichloro-
phenoxyacetic Acid
2,4-Dichloro-
phenoxyacetic Acid
Pentachlorophenol
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
p-Chloro-m-cresol
Hexachlorobenzene
2-Chlorophenol
2-Chlorophenol
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichloro-
phenoxyaccttc Acid
Pentachlorophenol
2,4-Dichloro-
phenoxyacctic Add
2,4-Dichloro-
phenoxyacetic Acid
Pentachlorophenol
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorophenol
1 (110)'
4.76 (21)«
1.02 (98)'
1.02(98)'
1.02 (98)'
5 (20)M
1,05 (95)'
5(20)^
5(20)^
1.05(95)°
4.76 (21)'
1.05 (95)'
•»'*
vuj
J
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
10.13
2.8
10.13
10.13
i
2.8
^HWMMHM^MM
2.8
2.8
NRJ-073
(1629-01.nrj
< - Indicates a detection limit value.
•See Table 5-2 for more information on treatment tests.
'Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
This number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
'See notes at end of this table. ' 5-15
-------
Table 5-1 (Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
(1)
Treatment
Standard
0)
Watte Coded)
0)
Concentration
fa Treated
WMle
TrectauiItT***
VnmVNAQ*
WereHraMtend
(5)
GMrttanrt Frtrn Wkfcfc the
Watte Wai Trmntf «rr«d
m
Accuracy
Trichlorophcnol
- ... =====
4.4
. 37*
=====:
K105
F039
<033
<12.5
3" 3" Test Bum
(Test 2)
K001-PCP
Hcxachlorobenzcne
Pentachlorophenol
Hcxachlorobenzcne
Pentachlorophenol
4.76 (21)*
1.05(95)'
?v *^8
2.8
2.8
NRJ-073
0629-OI.nrj
< - Indicates a detection limit value.
•See Table 5-2 for more information on treatment tests.
'Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracf correction factor, and variability factor
This number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike. '
'See notes at end of this table. ' . 5-16
-------
Table 5-1 (Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
(1)
Treatment
Standard
. tag/kg)
(Z)
Waste Coded)
(3)
Concentration
in Treated
Waste
(ing/kg)
(4)
Treattfttffttt*
From Which the
PerfonttattceDaU'
WereTra*ferrcd
(5)
Comtitwntt From WMch ft*
Concentration fa Treated
«)
Ce*tfaM»trttMiWUck
dMAcamcyComdiMi %
Chlarobenzenes .
Chlorobenzene
/
m-Dichlorohcn/enc
o-Dichlorobenzene
p-Dichlorobenzene
4.4
5.7
6tf
4.4
5.6
6.2
4.4
6.2
4.4
6.2
K085, K105
F039, U037,
F001-F005
K019
K085
K096
F039> U071
K042, K085,
K105
F039, K086,
U070, F001-
F005
K042, K085,
K105
F039, U072
<0.33
<2.0
<2.0
<0.33
<2.0
<2.0
<033
<2.0
<033
<2.0
3* 3Bi T-
2.8
2.8
2,8
23
2.8
2.8
2£
2.8
2^
2.8
NRJ-073
()629-Ol.nrj
< - Indicates a detection limit value.
•See Table 5-2 for more information on treatment tests.
'Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
This number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
'See notes at end of this table. 5-17
-------
Table 5-1 (Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
Hexachlorobcnzenc
Pentachloroben/cnc
Pentachloronltro-
benzene
1,2,4,5-Tetrachloro-
benzene
(»
Treatment
Standard
(rag/kg)
4.4
28
37
.4.4
28
37
4.8 •
4.4
19
14
W
W«te Coded)
,
K085
K016, K018
P025, F039,
U127
•K042, K085
K030
F039, U183
P039, U185
K042, K08S
F039, U207
K030
0)
Concentration
in Treated
Watte
(•x/fcs)
(0
. TratetttTaf
Fro«WUcfcth*
rerfor*a«*t>*u'
WereTtotfctend
W
CoMtk»Mtrr«MWUdkt)w
CcMttMratlM (• Treated
WarteWMTnMftot«4
Chlorobeozeaw (Cont'd.) It
<0.33
<10.0 .
<10.0 i
<0.33
<10.0
<10.0
<0.36
<033
<5.0
<5.0
3"* y* Test Burn
(Test 2)
K019
K019
3rf 3" Test Burn
(Test 2)
K019
K019
3d y* Test Burn
(Test 2)
3ri 3* Test Burn
(Test 2)
K019
K019
Hcxachlorobenzcnc
Hcxachlorobenzenc
Hexachlorobenzcne
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorobenzene
Pentachlorobenzene
Pentachloronitro-
benzene
Hexachlorobenzene
1,2,4^
Tetrachlorobenzene
1,2,4^- .
Tetrachlorobenzene
W
CNrtkMWlFrw^WUcli
dwAttdrtcyCtifrtdtod
fottWttttrtttfcrtri
, s -
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Hexachlorobenzene
Pentachlorobenzene
1^,4-Trichlorobenzene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1,2,4,5-
Tetrachlorobenzene
ff)
Accuracy
CMyfe^oMI
Fuctor '
(Mttifaapfat*
iut«twy)f
,
4.76 (21)»
1 (103)
1.33 (75)'
4.76 (21)'
1(103)
133 (75)«
4.76 (21)'
4.76 (21)»
133 (75)°
1(103)
m
t >->
VwiOlfcy
ft** "
5 j'» \
2A
• 2&
18
2^
2^
Z8
2^
2.8
18
18
NRJ-073
(lf>29-0l.nrj
< - Indicates a detection limit value.
•See Table 5-2 for more information on treatment tests.
'Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
' This number, represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
. ^See notes at end of this table. 5-18
-------
Table 5-1 (Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
1 ,2,4-Trichlorohen/ene
t
m """••' \~i * im'sssssss!", T' nags
(i)
Treatment
Standard
0)
Waste Coded)
(3)
Concentration
in Treated
Waste
(4)
TreabnMTetf
From Wttck the
Perfonaaaee Data'
Were Truttferred
(5)
Coutitmnt From WUch the
Concentration la Treated
Waste Was Transferred
,«
the Accvrat)' Comredimi
Chlorobenzencs (Cont'd.)
4.4
19
K042, K085
F039, K019,
KQ30, K096
<0.33
<5.0
3"1 y* Test Burn
(Test 2)
K019
Hexachlorobenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Hexachlorobenzene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
m
ACCUfMJf
CtrrtdiNi ..
Factor
4.76 (21)e
133 (75)'
ID.!
J
* ^
2.8
18
NRJ-073
l)n2
-------
Table 5-1 (Continued)
r — — ••-• •• — — — — _
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
— :— '- -- —••
(1)
Treatment
Standard
(»I/k«)
— - r - i '-*- " - - ;^*^^^m" ~
(2)
Waste Coded)
-"-' '• " """ ' ' '"JJ-" '-vpi"
(3)
CoBcentnrtioB
in Treated
Wtite
(nB%)
W
TratatatTttf
FrtMtWUckOM
P*rfon«u*c«D«Uv
VfmtimtomA
(5)
CowtfaMttt Fran WUeh tka
C«we^r*tlMi b TretUNl
WwteWwTr«Hftrtrf
SanBHHHnBHMMMMaHmOMBHM
W
CtmtibMMtrrmlVUcli
lfc*A«wwrfC«fmttai
thtUWeMTraMfen^
HalograirtedVotaUIes .'M-
Bcnzal Chloride
Carbon Tetrachloride
2-Chloro- 1 ,3-huladiene
Chloroethane
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)
Methane
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
6.2
5.6
6.2d
6.2d
0.28
6.0
6.0
7.2
"^"•••"""••••^•••B™
5.6
7.2
K015
F039, U211,
F001-P005
F025
K021, K073
P024
P039
K018
F039, U024
K019
F039, K017,
U025
<2.0
. <2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<0.10
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
K019
K019
K019
K019
F024
K019
K019
K019
K019.
K019
Benzal Chloride
Carbon Tetrachloride
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
2-Chloro-l,3-butadiene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)
methane
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-Chloroethji)ether
p-Dichlorobenzene
Trichloroethylene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
2-Chloro-l,3-butadiene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
1,1-Dichloroethylene
bis(2-
Chloroethyl)ether
1,1-Dichloroethylene
m
Accwacy
F«ctor
(M«iix9f*,%
Kettitfj)
1.1 (90)'
1 (107)*
1.1 (91)'
1.1 (91)'
1(129)
1.06 (94)
1.06 (94)
1.28(78)'
1(103)
1.2g (78)'
•••••
-1
* *Vi
Vftll^
Km
•<.
V ^
z.
2.1
2J
ii
2.1
. 2.1
2J
2J
2J
W
NfU-073
0629-OI.nrj
< - Indicates a detection limit value.
•See Table 5-2 for more information, on treatment tests.
performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
This number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
dSee notes at end of this table. . «
-------
Table 5-1 (Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
(1)
Treatment
Standard
(rag/kg)
(2)
.Waste Coded)
(3)
Concentration
in Treated
Waste
(«g/kl)
(4)
TreatmHttTcst*
From Which the
Performance Data'
Were Traittf erred
(5)
CoBttKoent From WUtk fee
CoocentratioaiaTre«ttd
Wtttt Was Transferred
W
rsjs±£
m
Accuracy
CttWdttNT '
Factor
(Matrix Sp£k«*
~T^
' ^
Halogenated Volatile* (Cont'd.) ; , i
Chloroform
bis(2-£hloroisopropyl)
Ether
Chloromethane
3-Chloropropene
Dichlorodifluoro-
methane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
5.6
*'
6.0
6.2"
7.2
33
28
7.2
6.0
7.2
6.0
6.2"
7.2
F039, U044,
K117, K118,
K136
K009, K010,
K019.K029
F025, K021,
K073
F039, U027
F039, U045
F039
F039, U075
K018, K028
F039, U076
K01S, K019,
K020, K029
F025
F039, U077
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<10.0
<10.0
<2.0
<2.0
-------
Table 5-1 (Continued)
'•'''"•-" -ir.-ri-- +- -r.A -:...._'__'.
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
1,1-Dichloroclhylcne
/
trans- 1,2-Dichloro-
cthylenc
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
cis- 1,3-Dichloropropenc
trans-1,3-
Dichloropropene
Hexachloroethane
Hexachloropropene . .
lodotncthane
fm ' ii»-,ii.i,iirBi...-,»jaS
U)
Treatment
Standard
(•ng/kj)
, 6.0
6.2*
33
33
18
18
18
28
28
30
19
28
.65
U)
Waste Coded)
--"• - -"" -VI
(3)
Concentration
fa Treated
Wa*te
(«|/kf)
W
Tne*ta**T«*f
Vnm Wfcfcfc the
PttfemuMttDtU*
WereTrai*f«rred
(5)
Coatfltoeot Fron Wikk the
C^MKtMratiiMbTMiiM
WarieWajTraatftrrrf
HaJogenated Volatlles (Cont'd.)
K029
P025
F039, U078
R)39, U079
R)39, K017,
U083
F039, U084
F039;U084
P039, U131
K016, K018,
K095, KQ19,
K028, K030
F025, K073
K030
F039, U243 .
F039, U138
<2.0
<2.0
<10.0
<10.0
j>
f^f<
Z8
2.8
2,8
2£
2.8
2.8
1A.
2,8
2.8
2£
2.8
2.8
2.8
NRJ-073
Of.29-01 nrj
< - Indicates a detection limit value.
•See Table 5-2 for more information on treatment tests.
'Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
This number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
'See notes at end of this table. 5-22
-------
Table 5-1 (Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
0)
Treatment
Standard
(rag/kg)
0)
Waste Cwfefs)
(3)
Coacentntioa
in Treated
Watte
(ng/kt)
W)
TmtMMtTMf
From WUcfc the
P^orataffceDaU*
WereTraaferred
(5)
Caftftitaent fnm WUch tt>e
Coactatf «Uo« ia Trttted
Watte Was TnBsferred
(0
ComtitwsrtFromWUca
tb* AccwMy Cwrmttwt
tn
Atxmtny
c*ttt*&m
Factor
(Matri* Spate %
l^ewtfert)
HalogenatedVol5tlles(Cont'd.)
Methylene Chloride
/
4,4-Mclhylenc-bis-2-
chloroanilinc
Pentachlorocthane
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloro-
ethane
1,1,2,2-
Tetrachloroethane
31d
33
35
5.6
5.6
42
5.6
42
F025
F039, K086,
U080, F001-
F005
F039, U158
K018, K028,
K030, K095,
K096
K028, K095,
K0%
P039, U208
K020, K028,
K095, K096
F039, U209
<10.0
<10.0
<10.0
<2.0
<2.0
<10.0
<2.0
<10.0
K019
K001-PCP
K001-PCP
K019
K019
K001-C
K019
K001-C
Methylene chloride
. Methylene chloride
4,4-Methylene-bis-2-
chloroaniline
bis(2-Chloroethyl)
ether
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
Ul,2-
Tetrachloroethane
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
1,1,2,2-
Tetrachloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
Trichloroethyiene
Di-n-
propyhutrosamine
bis(2-Chloroethyl)
ether
bis(2-
CUoroethyl)ether
Trichloroethyiene
.bis(2-
Chloroethyl)ether
Trichtoroethylene
1.1 (91)'
• 1.19 (84)°
1.23 (81)«
1 (103)
1(103)
1.49 (67)'
1(103)
1.49 (67)'
'&
-WV|
MfcuJiik. r
' "Tf,
^£
2A I
2.8 i
i.
2J
2.8
18
2^
2^
2.8
NRJ-073
Of,29-01.nij
< - Indicates a detection limit value.
•See Table 5-2 for more information on treatment tests.
'Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
This number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
'See notes at end of this table. 5-23
-------
Table 5-1 (Continued)
-•-
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
'
Telrachloroethylene
/
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
(1)
Treatment
Standard
(tng/kg)
5.6
6.0
6.2?
5.6
6.0
6.2
5.6
6.0
6.*
5.6
(2)
Waste CodeM
F039, U210,.
FOOI-F005
K016, K019,
K020, K028,
K030, K095,
K096
K073
F039, K086,
U226, P001-
F005
K018, K019,
K028, K029
K073
F039, U227,
F001-F005
K028, K095,
K096
F025
F001-F005,
F025, F039,
K086, U228,
K095, K096
(3)
Concentration
fa Treated
Watte
(«B/il)
(4)
TrMtatattTetf
FrocaWMcktko
PerfoneaBC* Data*
WereTHNttftrred
w
CwKtftwfit From WMcfc tie
Cooteatr atkm fa Trtoted
Watte Was Trwferfed
W
CMMMMitFrwaWkick
tlM Attxntf Comttkm
D*U Wert Trmfetirtd
Halogenated Volatila (Cont'd.) v
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
K019
K019
K019
K019
K019
K019
K019
K019
K019
K019
Tetrachloroethylene
Tetrachloroethylene
Tetrachloroethylene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Trichloroethylene
Tetrachloroethylene
Tetrachloroethylene
Trichloroethylene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Tetrachloroethylene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
m
Amurae? .
Ctntdki
Factor
(MaUfctSjfia*
facnferjr)
1(107)«
1.06 (94)
1.1 (91)'
1(107)'
1.06(94)
1.1 (91)'
1(107)*
1.06 (94)
1.1 (91)'
1 (107)"
,;
If
5
VttMtti
r«t^::
i J
2^
2^ "
18
Z8
2.8
18
2,8
2.8
2.8
2.8
NRJ-073
0629-01. nrj
< - Indicates a detection limit value.
•See Table 5-2 for more information on treatment tests.
'Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor; and variability factor.
This number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
JSee notes at end of this table. 5-24
-------
Table 54 (Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
Trlchloromonofluoro-
mcthanc
l<2,3-Trichloropropane
l,l,2-Trichloro-l,2,2-
trifluoroclhanc
Vinyl Chloride
(1)
Treatment
Standard
fag/kg)
33
28
28
6.0
33
. (2)
Waite Coded)
(3)
Concentration
' in Treated
Watte
(Ml/kg)
(4)
TreatnefltTeit*
From Which the
PerfontunceData'
WmTitaMfemd
(5)
Cowrtitaflttt From Wfckfc the
Concentration fa Treated
Halogenated VoIaUles (Cont'd.)
F039, U121,
F001-F005
F039, K017
F001-F005,
F039
. K029
F025, F039,
U043
<10.0
<10.0
<10.0
<2.0
<10.0
K001-C "'
K019
K019
K019
K001-C
Trichloromonofluoro-
tnethane
Hexachloroethane
Hcxachloroethane
Chloroform
Vinyl Chloride
A
".• ::-:;:-
.•^ if •
CeMtitaiitifamWUck
tl»A«««ty CorrediMi
DtitYtttiTtaatentA
-v. ••x^m
••.•$'.* x&m
1,1-Dichloroethylene
Hexachloroethane
Hexachloroethane
Chloroform •
1,1-Dichloroethylene
an
Accuracy
Corredktt
Factor
CMtabfa8$ito*
ttocOvety)
1.16 (86)"
1 (103)
1(103)
1.06 (94)
1.16 (86)°
OBktOOTMB
' «
-------
Table 5-1 (Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
(I)
Treatment
Standard
(mg/kj)
a>
Waste Coded)
0)
Concentratkm
ta Treated
Waste
(a.f/k|)
(0
TreotatatTe**
FrooaWMckA*
PetfomaMCeData^
Were Traatf erred
«
Cw»ttitm«ai FIWB Wifck tte
(0
CtMitwMtrnmWktck
tkt Atcwaty Cwrredtui
tn
»s«
^
2-scc-Bulyl-4,6-
dinilrophenol (Dinoseb)
CrCsol (m- and p-
isomers)
o-Crcsol
2,4-Dimethyl phenol
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresoI
2,4-Dinitrophenol
(o)2-Nitrophenol
(p)4-Nitrophenol
2.5
3.2 "
5.6
14
160
5.6
160
13
29
F039, POM
F039, U052,
F001-F005
F039, U052,
F001-F005
F039, U101
F039, P047
K103, K104
F039.P048
K102
F039.U170
<0.36
-------
Table 5-1 (Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
(1)
Treatment
Standard
(»g/kg)
(2)
Waste Coded) .
(3)
Coitccntrfttion
fa Treated
Waste
<«g/kf)
(4)
I
Treatment Tetf
From Wttch the
PerformatKeDatV
WereTttatrierred
(S)
CoMtfhteat from Wtfch flu
Cf.29-0l.nrj
< '- Indicates a detection limit value.
•See Table 5-2 for more information on treatment tests.
"Performance data consist of the concentratign in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
This number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
'See notes at end of this table. 5-27
-------
Table 5-1 (Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
(1)
Treatment
Standard"
(rug/kg)
P)
Wwte Coded)
(3)
Concentration
{•Treated
Watte
(•g/*!)
V)
Trc*raMa*TM*
FrooiWMcklk*
PerfomttKtDMi^ .
WereTraaKftrred
w
Cmutftacut From Wifcfc (to
CoaKtttratiM fa TfttMl
Wa«U»Wa«TraMfeTrt«[
W
CMtkMtF^iWUch
tM A&umtty Ctnttatu
DtAt^rtttttwttttn^i
tn
Accuracy
Cwttdta*
Factor
(Ma(ri*8»itl*
R*t*r(sty)
» •'.'
V*ri*4Hty
Orprao-Broralnes •.&; . .
Bromodichloromelhane
Brnmoform
(Tribromomcthanc)
Bromomclhanc
4-Bromophcnyl. phcnyl
ether
Chlorodibromomethane
l,2-Dibromo-3-
chloropropane
Dibromomethane
tris-(2,3-Dibromopropyl)
phosphate
Ethylene Dibromide
( 1 ,2-Dibromoethane)
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
0.10
15
F039
F039, U225
F039, U029,
K1I7, K118,
K131, K132,
K136
F039, U030
F039
F039, U066
P039, U068
U235
F039, U067,
K117, K118,
K136
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
• <5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<0.034
<5.0
EDB Test Bum
EDB Test Burn
EDB Test Burn
EDB Test Bum
EDB Test Burn
EDB Test Burn
EDB Test Burn
K037
EDB Test Burn
Ethylene Dibromide
Ethylene Dibromide
Ethylene Dibromide
Ethylene Dibromide
Ethylene Dibromide . .
Ethylene Dibromide
Ethylene Dibromide
Disulfoton
Ethylene Dibromide
Ethylene Dibromide
Ethylene Dibromide
Ethylene Dibromide
Ethylene Dibromide
Ethylene Dibromide
Ethylene Dibromide
Ethylene Dibromide
Disulfoton
Ethylene Dibromide
1.08 (93)*
1.08 (93)'
1.08(93)'
1.08 (93)«
1.08(93)"
1.08 (93)°
1.08 (93)'
1.10 (91)'
1.08 (93)e
2JB
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
18
2.8
NRJ-073
()f.29-0l.nrj
< - Indicates a detection limit value.
•See Table 5-2 for more information on treatment tests.
'Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
This number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
'See notes at end of this table. 5-28
-------
Table 5-1 (Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
(I)
Treatment
Standard
(rag/kg)
(2)
Waste Coded)
(3)
Concentration
in Treated
Waste
(•ng/kg)
(4)
Treatment Tert*
From Which the
PerfonuaaceData*
Were Trtttnand
(5)
1
Constituent Fran Whfck the
Concentration fa Treattd
Warte Was Transferred
(0
CottttMNtrnMiWUch
the Accuracy Ctmdton
Datt Wtt* tlradtftfrtd
Organo-Nltrogen Compounds
Acctonilrilc
Z^Acclylaminofluorcnc
Acrylamide
Acrylonilrile
Aniline
p-Chloroaniline
1,4-Dinitroben/ene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Di-n-propylnitrosaminc
1.8
140
23
84
5.6
14
14
16
2.3
140
28
14
K011, K013,
K014
F039, U005
K011, K013,
K014
F039, U009
K103, K104
F039, U012
K083
F039, P024
F039
F039, U105,
Kill
F039,U106,
Kill
F039, Ulll
<0.5
<50
<6.5
<30
<2.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<0.3375
<50
<10.0
<5.0
K011, K013,
K014
K001-PCP
K011, K013,
K014
K102
K019
K019
K019
K001-PCP
3rd 3ri Test Burn
(Test 1)
K019
K019
K019
Acetonitrile
2-Acetylaminofluorcne
Acrylamide
Acryionitrile
Naphthalene
Aniline
Aniline
p-Chloroaniline
1,4-Dinitrobenzene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
' 2,6-Dinitrotoluene .
Di-n-propylnitrosamine
Acetonitrile
Acenaphthene
Acrylamide
1,1-Dichloroethylenc
Naphthalene
4-Nitrophenol
Nitrobenzene
4-Nitrophenol
Dinoseb
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Di-n-
propylnitrosamine
(7)
Accuracy
Corrtdttwt
Factor
(MrtrixSplto*
ft«*o»*r»
1.27(79)°
1 (120)"
1.27(79)°
1(126)°
1 (103)
1.03 (97)"
1 (103)
1.11 (90)°
2.44 (41)°
1 (107)°
1(107)° .
1 (120)°
m'}
*'A
-f
Vtrfatal
f***,.
2$ !
j
2.8 {
u\
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2^
2 A
Z8
2.8
2.8
NRJ-D73
0629-01.nrj
< - Indicates a detection limit value.
•See Table 5-2 for more information on treatment tests.
••Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy contction factor, and variability factor.
This number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
'See notes at end of this table. 5-29
-------
Table 5-1 (Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
(I)
Treatment
Standard
(tog/kg)
n
Waste Coded)
0)
Concentration
ns Treated "
Watte
W
From Wile*. Ike
PtrforauttttData*
WereTrMtfond
(5)
CtmtttMBt From Wlick Qw
Watte WaiTnfflferred
<«
m
Accmraey
Ttdtr
R«t«ttt}t
Organo-NItrogea Compounds (Cont'd.) 'M^
Diphcnylamine/
Diphcnylnitrosamine
Methacrylonitrile
.Melhapyrilcnc •
(o)2-Nitroaniline
(p)4-Nitroani!ine
Nitrobenzene
5-Nitro-o-toIuidine
N-Nitroso-di-n-
hutylamine
N-Nitrosomethyl-
elhylamine
• 14
13
84
1.5
14
28
5.6
14
14
28
17
. 2.3
K083 '
K022
F039, U152
R)39, U155
K101
P039, P077
K103, K104
P039, K086,
U169, F001-
F005
K083
F039, U181
F039, U172
F039.
<5.0
<3.1
<30
<0.36
<2.0
<10.0
<2.0
<5:o
<5.0
<10.0
<5.0
<0.3375
K019
K022
K102
3* 3* Test Burn
(Test 2)
K101
K019
K019
K019
K019
K001-PCP
K001-PCP
3rf 3ri Test Burn
(Testl)
Nitrobenzene
Diphenylamine/
Diphenylnitrosamine
Methacrylonitrile
Methapyrilene
(o)2-Nitroaniline
(p)4-Nitroaniline
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
Nitrobenzene
5-Nitro-o-toluidine
N-Nitroso-di-n-
butylamine
N-Nitrosotnethyl-
ethylamine
Nitrobenzene
Diphenylamine/
Diphenylnitrosamine
1,1-Dichloroethylene
Pronamide
(o)2-Nitroaniline
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Naphthalene
4-Nitrophenol
Nitrobenzene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Di-n-
propyinitrosamine
Dinoseb
1(103)
1^4(65)
1 (126)'
1.45 (69)«
2.5 (40)
1(107)°
1(103)
1.03 (97)«
1 (103)
1 (120)"
1.23 (81)°
2.44
r«^|
. .../.JJIJWy.
^
18
18
2.8
2.8
18
18
18
18
18
18
18
NRJ-073
(1629-01.nij
< - Indicates a detection limit value.
•See Table 5-2'for more information on treatment tests.
'Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
This number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
notes at end of this table. - 5-30 '
-------
Table 5-1 (Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
(1)
Treatment
Standard
(mi/kg)
. fl)
Waste Coded)
(3)
Concentration
' in Treated
Watte
(«g/k|)
(4)
Treatment Test*
From Wkfch the
Perfonuance Data'
WereltMttfemd
(5)
Comtitaeat Fran Whfcfc the
Concentration ia Tititod
Wute Was Trauferrtd
(0
Cowtfeieitltatt Which
tlw Atetttty CeitectiMi
Organo-Nltrogeta Compounds (Cont'rL)
N-Nkrosomorphpline
'N-Nitrosopipcridine
N-Nitrosopyrrolidinc
N-Nitrosodiethylamine
Phenacetiri ~
Pronamide
Propanenitrile (Ethyl
Cyanide)
Pyridine
2.3
35
35
28
16
1.5
360
16
F039
F039, U179
F039, U180
R)39, U174
F039, U187
F039, U192
F039, P101
F039, U196,
F001-F005
<0.3375
<10.0
<10.0
<10.0
<5.0
<0.33
<100
<5.0
3ri 3" Test Bum
CTcst 1)
K001-PCP
K001-PCP
K019
K001-PCP
yi 3rf TMt Bufn
(Test 2) .
K019
K001-PCP
N-Nitrosomorpholine
N-Nitrosopiperidine
N-Nttrosopyrrolidine
N-Nitrosodiethylamine
Phenacetin
Pronamide
Propanenitrile (Ethyl
Cyanide)
Pyridine
Dinoseb
Di-n-
propyinitrosambe
Di-n-
propylnitrosamine
Di-n-
propylnitrosamine
4-Nitrophenol
Pronamide
1,1-Dichloroethylene
Benzene
an
Accuracy
Coirtdlo*
Factor " "
CWWrbSpJk^
2.44
1.23 (81)'
1.23 (81)*
1 (120)*
1.11 (90)°
1.45(69)'
1.28 (78)"
1.14 (88)°
<*)
^
Varf*M
PW*
^
2.8
j
r...
18
2.8
2,8
2J;
2|*
21
•ii •
NRJ-07.1
(lf.29-01.nrj
< - Indicates a detection limit value.
•See Table-5-2 for more information on treatment tests.
Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
This- number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
'vSee notes at end of this table. 5-31
-------
Table 54 (Continued)
Constituent Selected Tor
Regulation
(I)
Treatment
Standard
(mg/kg)
(2)
Waste Coded)
a)
Concentration
inTretted
Wwle
(ag/kt)
(0
TftMtetMtTaf
FnmWUckto
PerTorMtttctttet**
Were TfMnfenreQ
w
Coattiteeat Fran WHcfc tike
Conee*tratkm k Treated
Wa*te W*s Trwuf erred
-..w
CMitlUrtFrtrnWilck
th& HUMttty CttKttWHt
bttm Wen TnMtfemJ
Organo^uiror Pesticides ?
Disulfolnn
. /
Famphur
Methyl Paralhion
Parathion
Phorate
0.1
6.2
15
0.1
4.6
0.1
4.6
0.1
0.1
4.6
K036, K037,
P039
F039
F039
P097
F039
P071
P039
.P089
K038, K040,
P094
P039
<0.0335
<2.0
<5.0
< 0.0335
<1.5
<0.0335
<1.5
<0.0335
<0.0335
<1.5
K037
Leachate Data
Leachate Data
K037
Leachate Data
K037
Leachate Data
K037
K037
Leachate Data
Disulfoton
Disulfoton
Famphur
Disulfoton
Methyl Parathion
Disulfoton
Parathion
Disulfoton
Disulfoton
Phorate
Disulfoton
Disulfoton
Famphur
Disulfoton
Parathion
Disulfoton
Parathion •
- Disulfoton
Disulfoton
Phorate
w
AcctttTAcy
ir*^i1
V*Wty
- %
18
2.8
2.8
2.8
W
18
18
18
18
18
NIU-073
0629-01. nrj
< - Indicates a detection limit value.
•See Table 5-2 for more information on treatment tests.
'Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
This number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
'See notes at end of this table. 5-32
-------
Table 5-1 (Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
(1)
Treatment
Standard
(mg/kg)
(2)
Waste Code(s)
(3)
Cottcentratloa
in Treated
Waste
(mg/fcg)
ft
TreatNMtTcst*
From Which the
Performance Data*
Were Trtwferred
(5)
Constituent Fran Wttcll nw
ConcentratwB b Treated
Waste Wat Tnuufmwl
Oxygenated Hydrocarbons
Acetone
Acetophenone
n-Butanol
2-Chloronaphthalene
Cyclohexanone
1,4-Dioxane
Ethyl Acetate
Ethyl Ether
Ethyl Methacryiate
Isobutanol
Isosafrole
160
9.7
19
2.6
5.6
0.75"
170
33
160
160
170
2.6
F039, K086,
U002, F001-
F005
F039, U004,
K086
K022
F039, K086,
U031, P001-
F005
F039, U047
F001-F005
F039, U108
F039, K086,
U112, F001-
F005
F039, U117,
F001-F005
F039, U118
F039, U140,
F001-P005
F039, U141
<50
<2.0
<4.4
<0.4
<2.0
0.14d
<60
<10.0
<50
<50
<60
<0.36
K001-C
K102
K022
(Tertl) Ufn
K019
F001-F005
K102
K001-C
K001-PCP
K001-C
K102
"JiA "ttd TAM* Rurn
J j 1 Gal OUl D
(Test 1)
Acetone
Acetophenone
Acetophenone
n-Butanol
2-CUoronaphthalene
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
1,4-Dioxane
Ethyl Acetate
Ethyl Ether
Ethyl Methacryiate
Isobutanol •
Isosafrole
«
Coarttet
-------
Table 5-1 (Continued)
— , „ , .. _..-!.....
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
Mcthanol
Methyl EthyLKctone
Methyl Isobutyl Kctone
Methyl Methacrylate
Safrole
(0
Treatment
Standard
0.75d
36
33
160
22
=====
P>
Waste Coded)
F001-F005
F039, K086,
U159, F001-
F005
F039, K086,
DIM, F001-
F005
F039, U162
F039, U2Q3
— •'" '• i- i il SS
"Will •MBSESCH
(3)
CwKtntrttion
in Treated
Watte
Oxy
0.14*
<10.0
<10.Q
<50
<5.0
ssssssmsmmmmmmfmm
FrcwWhtdhUM
WereTnMtfetred
Cemtfhwit Tnm Wklcfc (fee
CwKCBtratiMi fa Treated
WtXeWMTnuMfetml
genated Hydrocarbons (Ctat'd.)
F001-F005
K019
K001-PCP
K001-C
K102
Methyl Ethyl Kctone
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methyl Isobutyl Kctone
Methyl Methacrylate
Safrole
' W
sssi?SnS,i
No accuracy correction
data were used
1,1-Dichloroethyfene
Trichloroethylene
1,1-Dichloroethylene
p-Chloro-m-cresol
"""-1" ' 'BBgMMMIgBg^geaji-. i «—
0
Aon
Conn
Fac
(Matrix
Rtftw
-
1.28|
1.19 (
1.16 (
1.56 (
9)
534
18
2,8
NRJ-OB
062'J-Olnrj
< - Indicates a detection limit value.
•See Table 5-2 for more information on treatment tests.
'Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor
ITjis number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
dSee notes at end of this table. 5-34
-------
Table 5-1 (Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
! Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
Hexachlorodibenzo-
furans
Hexachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxins
Pentachlorodibenzo-
furans
(1)
Treatment
Statrdard
(ing/leg)
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
0.92
1.8
i.8
0.001
0.001
0.001
W
Waste Coded)
F039, K085
F039, K085
F039, K085
F039, K085
F039, K085
F039, K085
F039, K085
F039
F039
F039
0)
Concentration
in Trotted
Watte
(«ng/k8)
<0.065
<0.065
<0.065
<0.065
<0.065
<0.13
<0.13
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
W
TreataaetttTesf
From WUct the
Performance DaU'
WereTnuBferred
(5).
I
Coastituint From Wfifcfc tte
Conc«ntra(km in t retted
Waste Was Transfetted
PCBa and Dlorins
3ri 3ri Test Burn
(Test2)
3rf 3rd Test Burn
(Test 2)
3ri 3rt Test Burn
(Test 2)
3rf y* Test Burn
(Test 2)
3rf 3rd Test Burn
(Test 2)
3"1 3"* Test Burn
(Test 2)
3rt 3" Test Bum
(Test 2)
Dioxfos Rule
Dioxins Rule
Dioxuis Rule
Methoxychlor
Methoxychlor
Methoxychlor
Methoxychlor
Methoxychlor
Methoxychlor
Methoxychlor
-
•
-
W
CeMtilwatFrooWUch
ttw Atttlfat)' CofMtttiwi
D««iWt«TraBrferrtd
•.
Methoxychlor
Methoxychlor
Methoxychlor
Methoxychlor
Methoxychlor
Methoxychlor
Methoxychlor
-
-
m
Aowmy
Corrttti0B
, Vector
(M*lri» Spike*
Rtrtfeiy)
5(20)^
5 (20)^
5(20)^
5(20)°^
5(20)°^
5(20)^
5 (US)"4
-
•
jpi
' *5I
, '
2^ f
2.8
2.8
Z8
2^ i
MWIIEMBMMHBMM*
2.8
- !
•a^M*MMM*"^
NRJ-073
H629-01.nrj
< - Indicates a detection limit value.
•See Table 5-2 for more information on treatment tests.
Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuncy correction factor, and variability factor
This number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
JSee notes at end of this table. . 5.35
-------
Table 5-1 (Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
(1)
Treatment
Standard
(mg/lg)
P)
Waste Cod<{0
0)
CcMcentratka
in Traded
Watte
(«g/kl)
w
Tre«t»«lT«f
FrcmWUckdM
Performance Data'
WeraTrMttltrred
(5)
CoMtkMM Fnw WUck.tiu)
CooceBtratiwi b TrtMwl
Wad* Wtt TnuMferreJ
PCBs *nd iHoxtas (Cont'd.) |'
Pentachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxins
Tjztrachlorodibenzo-
furans
Tetrachlorodibcnzo-p-
dioxins
0.001
0.001
0.001
F039
F039
P039
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
Dioxins Rule
Dioxins Rule
Dioxins Rule
•"
-
-
:::.«
IMta WeM TraMferred
j, "-
•
-
-
TO
Awartejr
Factor
%
-
-
-
"-«"&
i
...:.,;..!.;>!'
-
.
-
NRJ-073
0629-0 l.nrj
< - Indicates a detection limit value.
•See Table 5-2 for mote information on treatment tests.
'Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
'This number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
'See notes at end of this table. • • 5-36
-------
Table 5-1 (Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
Butyl Benzyl Phthalatc
Didthyl Phthalate
Dimethyl Phthalatc
Di-n-butyl Phthalatc
Di-n-octyl Phthalatc
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)
phthalate
Phthalic Anhydride (as
measured by phthalic
acid)
U)
Treatment
Standard
(mgfltg)
.7.9
28
-28
28
28
28
28
««V^— *MH^^_^^
(2)
Waste Code(s)
F039, K086
F039, K086,
U088
F039, K086,
U102
F039, K086,
U069
F039, K086,
U107
P039, K086,
U028
K023, K024,
K093, K094,
U190
0)
Concentration
• in Treated
Watte
C«g/kg)
3.67
<8.2
<8.2
<8.2
<8.2
<8.2
<8.2
(4)
Treatment Test*
From Which the
Performance fata*
WereTrtatfernd
Phthalates
K019
K024
K024
K024
K024
K024
K024
==ManB3=B=i—
-------
Table 54 (Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
(1)
Treatment
Stawtord
(rag/kg)
m
Waste Coded)
(3)
CoQcecdTtkn
{•Treated
Wade
(mg/4)
tf)
I
TKateMtTMr
From WMch (he
FerforMtMK*Dtt*k
Wero TrMkfcffxnd
(5)
CMtttteentrroawudi&e
CooctntnttiM (a TreU«d
Wutfe W« Tnaufeitt4
Polynndear Aromatic Hydrocarbons : -:;•_;
Acenaphthalenc
Accnaphthene
/
Anthracene
Benz(a)anthraccnc
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Chrysene
Dihenz(a,h)anthracene
3.4
3.4
4.tf
• 3.4
4.0*
3.4
8.2
3.6'
3.4
8.2
3.4
3.4
1.5d
3.4
8.2
3.4
8.2
F039, K087
K035
, F039
K015, R035
F039
K035
F039, U018
K060
K035
F039, U022
F039, K015
• F039, K015
F039
K035, K087
F039, U050
K035
F039, U063
<1.0
<1.0
<0.65
<1.0
<0.65
<1.0
. <1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0336
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
K087
K087
K001-C
K087
K001-C
K087
K087
K087
K087
K087
K087
K087
F024
K087
K087
K087
K087
Acenaphthalene
Fluorene
Acenaphthene
Anthracene
Anthracene
Benz(a)anthracene
Benz(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Beozo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Chrysene
Chrysene
Indeno(l,2r3-cd)pyrene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
W
c**tomin*vntA
timActxtKjCtntt&m
Vtt$ WerttnaMferrti
I'-''"- ::;:Cl¥-'"v:. '••:.;
Acenaphthalene
• Fluorene
Acenaphthene
' Anthracene
Anthracene
Benz(a)anthracene
Pyrene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Pyrene •
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylenc
Chrysene
Pyrene
Indeno(l£,3-cd)pyrene
Pyrene
W.
ACCttTflCjT
Ctfrtdi*!
• ntcter.
(M*trf«S»ate*
HJtkmtfy)
1.22 (82)
1.22 (82)
2.17 (46)
1.22 (82)
2.17 (46)
1.22 (82)
2.94 (34)'
1.29 (82)
1.22(82)
2.94 (34)«
1.22 (82)
1.22 (82)
1.61 (62)
1.22 (82)
2.94 (34)"
1.22 (82)
2.94 (34)°
.•••*:•!!
*>
. *»
v**t%
r«5.T
f
"•**
2A
2&
2.8
Z8
18
18
2.8
18
2.8
2.8
18
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
NRI-073
11629-01.nrj
< - Indicates a detection limit value.
•See Table 5-2 for more information on treatment tests.
'Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy conection factor, and variability factor.
This number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
'See notes at end of this table. ' 5-38
-------
Table 5-1 (Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
Fluoranthene
Fluorcrte
lndcno(l,2,3-c,d)pyrene
3-Methylcholanthrene .
Naphthalene
(l)
Treatment
Standard
(mg/bg) ':-,:-
3.4
8.2
3.4
4.tf
3.4
8.2
15
1.5
3.1
3.4
5.6
(«
*( '
Waste Coded)
<3)
Concentration
fa Treated
Waste
(ng^O
<4)
Treatment Teit*
FromWhfchtk*
Perfonaaactbata'
WeraTr«itt(eriled
'. (»• J}:V
;•: :•••-- '
|||i;
CoMtihwrtFrofflWUitfca
Coneentratioo fa ttHiiA '
Waste Was TransftrrMl
. Polynuclear Aromfttic J^jfdiibiiilkMii (Cortt'd.) ^^ •'
K035, K087
P039.U120
K035
F039
K035, K087
F039, U137
F039, U157
K001, U051
K086, F039,
U165
K035, K060,
K087
K019
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<0.65
<1.0
<1.0
<5.0
<05
<1.0
<1.0
<2.0
K087
K087
K087
K001-C
K087
K087
K001-PCP
K001-PCP
K087
K087
K019
Fluoranthene
Pluoranthene
Fluorene
Fluorene
Indeno(l,2,3-c,d)pyrene
Indeno(l,2,3-c,d)pyrene
3-Methylcholanthrene
Naphthalene
Naphthalene
Naphthalene
Naphthalene
(0
CwattttoHt|irwiW|ttA
flte Attnattet Cttrredlwi
D*4aWer*Tratrftrr«d
Fluoranthene
Pyrene ;
Fluorene
Fluorene
Indeno(l,2,3-
c,d)pyrcne
Pyrene
Pyrene
Naphthalene
Acenaphthene
Naphthalene
Naphthalene
m
Accmracjr
Cttttdkat
Factwr ..
Qntttfit8jli0t,£
'"i-
1.22 (82)
2.94 (34)*
122 (82)
117(4(5)
1.22 (82)
2.94 (34)*
1.04 (%)•
1.06 (94)
1.1 (91)°
1.22(82)
1(103)
A 11
K^^*??
'""'"'?;WW
f-- ^
u"'t"T
2.8 ff
18." 1
- 18 "|
1 . <.,'i,
18 1
' -ft
M.|
1
!'
18 8
18 1
?'8"l
'I
18 !i
1
9R ;'
' Mf
isi
, — . ^_
NRJ-073
(lf.29-ni.nrj
< - Indicates a detection limit value.
•See Table 5-2 for more information on treatment tests.
'Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
This number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
'See notes at end of this table. , 5-39
-------
Table 5-1 (Continued)
=======s==
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
Phcnanthrcne
f
Pyrene
^g=^->- ~~rrr
. .•. -. i -. ,-
(i)
Treatment
Standard
(tug/kg)
1.5 '
• •
3.1
3.4
5.6
1.5
8.2
===========
(2)
Waste Code«
•
K001, U051
F039
K015, K035,
K087
K019
K001, U051
K035, P039
• •• • i i. i. iii'.iBSa
~T"
MnKemuauwi
fa Treated
Waste
dag/kf)
a^Hoa^MMHMMHim^Mi
TrectaMktTeff
FromWWcklko
PttfoniUMcebtU^
Were Trtrttf erred
f^"™*™*
(5)
WarieW«*Tntaif«rtd
Polynudear AronuUlc Hydrocwbons (Cont'd.)
<0.5
<1.0
<1.0
<2.0
<0.5 .
-------
Table 5-1 (Continued)
Notes;
Accnaphthcnc
Anthracene
Aroclor 1016-1260
Bcn/o(a)pyrcne
Bcn/o(ghi)pi:rylcnc
Carbon Bisulfide
Carbon Tctrachloridc
Chlordane
Chlorobenzene
Chloroform
In calculating the F039 treatment standard, the practical quantification limit (PQL) was used instead of the method detection limit. Since the PQLl
characteristically five times greater than the detection limit, the F039 treatment standard is high by a factor of five, and should have been 0.8 mg/k|
In calculating the F039 treatment standard, the PQL was used instead of the method detection limit. Since the PQL is characteristically five times
greater than the detection limit, the F039 treatment standard is high by a factor of five, and should have been 0.8 mg/kg. j
The matrix spike percent recovery for methoxychlor in the 3" 3" Test Burn Test 2 was below 20%. Matrix spike recoveries of less than 20% are 4
acceptable and are not used to correct detection limits. Since acceptable recoveries were not available for this constituent or any phenojwacetic acid
herbicides from 3rf 3"1 Test Burn Test 2, a recovery of 20% was used for methoxychlor. . ]
I-
Thc accuracy correction factor used in the K060 treatment standard was transferred incorrectly from the K087 treatment test. The accuracy correct!
factor was incorrectly transferred from phenol (1.29) instead of from the average of the semivolatile constituents (1.21). The correct KQ60 treatmcn
standard should have been 3.4 mg/kg.' , f
, • ' . . . . 'I
In calculating the F039 treatment standard, the incorrect accuracy correction factor Was used (1.61). The correct accuracy correction factor was fror
the scmivolalile base/neutral constituents (1.90), yielding a treatment standard of 1.8 mg/kg.
The concentration in the treated waste and treatment standard for F001-F005 wastes represents the concentration in the TCLP extract.
The accuracy correction factors used in the F025, K021, and K073 treatment standards were transferred incorrectly from the K019 treatment test i
accuracy correction factor for the average of the semivolatile constituents was incorrectly transferred as 1.1 instead of 1.06. The correct treatment
standard should have been 6.0 mg/kg. j
To account for both the alpha and gamma isomers of chlordane, the concentration in the treated waste was doubled in calculating the K032 and KO
treatment standards. This accounts for the K032 and K097 treatment standards of 0.26 mg/kg as opposed to the F039 and U036 treatment standarc
of 0.13 mg/kg. . v ^|
in calculating the treatment standard for K019 wastes, the yariabUiiy factor, accuracy correction factor, and concentration in treated waste weie ^
incorrectly multiplied. The correct K019 treatment standard should have been 5.7 mg/kg. • • |
The accuracy correction factors used in the F025, K021, and K073 treatment standards were transferred incorrectly from the K019 treatment lest 1
accuracy correction factor for the average of the semivolatile constituents was incorrectly transferred as 1.1 instead of 1.06. The correct treatment'
standard should have been 6.0 mg/kg. *
Cyclohexanone The concentration in the treated waste and treatment standard for F001-F005 wastes represents the concentration in the TCLP extract.
NR.I-073
I«i29-0l.nrj
5-41
-------
Table 5-1 (Continued)
2,4-D
1,2-Dichlorocthanc
1,1-Dichlorocthylenc
Fluorcnp
Mcthanol
Methoxychlor
Mcthylene Chloride
Phenol
Phenol
Silvex (2,4,5-TP)
2,4,5-T
The matrix spike percent recovery for 2,4-D in the 3rf 3" Test Bum Test was below 20%. Matrix spike recoveries of less than 20% are not tecepttblo
and are not used to correct detection limits. Since acceptable recoveries were not available for this constituent or any phenoxyacetic acid herbicides
from y* y* Test Burn Test 2, a recovery of 20% was used for 2,4-D.
The accuracy correction factor used in the F025 treatment standard was transferred incorrectly from the K019 treatment test. The accuracy correction
factor for the average of the scmivolatile constituents was incorrectly transferred as 1.1 instead of 1.06. The correct treatment standard should have
been 6.0 mg/kg.
The accuracy correction factor used in the F025 treatment standard was transferred incorrectly from the K019 treatment test. The accuracy correction
factor for the average of the semivolatile constituents was incorrectly transferred as 1.1 instead of 1.06. The correct treatment standard should have
been 6.0 mg/kg. . _ ' .
In calculating the F039 treatment standard, the PQL was used instead of the method detection limit. Since the PQL is characteristically five times
greater than the detection limit, the F039 treatment standard is high by a factor of five, and should have been 0.8 mg/kg.
The concentration in the treated waste and treatment standard for F001-F005 wastes represents the concentration in the TCLP extract.
The matrix spike percent recovery for this constituent in the 31* 3" Test Bum Test 2 was below 20%. Matrix spike recoveries of less than 20% are not
acceptable and are not used to correct detection limits. Since acceptable recoveries were not available for this constituent or any phenoxyacetic acid
herbicides from 3ri 3ri Test Burn Test 2, a recovery of 20% was used for methoxychlor.
The accuracy correction factor used in the F025 treatment standard was transferred incorrectly from the K019 treatment test. The accuracy correction
factor for the average of the semivolatile constituents was incorrectly transferred as 1.1 instead of 1.06. The correct treatment standard should have
been 3.0 mg/kg. .
The accuracy correction factor used in the K060 treatment standard was transferred incorrectly from the R087 treatment test. The accuracy correction
factor was incorrectly transferred from the average of the semivolatile constituents (1.21) instead of from phenol (1.29). The correct K060 treatment
standard should have been 3.6 mg/kg. . .
The accuracy correction factor used in the K083 treatment standard was transferred incorrectly from the K019 treatment test. The accuracy correction
factor was incorrectly transferred as 1 when the correct value was 1.11. The correct K083 treatment standard should have been 6.2 mg/kg.
The matrix spike percent recovery for 2,4-D in the 31* 31* Test Burn Test was below 20%. Matrix spike recoveries of less than 20% are not acceptable
and are not used to correct detection limits. Since acceptable recoveries were not available for this constituent or any phenoxyacetic acid herbicides
from 3rf 3rd Test Burn Test 2, a recovery of 20% was used for 2,4-D.
The matrix spike percent recovery for 2,4-D in the 3rf 31* Test Burn Test was below 20%. Matrix spike recoveries of less than 20% are not acceptable
and are not used to correct detection limits. Since acceptable recoveries were not available for this constituent or any phenoxyacetic acid herbicides
from 3rt 3rd Test Burn Test 2, a recovery of 20% was used for 2,4-D.
NRJ-073
()r,29-01.nij
542
-------
Table 5-1 (Continued)
Tetrachloroelhylcnc
2,3,4,6-Tctrachloro-
phcnol
.The accuracy correction factor used in the K073 treatment standard was transferred incorrectly from the K019 treatment test. The accuracy correction
bcTf, OVCra8e Sem'Volatlle const'tuen's ™* incorrectly transferred as 1.1 instead of 1.06. The correct treatment standard should have
In calculating the F03'> treatment standard, the POL was used instead of the tnethod detection limit. Since the PQL is characteristically five times
greater than the detcchon lim.t, the P039 treatment standard is high by a factor of five, and should have been 0.8 mg/kg.
1,1,1-Trichloroethane The accuracy correction factor used in the K073 treatment standard was transferred incorrectly from the K019 treatment test. The accuracy correction
factor for the average of the semivolatile constituents was incorrectly transferred as 1.1 instead of 1.06. The correct treatment standard should have
neen o.u mg/kg.
The accuracy correction factor used in the F025 treatment standard was transferred incorrectly from the K019 treatment test. The accuracy correction
bcene Omg/kgVera8C semivolatlle constltuen's was incorrectly transferred as 1.1 instead of 1.06. The correct treatment standard should have =
1,1,2-Trichlorocthane
2,4,5-Trichbrophenol In calculating the^treatment standard, the PQL was used instead of the method detection limit. Since the PQL is characteristically five times
greater than the dctect.on hm.t, the F039 treatment standard is high by a factor of five, and should have been 0.8 mg/kg.
2,4,6-Trichlorophcnol
Toxaphene
In calculating the F039 treatment standard, the PQL was used instead of the method detection limit. Since the PQL is characteristically five times
greater than the detcchon l,m,t, the F039 treatment standard is high by a factor of five, and should have been 0.8 mg/kg.
Treatment standards for toxaphene were based on the transfer of performance data from chlordane from the 3- 3- Test Burn Test 2. Because the
delect,on hm.ts or toxaphene are typically ten times greater than chlordane, the concentration in the treated waste for chlordane was multiplied by
e r? IK "1 f tn?phm ?" C8lCUlatl118 the K**2 "* K09? frcatment *-*•* *» concentration in the treatedlSe
This accounts for the K032andK097treatmentstandards of ,6
NRJ-073
(I629.ni.hrj
5-43
-------
Table 5-2
Treatment Tests from Which Treatment Performance Data for
Organic Constituents Were Used
Waste Tested
K001-PCP
(PcntachloTophcnoI)
K001-C (Creosote)
K011, K013, K014
K019
K022
K024
K037
K087
K101
K102
F001-F005
F024
3"* 3rd Multi-constituent
Pesticide Test Burn,
Test 1
(U141, U028, P020,
U122, U226, U239,
U080, U220, U166,
U161, U188)
y* 3" Multi-constituent
Pesticide Test Burn,
Test 2
(D014, D016, P059,
U127, U192)
Ethylene Dibromidc
(EDB) Test Burn
Lcachaie Data from
Treated Bio-Solids
I
Technology Used
Rotary Kiln Incineration
Rotary Kiln Incineration
Rotary Kiln Incineration
Rotary Kiln Incineration
Fuel Substitution*
Rotary Kiln Incineration
Rotary Kiln Incineration
Rotary Kiln Incineration
Rotary Kiln Incineration
Rotary Kiln Incineration
Incineration
Rotary Kiln Incineration
Rotary Kiln Incineration
Rotary Kiln Incineration
Rotary Kiln Incineration
Thermal Drying
On-Site Engineering
Report Reference(s)*
6
7
74
8
-
9
10
11
12
13
14
.15
16
16
17
18
v€;::; : . Background , . ?.,-.. .
Document Reference(s)
28
• 28
71
31
73
34
38
44
45
45
47
75
- .
•
-
-- .
"See list of references in Section 8.0.
'Incineration was also identified as BOAT for K022.
NRJ-073
0629.01.ni3
5-44
-------
Table 5-3
Treatment Performance Database for Metal
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
Antimony
Arsenic
/ \
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
(1)
Treatment
Standard:
Concentration
kTCLP
Extract (mg/L)
2.1
0.23
0.055
5.6
5.0
- -
7.6
52
0.014
0.19
0.066
0.14
(2)
Waste Coded)
K061
K021, F039
K061
K031, K084,
K101, K102,
P010, P011,
P036, P038,
U136
F039
K061
F039, P013
K061
K061
F006, F007,
F008, F009,
FOli, F012,
F039, K100
K069
(3)
Concentration
faTCLP
Extractor
Treated
Waste (mg/L)
0.655
<0.060
0.013
1.79
.
2.51
12.8
0.0073
<0.060
0.017
0.052
W-
Treatment Test'
From Which the
PerformutceData1
Went Transferred
K061-HRD
K019
K061-IMS
D004
Characteristic
Level for
Arsenic (D004)
K061-SKF
D005
K061-
INMETCO
K061-HRD
F006
K061
(Stabilization)
(5)
Constituent Fro* Which
the Concentration fa
Treated Waste Wat
Transferred
Antimony
Antimony
Arsenic
Arsenic
•
Barium
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Cadmium
Cadmium
- ,
Factor Wit Transferred
Antimony
Antimony
Arsenic
Arsenic
Barium
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Cadmium
Cadmium
Cfl
Atom**
Factor
(Matrix Spike*
Recorery)
1.09 (92)
1.35 (74)
1.14 (88)
1.11 (90)
1.08 (93)
1.18 (85)
1(100)
1.15 (87)
1.02 (97.9),
1.06 (94.3)
1.04 (96)
») I
•^
'i
VftyUbii
2.9
2.8
3.9
2.8
2.8
3.5
1.9
2.8
3.72
241
< - Indicates a value less than the detection limit.
'Sec Table 5-5 for more information on treatment tests. i
"Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
NRJ-073\0629-OI.nrj
5-45
-------
Table 5-3 (Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
Chromium (Total)
t
•-- .
Lead
.
— - -' — — — •
(I)
Treatment
Standard:
Concentration
lnTCLP
Extract (mg/L)
0.33
5.2
.
0.094
1.7
0.073
0.37
0.51
P)
Waste Codeb)
K061
F006, F007,
F008.F009,
F011, F012,
F019, F039,
K100, K061
(Stabilization),
K006
(Hydrated)
K002-K008,
K062, K086,
U032
K015, K048-
K052
F024, K028
K061
K001, K087,
K100, F006,
F007, F008,
F009, F011,
F012, F039,
U051, U144,
U145, U146,
P110
0)
CoocBJtrttion
faTCLP
Extractor
Treated
Waste (mg/L)
<0.080
0.57
0.052
1.14
0.018
<0.10
0.35
Fro* Which ike
PerfbmaKeDaia*
WeraTnMfemd
K061-HRD
F006
K062
K048-K052
F024
K061-HRD
F006
-
Cotutifeeat Fro* WMch
UwCottceatrfttittiitt
Treated Waste Wa*
Transferred
Chromium
Chromium
.
Chromium
Chromium
Chromium
Lead
Lead
4 .
the Atcaracjr Ctrmttdi
Factor W*i TraMfemi
Chromium
Chromium
'Chromium
Chromium
Chromium
Lead
Lead
TO
Accairacy
C«trectk«t
Factor ;. •
Rtwrary)
1.47 (68)
1.17 (85.8),
1.15 (86.6)
1.47 (68)
'
1.30(77)
1.15 (872)
132(76)
1.08 (92.9)
m <
fadar
7.94
129
1.14
3.5
18
137
< - Indicates a value less than the detection limit.
"See Table 5-5 for more information on treatment tests.
'Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
NRJ-073\f)f>29-01.nrj -
-------
Table 5-3 (Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
Lead (Continued)
/
Mercury
(1)
Treatment
Standard:
Cmtrentration
inTCLP
Extract (mg/L)
0,37
0.24
0.18
0.021
0.(XW
0.025
0.20
»>
Waste Code(s)
K002-K008,
K062, K086
K069
K046
K028
K061
K071, P039,
K 106 and UI51
(Low mercury,
non-RMERC
residues),
P065, P092
(Low mercury,
incinerator
residues)
K106, U151,
P065 and P092
(Low mercury,
RMERC
residues)
(3)
Concentration
inTCLP
Extract at
Treated
Waste (rng/L)
<0.10
0.095
0.078
0.008
<0.0030
0.0043
_
.
to
TrtfttmtBt Test*
Fran Which the
PerforrtaaceData*
K062
K061
(Stabilization)
K046
F024
K061-HRD
K071
Characteristic
Level for
Mercury (D009)
(5)
Constituent FitMB Wbtdt
the ConcentrttiM k
Treated Waste Wtt
Transfenrwl
Lead
Lead
Lead
Lead
Mercury
Mercury
CO
CMtttteMJtt fnm VWrfch
IheAcMMCjrCtmcdoti
Factor W« TnMderred
Lead
Lead
Lead
Lead
Mercury
Mercury
(7)
Attune?
Correction
ftctor
(MairtkSptk*%
Rewtwjf)
1.32 (76)
156(68)
130 (77)
1.28 (78.4)
1.05 (95)
1.05 (95)
.^,. ., ..
mk
f
v*A*i
F*ct«*
2^
2.74
1.76
2.0
2.8
5.4',
< - Indicates a value less than the detection limit.
"See Table 5-5 for more information on treatment tests.
I'erformance data consist of the concentration in treated, waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
NIU-n73\%29-Ol.nrj
. 5-47
-------
Table 5-3 (Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation .
Nickel
/
„
-
~-.
Selenium
Silver
•
(1)
Treatment
Standard:
Concentration
inTCLP
Extract (mK/L)
5.0
0.32
.
. 0.2
0.088
0.16
5.7
0.30
0.072
(2)
Waste Code(s)
K061
P006, F007,
F008, F009,
F011, F012,
F039, K115,
K061
(Stabilization)
P073, P074
K015, K048-
K052
F024, K028,
K083
K061
P039, P103,
P114, U204,
U205
K061
F006, F007,
F008, F009,
F011, F012,
P099, P104
0)
CooceotrtttM
faTCLP
Extract of
Treated
Waste (mg/L)
2.54
0.063
0.0733.
0.025
<0.05
0.67
<0.080
0.048
W
TrertBeatTw?
FrMM Wbkk the
Ferfbnaunce DtU*
Were Tnmf erred
K061-
INMETCO
F006
.
K048-K052
F024
K061-SKF
D010
K061-HRD
F006
t5)
CoMfKceat Fro* WUch
. Use C«Kentr»ti*a fa
Treated Waste Wat
Trusferred .
Nickel
Nickel
Nickel
Nickel
Selenium
Selenium
Silver
Silver
(0
CMttteiait Vkwn WUdi
Ae Atxmtttj CtrntttM
FacCer WM Tnwl erred
Nickel
. Nickel
Nickel
Nickel
Selenium
Selenium
Silver
Silver
m
Attar**
Cwrredk*
Fadtr ::. •
(Meliit Spite %
Rectrery)
1.05 (95)
1.11 (903),
1.15 (86.6)
-
1.26 (79.7)
1.11 (90)
1.18 (85)
132(76)
1.18 (84.8)
: ' :-'v.
'•''••• •-,:fJ-.
VatbjyUly;'.
•.**to*.'M
1.9
4.47
2.77
2.8
2.8
7.15
2.8
1.29
- < - Indicates a value less'than the detection limit.
•See Table 5-5 for more information on treatment tests.
'Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
NRJ-07.1\(Hi29-01.nrj
5-48
-------
Table 5-3 (Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
Thallium
Zinc
(1)
Treatment
Standard:
Concentration
in TCLP
Extract (mg/L)
0.078
5.3
(2)
Waste Code(s)
K061
K061
(3)
Concentration
to TCLP
Extract of
Treated
Waste (mg/L)
< 0.024
0.602
(4)
Treatment Test*
Fro* Which the
PerfonnaaceData*
Were Transferred
K061-
INMETCO
K06MMS
(5)
Constituent Front WUcb
the Concentration In
Treated Waster Wa«
Transferred
Thallium
Zinc
(ft
Co«rtto*»t From Which
tbe Actiurfety ConreCuQS
Factor Wai Trauferred
Thallium
Zinc
(7)
~ Accttrnfcy
: CorrecwMt
Fador
(Matrtc Spik* *
1.16 (86)
1.02(98)
® ,
'"""'I WMft
- S
^
VL .titMnit
•naGWIjF
factor'
2.8
8.6 s
«— ^_«___
< - Indicates a value less'than the detection limit.
"Sec Table 5-5 for more information on treatment tests.
"•Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
NRJ-073\Oo29-01.nrj 5.49
-------
Table 5-4
Treatment Performance Database for Vanadium (Nonwastewaters)
Constituent Selected
for Regulation
Vanadium
Vanadium
(1)
Potential
Treatment
Standard
(mg/L)
0.20
0.23
(2)
Waste Code
(3)
Concentration
laTCLP
Extract of
Treated
Waste (ntf/l)
(4)
TmhaertTertWFmn
WhfcfctttePerftmaie*
Dau'WereTnwtfand
(5)
C««tk«*Fr<«WWcfctfce
Cweeatrttk* it Treated .-.-.-.
Waste Wa*Tramfem4
W
4'
C
-------
Table 5-5
Treatment Performance Database for Chromium (Nonvvastewaters)
Constituent Selected
for Regulation
(1)
Potential
Treatment
Standard
(mg/L)
(2)
Waste Code
(3)
Concentration
inTCLP
Extract of
Treated
Waste (tagll)
(4)
Treatment Te«t(i) Prom
Which the Perfomaace
Data'WmTrawfernd
(5)
CMstftuent Fran Which (to
Concentration in Treated
Waste Was Transferred
to
CoMtitwart I5wa Which
the Accuracy Correction
Data Were Trass ferrod
(7)
Accuracy
Correction
factor
(Matrix Spike
% Recovery)
Stabilization Performance Data from Cyanokem Corporation
Chromium
0.86
D007
0.16
D007-Cyanokem
Chromium
1 Chromium
1(105)'
CD
X
•1
• •:..•&
•!
Variabil
• Tittot
'••••'" •• '":•:;£
5.4
"This number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
•"Performance consists of concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
Source: Reference 52.
ft-'
NRJ-073
0629-()l.ni)
5-51
-------
Table 5-6
Treatment Tests from Which Treatment Performance Data for
Metal Constituents Were Used
Waste Tested
D004
D005
D007-Cyanokem
D010
F006
F024
K019
K046
K048-K052
K061 - Horsehead
Resource Development
Company (HRD)
K061 - International .
Metals Reclamation
Company (INMETCO)
K061 - International
Mills Service (IMS)
K061 - SKF Plasma
Technologies (SKF)
K061
K062
K071
:T;;;*^-TSM*aoiogy1Jsed/::;'i;:
Slag Vitrification
Stabilization
Stabilization
Stabilization
Stabilization
Stabilization
Incineration
Stabilization
Stabilization
HTMR
HTMR
HTMR
HTMR
Stabilization
Chromium Reduction
Followed by Chemical
Precipitation and
Filtration
Acid Leaching
On-Site Engineering
Report Re&nence(a>
.
• .
.
.
19
8
20
21,22
23
-
.
' -
24
25
26
Background Document
ig«fe; Reference(9)
50
51
52
50
56
75
31
58
59,60
61
61
61
61
.
62
64
NRJ-073
0629-01.nr|
5-52
-------
6.0 DEVELOPMENT OF NONWASTEWATER UNIVERSAL STANDARDS
This section presents the development of nonwastewater treatment
standards for the organic and metal constituents selected for regulation using the
available treatment performance data presented in Section 5.0.
Table 6-1 presents the universal standard, treatability group, and waste
code upon which the universal standard was based for each constituent selected for
regulation. This table also includes a cross-reference guide for locating the constituent-
specific discussions of the determination of universal standards.
&•* Determination of Universal Standards for Organic Constituents
The Agency identified universal standards for organic constituents using the
following methodology:
(1) The Agency selected organic constituents for regulation;
(2) For each organic constituent selected, the Agency listed BDAT
treatment performance data (i.e., data used to develop BDAT
nonwastewater treatment standards in previous rulemakings) by
waste code in Table 5-1; data included the concentration of the
constituent in the treated waste, the accuracy correction factor used
(and its basis), and the variability factor used; and
(3) The Agency evaluated the data on a constituent-by-constituent basis
to determine the data most appropriate to establish a universal
standard.
These steps are described in more detail below.
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj
-------
The development of universal standards for organic constituents began with
the selection of organic constituents selected for regulation from constituents on the
•. f
BDAT List and other hazardous constituents regulated under the Land Disposal
Restrictions Program. Section 3.0 explains the process for the selection of regulated
constituents for universal standards.
This list of constituents was organized into treatability groups that
categorize the organic constituents by similarities in elemental composition and
functional groups. Because of these similarities, constituents within each treatability
group were expected to be treated to similar levels. The organic constituents were
divided into the following-fourteen treatability groups:
Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Carbon Bisulfide
Chlorinated Pesticides
Chlorinated Phenolics and Derivatives
Chlorobenzenes
Halogenated Volatiles
Non-Chlorinated Phenolics
Organo-Bromines
Organo-Nitrogen Compounds
Organo-Sulfur Pesticides
Oxygenated Hydrocarbons
PCBs and Dioxins
Phthalates
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Universal standards were determined utilizing treatment performance data
that had been used to develop nonwastewater treatment standards in the First, Second,
and Third Thirds and Phase I Land Disposal Restrictions rulemakihgs.
To determine a universal standard for a specific constituent, it was
necessary to examine the data used in calculating each promulgated treatment standard
for that constituent. Table 5-1 presents the constituent-specific BDAT treatment
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nij v 6-2
-------
performance data for each waste code to which universal standards are applicable. The
data used to compute the treatment standard include the concentration of the constituent
in the treated waste, an accuracy correction factor, and a variability factor.
When treatment performance data were not available for treatment of a
specific waste code, data were transferred from treatment of a similar waste. Table 5-1
presents the constituent and treatment test from wnich the. concentration in the treated
waste were transferred. The basis for the transfer of an accuracy correction factor is also
included in this table.
The data in Table 5-1 were examined to determine trends within each
treatability group. Notable trends included data transfers from specific constituents,
similar detection levels, similar treatment standards among constituents, and use of
performance data from the same treatment test In general, the various treatment
standards for constituents hi a specific treatability group were comparable in magnitude;
individual standards with values substantially higher than the majority usually signified a
waste that was more difficult to treat or analyze.
Universal standards for organic constituents in nonwastewater forms of
listed wastes were chosen on a constituent-by-constituent basis. Six factors were
considered in selecting a treatment standard value:
(1) Where possible, the Agency preferred to use treatment performance
data (i.e., the matrix spike recovery data, detection limit, and
variability factor shown in Table 5-1) for the constituent of concern.
(2) When treatment performance data for the constituent of concern
were unavailable, the Agency used treatment performance data from
a constituent in the same treatability group.
(3) The Agency evaluated the matrix spike recovery data to determine
whether the recoveries were within the acceptable range of values,
as identified in EPA's Generic Quality Assurance Project Plan for
Land Disposal Restrictions Program (BOAT) (66).
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj
-------
(4) , When evaluating the matrix spike recovery data, the Agency
preferred to use a matrix spike recovery for a specific constituent
instead of a value averaged over a group of constituents (e.g.,
volatile organics).
(5) The Agency examined the method detection limit to determine if it
could be met routinely by industry.
(6) The Agency .compared the treatment standard corresponding to the
"best" data to the detection limits obtained for other waste codes to
determine if the constituent could be treated to similar levels in
similar waste codes.
Table 6-2 summarizes the data used as the basis of the universal standards for regulated
organic constituents in nonwastewater forms of listed hazardous wastes. This table
includes the waste code and treatment performance data from which each organic
nonwastewater universal standard was transferred, and the universal standard.
6.1.1 Determination of Nonwastewater Universal Standards for Aromatic
Hydrocarbons
Nonwastewater treatment performance data for the regulated constituents
in the aromatic hydrocarbons treatability group are presented in Table 5-1. A
constituent-by-constituent discussion of the determination of the universal standards is
given below.
Benzene
The universal standard for benzene was determined to be 10 mg/kg, based
upon the K083 treatment standard data. The Agency chose to use these data because
they represent the use of an accuracy correction factor and detection limit from the same
constituent as the constituent of concern. The universal standard for benzene was not
# *
based upon the F039 and U019 treatment standard data because the detection limit was
considered to be an outlier compared to detection limits from other incineration tests.
NRJ-073 . .
0629-01.nij 6-4
-------
Likewise, the Agency believes that the K060 and K087 standard of 0.071 mg/kg is not
reasonable for a universal standard based on other incineration test detection limits.
The Agency believes that a universal standard of 10 mg/kg can be routinely met by
industry, considering the detection limits reported for benzene in other waste codes.
Ethylbenzene
The universal standard for ethylbenzene was determined to be 10 mg/kg,
based upon the F001-F005, F039, and K086 treatment standards, which represent the
only concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated for this constituent
based on the performance of incineration. The Agency believes that a universal standard
of 10 mg/kg can be routinely met by industry, considering the detection limits reported
for ethylbenzene in other waste codes.
Toluene
i
The universal standard for toluene was determined to be 10 mg/kg, based
upon the K015 treatment standard data. The Agency chose to use these data because
they represent the use of an accuracy correction factor and detection limit from the same
constituent as the constituent of concern. The universal standard for toluene was not
based upon the F001-F005, F039, K001, K037, K086, U051, and U220 treatment
standards because the detection limit was considered to be an outlier compared to
detection limits from other incineration tests. Likewise, the Agency believes that the
K087 standard of 0.65 mg/kg and K022 standard of 0.034 mg/kg are not reasonable for a
universal standard based on other incineration test detection limits. The universal
standard was established at 10 mg/kg so that the treatment standard could be routinely
met by industry, considering the detection limits reported for toluene in other waste
codes.
NRJ-073 v
0629-01.nrj 5.5
-------
Xylenes (Total)
The universal standard for total xylenes was determined to be 30 mg/kg,
based upon the F001-F005, K001, and U051 treatment standard data. The Agency chose
to use these data because they represent the use of an accuracy correction factor and
detection limit from the same constituent as the constituent of concern. The Agency
believes that the K087 standard of 0.070 mg/kg is not reasonable for a universal
standard based on other incineration test detection limits. The universal standard was
established at 30 mg/kg to maintain consistency within the treatability group.
6.1.2 Determination of the Nonwastewater Universal Standard for Carbon
Disulflde
Nonwastewater treatment performance data for carbon disulfide is
presented in Table 5-1. The discussion of the determination of the universal standard is
given below.
Carbon Disulfide
The universal standard for carbon disulfide was determined to be 4.8 mg/L
(as measured by the concentration in the TCLP waste extract) based on the F001-F005
treatment standard, which represents the only concentration-based treatment standard
the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent. Because the treatment of
carbon disulfide, cyclohexanone, and methanol is expected to be controlled by the
regulation of other organic compounds, the universal standard is applicable only if these
constituents are the only regulated hazardous constituents identified in the waste.
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj . 6-6
-------
6.1.3 Determination of Nonwastewater Universal Standards for Chlorinated
Pesticides
Nonwastewater treatment performance data for the regulated constituents
in the chlorinated pesticides treatability group are presented in Table 5-1. A constituent-
by-constituent discussion of the determination of the universal standards is given below.
Aldrin
The universal standard for aldrin was determined to be 0.066 mg/kg, based
upon the F039 and P004 treatment standards, which represent the only concentration-
based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
alpha-BHC
The universal standard for alpha-BHC was determined to be 0.066 mg/kg,
based upon the F039 and U129 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
beta-BHC
The universal standard for beta-BHC was determined to be 0.066 mg/kg,
based upon the F039 and U129 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standard the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
delta-BHC
The universal standard for delta-BHC was determined to be 0.066 mg/kg,
based upon the F039 and U129 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standard the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
NRJ-073 ' -
0629-01.ni] V 5.7
-------
gamma-BBC (Lindane)
The universal standard for gamma-BHC was determined to be 0.066
mg/kg, based upon the F039 and U129 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standard the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
Chlordane
• The universal standard for chlordane was determined to be 0.26 mg/kg,
based upon the K032 and K097 treatment standard data. The Agency chose to use these
data because they represent the use of an accuracy correction factor and detection limit
from the same constituent as the constituent of concern. The two isomers of chlordane,
alpha and gamma, were also considered in calculating the K032 and K097 treatment
standards.
o,p'-DDD
The universal standard for o,p'-DDD was determined to be 6.087 mg/kg,
based upon the F039, U060, and U061 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
p,p'-DDD
The universal standard for p,p'-DDD.was determined to be 0.087 mg/kg,
based upon the F039, U060, and U061 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
NRJ-073
0629-01.ni] 6-8
-------
o,p'-DDE
The universal standard for o,p'-DDE was determined to be 0.087 mg/kg,
based upon the F039 and U061 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
p,p'-DDE
The universal standard for p,p'-DDE was determined to be 0.087 mg/kg,
based upon the F039 and U061 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
o,p'-DDT
The universal standard for o,p'-DDT was determined to be 0.087 mg/kg,
based upon the F039 and U061 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent
p,p'-DDT
The universal standard for p,p'-DDT was determined to be 0.087 mg/kg,
based upon the F039 and U061 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
Dieldrin
The universal standard for dieldrin was determined to be 0.13 mg/kg,
based upon the F039 and P037j treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent,
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nrj 5.9
-------
Endosulfan I
The universal standard for endosulfan I was determined to be 0.066 mg/kg,
based upon the F039 and P050 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
Endosulfan II
The universal standard for endosulfan n was determined to be 0.13 mg/kg,
based upon the F039 and P050 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
Endosulfan Sulfate
The universal standard for endosulfan sulfate was determined to be 0.13 '
mg/kg, based upon the F039 and P050 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
Endrin
The universal standard for endrin was determined to be 0.13 mg/kg, based
upon the F039 and P051 treatment standards, which represent the only concentration-
based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent
Endrin Aldehyde
The universal standard for endrin aldehyde was determined to be 0.13
mg/kg, based upon the F039 and P051 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
NRJ-073 v
0629-Ol.nq 6-10
-------
Heptachlor
The universal standard for heptachlor was determined to be 0.066 mg/kg,
based upon the F039, P059, K032, and K097 treatment standards, which represent the
only concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this
constituent.
Heptachlor Epoxide
The universal standard for heptachlor epoxide was determined to be 0.066
mg/kg, based upon the F039, P059, K032, and K097 treatment standards, which
represent the only concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for
" this constituent.
Hexachlorobutadiene
-The universal standard for hexachlorobutadiene was determined to be 5.6
mg/kg, based upon the K016, K018, K028, and K030 treatment standard data. The
Agency chose to use the K016, K018, K028, and K030 treatment standard data rather
than the F025, F039, and U128 treatment standard data because the detection limit used
in calculating the F025, F039, and U128 standards was considered to be an outlier
compared to detection limits from other incineration tests. The Agency believes that a
universal standard of 5.6 mg/kg may be reasonably achieved based on the detection
limits reported for hexachlorobutadiene in other waste codes.
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
The universal standard for hexachldrocyclopentadiene was determined to
be 2.4 mg/kg, based upon the K032, K033, K034, and K097 treatment standard data.
The Agency chose to use the K032, K033, K034, and K097 treatment standard data since
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj .' 6-11
-------
these data represent the use of an accuracy correction factor and detection limit from
the same constituent as the constituent of concern. The Agency believes that a universal
standard of 2.4 mg/kg may be reasonably achieved based on detection limits reported for
hexachlorocyclopentadiene in other waste codes.
Isodrin
The universal standard for isodrin was determined to be 0.066 mg/kg,
based upon the F039 and P060 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent
, Kepone
The universal standard for kepone was determined to be 0.13 mg/kg, based
upon the F039 and U142 treatment standards, which represent the only concentration-
based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent
Methoxychlor
The universal standard for methoxychlor was determined to be 0.18 mg/kg,
based on the F039 and U247 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
Toxaphene
The universal standard for toxaphene was determined to be 2.6 mg/kg,
based upon the K041 and K098 treatment standard data. The Agency chose to use these
data because they represent the use of an accuracy correction factor and detection limit
from a characteristically similar constituent. The detection limit transferred in these
standards was 10 times that of chlordane to account for the characteristic differences
NRJ-073" ' v
0629-Ol.nq 6-12
-------
between the two compounds. The Agency believes that the transfer of data which
incorporate the characteristic differences between toxaphene and chlordane is
appropriate.
6.1.4 Determination of Nonwastewater Universal Standards for Chlorinated
Phenolics and Derivatives
Nonwastewater treatment performance data for the regulated constituents
in the chlorinated phenolics and derivatives treatability group are presented in Table 5-1.
A constituent-by-constituent discussion of the determination of the universal standards is
given below.
p-Chloro-m-cresol
The universal standard for p-chloro-m-cresol was determined to be 14
mgAg, based upon the F039 and U039 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards promulgated to date for this constituent.
2-ChlorophenoI
The universal standard for 2-chlprophenol was determined to be 5.7 mg/kg,
based upon the F039 and U048 treatment standard data. The Agency chose to use these
data because they represent the use of an accuracy correction factor and detection limit
from the same constituent as the constituent of concern. The Agency believes that a
universal standard of 5.7 mg/kg may be reasonably achieved based on detection limits
reported for 2-chlorophenol in other waste codes.
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nrj 6-13
-------
2,4-Dichlorophenol
The universal standard for 2,4-dichlorophenol was determined to be 14
mg/kg, based upon the F039 and U081 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards promulgated to date for this constituent
r\ l'
2,6-Dichlorophenol
The universal standard for 2,6-dichlorophenol was determined to be 14
mg/kg, based upon the F039 and U082 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards promulgated to date for this constituent.
f
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D)
The universal standard for 2,4-D was determined to be 10 mg/kg, based
upon the F039 and U240 treatment standards, which represent the only concentration-
based standards promulgated to date for this constituent
Pentachlorophenol
. The universal standard for pentachlorophenol was determined to be 7.4
mg/kg, based upon the F039, K001, and U051 treatment standards, which represent the
only concentration-based standards promulgated to date for this constituent
Silvex (2,4,5-TP)
The universal standard for 2,4,5-TP was determined to be 7.9 mg/kg, based
upon the F039 treatment standard, which represents the only concentration-based
standard promulgated to date for this constituent
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nij 6-14
-------
2,4,5-T
The universal standard for 2,4,5-T was determined to be 7.9 mg/kg, based
upon the F039 treatment standard, which represents the only concentration-based
standard promulgated to date for this constituent
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
The universal standard for 2,3,4,6-tetrachlorophenol was determined to be
7.4 mg/kg, based upon the F039 treatment standard, which represents the only
concentration-based standard promulgated to date for this constituent.
The treatment standard for F039 was calculated incorrectly from the
practical quantification limit, which is five times higher than the detection limit (this
discrepancy is explained in Table 5-1). The treatment performance data transferred for
the universal standard are correct
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
The universal standard for 2,4,5-trichlorophenol was determined to be 7.4
mg/kg, based upon the F039 treatment standard data. The Agency chose not to use the
K105 data because EPA believes that the K105 standard of 4.4 mg/kg is not reasonable
for a universal standard based on other incineration test detection limits.
The treatment standard for F039 was calculated incorrectly from the
practical quantification limit, which is five times higher than the detection limit (this
discrepancy is explained in Table 5-1). The treatment performance data transferred for
the universal standard are correct.
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj
-------
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
The universal standard for 2,4,6-trichlorophenol was determined to be 7.4
mg/kg, based upon the F039 treatment standard data. The Agency chose not to use the
K105 data because EPA believes that the K105 standard of 4.4 mg/kg is not reasonable
for a universal standard based on other incineration test detection limits.
The treatment standard for F039 was calculated incorrectly from the
practical quantification limit, which is five times higher than the detection limit (this
discrepancy is explained in Table 5-1). The treatment performance data transferred for
the universal standard are correct.
Determination of Nonwastewater Universal. Standards for Chlorobenzenes
Nonwastewater treatment performance data for the regulated constituents
in the chlorobenzene treatability group are presented in Table 5-1. A constituent-by-
constituent discussion of the determination of the universal standards is given below.
Chlorobenzene
The universal standard for chlorobenzene was determined to be 6.0 mg/kg
based upon the K019, F039, U037, and F001-F005 treatment standard data. The Agency
chose to use these data because they represent the use of an accuracy correction factor
and detection limit from the same constituent as the constituent of concern. The
universal standard was established at 6.0 mg/kg to maintain consistency within the
treatability group. The Agency believes that a universal standard of 6.0 mg/kg may be
reasonably achieved based on the detection limits reported for chlorobenzene in other
waste codes. . .
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nij v 6-16
-------
m-Dichlorobenzene
The universal standard for m-dichlorobenzene was determined to be 6.0
mg/kg, based upon the F039 and U071 treatment standard data. The .Agency chose to
use these data because they represent the use of a detection limit from the same.
constituent as the constituent of concern and the accuracy correction factor from p-
dichlorobenzene, a constituent with similar composition and structure. The universal
standard was established at 6.0 mg/kg to maintain consistency within the treatability
group. The Agency believes that a universal standard of 6.0 mg/kg may be reasonably
achieved based on the detection limits reported for m-dichlorobenzene in other waste
codes.
o-Dichlorobenzene
The universal standard for o-dichlorobenzene was determined to be 6.0
mg/kg, based upon the F001-F005, F039, U070, and K086 treatment standard data. The
Agency chose to use these data because they represent the use of a detection limit from
the same constituent as the constituent of concern and the accuracy correction factor
from p-dichlorobenzene, a constituent with similar composition and structure. The
universal standard was established at 6.0 mg/kg to maintain consistency within the
treatability group. The Agency believes that a universal standard of 6.0 mg/kg may be
reasonably achieved based on the detection limits reported for o-dichlorobenzene in
other waste codes.
p-Dichlorobenzene
The universal standard for p-dichlorobenzene was determined to be 6.0
mg/kg, based upon the F039 and U072 treatment standard data. The Agency chose to
use these data because they represent the use of an accuracy correction factor and
detection limit from the same constituent as the constituent of concern. The universal
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj 6-17 .
-------
standard was established at 6.0 mg/kg to maintain consistency within the treatability
v
group. The Agency believes that a universal standard of 6.0 mg/kg may be reasonably
achieved based on the detection limits reported for p-dichlorobenzene in other waste
codes. .
Hexachlorobenzene
The universal standard for hexachlorobenzene was determined to be 10
mg/kg, based upon the K085 treatment standard data. The Agency chose to use these
data because they Tepresent the use of an accuracy correction factor and detection limit
from the same constituent as the constituent of concern. The universal standard for
hexachlorobenzene was not based upon the K016, K018, F025, F039, and U127 treatment
standard data because the detection limit was considered.to be an outlier compared to
detection limits from other incineration tests. The universal standard was established at
10 mg/kg in order that the treatment standard could be routinely met by industry,
considering the detection limits reported for hexachlorobenzene in other waste codes.
Pentachlorobenzene
The universal standard for pentachlorobenzene was determined to be 10
mg/kg, based upon the K042 and K085 treatment standard data. The universal standard
for pentachlorobenzene was not based upon the K030, F039, and U183 treatment
standard data because the detection limit was considered to be an outlier compared to
detection limits from other incineration tests. The universal standard was established at
10 mg/kg in order that the treatment standard could be routinely met by industry,
considering the detection limits reported for pentachlorobenzene in other waste codes.
Further, the Agency chose to use the K042 and K085 treatment standard data because
these data represent the use of an actual matrix spike recovery as opposed to an
averaged value.
NRJ-073 v
0629-Ol.nrj 6-18
-------
Pentachloronitrobenzene
The universal standard for pentachloronitrobenzene was determined to be
4.8 mg/kg, based upon the F039 and U185 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
The universal standard for 1,2,4,5-tetrachlorobenzene was determined to be
14 mg/kg, based upon the K030 treatment standard data. The Agency chose to use
these data because they represent the use of an accuracy correction factor and detection
limit from the same constituent as the constituent of concern.
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
The universal standard for 1^,4-trichlorobenzene was determined to be 19
mg/kg based upon the K019, F039, K030, K096 treatment standard data. The Agency
chose to use these data because they represent the use of an accuracy correction factor
and detection limit from the same constituent as the constituent of concern.
6.1.6 Determination of Nonwastewater Universal Standards for Halogenated
Volatiles
Nonwastewater treatment performance data for the regulated constituents
in the halogenated volatiles treatability group are presented in Table 5-1. A constituent-
by-constituent discussion of the determination of the universal standards is given below.
NRJ-073
0629-01.mj 6-19
-------
Benzal Chloride
The universal standard for benzal chloride was determined to be 6.0 •
mg/kg, based upon the K015 treatment standard, which represents the only
concentration-based standard the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
The universal standard was established at 6.0 mg/kg to maintain consistency within the
treatability group.
Carbon Tetrachloride
The universal standard for carbon tetrachloride was determined to be 6.0
mg/kg, based on the K021 and K073 treatment standard data. The Agency chose to use
these data because they represent the use of an accuracy correction factor and detection
limit from the same constituent as the constituent of concern. The universal standard
was established at 6.0 mg/kg to maintain consistency within the treatability group. The
Agency believes that a universal standard of 6.0 mg/kg may be reasonably achieved
based on the detection limits reported for carbon.tetrachloride in other waste codes.
2-Chloro-l,3-butadiene
The universal standard for 2-chloro-l,3-butadiene was determined to be
t
0.28 mg/kg, based upon the F024 treatment standard, which represents the only
concentration-based standard the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
Chloroethane
The universal standard for chloroethane was determined to be 6.0 mg/kg,
based upon the F039 and K018 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent. •
NRJ-073 v
0629-Ol.nrj 6-20
-------
bis(2-Chloroethoxy) Methane
The universal standard for bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane was determined to
be 7.2 mg/kg, based upon the F039 and U024 treatment standards, which represent the
only concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this
constituent
bis(2-ChIoroethy!) Ether
The universal standard for bis(2-chloroethyl) ether was determined to be
6.0 mg/kg, based upon the K019 treatment standard data. The Agency chose to use
these data because they represent the use of an accuracy correction factor and detection
limit from the same constituent as the constituent of concern. The universal standard
was established at 6.0 mg/kg to maintain consistency within the treatability group. The
Agency believes that a universal standard of 6.0 mg/kg may be reasonably achieved
based on the detection limits reported for bis(2-chloroethyl) ether in other waste codes.
Chloroform
The universal standard for chloroform was determined to be 6.0 mg/kg,
based upon the K019, K009, K010, K029, F025, K021, and K073 treatment standard data.
The Agency chose to use these data because they represent the use of an accuracy
correction factor and detection limit from the same constituent as the constituent of
concern. The Agency believes that a universal standard of 6.0 rng/kg may be reasonably
achieved based on the detection limits reported for chloroform in other waste codes.
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) Ether
*
The universal standard for bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether was determined to
be 7.2 mg/kg, based upon the F039 and U027 treatment standards, which represent the
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nij . 6-21
-------
only concentration-based standard the Agency has promulgated to date for this
constituent . •
Chloromethane
The universal standard for chloromethane was determined to be 30 mg/kg,
based upon the F039 and U045 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
The universal standard was established at 30 mg/kg to maintain consistency within the
treatability group.
3-Chloropropene
The universal standard for 3-chloropropene was determined to be 30
mg/kg, based upon the F039 treatment standard, which represents the only
concentration-based standard the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent
The universal standard was established at 30 mg/kg to maintain consistency within the
treatability group.
Dichlorodifluoromethane
The universal standard for dichlorodifluoromethane was determined to be
7.2 mg/kg, based upon the F039 and U075 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standard the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
1,1-Dichloroethane , ,
*
The universal standard for 1,1-dichloroethane was determined to be 6.0.
mg/kg, based on the K018 and K028 treatment standard data. The Agency chose to use
these data because they represent the use of an accuracy correction factor and detection
NRJ-073 • ' ' ,
0629-01.nij 6-22
-------
limit from the same constituent as the constituent of concern.. The Agency believes that
a universal standard of 6.0 mg/kg may be reasonably achieved based on the detection
limits reported for 1,1-dichloroethane in other waste codes.
1,2-Dichloroethane
The universal standard for 1,2-dichloroethane was determined to be 6.0
mg/kg, based upon the K018, K019, K020, K029, and F025 treatment standard data.
The Agency chose to use these data because they represent the use of an accuracy
correction factor and detection limit from the same constituent as the constituent of
concern. The Agency believes that a universal standard of 6.0 mg/kg may be reasonably
achieved based on the detection limits reported for 1,2-dichloroethane in other waste
codes. • . • v
1,1-Dichloroethylene
The universal standard for 1,1-dichloroethylene was determined to be 6.0
mg/kg, based on the K029 and F025 treatment standard data. The Agency chose to use
»
these data rather than the F039 and U078 treatment standard data because the detection
limit used in calculating the F039 and UOJ8 treatment standards were considered to be
an outlier compared to the magnitude of the detection limits from other incineration
tests. The Agency believes that a universal standard of 6.0 mg/kg may be reasonably
achieved based on the detection limits reported for 1,1-dichloroethylene in other waste
codes. .
The F025 treatment standard was calculated from the incorrect accuracy
correction factor, 1.10, which should have been 1.06, yielding a treatment standard of 6.0
mg/kg (this discrepancy is explained in Table 5-1). The treatment performance data
transferred for the universal standard are correct.
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nrj 6_23
-------
. trans-l,2-Dichloroethylene
The universal standard for trans-1,2-dichloroethylene was determined to be
30 mg/kg, based upon the F039 and U079 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standard the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
The universal standard was established at 30 mg/kg to maintain consistency within the
treatability group.
1,2-Dichloropropane
The universal standard for 1,2-dichloropropane was determined to be 18
mg/kg, based upon the F039, U083, and K017 treatment standards, which represent the
only concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this
constituent. .
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
The universal standard for cis-l,3-dichloropropene was determined to be 18
mg/kg, based upon the F039 and U084 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
trans-13-DichIoropropene
The universal standard for trans-1,3-dichloropropene was determined to be
18 mg/kg, based upon the F039 and U084 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
NRJ-073 ^
0629-Ol.nrj . O-24
-------
Hexachloroethane
The universal standard for hexachloroethane was determined to be 30
mg/kg, based upon the F025, F039, K016, K018, K019, K028, K030, K073, K095, and
U131 treatment standards, which represent the only concentration-based standards the
Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent The universal standard was
established at 30 mg/kg to maintain consistency within the treatability group.
Hexachloropropene
The universal standard for hexachloropropene was determined to be 30
mg/kg, based upon the F039 and U243 treatment standard data. The Agency chose to
use these data because they represent the use of a detection limit from the same
constituent as the constituent of concern and an accuracy correction factor from a
constituent in the same treatability group. The universal standard was established at 30
mg/kg to maintain consistency within the treatability group.
lodomethane
The universal standard for iodomethane was determined to be 65 mg/kg,
based upon the F039 and U138 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
Methylene Chloride
The universal standard for methylene chloride was determined to be 30
mg/kg, based upon the F001-F005, F039, U080, and K086 treatment standard data. The
Agency chose to use these data because they represent the use of actual matrix spike
data as opposed to an averaged value. The universal standard was established at 30
mg/kg to maintain consistency within the treatability group. . • •
V -
NRJ-073 • .
0629-Ol.nrj ' 6-25
-------
4,4-Methylene-bis-2-chloroaniline
The universal standard for 4,4-methylene-bis-2-chloroaniline was
determined to be 30 mg/kg, based upon the F039 and U158 treatment standards, which
represent the only concentration-based standard the Agency has promulgated to date for
this constituent The universal standard was established at 30 mg/kg to maintain
consistency within the treatability group.
Pentachloroethane
jt.
The universal standard for pentachloroethane was determined to be 6.0
mg/kg, based upon the K018, K028, K030, K095, and K096 treatment standards, which
represent the only concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for
this constituent The universal standard was established at 6.0 mg/kg to maintain
consistency within the treatability group.
i
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane
The universal standard for l,l,i,2-tetrachloroethane was determined to be
6.0 mg/kg, based upon the K028, K095, and K096 treatment standard data. The Agency
chose to use these data rather than transferring other treatment standard data. The
universal standard for 1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane was not based upon the F039 and U208
treatment standard data because the detection limit was considered to be an outlier
compared to the detection limits from other incineration tests. The universal standard
was established at 6.0 mg/kg to maintain consistency within the treatability group. The
Agency believes that the universal standard of 6.0 mg/kg may be reasonably achieved
based on the detection limits reported for 1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane in other waste codes.
NRJ-073
0629-01.nq 6-26
-------
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
The universal standard for 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane was determined to be
6.0 mg/kg, based upon the K020, K028, K095, and K096 treatment standard data. The
Agency chose to use these data rather than transferring other treatment standard data.
The universal standard for 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane was not based upon the F039 and
U209 treatment standard data because the detection limit was considered to be an
outlier compared to the detection limits from other incineration tests. The universal
standard was established at 6.0 mg/kg to maintain consistency within the treatability
group. The Agency believes that the universal standard of 6.0 mg/kg may be reasonably
achieved based on the detection limits reported for 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane in other
waste codes.
Tetrachloroethyiene
The universal standard for tetrachloroethylene was determined to be 6.0
mg/kg, based on the K019, K016, K020, K028, K030, K073, K095, K096 treatment
standard data. The Agency chose to use these data because they represent the use of an
accuracy correction factor and detection limit from the same constituent as the
constituent of concern. The Agency believes that a universal standard of 6.0 mg/kg may
be reasonably achieved based on the detection limits reported for tetrachlproethylene in
other waste codes.
: 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
The universal standard for 1,1,1-trichloroethane was determined to be 6.0
mg/kg, based upon the K019, K018, K028, K029, K073 treatment standard data. The
Agency chose to use these data because they represent the use of an accuracy correction
factor and detection limit from the same constituent as the constituent of concern. The
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj ' 6-27
-------
Agency believes that a universal standard of 6.0 mg/kg may be reasonably achieved
based on the detection limits reported for 1,1,1-trichloroethane in other waste codes.
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
The universal standard for 1,1,2-trichloroethane was determined to be 6.0
mg/kg, based upon the F025 treatment standard data. The Agency chose to use these
data because they represent the use of an accuracy correction factor and detection limit
from the same constituent as the constituent of concern. The Agency believes that a
universal standard of 6.0 mg/kg may be reasonably achieved based on the detection
limits reported for 1,1,2-trichloroethane in other waste codes.
The F025 treatment standard was calculated from the incorrect accuracy
correction factor (this discrepancy is explained in Table 5-1). The treatment
performance data transferred for the universal standard are correct
Trichloroethylene
The universal standard for trichloroethylene was determined to be 6.0
mg/kg, based upon the F001-F005, F025, F039, K086, U228, K095, and K096 treatment
standards, which represent the only concentration-based standards the Agency has
promulgated to date for this constituent. The universal standard was established at 6.0
mg/kg to maintain consistency within the treatability group.
Trichloromonofluoromethane
The universal standard for trichloromonofluoromethane was determined to
be 30 mg/kg, based upon the F001-F005, F039, and U121 treatment standards, which
represent the only concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for
this constituent.
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nrj v 6-28
-------
1,2,3-TrichIoropropane
The universal standard for 1,2,3-trichloropropane was determined to be 30
mg/kg, based upon the F039 and K017 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
The universal standard was established at 30 mg/kg to maintain consistency within the
treatability group.
M^-TricUoro-l^Z-trifluoroethane
. The universal standard for l,l,2-trichloro-l,2,2^trifluoroethane was
determined to be 30 mg/kg, based on the F001-F005 and F039 treatment standards,
which represent the only concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to
date for this constituent. The universal standard was established at 30 mg/kg to
maintain consistency within the treatability group.
Vinyl Chloride
The universal standard for vinyl chloride was determined to be 6.0 mg/kg,
based on the K029 treatment standard data. The Agency chose to use the K029
treatment standard data rather than transferring other treatment standard data. The
universal standard for vinyl chloride wa§ not based upon the F025, F039, and UQ43
treatment standard data because the detection limit was considered to be an outlier
compared to the magnitude of the detection limits from other incineration tests. The
universal standard was established at 6.0 mg/kg to maintain consistency within the
treatability group. The Agency believes that a universal standard of 6.0 mg/kg may be
reasonably achieved based on the detection limits reported for vinyl chloride in other
waste codes.
NRJ-073 ^
0629-01.nrj 6-29
-------
6.1.7 Determination of Nonwastewater Universal Standards for Nonchlorinated
Phenolics
Nonwastewater treatment performance data for the regulated constituents in
the nonchlorinated phenolics treatability group are presented in Table 5-1. A constituent-
by-constituent discussion of the determination of the universal standards is given below.
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitr6phenol (Dinoseb)
The universal standard for dinoseb was determined to be 2.5 mg/kg, based
upon the F039 and P020 treatment standards, which represent the only concentration-
based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent
Cresol (m- and p- isomers)
The universal standard for m- and p-cresol was determined to be 5.6 mg/kg
based upon the F001-F005, F039, and U052 treatment standard data. The Agency chose
to use the F001-F005, F039, and U052 data since these data represent the only
concentration-based treatment standards promulgated to date for this constituent based
upon the performance of incineration. The Agency believes that the detection limit
reported for m- and p-cresol in the K019 treatment test of 2.0 mg/kg is representative of
the detection limits that may be reasonably achieved for m- and p-cresol. In addition, a
universal standard of 5.6 mg/kg is consistent with the universal standard established for a
constmtent similar in elementeal composition and functional groups, o-cresol.
o-Cresol
The universal standard for o-cresol was determined to be 5.6 mg/kg, based
upon the F001-F005, F039, and U052 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards promulgated to date for this constituent. .
NRJ-073 v
0629-Ol.nij 6-30
-------
2,4-Diraethylphenol
The universal standard for 2,4-dimethylphenol was determined to be 14
mg/kg, based upon the F039 and U101 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards promulgated to date for this constituent
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresoI
The universal standard for 4,6-dinitro-o-cresol was determined to be 160
mg/kg, based upon the F039 and P047 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards promulgated to date for this constituent
2,4-Dinitrophenol
The universal standard for 2,4-dinitrophenol was determined to be 160
mg/kg, based upon the F039 and P048 treatment standard data. The Agency chose to
use these data because they represent the use of a detection limit from the same
constituent as the constituent of concern and an accuracy correction factor from a
constituent in the same treatability group.
(o) 2-Nitrophenol
The universal standard for (o) 2-nitrophenol was determined to be 13
rng/kg, based upon the K102 treatment standard, which represents the only
concentration-based standard the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj
-------
(p) 4-Nitrophenol
The universal standard for (p) 4-nitrophenol was determined to be 29
mg/kg, based upon the F039 and U170 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
Phenol
The ^universal standard for phenol was determined to be 6.2 mg/kg, based
upon the F039, K083, and U188 treatment standard data. The Agency chose to use
these data because they represent the transfer of an accuracy correction factor and
detection limit from the same constituent as the constituent of concern and the use of an
actual matrix spike recovery. The Agency did not use the K022 treatment standard data
because the treatment standard was considered to be an outlier compared to the
magnitude of the detection limits from other incineration tests. The Agency believes
that a universal standard of 6.2 mg/kg may be reasonably achieved based on detection
limits reported for phenol in other waste codes.
The K083 treatment standard was calculated from the incorrect accuracy
correction factor (this discrepancy is explained in Table 5-1). The treatment
performance, data transferred for the universal standard are correct.
*
6.1.8 Determination of Nonwastewater Universal Standards for Organo-
Bromines - .
Nonwastewater treatment performance data for the regulated constituents
in the organo-bromines treatability group are presented in Table 5-1. A constituent-by-
constituent discussion of the determination of the universal standards is given below.
0629-Ol.nrj
-------
Bromodichloromethane
The universal standard for bromodichloromethane was determined to be 15
mg/kg, based upon the F039 treatment standard, which represents the only
concentration-based standard the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
Bromoform (Tribromomef bane)
The universal standard for bromoform was determined to be 15 mg/kg,
based upon the F039 and U225 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
Bromomethane
The universal standard for bromomethane was determined to be 15 mg/kg,
based upon the F039, K117, K118, K131, K132, K136, and U029 treatment standards,
which represent the only concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to
date for this constituent; .
4-BromophenyI phenyl ether
The universal standard for 4-bromophenyl phenyl ether was determined to
be 15 mg/kg, based upon the F039 and U030 treatment standards, which represent the
only concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this
constituent. •
NRJ-073
0629-01.nij ^ 5.33
-------
Chlorodibromomethane
The universal standard for Chlorodibromomethane was determined to be 15
mg/kg, based upon the F039 treatment standard, which represents the only
concentration-based standard the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
l^-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
The universal standard for l,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane was detennined to
be 15 mg/kg, based upon the F039 and U066 treatment standards, which represent the
only concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this
constituent. . .
Dibromomethane
The universal standard for dibromomethane was determined to be 15
mg/kg, based upon the F039 and U068 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
tris-(2,3-Dibromopropyl) phosphate
The universal standard for tris-(2,3-dibromopropyl) phosphate was
detennined to be 0.10 mg/kg, based upon the U235 treatment standard, which represents
the only concentration-based standard the Agency has promulgated to date for this
constituent.
Ethylene Dibromide (1,2-Dibromoethane)
The universal standard for ethylene dibromide was determined to be 15
mg/kg, based upon the F039, K117, K118, K136, and U067 treatment standards, which
NRJ.073
0629-01.ni]
-------
represent the only concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for
this constituent.
6.1.9 Determination of Nonwastewater Universal Standards for Organo-Nitrogen
Compounds
Nonwastewater treatment performance data for the regulated constituents
in the organo-nitrogen compounds treatability group are presented in Table 5-1. A
constituent-by-constituent discussion of the determination of the universal standards is
given below. -
Acetonitrile
The universal standard for acetonitrile was determined to be 1.8 mg/kg,
based upon the K011, K013, and K014 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent
2-Acetylaminofluorene
The universal standard for 2-acerylaminofluorene was determined to be 140
mg/kg, based upon the F039 and U005 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
Acrylamide
The universal standard for acrylamide was determined to be 23 mg/kg,
based upon the KOI1, K013,.and K014 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj . x 5.35
-------
Acrylonitrile
The universal standard for acrylonitrile was determined to be 84 mg/kg,
based upon the F039 and U009 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
Aniline
The universal standard for aniline was determined to be 14 mg/kg, based
upon the F039, U012, and K083 treatment standard data. The Agency chose to use
these data because they represent the use of a detection limit from the same constituent
as the constituent of concern and an accuracy correction factor from a similar
constituent A universal standard of 14 mg/kg was chosen to account for regulatory
flexibility based on variations in treatment of this constituent
p-Chloroaniline
The universal standard for p-chloroaniline was determined to be 16 mg/kg,
based upon the F039 and P024 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
1,4-Dinitrobenzene
The universal standard for 1,4-dinitrobenzene was determined to be 2.3
mg/kg, based upon the F039 treatment standard, which represents the only
concentration-based standard the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nrj 6-36
-------
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
The universal standard for 2,4-dinitrotoluene was determined to be 140
mg/kg, based upon the F039, Kill, and U105 treatment standards, which represent the
only concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this
constituent.
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
The universal standard for 2,6-dinitrotoluene was determined to be 28
mg/kg, based upon the F039, Kill, and U106 treatment standards, which represent the
only concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this
constituent.
Di-n-propylnitrosamine
The universal standard for di-n-propylnitrosamine was determined to be 14
mg/kg, based upon the F039 and Ulll treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
Diphenylamine/Diphenylnitrosamine
The universal standard for the sum of diphenylamine and
diphenylnitrosamine was determined to be 13 mg/kg, based upon the K022 treatment
standard data. The Agency chose to use these data because they represent the use of an
accuracy correction factor and detection limit from the same constituents as the
constituents of concern. As explained in Section 3.2.1, these constituents are regulated
as a sum in universal standards to account for analytical difficulties in distinguishing the .
two compounds. ' .
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj 6-37
-------
Methacrylonitrile /
The universal standard for methacrylonitrile was determined to be 84
rug/kg, based upon the F039 and U152 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
Methapyriline
The universal standard for methapyriline was determined to be 1.5 mg/kg,
based upon the F039 and U155 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
(o) 2-Nitroaniline .
The universal standard for (o) 2-nitroaniline was determined to be 14
mg/kg, based upon the K101 treatment standard, which represents the only
concentration-based standard the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
(p) 4-Nitroaniline
The universal standard for (p) 4-nitroanilihe was determined to be 28
mg/kg, based upon the F039 and P077 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
Nitrobenzene
The universal standard for nitrobenzene was determined to be 14 mg/kg,
based upon the F001-F005, F039, U169, K086, and K083 treatment standard data. The
Agency chose to use these data because they represent the use of an accuracy correction
factor and detection limit from the same or similar constituent.
NRJ.073
0629-Ol.nij ' v 6-38
-------
The universal standard for 5-nitro-o-toluidine was determined to be 28
mg/kg, based upon the F039 and U181 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
N-Nitrosodi-n-butylamiae
The universal standard for N-nitrosodi-n-butylamine was determined to be
17 mg/kg, based upon the F039 and U172 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent
N-Nitrosodiethylamine
• •
The universal standard for N-nitrosodiethylamine was determined to be 28
mg/kg, based upon the F039 and U174 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
N-Nitrosomethylethylamine
The universal standard for N-nitrosomethylethylamine was determined to
be 2.3 mg/kg, based upon the F039 treatment standard, which represents the only
concentration-based standard the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
N-Nitrosomorpholine
The universal standard for N-nitrosomorpholine was determined to be 2.3
mg/kg, based upon the F039 treatment standard, which represents the only
concentration-based standard the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj 5.39
-------
N-Nitrosopiperidine
The universal standard for N-nitrosopiperidine was determined to be 35
mg/kg, based upon the F039 and U179 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
N-Nitrosopyrrolidine
The universal standard for N-nitrosopyrrolidine was determined to be 35
mg/kg, based upon the F039 and U180 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
Phenacetin
The universal standard for phenacetin was determined to be 16 mg/kg,
based upon the F039 and U187 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
Pronamide
The universal standard for pronamide was determined to be 1.5 mg/kg,
based upon the F039 and U192 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent. •
Propanenitrile (Ethyl Cyanide)
The universal standard for propanenitrile was determined to be 360 mg/kg,
based upon the F039 and P101 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
NRJ-073 ^
0629-01.nrj 6-40
-------
Pyridine
The universal standard for pyridine was determined to be 16 mg/kg, based
upon the F001-F005, F039, and U196 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
6.1.10 Determination of Nonwastewater Universal Standards for Organo-Sulfur
Pesticides
Nonwastewater treatment performance data for the regulated constituents
in the organo-sulfur pesticides treatability group are presented in Table 5-1. A
constituent-by-constituent discussion of the development of the universal standards is
given below.
Disulfoton
The universal standard for disulfoton was determined to be 6.2 mg/kg,
based upon the F039 treatment standard data. The Agency chose to use these data
rather than transferring other treatment standard data because the Agency believes the
detection limit from the F039 treatment standard is representative of detection limits for
this treatability group. The universal standard of 6.2 mg/kg was chosen to account for
regulatory flexibility based on variations in treatment of this constituent.
Famphur .
The universal standard for famphur was determined to be 15 mg/kg, based
upon the F039 treatment standard data. The Agency chose to use these data rather than
transferring other treatment standard data because the Agency believes the detection
limit from the F039 treatment standard is representative of detection limits for this
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj
-------
treatability group. The universal standard of 15 mg/kg was chosen to account for
regulatory flexibility based on variations in treatment of this constituent.
Methyl Parathion
The universal standard for methyl parathion was determined to be 4.6
mg/kg, based upon the F039 treatment standard data. The Agency chose to use these
data rather than transferring other treatment standard data because the Agency believes
the detection limit from the F039 treatment standard is representative of detection limits
for this treatability group.. The universal standard of 4.6 mg/kg was chosen to account
for regulatory flexibility based on variations in treatment of this constituent.
Parathion
The universal standard for parathion was determined to be 4.6 mg/kg,
based upon the F039 treatment standard data. The Agency chose to use these data
rather than transferring other treatment standard data because the Agency believes the
detection limit from F039 treatment standard is representative of detection limits for this
treatability group. The universal standard of 4.6 mg/kg was chosen to account for
regulatory flexibility based on variations in treatment of this constituent.
Phorate .
The universal standard for phorate was determined to be 4.6 mg/kg, based
upon the F039 treatment standard data. The Agency chose to use these data rather than
transferring other treatment standard data because the Agency believes the detection
limit from the F039 treatment standard is representative of detection limits for this
treatability group. The universal standard of 4.6 mg/kg was chosen to account for
regulatory flexibility based on variations in treatment of this constituent.
NRJ-073
0639-Ol.nrj . 6-42
-------
6.1.11 Determination of Nonwastewater Universal Standards for Oxygenated
Hydrocarbons
Nonwastewater treatment performance data for the regulated constituents
in the oxygenated hydrocarbons treatability group are presented in Table 5-1. A
constituent-by-constituent discussion of the determination of the universal standards is
given below.
Acetone
The universal standard for acetone was determined to be 160 mg/kg, based
upon the F001-F005, F039, K086, and U002 treatment standards, which represent the
only concentration-based standards promulgated to date for this constituent.
Acetophenone
The universal standard for acetophenone was determined to be 9.7 mg/kg,
based upon the F039, K086, and U004 treatment standard data. The universal standard
for acetophenone was not based upon the K022 treatment standard data because the
detection limit was considered to be an outlier considering detection limits reported for
acetophenone in other incineration tests.
n-ButanoI (n-Bufyl Alcohol)
The universal standard for n-butanol was determined to be 2.6 mg/kg,
based upon the F001-F005, F039, K086, and U031 treatment standards, which represent
the only concentration-based standards promulgated to date for this constituent.
NRJ-073 v
0629-Ol.nrj 6-43
-------
2-Cnlortraaphthalene
The universal standard for 2-chloronaphthalene was determined to be 5.6
mg/kg, based upon the F039 and U047 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards promulgated to date for this constituent.
, Cyclohexanone
The universal standard for cyclohexanone was determined to be 0.75 mg/L
(as measured by the concentration in the TCLP waste extract), based on the F001-F005
treatment standard, which represents the only concentration-based standard the Agency
has promulgated to date for this constituent Because the treatment of carbon disulfide,
cyclohexanone, and methanol is expected to be ensured by the regulation of other
organic compounds, the universal standard is applicable only if these constituents are the
only regulated hazardous constituents identified in the waste.
1,4-Dioxane
The universal standard for 1,4-dioxane was determined to be 170 mg/kg,
based upon the F039 and U108 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards promulgated to date for this constituent.
Ethyl Acetate
The universal standard for ethyl acetate was determined to be 33 mg/kg,
based upon the F001-F005, F039, K086, and U112 treatment standards, which represent
the only concentration-based standards promulgated to date for this constituent.
NRJ-073 >-
0629-Ol.nrj 6-44
-------
Ethyl Ether
The universal standard for ethyl ether was determined to be 160 mg/kg,
based upon the F001-F005, F039, and U117 treatment standards, which represent the
only concentration-based standards promulgated to date for this constituent.
Ethyl Methacrylate
The universal standard for ethyl methacrylate was determined to be 160
mg/kg, based upon the F039 and U118 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards promulgated to date for this constituent.
Isobutanol • .
The universal standard for isobutanol was determined to be 170 mg/kg,
based upon the F001-F005, F039, and U140 treatment standards, which represent the
only concentration-based standards promulgated to date for this constituent.
Isosafrole
The universal standard for isosafrole was determined to be 2.6 mg/kg,
based upon the F039 and U141 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards promulgated to date for this constituent.
Methanol
The universal standard for methanol was determined to be 0.75 mg/L (as
measured by the concentration in the TCLP waste extract), based on the F001-F005
treatment standard, which represents the only concentration-based standard the Agency
has promulgated to date for this constituent. Because the treatment of. carbon disulfide,
NRJ-073 v
0629-Ol.nij 6-45
-------
cyclohexanone, and methanol is expected to be ensured by the regulation of other
organic compounds, the universal standard is applicable only if these constituents are the
only regulated hazardous constituents identified in the waste.
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
The universal standard for methyl ethyl ketone was determined to be 36
mg/kg, based upon the F001-F005, F039, K086, and U159 treatment standards, which
represent the only concentration-based standards promulgated to date for this
constituent
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone
The universal standard for methyl isobutyl ketone was determined to be 33
mg/kg, based upon the F001-F005, F039, K086, and U161 treatment standards, which
represent the only concentration-based standards promulgated to date for this
constituent.
Methyl Methacrylate
The universal standard for methyl methacrylate was determined to be 160
mg/kg, based upon the F039 and U162 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards promulgated to date for this constituent.
Safrole
The universal standard for safrole was determined to be 22 mg/kg, based
upon the F039 and U203 treatment standards, .which represent the only concentration-
based standards promulgated to date for this constituent.
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nq 6-46
-------
6.1:12 Determination of Nonwastewater Universal Standards for PCBs and
Dioxins
Nonwastewater treatment performance data for the regulated constituents
in the PCBs and dioxins treatability group are presented in Table 5-1. A constituent-by-
constituent discussion of the determination of the universal standards is given below.
Total PCBs
The universal standard for total PCBs was determined to be 10 mg/kg,
based upon the sum of the F039 and K085 treatment standards for individual Aroclors.
The Agency has not promulgated a treatment standard for total PCBs to date under the
LDR program. However, the Agency has promulgated treatment standards for
individual Aroclors in F039 and K085 wastes, which represent the only concentration-
based standards promulgated to date for these constituents. This universal standard is
established as 10 mg/kg in order that the treatment standard can be routinely met by
industry. The universal standard for total PCBs was determined based on the sum of the
following seven individual Aroclor standards:
1) Aroclor 1016: The treatment standard for Aroclor 1016 was
determined to be 0.92 mg/kg, based upon the F039 and K085
treatment standards, which represent the only concentration-based
standard promulgated to date for this constituent.
2) Aroclor 1221: The treatment standard for Aroclor 1221 was
determined to be 0.92 mg/kg, based upon the F039 and K085
treatment standards, which represent the only concentration-based
standard promulgated to date for this constituent
3) Aroclor 1232: The treatment standard for Aroclor 1232 was
determined to be 0.92 mg/kg, based upon the F039 and K085
treatment standards, which represent the only concentration-based
standard promulgated to date for this constituent.
NRJ-073 v ,
0629-Ol.nrj 6-47
-------
4) Aroclor 1242: The treatment standard for Aroclor 1242 was
determined to be 0.92 mg/kg, based upon the F039 and K085
treatment standards, which represent the only concentration-based
standard promulgated to date for this constituent.
5) Aroclor 1248: The treatment standard for Aroclor 1248 was
determined to be 0.92 mg/kg, based upon the F039 and K085
treatment standards, which represent the only concentration-based
standard promulgated to date for this constituent
6) Aroclor 1254: The treatment standard for Aroclor 1254 was
determined to be 1.8 mg/kg, based upon the F039 and K085
treatment standards, which represent the only concentration-based
standard promulgated to date for this constituent
7) Aroclor 1260:. The treatment standard for Aroclor 1260 was
determined to be 1.8 mg/kg, based upon the F039 and K085
treatment standards, which represent the only concentration-based
standard promulgated to date for this constituent
Hexachlorodibenzofurans
The universal standard for hexachlorodibenzofurans was determined to be
0.001 rng/kg, based upon the F039 treatment standard, which represents the only
concentration-based standard promulgated to date for this constituent
• Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins .
The universal standard for hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins was determined to
be 0.001 mg/kg, based upon the F039 treatment standard, which represents the only
concentration-based standard promulgated to date for this constituent.
NRI-073
0629-Ol.nrj 6-48
-------
Pentachlorodibenzofurans
The universal standard for pentachlorodibenzofurans was determined to be
0.001 mg/kg, based upon the F039 treatment standard, which represents the only
concentration-based standard promulgated to date for this constituent.
Pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins
* • '
The universal standard for pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins was determined to
be 0.001 mg/kg, based upon the F039 treatment standard, which represents the only
concentration-based standard promulgated to date for this constituent.
Tetrachlorodibenzofiirans
The universal standard for tetrachlorodibenzofurans was determined to be
0.001 mg/kg, based upon the F039 treatment standard, which represents the only
concentration-based standard promulgated to date for this constituent.
Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins
The universal standard for tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins was determined to
be 0.001 mg/kg, based upon the F039 treatment standard, which represents the only.
concentration-based standard promulgated to date for this constituent. •
. 6.1.13 Determination of Nonwastewater Universal Standards for Phthalates
Nonwastewater treatment performance data for the regulated constituents
in the phthalate treatability group are presented in Table 5-1. A constituent-by-
constituent discussion of the determination of the universal standards is given below.
NRJ-073 v
0629-01.nrj 6-49
-------
bis(2-Ethylhexyl) Phthalate
The universal standard for bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate was determined to be
28 mg/kg, based upon the F039, K086, and U028 treatment standards, which represent
- the only concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this
constituent
Butyl Benzyl Phthalate
The universal standard for butyl benzyl phthalate was determined to be 28
mg/kg, based upon the F039 and K086 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
The universal standard was established at 28 mg/kg to-maintain consistency within the
treatabuity group because the Agency believes that, in the analysis of butyl benzyl
phthalate, other phthalates may mask the correct concentration of this constituent in the
waste.
Diethyl Phthalate _
The universal standard for diethyl phthalate was determined to be 28
mg/kg, based upon the F039, U088, and K086 treatment standards, which represent the
only concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this
constituent.
Dimethyl Phthalate
^
The universal standard for dimethyl phthalate was determined to be 28
mg/kg, based upon the F039, U102, and K086 treatment standards, which represent the
only concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this
constituent. '
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nrj 6-50
-------
Di-n-butyl Phthalate
The universal standard for di-n-butyl phthalate was determined to be 28
mg/kg, based upon the F039, U069, and K086 treatment standards, which represent the
only concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this
constituent based on the performance of incineration.
Di-n-octyl Phthalate
The universal standard for di-n-octyl phthalate was determined to be 28
mg/kg, based upon the F039, U107, and K086 treatment standards, which represent the
only concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this
constituent.
Phthalic Anhydride (as measured by Phthalic Acid)
The universal standard for phthalic anhydride (as measured by phthalic
acid) was determined to be 28 mg/kg, based upon the K023, K024, K093, K094, and
U190 treatment standards, which represent the only concentration-based standards the
Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent. ,
Phthalic Anhydride (as measured by Phthalic Anhydride)
The universal standard for phthalic anhydride (as measured by phthalic
anhydride) was determined to be 28 mg/kg based upon the universal standard for
phthalic anhydride (as measured by phthalic acid). As discussed in Section 3.2.1, the
Agency is establishing a universal standard for phthalic anhydride (as measured by
phthalic anhydride) for use in cases where the concentration of phthalic anhydride in the
waste may not be accurately quantified by measuring the concentration of phthalic acid.
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nq v 5,5!
-------
6.1.14 Determination of Nonwastewater Universal Standards for Polynuclear
Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Nonwastewater treatment performance data for the regulated constituents
in the polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon treatability group are presented in Table 5-1.
A constituent-by-constituent discussion of the determination of the universal standards is
given below.
Acenaphthalene
The universal standard for acenaphthalene was determined to be 3.4
mg/kg, based upon the F039 and K087 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
Acenaphthene
The universal standard for acenaphthene was determined to be 3.4 mg/kg,
based upon the K035 treatment standard data. The Agency chose to use the K035
treatment standard data rather than the F039 treatment standard data because the F039
treatment standard was promulgated incorrectly as 4.0 mg/kg instead of 0.8 mg/kg (this
discrepancy is explained in Table 5-1). The Agency believes that a standard of 0.8
mg/kg may not be reasonably achieved based on detection limits reported for
acenaphthene in other incineration tests.
Anthracene
The universal standard for anthracene was determined to be 3.4 mg/kg,
based upon the K015 and K035 treatment standard data. The universal standard for
anthracene was not based upon the F039 treatment standard data because the F039
standard was promulgated incorrectly as 4.0 mg/kg instead of 0.8 mg/kg (this
NRJ-073 v
0629-OI.nr) 6-52
-------
discrepancy is explained in Table 5-1). The Agency believes that a standard of 0.8
mg/kg may not be reasonably achieved based upon detection limits reported for
anthracene from other incineration tests.
Benz(a)anthracene
The universal standard for benz(a)anthracene was determined to be 3.4
mg/kg, based upon the K035 treatment standard data. The Agency chose to use these
data because they represent a transfer of the accuracy correction factor and detection
limit from the same constituent as the constituent of concern. The Agency believes that
a universal standard of 3.4 mg/kg may be reasonably achieved based upon detection
limits reported for benz(a)anthracene in other waste codes.
Benzo(a)pyrene
The universal standard for benzo(a)pyrene was determined to be 3.4
mg/kg, based upon the K035 and K060 treatment standard data. The Agency chose to
use these data because they represent the use of both an accuracy correction factor and
detection limit from the same constituent as the constituent of concern. The Agency
believes that a universal standard of 3.4 mg/kg may be reasonably achieved based upon
the detection limits reported for benzo(a)pyrene in other waste codes.
The K060 treatment standard was calculated from the incorrect accuracy
correction factor (this discrepancy is explained in Table 5-1). The treatment
performance data transferred for the universal standard are correct.
Benzo(b)fluoranthene/Benzo(k)fluoranthene
The universal standard for the sum of benzo(b)fluoranthene and
benzo(k)fluoranthene was determined to be 6.8 mg/kg, based upon the F039 treatment
NRJ-073 v
0629-Ol.nrj 6-53
-------
standard, which represents the sum of the only concentration-based standards the Agency
has promulgated to date for these constituents. As explained in Section 3.2.1, these
constituents are regulated as a sum in universal standards to account for analytical •
problems in distinguishing the two compounds.
Benzo(&h,i)perylene
The universal standard for benzo(g,h,i)perylene was determined to be 1.8
mg/kg, based upon the F039 treatment standard, which represents the only
concentration-based treatment standard the Agency has promulgated to date for this
constituent. ' .
The F039 treatment standard was calculated from the incorrect accuracy
correction factor (this discrepancy is explained in Table 5-1). The treatment
performance data transferred for the universal standard are correct
Chrysene
The universal standard for chrysene was determined to be 3.4 mg/kg,
based upon the K087 and K035 treatment standard data. The Agency chose to use these
data because they represent the use of both an accuracy correction factor and detection
limit from the same constituent as the constituent of concern. The Agency believes that
a universal standard of 3.4 mg/kg may be reasonably achieved based upon detection
limits reported for chrysene in other waste .codes.
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
The universal standard .for dibenz(a,h)anthracene was determined to be 8.2
mg/kg, based upon the F039 and U063 treatment standard data. The Agency chose to
use these data because they represent the use of an actual matrix spike recovery. The
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nrj
-------
Agency believes that a treatment standard of 8.2 mg/kg may be reasonably achieved
based upon detection limits reported for dibenz(a,h)anthracene in other waste codes.
Fluoranthene
<"•
The universal standard for fluoranthene was determined to ie 3.4 mg/kg,
based upon the K035 and K087 treatment standard data. The Agency chose to use these
data because they represent the use of both the accuracy correction factor and detection
limit from the same constituent as the constituent of concern.
Fluorene
The universal standard for fluorene was determined to be 3.4 mg/kg, based
upon the K035 treatment standard data. The Agency chose to use these data rather than
the F039 treatment standard data. The F039 standard was promulgated incorrectly as
4.0 mg/kg instead of 0.8 mg/kg (this discrepancy is explained in Table 5-1). The Agency
believes that a standard of 0.8 mg/kg may'not be reasonably achieved based on detection
limits for fluorene from other incineration tests.
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pvrene
The universal standard for indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene was determined to be
3.4 mg/kg, based upon the K035 and K087 treatment standard data. The Agency chose
to use these data because they represent the transfer of both the accuracy correction
factor and detection limit from the same constituent as the constituent of concern.
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj
-------
3-MethyIcholanthrene
The universal standard for 3-methylcholanthrene was determined to be 15
mg/kg, based upon the F039 and U157 treatment standards, which represent the only
concentration-based standard the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
Naphthalene
The universal standard for naphthalene was determined to be 5.6 mg/kg,
based upon the K019 treatment standard data. The Agency chose to use these data
because they represent the use of an accuracy correction factor and detection limit from
the same constituent as the constituent of concern. The Agency chose a universal
standard of 5.6 mg/kg to account for regulatory flexibility based on variations in
treatment of this constituent
Phenanthrene
The universal standard for phenanthrene was determined to be 5.6 mg/kg,
based upon the K019 treatment standard data. The Agency chose to use these data
because they represent the use of an accuracy correction factor and detection limit from
the same constituent as the constituent of concern. The Agency chose a universal
standard of 5.6 mg/kg to account for regulatory flexibility based on variations in
treatment of this constituent.
Pyrene
The universal standard for pyrene was determined to be 8.2 mg/kg, based
upon the K035 and F039 treatment standard data. The Agency chose to use these data
because they represent the use of both an accuracy correction factor and detection limit
/
from the same constituent as the constituent of concern. The Agency believes that
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nij ^ 6-56
-------
transfer of data from K001 and U051, with a treatment standard of 1.5 mg/kg, is not
reasonable for a universal standard based on detection limits from other incineration
tests.
Determination of Universal Standards for Metal Constituents. Except
Vanadium and Chromium
The Agency determined universal standards for metal constituents using
the following methodology:
(1) The Agency selected metal constituents for regulation as presented
in Section 3.0;
(2) For each metal constituent selected, !the Agency listed BD AT
treatment performance data according to waste code in Table 5-3;
data included the concentration in the TCLP leachate. or the
detection limit of the constituent hi the treated waste, the accuracy
correction factor used (and its basis), and the variability factor; and
(3) The Agency evaluated the data on a constituent by constituent basis
to determine the data most appropriate to establish a universal
standard.
These steps are described in more detail below. . .
The development of universal standards for metal constituents began with
the selection of metal constituents selected for regulation from the BDAT List of
hazardous constituents. Section 3.0 explains the process for the selection of regulated
constituents for universal standards.
Universal standards for metal constituents, except chromium and vanadium,
were determined utilizing treatment performance data that had been used to develop
nonwastewater treatment standards in the First, Second, and Third Thirds and Phase I '
rulemaking efforts- The Agency developed a universal standard for vanadium based on
NRJ-073 ' ' • .
0629-Ol.nrj ' ' v 5.57
-------
available HTMR treatment performance data as discussed in Section 6.3. The Agency
developed a universal standard for chromium based on stabilization treatment
performance data as discussed in Section 6.4.
To determine a universal standard for a particular constituent, it was
necessary to examine the data used in calculating each promulgated treatment standard
. for- that constituent Table 5-3 presents the constituent-specific BOAT treatment
performance data for each waste code. The data used to compute the treatment
standard include the concentration of the constituent in the treated waste, an accuracy
correction factor, and a variability factor.
When treatment performance data were not available for treatment of a
specific waste code, data were transferred from treatment of a similar waste. Table 5-3
presents the constituent and treatment test from which the concentration in the treated
waste were transferred. This table also includes the basis for the transfer of an accuracy
correction factor. ,
Table 6-3 presents the determination of the universal standards for metal
constituents in nonwastewater forms of listed wastes. These universal standards were
chosen on a constituent-by-constituent basis. Five factors were considered in selecting a
treatment standard value for metal constituents, except for vanadium and chromium:
(1) Where possible, the Agency preferred to use treatment performance
data from the technology believed to be "best" for treatment of
metal constituents in universal standards wastes, HTMR;
(2) Where possible, the Agency preferred to use treatment performance
data (i.e., the concentration in the TCLP extract of the treated
waste, matrix spike recovery data, and variability factor (shown in
Table 5-3)) for the constituent of concern;
(3) The Agency evaluated the matrix spike recovery data to determine
whether the recoveries were within the acceptable range of values as
NRJ-073 •
0629-01.nij ' ' 6-58
-------
identified in EPA's Generic Quality Assurance Project Plan for
Land Disposal Restrictions Prop-am ("SPAT") (66);
(4)
and
The Agency examined the concentration in the TCLP extract of the
treated waste to determine if it could be routinely met by industry;
OTl/1
(5) The Agency compared the treatment standard corresponding to the
"best" data to the concentration in the TCLP extracts of the treated
waste obtained for other waste codes to determine if the constituent
could be treated to similar levels in similar waste codes.
The Agency preferred to use data from the performance of HTMR
processes to develop the universal standards for metal constituents in nonwastewater
forms of wastes, except arsenic, chromium, and mercury (as discussed in Section 4.2.2).
Since metals cannot be destroyed, treatment options are limited and typically include
technologies that can either recover the metal(s) or incorporate the metals in a stable
matrix resistant to leaching. The Agency believes that the "best" treatment for metal
constituents (except chromium, arsenic, and mercury) is recovery, especially in cases of
high waste metal concentrations. HTMR appears to be the most matrix-independent of
the applicable technologies (i.e., it consistently achieves the same levels of treatment
performance regardless of influent matrix compositions). HTMR also generally
decreases the amount of material sent for land disposal, and incorporates metals that are
not recoverable into a stable slag matrix.
The use of HTMR is consistent with the national policy, identified in the
Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) to RCRA, to reduce the quantity of
hazardous constituents disposed (this is in contrast to non-recovery technologies, such as
stabilization, which are not intended to reduce the total metal concentration or metal
volume in the waste and in fact, can increase volumes being sent to landfills). In
addition, because metals are recovered instead of land disposed, ore processing is
reduced, thus saving energy and pollution of another source.
NRJ-073
0629-01.nr| . V 5.59
-------
The Agency reviewed characterization and treatment performance data for
HTMR and stabilization of certain metal-bearing wastes to determine if universal
standards for metals based on HTMR would be technology forcing. These data, shown
in Tables 6-4 and 6-5, indicate that universal standards for most metals could be
achieved by stabilization for a wide variety of nonwastewater matrices, and therefore,
EPA believes that universal standards for metals that are based on HTMR would not be
technology forcing. Additional characterization and performance data for metal
constituents selected for regulation in universal standards may be found in the Final
Data Document for Characterization and Performance of High Temperature Metals
Recovery Treatment and Stabilization for Metal-Bearing NVvnwastewaters (67).
Table 6-3 summarizes the determination of the universal standards for the
metal constituents selected for regulation in nonwastewater forms of listed hazardous
wastes. This table includes the waste code, treatment performance data, and technology
from which the universal standard was transferred.
Table 5-3 presents nonwastewater treatment performance for the metal
constituents selected for regulation in universal standards, except vanadium and
chromium. A constituerit-by-constituent discussion of the determination of the universal
standards is given below.
Antimony
The universal standard for antimony was determined to be 2.1 mg/L in the
TCLP extract based upon the K061-HTMR treatment standard data. The Agency chose
to use these data because they represent the treatment performance of a HTMR process.
The universal standard for antimony was not based upon the K021 and F039 treatment
standard data because these data represent the performance of incineration, which is not
considered a demonstrated technology for metal constituents in .nonwastewater forms of
universal standard wastes.
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nij v 6-60
-------
Arsenic
The universal standard for arsenic was determined to be 5.0 mg/L in .the
TCLP extract based upon the F039 treatment standard. The F039 treatment standard
was established as equivalent to the toxicity characteristic (TC) regulatory level for
arsenic (0004).
The Agency established BDAT for arsenic as slag vitrification, as explained
in Section 4.2.2. The universal standard was not based upon K061-HTMR data because
the Agency believes that this technology is not "best" for treatment of arsenic in universal
standards wastes. The available slag vitrification treatment standard data (KQ31, K084,
K101, K102, P010, P011, P036, P038, and U136) show treatment to a leachate
concentration of 1.8 mg/L (using the Extraction Procedure (EP) toxicity test). The
universal standard based on this value would yield a standard of 5.6 mg/L using the EP
toxicity test. Because the characteristic level for arsenic of 5.0 mg/L in the TCLP extract
is similar hi magnitude to the standard calculated from slag vitrification, the Agency
believes that it is valid to default to the characteristic level for the universal standard for
arsenic.
Barium
The universal standard for barium was determined to be 7.6 mg/L hi the
TCLP extract based upon the K061-HTMR treatment standard data. The Agency chose
to use these data because they represent the treatment performance of a HTMR process.
The Agency believes that an universal standard based upon K061-HTMR treatment
standard data could be routinely met by industry using HTMR because the applicability
of the HTMR process is matrix-independent (i.e., the technology consistently achieves
the same levels of treatment performance regardless of influent matrix compositions).
Additionally, the Agency reviewed stabilization data and determined that the universal
standard for barium could be achieved by stabilization for a wide variety of waste
NRI-073
0629-Ol.nn 6-61
-------
matrices. The Agency, therefore, does not believe that the universal standard would be
technology forcing.
Beryllium
The universal standard for beryllium was determined to be 0.014 mg/L in
the TCLP extract based upon the K061-HTMR treatment standard data. The Agency
chose to use these data because they represent the only concentration-based
nonwastewater treatment standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this
constituent Additionally, these data represent the treatment performance of a HTMR
process.
Cadmium '
The universal standard for cadmium was determined to be 0.19 mg/L in
the TCLP extract based upon the K061-HTMR treatment standard data. The Agency
chose to use these data because they represent the treatment performance of a HTMR
process. The Agency believes that a universal standard based upon K061-HTMR
treatment standard data could be routinely met by industry because the applicability of
the HTMR process is matrix-independent (i.e., the technology consistently achieves the
same levels of treatment performance regardless of influent matrix compositions).
Additionally, the Agency reviewed stabilization treatment standard data for cadmium and
determined that the universal standard could be achieved by stabilization for a wide
variety of waste matrices. The Agency, therefore, does not believe that the universal
standard would be technology forcing. • . •
Lead
The universal standard for lead was determined to be 0.37 mg/L in the
TCLP extract based upon the K061-HTMR treatment standard data. The Agency chose
NRJ-073
0629-01.nij v. 6-62
-------
to use these data because they represent the treatment performance of a HTMR process.
The Agency believes that an universal standard based upon K061-HTMR treatment
standard data could be routinely met by industry because the applicability of the HTMR
process is matrix-independent (i.e., the technology consistently achieves the same levels
of treatment performance regardless of influent matrix compositions). Additionally, the
Agency reviewed the stabilization treatment standard data for lead and determined that
the universal standard could be achieved by stabilization for a wide variety of waste
matrices. The Agency, therefore, does not believe that the universal standard would be
technology forcing. .
Mercuiy
The Agency is establishing two universal standards for mercury, 0.20 mg/L
in the TCLP extract for low-mercury subcategory RMERC residues and 0.025 mg/L in
the TCLP extract for low-mercury subcategory non-RMERC residues. Low-mercury
subcategory wastes are mercury wastes containing concentrations of mercury less than
260 mg/kg. RMERC is the recovery of mercury by roasting/retorting.
The universal standard for mercury in low-mercury subcategory RMERC
residues was determined to be 0.20 mg/L in the TCLP extract. This determination was
based upon the K106, U151, P065, and P092 treatment standards for low-mercury
subcategory RMERC residues, which were established as equivalent to the TC regulatory
level for mercury (D009).
The universal standard for mercury in low-mercury subcategory non-
RMERC residues was determined to be 0.025 mg/L in the TCLP extract. This
determination was based upon the K071, F039, K106, and U151 treatment standard data
for low-mercury subcategory non-RMERC residues. The Agency chose to use these
data because they represent the treatment performance of the technology selected as
BDAT for mercury in low-mercury subcategory wastes, acid leaching.
NRJ-073
OttMLmj
-------
Nickel
The universal standard for nickel was determined to be 5.0 mg/L in the
TCLP extract based upon the K061-HTMR treatment standard data. The Agency chose
to use these data because they represent the treatment performance of a HTMR process.
The Agency believes that an universal standard based upon K061-HTMR treatment
standard data could be routinely met by industry because the applicability of the HTMR
process is matrix-independent (i.e., the technology consistently achieves the same levels
of treatment performance regardless of influent matrix compositions). Additionally, the
Agency reviewed stabilization treatment standard data for nickel and determined that the
universal standard could be achieved by stabilization for a wide variety of waste matrices.
The Agency, therefore, does not believe that the universal standard would be technology
forcing.
The Agency recognizes the difference in magnitude between the universal .
standard for nickel and the universal standards for other metals and will further evaluate
this at a later time. . •
Selenium .
The universal standard for selenium was determined to be 0.16 mg/L in
the TCLP'extract based upon the K061-HTMR treatment standard data. The Agency
chose to use these data because they represent the treatment performance of a HTMR
process. The Agency believes that a universal standard based upon K061-HTMR
treatment standard data could be routinely met by industry because the applicability of
the HTMR process is matrix-independent (i.e., the technology consistently achieves the
same levels of treatment performance regardless of influent matrix compositions).
Additionally, the Agency, reviewed stabilization data and determined that the universal
standard for selenium could be achieved by stabilization for a wide variety of waste
matrices. The Agency, therefore, does not believe that the universal standard would be
technology forcing. ,
NRJ-073
0629-01.nij V 6-64
-------
Silver
The universal standard for silver was determined to be 0.30 mg/L in the
TCLP extract based upon the K061-HTMR treatment standard data. The Agency chose
to use these data because they represent the treatment performance of a HTMR process.
The Agency believes that an universal standard based upon K061-HTMR treatment
standard data could be routinely met by industry because the applicability of the HTMR
process is matrix-independent (i.e., the technology consistently achieves the same levels of
treatment performance regardless of influent matrix compositions). Additionally, the
Agency reviewed stabilization treatment standard data for silver and determined that the
universal standard could be achieved by stabilization for a wide variety of waste matrices.
The Agency, therefore, does not believe that the universal standard would be technology
forcing. .
Thallium
The universal standard for thallium was determined to be 0.078 mg/L in the
TCLP extract based upon the K061-HTMR treatment standard data. The Agency chose
to use these data because they represent the only concentration-based nonwastewater
treatment standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent.
Additionally, these data represent the treatment performance of a HTMR process.
Zinc3
The universal standard for zinc was determined to be 53 mg/L in the TCLP
extract based upon the K061-HTMR treatment standard data. The Agency chose to use
these data because they represent the only concentration-based nonwastewater treatment
standards the Agency has promulgated to date for this constituent. Additionally, these
data represent the treatment performance of a HTMR process.
3
Zinc is not an underlying hazardous constituent in characteristic wastes.
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nrj g-65
-------
63 Calculation of Universal Standard for Vanadium
The Agency has not promulgated a treatment standard for vanadium in
nonwastewater forms of a listed hazardous waste to date. However, the Agency believes
that this constituent has the potential to be listed as a constituent of concern in a waste
code applicable to universal standards in the future. Therefore, the Agency is developing
a universal standard for vanadium using available HTMR treatment performance data.
Table 5-4 presents the available HTMR treatment performance, data for
vanadium. The HTMR performance data represent HTMR treatment of K061 used in
the development of K061-HTMR treatment standards.
^ •
The Agency is developing a universal standard for vanadium using the
following methodology: .
(1) , Four sets of HTMR treatment performance data were selected as
representative of well-designed and well-operated processes.
(2) BDAT treatment performance data for vanadium (from HTMR of
K061, F006, K062) were reviewed, as presented in Table 5-4. These
data include the concentration in the TCLP leachate or detection
limit of the constituent in the treated waste, accuracy correction
factor used (and its basis), and the variability factor.
(3) Treatment standards were determined individually for each of the
four sets of data representing a different HTMR process (as
presented in Table 5-4). The four sets of standards were then
compared to one another. Based on this comparison, the Agency
selected the highest standard for vanadium from each of the four
processes to allow for process variability and potential detection
limit differences. -
Table 6-3 summarizes the determination of the universal standard for .
vanadium in nonwastewater forms of wastes. This table includes the waste code,
NRJ-073
062W)l.nrj v • 6r66
-------
treatment performance data, and technology from which the universal standard was
transferred.
Table 5-4 presents nonwastewater treatment performance for vanadium.
The universal standard for vanadium was determined to be 0.23 mg/L in the TCLP
extract based upon the treatment standard developed from the International Mills
Service (IMS) HTMR treatment performance data. These data represent the highest
potential treatment standard for vanadium from each of the four processes to allow for
process variability and potential detection limit differences in treatment. The Agency
notes that although vanadium has not been previously regulated, universal treatment
standards for vanadium are being established based on the performance of HTMR that
was determined to be BDAT for vanadium in K061 nonwastewaters.
6.4 Calculation of Universal Standard for Chromium
As discussed in Section 53, the Agency is developing a universal standard
for chromium based on the stabilization treatment performance data presented in Table
5-5. EPA evaluated waste characterization and treatment performance data for
chromium from several sources, including data on the performance of HTMR and
stabilization technologies for treating chromium. EPA selected the stabilization data
presented in Table 5-5 to develop the universal standard for chromium because these
data represent treatment of chromium in difficult to treat wastes, including stripping
liquids, plating and pelletizing operation wastes, and cleanout wastes from plating tanks.
The Agency believes that these data represent effluent values that can be routinely
achieved by industry.
Table 6-3 summarizes the determination of the universal standard for
chromium in nonwastewater forms of wastes. This table includes the waste code,
treatment performance data, and technology from which the universal standard was
transferred. The universal standard for chromium was determined to be 0.86 mg/L in
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.ntj
-------
the TCLP extract based upon the treatment standard developed from the stabilization
treataent performance data presented in Table 5-5.
6.5 Application of Universal Standards to Petroleum Refining Wastes
In the Third Third rulemaking, the Agency developed BDAT treatment
standards for the petroleum refining wastes, K048, K049, K050, K051, and K052, based
on solvent extraction treatment performance data. Additionally, in the Phase I
mlemaking, the Agency promulgated BDAT treatment standards for the petroleum
refining waste codes F037 and F038 based upon a transfer of the K048, K049, K050,
K051, and K052 treatment standards for the corresponding regulated constituents..
Under this mlemaking, the Agency is applying universal standards to the regulated
constituents in K048, K049, K050, K051, K052, F037, and.F038 wastes.
The Agency determined the universal standards for the regulated
constituents in the petroleum refining wastes based upon the treatment performance of
incineration. Both solvent extraction and incineration were determined to be BDAT for
these wastes in the previous rulemakings. The Agency's application of the universal
standards to petroleum refining wastes is based on the expectation that these wastes can
be treated to the universal standards by non-combustion technologies, including solvent
extraction. . .
The Agency believes that the regulated community may be able to achieve
the universal standards using solvent extraction treatment based on its evaluation of the
available solvent extraction treatment performance data, summarized in Table 6-6.
Appendix B of EPA's Final Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAT)
Background Document for Newly Listed Refinery Wastes F037 and F038 (72) presents
more detail on these treatment data. .
NRJ-073
062W)l.nq 6-68
-------
The Agency has determined that eleven of the twenty data sets presented
in Table 6-6 indicated treatment of petroleum wastes using solvent extraction to levels
below the universal standards. The other nine data sets indicate treatment of petroleum
wastes using solvent extraction to below the universal standards for most of the regulated
constituents (benzene, o-cresol, p-cresol, di-n-butyl phthalate, ethylbenzene, bis(2-
ethylhexyl) phthalate, phenol, toluene, and total xylenes). These nine data sets, however,
did not represent solvent extraction treatment to below the universal standards for the
following constituents: anthracene, benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(a)pyrene, chrysene,
naphthalene, phenanthrene, and pyrene.
As part of its evaluation of the solvent extraction data, the Agency
considered the influence of the waste matrix on the effectiveness of solvent extraction
treatment. As explained in EPA's Treatment Technology Background Document (5), the
performance of solvent extraction treatment is somewhat matrix dependent. Based on an
evaluation of the untreated waste matrices corresponding to the solvent extraction
treatment performance data in Table 6-6, the Agency believes that the solvent that is
used will "dissolve" constituents for which it has the most affinity in the waste matrix,
including non-regulated waste constituents. Once saturated, the solvent is not physically
or chemically able to remove additional constituents. Therefore, high loadings of organic
compounds in the untreated waste matrix, regardless of whether these compounds are
the regulated constituents, could produce treated waste residuals with concentrations of
the regulated constituents at levels higher than the universal standards.
The Agency believes, however, that the regulated community can adjust the
solvent extraction treatment system, in these cases, to generate treatment residuals with
concentrations of regulated constituents that are lower than the universal standards. The
Agency has identified three possible methods for modifying solvent extraction systems to
meet the universal standards. .
VRJ-073
0629-Ol.nq
-------
First, facilities could conduct multiple runs of the waste through the
treatment system. Because this increases the contact time between the waste and
solvent, a greater quantity of the regulated constituents may be removed from the waste.
Second, facilities could adjust the design and operation of the solvent
extraction treatment units. More rigorous extraction conditions, such as operating at
higher temperatures and pressures, may improve the solvent extraction system's
efficiency. Longer residence times in the system may increase the contact time between
the waste and. the solvent, thereby resulting in more effective treatment. Finally, more
rigorous mixing may ensure better contact between the waste and the solvent, and longer
settling times, thereby achieving greater separation of the solvent-extracted constituents
from the waste.
Third, the percentage of water, solids, and oil and grease in the waste may
also significantly impact solvent extraction performance. The Agency believes that it
may be possible to increase the efficiency of the solvent extraction treatment system by
pretreating the waste to reduce the amount of water, solids, and oil and grease.
Therefore, the Agency believes that a well-designed and well-operated
solvent extraction treatment system can treat petroleum refining wastes to below the
universal standards. The Agency believes that by replacing the previously promulgated
•
treatment standards for the petroleum refining wastes with the universal standards for
the corresponding regulated constituents, it is avoiding the mandate of a technology-
forcing approach to regulating these wastes. This assertion is supported by the available
solvent extraction treatment performance data which indicate that this treatment
technology can meet the universal standards.
NRJ-073
0629-OI.nrj v 6-70
-------
Table 6-1
Summary of Universal Standards and Guide to Locating Constituent-Specific
Discussions of the Determination of Universal Standards
Constituent Selected Tor Regulation
Treatability Group
Waste Code from Which
Universal! Standard Data
Were Transferred
Organic Constituents II
Accnaphthalcnc
Accnaphthenc
Acetone
Acetonitrile
Acetophenone
2-Acetylaminofluorene
Acrylamide
Acrylonitrile
Aldrin
Aniline
Anthracene
Benz(a)anthracene
Benzal Chloride
Benzene
Ben/.o(b)fluoranthehe/Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Oxygenated Hydrocarbons
Organo-Nitrogen Compounds
Oxygenated Hydrocarbons
Organo-Nitrogen Compounds
Organo-Nitrogen Compounds
Organo-Nitrogen Compounds
Chlorinated Pesticides
Organo-Nitrogen Compounds
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Halogenated Volatiles
Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
F039, K087
K035
F039, K086, U002, F001-
F005
K011, K013, K014
F039, U004, K086
F039, U005
K011, K013, K014
F039, U009
F039, P004
F039, U012, K083
K015, K035
K035
K015
K083
F039
Universal
Standard
(wg/kg)
3.4
3.4
160
1.8
9.7
140
23
84
0.066
14
3.4
3.4
6.0
10
6.8 (sum)
Location of
Constituent-
Specific
Discussion
(page numbers)
6-52, 6-109
6-52,6-109
6-43,6-104
6-35,6-100
6-43, 6-104
6-35, 6-100
6-35. 6-100
6-36. 6-100
6-7, 6-87
6-36, 6-100
6-52, 6-109
6-53, 6-109
6-20,6-94
6-4, 6-85
6-53, 6-109
NRJ-073
0629-03.nrj
6-71
-------
Table 6-1
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for Regulation
TreatabUlty Group
Waste Code from Which
Universal Standard Dati
Were Transferred ;:
Organic Constituents (Cont'd.) I :i
Bcnzo(ghi)perylcne •
Bcnzo(a)pyrcnc
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
ddta-BHC
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform (Tribromomethane)
4-BromophenyI Phenyl Ether
Bromomethane (Methyl Bromide)
n-Butanol
Butyl Benzyl Phthalate
2-sec-Bulyl-4,6-dinitrophcnol (Dihoseb)
Carbon Disulfide
Polynudear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Polynudear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Chlorinated Pesticides
Chlorinated Pestiddes
Chlorinated Pestiddes
Chlorinated Pestiddes
Organo-Bromines
Organo-Bromines
Organo-Bromines
Organo-Bromines
Oxygenated Hydrocarbons
Phthalates
Nonchlorinated Phenolics
Carbon Disulfide
F039
K035.KQ60
P039, U129
F039, U129
F039.U129
F039, U129
F039
F039.U225
F039, U030
FD39, U029, K117, K118,
K131, K132, K136
F039, K086, U031, F001-
F005
F039.K086
F039, POM
F001-F005
Universal
Standard
(ing/leg)
Location of
Constituent-
Spedflc
Discussion
(page numbers)
1.8
3.4
0.066
0.066
0.066
0.066
15
15
15
15
2.6
28
2.5
4.8 mg/L
(TCLP)
6-54, 6-109
6-53, 6-109
6-7, 6-87
6-7, 6-87
6-7, 6-87
6-8, 6-87
6-33, 6-99
6-33, 6-99
6-33, 6-99'
6-33, fr99
6-43, 6-104
6-50, 6-108
6-30, 6-98
6-6, 6-86
NRJ-073
0629-03.nrj.
6-72
-------
Table 6-1
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for Regulation
TreatabHity Group
Waste Code from Which
Universal Standard Data!
Were Transferred ;
Organic Constituents (Cont'd.) 1
Carbon Tctrachloridc
Chlordanc
p-Chloroanilinc
Chlorobenzenc
2-ChIoro- 1 ,3-but adicne
Chlorodibromomethane
Chloroethane
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
Chloroform
bis(2-ChloroisopropyI)ether
p-Chloro-m-cresol
Chloromethane
2-Chloronaphthalcne
Halogenated Volatiles
Chlorinated Pesticides
Organo-Nitrogen Compounds
Chlorobenzenes
Haiogenated Volatiles
Organo-Bromines
Halogenated Volatiles
Halogenated Volatiles
Halogenated Volatiles
Halogenated Volatiies
Halogenated Volatiles
Chlorinated Phenolics and
Derivatives
Halogenated Volatiles
Oxygenated Hydrocarbons
K021, K073
K032, K097
F039, P024
K019, F039, U037, F001-
F005
FQ24
F039
F039, K018
F039, U024
K019
K009, K010, K019, K029,
F025, K021, K073
F039, U027
F039, U039
F039, U045
F039, U047
Universal
.Standard
<«ng/kg>
6.0
0.26
16
6.0
0.28
15
6.0
7.2
6.0
6.0
7.2
14
30
5.6
Location of
Constituent-
Specific
Discussion
(page numbers)
6-20,6-94
6-8,6-87
6-36, 6-100
6-16, 6-92
6-20, 6-94
6-34, 6-99
6-20,6-94
6-21.6-94
6-21, 6-94
6-21, 6-94
6-21.6-94
6-13, 6-90
6-22, 6-94
6-44, 6-104
NRJ-073
0629-03.ntj
6-73
-------
Table 6-1
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for Regulation '
Treatoblllty Group
Waste Code from Which
Universal Standard Data
Were Transferred .
Organic Constituents (Cont'd.)
2-Chlorophenol
3-Chloropropcne
Chryscne
Cresol (m- and p-isomers)
(3-MelhyIphenol, 4-Melhylphenol)
o-Cresol (2-Mcthylphenol)
Cyclohexanone
o,p'-DDD '
p,p'-DDD
o,p'-DDE
p,p'-DDE
o,p'-DDT
p,p'-DDT
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
1 ,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
Chlorinated Phenolics and
Derivatives
Halogenated Volatiies
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Nonchlorinated Phenolics
Nonchlorinated Phenolics
Oxygenated Hydrocarbons
Chlorinated Pesticides
Chlorinated Pesticides
Chlorinated Pesticides
Chlorinated Pesticides
Chlorinated Pesticides
Chlorinated Pesticides
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Organo-Bromines
P039, U048
F039
KQ35, K087
F039, U052, F001-F005
F039, U052, F001-F005
F001-F005
F039, U060, U061
F039, U060, U061
F039.U061
F039, U061
F039, U061
F039, U061
F039, U063
FD39, U066
Universal
Standard
(rag/kg)
5.7
30
3.4
5.6
5.6
0.75 mg/L
(TCLP)
0.087
0.087
0.087
0.087
0.087
0.087
8.2
15
Location of
Constituent-
Specific
Discussion
(page numbers)
6-13, 6-90
6-22, 6-95
6-54,6-109
6-30, 6-98
6-30, 6,98
6-44, 6-104
6-8, 6-87
6-8, 6-87
6-9, 6-87
6-9, 6-88
6-9, 6-88
6-9, 6-88
6-54, 6-109
6-34, 6-99
NRJ-073
0629-03.nrj
6-74
-------
Table 6-1
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for Regulation
'
Dibromomethane
tris-(2,'3-Dibromopropyl) phosphate
m-Dichlorobenzene
o-Dichlorobenzene
p-Dichlorobenzcne
Dichlorodifluoromethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroelhylene
trans-l,2-Dichloroethylene
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,6-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid (2,4-D)
n i
TreatabUily Group
•'" " ' ! " ! ! ggBg-aHeaR!' i i i.— — —n ^ i i "ft-
Waste Code from Which
Universal Standard Data
Weit Transferred
Organic Constituents (Cont'd.) r
Organo-Bromines
Organo-Bromines
Chlorobenzenes
Chlorobenzenes
Chlorobenzenes
Halogenated Volatiles
Halogenated Volatiles
Halogenated Volatiles
Halogenated Volatiles
Halogenated Volatiles
Chlorinated Phenolics and
Derivatives
Chlorinated Phenolics and
Derivatives
Chlorinated Phenolics and
Derivatives
F039, U068
U235
F039, U071
F039, K086, U070, F001-
F005
F039, U072
P039, U075
K018, K028
K018, K019, K020, F025,
K029
K029, F025
F039, U079
F039, U081
F039, U082
F039, U240
Universal
Standard
(rag/kg)
15
0.10
6.0
6.0
6.0
7.2
60
6.0
6.0
30
14
14
10
Location of
Constituent*
Specific
Discussion
(page numbers)
6-34 6-99
6-34,6-99
6-17 6-92
6-17, 6-92
6-17, 6-92
6-22 6-95
6-22, 6-95
••' "• "' ' ii .m««iii»ii»»
6-23, 6-95
6-23 6-95
6-24, 6-95
6-14, 6-90
6-14, 6-90
6-14, 6-90
NRJ-073
0629-Olnrj
, 6-75
-------
Table 64
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for Regulation •
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis- 1 ,3-Dichloropropcnc
trans-l,3-Dichloropropenc
Dieldrin
Diethyl Phthalatc
2,4-Dimethy) Phenol
Dimethyl Phthalate
Di-n-butyl Phthalate
1,4-Dinitrobenzenc
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Di-n-octyl Phthalate
1,4-Dioxane
Diphenylamine/Diphenylnitrosamine
TreatabUlty Group
Waste Code from Which J
Universal Standard D»t»|
. Were Transferred .%f
Organic Constituents (Cont'd.) i
Halogenated Volatilcs
Halogenated Volatiles
Halogenated Volatiles *
Chlorinated Pesticides
Phthalates
Nonchlorinated Phenolics
Phthalates
Phthalates
Organo-Nitrogen Compounds
Nonchlorinated Phenolics
Nonchlorinated Phenolics
Organo-Nitrogen Compounds
Organo-Nitrogen Compounds
Phthalates
Oxygenated Hydrocarbons
Organo-Nitrogen Compounds
F039, K017, U083
F039, U084
F039, U084
P039.P037
F039, K086, U088
F039, U101
F039, K086, U102
F039, K086, U069
F039
F039, P047
F039,P048
F039, U105, Kill
F039, U106, Kill
F039, K086, U107
F039, U108
K022
Universal
Standard
dug/kg)
;; ,
18
18
18
0.13
28
14
28
28
23
160
160
140
28
28
170
13 (sum)
Location of
Constituent-
Specific
Discussion
(page numbers)
6-24, 6-95
6-24, 6-95
6-24, 6-95
6-9, 6-88
6-50, 6-108
. 6-31, 6-98
6-50, 6-108
6-51, 6-108
6-36, 6-100
6-31, 6-98
6-31,6-98
6-37, 6-100
6-37, 6-100
6-51, 6-108
6-44, 6-104
6-37, 6-101
NRJ-073
0629-03.nrj
6-76
-------
Table 6-1
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for Regulation
.
Di-n-propylnitrosamine
Disulfoton
Endosulfan I
Endosulfan II
Endosulfan Sulfatc
Endrin
Endrin Aldehyde
Ethyl Acetate
Ethyl Ether
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Ethyl Methacrylate
Ethylbenzene
Ethylcne Dibromide (1,2-Dibromoethane)
Famphur
Fluoranthene
Treatabllity Group
Waste Code from Which
Universal Standard Data
Were Transferred
Organic Constituents (Cont'd.)
Organo-Nitrogen Compounds
Organo-Sulfur Pesticides
Chlorinated Pesticides
Chlorinated Pesticides
Chlorinated Pesticides
Chlorinated Pesticides
Chlorinated Pesticides
Oxygenated Hydrocarbons
Oxygenated Hydrocarbons
Phthalates
Oxygenated Hydrocarbons
Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Organo-Bromines
Organo-Sulfur Pesticides
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
F039, Ulll
F039
F039, P050
F039, P050
F039, P050
F039, P051
F039, P051
F039, K086, U112, F001-
F005
F039, U117, F001-F005
F039, K086
F039, U118
F039, K086, F001-F005
F039.U067, K117, K118,
K136
F039
K035, K087
Universal
Standard
(rag/kg)
14
6.2
0.066
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
33
160
28
160
10
15
15
3.4
Location of 1
Constituent* I
Specific |
Discussion Ij
(page numbers) 1
' "••:" 1
6-37, 6-100 |
6-41, 6-103
6-10, 6-88
6-10, 6-88
6-10, 6-88 II
6-10, 6-88
6-10, 6-89
6-44, 6-104
6-45, 6-104
6-50, 6-108
6-45, 6-104
f -
6-5, 6-85
6-34, 6-99
6-41, 6-103
6-55, 6-109 1
NRJ-073
0629-03.nrj
6-77
-------
Table 6-1
(Continued)
Constituent Selected Tor Regulation
TreatablHty Group
Waste Code from Which
Universal Standard Data
Wer* Transferred :
Universal
Standard
(rag/kg)
Location of
Constituent-
Specific
Discussion
(page numbers)
Organic Constituents (Cont'd.) :
-------
Table 6-1
%
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for Regulation
Kcpone
Mcthacrylonitrile
Methanol
Methapyrilcne
Methoxychlor
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone .
Methyl Methacrylate
Methyl Parathion
3-Methylcholanthrene
Methylene Chloride
4,4'-Methylenc-bis(2-chloroaniline)
Naphthalene
o-Nitroaniline
Treatabillty Group
Waste Code from Which
Universal Standard Data
Were Transferred ',
Organic Constituents (Cont'd.)
Chlorinated Pesticides
Organo-Nitrogen Compounds
Oxygenated Hydrocarbons
Organo-Nitrogen Compounds
Chlorinated Pesticides
Oxygenated Hydrocarbons
Oxygenated Hydrocarbons
Oxygenated Hydrocarbons
Organo-Sulfur Pesticides
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Halogenated Volatiles
Halogenated Volatiles
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Organo-Nitrogen Compounds
P039, U142
F039, U152
F001-F005
F039, U155
F039.U247
F039, K086, U159, F001-
F005
F039, R086, U161, F001-
F005
F039, U162
F039
F039, U157
F039, K086, U080, F001-
F005
F039, U158
K019
K101
55B5BBSSB55BB3SB
Universal
Standard
(rag/kg)
0.13
84
0.75 mg/L
(TCLP)
1.5
0.18
36
33
160
4.6
15
30
30
5.6
14
Location of
Constituent-
Specific
Discussion
(page numbers)
6-12, 6-89
; 6-38, 6-101
6-45, 6-105
• -6-38, 6-101
6-12,6-89 II
6-46, 6-105
6-46,6-105
6-46, 6-105
6-42, 6-103
6-55 6-109
6-25, 6-96
.
6-26 6-96 II
' J
6-56, 6-110
6-32, 6-101 II
NRJ-073.
0629-03.nrj
6-79
-------
Table 64
*
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for Regulation •
"•""?:'- .••.
TreatabUify Group ,
Waste Code from Which
Universal Standard Datu .
Were Transferred ••
Universal
Standard
(rag/kg)
Location of
Constituent'
Specific
Discussion
(page numbers)
Organic Constituents (Cont'd.)
p-Nitroanilinc
Nitrobenzene
N-Nitroso-di-n-butylaminc
N-Nitrosodielhylamine
N-Nilrosodimethylamine
N-Nitrosomethylethylamine
N-NitrosomorphoIine
N-Nitrosopiperidine •
N-Nitrosopyrrolidine
o-Nitrophenol
p-Nitropheno!
5-Nitro-o-toluidine
Parathion .
Pentachlorobenzene
Pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins
Pentachlorodibenzofurans
Organo-Nitrogen Compounds
Organo-Nitrogen Compounds
Organo-Nitrogen Compounds
Organo-Nitrogen Compounds
Organo-Nitrogen Compounds
Organo-Nitrogen Compounds
Organo-Nitrogen Compounds
Organo-Nitrogen Compounds
Organo-Nitrogen Compounds
Nonchlorinated Phenolics
Nonchlorinated Phenolics
Organo-Nitrogen Compounds
Organo-Sulfur Pesticides
Chlorobenzenes
PCBs and Dioxins
PCBs and Dioxins
F039.P077
F039, K086, U169, K083,
P001-F005
F039, U172
F039, U174
F039
F039
F039
F039, U179
F039, U180
K102
F039, U170
F039, U181
F039
K042, K085
F039
F039
28
14
17
28
23
23
23
35
35
13
29
28
4.6
10
0.001
0.001
6-38, 6-101
6-38,6-101
6-39, 6-101
6-39, 6-102
6-39, 6-101
6-39, 6-101
6-39, 6-102
6-40, 6-102
6-40, 6-102
6-31, 6-98
6-32, 6-98
6-39, 6-101
6-42, 6-103
6-18, 6-92
6-49, 6-107
6-49,6-107
NRJ-073
0629-03.nij
6-80
-------
Table 6-1
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for Regulation
Treatabillty Group
Waste Code from Which
Universal Standard Date ;
Were Transferred i
Organic Constituents (Cont'd.) Jl *
Pentachlorocthane
Pcntachloronilrobenzenc
Pentachlorophcnol
Phenacctin
Phenanthrene
Phenol
Phorate
Phthalic Anhydride
Phthalic Anhydride (as measured by Phthalic
Acid)
Pronamide
Propanenitrile (Ethyl Cyanide)
Pyrene
Pyridine
Safrole
Halogenated Volatiles
Chlorobenzenes
Chlorinated Phenolics and
Derivatives
Organo-Nitrogen Compounds
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Nonchlorbated Phenolics
Organo-Sulfur Pesticides
Phthalates
Phthalates
Organo-Nitrogen Compounds
Organo-Nitrogen Compounds
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Organo-Nitrogen Compounds
Oxygenated Hydrocarbons
K018, K028, K030, K095,
K096
F039, U185
P039, K001, U051
F039, U187
K019
F039, U188, K083
F039
K023, K024, K093, K094,
U190
K023, K024, K093, K094,
U190
F039, U192
F039, P101
K035, F039
F039, U196, F001-F005
F039, U203
Universal
Standard
(rag/kg)
6.0
4.8
7.4
16
5.6
6.2
4.6
28
28
1.5
. 360
8.2
16
22
Location of
Constituent*
Specific
Discussion
(page numbers)
6-26, 6-%
6-19, 6-92
6-14,6-90
6-40,6-102
6-56, 6-110
6-32. 6-98
6-42. 6-103
6-51, 6-108
6-51, 6-108
6-40, 6-102
6-40, 6-102
6-56, 6-110
6-40, 6-102
6-46, 6-105
NRJ-073
(Xi2y-03.nrj
6-81
-------
Table 6-1
i
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for Regulation .
Treatablllty Group
Waste Code from Which
Universal Standard Data
Wen transferred
* . Organic Constituents (Cont'd.) ;.
Silvex (2,4,5-TP)
1,2,4,5-Tclrachlorobeny.enc
Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins
Tetrachlorodibenzofurans
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroc thane
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
Toluene (Methyl Benzene)
Total PCBs
Toxaphene
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichlproeihane
Chlorinated Phenolics and
Derivatives
Chlorobenzenes
PCBs and Dioxins
PCBs and Dioxins
Halogenated Volatiles
Halogenated Volatiles
Halogenated Volatiles
Chlorinated Phenolics and .
Derivatives
Aromatic Hydrocarbons
PCBs and Dioxins
Chlorinated Pesticides
Chlorobenzene
Halogenated Volatiles
Halogenated Volatiles
F039 ;
K030
F039
P039
K028, K095, K096
K020, K028, K095, K096
K016, K019, K020, K028,
K030, K073, K09S, K096
F039
K01S
F039, K085
K041,K098
F039, K019, K030, K096
K018, K019, K028, K029,
K073
F025
Universal
Standard
(rag/kg)
7.9
14
0.001
0.001
6.0
6.0
6.0
7.4
10
10
2.6
19
6.0
6.0
Location of
Constituent-
Specific
Discussion
(page numbers)
6-14,6-90
6-19, 6-92
6-49, 6-107
6-49, 6-107
6-26, 6-96
6-27,6-96
6-27, 6-97
6-15, 6-90
6-5, 6-85
6-47, 6-107
6-12, 6-89
6-19, 6-93
6-27, 6-97
6-28, 6-97
NRI-073
0629-03.nij
6-82
-------
Table 6-1
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for Regulation
- .
Trichloroclhylcnc
Trichloromonofluoromclhane
(Fluorotrichloromcthanc)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxyacetic Acid (2,4,5-T)
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
l,l,2-TrichIoro-l,2(2-trifluoroethane
Vinyl Chloride
Xylene(s) (total)
1 mi ===c========a
.•;.|' i'-: :
TreatabWty Group
Waste Cede from Which
Universal Standard Data
Were Transferred
Organic Constituents (Cont'd.)
Halogenated Volatiles .
Halogenated Volatiles
Chlorinated Phenolics and
Derivatives
Chlorinated Phenolics and
Derivatives
Chlorinated Phenolics and
Derivatives
Halogenated Volatiles
Halogenated Volatiles
Halogenated Volatiles
Aromatic Hydrocarbons
F001-P005, F025, F039,
K086, U228, K095, K096
F039, U121, POOJ-F005
F039
P039
F039
F039, K017
F039, F001-F005
K029
K001, U051, F001-F005
Universal
Standard
(rag/kg)
6.0
30
7.4
7.4
7.9
30
30
6.0
30
Location of
Constituent-
Specific
Discussion
(page numbers)
6-28, 6-97
6-28, 6-97
6-15, 6-91
6-16, 6-91
6-15, 6-90
6-29, 6'97
6-29, 6-97
6-29, 6-97
6-6. 6-85
NRJ-073
062!M)3.nrj
6-83
-------
Table 6-1
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for Regulation
Treatability Group
Watte Code from Which
Universal Standard Data
Were Transferred
Universal Standard (tng/L
(TCW))
Location of
Constituent-SpeclUc
Discussion (page
numbew)
Met*J Constituents :,-".,
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Metal Constituents
Metal Constituents
Metal Constituents
Metal Constituents
Metal Constituents
Metal Constituents
Metal Constituents
Metal Constituents
Metal Constituents
Metal Constituents
Metal Constituents
Metal Constituents
Metal Constituents
Metal Constituents
K061
0004
K061
K061
K061
D007
K061
D009
K071
K061
K061
K061
K061
K061
K061
2.1
5.0
7.6
0.014
0.19
0.86
037
0.20 (Low-mercuiy tubcalegoiy
wastes' -RMERC? residues)
0.025 (Low-mercuiy t ubcategoiy
wattes^ - Non-RMERC* residue*)
5.0
0.16
0.30
0.078
0.23
5.3
6-60, 6-111
6-61, 6-111
6-61, 6-111
6-62, 6-111
6-62, 6-111
6-67, 6-111
6-62, 6-112
6-63, 6-112
6-64, 6-113
6-64, 6-113
6-65, 6-113
6-65, 6-113
6-66, 6-113
6-65, 6-113
•Low-mercury subcategory wastes = Mercury wastes containing concentrations of mercury less than 260 mg/kg.
bRMERC = Mercury recovery by roasting/retorting.
NRJ-073
0629-03.nrj
6-84
-------
Table 6-2
Determination of Universal Treatment Standards for Organic Constituents (Nonwastewaters)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
Benzene
Ethylhenzene
/ •
Toluene
Xylene(s) (total)
Waste Code from
Which Universal
Standard Data
Were Transferred
Treatment Test
from Which
Performance Data*
Were Transferred
K083
F039, K086,
F001-F005
K015
K001, U051,
F001-F005
K019
K019
KOI9
K001-C
Constituent from Which
the Concentration fa
Treated Waste Was
Transferred
Concentration in
Treated Waste
(rag/kg)
Ccrattitaent from Which
the Accuracy Correction:
Data Were Transferred
Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Benzene
Ethylbenzene.
Toluene
Xylenes
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<10.0
Benzene
Ethylbenzene
Toluene
Xylenes
Accuracy
Correction Factor
(Matrix Spike %
Recovery)
1.18(85)"
1.06 (94)
1.06 (94)
1.16 (86)
Variability
Factor
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
10
10
10
30
< - indicates a detection limit value.
•Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor
Itiis number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
This value represents the concentration in the TCLP waste extract.
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj
6-85
-------
Table 6-2
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
Carbon Disulfide
Waste Code from
Which Universal
Standard Data
Were Transferred
Treatment Tett
fnxn Which
Performance Data*
Were Transferred
.
F001-F005
F001-F005
CoostJtaemt fro* Which
tbeCaacentratioafci
Treated Waste WM
Transferred
Cwcntratkwbi
Treated Wart*
(-I/U)
Co««tto«tfrc»WHch
the Ace»racy CorrectiM
Data Were Tnuuf em4
Carbon Disulflde ' •
Carbon Disulfide
0.90°
-
Atantty
Ctmxtkm Factor
(Matri*Sptk*%
Recotery)
VuriaWWy
Fac»tr;
-
5.34
UalnmJ
8hM
-------
Table 6-2
(Continued)
' Constituent Selected fur
Regulation
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
gamma-BHC
Chlordane
o,p'-DDD
p,p'-DDD
o,p'-DDE
Waste Code from
Which Universal
Standard Data
Were Transferred
F039, POM
F039, U129
F039, U129
FU39.UI29
F039, U129
K032, K097
F039, U060,
U061 ,
F039, U060,
U061
F039, U061
Treatment Test, from
Which Performance
Data* Were
Transferred
Constituent from Which
the Concentration in
Treated Waste Was
Transferred
Concentration in
Treated Waste
dug/kg)
CoMttoent from Whkh
the Accuracy Correction .
Data Were Transferred
Chlorinated Pesticides &
3rd 3rd Test Burn
(Test 2)
3rd 3rd Test Burn
(Test 2)
3rd 3rd Test Burn
(Test 2)
3rd 3rd Test Burn
(Test 2)
3rd 3rd Test Burn
(Test 2)
3rd 3rd Test Burn
(Test 2)
3rd 3rd Test Burn
(Test 1)
3rd 3rd Test Burn
(Test 1)
3rd 3rd Test Burn
(Test 1)
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
gamma-BHC
Chlordane
(alpha and gamma)
o,p'-DDD
p,p'-DDD
o,p'-DDE
<0.0066
<0.0066
<0.0066
<0.0066
<0.0066
<0.026
<0.013
<0.013
<0.013
Heptachlor
Heptachlor
Heptachlor
Heptachlor
Heptachlor
Chlordane
Methoxychlor
Methoxychlor
Methoxychlor
Accuracy
Correction Factor
(Matrix Spike *
;..: - .- •'::;,; •
3.57 (28)k
3.57 (28)k
3.57(28)"
3.57 (28)b
3.57 (28)"
3.57 (28)
2.38 (42)"
2.38 (42)b
2.38 (42)"
Variability
Factor
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
Unittr*
Tr«atwi«
Stand*
(n|A|
'"' •"''•"Pf
o.ot
)
0.06
0.0(6
0.0(
0.(X
0.2t
0.08
0.08
•— »«™^w™»^
0.0c
< - indicates a detection limit value.
•Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
This number represents a constituent-specific mairix spike.
'ITiis value represents the concentration in the TCLP waste extract.
NRJ-073
()629-01.nrj
6-87
-------
Table 6-2
(Continued)
Constituent Sdecled for
Regulation
Waste Code from
Which IMreruI
Standard Data
Were Traajf erred
Treatment Test tarn
\Vhkh Perfono«ac«
Data* Wen
Transferred
CowtihHfflt from Wfefch
Ike Cofflcemtntka iat
Treated Wwto WM
Tnufemd
C««ce«tr»ttotti«
TmttedWaKa
•- (.i/fci)
CMHtitMtrnMWWcli
the Aecwacy CometJo*
D*t*WereTnuKferrMl
Chlorinated P«Ucld« (ContU) J
p,p'-DDE
o,p'-DDT
p,p'-DDT
Dieldrin
Endosulfan I
Endosulfan II •
Endosulfan Sulfate
Endrin
F039, U061
F039, U061
F039, U06I
F039, P037
. F039, P050
F039, P050
F039, P050
F039, P051
3rd 3rd Test Burn
(Test 1)
3rd 3rd Test Bum
(Testl)
3rd 3rd Test Burn
(Test 1)
3rd 3rd Test Burn
(Test 2)
3rd 3rd Test Burn
(Test 2)
3rd 3rd Test Bum
(Test 2)
3rd 3rd Test Bunt
(Test 2)
3rd 3rd Test Bum
(Test 2)
p,p'-DDE
p,p'-DDT
p,p'-DDT
Dieldrin
Endosulfan I
Endosulfan II
Endosulfan sulfate
Endrin
<0.013
<0.013
<0.013
<0.013
<0.0066
<0.013
<0.013
<0.013
Methoxychlor
Methoxychlor
Methoxychlor
Heptachlor
Heptachlor
'Heptachlor
Heptachlor
Heptachlor
Accujracy
Cwnctiwi F«ctt r
(Matrix Sptk**
Reca?ery)
238 (42)k
2.38 (42)k
2.38 (42)k
3.57 (28)k
3^57 (28)k
3 J7 (28)k
357 (28)k
3^7 (28)k
VtrUbttky
Factor
: :.::
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
Unify**)
flt-ittil
<*iW
". ~ '=..';:'%
0.087
0.087
0.087
0.13
o.o«
0.13
0.13
0.13
< - indicates a detection limit value.
•Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
• This number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
This value represents the concentration in the TCLP waste extract.
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj
6-i
-------
Table 6-2
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
Endrin Aldehyde
Heptachlor
Heptachlor Epoxidc
Hexachlorobutadienc
Hexachlorocyclo-
pentadiene
Isodrin
Kepone
Meihoxychlor
Toxaphene
Waste Code from
Which Universal
Standard Data
Were Transferred
F039, P051
F039, P059,
K032, K097
F039, P059,
K032, K097
K016, KOIK,
K028, K030
K032, K033,
K034, K097
F039, P060
F039, U142
F039, U247
K041, K098
Treatment Test from
Which Performance
Data' Were
Transferred
Constituent from Which
the Concentration w
Treated Waste Wat
Transferred
Concentration in
Treated Waste
(mg/kg)
Chlorinated Pesticides (Cont'd.)
3rd 3rd Test Burn
(Test 2)
3rd 3rd Test Burn
(Test 2)
3rd 3rd Test Burn
(Test 2)
K019
3rd 3rd Test Bum
(Test 2)
3rd 3rd Test Burn
(Test 2)
K001-C
3rd 3rd Test .Buirn
(Test 2)
3rd 3rd Test Burn
(Test 2)
Endrin aldehyde
Heptachlor
Heptachlor
"V
Naphthalene
Hexachlorocyclo-
pentadiene
Isodrin
Kepone
Methoxychlor
Chlordane
(alpha and gamma)
<0.013
<0.0066
<0.0066
<2.0
<0.33
<0.0066
<2.0
<0.013
<0.26
Cowtttuent from Which
the Accuracy Correction
Heptachlor
Heptachlor
Heptachlor
Naphthalene
Hcxachlorocyclo-
pentadiene
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide
. Methoxychlor
Chlordane
(alpha and gamma)
Accuracy
Correction Factor
(Matrix Spike*
Recovery) :
3.57 (28)k
3.57 (28)k
3.57 (28)b
1 (103)
2.6 (38)
3.57 (28)"
1.33 (75)k
5.0 (20)b
3.57 (28)b
VariabOhy
.Factor'
2.8
2.8
,. 2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
Data**
Treat**
Slaadar
(mg/kf!
0.13
0.0jfc
0.06
5.6
2.4
0.06
0.13
0.18
2.6
< - indicates a detection limit value.
•Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
"Iliis number represents a consiilucnl-iipccific matrix spike.
"lliis value represents the concentration in the TCI.P waste extract.
NRJ-073
0629.-01.nrj
6-89
-------
Table 6-2
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
p-Chloro-m-cresol
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophcnol
2,6-Dichlorophcnol
2,4-
Dichlorophcnoxyacctic
Acid (2,4-D)
Pentachlorophenol
Silvex (2,4,5-TP)
2,4,5-T
2,3,4,6-Tetrachloro-
phenol
Waste Code from
Which UwTtiul
SUwtardPaU
WereTrMofemd
•
F039, U039
F039, U048
F039, U()8I
F039, U082
F039, U240
F039, K001,
U051
F039
F039
F039
Treatment Te*t
• fixwWhkk
PtrfonnanceDil**
Wen Transferred
CocurtltawlfroaWWck
tbeCoacettrafttMfe
Treated WuteW*
Truifenre*
Coaceotrttkata
Traced V?wto
(•|A|)
Cowtitrat fro« WUch
UM Aecvntey CemetiM
DaUlilVera Traufon4
Chlorinated Phenollcs and Derivatives ' :
K019
K019
K019
K019
3rd 3rd Test
Burn (Test 2)
K001-PCP
3rd 3rd Test
Burn
(Test 2)
3rd 3rd Test
Burn
(Test 2)
K001-PCP
p-Chloro-m-cresol
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
2,6-Dichlorophcnol
2,4-
Dichlorophenoxy-
acetic acid
Pentachlorophenol
»
2,4-Dichloro-
phenoxyacetic acid
2,4-Dichloro-
phenoxyacetic add
. Pentachlorophenol
<5.0
<2.0
<5.0
<5.0
02
<2.5
<0.155
<0.155
<12.5
p-CUoro-m-cresol
2-Chlorophenol
2-Chlorophenol
2-Chlorophenol
2,4-
Dichlorophenoxy-
acetic acid
Pentachlorophenol
2,4-Dichloro-
phenoxyacetic acid
2,4-Dichloro-
phenoxyacetic acid
Pentachlorophenol
Accuracy
ConrtctiMFacttr
(MiUteSfUui*
Rcctren)
„
1 (110)fc
1.02 (98)k
1.02 (98)k
1.02 (98)*
5(20)k
1.05 (95)k
5(20)k
5(20)¥
1.05 (95)"
Vwi«t«fy
FKrtW",
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
10.13
2.8
10.13
10.13
2.8
U«iT*ruJ.
StanluA.
*«W*
. 5
14
5.7
14
14
10
7.4
7.9
7.9
7.4
< - indicates a detection limit value.
•Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
This number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
This value represents the'concentration in the TCI.P waste extract.
NRJ-073
0629-01 .nrj
6-90
-------
Table 6-2
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
2,4,5-Trichlorophcnol
/2,4,6-Trichlorophcnol
Waste Code from
Which Universal
Standard Data
Were Transferred
Treatment Test
from Which
Performance Data*
Were Transferred
Constituent front Which
the Concentra&M ia
Treated Waste WM
Transferred
CoaKtatratioa ia
Treated Waste
(«g/k|)
Cottjtftaent from Which
the Accuracy Correction
Data Were Transferred
Chlorinated Phenollcs and Derivatives (Cont'd.)
F039.
RB9
K001-PCP
K001-PCP
Pentachlorophenol
Pentachlorophenol
<12.5
<12.5
Pentachlorophenol
Pentachlorophenol
• -• ' i i
Accuracy
Correction Factor
(Matrix Spike %
1.05 (95)k
1.05 (95)"
VariabttUy
Factor
2.8
2.8
United
Trwtwe
Standar
fofflfi
: '-Jf.
7.4,
7.4
< - indicates a detection limit value.
•Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
"lliis number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
Iliis value represents the concentration in the TCLP waste extract.
NRJ-073
0629-OI.nrj
6-91
-------
Table 6-2
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Refutation
Waste Code from
Which UnJ»en»l
Standard Data
WereTnuuferral
Trettaeot Test
fn>MWWch
Ptrfonaance DaU*
WereTnunsfentd
C«a*tihMBt from WUck
UteCracenlratiMifai
Treated Watte W«
Trauferred
CdMceafratkn fai
TrattedWuta
(•|A|)
C
-------
Table 6-2
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzcne
Waste Code from
Which Universal
Standard Data
Were Transferred
Treatment Test
from Which
.Performance Data*
Were Transferred
Constituent from Which
the Concentration t»
Treated Waste Was
Transferred
Concentration in
Treated Waste
(mg/kf)
Constituent from Which
the Accuracy Correction
Date Were Transferred
Chlorobenzenes (Cont'd.)
FQ39, K019,
K030,,K<)96
K019
1,2,4-
Trichlorobenzene
<5.0
1,2,4-
Trichlorobenzene
Accuracy
Correction Factor
(MatrU Spike *
Recovery)
1.33 (75)b
VarUMUty
Factor:
2.8
Uolvewaj
TmttntB*
Standanl
(»«*•)
I,^J"*'^.
; - •;•:.
19
< - indicates a detection limit value.
•Performance data consist of the concentration In treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
"Iliis number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
ITiis value represents the concentration in the 'I'l'lf waste extract.
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nrj
6-93
-------
Table 6-2
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
Waste Code from
Whkh Uttirenal
SUndard Data
Were Transferred
Treatment Test
from Whkh
Performance Data"
Were Transferred
Ccwttitoeflt fro* Wfcfcfc
tkeCMceBtratiMk
Treated Watte WM
Trawferred
Treated Waste
CoM(it»«tf from Waicfc
the Accuracy CorrectkM
Data Were TnuMferrwl
Accnracy
CftrrectiMFactwr
(Matrix SpSk* %
Rectrery)
Factor
Trwtwuntf
Halogcrated Volitlles £§ ' ^":if- ." ' ' '';":" A
Benzal Chloride
Ca/bon Tetrachloride
2-Chloro- 1,3-butadiene
Chloroethanc
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)
Methane
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
Chloroform
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)
ether
Chloromethane
K015
K021.K073
F024 .
F039
K018
F039, U024
K019
K009, K010,
K019, K029,
F025, K021,
K073
F039, U027
F039, U045 '
K019
K019
F024
K019
K019
KQ19
K019
K019
K019
K001-C
Benzal Chloride
Carbon
Tetrachloride
2-Chloro- 1,3-
butadiene
1,2-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)
methane
bis(2-
Chloroethyl)ether
Chloroform
bis(2-
Chloroisopropyl)
ether
Chloromethane
<2.0 •
. <2.0
<0.10
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0'
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
-------
»
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
3-Chloropropcne
Diclilorodifluoro-
melhanc
1,1-Dichloroclhanc
1,2-Dichloroclhant1
1,1-Dichlorpethylcne
trans- 1,2-Dichloro-
ethylene
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
trans- 1,3-
Dichloropropcne
=====
Waste Code from
Which Uni? enal
Standard Data
Were Transferred
F039
F039, U075
K018, K028
K018, K019,
K020, K029,
R)25
K029, F025
F039, U079
F039, K017,
U083
F039, U084
F039, U084
Treatment Test
from Which
Performance Data*
Were Transferred
K019
KOI 9
K019
K019
K019
K001-C
K019
K019
K019
Table 6-2
(Continued)
i
Constituent from Which
the Concentration 01
Treated Waste Wai
Transferred
Concentration in
Treated Waste
(mg/kf)
=======:
Coestitneat from Which
the Accuracy Correction
Data Were Transferred
Halogenated Volatiles (Cont'd.) :'
Hexachloroethane
Dichlorodifluoro-
methane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
trans- 1,2-Dichloro-
ethylene
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,3-
Dichloropropane
trans-1,3-
Dichloropropene
<10.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<10.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
Hexachloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1,-
Dichloroethylene
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,1-Dichloroethylene
Accuracy
Correction factor
(Matrix Spike ft
Recovery)
1 (103)
1.28 (78)k
1.06 (94)
1.06(94)
1.06(94)
1.16 (86)b
1.28 (78)k
1.28 (78)"
1.28 (78)"
VwiabiW,
Factor
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
n
2.8
"" •»..
2.8
Univen
Treatmj
Sbndii
6mtAi
30
7.2
6.0
6.0
6.0
30
18
••••••••••••••••B
18
•• !•*
18
< - indicates a detection limit value
^Performance data cbnsisi of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
Iliis number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
"ITiis value represents the concentration in the TCLP waste extract.
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nrj
6-95
-------
Table 6-2
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
Hcxachloroethanc
Hcxachloropropcnc
lodomclhanc
Melhylenc Chloride
4,4-Methylene-bis-2-
chloroaniline
Pentachloroethane
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloro-
ethane
1,1,2,2-
Tctrachlorocthane
Waste Code from
Which UatTenul
Standard Data
Were Tnuuferred
Treatment Test
from Which
Performance DaU*
Were Transferred
Coo*tittx»t from WWcfc
ItttCMKeatratiMh
Treated W«tte WM
Tnuuferred
TrwrtedWwte
tke Aecvracy CorrtctJo*
DatuWeraTnuwferred
Halogenated VoIaUlw (Cont'i)
F025, F039,
K016, K018,
K019, K028,
K030, K073,
K095, U13I
F039, U243
F039, U13S
F039, KMft,
U0«0, F()()l-
F(K»5
F039, U158
K018.K028,
K030, KTJ95,
K0%
K028, K095,
K096
K020, K028,
K095, K096
K019
K019
K001-C
K001-PCP
K001-PCP
K019
K019
K019
Hexachloroethane
Hexachloropropene
lodomethane
Methylene Chloride
4,4-MethyIene-bis-2-
chloroaniline
bis(2-Ch!oroethyl)
ether
bis(2-
Chloroethyl)ether
bis(2-
Chloroethyl)ether
<10.0
<10.0
<20
<10.0
<1
-------
Table 6-2
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
Tetrachloroethylene
/
1,1,1 -TrichloroeChane
1, 1,2-Trichloroelhanc
Trichloroethylene
Trichloromonofluoro-
methane
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
l,l,2-Trichloro-l,2,2-
trifluoroethanc
Vinyl Chloride
Waste Code from
Which Universal
Standard Data
Were Transferred
K016, K019,
K020, K028,
K030, K073,
K095, K()%
K018, KOI9,
K028, K029,
K073
F025
F001-F005,
F025, F039,
K086, U228,
K095, K096
F039, U121,
F001-F005
F039, K017
F039, F001-
F005
K029
Treatment Test
from Which
Performance Data*
Were Transferred
Constituent from WWch
ifaeConcentratHMnt
Treated Waste Was
Transferred
Concentration in
Treated Waste
(mi/W
Constituent from Whkh
(he Accuracy ConrectioM
Data Were Transferred
Halogenatcd Volatlles (Cont'd.) .
K019
KOI9
K019
K019
K001-C
K019
K019
4
K019
SSS3BKSSSSSSSSSSSS&SSX
Tetrachloroethylene
•*
1,1,1-
Trichloroethane
1,1,2-
Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Trichloromono-
fluoromethane
Hexachloroethane
Hexachloroethane
Chloroform
•— •— — ••— -^PJI
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<2.0
<10.0
<10.0
<10.0
<2.0
Tetrachloroethylene
1,1,1-
Trichloroethane
1,1,2-
Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
1,1-Dichloroethylene
Hexachloroethane
Hexachloroethane
Chloroform
mSSSS^SSSSI^SSSSSSSSSSSi
Accuracy
Correction Factor
(Matrix Spike *
Recovery) :
1.06 (94)
1.06 (94)
1.06 (94)
1 (107)"
U6(86)k
1 (103)
1 (103)
1.06 (94)
Variability
Factor
2.8
2.8
2.8
.a,™
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
Uoivonal
Tremtenot
Suundanl
(mt/kc) ;
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
30
30
30 .
"i — - .-
6.0
< - indicates a detection limit value.
•Performance dala consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
This number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
"Iliis value represents the concentration in the TC1.P waste extract.
NRJ-073
(ir,2!)-01.nrj
6-97
-------
Table 6-2
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
Waste Code from
Whkh Uurmd
Standard Data
.Were Transferred
Treatment Test
from Whkh
Performance Data*
Were Transferred
CoadStaent from Which
theCoeceatittkmk
Treated Watte W«
Trawferrtd
CdMceatratkn fa
Treated Waste
C«f/ki)
CowtffeMrt fro« Which
the Aecwacy CorrectkM
Data Were Transferred
Accuracy
CorrattM Fatter
. (MKrhSpflte*
v Recarery)
VariabOiDr
Factor
Uaherul
Tre*t»«a4 •
Sta^itant
0««*l) :
Noncblotiiuted Pbenollcs ' ' :|j • .
Cresol (m- and p-)
o-Cresol
2,4-Dimclhylphenol
4,6-Dinilro-o-cresol
Dinoscb (2-sec-Butyl-
4,6-dinitrophenol)
2,4-Dinitrophenol
(o)2-Nitrophenol
(p)4-Nitrophenol
Phenol
F039, U052,
F001-F005
R)39, U052,
F001-RW5
F039, U101
FU39, P047
F039, P020
• F039, P048
K102
F039, U170
F039, U188,
K083
K019
K019
K019
K019
3rd 3rd Test
Burn
KOI9
K102
K019
K019
Cresol (m- and p-)
o-Cresol
2,4-Dimethylphenol
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
Dinoseb
2,4-Dinitrophenol
. (o)2-Nitrophenol
(p)4-Nitrophenol
Phen61 *
<2.0
<2.0
<5.0
<50
<0.36
<50
• <1.0
<10.0
<2.0
p-Chloro-m-crcsol
p-Chloro-m-crcsol
p-Chloro-m-cresol
Phenol
Dinoseb
Phenol
(p)4-Nitrophenol
(p)4-Nitrophenol
Phenol
1 (110)k
1 (110)k
1 (110)b
1.11 (90)"
2.44 (41)k
1.11 (90)k
4.76(21)"
1.03 (97)k
1.11 (90)k
2.8
2.8
18
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
5.6
5.6
14
160
25
160
13
29
6.2
< - indicates a detection limit value.
'Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
This number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
This value represents the. concentration in the TCLP waste extract.
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj
6-98
-------
Table 6-2
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
'
Bromodichloromeihane
, Bromoform
Bromomcthanc
4-Bromophcnyl phcnyl
ether
Chlorodibromomelhanc
l,2-Dibromo-3-
chloropropane
Dibroniomethane
tris-(2,3-Dibrom6propyl)
phosphate
Ethylene Dibromide
— — — -«n_^_ _«»_^_
Waste Code from
Which Universal
Standard Data
Were Transferred
P039
RJ39, U225
F039, U029,
K117.K118,
K131, K132,
K136
F039, U030
F039
F039, U066
F039, U068
U235
F039.U067,
K117, K118,
K136
Treatment Test from
Which Performance
Data* Were
Transferred
Constituent from Which
the Concentration in
Treated Waste Was
Transferred
======:
Concentration in
Treated Waste
(ntg/k|)
========
Constituent from Which
the Accuracy Correction
Data Were Transferred
Organo-Brominea -•'•
EDB Test Burn
EDB Test Burn
EDB Test Burn
EDB Test Burn
EDB Test Burn
EDB Test Burn
EDB Test Burn
K037
EDB Test Burn
Ethylene Dibromide
Ethylene Dibromide
Ethyiene Dibromide
Ethylene Dibromide
Ethylene Dibromide
Ethylene Dibromide
Ethylene Dibromide
Disulfoton
Ethylene Dibromide
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<0.034
<5.0
Ethylene Dibromide
Ethylene Dibromide
Ethylene Dibromide
Ethylene Dibromide
Ethylene Dibromide
Ethylene Dibromide
Ethylene Dibromide
Disulfoton
Ethylene Dibromide
Accuracy
Correction Factor
(Matrix Spike %
Recqveijr)
1.08 (93)"
1.08 (93)k
1.08 (93)k
1.08 (93)k
1.08 (93)b -
1.08(93)'' v
1.08 (93)k
1.10 (91)k
1.08 (93)k
VariabOtty
Factor
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
~~ 2.8
••"•••wawianaa
2.8
i
2.8
2.8
^-"•^^•••••••••^•B
2.8
IMfc
Tww
«toM
(tagj
LrSfr
15
15
i,' *
15
, . vrijr»,
15
15 =
—~~~f^+
15
••«•—•.•.
15
0.
•HHIMBHMIBH.
15
< - indicates a detection limit value.
•Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
'This number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
"This value represents the concentration in the TCLP waste extract.
NIU-073
W)29-Ol.nrj
6-99
-------
Table 6-2
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
Watte Cod* from
Which Uaivenal
SUmdard Data
Were Transferred
'Treatment Test
from Which
Performance Data*
Were Tnuufemd
Content front Which
UMCoaceatrattalfai
Traded Waste Wu
Tnuufemd
CwKMtrttkwoi
Trattcd Waste
(0^kj)
CMctttM^rrawWkktii
tk« Acouracy Corndkat .
D*(a Were Tru«f«ro4
Accuracy
Correction
Factor
(Matrix Sp8u»»
Recotwry)
VaiUbflity
Factw
Organo-Nltrogen Compounds 4 '..:•]•"'"'
Acetonilrilc
/
2-Acclylaminofluorcne
Acrylamidc
Acrylonitrile .
Aniline
p-Chloroaniline
1,4-Dinitrobenzene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Di-n-propylnittosamine
K011, K013,
K014
P039, U005
K011, K013,
KOI 4
F039, U009
F039, U012
KQ83
F039, P024
F039
F039, U105,
Kill
F039, U106,
Kill
F039, Ulll
K011, K013,
K014-
K001-PCP
K011, K013,
K014
K102
K019
K019
K001-PCP
3rd 3rd Test
Bum (Test 1)
K019
K019
K019
Acetonitrile
2-
Acetylaminofluorene
Acrylamide
Acrylonitrile
Aniline
Aniline
p-Chloroaniline
1,4-Dinitrobenzene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Di-n-
propybitrosamine
<0^
<50
<6J
<30
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<03375
<50
<10.0
<5.0
Acetonilrile
Acenaphthene
Acrylamide
1,1-Dichloroethylene
4-Nitrophenol
Nitrobenzene
4-Nitrophenol •
Dinoseb
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Di-n-
propylnitrosamine
1.27 (79)k
• 1(120)"
1.27 (79)k
1 (126)b
1.03 (97)k
1(103)
1.11 (90)"
2.44 (41)k
l(107)k
1 (107)k
1 (120)"
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
*'.'
IWTWWlj
TritfMM|
<»iw-;
' ' i
'V
1^ ',
140
23
84
14
16
23
140
28.
14
< - indicates a detection limit value.
'Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
This number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
'lliis value represents the concentration in the TC1.P waste extract.
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj
6-100
-------
Table 6-2
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
Diphenylamine and
Diphenylnitrosamine
Methacrylonilrilc
Methapyrilcne
(o)2-Nitroaniline
(p)4-Nilroaniline
Nitrobenzene
5-Nitro-o-toluidine
N-Nitroso-di-n-
butylamine
N-Nitrosodiriiethylamine
Waste Code from
Whkh Unirersal
Standard Data
Were Transferred
K022
F039, UI52
F039, UI55
KI01
F039, P077
F039, K086,
U169, F001-
F005
K083
F039, U181
F039, U172
F039
Treatment Test
from Whkh
Performance Data*
Were Transferred
Constituent from Which
the Concentration in
Treated Waste Wai
Transferred
Concentration in
Treated Waste
(mg/kf)
Cwwtituent from Which
the Accuracy Correction
Data Were Transferred
Organo-Nitrogctt Compounds (Cont'd.) !*
K022
K102
3rd 3rd Test
Burn
(Test 2)
K101
K019
K019
K019
K001-PCP
K001-PCP
3rd 3rd Test
Burn (Test 1)
Diphenylamine and
Diphenylnitrosamine
Melhacrylonitrile
Methapyrilene
(o)2-Nitroaniline
(p)4-Nitroaniline
Nitrobenzene
Nitrobenzene
5-Nitro-o-toluidine
N-Nitroso-di-n-
butylamine
N-Nitrosomethyl-
ethylamine
<3.,
<30
<0.36
<2.0
<10.0
<5.0
<5.0
<10.0
<5.0
<0.3375
. Diphenylamine and
Diphenylnitrosamine
1,1-Dichloroethylene
Pronamide
(o)2<-Nitroaniline
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
4-Nitrophenol
Nitrobenzene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Di-n-
propylnitrosamine
Dinoseb
Accuracy
Correction
Factor
(Matrix Spike %
Recovery)
1.54 (65)
1 (126)"
1.45 (69)"
2.5 (40)
1 (107)b
1.03 (97)k
1 (103)
1 (120)"
1.23(81)"
2.44
Variability
Factor
2.8
2.8
,2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
Standard
•;•-,•;•"•: if
, ; ii
13
(sum)
84
1.5
14
28
14
28
17
2.3
< - indicates a detection limit value.
•Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
"Tliis number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike. . • '
"ITiis value represents the concentration in the TCLP waste extract. l
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj
6-101
-------
Table 6-2
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
N-Nitrosomethyl-
elhyfamine
N-Nitrosomorpholinc
N-Nitrosopipcridinc
N-Nilrosopyrrolidine
N-Nitrosodielhylamine
Phenacetin
Pronamide
Propanenitrile (Ethyl
Cyanide)
Pyridine
Waste Code from
Whkh Uahenal
Standard Data
Were Transferred
Treatment Test
from Which
Performance Data*
Were Transferred
Cwtiteeol fitM WUck
UmCoacent ratio* to
Treated Watte WH
Transferred
C
D«U Were Traadtemd
;i.. •• i
Dinoseb
Dinoseb
Di-n-
propylnitrosamine
Di-n-
propylnitrosamine
Di-n-
propylnitrosamine
4-Nitrophenol
Pronamide
1,1-DichIoroethylene
Benzene
Accuracy
Cwnctkw
Factor
(Matrix Spike*
Recovery)
2.44
2.44
1.23 (81)b
1.23 (81)b
1 (120)b
1.11 (90)"
1.45 (69)"
1.28 (78)k
1.14 (88)k
VariabflHy
Factw
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
IMTWWl
Tna(«««it|
taHMvl
'''xK'l'ii
23 |!
i-.
23
35
. 35
28
16
15
360
16
< - indicates a detection limit value.
•Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
This number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
This value represents the concentration in the TCLP waste extract.
NRJ-073
0629-8J.nrj
6-102
-------
Table 6-2
(Continued)
Coastitueiit Selected for
Regulation
Disulfoton
r Famphur
Methyl Parathion
Parathion
Phorati:
SSSSSSM ui ,^,
Waste Code from
Whkh Universal
Standard Data
Were Transferred
F039
F039
F039
F039
FU39
=====
Treatment Test
from Which
Performance Data*
Were Transferred
Constituent from Which
the Concentration fat
Treated Waste Wa*
Transferred
Concentratioa in
Treated Waste
(rag/kg)
Conjtffeent from Whkh
the Accuracy Correction:
Data Were Transferred
Organo-Sulfur Pesticides •'
Leachate Data
Leachate Data
Leachate Data
Leachate Data
Leachate Data
Disulfoton
Famphur
Methyl Parathion-
Parathion
Phorate
<2.0
<5.0
<1.5
<1.5
<1.5
Disulfoton
Famphur
Parathion
Parathion
Phorate
Accuracy
Correction Factor
(Matrix Spike*
1.09
1.09
1.09
1.09
1.09
Variability
Factor
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
iwi
Tre«
St*|
Nil
'• ••-'•.•! iff
•• •; ;f
6
15
4
4
4
•--•••-'— »*•
< • indicates a detection limit value.
'Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
"This number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
'Fbis value represents the concentration in the TCLI' waste extract.
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj
6-103
-------
Table 6-2
(Continued)
i _...|___ —— _Bimlu___ • '*^^^^_.._ T-*™^
Constituent Selected for
Acelonc
Acclophcnonc
n-Butanol
2-Chloronaphthalcne
Cyclohexanone
1 4-Dioxane
Ethyl acetate
Ethyl ether
Ethyl methacrylate
Isobutanol
Waste Code from
Wfakh Universal
Standard Data
Were Transferred
F039, K086,
U002, F001-
F005
F039, U004,
K086
F039, K086,
1)031, FOfll-
F005
F039, U047
F001-F005
F039, U108
F039, K086,
U112, F001-
F005
F039, U117,
F001-F005
F039, U118
F039, U140,
F001-F005
-_"_ - --•• -L1- - . ..-• .meag
Treatment Test
from Which
Performance Data*
Were Transferred
SVi .m,-T- 'nriilniHIII' lilWJ gBBMMMM^M^
CoBJlituent from WUcfc
tbeConcentrttiwtfai
Treated Waste Vf«i
Tnwiferrtd
•••MUMaaaBaBBV
Coacemlritkmia
Treated Waste
(•fries)
Oxygenated Hydrocarbons
K001-C
K102
3rd 3rd Test
Burn
(Test 1)
K019
F001-F005
K102
K001-C .
K001-PCP
K001-C
K102
Acetone
Acetophenone
n-Butanol
2-Chloronaphthalcne
Methyl ethyl ketone
1,4-Dioxane
Ethyl acetate
Ethyl ether
Ethyl methacrylate
Isobutanol
<50
<2.0
<0.4
<2.0
0.14°
<60
<10.0
<50
<50
<60
ssmm^mmmmasmmmmm^m
Co«tirt«»trro«Wfcfc«
tbe Accuracy Correction
Date Were TnMfen«4
1,1-Dichloroethylcne
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Methyl Isobutyl
Ketone
Acenaphthene
•
Benzene
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1,1-Dichloroethylene
Acenncjr
Correctkw Factor
(MMrbSptta*
RtcoTerj)
1.16 (86)fc
1.72 (58)fc
2.33 (43)k
1 (110)v
-
1 (104)b
1.16 (86)"
1.16 (86)k
1.16 (86)fc
1 (126)fc
VarUWWy
Factor',''
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
5.34
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
IMTtrul
1n***k
fiUMd*f4-
(«l^)
160
9.7
2.6
5.6
0.75*
170
33
160
160
170
- indicates a detection limit value.
< - indicates a detection limit vaiue. .
•Performance data consist of. the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
This number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
•This value represents the concentration in the TCLP waste extract.
NRJ-073
0629-01 .nrj
6-104
-------
Table 6-2
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
Isosafrole
Methanol
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methyl isobutyl ketone
Methyl methacrylate
Safrole
a""mtr—*'~ -TT-^L
Waste Code from
Which Universal
Standard Data
Were Transferred
F039, U141
F001-F005
F039, K086,
U159, F001-
F005
F039, K08(),
U161.F001-
F005
F039, U162
F039, U203
Treatment Test
from Which
Performance Data'
Were Transferred
3rd 3rd Test
Burn
(Test 1)
FQ01-F005
K019
K001-PCP
K001-C
K102
==============
Constituent from Which
the Concentration k
Treated Waste Wai
Transferred
=============
Concentration in
Treated Waste
(mg/kg)
================
Constituent from Which
the Accuracy Correction
Date Were Transferred
Oxygenated Hydrocarbons (Cont'd.) If
Isosafrole
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methyl isobutyl
ketone
Methyl methacrylate
Safrole
<0.36
0.14°
<10.0
<10.0
<50
<5.0
ttHBBEGEs&ascssasaG
Isosafrole
.
1,1-Dichloroethylene
Trichloroethylene
1,1-Dichloroethylene
p-Chloro-m-cresol
i BaSaaagsaaSaaSaaBMB
==================
Accuracy
Correction Factor
(M.trUSpik**
Recovery)
2.56 (39)b
1.28 (78)k
1.19 (84)k
1.16 (86)b
1.56(64)k_
Factor
2.8
5.34
* 2.8
2.8
28
2.8
^SSSSSSNtSSSSSSSSt
Umverul
TreataeiK
2.6
075*
36
'"' ,"*
33
22
< - indicates a detection limit value.
^Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor
I nis number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike,
This value represents the concentration in the TCI.P wa«|e extract. '
NRJ-073
Of>29-0l.nrj
6-105
-------
Table 6-2
(Continued)
Coastiluent Selected for
Regulation
Waste Code from
Wfakh IM»ers«l
Standard DaU
Were Tnussfemd
Trettmoat Test
froaWhidi
Performance Data*
WereTnuasfeired
CooUiUieat from WUch
OwCooctatnttiMi*
Treated WwleWn
Transferred
Tre*(ed Waste
CMwtttMrt from Wucfc
tiu Accturacy Coittctfaw
PCB» »nd Diorins | :;|
Aroclor 1016
/roclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
Aroclot 1242
Aroclor 1248 "
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
Hexachlorodiberizo- •
furans
Hexachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxins
F039, K085
F039, K085
I
F039, K085
F039, K085
F039, K085
F039, K085
F039, K085
F039
F039
3rd 3rd Test
Bum (Test 2)
3rd 3rd Test
Burn (Test 2)
3rd 3rd Test
Burn (Test 2)
3rd 3rd Test
Bum (Test 2)
3rd 3rd Test
Burn (Test 2)
3rd 3rd Test
Bum (Test 2)
3rd 3rd Test
Burn (Test 2)
Dioxins Rule
Dioxins Rule
Methoxychlor
Methoxychlor
Methoxychlor
Methoxychlor
Methoxychlor
Methoxychlor
Methoxychlor
-
"
<0.065
<0.065
<0.065
<0.065
<0.065
<0.13
<0.13
<0.001
<0.001
Methoxychlor
Methoxychlor
Methoxychlor
Methoxychlor
Methoxychlor
Methoxychlor
Methoxychlor
-
-
Accuracy
': Ctrrectta Foctor
Ree*rery)
*«»
a
B";- ;i-;;-:C'; •".^•>>-:fe!
5(20)«
5(20)'
5(20)°
5(20)°
5 (20)°
5 (20)°
5(20)°
_
2J8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
-
- .
0.92*
0.92*
0.92*
0.92*
0.92*
1.8*
1.8*
0.001
0.001
< - indicates a detection limit value.
•Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
This number represents a constituent specific matrix spike. . .
This value represents the concentration in the TCLP waste extract.
The treatment standards shown for Aroclors 1016,1221,1232,1242,1248,1254, and 1260 are not universal treatment standards. As discussed in Section 3.2.1, the Agency is promulgating a single treatment standard
for total PCBs in non waste waters. The universal treatment standard for total PCBs was developed by lumming the treatment standards originally calculated for the individual Aroclors shown above. The treatment
performance data for these Aroclors are presented here for completeness.
NW-073
0629-01 .nrj
6-106
-------
Table 6-2
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
Penlachlorodibenzo-
furans
Pentachlorodibcnxo-p-
dioxins
Tetrachlorodiben/o-
furans
Tetrachlorodibcwo-p-
dioxins
Total PCBs
1 !l =g=*«gg»«~-— 1 — —
•g
Waste Code from .
Which Universal
Standard Data
Were Transferred
F039
F039
F039
F<)3<>
,
— —
Treatment Teft
from Which
Performance Data*
Were Transferred
Dioxins Rule
Dioxins Rule
Dioxins Rule
Dioxins Rule
=====0=
'===== i i =a
Constituent from Wkkk
the Concentration to
Treated Watte WM
Transferred
=================
Concentration ill
Treated Waste
(mg/ki)
PCBs and Dioxins (Cont'd.)
-
.
-
-
===============OHSBBS==
< 0.001
< 0.001
<0.001
<0.001
!gB^™^"
====ss=========
Constituent from Wait*
toe Accuracy Correction
Data Were Transferred
-;-?'-.. _ :'<:'
-
- .
-
-
^==ggMg"Bgg^***' ii
==================
Accuracy
Correction Factor
CMatrb Spike*
Recovery)
-
-
-
-
«======
============
VariabUiiy
Factor
-
-
-
-
======59903==
m
Uai,«w»
Tmtaiwd
Stattdanl
tac/kc)
"••'*•?.
i-
0.00|
0.001
0.001
0.001
10
< - indicates a detection limit value.
•Performance daia consist of the concentration in treaied wwte, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor
I nis number represents a constituent specific matrix spike.
'ITiis value represents the concentration in the TC1.P waste extract.
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj
6-107
-------
Table 6-2
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
Waste Code from
Which Universal
Standard Data
Were Traaif erred
Treatment Test
from Which
Performance Data*
Were Transferred
Cottititueut from Wkkk
the Concern tratkmh
Treated Waste Wa*
Tnuuf erred
CoKeotrattai In
Treated Waste
C
-------
Table 6-2
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for
Regulation
Accnaphthalcnc
II Accnaphlhene
Anlhraccnc
Bcn/(a)anlhraccnc
Ben7.o(a)pyrcnc
Bcnzo(b)fluoranthenc
and
Bcnzo(k)nuoranthcne
Benzo(g,h,i)pcrylene
Chrysene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Indcno(l,2,3-c,d)pyrene
3-Mc(hylcholanthrene
Waste Code from
Which Universal
Standard Data
Were Transferred
F039, K087
K035
KOI 5, K035
K035
K035, KOMI
F039
F039
K035, K087
F039, U063
K035, K087
K035
K035, K087
F039, UI57
Treatment Test
from Which
Performance Data*
Were Transferred
Constituent from WWch tin
Concentration in Treated
Waste Was Tnuuferred
Concentration m
Treated Waste
(mg/kg)
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
K087
K087
K087
K087
K087
K087
F024
K087
K087
K087
K087
K087
K001-PCP
Acenaphthalene
Fluorene
Anthracene
Benz(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
and
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Chrysene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Indeno(l,2,3-c,d)pyrene
3-Methykholanthrene
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0 + <1.0
= <2.0
<0.336
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0
<1.0 .
<5.0
- ; ;:;;:
CoustihMBt f rom WhJki
the Accumcy Correctidi
Data Were Trusfemd
::1,. •':• :l:lll
Acenaphthalene
Fluorene
Anthracene
Benz(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
and
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Chrysene
Pyrene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Indeno(l,2,3-
c,d)pyrene
Pyrene
Accuracy :
Correctkia
iWar:^--..
(MatmSjpJk**
R«co»erj')i •
1.22 (82)
1.22 (82)
1.22 (82)
1.22 (82)
1.22 (82)
1.22 (82)
1.61 (62)
1.22 (82)
2.94 (34)"
1.22 (82)
1.22 (82)
1.22(82)
1.04 (96)b
Variabim?
Factor
2.8
2.8
2.8
2,8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
—••M-HMWBIMM*
2.8
••' i ••••••••^
2.8
1-1 iiiiimaa.
2.8
2.8
^••^^ ..
W4w
Trttfa
i**i
(mtf>
L....^y,
3.'
3.'
3.t
3>
3>
6.{
(sun
1^
34
8.2
••^•••••MHM
3.4
•MMMH.^
3.4
3.4
•^'•'•1 !••
15
••• • indicates a detection limit value.
•Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor
I his number represents a constituent specific matrix spike.
''Ihis value represents the concentration in the TCI.P waste extract. •
NRJ-073
IKi2'M)|.nrj
6-109
-------
Table 6-2
(Continued)
Guutitumt .Selected Tor
Regulation
Wwte Codt ttom
Which Uflhenal
Standard D*ta
Were Transferred
Treatment feet
from Which
Performance Data*
Were Transferred
CoostitM* from WWci (he
CoMortratktt k Treated
WtsteWuTrMtfemd
CtwedtrttkM k
Treated Wake
(«|A|)
CwutibMut from VTWdi
Ike Accuracy Ortectktt
Data Were TranTamA
Ace w My
.CcmctiM
Fact*r
...'iJ
5.6
5.6
82
< - indicates a detection limit value.
'Performance data consist of the concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
''ITiis number represents a constituent specific matrix spike.
'ITiis value represents the concentration in the TCI.P waste extract.
NRJ-073
OM'MM.nrj
6-110
-------
Table 6-3
Determination of Universal Treatment Standards for Metal Constituents (Nonwastewaters)
• ======
Constituent Selected
for Regulation
'
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
(total)
..
Waste Code from
Which the
Universal
Standard Data
Were Transferred
K061
D(M)4
K06I
K061
K061
1
===========
Treatment Test from
Which the
Performance Data*
Were Transferred
========C========— =0,-—
Constituent from Which &>
Concentration in Treated
Waste Was Tnujsferwd
'' i ' 1. 1 ii,-
Awrage
Concentration fa
Treated Wast*
Contitoent from
Witch a*
ACSWUCT Correction
Transferred
Metal Constituents
K061-HRD
.
K06I-SKF.IMS1
K06MNMETCO,
IMS'
K061-HRD
D007-Cyanokem
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
0.655
-
2.51
0.0073
. <0.060
. 0.16
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Accuracy
Cametic*
, Factor
(MjUri, Spike *
Recovery)
1.09 (92)k
•
1.08 (93)k
l(100)k
1.15 (87)k
l(105)k
VartibHJty
factor
2.9
2.8
1.9
2.8
5.4
fiut/L) !':
2.1
5.0
7.6
0.014
0.19
-
0.86
< - indicates a detection limit value.
1 No matrix spike data were available for these data.
Matrix spike data were transferred from the IMS test.
^Performance data consists of concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor
Inis number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
?D»,"-nerCUry Subcale6°r>r wastcs ' Mercury »astcs with mercury concentrations less than
KMl-.RX. = Mercury recovery by roasting/retorting.
NR.MI73
0629-Ol.nrj
6-111
HRD - Horsehead Resource Development Co. HTMR data
SKF - SKF Plasma Technologies HTMR data
IMS . International Mill Service HTMR data
INMETCO - International Metals Reclamation Company HTMR data
-------
Table 6-3
(Continued)
•
Constituent Selected
for Regulation
Waste Code from
Whkh the
Umyenal
Standard Data
Were Transferred
Treatment Test from
Whkh the
Performance Data*
Were Trauifemd
CoavtitMat ft*m WUdi la*
Ceac«atrado« hi Treated
Watte Was Traosferred
Average
' C«x'mltmn ta
Traced Wade .
to/I*)
Metal Constituents (Cont'd.)
Lead
Mercury
K061
K106, U151,
P065, and
metcray". RMHRC"
K071, F039,
K106, and
U151 (Low
mercury*. mn-RMERC4
DAJ1C
ictiduo), rUOj
and P092 j
IWrmal
, Tireafiiielai;. -:-"'i
, 8taa4af4 •:.;/:'
V»I/W ^^i
.
L32 (76)k
1.05(95)
2.8
5.47
037
O^o^^wr
RMERC'mUiM)
0.025 (u»
~*"T •urir'
mtfm)
< - indicates a detection limit value.
1 - No matrix .spike data were available for these data.
Matrix spike data were transferred from the IMS test.
'Performance data consists of concentration in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor.
"ITiis number represents a constituent-specific matrix spike.
M.ow-mercury subcategory wastes = Mercury wastes with mercury concentrations less than 260 mg/kg.
'RMF.RC = Mercury recovery by roasting/retorting.
HRD - Horsehead Resource Development Co. HTMR data
SKF - SKF Plasma Technologies irrMR data
IMS - International Mill Service HTMR data
1NMEFCO - International Metals Reclamation Company HTMR data
NR.I-073
()f,29-()l.nrj
6-112
-------
'"
Constituent Selected
far Regulation
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
.
Waste Code from
Which the
Universal
Standard Data
Were Transferred
KUOI
K()6I
K(K>I
K()f>l
'K()6I
KOfil
'" 1 IN
Treatment Test front
Which the
Performance Data*.
Were Transferred
K06MNMETCO,
IMS' •
KOfil -SKF.IMS'
K061-HRD
K06MNMETCO,
IMS'
.K061-IMS
K061-IMS
""'' ," '"''" ' •-•••mi t ,-•—
Tal
(Cor
•••"
Ceostitoeot from Whkh the
Concentration in Treated
Waste Was Transferred
lie 6-3
itinued)
=======:
Average
CoMcefttratioafa
Treated Waste
(«ng/L)
Coiltitoent from
WWch Uw
Accnracy CorreetJoii
Data Were
Transferred
Metal Constituents (Cont'd.) •
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
*•
Vanadium
Zinc
in
2.54
<0.05
<0.080
<0.024
0.0944
0.602
-^**™*f™**^"T^^^geg?'!'^"'*"'™™
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
sssssafassssss i INI i
Accwacjr
Correction
Factor
(Matrix S^ike*
Retotrery)
1.05 (95)k
1.11 (90)k
132 (76)k
1.16(86)'
1.02 (98)fc
1.02 (98)b
Variability
Factor
1.9
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.4
8.6
tlttiverwl s'
ttDttteaat 4
Stawhitl r'
(•g/n :'
L,. ^r*^,- -,
5.0
0.16
030
0.078-
0.23
53
< - indicates a detection limit value.
' • No matrix spike data were available for these data.
Matrix spike data were transferred from the IMS test.
•Performance dala consisis of conccniralion in treated waste, accuracy correction factor, and variability factor
I his number represents a conslituenl-sperific matrix spike.
'ILow-mercury subcategory wasles = Mercury wasles with mercury concentrations less than
RMhRC = Mercury recovery by roasling/relorling.
NRJ-073
%2'>-Ol.nrj
6-113
HRD - Horsehead Resource Development Co. HTMR data
SKF - SKF Plasma Technologies HTMR data
IMS - International Mill Service HTMR data
INMETCO - International Metals Reclamation Company HTMR data
-------
Table 6-4
Characterization Data and Treatment Performance Data for HTMR for Certain Metal-Bearing Wastes
BOAT IJM
ConrtUiMnt
Antimony
Rnrium
/
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Lead
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
Untreated FOOti.KOtil.
uid K062 (HTMR)1
Valued) Va!iw<«)
ToUl TCI.P
(mn/M) (UK/))
<6-31 <0.06
<0.01- 0.04-1.41
690
-
<2- <0.005-
17.900 17.1
1.500-
<3-39l
3.S-28S
•
Vak»<»
t*ul
(^/lt)
<20
i
0,000
-
<10-
500
w«t*!
tctfi*
1 &J
u
-
<0.005
2,000- 0.013
12,000
50- '
1,500
200-
1,000
-
<0.05
0.22
<0.05
i 0.014
t
i
-
-
-
u lubmillcd la EPA (Oclober 1991).
'Source: Koraereol Roource tkwkipnEill Cotnputy (HRD), ditt lubrnilled to EPA In Srytcmbrr 1990.
'Source: Omile Enfinecrint Report Tor Honerrad Resource Development Company for KMI (dlt» flan weU-oe«ltntd md weU-otentd praceMM), Much 29. 1988.
'Source: SKF Pturm Technokijie«, data luhmitln) to EPA In the Pint Third ralctmkinf.
NRJ-071
0718-01 nrj
6-114
-------
Table 6-4 (Continued)
-No data.
•Sou,*: lrtenwion.1 Mill Sendee (MS), feu .uMua! to EPA fo, .he p^poM nJe fo, KMI (hl^, .b eta
ei hicnwiM.1 McuU Rwtumiion Comply (INMETCO). d.ui wbnuiiol 10 EPA fo, ih, pnpwd nil. fa K06I (U|h ihx, «*c.u,
NRJ-071
0718-Ol.nrj
6-115
-------
Table 6-5
Characterization Data and Treatment Performance Data for Stabilization for Certain Metal-Bearing Wastes
•
BPATU*
Con*Uowtf
=====
Antimony
B«rium /
Beryllium
Ctdmium
Chromium
Lead
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Itanium
Vuudium
Zinc
— — — !•— —
Untn*l«d K06I
(SUbttaUloo)1
:
Valu. ! Valued)
Total ! TCIP
(mi/kg) ; (mg/1)
!
(a>I/k|) i (««n)
i
!
Tool
(«!'!<*>
i
:
|
•
256-
661
1.100-
1.640
9.240-
38.000
118-
163
-
34.9
'
.
_'
V«Iu*(i)
TCLP
(•1/D
-
-
-
0.01-
7.15
0.060-
0.580
5.51-
334
0.01-
0.12
-
<0.01
-
1
I
!
TmtWKMl
(SliUUntlM/
V«h* ' V«M»)
Toul TCLF
(mt/kj) j tjjgfl}
t
- i •
-
-
• •
i
-
-
-
• .
-
-
-
(^« :
0.0*1-0.11
0.34-4.62
<0.002
<0.004
123-163 ! <0.003-
1 0.19
116-302
245-397
<0.1
0.006-0.3
<0.042-
0.84
<0.002-
0.006
1.42-3.49 i <0.006
<0.21-
0.46
<0.004
14.7-36.3 ' <0.008
18.5-120 : 0.041-
! 0.65
IMrMtoOTOW
(9UMBtrfU||)f
V«tu. i
T«Ul
<^k|)
V«k«
TCIJP
(*tO)
"-
0.74-
85.5
-
1.3-720
0.04-1.41
-
0.01-23.6
12.9- ! 0.01-360
42.900
11.4-
24,500
37-
23.700
-
2.3-39
-
0.26-50.2
0.52-730
<0.01-
<0.45
• <0.01-
1.64
-
i
— : — j :
120- : 0.16-
90.200 j 2.030
TrHMFH< 1
(SUkOutltelf
v*w ! v«M4
T*Ml TCIP
(**rt|> ' ("^MI II
I
1
I
' 7
-
-
0.04- R
1.18
<0.01- 1
3.23 1
- ! 0.03-
! 1.21
-
-
-
-
-
0.20-
2.39
0.02-
16.5
<0.01-
0.20
! <0.01-
0.2
-
II
wdndo.
- No d»u.
'Source: Convenioa Syilcm. tnoorponla),
-------
Table 6-5 (Continued)
BOAT Llrt
CoMtltiwat
Antimony
Biriiun
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Selenium
Silver
Trullium
Vuadium
Zinc
UotrMted K061
V«lue<»)
Total (mg/kg)
294
238
0.15
481
1.370
20.300
243
<5.0
59
25
244,000
V*bw(i)
TCLPdm/i)
0.04
0.733
< 0.001
12.8
< 0.007
45.1
0.027
-------
Table 6-6
Comparison of Treatment Performance Data for Solvent Extraction of K048, K049, K050, K051, and K052 Wastes
with Universal Standards .
Constituent
Regulated in
K0484C052, F037,
• and/or F038
Anthracene
Benzene
Benz(a)anthraccne
Benzo(a)pyrene
Chrysene
o-Cresol •"
p-Cresol
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Ethylbenzene
bis-(2-EthylhexyI)
phthalate
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Universal
Standard
(mg/kg)
3.4
°10
3.4
3.4
3.4
5.6
5.6
28
10
28
« f.
J.O
5.6
Treatment
Standard in
K048-K052, F037,
and/or F038
(mg/kg)
28
14
20
12
15
6.2
6.2
3.6
14
7.3
41
4Z
34
Concentration in Treated
' Waste from Plant Q
(mg/kg)
<0.33, <0.33, <0.33, <033
0.22, 0.09, 0.13, 0.1
<0.33, <033, <033, <033
<0.33, <033, <033, <033
0.42, <033, <033, <033
<033, <033, <033, <033
2.6, 1.9, 23, 1.1
<033, <033, <033, <033
0.06, <0.05, <0.05, <0.05
<033, <033, <033, <033
0 1R ^fl 1ft <:ft ftft *-fl "\\
0.46, 0.4, <033, 0.35
Concentration In Treated
. Wastes from Plant R "
(mg/kg) •
15, <13, 7.8, 7.6
<0.65, <5.0T, <1.0, 140
4.7, 1.8, 25.0, 24.0
: ': ::'.' •"
Concentttltion In Treated Wastes from Plant T
(mg/kg)
-, 10.01, -, 18.0, 14.0, 10.2, 13.0, 13.0, -, -, -, -
0.29, 0.05, 0.06, 0.09, -, -, -, -, <0.1, <0.1, <2.0, <0.1
NO DATA
NO DATA
•» "» "» 0.28, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -
NO DATA
NO DATA
0.25, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -
-, 0.06, 13.0, -, <0.1, -, <0.1, -, <0.1, 13.0, <0.1, <0.1
0.25, -,-, 1.12, -,-,-,-,-,-,-,-
n^-01 <028 02
0.38, 12.0, 0.16, 0.26, 9.6, -, 2.6, -, <1.0, -, -, <0.2
< - Indicates a detection limit value
•Treatment performance data used to develop K048-K052, F037, F038 treatment standard.
NRJ-073
()629-(Il.nrj
6-118
-------
Table 6-6
*
(Continued)
'•
Constituent
Regulated in
K048-K052, F037,
and/or F038
Phenol
Pyrcnc
Toluene
Xylcnes (total)
i
.
Universal
Standard
(mg/kg)
6.2
8.2
10
33
— 'in • •./ ' *SSI
Treatment
Standard In
K048-K052, F037,
and/or F038
(mg/kg)
3.6
. 36
14
22
'"" -•yss^sssssssssssssssssssssssssssassast
Concentration in Treated
Waste from Plant Q
(mg/kg)
1.1, 1.2, 1.8, 0.74
0.67, <0.33, <0.33, 0.48
0.94, 0.37, 0.45, 0.27
0.19, 0.09, 0.09, 0.09
' 1 HI
Concentration In Treated
Wastes from Plant R
(mg/kg) ||
<0.99, <1.3, <1.3", <22
33, 1.8, 14.0, 13.0"
<0.65, <5.0", 2.0, 0.5
1.2, 7.91, 4.1, 0.5
asaramauass ' , ,„
Concentration tn Treated Wastes from Plant T
(mg/kg)
NO DATA
0.33, 3.0, -, 0.19, 5.4, -, 3.7, 2.7, -, -, -',' -
1.46, <0.05, 0.04, 0.04, 0.1, -> -, -, <0.1, <0.1, <0.1,
<0.1
3.36, 024, 0.59, 0.34, 0.1, -,0.13, 0.1, *0.1, <0.1, <0.1,
<0.1
< - Indicates a detection limit value
Trcalmcnl performance data used to develop K048-K052, F037, F038 treatment standard.
NKJ-071
(lf.29-()l.nrj
6419
-------
-------
7.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Radian Corporation provided technical support for the development of this
document to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste under
Contract Numbers 68-W9-0072, 68-WO-0025, and 68-W3-0001. This document was
prepared under the direction of Richard Kinch, Chief, Waste Treatment Branch; Larry
Rosengrant, Section Chief, Treatment Technology Section; and Angela Wilkes an
-------
-------
8.0 REFERENCES
1. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and the
Water Pollution Control Federation. Standard Methods for the Examination of
Water and Wastewater. Sixteenth Edition. American Public Health Association.
Washington, D.C., 1985.
2. USEPA. July, 1994. Final Best Demonstrated Available Technology rBDAT>
Background Document for Universal Standards. Volume B: Universal Standards
for Wastewater Forms of Wastes. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
3. USEPA. October 23, 1991. Final Best Demonstrated Available Technology
(BOAT) Background Document for Quality Assurance /Quality Control
Procedures and Methodology. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
4. USEPA. Office of Solid Waste. Land Disposal Restrictions; Potential
Treatment Standards for Newly Identified and Listed Wastes and Contaminated
Debris; Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. Federal Register. (56 FR
24444). May 30, 1991.
5. USEPA. January, 1991. Treatment Technology Background Document U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C
6. USEPA. November 12, 1987. Qnsite Engineering Report of Treatment
Technology Performance and Operation of Incineration of K001-
Pentachlorophenol (TCP) Waste at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Combustion Research Facility. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Washington, D.C.
>
7. USEPA. November 23, 1987. Onsite Engineering Report of Treatment
Technology Performance and Operation of Incineration of KQOl-Creosote Waste
at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Combustion Research Facility. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C.
8. USEPA. March 11, 1988. Nonconfidential Version of the Onsite Engineering
Report of Treatment Technology Performance and Operation for Rollins
Environmental Services fDO Inc.. Deer Park. Texas. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency. Washington, D.C.
NRJ-073
0629-Ol.nrj v g.J
-------
9. USEPA. 1987. Onsite Engineering Report of Treatment Technology
Performance and Operation: Incineration of K024 Waste at the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency Combustion Research Facility. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C.
10. USEPA. November 16, 1987. Qnsite Engineering Report of Treatment
Technology Performance and Operation of Incineration of K037 Waste at the
Combustion Research Facility. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Washington, D.C.
11. USEPA. February 22, 1988. Onsite Engineering Report of Treatment
Technology Performance and Operation for Incineration of K087 Waste at the
Combustion Research Facility. Jefferson. Arkansas. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency. Washington, D.C.
12. USEPA. April 25,1988. Qnsite Engineering Report for John Zink Company for
K101. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C.
13. USEPA. April 25, 1988. Onsite Engineering Report for John Zink Company for
K102. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C.
14. USEPA. June, 1986. Characterization of Hazardous Waste Incineration
Residuals. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C.
15. USEPA. April, 1989. Onsite Engineering Report of Treatment Technology
Performance and Operation for Incineration for ENSCO. El Dorado. Arkansas.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C.
16. USEPA. April, 1990. Onsite Engineering Report of the Third Thirds
Incineration Treatabilitv Test at the John Zink Comoanv. Tulsa. OK. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
17. Rollins Environmental Services, Inc. 1988. RES (TX) EDB Test Burn Program
Emissions Test Results, Volume 1. Rollins Environmental Services. Deer Park,
TX.
18. Chemical Waste Management, Inc. 1989. Treated Bio-solids Data Representing
Thermal Drying. Submitted to EPA RCRA Docket F-89-LD12-FFFFF.
Comment No. LD12S0591. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington,
D.C.
19. USEPA. 1989. Final Onsite Engineering Report of Stabilization of F024 Rotary-
Kiln Incinerator Ash at U.S. Armv Corps of Engineers' Waterways Experiment
Station. Vicksburg. Mississippi. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
NRJ-073 ^
0629-01.ni] 8-2
-------
20. USEPA 1988. Onsite Engineering Report for th* Stabilization of Waste
K046 at U.S. Armv Corps of Engineers' Waterways Experiment Station.
Vicksburg, Mississippi. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid
Waste. Washington, D.C. . .
21. USEPA February, 1988. Onsite Engineering Report of Stabilization of K048-
K052 Fluidized-Bed Incineration Ash at Waterways Experiment Station.
Vicksburg, Mississippi. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid
Waste. Washington, D.C
22. USEPA. 1990. Final Onsite Engineering Report of Treatment Performance and
Operation for Stabilization of KQ48-K052 Solvent Extraction Residues at the U.S.
Armv Corps of Engineers' Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksburg. Mississippi.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
23. USEPA 1988. Draft Onsite Engineering Report for Horsehead Resource
Development Co.. Inc.. Palmerton. PA for K061. U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
24. USEPA 1988. Draft Qnsite Engineering Report for Waterways Experiment
Station for K061. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste.
Washington, D.C.
25. USEPA December, 1986. Onsite Engineering Report of Treatment Technology
Performance and Operation for Envirite Corporation. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
26. USEPA 1988. Final Onsite Engineering Report of Treatment Technology
Performance and Operation for Vulcan Materials Company. Port Edwards.
Wisconsin. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste.
Washington, D.C.
27. USEPA February, 1988. Onsite Engineering Report of Treatment Technology
Performance and Operation for Amoco Oil Company. Whiting. Indiana. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
28. USEPA May, 1990. Best Demonstrated Available Technology
Background Document for KQ01 (Addendum^ and U051 (Creosote Y U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
29. USEPA June, 1989. Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAT>
Background Document for KQQ9 and K010. U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj
-------
30. USEPA. May, 1990. Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BOAT)
Background Document Addendum for K015. U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
31. USEPA. August, 1988. Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAT)
Background Document for K016. KQ18. K019. K020. K030. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
32. USEPA. May, 1990. Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAT)
Background Document for Wastes from the Production of Epichlorohvdrin. K017.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
33. USEPA. May, 1990. Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAT)
Background Document for K021. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C. .
34. USEPA. June, 1989. Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAT)
Background Document for Phthalate Wastes. U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
35. USEPA. May 25, 1989. Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAT)
Background Document for Wastes from the Production of 1.1.1-Trichloroethane,
KQ28. K029. KQ95. and K096. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Solid Waste. Washington, D.C
36. USEPA. May, 1990. Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAT)
Background Document for Haloeenated Pesticide and Chlorobenzene Wastes
KQ32-K034. K041. K042. KQ85. KQ97. K1Q5. D012-D017. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
37. USEPA. May, 1990. Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAT)
Background Document for Wastewater Treatment Sludges Generated in the
Production of Creosote. K035. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Solid Waste. Washington, D.C. .
38. USEPA. August, 1988. Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAT)
Background Document for K037. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C
39. USEPA. June, 1989. Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAT)
Background Document for Oreanophosphorus Wastes. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
NRJ-073 -
0629-Ol.nij . 0-4
-------
40. USEPA. May, 1990. Best Demonstrated Available Technology YBDAT)
Background Document for K060. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office
of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
41. USEPA. May, 1990. Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAT>
Background Document for Kfl73 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office
of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
42. USEPA. May, 1990. Best Demonstrated Available Technology rBDAT>
Background Document for Distillation Bottoms from the Production of Aniline.
KQ83. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste.
Washington, D.C.
43. USEPA May, 1990. Best Demonstrated Available Technology
• Background Document for K086 rink Formulation Equipment Cleaning Wastes't
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
44. USEPA. August, 1988. Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAD
Background Document for Kns? U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office
of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
45. USEPA. August, 1988. Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAT>
Background Document for K101 and K102. Low Arsenic Suhcategnry U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
46. USEPA. August, 1988. Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAT>
Background Document for K103 and K104. U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
47. USEPA. June, 1992. Best Demonstrated Available Technology fBDAT>
Background Document for F001-FQQ5 Spent Solvents. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
48. USEPA. May, 1990. Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAT>
Background Document for Wastes from the Production of Chlorinated Aliphatics.
FQ25. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste.
Washington, D.C.
49. USEPA. May, 1990. Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAT1
Background Document for U and P Wastes and Multi-Source Leachate (F039).
- Volume C: Nonwastewater Forms of Organic U and P Wastes and Multi-Source
Leachate (F039) for Which There are Concentration-Based Treatment Standards.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
\RJ-073
0629-01.nr|
-------
50. USEPA. May, 1990. Final Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAD
Background Document for K031. K084. K101. K102. Characteristic Arsenic
Wastes (D004X Characteristic Selenium Wastes (D010\ and P and U Wastes
Containing Arsenic and Selenium Listing Constituents. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
51. USEPA. May, 1990. Final Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAT)
Background Document for Barium Wastes (D005 and P013). U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C
52. USEPA. May, 1990. Final Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAT)
Background Document for Chromium Wastes (D007 and U032X U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
53. USEPA. May, 1990. Final Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAT)
Background Document for D008 and P and U Lead Wastes. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
54. USEPA. May, 1990. Final Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAT)
Background Document for Mercury-ContaiTiing Wastes D009. K106. P065. P092.
and U151. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste.
Washington, D.C
55. USEPA. May, 1990. Final Best Dempnstrated Available Technology (BDAT)
Background Document for Silver-Containing Wastes. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C
56. USEPA. August, 1988. Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAT>
Background Document for F006. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office
of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
57. USEPA. - May, 1990. Final Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDATV
Background Document for Inorganic Pigment Wastes. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
58. USEPA. May, 1990. Final Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAT)
•Background Document for K046 (Addendum). U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency. Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
59. USEPA. August, 1988. Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAT)
Background Document for K048. K049. K050. K051. and K052. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
NRJ-073 v
062,9-Ol.nij • 8-6
-------
60. USEPA. May, 1990. Final Amendment to the Best Demonstrated Available
Technology (BDAT> Background Docuntent for Wastes from the Petroleum
Refining Industry. K04S. Kn49. KQ50. KQ51. and K052 U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
61. USEPA. July, 1992. Final Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAT)
Background Document ( Addendum') for all Nonwastewater Forms of KQ61 and
Alternative BDAT Treatment Standards for FQ06 and K062 NonwastewatP.™
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C
62. USEPA. August, 1988. Final Best Demonstrated Available Technology YBDAT^
Background Document for K(\K> U.S.- Environmental Protection Agency Office
of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
63. USEPA. May, 1990. Final Treatment Standards for K069 Nnnwastewaters in th*
Calcium Sulfate /Sodium Subcategorv and Wastewater Forms of KQ69. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
64. USEPA. August, 1988. Final Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDATt
Background Document for K071 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office
of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
65. USEPA. May, 1989. Final Treatment Standards for Nonwastewater anri
Wastewater Forms of K100. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Solid Waste. Washington, D.C. .
66. USEPA. March, 1987. Generic Quality Assurance Project Plan for
Disposal Restrictions Program ("BDAT'l U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C
67. USEPA. July, 1994. Final Data Document for Characterization and Performance
of High Temperature Metals Recovery Treatment and Stabilization for Metal-
Bearing Nonwastewaters. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid
Waste. Washington, D.C
68. USEPA. September, 1986. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,
Physical /Chemical Methods. SW-846. Third Edition. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C
69. USEPA. July, 1992. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste.
Physical /Chemical Methods. SW-846. Update I. U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C
NRJ-073
0629-01.nij
-------
70. USEPA. May, 1991. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste.
Physical/Chemical Methods. SW-846. Proposed Update n. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
71. USEPA. August, 1988. Final Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BOAT)
Background Document for K011. K013. and K014. U.S.. Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
Background Document for Newly Listed Refinery Wastes F037 and F038. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
73. USEPA. August, 1988J Final Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BOAT)
Background Document for K022 (Non-CBI Version). U.S. Environmental
'Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
74. USEPA. 1988. Onsite Engineering Report of Treatment Technology
Performance and Operation for Incineration of K011/K013/K014 Sludge at John
Zink Testing Facility. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid
Waste. Washington, D.C.
75. USEPA. May, 1989. Final Best Demonstrated Available Technology (BDAT)
Background Document for Wastes from the Production of Chlorinated Aliphatic
Hydrocarbons. F024. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid
Waste. Washington, D.C.
76. USEPA July 8, 1994. Report on Chromium Treatment and the Development/
Derivation of the Universal Treatment Standard for Chromium. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste. Washington, D.C.
NRJ-073
0629-01.nrj
8-8
-------
. . Appendix A
Analytical Methods for Constituents Selected for Regulation
Under Universal Standards
NRJ-07I
0718-OZmj
-------
-------
Appendix A
Analytical Methods for Constituents Selected for Regulation
Under Universal Standards
This appendix presents analytical methods for the analysis of constituents
selected for regulation in nonwastewater forms of universal standards wastes. All
methods are from Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste. Physical/ Chemical
Methods (SW-846) (68, 69, 70). The Agency believes that these methods are appropriate
for nonwastewater and wastewater forms of listed hazardous wastes.
Table A-l presents the constituents selected for regulation and the SW-846
methods that are used to analyze for the constituents. The first method listed for each
constituent is the most common method of analysis. Additional guidance on which
approved method is appropriate for a specific sample is found in each SW-846 method.
Table A-2 lists the SW-846 methods and the instrument used for analyses.
NRJ-071
0718-02.nrj
-------
Table A-l
Analytical.Methods" for Constituents Selected for Regulation
in Nonwastewater Forms of Universal Standards Wastes
Treatability Group
Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Carbon Disulfidc
Chlorinated Pesticides
Conatltuettt Selected for Regulation
Benzene
Ethylbenzene .
Toluene
Xylene(s) (total)
Carbon Disulfide
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Chlordane
o,p'-DDD
p,p'-DDD
o,p'-DDE
p,p'-DDE
o,p'-DDT
p,p'-DDT
j ; |AiuJ|j(lc«I Method " ;,;-
8240, 8020
8240,8020
8240,8020
8240, 8020
8240,8015
8080
8080
8080
8080
8080
8080
8080
8080
8080
8080
8080
8080
NRJ-071
0718-02.nrj
-------
Treatability Group
Chlorinated Pesticides (Continued)
Chlorinated Phenolics and Derivatives
Table A-l
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for Regulation
Dieldrtn
Endosulfan I
Endosuifan II
Endosulfan sulfate
Endrin
Endrin aldehyde
Heptachlor
Heptachlor eporide
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Isodrin
Kepone
Methoxychlor
Toxaphene
p-Chloro-m-cresol
2-ChlorophenoI
2,4-Dichlorophenol
Analytical Method
8270,8250, 8120
8270, 8250, 8120
8080
8270, 8040
8270, 8250, 8040
8270, 8040
NRJ-071
07l8-02.nrj
-------
Table A-l
(Continued)
Treatablllty Group
Chlorinated Phenolics and Derivatives
(Continued)
Chlorobenzenes
Constituent Selected tor Regulation ' •: : :
2,6-Dichlorophenol
2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D)
Pentachlorophenol
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichloropheool
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Silvex (2,4,5-TP)
2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxy acetic acid
Chlorobenzcne •
m-Dichlorobenzene
o-Dichlorobenzcne
p-Dichlorobenzene
Hexachlorobenzeoe
Pentachlorobenzene
Pentachloronitrobenzene
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzcne
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene .
AoalytloU Method
8270
8150
8270, 8250, 8040
8270, 8250, 8040
8270, 8250, 8040
8270, 8250, 8040
8150
8150
8240,8020
8270, 8250, 8010
8270, 8250, 8120, 8010
8270, 8250, 8120, 8010
8270, 8250, 8120
8270
8270
8270, 8250, 8120
8270
NRJ-071
0718-02.nrj
-------
NRJ-071
0718-02.nrj
Table A-l
(Continued)
ConsUtucot Selected for Regulation
bis(2-Chloroeth(Miy)methane
Chloroform
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
Chloromethane
2-Chloronaphthalene
3-Chloropropene
Oichlorodifluoromethaae
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Pichloroethylene
trans-l,2-Dichloroethylene
1,2-Dichloropropane
8240, 8010
8270,8110
8240,8010
8270,8120
8240,8010
8240,8010
8240, 8010
8240,8010
8240,8010
8240, 8010
8240, 8010
-------
1
'•£
u
I
I
J
u
U
i.
I
i
3
i
s
00
o
•O
u
73
—.
r+ rj
il
A-6
-------
Table A-l
(Continued)
Treatabllity Group
Halogenated Volatiles (Continued)
Non-Chlorinated Phenolics
Non-Chlorinated Phcnolics (C'ontinued)
Organo-Bromines
Constituent Selected for Regulation
Vinyl chloride
2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol(Dinoseb)
m-Cresol
o-Cresol
p-Cresol
2,4-DimethylphenoI
4,6-Dinitro-o-crcsol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
o-Nitrophenol
p-Nitrophenol
Phenol
Bromodichloromethans
Bromoform (Tribromomethane)
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
Bromomethane (Methyl bromide) :
Chlorodibromomethane
l,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
•:|yilia«|}flc«I- Method
8240, 8010
8270, 8015
8270, 8250, 8040
8270, 8250, 8040
8270, 8250, 8040
8270, 8250, 8040
8270, 8250, 8040
8270, 8250, 8040
8270,8040
8270,8040
8270, 8250, 8040
8240, 8010
8240, 8020
8270
8240, 8010
8240, 8010
8240, 8010
NRJ-071
0718-02.nrj
-------
r
Table A-l
(Continued)
Treatabllity Group
Organo-Bromines (Continued)
Organo-Nitrogen Compounds
Constituent Selected for Regulation -• ?'
tris-(2,3-Dibromopropyl) phosphate
Dibromomethane
Ethylene dibromide (1,2-Dibromoethanc)
Acetonitrile
2-Acetylaminofluorene
Acrylamide
Acrylonitrile
Aniline
prChloroaniline
1,4-Dinitrobcnzcne
2,4-Dinitrotolucne
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Diphenylamine/Diphcnylnitrosamine (sum)
Di-n-propylnitrosamine
Methyacrylonitrilc
Methyapyrilene
5-Nitro-o-toluidinc
: ,;:.;^i»|yt(c«a Method /.;'"''
8270
8240, 8010
8240, 8010
8240
8270
8015
8240,8030
8270, 8250
8270
8270
8270, 8250, 8090, 8060
8270,8250,8090,8060
8270
8270
8240*
8270
8270
00
NRJ-071
0718-02.nij
-------
Table A-l
TreatabUity Group
Organo-Nitrogen Compounds (Continued)
Organo-Sulfur Pesticides
(Continued)
Constituent Selected for Regulation
Nitrobenzene
N-Nitroso-di-n-butylamine
N-Nitrosodiethylamine
N-Nitrosodimethyiamine
N-Nitrosodimethylethyfainine
N-Nitrosomorpholine
N-Nitrosopiperidine
N-Nitropyrrolidine
Phenacetin
Pronamide
Propanenitrile (Ethyl cyanide)
Pyridine
Disulfoton
Famphur
Methyl parathion
8270, 8250,8090
8270
8270
8270
8270
8270
8270
8270
8270
8270
8240,8015
8270
8140
8140
8140
NRJ-071
071g-02.nij
-------
Table A-l
(Continued)
Treatablllty Group
Organo-Sulfur Pesticides (Continued)
Oxygenated Hydrocarbons
Constituent Selected for Regulation f^
Parathion
Phorate
Acetone
Acetophenone
n-Butanol
1,4-Dioxane
Ethyl acetate
Ethyl ether
Ethyl methacrylate
Isobutanol
Isosafrole
Methanol
Methyl ethyl ketone
Methyl isobutyl ketone
Methyl methacrylate
Safrole
'""•Aiutytya! Method
8140
8140
8240
8270
8015*
8240*. 8015
8240
8240,8015
8240,8015
8015*
8270
8015*
8240,8015
8240,8015
8240, 8015
8270
NRJ-071
0718-02.nrj
-------
RGBs and Dioxins
Phthalates
NRJ-071
0718-02.nij
Table A-l
(Continued)
Treatability Group
Constituent Selected for Regulation
Analytical Method
Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins
Hexachlorodibenzofurans
Pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins
Pentachlorodibenzofurans
Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxins
Tetracnlorodibenzofurans
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
PCBs (total)
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
8280,8290
8280, 8290
8280,8290
8280,8290
8080,8081
8080,8081
8080,8081
8080,8081
8080,8081
8080,8081
8080,8081
8270, 8060
8270, 8060
8270, 8060
-------
Table A-l
(Continued)
Treatability Group
Phthalales (Continued)
Polynucleai Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Constituent Selected for Regulation .
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
Phthalic Anhydride
Acenaphthalene
Acenaphthene
Anthracene
Benz(a)anthracene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene/Benzo(k)fluoranthene (sum)
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(a)pyrenc
Chrysene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Indeno(l,2,3)pyrene
3-Methylcholanthrene
Aualjllcal Method
8270, 8060
8270, 8060
8270, 8060
8270, 8060
8270, 8100
8270, 8100
8270, 8100
8270, 8250, 8100, 8310
8270, 8250, 8100, 8310
8270, 8250, 8100, 8130
8270,8100
8270, 8250, 8100, 8310
8270, 8100
8270, 8100
8270,8100
8270,8100
8270
N)
NRJ-071
0718-02.ni]
-------
Table A-l
(Continued)
Treatability Group
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
(Continued)
Metals
Constituent Selected for Regulation :V:
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Analytical Method .
8270,8250,8100
8270, 8100
8270, 8100
6010,7040,7041
7060,6010,7061
6010,7080,7081
6010, 7090, 7091
6010, 7130, 7131
6010,7190,7191
7421, 6010, 7420
7471
6010, 7520, 7521
7740, 6010, 7741
6010, 7760, 7761
NRJ-071
0718-02.nrj
-------
Table A-l
(Continued)
Treatability Group
Metals (Continued)
Constituent Selected (or Regulation Jff :
Thallium
Zinc
"V Analytical Method
7841, 6010, 7840
6010, 7950, 7951
•All methods are from SW-846. The First method listed for each constituent is the most common method of analysis.
•"Direct-injection gas chromatography (GC) or gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS).
NRJ-071
0718-02.nrj
-------
Table A-2
Analytical Methods
Instrumentation
Method
:.''K:.:jv.JftmibW »
6010
7040
7041
7060
7061
7080
7081
7090
7091
7130
7131
7190
7191
7210
7420
7421
7470
7520
7521
7740
7741
7760
7761
7840
7841
|
Method Instni9ieirt*if0B s
Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (ICP)
Atomic Absorption, Direct Aspiration (AA)
Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption (GFAA)
GFAA •
Gaseous-Hydride Atomic Absorption (GHAA)
AA .
GFAA
AA
GFAA .
AA
GFAA
AA - , • •
GFAA
AA '• ' . . •
AA
GFAA . .
Cold Vapor Atomic Absorption, Wastewaters Only
AA
GFAA
GFAA . I
GHAA 1
AA . . . I
GFAA .
AA • /
GFAA .
: =
NRJ-071
0718-02.nrj
A-15
-------
Table A-2
(Continued)
Method
Number
7910
7911
7950
7951
S010
8015
8020
8030
8040
8060
8080
8081
8090
8100
8110
8120
8140
8150
8240
8250
8270
8280
8290
8310
Method Instrumentation
AA
GFAA : •
AA '
GFAA
Gas Chromatography/Electrolytic Conductivity Detector (GC/HECD)
Gas Chromatography /Flame lonizadon Detector (GC/FID)
Gas Chromatography/Photo-ionizadon Detector (GC/PID)
GC/FID
GC/FID
Gas Chromatography/Electron Capture Detector (GC/ECD) or GC/FID
GC/ECD or HECD
GC/ECD .
GC/ECD or FID
GC/FID
GC/HECD
GC/ECD
GC/Flame Photometric or Thermionic Detector
Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)
GC/MS
GC/MS
GC/MS
High Resolution Gas Chromatography/Low Resoludon Mass Spectrometry
(HRGC/LRMS) .
High Resoludon Gas Chromatography/High Resoludon Mass Spectrometry
(HRGC/HRMS)
High Performance Liquid Chromatography/Ultraviolet Spectroscopy (HPLC/UV)
NRJ-071
0718-02,n«j
A-16
-------
|