United States Solid Waste and EPA530-R-96-011
Environmental Protection Emergency Response PB96 1 87-729
Agency (5305W) July 1996
RCRA Permit Policy
Compendium Update Package
Revision 5
Photocopied on recycled paper that contains at least 20 % post consumer fiber
-------
-------
*** IMPORTANT ***
INSTRUCTIONS
CAREFULLY READ AND FOLLOW THE STEP-
BY-STEP INSTRUCTIONS LISTED BELOW:
Step 1: Replace all of the spines and covers in your existing
bound compendium volumes
Step 2: Update your copy of the compendium by appending
the July 1996 update documents as indicated on the
attached cover sheets
Step 3: Confirm that the first and the last document in each
volume corresponds to the sections that are indicated
on the associated cover and spine
-------
ijir»i; jsiiij;if|!!|i ••; l!;,'f ;;
:i! ! • :— r • *i
l • I !
Ihis Page Intentionally Left Blank
-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE JULY 1996
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM UPDATE PACKAGE
For your convenience, we have provided a list of the documents (organized by volume number and
reference number) which are contained in the July 1996 RCRA Permit Policy Compendium Update
Package. There are no current update documents for Volume 3, Volume 8, Volume 11 or Volume
12.
Volume!
9432.1995(01)
9432.1995(02)
Volume 4
9441.1995(01)
9441.1995(02)
9441.1995(03)
9441.1995(04)
9441.1995(05)
9441.1995(06)
9441.1995(07)
9441.1995(08)
9441.1995(09)
9441.1995(10)
9441.1995(11)
9441.1995(12)
9441.1995(13)
9441.1995(14)
9441.1995(15)
9441.1995(16)
9441.1995(17)
9441.1995(18)
9441.1995(19)
9441.1995(20)
9441.1995(21)
9441.1995(22)
9441.1995(23)
9441.1995(24)
9441.1995(25)
9441.1995(26)
9441.1995(27)
-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE JULY 1996
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM UPDATE PACKAGE
(Continued)
Volume 4 (continued)
9441.1995(28)
9441.1995(29)
9441.1995(30)
9441.1995(32)
9441.1995(33)
9441.1995(34)
Volume 5
9442.1995(01)
9442.1995(02)
9442.1995(03)
9442.1995(04)
9443.1995(01)
9443.1995(02)
9443.1995(03)
Volume 6
9444.1995(01)
9444.1995(02)
9445.1995(01)
9451.1995(01)
9455.1995(01)
9455.1995(02)
Volume 7
9462.1995(01)
9462.1995(02)
9475.1995(01)
9475.1995(02)
9482.1995(01)
-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE JULY 1996
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM UPDATE PACKAGE
(Continued)
Volume 9
9487.1995(01)
9489.1995(01)
9489.1995(02)
9497.1995(01)
9498.1995(01)
9498.1995(02)
Volume 10
9502.1995(01)
9502.1995(02)
9502.1995(03)
Volume 13
9551.1995(01)
9554.1995(01)
9554.1995(02)
9561.1995(01)
9592.1995(01)
9592.1995(02)
9593.1995(01)
-------
-Cat
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM
For your convenience, we have provided a complete list of the documents (organized by
reference number) which are contained in the updated RCRA Permit Policy Compendium.
9431.1984(01) 9431.1987(01) 9431.1987(02)
9431.1987(03) 9431.1988(01) -. 9431.1988(02)
9431.1989(01) 9431.1989(02) 9431.1989(03)
9431.1990(01) 9431.1991(01) 9431.1991(02)
9431.1991(03) 9431.1993(01) 9431.1994(01)
9431.1994(02) 9432.00-1 9432.1980(01)
9432.1981(01) 9432.1982(01) 9432.1983(01)
9432.1983(02) 9432.1984(01) 9432.1984(03)
9432.1984(04) 9432.1984(05) 9432.1984(06)
9432.1984(07) 9432.1985(02) 9432.1985(03)
9432.1985(04) 9432.1985(05) 9432.1985(07)
9432.1985(08) 9432.1985(10) 9432.1986(01)
9432.1986(02) 9432.1986(03) 9432.1986(04)
9432.1986(05) 9432.1986(06) 9432.1986(08)
9432.1986(10) 9432.1986(12) 9432.1986(13)
9432.1986(14) 9432.1986(15) 9432.1986(16)
9432.1987(01) ' 9432.1987(02) 9432.1987(03)
9432.1987(05) 9432.1987(06) 9432.1987(07)
9432.1987(08) 9432.1987(09) . 9432.1987(10)
9432.1987(11) 9432.1987(12) 9432.1987(12a)
9432.1987(13) 9432.1988(01) 9432.1988(02)
9432.1988(03) 9432.1988(04) 9432.1988(05)
9432.1989(01) 9432.1989(02) 9432.1989(03)
9432.1989(04) 9432.1989(05) 9432.1990(01)
9432.1990(02) 9432.1990(03) 9432.1991(01)
9432.1993(01) = 9432.1993(02) 9432.1994(01)
9432.1994(02) 9432.1994(03) 9432.1995(01)
9432.1995(02) 9433.1984(03) 9433.1984(05)
9433.1984(06) 9433.1985(02)- 9433.1985(03)
9433.1985(04) 9433.1985(05) 9433.1985(06)
9433.1986(01) 9433.1986(04) 9433.1986(05)
9433.1986(06) 9433.1986(07) 9433.1986(08)
9433.1986(09) 9433.1986(10) 9433.1986(11)
9433.1986(12) 9433.1986(14) 9433.1986(16)
9433.1986(17) 9433.1986(19) 9433.1986(20)
9433.1986(21) 9433.1986(22) 9433.1986(23)
9433.1986(24) 9433.1987(01) 9433.1987(03)
-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM
(Continued)
9433.1987(04)
9433.1987(07}
9433.1987(10)
9433.1987(16)
9433.1987(21)
9433.1987(25)
9433.1988(02)
9433.1990(03)
9433.1990(06)
9433.1991(02)
9433.1994(02)
9441.1980(01)
9441.1980(04)
9441.1981(03)
9441.1981(06)
9441.1983 (04)
9441.1983 (10)
9441.1984(04)
9441.1984(07)
9441.1984(10)
9441.1984 (13)
9441.1984(18)
9441.1984(21)
9441.1984(24)
9441.1984(27)
9441.1984(30)
9441.1984(33)
9441.1984(36)
9441.1985(01)
9441.1985(05)
9441.1985(08)
9441.1985(11)
9441.1985(13)
9441.1985(19)
9441.1985(21)
9441.1985(25)
9441.1985(28)
9441.1985(29)
9441.1985(32)
9433.1987(05)
9433.1987(08)
9433.1987(14)
9433.1987(18)
9433.1987(22)
9433.1987(26)
9433.1990 (01)
9433.1990(04}
9433.1990(07)
9433.1991(03)
9433.1994(03)
9441.1980(02)
9441.1980 (05)
9441.1981(04)
94^1.1983(01)
9441.1983(07)
9441.1984(01)
9441.1984(05)
9441.1984(08)
9441.1984(11)
9441.1984 (14)
9441.1984 (19)
9441.1984(22)
9441.1984 (25)
9441.1984 (28)
9441.1984(31)
9441.1984 (34)
9441.1984(37)
9441.1985(02)
9441.1985(06)
9441.1985 (09)
9441.1985 (12)
9441.1985(15)
9441.1985(19a)
9441.1985(23)
9441.1985'(26)
9441.1985(28a)
9441.1985(30a)
9441.1985(33)
9433.1987(06)
9433.1987(09}
9433.1987(15)
9433.1987(20)
9433.1987(23)
9433.1987(27)
9433.1990(02)
9433.1990(05)
9433.1991(01)
9433.1994(01)
9434.1989(01)
9441.1980(03)
9441.1981(01)
9441.1981(05)
9441.1983(03)
9441.1983(08)
9441.1984(03)
9441.1984(06)
9441.1984 (09)
9441.1984(12)
9441.1984 (15)
9441.1984 (20)
9441.1984 (23)
9441.1984(26)
9441.1984(29)
9441.1984(32)
9441.1984(35)
9441.1984(38)
9441.1985(03)
9441.1985(07)
9441.1985(10)
9441.1985(12a)
9441.1985 (18)
9441.1985(20)
9441.1985(24)
9441.1985(27)
9441.1985(28b)
9441.1985 (31)
9441.1985(34)
-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM
(Continued)
9441.1985(35) 9441.1985(38) 9441.1985(39)
9441.1985(41) 9441.1985(42) 9441.1985(43)
9441.1985(44) 9441.1986(01) 9441.1986(02)
944l'.1986(03) 9441.1986(04) 9441.1986(05)
9441.1986(06) 9441.1986(07) 9441.1986(08)
9441.1986(09) 9441.1986(10) 9441.1986(11)
9441.1986(14) 9441.1986(16) 9441.1986(17)
9441.1986(19) 9441.1986(21) 9441.1986(22)
9441.1986(23) 9441.1986(24) 9441.1986(25)
9441.1986(26) 9441.1986(27) 9441.1986(28)
9441.1986(29) 9441.1986(30) 9441.1986(31)
9441.1986(32) 9441.1986(33) 9441.1986(34)
9441.1986(37) 9441.1986(38) 9441.1986(39)
9441.1986(40) 9441.1986(41) 9441.1986(42)
9441.1986(43) 9441.1986(44) 9441.1986(45)
9441.1986(45a) 9441.1986(46) 9441.1986(47)
9441.1986(48) 9441.1986(49) 9441.1986(51)
9441.1986(52) 9441.1986(53) 9441.1986(54)
9441.1986(55) 9441.1986(56) 9441.1986(57)
9441.1986(58) 9441.1986(59) 9441.1986(61)
9441.1986(62) 9441.1986(64) 9441.1986(65)
9441.1986(67) 9441.1986(69) . 9441.1986(72)
9441.1986(73) 9441.1986(74) 9441.1986(76)
9441.1986(78) 9441.1986(79) 9441.1986(80)
9441.1986(81) 9441.1986(82) 9441.1986(83)
9441.1986(84) 9441.1986(85) 9441.1986(86)
9441.1986(87) 9441.1986(88) 9441.1986(89)
9441.1986(92) 9441.1986(94) 9441.1986(95)
9441.1986(96) 9441.1986(97) 9441.1986(98)
9441.1987(02) 9441.1987(03) .9441.1987(04)
9441.1987(06) 9441.1987(08) 9441.1987(09)
9441.1987(10) 9441.1987(102) 9441.1987(11)
9441.1987(12) 9441.1987(13) 9441.1987(14)
9441.1987(15) 9441.1987(16) 9441.1987(17)
9441.1987(18) 9441.1987(19) 9441.1987(20)
9441.1987(21) 9441.1987(24) 9441.1987(26)
9441.1987(28) 9441.1987(29) 9441.1987(30)
9441.1987(31) 9441.1987(32) 9441.1987(36)
9441.1987(37) 9441.1987(39) 9441.1987(40)
-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM
(Continued)
9441.1987(41)
9441.1987(46}
9441.1987(54)
9441.1987(59)
9441.1987(65)
9441.1987(70)
9441.1987(74)
9441.1987(77)
9441.1987(83)
9441.1987(98)
9441.1988(04)
9441.1988(07)
9441.1988(11)
9441.1988(17)
9441.1988(23)
9441.1988(28)
9441.1988(32)
9441.1988(39)
9441.1988 (42)
9441.1988(47)
9441.1988(49)
9441.1989(02)
9441.1989(05)
9441.1989(12)
9441.1989(17)
9441.1989(22)
9441.1989(27)
9441.1989(30)
9441.1989(34)
9441.1989(42)
9441.1989(48)
9441.1989(51)
9441.1989(54)
9441.1990(01)
9441.1990(04)
9441.1990(07)
9441.1990(09a)
9441.1990(11)
9441.1990(13a)
9441.1987(42)
9441.1987(52)
9441.1987(57)
9441.1987(61)
9441.1987(66)
9441.1987(71)
9441.1987(75)
9441.1987(77a)
9441.1987(84)
9441.1987(99)
9441.1988(05)
9441.1988(08)
9441.1988(13)
9441.1988 (19),
9441.1988(25)
9441.1988(30)
9441.1988(33)
9441.1988(40)
9441.1988(44)
9441.1988(48)
9441.1988(50)
9441.1989(03)
9441.1989(10)
9441.1989 (14)
9441.1989(19)
9441.1989 (23)
9441.1989(27a)
9441.1989(31)
9441.1989 (39)
9441.1989(43)
9441.1989(49)
9441.1989 (52)
9441.1989(55)
9441.1990(02)
9441.1990(05)
9441.1990(08)
9441.1990(09b)
9441.1990 (12)
9441.1990(13b)
9441.1987(45)
9441.1987(53)
9441.1987(58)
9441.1987(64)
9441.1987(68)
9441.1987(73)
9441.1987(76)
9441.1987 (78)
9441.1987(96)
9441.1988 (03)
9441.1988 (06)
9441.1988 (09)
9441.1988(14)
9441.1988(20)
9441.1988 (27)
9441.1988(31)
9441.1988(36)
9441.1988(41)
9441.1988(45)
9441.1988(48a)
9441.1989(01)
9441.1989(04)
9441.1989(11)
9441.1989(15)
9441.1989(20)
9441.1989(24)
9441.1989(29)
9441.1989(32)
9441.1989(40)
9441.1989(47)
9441.1989(50)
9441.1989(53)
9441.1989(56)
9441.1990 (03)
9441.1990 (06)
9441.1990(09)
9441.1990(10)
9441.1990(13)
9441.1990(l3c)
-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM
(Continued)
9441.1990(13d)
9441.1990(15)
9441.1990(18)
9441.1990(21)
9441.1990(25)
9441.1990(28)
9441.1990(31)
9441.1990(34)
9441.1991(02)
9441.1991(05)
9441.1991(08)
9441.1991(11)
9441.1991(14)
9441.1991(16)
9441.1991(19)
9441.1992(03)
9441.1992 (06)
9441.1992(09)
9441.1992(12)
9441.1992(15)
9441.1992(18)
9441.1992(21)
9441.1992(24)
9441.1992(27)
9441.1992(30)
9441.1992(33)
9441.1992(36)
9441.1992(39)
9441.1992(42)
9441.1993(01)
9441.1993 (04)
9441.1993(07)
9441.1993 (10)
9441.1993(13)
9441.1993(16)
9441.1993(19)
9441.1993(22)
9441.1994(01)
9441.1994(04)
9441.1990(13e)
9441.1990(16)
9441.1990(19)
9441.1990(22)
9441.1990 (26)
9441.1990(29)
9441.1990(32)
9441.1990(35) .
9441.1991(03)
9441.1991(05a)
9441.1991(09)•
9441.1991(12)
9441.199l(14a)
9441.1991(17)
9441.1992(01)
9441.1992 (04)
9441.1992 (07)
9441.1992(10)
9441.1992 (13)
9441.1992(16)
9441.1992(19)
9441.1992 (22)
9441.1992(25)
9441.1992 (28)
9441.1992 (31)
9441.1992 (34)
9441.1992(37)
9441.1992 (40)
9441.1992 (43)
9441.1993(02)
9441.1993 (05)
9441.1993 (08)-
9441.1993 (11)
9441.1993 (14)
9441.1993(17)
9441.1993 (20)
9441.1993(23)
9441.1994(02)
9441.1994(05)
9441.1990(14)
9441.1990(17)
9441.1990(20)
9441.1990(23)
9441.1990(27)
9441.1990(30)
9441.1990(33)
9441.1991(01)
9441.1991(04)
9441.1991(06) -
9441.1991(10)
9441.1991(13)
9441.1991(15)
9441.1991(18)
9441.1992(02)
9441.1992(05)
9441.1992(08)
9441.1992(11)
9441.1992(14)
9441.1992(17)
9441.1992(20)
9441.1992(23)
9441.1992(26)
9441.1992(29)
9441.1992(32)
9441.1992(35)
9441.1992(38)
9441.1992(41)
9441.1992(44)
'9441.1993 (03)
9441.1993(06)
9441.1993(09)
9441.1993 (12)
9441.1993(15)
9441.1993(18)
9441.1993(21)
9441.1993(24)
9441.1994(03)
9441.1994(06)
-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM
(Continued)
9441.1994(07) 9441.1994(08) 9441 1994(09)
9441.1994(10) 9441.1994(11) 9441'1994 12
9441.1994 (13) 9441.1994 (14) 9441'1994 15
9441.1994(16) 9441.1994(17) 9441" 1994 if
9441.1994(19) - 9441.1994(20) 944l"l9942?
9441.1994(22) 9441.1994(23) 944l"l994 24
9441.1994(25) 9441.1994(26) 9441'1994 27
9441.1994(28) 9441.1994(29) 9441 1994 30
9441.1994(31) 9441.1994(32) 944l'l99501
944.1.1995(02) 9441.1995(03) 9441 1995 04
9441.1995(05) 9441.1995(06) 9441 1995 07
9441.1995(08) 9441.1995(09) 944l'l99MlO
9441.1995(11) 9441.1995(12) 944^95 13
9441.1995(14) 9441.1995(15) 944^'l995\l6
9441.1995(17) 9441.1995(18) lilies (ill
9441.1995(20) 9441.1995(21) llll^ll 22
9441.1995(23) 9441.1995(24) 944l'l99M25
9441.1995(26) 9441.1995(27) 9441 199M28
9441.1995(29) 9441.1995(30) 9441'1111(11}
9441.1995(32) 9441.1995(33) 94^19^ 34"
9442.1984(01) 9442.1985(01) 9442 1986 01
9442.1986 (02) 9442.1986 (03) ^42 ' 1986 04
9442.1986(04a) 9442.1986(07) ' 9442*1986 Ss
9442.1987(02) 9442.1987(03 si"""" 04
9442.1987 (06) 9442 .1988 (01) 9442 " 1988 02
9442.1988(03) 9442.1988(05) 9442*198806
9442.1989(01) 9442.1989(02) 94^2 ' 1989 03
9442.1989(04) 9442.1989(05 9442*^989 07
9442.1989(09) 9442.1990(01 9442*^99002
9442.1990(03) 9442.1990(04) 9442*1990 05
9442.1991(01) 9442.1991(02) 9442*199?of
9442.1991(04) 9442.1991(05)- 9442*1991 06
9442.1991(07) 9442.1991(08) 9442*1991 09
9442.1991 (10) 9442.1991 (11) 9442'1991 12
9442.1991(13) 9442.1991(14) 9442*199115
9442.1991(16) 9442.1991(17) 9442"1991 "
9442.1993(01) 9442.1993(02) 9442*1993 03
9442.1993(04) 9442.1993(05) 9442*199401
9442.1994(02) 9442.1994(03) 9442.*1994 04
-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM
(Continued)
9442 1994(05) 9442.1994(06) 9442.1995(01)
9442.199,5(02) 9442.1995(03) 9442.1995(04)
9443 1980(02) 9443.1980(03) 9443.1981(01)
9443 1983(01) 9443.1983(02) 9443.1983(03)
9443*1983(04) 9443.1983(05) 9443.1984(03)
9443 1984(04) 9443.1984(05) 9443.1984(06)
9443"l984(08) 9443.1984(09) 9443.1984(10)
9443 1985(01) 9443.1985(02) 9443.1985(04)
9443 1985(05) 9443.1985(07) 9443.1985(08)
94431985(09) 9443.1985(10) . 9443.1985(11)
9443 1986(02) 9443.1986(04) 9443.1986(05)
9443 1986(06) 9443.1986(09) 9443.1986(10)
9443 1986(11) 9443.1986(12) 9443.1986(13)
9443 1986(15) 9443.1986(16) 9443.1986(17)
9443 1986(18) 9443.1986(19) 9443.1987(01)
9443 1987(02) 9443.1987(04) 9443.1987(05)
9443.1987 (06) 9443.1987(07) 9443.1987(08)
9443 1987(09) 9443.1987(11) 9443.1987(12)
9443"l987(14) 9443.1987(16) 9443.1987(17)
9443 1987(18) 9443.1987(19) 9443.1987(20)
9443 1987(23) 9443.1987(24) 9443.1987(25)
9443 1987(26) 9443.1987(28) . 9443.1987(29)
9443 1987(30) 9443.1987(31) 9443.1987(32)
9443.1987(33) 9443.1988(01) 9443.1988(02)
9443 1988(03) 9443.1988(04) 9443.1988(05)
9443 1988(06) 9443.1988(07) 9443.1988(08)
9443.1988(09) 9443.1988(10) 9443.1988(11)
9443 1989(01) 9443.1989(02) 9443.1989(03)
9443\989(04) 9443.1989(07) 9443.1989(08)
9443.1989(08a) 9443.1989(09) 9443.1989(10)
94431990(01) 9443.1991(01) 9443 .1991.(02)
9443 1992(01) 9443.1992(02) 9443.1992(03)
94431992(04) 9443.1992(05) 9443.1992(06)
94431993(01) 9443.1993(02) 9443.1993(03)
9443 1993(04) 9443.1.993(05) 9443.1993(06)
9443"l993(07) 9443.1994(01) 9443.1994(02)
9443 1994(03) 9443.1994(04) . 9443.1994(05)
9443 1994(06) 9443.1995(01) 9443.1995(02)
94431995(03) 9444.1980(01) 9444.1980(02)
-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM
(Continued)
9444.1980 (03)
9444.1981(01)
9444.1981(04)
9444.1983(01)
9444.1984(01)
9444.1984(04)
9444.1984(07)
9444.1984(10)
9444.1984(14)
9444.1985(01)
9444.1985(05)
9444.1985(09)
9444.1985 (13)
9444.1985(15a)
9444.1986 (02)
9444.1986(07)
9444.1986 (11)
9444.1986(15)
9444.1986 (19)
9444.1986(23)
9444.1986(27)
9444.1986(30)
9444.1986(33)
9444.1987(04)
9444.1987(07)
9444.1987(10)
9444.1987(13)
9444.1987(16)
9444.1987(19)
9444.1987(23)
9444.1987(28)
9444.1987(31)
9444.1987(34)
9444.1987(37a)
9444.1987(40)
9444.1987(43)
9444.1987(48)
9444.1987(52)
9444.1988 (01)
9444.1980(05)
9444.1981(02)
9444.1981(05)
9444.1983(02)
9444.1984 (02)
9444.1984(05)
9444.1984(08)
9444.1984(11)
9444.1984 (16)
9444.1985 (02)
9444.1985(07)
9444.1985(11)
9444.1985 (14)
9444-1985 (16)
9444.1986 (03)
9444.1986(08)
9444.1986(13)
9444.1986 (16)
9444.1986 (20)
9444.1986(25)
9444.1986 (28)
9444.1986(31)
9444.1987(02)
9444.1987(05)
9444.1987(08)
9444.1987(11)
9444.1987(14)
9444.1987(17)
9444.1987(20)
9444.1987(26)
9444.1987(29)
9444.1987(31a)
9444.1987(36)
9444.1987(38)
9444.1987(41)
9444.1987(44)
9444.1987(49)
9444.1987(53)
9444.1988 (02)
9444.1980 (06)
9444.1981(03)
9444.1982(01)
9444.1983(03)
9444.1984(03)
9444.1984(06)
9444.1984(09)
9444.1984(12)
9444.1984(17)
9444.1985(03)
9444.1985(08)
9444.1985(12)
9444.1985(15)
9444.1985(17)
9444.1986(05)
9444.1986(09)
9444.1986(14)
9444.1986(17)
9444.1986(21)
9444.1986(26)
9444.1986(29)
9444.1986(32)
9444.1987(03)
9444.1987(06)
9444.1987(09)
9444.1987(12)
9444.1987(15)
9444.1987(18)
9444.1987(22)
9444.1987(27)
9444.1987(30)
9444.1987 (33)
9444.1987(37)
9444.1987(39)
9444.1987(42)
9444.1987(47)
9444.1987(51)
9444.1987(55)
9444.1988(02a)
-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM
(Continued)
9444.1988 (03)
9444.1988(07)
9444.1988(11)
9444.1988 (14)
9444.1989(02a)
9444.1989 (03)
9444.1989(06)
9444.1989 (09)
9444.1989(12)
9444.1990 (01)
9444.1990(04)
9444.1991(02)
9444.1991(05)
9444.1992 (02)
9444.1992 (05)
9444.1992 (08)
9444.1993 (02)
9444.1993 (05).
9444.1994 (03)
9444.1994(06)
9444.1994 (09)
9444.1995(02)
9445.1984 (03)
9445.1985(01)
9445.1985 (04)
9445.1987(01)
9445.1987(03a)
9445.1987(06)
9445.1992(01)
9445.1993(02)
9445.1993(05)
9445.1993(08)
9445.1994 (02)
9451.1980 (01)
9451.1984(02)
9451.1986(02)
9451.1986(07)
9451.1987(03)
9451.1989(02)
9444.1988(05)
9444.1988(09)
9444.1988(12)
9444.1988 (15)
9444. 1989 (02b)
9444,1989(04)
9444.1989(07)
9444.1989(10)
9444.1989(13)
9444.1990 (02)
9444.1990 (05)
9444.1991(03)
9444.1991 (06)
9444.1992 (03)
9444.1992(06)
9444.1992 (09)
9444.1993 (03)
9444.1994 (01)
9444.1994 (04)
9444.1994 (07)
9444.1994 (10)
9445.1984(01) .
9445.1984 (05)
9445.1985 (02)
9445.1985(05)
9445.1987(02)
9445.1987 (04)
9445.1989 (01)
9445.1992(02)
9445.1993 (03)
9445.1993 (06)
9445.1993(09)'
9445.1994 (03)
9451.1980 (02)
9451.1985(03)
9451.1986(03)
9451.1987(01)
9451.1987(04)
9451.1991(01)
9444.1988 (06)
9444.1988(10)
9444.1988(13)
9444.1989 (02)
9444.1989(02c)
9444.1989 (05)
9444.1989 (08)
9444.1989(11)
9444.1989(14)
9444.1990 (03)
9444.1991(01)
9444.1991(04)
9444.1992 (01)
9444.1992 (04)
9444.1992(07)
9444.1993 (01)
9444.1993 (04)
9444.1994 (02)
9444.1994 (05)
9444.1994 (08)
9444.1995 (01)
9445.1984 (02)
9445.1984 (06)
9445.1985 (03)
9445.1985(06)
9445.1987(03)
9445.1987 (05)
9445.1989 (02)
9445.1993 (01)
9445.1993 (04)
9445.1993 (07)
9445.1994(01)
9445.1995(01)
9451.1983 (02)
9451.1986 (01)
9451.1986(06)
9451.1987(02)
9451.1989(01)
9451.1991(02)
-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM
(Continued)
9451.1991(03)
9451.1993(02)
9451.1994(02)
9452.1984(03)
9452.1986(01)
9452.1987(01)
9452.1989(02)
9452.1993(01)
9453.1982(01)
9453.1984(03)
9453.1985(05)
9453.1986(02)
9453.1986(05)
9453.1986 (08)
9453.1987(03)
9453.1987(07)
9453.1988(02)
9453.1989(03)
9453.1989(07)
9453.1990(01)
9453.1991(01)
9453.1993(01)
9454.1984(01)
9454.1986(05)
9454.1994(02)
9455.1986(01)
9455.1989(01)
9455.1991(03)
9455.1995(02)
9456.1992(01)
9461.1983(01)
9461.1987(03)
9461.1988(01)
9461.1989(03)
9461.1990(02)
9461.1994(02)
9462.1993(01)
9462.1995(02)
9470.1985(01)
9451.1992 (01)
9451.1993 (03)
9451.1995(01)
9452.1985(01)
9452.1986(02)
9452.1987(02)
9452.1990 (01)
9452.1993(02)
9453.1984(01)
9453.1985(02)
9453.1985(06)
9453.1986(03)
9453.1986(06)
9453.1987(01)
9453.1987(04)
9453.1987(08)
9453.1988 (03)
9453.1989 (04)
9453.1989(07a)
9453.1990(02)
9453.1991(02)
9453.1993 (02)
9454.1986(01)
9454.1987(01)
9455.1982 (01)
9455.1987(01)
9455.1991(01)
9455.1994(01)
9456.1986(01)
9456.1994(01)
9461.1985(01)
9461.1987(04)
9461.1989 (01)
9461.1989(04)
9461.1991(01)
9462.1985(01)
9462.1994 (01)
9463.1980(01)
9471.1983(01)
9451.1993(01)
9451.1994(01)
9452.1984(02)
9452.1985(02)
9452.1986(03)
9452.1989(01)
9452.1991(01)
9452.1993 (03)
9453.1984(02)
9453.1985(04)
9453.1986(01)
9453.1986(04)
9453.1986(07)
9453.1987(02)
9453.1987(05)
9453.1987(09)
9453.1989(01)
9453.1989(05)
9453.1989(08)
9453.1990(03)
9453.1992(01)
9453.1994 (01)
9454.1986(02)
9454.1994(01)
9455.1985(01)
9455.1987(02)
9455.1991(02)
9455.1995(01)
9456.1987(01)
9457.1987(01)
9461.1986(01)
9461.1987(05)
9461.1989(02)
9461.1990(01)
9461.1994(01)
9462.1987(02)
9462.1995 (01)
9463.1980(02)
9471.1984(01)
-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM
(Continued)
9471.1984 (02)
9471.1984(05)
9471. 1988 (.02)
9471.1988(05)
9471.1993(01)
9472.1985 (01)
9472.1986(04)
9472.1988 (01)
9474.1984 (01)
9475.1985(02)
9475.1989(01)
9476.00-12
9476.00-16
9476.1984 (03)
9476.1985(01)
9476.1985 (04)
9476.1986 (Ola)
9476.1986 (04)
9476.1987 (05)
9476.1988 (01)
9476.1988 (03a)
9476.1989 (02)
9476.1991(01)
9476.1992 (02)
9477.00-5
9477.1982 (03)
9477.1983 (03) .
9477.1984 (02)
9477.1984 (06)
9477.1984 (09)
9477.1986 (02)
9477.1986 (05)
9477.1986(11)
9477.1986(16)
9477.1987(05)
9477.1987 (11)
9477.1988 (03)
9477.1988(06)
9477.1990 (02)
9471.1984(03)
9471.1986 (01)
9471.1988(03) .'
9471.1988(06)
9472.1983(01)
9472.1985(02)
9472.1986(06)
9472.1991(01)
9475.1984(01)
9475.1986 (Ola)
9475.1995(01)
9476.00-13
9476.00-18
9476.1984(04)
9476.1985(02)
9476.1985 (05)
9476.1986 (02)
9476.1987(01)
9476.1987(07)
9476.1988 (02a)
9476.1988 (04)
9476.1989(03) .
9476.1991(02)
9476.1993(01)
9477.00-6
9477.1983 (01)
9477.1983 (04)
9477.1984 (04)
9477.1984 (07)
9477.1985 (02)
9477.1986 (03)
9477.1986 (09) '
9477.1986(12)
9477.1987(01)
9477.1987(09)
9477.1987 (12)
9477.1988 (04)
9477.1989 (01)
9477.1993(01)
9471.1984(04)
9471.1987(02),
9471.1988 (04)
9471.1989(01)
9472.1983 (02)
9472,1986(02)
9472.1987(01)
9472.1994 (01)
9475.1985(01)
9475.1987(01)
9475.1995(02)
9476.00-14
9476.1983 (02)
9476.1984(05)
9476.1985(03)
9476.1986(01)
9476.1986 (03)
9476.1987(03)
9476.1987(08)
9476.1988(03)
9476.1989(01)
9476.1990 (01)
9476.1992 (01)
9476.1993 (02)
9477.1982(01)
9477.1983 (02)
9477.1984 (01)
9477.1984 (05)
9477.1984 (08)
9477.1986 (01)
9477.1986 (04)
9477.1986(10)
9477.1986 (13)
9477.1987(03)
9477.1987 (10)
9477.1988 (01)
9477.1988(05)
9477.1990(01)
9477.1994 (01)
-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM
(Continued)
9477
9477
9480
9480
9481
9481
9481
9481
9481
9481
9481
9481
9481
9482
9483
9483
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9484.
9484.
.1994(02)
.1994(05)
.1984(01)
.1987(01)
.1985(Ola)
.1985(04)
.1986(01)
.1986(06)
.1987(01)
.1987(04)
.1987(07)
.1988(03)
.1992(02)
.1993(01)
.1983(01)
.1983(04)
.1984(02)
.1986(02)
.1986(05)
.1986(08)
.1986(11)
.1987(02)
.1987(05)
.1987(08)
.1987(11)
.1987(14)
.1987(17)
1987(20)
1988(03)
1988(06)
1988(09)
1988(12)
1988(15)
1989(01)
1989(04)
1989(07)
1990(03)
00-5a
1985(01)
9477
9477
9480
9480
9481
9481
9481
9481
9481
9481
9481
9481
9482
9482
9483
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9484.
9484.
.1994(03)
.1994 (06)
.1985(01)
.1987(02)
.1985(Olb)
.1985(05)
.1986(02)
.1986(08)
.1987(02)
.1987(05)
.1988(01)
.1991(01)
.1985(01)
.1994 (01)
.1983 (02)
.1983(05)
.1984 (03)
.1986(03)
.1986(06)
.1986(09)
.1986(12)
.1987(03)
.1987(06)
.1987 (09)
.1987(12)
.1987(15)
1987(18)
1988(01)
1988(04)
1988(07)
1988 (10)
1988(13).
1988 (16)
1989(02)
1989(05)
1990(01)
1991(01)
1984(01)
1985(Olb)
9477
9480
9480
9481
9481
9481
9481
9481
9481
9481
9481
9481
9482
9482
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9483.
9484.
9484.
.19,94 (04)
.00-14
.1985(02)
.1985(01)
.1985(03)
.1985(06)
.1986(04)
.1986(10)
.1987(03)
.1987(06)
.1988 (02)
.1992(01)
.19,86 (01)
.1995(01)
.1983 (03)
.19,84 (01)
.1986(01)
.1986(04)
.1986 (07)
.1986(10)
.1986(13)
.1987(04)
.1987(07)
.1987(10)
.1987(13)
.1987(16)
1987(19)
1988 (02)
1988 (05)
1988(08)
1988 (11)
1988(14)
1988(18)
1989(03)
1989(06)
1990 (02)
1993 (01)
1984 (02)
1985(02)
-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM
(Continued)
9484.1986(01) 9484.1986(02) 9484.1986(03)
9484.1986(04) 9484.1986(05) 9484.1986(07)
9484.1986(08) 9484.1986(09) 9484.1987(01)
9484.1987(02) 9484.1987(03) 9484.1987(04)
9484.1987(05) 9484.1987(06) 9484.1987(07)
9484.1987(08) 9484.1987(09) 9484.1987(11)
9484.1987(12) 9484.1988(03) 9484.1991(01)
9484.1992(01) 9484.1994(01) 9485.1984(01)
9485.1985(01) 9486.1981(01) 9486.1985(01)
9486.1986(03) 9486.1987(01) 9486.1988(01)
9486.1988(02) 9486.1989(01) 9486.1990(01)
9487.00-1A 9487.00-2A 9487.00-8
9487.00-9 9487.1981(01) 9487.1984(01)
9487.1984(02) 9487.1984(03) 9487.1984(04)
9487.1984(05) 9487.1985(02) 9487.1985(03)
9487.1985(04) 9487.1985(04a) 9487.1985(05)
9487.1985(06) 9487.1985(08) 9487.1985(10)
9487.1986(03) 9487.1986(04) 9487.1986(07)
9487.1986(08) 9487.1986(09) 9487.1986(10)
9487.1986(11) 9487.1986(12) 9487.1986(13)
9487.1986(14) 9487.1987(01) 9487.1988(01)
9487.1993(01) 9487.1995(01) 9488.00-1A
9488.00-2 9488.00-3 9488.1985(03)
9488.1985(04) 9488.1985(07) 9488.1986(03)
9488.1986(04) 9488.1986(05) 9488.1986(06)
9488.1986(10) 9488.1987(01) 9488.1987(03)
9488.1987(04) 9488.1987(09) 9488.1987(10)
9488.1988(01) 9488.1988(02) , 9488.1989(01)
9488.1989(02) 9488.1989(03) 9488.1990(01),
9488.1990(02) 9488.1991(01) 9488.1991(02)
9488.1991(03) 9488.1991(04) . 9488.1991(05)
9488.1992(01) 9488.1992(02)' 9488.1993(01)
9489.00-2 9489.1985(01) 9489.1987(02)
9489.1988(01) 9489.1988(02) 9489.1990(01)
9489.1991(01) 9489.1991(02) 9489.1991(03)
9489.1991(04) 9489.1991(05) 9489.1992(01)
9489.1992(02) 9489.1994(01) 9489.1994(02)
9489.1995(01) 9489.1995(02) 9493.00-1A
9493.1985(01) 9493.1985(02) 9493.1985(03)
-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM
(Continued)
9493.1985(04) 9493.1985(05) 9493.1985(06)
9493.1986(01) 9493.1986(02) 9493.1986(03)
9493.1986(05) 9493.1987(01) 9493.1991(01)
9493.1991(02) 9493.1991(03) 9493.1991(04)
9493.1991(05) 9493.1993(01) 9494.1985(01)
9494.1985(02) 9494.1985(03) 9494.1986(01)
9494.1986(02) 9494.1986(03) 9494.1986(04)
9494.1986(05) 9494.1986(05a) 9494.1986(06)
9494.1987(02) 9494.1987(03) 9494.1991(01)
9494.1991(02) 9494.1991(03) 9494.1991(04)
9494.1992(01) 9494.1993(01) 9494.1994(01)
9494.1994(02) 9494.1994(03) 9495.1985(03)
9495.1986(02) 9495.1986(03) 9495.1986(04)
9495.1986(05) 9495.1986(08) 9495.1986(09)
9495.1986(13) 9495.1986(20) 9495.1986(21)
9495.1986(22) 9495.1986(28) 9495.1986(30)
9495.1987(01) 9495.1987(04) 9495.1987(05)
9495.1987(06) 9495.1988(02) 9495.1989(01)
9495.1989(02) 9495.1990(01) 9495.1990(02)
9495.1991(01) 9495.1994(01) 9496.1990(01)
9496.1991(01) 9496.1993(01) 9496.1994(01)
9497.1986(01) 9497.1986 (Ola) 9497.1986(02)
9497.1987(01) 9497.1987(02) 9497.1987(03)
9497.1989(01) 9497.1989(02) 9497.198-9(03)
9497.199l'(01) 9497.1991(02) 9497.1993(01)
9497.1994(01) 9497.1995(01) 9498.19^2(01)
9498.1992(02) 9498.1993(01) 9498.1993(02)
9498.1993(03) 9498.1993(04) 9498.1994(01)
9498.1994(02) 9498.1994(03) 9498.1994(04)
9498.1994(05) 9498.1994(06) 9498.19?4(07)
9498.1994(08) 9498.1994(09) 9498.1994(10)
9498.1994(11) 9498.1994(12)- 9498.1994(13)
9498.1995(01) 9498.1995(02) 9501.1982(01)
9501.1982(02) 9501.1984(01) 9501.198*5 (01)
9501.1986(01) 9501.1987(01) 9501.1987(02)
9501.1987(03) 9501.1990(01) 9502.00-2
9502.00-3 9502.00-4 9502.00-6
9502.00-7 9502.1984(01) 9502.1985(01)
9502.1985(02) 9502.1985(04) 9502.1985(05)
-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM
(Continued)
9502.1985(06)
9502.1986(Ola)
9502.1986 (04)
9502.1986(07)
9502.1986(10)
9502.1986(14)
9502.1986(17)
9502.1986 (20)
9502.1987 (03)
9502.1987(06)
9502.1987(09)
9502.1988 (02)
9502.1989 (03)
9502.1990 (02)
9502.1992 (02)
9502.1995(01)
9503.1985(01)
9503.1993(01)
9503.52-1A
9504.1985(01)
9504.1987 (02)
9505.1986(01)
9521.1984(01)
9521.1985 (01)
9521.1986 (04)
9521.1986(06a)
9521.1990(01)
9521.1994(01)
9522.1979(01)
9522.1984(02)
9522.1985(01)
9522.1985(04)
9522.1986(01)
9522.1987(01)
9522.1988 (02)
9522.1988(05)
9522.1993(01)
9523.00-12
9523.00-17
9502.1985(09)
9502.1986(02)
9502.1986(05)
9502.1986(07a)
9502.1986(11)
9502.1,986(15)
9502.1986(18)
9502.1987(01)
9502,1987(04)
9502.1987(07)
9502.1987(11)
9502.1989 (01)
9502.1989 (04)
9502.1991(01)
9502.1993 (01)
9502.1995(02)
9503.1985(02)
9503.50-1A
9504.1984(01)
9504.1986(01)
9504.1991(01)
9505.1987(01)
9521.1984(02)
9521.1986(02)
9521.1986(04a)
9521.1987(01)
9521.1991(01)
9522.00-1
9522.1983(02)
9522.1984 (03)
9522.1985 (02)
9522.1985(05)'
9522.1986(02a)
9522.1987(02)
9522.1988 (03)
9522.1990(01)
9522.1993 (02)
9523.00-14
9523.00-18
9502.1986(01)
9502.1986(03)
9502.1986(06)
9502.1986(09)
9502.1986(13)
9502.1986(16)
9502.1986(19)
9502.1987(02)
9502.1987(05)
9502.1987(08)
9502.1988(01)
9502.1989(02)
9502.1990(01)
9502.1992(01)
9502.1994(01)
9502.1995(03)
9503.1991(01)
9503.51-1A
9504.1984(02)
9504.1987(01)
9505.1985(01)
9520.1986(01)
9521.1984(03)
9521.1986(03)
9521.1986(05a)
9521.1988(03)
9521.1991(02)
9522.00-3
9522.1984(01)
9522.1984(04)
9522.1985(03)
9522.1985 (06)
9522.1986(03)
9522.1988(01)
9522.1988 (04)
9522.1992(01)
9523.00-11
9523.00-15
9523.1982(01)
-------
I
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM
(Continued)
9523.1983(02) 9523,1983(03) 9523.1983(06)
9523.1984(01) 9523.1984(02) 9523.1984(03)
9523.1984(04) 9523.1984(06) 9523.1984(07)
9523.1984(08) 9523.1984(10) 9523.1984(11)
9523.1985(01) 9523.1985(02) 9523.1985(05)
9523.1986(01) 9523.1986(02) 9523.1986(03)
9523.1986(04) 9523.1986(05) 9523.1987(02)
9523.1987(03) 9523.1988(01) 9523.1991(01)
9523.1993(01) 9523.1994(01) 9523.50-1A
9524.1983(01) 9524.1984(01) 9524.1984(02)
9524.1985(01) 9524.1986(01) 9524.1988(01)
9524.1989(01) 9524.1989(02) 9524.1989(03)
9524.1994(01) 9525.1982(01) 9525.1984(01)
9525.1985(01) 9525.1986(01) 9525.1986(02)
9525.1986(04) 9525.1986(05) 9525.1986(06)
9525.1986(07) 9525.1988(01) 9525.1988(02)
9525.1989(01) 9525.1990(01) 9525.1990(02)
9527.1985(01) 9527.1986(01) 9527.1986(02)
9527.1987(02) 9527.1988(03) 9527.1992(01)
9527.1993(01) 9528.00-1 9528.1982(01)
9528.1982(02) 9528.1983(01) 9528.1983(03)
9528.1984(01) 9528.1985(01) 9528.1985(02)
9528.1985(03) 9528.1985(04) ' 9528.1985(05)
9528.1985(09) 9528.1985(11) 9528.1986(01)
9528.1986(03) 9528.1986(04) 9528.1986(06)
9528.1986(07) 9528.1986(08) 9528.1986(09)
9528.1986(10) 9528.1986(11) 9528.1987(01)
9528.1987(02) 9528.1987(03) 9528.1987(04)
9528.1987(09) 9528.1987(10) 9528.1987(12)
9528.1987(14) 9528.1987(15) 9528.1987(16)
9528.1988(02) 9528.1988(03) 9528.1988(05)
9528.1988(06) 9528.1989(11)' 9528.1989(13)
9528.1990(01) 9528.1990(02) 9528.1990(03)
9528.1991(01) 9528.1991(02) 9528.1991(03)
9528.1992(01) 9528.1992(02) 9531.1993(01)
9534.1991(01) 9541.00-6 9541.1982(01)
9541.1984(04) 9541.1984(05) 9541.1984(08)
9541.1984(09) 9541.1985(01) 9541.1985(05)
9541.1985(07) 9541.1985(09) 9541.1986(04)
-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM
(Continued)
9541.1986(05)
9541.1986(14)
9541.1986(24)
9541.1987(10)
9542.1980(01)
9542.1980(04)
9542.1981(02)
9542.1982 (03)
9543.00-1
9551.1986(03)
9551.1986(11)
9551.1986(22)
9551.1987(01)
9551.1987(06)
9551.1987(10)
9551.1987(14)
9551.1987 (20)
9551.1987(23)
9551.1988(02)
9551.1988(05)
9551.1988(09)
9551.1988 (13)
9551.1989(01)
9551.1989(04)
9551.1990(01)
9551.1990 (04)
9551.1990(07)
9551.1990(10)
9551.1990(13)
9551.1990(16)
9551.1991(03)
9551.1991(06)
9551.1991(09)
9551.1991(12)
9551.1991(15)
9551.1993(01)
9551.1993(04)
9551.1995(01)
9553.1986(04)
9541.1986(10)
9541.1986 (19)
9541.1987(01)
9541.1988(01)
9542-.1980(02)
9542.1980(05)
9542.1982(01)
9542.1983(01) .
9543.1984(01)
9551.1986(07)
9551.1986(15)
9551.1986(23)
9551.1987(04)
9551.1987(07)
9551.1987(12)
9551.1987(16)
9551.1987(21)
9551.1987(24)
9551.1988(03)
9551.1988(07)
9551.1988(10)
9551.1988 (14)
9551.1989(02)
9551.1989(05)
9551.1990 (02)
9551.1990 (05)
9551.1990(08)
9551.1990 (11)
9551.1990(14)
9551.1991(01)
9551.1991(04)
9551.1991(07)'
9551.1991(10)
9551.1991(13)
9551.1992(01)
9551.1993(02)
9551.1994(01)
9553.1986(02)
9553.1987(01)
9541.1986(13)
9541.1986 (20)
9541.1987(04)
9541.1991(01)
9542.1980(03)
9542.1981(01)
9542.1982 (02).
9542.1985(01)
9551.01-01
9551.1986(08)
9551.1986(19)
9551.1986(24)
9551.1987(05)
9551.1987(09)
9551.1987(13)
9551.1987(19)
9551.1987(22)
9551.1988(01)
9551.1988(04)
9551.1988(08)
9551.1988(12)
9551.1988(15)
9551.1989(03)
9551.1989(06)
9551.1990 (03)
9551.1990(06)
9551.1990 (09)
9551.1990(12)
9551.1990(15)
9551.1991 (.02)
9551.1991(05)
9551.1991(08)
9551.1991(11)
9551.1991(14)
9551.1992(02)
9551.1993(03)
9551.1994(02)
9553.1986 (03)
9553.1987(02)
-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM
(Continued)
9553.1987(03}
9553.1987(11)
9553.1987(13a)
9553.1987(16)
9553.1989(01)
9553.1993 (01)
9554.1986(03)
9554.1987(02)
9554.1988(04)
9554.1989(03)
9554.1990(01)
9554.1990(04)
9554.1990(07)
9554.1990(10)
9554.1990(13)
9554.1991(01)
9554.1991(04)
9554.1993(01)
9554.1994(02)
9554.1994(05)
9554.1995(02)
9560.1985(01)
9561.1995(01)
9571.1987(01)
9571.1990(01)
9571.1990(04)
9571.1993(02)
9572.1988(03)
9573.1987(01)
9573.1991(01)
9574,00-02
9574.1991(01)
9592.1992(01)
9592.1993 (02)
9592.1993(05)
9592.1993 (08)
9592.1994(02)
9592.1994(05)
9592.1994(08)
9553.1987(07)
9553.1987(12)
9553.1987(14)
9553.1988(01)
9553.1989(02)
9553.1994(01)
9554.1986(04)
9554.1987(03)
9554.1988(05)
9554.1989(04)
9554.1990(02)
9554.1990 (05)
9554.1990(08)
9554.1990(11)
9554.1990 (14)
9554.1991(02)
9554.1992(01)
9554.1993 (02)
9554.1994 (03)
9554.1994(06)
9555.00-01
9561.1994 (01)
9571.1985(01)
9571.1989(01)
9571.1990 (02)
9571.1990 (05)
9572.00-02
9573.00-01
9573.1990 (01)
9573.1994(01)
9574.1985(01)
9581.1988 (01)'
9592.1992 (02)
9592.1993 (03)
9592.1993 (06)
9592.1993 (09)
9592.1994 (03)
9592.1994(06)
9592.1994(09)
9553.1987(09)
9553.1987(13)
9553.1987(15)
9553.1988(02)
9553.1990(01)
9554.1986(01)
9554.1986(05)
9554.1988(03)
'9554.1989 (02)
9554.1989(05)
9554.1990 (03)
9554.1990(06)
9554.1990 (09)
9554.1990 (12)
9554.1990(15)
9554.1991(03)
9554.1992 (02)
9554.1994(01)
9554.1994(04)
9554.1995(01)
9555.1987(01)
9561.1994(02)
9571.1986(04)
9571.1989(02)
9571.1990(03)
9571.1993(01)
9572.1986(01)
9573.1986(01)
9573.1990(02)
9574.00-01
9574.1990(01)
9592.1988 (01)
9592.1993(01)
9592.1993 (04)
9592.1993(07)
9592.1994(01)
9592.1994 (04)
9592.1994 (07)
9592.1994(10)
-------
LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONTAINED IN THE
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM
(Continued)
9592.1994(11) 9592.1994(12) 9592.1995(01)
9592.1995(02) 9593.1995(01)
-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
-------
Revised
Covers and Spines
Replace the June 1995
IRA Permit Policy Compend
covers and spines with the
attached covers and spines
-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
-------
Volume 1
Revised
Replace the entire
June 1995
Volume 1 (including user's
guide and index) with the
attached revised Volume 1
(New disks containing the revised index are
also included to replace the old dBase file)
-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
-------
RCRA PERMIT POLICY
COMPENDIUM
User's Guide
-------
!!»';,„ .T,; ' •;-
-------
RCRA PERMIT POLICY COMPENDIUM USER'S GUIDE
OVERVIEW
The T?rE A Permit Policy Compendium is a reference for Regional and State permit waters
which consists of Headquarters' permitting policies and procedures. The Compendium
volumes include this Users' Guide, a key word index, and reference memoranda, letters,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER) Directives, and other documents
organized chronologically within subject categories.
The Compendium was originally compiled in late 1985. This updated Compendium includes
documents issued through December 31, 1995.
For these compilations, the files of EPA Headquarters Office of Solid Waste Divisions and
Branches were reviewed to identify memoranda, letters, directives, and other documents that
set forth policies and interpretations relevant to the RCRA permit program. The documents
identified as relevant were then organized, according to a system based on the structure of the
OSWER Directives System. Each document is assigned an unique number which both
categorizes the document by general topic area and identifies the year in which the document
was written. The numbering system uses the same basic categories as the OSWuR Directives
System.
K-F VWORD INDEX
A key word index is included in Volume 1 to assist the user in identifying and locating
relevant documents. The index, organized in alphabetical order, lists the topic and the
documents which are relevant to the topic, identified by title, document number and date. The
key word index groups related topics and cross references topics which may be relevant.
Subkey words have been identified as a means to specify groups of titles which may fall within
a broader key word category.
Summaries of documents which had been included in the original Compendium have been
deleted. Users of the original Compendium did not find them useful.
After a key word listing, there may be a "See " or "See also ." In the "See "
case the documents relating to the key word have been grouped into another listing. For
example the listing for "Absorbents" refers the user to "Liquid Waste." Similarly, the listing
for "Appeal" refers the reader to "Permit Process," but also reminds the user to "See also
'Closure'", since appeals of closure plans also may be relevant.
-1-
-------
M method to search for a specific memo, diskettes with the key word index on
dBase m Plus have been included in this package. Additional information on loading
indexing, and searching in this database can be found in Appendix I.
DOCUMENTS iNcrjTPFn
The Compendium incorporates a wide variety of documents that may be useful to staff
working in the field of RCRA permitting. The Compendium includes relevant RCRA
f em°randa'/!ftters' OSWER Directives, Regulatory Interpretive Letters (RILs)
suS (dU^ineS^>IGS' RCRA Reauthoriz*™ Statutory Interpret to
cfZ^T d^me^yStotasRe^
^ Comments. Although the Compendium includes RILs, PIGs, RSIs, and PATs
from the previous years, the Office of Solid Waste no longer issues these documents.
Documents that are internal Headquarters correspondence or express preliminary thoughts
"^ ^
f '
interpretation of Agency policy or procedures have been compiled
those documeing a dear
RCRA Permit Policy Compendium volumes include this Users' Guide, a key word index
and memoranda, letters, and other documents organized chronologically within subject
? lnClUde *" d°CUmentS iSSU6d thr°Ugh December 31. 1995.
documents in any section. They are ordered chronologically
There are 13 volumes in this reference document:
^
Document Reference NnmhPrg
Broad Subject
nAnn n
2 - 9420.1980-9441.1984
_ njj
3 - 9441.1985-9441,1989
4 - 9441.1990-9441.1995
5 - 9442.1980-9444.1986
6 - 9444.1987-9457.1995
User's Guide, Key Word Index
Hazardous Waste Management System,
Identification and Listing of Hazardous' Waste
Identification and ListtaJ of Hazardou! IwaS
(cont'd) .
Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste
(cont'd)
Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste
(cont'd)
Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste
(cont'd), Generator Standards
-2-
-------
8
9
9460.1980-9482.1995
9483.1980-9486.1986
9486.1987-9498.1995
10 - 9500.1980-9522.1995
11 - 9523.1980-9528.1995
12 - 9530.1980-9551.1991
13
9551.1992-9593.1995
Transporters Standards, TSDF Administrative
Requirements, TSDF Technical Requirements
TSDF Technical Requirements (cont'd)
TSDF Technical Requirements (cont'd),
Management of Specific Hazardous Wastes
Permitting Policies, Permitting Procedures
Permitting Procedures (cont'd)
Air Emissions, State Authorization, Land Disposal
Restrictions
Land Disposal Restrictions (cont'd), Waste
Minimization, Subtitle D, RCRA Grant Funds,
Miscellaneous
NUMBERING SYSTEM
All source documents are identified by a reference number in the upper right hand corner of
the page. The document reference number is also in the key word index. This reference
numbering system is designed to be consistent with the Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response (OSWER) Directives System which generally follows the organizational structure of
the Code of Federal Regulations.
Each document reference number consists of four digits preceding a decimal point and
additional alpha/numeric characters following the decimal point. The basic form used for
numbering the Compendium documents is illustrated below:
9999.1986(09)
9999 = Subject category number
1986 = Year document was issued
(09) = Chronological number within the year of issue and the subject category.
This document would be the ninth document of 1986 in the subject category 9999.
Subject Category Prefix
The first four digits of the document reference number indicate the subject category
into which the document has been classified, based on the structure of the RCRA
regulations including Subtitles C, D and J. Each subject category refers to a subsection
of the RCRA regulations or relevant statutory issue (such as Waste Minimization).
Thus, a document is assigned a four digit category number based on the sub-section of
-3-
-------
the regulations or the issue which is addressed in the document. Appendix H of this
Users' Guide lists the subject category numbers and identifies, if appropriate, the 40
CFR Part or Subpart associated with each number. As demonstrated in Appendix H
there are a number of sections within the OSWER Directives that are "Reserved." '
These sections correspond to regulations which do not exist at this time.
All documents assigned to the same category are located together in the reference
volumes under the appropriate category number. Within each subject category,
documents are ordered chronologically.
Document Specific Suffix
The alpha/numeric characters found after the decimal point in the document reference
number indicate the year and, within that year, the chronological order in which the
document was issued.
ADDENDUM DOCUMENTS
Included in each update is a series of addendum* to the Compendium. These documents are
the reference materials which have been produced since the last update. They should be
inserted in the back of the appropriate section of the Compendium.
DELETED REFERENCE DOCUMENTS AND STTMMAPTPg
Since the original compilation of the Compendium, a number of documents have been deleted
because they are now out-of-date or they were replaced by a more recent document As a
result, there are some gaps in the chronological numbering sequence of the documents and
summaries.
INSERTED REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
Since the original compilation of the Compendium, a number of documents have been
identified as missing from the Compendium. As these documents are identified they will be
included in the next Compendium Update. They should be inserted into their appropriate
location within the Compendium
-4-
-------
LOCATING INFORMATION
The Compendium is a reference tool that can be used in two ways, depending on the needs of
the user. Information may be found referring to individual subject category sections or by
using the key word index.
In reviewing individual subject categories, the user will find all of the documents concerning a
specific subject. Alternatively, by referring to the key word index, the user may locate the
exact document of interest without reviewing all of the documents hi the category. As noted
earlier, the key word index also serves to remind the user of other topics which may be
relevant to the particular issue hi question. Appendix m contains the list of available key
word and subkey words located hi the key word index.
Asterisks
The document titles preceded by an asterisk in the key word index are the
RCRA/Superfund Hotline Monthly summaries. They are marked with an asterisk to
clearly differentiate them from the letters and memoranda.
-5-
-------
DISCLAIMER
The compilation of documents in this Compendium, as well as the policies, procedures and
interpretations outlined in the documents themselves, is intended solely for the guidance of
employees of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. - This compilation may not include
all documents discussing Agency views on particular subjects. In addition, these documents
are not intended and cannot be relied upon to create any rights, substantive or procedural,
enforceable by any party in litigation with the United States. The views expressed in these
documents do not necessarily reflect the current position of the Agency, and EPA reserves the
right to act at variance with these views or to change them at any time without public notice.
-6-
-------
APPENDIX I
Loading, Indexing and Searching
in dBase III Plus
-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
-------
Loading and Using the Key Word Index on dBase lH Plus
The key word index has been divided into two database files due to size. These files should be
merged and saved on the computer hard drive to allow the entire document to be indexed and
searched. The following instructions will allow the user to load, retrieve, and merge the files
together and save the files as one file on the computer hard drive.
Loading
Insert the disk labelled COMP2.DBF into the disk drive.
At the prompt, type:
copy [source drive] COMP2.DBF to [target drive\target directory]
Enter dBase ffl+. Typically; this is done by typing either "dBase" or "db" at the prompt.
The dBase m+ system will display a copyright screen and then prompt the user to continue by
pressing the [ENTER] key. The default drive and directory must now be set to retrieve the
COMP2.DBF file. —
Retrieving
1. Press the [ESC] key at the dBase ffl+ menu to access the dBase dot prompt.
2. Set the default drive and directory: at the dot prompt, type
set directory to [default drive]\[default directory]
3. Retrieve the COMP2.DBF file: at the dot prompt, type
use comp2.dbf
The COMP2.DBF file has now been retrieved and is currently open. The COMP1.DBF file
must now be merged with the COMP2.DBF file.
-1-
-------
Merging
1. Merge the COMP1.DBF file with the COMP2.DBF file: at the dot prompt, type
append from [source drive] compl.dbf
The APPEND command adds the records in the COMP1.DBF file to the COMP2.DBF file
Thus, COMP2.DBF becomes the file name for the entire key word index located on the
default hard driveXdirectory. The key word index file (COMP2.DBF) can now be indexed or
searched in its entirety.
i ' i
•
Indexing
dBase ffl+ is a management system which allows the user to organize and manipulate data
When the COMP2.DBF file is retrieved without indexing, the data records are in the same
order in which the data were originally entered or appended. To readily manipulate the data
the file must be indexed. The following instructions will index the file as it appears in the key
1. Index the COMP2.DBF file: at the dot prompt, type
index on substr(KEYWOED,l,25)+
substr(SUBKEYWORD, 1,25)+
substr(TITLE,l,30) to KEY.NDX
The COMP2.DBF file will index to 100% and an index file (KEY NDX) will be
created.
2. Press the [F2] key to return to the dBase m+ menu.
The COMP2.DBF file is now indexed and the user can browse through the file in the manner
in which it is presented in Volume 1.
-2-
-------
Searching
dBase EH- allows the user to search for particular data elements within a file. Therefore, if
the user knows the date of a memo, the COMP2.DBF file can be searched for all of the
memos written on that specific date. Searches can be conducted for each of the data fields
within COMP2.DBF (e.g., KEYWORD, SUBKEYWORD, IDNUMBER, TITLE and
DOCDATE). The following instructions indicate how to search for specific documents.
1. Highlight RETRIEVE option from the dBase m + menu
2. Select DISPLAY
3. Select BUILD A SEARCH CONDITION
4. Select a COMP2.DBF file Field Name: options include KEYWORD,
SUBKEYWORD, IDNUMBER, TITLE, and DOCDATE (e.g., select DOCDATE)
5 Select a logical operator: options include = EQUAL TO, < =LESS THAN OR
EQUAL TO, GREATER THAN, > =GREATER THAN OR
EQUAL TO, and 0NOT EQUAL TO (e.g., select =EQUAL TO)
6. At the prompt, enter a search value (e.g., enter 10/02/91)
7. Select a logical operator for the FOR clause: options include NO MORE
CONDITIONS, COMBINE WITH .AND., and COMBINE WITH .OR. (e.g., select
NO MORE CONDITIONS)
8. Select EXECUTE COMMAND
The system will now display the record numbers and the associated data for each document
dated 10/02/91.
For more information on data manipulation, indexing, and searching, consult a dBase HI+
Reference Book.
-3-
-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
-------
APPENDIX II
Subject Category Numbering System
-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
-------
9400.00 GENERAL OSW POLICY AND PROCEDURES
9410.00 RESERVED
9420.00 RESERVED
9430.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (Part 260)
9431.00 GENERAL (Subpart A)
9432.00 DEFINITIONS (Subpart B)
9433.00 RULEMAKING PETITIONS (Subpart C)
9434.00 OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES
9435.00- RESERVED
9439.00
9440.00 IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
(Part 261)
9441 00 GENERAL (Subpart A)
9442 00 CRITERIA FOR IDENTIFYING THE CHARACTERISTICS OF
HAZARDOUS WASTE AND LISTING HAZARDOUS WASTES
(Subpart B)
9443.00 CHARACTERISTICS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
(Subpart C)
9444.00 LISTS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE (Subpart D)
9445.00 APPENDICES
9446.00- RESERVED
9449.00
9450.00 GENERATOR STANDARDS (Part 262)
9451.00 GENERAL (Subpart A)
9452.00 MANIFEST (Subpart B)
9453.00 PRE-TRANSPORT REQUIREMENTS (Subpart C)
9454.00 RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING (Subpart D)
9455.00 EXPORTS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE (Subpart E)
9456.00 IMPORTS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE (Subpart F)
9457.00- RESERVED
9459.00
-1-
-------
•ll'I'Ji'ilii ' ' i«l,, '!
'"'.-Mil..!: PIC 111
•ML ""'"'' r
•lii'dil", "i. "'I " :;:.«""!|*!|i"T
9460.00
9461.00
9462.00
11 ' 'i,
9463.o|
9464,Qp-
9469.00
9470.00
9471.00
9472.00
9473.00
9474.00
9475.00
9476.00
9477.00
9478.00-
9479.00
9480.00
9481.00
9482.00
9483.00
9484.00
9485.00
9486.00
9487.00 -
9488.00
9489.00
TRANSPORTER STANDARDS (Part 263)
GENERAL STANDARDS (Subpart A)
COMPLIANCE WITH THE MANIFEST,
RECORDKEEPING, AND REPORTING (Subpart B)
HAZARDOUS WASTE DISCHARGES (Subpart C)
RESERVED
TSDF ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS (Parts 264 and 265)
GENERAL (Subpart A)
GENERAL FACILITY STANDARDS (Subpart B)
PREPAREDNESS AND PREVENTION (Subpart C)
CONTINGENCY PLAN AND EMERGENCY
PROCEDURES (Subpart D)
MANIFEST SYSTEM, RECORDKEEPING AND
REPORTING (Subpart E)
CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE (Subpart G)
FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS
(Subpart H)
RESERVED
",! '"', i '
TSDF TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS (Parts 264 and 265)
GROUND WATER PROTECTION STANDARDS
(Subpart F)
CONTAINERS (Subpart I)
TANKS (Subpart J)
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS (Subpart K)
WASTE PILES (Subpart L)
LAND TREATMENT (Subpart M)
LANDFILLS (Subpart N)
INCINERATORS (Subpart 0)
MISCELLANEOUS UNITS (Part 264, Subpart X, Part 265,
Subparts P, Q and R)
-2-
-------
9490 00 STANDARDS FOR MANAGING SPECIFIC HAZARDOUS WASTES
AND SPECIFIC TYPES OF FACILITIES (Part 266)
9491.00 SUBPART A (RESERVED)
949200 SUBPART B (RESERVED)
9493.00 RECYCLABLE MATERIALS USED IN A MANNER
CONSTITUTING DISPOSAL (Subpart C)
9494.00 HAZARDOUS WASTE BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
(Subpart D)
9495 00 USED OIL BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY (Subpart E)
9496.00 RECYCLABLE MATERIALS USED FOR PRECIOUS METAL
RECOVERY (Subpart F)
9497.00 SPENT LEAD-ACID BATTERIES BEING RECLAIMED
(Subpart G)
9498.00 BOILERS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES (Subpart H)
9499.00 RESERVED
9500.00 PERMITTING POLICIES
9501.00 PERMITTING PRIORITIES
9502.00 CORRECTIVE ACTION
9503.00 SPECIAL PERMITTING UNIVERSE
9504 00 COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT
9505'.00 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN PERMITTING ACTIVITIES
9506.00- RESERVED
9509.00
9510.00 RESERVED
9520.00 PERMITTING PROCEDURES (Parts 124 and 270)
9521.00 GENERAL PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS (Part 124, Subpart A)
9522.00 GENERAL INFORMATION (Part 270, Subpart A)
9523.00 PERMIT APPLICATION (Part 270, Subpart B)
9524.00 PERMIT CONDITIONS (Part 270, Subpart C)
9525 00 CHANGES TO PERMITS (Part 270, Subpart D)
9526.00 EXPIRATION AND CONTINUATION OF PERMITS (Part 270,
Subpart E)
9527.00 SPECIAL FORMS OF PERMITS (Part 270, Subpart F)
9528.00 INTERIM STATUS (Part 270, Subpart G)
9529.00 RESERVED
-3-
-------
'9'
° AIR EMISSION STANDARDS FOR OWNERS AND OPERATORS
OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TSDFs
9531,00 GENERAL (Subpart A)
9532.00 RESERVED
9533.00 RESERVED
9534.00 EQUIPMENT LEAKS AND PROCESS VENTS (Subpart C)
9535.00- RESERVED
9539.00
9540.00 STATE AUTHORIZATION (Part 271)
9541,00 FINAL AUTHORIZATION (Subpart A)
9542.00 INTERIM AUTHORIZATION (Subpart B)
9543.00 ASSESSMENT OF STATE CAPABILITIES
9544.00- RESERVED
9549.00
: I. • '(
i:
9550.00 LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS (Part 268)
;• ; i" ; . ••' • '. ': ' • • ' || ;
9551.00 GENERAL (Subpart A)
9552.00 RESERVED
9553.00 PROHmmON ON LAND DISPOSAL WASTE SPECIFIC
PROHIBITIONS GROUP (Subpart C)
9554.00 TREATMENT STANDARDS (Subpart D)
9555.00 PROHIBITIONS ON STORAGE (Subpart E)
9556.00- RESERVED
9559.00
,i .1 - if
9560.00 WASTE MINIMIZATION
i • i „ •• • . • ,„ • < n. '
9561.00 POLICY STATEMENTS
9562.QO- RESERVED
9569.00
9570.00 SUBTITLE D
9571.00 MINING WASTES
9572.00 STATE PROGRAMS
9573.00 MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTION
9574.00 HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE
: : ' ' -4- !
-------
9575.00- RESERVED
9579.00
9580.00 ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTIVES
9581.00 RCRA GRANT FUNDS
9582.00 CORRESPONDENCE
9583.00- RESERVED
9589.00
9590.00 MISCELLANEOUS
9591.00 MEDICAL WASTE (Subtitle J)
9592.00 USED OIL (Part 279)
9593.00 UNIVERSAL WASTES (Part 273)
9594.00- RESERVED
9599.00
-5-
-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
-------
APPENDIX III
List of Key Words and Subkey Words
-------
.1. it IF'"
This Page IntentionaUy Left Blank
:.. (til!; ' ."t
Mil,; „ •;
•. fii ' .
I ; - , •"
-------
KEY WORD LIST
ABSORBENTS (see Liquid Waste)
ACCUMULATION (see Generators; see also Tank System)
ACL (see Alternate Concentration Limit, Groundwater Monitoring)
ACTIVE INGREDIENT (see Listed Hazardous Waste under Sole Active Ingredient)
ACTIVE/INACTIVE FACILITY (see Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities)
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER (see Enforcement, Corrective Action)
AEROSOL CANS (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
AGRICULTURAL WASTE (see also Exclusions)
• FIFRA
• Pesticides
AIR EMISSIONS
AIRBAGINFLATORS (see Listed Hazardous Waste under Commercial Chemical Products)
ALTERNATE CONCENTRATION LIMIT (ACL) (see Groundwater Monitoring; see also
Appendix VHI)
ANALYTIC METHODS (see also Appendix VIE, Appendix IX, SW-846)
• Detection Limits
• Laboratory Analysis
• Sample Analysis
• Sampling
• Sampling Plan
ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT (see Tank System)
API SEPARATOR SLUDGE (see also Petroleum Refinery Wastes, Sludge, Wastewater)
APPEALS (see Permit Process; see also Closure Process)
APPENDDC DC (see also Appendix VDI, Groundwater Monitoring)
• Skinner List
APPENDDC Vffl (see also ACL, Analytic Methods, Appendix DC, Groundwater Monitoring,
Hazardous Constituents, Sampling)
AQUEOUS WASTE (see Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
AQUIFER (see Groundwater Monitoring)
ASBESTOS (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
ASSESSMENT MONITORING (see Groundwater Monitoring)
ATOMIC ENERGY ACT (AEA) (see Mixed Waste)
AUTHORIZED STATES (see State Authorization)
BAGHOUSE DUST (see Incineration, Sludge, Scrubber)
BALLAST FLUID (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
BATTERIES (see Solid Waste, Hazardous Waste Identification)
SUBKEYWORD
ATK1/WPDISK44R
-------
, , , ,i
BDAT (see Best Demonstrated Available Technology, Land Disposal Restrictions)
BEST DEMONSTRATED AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY (BOAT) (see Land Disposal
Restrictions) ;
BEVILL EXCLUSION (AMENDMENT) (see Mining Waste under Bevill Amendment)
BIENNIAL REPORTS (see Generators)
BIF RULE (see Incineration)
BDFs (see Boiler and Industrial Furnaces)
BIOLOGICAL-TREATMENT (see Treatment)
BLASTING CAPS (see Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
BLENDING AND BURNING (see Burning and Blending)
BOILER (see Incineration)
BOILERS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES (BEFs)
• Continuous Emissions Monitors
• Performance Standards
• Shfm Recycling
BOILER SLAG (see Mining Waste)
BOND RATINGS (see Financial Responsibility)
BULK LIQUIDS (see Land Disposal Restrictions, Liquid Waste)
BURNING AND BLENDING (see also Incineration, Used Oil)
• Burning Hazardous Waste Fuel
BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL (see Burning and Blending)
BY-PRODUCT (see Solid Waste, Mixed Waste)
CALIFORNIA LIST (see Land Disposal Restrictions)
CAPABILITY ASSESSMENTS (see State Authorization)
CAPACITY (see Siting)
CARBON FILTERS (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
CASE-BY-CASE EXTENSION (see Land Disposal Restrictions)
CEMENT KILN (see Incineration; see also Hazardous Waste Fuels)
CEMs (see Continuous Emissions Monitors)
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) (see RCRA/CERCLA Interface)
CERCLA/RCRA INTERFACE (see RCRA/CERCLA Interface)
CERTIFICATION (see also Closure, Generators, Post-Closure, Waste Minimization)
CHANGE DURING INTERIM STATUS (see Interim Status Process)
CHANGING FEDERAL REGULATIONS (see state Authorization)
CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE (see also SW-846, Listed Hazardous Waste,
Hazardous Waste Identification)
• Aqueous Waste
• Blasting Caps
• Corrosive Wastes
SUBKEYWORD 2
: ii ATK1/WPDISK44R
-------
• Dilution
• EPToxiciry
• Explosive Wastes .
• Flammable
• Ignitability
• Lead
• Reactive Wastes
• TCLP
• Toxicity
CHEMICAL DEODORANTS (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
CHEMICAL STABILIZATION (see Treatment)
CHLORINATION TANK (see Listed Hazardous Waste)
CHROMIUM (see Exclusions)
CIVIL ENFORCEMENT (see Enforcement; see also Compliance)
CLEAN AIR ACT (see also Incineration, Used Oil, TSDFs)
CLEAN CLOSURE (see Closure Process)
CLEAN WATER ACT (see also Exclusions)
• NPDES Facilities
• Wastewater
CLEANUP STANDARDS (see Corrective Action)
CLOSURE (see Interim Status Process)
CLOSURE PLAN (see Closure Process)
CLOSURE PROCESS (see also Interim Status Process, Post-Closure, TSDFs)
• Clean Closure ,
• Closure Plan
• Closure Requirements
• Closure Standards
• Partial Closure
• Permitting
• Public Participation
CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS (see Closure Process)
CLOSURE STANDARDS (see Closure Process)
COAL (See Mining Waste)
COAL TAR/COKE (see also Hazardous Waste Fuels)
COLLECTION PROGRAMS (see Household Hazardous Waste)
COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS (see Listed Hazardous Waste)
COMPATIBILITY (see also Containers, Liners, Minimum Technological Requirements,
Tank System)
COMPLIANCE (see also Enforcement, Interim Status Process)
SUBKEYWORD 3
ATKl/WP DISK 44R
-------
,
• Inspections
CQMpiJANCE MONITORING (see Groundwater Monitoring)
£8iS^^ SCHEDULES (see also Corrective Action, Enforcement, State Authorization)
COMPRESSlp (|AS CYLINDERS (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
CONSTRUCTION (see also Interim Status Process)
. ;';,"',, •' NejvUnit ' ".' ." ' .' '.,,,'. , . „ ;
CONTAINED-IN (see also Hazardous Waste Identification)
CONTAINERS
• Empty
CONTAINMENT (see Secondary Containment)
CONTAINMENT BUILDINGS
CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER (see Hazardous Waste Identification, Corrective
Action)
CONTAMINATED MEDIA (see Hazardous Waste Identification Rule)
CONTAMINATED SOIL (see Hazardous Waste Identification, Corrective Action)
CONTINGENCY PLAN
• Spills
CQNTIMUING RELEASES (see Corrective Action)
CONTINUOUS, EMISSIONS MONITORS (see Boilers and Industiral Furnaces)
CORPORATE GUARANTEE (see Financial Responsibility)
CORRECTIVE ACTION(see also Groundwater Monitoring,
Enforcement, Interim Status Process, Permit Conditions)
Administrative Order
Cleanup Standards
Contaminated Groundwater
Contaminated Soil
Continuing Releases
Corrective Action Management Unit
RCRA Facility Assessment (RFA)
Regulated Unit
Release
Remediation
Solid Waste Management Units (SWMUs)
Voluntary Cleanups
E ACJTON MANAGEMENT UNIT (See Corrective Action)
CORROSIVE WASTES (see Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
COST (see Financial Responsibility)
COST ESTIMATES (see Financial Responsibility)
COVER DESIGN (see Final Cover)
SUBKEY WORD
;,,,,, . 4
ATKl/WP DISK 44R
-------
CREOSOTE (see Wood Treatment, Hazardous Waste Identification)
CYANIDE (see Hazardous Waste Identification; see also SW-846)
DATA
• Noncompliance
DE MINIMIS (see also Listed Hazardous Waste)
DEADLINES (see Permit Process; see also State Authorization)
DEFINITION (see Solid Waste, Hazardous Waste Identification, Listed Hazardous Waste,
Regulated Unit, Treatment)
DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY (see Permit Process)
DELISTING (see also Appendix Vffl, Appendix K, Hazardous Waste Identification,
Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
• Temporary Exclusion
• VHS Model
DENIAL (see Permit Process under Permit Denial)
DENTAL AMALGAM (see Scrap Metal)
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE (DOD) (see Federal Facilities)
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE) (see Federal Facilities; see also Mixed Waste)
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT) (see Generators, Transporters)
DERIVED-FROM RULE (see also Mixture Rule)
• Residue
DESTRUCTION REMOVAL EFFICIENCY (DRE) (see Incineration)
DETECTION LIMITS (see Analytic Methods)
DETECTION MONITORING (see Groundwater Monitoring)
DffiUTYLIN DIFLUORIDE (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
DILUTION (see Characteristic Hazardous Waste; see also Land Disposal Restrictions)
DIOXIN (see also Listed Hazardous Waste, Land Disposal Restrictions, RCRA/CERCLA
Interface)
DISCARDED MATERIALS (see Solid Waste; see also Land Disposal
Restrictions, RCRA/CERCLA Interface)
DISCHARGE (see Wastewater; see also Spills)
DISPOSAL (see also Land Disposal Facilities, Land Disposal Restrictions, Recycle, TSDFs)
DO-IT-YOURSELFERS (DIYERS) (see Used Oil)
DOD (see Department of Defense, Federal Facilities)
DOE (see Department of Energy, Federal Facilities)
DOT (see Department of Transportation, Generators; see also Transporters
DOUBLE LINER (see Minimum Technological Requirements)
DRE (see Incineration under Destruction Removal Efficiency)
DREDGED SEDIMENTS (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
DRILLING FLUIDS (see Energy Exploration Wastes)
SUBKEYWORD 5
ATK1/WPDISK44R
-------
WATER- ..; , , ,., ,... ;. , . , ,
DR|PPADS
DRUM SHREDDING UNIT (see Treatment)
DUST
DlSsf SUPPRESSION (see also HSWA, Disposal, Used Oil)
ELECTRIC ARC FUJINACE (see Hazardous Waste Identification, Incineration)
ELECTROPLATING (see also Listed Hazardous Waste, Solvents)
* Pickle Liquor
• Zinc Plating
ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION UNITS (see Exclusions)
.EMERGENCY PERMIT , , , ' . \
''EMISSION cgNf|oL WASJES (see siudge)
EMPTY (see Containers, Tank System)
ENERGY EXPLORATION WASTES (see also Mining Waste)
• Drilling Fluids
ENFORCEMENT (see also Compliance)
• Administrative Order
• Civil Enforcement
• Enforcement Action
ENFORCEMENT ACTION (see Enforcement)
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS
EPTQXICITY (see Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
EPA.I.D. NUMBER (see also Generators, Transporters, TSDFs, Notification)
• Identification
• Identification Numbers
EQUIVALENCY (see Test Methods)
EXCLUSIONS (see also Agricultural Waste, Hazardous Waste Identification, Recycle, Solid
Waste, Wastewater)
• Chromium
• Elementary Neutralization Units
• Exemption
• Filter Press
• Fossil Fuels
• Gaseous Emissions
• Mining Waste
• Totally Enclosed Treatment Units
EXEMPTION(see Exclusions)
EXgANSION§ (see Permit Conditions; see also Interim Status Process)
J^ 1^ASTE
-------
EXPLOSIVE WASTES (see Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
EXPORT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE (see also Transporters, Manifest)
EXPOSURE INFORMATION (see Risk Assessment)
EXTENSION (see also Land Disposal Restrictions)
F-WASTES (see Listed Hazardous Waste, Hazardous Waste Identification, Regulated Unit)
FACILITY (see TSDFs)
FACILITY MANAGEMENT PLAN
FEDERAL FACILITIES
• DOD
• DOE
• Inventory
• Open Burning/Open Detonation (OB/OD)
FERROUS METALS (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
FIFRA (see Agricultural Waste)
FILTER PRESS (see Exclusions)
FINAL COVER (see also Closure)
FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (see also Closure Process, Post-Closure)
• Bond Ratings
• Corporate Guarantee
• Cost
• Cost Estimates
• Insurance
• Liability
Liability Coverage
FLAMMABLE (see Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT
FOOD PROCESSING WASTE (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
FORMALDEHYDE (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
FOSSIL FUELS (see Mining Waste, Exclusions)
FREE LIQUIDS (see Land Disposal Restrictions, Paint Filter Test; see also SW-846)
FREON (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
FUEL (see Hazardous Waste Fuels, Used Oil)
FURNACE (see Incineration)
GAS CONDENSATE (see Land Disposal Facilities)
GAS PROCESSING WASTES
GASEOUS EMISSIONS (see Exclusions)
GENERATORS (see also Hazardous Waste Identification, Import, Export of Hazardous
Waste)
• Accumulation
SUBKEYWORD 7
ATKl/WP DISK 44R
-------
Biennial Reports
• Manifest
• Small Quantity Generator
• Universities
GEOLOGIC REPOSITORIES (see Subpart X, Land Disposal Facilities)
GROUNDWATER MONITORING (see also Post-Closure)
* Alternate Concentration Limit (ACL)
• Aquifer
• Assessment Monitoring
• Compliance Monitoring
• Detection Monitoring
• Groundwater Standards
• Hydrogeological Data
• Monitoring
• Student's T Test
• Unsaturated Zone Monitoring
• VMS Model
• Well Construction
GROUNDWATER STANDARDS (see Groundwater Monitoring)
GUIDANCE
HAZARDOUS AND SOLID WASTE AMENDMENTS (HSWA) (see also Corrective
Action, Delisting, Joint Permitting, Land Disposal Restrictions, Leachate Collection)
• HSWA Provisions
HAZARDOUS CONSTITUENTS (see also Appendix vm. Appendix IX, Corrective Action
Dehsting)
HAZARDOUS WASTE FUELS (see also Burning and Blending, Incineration Used Oil)
• Fuel
• Waste-Derived Fuel
• Waste-as-Fuel
HAZARDOUS WASTE IDENTIFICATION (see also Characteristic Hazardous Waste
Listed Hazardous Waste)
• Aerosol Cans
• Asbestos
• Ballast Fluid
• Batteries
• Carbon Filters
• Chemical Deodorants
• Compressed Gas Cylinders
SUBKEYWQRD 0
", • ' , • ! o
ATK1/WPDISK44R
I
-------
• Contained-In
• Contaminated Groundwater
• Contaminated Soil
• Creosote
• Cyanide
• Definition
• Dibutyltin Difluoride
• Dredged Sediments
• Electric Arc Furnace
• F-Wastes
• Ferrous Metals
• Food Processing Waste
• Formaldehyde
• Freon
• High Tech Wastes
• Iron Sponge
• Manufacturing Process Units
• Mercury
• Metals
• Munitions
Oily Waste
• Paint Waste
• Phosphate Wastes
• Process Wastes
• Regulated Wastes
• Smelting Waste
• Soil
• TCLP
• TNT
• Toxicity
HAZARDOUS WASTE IDENTIFICATION RULE (HWIR)
• Contaminated Media
HAZARDOUS WASTE IMPORTATION (see Import)
HEALTH AND SAFETY
HEALTH ASSESSMENTS (see Risk Assessment)
HIGH TECH WASTES (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE (see also Subtitle D)
• Collection Programs
HOUSEHOLD WASTES (see Solid Waste)
SUBKEYWORD .9
ATKl/WP DISK 44R
-------
(see Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments)
HSWA PROVISIONS (see Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments)
HWTR (see Hazardous Waste Identification Rule)
HYDROGEOLOGICAL DATA (see Groundwater Monitoring)
IDENTIFICATION (see EPA I.D. Number)
IDENTIHCATION NUMBERS (see EPA I.D. Number)
IGNTTABILITY (see Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
IMPORT (see also Generators, Transporters)
• Hazardous Waste Importation
INCINERATION (see also Subpart X under Thermal Treatment)
BaghouseDust
BIFRule
Boiler
Cement Kiln
Destruction Removal Efficiency (DRE)
EJectrjc Arc Furnace
Furnace
Hazardous Waste Fuels
Incinerator Residue
Incinerators
, S'*1,, "'irlllM i , '" i '|! ' .....
Industrial Furnace
•
Kii
i i !'W'"l!S- "
Scrubber Water
System Removal Efficiency (SRE)
Trial Burn
, i:,Wastq"guniing
INCINERATOR RESIDUE (see Incineration)
INCINERATORS (see Incineration)
INCOMPLETE PART B 'S (see Permit Application)
INDUSTRIAL FURNACE (see Incineration)
INSPECTIONS (see Compliance)
INSURANCE (see Financial Responsibility)
INTERIM AUTHORIZATION (see State Authorization)
INTERIM STATUS PROCESS (see also Construction)
Change During Interim Status
'* ' .....
Corrective Action
Loss of Interim Status
Obtaining Interim Status
StJBKEY WORD
- -
10
ATK1AVP DISK 44R
-------
• Protective Filers
INVENTORY (see Federal Facilities)
IRON FOUNDRY WASTE (see Listed Hazardous Waste)
IRON SPONGE (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
JOINT PERMITTING (see State Authorization, Permit Process)
K-WASTES (see Listed Hazardous Waste)
LABORATORY ANALYSIS (see Analytic Methods)
LABORATORY WASTES
LAND BAN (see Land Disposal Restrictions under Land Disposal Ban)
LAND DISPOSAL (see Land Disposal Facilities)
LAND DISPOSAL BAN (see Land Disposal Restrictions)
LAND DISPOSAL FACILITIES (see also Closure, Post-Closure, Minimum Technological
Requirements, Land Disposal Restrictions, Surface Impoundment)
• Gas Condensate
• Geologic Repositories
• Land Disposal
• Land Treatment
• Landfill
• Landfill Gas
• Waste Piles
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
• BDAT
• Bulk Liquids
• California List
• Case-by-Case Extension
• Free Liquids
• Land Disposal Ban
• National Variance
• No-Migration Variance
• Notification
• Treatment Standards
LAND TREATMENT (see Land Disposal Facilities)
LANDFILL (see Land Disposal Facilities)
LANDFILL GAS (see Land Disposal Facilities)
LARGE VOLUME WASTE (see Mining Waste)
LEACHATE (see also Appendix VIE)
LEACHATE COLLECTION/DETECTION SYSTEM (see Minimum Technological
Requirements)
LEAD (see Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
SUBKEYWORD H
ATK1/WPDISK44R
-------
LEAK DETECTION (see Secondary Containment)
LEAKAGE (see Secondary Containment)
LIABILITY (see Financial Responsibility)
LIABILITY COVERAGE (see Financial Responsibility)
LINERS (see Minimum Technological Requirements; see also Land Disposal Facilities)
LIQUID WASTE (see also Land Disposal Restrictions, Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
JIC;" • • Absorbents
V ' i , IIFii!1 "Vl I -. " . • , 1C. »' ' ".• i. '.'1 "!i ....... ! ' :, '.' • "."
• Bulk Liquids
• Non-Hazardous Liquids
LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE (see also Solid Waste, Delisting, Characteristic Hazardous
Waste, Hazardous Waste Identification, Dioxin)
• Chjorjnation Tank
• Commercial Chemical Products
• Definition
• F-Wastes
• Iron Foundry Waste
.-, • • K-Wastes , ,
• Off-Specification
:;' ' • P-Wastes ' \ ' '
• Sole Active Ingredient
i Steel Foundries
; ^ ill '',1.1 . . • , I i • •
• Tqluene
• U-Wastes
• Wastewater Treatment Sludge
LOCATION (see Siting)
LOSS OF INTERIM STATUS (see Interim Status Process; see also Permit Process)
LOW LEVELf WASTE (see Mixed Waste)
MAJOR HANDLERS
MANAGEMENT STANDARDS (see Used Oil)
MANH?EST (see Generators; see also Transporters, DOT, Waste Minimization)
MANUFACTURING PROCESS UNITS (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
MARKETER (see Used Oil)
MERCURY (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
METALS (see also Hazardous Waste Identification)
MINERAL PROCESSING (see also Mining Waste)
MINIMUM SHELL THICKNESS (see Tank System)
^f^W TECHNOLOGICAL REQUIREMENTS (MTR) (see also Compatibility, HSWA,
Release, Surface Impoundment, Land Disposal, TSDFs)
• Double Liner
j;,
!,, "
' I!
SUBKEYWORD
12
ATKl/WP DISK 44R
-------
• Leachate Collection/Detection System
• Liners
• Retrofit
MINING WASTE (see also Exclusions)
• Bevill Amendment
• Boiler Slag
• Coal
• Energy Exploration Waste
• Fossil Fuels
• Large Volume Waste
MISCELLANEOUS UNITS (see Subpart X)
MIXED RADIOACTIVE WASTES (see Mixed Waste)
MIXED RADIOACTIVE/RADIOACTIVE WASTES (see Mixed Waste)
MDCED WASTE
• Atomic Energy Act (AEA)
• By-Product
• Low Level Waste
• Mixed Radioactive Wastes
• Mixed Radioactive/Radioactive Wastes
• NRC
MIXTURE RULE (see also Derived-from-Rule)
MOBILE TREATMENT UNITS (see also Permit Process, Permit Conditions)
MODELS
MODIFICATIONS (see Permit Process under Permit Modification)
MONITORING (see Groundwater Monitoring)
MORE STRINGENT/BROADER IN SCOPE (see State Authorization)
MUNICIPAL LANDFILL (see also Solid Waste)
• Sanitary Landfill
MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTION (see also Incineration)
MUNITIONS (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
NATIONAL VARIANCE (see Land Disposal Restrictions)
NATURAL GAS
NEW UNIT (see Construction)
NO-MIGRATION VARIANCE (see Land Disposal Restrictions)
NONCOMPLIANCE (see Data)
NONHAZARDOUS LIQUIDS (see Liquid Waste)
NOTIHCATION (see also Burning and Blending, EPA I.D. Number, Land Disposal
Restrictions) (see Universal Wastes)
NPDES FACILITIES (see Clean Water Act, Wastewater)
SUBKEYWORD 13
ATKl/WP DISK 44R
-------
NEC (see Mixed Waste)
°?/OD ,." '" *'*' "!' I1 ' ' ' . '"
• Signatures
• Withdrawals
P^IMP^8 (?ee also Corrective Action, Storage, TSDFs)
Expansions
[;;•: » "Operating Life
Permit lequirements
'AiC i| II ,'lJilllliij1 -TI „„ , , ,,
AL (see Permit Process)
(see Permit Process)
PERMIT PROCESS
• Appeals
StfeKEYWORD
- '•." : • • ' • ', "" ': :' .'•,.. !"•• """ '" 14
T!" ,' ;1 .. ':.; ' :': ,'...', : " " • ' : '• , " ;" . ; "V", " ",ATKiAvpDisK44R
I- i •. •""•• is- ("I'i '.• .'• ••;>•,'.'. ...-;. • • , \: •:•'•'•• ["' *!« • " f'i i.
-------
• Deadlines
• Delegation of Authority
• Joint Permitting
• On-Site Waste Management
• Permit Denial
• Permit Modification
• Permitting
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS (see Permit Conditions)
PERMIT STANDARDS (see Permit Conditions)
PERMITTING (see Closure Process, Permit Process)
PERSONNEL TRAINING
PESTICIDES (see Agricultural Waste; see also Hazardous Waste Identification)
PETITIONS (see also Exclusions, Delisting, Land Disposal Restrictions)
PETROLEUM REFINERY WASTES (see also Exclusions, Delisting)
• Refinery Waste
• Used Oil
PHOSPHATE WASTES (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
PICKLE LIQUOR (see Electroplating)
POHCS (see Incineration)
POST-CLOSURE (see also Closure, Cost Estimates, Financial Responsibility, Groundwater
Monitoring, Permit Process)
POTW (See Wastewater)
PRE-CONSTRUCTION BAN (see Permit Application)
PRE-HSWA PROVISIONS (see State Authorization)
PRECIOUS METALS (see Recycle)
PRIMARY TREATMENT (see Treatment)
PROCEDURE (see Test Methods) .
PROCESS WASTES (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
PROCESSOR REQUIREMENTS (see Used Oil)
PROTECTIVE FILERS (see Interim Status Process)
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION (see also Closure Process, Post-Closure)
QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL (QA/QC) (see also SW-846)
RADIOACTIVE/RADIOACTIVE WASTES (see Mixed Waste under Mixed
Radioactive/Radioactive Wastes)
RAGS AND WIPERS (see Solvents)
RCRA (see RCRA/CERCLA Interface)
RCRA FACILITY ASSESSMENT (RFA) (see Corrective Action)
RCRA/CERCLA INTERFACE
• CERCLA (Superfund)
SUBKEY WORD 15
ATKl/WP DISK 44R
-------
I'ti!
! .,
* RCRA
• Tax
• Treatability Study
RD&D PERMIT
REACTIVE WASTES (see Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
RECI^AMATIpN (see also Solid Waste, Recycle, Solvents, Used Oil)
• Recovery
• UnusejiMaterials
RECOVERED OIL (see Used Oil)
RECOVERY (see Reclamation)
RECYCLE (see also Reclamation, Solid Waste).
• Precious Metals
• Regeneration
! ••', ' • Reuse
« Use-Constituting Disposal
REHNERY WASTE (see Petroleum Refinery Wastes)
REGENERATION (see Recycle)
. ___ -jjijj (See j^o Corrective Action, Groundwater Monitoring)
Definitipn
.'tf-Xafik! ™!.,^.. / , ,,. .,, , ,",'.. Z*. .'!, ,...
D W4STES (see Hazardous Waste Identification, Solid Waste)
REGULATION
1 Ijial'i' i
-------
SAMPLING PLAN (see Analytic Methods)
SANITARY LANDFILL (see Municipal Landfill)
SCRAP METAL (see also Solid Waste)
• Dental Amalgam
SCRUBBER (see also Sludge)
• Baghouse Dust
SCRUBBER WATER (see Incineration)
SECONDARY CONTAINMENT (see also Tank System, Minimum Technological
Requirements)
• Containment
• Leak Detection
• Leakage
• Release
• Sumps
SECONDARY MATERIALS (see Solid Waste)
SECONDARY TREATMENT (see Treatment)
SECURITY
SEWAGE SLUDGE (see Wastewater)
SHAM RECYCLING (see Boilers and Industrial Furnaces)
SHOOTING RANGES
SIC CODES
SIGNATURES (see Permit Application)
SITING (see also Public Participation)
• Capacity
• Location
SKINNER LIST (see Appendix DC; see also Groundwater Monitoring, Delisting)
SLUDGE (see also Wastewater)
• Baghouse Dust
• Emission Control Wastes
• Scrubber
• Sludge Dryers
SLUDGE DRYERS (see Sludge)
SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR (see Generators)
SMELTING WASTE (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
SOIL (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
SOLE ACTIVE INGREDIENT (see Listed Hazardous Waste)
SOLID WASTE (see also Recycle, Hazardous Waste Identification)
• Batteries
• By-Product
SUBKEY WORD 17
ATK1/WPDISK44R
-------
• Definition
t IL
• Discarded Materials
• Household Wastes
* Regulated Wastes
, . • . Scrap Metal
• Secondary Materials
• Spent Materials
• Subtitle D
S9W|WASI:E MANAGEMENT UNITS (SWMUS) (see corrective Action)
SOI^IHCATIQN (see Treatment)
SOLVENTS (see also Listed Hazardous Waste, Wastewater, Electroplating, Reclamation,
Recovery, Recycle)
• Rags and Wipers
• Spent Solvents
SPENT MATERIALS (see Solid Waste)
SPENT SOLVENTS (see Solvents)
SPILLS (see Conti?Sency Plan; see also Corrective Action)
SRE (see System Removal Efficiency)
Y'' ST^EAUTlpRJZATIpN
I ' ?i!;(': ' *'',"' Authorized States , ", .. . ' '. ,. ' '
Capability Assessments
ChangingFederal Regulations
'. Interim'^thorizatipn , ,.,',',.. ..
.Joint Pennitting ' ' ^ " '
More Stringent/Broader in Scope
' iPr|^H^WA .Provisions
State Laws ' " / ' '. . . .,,,', !'.
State Permits
• State Prpgrams
• State Regulations
STATE LAWS (see State Authorization)
STATE PERMITS (see State Authorization)
STATE PROGRAMS (see State Authorization)
STATE REGULATIONS (see State Authorization)
STATUTORY 'AUTHORITY
STEEL FOUNDRIES (see Listed Hazardous Waste)
ST5^AG^
-------
SUBPART X (see also Permit Application, Federal Facilities, Characteristic Hazardous
Waste)
• Geologic Repositories
• Miscellaneous Units
• Open Burning/Open Detonation (OB/OD)
• Thermal Treatment
SUBPARTS AA AND BB
SUBTITLE D (see Solid Waste)
SUMPS (see Secondary Containment)
SUPERFUND (see RCRA/CERCLA Interface under CERCLA)
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT (see also Land Disposal Facilities)
• Retrofit
SURFACE WATER (see also Wastewater, Clean Water Act)
SW-846
SWMUs (see Corrective Action under Solid Waste Management Unit)
SYSTEM REMOVAL EFFICIENCY (see Incineration)
TANK SYSTEM (see also Generators, Secondary Containment)
• Ancillary Equipment
• Empty
• Minimum Shell Thickness
• Tanks
TANKS (see Tank System)
TAX (see RCRA/CERCLA Interface)
TCLP (TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACfflNG PROCEDURE) (see Characteristic
Hazardous Waste, Hazardous Waste Identification)
TEMPORARY EXCLUSION (see Delisting)
TEST METHODS (see also Analytic Methods, SW-846).
• Equivalency
• Procedure
THERMAL TREATMENT (see Subpart X; see also Incineration)
TNT (see Hazardous Waste Identification)
TOLUENE (see Listed Hazardous Waste)
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT UNITS (see Exclusions, Treatment)
TOXICITY (see Hazardous Waste Identification, Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
TRANSFER FACILITIES (see Transporters)
TRANSPORTATION (see Transporters)
TRANSPORTERS (see also Generators)
• Transfer Facilities .
• Transportation
• SUBKEYWORD 19
ATKl/WP DISK 44R
-------
Ill III I 111 I I ., : I,,',11 ii'l ' ' Ill
I i 11 ::, i i a ':" ; • K
TREATABILITY STUDY (see RCRA/CERCLA Interface)
TREATED WASTE (see Treatment)
TREATMENJ ................ ^ ;i . ..... ..... , , r ^ ............. t ....... hi .......... ^ T ............ ,, ...... , ........ .: ........
• Biological Treatment
• Chemical Stabilization
• Definition ........ , ...... .„ ........ , , ...... ., . .. OT,. ,,, . ...... \,
• Drum Shredding Unit
• Primary Treatment
;': 1 1 • Se^ondarj Treatment \ , ' ' i .. _ ' M "_ ........ '"' '
• Solidification
• Totally Enclosed Treatment Units
• Treated Waste
TREATMENT STANDARDS (see Land Disposal Restrictions)
TREATMENT STORAGE AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES (TSDFs) (see also Interim Status
Process, Permit Process, Storage, Treatment, Land Disposal Facilities)
• Active/Inactive Facilities
• Facility
TRIAL BURN (see Incineration)
TSDFs (see Treatment Storage and Disposal Facilities)
U-WASTES (see Listed Hazardous Waste)
UNDERGROUND INJECTION (see also Land Disposal Restrictions, Corrective Action
Disposal)
UNIVERSAL WASTES
,i i,;;; . » ...... No|ification
UNIVERSITIES (see Generators, see also EPA I.D. Number)
U^^URAT|DJONE (see Groundwater Monitoring under Unsaturated Zone Monitoring)
UNUSED MATERIALS (see Reclamation)
USE-CONSTITUTING DISPOSAL (see Recycle)
OIL (see also Burning and Blending, Hazardous Waste Fuels, Petroleum Refinery
Wastes) J
• DqJt-Ypurselfers (DIYERs)
. ,
• Management Standards
r-;. • JN|arjk:eter
• Processor Requirements
• Recovered Oil
;;; • Used 6J Filters ,
t, .• Waste Oil
USED OIL FILTERS (see Used Oil)
SUBKEYWORD 2Q
ATKl/WP DISK 44R
Li.
-------
VARIANCE (see also Land Disposal Restrictions)
VMS MODEL (see Groundwater Monitoring, Delisting)
VOLUNTARY CLEANUPS (see Corrective Action)
WASTE ANALYSIS (see also Analytic Methods, SW-846)
WASTE-AS-FUEL (see Hazardous Waste Fuels)
WASTE BURNING (see Incineration)
WASTE-DERIVED FUEL (see Hazardous Waste Fuels)
WASTE EXCHANGE PROGRAM (see Waste Minimization)
WASTE MINIMIZATION (see also Generators, HSWA, Manifest)
• Waste Exchange Program
WASTE OIL (see Used Oil; see also Hazardous Waste Identification)
WASTE PILES (see Land Disposal Facilities)
WASTE STREAM
WASTEWATER (see also Clean Water Act, Listed Hazardous Waste, Land Disposal
Restrictions, Mixture Rule)
• Discharge
• NPDES Facilities
. POTW
• Sewage Sludge
• Sludge
• Wastewater Treatment
WASTEWATER TREATMENT (see Wastewater)
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE (see Listed Hazardous Waste)
WELL CONSTRUCTION (see Groundwater Monitoring)
WITHDRAWALS (see Permit Application)
WOOD PRESERVING (see Wood Treatment)
WOOD TREATMENT (see also Listed Hazardous Waste)
• Creosote
• Wood Preserving
ZINC PLATING (see Electroplating)
SUBKEY WORD 21
ATK1/WPD1SK44R
-------
fc;
'ill
[.'.I
I"" :•.
I;":,
Mil" '
•Sift
||
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
-------
RCRA PERMIT POLICY
COMPENDIUM
Key Word Index
*Hotline Summaries
-------
lii'
S]
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
li;
sSH
:l
F"
' I!"
: ill
; "1111
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No.
ABSORBENTS
(See Liquid Waste)
ACCUMULATION
(See Generators) (See also Tank System)
ACL
(See Alternate Concentration Limit, Groundwater Monitoring)
ACTIVE INGREDIENT
(See Listed Hazardous Waste under Sole Active Ingredient)
ACTIVE/INACTIVE FACILITY
(See Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities)
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER
(See Enforcement, Corrective Action)
AEROSOL CANS
(See Hazardous Waste Identification)
AGRICULTURAL WASTE
(See also Exclusions)
COMMERCIAL FERTILIZERS VERSUS SOIL AMENDMENTS
FARMER EXEMPTION INTERPRETATION
FOOD PROCESSING WASTE NOT UNDER AGRICULTURAL WASTE EXCLUSION
FIFRA
CREOSOTE TREATED CROSS TIES, DISPOSAL OF, FIFRA INTERFACE
END-USERS OF CHLORDIMEFORM EXEMPTION
MATERIALS CONTAMINATED WITH PESTICIDE PRODUCTS
WOOD TREATED WITH CREOSOTE, DISPOSAL OF
Pesticides
CHLORDANE AND HEPTACHLOR PESTICIDE WASTE
CLARIFICATION ON THE USE OF SOLVENTS AS REACTANTS IN MANUFACTURING PROCESSES
COMBINED STORAGE OF PESTICIDE WASTES
CONTAINERS, TRIPLE RINSING FOR FERTILIZER ,,TTlim, nuoTTfTnuQ
• DELISTING PETITION INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDUES FROM INCINERATION OF 2,4,b-T AND SILVEX PESTICIDES
MATERIALS CONTAMINATED WITH PESTICIDE PRODUCTS
PESTICIDE APPLICATOR WASHING RINSE WATER
PESTICIDE APPLICATOR WASHING RINSEWATER
PESTICIDE DISPOSAL BY FARMERS AND CONTAINER MANAGEMENT
PESTICIDE RINSEATE TREATMENT/RECYCLING SYSTEM
PESTICIDE STANDARDS FOR FORMALDEHYDE AND PARAFORMALDEHYDE
PESTICIDES CONTAINING A 261.33(e) COMPOUND AS A SOLE ACTIVE INGREDIENT
REGULATORY INTERPRETATION REGARDING PESTICIDE APPLICATOR WASHING RINSE WATER
SOIL CONTAMINATED WITH CHLORDANE AS A RESULT OF PESTICIDE APPLICATION
SOIL CONTAMINATED WITH PESTICIDE
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
9493.1987(01)
9455.1982(01)
9441.1980(02)
9441.1985(28)
9441.1990(04)
9444.1987(40)
9441.1986(10)
09/03/87
07/07/82
08/19/80
07/16/85
02/14/90
09/09/87
02/11/86
9444.1988(10)
9444.1985(08)
9483.1984(02)
9441.1984(18)
9433.1987(26)
9444.1987(40)
9441.1985(42)
9443.1985(05)
9457.1987(01)
9471.1988(04)
9444.1989(02)
9444.1981(05)
9441.1992(43)
9444.1986(20)
9441.1987(21)
05/03/88
05/24/85
06/30/84
08/01/84
10/28/87
09/09/87
12/13/85
07/22/85
03/25/87
10/27/88
03/14/89
09/18/81
12/15/92
09/29/86
04/08/87
-------
s_ rsi-S*:*^ - :: -. •'-'! -"-=- 0 s!^ ".
«!"«> s-ilii,;!!!1 n!ffi> »*3," "SETT; TJHftfi! =&• IFSS; «t =,v?>
i^;^^:^ JN^ r ^ = i ^^^t ^^= '"W^ £€ ?•" = " J" ™-£ ^ 1:'-^^ ^;- =1 ^ -^y^'^^M*^^ ~—™T^= N?^?
iW =^ -*i! ' "^7^= - -^ J=- ^ t== = ' Ti f ^ -?~- -= = =^T = *?-^^ "-:^ - C= ^ ' -. - /-
07/02/96
KBYHOID IHDBX
Page Ho. 2
soil. commwKfso WITH USED wo WQSBD PESTICIDES
HASHWATERS GENERATED FROM HASHING PESTICIDE APPLICATOR TRUCKS
AIR EMISSIONS
9441.1987(15)
9443.1987(16)
9441.1986(441
04/18/87
03/11/67
08/13/87
05/30/86
ALTERNATIVE METALS ANALYSIS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE COMBUSTORS
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR ARCO PRODUCTS, WA
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR SUN REFINING, OK
RCRA REGULATORY INTERPRETATION ON BENZENE STRIPPERS AT WRC REFINERY
REGULATION OF FUEL BLENDING AND RELATED TREATMENT AND STORAGE ACTIVITIES
STANDARDS FOR AIR PATHWAY FOR METALS AND ORGANIC CHEMICALS
AIRBAG INFLATORS
(See Listed Hazardous Waste under Commercial Chemical Products)
j , ALTERNATE CONCENTRATION LIMIT (ACL)
(See Groundwater Monitoring) (See also Appendix VIII)
ANALYTIC METHODS
(See also Appendix VIII, Appendix IX, SW-846)
'''_ *USE OF TOTAL WASTE ANALYSIS IN TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC DETERMINATIONS
ADDITIONAL ANALYTES FOR HWIR TARGET ANALYTE LIST IN WASTEWATER
ALTERNATIVE METALS ANALYSIS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE COMBUSTORS
ANALYTICAL METHODS/EP TOXICITY TEST/REFERENCE STDS.
ASTM D4982-89 (METHOD B) AS AN EQUIVALENT METHOD OF TESTING FOR IGNITABILITY
CLARIFICATION ON ANALYTICAL QUANTITATION USING GC/MS METHODS
™.,,,r,,,,™ .. . MASTES . USE OF sw_846 METHODSi WASTE
DIOXIN STANDARD USED TO TEST GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY COLUMNS, HANDLING OF
ELECTROPLATING SLUDGE, EXCLUSION PETITION
HYDROGEN SULFIDE WASTE IN SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT - REACTIVITY CHARACTERISTIC
INAPPROPRIATE USE OF METHOD ,1311 (TCLP) AS AN ALTERNATIVE EXTRACTION PROCEDURE
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION REQUIREMENTS IN METHOD 8240
R™™EQATrA™^ CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE (TCLP,
RCRA METHODS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES (NOTES)
SW-846 METHODS MANUAL
WASTE-DERIVED FUELS AT IRON AND STEEL MILLS AS PRODUCTS OR WASTE FUELS, INFORMATION REQUIRED
Detection Limits
^
™MATION ON APPENDIX VI11 COMPOUNDS
HEALTH BASED VALUES FOR PAH'S IN COKE BY-PRODUCT WASTES
XREF
-9498.
9441.
9573.
9489.
9531.
9551.
9551.
9489.
9521.
9551.
XREF
XREF
1994(09)
1995(25)
1994(01)
1995(01)
1993(01)
1990(08)
1991(02)
1992(02)
1994(01)
1991(04)
08/17/94
08/03/95
01/10/94
01/30/95
02/23/93
10/24/90
01/17/91
08/27/92
10/17/94
01/30/91
; XREF
9445.1994(01)
9445.1993(08)
9498.1994(09)
9445.1984(02)
9443.1992(04)
.i 9445.1993(03)
9445.1987(033)
' 9443.1987(26)
9441.1985(07)
9433.1984(05) :
9443.1987(31) i
7 9445.1993(09) i
9445.1993(07)
9443.1986(10)
9445.1985(04)
9445.1984(05)
"9445.1987(02)
9443.1987(29)
9443.1987(12)
9441.1986(08)
9433.1987(26)
!9443. 1986(06) '
9433.1986(19) -
!,9445. 1989(02) I
9551.1989(0^^
/ /
01/31/94
11/05/93
08/17/94
04/23/84
08/26/92
04/08/93
11/17/87
11/12/87
02/13/85
12/11/84
12/07/87
12/07/93
09/02/93
05/05/86
06/30/85
12/20/84
09/16/87
11/18/87
06/23/87
01/24/86
10/28/87
03/12/86
12/09/86
07/18/89
07/06/89
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No.
METAL, K061 WASTES IN SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT-DELISTING PETITION
WASTE-DERIVED FUELS AT IRON AND STEEL MILLS AS PRODUCTS OR WASTE FUELS, INFORMATION REQUIRED
Laboratory Analysis
"LABORATORY TESTING FOR DIOXIN
*PH TESTING OF SOLID/WATER MIXTURE
ANALYSIS OF APPENDIX IX CHEMICALS, PROPOSED
ANALYSIS OF FLUFF MATERIALS
APPENDIX VIII CONSTITUENTS IN GROUNDWATER, REQUIREMENTS FOR ANALYSIS OF
ASTM STANDARDS IN THE RCRA PROGRAM
CLARIFICATION OF METHOD 8260 CALIBRATION STANDARDS AND "WASTE TYPE"
CLARIFICATION ON MATRIX SPIKES FOR METHOD 8310
CLARIFICATION ON WHETHER OR NOT A LABORATORY MUST USE THE "SW-846 'A' ORGANIC METHODS" WHICH WERE RECENTLY PROMULGATED
EXEMPTION FROM PARTICLE SIZE REDUCTION STEP IN TCLP
GLASS FIBER FILTERS FOR USE IN CONDUCTING THE TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE (TCLP)
ISSUESGCONCERNING THE°COMPARISON OF SFE EXTRACTION RESULTS TO THOSE OBTAINED USING SONICATION13550) RATHER THAN SOXHLETU540,3541)
LABORATORY EQUIPMENT USED IN CONDUCTING THE TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE (TCLP)
LABORATORY EVALUATION PROGRAM
LABORATORY SAMPLE EXCLUSION APPLICABILITY TO SAMPLES AND WASTES FROM LABORATORY ANALYSIS - DIOXIN
LEACHING TESTS FOR EVALUATING SOILS CONTAMINATED WITH LEAD
LEAD PAINT REMOVAL DEBRIS AND THE TCLP PROCEDURE
MATRIX SPIKE IN TCLP PROCEDURE
METHODS 1310 AND 1330: EXTRACTION PROCEDURE AND EXTRACTION PROCEDURE FOR OILY WASTE
METHODS 8240 AND 8260 DIFFERENTIATION AND EQUIVALENCY
RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO USE PALLADIUM FOR GRAPHITE FURNACE ANALYSIS IN SEVERAL SW-846 METALS METHODS
SEDIMENT SAMPLE DISPOSAL
SW-846, THIRD EDITION, HOLDING TIMES FOR SEMIVOLATILES
TCLP EXTRACTIONS AS THEY APPLY TO OILY WASTE
TOTAL CONSTITUENT ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE HAZARDOUS CHARACTERISTICS OF WASTE SAMPLE
Sample Analysis
*LABORATORY TESTING FOR DIOXIN
*SW-846 TEST METHODS
ALLOWABLE HOLDING TIMES WHEN TESTING RCRA SAMPLES
ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR CONDUCTING TESTING UNDER THE TC RULE
CLARIFICATION OF PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
DEFINITION OF HOLDING TIME
DELISTING ACTION - STATUS OF HOLLOMAN AIR FORCE BASE
DELISTING ISSUES RELATING TO EPA'S MOBILE INCINERATOR
DILUTION OF TEST SAMPLING
EVALUATION OF DELISTING PETITIONS-INFORMATION REQUIRED
FLUFF ANALYSIS/SAMPLES
HANDLING AND ANALYSIS OF SAMPLES CONTAINING VOC'S
LABORATORY EVALUATION PROGRAM
LABORATORY SAMPLE EXCLUSION APPLICABILITY TO SAMPLES AND WASTES FROM LABORATORY ANALYSIS - DIOXIN
MULTIPLE EXTRACTION PROCEDURE, METHOD 1320
PARTICLE SIZE REDUCTION PROCEDURE FOR TCLP SAMPLES OF DRY CELL BATTERIES
QC REVIEW OF PERMIT DATA
RCRA FACILITY ASSESSMENTS, IMPLEMENTATION
RCRA TEST METHODS & QA ACTIVITIES
SELECTION OF NON-USEPA APPROVED METHODS FOR SUBPART X PERMITS
SURROGATE RECOVERY
SW-846, THIRD EDITION, HOLDING TIMES FOR SEMIVOLATILES
TOTAL CHROMIUM ANALYSIS
TOTAL CONCENTRATION USED TO DEMONSTRATE A WASTE DOES NOT EXHIBIT THE CHARACTERISTIC OF EP TOXICITY
9433.1987(18)
9441.1986(08)
9441.1985(11)
9443.1983(03)
9481.1986(02)
9442.1991(02)
9481.1985(01)
9445.1987(05)
9445.1993(02)
9445.1992(02)
9433.1994(01)
9442.1991(13)
9443.1986(19)
9441.1992(14)
9445.1994(02)
9443.1986(17)
9472.1986(02)
9441.1987(29)
9443.1987(24)
9442.1991(12)
9442.1991(03)
9443.1987(14)
9442.1991(06)
9445.1987(03)
9445.1994(03)
9441.1989(12)
9445.1987(06)
9442.1991(08)
9443.1987(33)
9441.1985(11)
9554.1991(04)
9445.1987(04)
9442.1991(17)
9441.1992(19)
9445.1993(01)
9433.1987(16)
9433.1986(20)
9442.1991(04)
9433.1986(04)
9442.1989(02)
9442.1991(15)
9472.1986(02)
9441.1987(29)
9442.1988(06)
9442.1991(07)
9442.1990(04)
9502.00-4
9441.1988(31)
9442.1990(03)
9442.1991(09)
9445.1987(06)
9443.1987(11)
9443.1989(01)
08/07/8?
01/24/86
03/30/85
02/28/83
07/25/86
02/22/91
10/15/85
12/21/87
03/11/93
12/22/92
10/12/94
10/09/91
09/30/86
06/03/92
03/10/94
09/03/86
01/29/86
04/30/87
11/05/87
08/30/91
03/19/91
08/11/87
05/09/91
10/20/87
03/10/94
03/31/89
06/30/87,
06/13/91
12/31/87
03/30/85
12/01/91
12/04/87
10/01/91
07/07/92
01/21/93
07/31/87
12/11/86
03/25/91
02/14/86
01/25/89
12/17/91
01/29/86
04/30/87
10/19/88
05/29/91
11/01/90
08/21/86
07/30/88
11/19/90
06/19/H
06/30/87
06/08/87
01/27/89
-------
07/02/9S
KEYWORD IWJBX
Page Ho,
Sampling ;,'";"
AGITATE SAMPLES EVALUATED USING METHOD 4110 . = - . -
CLARIFICATION ON SAMPLING .AND DATA INTERPRBTATJON . -
DEMISTING ACTION - STATUS iOF HOLLOMAN AIR FORCE BASE t ,;„ S, «: ; :; j
DELISTING POLICY ALLOWS EXCLUSION OF SEPARATE HASTE TREATMENT UNITS AT MULTI-UNIT FACILITIES
EVALUATION OF DELISTING PETITIONS-INFORMATION REQUIRED
FLUFF ANALYSIS/SAMPLES 1
INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT OF LAB SAMPLES
LABORATORY HASTE EXCLUSION
METAL, K061 WASTES IN SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT-DELISTING PETITION
METHODOLOGIES EMPLOYED IN USED OIL SAMPLING
MODIFICATIONS TO HASTEHATER TREATMENT SYSTEM UNDER EXCLUSION
RCRA FACILITY ASSESSMENTS, IMPLEMENTATION
SAMPLING LOCATION IN A SEPARATOR - THICKENER TREATMENT TRAIN AND THE MIXTURE RULE
SAMPLING PLAN FOR DELISTING PETITION FOR WASTES IN LANDFILL TRENCHES
SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS FOR ESTIMATING VARIABILITY OF WASTES FOR DEDISTING PETITIONS
SEDIMENT SAMPLE DISPOSAL
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR DELISTING PETITION
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
TEST SAMPLES, EXCLUSION FROM HAZARDOUS WASTE
Sampling Plan
ANALYSIS OF RETESTING PROCEDURES PAPER
CYANIDE FURNACE CRUCIBLES TREATMENT
DELISTING PETITIONS FOR K-WASTES MANAGED IN ON-SITE LAND-BASED UNITS-MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
DETERMINATION ON WHETHER A GENERATOR'S FLUORESCENT TUBES ARE NONHAr.WlDOUS
DRAFT SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN FOR NH PLATING COMPANY
SAMPLING LOCATION IN A SEPARATOR - THICKENER TREATMENT TRAIN AND THE MIXTURE RULE
SAMPLING PLAN FOR DELISTING PETITION ADDRESSING HSWA REQUIREMENTS FOR ANALYZING FOR APPENDIX VIII COMPOUNDS
SAMPLING PLAN FOR DELISTING PETITION FOR WASTES IN LANDFILL TRENCHES
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT SAMPLING PLAN FOR HOLLOMAN AIR FORCE BASE
ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT
9441.1990 (17)"
9441,1392(26)
9431.1987 (16)
9433.1987(22)
=9433.1986(04)
"9442.1989(02)
94411.4989(20)
944i:.1985(03)
9433.1987(18)
'9442.1991(11)"
9441.1991(01)
:9502.00-4
9433M986(11)
'9433'. 1986 (21)
9433'.1986(22)'
9441.1989(12)
9433.1991(02)
9523.00-14
9431.1989(03)
'9481.1991(01):
9433.1990(05)
9433.1987(21)
:9441. 1995(23)
9433.1990(06)
9433.1986(11)
19433.1986{23)
9433.1986(21)
9484.1988(03)
06/29/90
08/26/92
07/31/87
10/02/87
02/14/86
01/25/89
04/27/89
07/31/85
08/07/87
07/09/91'
01/03/91
08/21/86
04/24/86
12/13/86
12/18/86
03/31/89
04/26/91
03/14/86
06/05/89
10/16/91
09/26/90
09/28/87
06/22/95
11/27/90
04/24/86
12/30/86
12/13/86
06/20/88
(See Tank System)
API SEPARATOR SLUDGE
-:XREF
(See also Petroleum Refinery Hastes, Sludge, Wastewater)
*API SEPARATOR WASTEWATER AND SLUDGE
PETROLEUM FACILITIES INCLUDED IN THE K051 LISTING FOR API SEPARATOR SLUDGE
APPEALS
(See Permit Process) (See also Closure Process)
APPENDIX IX
XREF
^9444. 1984 (06)
9444 . 1987 (20)
XREF
/ /
04/30/84
05/26/87
(See also Appendix VIII, Groundwater Monitoring)
*APPENDIX VIII AND APPENDIX IX
ANALYSIS OF APPENDIX IX CHEMICALS, PROPOSED
STANDARDS FOR AIR PATHWAY FOR METALS AND ORGANIC CHEMICALS
Skinner List
*DELISTING PETITIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTES FROM THE PETROLEUM INDUSTRY
*SKINNER LIST
XREF / /
.9445.1989(01).-- 06/30/89
9481.1986(02) , 07/25/86
=9551.1991(04) 01/30/91
(9433.1994(03)
;9445.1985(0j
(Q£^
11/30/94
08/30/85
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No.
APPENDIX VIII
(See also ACL, Analytic Methods, Appendix IX, Groundwater Monitoring, Hazardous Constituents, Sampling)
* APPENDIX VIII AND APPENDIX IX
*APPENDIX VIII GROUNDWATER MONITORING
APPENDIX VIII CONSTITUENTS IN GROUNDWATER, REQUIREMENTS FOR ANALYSIS OF
CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE ISSUES FOR INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER, RCRA REGULATORY STATUS
DlS P^ON^F^^ -M INCINERATION OF 2 4£TAND SILVEX PESTICIDES
DICTION LIMIT REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION ON APPENDIX VIII ™«P™ FOR A DEL ISTING PETITION
ENFORCING GROUNDWATER MONITORING REQUIREMENTS IN RCRA PART B PERMIT APPLICATIONS
MATERIALS USED IN FERTILIZER PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT
MODIFICATIONS TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM UNDER EXCLUSION TRTrHIOROBFNZENE
- -PENDIX VIII COMPOUNDS
^^EMENTS^FOnSTIMAilNS V^IA^ILm OF wiSE"^ DELATING PETITIONS
SOIL CONTAMINATED WITH TOLUENE
STANDARDS FOR AIR PATHWAY FOR METALS AND ORGANIC CHEMICALS
AQUEOUS WASTE
(See Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
AQUIFER
(See Groundwater Monitoring)
ASBESTOS
(See Hazardous Waste Identification)
ASSESSMENT MONITORING
(See Groundwater Monitoring)
ATOMIC ENERGY ACT (ABA)
(See Mixed Waste)
AUTHORIZED STATES
(See State Authorization)
BAGHOUSE DUST
(See Incineration, Sludge)
BALLAST FLUID
(See Hazardous Waste Identification)
BATTERIES
Isee Solid Waste, Hazardous Waste Identification)
XREF
9445.1989(01)
9445.1987(01)
9481.1985(01)
9476.1987(08)
9442.1984(01)
9433.1986(20)
9433.1987(26)
9433.1986(19)
9504.1984(01)
9493.1991(05)
9441.1991(01)
9488.1991(01)
9433.1986(23)
9433.1986(22)
9445.1985(01)
9551.1991(04)
/ /
06/30/89
03/30/87
10/15/85
12/17/87
12/26/84
12/11/86
10/28/87
12/09/86
08/16/84
10/11/91
01/03/91
02/05/91
12/30/86
12/18/86
04/05/85
01/30/91
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
/ /
/ /
-------
- = = ~= =-
i^'» 1-
ft: It; ^ E i== =« = 1= || 1
'
^
j;
07/02/96
KCTHORD 1MDEX
Til 1^ =
MS :? "WI
3|J
BOAT ;; ^ ,_-.
4," - ^-W^^
:iSee Beat; Demonstrated Available Technology, Land Diaposal Reatrictiona)
BEST DBMONSTRATEDfAVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY (BOAT) . ! : -. •
(See LandiDisposal Restrictions) ; ; ,
BEVILL EXCLUSION (AMENDMENT)
(See Mining Haste)
BIENNIAL REPORTS
(See Generators) = - ". - r
BIF RULE . : ' ,
(See Incineration)
BIFs
(See Boilers and Industrial Furnaces)
BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT
(See Treatment)
BLASTING CAPS • '
(See Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
BLENDING AND BURNING !l
(See Burning and Blending)
BOILER : ; : ; -,"\
(See Incineration) , , ,
BOILER SLAG
(See Mining Waste)
BOILERS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES (BIFs)
ALTERNATIVE METALS ANALYSIS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE COMBUSTORS ^ ' ' =
CLARIFICATION OF REGULATION OF FUEL BLENDING AND RELATED TREATMENT AND STORAGE ACTIVITIES
^^^"^AIION REGARDING_SINGLE EMISSION POINT, MULTI-DEVICE COMBUSTION FACILITIES
r OF A
WHETHER OR NOT A FACILITY QUALIFIED FOR INTERIM STATUS FOR ITS BOILERS UNDER THE BIF RULE
ON TRIAL^UR^FAILURE ^ SECONDARY MATERIALS USED °R REUSED DIRECTLY AS INGREDIENTS IN AN INDUSTRIAL PROCESS
'F DRAFT HAZARDOUS WASTE MINIMIZATION AND COMBUSTION STRATEGY ON OHIO'S REGIONAL
HEAT CONTENT REQUIREMENTS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTES BURNED IN BIFs
MINIMUM HEAT CONTENT REQUIREMENTS OF WASTE-DERIVED FUEL BLENDED FOR EMERmiRRfnvRPV IN BIFs
XREF
XREF;
XREF
XRBF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF .
.XREF
XREF
XREF
Page Mo. £
? :T:
I I
/; /-:!£ !! SI
it,-;, f 7ft i
REGULATIONS^
flER^^E
9498.
9498.
9498.
.9498.
9498.
9498.
9498.
9498.
9573.
9498.
9498.
1994(09)
1994(13)
1994(08)
1994(07)
1994(03)
1994(05) -
1994;(06) t
1994!(04)
1994!(02)
1994J
08/17/94
12/05/94
07/29/94
07/21/94>
05/26/94
07/14/94
07/20/94
07/05/94
i 01/10/94
'05/20/94
•11/04/94
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No.
REGULATORY DETERMINATION OF THE PRIMER NEUTRALIZATION UNIT "POPPING FURNACE"
REGULATORY INTERPRETATIONS UNDER RCRA CONCERNING CERTAIN FUEL BLENDING SCENARIOS
SHAM RECYCLING POLICY AS IT PERTAINS TO THE BOILER AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACE RULE
USE OF METAL SURROGATES IN COMPLYING WITH THE BOILER AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACE (BIF) RULE
BOND RATINGS
(See Financial Responsibility)
BULK LIQUIDS
(See Land Disposal Restrictions, Liquid Waste) .
BURNING AND BLENDING
(See also Incineration, Used Oil)
*BURNING/BLENDING OF UNUSED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT (XYLENE) WITH USED OIL
*ENERGY RECOVERY ON-SITE CONSTITUTES REUSE FOR THE GENERATOR PROCESSING EXEMPTION
* HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL MARKETERS
*NATURAL GAS PIPELINE CONDENSATE AND ENERGY RECOVERY
*USEDSOILISTORAGENTANKDBOTTOMS: HAZARDOUS WASTE OR USED OIL WHEN BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY?
*WASTE MINIMIZATION AND RECYCLING ACTIVITIES THAT RESEMBLE CONVENTIONAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICE u,™DT,t 0
APPLICABILITY OF USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS TO ACTIVITIES INVOLVING SEPARATION OF USED OIL FROM SORBENT MATERIALS
ATOMIZER MULTI-OIL FUELED HEATERS, INSPECTION AND CERTIFICATION CRITERIA FOR
BULKING QR CONTAINERIZING COMPATIBLE HAZARDOUS WASTES FOR TRANSPORTATION
BURNING OF USED OIL IN THE MARINE INDUSTRY AND USED OIL GENERATOR NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
% SME^Af =E^^ XO HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL BLENDING ACUITIES
COAL/FOSSIL FUEL COMBUSTION WASTES EXCLUDED FROM SUBTITLE C PENDING FURTHER STUDY
'MINERAL PROCESSING RESIDUALS FROM COMBUSTION UNITS BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL
MINIMUM HEAT CONTENT REQUIREMENTS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTES BURNED IN BIFs
MIXING LOW AND HIGH BTU WASTES - SHAM BURNING, BLENDING, MANIFESTING
NOTIFICATION BY BURNERS OF USED OIL WHO FIRST CLAIM THAT USED OIL MEETS SPECIFICATIONS
REGULATION OF FUEL BLENDING AND RELATED TREATMENT AND STORAGE ACTIVITIES
REGULATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TRANSFER OPERATIONS " „„
REGULATORY STATUS OF RESIDUAL AVIATION FUELS THAT ARE BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
USED OIL FOR INDUSTRIAL BURNERS
Burning Hazardous Waste Fuel.
*BURNING AND BLENDING AND INTERIM STATUS
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS AND STORAGE STANDARDS FOR MARKETERS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
BOILERS AND INCINERATORS, DISTINCTION BETWEEN/ INTEGRAL DESIGN STANDARD
BURNING AND BLENDING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE AND USED OIL FUELS
BURNING COMPRESSOR OIL WITH AMMONIA IN SPACE HEATERS
BURNING OF OFF-SPEC USED OIL
CEMENT KILN BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FUELS DURING INTERIM STATUS „_._„
CLARIFICATION OF REGULATION OF FUEL BLENDING AND RELATED TREATMENT AND STORAGE ACTIVITIES
COAL TAR DECANTER SLUDGE WASTE PILE (TOLEDO COKE)
9489.1994(02) 09/19/94
9498.1994(12) 11/08/94
9494.1994(03) 06/07/94
9498.1995(01) 11/09/95
XREF
XREF
* -USED DIRECTLY AS INGREDIENTS IN AN INDUSTRIAL PROCESS
FIRE TRAINING PITS, REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR
HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL CADENCE PRODUCT 312, REGULATION OF ,,„,„„„„, D1,r.i
INDUSTRIAL FURNACES BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTES AND THE RESIDUALS GENERATED (LOUIS. ANA REG)
MARKETING OR BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL, NOTIFICATION OF „„„„„„„ TM DTr.
MINIMUM HEAT CONTENT REQUIREMENTS OF WASTE-DERIVED FUEL BLENDED FOP ENERGY RECOVERY IN BIFs
XREF
9442.1985(01)
9495.1994(01)
9453.1985(04)
9443.1987(23)
9454.1986(02)
9592.1994(11)
9561.1994(02)
9592.1994(09)
9495.1988(02)
9432.1990(02) •
9495.1989(02)
9495.1986(09)
9494.1992(01)
9432.1995(02)
9441.1984(20)
9441.1984(19)
9498.1994(02)
9442.1987(04)
9495.1987(01)
9521.1994(01)
9461.1989(01)
9441.1995(04)
9495.1986(22)
9528.1985(11)
9494.1986(05)
9432.1986(02)
9495.1985(03)
9494.1991(03)
9494.1986(053)
9528.1987(10)
9498.1994 (13)
9441.1987(98)
9494.1986(06)
9498.1994(06)
9489.1987(02)
9494.1986(04)
9494.1987(02)
9494.1986(01)
9498.1994(11)
/ /
12/30/85
05/31/94
11/30/85
10/30/87
02/28/86
09/30/94
07/31/94
09/28/94
09/22/88
03/01/90
10/17/89
04/21/86
11/27/92
10/12/95
08/16/84
08/15/84
05/20/94
08/31/87
01/20/87
10/17/94
01/03/89
02/02/95
09/15/86
12/30/85'
04/11/86
01/03/86
12/12/85
04/23/91
06/30/86
09/03/87
12/05/94
.12/24/87
12/31/86
07/20/94
07/22/87
04/11/86
04/15/87
02/09/86
11/04/94
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page Ko. 8
MIXTURES OF HASTES AND LEGITIMATE BURNING FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
REOIOH V FUEL-BLENDING FACILITIES CONCERNS
=*IT^^ .
S5S o? %£?%S£S? •"""" TAMK USBD T0 FEBD HATERIAL IHTO A
• rREGULATORY STATUS OF TREATMENT ASSOCIATED HITH FUEL-BLENDING ACTIVITIES
'cl^I!!MINERATION AND TOEATMENT °F K048-K052 HASTES IN CEMENT KILNS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES
SPENT AND RECLAIMED SOLVENTS, BLENDING OF RECLAIMED XYLBNE ruiwHu.«>
SULFUR RECOVERY FURNACES ARE INDUSTRIAL FURNACES SUBJECT TO THE HASTE-AS-FUEL RULES
TWO WASTE OIL MANAGEMENT PRACTICES REGULATORY STATUS
T° RE° "ATER IKCM7) FR°M H"ICH SODIUM SULFITE IS RECOVERED AND WHICH IS USED AS A FUEL
WASTE DERIVED REFINERY FUEL PRODUCTS EXEMPTIOH
HASTE
BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL
(See Burning and Blending)
BY-PRODUCT
(See Solid Waste, Mixed Waste)
CALIFORNIA LIST
(See Land Disposal Restrictions)
CAPABILITY ASSESSMENTS
(See State Authorization)
CAPACITY
(See Siting)
CARBON FILTERS
(See Hazardous Waste Identification)
CASE-BY-CASE EXTENSION
(See Land Disposal Restrictions)
CEMENT KILN
(See Incineration) (See also Hazardous Waste Fuels)
CEMs
(See Continuous Emissions Monitors)
CERCLA (SUPERFOND)
(See RCRA/CERCLA Interface)
•9494
9441
9494
19498
'9441
9442.
i9494.
9494.
9441.
9432.
9495.
9441.
9441.
:9494.
9441.
:9494.
.1987C03)
.19911(17)
.1993(01)
.13941(12)
.1993(21)
19941(05)
1994!(01)
1991(02)
1987(24)
1986(04)
1991(01)
1987(42)
1986(11)
1986(02)
1986(08)
1985(03)
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
08/31/87
11/04/91
09/14/93
11/08/94,
11/01/93
04/15/94
01/28/94=
03/29/91
04/15/87
01/21/86
06/05/91
06/09/87
02/11/86
03/19/86
01/24/86
10/11/85 -
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 9
CERCLA/RCRA INTERFACE
(See RCRA/CERCLA Interface)
CERTIFICATION
(See also Closure Process, Generators, Post-Closure, Waste Minimization)
CERTIFICATION FOR CONTAINER STORAGE
CERTIFICATION OF CLOSURE
'HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS - INSTALLATION/CERTIFICATION OF SECONDARY CONTAINMENT
*LOSS OF INTERIM STATUS - LAND DISPOSAL FACILITIES
*raELMHWESTOF^ STATUS BECAUSE OF NON-COMPLIANCE WITH GWM AND FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS
213 OF HSWA, REQUIREMENTS - PERMIT ISSUANCE AND CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE
APPENDIX VIII CONSTITUENTS IN GROUNDWATER, REQUIREMENTS FOR ANALYSIS OF
BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE IN BOILERS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES (BIFs)
CERTIFICATION PROCESS ON BIOTECHNOLOGICAL METHODS FOR REMEDIATION OF INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES
CERTIFICATION/NOTIFICATION FOR MULTIPLE-CONSTITUENT WASTES SUBJECT TO LDRs
CLARIFICATION OF THE TERM INDEPENDENT, REGISTERED, CERTIFIED ENGINEER
DIOXIN TRIAL BURNS FOR PURPOSES OF CERTIFICATION OR A RCRA PERMIT
DISPOSAL FACILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS CERTIFICATION
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION
INTERPRETATION OF 40 CFR 268.7 REQUIREMENTS •
MANIFEST CERTIFICATION SIGNATURE BLOCK FOR EMPLOYEES SIGNING FOR GENERATING COMPANY
MODIFIED MANIFEST WASTE MINIMIZATION CERTIFICATION FOR SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS
NEUTRALIZATION SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, RETROFITTING VARIANCES
NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT WHEN SHIPPING RESTRICTED WASTES TO A STORAGE FACILITY
POLICIES REGARDING SELF-CERTIFICATION OF NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE
POST-CLOSURE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS (ARMCO STEEL)
QUALIFICATION OF AN ENGINEER FROM THE CORPS OF.ENGINEERS AS INDEPENDENT WITH RESPECT TO AN ARMY FACILITY
RELEASES OF HAZARDOUS WASTE, RCRA APPLICABILITY TO
SECONDARY CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS CERTIFICATION
TANK SYSTEMS APPLICABLE TO PRODUCTION TANKS DURING CLEANOUT, PROCESS TRANSFER EQUIPMENT, AND HOSE LINES
THIRD THIRD LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
THIRD THIRD LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS FINAL RULE
WASTE MINIMIZATION CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
CHANGE DURING INTERIM STATUS
(See Interim Status Process)
CHANGING FEDERAL REGULATIONS
(See State Authorization)
CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE
(See also SW-846, Listed Hazardous Waste, Hazardous Waste Identification)
•DISCARDED MERCURY THERMOMETERS
•HAZARDOUS WASTE LISTED SOLELY FOR SUBPART C CHARACTERISTICS
•USED OIL STORAGE TANK BOTTOMS: HAZARDOUS WASTE OR USED OIL WHEN BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY?
*WA^TF TDFNTIPICATION
ACTIVATED CARBON CANISTERS USED TO COLLECT SOLVENT VAPORS GENERATED DURING PAINT APPLICATION
ANTARCTICA WASTE DISPOSAL PRACTICES
APPLICABILITY OF HAZARDOUS WASTE CODES TO A CHEMICAL POLISHING SYSTEM
ARE TANK BOTTOMS REMOVED FROM TANKS CONTAINING ONLY NAPHTHA DEEMED TO BE K052 HAZARDOUS WASTE?
AUTOMOTIVE FLUIDS, REGULATION OF •
XREF
XREF
9523.1983(02)
9476.1987(05)
9483.1988(13)
9528.1985(03)
9551.1988(13)
9470.1985(01)
9522.1985(03)
9481.1985(01)
9494.1991(01)
9486.1989(01)
9551.1991(10)
9476.1992(02)
9488.00-1A
9551.1987(07)
9476.1993(02)
9554.1988(03)
9452.1985(02)
9452.1986(02)
9484.1986(04)
9551.1987(20)
9442.1995(02)
9522.1986(03)
9483.1987(20)
9502.1987(05)
9483.1988(18)
9483.1986(11)
9551.1990(15)
9551.1991(13)
9452.1986(01)
/ /
02/28/83
09/30/87
06/30/88
09/30/85
11/30/88
02/28/85
07/05/85
10/15/85
02/04/91
03/30/89
06/05/91
12/21/92
05/07/86
03/10/87
06/04/93
05/13/88
10/17/85
10/20/86
04/21/86
10/28/87
02/07/95
11/20/86.
12/15/87
04/02/87
12/12/88
12/19/86
12/20/90
12/20/91
04/28/86
XREF
XREF
XREF
9444.
9441.
9592.
9441.
9444.
9442,
9443,
9442,
9441,
1989(09)
1986(74)
1994(11)
1987(77a)
1986(08)
1989(04)
1994(05)
1995(04)
1987(14)
08/30/89
09/30/86
09/3,0/94
09/30/87
05/02/86
04/26/89
07/15/94
05/25/95
03/06/87
-------
: i: y-:ii-?*~ Ii
" I'
- "
ii El MJ ! I
IP i:!UB i!
07/02/96
Ii B
=,f • ;•« i ; i :( ;!; ••••?•>-. •_> •' •)••-•• • ;?•;; T •••••• -r ••• n~ —- •"* i J™rTT'' i I ! !l •••*!••.
- -- = - ' ^
' - - -T - - - '- - J- .-- - T -- '
BY-PRODUCT CRUDE OIL: TANK BOTTOMS
CALIFORNIA LIST PROHIBITIONS APPLICABILITY AFTER THIRD THIRD RULE
CARBON REGENERATION FACILITIES
CAUSTIC RINSING HBTAL PARTS
•fc .^CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS HASTE OR SOLID WASTE TREATMENT MAY CREATE A LlSsTED HAZARDOIl^WftQTp' ' ";"' '
CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTES GENERATED AT PRIMARY METAL SMELTING AND REFININC errpc
^'rU^S^f^ SU)DGES RECLAIMED OR PROCESSED PRIOR TO USE AS AN INGREDIENT IN FERTILIZER :
:™ 4KCHARACTERISTICTESTS FOR DETERMINING THE HAZARDOUS CHARACTERISTICS OF MINING WASTES " *"
CHLORIDE- ILM'ENITE PROCESS HASTES "'w»&^
Pr RRTPTpaTTnM nu UofaLJ OIL REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO MIXTURES OF USED OIL AND CHARACTERISTIC WASTE
™^E.R.C5AL CHEMICAL PRODUCT p LISTING APPLIES ONLY TO UNUSED PRODUCT, NOT USED RESIDUPq
DELISTING CRITERIA/LEACHATE LEVELS oii>uuo
ETCHANTS USED TO MANUFACTURE COPPER SALTS
J -0==^ ;
EXPORTING CHARACTERISTICALLY HAZARDOUS SLUDGE FOR RECLAMATION LBACHATE LEVELS
GENERATOR RECYCLING HAZARDOUS HASTE ON-SITE
HAZARDOUS CHARACTERISTIC - BASIS FOR LISTING
HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION OF "NICKEL MATTE" BY-PRODUCT
HAZARDOUS WASTE LISTING FOR F006 WASTE
I^n^T^ DEVICES CONTAMINATED WITH OIL DURING QUALITY CONTROL TESTING :
:
LIQUID, FREE LIQUID, RELEASABLE LIQUID DEFINITIONS
LITHIUM BATTERIES
LUBRICATING OIL AND JET FUELS USED TO PRODUCE PETROLEUM PRODUCTS
LUBRICATING OIL CONTAMINATED WITH TCDD THROUGH USE AS AN ANALYTICAL STANDARD
MANAGEMENT OF WASTES PRIOR TO INTRODUCTION INTO SEWER ANALYTICAL S™»ARD
MECHANICAL PLATING HASTES IN THE F006 LISTING, NON- INCLUSION OF
MIXING HAZARDOUS WASTE WITH USED OIL (REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION)
MIXTURES OF SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTES
MIXTURES OF SOLID WASTE AND A WASTE LISTED SOLELY BECAUSE IT EXHIBITS A CHARACTERISTIC
MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTION, DISPOSAL OF RESIDUAL ASH
_ ON-SITE RECYCLING OF SPENT SOLVENTS BY GENERATORS
-PACKAGES CONTAINING RESIDUAL URETHANE COATING CHEMICALS ! ;
PROCESS WASTES CONTAINING INKS, PAINTS, AND ADHESIVES
REACTOR VESSEL WASHOUT CONTAINING TRACE AMOUNTS OF SOLVENT
RECYCLED CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE SLUDGES
R™TORY STATufofpfA^^rpc T° ™E MANMEMENT OF HASTE SOLVENTS AND USED OIL
^1,™ STATUS OF PLASTIC CHIPS FROM RECLAMATION OF LEAD-ACID BATTERIES
.REJECT SUBSTRATES CONTAINING VENADIUM PENTOXIDE REGULATION UNDER RCRA
RELISTING HAZARDOUS WASTE
^RESIDUES GENERATED FROM THE TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE, I.D. NUMBERS FOR
SCINTILLATION COCKTAIL, REGULATION OF LIQUID "UMBERS FOR
SIWERDRECOVND SMALI* CAPACITORS CONTAINING DEHP, DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SOLAR CELL AND HIGH TECH INDUSTRIES HAZARDOUS WASTE
SPENT ANTI- FREEZE COOLANT REGULATORY STATUS
TOTAL CHROMIUM ANALYSIS
n^nTpL^M^o8 °F CHARACTERIS«C HAZARDOUS WASTE AS A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE
=USED X-RAY FILM AS A SPENT MATERIAL - SILVER RECLAMATION
;WASTE GENERATED DURING THE MANUFACTURE OF POLYURETHANE FOAM
WASTE SOLVENT-BASED GLUE
1WASTES GENERATED FROM EXTRACTION PROCESS
* i SWOOD TREATED WITH CREOSOTE, DISPOSAL OF
• A
w . . ; 5r
i .- i . i
"" ' : "~-~- ;" ', , -
e II • f;U !!!! • B
1: ! Imft -_ ~ -«l - B ei !:!^ E if
* *rij==^*=f^ °J s" ^'7 ^ - ' -'-' ;!s: "1 ~
'- - -'-If V,i; '-^~-f^^~ ,;r --" v ,5
:: - •. .-'. . - :, :" .--:'; -"- ,
-],-,• ,."-:,"-.- 9441.1986i(3i7)
" , --* ~ • -"-=• : i !9551.1991/(11)
„ 9441.1986:(26)
: ":J^i I : -liiv: 3444. 19871(33)
^ ; " 3i-: r9442.1989:(05)
- --, r-^ - •; -- -f- :9443.1986,(16)
19493. 19851(03)
;- , , 9443.1985(09)
-•'- - 9441.1991(05)
•"--- ' "^ 9592.1993(05)
!A.--"^ , ; ;— 9441.1992(26)
'" : '--'_ '•-•-- -. -_^*--- 'x 9444.1986(29)
"'-"'• '.-:" 9433.1986(01)
.- , , ?.JW -L V 9441.1986(82)
. ,« 9443.1985(01)
*, .:.-- 9441.1986(03)
- " - 9453.1993(02)
• 9453.1987(04)
:: * 9441.1984(32)
X -_V 9441.1994(32)
-" - :.- = ^: -W 9441.1986(78)
„,,.„' ;Jj' 9495.1986(20)
'!; ^: : :"*","„" 9444.1987(52)
-•---.----_- 9441.1986(07)
• 9443.1988(02)
------ 9432.1989(04)
' ;: - - ." • 17 9443.1987(02)
'9494. 1985 (01)
, ---: •. __- -i.-* --9444.1987(48)
" "''- 5< : ^9441. 1986(73)
;- v ^:v * 9444. 1986(13)
: - - •-::«'.** 9495.1986(04)
i ' S ;i\ 7" i^f 9441.1987(06)
; ' ' °:' ''*"* 9441. 1985 (38)
/ -. ^ ,Ua l7ui:aS,:£s9443. 1987(06)
M;*'"j.a-^ 1986(21)
;/ ~- ."7-': 7^9443.1987(09)
: -." = '9441.1987(09)
^ r ""i -"^9444.1987(49)
:; • t*;v :•; %1; «f,:W'v;3j;944i.i985(39)
9441.1992(36)
; ? ^^ = rfrf^:i^!9441.1993(13)
--•;.-7 7 •:;_-X-.':i:^9444. 1986(17)
; •_: :„ ™t~i :a6;i.i«l,ja<:9442.i986(08)
' : ; !\ 9441.1986(05)
:: ,:- .".: 'if ilrf ' _ Jj»ri**29443.1987 (18)
~ ~-:- ^r- ."-?- :>i^ftK^944 1.1985 (23)
' " 7 'r 9441.1987(02)
- - •.- — •- ; -9444.1983(03)
. _- ,j --9441.1990(25)
' * ---."-- -i""i«-i'9443.1987(ll)
J, «,r »: :,,.9441.1988(44)
-» L- - - - ~ rL1»wi944 1.1986 (42)
/ -•---"• - :1 : *'9441.1992(24)
M,^,,, ^^-^^443.1989(02)
:== -•-'—• ' 'WJ":f";;9442.1986(07)
if^ --.f ft 1986Ug^
^P
i «= fci™==irita=
Page; Ho, 10
!! | g
h
—
OS/01/86 •
09/27/91 -
04/02/86 --.
ii 08/07/87 i«
1 07/05/89 ^"
s 07/09/86 sat
!! 11/25/85 »
:; 10/03/85 "is
04/22/91 «7
09/24/93
; OB/26/92 Sw
; 12/08/86 'i7
01/07/86 -C
i 11/08/86 BPi
02/21/85 s =
(i 01/07/86 f*«
: 03/23/93 •-'.
: 07/14/87 =
:, 11/07/84 lv
12/23/94 «'
, 10/12/86 V7
i? 08/22/86 ^;
!; 12/11/87 "iS
i 01/23/86 V
• 01/13/88 -:.'.
: 07/20/89 7
01/14/87 "-•*
- 10/01/85 7-
10/23/87
1 09/25/86 M
:: 06/24/86 v-
J: 02/28/86 * ^
ii 01/27/87 W
n/20/85 ;;-
,, 04/08/87 i:»i
ii 03/13/86 SS
! OS/13/87 : ^'
02/19/87 ;S
•: 10/26/87 ,"-r:
!i 11/25/85 TA?
"10/28/92 " trrr
;: 08/04/93 • W
; 09/04/86 TTT;
;; 08/21/86 i^
i 01/16/86
;08/19/87 i
:i 06/27/85 -'-^
01/06/87
07/20/83 -I;
08/24/90 .7
06/08/87 :"r"
10/27/88 ^
:05/20/86 tt»
•08/17/92 7**
i:04/12/89 ill
"07/02/86 ""
||02/ll/86 jj!
!| J2
"-
|j;
J
15
1!
;l
!!|
I;
'*
1
stl
c-
=t i
:||
ii:
:' !
.1
«]
B|
If :
;,
i;
';
iji
,-!
i?!
jji
Si
iii
«i
|;i
|!
3;
:•!
=SI
!*=:
t!
I;
e;
•:
I!
II
i j
«J
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 11
Aqueous Waste
* "AQUEOUS" AS APPLIED TO THE CORROSIVITY CHARACTERISTIC
* ALCOHOL-CONTENT EXCLUSION FOR THE IGNITABILITY CHARACTERISTIC
*AQUEOUS WASTE AS IGNITABLE
*POLLUTION CONTROL SLUDGE PROM TREATMENT OF MINING WASTE - EXCLUSION
AQUEOUS AS USED IN THE CORROSIVITY CHARACTERISTIC
AQUEOUS SOLUTION, IGNITABILITY DEFINED
CORROSIVE CHARACTERISTIC APPLIED TO LIQUID AND AQUEOUS WASTES
HANDLING AND ANALYSIS OF SAMPLES CONTAINING VOC'S
IGNITABILITY OR CORROSIVITY TESTING-LIQUID AND AQUEOUS DEFINITION
INTERPRETATION OF "AQUEOUS" AS APPLIED TO THE CORROSIVITY CHARACTERISTIC
INTERPRETATION OF "AQUEOUS" AS APPLIED TO THE CORROSIVITY CHARACTERISTIC
LIQUID AS IT APPLIES TO IGNITABLE OR CORROSIVE WASTES
PRECIPITATION WHICH IS CORROSIVE DUE TO CONTACT WITH EXEMPT WASTES (COAL GASIFICATION ASH)
SOLVENT-CONTAMINATED WASTESTREAMS FROM A PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURER
WASTES GENERATED BY COKE AND COAL TAR PLANTS
WATER/METHANOL MIXTURE WASTESTREAM
Blasting Caps
BLASTING CAPS AS REACTIVE WASTES
Corrosive Wastes
* "AQUEOUS" AS APPLIED TO THE CORROSIVITY CHARACTERISTIC
*LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - CORROSIVE WASTE
*POLLOTION CONTROL SLUDGE FROM TREATMENT OF MINING WASTE - EXCLUSION
AQUEOUS AS USED IN THE CORROSIVITY CHARACTERISTIC
BATTERIES, SCRAP METAL, AND PRECIOUS METALS
COPPER PLATING SOLUTION
COPPER PLATING SOLUTION REACTED WITH A CHELATING AGENT TO PRODUCE A COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER
CORROSIVE CHARACTERISTIC APPLIED TO LIQUID AND AQUEOUS WASTES
CORROSIVE SOLIDS, COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS, REACTIVE WASTES DEFINED
CORROSIVITY CHARACTERISTIC AS IT APPLIES TO SOLIDS
DEFINITION OF A LIQUID AS IT APPLIES TO IGNITABLE AND CORROSIVE WASTES
DEIONIZATION ACID
DELISTING PETITION OF NITROGEN TETROXIDE RINSATE
FOOD PROCESSORS, IMPACT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE REGULATIONS ON
INTERPRETATION OF "AQUEOUS" AS APPLIED TO THE CORROSIVITY CHARACTERISTIC
INTERPRETATION OF "AQUEOUS" AS APPLIED TO THE CORROSIVITY CHARACTERISTIC
NITRIC ACID WASTE CHARACTERIZATION
PAINTING CONTRACTOR WASTES-SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR „„„„„„ A0m
PRECIPITATION WHICH IS CORROSIVE DUE TO CONTACT WITH EXEMPT WASTES (COAL GASIFICATION ASH)
RECLAMATION OF SPENT ALKALINE ETCHANT-REQUEST FOR VARIANCE UNDER MOD. CLOSED-LOOP PROVISION
REGENERATION OF USED BATTERIES EXEMPTED FROM REGULATION
RESIDUAL WATER DERIVED FROM AN EXEMPT WASTE (COAL ASH) IS EXEMPT
REUSE/RECYCLE REGULATIONS IMPACT ON SPENT LEAD-ACID BATTERY RECYCLING
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR CORROSIVITY
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR, REUSE OF
SPENT SULFURIC ACID PICKLE LIQUOR USED TO PRODUCE FERTILIZER
TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN PIPELINES LEADING TO A WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
USE OF PAINT FILTER LIQUIDS TEST TO DETERMINE FREE LIQUIDS IN A WASTE
Dilution
*DILUTION OF F003 WASTES
*DILUTION OF LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTED WASTE
*DILUTION TO MEET TREATMENT STANDARDS
CLARIFICATION OF CERTAIN ASPECTS OF 40 CFR 268 DEBRIS REGULATIONS
9443.1992(05)
9443.1992(03)
9443.1984(06)
9441.1985(09)
9443.1987(19)
9443.1985(02)
9443.1987(17)
9442.1991(15)
9432.1990(01)
9443.1992(02)
9443.1993(05)
9441.1989(51)
9441.1986(31)
9441.1988(49)
9442.1987(02)
9443.1985(07)
9443.1984(05)
9443.1992(05)
9551.1987(19)
9441.1985(09)
9443.1987(19)
9441.1985(44)
9443.1986(04)
9493.1986(01)
9443.1987(17)
9443.1984(09)
9443.1992(01)
9443.1989(083)
9443.1986(11)
9433.1990(07)
9443.1980(02)
9443.1992(02)
9443.1993(05)
9443.1989(09)
9441.1986(47)
9441.1986(31)
9433.1985(06)
9441.1986(51)
9441.1986(49)
9497.1986(01)
9443.1988(05)
9441.1987(17)
9493.1985(02)
9441.1986(62)
9445.1993(04)
9441.1986(97)
9551.1988(02)
.9554.1986(05)
9551.1994(01)
09/30/92
07/31/92
08/30/84
02/28/85
09/14/87
02/26/85
08/18/87
12/17/91
02/16/90
04/23/92
04/23/93
10/05/89
04/21/86
12/06/88
07/24/87
09/10/85
09/11/84
09/30/92
09/30/87
02/28/85
09/14/87
12/18/85
01/22/86 v
01/22/86
08/18/87
11/29/84
03/09/92
10/05/89
05/12/86
12/21/90
09/16/80
04/23/92
04/23/93
11/17/89
06/02/86
04/21/86
10/29/85
07/02/86
06/16/86
02/06/86
05/02/88
03/31/87
11/14/85
08/19/86
04/19/93
12/30/86
05/30/88
12/30/86
10/06/94
-------
I! i :
II j :
j! : — ^-—rv-e::;.:^
-- - «= :j .-I=V-M--' w* n : s -jj -Hi? «;"i Tji j-'-j^-^f, r-i . T- = =r: _ -,- ; 3- :
;-*:r^^::tnrsv:-r.-
07/02/96 ,:
i i -,-- ; - i Jg'Igl^J- -^ £;i j:! t 11
;- - :«:i =: AE^.: — *,: ; ,: -s-
KEYWORD INDEX
-f •"« =™sr-;J>,-i
i; ;i [ i j |
= 1 L^ = ~ -l~ ~~ "if-=r"--=\19itfTf-1-JfffT=t Pi S^ ji ft:5 ii p
-- --" -s.' ~ '---"- =1 - .- ~ - -i-™; ?--* "" ^" . - : =3
>"::EE#..;:^
~= 4 " " - • y - s
j_ ^.-.-i^-r-T __^ f_ __,--, gm^-* J=- ; 5r=Li g I
—3^AMD CRiOSHING OPERATIONS v
LDR 0BTERMIHATION OF HASTE STREAM^ DlfcUTlQN " '" ' -
PSSTICIDBS CONTAIHIWG A 261.33 (c) COMPOUND AS A SOWS ACTIVE "iMGHBDIBHT
SUHtoRY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
, =TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN PIPELINES LEADING TO A HASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT ! '
EP Toxioity
*EP TOXICITY FOR OILY HASTES
*EP TOXICITY TEST ON OILY WASTES
•LANDFILLS HITH EP TOXIC LEACHATE, REGULATION OF
*LDR REQUIREMENTS DURING NATIONAL CAPACITY VARIANCE
; ALLOWABLE HOLDING TIMES WHEN TESTING RCRA SAMPLES :
ANALYSIS OF FLUFF MATERIALS !
. ANALYTES TO LOOK FOR WHEN PERFORMING RCRA ANALYSIS
ANALYTICAL METHODS/EP TOXICITY TEST/REFERENCE STDS.
/ur.TBnn«T. ATJOH _ EVALUATXON op THE HASTE EVAI)UATIOH TEST
UNITS - REGULATORY STATUS
CHROMIUM IN TANNERY WASTES !
TESTING REQUIREMENTS, CYANIDE AND OTHER WASTES. STEEL INDUSTRY
DETECTION LIMIT FOR EP-LEACHATE CONCENTRATION OF SELENIUM INDUSTRY
EP TOXICITY LEVEL FOR BARIUM IN DRINKING HATER
EP TOXICITY TEST EXTRACTION MEDIUM, REQUESTED CHANGE IN
EXTRACTION PROCEDURE TOXICITY TEST
FR°M FERR°US METALS RECTCLING (AUTOMOBILE SHREDDING)
OILY HASTE
LEAD-BASED PAINT RESIDUES AND CONTAMINATED SOILS
MERCURY DRY CELL BATTERIES AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
=PAL3H^Tf C^^ S
MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTION, DISPOSAL OF RESIDUAL ASH
.PAIN? FIL™ SDS TEST USE° T° DETERMINE COMP1-IANCE «"H THE CALIFORNIA LIST RESTRICTIONS
PAINT WASTES AND THE SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS
RECYCLED CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE SLUDGES
RECYCLING OF MOLDING AND CASTING SANDS
-REGENERATION OF USED BATTERIES EXEMPTED FROM REGULATION
IN THE BE™
TOTAL CHROMIUM ANALYSIS
WASTE BATTERIES AND CELLS
^9433
9443
9443
19443
9443
9433
04/26/84
10/H/90
OS/23/":
1 11/13/8?
^19444.i1989(03)j 06/28/89
a9S23.!00-14 ii 03/14/86
9441.1986(62)M 08/19/86
3-9443.1985(08)^ 09/30/85
.1984(04)^ 07/30/84
.1984(04) v 08/30/84
i9551.1990(16) *a 12/01/90
944S.1987(04):V, 12/04/87
^19442.1991(02)%, 02/22/91
9442.1989(03) 04/20/89
*9445.1984(02) A 04/23/84
;-9442.1988(03)rt 05/02/88
-9489.1991(04); 08/02/91
^9441.1986(24)^ 03/21/86
.1987(26) « 11/12/87
.1984(06) :I 12/18/84
.1986(06) V: 03/12/86
.1989(03) "^ 04/20/89
.1985(10) ^ 10/21/85
.1981(01) •* 06/17/81
.1987(09) -5 06/08/87
.1989(10) -03/27/89
=9442.1989(02) W 01/25/89
:9441.1988(48) -« 11/21/88
-49443.1986(09) "^04/30/86
>v9451.1986(03) >a 04/28/86
9431.1989(01) "306/26/89
^9554.1990(11) ffi08/24/90
59443.1987(28) W11/20/87
i9443.1986(18) :S 09/04/86
9443.1987(14) : 08/11/87
J9443.1986(13) ^05/27/86
^9443.1987(06) S04/08/87
:;9553.1987(15) K12/03/87
19444.1982(01) :'09/15/82
9444.1987(17) ' 05/20/87
•9441.1985(39) =-11/25/85
9441.1986(01) :: 01/06/86
,9441.1986(51) t07/02/86
3441.1993(15) 309/14/93
'9441.1987(16) "03/17/87
9443.1986(15) ,=.:06/26/86
9443.1987(01) =01/06/87
:9493.1985(02) -11/14/85
;9441.1991(15) 3=09/25/91
,9443.1987(11) a,06/08/87
-9443.1989 (01) Woi/27/89
59443.1987 (33) JJ12/31/87
9443.1987(12) «06/23/87
;9443.1983 (OS(Bt07/27/83
lOjg^O
hl
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 13
Explosive Wastes
ASH RESIDUE GENERATED FROM INCINERATION OF K045
CLARIFICATION OF DISCARDED AMMUNITION OF 0.50 CALIBER
CORRECTIVE ACTION/PERMIT ISSUES - U.S. ARMY - ABERDEEN PROVING GROUNDS
DEMILITARIZATION OF MUNITIONS
DETONATING EXPLOSIVE WASTES
FOR RL=NG.- AND TREATMENT -STANDARDS FOR CFC
SUBJECT TO RCRA WHEN THERE IS AN INTENT TO DISPOSE OR DESTROY THEM
EMERGENCY PERMITS FOR DETONATION OF EXPLOSIVE WASTE ,KT»,VCTC
EXPLOSIVES PRESENTING AN IMMEDIATE SAFETY THREAT AND EXPLOSIVES STORED DURING ANALYSIS
LEAKING OR DAMAGED EXPLOSIVES
REACTIVE WASTE - EXPLOSIVITY
REGULATORY ISSUES PERTAINING TO WASTES CONTAMINATED WITH EXPLOSIVE RESIDUES
RESPONSE TO PROPOSED PROCEDURE TO DECOMMISSION ALUMINUM CHAFF ROVING BUNDLES
I9IU*ALCOHOL-CONTENT EXCLUSION FOR THE IGNITABILITY CHARACTERISTIC
*AQUEOUS WASTE AS IGNITABLE
*NATURAL GAS PIPELINE CONDENSATE AND ENERGY RECOVERY
AQUEOUS SOLUTION, IGNITABILITY DEFINED
• ASTM D4982-89 (METHOD B) AS AN EQUIVALENT METHOD OF TESTING FOR IGNITABILITY
CHARACTERISTIC OF IGNITABILITY
CHARACTERIZATION OF WASTE STREAMS FROM POLYMERIC COATING OPERATIONS
S5SSrW" "DOr^
D001 CHARACTERISTIC WASTES - LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
DEFINING IGNITABLE LIQUIDS METHOD
DEFINITION OF A LIQUID AS IT APPLIES TO IGNITABLE AND CORROSIVE WASTES
DETERMINATION OF THE IGNITABILITY CHARACTERISTIC
F003 10% RULE AND ASSOCIATED REGULATIONS
FIRE TRAINING PITS, REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR
IGNITABILITY CHARACTERISTIC TESTING FOR SOLIDS
IGNITABILITY CHARACTERISTIC, DEFINITION OF UNDER STANDARD TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE
IGNITABILITY CHARACTERISTIC, DEFINITION OF UNDER STANDARD TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE
IGNITABLE SOLID DEFINITION APPLIED TO TITANIUM SWARF
MIXTURE0OFEMETHANOL°AND SOLID WASTE WHICH DOES NOT EXHIBIT ANY CHARACTERISTICS
r™™™^^ OF IGNITABILITY AS IT PERTAINS TO SOLIDS VS. LIQUIDS
THIRD THIRD LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
THIRD THIRD LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS FINAL RULE
TOLUENE-LADEN FILTER RESIDUE -GENERATED FROM AN INK PRODUCTION PROCESS
WATER/METHANOL MIXTURE WASTESTREAM
Lead
*LEAD USED AS SHIELDING IN LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL
BLAST SLAG TESTING PROCEDURES
^DET^NAT^^^ THE REQUIREMENTS OF 40 CFR SECTION 268.45, TABLE 1
FLUFF RESIDUALS FROM FERROUS METALS RECYCLING (AUTOMOBILE SHREDDING)
INTERIM SOIL CLEAN-UP LEVELS FOR LEAD AT SUPERFUND SITES
LEACHING TESTS FOR EVALUATING SOILS CONTAMINATED WITH LEAD
LEAD CONTAMINATION RESULTING FROM SKEET SHOOTING
LEAD PAINT REMOVAL DEBRIS AND THE TCLP PROCEDURE
LEAD-BASED PAINT RESIDUES AND CONTAMINATED SOILS
LEAD-BEARING WASTES TREATMENT STANDARDS
9441.1987(12)
9443.1994(06)
9502.1986(09)
9441.1987(03)
9443.1987(30)
9443.1988(07)
9441.1985(31)
9527.1986(01)
9527.1988(03)
9471.1988(05)
9443.1988(10)
9443.1995(01)
9444.1994(02)
9443.1992(03)
9443.1984(06)
9443.1987(23)
9443.1985(02)
9443.1992(04)
9443.1987(07)
9442.1995(01)
9443.1995(03)
9441.1994(26)
9554.1990(02)
9442.1991(05)
9443.1989(083)
9443.1991(01)
9444.1987(30)
9489.1987(02)
9443.1990(01)
9443.1988(08)
9443.1988(08)
9443.1983(01)
9444.1988(02)
9441.1986(23)
9442.1987(06)
9443.1995(02)
9551.1990(15)
9551.1991(13)
9444.1985(09)
9443.1985(07)
9441.1992(12)
9442.1989(09)
9476. 1988 (02a)
9554.1995(02)
9441.1988(48)
9502.1990(01)
9443.1987(24)
9444.1993(04)
9442.1991(12)
9443.1987(28)
9554.1990(06)
03/03/87
11/03/94
05/08/86
01/07/87
11/30/87
06/02/88
10/03/85
01/05/86
08/11/88
11/30/88
09/13/88
02/24/95
01/26/94
07/31/92
08/30/84
10/30/87
02/26/85
08/26/92
04/16/87'
01/26/95
09/19/95
09/28/94
02/22/90
03/27/91
10/05/89
09/06/9C
07/21/87
07/22/8?"
01/30/90
09/09/88
09/09/88
01/10/83
01/20/88
03/21/86
10/26/87
08/24/95
12/20/90
12/20/91
06/03/85
09/10/85
05/31/92
11/03/89
03/02/88
09/19/95
11/21/88
05/07/90
11/05/81
09/23/93
08/30/91
11/20/87
06/25/90
-------
07/02/36
? :i| |m\ ;
KEYWORD IHDBX,
Ho, 14
SINCLAM OIL, OK
5, .OM-SITB TREATMENT OF MANHOLE SEDIMENT WHICH MAY EXCEED THE TOXICITY OlARACTERISTIC FOR LBftO
HASTE
!RECyCIiINO OF HOLDING AMD CASTING SftNDS : : .: i
;" iSECONDARY LEAD SMEI/TER VARIANCES '
„ .SOIL CLEANUPS FOR LEAD - CLEANUP STANDARDS FOR CLEAN CLOSURE
N: iSTATUS OF HASTES GENERATED FROM ABATEMENT OF LEAD-BASED PAINT • '.-':'
TCLP AND LEAD PAINT REMOVAL DEBRIS
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL METHODS FOR LOW-LEVEL HASTES THAT CONTAIN UNCONTAHINATED OR RADIOACTIVE LEAD
TREATMENT OF AN INHERENTLY HAZARDOUS DEBRIS THAT EXHIBITS THE TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC FOR LEAD AND CADMIUM
„. USED OIL, BURNING OF OFF-SPECIFICATION FUEL - DUMPING w»«,*u,,
Reactive Wastes
*SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS CONTAINING WASTEHATER WHICH BECOMES REACTIVE WHEN DRY
AEROSOL PAINT AND SOLVENT CANS DEMONSTRATION OF REACTIVITY
ASH RESIDUE GENERATED FROM INCINERATION OF K045
AVAILABILITY OF CRITERIA USED TO EVALUATE THE CHARACTERISTIC OF REACTIVITY
BATTERIES, SCRAP METAL, AND PRECIOUS METALS
BLASTING CAPS AS REACTIVE WASTES
CHEMICAL AGENTS GB, VX, AND HX AT MUNITIONS DISPOSAL FACILITY
CLARIFICATION OF DISCARDED AMMUNITION OF 0.50 CALIBER
SS££^,l^rc5^ SSoSSrSSSiE WA^D™™ m THE REACTIVITY
CYANIDE-SALT CONTAINING WASTES IN METAL HEAT TREATING OPERATIONS
• DETONATING EXPLOSIVE WASTES
DISCARDED CLASS C EXPLOSIVES
DOD MUNITIONS BECOME SOLID HASTE SUBJECT TO RCRA WHEN THERE IS AN INTENT TO DISPOSE OR DESTROY THEM
HYDROGEN SULFIDE WASTE IN' SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT - REACTIVITY CHARACTERISTIC
POPPING FURNACES-DOD DISPOSAL OF OUTDATED ORDNANCE BY INCINERATION - METALS RECOVERY
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION OF SPENT NUCLEAR REACTOR FUELS
REACTIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF DISCHARGED Li/302 BATTERIES
REACTIVE WASTE - EXPLOSIVITY
REGULATORY ISSUES PERTAINING TO WASTES CONTAMINATED WITH EXPLOSIVE RESIDUES
SMALL ARMS AMMUNITION REACTIVITY, OFF SPECIFICATION
SPENT IRON SPONGE REGULATION AND TREATMENT
SULFIDE REACTIVITY CHARACTERISTIC
40 CFR 260.10
I ,J
TCLP
*FILTERS USED TO RECLAIM CFC REFRIGERANT
*MIXTURES OF USED OIL AND CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE
* PETROLEUM CONTAMINATED MEDIA AND DEBRIS UNDER THE TC UST TEMPORARY DEFERAL
*REMOVAL OF TC WASTE FROM A SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT
*USE OF TOTAL WASTE ANALYSIS IN TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC DETERMINATIONS
ACTIVATED CARBON CANISTERS SATURATED WITH SPENT SOLVENTS
ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR CONDUCTING TESTING UNDER THE TC RULE
APPROPRIATENESS OF THE EP/TCLP SIMULATION OF CO-DISPOSAL SITUATION FOR MINING WASTES
BIAS CORRECTION APPLIED TO THE TCLP
CCA TREATED WOOD WHEN DISPOSED
CHARACTERISTIC TESTS FOR DETERMINING THE HAZARDOUS CHARACTERISTICS OF MINING WASTES
DIGESTION OF EP AND TCLP EXTRACTS PRIOR TO METAL ANALYSIS
DILUTION OF TEST SAMPLING
ELECTRIC UTILITY POLES
EP TOXICITY TEST EXTRACTION MEDIUM, REQUESTED CHANGE IN
EXEMPTION FROM PARTICLE SIZE REDUCTION STEP IN TCLP
GENERATOR USE OF TOTAL CONSTITUENT ANALYSIS IN LIEU OF THE EP OR TCLP TESTS
GLASS FIBER FILTERS FOR USE IN CONDUCTING THE TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE (TCLP)
9551, 1990 (12H
9553 ."1994 (01) .- -
9432.1994(03)
94SSjy991(03)i«.
9441.!l!986(01)g!
9444.1988(14)
9S02.t989(02)H
9443.1994(03)
9442.1991(10)^:
9441.1987 (52) C
9554.1993(02)
9441.1986(40)**
11/08/90
06/23/94
10/07/94
12/10/91
01/06/86
08/26/88
05/25/89
05/24/94
07/03/91
06/26/87
11/18/93
07/31/86
9443.1983(02);
;9441.1987(77)S
"9441.1987(12)
. 9443.1993(03) ,
9441.1985(44)
9443.1984(05) v
-9443.1984(03) '*
3443.1994(06)
:i9443.1993(07) -'."
?;;9443.1984(09);V
9444.1984(01) '
,9443.1987(30) :
3443.1988(07) ::-
"9441.1985(31) :
9443.1987(31):
5441.1983(04) ^
9442.1993(04)
, 9443.1987(05) !.i
9443.1988(10) V
"9443.1995(01) v
9443.1984(10)
^;9443.1986(02) W
:9443. 1985(04) ^
01/30/83
09/30/87
03/03/87
03/03/93
12/18/85
09/11/84
06/04/84
11/03/94
11/08/93
11/29/84
03/05/84
11/30/87
06/02/88
10/03/85
12/07/87
06/08/83
11/22/93
03/18/87
09/13/88
02/24/95
11/30/84
01/17/86
07/16/85
'9441
4^9443
; 9441
:19443
9445
-^9441
9442
"
: 9442
9441
9443
,19443
9442
;9443
:;9442
H9451
1992(32) h
1993(02) S
1990(31) ^:
.1991(02)
.1994(01)
.1986(54)
.1991(17)
.1985(01)
.1990(02)
.1991(11)
.1985(09)
.1989(10)
.1991(04)
.1990(21)
.1985(10)
.1991(13)
.1986(03)
1986
09/30/92
02/28/93
10/01/90
11/01/91
01/31/94
07/15/86
10/01/91
10/03/85
11/08/90
06/28/91
10/03/85
12/13/89
03/25/91
07/19/90
10/21/85
10/09/91
04/28/86
09/30/86
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. IS
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING ISSUES
LABORATORY EQUIPMENT USED IN CONDUCTING THE TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE (TCLP)
LABORATORY EQUIPMENT USED TO RUN THE TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE (TCLP)
LEACH TESTING PROCEDURE TO REMOVE LEAD-CONTAMINATED SOILS FROM RESIDENTIAL AREAS
LEACHING TESTS FOR EVALUATING SOILS CONTAMINATED WITH LEAD
LEAD AND ARSENIC WASTES TREATMENT STANDARDS
LEADED PAINT SANDBLASTING WASTE TESTING USING TCLP
LOSS OF INTERIM STATUS FROM NEWLY IDENTIFIED TC WASTES
MATERIALS USED IN FERTILIZER PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT
MATERIALS USED IN FERTILIZER PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT
MATRIX SPIKE IN TCLP PROCEDURE
METHODOLOGIES EMPLOYED IN USED OIL SAMPLING
MOBILE TREATMENT UNITS QUALIFIED FOR INTERIM STATUS
MODIFICATIONS TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM UNDER EXCLUSION
PETROLEUM REFINING WASTES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR WWTUs
POTENTIALLY CONFLICTING REGULATION OF INFILTRATION GALLERIES BY THE OGWDW AND OSW
QC REVIEW OF PERMIT DATA
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION OF SPENT NUCLEAR REACTOR FUELS
REGULATIONS FOR DISPOSAL OF CERAMIC MATERIALS
REINJECTION OF GROUNDWATER DURING AUTHORIZED CLEANUP ACTIVITIES
REVISIONS TO THE TCLP
SHELL OIL FACILITY - TC COMPLIANCE
SLUDGES WITHIN SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, NEWLY REGULATED DUE TO TC RULE
TC APPLICABILITY TO MIXED WASTE
TC RULE - IMPLEMENTATION
TC RULE HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION
TC RULE RELATIONSHIP TO USED OIL FILTER DISPOSAL
TCLP EXTRACTIONS APPLIED TO LIQUID WASTES, OILS AND SOLVENT-BASED PRODUCTS
TCLP EXTRACTIONS AS THEY APPLY TO OILY WASTE
TCLP IN THE LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS PROGRAM AND HAZARDOUS WASTE IDENTIFICATION PROGRAM
TCLP PARTICLE SIZE REDUCTION EXEMPTION FOR MUNITIONS
UNDERGROUND INJECTION WELLS USED IN HYDROCARBON RECOVERY
USE OF PETROLEUM-CONTAMINATED SOILS AS AN INGREDIENT IN ASPHALT BATCHING
USED AUTOMOBILE ANTIFREEZE DISPOSAL
USED OIL FILTERS - REGULATION
USED OIL FILTERS, REGULATORY DETERMINATION
WASTE MANAGEMENT OPTIONS FOR ZINC-CARBON BATTERIES
Toxicity
*USE OF TOTAL WASTE ANALYSIS IN TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC DETERMINATIONS
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION OF SPENT NUCLEAR REACTOR FUELS
REGULATORY STATUS OF SPENT ANTIFREEZE
CHEMICAL DEODORANTS
(See Hazardous Waste Identification)
CHEMICAL STABILIZATION
(See Treatment)
CHLORINATION TANK
(See Listed Hazardous Waste)
9443.1993(01)
9443.1986(17)
9443.1986(10)
9431.1989(01)
9443.1987(24)
9554.1990(11)
9442.1991(01)
9528.1990(02)
9493.1991(04)
9493.1991(05)
9442.1991(03)
9442.1991(11)
9528.1991(02)
9441.1991(01)
9483.1990(03)
9521.1991(01)
9442.1990(04)
9442.1993(04)
9441.1992(22)
9522.1993(01)
9443.1993(04)
9431.1991(02)
9484.1991(01)
9441.1991(02)
9441.1990(29)
9441.1991(12)
9451.1991(03)
9442.1991(14)
9442.1991(08)
9443.1987(29)
9442.1991(16)
9521.1991(02)
9493.1991(02)
9442.1991(18)
9441.1990(30)
9442.1990(05)
9441.1993(09)
9445.1994(01)
9442.1993(04)
9441.1994(01)
01/18/93
09/03/86
05/05/86
06/26/89
11/05/87
08/24/90
01/08/91
07/11/90
10/11/91
10/11/91
03/19/91
07/09/91
02/27/91
01/03/91
09/20/90
08/27/91
11/01/90
11/22/93
07/21/92
03/04/93
04/02/93
05/09/91
03/08/91
02/12/91
10/01/90
07/31/91
04/16/91
10/29/91
06/13/91
, 11/18/87
05/01/91
08/30/91
06/20/91
12/19/91
10/30/90
10/30/90
05/06/93
01/31/94
11/22/93
01/21/94
XREF
XREF
XREF
-------
i I!j I Mji
!« ,,s » a; , I
07/02/96
REWORD H»EX
i p !
Page
IS
CHROMIUM
(Sec; Exclusions)
CIVIL ENFORCEMENT ":
(See Enforcement). (See, also Compliance)
ii : , : ; *:.''.
CLEAN AIR ACT
(See also Incineration, Used Oil, TSDFs) V »
BIF REGULATIONS EFFECTS ON INDUSTRIAL BOILER •-- .
GASEOUS EMISSIONS FROM LANDFILLS = "
INCINERATORS THAT RECEIVE GASEOUS EMISSIONS, RCRA EXCLUSION, CAA APPLIES
RESIDUES FROM MUNICIPAL WASTE RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITIES
CLEAN CLOSURE
(See Closure Process)
CLEAN WATER ACT
(See also Exclusions)
**
*«»
™HATABILITV GROUP
WOOD PRESERVING AND SURFACE PROTECTION FACILITIES, CONTROLLING ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES FROM
NPDES Facilities
LEAKS, SPILLS, AND ILLEGAL DISCHARGES OF LISTED WASTES TO SURFACE WATERS, MIXTURE RULE APPLIED TO
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR ZERO WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM •
WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT EXEMPTION
Wastewater
*BDAT FOR WASTEWATER
*MIXTURE RULE - DISCHARGES TO WASTEWATER
•ZERO DISCHARGE AT FACILITIES AND SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, RCRA EXCLUSION, CWA APPLIES
ANTARCTICA WASTE DISPOSAL PRACTICES
CARBON REGENERATION FACILITY, MIXTURE OF SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTES (CALGON)
CLARIFICATION OF RECYCLED USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS AS THEY APPLY TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT ACTIVITIES
EXEMPTION FOR WASTEWATER DISCHARGES AND GENERATOR ACCUMULATION PROVISIONS
FILTER PRESS PROPOSED AS PART OF CORRECTIVE ACTION - NOT EXCLUDED FROM PERMITTING
INTERPRETATION OF INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER DISCHARGE EXCLUSION FROM THE DEFINITION OF SOLID HASTE
LAND DISPOSAL OF SOLVENTS
REACTOR VESSEL WASHOUT CONTAINING TRACE AMOUNTS OF SOLVENT
SAMPLING LOCATION IN A SEPARATOR - THICKENER TREATMENT TRAIN AND THE MIXTURE RULE
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS VIS-A-VIS NPDES-PERMITTED DISCHARGE POINTS
HASTES COVERED UNDER THE DIOXIN LISTING
WASTES GENERATED IN A PROCESS USING METHYLENE CHLORIDE TO RECOVER ALKALOIDS FROM PLANT MATTER
WASTEWATERS EXCLUSION FROM THE DEFINITION OF F021 FOR PCP MANUFACTURE
CLEANUP STANDARDS
(See Corrective Action)
XREF
•t :\
:?XREF ;,
XREF
•9488.1991(03)
9487.1986(03)
9441.1984(15)
9487.1986(08)
XREF
i /i
09/23/91
03/06/86
07/31/84
05/27/86
•XREF ;
9554.1994(06)
9444.1986(07)
,9441.1986(28) .
9441.1986(07)
'9471.1989(01)
,9431.1989(02)
'9432.1986(16)
9522.1987(02)
(9441.1984(14) is
'9442.1989(04) [
9441.1986(33)
=9592.1994(02) •
5441.1987(96) :
J9433. 1987 (10)^1
=9441.1995(05) ;I
'9453.1987(09)
9444.1987(49)
;9433.1986(11)
9484.1986(09)
9444.1986(23)
9441.1986(52)
9444.1987(39)
/ /
10/24/94
04/07/86
04/07/86
01/23/86
03/20/89
09/26/89
12/30/86
12/30/87
05/30/84
04/26/89
04/23/86
03/22/94
12/10/87
06/12/87
02/17/95
12/10/87
10/26/87
04/24/86
12/29/86
10/21/86
07/02/86
09/02/87
XREF
CLOSURE
(See Interim Status Process)
XREF
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No.
CLOSURE PLAN
(See Closure Process)
CLOSURE PROCESS
(See also Interim Status Process, Post-Closure, TSDFs)
*CLOSURE OF INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
*CORRECTIVE ACTION BEYOND FACILITY BOUNDARY - FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REQUIREMENT
*LEASING OF PROPERTY PRIOR TO CLOSURE
*MIXED RADIOACTIVE AND HAZARDOUS WASTE, DISPOSAL OF
*PERSONNEL TRAINING DURING POST-CLOSURE
TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF USTs
3008(h) ORDERS OR POST-CLOSURE PERMITS AT CLOSING FACILITIES, USE OF
CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
DELAY OF CLOSURE PERIOD FOR HWM FACILITIES
DELAY OF CLOSURE RULE PREAMBLE LANGUAGE, CORRECTION
FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS - CERTIFYING CLOSURE
GROUNDWATER QUALITY AT CLOSURE
LAND DISPOSAL UNIT CLOSURE CLARIFICATION OF PROPOSED AND PROMULGATED RULES
PERMITTING UNITS OR FACILITIES THAT HAVE LOST INTERIM STATUS
POST-CLOSURE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS (ARMCO STEEL)
POST-CLOSURE PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS FOR NON-REGULATED UNITS
RCRA PROGRAM DIRECTIONS - PRIORITY TO ENVIRONMENTALLY SIGNIFICANT FACILITIES
RD&D PERMITS - POLICY GUIDANCE
RELEASES OF HAZARDOUS WASTE, RCRA APPLICABILITY TO
SUMMARY OF ASSISTANCE BRANCH PERMITTING COMMENTS
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT RETROFITTING AND TIME ALLOWED FOR CLOSURE
TRANSFER OF A HAZARDOUS WASTE STORAGE OPERATION TO A NEW SITE
WOOD PRESERVING AND SURFACE PROTECTION FACILITIES, CONTROLLING ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES FROM
Clean Closure
*CLEAN CLOSURE
*CLEAN CLOSURE OF INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT AND WASTE PILE
CLEAN CLOSURE AND DISPOSAL OF AN INCINERATOR
CLEANUP LEVELS FOR LEAD AND CADMIUM IN SOILS FOR CLEAN CLOSURE
CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE ISSUES FOR INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
DEMONSTRATING EQUIVALENCE OF PART 265 CLEAN CLOSURE WITH PART 264 REQUIREMENTS
EFFECTIVE DATES FOR CHARACTERISTIC & LISTED WASTES PER 03/19/87 CLEAN CLOSURE REGULATION
GROUNDWATER MONITORING AT CLEAN CLOSING SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT & WASTE PILE UNITS
REGULATORY INTERPRETATION OF OBJECTION TO CLEAN-CLOSURE EQUIVALENCY PETITION FOR STEEL ABRASIVES, INC.
SOIL BACKGROUND LEVELS AS CLEAN CLOSURE STANDARDS, USE OF
SOIL CLEANUPS FOR LEAD - CLEANUP STANDARDS FOR CLEAN CLOSURE
Closure Plan
*CLOSURE PLAN PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD FOR INTERIM STATUS FACILITIES
*CLOSURE PLANS - APPEALS
*CONTINGENT CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE PLANS FOR TANKS
* POST-CLOSURE PLANS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS
CALL-IN OF STORAGE AND TREATMENT APPLICATIONS
CLARIFICATION OF THE CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES
CLOSURE PLAN COMMENTS/ISSUES (CRUCIBLE STEEL) „.„„,"
CLOSURE PLAN FOR THE HAZARDOUS WASTE STORAGE UNITS AT VERTAC'S SHUTDOWN MANUFACTURING PLANT
DEADLINES APPLICABLE TO PROPOSED DELAY OF CLOSURE REGULATION, GUIDANCE
XREF
XREF
9484.1987(04)
9502.1986(10)
9528.1983(03)
9431.1988(02)
9523.1985(05)
9483.1989(05)
9502.00-7
9476.00-12
9476.1989(01)
9476.1989(02)
9477.1990(02)
9476.1985(02)
9476.1985(05)
9528.1986(08)
9522.1986(03)
9476.1985(04)
9501.1987(02)
9503.50-1A
9502.1987(05)
9523.00-17 .
9523.00-14
9523'. 00-12
9484.00-Sa
9528.1986(03)
9441.1986(28)
9476.1987(03)
9522.1988(01)
9488.1987(04)
9476.1988(023)
9476.1987(08)
9476.00-18
9476.00-16
9476.00-14
9476.1990(01)
9476.1988(033)
9502.1989(02)
9476.1987(07)
9476.1986(01a)
9483.1987(08)
9476.1988(03)
9528.1988(06) '
9476.1993(01)
9476.1984(05)
9488.1987(01)
9476.1988(04)
/ /
04/30/87
05/30/86
09/30/83
01/30/88
10/30/85
10/30/89
03/08/88
02/02/88
05/16/89
08/22/89
05/28/90
08/27/85
12/13/85
11/20/86,.,
11/20/86
09/25/85
.12/14/87
12/23/85
04/02/87
09/02/88
03/14/86 :
03/30/87
10/15/88
03/03/86
04/07/86
06/30/87
02/28/88
06/12/87
03/02/88
12/17/87
05/12/89
04/01/88
03/31/88
06/04/90
05/27/88
05/25/89
11/30/87
08/30/86
05/30/87
04/30/88
04/19/88
05/28/93
09/18/84
02/09/87
05/31/88
-------
5 ^T - Ttf '-f "H
07/02/96
KEYWORD IHOEX
Page Ho. 18
f
S--
»r«
DBUSTIHO P&miON'STBBL FACILITY, REQUIREMENTS 'FOR CLOSURE PLAN
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION '
PERMITTING UNITS OR FACILITIES THAT HAVE LOST INTERIM STATUS <
SUMMARY OF ASSISTANCE BRANCH PERMITTING COMMENTS
, SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS i '-.. -: > -1 -1 .
Closure Requirements
, CERTIFICATION OF CLOSURE \ i '-> i • K 1: s:^
•ESTIMATED CLOSURE DATES IN PART B PERMIT APPLICATIONS !
•FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS/CLOSURE COSTS '
•GENERATOR CLOSURE/FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR TANK SYSTEMS
•HAZARDOUS HASTE TANK CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE :
•RETROFITTING SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS :
CLARIFICATION OF THE CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS FOR HAZARDOUS HASTE MANAGEMENT! FACILITIES
S^ES^^
CLOSURE COST ESTIMATES :
CLOSURE COST ESTIMATES BASED ON THIRD PARTY COSTS '
CLOSURE ISSUES RELATED TO HOOD PRESERVING PLANTS i
CLOSURE OF A DOE SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT THAT LOST INTERIM STATUS
CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS AT FACILITIES HAVING DELISTING EXCLUSIONS REVOKED
CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DISPOSAL OF STORAGE TANKS ••
CLOSURE STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE LAND TREATMENT UNITS '
CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE REGULATIONS/PARTIAL CLOSURE 4EMELLE AL) ! ;
ESTIMATED CLOSURE DATES IN PERMIT APPLICATIONS '-
FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REGULATIONS RELATED TO BANKRUPTCY (LTV)
H™?™^ SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS * CLEAN CLOSED WASTE PILES. CODIFICATION RULE 12/01/87
NEUTRALIZATION SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, GROUNDWATER MONITORING FOR CLOSURE OF INTERIM-STATUS
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT CLOSURE, APPLICABILITY OF 3005 (i) OF RCRA TO S>JAiUi,
TEMPORARY PERIOD AND HOLDING DEFINED
i
Closure Standards
CLOSURE PERFORMANCE STANDARD
FACILITY TRANSFER/RECONSTRUCTION DURING INTERIM STATUS
POST-CLOSURE PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS FOR NON-REGULATED UNITS
Partial Closure , !
•AMENDING CLOSURE PLANS TO ADDRESS PARTIAL CLOSURE
•TANK REPLACEMENT
Permitting
•AMENDING CLOSURE PLANS TO ADDRESS PARTIAL CLOSURE -
•INTERIM STATUS CLOSURE CERTIFICATION
PERMITTING UNITS CREATED FOR FACILITY CLOSURE
Public Participation
•CLOSURE PLAN PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD FOR INTERIM STATUS FACILITIES
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CLOSURE PLAN APPROVAL
CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
(See Closure Process)
CLOSURE STANDARDS
(See Closure Process)
9433.1986(07)
9476. 1993 (02)
9528.1386(11)
I. —•-.; ,;9S23,00-18 -,
: : ' -•'."_: : ' J9523.00-15 ' t!
' i=- I-- i -r I i ii
9476.1987(05)
9523.1984(03) ;
9477. 1986 (11) J
9483.1989(01)
9476. 1986 (02) r
9476.1986(04) :
9476.1993(01) J
9476.1983(02)'
9476.1986(03) 1 :
' " 9477.1983(03) "
9477.1984(01)
9476.1984(04) "
9484.1986(02)
9476.1988(01) =
9483.1987(03)
9476.1991(01)
•9476.1986(01)
9523.1984(01)
9477.1986(12)
i 9522.1988(05)
9484.1986(03) i
9476.1987(01)
; ' 9522.1986(01) ;-
. . ,9476.00-13
-.-.." 9477.1986(01) ','
9521.1985(01)
9476.1985(01)
; 9477.1988(03) :='--
!9476.1985(01) :.-
9476.1984(03)
9476.1985(03) -.
--''•- T- 9476.1987(07) ^
." : "' 9476.1989(03)
03/18/86
06/04/93
12/10/86
03/14/89
03/30/88
09/30/87
04/30/84
06/30/86
04/30/89
09/30/86
10/30/86
05/28/93
01/11/83
10/08/86
12/09/83
01/12/84
08/07/84
04/02/86
01/29/88
04/08/87
05/02/91
05/08/86
01/17/84
07/23/86
11/30/88
04/09/86
06/09/87
09/01/86
02/08/88
01/03/86
09/25/85
06/30/85
07/30/88
06/30/85
03/30/84
09/11/85
11/30/87
09/07/89
XREF
XREF
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 19
COAL
(See Mining Waste)
COAL TAR/COKE
(See also Hazardous Waste Fuels)
*COKE AND COAL TAR RECYCLABLE MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS
COAL TAR DECANTER SLUDGE WASTE PILE (TOLEDO COKE)
COAL TAR DECANTER SLUDGE WASTE PILE (TOLEDO COKE)
REGULATORY STATUS OF CENTRIFUGE UNDERFLOW WASTES
REGULATORY STATUS OF COAL TAR DISTILLATES
WASTE-DERIVED FUELS AT IRON AND STEEL MILLS AS PRODUCTS OR WASTE FUELS, INFORMATION REQUIRED
WASTES GENERATED BY COKE AND COAL TAR PLANTS
COLLECTION PROGRAMS
(See Household Hazardous Waste)
COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS
(See Listed Hazardous Waste)
COMPATIBILITY
(See also Containers, Liners, Minimum Technology Requirements, Tank System)
BULKING AND CONSOLIDATING SHIPMENTS OF COMPATIBLE WASTES WITH DIFFERENT HAZARDOUS CODES
CONTAINERS STORING HAZARDOUS WASTE, REQUIREMENTS
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
TRD INDICATING THAT ETHANOL AND STAINLESS STEEL ARE COMPATIBLE
COMPLIANCE
(See also Enforcement, Interim Status Process)
*GROUNDWATER MONITORING - COMPLIANCE PERIOD/POST-CLOSURE CARE PERIOD
*RCRA COMPLIANCE ORDERS
213 OF HSWA, REQUIREMENTS - PERMIT ISSUANCE AND CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE
EPA AUTHORITY TO CONSIDER PERMIT APPLICANT HISTORY OF COMPLIANCE WITH RCRA
PERMIT COMPLIANCE/ENFORCEMENT ISSUES (REG. X)
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, THERMEX ENERGY/RADIAN
PHYSICAL COMPLIANCE IN GROUNDWATER MONITORING, DEFINITION
Inspections
*INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS
*LABORATORY AUDIT INSPECTION
*RCRA INSPECTIONS
COMPLIANCE MONITORING
(See Groundwater Monitoring)
COMPLIANCE SCHEDULES
(See also Corrective Action, Enforcement, State Authorization)
COMPLIANCE SCHEDULES IN RCRA PERMITS ,
CORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES, NATIONAL PRIORITIES
INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM (IRP) - DOD
XREF
XREF
9441.
9441.
9441.
9444.
9441,
9441,
9442
1989(04)
1987(75)
1987(98)
1993(02)
1992(20)
1986(08)
1987(02)
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
9524.1984(01)
9502.1986(04)
9502.1986(20)
02/28/89
09/04/81
12/24/87
04/20/93
07/09/92
01/24/86
07/24/87
XREF
9461.1985(01)
9482.1986(01)
9523.00-12
9483.1987(12)
XREF
9481.1988(03)
9523.1986(03)
9522.1985(03)
9523.1991(01)
9522.00-3
9521.1987(01)
9481.1985(04)
9483.1987(06)
9431.1987(03)
9504.1985(01)
/ /
09/19/85
01/21/86
03/30/873?
07/29/81
/ /
04/30/88
08/30/86
07/05/85
03/13/91
11/13/87
08/07/87
10/30/85
05/30/87
07/30/87
05/31/85
10/05/84
02/13/85
12/08/86
-------
Ji i-I S! '=» ••
a jjjjp |j! |; hi: jj
iji^i::: v ..;^.:::;:;; ^:: : : :;; s :::;r:::- :~ :;i :
I =*-" ' r-= ^i " =.= 1 1| i- _£ =s -= ^-C - «r ?S ^ fc^ , = ^ ^ r= T J 5 ^ .=
I 07/02/96 ". -J.. ._.-'."'
! : ii«!i! (j! i: iii! v
IHSTACLATIOM RESTORATiON PROGRAMUIRP) -- DOD,
*- -- _. 1= f=__'_-,
i^:; COMPRESSED OAS CYLINDERS s i i ' -
[5,;^^ (See Hazardous Haste Identification)
CONSTRUCTION
f== .3 -.=--____ ^ %s
1* ' :f"lfi -'• --
t:: :
KB1TKORO IMOEX
I::-" " VI ji
";-i -T
iiti
I
(See also Interim Status Procesa)
*CONSTRUCTION DURING INTERIM STATUS! - RECONSTRUCTION LIMIT
SS5S-JSLSS SSS55 — «• ™ -
* PERMIT MODIFICATION
*RCRA PERMITS FOR MOBILE TREATMENT UNITS
CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW INCINERATOR HITH THE CHANGES DURING INTERIM STATUS
DESTRUCTION OF DIOXIN CONTAMINATED SOIL USING MOBILE INCINERATION
IN-EXISTENCE AND UNDER CONSTRUCTION-DEFINITIONS ""WW"™
ftZIov^^nf ° BED "EDIA AND CmNGBS "^^ INTER1H STATUS
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
New Unit
BIF RULE APPLIED TO NEWLY REGULATED UNITS AT INTERIM STATUS FAC1I ITTPC:
srsssfsssffsr "" ™
PERMITTING UNITS CREATED FOR FACILITY CLOSURE
CONTAINED- IN
*GROUNDWATER "CONTAINED IN" POLICY
*HAZARDOUS WASTE IDENTIFICATION
CLARIFICATION OF THE RCRA "CONTAINED-IN" POLICY
^ MEDIA CONTflMINATED WITH Rc^.Ljgjgp HAzaRuoug WflSTE
SOME UNITS HAVE CLOSED
CONTAINERS
*ADDING ABSORBENT TO WASTE CONTAINERS
ABSORBENTS FOR CONTAINERIZED LIQUID HAZARDOUS WASTES, USE OF
TOEATMENT °F W^TES ON-SITE/PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
CLEANING OTHER THAN TRIPLE RINSING - PAPER BAGS
t^&^^.'VS&SS"0"' ™ DISPOSAL OF
ACTION/PERMIT JSSUES - U.S. ARMY - ABERDEEN PROVING GROUNDS
LAB PACKS - LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS ASPECTS
Page Ho. 20
J ! ii- •" - I - (: !
9502.1986(20) 12/08/86
XRBP
XREF
9528:1987(04)
9528.1987(03)
9481.1985(05)
9525.1985(01)
9523.1986(01)
9528.1986(07)
9488.1986(05)
9432.1989(02)
9444.1986(28)
9523,00-12
9523.00-15
9528.1991(01)
9432.1985(04)
9487.1981(01)
9476.1985(03)
XREF
9441.1990(13b)
9441.1990(130)
9441.1995(32)
9441.1989(30)
9444.1995(01)
9441.1992(34)
XREF
-9453.1990(02) 4
9483.1988(14)
9453.1988(02)
9441.1992(12)
9453.1986(05)
9487.1985(05)
9453.1986(01)
9482.1994(01)
9482.1995(01)
9487.1986(12)
9441.1985(15)
9482.1985(01)
9482.1986(01)
9502.1986(09) '.
9451.1986(01) i
9441.1986(02) '
9551. 1990 U^k
/ /
03/30/87
03/30/87
10/30/85
10/30/85
03/30/86
09/19/86
04/24/86
05/16/89
12/05/86
03/30/87
03/30/88
08/07/91
08/30/85
03/12/81
09/11/85
/ /
05/31/90
05/31/90
09/15/95
06/19/89
; 02/17/95
: 10/15/92
/ /
07/30/90
06/30/88
01/30/88
OS/31/92
08/30/86
09/20/85
04/16/86
09/02/94
06/30/95
12/30/86
05/20/85
,11/26/85
,01/21/86
05/08/86
103/17/86
!01/07/86
i08/08/90
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 2X
ON-SITE TREATMENT BY GENERATORS UNDER 262.34
ON-SITE TREATMENT EXEMPTION, REINTERPRETATION OF ™,,TMDDO
PERMITTING OF TREATMENT ACTIVITIES IN A GENERATOR'S ACCUMULATION TANKS OR CONTAINERS
PESTICIDE DISPOSAL BY FARMERS AND CONTAINER MANAGEMENT
REGULATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TRANSFER OPERATIONS
REGULATORY STATUS OF BATTERY CARCASSES
REGULATORY STATUS OF MERCURY BATTERIES
RESIDUES REMAINING IN EMPTY CONTAINERS, BURNING OF
SATELLITE ACCUMULATION
SATELLITE ACCUMULATION AREA AND REGULATIONS
SPECIAL MATERIALS DISPOSED OF IN LANDFILLS: BATTERIES, CAPACITORS, LAB PACKS
TANK TREATMENT PROCESSES
THIRD THIRD LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
%5^^^%£^%-%£ "ASTES THAT CONTAIN UNCONTAMINATED OR RADIOACTIVE LEAD
TREATMENT IN ACCUMULATION TANKS AND CONTAINERS ALLOWED FOR ALL GENERATORS SUBJECT TO 262.34
TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE FROM LARGE QUANTITY GENERATORS
WOOD PRESERVINGSANDRSURFACE PROTECTION FACILITIES, CONTROLLING ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES FROM
Empty
*CONTAINER RESIDUE, REGULATION OF
*EMPTY CONTAINERS
*EMPTY CONTAINERS, POURING ADDITIONAL WASTE FROM
*WASTE IDENTIFICATION
CONTAXNED IN THE RECYCLED USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS
CONTAINERS THAT HELD COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS, DEFINITION OF EMPTY
CONTAINERS, TRIPLE RINSING FOR FERTILIZER
CONTAINERS, TRIPLE RINSING OF EMPTY
CONTAINERS TYPES OF EMPTY - RESIDUE HANDLING
DISCARDED OFF-GAS PIPING, EQUIPMENT, AND OFF-GAS SCRUBBER SOLUTION FROM A TANK SYSTEM
EMPTY CONTAINER RULE APPLIED TO TANKER OR VACUUM TRUCKS
EMPTY CONTAINERS REGULATORY STATUS
EMPTY DRUMS CONTAINING METALLIC NICKEL OR NICKEL OXIDE
EMPTY DRUMS FOR REUSE AND RECONDITIONING, REGULATION OF
EMPTY TANK CARS THAT CONTAINED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT
INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT THAT FORMERLY CONTAINED HAZARDOUS WASTE
PESTICIDE DISPOSAL BY FARMERS AND CONTAINER MANAGEMENT
^S^^^S^^S^^S^^ CONTAINED A SODIUM CYANIDE PESTICXDE
RESIDUES REMAINING IN EMPTY CONTAINERS, BURNING OF
STEAM-SPRAYING OF AN EMPTY TANK
TKI^-K,™ K^™,^ ™. ~ CONTAINERS HOLDING RESIDUES FROM THE INCINERATION OF ACUTE HAZARDOUS WASTES
UNRINSED CONTAINERS WHICH FORMERLY CONTAINED AN UNUSED FORMULATION OF PENTACHLOROPHENOL
CONTAINMENT
(See Secondary Containment)
CONTAINMENT BUILDINGS •
*CONTAINMENT BUILDINGS AS GENERATOR ACCUMULATION UNITS
*CONTAINMENT BUILDINGS AS INDEPENDENT HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT UNITS
9453.1987(03)
9453.1987(08)
9453.1986(04)
9457.1987(01)
9461.1989(01)
9441.1993(23)
9443.1994(02)
9441.1986(04)
9453.1989(07)
9453.1987(01)
9487.1986(13)
9483.1990(02)
9551.1990(15)
9551.1991(13)
9441.1987(52)
9453.1986(07)
9453.1991(02)
9441.1990(30)
9441.1986(28)
9441.1983(07)
9441.1986(98)
9441.1984(38)
9441.1987(773)
9444.1989(05)
9592.1994(08)
9441.1984(26)
9441.1984(18)
9441.1983(10)
9441.1984(25)
9442.1993(01)
9441.1986(02)
9432.1990(03)
9441.1985(19)
9441.1980(01)
9441.1985(41)
9441.1991(16)
9457.1987(01)
9442.1993(02)
9442.1993(05)
9441.1986(04)
9441.1990(10)
9441.1984(34)
9431.1993(01)
9444.1986(03)
07/01/87
12/15/87
07/25/86
03/25/87
01/03/89 '
11/10/93
02/04/94
01/07/86
07/13/89
02/22/87
12/31/86
08/15/90
12/20/90
12/20/91
06/26/87
12/05/86
09/20/91
10/30/90
04/07/86
09/01/83
12/31/86
12/30/84
09/30/87
07/21/89
09/12/94
09/11/84
08/01/84
12/13/83
09/10/84
09/20/93
01/07/86
09/13/90
05/31/85
05/30/80
12/12/85
10/22/91
03/25/87
10/07/93
12/23/93
01/07/86
04/10/90
11/28/84
07/28/93
02/12/86
XREF
XREF
9453.1994(01)
9482.1993(01)
09/30/94
11/30/93
-------
I
I
;-' -is is? : I! ill E! i
!!!!
1 i ^ i r m - B Js g =jj *
i 8 !l
" il tl T
_ 07/02/96
KBYtfORD IHOEX
I *s:i :-TV: : *
liSl 5!
PageHo. 22
CO.JTAHIMATED;;GROWiD«ftTER
(See;Hazardou3 Haste Identification)
— _ CONTAMINATBDIiMEDIA , :
=^- r r
K; (See:Hazardous Haste Identification
! I ! :
: _ CONTAMINATED»SOIL " ." -.'_._
(Seehazardous Waste Identification) (See also Corrective Action)
CONTINGENCY PLAN
XREP
XREF
XREF
CONTINGENCY PLANS-INFORMATION SUBMISSION - ' -
DRIPPAGE IN WOOD PRESERVING STORAGE YARDS ' '
Spills
n^n™,™^ LEACHATE (F039> WASTE CODE AS IT APPLIES TO CONTAMINATION FROM SPILLS
RESPONSES TO ACCIDENTAL SPILLS OF LISTED OR CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTES
CONTINUING RELEASES
(See Corrective Action)
CONTINUOUS EMISSIONS MONITORS (CEMs)
(See Boilers and Industrial Furnaces)
CORPORATE GUARANTEE •
(See Financial Responsibility)
CORRECTIVE ACTION ' ; ;
^CORRE^V^^ — ""It -ndiS
•CORRECTIVE ACTION AND PERMITS
•CORRECTIVE ACTION AUTHORITY AT FACILITIES THAT LOSE INTERIM STATUS
•CORRECTIVE ACTION BEYOND FACILIT
•CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR INTERIM ST
•CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR NEW FACILITIES
•CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR UIC WELLS
•CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR UIC WELLS
•CORRECTIVE ACTION IN PERMITS
•CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS WHILE SEEKING A MAJOR PERMIT MODIFICATION
•LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS: SOILS AND DEBRIS FROM RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION
•PETROLEUM CONTAMINATED MEDIA AND DEBRIS UNDER THE TC UST TEMPORARY DEFERAL
APPLICABILITY OF "SUPERFUND LDR GUIDES"
ByPRODUCT_MATERIAL AND MIXED WASTE, AEA AND DOE INTERFACE
0 SOILS CONTAMINATED
XREF ;_• / /
:9474.4984i(01) 09/10/84
9489.1991(02) 05/31/91
9444.1991(06) 11/01/91
9471.1986*(01) 09/29/86
XREP
XREF
XREF i
CORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES, ISSUES AND NATIONAL PRIORITIES FOR
CORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES, NATIONAL PRIORITIES
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (CAP), CONTENTS AND USE OF
CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL FACILITIES AND IRP ACTIVITIES
[E^^
XREF
9502
9525
9528
-9502
,9484
9481
9502
9527
9521
9502.
9551.
9441.
9551.
9441.
9441.
9528.
9502.
9502.
9502.
9502.
.1987(01)
.1988(01)
.1987(01)
.1986(10)^
.1986(07)
.1986(10)
.1986(07)
.1986(02)
.1986(06a)
.1986(03)
.1988(14)
,1990(31)
,1991(15)
1986(46)
1993(16)
1987(02)
1986(01)
1986(04)
1987(04
1986^
01/30/87
02/28/88
01/30/87
' 05/30/86
07/30/86
10/30/86
04/30/86
04/30/86
06/30/86
01/30/86
12/30/88
10/01/90
01/07/91
06/02/86
09/15/93
03/11/87
01/08/86
02/13/86
03/13/87
08/22/86
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 23
CORRECTIVE ACTION TECHNOLOGY, HQ SUPPORT
CORRECTIVE ACTION/PERMIT ISSUES - U.S. ARMY - ABERDEEN PROVING GROUNDS
DOD'S IRP PROGRAM AND RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION
FACILITIES NOT SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION
FIBER OPTICS FOR IN-SITU MONITORING
FINANCIAL ASSURANCE FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION BEYOND FACILITY BOUNDARIES
INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM (IRP) - DOD
PARTIAL PERMITTING OF INCINERATOR UNIT (DOW)
PERMITTING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS AFFECTING COMPLIANCE WITH LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS A^T,,tTTC.Q
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLANS AND DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES FOR RCRA GROUND-WATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION ACTIVITIES
RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM
RCRA PERMIT REAUTHORIZATION ISSUES IN REGION III
RCRA PERMITS WITH HSWA CONDITIONS - JOINTLY ISSUED PERMITS
RCRA PROGRAM DIRECTIONS - PRIORITY TO ENVIRONMENTALLY SIGNIFICANT FACILITIES
SOIL CLEANUPS FOR LEAD - CLEANUP STANDARDS FOR CLEAN CLOSURE
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNITS, INFORMATION ON
STATE AUTHORIZATION TO REGULATE HAZARDOUS COMPONENTS OF RADIOACTIVE MIXED WASTES
SUMMARY OF ASSISTANCE BRANCH PERMITTING COMMENTS
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT CLOSURE, APPLICABILITY OF 3005 (i) OF RCRA TO
TREATMENT SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, REGULATORY OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO WOOD PRESERVERS
UIC CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS, IMPLEMENTATION
USE OF THE PROPOSED SUBPART S CORRECTIVE ACTION RULE AS GUIDANCE PENDING PROMULGATION OF THE FINAL RULE
VULNERABILITY GUIDANCE
WOOD PRESERVING AND SURFACE PROTECTION FACILITIES, CONTROLLING ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES FROM
ZINC OXIDE RECLAIMED FROM KILNS
Administrative Order
CONCURRENCE ON THE USE OF SECTION 7003 TO COMPEL THE CLEAN-UP OF AN OIL SPILL
CORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES • „„,,.„ ,^^T™
GUIDANCE ON HOW TO COORDINATE PERMIT 3004 (U) AND ORDER 3008 (H) REQUIREMENTS FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION
IS A SECTION 3008 (h) ENFORCEMENT ORDER AN APPROPRIATE MECHANISM FOR APPROVING A CAMU?
PREVIOUSLY UNREGULATED SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT - CORRECTIVE ACTION ORDERS
REGION III ISSUES ON SECTION 3004 (U) AUTHORITY
Cleanup Standards
"CLASSIFICATION OF LEACHATE CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER
*REINJECTED GROUNDWATER RESULTING FROM CORRECTIVE ACTION TREATMENT
APP^ICABLE'LAND^ISro^ CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER UNDER CERCLA AND RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
CONCURRENCE ON THE USE OF SECTION 7003 TO COMPEL THE CLEAN-UP OF AN OIL SPILL
CORRECTIVE ACTION RULE
FEDERAL POLICY REGARDING DIOXIN DISPOSAL
INTERIM SOIL CLEAN-UP LEVELS FOR LEAD AT SUPERFUND SITES
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLEANUP OF FINAL NPL SITES UNDER RCRA
SUBTITLE C IMPERMEABLE CAP REQUIREMENT FOR ON-SITE CONTAINMENT OF WOOD PRESERVING WASTES
Continuing Releases
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (CAP) , CONTENTS AND USE OF . .
MKCERHRFGW»DrMEWSpM« TO "DISALLOW CONTINUED USE OF THE CORRECTIVE ACTION MANAGEMENT UNIT (CAMU) PROVISION"
EFFECTS OF TOE REG^ONS^OR CORRECTIVE ACTION MANAGEMENT UNITS (CAMUs) ON THE MANAGEMENT OF "AS -GENERATED" HAZARDOUS WASTES
GUIDANCE ON THE USE OF THE CORRECTIVE ACTION MANAGEMENT UNIT CONCEPT
IS A SECTION 3008 (h) ENFORCEMENT ORDER AN APPROPRIATE MECHANISM FOR APPROVING A CAMU?
9502.1986(19)
9502.1986(09)
9502.1986(17)
9502.1986(05)
9502.1987(09)
9502.1989(01)
9502.1986(20)
9522.1985(04)
9502.1986(11)
9445.1993(06)
9431.1991(03)
9541.1985(01)
9502.1987(06)
9501.1987(02)
9502.1989(02)
9502.1986(013)
9541.1986(20)
9523.00-18
9523.00-15
9476.1987(01)
9484.1987(12)
9502.00-3
9502.1991(01)
9481.1987(01)
9441.1986(28)
9444.1988(02a)
9504.1991(01)
9502.00-2
9502.1989(04)
9502.1995(01)
9502.1986(07a)
9502.1987(02)
9554.1991(02)
9554.1991(03)
9553.1989(02)
9554.1989(05)
9504.1991(01)
9502.1988(01)
9444.1987(26)
9502.1990(01)
9502.1990(02)
9554.1990(15)
9502.1987(04)
9502.1995(03)
9502.1993(01)
9502.1992(02)
9502.1995(01)
10/07/86
05/08/86
09/29/86
03/24/86
09/03/87
03/02/89
12/08/86
08/30/85
06/16/86
07/07/93
05/17/91
03/06/85
06/30/87
12/14/87
05/25/89
01/23/86
10/20/86
03/14/89
03/30/88
06/09/87
11/25/87
08/04/86
03/27/91
02/25/87
04/07/86
01/26/88
11/07/91
04/18/86
08/10/89
02/17/95
04/30/86
03/31/87
01/01/91
04/01/91
11/13/89
12/20/89
11/07/91
08/23/88
07/02/87
05/07/90
07/11/90
09/26/90
03/13/87
10/18/95
05/04/93
08/31/92
02/17/95
-------
" I-" "! T! ••.--
:! Li
: ~™ ' i r « «
;i iNi 'r ii
67/02/96
lit:
i!»
is
RCRA Facility Assessment (RFA)
RCRA; FACILITY ASSESSMENTS, 'IMPLEMENTATION
Regulated Unit I j; i ! M
~
Release
•CORRECTIVE ACTION AUTHORITIES
•ENFORCEMENT USING 3008 (h) AUTHORITY AND 3013 ORDERS
3008 (h) OF THE SOLID HASTE DISPOSAL ACT. INTERPRETATION OF
°F ™E USE RND WWGEMBNT OF MOUNTAIN HOME AIR FORCE BASE TIRE TRAINING PITS
S
CORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES
ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES FROM WOOD PRESERVING PLANTS
FEDERAL FACILITIES INVENTORY UNDER RCRA 3016
FIRE TRAINING PITS, REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR
SrSEVTH^^^
PIPELINE TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE !
RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION PROCEDURES AND AUTHORITIES -
REGION III ISSUES ON SECTION 3004 (U) AUTHORITY
RELEASES OF HAZARDOUS WASTE, RCRA APPLICABILITY TO
= SSS SEs^JSLSS^0 F CORRECTIVE ACTION m 3004 (u) •
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
»^ED«oES AN° POST-CLOSIJRE PERMITS, APPLICATION OF NOVEMBER 1988 DEADLINE TO
WOOD PRESERVING AND SURFACE PROTECTION FACILITIES, CONTROLLING ENVIRONMENTAL^ELEASES FROM
Remediation
DRAFT SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN FOR NH PLATING COMPANY
SSfS?™JTIOH °F RCRA REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO THE REMEDIATION OF CONTAMiNATION
QUALIFICATIONS NECESSARY TO PERFORM ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION TASKS U"U*MiNArION
Solid Waste Management Units (SWMUs)
•CORRECTIVE ACTION AUTHORITIES
SSS1S^^PS!!S^?^
FINANCIAL ASSURANCE FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION
GROUNDWATER MONITORING AT REGULATED UNITS NEAR SWMUs THAT HAVE IMPACTED GROUND WATPR
IMMEDIATE IMPLEMENTATION OF NEW CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS PACTED GROUND "ATER
POST-CLOSURE PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS FOR NON-REGULATED UNITS
POST-CLOSURE PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS FOR NON-REGULATED UNITS
REGION III ISSUES ON SECTION 3004 (U) AUTHORITY
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNIT (SWMU) DETERMINATION
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNIT DEFINED FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION UNDER 3004 (u)
S SS
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
S^^CORRECTIVE ACTION RIA FACILITY DATA BASE
3
M02.00-4
08/21/8:6J =
9481.1198-7(05); 06/17/sM
9502.1986(02) 01/31/86
9502.1995(02)
9S02.:1986(18)
9502.1985(09)
9489.1988(02)
9441.1995(06)
;9502.00-2
:9502.1986(06)i
9444.1986(07)
9502.1987(03)
9489.1987(02)
9481.1987(02)
9502.1985(06)
9432.1986(08)
9502.1986(02)
9502.1987(02)
9502.1987(05)
9502.00-6
9502. 1986 (Ola)
9523.00-14
9501.1985(01)
9441.1986(28)
9486.1989(01)
9476.1991(01)
9502.1995(03) i
9551.1990(05)
9433.1990(06)
9502.1989(03)
9502.1994(01)
9502.1995(02) i
9502.1985(04)
9502.1986(14) •
9502.1986(09)
9502.1987(03) .
9502.1986(13)
9481.1987(05)
9502.1985(01)
9476.1985(04) :
9521.1985(01) '
9502.1987(02)
9483.1991(01) j
9502.1987(07)"
9502.00-6
9502.1986(01a)
9523. 00-14 ^fck
9502.1987(^^1
02/28/95
09/30/86
12/16/85
08/11/88
02/21/95
04/18/86:
04/15/86
04/07/86
03/06/87
07/22/87
03/10/87.
10/29/85
04/30/86;
01/31/86
03/31/87
04/02/87
07/02/87
01/23/86
03/14/86
10/01/85
04/07/86
03/30/89
05/02/91
10/18/95
10/09/90
11/27/90
06/15/89
09/14/94
02/28/95
06/30/85
08/22/86
05/08/86
03/06/87
08/22/86
06/17/87
02/06/85
09/25/85
09/25/85
03/31/87 "
01/04/91
07/24/87 !
07/02/87 i
01/23/86 '
03/14/86
08/11/87
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 25
WOOD TREATMENT CYLINDER CREOSOTE SUMPS
WOOD TREATMENT CYLINDER CREOSOTE SUMPS
WOOD TREATMENT PLANT DRIP AREAS AS SWMUs, REGULATION OF
Voluntary Cleanups
VOLUNTARY CLEANUP CONSTRAINTS
VOLUNTARY CORRECTIVE ACTION
CORRECTIVE ACTION MANAGEMENT UNIT
(See Corrective Action)
CORROSIVE WASTES
(See Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
COST
(See Financial Responsibility)
COST ESTIMATES
(See Financial Responsibility)
COVER DESIGN
(See Final Cover)
CREOSOTE
(See Wood Treatment, Hazardous Waste Identification)
CYANIDE
(See Hazardous Waste Identification) (See also SW-846)
DATA
CORRECTIVE ACTION TECHNOLOGY, HQ SUPPORT
SWMU CORRECTIVE ACTION RIA FACILITY DATA BASE
Noncompliance
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS SECTION 270.30 (1)(10)
DE MINIMIS
(See also Listed Hazardous Waste)
•TECHNICAL GRADE SOLVENT FORMULATIONS AND THE F003 LISTING
*TRUCK TRANSPORT OF WASTEWATER FOR PURPOSES OF SECTION 261.3 (a) (2) (iv) (A)
DETERMINATION OF EQUIVALENT TREATMENT (DET) FOR 8 OF THE WASTE CODES FROM A TOLUENE DIISOCYANATE (TDI) TREATABILITY GROUP
DRIPPAGE IN WOOD PRESERVING STORAGE YARDS
REGULATION OF SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS UNDER THE SEPTEMBER 10, 1992 RECYCLED USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS
REGULATORY STATUS OF PERSONNEL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
9502.1986(15)
9441.1986(69)
9502.1985(02)
9502.1988(02)
9502.1987(11)
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
9502.1986(19)
9502.1987(08)
XREF
9444.
9441.
9554.
9489.
9592.
9441.
1994(05)
1991(13)
1994(06)
1991(02)
1994(07)
1989(02)
09/12/86
09/12/86
06/17/85
02/18/88
12/21/87
10/07/86
08/11/87
9524.1988(01) 02/23/88
06/30/94
07/01/91
10/24/94
05/31/91
07/22/94
01/03/89
-------
*==£--= =-*J?3=-^¥r: °= ssr'",.-':V_- ^/:; Ss i^^h -j- ?i^l-- = ^f^-»*Y<*^ r^^J; ^P=5y=--ir---i= ^ :-. i<
'iSjiBi:
r-i--**•=:-*»--*• -*::"- = =•*»"-•;- -M "^r^fgL^ j^^npB^vm :^V :~n=it-°-5*i» t™ 3N= v^r ^=e -;-= - v- ~=^i_ ?r=i= M *ii.i=» is-fc - :=S £p*
I !
07/02/96
i, ,, Page Jto,,; 26, ,
1 i
DEADLINES _ • j; ^
(Sea Permit Process) (See also Stata Authorization]
DEFINITION ~ ~ '
(See=Solid Haste, Hazardous Waafe IdpntiEication, Regulated Unit) 's !
DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY : !
(See Permit Process) ; ,«,,,,
DELISTING
(See also Appendix VIII, Appendix IX, Hazardous Waste Identification, Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
*DELISTING BY STATESi i ; : »
*DELISTING OF K051 WASTE AT PETROLEUM REFINERY - EFFECT ON INTERIM STATUS
*DELISTING PETITIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTES FROM THE PETROLEUM INDUSTRY
ADOPTION OF TCLP FOR DELISTING DEMONSTRATIONS
CHLORINATED DIOXIN WASTES (F023)
COMBINATION OF SLUDGES FROM ALL IMPOUNDMENTS TO DETERMINE WASTE VOLUME FOR VHS ANALYSIS
CONTAMINATED SOIL AND DEBRIS TREATED REPLACEMENT UNDER A TREATABILITY VARIANCE
CYANIDE FURNACE CRUCIBLES TREATMENT
DELISTING ACTION - STATUS OF HOLLOMAN AIR FORCE BASE
DELISTING CRITERIA/LEACHATE LEVELS -
DELISTING OF WASTE BY AUTHORIZED STATES
DELISTING OF WASTE GENERATED FROM 2INC PHOSPHATING ON CARBON STEEL :, '
DELISTING PETITION - FUJI PHOTO FILM WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE
DELISTING PETITION FOR INCINERATOR ASH .'-
DELISTING PETITION INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDUES FROM INCINERATION OF 2,4,5-T'AND SILVEX PESTICIDES
DELISTING PETITION OF NITROGEN TETROXIDE RINSATE
DELISTING PETITION, USE OF VHS MODEL
DELISTING PETITION-STEEL FACILITY, REQUIREMENTS FOR CLOSURE PLAN
DELISTING PETITIONS, PROCEDURES FOR PROCESSING
DELISTING POLICY ALLOWS EXCLUSION OF SEPARATE WASTE TREATMENT UNITS AT MULTI-UNIT FACILITIES
DELISTING RESIDUE FROM TREATMENT OF LISTED WASTES '-- ' !
DELISTING TESTING REQUIREMENTS, CYANIDE AND OTHER WASTES, STEEL INDUSTRY '
DELISTING, INTERIM STATUS, AND SAMPLING ISSUES AT U.S. NAMEPLATE COMPANY
DESTRUCTION OF DIOXIN CONTAMINATED SOIL USING MOBILE INCINERATION
DETECTION LIMIT REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION ON APPENDIX VIII COMPOUNDS FOR A DELISTING PETITION ;
DIOXIN-CONTAINING WASTE RINSEATES, DISPOSAL BY DEEP WELL INJECTION ;' -
ELECTROPLATING SLUDGE, EXCLUSION PETITION
ENFORCEMENT OF APPLICABLE RCRA REGULATIONS AT FACILITIES WITH PENDING DELISTING PETITIONS
ENFORCEMENT OF APPLICABLE RCRA REGULATIONS AT FACILITIES WITH PENDING DELISTING REGULATIONS
EVALUATION OF DELISTING PETITIONS-INFORMATION REQUIRED
EXCLUSION FROM REGULATION FOR CHARACTERISTIC AND LISTED WASTES - LEACHATE LEVELS
EXCLUSION OF WASTE GENERATED AT INDIVIDUAL FACILITIES (DELISTING)
F006 LISTING FOR PICKLING AND ETCHING WASTES AND DELISTING ISSUES
GENERATOR LIABILITY FOR DELISTED WASTE RELEASES
GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION AS A BASIS TO DENY A DELISTING PETITION
HAZARDOUS WASTE LISTING FOR F006 WASTE
HSWA EFFECT ON STATE DELISTING DECISIONS
K035 LISTING AND DELISTING ISSUES:GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
LIME SLUDGE IMPOUNDMENT SLUDGE, DELISTING OF
MAGNESIUM SULFATE VS. ALUMINUM SULFATE DELISTING PETITION •
MATERIALS CONTAMINATED WITH PESTICIDE PRODUCTS "
K061 WASTES IN SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT-DELISTING PETITION
XREP
XREF
XREF
-
"""
i'-JS
^
_j^
:::
"f"
34 i
£tj
TJ!
XREF
9541.1986(24)
9433.1986(12)
9433.1994(03)
9433,1990(03)
9444.1985(16)
9433.1987(07)
9551.1990(05)
9433.1990(05)
9433.1987(16)
9433.1986(01)
9542.1980(04)
9441.1984(24)'
9433.1991(01)
9433.1991(03):
9433. '1987 (26)
9433.1990(07)
9433.1985(05);
9433.1986(07)
9433.1987(15)
9433.1987(22)!
9441.1981(05);
9433.1984(06):
9433.1987(03)
9433.1986(10)
9433.1986(19)
9444. 1985(14) "~
9433.1984(05)^
9433.1987(14)
9504.1987(01)
9433.1986(04)
9441.1986(03):
9542.1982(01)
9444.1987(55)
9433.1985(04)
9433.1987(08)
9441.1986(78)
9433.1985(02),
9433.1987(27)^
9484.1986(05)
9433.1990(01)!
9444.1987(40)'
9433. 1987 U^^
/ /
10/30/86
04/30/86
11/30/94
06/14/90
09/26/85
04/13/87
10/09/90
09/26/90
07/31/87
01/07/86
10/31/80
09/06/84
03/07/91
07/10/91
10/28/87
12/21/90
11/27/85
03/18/86
07/28/87
10/02/87
04/14/81
12/18/84
02/25/87
04/24/86
12/09/86
'09/10/85'
12/11/84
07/20/87
07/20/87
02/14/86
01/07/86
05/25/82
12/28/87
10/23/85
04/24/87
10/12/86
05/16/85
12/11/87
05/23/86
05/24/90
09/09/87
08/07/87
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 27
MIXTURE OF F003 AND A SOLID WASTE AND DELISTING REQUIREMENTS
MIXTURES OF SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTES
PETITION TO WITHDRAW K090 AND K091 LISTINGS
PROCESS WASTE DELISTED BY THE STATE DESIGNATES THE WASTE NON-HAZARDOUS WITHIN THE STATE
SOIL CONTAMINATED WITH TOLUENE DIISOCYANATE (TDD
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR DELISTING PETITION
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR GENERATED FROM PORCELAIN ENAMEL INDUSTRY, DELISTING OF
SUBSURFACE FATE AND TRANSPORT MODEL
TEMPORARY AND INFORMAL DELISTINGS AND HSWA EFFECTS ON BOTH
WASTES FROM BRIGHT DIPPING UNDER THE REINTERPRETED F006 LISTING
Temporary Exclusion
*DELISTING OF K051 WASTE AT PETROLEUM REFINERY - EFFECT ON INTERIM STATUS
RCRA 3001 (f) (2) (b) AND STATES' EXCLUSION OF WASTES FROM REGULATION AS HAZARDOUS
RCRA 3001 (f) (2) (b) AND STATES' EXCLUSION OF WASTES FROM REGULATION AS HAZARDOUS
REGULATORY STATUS OF FACILITIES PREVIOUSLY GRANTED TEMPORARY EXCLUSIONS
SLUDGE WASTE HANDLING IF TEMP. EXCLUSION IS WITHDRAWN / FUTURE METALS RECOVERY-STEEL FACILITY
STATUS OF FACILITY WHERE A TEMPORARY DELISTING EXCLUSION WAS NEVER GRANTED
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS HOLDING ONLY K-WASTES GENERATED UNDER A TEMPORARY EXCLUSION
TEMPORARILY AND INFORMALLY DELISTED WASTES, REGULATORY STATUS
TEMPORARY AND INFORMAL DELISTINGS AND HSWA EFFECTS ON BOTH
TEMPORARY EXCLUSION APPLIED TO ONLY ONE FACILITY (MONROE AUTO)
VHS Model
DELISTING ISSUES RELATING TO EPA'S MOBILE INCINERATOR
DELISTING PETITION, USE OF VHS MODEL
DELISTING PETITIONS FOR K-WASTES MANAGED IN ON-SITE LAND-BASED UNITS-MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
DELISTING REGULATORY STANDARDS FOR FREON
DENIAL OF DELISTING PETITION BASED ON EXISTING GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
DETECTION LIMIT REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION ON APPENDIX VIII COMPOUNDS FOR A DELISTING PETITION
F006 WASTES, -VHS AND GROUNDWATER MONITORING DATA TO EVALUATE A DELISTING PETITION FOR
K103/K104 WASTE STREAMS - RELATIONSHIP OF CWA BAT, LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS, BOAT, AND DELISTING CRITERIA
RECONSIDERATION OF DELISTING DENIAL BASED ON USE OF VHS, TOTAL CHROMIUM STANDARD, AND MCL
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT DELISTING PETITIONS, USE OF VHS MODEL
DENIAL
(See Permit Process under Permit Denial)
DENTAL AMALGAM
(See Scrap Metal)
DEPARTMENT OF.DEFENSE (DOD)
(See Federal Facilities)
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE)
(See Federal Facilities) (See also Mixed Waste)
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (DOT)
(See Generators, Transporters)
9441.1987(65)
9441.1987(06)
9444.1989(11)
9541.1986(04)
9433.1990(02)
9433.1991(02)
9433.1984 (03)
9431.1991(01)
9433.1986(14)
9444.1987(28)
9433.1986(12)
9433.1986(09)
9541.1986(05)
9441.1987(57)
9433.1986(17)
9433.1986(06)
9433.1987(23)
9433.1986(05)
9433.1986(14)
9441.1987(30)
9433.1986(20)
9433.1985(05)
9433.1987(21)
9433.1987(20)
9433.1987(05)
9433.1986(19)
9433.1987(09)
9433.1987(06)
9433.1986(08)
9433.1987(25)
08/17/87
01/27/87
10/03/89
03/03/86
05/31/90
04/26/91
10/23/8-1
03/26/91
05/27/86
07/13/87
04/30/86
04/16/86
10/31/86
07/31/87
09/30/86
03/10/86
10/05/87
02/24/86
05/27/86
04/30/87
12/11/86
11/27/85
09/28/87
09/03/87
03/19/87
12/09/86
06/08/87
04/02/87
03/24/86
10/26/87
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
-------
1 I}"
i;
j ;
:t:;: 5 3:,, J Sfi
07/^2/96
DKRIVBD-FROH KIM
(See alao ._ „ . . ..
1 »I>0«ESTIC SEHftOE EXCLUSIOHl!* SB: *!fl!:!!:: *!• !' *: • ' :; !3 ; • :l: !' -v11'; :: riLi:'1 S Ii:1
'RBCUVIHED SPENT WOOD PRESERVATIVE EXCIAJSTON IN 261.4 (alOr"
*SPRNT SOIiVEHTS FROM VARNISH STRIPPING ' ~s -V.i- i -. ~~. 3 j ir! 1 !%' « :i: iMai'C^ i I. =. M , ;" »':"
APPI/ICADILITV OF F006 HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE TO NICKEli RECLAMATION PROCESS FOR ELECTRODESS NICKEL PIATIKG^SPbNT'SOLUTIONS
BEVILL AMENDMENT APPLIED TO COAL GASIFICATION FACILITY , ,
CLARIFICATION ON THE APPLICABILITY OF RCRA TO A FOUNDRY MANUFACTURING DUCT SYSTEM
COAL TAR DECANTER SLUDGE WASTE PILE (TOLEDO COKE)
CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER, RCRA REGULATORY STATUS
DERIVED FROM/MIXTURE RULE APPLICATION TO REFINERY WASTEHATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS :
: DRAINAGE WATER BENEATH LAND TREATMENT UNITS - NO MIGRATION PETITIONS -
i ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE DUST AFTER ENCAPSULATION TREATMENT PROCESS
HAZARDOUS WASTE LISTING DETERMINATION (60 FR 7825, FEBRUARY 9, 1995) OF K156 WASTE FROM THE PRODUCTION OF METHYL CARBAMATE
MIXING LOW AND HIGH BTU WASTES - SHAM BURNING, BLENDING, MANIFESTING
PAINT WASTES AND THE SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS
PETROLEUM REFINERY WW, MIXTURE AND DERIVED-FROM RULES
PLASTIC PACKING MEDIA FROM AIR STRIPPING TOWER TREATING CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER
REFRACTORY WASTES AT U.S. EPA COMBUSTION RESEARCH FACILITY
RESIDUAL WATER DERIVED FROM AN EXEMPT WASTE (COAL ASH) IS EXEMPT
1 SAMPLING LOCATION IN A SEPARATOR - THICKENER TREATMENT TRAIN AND THE MIXTURE RULE
SPENT ION EXCHANGE RESINS AND FILTER AS HAZARDOUS WASTE
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR FINAL RULE REGARDING SCOPE OF THE K062 LISTING, CORRECTION NOl'ICE
SPENT PIPELINE FILTER CARTRIDGES
SUPERNATANT FORMED IN LIME STABILIZATION OF WASTE PICKLE LIQUOR AS HAZARDOUS WASTE
SUPERNATANT FROM TREATMENT OF SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR (K062)
WASTE GENERATED BY AN INCINERATOR TRIAL BURN OF SAND SPIKED WITH TRICHLOROBENZENE AND HEXACHLOROETHANE
WASTE STREAMS GENERATED BY TREATMENT PROCESSES
Residue
CHARACTERIZATION OF WASTE STREAMS FROM POLYMERIC COATING OPERATIONS
HAZARDOUS WASTE RECYCLING REGULATIONS TO A PROPOSED INK RECYCLING PROCESS
INTERPRETATION OF THE MIXTURE RULE EXEMPTION AS IT RELATES TO SCRUBBER WATER FROM THE INCINERATION OF CERTAIN SOLVENTS
PERCHLOROETHYLENE AND SURFACTANT, DISTILLATION OF RESIDUE CONTAINING
RESIDUES FROM SECONDARY LEAD SMELTERS THAT RECYCLE K069 WASTES
SCRUBBER BRINE/SLUDGE PRODUCED IN INCINERATION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE
DESTRUCTION REMOVAL EFFICIENCY (ORE)
(See Incineration) " "
DETECTION LIMITS
(See Analytic Methods)
DETECTION MONITORING
(See Groundwater Monitoring)
DIBUTYLIN DIFLUORIDE
(See Hazardous Waste Identification)
DILUTION
.^^
^Characteristic Hazardous Waste) (See also Land Disposal Restrict!'
9441.1991(19)
;» 5j3i944li.l,9B6;(57j)fc
" J;"!9444\19!94(08)^
"9441.19,87(76)—
9441.1995(33)
:- 9441,1987(98)
" '94421. 19B4 (01) ;
9441.1987(70)'-
9551:. 1988 (is)
9444.1986(33)
944U 19,95 (34):.
*'""• - 9442J. 1987(04)™
9444.1987(17)
9441°. 1985 (29)-
, 9441.1989!(17)-
=9444. 1988 (05)
" :9441.1986(49)
':•-, 9433.1986(11),:
'9444. 1987 (131"-
- 9444.1986(31)
9444.1988:(03)
-""" 9441.1987(83)
= •9444=. 1987(47)-"
'9441.1988(04)
0 :"944i;.1992,(41) ;
07/30/87 i "r
12/01/91
05/30/86 2S
09/21/94 ~=
09/15/87 -:'.-:
10/19/95
12/24/87
12/26/84
08/28/87 7-
01/21/88 _-."
12/29/86 "
11/27/95 '
08/31/87
05/20/87
08/23/85
04/14/89
03/11/88
06/16/86
04/24/86
05/05/87
12/11/86
02/11/88
10/23/87
10/23/87
01/14/88
11/30/92
: 9442.1995(01) ;
::19441,. 1993:(14hi
"9441,. 1994 (16)1
9496,1991(01)
9441.1984(05):
01/26/95
09/01/93
06/10/94
04/10/85
08/05/91
02/19/84
XREF
XREF
XREF'
XREF1 :
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 29
DIOXIN
(See also Listed Hazardous Waste, Land Disposal Restrictions, RCRA/CERLA Interface)
•LABORATORY TESTING FOR DIOXIN
*LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTION, DIOXINS, AND 90-DAY ACCUMULATION
*LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - SOLVENT AND DIOXIN WASTES
•VARIANCES TO BAN - EFFECTIVE DATES FOR SOLVENTS AND DIOXINS
ASSURING PROTECTIVE OPERATION OF INCINERATORS BURNING DIOXIN-LISTED WASTES
CHLORINATED DIOXIN WASTES (F023)
CLARIFICATION ON WHAT CONSTITUTES DIOXIN RELATED MATERIALS
CLOSURE PLAN FOR THE HAZARDOUS WASTE STORAGE UNITS AT VERTAC'S SHUTDOWN MANUFACTURING PLANT
DELISTING ISSUES RELATING TO EPA'S MOBILE INCINERATOR
DESTRUCTION OF DIOXIN CONTAMINATED SOIL USING MOBILE INCINERATION
DIOXIN IN WASTES FROM WOOD PRESERVING PROCESSES USING PENTACHLOROPHENOL
DIOXIN STANDARD USED TO TEST GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY COLUMNS, HANDLING OF
DIOXIN TRIAL BURNS FOR PURPOSES OF CERTIFICATION OR A RCRA PERMIT
DIOXIN-CONTAINING LABORATORY WASTE WITH RADIOACTIVE PROPERTIES
DIOXIN-CONTAINING WASTE RINSEATES, DISPOSAL BY DEEP WELL INJECTION
EXCLUSION FROM RCRA PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS FOR LESS THAN 90-DAY ACCUMULATORS OF DIOXIN CONTAINING WASTES
F021 LISTING FOR SUBSTANCES CONTAINING CHLOROPHENOLIC COMPOUNDS
F027 LISTING - USED AND UNUSED FORMULATIONS IN WOOD PRESERVING
FEDERAL POLICY REGARDING DIOXIN DISPOSAL
IMPACT OF DRAFT HAZARDOUS WASTE MINIMIZATION AND COMBUSTION STRATEGY ON OHIO'S REGIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF AIR REGULATIONS
INCINERATOR PERMITS TO BURN DIOXIN WASTES, MODIFICATION OF
LABORATORY CARCASSES CONTAINING TCDD
LABORATORY SAMPLE EXCLUSION APPLICABILITY TO SAMPLES AND WASTES FROM LABORATORY ANALYSIS - DIOXIN
LABORATORY WASTE GENERATED IN RESEARCH USING TCDD STOCK SOLUTIONS
LABORATORY WASTES (INCLUDING CARCASSES, BEDDING, CAGES) CONTAINING DIOXIN
LUBRICATING OIL CONTAMINATED WITH TCDD THROUGH USE AS AN ANALYTICAL STANDARD
MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTION RESIDUES-ASH AND SLUDGE
RCRA METHODS AND QA ACTIVITIES (NOTES)
REFRACTORY WASTES AT U.S. EPA COMBUSTION RESEARCH FACILITY
SOIL CONTAMINATED WITH PESTICIDE
SOIL CONTAMINATED WITH USED AND UNUSED PESTICIDES
SOILS FROM MISSOURI DIOXIN SITES, WHETHER HAZARDOUS
SPENT CARBON USED TO REMOVE DISSOLVED PENTACHLOROPHENOL (PCP) FROM GROUNDWATER
TCLP IN THE LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS PROGRAM AND HAZARDOUS WASTE IDENTIFICATION PROGRAM
UNRINSED CONTAINERS WHICH FORMERLY CONTAINED AN UNUSED FORMULATION OF PENTACHLOROPHENOL
WASTES COVERED UNDER THE DIOXIN LISTING
WASTES FROM ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY
WASTEWATERS EXCLUSION FROM THE DEFINITION OF F021 FOR PCP MANUFACTURE
WOOD PRESERVING AND SURFACE PROTECTION FACILITIES, CONTROLLING ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES FROM
DISCARDED MATERIALS
(See Solid Waste) (See also Land Disposal Restrictions, RCRA/CERCLA Interface)
DISCHARGE
(See Wastewater) (See also Spills)
DISPOSAL
(See also Land Disposal Facilities, Land Disposal Restrictions, Recycle, TSDFs)
•MANUFACTURING PROCESS UNITS
•TANK CLOSURE IN 1977 - RCRA APPLICABILITY TO
XREF
9441.1985(11)
9551.1987(04)
9553.1988(01)
9551.1986(22)
9488.1992(01)
9444.1985(16)
9444.1992(09)
9488.1987(01)
9433.1986(20)
9433.1986(10)
9444.1985(02)
9441.1985(07)
9488.00-1A
9441.1985(26)
9444.1985(14)
9453.1985(02)
9444.1987(42)
9444.1987(10)
9444.1987(26)
9573.1994(01)
9488.1985(04)
9441.1987(36)
9441.1987(29)
9444.1986(16)
9444.1986(30)
9444.1987(48)
9443.1986(13)
9445.1985(04)
9444.1988(05)
9441.1987(21)
9444.1987(12)
9441.1984(01)
9444.1986(05)
9443.1987(29)
9444.1986(03)
9444.1986(23)
9444.1987(34)
9444.1987(39)
9441.1986(28)
/ /
03/30/85
01/30/87
02/28/88
12/30/86
09/22/92
09/26/85
12/24/92
02/09/87
12/11/86
04/24/86
03/04/85
02/13/85
05/07/86
07/05/85
09/10/85
03/12/85
09/23/87
04/09/87
07/02/87
01/10/94
05/30/85
05/14/87
04/30/87
08/18/86
12/10/86
10/23/87
05/27/86
06/30/85
03/11/88
04/08/87
04/18/87
01/06/84
03/03/86
11/18/87
02/12/86
10/21/86
08/07/87
09/02/87
04/07/86
XREF
XREF
XREF
9441.1987(71)
9480.1987(01)
08/30/87
05/30/87
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD I»EX
Page Ko. 30
•OSB;CONSTITUTING,DISPOSAL, RES1DOES, FROM FIRE TRAINING EXERCISES
ACCUMULATION OF SECONDARY MATERIAL - ABANDONED VS. DISPOSED OF
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA USED OIL REGULATIONS TO USED O^L CONTAINED IN DISCARDED HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES
:';BUBBLER CANISTERS CONTAINING PHOSPHOROUS OXYCHLORIDE! ARE NOT HASTE HHBN RETURNED TO THB;WUTBD STATES.JFROMI JAPAN- FOR .REGENERATION i
CLARIFICATION OF CERTAIN ASPECTS OF 40 CFR 268 DEBRIS REGULATIONS
-• CLEAN CLOSURE AND DISPOSAL OF AN INCINERATOR . -, : = '
r 'CONTAINERS FOR SAFE AND ECONOMICAL STORAGE, TRANSPORT, AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE, DEVELOPMENT OF ! : • >
.CREOSOTE TREATED CROSS TIES, DISPOSAL OF, FIFRA INTERFACE
DECHARACTERIZATION AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTES THAT HAVE UNDERGONE CHEMICAL SOLIDIFICATION
DRY TOLUENE AND CARBON TETRACHLORIDE, SAFE DISPOSAL OF
EXCLUSION FROM REGULATION FOR CHARACTERISTIC AND LISTED WASTES - LEACHATE LEVELS
FORMALDEHYDE-BASED TOILET DEODORANTS
HOLDING, TEMPORARY, PERIOD, STORAGE, AND DISPOSAL (DEFINITIONS)
:JOINT NRC-EPA GUIDANCE ON AN APPROACH FOR COMMERCIAL MIXED LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE AND HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES ;
K006 HASTES AND ON-SITE DISPOSAL UNIT CONTAINING THESE HASTES
LEAKS, SPILLS, AND ILLEGAL DISCHARGES OF LISTED HASTES TO SURFACE HATERS, MIXTURE RULE APPLIED TO
MARINE DEBRIS IN HATERS, DISPOSAL OF
OPEN BURNING/OPEN DETONATION AT DOD FACILITIES
"PERFORMANCE AND PERMITTING STANDARDS IN 3004 (b), PROHIBITION OF PLACEMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN SALT DOMES
PROPER DISPOSAL OF OLD MEDICATIONS
REGULATIONS FOR DISPOSAL OF CERAMIC MATERIALS
RESIDUALS GENERATED BY PROCESS FOR SEHAGE SLUDGE TREATMENT
'RESIDUES FROM .MUNICIPAL HASTE RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITIES
SEDIMENT SAMPLE DISPOSAL
SPECIAL MATERIALS DISPOSED OF IN LANDFILLS: BATTERIES, CAPACITORS, LAB PACKS
TRANSPORTATION AND DISPOSAL OF SHOCK SENSITIVE OR EXPLOSIVE MATERIALS
USED OIL, BURNING OF OFF-SPECIFICATION FUEL - DUMPING
DO-IT-YOURSELFERS (DIYERS)
(See Used Oil)
DOD
(See Department of Defense, Federal Facilities) , =
DOE
(See Department of Energy, Federal Facilities) (See also Mixed Waste)
DOT • - - .. - .:
(See Department of Transportation, Generators) (See also Transporters)
DOUBLE LINER
(See Minimum Technological Requirements)
DRE
(See Incineration under Destruction Removal Efficiency)
DREDGED SEDIMENTS
(See Hazardous Waste Identification)
94;93j3,98S,(04:) :
944li98S(2S)
9592«J994;{Q6)i
; 9456i.il S94l(iOii);;;
" 955l'.'l994 (01)""
:9488W1987!C04j;r
9441.1985:128)
9493vl985(05)
9451,1986(06)
,9441:.il986;(03)%
9441.11986(38)
9432.;1986(12L
'9487L;00-8 '~:
9444,1987(37)=
944li.:1986(07)i
9432.1987(123)
9S02a98&(16)>
9489.1985(01)
9574.1990(01)
9441.1992(22^
;9442jl98a(01) .
9487!.1986(08)
9441.1989(12)
9487.1986(13)
9527.1992(01)
9441.1986(40)
11/30/85
07/01/85
07/11/94
12/16/94
10/06/94
06/12/87
11/26/85
07/16/85
12/13/85
12/15/86
01/07/86
05/01/86
07/28/86
08/03/87
08/19/87
01/23/86
11/04/87
09/22/86
09/20/85
11/28/90
07/21/92
02/10/88
05/27/86
03/31/89
12/31/86
11/03/92
07/31/86
XREF
:.XREF :
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF l-
I
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 31
DRILLING FLUIDS
(See Enerqy Exploration Wastes)
DRINKING WATER
*GROUNDWATER MONITORING FOR RADIONUCLIDES n™™»,
*REINJECTED GROUNDWATER RESULTING FROM CORRECTIVE ACTION TREATMENT
EP TOXICITY LEVEL FOR BARIUM IN DRINKING WATER
HEALTH-BASED LEVEL FOR CYANIDE
XREF
INFILTRATION GALLERIES BY THE OCWDW AND OSW
UNDERGROUND INJECTION WELLS USED IN HYDROCARBON RECOVERY
DRIP PADS
*WOOD PRESERVING WASTES - ADMINISTRATIVE STAY
DRIPPAGE IN WOOD PRESERVING STORAGE YARDS
DRUM SHREDDING UNIT
(See Treatment)
DUST
BERYLLIUM WASTE DUST
CEMENT KILN DUST WASTE
RECYCLING OF ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE DUST
STAINLESS STEEL PRODUCTION RESIDUES
DUST SUPPRESSION
(See also HSWA, Disposal, Used Oil)
*USED OIL AS DUST SUPPRESSANT
*USED OIL USED FOR DUST SUPPRESSION OR ROAD TREATMENT
HSWA PROHIBITIONAONR°HE UsToF HAZARDOUS WASTE AS A DUST SUPPRESSANT
TWO WASTE OIL MANAGEMENT PRACTICES REGULATORY STATUS
ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE
(See Hazardous Waste Identification, Incineration)
ELECTROPLATING
(See also Listed Hazardous Waste, Solvents)
"ELECTROPLATING AND ELECTROLESS PLATING LISTINGS
*F006 SLUDGE FROM ACID WASTE MIXTURE
*F009 LISTING FOR ELECTROPLATING AFTER CYANIDE BATH
*WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE FROM CHEMICAL ETCHING
*WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS
=N^O^^^ «
DRAFT SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN FOR NH PLATING COMPANY
XREF
9481.1987(06)
9554.1991(03)
9443.1989(03)
9442.1988(02)
9444.1990(05)
9521.1991(01)
9521.1991(02)
XREF
9489.1991(03)
9489.1991(02)
/ /
06/30/87
04/01/91
04/20/89
03/30/88
10/17/90
08/27/91
08/30/91
, /
06/01/91
05/31/91
XREF
XREF
9434.1989(01)
9441.1988(36)
9441.1988(27)
9441.1988(07)
XREF
9493.1985(06)
9441.1990(09b)
9493.1985(01)
9493.00-1A
9495.1991(01)
03/17/89
07/29/88
06/15/88
-03/10/88
12/30/85
03/31/90
07/12/85
05/31/86
06/05/91
XREF
XREF
9432.
9441.
9444.
9444.
9453.
9441.
9441
9433
1989(01)
1987(11)
.1989(06)
.1984(02)
.1984(02)
.1990(11)
.1995(24)
.1990(06)
08/30/89
02/28/87
07/30/89
03/30/84
05/30/84
04/12/90
06/30/95
11/27/90
-------
:iii := :-l.i!i(
HE
jsj,; ^[j:;i=
™
bias
"«i !ii
07/02/96
ELECTROCHEMICAL MACHINING: HASTES AMD THE! SCOPE OF THE FOflS LISTING
?BtECTRQPLATIHG RIHSEHATERS
ELECTROPLATING RINSEHATERS-NOT IN F007-009 LISTINGS
jiaBLECTROPLATING, SLUDGE, EXCLUSION PETITION ?, : :
"ELECTROPLATING HASTES ' " "
i^FOOS AND F019 BLECTROPLATINC LISTINGS
i JfFOOS LISTING AND DEFINITION OF CONVERSION COATING *' ! =
F006 LISTING APPLIED TO PRINTING INDUSTRY .
-F006 LISTING FOR PICKLING AND ETCHING WASTES AND DELISTING ISSUES
., .-..F009 LISTING AND THE MIXTURE RULE TO ELECTROPLATING RINSEWATERS AND RESINS
, ,F019 LISTING AND THE CONVERSION COATING PROCESS :
.IMMERSION PLATING WASTEHATERS-BRONZE PLATING
IJ^ND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS ON THE METAL FINISHING INDUSTRY
^(MECHANICAL PLATING WASTES IN THE F006 LISTING, NON-INCLUSION OF
-RECYCLING NICKEL, COPPER AND CHROMIUM-CONTAINING ELECTROPLATING SLUDGES
5jRECYCLING OF ELECTROPLATING SLUDGES (F006) FOR CEMENT/AGGREGATE MANUFACTURE
, —PR^S GENERATED ™
REINTERPRETATION OF THE F006 LISTING
SLUDGES GENERATED FROM THE FIRST CLEANING STAGES OF PHOSPHATING PROCESS
SPENT CYANIDE PLATING BATH SOLUTIONS FROM SILVER RECOVERY "
SPENT ION EXCHANGE RESIN
>PENT ION EXCHANGE RESINS AND FILTER AS HAZARDOUS WASTE
WASTE FROM CHEMICAL ETCHING USING CYANIDE
" WASTE TREATMENT FACILITIES ACCEPTING F006 ELECTROPLATING WASTES
^ WASTES FROM BRIGHT DIPPING UNDER THE REINTERPRETED F006 LISTING
;. WASTES FROM ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) ON CARBON STEEL EXCLUDED FROM F006
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS
,WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES RESULTING FROM METAL CLEANING PROCESS
.iSZINC PLATING, WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES GENERATED FROM- -* - '
Pickle Liquor
CORRECTED LISTING DESCRIPTION -FOR K062 -
' EXCLUSIONS FOR K-WASTES DENIED (LACLEDE STEEL)
; K062 - SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR LISTING _
• K062 LISTING APPLIES ONLY TO FACILITIES WITHIN THE IRON AND STEEL INDUSTRY ~ -
, LIME STABILIZED WASTE PICKLE LIQUOR SLUDGE EXCLUSION : '
LIME-STABILIZED WASTE PICKLE LIQUOR SLUDGE EXEMPTION FOR LIME-AMMONIA STABILIZED IRON OXIDE SLUDGE
"D THE LIHE sraBIL1ZED BASTE PICKLE LIQUOR SLODGE EXEMPTION
.PRINTED IRCUIT ;BOARD MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY
PICKLE LIQUOR RECOVERY UNIT AS AN INDUSTRIAL FURNACE . -. - . ..
SIC CODE FOR A STEEL MANUFACTURER/PROCESSOR, PICKLE LIQUOR SLUDGE - POINT OF WASTE GENERATION
SPENT ACID FROM ELECTROPOLISHING OF STAINLESS STEEL
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR CORROSIVITY
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR DELISTING PETITION
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR FINAL RULE REGARDING SCOPE OF THE K062 LISTING, CORRECTION NOTICE
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR GENERATED FROM PORCELAIN ENAMEL INDUSTRY, DELISTING OF
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR SLUDGE, LIME-STABILIZED, IN IRON AND STEEL AND PORCELAIN ENAMELING INDUSTRIES
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR USED IN PRODUCTION OF FERRIC CHLORIDE
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR USED/REUSED IS NOT SOLID WASTE
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR, DEFINITION AS HAZARDOUS
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR, REUSE OF
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR, STATUS OF SUPERNATANT FROM LIME NEUTRALIZATION OF
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR, USE/REUSE EXEMPTION AS APPLIED TO
SPENT SULFURIC ACID PICKLE LIQUOR USED TO PRODUCE FERTILIZER
SUPERNATANT FORMED IN LIME STABILIZATION OF WASTE PICKLE LIQUOR AS HAZARDOUS WASTE
""^ "NATANT FROM TREATMENT OF SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR (K062) ~
SJMttIA
M/M. 1387 (03)
9442.1987(03)
9444.1988(07)
9433.1984(05) :
9441.1991(06)
9444.1986(09) i
9444.1987(09)
. ~" 9444.1987(19)
9444.1387(55)
:9444.1987(31)
9444.1987(22)
9442.1988(05)
9554,1987(02)
:9444.1986(13)
' ^9441.1988(09)
"9441.1989 (19)
,, 9443.1994(04) .
9444.1986(21)
9444.1986(19)
9444.1986(11) ,
9441.1989(34)
j i/'9444.1985(ll)
9444.1987(13)
"•• 9444.1987(16)
:;;;9554.1988(05)
9444.1987(28)
9444.1987(14)
9444.1985(13)
^>444. 1989(08) -
J 9441.1984(29)
s-= "-. -,
9444.1987(313)
9441.1989(48) --
s-: ^-9444.1984(11) \
; ^9444. 1987 (08)
"9441.1987(74)
9441.1987(54) '.
9441.1987(08) '-
V:v 9444. 1985 (17) ;
r: 9432. 1987 (13) *
': , 9441.1985(18) :-
9444.1984(12)
-9443.1988(05)
9433.1991(02)
9444.1986(31) ;
- 9433.1984(03) :
9441.1984(31)
9441.1985(27) \
9441.1986(61)
9441.1987(39)
9441.1987(17)
-''---. S9441.1984(12) '.
9441.1985(20) '.
^^9493.1985(02) i
9441.1987(83.^"
~ 9444.1987(^^^
01/27/87
07/28/87
04/07/88,
12/11/B4;:
05/29/91
05/02/861;
03/26/87
05/22/87
12/28/87
07/28/87
06/24/87
10/03/88
02/03/87
06/24/86
04/06/88
04/26/89
07/12/94
10/04/86
09/25/86
05/22/86
07/06/89
06/19/85
05/05/87
05/20/87
08/11/88:
07/13/87
05/08/87
09/03/85
08/21/89
09/24/84
07/30/87
09/12/89
07/27/84
03/16/87
09/02/87
07/13/87
01/28/87
10/03/85
11/10/87
05/21/85
07/30/84
05/02/88
04/26/91
12/11/86 i
10/23/84 !
10/25/84
07/16/85
08/18/86
05/20/87
03/31/87 :
06/04/84
06/05/85
11/14/85 i
10/23/87
10/23/87
I
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 33
WASTE LISTINGS F006 AND K062, SCOPE OF
ZlnCCLlssiF?CATION OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE FROM THE REVISED "ZINC-COBALT ALLOY PLATING ON CARBON STEEL" PROCESS
DELISTING OF WASTE GENERATED FROM ZINC PHOSPHATING ON CARBON STEEL
ELECTROLESS ZINC PLATING WASTE NOT IN F006 LISTING
ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) ON CARBON STEEL
ZINC PLATING, WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES GENERATED FROM
ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION UNITS
(See Exclusions)
EMERGENCY PERMIT
EMERGENCY PERMITS FOR DETONATION OF EXPLOSIVE WASTE ntroTM~ BMO,VCTC
EXPLOSIVES PRESENTING AN IMMEDIATE SAFETY THREAT AND EXPLOSIVES STORED DURING ANALYSIS
TANKS USED FOR EMERGENCY CONTAINMENT
TEMPORARY TANK SYSTEMS USED IN RESPONSE TO EMERGENCIES, REQUIREMENTS FOR
TRANSPORTATION AND DISPOSAL OF SHOCK SENSITIVE OR EXPLOSIVE MATERIALS
EMISSION CONTROIi WASTES
(See Sludge)
EMPTY
(See Containers, Tank System)
ENERGY EXPLORATION WASTES
(See also Mining Waste)
*DRIP GAS EXCLUSION
*OIL AND GAS EXCLUSION APPLICABILITY
MINING WASTE EXCLUSION INCLUDING PRIMARY PROCESSING BUT NOT SUBSEQUENT STEPS
OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION EXCLUSION
TC RULE - IMPLEMENTATION
Drilling Fluids
DRILLING OPERATIONS, EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN WASTE FROM
ENFORCEMENT
ENFORCEMENT°OF1APPLICABLE RCRA REGULATIONS AT FACILITIES WITH PENDING DELISTING PETITIONS
ENFORCEMENT OF APPLICABLE RCRA REGULATIONS AT FACILITIES WITH PENDING DELISTING REGULATIONS
EPA ENFORCEMENT OF RCRA-AUTHORIZED STATE HAZARDOUS WASTE LAWS AND REGULATIONS
GWM DEFICIENCIES IN PART B's, RESPONSES TO AND MECHANISMS TO PREVENT
INADEQUATE PART B PERMIT APPLICATION „,„,„„
PENALTIES FOR FAILURE TO SUBMIT A COMPLETE AND ADEQUATE PART B APPLICATION
PERMIT COMPLIANCE/ENFORCEMENT ISSUES (REG. X)
RCRA FACILITY ASSESSMENTS, IMPLEMENTATION
ROLE OF AUTHORIZED STATES IN DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Administrative Order
•ENFORCEMENT USING 3008(h) AUTHORITY AND 3013 ORDERS
9444.1986(32) 12/12/86
9441.1994(20)
9441.1984(24)
9444.1987(23)
9444.1984(09)
9441.1984(29)
XREF
XREF
9527.1986(01)
9527.1988(03)
9471.1984(03)
9483.1987(04)
9527.1992(01)
XREF
XREF
XREF
9441.1989(05)
9441.1988(42)
9441.1986(81)
9441.1987(04)
9441.1990(29)
08/02/94
09/06/84
06/30/87
06/13/84
09/24/84
01/05/86
08/11/88
09/06/84
04/20/87
11/03/92
02/28/89
09/30/88
11/03/86
01/13/87
10/01/90
9441.1980(03) 09/04/80
XREF
9433.1987(14)
9504.1987(01)
9541.1982(01)
9504.1984 (02)
9521.1984 (01)
9523.1984(10)
9522.00-3
9502.00-4
9541.1987(01)
/ /
07/20/87
07/20/87
05/17/82
11/29/84
05/02/84
12/18/84
11/13/87
08/21/86
01/14/87
9502.1986(18) 09/30/86
-------
I
:'?_ -". _v-: L- i^riii^*:^ : ^ i-f-ij*: ;-::-: ':: i'i1 ' : - S^Svh^P^ V4 -- ^ii:
H • :: • ;•» t •_' t:
(i i .- * it != 5: 5!
.^. --*-- . *L™ --. a>j;
i i : r ^ = = =fi -=|i - ' 5^
^BYWORD
ORDERS ( "» !-• ' -; -- - *•: " . ; ,>-"..-:"-
J-3008(h) ORDERS OR POST-CLOSURE PERMITS AT CLOSING TACILrTJES^USB OF 7 =~^_I "- "L"
.^CONCURRENCE ON THE USE OF SECTION 7003 TO (COMPEL TIIB O,EAN-U!pSoF AN OIL: SMLtiS^ •-; i
ISCORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES < 8 "
^CORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES, NATIONAL PRIORITIES 1 ,
UIDANCE ON HOW TO COORDINATE PERMIT 3004(0) AND ORDER 3006 (H)j REQUIREMENTS
Enforcement Action ' : •: " r
3008 (h) ORDERS OR POST-CLOSURE PERMITS AT CLOSING FACILITIES, USE OF ' " -
CONCURRENCE ON THE USE OF SECTION 7003 TO COMPEL THE CLEAN-UP OP AN OIL SPILL - --.'...
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS : " ""-: "'
ENFORCEMENT ACTION ^ ; . -^ : a ;: ; J ..,!;.",' = ;: ™
(See Enforcement) i ~ ": ' " :
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS
APPLICABILITY OF NEPA'S ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT TO EPA'S ACTIONS UNDER RCRA ; " '
EP TOXICITY " r -; ' ;' , :
(See Characteristic Hazardous Waste) •
EPA I.D. NUMBER
(See also Generators, Transporters, TSDF, Notification) =
•MANIFESTING REQUIREMENTS AND EPA I.D. NUMBERS ; : ;- : '; "•
•MANIFESTING REQUIREMENTS AND EPA IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS ! ' "
•TRANSFER FACILITY AS CENTRAL COLLECTION POINT ,' > , ' :- *'!: :': "
DO VESSELS TRANSPORTING A RCRA REGULATED HAZARDOUS WASTE REQUIRE AN EPA ID NUMBFR FOR TRANSPORT BETWEEN THE U S-• AND -BELGIUM? "
GENERATOR I.D. NUMBERS TO COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES, ASSIGNING ! J»i*.iunr-;
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE ON ISSUANCE OF PROVISIONAL EPA I.D NUMBERS
RESIDUES GENERATED FROM THE TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE, I.D. NUMBERS FOR ! S M i ; "
USING A GENERATOR IDENTIFICATION NUMBER AND/OR MANIFEST TO DETERMINE LIABILITY i '' '- ' ~J
Identification ->-.;:>
•DOT MANIFEST REQUIREMENTS .", . "
Identification Numbers • " : !
•IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS FOR TWO COMPANIES ON SAME SITE ! ~-
•MANIFEST REQUIREMENTS FOR IMPORTED HAZARDOUS WASTE ' ; =
•SIGNING THE MANIFEST AS AN AGENT WHEN IMPORTING HAZARDOUS WASTE
EPA I.D. NUMBER AND FACILITY LOCATION
EPA'S CURRENT INTERPRETATION OF THE REQUIREMENTS IN 40 CFR SECTION 262.12 REGARDING EPA ID NUMBERS ' : ' :
IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS FOR RESIDUES GENERATED FROM THE TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE ; !-
RAPID ISSUANCE OF IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS TO SITES UNDER INVESTIGATION BY DBA
EQUIVALENCY . ; : ;
(See Test Methods)
EXCLUSIONS
(S
Agricultural Waste, Hazardous Waste Identification, Recycle.
SECTION 261.4(c): HAZARDOUS WASTES WHICH ARE EXEMPTED FROM CERT.
Waste, Wastewater)
ILATIONS
-- .f T^-~--« r
El
-=- ^^i=-
»M ,=iT .
— -f^azrV^ ' = —
_ V _;_ .h ,.
gssSiisss^osi
9502,00-7r r
9504 ill 99Mt01 )rt
9502*00-2;
9S02,1986;t04):
9502.00-7
9504,199i:(01)
9523.;00-12 ;
XREF *
XREF
9522.1979(01)
XREF
XREF
9452.1989(01)
9452.1990(01)
9461.1991(01) t
9455.1995(01) :
9451.1983(02)
9463.1980(02) k
9441.1986(05) H
9451.1994(02) "
9461.1987(05) '?
9432.1988(02) '
9462.1995(01) ji
9462.1995(02)
9461.1989(03) •--
9451.1995(01) ;r
9442.1986(01) '
9451.1987(01) ,
'ages Mo.
08/30/86
03/08/88
11/07/91
04/18/86
02/13/86
08/10/89
03/08/88
11/07/91
03/30/87
'/
03/22/79
12/30/89
02/25/90
11/01/91
02/17/95
09/30/83
11/26/80
01/16/86
03/04/94
09/30/87
02/28/88
01/31/95
03/31/95
08/18/89
08/22/95
01/16/86
02/05/87
;XREF
XREF ^^^ / /
L9441.1990(1
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 35
*API SEPARATOR SLUDGE, EXCLUSION OF WATER FRACTION FROM K051 LISTING
•APPLICABILITY OF THE SECTION 261.4(a)(2) EXCLUSIONS
*BATTERY REGENERATION
*COKE AND COAL TAR RECYCLABLE MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS
*CONDITIONS FOR EXCLUSION OF PORTABLE TREATMENT UNITS
•HOTEL DRY CLEANING WASTE AND THE HOUSEHOLD WASTE EXCLUSIONS
•LAB EXCLUSION, APPLICATION OF
•LABORATORY TESTING FOR DIOXIN
•MEDICAL WASTE - HOUSEHOLD MEDICAL WASTE
•MINING WASTE EXCLUSION REINTERPRETATION
•MOBILE WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNITS
•POLLUTION CONTROL SLUDGE FROM TREATMENT OF MINING WASTE - EXCLUSION
•RECLAIMED SPENT WOOD PRESERVATIVE EXCLUSION IN 261.4(a)(9)
•REGULATORY STATUS OF WASTE FROM OIL GATHERING PIPELINES
•RESTAURANT WASTE AND THE HOUSEHOLD WASTE EXCLUSION
•SAMPLE EXCLUSION
•SECONDARY MATERIALS USED AS EFFECTIVE SUBSTITUTES FOR COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS
•WASTE CLASSIFICATION
•WASTES GENERATED IN PROCESS UNITS
•ZERO DISCHARGE AT FACILITIES AND SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, RCRA EXCLUSION, CWA APPLIES
AQUEOUS SOLUTION, IGNITABILITY DEFINED
CCA TREATED WOOD WHEN DISPOSED
CLARIFICATION OF RCRA REGULATORY APPLICATION TO SOILS CONTAMINATED BY CEMENT KILN DUST
CLASSIFICATION OF WASTE FLUIDS ASSOCIATED WITH CLEAN UP OF CRUDE OIL LEAKS IN ACTIVE OIL FIELDS
DEIONIZATION ACID
DISTILLATION OR FRACTIONATION COLUMN BOTTOMS FROM THE PRODUCTION OF CHLOROBENZENE
DOMESTIC SEWAGE SLUDGE EXCLUSION
DRILLING OPERATIONS, EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN WASTE FROM
DRY CLEANING AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES WASTE NOT EXCLUDED AS HOUSEHOLD WASTE
EMISSION CONTROL DUST/SLUDGE FROM ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE AT FOUNDRY NOT A K061 WASTE
ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS ASSOCIATED WITH BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE IN CEMENT KILNS
EXCLUSIONS FOR K-WASTES DENIED (LACLEDE STEEL)
EXCLUSIONS FOR PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS IN RCRA TSDF INSURANCE POLICIES, GUIDANCE ON
HOUSEHOLD WASTE EXCLUSION SCOPE
HOUSEHOLD WASTES - DISPOSAL OF CARBON-ZINC BATTERIES
INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT OF LAB SAMPLES
INTERPRETATION OF INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER DISCHARGE EXCLUSION FROM THE DEFINITION OF SOLID WASTE
K006 WASTES AND ON-SITE DISPOSAL UNIT CONTAINING THESE WASTES
K051 SLUDGE RE-USED ON-SITE, EXEMPTION
LABORATORY WASTE EXCLUSION
LAND DISPOSAL OF SOLVENTS
MINING WASTE REGULATED UNDER SUBTITLE D RATHER THAN SUBTITLE C
MIXING OF METHANOL AS NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE
MIXTURES OF SPENT SOLVENTS - F001-F005, REGULATORY STATUS OF
MODIFICATIONS TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM UNDER EXCLUSION
OIL AND GAS EXEMPTION IN 3001 (b) (2) (A) OF RCRA: IRON SPONGE PROCESS
PROCESS WASTE DELISTED BY THE STATE DESIGNATES THE WASTE NON-HAZARDOUS WITHIN THE STATE
PROPER DISPOSAL OF SILVER NITRATE AND CHLOROFORM AS LABORATORY CHEMICALS
RAW MATERIAL TRANSPORT VESSEL EXCLUSION FOR ALL WASTES GENERATED ON SUCH VESSELS
RCRA 3001 (f) (2) (b) AND STATES' EXCLUSION OF WASTES FROM REGULATION AS HAZARDOUS
RESIDUES FROM U.S. NAVY SALVAGE FUEL BOILER
RESPONSE TO REGION III IMPLEMENTATION AND OVERSIGHT ISSUES
SCOPE OF BEVILL AMENDMENT AS IT APPLIES TO PHOSPHATE MINING, PHOSPHORIC ACID PRODUCTION, AND ANCILLARY FACILITIES
SCRAP DEHP AND SMALL CAPACITORS CONTAINING DEHP, DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SIC CODE FOR A STEEL MANUFACTURER/PROCESSOR, PICKLE LIQUOR SLUDGE - POINT OF WASTE GENERATION
SLUDGE DEHYDRATION EQUIPMENT THAT IS PART OF A WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR SLUDGE, LIME-STABILIZED, IN IRON AND STEEL AND PORCELAIN ENAMELING INDUSTRIES
9441.1984(13)
9441.1987(84)
9441.1985(30a)
9441.1989(04)
9471.1984 (02)
9441.1995(13)
9441.1984 (22)
9441.1985(11)
9441.1989(24)
9441.1985(35)
9432.1987(05)
9441.1985(09)
9441.1991(19)
9441.1992(03)
9441.1995(19)
9441.1990(136)
9441.1992(13)
9441.1987(99)
9441.1986(96)
9441.1984(14)
9443.1985(02)
9441.1991(11)
9441.1993(11)
9441.1991(053)
9443.1986(11)
9441.1988(11)
9441.1990(02)
9441.1980(03)
9441.1986(32)
9441.1984 (08)
9441.1987(78)
9441.1989(48)
9477.00-6
9574.1991(01)
9441.1984(07)
9441.1989(20)
9441.1995(05)
9444.1987(37)
9494.1985(02)
9441.1985(03)
9453.1987(09)
9441.1986(55)
9471.1983(01)
9441.1984 (06)
9441.1991(01)
9441.1983(03)
9541.1986(04)
9441.1993(01)
9441.1986(65)
9541.1986(05)
9441.1987(16)
9541.1986(10)
9441.1992(10)
9441.1985(23)
9441.1985(18)
9522.1988(02)
9441.1984(31)
05/30/84
10/31/87
09/30/85
02/28/89
03/30/84
03/31/95
07/31/84
03/30/85
08/16/89
10/30/85
06/30/87
02/28/85
12/01/91
01/31/92
05/31/95
05/31/90
05/31/92
12/31/87
12/30/86
05/30/84
02/26/85
06/28/91
06/30/93
05/21/91
05/12/86
04/21/88
02/12/90
09/04/80
04/21/86
05/03/84
10/08/87
09/12/89
11/23/87
05/30/91
04/19/84
04/27/89
02/17/95
08/19/87
07/30/85
07/31/85
12/10/87
07/16/86
07/12/83
04/10/84
01/03/91
05/25/83
03/03/86
02/23/93
09/03/86
10/31/86
03/17/87
05/01/86
05/15/92
06/27/85
05/21/85
03/07/88
10/25/84
-------
:!:i!l
BE:
*; =i= , fl( A rf»^«^ r=fer%-=r i **; = i»ifsit-=3ii =
:si ; s m :,
i •-- ; =M * * » -;; ^ =s r °- * !^ ;= = = H = ^ = |- ^ -:T*= ii Kit?- e ?--
07/02/96
KEYWORD 1MKX
BB; SS i
;;:!;;; ;; in:
Page Ho. 36
-
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR, STATUS OF SUPERNATANT iFROM LIME HEUTRALftATION OF.i =: « " ; •: J
;: SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR, USB/REUSED EXEMPTION AS APPLIED TO - *.i sv * -- -_n" : - ., :.; i'
TEMPORARY EXCLUSION APPLIED TO»ONLY ONE FACILITY (MONHOE AUTO) s hi .'_&-,:-.• r -,e~- u :• - -.-:-- -•-
lijTRUCK OR RAIL SHIPMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TO A POTW 1 . i( n "Si i ^ ,», * « i
"WASTES GENERATED IN MANUFACTURING PROCESS UNIT NOT SUBJECT TO LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS'UNTIL REMOVED
j WASTEWATERS EXCLUSION FROM THE DEFINITION OF F021 FOR PCP MANUFACTURE ' « --- -
'^'ZIRCONIUM PHOSPHATING SLUDGES EXEMPTION ': B Hi: -^l1 , S !:: ! t
Chromium
*SW-846 TEST METHOD 3060 ; '
CHROMIUM WASTES, EXCLUSION FOR CERTAIN '. * ; .» ' j
CHROMIUM WASTES: TRIVALENT AND HEXAVALENT, CHROMIUM IN TANNERY WASTES ' : : r " :"
SPENT SULFURIC ACID PICKLE LIQUOR USED TO PRODUCE FERTILIZER :
TOTAL CHROMIUM ANALYSIS ,; ! . - - .- '-.' : :: - , i
Elementary Neutralization Units M > » s-; i • i
*ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION UNITS
*ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION UNITS GENERATING AND STORING NON-CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTES '
*STATUS OF WWTUs/ENUs AT GENERATOR SITES . ", ,
ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION EXEMPTION 7, ."' ;
HAZARDOUS WASTE TANK SYSTEM STANDARDS TO ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT AND EXEMPTED ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEMS
TANK TREATMENT PROCESSES , . .-
THE EFFECT OF AN UPCOMING RULE ON NONHAZARDOUS UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL WELLS AND ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION UNITS
WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION UNITS EXEMPTION
Exemption
'CLOSED-LOOP RECYCLING EXCLUSION
'ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION UNITS
'ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION UNITS GENERATING AND STORING NON-CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTES
'FUME INCINERATORS
'GENERATION AND RECYCLING
'HAZARDOUS WASTE EXPORT RULE FOR BATTERY RECLAMATION
'MULTIPLE GENERATOR LOCATION AND CONSOLIDATION ;
'NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR EXPORTED WASTES
'OIL AND GAS EXCLUSION APPLICABILITY !
'PARTS WASHING WITH MINERAL SPIRITS, SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS
'REGULATORY STATUS OF METALS RECOVERY UNDER RCRA
'REGULATORY STATUS OF NATURAL GAS CONDENSATE
'STATUS OF FOSSIL FUEL COMBUSTION WASTE EXCLUSION
'TRUCK TRANSPORT OF WASTEWATER FOR PURPOSES OF SECTION 261.3 (a) (2) (iv) (A) i
'WASTE DERIVED FROM TREATING EXEMPT OR EXCLUDED WASTES • . - - _
'WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT DEFINITION
'WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT/GENERATOR ACCUMULATION TANK
APPLICABILITY OF PART 279 USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS TO THE OPERATION OF A VEHICLE FLEET SERVICING OPERATION
APPLICABILITY OF THE HOUSEHOLD WASTE EXCLUSION TO LEAD-CONTAMINATED SOIL
APPLICATION OF THE SCRAP METAL EXEMPTION TO LEAD FOIL USED IN DENTAL X-RAY PACKAGES
CLARIFICATION AS TO WHETHER DEWATERING IS A PROCESS THAT TRIGGERS EPA'S USED OIL PROCESSOR REQUIREMENTS i J
CLARIFICATION OF CERTAIN ISSUES REGARDING OIL AND GAS WASTES "
CLARIFICATION OF HOW RCRA REGULATIONS APPLY TO OFF-SPECIFICATION FUELS THAT ARE BEING BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
CLARIFICATION REGARDING THE "REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION" PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THE RECYCLED USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS
CLARIFICATION REGARDING THE HAZARDOUS WASTE SAMPLE EXCLUSION FOUND IN 40 CFR 261.4 (d)
CLASSIFICATION OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE FROM THE REVISED "ZINC-COBALT ALLOY PLATING ON CARBON STEEL" PROCESS
CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS AT FACILITIES HAVING DELISTING EXCLUSIONS REVOKED
COAL/FOSSIL FUEL COMBUSTION WASTES EXCLUDED FROM SUBTITLE C PENDING FURTHER STUDY
CONDITIONALLY EXEMPT SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR PROVISIONS
DEFINITION OF INDUSTRIAL FURNACE AS IT APPLIES TO SMELTING, MELTING, AND REFINING FURNACES HANDLING SECONDARY MATERIALS !
REQUIREMENTS APPLY TO THE HANDLING, SHIPMENT AND DISPOSAL OF HOUgaMkD APPLIANCE COMPONENTS?
COTKD
|!(
• - »"
94 4:1 « W 84, 1 12}
9441. 19851(20'),
944:l,lJ987;(30)
944|l,lN6;(88)ii
944ll. 1987(53)
944!4, *987i(39):i
944!4.1990;(04)M
9443.1987420)
9441.1988(03)
9441.1986;(24)
9493.1985(02)
9443.1987-U1)
1 :
9471.1988(03)
9472.1994(01)
9432.1995 (01)
9471.l988(02):i
9483.1988(01)
9483. 1990 (02) •.
9554.1994(02);;
9471.1987(02);
9441.1993(02) '
9471.1988(03)
9472.1994(01)1,
9488. 1986 (03) :
9441. 1987 (20K
9497. 1986 (Ola)
9441.1987(32)
9455.1994(01) ;
9441.1988(42) j
9441.1986(45) !
9498.1994(10)
9571.1993(01)
9441.1995(16)
9441.11991(13)
9441.1987(31) '
9432.1988(05) |
9483.1988(15) !
9592.1994(05) \
9441.1995(08) :
9441.1993(05) '.
9592.1995(01) :
9571.1993(02)
9441.1994(18)
9592.1994(10) .
9441.1994 (22) '
9441.1994(20)
9476.1988(01) i
9441.1984(20) !
9441.1992(25) i
9488.1993(01) '
9441. 1995 (Oj^fe
06/04/84
06/05/85
04/30/87
11/30/86
06/29/87
09/02/87
05/02/90
09/30/87
01/13/88
03/21/86
11/14/85
06/08/87
07/30/88
12/31/94
02/28/95
04/29/88
01/27/88
08/15/90
01/05/94
12/21/87
02/28/93
07/30/88
12/31/94
03/30/86
03/31/87
05/30/86
04/30/87
12/31/94
09/30/88
05/30/86
10/31/94
07/30/93
04/30/95
07/01/91
04/30/87
10/30/88
07/30/88
06/10/94
03/07/95
04/29/93
08/10/95
11/05/93
07/11/94
09/28/94
08/11/94
08/02/94
01/29/88
08/16/84
08/25/92
12/06/93
^02/28/95
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 37
ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION EXEMPTION
EPA'S INTERPRETATION OF THE EXEMPTION IN 40 CFR 261.3 (a) (2) (iv) (F) , A NEW SECTION OF EPA'S REGULATIONS ON CARBAMATE LISTING RULE
EXEMPTION FOR MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTION ASH FROM HAZARDOUS WASTE REGULATION
EXEMPTION FOR WASTEWATER DISCHARGES AND GENERATOR ACCUMULATION PROVISIONS
EXEMPTION FROM PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS FOR WASTE WATER TREATMENT UNITS
EXPORT OF TREATABILITY SAMPLES
LEAKING OR DAMAGED EXPLOSIVES
LIME STABILIZED WASTE PICKLE LIQUOR SLUDGE EXCLUSION
LIME-STABILIZED WASTE PICKLE LIQUOR SLUDGE EXEMPTION FOR LIME-AMMONIA STABILIZED IRON OXIDE SLUDGE
MANAGEMENT OF WASTES PRIOR TO INTRODUCTION INTO SEWER
MINIMUM HEAT CONTENT REQUIREMENTS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTES BURNED IN BIFs
MIXED RADIOACTIVE HOSPITAL WASTES AND THE DOMESTIC SEWAGE EXCLUSION
MIXTURES OF PICKLE LIQUOR AND OTHER WASTES AND THE LIME STABILIZED WASTE PICKLE LIQUOR SLUDGE EXEMPTION
OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION EXCLUSION
OIL FIELD OPERATIONS, EXEMPTIONS FOR CERTAIN
ON-SITE TREATMENT EXEMPTION, REINTERPRETATION OF
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR REMOTE SECONDARY CONTAINMENT AREA FOR DIRECT OFFLOADING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE-DERIVED FUEL INTO A CEMENT KILN
PERMIT-EXEMPT STATUS OF SLUDGE DRYERS ADDED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNITS
PETROLEUM REFINING WASTES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR WWTUs
PRECIPITATION WHICH IS CORROSIVE DUE TO CONTACT WITH EXEMPT WASTES (COAL GASIFICATION ASH)
QUANTUM TECH PLASMA ARC UNIT - REGULATORY CLASSIFICATION
RDStD PERMIT FOR A SLUDGE DRYING PROCESS IN A WASTEWATER SYSTEM
RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS FOR SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS SUBJECT TO LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
RECYCLING OF COKE BY-PRODUCT RESIDUES
RECYCLING PETROLEUM REFINERY OILY WASTES
REGULATION AND PERMITTING OF LABORATORIES
REGULATION OF OILY HAZARDOUS PETROLEUM REFINERY WASTE
REGULATION OF SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS UNDER THE SEPTEMBER 10, 1992 RECYCLED USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS
REGULATORY DETERMINATION OF THE PRIMER NEUTRALIZATION UNIT "POPPING FURNACE"
REGULATORY DETERMINATION ON THE STATUS OF A LEAD/COPPER METAL PRODUCED BY METALS RECYCLING TECHNOLOGIES (MRT)
REGULATORY DETERMINATION ON THE STATUS OF PRECIOUS METAL RECOVERY FURNACES
REGULATORY STATUS OF HIGH PURITY CHEMICALS THAT ARE INITIALLY USED BY CUSTOMERS AND THEN SOLD TO OTHER BUSINESSES FOR FURTHER USE
REGULATORY STATUS OF LABORATORY WASTEWATER
REGULATORY STATUS OF SEPARATOR WATER AND EVAPORATOR UNITS AT DRY CLEANERS
REGULATORY STATUS OF SEPARATOR WATER AND THE USE OF SEPARATOR WATER EVAPORATORS AT DRY-CLEANING FACILITIES
REGULATORY STATUS OF SOLDER DRIPPINGS GENERATED DURING RADIATOR REPAIR OPERATIONS
REQUIREMENTS FOR DISPOSAL OF DISCHARGED M-44 CYANIDE CAPSULES THAT ORIGINALLY CONTAINED A SODIUM CYANIDE PESTICIDE
RESPONSES TO ACCIDENTAL SPILLS OF LISTED OR CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTES
REVISED IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY FOR CITY OF CHICAGO V. EOF MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTION (MWC) ASH SUPREME COURT DECISION
SCRAP AMALGAM FILLINGS FROM DENTISTS, DISPOSAL OF
SCRAP METAL REMOVED FROM SPENT ALKALINE BATTERIES THAT ARE RECYCLED
SECONDARY MATERIALS REGULATION - USED SULFURIC ACID
SEDIMENT SAMPLE DISPOSAL
SLUDGE DEHYDRATION EQUIPMENT AS A WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT
STABILIZED WASTE PICKLE LIQUOR FROM STEEL/IRON INDUSTRY
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
TC RULE DELAY OF IMPOSITION ON OIL FILTERS
TCLP PARTICLE SIZE REDUCTION EXEMPTION FOR MUNITIONS
TEST SAMPLES, EXCLUSION FROM HAZARDOUS WASTE
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION APPLICABILITY TO A BAGHOUSE SYSTEM
TRANSPORTATION AND DISPOSAL OF SHOCK SENSITIVE OR EXPLOSIVE MATERIALS
TRANSPORTATION OF USED OIL TO LOCATIONS WHERE USED OIL CAN BE MIXED WITH CRUDE OIL
USED BATTERIES RETURNED FOR REGENERATION EXEMPTION
USED CRANKCASE OIL DISPOSED OF BY DO-IT-YOURSELFERS
USED OIL, BURNING OF OFF-SPECIFICATION FUEL - DUMPING
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM, SOLVENT RECOVERY STILL BOTTOMS IN
WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT EXEMPTION
9471.1988(02)
9441.1995(25)
9573.00-01
9441.1987(96)
9522.1992(01)
9441.1992(09)
9471.1988(05)
9441.1987(74)
9441.1987(54)
9441.1986(73)
9498.1994(02)
9441.1986(94)
9441.1987(08)
9441.1987(04)
9441.1989(27)
9453.1987(08)
9483.1988(02)
9503.52-1A
9483.1990(03)
9441.1986(31)
9488.1991(04)
9503.51-1A
9454.1994(01)
9441.1992(37)
9441.1993(03)
9441.1988(39)
9493.1991(01)
9592.1994(07)
9489.1994(02)
9441.1994 (23)
9496.1993(01)
9441.1994(24)
9441.1992(01)
9471.1993(01)
9432.1993(02)
9441.1993(07)
9442.1993(05)
9471.1986(01)
9441.1995(11)
9441.1989(22)
9441.1986(79)
9441.1988(23)
9441.1989(12)
9432.1987(08)
9441.1990(16)
9523.00-14
9441.1991(15)
9442.1991(16)
9431.1989(03)
9432.1987(01)
9527.1992(01)
9592.1994(04)
9497.1991(01)
9441.1987(64)
9441.1986(40)
9441.1985(43)
9431.1989(02)
04/29/88
08/03/95
09/18/92
12/10/87
01/16/92
05/04/92
11/30/88
09/02/87
07/13/87
09/25/86
05/20/94
12/19/86
01/28/87
01/13/87
06/06/89
12/15/87
01/28/88
01/02/86
09/20/90
04/21/86
09/30/91
12/24/85
05/09/94
10/29/92
03/05/93
08/30/88
01/08/91
07/22/94
09/19/94
08/19/94
12/27/93
08/30/94
01/15/92
06/02/93
10/22/93
04/29/93
12/23/93
09/29/86
03/22/95
05/17/89
10/20/86
06/06/88
03/31/89
08/03/87
06/19/90
03/14/86
09/25/91
05/01/91
06/05/89
03/17/87
11/03/92
06/09/94
03/04/91
08/13/87
07/31/86
12/17/85
09/26/89
-------
ji; I i: :it:ii : -r.= P ^:;
S,!i!
': :«• it i- ! iiilH ijlirBl;,;, f 11,1;- « ; -_ < ;r^i; f; -: fts*,' : siS, ^i»; bjflj; --jf jHs (;•*,; ; jjbij,; rife-;?: ~ *
is i"i = a '« 5 i I « '1 MI i !» rS:;*! B: -« : —- i :: 3 I
ipP IP =* = - I b F^ ft ,|( I b bb i|r,| ,ijb, =1*^-, ;1 b=, ,^1, -, ^fj—,,! yjbwb=-, = ,,, ^^f^f^^f^f^—^ b^bbl bb ^T-~ b ^biP - = «•" = f I
,.„„,.
--* *--:- '
KEBKJRD IHOEX,
MOULD REGENERATION,EXEMPTION:APPLY TO VARIOUS'TYPES OF LOCATIONS AT WHICH LBAD^ACID BATTERIES'ARB,REGENERATED?
ZINC OXIDE RECLAIMED FROM KILNS
iFTOter Press I i : : ; J ! ! | !• i • :: ;s «
•FILTER PRESS IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT, EXCLUSION FOR
! MliFILTER PRESS PROPOSED AS PART OF CORRECTIVE ACTION - NOT EXCLUDED FROM PERMITTING;; ] i, i ?
Fossil Fuels
•FOSSIL FUEL COMBUSTION WASTE EXCLUSION
•MINING EXCLUSION FOR SMELTER SLAG
•STATUS OF FOSSIL FUEL COMBUSTION WASTE EXCLUSION :
COAL/FOSSIL FUEL COMBUSTION WASTES EXCLUDED FROM SUBTITLE C PENDING FURTHER STUDY "
FOSSIL FUEL COMBUSTION WASTE EXCLUSION IN 261.4 (b) (4), FUEL MIXTURES
Gaseous Emissions t
INCINERATORS THAT RECEIVE GASEOUS EMISSIONS, RCRA EXCLUSION, CAA APPLIES ' ' ' '
Mining Waste
•DEFINITION OF FORMERLY BEVILL EXEMPT WASTE
•EXPLORATION OR PRODUCTION OF CRUDE OIL, NATURAL GAS, OR GEOTHERMAL ENERGY - WASTE EXCLUSION
•MINING EXCLUSION FOR SMELTER SLAG
•MINING WASTE EXCLUSION REINTERPRETATION
•MINING WASTE, K064, AND 3004(x)
•ORE AND MINERAL EXTRACTION, BENEFICIATION AND PROCESSING EXCLUSION APPLICABILITY
•PRODUCED WATERS FROM NATURAL GAS EXPLORATION - EXCLUSION
•REGULATORY STATUS OF NATURAL GAS CONDENSATE
BEVILL AMENDMENT APPLIED TO COAL GASIFICATION FACILITY
CHARACTERISTIC TESTS FOR DETERMINING THE HAZARDOUS CHARACTERISTICS OF MINING WASTES
CLARIFICATION OF CERTAIN ISSUES REGARDING OIL AND GAS WASTES
DECISION DEADLINES FOR RETROFITTING WAIVER REQUESTS
DROSS FROM ALUMINUM SMELTING USED IN MANUFACTURE OF CEMENT
INDUSTRIAL FURNACES BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTES AND THE RESIDUALS GENERATED (LOUISIANA REG)
INTERPRETATION OF THE BEVILL EXEMPT STATUS OF WASTES AT THE MAGCORP FACILITY
MINERAL PROCESSING RESIDUALS FROM COMBUSTION UNITS BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL
MINING LABORATORY HASTES UNDER 40 CFR 261.4 (b) (7) - EXCLUSION OF > *
MINING WASTE AS NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE
MINING WASTE EXCLUSION FOR A FERROALLOY FACILITY
MINING WASTE EXCLUSION INCLUDING PRIMARY PROCESSING BUT NOT SUBSEQUENT STEPS
MINING WASTE REGULATED UNDER SUBTITLE D RATHER THAN SUBTITLE C ,i
PHOSPHATE AND GAS PROCESSING INDUSTRY WASTES
RESIDUAL WATER DERIVED FROM AN EXEMPT WASTE (COAL ASH) IS EXEMPT
Totally Enclosed Treatment Units •;,
AUTHORIZATION OF STATE PROGRAMS TO IMPLEMENT LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS PROGRAMS
CHEMICAL AGENT/MUNITIONS SYSTEM (CADMS) IS NOT TOTALLY ENCLOSED AND SUGGESTED RD&D PERMIT
EVAPORATOR USED TO REMOVE WATER FROM HAZARDOUS WASTE ; 3
FILTER PRESS PROPOSED AS PART OF CORRECTIVE ACTION - NOT EXCLUDED FROM PERMITTING l
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION AND ACCUMULATION PROVISIONS APPLICABILITY TO AN ASH TREATMENT FACILITY
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION APPLICABILITY TO A BAGHOUSE SYSTEM
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION FOR SCRAP METAL RECYCLER
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION FOR WET-AIR OXIDATION UNIT(VERTECH)
TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN PIPELINES LEADING TO A WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT i
EXEMPTION
=- - •'""=_-!_ - _ . k
i - , . 9iS4-3-=jtil;9-95=( Oil) -.
!94,44, 1988X023^
^T5^"= -- ;*c=b,, ^M. ^JLJ ^1 bb : ; ., bi 1 J , Id
+ - - =
- - , - , -, ,9432tl,984,(;04).
1 -- i V sCif" 3 S E *t I:is94i33'JU)87i(llO):i
' , "" v ^-944;1, ,1986(16)
, :; , ; ,,,;,194:41,,1984'C23):,
. " ' . """"."^£*9'|14lJlj995-0.6) ."'
" " .-" - 94i41J,i984i(i20)
: ---- _--.: [^ ;-;;j94a)l,l:98l;(:01):;
" - ' 9441/1984(15)
i ,; 9441.1995;(12)
,9441.1984;(11)
"9441.1984(23)
" - "' ' "9441. 4985=135) ';
"-'- '"- > "?9571.i:986:(04) '
1 V """9571-. 3.989X01)
: _ ;: , :v;'944i;. 1984X21)
, 9571,.ii993,(01)
' :9441. 1987X76):
_-".,; >443.. 1985X09),
, - "--. *""9571,.i993:(02);"
9571.1987X01)
9441.1989X01) ,
9494.1987(02) '
9441,1994X05) ;
9441.1984(19)
~~ -9441.1984(09);!
= 9441.1986(72) :s
9441.1986(48) "-
'9441.1986(81) :*
9441.1986(55) j
--i= A -9441.1986(62) '
-Tb-^i ^pib;-, ^,^f _-~f --~fff Jbbbl j , •
*.- '( '£-. •'-''' S , iffs Ijjp! IS
01/12/95;
01/26/88,; ;
i; ;
05/30/84,
06/12/87) i
02/28/86
07/31/84
04/30/95
08/16/84
01/13/81
07/31/84
03/31/95
04/30/84
07/31/84
10/30/85
07/30/86
01/30/89
07/31/84
07/30/93
09/15/87
10/03/85
11/05/93;!
10/08/87
02/07/89 ,
04/15/87
03/23/94;
08/15/84
05/09/84!;
09/16/86 i1
06/10/86
11/03/86
07/16/86 i
,07/05/83,^,
06/16/86
i !
06/24/86 '
11/19/85 '
05/01/87 '••
06/12/87
08/28/87
12/22/86
02/11/86
02/06/86
08/19/86
•
; j i
\^ m j
jj ;| 1
",- -- ;
.,
— ' : '
•- c f
_
•5 ( i
.".
= L; ; L
_; -L ^
- -
a ;! i
I-
* =L h
--.- : j
- ; :
„
•j i I
-" f :
=
-
= =
:
(See Exclusions)
!«i;(
i:, fcf,ii
II
JXREF
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 39
EXPANSIONS
(See Permit Conditions) (See also Interim Status Process)
EXPLORATION WASTE
(See Mining Waste)
EXPLOSIVE WASTES
(See Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
EXPORT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
(See also Transporters, Manifest)
"EXPORT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
"EXPORT OF RECYCLABLE MATERIALS
"EXPORT OF RESTRICTED WASTE
"EXPORT REQUIREMENTS FOR TRANSPORTATION THROUGH TRANSIT COUNTRIES
"EXPORTING HAZARDOUS WASTE
"HAZARDOUS WASTE EXPORT RULE FOR BATTERY RECLAMATION
"NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR EXPORTED WASTES
BATTERY RECYCLING AND EXPORT
CANADIAN MANIFEST FOR SHIPMENTS ENTERING THE U.S.
DO VESSELS TRANSPORTING A RCRA REGULATED HAZARDOUS WASTE REQUIRE AN EPA ID NUMBER FOR TRANSPORT BETWEEN THE U.S. AND BELGIUM?
EXPORT OF HAZARDOUS WASTES UTILIZED FOR PRECIOUS METALS RECLAMATION
EXPORT OF PETROLEUM-CONTAMINATED SOIL
EXPORT OF TREATABILITY SAMPLES
EXPORT REQUIREMENTS FOR SPENT BATTERIES SENT TO FOREIGN COUNTRIES FOR RECYCLING
EXPORTERS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TO MEXICO, RESPONSIBILITIES OF
EXPORTING CHARACTERISTICALLY HAZARDOUS SLUDGE FOR RECLAMATION
EXPORTING PETROLEUM WASTE TO SOUTH AMERICA
HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION OF "NICKEL MATTE" BY-PRODUCT
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS APPLIED TO EXPORTED WASTES
MOVEMENT OF NICKEL CADMIUM BATTERIES FROM MEXICO TO JAPAN VIA THE UNITED STATES
RECOVERED LEAD AND LEAD ALLOYS FROM BATTERIES
REGULATORY STATUS OF SPENT PHOTOCONDUCTOR DRUMS FROM PHOTOCOPYING MACHINES
REPROCESSING OF BATTERIES
SALE AND SCRAPPING OF DOT'S MARITIME OBSOLETE VESSELS FROM THE NATIONAL DEFENSE RESERVE FLEET
EXPOSURE INFORMATION
(See Risk Assessment)
EXTENSION
(See also Land Disposal Restrictions)
EXTENSION TO GENERATOR ACCUMULATION TIME LIMITS FOR UNFORESEEN, TEMPORARY CIRCUMSTANCES
EXTENSIONS TO STORAGE PROHIBITION AND LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
POTENTIALLY CONFLICTING REGULATION OF INFILTRATION GALLERIES BY THE OGWDW AND OSW
UNDERGROUND INJECTION WELLS USED IN HYDROCARBON RECOVERY
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
9455.1986(01)
9456.1986(01)
9551.1987(22)
9455.1995(02)
9456.1987(01)
9497.1986(013)
9455.1994(01)
9497.1987(01)
9462.1985(01)
9455.19"95(0l)
9455.1991(01)
9462.1993(01)
9441.1992(09)
9455.1987(01)
9455.1987(02)
9453.1993(02)
9455.1989(01)
9441.1994(32)
9551.1991(07)
9452.1993(01)
9455.1991(03)
9441.1992(39)
9497.1987(02)
9441.1994(21)
/ /
09/30/86
10/30/86
10/31/87
03/31/95
08/30/87
05/30/86
12/31/94
02/12/87
11/29/85
02/17/95
02/05/91
02/18/93
05/04/92
06/19/87
06/15/87
03/23/93
06/27/89
12/23/94
04/23/91
01/28/93
12/10/91
11/10/92
02/19/87
08/05/94
XREF
XREF
9453.1987(05)
9555.1987(01)
9521.1991(01)
9521.1991(02)
08/12/87
10/02/87
08/27/91
08/30/91
F-WASTES
(See Listed Hazardous Waste, Hazardous Waste Identification)
XREF
-------
jj I
•m
I in:
p: I
07/02/3$
! I- i«i ;g J "-
KEYHQRD 1BOEX
F
Page No, 40
!ff"-9=l^sf~=t°~- j :
FACILITY •-..--._ ' -
(See;TSDFs)
FACILITY7 MANAGEMENT PLAN' "' ~"~*^~""''
: ; ; ,; ai ; ~
FIELD ASSESSMENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PLAN: FOR THE OCCIDENTAL INCINERATOR
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS FOR FY 1986
RCRA PROGRAM DIRECTIONS - PRIORITY TO ENVIRONMENTALLY SIGNIFICANT FACILITIES
FEDERAL FACILITIES i
•RECORDING STATE-REGULATED HASTES ON THE UltWM
CORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES
CORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES
CORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES, ISSUES AND NATIONAL PRIORITIES FOR
CORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES, NATIONAL PRIORITIES
CORRECTIVE ACTION/PERMIT ISSUES - U.S. ARMY - ABERDEEN PROVING GROUNDS
DELISTING PETITION OF NITROGEN TETROXIDE RINSATE
HSHA APPLIED TO FEDERAL FACILITIES (DOE-OAK RIDGE)
MIXED WASTE (DOE FACILITIES), DEFINITION OF
OPERATOR AT DOE OAK RIDGE FACILITY, DETERMINATION OF
OPERATOR AT GOVERNMENT-OWNED CONTRACTOR-OPERATED (GOCO) FACILITIES
ROLE OF AUTHORIZED STATES IN DISPUTE RESOLUTION
SIGNATORIES FOR DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PERMIT APPLICATIONS
STATE REGULATION OF FEDERAL AGENCIES FOR PURPOSE OF INTERIM AUTHORIZATION
VIOLATION OF EPA HAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFEST REGULATIONS BY FEDERAL FACILITIES
XREF
DOD
DOE
ARMY CHEMICAL/MUNITIONS SYSTEM, REGULATORY STATUS OF V
CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL FACILITIES AND IRP ACTIVITIES
DEMILITARIZATION OF MUNITIONS
DEPARTMENT OF ARMY MUNITION DEACTIVATION POPPING FURNACE =._._ \
DISCARDED WASTEWATER AT A CORROSION CONTROL FACILITY :" '-'i: '''
DOD MUNITIONS BECOME SOLID WASTE SUBJECT TO RCRA WHEN THERE IS AN INTENT TO DISPOSE OR DESTROY, THEM;: :
DOD'S IRP PROGRAM AND RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION I.
INCINERATORS FOR DESTRUCTION OF NERVE AGENTS, HIGH PRIORITY PERMITTING : "".:". • '
INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM (IRP) - DOD " ' J
OPEN BURNING/OPEN DETONATION AT DOD FACILITIES : ; :r ;- • -- H;- -•::
PERMIT APPLICATIONS FOR DESTRUCTION OF NERVE AGENTS ' ! '
QUALIFICATION OF AN ENGINEER FROM THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS AS INDEPENDENT WITH RESPECT TO AN ARMY FACILITY
REACTIVE WASTE - EXPLOSIVITY
SUMMARY OF ASSISTANCE BRANCH PERMITTING COMMENTS
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT SAMPLING PLAN FOR HOLLOMAN AIR FORCE BASE
TCLP PARTICLE SIZE REDUCTION EXEMPTION FOR MUNITIONS
USING A GENERATOR IDENTIFICATION NUMBER AND/OR MANIFEST TO DETERMINE LIABILITY
VOLATILIZATION OF SOLVENTS COUNTED AS SOLVENTS USED
WASTE-AS-FUEL RULES AT DOD FACILITIES, IMPLEMENTATION
BYPRODUCT MATERIAL AND MIXED WASTE, AEA AND DOE INTERFACE ,,:
CLOSURE OF A DOE SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT THAT LOST INTERIM STATUS
MIXED WASTES AT DOE FACILITIES, REGULATION OF :
?i't;;j:,!i !,; : / fit!,
9505.198,6(01) 09/18/86
9505.1985(01) 11/13/85
•9501.198:7[02) 12/14/87
XREF.
9452,.198!4(03)
9502:. 1986 (06) .."
9502.00-2
9502. 1986 ('01)
'9502:. 1986 104)
9502.1986(09)
9433.1990(07)
9502,. 1985 (06) ,
9503:. 1985(01),-
9432.1984(01)
9472.1987(01)
9541.1987(01)
,9522M985(01)
9542. 1980(05), _
9452. 1984(02) ,
9527M985I01) ;
9502:.1986(14)
9441.1987(03)
;9488;. 1987(03) ._
!9444!. 1991 (05) :i
:9441i.l985(31)
9502i.l986(17)
950lM986(01)
;9502'.1986(20) '
i9502i
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No.
Inventory
FEDERAL FACILITIES INVENTORY UNDER RCRA 3016
Open Burning/Open Detonation (OB/OD)
"INTERIM STATUS FOR MILITARY FACILITIES OPEN BURNING AREA ™n,TMTM^ DTT-C
CLARIFICATION OF THE USE AND MANAGEMENT OF MOUNTAIN HOME AIR FORCE BASE FIRE TRAINING PITS
9502.1987(03) 03/06/81
SUBJECT TO RCRA WHEN THERE IS AN INTENT TO DISPOSE OR DESTROY THEM
FIRE TRAINING PITS, REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR
OPEN BURNING/OPEN DETONATION AT DOD FACILITIES
THERMAL TREATMENT UNITS, SCOPE OF SUBPART X
9441
9489
9441
9441
9489
9502
9489
1984(04)
1988(02)
.1987(03)
.1985(31)
.1987(02)
.1986(16)
.1988(01)
02/18/84
08/11/88
01/07/87
10/03/85
07/22/87
09/22/86
05/18/88
FERROUS METALS
(See Hazardous Waste Identification)
FIFRA
(See Agricultural Waste)
FILTER PRESS
(See Exclusions)
FINAL COVER
(See also Closure Process)
CLOSURE PLAN COMMENTS/ISSUES (CRUCIBLE STEEL)
FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
(See also Closure Process, Post-Closure)
*CORRECTIVE ACTION BEYOND FACILITY BOUNDARY - FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REQUIREMENT
*FINANCIAL ASSURANCE
•FINANCIAL ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
•GENERATOR CLOSURE/FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR TANK SYSTEMS
•SUBSTITUTION OF STATE FINANCIAL MECHANISM FOR EPA
ABILITY TO PASS THE RCRA FINANCIAL TEST FOR ENVIRONMENTAL OBLIGATIONS
AUTHORITY TO ENFORCE 264 SUBPART H COMPLIANCE AT FACILITIES LOCATED ON STATE-OWNED LAND
cSlCATION OF CERTAIN FINANCIAL ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO PERMITTED HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES UNDER RCRA
FACILITY'S OPERATING LIFE, DETERMINATION OF
FINANCIAL ASSURANCE FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION BEYOND FACILITY BOUNDARIES
FINANCIAL ASSURANCE INSTRUMENTS
FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REGULATIONS RELATED TO BANKRUPTCY (LTV)
FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS - CERTIFYING CLOSURE
LOSS OF FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY COVERAGE ON INTERIM STATUS AND PERMIT ISSUANCE AimmDT,,,-PTr,M
PART B FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY INFO. REQ. FOR OWNERS/OPERATORS IN STATES WITH ONLY PHASE 1 AUTHORIZATION
REQUIREMENTS OF A FACILITY GENERATING, STORING, AND MANIFESTING F001
RISK RETENTION GROUPS AND FINANCIAL ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
Bond Ratings
ACCEPTABLE BOND RATINGS FOR USE IN SUBTITLE C FINANCIAL TEST
CLOSURE COST ESTIMATES
THIRD PARTY LETTERS OF CREDIT - CONVERTIBLE BONDS
Corporate Guarantee
CORPORATE GUARANTEE AS ALTERNATIVE MEANS TO MEET FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF / /
9476.1984(05) 09/18/84
XREF
9502
9477
9477
9483
9477
9477
9477
9477
9477
9502
9477
9477
9477
9528
9477
9475
9477
.1986(10)
.1987(12)
.1984(09)
.1989(01)
.1983(04)
.1994(06)
.1984(02)
.1994(05)
.1984(07)
.1989(01)
.1984(05)
.1986(12)
.1990(02)
.1985(09)
.1982(01)
.1986(01a)
.00-5
05/30/86
11/30/87
12/30/84
04/30/89
09/30/83
10/07/94
01/30/84
08/19/94
12/03/84
03/02/89
06/06/84
07/23/86
05/28/90
11/27/85
05/24/82
10/30/86
11/23/87
9477.1989(01) 05/16/89
9477.1983(03) 12/09/83
9477.1986(16) 09/04/86
9477.1986(02) 01/03/86
-------
;;:! fe i-s-i^rihir H- ->>*r '! cil i !• f! ' « ; ; MI i ^-i
ill !S iNEM: :• tit! t: is S; I B ! ! H : IN
n i ,LI i ill "5 » Bl • ice r1 r:
1= - sp= = =1 = = :I n : h=h=*= s sis 3 S -^=--,-if= f s=s 5 = SJ- = = „
r i i -:S - 4 i: : . F: J-= fc i! , = ; - ^ 1 ^lfa= H -W Hf ' ^ ^ VE f F
01/02/96
KEYWORD IWDEX
Page No. 42
: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS" BOARD STATEMENT' 106 AND ITS AFFECTS ON TUB RCRA FINANCIAL TEST
Cost, Estimates , 1 - = .
; i*FINANCIAL ASSURANCE COST ADJUSTMENTS ON A QUARTERLY BASIS :
•FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS/CLOSURE COSTS
•GNP V. CJDP FOR COST ADJUSTMENTS UNDER RCRA
: CLARIFICATION OF CERTAIN CLOSURE COST ESTIMATE REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO FACILITIES SEEKING A PERMIT UNDER 40 CFR 264
CLOSURE COST ESTIMATES BASED ON THIRD PARTY COSTS
FINANCIAL TEST (UNION CARBIDE, 3/86)
PETROLEUM REFINERY SLUDGE REGULATIONS -
Insurance :
LIABILITY INSURANCE FOR ACCIDENTAL AND SUDDEN ACCIDENTAL OCCURRENCES
LIABILITY REQUIREMENTS r : ! i
TERMINATION OF INSURANCE
CAPTIVE INSURANCE COMPANIES TO COMPLY WITH LIABILITY COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS, CREATION OF '.
CERTIFICATIONS OF LIABILITY INSURANCE, HH FACILITY
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPAIRMENT LIABILITY INSURANCE
EXCLUSIONS FOR PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS IN RCRA TSDF INSURANCE POLICIES, GUIDANCE ON
INSURANCE COVERAGE LIMITS
LIABILITY REGULATIONS
RISK RETENTION GROUPS AND FINANCIAL ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS ,, . |
Liability
•FINANCIAL ASSURANCE •" - '. '
•FINANCIAL TEST LIABILITIES :
•LIABILITY REQUIREMENTS : ; i
•LIABILITY REQUIREMENTS OF SUBSIDIARIES
CAPTIVE INSURANCE COMPANIES TO COMPLY WITH LIABILITY COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS, CREATION OF ,
CORPORATE GUARANTEE FOR LIABILITY COVERAGE . "'..'..
EFFECTS OF THE SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR RULE ON VARIOUS GENERATOR WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES - - :
EXCLUSIONS FOR PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS IN TSDF INSURANCE POLICIES • '• -"- • •
FACILITIES UNABLE TO MEET LIABILITY COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS
FINANCIAL ASSURANCE FOR LIABILITY THROUGH RISK RETENTION GROUP
FINANCIAL TEST (UNION CARBIDE, 3/86) :, ' •
GENERATOR LIABILITY FOR DELISTED WASTE RELEASES * ' -'- ' ;
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION PROGRAMS, CERCLA AND RCRA LIABILITY OF MUNICIPAL SPONSORS;OF
LIABILITY COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS WITH RESPECT TO LOSS OF INTERIM STATUS
LIABILITY REGULATIONS
LIABILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR FACILITIES ACTIVELY SEEKING A RCRA PERMIT
: OWNER/OPERATOR UNDER RCRA AND CERCLA, DEFINITION OF - -i
PERMIT ISSUES REGARDING ON-SITE TREATMENT BY FLUIDIZED BED INCINERATION
POTENTIAL LIABILITY OF DISPOSAL FACILITIES WHEN DISPOSING OF CONTAMINATED DEBRIS
RECYCLABLE CLOTH WIPERS AND DISPOSABLE INDUSTRIAL WIPERS USED TO CLEAN UP HAZARDC IS WASTES
SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR (SQG) REQUIREMENTS AND LIABILITIES "
SUBPART H FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS
: THIRD-PARTY LIABILITY COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS ' i \
Liability Coverage
•FINANCIAL ASSURANCE
•FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR INACTIVE SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
BODILY INJURY/PROPERTY DAMAGE CLAIMS AT TSDFs
RISK RETENTION GROUPS AND FINANCIAL ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS '. i
9*77.1994(01.) 04/01/94
FLAMMABLE
94]77U994!(02i)
94:77',a986'(ll;)
94i77:,a994 (03,)
9477i.l994'(04i)
9477J984(01)
94-77.1986(10-)
9444!.1990(05)
9477.1984(08)
9477'.1986:(03)
9477,.1983(02)
9477,1986 (04)
9477.1982(03)
9477sl984 (06)
9477.00-6
9477.1984(04)
9477'.1986(09)
9477j.OO-5
9477:. 1988 (04)
9477.1986(05)
9477:. 1986 (03)
9477.1987(05).
9477,.1986(04)
9477i.l986(13)
9451.1986(01)
9477,.1988(01)
9477,.1987(10)
9477!.1987(09)
9477,1986(10)
9433U985(04)
9441:. 1986(09)
9477.1987(03)
9477'. 1986(09)
94771.1987(01)
•94321.1987(12) —
9522i.l985(05)
9477. 1993(01)
9441.1986(53)
9451.1991(01)
9477.1983(01)
9477;.1987(11)
9477.1988(06)
9477.1985(02)
9477.1990(01)
9477.00-5
06/30/94
06/30/86
06/30/94
07/25/94
01/12/84
06/25/86
10/17/90
11/30/84
02/28/86
02/28/83
03/20/86
10/07/82
11/28/84
11/23/87
11/20/84
07/24/86!
. 11/23/87;
10/30/88
03/31/86
02/28/86
06/30/87;
03/20/86
08/15/86
03/17/86
02/25/88
11/10/87
11/10/87
06/25/86
10/23/85
01/28/86
04/01/87
07/24/86
03/02/87
-10/28/87
12/13/85
10/04/93
07/03/86
03/13/91
01/05/83
11/10/87
12/31/88
01/31/85
01/25/90
11/23/87
Uj^i I
Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
XREF
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 43
FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT
•POST-CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS FOR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS LOCATED IN A 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN
FOOD PROCESSING WASTE
(See Hazardous Waste Identification)
FORMALDEHYDE
(See Hazardous Waste Identification)
FOSSIL FUELS
(See Mining Waste, Exclusions)
FREE LIQUIDS
(See Land Disposal Restrictions, Paint Filter Test) (See also SW-846)
/ /
12/31/84
FREON
FUEL
(See Hazardous Waste Identification)
(See Hazardous Waste Fuels, Used Oil)
FURNACE
(See Incineration)
GAS CONDENSATE
(See Land Disposal Facilities)
GAS PROCESSING WASTES
PHOSPHATE AND GAS PROCESSING INDUSTRY WASTES
GASEOUS EMISSIONS
(See Exclusions)
GENERATORS
(See also Hazardous Waste Identification, Import, Export of Hazardous Waste)
™ING/BLENDING OF UNUSED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT (XYLENE) WITH USED OIL
*GENERATOR AT NAVAL VESSEL OPERATIONS
SrSE^P^of^BILE RECYCLING UNIT OPERATOR
'HAZARDOUS WASTE EXPORT RULE FOR BATTERY RECLAMATION
*LAB PACKS AT GENERATOR SITES
'TRANSFER FACILITY AS CENTRAL COLLECTION POINT
XREF
9484.1984(02)
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF / /
9443.1983(04) 07/05/83
XREF
XREF
9442
9432
9483
9453
9497
9453
9461
.1985(01)
.1985(02)
.1989(01)
.1984(03)
.1986(Ola)
.1988(02)
.1991(01)
12/30/85
05/30/85
04/30/89
12/30/84
05/30/86
01/30/88
11/01/91
-------
r. i t=\i:*_ r
HI; I i|
ts! . I • !• ,™. a li
• •'
iiM;.;1
i:31 MM I
ilK .1.1 I
i:i ^i 5 ?ii !
01/02/96
is;
_, „ KBWORD.IHOBlt _ , ,„
:r:s I _ d i "*L : a —
Page ;Bo,j
TRBATABILITY'STUDIES ON HAZARDOUS WASTE SAMPLES, 5 PERMIT; KEQUIREMRNTS * "2
^TREATMENT IN;A GENERATOR'S 90-DAY CONTAINMENT BUILDING M V r , "
, APPLICABILITY:OF RCRA USED OIL REGULATIONS TO USED OIL CONTAINED IN DISCARDED HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES^ ;
j! ijATON BATTERIES, GEHERATOR DEFINITION FOR : ; ft I f :
CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS HASTES GENERATED AT PRIMARY METAL SMELTING AND REFINING SITES j
,f ; iCIJWIFICATION OF HOH PROVISIONS IN CERCLA APPLY TO "SERVICE STATION DEALERS" THAT HANDLE USED OIL 1 f •
• 'CLARIFICATION OF THE APPLICABILITY OF CERTAIN RCRA REQUIREMENTS TO COMMON EXCAVATION-TYPE ACTIVITIES' ' "
CLARIFICATION OF USED OIL RULES AS THEY APPLY TO DO-IT-YOURSELF OIL CHANGERS •
iCLARIFICATION ON THE AMOUNT, TYPE, AND FREQUENCY OF TRAINING REQUIRED FOR PERSONNEL HANDLING HAZARDOUS HASTE AT FACILITIES
--• CONDITIONALLY EXEMPT SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR PROVISIONS .i«i">o
:;EPA-S CURRENT INTERPRETATION OF THE REQUIREMENTS IN 40 CFR SECTION 262.12 REGARDING EPA ID NUMBERS
iBXPLOSIVES PRESENTING AN IMMEDIATE SAFETY THREAT AND EXPLOSIVES STORED DURING ANALYSIS
GENERATOR DETERMINATION-CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS '
GENERATOR LIABILITY FOR DELISTED WASTE RELEASES i
; GENERATOR RESPONSIBILITIES FOR IMPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS HASTE
;* GENERATOR USE OF TOTAL CONSTITUENT ANALYSIS IN LIEU OF THE EP OR TCLP TESTS ' '"' '
GENERATOR WITH RESPECT TO REGULATION OF OPERATIONAL WASTES FROM SHIPS, DEFINITION
LIABILITY OF A SERVICING COMPANY AS A GENERATOR OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
'-. MICRO-CLEAR REGULATORY STATUS
MOBILE SOLVENT RECYCLER, GENERATOR DETERMINATION FOR ' . . -
NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT WHEN SHIPPING RESTRICTED WASTES TO A STORAGE FACILITY
ON-SITE RECYCLING OF SPENT SOLVENTS BY GENERATORS . :
PERMIT ISSUES REGARDING ON-SITE TREATMENT BY FLUIDIZED BED INCINERATION : '
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO ON-SITE TREATMENT AND WASTEHATER TREATMENT UNIT EXEMPTIONS
PORT FACILITIES AS GENERATORS OF OILY WASTE I -
!RAW MATERIAL TRANSPORT VESSEL EXCLUSION FOR ALL WASTES GENERATED ON SUCH VESSELS
RECYCLING ACTIVITIES
REGULATION AND PERMITTING OF LABORATORIES :
REGULATORY STATUS OF SEPARATOR WATER AND EVAPORATOR UNITS AT DRY CLEANERS ! "
REQUIREMENTS FOR CHANGING STATUS OF A TANK FROM TSD TO GENERATOR ACCUMULATION " ' '
;; ;RESIDUES GENERATED FROM THE TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE, I.D. NUMBERS FOR
RESPONSIBILITY OF GENERATOR IN HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATIONS
;f ; SATELLITE ACCUMULATION - ' -" :": "
E .SOLAR CELL AND HIGH TECH INDUSTRIES HAZARDOUS WASTE
!s SOLVENT RECLAMATION OPERATIONS AT SEMICONDUCTOR FIRMS AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS • ' ' i. -
sj ;SPENT CARBON REGULATION . I : I \ i
: TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION AND ACCUMULATION PROVISIONS APPLICABILITY TO AN ASH TREATMENT FACILITY
I TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE FROM LARGE QUANTITY GENERATORS
•:_ TREATMENT RESIDUALS OF CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE AS A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE
~'\ VOLUNTARY CORRECTIVE ACTION • ;
'r;WASTE-AS-FUEL RULES AT DOD FACILITIES, IMPLEMENTATION " " " "* "' "-
- ;WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNITS ARE NOT DESIGNATED FACILITIES AND MAY NOT RECEIVE OFF-SITE HAZARDOUS WASTES ;
Accumulation ,
•ACCUMULATION TIME FOR EXCESS OF 5 5-GALLON LIMIT IN SATELLITE AREAS
•ACCUMULATION TIME FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE IMPORTERS • ;:
•ADDING ABSORBENT TO WASTE CONTAINERS ; :-
•CONTAINMENT BUILDINGS AS GENERATOR ACCUMULATION UNITS
•GENERATOR ACCUMULATION AND SECONDARY CONTAINMENT
•GENERATOR AT NAVAL VESSEL OPERATIONS
•GENERATOR SATELLITE ACCUMULATION/COUNTING REQUIREMENT
•GENERATOR STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO TRANSPORTERS I
•GENERATOR'S SATELLITE ACCUMULATION/COUNTING REQUIREMENTS
•HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS ' M :
:*INTERIM STATUS PART A APPLICATION WITHDRAWL I I; :
'•MULTIPLE GENERATOR LOCATION AND CONSOLIDATION • ' : ': r
^^fcOSE AND APPLICABILITY OF SPECULATIVE ACCUMULATION PROVISION
944X19a6(Sa>
94S1.19921D1)
9592^1934 (06)
9453,1988(03)
3443,1986(16)
9592.1994 (12)
9441.1992'(16)
9592.1994(03)
J3451iS,993s(02)1
,9441i.a992i(25)fi
9451!.i99Si(01):
:9S27;.1988;(03),:
i :1:945lU980;(02);?
;/9433»1985;(04):"
^9455i.l985i(01)i.:
9451^1986;(03)
:9432.1986,(05)-
9451.1980(01)
L9444:.1990:(02)-
19432.19B6;(13)1
9551.1987(20)
-9441.1986(21).
; :9522.198S(05)"
9522.1988(04)
9451.1986(02)
9441.1986(65)
9451.1989(01).
9441.1988(39)
9471.1993(01)
9453.1985(05)
9441.1986(05)
9451.1984(02)
9453.1989(07)
9444,1983(03)
9441.1986.189)
9441.1987(37)
9432.1987(10)
9453.1991(02)
9441.1988(44)
_9502.1987(11) _
9494.1986(02) '--
9452.1987(01) ;
9453.1990(03) I
9456.1992(01) M
9453.1990(02) ';
9453.1994(01)
9483.1986(10) E
19432. 1985 (02) \,
9453.1989(03)
9453.1989(01)
19453. 1989 (07a)
-9483.1986(07)
19453. 1991 (01)
.9441.1987(32^^
9441. 1995 (j^^k
06/30/86"
08/31/92
01/11/941
02/25/88
07/09/86
11/10/941
06/11/92
04/08/94
10/07/93
08/25/92:
08/22/95!
08/11/88
11/18/80:
10/23/85;
06/25/85!
04/28/86
02/05/86
12/02/80
03/22/90
08/06/86
10/28/87:
03/13/86
12/13/85
11/02/88
03/17/86
09/03/86
05/03/89
08/30/88
06/02/93
12/03/85
01/16/86
09/04/84
07/13/89
07/20/83:
12/02/86 '•
05/18/87
08/28/87
09/20/91 ;
10/27/88
12/21/87 :
03/19/86
02/24/87
10/01/90
08/31/92
07/30/90
09/30/94
11/30/86
05/30/85 ;
08/30/89
04/30/89
07/31/89 i
10/30/86
06/01/91 !
104/30/87
08/31/95
i --'-•:
^Af^A
•as.
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 45
•RELEASES FROM 90-DAY ACCUMULATION TANKS
•SATELLITE ACCUMULATION
• *SPECULATIVE ACCUMULATION CALCULATION
*SQG ACCUMULATION
*WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS
•WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT/GENERATOR ACCUMULATION TANK
ACCUMULATION AND TREATMENT OF WASTES ON-SITE/PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
ACCUMULATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN TANKS (90-DAY)
ACCUMULATION OF SECONDARY MATERIAL - ABANDONED VS. DISPOSED OF
APPLICABILITY OF PART 279 USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS TO THE OPERATION OF A VEHICLE FLEET SERVICING OPERATION
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA TO HAZARDOUS WASTES GENERATED IN PRODUCT STORAGE TANKS AND MANUFACTURING PROCESS UNITS
ATON BATTERIES, GENERATOR DEFINITION FOR
CLARIFICATION OF THE SATELLITE ACCUMULATION PROVISION FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATORS
DETERMINING GENERATOR STATUS BY INCLUDING WASTES COLLECTED AT SATELLITE ACCUMULATION AREAS
EVAPORATOR USED TO REMOVE WATER FROM HAZARDOUS WASTE
EXCLUSION FROM RCRA PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS FOR LESS THAN 90-DAY ACCUMULATORS OF DIOXIN CONTAINING WASTES
EXEMPTION FOR WASTEWATER DISCHARGES AND GENERATOR ACCUMULATION PROVISIONS
EXTENSION TO GENERATOR ACCUMULATION TIME LIMITS FOR UNFORESEEN, TEMPORARY CIRCUMSTANCES
FOUNDRY SANDS RECYCLED AND RETURNED TO THE FOUNDRY
GENERATOR ACCUMULATION TIME REQUIREMENTS
GENERATOR MANAGEMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE AND THE 90-DAY TREATMENT EXEMPTION
GENERATOR RECYCLING HAZARDOUS WASTE ON-SITE
GENERATOR WITH RESPECT TO REGULATION OF OPERATIONAL WASTES FROM SHIPS, DEFINITION
INCINERATOR RESIDUES/RECYCLING DEFINED/ACCUMULATION
LIABILITY AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR TRANSPORTATION AND DISPOSAL OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
MANAGEMENT OF WASTES PRIOR TO INTRODUCTION INTO SEWER
ON-SITE RECYCLING OF SPENT SOLVENTS BY GENERATORS
ON-SITE TREATMENT BY GENERATORS UNDER 262.34
ON-SITE TREATMENT EXEMPTION, REINTERPRETATION OF
PERMITTING OF TREATMENT ACTIVITIES IN A GENERATOR'S ACCUMULATION TANKS OR CONTAINERS
RECYCLABLE CLOTH WIPERS AND DISPOSABLE INDUSTRIAL WIPERS USED TO CLEAN UP HAZARDOUS WASTES
RECYCLING OF MOLDING AND CASTING SANDS
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR TANKS, VEHICLES, VESSELS, PROCESS OR MANUFACTURING UNITS, OR PIPELINES WHICH HAVE BEEN SHUT DOWN
RELEASES OF HAZARDOUS WASTE, RCRA APPLICABILITY TO
SATELLITE ACCUMULATION AREA AND REGULATIONS
SATELLITE ACCUMULATION PROVISION, CLARIFICATION
SOLVENT RECLAMATION OPERATIONS AT SEMICONDUCTOR FIRMS AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
SPENT SULFURIC ACID ACCUMULATED SPECULATIVELY
STILL BOTTOMS GENERATED AND REMOVED FROM A RECYCLING UNIT
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION AND ACCUMULATION PROVISIONS APPLICABILITY TO AN ASH TREATMENT FACILITY
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION APPLICABILITY TO A BAGHOUSE SYSTEM
TREATMENT IN ACCUMULATION TANKS AND CONTAINERS ALLOWED FOR ALL GENERATORS SUBJECT TO 262.34
TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN A GENERATOR'S ACCUMULATION TANKS AND CONTAINERS
TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN GENERATOR'S ACCUMULATION TANKS
USED OIL FILTERS, REGULATORY DETERMINATION
Biennial Reports
•AMENDMENTS TO PART 262 HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION AND RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS
•BIENNIAL REPORTING FOR WASTES TREATED IN EXEMPT UNITS
•RCRA WASTE MINIMIZATION REQUIREMENTS
BIENNIAL REPORTS
CLARIFICATION OF HOW MANIFEST AND BIENNIAL REPORTING APPLIES TO MIXTURES OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
STATE/REGIONAL BIENNIAL REPORTS
WASTE MINIMIZATION AND INCLUSION OF RECYCLING
WASTE MINIMIZATION AND INCLUSION OF RECYCLING
9453.1986(05)
9453.1985(06)
9441.1992(04)
9453.1986(02)
9453.1984(02)
9483.1988(15)
9453.1986(01)
9453.1982(01)
9441.1985(25)
9592.1994 (05)
9441.1995(09)
9453.1988(03)
9453.1993(01)
9451.1994 (01)
9432.1987(03)
9453.1985(02)
9441.1987(96)
9453.1987(05)
9441.1987(13)
9453.1989(05)
9451.1993(03)
9453.1987(04)
9432.1986(05)
9551.1989(06)
9451.1986(07)
9441.1986(73)
9441.1986(21)
9453.1987(03)
9453.1987(08)
9453.1986(04)
9441.1986(53)
9441.1986(01)
9441.1995(15)
9502.1987(05)
9453.1987(01)
9453.1989(08)
9441.1986(89)
9441.1988(19)
9453.1989(04)
9432.1987(10)
9432.1987(01)
9453.1986(07)
9453.1986(08)
9453.1987(02)
9442.1990(05)
08/30/86
12/30/85
02/28/92
04/30/86
05/30/84
07/30/88
04/16/86
08/31/82
07/01/85
06/10/94
03/08/95
02/25/88
02/23/93
02/10/94
05/01/87
03/12/85
12/10/87
08/12/87
03/04/87
04/21/89
11/01/93
07/14/87
02/05/86
05/03/89
03/24/86
09/25/86
03/13/86
07/01/87
12/15/87
07/25/86
07/03/86
01/06/86
04/20/95
04/02/87
02/22/87
08/02/89
12/02/86
05/26/88
04/18/89
08/28/87
03/17/87
12/05/86
12/22/86
03/25/87
10/30/90
9451
9454
9561
9454
9452
9454
9452
9452
1991(02)
1994(02)
1995(01)
1984(01)
1993(02)
,1986(05)
,1986(03)
,1986(03)
03/01/91
06/30/94
06/30/95
03/30/84
04/29/93
08/13/86
02/06/86
02/06/86
-------
07/02/96^ _ __
KEYWORD JNDSX
^ <
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No.
WASTE MINIMIZATION REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 3002 (b) OF RCRA FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES
Small Quantity Generator
*100-1000 Kg/MONTH GENERATORS
*CARBON FILTERS IN DRY CLEANING FOR FILTERING PERCHLOROETHYLENE
•CONTAINMENT BUILDINGS AS GENERATOR ACCUMULATION UNITS
*INTERIM STATUS AND SQG
'INTERIM STATUS FOR RECEIVING SQG WASTE
*LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - MANIFEST REQUIREMENTS
*LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS DEFINITIONS
'MANIFEST REQUIREMENTS FOR SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS
*PARTS WASHING WITH MINERAL SPIRITS, SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS
'PRECIOUS METAL RECYCLING (SILVER), SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR
'RCRA WASTE MINIMIZATION REQUIREMENTS
'SATELLITE ACCUMULATION STANDARDS FOR SQGs
'SMALL QUANTITY DETERMINATION FOR SOLVENT RECLAIMER
*SQG 100-1000 Kg/MONTH GENERATORS, AND THE MANIFEST
*SQG ACCUMULATION
*SQG QUANTITY DETERMINATION," MULTIPLE COUNTING EXEMPTION
'WASTE DERIVED FROM TREATING EXEMPT OR EXCLUDED WASTES
AIDS TO NAVIGATION (ATON) BATTERIES AND RCRA REQUIREMENTS
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA REGULATIONS REGARDING LARGE QUANTITY GENERATORS, TO THE VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER
COUNTING DRY CLEANING INDUSTRY WASTE ONLY AFTER REMOVAL FROM THE PROCESS - SQG RULE
DELISTING REGULATORY STANDARDS FOR FREON
DRY TOLUENE AND CARBON TETRACHLORIDE, SAFE DISPOSAL OF
EFFECTS OF THE SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR RULE ON VARIOUS GENERATOR WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
FREON TF RECOVERY STILL BOTTOMS
GENERATOR I.D. NUMBERS TO COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES, ASSIGNING
HAZARDOUS WASTE RECYCLING REGULATIONS TO A PROPOSED INK RECYCLING PROCESS
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION PROGRAMS, CERCLA AND RCRA LIABILITY OF MUNICIPAL SPONSORS OF
HOUSEHOLD WASTE EXCLUSION SCOPE
HSWA PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF HAZARDOUS WASTE AS A DUST SUPPRESSANT
LABORATORY WASTE EXCLUSION
LEAD-BASED PAINT RESIDUES AND CONTAMINATED SOILS
MERCURY DRY CELL BATTERIES AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
MODIFIED MANIFEST WASTE MINIMIZATION CERTIFICATION FOR SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS
OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION EXCLUSION
ON-SITE RECYCLING OF SPENT SOLVENTS BY GENERATORS
PAINT FILTER WASTE
PAINTING CONTRACTOR WASTES-SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR
PART B PERMIT APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR SQG TREATMENT FACILITIES
RAILROAD TIES AS HAZARDOUS WASTES UNDER THE MIXTURE RULE, SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR
RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS FOR SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS SUBJECT TO LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
RECYCLABLE CLOTH WIPERS AND DISPOSABLE INDUSTRIAL WIPERS USED TO CLEAN UP HAZARDOUS WASTES
REQUIREMENTS FOR DISPOSAL OF DISCHARGED M-44 CYANIDE CAPSULES THAT ORIGINALLY CONTAINED A SODIUM CYANIDE PESTICIDE
SCRAP AMALGAM FILLINGS FROM DENTISTS, DISPOSAL OF
SCRAP DENTAL AMALGAM
SMALL QUANTITIES OF WASTE GENERATED BY LARGE NUMBERS OF GENERATORS
SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR (SQG) REQUIREMENTS AND LIABILITIES
SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR APPLIES TO AGGREGATE AMOUNT OF WASTES GENERATED AT A FACILITY
SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR REGULATIONS APPLICABILITY TO LABORATORIES
SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR WASTE STREAMS - TANK RISK ANALYSIS
SQG COMPLIANCE WITH TC RULE
TC RULE RELATIONSHIP TO USED OIL FILTER DISPOSAL
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION AND ACCUMULATION PROVISIONS APPLICABILITY TO AN ASH TREATMENT FACILITY
TRANSPORTING WASTES FROM CONDITIONALLY EXEMPT SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS
TREATMENT IN ACCUMULATION TANKS AND CONTAINERS ALLOWED FOR ALL GENERATORS SUBJECT TO 262.34
9561.1994(01) 07/18/94
9451.1987(04)
9444.1984(05)
9453.1994 (01)
9521.1986(05a)
9528.1986(06)
9551.1988(04)
9551.1986(23)
9452.1985(01)
9441.1986(45)
9441.1985(283)
9561.1995(01)
9453.1990(01)
9441.1987(10)
9475.1985(02)
9453.1986(02)
9441.1986(64)
9441.1987(31)
9451.1987(03)
9441.1994(30)
9441.1986(67)
9433.1987(20)
9451.1986(06)
9451.1986(01)
9444.1981(04)
9451.1983(02)
9441.1993(14)
9441.1986(09)
9574.1991(01)
9493.00-1A
9441.1985(03)
9443.1987(28)
9443.1986(18)
9452.1986(02)
9441.1987(04)
9441.1986(21)
9444.1982(01)
9441.1986(47)
9522.1985(06)
9441.1980(04)
9454.1994(01)
9441.1986(53)
9442.1993(05)
9441.1989(22)
9441.1989(43)
9451.1987(02)
9451.1991(01)
9441.1980(05)
9441.1985(34)
9441.1986(25)
9441.1990(26)
9451.1991(03)
9432.1987(10)
9451.1993(01)
9453.1986(07)
08/30/87
04/30/84
09/30/94
05/30/86
07/30/86
05/30/88
12/30/86
06/30/85
05/30/86
07/30/85
06/30/95
04/30/90
02/28/87
10/30/85
04/30/86
08/30/86
04/30/87
07/30/87
11/23/94
09/08/86
09/03/87
12/15/86
03/17/86
06/22/81
09/30/83
09/01/93
01/28/86
05/30/91
05/31/86
07/31/85
11/20/87
09/04/86
10/20/86
01/13/87
03/13/86
09/15/82
06/02/86
12/28/85
11/17/80
05/09/94
07/03/86
12/23/93
05/17/89
08/17/89
02/18/87
03/13/91
11/17/80
10/31/85
03/26/86
09/20/90
04/16/91
08/28/87
09/20/93
12/05/86
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD IHDEX
Page Ho. 48 _
TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE JN PIPELINES LEADING TO! A HASTEHATER TREATMENT PLANT
USED AUTOMOBILE ANTIFREEZE DISPOSAL
: i HASTB MINIMIZATION CERTIFICATION REOUIREMBMTS , ::; . ; _ -
Universities , - _
hi GENERATOR I.D. NUMBERS TO COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES,!;ASSIGNING =
GEOLOGIC REPOSITORIES
, (See Subpart X, Land Disposal Facilities) ,;
GROURDWATER MONITORING
(See also Post-Closure) *
*APPENDIX VIII GROUNDWATER MONITORING I!
*HAZARDOUS HASTE TANKS AND GROUNDWATER MONITORfNG
*LABORATORY AUDIT INSPECTION ', ...... ^ -. . .
ANALYSIS OF APPENDIX IX CHEMICALS, PROPOSED - • ' ,
APPENDIX VIII CONSTITUENTS IN GROUNDWATER, REQUIREMENTS FOR ANALYSIS OF 1 :
CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE ISSUES FOR INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS •
CLOSURE PERFORMANCE STANDARD - '' "
COMBINED NRC-EPA SITING GUIDELINES FOR DISPOSAL OF COMMERCIAL MIXED LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE:AND HAZARDOUS iWASTE
CONOCO'S NO-MIGRATION PETITION DENIAL -
CONTAMINATED GROUND WATER AND VOLATILES FROM AIR STRIPPING, TREATMENT OF
CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER, REGULATORY STATUS OF ;
CORRECTIVE ACTION TECHNOLOGY, HQ SUPPORT
DELISTING PETITION, USE OF VHS MODEL ! '
DELISTING PETITIONS FOR K-WASTES MANAGED IN ON-SITE LAND-BASED UNITS-MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
DELISTING, INTERIM STATUS, AND SAMPLING ISSUES AT U.S. NAMEPLATE COMPANY
DRAINAGE WATER BENEATH LAND TREATMENT UNITS AT OIL REFINERIES
ENFORCING GROUNDWATER MONITORING REQUIREMENTS IN RCRA PART B PERMIT APPLICATIONS
F006 WASTES, VHS AND GROUNDWATER MONITORING DATA TO EVALUATE A DELISTING PETITION FOR
GC/MC RATHER THAN GC FOR GROUNDWATER MONITORING PURPOSES
GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION AS A BASIS TO DENY A DELISTING PETITION
GROUNDWATER MONITORING AT REGULATED UNITS NEAR SWMUs THAT HAVE IMPACTED GROUND WATER i
GROUNDWATER QUALITY AT CLOSURE !
GWM DATA IN PART B APPLICATIONS
K035 LISTING AND DELISTING ISSUES:GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION :
NEUTRALIZATION SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, GROUNDWATER MONITORING FOR CLOSURE OF INTERIM-STATUS ,
POST-CLOSURE PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS FOR NON-REGULATED UNITS 1
QUALIFICATIONS NECESSARY TO PERFORM ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION TASKS :
RCRA METHODS AND QA ACTIVITIES (NOTES)
SPENT CARBON USED TO REMOVE DISSOLVED PENTACHLOROPHENOL (PCP) FROM GROUNDWATER
SULFIDE REACTIVITY CHARACTERISTIC
SUMMARY OF ASSISTANCE BRANCH PERMITTING COMMENTS
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS i
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT CLOSURE, APPLICABILITY OF 3005 (i) OF RCRA TO
TIME OF TRAVEL METHOD FOR THE GUIDANCE CRITERIA FOR IDENTIFYING AREAS OF VULNERABLE HYDROGEOLOGY
VULNERABLE HYDROGEOLOGY GUIDANCE CRITERIA
Alternate Concentration Limit (ACL)
ACLs APPLIED TO SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT RETROFITTING PROVISION 3005 (j) (3)
ACLs PROPOSED BY UNION CARBIDE CORP., INSTITUTE, WV, COMMENTS ON ;
ACLs UNDER THE RCRA AND CERCLA PROGRAMS, USE OF
ALTERNATE CONCENTRATION LIMIT (ACL) POLICY FOR HSWA PROVISIONS I
GfiflUJIDWATER CLEANUP STANDARDS/ACLS IN DRAFT HSWA PERMIT (INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY)
RY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
9441,1986(62)
9442.1991(18)
9452,1986(01)
08/19/86
12/19/91
04/28/86
9451.1983(02) .09/30/83
XREF
XREF
9445.1987(01)!
9483.1986(04)!
9431.1987(03)'
9481.1986(02)
9481.1985(01)
9476.1987(08)!
9476.;00-13 r
9480.;00-14 i
9433.1990(04);
9441.1986(86)
9528.1987(02)
9502. 1986 (19),;
9433.!l985(05)«
9433.1987(21)
9433. 1987 (03)J;
9486. 1988 (01)Mi
9504 .1984 (01)
9433.1987(09)-
9481.1986(08)3
9433.1987(08):,
9481.,1987(05);i
9476 J1985 (02)1
9523.1984(07)
9433.1987(27);,
9484 .1986 (03)
9476jl985(04) =
9502;i994(01)r
9445.!1985(04)
9444.1986(05)
9443J1985(04)t
9523.00-17 !
9S23.;00-15 ::
9476.1987(01);!
9472.1986(06)
9481.1987(03)
9484.1987(08)
9481.1987(04)
9481.1986(06)
9481.1987(07)
9481.1987(02)
9523.00-14^^
/ /
03/30/87
08/30/86
07/30/87
07/25/86
10/15/85
12/17/87
02/08/88
03/13/87
09/24/90
11/20/86
03/11/87
10/07/86
11/27/85
09/28/87
02/25/87
01/02/88
08/16/84
06/08/87
09/26/86
04/24/87
06/17/87
08/27/85
09/10/84
12/11/87
04/09/86
09/25/85
09/14/94
06/30/85
03/03/86
07/16/85
09/02/88
03/30/88
06/09/87
07/08/86
06/03/87
07/14/87
06/19/87
08/06/86
07/24/87
03/10/87
i 03/14/86
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 49
Aquifer
'AQUIFER, DEFINITION OF SIGNIFICANT YIELD IN
AQUIFER AND UPPERMOST AQUIFER, DEFINITION OF
METAL, K061 WASTES IN SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT-DELISTING PETITION
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
UPPERMOST AQUIFER IN FILL, IDENTIFICATION OF
Assessment Monitoring
*GROUNDWATER MONITORING - ASSESSMENT MONITORING/CORRECTIVE ACTION AT CLOSED INTERIM STATUS FACILITIES
GWM DEFICIENCIES IN PART B'S, RESPONSES TO AND MECHANISMS TO PREVENT
Compliance Monitoring
*GROUNDWATER MONITORING
*GROUNDWATER MONITORING - COMPLIANCE PERIOD/POST-CLOSURE CARE PERIOD
*GROUNDWATER MONITORING RESAMPLING REQUIREMENTS
PHYSICAL COMPLIANCE IN GROUNDWATER MONITORING, DEFINITION
Groundwater Standards
*GROUNDWATER SAMPLE ANALYSIS
ACLs PROPOSED BY UNION CARBIDE CORP., INSTITUTE, WV, COMMENTS ON
ACLs UNDER THE RCRA AND CERCLA PROGRAMS, USE OF
ALTERNATE CONCENTRATION LIMIT (ACL) POLICY FOR HSWA PROVISIONS
GROUNDWATER CLEANUP STANDARDS/ACLs IN DRAFT HSWA PERMIT (INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY)
Hydrogeological Data
ACLs PROPOSED BY UNION CARBIDE CORP., INSTITUTE, WV, COMMENTS ON
DRAFT SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN FOR NH PLATING COMPANY
VULNERABILITY GUIDANCE
Monitoring
*COMPLIANCE TO DETECTION GROUNDWATER MONITORING, CHANGE FROM
*GROUNDWATER MONITORING
*GROUNDW'ATER MONITORING AT NEWLY REGULATED FACILITIES
*GROUNDWATER MONITORING FOR RADIONUCLIDES
*GROUNDWATER SAMPLE ANALYSIS
FIBER OPTICS FOR IN-SITU MONITORING
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR AMOCO REFINERY
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR ARCO PRODUCTS, WA
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR ATLANTIC REFINING & MARKETING, PA
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR KERR-MCGEE REFINING, OK
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR KOCH REFINING, TX
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR KOCH'S REFINING, TX
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR MARATHON PETROLEUM, IL
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR SHELL OIL, WA
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR SINCLAIR OIL, OK
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR STAR ENTERPRISE, DE
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR SUN REFINING, OK
Student's T Test
ANALYSIS OF RETESTING PROCEDURES PAPER
THERMAL TREATMENT UNITS, SCOPE OF SUBPART X
Unsaturated Zone Monitoring
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
9432.1984 (06)
9431.1984(01)
9433.1987(18)
9523.00-14
9481.1986(01)
9481.1988(02)
9504.1984 (02)
9481. 1985 (Ola)
9481.1988(03)
9481.1992(02)
9481.1985(04)
9481.1985(01b)
9481.1987(04)
9481.1986(06)
9481.1987(07)
9481.1987(02)
9481.1987(04)
9433.1990(06)
9481.1987(01)
9481.1985(06)
9481.1985(013)
9481.1992(01)
9481.1987(06)
9481.1985(01b)
9502.1987(09)
9551.1990(13)
9551.1990(08)
9551.1991(06)
9551.1991(05)
9551.1991(12)
9551.1991(01)
9551.1990(09)
9551.1990(11)
9551.1990(12)
9551.1990(10)
9551.1991(02)
9481.1991(01)
9489.1988(01)
11/30/84
09/10/84
08/07/87
03/14/86
05/15/86
04/30/88
11/29/84
02/25/85
04/30/88
06/30/92
10/30/85
04/30/85
06/19/87
08/06/86
07/24/87
03/10/87
06/19/87
11/27/90
02/25/87
12/30/85
02/25/85
04/30/92
06/30/87
04/30/85
09/03/87
11/08/90
10/24/90
04/22/91
02/05/91
12/10/91
01/03/91
11/06/90
11/07/90
11/08/90
11/07/90
01/17/91
10/16/91
05/18/88
9523.00-12
03/30/87
-------
ii [M
•'•-f-^f---* I--3- «»»™« •*!"" j--lf~T ->•
"igs!",A»»3?s!!;Ji « i : i i »;r
•ir- ^•"^=^'n 1= ^ i * = —^ ^= = •
*wjw*^5 t=- --« ^=-v^ -=i * - " > =^ i:- - *
«;! ;j ---:•}'«l Ji;^! «;f
,, INDEX __ ___
•• - > r ::••!• ; -
_
j:
VHS
COMBINATION'W SLUDGES FROM ALL ^IMPOUNDMENTS1 TO DETERMINE HASTE VOLUME 'FOR VIIS ANALYSIS
DELISTING ISSUES RELATING TO EPAj'S MOBILE INCINERATOR IV
: DBLISTIHG PETITION, USE OF VIIS MODEL ' • ' ':
DELISTING PETITIONS FOR K-HASTES MANAGED IN ON-SITE LAND-BASED UNITS-MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
DELISTING REGULATORY STANDARDS FOR FREON -g
DENIAL OF DELISTING PETITION BASED ON EXISTING GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION "°
DETECTION LIMIT REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION ON APPENDIX VIII COMPOUNDS FOR A DELISTING PETITION
F006 HASTES, VHS AND GROUNDWATER MONITORING DATA TO EVALUATE A DELISTING PETITION FOR
K103/K104 WASTE STREAMS - REIATIONSHIP OF CWA BAT, LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS, BOAT, AND DELISTING CRITERIA
RECONSIDERATION OF DELISTING DENIAL BASED ON USE OF VHS, TOTAL CHROMIUM STANDARD, AND MCL ' '
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT DELISTING PETITIONS, USE OF VHS MODEL
Well Construction '
/GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION
J *GROUNDWATER MONITORING: ESTABLISHING BACKGROUND VALUES '
GROUNDWATER STANDARDS
(See Groundwater Monitoring)
9433.1987(07)
.94jJ3,1986(20)
9433.1987X21)
I94t33,1987i(20:)(,
9433.1987(05)
9433,1986'(19)
9433.1987 (09:)
5433.19871(06)
"9433.1986(080
9433.1987-(25)
9481.1985(05)
9481.1986(04)
XREF
04/13/87
12/11/86
11/27/85
09/28/87
09/03/87
03/19/87
12/09/86
06/08/87
04/02/87
03/24/86
10/26/87
10/30/85
07/30/86
GUIDANCE
DEMONSTRATING EQUIVALENCE OF PART 265 CLEAN CLOSURE WITH PART 264 REQUIREMENTS
GUIDANCE FROM THE U.S. EPA ON THE CRUSHING OF MERCURY-CONTAINING LAMPS
GUIDANCE ON TRIAL BURN FAILURES
VARIANCES FROM CLASSIFICATION AS A SOLID WASTE UNDER 40 CFR 260.3Kb) FOR SPENT CATALYSTS
HAZARDOUS AND SOLID WASTE AMENDMENTS (HSWA)
(See also Corrective Action, Delisting, Joint Permitting under State Authorization,Land Disposal Restrictions,Leachate Collection)
*ENFORCEMENT USING 3008 (h) AUTHORITY AND 3013 ORDERS
•EXISTING PORTION, DEFINITION AND HSWA IMPACT
213 OF HSHA, REQUIREMENTS - PERMIT ISSUANCE AND CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE i
CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS AT FACILITIES HAVING DELISTING EXCLUSIONS REVOKED -
EXISTING UNITS UNDER HSWA-APPLICABILITY OF MTR TO EXPANSIONS
GROUNDWATER QUALITY AT CLOSURE
HSWA EFFECT ON STATE DELISTING DECISIONS
HSHA MINIMUM TECH REQUIREMENTS FOR LINERS AND LEACHATE COLLECTION SYSTEMS
IMMEDIATE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
INTERPRETATION OF 3005(j)(1)
NONHAZARDOUS LIQUID WASTEWATERS AND SLUDGES IN SANITARY LF UNDER RCRA AND HSWA, DISPOSAL OF
PARTIAL PERMITTING OF INCINERATOR UNIT (DOW)
RCRA PERMITS WITH HSHA CONDITIONS - JOINTLY ISSUED PERMITS
STAYING HSWA PERMIT CONDITIONS
TREATMENT SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, REGULATORY OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO WOOD PRESERVERS
WASTE MINIMIZATION: PERMIT CERTIFICATION AND JOINT PERMITTING
WASTES NEWLY REGULATED UNDER HSWA, MANAGEMENT OF
HSWA Provisions
*LINERS AND LEAK DETECTION SYSTEMS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE LANDFILLS, SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, AND WASTE PILES
AUTHORIZATION OF STATE PROGRAMS TO IMPLEMENT LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS PROGRAMS
EFFECT OF LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS ON PERMITS
HSWA AUTHORIZATION ISSUES - JOINT PERMITTING
INDUSTRIAL FURNACES BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTES AND THE RESIDUALS GENERATED (LOUISIANA REG)
AND INFORMAL DELISTINGS AND HSHA EFFECTS ON BOTH
XREF
:. 9476.00-18 :
i 9441.1995(21)
9498.1994(04)
9433.1994(02)
i) XREF . -
: 9502.1986(18),
, 9432.1985(05)
! fl 9522.1985(03)1;
:* 9476.1988(01)
- 9432.1985(04) i
1 9476.1985(02) i
i ; 9433.1985(02)
; -* 9480.1985(01)
3 9501.1984(01)
'-. 9484.1985(01)
-' 9574.1985(01)
9522.1985(04) '
9502.1987(06)
. 9521.1988(03);
: 9484.1987(12)
9560.1985(01)
9541.1985(05)
: 9484.1992(01)
t 9541.1986(13) M
''. 9551.1986(15) !!
( 9541.1985(09) ii
9494. 1987 (02L-1
>• 9433. 1986 d^l
/ /
05/12/89
06/05/95
07/05/94
11/15/94
, f
09/30/86
08/08/85
07/05/85 —
01/29/88
08/30/85
08/27/85
05/16/85
04/01/85
11/09/84 ~-
07/25/85
01/22/85
08/30/85
06/30/87
12/09/88
11/25/87
09/11/85
05/06/85
07/31/92 ^ ,;V
06/24/86 ! : y^i
09/15/86 : irX-: '
07/01/85 I !
04/15/87
WD5/27/86 '-"•*•? !
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No.
HAZARDOUS CONSTITUENTS
DELING SlON
KD35 LISTING AND DELISTING ISSUES : GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
OF 2.4,5-T AND SILVEX PESTICIDES
PETITION ADDRESSING HSWA REQUIREMENTS FOR ANALYZING FOR APPENDIX VIII COMPOUNDS
WASTES CONTAINING F001-F005 CONSTITUENTS
HAZARDOUS WASTE FUELS
(See also Burning and Blending, Used Oil)
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS AND STORAGE STANDARDS FOR MARKETERS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
BURNING AND BLENDING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE AND USED OIL FUELS
CEMENT KILN BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FUELS DURING INTERIM STATUS
FIRE TRAINING PITS, REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR
FOSSIL FUEL COMBUSTION WASTE EXCLUSION IN 261.4(b)(4), FUEL MIXTURES
INDUSTRIAL FURNACES BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTES AND THE RESIDUALS GENERATED
K051 SLUDGE RE-USED ON-SITE, EXEMPTION
MIXTURES OF WASTES AND LEGITIMATE BURNING FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
REGULATION OF FUEL BLENDING AND RELATED TREATMENT AND STORAGE ACTIVITIES
REGULATORY STATUS OF CEMENT PRODUCED USING HAZARDOUS WASTE FUELS
REGULATORY STATUS OF TREATMENT ASSOCIATED WITH FUEL-BLENDING ACTIVITIES
(LOUISIANA REG)
Fuel
•HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL
•HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL BROKERS
•HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL IN INCINERATORS
•HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL MARKETERS
•USE CONSTITUTING DISPOSAL, RESIDUES FROM FIRE TRAINING EXERCISES
BEVILL AMENDMENT APPLIED TO COAL GASIFICATION FACILITY
BOILERS AND INCINERATORS, DISTINCTION BETWEEN/INTEGRAL DESIGN STANDARD
BURNING CHARACTERISTIC OFF-SPECIFICATION PETROLEUM PRODUCTS FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
BURNING CAUSED OIL IN THE MARINE INDUSTRY AND USED OIL GENERATOR NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
BURNING OFF-SPECIFICATION USED OIL FUEL IN GREENHOUSES
BURNING USED OIL AND THE LEAD SPECIFICATION
BURNING USED OIL IN SPACE HEATERS, INDUSTRIAL FURNACES, AND BOILERS
BY-PRODUCT CRUDE OIL TANK BOTTOMS
COAL TAR DECANTER SLUDGE WASTE PILE (TOLEDO COKE)
ENFORCEMENT POLICY ON WASTE BURNING FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
HAZARDOUS WASTE HAS BEEN MIXED WITH USED OIL (lOOOppm total halogens) (REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION)
INTERIM STATUS QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS TO HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL STORAGE FACILITIES, APPLIED
LUBRICATING OIL AND JET FUELS USED TO PRODUCE PETROLEUM PRODUCTS
MARKETING OR BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL, NOTIFICATION OF
MIXING HAZARDOUS WASTE WITH USED OIL (REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION)
MIXTURES OF LISTED AND CHARACTERISTIC WASTES
NOTIFICATION BY BURNERS OF USED OIL WHO FIRST CLAIM THAT USED OIL MEETS SPECIFICATIONS
OFF-SPECIFICATION JET FUEL BURNED AS KEROSENE FUEL
RECYCLED GASOLINE/WATER AND FUEL OIL/WATER MIXTURES
SPENT SOLVENT RECOVERY, WASTE MANAGEMENT TAX
SULFUR RECOVERY FURNACES ARE INDUSTRIAL FURNACES SUBJECT TO THE WASTE-AS-FUEL RULES
TRANSFER FACILITY REGULATION INTERPRETATION
USED OIL AND OIL BEARING HAZARDOUS WASTE-DERIVED REFINERY PRODUCTS n™TMC,n
USED OIL CONTAMINATION THROUGH NORMAL USE OR MIXING WITH HAZARDOUS WASTES - RECYCLING DEFINED
USED OIL INTOODUCEDEINTOTREFINERY PROCESS UNDER HAZARDOUS WASTE DERIVED REF!NERY FUEL PRODUCTS EXEMPTION
XREF
9433.1987(26)
9433.1987(27)
9442.1986(08)
9433.1986(23)
9441.1988(05)
XREF
9494.1986(05)
9495.1985(03)
9528.1987(10)
9489.1987(02)
9441.1981(01)
9494.1987(02)
9494.1985(02)
9494.1987(03)
9521.1994(01)
9441.1993(22)
9494.1994(01)
9494.1986(03)
9454.1986(01)
9441.1986(87)
9453.1985(04)
9493.1985(04)
9441.1987(76)
9432.1986(02)
9441.1986(95)
9495.1986(09)
9495.1986(05)
9495.1986(28)
9495.1986(03)
9441.1986(37)
9441.1987(98)
9494.1986(06)
9495.1986(08)
9528.1986(10)
9494.1985(01)
9494.1986(01)
9495.1986(04)
9441.1987(68)
9495.1987(01)
9441.1986(19)
9441.1986(22)
9441.1986(41)
9432.1986(04)
9461.1990(02)
9495.1986(02)
9441.1984 (30)
9495.1986(21)
9441.1986(11)
/ /
10/28/87
12/11/87
08/21/86
12/30/86
02/22/88
/ ,
04/11/86
12/12/85
09/03/87
07/22/87
01/13/81
04/15/87
07/30/85
08/31/87
10/17/94
11/02/93
01/28/94
03/30/86
01/30/86
11/30/86
11/30/85
11/30/85
09/15/87
01/03/86
12/23/86
04/21/86
03/05/86
11/12/86
02/13/86
05/01/86
12/24/87
12/31/86
04/08/86
11/13/86
10/01/85
02/09/86
02/28/86
08/19/87
01/20/87
03/08/86
03/19/86
05/20/86
01/21/86
10/30/90
01/11/86
10/22/84
09/15/86
02/11/86
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page Wo. 32 _
WASTB-AS-FUBL RULES AT DOD FACILITIES, IMPLEMENTATION
HASTE-DERIVED FUELS AT IRON AND STEEL WILLS AS PRODUCTS OR WASTE FUELS, INFORMATION REQUIRED
, Waste-Derived Fuel ! :! Ss ! i , : .; _
HAZARDOUS WASTE'FUEL CADENCE PRODUCT 312, REGULATION OF1 '
MINIMUM HEAT CONTENT REQUIREMENTS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTES BURNED IN BIFs >
< ! MINIMUM HEAT CONTENT REQUIREMiENTS OF WASTE-DERIVED FUEL BLENDED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY!UN BIFs -
REGULATION OF OILY HAZARDOUS PETROLEUM REFINERY WASTE
HASTE ACID AS WASTEWATER CONDITIONER AND AS INGREDIENT IN FERTILIZER
WASTE-DERIVED FUELS BURNED IN CEMENT KILN, REGULATION OF - •
Waste-as-Fuel -. -.
*SHAM RECYCLING POLICY APPLIED TO CERTIFIED BIFs
BIF REGULATIONS EFFECTS ON INDUSTRIAL BOILER ~' ' ' i•-: -' i'
SHAM INCINERATION AND TREATMENT OF K048-K052 WASTES IN CEMENT KILNS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES
SPENT AND RECLAIMED SOLVENTS, BLENDING OF RECLAIMED XYLENE ; v, -:
SULFUR RECOVERY FURNACES ARE INDUSTRIAL FURNACES SUBJECT TO THE WASTE-AS-FUEL RULES
USE/REUSE EXCLUSION TO RED WATER (K047) FROM WHICH SODlUM SULFITE IS RECOVERED AND WHICH IS USED AS "A FUEL-
USED OIL DEFINITION APPLICABILITY TO OPEN-GEAR LUBRICANT
HAZARDOUS WASTE IDENTIFICATION
(See also Characteristic Hazardous Baste, Listed Hazardous Waste) '
*BURNING/BLENDING OF UNUSED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT (XYLENE) WITH USED OIL
*DRIP GAS EXCLUSION
*DYES USED IN INK FORMULATION (K086)
*EPINEPHRINE RESIDUE IN A SYRINGE IS NOT P042 , ;
*F006 SLUDGE FROM ACID WASTE MIXTURE
*FOSSIL FUEL COMBUSTION WASTE EXCLUSION -'-.
•GROUNDWATER "CONTAINED IN" POLICY
*HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL
•HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL BROKERS
•HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE EXCLUSION GENERATED BY CONTRACTORS
*REINJECTED GROUNDWATER RESULTING FROM CORRECTIVE ACTION TREATMENT :
*SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE, DEFINED FOR SPENT SULFURIC ACID
'SPECULATIVE ACCUMULATION CALCULATION
*SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS ^ : "•' ~ ,\ •' :." - °;- '^
•SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS ; / 1~ ;,.". :
•TREATABILITY STUDIES SAMPLE EXEMPTION :; : ' '. '- ~ T : ' :
•WASTE IDENTIFICATION l° ! : ; . ';: -':"." i
*WASTEWATER TREATMENT-UNITS: REGULATORY STATUS OF WASTE ...-;*_ !—^i.^^—-^... J;»i_
ANTARCTICA WASTE DISPOSAL PRACTICES rj " ,,;:;:' ^ ^2 • •'-'-: '•
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA USED OIL REGULATIONS TO USED OIL CONTAINED IN DISCARDED HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES " • ';
AUTOMOTIVE FLUIDS, REGULATION OF •. ; v: ..: > ! ,)
BUBBLER CANISTERS CONTAINING PHOSPHOROUS OXYCHLORIDE ARE NOT WASTE WHEN RETURNED TO THE UNITED STATES FROM JAPAN FOR REGENERATION
BYPRODUCT MATERIAL AND MIXED WASTE, AEA AND DOE INTERFACE , ;
CARBON REGENERATION FACILITIES ' " ;= ' '..
CARBON SCRUBBER WASTES IN WHICH PRODUCT MATERIALS ARE CAPTURED '
CAUSTIC RINSING METAL PARTS
CEMENT KILN DUST WASTE
CHLOROFLUOROCARBON RECYCLING " ' - • •-
CHLOROFLUOROCARBONS (CFCs) AS REFRIGERANTS, RECYCLING OF SPENT :
CHLOROFLUOROCARBONS (CFCs) FROM PRODUCTION OF FOAM PRODUCTS , ; , „ ' ['.
CLARIFICATION OF RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE REGULATIONS AS THEY APPLY TO CERTAIN SECONDARY MATERIALS = J » :! • -I
CLARIFICATION ON WHEN USED MERCURY RELAYS/SWITCHES BECOME SPENT
CLOSURE PERFORMANCE STANDARD
gRCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT P LISTING APPLIES ONLY TO UNUSED PRODUCT, NQjMCED RESIDUES - j
at
: ( I
"
9494.1986(02)
9441t198:6(08)
"94 94. 1986 (04)"
;!9498J1!994;(;02)-:
!;9498,!1;994I(!11);'
9493.1991(01)
9441.1986(80) "
9494. 1985(03) -
9488.1i99U05)
-9488 Ji:991 (03)
9494.:i991(02)
: 944 1.1:987 (24)
.9432.1986(04) :
:9441.i:987(42)
9441.1590(33) -
XREF ":
9442.:i:985(01) ;:
9441.1989(05) i
9441.1990(19) i-
9444.1994(10) :
9441.1987(11)
= 9441. 1986 (16) ;,
"9441. 1990 (13b):
•9494.1986(03) 1
9454.1986 (01) *
!;9441.P.990(09) 5
;9554.i991(03) f
19441.1986(17) i
59441.il992(04) !
:;9444.1986(14) •
9441.1989(55) «
'9441. 1989(56) '
::9441.1987(77a)*
nr9441.1992(18) t
:;9442.1989(04) ~
39592.1994(06) ;
9441.1987(14) '.
9456.1994(01)
;9441.1986(46) :
19441. 1986 (26) t
;19444.1987(15)
9444.1987(33) i
:9441.1988(36)
=9441.1988(32) '
;:9441.1989(40) L
,19441.1990(05) I
fi9441.1994(13) •
i:9441.1994(25) 1
'^476.00-13 "
9444.1986(2^^
03/19/86
01/24/86
04/11/8K
05/20/94!
ll/04/94!
01/08/91,
10/20/86
10/11/85
10/01/91
09/23/91
03/29/91;
04/15/87
01/21/86
06/09/87
11/30/90
f /
12/30/85
02/28/89:
06/30/90
12/31/94
02/28/87
02/28/86,
05/31/90'
03/30/86:
01/30/86
03/30/90
04/01/91
02/28/86
02/28/92
06/30/86
10/30/89
11/30/89
09/30/87
06/30/92
04/26/89
07/11/94
03/06/87
12/16/94
06/02/86
04/02/86
05/18/87
08/07/87
07/29/88
07/21/88
08/02/89
02/26/90
05/19/94
09/28/94
02/08/88
12/08/86
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 53
CONTAINERS USED TO HOLD LISTED CHEMOTHERAPY DRUGS
CORRECTED LISTING DESCRIPTION FOR K062
DEFINITION OF RCRA WASTE K050
DELISTING CRITERIA/LEACHATE LEVELS
DELISTING PETITION - FUJI PHOTO FILM WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE
DBLISTING PETITION, USE OF VHS MODEL
DELISTING TESTING REQUIREMENTS, CYANIDE AND OTHER WASTES, STEEL INDUSTRY
DEMILITARIZATION OF MUNITIONS ™,,r,r,..r,™t,
DEMONSTRATING EQUIVALENCE OF PART 265 CLEAN CLOSURE WITH PART 264 REQUIREMENTS
DENTAL AMALGAM DISPOSAL
DEPLETED MIXTURES OF ETHYLENE GLYCOL AND WATER FROM HEAT EXCHANGERS
DETERMINATION REGARDING THE REGULATORY STATUS OF A WASTE RECLAMATION SYSTEM
DIMETHYL BENZENE-LISTING CLARIFICATION
DONRCRl REQ™EN?S\fp™0TLSH^nLING, SHIPMENT AND DISPOSAL OF HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCE COMPONENTS,
DRY CLEANING AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES WASTE NOT EXCLUDED AS HOUSEHOLD WASTE
DRYCLEANING INDUSTRY WASTES
ECOSCENT A & ECOSCENT D
ELECTRIC UTILITY POLES
ELECTROCHEMICAL MACHINING WASTES AND THE SCOPE OF THE F006 LISTING
ELECTROLESS ZINC PLATING WASTE NOT IN F006 LISTING
EMPTY TANK CARS THAT CONTAINED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT
ENFORCEMENTFOFHAPPLICABL^RCRAMREGULATIONS AT FACILITIES WITH PENDING DELISTING PETITIONS
ENVIRONMENTAL MEDIA CONTAMINATED WITH RCRA-LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE
ETCHANTS USED TO MANUFACTURE COPPER SALTS
EXCLUSION FROM REGULATION FOR CHARACTERISTIC AND LISTED WASTES - LEACHATE LEVELS
EXEMPTION FOR WASTEWATER DISCHARGES AND GENERATOR ACCUMULATION PROVISIONS
F003 10% RULE AND ASSOCIATED REGULATIONS
F005 LISTING FOR PYRIDINE STILL BOTTOMS
F006 AND F019 ELECTROPLATING LISTIKGS
F006 LISTING AND DEFINITION OF CONVERSION COATING
F006 LISTING DOES NOT INCLUDE ZINC PHOSPHATING WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES
F006 LISTING FOR PICKLING AND ETCHING WASTES AND DELISTING ISSUES
F009 LISTING AND THE MIXTURE RULE TO ELECTROPLATING RINSEWATERS AND RESINS
F021 LISTING FOR SUBSTANCES CONTAINING CHLOROPHENOLIC COMPOUNDS
F027 LISTING - USED AND UNUSED FORMULATIONS IN WOOD PRESERVING
FLOATING PLASTIC BALLS USED TO CONTROL VAPORS FROM TANKS CONTAINING LISTED PRODUCT
GASEOUS EMISSIONS FROM LANDFILLS
GENERATOR USE OF TOTAL CONSTITUENT ANALYSIS IN LIEU OF THE EP OR TCLP TESTS
GENERATOR WITH RESPECT TO REGULATION OF OPERATIONAL WASTES FROM SHIPS, DEFINITION
GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATED WITH HAZARDOUS WASTE LEACHATE
HAZARDOUS WASTE RECYCLING REGULATIONS TO A PROPOSED INK RECYCLING PROCESS
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING ISSUES
IRON CAKE WASTE GENERATED DURING THE PRODUCTION OF METHYLDOPA
K035 LISTING AND INCLUSION OF SLUDGES FROM BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF CREOSOTE PRODUCTION WASTEWATERS
LABORATORY WASTES (INCLUDING CARCASSES, BEDDING, CAGES) CONTAINING DIOXIN
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS REGULATION OF CYANIDES
LUBRICATING OIL AND JET FUELS USED TO PRODUCE PETROLEUM PRODUCTS
MATERIALS CONTAMINATED WITH PESTICIDE PRODUCTS
MERCURY DRY CELL BATTERIES AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
METAL FINISHING SLUDGES
MIXED RADIOACTIVE HOSPITAL WASTES AND THE DOMESTIC SEWAGE EXCLUSION
MIXTURE OF CHARACTERISTIC WASTE AND LISTED WASTE, ASH FROM INCINERATION ,„„,„„.,„__
MIXTURES OF SOLID WASTE AND A WASTE LISTED SOLELY BECAUSE IT EXHIBITS A CHARACTERISTIC
MIXTURES OF WASTES AND LEGITIMATE BURNING FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
MOBILE SOLVENT RECYCLER, GENERATOR DETERMINATION FOR
9441.1987(45)
9444.1987(31a)
9444 .1994 (04)
9433.1986(01)
9433.1991(01)
9433.1985(05)
9433.1984(06)
9441.1987(03)
9476.00-18
9441.1989(31)
9441.1989(42)
9441.1994(29)
9444.1990(03)
9441.1990(01)
9441.1995(07)
9441.1986(32)
9444.1987(07)
9443.1988(04)
9441.1990(21)
9444.1987(03)
9444.1987(23)
9441.1985(41)
9441.1990(04)
9433.1987(14)
9441.1989(30)
9441.1986(82)
9441.1986(03)
9441.1987(96)
9444.1987(30)
9444.1987(53)
9444.1986(09)
9444.1987(09)
9444.1987(27)
9444.1987(55)
9444.1987(31)
9444.1987(42)
9444.1987(10)
9444.1986(25)
9487.1986(03)
9451.1986(03)
9432.1986(05)
9441.1986(83)
9441.1993(14)
9443.1993(01)
9443.1987(32)
9444.1987(52)
9444.1986(30)
9554.1991(01)
9494.1985(01)
9444.1987(40)
9443.1986(18)
9444.1988(01)
9441.1986(94)
9441.1985(32)
9441.1985(38)
9494.1987(03)
9432.1986(13)
06/16/8V
07/30/87
06/03/94
01/07/86
03/07/91
11/27/85
12/18/84
01/07/87
05/12/89
06/30/89
08/04/89
11/09/94
04/05/90
02/09/90
02/28/95
04/21/86
03/06/87
03/14/88
07/19/90
01/27/87
06/30/87
12/12/85
02/14/90
07/20/87
06/19/89
11/08/86
01/07/86
12/10/87
07/21/87
12/15/87
05/02/86
03/26/87
07/06/87
12/28/87
07/28/87
09/23/87
04/09/87
11/03/86
03/06/86
04/28/86
02/05/86
11/13/86
09/01/93
01/18/93
12/16/87
12/11/87
12/10/86
01/08/91
10/01/85
09/09/87
09/04/86
01/11/88
12/19/86
10/07/85
11/20/85
08/31/87
08/06/86
-------
!E a •! i ! MM! I i i!! ;*« i! !' ! ::'
j l||
| |t= a :i ^ i „":_? = * n- - - t ^ t.H i si ; = = =- -=; li ; ~! i ji ; ?r~s f = -? i :i~ii '=^sii r ii | = V n = i » =E * & = = if ~i r -- ii =5==?
! =
07/02/96 ------- -
Hi: • i r. T
us:; Minn i t i
- — =•• Page
S4
OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION BXCLUSIOW 1
-iPACKAGES CONTAINING RESIDUAL URETHAWE COATING CHEMICALS :'
DECHLORINATION TREATMENT PROCESS ;i! =*i i '
" PERSONAL PROTECTIVE GEAR DISPOSAL
jJiPESTICIDE APPLICATOR HASHING RINSE WATER ! ]! SIS ! : Z
"PETROLEUM FACILITIES INCLUDED IN THE K051 LISTING FOR API SEPARATOR SLUDGE
i- PRECIPITATION HHICII IS CORROSIVE DUE TO CONTACT WITH EXEMPT WASTES (COAL GASIFICATION ASH)
CRAGS AND SIMILAR MATERIALS ABSORBING VOLATILES AND F-HASTES, HANDLING
•RAW MATERIAL TRANSPORT VESSEL EXCLUSION FOR ALL WASTES GENERATED ON SUCH VESSELS
^REACTIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF DISCHARGED Li/S02 BATTERIES
f RECLAIMED METHANOL IS A PRODUCT RATHER THAN A WASTE
..RECYCLABLE CLOTH WIPERS AND DISPOSABLE INDUSTRIAL WIPERS USED TO CLEAN UP HAZARDOUS WASTES
^RECYCLED GASOLINE/WATER AND FUEL OIL/WATER MIXTURES
=• RECYCLED PRECIOUS METALS, BATTERIES FROM DEFENSE DEPT. SUPPLIES
JiRECYCLING EXCLUSION OF WASTES
RECYCLING OF MOLDING AND CASTING SANDS
"^REFRACTORY WASTES AT U.S. EPA COMBUSTION RESEARCH FACILITY " "
^REGULATIONS FOR DISPOSAL OF CERAMIC MATERIALS
^REGULATORY DETERMINATIONS UNDER RCRA ON THE STATUS OF ZINC OXIDE PRODUCED BY AN ELECTRIC ARC STEEL FURNACE
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR ON-SITE TREATMENT OF OXYGEN BREATHING APPARATUS (OBA) CANISTERS
((REGULATORY STATUS OF METAL CASINGS CONTAINING SPENT POWDERED METALLIC OXIDE CATALYST
"RELISTING HAZARDOUS WASTE
'.REQUIREMENTS OF A FACILITY GENERATING, STORING, AND MANIFESTING F001
^RESIDUES GENERATED FROM THE TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE, I.D. NUMBERS FOR
VRESIDUES REMAINING IN EMPTY CONTAINERS, BURNING OF
ViRESPONSE TO SPECIFIC QUESTIONS REGARDING HAZARDOUS WASTE IDENTIFICATION AND GENERATOR REGULATIONS
'RINSE WATERS CONTAINING TCE SOLVENT
^SCINTILLATION COCKTAIL, REGULATION OF LIQUID
^SCINTILLATION COUNTING COCKTAIL
•jSCRAP DENTAL AMALGAM
^SECONDARY MATERIAL SUBJECTED TO NOTICE REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE US-CANADIAN BILATERAL TREATY :
^SILVER RECOVERY IN THE PHOTOGRAPHIC INDUSTRY
5SOIL CONTAMINATED WITH USED AND UNUSED PESTICIDES
jjSOLVENT LISTINGS AND LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS i
(SOLVENT LISTINGS, SCOPE OF I
^SOLVENT/MIXTURE BLENDS
^SOLVENTS USED AS REACTANT AND SOLVENT WASTES GENERATED BY A PRODUCTION PROCESS
JSPENT ANTI- FREEZE COOLANT REGULATORY STATUS
:'SPENT FLUIDIZED BED MEDIA AND CHANGES UNDER INTERIM STATUS
^SPENT ION EXCHANGE RESINS AND FILTER AS HAZARDOUS WASTE " ^
vSPENT PICKLE LIQUOR, REUSE OF
^SPENT PIPELINE FILTER CARTRIDGES
5SPENT SULFURIC ACID PICKLE LIQUOR USED TO PRODUCE FERTILIZER
-STABILIZED WASTE PICKLE LIQUOR FROM STEEL/IRON INDUSTRY
JSTATUS OF FACILITY WHERE A TEMPORARY DELISTING EXCLUSION WAS NEVER GRANTED
JSTILL BOTTOM WASTE FROM POLYSTYRENE PRODUCTION
'STILL BOTTOMS FROM LISTED SOLVENT RECLAMATION
SUPERNATANT FROM TREATMENT OF SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR (K062)
.TEMPORARILY AND INFORMALLY DELISTED WASTES, REGULATORY STATUS
^TESTING OF USED FILTERS !
(TOLUENE AS A DILUANT OR CARRIER AND THE SCOPE OF THE F005 LISTING
1TRUCK OR RAIL SHIPMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TO A POTH
(USED X-RAY FILM AS A SPENT MATERIAL - SILVER RECLAMATION
jVEHICLE FILTERS CONTAMINATED WITH PESTICIDES i
"WASHWATERS GENERATED FROM WASHING PESTICIDE APPLICATOR TRUCKS '
FROM CHEMICAL ETCHING USING CYANIDE
9443. 1987 (Oil
9441,1987(04)
9443^1387(09!
94410.988(47)
9441. 1990 U5J
944U.98SI42)
9444 .1387 (20)
9441.1986(31)
9441.1989(50)
9441.1986(65)
9443.1987(05}
9441.1985(33)
., = ?9441.!1986i(53)'
* ' !9441.i986(22)
; "9441.a986'(85)
"; '9441.1990406)
i , J9441.il986.(01)
-9444. 1988 (05)
: ;9441.1992;(22)
- ^9444. 1994 :(09)
19441.1994(10)
: ; '9443.1994(01)
- ' ^9442.1986(08)
! ^9475.1986(013)
?9441.1986(05) .
'9441.1986(04) ".
' ;9452.1993(03);
9441.1987(59)
9443.1987(18)
9443.1987(04)
9441.1989(43)
9441.1989(29)
9441.1987(02) "
9444.1987(12)
9444.1987(18) !
9444.1986(26)
9444.1988(06)
9444.1986(27)
9441.1990(25)
9444.1986(28) I
9444.1987(13)
9441.1987(17)
9444.1988(03)
9493.1985(02)
9441.1990(16)
9433.1986(06) \f
9444.1987(38) !f
9444.1987(05) "
9444.1987(47) ""-
9433.1986(05) i .'
9441.1994(09) '_"_
9444.1987(36) !:
9441.1986(88) ;!
9441.1986(42) !z
9443.1987(16) H
9441.1986(4^^
9444. 1987 (^^^
04/08/87
01/13/87
05/13/87
11/07/88
06/14/90
12/13/85
05/26/87
04/21/8:6
10/20/83
09/03/86
03/18/87
10/23/85
07/03/86
03/19/86
11/19/86
03/19/90
01/06/86
03/11/88
07/21/92
12/19/94
05/09/94
01/03/94
08/21/86
10/30/86
01/16/86
01/07/86
10/20/93
08/07/87
08/19/87
03/11/87
08/17/89
06/15/89
01/06/87
04/18/87
05/20/87
11/07/86
03/31/88
12/05/86
08/24/90
12/05/86
05/05/87
03/31/87
02/11/88
11/14/85
06/19/90
03/10/86
09/01/87
02/02/87
10/23/87
02/24/86
04/12/94
08/17/87
11/30/86
05/20/86
08/13/87
05/30/86
05/20/87
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 55
WASTE FROM ELECTROLESS PLATING PROCESSES NOT COVERED UNDER REINTERPRETED F006 LISTING
WASTE LISTINGS F006 AND K062, SCOPE OF
WASTES FROM BRIGHT DIPPING UNDER THE REINTERPRETED F006 LISTING
WASTES FROM ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LABORATORY
WASTES FROM ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) ON CARBON STEEL EXCLUDED FROM F006
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE EXEMPTION FOR ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES CONTAINING METHANOL
WASTEWATERS EXCLUSION FROM THE DEFINITION OF F021 FOR PCP MANUFACTURE
Aerosol Cans
AEROSOL CAN PUNCTURING, CRUSHING, OR SHREDDING, NON-EMPTY
AEROSOL CANS, ON-SITE DEPRESSURIZATION OF
AEROSOL CANS, RCRA REGULATON OF
REGULATORY STATUS OF USED RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL AEROSOL CANS
REGULATORY STATUS OF WASTE AEROSOL CANS
9444
9444
9444
9444
9444
9441
9441
9444
,1987(51)
.1986(32)
1987(28)
,1987(34)
,1987(14)
,1986(29)
.1989(52)
,1987(39)
9442.1989(07)
9432.1988(04)
9432.1980(01)
9442.1993(02)
9442.1994(01)
12/04/87
12/12/86
07/13/87
08/07/87
05/08/87
04/09/86
10/06/89
09/02/87
09/12/89
09/30/88
12/30/80
10/07/93
01/04/94
Asbestos
ASBESTOS AS A HAZARDOUS WASTE
Ballast Fluid
BALLAST FLUID CLASSIFICATION
9444.1980(05)
9444.1984(07)
11/18/80
05/30/84
Batteries
*REGENERATION VERSUS RECLAMATION FOR SPENT LEAD-ACID BATTERIES
HOUSEHOLD WASTE EXCLUSION SCOPE
LEAD-ACID BATTERY IMPROPER DISPOSAL
MOVEMENT OF NICKEL CADMIUM BATTERIES FROM MEXICO TO JAPAN VIA THE UNITED STATES
PARTICLE SIZE REDUCTION PROCEDURE FOR TCLP SAMPLES OF DRY CELL BATTERIES
RECOVERED LEAD AND LEAD ALLOYS FROM BATTERIES
REGULATORY STATUS OF BATTERIES
THE STATUS OF UNUSED OFF-SPECIFICATION LEAD PLATES USED IN THE PRODUCTION OF LEAD-ACID AUTOMOTIVE BATTERIES
USED BATTERIES RETURNED FOR REGENERATION EXEMPTION
WASTE MANAGEMENT OPTIONS FOR ZINC-CARBON BATTERIES
WOULD REGENERATION EXEMPTION APPLY TO VARIOUS TYPES OF LOCATIONS AT WHICH LEAD-ACID BATTERIES ARE REGENERATED?
Carbon Filters
*CARBON FILTERS IN DRY CLEANING FOR FILTERING PERCHLOROETHYLENE
ACTIVATED CARBON CANISTERS SATURATED WITH SPENT SOLVENTS
ACTIVATED CARBON CANISTERS USED TO COLLECT SOLVENT VAPORS GENERATED DURING PAINT APPLICATION
CARBON REGENERATION UNITS - REGULATORY STATUS
ELECTROPLATING RINSEWATERS
Chemical Deodorants
DEODORANTS FOR PORTABLE TOILETS
FORMALDEHYDE-BASED TOILET DEODORANTS
Compressed Gas Cylinders
GASES VENTED FROM COMPRESSED CYLINDERS - TREATING OF FLUORINE AND OTHERS
Contained-In
CLARIFICATION OF THE RCRA "CONTAINED-IN" POLICY
EPA'S CURRENT CONTAINED-IN POLICY AS IT APPLIES TO ENVIRONMENTAL MEDIA THAT CONTAIN P- AND U-LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTES
REGULATORY STATUS OF CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER AND LIMITATIONS ON DISPOSAL AND REUSE
REGULATORY STATUS OF PERSONNEL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
Contaminated Groundwater
"CLASSIFICATION OF LEACHATE CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER
9497.1994(01)
9574.1991(01)
9497.1986(02)
9452.1993(01)
9442.1991(07)
9455.1991(03)
9441.1993(24)
9441.1995(31)
9497.1991(01)
9441.1993(09)
9441.1995(01)
9444.1984 (05)
9441.1986(54)
9444.1986(08)
9489.1991(04)
9442.1987(03)
9444.1984(08)
9441.1986(38)
9441.1984(36)
9441.1995(32)
9444.1995(01)
9441.1989(03)
9441.1989(02)
11/30/94
05/30/91
07/11/86
01/28/93
05/29/91
12/10/91
12/22/93
09/14/95
03/04/91
05/06/93
01/12/95
04/30/84
07/15/86
05/02/86
08/02/91
07/28/87
06/06/84
05/01/86
12/17/84
09/15/95
02/17/95
01/24/89
01/03/89
9554.1991(02) 01/01/91
-------
! i! M ISi!
l !l
B i"! li a- " « «T» -* !fi«l'« r* I **«"'•"•*" * -,r--~ 'f-V*V1 "':
:: i^h^ :f
«=-_ i ^*!i
f. fi A ; -~*t=
i _^:gs?^z j^i^gpjj ; [ g> -==°g.?i;jif^ -^jgjfc^;r ^^:;! :r =
M
!t»i,'V^"»-~-
=^i
i -ii"v IF - ' - i = -lis^ =ip, _TBr; f.: ^ Sri r f^f: - ty ,—=i, ^ ; I
! ';; h Jiis Si !!:,
I Mi jl i!HI Bi (I:
07/02/96
I I !!l M IP E B;
S !i ! i! II !| !f J!=
*e^*
_1
•GROUNOWATER "CONTAINED IH"1
"HAZARDOUS WASTE I.D. i »4J i ^^ i-r i
CLARIFICATION OF THE RCRA »CONTAINED,fIjN":PQLi;CYS rl!
; CLOSURE STANDARDS POE HAZARDOUS WASTEJlLASD TR!EATME8T|UN:
COHTAMINATED ENVIRONMENTAL MEDIA - SOtL AND GROUND HATER
CONTAMINATED GROUNDHATER, RCRA REGULATORY STATUS , BM "^isr:;!
DRAINAGE WATER BENEATH LAND TREATMENT UNITS - NO MIGRATION^PBTItlONS "" !3SiJai:Ji;
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR KOCH REFINING, TX .."!:
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR TEXACO, WA :. . ,
RCRA REGULATORY STATUS OF CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER *" '"*
REGULATORY STATUS OF CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER AND LIMITATIONS ON DISPOSAL AND, REUSE
SHELL OIL FACILITY - TC COMPLIANCE /
UNDERGROUND INJECTION WELLS USED IN HYDROCARBON RECOVERY
Contaminated Soil * '
•HAZARDOUS WASTE IDENTIFICATION
*LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS: SOILS AND DEBRIS FROM RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION a
'MULTISOURCE LEACHATE (F039) WASTE CODE AS IT APPLIES TO CONTAMINATION FROM SPILLS
•PETROLEUM CONTAMINATED MEDIA AND DEBRIS UNDER THE TC UST TEMPORARY DEFERAL
•SOIL CONTAMINATED WITH CHLORDANE
•SOLID WASTE DETERMINATION FOR SPILLED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS
•SOLVENT MIXTURE RULE APPLIED TO SPILL OF TOLUENE/BENZENE MIXTURE - CERCLA INTERFACE
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA REGULATIONS TO A PROPOSED FUMING/GASIFICATION UNIT
APPLICABILITY OF THE HOUSEHOLD WASTE EXCLUSION TO LEAD-CONTAMINATED SOIL
CLARIFICATION OF NEWLY LISTED WASTES AND HAZARDOUS DEBRIS
CLARIFICATION OF RCRA REGULATORY APPLICATION TO SOILS CONTAMINATED BY CEMENT KILN DUST
CLARIFICATION OF RCRA REGULATORY APPLICATION TO SOILS CONTAMINATED BY CEMENT KILN DUST
CLARIFICATION OF THE "CONTAINED-IN" POLICY
CLARIFICATION OF THE APPLICABILITY OF CERTAIN RCRA REQUIREMENTS TO COMMON EXCAVATION-TYPE ACTIVITIES
CLARIFICATION OF THE RCRA "CONTAINED-IN" POLICY
CONTAINED-IN POLICY
CONTAMINATED ENVIRONMENTAL MEDIA - SOIL AND GROUND WATER
CONTAMINATED SOIL AND DEBRIS TREATED REPLACEMENT UNDER A TREATABILITY VARIANCE
iENVIRONMENTAL MEDIA CONTAMINATED WITH RCRA-LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE
EXCAVATED CONSTRUCTION SOIL CONTAINING QUANTITIES OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
INTERIM SOIL CLEAN-UP LEVELS FOR LEAD AT SUPERFUND SITES
INTERPRETATION OF THE PHRASE "WHICH CAN BE REASONABLY EXPECTED TO BE PRESENT" FO]
K001, P093, AND U059 CONTAMINATED SOIL TREATMENT STANDARDS
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS CLARIFICATIONS
'LEACH TESTING PROCEDURE TO REMOVE LEAD-CONTAMINATED SOILS FROM RESIDENTIAL AREAS
LEACHING TESTS FOR EVALUATING SOILS CONTAMINATED WITH LEAD
LEAD-BASED PAINT RESIDUES AND CONTAMINATED SOILS
MOBILE TREATMENT UNITS QUALIFIED FOR INTERIM STATUS
REGULATORY STATUS OF SOILS CONTAMINATED FROM RELEASES OF COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS
SOIL CLEANUPS FOR LEAD - CLEANUP STANDARDS FOR CLEAN CLOSURE
SOIL CONTAMINATED WITH PESTICIDE
SOIL CONTAMINATED WITH TOLUENE
SOILS CONTAMINATED WITH CHLORDANE AND HEPTACHLOR DURING TREATMENT OF BUILDINGS FOR TERMITES
SOILS FROM MISSOURI DIOXIN SITES, WHETHER HAZARDOUS
USE OF PETROLEUM-CONTAMINATED SOILS AS AN INGREDIENT IN ASPHALT BATCHING
Creosote
CREOSOTE TREATED CROSS-TIES DISPOSAL
K035 LISTING AND DELISTING ISSUES:GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM WOOD PRESERVING PROCESSES USING CREOSOTE AND/OR PENTACHLOROPHENOL
WITH CREOSOTE, DISPOSAL OF
— _ :
-"'"-, ' -"--"'"-- ;.-• •' -
-- - - =-=---= -J-- =- - = -.=.- 'I .- ---=.---=.=3- -•-''..!* ., -. n*.A /3. «l_|
• 7 - --•••- ^ii-3- ! - v-_C -* 94:41,1990,(13b)
"p ~m94:41tl988(14)
"">- "3s" i:- , '" ' ; : ~; V- "^' "' '" ';f " :!I94!41J1995I(32)
1
: :~" ""-"" V """. >443«1989:(04)
~ .; ^ "r ?'" :" ^ ~ ;i: ^x^?"-^ "' — ^ i^ " ^ :9441 .'1989 (30)
.--...-- -.-"r: , ^ .,:! SJ9551.=1991(12)
> ' ^ '---"-. 9551.vl991(08)
''- • -"--""" :" " " *'"" " •" -" '•"'i "J%" " L9441.il986(84)
' ' : " i i ' i= = ^9441 .-1989=(03)
*: -'-- "-• "- "=•.-' »-9431.1991;(02)
~> ' r -" '-'• --"J" -"T " " " -"#";ri*; =" " "S9521J199K02)
- -- -X-— - -- s-- - - .= - -- ,- - - '-^_--^,.-~- - -- s —_ - 7- — __-_
.: 9441. 1990 (13c)
9S51.'1988;(14)
9444.199i;(06)
9441.il990:(31)
9444.:1985(01)
- 9441.11995(20)
E 9443.il985:(ll)
9431.1994i(02)
9441.1995 (08)
9554.!l992(01)
UST v 9441.il993i(ll)
UST' , 9441.1993(16)
9441.1994(04)
H-TYPE ACTIVITIES" 9441.1992:(16)
9441.11995(32)
~ 9441.51991(04)
9443.S.989l(04)
_9551.1990X05)
— — a^9441. t989 (30)
- .- 7 „ 1^9443.11985(01)
'- ' -: '" ----' -"J --V --~y ;9502.1990(01)
3IL THAT EXHTBITS^THE TOXICITY jCHARACTERJSTIiCt, ^519554.1995 (01)
. i - : i, 11^9554 .1990;(09)
; « ; -- \ 'f -flgssLjigB?^!)
r : — :4^E9431 -1989!(01)
•''.-- '- J: ^5g9443.Il987'(24)
I !": ^9443.Jl987(28)
i - I,:sa>9528.a991(02)
rs : ; -,"- "9441. 1992 (34)
s ^ i .: j ^9502 .,1989 (02)
'i '--"'-' '• '• '-- ': ;S9441.1987 (21)
v*9445.1985(01)
FERMITES :19441.1987(15)
.. - - r»9441.1984(01)
' * ' §1 " ' ' ' ™;9493.1991(02)
; j , :: , , : i
M s < : r**9441.a990(20)
f ,{ : I, i i :; 3irt9"33.|1987(27)
3NTACHLOROPHENOL " ' " } ;";9444 .1984 (04)
;i : ;; ; : • T'p*944i.!i986(]^B
-
v - ": *
~~, 5
05/311/90
04/30/88
09/15/95
05/02/91
05/23/89
12/26/84
01/21/88
06/19/89
12/10/91
05/29/91
11/13/86
01/24/89
05/09/91
08/30/91
05/31/90
12/30/88
11/01/91
10/01/90
02/28/85
05/31/95
11/30/85
11/15/94
03/07/95
11/05/92
06/30/93
09/15/93
03/22/94
06/11/92
09/15/95
03/26/91
05/23/89
10/09/90
06/19/89
02/21/85
05/07/90
06/14/95
08/13/90
01/20/87
06/26/89
11/05/87
11/20/87
02/27/91
10/15/92
05/25/89
04/08/87
04/05/85
03/11/87
01/06/84
06/20/91
07/03/90
12/11/87
04/26/84
k02/ll/86
i = l*|dii
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 57
WOOD TREATMENT CYLINDER CREOSOTE SUMPS
Definition
*BDAT FOR WASTEWATER
'ELECTROPLATING AND ELECTROLESS PLATING LISTINGS
*F001-F005 WASTEWATER DEFINITION
*OIL AND GAS EXCLUSION APPLICABILITY
ANTI-NEOPLASTIC AGENTS IN HOSPITAL WASTES, DISPOSAL OF
BERYLLIUM WASTE DUST
DOILERS USED IN GREENHOUSE OPERATIONS ARE INDUSTRIAL BOILERS
BY-PRODUCT VS. SCRAP METAL
HEAT RECOVERY UNIT AS A BOILER OR AN INCINERATOR
IGNITABILITY CHARACTERISTIC, DEFINITION OF UNDER STANDARD TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE
IGNITABILITY OR CORROSIVITY TESTING-LIQUID AND AQUEOUS DEFINITION
K062 LISTING APPLIES ONLY TO FACILITIES WITHIN THE IRON AND STEEL INDUSTRY
LISTING OF TF-1, AN ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER FLUSHING AGENT
MARINE DEBRIS IN WATERS, DISPOSAL OF
OFF-SPEC COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS AT BOTTLING FACILITY
POLICIES REGARDING SELF-CERTIFICATION OF NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE
REGULATORY INTERPRETATION REGARDING PESTICIDE APPLICATOR WASHING RINSE WATER
SHOOTING RANGES, APPLICABILITY OF RCRA TO
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNIT DEFINED FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION UNDER 3004 (u)
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR USED/REUSED IS NOT SOLID WASTE
STEAM-SPRAYING OF AN EMPTY TANK
STILL BOTTOM WASTE GENERATED BY A POLYSTYRENE PRODUCTION FACILITY
SUBMARINE REACTOR COMPARTMENTS - LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
THE REGULATORY STATUS OF A DISTILLATE MATERIAL KNOWN AS "LX-830" THAT IS DERIVED FROM PETROLEUM AND COAL TAR NAPHTHA FEEDSTOCKS
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION APPLICABILITY TO A BAGHOUSE SYSTEM »«™IHA tt.bUfaluc.KS,
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION FOR SCRAP METAL RECYCLER
USED OIL AND IDENTIFICATION OF LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE
USED OIL DEFINITION TO OPEN-GEAR LUBRICANT "GEARITE"
ZINC OXIDE DUST RECLAIMED OR USED AS FERTILIZER
Dibutyltin Difluoride
DIBUTYLTIN DIFLUORIDE NOT A LISTED RCRA WASTE
Dredged Sediments
DREDGE SEDIMENTS
LEAKS, SPILLS, AND ILLEGAL DISCHARGES OF LISTED WASTES TO SURFACE WATERS, MIXTURE RULE APPLIED TO
Electric Arc Furnace
*K061 WASTE
ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE DUST AFTER ENCAPSULATION TREATMENT PROCESS
EXCLUSIONS FOR K-WASTES DENIED (LACLEDE STEEL)
MINING WASTE EXCLUSION FOR A FERROALLOY FACILITY
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY PRODUCTION OF STEEL IN ELECTRIC ARC FURNACES
RECYCLING OF ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE DUST
RECYCLING OF K061 AS AN INGREDIENT IN CEMENT
STAINLESS STEEL PRODUCTION RESIDUES
STATUS OF ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE DUST INCORPORATED INTO GLASS FRIT
F-Wastes
*F001-F005 WASTEWATER DEFINITION
*LAND DISPOSAL BAN - TRACES OF NATURALLY OCCURRING BENZENE AND TOLUENE
CADMIUM WASTES FROM MILITARY COATING MATERIALS
CHEMICAL ETCHING PROCESS-HAZARDOUS WASTE IDENTIFICATION
CLARIFICATION OF F006/F019 INTERPRETIVE LETTER REGARDING WASTES GENERATED FROM AN ALUMINUM COATING PROCESS
9441,1986(69) 09/12/86
9432.1986(16)
9432.1989(01)
9441.1990(18)
9441.1988(42)
9442.1986(02)
9434.1989(01)
9432.1986(03)
9441.1990(07)
9432.1985(08)
9443.1988(08)
9432.1990(01)
9444.1987(08)
9442.1986(04)
9432.1987(12a)
9441.1989(49)
9442.1995(02)
9441.1992(43)
9441.1988(41)
9502.1987(07)
9441.1986(61)
9441.1990(10)
9432.1988(01)
9554.1990(07)
9441.1995(02)
9432.1987(01)
9432.00-1
9495.1990(01)
9441.1990(27)
9441.1987(61)
9441.1984(27)
9443.1989(08)
9441.1986(07)
9444. 1989 (02b)
9444.1986(33)
9441.1989(48)
9441.1986(48)
9444.1986(02)
9441.1988(27)
9441.1990(03)
9441.1988(07)
9441.1992(42)
9441.1990(18)
9553.1986(02)
9441.1990(11)
9441.1990(14)
9442.1995(03)
12/30/86
08/30/89
06/30/90
09/30/88
01/30/86
03/17/89
01/09/86
03/30/90
11/20/85
09/09/88
02/16/90
03/16/87
05/06/86
11/04/87
09/28/89
02/07/95
12/15/92
09/06/88
07/24/87
08/18/86
04/10/90
02/11/88
07/30/90
01/31/95
03/17/87
02/11/86
06/13/90
11/30/90
08/12/87
09/20/84
08/11/89
01/23/86
03/31/89
12/29/86
09/12/89
06/10/86
01/27/86
06/15/88
02/13/90
03/10/88
12/01/92
06/30/90
04/30/86
04/12/90
06/12/90
02/27/95
-------
I! !!!!! !I!S
i! '.tf "'- "'•• -HI *:; •&'*'!
:
07/02/96 —
KEYWORD t»BX
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS HASTE IDENTIFICATION REQOIRBHEHTS FOR ORGANIC HAZARDOUS WASTES, ,
REGULATORY STATUS OF RECLAIMED SOLVENT FROM USED DRY CLEANING FILTERS
s REGULATORY STATUS OF (VARIOUS TYPES OF PENTACHLOROPHENOL HASTES .,,.,,„,„ 14HC
REGULATORY STATUS OF ^ASTEWATBR TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ZIRCONIUM PHOSPHATIBG OF ALUMINUM CANS
USED OIL AND IDENTIFICATION OF LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE
= HASTE TREATMENT FACILITIES ACCEPTING F006 ELECTROPLATING WASTES
ZIRCONIUM PHOSPHATING SLUDGES EXEMPTION
^COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS USED IN AIR BAGS - EFFECT ON RECYCLE OF FERROUS SCRAP FROM AUTOMOBILES
FLUFF RESIDUALS FROM FERROUS METALS RECYCLING (AUTOMOBILE SHREDDING)
Food Processing Waste
FOOD PROCESSING WASTE NOT UNDER AGRICULTURAL WASTE EXCLUSION
FOOD PROCESSORS, IMPACT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE REGULATIONS ON
Formaldehyde
BALLAST FLUID CLASSIFICATION
DEODORANTS FOR PORTABLE TOILETS
DISCARDED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS
EMBALMING FLUIDS, USED . .
ADDRESSING HSWA REQUIREMENTS FOR ANALYZING FOR APPENDIX VIII COMPOUNDS;
Freon
CHARACTERISTIC OF IGNITABILITY
DELISTING REGULATORY STANDARDS FOR FREON
FREON TF RECOVERY STILL BOTTOMS
USED REFRIGERANTS UNDER 40 CFR 261.2
High Tech Wastes
SOLAR CELL AND HIGH TECH INDUSTRIES HAZARDOUS WASTE
Iron Sponge
OIL AND GAS EXEMPTION IN 3001 (b) (2) (A) OF RCRA: IRON SPONGE PROCESS
SPENT IRON SPONGE REGULATION AND TREATMENT
Manufacturing Process Units
*MANUFACTURING PROCESS UNITS
* PARTS WASHING WITH MINERAL SPIRITS, SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS _ . . . . . . „„_„
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA TO HAZARDOUS WASTES GENERATED IN PRODUCT STORAGE TANKS AND MANUFACTURING PROCESS UNITS
CHARACTERIZATION OF WASTE STREAMS FROM POLYMERIC COATING OPERATIONS
KHUUuvivmi KBUU^-™-!, — «-»». VEHICLES, VESSELS, PROCESS OR MANUFACTURING UNITS, OR PIPELINES WHICH HAVE BEEN SHUT DOWN
REGULATORY STATUS OF A GASIFICATION UNIT PROPOSED BY TEXACO TO BE BUILT IN EL DORADO, KANSAS
WASTES GENERATED IN MANUFACTURING PROCESS UNIT NOT SUBJECT TO LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS UNTIL REMOVED s •
Mercury
ALLOWABLE HOLDING TIMES WHEN TESTING RCRA SAMPLES
CLASSIFICATION OF A MERCURY RECOVERY UNIT 5
CLASSIFICATION OF OLIN MERCURY RECOVERY UNIT AS AN INDUSTRIAL FURNACE ;
DETERMINATION ON WHETHER A GENERATOR'S FLUORESCENT TUBES ARE NONHAZARDOUS --
FLUORESCENT AND MERCURY VAPOR LAMPS AND CLASSIFICATION USING THE EP TOXICITY TEST * j
FREE-FLOWING MERCURY WHICH IS DISTILLED AND SOLD AS AN INGREDIENT IN AN INDUSTRIAL PROCESS ;
GUIDANCE FROM THE U.S. EPA ON THE CRUSHING OF MERCURY-CONTAINING LAMPS 1 !i B
PRETATION ON REGULATORY STATUS OF MERCURY RELAYS AND SWITCHES WHEN RECLAIMED
kY SUITABLE FOR DIRECT USE (99% PURE) NOT SOLID WASTE
N RECLA]
9551 ^6994 (02)
944t,li992(ll)
94<14ljli9817(!29)>:
9442ijll98;9(!01)!!
9495,1990(01)
9554 -,1988(05)::
9444 ."1990 (04)'
9441.1985(02)
9441.1988(48)'
944i;i980(02)'
9443<1980(02)
9444J1984(07)"
9444.1984(08);
9444.1985(05)
9444.1985(07),
9441.1986(38)
9433.1986(23):
9443.1987(07)
' 9433.1987(20)"
9444.1981(04)
9441.1990(28)*
9444.1983(03):
9441.1983(03);
9443.1986(02)!
9441.1987(71)
9441.1986(45),
9441.1995(09)'
9442.1995(01)
9432.1984(03)
9441.1995(15)
9441.1995(18)
, 9441.1987(53)
9445.1987(04)
: 9498.1994(03)
9498.1993(04)
9441.1995(23)
9443.1986(09)
9441.1994(08)
9441.1995(21)
9444.1994(03)
9441. 1986 (jM
12705/94
05/28/92
06/19/87 :
i 01/01/89 1
06/13/90
08/11/88 f
' 05/02/90 !
01/16/85
11/21/88 :
08/19/80
09/16/80
05/30/84 :
06/06/84
05/14/85
05/17/85
05/01/86
12/30/86 *
04/16/87 i
09/03/87
06/22/81
10/18/90 i:
07/20/83 *
05/25/83 I
01/17/86 i
08/30/87 •;_
OS/30/86 ':
" 03708/95 T-
01/26/95 *
04/26/84
04/20/95 ,
05/25/95
06/29/87 ,
12/04/87
05/26/94
12/17/93 '
06/22/95 :
04/30/86 J
03/30/94 i
06/05/95 J
' 03/31/94 '
k 05/30/861
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 59
MERCURY THERMOMETERS, RECLAIMED OFF-SPEC AND BROKEN
MERCURY, REFINING/REUSE OF SCRAP
NATIONAL CAPACITY VARIANCE FOR INORGANIC SOLIDS DEBRIS
REGULATORY INTERPRETATION OF A MOBILE MERCURY RETORTING PROCESS FOR MERCURY CONTAMINATED SOILS FROM NATURAL GAS PIPELINE METERS
REGULATORY STATUS OF MERCURY BATTERIES
REGULATORY STATUS OF NATURAL GAS REGULATORS THAT CONTAIN MERCURY UNDER RCRA
SCRAP AMALGAM FILLINGS FROM DENTISTS, DISPOSAL OF
TREATMENT STANDARD FOR K106 (LOW MERCURY SUBCATEGORY) NON-WASTEWATER RESIDUES FROM RETORTING/ROASTING (RMERC) UNITS
WASTE LISTINGS FOR COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS - MERCURY
Metals
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA SUBTITLE C REGULATIONS TO SILVER RECLAMATION OPERATIONS OF SPENT PHOTOGRAPHIC FIXER SOLUTIONS
APPLICATION OF THE SCRAP METAL EXEMPTION TO LEAD FOIL USED IN DENTAL X-RAY PACKAGES
CERTIFICATION/NOTIFICATION FOR MULTIPLE-CONSTITUENT WASTES SUBJECT TO LDRs
COPPER PLATING SOLUTION
ELECTROPLATING WASTES
FLUE DUST AND METAL HYDROXIDE SLUDGE RECYCLING/RECLAMATION
METAL, K061 WASTES IN SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT-DELISTING PETITION
RCRA POLICY STATEMENT: LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS' DILUTION PROHIBITION AND COMBUSTION OF INORGANIC METAL-BEARING HAZARDOUS WASTES
REGULATORY STATUS OF SOLDER DRIPPINGS GENERATED DURING RADIATOR REPAIR OPERATIONS
WOOD PRESERVING AND SURFACE PROTECTION FACILITIES, CONTROLLING ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES FROM
Munitions
*UNDETONATED EXPOSIVES, DISPOSAL OF OFF-SPECIFICATION
CLARIFICATION OF DISCARDED AMMUNITION OF 0.50 CALIBER
LEAD CONTAMINATION RESULTING FROM SKEET SHOOTING
MUNITIONS REGULATED AS HAZARDOUS WASTES
TCLP PARTICLE SIZE REDUCTION EXEMPTION FOR MUNITIONS
Oily Waste
*EP TOXICITY FOR OILY WASTES
*EP TOXICITY TEST ON OILY WASTES
*USED OIL FOR DUST SUPPRESSION/ROAD TREATMENT
BY-PRODUCT CRUDE OIL TANK BOTTOMS
CLARIFICATION OF THE RECYCLED USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS
DISPOSAL OF RAGS TO WIPE CRUDE OIL
EXCLUSION FROM REGULATION FOR CHARACTERISTIC AND LISTED WASTES - LEACHATE LEVELS
METHODS 1310 AND 1330: EXTRACTION PROCEDURE AND EXTRACTION PROCEDURE FOR OILY WASTE
MINING WASTES FROM SEARLES LAKE OPERATIONS
OILY WASTEWATER TREATMENT PONDS, PERMITTING COVERAGE OF
REGULATION OF OILY HAZARDOUS PETROLEUM REFINERY WASTE
REGULATORY STATUS AND MANAGEMENT OF DISPOSABLE AND LAUNDERABLE INDUSTRIAL RAGS AND WIPERS
REGULATORY STATUS OF AND PROPER DISPOSAL METHODS FOR HYDRAULIC FLUID FILTERS USED IN AIRCRAFTS
SAMPLING PLAN FOR DELISTING PETITION ADDRESSING HSWA REQUIREMENTS FOR ANALYZING FOR APPENDIX VIII COMPOUNDS
SQG COMPLIANCE WITH TC RULE
TCLP EXTRACTIONS AS THEY APPLY TO OILY WASTE
USED OIL FILTERS CLASSIFICATION
Paint Waste
LEAD PAINT REMOVAL DEBRIS AND THE TCLP PROCEDURE
LEADED PAINT SANDBLASTING WASTE TESTING USING TCLP
PAINT FILTER WASTE
PAINT FILTERS, USED
PAINT RESIDUES ON CONVEYOR HOOKS
PAINT SPRAY BOOTH AIR FILTERS
PAINT WASTES AND THE SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS
PAINT WASTES AS HAZARDOUS WASTES, RECYCLED/REUSED PAINT WASTES
9441.1986(27)
9441.1986(06)
9551.1990(07)
9498.1993(03)
9443.1994,102)
9442.1994(06)
9441.1989(22)
9554.1994(04)
9441.1988(45)
9496.1994(01)
9441.1993(05)
9551.1991(10)
9443.1986(04)
9441.1991(06)
9441.1989(10)
9433.1987(18)
9551.01-01
9441.1993(07)
9441.1986(28)
9441.1984(28)
9443.1994(06)
9444.1993(04)
9441.1990(23)
9442.1991(16)
9443.1985(08)
9443.1984(04)
9441.1990(08)
9441.1986(37)
9592.1993(06)
9441.1989(23)
9441.1986(03)
9443.1987(14)
9441.1993(12)
9502.1984(01)
9493.1991(01)
9441.1993(19)
9444.1994(01)
9433.1986(23)
9441.1990(26)
9442.1991(08)
9441.1990(22)
9442.1991(12)
9442.1991(01)
9444.1982(01)
9444.1988(13)
9443.1980(03)
9442.1990(01)
9444.1987(17)
9441.1981(03)
04/02/86
01/21/86
10/14/90
11/29/93
02/04/94
07/29/94
05/17/89
07/14/94
11/02/88
02/28/94
04/29/93
06/05/91
01/22/86
05/29/91
03/27/89
08/07/87
05/23/94
04/29/93
04/07/86
08/31/84
11/03/94
09/23/93
08/21/90
05/01/91
09/30/85
07/30/84
03/30/90
05/01/86
10/07/93
05/31/89
01/07/86
08/11/87
06/30/93
12/07/84
01/08/91
09/27/93
01/12/94
12/30/86
09/20/90
06/13/91
08/17/90
08/30/91
01/08/91
09/15/82
07/28/88
12/20/80
05/03/90
05/20/87
04/06/81
-------
•"!•;• >'Ht»i! i v» i i
i Mr ; BMI
f -:^-r - - - - = - j:-=- -- -= = s.-- :;---.- =- jf _--,— =-- ,_ . _-_^ - i 5 5 -^s? _- = -- - i = ,|=. _i: - =
s ' >.'.'-- •*- !:S ;! a a: • •- ' ',1 •- a Wi i; !'• :
8 i! M ! ijliji 11 i|| ! ij |i;
SHI
•
!: • ::M
07/02/96
KBYHORD IHOEX
I I
|[ j
4 ^PAINTING iCWrRACTORHHASTBS^SMALti Q0MJTITY GENERATOR
"/PAIHTS CONTAINING SOLVENTS-
",,,PROCESS HASTES CONTAINING INKS, ,PAIHTS, AND ADHESIVES
: .StTCLP AND LEAD PAINT REMOVAL' DEBRIS I : _ _ = _^ -^__
"^WASTES FROM ELECTROSTATIC WATERFALL CURTAIN PAINTING OPERATIONS '
Phosphate Hastes i! — _ - _ ~
PHOSPHATE AND GAS PROCESSING INDUSTRY HASTES ; - . . .
Process Wastes , ~. ....-,'. , i" _ .'.-.. ,
•HAZARDOUS HASTE DETERMINATION - - -..." ' L . u ."-, rf.-.' :.,i. A! . - ., "- -,
•MANUFACTURING PROCESS UNITS ; := . "" •. V; " / --T -"" '',' ^L ' \^ ' '.
•NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR RECYCLABLE MATERIALS
•POINT OF GENERATION - LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS , :: , -:';^; • : if'.'r * ^= ; ="--- '.i ^i ^A !.• -
•SOLID WASTE VARIANCE FOR SPENT SOLVENT i : /;_; ~ ~.' :; .' " ^": """ '"
•SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS ! " ' , J4-.':," .: "B". _, ;j : •'-'-,: "-*.:-
•WASTES GENERATED IN PROCESS UNITS •" -"","." = ,
ACID PLANT SLOWDOWN SLURRY/SLUDGE FROM PRIMARY COPPER PRODUCTION ; , ,.-.--* • -- r -"-.--. .-- --.".*. -----., - -----:
APPLICABILITY OF HAZARDOUS WASTE CODES TO A CHEMICAL POLISHING SYSTEM '---, ] -- :v : ' A
ASBESTOS AS A HAZARDOUS WASTE '-- '' ' V , 1 " ' -"-?.'- ",: -:-'"". - :» ,
CARBAMATE LISTING DETERMINATION (60 PR 7824, FEBRUARY 9, 1995) AS IT RELATES TO THE LATEX\ PROCESS WASTES GENERATED BY :A-COMPANY
CARBON REGENERATION FACILITY, MIXTURE OF SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTES (CALGON) : -j ." ';
CHLORIDE-ILMENITE PROCESS WASTES ;; '• - ~>
CHROMIUM WASTES, EXCLUSION FOR CERTAIN •'.-'-
CHROMIUM WASTES: TRIVALENT AND HEXAVALENT, CHROMIUM IN TANNERY WASTES
CLARIFICATION OF F006/F019 INTERPRETIVE LETTER REGARDING WASTES GENERATED FROM AN ALUMINUM COATING PROCESS
CLARIFICATION OF THE RECYCLED USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS "-. ::-
CLARIFICATION ON THE USE OF SOLVENTS AS REACTANTS IN MANUFACTURING PROCESSES
COLORED GLAZE SOLIDS COLLECTED IN POTTERY MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS '.
DEIONIZATION ACID REUSED, NOT A WASTE . : I
F019 LISTING AND THE CONVERSION COATING PROCESS .- I- .
FILTER CAKE WASTE CONTAINING SOLVENT USED TO SOLUBILIZE PRODUCT - s
FILTER PRESS PROPOSED AS PART OF CORRECTIVE ACTION - NOT EXCLUDED FROM PERMITTING ; -.
INK FORMULATION WASTES AS BOTH K086 AND F001-005 WASTES 5
LIME STABILIZED WASTE PICKLE LIQUOR SLUDGE EXCLUSION ; ; ,;
METHANOL RECOVERY SYSTEM - CLARIFICATION OF WASTE STATUS ! : J 3
PRE-COAT WASTE CONTAINING 2-ETHOXYETHANOL (EXTRUDING PROCESS WASTE) : "I *
PROCESS WASTES CONTAINING INKS, PAINTS, AND ADHESIVES
PROCESS WASTEWATER FROM METAL DECREASING OPERATIONS "' *
REACTOR VESSEL WASHOUT CONTAINING TRACE AMOUNTS OF SOLVENT " ;?
RECLAMATION OF SPENT ALKALINE ETCHANT-REQUEST FOR VARIANCE UNDER MOD. CLOSED-LOOP PROVISION , J ^ =
REGULATORY STATUS OF VARIOUS TYPES 'OF PENTACHLOROPHENOL WASTES i = ?
REGULATORY STATUS OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ZIRCONIUM PHOSPHATING OF ALUMINUM CANS : ';
REJECT SUBSTRATES CONTAINING VENADIUM PENTOXIDE REGULATION UNDER RCRA • ; '• -
RESIDUE FROM STREAM-STRIPPING OF PROCESS WASTE CONTAINING TOLUENE " \"~
SOLVENT LISTINGS FOR PAINT WASTES/REMOVER AND SPILL RESIDUE
SOLVENT-CONTAMINATED WASTEWATER FROM FRAGRANCE MANUFACTURE -, - ^ ;.
SOLVENTS USED AS REACTANT NOT LISTED AS SPENT SOLVENT OR COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT '
SPENT CYANIDE PLATING BATH SOLUTIONS FROM SILVER RECOVERY
STILL BOTTOM WASTE GENERATED DURING THE PRODUCTION OF POLYSTYRENE
SUPERNATANT FORMED IN LIME STABILIZATION OF WASTE PICKLE LIQUOR AS HAZARDOUS WASTE ',
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION AND ACCUMULATION PROVISIONS APPLICABILITY TO AN ASH TREATMENT FACILITY
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION APPLICABILITY TO A BAGHOUSE SYSTEM (:
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION APPLICABILITY TO A BAGHOUSE SYSTEM i 5 :, j
WASTES GENERATED FROM EXTRACTION PROCESS : ;v
WASTES GENERATED IN A PROCESS USING METHYLENE CHLORIDE TO RECOVER ALKALOIDS FROM PLANT MATTER
WMKWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES RESULTING FROM METAL CLEANING PROCESS
Page Wo," 60
9441,1986(47)
9444.1988(11)
9441,1987,109),
9442, 1931 UO)
"94,44.1987(04)"
; 9443.1983(04)
i
9441.1985:(12)
9441.1989(541 =
9441.1988!(13)
9554. 1990! (12):
9433.1985i(03)
9444. 1988, (:09|!
9441. 1986 (;96),
9441. 1989, (32) '
9443.1994(05)'
9444.1980(05):
9441.1995(28)
9441.1986;i;33)i
9441.199l!(:05l!
9441.1988i(;03)i
944 1.1986: (24)
9442.1995!(03)-
9592.1993(06),
9444.1985(08)
9441.1988(17):
9441.b.986!(l39);
9444.1987i(22):
9444.1987i(43)^
9433.1987;(10)!
9444.1987:(41)'
9441.1987;(74):
9441.19871(46)!
9444.1986!(15);
9441.1987(09):
9553.1988:102)'
9444.1987|(49)!
9433,1985i(06)i-
9444.1987i(29p
9442. 19891(01) ;
9444.19861(17)
9441.19841(10)'
9444.1987^(11):
9442.1987!(06)i
9441.1986:(92)i
9441.1989(34)
9441. 1988:(40)
9441.1987!(83)i
9432.19871(10)
: 9432.1987;(01)'
J 9432.1986;(15)1
:" 9442.1986i(07)!
i 9441.19861(52)1
i 9444.1989(0^^
i '- -^:-
06/02/816
05/05/S8
02/19/8:7
07/03/91
01/28/8"?
, . |
07/05/83
04/30/85
10/10/89
04/30/88
08/30/90
09/30/85
04/30/88
12/30/86
07/06/89
07/15/94
11/18/80
08/24/95
04/23/86.
04/22/91
01/13/88
03/21/86
02/27/95
10/07/93
05/24/85
05/18/88
05/12/86
06/24/87
; 10/09/87
06/12/87
09/15/87
09/02/87
06/17/87
08/04/86
02/19/87
03/08/88
10/26/87
10/29/85
06/19/87
01/01/89
09/04/86
05/15/84
04/14/87
10/26/87
12/05/86
07/06/89
09/01/88
10/23/87
08/28/87
03/17/87
12/22/86
07/02/86
1 07/02/86
08/21/89
=-; :^:: j
i ~ °"3:v" ,i
: -:^ "'
:„ ;
mm 1
ilH: I
V-^ v ;
^ -,, _r i
.'.- -'- i
;; t." " ; '
;".-* "~'--~ (
|
i
= - v -
— - "- •
•""-". ~£_ H
: -, \ \
--—-=_ - »:^:M I
','f~ff i
i-~~~-f*\ i
»:. 4,5: i
;.-?"ii> {
- _- - ~'_f= ~-
r, ^^ !=*=--- 1
I
"-•-- -"i i
i iMi j
i^, ,^jf i
>-"-?!
---" Jjli -
I:
-:^J.: _,=^!_ !
KV« j
' i!ST:y: 1
;;:;gGji j
r- i
, !t=Vt, •
..^^:i
-_-•"-.••_*.: :
; ;-, -', }
-5*;;S!!i! j
•^/T::. '
-^ ^flP,: 1
,
:"!"^fi' i
"I
l-?-jif i
I
I
ft *
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 61
WATER WALL SPRAY BOOTH WASTES AND THE SOLVENT LISTINGS
9444.1987(06) 02/28/87
Regulated Wastes
•SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS
APPLICABILITY OF MINING WASTE EXCLUSION TO WASTED LIME KILN REFRACTORY BRICKS
CLARIFICATION OF DISCARDED AMMUNITION OF 0.50 CALIBER
DREDGE SEDIMENTS
HAZARDOUS WASTES THAT ARE RECYCLED, HANDLING
RCRA REGULATION OF DOT-TREATED WOOL BLANKETS AS HAZARDOUS WASTE
SEDIMENT SAMPLE DISPOSAL
STORAGE FACILITIES, RCRA APPLICABILITY TO
Smelting Waste
*MINING WASTE EXCLUSION REINTERPRETATION
CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTES GENERATED AT PRIMARY METAL SMELTING AND REFINING SITES
CLASSIFICATION OF A MERCURY RECOVERY UNIT
DROSS FROM ALUMINUM SMELTING USED IN MANUFACTURE OF CEMENT
HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION OF "NICKEL MATTE" BY-PRODUCT
REGULATORY STATUS OF RESIDUES FROM SECONDARY LEAD SMELTERS THAT RECYCLE K069 WASTES
RESIDUES FROM SECONDARY LEAD SMELTERS THAT RECYCLE K069 WASTES
SECONDARY LEAD SMELTER VARIANCES
Soil
DESTRUCTION OF DIOXIN CONTAMINATED SOIL USING MOBILE INCINERATION
FIRE TRAINING PITS, REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR
LEAD-BASED PAINT RESIDUES AND CONTAMINATED SOILS
LEAKS, SPILLS, AND ILLEGAL DISCHARGES OF LISTED WASTES TO SURFACE WATERS, MIXTURE RULE APPLIED TO
SOIL CONTAMINATED WITH CHLORDANE AS A RESULT OF PESTICIDE APPLICATION
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT CLOSURE, APPLICABILITY OF 3005 (i) OF RCRA TO
TCLP
TNT
ADOPTION OF TCLP FOR DELISTING DEMONSTRATIONS
CALCULATION OF TCLP CONCENTRATIONS FROM TOTAL CONCENTRATIONS
TREATMENT STANDARD FOR K106 (LOW MERCURY SUBCATEGORY) NON-WASTEWATER RESIDUES FROM RETORTING/ROASTING (RMERC) UNITS
*PRODUCT WASHWATERS FROM DINITROTOLUENE - Kill LISTING
TNT RED WATER, REUSE OF
Toxicity
•REGULATION OF MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTION ASH
FEDERAL POLICY REGARDING DIOXIN DISPOSAL
INTERPRETATION OF THE PHRASE "WHICH CAN BE REASONABLY EXPECTED TO BE PRESENT" FOR SOIL THAT EXHIBITS THE TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC
IS THE CHEMICAL POTASSIUM HEXACYANOCOBALT (II)-FERRATE (II), USED AT A DOE NUCLEAR PLANT, CONSIDERED A "MIXED WASTE" UNDER RCRA?
LD50 AS CRITERIA FOR LISTING HAZARDOUS WASTE
LEACHING TESTS FOR EVALUATING SOILS CONTAMINATED WITH LEAD
PENTACHLOROPHENOL AS A WOOD PRESERVATIVE
RESIDUES FROM MUNICIPAL WASTE RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITIES
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR DELISTING PETITION
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
TOXICITY OF 2,4,D WASTE
HAZARDOUS WASTE IDENTIFICATION RULE (HWIR)
HAZARDOUS WASTE LISTING DETERMINATION (60 FR 7825, FEBRUARY 9, 1995) OF K156 WASTE FROM THE PRODUCTION OF METHYL CARBAMATE
9444.1986(14)
9441.1994 (11)
9443.1994 (06)
9443.1989(08)
9441.1986(76)
9441.1992(40)
9441.1989(12)
9432.1983 (02)
9441.1985(35)
9443.1986(16)
9498.1994 (03)
9441.1989(01)
9441.1994(32)
9441.1991(14a)
9496.1991(01)
9444.1988(14)
9433.1986(10)
9489.1987(02)
9443.1987(28)
9441.1986(07)
9444.1986 (20)
9476.1987(01)
9433.1990(03)
9445.1992(01)
9554.1994 (04)
9441.1988(20)
9441.1981(04)
9573.1991(01)
9444.1987(26)
9554.1995(01)
9441.1995(30)
9443.1988(09)
9443.1987(24)
9444.1988(15)
9487.1986(08)
9433.1991(02)
9523.00-14
9444.1984(03)
XREF
9441.1995(34)
06/30/86
05/11/94
11/03/94
08/11/89
10/08/86
11/17/92
03/31/89
11/29/83
10/30/85
07/09/86
05/26/94
02/07/89
12/23/94
08/05/91
08/05/91
08/26/88
04/24/86
07/22/87
11/20/87
01/23/86
09/29/86
06/09/87
06/14/90
09/21/92
07/14/94
05/30/88
04/10/81
05/01/91
07/02/87
06/14/95
09/13/95
09/09/88
11/05/87
08/29/88
05/27/86
04/26/91
03/14/86
04/30/84
/ /
11/27/95
-------
IV > » -'•'•'-- f
:
i
»»!!'*? "
: '--, i C1
,: »=»• r^rv »i ; = vM 'i»a
07/02/96
KEYWORD JBPEX
;f;
!«SH
Contaminated Media - " , ;—.; »:- !' : *: j^ / " : ;
CONCERN REGARDING EPA'S:PLANS TO "DISALLOW CONTINUED USE OF THE CORRECTIVE ACTION MANAGEMENT UNIT (CAMU) PROVISION"
HAZARDOUS WASTE IMPORTATION ! Mi ? ! ' ! ! ! & ':' ~ [ !: r: '
(See Import) ,{'.';'- ; 1 ! !L i " i
HEALTH AND SAFETY
; :_ j
:- >^--#^i
_ - :: » 2
9502.1995(03) 10/18/95 *"**
' .
XREF
/ /i
OSItA HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE ACTIVITY - :
SELECTION OF NON-USEPA APPROVED METHODS FOR SUBPART X PERMITS ;
HEALTH ASSESSMENTS
(See Risk Assessment) ;
HIGH TECH WASTES : . '
(See Hazardous Waste Identification)
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE • :
(See also Subtitle D under Solid Waste)
*HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ,
*MEDICAL WASTE - HOUSEHOLD MEDICAL WASTE " 7
CLARIFICATION REGARDING THE "REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION" PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THE RECYCLED USED OIL'MANAGEMENT STANDARDS
DRY CLEANING AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES WASTE NOT EXCLUDED AS HOUSEHOLD WASTE
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION PROGRAMS, CERCLA AND RCRA LIABILITY OF MUNICIPAL SPONSORS OF
HOUSEHOLD WASTES - DISPOSAL OF CARBON-ZINC BATTERIES
LEAD-BASED PAINT RESIDUES AND CONTAMINATED SOILS
MERCURY DRY CELL BATTERIES AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
PROPER DISPOSAL OF OLD MEDICATIONS
RESIDUES FROM U.S. NAVY SALVAGE FUEL BOILER
USED AUTOMOBILE ANTIFREEZE DISPOSAL ]
USED CRANKCASE OIL DISPOSED OF BY DO-IT-YOURSELFERS
Collection Programs
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE -- COLLECTION PROGRAMS, CLARIFICATION OF ISSUES
HOUSEHOLD WASTE EXCLUSION SCOPE
RCRA SUBTITLE C REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION PROGRAMS COLLECTING CESQG WASTE
HOUSEHOLD WASTES
(See Solid Waste)
HSWA
(See Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments)
HSWA PROVISIONS
(See Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments)
HWIR
Waste Identification Rule)
XREF; ; / / V?,iji
9504*. 1987 (02) J 06/05/87 "~^ji
9442.1990(03) 11/19/90 *" *:
XREF1
XREF"
XREF
9441.1988(30);
9441!. 1,989 (24>A
9592.1i994 (10) "
9441.1986(32)
9441.1986(09)::
9441.1984(07)*
9443.1987(28) :
9443.1986(18)"
9574. 1990 (01) i
9441.1987(16)?
9442.1991(18)1
9441.1987(64) ?
/ 1
06/30/88
08/16/89
09/28/94
04/21/86
01/28/86
04/19/84
11/20/87
09/04/86
11/28/90
03/17/87
12/19/91
08/13/87
— C -*
:^=* A
--__ ;,^f- ^
™S*JT!,K
.-- 5
«r,::<{i
^"•siifVl
i-:-'-"?US
*-.- > ,»a Z
.
9574.00-01 , 11/01/88 ^iviae;
9574.1991(01)^ 05/30/91
"9574.00-02 = 07/22/92 |;
* -%"*ltil
XREF / / : '" "^
i wm
V :-!
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 63
NOT WASTE WHEN RETURNED TO THE UNITED STATES FROM JAPAN FOR REGENERATION
HYDROGEOLOGICAL DATA
(See Groundwater Monitoring)
IDENTIFICATION
(See EPA I.D. Number)
IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS
(See EPA I.D. Number)
IGNITABILITY
(See Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
IMPORT
(See also Generators, Transporters)
Bu£™?STE^^
CANADIAN MANIFEST FOR SHIPMENTS ENTERING THE U.S.
GENERATOR RESPONSIBILITIES FOR IMPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
MOVEMENT OF NICKEL CADMIUM BATTERIES FROM MEXICO TO JAPAN VIA THE UNITED STATES
Hazardous Waste Importation
•MANIFEST REQUIREMENTS FOR IMPORTED HAZARDOUS WASTE
*SIGNING THE MANIFEST AS AN AGENT WHEN IMPORTING HAZARDOUS WASTE
INCINERATION
(See also Subpart X under Thermal Treatment)
*RECIRCULATING TANK, REGULATION OF
*WASTE DERIVED FROM TREATING EXEMPT OR EXCLUDED WASTES
A DETERMINATION OF WHETHER A DETOX (SM) WET OXIDATION PROCESS WOULD BE REGULATED UNDER SUBPART X OR UNDER SUBPART O
ACCEPTABLE LEVELS OF RESIDUAL CONTAMINANTS IN THE EPA INCINERATOR RESIDUES (REVISION)
ALTERNATIVE METALS ANALYSIS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE COMBUSTORS
DBLISTING PETITION INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDUES FROM INCINERATION OF 2,4,5-T AND SILVEX PESTICIDES
DETERMINATION OF EQUIVALENT TREATMENT (DET) FOR 8 OF THE WASTE CODES FROM A TOLUENE DHSOCYANATE (TDI) TREATABILITY GROUP
DETERMINATION ON THE LEGALITY AND APPROPRIATENESS OF USING INCINERATION FOR TWO P078 WASTE STREAMS
DOD MUNITIONS BECOME SOLID WASTE SUBJECT TO RCRA WHEN THERE IS AN INTENT TO DISPOSE OR DESTROY THEM
ENFORCEMENT POLICY ON WASTE BURNING FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
INCINERATOR PERMITS TO BURN DIOXIN WASTES, MODIFICATION OF
INCINERATORS THAT RECEIVE GASEOUS EMISSIONS, RCRA EXCLUSION, CAA APPLIES
JURISDICTION AND REGULATION OF MIXED WASTE MANAGEMENT INCLUDING INCINERATION AND LOCATION CRITERIA
METALS PRODUCTION WASTES, APPLICABILITY OF MINING WASTE EXCLUSION - COMBUSTION OF WASTES AS INCINERATION
MIXTURE OF CHARACTERISTIC WASTE AND LISTED WASTE, ASH FROM INCINERATION
MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTION ASH
ON-SITE INCINERATION OF A WASTE THAT IS BOTH A BY-PRODUCT MATERIAL AND HAZARDOUS
REFRACTORY WASTES AT U.S. EPA COMBUSTION RESEARCH FACILITY
RESIDUES REMAINING IN EMPTY CONTAINERS, BURNING OF
SPENT CARBON USED TO REMOVE DISSOLVED PENTACHLOROPHENOL (PCP) FROM GROUNDWATER
SUMMARY OF ASSISTANCE BRANCH PERMITTING COMMENTS
THERMAL RELIEF VENTS ON HAZARDOUS WASTE INCINERATORS, ACCEPTABILITY OF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
9456.1992(01)
9456.1994(01)
9462.1985(01)
9455.1985(01)
9452.1993(01)
9462.1995(01)
9462.1995(02)
XREF
9483.1984(03)
9441.1987(31)
9489.1995(02)
9488.1985(03)
9498.1994(09)
9433.1987(26)
9554.1994(06)
9554.1994(05)
9441.1985(31)
9494.1986(06)
9488.1985(04)
9441.1984(15)
9541.1986(14)
9441.1985(05)
9441.1985(32)
9573.1990(02)
9432.1986(14)
9444.1988(05)
9441.1986(04)
9444.1986(05)
9523.00-18
9488.00-3
/ /
08/31/92
12/16/94
11/29/85
06/25/85
01/28/93
01/31/95
03/31/95
, /
11/30/84
04/30/87
08/02/95
04/01/85
08/17/94
10/28/87
10/24/94
07/26/94
10/03/85
12/31/86
05/30/85
07/31/84
07/03/86
02/04/85
10/07/85
03/29/90
09/06/86
03/11/88
01/07/86
03/03/86
03/14/89
06/30/86
-------
1;
MSB
!;•«;
I M
;i!
a^t-^Bg* ,tf "• if- ja^ jj;: a
Ss*1 aHWJV^f = 5 ^asl, ^ ?lt?* i= fj
= -- - = - - - = =- -
E-Ii-fctili.
67/02/96
II ,!! 5 BIS
nisi !l!il
11!!!
u; «,;;
iihl
- i" to: i • ; H; !,S5s ii[ . u :it
DIFRule m-- « i :! Si M MM
5*REGOI,ATO«Y;STATiraiiOF.MiETALSlRECOVERY!toSDBR RCRA V _- ', ''.' -• ' \ "' ;: :
; j "SHAH RECYCLING POLICY APPLIED TO CERTIFIED BIFs ~ ~ _~ S:_~ - _ : ; _
I j APPLICABILITY OF RCRA REGULATIONS TO A PROPOSED FUMING/GASIFICATION OUST " " II S !
; APPLICATION OF THE BIF RULE TO HERITAGE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC., LBMONT, ILLINOIS
j IBIF REGULATIONS EFFECTS ON INDUSTRIAL BOILER I ' S = , i „ 5 '.
' "BIF RULE APPLIED TO NEHLY REGULATED UNITS AT INTERIM STATUS FACILITIES " ~ =
CARBON REGENERATION UNITS - REGULATORY STATUS - ' ~ :
CLARIFICATION OF REGULATION OF FUEL BLENDING AND RELATED TREATMENT AND STORAGE ACTIVITIES
; .CLARIFICATION OF STATE AND FEDERAL APPLICABILITY OF THE BIF RULE TO LIME KILNS BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE
(CLARIFICATION REGARDING SINGLE EMISSION POINT, MULTI-DEVICE COMBUSTION FACILITIES " ! "
; ;CLASSIFICATION OF OLIN MERCURY RECOVERY UNIT AS AN INDUSTRIAL FURNACE > ' ;i ;
i .COMBINED OPERATION OF THE RESOURCE RECOVERY KILNS AND CEMENT KILNS AT GIANT CEMENT COMPANY, HARLEYVilLLE SC
; "n^nniri°N °F INDUSTRIAL FURNACE AS IT APPLIES TO SMELTING, MELTING, AND REFINING FURNACES HANDLING SECONDARY MATERIALS :
; .DETERMINATION ON WHETHER OR NOT A FACILITY QUALIFIED FOR INTERIM STATUS FOR ITS BOILERS UNDER THE BIF RULE - ™lh*iMjS
' -'^C,™SIOH FR°M RCRA REGULATION FOR SECONDARY MATERIALS USED OR REUSED DIRECTLY AS INGREDIENTS IN AN INDUSTRIAL PROCESS ! '
_GUIDANCE ON TRIAL BURN FAILURES
^HAZARDOUS WASTEWATERS USED AS QUENCHHATER IN CEMENT PRODUCTION
• JIMPACT OF DRAFT HAZARDOUS WASTE MINIMIZATION AND COMBUSTION STRATEGY ON OHIO'S REGIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF AIR REGULATIONS '
;INTERIM STATUS UNDER THE BIF RULE
,K-WASTE FILTER CAKE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF CEMENT
;(REGION V FUEL-BLENDING FACILITIES CONCERNS '
: .REGULATORY DETERMINATION ON THE STATUS OF PRECIOUS METAL RECOVERY FURNACES
1 =D^^nnv INTERPRETATION OP A MOBILE MERCURY RETORTING PROCESS FOR MERCURY CONTAMINATED SOILS FROM NATURAL GAS PIPELINE METERS
^REGULATORY INTERPRETATION OF AUTOMATIC WASTE FEED CUTOFFS IN BOILERS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES ^bHiNh. MbibKS,
i jREGULATORY INTERPRETATIONS UNDER RCRA CONCERNING CERTAIN FUEL BLENDING SCENARIOS
; REGULATORY STATUS OF HAFs AND THE VCR PROCESS UNIT LOCATED AT BORDEN'S GEISMAR, LA FACILITY
REGULATORY STATUS OF NATURAL GAS PIPELINE CONDENSATE
: 5RESIDUES FROM SECONDARY LEAD SMELTERS THAT RECYCLE K069 WASTES
; [RESPONSE TO THE PETITION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION TO CEASE HAZARDOUS WASTE BURNING AND NOTICE OF CITIZEN SUITS
( jSHAM RECYCLING POLICY AS IT PERTAINS TO THE BOILER AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACE RULE
Baghouse Dust
*BAGHOUSE DUST GENERATED FROM REMELTING PRIMARY PRODUCED STEEL
BAGHOUSE DUSTS USED AS, OR TO PRODUCE, AGGREGATE
CLARIFICATION ON THE APPLICABILITY OF RCRA TO A FOUNDRY MANUFACTURING DUCT SYSTEM
EXCLUSIONS FOR K-WASTES DENIED (LACLEDE STEEL)
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS CLARIFICATIONS
RECYCLING OF ZINC OXIDE BAGHOUSE DUST
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION APPLICABILITY TO A BAGHOUSE SYSTEM
Boiler
•HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA REGULATIONS TO A PROPOSED FUMING/GASIFICATION UNIT
BOILER VARIANCE FOR A WASTE HEAT RECOVERY BOILER NOT OF INTEGRAL DESIGN, DENIAL OF
BOILERS AND INCINERATORS, DISTINCTION BETWEEN/INTEGRAL DESIGN STANDARD
BURNING CHARACTERISTIC OFF-SPECIFICATION PETROLEUM PRODUCTS FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE IN BOILERS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES (BIFs)
BURNING OF USED OIL IN THE MARINE INDUSTRY AND USED OIL GENERATOR NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
BURNING OFF-SPECIFICATION USED OIL FUEL IN GREENHOUSES
HALOGEN ACID FURNACES AS INDUSTRIAL FURNACES OR BOILERS
HEAT RECOVERY UNIT AS A BOILER OR AN INCINERATOR
INTEGRAL DESIGN STANDARD IN BOILER DEFINITION (LUBRIZOL)
MIXING LOW AND HIGH BTU WASTES - SHAM BURNING, BLENDING, MANIFESTING
REGULATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TRANSFER OPERATIONS
SITE-SPECIFIC RISK ASSESSMENTS AT COMBUSTION FACILITIES THAT ARE REGULATED UNDER RCRA
01^^ OF ASSISTANCE BRANCH PERMITTING COMMENTS '^
sfl
I iil!
: • si
, t fjK^fijf^fjUff, -t- ;M
i :«
S^j'^sLM?^ ;I--
:; i i!|64 !] i
^_ -5 „=-*-- .
9498»1934JJ;0)W
9488j,1991*(05!)H!
9431. 1994 (02!)ip
9438,1992 (02i)*,
3488O991(03i)lI
9528.1991(01)4
9489.1991(04)EI
9498. 1994 (13 K
9498. 1993 (01)3,,
; 9498.1994(08:)E
9498, 1993 (04 )«;
j ,9498, 1992 (Ol)iS
9488,1993(01)?;
I 9498. 1994
9498,1994(06)-:"
; 9498.1994(04)*:
9489, 1991 (Ol)1
9573.1994(01)3'
: 9528. 1991 (03) if
944l'.1990(35);/;
9441.h.991(17)S<
' 9496.1993(01)^.
9498.1993(03)5?
9494.1993(01)S;
9498.1994(12),;
i 9498. 1993 (02)"
9442.1994(05),,,
,9496,1991(01)14!
9498.1994(01) il
9494.1994(03)sii
a:
i l!
9444. 1984 (16)?:
19493. 1991 (03)W
; 9441. 1995 (33) S'
9441.1989(48)^:
9551.1987(01) «
9443. 1987 (25) sj'
-9432.1987(01) ii
:-= =.;
10/31/94;
10/01/91
11/15/94
12/30/92
09/23/91
08/07/91
08/02/91
12/05/94
04/30/93
07/29/94
12/17/93
08/11/92
12/06/93
07/14/94
07/20/94
07/05/94
02/15/91
01/10/94
08/19/91
12/21/90
11/04/91
12/27/93
11/29/93
09/14/93
11/08/94
06/02/93
04/15/94
08/05/91
04/04/94
06/07/94
08/30/84
06/21/91
10/19/95
09/12/89
01/20/87
11/04/87
03/17/87-
9494.
:9431.
9433.
! 19432.
^9441.
:9494.
; ;9495.
i 19495.
19433.
; i9432.
! !9432.
i i9442.
M9461.
,;9498.
: 9523.
1986(03)§
1994(02) ''
1987(01) i.
1986(02) (I
1986(95)N
1991(01)'
1986(09) j;
1986(05) Si
1986(16) l"i
1985(08) p
1985(10) |j
1987(04) j!
1989(01) i!
1995 (Oj
00-17/
(0^^
'•
03/30/86
11/15/94
01/07/87
01/03/86
12/23/86
02/04/91
04/21/86
03/05/86
08/12/86
11/20/85
12/30/85
08/31/87
01/03/89
11/30/95
09/02/88
-------
07/0?./96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 65
^APPLICABILITY OF RCRA TO VARIOUS PRODUCTS (E.G., CLINKER, FERTILIZER) PRODUCED BY A CEMENT KILN EQUIPPED WITH A RECOVERY SCRUBBER
CEMENT KILN BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FUELS DURING INTERIM STATUS
CEMENT KILN DUST WASTE
CLARIFICATION OF RCRA REGULATORY APPLICATION TO SOILS CONTAMINATED BY CEMENT KILN DUST
CLARIFICATION OF RCRA REGULATORY APPLICATION TO SOILS CONTAMINATED BY CEMENT KILN DUST
CLARIFICATION OF REGULATION OF FUEL BLENDING AND RELATED TREATMENT AND STORAGE ACTIVITIES
CLARIFICATION REGARDING SINGLE EMISSION POINT, MULTI-DEVICE COMBUSTION FACILITIES
ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS ASSOCIATED WITH BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE IN CEMENT KILNS
EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR PART A SUBMITTAL AND INTERIM STATUS APPLICABILITY FOR CEMENT KILNS
MINERAL PROCESSING RESIDUALS FROM COMBUSTION UNITS BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL
RCRA STORAGE FACILITY REQUIREMENTS, OFF-LOADING FROM TANK TRUCKS
RECYCLING OF ELECTROPLATING SLUDGES (F006) FOR CEMENT/AGGREGATE MANUFACTURE
. REGULATORY STATUS OF CEMENT PRODUCED USING HAZARDOUS WASTE FUELS
REGULATORY STATUS OF PRODUCTS (INCLUDING CLINKER AND FERTILIZER) PRODUCED IN CEMENT KILNS EQUIPPED WITH A RECOVERY SCRUBBER
SHAM INCINERATION AND TREATMENT OF K048-K052 WASTES IN CEMENT KILNS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES
USED OIL DEFINITION APPLICABILITY TO OPEN-GEAR LUBRICANT
WASTE-DERIVED FUELS BURNED IN CEMENT KILN, REGULATION OF
ZINC OXIDE RECLAIMED FROM KILNS
Destruction Removal Efficiency (ORE)
ASSURING PROTECTIVE OPERATION OF INCINERATORS BURNING DIOXIN-LISTED WASTES
VIABILITY OF TRIAL BURN RESULTS WITH INCOMPLETE VOST DATA
Electric Arc Furnace
EMISSION CONTROL DUST/SLUDGE FROM ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE AT FOUNDRY NOT A K061 WASTE
EXCLUSIONS FOR K-WASTES DENIED (LACLEDE STEEL)
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY PRODUCTION OF STEEL IN ELECTRIC ARC FURNACES
RECYCLING OF ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE DUST
RECYCLING OF K061 AS AN INGREDIENT IN CEMENT
REGULATORY DETERMINATION ON THE STATUS OF A LEAD/COPPER METAL PRODUCED BY METALS RECYCLING TECHNOLOGIES (MRT)
STAINLESS STEEL PRODUCTION RESIDUES
STATUS OF ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE DUST INCORPORATED INTO GLASS FRIT
Furnace
BURNING USED OIL GENERATED BY PRIVATE BOAT OWNERS ON-SITE
DEPARTMENT OF ARMY MUNITION DEACTIVATION POPPING FURNACE
EXCLUSION FROM RCRA REGULATION FOR SECONDARY MATERIALS USED OR REUSED DIRECTLY AS INGREDIENTS IN AN INDUSTRIAL PROCESS
POPPING FURNACES-DOD DISPOSAL OF OUTDATED ORDNANCE BY INCINERATION - METALS RECOVERY
RECOVERY KILN AS AN INDUSTRIAL FURNACE
REGULATORY DETERMINATION OF THE PRIMER NEUTRALIZATION UNIT "POPPING FURNACE"
HaZaDETERMINATIONUONSWHETHER OR NOT A FACILITY QUALIFIED FOR INTERIM STATUS FOR ITS BOILERS UNDER THE BIF RULE
REGULATORY INTERPRETATION OF AUTOMATIC WASTE FEED CUTOFFS IN BOILERS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES
USED OIL FUELS BURNED IN INCINERATORS
Incinerator Residue
*REGULATION OF MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTION ASH
INCINERATOR RESIDUES FROM TRIAL BURN
SCRUBBER BRINE/SLUDGE PRODUCED IN INCINERATION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE ,.„.„„,,„ u,cTC-c
TRIPLE-RINSING REQUIREMENT APPLICABLE TO CONTAINERS HOLDING RESIDUES FROM THE INCINERATION OF ACUTE HAZARDOUS WASTES
WASTE GENERATED BY AN INCINERATOR TRIAL BURN OF SAND SPIKED WITH TRICHLOROBENZENE AND HEXACHLOROETHANE
9441.1994 (14)
9528.1987(10)
9441.1988(36)
9441.1993(11)
9441.1993(16)
9498.1994(13)
9498.1994(08)
9441.1987(78)
9528.1987(12)
9441.1984(19)
9488.1988(01)
9441.1989(19)
9441.1993(22)
9441.1994(12)
9494.1991(02)
9441.1990(33)
9494.1985(03)
9444.1988(02a)
9488.1992(01)
9488.1987(09)
9441.1984(08)
9441.1989(48)
9444.1986(02)
9441.1988(27)
9441.1990(03)
9441.1994(23)
9441.1988(07)
9441.1992(42)
9494.1991(04)
9488.1987(03)
9498.1994(06)
9441.1983(04)
9488.1989(02)
9489.1994(02)
9498.1994(05)
9494.1993(01)
9495.1986(13)
9573.1991(01)
9488.1990(01)
9441.1984(05)
9431.1993(01)
9441.1988(04)
06/09/94
09/03/87
07/29/88
06/30/93
09/15/93
12/05/94
07/29/94
10/08/87
09/18/87
08/15/84
12/09/88
04/26/89
11/02/93
05/17/94
03/29/91
11/30/90
10/11/85
01/26/88
09/22/92
10/15/87
05/03/84
09/12/89
01/27/86
06/15/88
02/13/90
08/19/94
03/10/88
12/01/92
04/23/91
03/25/87
07/20/94
06/08/83
10/04/89
09/19/94
07/14/94
09/14/93
06/27/86
05/01/91
03/29/90
02/19/84
07/28/93
01/14/88
Incinerators
•CHANGES TO INTERIM STATUS FACILITIES
9528.1989(11) 07/30/89
-------
07/02/96
I =!
= = °P= T^S-'^1!^^^? .5^— ^"g° -33 3= 33 3333333- -333 3 ^3L33333g; 5 3g --33- 533 33 — ^3= Jy , 33 ^ 3- - -3—5; -3 - 1,333, 3-q , , ,,,-3,, ,p 3 3 ,3 , , - 3= ,3 3 3 -35-
S ! MM,!! -flic
i : ii it <*«» , ;«•!-,,,. ;-»;»
; = 5 3- = = ,3^5 ,,35_,, 3J - . 355*-- .3. _ , >3 -_ ' - , T 5.. 3 '- - 3. , _ ,3 I . = . - .
533 33 3=i -3=33 33 ^ , y r : ^3— " ^ " 53=- 335 , - - 33 =- 3 -_ 3- - - -_ ^ "3- - ,3 ; - 33- S _,,--.-,, 5. -- 33-,— - 3 -_r _. -_- -_
_ I V'_j^f,mf_ IP BiT^Tit 3*53T ^33Uetis5 --! ,5, 53 - 1 ,« 3 -3,ai Ji - ^ - , 55,33 -33 ,5 , ,3 3I3 -5-=5|- 1,3 - 1 I 3Ja^3 | -flf'
-" V- ------ 7- "•---'"" _ f - ,, - * s -"--"-- ,- - i
G '•'-_.' i - r- - v - .- - - KBYBORD INDEX
= : ; s; Msn
l *FUMB INCINERATORS :«: %i^^ ^,,; W"C Jfc,.* -:;:*,:»*:;-• "; -~ . ." -v. -' -*--'= :; -/
: 'HAZARDOUS CHASTE FUEL IN I'HCTMBRATORSirf,,, ^ » ^vK-f :,, ^Swvs V :- ' ^ -.-- — -.-. =..;-,.=
APPLICABILITY OF RCRAi REGULATIONS TO A*PROPOSED«FUMING/GASJ,FK.ATION UNIT - ^ - - -
! ASSURING PROTECTIVE OPERATION OF INCINERATORS, BURNING DIOXBMLISTED HASTES ^^^^ ,_,,,,=
' BOILER VARIANCE FOR A HASTE HEAT RECOVERY BOILER NOT OF INTEGRAL DESIGN, DENIAL OF
• BOILERS AND INCINERATORS, DISTINCTION BETWEEN/ INTEGRAL DESIGN STANDARD =
1 CHEMICAL AGENT/MUNITIONS SYSTEM (CADMS) IS NOT TOTALLY ENCLOSED AND SUGGESTED RD&D=PERMIT =
CHLORINE EMISSIONS FROM HAZARDOUS HASTE INCINERATORS
CLARIFICATION ON THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN THERMAL DESORBERS AND INCINERATORS
CLARIFICATION REGARDING SINGLE EMISSION POINT, MULTI -DEVICE COMBUSTION FACILITIES = '
1 CLARIFICATION: IS A FACILITY THAT HAS A "PRIMARY PURPOSE" OF BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FOR DESTRUCTION SUBJECT TO
'•• CLEAN CLOSURE AND DISPOSAL OF AN INCINERATOR
CLOSURE PLAN FOR THE HAZARDOUS WASTE STORAGE UNITS AT VERTAC'S SHUTDOWN MANUFACTURING PLANT
1 CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW INCINERATOR WITH THE CHANGES DURING INTERIM STATUS :
, CONTROL DEVICES REQUIRED BY THE ORGANIC AIR EMISSION STANDARD
i DEACTIVATION (POPPING) FURNACES AS INCINERATORS i ~ : :
DELISTING PETITION FOR INCINERATOR ASH
1 DESTRUCTION OF DIOXIN CONTAMINATED SOIL USING MOBILE INCINERATION :
DIOXIN TRIAL BURNS FOR PURPOSES OF CERTIFICATION OR A RCRA PERMIT
DISTILLATION OR FRACTIONATION COLUMN BOTTOMS FROM THE PRODUCTION OF CIILOROBF.NZENE 7
; GUIDANCE IN DESIGNATING POHC'S
GUIDANCE ON TRIAL BURN FAILURES
GUIDANCE ON. USING ALTERNATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT APPROACHES IN DETERMINING INCINERATOR METALS EMISSION LIMITS
"- HEAT RECOVERY UNIT AS A BOILER OR AN INCINERATOR
- INCINERATOR METALS EMISSIONS CONTROLS i
• INCINERATOR NOT CONSIDERED TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT -
1 INCINERATORS FOR DESTRUCTION OF NERVE AGENTS, HIGH PRIORITY PERMITTING
: INTEGRAL DESIGN STANDARD IN BOILER DEFINITION (LUBRIZOL)
• INTERIM STATUS EXPANSION TO ADD AN INCINERATOR
' INTERIM STATUS EXPANSION TO ADD AN INCINERATOR
i LDR RULES REGARDING ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR LAB PACKS
' MUNICIPAL WASTE INCINERATOR ASH MANAGEMENT :
• NEW JERSEY ZINC COMPANY K061 STORAGE PILE
; OMNIBUS AUTHORITY TO CONTROL EMISSIONS OF METALS, HCL & PICs FROM INCINERATORS
! PARTIAL PERMITTING OF INCINERATOR UNIT (DOW) :
! PERMITTING INCINERATORS ! ! :
! PERMITTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE INCINERATORS !
: PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS FOR A PCB INCINERATOR
: PICKLE LIQUOR RECOVERY UNIT AS AN INDUSTRIAL FURNACE
! POHC SELECTION FOR RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE TRIAL BURN - USE OF 1,2, 3-TRICHLOROBENZENE
i — PROPOSED RULES IMPACT ON PERMIT DEADLINES
! QUANTUM TECH PLASMA ARC UNIT - REGULATORY CLASSIFICATION
: REYNOLDS METALS COMPANY INCINERATOR
: SITE-SPECIFIC RISK ASSESSMENTS AT COMBUSTION FACILITIES THAT ARE REGULATED UNDER RCRA
SPENT FLUIDIZED BED MEDIA AND CHANGES UNDER INTERIM STATUS
I SUMMARY OF ASSISTANCE BRANCH PERMITTING COMMENTS
i TCLP PARTICLE SIZE REDUCTION EXEMPTION FOR MUNITIONS ! :
THERMAL OXIDATION UNIT/FUME INCINERATOR AND CYANURIC CHLORIDE WASTE
- THIRD THIRD LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
' TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION AND ACCUMULATION PROVISIONS APPLICABILITY TO AN ASH TREATMENT FACILITY
: USE OF OMNIBUS AUTHORITY TO CONTROL EMMISSIONS OF METALS, HCL, AND PICS FROM HAZARDOUS WASTE INCINERATORS
Industrial Furnace
*REGULATORY STATUS OF METALS RECOVERY UNDER RCRA : !
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA REGULATIONS TO A PROPOSED FUMING/GASIFICATION UNIT ;
BOILERS AND INCINERATORS, DISTINCTION BETWEEN/ INTEGRAL DESIGN STANDARD i i
jJ^ERS USED IN GREENHOUSE OPERATIONS ARE INDUSTRIAL BOILERS ^^^ , :
:: ' - : ! :r r e IE t is,' i \fs • i
HI : i : i ! ii mm ill ! i
-5= i = : = - i- ==3-,==: = -= s=s - ==" - = = IT f
ii( , F , 5 ft9* ST P 9 FT * *
= i =. -.= ,=:- -,l-~, j. ._
: ._.._=_-_" i _ _ - =_ ^ " -
-• '- - l IH f. =-,-_--.. \ ~ ii t - ;
si ;! -::*-:- fi :i! i ;
; ' = ^T if , I _
•' ' . ! 1 ' '! ill ' " ! ! I ! 1
• J ,5 . J 3
- •'.-•'.'"''-. / 9488;,(1986(103;)i
j !; , - 9441i.J1986{,87!);
"""='" 9431. 1994 (loa;
= 948811992 {,0l|}l
94 33 .1987 (toil1
_94 32,1986 C02)i
=== =9432.1985(07)1
9488.1990 (;02),
9489.1994 (iOD-
9498. 1994 (08)'
RCRAi REGULATIONS? 9498 .1994 (:07)(
9488.1987(504);
9488.1987001);
I ': 9528.1986(07)1
9534.1991(01);
_9432.1987(07)P
9433.1991(03);
9488.1986(05).
9488.00-1A
9441.1988(11)
- 9488.1988(02);
_9498. ,1994 (04)'
9488!.'1992(02))
; 9432J1985I08)"
9488.1989(03)'
: 9432.1987(06)'
: 9501.1986(01),
9432.1985(10)i
9528.1987(15);
9528.00-1 s
9554^1990(13),
9573.1986(01)1
= 9481. 1988(01)'
9524.1989(01)i
-; 9522.1985(04)^
" • Sg488.00-2 !
; 950ia982(01)!
9488.1986(04)'
9432.1987(13),
9488.1991(01)=
. i_ ... . 9501_,1987(03)_
7 9488:.|1991(04),:
9523:.il986(04)r
9498.1l995(02)|
* ' 9444 J1986I28)'
; ' 9523^00-17 i
'; ' -9442.1991(16)1
9488.1986(06):
9551.1990(15)
9432.1987(10):
4 ; 9488,1989(01)1
-- " r
I- _ P
• ' =9498,1994(10)1
; : 9431^1994(02)1
! 1 a 9432 J1986 (02)1
; . _ 9432 <1986 (&j*
i i : i i
Mi,!
5 1 - -- |
1 = ! ;= 3
: i : : :
I
Page Ho. 66
03/30/8B
ii/so/se
11/15/94
09/22/92
01/07/87
01/03/86
11/19/85
04/19/90
02/23/94
07/29/94
07/21/94
06/12/87
02/09/87
09/19/86
12/03/91
07/17/87
07/10/91
04/24/86
05/07/86
04/21/88
01/13/88
07/05/94
11/17/92
11/20/85
10/17/89
07/02/87
09/11/86
12/30/85
11/25/87
11/25/87
11/20/90
06/27/86
01/25/88
02/27/89
08/30/85
06/10/86
07/09/82
04/11/86
11/10/87
02/05/91
. 12/28/87 ,
09/30/91
10/27/86
11/30/95
12/05/86
09/02/88
05/01/91
04/30/86
12/20/90
08/28/87
02/27/89
10/31/94
11/15/94
01/03/86
01/09/86
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 61
^^
CLASSIFICATION OF A MERCURY RECOVERY UNIT
CLASSIFICATION OF OLIN MERCURY RECOVERY UNIT AS AN INDUSTRIAL FURNACE
T0
~TIONS?
SMELTING. MELTING, AND REFINING FURNACES HANDLING SECONDARY MATERIALS
DISTILLATION OR FRACTIONATION COLUMN BOTTOMS FROM THE PRODUCTION OF CHLOROBENZENE
HALOGEN ACID FURNACES AS INDUSTRIAL FURNACES OR BOILERS
INDUSTRIAL FURNACE WHICH CEASES BURNING STATUS UNDER BIF REGULATION
INDUSTRIAL FURNACES BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTES AND THE RESIDUALS GENERATED (LOUISIANA REG)
PICKLE LIQUOR RECOVERY UNIT AS AN INDUSTRIAL FURNACE
rERZ™^TMOB^^ CONTAMINATED SOILS FROM NATURAL GAS PIPELINE METERS
REGULATORY INTERPRETATIONS UNDER RCRA CONCERNING CERTAIN FUEL BLENDING SCENARIOS
REGULATORY STATUS OF HAFs AND THE VCR PROCESS UNIT LOCATED AT BORDEN'S GEISMAR, LA FACILITY
SITE-SPECIFIC RISK ASSESSMENTS AT COMBUSTION FACILITIES THAT ARE REGULATED UNDER RCRA
SULFUR RECOVERY FURNACES ARE INDUSTRIAL FURNACES SUBJECT TO THE WASTE-AS-FUEL RULES
WASTE-DERIVED FUELS BURNED IN CEMENT KILN, REGULATION OF
POHCs
DEPARTMENT OF ARMY MUNITION DEACTIVATION POPPING FURNACE
GUIDANCE IN DESIGNATING POHC' 3
WATER-STRIPPED POHCs ON INCINERATOR ORE
SCrUIN?ERPRCTATION OF THE MIXTURE RULE EXEMPTION AS IT RELATES TO SCRUBBER WATER FROM THE INCINERATION OF CERTAIN SOLVENTS
WASTE CODES AND TREATMENT RESIDUES
73 USE OF°METAL SURROGATES IN COMPLYING WITH THE BOILER AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACE (BIF) RULE
Trial Burn
DELISTING ISSUES RELATING TO EPA'S MOBILE INCINERATOR
DIOXIN TRIAL BURNS FOR PURPOSES OF CERTIFICATION OR A RCRA PERMIT
EXISTING INCINERATORS AND DATA IN LIEU OF TRIAL BURN
GUIDANCE IN DESIGNATING POHC'S
MINIMIZATION AND COMBUSTION STRATEGY ON OHIO'S REGIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF AIR REGULATIONS
INCINERATOR RESIDUES FROM TRIAL BURN
INCINERATOR TRIAL BURN SCHEDULES
TRIAL BURNS, Q&A REPORT
USE OF METAL SURROGATES IN COMPLYING WITH THE BOILER AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACE (BIF) RULE
38 CLARIFICATION REGARDING SINGLE EMISSION POINT, MULTI -DEVICE COMBUSTION FACILITIES
INCINERATORS BURNING NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE
MINIMUM HEAT CONTENT REQUIREMENTS OF WASTE-DERIVED FUEL BLENDED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY IN BIFs
REGULATORY INTERPRETATION OF AUTOMATIC WASTE FEED CUTOFFS IN BOILERS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES
INCINERATOR RESIDUE
(See Incineration)
INCINERATORS
(See Incineration)
9441.1986(95)
9498.1994(07)
9498.1994(03)
9498.1993(04)
9432.1987(07)
9488.1993(01)
9441.1988(11)
9433.1986(16)
9488.1991(02)
9494.1987(02)
9432.1987(13)
9496.1993(01)
9498.1993(03)
9498.1994(12)
9498.1993(02)
9498.1995(02)
9432.1986(04)
9494.1985(03)
9488.1987(03)
9488.1988(02)
9488.1985(07)
9441.1994(16)
9554.1990(03)
9498.1995(01)
9433.1986(20)
9488.00-1A
9523.1982(01)
9488.1988(02)
9498.1994(04)
9573.1994(01)
9488.1990(01)
9488.1987(10)
9523.1984(06)
9498.1995(01)
9498.1994(08)
9524.1985(01)
9498.1994(11)
9494.1993(01)
12/23/86
07/21/94
05/26/94
12/17/93
07/17/87
12/06/93
04/21/88
08/12/86
06/06/91
04/15/87
11/10/87
12/27/93
11/29/93
11/08/94
06/02/93
11/30/95
01/21/86
10/11/85
03/25/87
01/13/88
06/26/85
06/10/94
03/07/90
11/09/95
12/11/86
05/07/86
10/22/82
01/13/88
07/05/94
01/10/94
03/29/90
12/09/87
09/10/84
11/09/95
07/29/94
08/01/85
11/04/94
09/14/93
XREF
XREF
-------
I Ml
M II N! 11 P I!• I 1 i! I
"I I !
ni ' « s" III' I i i i
IB"
!» Hi
:i« 1« K- IWWi «
Ipr^S^:-
i i _
i^T- •'«:?:;
L - 07/02/96
IE"'" '1-
ii- •;
H s; t iNcnMj»r,r
; jrii:
-. ^ ^Bsril
i;: ~* - ;
. f . =,^- :i:=
n« 0j\B*ri
1 r -mm nH i
- - = 3ii v^» i
-= ^ -!-• i
, ,, , i-.
, .-«"
Mtei'^SI
^ ' ;;; '
li s ;:: ;
f~ - - :
IB ' 'I! i
=_; ^-.i-i
^
V:i.i= *- §
:; ;: :;« h^i^!
1 1 i!« 1 « B M, : t
1 = 1 5 |= - -= ^ 555 - =_: = s
- « .
!! :i
;;,';">
KEYWORD IMOEX
S : afj; 5 sr
;(Sca Permit Application) , ji.
INDUSTRIAL FURNACE
(See Incineration) M i Hi = t i : . -s • - : =!! i;I
INSPECTIONS ; | '! " : ; •
(See Compliance) -s i j, - i : : _ .
INSURANCE : -. "- "•; :
: -: i f;: - ,: ~ i ; .
(See Financial Responsibility) ; ,
INTERIM AUTHORIZATION
(See State Authorization) • ; ' r -
INTERIM STATUS PROCESS : " : ' '. . '
(See also Construction) ; - ! ,; : "* ;" '* ; ^ ;
'EXISTING PORTION OF A LAND DISPOSAL UNIT, DEFINITION C260.10) ; : "" "" : ; ,
'EXISTING PORTION, DEFINITION AND HSWA IMPACT : " : '"
'HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS - EXISTING VS. NEW TANK; '. • \ \ , ! ^ ;f-: ;-' - = -'-,'-
'INTERIM STATUS FOR MILITARY FACILITIES OPEN BURNING AREA ••'-'• =' =« -
'LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTION, DIOXINS, AND 90-DAY ACCUMULATION -"""-.
BIF RULE APPLIED TO NEWLY REGULATED UNITS AT INTERIM STATUS FACILITIES s ,: j '- \ - -,
BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE IN BOILERS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES (BIFs) - s ,J '*• -', '* :- '- , : ,-\ .--
CLARIFICATION REGARDING SINGLE EMISSION POINT, MULTI-DEVICE COMBUSTION FACILITIES;
DELISTING, INTERIM STATUS, AND SAMPLING ISSUES AT U.S. NAMEPLATE COMPANY I ?»«S '-•= • ' •
IS A SECTION 3008 (h) ENFORCEMENT ORDER AN APPROPRIATE MECHANISM FOR APPROVING A CAMU? ;? ; -7 : '-
RESPONSE TO THE PETITION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION TO CEASE HAZARDOUS WASTE BURNING AND NOTICE OF CITIZEN SUITS*
SLUDGE WASTE HANDLING IF TEMP. EXCLUSION IS WITHDRAWN / FUTURE METALS RECOVERY-STEEL FACILITY ! .,
Change During Interim Status - I
'ADDITION OF A SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT TO AN EXISTING INTERIM STATUS FACILITY
'ADDITION OF NEW HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT UNIT !
'CHANGES AT INTERIM STATUS TANK FACILITIES
'CHANGES DURING INTERIM STATUS - CORPORATE REORGANIZATION - - •'•- —
'CHANGES DURING INTERIM STATUS - CORRECTION =
'CHANGES IN INTERIM STATUS - SELLING PART OF A FACILITY
'CHANGES TO INTERIM STATUS FACILITIES
'CHANGES TO INTERIM STATUS TANK FACILITIES '
'CONSTRUCTION DURING INTERIM STATUS - RECONSTRUCTION LIMIT WHERE SC*IE UNITS HAVE CLOSED
'CONSTRUCTION DURING INTERIM STATUS WHERE ORIGINAL UNITS ARE CLOSED ! j
'DELISTING OF K051 WASTE AT PETROLEUM REFINERY - EFFECT ON INTERIM STATUS : "
'INTERIM STATUS VS. PERMIT MODIFICATION FOR NEWLY REGULATED UNITS
'RECONSTRUCTION DURING INTERIM STATUS
'RETROFITTING INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
CHANGES TO FACILITIES DURING INTERIM STATUS
CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW INCINERATOR WITH THE CHANGES DURING INTERIM STATUS '. '_
CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW LANDFILL CELL AND THE OMNIBUS PROVISION ! 5
CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER, REGULATORY STATUS OF '
FACILITY CHANGES DURING INTERIM STATUS I - \ t
TRANSFER/RECONSTRUCTION DURING INTERIM STATUS
68
XREF .;i
;ijl « y y
XREF 'W i: a s
XREF
XREF
XREF
9432.1982(01)
9432.1985(05)
9483.1988(09)
9441.1984(04)
9551.1987(04)
9528.1991(01)
9494.1991(01)
9498.1994(08)
9433.1987(03)
9502.1995(01) =
9498.1994(01)
9433.1986,(17jjg;
9528.1985(01),
9528.1983(01)5?
9528.1987(09) ""*
-9528. 1985 (04)-r
9528.1988(05)";
9528. 1987 (16) 1;
9528.1989(ll)i
9483.1988(16)
9528.1987(04) :-
9528. 1987 (03) ift
9433.1986(12) "?;
9525. 1989 (01) ,1L
9528.1985(02);;,
9528. 1988 (03)*»
9528.1982(01);«
9528.1986(07)8
9528. 1986 (Ol)B
9528.1987(02)|B
9528. 1982 (02) IP
9477. 1986 (OJ^^
/ /
08/30/82
08/08/85
05/30/88
02/18/84
01/30/87
08/07/91
02/04/91
07/29/94
02/25/87
02/17/95
04/04/94
09/30/86
12/30/85
03/30/83
08/30/87
'10/30/85
10/30/88
11/30/87
07/30/89
09/30/88
03/30/87
03/30/87
04/30/86
05/30/89
01/31/85
05/30/88
05/28/82
09/19/86
03/03/86
03/11/87
07/20/82
.01/03/86
-------
07/02/95
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 69
IMPROVEMENTS TO SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS UNDER INTRRIM STATUS
INTERIM STATUS EXPANSION TO ADD AN INCINERATOR
INTERIM STATUS EXPANSION TO ADD AN INCINERATOR
INTERIM STATUS OF PROPOSED LANDFILL CELLS
NEW WASTE STREAMS AT INTERIM STATUS FACILITIES
NEWLY IDENTIFIED WASTE STREAMS AS A RESULT OF NEW TC
NEWLY REGULATED UNITS AT PERMITTED FACILITIES
PERMITTING UNITS CREATED FOR FACILITY CLOSURE
REDESIGNATION OF SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS AS LANDFILLS DURING INTERIM STATUS
SPENT FLUIDIZED BED MEDIA AND CHANGES UNDER INTERIM STATUS
TRANSFER OF A HAZARDOUS WASTE STORAGE OPERATION TO A NEW SITE
° °S»GROUNDWATER MONITORING - ASSESSMENT MONITORING/CORRECTIVE ACTION AT CLOSED INTERIM STATUS FACILITIES
*LEASING OF PROPERTY PRIOR TO CLOSURE
3008(h) OF THE SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL ACT, INTERPRETATION OF
DEADLINES APPLICABLE TO PROPOSED DELAY OF CLOSURE REGULATION, GUIDANCE
DEMONSTRATING EQUIVALENCE OF PART 265 CLEAN CLOSURE WITH PART 264 REQUIREMENTS
MUNITIONS REGULATED AS HAZARDOUS WASTES
NEUTRALIZATION SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, GROUNDWATER MONITORING FOR CLOSURE OF INTERIM-STATUS
POST-CLOSURE PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS FOR NON-REGULATED UNITS
' PUBLIC PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS FOR CLOSURE PLAN APPROVAL
REGULATORY INTERPRETATION OF OBJECTION TO CLEAN-CLOSURE EQUIVALENCY PETITION FOR STEEL ABRASIVES, INC.
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT CLOSURE, APPLICABILITY OF 3005 (i) OF RCRA TO
Corrective Action
*CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT
GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATED WITH HAZARDOUS WASTE LEACHATE
GUIDANCE ON HOW TO COORDINATE PERMIT 3004 (U) AND ORDER 3008 (H) REQUIREMENTS FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION
INTERPRETATION OF RCRA REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO THE REMEDIATION OF CONTAMINATION
RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION PROCEDURES AND AUTHORITIES
RELEASES OF HAZARDOUS WASTE, RCRA APPLICABILITY TO
Loss of Interim Status
*APPEAL/RECOURSE PROCESS FOR PERMIT DENIAL
*CORRECTIVE ACTION AUTHORITY AT FACILITIES THAT LOSE INTERIM STATUS
*GROUNDWATER MONITORING AT NEWLY REGULATED FACILITIES
*LOSS OF INTERIM STATUS
*LOSS OF INTERIM STATUS - LAND DISPOSAL FACILITIES
ISS™™ «™ GWM AND FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS
*TSDF CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE AFTER LOSS OF INTERIM STATUS
CLOSURE OF A DOE SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT THAT LOST INTERIM STATUS
ENFORCEMENT OF APPLICABLE RCRA REGULATIONS AT FACILITIES WITH PENDING DELISTING PETITIONS
LOSS OF FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY COVERAGE ON INTERIM STATUS AND PERMIT ISSUANCE
LOSS OF INTERIM STATUS FROM NEWLY IDENTIFIED TC WASTES
PENALTIES FOR FAILURE TO SUBMIT A COMPLETE AND ADEQUATE PART B APPLICATION
PERMITTING UNITS OR FACILITIES THAT HAVE LOST INTERIM STATUS
PERMITTING UNITS OR FACILITIES THAT HAVE LOST INTERIM STATUS
RCRA 3001(£) (2) (b) AND STATES' EXCLUSION OF WASTES FROM REGULATION AS HAZARDOUS
RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION PROCEDURES AND AUTHORITIES
REGULATORY INTERPRETATION OF LOSS OF INTERIM STATUS PROVISIONS AS IT APPLIES TO OB/OD FACILITIES
STATE PROGRAM ADVISORY «2 - RCRA AUTHORIZATION TO REGULATE MIXED WASTE
TEMPORARILY AND INFORMALLY DELISTED WASTES, REGULATORY STATUS
Obtaining Interim Status
*BURNING AND BLENDING AND INTERIM STATUS
9528.1984 (01)
9528.1987(15)
9528.00-1
9487.1981(01)
9528.1990(01)
9528.1990(03)
9528.1986(04)
9476.1985(03)
9528.1988(02)
9444.1986(28)
9528.1986(03)
9481.1988(02)
9528.1983(03)
9502.1985(09)
9476.1988(04)
9476.00-18
9441.1990(23)
9484.1986(03)
9476.1985(04)
9476.1989(03)
9476.1990(01)
9476.1987(01)
9484.1986(07)
9441.1986(83)
9502.1989(04)
9502.1989(03)
9502.1986(02)
9502.1987(05)
9521. 1986 (04a)
9528.1987(01)
9481.1992(01)
9528.1985(05)
9528.1985(03)
9471.1984 (05)
9470.1985(01)
9476.1991(02)
9484.1986(02)
9433.1987(14)
9528.1985(09)
9528.1990(02)
9523.1984(10)
9528.1986(11)
9528.1986(08)
9433.1986(09)
9502.1986(02)
9528.1992(01)
9541.00-6
9433.1986(05)
09/10/84
11/25/87
11/25/87
03/12/81
04/02/90
07/11/90
01/30/86
09/11/85
05/11/88
12/05/86
03/03/86
04/30/88
09/30/83
12/16/85
05/31/88
05/12/89
08/21/90
04/09/86
09/25/85
09/07/89
06/04/90
06/09/87
07/30/86
11/13/86
08/10/89
06/15/89
01/31/86
04/02/87
04/30/86
01/30/87
04/30/92
10/31/85'
09/30/85
12/30/84
02/28/85
10/01/91
04/02/86
07/20/87
11/27/85
07/11/90
12/18/84
12/10/86
11/20/86
04/16/86
01/31/86
10/15/92
07/30/87
02/24/86
9528.1985(11) 12/30/85
-------
H
•t -I!! ; ! ; •" i • '*T : :E 3 i
If IK ! |
:? K ii
' \- r=^- i ? ;~5riR : = I
! : :PS i ••
07/02/96
nil HE? "-'is
~~ -- ~~
;
!!
*ClReyMSTAf«CES! FOR OBTAIMtNG :IHTER1H| STATUS FOR iOMTS^AT AW BHBRIH STATUS FftCTUTY " -:'°
'INTERIM STATUS AND SQO •*» rnvuuu. ... ,
, *INTERIM STATUS FOR RECEIVING SQG HASTE ; , 1 ;
i •• [*LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTION, DIOXINS, AND 9X1JDAY (ACCUMULATION ! ~ ~
-•LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - STORAGE OF HAZARDOUS HASTE
: CALL- IN OF STORAGE AND TREATMENT APPLICATIONS ! =
ICBMKNT KILN BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FUELS DURING INTERIM STATUS
COMPLYING WITH RCRA INTERIM STATUS STANDARDS WHILE DEVELOPING A PERMIT APPLICATION ' r
DETERMINATION ON WHETHER OR NOT A FACILITY QUALIFIED FOR INTERIM STATUS FOR ITS BOILERS UNDER THE
EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR PART A SUBMITTAL AND INTERIM STATUS APPLICABILITY FOR CEMENT KILNS
'INTERIM STATUS QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS TO HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL STORAGE FACILITIES APPLIED1 '
INTERIM STATUS REQUIREMENTS FOR NRC LICENSEES MANAGING RADIOACTIVE MIXED WASTE, CLARIFICATION>
INTERIM STATUS UNDER THE BIF RULE
; /.MARKETING OR BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL, NOTIFICATION OF
,MOBILE TREATMENT UNITS QUALIFIED FOR INTERIM STATUS
•REGULATION OF RADIOACTIVE MIXED WASTE AT DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FACILITIES '•
REQUIREMENT THAT STATE-PERMITTED HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES HAVE INTERIM STATUS
;STATE AUTHORIZATION AND REGULATION OF RADIOACTIVE MIXED WASTES
STATE PROGRAM ADVISORY 02 - RCRA AUTHORIZATION TO REGULATE MIXED WASTE
USE OF PETROLEUM-CONTAMINATED SOILS AS AN INGREDIENT IN ASPHALT BATCHING
. Protective Filers
* INTERIM STATUS PART A APPLICATION WITHDRAWL
LAND DISPOSAL OF UNTREATED HAZARDOUS WASTE
REYNOLDS METALS COMPANY INCINERATOR , ;
INVENTORY
.(See Federal Facilities)
IRON FOUNDRY WASTE
(See Listed Hazardous Waste) :
JRON SPONGE
(See Hazardous Waste Identification)
JOINT PERMITTING
- (See State Authorization)
:K-WASTES
(See Listed Hazardous Waste)
LABORATORY ANALYSIS
(See Analytic Methods)
LABORATORY WASTES
*LAB EXCLUSION, APPLICATION OF
*LAB SAMPLE
'LABORATORY AUDIT INSPECTION
TESTING FOR DIOXIN
BIF RULE
9B22:
SS21.
9528,
9551.
9551.
9528.
9528.
9528.
9498.
9528.
9528.
9528,
9528.
9494.
9528.
9528.
9542.
9541.
9541.
9493.
1986 (OSn)
il!987'(04)
l,987iC05)
1988(06)
1987;(10)
ili986;(09)
1994 ,(05.)
il9B7;(12)
1986(10)
1989(13)
199i:(03)
1986<01)
1991(02)
1987(14)
1980(01)
1987(04)
00-6
1991(02)
12/31/84
05/30/86
07/30/86
01/30/87
02/28/87
04/19/88
09/03/87
10/27/86
07/14/94
09/18/87
11/13/86
10/15/89
08/19/91
02/09/86
02/27/91
11/12/87
10/03/80
06/29/87
07/30/87
06/20/91
9453.1991(01) 06/01/91
9551.1990(04) 10/03/90
9523.1986(04) 10/27/86
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
9441.1984(22)
9441.1985(12a)
9431. 1987 (O
9441 . 1985 (
/ /
07/31/84
04/30/85
07/30/87
03/30/85
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 71
•SAMPLE EXCLUSION
CONTINUED LANDFILL DISPOSAL OF LAB PACKS
DIOXIN-CONTAINING LABORATORY WASTE WITH RADIOACTIVE PROPERTIES
LABORATORIES, RCRA REGULATION IMPACT
LABORATORY WASTE EXCLUSION
LABORATORY WASTES (INCLUDING CARCASSES, BEDDING, CAGES) CONTAINING DIOXIN
LDR RULES REGARDING ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR LAB PACKS
PROPER DISPOSAL OF SILVER NITRATE AND CHLOROFORM AS LABORATORY CHEMICALS
REGULATION AND PERMITTING OF LABORATORIES
REGULATORY STATUS OF LABORATORY WASTEWATER
SEDIMENT SAMPLE DISPOSAL
SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR REGULATIONS APPLICABILITY TO LABORATORIES
SPECIAL MATERIALS DISPOSED OF IN LANDFILLS: BATTERIES, CAPACITORS, LAB PACKS
TEST SAMPLES, EXCLUSION FROM HAZARDOUS WASTE
THIRD THIRD LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
THIRD THIRD LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS FINAL RULE
LAND BAN
(See Land Disposal Restrictions)
LAND DISPOSAL
(See Land Disposal Facilities)
LAND DISPOSAL BAN
(See Land Disposal Restrictions)
LAND DISPOSAL FACILITIES
(See also Closure Process, Post-Closure, Minimum Technological Requirements, Land Disposal Restrictions, Surface Impoundment)
'COMPLIANCE TO DETECTION GROUNDWATER MONITORING, CHANGE FROM
*GROUNDWATER MONITORING: ESTABLISHING BACKGROUND VALUES
"LINERS AND LEAK DETECTION SYSTEMS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE LANDFILLS, SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, AND WASTE PILES
*MULTISOURCE LEACHATE (F039) WASTE CODE AS IT APPLIES TO CONTAMINATION FROM SPILLS
*TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC WASTE PART B PERMIT APPLICATION DEADLINES
"TREATMENT SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS LOSING INTERIM STATUS BECAUSE OF NON-COMPLIANCE WITH GWM AND FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS
COMBINED NRC-EPA SITING GUIDELINES FOR DISPOSAL OF COMMERCIAL MIXED LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE AND HAZARDOUS WASTE
DENIAL OF RCRA OPERATING PERMITS
GRAY IRON FOUNDRY WASTE DISPOSAL
LAND DISPOSAL FACILITIES NOT ON A PERMITTING OR CLOSURE SCHEDULE
LAND DISPOSAL UNIT CLOSURE CLARIFICATION OF PROPOSED AND PROMULGATED RULES
LOSS OF FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY COVERAGE ON INTERIM STATUS AND PERMIT ISSUANCE
PHYSICAL COMPLIANCE IN GROUNDWATER MONITORING, DEFINITION
POST-CLOSURE PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS FOR NON-REGULATED UNITS
RCRA 3001 (f) (2) (b) AND STATES' EXCLUSION OF WASTES FROM REGULATION AS HAZARDOUS
RCRA FACILITY ASSESSMENTS, IMPLEMENTATION
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
VERTICAL EXPANSION AT U.S. ECOLOGY'S TRENCH 10, BEATTY, NEVADA FACILITY
VULNERABLE HYDROGEOLOGY GUIDANCE CRITERIA
Gas Condensate
LANDFILL GAS CONDENSATE, REGULATION OF
Geologic Repositories
PERMITS FOR PLACEMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN UNDERGROUND SALT MINES
9441
9487
9441
9441
9441
9444
9554
9441
9441
9441
9441
9441
9487
9431
9551
9551
1990(13e)
1985(02)
1985(26)
1990(32)
1985(03)
1986(30)
,1990(13)
,1993(01)
,1988(39)
,1992(01)
,1989(12)
.1985(34)
.1986(13)
.1989(03)
.1990(15)
.1991(13)
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
9481.
9481.
9484.
9444.
9501.
9470.
9480.
9523.
9486.
9501.
9476.
9528.
9481.
9476.
9433.
9502.
9523.
9487.
9481,
1985(06)
1986(04)
1992(01)
1991(06)
1990(01)
1985(01)
00-14
00-11
1981(01)
1987(01)
1985(05)
1985(09)
1985(04)
1985(04)
1986(09)
00-4
00-14
00-9
1987(03)
05/31/90
05/10/85
07/05/85
11/28/90
07/31/85
12/10/86
11/20/90
02/23/93
08/30/88
01/15/92
03/31/89
10/31/85
12/31/86
06/05/89
12/20/90
12/20/91
9441.1985(01)
9472.1986(04)
12/30/85
07/30/86
07/31/92
11/01/91
07/31/90
02/28/85
03/13/87
12/10/86
06/18/81
09/17/87
12/13/85
11/27/85
10/30/85
09/25/85
04/16/86
08/21/86
03/14/86
02/10/88
06/03/87
01/11/85
06/04/86
-------
"" """I!
!!! «IiB ill1
1)1
EB!Mi
a£*
:
li
*--==ji =if if'H? =^i* *i, = * -I-KI- = - ^--,, fi --_ =^h== ;|
MIM it 21 ft!-
— .i-
*a f,j;
f"-_i== t1
= ?*"- = "
S
i
r
1
07/S2/96r
! MJJI
: - - T I Ui i
i Land Dispoaal
1!
51
i=5
= *
7= _
If
I
!!
sag
;:w
if
!i i
---J -
*r
|E.
=:« _
;GH
KEVWOBD
i 1
t (
•LAND DISPOSALsRBSTRJCT^ONS3^;!STORAGE OF iHAZARDOUS HASTED
i :*LOSS OF INTERIM STATUS'!- LAND DISPOSAL FACILITIES • |
ABOVE-GROUND LAND EMPLACEMENT FACILITIES, N.J. LAW
1 CLARIFICATION OF "ACTIVE MANAGEMENT" IN CLOSING WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES (SURFACE -IMPOUNDMENTS)
: COPPER PLATING SOLUTION REACTED WITH A CHELATING AGENT TO PRODUCE A COMMERCT" «"»•-"-*•"">'
EFFECT OF LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS ON PERMITS
EFFECTS OF THE SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR RULE ON VARIOUS GENERATOR WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
EXEMPTION FOR COMMERCIAL FERTILIZERS ONCE THE FERTILIZER IS PRODUCED
HSWA MINIMUM TECH REQUIREMENTS FOR LINERS AND LEACHATE COLLECTION SYSTEMS
INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISPOSAL IN PROXIMITY TO WETLANDS
INTERPRETATION OF 40 CFR 268.7 REQUIREMENTS
! LAND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTES - USE OF NUCLEAR TEST SITES
LAND DISPOSAL PERMIT STRATEGY
UNER/LEACHATE COLLECTION SYSTEM COMPATIBILITY
LOSS OF INTERIM STATUS FROM NEWLY IDENTIFIED TC WASTES
MIXED WASTE DISPOSAL FROM RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS
POST-CLOSURE PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS FOR NON-REGULATED UNITS
POTENTIAL LIABILITY OF DISPOSAL FACILITIES WHEN DISPOSING OF CONTAMINATED DEBRIS
RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION PROCEDURES AND AUTHORITIES
RECYCLED CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE SLUDGES
REGULATORY STATUS OF SHELL OIL'S NORCO, LOUISIANA FACILITY DITCH SYSTEM
1 WASTE ACID AS WASTEWATER CONDITIONER AND AS INGREDIENT IN FERTILIZER
Land Treatment
*LAND TREATMENT
*WASTE STORAGE IN A WASTE PILE
BULK LIQUIDS AND DRAIN/LEACHING FIELDS
CLARIFICATION OF "ACTIVE MANAGEMENT" IN CLOSING WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES
CLARIFICATION ON DISPOSAL OF SORBED MATERIALS IN HAZARDOUS WASTE LANDFILLS ,
CLOSURE STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE LAND TREATMENT UNITS
DEGRADATION, TRANSFORMATION OR IMMOBILIZATION IN TREATMENT ZONE
DRAINAGE WATER BENEATH LAND TREATMENT UNITS AT OIL REFINERIES
INITIAL SOIL SURFACE TERM DEFINED IN LAND TREATMENT REGULATIONS
LAND TREATMENT UNITS, DEPTH TO WATER TABLE REQUIRMENT
LEACHATE AND PRECIPITATION RUN-OFF AT LFs, WASTE PILES, AND LT UNITS, HAZARDOUS WASTE FROM MIXTURE OF
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR AMOCO REFINERY
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR ARCO PRODUCTS, WA
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR ATLANTIC REFINING & MARKETING, PA
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR CONOCO, MT
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR EXXON, TX
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR KERR-MCGEE REFINING, OK
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR KOCH REFINING, TX
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR KOCH'S REFINING, TX
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR MARATHON PETROLEUM, IL
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR ROBINSON, IL
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR SHELL OIL, WA
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR SINCLAIR OIL, OK
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR STAR ENTERPRISE, DE
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR SUN REFINING, OK
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR TEXACO, WA
POSTPONEMENT OF A LAND TREATMENT DEMONSTRATION FOR NAVAJO REFINING CO., ARTESIA, NM
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS/LAND TREATMENT UNITS REGULATION IF ASSOCIATED WWT SLUDGES ARE LISTED
!1]
: -,\ ,;";; ": |..-u-i^i :, v *«, i = .. "-. " ":~.
• ~; s.-p i^: j XJM; «;>! >> ;;:; ".;>; ;-«
,, : ' ; , , „ v •_-"*"-'
!^= ir= - = =
RFACE -IMPOUNDMENTS) - =
FERTILIZER' - - == = -
J
ENT PRACTICES
-
~ ~~ -
_
~
_~
S
-
RFACE IMPOUNDMENTS)- -- - —
ON POZZOLANIC STABILIZATION OF SORBED MATERIALS v
~
WASTE FROM MIXTURE OF
- -
_
- i- - - ?
-~
, NM . .; : ; - ; -+
U 1 fa
: 5 ~ —
&RE LISTED i * ! : ; B
Page Bo. 72
nil Pii! ""i in n m
-" - = ~-i. r ;
; --'-i f- -. ::: -:
9551.1987(05!)
9528,198St03!) «
9487,1986(04) "
9484.1994(01:) -.
9493,1986(01!) 1
9551.1986(15:) :
9451.1986(01) '
9493.1986(03!) .
9480.1985(01i) 1
9551.1990(01) "
9554.1988(03:1 !
9480.1984(01!) i
9501.1982(02!) ?
9487.1986(10!) =
9528.1990(02,1 :
9554.1988(041) "
9521.1985(01)
9477.1993(101)
9502.1986002) '_
,9441.1985(39) ',
9432. 1994 C01) '
9441.1986(80)
9486. 1987 fOl) •
9485.1984(01) !
9487.1986(09) 4
9484.1994(01) -
-•_ 19487.1993(01) i
9476.1991(01) (
9486.1990(01) :
9486.1988(01) !
9486.1988(02) i
9486.1986(03) !
9441.1984(37) '
9551.1990(13) ,
9551.1990(08) i
9551.1991(06) (
—9 5 5 1-.-139 1-( 0 9 H
9551.1991(03) s
9551.1991(05) -
9551.1991(12) '
9551.1991(01)
9551.1990(09) :
9551.1991(14) J
9551.1990(11)
9551.1990(12) ,
9551.1990(10) !
9551.1991(02) S
9551.1991(08)
9524.1989(03) j
9523.00-12 t
9523.00-15 j
9480.1985(02) <
•
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 73
Landfill
•EXISTING UNITS AND MINIMUM TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS
•HAZARDOUS WASTE TANK CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE
•LANDFILLS WITH EP TOXIC LEACHATE, REGULATION OF
•NON-HAZARDOUS LIQUIDS BAN
ABOVE-GROUND LAND EMPLACEMENT FACILITIES, N.J. LAW
ABSORBENTS FOR CONTAINERIZED LIQUID HAZARDOUS WASTES, USE OF
BAN ON DISPOSAL OF LIQUIDS IN LANDFILLS
BAN ON USE OF LIQUIDS IN LANDFILLS
BULK LIQUID HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLIDIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
BULK LIQUIDS AND DRAIN/LEACHING FIELDS
CLARIFICATION ON DISPOSAL OF SORBED MATERIALS IN HAZARDOUS WASTE LANDFILLS AND ON POZZOLANIC STABILIZATION OF SORBED MATERIALS
CLOSURE PLAN FOR THE HAZARDOUS WASTE STORAGE UNITS AT VERTAC'S SHUTDOWN MANUFACTURING PLANT
CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
CONTAINERIZED AND BULK HAZARDOUS LIQUIDS IN RCRA LANDFILLS
CONTINUED LANDFILL DISPOSAL OF LAB PACKS
DRY TOLUENE AND CARBON TETRACHLORIDE, SAFE DISPOSAL OF •
EXCLUSION FROM REGULATION FOR CHARACTERISTIC AND LISTED WASTES - LEACHATE LEVELS
LAND DISPOSAL UNIT CLOSURE CLARIFICATION OF PROPOSED AND PROMULGATED RULES
LEACHATE AND PRECIPITATION RUN-OFF AT LFs, WASTE PILES, AND LT UNITS, HAZARDOUS WASTE FROM MIXTURE OF
LINER/LEACHATE COLLECTION SYSTEM COMPATIBILITY
LIQUID HAZARDOUS WASTES IN LANDFILLS
PCB-CONTAMINATED WASTES, STABILIZATION OF
POST-CLOSURE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS (ARMCO STEEL)
PROHIBITION ON PLACING LIQUIDS IN LANDFILL
PROHIBITION ON THE PLACEMENT OF BULK LIQUID HAZARDOUS WASTE IN LANDFILLS - STATUTORY INTERPRETIVE GUIDANCE
REDESIGNATION OF SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS AS LANDFILLS DURING INTERIM STATUS
RESIDUES FROM MUNICIPAL WASTE RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITIES
SAMPLING PLAN FOR DELISTING PETITION FOR WASTES IN LANDFILL TRENCHES
SPECIAL MATERIALS DISPOSED OF IN LANDFILLS: BATTERIES, CAPACITORS, LAB PACKS
STANDARDS AGAINST WHICH 3004 (o) (2) EQUIVALENCY PETITION SHOULD BE COMPARED - DOUBLE LINER
SUBSURFACE FATE AND TRANSPORT MODEL
SUMMARY OF ASSISTANCE BRANCH PERMITTING COMMENTS
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
TEL GASOLINE SLUDGE DISPOSAL
Landfill Gas
GASEOUS EMISSIONS FROM LANDFILLS
Waste Piles
•CLEAN CLOSURE OF INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT AND WASTE PILE
•WASTE PILE LINERS - MTR (264.251)
•WASTE STORAGE IN A WASTE PILE
ADJACENT WASTE PILES INTO REGULATED SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT, PLACEMENT OF (CIBA-GEIGY)
INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS & CLEAN CLOSED WASTE PILES, CODIFICATION RULE 12/01/87
LEACHATE AND PRECIPITATION RUN-OFF AT LFs, WASTE PILES, AND LT UNITS, HAZARDOUS WASTE FROM MIXTURE OF
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
THREE AND FOUR-SIDED, FLOORED STRUCTURES, REGULATORY CLASSIFICATION OF
WASTE PILES AND POST-CLOSURE PERMITS, APPLICATION OF NOVEMBER 1988 DEADLINE TO
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
•CHANGES TO INTERIM STATUS TANK FACILITIES
•EMPTY CONTAINERS
•LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTION
•LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS DEFINITIONS
9487.1986(14)
9476.1986(02)
9487.1984 (04)
9487.1985(06)
9487.1986(04)
9487.1985(05)
9487.1985(03)
9487.1986(07)
9487.1987(01)
9487.1986(09)
9487.1993(01)
9488.1987(01)
9476.00-12
9487.1986(12)
9487.1985(02)
9451.1986(06)
9441.1986(03)
9476.1985(05)
9441.1984(37)
9487.1986(10)
9487.1985(04)
9487.1988(01)
9522.1986(03)
9487.1985(10)
9487.00-2A
9528.1988(02)
9487.1986(08)
9433.1986(21)
9487.1986(13)
9487.1986(11)
9431.1991(01)
9523.00-17
9523.00-12
9553.1989(01)
9487.1986(03)
9522.1988(01)
9485.1985(01)
9485.1984(01)
9484.1987(06)
9522.1988(05)
9441.1984(37)
9523.00-12
9432.1987(02)
9501.1985(01)
XREF
9483.1988(16)
9441.1986(98)
9541.1987(10)
9551.1986(23)
12/30/86
09/30/86
08/30/84
09/30/85
03/26/86
09/20/85
05/29/85
04/27/86
01/20/87
06/12/86
10/15/93
02/09/87
02/02/88
12/30/86
05/10/85
12/15/86
01/07/86
12/13/85
11/14/84
08/07/86
08/07/85
02/03/88
11/20/86
12/05/85
06/11/86
05/11/88
05/27/86
12/13/86
12/31/86
12/04/86
03/26/91
09/02/88
03/30/87
07/28/89
03/06/86
02/28/88
03/30/85
11/30/84
06/26/87
11/30/88
11/14/84
03/30/87
04/02/87
10/01/85
/ /
09/30/88
12/31/86
12/30/87
12/30/86
-------
• I
! i I !
07/02/96
KEYWORD TMOBX
Page Ho, 74
•PROHIBITION OH STORAGE OF RESTRICTED HASTES
.APPLICABILITY OF "SUPERPUND LOR GUIDES"
APPLICABILITY OF LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS TO'THB- HASTE: CODE CARRY THROUGH PRINCIPLE
(CLARIFICATION OF CERTAIN ASPECTS OF 40 CFR 268IDBBRIS REGULATIONS
^CLARIFICATION OF NEWLY LISTED HASTES AND HAZARDOUS DEBRIS
IjCONOCO PART B PERMITS ; ; ,; ;
I'LAB PACKS - LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS ASPECTS ! ! :i ;
:^LAND BAN ISSUES - 1988 UPDATE .,. 1
=LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS APPLIED TO EXPORTED WASTES :
fLAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS CLARIFICATIONS • , ;
;iLAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS EFFECT ON PERMITS ' ; i '= M
;hLAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS WASTE IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR ORGANIC HAZARDOUS HASTES;
;;LEAD SHEILDING FOR RADIOACTIVE WASTE IS A RCRA SOLID WASTE
^PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR DISPOSAL IN SALT DOMES ;
^PERSONAL PROTECTIVE GEAR DISPOSAL
JRCRA POLICY STATEMENT: LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS' DILUTION PROHIBITION AND COMBUSTION opiaNORGANic METAL-BEARING HAZARDOUS WASTES
RECYCLABLE MATERIALS WHERE PRECIOUS METALS ARE RECLAIMED
REGULATIONS FOR DISPOSAL OF CERAMIC MATERIALS
,:SHAM INCINERATION AND TREATMENT OF K048-K052 WASTES IN CEMENT KILNS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES
BOAT
•REINJECTED GROUNDWATER RESULTING FROM CORRECTIVE ACTION TREATMENT = ! '.-.'_
•TREATMENT STANDARDS - BOAT ' " !
APPLICABLE LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS TO REINJECTION OF TREATED CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER UNDER CERCLA AND RCRA CORRECTIVE; ACTIONS
CLARIFICATION ON THE APPLICABILITY OF THE DEBRIS STANDARDS TO P078 WASTES
DETERMINATION OF EQUIVALENT TREATMENT (DET) FOR 8 OF THE WASTE CODES FROM A TOLUENE DIISOCYANATE (TDI) TREATABILITY GROUP
DETERMINATION OF EQUIVALENT TREATMENT FOR METAL RECOVERY • '.
PLACEMENT OF STABILIZED WASTES THAT DO NOT MEET LAND RESTRICTION REQUIREMENTS
PROPOSED BEST DEMONSTRATED AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY (BOAT) FOR K061 WASTE
TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT FOR BOAT . ''
TEL GASOLINE SLUDGE DISPOSAL
TREATMENT STANDARD FOR K106 (LOW MERCURY SUBCATEGORY) NON-WASTEHATER RESIDUES FROM RETORTING/ROASTING (RMERC) UNITS
Bulk Liquids
•STORAGE PRIOR TO RECYCLING ;
APPLICABILITY OF THE PAINT FILTER LIQUIDS TEST TO SORBENTS !
BULK LIQUID HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLIDIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
CLARIFICATION ON DISPOSAL OF SORBED MATERIALS IN HAZARDOUS WASTE LANDFILLS AND ON POZZOLANIC STABILIZATION OF SORBED MATERIALS
CONTAINERIZED AND BULK HAZARDOUS LIQUIDS IN RCRA LANDFILLS
DISPOSAL OF SORBED LIQUIDS, PARTICULARLY "BIODEGRADABLE" SORBENTS IN WASTES DESTINED FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE LANDFILLS
PCB-CONTAMINATED WASTES, STABILIZATION OF
PROHIBITION ON PLACING LIQUIDS IN LANDFILL
PROHIBITION ON THE PLACEMENT OF BULK LIQUID HAZARDOUS WASTE IN LANDFILLS - STATUTORY INTERPRETIVE GUIDANCE
REGULATORY STATUS AND MANAGEMENT OF LIQUIDS AND ABSORBENT MATERIALS CONTAINING LIQUIDS
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
California List
•CALIFORNIA LIST
•LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - CALIFORNIA LIST
•LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - CALIFORNIA LIST
•LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - HALOGENATED ORGANIC CARBONS
•LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - POINT OF GENERATION
•MIXED HASTE AND LAND BAN
APPROPRIATE TREATMENT METHODS FOR ELEMENTAL MERCURY
CALIFORNIA LIST HOC LAND BAN REGULATIONS
CALIFORNIA LIST LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS ARE APPLICABLE TO LIQUID WASTES
OATORNIA LIST LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS, EPA'3 IMPLEMENTATION OF
94531. 1986 (06)
9551!. 1991(15)
. 95511.1993(03) i
; 955ll,l!994 (01) i
9554!.ll992(01) '
i 95531.1990(01) •
i 9S5lJ. 1J990 (02) >
, 9551. Ii988(08) >
• 955l).li991(07) i
95511. 1387 (01) '
, 9522|.00-1 i
:955l.l994 (02) >
9444:. 1991(02) '
• ;9489l.l991(05) \
:944i:.1990(15):
! ;9551|. 01-01 i
355l.1989.C03);
1 9441i.l992>(22) •
; :9494;.1991(02) 1
i9554,.199l!(03) \
i 9554!. 1986 (04):
95541. 1989'(05) '
9554'.1994i(01):!
9554;.1994i(06) -
. 9554!. 19921(02) •
?554i.l989;(02)
. 19441. 19881(06)
- i9553i.l986i(04) (
i9553;.1989i(01) '.
3554i.l994!(04) >
i 19475Ll987:(01) ;
1 194431. 19931(06) :
- 9487:. 1987i(01) ;
9487i.l993;(01) :
: 9487i.l986!(12) •
! 9551!. 1993|(02) !
— 9487%1988l(01K
9487M985i(10) =
' 9487:.00-2A ;
', 955^.1993(04)!
9523-. 00-14
1 | 1
9554:.1987(03) ;
9551.1987(09) ;
9553;. 1987 (13a)
! 9553!. 1987 (13)
95541.1989(03)
; 9551.1989(02)
: 95531.1987(16)
i 95541.1989(04)
1 95531.1987(09)
9553;. 1987(^^^
11/30/86
01/07/91
08/18/93
10/06/94
11/05/92
05/11/90
08/08/90
06/16/88
04/23/91
01/20/87
09/15/87
12/05/94
04/30/91
02/22/91
06/14/90
05/23/94
12/20/89
07/21/92
03/29/91
04/01/91
12/30/86
12/20/89
01/04/94
10/24/94
12/04/92
05/05/89
03/09/88
12/30/86
07/28/89
07/14/94
04/30/87
10/12/93
01/20/87
10/15/93
12/30/86
05/05/93
02/03/88
12/05/85
06/11/86
11/17/93
03/14/86
07/30/87
03/30/87
09/30/87
09/30/87
10/30/89
03/30/89
11/18/87
11/28/89
09/18/87
10/15/87
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 75
CALIFORNIA LIST PROHIBITIONS APPLICABILITY AFTER THIRD THIRD RULE
COMPLIANCE WITH CALIFORNIA LIST FINAL RULE
HAZARDOUS WASTES CONTAINING HALOGENATED ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (HOCs)
PAINT FILTER LIQUIDS TEST USED TO DETERMINE COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA LIST RESTRICTIONS
RESTRICTED WASTE DEFINITION
SOLIDIFICATION OF CALIFORNIA LIST LIQUID WASTES AND THE DILUTION PROHIBITION
TESTING REQUIREMENTS AND SOLIDIFICATION ISSUES UNDER LAND DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
Case-by-Case Extension
*FLUORESCENT LIGHT BULBS AS DEBRIS
"LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTION, DIOXINS, AND 90-DAY ACCUMULATION
*SOIL CASE-BY-CASE EXTENSION
CASE-BY-CASE EXTENSION PETITION, INFORMATION REQUIRED
CASE-BY-CASE EXTENSION UNDER THE LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS, INFORMATION REQUIRED
EXTENSION OF APPLICABLE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
EXTENSIONS TO STORAGE PROHIBITION AND LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
GENERATOR REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION FROM OR EXTENSION OF LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
HAZARDOUS DEBRIS CASE-BY-CASE CAPACITY VARIANCE RENEWAL
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS FOR SOLVENTS AND DIOXINS, EXEMPTIONS TO
SOLVENT-CONTAINING WASTE SOLIDIFIED WITH VERMICULITE
Free Liquids
*LIQUIDS AND FREE LIQUIDS, DEFINITION OF
*THE LIQUIDS IN LANDFILLS PROHIBITION AND SORBED FREE LIQUIDS
BAN ON USE OF LIQUIDS IN LANDFILLS
BULK LIQUIDS AND DRAIN/LEACHING FIELDS
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF TREATED WASTES - USE OF SW-846 METHODS, WASTE IDENTIFICATION
CONTAINERIZED AND BULK HAZARDOUS LIQUIDS IN RCRA LANDFILLS
LIQUID WASTE, DEFINITION OF
PAINT FILTER LIQUIDS TEST USED TO DETERMINE COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA LIST RESTRICTIONS
PERFORMANCE AND PERMITTING STANDARDS IN 3004 (b) , PROHIBITION OF PLACEMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN SALT DOMES
REGULATORY STATUS AND MANAGEMENT OF LIQUIDS AND ABSORBENT MATERIALS CONTAINING LIQUIDS
SOLIDIFICATION OF CALIFORNIA LIST LIQUID WASTES AND THE DILUTION PROHIBITION
WASTE AS LIQUID OR SOLID, DETERMINATION OF
Land Disposal Ban
*LAND DISPOSAL BAN - TRACES OF NATURALLY OCCURRING BENZENE AND TOLUENE
*LAND DISPOSAL BAN OF SOLVENTS
*LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - SOLVENT AND DIOXIN WASTES
*NON-HAZARDOUS LIQUIDS BAN
"ONE-TIME NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT UNDER 268.7(a)(6)
"STORAGE OF RESTRICTED WASTES
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS TO CERCLA RESPONSE ACTIONS
APPROPRIATE TREATMENT METHODS FOR ELEMENTAL MERCURY
DRY CLEANING CARTRIDGE FILTERS, DISPOSAL OF
LAND DISPOSAL PROHIBITION RULE FOR SOLVENTS
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS EFFECT ON STORAGE/DISPOSAL OF COMMERCIAL MIXED WASTE
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS ON THE METAL FINISHING INDUSTRY
PERMITTING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS AFFECTING COMPLIANCE WITH LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
RISK-BASED METHODOLOGIES ON LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
SMALL-VOLUME MIXED WASTE LABORATORY GENERATED MATERIALS AND LEAD
THERMAL TREATMENT UNITS, SCOPE OF SUBPART X
National Variance
*LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - 1% NATIONAL VARIANCE (SOLVENTS)
*LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - SOLVENT AND DIOXIN WASTES
*LDR REQUIREMENTS DURING NATIONAL CAPACITY VARIANCE
9551.1991(11)
9551.1987(21)
9551.1989(01)
9553.1987(15)
9551.1987(16)
9551.1987(23)
9551.1988(01)
9551.1992(02)
9551.1987(04)
9551.1993(01)
9551.1987(14)
9551.1986(11)
9551.1988(09)
9555.1987(01)
9551.1987(12)
9553.1993(01)
9553.1987(02)
9551.1987(06)
9432.1985(03)
9487.1995(01)
9487.1986(07)
9487.1986(09)
9445.1987(03a)
9487.1986(12)
9432.1981(01)
9553.1987(15)
9489.1985(01)
9551.1993(04)
9551.1987(23)
9445.1984(06)
9553.1986(02)
9551.1986(03)
9553.1988(01)
9487.1985(06)
9551.1992(01)
9551.1986(24)
9553.1989(02)
9553.1987(16)
9553.1986(03)
9553.1987(12)
9555.00-01
9554.1987(02)
9502.1986(11)
9551.1986(07)
9551.1988(07)
9489.1988(01)
9551.1987(24)
9553.1988(01)
9551.1990(16)
09/27/91
10/28/87
01/06/89
12/03/81
09/04/87
11/13/81
05/05/88
09/30/92
01/30/87
01/31/93
07/16/87
08/11/86
08/11/88
10/02/87
06/26/87
06/06/93
01/13/87
03/10/87
05/30/85
01/31/95
04/27/86
06/12/86
11/17/87
12/30/86
06/28/81
12/03/87
09/20/85
11/17/93
11/13/87
07/30/84
04/30/86
02/28/86
02/28/88
09/30/85
07/31/92
12/30/86
11/13/89
11/18/87
12/11/86
08/10/87
09/28/90
02/03/87
06/16/86
06/19/86
06/13/88
05/18/88
11/30/87
02/28/88
12/01/90
-------
!« "- V I' »!I12'!«: !!••!:!£«*«! .•« =-•'-? • *;'-'""II
'III (M! Ilplpi Ml! ;l! P!!i i
!l*d&L'iSS:| i^S^rii^ : :^!M r =:==.is3£ ? IS1" L £i ^f^: "/^" !i :i:-^-r-_^T _: nLJ ? ^if:Mi:ft
! I i«; :;.-=: ijp 5j iijgp • M i^ r= | :i li _j = l^rfriH m ,ff i « | ;E _ fc r: ;c - .-- r 3 si- --= : =;-;-= r .- '^i- , - -'.rf. - . -.f. « a ==-. 5 .-
,R ::; ti :j ;;:, SJ;^ 1 - SM i ;: ::.: :|s !aM::5 i " :,^;!.n
= i! B i : '!
: i! a i ; i
-OS/02/96 V"
i| - i
:; I m
-j I
lii
t ?
i!!
Mil
•I!
: ftl;
in jiii IP
KEYV0RD I»BX
I I
DIOXINS
B^, ..u«r...»B«.»i^ BAMi!-,(EFFBCTIVBiDATES;FOR!SOtVEHTS TiMC
i ;;i*IASBBSTOS/LBAD/SOIL/BEBRIS AS INORGANIC SOLID WBRIS ^
^iHULTI-SOURCE LEACHATE AND TREATMENT STANDARDS OF LAND DISPOSAt^RESTRICTIONS
i |g!NATIONAL CAPACITY VARIANCE FOR INORGANIC SOLIDS DEBRIS ? '- •• & , i
APPLICABILITY OF THE LESS-THAN-1% EXTENSION TO TREATMENT RESIDUALS ~ ' |! * ! Ml
^" PROCESS HASTEWATER FROM METAL DECREASING OPERATIONS ;
i |g|RESIDUALS FROM TREATMENT OF RESTRICTED HASTES NOT COVERED BY LESS-THAN-1% SOLVENT EXTENSION ' ' 8 ' ^ !
-iSOLVENT-BEARING WASTEWATER, SLUDGE, AND BRINE TREATED AND STORED IN SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
; >|jHASTES GENERATED IN MANUFACTURING PROCESS UNIT NOT SUBJECT TO LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS UNTIL REMOVED! =
No-Migration Variance
i i *LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS VARIANCES
! *LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS: DISPOSAL OF HASTES GRANTED A VARIANCE
CONCRETE LINERS FOR HAZARDOUS HASTE TANK SYSTEMS : i
' CONOCO'S NO-MIGRATION PETITION DENIAL * '
• DRAINAGE WATER BENEATH LAND TREATMENT UNITS - NO MIGRATION PETITIONS
!! DRAINAGE HATER BENEATH LAND TREATMENT UNITS AT OIL REFINERIES '
; LAND DISPOSAL OF UNTREATED HAZARDOUS HASTE
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR AMOCO REFINERY
•I NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR ARCO PRODUCTS, HA
.NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR CONOCO, MT "
! NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR EXXON, TX
li NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR KERR-MCGEE REFINING, OK
; i NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR KOCH REFINING, TX - '
, NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR KOCH'S REFINING, TX
: NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR MARATHON PETROLEUM, IL
!: NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR ROBINSON, IL
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR SHELL OIL, WA : ,
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR SINCLAIR OIL, OK :
; NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR STAR ENTERPRISE, DE '
•; NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR SUN REFINING, OK
; NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR TEXACO, WA
;: PLACEMENT OF STABILIZED HASTES THAT DO NOT MEET LAND RESTRICTION REQUIREMENTS
II STANDARDS FOR AIR PATHWAY FOR METALS AND ORGANIC CHEMICALS
^THE EFFECT OF AN UPCOMING RULE ON NONHAZARDOUS UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL HELLS AND ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION
Notification ]
•EXPORT OF RESTRICTED WASTE
•LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - CORROSIVE WASTE
•LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - MANIFEST REQUIREMENTS '•
•ONE-TIME NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT UNDER 268.7 (a)(6)
•SOFT HAMMER CERTIFICATIONS/DEMONSTRATIONS
n^n^CATION °F ™E LDR PHASE " REGULATION TWAT APPEARED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER ON SEPTEMBER 19
DISPOSAL FACILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS CERTIFICATION
INTERPRETATION OF 40 CFR 268.7 REQUIREMENTS
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS TESTING AND RECORD KEEPING REQUIREMENTS
NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT WHEN SHIPPING RESTRICTED WASTES TO A STORAGE FACILITY
ON-SITE TREATMENT OF MANHOLE SEDIMENT WHICH MAY EXCEED THE TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC FOR LEAD
RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS FOR SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS SUBJECT TO LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
SHAM RECYCLING POLICY AS IT PERTAINS TO THE BOILER AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACE RULE
THIRD THIRD LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS FINAL RULE
Treatment Standards
•AMENDMENTS TO PART 262 HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION AND RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS
•CALIFORNIA LIST
•CLASSIFICATION OF LEACHATE CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER
INITION OF FORMERLY BEVILL EXEMPT HASTE
.UNITS
9S51
9S51
9SS
'.1988(15) *
.1988(01) -:--
•.1990(04) »
,1990(13)„
.1990(08) S
.1991(09) if
.1991(03) *
.1991(05) s
.1991(12) '-:
.1991(01) ?
.1990(09) "
.1991(14) <
.1990(11) ;--
1990(12) =5
1990(10) "
1991(02) 3
1991(08) J
1989(02) a
1991(04) ^
1994(02) J
1994
9551
9551
9551.
'-'—9551.
9551.
9551.
9551.
9554.
9551.
9551.
9553.
9454.
9494.
9551.
.1987(22)
.1987(19)
.1988(04)
.1992(01)
.1988(13)
.1995(01)
.1987(07)
.1988(03)
.1988(03)
.1987(20)
.1994(01)
.1994(01)
.1994(03)
1991(13)
Ho. 76
12/30/86
12/11/90
07/31/90
10/14/90
07/16/87
03/08/88
04/27/87
01/12/87
06/29/87
10/30/86
05/30/88
03/16/88
09/24/90
01/21/88
01/02/88
10/03/90
11/08/90
10/24/90
05/29/91
01/29/91
02/05/91
12/10/91
01/03/91
11/06/90
05/01/91
11/07/90
11/08/90
11/07/90
01/17/91
05/29/91
05/05/89
01/30/91
01/05/94
i 10/31/87
fr 09/30/87
3 05/30/88
f 01/31/92
tj 11/30/88
K 02/10/95
8 03/10/87
E 05/13/88
j 05/13/88
f_ 10/28/87
"• 06/23/94
It 05/09/94
^ 06/07/94
• 12/20/91
*^^IN]
,9451.1991(02)
*9554.1987(03)
9554.1991(02
9441.1995(
m
03/01/91
07/30/87
01/01/91
03/31/95
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No.
'DILUTION OF LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTED WASTE
'DILUTION TO MEET TREATMENT STANDARDS
*F001-F005 WASTEWATER DEFINITION
*LAB PACKS - LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
*LAND DISPOSAL PROHIBITION
*LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - FIRST THIRD
*LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - HALOGENATED ORGANIC CARBONS
*METHANOL TREATMENT STANDARDS
*POINT OF GENERATION - LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
*PRETREATMENT OF CHARACTERISTIC WASTES SUBJECT TO LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
*SOFT HAMMER CERTIFICATIONS/DEMONSTRATIONS
*SW-846 TEST METHODS
*THE LIQUIDS IN LANDFILLS PROHIBITION AND SORBED FREE LIQUIDS
*TREATED WASTES - MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS
AUTHORIZATION OF STATE PROGRAMS TO IMPLEMENT LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS PROGRAMS
BIAS CORRECTION APPLIED TO THE TCLP
CADMIUM WASTES FROM MILITARY COATING MATERIALS
CALIFORNIA LIST HOC LAND BAN REGULATIONS
rPRTTFTCATTON/NOTIFICATION FOR MULTIPLE-CONSTITUENT WASTES SUBJECT TO LDRs
™FICATION OF THE LDR PHASE II REGULATION THAT APPEARED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER ON SEPTEMBER 19, 1994
CLARIFICATION OF THE RCRA "CONTAINED-IN" POLICY
S.'S^CSS^1S?^,'^riSoS SEINED FOR RECYCLING,. AND TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR CFC
CONTAMINATED SOIL AND DEBRIS TREATED REPLACEMENT UNDER A TREATABILITY VARIANCE
SSpSS!^™^ ««• CODES FROM A TOLUENE DIISOCYANATE «™I, TREATABILITY CROUP
^TERMINATION ON THE LEGALITY AND APPROPRIATENESS OF USING INCINERATION FOR TWO P078 WASTE STREAMS
F024 REVISED TREATMENT STANDARDS
BE REASONABLY EXPECTED TO BE PRESENT" FOR SOIL THAT EXHIBITS THE TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC
K001 P093, AND U059 CONTAMINATED SOIL TREATMENT STANDARDS
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS HEARING ON FEB 24, 1986 RESPONSES
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS REGULATION OF CYANIDES
LDR DETERMINATION OF WASTE STREAM DILUTION
LDR RULES REGARDING ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR LAB PACKS
LEAD AND ARSENIC WASTES TREATMENT STANDARDS
LEAD-BEARING WASTES TREATMENT STANDARDS
LEADED PAINT SANDBLASTING WASTE TESTING USING TCLP
MULTI-SOURCE LEACHATE AND TREATMENT STANDARDS OF LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR ATLANTIC REFINING & MARKETING, PA
RECYCLING OF K061 AS AN INGREDIENT IN CEMENT
^ZT^PPL^^^^^ THROUGH PHASE SEPARATE AT A LICENSED TSDF
R!™ TO SPECIFIC QUESTIONS REGARDS HAZARDOUS WASTE IDENTIFICATION AND GENERATOR REGULATIONS
SHAM RECYCLING POLICY AS IT PERTAINS TO THE BOILER AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACE RULE
SLUDGE CONTAINING 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE (TCE)
SOLVENT LISTINGS AND LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
qimMARTNF REACTOR COMPARTMENTS - LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
9551.1988(02)
9554.1986(05)
9441.1990(18)
9554.1990(01)
9551.1986(08)
9551.1988(10)
9553.1987(13)
9554.1990(04)
9554.1990(12)
9551.1990(03)
9551.1988(13)
9554.1991(04)
9487.1995(01)
9554.1986(03)
9433.1986(24)
9554.1994(03)
9441.1994(14)
9554.1989(05)
9541.1986(13)
9442.1990(02)
9441.1990(11)
9554.1989(04)
9551.1991(10)
9551.1995(01)
9441.1995(32)
9554.1994 (01)
9441.1994(26)
9551.1990(05)
9554.1990(02)
9554.1994(06)
9554.1994(05)
9554.1990(05)
9551.1988(12)
9554.1995(01)
9554.1990(09)
9554.1986(01)
9554.1991(01)
9551.1990(06)
9554.1990(13)
9554.1990(11)
9554.1990(06)
9442.1991(01)
9554.1990(08)
9551.1991(06)
9441.1990(03)
9521.1994(01)
9441.1994(27)
9452.1993(03)
9494.1994(03)
9551.1987(13)
9444.1987(18)
9554.1990(07)
9554.1990(15)
9554.1994(02)
9554.1993(02)
9525.1990(02)
9554.1994(04)
05/30/88
12/30/86
06/30/90
01/30/90
07/30/86
09/30/88
09/30/87
03/07/90
08/30/90
09/30/90
11/30/88
12/01/91
01/31/95
12/30/86
12/30/86
02/16/94
06/09/94
12/20/89
06/24/86
11/08/90
04/12/90
11/28/89
06/05/91
02/10/95
09/15/95
01/04/94
09/28/94
10/09/90
02/22/90
10/24/94
07/26/94
06/25/90
11/04/88
06/14/95
08/13/90
03/27/86
01/08/91
10/14/90
11/20/90
08/24/90
06/25/90
01/08/91
07/31/90
04/22/91
02/13/90
10/17/94
10/04/94
10/20/93
06/07/94
06/26/87
05/20/87
07/30/90
09/26/90
01/05/94
11/18/93
10/17/90
07/14/94
-------
' I- I ?'!«8'*i-i™ I • i • K »r'
ll!
t Bf J!:,«l«i~n- , F!| RBI •«!«;«; I •>•,]»;• 1 !' !i eii-n fill
: i1!!!! *:: Mi 1 » 5 i
s : :a 8 1 I
TREATMENT STANDARDS AND THE SEVILLE EXCLUSION - i "- * : _:^ :. , :? 1 L ..
TREATOENT STANDARDS POR CERTAIN MIXED RADIOACTIVE HASTES ;" \, ": f\^: : ! , ,
USE OF ON-SITE PRECIPITATION PROCESS AS AN ACCEPTABLE PRETREATMENT STEP ADJUNCT: TO MERCURY RETORTING
VOLUNTARY TREATMENT PRIOR TO LAND DISPOSAL • S ,
HASTE ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS IN INCOMING HASTE SHIPMENTS - LDR : ' !i I ' '•
HASTE CODES AND TREATMENT RESIDUES
HASTE TREATMENT FACILITIES ACCEPTING F006 ELECTROPLATING WASTES i t ;; )
n;:: ; :B
Pag* Ho. 78
LAND TREATMENT
(See Land Disposal Facilities)
LANDFILL
(See Land Disposal Facilities) ' "
LANDFILL GAS "
(See Land Disposal Facilities)
LARGE VOLUME WASTE
(See Mining Waste) !
LEACHATE
(See also Appendix VIII) ;
*CLASSIFICATION OF LEACHATE CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER
*MULTISOURCE LEACHATB (F039) WASTE CODE AS IT APPLIES TO CONTAMINATION FROM SPILLS
•TREATMENT TANKS FOR LEACHATE OR LIQUID WASTES
DELISTING CRITERIA/LEACHATE LEVELS
DETECTION LIMIT FOR EP-LEACHATE CONCENTRATION OF SELENIUM
EXCLUSION FROM REGULATION FOR CHARACTERISTIC AND LISTED WASTES - LEACHATE LEVELS
GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATED WITH HAZARDOUS WASTE LEACHATE "
INTERPRETATION OF INDUSTRIAL WASTEHATER DISCHARGE EXCLUSION FROM THE DEFINITION OF SOLID WASTE
LEACHATE AND PRECIPITATION RUN-OFF AT LFs, WASTE PILES, AND LT UNITS, HAZARDOUS WASTE FROM MIXTURE OF
LEACHATE FROM A MUNICIPAL LANDFILL, REGULATION OF
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT RECEIVING LEACHATE, REGULATION OF
LEACHATE COLLECTION/DETECTION SYSTEM
(See Minimum Technological Requirements)
LEAD
(See Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
LEAK DETECTION
(See Secondary Containment)
LEAKAGE
(See Secondary Containment)
I, OS/23/30
9554,1:990 (04) 12/27/90
__ 9554.1993(01) 06/03/93
= 95S3vlJ987(;03i) I 01/20/87
9551T1987010)' 06/12/87
9554.19901,03} < 03/07/90
9554 .198'8 ('OS) ' 08/11/88
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF -
9554.1991(02)
9444.1991(06) .
9471.1984(01)
9433.1986(01)
9443.1986(06) I
9441.1986(03) ;
9441.1986(83)
9441.1995(05)
9441.1984(37) !
9441.1983(08) <
9484.1985(01b)
/ /
01/01/91
11/01/91
03/30/84
01/07/86
03/12/86
01/07/86
11/13/86
02/17/95
11/14/84
10/21/83
11/14/85
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF I / /
I
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 79
LIABILITY
(See Financial Responsibility)
LIABILITY COVERAGE
(See Financial Responsibility)
LINERS
(See Minimum Technological Requirements) (See also Land Disposal Facilities)
LIQUID WASTE
(See also Land Disposal Restrictions, Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
"LIQUIDS AND FREE LIQUIDS, DEFINITION OF
*PH TESTING OF SOLID/WATER MIXTURE
"TREATMENT TANKS FOR LEACHATE OR LIQUID WASTES
BAN ON DISPOSAL OF LIQUIDS IN LANDFILLS
CLARIFICATION OF THE CHARACTERISTIC OF IGNITABILITY AS IT PERTAINS TO SOLIDS VS. LIQUIDS
CLOSURE & POST-CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS REGARDING HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT, STORAGE AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES
CONTINUED LANDFILL DISPOSAL OF LAB PACKS
CORROSIVE CHARACTERISTIC APPLIED TO LIQUID AND AQUEOUS WASTES
DETERMINATION OF THE IGNITABILITY CHARACTERISTIC
DISTILLATION BOTTOM TARS AS K022 WASTE
IGNITABILITY OR CORROSIVITY TESTING-LIQUID AND AQUEOUS DEFINITION
LIQUID AS IT APPLIES TO IGNITABLE OR CORROSIVE WASTES
LIQUID HAZARDOUS WASTES IN LANDFILLS
LIQUID WASTE, DEFINITION OF
LIQUID, FREE LIQUID, RELEASABLE LIQUID DEFINITIONS
NONHAZARDOUS LIQUID WASTEWATERS AND SLUDGES IN SANITARY LF UNDER RCRA AND HSWA, DISPOSAL OF
PLACEMENT OF BULK LIQUIDS IN LANDFILL
SCINTILLATION COCKTAIL, REGULATION OF LIQUID
SPENT CYANIDE PLATING BATH SOLUTIONS FROM SILVER RECOVERY
WASTE AS LIQUID OR SOLID, DETERMINATION OF
Absorbents
"ADDING ABSORBENT TO WASTE CONTAINERS
*LAB PACKS AT GENERATOR SITES
ABSORBENTS FOR CONTAINERIZED LIQUID HAZARDOUS WASTES, USE OF
APPLICABILITY OF THE PAINT FILTER LIQUIDS TEST TO SORBENTS
APPLICABILITY OF USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS TO ACTIVITIES INVOLVING SEPARATION OF USED OIL FROM SORBENT MATERIALS
BULK LIQUID HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLIDIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF TREATED WASTES - USE OF SW-846 METHODS, WASTE IDENTIFICATION
CONTAINERIZED AND BULK HAZARDOUS LIQUIDS IN RCRA LANDFILLS
DISPOSAL OF SORBED LIQUIDS, PARTICULARLY "BIODEGRADABLE" SORBENTS IN WASTES DESTINED FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE LANDFILLS
POSITION PAPER ON SPENT ABSORBENT MATERIALS
PROHIBITION ON PLACING LIQUIDS IN LANDFILL
REGULATORY STATUS AND MANAGEMENT OF LIQUIDS AND ABSORBENT MATERIALS CONTAINING LIQUIDS
REGULATORY STATUS OF ABSORBENT MATERIAL WHEN MIXED WITH HAZARDOUS WASTE PRIOR TO INCINERATION
Bulk Liquids
"STORAGE PRIOR TO RECYCLING
BULK LIQUID HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLIDIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
BULK LIQUIDS AND DRAIN/LEACHING FIELDS
CONTAINERIZED AND BULK HAZARDOUS LIQUIDS IN RCRA LANDFILLS
PCS-CONTAMINATED WASTES, STABILIZATION OF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
9432.1985(03)
9443.1983(03)
9471.1984(01)
9487.1985(03)
9443.1995(03)
9476.1983(02)
9487.1985(02)
9443.1987(17)
9443.1991(01)
9444.1989(04)
9432.1990(01)
9441.1989(51)
9487.1985(04)
9432.1981(01)
9432.1989(04)
9574.1985(01)
9487.1984(05)
9443.1987(18)
9441.1989(34)
9445.1984(06)
9453.1990(02)
9453.1988(02)
9487.1985(05)
9443.1993(06)
9592.1994 (09)
9487.1987(01)
9445.1987 (03a)
9487.1986(12)
9551.1993(02)
9441.1991(09)
9487.1985(10)
9551.1993(04)
9441.1992(29)
9475.1987(01)
9487.1987(01)
9487.1986(09)
9487.1986(12)
9487.1988(01)
/ /
05/30/85
02/28/83
03/30/84
05/29/85
09/19/95
01/11/83
05/10/85
08/18/87
09/06/91
07/13/89
02/16/90
10/05/89
08/07/85
06/28/81
07/20/89
01/22/85
11/12/84
08/19/87
07/06/89
07/30/84
07/30/90
01/30/88
09/20/85
10/12/93
09/28/94
01/20/87
11/17/87
12/30/86
05/05/93
06/21/91
12/05/85
11/17/93
09/04/92
04/30/87
01/20/87
06/12/86
12/30/86
02/03/88
-------
M: IIMPE'
|lj !!§!!
<«• ;!
;'« -ff " »i • ;'• - -i
ijlj !pi 11; Bis : i![ ii
iiiiM! s[!|!
07/02/96
KEYWORD 1MOBX
r
! j!;!|;
Page Jto.1 80
!i pi HI; ; (g?
»* =1^^^ ;i i i ii -~m jj* i =;; M»= = ! ii« iiiijiii jji i iii ~ \\
PLACEMENT OF STABILIZED] HASTESfrHAT BO--MOT MEET t^MD-aSsTRICMON REQUIREMENTS^
PROHIBITION ON PLACING LIQUIDS*™ LANDFILL -
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS - . -
i I I i ',< • IE!
Non-Hazardous Liquids ! ~ '
BAN ON USE OF LIQUIDS IN LANDFILLS •-•*:_
= i fc i i I r^j
LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE i . ;
(See also Solid Waste, Deliating, Characteristic Hazardous Waste, Hazardous Waste -Identification, Dioxin)
*DELISTING BY STATES < . . j - . -
'HAZARDOUS HASTE LISTED SOLELY FOR SUBPART C CHARACTERISTICS
•SPENT SOLVENTS IN SCINTALLATION COCKTAILS
AUTOMOTIVE FLUIDS, REGULATION OF • .; j : - ;
CARBON REGENERATION FACILITIES
CHEMICAL AGENTS GB, VX, AND HX AT MUNITIONS DISPOSAL FACILITY • -' = - i
DELISTING CRITERIA/LEACHATB LEVELS
ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE DUST AFTER ENCAPSULATION TREATMENT PROCESS -. . -
ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES FROM WOOD PRESERVING PLANTS
ETCHANTS USED TO MANUFACTURE COPPER SALTS
EXCLUSION FROM REGULATION FOR CHARACTERISTIC AND LISTED WASTES - LEACHATE LEVELS
FEDERAL POLICY REGARDING DIOXIN DISPOSAL , :
K006 WASTE AND ONSITE DISPOSAL UNIT CONTAINING THESE WASTES : !
K035 LISTING AND INCLUSION OF SLUDGES FROM BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF CREOSOTE PRODUCTION WASTEWATERS
LD50 AS CRITERIA FOR LISTING HAZARDOUS WASTE
LISTING OF TF-1, AN ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER FLUSHING AGENT :
MANAGEMENT OF WASTES PRIOR TO INTRODUCTION INTO SEWER
MECHANICAL PLATING WASTES IN THE F006 LISTING, NON-INCLUSION OF
MIXTURE OF CHARACTERISTIC WASTE AND LISTED WASTE, ASH FROM INCINERATION
MIXTURES OF SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTES
MIXTURES OF SOLID WASTE AND A WASTE LISTED SOLELY BECAUSE IT EXHIBITS A CHARACTERISTIC
PETITION TO WITHDRAW K090 AND K091 LISTINGS
PETROLEUM FACILITIES INCLUDED IN THE K051 LISTING FOR API SEPARATOR SLUDGE
PROCESS WASTES CONTAINING INKS, PAINTS, AND ADHESIVES
RECYCLED CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE SLUDGES
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO TWO WASTE STREAMS THAT WOULD BE BILAYERED THROUGH PHASE SEPARATION! AT A LICENSED TSDF
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS PERTAINING TO THE MANAGEMENT OF WASTE SOLVENTS AND USED OIL
REGULATORY STATUS OF RECLAIMED SOLVENT FROM USED DRY CLEANING FILTERS
RELISTING HAZARDOUS WASTE
RESPONSE TO REGION III IMPLEMENTATION AND OVERSIGHT ISSUES
SCINTILLATION COCKTAIL, REGULATION OF LIQUID
SCRAP DEHP AND SMALL CAPACITORS CONTAINING DEHP, DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
SCRUBBER BRINE/SLUDGE PRODUCED IN INCINERATION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE
SLUDGES GENERATED FROM THE FIRST CLEANING STAGES OF PHOSPHATING PROCESS
SOLVENTS USED AS REACTANT AND SOLVENT HASTES GENERATED BY A PRODUCTION PROCESS
SPENT FLUIDIZED BED MEDIA AND CHANGES UNDER INTERIM STATUS
SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURE (NALCAST 6015/WATER/WAX)
TOLUENE-CONTAINING PAINT PRODUCTS FROM WOOD PIECES, REGULATORY STATUS
USED OIL, BURNING OF OFF-SPECIFICATION FUEL - DUMPING
WASTE CODE LISTINGS AND TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS
WASTE FROM ELECTROLESS PLATING PROCESSES NOT COVERED UNDER REINTERPRETED F006 LISTING
WASTE GENERATED DURING THE MANUFACTURE OF POLYURETHANE FOAM
Chlorination Tank
DRAGOUT FROM F007 - SPENT CYANIDE PLATING BATH SOLUTIONS
f i, -' „ i ,' •-
95S4M989I02) 05/05/89
1 9487M9SS(10) 12/05/85
0-14 03/14/86 =-
.:- . : •-.;..-.= 94871.1986 (07)t;
Ml „:: ,\i i i, Ii! ! 5..
XREF
: : ; ; i 9541j.l986(24U
'-'.'-. 9441.1986 (74)i
; ..,;.. 9444:. 1989(020):
- " " QAA 1 ~° -1 QQT Ii A \ s
- :- - -= ' l7*l*l J. . J.yo 1 111 | -
-" - - 9441.1986(26)
-•- -.---•: 9443i.l984(03) :
9433.1986(01)
9444'.1986(33)
, : 9444.1986(07)
- 9441.1986(82)
; 9441.1986(03) .
:.;-,.; 94441.1987(26) ,
- ; 94321.1987(09) '
9444.1987(52)
9443,. 1988 (09) :
9442.1986(04) !
9441.1986(73)
9444.1986(13)
9441.1985(32) •
9441.1987(06) •
9441.1985(38) :
9444.1989(11)
9444.1987(20) :
9441.1987(09)
9441.1985(39) I
TSDF 9441.1994(27) 1
9441.1992(36) ;
9441.1992(11)
9442.1986(08) ',
9541.1986(10) '
— 9443.1987(18) <
9441.1985(23) ;
9441.1984(05) :
9444 ,1986 (11) !
9444.1986(27)
; 9444.1986(28)
; :" 9444.1985(15) j
i 9443.1988(01)
i 9441.1986(40)
9444.1989(12) .
9444.1987(51)
9441.1992(24)
04/27/8,6
t ,
10/30/86
09/30/86
03/31/89
04/02/86
06/04/84
01/07/86
12/29/86
04/07/86
11/08/86
01/07/86
07/02/87
08/19/87
12/11/87
09/09/88
05/06/86
09/25/86
06/24/86
10/07/85
01/27/87
11/20/85
10/03/89
05/26/87
02/19/87
11/25/85
10/04/94
10/28/92
05/28/92
08/21/86
05/01/86
08/19/87
06/27/85
02/19/84
05/22/86
12/05/86
12/05/86
06/24/85
01/04/88
07/31/86
10/05/89
12/04/87
08/17/92
;: 9444.1984 (14) \ 07/30/84
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 81
Commercial Chemical Products
•BERYLLIUM DUST (P015) ; APPLICABILITY
•BURNING/BLENDING OF UNUSED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT (XYLENE) WITH USED OIL
*COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT DEFINITION IN 261.33
•DEFINITION OF SOLID WASTE AND RECLAMATION
•DISCARDED MERCURY THERMOMETERS
•EPINEPHRINE RESIDUE IN A SYRINGE IS NOT P042
*F006 SLUDGE FROM ACID WASTE MIXTURE
•HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL IN INCINERATORS
•ISOMERS OF P- AND U-LISTED WASTES
•LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - HALOGENATED ORGANIC CARBONS
•METHYL CHLOROFORM
•NITROGLYCERIN PATCHES: NOT LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE WHEN DISCARDED UNUSED
•NITROGLYCERINE PILLS AS COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS
•OFF-SPECIFICATION CIRCUIT PRINTING BOARDS - REGULATORY STATUS
•OFF-SPECIFICATION PARAFORMALDEHYDE MEETS COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT LISTING
•RECLAIMED COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS: REGULATORY STATUS
•SECONDARY MATERIALS USED AS EFFECTIVE SUBSTITUTES FOR COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS
•SOLID WASTE DETERMINATION
•SOLID WASTE DETERMINATION FOR SPILLED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS
•SOLVENT MIXTURE RULE
•SPILLS OF COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS
BOTBLER ST™ONTAINING PHOSPHOROUS OXYCHLORIDE ARE NOT WASTE WHEN RETURNED TO THE UNITED STATES FROM JAPAN FOR REGENERATION
BURNING CHARACTERISTIC OFF-SPECIFICATION PETROLEUM PRODUCTS FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
CA!STE^TING DETERMINATION (60 FR 7824, FEBRUARY 9, 1995) AS IT RELATES TO THE LATEX PROCESS WASTES GENERATED BY A COMPANY
CARBON SCRUBBER WASTES IN WHICH PRODUCT MATERIALS ARE CAPTURED
CHLORDANE AND HEPTACHLOR PESTICIDE WASTE
CLARIFICATION OF HOWTRCRAIREGULATIONSDAPPLY TO OFF-SPECIFICATION FUELS THAT ARE BEING BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
CLARIFICATION ON HOW REUSE. OF "WASTE RESINS" AS FEED STOCK TO MANUFACTURE NEW PRODUCTS ARE REGULATED UNDER RCRA
CLARIFICATION ON WHEN USED MERCURY RELAYS/SWITCHES BECOME SPENT
COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT P LISTING APPLIES ONLY TO UNUSED PRODUCT, NOT USED RESIDUES
COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS UNDER 261.33
COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS USED IN AIR BAGS - EFFECT ON RECYCLE OF FERROUS SCRAP FROM AUTOMOBILES
COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS, RECYCLING A MIXTURE OF
CONTAINERS THAT HELD COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS, DEFINITION OF EMPTY
CONTAINERS USED TO HOLD LISTED CHEMOTHERAPY DRUGS
COPPER PLATING SOLUTION REACTED WITH A CHELATING AGENT TO PRODUCE A COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER
CORROSIVE SOLIDS, COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS, REACTIVE WASTES DEFINED
DESIGNATION OF AMERICIUM BERYLLIUM SOURCES UNDER RCRA
DIMETHYL BENZENE-LISTING CLARIFICATION
DISCARDED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS
DISCARDED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS
DISCARDED OFF-GAS PIPING, EQUIPMENT, AND OFF-GAS SCRUBBER SOLUTION FROM A TANK SYSTEM
DRAGOUT FROM F007 - SPENT CYANIDE PLATING BATH SOLUTIONS
ELECTROLESS ZINC PLATING WASTE NOT IN F006 LISTING
ELECTROPLATING RINSEWATERS
EMPTY TANK CARS THAT CONTAINED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT
EXEMPTION FOR COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
EXEMPTION FOR COMMERCIAL FERTILIZERS ONCE THE FERTILIZER IS PRODUCED
F SOLVENT WASTES
F006 LISTING DOES NOT INCLUDE ZINC PHOSPHATING WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES
F006 LISTING FOR PICKLING AND ETCHING WASTES AND DELISTING ISSUES
F019 LISTING AND THE CONVERSION COATING PROCESS
F021 LISTING FOR SUBSTANCES CONTAINING CHLOROPHENOLIC COMPOUNDS
FLOATING PLASTIC BALLS USED TO CONTROL VAPORS FROM TANKS CONTAINING LISTED PRODUCT
9444.1992(06)
9442.1985(01)
9444.1992(01)
9444.1987(373)
9444.1989(09)
9444.1994(10)
9441.1987(11)
9441.1986(87)
9444.1995(02)
9553.1987(13)
9444.1984(17)
9445.1995(01)
9444.1993(05)
9441.1991(14)
9442.1994 (03)
9444.1992(07)
9441.1992(13)
9441.1985(19a)
9441.1995(20)
9441.1987(18)
9444.1989(14)
9441.1986(56)
9456.1994(01)
9441.1986(95)
9441.1995(28)
9444.1987(15)
9444.1988(10)
9571.1993(02)
9441.1994(18)
9441.1994(19)
9441.1994 (25)
9444.1986(29)
9444.1980(01)
9441.1985(02)
9441.1986(34)
9441.1984(26)
9441.1987(45)
9493.1986(01)
9443.1984(09)
9441.1992(17)
9444.1990(03)
9444.1988(12)
9444.1985(05)
9442.1993(01)
9444.1984(14)
9444.1987(23)
9442.1987(03)
9441.1985(41)
9441.1988(33)
9493.1986(03)
9444.1985(03)
9444.1987(27)
9444.1987(55)
9444.1987(22)
9444.1987(42)
9444.1986(25)
11/30/92
12/30/85
03/31/92
08/31/87
08/30/89
12/31/94
02/28/87
11/30/86
09/30/95
09/30/87
08/30/84
04/30/95
09/30/93
08/01/91
03/31/94
11/30/92
05/31/92
05/31/85
05/31/95
03/30/87
11/30/89
07/28/86
12/16/94
12/23/86
08/24/95
05/18/87
05/03/88
11/05/93
07/11/94
07/11/94
09/28/94
12/08/86
09/04/80
01/16/85
04/28/86
09/11/84
06/16/87
01/22/86
11/29/84
06/16/92
04/05/90
05/19/88
05/14/85
09/20/93
07/30/84
06/30/87
07/28/87
12/12/85
07/27/88
08/21/86
04/01/85
07/06/87
12/28/87
06/24/87
09/23/87
11/03/86
-------
S Bi
I! I I!
07/02/9S
IM0EX
m
• 1!
[II
I Si
i «!
MBRCUWfl HHICI1 IS 'DISTILLED AND SOLD AS AM INGREDIENT IH AM INDUSTRIAL PROCESS *
•HAZARDOUS WASTE LISTING ;FOR F006 HASTE < , s
XABORATORiBS, RCRA REGULATION IMPACT ' '
; (LUBRICATING OIL AND JET FUELS USED TO PRODUCE PETROLEUM PRODUCTS - - . ij»
! IMANUFACTURING HASTE CONTAINING COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS IN 261.33 ' "' ; ' < W
MATERIALS CONTAMINATED WITH PESTICIDE PRODUCTS ^
| [MERCURY SUITABLE FOR DIRECT USE (99t PURE) NOT SOLID WASTE . j it, : i , IB
! MERCURY THERMOMETERS, RECLAIMED OFF-SPEC AND BROKEN " S
i METAL FINISHING SLUDGES ; -' *v • ' - - - :- . : -<-•'-
. MICRO-CLEAR REGULATORY STATUS "-_ ' . :_ ,
' MIXED SOLVENT WASTES '" " £ 1 ' ;
MIXTURE OF F003 AND A SOLID WASTE AND DELISTING REQUIREMENTS "' " - -; '- ; ' - =' '
• OFF-SPEC COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS AT BOTTLING FACILITY '<
: OFF-SPECIFICATION JET FUEL BURNED AS KEROSENE FUEL , i i ^ ; ,J i - - --'. , - ; ,- == i
OFF-SPECIFICATION JET FUELS, RECYCLING OF UNUSED " ^ '': ;" ? s "- ' " ' -! " '
; P AND U-LISTED HASTES ! •* - -- ". - ; "
; PAINTS CONTAINING SOLVENTS " ' ' .---.-.- r - .: ' ' '
PERCHLOROETHYLENE AND SURFACTANT, DISTILLATION OF RESIDUE CONTAINING ..-."....
PESTICIDE APPLICATOR WASHING RINSE WATER : . „; .- :. ' ...!".-
: PLASTIC PACKING MEDIA FROM AIR STRIPPING TOWER TREATING CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER " ' :
; RECYCLED GASOLINE/WATER AND FUEL OIL/WATER MIXTURES
! RECYCLING OF ELECTROPLATING SLUDGES (F006) FOR CEMENT/AGGREGATE MANUFACTURE !:
! REGULATORY STATUS OF NATURAL GAS REGULATORS THAT CONTAIN MERCURY UNDER RCRA ^ "
1 REGULATORY STATUS OF RESIDUAL AVIATION FUELS THAT ARE BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
: REGULATORY STATUS OF SOILS CONTAMINATED FROM RELEASES OF COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS
i REGULATORY STATUS OF UNDEPLOYED AUTOMOTIVE AIRBAG INFLATORS
: SOIL CONTAMINATED WITH CHLORDANE AS A RESULT OF PESTICIDE APPLICATION
i SOLVENT AND COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT WASTE STREAMS
SOLVENT-CONTAMINATED WASTESTREAMS FROM A PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURER
SOLVENTS USED AS REACTANT AND SOLVENT WASTES GENERATED BY A PRODUCTION PROCESS :
SOLVENTS USED AS REACTANT NOT LISTED AS SPENT SOLVENT OR COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT
SPENT PIPELINE FILTER CARTRIDGES !
STATUS OF CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE AS A HAZARDOUS WASTE I
STATUS OF UNLISTED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS WHEN RECYCLED , '.
STILL BOTTOM WASTE GENERATED BY A POLYSTYRENE PRODUCTION FACILITY i -
THE STATUS OF UNUSED OFF-SPECIFICATION LEAD PLATES USED IN THE PRODUCTION OF LEAD-ACID AUTOMOTIVE BATTERIES
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL METHODS FOR LOW-LEVEL WASTES THAT CONTAIN UNCONTAMINATED OR RADIOACTIVE LEAD
USED REFRIGERANTS UNDER 40 CFR 261.2
WASHWATERS GENERATED FROM WASHING PESTICIDE APPLICATOR TRUCKS
WASTE GENERATED BY AN INCINERATOR TRIAL BURN OF SAND SPIKED WITH TRICHLOROBENZENE AND HEXACHLOROETHANE
WASTE LISTINGS FOR COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS - MERCURY
WASTES CONTAINING F001-F005 CONSTITUENTS
WASTES COVERED UNDER THE DIOXIN LISTING
WASTES FROM BRIGHT DIPPING UNDER THE REINTERPRETED F006 LISTING -'-..-.;
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE EXEMPTION FOR ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM i .
WASTEHATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS
i WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES RESULTING FROM METAL CLEANING PROCESS i -i i ; '. •'• :: - .
: jf = = : = _ ' '_ -'- I 1 =
Definition
*NITROGLYCERINE PILLS AS COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS v
: REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR TANKS, VEHICLES, VESSELS, PROCESS OR MANUFACTURING UNITS, OR PIPELINES WHICH'HAVE BEEN SHUTDOWN
REGULATORY STATUS OF RESIDUAL AVIATION FUELS THAT ARE BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY - :
; TREATMENT RESIDUALS OF CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE AS A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE !
F-Wastes
*COMPARATIVE DEFINITIONS OF F001 AND F002 ! i
*DILUTION OF F003 WASTES
Page Mo, 82
•
9441.1994(08)
9441,1986(78)
,944U,1990,(32}
i9494!.1985J(01)
'9444«.198l!(01)
:9444<.1987i(40)
194411, 19861(43)
9441=. 19865(27)
?9444i.l988!(01)
;94445.1990i<02)
i9444l. 19881(02)
>944l!. 19B7,(65)
,944lU989>(49)
l944l!.1986i(19)
;944l!.i989l(39)
J9444!.!l989!(07)
:9444=. 1988(11)
•9441i.l985i(10)
9441!. 19851(42)
i944lj. 1989;( 17)
:944l!.1986;(22)
;944lj. 19891(19)
19442;. 1994 1(06)
i944l!.1995;(04)
!944i:.1992;(34)
;9441i.l992i(08)
:9444i.l9B6:<20)
-94441 1989!(03)
:9441.1988(49)
9444.1986(27)
9441.1986(92)
9444.1988(03)
9444.1992(02)
9444.1993(01)
9432.1988(01)
9441.1995(31)
9441.1987(52)
9441.1990(28)
9441.1986(44)
9441.1988(04)
-9441.1988(45) —
9441.1988(05)
9444.1986(23)
9444.1987(28)
9441.1986(29)
9444.1985(13)
9444.1989(08)
! I Hi !
: c ;
03/30/9*
10/12/661
11/28/90
10/01/85 I
03/12/81 '
09/09/87 i
05/30/86 i
04/02/86
01/11/88
03/22/90 '
01/20/88
08/17/87 I
09/28/89 -
03/08/86 1
07/31/89
08/21/89 •
05/05/88
04/10/85
12/13/85
04/14/89
03/19/86
04/26/89 !
07/29/94 I
02/02/95
10/15/92
04/23/92 ;
09/29/86
06/28/89
12/06/88
12/05/86 i
12/05/86 !
02/11/88 i
08/24/92 ;
02/23/93 ,
02/11/88 '
09/14/95 :
06/26/87 !
10/18/90
05/30/86 :
01/14/88 :
11/02/88 :
02/22/88
10/21/86
07/13/87
04/09/86 '
09/03/85 '.
08/21/89 s
9444.1993(05) 09/30/93
9441.1995(15) 04/20/95
9441.1995(04) 02/02/95
9441.1988(44) 10/27/88
9444.1991(03)
9441.19861
(^^
05/01/91
12/30/86
I I
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No.
83
•F006 SLUDGE FROM ACID WASTE MIXTURE
*F009 LISTING FOR ELECTROPLATING AFTER CYANIDE BATH
*F019 LISTING APPLICABILITY TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES
*HYDROCHLOROFLUOROCARBONS USED IN DECREASING
WASTE CODE AS IT APPLIES TO CONTAMINATION FROM SPILLS
*PERCHLOROETHYLENE USED IN DRY CLEANING
'PROHIBITION ON STORAGE OF RESTRICTED WASTES
•RECLAIMED SPENT WOOD PRESERVATIVE EXCLUSION IN 261. 4 (a) (9)
•SOLVENT MIXTURE RULE
•SOLVENT MIXTURE RULE, THE
•SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS
•SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES (F-WASTES)
•SPENT SOLVENTS FROM VARNISH STRIPPING
•TECHNICAL GRADE SOLVENT FORMULATIONS AND THE F003 LISTING
•UNUSED FORMULATIONS CONTAINING SODIUM PENTACHLOROPHENATE ARE F027
•WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE FROM CHEMICAL ETCHING
•WOOD PRESERVING WASTES - ADMINISTRATIVE STAY
ACETONE AND METHANOL CONTAMINATED WASHWATERS
CERTIFICATION/NOTIFICATION FOR MULTIPLE-CONSTITUENT WASTES SUBJECT TO LDRs
SCTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE OR SOLID WASTE TREATMENT MAY CREATE A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE
^rZ^S^S^SS^^.1^^^ WASTE DESTINED FOR RECYCLING; AND TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR CFC
CLARIFICATION OF WASTEWATERSTREATMENT SLUDGE FROM THE REVISED "ZINC-COBALT ALLOY PLATING ON CARBON STEEL" PROCESS
^
^ -PPER SMELTER is A SOLID WASTE
DIOXIN IN WASTES FROM WOOD PRESERVING PROCESSES USING PENTACHLOROPHENOL
DISCARDED WASTEWATER AT A CORROSION CONTROL FACILITY
DRAFT SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN FOR NH PLATING COMPANY
DRAGOUT FROM F007 - SPENT CYANIDE PLATING BATH SOLUTIONS
DRYCLEANING INDUSTRY WASTES
ELECTROCHEMICAL MACHINING WASTES AND THE SCOPE OF THE F006 LISTING
ELECTROLESS ZINC PLATING WASTE NOT IN F006 LISTING
ELECTROPLATING RINSEWATERS
F003 10% RULE AND ASSOCIATED REGULATIONS
F005 LISTING FOR PYRIDINE STILL BOTTOMS
F006 AND F019 ELECTROPLATING LISTINGS
F006 LISTING AND DEFINITION OF CONVERSION COATING
F006 LISTING APPLIED TO PRINTING INDUSTRY
FOOfi LISTING FOR PICKLING AND ETCHING WASTES AND DELISTING ISSUES
F006 WASTES, VHS AND GROUNDWATER MONITORING DATA TO EVALUATE A DELISTING PETITION FOR
F009 LISTING AND THE MIXTURE RULE TO ELECTROPLATING RINSEWATERS AND RESINS
F019 LISTING AND THE CONVERSION COATING PROCESS
F019 LISTING FOR WWT SLUDGES IN ALUMINUM ANODIZING
F024 REVISED TREATMENT STANDARDS „„„.„„„
F027 LISTING - USED AND UNUSED FORMULATIONS IN WOOD PRESERVING
HAZARDOUS WASTE LISTING FOR F006 WASTE
IDENTIFICATION OF SPENT SOLVENT IN CERTAIN INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES
INK FORMULATION WASTES AS BOTH K086 AND F001-005 WASTES
9441.1987(11)
9444.1989(06)
9441.1989(53)
9443.1992(06)
9441.1987(71)
9444.1991(06)
9444.1992(04)
9453.1986(06)
9441.1991(19)
9441.1987(18)
9444.1985(153)
9444.1988(09)
9443.1986(05)
9441.1986(57)
9444.1994(05)
9444.1994(06)
9444.1984 (02)
9489.1991(03)
9444.1989(05)
9441.1986(54)
9444.1986(08)
9444.1994(08)
9551.1991(10)
9442.1989(05)
9441.1989(40)
9444.1992(08)
9444.1992(09)
9441.1994(26)
9444.1992(05)
9441.1994(20)
9441.1987(26)
9488.1987(01)
9444.1984(01)
9441.1995(24)
9444.1985(02)
9444.1991(05)
9433.1990(06)
9444.1984(14)
9444.1987(07)
9444.1987(03)
9444.1987(23)
9442.1987(03)
9444.1987(30)
9444.1987(53)
9444.1986(09)
9444.1987(09)
9444.1987(19)
9444.1987(55)
9433.1987(09)
9444.1987(31)
9444.1987(22)
9445.1985(03)
9554.1990(05)
9444.1987(10)
9441.1986(78)
9441.1992(44)
9444.1987(41)
02/28/87
07/30/89
10/30/89
12/31/92
08/30/87
11/01/91
10/31/92
11/30/86
12/01/91
03/30/87
07/31/85
04/30/88
01/30/86
05/30/86
06/30/94
08/31/94
03/30/84
06/01/91
07/21/89
07/15/86
05/02/86
09/21/94
06/05/91
07/05/89
08/02/89
12/11/92
12/24/92
09/28/94
11/04/92
08/02/94
04/17/87
02/09/87
03/05/84
06/30/95
03/04/85
11/26/91
11/27/90
07/30/84
03/06/87
01/27/87
06/30/87
07/28/87
07/21/87
12/15/87
05/02/86
03/26/87
05/22/87
12/28/87
06/08/87
07/28/87
06/24/87
05/31/85
06/25/90
04/09/81
10/12/85
12/22/9J
09/15/87
-------
Ml M
OT/02/96
11
!K!H II :
i Si i:
I1
n
|| || !| !
KEYWORD 1TOEX
LABORATORY HAST&GENERATED IH RBSBABCH.reilbSrCI»sSTOCKi^O«jftoHS
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS CLARIFICATIONS t " ~
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS REGULATION OF CYANIDES, ^
LDR DETERMINATION OP HASTE STREAM DILUTION J 6 i = -
M'BTHANOL RECOVERS SYSTEM - CLARIFICATION OP HASTE'STATUS ' '
MIXTURE OF F003 AND A SOLID WASTE AND DELISTING REQUIREMENTS •
MIXTURES OF LISTED AND CHARACTERISTIC HASTES i i = -
ON-SITE RECYCLING OF SPENT SOLVENTS BY GENERATORS
PAINT RESIDUES ON CONVEYOR HOOKS
PAINT HASTES AND THE SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS
PAINTING CONTRACTOR WASTES-SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR •
PENTACHLOROPHENOL AS A HOOD PRESERVATIVE \ '-
PROCESS WASTEHATER FROM METAL DECREASING OPERATIONS ' :
RAGS AND SIMILAR MATERIALS ABSORBING VOLATILES AND F-WASTES, HANDLING i
REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE MIXING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLVENTS AND USED OIL
REGULATORY DETERMINATION - SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS AND THE MIXTURE RULE
REGULATORY INTERPRETATION REGARDING PHOTORESIST SOLIDS ("SKINS") GENERATED IN-THE PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD MANUFACTURING
^ REGULATORY STATUS OF HASTE GENERATED BY MCLAUGHLIN GORMLEY KING (MGK) COMPANY-IN MINNESOTA '
.REGULATORY STATUS OF WOOD STICKERS USED FOR WOOD PRESERVING OPERATIONS ' -
REINTERPRETATION NARROWING THE SCOPE OF THE F006 LISTING 2 '• '
REINTERPRETATION OF THE F006 LISTING L : ;
RESIDUALS MATERIALS CONTAMINATED WITH TRACE SOLVENTS ^ ' : ;
SLUDGE CONTAINING 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE (TCE) E '
SOIL CONTAMINATED WITH PESTICIDE " ' . ' '
SOIL CONTAMINATED WITH USED AND UNUSED PESTICIDES ' !
SOLVENT LISTINGS AND LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS '" :- :
SOLVENT LISTINGS FOR PAINT WASTES/REMOVER AND SPILL RESIDUE "J : ;
SOLVENT LISTINGS, SCOPE OF I , ;
SOLVENT-CONTAMINATED WASTESTREAMS FROM A PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURER '"
SOLVENT-CONTAMINATED WASTESTREAMS FROM PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURER :: ", , - ; ;
SOLVENTS USED AS COOLANTS AND APPLICABILITY OF SOLVENT LISTINGS -= •
SOLVENTS USED AS REACTANT NOT LISTED AS SPENT SOLVENT OR COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT •
SPENT CARBON USED TO REMOVE DISSOLVED PENTACHLOROPHENOL (PCP) FROM GROUNDWATER •
SPENT ION EXCHANGE RESIN i ' '• \
SPENT ION EXCHANGE RESINS AND FILTER AS HAZARDOUS WASTE -• '
STILL BOTTOMS FROM LISTED SOLVENT RECLAMATION ! : ! !
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE CONTAMINATED WITH POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs) '- ' I !
UNRINSED CONTAINERS WHICH FORMERLY CONTAINED AN UNUSED FORMULATION OF PENTACHLOROPHENOL '
WASTE FROM CHEMICAL ETCHING USING CYANIDE •• ' ; i
WASTE LISTINGS F006 AND K062, SCOPE OF = '
WASTES CONTAINING F001-FOOS CONSTITUENTS . . . ; . ;. . J-r. '.
WASTES FROM ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) ON CARBON STEEL EXCLUDED FROM F006 • '• '
WASTES GENERATED FROM EXTRACTION PROCESS :
WASTES GENERATED IN A PROCESS USING METHYLENE CHLORIDE TO RECOVER ALKALOIDS FROM PLANT MATTER ^
WASTEHATER TREATMENT EFFLUENT FROM PROCESSES THAT GENERATE K001 AND F006 WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE :
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS :
WASTEWATERS EXCLUSION FROM THE DEFINITION OF F021 FOR PCP MANUFACTURE : ' i
WATER WALL SPRAY BOOTH WASTES AND THE SOLVENT LISTINGS f ;
WATER/METHANOL MIXTURE WASTESTREAM
'ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) ON CARBON STEEL :
! 1 :
Iron Foundry Waste
FOUNDRY SANDS RECYCLED AND RETURNED TO THE FOUNDRY !
GRAY IRON FOUNDRY HASTE DISPOSAL • " ' !
K062 LISTING APPLIES ONLY TO FACILITIES WITHIN THE IRON AND STEEL INDUSTRY ' ;
MINING WASTE EXCLUSION FOR A FERROALLOY FACILITY I : -i I
CUNG OF MOLDING AND CASTING SANDS
INDUSTRY
9444.1986(16)
9551.1987(01):
5554 .1991_(01) =
5551.1990(06)1
9441.1987(46)::
9441,1987(65)1!
9441.1987?(68)"'
9441.1986i(21)
9443.19801(03)
9444:, 19871(17)
9441!. 19865(47)
: 9444i. 19881(15)
!j9553j.1988i(02)I
>i:94411. 19891(50)
! 9441u 1992i(38)
li9441l.1992'(21)
9443:. 1994 ,( 04)
9444.1992»(03)
: 9442;.1994:(04)
:;9444;.1986l(21)_
i 9444i.l986:(19)
9444:. 19911(04)
9551;.1987:(13)
944l'.1987(21)
9444.1987(12)
9444.1987(18)
9444.1987(11)
9444.1986(26)
9441.1988(49)
9443.1988(11) -
9444.1987(02)
9441.1986(92)
9444.1986(05)
9444.1985(11)
9444.1987(13) i
9444.1987(05) =
9444.1989(10)
9444.1986(03)
9444.1987(16)
9444.1986(32) -
^9441.1988(05) ^
9444.1987(14)
9442.1986(07)
9441.1986(52) -
9444.1984(10)
9444.1985(13) =
9444.1987(39)
9444.1987(06)
9443.1985(07)
9444.1984(09)
=
9441.1987(13) i
9486.1981(01) •
9444.1987(08) 1
08/18/86 i
01/20/87 n
01/08/91 : '
10/14/90 ! !
06/17/87
08/17/87 i I
08/19/87 ' '
03/13/86
12/20/80 \ ;
05/20/87 :
06/02/86 ; •
08/29/88 , '
03/08/88 i I
10/20/89 : 1
11/05/92 : i
07/16/92 ' "
07/12/94
10/20/92 ;
04/08/94 i
10/04/86 ,
09/25/86
08/30/91 : '
06/26/87 ' :
04/08/87 ;
04/18/87
OS/20/87 '- ''
04/14/87 :
11/07/86
12/06/88 i >
12/06/88 !
01/27/87 '
12/05/86 * !
03/03/86 ' !
06/19/85 i :
05/05/87 , i
02/02/87 i I
09/22/89 :
02/12/86 1 =
05/20/87 : 1
12/12/86 ! ;
02/22/88 "
05/08/87 I
07/02/86 ; I
07/02/86 :
07/25/84
09/03/85 ! i
09/02/87 s
02/28/87 '
09/10/85 :
06/13/84
1 i
03/04/87 i i
06/18/81 ! •
03/16/87 ! i
RMKL]
9441.1986(48) ~ 06/10/86
01/06/86
l«
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 85
K-Wastes
*API SEPARATOR SLUDGE, EXCLUSION OF WATER FRACTION FROM K051 LISTING
*BAGHOUSE DUST GENERATED FROM REMELTING PRIMARY PRODUCED STEEL
*K052 BOTTOMS FROM TANK STORING LEADED GASOLINE AT PETROLEUM REFINERIES
*K061 WASTE
•MINING WASTE EXCLUSION REINTERPRETATION
*MINING WASTE, K064, AND 3004(x)
*PRODUCT WASHWATERS FROM DINITROTOLUENE - Kill LISTING
ARE TANK BOTTOMS REMOVED FROM TANKS CONTAINING ONLY NAPHTHA DEEMED TO BE K052 HAZARDOUS WASTE?
ASH RESIDUE GENERATED FROM INCINERATION OF K045
CLARIFICATION ABOUT THE SCOPE OF EPA'S ADMINISTRATIVE STAY FOR A PORTION OF THE K069 HAZARDOUS WASTE LISTING
CLARIFICATION ON THE SCOPE OF K088
CLOSURE STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE LAND TREATMENT UNITS
COAL TAR DECANTER SLUDGE WASTE PILE (TOLEDO COKE)
COAL TAR DECANTER SLUDGE WASTE PILE (TOLEDO COKE)
COMMERCIAL FERTILIZERS CONTAINING K061 WASTES
CORRECTED LISTING DESCRIPTION FOR K062
DEFINITION .OF RCRA WASTE K050
DELISTING PETITIONS FOR K-WASTES MANAGED IN ON-SITE LAND-BASED UNITS-MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
DETERMINATION OF EQUIVALENT TREATMENT (DET) FOR 8 OF THE WASTE CODES FROM A TOLUENE DIISOCYANATE (TDI) TREATABILITY GROUP
DISTILLATION BOTTOM TARS AS K022 WASTE
EXCLUSIONS FOR K-WASTES DENIED (LACLEDE STEEL)
F006 LISTING DOES NOT INCLUDE ZINC PHOSPHATING WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES
GENERATION AND TREATMENT OF K044 WASTE
HAZARDOUS WASTE LISTING DETERMINATION (60 FR 7825, FEBRUARY 9, 1995) OF K156 WASTE FROM THE PRODUCTION OF METHYL CARBAMATE
INK FORMULATION WASTES AS BOTH K086 AND F001-005*WASTES
K-WASTE FILTER CAKE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF CEMENT
K001-LISTED WASTES FROM WOOD PRESERVING PROCESSES
K006 WASTES AND ON-SITE DISPOSAL UNIT CONTAINING THESE WASTES
K035 LISTING AND DELISTING ISSUES: GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
K051 SLUDGE RE-USED ON-SITE, EXEMPTION
K052 LISTING FOR WASTES GENERATED BY PETROLEUM INDUSTRY
K061 HAZARDOUS WASTE LISTING FOR STEEL FOUNDRIES
K061, EMISSION CONTROL DUST/SLUDGE FROM PRODUCTION OF STEEL IN ELECTRIC FURNACES
K062 - SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR LISTING
K062 LISTING APPLIES ONLY TO FACILITIES WITHIN THE IRON AND STEEL INDUSTRY
K103/K104 WASTE STREAMS - RELATIONSHIP OF CWA BAT, LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS, BOAT, AND DELISTING CRITERIA
LAND DISPOSAL OF UNTREATED HAZARDOUS WASTE
LIME SLUDGE IMPOUNDMENT SLUDGE, DELISTING OF
LIME STABILIZED WASTE PICKLE LIQUOR SLUDGE EXCLUSION
METAL, K061 WASTES IN SURFACE IMP9UNDMENT-DELISTING PETITION
NEW JERSEY ZINC COMPANY K061 STORAGE PILE
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR AMOCO REFINERY
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR ARCO PRODUCTS, WA
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR MARATHON PETROLEUM, IL
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR SHELL OIL, WA
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR SINCLAIR OIL, OK
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR STAR ENTERPRISE, DE
OIL/WATER EMULSIONS GENERATED BY PETROLEUM REFINERY WW SYSTEMS-K049 WASTE
PETROLEUM REFINERY WW, MIXTURE AND DERIVED-FROM RULES
PICKLE LIQUOR AND SCOPE OF K062 LISTING
PROPOSED BEST DEMONSTRATED AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY (BOAT) FOR K061 WASTE
RECYCLING OF ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE DUST
REGULATORY DETERMINATIONS UNDER RCRA ON THE STATUS OF ZINC OXIDE PRODUCED BY AN ELECTRIC ARC STEEL FURNACE
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR TANKS, VEHICLES, VESSELS, PROCESS OR MANUFACTURING UNITS, OR PIPELINES WHICH HAVE BEEN SHUT DOWN
REGULATORY STATUS OF CENTRIFUGE UNDERFLOW WASTES
9441.1984(13)
9444.1984(16)
9442.1994(02)
9444.1989(02b)
9441.1985(35)
9571.1986(04)
9441.1988(20)
9442.1995(04)
9441.1987(12)
9444.1994 (07)
9441.1989(47)
9476.1991(01)
9441.1987(98)
9441.1987(75)
9493.1986(05)
9444.1987(31a)
9444.1994 (04)
9433.1987(21)
9554.1994(06)
9444.1989(04)
9441.1989(48)
9444.1987(27)
9551.1988(12)
9441.1995(34)
9444.1987(41)
9441.1990(35)
9445.1985(05)
9444.1987(37)
9433.1987(27)
9494.1985(02)
9444.1981(03)
9444.1980(06)
9444.1983(02)
9444.1984(11)
9444.1987(08)
9433.1987(06)
9551.1990(04)
9484.1986(05)
9441.1987(74)
9433.1987(18)
9481.1988(01)
9551.1990(13)
9551.1990(08)
9551.1990(09)
9551.1990(11)
9551.1990(12)
9551.1990(10)
9441.1984 (35)
9441.1985(29)
9444.1985(17)
9441.1988(06)
9441.1988(27)
9444.1994(09)
9441.1995(15)
9444.1993(02)
05/30/84
08/30/84
02/28/94
03/31/89
10/30/85
07/30/86
05/30/88
05/25/95
03/03/87
09/19/94
08/25/89
05/02/91
12/24/87
09/04/87
09/11/86
07/30/87
06/03/94
09/28/87
10/24/94
07/13/89
09/12/89
07/06/87
11/04/88
11/27/95
09/15/87
12/21/90
01/18/85
08/19/87
12/11/87
07/30/85
06/06/81
12/02/80
07/11/83
07/27/84
03/16/87
04/02/87
10/03/90
05/23/86
09/02/87
08/07/87
01/25/88
11/08/90
10/24/90
11/06/90
11/07/90
11/08/90
11/07/90
12/07/84
08/23/85
10/03/85
03/09/88
06/15/88
12/19/94
04/20/95
04/20/93
-------
>? t I (i ,
::: g •!' ;
»i i
IMS!
;;; ^il- *
«
lii :; i! i !«! i • i! II
I!
ni:!!! Ijij :i
07/02/96
KEYWORD 1HDEX
;i I j ! [i
*^r -iS^*1* j-lj*!
RESIDUES FROM SECONDARY LEAD SMELTERS THAT RECYCLE K069 HASTES
SHAM INCINERATION AND TREATMENT OF K048-KOS2 HASTES IN CEMENT KILNS AND
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR DELISTING PETITION
ISPBNT PICKLE LIQUOR FINAL RULE REGARDING SCOPE OF THE K062 LISTING, .CORRECTION
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR, DEFINITION AS HAZARDOUS
iSTAINLESS STEEL PRODUCTION RESIDUES :
1 SUPERNATANT FORMED IN LIME STABILIZATION OF HASTE PICKLE LIQUOR AS HAZARDOUS HASTE
SUPERNATANT FROM TREATMENT OF SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR (K062) si ^ ,„=
: SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS HOLDING ONLY K-HASTES GENERATED UNDER A TEMPORARY EXCLUSION :; '.i V
: THERMAL OXIDIZER AND HYDRODBCHLORINAT10N PROCESS BY-PRODUCT K-WASTES -; !:
! USE/REUSE EXCLUSION TO RED WATER (K047) FROM WHICH SODIUM SULFITE IS RECOVERED AfcC WHICH ISilUSED ASi
: WASTES GENERATED BY COKE AND COAL TAR PLANTS
iWASTEWATER TREATMENT EFFLUENT FROM PROCESSES THAT GENERATE K001 AND F006 WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE
'WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM WOOD PRESERVING PROCESSES USING CREOSOTE AND/OR PENTACHLOROPHENOL
! HOOD PRESERVING AND SURFACE PROTECTION FACILITIES, CONTROLLING ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES FROM
WOOD TREATED WITH CREOSOTE, DISPOSAL OF
'. ZINC OXIDE RECLAIMED FROM KILNS
Off-Specification
*METHYL CHLOROFORM
'NATURAL GAS PIPELINE CONDENSATE AND ENERGY RECOVERY
BURNING OF USED OIL
CLARIFICATION OF DISCARDED AMMUNITION OF 0.50 CALIBER
CLARIFICATION ON HOW REUSE OF "WASTE RESINS" AS FEED STOCK TO MANUFACTURE NEW PRODUCTS ARE REGULATED UNDER;RCRA%;
REGULATORY STATUS OF NATURAL GAS PIPELINE CONDENSATE 3 -.-•;•.:-,--=-
REGULATORY STATUS OF RESIDUAL AVIATION FUELS THAT ARE BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY " f£':^.
THE STATUS OF UNUSED OFF-SPECIFICATION LEAD PLATES USED IN THE PRODUCTION OF LEAD-ACID AUTOMOTIVE BATTERIES
P-Wastes
*EPINEPHRINE RESIDUE IN A SYRINGE IS NOT P042 • 3ft
'ISOMERS OF P- AND U-LISTED WASTES
*NITROGLYCERIN PATCHES: NOT LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE WHEN DISCARDED UNUSED
'NITROGLYCERINE PILLS AS COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS
'OFF-SPECIFICATION PARAFORMALDEHYDE MEETS COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT LISTING
CARBON SCRUBBER WASTES IN WHICH PRODUCT MATERIALS ARE CAPTURED
CLARIFICATION ON THE APPLICABILITY OF THE DEBRIS STANDARDS TO P078 WASTES
DELISTING PETITION OF NITROGEN TETROXIDE RINSATE
DETERMINATION ON THE LEGALITY AND APPROPRIATENESS OF USING INCINERATION FOR TWO P078 WASTE STREAMS ;;Ks ~v5:
DISCARDED OFF-GAS PIPING, EQUIPMENT, AND OFF-GAS SCRUBBER SOLUTION FROM A TANK SYSTEM "jM Z~£-
EPA'S CURRENT CONTAINED-IN POLICY AS IT APPLIES TO ENVIRONMENTAL MEDIA THAT CONTAIN P- AND U-LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTES^:
p AND U-LISTED WASTES J!"
P-WASTE LISTING FOR CATALYST V
REQUIREMENTS FOR DISPOSAL OF DISCHARGED M-44 CYANIDE CAPSULES THAT ORIGINALLY CONTAINED A SODIUM CYANIDE PESTICIDE J
SPENT CARBON REGULATION S;
TRIPLE-RINSING REQUIREMENT APPLICABLE TO CONTAINERS HOLDING RESIDUES FROM THE INCINERATION OF ACUTE HAZARDOUS WASTES,
Page"Ma, 86
'' II
i
:
= •---=-. ---: ^ 7=- -_
I i;
J3
sf
III;!)
9434.1991(02)1
94J44 j
94'41.'1987;(39)"
94;41,il98a(07)i
9444.1987(47);
94:33.;i987:(23)|
94,41,1987(42)!
9442vl987(02);
94;44 .'1984 (10),
9444.1984(04)!
9441.1986(28)!
9441.1986(10)!
9444.1988(023)
9444
9443
9495
9443
9441
9442
9441
9441
9444
9444
9445
9444
9442
9444
9554
9433
9554
9442
9444
-9444,
9444
9442
9441
9431
1984(17)
1987(23)
1989(02)
19941(06)
1994:(19)
1994;(05)
199S:(04)
1995:(31)
,1994i(10)
,1995:(02)
,1995(01)
,1993(05)
.1994(03)
,1987(15)
.1994(01)
.1990(07)
,1994(05)
.1993(01)
.1995(01)
r!989(07)
.1981(02)
,1993(05)
.1987(37)
.1993(01)
08/05/91
03/29/91
04/26/9J1
;12/11/86
05/20/87
03/10/88
10/23/87
10/23/87
10/05/87
10/16/87
06/09/87
07/24/87
07/25/84
04/26/84
04/07/86
02/11/86
01/26/88
08/30/84
10/30/87
10/17/89
11/03/94
07/11/94
04/15/94
02/02/95
09/14/95
12/31/94
09/30/95
04/30/95
09/30/93
03/31/94
05/18/87
01/04/94
12/21/90
07/26/94
09/20/93
02/17/95
08/21/89
06/19/81
12/23/93
05/18/87
07/28/93
Sole Active Ingredient ~
*EPINEPHRINE RESIDUE IN A SYRINGE IS NOT P042
*NITROGLYCERIN PATCHES: NOT LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE WHEN DISCARDED UNUSED
CARBAMATE LISTING DETERMINATION (60 FR 7824, FEBRUARY 9, 1995) AS IT RELATES TO THE LATEX PROCESS WASTES GENERATED BY A COMPANY
CHLORDANE AND HEPTACHLOR PESTICIDE WASTE
DISCARDED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS
P-WASTE LISTING FOR CATALYST
PESTICIDE STANDARDS FOR FORMALDEHYDE AND PARAFORMALDEHYDE
PESTICIDES CONTAINING A 261.33 (e) COMPOUND AS A SOLE ACTIVE INGREDIENT I
REQUIREMENTS FOR DISPOSAL OF DISCHARGED M-44 CYANIDE CAPSULES THAT ORIGINALLY CONTAINED A SODIUM CYANIDE PESTICIDE !
REOUIR
9444
9445
9441
9444
9444
9444
9444
9444
9442
1994(10)
,1995(01)
,1995(28)
.1988(10)
,1988(12)
.1981(02)
.1989(02)
,1981(05)
.1993(05)
12/31/94
04/30/95
08/24/95
05/03/88
05/19/88
06/19/81
03/14/89
09/18/81
12/23/93
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 87
Steel Foundries
*K061 WASTE
DELISTING PETITION-STEEL FACILITY, REQUIREMENTS FOR CLOSURE PLAN
DELISTING TESTING REQUIREMENTS, CYANIDE AND OTHER WASTES, STEEL INDUSTRY
K061 HAZARDOUS WASTE LISTING FOR STEEL FOUNDRIES
K062 LISTING APPLIES ONLY TO FACILITIES WITHIN THE IRON AND STEEL INDUSTRY
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY PRODUCTION OF STEEL IN ELECTRIC ARC FURNACES
SLUDGE WASTE HANDLING IF TEMP. EXCLUSION IS WITHDRAWN / FUTURE METALS RECOVERY-STEEL FACILITY
WASTE-DERIVED FUELS AT IRON AND STEEL MILLS AS PRODUCTS OR WASTE FUELS, INFORMATION REQUIRED
Toluene
•SOLVENT MIXTURE RULE
•SOLVENT MIXTURE RULE APPLIED TO SPILL OF TOLUENE/BENZENE MIXTURE - CERCLA INTERFACE
FILTER CAKE WASTE CONTAINING SOLVENT USED TO SOLUBILIZE PRODUCT
PAINT SPRAY BOOTH AIR FILTERS
RESIDUE FROM STREAM-STRIPPING OF PROCESS WASTE CONTAINING TOLUENE
SOIL CONTAMINATED WITH TOLUENE
STILL BOTTOM WASTE FROM POLYSTYRENE PRODUCTION
STILL BOTTOM WASTE GENERATED BY A POLYSTYRENE PRODUCTION FACILITY
SUBSTITUTION OF EXTRACTION SOLVENTS FOR METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TOLUENE AS A DILUANT OR CARRIER AND THE SCOPE OF THE F005 LISTING
TOLUENE-LADEN FILTER RESIDUE GENERATED FROM AN INK PRODUCTION PROCESS
WASTE INK AND SOLVENT MIXTURES GENERATED FROM PRINTING FACILITIES
U-Wastes
*ISOMERS OF P- AND U-LISTED WASTES
•METHYL CHLOROFORM
•OFF-SPECIFICATION PARAFORMALDEHYDE MEETS COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT LISTING
ACRYLONITRILE ASH
CARBAMATE LISTING DETERMINATION (60 PR 7824, FEBRUARY 9, 1995) AS IT RELATES TO THE LATEX PROCESS WASTES GENERATED BY A COMPANY
CONTAINERS USED TO HOLD LISTED CHEMOTHERAPY DRUGS
DETERMINATION OF EQUIVALENT TREATMENT (DET) FOR 8 OF THE WASTE CODES FROM A TOLUENE DIISOCYANATE (TDI) TREATABILITY GROUP
DISCARDED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS
DISCARDED OFF-GAS PIPING, EQUIPMENT, AND OFF-GAS SCRUBBER SOLUTION FROM A TANK SYSTEM
EPA'S CURRENT CONTAINED-IN POLICY AS IT APPLIES TO ENVIRONMENTAL MEDIA THAT CONTAIN P- AND U-LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTES
MIXED SOLVENT WASTES
MIXTURES OF LISTED AND CHARACTERISTIC WASTES
P AND U-LISTED WASTES
WASTE GENERATED BY AN INCINERATOR TRIAL BURN OF SAND SPIKED WITH TR1CHLOROBENZENE AND HEXACHLOROETHANE
Wastewater Treatment Sludge
•F006 SLUDGE FROM ACID WASTE MIXTURE
•MIXTURE EXCLUSION
•PETROLEUM REFINERY WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE CLASSIFICATION
DELISTING PETITION - FUJI PHOTO FILM WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE
METAL FINISHING SLUDGES
PETROLEUM REFINERY SLUDGE REGULATIONS
REGULATORY STATUS OF SILVER-CONTAINING WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES WHEN RECYCLED
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS/LAND TREATMENT UNITS REGULATION IF ASSOCIATED WWT SLUDGES ARE LISTED
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES RESULTING FROM METAL CLEANING PROCESS
9444.1989(02b)
9433.1986(07)
9433.1984 (06)
9444.1980(06)
9444.1987(08)
9444.1986(02)
9433.1986(17)
9441.1986(08)
9441.1987(18)
9443.1985(11)
9444.1987(43)
9442.1990(01)
9441.1984 (10)
9445.1985(01)
9444.1987(38)
9432.1988(01)
9441.l'988(25)
9444.1987(36)
9444.1985(09)
9443.1984 (08)
9444.1995(02)
9444.1984 (17)
9442.1994(03)
9444.1985(12)
9441.1995(28)
9441.1987(45)
9554.1994(06)
9444.1985(05)
9442.1993(01)
9444.1995(01)
9444.1988(02)
9441.1987(68)
9444.1989(07)
9441.1988(04)
9441.1987(11)
9441.1990(34)
9444.1991(01)
9433.1991(01)
9444.1988(01)
9444.1990(05)
9441.1993(06)
9480.1985(02)
9444.1989(08)
03/31/89
03/18/86
12/18/84
12/02/80
03/16/87
01/27/86
09/30/86
01/24/86
03/30/81
11/30/85
10/09/87
05/03/90
05/15/84
04/05/85
09/01/87
02/11/88
06/09/88
08/17/87
06/03/85
11/23/84
09/30/95
08/30/84
03/31/94
05/30/85
08/24/95
06/16/87
10/24/94
05/14/8B
09/20/93
02/17/95
01/20/88
08/19/87
08/21/89
01/14/88
02/28/87
11/01/90
02/01/91
03/07/91
01/11/88
10/17/90
04/29/93
07/17/85
08/21/89
LOCATION
(See Siting)
XREF
-------
!i I-' i I 4 1(3 ! i J,i "i
HI i IE ?I« i « Mia .
' •> iiF;' • « !(ff > ( I'1" ;
11 i 1 ! i:i : ifcif ill i i i: ib ! !! tr
HI!:!
07/02/96
KEYWORD IWDKX
. 8«
r
i ;
LOSS OF INTERIM STATUS* f. . -! -- . . " _ ; , j
JSee- Jnterim Status,Process) (See also Permit Process)
LOW LBVEL WASTE: ; " '
(See Mixed Haste), i ! ! i : iili _i
MAJOR HANDLERS ;
MAJOR HANDLERS OF HW - DEFINITION ,
MANAGEMENT STANDARDS : : : ;:
(See Used Oil) , I ! =
MANIFEST
(See Generators) (See also Transporters, DOT, Waste Minimization)
MANUFACTURING PROCESS UNITS „
(See Hazardous Waste Identification) -
MARKETER
(See Used Oil)
MERCURY ; i ; .
(See Hazardous Waste Identification); i!
METALS
:XREF!
1 ij I \
(See also Hazardous Waste Identification) -.•- ! ; : ! N i i
*REGULATORY STATUS OF METALS RECOVERY UNDER RCRA ' I I != ' !
ALTERNATIVE METALS ANALYSIS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE COMBUSTORS '.•-''.
METALS PRODUCTION WASTES, APPLICABILITY OF MINING WASTE EXCLUSION - COMBUSTION OF WASTES AS INCINERATION: ••- i
RCRA POLICY STATEMENT: LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS' DILUTION PROHIBITION AND COMBUSTION OF INORGANIC METAL-BEARING
SLUDGE WASTE HANDLING IF TEMP. EXCLUSION IS WITHDRAWN / FUTURE METALS RECOVERY-STEEL FACILITY ;
MINERAL PROCESSING \
(See also Mining Waste)
*DEFINITION OF FORMERLY BEVILL EXEMPT WASTE
MINERAL PROCESSING FACILITIES, REPORT TO CONGRESS ;
MINING WASTE EXCLUSION INCLUDING PRIMARY PROCESSING BUT NOT SUBSEQUENT STEPS
MINIMUM SHELL THICKNESS
(See Tank System)
MINIMUM TECHNOLOGICAL REQUIREMENTS (MTR) |
(See also Compatibility, HSWA, Land Disposal Facilities, Release, Surface Impoundment, TSDFs) I
TING UNITS AND MINIMUM TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS
!; {
---r :i r i :i
: HAZARDOUS
^^^TI
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF N ! ' / / *
9498.1994(10) 10/31/94
9498.1994i(09) 08/17/94
9441.1985(05) 02/04/85
WASTES i 9551.01-01 05/23/94
1 9433.1986(17) : 09/30/86
1 XREF " ' / /
9441.1995(12); 03/31/95
9475.1989(01); i 02/09/89
1 9441.1986(81); i 11/03/86
XREF
i XREF i i / /
9487.1986(111^; 12/30/86
;(i^;
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No.
*LDR REQUIREMENTS DURING NATIONAL CAPACITY VARIANCE
COMMERCIAL MIXED LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE AND HAZARDOUS WASTE
EXISTING UNITS UNDER HSWA-APPLICABILITY OF MTR TO EXPANSIONS
MINIMUM TECHNOLOGICAL REQUIREMENTS WAIVER PETITION SECTION 3004 (0) (2) (SHELL OIL)
MTR COMPLIANCE DATES FOR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS (THERMEX ENERGY)
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, THERMEX ENERGY/RADIAN
REPLACEMENT UNIT, DEFINED - WASTE CONSOLIDATION FROM SEVERAL IMPOUNDMENTS
REPLACEMENT UNIT, DEFINITION, FOR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT
SUBTITLE C IMPERMEABLE CAP REQUIREMENT FOR ON-SITE CONTAINMENT OF WOOD PRESERVING WASTES
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT RETROFITTING REQUIREMENTS
TC RULE HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION
VERTICAL EXPANSION AT U.S. ECOLOGY'S TRENCH 10, BEATTY, NEVADA FACILITY
Double Liner
*RETROFITTING INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
STANDARDS AGAINST WHICH 3004 (o) (2) EQUIVALENCY PETITION SHOULD BE COMPARED - DOUBLE LINER
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT RETROFITTING AND TIME ALLOWED FOR CLOSURE
UCAPCO APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE UNDER 3004 (c) (2) OF RCRA
""^LINERS^D'LEAK'DETECTION'SYS^MS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE LANDFILLS, SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, AND WASTE PILES
LINER/LEACHATE COLLECTION SYSTEM COMPATIBILITY
SECONDARY LEACHATE COLLECTION AND REMOVAL SYSTEMS - FML TOP LINERS
SOLIDTEK LANDFILL/LINER DESIGN
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT RETROFITTING AND TIME ALLOWED FOR CLOSURE
UCAPCO APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE UNDER 3004 (c) (2) OF RCRA
Liners
*EXISTING SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS WITH LINERS
'LEAK NOTIFICATION AT A DOUBLE-LINED SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT
*LINERSDANDGLEAKIDETECTION SYSTEMS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE LANDFILLS, SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, AND WASTE PILES
•RETROFITTING FOR PERMITTED SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
*WASTE PILE LINERS - MTR (264.251)
CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW LANDFILL CELL AND THE OMNIBUS PROVISION
DESIGN AND OPERATING STANDARDS
HSWA MINIMUM TECH REQUIREMENTS FOR LINERS AND LEACHATE COLLECTION SYSTEMS
LINER DESIGN COMMENTS (CWM, EMELLE.AL)
SOLIDTEK LANDFILL/LINER DESIGN
STANDARDS FOR SECONDARY CONTAINMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TANK SYSTEMS
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
VARIANCE FROM 264 LANDFILL LINER & LEACHATE COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS
Retrofit
•CHANGES DURING INTERIM STATUS - CORRECTION
•RETROFITTING FOR PERMITTED SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
•RETROFITTING SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
ALTERNATE CONCENTRATION LIMIT (ACL) POLICY FOR HSWA PROVISIONS
CLARIFICATION OF THE REGULATORY STATUS OF A REFINERY DITCH SYSTEM
^ DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS, BDAT, AND DELISTING CRITERIA
9551.1990(16)
9487.1986(04)
9480.00-14
9432.1985(04)
9522.1988(03)
9484.1987(11)
9521.1987(01)
9484.1987(01)
9484;i986(01)
9554.1990(15)
9484.1987(02)
9441.1991(12)
9487.00-9
9528.1988(03)
9487.1986(11)
9523.00-12
9484.00-5a
9480.1987(02)
9484.1992(01)
9487.1986(10)
9484.1987(03)
9487.1985(08)
9523.00-12
9523.00-14
9484.00-5a
9480.1987(02)
9522.1984(02)
9484.1985(02)
9487.1985(043)
9484.1992(01)
9484.1987(09)
9485.1985(01)
9528.1986(01)
9487.1984(03)
9480.1985(01)
9487.1984(01)
9487.1985(08)
9483.1989(02)
9523.00-14
9523.00-12
9523.00-15
9487.1984(02)
9528.1988(05)
9484.1987(09)
9476.1986(04)
9481.1987(07)
9432.1994(02)
9571.1987(01)
9433.1987(06)
12/01/90
03/26/86
03/13/87
08/30/85
04/28/88
08/07/87
08/07/87
03/11/87
03/26/86
09/26/90
04/15/87
07/31/91
02/10/88
05/30/88
12/04/86
03/30/87
10/15/88
10/29/87
07/31/92
08/07/86
04/30/87
10/18/85
03/30/87
03/14/86
10/15/88
10/29/87
05/30/84
08/30/85
08/30/85
07/31/92
07/30/87
03/30/85
03/03/86
09/10/84
04/01/85
02/07/84
10/18/85
01/09/89
03/14/86
03/30/87
03/30/88
03/14/84
10/30/88
07/30/87
10/30/86
07/24/87
05/12/94
10/08/87
04/02/87
-------
:MS
07/02/96
KEYWORD
M [ i
Page Htt, 90
; NEUTRALIZATION) SURFACE IMPOWDHBHTS^'RETROFITTIHG: VARIWJCES r
; SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT RETROFITTING AHD TIME ALtQHED, IFOR CLOSURE -.
MINING HASTE
i I H U 1 i
(See also Exclusions) ',_ '__
•EXPLORATION OR PRODUCTION OF CRUDE OIL, NATURAL GAS, OR GEOTHERMAL ENERGY •» WASTE EXCLUSION = '-•
•MINING EXCLUSION FOR SMELTER SLAG
•MINING WASTE EXCLUSION REINTERPRETATION :
•MINING WASTE, K064, AND 3004 (x) • , .. .
•ORB AND MINERAL EXTRACTION, BENEFICIATION AND PROCESSING EXCLUSION APPLICABILITY "'._.--*
•POLLUTION CONTROL SLUDGE FROM TREATMENT OF MINING WASTE - EXCLUSION i " : V "
APPROPRIATENESS OF THE EP/TCLP SIMULATION OF CO-DISPOSAL SITUATION FOR MINING WASTES
CHARACTERISTIC TESTS FOR DETERMINING THE HAZARDOUS CHARACTERISTICS OF MINING WASTES : I •;-','' -----
DECISION DEADLINES FOR RETROFITTING WAIVER REQUESTS ; !"' '• : ; ;
DROSS FROM ALUMINUM SMELTING USED IN MANUFACTURE OF CEMENT : ' ' * ' ; ;
INDUSTRIAL FURNACES BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTES AND THE RESIDUALS GENERATED (LOUISIANA REG) "
METALS PRODUCTION WASTES, APPLICABILITY OF MINING WASTE EXCLUSION - COMBUSTION OF HASTES AS INCINERATION 1
MINERAL PROCESSING RESIDUALS FROM COMBUSTION UNITS BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL
MINING LABORATORY WASTES UNDER 40 CFR 261.4 (b) (7) - EXCLUSION OF
MINING HASTE AS NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE
MINING WASTE REGULATED UNDER SUBTITLE D RATHER THAN SUBTITLE C
SECONDARY MATERIALS RECYCLED IN PHOSPHORIC ACID RECIRCULATING SYSTEMS , :
Bevill Amendment
•DEFINITION OF FORMERLY BEVILL EXEMPT WASTE :
•NEH WASTES NOT COVERED BY BEVILL EXCLUSION \ : .
APPLICABILITY OF MINING WASTE EXCLUSION TO WASTED LIME KILN REFRACTORY BRICKS
BERYL PLANT AND RAFPINATE DISCARD CLASSIFICATION
; BEVILL AMENDMENT APPLIED TO COAL GASIFICATION FACILITY ''. :
; CHLORIDE-ILMENITE PROCESS WASTES ' -..-.-.
'- CLARIFICATION OF RCRA REGULATORY APPLICATION TO SOILS CONTAMINATED BY CEMENT KILN DUST I, ,
CLARIFICATION OF REGULATION OF FUEL BLENDING AND RELATED TREATMENT AND STORAGE ACTIVITIES
; INTERPRETATION OF THE BEVILL EXEMPT STATUS OF WASTES AT THE MAGCORP FACILITY r
IRON AND STEEL SLAGS, REGULATORY STATUS
I MINING WASTE EXCLUSION FOR A FERROALLOY FACILITY : ! ! : i1 :
MINING WASTE EXCLUSION INCLUDING PRIMARY PROCESSING BUT NOT SUBSEQUENT STEPS : ":
MINING WASTES FROM SEARLES LAKE OPERATIONS
REGULATORY STATUS OF SOLID WASTE GENERATED FROM GOLD/MERCURY AMALGAM RETORTING L
SCOPE OF BEVILL AMENDMENT AS IT APPLIES TO PHOSPHATE MINING, PHOSPHORIC ACID PRODUCTION, AND ANCILLARY FACILITIES
SHAM INCINERATION AND TREATMENT OF K048-K052 WASTES IN CEMENT KILNS AND INDUSTRIAL FURNACES !
; TREATMENT STANDARDS AND THE SEVILLE EXCLUSION : :
Boiler Slag
•MINING EXCLUSION FOR SMELTER SLAG
Coal :
BEVILL AMENDMENT APPLIED TO COAL GASIFICATION FACILITY :
COAL ASH AS A SOLID WASTE
PRECIPITATION WHICH IS CORROSIVE DUE TO CONTACT WITH EXEMPT WASTES (COAL GASIFICATION ASH)
RESIDUAL WATER DERIVED FROM AN EXEMPT WASTE (COAL ASH) IS EXEMPT
RETORTED OIL SHALE AND COAL FLY ASH
Energy Exploration Waste j
•EXPLORATION OR PRODUCTION OF CRUDE OIL, NATURAL GAS, OR GEOTHERMAL ENERGY - WASTE EXCLUSION '
; *REGULATORY STATUS OF NATURAL GAS CONDENSATE ; i
ATORY STATUS OF WASTE FROM OIL GATHERING PIPELINES
9484,1986(04} 04/21/86
9484.00-Sa 10/15/88
•^MTLAT
_XREF
9441.1984(11)
9441.1984(23)
9441.1985(35)
: 9571. 1986 (04):
9571.1989(011)
,9441.1985(09:)
:9571. 1985(01)
9443.1985(09)
9571.1987(01)
<9441. 1989(01);
9494.1987(02)
"59441.1985(05),,
f "9441.1984(191
9441.1984(09) [
\ "9441.1986 (72)!!
^9441.1986(55)::
:»:9571.1990(05)::
^9441.1995(12)
5^9571.1989(02):;
9441.1994(11)
9571.1990(01)
9441.1987(76)!,
9441.1991(05),
9441.1993(16) ;
9498.1994(13) 1
9441.1994(05):
9571.1990(04)::
9441. 1986 (48);:
9441.1986(81);
9441.1993(12)
9441.1993(04);'
- 9441.1992(10)!;
- 9494. 1991 (02) u.
9554.1990(10) :
9441.1984(23) '
1' 9441. 1987(76) V
9571.1990(02)
9441.1986(31) !
-t.9441. 1986(49)1;
9571.1990(03) ;;
11
-9441.1984(11) ;:
==9571.1993(01) 1
9441. 1992 (Q||^
/ /
04/30/84
07/31/84
10/30/85
07/30/86
01/30/89
02/28/85
10/03/85
10/03/85
10/08/87
02/07/89
04/15/87
02/04/85
08/15/84
05/09/84
09/16/86
07/16/86
06/27/90
03/31/95
10/30/89
05/11/94
03/15/90
09/15/87
04/22/91
09/15/93
12/05/94
03/23/94
05/30/90
06/10/86
11/03/86
06/30/93
04/26/93
05/15/92
03/29/91
08/23/90
07/31/84
09/15/87
04/09/90
04/21/86
06/16/86
04/06/90
04/30/84
07/30/93
01/31/92
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No.
CLARIFICATION OF CERTAIN ISSUES REGARDING OIL AND GAS WASTES
SFICATION Z&^^™r£™^^%£%^ OF WASTES GENERATED AT EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION FACILITIES
CL^SIF™ON OF^ASTE FLUIDS ASSOCIATED WITH CLEAN UP OF CRUDE OIL LEAKS IN ACTIVE OIL FIELDS
DRILLING OPERATIONS, EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN WASTE FROM
Fossil Fuels
*FOSSIL FUEL COMBUSTION WASTE EXCLUSION
*MINING EXCLUSION FOR SMELTER SLAG
'STATUS OF FOSSIL FUEL COMBUSTION WASTE EXCLUSION
Large Volume Waste
BEVILL AMENDMENT APPLIED TO COAL GASIFICATION FACILITY
MISCELLANEOUS UNITS
(See Subpart X)
MIXED RADIOACTIVE WASTES
(See Mixed Waste)
MIXED RADIOACTIVE/RADIOACTIVE WASTES
(See Mixed Waste)
MIXED WASTE
*MIXED WASTE AND LAND BAN
(II)-FERRATE (II), USED AT A DOE NUCLEAR PLANT, CONSIDERED A "MIXED WASTE" UNDER RCRA?
MIXED WASTE REGULATION
MIXTURES OF. LISTED AND CHARACTERISTIC WASTES
PERCHLOROETHYLENE AND SURFACTANT, DISTILLATION OF RESIDUE CONTAINING
USED OIL BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY, INTERPRETATION OF SUBPART E
WASTES FROM STORAGE OF PETROLEUM PRODUCTS
Atomic Energy Act (AEA)
BYPRODUCT MATERIAL AND MIXED WASTE, AEA AND DOE INTERFACE
BYPRODUCT MATERIAL, DEFINITION OF
HIGH-LEVEL TRANSURANIC, AND LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE MIXED WASTE
^ISDICTION AND REGULATION OF MIXED WASTE MANAGEMENT INCLUDING INCINERATION AND LOCATION CRITERIA
By-Product
BRASS DROSS SKIMMINGS, SEPARATION OF METALS AND OXIDES, BY-PRODUCT
BY-PRODUCT CRUDE OIL TANK BOTTOMS
DISTILLATION OR FRACTIONATION COLUMN BOTTOMS FROM THE PRODUCTION OF CHLOROBENZENE
DROSS FROM ALUMINUM SMELTING USED IN MANUFACTURE OF CEMENT
DROVE RECLAMATION IN BRASS INDUSTRY, BY-PRODUCT DESIGNATION
METAL GALVANIZING PROCESS RESIDUES AS BY-PRODUCTS/SECONDARY MATERIALS
ON-SITE INCINERATION OF A WASTE THAT IS BOTH A BY-PRODUCT MATERIAL AND HAZARDOUS
Mixed Radioactive Wastes
*LEAD USED AS SHIELDING IN LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL
E^CR^LMD^POSAL^ElTRICTIONS OF TWO METHODS OF MACROENCAPSULATION FOR MIXED WASTES AT ROCKY FLATS
9571.1993(02)
9441.1989(27a)
9441.1988(48a)
9441.1991(05a)
9441.1980(03)
9441.1986(16)
9441.1984(23)
9441.1995(16)
11/05/93
06/06/89
11/21/88
05/21/91
09/04/80
02/28/86
07/31/84
04/30/95
9441.1987(76) 09/15/87
XREF
XREF
XREF
9551
9443
9441
9441
9441
9441
9495
9444
.1989(02)
.1988(03)
.1995(30)
.1987(102)
.1987(68)
.1985(10)
.1989(01)
.1980(03)
9441.1986(46)
9432.1986(10)
9441.1987(41)
9541.1986(14)
9441
9441
9432
9441
9441
9441
9441
9432
.1985(21)
.1986(37)
.1986(10)
.1988(11)
.1989(01)
.1989(15)
.1989(14)
.1986(14)
9441.1992(12)
9431.1988(02)
9554.1994(03)
03/30/89
03/22/88
09/13/95
07/30/87
08/19/87
04/10/85
05/15/89
11/17/80
06/02/86
04/12/86
06/01/87
07/03/86
06/06/85
05/01/86
04/12/86
04/21/88
02/07/89
04/05/89
04/02/89
09/06/86
05/31/9J
01/30/88
02/16/91
-------
re;!!:1:! * «' a !sl s ; i !! at i: s MM si:: i\-r •
B j " "="
:S n Oi i;i
:i
HI s itr j = f a : - JH i ti i P
;«i
: I :«=:<:< I :• MM HI
Ml Ii MM Mi
•Ml i i Mini ;:3;ihfih i
:»;iv i i : ,- .. :i - . . - .
i«N = = - ; : -= =- =1 ik - 11 i i a 5 n !
"sii;, ii M;I i :• i
"07/02/06
; g i!
KEYHQHD INDEX
- -- - —= : *—
in
APPLICABILITY, OF A FPROPOSBD HAZARDOOS! HASTE REGUl*rtOH TOi-CERTAiH DOE RADIOACTIVE MIXED HASTES
BULKING AND CONSOLIDATING SHIPMEKTS OF COMPATIBLE HASTES HITU DIFFERENT HAZARDOUS CODES s
MATERIAL, iAND MIXED HASTE, ABA AND DOE INTERFACE
OF ,0 CFR SECTIO,
INTERIM STATUS REQUIREMENTS FOR NRC LICENSEES MANAGING RADIOACTIVE MIXED WASTE CLARIFICATION
•JURISDICTION AND REGULATION OF MIXED WASTE MANAGEMENT INCLUDING INCINERATION AND LOCATION CRITERIA
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS EFFECT ON STORAGE/DISPOSAL OF COMMERCIAL MIXED WASTE
MANAGEMENT OF MIXED WASTE
MIXED RADIOACTIVE HOSPITAL HASTES AND THE DOMESTIC SEWAGE EXCLUSION
MIXED HASTE (DOE FACILITIES) , DEFINITION OF
MIXED HASTE DISPOSAL FROM RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS ; '
MIXED WASTE MANAGEMENT: NORTHWEST INTERSTATE COMPACT
ON-SITE INCINERATION OF A WASTE THAT IS BOTH A BY-PRODUCT MATERIAL AND HAZARDOUS
RADIOACTIVE WASTE EXEMPTION IN NORTH AND SOUTH CAROLINA
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION OF SPENT NUCLEAR REACTOR FUELS
RECYCLED GASOLINE/HATER AND FUEL OIL/HATER MIXTURES
REGULATION OF HAZARDOUS COMPONENTS OF RADIOACTIVE MIXED WASTE
REGULATION OF RADIOACTIVE MIXED WASTE AT DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FACILITIES =
SCINTILLATION COUNTING COCKTAIL ','.:
SCINTILLATION VIALS CONTAINING D001 HASTES, MANAGEMENT OF ':|
SMALL- VOLUME MIXED HASTE LABORATORY GENERATED MATERIALS AND LEAD
STATE AUTHORIZATION AND REGULATION OF RADIOACTIVE MIXED WASTES
STATE AUTHORIZATION TO REGULATE HAZARDOUS COMPONENTS OF RADIOACTIVE MIXED WASTES
STATE PROGRAM ADVISORY »2 - RCRA AUTHORIZATION TO REGULATE MIXED WASTE "
TC APPLICABILITY TO MIXED WASTE
TREATMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES AT HAZARDOUS WASTE PERMITTED TSDF
TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR CERTAIN MIXED RADIOACTIVE WASTES • i
Mixed Radioactive/Radioactive Wastes : :
DIOXIN-CONTAINING LABORATORY WASTE WITH RADIOACTIVE PROPERTIES ; i '
JOINT NRC-EPA GUIDANCE ON AN APPROACH FOR COMMERCIAL MIXED LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE AND HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES
LIQUID SCINTILLATION COCKTAIL SOLUTION PRODUCT, READY SAFE
MIXED WASTE REGULATION - RCRA REQUIREMENTS VS. NRC REQUIREMENTS ;
ON-SITE INCINERATION OF A WASTE THAT IS BOTH A BY-PRODUCT MATERIAL AND HAZARDOUS
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL METHODS FOR LOW-LEVEL WASTES THAT CONTAIN UNCONTAMINATED OR RADIOACTIVE LEAD
NRC
9482.1991(01) i
9461.1985(01)
9441, 1986 (IS} ,
! 9480.00-14 i I
9502.1986(09)
1 ii9554.199S(02) !
! ::9441.1987(41) •
!!9528.1989(13) !
19541,1986(14) '.
1^9555.00-01 :
'59441.1992(07) '
;!9441.1986(94) '
|t9503.1985(01) I
! ":9554.1988(04) i
: •19441.1992(15) =
'3432. 1986 (14) !
9541.1984(08) ;
! !;9442.1993(04) '
119441. 1986(22)
'• -9541.1986(19) «
i:9528.1987(14) '
: '19443.1987(04) i
!9525. 1986(04) '
•9551.1988(07) -•
•9541.1987(04) :
; '9541.1986(20) :
; :9541.00-6 '
9441.1991(02)
\ !9525. 1990(02) i
; :9554. 1990(14) \
1 !9441. 1985(26) '
i 19487.00-8
j 19443.1988(02) j
(9451.1989(02) i
: ;9432. 1986(14) i
1 (9441.1987(52) !
09/02/94
09/19/85
06/02/86
03/13/87
05/08/86
s 09/19/95
06/01/87
10/15/89
07/03/86
09/28/90
03/31/92
12/19/86
05/10/85
06/13/88
06/03/92
09/06/86
09/13/84
11/22/93
03/19/86
10/14/86
11/12/87
03/11/87
08/11/86
06/13/88
06/29/87
10/20/86
07/30/87
02/12/91
10/17/90
12/27/90
07/05/85
08/03/87
01/13/88
06/26/89
09/06/86
06/26/87
COMBINED NRC-EPA SITING GUIDELINES FOR DISPOSAL OF COMMERCIAL MIXED LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE AND HAZARDOUS WASTE
MIXED WASTE REGULATION - RCRA REQUIREMENTS VS. NRC REQUIREMENTS
SCINTILLATION COUNTING COCKTAIL
STATE AUTHORIZATION AND REGULATION OF RADIOACTIVE MIXED WASTES
MIXTURE RULE
(See also Derived-From-Rule)
•DILUTION OF F003 WASTES
*GENERATOR STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO TRANSPORTERS
*HAZARDOUS WASTE I.D.
*HAZARDOUS WASTE LISTED SOLELY FOR SUBPART C CHARACTERISTICS
•MIXTURE EXCLUSION
•MIXTURE RULE - DISCHARGES TO WASTEWATER
•MIXTURES OF USED OIL AND CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE
•SOLVENT DRIPPINGS FOR DECREASING OPERATIONS
1 DRIPPINGS FROM DECREASING OPERATIONS
ii
*^MENT
9480.00-14 i 03/13/87
9451.1989(02) ; 06/26/89
9443.1987(04) ! 03/11/87
9541.1987(04) '- 06/29/87
XREF
9441.
9453.
9441.
9441.
9441.
9522.
9443.
'9441.
9443.
1986(97)
1989(01)
1988(14)
1986(74)
1990(34)
1987(02)
1993(02)
1987(19.
1987 (
12/30/86
; 04/30/89
04/30/88
[ 09/30/86
I 11/01/90
! 12/30/87
I 02/28/93
03/30/87
04/30/87
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page Ho.
M™ RUL^ APPLIED TO SPILL OF TOLUENE /BENZENE MIXTURE - CERCLA INTERFACE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE CONTAINED IN A SAND-METAL-SOLVENT MIXTURE
ACETONE AND METHANOL CONTAMINATED WASHWATERS
ASBESTOS AS A HAZARDOUS WASTE
ASH RESIDUE GENERATED FROM INCINERATION OP K045
NNG PETROLEUM PRODUCTS FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
CARBON REGENERATION FACILITY, MIXTURE OF SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTES (CALGON)
CHARACTERIZATION OF WASTE STREAMS FROM POLYMERIC COATING OPERATIONS •
CLOSURE PLAN FOR THE HAZARDOUS WASTE STORAGE UNITS AT VBRTAC'S SHUTDOWN MANUFACTURING PLANT
CoSsivf STRENGTH ^TREATED WASTES - USE OF SW-846 METHODS, WASTE IDENTIFICATION
DELISTING ACTION - STATUS OF HOLLOMAN AIR FORCE BASE
DELISTING CRITERIA/LEACHATE LEVELS
DEPLETED MIXTURES OF ETHYLENE GLYCOL AND WATER FROM HEAT EXCHANGERS
ELECTROPLATING RINSEWATERS NOT IN F007-009 LISTINGS
ENVIRONMENTAL MEDIA CONTAMINATED WITH RCRA-LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE
EXCLUSION FROM REGULATION FOR CHARACTERISTIC AND LISTED WASTES - LEACHATE LEVELS
F SOLVENT WASTES
GENERATION AND TREATMENT OF K044 WASTE
HAZARDOUS CHARACTERISTIC - BASIS FOR LISTING
™ spZs! ™™GAL DISCHARGES OF LISTED WASTES TO SURFACE WATERS, MIXTURE RULE APPLIED TO
MANAGEMENT OF WASTES PRIOR TO INTRODUCTION INTO SEWER
METHANOL RECOVERY SYSTEM - CLARIFICATION OF WASTE STATUS
MIXING OF METHANOL AS NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE
MIXTUREROFECHARACTERISTIC WASTE AND LISTED WASTE, ASH FROM INCINERATION
MIXTURE OF F003 AND A SOLID WASTE AND DELISTING REQUIREMENTS
MIX™E OF METHANOL AND SOLID WASTE WHICH DOES NOT EXHIBIT ANY CHARACTERISTICS
MIXTURE RULE CALCULATION - INCLUDING VOLATILIZED SOLVENT
MIXTURE RULE CALCULATION - INCLUDING VOLATILIZED SOLVENT
Mf/TuTs OF ££ "-° HALTED SOLELY BECAUSE IT EXHIBITS A CHARACTERISE
PAINT WASTES AND THE SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS
PESTICIDE APPLICATOR WASHING RINSE WATER
PESTICIDE APPLICATOR WASHING RINSEWATER
PETROLEUM REFINERY WW, MIXTURE AND DERIVED-FROM RULES
PROPER DISPOSAL OF SILVER NITRATE AND CHLOROFORM AS LABORATORY CHEMICALS
RAILROAD TIES AS HAZARDOUS WASTES UNDER THE MIXTURE RULE, SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR
REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE MIXING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLVENTS AND USED OIL
REGULATORY DETERMINATION - SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS AND THE MIXTURE RULE
RFrntATORY REQUIREMENTS PERTAINING TO THE MANAGEMENT OF WASTE SOLVENTS AND USED OIL
RECTORY ™ OF MSORBEN™ERIAL WHEN MIXED W!TH HAZARDOUS WASTE PRIOR TO INCINERATION
S A^S=TORWAS=ER TREATMENT TRAIN AND THE MIXTURE RULE
SECONDARY MATERIALS RECYCLED IN PHOSPHORIC ACID RECIRCULATING SYSTEMS
SOLVENT/MIXTURE BLENDS
SPENT FLUIDIZED BED MEDIA AND CHANGES UNDER INTERIM STATUS
9441.1987(18)
9443.1985(11)
9443.1989(07)
9444.1989(05)
9444.1980(05)
9441.1987(12)
9487.1986(07)
9441.1986(95)
9441.1986(33)
9442.1995(01)
9488.1987(01)
9445.1987(033)
9433.1987(16)
9433.1986(01)
9441.1989(42)
9441.1987(70)
9451.1986(01)
9444.1988(07)
9441.1989(30)
9441.1986(03)
9444.1985(03)
9551.1988(12)
9441.1984(32)
9441.1986(78)
9441.1994(16)
9441.1984(37)
9441.1986(07)
9441.1986(73)
9441.1987(46)
9471.1983(01)
9441.1981(06)
9441.1985(32)
9441.1987(65)
9441.1986(23)
9441.1987(28)
9441.1987(28)
9441.1987(06)
9441.1985(38)
9444.1987(17)
9441.1985(42)
9443.1985(05)
9441.1985(29)
9441.1993(01)
9441.1980(04)
9444.1980(02)
9441.1992(38)
9441.1992(21)
9441.1992(36)
9441.1992(29)
9441.1992(01)
9433.1986(11)
9571.1990(05)
9444.1988(06)
9444.1986(28)
9444.1985(15)
9441.1986(62)
9441.1984(30)
03/30/87
11/30/85
07/10/89
07/21/89
11/18/80
03/03/87
04/27/86
12/23/86
04/23/86
01/26/95
02/09/81
11/17/87
. 07/31/87
01/07/86
08/04/89
08/28/87
03/17/86
04/07/88
06/19/89
01/07/86
04/01/85
11/04/88
11/07/84
10/12/86
06/10/94
11/14/84
01/23/86
09/25/86
06/17/87
07/12/83
06/09/81
10/07/85
08/17/87
03/21/86
04/30/87
04/30/87
01/27/87
11/20/85
05/20/87
12/13/85
07/22/85
08/23/85
02/23/93
11/17/80
11/13/80
11/05/92
07/16/92
10/28/92
09/04/92
01/15/9J
04/24/86
06/27/90
03/31/88
12/05/86
06/24/85
08/19/8?
10/22/8^
-------
II
07/02/96
KEYWORD 1HDBX
Page Ho. 91
HASBHATERS CEHERATED FROM HASHING PESTICIDE APPLICATOR TRUCKS
SJflf/S!^750 BV "* rWCINERATORlTRIAL BURN OF SAND SPIKED HITH TRICHLOROBENZENE AND HBXACHLOROBTHANE
WASTES CONTAINING F001-F005 CONSTITUENTS < i
HASTEWATBR TREATMENT SYSTEM, SOLVENT RECOVERY STILL BOTTOMS IN 11 \ ' \ '.
MOBILE TREATMENT UNITS ; ,
(See also Permit Process, Permit Conditions)
'MOBILE HASTEWATER TREATMENT UNITS
MOBILE RECYCLING UNIT FOR REPROCESSING HASTE SOLVENTS
MOBILE SOLVENT RECYCLER, GENERATOR DETERMINATION FOR '
PROPOSED MECHANISM FOR HANDLING MOBILE TREATMENT UNITS
MODELS ;
SUBSURFACE FATE AND TRANSPORT MODEL :
MODIFICATIONS
(See Permit Process under Permit Modification)
MONITORING
(See Groundwater Monitoring)
MORE STRINGENT/BROADER IN SCOPE
(See State Authorization) ;:
MUNICIPAL LANDFILL
(See also Solid Haste) i ,
LEACHATE FROM A MUNICIPAL LANDFILL, REGULATION OF
REGULATORY STATUS AND MANAGEMENT OF LIQUIDS AND ABSORBENT MATERIALS CONTAINING LIQUIDS :
Sanitary Landfill ;
LEACHATE FROM A MUNICIPAL LANDFILL, REGULATION OF
NONHAZARDOUS LIQUID WASTEHATERS AND SLUDGES IN SANITARY LF UNDER RCRA AND HSWA DISPOSAL OF
SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS & LEACHATE FROM SANITARY LFs THAT RECEIVED HAZARDOUS HASTE _ _
MUNICIPAL HASTE COMBUSTION
(See also Incineration)
*REGULATION OF MUNICIPAL HASTE COMBUSTION ASH
I*™™1™ ™?!_MUNIC.IP^1' ™ASTB COMBUSTION ASH FROM HAZARDOUS HASTE REGULATION i
MINIMIZATION AND COMBUSTION STRATEGY ON OHIO'S REGIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF A'R REGULATIONS
9411.1986(4'!)
; [XREF
05/30/86
01/14/88i
02/22/88:
12/17/85'
06/30/87
04/16/86 I
08/06/86
01/29/82
9431.1991(01) 03/26/91
' ! I 19441.1918(05)
1 ' ' (9441.1985 (43U
' ?XREF!
f . 5943211987(05)
i ' 1944111986(30)
' ! i J9432U986(13)
1 : "9525.1982(01)
! n!
-iii
MUNICIPAL HASTE COMBUSTION RESIDUES-ASH AND SLUDGE •
MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTION, DISPOSAL OF RESIDUAL ASH
MUNICIPAL HASTE INCINERATOR ASH MANAGEMENT "I S
RESIDUES FROM U.S. NAVY SALVAGE FUEL BOILER i
REVISED IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY FOR CITY OF CHICAGO V. EOF MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTION (MWC) ASH SUPREME COURT (DECISION
MUNITIONS
I
.Hazardous Waste Identification)
: ; iXREF
i , -. IXREF :
; • • XREF
s ! 9441.1983(08)
! [I 9551.1993(04)
L ' - 9441.1983(08)
" ; ; 9574.1985(01)
1 L-L9444.1983I01)
1 XREF
". 9573.1991(01)
{ 9573.00-01
! 9573.1994(01)
9573.1990(02)
9443.1986(13)
i 9443.1987(06)
= 9573.1986(01)
; 9441.1987(16)
! 9441.1995(11)
! I XREF
10/21/83
11/17/93
10/21/83
01/22/85
06/10/83
05/01/91
09/18/92
01/10/94
03/29/90
05/27/86
04/08/87
06/27/86
03/17/87
03/22/95
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 9B
NATIONAL VARIANCE
(See Land Disposal Restrictions)
NATURAL GAS
•EXPLORATION OR PRODUCTION OF CRUDE OIL, NATURAL GAS, OR GEOTHERMAL ENERGY - WASTE EXCLUSION
*PRODUCED WATERS FROM NATURAL GAS EXPLORATION - EXCLUSION
*REGULATORY STATUS OF NATURAL GAS CONDENSATE
CLARIFICATION OF CERTAIN ISSUES REGARDING OIL AND GAS WASTES
REGULATORY STATUS OF DRIP GAS GENERATED ALONG NATURAL GAS TRANSMISSION PIPELINES
REGULATORY STATUS OF NATURAL GAS PIPELINE CONDENSATE
NEW UNIT
(See Construction)
NO-MIGRATION VARIANCE
(See Land Disposal Restrictions)
NONCOMPLIANCE
(See Data)
NONHAZARDOUS LIQUIDS
(See Liquid Waste)
NOTIFICATION
(See also Burning and Blending, EPA I.D. Number, Land Disposal Restrictions) (See Universal Wastes)
*LEAK NOTIFICATION AT A DOUBLE-LINED SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT
*NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR RECYCLABLE MATERIALS
*TANK REPLACEMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS AND STORAGE STANDARDS FOR MARKETERS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
BURNING OF USED OIL IN THE MARINE INDUSTRY AND USED OIL GENERATOR NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
DECISION NOT TO REQUIRE NOTIFICATION FROM GENERATORS WHO BURN SPECIFICATION USED OIL ON-SITE
INTERIM STATUS QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS TO HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL STORAGE FACILITIES, APPLIED
MARKETING OR BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL, NOTIFICATION OF
• NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR TREATABILITY STUDIES
PROPOSED PERMIT-BY-RULE FOR USED OIL RECYCLERS
RECYCLING ACTIVITIES
NPDES FACILITIES
(See Clean Water Act, Wastewater)
NRC
(See Mixed Waste)
OB/OD
(See Subpart X under Open Burning/Open Detonation)
XREF
XREF
9441.1984(11)
9441.1984(21)
9571.1993(01)
9571.1993(02)
9444.1993(03)
9442.1994(05)
04/30/84
07/31/84
07/30/93
11/05/93
09/09/93
04/15/94
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
9484
9441
9477
9494
9495
9495
9528
9494
9441
9495
9451
.1985(02)
.1988(13)
.1988(03)
.1986(05)
.1986(09)
.1987(05)
.1986(10)
.1986(01)
.1992(30)
.1986(30)
.1989(01)
XREF
XREF
XREF
08/30/85
04/30/88
07/30/88
04/11/86
04/21/86
03/26/87
11/13/86
02/09/86
09/09/92
11/24/86
05/03/89
-------
! 13! «»!! I Hi
I'-.f fcti lili li :s
l^rnKf*1 i«li P^I^'
'-HiklSrt^ Ifil — H^-i ylTi=p •! -E
07/02/96:
! H
i F -! =-= --N—** ^is-^ js
" ~
KEYWORD 1»BX
Page Wo; 96
OBTAINING INTERIM STATUS
Ms ii
(Sqe Interim Status lip;
OFF-SITE FACILITIES
- .5=: 1=3^ --I---. =- -^- T; r -- J- -~ I Ts I - . =; =
'ACCEPTANCE OF WASTE IN A PERMiTTED FA'rflLJTY i K ! i -".""" ,
'MANIFEST REQUIREMENTS AND THE OFF-SITE DEFINITION '- ' - • :-
'MANIFESTING REQUIREMENTS AND EPA IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS '- '
EPA I.D. NUMBER AND FACILITY LOCATION ' ': I- '
OFF-SPECIFICATION ' V = i
(See Listed Hazardous Waste) ' : M ~ ;
OILY WASTE ; !:
(See alao Hazardous Waste Identification)
'PETROLEUM REFINERY WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE CLASSIFICATION '
CLARIFICATION AND/OR RECONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS CONTAINED INJEPA'S FINAL RULE ON RECOVERED OIL
CLARIFICATION AS TO WHETHER DEWATERING IS A PROCESS THAT TRIGGERS EPA'S?USED OIL PROCESSOR REQUIREMENTS
DELISTING TESTING REQUIREMENTS, CYANIDE AND OTHER WASTES, STEEL INDUSTRY
EXCLUSION FROM REGULATION FOR CHARACTERISTIC AND LISTED WASTES - LEACHATE LEVELS
GENERATOR WITH RESPECT TO REGULATION OF OPERATIONAL WASTES FROM SHIPS, DEFINITION
METHODS 1310 AND 1330: EXTRACTION PROCEDURE AND EXTRACTION PROCEDURE FOR OILY WASTE
RETORTED OIL SHALE AND COAL FLY ASH
SAMPLING PLAN FOR DELISTING PETITION ADDRESSING HSWA REQUIREMENTS FOR ANALYZING FOR APPENDIX VIII COMPOUNDS
TCLP EXTRACTIONS APPLIED TO LIQUID WASTES, OILS AND SOLVENT-BASED PRODUCTS
OMNIBUS PROVISION
'CORRECTIVE ACTION AUTHORITIES
*THE OMNIBUS PROVISION AND PERMITS
CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW LANDFILL CELL AND THE OMNIBUS PROVISION
ECOLOTEC PERMIT REMAND ORDER AND USE OF THE OMNIBUS PROVISION
GUIDANCE ON TRIAL BURN FAILURES
PROPOSED RULES IMPACT ON PERMIT DEADLINES
ON-SITE WASTE MANAGEMENT
(See also Permit Process, Generators)
DELISTING PETITIONS FOR K-WASTES MANAGED IN ON-SITE LAND-BASED UNITS-MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
DELISTING POLICY ALLOWS EXCLUSION OF SEPARATE WASTE TREATMENT UNITS AT MULTI-UNIT FACILITIES
K006 WASTE AND ONSITE DISPOSAL UNIT CONTAINING THESE WASTES
OIL/WATER EMULSIONS GENERATED BY PETROLEUM REFINERY WW SYSTEMS-K04 9 WASTE
ON-SITE INCINERATION OF A WASTE THAT IS BOTH A BY-PRODUCT MATERIAL AND HAZARDOUS
ON-SITE TREATMENT BY GENERATORS UNDER 262.34
PERMIT ISSUES REGARDING ON-SITE TREATMENT BY FLUIDIZED BED INCINERATION
TEMPORARY EXCLUSION APPLIED TO ONLY ONE FACILITY (MONROE AUTO)
TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN GENERATOR'S ACCUMULATION TANKS :
OPEN BURNING/OPEN DETONATION (OB/OD) ;
ibpart X, Federal Facilities)
XREF
XREF E - " / /
9472.1983(02) 07/30/83
9452.19B9(02)• 09/30/89
9452.1990 (OHi 02/25/90
9461.1989(03) 08/18/89
XREF
XREF : ;
9444.1991(01) !
9441.1995(17) '
9592.1995(01)
9433.1984(06) "
9441.1986(03)
9432.1986(05) !
9443.1987(14) !
9571.1990(03) ~,
9433.1986(23) S
9442.1991(14) ,
XREF r
9502.1995(02) I
9520.1986(01) !
9528.1986(01) ?
9524.1989(02) !
9498.1994(04) [
— 9501.1987(03) -i
i
t
XREF :
9433.1987(21) ,
9433.1987(22) --
9432.1987(09) i
9441.1984(35) '
9432.1986(14) '
9453.1987(03) i
9522.1985(05) :
9441.1987(30) i
9453.1987(02) j
-i
/ /
02/01/91
05/03/95
08/10/95
12/18/84
01/07/86
02/05/86
08/11/87
04/06/90
12/30/86
10/29/91
/ /
02/28/95
02/28/86
03/03/86
03/02/89
07/05/94
12/28/87
/ /
09/28/87
10/02/87
08/19/87
12/07/84
09/06/86
07/01/87
12/13/85
04/30/87
03/25/87
XREF
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 97
OPERATING LIFE
(See Permit Conditions)
OSHA
(See also Health and Safety)
STANDARDS FOR AIR PATHWAY FOR METALS AND ORGANIC CHEMICALS
OWNER/OPERATOR
(See also Permit Application)
'CHANGES IN INTERIM STATUS - SELLING PART OF A FACILITY
'GENERATOR RESPONSIBILITIES: FACILITY OWNER/OPERATOR OR MOBILE RECYCLING UNIT OPERATOR
'MANUFACTURING PROCESS UNITS
'OWNER AND OPERATOR RESPONSIBILITIES DURING OPERATING LIFE AND CLOSURE
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS AND STORAGE STANDARDS FOR MARKETERS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
CONTAINERS STORING HAZARDOUS WASTE, REQUIREMENTS
CORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES
CORRECTIVE ACTION/PERMIT ISSUES - U.S. ARMY - ABERDEEN PROVING GROUNDS
LINER/LEACHATE COLLECTION SYSTEM COMPATIBILITY
OPERATOR AT DOE OAK RIDGE FACILITY, DETERMINATION OF
OPERATOR AT GOVERNMENT-OWNED CONTRACTOR-OPERATED (GOCO) FACILITIES
OWNER/OPERATOR UNDER RCRA AND CERCLA, DEFINITION OF
PERMIT ISSUES REGARDING ON-SITE TREATMENT BY FLUIDIZED BED INCINERATION
PERMITS ISSUED TO BOTH OWNERS AND OPERATORS IF DIFFERENT PEOPLE
P-WASTES
(See Listed Hazardous Waste)
PAINT FILTER TEST
(See also SW-846)
'LIQUIDS AND FREE LIQUIDS, DEFINITION OF
LIQUID HAZARDOUS WASTES IN LANDFILLS
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
Free Liquids
'CALIFORNIA LIST
'LIQUIDS AND FREE LIQUIDS, DEFINITION OF
*PH TESTING OF SOLID/WATER MIXTURE
'THE LIQUIDS IN LANDFILLS PROHIBITION AND SORBED FREE LIQUIDS
AQUEOUS SOLUTION, IGNITABILITY DEFINED
BAN ON USE OF LIQUIDS IN LANDFILLS
CHARACTERIZATION OF WASTE STREAMS FROM POLYMERIC COATING OPERATIONS
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF TREATED WASTES - USE OF SW-846 METHODS, WASTE IDENTIFICATION
LIQUID WASTE, DEFINITION OF
PAINT FILTER LIQUIDS TEST USED TO DETERMINE COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALIFORNIA LIST RESTRICTIONS
PCB-CONTAMINATED WASTES, STABILIZATION OF
SOLIDIFICATION OF CALIFORNIA LIST LIQUID WASTES AND THE DILUTION PROHIBITION
WASTE AS LIQUID OR SOLID, DETERMINATION OF
PAINT WASTE
(See Hazardous Waste Identification) (See also Listed Hazardous Waste, Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
XREF
XREF
9551.1991(04)
XREF
01/30/91
XREF
9528.1987(16)
9453.1984(03)
9441.1987(71)
9471.1984 (04)
9494.1986(05)
9482.1986(01)
9502.00-2
9502.1986(09)
9487.1986(10)
9432.1984(01)
9472.1987(01)
9432.1987(12)
9522.1985(05)
9522.1984 (03)
/ /
11/30/87
12/30/84
08/30/87
08/30/84
04/11/86
01/21/86
04/18/86
05/08/86
08/07/86
01/27/84
06/24/87
10/28/87
12/13/85
07/30/84
XREF
9432.1985(03)
9487.1985(04)
9523.00-14
9554.1987(03)
9432.1985(03)
9443.1983(03)
9487.1995(01)
9443.1985(02)
9487.1986(07)
9442.1995(01)
9445.1987(033)
9432.1981(01)
9553.1987(15)
9487.1988(01)
9551.1987(23)
9445.1984(06)
/ /
05/30/85
08/07/85
03/14/86
07/30/87
05/30/85
02/28/83
01/31/95
02/26/85
04/27/86
01/26/95
11/17/87
06/28/81
12/03/87
02/03/88
11/13/87
07/30/84
XREF
-------
PM! Ml! IMII
*H II! IM!|
••it mil M ii.
:•-
ii II1! I ! I :!l!l
«11"1''
t* - r r r- =- -
II I
if |
01/02/96 : ':~- :~~-'~.
! SB EH
i ^- Ji^ in* _!«'=*, *s ^" iM^ Mi s- - =
------ ----- T,;J« t i.is ~i -t,-: 1 •-.::
j :E: A:, «::;,;M'
; PART Ai-PBRMITKAPPLXCATIONi- M :;'
ill
SIB !M|||!
; s a
KEYWORD IMJEX
- • i: ,ii; ,f i .-,.- ;,,,,:- :|": ;
(See Permit) Application) !See aluo InteJriin!statUfB|Prb«e!sis) i
PART B PERMIT APPLICATION
s
(See Permit Application) (See also Interim :status=Process)
PARTIAL CLOSURE I \
PCBS
(See Closure Process) -. , ! -_ , - :
' I i
i i ; i ;| : "
'INTERIM STATUS FOR RECEIVING SQG WASTE! -
ACCEPTABLE LEVELS OF RESIDUAL CONTAMINANTS=IN THE:EPA INCINERATOR RESIDUES (REVISION)
MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTION RESIDUES-ASH AND SLUDGE
PCB-CONTAMINATED WASTES, STABILIZATION OF !
RCRA TEST METHODS 4 QA ACTIVITIES I
SOXTEC EXTRACTION SYSTEM VS. SOXHLET EXTRACTION SYSTEM FOR PREPARATION OF PCB SAMPLES•
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE CONTAMINATED WITH POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs) !
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
(See Boilers and Industrial Furnaces)
PERMIT APPLICATION
Page^Ko, 98
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
9528,
9488.
9443.
9487.
9441.
9443,
9444.
XREF
1986(06)
198'5(03)
1986(13}
198:8(01)
198:8(31)
198:8(06)
198:9(10)
/ /
II
/ /
/ /
07/30/86
04/01/85
05/27/86
02/03/88
07/30/88
05/31/88
09/22/89
/ /
i |;j
i i B <
Hirr
'INTERIM STATUS AND SQG
'PART B APPLICATION
'PERMIT APPLICATION AND RENEWAL
213 OF HSWA, REQUIREMENTS - PERMIT ISSUANCE AND CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE
CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL FACILITIES AND IRP ACTIVITIES
EPA AUTHORITY TO CONSIDER PERMIT APPLICANT HISTORY OF COMPLIANCE WITH RCRA
INCINERATORS FOR DESTRUCTION OF NERVE AGENTS, HIGH PRIORITY PERMITTING
OPERATOR AT GOVERNMENT-OWNED CONTRACTOR-OPERATED (GOCO) FACILITIES
PERMITTING UNITS OR FACILITIES THAT HAVE LOST INTERIM STATUS
Incomplete Part B's
INADEQUATE PART B PERMIT APPLICATION \
Owner/Operator
'GENERATOR RESPONSIBILITIES: FACILITY OWNER/OPERATOR OR MOBILE RECYCLING UNIT OPERATOR
'OWNER AND OPERATOR RESPONSIBILITIES DURING OPERATING LIFE AND CLOSURE
OWNER/OPERATOR UNDER RCRA AND CERCLA, DEFINITION OF
PERMITS ISSUED TO BOTH OWNERS AND OPERATORS IF DIFFERENT PEOPLE
Part A Permit Application
•CHANGES DURING INTERIM STATUS - CORPORATE REORGANIZATION
'EXISTING PORTION OF A LAND DISPOSAL UNIT, DEFINITION (260.10)-
'INTERIM STATUS PART A APPLICATION WITHDRAWL
'MIXED RADIOACTIVE AND HAZARDOUS WASTE, DISPOSAL OF
REGENERATION UNITS - REGULATORY STATUS
t
"--
*
~f_
; i *
i 1 -r.
~- ! E
"-
' _ '- ~
: = *
1 -
• a
: ; j
1
f
r a
I ?
I 1 S
• i P
: T E
! i »
i ; »
: : XREF I
1 9521. 1986 (05a)
9522,1985(02)
9523.1994(01)
i ! 9522.1985(03)
i I 9502.1986(14)
i 9523.1991(01)
i 9501.1986(01)
- 9472.1987(01)
J 9528.1986(11)
: -: ~ 9523.1986(04)
i
1 j
s 9521.1984 (01)
i J 9453.1984(03)
! 9471.1984(04)
: " 9432.1987(12)
, i , 9522.1984(03)
l i : .in
i J lilii 9528.1985(04)
! J ;!!!i 9432.1982(01)
! 1 ii!!! 9453.1991(01)
1 ' M1'1 9431.1988(02)
j f ill:! 9489.1991(0^^
/ /
05/30/86
03/31/85
09/30/94
07/05/85
08/22/86
03/13/91
09/11/86
06/24/87
12/10/86
10/27/86
05/02/84
12/30/84
08/30/84
10/28/87
07/30/84
10/30/85
08/30/82
06/01/91
01/30/88
08/02/91
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 99
CEMENT KILN BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FUELS DURING INTERIM STATUS
CLARIFICATION OF "DEFINITION OF FACILITY" AND PART A MAPPING REQUIREMENTS
LAND OWNER SIGNATURE ON PART A
PERMITTING UNITS CREATED FOR FACILITY CLOSURE
REGULATION OF RADIOACTIVE MIXED WASTE AT DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FACILITIES
Part B Permit Application
*CONTENTS OF PART B PERMIT APPLICATION: TRAFFIC REQUIREMENTS
'EXPOSURE INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS
*PART B PERMIT APPLICATION CHECKLISTS
*RCRA PERMITS FOR MOBILE TREATMENT UNITS
*SUMPS IN THE PART B PERMIT APPLICATION
*TOPO MAP REQUIREMENTS FOR CONTAINER STORAGE FACILITIES
*TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC WASTE PART B PERMIT APPLICATION DEADLINES
CALL-IN OF STORAGE AND TREATMENT APPLICATIONS
CLARIFICATION ON THE AMOUNT, TYPE, AND FREQUENCY OF TRAINING REQUIRED FOR PERSONNEL HANDLING HAZARDOUS WASTE AT FACILITIES
COMPLYING WITH RCRA INTERIM STATUS STANDARDS WHILE DEVELOPING A PERMIT APPLICATION
CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW LANDFILL CELL AND THE OMNIBUS PROVISION
FILING PART B PERMIT APPLICATION
GWM DATA IN PART B APPLICATIONS
IMMEDIATE IMPLEMENTATION OF NEW CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS
INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS & CLEAN CLOSED WASTE PILES, CODIFICATION RULE 12/01/87
LAND TREATMENT PERMIT APPLICATIONS - REFINERY WASTE ANALYSES GUIDANCE
MISCELLANEOUS UNITS SUBPART X, IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE
PART B PERMIT APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR SQG TREATMENT FACILITIES
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, THERMEX ENERGY/RADIAN
POST-CLOSURE PERMIT PART B REQUIREMENTS
PROVISIONS IN PART B APPLICATIONS PRIOR TO EFFECTIVE DATE AND FINAL RULE
RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM
REGULATORY INTERPRETATION OF LOSS OF INTERIM STATUS PROVISIONS AS IT APPLIES TO OB/OD FACILITIES
REQUIRED SIGNATURES ON PART B PERMIT APPLICATIONS
SUMMARY OF ASSISTANCE BRANCH PERMITTING COMMENTS
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
Pre-Construction Ban
•CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR NEW FACILITIES
*GROUNDWATER MONITORING: ESTABLISHING BACKGROUND VALUES
PERMITTING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS AFFECTING COMPLIANCE WITH LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
SITE PREPARATION WORK PERFORMED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF PERMIT
Signatures
LAND OWNER SIGNATURE ON PART A
REQUIRED SIGNATURES ON PART B PERMIT APPLICATIONS
SIGNATORIES FOR DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PERMIT APPLICATIONS
Withdrawals
REPORTING WITHDRAWALS IN SPMS AS FINAL PERMIT DETERMINATIONS
9528.1987(10)
9523.1993(01)
9523.1983(03)
9476.1985(03)
9528.1987(14)
9523.1988(01)
9523.1987(03)
9523.1984 (04)
9523.1986(01)
9502.1985(05)
9523.1984(11)
9501.1990(01)
9528.1988(06)
9451.1993(02)
9528.1986(09)
9528.1986(01)
9523.1983(06)
9523.1984(07)
9502.1985(01)
9522.1988(05)
9523.1984 (02)
9489.00-2
9522.1985(06)
9521.1987(01)
9523.50-1A
9523.1985(02)
9431.1991(03)
9528.1992(01)
9523.1985(01)
9523.00-18
9523.00-14
9523.00-12
9481.1986(10)
9481.1986(04)
9502.1986(11)
9528.1992(02)
9523.1983(03)
9523.1985(01)
9522.1985(01)
09/03/87
10/07/93
06/17/83
09/11/85
11/12/87
11/30/88
11/30/87
05/30/84
03/30/86
08/31/85
03/30/84
07/31/90
04/19/88
10/07/93
10/27/86
03/03/86
09/30/83
09/10/84
02/06/85
11/30/88
04/03/84
04/22/87
12/28/85
08/07/87
11/18/85
03/30/85
05/17/91
10/15/92
02/25/85
03/14/89
03/14/86
03/30/87
10/30/86
07/30/86
06/16/86
10/21/92
06/17/83
02/25/85
02/11/85
9521.1984(03) 07/09/84
PERMIT CONDITIONS
(See also Corrective Action, Storage, TSDFs)
* PERMIT CONDITIONS, INTERPRETING REGULATORY AUTHORITY
'PERSONNEL TRAINING DURING POST-CLOSURE
CONOCO PART B PERMITS
ENFORCEMENT OF STATE AND EPA ISSUED PERMITS
PERMIT CONDITIONS: THE VELSICOL DECISION
XREF
9524.1983(01)
9523.1985(05)
9553.1990(01)
9522.1990(01)
9524.1984(02)
12/31/83
10/30/85
05/11/90
01/26/90
10/11/84
-------
07/02/96
• i
I! ijjipjili
;; i- EMfcs :s i =
'(
KBYHORD INDEX
'MI I E 1
m "in
!M
in
!i! -fi I :«iil I
"' : Page Ha, lido"
, STAYIWS-'HSWAlPERHPf iCQNDITIOHS
Expansions "
i INTBRIMhSTATOS OFiiPROPOSBD IJWDFDUj pELLS
1 " PART B INFORMATION REGARDING FUTURE 'POTENTIAL EXPANSIONS
Operating Life I ,
FACILITY'S OPERATING LIFE, DETERMINATION OF
S v r 9S2]pMB:(;03) ; 12/09/8B
s! \m ;•!: ilia ! I i
jj :,(!:: ml i S S
Permit Requirements ,' • ; ; _- t , :
•CONTENTS OF PART B PERMIT APPLICATION: TRAFFIC REQUIREMENTS -~. a t :v.- ----- »:^ --." '.-I
•INTERIM STATUS FOR RECEIVING SQG WASTE ; '- " :"= .*":, "'" :" : ! " ." _;
•LAND TREATMENT - ;: :
ALTERNATE CONCENTRATION LIMIT (ACL) POLICY FOR HSWA PROVISIONS8 ~ ^f. = -,;£ : = -: ,^v • ; 5 f:
APPENDIX VIII CONSTITUENTS IN GROUNDWATER, REQUIREMENTS FOR ANALYSIS OF ?M '':' = >-i ; " ' -
APPLICABILITY OF 40CFR 270.1 (c) (3) TO IMMEDIATE RESPONSE ACTIVITIES RELATING TO'REMOVALJ TRANSPORTATION, -AND/OR TREATMENT OF BOMBS
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA REGULATIONS TO A PROPOSED FUMING/GASIFICATION UNIT : : :
CLARIFICATION OF "DEFINITION OF FACILITY" AND PART A MAPPING REQUIREMENTS j b ,
CLARIFICATION OF CERTAIN FINANCIAL ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO PERMITTED HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES UNDER RCRA
COMPACTING HAZARDOUS WASTE INSIDE STEEL DRUMS AS TREATMENT !
CONTAINERS STORING HAZARDOUS WASTE, REQUIREMENTS !
CORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES, NATIONAL PRIORITIES
DELAY OF CLOSURE RULE PREAMBLE LANGUAGE, CORRECTION " \
EXPLOSIVES PRESENTING AN IMMEDIATE SAFETY THREAT AND EXPLOSIVES STORED DURING ANALYSIS '• -
GENERATOR ACCUMULATION TIME REQUIREMENTS
HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT/STORAGE TANKS, PERMITTING ! '.
INTERPRETATION OF THE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS OF 40 CFR 270.30(1) (10)
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR ZERO WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO ON-SITE TREATMENT AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT EXEMPTIONS
PERMITS FOR PLACEMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN UNDERGROUND SALT MINES ' ,
PERMITTING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS AFFECTING COMPLIANCE WITH LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
! POST-CLOSURE PERMIT PART B REQUIREMENTS
RCRA FACILITY ASSESSMENTS, IMPLEMENTATION
RECYCLING ACTIVITIES
REGION V FUEL-BLENDING FACILITIES CONCERNS :
; REGULATION OF FUEL BLENDING AND RELATED TREATMENT AND STORAGE ACTIVITIES ' •
REGULATORY INTERPRETATIONS UNDER RCRA CONCERNING CERTAIN FUEL BLENDING SCENARIOS
! REPORTING REQUIREMENTS SECTION 270.30(1)(10) i
USE OF MULTIPLE TRANSFER FACILITIES AS PART OF THE "NORMAL COURSE OF TRANSPORTATION" : ;
VOLUNTARY CORRECTIVE ACTION - =
. , „-- - - - - V- - t
Permit Standards I ;
•PERMIT MODIFICATION ;
•SQG 100-1000 Kg/MONTH GENERATORS, AND THE MANIFEST \ ;
•THE OMNIBUS PROVISION AND PERMITS
•TREATMENT CAPACITY
ELIGIBILITY OF IN-SITU VITRIFICATION TECHNOLOGY TO RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND DEMONSTRATION PERMITTING !
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR DISPOSAL IN SALT DOMES
REGION X's RECOMMENDED REVISION OF 40 CFR 270.4 (a) AND 270.32(b) (1)
REGULATION OF FUEL BLENDING AND RELATED TREATMENT AND STORAGE ACTIVITIES
PERMIT DENIAL
i giSWtoailiiOi), i
* 9523W9U4!f08) i
9477,1984(07) <
9523.1988(01) i
9528^1986(06)
9486.1987(01) -
= 9481_.1987(07) 1
9481.1985(01) ;
• Z 9S22V1993 (02) !
9431.1994(02)
K 9523.1993(01) ,
v 9477.1994 (05)
r" 9503.1991(01) ;
fi 9482.1986(01)
i 9502.1986(04)
i; 9476.1989(02) '•
" 9527.1988(03)
£ 9453.1989(05) !
-~ 9483.1984(01)
" 9524.1994(01) :
9471.1989(01)
„ 9522.1988(04)
3 9472.1986(04) 1
i; 9502.1986(11)
M9523.50-1A
» 9502. 00-4 \
n 9451.1989(01) '•
:: 9441.1991(17) :
8 9521_.1994 (01) I
i 9498.1994(12) '
\ 9524.1988(01)
?• 9461.1994(01) i
^9502.1987(11) •.
~f' '
^9525.1985(01) :
^9475.1985(02) ;
^9520.1986(01) '
^9525.1986(07)
'^ 9503.1993(01)
s- 9489;.a.991(05)
, 9522:.il987(01)
™ 9521:.1994(01)
03/12/81 •_
09/10/814 '
i i
12/03/84 .
11/30/8:8 ,
07/30/86 i
07/30/87
07/24/87 :
10/15/85
04/26/93 '
11/15/94
10/07/93
08/19/94
05/21/91 '
01/21/86
02/13/86 ,
08/22/89 )
08/11/88 \
04/21/89 -
02/23/84 ",
07/19/94
03/20/89
11/02/88 .
06/04/86 s
06/16/86 ,
11/18/85 :
08/21/86 :
05/03/89 :
11/04/91 i
10/17/94 1
11/08/94 !
02/23/88 ;
06/21/94 «
12/21/87 [
10/30/85 ;
10/30/85 •
02/28/86
12/30/86
12/02/93 ;
02/22/91 '-
11/16/87
10/17/94 -
(See Permit Process)
XREF, i
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 101
PERMIT MODIFICATION
(See Permit Process)
PERMIT PROCESS
*CORRECTIVE ACTION BEYOND FACILITY BOUNDARY - FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REQUIREMENT
*CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR UIC WELLS
'CORRECTIVE ACTION IN PERMITS
*POST-CLOSURE PERMITS FOR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT
'RETROFITTING FOR PERMITTED SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
•TERMINATION OF PERMITS
*TREATABILITY STUDIES ON HAZARDOUS WASTE SAMPLES, PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
3008 (h) OF THE SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL ACT, INTERPRETATION OF
ACLs UNDER THE RCRA AND CERCLA PROGRAMS, USE OF
AWARD OF PERMITS FOR NEW HAZARDOUS WASTE LAND DISPOSAL FACILITIES, PROCESS
BYPRODUCT MATERIAL, DEFINITION OF
CARBON REGENERATION FACILITIES
CONTAINERS FOR SAFE AND ECONOMICAL STORAGE, TRANSPORT, AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE, DEVELOPMENT OF
CONTAMINATED GROUND WATER AND VOLATILES FROM AIR STRIPPING, TREATMENT OF
CORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES
CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL FACILITIES AND IRP ACTIVITIES
DENIAL OF RCRA OPERATING PERMITS
DIOXIN TRIAL BURNS FOR PURPOSES OF CERTIFICATION OR A RCRA PERMIT
DOD'S IRP PROGRAM AND RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION
EFFECTS OF THE SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR RULE ON VARIOUS GENERATOR WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
EPA AUTHORITY TO CONSIDER PERMIT APPLICANT HISTORY OF COMPLIANCE WITH RCRA
FACILITY TRANSFER/RECONSTRUCTION DURING INTERIM STATUS
FEDERAL FACILITIES INVENTORY UNDER RCRA 3016
FOUNDRY SANDS RECYCLED AND RETURNED TO THE FOUNDRY
GROUNDWATER CLEANUP STANDARDS/ACLs IN DRAFT HSWA PERMIT (INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY)
HSWA APPLIED TO FEDERAL FACILITIES (DOE-OAK RIDGE)
INCINERATOR PERMITS TO BURN DIOXIN WASTES, MODIFICATION OF
INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM (IRP) - DOD
INTERIM STATUS REQUIREMENTS FOR NRC LICENSEES MANAGING RADIOACTIVE MIXED WASTE, CLARIFICATION
LAND DISPOSAL UNIT CLOSURE CLARIFICATION OF PROPOSED AND PROMULGATED RULES
NEGOTIATED PERMITS
OMNIBUS AUTHORITY TO CONTROL EMISSIONS OF METALS, HCL & PICs FROM INCINERATORS
PERFORMANCE AND PERMITTING STANDARDS IN 3004 (b) , PROHIBITION OF PLACEMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN SALT DOMES
PERMIT APPLICATIONS FOR DESTRUCTION OF NERVE AGENTS
PERMIT COMPLIANCE/ENFORCEMENT ISSUES (REG. X)
PERMITTING INCINERATORS
PERMITTING ISSUES (DUPONT EDGEMORE FACILITY) - GUIDANCE
PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS FOR A PCB INCINERATOR
POST-CLOSURE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS (ARMCO STEEL)
PUBLIC HEARING AFTER ISSUANCE OF DRAFT PERMIT - STATES
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT IN PERMITTING, POLICY FOR EXPANDING
RD&D PERMITS - POLICY GUIDANCE
RECYCLED GASOLINE/WATER AND FUEL OIL/WATER MIXTURES
RELEASES OF HAZARDOUS WASTE, RCRA APPLICABILITY TO
SECURITY REQUIREMENTS AT FACILITIES
STORAGE PERMIT FOR FACILITIES INVOLVED IN HAZARDOUS WASTE RECYCLING
SUMMARY OF ASSISTANCE BRANCH PERMITTING COMMENTS
SUMMARY OF ASSISTANCE BRANCH PERMITTING COMMENTS
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
XREF
XREF
9502.1986(10)
9527.1986(02)
9521.1986(06a)
9522.1986(02a)
9484.1987(09)
9525.1986(05)
9441.1986(58)
9502.1985(09)
9481.1986(06)
9521.1986(03)
9432.1986(10)
9442.1986(03)
9482.1985(01)
9441. '1986 (86)
9502.00-2
9502.1986(14)
9523.00-11
9488.00-1A
9502.1986(17)
9451.1986(01)
9523.1991(01)
9477.1986(01)
9502.1987(03)
9441.1987(13)
9481.1987(02)
9502.1985(06)
9488.1985(04)
9502.1986(20)
9528.1989(13)
9476.1985(05)
9505.1987(01)
9524.1989(01)
9489.1985(01)
9488.1986(10)
9522.00-3
9488.00-2
9525.1988(02)
9488.1986(04)
9522.1986(03)
9521.1984(02)
9521.1986(04)
9503.50-1A
9441.1986(22)
9502.1987(05)
9472.1988(01)
9441.1989(11)
9523.00-18
9523.00-17
9523.00-14
9523.00-15
/ /
05/30/86
04/30/86
06/30/86
10/30/86
07/30/87
10/31/86
06/30/86
12/16/85
08/06/86
04/08/86
04/12/86
04/02/86
11/26/85
11/20/86
04/18/86
08/22/86
12/10/86
05/07/86
09/29/86
03/17/86
03/13/91
01/03/86
03/06/87
03/04/87
03/10/87
10/29/85
05/30/85
12/08/86
10/15/89
12/13/85
08/13/87
02/27/89
09/20/85
09/11/86
11/13/87
06/10/86
07/01/88
04/11/86
11/20/86
05/07/84
04/30/86
12/23/85
03/19/86
04/02/87
06/02/88
03/27/89
03/14/89
09/02/88
03/14/86
03/30/88
-------
07/02/96
i! F
-k II
,i (
-1 :
^ -s-
i, L
"i
!!l
I'Htr- ifnf^fix rt
'
V •* ;-*vX »^ -'P^a, , •
-"->-'--v>!! -
ijiM
*,: »M * if; ! »'
l^rii to:, ts Gi i==lr^?> ; =
u-=-p i t*iti=;ih=^j,^^^
" ;;t: ; , :-i;^
I! iii MM '!
ji p1 iii is
J, ,;i ft- »
;i -t :t - :t
-- . al __^ ; ^ -^
= E -==:-==
li 5 !1 ::! !BM ,! SH
IM Ml
Pi I
II
! I!
^ =- = =—--= -=-=== _^=1^= _
iF
[YHORD- XK0BX
tj
i !-::r ! I :l!!;»sJ j :,, b, ^
1 MSORFACEtlHPOWDWEHT CWSte.^PffiC/toCrtryiiOFiiSooaftllsOF RCRA1 TO ! ^
SURFACE!! IMPOUNDMENT RETROFITTING AND TIME ALLOWED FORECLOSURE
; ;THBRMAL!j RELIEF VENTS ON HAZARDOUS HASTE INCINERATORS, ACCEPTABILITY OF ;
iii! (TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN A GENERATOR'S ACCUMULATION TANKS AND CONTAINERS!
UIC CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS, IMPLEMENTATION
Appeals 5
ECOLOTEC PERMIT REMAND ORDER AND USE OF THE OMNIBUS PROVISION
POSTPONEMENT OF A LAND TREATMENT DEMONSTRATION FOR NAVAJO REFINING CO., ARTESIA,
RECONSIDERATION OF DELISTING DENIAL BASED ON USE OF VHS, TOTAL CHROMIUM STANDARD
MM
AND MCL
Deadlines
*PART B APPLICATION
CALL-IN OF STORAGE AND TREATMENT APPLICATIONS
EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR PART A SUBMITTAL AND INTERIM STATUS APPLICABILITY FOR CEMENT KILNS
INCINERATORS FOR DESTRUCTION OF NERVE AGENTS, HIGH PRIORITY PERMITTING
LAND DISPOSAL FACILITIES NOT ON A PERMITTING OR CLOSURE SCHEDULE
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS EFFECT ON PERMITS
MISCELLANEOUS UNITS SUBPART X, IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE
PROPOSED RULES IMPACT ON PERMIT DEADLINES
WASTE PILES AND POST-CLOSURE PERMITS, APPLICATION OF NOVEMBER 1988 DEADLINE TO
Delegation of Authority
ENFORCEMENT OF STATE AND EPA ISSUED PERMITS
NEWLY IDENTIFIED WASTE STREAMS AS A RESULT OF NEW TC
PERMITTING ISSUES (DUPONT EDGEMORE FACILITY) - GUIDANCE :
SPLITTING FEDERAL RCRA PERMITS WITH THE STATE AUTHORIZATION
STATE PERMITS ISSUED BEFORE RECEIVING RCRA PHASE II AUTHORIZATION
Joint Permitting • "
GUIDANCE ON HOW TO COORDINATE PERMIT 3004 (U) AND ORDER 3008 (H) REQUIREMENTS FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION
PIG-82-5 AND RSI 05 JOINT PERMITTING IN PHASE I AUTHORIZED STATES
RCRA PERMIT REAOTHORIZATION ISSUES IN REGION HI
RCRA PERMITS WITH HSWA CONDITIONS - JOINTLY ISSUED PERMITS
WASTE MINIMIZATION: PERMIT CERTIFICATION AND JOINT PERMITTING-
WASTES NEWLY REGULATED UNDER HSWA, MANAGEMENT OF
On-Site Waste Management
ON-SITE INCINERATION OF A WASTE THAT IS BOTH A BY-PRODUCT MATERIAL AND HAZARDOUS
ON-SITE TREATMENT BY GENERATORS UNDER 262.34
PERMIT ISSUES REGARDING ON-SITE TREATMENT BY FLUIDIZED BED INCINERATION
TEMPORARY EXCLUSION APPLIED TO ONLY ONE FACILITY (MONROE AUTO)
TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN GENERATOR'S ACCUMULATION TANKS
Permit Denial
•APPEAL/RECOURSE PROCESS FOR PERMIT DENIAL
DENIAL OF RCRA OPERATING PERMITS
Permit Modification
*ADDITION OF A SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT TO AN EXISTING INTERIM STATUS FACILITY
•CHANGES AT INTERIM STATUS TANK FACILITIES
•CONSTRUCTION DURING INTERIM STATUS WHERE ORIGINAL UNITS ARE CLOSED
•CORRECTIVE ACTION AND PERMITS
•CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS WHILE SEEKING A MAJOR PERMIT MODIFICATION
•INTERIM STATUS VS. PERMIT MODIFICATION FOR NEWLY REGULATED UNITS
•OBTAINING INTERIM STATUS
IT MODIFICATION
I Page ;Nov
9476.1987 (01) *
9484.00-5a
9488,00-3 i
9453.1986(08) !
9502,00-3
i !
9524.1989(02) '
9524 .,1989 (03) ."
9433.1986(08)
9522.:1985(02) :
9528.1988(06) :
9528.1987(12) !
9501.1986(01) ,
9501.1987(01)
9522.00-1
9489.00-2
9501.1987(03)
9501.1985(01)
9522.1990(01) \
9528.1990(03) --
9525.1988(02) i
9521.1990(01) '
9542.1982(03) :
*
9502.1989(04) i
9543.00-1 t
9541.1985(01) •
9502.1987(06) :
9560.1985(01) I
9541.1985(05) /
£
9432.1986(14) !
.9453.1987(03) L
9522.1985(05) 1
9441.1987(30) ',
9453.1987(02) 1
i
9521. 1986 (04a)S
9523.00-11 i
9528.1985(01) ,
9528.1987(09)
9528.1987(03) I
9525.1988(01) I
9502.1986(03) i
-9525.1989(01)
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 103
*PUBLIC COMMENT PERIODS FOR PERMIT MODIFICATIONS
*STOCK TRANSFER - EFFECT ON PART A PERMIT APPLICATION
TERMINATION OF PERMITS
—ABLE TO PERMUTED HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES UNDER RCRA
CLARIFICATION OF THE TEMPORARY AUTHORIZATION PROVISION OF 40 CFR 270.42 (e)
nRsEcsT™™^^ «™«« «* ™r A CflHU?
MULTI-SOURCE LEACHATE AND TREATMENT STANDARDS OF LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
NEW WASTE STREAMS AT INTERIM STATUS FACILITIES
NEWLY IDENTIFIED WASTE STREAMS AS A RESULT OF NEW TC
NEWLY REGULATED UNITS AT PERMITTED FACILITIES
PERMIT PROCESS ISSUES
PERMITTING UNITS OR FACILITIES THAT HAVE LOST INTERIM STATUS
SCINTILLATION VIALS CONTAINING D001 WASTES, MANAGEMENT OF
SOLVENT MIXTURES, FINAL RULE TO LIST - PERMIT MODIFICATIONS
SPLITTING FEDERAL RCRA PERMITS WITH THE STATE AUTHORIZATION
TREATMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES AT HAZARDOUS WASTE PERMITTED TSDF
Permitting
* PERMIT APPLICATION AND RENEWAL
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
(See Permit Conditions)
PERMIT STANDARDS
(See Permit Conditions)
PERMITTING
(See Closure Process, Permit Process)
PERSONNEL TRAINING
*PERSONNEL TRAINING DURING POST-CLOSURE
PESTICIDES
(See Agricultural Waste) (See also Hazardous Waste Identification)
PETITIONS
(See also Exclusions, Delisting, Land Disposal Restrictions)
*APPEALING DENIAL OF PETITION TO DELIST A HAZARDOUS WASTE
*DELISTING OF K051 WASTE AT PETROLEUM REFINERY - EFFECT ON INTERIM STATUS
'DELISTING PETITIONS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTES FROM THE PETROLEUM INDUSTRY
ALTERNATIVE METALS ANALYSIS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE COMBUSTORS
TO DETERMINE WASTE VOLUME FOR VHS ANALYSIS
DELISTING ISSUES RELATING TO EPA'S MOBILE INCINERATOR
DELISTING PETITION - FUJI PHOTO FILM WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE
DELISTING PETITION FOR INCINERATOR ASH
DELISTING PETITION OF NITROGEN TETROXIDE RINSATE
DELISTING PETITIONS, PROCEDURES FOR PROCESSING
9525.1990(01)
9525.1984(01)
9525.1986(06)
9525.1986(02)
9477.1994(05)
9527.1993(01)
9528.1987(15)
9502.1995(01)
9554.1990(08)
9528.1990(01)
9528.1990(03)
9528.1986(04)
9521.1986(02)
9528.1986(08)
9525.1986(04)
9525.1986(01)
9521.1990(01)
9525.1990(02)
08/30/90
08/30/84
11/30/86
03/27/86
08/19/94
02/09/93
11/25/87
02/17/95
07/31/90
04/02/90
07/11/90
01/30/86
03/24/86
11/20/86
08/11/86
03/24/86
05/23/90
10/17/90
9523.1994(01) 09/30/94
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
9523.1985(05)
XREF
/ /
10/30/85
XREF
9433
9433
9433
9498
9523
9433
9433
9433
9433
9433
9433
.1987(04)
.1986(12)
.1994(03)
.1994(09)
.1986(05)
.1987(07)
.1986(20)
.1991(01)
.1991(03)
.1990(07)
.1987(15)
02/28/87
04/30/86
11/30/94
08/17/94
11/21/86
04/13/87
12/11/86
03/07/91
07/10/91
12/21/90
07/28/8?
-------
ill!!!
!!! III!!! ! ll|!g """"
i
f -;'-- B-i Id:
B , :pp =: p
i lili'I
07/02/96
I '! !
, !««!!• «!•
sL=Safs •
!j
ij i j ii i
I! •
i -Ts-f =il = P
I • HI II- 31II
: ,i Rjt J ; J'1;
i: - f
i M =i-*«:i!= l« Ji i
11
Ii;
_ — -. . .- ,,, ,-^p,,ai,ai, i, II • (: « £1 ah, J! j
DELISTIWjPOUa^iALtOHsillEXCUISlON dP SEPARATE HASTE! TREATMENT^ UNITS ATlMULTI-WIT FACILITIES
DELlSTING.j INTERIM STATUS, AND SAMPLING ISSUES AT ULS. NAMEPLATE COMPANY
DENIAL OF IDELIST1JHO PETITION BASED OH EXISTING GROUWDWATER CONTAMINATION '-
. . j-ELECTROPLATING SLUDGE, EXCLUSION PETITION : H
EVALUATION OF DELISTING PETITIONS-INFORMATION REQUIRED
: | - EXTENSION OF APPLICABLE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS : !|« !I '•'
- i ' = GROUNDHATER CONTAMINATION AS A BASIS TO DENY A DELISTING PETITION "" ''*"
INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS & CLEAN CLOSED WASTE PILES, CODIFICATION RULE 12/01/87 '' '*
«B^,/K134 HASTB STREAMS - RELATIONSHIP OF CWA BAT, LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS, BDAT, AND DELISTING
METAL, K061 WASTES IN SURFACE IMPOUNDHENT-DELISTING PETITION
^NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR AMOCO REFINERY '
= NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR ARCO PRODUCTS, HA "
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR ATLANTIC REFINING & MARKETING, PA •
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR CONOCO, MT i
- NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR EXXON, TX
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR KERR-MCGEE REFINING, OK i
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR KOCH REFINING, TX
; NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR KOCH'S REFINING, TX
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR MARATHON PETROLEUM, IL •
iNO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR ROBINSON, IL
-NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR SHELL OIL, WA
I NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR SINCLAIR OIL, OK :
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR STAR ENTERPRISE, DE -
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR SUN REFINING, OK
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR TEXACO, WA
_PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR DISPOSAL IN SALT DOMES :
-PETITION TO WITHDRAW K090 AND K091 LISTINGS
REINTERPRETATION NARROWING THE SCOPE OF THE F006 LISTING
I ; -SAMPLING LOCATION IN A SEPARATOR - THICKENER TREATMENT TRAIN AND THE MIXTURE RULE '
i ; -SAMPLING PLAN FOR DELISTING PETITION FOR WASTES IN LANDFILL TRENCHES '
SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS FOR ESTIMATING VARIABILITY OF WASTES FOR DELISTING PETITIONS
: SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR DELISTING PETITION !i
: , TEMPORARY AND INFORMAL DELISTINGS AND HSWA EFFECTS ON BOTH '
' WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES CONTAINING METHANOL
PETROLEUM REFINERY WASTES
(See also Exclusions, Delisting)
*40 CFR SECTION 261.4 (c) : HAZARDOUS WASTES WHICH ARE EXEMPTED FROM CERTAIN REGULATIONS
*BURNING/BLENDING OF UNUSED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT (XYLENE) WITH USED OIL
*DELISTING PETITIONS FOR HAZARDOUS HASTES FROM THE PETROLEUM INDUSTRY
*K052 BOTTOMS FROM TANK STORING LEADED GASOLINE AT PETROLEUM REFINERIES
*OFF-SPECIFICATION USED OIL FUEL
*PETROLEUM REFINERY WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE CLASSIFICATION
*RECYCLED USED OIL - TECHNICAL CRITERIA FOR LISTING, COURT DECISION
*USED OIL AS DUST SUPPRESSANT
*USED OIL, DEFINITION OF
ARE TANK BOTTOMS REMOVED FROM TANKS CONTAINING ONLY NAPHTHA DEEMED TO BE K052 HAZARDOUS WASTE?
ATOMIZER MULTI-OIL FUELED HEATERS, INSPECTION AND CERTIFICATION CRITERIA FOR
AUTOMOTIVE FLUIDS, REGULATION OF
BOILERS USED IN GREENHOUSE OPERATIONS ARE INDUSTRIAL BOILERS
BURNING CHARACTERISTIC OFF-SPECIFICATION PETROLEUM PRODUCTS FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
DECISION NOT TO REQUIRE NOTIFICATION FROM GENERATORS WHO BURN SPECIFICATION USED OIL ON-SITE
DERIVED FROM/MIXTURE RULE APPLICATION TO REFINERY WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS
DRAINAGE WATER BENEATH LAND TREATMENT UNITS - NO MIGRATION PETITIONS
DRAINAGE WATER BENEATH LAND TREATMENT UNITS AT OIL REFINERIES
KTING PETROLEUM WASTE TO SOUTH AMERICA
I ! iiii
i i Mii
CRITERIA
J lil
:l
i 1 | Ptfge
-
-
- 9433 .1987 (22)
9433.19)97(03)
=3433.1987(05)
=9433.1984(05)
,9433,1986(04)
19551.1988(09)
9433.1987(08)
9522.1988(05)
9433.1987(06)
=9433.1987(18)
9551.1990(13)
9551.1990(08)
19551.1991(06)
9551.1991(09)
19551.1991(03)
•9551.1991(05)
-9551.1991(12)
9551.1991(01)
•9551.1990(09)
9551.1991(14)
9551.1990(11)
9551.1990(12)
19551.1990(10)
9551.1991(02)
,9551.1991(08)
19489.1991(05)
:9444.1989(11)
;9444.1986(21)
[9433.1986(11)
,9433.1986(21)
,9433.1986(22)
•9433.1991(02)
19433.1986(14)
19441.1989(52)
1
1
\
XREF
9441.1990(133)
.9442.1985(01)
9433.1994(03)
9442.1994(02)
9454.1986(02)
9444.1991(01)
9433.1988(02)
9493.1985(06)
9431.1988(01)
9442.1995(04)
9495.1988(02)
9441.1987(14)
9432.1986(03)
9441.1986(95)
9495.1987(05)
9441.1987(70)
9551.1988(15)
9486.1988(1^^
9455 . 1989 ^^H
i j
, ;
10/02/87
02/25/87
03/19/87
12/11/84
02/14/86
08/11/88
04/24/87
11/30/88
04/02/87
08/07/87
11/08/90
10/24/90
04/22/91
05/29/91
01/29/91
02/05/91
12/10/91
01/03/91
11/06/90
05/01/91
11/07/90
11/08/90
11/07/90
01/17/91
05/29/91
02/22/91
10/03/89
10/04/86
04/24/86
12/13/86
12/18/86
04/26/91
05/27/86
10/06/89
/ /
05/31/90
- 12/30/85
11/30/94
02/28/94
02/28/86
02/01/91
11/30/88
12/30/85
01/30/88
05/25/95
09/22/88
03/06/87
01/09/86
12/23/86
03/26/87
08/28/87
01/21/88
01/02/88
i 06/27/89
t
-r
If
if
p»
11
H»
r «
ii
II
; j
if
ta
k PS
ii
il
"i_
ii
! B
f
,•;,
': Ji
:T
L j
;(
_ i"
i.f
- fe
i J
L a
J fc
i^
if
3S
?¥
'i:1
||
i B
- S
\i
ij
il
a PP
]j
"1
(J
1|
IS
•
=
-
1
1
=
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 105
HSWA PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF HAZARDOUS WASTE AS A DUST SUPPRESSANT
LAND TREATMENT PERMIT APPLICATIONS - REFINERY WASTE ANALYSES GUIDANCE
MIXED WASTE REGULATION - RCRA REQUIREMENTS VS. NRC REQUIREMENTS
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR AMOCO REFINERY
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR EXXON, TX
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR KOCH'S REFINING, TX
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR MARATHON PETROLEUM, IL
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR ROBINSON, IL
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR SHELL OIL, WA
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR SUN REFINING, OK
OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION EXCLUSION
OIL/WATER EMULSIONS GENERATED BY PETROLEUM REFINERY WW SYSTEMS-K049 WASTE
PETROLEUM FACILITIES INCLUDED IN THE K051 LISTING FOR API SEPARATOR SLUDGE
PETROLEUM REFINERY SLUDGE REGULATIONS
PETROLEUM REFINERY WW, MIXTURE AND DERIVED-FROM RULES
PETROLEUM REFINING WASTES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR WWTUs
REFINERY WASTEWATER
REGULATION OF OILY HAZARDOUS PETROLEUM REFINERY WASTE
REGULATORY STATUS OF A GASIFICATION UNIT PROPOSED BY TEXACO TO BE BUILT IN EL DORADO, KANSAS
SECONDARY SLUDGES FROM BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF REFINERY WASTEWATERS
SHELL OIL FACILITY - TC COMPLIANCE
UNDERGROUND INJECTION WELLS USED IN HYDROCARBON RECOVERY
USED OIL BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY, INTERPRETATION OF SUBPART E
USED OIL CONTAMINATION THROUGH NORMAL USE OR MIXING WITH HAZARDOUS WASTES - RECYCLING DEFINED
USED OIL INTRODUCED INTO REFINERY PROCESS UNDER HAZARDOUS WASTE DERIVED REFINERY FUEL PRODUCTS EXEMPTION
WASTE-AS-FUEL RULES AT DOD FACILITIES, IMPLEMENTATION
Recovered Oil
CLARIFICATION AND/OR RECONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN EPA'S FINAL RULE ON RECOVERED OIL
Used Oil
CLARIFICATION AND/OR RECONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN EPA'S FINAL RULE ON RECOVERED OIL
REGULATORY STATUS OF SEPARATION AND RECOVERY SYSTEMS SAREX PROCESS FOR RECYCLING PETROLEUM REFINERY OILY WASTES
TRANSPORTATION OF USED OIL TO LOCATIONS WHERE USED OIL CAN BE MIXED WITH CRUDE OIL
PHOSPHATE WASTES
(See Hazardous Waste Identification)
PICKLE LIQUOR
(See Electroplating)
POHCs
(See Incineration)
POST-CLOSURE
(See also Closure Process, Cost Estimates, Financial Responsibility, Groundwater Monitoring)
•ADJUSTMENT OF POST-CLOSURE TRUST FUNDS USED FOR FINANCIAL ASSURANCE
*CLEAN CLOSURE OF INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT AND WASTE PILE
•CORRECTIVE ACTION IN PERMITS
•FINANCIAL ASSURANCE COST ADJUSTMENTS ON A QUARTERLY BASIS
•GNP V. GDP FOR COST ADJUSTMENTS UNDER RCRA
•GROUNDWATER MONITORING - ASSESSMENT MONITORING/CORRECTIVE ACTION AT CLOSED INTERIM STATUS FACILITIES
•GROUNDWATER MONITORING - COMPLIANCE PERIOD/POST-CLOSURE CARE PERIOD
9493.00-1A
9523.1984 (02)
9451.1989(02)
9551.1990(13)
9551.1991(03)
9551.1991(01)
9551.1990(09)
9551.1991(14)
9551.1990(11)
9551.1991(02)
9441.1987(04)
9441.1984(35)
9444.1987(20)
9444.1990(05)
9441.1985(29)
9483.1990(03)
9444.1980(02)
9493.1991(01)
9441.1995(18)
9441.1985(08)
9431.1991(02)
9521.1991(02)
9495.1989(01)
9441.1984(30)
9441.1986(11)
9494.1986(02)
9441.1995(17)
9441.1995(17)
9432.1993(01)
9592.1994(04)
05/31/86
04/03/84
06/26/89
11/08/90
01/29/91
01/03/91
11/06/90
05/01/91
11/07/90
01/17/91
01/13/87
12/07/84
05/26/87
10/17/90
08/23/85
09/20/90
11/13/80
01/08/91
05/25/95
02/22/85
05/09/91
08/30/91
05/15/89
10/22/84
02/11/86
03/19/86
05/03/95
05/03/95
03/05/93
06/09/94
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
9477
9522
9521
9477
9477
9481
9481
.1988(05)
.1988(01)
.1986 (06a)
.1994(02)
.1994(03)
.1988(02)
.1988(03)
11/30/88
02/28/88
06/30/86
06/30/94
06/30/94
04/30/88
04/30/88
-------
ill
I I
1
i
1
j
s
•
1
•
1
1
j
1
I
•
•
I
1
•
•
1
1
1
1
1
•
•
1
m
^'
I
•
!
i
j
j
i
I
i
i
•
3
|
m
i
•
|
•
-
|
=
=
?
i
=
|
|
1
;
a
f-
;
^
^
i
=
=
•
=
1
Z
- ~ - -
0-7/02/96 _ _ m __ _ KEYMORO IKDEX
•INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT FOR TANKS AND POST- CLOSURE =
*POST-CLOSURE PERMITS FOR! SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT
*jPOST-CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS FOR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS LOCATED IN A 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIR -
3:008 (h)i ORDERS OR POST-CLOSURE PERMITS AT CLOSING FACILITIES, USE OF
CLOSURE 6 POST-CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS REGARDING HAZARDOUS HASTE TREATMENT, STORAGE AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES
CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE REGULATIONS/ PARTIAL CLOSURE (EMELLE.AL)
CORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES
CORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES, NATIONAL PRIORITIES
: CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL FACILITIES AND IRP ACTIVITIES
DENIAL OF RCRA OPERATING PERMITS
INCINERATORS FOR DESTRUCTION OF NERVE AGENTS, HIGH PRIORITY PERMITTING
INSTALLATION RESTORATION PROGRAM (IRP) - DOD ;
INTERPRETATION OF RCRA REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO THE REMEDIATION OF CONTAMINATION .
PERMITTING UNITS CREATED FOR FACILITY CLOSURE !
; POST-CLOSURE PERMIT PART B REQUIREMENTS i
POST-CLOSURE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS (ARMCO STEEL)
POST-CLOSURE PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS FOR NON-REGULATED UNITS
i POST-CLOSURE PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS FOR NON-REGULATED UNITS i
RCRA POST-CLOSURE PERMITS FOR REGULATED UNITS AT NPL SITES :
RCRA PROGRAM DIRECTIONS - PRIORITY TO ENVIRONMENTALLY SIGNIFICANT FACILITIES 1
: REGULATORY INTERPRETATION OF OBJECTION TO CLEAN-CLOSURE EQUIVALENCY PETITION FOR STEEL ABRASIVES, INC.
; RELEASES OF HAZARDOUS WASTE, RCRA APPLICABILITY TO
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT CLOSURE, APPLICABILITY OF 3005 (i) OF RCRA TO ;
: POTW
(See Wastewater)
PRE-CONSTRUCTION BAN I
(See Permit Application) ;
PRE-HSWA PROVISIONS '' =
(See State Authorization) _• = -
PRECIOUS METALS
I
(See Recycle) ;
PRIMARY TREATMENT ! ~~
i
(See Treatment)
; PROCEDURE
.:
(See Test Methods) !
PROCESS WASTES i
! (See Hazardous Waste Identification) ' '
PROCESSOR REQUIREMENTS : •;
: - i —
; (See Used Oil) i ~ i
* ..;, _ „
9483
9522
9484
9S02
9476
9476
9502
9502
9502
9523
9501
9502
9502
9476
9523
9522
9521
9476
9476
9501
9476
9502
9476
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
P
.1989(04)
. inar, (O2a)
.1984(02)
.00-7
.1983(02)
.1986(01)
.1986(06)
.1986(04)
.1906(14)
.00-11
.1986(01)
.1986(20)
.1989(03)
.1985(03)
.50-1A
.1986(03)
.1985(01)
.1985(04)
.1992(01)
.1987(02)
.1990(01)
.1987(05)
.1987(01)
I 1 i i
1 i i !
s-
agfti No. 10« i |
J 1 !
10^30/89 ' !
10/30/86
12/31/84
03/08/88
01/11/83
OS/08/86
04/15/86
02/13/86
08/22/86 .
12/10/86 , .' ,
09/11/86 i I '
12/08/86 ! !
06/15/89 ! i
09/11/85 ; ;
11/18/85 ! i
11/20/86 ; '
09/25/85 i
09/25/85
07/02/92 ;
12/14/87 ! :
06/04/90 : !
04/02/87 : ;
06/09/87 1
: : -
/ / ; i
: : !
/ / i ;.
i ;
/ / ! i
/ / •- -•
i ;r
II \\, .
i
/ / : ; i
/ , M
i il "
/ / II-
1 ! i -
||
||
i j
M
1 1
II
i i
i j
i-
i 1
l|
||
|l
i
s \
|
M
II
I
II
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 107
PROTECTIVE FILERS
(See Interim Status Process)
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
(See also Closure Process, Post-Closure)
•CLOSURE PLAN PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD FOR INTERIM STATUS FACILITIES
*PUBLIC COMMENT PERIODS FOR PERMIT MODIFICATIONS
FIELD ASSESSMENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PLAN FOR THE OCCIDENTAL INCINERATOR
INCINERATORS FOR DESTRUCTION OF NERVE AGENTS, HIGH PRIORITY PERMITTING
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS FOR FY 1986
RCRA PERMITS WITH HSWA CONDITIONS - JOINTLY ISSUED PERMITS
QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL (QA/QC)
(See also SW-846)
ANALYTICAL METHODS/EP TOXICITY TEST/REFERENCE STDS.
(")("* RPVTPW OP PFRMIT DATA
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLANS AND DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES FOR RCRA GROUND-WATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION ACTIVITIES
RCRA METHODS AND QA ACTIVITIES (NOTES)
RCRA METHODS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES (NOTES)
RCRA METHODS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES (NOTES)
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
SW-846 METHODS MANUAL
RAGS AND WIPERS
(See Solvents)
RCRA
(See RCRA/CERCLA Interface)
RCRA FACILITY ASSESSMENT (RFA)
(See Corrective Action)
RCRA/CERCLA INTERFACE
ACLs UNDER THE RCRA AND CERCLA PROGRAMS, USE OF
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS TO CERCLA RESPONSE ACTIONS
APPLICABLE LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS TO REINJECTION OF TREATED CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER UNDER CERCLA AND RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
DELISTING, INTERIM STATUS, AND SAMPLING ISSUES AT U.S. NAMEPLATE COMPANY
FEDERAL FACILITIES INVENTORY UNDER RCRA 3016
FEDERAL POLICY REGARDING DIOXIN DISPOSAL
GENERATOR LIABILITY FOR DELISTED WASTE RELEASES
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS CLARIFICATIONS
PIPELINE TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
RCRA PERMIT REAUTHORIZATION ISSUES IN REGION III
REQUIREMENTS FOR CLEANUP OF FINAL NPL SITES UNDER RCRA
XREF
XREF
9476.
9525.
9505.
9501.
9505.
9502.
XREF
9445,
9442,
9445,
9445
9445
9445
9523
9445
1987(07)
1990(01)
1986(01)
1986(01)
1985(01)
1987(06)
1984(02)
1990(04)
1993(06)
1985(04)
1984(01)
1984(05)
00-12
1987(02)
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
9481.
9553.
9554.
9433.
9502.
9444,
9433,
9551,
9432
9541
9502
1986(06)
1989(02)
1989(05)
1987(03)
1987(03)
1987(26)
1985(04)
1987(01)
1986(08)
1985(01)
1990(02)
11/30/87
08/30/90
09/18/86
09/11/86
11/13/85
06/30/87
04/23/84
11/01/90
07/07/93
06/30/85
04/23/84
12/20/84
03/30/87
09/16/87
CERCLA (Superfund)
APPLICABILITY OF "SUPERFUND LDR GUIDES"
CLARIFICATION OF HOW PROVISIONS IN CERCLA APPLY TO
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (CAP), CONTENTS AND USE OF
'SERVICE STATION DEALERS" THAT HANDLE USED OIL
9551.1991(15)
9592.1994(12)
9502.1987(04)
08/06/86
11/13/89
12/20/89
02/25/87
03/06/87
07/02/87
10/23/85
01/20/87
04/30/86
03/06/85
07/11/90
01/07/91
11/10/94
03/13/87
-------
07/02/96
1 Ii1
IS
: !'i
! _1: 3i?i !:!
_-~EV_=.-
Mil H! !ll I
1 ill! Si [8
II I ;
Page No, 109
= i •*- wi ; i« ! ' : r;: I'iSi-^ilitMTCj-iT' :
HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT CAPACITY AND RCRA CONSISTENCY ISSUES .'-'.' !? ^I^giS Si !' 1»:,,;; .-
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION PROGRAMS, CERCLA AND RCRA LIABILITY OF MWilCCSttALIiSPOMSOtS.XJF I..
LIABILITY AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR TRANSPORTATION AND DISPOSAL OF SMALL QUANTITIES OF HAZARDOUS HASTE
OWNER/OPERATOR UNDER RCRA AND CERCLA, DEFINITION OF
PLACEMENT OF RCRA FACILITIES ON THE CBRCLA NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST, POLICY FOR .
I Ij !M
ii!
RCRA
INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS & CLEAN CLOSED WASTE PILES, CODIFICATION RULE 12/01/87
OWNER/OPERATOR UNDER RCRA AND CERCLA, DEFINITION OF
RECYCLING ACTIVITIES
UCAPCO APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE UNDER 3004 (c) (2) OF RCRA
UIC CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS, IMPLEMENTATION
Tax
SPENT SOLVENT RECOVERY, WASTE MANAGEMENT TAX '
Treatability Study
'TREATABILITY STUDIES SAMPLE EXEMPTION :
DESIGNATED FACILITY UNDER THE TREATABILITY STUDY EXCLUSION
NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR TREATABILITY STUDIES
RD&D PERMIT
CHEMICAL AGENT/MUNITIONS -SYSTEM (CADMS) IS NOT TOTALLY ENCLOSED AND SUGGESTED RD&D PERMIT
DESTRUCTION OF DIOXIN CONTAMINATED SOIL USING MOBILE INCINERATION :
ELIGIBILITY OF IN-SITU VITRIFICATION TECHNOLOGY TO RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND DEMONSTRATION PERMITTING
RD&D PERMIT FOR A SLUDGE DRYING PROCESS IN A WASTEWATER SYSTEM
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION FOR WET-AIR OXIDATION UNIT(VERTECH)
REACTIVE WASTES
(See Characteristic Hazardous Waste)
RECLAMATION
(See also Solid Waste, Recycle, Solvents, Used Oil)
*CLOSED LOOP RECYCLING
*CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS AT FACILITIES HANDLING SCRAP METAL RECLAMATION
*DEFINITION OF SOLID WASTE AND RECLAMATION _ _ _
*EXPORTING HAZARDOUS WASTE
*NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR RECYCLABLE MATERIALS
*PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY OF SPECULATIVE ACCUMULATION PROVISION
*SLUDGES WHEN RECLAIMED, REGULATION OF
*SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE, DEFINED FOR SPENT SULFURIC ACID
*SPENT LEAD ACID BATTERIES
*SPENT LEAD-ACID BATTERIES AND COUNTING REQUIREMENTS
*SQG QUANTITY DETERMINATION, MULTIPLE COUNTING EXEMPTION
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA SUBTITLE C REGULATIONS TO SILVER RECLAMATION OPERATIONS OF SPENT PHOTOGRAPHIC FIXER SOLUTIONS
BATTERY RECONDITIONING
BRIQUETTING OF FLUE DUST (K061) FOR STEEL PRODUCTION
BY-PRODUCT CRUDE OIL TANK BOTTOMS
CHARACTERISTIC SLUDGES RECLAIMED OR PROCESSED PRIOR TO USE AS AN INGREDIENT IN FERTILIZER
CHLOROFLUOROCARBONS (CFCs) AS REFRIGERANTS, RECYCLING OF SPENT
CLARIFICATION OF RCRA REGULATIONS AS THEY APPLY TO THE USE OF PERCHLOROETHYLENE IN DRY-CLEANING PROCESS !
JFICATION OF THE TERM "WHEN" IN 40 CFR 261.2(c)
FICATION OF THE USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS AND HOW THEY APPLY T^^BP OIL CONTAMINATED WITH HCFCs
9572.1988(03)
; 9441.il986(09)
: 94Sl,198ff(07) !
1 9432.1987(12) '
: 9504.1986(01) !
j i
9522.1988(05) i
! 9432.1987(12) ;
9451.1989(01) i
9480.1987(02)
9502.00-3
9441.!l986j(41) j
9441.1989(56)
: 9432.!1991:(01)
9441.il992;(30)
XREF : :
9432.;i985i(07) i
9433.a986i(10) :
! 9503.!l993l(01)
9503.51-1A
: 9432.;1986(06) I
: XREF ; ;
! j 1
XREF ; '
9471.11988(06) i
i 9502.11985(04) I
i_9444J1987(37a)i
9456.1987 (01) 1
9441.il988(13) 1
9441.il995(29) •
1 9441. '1986 (59) !
9441 .1986 (17) !
i 9497.11989(01) I
; 9497.|1995(01) !
9441.1986(64) j
9496.1994(01) -
9441.3.986(56) i
9441. ,1987 (58) !
1 9441.11986(37) |
i 9493.11985(03) |
! 9441.|l989(40) 1
1 9441.|l994(15) I
! 9441.!l993(O^U
: 9592.19931^^
12/23/88
01/28/86
03/24/86
10/28/87
06/12/86
11/30/88
10/28/87
05/03/89
10/29/87
08/04/86
05/20/86
11/30/89
09/27/91
09/09/92
/ /
11/19/85
04/24/86
12/02/93
12/24/85
02/06/86
/ /
/ /
12/30/88
06/30/85
,08/31/87
08/30/87
04/30/88
08/31/95
06/30/86
02/28/86
01/31/89
06/30/95
08/30/86
02/28/94
07/28/86
07/31/87
05/01/86
11/25/85
08/02/89
,06/10/94
105/06/93
04/05/93
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 109
CLARIFICATION ON WHEN USED MERCURY RELAYS/SWITCHES BECOME SPENT
CLARIFICATION ON: MANIFEST DOCUMENT NUMBER; F003, POOS, D001; WASTE DESTINED FOR RECYCLING; AND TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR CFC
COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS, RECYCLING A MIXTURE OF
COUNTING DRY CLEANING INDUSTRY WASTE ONLY AFTER REMOVAL FROM THE PROCESS - SQG RULE
DETERMINATION REGARDING THE REGULATORY STATUS OF A WASTE RECLAMATION SYSTEM
DISPOSAL OR RECLAMATION OF RAGS
DROVE RECLAMATION IN BRASS INDUSTRY, BY-PRODUCT DESIGNATION
ETCHANTS USED TO MANUFACTURE COPPER SALTS
FLUE DUST AND METAL HYDROXIDE SLUDGE RECYCLING/RECLAMATION
FREE-FLOWING MERCURY WHICH IS DISTILLED AND SOLD AS AN INGREDIENT IN AN INDUSTRIAL PROCESS
INTERPRETATION ON REGULATORY STATUS OF MERCURY RELAYS AND SWITCHES WHEN RECLAIMED
MERCURY SUITABLE FOR DIRECT USE (99% PURE) NOT SOLID WASTE
MERCURY THERMOMETERS, RECLAIMED OFF-SPEC AND BROKEN
MERCURY, REFINING/REUSE OF SCRAP
METAL GALVANIZING PROCESS RESIDUES AS BY-PRODUCTS/SECONDARY MATERIALS
MOBILE RECYCLING UNIT FOR REPROCESSING WASTE SOLVENTS
PESTICIDE RINSEATE TREATMENT/RECYCLING SYSTEM
PHOTOGRAPHIC FIXER RECYCLING
PICKLE LIQUOR RECOVERY UNIT AS AN INDUSTRIAL FURNACE
RAGS AND SIMILAR MATERIALS ABSORBING VOLATILES AND F-WASTES, HANDLING
RECLAIMED METHANOL IS A PRODUCT RATHER THAN A WASTE
RECLAIMING PRECIOUS METALS FROM DISCARDED AUTOMOTIVE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES
RECYCLED CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE SLUDGES
RECYCLED PRECIOUS METALS, BATTERIES FROM DEFENSE DEPT. SUPPLIES
RECYCLING NICKEL, COPPER AND CHROMIUM-CONTAINING ELECTROPLATING SLUDGES
RECYCLING OF MOLDING AND CASTING SANDS
REGULATORY DETERMINATION OF SPENT SOLDER BATHS, ALSO KNOWN AS "POT DUMPS"
REGULATORY DETERMINATIONS UNDER RCRA ON THE STATUS OF ZINC OXIDE PRODUCED BY AN ELECTRIC ARC STEEL FURNACE
REGULATORY STATUS OF AN AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DUST THAT IS FED TO AN ELECTROLYTIC METALS RECOVERY PROCESS TO RECOVER ZINC METAL
REGULATORY STATUS OF BRASS PARTICLES GENERATED IN THE BELTING AND BUFFING OF BRASS CASTINGS
REGULATORY STATUS OF DISULFIDE OIL WHICH IS BURNED IN A SULFURIC ACID FURNACE
REGULATORY STATUS OF NATURAL GAS REGULATORS THAT CONTAIN MERCURY UNDER RCRA
REGULATORY STATUS OF PLASTIC CHIPS FROM RECLAMATION OF LEAD-ACID BATTERIES
REGULATORY STATUS OF SEPARATION AND RECOVERY SYSTEMS SAREX PROCESS FOR RECYCLING PETROLEUM REFINERY OILY WASTES
REGULATORY STATUS OF SPENT FOUNDRY SAND UNDER RCRA
REGULATORY STATUS OF SPENT SOLDER BATHS, ALSO KNOWN AS "POT DUMPS"
REPROCESSING OF BATTERIES
RESIDUE FROM SPENT SOLVENT RECLAMATION CONSIDERED HAZARDOUS
SECONDARY LEAD SMELTER VARIANCES
SILVER RECOVERY IN THE PHOTOGRAPHIC INDUSTRY, CHEMICAL RECOVERY CARTRIDGES FOR
SOLVENT RECLAMATION OPERATIONS AT SEMICONDUCTOR FIRMS AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
SPENT FOUNDRY SANDS USED AS MOLDS IN THE CASTING PROCESS
SPENT LEAD-ACID BATTERIES BEING RECLAIMED
SPENT LEAD-ACID BATTERIES MANAGEMENT
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR USED/REUSED IS NOT SOLID WASTE
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR, DEFINITION AS HAZARDOUS
STILL BOTTOM WASTE GENERATED DURING THE PRODUCTION OF POLYSTYRENE
THERMAL OXIDIZER AND HYDRODECHLORINATION PROCESS BY-PRODUCT K-WASTES
VARIANCES FROM CLASSIFICATION AS A SOLID WASTE UNDER 40 CFR 260.31 (b) FOR SPENT CATALYSTS
ZINC OXIDE RECLAIMED FROM KILNS
Recovery
*ENERGY RECOVERY ON-SITE CONSTITUTES REUSE FOR THE GENERATOR PROCESSING EXEMPTION
*HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL IN INCINERATORS
*OFF-SPECIFICATION CIRCUIT PRINTING BOARDS - REGULATORY STATUS
*RECLAIMED COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS: REGULATORY STATUS
*RECOVERED MATERIALS, FEDERAL PROCUREMENT OF
9441.1994(25)
9441.1994 (26)
9441.1986(34)
9441.1986(67)
9441.1994(29)
9444.1989(13)
9441.1989(15)
9441.1986(82)
9441.1989(10)
9441.1994(08)
9444.1994(03)
9441.1986(43)
9441.1986(27)
9441.1986(06)
9441.1989(14)
9441.1986(30)
9471.1988(04)
9496.1990(01)
9432.1987(13)
9441.1989(50)
9441.1985(33)
9432.1989(03)
9441.1985(39)
9441.1986(85)
9441.1988(09)
9441.1986(01)
9441.1993(17)
9444.1994(09)
9441.1994(31)
9441.1993(15)
9441.1993(10)
9442.1994(06)
9441.1993(13)
9432.1993(01)
9441.1995(10)
9441.1993(18)
9497.1987(02)
9441.1984(03)
9444.1988(14)
9443.1987(01)
9441.1986(89)
9441.1995(22)
9497.1987(03)
9497.1989(02)
9441.1986(61)
9441.1987(39)
9441.1988(40)
9444.1987(44)
9433.1994 (02)
9444. 1988 (02a)
09/28/94
09/28/94
04/28/86
09/08/86
11/09/94
10/20/89
04/05/89
11/08/86
03/27/89
03/30/94
03/31/94
05/30/86
04/02/86
01/21/86
04/02/89
04/16/86
10/27/88
07/16/90
11/10/87
10/20/89
10/23/85
06/06/89
11/25/85
11/19/86
04/06/88
01/06/86
09/20/93
12/19/94
12/20/94
09/14/93
06/02/93
07/29/94
08/04/93
03/05/93
03/08/95
09/24/93
02/19/87
02/16/84
08/26/88
01/06/87
12/02/86
06/19/95
04/17/87
10/19/89
08/18/86
05/20/87
09/01/88
10/16/87
11/15/94
01/26/88
9495.1994(01)
9441.1986(87)
9441.1991(14)
9444.1992(07)
9493.1986(02)
05/31/94
11/30/86
08/01/91
11/30/92
03/30/86
-------
;
iss«if T^ef
=••!;
I jjiij jijM i B|J!
•! IBM
11
11
JC8YWORD I»EX
! ri i s
j
!*»
ATIOH!VERSUS:RBCLAMWioni FOR: SPENT! i!8AOiA:CjD2BATTERiBS , :' * ; s: -, HB " : ^i^
"'•REGULATORY STATUS OF METALS RECOVERY UNDER RCRA ! " - -'-• • ! * ! j -'i '' "- = — :
;£i-HJSED OIL STORAGE TANK BOTTOMS! HAZARDOUS HASTE OK USED OIL WHEN BURNED; FOR ENERGY RECOVERY*^. f l^i;;:-:.: I ^:;E ; , -.--
(•IAPPLICABILITY OF roos HAZARDOUS WASTE CODE TO NICKEL RECLAMATION PROCESS FOR ELBCTROLESS NICKEM PCATING ;S¥ENT(;SQLUTI;ONS :
CLARIFICATION AND/OR RECONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN EPA'S FINAL RULE ON RECOVERED OIL
"^CLARIFICATION AS TO WHETHER USED FIXER IS A "BY-PRODUCT" AND NOT SUBJECT TO THE DEFINITION OF SOLID HASTE WHEN BEING RECLAIMED
"^'CLARIFICATION OF RECYCLED USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS AS THEY APPLY TO HASTEWWER TREATMENT ACTIVITIES
^'CLARIFICATION OF THE REGULATORY STATUS UNDER RCRA OF SILVER RECOVERY UNITS USED ,"N PHOTO PROCESSING
- "-- IcLARIFICATION OF USED OIL REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO USED OIL BEING RECYCLED AND USFD OIL BEING BURNED IN AN INDUSTRIAL BOILER
"•CLASSIFICATION OF A MERCURY RECOVERY UNIT
;^'CLASSIFICATION OF OLIN MERCURY RECOVERY UNIT AS AN INDUSTRIAL FURNACE
"^COPPER-BEARING SECONDARY MATERIALS AS FEEDSTOCK
iatlDEFINITION OF INDUSTRIAL FURNACE AS IT APPLIES TO SMELTING, MELTING, AND REFINING FURNACES HANDLING SECONDARY MATERIALS
•5S(DETERMINATION WHETHER SECONDARY MATERIAL TRANSPORTED TO A CANADIAN COPPER SMELTER is A SOLID WASTE
»*J (EXEMPTION FOR COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
"HINTERPRETATION REGARDING THE REGULATORY STATUS OF SILVER RECOVERY UNITS UNDER RCRA REGULATIONS
~--' RECLAMATION OF SPENT ALKALINE ETCHANT-REQUEST FOR VARIANCE UNDER MOD. CLOSED-LOOP PROVISION
!"" RECOVERED LEAD AND LEAD ALLOYS FROM BATTERIES
' ^RECYCLING OF ZINC OXIDE BAGHOUSE DUST
-iREGULATORY DETERMINATION OF THE PRIMER NEUTRALIZATION UNIT "POPPING FURNACE"
*-- REGULATORY DETERMINATION ON THE STATUS OF A LEAD/COPPER METAL PRODUCED BY METALS RECYCLING TECHNOLOGIES (MRT)
^•'REGULATORY INTERPRETATION OF A MOBILE MERCURY RETORTING PROCESS FOR MERCURY CONTAMINATED SOILS FROM NATURAL GAS PIPELINE METERS
v J* (REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO TWO WASTE STREAMS THAT WOULD BE BILAYERED THROUGH PHASE SEPARATION AT A LICENSED TSDF
--riREGULATORY STATUS OF ACRYLIC PLASTIC DUST
^REGULATORY STATUS OF NATURAL GAS PIPELINE CONDENSATE
,•: 'REGULATORY STATUS OF NON-LISTED SLUDGE THAT is BEING RECYCLED
!M;REGULATORY STATUS OF USED NICKEL-CADMIUM BATTERIES
-' -RESIDUES FROM MUNICIPAL WASTE RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITIES
^"SILVER RECOVERY IN THE PHOTOGRAPHIC INDUSTRY
"^""SOLVENT-CONTAMINATED WASTESTREAMS FROM A PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURER
•™-SPENT AND RECLAIMED SOLVENTS, BLENDING OF RECLAIMED XYLENE
'tViSPENT SOLVENT RECOVERY, WASTE MANAGEMENT TAX
'SflSTILL BOTTOM WASTE FROM POLYSTYRENE PRODUCTION
^:,!TC RULE - IMPLEMENTATION
OIL, BURNING OF OFF-SPECIFICATION FUEL - DUMPING
iBiUSED REFRIGERANTS UNDER 40 CFR 261.2
v i-t *
Unused Materials
•UNUSED FORMULATIONS CONTAINING SODIUM PENTACHLOROPHENATE ARE F027
: CLARIFICATION OF CERTAIN ISSUES REGARDING OIL AND GAS WASTES
! OFF-SPECIFICATION JET FUELS, RECYCLING OF UNUSED
RETURNED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS
944l!.!l995!(17)T:
9441|.jl995!(27)ii
9592l.ll994l(02)li
^ « • : t I- i ~- S3L1 ^
" li » =4M
Page Wo, 110 s
H
11/30/94
10/31/94
09/30/94
09/21/94
05/03/95
08/16/95
03/22/94
08/04/95
02/08/94
05/26/94
12/17/93
03/22/88
12/06/93
06/30/95
07/27/88
10/05/94
10/29/85
12/10/91
11/04/87
09/19/94
08/19/94
11/29/93
10/04/94
02/02/95
04/15/94
06/10/94
10/22/93
05/27/86
01/06/87
12/06/88
04/15/87
05/20/86
09/01/87
10/01/90
07/31/86
10/18/90
9494i.ii994!(02)
949B'.1994;(03)i
9498,.!1993!(04),:
9441vl9B8i(08)r:
9488;.il993i(01);,
944l|jl995i(24)ji
9441^19941(28)1;
9433,1985(06):.
9443.:i987i(25);:
9489a994i(02);"
9441.1l994!(23);
.9498jl993,(03)i,
9441.:l994l(27)i:
9441,1995(03):;
9442,1994(05):;
9441J1994(17):'
9441.;1993(20)1;
9487.1986(08);;
9441.1987(02 );<
9441.1988;(49)'«
9441.1986 (41); =
9444.1987(38),:
9441.1990(29)*;
9441.1986(40)!!
9441.1990(28)'!
9444.1994(06)!: 08/31/94
9571.1993 (02)"j 11/05/93
9441.1989(39)1* 07/31/89
9455.1991(02); 05/16/91
RECOVERED OIL
(See Used Oil)
XREF
RECOVERY
(See Reclamation)
XREF
RECYCLE
(See also Reclamation, Solid Waste)
•CLOSED-LOOP RECYCLING EXCLUSION
«NITION OF SOLID WASTE
NITION OF SOLID WASTE AND RECLAMATION
XREF is / /
9441.1993(02)' 02/28/93
9441.1987(40)! 05/31/87
9444.1987 y^^ 08/31/87
7UA^
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No.
*BXPORTING HAZARDOUS WASTE
•LEAD-ACID BATTERIES AND UNIVERSAL WASTE,
*PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY OF SPECULATIVE ACCUMULATION PROVISION
'RECOVERED MATERIALS, FEDERAL PROCUREMENT OF
•RECYCLED USED OIL - TECHNICAL CRITERIA FOR LISTING, COURT DECISION
*REGULATION OF NICKEL/CADMIUM BATTERIES AS SCRAP METAL WHEN RECYCLED
*SHAM RECYCLING POLICY APPLIED TO CERTIFIED BIFs
•SMALL QUANTITY DETERMINATION FOR SOLVENT RECLAIMER
•SOLID WASTE DETERMINATION FOR SPILLED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS
•SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE GRANTS FOR STATES
•STORAGE PRIOR TO RECYCLING
•USED OIL AS DUST SUPPRESSANT
•USED OIL STORAGE TANK BOTTOMS: HAZARDOUS WASTE OR USED OIL WHEN BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY?
•WASTE MINIMIZATION AND RECYCLING ACTIVITIES THAT RESEMBLE CONVENTIONAL WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICE
AUTOMOTIVE FLUIDS, REGULATION OF
BATTERY RECONDITIONING
BATTERY RECYCLING AND EXPORT
BLAST SLAG TESTING PROCEDURES
BRASS DROSS SKIMMINGS, SEPARATION OF METALS AND OXIDES, BY-PRODUCT
BY-PRODUCT CRUDE OIL TANK BOTTOMS
CHARACTERISTIC SLUDGES RECLAIMED OR PROCESSED PRIOR TO USE AS AN INGREDIENT IN FERTILIZER
CHLOROFLUOROCARBON RECYCLING
CLARIFICATION OF HOW PROVISIONS IN CERCLA APPLY TO "SERVICE STATION DEALERS" THAT HANDLE USED OIL
CLARIFICATION OF HOW RCRA REGULATIONS APPLY TO OFF-SPECIFICATION FUELS THAT ARE BEING BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
CLARIFICATION OF THE TERM "WHEN" IN 40 CFR 261.2(c)
CLARIFICATION OF USED OIL REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO USED OIL BEING RECYCLED AND USED OIL BEING BURNED IN AN INDUSTRIAL BOILER
CLARIFICATION ON: MANIFEST DOCUMENT NUMBER; F003, F005, D001; WASTE DESTINED FOR RECYCLING; AND TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR CFC
CLEAN SOLVENT FROM RECYCLED SOLVENT-CONTAINING WASTE - STILL BOTTOMS
CLOSURE COST ESTIMATES BASED ON THIRD PARTY COSTS
COAL TAR DECANTER SLUDGE WASTE PILE (TOLEDO COKE)
COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS USED IN AIR BAGS - EFFECT ON RECYCLE OF FERROUS SCRAP FROM AUTOMOBILES
COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS, RECYCLING A MIXTURE OF
COMMERCIAL FERTILIZERS VERSUS SOIL AMENDMENTS
ETCHANTS USED TO MANUFACTURE COPPER SALTS
EXEMPTION FOR COMMERCIAL FERTILIZERS ONCE THE FERTILIZER IS PRODUCED
EXPORT REQUIREMENTS FOR SPENT BATTERIES SENT TO FOREIGN COUNTRIES FOR RECYCLING
FLUE DUST AND METAL HYDROXIDE SLUDGE RECYCLING/RECLAMATION
FLUFF RESIDUALS FROM FERROUS METALS RECYCLING (AUTOMOBILE SHREDDING)
FOUNDRY SANDS RECYCLED AND RETURNED TO THE FOUNDRY
FREE-FLOWING MERCURY WHICH IS DISTILLED AND SOLD AS AN INGREDIENT IN AN INDUSTRIAL PROCESS
GENERATOR RECYCLING HAZARDOUS WASTE ON-SITE
GUIDANCE FROM THE U.S. EPA ON THE CRUSHING OF MERCURY-CONTAINING LAMPS
HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL CADENCE PRODUCT 312, REGULATION OF
HAZARDOUS WASTE RECYCLERS
HAZARDOUS WASTE RECYCLING REGULATIONS TO A PROPOSED INK RECYCLING PROCESS
HAZARDOUS WASTES THAT ARE RECYCLED, HANDLING
INCINERATOR RESIDUES/RECYCLING DEFINED/ACCUMULATION
INDUSTRIAL FURNACES BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTES AND THE RESIDUALS GENERATED (LOUISIANA REG)
INDUSTRIAL PLATING OPERATIONS, STATUS OF VARIOUS WASTES FROM
LISTING OF TF-1, AN ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER FLUSHING AGENT
MANAGEMENT OF LEAD-ACID BATTERIES THAT ARE RECYCLED
MIXTURES OF SPENT SOLVENTS - F001-F005, REGULATORY STATUS OF
MIXTURES OF WASTES AND LEGITIMATE BURNING FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
MOBILE RECYCLING UNIT FOR REPROCESSING WASTE SOLVENTS
MOBILE SOLVENT RECYCLER, GENERATOR DETERMINATION FOR
NICKEL-CADMIUM BATTERIES RECYCLING
OFF-SPECIFICATION JET FUELS, RECYCLING OF UNUSED
9456.1987(01)
9593.1995(01)
9441.1995(29)
9493.1986(02)
9433.1988(02)
9441.1990(13d)
9488.1991(05)
9441.1987(10)
9441.1995(20)
9581.1988(01)
9475.1987(01)
9493.1985(06)
9592.1994(11)
9561.1994(02)
9441.1987(14)
9441.1986(56)
9497.1987(01)
9442.1989(09)
9441.1985(21)
9441.1986(37)
9493.1985(03)
9441.1988(32)
9592.1994(12)
9441.1994(18)
9441.1993(08)
9494.1994(02)
9441.1994(26)
9441.1987(26)
9477.1984(01)
9441.1987(98)
9441.1985(02)
9441.1986(34)
9493.1987(01)
9441.1986(82)
9493.1986(03)
9455.1987(01)
9441.1989(10)
9441.1988(48)
9441.1987(13)
9441.1994(08)
9453.1987(04)
9441.1995(21)
9494.1986(04)
9461.1988(01)
9441.1993(14)
9441.1986(76)
9551.1989(06)
9494.1987(02)
9441.1988(50)
9442.1986(04)
9497.1993(01)
9441.1984(06)
9494.1987(03)
9441.1986(30)
9432.1986(13)
9497.1991(02)
9441.1989(39)
08/30/87
12/31/95
08/31/95
03/30/86
11/30/88
05/31/90
10/01/91
02/28/81
05/31/95
11/01/88
04/30/87
12/30/85
09/30/94
07/31/94
03/06/87
07/28/86
02/12/87
11/03/89
06/06/85
05/01/86
11/25/85
07/21/88
11/10/94
07/11/94
05/06/93
02/08/94
09/28/94
04/17/8V
01/12/84
12/24/87
01/16/85
04/28/86
09/03/87
11/08/86
08/21/86
06/19/87
03/27/89
11/21/88
03/04/8V
03/30/94
07/14/87
06/05/95
04/11/86
08/31/88
09/01/93
10/08/86
05/03/89
04/15/87
12/07/88
05/06/86
12/23/93
04/10/84
08/31/87
04/16/86
08/06/86
05/30/91
07/31/89
-------
1 I
II II
I I j
II I I!
Hi
I I!
07/02/96
- c
[iiTJ'i,!
KEYWORD IHOBX
! I HIM
•i
ON^STTEKRECYCilMGHOF1 SSPBHTiSOlIVEKTS! BY: ! :U! ;i
PAJHT HASTES AS HAZARDOUS HASTES, RECYCLED/REUSEDiPStNT IHASTES '
PICKLE LIQUOR RECOVERY UNIT AS AN INDUSTRIAL FURNACE : •
POPPING F0RNACES-DOD DISPOSAL OF OUTDATED ORDNANCE BY INCINERATION -i METALS
QUANTUM TECH PLASMA ARC UNIT - REGULATORY CLASSIFICATION
RECLAMATION OF SPENT ALKALINE ETCHANT-REQUEST FOR VARIANCE UNDER MOD, CLOSED^LOOP PROVISION s
RECOVERY OF SULFUR AND CHLORIDE FROM SLURRIBD BAGHOUSE DUST s
RECYCLABLE CLOTH WIPERS AND DISPOSABLE INDUSTRIAL WIPERS USED TO CLEAN UP HAZARDOUS WASTES
RECYCLED CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS HASTE SLUDGES !
RECYCLED GASOLINE/HATER AND FUEL OIL/WATER MIXTURES
RECYCLING ACTIVITIES
RECYCLING EXCLUSION OF WASTES
RECYCLING NICKEL, COPPER AND CHROMIUM-CONTAINING ELECTROPLATING SLUDGES
RECYCLING OF ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE DUST
RECYCLING OF ELECTROPLATING SLUDGES (F006) FOR CEMENT/AGGREGATE MANUFACTURE
RECYCLING OF K061 AS AN INGREDIENT IN CEMENT
RECYCLING OF LEAD-ACID BATTERIES
RECYCLING OF MOLDING AND CASTING SANDS
REGION V FUEL-BLENDING FACILITIES CONCERNS '.
REGULATORY STATUS OF A GASIFICATION UNIT PROPOSED BY TEXACO TO BE BUILT IN EL DORADO, KANSAS
REGULATORY STATUS OF ACRYLIC PLASTIC DUST
REGULATORY STATUS OF RECLAIMED SOLVENT FROM USED DRY CLEANING FILTERS
REGULATORY STATUS OF RESIDUAL AVIATION FUELS THAT ARE BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
REGULATORY STATUS OF SPENT FOUNDRY SAND UNDER RCRA
REGULATORY STATUS OF USED RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL AEROSOL CANS
REPROCESSING OF BATTERIES
RESIDUE FROM SPENT SOLVENT RECLAMATION CONSIDERED HAZARDOUS
SCRAP METAL REMOVED FROM SPENT ALKALINE BATTERIES THAT ARE RECYCLED
SECONDARY MATERIALS REGULATION - USED SULFURIC ACID
SLUDGE WASTE HANDLING IF TEMP. EXCLUSION IS WITHDRAWN / FUTURE METALS RECOVERY-STEEL FACILITY! ~
SOLVENT RECLAMATION OPERATIONS AT SEMICONDUCTOR FIRMS AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS ~~
SOLVENT STILL AS RECYCLING UNIT - REGULATORY STATUS OF
SPENT LEAD-ACID BATTERIES BEING RECLAIMED
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR USED IN PRODUCTION OF FERRIC CHLORIDE
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR, USE/REUSE EXEMPTION AS APPLIED TO
SPENT SOLVENT RECOVERY, WASTE MANAGEMENT TAX ~
SPENT SULFURIC ACID ACCUMULATED SPECULATIVELY
SPENT SULFURIC ACID PICKLE LIQUOR USED TO PRODUCE FERTILIZER
STATUS OF UNLISTED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS WHEN RECYCLED -
STILL BOTTOM WASTE FROM POLYSTYRENE PRODUCTION ""
STILL BOTTOMS GENERATED AND REMOVED FROM A RECYCLING UNIT
STORAGE PERMIT FOR FACILITIES INVOLVED IN HAZARDOUS WASTE RECYCLING
TANK TREATMENT SYSTEM OF METAL-RICH RINSEWATERS
TC RULE - IMPLEMENTATION
THE STATUS OF UNUSED OFF-SPECIFICATION LEAD PLATES USED IN THE PRODUCTION OF LEAD-ACID AUTOMOTIVE BATTERIES,
TNT RED WATER, REUSE OF
TORPEDO PROPULSION UNITS SHIPPED FOR RECYCLING, REGULATION OF
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION FOR SCRAP METAL RECYCLER
TWO WASTE OIL MANAGEMENT PRACTICES REGULATORY STATUS
USE OF ON-SPECIFICATION USED OIL FUEL AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR »2 FUEL OIL IN MANUFACTURING ANFO BLASTING AGENTS
USED OIL BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY, INTERPRETATION OF SUBPART E
USED OIL CONTAMINATION THROUGH NORMAL USE OR MIXING WITH HAZARDOUS WASTES - RECYCLING DEFINED
USED OIL FILTERS - REGULATION
USED OIL FILTERS, REGULATORY DETERMINATION
USED OIL INTRODUCED INTO REFINERY PROCESS UNDER HAZARDOUS WASTE DERIVED REFINERY FUEL PRODUCTS EXEMPTION
WASTE-AS-FUEL RULES AT DOD FACILITIES, IMPLEMENTATION
-DERIVED FUELS AT IRON AND STEEL MILLS AS PRODUCTS OR WASTE FUELS,^•KjRMATION REQUIRED
>m
-^ J| 5J=—
-™ \: i; —
- ih ™r
9441.1981"(03]
9432.1987B13J
19441. 19831104)
9488.199i:(04)
=9433,19851(061
!9441.1992H33)
9441.1986iC53)
9441.1985'(39)
9441,.1986r(22)
59451.1989(01)
9441.19901(06)
9441.19881(09)
9441.1988JI27)
9441.1989!(19]
9441.19905(03]
9497.1989(03)
9441.1986(01)
9441.199li(17)
9441.1995;(18)
9441.19951(03)
9441.19921(11)
9441.1995i(04)
9441.19951(10)
9442.1993-102)
9497.1987(02)
9441.1984(03)
9441.1986i(79)
9441.19881(23)
9433.1986(17)
9441.19861(89)
9441.1985(24)
9497.1987(03)
9441.1985(27)
9441.1985(20)
9441.19861(41)
9441.1988!(19)
9493.1985(02)
_9444. 19931(01)
9444.19871(38)
3453. 19891(04)
9441.1989(11)
9483.1990(01)
9441.1990(29)
9441.1995:(31)
9441.19811(04)
9441.1986(14)
9432.00-11
9495.1991:101)
9592.1994(01)
9495.1989(01)
9441.1984^(30)
9441.1990(30)
9442.1990(05)
9441.1986(11)
9494.1986(02)
9441. 1986 Ufl
m
- i ^
-- -__ ^t.
= ' - ~= "==E
03/13/8:6 ; 1*0
04/06/81 *v«!
11/10/87 : "wail
06/08/83 i i ~m
09/30/91 "~"
10/29/85 i ! IB;
10/08/92 ! '
- 07/03/86 i ^,1
' 11/25/85 "3
, 03/19/86 »
= 05/03/89
t 03/19/90 i *i*:
04/06/88 ; ;!;;;
f 06/15/88 !
f 04/26/89 : ,!si
a 02/13/90 i "Of
i 11/17/89 V-*3-
T 01/06/86 "sJr"
r- 11/04/91 K-j"
05/25/95 , .L^V
2 02/02/95 =-hr|
i 05/28/92 i. "Ks
- 02/02/95 i "•.-«
' 03/08/95 «„::
10/07/93 ; ;.^fr
02/19/87 " :;::2
02/16/84 Wi
10/20/86 --
06/06/88 ; .= yat
09/30/86 - !S
12/02/86 !
06/27/85 ' "»"*
04/17/87 : ;,M
07/16/85 ,vy
06/05/85 , \ uA
05/20/86 ' i
05/26/88 ' '^*
11/14/85 ; -M,
02/23/93 , «i
09/01/87 HqSi
- 04/18/89 ' l
03/27/89 ' K
08/01/90
10/01/90 ,'K«
09/14/95 ";«r
04/10/81 i
02/25/86 '
02/11/86 *'?
- 06/05/91 ---£>
; 01/10/94 :i,:,jj
" 05/15/89 "
t 10/22/84 ;
1 10/30/90 J jjH!
it 10/30/90
I 02/11/86 : ; iai
' 03/19/86 ' '*"!
k 01/24/86 : MS!
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 113
Precious Metals
*EKPORT OF RECYCLABLE MATERIALS
*NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR RECYCLABLE MATERIALS
-
MATERIALS USED IN FERTILIZER PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT
MATERIALS USED IN FERTILIZER PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT
DISCARDED AUTOMOTIVE AND ELECTRONS DEVICES
RECYCLABLE MATERIALS WHERE PRECIOUS METALS ARE RECLAIMED
RECYCLED PRECIOUS METALS, BATTERIES FROM DEFENSE DEPT. SUPPLIES
rE=TT 0^^^
SILVERN" WASTES AND IN SEWER DISCHARGES FROM THE PHOTO-FINISHING INDUSTRY
SR ™RY S THE SSJSSSSc SSSS. CHEMICAL RECOVERY CARTRIDGES FOR
SPENT CYANIDE PLATING BATH SOLUTIONS FROM SILVER RECOVERY
USED X-RAY FILM AS A SPENT MATERIAL - SILVER RECLAMATION
SOILS FROM NATURAL GAS PIPELINE METERS
L™WASTE WHEN RETURNED TO THE UNITED STATES FROM aAPAN FOR REGENERATION
CARBON REGENERATION FACILITIES
CARBON REGENERATION FACILITIES
CARBON REGENERATION UNITS - REGULATORY STATUS
REGENERATION OF USED BATTERIES EXEMPTED FROM REGULATION
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR, DEFINITION AS HAZARDOUS
OF LOCATIONS AT WHICH LEADED BATTERIES ARE REGENERATED,
RECOVERY ON-SITE CONSTITUTES REUSE FOR THE GENERATOR PROCESSING EXEMPTION
*FILTERS USED TO RECLAIM CFC REFRIGERANT
•GENERATION AND RECYCLING
*SECOND^YHMATERIALS USED AS EFFECTIVE SUBSTITUTES FOR COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS
*SOLID AND HAZARDOU3 WASTE, DEFINED FOR SPENT SULFURIC ACID
BAGHOUSE DUSTS USED AS, OR TO PRODUCE, AGGREGATE
BRIQUETTING OF FLUE DUST (K061) FOR STEEL PRODUCTION
COAL TAR DECANTER SLUDGE WASTE PILE (TOLEDO COKE)
COLORED GLAZE SOLIDS COLLECTED IN POTTERY MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS
REMOVAL FROM THE PROCESS - SQG RUL,
DEIONIZATION ACID
DEIONIZATION ACID REUSED,
NOT A WASTE
9456.1986(01)
9441.1988(13)
9441.1985(28a)
9496.1994(01)
9441.1985(44)
9441.1995(27)
9441.1995(26)
9498.1993(04)
9488.1993(01)
9455.1991(01)
9441.1994(28)
9493.1991(05)
9493.1991(04)
9496.1990(01)
9432.1989(03)
9551.1989(03)
9441.1986(85)
9496.1993(01)
9498.1993(03)
9443.1986(15)
9441.1987(02)
9443.1987(01)
9441.1989(34)
9441.1986(42)
9497.1994(01)
9456.1994 (01)
9441.1986(26)
9442.1986(03)
9489.1991(04)
9441.1986(51)
9441.1987(39)
9497.1991(01)
9441.1995(01)
9495.1994(01)
9441.1992(32)
9441.1987(20)
9441. 1985 (28b)
9441.1992(13)
9441.1986(17)
9493.1991(03)
9441.1987(58)
9441.1989(40)
9441.1994(13)
9441.1994(15)
9441.1994(19)
9441.1987(75)
9441.1988(17)
9493.1986(05)
9441.1986(67)
9443.1986(11)
9441.1986(39)
10/30/86
04/30/88
07/30/85
02/28/94
12/18/85
08/16/95
08/04/95
12/17/93
12/06/93
02/05/91
10/05/94
10/11/91
10/11/91
07/16/90
06/06/89
12/20/89
11/19/86
12/27/93
11/29/93
06/26/86
01/06/87
01/06/87
07/06/89
05/20/86
11/30/94
12/16/94
04/02/86
04/02/86
08/02/91
07/02/86
05/20/87
03/04/91
01/12/95
05/31/94
09/30/92
03/31/87
07/31/85
05/31/92
02/28/86
06/21/91
07/31/87
08/02/89
05/19/94
06/10/94
07/11/94
09/04/87
05/18/88
09/11/86
09/08/86
05/12/86
05/12/86
-------
Kin
! j » ill
it
in n
I;!!!
07/02/96
j
, * use, »«
HI
! I •• is
.i-'iaipi1
KEYWORD 1MDBX1 S ^
IT I Hill
, ! r# -j
f t
! • ,"; , ; . : :
-DROSS FROM ALUMIWJM SMELTING! USfcD I jMiMAWAWWBio^ CEMEttt ! ; '**""""
EXCLUSIONS FOR K-HASTESiDENIED (LACLBDB STEEL) i i
^MERCURY SUITABLE FOR DIRECT USE (99* PURE) NOT SOLID WASTE
^MERCURY, REFINIHO/REUSE OF SCRAP I
3REGULATORY IHTERPRBTATION ON RINSEHATER FROM ALUMINUM ANODIZING
.REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR ON-SITE TREATMENT OF OXYGEN BREATHING APPARATUS luiMVMiuwiSTtli
I sREGULATORY STATUS AND MANAGEMENT OF DISPOSABLE AND LAUNDERABLE INDUSTRIAL RAGS AND WIPERS
REGULATORY STATUS OF COAL TAR DISTILLATES
REGULATORY STATUS OF CONTAMINATED GROUNDHATER AND LIMITATIONS ON DISPOSAL AND REUSE _ ;
REGULATORY STATUS OF DISULFIDE OIL WHICH IS BURNED IN A SULFURIC ACID FURNACE :
^REGULATORY STATUS OF HIGH PURITY CHEMICALS THAT ARE INITIALLY USED BY CUSTOMERS AND THEN SOLD TO OTHER BUSINESSES FOR
-REGULATORY STATUS OF RESIDUES FROM SECONDARY LEAD SMELTERS THAT RECYCLE K069 WASTES
; RESIDUES FROM SECONDARY LEAD SMELTERS THAT RECYCLE K069 WASTES
-JIEUSE/RECYCLE REGULATIONS IMPACT ON SPENT LEAD-ACID BATTERY RECYCLING
=SPENT ACIDS AS WATER CONDITIONER
; =SPENT FOUNDRY SANDS USED AS MOLDS IN THE CASTING PROCESS
/SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR USED/REUSED IS NOT SOLID WASTE -
-SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR, DEFINITION AS HAZARDOUS ''
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR, REUSE OF ' [ !-
JJSE/REVSE EXCLUSION TO RED WATER (K047) FROM WHICH SODIUM SULFITE IS RECOVERED AND WHICH IS USED JAS A FUEL ''
JJSED REFRIGERANTS UNDER 40 CFR 261.2 ^
VARIANCES FROM CLASSIFICATION AS A SOLID WASTE UNDER 40 CFR 260.31 (b) FOR SPENT CATALYSTS ! :
WASTE ACID AS WASTEWATER CONDITIONER AND AS INGREDIENT IN FERTILIZER ':
Use Constituting Disposal i!
;*RECLAIMED SPENT WOOD PRESERVATIVE EXCLUSION IN 261.4 (a) (9) 'i
j*USE CONSTITUTING DISPOSAL, RESIDUES FROM FIRE TRAINING EXERCISES ;
/APPLICABILITY OF RCRA USED OIL REGULATIONS TO USED OIL CONTAINED IN DISCARDED HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES •'
(CLARIFICATION ON HOW REUSE OF "WASTE RESINS" AS FEED STOCK TO MANUFACTURE NEW PRODUCTS ARE REGULATED UNDERf
5,COPPER PLATING SOLUTION
I JDECHARACTERIZATION AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTES THAT HAVE UNDERGONE CHEMICAL SOLIDIFICATION :
: (DETERMINATION REGARDING THE REGULATORY STATUS OF A WASTE RECLAMATION SYSTEM ;
(HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION OF "NICKEL MATTE" BY-PRODUCT
EK-WASTE FILTER CAKE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF CEMENT
1 (PROPOSED BEST DEMONSTRATED AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY (BOAT) FOR K061 WASTE ''
RECYCLING OF COKE BY-PRODUCT RESIDUES
^REGULATORY DETERMINATIONS UNDER RCRA ON THE STATUS OF ZINC OXIDE PRODUCED BY AN ELECTRIC ARC STEEL FURNACE
[REGULATORY STATUS OF DRIP GAS GENERATED ALONG NATURAL GAS TRANSMISSION PIPELINES '
.REGULATORY STATUS OF THE MANUFACTURE AND USE OF WASTE-DERIVED FERTILIZER
... .. (SECONDARY MATERIAL SUBJECTED TO NOTICE REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE US-CANADIAN BILATERAL TREATY
ISOIL CONTAMINATED WITH CHLORDANE AS A RESULT OF PESTICIDE APPLICATION
/SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR, REUSE OF :
JUSE OF PETROLEUM-CONTAMINATED SOILS AS AN INGREDIENT IN ASPHALT BATCHING
:WASTE ACID AS WASTEWATER CONDITIONER AND AS INGREDIENT IN FERTILIZER
JZINC OXIDE DUST RECLAIMED OR USED AS FERTILIZER
REFINERY WASTE
(See Petroleum Refinery Wastes)
!
REGENERATION
RCRA
1 i ii . !
II !! 1
;iih ;;
IIS i
i • n i
'i ii i
* . .
i
;!
f f- , '
:s ii ;
III :!
'
,1111 j,
: r «•
- f :L '"
FURTHER USE
i
1111 1
ii :*: !
Ill i
PI IIPPI — I
II !» i
:i! iiB" i
f; i'p ! ;
ii:i9^41.1989{01)
!:^ !9441.1989(48)
IiM944i. 1386(43)
!!I|9441.198«(06)
9441.1992(23)
I!M944A,1994(10)
" '944:1.1993(19)
944:1.1992(20)
944:1.1989(03):
9441.1993(10)
9441.1994(24)
9441.1991(143)
9496.1991(01)
9497.1986(01)
9441.1987(73)
9441.1995(22)
9441.1986(61)
9441.1987(39)
9441.1987(17)
9441.1987(42)
9495.1987(06)
9441.1990(28)
9433.1994(02)
9441.1986(80)
9441.1991(19)
9493.1985(04)
9592.1994(06)
9441.1994(19)
9443.1986(04)
_ 9493.1985(05)
: 9441.1994(29)
,,9441.1994(32)
9441.1990(35)
9441.1988(06)
9441.1992(37)
9444.1994(09)
9444.1993(03)
9493.1993(01)
9441.1989(29)
9444.1986(20)
9441.1987(17)
9493.1991(02)
9441.1986(80)
9441.1987(61)
I
j
:
-
Page Wo. 114
02/07/89
09/12/89
05/30/86
01/21/86
07/23/92
05/09/94
09/27/93
07/09/92
01/24/89
06/02/93
08/30/94
08/05/91
08/05/91
02/06/86
08/31/87
06/19/95
08/18/86
05/20/87
03/31/87
06/09/87
04/17/87
10/18/90
11/15/94
10/20/86
12/01/91
11/30/85
07/11/94
07/11/94
01/22/86
12/13/85
11/09/94
12/23/94
12/21/90
03/09/88
10/29/92
12/19/94
09/09/93
09/23/93
'06/15/89
09/29/86
03/31/87
06/20/91
10/20/86
08/12/87
XREF
(See Recycle)
XREF
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 115
REGULATED UNIT
(See also Corrective Action, Groundwater Monitoring)
FINANCIAL ASSURANCE FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION
GROUNDWATER MONITORING AT REGULATED UNITS NEAR SWMUs THAT HAVE IMPACTED GROUND WATER
Definition
*BDAT FOR WASTEWATER
'ELECTROPLATING AND ELECTROLESS PLATING LISTINGS
'HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE
*LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS DEFINITIONS
'REMOVAL OF TC WASTE FROM A SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT
'SKINNER LIST
'SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE, DEFINED FOR SPENT SULFURIC ACID
'TANK WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT DEFINITIONS
*USED OIL, DEFINITION OF
'WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT DEFINITION
AQUEOUS AS USED IN THE CORROSIVITY CHARACTERISTIC
BATCH, DEFINITION OF
BOILERS USED IN GREENHOUSE OPERATIONS ARE INDUSTRIAL BOILERS
BULKING OR CONTAINERIZING COMPATIBLE HAZARDOUS WASTES FOR TRANSPORTATION
DEACTIVATION (POPPING) FURNACES AS INCINERATORS
EMPTY CONTAINERS REGULATORY STATUS
EVAPORATOR USED TO REMOVE WATER FROM HAZARDOUS WASTE
GENERATOR WITH RESPECT TO REGULATION OF OPERATIONAL WASTES FROM SHIPS, DEFINITION
HEAT RECOVERY UNIT AS A BOILER OR AN INCINERATOR
HOLDING, TEMPORARY, PERIOD, STORAGE, AND DISPOSAL (DEFINITIONS)
IN-EXISTENCE AND UNDER CONSTRUCTION-DEFINITIONS
INTEGRAL DESIGN STANDARD IN BOILER DEFINITION (LUBRIZOL)
LIQUID, FREE LIQUID, RELEASABLE LIQUID DEFINITIONS
MARINE DEBRIS IN WATERS, DISPOSAL OF
OPERATED TO CONTAIN, DEFINITION
PIPELINE TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
SECONDARY CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS CERTIFICATION
SLUDGE DEHYDRATION EQUIPMENT AS A WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT
SLUDGE DEHYDRATION EQUIPMENT THAT IS PART OF A WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
SLUDGE DRYER ADDED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT-EFFECT ON WWTU EXEMPTION
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNIT DEFINED FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION UNDER 3004 (u)
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNIT FOR THE PURPOSE OF CORRECTIVE ACTION UNDER 3004 (u) , DEFINITION OF
STILL BOTTOM WASTE GENERATED BY A POLYSTYRENE PRODUCTION FACILITY
SULFUR RECOVERY FURNACES ARE INDUSTRIAL FURNACES SUBJECT TO THE WASTE-AS-FUEL RULES
THREE AND FOUR-SIDED, FLOORED STRUCTURES, REGULATORY CLASSIFICATION OF
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION APPLICABILITY TO A BAGHOUSE SYSTEM
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION APPLICABILITY TO A BAGHOUSE SYSTEM
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION FOR SCRAP METAL RECYCLER
UCAPCO APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE UNDER 3004(c)(2) OF RCRA
XREF
9502.1986(13)
9481.1987(05)
9432.1986(16)
9432.1989(01)
9441.1988(30)
9551.1986(23)
9443.1991(02)
9445.1985(06)
9441.1986(17)
9432.1988(03)
9431.1988(01)
9432.1988(05)
9443.1987(19)
9432.1989(05)
9432.1986(03)
9432.1990(02)
9432.1987(07)
9432,. 1990(03)
9432.1987(03)
9432.1986(05)
9432.1985(08)
9432.1986(12)
9432.1989(02)
9432.1985(10)
9432.1989(04)
9432.1987(12a)
9483.1989(06)
9432.1986(08)
9483.1988(18)
9432.1987(08)
9522.1988(02)
9432.1986(01)
9502.1987(07)
9502.00-6
9432.1988(01)
9432.1986(04)
9432.1987(02)
9432.1987(01)
9432.1986(15)
9432.00-1
9480.1987(02)
/ /
08/22/86
06/17/87
12/30/86
08/30/89
06/30/88
12/30/86
11/01/91
08/30/85
02/28/86
03/30/88
01/30/88
10/30/88
09/14/87
12/05/89
01/09/86
03/01/90
07/17/87
09/13/90
05/01/87
02/05/86
11/20/85
07/28/86
05/16/89
12/30/85
07/20/89
11/04/87
11/30/89
04/30/86
12/12/88
08/03/87
03/07/88
01/06/86
07/24/87
07/02/87
02/11/88
01/21/86
04/02/87
03/17/87
12/22/86
02/11/86
10/29/87
F-Wastes
'MIXED WASTE AND LAND BAN
9551.1989(02) 03/30/89
REGULATED WASTES
(See Hazardous Waste Identification, Solid Waste)
REGULATION
XREF
XREF
-------
SI ![tf ! fljB1 !i
! M
! si i • m a i tv i «• = ii
;;MI (i
i iMflilil Ml M
! M!1I!I
- L _ : i _jxi __ -/=-. _ - __^ : . ^ • _
; =;: • i;f:M
s --« P K=
7f ovov**! 11II
,,P»9
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 117
Exposure Information
ATSDR HEALTH ASSESSMENTS UNDER RCRA 3019
EXPOSURE INFORMATION REPORT REVIEW IN CONJUNCTION WITH ATSDR
GUIDANCE ON USING ALTERNATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT APPROACHES IN DETERMINING INCINERATOR METALS EMISSION LIMITS
Health Assessments
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (CAP) , CONTENTS AND USE OF
HEALTH ASSESSMENT INFORMATION IN LISTING DECISIONS
HEALTH BASED VALUES FOR CHEMICAL LIST
HEALTH BASED VALUES FOR PAH'S IN COKE BY-PRODUCT WASTES
HEALTH STATUS OF PAH'S IN COKE BY-PRODUCT WASTES
HEALTH-BASED LEVEL FOR CYANIDE
INCLUSION OF EMISSIONS FROM OB/OD UNITS IN THE HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT FOR A CHEMICAL AGENT DISPOSAL FACILITY
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
Risk
HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES, APPLICATION OF
Risk Analysis
RISK-BASED METHODOLOGIES ON LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR WASTE STREAMS - TANK RISK ANALYSIS
RUN-OFF
LEACHATE AND PRECIPITATION RUN-OFF AT LFs, WASTE PILES, AND LT UNITS, HAZARDOUS WASTE FROM MIXTURE OF
PRECIPITATION WHICH IS CORROSIVE DUE TO CONTACT WITH EXEMPT WASTES (COAL GASIFICATION ASH)
WOOD PRESERVING AND SURFACE PROTECTION FACILITIES, CONTROLLING ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES FROM
SAMPLE ANALYSIS
(See Analytic Methods)
SAMPLING
(See Analytic Methods)
SAMPLING PLAN
(See Analytic Methods)
SANITARY LANDFILL
(See Municipal Landfill)
SCRAP METAL
(See also Solid Waste)
'CLARIFICATION OF BY-PRODUCT VERSUS SCRAP METAL
BATTERIES, SCRAP METAL, AND PRECIOUS METALS
CLARIFICATION ON: MANIFEST DOCUMENT NUMBER; F003, F005, D001; WASTE DESTINED FOR RECYCLING; AND TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR CFC
DROVE RECLAMATION IN BRASS INDUSTRY, BY-PRODUCT DESIGNATION
HAZARDOUS WASTES THAT ARE RECYCLED, HANDLING
RECLAIMING PRECIOUS METALS FROM DISCARDED AUTOMOTIVE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES
REGULATORY DETERMINATION OF SPENT SOLDER BATHS, ALSO KNOWN AS "POT DUMPS"
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR ON-SITE TREATMENT OF OXYGEN BREATHING APPARATUS (OBA) CANISTERS
REGULATORY STATUS OF BRASS PARTICLES GENERATED IN THE BELTING AND BUFFING OF BRASS CASTINGS
9523.1986(05)
9523.1986(02)
9488.1992(02)
9502.1987(04)
9442. 1986 (04a)
9445.1989(02)
9551.1989(04)
9551.1989(05)
9442.1988(02)
9489.1995(01)
9523.00-12
9486.1985(01)
9551.1986(07)
9441.1986(25)
XREF
9441.1984(37)
9441.1986(31)
9441.1986(28)
11/21/86
07/31/86
11/17/92
03/13/87
05/09/86
07/18/89
07/06/89
06/12/89
03/30/88
01/30/95
03/30/87
03/27/85
06/19/86
03/26/86
/ /
11/14/84
04/21/86
04/07/86
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
9441.
9441.
9441,
9441,
9441,
9432
9441
9441
9441
1990(09a)
1985(44)
1994(26)
1989(15)
1986(76)
1989(03)
1993(17)
1994(10)
1993(15)
03/31/90
12/18/85
09/28/94
04/05/89
10/08/86
06/06/89
09/20/93
05/09/94
09/14/93
-------
Si;
i!«
07/02/96 i « = fi jiKEffiORD
• REGULATORY STATUS OP SPENT SOLDER BATHS, ALSO JCNOHN AS "POT DUMPS" ° ;:
REGULATORY: STATUS OF USED CUTTINGhOILS ADD USED OIL, COATED STEEL TURNINGS GENERATED DURING MACHINING OPERATIONS
i s REGULATORY! STATUS! OF USED RESIDENTIAL AND COWERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL AEROSOL CANS
! j REGULATORY! STATUS! OF HASTE AEROSOL CANS i
SCRAP METAL REMOVED FROM SPENT ALKALINE BATTERIES THAT ARE RECYCLED ;
i ! TC RULE DELAY OF IMPOSITION ON OIL FILTERS ' I
TORPEDO PROPULSION UNITS SHIPPED FOR RECYCLING, REGULATION OF
Dental Amalgam :
SCRAP AMALGAM FILLINGS FROM DENTISTS, DISPOSAL OF
I SCRAP DENTAL AMALGAM
Page Ko^ US
9441.1993 (IB)
9592a993(09)
9442.1993(02)
9442.1994(01)
9441.1986(79)
9441.1991(15)
9441.1986(14)
9441.1989(22)
9441.1989(43)
09/24/93
11/17/93
10/07/93
01/04/94
10/20/86
09/25/91
02/25/86
05/17/89
08/17/89
SCRUBBER
(See also Sludge) . !
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA TO VARIOUS PRODUCTS (E.G., CLINKER, FERTILIZER) PRODUCED BY A CEMENT: KILN EQUIPPED WITH A RECOVERY SCRUBBER
IS SCRUBBER WASTE FROM A SCRUBBER IN A CLOSED-LOOP FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION CONSIDERED A SOLID WASTE?
REGULATORY STATUS OF PRODUCTS (INCLUDING CLINKER AND FERTILIZER) PRODUCED IN CEMENT KILNS EQUIPPED WITH A RECOVERY SCRUBBER
Baghouse Dust
MINING WASTE EXCLUSION FOR A FERROALLOY FACILITY :
_XRBF / /
9441.1994(14) 06/09/94
t9441.1995(14) 04/12/95
9441^1994(12) 05/17/94
9441,1986(48) 06/10/86
SCRUBBER WATER
(See Incineration)
XREF1
SECONDARY CONTAINMENT
(See also Tank System, Minimum Technological Requirements)
*CHANGES AT INTERIM STATUS TANK FACILITIES
••CHANGES TO INTERIM STATUS TANK FACILITIES
•CONTINGENT CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE PLANS FOR TANKS
*GENERATOR ACCUMULATION AND SECONDARY CONTAINMENT
'HAZARDOUS WASTE TANK REGULATIONS
•HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS
•HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS - INSTALLATION/CERTIFICATION OF SECONDARY CONTAINMENT
•INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS
•INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT FOR TANKS AND POST-CLOSURE
•SECONDARY CONTAINMENT FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS
•SECONDARY CONTAINMENT FOR TANKS
•SECONDARY CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS
•SECONDARY CONTAINMENT VARIANCES FOR TANKS
•TANK INTEGRITY ASSESSMENTS
CLARIFICATION OF THE USE OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS TO CONTAIN HAZARDOUS WASTE SPILLS
CONCRETE LINERS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE TANK SYSTEMS
LOADING/UNLOADING AREA IN THE DEFINITION OF TANK SYSTEM
OPERATED TO CONTAIN, DEFINITION
PUMP EXEMPTION FROM SECONDARY CONTAINMENT
SECONDARY CONTAINMENT FOR EXISTING HAZARDOUS WASTE TANK SYSTEMS
SECONDARY CONTAINMENT FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS
SECONDARY CONTAINMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR ABOVE GROUND WELDED FLANGES AND SEALLESS VALVES
SECONDARY CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS CERTIFICATION
STANDARDS FOR SECONDARY CONTAINMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TANK SYSTEMS
TANK SYSTEM DESIGN-SECONDARY CONTAINMENT
TEMPORARY PERIOD AND HOLDING DEFINED
XREF!
9528,; 1987 (09)
9483.:1988(16)
9483.:i987(08)
9483Jl986(10)
9483.1986(05)
9483.1987(07)
9483.1988(13)
9483.1987(06)
9483.1989(04)
9483.1988(06)
_9483.1987(13)_
9483.1989(07)
9483.1986(08)
9483.1987(15)
9483.1993(01)
9483.1988(04)
9483.1988(07)
9483.1989(06)
9483.1988(11)
9483.1989(03)
9483.1987(16)
9483.1987(17)
9483.1988(18)
9483.1989(02)
9483,1987(05)
9522.1986,101)
08/30/87
09/30/88
05/30/87
11/30/86
08/30/86
05/30/87
06/30/88
05/30/87
10/30/89
04/30/88
07/30/87
11/30/89
10/30/86
08/30/87
10/07/93
03/16/88
03/17/88
11/30/89
06/09/88
03/14/89
09/11/87
09/23/87
12/12/88
01/09/89
05/29/87
09/01/86
-------
07/02/36
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No.
^"'CLARIFICATION OF REGULATORY LANGUAGE WITH RESPECT TO PERMITTED HAZARDOUS WASTE CONTAINER STORAGE FACILITIES
Leak Detection
* HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS
*LEAK DETECTION REQUIREMENTS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS
*LEAK NOTIFICATION AT A DOUBLE-LINED SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT
9482.1995(01) 06/30/95
WASTE LANDFILLS, SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, AND WASTE PILES
CONTAINMENT AND DETECTION OF RELEASE FROM HAZARDOUS STORAGE TANK SYSTEMS
SECONDARY CONTAINMENT FOR PIPING SYSTEMS
Leakage
*RELEASES FROM 90-DAY ACCUMULATION TANKS t1™00
LEAKS, SPILLS, AND ILLEGAL DISCHARGES OF LISTED WASTES TO SURFACE WATERS,
MIXTURE RULE APPLIED TO
Release
3008 (h) OF THE SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL ACT, INTERPRETATION OF
CONTAMINATED GROUND WATER AND VOLATILES FROM AIR STRIPPING, TREATMENT OF
CORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES
CORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES
ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES FROM WOOD PRESERVING PLANTS
FEDERAL FACILITIES INVENTORY UNDER RCRA 3016
FIRE TRAINING PITS, REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR
GROUNDWATERCLEANUP STANDARDS/ACLs IN DRAFT HSWA PERMIT (INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY)
HSWA APPLIED TO FEDERAL FACILITIES (DOE-OAK RIDGE)
PIPELINE TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION PROCEDURES AND AUTHORITIES
SOLIDSWASTE MANAGEMENT^!?' FOR^H^PURPOSE^rcORRECTIVE ACTION UNDER 3004 (u) , DEFINITION OF
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNITS, INFORMATION ON
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
WASTE PILES AND POST-CLOSURE PERMITS, APPLICATION OF NOVEMBER 1988 DEADLINE TO
WOOD PRESERVING AND SURFACE PROTECTION FACILITIES, CONTROLLING ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES FROM
Sumps
*APPLICABILITY OF SUBTITLE I
*SUMPS IN THE PART B PERMIT APPLICATION ,„„„,,„,
CARBON REGENERATION FACILITY, MIXTURE OF SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTES (CALGON)
TRMIT FOR°RE«OTE SECOND^ CONSENT AREA FOR DIRECT OFFLOADING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE-DERIVED FUEL INTO A CEMENT KILN
TORPEDO PROPULSION UNITS SHIPPED FOR RECYCLING, REGULATION OF
WOOD TREATMENT CYLINDER CREOSOTE SUMPS
SECONDARY MATERIALS
(See Solid Waste)
SECONDARY TREATMENT
(See Treatment)
SECURITY
SECURITY REQUIREMENTS AT FACILITIES
9483.1986(07)
9483.1986(03)
9484.1985(02)
9483.1986(13)
9484.1992(01)
9483.1988(10)
9483.1987(10)
9453.1986(05)
9441.1986(07)
9502.1985(09)
9441.1986(86)
9502.00-2
9502.1986(06)
9444.1986(07)
9502.1987(03)
9489.1987(02)
9481.1987(02)
9502.1985(06)
9432.1986(08)
9502.1986(02)
9502.1987(05)
9502.00-6
9502.1986(013)
9523.00-14
9501.1985(01)
9441.1986(28)
9483.1988(05)
9502.1985(05)
9441.1986(33)
9483.1986(12)
9483.1988(02)
9441.1986(14)
9441.1986(69)
10/30/86
08/30/86
08/30/85
12/30/86
07/31/92
06/03/88
07/09/87
08/30/86
01/23/86
12/16/85
11/20/86
04/18/86
04/15/86
04/07/86
03/06/87
07/22/87
03/10/87
10/29/85
04/30/86
01/31/86
04/02/87
07/02/81
01/23/86
03/14/86
10/01/85
04/07/86
03/30/88
08/31/85
04/23/86
12/30/86
01/28/88
02/25/86
09/12/86
XREF
XREF
XREF / /
9472.1988(01) 06/02/8B
-------
1 «» I
i ; i
:«
1^07/02/96
Hi!
KEYWORD JHBSX
•! I l!!»':'" «!'i'f I!1
!i!
: a!1!!!
:a >!i «•;• •
!j iii " li::;"^:^
I?
SEWAGE SLUD0E I
(See Haatewater)
SHAM RECYCLING
SHOOTING RANGES^ !
ft:
(See Boilers and Indus* rybilFiiKaffljIl IN liji ill
XREF ;*
XREF
m
K i
-ft:?
USE OF LEAD SHOT AT SHOOTING RANGES;
USE OF LEAD SHOT AT SHOOTING RANGES
SIC CODES
(•Ij:
« ii ;' Stoa
XREF;B:!
"
S; i, REGULATION OF OILY HAZARDOUS PETROLEUM: REFINERY WASTES«f - '•--
'~\- SIC CODE F°R A STEEL MANUFACTURER/PROCESSOR, PICKLE LJQUOR;;SLUDGE - POINT OF!WASTE GENERATION;
'^ '- SIGNATURES !;
jj^ (See Permit Application) "-- ~_
:' SITING
Mi»
i; j (See also Public Participation) ;
Capacity
C -?, *TREATMENT CAPACITY !; ii :
; CAPACITY VARIANCES AND UNDERGROUND INJECTION
i :if EXTENSION OF APPLICABLE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
w ' HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT CAPACITY AND RCRA CONSISTENCY ISSUES
U "". NATIONAL CAPACITY VARIANCE FOR INORGANIC SOLIDS DEBRIS
y a NEW HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY SITING PREVENTIONS
jj:( Location
g-i CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTES GENERATED AT PRIMARY METAL SMELTING AND REFINING SITES
jpi! COMBINED NRC-EPA SITING GUIDELINES FOR DISPOSAL OF COMMERCIAL MIXED LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE AND HAZARDOUS WASTE
fij JURISDICTION AND REGULATION OF MIXED WASTE MANAGEMENT INCLUDING INCINERATION AND LOCATION CRITERIA
.- LOCATION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES
PERMITS FOR PLACEMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN UNDERGROUND SALT MINES
PROPOSED RULES IMPACT ON PERMIT DEADLINES
TIME OF TRAVEL METHOD FOR THE GUIDANCE CRITERIA FOR IDENTIFYING AREAS OF VULNERABLE HYDROGEOLOGY
VULNERABILITY GUIDANCE
VULNERABLE HYDROGEOLOGY GUIDANCE CRITERIA
, 09/24/92
01/15/92
XREF : II
9493.Jl991-(Ol) '• 01/08/91
9441.1985(18)r 05/21/85
1 - • SS:
XREF _ / /
XREF
9525.1986 (07):"^'
9489.1990(01):;;
9551.1988 (09)J
9572.1988(03)M:
9551.1990(07)^
9523.1987(02) Bi
12/30/86
08/30/90
08/11/88
12/23/88
10/14/90
09/14/87
SKINNER LIST
SLUDGE
(See Appendix IX) (See also Groundwater Monitoring, Delisting)
(See also Wastewater)
*POLLUTION CONTROL SLUDGE FROM TREATMENT OF MINING WASTE - EXCLUSION
•SLUDGES WHEN RECLAIMED, REGULATION OF
SLOWDOWN SLURRY/SLUDGE FROM PRIMARY COPPER PRODUCTION
AC^^>LANT
9443.1986(16) ri: 07/09/86
9480.00-14 ^ 03/13/87
9541.1986(14)^ 07/03/86
9472.1991(01)^ 10/01/91
9472.1986(04) 06/04/86
9501.1987(03) 12/28/87
9472.1986(06) 07/08/86
9481.1987(01) 02/25/87
9481.1987(03) 06/03/87
XREF
XREF / /
9441.1985(09)^ 02/28/85
9441.1986(59)" 06/30/86
9441.1989(3^^07/06/89
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 121
CARBON REGENERATION FACILITIES
CERTIFICATION/NOTIFICATION FOR MULTIPLE-CONSTITUENT WASTES SUBJECT TO LDRs
CLARIFICATION OF THE REGULATORY STATUS UNDER RCRA OF SILVER RECOVERY UNITS USED IN PHOTO PROCESSING
DETERMINATION WHETHER SECONDARY MATERIAL TRANSPORTED TO A CANADIAN COPPER SMELTER IS A SOLID WASTE
ELECTROCHEMICAL MACHINING WASTES AND THE SCOPE OF THE F006 LISTING
EXPORT OF HAZARDOUS WASTES UTILIZED FOR PRECIOUS METALS RECLAMATION
F006 LISTING APPLIED TO PRINTING INDUSTRY
F019 LISTING AND THE CONVERSION COATING PROCESS
FLUE DUST AND METAL HYDROXIDE SLUDGE RECYCLING/RECLAMATION
INDUSTRIAL PLATING OPERATIONS, STATUS OF VARIOUS WASTES FROM
LDR DETERMINATION OF WASTE STREAM DILUTION
PETROLEUM REFINERY WW, MIXTURE AND DERIVED-FROM RULES
RECYCLED CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE SLUDGES
RECYCLING NICKEL, COPPER AND CHROMIUM-CONTAINING ELECTROPLATING SLUDGES
RECYCLING OF ELECTROPLATING SLUDGES (F006) FOR CEMENT/AGGREGATE MANUFACTURE
REGULATORY STATUS OF ACRYLIC PLASTIC DUST
SCRUBBER BRINE/SLUDGE PRODUCED IN INCINERATION OF A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE
SECONDARY SLUDGES FROM BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF REFINERY WASTEWATERS
SLUDGE WASTE HANDLING IF TEMP. EXCLUSION IS WITHDRAWN / FUTURE METALS RECOVERY-STEEL FACILITY
SLUDGES GENERATED FROM THE FIRST CLEANING STAGES OF PHOSPHATING PROCESS
SLUDGES WITHIN SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, NEWLY REGULATED DUE TO TC RULE
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION FOR SCRAP METAL RECYCLER
WASTE-DERIVED FUELS AT IRON AND STEEL MILLS AS PRODUCTS OR WASTE FUELS, INFORMATION REQUIRED
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE EXEMPTION FOR ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM WOOD PRESERVING PROCESSES USING CREOSOTE AND/OR PENTACHLOROPHENOL
ZINC OXIDE DUST RECLAIMED OR USED AS FERTILIZER
ZINC PLATING, WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES GENERATED FROM
Baghouse Dust
*BAGHOUSE DUST GENERATED FROM REMELTING PRIMARY PRODUCED STEEL
BAGHOUSE FLUE DUST AND ZINC OXIDE SLUDGE USED IN ZINC CHEMICALS PRODUCTION
MATERIALS USED IN FERTILIZER PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT
MATERIALS USED IN FERTILIZER PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT
RECOVERY OF SULFUR AND CHLORIDE FROM SLURRIED BAGHOUSE DUST
RECYCLING OF ZINC OXIDE BAGHOUSE DUST
REGULATORY STATUS OF AN AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DUST THAT IS FED TO AN ELECTROLYTIC METALS RECOVERY PROCESS TO RECOVER ZINC METAL
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION APPLICABILITY TO A BAGHOUSE SYSTEM
Emission Control Wastes
COAL/FOSSIL FUEL COMBUSTION WASTES EXCLUDED FROM SUBTITLE C PENDING FURTHER STUDY
EMISSION CONTROL DUST/SLUDGE FROM ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE AT FOUNDRY NOT A K061 WASTE
EXEMPTION FOR COMMERCIAL FERTILIZERS ONCE THE FERTILIZER IS PRODUCED
K061, EMISSION CONTROL DUST/SLUDGE FROM PRODUCTION OF STEEL IN ELECTRIC FURNACES
REGULATORY STATUS OF NON-LISTED SLUDGE THAT IS BEING RECYCLED
RESIDUES FROM SECONDARY LEAD SMELTERS THAT RECYCLE K069 WASTES
STAINLESS STEEL PRODUCTION RESIDUES
Scrubber
CLARIFICATION ABOUT THE SCOPE OF EPA'S ADMINISTRATIVE STAY FOR A PORTION OF THE K069 HAZARDOUS WASTE LISTING
IS SCRUBBER WASTE FROM A SCRUBBER IN A CLOSED-LOOP FLUE GAS DESULFC3IZATION CONSIDERED A SOLID WASTE?
MINING WASTE EXCLUSION FOR A FERROALLOY FACILITY
Sludge Dryers
PERMIT-EXEMPT STATUS OF SLUDGE DRYERS ADDED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNITS
RD&D PERMIT FOR A SLUDGE DRYING PROCESS IN A WASTEWATER SYSTEM
SLUDGE DEHYDRATION EQUIPMENT
9441.1986(26)
9551.1991(10)
9441.1995(26)
9441.1995(24)
9444.1987(03)
9455.1991(01)
9444.1987(19)
9444.1987(22)
9441.1989(10)
9441.1988(50)
9551.1990(06)
9441.1985(29)
9441.1985(39)
9441.1988(09)
9441.1989(19)
9441.1995(03)
9441.1984(05)
9441.1985(08)
9433.1986(17)
9444.1986(11)
9484.1991(01)
9523.00-12
9432.00-1
9441.1986(08)
9441.1986(29)
9444.1984 (04)
9441.1987(61)
9441.1984(29)
9444.1984(16)
9441.1985(06)
9493.1991(05)
9493.1991(04)
9441.1992(33)
9443.1987(25)
9441.1994(31)
9432.1987(01)
9441.1984(20)
9441.1984(08)
9493.1986(03)
9444.1983(02)
9441.1994(17)
9496.1991(01)
9441.1988(07)
9444.1994 (07)
9441.1995(14)
9441.1986(48)
9503.52-1A
9503.51-1A
9527.1987(02)
04/02/86
06/05/91
08/04/95
06/30/95
01/27/87
02/05/91
05/22/87
06/24/87
03/27/89
12/07/88
10/14/90
08/23/85
11/25/85
04/06/88
04/26/89
02/02/95
02/19/84
02/22/85
09/30/86
05/22/86
03/08/91
03/30/87
02/11/86
01/24/86
04/09/86
04/26/84
08/12/87
09/24/84
08/30/84
02/13/85
10/11/91
10/11/91
10/08/92
11/04/87
12/20/94
03/17/87
08/16/84
05/03/84
08/21/86
07/11/83
06/10/94
08/05/91
03/10/88
09/19/94
04/12/95
06/10/86
01/02/86
12/24/85
08/03/87
-------
» : ! m
! i !
! I !
5! » !• *! -X il
P! IIIII 111 li
r! I: !£ '-- i M :§!& Pz^l ftriiTr:: ? ::
5j= ~ PC= -= = c^ (a£ =? = «*-""= i- H-jcgi i?-t-t is ^K«Mt«bi I 5i
j ; m sj1 m >!
II ?!
MI!
.07/02/96
r
KEYWORD JHOEX
-5 5 || (i ,»|,| [pn iipp ||p | i
B i ; ; | I
I SLUDGE DEHYDRATION EQUIPMENT AS AlWASTEHATER TREATMENTlUNJT
; SLUDGE JDRYER AODED| TO HASTEHATER TREATMENT UNIT-EFFECT ON' HHTO EXEMPTION
SLUDGEI DRYERS f " I
I:(See Sludge) j
SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR - -
(See Generators) , . :
SMELTING WASTE : E
(See Hazardous Waste Identification)
SOIL ! '
(See Hazardous Waste Identification)
SOLE ACTIVE INGREDIENT . ; ,
(See Listed Hazardous Haste) ; ! ;
SOLID WASTE : > ;
(See also Recycle, Hazardous Waste Identification) ;
*DEFINITION OF SOLID WASTE AND RECLAMATION J
*SOLID WASTE DETERMINATION :
*SPECULATIVE ACCUMULATION CALCULATION !
ACTIVATED CARBON CANISTERS SATURATED WITH SPENT SOLVENTS
ANTARCTICA WASTE DISPOSAL PRACTICES
BAGHOUSE DUSTS USED AS, OR TO PRODUCE, AGGREGATE
BERYLLIUM WASTE DUST
BUBBLER CANISTERS CONTAINING PHOSPHOROUS OXYCHLORIDE ARE NOT HASTE WHEN RETURNED TO THE UNITED STATES* FROMs-JAPAN
CARBON REGENERATION FACILITY, MIXTURE OF SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTES (CALGON) i
CHARACTERISTIC SLUDGES RECLAIMED OR PROCESSED PRIOR TO USE AS AN INGREDIENT IN FERTILIZER
COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS, RECYCLING A MIXTURE OF
COPPER PLATING SOLUTION
COPPER PLATING SOLUTION REACTED WITH A CHELATING AGENT TO PRODUCE A COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER
DEIONIZATION ACID REUSED, NOT A WASTE
DETONATING EXPLOSIVE WASTES
DOD MUNITIONS BECOME SOLID WASTE SUBJECT TO RCRA WHEN THERE IS AN INTENT TO DISPOSE OR DESTROY THEM
EXPORTATION OF MUNICIPAL WASTE TO CENTRAL AMERICA ;
FILTER PRESS PROPOSED AS PART OF CORRECTIVE ACTION - NOT EXCLUDED FROM PERMITTING !
GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATED WITH HAZARDOUS WASTE LEACHATE
HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL CADENCE PRODUCT 312, REGULATION OF I
LEAKS, SPILLS, AND ILLEGAL DISCHARGES OF LISTED WASTES TO SURFACE WATERS, MIXTURE RULE APPLIED TO
LETTER TO STATE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSIONERS: SUBTITLE D STATE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANS
MERCURY SUITABLE FOR DIRECT USE (99% PURE) NOT SOLID WASTE
MERCURY THERMOMETERS, RECLAIMED OFF-SPEC AND BROKEN
MERCURY, REFINING/REUSE OF SCRAP
MICRO-CLEAR REGULATORY STATUS :
MIXTURE OF F003 AND A SOLID WASTE AND DELISTING REQUIREMENTS >
MIXTURES OF SOLID WASTE AND A WASTE LISTED SOLELY BECAUSE IT EXHIBITS A CHARACTERISTIC i
MUNICIPAL WASTE COMBUSTION RESIDUES-ASH AND SLUDGE !
OK^SPECIFICATION JET FUEL BURNED AS KEROSENE FUEL
^^KE RECYCLING OF SPENT SOLVENTS BY GENERATORS
^ * V; " J- i;;'".-;'-€ ^9432.1987 f08;)S: 08/03/87
-J: ' ':"___ 9432.1386 (OlJ)" 01/06/86
: i II !
25 IB E: JffiCaB' „„
a! i iij li
: MB:
' "' "<:* "^ '; '
_3 JJ ; 4j jj i j
• , , -;•_ i.- 1; •
- i J f; fy hy :
l:' •" >f* li* L
:;?»;»: ttsa
TES*FROMeJAPAN:
j *• |]
~- ji I
3 >t ;
^ i i
£ 5 :P
\~:'''~-~*f ""?^C 9444
J>2^i9441
:>A Kfftt' niSit iiWl:J;*i9442
d,^B; ;x" ; ^^2:9493
M=->rfJ Jir- 5:^^^9434
FOR:iREGENERATION^';;9456
:1 !
" ; •"'119493
^=3 94 41
Jr(9443
»i4Ji9493
,i : 3fflj:9441
!e HT3?9443
.1987(373)
.1985(19a)
.1992(04)
.1986(54)
.1989(04)
.1991(03)
.1989(01)
.1994(01)
.1986(33)
.1985(03)
.1986(34)
.1986(04)
.1986(01)
,1986,(39) _
.1987(30)
M 5 ; .; WJ9441. 1985(31)
a s
i: :: e
f if ^
i; : j
-
* t ;
t A 1^
i » i
i i il
^ I IS
i «W9573
i ^9433
,^9441
*S9494
«3l9441
"9572
*:»59441
J ^9441
_=9441
1 JW9444
!; : fl99441
'^ i SU9441
:l i
' 1X9441
:» ;
.1990(01)
.1987(10)
.1986(83)-:
.1986(04)
.1986(07)
.00-02
.1986(43)
.1986(27)
.1986(06)
.1990(02)
.1987(65)
.1985(38)
.1986(13)
.1986(13"
.1986^^
08/31/8,7
05/31/85:
02/28/92; i
07/15/86 i
04/26/89 i
06/21/91 ,
03/17/89 '
12/16/94 f
04/23/86 1
11/25/85 !
04/28/86
01/22/86 ?
01/22/86
05/12/86 i_
11/30/87 '
10/03/85 i
02/16/90
06/12/87 !
11/13/86
04/11/86 1
01/23/86 ;
02/22/88
05/30/86
04/02/86
01/21/86
03/22/90
08/17/87 !
11/20/85 -
05/27/86 1
03/08/86
03/13/86 I
ij
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 133
RECLAIMED METHANOL IS A PRODUCT RATHER THAN A WASTE
RECYCLED CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE SLUDGES
RECYCLED GASOLINE/WATER AND FUEL OIL/WATER MIXTURES
REFRACTORY WASTES AT U.S. EPA COMBUSTION RESEARCH FACILITY
SILVER RECOVERY IN THE PHOTOGRAPHIC INDUSTRY, CHEMICAL RECOVERY CARTRIDGES FOR
SPENT AND RECLAIMED SOLVENTS, BLENDING OF RECLAIMED XYLENE
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR, REUSE OF
SPENT SULFURIC ACID PICKLE LIQUOR USED TO PRODUCE FERTILIZER
STATUS OF UNLISTED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS WHEN RECYCLED
WOOD TREATMENT CYLINDER CREOSOTE SUMPS
Batteries
*BATTERY REGENERATION
*EXPORTING HAZARDOUS WASTE
*LEAD-ACID BATTERIES AND UNIVERSAL WASTE
*REGENERATION VERSUS RECLAMATION FOR SPENT LEAD-ACID BATTERIES
*REGULATION OF NICKEL/CADMIUM BATTERIES AS SCRAP METAL WHEN RECYCLED
*SPENT LEAD ACID BATTERIES
*SPENT LEAD-ACID BATTERIES AND COUNTING REQUIREMENTS
AIDS TO NAVIGATION (ATON) BATTERIES AND RCRA REQUIREMENTS
ATON BATTERIES, GENERATOR DEFINITION FOR
BATTERIES, SCRAP METAL, AND PRECIOUS METALS
BATTERIES, WASTE ELECTROLYTE FROM RECHARGEABLE NICKEL-CADMIUM
BATTERY RECONDITIONING
BATTERY RECYCLING AND EXPORT
GENERATION OF AIDS TO NAVIGATION (ATON BATTERIES)
HOUSEHOLD WASTES - DISPOSAL OF CARBON-ZINC BATTERIES
LITHIUM BATTERIES
MANAGEMENT OF LEAD-ACID BATTERIES THAT ARE RECYCLED
' MERCURY DRY CELL BATTERIES AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
NICKEL-CADMIUM BATTERIES RECYCLING
NICKLE/CADMIUM BATTERIES, REGULATORY STATUS
REACTIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF DISCHARGED Li/502 BATTERIES
RECYCLED PRECIOUS METALS, BATTERIES FROM DEFENSE DEPT. SUPPLIES
RECYCLING OF LEAD-ACID BATTERIES
REGENERATION OF USED BATTERIES EXEMPTED FROM REGULATION
REGULATORY STATUS OF BATTERIES
REGULATORY STATUS OF BATTERY CARCASSES
REGULATORY STATUS OF MERCURY BATTERIES
REGULATORY STATUS OF PLASTIC CHIPS FROM RECLAMATION OF LEAD-ACID BATTERIES
REGULATORY STATUS OF USED NICKEL-CADMIUM BATTERIES
REPROCESSING OF BATTERIES
REUSE/RECYCLE REGULATIONS IMPACT ON SPENT LEAD-ACID BATTERY RECYCLING
SCRAP METAL REMOVED FROM SPENT ALKALINE BATTERIES THAT ARE RECYCLED
SPECIAL MATERIALS DISPOSED OF IN LANDFILLS: BATTERIES, CAPACITORS, LAB PACKS
SPENT LEAD-ACID BATTERIES BEING RECLAIMED
SPENT LEAD-ACID BATTERIES MANAGEMENT
WASTE BATTERIES AND CELLS
By-Product
"•CLARIFICATION OF BY-PRODUCT VERSUS SCRAP METAL . •. • j
BRASS DROSS SKIMMINGS, SEPARATION OF METALS AND OXIDES, BY-PRODUCT |
BY-PRODUCT CRUDE OIL TANK BOTTOMS , : . j
SFICA™NEASATO SHM^FIXBR is A -BY-PRODUCT- AND NOT SUBJECT TO THE DEFINITION OF SOLID WASTE WHEN BEING RECLAIMED
CLARIFICATION OF RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE REGULATIONS AS THEY APPLY TO CERTAIN SECONDARY MATERIALS • j
cSlCATION ON: MANIFEST DOCUMENT NUMBER; F003, F005, D001; WASTE DESTINED FOR RECYCLING; AND TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR CFC;
9441.1985(33) 10/23/85
9441.1985(39) 11/25/85
9441.1986(22) 03/19/86
9444.1988(05) 03/11/88
9443.1987(01) 01/06/87
9441.1987(24) 04/15/87
9441.1987(17) 03/31/87
9493.1985(02-)
9444.1993(01)
9502.1986(15)
9441.1985(30a)
9456.1987(01)
9593.1995(01)
9497.1994(01)
9441.1990(13d)
9497.1989(01)
9497.1995(01) :
9451.1987(03) '
9453.1988(03) i
9441.1985(44) j
9441.1985(13) j
9441.1986(56) !
9497.1987(01) j
9461.1987(03) ,
9441.1984(07) j
9443.1987(02) j
11/14/85
02/23/93
09/12/86 .
09/30/85
08/30/87
12/31/95
11/30/94
05/31/90
01/31/89
06/30/95
07/30/87
02/25/88
12/18/85
05/15/85
07/29/86.
02/12/87
07/30/87
04/19/84
01/14/87
9497.1993(01) 112/23/93
9443.1986(18) i
9497.1991(02) i
9441.1990(13) i
9443.1987(05) |
9441.1986(85)
9497.1989(03) i
9441.1986(51) ,
9441.1993(24) : :
9441.1993(23)
9443.1994(02)
9441.1993(13)
9441.1993(20)
9497.1987(02)
9497.1986(01) =
09/04/86
05/30/91
05/23/90
03/18/87
11/19/86
11/17/89
07/02/86
12/22/93
11/10/93
02/04/94
08/04/93
10/22/93
02/19/87
02/06/86
9441.1986(79) . j 10/20/86
9487.1986(13)
9497.1987(03)
9497.1989(02)
9443.1983(05)
: - .. ._
9441.1990(09a)
12/31/86
04/17/87
10/19/89
07/27/83
03/31/90
9441.1985(21) i 06/06/85
'9441.1986(37) J05/01/86
9432.1986(10)
9441.1995(27)
9441.1994(13)
9441.1994(26)
04/12/86
08/16/95
05/19/94
09/28/94
-------
1 I
MB ijji BBI ! II I|l|
i07/02/96
KEYWORD 1CDEX
I III
—4--
•1 I
1
=' 1 i1 5
II III !
i jii. 1
COPPER-BBARIMO SECONDARY MATERIALS AS FEEDSTOCK ! !
DISTILLATION OR PRACTIOHATIOH COLUMN BOTTOMS PROM THE PRODUCTION OF CHLOROBBHZENE i
DROSS FROM ALUMINUM SMELTING USED IN MANUFACTURE OP CEMENT
DROVE RECLAMATION IH BRASS INDUSTRY, BY-PRODUCT DESIGNATION ' :
HAZARDOUS HASTE DETERMINATION OF "NICKEL MATTE" BY-PRODUCT ! I
METAL GALVANIZING PROCESS RESIDUES AS BY-PRODUCTS/SECONDARY 'MATERIALS ! !
ON-SITE INCINERATION OF A HASTE THAT IS BOTH A BY-PRODUCT MATERIAL AND!HAZARDOUS _ . _. .,„. ^._
I REGULATORY STATUS OF COAL TAR DISTILLATES I i II
' REGULATORY STATUS OF DISULFIDE OIL WHICH IS BURNED IN A SULFURIC ACID FURNACE : '' " " " "~ ""' — ~ ' ' "
REGULATORY STATUS OF DRIP GAS GENERATED ALONG NATURAL GAS TRANSMISSION PIPELINES :
REGULATORY STATUS OF HAZARDOUS HASTE FUELS CONTAINING RECOVERED LIGHT HYDROCARBON ;
REGULATORY STATUS OF PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS : -.-_-_ ,f „ s . . > =. , ^
REGULATORY STATUS OF SEPARATION AND RECOVERY SYSTEMS SARBX PROCESS FOR RECYCLING PETROLEUM (REFINERY! OflJYI BASTES! jj)
REGULATORY STATUS OF SOLDER SKIMMINGS j i ! i: (i ! g ji! f i--i
SOLDER DROSS FROM SKIMMING MOLTEN SOLDER BATHS - REGULATORY STATUS ! i i h i ! ;K iH l: i,i
SOLDER SKIMMINGS REGULATORY INTERPRETATION - i ! I !! i: «-3 Mi l< !:!
, THE REGULATORY STATUS OF A DISTILLATE MATERIAL KNOWN AS "LX-830" THAT IS DERIVED FROM PETROLEUM ANDJCOALITAR NAPHTHA FEEDSTOCKS
! THERMAL OXIDATION UNIT/FUME INCINERATOR AND CYANURIC CHLORIDE WASTE | j
L THERMAL OXIDIZER AND HYDRODECHLORINATION PROCESS BY-PRODUCT K-WASTES
«; !,)
Definition ; -
i*BDAT FOR WASTEWATER ; ;
i*DEFINITION OF SOLID WASTE ~
!*ELECTROPLATING AND ELECTROLESS PLATING LISTINGS 1 I
;*HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE ' 5
!*SKINNER LIST i
;*SLUDGES WHEN RECLAIMED, REGULATION OF ; :
i*SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE, DEFINED FOR SPENT SULFURIC ACID \ j
*TANK WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT DEFINITIONS i l
;*USED OIL, DEFINITION OF . :
!*WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT DEFINITION I I
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA REGULATIONS REGARDING LARGE QUANTITY GENERATORS, TO THE VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA SUBTITLE C REGULATIONS TO SILVER RECLAMATION OPERATIONS OF SPENT PHOTOGRAPHIC FIXER SOLUTIONS
'AQUEOUS AS USED IN THE CORROSIVITY CHARACTERISTIC
JBAGHOUSE FLUE DUST AND ZINC OXIDE SLUDGE USED IN ZINC CHEMICALS PRODUCTION
•BATCH, DEFINITION OF
[BOILERS USED IN GREENHOUSE OPERATIONS ARE INDUSTRIAL BOILERS
'CLARIFICATION OF HOW RCRA REGULATIONS APPLY TO OFF-SPECIFICATION FUELS THAT ARE BEING BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
CLARIFICATION ON RCRA AND TSCA JURISDICTION OVER INFECTIOUS AND/OR GENETICALLY ENGINEERED WASTE
'CLARIFICATION: IS A FACILITY THAT HAS A "PRIMARY PURPOSE" OF BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FOR DESTRUCTION SUBJECT TO RCRA REGULATIONS?
iCOLORED GLAZE SOLIDS COLLECTED IN POTTERY MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS
... ^DETERMINATION ON WHETHER A GENERATOR'S FLUORESCENT TUBES ARE NONHAZARDOUS _. .
[GENERATOR WITH RESPECT TO REGULATION OF OPERATIONAL WASTES FROM SHIPS, DEFINITION
IHEAT RECOVERY UNIT AS A BOILER OR AN INCINERATOR
'HOLDING, TEMPORARY, PERIOD, STORAGE, AND DISPOSAL (DEFINITIONS)
llGNITABLE SOLID DEFINITION APPLIED TO TITANIUM SWARF
! INTEGRAL DESIGN STANDARD IN BOILER DEFINITION (LUBRIZOL)
I INTERPRETATION OF INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER DISCHARGE EXCLUSION FROM THE DEFINITION OF SOLID WASTE
!IS SCRUBBER WASTE FROM A SCRUBBER IN A CLOSED-LOOP FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION CONSIDERED A SOLID WASTE?
;LEAD SHEILDING FOR RADIOACTIVE WASTE IS A RCRA SOLID WASTE
iMARINE DEBRIS IN WATERS, DISPOSAL OF
[MATERIALS USED IN FERTILIZER PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT
.MATERIALS USED IN FERTILIZER PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT
IMETHANOL RECOVERY SYSTEM - CLARIFICATION OF WASTE STATUS
[PIPELINE TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
PROCESSING LEAD ABATEMENT DEBRIS TO MEET HAZARDOUS WASTE RECYCLER'S SPECIFICATIONS IS NOT "TREATMENT" AS DEFINED IN 40 CFR 260.10:
RECYCLING EXCLUSION OF WASTES
Page Ko. 124
9441.1988(08)
9441.1988 (Ui)
9*41..1989 (01!)
94431.1989(15;)
9441.1994(32)
944:i! .1989 (14')
9432.1986(14)
944;i.1992 (20)
94411.1993(10)
9444.1993(03)
944|2.1993(03)
9441.1992(27)
9432.19'93(01)
94411.1992 (28)
9441.1991(03)
9441.1991(10)
944:1.1995(02)
948'8.1986(06)
9444.1987(44)
03/22/88
04/21/88
02/07/89
04/05/89
12/23/94
04/02/89
09/06/86
07/09/92
06/02/93
09/09/93
11/04/93
08/26/92
03/05/93
08/28/92
03/19/91
06/21/91
01/31/95
04/30/86
10/16/87
9432.1986(16)
9441.1987(40)
9432.1989(01)
9441.1988(30)
9445.1985(06)
9441.1986(59)
9441.1986(17)
9432.1988(03) '
9431.1988(01)
9432.1988(05)
9441.1994(30) '
9496.1994(01)
9443.1987(19)
9441.1985(06)
9432.1989(05)
9432.1986(03)
9441.1994(18)
9441.1995(06)
9498.1994(07)
9441.1988(17)
9441.1995(23)
9432/1986(05) :
9432.1985(08)
9432,1986(12)
9443.1983(01)
9432.;i985(10)
9441.1995(05)
9441,1995(14)
9444.1991(02)
9432.1987(123)
9493.1991(04)
9493.1991(05)
9441.1987(46)
9432.1986(08)
9432.1994(03)
9441.1990(06) :
12/30/86
05/31/87
08/30/89
06/30/88
08/30/85
06/30/86
02/28/86
03/30/88
01/30/88
10/30/88
11/23/94
02/28/94
09/14/87
02/13/85
12/05/89
01/09/86
07/11/94
02/21/95
07/21/94
05/18/88
06/22/95
02/05/86
11/20/85
07/28/86
01/10/83
12/30/85
02/17/95
04/12/95
04/30/91
11/04/87
10/11/91
10/11/91
06/17/87
04/30/86
10/07/94
03/19/90
-------
OV/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 125
REGULATORY STATUS AND MANAGEMENT OF LIQUIDS AND ABSORBENT MATERIALS CONTAINING "QUIDS . DPTDm PIIM mKPR
REGULATORY STATUS OF A DISSOLVED AIR FLOATATION FLOAT STORAGE TANK USED TO FEED MATERIAL INTO A PETROLEUM COKER
REGULATORY STATUS OF ACRYLIC PLASTIC DUST
REGULATORY STATUS OF NATURAL GAS REGULATORS THAT CONTAIN MERCURY UNDER RCRA
SLUDGE DRYER ADDED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT-EFFECT ON WWTU EXEMPTION
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNIT FOR THE PURPOSE OF CORRECTIVE ACTION UNDER 3004 (u) , DEFINITION OF
SPENT SULFURIC ACID ACCUMULATED SPECULATIVELY
STILL BOTTOM WASTE GENERATED BY A POLYSTYRENE PRODUCTION FACILITY
THREE AND FOUR-SIDED, FLOORED STRUCTURES, REGULATORY CLASSIFICATION OF
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION APPLICABILITY TO A BAGHOUSE SYSTEM
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION APPLICABILITY TO A BAGHOUSE SYSTEM
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION FOR SCRAP METAL RECYCLER
UCAPCO APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE UNDER 3004 (c) (2) OF RCRA
VARIANCES FROM CLASSIFICATION AS A SOLID WASTE UNDER 40 CFR 260. 31 (b) FOR SPENT CATALYSTS
WOOD TREATMENT CYLINDER CREOSOTE SUMPS
ZINC OXIDE DUST RECLAIMED OR USED AS FERTILIZER
Discarded Materials
*ISOMERS OF P- AND U-LISTED WASTES
AS IT RELATES TO THE LATEX PROCESS WASTES GENERATED BY A COMPANY
CLARIFICATION OF DISCARDED AMMUNITION OF 0.50 CALIBER
FORMALDEHYDE-BASED TOILET DEODORANTS
IRON AND STEEL SLAGS, REGULATORY STATUS
IS SCRUBBER WASTE FROM A SCRUBBER IN A CLOSED-LOOP FLUE GAS DESULFURIZATION CONSIDERED A SOLID WASTE?
SALE AND SCRAPPING OF DOT'S MARITIME OBSOLETE VESSELS FROM THE NATIONAL DEFENSE RESERVE FLEET
SOIL CONTAMINATED WITH CHLORDANE AS A RESULT OF PESTICIDE APPLICATION
SPENT CARBON REGULATION
THERMAL OXIDIZER AND HYDRODECHLORINATION PROCESS BY-PRODUCT K-WASTES
Household Wastes
*HOTEL DRY CLEANING WASTE AND THE HOUSEHOLD WASTE EXCLUSIONS
•HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE
"HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE EXCLUSION GENERATED BY CONTRACTORS
*MEDICAL WASTE - HOUSEHOLD MEDICAL WASTE
"RESTAURANT WASTE AND THE HOUSEHOLD WASTE EXCLUSION
*WASTE CLASSIFICATION
*WASTE DERIVED FROM TREATING EXEMPT OR EXCLUDED WASTES
APPLICABILITY OF THE HOUSEHOLD WASTE EXCLUSION TO LEAD-CONTAMINATED SOIL
CALIFORNIA LIST HOC LAND BAN REGULATIONS
CHEMICAL WEAPON AGENT REALEASE
DO RCRA REQUIREMENTS APPLY TO THE HANDLING, SHIPMENT AND DISPOSAL OF HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCE COMPONENTS?
DRY CLEANING AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES WASTE NOT EXCLUDED AS HOUSEHOLD WASTE
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION PROGRAMS, CERCLA AND RCRA LIABILITY OF MUNICIPAL SPONSORS OF
HOUSEHOLD WASTE EXCLUSION SCOPE
HOUSEHOLD WASTES - DISPOSAL OF CARBON- ZINC BATTERIES
LEAD-BASED PAINT RESIDUES AND CONTAMINATED SOILS
MERCURY DRY CELL BATTERIES AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS
REGULATORY STATUS OF USED RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL/ INDUSTRIAL AEROSOL CANS
RESIDUES FROM U.S. NAVY SALVAGE FUEL BOILER
STATUS OF WASTES GENERATED FROM ABATEMENT OF LEAD-BASED PAINT
USED CRANKCASE OIL DISPOSED OF BY DO-IT-YOURSELFERS
Regulated Wastes
*SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS
APPLICABILITY OF MINING WASTE EXCLUSION TO WASTED LIME KILN REFRACTORY BRICKS
CLARIFICATION OF CERTAIN ISSUES REGARDING OIL AND GAS WASTES
9551.1993(04)
9441.1993(21)
9441.1995(03)
9442.1994(06)
9432.1986(01)
9502.00-6
9441.1988(19)
9432.1988(01)
9432.1987(02)
9432.1986(15)
9432.1987(01)
9432.00-1
9480.1987(02)
9433.1994(02)
9441.1986(69)
9441.1987(61)
9444.1995(02)
9441.1985(25)
9441.1995(28)
9443.1994(06)
9441.1986(38)
9571.1990(04)
9441.1995(14)
9441.1994(21)
9444.1986(20)
9441.1987(37)
9444.1987(44)
9441.1995(13)
1.9441.1988(30)
9441.1990(09)
9441.1989(24)
9441.1995(19)
9441.1987(99)
9441.1987(31)
9441.1995(08)
9554.1989(04)
9441.1990(12)
9441.1995(07)
9441.1986(32)
9441.1986(09)
9574.1991(01)
9441.1984(07)
9443.1987(28)
9443.1986(18)
9442.1993(02)
9441.1987(16)
9443.1994(03)
9441.1987(64)
9444.1986(14)
9441.1994(11)
9571.1993(02)
11/17/93
11/01/93
02/02/95
07/29/94
01/06/86
07/02/87 .
05/26/88
02/11/88
04/02/87
12/22/86
03/17/87
02/11/86
10/29/87
11/15/94
09/12/86
08/12/87
09/30/95
07/01/85
08/24/95
11/03/94
05/01/86 '
05/30/90
04/12/95
08/05/94
09/29/86
05/18/87
10/16/87;
03/31/95
06/30/88
03/30/90
08/16/89
05/31/95
12/31/87
04/30/87
03/07/95
11/28/89
05/09/90
02/28/95
04/21/86
01/28/86
05/30/91
04/19/84
11/20/87
09/04/86
10/07/93
03/17/67
05/24/94
08/13/87
06/30/86
05/11/54
11/05/93
-------
ii
07/02/96
MI I
ii
I I
1 i
« »—• =-
1 III
I K S
I I
KEYWORD :1»EX
I!
. 126
II
ri
!
- DREDGE SEDIMENTS
I !
| STORAGE FACILITIES, JRCRA APPLICABILITY TO | ! - _^ = |H a
Scrap Metal i ! : ^ _ , _~ ^
•PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY OF SPECULATIVE ACCUMULATION PROVISION «
APPLICABILITY OF F006 HAZARDOUS HASTE CODE TO NICKEL RECLAMATION PROCESS FOR ELECTROLESS NICKEL PLATING SPENT SOLUTIONS»
ASBESTOS/LEAD/SOIL/DEBRIS AS INORGANIC SOLID DEBRIS _
BATTERIES, SCRAP METAL, AND PRECIOUS METALS •
CLARIFICATION ON: MANIFEST DOCUMENT NUMBER; F003, FOOS, D001; HASTE DESTINED FOR RECYCLING; AND -TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR.CFC
DROVE RECLAMATION IN BRASS INDUSTRY, BY-PRODUCT DESIGNATION
HAZARDOUS WASTES THAT ARE RECYCLED, HANDLING
RECLAIMING PRECIOUS METALS FROM DISCARDED AUTOMOTIVE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES
REGULATORY DETERMINATION OF SPENT SOLDER BATHS, ALSO KNOWN AS "POT DUMPS"
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR ON-SITE TREATMENT OF OXYGEN BREATHING APPARATUS
REGULATORY STATUS OF BRASS PARTICLES GENERATED IN THE BELTING AND BUFFING OF
(DBA) CANISTERS
BRASS CASTINGS
I
1
i REGULATORY STATUS OP NATURAL GAS REGULATORS THAT CONTAIN MERCURY UNDER RCRA
i REGULATORY STATUS OF PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS
: REGULATORY STATUS OF SPENT PHOTOCONDUCTOR DRUMS FROM PHOTOCOPYING MACHINES
: REGULATORY STATUS OF SPENT SOLDER BATHS, ALSO KNOWN AS "POT DUMPS"
• REGULATORY STATUS OF USED RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL AEROSOL CANS
SALE AND SCRAPPING OF DOT'S MARITIME OBSOLETE VESSELS FROM THE NATIONAL DEFENSE RESERVE FLEET
: SCRAP METAL REMOVED FROM SPENT ALKALINE BATTERIES THAT ARE RECYCLED
THE STATUS OF UNUSED OFF-SPECIFICATION LEAD PLATES USED IN THE PRODUCTION OF LEAD-ACID AUTOMOTIVE BATTERIES
! TORPEDO PROPULSION UNITS SHIPPED FOR RECYCLING, REGULATION OF
! TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION FOR SCRAP METAL RECYCLER
USED OIL FILTERS - REGULATION
i USED OIL FILTERS, REGULATORY DETERMINATION
Secondary Materials
*CLOSED LOOP RECYCLING
*PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY OF SPECULATIVE ACCUMULATION PROVISION
*SECONDARY MATERIALS USED AS EFFECTIVE SUBSTITUTES FOR COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS
ACCUMULATION OF SECONDARY MATERIAL - ABANDONED VS. DISPOSED OF
BRIQUETTING OF FLUE DUST (K061) FOR STEEL PRODUCTION
CLARIFICATION OF RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE REGULATIONS AS THEY APPLY TO CERTAIN SECONDARY MATERIALS
CLARIFICATION ON HOW REUSE OF "WASTE RESINS" AS FEED STOCK TO MANUFACTURE NEW PRODUCTS ARE REGULATED UNDER RCRA ; 3
CLARIFICATION ON WHEN USED MERCURY RELAYS/SWITCHES BECOME SPENT i I
CLARIFICATION ON: MANIFEST DOCUMENT NUMBER; F003, FOOS, D001; WASTE DESTINED FOR RECYCLING; AND TREATMENT STANDARDS IFORKFC
COPPER-BEARING SECONDARY MATERIALS AS FEEDSTOCK ] ;
DISTILLATION OR FRACTIONATION COLUMN BOTTOMS FROM THE PRODUCTION OF CHLOROBENZENE
EXCLUSION FROM RCRA REGULATION FOR SECONDARY MATERIALS USED OR REUSED DIRECTLY AS INGREDIENTS IN AN INDUSTRIAL PROCESS 1
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS APPLIED TO EXPORTED WASTES J
LUBRICATING OIL AND JET FUELS USED TO PRODUCE PETROLEUM PRODUCTS • f
METAL GALVANIZING PROCESS RESIDUES AS BY-PRODUCTS/SECONDARY MATERIALS ~
RECYCLING OF ELECTROPLATING SLUDGES (FOOS) FOR CEMENT/AGGREGATE MANUFACTURE J
REGULATORY DETERMINATION ON THE STATUS OF A LEAD/COPPER METAL PRODUCED BY METALS RECYCLING TECHNOLOGIES (MRT) "
REGULATORY STATUS OF AN AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DUST THAT IS FED TO AN ELECTROLYTIC METALS RECOVERY PROCESS TO RECOVER ZINC METAL
REGULATORY STATUS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE FUELS CONTAINING RECOVERED LIGHT HYDROCARBON
REGULATORY STATUS OF SEPARATION AND RECOVERY SYSTEMS SAREX PROCESS FOR RECYCLING PETROLEUM REFINERY OILY WASTES
REGULATORY STATUS OF SPENT PHOTOCONDUCTOR DRUMS FROM PHOTOCOPYING MACHINES
RETURNED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS
SECONDARY MATERIAL SUBJECTED TO NOTICE REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE US-CANADIAN BILATERAL TREATY
SECONDARY MATERIALS RECYCLED IN PHOSPHORIC ACID RECIRCULATING SYSTEMS
SECONDARY MATERIALS REGULATION - USED SULFURIC ACID . '
SPENT FOUNDRY SANDS USED AS MOLDS IN THE CASTING PROCESS
VARIANCES FROM CLASSIFICATION AS A SOLID WASTE UNDER 40 CFR 260.31(D> FOR SPENT CATALYSTS
9443.1989(08)1
;9432. 1983 (02)|
= B
•
19441,1995(29)1
=9444. 1994 (08)«>
9551.1990(14)1
19441.1985(44)1
9441.1994(26) =
=9441.1989(15)1
=9441.1i986(76H
=9432.1989(03)3
9441. 1(993 (17)1
=9441.1)994(10)1
=9441.1)993(15)1
9442. l!994 (06T
19441. l)992 (27)f
9441.^992(39)
9441.1)993(18)^
9442.1)993(02) =
9441. 1)994 (21) =
=9441.1986(79)
9441. 1995 (31)E
=9441. l!986 (14)1
E9432.00-1 =
,9441.1990(30)
9442.1990(05)
^9471.1988(06)5
=9441.1995(29)8
=9441.1992(13)1
^9441.1985(25)1
.9441.1987(58)8
=9441.1994(13)=
=9441.1994(19)1
•9441.1994(25)1
=9441.1994(26)1
9441.1988(08)1
=94'41. 1988 (11)1
B9 4:98 .1994 (06)1
^9551.-199i:(07)M
=9494.1985(01)1
9441.1989(14)1
^9441.1989(19)8
9441.1994(23)1
9441.1994(31)8
19442.1993(03)1
=9432.1993(01)=]
9441. 1992 (39)S
9455.1991(02)3
=9441.1989(29)B
:9571. 1990(05)1
19441.1988(23)1
=9441.1995(22)1
19433.1994(02)1
08/11/89
11/29/83
08/31/95
09/21/94
12/11/90
12/18/85
09/28/94
04/05/89
10/08/86
06/06/89
09/20/93
05/09/94
09/14/93
07/29/94
OB/26/92
11/10/92
09/24/93
10/07/93
08/05/94
10/20/86
09/14/95
02/25/86
02/11/86
10/30/90
10/30/90
12/30/88
08/31/95
05/31/92
07/01/85
07/31/87
05/19/94
07/11/94
09/28/94
09/28/94
03/22/88
04/21/88
07/20/94
-04/23/91
10/01/85
04/02/89
04/26/89
08/19/94
12/20/94
11/04/93
03/05/93
11/10/92
05/16/91
06/15/89
06/27/90
06/06/88
06/19/95
11/15/94
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 127
Spent Materials
•CONTAMINATED SOLDER AS SPENT MATERIAL
"HAZARDOUS WASTE IDENTIFICATION
•LEAD-ACID BATTERIES AND UNIVERSAL WASTE
*SPENT LEAD-ACID BATTERIES AND COUNTING REQUIREMENTS
*SPENT SOLVENTS FROM VARNISH STRIPPING
TO SILVER RECLAMATION OPERATIONS OF SPENT PHOTOGRAPHIC FIXER SOLUTIONS
CARBON REGENERATION FACILITIES
CARBON REGENERATION FACILITIES
™°ICA??ON^f TORwSETHERGUSED FIXER IS A "BY-PRODUCT" AND NOT SUBJECT TO THE DEFINITION OF SOLID WASTE WHEN BEING RECLAIMED
CLARIFICATION OF RCRA REGULATIONS AS THEY APPLY TO THE USE OF PERCHLOROETHYLENE IN DRY-CLEANING PROCESS
CLARIFICATION OF THE DEFINITION OF "SPENT MATERIAL" AS IT APPLIES TO A MERCURIC CHLORIDE CATALYST
CLARIFICATION OF WHEN A SECONDARY MATERIAL MEETS THE DEFINITION OF "SPENT MATERIAL"
CLARIFICATION ON WHEN USED MERCURY RELAYS/SWITCHES BECOME SPENT
DETERMINATION ON WHETHER A GENERATOR'S FLUORESCENT TUBES ARE NONHAZARDOUS
ETCHANTS USED TO MANUFACTURE COPPER SALTS
FREE-FLOWING MERCURY WHICH IS DISTILLED AND SOLD AS AN INGREDIENT IN AN INDUSTRIAL PROCESS
INDUSTRIAL PLATING OPERATIONS, STATUS OF VARIOUS WASTES FROM
INTERPRETATION ON REGULATORY STATUS OF MERCURY RELAYS AND SWITCHES WHEN RECLAIMED
IS THE CHEMICAL POTASSIUM HEXACYANOCOBALT (II) -FERRATE (II), USED AT A DOE NUCLEAR PLANT, CONSIDERED A "MIXED WASTE" UNDER RCRA?
NICKLE/CADMIUM BATTERIES, REGULATORY STATUS
PHOTOGRAPHIC FIXER RECYCLING
PLASTIC PACKING MEDIA FROM AIR STRIPPING TOWER TREATING CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER
POSITION PAPER ON SPENT ABSORBENT MATERIALS
"TORY ™ OF HIGH"™ SEGAL'S THAT ARE INITIALLY USED BY CUSTOMERS AND THEN SOLD TO OTHER BUSINESSES FOR FURTHER USE
REGULATORY STATUS OF METAL CASINGS CONTAINING SPENT POWDERED METALLIC OXIDE CATALYST
REGULATORY STATUS OF SOLDER SCRAP
REGULATORY STATUS OF SPENT FOUNDRY SAND UNDER RCRA
REGULATORY STATUS OF SPENT PHOTOCONDUCTOR DRUMS FROM PHOTOCOPYING MACHINES
REGULATORY STATUS OF USED NICKEL-CADMIUM BATTERIES
SECONDARY 'MATERIAL SUBJECTED TO NOTICE REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE US-CANADIAN BILATERAL TREATY
SOLDER DROSS GENERATED IN MANUFACTURING PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS
SPENT ACIDS AS WATER CONDITIONER
SPENT FOUNDRY SANDS USED AS MOLDS IN THE CASTING PROCESS
SPENT LEAD-ACID BATTERIES MANAGEMENT
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR USED/REUSED IS NOT SOLID WASTE
USE OF LEAD SHOT AT SHOOTING RANGES
USE OF LEAD SHOT AT SHOOTING RANGES
USED REFRIGERANTS UNDER 40 CFR 261.2
USED X-RAY FILM AS A SPENT MATERIAL - SILVER RECLAMATION
USED X-RAY FILMS
VARIANCES FROM CLASSIFICATION AS A SOLID WASTE UNDER 40 CFR 260. 31 (b) FOR SPENT CATALYSTS
Subtitle D
•SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE GRANTS FOR STATES
•SUBTITLE D SURVEY
APPLICABILITY OF THE HOUSEHOLD WASTE EXCLUSION TO LEAD-CONTAMINATED SOIL
LETTER TO STATE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSIONERS: SUBTITLE D STATE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANS
SSS&S "s™"^ WASTE COLLECTION PROGRAMS COLLECTING CESQG WASTE
9441.1987(66)
9441.1990(13c)
9593.1995(01)
9497.1995(01)
9441.1986(57)
9441.1986(96)
9496.1994(01)
9441.1986(26)
9442.1986(03)
9441.1988(32)
9441.1995(27)
9441.1994(15)
9441.1994(06)
9441.1994(07)
9441.1994(25)
9441.1995(23)
9441.1986(82)
9441.1994(08)
9441.1988(50)
9444.1994(03)
9441.1995(30)
9441.1990(13)
9496.1990(01)
9441.1989(17)
9441.1991(09)
9441.1995(03)
9441.1994(24)
9443.1994(01)
9441.1992(06)
9441.1995(10)
9441.1992(39)
9441.1993(20)
9441.1989(29)
9441.1991(18)
9441.1987(73)
9441.1995(22)
9497.1989(02)
9441.1986(61)
9441.1992(31)
9441.1992(02)
9441.1990(28)
9441.1986(42)
9443.1986(12)
9433.1994(02)
9581.1988(01)
9573.1987(01)
9441.1995(08)
9572.00-02
9441.1986(55)
9574.00-02
06/30/87
05/31/90
12/31/95-
06/30/95
05/30/86
12/30/86
02/28/94
04/02/86
04/02/86
07/21/88
08/16/95
06/10/94
03/24/94 .
03/24/94
09/28/94
06/22/95
11/08/86
03/30/94
12/07/88
03/31/94
09/13/95
05/23/90
07/16/90
04/14/89
06/21/91
02/02/95
08/30/94
01/03/94,fJS
03/26/92
03/08/95
11/10/92
10/22/93
06/15/89
12/09/91
08/31/87
06/19/95 .
10/19/89
08/18/86
09/24/92
01/15/92
10/18/90
05/20/86
05/23/86
11/15/94
11/01/88
03/30/87
03/07/95
02/22/88
07/16/86
07/22/92
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNIT (SWMUs)
(See Corrective .Action)
XREF
-------
: 07/02/96
Ilil I !
!!!(
1 I
Mil!
I
11
III
KEYWORD
IB! Ml [
SOLIDIFICATION !
., ! ; ifps
' (See Treatment)
SOLVENTS
= 1 'iz" ^S =^J^~ N
I
m ii
Reclamation, Recovery under Reclamation, Recycle)
'(See alisa Hated' Hazardous Haste, Hastewater, EjLecKjr'q
*BDAT FOR WASTEWATER
•HAZARDOUS HASTE DETERMINATION I ! [ • ,' ""'
*LAND DISPOSAL BAN OF SOLVENTS " i •' 'J i *
*LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - IV NATIONAL VARIANCE KSOLVENTSlii '.
•LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - SOLVENT AND ^lOXIN WASTES ^
*METHYL CHLOROFORM ft
*PARTS HASHING WITH MINERAL SPIRITS, SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS < - =
*SOLVENT DRIPPINGS FOR DECREASING OPERATIONS ' ":
*SOLVENT DRIPPINGS FROM DECREASING OPERATIONS ~ i
•SOLVENT MIXTURE RULE, THE : ' !
•SOLVENTS USED IN CLEANING, EXTRACTION, BENEFICIATION, AND PROCESSING MACHINERY
•VARIANCES TO BAN - EFFECTIVE DATES FOR SOLVENTS AND DIOXINS
•WASTES GENERATED IN PROCESS UNITS
•WASTEHATER TREATMENT SLUDGE FROM CHEMICAL ETCHING ^
•WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS J !
ACETONE AND METHANOL CONTAMINATED WASHWATERS J
ACTIVATED CARBON CANISTERS USED TO COLLECT SOLVENT VAPORS GENERATED DURING PAINT APPLICATION i
CAUSTIC RINSING METAL PARTS
CLEAN SOLVENT FROM RECYCLED SOLVENT-CONTAINING WASTE - STILL BOTTOMS
DELISTING OF WASTE GENERATED FROM ZINC PHOSPHATING ON CARBON STEEL
DRY CLEANING CARTRIDGE FILTERS, DISPOSAL OF
DRY TOLUENE AND CARBON TETRACHLORIDE, SAFE DISPOSAL OF - -
DRYCLEANING INDUSTRY WASTES !I
ELECTROCHEMICAL MACHINING WASTES AND THE SCOPE OF THE F006 LISTING
ELECTROPLATING RINSEWATERS 1 !
ELECTROPLATING RINSEWATERS NOT IN F007-009 LISTINGS
F SOLVENT WASTES
F003 10% RULE AND ASSOCIATED REGULATIONS
F005 LISTING FOR PYRIDINE STILL BOTTOMS ' !
F006 AND F019 ELECTROPLATING LISTINGS ' \
F006 LISTING AND DEFINITION OF CONVERSION COATING
F019 LISTING AND THE CONVERSION COATING PROCESS
FILTER CAKE WASTE CONTAINING SOLVENT USED TO SOLUBILIZE PRODUCT
HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL CADENCE PRODUCT 312, REGULATION OF ! «
IMMERSION PLATING WASTEWATERS-BRONZE PLATING . ;
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS ON THE METAL FINISHING INDUSTRY ! '
MECHANICAL PLATING WASTES IN THE F006 LISTING, NON-INCLUSION OF
MIXED SOLVENT WASTES
MIXTURE RULE CALCULATION - INCLUDING VOLATILIZED SOLVENT ;
MOBILE RECYCLING UNIT FOR REPROCESSING WASTE SOLVENTS : !
MOBILE SOLVENT RECYCLER, GENERATOR DETERMINATION FOR
PAINT FILTERS, USED
PAINT SPRAY BOOTH AIR FILTERS
PAINT WASTES AND THE SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS '•
PAINTING CONTRACTOR WASTES-SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR
PAINTS CONTAINING SOLVENTS ; \
PERMITTING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS AFFECTING COMPLIANCE WITH LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS i
PRE-COAT WASTE CONTAINING 2-ETHOXYETHANOL (EXTRUDING PROCESS WASTE) \
PROCESS WASTES CONTAINING INKS, PAINTS, AND ADHESIVES '
Page Ho. 128
XREF
XREF •
9432,1986(16)
9441.1985(12)
9551.1986(03)
9551.1987(24)
9553.1988(01)
9444.1984(17)
9441.1986(45)
9441.1987(19)
9443.1987(08)
9444.1985(158)
9441.1984(33)
9551.1986(22)
9441.1986(96)
"9444.1984(02)
9453.1984(02)
9444.1989(05)
9444.1986(08)
9444.1987(33)
9441.1987(26)
9441.1984(24)
9553.1986(03)
9451.1986(06)
9444.1987(07)
9444.1987(03)
9442.1987(03)
9444.1988(07)
:9444.1985(03)!
9444.1987(30)
9444.1987(53) '
9444.1986(09)
9444.1987(09)
'9444.1987(22)
9444.1987(43)
9494.1986(04)
9442.1988(05)
9554.1987(02)
9444.1986(13)
:9444.1988(02)
19441.1987(28)
59441.1986(30)
=9432.1986(13)
!9444.1988(13)
s9442.1990(01)
"9444.1987(17)
.9441.1986(47)
9444.1988(11)
!9502.1986(11)
9444.1986(15)
9441.1987(09)
12/30/86
04/30/85
02/28/86
11/30/87,
02/28/88!
08/30/84
05/30/86
03/30/8?!
04/30/871
07/31/851
11/30/84
12/30/86!
12/30/861
03/30/84!
05/30/84i
07/21/891
05/02/86!
08/07/87:
04/17/87'
09/06/84!
12/11/86
12/15/86!
03/06/87!
01/27/87,
07/28/87i
04/07/88;
04/01/85,
07/21/87!
12/15/87!
05/02/86!
03/26/87,
06/24/87!
10/09/87:
04/11/86!
10/03/88!
02/03/87;
06/24/86!
01/20/88
04/30/87!
04/16/86!
08/06/86
07/28/88:
05/03/90;
05/20/87'
06/02/86,
05/05/88!
06/16/86!
08/04/86!
02/19/87'
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 129
REACTOR VESSEL WASHOUT CONTAINING TRACE AMOUNTS OF SOLVENT
RECLAIMED METHANOL IS A PRODUCT RATHER THAN A WASTE .
RECYCLING NICKEL, COPPER AND CHROMIUM-CONTAINING ELECTROPLATING SLUDGES
RECYCLING OF ELECTROPLATING SLUDGES (F006) FOR CEMENT/AGGREGATE MANUFACTURE
REGULATORY STATUS OF DRIP GAS GENERATED ALONG NATURAL GAS TRANSMISSION PIPELINES
RESIDUALS FROM TREATMENT OF RESTRICTED WASTES NOT COVERED BY LESS-THAN-1% SOLVENT EXTENSION
RINSE WATERS CONTAINING TCE SOLVENT
SLUDGES GENERATED FROM THE FIRST CLEANING STAGES OF PHOSPHATING PROCESS
SOLVENT LISTINGS AND LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
SOLVENT LISTINGS FOR PAINT WASTES/REMOVER AND SPILL RESIDUE
SOLVENT LISTINGS, SCOPE OF
SOLVENT-BEARING WASTEWATER, SLUDGE, AND BRINE TREATED AND STORED IN SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
SOLVENT/MIXTURE BLENDS
SOLVENTS USED AS COOLANTS AND APPLICABILITY OF SOLVENT LISTINGS
SOLVENTS USED AS REACTANT AND SOLVENT WASTES GENERATED BY A PRODUCTION PROCESS
SOLVENTS USED AS REACTANT NOT LISTED AS SPENT SOLVENT OR COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT
SPENT AND RECLAIMED SOLVENTS, BLENDING OF RECLAIMED XYLENE
SPENT CYANIDE PLATING BATH SOLUTIONS FROM SILVER RECOVERY
SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURE (NALCAST 6015/WATER/WAX)
STILL BOTTOM WASTE FROM POLYSTYRENE PRODUCTION
STILL BOTTOMS FROM LISTED SOLVENT RECLAMATION
SUBSTITUTION OF EXTRACTION SOLVENTS FOR METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TCLP EXTRACTIONS APPLIED TO LIQUID WASTES, OILS AND SOLVENT-BASED PRODUCTS
TCLP IN THE LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS PROGRAM AND HAZARDOUS WASTE IDENTIFICATION PROGRAM
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE CONTAMINATED WITH POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs)
THERMAL TREATMENT UNITS, SCOPE OF SUBPART X
TOLUENE AS A DILUANT OR CARRIER AND THE SCOPE OF THE F005 LISTING
TOLUENE-CONTAINING PAINT PRODUCTS FROM WOOD PIECES, REGULATORY STATUS
TOLUENE-LADEN FILTER RESIDUE GENERATED FROM AN INK PRODUCTION PROCESS
VOLATILIZATION OF SOLVENTS COUNTED AS SOLVENTS USED
WASTE FROM CHEMICAL ETCHING USING CYANIDE
WASTE FROM ELECTROLESS PLATING PROCESSES NOT COVERED UNDER REINTERPRETED F006 LISTING
WASTE INK AND SOLVENT MIXTURES GENERATED FROM PRINTING FACILITIES
WASTE LISTINGS F006 AND K062, SCOPE OF
WASTES FROM BRIGHT DIPPING UNDER THE REINTERPRETED F006 LISTING
WASTES FROM ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) ON CARBON STEEL EXCLUDED FROM F006
WASTES GENERATED IN A PROCESS USING METHYLENE CHLORIDE TO RECOVER ALKALOIDS FROM PLANT MATTER
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES RESULTING FROM METAL CLEANING PROCESS
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM, SOLVENT RECOVERY STILL BOTTOMS IN
WATER WALL SPRAY BOOTH WASTES AND THE SOLVENT LISTINGS
Rags and Wipers
DISPOSAL OF RAGS TO WIPE CRUDE OIL
DISPOSAL OR RECLAMATION OF RAGS
RAGS AND SIMILAR MATERIALS ABSORBING VOLATILES AND F-WASTES, HANDLING
RECYCLABLE CLOTH WIPERS AND DISPOSABLE INDUSTRIAL WIPERS USED TO CLEAN UP HAZARDOUS WASTES
REGULATORY STATUS AND MANAGEMENT OF DISPOSABLE AND LAUNDERABLE INDUSTRIAL RAGS AND WIPERS
REGULATORY STATUS OF USED INDUSTRIAL WIPERS AND SHOP TOWELS
SCRAP DEHP AND SMALL CAPACITORS CONTAINING DEHP, DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
Spent Solvents
*COMPARATIVE DEFINITIONS OF F001 AND F002
*DEFINITION OF SPENT SOLVENT
*GENERATION AND RECYCLING
*LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS: DISPOSAL OF WASTES GRANTED A VARIANCE
*METHANOL TREATMENT STANDARDS
*PERCHLOROETHYLENE USED IN DRY CLEANING
9444.1987(49)
9441.1985(33)
9441.1988(09)
9441.1989(19)
9444.1993(03)
9553.1987(07)
9441.1987(59)
9444.1986(11)
9444.1987(18)
9444.1987(11)
9444.1986(26)
9553.1987(01)
9444.1988(06)
9444.1987(02)
9444.1986(27)
9441.1986(92)
9441.1987(24)
9441.1989(34)
9444.1985(15)
9444.1987(38)
9444.1987(05)
9441.1988(25)
9442.1991(14)
9443.1987(29)
9444.1989(10)'
9489.1988(01)
9444.1987(36)
9443.1988(01)
9444.1985(09)
9441.1991(08)
9444.1987(16)
9444.1987(51)
9443.1984(08)
9444.1986(32)
9444.1987(28)
9444.1987(14)
9441.1986(52)
9444.1989(08)
9441.1985(43)
9444.1987(06)
9441.1989(23)
9444.1989(13)
9441.1989(50)
9441.1986(53)
9441.1993(19)
9441.1994(02)
9441.1985(23)
9444.1991(03)
9444.1989(023)
9441.1987(20)
9551.1988(05)
9554.1990(04)
9444.1992(04)
10/26/87
10/23/85
04/06/88
04/26/89
09/09/93
04/27/87
08/07/87
05/22/86
05/20/87
04/14/87
11/07/86
01/12/87
03/31/88
01/27/87
12/05/86 .
12/05/86
04/15/87
07/06/89
06/24/85
09/01/87
02/02/87
06/09/88
10/29/91
11/18/87
09/22/89
05/18/88
08/17/87
01/04/88
06/03/85?;
06/10/91
05/20/87
12/04/87
11/23/84
12/12/86
07/13/87
05/08/87
07/02/86
08/21/89
12/17/85
02/28/87
05/31/89
10/20/89
10/20/89
07/03/86
09/27/93
02/14/94
06/27/85
05/01/91
03/31/89
03/31/87
05/30/88
03/07/9Q
10/31/92
-------
• ^
I I
07/02/96
I i
I
I
I El!
m P
I
III!! I! IN HI I U H ' 1 i I = 1 ! II!
HP • I----* i tt '• '-I I •- i •! • I ' :• ' • - • - ' t^i
a ! . i -. >a i!«iCi! : :: ~, i H a ^si ; • ,! i': : i: i i s _ , i •_
a ; i i1 i ll •; jiSi i:? is": f ! ,j a s ; j = --. ;i .- - - ; • '= ~ =
•JSMALL QUANTITY MTERMiNAT&N! FOR JsOLVEHT RECLAIMER ! ,1 , ' " - I '
'SOLID HASTE: VARIANCE FOR SPENT SOLVENT : ! M : ! : :- - - ; :
•SOLVENT HIXTURE RULE ; i ' S! > '- ; Is;
'SOLVENT HIXTURE RULE APPLIED TO SPILL OF TOLUENE/BENZENE MIXTURE - CERCLA INTERFACE _ - -•
I i *SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS I h ! i i (II
'!'SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS ..-.-, , ,
Ii'SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS , ; - i 5 =
I!'SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES (F-WASTES) ! !! : = =
"! 'SPENT SOLVENTS PROM VARNISH STRIPPING : ] = -. -
: 'SPENT SOLVENTS IN SCINTALLATION COCKTAILS ' !
..! 'TECHNICAL GRADE SOLVENT FORMULATIONS AND THE F003 LISTING !
111,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE CONTAINED IN A SAND-METAL-SOLVENT MIXTURE . ' :
^ACTIVATED CARBON CANISTERS SATURATED WITH SPENT SOLVENTS . • -
;: BIF REGULATIONS EFFECTS ON INDUSTRIAL BOILER . ! _
11CHLOROFL00ROCARBONS (CFCs) AS REFRIGERANTS, RECYCLING OF SPENT '-. "- - - =
: i CLARIFICATION ON THE USE OF SOLVENTS AS REACTANTS IN MANUFACTURING PROCESSES I
i i CLARIFICATION ON: MANIFEST DOCUMENT NUMBER; F003, F005, D001; WASTE DESTINED FOR RECYCLING; AND! TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR CFC
' - CLASSIFICATION OF F003 WASTES
«! EXEMPTION FOR COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCTS BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
" IDENTIFICATION OF SPENT SOLVENT IN CERTAIN INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES
;-" INK FORMULATION WASTES AS BOTH K086 AND F001-005 WASTES
i 1 INTERPRETATION OF THE MIXTURE RULE EXEMPTION AS IT RELATES TO SCRUBBER WATER FROM THE INCINERATION OF CERTAIN SOLVENTS
11 IRON CAKE WASTE GENERATED DURING THE PRODUCTION OF METHYLDOPA <
I! LUBRICATING OIL AND JET FUELS USED TO PRODUCE PETROLEUM PRODUCTS i
!i MIXTURES OF SPENT SOLVENTS - F001-F005, REGULATORY STATUS OF
::ON-SITE RECYCLING OF SPENT SOLVENTS BY GENERATORS
M REGULATORY DETERMINATION - SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS AND THE MIXTURE RULE
! i REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS PERTAINING TO THE MANAGEMENT OF WASTE SOLVENTS AND USED OIL '
:: REGULATORY STATUS OF RECLAIMED SOLVENT FROM USED DRY CLEANING FILTERS
!! REGULATORY STATUS OF WASTE GENERATED BY MCLAUGHLIN GORMLEY KING (MGK) COMPANY IN MINNESOTA
!! RESIDUALS MATERIALS CONTAMINATED WITH TRACE SOLVENTS
H RESIDUE FROM SPENT SOLVENT RECLAMATION CONSIDERED HAZARDOUS
11 SOLVENT AND COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT WASTE STREAMS !
1 SOLVENT RECLAMATION OPERATIONS AT SEMICONDUCTOR FIRMS AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS :
! SOLVENT STILL AS RECYCLING UNIT - REGULATORY STATUS OF
: SOLVENT-CONTAMINATED WASTESTREAMS FROM A PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURER 1
i SOLVENT-CONTAMINATED WASTESTREAMS FROM PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURER !
: SOLVENT-CONTAMINATED WASTEWATER FROM FRAGRANCE MANUFACTURE
, SPENT PIPELINE FILTER CARTRIDGES
SPENT SOLVENT LISTINGS & LEACHATE FROM SANITARY LFs THAT RECEIVED HAZARDOUS WASTE :
SPENT SOLVENT RECOVERY, WASTE MANAGEMENT TAX
STILL BOTTOM WASTE GENERATED BY A POLYSTYRENE PRODUCTION FACILITY :
STILL BOTTOMS GENERATED AND REMOVED FROM A RECYCLING UNIT
WASTE GENERATED DURING THE MANUFACTURE OF POLYURETHANE FOAM
WASTE SOLVENT-BASED GLUE
WASTES GENERATED FROM EXTRACTION PROCESS
I
1
! -
i
1
r
i
9441.1987(10)
9433.^985(03)
9441.1987(18)
9443.1985(11)
9444.1986(14)
9444.1988(09)
9441.1989(55}
9443.1986(05)
9441.1986(57)
9444.1989(020)
9444.1994(05)
9443.1989(07)
9441.1986(54)
9488.1991(03)
9441.1989(40)
9444.1985(08)
9441.1994(26)
9444.1992(05)
9441.1988(33)
9441.1992(44)
9444.1987(41)
9441.1994(16)
9443.1987(32)
9494.1985(01)
9441.1984(06)
9441.1986(21)
9441.1992(21)
9441.1992(36)
9441.1992(11)
9444.1992(03)
9444.1991(04)
9441.1984(03)
9444.1989(03)
9441.1986(89)
9441.1985(24)
9441.1988(49)
9443.1988(11)
9442.1987(06)
9444.1988(03)
9444.1983(01)
9441.1986(41)
9432.1988(01)
9453.1989(04)
9441.1992(24)
9443.1989(02)
9442.1986(07)
'MM i
ll pi i !
11 I) f !
Page Ho. 130
IF
; -i
02/28/87
09/30/85
03/30/87
11/30/85
06/310/86
04/30/88
10/30/89
01/30/86
05/30/86
03/31/89
06/30/94
07/10/89
07/15/86:
09/23/91!
08/02/891
05/24/85!
09/28/94!
11/04/92
07/27/88'
12/22/92
09/15/87
06/10/94!
12/16/87!
10/01/85:
04/10/84
03/13/86
07/16/92
10/28/92
05/28/92
10/20/92
08/30/91'
02/16/84!
06/28/89
12/02/86
06/27/85
12/06/88
12/06/88 ,
10/26/87
02/11/88
06/10/83
05/20/86
02/11/88 -
04/18/89
08/17/92
04/12/89
07/02/86
IJ s SPENT MATERIALS
;! ' (See Solid Waste)
{' ' SPENT SOLVENTS
|l ; (See Solvents)
I I
IN
XREF
XREF
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 131
SPILLS
(See Contingency Plan) (See also Corrective Action)
XREF
SRE
(See System Removal Efficiency)
STATE AUTHORIZATION
ABOVE-GROUND LAND EMPLACEMENT FACILITIES, N.J. LAW
ALTERNATE CONCENTRATION LIMIT (ACL) POLICY FOR HSWA PROVISIONS
CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZATION - EVALUATION OF THE WASTE EVALUATION TEST
CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE ISSUES FOR INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
COAL ASH AS A SOLID WASTE
CORRECTIVE ACTION AT FEDERAL FACILITIES
EFFECTIVE DATES FOR CHARACTERISTIC & LISTED WASTES PER 03/19/87 CLEAN CLOSURE REGULATION
JURISDICTION AND REGULATION OF MIXED WASTE MANAGEMENT INCLUDING INCINERATION AND LOCATION CRITERIA
K006 WASTE AND ONSITE DISPOSAL UNIT CONTAINING THESE WASTES
PROCESS WASTE DELISTED BY THE STATE DESIGNATES THE WASTE NON-HAZARDOUS WITHIN THE STATE
RCRA 3001 (f) (2) (b) AND STATES' EXCLUSION OF WASTES FROM REGULATION AS HAZARDOUS
REGULATION OF HAZARDOUS COMPONENTS OF RADIOACTIVE MIXED WASTE
RISK RETENTION GROUPS AND FINANCIAL ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
STATE AUTHORIZATION TO REGULATE HAZARDOUS COMPONENTS OF RADIOACTIVE MIXED WASTES
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES CONTAINING METHANOL
Authorized States
*FEDERAL AUTHORITY OVER AUTHORIZED STATES
CARBON REGENERATION UNITS - REGULATORY STATUS
CHANGES DURING INTERIM STATUS IN PHASE II AUTHORIZED STATES
DELISTING OF WASTE BY AUTHORIZED STATES
DETERMINING WHETHER STATE HAZARDOUS WASTE REQ. ARE BROADER OR MORE STRINGENT THAN THE FEDERAL RCRA PROGRAM
DRAFT STATE RCRA PERMITS, EPA REVIEW OF
EPA ENFORCEMENT OF RCRA-AUTHORIZED STATE HAZARDOUS WASTE LAWS AND REGULATIONS
FEDERAL DELISTING AND RCRA PERMITTING IN INTERIM AUTHORIZED STATES
INTERIM AUTHORIZATION OF PROGRAMS BASED ON EMERGENCY STATE REGULATIONS
K006 WASTE AND ONSITE DISPOSAL UNIT CONTAINING THESE WASTES
MIXED WASTES AT DOE FACILITIES, REGULATION OF
PART B FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY INFO. REQ. FOR OWNERS/OPERATORS IN STATES WITH ONLY PHASE 1 AUTHORIZATION
PIG-82-5 AND RSI »5 JOINT PERMITTING IN PHASE I AUTHORIZED STATES
QUANTUM TECH PLASMA ARC UNIT - REGULATORY CLASSIFICATION
RCRA PERMIT REAUTHORIZATION ISSUES IN REGION III
RELEASES OF HAZARDOUS WASTE, RCRA APPLICABILITY TO
ROLE OF AUTHORIZED STATES IN DISPUTE RESOLUTION
STATE CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT GUIDANCE
STATE PERMITTING DURING PHASE I INTERIM AUTHORIZATION
TC APPLICABILITY TO MIXED WASTE
TRANSFER OF FEDERAL RCRA PERMITS TO AUTHORIZED STATES AND COMPLIANCE WITH 40 CFR 124.10(e)
WASTES NEWLY REGULATED UNDER HSWA, MANAGEMENT OF
Capability Assessments
HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT CAPACITY AND RCRA CONSISTENCY ISSUES
Chanqing Federal Regulations
DEMONSTRATING EQUIVALENCE OF PART 265 CLEAN CLOSURE WITH PART 264 REQUIREMENTS
RADIOACTIVE WASTE EXEMPTION IN NORTH AND SOUTH CAROLINA
XREF
XREF
9487.1986(04)
9481.1987(07)
9442.1988(03)
9476.1987(08)
9571.1990(02)
9502.1986(06)
9476.00-16
9541.1986(14)
9432.1987(09)
9541.1986(04)
9541.1986(05)
9541.1986(19)
9477.00-5
9541.1986(20)
9441.1989(52)
9541.1988(01)
9489.1991(04)
9542.1983(01)
9542.1980(04)
9541.1984(04)
9522.1984(04)
9541.1982(01)
9542.1982(02)
9542.1980(02)
9432.1987(09)
9503.1985(02)
9477.1982(01)
9543.00-1
9488.1991(04)
9541.1985(01)
9502.1987(05)
9541.1987(01)
9543.1984(01)
9542.1980(03)
9441.1991(02)
9541.1984(05)
9541.1985(05)
9572.1988(03)
9476.00-18
9541.1984(08)
II
03/26/86
07/24/87
05/02/88
12/17/87
04/09/90
04/15/86
04/01/88
07/03/86
08/19/87
03/03/86
10/31/86
10/14/86 . ...
11/23/87
10/20/86
10/06/89
01/30/88 ,
08/02/91 T
08/02/83
10/31/80
05/21/84
10/01/84
05/17/82
07/09/82
10/03/80
08/19/87
08/30/85
05/24/82
10/03/85
09/30/91
03/06/85
04/02/87
01/14/87
12/27/84
10/17/80
02/12/91
06/13/84
05/06/8B
12/23/88
05/12/83
09/13/84
-------
a 07/02/96
I!
KEYWORD INDEX
-t
Page Ho. 132
I !
STATE PERMITTING DURING PHASE I INTERIM AUTHORIZATION
(Interim Authorization t \ I : i ! !; i = - _
RCRA RSI 02: EXTENSION OF INTERIM AUTHORIZATION HAZARDOUS HASTE PROGRAMS '_
Joint Permitting ; ! 1 ! =
FEDERAL PERMITS IN STATES WHICH HAVE RECEIVED FINAL AUTHORIZATION _ _ _
HSHA AUTHORIZATION ISSUES - JOINT PERMITTING !
RCRA PERMIT REAUTHORIZATION ISSUES IN REGION III
RCRA PERMITS WITH HSHA CONDITIONS - JOINTLY ISSUED PERMITS
HASTE MINIMIZATION: PERMIT CERTIFICATION AND JOINT PERMITTING
HASTES NEHLY REGULATED UNDER HSHA, MANAGEMENT OF
More Stringent/Broader in Scope !
*STATE PROGRAMS I —~^=
AUTHORIZATION OF STATE PROGRAMS TO IMPLEMENT LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS PROGRAMS " • ~
DETERMINING HHETHER STATE HAZARDOUS HASTE REQ. ARE BROADER OR MORE STRINGENT THAN! THE FEDERAL RCRA PROGRAM^
SLUDGES HITHIN SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, NEHLY REGULATED DUE TO TC RULE
Pre-HSMA Provisions
INDUSTRIAL FURNACES BURNING HAZARDOUS HASTES AND THE RESIDUALS GENERATED (LOUISIANA REG)
State Laws : -
*LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTION r ;
DESIGNATED FACILITY UNDER THE TREATABILITY STUDY EXCLUSION
HSBA AUTHORIZATION ISSUES - JOINT PERMITTING : .' ~
STATE AUTHORIZATION AND REGULATION OF RADIOACTIVE MIXED HASTES !: -I
USED BATTERIES RETURNED FOR REGENERATION EXEMPTION ••
State Permits • .
DRAFT STATE RCRA PERMITS, EPA REVIEH OF i \\
INVOLVEMENT OF STATES WITHOUT PHASE II INTERIM AUTHORIZATION IN RCRA PERMITTING =
REQUIREMENT THAT STATE-PERMITTED HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITIES HAVE INTERIM STATUS : - !:
STATE PERMITS ISSUED BEFORE RECEIVING RCRA PHASE II AUTHORIZATION i ~, -
State Programs \ -_-"
*DELISTING BY STATES ! !' • 2
*SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE GRANTS FOR STATES I -'. -
EXCLUSION OF HASTE GENERATED AT INDIVIDUAL FACILITIES (DELISTING)
HSWA EFFECT ON STATE DELISTING DECISIONS !
LETTER TO STATE ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSIONERS: SUBTITLE D STATE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLANS s i!
STATE PROGRAM ADVISORY »2 - RCRA AUTHORIZATION TO REGULATE MIXED WASTE - - - i: ——
STATE PROGRAM REVISION AUTHORIZATIONS PILOT DELEGATION TO THE REGIONS ' i; - —
TRANSFER OF NOTIFICATION AND PERMIT APPLICATION INFORMATION TO STATES •
State Regulations
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA REGULATIONS REGARDING LARGE QUANTITY GENERATORS, TO THE VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER
CONTAINED-IN POLICY
INCINERATORS FOR DESTRUCTION OF NERVE AGENTS, HIGH PRIORITY PERMITTING
LEAD SHEILDING FOR RADIOACTIVE WASTE IS A RCRA SOLID WASTE
LOCATION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES
PROCESS WASTE DELISTED BY THE STATE DESIGNATES THE WASTE NON-HAZARDOUS WITHIN THE STATE
STATE REGULATION OF FEDERAL AGENCIES FOR PURPOSE OF INTERIM AUTHORIZATION :
9542.1980(03) 10/17/80
9542.i:1985(01) 01/11/85
STATE LAWS
3541.:i984(09)
9541.11985(09)
9541.1985(01)
9502.1987(06)
9560.1985(01)
9541.1985(05)
9572.1986(01)
9541.1986(13)
9541.1954(04)
9484.1991(01)
[ -
| |
9494.|1987(02)
i !
9541.1987(10)
9432.3.991(01)
9541.il985(09)
9541.1987(04)
9497.1991(01)
!
9522 .'1984(04)
9542.1981(01)
9542.1980(01)
9542.1982(03)
9541.1986(24)
9581.1988(01)
9542.1982(01)
9433.1985(02)
9572.00-02
9541.00-6
9541.1991(01)
9542.1981(02)
9441.1994(30)
9441.1991(04)
9501.1986(01)
9444.1991(02)
9472.1991(01)
9541.1986(04)
9542.1980(05)
04/04/84
07/01/85
03/06/85
06/30/87
09/11/85
05/06/85
09/30/86
06/24/86
05/21/84
03/08/91
, 04/15/87
i 12/30/87
09/27/91
' 07/01/85
1 06/29/87
! 03/04/91
• 10/01/84
i 02/12/81
"10/03/80
! 08/09/82
' 10/30/86
S 11/01/88
! 05/25/82
. 05/16/85
'02/22/88
* 07/30/87
i 03/11/91
; 03/24/81
j
j 11/23/94
! 03/26/91
' 09/11/86
j 04/30/91
J10/01/91
i03/03/86
jll/14/80
(See istate Authorization)
XREF
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 133
STATE PERMITS
(See State Authorization)
STATE PROGRAMS
(See State Authorization)
STATE REGULATIONS
(See State Authorization)
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
CLARIFICATION ON RCRA AND TSCA JURISDICTION OVER INFECTIOUS AND/OR GENETICALLY ENGINEERED WASTE
REGULATION OF HAZARDOUS COMPONENTS OF RADIOACTIVE MIXED WASTE
STEEL FOUNDRIES
(See Listed Hazardous Waste)
STORAGE
(See also Containers, Hazardous Waste Fuels, Tank System, Permit Conditions)
*100-1000 Kg/MONTH GENERATORS
•CERTIFICATION FOR CONTAINER STORAGE
*HAZARDOUS WASTE TANK CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE
*LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - STORAGE OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
*PROHIBITION ON STORAGE OF RESTRICTED WASTES
•SATELLITE ACCUMULATION
•SECONDARY CONTAINMENT VARIANCES FOR TANKS
*SQG 100-1000 Kg/MONTH GENERATORS, AND THE MANIFEST
•STORAGE OF RESTRICTED WASTES
•STORAGE PRIOR TO RECYCLING
•WASTE ANALYSIS FOR SIMPLE STORAGE AT INTERIM STATUS FACILITIES
ABOVE-GROUND LAND EMPLACEMENT FACILITIES, N.J. LAW
ACCUMULATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN TANKS (90-DAY)
ACCUMULATION OF SECONDARY MATERIAL - ABANDONED VS. DISPOSED OF
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS AND STORAGE STANDARDS FOR MARKETERS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
APPLICABILITY OF A PROPOSED HAZARDOUS WASTE REGULATION TO CERTAIN DOE RADIOACTIVE MIXED WASTES
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA TO HAZARDOUS WASTES GENERATED IN PRODUCT STORAGE TANKS AND MANUFACTURING PROCESS UNITS
CLARIFICATION OF REGULATORY LANGUAGE WITH RESPECT TO PERMITTED HAZARDOUS WASTE CONTAINER STORAGE FACILITIES
CLARIFICATION REGARDING THE HAZARDOUS WASTE SAMPLE EXCLUSION FOUND IN 40 CFR 261.4(d)
f1! OQlIRP RFOtJTRFMENTS
CONTAINERS FOR SAFE AND ECONOMICAL STORAGE, TRANSPORT, AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE, DEVELOPMENT OF
CONTAINMENT AND DETECTION OF RELEASE FROM HAZARDOUS STORAGE TANK SYSTEMS
COPPER PLATING SOLUTION REACTED WITH A CHELATING AGENT TO PRODUCE A COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER
DOD MUNITIONS BECOME SOLID WASTE SUBJECT TO RCRA WHEN THERE IS AN INTENT TO DISPOSE OR DESTROY THEM
FOUNDRY SANDS RECYCLED AND RETURNED TO THE FOUNDRY
GENERATOR WITH RESPECT TO REGULATION OF OPERATIONAL WASTES FROM SHIPS, DEFINITION
HAZARDOUS WASTE RECYCLERS
HAZARDOUS WASTES THAT ARE RECYCLED, HANDLING
HOLDING, TEMPORARY, PERIOD, STORAGE, AND DISPOSAL (DEFINITIONS)
INTERPRETATION OF 3005 (j)(l)
MANAGEMENT OF WASTES PRIOR TO INTRODUCTION INTO SEWER
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF A
9441.1995(06)
9541.1986(19)
XREF "
02/21/95
10/14/86
XREF
9451.1987(04)
9523.1983(02)
9476.1986(02)
9551.1987(05)
9453.1986(06)
9453.1985(06)
9483.1986(08)
9475.1985(02)
9551.1986(24)
9475.1987(01)
9472.1983(01)
9487.1986(04)
9453.1982(01)
9441.1985(25)
9494.1986(05)
9482.1994(01)
9441.1995(09)
9482.1995(01)
9441.1994(22)
9476.00-12
9482.1985(01)
9483.1988(10)
9493.1986(01)
9441.1985(31)
9441.1987(13)
9432.1986(05)
9461.1988(01)
9441.1986(76)
9432.1986(12)
9484.1985(01)
9441.1986(73)
/ /
08/30/87
02/28/83
09/30/86
02/28/87
11/30/86
12/30/85
10/30/86
10/30/85
12/30/86
04/30/87
. 07/30/83
03/26/86
08/31/82
07/01/85
04/11/86
09/02/94
03/08/95
06/30/95
08/11/94
02/02/88
11/26/85
06/03/88
01/22/86
10/03/85
03/04/87
02/05/86
08/31/88
10/08/86
07/28/86
07/25/85
09/25/86
-------
1 III
! I
07/02/9*
KEYWORD
ttt
mir
I'M i i
il ir
•
. -z
3-
FACILITY-
'MIXED WASTE REGULATIONi - RCRA 'REQUIREMENTS 1 VS. NRC REQUIREMENTS s _ -^
MOBILE RECYCLING WHIT FOR REPROCESSING HASTE SOLVENTS : = p
MO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR MARATHON PETROLEUM, IL = = -
!RCRA STORAGE FACILITY REOUIREMENTS, OFF-LOADING FROM TANK TRUCKS _ _
RECYCLING OF MOLDING AND CASTING SANDS ; ; |^
REGULATION AND PERMITTING OF LABORATORIES ' -. -=»
:REGULATORY INTERPRETATIONS UNDER RCRA CONCERNING CERTAIN FUEL BLENDING SCENARIOS ,„
(REPROCESSING OF BATTERIES
(REQUIREMENTS OF A FACILITY GENERATING, STORING, AND MANIFESTING F001
(REUSE/RECYCLE REGULATIONS IMPACT ON SPENT LEAD-ACID BATTERY RECYCLING !
iSECONDARY LEAD SMELTER VARIANCES ! I
SLUDGE HASTE HANDLING IF TEMP. EXCLUSION IS WITHDRAWN / FUTURE METALS RECOVERY-STEEL!
SOLVENT RECLAMATION OPERATIONS AT SEMICONDUCTOR FIRMS AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS ; ! i _
ISPENT SULFURIC ACID ACCUMULATED SPECULATIVELY I i -
iSTORAGE FACILITIES, RCRA APPLICABILITY TO : * ! _ ~
iSTORAGE PERMIT FOR FACILITIES INVOLVED IN HAZARDOUS WASTE RECYCLING I \ '
iSUMMARY OF ASSISTANCE BRANCH PERMITTING COMMENTS ; i ! _
iTANK SYSTEMS SINCE CHANGES IN DEFINITION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE, CLASSIFICATION OF ' ~ .
.TRANSPORTATION REGULATIONS r
!USE OF MULTIPLE TRANSFER FACILITIES AS PART OF THE "NORMAL COURSE OF TRANSPORTATION"!
STUDENT',S T TEST * ;
! (See Groundwater Monitoring) ! : —
SUBPART :X 5
i(See also Permit Application, Federal Facilities, Characteristic Hazardous Waste) ; • _ —
i*TREATABILITY STUDIES ON HAZARDOUS WASTE SAMPLES, PERMIT REQUIREMENTS '
(DETONATING EXPLOSIVE WASTES . ; , = ^
(TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION FOR WET-AIR OXIDATION UNIT(VERTECH) 6 ; =- _
Geologic Repositories = I = ^
(PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR DISPOSAL IN SALT DOMES 4 I = j;
PERMITS FOR PLACEMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN UNDERGROUND SALT MINES ! i -=
Miscellaneous Units ' I J 3
A DETERMINATION OF WHETHER A DETOX (SM) WET OXIDATION PROCESS WOULD BE REGULATED UNDER SUBPART3C OR UNDER SUBPART 0
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA REGULATIONS TO A PROPOSED FUMING/GASIFICATION UNIT
CLARIFICATION ON THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN THERMAL DESORBERS AND INCINERATORS
DETONATING EXPLOSIVE WASTES
DRUM SHREDDER REGULATION -
MISCELLANEOUS UNITS SUBPART X, IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE
OPEN. BURNING/OPEN DETONATION AT DOD FACILITIES ~
PERMITS FOR PLACEMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN UNDERGROUND SALT MINES I
RCRA REGULATORY INTERPRETATION ON BENZENE STRIPPERS AT WRC REFINERY
REGULATORY STATUS OF SHELL OIL'S NORCO, LOUISIANA FACILITY DITCH SYSTEM s; :
SUMMARY OF ASSISTANCE BRANCH PERMITTING COMMENTS j !
THREE AND FOUR-SIDED, FLOORED STRUCTURES, REGULATORY CLASSIFICATION OF ? :
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION FOR WET-AIR OXIDATION UNIT(VERTECH) j!
ft I I
!l
Open Burning/Open Detonation (OB/OD) '
DEMILITARIZATION OF MUNITIONS 4 . =
DOD MUNITIONS BECOME SOLID WASTE SUBJECT TO RCRA WHEN THERE IS AN INTENT TO DISPOSE OR DESTROY THEM
FIRE TRAINING PITS, REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR
INCLUSION OF EMISSIONS FROM OB/OD UNITS IN THE HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT FOR A CHEMICAL AGENT DISPOSAL FACILITY
MISCELLANEOUS UNITS SUBPART X, IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE I
M
I I
P*g*|Mo. 134
9151.1989(02)
9441.1986(30)
9551.0990(09)
9488.1988(01)
9441,1986(01)
9441.1.988(39)
9498.1994(12)
9497.1987(02)
9475.[1986 (Ola)
9497.1986(01)
9444.1988(14)
9433.0986(17)
9441.1986(89)
9441.|l988(19)
9432.J1983(02)
9441.11989(11)
9523.100-17
9483.1988(03)
9461.11990(01)
9461.-1994 (01)
XREF
05/26/89
04/16/86
11/06/90
12/09/88
01/06/86
08/30/88
11/08/94
02/19/87
10/30/86
02/06/86
08/26/68
09/30/86
12/02/86
05/26/88
11/29/83
03/27/89
09/02/88
02/08/88
06/07/90,
06/21/94!
XREF
9441.
9443.
1986(58)
1987(30)
9432.1986(06)
9489J199K05)
9472 .'1986 (04)
9489.
1995(02)
9431.il994(02)
9489.
9443.
1994(01)
1987(30)
9441.h.988(28) -
9489.100-2
9502.1986(16)
9472.
9489.
1986(04)
1992(02)
9432.11994(01)
9523.00-18
9432.
9432.
1987(02)
1986(06)
9441.1987(03)
9441.
9489.
9489.
9489.
1985(31)
1987(02)
1995(01)
00-2
^H
/ /
06/30/86
11/30/87
02/06/86
02/22/91
06/04/86
08/02/95
11/15/94
02/23/94
11/30/87
06/24/88
04/22/87
09/22/86
06/04/86
08/27/92
02/01/94
03/14/89
04/02/87
02/06/86
01/07/87
10/03/85
07/22/87
01/30/95
04/22/87
\
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 135
OPEN BURNING/OPEN DETONATION AT DOD FACILITIES
REGULATORY INTERPRETATION OF LOSS OF INTERIM STATUS PROVISIONS AS IT APPLIES TO OB/OD FACILITIES
REGULATORY STATUS OF AN OPEN BURNING UNIT USED FOR TREATING EXCESS PROPELLANT
THERMAL TREATMENT UNITS, SCOPE OF SUBPART X
Thermal Treatment
ASH RESIDUE GENERATED FROM INCINERATION OF K045
CARBON REGENERATION UNITS - REGULATORY STATUS
CLARIFICATION ON THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN THERMAL DESORBERS AND INCINERATORS
ON-SITE TREATMENT EXEMPTION, REINTERPRETATION OF
' QUANTUM TECH PLASMA ARC UNIT - REGULATORY CLASSIFICATION
REGULATORY DETERMINATION ON THE STATUS OF PRECIOUS METAL RECOVERY FURNACES
THERMAL TREATMENT UNITS, SCOPE OF SUBPART X
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION FOR WET-AIR OXIDATION UNIT(VERTECH)
SUBPARTS AA AND BB
(See also Incineration)
CONTROL DEVICES REQUIRED BY THE ORGANIC AIR EMISSION STANDARD
INTERPRETATION OF CERTAIN CONNECTORS AS "FLANGES"
SUBTITLE D
(See Solid Waste)
SUMPS
(See Secondary Containment)
SUPERFUND
(See RCRA/CERCLA Interface)
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT
(See also Land Disposal Facilities)
"CIRCUMSTANCES FOR OBTAINING INTERIM STATUS FOR UNITS AT AN INTERIM STATUS FACILITY
*CLEAN CLOSURE
*CLEAN CLOSURE OF INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT AND WASTE PILE
*CLOSURE OF INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
*CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT
"EXISTING SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS WITH LINERS
"INTERIM STATUS VS. PERMIT MODIFICATION FOR NEWLY REGULATED UNITS
"LEAK NOTIFICATION AT A DOUBLE-LINED SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT
"POST-CLOSURE PERMITS FOR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT
"PROTECTIVE COVERS FOR INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
"REMOVAL OF TC WASTE FROM A SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT
"RETROFITTING FOR PERMITTED SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
"RETROFITTING INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
"RETROFITTING SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
"SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS CONTAINING WASTEWATER WHICH BECOMES REACTIVE WHEN DRY
"SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS RECEIVING HAZARDOUS WASTE
ADJACENT WASTE PILES INTO REGULATED SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT, PLACEMENT OF (CIBA-GEIGY)
CLARIFICATION OF "ACTIVE MANAGEMENT" IN CLOSING WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES (SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS)
CLOSURE AFTER CESSATION OF RECEIPT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE ISSUES FOR INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
CLOSURE OF A DOE SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT THAT LOST INTERIM STATUS
9502.1986(16)
9528.1992(01)
9489.1992(01)
9489.1988(01)
9441.1987(12)
9489.1991(04)
9489.1994(01)
9453.1987(08)
9488.1991(04)
9496.1993(01)
9489.1988(01)
9432.1986(06)
XREF
9534.1991(01)
9531.1993(01)
09/22/86
10/15/92
08/24/92
05/18/88
03/03/87
08/02/91
02/23/94
12/15/87
09/30/91
12/27/93
05/18/88
02/06/86
/ /
: 12/03/91
; 02/23/93
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
9522
9476
9522
9484
9484
9522
9525
9484
9522
9484
9443
9484
9528
9476
9443
9441
9484
9484
9476
9476
9484
>'. .
>
.1984(01)
.1987(03)
.1988(01)
.1987(04)
.1986(07)
.1984(02)
.1989(01)
.1985(02)
.1986(023)
.1984(01)
.1991(02)
.1987(09)
.1988(03)
.1986(04)
.1983(02)
.1983(01)
.1987(06)
.1994(01)
.1986(03)
.1987(08)
.1986(02)
.. ' - ' •-'
/ /
/ / .
12/31/84
06/30/87
02/28/88
04/30/87
07/30/86
05/30/84
05/30/89
08/30/85
10/30/86
12/31/84
11/01/91
07/30/87
05/30/88
10/30/86
01/30/83
02/01/83
06/26/87
04/06/94
10/08/86
12/17/87
04/02/86
-------
07/02/96
m
11
! 1
KEYWORD INDEX
11
I
=& i Ml i -Mi i == .,,,,,,„,,,, „, ,, : :: J
CLOSURE PERFORMANCE: STANDARD ! : =. ! IL : i i
CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS I i •= - ! i i Ml
COMBINATION OP SLUDGES FROM ALL (IMPOUNDMENTS TO DETERMINE HASTE VOLUME FOR VIIS ANALYSIS : i C
CONTAMINATED GROUND HATER AND VOLATILBS FROMiAIR STRIPPING, TREATMENT OF : ' ;
DEADLINES APPLICABLE TO PROPOSED DELAY OF CLOSURE REGULATION, GUIDANCE ,1
HYDROGEN SULFIDE WASTE IN SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT - REACTIVITY CHARACTERISTIC i II
IMPROVEMENTS TO SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS UNDER INTERIM STATUS j
INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS & CLEAN CLOSED HASTE PILES, CODIFICATION RULE 12/01/87 ! I j I
INTERPRETATION OF 3005(j)(1) M \ ' -
K035 LISTING AND INCLUSION OF SLUDGES FROM BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF CREOSOTE PRODUCTION WASTEBATERS J '
K103/K104 WASTE STREAMS - RELATIONSHIP OF CHA BAT, LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS, BOAT, AND DELISTING CRITERIA
LAND DISPOSAL UNIT CLOSURE CLARIFICATION OF PROPOSED AND PROMULGATED RULES
LIME SLUDGE IMPOUNDMENT SLUDGE, DELISTING OF
METAL, K061 WASTES IN SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT-DELISTING PETITION
MTR COMPLIANCE DATES FOR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS (THERMEX ENERGY)
NEUTRALIZATION SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, GROUNDWATER MONITORING FOR CLOSURE OF INTERIM-STATUS
NO-MIGRATION PETITION FOR ROBINSON, IL
OILY WASTEWATER TREATMENT PONDS, PERMITTING COVERAGE OF
OPERATING DAY DEFINED FOR TANKS AND SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, THERMEX ENERGY/RADIAN ',
PETROLEUM REFINERY WW, MIXTURE AND DERIVED-FROM RULES
POTENTIALLY CONFLICTING REGULATION OF INFILTRATION GALLERIES BY THE OGWDH AND OSW
PREVIOUSLY UNREGULATED SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT - CORRECTIVE ACTION ORDERS
REDESIGNATION OF SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS AS LANDFILLS DURING INTERIM STATUS
REGULATORY STATUS OF SHELL OIL'S NORCO, LOUISIANA FACILITY DITCH SYSTEM
REPLACEMENT UNIT, DEFINED - WASTE CONSOLIDATION FROM SEVERAL IMPOUNDMENTS
REPLACEMENT UNIT, DEFINITION, FOR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT
SECONDARY LEACHATE COLLECTION AND REMOVAL SYSTEMS - FML TOP LINERS
SLUDGE CONTAINING 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE (TCE)
SLUDGES WITHIN SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, NEHLY REGULATED DUE TO TC RULE
SOLVENT-BEARING WASTEHATER, SLUDGE, AND BRINE TREATED AND STORED IN SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
SPENT PICKLE LIQUOR, USE/REUSE EXEMPTION AS APPLIED TO
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT CLOSURE, APPLICABILITY OF 3005(1) OF RCRA TO
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT DELISTING PETITIONS, USE OF VHS MODEL
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT RECEIVING LEACHATE, REGULATION OF
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT RETROFITTING AND TIME ALLOWED FOR CLOSURE
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT SAMPLING PLAN FOR HOLLOMAN AIR FORCE BASE
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS HOLDING ONLY K-WASTES GENERATED UNDER A TEMPORARY EXCLUSION
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS VIS-A-VIS NPDES-PERMITTED DISCHARGE POINTS
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS/LAND TREATMENT UNITS REGULATION IF ASSOCIATED WWT SLUDGES ARE LISTED
TANK AND SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT, DEFINITIONS -
TC RULE HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION
THREE AND FOUR-SIDED, FLOORED STRUCTURES, REGULATORY CLASSIFICATION OF
TREATMENT SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, REGULATORY OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO WOOD PRESERVERS
UCAPCO APPLICATION FOR A VARIANCE UNDER 3004 (c) (2) OF RCRA
WOOD PRESERVING AND SURFACE PROTECTION FACILITIES, CONTROLLING ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES FROM
Retrofit
ACLs APPLIED TO SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT RETROFITTING PROVISION 3005 (j) (3)
ALTERNATE CONCENTRATION LIMIT (ACL) POLICY FOR HSWA PROVISIONS
NEUTRALIZATION SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, RETROFITTING VARIANCES -
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT (IS) RETROFITTING WAIVER REQUEST (OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL)
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT RECEIVING NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE AFTER HAZARDOUS WASTE W/0 RETROFITTING ;
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT RETROFITTING REQUIREMENTS :
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT RETROFITTING WAIVER REQUEST (UNION CARBIDE) :
i ill
if! Hi-
«! li
; " N't
02/08/88
94:76»001-12B i 02/02/88
94;33, 1987 (07)1 04/13/87
94'41. 1986(86) t 11/20/861
l94j76.198B'(04l)l
. 05/31/81
!9«3V19B7;(3ll)ll 12/07/871
9528.1984!(0i;r" 09/10/841
9522.19881(05)1 11/30/88:
9484.1985(01)
J9444. 1987(52);
19433.1987(06)1
9476.1985(05)'
9484.1986(05)1
:9433.1987(18)!
9484.1987(11)1
'9484. 1986 {03)1
9551.1991(14)!
39502. 1984(01) =
3483.1987(19)1
3521. 1987 (01)1
:;9441.1985<29) =
"9521,1991(01)1
19502. 1986 (07a)
19528.1988(02) 1
'9432.1994(01)
•9484.1987(01) •
07/25/8&
12/11/87,
04/02/87
12/13/85
05/23/86
08/07/87
08/07/87
04/09/86
05/01/91
12/07/84
10/16/87
08/07/87
08/23/85
08/27/91
04/30/86
05/11/88
02/01/94
03/11/87
19484.1986(01) J 03/26/86
3484.1987(03)
=9551. 1987(13)
9484.1991(01) :
9553.1987,101)
9441.1985(20)
,9523.00-12
9476.1987(01) !
9433.1987(25) 1
9484. 1985 (Olb)
9484.00-53
9484.1988(03)
9433.1987(23) :
9484.1986(09)
9480.1985(02)
3483.1983(01)-
9441.1991(12)
9432.1987(02)
9484.1987(12) !
9480.1987(02) i
9441.1986(28) ;
:
04/30/87
06/26/87
03/08/91
01/12/87
06/05/85
03/30/87
06/09/87
10/26/87
11/14/85
10/15/88
06/20/88
10/05/87
12/29/86
= 07/17/85
04/08/83
07/31/91
04/02/87
11/25/87
10/29/87
• 04/07/86
;9484.1987(08) •
;9481. 1987(07) i
^9484.1986(04) 1
3484.1987(07) I
19484.1986(08) !
19484.1987(02) il
i9484.1987(05) il
1 il
07/14/87
07/24/87
04/21/86
07/14/87
09/05/86
04/15/87
06/08/87
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No.
SURFACE WATER
SW-846
(See also Wastewater, Clean Water Act)
ACLs PROPOSED BY UNION CARBIDE CORP., INSTITUTE, WV, COMMENTS ON
MARINE DEBRIS IN WATERS, DISPOSAL OF
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
*SW-846 TEST METHODS
ADDITIONAL ANALYTES FOR HWIR TARGET ANALYTE LIST IN WASTEWATER
ALLOWABLE HOLDING TIMES WHEN TESTING RCRA SAMPLES
ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR CONDUCTING TESTING UNDER THE TC RULE
ASTM D4982-89 (METHOD B) AS AN EQUIVALENT METHOD OF TESTING FOR IGNITABILITY
ASTM STANDARDS IN THE RCRA PROGRAM
CALCULATION OF TCLP CONCENTRATIONS FROM TOTAL CONCENTRATIONS
CHARACTERIZATION OF WASTE STREAMS FROM POLYMERIC COATING OPERATIONS
CLARIFICATION OF METHOD 8260 CALIBRATION STANDARDS AND "WASTE TYPE"
CLARIFICATION OF PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
CLARIFICATION OF THE LDR PHASE II REGULATION THAT APPEARED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER ON SEPTEMBER 19, 1994
CLARIFICATION ON ANALYTICAL QUANTITATION USING GC/MS METHODS
CLARIFICATION ON MATRIX SPIKES FOR METHOD 8310
CLARIFICATION ON THE LEVEL OF SULFIDE FOR DETERMINING IF A WASTE IS HAZARDOUS UNDER THE REACTIVITY CHARACTERISTIC
CLARIFICATION ON WHETHER OR NOT A LABORATORY MUST USE THE "SW-846 'A' ORGANIC METHODS" WHICH WERE RECENTLY PROMULGATED
CORROSIVITY CHARACTERISTIC AS IT APPLIES TO SOLIDS
DEFINING IGNITABLE LIQUIDS METHOD
DEFINITION OF HOLDING TIME
DILUTION OF TEST SAMPLING
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING ISSUES
HOLDING TIMES FOR GROUNDWATER
INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION REQUIREMENTS IN METHOD 8240
ION CHROMATOGRAPHIC PROCEDURE FOR THE ANALYSIS OF HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM
ISSUES CONCERNING THE COMPARISON OF SFE EXTRACTION RESULTS TO THOSE OBTAINED USING SONICATION(3550) RATHER THAN SOXHLET(3540,3541)
LABORATORY EQUIPMENT USED TO RUN THE TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE (TCLP)
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS REGULATION OF CYANIDES
METHODOLOGIES EMPLOYED IN USED OIL SAMPLING
METHODS 1310 AND 1330: EXTRACTION PROCEDURE AND EXTRACTION PROCEDURE FOR OILY WASTE
METHODS 8240 AND 8260 DIFFERENTIATION AND EQUIVALENCY „•„„.„„.,,,
RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO USE PALLADIUM FOR GRAPHITE FURNACE ANALYSIS IN SEVERAL SW-846 METALS METHODS
REVISIONS TO THE TCLP
SELECTION OF NON-USEPA APPROVED METHODS FOR SUBPART X PERMITS
SW-846 FOR REQUIRED WASTE ANALYSIS PURSUANT TO 264.13 AND 265.13
SW-846, THIRD EDITION, HOLDING TIMES FOR SEMIVOLATILES
TCLP EXTRACTIONS APPLIED TO LIQUID WASTES, OILS AND SOLVENT-BASED PRODUCTS
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE DEFINITION FOR THE CHARACTERISTIC OF IGNITABILITY AS IT PERTAINS TO SOLIDS VS. LIQUIDS
USE OF PAINT FILTER LIQUIDS TEST TO DETERMINE FREE LIQUIDS IN A WASTE
USE OF THE METHOD OF STANDARD EDITIONS
VALIDITY OF METHOD 3060, HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM DIGESTION
SWMUS
(See Correction Action under Solid Waste Management Unit)
SYSTEM REMOVAL EFFICIENCY (SRE)
(See Incineration)
XREF
9481.1987(04)
9432.1987(123)
9523.00-14
XREF
9554.1991(04)
9445.1993(08)
9445.1987(04)
9442.1991(17)
9443.1992(04)
9445.1987(05)
9445.1992(01)
9442.1995(01)
9445.1993(02)
9441.1992(19)
9551.1995(01)
9445.1993(03)
9445.1992(02)
9443.1993(07)
9433.1994(01)
9443.1992(01)
9442.1991(05)
9445.1993(01)
9442.1991(04)
9443.1993(01)
9441.1992(14)
9445.1993(07)
9445.1993(05)
9445.1994(02)
9443.1986(10)
9554.1991(01)
9442.1991(11)
9443.1987(14)
9442.1991(06)
9445.1994(03)
9443.1993(04)
9442.1990(03)
9472.1985(01)
9445.1987(06)
9442.1991(14)
9443.1995(02)
9445.1993(04)
9443.1987(12)
9441.1992(05)
/ /
06/19/87
11/04/87
03/14/86
/ /
12/01/91
11/05/93
12/04/87
10/01/91
08/26/92
12/21/87
09/21/92
01/26/95
03/11/93
07/07/92
02/10/95
04/08/93
.12/22/92
11/08/93
10/12/94
03/09/92
03/27/91
01/21/93
03/25/91
01/18/93
06/03/92
, 09/02/93
04/29/93
03/10/94
05/05/86
01/08/91
07/09/91
08/11/87
05/09/91
03/10/94'
04/02/93
11/19/90
05/30/85
06/30/87
10/29/91'
08/24/95
04/19/93
06/23/87
03/06/92
XREF
XREF
-------
II ESS
M*
±
1 *!• IB
_
J (i:: ( it;; fia
:M !1 !« i ;!!R f?
Mi M
y V -•'-•- ; •- If
«; -,_"'' , -.- » , : .-.:'-
= 15,5 =*r , =5 is ,ws i=a =», pm r , IT £ Me f J I
i ; ~,i n
07/02/96:
= ! -
XEYHORD IWJBX
i ! \n I!
I
Page Ho
=
TANK ISYSTEM ~ ^
- - «
(See also Generators, ,SecondKry*Contain»enty '"P":J "i - ^
•CHANGES 0URIIW INTERIM STATUS ^ CORRBCTIOM j!
[I
11
•CHANGES TO INTERIM STATUS TANK! FACILITIES I
•GENERATOR CLOSURE/FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS FORiTANK^SYSTEMS, , ,: :
•INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT FOR TANKS AND POST-CLOSURE | I I i
•MANUFACTURING PROCESS UNITS
•POST-CLOSURE PLANS FOR HAZARDOUS HASTE TANKS F = r :
•SECONDARY CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTEiTTANKS = - .
•WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT DEFINITION 3 - 1 I
CLARIFICATION OF THE USE OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS TO CONTAIN HAZARDOUS WASTE =SPILLS
CONCRETE LINERS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE TANK SYSTEMS
CONTAINMENT AND DETECTION OF RELEASE FROM HAZARDOUS STORAGE TANK SYSTEMS (
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR REMOTE SECONDARY CONTAINMENT AREA FOR DIRECT OFFLOADING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE-DERIVED! FUEL: INTO A
SECONDARY CONTAINMENT FOR EXISTING HAZARDOUS WASTE TANK SYSTEMS « I ,i
SECONDARY CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS CERTIFICATION '.
STANDARDS FOR SECONDARY CONTAINMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TANK SYSTEMS
TANK SYSTEMS SINCE CHANGES IN DEFINITION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE, CLASSIFICATION OF i
TANK TREATMENT SYSTEM OF METAL-RICH RINSEWATERS
Ancillary Equipment ' •
CLARIFICATION OF THE REGULATORY STATUS OF A REFINERY DITCH SYSTEM = '
DRAINS AND TRENCHES ASSOCIATED WITH TANK SYSTEMS
HAZARDOUS WASTE TANK SYSTEM STANDARDS TO ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT AND EXEMPTED ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION SYSTEMS
INDEPENDENT ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS AND SCOPE OF THE TERM
LOADING/UNLOADING AREA IN THE DEFINITION OF TANK SYSTEM
OPERATED TO CONTAIN, DEFINITION
PRESSURIZED PIPING SYSTEMS WITH AUTOMATIC SHUT-OFF DEVICE? L
REGULATORY STATUS OF SHELL OIL'S NORCO, LOUISIANA FACILITY DITCH SYSTEM \
SEALED BELLOW VALVES USED IN LIEU OF SECONDARY CONTAINMENT FOR GLOBE VALVES
SEALLESS VALVE DEFINITION ;
SECONDARY CONTAINMENT FOR PIPING SYSTEMS I
SECONDARY CONTAINMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR ABOVE GROUND WELDED FLANGES AND SEALLESS VALVES
TANK SYSTEMS APPLICABLE TO PRODUCTION TANKS DURING CLEANOUT, PROCESS TRANSFER EQUIPMENT, AND HOSE LINES
TANK TREATMENT PROCESSES ! •
TANKS AND ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT DESIGN •
TEMPORARY TANK SYSTEMS USED IN RESPONSE TO EMERGENCIES, REQUIREMENTS FOR :
Empty ?
EMPTY CONTAINER RULE APPLIED TO TANKER OR VACUUM TRUCKS - - 4- - —
EMPTY TANK CARS THAT CONTAINED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT •
PESTICIDE DISPOSAL BY FARMERS AND CONTAINER MANAGEMENT
RESIDUES REMAINING IN EMPTY CONTAINERS, BURNING OF '-
TANK CARS AND DRUMS, DEFINITION OF EMPTY
UNRINSED CONTAINERS WHICH FORMERLY CONTAINED AN UNUSED FORMULATION OF PENTACHLOROPHENOL
Minimum Shell Thickness
HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT/STORAGE TANKS, PERMITTING
MINIMUM SHELL THICKNESS REQUIREMENT, WAIVER
TANK SHELL THICKNESS REQUIREMENT
Tanks ;
•APPLICABILITY OF SUBTITLE I
•CHANGES AT INTERIM STATUS TANK FACILITIES :
•COKE AND COAL TAR RECYCLABLE MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS l
—
XREF I
9528,1988(05)
5 9483.1988 (16)
3483.1989(01)
• 9483.1989(04)
9441.1989(54)
9476.1988(03)
" . ! ;> 9483.198'9(07)
i , « 9432. 198:8(05)
i ; , ! i! 9483. 1993 (01)
: ; : ft 9483. 1988 (04)
-'"> ! 19483.1988(10)
CEMENT KILN 19483. 1988 (02)
! 89483.1989(03)
'19483.1988(18)
! « 9483. 1989 (02)
'- 9483. 1988 (03)
"9483.1990(01)
===
l"
''-- .
i ii
/ i /:* ;
10/30/foi
09/30/8:8'
04/30/89,
10/30/89!
10/30/89;
04/30/881
11/30/89!
10/30/88!
10/07/93i
03/16/88!
06/03/88!
01/28/881
03/14/89!
12/12/88!
01/09/89!
02/08/88
• 08/01/90:
j :
-, » l
; K 9432. 1994 (02)!' 05/12/941
il
ffl!
ai
ss
Wi
•BE •
• I
,e,"
ffit
"s; s
CJ i
r,* i.
^;i
JS 1
jj{ "
ffl i
-1* ~
SBC* S
JrJ 1*
^J t
L-=^ l!
fesf
9483.1986(12)!! 12/30/86 f~ =
59483.1988(01)
£9483.1987(11)
! 01/27/88
• 07/20/87!
K 9483. 1988 (07)!! 03/17/88!
J 9483. 1989(06)
19483.1987(14)
: 19432.1994(01)
1 11/30/89!
i 08/03/87!
i 02/01/94!
c:
s»!i
ijj i
f ? , "
(^ ,
k 9483. 1986 (02)is 08/27/86! _ it ^
» 9483. 1987(18)!! 10/01/87' Nk
; j 9483.1987(10)ij 07/09/871
i *9483. 1987(17)
= 09/23/87:
29483.1986(11)!! . 12/19/86!
! 99483.1990(02)!! 08/15/90J
: s 9483. 1987(09)!! 06/25/8?!
«S(
^* »
II
A41:
? 9483.1987(04)=! 04/20/87! fl= ,
- i-!" - ji i r*™ »
i if
i "•
^4 t
- i *9441.1986(02)»' 01/07/86'
! »9441. 1985(41)
I 12/12/851
: ¥9457.1987(01)!! 03/25/87;
i,9441.1986(04)i! 01/07/86!
j 9441. 1984 (34)
69444.1986(03)
«9483. 1984(01)
49483.1983(05)
11/28/841
j 02/12/86|
, 02/23/84,
= 12/14/83,
; * 9483. 1983 (02)™ 04/20/831
V
: (9483.1988(05)
i 19528.1987(09)
1 '9441.1989(04)
) =
I 03/30/88!
1 08/30/87!
! 02/28/89!
^. -
Sri
IB*
•rfi
ij
]T;
tai *
HS<;
SS S
jjjj
|{
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 139
•CONTINGENT CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE PLANS FOR TANKS
*GENERATOR ACCUMULATION AND SECONDARY CONTAINMENT
"HAZARDOUS WASTE TANK - LEAK DETECTION
*HAZARDOUS WASTE TANK CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE
•HAZARDOUS WASTE TANK REGULATIONS
•HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS
•HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS
•HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS - AGE DETERMINATION
•HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS - EXISTING VS. NEW TANK
•HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS - INSTALLATION/CERTIFICATION OF SECONDARY CONTAINMENT
•HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS AND GROUNDWATER MONITORING
•HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS/CONTAINERS - CAPACITY OF SECONDARY CONTAINMENT
•INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS
•LEAK DETECTION REQUIREMENTS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS
•LEAK TESTING FOR EXISTING HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS
•MOBILE WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNITS
•RECIRCULATING TANK, REGULATION OF
•RELEASES FROM 90-DAY ACCUMULATION TANKS
•SECONDARY CONTAINMENT FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS
•SECONDARY CONTAINMENT FOR TANKS
•SECONDARY CONTAINMENT VARIANCES FOR TANKS
•TANK CLOSURE IN 1977 - RCRA APPLICABILITY TO
•TANK INTEGRITY ASSESSMENTS
•TANK REPLACEMENT
•TANK WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT DEFINITIONS
•TANKS HOLDING HAZARDOUS WASTE
•TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF USTs
•TREATMENT TANKS FOR LEACHATE OR LIQUID WASTES
•WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT/GENERATOR ACCUMULATION TANK
ACCUMULATION AND TREATMENT OF WASTES ON-SITE/PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DISPOSAL OF STORAGE TANKS
CONTAMINATED GROUND WATER AND VOLATILES FROM AIR STRIPPING, TREATMENT OF
CONTAMINATED SOIL AND DEBRIS TREATED REPLACEMENT UNDER A TREATABILITY VARIANCE
EVAPORATOR USED TO REMOVE WATER FROM HAZARDOUS WASTE
HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT/STORAGE TANKS, PERMITTING
K035 LISTING AND INCLUSION OF SLUDGES FROM BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF CREOSOTE PRODUCTION WASTEWATERS
MINIMUM SHELL THICKNESS REQUIREMENT, WAIVER
ON-SITE TREATMENT EXEMPTION, REINTERPRETATION OF
OPERATING DAY DEFINED FOR TANKS AND SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
PERMIT-EXEMPT STATUS OF SLUDGE DRYERS ADDED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNITS
PETROLEUM REFINING WASTES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR WWTUs
RD&D PERMIT FOR A SLUDGE DRYING PROCESS IN A WASTEWATER SYSTEM
REGION V FUEL-BLENDING FACILITIES CONCERNS
REGULATION OF FUEL BLENDING AND RELATED TREATMENT AND STORAGE ACTIVITIES
SECONDARY CONTAINMENT FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE TANKS
SLUDGE DEHYDRATION EQUIPMENT THAT IS PART OF A WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
SLUDGE DRYER ADDED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT-EFFECT ON WWTU EXEMPTION
SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR WASTE STREAMS - TANK RISK ANALYSIS
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNIT (SWMU) DETERMINATION
TANK AND SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT, DEFINITIONS
TANK CONVERSION FROM WASTE STORAGE TO FEEDSTOCK STORAGE - REGULATION
TANK INSPECTION PROCEDURES
TANK RULES APPLIED TO WWT UNITS AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS
TANK SHELL THICKNESS REQUIREMENT
TANK SYSTEM DESIGN-SECONDARY CONTAINMENT
TANKS USED FOR EMERGENCY CONTAINMENT
THREE AND FOUR-SIDED, FLOORED STRUCTURES, REGULATORY CLASSIFICATION OF
9483.1987(08)
9483.1986(10)
9483.1988(08)
9476.1986(02)
9483.1986(05)
9483.1987(07)
9483.1986(07)
9483.1988(12)
9483.1988(09)
9483.1988(13)
9483.1986(04)
9483.1988(14)
9483.1987(06)
9483.1986(03)
9483.1986(13)
9432.1987(05)
9483.1984(03)
9453.1986(05)
9483.1988(06)
9483.1987(13)
9483.1986(08)
9480.1987(01)
9483.1987(15)
9477.1988(03)
9432.1988(03)
9483.1987(02)
9483.1989(05)
9471.1984(01)
9483.1988(15)
9453.1986(01)
9483.1987(03)
9441.1986(86)
9551.1990(05)
9432.1987(03)
9483.1984(01)
9444.1987(52)
9483.1983(05)
9453.1987(08)
9483.1987(19)
9503.52-1A
9483.1990(03)
9503.51-1A
9441.1991(17)
9521.1994(01)
9483.1987(16)
9522.1988(02)
9432.1986(01)
9441.1986(25)
9483.1991(01)
9483.1983(01)
9483.1986(01)
9483.1983(03)
9483.1986(09)
9483.1983(02)
9483.1987(05)
9471.1984(03)
9432.1987(02)
05/30/87
11/30/86
05/30/88
09/30/86
08/30/86
05/30/87
10/30/86
06/30/88
05/30/88
06/30/88
08/30/86
06/30/88
05/30/87
08/30/86
12/30/86
06/30/87
11/30/84
08/30/86
04/30/88
07/30/87
10/30/86
05/30/87
08/30/87
07/30/88
03/30/88
03/30/87
10/30/89
03/30/84
07/30/88
04/16/86
04/08/87
11/20/86
10/09/90
05/01/87
02/23/84
12/11/87
12/14/83
12/15/87
10/16/87
01/02/86
09/20/90
12/24/85
11/04/91
10/17/94
09/11/87
03/07/88
01/06/86
03/26/86
01/04/91
04/08/83
08/13/86
09/21/83
11/28/86
04/20/83
05/29/87
09/06/84
04/02/87
-------
07/02/36*
M * PI
i : ii
: ! I!
KEYWORD IWDKX
i
i ! I
" TANKS-
TAX
TORPEDO PROPULSIOH UNITS SHIPPED;FOR RECYCLING, REGULATION OF ::
i;TOTAIiLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION AND ACCUMULATION PROVISIONS APPLICABILITY TO AH ASH TREATMENT FACILITY
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION FOR SCRAP METAL RECYCLER : ::
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION FOR WET-AIR OXIDATION UNIT(VERTECH) ' i ''
TREATMENT IN ACCUMULATION TANKS AND CONTAINERS ALLOWED FOR ALL GENERATORS SUBJECT TO 2fi2.34l ! i;
TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS HASTE FROM LARGE QUANTITY GENERATORS I ! l!
TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS HASTE IN A GENERATOR'S ACCUMULATION TANKS AND CONTAINERS
TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN GENERATOR'S ACCUMULATION TANKS j . j L
TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN PIPELINES LEADING TO A WASTEHATER TREATMENT PLANT
USED OIL TANK CLASSIFICATION : ; V-
HASTE STORAGE TANK ATTACHED TO FILTRATION UNIT
HOOD TREATMENT CYLINDER CREOSOTE SUMPS
(See Tank System)
i i
1::!!!' ! i
"t!
is-
(See RCRA/CERCLA Interface)
TCLP ;(TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC LEACHING PROCEDURE)
• (See Characteristic Hazardous Haste, Hazardous Waste Identification) I i
TEMPORARY EXCLUSION !
(See Delisting) ;
TEST METHODS • - ;
; h
(See also Analytic Methods, SW-846)
*SW-846 TEST METHOD 3060 L"
ANALYTES TO LOOK FOR WHEN PERFORMING RCRA ANALYSIS : i
ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR PETROLEUM REFINING RESIDUES AND WASTES \ -. '"
ASTM D4982-89 (METHOD B) AS AN EQUIVALENT METHOD OF TESTING FOR IGNITABILITY ' '
BLAST SLAG TESTING PROCEDURES I !
CALCULATION OF TCLP CONCENTRATIONS FROM TOTAL CONCENTRATIONS ' ' :
CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZATION - EVALUATION OF THE WASTE EVALUATION TEST
CLARIFICATION OF PRESERVATION TECHNIQUES FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS i i
CLARIFICATION ON ANALYTICAL QUANTITATION USING GC/MS METHODS i
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF TREATED WASTES - USE OF SW-846 METHODS, WASTE IDENTIFICATION, ,-;-..<
CORROSIVITY CHARACTERISTIC AS IT APPLIES TO SOLIDS : I Ph : ! r~
DIOXIN STANDARD USED TO TEST GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY COLUMNS, HANDLING OF ! : '£5/'. I ', i?
ELECTROPLATING SLUDGE, EXCLUSION PETITION ; jff'\ i : \S
HAZARDOUS WASTE TESTING ISSUES ' '"is ' ' 'r.
HOLDING TIMES FOR GROUNDWATER , '&, i = ! .S
ION CHROMATOGRAPHIC PROCEDURE FOR THE ANALYSIS OF HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM : : I I !i||
ISSUES CONCERNING THE COMPARISON OF SFE EXTRACTION RESULTS TO THOSE OBTAINED USING SONICATION<3550): RATHER THAN! SOXHLET(3:540,
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS TESTING AND RECORD KEEPING REQUIREMENTS t -,
LIQUID, FREE LIQUID, RELEASABLE LIQUID DEFINITIONS J
RCRA METHODS AND QA ACTIVITIES (NOTES) II
RCRA METHODS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES (NOTES) J
RCRA METHODS AND QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES (NOTES) ! >•
RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO USE PALLADIUM FOR GRAPHITE FURNACE ANALYSIS IN SEVERAL SW-846J METALS METHODS
SOXTEC EXTRACTION SYSTEM VS. SOXHLET EXTRACTION SYSTEM FOR PREPARATION OF PCB SAMPLES ;
SULFIDE REACTIVITY CHARACTERISTIC I
I
13541)
9441
9432
9432
9432
9453
94S3
9453
94S3
9441
9483
9483
9502
,1986(54)
,1987(p)
,00-1 !
,1986(06)
,1986(07)
,1991 (102)
.1986(08)
,1987(02)
,1986(62)
,1986(06)
,1983(04)
,1986(15)
ii i
Page Ko. 140 i
02/25/86
08/28/87
02/11/86
02/06/86
12/05/86
09/20/91
12/22/86
03/25/87
08/19/86
10/31/86
09/3:0/83
09/12/86
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
9443.
9442.
9445.
9443.
9442.
9445.
9442.
9441.
9445.
_9445,
9443.
9441.
9433,
9443.
9441.
9445.
9445.
9551.
9432.
9445.
9445.
9445.
9445.
9443.
9443,
1987(20)
1989(03)
1984(03)
1992(04)
1989(09)
1992(01)
1988(03)
1992(19)1
1993(03)1
1987(03al
1992(01)
1985(07)
1984(05)
1993(01)
1992(14)
1993(05)
1994(02)
1988(03)
1989(04)
1985(02)
1984(05)
1984(01)
1994(03)
1988(06)
1985(04)
09/30/87
04/20/89
05/25/84
08/26/92
11/03/89
09/21/92
05/02/88
07/07/92
04/08/93
11/17/87
03/09/92
02/13/85
12/11/84
01/18/93
06/03/92
04/29/93
03/10/94
05/13/88
07/20/89
04/23/85
12/20/84
04/23/84
03/10/94
05/31/88
07/16/85
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 141
TESTING REQUIREMENTS AND SOLIDIFICATION ISSUES UNDER LAND DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
USE OF PAINT FILTER LIQUIDS TEST TO DETERMINE FREE LIQUIDS IN A WASTE
VALIDITY OF METHOD 3060, HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM DIGESTION
Equivalency
DETERMINATION ON THE LEGALITY AND APPROPRIATENESS OF USING INCINERATION FOR TWO P078 WASTE STREAMS
Procedure
APPLICABILITY OF THE PAINT FILTER LIQUIDS TEST TO SORBENTS
CLARIFICATION OF THE CHARACTERISTIC OF IGNITABILITY AS IT PERTAINS TO SOLIDS VS. LIQUIDS
EXTRACTION PROCEDURE TOXICITY TEST
FLUFF ANALYSIS/SAMPLES
INAPPROPRIATE USE OF METHOD 1311 (TCLP) AS AN ALTERNATIVE EXTRACTION PROCEDURE
MULTIPLE EXTRACTION PROCEDURE, METHOD 1320 „.„„„
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE DEFINITION FOR THE CHARACTERISTIC OF IGNITABILITY AS IT PERTAINS TO SOLIDS VS. LIQUIDS
THERMAL TREATMENT
(See Subpart X) (See also Incineration)
REGULATORY STATUS OF SPENT FOUNDRY SAND UNDER RCRA
TNT
(See Hazardous Waste Identification)
TOLUENE
(See Listed Hazardous Waste)
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT UNITS
(See Exclusions, Treatment)
TOXICITY . .
(See Hazardous Waste Identification)
TRANSFER FACILITIES
(See Transporters)
TRANSPORTATION
(See Transporters)
TRANSPORTERS
(See also Generators)
*100-1000 Kg/MONTH GENERATORS
*DOMESTIC SEWAGE EXCLUSION
*EXPORT OF RECYCLABLE MATERIALS
*GENERATOR STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO TRANSPORTERS
*MANIFEST REQUIREMENTS FOR IMPORTED HAZARDOUS WASTE
'MANIFESTING REQUIREMENTS
•SIGNING THE MANIFEST AS AN AGENT WHEN IMPORTING HAZARDOUS WASTE
WASTE REQUIRE AN EPA ID NUMBER FOR TRANSPORT BETWEEN THE U.S. AND
-------
I ! Mil
i nil
Ml
! "I
07/02/56
KEYWORD IMDBX
1
DOT'S ROLE IN THB TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS HASTE
'EXPORT OF HAZARDOUS HASTES UTILIZEDIIF0R PRECIOUS METALS RECLAMATION
LABELING OF STEEL DRUMS NEED HOT INCLUDE PREVIOUS CONTENTS
MIXED HASTE REGULATION - RCRA REQUIREMENTS VS. NRC REQUIREMENTS
SATELLITE ACCUMULATION
I 1 II
Transfer Facilities i i m- < •
•ACCUMULATION TIME FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE IMPORTERS I i •! ! !
•EXPORT REQUIREMENTS FOR TRANSPORTATION THROUGH TRANSIT COUNTRIES , £;
•MULTIPLE GENERATOR LOCATION AND CONSOLIDATION : i t1 ;
•TRANSFER FACILITY AS CENTRAL COLLECTION POINT '• ! 7 -vl : \
CLARIFICATION OF REGULATION OF FUEL BLENDING AND RELATED TREATMENT AND STORAGE ACTIVITIES
GENERATION OF AIDS TO NAVIGATION (ATON BATTERIES)
HAZARDOUS HASTE RECYCLERS
REGULATION OF FUEL BLENDING AND RELATED TREATMENT AND STORAGE ACTIVITIES \ U =
REGULATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TRANSFER OPERATIONS ' i ^
STORAGE OF HAZARDOUS WASTE AT TRANSFER FACILITIES AND THE AUTHORIZATION OF STATES REGULATING THIS STORAGE -
TEN DAY REGULATION FOR TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
TRANSFER FACILITY REGULATION INTERPRETATION
TRANSPORTATION OF USED OIL TO LOCATIONS WHERE USED OIL CAN BE MIXED WITH CRUDE OIL
TRANSPORTERS MOVING HASTE FROM LARGE CONTAINERS TO SMALLER CONTAINERS AT TRANSFER FACILITIES
UNIFORM HAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFEST COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS
USE OF MULTIPLE TRANSFER FACILITIES AS PART OF THE "NORMAL COURSE OF TRANSPORTATION"
Transportation
•EXPORT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
•MANIFEST REQUIREMENT FOR TRANSPORTATION OF SPENT SOLVENTS
•MANIFESTING REQUIREMENTS AND EPA I.D. NUMBERS
BATTERY RECYCLING AND EXPORT
BULKING AND CONSOLIDATING SHIPMENTS OF COMPATIBLE WASTES WITH DIFFERENT HAZARDOUS CODES
BULKING OR CONTAINERIZING COMPATIBLE HAZARDOUS WASTES FOR TRANSPORTATION
CONSOLIDATION OF SHIPMENTS AND MIXING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE BY TRANSPORTERS
CONTAINERS FOR SAFE AND ECONOMICAL STORAGE, TRANSPORT, AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE, DEVELOPMENT OF
DESIGNATED FACILITY UNDER THE TREATABILITY STUDY EXCLUSION
•DOT'S ROLE IN THE TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
EXPORTATION OF MUNICIPAL WASTE TO CENTRAL AMERICA
EXPORTERS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TO MEXICO, RESPONSIBILITIES OF =
HAZARDOUS WASTE MARKING REQUIREMENT APPLIED TO STATE REGULATED WASTE
HAZARDOUS WASTE RECYCLERS
HAZARDOUS WASTES THAT ARE RECYCLED, HANDLING
INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT OF LAB SAMPLES
LDR RULES REGARDING ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT STANDARDS FOR LAB PACKS " -
MANAGEMENT OF WASTES PRIOR TO INTRODUCTION INTO SEWER
MARKETING OR BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL, NOTIFICATION OF
MOBILE RECYCLING UNIT FOR REPROCESSING WASTE SOLVENTS
PIPELINE TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
PROCESS WASTE DELISTED BY THE STATE DESIGNATES THE WASTE NON-HAZARDOUS WITHIN THE STATE -
RAW MATERIAL TRANSPORT VESSEL EXCLUSION FOR ALL WASTES GENERATED ON SUCH VESSELS
RCRA STORAGE FACILITY REQUIREMENTS, OFF-LOADING FROM TANK TRUCKS
RECYCLING OF MOLDING AND CASTING SANDS
REGULATION AND PERMITTING OF LABORATORIES
RESPONSE TO A REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION OF 40 CFR PART 262 REGARDING TRANSPORTATION OF RECYCLABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES
TRANSPORTATION AND DISPOSAL OF SHOCK SENSITIVE OR EXPLOSIVE MATERIALS
TRANSPORTATION REGULATIONS
TRUCK OR RAIL SHIPMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TO A POTW
UNIFORM MANIFEST FORM, USE OF CONTINUATION SHEET
-AS-FUEL RULES AT DOD FACILITIES, IMPLEMENTATION
1 1
j ;
B =
ii
j
||
I !
IM UN'
iiii Mi
I,* :
«(• i :M fi:
I'!' :'!
9163.1980(01)
9455,1991 (OiJ)l
9453. 1987 (OTiJi
9451. 1989 (02)j
9453.i989(07)|
9456.1992(01)1
9455.19,95(02)
9441.1987(32)1
9461.1991(01)1
9498.1994(13)1
9461.1987(03)1
9461.1988(01)!
•9521.1994(01)1
9461.1989(01)1
9461.1994(02)1
9461.1986(01)5
9461.1990(02)!
9592.1994(04)!
9461.1989(04)'
9452.1991(01)!
9461.1994(01)1
i
9455.1986(01)j
9541.1985(07)1
9452.1989(01)1
9497.1987(01)
9461.1985(01)1
9432.1990(02)1
9461.1983(01)'
9482.1985(01)1
9432. 1991 (01)i,
9463.1980(01)°
9573.1990(01)!
9455.1987(02)1
9453.1984(01)1
9461.1988(01)1
9441.1986(76)!
II! )•
i^ i i^
t Si 1 6 ^^
II i ii
Page Wo.f M2
1
06/18/80
02/05/91
11/17/87
06/26/89
07/13/89
08/31/92
03/31/95
04/30/87
11/01/91
12/05/94
07/30/87
08/31/88
10/17/94
01/03/89
08/17/94
04/10/86
10/30/90
06/09/94
07/20/89
07/26/91
06/21/94
09/30/86
05/30/85
12/30/89
02/12/87
09/19/85
03/01/90
01/30/83
11/26/85
09/27/91
06/18/80
02/16/90
06/15/87
05/18/84
08/31/88
10/08/86
9441.1989(20)j 04/27/89
^
9554Y1990(13):
9441.1986(73)?
9494.1986(01)1
9441.1986(30)1
9432.1986(08)1
9541.1986(04);
9441.1986(65)!
9488.1988(01)'
9441.1986(01).
9441.1988(39)i
9462.1994(01)!
9527.1992(01)1
9461.1990(01)!
9441.1986(88)1
9452.1987(02)1
9494,1986(02)!
11/20/30
09/25/86
02/09/86
04/16/86
04/30/86
03/03/86
09/03/86
12/09/88
01/06/86
08/30/88
11/09/94
11/03/92
06/07/90
11/30/86
04/30/87
03/19/86
102£
-------
OV/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 14 3
TREATABILITY STUDY
(See RCRA/CERCLA Interface)
TREATED WASTE
(See Treatment)
TREATMENT
*CONDITIONS FOR EXCLUSION OP PORTABLE TREATMENT UNITS
*SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS RECEIVING HAZARDOUS WASTE
*TREATMENT - TWO PARTS TO DEFINITION
"TREATMENT CAPACITY
"TREATMENT IN A GENERATOR'S 90-DAY CONTAINMENT BUILDING
"TREATMENT OF INFECTIOUS WASTE
ACCUMULATION AND TREATMENT OF WASTES ON-SITE/PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
AEROSOL CANS, ON-SITE DEPRESSURIZATION OF „,_,,,,,,.„.
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA REGULATIONS TO A HYDRO-MIST UNIT USED IN THE TREATMENT OF WASTEWATER AT DRY-CLEANING FACILITIES
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA USED OIL REGULATIONS TO USED OIL CONTAINED IN DISCARDED HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES
BULKING AND CONSOLIDATING SHIPMENTS OF COMPATIBLE WASTES WITH DIFFERENT HAZARDOUS CODES
CAPACITY VARIANCES AND UNDERGROUND INJECTION
CEMENT KILN DUST WASTE
CHEMICAL AGENT/MUNITIONS SYSTEM (CADMS) IS NOT TOTALLY ENCLOSED AND SUGGESTED RD&D-PERMIT
CLARIFICATION OF STATUS OF TREATMENT ASSOCIATED WITH FUEL BLENDING ACTIVITIES
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF TREATED WASTES - USE OF SW-846 METHODS, WASTE IDENTIFICATION
CONTAMINATED GROUND WATER AND VOLATILES .FROM AIR STRIPPING, TREATMENT OF
DECANNING AND CRUSHING OPERATIONS
DELISTING RESIDUE FROM TREATMENT OF LISTED WASTES
DETERMINATION ON THE LEGALITY AND APPROPRIATENESS OF USING INCINERATION FOR TWO P078 WASTE STREAMS
DIOXIN TRIAL BURNS FOR PURPOSES OF CERTIFICATION OR A RCRA PERMIT
ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE DUST AFTER ENCAPSULATION TREATMENT PROCESS
EPA'S DETERMINATION ON WHETHER MACROENCAPSULATION PROCESS ADDRESSES THE REQUIREMENTS OF 40 CFR SECTION 268.45, TABLE I
EVAPORATOR USED TO REMOVE WATER FROM HAZARDOUS WASTE
FOUNDRY SANDS RECYCLED AND RETURNED TO THE FOUNDRY
GRAY IRON FOUNDRY WASTE DISPOSAL
GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATED WITH HAZARDOUS WASTE LEACHATE
HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES, APPLICATION OF
HAZARDOUS WASTEWATERS USED AS QUENCHWATER IN CEMENT PRODUCTION
LDR DETERMINATION OF WASTE STREAM DILUTION
LEAD-BEARING WASTES TREATMENT STANDARDS
MIXTURES OF LISTED AND CHARACTERISTIC WASTES
ON-SITE TREATMENT BY GENERATORS UNDER 262.34
ON-SITE TREATMENT EXEMPTION, REINTERPRETATION OF
PCB DECHLORINATION TREATMENT PROCESS
PERMITTING OF TREATMENT ACTIVITIES IN A GENERATOR'S ACCUMULATION TANKS OR CONTAINERS
PERMITTING OF TREATMENT ACTIVITIES OCCURRING IN A GENERATOR'S ACCUMULATION TANKS OR CONTAINERS
PETROLEUM REFINERY WW, MIXTURE AND DERIVED-FROM RULES
RECYCLING PETROLEUM REFINERY OILY WASTES
REFRACTORY WASTES AT U.S. EPA COMBUSTION RESEARCH FACILITY
REGULATORY STATUS OF ABSORBENT MATERIAL WHEN MIXED WITH HAZARDOUS WASTE PRIOR TO INCINERATION
REJECT SUBSTRATES CONTAINING VENADIUM PENTOXIDE REGULATION UNDER RCRA
RESIDUE FROM SPENT SOLVENT RECLAMATION CONSIDERED HAZARDOUS
RESIDUES GENERATED FROM THE TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE, I.D. NUMBERS FOR
SOURCE REDUCTION
XREF
XREF
XREF
9471.1984 (02)
9441.1983(01)
9444.1990(01)
9525.1986(07)
9451.1992(01)
9432.1987(11)
9453.1986(01)
9432.1988(04)
9431.1994(01)
9592.1994(06)
9461.1985(01)
9489.1990(01)
9441.1988(36)
9432.1985(07)
9494.1992(01)
9445.1987(033)
9441.1986(86)
9432.1984(03)
9441.1981(05)
9554.1994(05)
9488.00-1A
9444.1986(33)
9554.1995(02)
9432.1987(03)
9441.1987(13)
9486.1981(01)
9441.1986(83)
9486.1985(01)
9489.1991(01)
9551.1990(06)
9554.1990(06)
9441.1987(68)
9453.1987(03)
9453.1987(08)
9441.1988(47)
9453.1986(04)
9453.1986(03)
9441.1985(29)
9441.1993(03)
9444.1988(05)
9441.1992(29)
9444.1986(17)
9441.1984(03)
9441.1986(05)
9454.1987(01)
/ /
03/30/84
02/01/83
01/30/90
12/30/86
08/31/92
09/30/87
04/16/86
09/30/88
06/02/94
07/11/94
09/19/85
08/30/90
07/29/88
11/19/85
11/27/92
11/17/87-
11/20/86 t;
04/26/84 =-
04/14/81
07/26/94
05/07/86
12/29/86
09/19/95
05/01/87
03/04/87
'06/18/81 .
11/13/86
03/27/85
02/15/91
10/14/90
06/25/90 -
08/19/87
07/01/87
12/15/87
11/07/88
07/25/86
06/17/86
08/23/85
,03/05/93
03/11/88
09/04/92
09/04/86
02/16/84
01/16/86
07/21/87
-------
I i
ii
!i 07/02/96
J-ii . .
!j!
I
i :
i
KEYWORD INDEX
II 1
i
i
i
i
-1
SPENT IROH SPONGE REGULATION AMD TREATMENT
STABILIZED HASTE PICKLE LIQUOR FROM STEEL/IRON INDUSTRY i
SUMMARY OF ASSISTANCE BRANCH PERMITTING COMMENTS
TANK TREATMENT PROCESSES i
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION APPLICABILITY!TO A BAGHOUSG SYSTEM
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION FOR SCRAP METAL RECYCLBR
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT FACILITY, REGULATORY CLARIFICATION OF
TREATING HASTES IN GENERATORS ACCUMULATION TANKS AND CONTAINERS
TREATMENT AS DEFINED IN 40 CFR 260.10 SUBPART B
TREATMENT IN ACCUMULATION TANKS AND CONTAINERS ALLOWED FOR ALL GENERATORS SUBJECT TO 262.34
TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE FROM LARGE QUANTITY GENERATORS
TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN A GENERATOR'S ACCUMULATION TANKS AND CONTAINERS J
sTREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN GENERATOR'S ACCUMULATION TANKS s ! ?- l
i TREATMENT RESIDUALS OF CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS HASTE AS A LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE ' '. i( I I
iUSE OF ON-SITE PRECIPITATION PROCESS AS AN ACCEPTABLE PRETREATMENT STEP ADJUNCT TO MERCURY RETORTING
IHASTEHATER TREATMENT SYSTEM, SOLVENT RECOVERY STILL BOTTOMS IN :
, i
Biological Treatment
TC RULE HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION
Chemical Stabilization
BULK LIQUID HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLIDIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
DRAFT SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN FOR NH PLATING COMPANY
LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS REGULATION OF CYANIDES "
LIQUIDS FOR WIND DISPERSAL CONTROL AT HAZARDOUS WASTE LANDFILLS, USE OF
ON-SITE TREATMENT OF MANHOLE SEDIMENT WHICH MAY EXCEED THE TOXICITY CHARACTERISTIC FOR LEAD
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS
Definition
BEVILL AMENDMENT APPLIED TO COAL GASIFICATION FACILITY
CLARIFICATION OF TREATMENT, AS DEFINED AT 40 CFR SECTION 260.10, AS IT RELATES TO HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL BLENDING ACTIVITIES
COMPACTING HAZARDOUS WASTE INSIDE STEEL DRUMS AS TREATMENT ,
PROCESSING LEAD ABATEMENT DEBRIS TO MEET HAZARDOUS WASTE RECYCLER'S SPECIFICATIONS IS NOT "TREATMENT" AS DEFINED IN 40 CFR 260.10
REGULATORY INTERPRETATIONS UNDER RCRA CONCERNING CERTAIN FUEL BLENDING SCENARIOS
TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN PIPELINES LEADING TO A WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
Drum Shredding Unit
DRUM SHREDDER REGULATION
Primary Treatment
SECONDARY SLUDGES FROM BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF REFINERY WASTEWATERS
Secondary Treatment
PERMIT-EXEMPT STATUS OF SLUDGE DRYERS ADDED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNITS
RDtD PERMIT FOR A SLUDGE DRYING PROCESS IN A WASTEWATER SYSTEM
SECONDARY SLUDGES FROM BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF REFINERY WASTEWATERS
SLUDGE DEHYDRATION EQUIPMENT AS A WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT
SLUDGE DRYER ADDED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT-EFFECT ON WWTU EXEMPTION
Solidification
ACCUMULATION AND TREATMENT OF WASTES ON-SITE/PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
BULK; LIQUID HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLIDIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
BULK LIQUIDS AND DRAIN/LEACHING FIELDS
DECHARACTERIZATION AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTES THAT HAVE UNDERGONE CHEMICAL SOLIDIFICATION
PCB-CONTAMINATED WASTES, STABILIZATION OF
TESTING REQUIREMENTS AND SOLIDIFICATION ISSUES UNDER LAND DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
i i
Page Wo. 144
!T
9443.1986(02)
9441.1990(16)
952&.o!0-17
94813.1990(02)
9432.1986(15)
9432.0B-1
9432.1983(01)
9453.1992(01)
9432.1984(05) "~
9453.1986(07)
9453.1991(02)
9453.1986(08)
9453.1987(02)
9441.1988(44)
9554.1993(01) :
9441.1985(43)
9441.1991(12)
9487.1987(01) I
9433.1990(06) i
9554.1991(01) I
9487.00-1A •
95531.1994 (01) :
9523;. 00-14 ;
|
9441!.1987(76)
943211995(02) i
- 9503.1991(01) !
9432.1994(03) j
!' 9498.1994(12)
! 9441.1986(62) |
m
9441.1988(28)
9441.1985(08) '•
-.
9503.52-1A
9503.51-1A
9441.1985(08)
9432.1987(08)
9432.1986(01)
9453.1986(01)
9487.1987(01)
9487.1986(09)
9493.1985(05) i
9487.1988(01) p
" 9551.1988(01) :
! f
01/17/86
06/19/90
09/02/88 I
08/15/90
12/22/86
02/11/86
02/18/83
07/21/921 L
11/26/84 i
12/05/86
09/20/91
12/22/86 !
03/25/87 1
10/27/88
06/03/93
12/17/85
07/31/91 i i
01/20/87
11/27/90
01/08/91
04/21/86
06/23/94 !
03/14/86 !
I
09/15/87! ' 1
10/12/95 '
05/21/91 i
10/07/94; 1 i
11/08/94 I
08/19/86 -,,\
: i
06/24/88
- i
02/22/85 !
-H
01/02/86
12/24/85
02/22/85
08/03/87!
01/06/86] : |
"
04/16/86 i
01/20/87
06/12/86 ;
12/13/85 . 1
02/03/88
05/05/88 j
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page Ho. 145
Totally Enclosed Treatment Units
ARMY CHEMICAL/MUNITIONS SYSTEM, REGULATORY STATUS OF
Treated Waste
TREATMENT WITHOUT A PERMIT - MIXING WASTE
REGION V FUEL-BLENDING FACILITIES CONCERNS
REGULATION OF OILY HAZARDOUS PETROLEUM REFINERY WASTE
TANK TREATMENT SYSTEM OF METAL-RICH RINSEWATERS
TREATMENT STANDARDS
(See Land Disposal Restrictions)
TREATMENT STORAGE AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES (TSDFs)
(See also Interim Status Process, Permit Process, Storage, Treatment, Land Disposal Facilities)
*LOCATION OF OPERATING RECORDS AT TREATMENT, STORAGE, AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES
*PRETREATMENT OF CHARACTERISTIC WASTES SUBJECT TO LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS
*TRUCK TRANSPORT OF WASTEWATER FOR PURPOSES OF SECTION 261.3 (a) (2) (iv) (A)
CLARIFICATION OF "DEFINITION OF FACILITY" AND PART A MAPPING REQUIREMENTS
EXCLUSIONS FOR PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS IN RCRA TSDF INSURANCE POLICIES, GUIDANCE ON
GENERATOR WITH RESPECT TO REGULATION OF OPERATIONAL WASTES FROM SHIPS, DEFINITION
LEAKS, SPILLS, AND ILLEGAL DISCHARGES OF LISTED WASTES TO SURFACE WATERS, MIXTURE RULE APPLIED TO
LOCATION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES
Active/Inactive Facilities
CLARIFICATION OF "ACTIVE MANAGEMENT" IN CLOSING WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES (SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS)
CORRECTIVE ACTION/PERMIT ISSUES - U.S. ARMY - ABERDEEN PROVING GROUNDS
DOD'S IRP PROGRAM AND RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION
= FACILITY TRANSFER/RECONSTRUCTION DURING INTERIM STATUS
MIXED WASTE REGULATION - RCRA REQUIREMENTS VS. NRC REQUIREMENTS
PERMIT ISSUES REGARDING ON-SITE TREATMENT BY FLUIDIZED BED INCINERATION
. RCRA CORRECTIVE ACTION PROCEDURES AND AUTHORITIES
RISK RETENTION GROUPS AND FINANCIAL ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
SATELLITE ACCUMULATION AREA AND REGULATIONS
SWMU CORRECTIVE ACTION RIA FACILITY DATA BASE
TRIAL BURN
(See Incineration)
TSDFs
(See Treatment Storage and Disposal Facilities)
U-WASTES
(See Listed Hazardous Waste)
UNDERGROUND INJECTION
(See also Land Disposal Restrictions, Corrective Action, Disposal)
*CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR UIC WELLS
•CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR UIC WELLS
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS TO CERCLA RESPONSE ACTIONS
BULK LIQUIDS AND DRAIN/LEACHING FIELDS
CAPACITY VARIANCES AND UNDERGROUND INJECTION
9527.1985(01) 11/19/85
9441.1986(453) 05/31/86.
9441.1991(17) 11/04/91
9493.1991(01) 01/08/91
9483.1990(01) 08/01/90
XREF
XREF
9475.1995(02)
9551.1990(03)
9441.1991(13)
9523.1993(01)
9477.00-6
9432.1986(05)
9441.1986(07)
9472.1991(01)
9484.1994(01)
9502.1986(09)
9502.1986(17)
9477.1986(01)
9451.1989(02)
9522.1985(05)
9502.1986(02)
9477.00-5
9453.1987(01)
9502.1987(08)
/ /
10/31/95
09/30/90
07/01/91
10/07/93
11/23/87
02/05/86
01/23/86
10/01/91
s
04/06/94
05/08/86 „
09/29/86 «•
01/03/86
06/26/89
12/13/85
01/31/86
11/23/87
02/22/87
08/11/87
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
9502.1986(07)
9527.1986(02)
9553.1989(02)
9487.1986(09)
9489.1990(01)
04/30/86
04/30/86
11/13/89
06/12/86
08/30/90
-------
p r
II
1 II
Hi
07/02/96
IIs;
i i i :
KEYWORD INDEX
11
CIASSIFICATIOW OP IMPIItfRATIQN GM.LBRIES i ! - i ± & , s=
DIOXIM-COOTJUtUNG HASTE RINSEATES, DISPOSAtlBY DEEP BELL INJECTION 1 = f S ij
LAND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS HASTES - USE OF NUCLEAR TEST SITES i = S i = =
PERFORMANCE AHD PERMITTING STANDARDS IN 3004(b), PROHIBITION OF PLACEMENT OFi HAZARDOUS HASTE IN SALT DOMES
i REINJECTION OF GROUNOHATER DURING AUTHORIZED CLEANUP ACTIVITIES I
THE EFFECT OF AN UPCOMING RULE ON NONHAZARDOUS UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL! WELLS AND ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION 'UNITS!
i TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION FOR HET-AIR OXIDATION UNIT(VERTECH) !
> UIC CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIREMENTS, IMPLEMENTATION I
UNIVERSAL WASTES I
r I .
i *LEAD-ACID BATTERIES AND UNIVERSAL HASTE =
; ; DETERMINATION ON HHETHER A GENERATOR'S FLUORESCENT TUBES ARE NONHAZARDOUS
UNIVERSITIES i
j
(See Generators) (See also EPA I.D. Number) I
UNSATURATED ZONE !
(See Groundwater Monitoring) j
UNUSED MATERIALS '.
(See Reclamation)
USE-CONSTITUTING DISPOSAL '
(See Recycle) ' 1
USED OIL |
(See also Burning and Blending, Hazardous Waste Fuels, Petroleum Refinery Hastes)
*BURNING/BLENDING OF UNUSED COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT (XYLENE) HITH USED OIL
•ENERGY RECOVERY ON-SITE CONSTITUTES REUSE FOR THE GENERATOR PROCESSING EXEMPTION
•MIXTURES OF USED OIL AND CHARACTERISTIC HAZARDOUS WASTE
•OFF-SPECIFICATION USED OIL FUEL
•RECYCLED USED OIL - TECHNICAL CRITERIA FOR LISTING, COURT DECISION
•USED OIL AS DUST SUPPRESSANT
•USED OIL FOR DUST SUPPRESSION/ROAD TREATMENT
•USED OIL MARKETER
•USED OIL STORAGE TANK BOTTOMS: HAZARDOUS WASTE OR USED OIL WHEN BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY?
•USED OIL USED FOR DUST SUPPRESSION OR ROAD TREATMENT
•USED OIL, DEFINITION OF
ATOMIZER MULTI-OIL FUELED HEATERS, INSPECTION AND CERTIFICATION CRITERIA FOR
AUTOMOTIVE FLUIDS, REGULATION OF
AUTOMOTIVE FLUIDS, STATUS OF
BOILERS USED IN GREENHOUSE OPERATIONS ARE INDUSTRIAL BOILERS
BURNING OF USED OIL
CLARIFICATION OF LANGUAGE IN THE PREAMBLE TO THE FINAL RULE ON USED OIL
DECISION NOT TO REQUIRE NOTIFICATION FROM GENERATORS WHO BURN SPECIFICATION USED OIL ON-SITE
HSWA PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF HAZARDOUS WASTE AS A DUST SUPPRESSANT
HYDRAULIC DEVICES CONTAMINATED WITH OIL DURING QUALITY CONTROL TESTING
LUBRICATING OIL CONTAMINATED WITH TCDD THROUGH USE AS AN ANALYTICAL STANDARD
METHODOLOGIES EMPLOYED IN USED OIL SAMPLING
MIXJj^HASTE REGULATION - RCRA REQUIREMENTS VS. NRC REQUIREMENTS
IIX^^A
i 1
i M |
i 1 =i
II i
- ' i ! J
i ni
I i
; 95021
1 !! 9444
! : 9480
9489
9522
-. . 9554!
9432
9502
1 :
; - ; ;
• ;! IXREF!
I ! i '9593>
:;9441
1 1
- -'
I i!
I ; IXREF
; i i =
I j! j
i i; :XREF
: ! i XREF
i i
= i -
; : . i; IXREF
, , :: 9442.
i I: 9495.
1 I1 9443.
• ! ' 9454.
19433.
! N9493.
i M 19441.
~l ~il9592.
I '• < 19592.
1 : ' 19441.
1 ; !9431.
: :9495.
1 9441.
1 9495.
' -; '9432.
9495.
-. ,: '9592.
: : ' '9495.
! l: 19493.
' ; 19495.
! ! 9444.
! 9442.
'. \ 9451,
i-" ii
1
. 1
II
II
l|
1!
p«
i;> , |
11 ]
~. = = :
II
i 1
AI992 (01)
1985 (14i)
i984 (Oil)
1985 (OH
1993 (01)
1994(02)
1986(06)
[00-3
f
!
11995(01)
1995(23)
i
l
j
!
! •
1985(01)
1994(01)
1993(02)
1986(02)
1988(02)
1985(06)
1990(08)
1988(01)
1994(11)
1990(09b)
1988(01)
1988(02)
1987(14)
1987(04)
1986(03)
1989(02)
1992(01)
1987(05)
00-1A
1986(20)
1987(48)
1991(11)
1989(02^
ji
; ;!
j!
Pag* Ko. 146
I
.j
02/04/92
09/10/85
OS/12/84
09/20/85
03/04/93
01/05/94
02/06/86
08/04/86 "
/ /
12/31/95
06/22/95
/ /
' '
' '
""//.-
12/30/85
05/31/94
02/28/93
02/28/86
11/30/88
12/30/85
03/30/90
" 02/25/88
09/30/94
03/31/90
01/30/88
09/22/88
03/06/87
03/06/87
01/09/86
10/17/89
07/08/92
03/26/87
05/31/86
08/22/86
10/23/87
07/09/91
.06/26/89
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. J47
PROPOSED PERMIT-BY-RULE FOR USED OIL RECYCLERS
REGULATION OF OILY HAZARDOUS PETROLEUM REFINERY WASTE
REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE MIXING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE SOLVENTS AND USED OIL
REGULATORY STATUS AND MANAGEMENT OF LIQUIDS AND ABSORBENT MATERIALS CONTAINING LIQUIDS
TC RULE DELAY OF IMPOSITION ON OIL FILTERS
TC RULE RELATIONSHIP TO USED OIL FILTER DISPOSAL
TWO WASTE OIL MANAGEMENT PRACTICES REGULATORY STATUS
USED OIL AND IDENTIFICATION OF LISTED HAZARDOUS WASTE „„„„„, ,,,„ ni^TMpn
USED OIL CONTAMINATION THROUGH NORMAL USE OR MIXING WITH HAZARDOUS WASTES - RECYCLING DEFINED
USED OIL DEFINITION APPLICABILITY TO OPEN-GEAR LUBRICANT
USED OIL DEFINITION TO OPEN-GEAR LUBRICANT "GEARITE"
USED OIL DESTINED FOR RECYCLING
USED OIL FILTERS - REGULATION
USED OIL FILTERS, REGULATORY DETERMINATION
. US!D OIL INTROSRINTOB^FIN|RY PROCESS UNDER HAZARDOUS WASTE DERIVED REFINERY FUEL PRODUCTS EXEMPTION
USED OIL TANK CLASSIFICATION
Do-It-Yourselfers (DIYERs)
««s.
HANDLE USED OIL
5£££$£%£Z£ SESSlS'SSSSS C^T=ERN THE RECYCLED USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS
INTERPRETATION OF THE REGULATORY EXEMPTION FOR BURNING USED OIL IN SPACE HEATERS
USED CRANKCASE OIL DISPOSED OF BY DO-IT-YOURSELFERS
Fuel
"•HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL .
*HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL BROKERS
*HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL IN INCINERATORS
*HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL MARKETERS
*USE CONSTITUTING DISPOSAL, RESIDUES FROM FIRE TRAINING EXERCISES
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS AND STORAGE STANDARDS FOR MARKETERS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
BEVILL AMENDMENT APPLIED TO COAL GASIFICATION FACILITY
BOILERS AND INCINERATORS, DISTINCTION BETWEEN/ INTEGRAL DESIGN STANDARD
BURNING CHARACTERISTIC OFF-SPECIFICATION PETROLEUM PRODUCTS FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
BURNING COMPRESSOR OIL WITH AMMONIA IN SPACE HEATERS
BURNING OF USED^OIL I^TH^MARINE INDUSTRY AND USED OIL GENERATOR NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
BURNING OFF-SPECIFICATION USED OIL FUEL IN GREENHOUSES
BURNING USED OIL AND THE LEAD SPECIFICATION
BURNING USED OIL GENERATED BY PRIVATE BOAT OWNERS ON-SITE
BURNING USED OIL IN SPACE HEATERS, INDUSTRIAL FURNACES, AND BOILERS
BY-PRODUCT CRUDE OIL TANK BOTTOMS
COAL TAR DECANTER SLUDGE WASTE PILE (TOLEDO COKE)
ENFORCEMENT POLICY ON WASTE BURNING FOR ENERGY RECOVERY
SS rBr^nru^'oR^S^otal havens, (REBUTTABL* PRESUMPTION,
INTERIM STATUS QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS TO HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL STORAGE FACILITIES, APPLIED
LUBRICATING OIL AND JET FUELS USED TO PRODUCE PETROLEUM PRODUCTS
MARKETING OR BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL, NOTIFICATION OF
MIXING HAZARDOUS WASTE WITH USED OIL (REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION)
NOTIFICATION BY BURNERS OF USED OIL WHO FIRST CLAIM THAT USED OIL MEETS SPECIFICATIONS
OFF-isPECIFICATION JET FUEL BURNED AS KEROSENE FUEL
FROM CO-BURNING OF ..SPECIFICATION" USED OIL FUEL AND VIRGIN FUEL OIL
SPENT SOLVENT RECOVERY, WASTE MANAGEMENT TAX
9495.1986(30)
9493.1991(01)
9441.1992(38)
9551.1993(04)
9441.1991(15)
9451.1991(03)
9495.1991(01)
9495.1990(01)
9441.1984(30)
9441.1990(33)
9441.1990(27)
9495.1987(06)
9441.1990(30)
9442.1990(05)
9495.1986(22)
9441.1986(11)
9483.1986(06)
9495.1986(03) 1
9592.1994(12)
9592.1994(03)
9592.1994(10)
9592.1995(02)
9441.1987(64)
9494.1986(03)
9454.1986(01)
9441.1986(87)
9453.1985(04)
9493.1985(04)
9494.1986(05)
9441.1987(76)
9432.1986(02)
9441.1986(95)
9494.1991(03)
9494.1986(053)
9495.1986(09)
9495.1986(05)
9495.1986(2.8)
9494.1991(04)
9495.1986(03)
9441.1986(37)
9441.1987(98)
9494.1986(06)
9494.1986(04)
9495.1986(08)
9528.1986(10)
9494.1985(01)
9494.1986(01)
9495.1986(04)
9495.1987(01)
9441.1986(19)-
9441.1986(22)
9592.1993(03)
9441.1986(41)
11/24/86
01/08/91
11/05/92
11/17/93
09/25/91
04/16/91
06/05/91
06/13/90
10/22/84
11/30/90
11/30/90
04/17/87
10/30/90
10/30/90
09/15/86
02/11/86
10/31/86
02/13/86
11/10/94
04/08/94
09/28/94
08/25/95
08/13/87
03/30/86
01/30/86
11/30/86
11/30/85
11/30/85
04/11/86
09/15/87
01/03/86
12/23/86
04/23/91
06/30/86
04/21/86
03/05/86
11/12/86
04/23/91
02/13/86
05/01/86
12/24/87
12/31/86
04/11/86
04/08/86
11/13/86
10/01/85
02/09/86
02/28/85
01/20/87
03/08/86
03/19/86
04/29/93
! 05/20/86
-------
!!' E -n- :! : >SIJ ii«t I i
1
111'1 11 i •«<•=« 11 t !U I' 1! >*! ' '« ' 311! "j !;• =«!!• " I
stji M hyHfiiic'iHi Ss i?:- !i! i *«? ;;:; i:'-r ;is ••& ; *
~^ v~: :r^ ; ir= ; .1^'",,, i: ~- ~ r -,~- ^: - ~ -- .-- ~--~:-— -:"~~ :- v — :-, - < " ^:~° ~% : * ~ ", % :
iliill i! J 1! a i1 ; I «= IB! ; » f H-;*ST-: • «• - -»• «
>1!N !| ilM ,JH |
07/02/9fi ,,"; "i "' "" , „ „,, KEYWORD INDEX . ._ .
I B 151! = j
: HSQG!!COMPIJAHCB "WITH! TC RULE >': i !';s '^S^ "v^^'S^ ~.:S> »: ri:s= ' ;
• : BUSED OIL AND OIL BEMINO HAZARDOUS iWA^E-DERaVEDiREFINERYKPROOUCrS i? ---._.
i OIL CONTAMINATION THROUGH NORMAL USE OR; MIXING HITH HAZARDOUS HASTES - RECYCLING DEFINED
i ^USED OIL! FIRED SPACE HEATERS 1 !
! OIL FUELS BURNED IN INCINERATORS ! ! :
! i OIL INTRODUCED INTO REFINERY PROCESS UNDER HAZARDOUS HASTE DERIVED REFINERY FUEL PRODUCTS EXEMPTION
- ^USED OIL.' BURNING OF OFF-SPECIFICATION FUEL - DUMPING
i ! •HASTE- AS- FUEL RULES AT DOD FACILITIES, IMPLEMENTATION i! i
! ! "HASTE-DERIVED FUELS BURNED IN CEMENT KILN, REGULATION OF '' '
: Management Standards , ; = :
: •REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION FOR USED OIL "
i APPLICABILITY OF PART 279 USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS TO THE OPERATION OF A VEHICLE1 'FLEET SERVICING OPERATION
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA USED OIL REGULATIONS TO USED OIL CONTAINED IN DISCARDED HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES !
: APPLICABILITY OF USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS TO ACTIVITIES INVOLVING SEPARATION OF USED OIL FROM SORBENT MATERIALS i
1 CLARIFICATION OF HOW PROVISIONS IN CERCLA APPLY TO "SERVICE STATION DEALERS" THAT HANDLE USED OIL "
i CLARIFICATION OF RECYCLED USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS AS THEY APPLY TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT ACTIVITIES ! ;
1 CLARIFICATION OF THE REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THE RECYCLED USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS i !
CLARIFICATION OF THE RECYCLED USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS
: CLARIFICATION OF THE RECYCLED USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS AS THEY PERTAIN TO IGNITABLE USED OIL 1
H i
~ Pag* Ko, MB
~
-9441. 1990 (26J 09/20/90
9495.1386(02) 01/11/86
= 5441.1984(30) 10/22/84
^9495.1986(21} 09/15/86
= 3495.19861(13) 06/27/86
i 15441.19861(11) 02/11/86
^;9441.i986:(40)! 07/31/86
I i 819494.19861(02)1 03/19/86
s l ~'9494.l!985!(03)(; 10/11/85
I |j j
: S'9592. 1992i(02) 12/31/92
, r,i ! BI9592.5J994K05) 06/10/94
f t" , B ,9592. 1,994 (06) 07/11/94
B fi! ; sBi9592.1994(09) 09/28/94
!" «"' ' S!9592.1994(12) 11/10/94
•! •:> i!9592.](994|(02)f 03/22/94
I" Isi ~!9592".1994j(08)r 09/12/94
-,, : ^19592. 1993:(06): 10/07/93
'- '--: 4i9592. 1993i(07)i 10/13/93
CLARIFICATION OF THE USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS AND HOW THEY APPLY TO USED OIL CONTAMINATED WITH HCFCs : = »• i ; t'asaz.iaajiiuz)! UI/UB/KJ
CLARIFICATION OF THE USED OIL REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO MIXTURES OF USED OIL AND CHARACTERISTIC WASTE t :' ';-- • 3,9592.1993 (05)i 09/24/93
CLARIFICATION OF USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS PERTAINING TO USED OIL GENERATED AND MANAGED ON-SITE r ' Mi: ;;a!9592.1993 (04) 07/28/93
1 CLARIFICATION OF USED OIL REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO USED OIL BEING RECYCLED AND USED OIL BEING BURNED IN AN INDUSTRIAL BOILERS ' j(]9494 .1994 (02) 02/08/94
- CLARIFICATION OF USED OIL RULES AS THEY APPLY TO DO-IT-YOURSELF OIL CHANGERS ' I SI9592.1994 (03) . 04/08/94
CLARIFICATION REGARDING THE "REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION" PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THE RECYCLED USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS V • ^19592.1994 (10); 09/28/94
INTERPRETATION OF THE REGULATORY EXEMPTION FOR BURNING USED OIL IN SPACE HEATERS ' ! ;r;9592.1995|(02) .08/25/95
1 RECYCLED USED OIL PROCESSING STANDARDS AS THEY APPLY TO ON-SITE RECYCLING OF USED OIL RECOVERED FROM A WASTtrtATER TREATMENT SYSTEM fp 5592 .1993!(08) 11/01/93
! REGULATION OF SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS UNDER THE SEPTEMBER 10, 1992 RECYCLED USED OIL MANAGEMENT STANDARDS ?!9592 . 19941(07) 07/22/94
REGULATORY STATUS AND MANAGEMENT OF DISPOSABLE AND LAUNDERABLE INDUSTRIAL RAGS AND WIPERS ^9441.19931(19)! 09/27/93
! i REGULATORY STATUS OF AND PROPER DISPOSAL METHODS FOR HYDRAULIC FLUID FILTERS USED IN AIRCRAFTS Si9444. 19941(01)1 01/12/94
! REGULATORY STATUS OF HYDRAULIC FLUIDS AND HEAT TRANSFER FLUIDS 1*ii9592.1993i(01)i 01/28/93
! REGULATORY STATUS OF USED CUTTING OILS AND USED OIL COATED STEEL TURNINGS GENERATED DURING MACHINING OPERATIONS S;9592. 19931(09)! 11/17/93
i TRANSPORTATION OF USED OIL TO LOCATIONS WHERE USED OIL CAN BE MIXED WITH CRUDE OIL " ^9592.1994(04)1 06/09/94
: ' USE OF ON-SPECIFICATION USED OIL FUEL AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR (t2 FUEL OIL IN MANUFACTURING ANFO BLASTING AGENTS J 9592.1994 (01)j 01/10/94
I Marketer • ; :
j *USED OIL MARKETER - DEFINITION "59495.1990(02)! 08/30/90
= ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS AND STORAGE STANDARDS FOR MARKETERS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE ^ 9494 .1986 (05)! 04/11/86
' HAZARDOUS" WASTE FUEL CADENCE PRODUCT 312, REGULATION OF i 9494 .1986 (04)1 04/11/86
i MARKETING OR BURNING HAZARDOUS WASTE FUEL, NOTIFICATION OF ^ 9494 .1986i(01)i 02/09/86
: USED OIL BURNED FOR ENERGY RECOVERY, INTERPRETATION OF SUBPART E ^ 9495 .1989l(01)L 05/15/89
| ' WASTE-AS-FUEL RULES AT DOD FACILITIES, IMPLEMENTATION Z- 9494 . 1986!(02)| 03/19/86
j Processor Requirements * - !
I ' CLARIFICATION AS TO WHETHER DEWATERING IS A PROCESS THAT TRIGGERS EPA'S USED OIL PROCESSOR REQUIREMENTS = 9592.1995 (01)' 08/10/95
i Used Oil Filters t
: REGULATORY STATUS OF USED OIL FILTERS 9441. 1;992!(35) 10/23/92
Waste Oil E •
1 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS PERTAINING TO THE MANAGEMENT OF WASTE SOLVENTS AND USED OIL "g 9441. 1992j(36)| 10/28/92
! USED OIL FILTERS ~ \ \-
: (See Used Oil) ~XREF i / /
[ i
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 149
VARIANCE
(See also Land Disposal Restrictions)
*LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS VARIANCES
*SECONDARY CONTAINMENT VARIANCES FOR TANKS
*SOLID WASTE VARIANCE FOR SPENT SOLVENT
*VARIANCE FROM A TREATMENT STANDARD
*VARIANCES TO BAN - EFFECTIVE DATES FOR SOLVENTS AND DIOXINS
BOILER VARIANCE FOR A WASTE HEAT RECOVERY BOILER NOT OF INTEGRAL DESIGN, DENIAL OF
CAPACITY VARIANCES AND UNDERGROUND INJECTION
CONOCO PART B PERMITS
CONTAMINATED SOIL AND DEBRIS TREATED REPLACEMENT UNDER A TREATABILITY VARIANCE
DETERMINATION WHETHER SECONDARY MATERIAL TRANSPORTED TO A CANADIAN COPPER SMELTER IS A SOLID WASTE
GROUNDWATER MONITORING VARIANCE REQUIREMENTS
K001, P093, AND U059 CONTAMINATED SOIL TREATMENT STANDARDS
NEUTRALIZATION SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, RETROFITTING VARIANCES
PERSONAL PROTECTIVE GEAR DISPOSAL
SECONDARY LEAD SMELTER VARIANCES
SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT (IS) RETROFITTING WAIVER REQUEST (OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL)
VARIANCES FROM CLASSIFICATION AS A SOLID WASTE UNDER 40 CFR 260.31 (b) FOR SPENT CATALYSTS
WASTES GENERATED IN MANUFACTURING PROCESS UNIT NOT SUBJECT TO LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS UNTIL REMOVED
VHS MODEL
(See Groundwater Monitoring, Delisting)
VOLUNTARY CLEANUPS
(See Corrective Action)
WASTE ANALYSIS
(See also Analytic Methods, SW-846)
*PH TESTING OF SOLID/WATER MIXTURE
*WASTE ANALYSIS FOR SIMPLE STORAGE AT INTERIM STATUS FACILITIES
*WASTE ANALYSIS PLAN
ASTM STANDARDS IN THE RCRA PROGRAM
CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE ISSUES FOR INTERIM STATUS SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
GENERATOR USE OF TOTAL CONSTITUENT ANALYSIS IN LIEU OF THE EP OR TCLP TESTS
LABORATORY EVALUATION PROGRAM
LIQUID WASTE, DEFINITION OF
METHODS 1310 AND 1330: EXTRACTION PROCEDURE AND EXTRACTION PROCEDURE FOR OILY WASTE
RCRA TESTING TECHNIQUES
SW-846 FOR REQUIRED WASTE ANALYSIS PURSUANT TO 264.13 AND 265.13
SW-846, THIRD EDITION, HOLDING TIMES FOR SEMIVOLATILES
TCLP IN THE LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS PROGRAM AND HAZARDOUS WASTE IDENTIFICATION PROGRAM
TOTAL CONSTITUENT ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE HAZARDOUS CHARACTERISTICS OF WASTE SAMPLE
USE OF THE METHOD OF STANDARD EDITIONS
WASTE ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS IN INCOMING WASTE SHIPMENTS - LDR
WASTE BURNING
(See Incineration)
WASTE EXCHANGE PROGRAM
(See Waste Minimization)
XREF
9551.
9483.
9433.
9433,
9551.
9433.
9489,
9553.
9551,
9441,
9481.
9554.
9484.
9441,
9444,
9484.
9433,
9441.
1986(19)
1986(08)
1985(03)
1986(24)
1986(22)
1987(01)
1990(01)
1990(01)
1990(05)
1995(24)
1985(03)
1990(09)
1986(04)
1990(15)
1988(14)
1987(07)
1994(02)
1987(53)
XREF
XREF
XREF
9443.
9472.
9472.
9445.
9476.
9451.
9472,
9432,
9443,
9445,
9472,
9445,
9443,
9443,
9443,
9551,
1983(03)
1983(01)
1985(02)
1987(05)
1987(08)
1986(03)
1986(02)
1981(01)
1987(14)
1987(03)
1985(01)
1987(06)
1987(29)
1987(33)
1987(12)
1987(10)
10/30/86
10/30/86
09/30/85
12/30/86
12/30/86
01/07/87
08/30/90
05/11/90
10/09/90
06/30/95
10/28/85
08/13/90
04/21/86
06/14/90
08/26/88
07/14/87
11/15/94
06/29/87
I I
02/28/83
07/30/83
03/31/85
12/21/87
12/17/87
04/28/86
01/29/86
06/28/81
08/11/87
10/20/87
05/30/85
06/30/87
11/18/87
12/31/87
06/23/87
06/12/87
XREF
XREF
-------
|l !!
I 1
KEYWORD INDEX
HASTE MINIMIZATION
(See also Generators, HSHA, Manifest)
*RCRA WASTE MINIMIZATION REQUIREMENTS i j | ] - = •
*HASTE MINIMIZATION ! - = = s • "
: *HASTE MINIMIZATION AND RECYCLING ACTIVITIES THAT RESEMBLE CONVENTIONAL HASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICE _ _ _
I *HASTE MINIMIZATION PROGRAM ACTIVITIES , 111
r "WASTE MINIMIZATION REQUIREMENTS -
! EFFECTS OF THE SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR RULE ON VARIOUS GENERATOR HASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
i IMPACT OF DRAFT HAZARDOUS WASTE MINIMIZATION AND COMBUSTION STRATEGY ON OHIO'S REGIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF AIR REGULATIONS
I MANIFEST CERTIFICATION SIGNATURE BLOCK FOR EMPLOYEES SIGNING FOR GENERATING COMPANY
! MODIFIED MANIFEST WASTE MINIMIZATION CERTIFICATION FOR SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORS i , H
; ON-SITE RECYCLING OF SPENT SOLVENTS BY GENERATORS ; !j
! SLUDGE DRYER ADDED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT-EFFECT ON WWTU EXEMPTION ; : l!
! SOURCE REDUCTION : : !;
' SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS '. ! "
WASTE MINIMIZATION AND INCLUSION OF RECYCLING ::
WASTE MINIMIZATION CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS ••
; WASTE MINIMIZATION REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 3002 (b) OF RCRA FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES ':
I WASTE MINIMIZATION: PERMIT CERTIFICATION AND JOINT PERMITTING : : "'
WASTE OIL
(See Used Oil) (See also Hazardous Waste Identification)
WASTE PILES
(See Land Disposal Facilities)
WASTE STREAM
*LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - CORROSIVE WASTE
*TREATMENT CAPACITY
DERIVED FROM/MIXTURE RULE APPLICATION TO REFINERY WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS i
EPA'S INTERPRETATION OF THE EXEMPTION IN 40 CFR 261.3 (a) (2) (iv) (F), A NEW SECTION OF EPA'S REGULATIONS ON CARBAMATE LISTING RULE
IMMERSION PLATING WASTEWATERS-BRONZE PLATING
LDR DETERMINATION OF WASTE STREAM DILUTION
METHANOL RECOVERY SYSTEM - CLARIFICATION OF HASTE STATUS
MIXTURES OF LISTED AND CHARACTERISTIC WASTES
r - OIL FIELD OPERATIONS, EXEMPTIONS FOR CERTAIN ..._..
SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR WASTE STREAMS - TANK RISK ANALYSIS
SOLVENT AND COMMERCIAL CHEMICAL PRODUCT WASTE STREAMS
WASTE-AS-FUEL
(See Hazardous Waste Fuels)
WASTE-DERIVED FUEL
(See Hazardous Waste Fuels)
||, WASTEWATER
Page Wo. ISO
1 _ i
XREF I I
9561,1935(01)1
9451.1985(03)"
9561.1994(02).
9431,1987(02J1
9431.1987(01).
9451,1986(01)1
9573.1994(01) =
9452,1985(02)1
9452.1986(02) =
9441.1986(21J =
9432,1986(01)!
9454.1987(01) =
9523J.OO-12 •
9452.1986(03)
9452;. 1986 (01)'=
9561.1994(01);
9560,1985(01) =
=
XREF ."
! ;s£
;«
it;
XREF; =3
|; jj
1= -I
XREFi i*
9551'. 1987(19)11
9525.1986(07)15
9441. 1987 (70)!E
9441.1995(25)11
9442.1988(05)1*
9551.1990(06)il
9441. 1987 (46);t
9441.1987(68)11
9441.1989(27)!*
9441.1986(25)18
9444.1989(03)11
- . ' ' i 1!
/ / i i
06/30/95 i i
10/30/85 ! !
07/31/94 i ;
06/30/87 ! !
06/30/87 -, ;
03/17/86 i
01/10/94 !
10/17/85 ; i
10/20/86 ; i
03/13/86 i i
01/06/86 ! i i
07/21/87 i I
03/30/87 l •
02/06/86 i
04/28/86 i . :
07/18/94 ; ' i
09/11/85 i i
i i
ti' ! i
;
/ / !
i
i i
/ / i i
09/30/87 ' !
12/30/86 : I
08/28/87 i ii
.08/03/95 i 1!
10/03/88 = •
,10/14/90 ! : i
06/17/87 1 '
08/19/87 ! ! !
06/06/89 ! t-J
03/26/86 1 B
06/28/89 : !
III
(See also Clean Water Act, Listed Hazardous Waste, Land Disposal Restrictions, Mixure Rule)
*BDAT FOR WASTEWATER
XREF
XREF
XREF
9432.1986(16)1
/ /
12/30/86
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 151
*MIXTORE RULE - DISCHARGES TO WASTEWATER
ACLs PROPOSED BY UNION CARBIDE CORP., INSTITUTE, WV, COMMENTS ON
ANTARCTICA WASTE DISPOSAL PRACTICES
CARBON REGENERATION FACILITY, MIXTURE OF SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTES (CALGON)
DISCARDED WASTEWATER AT A CORROSION CONTROL FACILITY
EXEMPTION FOR WASTEWATER DISCHARGES AND GENERATOR ACCUMULATION PROVISIONS
HAZARDOUS WASTEHATERS USED AS QUENCHWATER IN CEMENT PRODUCTION
LAND DISPOSAL OF SOLVENTS
REACTOR VESSEL WASHOUT CONTAINING TRACE AMOUNTS OF SOLVENT
SAMPLING LOCATION IN A SEPARATOR - THICKENER TREATMENT TRAIN AND THE MIXTURE RULE
SLUDGE DRYER ADDED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT-EFFECT ON WWTU EXEMPTION
SOLVENT LISTINGS, SCOPE OF
SOLVENT-CONTAMINATED WASTESTREAMS FROM A PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURER
SOLVENT-CONTAMINATED WASTEWATER FROM FRAGRANCE MANUFACTURE
, TANK TREATMENT PROCESSES
' WASTES COVERED UNDER THE DIOXIN LISTING
WASTES GENERATED IN A PROCESS USING METHYLENE CHLORIDE TO RECOVER ALKALOIDS FROM PLANT MATTER
WASTEWATERS EXCLUSION FROM THE DEFINITION OF F021 FOR PCP MANUFACTURE
WOOD PRESERVING AND SURFACE PROTECTION FACILITIES, CONTROLLING ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES FROM
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA REGULATIONS TO A HYDRO-MIST UNIT USED IN THE TREATMENT OF WASTEWATER AT DRY-CLEANING FACILITIES
EPA'S INTERPRETATION OF THE EXEMPTION IN 40 CFR 261.3 (a) (2) (iv) (F) , A NEW SECTION OF EPA'S REGULATIONS ON CARBAMATE LISTING RULE
INTERPRETATION OF INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER DISCHARGE EXCLUSION FROM THE DEFINITION OF SOLID WASTE
NPDES Facilities
*APPLICABILITY OF THE SECTION 261.4 (a) (2) EXCLUSIONS
*TRUCK TRANSPORT OF WASTEWATER FOR PURPOSES OF SECTION 261. 3 (a) (2) (iv) (A)
EXEMPTION FROM PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS FOR WASTE WATER TREATMENT UNITS
LEAKS, SPILLS, AND ILLEGAL DISCHARGES OF LISTED WASTES TO-SURFACE WATERS, MIXTURE RULE APPLIED TO
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR ZERO WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM
RCRA REGULATORY INTERPRETATION ON BENZENE STRIPPERS AT WRC REFINERY
TC RULE HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION
POTW
EFFECTS OF THE SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR RULE ON VARIOUS GENERATOR WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
MANAGEMENT OF WASTES PRIOR TO INTRODUCTION INTO SEWER
MIXED RADIOACTIVE HOSPITAL WASTES AND THE DOMESTIC SEWAGE EXCLUSION
PROPER DISPOSAL OF OLD MEDICATIONS
REGULATORY STATUS AND MANAGEMENT OF DISPOSABLE AND LAUNDERABLE INDUSTRIAL RAGS AND WIPERS
TRUCK OR RAIL SHIPMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TO A POTW
WASTES GENERATED FROM EXTRACTION PROCESS
Sewage Sludge
DOMESTIC SEWAGE SLUDGE EXCLUSION
REGULATORY STATUS AND MANAGEMENT OF DISPOSABLE AND LAUNDERABLE INDUSTRIAL RAGS AND WIPERS
RESIDUALS GENERATED BY PROCESS FOR SEWAGE SLUDGE TREATMENT
Sludge
*API SEPARATOR WASTEWATER AND SLUDGE
*F019 LISTING APPLICABILITY TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES
*SLUDGES WHEN RECLAIMED, REGULATION OF
•CLARIFICATION OF THE REGULATORY STATUS UNDER RCRA OF SILVER RECOVERY UNITS USED IN PHOTO PROCESSING
CLASSIFICATION OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE FROM THE REVISED "ZINC-COBALT ALLOY PLATING ON CARBON STEEL" PROCESS
F019 LISTING AND THE CONVERSION COATING PROCESS
INDUSTRIAL PLATING OPERATIONS, STATUS OF VARIOUS WASTES FROM
INTERPRETATION REGARDING THE REGULATORY STATUS OF SILVER RECOVERY UNITS UNDER RCRA REGULATIONS f
9522.1987(02)
9481.1987(04)
9442.1989(04)
9441.1986(33)
9444.1991(05)
9441.1987(96)
9489.1991(01)
9453.1987(09)
9444.1987(49)
9433.1986(11)
9432.1986(01)
9444.1986(26)
9441.1988(49)
9442.1987(06)
9483.1990(02)
9444.1986(23)
9441.1986(52)
9444.1987(39)
9441.1986(28)
9431.1994(01)
9441.1995(25)
9441.1995(05)
9441.1987(84)
9441.1991(13)
9522.1992(01)
9441.1986(07)
9471.1989(01)
9489.1992(02)
9441.1991(12)
9451.1986(01)
9441.1986(73)
9441.1986(94)
9574.1990(01)
9441.1993(19)
9441.1986(88)
9442.1986(07)
9441.1990(02)
9441.1993(19)
9442.1988(01)
9444.1984(06)
9441.1989(53)
9441.1986(59)
9441.1995(26)
9441.1994(20)
9444.1987(22)
9441.1988(50)
9441.1994(28)
12/30/87
06/19/87
04/26/89
04/23/86
11/26/91
12/10/87
02/15/91
12/10/87
10/26/87
04/24/86
01/06/86
11/07/86
12/06/88
10/26/87
08/15/90
10/21/86
07/02/86
09/02/87
04/07/86
06/02/94
08/03/95
02/17/95
10/31/87
07/01/91
01/16/92
01/23/86
03/20/89
08/27/92
07/31/91
03/17/86
09/25/86
12/19/86
11/28/90
09/27/93
11/30/86
07/02/86
02/12/90
09/27/93
02/10/88
04/30/84
10/30/89
06/30/86
08/04/95
08/02/94
06/24/8?
12/07/88
10/05/94
-------
I Mi
07/02/S&
III 1
imiiiiiiii ill Mi if
...,.„,.,„
11 : • I I il B I! !'! !ll! I !!
Ill i
III 1
im
OILY
1
M il
II
KEVHORD IM'DEX
M
!S "' II
1 IT
BASTEHATBR iTREATMENTI PWDSJ, I PERMITTING COVERAGE OF '
REGULATORY STATUS OF NON-LISTED SLUDGE THAT IS BEIMG RECYCLED : I
REGULATORY STATUS OF HASTEHATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ZIRCONIUM PHOSPflATIHGl OFi ALOMIHOMilCANS !
REINTERPRETATION OF THE F006 LISTING , '
SUMMARY OF PERMIT ASSISTANCE TEAM (PAT) COMMENTS !
TOTALLY ENCLOSED TREATMENT EXEMPTION FOR SCRAP METAL RECYCLER '
ZINC OXIDE DUST RECLAIMED OR USED AS FERTILIZER
III
I i
i
1
I I
I
i
:I
I I
III
Ii
I
I
Hastewater Treatment :
*APPLICABILITY OF THE SECTION 261.4(a)(2) EXCLUSIONS ! \
*F019 LISTING APPLICABILITY TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES ' '
*FILTER PRESS IN HASTEWATBR TREATMENT UNIT, EXCLUSION FOR ! F '.
•MOBILE WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNITS - ! i
•STATUS OF WHTU3/ENU3 AT GENERATOR SITES • !
*TANK HASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT DEFINITIONS ; i I
*HASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT DEFINITION . I '
*HASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT/GENERATOR ACCUMULATION TANK - ! !
•WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNITS: REGULATORY STATUS OF HASTE r
*ZERO DISCHARGE AT FACILITIES AND SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, RCRA EXCLUSION, CWA APPLIES 'I M > " ; ! M " ! : f« '
APPLICABILITY OF RCRA REGULATIONS TO A HYDRO-MIST UNIT USED IN THE TREATMENT OF WASTEWATER AT pRY-CLEANING FACILITIES .
DERIVED FROM/MIXTURE RULE APPLICATION TO REFINERY HASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS :
F019 LISTING AND THE CONVERSION COATING PROCESS ' ' ! _
FILTER PRESS PROPOSED AS PART OF CORRECTIVE ACTION - NOT EXCLUDED FROM PERMITTING I ! !
INTERPRETATION OF THE MIXTURE RULE EXEMPTION AS IT RELATES TO SCRUBBER WATER FROM THE INCINERATION OF CERTAIN SOLVENTS
LDR DETERMINATION OF WASTE STREAM DILUTION
MODIFICATIONS TO WASTEHATER TREATMENT SYSTEM UNDER EXCLUSION
OIL/WATER EMULSIONS GENERATED BY PETROLEUM REFINERY WH SYSTEMS-K049 HASTE
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR ZERO WASTEHATER TREATMENT SYSTEM
PERMIT REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO ON-SITE TREATMENT AND WASTEHATER TREATMENT UNIT EXEMPTIONS
PERMIT-EXEMPT STATUS OF SLUDGE DRYERS ADDED TO HASTEHATER TREATMENT UNITS
PESTICIDE RINSEATE TREATMENT/RECYCLING SYSTEM
PETROLEUM REFINERY WW, MIXTURE AND DERIVED-FROM RULES
PETROLEUM REFINING WASTES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR WWTUs
RD&D PERMIT FOR A SLUDGE DRYING PROCESS IN A WASTEWATER SYSTEM
REGULATORY INTERPRETATION REGARDING PHOTORESIST SOLIDS ("SKINS") GENERATED IN THE PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO TWO HASTE STREAMS THAT WOULD BE BILAYERED THROUGH PHASE SEPARATION AT A LICENSED TSDF
REGULATORY STATUS OF A DISSOLVED AIR FLOATATION FLOAT STORAGE TANK USED TO FEED MATERIAL INTO A PETROLEUM COKER
REGULATORY STATUS OF NON-LISTED SLUDGE THAT IS BEING RECYCLED
REGULATORY STATUS OF SEPARATOR WATER AND EVAPORATOR UNITS AT DRY CLEANERS
REGULATORY STATUS OF SEPARATOR WATER AND THE USE OF SEPARATOR WATER EVAPORATORS AT DRY-CLEANING FACILITIES
REGULATORY STATUS OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ZIRCONIUM PHOSPHATING OF ALUMINUM CANS
SECONDARY SLUDGES FROM BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF REFINERY WASTEWATERS
SLUDGE DEHYDRATION EQUIPMENT
SLUDGE DEHYDRATION EQUIPMENT AS A WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT
SLUDGE DEHYDRATION EQUIPMENT THAT IS PART OF A WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
SLUDGE DRYER ADDED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT-EFFECT ON WWTU EXEMPTION
TANK RULES APPLIED TO WWT UNITS AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS
TORPEDO PROPULSION UNITS SHIPPED FOR RECYCLING, REGULATION OF
TREATMENT OF HAZARDOUS WASTE IN PIPELINES LEADING TO A WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
WASTE ACID AS WASTEWATER CONDITIONER AND AS INGREDIENT IN FERTILIZER
WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND ELEMENTARY NEUTRALIZATION UNITS EXEMPTION
WASTEWATER TREATMENT EFFLUENT FROM PROCESSES THAT GENERATE K001 AND F006 WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE EXEMPTION FOR ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM WOOD PRESERVING PROCESSES USING CREOSOTE AND/OR PENTACHLOROPHENOL
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM, SOLVENT RECOVERY STILL BOTTOMS IN
WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT EXEMPTION
WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNIT EXEMPTION/DEFINITION
1ASTEWA1
Page Ho. 152
9502.1984(01)
9441.19941(17)
9442.1989:(01)
9444.1986(19)
9523.00-12
9432.00-1
9441.1987(61)
12/07/84
06/10/94
01/01/89
09/25/86
03/30/87
02/11/86
08/12/87
9441.1987(84)
9441.1989(53)
9432.1984(04)
9432.1987(05)
9432.1995(01)
9432.1988(03)
9432.1988(05)
9483.1988(15)
9441.1992(18)
9441.1984(14)
9431.1994(01)
9441.1987(70)
9444.1987(22)
9433.1987(10)
9441.1994(16)
9551.1990(06)
9441.1991(01)
9441.1984(35)
9471.1989(01)
9522.1988(04)
9503.52-1A
9471.1988(04)
9441.1985(29)
9483.1990(03)
9503.51-1A
9443.1994(04)
9441,1994(27)
9441.1993(21)
9441.1994(17)
9471.1993(01)
9432.1993(02) f
9442.1989(01)
9441.198S(08)~
9527.1987(02)
9432.1987(08)
9522.1988(02)
9432.1986(01)
9483.1986(09)
9441.1986(14)
9441.1986(62)
9441.1986(80)
9471.1987(02)
9444.1984(10)
9441.1986(29)
9444.1984(04) "
9441.1985(43)
9431.1989(02)
9432.1984(07)
10/31/87
10/30/89
05/30/84
06/30/87
02/28/95
03/30/88
10/30/88
07/30/88
06/30/92
05/30/84
06/02/94
08/28/87
06/24/87
06/12/87
06/10/94
10/14/90
01/03/91
12/07/84
03/20/89
11/02/88
01/02/86
10/27/88
08/23/85
09/20/90
12/24/85
07/12/94
10/04/94
11/01/93
06/10/94
06/02/93
10/22/93
01/01/89
02/22/85
08/03/87
08/03/87
03/07/88
01/06/86
11/28/86
02/25/86
08/19/86
10/20/86
12/21/87
07/25/84
04/09/86
04/26/84
12/17/85
09/26/89
12/24/84
;.
|
i
i
;
-
1
=
I
=
;
:
;
I
=
-
=
=
1
=
-
1
i
:
!
I
:
I
:
t
-f
-
-
1
-
-
-
=
-
i
i
I
-------
07/02/96
KEYWORD INDEX
Page No. 153
WASTEWATER TREATMENT UNITS ARE NOT DESIGNATED FACILITIES AND MAY NOT RECEIVE OFF-SITE HAZARDOUS WASTES
WASTEWATER TREATMENT
(See Wastewater)
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE
(See Listed Hazardous Waste)
WELL CONSTRUCTION
(See Groundwater Monitoring)
WITHDRAWALS
(See Permit Application)
WOOD PRESERVING
(See Wood Treatment)
WOOD TREATMENT
(See also Listed Hazardous Waste)
Creosote
*RECLAIMED COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS: REGULATORY STATUS
CREOSOTE TREATED CROSS TIES, DISPOSAL OF, FIFRA INTERFACE
CREOSOTE TREATED CROSS-TIES DISPOSAL
K035 LISTING AND INCLUSION OF SLUDGES FROM BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF CREOSOTE PRODUCTION WASTEWATERS
RAILROAD TIES AS HAZARDOUS WASTES UNDER THE MIXTURE RULE, SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR
REGULATORY STATUS OF VARIOUS TYPES OF PENTACHLOROPHENOL WASTES
WOOD PRESERVING AND SURFACE PROTECTION FACILITIES, CONTROLLING ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES FROM
WOOD TREATED WITH CREOSOTE, DISPOSAL OF
Wood Preserving
•RECLAIMED SPENT WOOD PRESERVATIVE EXCLUSION IN 261.4 (a) (9)
*UNUSED FORMULATIONS CONTAINING SODIUM PENTACHLOROPHENATE ARE F027
' *WOOD PRESERVING WASTES - ADMINISTRATIVE STAY
CCA TREATED WOOD WHEN DISPOSED
CLARIFICATION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE LISTINGS PERTAINING TO WOOD PRESERVING OPERATIONS
CLOSURE ISSUES RELATED TO WOOD PRESERVING PLANTS
DIOXIN IN WASTES FROM WOOD PRESERVING PROCESSES USING PENTACHLOROPHENOL
DRIPPAGE IN WOOD PRESERVING STORAGE YARDS
F027 LISTING - USED AND UNUSED FORMULATIONS IN WOOD PRESERVING
K001-LISTED WASTES FROM WOOD PRESERVING PROCESSES
PENTACHLOROPHENOL AS A WOOD PRESERVATIVE
REGULATORY STATUS OF RAINWATER IN WOOD PRESERVING PROCESS AREAS
REGULATORY STATUS OF VARIOUS TYPES OF PENTACHLOROPHENOL WASTES
REGULATORY STATUS OF WOOD STICKERS USED FOR WOOD PRESERVING OPERATIONS
SUBTITLE C IMPERMEABLE CAP REQUIREMENT FOR ON-SITE CONTAINMENT OF WOOD PRESERVING WASTES
TREATMENT SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS, REGULATORY OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO WOOD PRESERVERS
WASTEWATER TREATMENT EFFLUENT FROM PROCESSES THAT GENERATE K001 AND F006 WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGE
WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM WOOD PRESERVING PROCESSES USING CREOSOTE AND/OR PENTACHLOROPHENOL
WOOD PRESERVING AND SURFACE PROTECTION FACILITIES, CONTROLLING ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES FROM
WOOD TREATED WITH CREOSOTE, DISPOSAL OF
9452.1987(01) 02/24/87
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
XREF
9444
9441
9441
9444
9441
9444
9441
9441
9441
9444
9489
9441
9444
9476
9444
9489
9444
9445
9444
9441
9444
9442
9554
9484
9444
9444
9441
9441
.1992(07)
.1985(28)
.1990(20)
.1987(52)
,1980(04)
.1987(29)
.1986(28)
.1986(10)
.1991(19)
,1994(06)
.1991(03)
.1991(11)
,1992(08)
,1984(04)
.1985(02)
.1991(02)
.1987(10)
.1985(05)
.1988(15)
,1994(03)
,1987(29)
,1994(04)
,1990(15)
,1987(12)
,1984(10)
,1984(04)
.1986(28)
.1986(10)
11/30/92
07/16/85'
07/03/90
12/11/87
11/17/80
06/19/87
04/07/86
02/11/86
12/01/91
08/31/94
06/01/91
06/28/91
12/11/92
08/07/84
03/04/85
05/31/91
04/09/87
01/18/85
08/29/88
02/18/94
06/19/87
04/08/94
09/26/90
11/25/87
07/25/84
04/26/84
04/07/86
02/11/86
-------
II E .Bill III
i iiin !i
1 I iii! HI
fi I ill! il i HI I il III
07/02/9<5| !;j i i;: i ij : h
]!M !! Mil!
Mi i ij i ii , ;;i
I III
1 III
I
ill
= t i
a
! I 1
WOOD "TREATMENT! CYLiHEiER CREOSOTE SUMPS \ i
MOOD [TREATMENT! PLANT DRIP AREAS AS smua, REGULATION OF
ZINC PLATING
(See
I
I
Electroplating)
KOTHORD 3U»BX =
I i
!
! ! Ilia
I f: IS
I !
jj ;
Si I
q = «
m, s
ill ii i
Sj
Si;!
61 hi
Hi IE
Iili
II i
aH 1
it !
M ;
ft I
Hi II 111
iili mi I Si
Ms
,i mi 1111 !(! ill
ii' si a« • «I _ ,: s
i ( : J • _- j a „ « : 1 ., ,1
II!
a « i [I ft [
«i I
ill
II
i"
EJ t I £ --=--- -J ~- f I if
-J =* • ^ t- ~ i - H. ii
. t- -=« = - f
i- ... I s ?, ^ : • t :|
f? V ; ;sg- I in
- . i.._ - s »; g I - m f.
- ; ? - t = 1 : !
• - fc I
il
IE « I
1! 11 ill S 1!1
SI,
Ml!
JliM
' fc='
ill !!!! I
"E!!ili if it i
i ; i j;^; ^ ij i~
y i Pi liWi i ii iii
! I «! ill! I II l|l
j!
»to.
• i a :ii» i iz ill ; i a i mi
I = J IMF;, i 'j, ilf j I ii ! III!
! j j,!%: j:9s;o2.i98S(02);I!! os/17/fe
XREF
at
el
«•
!!!M
iii'
Luit:.
e:s
si a
t:*!S
aiii
aiw
E:
M
iii
E: i
c: i
i!
r:^
3; _ij,
fci **
a-
tci
J! ij
;! i ^ ;?;?
i; ii isi;
§ ^ s sis:
fi i 5 fli fc !
S ; *~'f\
-f £
II
!|ii
I " = ij*i L !
i s J m i
i
? )H i
i
Ml
*i i
if);
i'l !
t
H » \ =«;:
Ss * i « »it i
. _.
H*1
•? ft i iii1
ji K I S I 3
ill i Hi! i si
s.: f- " : f ? ' t :?
^fc ^ I a ii-B ! ( »
iii ils i!
, a is a i
Nil ii
! [Sill
-------
Volume 2
Addendum
Place the attached
documents at the end
of the appropriate
Category Number in
Volume 2
-------
',(
pr>
.».^.- '" Ao» ...... '-..I. '
iliilllH 111 I I'lllllill
III 'NIB lllllll
il'l ...... 1 ..... Illillilil ..... 'ill
III II III Ill III I) 1 ••lllllll I "fl
• I.
1 lllllll III Illllllllllllll III 1 III 1
Ilin ill 1 III 111 111 |i lllllil '1
1,1
Ill lllllll I* 11 I I ' ' * "i* "•
III III ll'lllllllll'l'll f ] l,i Hi .1
*,jj t , iiui i iiiiiii
llllllllllllll (Hill
(111
..i
I
Utf
111111 in iiiriH ii i ........
in in i - in
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
"i iriiiiiiiiiinniii:.' iiiiiiiiiki aiiiiiuiiiiiu, IIIIIIL^? , v
ill iiiiiii iiiiw iiiiii 11 i||iH iiiiiiiii iiiiiiii iiiiiiiiii 1^ 11^ n i in i ill i n in i iiiiiii 111111111 iiiiiiiii 11 inn i iiiiiiii i ii iiiii||iiiiiiiiiiii (i iiiiiii iiiiiiii • i
iiiii iiini iiiiiiiiiii mi
-------
HOTLINE QUESTIONS ANDXNSWER3
February 1995
9432.1995(01)
RCRA
1. Status of WWTUs/ENUs at
.GeneratorSites- •- .., •
A generator may treat hazardous waste .
without a permit or interim status in an on-site
accwnulation'unit that is in compliance with.
jte regulations in §26234 (Maroh24,1986;
•51ER10146,10168). If a generator chooses
to treat hazardous waste in anon-site
wastewater treatment unit or in an on-site-
elementary neutralization unit, must the ^
generator comply with §26234? • -.
No. A generator treating hazardous waste
in an on-site wastewater treatment unit or in
an on-site elementary neutralization umt,.need
not comply.with 3262:34,.whichis a : • -. •
conditional exemption from.pcrrmtting . ..-
requirements, because'these'unitsaie already,
exempt from certain RCRA leqinrerrtents;
Specifically, wastewater treatment units and.
elementary neutralization units, as defined in
§260.10, are exempt from RCRA treatment,
storage, and disposal facffity CTSpF).v .- .".
-standards as well as froni pernritting standards.
(§§264.1(gX6),
"27Q.l(c)(2Xv)).
-------
'.:iSiv"1!w''i
mm
', : | , ',, ,, I :
• !,, Isi ;i,;!'U^ i***:.,:'..;!-*'.,,
"'iii iiiiiii
;;; iBiiiiiii fa 'if-raffisSiS'-Sst'Si iis~:;; .'i1,,::,;1,1.;;:: i,1;::,} f: i1::;;-1 ::„; ii!:,;,.',,:::!::::::;:,
iiiiiiiisfi!,;!!1"1! itain^^^^^^^^
I' i"!l'(l!' "'ll^^ iii,iiiv:iili|lf i^^ i 'l ' ":' .Mini I'll!'""''' i i , liiii : mil;, 'lii'iiifii' iiiiiiiii'i
_ ^ __ ( ])M _ Wjj^JI^
liiiii'iliiiiiiiii'1 liiiiiiiijiiiiirji^iili'iiipii:!; "ii
"^"JiJil
' •''' * """':"|l" "I|:":: l|l!'' '";'' I'"::' " "*:'" "*' i;^r * 'I1;1 i!l:;!"::"":'J ! • •; ! -!!' * * il," iii!' "JV"^ ' •• • C' *'•;':'' ? S"";"', "•!!!!! ' i !iii-1]''"' W ' ^>:''" ^V^f ^ *'!'' f^:"' "• r-'"! ''T^1 !|' i" M Ifi!' p'" :i:K!|:!f :fllj!'.• •::!"'»"' • - "!i""i!f;: •' \"' 'f ™ ^™' • ^HW^.fiJf: :ii! i
iiiiiiiiiiiiiii iii1. M.* ;:,,: iiiiiiiiii;, ta?: T^n • * -MaR.". IT j »Ti'-i mr j t ' na aof *'!:!' »• • • N /JMT • '^,fS i1"!;::1:,;, ii "l -i ••' ys^A ••;,.' • flMfS ;i!,1;; ftelT,' lifcufc1. Slfss'iaiSiii'iiiin!:! vi •: ;"!i jw!i, '.i iii iai'li;+^ /i ]£ 'tiBiBiQglfeqiirii? ** •; ^ ijiii ,n, 7!: i.^ miif i iisliiS,,; ' i^rir^li^ .':i:!'
if ill "'il,"l .jiWiKHIi-lliir1 >•;,ill
"liin'il"'"'! ririlililiriJP ''I'l'l!' .ilii'l'illl'1 ,|,','l,, 'ill ,,,,,'lill'' "ill",,,"! ;:>':! "!! il',,!,,, ill,, IV /"nil,;, :'!iii!! '".I:'!,: lil'i'lill '„ ."'/JliiHijill,'»'l',,,, JIRk:,!!!!:1!: x'1!.., I1;;,:1.!""!** illitliinkU'Kli MUll'l",
!' "" "H1 " ', '! „!» ,„:',;!£ !:'„'•:!!» ' i Mi' »'! '" ,|!!!!!'!!!„!!!!:!:' '!" i • "! i1!1" • ''lli: /'!'!'4 ,»•n^! V'l !|j! ^^^ ,„ h ,•' '. ' ! "' ", '.ll111'II ,",'? IT" I!!1!1"™! AHS!1 ,111
•i . «• ', -;, , | - , ,' ;;• »,i»il , ^ •• • •
lliili''''!!!!!!!;1!*, 1: ''I!:',!,,"I"1' - !ll!.;!Jlllj '- '
}:'M ,1^11 J: i: ,
i iJiiin'!; ri'iiiiii iiilliin,, < i '!„<
;?'! I i, "1 •{,, ", ;; ;, . f | ( ^
[iiii jn \ 'ij iit1 »rp ' !' ' iiiii!',:!i>ii,|""',,"; i i, ' i ii'ii,' iifi,! •; i j;y.i SiBy^M: i i iii ,• fiiiii,";, s >. ',v3i fi "i-i -im ; sr 11! ttX'Vt^yaf^^f^'^m i '^f« ii ana^ „*,:, i ,.:m':;iiit,i'i "1111 -T.* ua*,"*-.
li} IK I, 'If! , JI,JI i•• liif'i,!',, ii", ii!,;!| i|,,'!J|||i r, Kill . I'.,!;,')!''' .. jiiij,',!,.; ,|4.,";',,, | •.'!!«' [,;;: ,,;" !•!'".{„'* j;„.((i^i^j^(,^'t"^ili«i/,'.iJWPj;1*,,S'i,!f!!'iiii!;^.1W.C! ;WBf: !• ,',";!• '.W *if:F!!;'"!'!«!i, ''m't.1&jf ;:l*
ll'Piilllll ' ,,,!'l< llllilillllli'l'lli! hi, " ,,: '!"[ '|i"'l!']"i,,,',,i I'iM'ilillllllllllll'"!!!!!,, ", Iliilflllllllil'l
I «;T| ;• B||;tM |;JH;i || | t r, ^ p|! , ^ ,
,iiii"i .it,!, 'I'' ^iii"' '',„'' aiji;,i i' i,:':, " ii ' tii, ii,,,";', '""iiiiijiii, V',,ir'iiii»'ii|i iiiiji":' ' ' '.iliiiiiwK m,",! JMJ 'iiiii'i1'i|:''|i,,,w I'i'rii"'!:"!'!!'',!,!1 ;' ''"li'ii, "I'l"'"''^'^""'^"''^''!'!^ ,,,isuli'iniH;^^^
'i'i' ,; ': sf> Vs (ri ; , ; » " j''i'-' w :
Mi;.' m ..... 3 ii!' !". nit • II li •: i W'V ; d*
" : ' ' '•" ..... - /, - ,
"! "! :,; i "it i ' iiiiiF ,, j i'iilii , " i. s'(> . . niife" t ii'i' ; j ij I- :ts "•• f
, ;;;:::::,: .1. PMD inii : t ..... ":U . "•.«'i!Jf*n*'r.:ri ...... i, .s.
• ,- • ii!i";: ,fT< jf'i • f; :"I: ^ f< , •••*• "f : j :' K"i ..... IP «' ,''' ifiHiirf'sa ', *•*»! ....... a zx^
.i- !• ..... if I '; ;:: mti &* ..... ' ;i' ........ : ..... i ..... i' ........ Siii ' 'f ....... ..... «'"i ..... iii ..... feti:; ....... ii'!" S ..... HM'tSfi^!"
t. ; j ...... ;i'| IB
> ...... !tk5.'fl.'ik".'i,ii',i!i*!1.! «'.v
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
v: ill 1", i i,',!>'i lull.
llllH'ii / liiilLi !' IT 'illlUlili ; 'iillllililllll' '".;,,, ;,.!,"' nil': ,>'", 'i'll-::" •
m 1,111 ",; , "in , li'iiiiiil, |i III'IM ......... iniiiiHig1 ....... n "IIIII"!,:,,,",!.!',!'','!! ....... u tv,
" ...... ii
'91 i:
"ll,'l:'"lii
"i iiNliil*
,, "i; ' i jiii'j ' trw1 ll L",!"! ",; • i,/; 'i1!1 ' ..... : 'i ;i ii'1!' , , v ...... iii ",'.:• , , •' ;'!!i""i ' '•! ' ; ; '
iKiii' rt'i i ' ii''i!"' , 'i1 'f'1* I.;,'ji 'i'1 '1:. " iilvit < ;. , ''''lii:'; .....
rf.
i : j •' iii'1"' " , i '»;;'!!![ * !" ':.isjtji it j;! "'" i"!'"!|i"1 1 j v1 .';.'•'': f ; "'I'!,;;;;!!1,;';, '' ' '" 'j ;*>;3 ' , ';» "•"'J, i,;"; ''I; "J Ifi"""""'' 'i*HJt' 'f1''1! i i'S1'"' •'iilK1'!^!! i1' 'i"1"!1 ''IS5"1' , •''' Si!!1! : '
' t " ' ;"' ..... (^
"i1'1,!!; Ill iliiliiil' ill "M "ii, ii Illllliii'l :"
l '" ill,"»I rl'l'i',;' i II,!"" I11 L"i l«ii' I11! ipl ""' ,111 1! M, i 1", LI 1 ,'i !!!' I',
.JRiEJ i'iBisiiiliail,1!,'" ,,,r
i iilf , jll, ...jrli Siili fil'LN iii l, All j'1 <
iliiriiffi ,
•ill 1 I
(Illllll 11 II IIII 111 Hi
III
-------
uiie^
WASHINOTON.D.C. 20460 "
- . • ..:••• 9432.1995(02)
*. *
10121995 ' ':**mS3Si
_ - . RESPONSE
Mr. Scott Kuhn - ' ' . • "* ' ' V-V.V\" •;•':;••.-.,;"... •-,;;'•<..•.:,--• : . . •
Corporate Compliance • - -. •
Laidlaw .Environmental Services, Incorporated
P. O. Box 210799-
Columbia, SC 29221 • •• . -•
Dear Mr, Kuhn: ..-.,, . • • '
. This is-in response to your letter of July 26, 1995
requesting clarification of treatment, as defined at .
4DCFR 260 10, as -it relates to hazardous waste Zuel blending
activities; You also present two interpretations of treatment
related to'fuel blending and .ask whether they are consistent
•with RCRA Subtitle C regulations. ' . •
As your letter correctly notes, -there is no definition of
"fuel blending" in the Federal regulations. However, there are
letters and memoranda that present Agency policy regarding fuel
blending as discussed below.
Your first interpretation states that the consolidation *r
blending of compatible bulk o* containerized hazardous waste into
-a tank^orcontainer for.the purposes of efficient traneportation
or Setsosal would not be considered treatment, as long as there
wsno^hangein the physical, chemical or biological character
of the wastl? except fo£ incidental reduction of hazards
associated with the waste mixture which may occur. I^.eupport of
this interpretation, you note a -letter from Sylvia Lowrance to
Christopher Jaekels (March 1* 1990)..
we generally agree with this interpretation, but wj£h the
following clarification. You used the term "blending" to
describe the combining of waste streams for efficient .-
transportation or disposal. However, the activities you •
described^Jould not bTconsidered "fuel blending* for regulatory
purposes, so the use of the term "blending* may cause confusion
on this point. Also, please note that site-specific
UterminStions would bS made by authorized States, because.
individual States may have regulations and policies regarding.
treatment that are more stringent than the Federa?L regulations.
Your second interpretation states that the blending of
hazardous waste fuel with the indention of meeting a
specification would be considered treatment, because t&e physical
-------
r^s^^TIsI^Sf-ss
i -
P.02
X ££t inte^retation, x am «nc^b.l«g a . . •
Enolosure
MJL .t?***^' Director
'ffifce>6f Solid Waste
II.
coi Matt Hale, PSPD .
Prank fteaiiater, PSPD
Jim Mioha«lr PSPD
Jeff Qaines, PSPD
vim Thotnpflon* OECA • •
SiTvernan, O3C
Permit Section Chief*, Regions X-X
-------
Volume 4
Addendum
Place the attached
documents at the end
of the appropriate
Category Number in
Volume 4
-------
I I PMNUJI1JIUIUI-JUIL ILJUi—UJiU
1 ' ;~' :"'" ' ' " "'"' 7 : " ' ' ™l" '™ " ; '"""*!l='1 'Si-'"* 4:"v;j: 2-1; :=:r'T i111: :?: •', i. • . •. ••...•:'; «., • '.. /«... • ^
•Sit Mi! |M^ liii iiS iJBi^'i's'l
, ' J' 1 , ; Ii j | • '|"J
, „,„ ; d ,, ni ?|,'\ „',, i"'" ' „ „ » «r , „ • ii , , , „ , ,,,n" "i.jui ],„
' "T rt.iln'll111" '
HIIlil1,''"'. 1, i'1;:'""i- .if'» , n ll'IPkl'I'VI;:!'1 ;,'\\" ,mi||| Tl ; i,"!!,,> lii11,!"1/1":™!;'1!!"" Id ,i , ftriHn,;;:!,, "ir>.:>»,'' r l;i!,.;«il|l| .nsLfuiif ,,i'!!;;;,!";,iii|i ,| ;hi«!!IIPP|P|ii»l!P illh ;: W' AiTHli l!";!i:i' ,i ,1! ,/lii
ilPjPuBP ..... ,|l< m," i; 'I111 1 K,,1,!1!" , n|,, III „..;!!. i >' CV.-'ili'li' . II ..... '
I "igil ,- :•, i! ' ;'i \\«"K< ,'l!l:""ll! ..... , IK ...... 4' Ml" ; /"
l!'«': ,:Uil 'W lit,!'1!1 >l, ,,
!1!1' ill 'V'iiil1 ..... miMl'llpi .ll,:1'!.!'!1!,":",;,! ''*' '!"',! ...... "'i,
III,1 »U 'liKi'1'.'1" ...... P rlTILIil! IB i • ..... :;i I1 » W1,, '
!l.ll<.'illt! "Mi!!'!':",:" liraMJlnniiililPi " ...... ! '""i,,1 ull,'1:,"
' ilillHilillllP1' ..... 'ii<" !
niii1'1 SUM,i, iiiiiniiiiiinip:;::i ^.'i
„ , 'i ...... ...... ii i , :,,„ ' < in „ ,i , ' ,„
;, dip1 <: s; ' ' t:> JPP < PHI ppinii ji
• 11 LI,, , ' I"1! IP,i Ll'ln IJIJII
iu!"d HI ,„,,"! lilt' il» WiilllP i'l liUiilllilH'lil,; i'"" "'lifi i.iPBln'f.irJlitLIM'jB!;,J-,
' '.'I'li "'"iilllllii,,'!;:"!!" ''IIIIIIIIB'P1 'HIIIBIIiillWllilK11!':,1,;"1"1!!!!:1
; li ,i Pi'i • MI -f ! ' |r i ;,;
, i „ , " ,,, •, ; i , |P ,||n ;,;< |, , / p,
. ,,,,„„ ii; | ,,,„,,,,,,,,.„,,,,„.,„. : . r, : i| :, ,., ,., , ,,,,..„ u|1| ,, ,,„, ,,„,,, ,r,: , ,„,, iiij,;", rtt'i'ii;'luiF^ln ;iJiriJiiiili'i, •./ ".!• 'i*; ' ijVj1 \iiiiii1;'iw'wii ,, ,,,„,,
-. ; • ; :-: .-•; : : *r' -,;':::::- •:":,;, ;" :;:; : •'=,; :=:' /!''.,'"' ^-":"";"': '.'•. -'',." *' '' ! :' „"".'";'- * i, '/ =: V -! •• -]' .'•': [ s's; • ;•;";. . »l "i;' -. "•=;*, >!''," •=•' •;'' -v*"» ' '"
- f ' • -1
iiUH^^^^^^ :, ;" iiiiifii ;<<, -'';;!.<'•' in 'lil-iiiiilp iiii ^f , ? .iii''^!^!!^!;!':;!'', "i-'i ,, IF'T; K n' itijiii'Vi!' '; ;•:< jiM,,!;1.1;,"" i, iihiri,!'iii.ii- ,£ ' 'iiiiiiiiiji'iiti'.l":'^!*! i* jjiiLHAlll iS'illii ."' Wiwi-' ii"i:(M ''ii! ' iiwiliiiiiiii iiisliif", iliyiltiu^
iiiiiS^^^^ ;«^^^^^^^^^^^ 'i'.'.!i,( £•:!'"i '*:I'M'i. ' itiii'Ji. tSi't,.'.ii ''i'.( .'iSw''.'."*!?]! iiiiiiii'"; i",;, ••,:>' ~'.',i ^''.ft^' s 'J iii'p.f i. ijijsi1 • i"";^.^!:''^, IjiS^^^^ tuwo-Jp'Xw'*!^1'1:wi". StSi !• >,'! r '•*! "un..:»*f3
' i * * "" '' "T1 .' "' ."' ", ' I:' ."
ik:,,;1;!., (lllllil!,:!
• ;„::« •:
Left Blank
s1: lii'iuTii111 ; liiliii" '! i! ::;ii • .iliiiii i. iii' rii <:: liiL.iiihi.:' iiisiiiiE > •' iiiiiiii '„' IE 'siii1 ,•<:; iiiiitna^^^^^^^ ."::': i:« yi- i >< ',if.d iiu :. r i> i. - ui' .<, , iiiiiiiiiiiijHiriii: >, ifiii'iiiiii!:1 ,:Li]iiiiiiiH^^^^^^ < 'iii'i Mtwii:!)111: itiiii-iffi..'!-'!' •asiHi'iiir.M cut T', n'W! iiiiiii.itJiiii, } iiiin'i"! i in1;!*
,*,,
/•
J""!
iii 111111111111111111 i iiiiiiii Ji
l I
111 I lilllllili III IIU in
"f
111 llllllH^ III III Illllllllllll Illlllllllllllllll Illllllllll III III III III 111 lilllllili lilllllili I 111 1111II 111 III 1111III Illlllllllllll 111 III 111 111111 111 lilllllili I II 111 lilllllili 111 III 111 111
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
JAM. '2
9441.1995(01)
-: .i,-. OFFICEOF
SOU? WASTE AND EMERGENCY
> • RESPONSE
Chris Bryant " . ?^
The Technical Group, Inc. '
1300 I Street, N.W. •£'..--.
Suite 1000 West ** .
Washington, D.C. 20005 -
Dear Mr. Bryant: - .
Thank you for your letter of August 2, 1994, raising a
number of questions about the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act hazardous waste regulations. I apologize for the delay ^ in
our response. Your questions concern 40 CFR 261. 6 (a) (3) (iii) , a.
provision exempting "used batteries (or used battery cells)
returned to a manufacturer for regeneration" from the hazardous
waste regulations, and its applicability to lead-acid batteries.
• • - • '
;When the regeneration provision was initially proposed on
April 4, 19 8 3;* the Agency explained that the basis for the
exemption was that regeneration presents minimal risk to the,
environment and thus full regulation is not necessary
(48 FR 14496). Since the reasoning behind the exemption was
based on the activity (regeneration) rather than the type of
facility at which the activity is conducted, the Agency has
historically interpreted the exemption to apply broadly to
batteries that are regenerated at; any type of facility- See
Enclosure 1: question 6 from the September, 1985, RCRA\ Super fund
Hotline Monthly Summary. Note that the term regeneration means
activities such1 as recharging, replacing electrolyte, and/ or
rewiring, in which the battery casing is not cracked to recover
metal values. . . .
You request clarification of whether the regeneration
exemption would apply to various types of locations at which
lead-acid batteries are regenerated. In short, based on the
reasoning discussed above, the regeneration exemption would apply
to batteries regenerated at any location, including all of those
you describe in your letter.. • ' . . . . •
."*. • .*"*" ^*
You also ask if the applicability of the exemption would
change if some handlers of the batteries assume they will be
smelted to recover metal values rather than regenerated. Again,
the exemption applies to any used batteries that are regenerated ..
Thus, once it is determined that a battery is to be regenerated,
it is appropriate to manage it in accordance with the
r
J
WmtdwfthSoy/Cwtotalnkoo
-------
.-»«.-!» .U .
ll ,'
..
regeneration provision. I caution, however, that batteries that
. are not regenerated (e.g., if it is determined:that regeneration
, is not possible) are subject, throughout their w*»t« *mnag«»«nt
cycle, to the usual hazardous waste provisions that would .
otherwise apply. For lead-acid batteries, this would be • ,•
Subpart G of 40 CFR Part 266. For other hazardous waste
batteries, this would be the full hazardous waste regulations. ,
Thus, if it is not known whether batteries are to be regenerated,
until such va determination is made it would be prudent to manage
them under the hazardous waste regulations that would be
applicable if the batteries are not regenerated.
niiin iiiiiiiiip" Hi in hi, > i iiiiii1 liilliiii guiii111 ii' gggggggngggpi' iigggigggiGjgiggiggggggiggggiggggggggggggggggggggggiii gi gggggggggggigggggggi giggii ggggi igggggggi pi i hi
11 in i n ni 11 n • In n nun in i n i in n gin i mi
I believe this discussion answers all of your questions.
Although you did not specifically ask about the interaction of
the regeneration provision and 40 CFR Subpart G for lead-acid
bakeries", • I have enclosed question one from the November 1994
Monthly Hotline Report which addresses this issue and may be of
interest* See Enclosure 2. Please also note that .in the' .
Universal llste :pfcopoiaX (58 FR 3X02; February 11, 1993) the
Agencyrequested comment on possible changes to both the
! ;£fe$In"e7S£ion provision and 40 CFR' Subpart G for .lead-acid '
batteries. Thus the final Universal Haste rule, which the Agency
* expects to promulgate this spring, could include some changes to
these provisions. . Thank you for your interest in the hazardous
waste regulations. , " •
J. Petruska, Chief
Regulatory"'" '
Enclosures (2)
in ni i iiiiii ii in in n lini i , r
-------
^THE TECHNICAL GROUP, INC
t •• ' • '. ;: ' •' • "•• • •:•;•••-'••;•
). . August 2, 1994
Michael H. Shapiro, Director ,
Office of Solid Waste
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street,.S.W. '
Mail stop 5301, Room 1201 ...
Washington, D.C. 20460 •„ .
.,. .. _ * «'•• •* ,~ • - •
.Re: Request for Regulatory Clarification
Dear Mr. Shapiro: . , ......
I .write to 'request" clarification^ of the scope of the
regulatory exclusion codified at ; 40 C.F.R. Section
261.6(a)(3)(iii). This exclusion exempts from regulation under
Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
lead-acid batteries returned to a battery manufacturer for
regeneration. .
Factual Background
- ' For purposes of responding to this request for
clarification, .some background on the secondary lead industry may
be helpful. In general, there are two types of secondary lead
smelters:- integrated smelters and independent smelters. Integrated
lead smelters generally are owned or.operated by lead-acid battery
manufacturing companies. More often than not, the smelter
operations are not located at the battery manufacturing facility.
Independent smelters generally are neither owned nor operated by
lead-acid battery manufacturers. Lead smelters receive batteries
and other lead-bearing materials from, among others, two key
sources: scrap dealers or lead-acid battery manufacturers.
A portion of the lead-acid batteries received at a lead
smelter generally are routinely inspected upon receipt. On
occasion, lead-acid batteries that appear to be usable are tested
to determine whether they are spent, or whether they merely require
new electrolyte or recharging. Recharging or-the addition of. new
electrolyte may occur at the smelter, or may be shipped off-site at
another facility for regeneration or recharging.
Environmental Consulting
I STREET. XW - SLITE 1000 WEST - WASHINGTON. DC 20005
-------
I * I I I IJ . IIII II ll
i ill in 11 iiiiinn i ii i iiiiiiinii in ii ii i| i mi Illiiiiiiini inn 'in in in nil i| if
Michael H. Shapiro
August 2, 1994 .
2 " ' ' '
,
THE CHNlCALGROUP. li
Given this background, I request clarification on the
scopeofSection 261.6(a)(3)(iii) as it may apply in the following
Circumstances:
Would the exclusion be applicable to
an integrated lead smelterwhich
regenerates or recharges batteries
on-s ite, assuming the lead smelter
is located at or adjacent to a lead
battery manufacturer.
answer to" the " a"go"ve-
question change if the integrated
lead smelter were not located at or'"
adjacent to a battery manufacturer?
:«!!™^^ SBSffl
•~^":—Sc,•".-.. i::::::::
r >"
" 3.
I
I
Would the responses to these
questions clhange if the lead smelter
shigs'-T^the'" batteries~. off-si.te . for.
^regeneration? '-.'.'"• . . ;" •'
Would the responses to these
questions change if the batteries
were delivered to the lead smelter
by a scrap dealer who assumes that
the batteries will be smelted?
'[
Does the- Section 261.6(a)(3)(iii)
exclusion apply to independent lead
smelters who recharge batteries or
who replace battery electrolyte on-
site in batteries shipped to them
for smelting?
§ Houcl the response ' to the above
;;•-;.-;.-•; guest ion change if the independent
smelter ships the batteries off-site
for regeneration?
^'n..^™ ...*.;" ........... I .......... look forward to your response to this request. If you
or your staff have any questions, please call me at (202) 962-8534.
IlliK IR
j ;
life > :"
iii ii ..... Urn'.' i ..... t ..... iiiiji:1.! •;
"i ..... ': ,• " :" ?fe ':'". ...... ' •:? "ff":i ..... Mi t •• ' . ...... : •< • '"i" '• f ; ..... ............ •'?"• •« ' ' .
iw/.tvn ...... i^ttr: ..... r ..... iii •>. 'jiw i"; >i ..... M"^•••' " • * &
BT&TiWi' ^B"
•
] : :„ :
-------
01/31/95 12:47 ®202 260 0637 n " - EPA CO> ItSB/IO ^^ -\" ' 12001
STATES ENVfROMWEMTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
; WASHINGTON, O.C. 20460
"•'" '-- '• • 3 - -%<•-, % - ,
' .'•'/ ":;.'.'..' "; . 9441.1995(02)
.IAN"31 1335 : . ...-
SOUDWW5TEANDEMEFGENCY
RESPONSE
Mr. Bruce s. Gelber
Acting Chief *,' <•.<„„ •
Environmental Enforcement Section
U.S. Department of Justice
142S New-York Avenue, N.W.
Washington D.C. 20005 . ' ;
Dear Mr. Gelber:
I- / This letter responds to your J^g** g£ * ais^x™
/?«+-or-«ina-hion reaardintf the regulatory status ox a aisvj-.i.x«uc
determination regar«i«y «-** « . Revived rrom petroleum and
-^
and Recovery Act (RCRA).- .. ••.
on Keville's «ritten infoinaation
product) .
Tjc-830 results from a reactibn of petroleum and/or coal tar.
-•••
of what was needed as a fuel source) .
-------
**''" C I" ' '' -t'l, ' - w
IV 01/31/85 12:47 t*202 260 0637 EPA CAD RDB/IO
"isfe^^misss^iSos£^;^M-^-- .
being burned for energy recovery.
iiiiiipi in iiiiiii in i in iiiiiii
{SkO JLflLCl* CinCi **OZfC*J*» **Vr *ifc^ W**^« mm^Pir ^^
impose-more stringent requirements.
' ' ' -,?'"i" ^SlSSS "Vy^n^-^tSS^e^o^you01 '
Neville Chemical's tx-83o. AI you ««.v«*.«•. ._^-1%. ^^^^jtenc
should contact Mitch Kidwell, of
. ' . ' - -. Sincerely,
II lllllll 111 Illlllllll
Michael H'. Shapiro, Director
Office of Solid Waste
.!,! , Enclosures ' * •'
' " ' Ml ' J " A
• cc:* Thomas C. Voltaggio
' , Hazardous Waste Management •
•II i.iiii i iiiiii ^Division Director,' EP*l Reg
' , Hazardous Waste Management • ,
i»i I";;];" ;; |j.,,|i,M,m ...Division Director,' EPA Region ill.
|l 1 in ' . " « ,; ,. •
I III 111 HI II I Illl Mill IIIIIII I IIIIIII Illl II II III 111 IIIIII I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIWIIIIIIIII I I ill Jill Jill 111 I 11 I III I I j* I ^ . f •
-------
01/31/95 12:48 t?202 280 0637 ' EPA CAD RDB/IO il003
••:'•'•• ' • '- Enclosure I'-/ __ • , ; ,.,,,^^.t.
It is EPA's understanding" that LX-830 results froar Neville's
resin manufacturing process.-... LX-830 is solely^c°^|;*;*du°f ~ -
unreacted material that results from this resin ^"^^"l ino
process. Neville manufactures various types of^resin by feeding
,-law materials into a polymerization reaction^ These_ raw^ ;.^_
: materials are a blend of petroleum hydrocarbon feedstocks and
coal tar naphtha feedstocks ("feedstock blend"). The temperature
and length of time of any polymerization reaction is completely -
controlled by Neville's intent to produce a...specific type of.
Ssin? Any polymerization reaction results in .reacted material,
or SsinVand inreacted- material. The reacted material/resin^
must be separated from the unreacted material. Nevilleuses two
processes'to separate the reacted material/resin from the_ .
Sreacted materials 1) venting and-2)tSteam stripping. Neville
'vents a certain amount of unreacted material from.^Y^sel^in
which the polymerization reaction took place (^polymerization
vessel"). A portion of this, vented unreacjed aaterxal may be
ip^ecycled back into the feedstock blend. The'unreacted material
• that cannot be vented from the polymerization vg;sfi.^1??S
from the reacted material by steam stripping. Jy introducing
steam into the reaction vessel ^Neville strips the unreaoted
'material from the reacted material. This stripping" process
^results in a imiscture of, steam and unreacted material?; «£J
jf mixture • is coaled;, allowing the steam-t^condense^into water; the
:water i« then decanted from the. unreacted material. A portion of
•"-the remaining unreacted material may1 be recycled back^into the
feedstock blend. Any, remaining unreacted material vhich is nor
recycled is mixed With the vented unreacted material... This
mixture of unreacted material is "LX-830." •
s
* .'.
-------
, I v ft. (, .
US. Department of Justice
90-7-1-689
. 'i Hiafungun. CtC 2OS30
i n , , , ,.,_», ^ . t . -r ,
. January 27, 1995
ill III I II r i ' » fl « ij jl n «I i f 4 h h
III I " | /
TELECOPY AMD INTER-OFFICE MATf.
Michael H. Shapiro (Kail code 5301)
Director, Office pf solid Waste
u< S. Environmental .Protection•Agency
4 01 M street, S. W. :
Washington, D.c. 20460
" ;:; :"::"" ::"" :""" "Re: Classification of Neville .Chemical Company's
; ; - LX-830 Diimiiti TI^^ jbi^. M& P<,gSlaLLg
* Dear Mr. Shapiro: : = ; ' •• : : "' :: ' ' ; ! : ; '
"ii - . ™ j > • a I
,- * am'writing to request that the Office of Solid Waste
Prov}d2 ui -Vith. | Britten determination, as to. the appropriate
.regulatory, classification of Neville .Chemical" Company's
Petroleum-based distillate, which Neville calls "LX-830."
R^ioiCTT?? ?nSViKUSl? re^Ste
-------
r
NEVILLE
Neville Chemical Company
March 6, 1992
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Robert E. Greaves, Chief
RCRA Enforcement/UST Branch
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region m
; 841 Chestnut Building
Philadelphia, PA 19107
RE: RCRA Section 3007 Information Request
I Neville Chemical Company \ ;
Product {?fo««jfie9tien ef LXP-830 .-. : .
Dear Mr. Greaves:
As you may recall, during our meeting with you and your staff in Philadelphia on November
' 27 1991 you invited Neville Chemical Company ("Neville') to submit additional information
for your consideration in determining whether our LX»-830, also referred to as 'fuel oil" or
•fuel oil distillate/ is a product or a waste. Accordingly, this letter serves to provide you with
all of the specific information requested by your staff. Such information includes a detailed
process description, the quantification of chloride compounds in feedstocks purchased by Neville
and in our LX«-830 fuel oil, and a comparison of the purchase price of the feedstocks and the
sales price of our LX«-830 fuel oil. This letter also serves to memorialize the basis for
Neville's classification of its LX»-830 as a product.
*
As a practical matter, because the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA" or "the
Agency') authorized the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to implement the base Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act ('RCRA") hazardous waste program, a determination of whether
LX*-830 should be classified as a product or a waste is based solely on an application of the 25
Pa. Code Part 261 regulations of the Pennsylvania* Department of Environment Resources
("PaDER" or "the Department'). These regulations have been in place since the early 1980s
and have not yet been revised to be consistent with the pce-Hazardous and Solid Waste
Amendment Cpre-HSWA') definition of solid waste regulations promulgated by EPA on January
4 1985 5« 50 Fed. Reg. 614. Although Pa DER's regulations do not contain the ._eo=.__
,UH£.
ATTACHMENT I
-------
1:22 ?M ;OO« - *. ,. , | ^ , , ; 2:.25156523:
a [ Mr! Rolert E. Greaves, Chief .' ,/.'}!,,,
"'• HA & invironmenfal Projection Agency *'-?;v4'1" '-. .''•-. , March 6, 1992
Philadelphia, PA 19107 -,..,,.-. ,..-,, , , : .; * . pwe 2
* * .. HI m nil j»*t i 11 i, jV | . * • ta*' .'• \ \ » «" i •>""'„*, I « > It , %»n in * H ' i ™fc» *»
HI ii t in i i* iiiiirvfc««r ,"* ^-\ $ f\ ,.JL qvj,it j, u "»^"—s •"' 1, ' ~ . J ' j i* * I J|p (H ' • ii *" « ^
- |l'1' prSct* vers'us" •by-product" distinction as found" in EPA's current definition of solid waste
PlDER does provide a mechanism whereby materials that would otherwise fail a
hazardous waste test can be deemed exempt from the hazardous waste management
, provided such materials have commercial value and a history of routine commercial
..„, , .. . „ -y 25 Pa. Code 5 75.26JL(e)(l)).
i"i«| i • I flrti ' • ( ! \ :
19S3, the Department granted Neville the 25 Pa. Code § 261.6
. .
coemption for LX*-830. Although a PaDER foUow-up letter dated August 15,1991 called the
exempt status of LX*-830 into question based on .allegations that various waste streams were
added to the fuel oil distillate, these accusations were categorically not true. Neville has never
added waste stream*: to its LX*-830 and still continues to rely on the October 19, 1983
"
i
'V '""
Further, in an attempt to promulgate new definition of solid waste regulations, PaDER proposed
;, PK-4 hazardous waste regulations in January 1990, revised the regulations based on comments'
received on the proposal, and on March 17, 1992 is scheduled to present these revised PK-4
regulations to .the Pennsylvania Environmental Quality Board for approval. The Department's
••pending regulations would replace the existing beneficial reuse exemption at 25 Pa. Code $
•2^6 with "product,* "co-product11-and by-product" designations at 25 Pa, Code {260.2. These
'imminent Pennsylvania'regulations; which clarify the issue of which materials are products and
g which are wastes, go beyond the existing federal distmctions among these terms.
| Specifically, a "product" is defined as a "commodity that is me sole or primary intended result
of a manufacturing or production process." A "co-product" is defined as:
Any material generated by a. manufacturing or production process or an expended
material, of a physical character and chemical composition that is consistently
equivalent to, or exceeds, the physical character and chemical composition of an
intentionally"'manufactured product or produced raw material, provided that the
use of the material presents no greater threat of harm to human health or the
environment than the use of the product. The term only applies to such material:
ill Hi iiiiiii i ill i p\*\ •*•!. . • i • 1 t. , **j. j*.t • i. .'
- _ 0) if the material is to be transferred in good faith as a commodity in trade,
,* ' ^ for use in lieu of an intentionally manufactured product or produced raw material,
.without processing, and the material is actually used on a regular basis; or
(ii) if the material is to be used by the'manufacturer or producer of the
-' material in lieu of an intentionally manufactured product or produced raw
,' material, without processing, and the material is actually used on a routine basis.
I. Evca under the Agency's definition of solid waste, LX»-830 Is a "co-product* because It Is one of
, two primary products that b intentionally and separately produced by Neville, and LX*-830 is
suitable for end use as is (i.e., as a Aid oil) without any additional bleadiag. Sat 48 Fed. Reg.
14472 at 14476 (April 4,19S3) ind 50 Fed Reg. 614 at 625 and 630 (January 4,1985).
-------
Mr. Robert H. Greaves, Chief - . . ,
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency . March 6, 1992
Philadelphia, PA 19107 „ , , , ,, .>,..-. Page 3
• .-: - • .. .-,.t. .- ;:.-.,,„ ,.,,^, ..r;, ", :*«,».:,• •-,-.,.• -..V«,< :•••.,:... ,.-A«iri .(J».<- M '."":.-•, --i-.i ,p-,i ^..y., , »A,W ,. .. ^B" "
A "by-product* is simply defined as any material that does not qualify as a 'product* or a "co-
product" regardless of its value. In contrast, the federal definition sets forth a different
standard. • . ' .-•••'".<-> — ..'•"...>*-..-•. c -
As documented extensively in this letter and in our prior letters to the Agency dated June 17,
1991, August 8, 1991. September 4, 1991, October 11. 1991 and October 24, 1991, because
Neville's LX*-830: (1) is of the same composition and quality as other raw materials that would-
be used by our customers in their production processes if the LX*-830 were no longer available
(and our customers will support this assertion); and (2) is actually used as a commodity in .trade
on a "regular* and "routine* basis in lieu of a more expensive raw material, our LX*-830 is
correctly classified by the PaDER as exempt under the authorized Pennsylvania hazardous waste
program, would be classified as a 'co-product* under £PA*s hazardous waste program and
would be classified as a "co-product' under PaDER's revised definition of solid waste. .
Process Description ..-..-' '
At Attachment A, we have provided you with a resin production diagram that also depicts the
production of distillates, which make up the LX*830 product line. As illustrated by the
diagram, the process feed streams must include sufficient amounts of generically compatible non-
reactables in order to manage the polymerized portion of the feed subsequent to polymerization.
After separation, two streams (products) are produced: (1) Hydrocarbon resins; and (2)
Distillate. Pan of the distillate is recycled back to the feed stream in order to maintain the
proper concentration of polymerizables. The unrecyded portion is used to produce LX*-830.
When Neville designed and developed its resin manufacturing process in the 1930's, we intended
(and needed) to produce two separate products (i.e., resin and fuel oil distillate). Without the
production of the fuel oil distillate, resin could not t?e produced at a cost capable of meeting
competitive market pricing.
Fuel Oil Blending Diagram • . .
There have been no changes in our fuel oil blending and distribution diagram as set forth in
Attachment B. We do not have the draft drawings from which the draftsman prepared either ,
the original drawing dated December 22, 1988 which incorrectly suggested the inclusion of
miscellaneous sources with LX*-830 or the revised drawing dated December 15, 1989.
Quantification of Chloride Compounds in .
Feedstocks Versus the LX+-830 Fuel CXI
In Attachment C, we have provided you with the results of the analyses of the raw material
feedstocks received from our suppliers which contained unidentified chloride compounds at
levels in excess of 400 parts per mfllion. During processing, these feedstock chloride
compounds carry through to, and accumulate in, the distillates. Neville does not add any
chloride-containing materials to its LX*830. Analyses provided at Attachment D illustrate
-------
ill iiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii mi
•27-3! 2:22 ?M :£C
Mr. Robert E. Greaves, Chief
XJ. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Philadelphia, PA 19107
March 6, 1992
"V Page 4
the chloride content similarities between the raw material feedstock blends and the resultant
distillate streams. Attachment D also illustrates the organic chemical similarities between the
feedstock blends and the distillate streams. . '"'"' ;
Comparison of Feedstock Purchase Price
Price
The cost of raw materials range from approximately 5.80/gallon to approximately $1.20/gallon.
The value, of £$LX*-830 fuel oil is approximately $.4Wgallon, but depends upon the market.
Sales at lower values have occurred, "due ' to high inventory levels or depressed market
conditions. ' '• , ; ' : ' ;..' ..!..,, .'"•.'
Customers Use of LX*-830 ,. '
i * I ' "" : "' ;'|~1' : :: _ ^ "; | _ ' : "::"« : I ,
LX*-830 customers' usexbclude viscosity modification within their fuel blending operations.
nJEnjet, Inc. specifically advised EPA that they blead LX*-830 with other cutter stock-fuel ofl to
'produce a blended product suitable for use in marine fuels and/or fuel oil. Enjet customers
include BP North America, Hill Petroleum and Chemoil Gulf Coast See Enjet letter of
September 10, 1991 submitted in response to EPA's RCRA 5 3007(a) Information Requ
. , , ",. ", " t - " " ' ii • y- ' ' t - • i• •
We appreciate your cooperation with regard to the proper ^'Trffiniti^n of our LX*-S30 fuel oil
and request that you reconsider your earlier categorization of this product as a hazardous waste
in light of all available information. If you have any additional questions or concerns, please
- bring tfiem to my attention at your earliest convenience. Your prompt review of this information
"and reconsideration of the Agency's past position with regard to LX*-830 is requested in light
.of the economic and business hardships currently experienced at Neville due to EPA's initial
determination.
; '' : Sincerely,
Attachments
cc: William D. Roper
Lawrence Falldn/EPA ?
Gale Campbell/PaDER >
Thomas F. McKnight
Vice President & General Counsel
1
S<11
-------
:^>_ :' • ' . •'.'•'•.' ' :,,. v
i UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY . ..•>',
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460 . -^
:..;•.,:. - -9441.1995(03) . . -5j
. • ' • '-^-i-
3 ?5i
-------
FILE COP
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, O.C. 20460
mill i |l i i i' i nil in * i i i i in - '•• in
"It
OFPICE Of
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPON
iii jjiijii
! ..... Ill
1 i| t
?EB 6 1995
M "i"!!!! Ill I'Vl'i! 'iill'iliiii'ji "')
Mr. Alan Perkins
Williams & Anderson
Twenty-Second Floor .
11,1 Center Street
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
l|lllllll P 111 III 11111 1 111 111 I II 111 II I II I II I III I 111 II I
Dear Mr. Perkins:
II
fl Jfc1
ft-
Thank 'you for your letter dated December 8, 1994, on behalf
of, Composite Leasing Corporation requesting clarification
regarding the regulatory status of recycled acrylic plastic dust
"under the Resources Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
Specifically,yourequest^^££en confirmation from the
Environmental Protection Agency (El'A) of ,your interpretation of
,howHRCiA applies ,to "acrylic..plastic dust 'that is generated from
Plastic" Media Bla'sti'ngHPMBJl and sent "toL India for use in'"the-
Manufacture pf acrylic" plastic sheets'. You state that you
consider theacrylic plastic dust to be excluded from RCRA
regulation unSex §261"12"(e) (i) as a secondary material that is
being used as an ingredient in an industrial process to make a
product. • " ..
iiii iiiiiiiiiiiliiiii 11111 n 11 iiiiiii 111111
nil iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiini • i in inn inn nil
As you .correctly note-,in. your letter, the exclusion provided
under §261.2(e) (i) for materials that are recycled as ingredients
is applicable only if the materials are not being reclaimed prior
tp use^ip^seSsfil"1 According to your letter, the acrylic plastic
dust must undergo several refinement' steps to produce the
•specification grade methylmetnacrylate monomer (MMA monomer) that
j^s used to-produce acrylic plastic sheets. The first step
involves heating the PMB dust in the presence of a molton lead
bath. In this process, the acrylic polymer is depolymerized to
produce MMA monomer and cadmium 'and chromium' present.in the PMB
dust are'partitioned'"off to the molton lead bath. The MMA
monomer is then further purified through distillation in order to
meet product specifications. The specification grade monomer is
then .used as an ingredient in the production of acrylic sheets. .
Under §261.1 (c) (;4) ,a.material is reclaimed if it is
processed to recover a"usable proa^vlct;j or ££ £t Is regenerated.
In the process you describe, the"PMB dust clearly undergoes
reclamation prior to its use as an ingredient to produce acrylic
Printed on Recycled P;
-------
•plastic sheets (i.e., recovery of the: monomer in;the first step •
and regeneration or removal of impurities, from the "-monomer in the
second step). The PMB.dust would therefore'not qualify for ;
exclusion from RCRA.regulation under §261.2 (e).' ^ ,-;. ;;i
Your letter also raises the question of whether the PMB dust 4
would.be considered a "sludge"'or a "spent material" under RCRA. i
This distinction is important, as you indicate, because RCRA "
provides an exclusion for characteristic sludges that are being
reclaimed, while spent materials being reclaimed are. subject to ;;
regulation under RCRA (see §261.2(c)(3)). A sludge, as defined ^
under 40 CFR §260.10, is "any solid, semi-solid, or liquid waste •''•"$
generated from a municipal wastewater treatment plant, or air " ?!
pollution control facility exclusive of the treated effluent from • , -S
a wastewater treatment plant." According to your letter,- an air . 41
filtration system is used as a means to. collect the acrylic • :^f
plastic dust. Since the primary purpose of the filtration, system :;1
is not air pollution control per se but rather collection of PMB . '•:"%
dust for further processing, the filtration system would not be • .*
considered an air pollution control device and the PMB dust would* ..-
therefore not be considered a' sludge as defined by the, f
regulations. . . • ." ..:••_ • • ,*•?;.
; 'A "spent material^/Is defined-under RCRA as "any material
that has been'^used and':'as a re'sult -of contamination can no longer ' ::
serve the purpose for'which it was produced without processing."
As clarified in the March 24, 1.994, Memorandum from Michael
Shapiro to the Regions, which you.cite, EPA has consistently
interpreted this definition to include "materials that have been
used and are no longer fit for use without being regenerated."
50 FR at 618 (January 4, 1985); 48 FR at 14476 (April 4, 1983).
The PMB dust clearly fits within the meaning of "spent-material"
as defined by RCRA and would therefore be regulated as such in
accordance with §261.2 (c) (3) . ' ":
In'summary, for reasons stated above, the PMB dust that is
collected by Composite Leaching Corporation.and sent to India for
use in the -manufacture of acrylic plastic sheets would be
considered a spent material being reclaimed. Because the
material is being reclaimed prior to use, it would not be
eligible for exclusion from RCRA under §261.2(e). Rather, as a .
spent material being reclaimed it would be subject to regulation
as a RCRA waste in accordance with §261.2(c)(3). •
Finally, I apologize for any.confusion caused by -conflicting
interpretations you may have received regarding the regulatory
status of this material. Generally, EPA-Regional offices and
States authorized to implement the RCRA program make
determinations regarding the requirements that apply in specific .
situations. However, in situations such as yours -where a number
of different interpretations have been received, a final
determination from EPA headquarters may be required.
-------
JT'lllllllllllllllllll^llJIIIIII11!111
iiijl!'",hi'i Hi"11 iiiiiiiiiiiii ii:,,,:; «i;i in vihiin
111 ilMljliJ1:!!1"!!!!!!!!!;1;!!!!!!!,!!!!! "rtVillH!!! imr, alii "',"l!''"' W I',:,!:1 "LiKrilllin lllli: i $$& • i: s: "^ ••-,. ^vn., rM fttt*'«9liJ*4i
,-
..... ;, f ...... K^^ti Hi,
....... llwllliii; ,/' :;, lillllllili, 11,11;!, i ,":iil!;!:!!i!,!11 1,,:;!' i/rHI fill
'!," ........ i<,!«niiiiiiiiiiii :;,,;! ..... ",",'' ...... 'K 'ilk,!, ......... ii,:!,: * ...... i, :,
Mb;,1' Hi! |i" i nil i,11 lilHiiiiiiiiiiuii''^''^!'^!^!!! mi
' : ! '- vlI
I .
-------
REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION
. OF THE REGULATORY STATUS OF
RECYCLED ACRYLIC PLASTIC DUST UNDER
THE RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT
Submitted To•
Michael H. Shapiro, Director
Office of Solid Waste
United States Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street, S.W. (M2101) .
Washington, D.c. 20460
Submitted Bv
G. Alan Perkins
Williams & Anderson .
Twenty-Second Floor
111 Center Street
Little Rock, AR 72201
(501) 372-0800
Nancy D. Tammi
Beveridge- & Diamond, p.c.
1350 I Street, N.w.
Suite.700.
Washington, D.C. 20005
(202) 789-6059
Date Submitted;
December 8, 1994
-------
Ill |iii{iliiii 1111 IIP PHI 1111 i 11 mm Hill i iiiiiii iiiiiip i iiiiiiiiiiiiii 1111 iiiiiiA 11 n i n i n i in in iiiiiiiiii i in
•Illllllllllllllllllllll lllllllllll Ill l||l|llllll llll||||lllllllll|l||||jl 111 lllPlllllllllll 111 l|l 111 111 lib !f "
r . .
Ill IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII lllllllllll I 111 lllllllllll III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII lllllllllll I II lllllIB I 111 III 111 II11 111 111 III 111 . lllllllllll1
December 8, 1994
VIA HAND DELIVERY
Michael H. Shapiro, Director. . ."-,•'
Office i of Solid ^aste '."" : , • :
United ' states Environmental ' • '.': • "' .
Protection Agency '(M2101)
401 M Street*, S.W. " V .' . "• .'
Washington, D.c. 20460 .
Re: Request for Clarification of the Regulatory Status of
i 'Recycled Acrylic Plastic Dust Under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act '
iiiii i ii 11
; :": " ': " : i;:" ;" : ' "" . ' * T
Dear Mr. ShapJ.ro:
r • On behalf of Composite Leasing Corporation ("Composite"), we
write to request r-pn-FirTna-hinnfrom the 'United' States '- '*
v, Enviaronmerital Protection Agency ("EPA", or "the Agency") that
* acrviic plasfcict dust ^resulting from the/.Plastic Media Blasting
('fPMB") of paints and coatings from aircraft and aircraft '
components (hereinafter "PMB dust")is not a "solid waste" within
the meaning of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(MRCRAM) when used as an ingredient in the manufacture of acrviic
jxLastic sheets. This issue warrants the attention of'EPA .
Headquarters inslight of ggnflicting determinations issued by EPA^
Regions TVf VTr 'and VIII ^concerning the regulatory status o-F
recycled PMB dust, yhich grtTng»-hiTnftS o-yVnVi-i+f i-Vir. -pr-rc^ mryir1"11-y
ghSyrarrfceristic ("Tg"). As discussed in detail below, the
tmmMU SecYcling of PMB dust involves "use or reuse" of that material ...as...
an £ngredient ^jthin the 'meaning of 40 C~. F".""R~. j|" 261 .""2 (e) ("'i') ("iV,
and "|hus the PMB dust is not a solid waste from its point of
cfen'eiration. Accordingly, PMB dust is not subject to regulation
„ as a,|' hazaEdoHs saste, even if the material exhibits a
characteristic of hazardous waste. See 40 C.F.R. § 261.1(a).
, 'r'. • ' ,..; , ...... . • ' •
I. Background. .' -.. "• • '
T
A. Description of PMB Technology
PMB is a process that is used widely by the U.S. military
and the airline industry for the safe and efficient removal of
paints and coatings from aircraft and aircraft components, and
other machinery and equipment. It is a pneumatic process similar
;to sandblasting, but uses engineered plastic abrasive instead of.
sand. The plastic abrasive is harder than the coating to be
removed, yet softer than the underlying surface, thereby allowing
-------
Michael H. Shapiro
December 8^ 1994
Page 2 -
?ed repeatedly without
(~*^3SSr Sa'SS^&i? «» c*se
aggressive abrasion of santoSstiig
. -. • . • '*<%&•, ?*-.?v£"T;:: ,-•••
damaging the surface
of non-steel^surfaces
• v^ y^ ^^4* ^U ^K. ^ ._. — .*_ . A _
chloride-based
'T7'"i5ftSi*'J
methylene
ssrrss,
Of airf ranes
«-lng
2;. -ss :
Uth
of^three enclosed "blast books'"
under air pressure throughTblit
stripped. The plastic abrasive
particles and other material
thmesh ^^
o
smaller than one-half the si£5 of
and is air-washed and classified to
plastic abrasive particle!
coatings "
Base,
confinis
t2 b£asive js applied
? 6 su^face b*ing
along with paint
;1^ **<****. to
Jj^al-that is
through the mesh,
recover for reuse those
suf f lci**t size to remove
and
.._ _.. ^^'Ssr^^wsis sss
due to the inclusion of minute paL? ^?^°aiUm and/02r ca^ium
.&•*•
used 40-80 times
-------
IIH^ noiiwtt . • . - '' <<|<><|<
H. Shapiro
December 8, 1994 ' " " • •-;/. tr.t -•><..•• •
. Page 3 _ > -r , •' •' '"'• *:'
iiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiii i ••• • • , •
the manufactm-g O-F a^n^1r n?^^ ^brct- 2/' n^i^ tn *.'.''
5 BM " ::,:: :~i™S: r:S:iili£se in the 2anufac|:ure of acrylic plastic sheets.
•SS'.fass.s" ijsrs,"?- >»s S3.,tffi" ~—
" 2/ A Process flow diagram is provided as Attachment l
-
-------
Michael H. Shapiro - _ L _ ^-__ . ___
December 8, 1994. .' " : ' - ':'•'•• .-•••••'• • '•'"^-"TO^:"^'/-'" v-:'"" •
Page 4 ..".-. .- '• •• :-. - '•'"-^-^ *•> -•-;;'•-•••
consists of organic chemical impurities resulting from incomplete
conversion of the PMB material.^ These impurities "impart a -
blackish color to the MMA monomer stream, which is undesirable
because the MMA monomer is used by Globe Plastics to^produce 'r-
^transparent acrylic plastic sheets. Further refinement of the
liquid MMA monomer product therefore is necessary-in order-to•----—
meet product specifications for the acrylic plastic sheets. The
1-irp-i-irl ^TM& -tnrSnrvmoT- -i e pirr-i -Fi ori fhi-o^gfr distillation and ( ,
recondensed to liquid form. 'The organic chemical still bottoms
resulting from the purification of MMA monomer are routed to the
oil-fired furnace used to heat the molten lead bath, where they
are burned as a supplemental fuel.-'. ;
In the final step of the production process, MMA monomer is
combined with catalysts and coloring agents. The resulting
mixture is poured into dies and cured in water baths. The
typical cure time is three hours, but varies depending on the
thickness of the acrylic sheets being produced.' After curing,
the acrylic sheets are covered with paper in preparation for
shipment to customers. . • " •
Si! C. Previous EPA and State Regulatory Determinations
;> : Concerning Recycled PMB Dust * . '' ;
Prior to awarding a contract to Composite for the above-
described PMB recycling program, Hill AFB sought a. regulatory
determination from the Utah Department of Environmental Quality
("Utah DEQ") that the recycled PMB dust would not be subject to
regulation as a solid and hazardous waste.& After an
extensive review of the process by which PMB dust is produced and
handled, beginning at Hill AFB and ending at Globe Plastics, Utah
DEQ concluded that the proposed recycling program constituted
"use or reuse" of PMB dust as an ingredient in an industrial
process. See Letter dated February 3, 1992 from Dennis R. Downs,
Director, Division of Solid and Hazardous Waste, Utah DEQ,- to
Col. William M. Henabray, Office of the Staff Judge Advocate,
£>/ The volume of still bottoms, consisting of various
esters, is about one percent of the volume of MMA'produced, and
'comprises only a small fraction of one percent of the fuel for
the furnace. " . . " :
§./ Hill AFB also requested that a pre-award environmental
survey of Globe Plastics be performed by the Defense Logistics
Agency ("DLA"). DLA visited Globe Plastics in September, 1991,
and concluded that "the Firm is environmentally responsible to
recycle methacrylate plastic dust contaminated with chromium and'
cadmium." DLA, Environmental Survey of Globe Plastic, Bombay,
India (Oct. 3, 1991) (Attachment 2). .
-------
i UP! II" 11 II"!"'!«"( L "!"""' "f ll|«il!«
tsy
'
• ii ••
Michael H. Shapiro
Deceinlaer 8, 1994
Page 5 .
. ....
_____ Hill Air Force Base (-1992 Dtah.DEQ^tter^ (f talent
ur^n^v-aTi^iiTn from Micnaej. &napiror ua.a.«=www.*. f ^^ ^ Recrions I~*
1994
, does
and
..... Material! .......... , .................. f^e IcU
at -i.fi/ - -. - • : '
...... i _ .. -. • , • . ............. . ............................................ ; ......... . .............. , ....................... :
[[[ V [[[ «« [[[ w ............................ f ^4.4-e^f r^a+-*>d June 24, 1992 from Dennis R.
i ^n-JHol^iSision ol lolW and Hazardous Waste, Utah DEO,
!-',:-*?-|™li. w!ma»'M? HenaSay* Sfflfl. of the Staff Judge Advocate,
' [[[ Sill Air Force .......... Base (Attachment 4) . - ; .. .
C.F.R. § 26i.2(e)(l)(i). . •
-------
Michael H. Shapiro , . '
December 8, 1994 . '
Page 6 - '
In response to Region VIII's April 11, 1994 Letter. Utah DEO
informed Hill AFB that it had "reevaluated" the PMB dust
"recycling process: ' ' :. J -.->"" ., .'.:,.••... :.-",- .-.,.. v;,-E;^*.^^ : •; ; . •
[t]he spent beadblast material generated by [Hill AFB] must
be processed to recover a usable product/ methylmethacryl'ate
monomer. This is achieved using a distillation process in
.India. This is clearly a form of reclamation.
Letter dated April 27, 1994 from Dennis R. Downs, Executive
Secretary, Utah Solid and Hazardous Waste Control Board, to James
R. Van Qrman, Director, Environmental Management Directorate,
Hill Air Force Base ("1994 Utah DEQ Letter") (Attachment 7).
Based on this letter, and Region VIII's April 11, 1994 Letter,
Hill AFB terminated its contract with Composite, and began
handling all PMB dust that exhibits the TC in accordance with
applicable Subtitle C requirements.
separate determinations. EPA Regions IV and VI also have
determined that the recycling of PMB dust: involv
.
Region IV concluded that "the cracking operation will regenerate
the /blasting media,'! and thus ."meets the definition of
reclamation in 40"c.F.R. 26i.l(c) (4f. " "Letter dated August 11,
1993 from John E. Dickinson, P.E., Chief, RCRA Compliance
Section, EPA Region IV, to Jerome H. Rhodes, at 3 ("Region IV
Letter") (Attachment 8). Region VI determined that the
depolymerization of PMB dust to produce MMA monomer is a "heat
reactor distillation process," and thus. "[t]he. facility is
clearly 'processing' the plastic dust to recover a usable
product." Letter dated September 16, 1993 from George R.
Alexander, .Jr., Regional Counsel, EPA Region VI, to G. Alan
Perkins, at 2. ("Region VI Letter") (Attachment 9) . Region VI
also determined, howevpr, that t
"sludge" because.it is "retrieved through air filtration." id.
Accordingly, Region VI concluded that the dust is not subject to
regulation when "reclaimed." id. - " --- :
II. Discussion
A. PMB Dust is Used as an Ingredient in the Manufacture of
Acrylic Plastic Sheets Without Being Reclaimed _ ___
Under EPA's regulations, .materials are not solid wastes when
they are recycled by being "used or reused as ingredients in an
industrial process to make a product, provided the materials are
not being reclaimed." 40 C.F.R. § 261.2 (e) (1) (i) - For example,
"the use of chemical industry still bottoms as feedstock" to make
new products is a form of recycling that does not involve solid
wastes. 50 Fed. Reg. 614, 637 (Jan. 4, 1985). See also Letter
dated March 22, 1988 from Sylvia K. Lowrance, Director, Office of
-------
Michael H. Shapiro
llllllll!llii!lllll:ilFll!1!!llllll:lllll,'i:!!l1|llllllllllllllll!ll«^ 'IIIIPII ..... f« ....... ,. JIILI .............. ....... :, ......
........ 'December 8, 1994
'
!ft'&ai$£s?sigB iffiswii!! &<».*! i « • * - =: • ~
tfliilJlgo'Jid wasteV- EPA to Hyman B^ura (copper clilbride and copper
•KISHS^^S^SS ^ISliM®.,, fcyr^^**?*1? used to produce copper sulf ate _and
'iSc^p|^ lydroxTd'e' are not solid wastes).' In such cases," r;i ', . •
,;; jcom'piaSehts of the secondary materials, which "function as raw
50 Fed. Reg. at 637, become incorporated into a new
product.
IZ^'im^In contrast, if "distinct components of the [secondary]
Ill'^aiilrlal are recovered as separate end products," 40 C.F.R.
§2^1.l(c)(5)(i), the material"is being "reclaimed," rather than
usesd as a ingredient. 50 Fed. Reg. at 637. For example, the
recovery of lead from a spent lead-acid battery is a form of
reclamation (i."e. recovery of a usable product). 40 C.F.R.
§ 261.l(c)(4). Secondary materials that are "processed to remove
contaminantsinawaythat restores them to their original usable
condition^ " sucE as spent solvents that are regenerated, also are
,'sai,d to be "reclaimed." 50 Fed. Reg. at 633. See also 40 C.F.R.
')§ 261.
light of the foregoing, "it is evident that the recycling
tof PMB .d~ust to produce acrylic plastic sheets is properly
i characterised; as "use or .x;euseir -of the dust as ah, ingredient,
' iraiher thari "reclamation" of that material. "Distinct '
'components" of PMB dust—: which is comprised primarily of
' acfylic plastic particles — are not recovered as separate end
.products. Instead, PMB dust, an acrylic polymer, is "cracked" or
depolymerized into its constituent elements, molecules. of MMA^
monomer, and those constituents .are then catalytically recombined
along with coloring agents to produce a new product — .acrylic
plastic sheets. .
i ••
. ...... j ............................. .The, recycling of PMB dust is analogous to the recycling of
spent ............... sulfurfc ............ acid ............... to .............. p^Q^ce virgin sulf uric acid . — a process
that "the Agency ... does not think . . . involves
recTiiilEion. " 50 Fed, Reg. at 634. Spent sulf uric acid is
burned, to derive sulfur as sulfur dioxide gas. This gas is .
.;__^____ .................. _._____j___ ............... ._.___„£££.. ............. ,_g ............... Absorbed ""into existing
; ...... sulf uric acid as part of the same' industrial process. 48 Fed.
.................... 14 ...... ~, ...... JvT^ ............ 14 ..... ~ ..... 487 n;30 (April 4, 1983). After a review of the
acid recycling process, EPA. determined that:
process does not constitute reclamation because the
....... sulf uric acid is neither regenerated . (impurities are
removed, from, the spent sulf uric acid to make_ it
.................... nor ............... recovered ................ (acid values are not recovered from
acid).- ' It is used. as an ingredient.
"S' ~ ..... J|
-------
Michael. H. Shapiro
December 8, 1994
Page 8 "\ - .
as spent sulfuric acid is converted into suif ur dioxide
f °1:irse of Producing virgin sulfuric acid, acrylic plastic
PMB dust is converted into MMA monomer for use in the production :
SL^^i10 Plastfc: The MMA monomer produced by the cracking of
PMB dust is "purified," and then "catalytically converted" to
create acrylic plastic sheets. See 48 Fed. Reg. at 14,487 n. 30.
MMA monomer is as much an "ingredient" in the -production of
acrylic plastic sheets as sulfur dioxide gas is an "ingredient"'
in the production . of sulfuric acid. PMB dust is neither
regenerated (impurities are not removed from the acrylic plastic
to make it reuseable) nor recovered (acrylic plastic is not
, recovered from the PMB dust) . .
The recycling of PMB dust to produce acrylic plastic sheets
does not constitute "reclamation." PMB dust is not "processed to
recover a usable product." 40 C.F.R. § 261. 2 (c) (4). That
f concept is applicable to recycling situations where a "distinct
component" of the recycled material is retrieved (recovered) as
an "end product, " such as "when metals are recovered from metal-
containing secondary materials." 40 C.F.R. § 261. 2(c) (5) fi)
fS°« iS ^S-*?* Case With the recyclin9 of PMB dust. MMA monomer
ls..not^a "Distinct component" of the PMB dust, the latter of
.which is comprised of .particles of .acrylic plastic polymer, paint
chips, and other materials blasted from the aircraft surface!
Instead, MMA monomer is a new chemical substance. Thus the
assertions of Region VI and Utah DEQ that Globe Plastics
processes PMB dust to "recover" a usable product are wrong. See
Region VI Letter at 2; 1994 Utah DEQ Letter at l.S/ PMB dust - '
is instead used to produce a usable product.
Finally, PMB dust is not "regenerated" by Globe Plastics
Sjie. 40 C.F.R. § 26.1. 2 (c) (4). PMB dust is not "restorerdl to
fits] original, usable condition" when it is used to manufacture
acrylic plastic sheets. Unlike a spent solvent, which is
"regenerated" through the removal of impurities, PMB dust is
chemically transformed to produce a new material. Indeed, the
9_/ Moreover, contrary to the assertions of EPA Region VI
and the Utah DEQ, the cracking of PMB dust to yield MMA monomer
i3 J°££ ?°f? °f 'Distillation." See Region VI Letter at 2; 1994
Utah DEQ Letter, at l. Cracking, or "depolymerization, " involves
.tne "decomposition of macromolecular compounds into relatively
simple compounds." McGraw-Hill, Dictionary of Scientific and
Terms. <4th ?*• "89) at 513. In contrast, - -
. . ,
"distillation" is defined as "[t]he process. of producing a gas or
vapor from a liquid by heating the liquid in a vessel and
collecting and condensing the vapors into liquids." Id. at 561.
A? these definitions illustrate, depolymerization and -
distillation are distinct processes. -
-------
•I ill ii i iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii in 11 . iii n n ' - . ' "^.' •.
||l|i iiiiii! y| inn in in inn i iLiiii i inn i i in n i iiiiiiini iiiiiiiinnn i i MI iii mi' ' i . ' . j ' *
I .
Michael H. Shapiro • _-. :'•-:'.'"•
Deciember --. 19g^ - ^.,, , ,. ^. ., , ._ ^., .-_',;••-_ ^'
Page 9 . \ - - . . •;•.,.,'
„ ,,;";' aeare removal of the paint chips and -other matter ' "contaminating"'
*, . *;, the 'PMB dust'would not restore the dust to"! its "original usable
t condition" because the PMB dust particles would remain too small
for use as blasting media. Accordingly, the conclusion of EPA
Region IV that "the cracking operation will regenerate the
t blasting media" is .plainly incorrect. Region IV Letter at 3.
In summary, Utah DEQ's original determination that the
t recycling of PMB dust to produce acrylic plastic sheets
constitutes "use or reuse" of the dust as 'aningredient was
correct. The recycling of PMB dust is analogous to the recycling
of spent sulfuric acid, a process that EPA has concluded does not
involve "reclamation^" PMB dust is not processed to recover a
usable product', nor is-it'regenerated. ' It is instead used to
produce a usable product through use as an ingredient.
• ' jin " :lin an industrial process to make a product without reclamation.
"' " " yHowever, EPA'.s regulations provide further that materials "used
as ingredients" may, nevertheless be deemed solid wastes if they
are: (l) "used in a manner constituting disposal"; (2) "burned
for energy recovery, used to produce a fuel, or contained in
fuels"; (3) "accumulated speculatively"; or (4) identified at 40
, , , CflitsiSif £ 261i.i2(dJ_(l]i-(2)i as "inherently waste like materials."
'40 C.F'.S. "§ "26i'r"2 ("i) ("2"") I As d~emonstxate3 below", PMB" dust does'
not fall within any of those categories, and thus satisfies the
criteria for exclusion from the definition of solid waste.
First, PMB dust is not "used in a manner constituting
disposal." 40 C.F.R. § 261.2(e)(2)(i). PMB dust itself is not
^applied to or placed on the land',"" see 40 C.F.R. § 266.20, nor
is PMB dust used to produce a product for land application (e.g. f
fertilizer€asphalt, cement). Instead, PMB dust is used to
produce MMA monomer, which then is reacted to produce, acrylic
plastic sheets.. Neither MMA monomer nor acrylic plastic sheets
!lare "applied to the landi" • . • .
Second., PMB dust is not ^burned for energy recovery, used to
produce a fuel, or contained in fuels." 40 C.F.R.
§ 261.2(e)(2)(ii). PMB dust is depolymerized — not "burned" —
to.produce MMA monomer in the presence of a molten iead 'bath,
which serves as a-heat transfer agent. This is a non-combustion
i process, and energy is not recovered. Moreover, PMB dust is not
"used to produce a 'fuel" or ''."contained in fuels." PMB dust, is
'falsest "only to produce MMA sfonomer^ all of which Is used, to • •
manufacture acrylic plastic sheets. Although the organic
-------
Michael H. Shapiro • ",....--•.'••,
December 8, 1994
Page 10 . . .- :
chemical still bottoms from the purification of MMA monomer, are
burned as a supplemental fuel in the oil-fired furnace used to
heat the molten lead bath, those still bottoms result from.the
distillation of a new chemical (MMA monomer), not PMB dust.^
Third, PMB dust is not "accumulated speculatively." 40
C.F.R. § 261.2(e) (2) (ill). PMB dust is stored at Hill AFB for
only a short period of time (no more than 3 months), until enough
material is available to fill a shipping container. When the *
dust reaches Globe Plastics, it is used immediately. Any storage
of PMB dust that occurs is attributable solely to the capacity
limitations of the three furnaces, each of which can hold up to
3000 pounds of dust- at any given time.^'
Finally, PMB dust is not "inherently waste-like" within the
meaning of 40 C.F.R. § 261.2(d). PMB dust is not subject to the
F020, F021, F022, F023, F026, or F028 listings, nor is PMB dust
fed to a halogen acid furnace. -
In conclusion, PMB dust used as an ingredient in the
manufacture-of acrylic plastic sheets satisfies the criteria for
exclusion from the definition of solid waste. 40 C.F.R.
§ 261.2(e)(2). Therefore, PMB dust is not subject to regulation
as a hazardous waste. -
* * *
For the reasons set forth above, the recycling of PMB dust
involves "use or reuse" of that material as an ingredient within
the meaning of 40 C.F.R. § 261.2(e)(1)(i), and thus the PMB dust
10/ indeed, it makes little sense to characterize PMB dust
as a solid waste by reason of the burning of MMA monomer still
bottoms for energy recovery. If the still bottoms instead were
disposed of (such as by means of incineration), there would be no
question whether the PMB dust is subject to regulation as a solid
waste by virtue of 40 C.F.R. § 261i2(e)(2)(ii). Facilities such
as Globe Plastics should not be penalized for engaging in the
beneficial use, rather than disposal, of secondary materials
resulting from production processes that use other secondary
materials as ingredients. If, however, EPA determines that the
burning of MMA still bottoms causes the PMB dust to be considered
a solid waste, Globe Products is prepared to cease burning the
still bottoms, and to instead dispose of .that material off-site
in accordance with applicable Indian law.
ll/ The use of PMB dust to manufacture acrylic plastic
sheets is easily accomplished within the "75 percent" turnover
requirement of 40 C.F.R. § 261.1(c)(8).
-------
' t
" ~ ..... Hichael .......... I'l ................ siiapiro
.....................
1994,
December 8,,,
.......... : ..... Page 11 " ^ • • • •; ' ^ , _ "" '
'is jiriabji* ...... to ......... regulation ..... ^V'sbiid. .......... (or7 hazardous) ...... ;w^ste':from
its' point of generation.- . .; , / V, • ,
^ = ^^^^ written confirmation
listed below.
Thank you for your consideration of this matter.
Sincerely,
..... .
,
........... 3';
G'. Alan perKins ' .
Williams^ Anderson
Twenty-Second Floor
111 Center Street
Little Rock, AR 72201
(501) 372-0800
Nancy iy. Tammi
,Beveridge &.Diamond, P.C.
^3.350 I Street, N.W., ;
Suite 700
Washington, D.C. 20005
(202) 789-6059
iii ii in 11 ii ii
enclosures
A
i in iiiiiiiin 11 in iiiiii in -
T
i ill i i
ii i IP 1 1 iii) i mi 1 1 ,
iiiiii'i iiiiiiiii i ii hi in i ii i iii (iiiiiii 1
IIIH^^ 1111 III 111 III i III I III I l|lllll II I
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIII II1 IIIIII 11111II f
IIIIIII II IIIIIIIII
IIIIIII II lllllll
1 111
II lllllll
111 III 1 II I 111 • '
i i 111 mi ii 11111 iiiiiiiiiii i nil i
-------
FILE COPY
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460 .
-& ISCS-* ' 9441.1995(04)
OP 'S'
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE ,'
'''" Mr. John W. Osborne •'..'••'
Manager of Safety and . >
Environmental Quality , ... ,
United Beechcraft, .Inc. . . • .
• P.O. Box 2966 - •
Wichita, Kansas 67201-2966 -
Dear Mr. Osborne: .
Thank you for your, letter dated October 18, 1994, requesting
an interpretation regarding the regulatory status of residual
i aviation.fuels that are burned for energy recovery.
• .As you correctly note in your letter, off-specification
; fuels, ^including gasoline, '/jet fuel,-, kerosene, idiesel, etc. that
; exhibit a hazardous characteristic and are. burned for energy-
recovery are excluded from regulation under RCRA as commercial
chemical"products. The RCRA regulations provide that commercial
chemical products are not'-solid wastes when used as fuels (i.e.,
burned for energy recovery) if that is their intended purpose (40
CFR 261.2(cj (2) (ii)) . . -
According to your letter, there are a number of different
ways in which the residual aviation fuels are generated by your
company (e.g., during maintenance of the aircraft, as a result of
spills, etc.). You ask whether the manner in which the residual
fuels are generated is a factor" in determining whether they meet
the definition of off-specification commercial chemical products
under RCRA. The answer, in most cases, is no. The manner in
; which the fuels become off-specification is not generally a
' factor in determining how they are regulated. One exception is
when the fuels.have been mixed with or contaminated by non-fuel
listed or characteristic hazardous wastes. In that case, the
• off-specification fuel would -be regulated as a hazardous waste
under RCRA even-when burned for. energy recovery.
There are also a number of potential uses for the off-
specification aviation fuels that you generate, all of which
involve burning for energy recovery, according to.your letter.
- The residual aviation fuel may be upgraded to specification by .
blending it with other types of fuel (e.g., gasoline, diesel,
Printer! an Recvcied Paoer
-------
|ll l| It pi Ik, Itai i%Jlk«!i
f f Up Jl I J I- J|| J
nn ii| iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii ipnniiiiiii niiiiipiiiiiii
" i ' "
• i i'
etc.) and then used-to fuel aircraft or it may be used to power
boilers and industrial furnaces. '•'Your question is whether these,
uses .would be considered "use within tie intended purpose" as -;
define3 by RCRA7 The answer is'yes. As long as the residual
fuels are being legitimately burned for energy recovery, they
would be considered as being used for their intended purpose.
EPA does not/ Histinguish between'different types of burning for
energy arecovSr^ for purposes of determining'the ^gulatory status
of residual fuels'under §261.2 (c) (2) (i.i) .
Itis important to note that EPA Regions and States
authorizedto implement the hazardous waste program make •
determinations regarding the requirements -that apply to specific
materialsandfacilities. Some States have programs more
stringentthanthe Federal hazardous waste program. I hope this
letter addresses your concerns.. If you have additional
questions, please call Becky'Daiss of my staff at (202) 260-8718,
I,
iif
Sincerely,
,;V-
Michael J. Petruska, Chief
Regulatory Development Branch
• i,
-------
United Beechcraft. Inc. / ? "765201
PO BOX 2366 '
Wictwta KS 67201 -2966
United ^eechcraft
A BEECH AIRCRAFT COMPANY
October 18, 1994
Mr. David Bussard, Director
Characterization and Assessment Division
EPA . - ••• . ••''.. . • • - • "
401MStS.W.
Washington, D.C. 20406 '
Dear Mr. Bussard:
• - . •
We would like to obtain an interpretation of the status of our residual/waste stream of
aviation gasoline and jet fuel. '
In a letter (copy attached) from Mr. Devereaux Barnes to Mr. Joe Haak a similar
situation is discussed and interpreted. We want to be sure of any extension of the
interpretation to our particular situation so that we remain in compliance with the
regulations.
To put the interpretation request m context, our company is comprised of 17 6n-airport
faculties that provide a variety of services to the aviation community. As a result of the
services and due to the stringent fuel quality specifications that must be adhered to in
order to ensure safety of flight, a residual fuel is generated.
There are generally four situations that may generate this residual fuel as the following
.describes. . , . . -
1. In the process of quality control of the fuel, we sump small quantities of fuel at
various points in the storage-to-aircraft fueling system. The result is a residual
fuel that has some water from condensation, rust particles and so on.
2. At times in the maintenance of the airplanes, fuel lines or tanks are required to
be emptied in order to accomplish the needed repair task. If the fuel can not be
returned to the aircraft it came from, it is collected as a residual fuel.
3. In the process of receiving, storing and transferring of fuels or in the maintenance
of the fuel system or aircraft refuelers small drippages result in the generation of
residual fuel.
Beechcraft
-------
'Tiflii iT.rWrvLi -*.v ^"^-^-.-.^i
111 II 111 Illlllllll III IIIIII 111 II 111 III II 111 11 I IIIIII 111 II I II IIIIII IIIIII
Mr. David Bussard
111 llllllr 1 IKS* •• iSl,!1''! Mil'::" lilllH^^^ :f •111.! ' ii .) tr it" < i i. i " • ' « •• ii • , ', ,• » i' '-i ';':;,;,.;:,':•:,: . ::; :: ;,„ i : • ; •. ;:i:;isl ii,:;..:';; - ;,: .:;; :<:4«: : „•': ,, ;::;,;;::;: ,mn» ' "ii i PHI ' i n rr • „ „ „ «„•,
^=:l~n:'":::';';!;; :=^^^^^^ material to absorb the fuel. ' ;_'......• •:.,
We make note of two statements in the letter previously referenced. The first "a ^
comnigrjiil ^ejn|c|l, product is not a solid waste if it itself is a fuel" ... "it is implicit in
the" rjue^thaTuie jfltrie —--—^ng applies to commercial chemical products that are not
1 listed*. Secondly, in the following paragraph "Although the reclaimed commercial
chemical grojuct B burned for energy recovery it is not a 'solid waste because this was its '/;
intended p5jp0"s-e's-" • • - • • ; : - • / . • ^
While the McDonnel Douglas off-spec fuel would be used to produce apparently more §
aviation fuel our residual fuel would not be used forj^tspedfic purpose. However, it '
would be used for fuel, i.e. energy recovery. How broadly defined is "fuel" within the
context of "intended purpose"? Aviation fuel only for aviation related purposes?
t • ,'• : - . • : ' '": * - ''.
t We have found our residual fuel could be used in three different ways as a fuel. %
ji • M: , „,',',,' ' . • i / r't
1. Our residual fuel is not up to aviation fuel specifications, but it is acceptable when
:::" ::: - -::: ; I"" •' • ":::: blerideii with other types of fuel, elgT ^^0^^ dies^ etc.} and it is used'within
the context of that fuel's intended purpose. , . '
2. It could be used in kilns, boilers, generators as a fuel to power this equipment's
use in a production process of some kind.
3. The fuel soaked clean-up mateiial has "enough Btu value'to Be isel 'as a"fu'enb
' [ | I niB kilns, boilers, etc.
Does how. the residual fuel end up being used as a fuel make a difference in the
interpretation of "intended purpose"?
It would be a fair, statement to make that if 100 percent pure' aviation fuel were
delivered instead of the residual fuet the pure product would not be handled
substantially Sjf&rexit by the fuel user - it is just fuel to them.
i - . • - ' '
We would make a follow-on assumption the receiving process or facility would not need
to have a Part B RCRA permit, provided the Agency saw our residual fuel as being used
for its intended purpose.' ; ' ' •
It may be helpful to summarize our questions after having interwoven our specific
situation with questions and issues. •
-------
Mr. David Bussard • ~ -......_:.-._... - n ___.„„
Page -3-
October 18,1994 . - -
L How does your Agency's interpretation of "fuel" and "intended purpose" view our
residual fuel?
2. Does the interpretation change based on how the residual fuel was derived based
on the four general situations? .
3. Does the interpretation change depending on how the residual fuel is used as a
fuel in the end process?
4. Assuming your interpretation is that our residual fuel is a "fuel" and not a
hazardous waste, then it would not be necessary for it to be handled and
accumulated at our sites as a hazardous waste or dispose at a RCRA permitted
• site. Is that assumption correct?
Hopefully, this has given you all the pertinent information to the issues. If something
has been overlooked please feel free to write or call me at (316) 676-7657. We do
appreciate your attention as we are concerned about conducting our business in the
proper manner. -.;.....': .-.''
John W. Osborne
Manager of Safety and
Environmental Quality
United Beechcraft, Inc.
JWOrvlb
Attachment
-------
nil in iiiiii
jatiii:
i
ill i
«4m
iiiiii i iiiiii|i iiiiriiiiiiiiiii in
i I i (1 in I iilllll (IIIIIII I '
I
ill i ri Iiiiii ill i III 11 nil i linn nil11
I
' i
h]
i
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Ill III 11 I II IIIIII 111
ill
" III
11 III II l|
II II ill III I
111 I Iilllll I ill
If?
-------
/s\
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
' 9441.1995(05)
•V
' ' "'-* . ' '
•"•-•.. OFRCSOF
, „ . QENERALCOUNSa
171995
SDBJSCTt Interpretation of Industrial Wastewater Discharge
clusion From the^Def inition of Solid Waste
Lisa K, .
Associate Gene^Sl^Counsel .
Solid Waste and Emergency Response Division (2366)
TO: Waste Management Division Directors, Regions I-x
,„* «Thls aenoranau» is to clarify that the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) requirements apply to discharges of
leachate into groundwater from leaking waste management units,
even when the groundwater provides a direct hydrblogic connection
to a nearby surf ace water of the United Stated Th? definition
of solid waste in RCRA section 1004(27) excludes certain
industrial discharges which are point sources subject to Bermita
SSff-^01*?1 ^ater "iS (C»A); and EPA has said3?St CW^ * .
jurisdiction (under section 402) extends to point source :
discharges to groundwater where there is a direct hydroioaic ~
connection between the point source and nearby surface waters of
the United states. However, discharges of leJchate f rom wSte
management units to groundwater are not excluded from the '^
definition of solid waste in RCRA section 1004(27), because' the
exclusion extends only to "traditional," pipe outfall-type point
source discharges, and not to discharges Spstream of that pSint?
(This memorandum interprets the meaning of "point source
purposes of '
-«. *- RCRA,section 1004 (27) excludes from the definition of solid
waste "solid or dissolved materials in . . .industrial
-------
•••. ,'. • • •' *
"
,, .,:, , j tffction 40*) of the Clean Water Act J." • Por 'the purposes of the
! l! " • "" /:* RCKA program, EPA has consistently interpreted the language
"jpo»at sources subject jfcp. permits under [section 402 of the Clean
• ,-L , «M g, ;.»$££?. Act]" to mean point sources that should hav« a NPDES permit
.; - , =% J» place, whether in fact they do car not.. Under EPA's • • •
•interpretation of the "subject to" language, a facility that
s should, but does not, have the proper NPDXS permit is in
?:i!!yiplatipn of the, CWA, not RCRA. • ' • . • - -
• j ..... ......... " ............ ...... • ........ In. £i:i1.C2:pret.£ng
at
• ............ . i
implementing this exclusion, the Agency
&** following materials are ^not solid wastes for 'the 'purpose
• * • Industrial wastewater. discharges that are point source
, discharges subject to regulation under section 402 of the
Clean Water Act, as amended. ~
EPA's interpretation of the rule's, narrow scope is set , out
an explanatory "Comment" that also appears in the Code of
.federal Regulations following the final rule language:
This exclusion applies only to the actual point source
discharge. It does not exclude industrial vastewaters while
ar» feiinq collected, stored or traatad
. .
•discharge, nor does it exclude sludges that are generated by
industrial wastewater treatment. .
40 C.I.R. S 261. 4 (a) (2) (comment) (emphasis added). This
explanatory comment to the rule emphasizes that the exclusion is
a Modest and narrow one. Moreover, the comment reflects EPA's
intent, at the time it promulgated the rule, that the exclusion
apply solely to the. traditional pipe outfall-type situation
(i.e., ultimate release to waters of the United States) . As EPA
explained in the preamble: . .. ' - -. ,
The obvious purpose of the industrial point source discharge
.exclusion in section 1004(27) was to avoid dupl.icatiye
regulation of point source discharges under, RCRA and the
Clean Water Act. without such a provision, the discharge of
would be "disposal"-: of .
solid waste, and potentially subject to regulation under
both the Clean Water, Act and RCRA Subtitle C. These >
considerations do not apply to induata-ial wagfeewatarc
to discharge since most of the environmental
bv vastewaters in treatment and holding
Primarily oroundwatar eofifamlnafcion •• caannot be contra! l«»d
under the clean Water Act or ofehm? ' ffpA statutes. - -
'isfl
added)
-------
S?' **A *$**$ ^^ Delusion .on the need to avoid
"*$** *!° statut«8 *«r. discharges that
:tSe:pipe i1-*-' discharges directly to
dw» x* diS not intand **•* the Delusion cover
groundwater discharges from treatm<*nt processes that occur prior
SvS* I^d;;«f;thrpi?er disch«9«- ^W this exclusion
covers a subset of point sources regulated under the CWA.
-~* * * . releases to grpundwater from treatment
and holding facilities do not come within the meaning of the RCRA
^SSSLiSM0 C-5'S- ! 261-»(*)<2), but rather remain wSSiS
^ Jurisdiction of RCRA. in addition, such groundwater
discharges are subject to CWA jurisdiction, based on EPA's
interpretation that discharges from point sources throuoh
groundwater where there is a direct hydrologic conhectibn to
SSM&S?1**0* r^8 of •*?• Unitftd Stateslre subject to the
?« +£. ^^e&g&in^^np9rmit^d discharges, and thus are subject
!?*!? /S2 ^ES1Per»^ting requirements. SS& 55 Fed. Reg. 47990,
47997 (Nov. 16, 1990) (storm water permit application
regulations) ; 56 Ted. Reg. 64876, 64892 (Dec. 12, 1991) (Indian
water quality standards regulations); 58 Fed. Reg. 7610, 7631
(Feb. 8, 1993) (Region 6 general permit for f eedlots) .
y°U,havg any^queatiens on this memorandum, please call
at (2°2) 260-2737 or Mitch Kidweil of OSW at
'
(2O2) 260*4805.
-------
BBS*
'• ', !',' '" !liii,' Vi!l i ........ SEii" '1, 1 ! f' 1 JiSiillii f , ISSLI'IBIE, ' ": I1 , "ill!!!11'11 ', SIWSIIIIIBiinilllf'iiSIf LOU! SI;,, i HICIIiiilliiiFllliiiliilliWIlivll'ii'1: ' ilnPPP'% 'H ' 'I, , 1J1 Will1! Pi: P 'UP™11 :, '"' , i '!' PIP! "1< -"Pi, ...... I P'1"' -PPPiPPPPPPP 'PPPIPllillllP1 '" PPPPPPiPPPSPPP "' ' ' ' .iiPPPPPPPEP1!!!!
iii;; : g ...... , ..... jcn,,,! ^PiiiiiiipiPPiiiPi^iiup''''^!'^ PPPJ! ' ii
Pi:,:,iiP:iPiiPi|iPBPiii»iii»iiJPS;ipisiPiiiii»piis|l||-[ \ iiiiiini appppppppppppupnnpip ..... niihii'i'i'iPiiiiiiiiiiii'inaiHi1 ..... IIINW!!< *•> ,K"" ji'isiw ..... I!||>:::!:,<«I|!JIHI ...... i", 'Si,1 •"> v '"ni,::!1 \a*\ ........... sjiii?1" ..... 'insi'ir : ...... li'ii
' " .................. "j1"' ' '"
' » ^ ...... ny 'iii
......... ; .............. ; ..... ;, ...... , ................ , ...... ;;;; ............ „:;, ........ :;;„ ........................ „, ................... 1;;
, <" JilsIBi •llifl!' .i, 'IB'1'1 . , IJU ' "ft;!1" El: il!" t'l'iiillllr
ii:!''1 tia ,i«i*ifiK.';if ..MWI^SMI " •
;:' ;,,,,; ,;,;;";;,;,, „,";;;„;, , ' „
11 ' •= ''' '=' ''=""' ' ' "-•• -1 "i|""11"1'
l llil!1;, ',:,.;, 1 .lili'l11'1,,,,,!! i i 'I'S,,;'!) ' In, in '1C*
"' "' '"»"' »"'"""'"'"
,; ,,,; , ,, :, ; ,;„
"" : ' ';","!"
,, ,„. , , ,„„ . n,,;,,,, , „,, .,' ,. , |.«. i'liir •' • ivnii!
' ' '"' " ' 'S ••!' " » '" l!' ' »» " ' ! » ' ' J " ' »»» " " "" " ' ' !. - !
"'"'n. ' v V • .u' • '.• .' t* • • • i - .-.*Hgj* -
This Page
Blank
. 1 IK
ill illillllli i IIIIIIIIIIIIIII
ii i ni i i uu
„
iiiii 11
-------
• - . '»- • •' . ' . • ,. • •-'.•••.• . '. . . . ••.,.;! . V; '{.j y... • ;. •.. . *
-. - ....... .. - ... .,...,. .-.".•_ .- • /; •_- • " .-- ^asl-ih .. vrrr:.-;..
'.. .... ^tosr-«^ .; /.'... . :.-. ;.. . ..-. ."...-• .'.: :-..- .-.- '• ..-. . .-••,-. i £EL^.^y, •-•-.-
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
-CT 9 I too*
, i_»* ^- " *%»*wwT .
9441.1995(06)
^f^ff^f « • •. *<•»%«««* *•'" '• • •" • " * ".•'.,- OFFICE OF
MEMORftHDUM ;• • . • • . • '- . • SOLO WASTE AND EMERGENCY
'..•.'.' , ' : '• '• . " * ' " ' "•'•'." -' ' RESPONSE
SUBJECT: . Iiifec^iQus ap4/pr>SenetIcally Engineered Waste •
FROM:. . ' MiaiaeajSha^irdrr DTrectror-.
• • ..F;d£fiqe >bf Solid Waste . . -' : •• . •
••'•• U • -^'.:' • ' . ' -. '••- '• • '...: - • -
TO: '• - Robert L. Duprey, Director , . - .
. '. _ * . Hazardous Waste Management Division ..- ... . '
. - "Thank you for your memorandum in which you raised issues
concerning RCRA and TSCA jurisdiction over infectious and/or
genetically engineered waste. You have' asked us to clarify EPA's
authority to require submittal of information under. RCRA section
3007 and to require corrective action for wastes which may have
been disposed at the Dugway Proving Ground . (DPG), a Department of
lthe Army facility ihC«noUlnk
MMt 50% raeyeM flfacf
-------
section 7003 if-the statutory elements are established. Regions
have'^the authority to make case-by-case decisipns on whether, such
material meets the statutory .definition'of hazardous waste.1 " .
• -Your letter also'questioned.whether section 3004(u):applies
. in tJbL.is case. Section 3004 (u) requires corrective .action; for '
relfase.s of hazardous-waste.or constituents from any solid waste-
: management unit at the facility..- Since biological', genetically
.engineered or in^fectipus wastes are solid wastes, SWMUs£-$*** ^ * • •.
' containing these 'wastes/would be subject to"section 3004(u). 'In
. the proposed Subpart S rule, EPA interpreted ."hazardous waste"
• .for'purposes of-'section-3004 (u) to encompass-the statutory
" .definition.of hazardous. waste.. Based on. th'is 'interpretation, , •
the Region-"could use section .3004 (u) .authority to require ' ,- ".
j , investigation of any SWMUs .to-determine'whether there are '
releases of hazardous waste (as-defined"under section 1004(5)) 'or
,* " constituents [ Because^ this interpre'tatiori of section 3004 (u) is "
contained in a proposed rule tEat has not been- finalized, the
. ' Re'giori should be prepared to explain the interpretation'-as well
• al|£r<5vidixig site-specific reasons why it is appropriate,to
require an investigation of this issue at'the facility.
Note that section 3009 (h); enforcement authority may be used
in the same .manner,since EPA's position is that the scope of'
«'" that authority, is no .less broad than §3004' (u).. '.See memorandum - -
frotji J""I Winston Porter', "Interpretation, of Section 3008 (h) of" the-
| Solid .Waste 'Disposal Act" (Dec. 16, 1985). If any aspect of the
"ficITTty" Is classified, that is no.t a-bar to EPA '/action unless
the facility has a presidential exemption, under section :6001,
, although inspectors may be required to .obtain appropriate
security clearances. ' . . . ' . •'
Your memorandum also raised gjiest'ions regarding EPA's
autfiorrtles to ad~3resi tExi: facility under' the Toxic Substances
' Control Act (TSCA)'. Although.TSCA may have mechanisms to address
this type of material in'a remedial context, we believe the RCRA
authorities outlined above would be more appropriate to address
the facility in/question in light of the fact that this is a RCRA
"Finally, you asked whether EPA's authority to address these
wastes under RCRA is tied to any particular date. -We do -not • .
tha es are rel,Sy,Sa!= .......... J=2 ........... ^fZSSPM^-^^^y' of RCRA'.
authorities™ and -3007
'
' ....... Save ............. no'"" ...... such- limitations ..... I
1 In addition, CERCLA section 104 (ej , which covers "hazardous
substances", also could be used here. . .
-------
We hope .that you find this•Information helpful. Please
contact David Pagan at (703) 308-8620 if you have any. questions
cc: M. Hale '.
.'. '• D. Barnes .
. . • B. Pace
-------
I t „ mtaf •* Mr":
.STATES ENVIRONMENTAL ;pRpfECTlON AGENCY
: '• REGION vui: •-'—•:.'; ,: ' O" .-•
. , / .999 18th STREET- SUITE 500 -" ( \ '
'"'"* ' DENVER,
„•,',- .'•.' •"••;• "•'. • '""; - •
•» . • •/.'>•,„•«'
" Ref:
J
Infectiousiatad/dr• Geneti'ca^Lly Engineered'-Waste [.''':• '.
,* i ' . •• ..-."•
FROM: : : Robert. L. Duprey,/.Director „,_
• «•. t . ' t T.' .Hazardous Waste, Management >D2y6&±8
j ^ * !;i4,i'"- * "t~ "•" V • ' • " " '.•..•/- •'•?~^ -,:•.-'
"'" TO.:" ' • Miqhael H.":Shapirp, -.Director-••.-.'. ....
* ; • ;/"• Of f ice, of Solid.-Waste •'.-; : ; • • •. .;- : \; ;•".;...-.'.,'' ."• . v;'.--. ••.-. • ;.-",-.
,f " We'are requesting clarification"of the extent .of EPA's,-- . ' VK ".
•ati'thorities "pertaining to the Dugway..Proving Ground. = (DPG.).,.-..-.'.
Department, of Array facility,' in Tooele County,.- Utah. - .DPG Is ..a ; ' ' : '
Resource• Conservation and Recovery Act. (RCRA)•...treatment, storage>••; :;
and 4£sposal/facility going through .closure • and .perhaps, will •>$••>•• ;'._.• -j
re'ceive "a post ',cl~6sure piermit. \-DPG has .a RCRA Storage^ permit 'and .';•:..;•.
is subject to corrective "action. - :. ":•"-.•'-;" i^' '• . ..•"':;"t;^/ :_ " ':.'-.-
, , „ PEG had, a mission.to develop biological and, chemical agents ;•
for*use by. the DOD. '.Waste material-.was produced by DPG in v •' v .'[ •:..-':
accomplishing this mission,", Because'of .the cl'assified. nature.'of .- •
"the work at, DPG*'we .do not know the full extent and types of.. •; . ; .
^gjigg- -^ groduced over the years. "(About'30 years :ago, DPG had. , ;
several s£eep kills from some type -of experimentation itf was .-.: • •',
Conducting.) Chemical agerits'have been "tested at DPG in ' . .' ".•
€sxperimental animals. "We and this State of-Utah'have authority to' • -,
address solid and hazardous wastes .issues and.-releases from solid
..waste management units at the facili£y,- and we are doing so..'. .
Pathogens, non-pathogens> and otherbiological agents-were-
probably experimented with at DPG. ' Waste from these experiments
"were^disposed on-site'and perhaps off-post. Undfer RCRA §1004 (5)
Ihe Agency has statutory authority vto ^address infectious. : '. •''•'/• •
pharateristics -waste, but -no regulations have .been 'developed by ; ',.'"'
"EPA. Infectious waste is considered by Region. 8 ..to be a solid .' . . r
waste. , .The Medical Waste Tracking Act, Subtitle J, of .RCRA, has. .. •
expired,-and so""it-. £s nQ-^OI1ge3: germane, to ptir concerns* :•;-. "; ', -•-..;
'Us:
IIMIIIH
O
Printed on Rfcydfd Ptpw..
-------
• DPG under §--3007 of-RCRAr^eJjardlngY:!^
biological/infectious:waste-material handled arid'rdisposed. by DPG.. .-;;
We also need confirmation: that we. do .have .theauthority under,.- ^- ; .
_ ^- .-.: . ...-.•,• . :-^ •,..•*• .11^ :_-.:"j_ iiso«--'»i--'-4-«^a-«fl/^'»-oaei5>inTnan~nea;Ltll.v-I.'-:..
Further,. the Toxics' Substances. Control.. Act;:^TSCA)"^has given . .
•" to -EPA-.the authority to regulate^enetically.engineered :.-:.-:^ -^ ~ •••^.••^
-• organisms " even--though;-our'-appait^ibnx^-;vjta^>authprd^
DPG may have experimented. wit^i>genetically,.engineered . : ;-.' ;.$%
• •_LJ___J_T_' • TI~~~. merrK. -nvfvtn <4o TTD'b • -w'i ttl -ailthontV tO . »:•' • ...-•!•••• •';s"4
- . ,,.
SSlbgical materials, 'Does. TSCA.provide,EEA;vith,authority;tp.
- j- -_.•_-•_-.*..: —.;'-~f '»-w/i_/q-i oT^rtaai:^o^-:-er&o6t±caiiVftengineereo.-.".
-------
ftllfp"
111 Illlllll
111 I Illlllll 111
111 II
111 111
1IIII
,1
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
11lllllll II Ill I j
IIIIIIP llllll'lll I
Illlllll 111 111
I I
1 11 111
II II I '( II
111 ll Illlllll III 111
Illlllll I 111 I II t II 111
111 Illlllll i HIM , IllllilI
•I Illlllll I I II"dl Id i 1,
111 Illlllll
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
••••" i/
'
OFF1CEOF
Mr.. John McNally . - -
Coll, Davidson, Carter, : . '
Smith, Salter and Barkett . ",
3200 Miami Center • ;
201 South Biscayne Boulevard
Miami, FL 33131-2312 .
Dear Mr. McNally: ' • .
Thank you for your letter; of February 13, 1995 requesting a .
determination of , whether RCRA hazardous waste regulatory *
requirements apply to the handling, shipment and disposal of
household appliance components removed from residences during
routine maintenance and repair services. ' '
Under Federal law, wastes- from households are exempt from
regulation (40 CFR 261. 4 (b) (1)). Household waste, to be excluded
pursuant to 40 CFR Section 261. 4 (b) (1) must fulfill two criteria:
first, household waste has to be generated by individuals on the
premises of a household and, second, "the waste stream must be
composed primarily of materials found in the waste generated by
consumers in their homes." EPA does not distinguish between
waste generated at a household by a homeowner and waste generated
at a household by a person other than the homeowner .{e.g.,
contractor) provided that the waste is generated as part of daily
living (e.g., routine residential maintenance). Under EPA's
current reading, solid waste generated by a homeowner, resident, .
or a contractor at a home as part of routine residential
maintenance (as opposed to building construction, renovation, and
demolition) would be part of the household waste stream, and thus
would be exempt under the RCRA household waste exemption.
From the description provided in your letter, it appears
that the thermostat components of residential ovens being handled
under your program meet the requirements for exemption as a •
household waste. Individual states, however, may choos,e to have
their own laws and policies on "household waste". Section 3009
of RCRA allows states to impose standards more stringent than, or
in addition to, those in the -Federal program. Therefore-, you
should contact the states in which the program will be operating
for further assistance in determining the appropriate waste -------------- ..... -
management and disposal requirements in each of these states.
ftecycted/Rocyclabl*
PrtntM wtm Soy/Onol* ** on piper vat
eontaln««tl««ttSO%racyci«d
-------
Ji«ni»4
ti %
You may "also be interested to know'that EPA has developed a
new strlaiiihed-regulatory system for used batteries and other
waste streams generated by non-households, which we call;
"universal wastes." One of the goals of this rule is to separate
these universal•wastes -fromthe municipal waste stream. I nave
™*±ei!&losed a copy of the proposal. The^Agency expects the final •
rule to be promulgated later this spring. - ,
j you foryour interest in proper waste management
Sincerely,
practices
Michael Petruska, .Chief
Regulatory Development
Branch
* if
I ! 1 J In
-------
COLL DAVIDSON CARTER SMITH SALTER & BARKETT
PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
JAMIE L. ANDERSON
JOHN M. SARKETT
FRANCIS L. CARTER
NORMAN A. COLL
MICHAEL J. COMPAGNO
TED C. CRAIC
BARRY R. DAVIDSON
YALE J. riSHMAN
MICHAEL J. MIGER
JOHN J. MCNALLY
JIMMY L. MORALES
GARY M. MURPHREE
DARRELL W. PAYNE
VANCE E. SALTER
HARRIS C. SISKINO
RICHARD C. SMITH
SHERRY A. STANLEY
COURTNEY B. WILSON
32OO MIAMI CENTER
2OI SOUTH BISCAYNE BOULEVARD
MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131-2312
(3OS) 373-SZOO
TELECOPICR (3O5) 374-7296
PHYLLIS SHAMPANIER
or COUNSEL
February 13, 1995
VIA FACSIMILE (202-260-0225)
Michael Petruska :
Branch Chief
Regulatory Development Branch
Characterization and Assessment Division
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20460 . .-. •
Re: Regulatory Evaluation
• _:»' -. \
Dear Mr. Petruska:
The following information is provided to you for purposes of obtaining an
interpretation from EPA to determine if the Resource Conservation & Recovery Act (RCRA)
hazardous waste regulatory requirements apply to the handling, shipment and disposal of
household appliance components removed from residences during routine maintenance and
repair services. I have been in contact with representatives of several EPA region offices to
address this subject as the activity involves removal of appliance components from
households in numerous states throughout the country. This request is submitted to you for
purposes of confirming my telephone conversations with Marilyn Goode in your office to
achieve uniformity and consistency hi the application of the EPA regulatory requirements and
to ensure compliance in the handling of these items.
The activities involve removal of a thermostat component from ovens located in
residences throughout the country. The thermostat component consists of a copper tubing
and contains approximately one ounce of sodium potassium alloy liquid sealed within the
tubing. The thermostat is removed by the manufacturer's service representatives and placed
in a package in a container in the service vehicle. The component is picked up with other
appliance parts by a transportation company and taken to a warehouse facility for further
shipping and ultimate disposal. A third company picks up the components and transports
m
-------
1WBI iBiiifc siii'irrw
j i ijyji||nnjnii|njij ly i^yi igi mil in in inj i i nil i in in n i mi i mini i in HIM nil j ^ L|[ i ™ | nil ' |in
inn hill n i n n HI iilinlllnnwiwi iiinlni i inniiininn i in iiiiiiliiinnii nil n ilnnnnil n |linn nniiii lull iiniiii n n illiniliiniNin n mi in nil in iniiiiiiiiinilinin iiininin inliilnin
' . 'A
1 1 .*. , , 4 * I I In "
Michael Petruska .
"Branch Chief
February 13, 1995
Page 2
III 11111
• • j . . • -.'-.,•. •' ' 'I ' ' ••>*>.^.'-*..,"-- : - • ' : ' #&
them to a facility where the component is opened and the liquid is removed from the -
thermostat. Based ""oni""thenatureofthesodiump^fasshun alloy liquid, the material exhibits
a reactive characteristic upon removal from the component. Following this reaction, the •
liquid i 3ispose3 of at the facility into a Publicly-Owned Treatment Works (POTW).
1II I1II1111I Illllil H '. 11 nil n nl I I mill ' li i i 11 11 i MI III ii i ill I i I III W hi i H , IN
mi in iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii n iiiiiini iiiiiini n i n n n 11 inn 11 1111 inn 11 nun inn inn in nil inn n inn i inn in in in n in inn n in inn i i j n i s i v^tf1
During removal of the thermostat and during the entire course of handling and .,?.
shipping, the component remains intact and is handled hi accordance with applicable J!
Department of Transportation (DOT) transportation and labeling requirements similar to the fS
shipment of new thermostat components. Based on me number of states involved and to |
ensure compliance with appUcable regulatory requirements, the entities involved are -|
* interested hi clarifying and confirming the regulatory requirements related to the handling of • „ ?
this component (and in particular determining if the component is subject to regulation under •
RCRA Subtitle C). Based on my telephone conversations with Ms. Goode and her *
rt discussions with other EPA representatives, I have been informed that tLis component would
be Considered within the RCRA household waste exemption and not .subject to the RCRA .
hazardous waste regulations. As I am sure you can appreciate, clarification and confirmation
of the applicable regulatory requirements concerning this component is of concern to the •
corSpanies to ensure the proper arid responsible handling of these components in a manner
cpnsistenF with EPA regulations. '
" • Considering the scope of this activity, the companies are interested in obtaining a
xes^oW from EPAafthe earliest date possible.' Your cooperation and attention in this
matter is very much appreciated Please contact me following your review of this
mformation so we can discuss these activities and the evaluation of the regulatory
requirements.
Sincerely,
JJM:mag
IKI,'' Illllll 11 1 Illl'i 'lllllli 111
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
: ' WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460 . ".'"'
9441.1995(08)
MAR T1995
GENERALCOUNSEL
MEMORANDUM
•-•-•-•
SUBJECT: • Applicability of the Household Waste Exclusion
to Lead-Contaminated Soil .
PROH: Lisa K.
Associate General Counsel . .
Solid Waste and Emergency Response Division (2366)
TO: Pamela A. Hill
Deputy Regional Counsel
• Region I "... ' •"' ".,,"' •'•'_' : ' ./
Background ; - . ' •
Your staff has asked us whether the household waste
exclusion in 40 CFR S 261.4(b)(l) applies to lead-contaminated
soil in residential yards that . exhibits the hazardous
characteristic 'of toxicity. (SSS. Kargery Adams, Senior Assistant
Regional Counsel, Memorandum to Larry Starfield, Assistant
General Counsel for RCRA (April 7, 1993)). In the Region's
memorandum, your staff indicated that lead-contaminated soils in
residential yards in New England are a significant exposure
pathway for children, id. at 2i ORC also suggests that efforts
to clean-up such lead-contaminated soils may not be occurring •
because of uncertainties relating to the applicability of RCRA
Subtitle C hazardous waste regulations to the soils. £d. During
a telephone conference call, we agreed to provide you with some
guidance as to whether the residential lead-contaminated soils
that exhibit the toxicity characteristic fall within the
household waste exclusion. . -
Issue ' . - .
Do lead-contaminated soils in residential yards that exhibit
the toxicity characteristic fall within the household waste
exclusion in 40 CFR 261.4(b)(l) such that the soil would not be
subject to RCRA Subtitle C regulatory requirements?
-------
'' , ' .Y^i"""1,' '! J'f. " ,' *,f >l"'d. '
Conclusion
If the source, of the lead 'contamination was a result of
either routine residential maintenance or the weathering 'or
chalking of lead^based' paint fronT the residence,. then the lead-
.contaminated soil in residential yards would be part of the
household waste stream as defined in the household waste
exclusion of 40 CFR S 261.4(b) (I)/ even if the soil exhibits the
characteristic of toxicity under 40 CFR S 261.24. Under these
circumstances, the soil would not be subject to the hazardous
waste regulations under RCRA Subtitle C and' may be managed on- '
site" or disposed of off-site in accordance with applicable RCRA
Subtitle D regulations and/or state law. '...'.'•
l 111 111 111 I
1111 nil 111II i 1111II
Xttfl'i iii""!"!1 in1 "i mi 11 "i I'm"
If the site-specific facts indicate, however, that lead
fcontamination in the .residential soil was also |due to significant
i lead sources other -than the household,,1 the exclusion for
.'1 household waste may not be available, and' '"''the homeowner should
'consult with the appropriate state or federal authorities to
determine how to manage the soil under RCRA and state law.
Discussion . ... .
EPA promulgated the household waste exclusion as part of the.
Agency's initialphaseofimplementing RCRA section 3001, which
required the Agency to establish criteria for identifying
hazardous waste characteristics and listing specific hazardous
wastes. 42 U.S.C. S 6921; 45Fed. Reg. 33084, 33098-99, 33120
(Hay 19, 1980). In that 1980 regulation, EPA excluded ."household
waste" from being identified as hazardous waste to implement
Congressional intent as expressed in the legislative history of •
RCRA as enacted in 1976. See S. Rep. No. 94-988, 94th Cong., 2d
Sess., at 16 '("hazardous waste .program not be used either to
control the disposal of substances used in households or to
extend control over .general .municipal wastes based on the
* presence of sucff suBlst'ancesV*). • ,._ - '. • , ^ ' •.
In promulgating the exclusion in 1980, EPA defined
." B "householdt waste" to include "any waste material (including
,'"" VgSb"age7 txash"^ an! s"a-ln-ljtary wastes" :in septic tanks) derived from
:hqusehqlds(including single family residences, hotels and
mqtels).." 45 Fed. Reg.. 33084, 33120 (May 19, 1980). In 1984 the
/Agency expanded the scope of the household waste definition to
•include wastes from bunkhouses, ranger stations, crew quarters,
""I;1 &Jfi$j&!5BSS3&"t " picnic grounds, and day-use recreation-areas. 49
Fed. Reg. 44978 (Nov. 13, 1984); 40 CFR S 261.4(b)(l).
Although the definition of household waste does not indicate
whether a waste is household waste as a result -of the place of
generation, e.g.. a residence, or as a result of who generated
1 it,. e.g..'f a resident of a household, EPA limited the exclusion's
aSplication to those wastes which meet two criteria; (1) the
-------
waste must be generated by individuals on the premises' of a
household and (2) the waste must be composed primarily of
materials found in the wastes .generated by consumers in their
homes. 49 Fed. Reg. 44978 (Nov. 13, 1984).1 If a waste
satisfies both criteria,. then it would fall within the household
waste exclusion and not be subject to RCRA Subtitle C regulation.
id. If a household waste is mixed with a regulated hazardous ,
waste, however, then the household waste exclusion no longer
applies. 45 Fed. Reg. 33084, 33099 (May 19, 1980)..
In applying these'criteria to circumstances analogous to
those discussed in your April 7, 1993 memorandum, this office has
previously taken the position that lead-contaminated paint chips
resulting from stripping and re-painting of residential walls by
a homeowner or a contractor2 (as part of routine household
maintenance) would be part of the household waste stream and not*
subject to RCRA Subtitle C regulation.3 Moreover, once it is
determined that waste, such as the lead-contaminated paint chips,
is a household waste under 40 CFR S 261.4(b)(1), the exclusion.
from RCRA Subtitle C coverage "would continue to apply
indefinitely (as long as the household waste was not subsequently
mixed with regulated hazardous waste).. £ee. 54 Fed. Reg. 12326,'
12339 (March 24, 1989) (waste generated by health care providers
in private homes not subject to medical waste tracking or
management standards even when waste is removed from the home and
transported to the physician's place of business). .
1 EPA has taken the position that the household waste
exclusion should not be extended to debris resulting from
building construction, renovations, or demolition in houses, or
other residences, because EPA did not consider the debris from
such operations to be of a type similar to that generated by a
consumer in a home. 49 Fed. Reg. 44978 (Nov. 13, 1984).
2 in the final rule establishing standards for the
tracking and management of medical waste, EPA concluded that
waste generated by health care providers, i.e., contractors, in
private homes where they provide medical services to individuals
would be covered by the household waste exclusion. 54 Fed. Reg.
12326, 12339 (March 24, 1989). Although the rationale for this
position" was not fully discussed, it is clear that such waste met
the two criteria .outlined above, i.e., the waste is generated by
individuals in households and it is similar to the materials
found in wastes generated by consumers in their homes..
5 • This office's oral advice pertaining to the
applicability of the household waste exclusion to paint chips
resulting from the stripping and painting of residential walls is
correctly reflected in an EPA Hotline Report. EPA, Monthly
Hotline Report - March 1990, RCRA Question 6.. (Attached.)
-------
1 .'This position is consistent with ,a determination EPA.reached
in a proposed rule that would exempt from"certain hazardous waste
regulations media and debris contaminated, with petroleum from
''home heating oil tanks. 58 Fed. Reg. 8504 (Feb. 12, 1993). In
' the preamble to the proposed rule, EPA -stated that:
^ I ^^contaminated .media and debris generated from residential'
heating oiltanksare "household wastes" under 40 CFR .
261.4*(t>) (1). Under EPA's subtitle C regulations, household
wastes are solid waste but are excluded from consideration
as 'hazardous wastes. " Thus, contaminated, media 'and, debris ' •'
heating oil..'tank's. "areTlibt' ''.hazardolos : wastes
== i»=™» ='B • ;' • • 'under' subtitle C of RCRA.
" ; ; •" :• ••.,.' • .' , - ,.' •;. ••. --. •'.' ' • /»'
at 8505 (emphasis added) . .. • .
IP I • • . ii i i i i ' ; ; '.i,' .;: ::» • ,11,:;, r
I I ."' Given thjw .existing. ,EPA positions on the reach.of the. ..-•
household vai'€i excjusioh", we believe.that if the'lead
contamination, .in residential soil is. the result of, routine
shipping and painting, pro ject(s) or the natural-weather ing of
lead-contaminated paint, then the household waste exclusion would
aE>ply, and the soil (or other environmental media which has
becqmte contaminated} would not be subject to RCRA Subtitle C
regulation, even If" it exhibits a hazardous waste characteristic.
Such soils may be stabilized .with lime, rototilled, or otherwise
managed on-site or disposed of off-site without the need for a
RCRA Subtitle C permit. Of course, RCRA.Subtitle D regulations,
may apply if, for example, the soil is moved off-site. State
and local, standards may also be applicable to 'the-management of
the "soil.• • ' - "•
If,'however, lead contamination in the residential soils is
' also due to significant lead sources other than the household,
, . e'.fr... a lead smelter or mining waste, then further analysis would
' [ 'n ™ ' £4' 'needed to determine, if the, household waste, exclusion from RCRA
":: =^1™'""l"s!tjd3title C regulation .would still be £va^jable. in' Sycn' cases,
.' it would be advisable for the homeowner to contact the
«•; i.' ==' =- "= i ^appropriate state or federal g^g^j^-ies regarBIng proper
;;• :;. =;x: • ;, ::;^jiiigagement of the lead-contaminated soil under RCRA and state
'"See 49 Fed". Reg* 44978 (Nov. 13,. 1984) (to be covered by
'"houseliPld exclusion, the waste stream "must be composed
''' wastes generated by consumers 'in their homes".).
IK;.]« pi 1 Hill II I Ill 11 1 1 11 1 11 1 In • ' ' i ,
,, |!|!&8ii5s i R.CJA Subtitle D regulations, however, may not be
'.'. \ '„' " " ' '.applicable if 'the soil' is managed'.or disposed of at the
" " ~"":" ^Ij^|jg4
-------
If the residential soils are found not to be exempt from the
definition of hazardous waste pursuant to the household waste
exclusion, and they .exhibit the toxicity characteristic, then
RCRA Subtitle C regulations would apply to the generation,
transportation, .treatment, storage, or disposal of a hazardous
waste (absent another exemption). However, there are options for
reducing risks from non-exempt soil which would not trigger RCRA
regulatory obligations. For example, covering soils .with sod,
mulch, or gravel would not constitute the generation,^
transportation, treatment, storage, or disposal of a hazardous
wist? andthus such limited onsite-risk reduction measures would-
not trigger RCRA Subtitle C obligations. •
If you have any additional questions concerning the
household waste exclusion, please contact Andy Gordon at
(202) 260-3596. - .
Attachment
cc: Mike Shapiro, OSW
David Bussard, OSW . .• •
Regional Counsel RCRA Branch Chiefs, Regions I - X
RCRA Branch Chiefs, Regions I - X
David Nielsen, OECA . ;
Joe Carra, OPPT - ' . '.
-------
Jill I I U
I
'! I
11 ill in i in
(ill
I ' !
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
(IS
flHRS ,'| b!,!i ,t In 'Mjn { i'i'"':<"! { '" ,"" .'jji!1,,1:! ,,1 •«' ;|."'« ^'"l; 'j""'; l'ljjll"l !:|™11'111'111''!11?1''^ iSiJi11"1 •l
v1 sit ^rSJS*'«". /lii:1"""!"I"' 'i"iij''I1"1:! ?•; i. •'"• .!•*#rtf$E1 1;;^i'IS! I
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460
9441.1995(09)
OFFICEOF
MAR -8 1995
Mr. Jack H. Goldman
Morgan, Lewis, and Bockius
1800 M Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036-5869 .
Dear Mr. Goldman: .
Thank you for your letter of December 6, 1994, concerning the applicability
of Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) regulations to hazardous
wastes generated in product storage tanks and manufacturing process units. As
you mentioned in your letter, 40 CFR 261.4(c) indicates that hazardous waste
generated in these units is not subject to RCRA regulation until it exits the unit, or -
unless the waste remains in the unit more than 90 days after the unit ceases to be
operated for manufacturing or product storage. As is explained in the discussion
you cited in an August, 1987, RCRA/Superfund Hotline Monthly Report, this
provision means that the applicable 90/180/270-day generator accumulation period
prescribed by 40 CFR 262.34 does not begin until 90 days after a product storage
tank or manufacturing process unit ceases to be operated for manufacturing or
product storage.
This letter addresses only the federal hazardous waste regulations. Most
state .agencies are authorized to implement the base RCRA program, which
includes the generator regulations and the 40 CFR 261.4{c) exemption. State
regulations, which are in effect in authorized states in lieu of the federal program,
may be different (although no less stringent) than the federal regulations. Thus,
you should contact the appropriate state environmental agency to determine how
the regulations of that particular state apply to your client's activities.
I hope this information is useful to you.
Sincerely,
Michael J. Petruska, Chief .
Regulatory Development Branch
4**v
fUcyctod/RecycJable
MnttdwtthSoy/C»nol«lniconp»perth«t
contain* «tl«««tSO%r«cyS««flBef
-------
------------- ---_-.
aatf' 'LEWIS i!'sOCX:w • • " (WEI)] fa G7* 94 T "'S7.''l 7: OS/NO. 35505:52*5 ? i
' '" ..... '
BOCKIUS .
[[[ ..... , ........................... ....... .......... ............ ............ ........
new Yo*« , ' • • ISOO.M STRCCT. N.W. . Lea A«aet
* ' WASHIMOTOM. O.C. 80030 '' . ' ' ' . " . ' '
**ro
JACK H. GOLDMAN
• isasi
t i ' *. December 6, 1994 . • • - .
. " ; •- . ' tJ(
Mr. Michael J. Petrueka . " . ^
Chief, Regulatory Development Branch. ' ':
Office of Solid'Waste , . ;
U.S. Invironmental Protection Agency • ?
"Mail Code 5304 „ . , '•< - , • . ..
40% M street, S.W. ' • .• . .. ' '•••• . «
;.Washington, D.c. 20460-' .- ' •••• • • ' • -"*
,J,Dear Mr. Petruska: _ '_ ^. _ • . i . * ' ^
* ' Pu'rsuant £"p our "telephone conversation of- • •
November 17, 1994, the purpose of this letter is to confirm that
thJe Agency's1 policy with regard to: 40 C.P.R. S 261.4 (c), as
stated in a November 4, 1987 memo from Thea McManus (copy
attached) ,K is still in effect. I represent a company that has
a facilitywith several product storage and manufacturing process
tanks that .'contain both product and accreted hazardous waste.
The company'1 has begun to terminate its operations at this
facility. My client is trying to ascertain the applicable
deadlines for removing the hazardous 'waste from the tanks, and
stiipping" t'Se wiite Slf-Bitte for treatment or disposal.
waste''inproe or raw matea
'tanks, in "manufacturing process units," and in "non-waste-
trWtraent-manufacturing units" (collectively *MPUs«) is currently
exempt from applicable hazardous waste regulations at 40 C.P.R.
Parts 262-265, 268, 270, 271, and 124 until the waste is removed
from the MP0 or remains in the unit for more than. ninety .days
after the cessation of operations.1' In the case of a facility
ceasing the operations of an MPU, Agency policy, as stated in the
November 1987 memorandum, is that after the passage of ninety
days, the waste is subject to the hazardous waste management
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, memorandum from Thea.
McManus, "Final Monthly Report -- RCRA/Superfund Industry
Assistance RepbrE for August 1987," at 6-8 .(November 4,
-------
FSCK MOBGAN. LEWIS & BOCK! US : V ^ . - / MD) \Z 07'94 17: • ;•; .. .:7:08/NO. 3560556265 P 3/J4;
'' ' • "-' . ",'."• ' " ' ,"'"''' . • - ,yK~ =«. " • "_.-*."
, Lewis It Bocwws
*.* _ %* 4 ^t» «»«*^ • Y
Tu . WlCIiaej. u*
December 6, 1994 '. . ' .
'Page 2 - '• •-. .' • , • - . " .' ' ;- :"' •." " -. ' '"'' '. • . . '..'
^regulations and may then be stored on-site without a permit or
interim status for an additional ninety days pursuant to the
accumulation rule at 40 C.F.R. S 262. 34 (a) .^ In other words, -
two consecutive ninety-day periods potentially^ apply to _ , - _ •
management of the waste: ninety days (or until removal- of tne -- -
waste or the date of extinction, whichever comes earliest) until
the waste is subject to regulation, and ninety days for the waste
to be stored on-site without obtaining a storage permit or
interim status. . , - ..'.••',".
1 • ' ' ""'"'••*,*."'
As a f ollowup' to the above interpretation, it is my
understanding that hazardous waste that is stored in an MPU for
ninety days pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 261. 4 (c) can continue to
remain in that unit for up to an additional ninety days under the
ninety-day accumulation rule at 40 C.F.R. 5 262. 34 (a) , provided
that the KPU meets the definition of tank at 40 C.F.R. S 260.10,
and all applicable provisions of 40 C.F.R. S 262. 34 (a) are met,
including that the tank complies with all applicable requirements
for tanks at 40 C.F.R. Part 265 Subpart J.
I would greatly appreciate it if you would confirm that
these interpretations regarding the MPO rule of 40 C.F.R.
;§ 261. 4 (c) remain the Agency policy. Because my client has
initiated procedures to shut down its facility, I would
appreciate an answer as soon as possible. Thank you very much
for your assistance. Please call me if you have any questions.
Sincerely yours,
K. Goldman
Enclosure •
Hotline Memorandum, §&£&. note 1; personal communication
Michael Petruska, Office of Solid Waste (November 1394)
(enclosed) . .
-------
F
Ill
V
i
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
i Hi i 11
Ill 111 l(|l|lllll I II (III llll III 11111 II
•II I I II III 111 III (III Illllll
•iiiiiir i i iii(iii
in iiiiiii i i iiii in i 11 iiiiiii
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
MAR 8 1995
"" V 9441.1995 (10)
OFFICEOF
SOUO WASTE AND EMERGENCY
C^V,.,;. RESPONSE
Mr. Christian M. Richter "'' o wttti Soy/OMOte ktt ott ptpcr ttict
aft *t*aAStr*rmc.yt*6 Vtitr
-------
.
i£ ........ 3) ..... Sates ....... jjpA^s ...... beOeTwitS
to
sand'
; waste management, and 4) describes the next steps to be taken to assure proper compliance in the
* • foundry industry with RCRA regulations and to reach a common understanding between EPA and
* AFS members. ' ' '" '• ' •' • •••.-.'•• -'•••"
I - - l. \ -." -""' '.
, f 1,1 ' ' < • ' • . . ' • •
1. Description of Foundry Processes/ Overview of Spent Foundry Sands Management
A. Description of Foundry Processes
i , t - *, *"£ WVJ'g^ , ^ i* .* n if
In | 11 I » y III I ni • ." . , *," „ . , ,
Based on prior correspondence from representatives of AFS member companies and materials
sub™ttcd to EPA by AFS during our November 16th meeting, our understanding of the typical
foundry process is as follows. Foundries are facilities where ferrous and non-ferrous metal castings
are produced. The metal castings are produced from sand molds and cores which have been formed
m a separate moldmaking process. The sand molds and cores are formed by molding sand together
with clay or resin binders. Organic solvents may be added to the resins to reduce their viscosity.
After the metal castings are poured into the molds and cooled, the molds are broken to remove the
castings at a table referred to as a "shakeout table". - ' "
n iiiii mi n ill 11 M • n i i in i mi • i iiiiiiiiiiiii IIIHII^ i nil i ii in inn iiiiiiiiiiiniiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiniiiiiiii mini innniinininn in inn i in in in n in mini n in K n , i - i * "
In the process of breaking die molds, several things occur simultaneously. First, the casting
jf<- separated from lie broken mold and core and sent off for cleaning. Second, sand fines become.
";;;,;;;;;; ~ airborne and are typically collected under negative pressure in a vacuum aspiration tube located
'" proximately to the" shakeout table. These fines may be wetted and deposited into a tank where iron is
~ added in an attempt to fix lead in the fines prior to disposing of them in municipal landfills or on-site
industrial landfills. Third, the broken molds are placed into a reclamation process consisting of a
vibratory drum with perforations and a series of conveyors and screens.
111 LI'l Ill 111 111 (III
• Sand (hereafter referred to as return^sand) which passes through the drum and screens .is
returned to me moldmaking process to be used to make new molds. The entire process of making
sand molds and reclaiming return sand for producing new molds is referred to as the sand loop.
Some chunks of sand from the broken molds and cores cannot be broken down and are too
large to fit through me drum/screening process. This sail together with bits and chunks of metal
(referred to is tramp metal), is removed from the screening process and sent to a ball mill where the
mixture is milled and remaining metal is removed for reinsertion into the casting process or sold for
recycling. Iron may be added to the clumps of sand prior to or during the milling process in an
attempt to fix lead in the sand. The milled sand is then sent to a municipal or on-she industrial
landfill. " ' " ''''•'.' ' • •• ..."•'
B. - Overview cf Spent Foundry Sand Management . .- •
' " As yew inenn'cra rn yciir incoming letter to EPA, AFS estimates that 100 million tons of sand
used to TnaVe molds in the ferrous and non-ferrous foundry industry and diat approximately 94
'percent of these sands are reused within the industry. In an April 26, 1993 article of American
ftfetals_Market. AFS is quoted as estimating mat only about 4 percent, or 240,000 tons of the
estimated 6 million tons of discarded foundry sand are hazardous waste. The article indicates that this
is particularly a problem with manufactorers of leaded brass. However, Dan Twarogi.AFS Director
of Research, indic?tej in this article that contamination of foundry sands "is not a huge problem".
1
•'•'•'%',
•4
i iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii in in in iiiiiii Id nil1) •'•'--,- iiirii ,-.''_
I I (I1 ! I'll I S !TB I ;i""l *"" "I!" '
-------
Based on data submitted to EPA by brass foundries, most spent foundry sands which are
hazardous wastes are classified as such because they exhibit the characteristic of toxicity for lead
D008. In addition, one brass foundry exporting its sands for use in Canada reported that the sand
exhibited the characteristic of toxicity for cadmium, D006.
2.
>s stated above, AFS has raised two particular issues for EPA's consideration: I) is spent
foundry sand a solid waste and when is it generated, and 2) what is the regulatory status of thermal
reclamation units for spent foundry sand. Each of these issues is discussed in mm.
A. Regulatory Status Under RCRA of Spent Foundry Sands and the Sand Reclamation Loop
Regarding the first issue, based on prior regulatory determinations, as well as the information
you presented about typical foundry practices, it appears that spent *^.^™J**?.on
materials- being "reclaimed," and are therefore solid wastes. This determination is made based on
the properties of the sand and the nature of typical foundry sand reclamation activities.
Used foundry sands are generated as solid wastes after being separated from the castings at
the shakeout table. At this point, the used sand contains contaminants, such as ctamte of brass fines,
and hard lumps of sand, that must be removed.from the sand prior to its reuse m the making of
molds. Tr^ the used sand is a "spem material" oecauw^
without further processing. 40 CFR § 261.1(cXl)-
The subsequent process of separating and screening return sand (sand which is fit to be reused
in mold making), core butts (clumps of sand from the core molds which are bonded wttii resui .
binders a^are unfit for mold making without furtner processiiig), h^
fines, and metal pieces appears to be a "reclamation process.' 40 CFR § 261.1(cX4).
When the spent sands enter the shakeout process, they
which involves the removal of contaminants, including core sand butts, fines,
clumps of sand too large to fit through the screens. As a spent
.
sand constitutes a solid waste. Indeed, the Agency has so held on very smular facts. fejhe
^^cSnoanv. RCRA Appeal No. 87-12 (August 1, 1989). EPA also determined on
'gS^^
to M^Joto Robbins, a project cliemist for K<)Wer G>., ^oiie year after the final
rule amending the definition of solid waste was promulgated (see enclosure).
Once the return sands are completely redaiined, removed from n« rectanatira
are being returned to the moldmaking process, they cease tote wastes and are no longer under
Sc^uris^
BP^M Airing process remains a solid and (if hazardous) hazardous waste.
Because this mechanical process of screening a* separatiiig hazard
a reclarnSn^rocess, it is generally exempt from regulation under RCRA. 40 CFR § 261.6(cXl)
(exempting actual recycling processes from regulation unless otherwise specifiea).
-------
However, with respect to the portion of foundry sands that is removed from the reclamation
process and is not beneficially reused, foundries remain subject to all applicable RCRA standards for
managing these materials under 40 CFR Part 262. These standards include manifesting and standards
for storage in tanks, containers, drip pads and containment buildings, as set out in Section 262.34. In
addition transporters of these hazardous wastes are subject to 40 CFR Part 263. Furthermore,
foundries that treat these hazardous wastes in confbrmance with these less-than-90-day storage
provisions would not be subject to RCRA permitting requirements. Our expectation is that operating
foundries should be able to operate in ways such that they do not trigger requirements for RCRA
permits pursuant to the Federal regulationsi , ; :
EPA's views about the point of generation for jurisdiction purposes do not imply that we
believe t^at the non-thermal reclamation process of screening and separating sand following the
separation of. the casting requires a RCRA Subtitle C permit. When this screening and separation of
sand is part of a reclamation process, it is exempt from RCRA Subtitle C regulation. 40 CFR
261.6
-------
AFS has argued that EPA is without jurisdiction to regulate spent foundry sands being
reclaimed because the sand is "pan of the industrial manufacturing process." However, courts have
feeld that secondary materials which either: 1) are not returned to an ongoing production process or
2) have become part of the waste disposal problem are discarded and therefore can be solid wastes
under RCRA. Also, the courts have consistently held that whenever a material stream is
characterized by an element of discard, as when a brass foundry removes and disposes of spent sands
from the sand loop, the material is part of the waste disposal problem and is subject to EPA's
jurisdiction, gee American Petroleum Institute v. EPA. 906 F.2d 729 (D.C. Cir. 1990); American
Mi-ine Congress v. EPA. 907 F.2d 1179 (D.C. Girl 1990XAMC II).
B. Regulatory Status Under RCRA of Thermal Sand Reclamation Units
For die reasons discussed below, the type of thermal sand reclamation unit discussed during
our November meeting and presented in correspondence from AFS member companies appears to
meet the Agency's definition of an incinerator and so is subject to regulation under 40 CFR Parts 264
and 265, SubpartO.
We understand that this type of thermal treatment unit consists of a combustion chamber mat
holds the spent sand and a firebox chamber immediately below, in which hot gases are generated by
the combustion of natural gas. The two chambers are separated by a refractory.membrane through
which hollow ceramic tubes and "T" nozzles allow the hot combustion gases to move from the
firebox to the combustion chambers. The flow of hot gases through .me spent sand causes me
combustion chamber to operate as a fiuidized bed. Controlled flame combustion of the organic resins
occurs in the fluidized bed. As a result, the organic resins, binders and solvents are destroyed.
Under the Agency's regulatory regime, thermal treatment devices are classified as either
boilers, industrial furnaces, incinerators, other interim status thermal treatment units, or miscellaneous
permitted treatment units. Definitions of a boiler, industrial furnace, and incinerator are provided in
40 CFR §260.10. If a thermal treatment device does not meet the definition of boiler or industrial
furnace, it is classified as an incinerator if it uses controlled flame combustion; if it does not, it is
either an interim status thermal treatment unit (Part 265 Subpart P) or a miscellaneous permitted
treatment unit (Part 264 Subpart X). -
The thermal sand reconditioning device you presented to us is not a boiler because it does not
recover and export energy. It does not meet the definition of an industrial furnace because it is not
trap fff tir «-m»«t«d ****** i~t^ « «i industrial furnace in Section 260.10. Thus, our analysis
focuses on whether the device should be regarded as either an incinerator or a miscellaneous/other
treatment unit. . • ••.
' Given tint the device uses controlled flame combustion to bum natural gas and mat the
combustion gases are exhausted into the combustion chamber containing the spent sand, the device
should be classified as an incinerator. Among omer considerations, although not dispositive'in
themselves, are: (1) the temperature in the combustion chamber would becarefully controlled to
what is claimed to be the optimum combustion temperature of the resin contaminants; and (2) the
temperature would be controlled by modulating the natural gas burner in the firebox, or, in some
designs, burners in the combustion chamber itself. .
-------
AFS has maintained that because, in its opinion, sand which is pan of the sand loop is not
discarded and therefore not a solid waste, that spent foundry sand which is destined for a thermal
reconditioning unit is also not a solid waste. For this reason, AFS maintains that thermal recondition
units of the type described in our November 16 meeting are not incinerators, but rather part of a
manufacturing process used to recondition sand for reuse within the mold making process.
For the reasons stated above, the AFS argument that spent foundry sand is not a solid waste
does not appear to be sound. To reiterate, the sand from the broken mold is not fit for its original
use as a mold without substantial reprocessing. If the sand is reprocessed through thermal
reconditioning rather than or in addition to the physical screening and separation process, it is all the
more part of the waste management problem because of the fact mat incinerators are a type of
treatment technology which clearly engages hi waste management. In this regard, the placement of
hazardous foundry sand into a thermal combustion unit is analogous to the placement of secondary
materials into surface impoundments. Bom activities may result in the release of hazardous waste to
the environment if improperly managed. AFS' argument mat mis type of thermal reconditioning unit
is simply reconditioning sand for reuse hi the moldmakihg process ignores the Act mat the organic
resins, binders and solvents used to construct the molds are destroyed in the incineration process.
The potential release of products of incomplete combustion,' such as dioxins and furans, as well as
volatile mftalg such as lead and cadmium, makes dear that management activities using these units
can be viewed as part of the waste disposal problem. In addition, the build up of metallic lead in the
resulting s«nd in a more teachable form likewise supports mis conclusion. Thermal waste treatment
units such as incinerators, like surface impoundments, are a central focus of the RCRA program.
RCRA section 3004(oX2). • As such, these units are clearly within RCRA jurisdiction and materials
placed into them can be viewed as discarded and therefore solid wastes. AjgC_E, 907 F.2d at 1186.
i ! ,
C. Other RCRA Regulatory Issues Regarding Spent Foundry Sands
The Agency notes mat mere is one circumstance when spent foundry sands are not solid
wastes. Spent foundry sand is not a solid waste under RCRA when legitimately used or reused
i without reclamation as an effective substitute fora commercial product. 40CFR § 261.2(eXlXu)- K
is our understanding that some foundry sands are currently bong ""used as a substitute for virgin silica
sand as a fluxing agent in primary copper smelting operations in Norm America. Please be aware,
however, that under Section 3006 of RCRA individual States can be authorized to administer and
enforce their own hazardous waste programs in lieu of the Federal piogram. When States are not
authorized to administer their own program, the appropriate EPA Regional office administers the
program and is the appropriate contact for any case-specific determmations. Please note as well mat
under Section 3009 of RCRA, States retain authority to promulgate regulatory requirements mat are
inore:::iirligai man Federal ^^^ requirements" .,,
3.
TTPA
Atwit Pnvir
mtal
.SjQai-MlDlE&mejg
Please understand mat the potential environmental concern is not with sand per se. Rather,
EPA is concerned that in some foundries, the used sand mixtures contain sufficient hazardous
constituents (e.g.. lead, cadmium, toxic organic compounds) to pose a threat to human health and the
environment if managed improperly. EPA has three major environmental concerns regarding
management of spent foundry sand: 1) landfill disposal of spent foundry sand, including treatment
with iron prior to land disposal, 2) thermal processing of spent foundry sand, and 3) the storage and
actual management practices for spent foundry sands prior to disposal.
-------
A. Landfill Disposal of Spent Foundry Sands; Treatment of Lead-Contaminated Sand With Iron
Filings
As discussed in our meeting and indicated in prior correspondence on behalf of AFS member
companies, some portion of spent sand is continuously removed from the sand lot? in some foundries
and disposed of in landfills. For those foundries whose sand contains hazardous constituents, such as
lead, cadmium and organics, the Agency has a sfprg interest in seeing that these sands are properly
managed. Left untreated, lead-contaminated sanc.s rrwy result in releases to groundwater, possibly
threatening nearby drinking water wells. Improper ^-iDOsal of untreated hazardous waste has
historically led to many landfills becoming Superfund sites. Thus, when foundry sands exhibiting the
hazardous characteristic for lead are land disposed, these materials must be properly treated and
disposed of in appropriate facilities in order to prevent the creation of future hazardous waste
remediation sites.
Effective treatment for hazardous waste being land disposed must assure the long-term
immobilization of hazardous constituents to minimize potential short and long term threats to human
health and the environment. RCRA Section 3004(m). We understand that some foundries attempt to
treat their hazardous waste foundry sand with iron filings prior to land disposal, in an effort to reduce
the teachability of the hazardous constituents (typically lead) so mat die waste can be land disposed.
EPA is concerned, however, that the addition of iron filings to lead-contaminated foundry sands is
ineffective as a long-term treatment method and that it could constitute impermissible dilution under
40 CFR §268.3.
In developing the Land Disposal Restriction program in the Hazardous and Solid Waste
Amendments of 1984 (HSWA), Congress stated that only dilution that occurs during the normal
manufacturing process may be taken into account in setting section 3004(m) treatment standards.
Senate Report No. 284. 98th Cong. 1st Sess. at 17. Since the addition of iron occurs only to stabilize
lead in the spent sand prior to disposal, it does not appear to be part of a normal production process.
B. Thermal Reclamation of Spent Foundry Sands
Second, we understand that mere is an increasing trend in the industry towards using a type of
thermal reclamation unit that involves combustion of the organic constituents in the foundry sand
mixture. Combustion of hazardous waste is, of course, a significant Agency concern. See U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency Strategy For HinmV1"* w«n» Minhnirarinn and Combustion.
EPA/530-R-94-04, November 1994. The Agency is concerned about the potential for lead and other
metals to be emitted from the units. Toxic organics, including products of incomplete combustion
•such as dioxins, also may be emitted. In addition, we understand mat the thermal treatment of sands
may resuh in increased teachability of lead in sand due to the build up of metallic lead in the sand.
C. Storage Prior to Disposal and Other Managemem of Spent Foundry Sands
Third, we did not discuss in the meeting in any depth what are me material management
practices within the industry. An EPA representative did, however, note mat storage of used sands
mat exhibit a hazardous characteristic because of lead from the metal castings could pose classic waste
management types of risks, depending on how the material is stored and handled.
-------
IIIH^^^^^ .
ii nil 11 ill 1 in ii ii 111 ii ii in linn 11 n n n 111 n i in n in i in n
We believe that these three types of environmental concerns address your question of how we
could consider the sand being reclaimed for further on-site use to be part of the waste management
iiiiinii
Hill 111 11 1 l|lll
iiiii(i,iiii! '.lib
problem. These concerns underlie the existing regulatory structure which we believe classifies the
sands after their ''.sein the casting process as a "spent material," which is being "reclaimed" prior to
.reuse. ' :i11
"Ill III 111PH^^ lilllii||ii|l liil|i||i|llH Illlllllllilllllllllllll 11' II llil II iii|li|i|ili|iii|iillii|i ii I i i II 111 1 hi illllii HI 11 III I iiiil l|'"l Wi*1M' 1 Iflf',,":;* !|:|. "'';fi If "I I Sill'
4, Compliance Assurance and Industry Outreach
i (i ill lijiiiiii We understood you to say to us that some meinbers of the industry do not think of the
III lll|l'''H ^^ Illlllllllllllllll I IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIII .. . . , J . . - . _ =' S 5 I S"
foundry sands being reconditioned and reclaimed for reuse on-site as a waste" being managed at the
foundry. If that is the case, there may be a need to work with you to change practices within the
industry. We hope *hat the American Foundrymen's Society and other groups would be willing to
help us with thai task and that we can organize the resources within EPA to work with you on
bringing about that change.
Conclusion
If you have any questions regarding the status of foundry sands as solid and hazardous wastes
under RCRA, please call Michael Petruska of my staff at (202) 260-8551. If you have any questions
about the status of thermal reclamation units under RCRA as incinerators, please contact Robert
Holloway of my staff at (703) 308-8461. Again, we appreciate your patience in arranging for the
*™—»''«« and your coming to Washington to discuss the issue with us.
•J-ccVL
Enclosure
cm,i H: ym&tiffltMSM^mitm i: ;
, Director
•lid Waste
!ill«^^^ 111! • Dili: -13! i llll !: I II 'M' J":,,:'1! 1 IlllH^^^^ iVillli1111! iiilllif1'1111 'i1:1]!,1!!!!",". I I'fUillH^^ IF'!1", ill!'! I '••HI! '!' XII' i III!"!' i'. II!1!11": tiff"]' '' I'!1! J ' li'iifi1!,'!!' mUWWNISM'1 llil1!"!!!!!-!!:'.1' "i:''','Jl!!l f I"!!'!'"I ' '" «Ki: S
llfMMfi/fSii'-'K I'llHli!.' I'"!,'PI
IIHIIIH^^^^ ..i.t
iiS5 stt:"
...... I :, I :M*!.i : :.!!!!:l«lll , I
ii' -iJ ' ii:1 ..... ;
...... I Til! ...... I ...... i SBl" !\W ...... * ..... II ...... ™ I ' ,1 .......... ill . ' ,ill" Ir ...... * .......... I ...... H -liitf 'i-lt ..... I1 .!" .• ' Si! .' "I ! " .. !:- 5»fl ! , '! .ili-SH! Wff iSSf? A" " ' .!' ,'.•»£? !!:!E!:!Sil ..... • :•'. :!!' I , ..... I'"!1:!,:!':;"-,1 ;?""';" < '. "". ! , ! '* g, ;h '•' •„ s'::t :X"f Miafmi ^ ? • y:- - ::• i«. is^i ' ....... 'iiiiiiiiiiii i; ..... ym:.• ;; n * M
-------
(JMOB Fwnery Co.
•IU.
6*
Uf.Ammnp
. He.
Oir MuMM. Me.
fM.
nice
EIK Mdvi ken WM. Ine.
AMERICAN FOUHDRYUEHS SOCIET^INC
publishes of moctofflewfinf
900 2nd St.. N.E.. - Suit* 109
. D.C. 20002-3557 * 202/842-4«64 *\>AX 202/8*2-4849
Mnenn EngtiMflng Ce.
Ce.
October 31, 1994 .
Mr. Michael Shapiro, Director
Office of Solid Waste, M2101 -
USEPA Waterside Mall
401 M Street S.W. ' .
Washington, D.C. 20460
Dear Mr. Shapiro:
Representatives of the American Foundrymen's Society (AFS) would like
to meet with you and David Bussard to discuss several critical policy issues
raised by recent Region 6 enforcement actions against foundries. We are
concerned that Region 6 has seriously misapplied current USEPA
regulatory policy regarding solid waste and recycling under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). • .
I. BACKGROUND
EPA Region 6 officials have targeted two brass and bronze foundries for
enforcement action under RCRA Region 6 contends that one of the
industry's primary raw materials - sand — when reused in an ongoing
production process onsite, is a solid waste. It is our understanding that the
set of facts in each of these cases is unique.
However, the two cases raise important questions regarding the agency's
application of RCRA solid waste and recycling policy to metalcastiiig
production, and potentially other manufacturing processes as welL
A vast majority of the nearly 3200 U.S. foundries cast metals — such as
iron, steel, and various nonferrous alloys - in sand molds. The industry as
a whole reuses in production nearly 94 percent of the 100 million tons of .
total sand throughput annually, which translates into an impressive
recovery rate of 94 percent The ability to repeatedly reuse sand to make
world-class castings saves virjin materials, reduces industry costs, and
-------
* .-
t <
tt POLICY RAMIFICATIONS
Sand reuse by foundries ~ a conventional industry practice -
•f^T"rVfTll Jit * m • ••» • m fiti ^.T.^.4. '*_ ' • • ' "
n
e
but from a practical standpoint, constraining or
iiniiiiiinnii i ill n i nil i inn u
* . ' .
approach to sand reuse under the RCRA regulatory framework is a whollv
relation of the law. If aDowed to stand, ft caoM^^^J^^^
ACTION NEEDED
W.c do ispgnize die agency's interest in constraining certain recycling practices and
mismanagement of materials. Accordingly, we would like to. discuss with you the
egulMory status oi f foundry sand at various points in the metalcasting process. Tne
*" *^..«»«a*«« R^on 6's pcculiar-faterpretation^RCRA
o|»ts mvolvement with the agency's solid and hazardous waste^
3 .%&» BSar occurred to us, EOT EPA staff with whom we have
5811 » I soKd waste wien reused in ongoing, onritej>roduction of molds
The potential consequences for the foundry industry, as weH as foV the agency's waste
Sff^. *™t « Borough airing of this issue at agency headquarters^oSs is^ a
Your consideration of ftp issues is greatly appreciated. We have sent a similar letter
to Mr Bussard, and will be contacting your office to arrange a convenient date and toe
Christian M. Richter ' :
AFS Washington Representative
• Ds-V *:;?-*-;'. ..... H5^ C£»r»i*-iizatfo»
Dri
ill in in mi in. 'i IF ''
u.f ft 33^. f.
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY j •' •
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 j ' -
»
* • i
. MAR 22.1935 ' - .' j :
9441.1995(11) j . •
I '
• r
MEMORANDUM • ' ' ' I
*•»='•
Decision
ssistanu /v.ii'i 111 i*ri k.*.**. j* . . ___.
and Emergency/ Response (OSWER)
Steven A/.ife'r/fcan • • • • _.„«.__
assistant Administrator ror rinioi
and Cofnpiianc'e Assurance (OECA.)
Regional Administrators (Regions I-X)
Waste I
T
for Enforcement .j
i
i
ffmf^H T3 **0V^ ^^.T^ ^ I M fllHI It I i~T W^ ^i^**^»^ ^ •»—•- — «* — f
j
|
i
Court Decision
on Kay ,. «»4. a- .s •»»*— -
. .
hazardous ^ste requirements^ of RCRA .succit e I9g4>
-f "'"
EP^
• „««,, *-*,. ^ecistant Administrators for OECA and
On May 27, 1994, the AssJ;s^Jnr ^^ for the ^"Y nf ghieaao
OSWER issued an implementation stEfJgS5n£tial strategy intended
v. EOF, decision to the Ref^f • - iilities affected by the
to bring waste-to-energy (WTE) g^jSJ^e C as quickly as
decision into compliance^^J^tated that EPA would
Tjw .purpose or urn s
-------
. '. '•;,;.;;;... ..... ;.;;••* ........ .,,.;.; . .......... ..... . ..... j
, ............... memorandum is to revise the initial implementation strategy. •
' il'TlLese ' revisions. ..... def ine ..... the .......... Agency 's ...... a£pro~ach towards management
of hazardous ash generated by WTE facilities. I
2. Determination of Point of RCRA Subtitle C Jurisdiction for
MWC Ash ' " !
' .... • !
In the city of Chicago v. EOF case, the .Supreme Court, {issued
i asy^ajTy fo'cused opinion holding that S 3001 (i) does ' not (exempt
................ ash generated by WTE facilities. • The Court, however,, failed to
•reach the 'issue of the precise point at vhich regulation of ash ,
must begin, and S 3001(i) does not expressly address the issue.
In an effort to address the issue, EPA recently published, (a
Hotice of statutory Interpretation entitled "Determination Jof
Point at Which Subtitle C • Jurisdiction Begins for Municipal; Waste
Combustion Ash at waste-to-Energy Facilities'1 (60 FR 6666, ;
February 3, 1995) . • j
As discussed in the Notice of Statutory. Interpretation, EPA
believes it is reasonable to interpret S 3001 (i) of RCRA to first
" impose hazardous waste regulation at the pO£nt that the ash
leaves the "resource recovery facility," def ined as the j —
4 combustion' building (including connected air pollution control
equlplent) ....... ". ............................. Consequently", .............. the ........ point at which- an- ash hazardous : .
"1 ..................... 'waste .......... determination should be made (and, in the future, at [which
- the Land Disposal Restrictions will begin to apply) is the point
at which ash exits the combustion building following the j .
combustion and air pollution control processes.. We emphasize
that EPA's decision on the appropriate location to make the
hazardous waste determination for WTE ash is uniquely based on
;' the Agency's interpretation of RCRA S 3001(i) . EPA's analysis
and conclusions are not relevant to facilities that do not -|f all
within the scope of RCRA S 3001(i). •
ii;; ..... ™ .......... -Jfearly every resource recovery ...... fagj_jj^ ............ £g configured j
' diflferesntiy. In several instances, these facilities are not
confined within a single- structure enclosed by four walls. ; A few
facilities, in fact, exist where the combustion device is not.
enclosed; ..... at ....... all within a building structure. Ho* *v or, lax WjTE
facilities .......... v^^^ ........... the" ........... "ash ............ always ............ moves ........ between" structures in,
enclosed conveyors, such configurations would fall within the
"common sense meaning of the "resource recovery facility* that
Congress exempted in S 3001(i). These configurations -are j
illustrated in examples one through 'three, below. In contrast,
in the fourth example, ash is exposed to the environment rather
than in an enclosed system. The definition of "resource recovery
facilit:yn does not include ash handling operations allowing;
^ e,XpOsux.e ........ to ^jjg environment. • • .' i
-------
» :
Example 1. Many resource recovery facilities automatically;
convey, via enclosed conveyor, the fly ash collected at var.ious
locations (including any air pollution control equipment such as
'the acid gas scrubbers, baghouse filters, and electrostatic;
"precipitators that may exist outside the building where thq • •
combustion device is located but are connected to the buildang
via enclosed conveyors) to a quench tank within the combustion.
" device building where it is combined with the bottom -ash., phe'
" combined ash is then loaded into .trucks for direct transpozjt to . .
an off-site disposal facility. In this example, the «re.source
recovery facility0 is composed of the combustion device budding,
the air pollution control equipment, and the enclosed conveyors.
The point at which RCRA hazardous waste jurisdiction would jbegin
for these facilities would be the point where the ash exits, the
-building housing the combustion device.' .. j
"Example 2. Several resource recovery facilities collect, the
bottom ash and the fly ash separately and convey these two psh
types separately via enclosed conveyors to an ash building (where .
the two ash types are then mixed and loaded into a transport"
vehicle for off-site disposal. "The ash building'may abut tihe
combustion device building, or it may be separate from the -; - -
combustion device building but connected by .enclosed conveyors.
"in this example, the "resource recovery facility" is. composed of
the interconnected combustion device building, the air pollution
control eouipment, the ash building, and the enclosed conveyors.
The point "at which RCRA hazardous waste jurisdiction would begin
for these facilities would be the point where the ash exitSj the
ash building. • • • • 1
• !
Example 3. A few resource recovery facilities exist where jthe.
combustion device is. not housed within a building. In thes;e
instances, the combustion device, the air pollution .control;
equipment, the proximate enclosed ash handling areas, and the
interconnecting enclosed conveyors constructively constitute the
"resource recovery facility." Thus, if fly ash-and bottom jash
were handled in an enclosed- system that operates in the same
manner as if a building existed and the fly ash-and bottom ash
were mixed in an enclosed unit proximate to the combustion j .
device, that management activity would be considered to take
place within a "resource recovery facility." In this example,
the point at which RCRA hazardous waste jurisdiction would begin
would be the point where the combined ash exits the-last enclosed
. ash management unit that is located proximate to the combustion _
device. . •••}••.
-------
: », , « r. ]» .'
Example 4. Some resource recovery facilities may collect bottom
ash within the building housing the combustion device and dollect
the fly ash outside the combustion device building in a mariner'
that exposes that ash to the .environment; for example, in j-oll-
off containers. In these instances, the "resource recovery
facility" is composed of the building housing the combustion '
device as well as the air pollution control equipment. In -this
example, RCRA hazardous waste jurisdiction begins at the twp exit
points from the "resource recovery facility,? specifically,; at:
(1) the' .......... "point where the bottom ash ultimately leaves the :
combustion device building and (2) the point where the fly (ash
becomes exposed to the environment as it' is discharged from the
air pollution control equipment into open roll-off containers.
The-WTE facility operator would «ws mate a hazardous waste
determination at each location. Should the .operator determine
that either the bottom ash or fly ash is hazardous, management of
that ash would have to be conducted pursuant to RCRA Subtitle C.
• , , ........................ ' ........ * ','',- j
If you have any questions about EPA's S 3001 (i) • »
interpretation, please contact Andrew Teplitzky (703-308-7275) or
Allen Geswein (703-308-7261) of OSWER, or Kate Anderson (202-564-
4016) or Andrew Cherry (202-564-5011) of OECA. j . _
Xatpleneirtafcion Strateg . ! •
3--
;u In the Hay 27, 1994 implementation strategy, EPA :
"acknowledged that, for economic and technical reasons, it would
be difficult for affected facilities to immediately comply .with
the gjtv of Chicago v. EDF decision and all applicable RCRA
Subtitle C requirements. In recognition of <->^g difficulty, EPA
adjusted its enforcement priorities for three months for •
facilities to implement an ash testing program, and for 6 months
during which- all WTE ash could be disposed of in solid waste '
management units in compliance with 40 CFR Part 258 . . Through
I these actions, -EPA has . demonstrated a commitment to working! with
states and the regulated universe to phase affected facilities
-into cpmpliance with Subtitle C with minimal disruption of. yaste
handling practices at HTE facilities. I •
• . . • ' . ' . !
EPA now believes, ............ that ........ all ...... affected,, ....... facilities should be on
notice of the duties imposed by the Supreme Court ''in the Ci'tv of
ja3.i.ca.gq_y- EDF decision and its ramifications for the managjement
of hazardous ash. Since all TOE facilities should now have;
programs in place to make hazardous waste determinations of! their
ash, the Agency expects these facilities to manage ash. -that; is
! ....... , y ........ n I,, ..... Determined to .......... fee ........ ,,a ...... hazardous waste in full compliance with RCRA
lull liliiilil'l iii II i ililillii I'll 111 II Illlllllll i ill hi i I (I Ml I Hi 1 in 1 i 1 i I 1 Illlllllll i nli IIIII Illillili llillliiliillillll l ill ill
-------
2- Situations Presenting Potential Health and •Environmental
Threats and Releases of Hazardous Constituent:^ :
In all circumstances, when considering appropriate " 1
enforcement responses for potential violations of Subtitle-C
Agency personnel should consider whether a facility may be J
managing .its WTE ash in an environmentally irresponsible manner
posing a potential threat to human health and the environment. •
Regions should, of course, bring actions", pursuant to RCRAiS
7003, upon information that improper handling of any ash (whether
• it is hazardous or not) may present an. aunminent and substantial
endangerment. In addition, Regions should evaluate whether
. formal enforcement actions pursuant to RCRA S 3008(h) are ''•
appropriate in the event the Agency has information that there is
or has been a release of a hazardous waste or hazardous :
constituents from a facility subject to interim status for l-
management of hazardous ash. j
• . •* ' |
3- Enforcement Actions Under RCRA Section '3QQa(a-) !
I
As discussed above, EPA now. expects all generators to'have
in place an effective hazardous -waste' determination program-'
including sampling arid analysis where appropriate.1 facilities *
wlu.cn have failed to set up and implement a method to determine
whether their ash .exhibits a hazardous waste characteristic are
appropriate targets for enforcement response: j
«. • . 5? -^ awarei however, that because of configurations unique
to individual facilities, some facilities may not combine fly ash
and bottom ash before it exits the "resource recovery facility."
Such facilities may now have to make separate hazardous waste
determinations at separate locations for both bottom ash and fly
ash. While the previous implementation strategy allowed any WTE
facility to sample and test combined bottom ash and fly asht the
Agency's recent § 3001(i) interpretation of "resource recovery
facility" may now require some WTE facilities to make separate •
««,**. -On Hay 24' 1994' osw issued draft •'Sampling and Analysis
of Municipal Refuse Incineration Ash Guidance" which assists
generators that do not have guidance, in place to make a hazardous
waste determination in accordance with 40 CFR S 262.4. This
manual was intended to provide- guidance to waste-to-energy I
facilities on hov to sample and analyze .ash to determine whether
it is a hazardous waste, since the release of the initial •
implementation strategy, OSW published a'Federal Register Notice
of Availability requesting comment-on the draft (59 FR 32427,
June 23, 1994}. The public comment period closed on September
21, 1994, and^osw is currently evaluating the comments. The
final manual is projected to be released in the Spring of 1995.
- EpA continues to encourage the use of the draft (and when
y1 J ffaT 3'9&A ^v* A
-------
determinations on the fly ash and bottom ash. -EPA will very'
likely regard as an indicator of environmentally irresponsible
management of hazardous ash (which -may warrant an enforcement
*ctxon under RCRA § 3008(a)) any failure to implement* within 75
Syf °f,thendate °J.the.Februaj:y 3' «95, interpretive notice (60
ZS 6666) , all modifications to existing hazardous waste : :
determination programs necessary to allow, separate hazardous
waste determinations, for fly ash and bottom ash. . During the
first 75 days, however, environmentally sound management of ash '
in accordancewith the results of combined testing is unlikelv to
merit an enforcement response.- • - . |
If you have specif ic -questions as to the appropiiate I..--
enforcement response for a particular situation, please 'contact
Ma** PoUins.:(202-5$4_-_4001) or Kate Anderson (202-564-4016)' of -
OECA-RCRA Enforcement Division. . - • .
• - . "" '• , ' ', . ,, I - . .
&,|S}S,liyou"foz> your' continued support in ensuring the-proner-
ffiSS^eraent • of hazardous WTS ash. if you have any -question^
• regarding this revised implementation strategy, please have vour
staff contact Mark Pollins (202-564-4001) or Kate Anderson : (202 -
i ....... i ............... ^64-40J.6 ................. of ........... QECA-Office ............... of ......... Regulatory Enforcement, Andrew i
.........
I
ill ill 1
I
ccr Scott C.'Fulton, OECA .
Tim Fields, OSWER •
Robert Van Heuvelen, OECA/ORE
Elaine G. Stanley, OECA/OC
Sari Dgvgaey, 'OECA/OCE . "
Michael Shapiro, OSWER/OSW
Regional Counsel (I-X)
Regional Waste Management Division Directors (I-X)
• Regional Counsel Branch Chiefs (I-X)
Regional Waste Branch Chiefs•(I-X) '
.•> Susan'Bromm, OECA/OC • . • -,
Susan O'Keefe, OECA/ORE ' "
" Bruce Weddle, OSWER/OSW
Dev Barnes, OSWER/OSW ' . '
.Lisa Friedman, OGC '
David Nielsen, OECA/ORE • '
|Marj!:i PolJ jjis/ OECA/ORE
Gary" Jonesi7 OECA/ORE" . . . ' .
.Mirni Guernica, OECA/OC
Terrance Grogan, OSWER/OSW ' • .
Jon Silberman, OECA/ORE
Andrew Cherry, OECA/OC ' . ..''•'
Kate Anderson, OECA/ORE'-
Andrew Teplitzky, OSWER/OSW
Allen Geswein, • OSWER/OSW. " ' '
Tina Kaneen, OGC
inn ii iiiiiii
./i
-------
HOTLINE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
9441.1995(12)
March 1995
RCRA
4. Definition of Formerly Bevili Exempt
Wastes
According to 40 CFR §268.1 (e)(3), wastes
identified of listed as hazardous waste after
November 8,1984, are not subject to land
disposal restrictions (LDR) until EPA
promulgates prohibitions or treatment
standards. For purposes of LDR, certain
mineral processing wastes which were
formerly exempt under the Bevill Amendment,
but lost that exemption are considered to be '
newfy identified and therefore not subject to
LDR until EPA promulgates standards'
specific to this category of wastes. What
wastes are included within this category of
formerly exempt Bevill wastes?
On November 19,1980, EPA
promulgated an exclusion from regulation
under RCRA Subtitle C for, "solid waste
from the extraction, beneficiation, and
processing of ores and minerals (including
coal), including phosphate rock, and
overburden for the mining of uranium ore"
(45 EE 76618,76620). This is one of the
exclusions commonly referred to as a
Bevill exclusion. In this JFederal Register.
EPA clarified that the exclusion covered
"...solid waste from the exploration,
mining, milling, smelting and refining of
ores and minerals" (45 £R 76619). On
September 1,1989, EPA published a final
rule that narrowed the scope of the
exclusion as it applies to mineral
Spedficalh
mineral processing wastes and
conditionally excluded twenty wastes
pending additional studies. After
completing a study of the twenty wastes,
EPA removed five of the wastes that had
been subject to the September 1,1989,
conditional exclusion, bringing the total
number of excluded mineral processing
wastes to twenty (55 FR 2322; January 23,
1990). On June 13,199.1, EPA finalized
this list of twenty exempt mineral •
processing wastes in §261.4(b)(7) (56 EEL
27300). All other mineral processing
wastes are subject to RCRA Subtitle C
Wastes from the extraction/beneficiation
of ores and minerals remain covered by
the exclusion generally, and are not subject
to Subtitle C.
EPA considers all mineral-processing
wastes which are not currently listed in
§261.4(b)(7), to be newly identified wastes
and therefore not subject to LDR
requirements until treatment standards are
promulgated. Treatment standards for
these wastes are currently being developed
as pan of the court-ordered LDR Phase IV
Proposed Rule.
-------
Ill I 11111 111 II
II 111 111 Illllllllllll III Illllll
II Illllll I Illllll I Illllllllllll
111 I 111 III Illllll II II•111 I Illllllllllll Illllllllllll Illllllllllll
JKS linihiRi 'iiiiniiJpiiiiiiiiiiJ!:', jiiiiiiiiiingiininnniii ^i ! iii!' i >'v' iJ • i, "i; i n^ ji1'!1'"j in ;i;ni ,„" :«ijiiwipiiii "'»iiii iiiiiiinii'' iiiiiiiwiiiiiiiiiiiiLiiiiiiiniigini^ 'i,;ii!: acini: °f jiijiFiiiiiliiiiitMi iiiiiiiii^iiiiiuiiiiiiiiiiHiii''!!:;!, m 'iiiii'kKinnai »,«<: i':..,!»«t!';; •• vh* jiiii!, j"* 111111;' snip;*'1 :: I'i'iiiii1 ii''ai!E'uiiii^i^ i:iir:;i:i- ^^pi* t'l ^^^ i?f£Ll;iw iV'fiffr'j I'lS'' i'5itipi:5!''1:ii!'a!ijiii'":"iv5i*13!'ii:'i"-ii"t vi" H'tsjiiii,1'1 Si" '»,;vffsH
-------
HOTLINE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
• 9441.1995(13)
March 1995
3. Hotel Dry Cleaning Waste and the
Household Waste Exclusion
A hotel generates spent solvents from its
on-site dry cleaning facility. For purposes of
the 40 CFR §261.4(b)(l) household waste
exclusion, EPA defines households to include
hotels and motels. Will hotel dry cleaning
wastes be excluded from RCRA Subtitle C
regulation as household waste?
Wastes produced by a hotel dry cleaning •
facility are not household wastes and therefore
will not be excluded from RCRA hazardous
waste regulation. A waste has to meet two
conditions to be excluded as household waste.
Household waste must be generated on the
premises of a temporary or permanent
residence and be comprised primarily of
materials generated by consumers in their
homes. In general, wastes from hotels and
motels will be excluded as household waste as
long as the waste is similar to the type of
waste that consumers generate in their home.
Even though generated on premises of a
temporary residence (i.e. hotel), dry cleaning
waste is not household waste because the
spent solvents from the dry cleaning
operations are not similar to wastes typically
produced by a consumer in the home. The dry
cleaning wastes produced by the hotel do not
meet both criteria for household waste and
will not qualify for the household waste
exclusion per §261.4(b)(l) (49 ER 44978;
November 13,1984).
-------
in i iiiiiii ii iiiiini i in nil nil in 11111111111111111111111111 in iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiii i iiiiiiii i UK i iiiiii iiUiiyi i'lijiis. in in n i i ii i i in i in i i n ill i inn l 11 i iiiiiii in 111111 in In n i i in i n i i 1111 iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiii u iiiili
I IIIIIII K"'II 111 I I1 II IIIIIIII I II 1 llli I ill1 MI nil Ill I il 111 III1 I I I II Ill ill 1 i ill
• - ::,,M: ::• 'j • r T i .- T-. • :. This Page Intentionally Left Blank
11 i i (HI i
Mi I i I i i Hi I i ill IIIIIII I 111 I II Hi "111 11 II I
111(1 1 I ii llllil
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460
9441.1995(14)
APR 12 1995
OFFICE OF
SOLD WASTE AND EMERGENCY
. RESPONSE
Mr. John M. Adams, Jr.
Senior Attorney
American Electric Power Service Corporation
1 Riverside Plaza
Columbus, OH 43215
Dear Mr. Adams:
This letter follows up our March 10, 1995, meeting. ' At that
-meeting, the American Electric Power Service Corporation (AEP)
asked for EPA's interpretation of whether scrubber waste leaving
the bottom of a scrubber in a closed-loop flue gas desulfurization
system owned and operated by AEP would be considered a "solid
waste" as the term is defined in the Solid Waste Disposal Act of
1965. AEP has also asked whether EPA would consider the system
processing the waste, as described in the enclosed, materials
provided by AEP, as having a solid waste disposal function.
We understand that as part of its compliance with the
- clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, AEP chose to install scrubbers^at
its Gavin 2600-MW generating station. According to the materials
provided by * AEP, the facilities collect and separate .calcium
sulfite solids which come from the SO2 lime scrubber (identified as
the absorber vessel in the diagram) by separating the solids from
the scrubber liquid. The scrubber liquid from the top of the
thickeners is returned to the scrubber via » clo.sed-loop system
(i.e., no liquid discharge from the system). The thickened solids
are removed and further processed prior to disposal in a landfill.
1 Using EPA's current solid waste regulations codified at 40 CFR
Parts 260 & 261 and the materials provided by AEP, it is our
interpretation that the scrubber waste would be considered a sludge
which, if discarded (i.e., disposed of), would be considered a,
solid waste (40 CFR 261.2). The term "sludge" is defined at 40.CFR
260.10 as "any solid, semi-solid, or liquid waste generated from a
municipal, commercial, or industrial wastewater treatment plant,
water supply treatment plant, or air pollution control facility
exclusive of the treated effluent from a wastewater treatment
plant." The scrubber waste, which is generated at your air
pollution control facility, clearly falls within this definition of
sludge.
-------
iliiiiiii in i in 1 nil iiiiiii iiiiiiiiii ii iii ii i ii 11 i ii i ill iiiiiiii n 11 IN ni i ill i iiiiiii ii 11 nil 1 in 11 1111111 mil 11 ii HI uii i i .. _ . _
We aiso believe the scrubber waste would be considered a
waste under the definition of solid waste found in the Solid Waste
Disposal Act of 1965: . .
•«Theterm solid waste means garbage, refuse, or other
discarded materials, including soiad-waste materials resulting
from industrial, commercial, and agricultural operations, and
from community activities, but dot* not include »olids or
dissolved material in domestic sewage or «^cr .f1^"*0*"*
poXTuEinEs in watlir resources, such as silt, dissolved or
Suspended solids in industrial waste water effluents,
dissolved materials in irrigation return flows or other common
: water pollutants." •"" •
As noted on page 2 of the enclosed "First Report to Congress:
Resource Recovery and Source Reduction," delivered to Congress on
pSruary 22, 1973, even though our understanding of solid waste was
no? as sophisticated as it is today, K»A did consider the term
municipal waste to ". . .include residential, commercial, demolition,
street and alley sweepings, and miscellaneous (e.g., sludge
disposal) (emphasis added) ."
Based on this information, we would consider the scrubber
waste leaving the absorber vessel to be a sludge and a solid waste,
according to both the definition of solid waste included in the
Solid Waste Disposal Act of 1965 and EPA's current regulations.
If you have a^^a'ItioM'.or would n*i&o discuss this_matter
further, please contact me or Angela Cracchiolo of «y staff at
(202)260-0163.
. Thank ....... you ............. ::::f or ............ your ............ "iiteriit' ................... 'in .............. the «af e "and ..... effective
management of solid waste.
Sincerelyj
Michael Shapiro, Director
Office of Solid Waste
Enclosures
-------
FILE copy
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460
APR 201995
9441.1995(15)
OFFICE OF
. SOLO WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
Mr. W. J. Sweeney . -
Manager, Environment Department
Alyeska Pipeline '•
1835 South Bragaw Street
Anchorage, Alaska 99512
Dear Mr. Sweeney: - .
description for K050 listed hazardous waste.
materials." .
.EPA provided further clarification on this provisicn in_the
2SSSS.& ££-'«54.t--jgSfe*g3TLi:
removed from the tank^ vessel, or_uni ^ •^St.t.a «or itsjwcima
where_a_tank, JT
i^^ l^Sa.T3LB!. 'f,.1 ^lS5^Xt^^g £
owner/operator the accumulation period begins tne y
manufacturing process unit.is shut down.
Agency's int«nt to
-------
p n i I nil i in i mill iiiiiii iiiiiii in 11 i ii it i ii" i i i mi i i i nil in i iiiiiii
ska pipeline
I ISERVCE COMFWrt 1I3S SOUTH 6MGAWSTBEET ANCHCflAGE. ALASKA MS1J TELEPHONE (907)27»-1611.FAX26V«11.TELEX
' . • ; : ' '• "'
' " • • ' i •
December 23,1994 . APSC Letter #94-2663 G
Michael Shapiro ' . . _
Director ' • ,
Office of Solid Waste ' .
US Enyjronmental. Protection Agency ' ' •
401 M Street " - ' ' '
Washington, D. C. 20460 - ' •" ^ \
SUBJECT: INTERPRETATION OF TIME OF GENERATION OF HEAT
EXCHANGER BUNDLE CLEANING SLUDGE
Dear Mr. Schapiro: " ^ .
i ...
AJyeska Pipeline Service Company (Alyeska) is the operator of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline
• System (TAPS). TAPS transports crude oil from North Slope oil fields to a Valdez,
. 'Alaska marine terminal where the crude oil is loaded on tankers for transportation to
lower 48 states' refineries. As a part of TAPS, Alyeska operates three crude oil topping ":
units (eofJJ) "at pump £tatlpns']§, 8","an3'lQ^nie COTU distill fuel to operate pump ' *
station machinery from the crude oil transported by TAPS. 'The COTU are complying
with 40 CFR § 261.32, designating' heat exchanger bundle cleaning sludge from the
petroleum refining industry as a listed hazardous waste (K050). However, because of the
unique title of thfs-waste type "heat exchanger bundle cleaning sludge from the petroleum t
refining industry" (emphasis added) Alyeska wishes to clarify when K050, heaF exchanger*
• bundle cleaning sludge, is generated as hazardous waste. • • .
' • • ' •
Alyeska has examined known EPA documents discussing K050 waste. That examination
yielded the following information: . • .
First, OSWER Memorandum 9441.1985 (29) discusses the five waste steams generated
by petroleum refineries, including KOSO. Unfortunately, of these five waste streams the
memorandum does not discuss when KOSO is "generated."
Second, the "Listing Background Document, Petroleum Refining,* November i4,'!i980,
• for K048-K052, pages 689-690, provided the following statement about the generation of
K050:
Heat exchanger bundles are cleaned during plant shutdown to remove
deposits of scale and sludge. Depending upon the characteristic of the
deposits, the outside of the two bundles may be washed, brushed, or
•" sandblasted, while the tubes inside can be wiped, brushed, or rodded out.
-------
s
Changing to another matter, I ask you to respond to a letter, Alyeska Letter No. 94-2183-
G, that Jordan Jacobsen, an Alyeska attorney, sent you with respect to interpreting 40
CFR § 261 4 (c). Mr. Jacobsen sent you that letter on May 9,1994 and has not yet
received an answer. I understand that a Ms. Anne Cadrington (sp?), of your staff, was
working on that request. Alyeska would appreciate a response to that request with and at
the same time you answer this letter. .
We would appreciate a response to the information and interpretations provided in this-
letter no later than February 15,1995. If no response is received, Alyeska will proceed
with the assumption that EPA does not disagree. Please contact Carol Garrison of my
stafi£ (907) 265-8634, if you have any questions on this matter. • • . ;
' Sincerely,
W. J. Sweeney
Manager, Environment Depz
WJW-.csp
-23
-------
f IllllllilllllllllP I lliliil1 iilliiillll i i1 lllllllll'Niiilii I in lull Iilllll i •111 I'l I Hi I I "I '1 1 "111 111 i i i i I, II1 i HI1
111 I I
iiii iiiiiiiiiii ill n iiiiiiii iiiiiii i i
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
1 I 'ill llllllnril"'..":!'!1
1 |M"
-------
HOTLINE QUESTIONS AND ANSWFRS^
April 1995
(ig)
RCRA
1. Status of Fossil Fuel Combustipn
Waste Exclusion
In 1980, EPA temporarily exempted,
among other things, large volume fossil fuel
combustion wastes from RCRA Subtitle C
regulation, pending further study and issuance
of a final regulatory determination regarding
these wastes. What is the current regulatory
status of fossil fuel combustion wastes?
The regulatory status of fossil fuel
combustion wastes is dependent upon the type
of waste generated. Fossil fuel combustion
wastes have been divided into two categories,
independently managed large volume coal-
fired utility wastes and remaining wastes, each
having different schedules for regulatory
determination. On August 9,1993, EPA
made the final regulatory determination on the
first category, retaining the exclusion of
independently managed large volume coal-
fired utility wastes from RCRA Subtitle C
regulation (58 FR. 42466). This category
includes fly ash, bottom ash, boiler slag, and
flue gas emission control waste. EPA has
deferred the final regulatory determination on
remaining wastes; they continue to be
excluded from Subtitle C until that
determination is made in 1998. The
remaining waste category includes wastes
from utilities burning other non-coal fossil
fuels, wastes from non-utility boilers burning
any type of fossil fuel, large volume coal-fired
utility wastes that are co-managed with low
volume wastes that are produced in
conjunction with the combustion of coal, and
wastes generated by fluidized bed combustion
operations. Low volume coal combustion
wastes that are not co-managed with the large
volume waste enumerated in RCRA do not
benefit from the exclusion. Examples of low
volume wastes that are not excluded if they
arc not co-managed include: boiler blowdown,
coal pile runoff, cooling tower blowdown,
demineralizer regenerate and rinses, metal and
boiler cleaning wastes, pyrites, and sump
effluents. Based on the original scope of the
exclusion, these wastes have always been
subject to Subtitle C regulation when, managed
independently.
-------
till - J• i (:!; • : •«-:*• ,. • :,; «! i,;,!:,T I: *rfi "1;,•> it. .* p.;,'' - i ,a, i : "u?.\tf,t s ,, s- .x*1, 'ni j
'., il.' i' la.^ii'.Wj;.^ .,. \ Sri
ivwm mm
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
!L "i .iNiiKii..!::1!:;1 „ i iiiiiiniBi ;•»,'; siiii niiiiiiiu11 v < "is aif,,;: ;;i "iiiii <'::" ,:uni
MilJIlli ,.: iii,,.,,,!, •! MI ill ,»"',!; „,'':' H :> 'i" ,i1!!!1 ^ !! '..Tfll!1! ' 'if'11'•,'•," ..||1"!!i, • i",""ii'.; Ji:i|iLJ' i!"i!,,.,;" I,' .'t1',."!,,", "'fflll!:1!' "'Uii.;!! !!',„','' IIBii.yJIL1 ,l|1!i"",ii:i !'!!!'; 'nil, I, I i! 1 '' i Jl.'ti'ii,,','": li'i'iWi,,!"1!;!1 • UPi! JJi .1 '•'il||!!nlil!.i, "P1 ,:,:,€ •»!' •II1' \ff Urii! •» '.iJifl
..... liU^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ..... Hi! ..... tili^K ........ ?:M^^^ ....... IK ..... iiil ......
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
9441.1995(17)
OFFICE OF
^^ SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
Ralph J. Colleli, Jr., Esq.
American Petroleum Institute
1220 L Street, Northwest • ,
Washington, D.C. 20C05 . .
Dear Mr. Colleli:
This responds to the American Petroleum Institute's (API)
request for clarification and/or reconsideration of certain
provisions contained in the Environmental Protection Agency's
(EPA) final rule on recovered oil. (59 FR 38536, July 28, 1994).
Specifically, API requested clarification on: .1) the regulatory-
status of recovered oil from petroleum refineries with
petrochemical processing units located at the facility; and 2)
the regulatory status of recovered oil from petroleum refineries
that share their wastewater treatment systems with co-located
petrochemical facilities. In addition, API requested that the
Agency reconsider portions of the rule pertaining to: 1) the
requirement that recovered oil be inserted into the refining
process "prior to distillation or catalytic cracking"; 2) the
regulatory status of primary oil/water separators;, and 3) the
regulatory status of petroleum cokers.
A. Request for Clarification of Recovered Oil Provisions
1) Status of Recovered Oil from Refineries with Synthetic
Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry (SOCMI) Units
The recovered oil rule provides an exclusion from RCRA
regulation for oil that is recovered from "normal" petroleum
refinery operations and inserted into the petroleum refining
process prior to distillation or catalytic cracking
'(§261.4(a) (12)). Under this provision, oil recovered from a-
petroleum refinery's wastewater treatment system is excluded from
RCRA regulation if it is inserted into designated refinery
process points. Since promulgation of the recovered oil rule,
API has pointed out that a number of petroleum refineries also
operate petrochemical processing units on-site and that
-------
1 111 IIII 111 ill
i liii i i nil in n
wastewater from these units is discharged into the refinery's
wastewater treatmentsystem. According to API, the wastewater
from theseunitsrepresents 2%-12% of the total refinery
wastewater volumes and rarely contains recoverable oil. The
question posed by API is whether the recovered oil exclusion
applies to'oil recovered from petroleum refineries with SOCMI
units on-site.
While EPA did not -specifically address this question in the
recoveredoilrule, the Agency intended that the exclusion apply
to refineries with on-site petrochemical processing units. EPA
views these SOCMI unit's"" as part of the normal petroleum refining
operation. Therefore, the presence of these units at a petroleum
refining facility does not preclude the refinery's eligibility
for the recovered oil exclusion. '
2)
Status of Recovered Oil'from Co"-Located' Petroleum Refineries
and Petrochemical Facilities .
API also brought to EPA's attention the fact that petroleum
refineries, and petrochemical facilities that are proximally
located often share the same wastewater tfreatmeht: :systeih. -"The
co-located facilities are generally owned and operated by the
same parent company. However, the facilities maybeseparately
'; owned and operated in some instances The question raised by API
regarding co-located facilities is essentially the same as that
posed by "the previous situation involving on-site SOCMI units,
namely, whether the recovered oil exclusion applies to oil
recovered from wastewater treatment systems that service both
petrochemical and petroleum refining * operations. The difference
in this case is that the petrochemical processes are located off-
site of thepetroleum refining facility.
The Agency's intent in crafting the recovered oil exclusion
was to limit its applicability to oil recovered from petroleum
industry sources. Accordingly, the exclusion specifically does
not apply to oil generated from non-petroleum industries.
However, the exclusion does apply broadly to. oil generated from
both on- arid of f Tsite sources within the petroleum industry
(e.g.', the exclusion applies to oil generated from exploration
and production activities). As previously noted/ the.
relationship between petroleum refineries .and petrochemical
processing operations was not specifically .addressed in the
recovered oil rule. However,, based on information provided by
API and the ' Chemical Ffe^facturers Association^ EPA believes
that, in cases where petrochemical and petroleum refining
operations are co-located and share a common wastewater treatment
system, the integration between the two.facilities is such that-
the petrochemical facility falls within scope of the exclusion.
Ill I Ill I N ill ii||i|i| lllllll|ii|i|ill(iilliil|ili||ii|l| 111!
11 In liii lull
....... hi iii
in
in npi 11 n in in
-------
In these situations, given the common wastewater treatment system
and the predominance of petroleum refining wastewater, the
petrochemical operation would be considered part of normal
petroleum refining. The exclusion would therefore apply tooil
recovered from a wastewater treatment system that a refinerv
shares with a co-located petrochemical facility. The exclusion
would not? however, apply to recovered oil from a Pe^ochemical
facility that is sent to a petroleum refi-ery for recycling via
any route other than a shared wastewater treatment system (e.g.,
via truck, rail, etc).
B. Request for Reconsideration of Recovered Oil Provisions
1)" Polni- of Insertion
The recovered oil exclusion is limited to recovered oil that
is inserted into the refining process "prior to distillation or
catalytic cracking." This restriction is based on statutory
language restricting insertion of recycled materials to points in
the petroleum process where -separation of contaminants" occurs.
API Claims that, by specifying allowable insertion-points (i.e.,
orior to distillation or catalytic cracking),. EPA has too
narrowly defined those petroleum refining processes in "£ich
contaminant removal occurs. API cites previous Federal Register
notices as well as legislative history that support a broader
interpretation of the types of refinery processes that perform
separation of contaminants. In addition, API has Provided
examples of other petroleum refining process units in which
contaminant removal occurs (e.g., fractionation units located
downstream of the catalytic cracker), The Agency finds API s
arguments to be compelling in this case and agrees that EPA erred
by equating "separation of contaminants" with "distillation or
catalvtic cracking" in the recovered oil rule. The-Agency plans
to issue a technical correction to address this error as soon as
possible given resource constraints. ...
2) fftatus of Primary Oil/Water Separators as Waste Management
Units ...
API has requested that the Agency reconsider its position
regarding the regulatory status of refinery wastewaters and
walteSSlr treatment systems. EPA considers refinery wastewaters
to be discarded materials and therefore solid wastes potentially
subject to regulation under RCRA. Likewise, primary wastewater
treatment systems are potentially subject to r^l^i^ «« - _
hazardous waste management units under RCRA. For reasons clearly
stated in the preamble to the recovered oil rule, the Agency does
not believe that this determination warrants reconsideration. -
-------
I1, iL'iitiliNilillr, .."M'B1: , '"nil '
ll'l'llilll '',1 If 111
,111, lll'llf t'fllillF1 MliH In",:,
3) Status of Petroleum Refinery Cokers
1111 II Illl 111 I I III III I II 111 111 II II II 111 III I II11 III III I II III III III I II I II I 11 III I II I III I I I 1111 II I I I II II II I III I III I 11
API has also asked that EPA review its position on how
petroleum cokers that receive hazardous wastes are regulated
tinder RCRA. API believes that cokers are part of the refining
process and so should be designated as petroleum refining process
" issits. It iMiis important to note here that the regulatory status
changed as a result of the
.oil rule , iiiThe reference in, the preamble to cokers as
* exempt recycling units" was mearly meant to clarify that these
jinlts ............... are ...... i ........ not _regulated under RCRA.
EPA is currently reviewing the issue of how cokers that
receive. ............. hazardous ............. wastes ......... should ...... ...fee ....... regulated under RCRA . This
review was prompted in part by concerns raised by API in response
tp the recovered oil rule. Additionally, however, EPA is
reviewing the regulatory status of colcers in the context of the
Agency's upcoming proposal on petroleum refining residuals of
concern. As you know, EPA is required under a consent agreement
with the EnYir.o.nmentai ............ Defense ........ £un_d .............. te ......... sake. ............ listing • . •
determinations ......... ;pjj ............... ,1| ............. .specifically identified petroleum refinery
residuals . Since a number of these residuals are routinely fed
•to ..... the ................ cpker, ............ the ............. question of whether this practice is part of
the ............ petroleum ......... refining ...... process' ..... of" ~'a ............... form ........ of ' waste " management will
have to be addressed within the listing proposal. . EPA therefore
•hopes to use the listing proposal as a forum to address the
general issue of how petroleum cokers sEbiilci be regulated under
RCRA. The listing proposal is scheduled to be published in
August of .............. 1995. [[[ ' ...........
I hope this letter has addressed your concerns. Please feel
free to call Mike Petruska of my staff at (202) 260-8551 with any
additional questions or concerns yon may have.
: ................................ - .................. ' ............................ Sincerely,
I Michaejl Shapiro, Director
i-€/V^ OffjLcg of Solid Waste,
-------
r'lLE COPY
1 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
° WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
9441.1995(18)
MAY 25 1995 . OFF1CEOP
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
Mr. William A. Spratlin, Director
Air, RCRA, and Toxics Division
EPA Region.VII
726 Minnesota Avenue
Kansas /City,. KS 66101
Dear M^^pratlin: ' .
This is in response to. your April 6, 1995 letter regarding the
regulatory status of a gasification unit -that Texaco proposes to build
at its El Dorado, Kansas petroleum refining facility. We have decided
to support your decision to concur with the Kansas Department of
Health and Environment's proposed approval of a permit exemption for
the facility. Our decision is related to the facts specific to this
particular situation and should not be viewed as a determination that
all gasification units are exempt from RCRA permitting requirements.
The remainder of this letter is devoted to a discussion of the
rationale for our position"regarding the El Dorado facility.
Based upon our consultations with your office and with the state
of Kansas and upon our April 12th meeting with representatives from
Texaco (several of whom came in to meet with us the day after your
letter arrived), OSW identified a need to clarify the regulatory
status of the gasification unit that Texaco proposes to bring on-line
at its El Dorado, Kansas petroleum refining facility. These
clarifications focus on the three principal components of the • .
gasification process, as proposed for this facility: (1) the
regulatory status of the "syngas" created by the gasifier, (2) the
status of the unit itself and (3) the use of RCRA-listed hazardous
wastes as feedstocks for the gasifier.
yha 9SVHOA8"
The syngas produced by the gasifier in El Dorado would be exempt
from RCRA regulation according to the provisions of 40 CFR _
§261.6(a)(3)(iv>, which exempts "fuels produced from the refining of
oil-bearing hazardous wastes along with normal process streams at a
petroleum refining facility if such wastes result from normal^
petroleum refining; production, and transportation practices. Of
course any residuals from the gasification process would need to be
evaluated under 40 CFR §261 in order to determine whether or not they
are subject to regulation as hazardous waste under RCRA.
-------
Ill III IIII III I I 111
HUP 111 III Nil
II lliliillllllllill I 11111II
111 111 llllllllllll I ill I III 111
III 111
The Ga si.fi.ea tlon Ptai. t
The unit that Texaco proposes to construct in El Dorado would
also be exempt from regulation. In our judgement the gasifier would
be an exempt recycling unit as provided for under 40 CFR §261.6(c)(1).
1 Based on our analysis, the gasifier proposed for use at the El Dorado
facility does not meet the definition of "an "incinerator, a boiler or
j industrial furnace, as defined in 40 CFR ,260_. -10. Therefore,, this unit
would not be subject to the incinerator standards set forth in"40 CFR
264, Subpart O or the BIF standards set forth in 40 CFR 266, Subpart
•"EL H".'
llliilM
(III I i
Tbm
Si Mi: ili:3l B S'S' ....... i!' !f ill"!" ' i
> . ..... :l:i, • 4 IF • * H: ..... • i!!!111 " • ; :':•:!; "OT .....
• ''Sill
.............................. i ...... _ [[[
Based on your ............ prcscnta'tioh,11 "the" ' feeds' tbck ........... to .......... be ........... used .......... in ......... the" ............ unit
would include petroleum coke, other hydrocarbon streams and a number
of RCRA-listed hazardous wastes, including: API separator sludge
(K051), acid soluble oils (DO01_ an DO18 ) , primary sludges (FO37) and
.phenolic residue (K022) . Should the El Dorado store these materials'
on site .............. for ......... a ............. perTod" ....... of ......... greater " than ......... 9'0 ........ days', ................ the .............. f aci'ITty ......... would ...... be
required to obtain a "IC'RA storage permit. If the materials are not
stored at the facility for longer than 90 days, a storage permit would
not be required, as provided for under 40 CFR §262.34.
If you ......... have any further questions or require additional
inf ormat i on , .............. please' .............. contact ............. Step'neh '" "Bergman ........ of ........... my ......... itaff" ........ at ............ (2'0"2 )" " 2 60'-
5944. ' • . .
Sincerely,
-------
RCRA
2. Restaurant Waste and the
Household Waste Exclusion
(§261.4(bX1))
Are restaurant wastes excluded from
RCRA Subtitle C regulation as household
wastes per 40 CFR §26L4(bX!)?
Wastes produced by restaurants ate not
household wastes tad therefore win not be
excluded from RCRA hazardous waste
regulation. Ibe applicability of the household.
waste exclusion is based on two conditions:
the place of generation and the type of waste
generated. Household waste must be
generated on the premises of a temporary or
•»•»» y* ' ~. -
sidence and be comprised
primarily of materials generated by consumers
in their homes. Restaurants do not serve as
temporary or permanent residences for
individuals and therefore do not meet both of
the criteria for household waste and win not
qualify for the household waste exclusion (49
Efc 44978; November 13,1984). If however,
the restaurant is part of temporary or
permanent residrnrr. the waste generated
would qualify for the household waste
exclusion as it would be generated on the
premises of a temporary or permanent
residence and be comprised primarily of
materials generated by consumers in their
homes.
-------
ill iliiiiiii ii iiiiiiii inn 11 iiiiiii i i ii in iiiiiii iiiiiiii in i in 11 in inn in i i ii inn i i in inn nil i i in n inn 111 i iiiiiii in in i ii i i i
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
-------
RCRA
1. Solid Waste Determination for
Spilled Commercial Chemical
Products
According to 40 CFR §2612, Table 1,
hazardous commercial chemical products,
when recycled, are exempt from RCRA
because they are not solid wastes. If a
manufacturer spills a commercial chemical
product into the soil and intends to reclaim
the spill residue, is the spill residue exempt
from RCRA standards?
m
The intent to recycle a commercial
chemical product spill residue does not
exempt the material from RCRA jurisdiction.
In fact, EPA has stated that contaminated soils
and other cleanup residues generally are solid
wastes because of the difficulty associated ..
with recycling wastes contained within
environmental media (54 £R 48494;
November 22,1989). Sometimes, however, a
spill residue can be returned to a process or
otherwise put to use, and thus remain exempt
from RCRA standard*.
sthat a spill residue
is not a solid vwat, the generator has the
burden of proving that legitimate recycling
will take place. The Agency has adopted
objective considerations to evaluate a
generator's claim mat a spilled product will be
legitimately recycled. The length of time the
spill residue has existed is one such
consideration. In order to prove that
legitimate recycling will occur, a generator
may al$c> show that recycling has already
begun, the material is valuable, the material
can feasibly be recycled and/or the company
has recycled such material in the past (55 £E
22671; June 1,1990).
*
In the absence of strong, objective
indicators of recycling or intent to recycle a
spill residue, **the materials are solid wastes .
immediately upon being spilled because they
have been abandoned" (54 £R 48494;
November 22,1989), and must be managed in
accordance with all applicable RCRA
standards. '
-------
[[[ I
•((••III!! ijliliilillil ..... Illlita^^^ .i! 1C! ....... < •••iiillill ..... Mr Si ....... IK: lEllilllllih; ", illllll ......... • ' ikr1' ' t .Ml". U ....... "•lliiilin : Will •" ..it ". I: i > I >• i ...... ''Slill':1,'!'!!1 IV Hi illKIC'Uiii,;' ii • i, li'i!1!,;!!' : ..... Iii '"IliivHllili!;! ..... Ill >, '}: JIIIIIM^^ J>: ...... Ill', I1 liillili'll: k:ii'itKi».*[. ' 11 "! ..... IKllll l( I III IkiclihliL 1, Ullllll i >.llllillll!< ' • < !\IIW!!l|l|ll
illl'illH^^ KiW^^^^^^^ • < !' !'i , ;: IIIIIK^^^ ..... i;;i!H! ........ l' IilliM ........ : Illllll '.. 'Si •';: ...... S :'", ''iif ..... • C1: 'i; llMi,:1 « -111 f .i1 '• IS *•. i, j; 3, 9, >, ,. yf ..... i .yr < > i iiiiiiii ...... t.K s.-.|Wi»!v ..... lliliillaiir' -m ..... .«i,',Ttf "?..<>'t 3 ..... 'il.» "i • HIK I ill 1" mil ....... 11 M'llllll;' liililE' :*t ...... ilillll
•iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii mi ii i in i in in I
•II •lllliill I ili I li'l i ^Illlli ill i Illllll 11 ill ....... iilllll ........ llilllH ........ Ill 1 1 Illllll i i II HI 1 ............ Ill I n I III1 ill iiillill ..... ......... 1 1 III II 1 1 Hill II III I" I ..... Illllll III ..... ill ..... Illllll
i .......... ::™ .....
iiii iiiiii ' 1 1 1 1 P1 1 • i • ' ' 1)11 i,ii!i":> H t ;;;•». 'simf1^ " iiiiiiii i w :! i:t< i'i«i*'iiii& iiiiir ^tawiF ;:iSiii is. iri/'t -IK :x, « iiii: H a Mr.''f! y? Kr, a/ \ i ^uini i • , ''Tiusii ; ^^» i> i>' • ., LJ "iihi .HIM i • .|M|:J vs^ fi ' !!" K.. : ih '"' , «', ' Hii1: ' " ^ ji" ii ..... i" t:, f \ ninniiii :< /iiNii1 ..... ' ' - :, HIBI ..... i ..... Hi
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIH^^^^^^^^^^ n innnn ii iiiiii i nun in ..... in:! " 'iiiiii'j'ini; ......... lllll1lllll!:rl^;^Jlllllll•^^^^^^^^^^^ iii'iiiiuiiiiiiii „• liiii-i-j'ih'iiiifl ...... " '"ni,, iii i,!"n i i^n ......... : ..... it '"i .„'!,::, ,ii ..... i1""1 HI ..... !|i!!!!ll!i!l'l!S' I- I'll1 ,'!;!• !!!!!;* , '; I in1;1 ,!•' < * '!! T II1!": ' v '< ":f\ i"',1:!!!^1'1: '''iiii!!111} '|lll:iiiiii
-------
FILE COPY
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
JUK-51995 ' 9441.1995(21)
OFFICE OF
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
Mr. Steven O. Jenkins, Chief
RCRA Compliance Branch, Land Division
Alabama Department of Environmental
Management ' • '
P.O. Box 301463
Montgomery, AL 36130-1453
Dear Mr. Jenkins:
Thank you for your letter dated March 30, 1995 requesting
guidance from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on the
crushing of mercury-containing lamps. In your letter, you
.reference two documents from our Agency that appear to provide
conflicting guidance on the status of lamp crushing under RCRA
regulations. • .
The first document referenced is a letter dated July 28,
1993 from Jeffery Denit, Acting Director, Office of Solid Waste.
This letter clarifies that the crushing of fluorescent lamps, as
a necessary step of a legitimate recycling process, is exempt
under 40 CFR 261.6 (c), and therefore would not be subject to RCRA
Subtitle C regulatory requirements except as specified in 40 CFR
261.6(d). The letter further clarifies that the crushing
activities may occur at the generator's facility, or at the
recycler's facility and remain exempt under 40 CFR 261.6 (c) . The
Agency had considered an interpretation of 261.6(c) where the
recycling would have to take place at the same site as the
crushing, but determined that as long as recycling will occur, .it
does not have to be at the same site. Under this interpretation,
the person claiming the exemption (the generator) is responsible
for ensuring that the crushed bulbs do end up being recycled, not
just disposed of. This remains the current regulatory status of ••
lamp crushing activities that are a part of a legitimate
recycling process.
The second document referenced is the preamble to the July
27, 1994 proposed rule regarding management standards for
mercury-containing lamps. In this proposal, EPA requested
comment on whether generators or consolidation points should be
allowed to intentionally crush lamps to minimize volume for
storage or shipment and what, if any, standards should be imposed
to protect against mercury releases during crushing or the
subsequent management of crushed lamps. This section of the
-------
iiliiiiiiiniiiiiiiiiiiini in nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnniiiiininnini nnninnnnnnnnnninn iiii||liiiiiiiiiiiliiiilliiiiiiiiiiiii|liliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiliiiiiiiiiiiiilliiliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii niiiiiiiiililiiiinii in niiiiiiiiiiiinii in iinninn iiininn iiiiiiiiiiinnin nnnilnnnnnnnnnnnnniiinniliiiiini n nnnnniiiiiiininn nil 111 in iiinninn iiiinii in nun in inilinnlnn inn in in iiiiiiiiinn in in i in iiiiiiniiiniininn nn iiniiiinnili iiiiini nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnininiiiiiiniiininn nnnnnniiiiiiniiiiinnnn i nn innnnin iiiinnn iini||iilliinnn nil in in in in i n nnnnnnninn nnnnnninn in 11 niiiiiiiini n nun nun iiiiinnlnnn iiiiiiiiilinn nn
iiiiiii iiiiiiilii i in nnnnnnnnn innn niiiiiiiiiiiiiini in iiiniinn nlliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiini iiillinn in n iiiiiiiiiiiinni 111 niiiiiiliiiiiinn in innnnnnnn ninii nininiin iiiiiiiii nil iiiiiiniininn nn i inn nini i in i in in in MI in in in inn in iiinnnn iiiiiii niiiini in in muni iiiiiiiiiliiiiiini«« i n nn inniiiin|iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii i n ninninii in n i in 11 i n 111 iiiiiii inn in iiiiiiiinll i
preamble is requesting comment on appropriate management
Standards for mercury- containing lamps under the proposed
Universal Waste option. Management of lamps under the Universal
..................... Waste rule ......... would ........... provide streamlined requirements for persons
^____,__ ..................... _____^ng or collecting hazardous waste lamps. As
Such, many of the controls that are in place under the current
regulations for hazardous waste lamp management (e.g., tank and
cj|I|EajLn,e,r, ................ requirements under 40 CFR part 264 or notification '
j-aggU^^g^ejjts under 40 CFR part 264.11) may not be applicable
; under the Universal Waste rule. Therefore the request for
Comment on whether lamp crushing should be allowed and what
standards should .............. be ............... imposed .............. to ......... protect _ against mercury releases
m during crushing ............ reisers ........ to ............. such" ........... management under 'the'" proposed
Universal Waste scenario only.
At present , the Agency" is still considering the two options
presented in the proposed rule for spent fluorescent lamps and
has received over 300 comments on the proposed rule. Many of the
comments received, however, addressed technical concerns related
tp the risks involved in the handling and disposing of these
lamps (e.g., air emissions, leachability) . Because of these
cpncerns ~, the Agency will need to devote the proper resources to
apalyze and resolve these technical issues. The Agency notes
that in light of the resources needed to finalize a rulemaking
for ................. fluorescent ................ lamps and the President's initiative for
rg==^~— — ....... _.—_.» ............. t^e Agency is evaluating this rulemaking along
with a range of other projects in setting priorities for the
Office.
On May 11, 1995, the Agency promulgated the universal waste
riile (6Q |R 25432) • This final rule streamlines requirements for
generators, transporters, and interim storage facilities who
manage one or more of 1) hazardous waste batteries 2) certain
hazardous waste pesticides and 3) mercury containing thermostats
(as discussed above, fluorescent lamps are being considered
separately under the July 27, 1994 proposal) . The universal
waste rule also provides additional flexibility in that States
Cfn add additional wastes or waste categories to their own State
universal ................ waste .................. rules .............. if .......... they so choose. Therefore, a State may
_._._...___.___._._.... their State list of universal
wastes. In so doing, a State must decide what waste management
requirements are appropriate to be added to the universal waste
regulations that would protect human health and the environment
from risks posed by the waste during accumulation and transport .
Such waste management requirements may include volume reduction
incident ............ to ........... cQll,estipn, .............. activities .............. and .............. should, be designed to
eijsure ................ that ................. thege. ............... management practices do not dilute the
hazardous ................. constituents ............... or ............ release ............... them .............. to .............. the ......... .environment. After
researching and considering the issue, a state may decide that
crushing be allowed as appropriate management if the crushing
process was pe'rfofmed in a controlled unit which did not allow .
.any releases of mercury or other hazardous constituents to the
environment .
-------
ALABAMA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
•ft t> •' '': \« »
J ?i ".' -- V !, *?
XXW009W
Governor
Fob James , Or
January 31, 1995
«*«Hmg Address: '
•o BOX 301463 Mr. Michael Shapiro, Director
MONTGOMERY At Office of Solid Waste
wwo-1463 United States Environmental
Protection Agency
TsTSo^T Washington, D.C. 20460
MdcimoA Drive . .
Aontgontery, AL
41094608 Dear Mr. Shapiro:
The Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) has recently
received correspondence from the Monsanto Company, Anniston Plant,
requesting guidance on the regulatory status of crushing fluorescent lamps
(copy enclosed). Also, attached to this request was guidance dated July 28,
1993, from then Acting Director, Jeffery D. Denit, of your Office.
The July 28, 1993 guidance states, in part, a..Jfcrushing fluorescent lamps that
fail the toxicity characteristic is a necessary part of a legitimate recycling process it
^°2?/5S^S
-------
If you have further questions regarding how the recycling
and storage requirements apply to this situation or about the
mercury-containing lamps proposal, please contact Kr'istina Meso.n
B£ my staff at (202) 260-5736. Thank you for your interest in
the safe recycling of hazardous waste.
Michael Petruska, Chief
Regulatory Development
Branch
Hi IK in ii
1
i. i i1"1 ; ! Illslin ,ll a ,!';.. Hi •" li||l.|..||;ill!|.. .lliBlll".. I. ' i111,, jll,...;1« :"i, !« 21, ',1(1 ' >'i,.r .. i;;',,1;"1, ' .'.'I ' •. .'."III.! , fX •; nil;1 „' 'Wft i: ' •': U^l [.j ''t : .'I,. Ill, •' .,!„,;.
it*1 . - . iiiiiiiii, i11,1. r.1,:,.! • *"MN.: liiiifii i1;*,1' 1|;; *;;, '*• ,.lit. IT tic-. ll:,ii,;|1.- •'•' '.,*; "r ,<•::';. j",;1,: i. 'MS- i. 11- • ;i mf/'- <•.» ivji-i.> '-.i , .iii!"i. sfif
"in.met i: M:, :'. n i . iiriiji .a "6, M " :,; 1:11.1...,. ii|.|iii' ".i:1!1:."'.1
li",":1!1; . ' J ;,,;. ' .• .:.' >:'[ •• «.,.'. ''*; r. j «t: |.;ti .M1;!,:;,; „ iii|(.|.| IS.",,1! •; :. IIP J,
1 III II niiiiil
PIT win. i . "ii": i . i1" .ii1'.. .I., mi;
MIUIF; ' mil ' i ", ji ':in
-------
Page 2 .
January 31, 1995
Mr. Michael Shapiro
It would seem that, unlike the recycling exceptions provided for with lead-acid
batteries at 40 CFR Part 261.6, the intentional crushing of characteristically
hazardous fluorescent lamps to physically separate, reduce in volume, or make
them more amenable for transportation, storage, or recovery meets the basic
definition of treatment under 40 CFR Part 260.10.
The Department understands the need for establishing legitimate recycling
facilities for processing mercury-containing lamps as an alternative to disposal.
However, in order to be equitable to all recyclers of hazardous waste ADEM
does not believe that a less stringent "management system exists under the~^'
current Federal regulatory structure. At this time, ADEM is seeking -
icurrence from EPA on this issue in order to provide consistent guidanceto
generators and other fa«flfa'g« *h?t wish to eomm«nff 1 smp"crushing activities,
and which do not re^*"'™ mercury values as a final product. This is an
important regulatory issue and we would appreciate a response at. your earliest
' possible opportunity .
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr.
Michael B. Jones at (334) 271-7989.
* 4
Sincerely,
Steven O. J
RCRA Com;
Land Division
ce Branch
Enclosure
SOJ/MBJ/lmptrt-doc
Copy: Alan Farmer-EPA Region IV
Tommy Arthur- ADEM
Ron Shell- ADEM
File: EPA correspondence
-------
iiiiKii ii 1 iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiii i i ill I 1 inn inil
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
111 Ill" i I i ) lull InllllP
IIP II
ill 111 Illlll 111 11 ill i I 111 111 i
ill Ill Ilill i "I I 111 I Illlll
1 I II Illlll l| Illlll I I1
Illlll I1 III I HH
Mil iillliU I '111 r
111 I I I f.il VOi. v ", An"!,' 1',,B : >,t • .
ITS:.:, ',:,'ti|il.> ills 1 ••nut .• ,.;ii', "i> »j| i •'» i"; .-t' 'Mill ,, i. 1 ~ <•: V ;: i III!1" >^
-------
FILE COPY
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
w WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
JUN191935 9441.1995(22)
OF
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
Mr. James Mallory, Executive Director
Non-Ferrous Founders' Society
455 State Street
Suite 100
Des Plaines, Illinois 60016
Dear Mr. Mallory:
i ~ *« ™ «f Mav 4 1995 vou express your concern about EPA's March
providing a tangible environmental benefit.
Our March 8 letter reiterates and explains in detail our longstanding understanding of
indicates otherwise, we would be happy to receive it.
™«fed by conventional hazardous waste treatment and disposal such as groundwater
contamination, air releases and releases to surface water bodies.
-------
; In the past, the category of materials we call "spent materials" (e.g. sands that were
used and picked up contaminants) have caused environmental problems. The Agency sought
* jurisdiction over spent materials to be able to prevent recurring environmental problems, and
then to reduce regulatory burdens we allowed generators to recycle on-site under minimal
controls. The Agency outlined three environmental concerns specific to spent foundry sands
in our March § letter to AFS. EPA is aware of the possibility that current RCRA Subtitle C
jurisdiction over recycling activities may be overlybroad in some situations where recycling
operations incur costs of regulation without commensurate environmental gain.
Because of issues like this, EPA is currently in the process of looking at ways to
amend the definition of solid waste and hazardous waste recycling requirements in the future
to encourage environmentally sound recycling. A major issue we'll be looking at is how on-
site recycling should be ^regulated, If at alL We wfll'senous!^ consider options fet''would
' —— "
allow manufacajirerrto r^^cIe'tEeir ——g^y materials at their" own" sites witaoW'applying
RCRA jurisdiction. The Agency hoges to have a proposed rule completed by toe summer of
IW^lX^ffie^j^os^allropy of ouF Program p|~ which describes In s"Ome" &^\>uY'plans'
to reassess how we define "solid waste".
Also, EPA committed to working with the foundry industry and the Agency's
Regional office in Dallas has begun compliance outreach to assist foundries in understanding
their responsibilities under RCRA. We would welcome your Society's assistance hi that
effort^ ff yOu hive inyTfurtnHf questions ''regarding the tefimfiol'' oFsolid waste or hazaitiqus
waste recycling, please call Paul Borst of my staff at (202)
Sincerely,
Michael Shapiro, Director
'Office of Solid Waste
Enclosure
in (i in 11
-------
Mon-Ferrous Founders' Society
455 State Street • Suite 100 • Des Plaines, IL 60016 • (708) 299-0950
FAX (708) 299-3598
May 4, 1995
Mr. Michael H. Shapiro
Director of EPA Office of Solid Waste
401 M Street, S.W./5301 /
Washington, D.C. 20460
Dear Michael: «?
On behalf of the Non-Ferrous Founders' Society (NFFS) and its member foundries, I am
writing in response to your letter to the American Foundrymen's Society dated March 8,
1995.
On page three (3) of the correspondence, you state "fl]t appears that spent foundry-sands
are spent materials being reclaimed, and are therefore solid waste". This finding is not
consistent with existing EPA regulations. The finding is also inconsistent with EP A's own
efforts to redefine the term "solid waste" under the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) via its Definition of a Solid Waste Task Force.
Part of the problem is that the foundry industry's definition of reclamation is synonomous
with EPA's definition of recycling. It is this semantic conflict that is the premise of the
Region VI determination. The question of whether or not spent foundry sand is a spent
material is moot. Whether or not the subsequent physical or mechanical separation and
screening of return-sand constitutes a reclamation process is also a moot question. The.
shakeout process itself represents the first step in foundry sand being used beneficially by
the foundry. Thus, entering shakeout represents the first step in the reclamation process -
the point at which the product is removed, scrap metal is recovered, and the sand is
reclaimed by removing process materials. This conclusion is supported by the following
statement in your letter:
When the spent sand enters the shakeout process, they are reclaimed through
regeneration, which involves the removal of contaminants, including core sand
butts, fines, tramp metal and other dumps of sand too large to fit through the
screens. As a spent material being reclaim^. the spent foundry sand constitutes a
solid waste ... [h]owever, the fact remains that foundry sands are spent materials
being reclaimed from the moment that they are separated from the castings.
Since foundry sands "[a]re being reclaimed from the moment that they are separated from
the castings", all foundry sand materials exiting the shakeout process have been reclaimed.
Thus, foundry sand exiting the shakeout process would no longer fell under RCRA
jurisdiction per 40 CFR 261 .3(cX2)(i). In addition, because the mechanical process of
-
-------
screening and separating spent foundry-sand is a reclamation process, it is generally
exempt from reguTaBon under RCRA (40 CFR 261.6(cXl)).
The issue of whether foundry sand is a spent material being reclaimed in a shakeout
process is irrelevant. All materials resulting from the shakeout reclamation process (which
is exempt from RCRA regulation) would be exempt from RCRA per 40 CFR
^
According to EPA, onlythe'portion of sand which is not returned to the mold-making
process remains a solid and, in certain circumstances, a hazardous waste. In the most
practical sense, the reuse of foundry sand has become an integral part of the mold-making
process in modem foundries. These foundries incorporate a sand loop-return design, the
complex portion of a foundry where return sand is reused and mixed with new sand and
various binding agents to produce a casting mold. Thus, the process of sand reclamation
is an inseparable, integral and generally contiguous portion of the sand mold-making
process. The agency oaaSSufeA foundry sand entering shakeout represents the point at
which tie jproauct?55tJng^is captured for further processing and the sand is returned (via
the RCRA exempt reclamation system) to an ongoing production process Jmold making).
Clearly' foundry sands ire returned in in ongoing production process, making these
materials exempt from the definition of a solid waste.
| find it absolutely counter-intuitive to reason that spent foundry sands "have become part
of the waste disposal problem, are discarded and therefore can be solid waste under
RCRA." If foundry sands were intended to be discarded 'by foundry's at the shakeout
table, would not all materials be collected in a trash dumpster for disposal rather than
processed through, in some cases, elaborate systems for subsequent reuse in the ongoing
mold-production process? EPA provides no rational explanation or baas for why these
materials should be subject to the onerous requirements of RCRA management.
Finally your position in the March 8 letter regarding foundry sands illustrates wiry Mrs.
Browner's Common Sense Initiative should be implemented by the Office of Solid Waste.
EPA itself has recognized the need to encourage the recycling and reuse of industrial
materials. In fact, the Office of Solid Waste has established a task force to redefine the
term solid waste under RCRA and to provide recommendations that would result in more
industrial materials being recycled.
Your determination seems to take a counter-position to EPA policy, at a great expense to
the casting industry, without providing a tangible environmental benefit. -Naturally, this
matter is of grave concern to NFFS and its approximately 200 member-companies. I look
forward to your prompt response to the arguments presented here.
Sincerely yours,
lory
Executive Director
-------
Fl! F
IILL
iJiJt (
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460
JUN 22 1995 9441.1995(23)
OFFICE OF
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
Michael Roberts •
Maintenance Engineering
6436 San Diego Ln
Indianapolis, IN 46241 . *
- Dear Mr. Roberts:
Thank you for your letter of March 27, 1995, to the Office
of Solid Waste, requesting confirmation that your fluorescent
tubes are nonhazardous based on the data which you provided. EPA
regulations require persons generating solid wastes to determine
whether the solid waste is hazardous. 40 CFR 262.11.sets forth
' the generator's responsibility to determine whether his waste is
hazardous, including determining whether the waste exhibits one
or more of the characteristics identified in Subpart C of Part
261.
When a generator makes a hazardous waste determination using
~ the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure, EPA regulations
require that the generator use a "representative sample." A
"representative sample" is defined at 40 CFR 260.10 to mean a
• sample of a universe or whole (e.g., waste pile, lagoon,
groundwater) which can be expected to exhibit the average
properties of the universe or whole. After examining your sample
analysis data, it appears that you tested only one spent
fluorescent tube to conclude that all of your spent fluorescent
tubes generated on-site are nonhazardous. If our assumption is
correct, we believe that the data provided may not meet this
definition. Based on one tube, we have no way to assess the
variability between fluorescent lamps (new versus old, different
manufacturers, different wattages, etc.). A representative
" selection of lamps randomly chosen should be analyzed to make
this determination. I have enclosed chapter nine of SW-846,
' EPA's "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste." This chapter
gives guidance on how to develop a sampling plan to obtain a •
representative sample of wastes. •
Under Section 3006 of RCRA individual States can be
authorized to administer and enforce their owri hazardous waste
programs in lieu of the Federal program. Indiana is an
authorized State, therefore you should contact Mr. Dave Berry of
the Indiana DEM at (317) 232-4417 to discuss your request. Mr
Berry works in the Hazardous Waste Management Branch and is the
State contact person on spent fluorescent tubes issues. He may
-------
1
be able to assist you in developing an appropriate sampling
plan. Ollie Fordham is also available to discuss sampling. He
is in the Methods Section of EPA's Technical Assessment Branch at
(202) 260-4778.
I you may be interested to know that the Agency recently
p'r'omulgated the Universal Waste rule, May 11, 1995 (60 FR 25492),
-which facilitates the environmentally sound collection and
management of hazardous waste batteries, certain hazardous waste
p'esticides, and mercury-containing thermostats destined for
recycling or proper disposal. This rule.streamlines regulatory
requirements for generators, transporters, and interim storage
facilities that manage the aforementioned wastes. The universal
waste rule also provides additional flexibility in that Spates
can add other wastes such as spent fluorescent.tubes to their
State universal waste program, if they so choose. I have
enclosed a copy of the Universal Waste final rule. For further
information on the universal waste rule, contact Kristina Meson
at (202) 260-5736 or Bryan Groce at (202) 260-9550 of my staff.
' - " "s'ince'rel
Mike Petruska, Chief
Regulatory Development Branch
Enclosure(2)
ill ill 11
in IIP in u
niiii Pin
i in 11 in
-------
FiLt
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
JUN30 1995
9441.1995(24)
OFFICE OF
SOLID WASTE ANDEMERGENCY
RESPONSE
Mr. Douglas W. Crim
Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C.
1200 Campaul Square Plaza
P9 Monroe Avenue, N.W.
Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503
Dear Mr. Crim: •
In your June 2, 1995 letter to Paul Borst of my staff, you request EPA concurrence on
behalf of vo" client American Bumper and Manufacturing Company (Amencan Bumper) to
^econd^ mSri^Wch American Bumper intends to transport to Canada to a cop^r
^elt/ri^a solid waste and therefore exempt from regulation as a hazardous waste under the
S!oSce Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The secondary material you describe in your
wter is dried metal hydroxide solids in pellet powder form generated from treatment ot
wistewaters produced from electroplating of nickel and chrome bumpers. You state that you
JS^tta ttac materials are not solid wastes because they are used or reused directly without
prior reclamation per 40 CFR § 261.2(e).
Based on the description in your letter, the material that American Bumper wishes to
exnort Ss to m^et ^defimtion of F006 wastewater treatment sludges from electroplating
oSoLTli^SLardous waste. Assuming that the sludges are being sent to the copper
Ser Sr me*l recovery, they are solid wastes that are also hazardous vrastes£cause 4ey art
sludges that have been listed by EPA and are bemg sent for reclamation -40 CFR § ™?M£
The regulatory exclusions from the definition of solid waste you cite at 40 CFR § 261.2(e) are
not applicable because reclamation is occurring.
Although based on your description it appears these materials are a solid waste these
materials may be eligible for a variance from the definition of solid waste. Your letter indicates
reclaimed.
i s«e 40 CFR § 261 l(c)(5) defining use and reuse and limiting its applicability for use as-an
—;
26i.l(c)(5Kv.
-------
•Ill III 111 (111 Illlllllllllllllll 111 I III 111
Materials which have been reclaimed but must be reclaimed further may be eligible for
a variance which, if granted, would exclude them from the definition of solid waste. 40 CFR, §
260.30(c). This variance may be granted by an authorized State and relies on factors enumerated
1 at 40 CFR § 260.3 l(c). These factors include:
* the degree of processing the material has undergone and the degree of further processing
that is required;
• the value of the material after it has been reclaimed;
* the degree to which the reclaimed material is like an analogous raw material;
* the extent to which an end market for the reclaimed material is guaranteed;
I
• the extent to which a material is managed to minimize loss;
• other relevant factors. 40 CFR Section 260.3 l_(c) (These factors are discussed in greater
detail in the regulatory preamble at 50 FR at 655.)
To obtain more information about this variance, we recommend that you contact the
appropriate State regulatory agency to inquire if they have this variance in their regulations (many.
States adopt the Federal program essentially verbatim). Also, please be aware that States have!
the authority under Section 3009 of RCRA to regulate more stringently than the Federal program.
You should know that the EPA is currently undergoing two initiatives to help encourage
environmentally sound recycling. First, the Agency has ongoing activities related to the Common
Sense Initiative (CSI}_whidirelies on an industry-by-industry rather than a pollutant-by-pollutant
approach to environmental protection. One of the six sectors included in the CSI is metal
finishing. The Agency is currently working with representatives of the metal finishing industry
as well as States, environmental groups and other stakeholders to find ways to encourage more
recycling of wastes and other materials from metal finishing operations. We are currently hi the
process of developing a pilot project to assist the Agency evaluate the potential for some
materials previously classified as wastes to be considered commodities.
* Second, EPA is in the process of reevaluating the definition of solid waste to become
simpler, clearer and more relevant to RCRA's environmental goals. To this end, we have
developed a program plan (enclosed) to be used as the basis for developing a proposed rule hi
the fall of 1996. We envision developing a proposed rule that would exclude some materials
.destined for recycling from RCRA jurisdiction which more closely resemble normal
manufacturing than traditional waste management We also expect mat those materials which
remain wastes under RCRA jurisdiction would be subject to a more simplified, self-implementing
set of management standards to encourage recycling.
-------
We appreciate your interest in environmentally sound recycling. If you have any further
questions, please contact Paul Borst of my staff at (202) 260-6713.
Sincerely,
David Bussard, Director
Characterization and
Assessment Division
Enclosure
-------
I;
T, MftXBl (1»»*-1MO)
OfOMC L. CANBEjUp (tiM-liZi)
ltvv,JM PADOOCK ,,M9.,,361
HWIS D, STONE (1H2-1»4Ci
LAW OFFICES OF
MILLER, CANFIELD, PADDOCK AND STONE, P.L.C.
A PROFESSIONAL LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
1200 CAMPAU SQUARE PLAZA
99 MONROE AVENUE, N.W.
' GRANS RAPES, MICHIGAN 49503
DOUGLAS W. CUM
TELEPHONE (616) 454-8656
FAX (616) 776-6322
ANN AMOR. MICHIGAN
•4.0OMREU) HILLS. MICHIC
DETROIT, MICHIGAN
GRAND RAPIDS, M1CH|
KALAMAZOO, MICHIG
LANCING. MICHIGAN
MONROE. MICHIGAN
WASHINGTON. D.C.
AFFILIATED OFFICES:
PENSACOLA. FLORIDA
ST. PETERSBURG. FLORIDA
GDANSK. POLAND
WARSAW. POLAND
June 2, 1995
"j .......... "MrlPaulEorst
I .......... RCRA E^prc^ment Division
, ...... j ........... .U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
Washington, D.C. 20460
Re: Exemption of Secondary Materials from Regulations/
Notification to Export - American Bumper & Mfg. Co.
Dear Mr. Small:
American Bumper and Mfg. Company seeks the Environmental Protection Agency's
concurrence that the secondary material American Bumper intends to transport to Canada is
exempt from RCRA regulation. The secondary material is dried metal hydroxide solids in
pellet/powder form, generated from treatment of wastewaters produced from electroplating of
nickel and chrome automotive bumpers. These secondary materials will be transported to Inco
Limited, Copper Cliff Smelter, Copper Cliff, Ontario, Canada. The secondary materials will
not be treated, reclaimed or otherwise altered prior to its use in the Inco nickel process.
American Bumper has a contract with Inco whereby Inco purchases the secondary materials from
American [[[
................................. Unjier ........... 40 ............. CF1 .......... 2igl.2(e) the secondary materials are, not solid waste. Therefore,
American Bumper requests EPA's concurrence in a determination that the secondary material
-------
MILLER, CANFTELD, PADDOCK AND STONE, P.L.C.
-2-
If you have any questions in regard to the matters discussed in this letter or American
Bumper's Notice of Intent to Export, please call me at your earliest convenience.
Sincerely,
Dougfcs W. Crim
DWC/pdv
cc: Laura Shears
Craig Smith
GRFSl\109O»1.1\aB2Z7-OOC32
-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20450
AUG -3 1995
9441.1995(25)
OFFICE OF
1 SOLO WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
Michael W. Steinberg • .
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
1800 M Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20036 • - '. •
Dear Mr. Steinberg: ' •
This replies to an issue you raised in a July 7, 1995, letter
to Alan Carpien, U.S. EPA Office of General Counsel, on behalf of
your client, FMC Corporation, with respect to EPA's interpretation
of the Agency's carbamates listing rule promulgated on February 9,
1995. 60 Fed. Reg. 7824. ' •
This response specifically deals with issues regarding the
Agency's interpretation of the exemption in 40 CFR
261.3 (a) (2) (iv) (F), ,a new section of EPA's*regulations.added by the
carbamates listing rule. This new section provides an exemption
from the hazardous waste listing designated as K157, which
encompasses wastewaters from the production of carbamates and
carbamoyl oxitnes.
'The exemption provides that wastewaters »re not considered
hazardous waste if the maximum weekly usage of four constituents --
formaldehyde, methyl chloride, methylene chloride, and
triethylamine total -- divided by the weekly flow of process
wastewater (prior to any dilutions into the headworks of the
facility's wastewater treatment system) contains leas than 5 parts
per million by weight. Calculation of the maximum weekly .usage of
the four constituents includes "all amounts that can not be
demonstrated to be reacted in the process, destroyed through
treatment, or is recovered, i-fi., what is discharged or
volatilized." •
In your letter you object to EPA's inclusion of volatilized
solvents in the calculation of maximum weekly usage. You claim
that the rule unduly interposes RCRA regulations into the
production process, as opposed to the disposition of wastes..
-------
ofewS^ter^straTJ^o^1^11^^ thi8 Prc
or wastewater sto meet the exemption
_„_.._*
-------
triethylamine using quantitative analytical methods to
demonstrate the exemption requirements are met. However, the
Agency concludes that end-of-pipe analytical demonstrations
alone do not prove compliance with the exemption criteria.
All waste treatment emissions must be considered.
60 FR 7832. It was not the Agency's intent to preclude or require
direct analytical testing of the waste discharged. .As noted above
it was the Agency's intent that the mass reaching the environment
be accounted for, and that volatilization during storage not be
discounted. ' •
You also' inquire as to the relationship between the new
section 261.3(a)(2)(iv)(F) exemption and the exemption in section
261.3 (a) (2) (iv) (B) C"B exemption"] . The B exemption was issued in
1981, 46 Fed. Reg. 56582, and applies to wastes resulting from^the
use of solvents subject to the non - specif"! c sonrce, or "F, "
hazardous waste listings in 40 CFR §261.31, Thus, different
standards would apply. Should there be a case where multiple waste
codes apply, the Agency would view each in accordance with the
applicable exemption. In such a case, both exemptions would have^
to be met in order for the waste to be .exempt.
I hope this explanation deals adequately with your concerns on
the issues involved.. If you have further questions, please contact
John Austin at (202)* 2604789. ' •
sincerely'
David Bussard
Director • .
Characterizatidn and Assessment Division
-------
iiiiiiiiiK ii iiiiiii iiiiiii 1 in ill 111 (i I) 1111111111111111 nun iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii i ii in iiiiiii iiiiiiiiiii 111111 i in i i ill in i n i ill ii i nil in 11 mi
Ml I 111 IIIIIII 111 IIIIIII 111 111 11 III IIIIIII
.This Page Intentionally Left Blank
K!
iii HUH i
ill II I!
II1 ' I
ill II lull
iiiiiii 11 i
iii i i in
i i
11 (iiiiiii
-------
FILE COPY
USB
%«0^
\ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
| WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
AU8 4 1935
* 9441.1995(26)
OFFICE OF
. SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY
. RESPONSE
Ms. Orlean Thompson
Senior Environmental Scientist
Corporate Environmental Services
Health, Safety and Environment
Eastman Kodak Company •
Rochester, New York 14652-6279
Dear Ms. Thompson:
This is in response to your May 3rd letter to Stephen
Bergman of my staff. Both he and-Marilyn Goode found the tour •
that you arranged of the photographic processing facilities at
the National Geographic Society to be quite informative.
Based upon past conversations that we have had with you and
your attorneys, it appears .that it would be useful for me to
clarify our policy regarding the regulatory'status under the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of silver recovery
units used in photo processing.
A silver recovery unit used to treat photo, processing
wastewater that exhibits a characteristic is considered to be a
characteristic sludge (regardless of whether the sludge is
produced as a result of required wastewater treatment) and, as
such, is not subject to RCRA regulations when sent for
reclamation. A -characteristic sludge being reclaimed is not
considered a solid waste, according to the provisions of 40 CFR
§261.2(c) (3) .
Again, thank you for arranging for my staff to visit a
silver recovery operation and for your continued efforts to get
us the materials that we needed to make an informed
determination. If you have any further questions, please contact
Stephen Bergman at (202) 260-5944 or Marilyn Goode at (202) 260-
6299.
Sincerely,
Michael Petruska, Chief
Regulatory development Branch
-------
May 3,1995
, Stephen Bergman
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Solid Waste, MC-5304
401 M Street, N.W.
Washington D. C. 20460
Dear Mr. Bergman:
It was with great pleasure that we hosted the visit by you and Marilyn to the photographic
processing facilities at the olfices of the National Geographic Society on April 27,1995. Messrs.
Allnutt and Curry were especially gracious in displaying all of the different photographic processes
which as a matter of course led to the treatment of the used silver-rich fixer and other wastestreams
prior to discharge to the POTW. The technologies utilized in all cases were electrolytic recovery
and metallic replacement cartridges. . • •„
While the driving force of the entire facility was the acquisition of Ac finest quality images for
their customers, it was no doubt apparent that environmentally sound practices remained the
, | 1T7 underpinning of their operation. Again, the main c>bjective of our visit was to enable you to view
the nature of the photoprocessors* treatment of their waste streams to meet POTW limits, and the
ggnseguent recovery of silver. We hope that this visit has provided you with the background the
Agency needs to issue a definitive interpretation mat the silver recovery units are characteristic
sludges, which when reclaimed, are not solid wastes.
I have enclosed a draft copy of one of a series of documents being prepared for external publication
1' ^ ™ ;1iitWedi|||TJwiiiTeclmotogi of Silver Recovery for Phc^rocessors. ft very dearly explains the
''!:'!— chemical reactioas which occur in the processes used to recover silver. In the case of metallic
replacement, using metallic replacement cartridges or chemical recovery cartridges (CRC), a very
rapid oxidation-reduction reaction converts the silver thiosulfate of the used fixer solution to
,"" [ II elemental silver, while the iron of the steel wool is sohibilized and is discharged as a thiosulfate
complex.
iii'irii'yii iiiijiiiiiii'i1!1!11'lMniKiiini1 niiiin;
any fijrtilCT questions^ please do not hesitate to call me at 716-722-1004.
:™ ^iHliDs^yZ
Orlean I. Thompson, Ph. D.
Senior Environmental Scientist
cc; Marilyn Goode
Michael Petruska
'Corptrat* Emir onmertta! Service?
f . . * . e .'.- »-<"•",".'
Illllllllllllllll Illllillllllllllll
-------
FILE COPY
i&O ST*f.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
AU6 16 1995 , N
9441.1995(27)
OFFICE OF
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
Mr. J. M. Stoneburner
Environmental Compliance Coordinator
DuPont Medical Products
P.O. Box 6101
Newark, DE 19714-6101
Dear Mr. Stoneburner:
This is in response to your August 4th letter to Michael Shapiro
regarding a July 16, 1990 determination by EPA that used fixer _
generated as part of your photographic film developing process is a
spent material and therefore subject to the definition of solid waste ,
when being reclaimed. In your letter you request' EPA concurrence that
the used fixer is a "by-product" and therefore not subject to the
definition of solid waste when being reclaimed.
Haying reviewed the materials you sent to us, we continue to stand
by our 1990 determination that the used fixer is a spent material. I
have enclosed a recent letter to CPI Corporation that addresses a
situation similar to yours. I have also enclosed a copy of a March 24,
1994 memo from the Director of the Office of Solid Waste that provides
a detailed explanation of the definition of spent material.
I noted your concern that current classifications and regulations
are discouraging silver recovery. I would like to understand better
why that is, and what EPA might be able to do to address the issue,
because we are very interested. in removing barriers to environmentally
sound recycling. At this time, we. are actively working on^revisions to
the Definition of Solid Waste; the enclosed Program Plan gives an
overview of the project. We are also considering a request by the
Silver Coalition to remove silver from the TC.
If you would like to -discuss this in greater detail in person, we
would be happy to meet with you. To set up a meeting, please call
Stephen Bergman of my staff at (202) 260-5944.
Sincerely,
Michael P~etruska, Chief
Regulatory Development Branch
Enclosures
-------
l ^^
^^ "i" ")'i:"'i i iiiiiii :iiiun'i'i ?i;:: iiiiiii'i'
; • •iiiii i i: i' •'»': <„ an '"i: f "us •" jpm i. ; :» v imi;' HI ' t *' ao • i::, i-i • i: '*•;: .'.. ! »it "i «: iii ''IB'1 > i ' liiiiiiifiii d xr i, "y • "all • r "if'", f..1 T:I '"-:' (" ini'it" a I. 11n 11 I
I! llilivnilllillHIr'lll'lit'linlll • '! , IIIIIII ir vi III!1 .;' UTilllF ::»! liljiOlllillllll IlllilEljli IPKTU1:: >n, ' lilllln,1 ill I!"1" "I'llnlllll!,,, ":|'!!""i Ill I1"1'.',, «:.m» Illlln ,",i, :"1!'"'" U I "I 'III! ill'limi, I.H, I'll 'In " 'nil llUTilllllil1' im',1 • 'I!:, ' ,,,«l!ll .link !'•! vllil!
i! iiiiiiii -' "liiiiriiiJil"" f i".': Si."^ iii "iiii,Si',iiJ > 4iiiiS^^^^^' 'iiiiiii ; 'af\'i\;., lusHt "wiiitf x i ' • ii i, f «SS ,i"*~:iL i! • • p'. iii' ::: •' -i" 3i 'i • i i 'L in "•» *">S~ t: v,''""", ^ iriii
OuPom Medical Products
S'S. ISii •'* f!!!:'' "I1'"!;! ^il'j^jj r u \ Jx
ii in iiiiiii
111
i in
.,,
P.O.Box 610!
Newark, OE 19714-6101
DuPont Medical Products
in i
August 4,1995
i in r
Michael H. Shapiro, Director
Office of Solid Waste
U.S. Envirpnmentgl Protection Agency
......... ..... [[[
Washington, DC 20460
Dear Mr. Shapiro:
' ' "91Fi; i;' It ,,,i J1'!',, Jll
-------
Even though we did not agree with the original EPA classification, we have (with
difficulty) developed our market within the regulatory restrictions imposed by this
•spent material' classification. Unfortunately, these regulatory barriers are
limiting wide spread and rapid expansion of this environmentally friendly and
potentially cost effective approach to photographic processing. Many small
customers continue to discharge waste to the drain rather than selecting a
recycling option because they do not want to enter the hazardous waste
regulatory system. Also, many large companies do not select a recycling option
and continue to discharge to the drain because they do not want to move up
to large quantity generators. Common "sense says that the intention of the
regulations is to encourage recycling versus disposal. However, the spent
material' classification encourages (if not requires) disposal rather than
recycling.
In the attachments to this letter, we have discussed all of the relevant aspects of
this issue including the regulatory barriers, a detailed explanation of the
photographic process, the DuCare® recycling program, the generation of the
used fixer effluent stream, and our reasoning in support of a 'by-product
designation.
A-change from a 'spent material' to a 'by-product' classification can only have „
a positive affect on the environment. There is no negative. Currently, many
photo processing concerns remain outside the RCRA regulations by sending
their used fixer to POTWs. At worst, under a 'by-product' classification, they will
- continue to send used fixer to POTWs. At best, they will recycle -the fixer and
eliminate tons of effluent from the environment.
We feel that a re-examination of this issue is appropriate considering the
potential benefits to the environment. If you concur with our interpretation, tons
of effluent will be eliminated from the environment without complicated and
time-consuming paperwork as more printing companies select DuCare® as an
option.
I will contact you soon to request a meeting to discuss this issue.
Very truly yours.
J7
J. M. Stoneburner
Environmental Compliance Coordinator
Enclosures
-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
111 III I 111111 I I 111 III 111 I 111 1111 I III 1111 1111 II 111111 III 111 I 111 111 111 I I I I I III 1 -I1'111 :>'! .«?<:ft."UMii:.tMi.,!!HWI.'q4M!M.>ftll;^'MII IIHJ :iK*'r>iSIWv i'"t"'i
wfl^l
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
August 24, 1995 9441.1995(28)
Ann M. Dolan
Manager, Environmental. Health & Safety
Ansell Perry Inc.
1875 Harsh Avenue S.E.
P. O. Box 550
Massillon, Ohio 44648-0550
Dear Ms. Dolan:
I am writing in response to your letter of August 10, 1995 which requests an
interpretation of the recently effective Carbamate Listing Determination (60 FR 7824,
February 9. 1995) as it relates to the latex process wastes generated by your company.
From your letter, we understand that Ansell Perry, Inc. uses a dithiocarbamate
product (ethyl zimate) in the formulation of latex mixtures for the production of surgical and
specialty gloves as a reactant to vulcanize latex. You said you believed that your
manufacturing process wastes are not regulated under the carbamate final rule. You also
indicated that your company believed you do not meet the definition of a discarded
commercial chemical product because ethyl zimate is not the sole active ingredient in the
product. You suggested that the P and U waste codes do not refer to manufacturing process
wastes that contain these substances.
In response, I note that wastes to be identified as K161 are limited to the production
of dithiocarbamate acids and their salts. Ansell Perry Inc. is not a producer of wastes from
the production of dithiocarbamate chemicals, and, therefore, the wastes produced in your
process would not meet the K161 hazardous waste description.
Regarding your second point, any residue remaining in a container or in an inner liner
removed from a container that has held any commercial chemical product or manufacturing
chemical intermediate having the generic name listed in 40 CFR 261.33(e) or (f) is a
hazardous waste if and when such a residue is discarded or intended to be discarded, unless
the container is empty as defined in 40 CFR 261.7(b). Ethyl zimate is chemically
bis(diethylcarbamodithiato-S,S')-zinc (CASRN 14324-55-1) and is designated as U407 under
40 CFR 261.33 (f), effective August 9, 1995 (60 FR 7854). The Agency also understands
This document has been retyped from original
-------
that ethyl zimate is not the sole active ingredient in the formulation and is not the sole active
ingredient in the final product. Therefore, such latex process wastes would not be U407
because the ethyl zimate was used as a reactant and not as a sole active ingredient in the
formulation or in the final product i'
Thank you for your inquiry. If you have any further guestions, please contact John
'Austin at (202) 260-4789':
nun n ii iiiini in in ii i n
Sincerely,
David Bussard
Director
Characterization and Assessment Division
INlillM^^^
iEillliilXII,
11!!": iii] ',.' /c wi: i1 v'«i;i«: if». ;;
•:,wm" fill niiiH^ iiKiiKiiiEi .a|:• vim i .iti ''infn i;*:'. \")' t:1 'ii::1!;):1, •>
.tijllilli !> iiili iilitH^^^ ii'lhi!:! ' J, I'll, vllit tisiiik"! i .M'r"1!.; 'VSr :'.;•
..... e-yiisci. "t! a- ' j:i ....... ti ..... Ji'iiiui1 ii'i , •: .MICH t : stwnnymn. ;<:!<
: ,?•' •!• ...... i :::«ii«iE 'iiiiE:FJ!,a!a^^^^^^^ '< . IK: !> s D''iaaHBiNtiaiiBti:i,: ii
,1 I', 'lilli! ...... ' i't'lii ..... Eliih/^'lH^^^^ ..... li>'- Ml!)!1:'!' J™:vW^^ , ....... -H- ',
...... i ..... ' ji-i ..... .sio-'ii ....... R11 VIIIIIF ; iiiiiiiiiK s,: :M
........ :' '! , :<:•! ..... r> '; WK, 1 ...... Ilillli:1: ' Illllil: 'Hi'il ..... :;:i ..... Mill
This document has been retyped from original
in* „
-------
August 10, 1995
Mr. Michael H. Shapiro
Director, Office of Solid Waste • '
401 M Street SW
Washington, DC 20460
RE: RCRA Carbamate Final Rule
40 CFR Parts 261, 271 and 302 '
Dear Mr. Shapiro:
•Ansel! Perry, Inc. manufactures latex surgical and specialty gloves. We use
dithiocarbamates in formulating our latex mixtures. Ethyl zimate, a
dithiocarbamate, is used to control the vulcanization process. We believe that our
manufacturing process wastes are not regulated upon review of the Final Rule. We
request your interpretation as it relates to our specific waste streams.
Upon review of Per 40 CFR 261.33, we do not feel we meet the definition of a
discarded commercial chemical products, and off specification species. The use of
ethyl zimate in the compounding process chemically reacts to vulcanize latex.
Ethyl zimate is not the sole active ingredient in the formulation and is not the sole
active ingredient in the final product. Additionally, we interpret that the listed P&U
waste codes do not refer to manufacture process wastes that contain these
substances. .
We will manage the raw materials received at our facility as hazardous substances
defined by CERCLA and SARA guidelines and meet all reporting and spill
requirements.
* .
We look forward to your written response and interpretation of the application of
this final rule. Ansell Perry, Inc. is committed to ensure compliance with all RCRA
and environmental regulations. We appreciate the time and effort you and your
associates will extend to this request.
Respectfully submitted,
ANJ
Ann M. Dolan
Manager, Environmental,-Health & Safety
-------
II ill ill I 111 I I I ill I I 111 111 ill III! I HI
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Illllllllllllllll I 111 III Mill 111 III
iiiiiii ni nil iiiii|ii|iiiiiiiiiiiii ill in (i iiliiiiiiiiiiiiii iii i ill i ill iiiiiiiiii in 1111111111111111 i iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiia n in 11 iiiiiiiiiiiiii in in i 'in nil i i iiiiii n iiiiiii i i in i in n ill 11 nil ii nil in iiiiiiiiiiiiiii i iiii IP in 11 in i 1 iiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiii
-------
HOTLINE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
August 1995 9441.1995(29)
RCRA
1. Purpose and Applicability of
Speculative Accumulation
Provision
RCRA regulates secondary materials that
are defined as solid wastes when recycled.
Whether or not a given material meets the
definition of solid waste when recycled
depends primarily on how the material is
categorized (e.g., spent material, sludge,
commercial chemical product) and the means.^
of recycling (e.g.. burning for energy
recovery, reclamation, use or reuse). The
RCRA Subtitle C regulations also indicate that
materials which are "accumulated
speculatively" prior to recycling are solid
wastes (§2612(cX4)). What is the purpose of
this speculative accumulation provision? To
which materials does the provision apply?
EPA created the speculative accumulation
provision to mitigate the risk posed by
facilities that overaccumulate hazardous
secondary materials prior to recycling. The
provision serves as a safety net, preventing
recyclable materials that are not otherwise
regulated under RCRA from being stored
indefinitely and potentially causing
environmental damage. EPA subjects persons
who "accumulate speculatively" (i.e., persons
who fail to recycle a sufficient percentage of a
recyclable material during the calendar year or
fail to demonstrate that a feasible means of
recycling exists) to immediate regulation as
facilities.
waste gcnixaiors or storage
, 1985).
The speculative accumulation provision
generally applies to secondary materials thai
are not solid wastes when recycled
(§§26U(c)(8), 261.2(c)(4), and
261.2(e)(2)(iii)). In other words, certain
secondary materials that are otherwise
excluded from the definition of solid waste
become regulated as solid and hazardous
waste if accumulated speculatively. Among
the materials subject to this provision are:
• Materials that are not solid wastes when
recycled according to §261.2(s),
including materials used or reused in an
industrial process to make a product;
used or reused as effective substitutes for
commercial products; or returned to the
original process from which they are
generated, without first being reclaimed
• Materials mat are riot solid wastes when
reclaimed according to §261.2, Table I,
such as by-products and sludges which
exhibit a characteristic of hazardous
waste
• Materials identified under §261.4(a) as
exempt from the definition of solid
. waste when reclaimed, including pulping
' liquors that are reclaimed in a pulping
liquor recovery furnace and then reused
in the pulping process (§261.4(a)(6)) and
spent sulfuric acid used to produce
virgin sulfuric acid (§261.4{a)(7)).
the speculative accumulation provision
generally does not apply to materials that are
defined as solid waste Hwfaen recycled.
St»ecuteh««gimiiitoionisthm w* • fartc
-------
ijH IIP !i!H PBKFBPBHSIHHHIWUHPl IP "11 HIII llllll'lllillllllll lllllll IP ill iIII
in determining the regulatory status of spent
materials that are being reclaimed, secondary
materials burned for energy recovery, materials
used in a manner constituting disposal, or scrap
metal (50 £R 614,6351 Since EPA already
exerts the appropriate level of regulatory
control over these solid wastes, as provided
urider §26L6~and¥ari: 266, the safety net
provided by the speculative'accumulation
provision is not needed.
There are two exceptions to the rule that
speculative accumulation applies to all
materials that are not solid"wastes when
recycled and does not apply to materials that
are solid wastes when recycled. Commercial •
chemical products are not solid wastes' when
reclaimed (§261.2, Table 1), or when they are
manneTco^istilutingTilsposalf if that is
nominal manner of use (§§261-2(c)(l)(ii) and .
261.25^5(2))- Commercial chemical
products are not, however, subject to the
speculative accumulation provision. EPA has
not placed any time constraint on the
accumulation of commercial chemical products
prior to reclamation (50 £R 614,636). In
addition, precious metal-containing materials
; are defined as solid wastes when recycled but
are also subject to accumulation restrictions. If
accumulated speculatively .prior to
reclamation, precious metals become subject to
full RCRA regulation, rather than the reduced
Standards of Pan 266, Subpan F (§266.70(d)).
-------
FILE COPY
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
SEP 13 1395 • 9441.1995(30)
OFFICE OF
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
Ms. Patricia A. Tucker
€obe Enterprises
49 Essex Court
Meriden, CT 06450
Dear Ms. Tucker:
This is in response to your August 7, 1995 letter regarding IVO
International's desire to "import and sell a new chemical within the United
Stated " In your letter you asked us to clarify whether the chemical,
Potassium JexaSanocobalt (II)-Ferrate (II), once used as part of operations
at a Department of Energy nuclear plant or test site, and therefore
-spent", would be considered a "mixed waste" under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). •
We consider any mixture of RCRA-regulated hazardous waste and
radioactive materials to be a mixed waste. Unfortunately your letter does
not provide sufficient information for us to determine whether or not the
Spen? mlteriai would be hazardous as defined by RCRA, and therefore a mixed
waste.
A solid waste is considered hazardous if it is either listed or fails
one of the four "characteristics" (see 40 CFR Part 261, Subpart C), and
assuming it has not been otherwise excluded from the definition of
hazardoSs waste. In your letter you indicated that the spent chemical is
SSliSSd and does not fail the either the ignitability or corrosivity
characteristics. However, you did not adequately address the other two
characteristics, toxicity and reactivity.
According to 40 CFR §262.11, it is the responsibility of the waste
generator to determine whether or not a waste is hazardous. In order to do
this IVO international will need to determine whether or not the spent
material fSlISthS of the other chacteristics and is therefore hazardous
(and a mixed waste if radioactive) .
If you have further questions concerning mixed waste, please contact
Nancy Hunt at (703) 308-8762. If you have questions "||fd^4"|rd°US
waste characteristics, please contact John Austin at (202) 260-4789.
Sincerely, _
/
Michael Petruska, Chief
Regulatory Development Branch
-------
PATRICIA A. TUCKER
GOBE ENTERPRISES
49 ESSEX COURT
'(
,.,,TEL-C20S) 285 7636
TAX-(203) 2371655 ' - ,
August?, 1995
Office of Solid Waste
U.S.E.P.A. ;
401M Street, S\V
Washington, DC 20460
Dear Sirs:
I represent a Finnish company named IVO International. We are attempting to jmport and sell a
new chemical within the United States. We have been asked by some of our potential customers to clanly
your office's classification of this chemical, and we therefore respectfully request a written confirmation as
to your findings based on the data and questions presented below.
Chemical Name : Potassium Hexacyanocobalt(II) - Ferrate(II).
CAS Number: 12549-23-4
IglutalOiry: Decomposition at 250 deg. Celsius.
; Corrosiveness: Njm^rjpjiw solid i " '
Reactivity: Should not be heated wiih strong mineral acids (not normally found at
|fc , , ,,i,i, : ,;,., ,,- ,i ,,
lijllf illilllltl' Hi iikJiiiiijf' III' ii1' ; i' (•, Jjfjjjilj ft IIIIIP'1" '* [ ji!1 ttH!' '''I ''''I• fill! lllf llllllll!1 i-yiH!*™*»!||i "iiiiiBiiiiiiiiiiBiii'lii iminin" : ri*1 «i" MIK ^MK n' m,: mi:!1 ,i,i1: iiiihirtiiiiiipi'iiiniiPiiiiJiiip'ji,»if jjiiiiNi^iiiiniHi BIBI" r', iiiDiiiinniiii"ii nnniHiiinniPi, iiiiiiirti K, JPI Hiiiiiiiippiinii' i;1;!,'' < .i*1"',!1' i; j,: ' ,i MB iw, "j•" «,t, >:f PIP. '' iv L n i1' • •««<. • ,i "n • h, <»" i' .MI,,,.' IP >'"pi, ;ii 'iiiiiiiiiini
TOSCA Status: Currently preparing LVE orPMN.
,<' iiii' ' t >; ••) , i .11 ' I-/ it ;i' ii. - > 'ill ill ' iitiiiiiiiiii.! fiiiii!i:iiii, I ill ill. • J £ !~ ° _
, • i'B; ' '. .'iii i;..{ i' i.:.i,-., .1.1;, ; - LIT Typical Customers: Nuclear Power Plants and the U.SD.OE. .
'"^fV' -WfiV' tili;" 'iff 'MKiMiM r*iflBi' f'Bit r;-.*S '.&&• fi: «!*Pi»"!: "B1:"1' ''> '*; • -1': i«l i iiJp'^fia"1:. *W*^'' '""* • !:''*l»!l'!' ^ ":l ™:-- 't*^f:>" : '•" Wt •.. !'i'. .1 .i-T;a|l|! -f .: -s. ->iiii!|
,i" jn Liiiin. "i iiiiiiiiiiiiiii ,i ILI.IIIIIIIIIIL ii., ii|iiiiiiiHii ,: r ..ii.ni1'..; "ijr nu T 11" F .," .1.111 iiiiiiiiiiiii „'.;" iiiii.iiiiiiiiii. h .iju^ ""..;.. .111: iiiriLim111!' run11 K „ ..PI .. i". ..1111... n,: i in an i m ILL i1,,.. n1'. ir in L..I HE 1,1 '. n,' r,, inn, iiiiiin. ,j,; nr nun... niiin'i ;,i in: i, ..iiiiii? 'yiiiiii, in1.111 n'....' '..iii nnn 'iiiinir j, i1111,1 1|ii.i.;i;.:l .1:1111. # , ,. * .n1 inir, 1.11' i .1 ..:'... ji i :i:. i' limn mi nir in1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIKT .n luiiiiiii n. .nun
ilMil 1II1IP! lliJIKIi* illlllllli I|ini, < ' '\ V!A, !l : ' , "'iHU'!: ' 'fi ,'L I "
• ..... n* xa
,1
-------
Please confirm in writing, at your earliest convenience, that our understanding of your rules are
correct, and that your office would not' consider spent Potassium Hexacjanoo>balt(II)-Ferrate(II) a mixed
waste. We appreciate your time in attending to our request
Sincerely,
"
Patricia Tucker
-------
80/07/35 ll:4B 283 'B296
T>E VALLEY GF
111111 n 111 i i in mi 11 mi n in in i n n i i
PAGE 61
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
TY i=.CESIUM SELECTIVE ION EXCHANGER (ivo-CsTrtet)
SEcnoyi-
I T,
IVO1NTERNATIQNAL
HNNJSH NUCLEAR WASTE TECH.
m ETHAN ALLEN HIGHWAY
RIDQEFIELD, CT 06877
TECHNICAL^ EMERGENCY CONTACT
MR JUKKA RAUTAKALLIO
EMERGENCY PHONE NUMBER
(203)8941954
•| tiLEPHOwt, NUMBER FOR INFORMATION
-(203)8941954
DATA PREPARED
March?, 1995
1111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
III IIIIIIIIIII
i
1 111 11 1
II
1 F
i
i
i
i
•
i
i.
HEC'IION 11 - HAZARDOUS INt^WIHKN'IS / II1KVITIV INKORMATinN
INGREDIENT CAS NUMBER
POTASSIUM HEXACYANOCOfi ALT(0)-
FERRATE(II) 12549-23-4
II 111 1 111 111 111 Illlllllllllll IIIIIIIIIII HIM Illlll IIIIIII IIIIIII 1 1 III 1 11 1 1 II III 11 1 1 111 111 IIII IIIIIIIIIII IIIIIII 1 lllllllllllllll IIIII IIIIIIIIIII 1 1 1
inn iiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiii MI i in nil iiiii ii i n i i HI iiiii n i IN i IIP i iiiiiiiiiii ii iiiiiii iiiiiii iiiiiiiiiii iiii i UN iiii INI i i i ii in i n i
SECTION HI - PHYSICAL / CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS
BQUJNG POINT
DECOMPOSITION AT 250 d^C
VAPOR PRESSURE (ran Hg)
NONE
VAPORDENSTTY (AIR-1)
NONE
SOLUBILITY IN WATER
INSOLUBLE
Cy^*C^>rJn\r ^Jut^*» i" ijl jL
2.8
MELTING POINT
NONE
EVAPORATION RATE (BUTYL ACETATE
-1)
NONE
APPEARANCE AND ODOR
SOLID DARK BROWN/BLACK GRANULES
-------
88/87/95 11:46 283 8296
TVC VfiLLEV GF
INC
PAGE 62
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
IDENTITY - CESIUM SELECTIVE ION EXCHANGER (TVO-CrfTwil:)
TTIBF AND GKHjOSHTON HAZARD DATA
FLASHPOINT
NONE
SLAMMABLE LIMITS
NONE
EXTINGUISHING MEDIA
WATER, CHEMICAL FOAM, DRY CHEMICALS
SPECIAL FIRE FIGHTING PROCEDURES
NONE
UNUSUAL FIRE HAZARDS
NONE
SECTION V - KEACi'i VIIY DATA
STABILITY
STABLE
INCOMPATABUJTY (MATERIALS TO
AVOID)
HOT, CONCENTRATED MINERAL ACIDS
HAZARDOUS DECOMPOSITION OR
BYPRODUCTS
HYDROGEN CYANIDE MAY EVOLVE
(INCOMPATABEJTY)
HAXARDOUS POLYMERIZATION
NONE
CONDraONS TO AVOID
DO NOT HEAT WTTH STRONG MINERAL
ACIDS
CONDITIONS TO AVOID WLL NOT
OCCUR INNORMALOraRATION
-------
I IlllilV V
88/87/95 11:E VALLEV SF ' INC
PAGE 83
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
IDENTITY - CESIUM SELECTIVE ION EXCHANGER flVO-CrtiWt)
1
Hill III
n nil i nil
•111
iiini n i n u in nun i
,,i 'Hill I"!!,:,:',,™,1' ' ' "i< «!",l]lll' ^li|ii:^iilM^ iHIPIli i:il'i ''''iWl'Kiillll
IIIIIIIIIII ihill I illII
iillliiiH1' ; „•,' /i'" "ii!",;1!!!;1.1"!,! 'ii'ifi,,,,1 .fii'it 'iijI
SECTION VI - HEALTH HAZARD DATA
i ....... IP in
i iiiiiiiiiii in •• i in
I'lillili 1,11 1111 ........ ill ..... HI
i|iiiiiiiiiiiiiii
ROUTES OF ENTRY:
INHALATION? SKIN? INGESTiON?
POSSIBLE ADSQRPTIONNOTIJKELY POSSIBLE
HEALTH HAZARDS: HARMFUL IF SWALLOWED OR INHALED (DUST)
HARMFUL IF CONTACT WITH SKIN
INHALATION OR SKIN CONTACT MAY CAUSE IRRITATION
CARONOGENTTY: NOTKNOWN
SKINS AND SYMPTOMS OF EXPOSURE. IRRITATION AND DCHYDRATION (SKIN)
MEDICAL CONDITIONS GENERALLY AGGRAVATED BY EXPOSURE: NOT KNOWN
EMERGENCY AND FIRST AID PROCEDURES:
INHALATION - IF IRRITATION OCCURS, MOVE SUBJECT TO FRESH AIR
SKIN-WASH WITH WATER AND SOAP
IH^^^ . rial:! '!ii',ii;diiiii
Illlllllllilillilllli'lliilllll HI
•
III IIIIIIIH llNi iililllllllilliilii I il i
-riaccAirnoNS FOR SAFE HANDLING AND USE
STEPS TO BE TAKEN IF RELEAED OR SPILLED:
SWEEP UP AND WASH WITH WATER
WASTE DISPOSAL METHOD:
BURY IN APPROVED LANDFILL
PRECAUTIONS IN HANDLING AND STORAGE:
AVOID CONTACT WHILE HANDLING, STORE IN COOL, DARK AREA
OTHER PRECAUTIONS: DO NOT HEAT WITH STRONG MINERAL ACIDS
1111H 111 | •• 'U,!1 I
iB^^ £ii!i \mi\\n :<
iiiii iiiiiiiiiii i ii iiiiiiiigiiii m^m iiiH i "i iiiiiiiiiii 'ii < i till I
1 i, i i
: '• . • , , ,, .
..... /'Jl'If^S^^
1 '
iiw^^ ..... CiiiiijiK ....... •{, i1!11 ii(i.iitfi:H^^^^ <::MiiDiiii!iti:s ...... Li'fiLi ..... iiii
...... 1 1 ...... u ..... llllll•l'1l||fll^:vl!l^'l\!Hllll^>l!il;
-------
88/87/95 11M6 203 829B
THE VflLLEV 6F "" INC
PAGE 84
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
P*ft4(4)
IDENTITY - CESIUM SELECTIVE ION EXCHANGER (IVO-CsTrest)
SECTION vm - CONTROL MEASOBES
RESPIRATORY PROTECTION
DUST MASK
EYEHIQTECTION
NOT NORMALLY REQUIRED
PROTECTIVE GLOVES
RUBBER GLOVES
VENTILATION
LOCAL EXHAUST: NOT REQUIRED
OTHERPROTECTTVE CLOTHING AND
EQUIPMENT: NONE REQUIRED
WORK / HYCMEN1C PRACTICES:
WASH HANDS AFTER.HANDUNG
-------
ill IIIIIIIIB 111 111 iM i 11 ••III illilli Hi (I II l| 111 11 Illllll III Illllll
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
-------
FILE COPY
ISB.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
H 1995 9441.1995(31:
SCUD WASTE AND ='.'£-;=•. - '
RESPONSE
Mr. Patrick Wlodarczak
GNB Battery Technologies
14500 Nelson Avenue
P.O. Box 1567 . ...
City of Industry, CA 91749
Dear Mr. Wlodarczak:
This is in resoonse to your August 21, 1995 letter to David
Bussard concerning £he status of unused off-specification lead Plates
used in the production of lead-acid automotive batteries-. . In your
??tei? you asked for EPA concurrence that the plates are not regulatea
w soUd Taste under RCRA because (a) the plates are of f-specif ication
UmJiewialSImical products being reclaimed and (b) because the plates
are scrap metal being recycled.
' we concur with you on the first point Because the material you
describe is an off-specification commercial _ chemical Product being
reclaimed it is not subject to the definition of solid waste. We
lusher concur with your' reading of the April "'^f^ederal Register
(FR 50 14219). Although the material you describe is not a listed
commercial chemical product, the ^atus of non-listed commercial
chemical products is the same as those listed under 40 CFR 5261.33,
"that ?s,Pthey are not considered solid wastes when recycled except
when thJy are recycled in way.s that differ from their normal use" (FR
50 14219) - •-
This interpretation is accurate only if the materials you describe
are unused. If they have been used prior to recycling, they are
consSered spent materials being reclaimed and are therefore regulated
as solid waste under 40 CFR §261. 2 (c) (3) .
As for your second point, we are unable to concur with your
asse-tion that the lead plates used in the production of lead-acid
SalterieS meet the definition of scrap metal and are for that reason
exempt from the definition of solid waste when recycled.
If you have any additional questions, please contact Stephen
Bergman of my staff at (202) 260-5944.
Sincerely,
.
Michael Petruska, Chief
Regulatory Development Branch
-------
^
GNB
Mf;| 'ill;1!!!,!: ,111,4 iiiHiir ,
i**!:1 ::'? 1!!F''' fll"1"1'1''!''1 :"i!!i'; !: "I1!* ";L:"!' *! B ATTERY TECHNOLOGIES
illlHI'/lkl1 ' ,I,i 11 Jill1 ' " Illlllllkiil1:1,''!:f Ii,; ,,i! i'*i,r."i. 1,1 il.hii'iSiDIIIIIIIIII, " ' lilllllili"1, II f"' i«l'illl, ,'iil,,n|r J • , :'I''*!!1 ,'i"*ln,, III"!! , I '!'i!''»i" ,!, ' jjllih l,,i i
< |: ''."'[jjufci" "fiiillLili'll Hi!!']!!!! ,'fl" i ' itPI'1'!1" i 'lilililli ,1U Millf', "|il;,.n","T",,''ii,'ili'illfi,1 ,'lll '" .1,,','! 'ill: 'I'll'",ill ,„ "'V ::i,,'ii i iJni1 '!, " li!",iiii.!'1.. Mf:i "'7\\\f 11,* "illillW1 ''HI:',;,.,. '.niiiniUi ;,,,i U •illli'Pf!" ;: '<<>'< ', Injun, ill'li |,:,,,!i',i"",' '!.
l|l|l| I 111 II 111 111 I ill I I _ I III M III i ! II11 IK | |l|||| li IP i II I 11 :,, ; !! <':::;"liil"! 'I'lL!; iShf ,. jl. >>-vil
Re: Status Of Recycled. Unused. Off-Specification Batten' Plates
III I III II lilllllili III I I I I III I I III I 1111 I I II II I I >, .JI , ,!:'«; ;'• ;,:,}§,•• " "; ;<»
Dear Mr. Bussard:
i , ,'! |ir ,t ' ' .'liiijiiij jt1!,,!' i1 ',:'", :•,
! ' "'i i, !i 11' '«'"'"IF i jiiliiii! i iii'iiiii'1"'',1!, , ''i,N • iip
I am writing this letter on behalf of GNB Technologies, Inc. ("GNB") to seek your
confirmation of our position on the management of unused, off-specification lead batten1 plates.
The GNB facility in the City of Industry, California makes lead plates which it uses in the
manufacture of lead-acid automotive batteries. The lead plates are manufactured from lead ingots
that are melted and formed into strips. The strips are expanded into a mesh and the mesh is coated
with lead oxide paste. Occasionally, the plates are found to be off-specification because they
becorrie bent or misshaped in handling and are returned to GNB's nearby recycling facility for
resmelu'ng into ingots. For the reasons presented below, we believe that the unused, off-
specification lead plates are not classified as RCRA hazardous wastes due to their status as
recycled, non-listed commercial chemical products and recycled scrap metal.
•ifii n i n i ii n i iniiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiini i iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiini i ii mill i in in i n in n 11 i i i i i in i i ii n in n i ii n n linn in
Non-Listed Commercial Chemical Products
The unused, off-specification battery plates may be considered non-listed
commercial products not subject to RCRA. Commercial chemical products listed in 40 CFR §
261.33 are not solid wastes when they are recycled by being reclaimed or when they are
accumulated speculatively before recycling by reclamation. See 40 CFR § 261.2., Table 1. Non-
listed commercial chemical products also qualify- for this exclusion. The April 11, 1985 Federal
Register (50 Fed. Reg. 14219) preamble states:
Although we did not directly address the non-listed commercial CXB BiUtt.n Tcv.hnoU>i.
chemical.products in the rules, their status would be the same as Automotive Batten DU
those listed in § 261.3 3. That is. thev are not considered solid wastes 14 Ncl*>n •* <••
r.O,Bo\ 15o7
" i City. otjn4v!Mr.V,,,C|
' I' s A'
-------
Mr. David Bussard. Director
August 21. 1995
Page 2
when recycled except when they are recycled in ways that differ
from their normal manner of use. This is the same relationship that
exists between discarded commercial chemical products that are
listed in § 261.33 and those that exhibit a characteristic of hazardous
waste. We believe this point is implicit in the rules, as it is implicit
in existing §§ 261.3 and 261.33.
This position is reiterated in the March 1990 RCRA/Superfiind Industry Assistance and Emergency
Planning and Community Right-to-Know Information Hotline Report that indicates that unused,
off-specification printed circuit boards, when recycled, may be considered as listed commercial
chemical products for the purposes of Table 1 in 40 CFR § 262.1. These circuit boards are much
more heterogenous than battery plates. Further discussion of the regulatory status of recycled non-
listed commercial chemical products also can be found in a February 23, 1993 letter from Ms.
Sylvia Lowrance, U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste to Mr. KG. Kaul, New York State Department
of Environmental Conservation. This letter makes it clear that the Agency interpretation of
commercial chemical products includes materials that might not normally be considered as
chemical products:
Presently the Agency interprets "non-listed commercial chemical
products" under RCRA to include all types of unused commercial
products that exhibit a characteristic of hazardous waste, whether or
not these products would commonly be considered chemicals (e.g.,
unused circuit boards, batteries, etc.).
The unused, off-specification battery plates are unused commercial products and meet the
definition of non-listed commercial chemical product
Scrap Metal
In addition and alternatively, the unused, off-specification plates mat meet the
federal definition of scrap metal currently are excluded from federal hazardous waste classification
if recycled. 40 CFR § 261.6(a)(e)(ii) The federal definition of "scrap metal" is found in 40 CFR
§261.1(c)(6).
"Scrap metal" is bits and pieces of metal parts (&&, bars, turnings,
rods, sheets, wire) or metal pieces that may be combined together
with bolts or soldering (e.g. radiators, scrap automobiles, railroad
box cards), which when worn or superfluous can be recycled.
-------
Mr. David Bussard, Director
August 21,1995
PageS
': fei! | HI II
III II 111 I
interpretation of this decision is provided by the January 4, 1985 preamble.
•ill ii IK i n 11 I i 11 i n i 11 in inn nil i 1111°
^^
Put another way, scrap metal is defined as products made of metal that
become worn out (or are off-specification) and are recycled to recover their
":"' me3'content,' OT'metal'pieces'"tfiat are generated from machinery operations
i iHllllilll! "iiJl'llllliEiiill! B'l! ISfelii '.iillinilil'ii llJI'FiiailBK :i!lliii|iiiili|lllllllii'' a lilic !i« li ni'tililE &• ». , „ ° * f
(i.e., turnings, stampings, etc.) which are recycled to recover metal.
"'Sit
. 614,624 (Jan. 5,1985)
jii!1! i'liiilfil; ! I
..... if ...... \>,im;'4 ...... . ...... iKsmiiii ..... HI: "i. Scrap metal has been further defined hi at least one U.S. EPA document to include
; ! I3i i iijjjf ' i;!"ii ' !! I-:
-------
Mr. David Bussard, Director
August 21, 1995
Page 4 ,
weight ratio than pot dumps4), lead foil from x-ray packaging5, and zinc bar, nickel plate,
cadmium plate and steel scrap removed from spent alkaline batteries , have also been classified by
the U.S. EPA as scrap metal.
Under federal law, scrap metal that exhibits a characteristic of hazardous waste
currently is exempt from regulation as federal hazardous waste only if it is recycled. Sss 40 CFR
261.6(a)(3)(iv) and 50 Fed. Reg. at 624 (Jan. 4, 1985). If a scrap metal is not recycled or if it is
used in a manner constituting disposal, used for energy recovery or as a fuel, or accumulated
speculatively, it is subject to the full range of federal hazardous waste regulations. Sse Table 1 in
40 CFR § 261 .2. The unused, off-specification battery plates manufactured by GNB are not used in
a manner constituting disposal, accumulated speculatively, or used 'for energy recovery. They are
simply returned directly to the original smelter for resmelting. '
We believe that the unused, off-specification battery plates that are resmelted are not
regulated as RCPA hazardous waste because they may be classified as recycled non-listed
commercial chemical products and recycled scrap metal. Please let us know if our interpretation of
the pertinent federal regulations is correct. We understand that the status of the material under
federal regulation may differ from state regulations. We look forward to your reply. If you have
any questions about this matter, please call me at 818-937-2521 or, our attorney, Mr. Kelly
McTigue at 213-623-2322.
Sincerely,
Patrick Wlodarczak
GNB Incorporated
4 A large surface area to weight ratio indicates a somewhat higher potential for leaching of
hazardous constituents. The examples of types of materials that are excluded form the definition of
scrap metal (drosses, slags, and sludges) have fairly high surface areas.
5 April 29,1995 letter from Ms. Sylvia K. Lowrance, U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste to Mr.
William Roger Truitt of Piper and Marbury. .
6 October 29, 1986 letter from Mr. Matt Strauss, U.S. EPA Waste Identification Branch to
Mr. J. Mark Morford of Stoel, Rives, Boley, Fraser, and Wyse.'
-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
II II III I llllllllll Illllllll
111 111 Illllllll
llllillllllillllllilV
11(11 111 II
II Illllll I ill i Hi| Hill
ill Iiil
I
ill II
ii i mil iiil i ill
Hipliji.;::
i>t»!!J»'jCT!*i J|K
FiliililiiTr^ • ililllH^ ''Illlllll II i I ll'lhB1!!'1'
iriiiii^ p?ifii8jfj|fp«:?_?is:i..\^iip,if",!ji ^..yippp^^i.gff.ji'
'IK
JIBB: i ijiiii > .i* .HIawiihwiiBi*1* ir ,«> ,« <;:f i:11" •MKMWJL>I : iviw * ;»: ." ma MtiiMti'.rf'i>i . " r^i'MX, * •' i: IMF ' '>!i HIZUIK:: ' 1111: •'' '''M'Vi
IIIFilK i HIMiini:! iil|ii;lll!'" I'ljll'jiill LilSl;^^^^ :"-(l'h Hi) II .•• .' :illlFH^^^^^^^^ " iiFllliiilli'l'ii MIIH^^^^ j"! >> Illllilillltli1 '"IllUk. 'lill. U .1', SiHT'H^'L :
.:^^^^^^^^^^^^ ......
...... til ..... iiii'ii ..... iifliss,;]: "•
't9':i1^.i•:^I•• i ';yTfilfl :d!M^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ fSMi
I, jilililiiiilliiillilllllilli1 I:;, nil'1'!!:!:!1 i,","'! li.J!' ," iu:' 'Jili'lilllliliili11 J.; ll'li I « , !|!|i!< «lllll " I'l ™ 111,II illllllllillll1 "il'Jilllli'ih:' 'tlllliHi:! il'l"!' •Hi "•IIIIIHI
:;;!!!!'';''I!1!!!'Is!:I!"1!!*ll™!li*l!i !* i'i'" ii!:'i ,1s' 111!!!!!!11*!!i!i'*|j|j!»*!; 1^ I1 J 1:;l:!!llW^
j iiiiiniinpviw^^^^^^^^^ :,!! KI,,;iiiiI'.in1!",,,,:11".hj11:,1: ;i:"" faninii^^^^^^^^^ ^ ''iDiiiinii,KIIO ,^in nnn' itni'Cn! 'aril1 ;i ,ivm-D ni n:: "iiiiiiii
-------
. .
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20450 .....
'SEP I 5. 1995.
9441.1995(32)
OFFCEOF
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
Mr. Peter C. Wright . • . . . ' •-.-.'
Jfonsanto Company ••.'.•• . • '
•800 N Lindbergh Boulevard - . • '
• St. Louis, Missouri 6316? . . . ; .' . ^ _
•Dear Mr. Wright, • _. _ •• ;. •• ' ; ' V. ' . ; . . . ..'' '. ' ... .'.:'•
'• / •- I 'am -writing 'in response to your;. letter "of .January. 3," -1995 ;• ••.
in which you requested clarification -of the RCRA "contained- in" .
.policy. In your letter you' asked several -specif ic 'questions
regarding this policy, and we offer our responses below. It .
should be understood that these responses '-reflect the 'Agency's
•current 'interpretation of the contained- in, concept; '.in the •
Hazardous Waste Identification Rule for Contaminated Media (HWIR-
media) , currently under development, we 'will be looking closely
at the contained- in policy and other issues associated with •
contaminated media and will be. addressing those issues through
the ' rulemaking process .
Question 1. Can a State determine whether or not soils which
.contained a listed hazardous waste, but were then treated to
below health based concentrations, no longer contain the
hazardous waste?
The contained- in policy is intended to clarify the
application of RCRA hazardous waste regulations to environmental
media. As stated in previous guidance on this policy,
contaminated media are not considered solid wastes in the sense
of being abandoned, recycled, or inherently waste -like as those
terms are defined in RCRA regulations. However, environmental
media that contain listed hazardous wastes must be managed as
hazardous wastes because- -and only as long as— they contain
listed waste (s)1. EPA Regions and authorized states may apply
the contained-in policy to determine site-, media- and
contaminant -specific levels, such that if the concentration of
the hazardous constituents in the environmental media fall below
these levels, the environmental media may be determined to no
longer contain hazardous waste. Such "contained-in
determinations" may be made before or after treatment of the
contaminated environmental media and may include consideration of
site-specific exposure pathways (e.g., potential for human
exposure, soil permeability, depth to groundwater) .
1 June 19, 1989 letter from Jonathan Cannon, Acting Assistant Administrator of
EPA'B Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response to Thomas Jorling, Commissioner
of the New York Department of Environmental Conservation.
-------
Question 2. Are soils that have been treated and then
' ' '-- = i '•"'•-'determined not to contain hazardous wastes still subject to the
Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Universal Treatment Standards
(UTS) prior to land disposal? ,
lllilIllllililIIIIllIM
illllllllillllll illlllilllllllll
Yes. If contaminated environmental media are treated and
determined to no longer contain hazardous .waste, the LDR
^treatment standards still must be complied with prior to land
disposal. This means that the media would have to be treated to
ineefc UTS or a treatability variance would have to be obtained2.
Individuals who believe that the UTS are not appropriate for
jnedia containing solid waste are encouraged to work with their
State regulatory agency and the appropriate EPA Regional Office
to obtain a site-fspecif ic treatability variance .under 40 CFR
§268.44 (h), ... EPA's policy is that sate specific .treatability
variancef arja presumed' to be appropriate for contaminated media.
Se.e''~55~ FR 87(50 ' (fjarcg g~ 1990 ) For more information on site .
specific treatability variances granted in the context of
environmental cleanup, please refer.to the Superfund LDR Guides
Numbered 6A and 6B, entitled, Obtaining- a Soil and Debris
Treatability Variance for Remedial Actions and Obtaining a Solid
knd Debris Treatability Variance Jfor Removal Actions,
respectively. For your convenience, copies of these guidance
.ocuments are
111 llll I IIIlllll|i(lli IllllH
iliiillliill 11 nil I mini
I'(111 l|iillHiili|iill
i111 111 111 III III In III IT IK 'llllllllH1
in n i mi 11 mi n n 111 in n 111 n i in n 1 in nil 11 n 11 in'i n in n in n
II ml in
ill i
Iliiillliill
llll11 111 Illlllilllllllll 111
IB
IIIH^^
g
llll Ill
llll 111
Of course, if-no land "disposal" will.'occur",' the LDR treatment'
IllSjdards do not apply. Additionally, contaminated environmental
Tjnedia determined not to contain any waste (i.e., it's just
me,dj.aj, would not be. subject to. any RCRA Subtitle C requirement,
including the LDRs.
Illlllilllllllll IIIIIII III I^mitl IIIIIIIH IlllllllillV III IIIIIIIIIII llll 11111' IIIIIIIIIII Illlllllllliiiilllll 1 i'111 (I i llll llliiliii"ll|lil"lliillii 1 I'll III I'll II ill i MI iliiillliill IIIIIIIIIII illlllilllllllll llilllA^ Ii liillil Illlllilllllllll I" 11 illililii li'iil'li'illlii ll'lilillll illll'l "i 'i
| * ii in i mi ling in i mi i n ii|iiiiiiri in i i i i n iini i i n i in n ii
j - Question 3. If groundwater that originally exhibited a '
hazardous characteristic is subsequently treated to below a '
State-determined contained-in level, would the. ground'water still
be subject to the UTS requirements prior to land disposal?
Yes, Once the LDR .treatment standards attach to
characteristic wastes, even if the characteristic is eliminated,
the media remain subject to any applicable LDR treatment
standards that have not been met through removal of the
* Nothing in this letter is intended to affect the status of existing
regulatory or statutory exclusions to the definition of solid or hazardous waste.
Such provisions can prevent the duty to comply with LDRs from attaching in the first
instance. See, e.g. RCRA S 1004(27) (exempting industrial point source discharges
subject to Clean Water Act permits from the definition of solid waste). in
addition, the .Agency does. not intend in this letter to. expand the scope of
activities that constitute land disposal and thus trigger LDR treatment
requirements. For example, the Agency's positions that in situ treatment- and
movement of contaminated media within an area of contamination do not constitute
land disposal remain unaffected. Similarly, this letter is not intended to affect
any statutory or regulatory exclusions to the requirement to comply with 'LDRs (see
.e...q..':"' RCRA § 3020(b)).
-------
characteristic. As indicated in the Third Third decision.
Chemical Waste Management v. U.S. EPA, 976 F.2d 2 (D.C. Cir. .
19!*)? cert! SeMed 1135 S.Ct 1961 .(1993) ,. elimination of the
Iharactfrliticdo^ not necessarily SatisfyVLDR requirements. If
groundwater that exhibits ^ .characteristic is-.treatedpr^or to .
?*mri disnosal it -must be treated in. accordance -with applicable
'iDR treatment standards or pursuant.to a treatability variance to
meet 35requirements. . As .discussed .in- our response td ..question-•-
^individuals who believe that the UT| are not. appropriate to
their contaminated media are encouraged to apply for a site
Specific treatabil;ity-variance. _ •
' '-of course, .if no land disposal will occur, the-LDR treatment
•standards do -not apply-- Additionally, ground water managed in • ,.-
Accordance with one of the existing statutory or -regulatory . .
-exclusSns may not-be -object to^the LDR treatment standards, even
when land disposal will -occur. For example, under RCRA §
;SSS(b?? contaminated groundwater. may be treated in J^*^.
with a cleanup action and then rejected into the aquifer trom
which it wS withdrawn"without" meeting LDR treatment standards,
provided the treatment substantially reduces the hazardous .
-SoSSiJuents - prior to reinjection and the cleanup action will
7upon completion, be sufficient to protect human health and the
"environment.
Question 4. May a State that is authorized only for the
base RCRA program make contained-in determinations, or does the
.-State need to be authorized for the LDRs as well?
In order to make contained-in determinations, a State must
only be authorized for the part of the base program under which
-Se waste of concern is identified as hazardous. For example,
when determining whether or not a medium contains a particular
characteristic waste, the State must be futho5"!dj°£ *hat
characteristic. In the same manner, ^the Sta*e "i?h** J®
determine whether or not a medium contains a particular listed
- wls?™ ?Lt State must be authorized for that particular waste
listing In regard to the two.sites described in your letter,
bSSSss.chu.elts and Texas are authorized .for the base Program
under -which the wastes you mentioned are identified as hazardous,
and may, at their discretion, make the contained-in
. determinations you described.
Question 5. Do contained-in determinations n««ded to be
made under a RCRA permit, or can another mechanism be used?
Authorized states and EPA regions may use any format or
mechanism to document contained-in determinations. *hese
mechanisms could include official agency correspondence, orders,
and RCRA permits.
' • We hope this will be of assistance to you in applying the
-------
contained-in policy. If you have any further questions, please
.: conta^t Elizabeth McManus^ of my staff,-at (703) 308-8657. . In
ad^^^ ______ --££e £kat authorized states have their own
regulations and policies which may be more stringent than federal
regulations and policies. In authorized states, questions about
application of the contained-in policy, including the
| Interpretations put .forth in -this -letter, should be referred to
th£appropriate state agency. In Texas, please contact Paul
^was P.I t&e TjjxaiLNatural Resources Conservation Commission at
(512) 239-2340; in Massachusetts, please contact John Carrigan of
the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection at (617)
1292-5584. : . • • •
< • . Michael Shapiro
[' 'Director, Office of Solid Waste .
Enclosure
cc: Matt Hale, OSW, PSPD
• David Bussard, OSW, CAD
Jim Berlow, OSW, WMD
Larry Starjieldit OGC
Dawn RessTer", OGC '
Barbara Pace, OGC
Bruce Diamond, OECA, OSRE '
US EPA Regional RCRA Branch Chiefs, Regions I - X
John Carrigan, State of Massachusetts
Susan Ferguson, State of Texas
I
-------
Monsanto
. WMCHT ,
. ATTOWCY
(314) 694-8509
Monsanto Company
800 N. Lindbergh Boulevard
St. Louis/Missouri 63167
Phone: (314)694-1000
-LAW DEPARTMENT
January 3, 1995
•Mr.' Michael Shapiro '.' .. :
United States Environmental Protection Agency
' and
Washington, D.C. 20460
Re: Clarification of tht
Dear Mr. Shapiro:
//e
and response is requested in der to
has bean developed in concert tth
1
°" lmmecliate attention
remediation
of the operation of the conane in rue Mor^0"/',^0"83™0'8 un«erstanding
environmental media will likely contain trarlT J hhazai\dous wastc- T"e treated
~°
B r
on the land without eqard to the Und9"
Standards (UTS). Do you concu% wl
the base program is empowered ,o ^
regard to the State's au^orizaC ss
p a"d the media may "• !*«*««
eSt"Cti°n5 Universal Treatment
* St8te authorii!ed for
-------
Overview of the Sites and Remediation Protects
I I i'liil!'::,!!!'. Mill
111 111!Ill
first, plant site is'located in Everett, Massachusetts, just north of the City of
Boston. This long time chemical manufacturing facility was closed in November,
?992. Currently,.the Everett site has been proceeding under the authority of the .
Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) with proposed'femediation.scheduled for
completion in. 1997. In order for the .Everett site to proceed on .its cleanup
Schedule, the Agency's interpretation of the contained in'rule'is.important, .
particularly as the site is currently under a Purchase arid Sale Agreement for,
•development as a Shopping center with construction scheduled to begin in 1997.
This development is critical to the local community because the shopping center
will be a major element of Everett's tax base and a significant source of •'••'. ...
Employment in the city. • '' . • ' '•'. • "'•••- ;\ . . .-''•
Due to historic manufacturing operations, areas of the plant site'have been
Contaminated with bis 2-ethyI hexyl phthalate (BEHP), naphthalene and phthalic
anhydride still bottoms, materials which carry the RCRA hazardous waste codes
U028, U165 and K024, respectively. Concentrations as high as 10,000 mg/kg of
^EHP, 30,000 mg/kg of naphthalene, and 60,000 mg/kg of phthalic acid have
been detected in soil samples collected at the site. The remediation plan that has
•under development would involve the separation of some discreet waste
materials, treatment of some soil in place, and excavation and treatment of some
soil from hotspot areas with subsequent reuse of the treated soil on-site as backfill.
These treatment methods would significantly reduce the concentration of
hazardous constituents remaining in the soils. The Everett Plant has held
discussions with the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection
(DEP's) Bureau of Waste Prevention regarding the impact of RCRA regulations on
the planned remediation strategy and has assumed that once the soil was
remediated to meet health-based cpncentrations levels established by
Massachusetts (a RCRA authorized state), that the soil no longer would contain
hazardous waste and could be beneficially reused as backfill on-site with no further
RCRA restrictions. The planned remediation strategy would satisfy the
Massachusetts Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup Program requirements to achieve a •
Permanent Solution, addressing potential risks to human health' and the
envlronmenf anS eliminate trie pofenfiil for constituent migration. Attached is a
copy of a DEP policy memorandum dated March 4, 1994 and a letter issued on the
same date describing DEP's understanding of how it will apply the contained in rule
to a particular remediation project.
The other Monsanto site is the Chocolate Bayou pjant, located near iAJvin,iiTexas.
This'js a targe diversified chemicai m^iruifacturing site that has a RCRA 'permit,
which includes a corrective action component that is administered by the Texas
Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC). Texas is authorized for
.RCRA corrective action. The particular remediation project at issue, a program to
pump, treat and reinject groundwater that has been contaminated by benzene,
phenol and acetone, is not being conducted under RCRA permit, but rather these
-------
actions are being undertaken proactively by Monsanto in consultation with the
TNRCC. The plant applied for and has received a groundwater class V reinjection
permit from TNRCC for this remedial project. .
The groundwater at the point it is brought out of the ground is characteristically
hazardous for benzene. The groundwater exhibited measured levels of benzene,
-phenol and acetone as high as 62 mg/l, 6 mg/l and 6 mg/l, respectively without
: any treatment. The air stripping treatment system to be installed has been
designed to treat the groundwater so that the concentrations of benzene, phenol .
and acetone are no higher than 0.001 mg/l, 6 mg/l, and 2.mg/l respectively. this
treatment of groundwater to these levels would mean that all three contaminants
: would be below the Texas Risk Reduction.Rule Standard 2 Residential levels of .-:,
0.005 mg/l benzene, 21.9 mg/l phenol and 2.65 .mg/l acetone. .The phenol and the
acetone would, exceed the technology [mcineration] based. UTS waste water
standards of 0.039 mg/l for phenol.and 0.28 mg/l fbracetone. The phenol and
the acetone are biodegradable organic chemicals and it is believed that the
reinjection process will add oxygen to the affected groundwater,.assisting in the
biodegradation of the organic materials that are not removed by the treatment.
Neither site has considered applying for a. Corrective Action Management Unit
(CAMU). First, it was believed to be unnecessary to employ a CAMU because of
the plan to treat contaminated media to meet health based levels. Second, the
time, expense and effort on behalf of Monsanto and the state agencies to put in
place the necessary RCRA permits and modifications makes the CAMU option not
practical for a timely commencement of remediation activities.
History of the Contained In Rule
Monsanto's understanding has been that treating affected environmental media to
meet health based concentration levels that have been applied on a site specific
basis by the respective authorized states would free the treated media from further
RCRA regulation, including the application of any land disposal restrictions.
Monsanto's understanding is based on EPA discussions of the contained in rule.
Monsanto's understanding of EPA's position on the "contained in rule" is that it
was an interpretative rule long before it was "codified" in rulemakings in the
1990s. EPA has stated that this view of the contained in rule was supported by
the 1989 Chemical Waste Management decision. Chemical Waste Management
v. EPA. 869 F.2d 1526, 1538 ftnt. 15 {D.C. Cir. 1989).
The contained in rule was first explained in a memorandum from Marcia Williams
to Patrick Tobin dated November 13, 1986 . That memorandum stated that "if
groundwater is treated such that it no longer contains a hazardous waste, the
groundwater would no longer be subject to regulation under Subtitle C of RCRA."
-------
Subsequent memoranda and letters1 expanded on'the application of the contained
in rule.. These writings refined the concept that if contaminated environmentaJ
media was treated so that the levels of hazardous constituents that remained after
treatment wefe>"'Serow certain levels",' which often have Been set at"he'ajth based
levels, that EPA would consider that the affected media no longer "contained" a
'hazardous waste and so no longer was subject to regulation under RCRA Subtitle
C. Monsanto is not certain that the contained in rule applies to a situation like
what exists at the Chocolate Bayou plant where there are no listed, but only
characteristic wastes involved.' Yet Monsanto can see no reason why an exit level
appropriate for media contaminated with listed waste would not also apply to
media contaminated with a characteristic-waste. • - -. • •
, EPA also made it clear that an authorized RCRA state could determine what the :
f^ont::|nejjn ......... levels ......... c&yjd .......... be; ....... EPA guidance to the states in making the. contained .
..... ;;jp determjnalfgns .......... has ......... stressed the need to make the contained in determination oh
'
..... by means ..... of a ......... site specifc risk assessment. It would appear that the ' .. ',•
"?19. ......... CMP 40-OQ (tne Massachusetts Contingency Plan )
..... ....... '
the associated policy on the contained in rule and the TNRCC's Risk Reduction
Rules provide precisely the kind of the decision making framework EPA requires
that an authorized RCRA state use for making the contained in rule decision. It is
only a requirement for a state to be authorized for the basic RCRA program to be
"""" able to make contained in determination, and it is not necessary for the state to be
authorized for all or parts of the land disposal program.
"The rulemakings "codifying" the contained in rule began with the reference in the
Third Third rulemaking in which EPA "clarified" the treatment standards that would
apply to soils that had been contaminated with listed waste. 53 Fed. Reg.
31 ...... 142 (August .......... 17, .......... 1 988). ................. The contained in rule has been addressed in at
......... "" ...... ......... ' '
.......... ...... ........... .......... .......... .................
(fist ........ five ......... 0"tfie"r ...... "Federal ......... Register ' notices'. 2 The most involved discussion and
greatest reliance on the contained in rule is found in the Contaminated Debris
rulemaking. In the proposed rulemaking, EPA stated that debris which had been
contaminated with hazardous waste would "no longer be a prohibited waste or a
'h'Izirdous ........ waste ........ If ........ it ........ a"c"n"je-v-e"s" ........ j^ye'Isi ......... which ........ debris ......... no ........ tonjjjer ........ 'cbntaTnV ..... hizairdbus
vVaste." 57 Fed. Reg, at 982. EPA further explained that the levels would be that
at which the potential threat to human health and the environment had been
1 See e.g.. Sylvia K. Lowrance to Jeff Zeikinson, January 24, 1989; Jonathan Cannon to
Thomas Jorling, June 19, 1989 (authorized states can make determination on what the appropriate
health based levels are at which media no longer "contains" a hazardous waste); Sylvia K.
Lowrance to John Ely, March 20, 1991 (recommended that the state use a risk assessment
approach to making contained in determinations) [The Massachusetts letter cites additional letters].
2See e~.o.. 56 Fed. Reo. 24456 (May 11, 1991); 57 Fed. Reo. 958, 961 (January 9,
1992); 57 Fed. Reo. 37194 (August 18. 19921: 58 Fed. Reo. 48092. 48096 (September 14.
1993) and 59 Fed. Reo. 47982, 47986 (September 19, 1994).
-------
minimized. isL at 985. In the final rulemakin$, EPA explained that treated
. contaminated debris would be considered to no longer "contain" a hazardous
waste if the debris were treated so as to achieve health based concentrations ;
based 'on considerations of site hydrology and exposure pathways. .EPA
summarized the regulatory effect of providing treatment to these levels by stating
that "Idlebris found not to contain hazardous waste (and not exhibiting a
hazardous waste characteristic) would not be subject to further Subtitle C
regulation, and so could be land disposed without further treatment." 57
at 37226 (emphasis added). ' .
the contained in rule has also been discussed in context of the rulemaking .
proposing land disposal restriction standards for soil and in the final UTS
rulemaking. EPA. stated "the primary function of a contained in determination has
been to determine specific constituent concentrations at which the.media ?t a
specific site no longer 'contained' hazardous waste and thus would no longer be
subject to the management standards for hazardous waste." 58 Fed. fleq. at
48127. EPA's discussion of the contained in rule and its relationship to the
concept of minimized threat levels in these rulemakings is unclear to us. Yet it
appears to us that a contained in determination 'based on a site specific
determination satisfies any requirement to achieve minimized threat levels. If this
is not EPA's position, then EPA has made a major change in policy for which no
notice has been given, for which no rationale has been provided and which may
mean that the work on the HWIR will be a complete waste of time. More to the
point if this interpretation about the affect of the contained in rule has changed it
may bring to a halt the two remedial projects referenced above and undoubtedly
countless other projects.
In order to avoid delay and unnecessary additional expense in connection with
approving bids from remediation contractors, we request a prompt response.
Monsanto would also like an opportunity to meet with the Agency at the Agency s
convenience during January to address the matters raised in this letter.
We look forward to the Agency's urgent consideration and response on this
important matter. .
Very truly yours,
Peter C. Wright
-------
*
cc: Barbara Pace, Esguire, EPA Office of .Genejal^Counse.1
, SteveirDlfivTrnTan",' Esquire" EPA "
Richard Kinch, EPA • ,. .
. " . Mr. Thomas Powers, Acting Commissioner
III lilllll 1111 ill i Iiii i| i Hill »m I J UJi i 1 **
• Mr. John Carngan . . ...
Mill Id 111 Ill I llll I IliIlN . - .1 . .. ' :
Tr ' L Mr. Brian Moran . • •
Commonwealth of Massachusetts .
' ' Department of Environmental Protection" i • -\
... , .* One \yjrvter street' [ '. ' • " _ '" " _ ""
... Boston, Massachusetts 02108
:lf: lt „ ' *; Mr. Ritihard Chaplin' ...•;•:•. _ •:' ' '.'.'.' • .' ' -.: " . .
• " Common wealth of Massachusetts '.''."
•J - ''Department of Environmental Protection ;, .
• • . < y 10 Commerce Way . -.. . ...
1 , . Woburn, Massachusetts 01801
* i ' '
Mr. Douglas Crist •
| Mr,., Tom Jj|£hj|
;: Ms. Wendy Ruzacky _ . . .
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission
P.O. Box, 1,3082 ', ,]' .', ,.,' ', :,
Austin, Texas 78711-3087
Lowell Martin, Esquire, RCRA Corrective Action Project
iiiiii i
iiii i i in
1 Iti
ill I 11 1 Illllll
-------
FILE COPY
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
S WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
OCT191995 9441.1995(33)
OFFICE Of
SOUD WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
James A. Lively
The TDJ Group, Inc.
760-K Industrial Drive
Gary, Illinois 60013
Dear Mr. Lively: .
This letter is written to clarify a point regarding the
applicability of RCRA to a foundry manufacturing duct system, as
discussed in your August 4, 1995 letter summarizing our July 26,
1995 phone conversation. As stated in your letter and in our
conversation, site-specific determinations of RCRA applicability
are made by the appropriate State regulatory agency.
As you state in your letter, it is correct that, in general,
a material is not considered a solid waste until it is collected
in a baghouse or electrostatic precipitator. However, for point
of clarification, I should note that this assumes that the
material in question (e.g., baghouse dust) results from a
production unit, i.e., that the baghouse dust is derived from
materials that are not themselves wastes. In such a situation,
determining the applicability of RCRA would generally be made
when the material is removed from the baghouse. However, should
the material in the baghouse result from the treatment or other
management of a material already determined to be a solid waste,
the question of RCRA applicability to the particulate matter will
have already been determined because the particulate matter is
derived from a solid/hazardous waste and the duct system is, in
effect, a part of a waste management process.
Therefore, to correctly ascertain the applicability of RCRA
to the process of injecting a chemical additive in a foundry duct
system, it is important to know the regulatory status of the
materials going into the duct system. While such a distinction
has little impact in manufacturing duct systems in general, it
may be an important distinction in specific cases. Again, I
strongly encourage you to seek a site-specific determination from
the State regulatory agency or appropriate EPA Regional office.
-------
i it if',
JThank you for your interest in making the appropriate
regulatory determinations under RCRA. Should you have any.
questions concerning this response, please feel free to contact
beat (202) 260-8551.
Sincerely,
Mitch Kidwell
Environmental Protection
Specialist
Generator and Recycling Branch
1 ";,"! !!,„,!'"', I!!'1'1!!,!', !'""!;!!"'
-------
08-04-1995 04:01PM FROM THE TDJ GROLF, INC TO I2S322S03355T
THE TDJ GROUP, INC.
760-K INDUSTRIAL DRIVE • GARY, ILLINOIS 60013 • 708-639-1113 • FAX: 208-639-0499
August 4, 1995
Mitch Kidwell .
OS EPA OSW, Regulatory Development Division (5304)
401 M Street Southwest
Washington, D.C. 20460 ;
Dear Mr. Kidwell:
I am writing this letter- in response to our phone conversation pn
the morning of July 26, 1995. First I would like to thank you '
for your cooperation in discussing the sometimes confusing issue
involving the point of generation of a waste in a foundry
manufacturing duet system; your input is greatly appreciated.
Secondly, I would like to take* this opportunity to confirm some
of the information that we discussed so that we are clear.that
the information was not misinterpreted and will not be
misrepresented in our future discussions with state agencies.
'Dpfront, you were quite clear that appropriate state regulatory
bodies should be making their own decisions but that you would be
willing to assist them in this capacity if they so desired.
In our discussion, I asked where is the point of generation of a
waste in a foundry duct system. Your response was that
appropriate state authorities generally do not classify a \
material as a waste urtfcll it is collected in a baghouse or
electrostatic precipitator. Further, I inquired .about the process
of injecting a chemical additive downstream from a gas '.
conditioning tower (cooling tower), but upstream from a baghouse
collector. Your opinion was that state authorities might
consider the addition of chemical reagents immediately proceeding
cooling towers as 'an action that would not constitute treatment:
subject to RCRA permit requirements as long as no vents or exit:
faeries were present in the system downstream from the cooling
tower.
. If we do not receive a response, we will assume that the
information contained herein is correct. If you feel any of the
above was incorrectly interpreted during our conversation, please
contact us for clarification. Thank you.
•
Sincerely,
>#*
A. Lively
-------
III! III III 111 III 111
•llllllll Illllll 111 III II
111 IIIIIIII III I Illllll Illllll I Illllll ill
•! ' •• ' - ' 'ii- ""' """':' S I'll''! ::i:>!W^^ aii'll'F"If'IH^^^ il iiitllH^^
llllllllEUilljIILIi, « JK1IPII 'illiilHI', ,f nil' IIIIIIII I «!!'!,, i, I ' UK .lllli,, "I'll ,1!, 1 Hy II Alllllllill Ill" I"!, "III!1 at,r,,,!: !f
•
IIIIIIIK^^ 4W(Wi?lflmiW VMtlt i'SlBMifWrH¥JMlH;ir«aW1Wia»»BIR.:!iraLl II rcJHn.'iCffl Jillll"!"! I'l'UIil • "i ill! H*nM* lillliill II'!1:] I1!'!!1',' Illllll''i'lH^^^ illlllll fSliliiill;
IIK^^ IM'A*.::fll»^itifiraHfEI«l1liJiffl 'i!^^^ SIIM^^^^^^ ftV'HsLMrMlWMnitlft;
•itru ;!!rni!!;f!i!:;!:i ' liprEWiHiiipfKiKHiLjaf y«
knEUOlTOdlUl 9§SS •gmj^ "« = ii=«^^^^^^^^^^^
&& •' ' JL VL • ^kJL*':::::::::l:1:;:/:::::;:"^^^^^ :::::::=^ 'IL1:::!
•lit:; :i, •... iiiBin" iiiiitt^^^^^^^^^^^^ iiiii'!1'; it";' -"itsinfK- . "'iiM-ffa i itiii'iiii'ii'iiifif "ji'ii: f. K .iiii'iiiiio ti;1 ."ii:,!;'!'' •§ 1*1^Wi( ;li ''ij-iiiii 'i' 'i'ii:,:!>i':: ii'n 'tiK'<::,iii! >; ';' iiiiii*' EliH^ aiS^^^^^^ *::K^ , Sii> iii'iiiS^^^^^^^^^^^ iiiiiiiiii I
ILVilllb I1, Hi ,!,: i!i!!iili Ii 1 Jlllllillh'lill lllillKlllllll1!'1',! III:,:!1!1,! , Ulllil!1 'I'l'lli* jiihlllilllllllllillH i |i Ii "uJli, ii'lJIIIILiiJiliiril'illlUILIillll'lilililll/ll''''!;!!!'!,!'! BJIIHI'll I'liliilllP11 "iilMiiWIUrii'11!!' "I'illHIBI11 ii ill'IIIIIPin I1 "illll'llll111:1 Jiik'l JP1, 'ill, 'II! i "L'Tlllllillllllll'i1"1!:*1111', Hil'iiJ'!" 'I, J1"!,!, P L ' li: IPniniliiilli' I'lliniiiilniiliillj, liiililiilNIIIPiir'''!!!!1.'!!,,;; iiiiiT'Sii'H'i'iillllh,'111 i ' IIIIIIIII1P1!11 .ii.JlllllllllllllllllPJllC, Jiill'iililllllllillllllllliillliilllPillllJiilllllllillllllll^ <'' \'W\Vi,
lilllli1'1,! H!i|i | '", illillnllllBil , Hiiiiii llini'liiilli'lUI: ' ', limllili!!!,',! jiiil!»', g^iill'iiilWiiBii,,,!^:"1 Ifl.J'l iii'T'illlJlTUlIll!:;;,!!.!..,!!1'! I'/'iP''^'!''.'!.!!^'!!^'!!!!!!!!:.!1!.!!!!: ,:l'!"ai '. I11"":,1"'!1' ".JPP'liln" ,! I',:'1*! "< IL'HI '' "I1*! PPhiimii, "I!;,!. .Mlili, gum1 ,< 'lll;||i1111 , •'-1|| HI, "IllllllllCiillllliriiii'''™:!'.''!'!!'!!!*;:!!!!1,;i ,:l,ii::l"l
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
NOV 27 1995
9441.1995(34)
'OFFICE OF
SOLD WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
Ms. Karen E. Koster
Cytec Industries Inc.
West Paterson, NJ 07424
Dear Ms. Koster:
I am writing in response to your letter of October 6, 1995, in
which you request that EPA provide an interpretation of the
applicability of the recently promulgated K156 hazardous waste
listing determination (60 FR 7825, February 9., 1995) to waste from
the production of methyl carbamate at your Willow Island, West
Virginia, plant. .
In the February 9, 1995 final rule, the EPA listed as
hazardous waste number K156 — organic waste (including heavy ends,
still bottoms, light ends, spent solvents, filtrates, and
decantates) from the production of carbamates and carbamoyl oximes.-
A "carbamate" is a salt or ester of carbamic acid and methyl
carbamate is the simplest ester of carbamic ester. Therefore,
organic wastes from the production of methyl carbamate would be
subject to regulation as K156. . . .
While your methyl carbamate wastes may not contain the
specific toxic contaminants for which K156 was listed, organic
wastes from the production of carbamate chemicals do meet the K156
listing description and must be managed as hazardous wastes.
RCRA provides any individual facility a means for obtaining an
exemption from its hazardous waste management requirements via a
delisting program. See 40 CFR 260.22. The authority to approve or
deny delisting petitions has recently been transferred to the EPA
Regional Administrators. If you are interested in pursuing a
delisting, you may contact Mr. David Friedman of EPA Region III
Philadelphia, PA at (215) 597-2863 for information about how to
apply. You may wish to seek a delisting should you believe your
wastes would qualify for such an exemption. •
In addition, the EPA Administrator recently signed a proposed
regulation called the Hazardous Waste Identification Rule . (HWIR) ,
which provides another route by which listed wastes can exit the
RCRA hazardous waste management system. This proposal will appear
in an upcoming issue of the Federal Register. HWIR, if finalized,
will allow listed waste to exit Subtitle C if the waste's
-------
!' llllllllU , . I ', '.III: ii,'ll',l V
'111 I I II I
111 IIP I I II I I
•Illllll III II
constituents meet specific concentration-based exemption levels.
Promulgation of HWIR is currently scheduled for late in 1996 or
1997.
If you have further questions, please contact John Austin at
I (202) 260-4789. "•
Sincerely yours,
'JC\^
f°
ichael}Shapiro, Director
Office 6f Solid Waste
j
i IS
-------
Volume 5
Addendum
Place the attached
documents at the end
of the appropriate
Category Number in
Volume 5
-------
Illllllll Illllllll I lllllll
iiin iiiiiiiinii • ,|. ,i';iiii'!',iii'!;i 'i" i nuii'iiji , iii i '< < ninniL; .in; ,„ w1 \ ppppipp11; i* \ PI t IEIEJIL ' .HIIIIIIIIIIII •:; i,,' i1 „ •',„' i1 • > a; is • •, •» in ?!1 ym v \ -\,, HI ' • • „»;:: r • n* • ?A \: niniiPip "i ::i ii!',» "•»• r' i",' ^f, r n, „•:, n eif w •, JIB iimi ani1 i,;i m ai iii'BBiiiiiiiiiini!11 im, i>n ni ^A 'Mi; ., • IP flin am ^mmis • < MIK i'i v i:,: iiHiuniiii ., • „. - »i ' aii'iiii!
fli, flff^ i'l'llii!:1!!1''1:;:}' i'l1! !!!i"' [•Ii!!' l|!|!ii!ll"; '^ft:!!!' JUWf. i'i' f^ff' \ ^ft, ^lly1 l;'|riiii|Ii;;!ll:i!|jK /ft:^,,!>; :!:•; i1;;:;;!1"!';!;1" *J$Jjf l jflfttfJJ i1:,], l;;i|iJH,i;:;1 f il;;':',::!; if ijjiljjil^WS Jllf ^^ IIIIIKii;,^^ !: IIS iflipr:1; 1; <:X":M " :;!f|;i!;i||||;i|li ;9ijl|:illll|l jii!!"'! *VgU
ilia iijinijiir' 'hiiii; J7 • iininii' in i ii, i ;i;i •• IIBI HP * \^ \:\', * •< iiipiii11: niiiipp' jit iiiiiiniiiiii <' 111111111111111111111111 LiiippiiiHiiiiii .iinni1:' ••lE^iiiiaaii • i' iiniiiPiiB ; •'< i:!:yiiiii:iiiijHu.i ii:i:ii 'iiri'iy i '< a ill iiiiPii > w \ m:i, \t t • < ;»ii" „, iiijiiniiii11'1" aflaiii i., 11 vs eiijTiiiiiiiii: iiib ,1'ifjjini! BI IIIRK|:IH jL"11! Iii!lii|, r iiibiFFi •, 'f .uiiiUiLKJiiiLHi'iii'i i,..:..»i,, 'iVi'iiJiii 11 , f ffii1111!;1 iifiin
^iii^; ::^< Eiii^MLF^^ l^mttiiaidly Left i^^
Ill IIH^ n'l'liilill- :T :* llv iit'W^ ii'i'lIK^^ !'!^ l'*'^ !l! I I!*1!"!! "I'llllS I! ! II-!""!! I! I1!!!!!!!!! I!"1!!! I!1"!"1!1'1'1 <:!< !l "I-"!1 ' '''''I'"1
1 . " I.
"SSj:, r^Jxx'Siil " i "i"' I illS illi!, ''liwiifME.' Iii' iti t':"x i'xwm'iM., frit i." • Ii!1"'':" ';i"" S; *:' ~-si ii»:i;;ri i si-ii., • 'i!' • •! w,i''.' 'Mi'!. (SxJaiii» i''; witivS|?«ii "(PS'?; ''"SSi ¥ „ M w'f .,111 •iiiii'a^^^^^^ BIB : .asm
m^S}i "'jiff '''ii-ili': ''" j;;' iin !!"::!;(iii:I!!!!'"'iiS^ ' ililS, ^'{''V''-!;<>•""fijit"1; iwS::;' '!• /i' ;;"i::; |•>' J|i• i!1:-'"iiri: :< if1:'1^'iiij!i|^!!!!ii;"!';;' il'w iiv!!!" !i.iS I ^jiii.'-!!liw .; >!:IHIK .''• if iiiji^ SSiJi'!:. ;5i!ioii
iijjjiPiisiinl,I''!'!!1!!!:!! ' i i.. i!iii''t:.iliiij"ii-'f )•;i.I!1'''llij;!!' • iiii 'i'!1:-!*1 lii'iii"."ZXjiKimir 'jiii ii £:i.Ir"!ti! j;'"if:"'wiH^'i1'f5jjp'i''*'1''' liil'l.t'tiiii'1 ii:-!!!!!!''!'IlillK^^^^^ iiiwiwG.iiitiii1 iiiiftilw:'i'«":"iiiii''"'; >> ''iiiii'li i'l's '••!• 'i!-"'IffiSS
Si1 illiliSi 11: Pm "I1' I'liiii lliilill !iliil' ii: iiiiii"' ii111 if' iii i ^ liaSii 'I.'1" 1 'i , i i ^'.., 'ilh'". ,i l:" ;ii !ii'.'' '"I" Pi iii 3, "iiiii " »' Hi Ii''!""' i II ,"i" ill' i ii.ii!3iii™i' i,. i' ''i.. 11,':"'' n i1 w „ ii ii n 'lili i 'jil ill' iii i,' 'ii"'' iiii;ili"i lll™ii|'»r ,''ii I" iiiii!iii!I,'.iS i11'. 'unii :iii[ '.•,.' Si iin 'iiliiiii; 111. in iiliiil: li'liiiiiiiiiii 'i i"' i liiiiH:' i jililii
iiiiii iiiiiiB i'iililiii'iiu"' "lili'iUu '' 'ill1'"' •Ilillilliilii i11 rl'M: ': i'iil"!ii"'""i iiiii' liiiiiiiiiiiiii'" 'i liiiiiiiiiiiii i i'i' ^ i; • • "f9r '! ''iii'l'liuiiiihiiHii ji'"'1!'!!'!!] / '"''ijiiliiiii'iiiri'i' ,n' '' 'i ';„ iiiiliiiiiviTViii'iiiTii'lii''''!"!"!^^^^^^^ I'' ''riiii''!!!!' vili^ 'iii Ti'iiiilliii''!/!'!^!'!?^^^^^^ iiiiii'''!'''!'1"!! i 'i'iiiiiiiiiii'K^ <:l:i'i' ' 'iiiLii'iii": "liiiiiiiiiiii'1'!
iiiiii11! ''•iiiininiiKii11 T ,; ii'iiiii';, P" ; iiiiBiiiii'',' 'H •' u' * liiiiiiiiiiii'«iiiiii n i ii, ji, ii'i1 IPF I'^'iiBiiiiiiiiK liiiiiinii i., i, i i1'' i f; i.1''1 ' 'Piirii "•"' 'IPIIIP } i iiiiii ' i nil „ .."i mi:i' ,111!:,' ii i, ''i in."' iii' inn ii, 'i',, i'' PI! ; i1" n; T "'.T 'iiiiiiHi,,, Ti.' iLiiii :i a i ipippi'i w^^^ „. i iiiiiKi'" liiii'' i, 'i: ''W ii ii'iii: j 'iiip'ii.! ""l
iiiii iiliiiii:}'i !:] ,;iiBiii[ 'ii ii11:. iiiiiiii,';:• '• i,'"'si11" ni;!" 'Hi iiiiiii1''' '1111111111111111111 <' "lij1', ' !• "<•!ifii'i'iiiin f.>v •n' I'lifiEiiii'iiii'i'•ii'ii'ii"< iiiif11'1! i:; '-tiiii'''):"'<:-iiiiKW'' riii'i'iiffiPiiiiii1 iiiJiiiM^^^^^^iiii '" ipi'':» •wiiiiii!:! 1 Mi1 "i"1 'iiii'iiiKii::1"' : 'ii"!1"!'• > ill::,''K-mvi'liiiii1; iiiiii! 'ii1".!
Ill Illllllll IIIIIIII 11 lllllll
-------
*JS
\ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
« WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460
FILE COPY
9442.1995(01)
. OFFICE OF
SOLD WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
Mr. Charles D. Duthler
ICI Composites, Inc.
2055 East Technology Circle
Tempe, AZ 85284
Dear Mr. Duthler:
This is in response to your letter of July 12, 1994, concerning the characterization of
waste streams from polymeric coating operations. You stated that you are working on a
project to ensure that waste streams from polymeric coating operations are properly ^
characterized and you ask several questions related to these waste streams. We have
addressed your questions in the discussions below. In some cases, the determinations you
seek are based on site-specific factors and are best made by the appropriate regulatory agency
(i.e., State, or EPA Region implementing the RCRA program for a particular State).
Where applicable, we have provided general information to assist you in making your
determinations, but we recommend that you contact other more appropriate offices for the
determinations you seek.
1. How does a generator determine if his/her equipment qualifies as a manufacturing process
unit?
As you have noted, the preamble language at 45 FR 72025, October 30, 1980,
describes examples of manufacturing process units. These include "...distillation columns,
flotation units, and discharge trays of screens..." The preamble language also describes
these units as "tanks, or tank-like units (e.g., distillation units) which are designed to hold
valuable products or raw materials in storage or transportation or during manufacturing."
(45 FR 72025, October 30, 1980) A determination of whether the units you describe are
manufacturing process units is best made by the regulatory agency (i.e., EPA Region or
State) implementing the RCRA program in the area of operation. In addition, States with
authorized programs may impose more stringent requirements. For these reasons,
consultation with the State in which polymeric coating operations will take place is
recommended.
2. If an ignitable residue is removed from a unit with a wiper, does the resulting waste
carry the ignitability characteristic, or is the contaminated wiper to be evaluated to determine
if it exhibits the characteristic? How does the mixture rule apply to wipers used to clean
hazardous wastes? .
Rtcycted/flecyclabte
Wnt»d»mnsoy/C»noi« ink en piper tiwt
certain* «t !••« 59% recycled fiber
-------
A material that is a solid waste is by definition hazardous waste if it either 1) meets
one of the listings"in 40 CFR Part 261, Subpart D, or 2) exhibits one or more of the
Characteristics described in 40 CFR Part 261, Subpart C. Because there are no explicit
listings for "used wipers" hi Part 261, Subpart D, a wiper can only be defined as listed
hazardous waste if the wiper either contains listed waste, or is otherwise mixed with
hazardous waste. Whether or not a. used wiper contains a listed hazardous waste, is mixed
with listed hazardous waste, only exhibits a characteristic of hazardous waste, or is not a
waste at all, will require site-specific determination. Any determinations or interpretations
regarding this diverse and variable waste stream should be made by the appropriate State or
EPA Region. We have enclosed a memo from Michael Shapiro to EPA Regional Waste
^_____ jj.^^ Directors ^^ pejjruajy j^ 1994^ on ^ 5^^ Of industrial wipers
and shop towels for your information.
1 l! .«' "t
3. What is the status of the proposed rule amending SW-846 to identify the technique suitable
to determine if a material contains a liquid for an ignitability determination?
r:: ---"The;proposed rule is still' undergoing ^^ review^ p^^^j^ ojf"m^"^(^gy"»"s :
final ruling should occur in early 1995. In the interim, the Paint Filter test is the method to
use to determine if a free liquid is present for ignitability determination
4. How does a generator determine if his/her wastes exhibit tht potential for spontaneous
combustion?
No test method has been promulgated for "spontaneous combustion". It is the
generator's responsibility to compare the properties of his waste with the narrative definition
at 40 CFR §261.21(a)(2) and determine if the waste poses a hazard if improperly disposed.
Also be aware that the U. S. Department of Transportation, at 49 CFR §173.124(b),
discusses "spontaneously combustible material" and describes a Test Method for Materials
Liable to Spontaneous Combustion in 49 CFR Part 173 Appendix E.
I hope this letter is of assistance. If you have further questions, please contact Ann
Codrington at (202)260-4777, or Oliver Fordham at (202)260-4778.
David Bussard,
Characterization and
Assessment Division'
Enclosures
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
FES 7 835 . 9442.1995(02)
7
OFFICE OF
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
Mr. Richard W. Goodwin
Environmental Consultants Associates
14 Ramapo Lane
Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458
Dear Mr. Goodwin:
Thank you for your letter of October 3, 1994 requesting
information about policies regarding self-certification of non-
hazardous waste.
Policies do exist for self-certifying that some types of
waste are non-hazardous but not for others.
If waste is not "listed" nor derived from a "listed".
hazardous waste it would be hazardous only due to characteristics
at 40 CFR 261, .Subpart C. In this case, a generator may either
test the waste or use knowledge to determine that it does not
exhibit one of the regulatory "characteristics" in 40 CFR 261 and
thus is not a hazardous waste.
If the waste is "listed" or derived from a "listed"
hazardous waste, that is, if it appears on one of the lists in 40
CFR 261, Subpart D, then the generator cannot currently self-
determine that a treated or mixed waste is no longer hazardous.
Instead, they must petition EPA to remove their waste under 40
CFR Sections 260.20 and 260.22. The waste is regulated until EPA
grants the petition. All of this is true whether the waste is to
be disposed of, or beneficially recycled, although EPA has
certain special exemptions in 40 CFR 261.2(e), 261.4, and 261.6,
for certain kinds of recycling.
R«eyel«d/H»eyelabl» . Pnnied witfi Vegetable Oil Based mus on 100% Reeled Paper (*0% Postconsumer)
-------
EPA is currently developing a procedure by which listed
pastes can also be self-certified as no longer hazardous. That
rulenjaking is referred to as the Hazardous Waste identification
Jtale. We expect proposal of this rule to be published in the
Register by fall, 1995.
Thank for your interest, and I apologize for the delay in
responding to your inquiry.
Sincerely yours,
•in
Shapiro, Director
of Solid Waste
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
FEB 27 1S95 . 9442.1995(03)
OFFICE Of
SOLD WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
Mr. Daniel Wozniak
Environmental and Safety Engineer
YKK AP America, Inc.
100 Firetower Road
Dublin, GA 31021
Reference: Clarification of F006/F019 Interpretive .Letter
Dear Mr. Wozniak:
This letter is in response to your request for further clarification of our
October 20, 1994 interpretive letter in reference to wastes generated from your
aluminum coating process. The following is the revised version of the letter,
reproduced here for future reference purposes. This action is being taken because
the phrase "metal salts" was inadvertently included in the original letter and is
irrelevant with respect to the intent of the listing.
Your process consists basically of three unit operations which are described
below, together with a discussion of the relevant hazardous waste listing
descriptions: . •
o The aluminum is first anodized.in sulfuric acid. The F006 listing description
(40 CFR 261.31) specifically excludes wastewater treatment sludges from
sulfuric acid anodizing of aluminum. .
o The anodized material is next sealed and colored by immersion in solutions
of inorganic or organic colorants. Neither ferrocyanide nor chromate-
containing solutions are used in this coloring process. The material is finally
coated by electro-deposition with a clear acrylic film.
Based on the information you provided us, these processes apparently do
not involve the use of chromates or cyanides; thus, any wastes generated from this
process do not satisfy the descriptions of F006 or F019. Additionally, since these
processes are not identified in any of the specific or non-specific source hazardous
waste listings in 40 CFR Part 261, Subpart D, any wastes generated from this
'Recycled/Recyclable'
_ MmedwtthSoyCinol«lnkenp»Mf«w«-
FaxBack* 11940 "" X_i
-------
process would only be subject to evaluation for hazardous waste characteristics as
specified at 40 CFR Part 261 Subpart C.
I " i " i "
Please be aware that under Section 3006 of RCRA (42 U.S.C. Section 6926}
individual States can be authorized to administer and enforce their own hazardous
waste programs in lieu of the Federal program. When States are not authorized to
Administer their own program, the appropriate EPA Regional office administers the
programand is the appropriate contact for any case-specific determinations.
^ease also note that under Section 3009 of RCRA (42 U.S.C, Section 6929)
Spates retain authority to promulgate regulatory requirements that are more
stringent than Federal regulatory requirements. Although this interpretation
indicates that the wastes generated from the above processes are not subject to
the hazardous waste listings under federal regulations, the wastes may therefore
be subject to more stringent state or local regulations.
| Than,l X°,y far, yj>ul Patience in this matter, If you have any further
questions, please contact Max Diaz of my staff at (202) 260-4786.
Wjlliam F. Brandes
Chief, Waste Identification Branch
• i
cc;
Jeffrey T. Pallas, Region IV
Renee Hudson Woodley, Georgia DNR
'"I III. 'Jl|li
_ /: i !
'i i1 in i11
ill iiMiiui Prill i »i i iiiiiiiiiliiirTifi 11 ui 11 if"" i ilium in ' iii ii 111111* 11 fir" in "
-------
tftOST.,,
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
1 ^ 1Q94 OFFICE OF
I J wo^ SOLO WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE •
Mr. Daniel Wozniak .
Environmental and Safety Engineer
YKK AP America/ Inc.
100 Firetower Road
Dublin, GA 31021
Dear Mr. Wozniak: . -
This letter is in response to your letter .of November 24,
1993. outlining your aluminum coating process, and inquiring if
any of the wastes generated meet the hazardous waste listing
descriptions for F006 or F019 published at 40 CFR 261.31. We
have consulted with Mr. Jeffrey T. .Pallas, Hazardous Waste
Management Branch, U.S. EPA Region IV and Ms. Renee Hudson
Goodley, Georgia Department of Natural Resources in preparing
this response.
According to your description in your letter, your process
consists basically of three unit operations which are described
below, together with a discussion of the -relevant hazardous waste
listing descriptions: .
o The aluminum is first anodized in sulfuric acid. The F006
listing description (40 CFR 261.31) specifically excludes
wastewater treatment sludges.from sulfuric acid anodizing of
aluminum.
o The anodized material is next sealed.and colored by
immersion in solutions of inorganic or organic colorants.
Neither ferrocyanide nor chromate-containing solutions are
used in this coloring process. The material is finally
coated by electro-deposition with a clear acrylic film.
Based on the information you provided us, these processes
apparently do not involve the use of metal salts, chromates, or
cvanides; thus, any wastes generated from this process do not
satisfy the descriptions of F006 or F019. Additionally, since
?hese Processor! not identified in any.of thespecific or non-
specific source hazardous waste listings in 40 CFR Part 261,
• Subpart D, any wastes generated from this process would only be
subject to evaluation for hazardous waste characteristics, as
specified at 40 CFR Part 261 Subpart C.
-------
[ ' I !
I
i
i
'n ; .Please be aware that under Section 3006 of RCRA (42 u s c
Section 6926) individual States can be authorized^ adminifier
aqd enforqe their own hazardous waste programs in lieu of Jhe
Federal program, when States are not authorized to administer
er own program, the appropriate EPA Regional office . uer
is fc?e aPProP"ate. contact for any
. Please also note that under '
°f RC?A U2 U'S-C- Sectio* 6*29) States Stain .
"Sulatory requirements that are more
&^tO^ requirements. Although this .
that the wastes generated from the above
5?* sv^^ct tO the ^^rdous waste -listings unde?
«
Si? °nS4 th? Wast?S ^ ther*fore be subject to more
state or local regulations.
^ r patience in this Mt.t.r/ Jf u -^
26- Please contact Max Diaz of my staff at (202)
260-4786.
Sinie
•
"1' "1
• >iK;|aj « •
I „„ ii!,,,,, ,||n ,„,,, ,,, , !„, , i ,, , ,, ,, , ,, ,,, ,, , „ , ,, „,! |, ,,,,,,, , , , „,,,„
a i iiiiiiiiiiii'' iiii:i«'iiiiiiniMii!'! ft iiiii'iiiiif i" '» r*i":i::. iiiiiiifiiiii' 'ms ii:! ;i iiiii: iKr :iiiiiiiiaiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiu:"'1 f niiigii'';:::' 'ii, iiji iniiiiiiiJiiiiiiifiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii' ^i ?i ^'"" :;i iijiii'ii' i,i: "'iiimiin:: 4:' ' yiv j«?., • "h iinim
|» Waste Identification- Branch
nil IIII ,;,!!,rsiiij,, i ijjjljihni niijjijj, ''iiLtiiiiajaniiijin^ < liBifiiiiiiiljiiiJ l1!!'*!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!'^ yVK "BilPi!,,,,!;!!!!;!!1,!!!1'; pi; ''"liNllliK1 'iliiiy'i y ;; ^i1"' I 'rtl'/liiilii^'!*1/!!:1!!!;;'!!!11 'hy!:,!!!1'!!*!!"''?111? il!;:: iif" IJIilrSSiJIf,!!1!!!!1!!*!] i!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1!!;;]!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:!!!!!!!!!^!!!!!!1'!'"', ^ > ,» 'K!!-!,"',"!,111!!,!!,!,1 :'",,,,n' 'ii:,'';,,'"'!!!!!" ,i ui'iri, ",i
^ i:%a ':;!i iiijg-:;i!:ii js:iiitK>'m .^
, , i,;: , ; , ; SS.S , Y T. Pallas,' Region IV
i, , „ „
........ ' ................. i ' .............. ...... l|| ............. « ..... , .............. . ......... II, ........ ................. I' ........... .................................. ' ................................ ',: 1 1, ,!;''!„ ,l>. ..... IIP ...... ...... ..... II ,< , '.< ....... " ........ , ..... ........... ..... " ........ , < ......... 'I ' , nJPI' Illlllil. lllUli^i"1 »."',.l,..i .„ ll'li ' '"! 'I"! ', ,| ...... I .....
....... li!ll!i;>" ..... 19 ...... i., -Ililllllli!, ..... in^^^^^^ ...... Si'iilll ...... P'l ..... Wjafims^W«''(... iJiOi::.1.^^!^ ....... *:! ...... *.*: •**"•? .......
, , , „. ..... i , , • i
I ..... ni|P|l|' |»IL| ;|i|ll!!H!l!li ,'i|:i "ll nil1," »• iiilllllllplllllllpllllllpllll Ihillil^'HVI' , 'JiliViP:! ..... |fli;|l ....... IIIUIIVIS", ..... III,!!!!!!!1! ll'i'l'in,; Till ...... i|.n>, ........ ft,, * „ i: ' Jll ..... ,ni| ...............
'
i'i iiiiii"fciiirjii'iii'.Jiiiiiiiin~i, ''" u' iiitr HIIIF ™' , i,,, m1' d1*i 11• i i" inim1 TTiisii «
-------
. I
'
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 '
MAY 25 1995
9442.1995X04)
. ' OFFICE OF
. SOLD WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE '
Priscilla F. Adler
DEMETRIOU, DEL GUERCIO, SPRINGER & MOVER
801 South Grand Avenue, 10th Floor. .
Los Angeles, California 90017-4613 •
Dear Ms. Adler:
I am writing in response to your May 10, 1995 request for an interpretation of .40 CFR
261.32 with respect the scope of EPA Hazardous Waste No. K052 ("tank bottoms (leaded) from
the petroleum industry"). Specifically, you inquired whether or not tank bottoms removed from
tanks containing only naphtha would be deemed to be K052 hazardous wastes.
The scope of the K052 hazardous waste listing is limited to only those tank bottoms
generated at or as part of a petroleum refinery from tanks employed" in the storage of leaded
gasoline or leaded blending fractions. These tank bottoms are covered by the K052 hazardous
waste listing even if they do not exhibit any other characteristic of a hazardous waste.
Naphtha is an unleaded petroleum fraction isolated for blending or production of other
blending stocks. The tank bottoms from only naphtha storage at a refinery would not be a listed
hazardous waste under 40 CFR 261.31, and would not otherwise be subject to regulation as a
hazardous waste unless they exhibited one of the characteristics of a hazardous waste, as
provided for in 40 CFR 261.21 - 261.24.
Please note that under section 3006 of RCRA, individual states- can be authorized to
administer and enforce their own hazardous waste programs hi lieu of the Federal program. In
addition, section 3009 of RCRA allows states to promulgate regulatory requirements that are
more stringent than the Federal program. Therefore, you .should contact die appropriate state
environmental agency in your state for other applicable laws and regulations that may exist.
If you have any further questions, please contact John Austin at (202) 260-4789.
Sincerely, : •
Michael Shapiro, Director
Office"of Solid Waste
FaxBack* 11941
0
R^ycUd.R«cyclabl«. Printed wiinVegetaWeQl Based tnw on 100% Recydeo Paper (40% Poswnsunw)
-------
,'"• .
''II
DEMETRIOU. DEL GUERCIO. SPRINGER & MOVER
ATTORNEYS AT LAW .
• Ol SOUTH GMANO AVCNUC. IO»» rLC
, LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA.. 90017-4613
J. OCU OUCMCIO
-icrrncv i,
A. MOVCR
......
SHAN AMAf
A, DEL OUCftCIO
MICMACU A. FRANCIS
tAUMiC C, DAVIS
•tCOfMA UUOZIUS COBB
UCSLIC H. SMARIO
-ICNNircn M •UNMAN
OMC0OMr O. THIMAMCHC
KCWMIT O. MAMSM
KAMCN MCUAUMIN CHANG '
^«l*CH.Uk r. AOkCM
AMOIVJCW J. •KACKCH
CHHIS O. OCMCTKIOU (IOIS-IOOC
or COUNSCL.
May 10, 1995
•ticHAito A. OCL oucncio
W. SCOTT LOVCJOT m
JAMCS *. OCL OUCKCIO
WILLIAM ELLIOTT VINCV
JOHN s. MCDONALD
MAWGABCT •. HILOCa*AND
(2131
.
Mr. Michael Shapiro
Director, Office of Solid Waste
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency"
401 M Stre'et, Room 2101 ••
Washington, D.C. 20460 ...
* i , ,: i , , ,:, , , in r, n,: t n , i|n ' ,
I1:!!, i1 ,»! |\;:I!!-:"'Re: Request for Rule Interpretation
Pear Mr. Shapiro: • .
We are herewith requesting that the U.S. Environmental
Protection" Agency (the "EPA") provide to us a written
interpretation of 40 CFR § 261:32 with respect to the scope of the
"Em Hazardgus Waste No , KQ52 ("tank bottoms (leaded) from the
petroleum industry")< Specifically, are tank bottoms removed from
tanks containing naptha deemed to be K052 hazardous wastes, if the
tanks have never held leaded gasoline? , '
• • j —
Doug of the EPA RCRA Hotline informed me on May 9, 1995
that' pursuant to a. February, 1994 oral interpretation by the EPA,
£052 refers only to tank bottoms from tanks that have held leaded
gasoline._.We are seeking.a written rule interpretation so that we
may ^properly advise our clients of any federal requirements
applicable to the disposal of naptha tank bottoms.
telephone me if you have any questions.
PFA:mhs
UP008\NPW052.LTR
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIROMMENTAL PROTECTIOM AGENCY
FEB 2 4 !995
9443.1995(01)
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Debris and Soil Contaminated with Explosive Residues
FROM: James F. Michael, Chief
Disposal Technology Section (5303W)
Office of Solid Waste
TO: Lawrence A. .Wapensky, Chief
Utah/North Dakota Section
Region VIII
This responds to your January 20, 1995 memorandum requesting
assistance in answering questions raised by the State of Utah
concerning regulatory issues pertaining to wastes contaminated
with explosive residues. A
The first question raises concern with the reference at
40 CFR 261.23(a)(8) to certain Department of Transportation (DOT)
regulations concerning explosive classifications, that are cited
as criteria for determining the characteristic of reactivity.
The DOT regulations cited at §261.23(a)(8) have recently been
changed and expanded to conform with Department of Defense hazard
classes, therefore, presenting difficulties in implementing the
Federal regulatory definition of reactivity under RCRA. Until
such time that §261.23(a)(8) is updated, those referenced DOT
regulations can not be used for determining reactivity.1
Reactivity determinations should be made using the remaining
criteria at §261.23(a)(l)-(7).'
The second question asks whether and when liquid, solid, or
debris mixed with explosives would be considered reactive.
Wastes, whether themselves explosives, or media contaminated with
explosives would be considered reactive by meeting the definition
of reactivity as described in §261.23(a)(l)-(7). Wastes that do
not meet the criteria in §261.23(a)(1)-(7) would not be
considered reactive.
The third question regards other Federal criteria for
explosivity. If agencies such as the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
and Firearms (BATF) have regulations, or protocols, for
determining whether or not a substance is explosive, those
regulations or protocols would not be enforceable under_EP»
idA>-j«tti'»iv rrtxtea at Kecycled Paper -us. Gov«nw«m Prtnting one*: lisz-
-------
•
II ^
regulations, unless they became incorporated into our rules.
Specific methods used by agencies such as BATF to determine if a
substanceisanexplosive could, however, be applied to determine
whether a, waste is reactive according to §261.23(a)(6) or (7).'
for the opportunity to address questions related
to the reactivity characteristic as it relates to explosives. If
you have any questions, please call Jeff Gaines at (703) 308-
8655. . ••*-.'
I ||||||||| | pi m p iiiiiT'i 'i' 'ii <«« 'iniiJ! i; :ii „ „: i" «iinii, „" •>• il .1.1'lr1 :• it ^ nii'i ' v\
cc: Frank McAlister, AB, PSPD, OSW
Gaines, ABt PSPD, OSW
llillll till
i-niisf! " •• . im;111 pii ,IT .iirwiii,"1 l::iiiiiiiiiiit: iiiiii 'r • :>.•,; i.woiui i sjissi! n i,.1)"1!-:; y.\- ,"*['.•!•<,• j,.*;,*1-!",: ;juXM iwiv ,.,, •.
- Iif ft • ,, ;,/' lllijr ')i !"i|' ti!1!1!,:'1 '?:* Ill:1 -fM ':' i. ''" "f : tt'K ""'f'lil'ift'SI '•• ''.I t!" * ".i'"::!-*;! it':Hi'f]"-i!!«; '.J' Mil: 1 9<,\»'''. WBFj!': ||'i 'iSSiKti'JiiJ • "f ''f i1 £ i y ,,f]:r f.'i't-HS'
fi'l Ul „ I -:'!' .[jlillhlliiiV'^ilHI'lJillill.!!!! IllHillllii: I IMP" i illpiit'lpil1;!!,,,!1!!, 1 '"I1 P'lnilili'SI PIP, i' ll ll'> M ''"IVl'l li"»" lil'V1"!1! :,i ' iiiil. 111' PI!1' I : mil'll'ill! JPII'i/PldtiJ''.^!!!!'!'!!^!!::!!!!''!!! rii .ililPPm .iipPn'PPIiihl'PI! Inl/lPi,! Iif! »I"I.!"/IIIIPP '1"':"'. IjPL'WiiTP'" ':.!' /i ''Plllli .!'. "li'JIij.lliili,,1 IP! !i PlinPIPPPI! Will' ' lj'1111
IE' ,<• }llriii"S ": l' ' IIIIlll"] iiiil«;jjiiii»i"!tl'i!!ll," i-'lllir. llillll ' A: 1 '•» fit t :;K j-i",,!:!;;, ;.f , • "p: ;'•«(!,.D' , ''ijti •(; (t ,f., f,,, • -.., i: .liE'iifi iBlltii11;;,;:!,!!- vi,:iilill! rHtf^SfOR'.'!. i.l •?•»., "iS"!Sft ^;. ' . i S.'. IS. iiii::! f'ilfme::; aw»*t ISW Sill
j'v Pj, IPIP i PI i,1' nil'i'iili, ' ' i IIIIIEI PHI ' i|"!;, i I, 'iii!' I''. I''''»' vl '< /PI iplillllil'd i llllllli F 1''",! ''" P i ; i'1"1! 'Pi i ill! I,! 'i pi IVill1,'. , lliiu'F IPII "'" I'll1', 'I1 'I"'', ! ,', pi! ' ''.I11 '' „" IIP!"1!'!!!' I "P ' ,' i, ' <|P i' i'P 1 'i'MII, iiiP1' IP .I!;.!!1 Illl, 14: IIPPliippi. ", I iiiiPlli: 11! JP ;" ,; I1;! |P' PlililPlpPIl jy-1, ,;' "i i :iln' J IP lillp."', ' in" I, (I'!' I;L ,p |P|', ' ',,1:1: /', I'" IIP; i' 'I'lfl I iiilliil111 'illlliflUJIi JIB',' P JIIIP'B i/;, J'11'FP 'I' Tljl
IIH i(ll lli|i i III 11 I ii 111 II llillll i I l I i I 11 I 11 i|H|l
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460
AU624 {995
9443.1995(02)
OFFCEOF
SOLD WASTE AND EMERGENCY
Mr. T. L. Nebrich, Jr. RESPONSE
Technical Director
Waste Technology Services, Inc.
640 Park Place
NY 14301
Eear Mr. Nebrich:
Thank you for your letter of July 31, 1995 requesting a clarification of the
difference between the definition for the characteristic of ignitability as it pertains to
sc lids vs. liquids. As you are aware, there is no officially promulgated or required
m ethod for. determining the ignitability of solid samples or sludges at this time. Of the
tw o flash point methods, Method 1010, Pensky-Martens, has some utility for liquid
sa tuples with non-filterable, suspended solids. If your samples contain filterable solids,
th ey are not amenable to the Pensky-Martens flash point test Flash point testing is only
appropriate for liquid samples. It should not be applied to solids.
The Office of Solid Waste has developed and proposed a test to determine the
igjiitabiliiy of solids (SW-846 Method 1030). Our procedure is based on the Department
of Transportation (DOT) burn rate test listed in 49 CFR §173.124 and Appendix E. You
sh Duld separate the solid/liquid phases of your samples and test each phase separately,
lie uids by flash point and solids by the DOT procedure.
It is the generator's responsibility to make sure their waste is not hazardous for
th; characteristic of ignitability as described in 40 CFR §26121. As we do not have a
pr >mulgated method required by regulations to test for the ignitability of solids of
sh dges at present, we recommend you use generator knowledge of the waste when
aviflable supplemented by tests appropriate to the waste if necessary. When specified
tes t methods are not available and generator knowledge is insufficient to make a
ha ardous waste determination, it is always wise to check with your state or regional
El A office for approval of the protocol you wish to follow in making a hazardous waste
de lermination.
There have been clarifications to our guidance on how to determine a free liquid
since the 1989 letter to Mr. Travis P. Wagner on the subject In a January 13,1995
Federal Register Notice (60FR3089) in Section IV.C there is a paragraph on "Free
Lichiids and Characteristic Tests." A copy is enclosed for your convenience.
-------
I II
I hope that this information will be beneficial to your industry. If you have any
question, please feel free to call Oflie Fqrdham of my staff at (202) 260-4778.
Sincerely,
closure
iro, Director
•lid Waste
-------
WASTE TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INC.
July 31, 1995
Mr. Michael Shipiro, Director ''•'••'
Of f ice. of Solid Waste . .
Environmental Protection Agency
40-1 M Street, ..S. W. : ;
Washington, . DC. . 20460 .
Dear Mr. Shipiro:
T5ere nas been a discussion ragging in our industry
, DOT
We have tried to point out that non-liquid, solid wast*.
cannot meet the definition of a RCRA characteristic of
.ignitability 40CFR 261.21 unless it is -not Tligiid and is
capable, under standard temperature and pressure .
2) 1 • Now ^^ the subcategories f o^ DOOl'on
^ "^f8 f* even more difficult ?o -
whh i? as i^itable since there is no category
which fits a Flammable Solid in 40CFR261. 21 (a) (1). te9°ry
°U
clarify the difference between the
Characteristic of Ignitability as it
(non-liquids) vs. liquids. Has there been
e 1989 t0 letter ^^ Travis P-
to
sh?uld have any questions, please do not hesitate
Very truly yours,
WASTE TECHNOLOGY SERVICES;) INC.
T. L. Nebrich, Jr., CHMM
Technical Director
TLN/kjl
Enclosure
40 Park Place. Niagara Falls. New York. 14301 .
Telephone 716-282-4100 • Fax 716-282-6986
-------
1
*is F t< i si «& < m rJ1; i!i>':|ii3»^^^^^
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
9443.1995(03)
Mr. T. L. Nebrich, Jr.
Technical Director
Waste Technology Services, Inc.
640 Park Place .
Niagara Falls, NY 14301
Dear Mr. Nebrich:
Thank you for your follow up letter of August 31, 1995 to
Michael Shapiro requesting further clarification of the
characteristic of ignitability as it pertains to solids versus
liquids. . .
40 CFR 261.21 (a) (1) is only applicable to liquids as a
definitive test for the characteristics of ignitability. There is
no promulgated definitive test for the ignitability of solids
(i.e., physically a solid with no free liquid) , If a solid flashes
using some modification of the flash point test, this may indicate
there is a potential problem with the sample such as contamination
with ignitable.volatiles and further investigation may be in order.
The flash point test alone is not definitive for determining the
ignitability of solids, but may be used with other evidence to
build a case for a waste being classified as an ignitable hazard.
I hope that this information will be beneficial to your
industry. If you have any questions, please feel free to call
Ollie Fordham of my staff at (202) 260-4778.
. • Sincerely yours,
Gail Hansen
Chief,
Methods Section. (5304)
-------
•!
WASTE TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INC.
jilt I i
II i 1 'jl 111 III1 li "I I ill iii 11 n August 31, 1995
eceived
Agency
Mr. Michael Shipiro, Director
pffice of Solid Waste
Environmental Protecti<
]401 M S-treet, S. W.
Washington, DC' 20460
Dear Mr. Shipiro:
I * „ • , t » , ", :••*!,
As a follow up to my July 31, 1995 letter and your
response (enclosed) regarding the characteristic of
ignitability as it pertains to solids vs. liquids, J would
liV.e to request a.further clarification.
Is it possible or correct to identify a solid waste (ie.
physically a solid with no free liquid) as RCRA D001
(characteristic of ignitiability) according to 40CFR
261.21(a)(1). i realize that you could have a RCRA D001 non-
liquid as defined in 40CFR 26l.21(a)(2) or (4). However,
since there are only flash points for liquids, could you have
a solid WAS;te characterized as a RCRA D001 based solely on a
flash point? • .
I'll ulllillllllllllllllii ,< I,; iiiillliU .iffi'i i:il|U|l!ll!llliMN"!HHI ILinniiilllili'iilil" ililHIIH III I'll ill "III!1!! i,! HIIIRg..!!1, N
:!'!1!!!,, U'llliMIIIIISi''!!!!!!!!11 f l!'"<
'i1 I "i1 !i1r:J| N
t If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate
to call. • .
•
Very truly, yours,,-
HASTE TECHNOLOGY SERVICES, INC
T. L. Nebrich, Jr., CHMM
Technical Director
TLN/kjl
II lIlllllllllB^^^^
Enclosure
€40 PuTk Pl»», Niagara Falls. New York 14301
Telephone 7.16-282-410C
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
-------
Volume 6
Addendum
Place the attached
documents at the end
of the appropriate
Category Number in
Volume 6
-------
in iiiiii iiii 111 iiiii i iiiiiii 111111 i ii 1 ii i iiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiii n in in ii in iiiiii i i n i i i iiiiii i':;ii^ :>«i rii ;.i
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
~
H
I III
II
|i| iiii iiiiii i in n iiii iiiiii 111 i i IF iiii •• n HI iiiiiiii iiiiiii i in id in linn IP i in in i|i| iiii i iiiiiii in i n iii iiii ii in 11 ii in in iiiii 11 in i 11 1111 iiii in ii i
•i iiiiiiiiiii i iiiiiii iiiii ii iiiiiii i iiiiiiii in iiiiiii i iiiiiiiii in in in i iiii i iiiii i in i i i iini iiiiii MI iiiiii iiiii i n ii iiii n 11 i n i in 11 i iiiii i n iiiiiii iiiiiiiii iiiii
Inn ii ii inn [iiiii i uiitt;; jjiiniH ^ ' iiiiiiii » :ILW iii'' i "iiiiii: jini't fiivi1 n'wiiii ;i ,„;,, *;M| r 'ii'iji1: 'in: * iiHr 11 i!":i"ip< ii^t'iLiH iiiiiiji jFi'ii K^iaiv11 ;TI iiibni, iii:;,!!;1; 'i;,:;!!";1 mif'ji wi'iiii" ..niiii;!;;!;"1' film >; fjinarhiiiiii •; <:»n "
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGEN6Y
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
•^ *
' • ' ' - • FEB I? 1995 .'. • 9444,1995(01) ' :.
• . ' ' ' . . OFFICE OF
. SOLO WASTE AND EMERGENCY
• ' ; ' • '. . RESPONSE
MEMORANDUM -: . ' ,
•SUBJECT: P and U
' .„ ^Z *Ks=fer^^—
osw
• wJJevereaux Barnes
: we
- //permits and State Programs Dxvision,
TO- ' Norm Nie'dergang, Director
Office of RCRA, Region V
on this matter
• The RCRA contained-in policy applies to^P and U ligj*
such a listed waste. . .
Workgroup Ind we will keep them apprised of any further
.developments regarding this concept.
. If you have "any ciuestions, please contact Dave Pagan or -
Carolyn ^sklnson of my staff, at (703) 308-8620 and
(703) 308-8626 respectively.
cc: J. Boyle
K. Pierard
B. Pace
T. Kaneen
Racyctod/ftecyctabte
Prtnttd with Soy/ttnoto mk on pcptr thai
-------
n i in ii n n
nni i i n n i nil i
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
111
H f ' '« Hi '.!i /,!!
-------
HOTLINE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
September1995 • 9444.1995(02)
RCRA
1. Isomers of P- and U-Listed Wastes
The P and U lists at 40 CFR §§26133(e)
and (f) identify chemicals which, when
discarded as unused commercial chemical
products, are listed hazardous-wastes. If a
particular P- or U-listed chemical has many
isomers, are those isomers listed hazardous
wastes as well?
Many chemicals on the P and U lists have
multiple isomers. Isomers are compounds
made up of the same atoms in the same
proportions, but which have different
chemical structures and potentially different
chemical properties. These different forms of
a chemical can be identified precisely and
given unique Chemical Abstract Service
(CAS) numbers. For example, toluenediamine
(C?Hi3N2) may have many isomers, including
toluene-2-4-diamine (CAS# 95-80-7) and
toluene-2-6-diamine (CAS# 823-40-5), that
differ structurally. Chemicals also may be
identified as "mixed isomers." Mixed isomers
include all mixtures of individual isomers of a
compound. For instance, the generic mixed
isomer designation of toluenediamine (CAS#
25376-45-8) includes mixtures of the isomers
toluene-2-4-diamine and toluene-2-6-diamine.
EPA may choose to include all isomers of
a chemical on the P or U list by listing the
mixed isomer or generic name of the
compound. If the generic mixed isomer name
and CAS number of.a compound appear on
the P or U list, then any individual isomers of
that compound and all mixtures of .isomers of
that compound meet the listing description. .
Thus, when discarded in its commercial
chemical product form, the isomer toluene-2-
4-diamine (CAS# 95-80-7) is a listed
•hazardous waste, because the generic mixed
isomer toluenediamine (CAS# 25376-45-8) is
listed as U221.
EPA may also choose to designate only
specific isomers of a chemical as P- or U-
listed hazardous wastes. When a particular •
isomer is designated, then only that isomer is
covered by that particular listing. For
example, U140 covers isobutyl alcohol (CAS#
78-83-1), an isomer of butanoL Since the
U140 listing includes only isobutyl alcohol,
other isomers of butanol are not U140
(although they may be listed elsewhere).
-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
11II 111 11 III I Fllilnl'iVI 11 III III
-------
HOTLINE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS.
- April 1995 , 9445.1995(01)
RCRA
2. Nitroglycerin Patches: Not Listed
Hazardous Wastes When Discarded
Unused •
Nitroglycerine can be administered as a
medication by applying a patch containing the
chemical to a patient's skin. Nitroglycerine
appears on the P-list of RCRA hazardous.
wastes and carries the waste code P081 (40
CFR§26133(e)). When nitroglycerine
patches are discarded unused, must they be
classified as P-listed hazardous waste?
Discarded unused nitroglycerine patches
are not classified as P-listed hazardous waste.
The P- and U-lists of hazardous wastes at 40
CFR §261.33(e) and (f) apply to unused
discarded commercial chemical products.
EPA refers to commercialchemicalproducts
as commercially pure grades and technical
grades of the listed chemicals or chemical
formulations in which the listed chemical is
the sole active ingredient (54 FR 31335,
31336; July 28,1989). Although
nitroglycerine may be the only chemically
active component of a medical patch, a
nitroglycerine patch is considered a
manufactured article, similar to mercury-
containing thermometers, not a commercial
chemical product. EPA did not intend for the
phrase "commercial chemical product" to
. apply to manufactured articles like medical
patches that contain a chemical listed in
§261.33. Unused discarded nitroglycerine
patches are regulated under RCRA Subtitle C
only if they exhibit a characteristic of
hazardous waste.
-------
Ill I II III III III! II
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
n i in nil i in i in nil in i in i n i in i n i linn n n i i i n mi i in n n n n inn i i in n n i linn 11 in in i in n nil
-------
FILEGOPY
\ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
§ WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
•**t«*^
AUG 21 1995
9451.1995(01)
OFFICE OF
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY
• . RESPONSE
Mr. James M. Kuszaj
Ogletree, Keakins, Nash, '
Smoak & Stewart .
4101 Lake Boone Trail
Post Office Box 31608
Raleigh, North Carolina 27622
Dear Mr. Kuszaj:
Thank you for your letter of July 6, ,1995, requesting EPA's current interpretation of the -
requirements in 40 CFR §262.12 regarding EPA identification numbers. You ask the following
four questions related to obtaining more than one EPA identification number (I.D. number) for a
geographically contiguous piece of property.
• Is there any prohibition against maintaining multiple I.D. numbers for the same property?
• Can two autonomous divisions of the same company co-located on the same property be
considered separate generators and be issued separate I.D. numbers?
• Would the answer to the question above be different if the aggregation of waste from both
divisions caused one of the divisions to change regulatory classification. For example, to
move from a conditionally exempt SQG to a large quantity generator?
• Would EPA or the state need to be specifically informed that there are separate I.D.
numbers for the same property?
The regulations at 40 CFR §262.12 require a generator to have an EPA I.D. number
before treating, storing, disposing of, transporting, or offering for transportation, hazardous
waste. Because the regulations do not explicitly state how I.D. numbers should be distributed,
you should contact the state authorized to implement the RCRA program in your area with
specific questions. Notwithstanding the preceding, the following terms are useful in any
discussion of I.D. numbers and their applicability to generation sites.
The definition of generator found in 40 CFR §260.10 Is "any person, by site, whose act
or process produces hazardous waste identified or listed in part 261 of this chapter or whose act
first causes a hazardous waste to become subject to regulation." The definition of a person in 40
CFR §260.10 is "an individual, trust, firm, joint stock company, Federal Agency, corporation
(including a government corporation), partnership, association, State, municipality, commission;
political subdivision of a State, or any interstate body." Individual generation site means the
contiguous site at or which one or more hazardous wastes are generated. An individual
Recycled/Recyclable
Printed wttfi Soy/Canela ink on paper that
-------
, urn " di.'i ifl,!,:1
•
. ' ' .......... :«,»
generation site, such as a large manufacturing plant, may have one or more sources of hazardous
waste but is considered a single or individual generation site if the "site or property is contiguous.
In your letter, you describe two autonomous divisions of a company which occupy
different portions of a contiguous piece of property. The company as a whole would meet the
definition of "person" in 40 CFR §260.10 and although autonomous, the divisions would not
generally be considered separate generators if they 'operate ; on .a ^ §£Ographically contiguous piece
pf property meeting the definition of "individual generation site."
Although there is no specific prohibition in the regulations against a generator
baintaining multiple I.D. numbers for an individual generation site, the Agency expects each
individual generation site to have one I.D. number. Of course the approved state RCRA program
may have specific state law requirements which operate in lieu of the federal program.
;ts for multiple I.D. numbers for one individual generation site must be evaluated
a case by case basis by the authorized state (or EPA Regional office in the case of Alaska,
[Hawaii, Wyoming, Iowa and the U.S. Territories other than Guam) to determine whether the
and perhaps its waste streams) can be separated in some meaningful way. Where the
entity's accounting practices_ djctate separate documentation for waste streams, it may make
^£iS§£, fSLlilS, §BIS ,2,r,,,,&?Si°n to likewise monitor them separately, the Agency does not intend
1™ ' I'1 '|2£ properties to be subdivided forthe purpose of avoiding regulation, e.g. by slipping under the
small quantity-generator limitation.
EPA assumes that states assigning multiple I.D. numbers for one individual generation
kite do so because the entity (and perhaps its waste streams) is separate in some meaningful way.
Therefore, EPA does not expect to be informed where there is more than one I.D. number for an
individual generation site. However, since you state in your letter .that the two autonomous
divisions owned by the same company were not aware that the other had obtained a separate I.D.
iTj it may be necessary to inform the state since formd application for two numbers for one
individual generation site has not been made and the requisite evaluation has not been done.
Finally, please be reminded that authorized states may impose requirements different than
federal requirements which may, among other things, have the effect of limiting or increasing the
number of I.D. numbers per individual generation site. If you have further questions on this
inatter, please contact Ann Codrington of my staff at (202) 260-8551.
'lip: U It"1 jjlil 'llNiU'llliilLIIPMi. Mil 'nl II mi' V'llilWI'll II
Sincerely,
• III 111! I 111 III 11 111
(I
Michael Petruska, Chief
Regulatory Development Branch
-------
LAW OFFICES
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART
LAKE BOONE TRAIL
POST OFFICE BOX 3I6O8
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27622
TELEPHONE <9I9) 787-97OO
FAX <9I9) 783-9412
reeeivi
JAMES M. KUSZAJ, PH.O.
PARTNER
July 6, 1995
OTHER OFFICES:
OREENVILLE. SOUTH CAROLINA
WASHINGTON. O. C.
ATLANTA. GEORGIA
COLUMBIA. SOUTH CAROLINA
NASHVILLE. TCNNCSSCC
ALBANY. NEW VOPK
Michael Shapiro
Director, Office of Solid Waste
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C.
Re:
Generator Identification Numbers
40 C.F.R. 5262,12
Dear Mr. Shapiro:
I am writing to request EPA's current interpretation of the requirements in 40
C.F.R. §262.12 as they relate to generators of hazardous waste obtaining multiple EPA
identification numbers for a geographically contiguous piece of property.
My specific questions involve the following facts:
Company A owns a large geographically contiguous piece of property. Two
autonomous divisions of Company A occupy different portions of the property. Each
division generates and manages its own hazardous waste. Each division applied for and
obtained from either EPA or the state a unique generator identification number. Since
the divisions were autonomous, neither was aware that the other had obtained a separate
I.D. number.
Given these facts, my questions are:
1. Is there any prohibition against maintaining multiple I.D. numbers for the same
property? "-
2. Czz two autonomous divisions of the same company co-located on the same
property be considered separate generators and be issued separate I.D. numbers?
-------
Michael ........ Shapiro
;U,SS Environmental Protection Agency
July 6, 1995
Page 2
3.
4.
Would ........ the ......... answer ........ to ......... Question ........ 2 Jbe .......... different ...... jf ....... the .......... aggregation of waste from
..... regulatory classification. For
, .
example, to move from a conditionally exempt SQG to a large quantity generator?
Would EPA or the state need to be specifically informed that there are separate
I.D. numbers for the same property?
JJjaSl vou for y00* attention to the matter. I look forward to hearing from you.
I
Sincerely yours,
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH,
SMOAK & STEWART, L.L.P.
in in i i mini n i n i in nil 1 1 in linn n ii in i i n i ill i 11111111111111111111111 1 1 1 in mi n nun inn i in nun i nil nil 1 1 n i in mini i \ j^^ f\TV ' ^ *^ 5 *\ Vv-J'u- C^\J ^ j"""'L V
(T "
James M. Kuszaj
i
JMK/mvk
i "
li'iiiiBjS'j'Hi1' ' v ,T fv niwi/iiii1!" iiniiaiinipiu,u\f::iiii| i :!i IB ......... W0.m ...... :«!! iiilnCi 1 ....... ' ..... I! ..... • ..... IRii'l ....... JWHM ..... JR'^^^^^
*
.will; ...... 's ; w , • iiiiiiii! >f\ i n , ; • ' "f» 51 , ;<„;:' iii;, ' 'tiijih ' :'< ! aifr "i jpi iiiiinjiwiiL, ...... f::iii " i „ tj s> ,,» * , i 'in ; , .HI : "^li ' " I1!! i ;">t . ' ;, :» hi/ • m; ,; i: ; 1 1> , :, • inij]!; ' ...... u ,1 ',st ;: ..... ILH ?i , i ' 11 innnniinni!!!1'1!!1!!!!!:!! :^ix. y< ; ?"ii|i ""I't i; t ;! v KAV«\ '& , ^ l!ii;;il iftjIK1!!!!!1 nk ,' • ": |ii, i ..... ;:'",• 3iiiiiniiiF< < ii'Hii1 , i", T"1 ,,<"i: ..... :, ..... Wri't11:1!, 'tw, ":!!"'• f ,,;iii ir* " * i, "Wii.'miJiii iLhi.! ni'i' 'tji;1" ...... j ...... '" ,"• ,iiiini;!i|>!' ^ ...... ,11; t'Vii!" iiniiiiiiiiiinnninuniiiH'!::11',!!!11 , ;v:\ ^ifcniiiiNje riiiiiii:1;!1"1!,;; ' ;, 'iwH,,1'!;: < ,:ii|"ii ..... M,:"!1:!1" ,'i'i, w iniiii KI jfiainiiir, iiiiniiviiifi
^ in;;: .......... <;!ii"'"il iiiii'iiii" M,!'!'!!, "r^:^i: ,,'vmm mm < fi'« ;i ...... :" <9: ii; i:1 ; „! NIMH v, A ' ......... • 't, ' <:i ";„, ' ..... ,;•, ffi^jK!!,:1;.'!!1': « "^Vm i11^1",;11! ,i':" 'V&ir ^ ir.:1":; ...... ;:.iv]«^ • ...... ^ : ^: ..... itii"":1!" ...... :ii< ,;l!':'i"!!:"P"": :i: . :, IB, ':;<|i«^ flr;!^:1
iii IIP ' 'liiiiiiiiii'i;'1 v v\ FT •;•> , iiiili'iiiin ...... :. , , iiiiiii'1 1" . , i , • wi t: ",!5i % ' i^i Si ! ; i; " .liiiiiiiiiiiilii,,' «< iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii ,! : , • i » >, * <:> " ' ii ,; 'iiirii,, • ,:, , ii, ii i1 ni",' ! • |! 'i :i,,': iil ;,i< I' ' »ii 1 Ml|i ii i >! ' !l !| • w ' , " ^ i imi ' ..... i' ''i :« i1 i,,,, i' • " i11 ' 7 i1'1' , • T " i iiiiiii jiii iii n >, !|i iiiiii:; ' liftiii ....... iiiiJn i,!!1 iiiii;i: ' iiiiiii1 ' iiin;;, .viimiii' ',i< • 1 ..... ii-ii' Jiiii i™ i miiri iiii „, i ' ..... iiiiiiiii" lli: :, ii'i1 "^i1! , ' nJiii1 • iiiiii11' >"> ' ' iiiiiiiiiii
Illllliilllillllllllllilllillii li'liiMiilini.!^:!!! lillli!1 '' iiliil'iiilih:!!1 < iliiiiiill'iiiliiio'lii,!;!!1:!' iilliililillllliiillll^lonjiii " I i'liiiaiiiilli1" , i 'lilliliilili liiiii1":^"!11";, ivitfim: I iiiini ..... ,{•', ....... I {'IliliqiRiili'iiiiJIIIiina''! ,, ,"•' Jill',1 ii'ill" '!' ^. ^!iJ ^m, lill;,,11 i!!:" Jf .IJilii!!!!,'::!!!'" ..... " '» iiillliiiiliiiliiiiKiiiliii^iillli'Nil:!!:! ..... iilii''^;!!!^'^!.'':!!!!!!!:;!!! ..... m, *ti 'M iJiiiiiliii'llliliHii^ui^li&i? ^nflilil?1""!
-------
FILE COPY
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON. O.C. 20460
= I J '•-"= 9455.1995(01)
OPF1CE OF
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
Mr. James A. Lassner .
Investment Recovery Manager
40 Rector Street .
New York, NY 10006
Dear Mr. Lassner,
In your January 26, 1995 letter to Mike Shapiro, you asked
whether a vessel transporting a RCRA regulated hazardous waste
requires an EPA identification number for transport between the U.S.
and Belgium.
The answer to your question is no. An EPA identification number
is not required once a waste shipment is outside of U.S., jurisdiction.
For a complete description of RCRA waste export requirements, please-
refer to the code of federal regulations, specifically 40 CFR Part
262, Subpart E-Exports of Hazardous Waste.
If you have any additional questions, please contact Denise
Wright of my staff at (202) 260-3519.
Sincerely,
A* Michael Petruska, Chief
/ Regulatory Development Branch
Printed on Recycled Paper
-------
40 RECTOR STREET • NEW YORK, NY 10006 • (212) 742-1043
•TEUEX: 649566 AWION MTIS NYK FAX (212) 2274028
Via DHL
January 26, 1995
U.S. EPA
Office Of Solid Waste
401 M Street SW
Washington, D.C. 20460
XTTN: Mr. Michael Shapiro
Dear Mr. Shapiro:
' KM: REQUEST' FOR'" WRITTEN
RESPONSE
we woudn
we would appreciate a
and Cara of the SPA RC*A Hotline,
response to the following question!
FACTS: U.S. Generator of an EPA F006/D006 Waste has received
.permission from the EPA to ship the waste to Belgium'.
The Generator must use an EPA Licensed Waste Hauler for
the Inland Portion .(fro« Plant to Port) of the
shipment.
QUESTION: Does the sea going containerline/vessel transporting
f w§§te material from the U.S. Port to the Port of
require an EPA I.D. Number?
Thank you ...... in ........ aavance
your
response
undersigned Sh°Uld hav4 any *«««tions, please contact the
iiiiiti-m"W
, ID '' •
fill! ' Hill
•III
Very truly yours,
AMLON METALS INC:
iii1'-,:;;>(, i1',,1,1;
r^a; ........ ..... i
*******
Hail" •'! „ W'riiiffl1"1 :;:;s!i!i'!ii iwnii I.,'!",: ;":"; Vj'^: < M' i '," <
'..''.'"! 'i Ililrij", H!1"!1 "I1 l!
ft .i,,;1!*!!;.'1 ii11 «lh i ;•!!'',.
t';!'!.,' li,' 'At I* i;,!!l ii! lii;, »„;. IlKiill" t ' '!, **'•, jii, f\ "I '•!,' # \ liilllliijliii T . Iii ii'lin < • i,, Si gjj31, in.. v! "i • :• ,,:,,i EtH" dHi i t, '"I ill" J 'i „ i.. 1|:" J -W iJ L •',! , i,' - 'i: „: li'"I"»! ? III!'1"". ;* ""i: ]ii!ii"'' *' ii;. A i, *& V!^ •! i: S;,, ,,1 • 1 kA 1'" fl „, fl
1, llinilili'ii'i "iHliiilTinffll 'H, «, illllllllBlllllliii^llflllli'i'lllllii'iiiirlli!1! yilinlLi,!„!,: ll!li:l::l!l|Miii:il!iiH!ll"', J'11'* i IS1 fl ShiMOU l,Li,l!,!
-------
HOTLINE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
March 1995
9455.1995(02)
RCRA
2. Export Requirements for
Transportation Through Transit
Countries
A facility generates hazardous waste in
Alaska. The generator arranges to send the
hazardous waste to a disposal facility in
California. In the process of transportation,
the hazardous waste will pass through
Canadian territory. Will the facility be
required to comply with any of the export
regulations found under Part 262, Subpart E?
In this scenario, RCRA export regulations do
not apply. The regulations for exports of
hazardous waste in Part 262, Subpart E apply
to any person who meets the definition of a
primary exporter. Primary exporter is defined
under §262,51 as generally, any person
required to initiate a hazardous waste manifest
which designates a treatment, storage, or
disposal facility in a receiving country.
Receiving country is subsequently defined
under §262.51 as "a foreign country to which
a hazardous waste is sent for the purpose of
treatment, storage or disposal (except short-
term storage incidental to transportation)". In
the above scenario, there are no treatment,
storage, or disposal facilities in a receiving
country that are designated on the manifest,
rather, the waste simply passes through a
foreign country. RCRA does not require that
transit countries be notified.
-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
ill IIIIIillll I Hi i II11 III! I i 111 I i Ml Milli Illlllllll i I I III II III 111 I I III II 11IIII i III I I lilllil I III in II Ililllilll III II n
i
IIill lull1 11 Illlllllll I i" l ('Illllll III 1 i 1 1 Ill 1 (li1 Ill iliiII lilii, i1 "I Ill1, il.ii
-------
Volume 7
Addendum
Place the attached
documents at the end
of the appropriate
Category Number in
Volume 7
-------
Ill II 111 I III IIIIHI
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
•
Ililiilldllllll IllllllK lUnillK rllllHiillriliii (illlira (ilS'lSI IIIIJIIISiiiEsiill rSOillW^ !. IIID-W^^^^^^^^
I 111 11 ll|l
! Hi:, ill1';": Mil M iliiflli: ii:,, M:IIV '' 'Vftll '"I1 'fi: 1,1 A L, "JSPllll'':» pill 1 lii: lliUU'U^^^^^ |l'l" i'k!"'" 'U IlillHII1" I' :l',.'!,? 1' I 11II 111 I II I llillll I I 111 111
lll^
-------
•? 1
* a
•
i
•
• i
; v-
\ji
1.
HOTLINE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Januaryl995 9452.1995(01)
RCRA
2. Manifest Requirements for Imported
Hazardous Waste
Any person who imports hazardous waste
into the United States must comply with all
applicable generator requirements and the
special requirements for importers in Pan 262,
SubpartF(§262.60(a)). This includes
preparing a manifest with a generator EPA
identification number before transporting the
imported hazardous waste within the United
States. Because waste generated in another
country will not have an EPA identification
number, the importer's identification number
should be used on the manifest. Any party who
helped arrange for the importation (e.g., a
broker, a transporter, a TSDF), however, may
be considered an importer (June 25,1985,
memo from Skinner to Seraydarian). Incases
where there is more than one importer, each
with an identification number, whose number'
should be used on the manifest?
EPA does not require any particular
identification number to be used on the
manifest The Agency recommends that the
parties to the movement decide among
themselves who will act as the importer The
importer's responsibility includes providing an
identification number on the manifest
(§262.60(b)( 1)). Regardless of who performs
the importer duties, EPA reserves the right to
enforce against any of the involved parties if
the requirements of the RCRA hazardous
waste regulations are not adequately met.
-------
i>'"'v ,i111'WI'lliBQi iilliliHi'iyillllllllllililiW:'ft'illpi' 'III'II11?iiiii•!'',"I""'jUIIIHIIII'X111 !llllii:!!lllill!liil!!,j|ll!l:i«]lliii|!!d!l|!ll!|l!!>:!l««lill«!ll««!l!!:l«i,!i:i ijnHinEI!;.!!1 ,;i;illl!llllllll!ji|j|ll<:illill!i||||lli:iili!,i;MBH,!:,iil'iliilii!! iilillllllllllllllllil ,'!'ilPJIl)!" IPIM•'l<;!llllliyiillllllllllil!llilll||i|ililllllllllilllll
lllilili1' ft,1, " III.11!:*!!!.!"'!'1 illlll'inilllii:!; III. ifiPillilnll! 111,:;!!!!,!/!!,, "i ':' Illlll i|i' "l<" .III! 1,1111! 'IL'lii "Illilllllilll^iVlllliillhWIilf1! uliliinSillllllllMinillll III1'!,,!: "Illlihil'iUuiJi iJllllinnlJIIIIIIIIUifllir'ri lll'.lfilliilllin'.iillllli,, , .lUniNillfl 'ilfi <\ lIHpLIIII'JIilliinlli!, 'lil'ii'lil'lllHi Jir.ilinilL.'inilllii
N»' IJ' ill!1!," 1, ill!!':!!':'" I ,!!£ M,M\», \ IIIII !! «i, ''! «9A 111' I"H i,« ".fill!!" in^lll'l'l i »ii ;i!"!! J ill, {' < I "9H'' „!!:",, 'fliilli; :>,l :>!::"' £ i '^ .i, iii1:""' iiiiiiiilliiiiiiiiiii < jfait '.i k. l& I :",,:i4' i;' '!i iiiiiliiiiiii, ::ii; i-iijiiiiiiiii::1" i ii!i!iiiiiiii!iii! ii» '^iilniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii'i ^^it* 'i: 'Iiiiiviiniiiii; li|;.'! I1'1;" i:v lit IJif:»:\ filiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii'^1 f i ':::iii!;::i'':nii i'ii'liiiil 'isiliiiiiiiiciiiiiiliiiiiiiiiiiiKi Itiiiiiiiiiiiiiil^iiiiiiiiu;11
^^^ "
M^^ ..... I'i'iflEJlU ....... <">',li :::<
^^^ ...... ' 'li
in' 'i i;iiaiif. ,,IIFI,, "i: .^uiiiiiini;;KA- ,;i .lihi'ini'itiii .:'ii" • :l|"iii T9" i, "'•'
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
'"; i :,:
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
-------
HOTLINE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
March 1995
9462.1995 (02)
RCRA
1. Signing the Manifest as an Agent
When Importing Hazardous Waste
A waste broker in Mexico arranges to
collect hazardous waste from several different
Mexican generators, and exports 1500
kilograms of hazardous waste for disposal at a
US. facility. The RCRA regulations under
Pan 262, Subpart F require an importer to
initiate a manifest when hazardous waste
enters the United States. Since the broker from
Mexico accepts all responsibility for the
hazardous waste from the generator facilities
and handles the hazardous waste for the US.
disposal facility, can the broker sign the.
Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest as an
agent of the US. disposal facility that is
importing the waste?
The regulations for imports of hazardous •
waste allow the importer or his/her agent to
sign the generator certification statement on
the manifest in place of the generator
(§262.60(b)(2)). The only requirement for an
agent signing the manifest is that the agent
must be somehow legally affiliated with the
EPA identification number used on the
manifest The Mexican broker could sign the
manifest certification only if the broker's
company has a U.S. EPA identification
number (requiring a U.S. address) or the
broker is legally related to the importer (e.g., a
subsidiary). A broker signing as an agent
because of a legal relation to the importer
must place the U.S. address and U.S. EPA
identification number of the importer on the
manifest.
-------
Illlllll II II III 111 III 111 111 11111 I lllllll
ill III 111 III I 11 I II III III lllllll lllllll
II I I 111 I III I 111
II III I I III 111 I 111
lllllll 111 Illlllll II 111 I 111 II
II III II I II II I 111 111 111
Illlllll II lllllll
II lllllll lllllll lllllll
lllllll
111 IN lllllll I lllllll
111 I 111 HI lllllll Pill I 111 lllllll IIP III i Illlllll II
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
I lllllll I !!• L
lull1 VI'! ^'l!fi«
I!',;,,; urii'i 'j;, si;1' ; ^v>Miiii:M^ ,,""iii,K'i"i,:' \;••"!,•'',,! » i,: '•,,; • ,: if,1 • LSI,;' '. I,' sNPifc IM*:111';/'! ililOHl't1 • L'liu"tli|i!^lW''!l:l!1|'^ll::l';T',^
Hii,,; ,M ,•*:,»,; .;•, ,•' j. !«„ if' i i ;,.', if' • :v«»::, .M <' i n <<,, n IIIIIPI i":iliiiiin i"iiin v -i1:vaa iHinii
III', '!< ? III. 'K ' 'i,liJI'illFi"1 ,, i?, nllliilllRili": :!JH !i»i,,;;,. JiPiill' iili'.liiiilllli: < I'1'1
/'':';1111!*1**111 , i;i;:ji" ," ' 'ti!"
-------
FILE
i j L. &• w
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
SEP 1 * 1995 9475.1995 (01)
OFFICE OF • '
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
Mr. Donald S. Berry
Goodwin, Procter, and Hoar
Counsellors at Law
Exchange Place
Boston, MA 02109-2881
Dear Mr. Berry:
I am pleased to respond to your August 8, 1995 letter, which requested confirmation - „
that the Environmental Protection Agency's manifest discrepancy requirements would not
apply to certain shipments of waste initiated by one of your clients. *
As related to me in your letter, your client's manufacturing process generates a waste
which exhibits the characteristic of corrosivity. The client ships these wastes to permitted
treatment facilities under manifests which indicate the corrosive characteristic of the •
hazardous waste. However, in some instances, the receiving treatment facility finds that the
pH of the waste has changed, such that it no longer exhibits the RCRA corrosivity
characteristic. According to your letter, one or more of these treatment facilities has
responded to these circumstances by initiating the "manifest discrepancy" procedures
described in 40 CFR sections 264.72 and 265.72 (for interim status facilities), or in
corresponding State regulations. Your letter asks whether these facts were intended to be
covered by the manifest discrepancy requirements.
With respect to the requirements of the Federal regulations, our view is that these
facts need not give rise to the riling of a discrepancy report. Manifest discrepancies are
defined in sections 264.72(a) and 265.72(a) as differences between the quantity or type of
hazardous waste designated on the manifest and the quantity of type of hazardous waste a
facility actually receives. When there is any variation in piece count in a batch shipment, or
a variation of more than 10% by weight in a bulk shipment, the Federal regulations classify
the variation as a significant discrepancy, which must be reconciled with the generator within
15 days of receipt of the waste, or failing that, reported to EPA or the authorized State. See
40 CFR sections 264.72(b) and 265.72(b).
We believe that the manifest discrepancy regulation was intended to cover those
situations where there is in fact a quantity of hazardous waste that is unaccounted for at the
time of receipt. Under the facts described in your letter, there is not really a deviation in the
waste quantity; rather, the quantity of waste identified on the manifest is in fact received,
Rccyeled/Recyelabto
Primed with Soy /Canou Ink on pap*f
eanuina «t K««t S0% Kcydad ttbtr
-------
I IIIIIIIKI
ilililllli
but at Uptime of receipt, does not exhibit the hazardous characteristic. Thus the issue is
really one of waste characterization, ajid not an issue of accountability for the waste
While we believe that this is the better view of the Federal
_ that it is a close h _
exclude those situations where the waste is subsequently shown noTto" be"
and in those cases where the treatment facility does handle the situation as a •
', it would seem that the "discrepancy- would be easily reconciled by a phone call
, if an authorized
^ '"I1"' to addition' if « authorized State « » irp
^ ^solution or reporting under its corresponding regulation
*' ^JS0Uired t0 ""^ ^ "» more ^gentlnte^reS
3009 * 1
* * 1S I*rmissible for authorized states to
wsh to emphasize that your client would appear to be in compliance with the
e
under the hazardous waste manifest. TTie manifest was not intended to act as a
0°" «« * ^Pped materials are indeed hazardous wastes. Tne «gut£n?aw a
generator to characterize its waste based on process knowledge, and it is understood mat
** ^ <™*Ve costs
( ^^ n <}m ill
,,|( lilllJIll Hill1 ,!1 111! I • II "illirilll'l ill".!!: , Ml
'!• li1:",!"}! Sincerely,
!P»!!i 'C ' ''V ..... illlilrih'!''*!11 ''aiir'i'kiviimll'i iB"!i!"5ifii ' ^"g U IfllQ^T
:;:.iin ..... ..... , ...... •'' ......... 'in ........ ur p • ...... • ........ • ..... jn ......... , ,IIH< ...... SS, ............................................. "/
',«!':IIL!" Iliiijulll1!,,:!!!!!!!!1 :|i IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIi:} Til:111 ir '• JilTI'!,,! II'".,,,„ ' i,, ' ,'> Jllii;,,,!' I1', I'llll!,, K JW'N'I;, IfaAI ,11 JTai" IIHIIfll
»i.",iiiM "nil .i'niii. :"i|ti
I; M'l'Li!,, I!* Illlliiill!!!'!1!.!1,,,!'
inr^n
i Hill,,': ihi',1! ii,' llllllil <" ,i,il: i' ' illKliBIL .ill! 1151 in,,,, ',i iiii." I!,:!1 >;Aa 'fl < «: gl 'V ''I!1!' I,: •" Ji»' ''III1,,, i, I", I!1'nil ; ! ]' 1,111 B [• *ii li'lllllllllll Btl1 lull I,' S'lt II, ijim,!:!' '> 'I; I i f mill1 Hi '"'Blii,!,'' iifeR: ,| IN!1 '•'!,»I'lillin
ill 1'fS i'siiilifjiiiwiSiiiiiii «;•:::! T: l:1:: ;is:::,"::: Ti-s'
i1:,;. ii'ii"'/"/.!'!' iriunii,ii,ni,iiii,' 'Jinn ":'. w.wMi!,
iinii, i,i,,,i, ,ii,,i i,i' Hii'iiiiip,iiiiinii|
|^^^ ' .
-------
«"*«'
I .'^
GOODWIN, PROCTER & HOAR
A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS
COUNSELLORS AT LAW
EXCHANGE PLACE
BOSTON". MASSACHUSETTS oaios-assi
TELEPHONE <€I7> 57O-IOCO
TELECOPIER'6171 237-8591
DONALDS.BERRY.P C " CABLE • GOOOPROCT. BOSTON
(617)570-1344
August 8,1995
Mr. Michael J. Petruska
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Regulatory Development Branch
401 M Street, S.W.
Washington, DC 20460
Re: Application of Hazardous Waste Manifest Discrepancy Requirements to
Certain Waste Shipments
Dear Mr. Petruska:
This letter is submitted to seek confirmation that EPA would consider the hazardous
waste manifest discrepancy requirements set forth at 40 C.F.R. §§ 264.72 and 265.72 not to '
apply to certain shipments of waste generated by our client as described below.
As you and I recently discussed, this firm represents a company whose manufacturing
process generates ™«g^ ^fairing the characteristic of corrosivity. These wastes do not exhibit
any other hazardouTwastecharacteristic and do not constitute listed hazardous wastes. The
wastes are shipped from the generating facility to licensed hazardous waste treatment facilities
located in a number of states, and the manifests for the wastes are properly completed to indicate
• that the wastes gr» ™rr™iw In some cases, by the time the wastes reach the treatment tacilityT"
/ their pH has changed and they no longer exhibit the corrosivity characteristic. As a result, the
' :treatment facility concludes that there is a difference between the type or waste designated on the
manifest and the type of waste actually received, and the facility then submits a discrepancy
• report under the aforementioned regulations or the parallel state regulations.
Sections 264.72 and 265.72 refer to discrepancies between the quantity or type of
hazardous waste designated and the quantity or type of hazardous waste received. Based on or
discussion, it is my understanding that EPA would consider these provisions to be inapphcab'
where the waste shipments, as described above, no longer constitute hazardous waste. As a
result, the filing of a discrepancy report would not be appropriate, and the treatment facili'
receives the waste either could sign and return the manifest to indicate receipt of the shir
could take no action with respect to the manifest. It is also my understanding that EP/
consider our client's designation of the above-described wastes as corrosive to const)
-------
4
'* '
**• !
1 '"•* i •
:: .: ::..: ::: ;:: :::.::.::.:.G..QQOWIN, PROCTER' & HOAR ' '
Mr, Michael J. Petruska
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
August 8,1995
Page 3
I
I,
Compliance with the manifest requirements for hazardous waste generators as set forth at 40
C.F.R. _§_§,.262._20-262.23 because such designation is accurate at the time the waste is shipped
from the site of generation.
II 111 I III 11 I II II I II II lillllll III! II III III I VI ,
i mini mi 11 n i in i n inn i 111111111111111 nun n i mil in n ninnnnnnnninn n i nnnnninnnlin i mi i in i mini in i n inn limn nun n i in in n i in i n i inn u in i i mi i HI inn in n mi in n n i in i m n i i i in 11 i n
I IH2SM a,PPreciate il if y°u could provide me with written confirmation that the foregoing
f§ EPA's j/osition on this issue and that no further recordkeeping or reporting is required in such
a situation. Please call me at 617-570-1344 if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Thank you very much for your assistance.
Very truly yours,
Donald S. Berry, P.C.
I!7233.bl
-------
HOTLINE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
October1995
9475.1995 (02)
RCRA
1. Location of Operating Records at
Treatment, Storage, and Disposal
Facilities
The owner or operator of each hazardous
waste treatment, storage, or disposal facility
(TSDF) must keep a written operating record
at the facility. This record retention
requirement applies to both facilities
operating under permits and facilities
qualifying for interim status (40 CFR §§2641 '
265.73). The operating record must include a
significant number of records ranging from
waste analysis results to closure cost
estimates to tank integrity assessment records.
Must TSDF owner/operators maintain all of
the different documents making up the
operating record in one central location?
No, the federal RCRA regulations do not
require owner/operators of hazardous waste
TSDFs to maintain all of the documents
making up the operating record in one
designated area. Compliance with the
operating record requirements of §§264/
265.73 demands only that the specified
information be maintained on site at the
facility; other records can be kept at remote
locations. In addition, for the records that
must be kept on site, the various documents
making up the operating record need not be
consolidated in one office as long as they are
available for review somewhere on the facility
grounds (this might be more practical in the
case of a large facility with multiple
buildings). In order to improve accessibility
to and control over these key documents,
however, EPA recommends that, where
possible, all of the contents of the operating
record be retained in a central area under the
supervision of one designated individual.
-------
IIP i l.lllllllini'TSiiiiirniili'lHIi: illDJiii '- T\ \\l\l\lf\ IP, I"!!,' M1''"ili'lilKllilll.UJiK, 'JJIIHIIIIIIIIIIIIIBT!! 'IJI
mill1!:*,!1 lit'''I'Ljriiiiiiiiiiii.iii ,i,nip::'iiii,i|iipi," ii,:1 ji/riii,,, ,•;',, MM m-' w ,1 xui1 'ii'iiiiii^'iLiiJiiiiE'iHniiv r ^fliiisifiBi''!'^!^'''!.!!*;:!!, iiiiiiiii^fnioj'iriiNiii UEimn 'i iHPiiiBW'i' nn11 "i^iiKiiiit1;!!1
&K il-fll^^^^^ lf,iiiim ill) ii!
|i, ''iillililhi11 ,i II l|llllllllllllil!jlli|ill!liii|iri IP, IP .'IGli'llLIPIIIiliiillff'''!!.^^!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" 1 1IIIIIIIIPIIIIIIIIIH! fill III" Hill!!'I" ili'nllliilP'iliililllliPlil'lliii'illiEi'l.iliniliJIIllililli.llihllPPiiii'Ji:;! Illl
nillilll n lillllllim.in'li' li1 i''T, I llvPililn IxrilillllllKllliilJIIILIil < Illl'l i «p ft! 'IBIK"!!, h, i' i. M jllliii'll'llilili:!1 ' iJ11 ' i'i'|l|.|!l|i'., i "1,! P'
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
i
nil
-------
\ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
' • 9482.1995(01)
JUH301995
OFFICE Of .
SOLD WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
William C. Hopper .
Industrial Hygienist ." . • .
Brown & Davis, Incorporated . • .
1201 Main Street, Suite 1915
Columbia, SC 29201 . - . ' ;
Dear Mr. Hopper: :.'.., •
This is in response5to your May 30, 1995 letter requesting.
clarification of regulatory language with -respect to permitted -
hazardous waste container storage facilities. You specifically
request clarification regarding the term "sufficiently . .
impervious", as it occurs in 40 CFR 264.175(b)(1), and ask
whether coatings, and liners are required in conjunction with
concrete containment pads. - . . • .
, A . ••
The regulations at Section 264.175 address containment
• requirements for container storage areas only. Specifically,
§264 175(b) addresses the design and operational requirements for
containment systems, and requires that container storage areas
consist of a base underlying the "containers which is free of
cracks or gaps and is sufficiently impervious to contain leaks,
spills, and accumulated precipitation until the collected
material is detected and removed." There is no specific
definition of "sufficiently impervious" with respect to container
storage areas provided in the regulations, and there is no
mention that liners or coatings .must be used with concrete pads.
However, the intent of "suf-ficiently impervious" may be
understood by considering preamble language from the January 12,
1981 rule (46 JEE 2802). Specifically, at 46 IS 2829, the Agency
states that bases underlying containers be "constructed of
concrete or asphalt but latitude has been incorporated to allow
for other materials of construction." Further, ^the important
consideration is that the containment system in its entirety be
capable of collecting and holding escaped wastes and contaminated
precipitation." The container storage regulations also require
that the base must be sloped or the system must be designed so
that -liquids resulting from releases can drain and be removed,
and that any waste that has spilled or leaked into the secondary
containment area, or any accumulated precipitation, must be
removed in a timely manner. . .
Racyctod/Racydabto
MnM wtm Soy/Cmon Wt en p*p«r th«
contrfm cttoMt 50% raeycM Bb«r
-------
• I
4 I! llllllH INI ••illllll Him*
i i11 iimi IIP i in, ill ii
I'll Fill if •
Yourlettermentions that certain policy correspondence
regarding surface impoundments and waste .piles indicated that
colicret:! is not considered sufficiently impervious. Those
statements addressed the appropriate materials for primary
containment units are that are designed to operate in direct
continuouscontact with hazardous waste. This is fundamentally
different than the question you ask regarding a container storage
area where .the concrete.pad functions as a secondary containment
device to catch any spillage of hazardous waste in the event of
colltainer failure. • The container provides the primary
.containment, while tEe concrete ^ase provides the secondary
containment. .. >
Finally/ although the regulations at §264.175 do not
specificaliy require a liner or coating to be used in conjunction
a i£gs£r1g£s base£ States may. have more stringent requirements
contaTni'ig'" storage "areas ~, as deemed necessary to' protect 'human
and the environment.. For site-specific requirements, you
iSntact 'the appropriate state "regulatory agency.' If you
have any further questions, please call Jeff Gaines of my staff
at (703) 308-8655.
IllllilH li|
iilllilllllil lllllllliiiliiii Illllii lull
Illllll1 1IIII11
iiiii linn in »i in iiiiiii UNI
iiiiiii i iiiii iiiiiiiiiiii i .
|| I II IIP11! 'I'll11 ill - .
Sincerely,
\ '
Frank McAlister, Chief
Permits Branch (5303H)
Office of Solid Waste
cc:
Matt Hale, OSW
Jim, Michael, OSW . ' .
Jeff Gaines7 ................... OSW ......................................... . ..............................
Ross, ................. S,2.1iott , OSW
Brian Grant, OGC
G. Alan Farmer, Region IV
iiiiiiii iiiiiii mi Him
r in ill
linn i iiiii i ii ii i iiiii
-------
Brown & Davis, Inc.
1201 Main Street, Suite 1915
i Phone: (803) 748-1226 • Fax (803) 748-1288
May 30,1995 :
Columbia, S.C. 29201
i Sylvia K.Lo\
.Office of$eM3 Waste
United'Slates Environmental Protection Agency (USBPA)
agton, D.C. 20460
Dear Mrs. Lowrance, . ... ' , --y
I am writing you in regards to the .container "storage standards for permitted
facilities as specified in Part 264, Subpart I in title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
Specifically,.! am confused about the-words "sufficiently impervious" found in 264.175
(bXD- My understanding as to the meaning of the word impervious is. that it means.
something that is incapable of being penetrated, or incapable of being affected. This
would indicate to me that containment -for.a storage area used to store liquid volatile
organics would require an .impervious coating or liner. ,In addition, the Sept 2,1988
Federal Register, which discusses the containment requirements for "new*? tanks systems,
states that concrete is not sufficiently impervio'us. Also, several'policy letters I have read
regarding waste piles and surface impoundments also state that concrete is not
sufficiently impervious. Are permitted container storage areas required to have coating
or liner covering over a concreted pad? If so, is this a requirement"in every case.or only
under certain circumstances? . s / . • .. •
I appreciate your time and effort in providing me with assistance regarding this
matter. If need be, I can be reached at (803) 748-1226.
William C. Hopper
Industrial Hygienist
-------
Ill lllllll I I 111 II III 111 II Illlllll 111 I I II III 111
•1 i in in iiiiiiii in iiiiiii 11 in i in i i ii ii i iii I in i iiiiinii i i
i in ill ii n in 11
J
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
-------
Volume 9
Addendum
Place the attached
documents at the end
of the appropriate
Category Number in
Volume 9
-------
'iltmSi'ili'i ! EL " 'S llilli : I 'M •;,' (IIIKii.. :!L><,l,!lIf l!f!l I: IsJIIIIIillli>'..I'lllll'' Iff: WWKi':'•• 'llli'V!.1'' '''IK:!!1;.!:'!., !•'•niili'' it) II c"'-!!!.1:':' I'1 li!''I r 1::i illlll,jll i Jll'Kii1:inlii"''!!!! 1
ll 111 I I 111
fbis Page Intentionally Left Blank
*! ii iliNlio'irnllli ' I1' Hit I,"1 ii'illl'l ..... !' ill'i'iill! 'I1,:1'"!'"' , iiiV.1"1 ...... V, '«! 'h!' i!M|!'.Sn ..... ":,ii 'HI: ,!n'ii,,t,ill ...... ;: tf" .....
'"I fill1 'ii'Hi'llii " „ ....... ,
i '",iill'ti, I"'!'1 ''i
:' < 'ff ^ !. 9 ' !,«>, ,:,?t «: i
ll^ Yi'Slili ,!i' Juliif
i1.;1,!, i /, I'liilM i .AliBIJ'r.lUIVI'Ui! !,i'!ll!il""!!'lil"'.:,, Vilillill'L''!,: I'
&'i'ii ''ilii'V1'1^" V^llW'i'!' iM'l'iMiWiii, ..... INi!1'" ^nLliiii1':!1'11; '"'
lip!,!" ..... fli/TliillllVMIilllll
iiiiiiiii'iiLii'ii'iiinii iiiiiiiiini''''.'/'''.'^./!!!!!
r ; is "'1 • r "\ (
^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ...... «', iiilllll .lil'.- , lilllll! t 'lii1!- it'lli.v1
iiiji ..... ": i . iii!niiii .m ...... 'jiiii': : ,
^11 ..... ^l!^^!'.,1:ilfi6*';1^^i;^^:
' ' lifi ''?$'". 'If^m'* ':;lf ; II ? • ;• e^f£ $&• if;!* f«! ' I? Wb iiSs ..... liiii1 ' ! Hftfrv!^ ilii 'iiii; x-S-i :VMML ' ": '» •' :«•* •' ^WP llsi1';.- liliiii
:illi|lll. ..... ";;i,'i||ll ...... '.:£l ..... : iti-ji''!^!/!!',)!;! IlKJIililC ', ;, "{;•>} '.ft ''"f:'ffJ'St''n -<; Irl11!"1!"!'!*!'':-1'!!'::'!"1 "ilIillHI ..... ' 'll'WIIfi" JKiEi ' !! 'ilBiin^^^^ HIS"' '""ii1"1! ....... l"!:l ....... ilMi j':v 'Mlii'l ...... I1!, ' • i -, •• 'I iVi-I'li: III fffOlt: I' flit ', MIMM
, : iiiiiii I-: ,! ..... ' 'IK:-! .......... iiiiiiiiiii'i in ' •" FT o 'ill ' ..... i, '•:! , • it i ill ':::• nsi':-iti< f" ..... '">, t? ", •* «ti w:":^'! • t: M f:± 5':f WR > tiiiiiif IIIIIFIIIIIIII>' ..... i^^uvb'-''!!']! IT I'lu ;~i ..... if1 "i"'i oiiiiL'i'i.M !•' i.i i'"'
-------
HOTLINE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
January 1995 9437.1995 (01)
RCRA
1. The Liquids in Landfills Prohibition
and Sorbed Free Liquids
EPA prohibits the direct placement in a
hazardous waste landfill of liquid hazardous
waste or hazardous waste containing free
liquids (40 CFR §§264/265 314(b)). The
Agency also prohibits the placement in a
hazardous waste landfill of containers holding
free liquids, except for lab packs, very small
containers (i.e., ampules) and containers
designed to hold free liquids for use other .
than storage (i.e., batteries) (§2643I4(d)(2),
(3), and (4) and §265314(c)(2), (3), and (4)).
On November 18,1992 (57 ££ 54454), the
Agency retained the Paint Filter Liquids Test
(PFT) as the required test to determine if
hazardous wastes hold free liquids. If the PFT
demonstrates that a waste to which sorbents
have been added.no longer contains free
liquids, may the waste be placed in a landfill,
or is additional treatment required?
EPA's criteria for the use of sorbents to
treat wastes containing free liquids vary
according to whether the wastes will be .
disposed of directly or will be placed in a
container prior to disposal. EPA allows the
use of sorbents to remove free liquids from
"containerized" wastes. If the PFT
demonstrates that a containerized waste to .
which sorbents have been added contains no
free liquids, the waste may be disposed of in a
hazardous waste landfill (40 CFR
§264.314(d)(l)(ii) and §265.314(c)(l)(ii)),
provided that it meets all applicable land
disposal restriction (LDR) treatment
standards. As a precaution against the use of
inadequate sorbents, EPA regulations require
that sorbents used to Teat free liquids prior to
land disposal be nonbiodegradeable (40 CFR •
§264.314(e) and §265.314(f)).
EPA .prohibits the use of sorbents to treat
liquid hazardous waste or hazardous waste
containing free liquids that will be disposed of
directly (e.g., without first being placed in a
container) in a landfill Free liquids in such
"bulk or noncontainerized" hazardous wastes
must be "chemically, thermally, physically, or
biologically treated without the use of
absorbents" before the wastes may be
landfilled (OSWER Directive #9487.00-2A).
To demonstrate that chemical stabilization
rather than absorption or adsorption is
occurring, the bulk or noncontainerized
hazardous wastes should undergo an indirect
chemical stabilization test (also known as an
unconflned compressive strength test). The
indirect chemical stabilization test ensures
that, prior to direct disposal, liquid hazardous
wastes or hazardous wastes containing free
liquids wastes have been adequately treated
through some means other than the addition of
sorbents.
-------
I ' . . - • .. . I . . . , J .. , ,
iiiiiS^^^ Sir iliiXH";! us '•, - liiii J'Sk' fJiHld" 'iiSitv J iiii i \ • IK 'l;"fim '?";{ii" i?" 'ii i,i' ,«•!'' H 'i1 '"'i" S ii*"!, !J!f»" •!. ' i •u: "I: ;„> ,'ii': • Hi i'!li 'ii I1; .* ^iBiii?11! "li» IS"':" ^^'"iWill i '>'•$ i-! :'-i" -I !•• 3* 1?TH '' 11:' S; 'I1!"!'! iMIiKIiiEBi Mf'5
,j ]vH-|:l'|JS!'"",:;'; ' •' IIj t«!' f :{ft^lE>| MK: 1 JIB . •!»>';",;» '1;^^; .j';1'!;!,":-'""I 'M'i ':,-;:i i""f S;
"iiii: iiiiit'', '•":;? i" "iiiSiii ': J j . iiiii'i ii" wljiij; ieS"' Iiiiiii';: i::iiiiiil , ••i"1!- •'. :' ',r' n :S3 i1 w 3 .> / •.! '•;::","' •,'>:. liii i i,' i;1''. Ti;'-. i!. ijiiE "•, • ?..;';,,, iiiiiJ-K i,, 'iiifi.,!:;, ii" ',;."; '..ii'S;} ii •'::]"'..' •' ;i* r'.; si .''i \ 'ift .' i' - *."'; ;';i"i iiiisi' 'K'imi my ;.
I ;
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
fin i n n i
III 111 111 III Illlill '"li" ' i I'll |1 Ii "I Ill i ! til I 'Ml ! Illlllllllll II Ii i Mil III HI I Hi1111 I in ' III) l< III 111
I II III Illlill III Illlllllllll I I I IIII I I I III II II I I I I III II I I I IIII
-------
• ...•
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
.". .' WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 '! .
' '" '
9489.1995(01)
JAN 30
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY '• ' ' '
x ..... -.-RESPONSE .. • - • ' ' '
Mr. John-M. Smith,'Director ' ''• . .--. ":•••• .' .'.,':' ..; c.\.-
Alabama Department of Environmental. Management , ,.
P.O. BOX 201643 •'' : ' . - ... .
Montgomery, AI, 36130-1463 . . , .'• •'. -;.;.
Dear Mr. Smith i-f\ . ' - ••• .. '" ; •:' I- _ •- . •••. .;::../;; *•*•:•, ":-:^ ^:;-,; .";'• -.."r-
"The purpose of this letter-is'to respond to ^-in^iy ftom,
the Alabama Department of Environmental Management CADEM), on the
U.S. Environmental.Protection.Agency•s (EPA-s).position regarding,-
the inclusion of emissions from .open burning/open^ detonation ,
(OB/OD) units at -the Annistbn Army Depot in the.,heal«i risjc
assessment for'the Anniston Chemical Agent Disposal Facility..,
'on May 5, 1994, the .Office .of Solid Waste .transmitted the
latest revision to the implementation .guidance for conducting risk
assessments at RCRA hazardous waste combustion units,.^In the
revised guidance EPA ' stated that, the . analysis iof^ risks^ ^fjom
combustion units burning hazardous waste should ideally address air
emissions from all sources, that are an integral, part of--the
combustion . operation, including- activities such as .storage,
blending, and handling of wastes fed to the combustion unit itself,
as.well as storage and handling of combustion residues. ;
After discussions with ADE1I staff, we.-have, -reached the'-
-conclusion that the'OB/OD units at the Anniston Army-Depot are not
an integral part of the combustion .operation-associated with the
planned chemical agent disposal facility, nor are they the typeof
activity, we would expect the health risk assessment.to address.
Therefore, in our view, the emissions from these units ;do not need
to be included in the health risk assessment for the chemical agent :
disposal facility. Risks associated from the.operation, of OB/OD
units would be addressed during the permitting process for these
• -..units. ' •-' ••'• . ' '• ." .:' •'"''•'''"...'.,; •
oenttfm at MMt 50% meyeted fiber
-------
- 2 -
,you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact
James Michael of my staff at (703) 308-8610.
Sincerely,
Michael H. Shapiro, Director
Office of Solid Waste
cc:
I *'
Gerald Hardy, State of Alabama
James Michael, PSPD, OSW.
i1 IP iiii mi1 ill 11'i i
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY '
. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
9489.1995(02)
AUG021995
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
Donald T. Robertson, PhD
Delphi Research, Incorporated
701 Haines Avenue, ttw
Albuquerque, MM 87102
Dear Dr. Robertson:
•
SEjo^t.SaKLTS^SSr WS&83S£JSir'*'"
".
•
o
Printed on Recycled Paper
-------
IlillllH III Illlllllllllllllll 111 II 111 IIIIIIII II
i iiiiiii n iiiiiiii iiiiiii in ii
!«l II"1' I'll" i* because West Virginia is not authorized for Subpart X permitting,
! you would need to contact the EPA-Region III office in
"•^liladelphia, PA regarding the permitting requirements.
r * » i
Again, thank you for your request; If you have any
questions, please call me at (703) 308-8655.
I I jl I
Sincerely,
III .....
[[[
•ii iiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiii
lilllll IIIIIII iMIlllH IIIIIIIIIIIIII II |l|ii,|||ll|ilP||i||, ill niNI Illlllllllllllllll' *•*• jr ~^f~ -•'
Jeffrey T2. Gaines, Environmental Scientist
Disposal.Technology Section (5303W)
Office of Solid Waste
i [[[
cc: Frank McAlister, OSW
Jim Michael, OSW
Sonya Sasseville, OSW
Jim Cummings, TIO
i ''Mary Beck, Region III
I f12^?*! ? 5**5**i Writers' Workgroup, Regions I-ll, IV-X
m
il 'I," ' P^ ; ' : T!! Ill, 91 ''ffiillllf'-lir'ilD,; l:]'1!!' rl, .'.Pili,1 ..... Iv'!; ..... V "I iilligillllllliM" VSKf lifilllllliilli^dll'lllllllillllllllill!1: ;'
?iw.; ..... .'ir
HiraiEllI.!'!!!.! mint'''!™!'!' "'"'I'llJllllllliiui1! [illillFlli •'
^six ...... ' ' ..... m .....
iliiLiMllill^ JT'liii'jLuii ....... , ............ ,<, ................ > ,<»! ' ,IM , ........ i« ,, „< ........ , ............. ............... I ...... ...... mi",, ................ ; ...........
iniLllmllilli^ ..... I1 ilh, inn: IlillliMi; ,|l,,
JBRjjWHIi
iiiiiii p a; „,,!'! iii,>, i
llli ..... iiWIHiiilHi'i!1"1 ; I1*,!!!,],1!1 "i!' ..... 3 t:> I
"iKihi'i'iiKffiiiiiii''' • ;; ,j '• vfcTisFit'.i.i'iLJiMU1
'^ ,, ::!iil!ii|!il' ', K ^'I'F !'; IIKIIIL; i ''ijiirjlll' ,!:'< " ,|v „,!,„ !: : • !: \ , "i :i ....... V ' ',:
i •» :!;"' 'iiii "! " ' >!' / ! . fHi " Ililli Hi!/ il4ii!iil!:!liiiii;iii!l;i!
-------
HOTLINE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
9497.1995(01)
June 1995
RCRA
3. Spent Lead-Acid Batteries and .
Counting Requirements
EPA promulgated specific requirements for
counting hazardous wastes to facilitate
accurate determination of monthly generator
status. While most hazardous wastes produced
at generator sites are counted in the monthly
quantity determination, some special
hazardous wastes are exempt from this
requirement (§261 S(c)). If a generator is
accumulating spent lead-acid batteries that
will be sent for reclamation, should the
batteries be counted towards the determination
of monthly generator status?
Spent lead-acid batteries that will be sent
for reclamation are not subject to the monthly •
generator counting requirements. Hazardous
waste is counted only if it is subject to
substantive regulation (40 CFR §261.5(c)).
Substantive regulations are those regulations
which directly relate to the storage,
transportation, treatment, or disposal of
hazardous waste (51 FR 10152; March 24,
1986). Persons, who generate, transport, or
store spent lead-acid batteries destined for
reclamation, but who do not reclaim them
themselves, are not subject to substantive
regulation, specifically Parts 262-266,270 or
124 (40 CFR §266.80). Therefore, spent lead-
acid batteries destined for reclamation are not
counted when determining mo'nthly generator
status. Such wastes should not be counted
because they are not subject to regulation in
the hands of the generator (50 EB. 14218;
April 11,1985).
-------
'iis! •mi1;rit ,n gniii ;:»,,, /miii , ••ail v Ai,,nn,,! r wam/"'iiHiiiniiiiw|J,j illinium: •'iiiiinn i1':, ma:''»-n"!fi1 f":i: K ;, n fliniin :" EIIKIIww»»„.
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460
NOV 9 1995 9498.1995(01)
gesSeii? *<— ~Hs5~
Ino-
Illinois 60140
Dear Mr. Gossman:
*
us tat °ctober 9' «»5. letter
3S=S
volatility r^
surrogate for berlii '"' c""0^™) as a
source ray exceed th Blite. t
-------
:
Sincerely,
inn11 iiiiniiiiiJ'ii ' i "iiiwi ..... i • ,iii< ;< Kiiiiii ' ! ;;' J neimi : ijvi ' ' ™ n< i1 11: • : ..... ,,i ffii'j in; iiii'iiiiiiiiiiK' "i :i aiiiiiiinii'" i tiii ..... « i1;:1" in: ;, ai,:,""1! ..... ,11 'i :' " .: : iiinin < «i!i»ia! i ii°; ' "'' i T'Sii! : ^i » ...... \v\t : ;s ..... it: "< mimiihi i , :»L • ?, >,; ...... i; * 'wiiiH'' ; s sa -i , • ;i ;ii i:; ' : ^i1:^1 r ' ' ;; ii: rUi^ P., ' i1, < < , :" :|>:|;!<" ,t i?1 ",i; ; • » • lifsn • is ' . iii
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
9498.1995 (02)
. OFRCEOF
SOLD WASTE AND EMERGENCY
. RESPONSE
Mr. Paul C. Chrostowski, Ph.D. .
Principal .-'•-. '. . .
The Weinberg Group Inc.
1220 Nineteenth Street, N.W.
Suite 300 . .
Washington, D.C. 20036-2400 .
Dear Mr. Chrostowski: ;•'
•
Thank you for your letter of November 6; 1995 to "„ •
Administrator Browner regarding your concerns about the Agency1 s *
policy with respect to site-specific risk assessments at
combustion facilities that are regulated under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). I appreciate your detailed
comments that outline the advantageous aspects of site-specific
risk assessments and that support the continuation of site-
specific risk assessments to help ensure that RCRA permits are
protective and are credible with the public and the regulated
community. -
As part of the Agency's Hazardous Waste Minimization and
Combustion Strategy, EPA currently has a national RCRA policy
of strongly recommending to all federal and state RCRA permit
writers that, under the omnibus permit provisions of RCRA
§3005(c)(3), site-specific risk assessments be performed as part
of the RCRA permitting process if necessary to protect human
health and.the environment. Very soon, the Agency intends to
propose new emission standards for hazardous waste combustors
under joint authority of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 and
RCRA. We believe these new standards will provide a significant
improvement over current controls for hazardous waste combustion.
However, at least until these rules take effect, the Agency
intends to continue its policy pf recommending that site-specific
risk assessments be conducted as part of RCRA permitting for
hazardous waste combustors (incinerators, boilers, and industrial
furnaces alike) as necessary to protect human health and the
environment.
Recyctod/Recydabt*
Printed with Sey/CvwU We en p*p«r ttmt
contain* «t tantSO* rteyeMd ebw
-------
Of course, we cannot predict what the final regulations and
, "the final national emission standards will be because we expect
111 substantial comment on the proposal. In that proposal,'we are.
inviting comments specifically on the issue of the role that
site-specific risk assessments ought to play in permitting of
hazardous waste combustion facilities. Your letter will be
• entered into the rulemaking docket,' and if you have further
views, we urge you to submit .them during the public comment
I period, so that they get.full consideration. Our ultimate goal is
. to be able to implement a set of protective national standards
that do not require intensive site-specific assessments at a
large majority of sites. However, we also recognize that there
may be situations in which a need for risk assessments at some
• combustion facilities will continue to exist. These andrelated
issues will be assessed as the Agency develops its final*
rulemaking for hazardous waste combustors. . .; /
Thank you for your interest in this important matter.
i ' „,,,,,, „ ,,,
in i in III in iini i iiiiin»iiiiiiiniiiiii hiiiiiiipii U1,,1,ii 'iiiiiiiiiiii'i iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiinnniiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii'iiiiiiiliiiii i nil ni i nun iiinnnn n iiiinii mi in in in i i n in i mi inn in in mi i in 11 in n i i n mi i n mi inn inn mi i in iiinnnnniiniiii niiiniiiininniiiiiiininnnnniniii *
Sincerely yours, .
Michael Shapiro, Director
Office of Solid Waste
I! liBlillll-i '' !iii Hi! • 'ill', •" Kit S L i IS': !!:<•: if' I illllli illi ' 1I -£.:".: '.i !;;""!! Mlil'IBf "! ill
-------
THE WEINBERG GROUP INC.
WASHINGTON, DC • BRUSSELS
November 6,1995
The Honorable Ms. Carol Browner .. ... -. .
Administrator " . . - . .
United States EnvironmeiQtai Protection Agency ' .".•
401 M Street, SW ; ' '. . . . N ' -
Mail Code 1101 - ' '. . •:., .
Washington, P.C. 20460 / . . • . ^ .
Dear Ms. Browner. . . • .'.„'' -
• • • • '"" * * .
The purpose of this letter is to comment on title Environmental Protection Agency's (EP A's) "•:
proposal to eliminate requirements for site-specific risk assessments at combustion facilities that
are regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RQlA). Although the
performance of direct and indirect risk assessments at these facilities by EPA, state agencies or
project proponents has gotten off to somewhat of a rocky start, mere is little logic to abandoning
a program that is now reaching an acceptable degree of maturity. Indeed, as both regulators and
the regulated community become more adept at producing and reviewing risk assessments, their
utility as a regulatory tool proportionately increases. Some of the more important reasons for
continuing the program include: • .. :.
• Emissions associated with the implementation of Maximum Achievable Control
Technology (MACT) may not be controlled adequately to meet risk management goals.
This is due to a number of reasons including the uniqueness of site-specific exposure
pathways and the inability of MACT standards to control facility-specific chemical' .
standards. The possibility that MACT might not be protective was, in fact, the reason
behind the residual risk requirements of §112(f) of the Clean Air Act^Amendments of
1990. We have already seen several instances where propbs^ MACT
meet typical EPA risk management, goals and are concerned that elimination of risk
assessments will reduce the Agency's credibility to both the public and regulated
community. . - . ; ' .
• The elimination of risk assessments will be an impediment to unplementation of some
- key Clinton Administration environmental initiatives including environmental justice and
the assessment of risks to children. Implementation of MACT standards without risk
assessment will not enable the identification of disparate impacts to various sectors of the
community, nor will it assist in the evaluation of cumulative .impacts. . • .-
122O Nineteen* Street. NW • Suite 30O • Washington DC 20O36-24OO • (2O2) 833-8077 • Fax'(202) 833-7O57
-------
The Honorable-Ms. Carol Browner '•• ' ' ,
Pag^'2 •' • -; . "' ;"'"' Y'^-
-------
Volume 10
Addendum
Place the attached
documents at the end
of the appropriate
Category Number in
Volume 10
-------
II (11 IIP
(111(11 III I! llillllllillllllllllil II11 i||iilllilliiilill I HIM III! Ill
•ill II II) l
! I I ill I ( ill III11 II Iil f
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
n 11 n n
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
FEB 17 :S95 ^ 9502.1995(01)
OFFICE OF
SOUO WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: CAMU at U.S.S. Lead Facility
FROM: Devereaux Barnes, DirectorZEflBaon—*
Permits and State Programs Division, OSW
TO: Norm Uiedergang, Director . ..
Office of RCRA,'. Region V . '
V
Recently we have had several discussions with your staff
regarding the approval of a corrective action management unit
(CAMU) at the U.S.S. Lead Refinery facility in East Chicago,
Indiana. In those discussions we were asked to provide the
Agency's position on the specific question of whether a §3008(h)
enforcement order is an appropriate'mechanism for approving a
CAMU at this facility. As you know, interim status for this
facility was terminated under the provisions of RCRA §3005 (e) .
It is the Agency's position that §3008(h) orders are an
appropriate mechanism for approval of CAMUs at facilities that
have lost interim status pursuant to §3005(e). Other types of
hazardous waste management units' (e.g., tanks, piles) that may be
needed to implement remedial actions at facilities like U.S.S.
Lead may also be approved under §3008(h) orders. This
interpretation of the scope of §3008(h) authority is supported by
the broad language of §3008(h) (providing for "corrective action
or such other response measure as...necessary to protect human
health or the environment11) . The legislative history supports
this interpretation in that the conference report indicates that
the intent was to allow EPA to address ongoing problems without a
permit. In addition, EPA's longstanding interpretation is that
§3008(h) applies to LOIS facilities as well as facilities that
are currently operating under interim status, and the CAMU rule
itself imposes no limits on this interpretation. See memo from
J. Winston Porter, "Intepretation of Section 3008 (h) of the Solid
Waste Disposal Act" -(Dec. 16, 1985).
We believe that this is a reasonable reading of the statute.
Based on this interpretation, RCRA permits are not necessary for
such units as long as they are part of the selected remedy (or
interim measure), and they are specifically authorized under the
§3008(h) order. Furthermore, we believe that from a policy
Racycted/HecycUble
PiMed wtth SoyfCuwta Ink en paper that
conttfM it (cut 50% recycled flber
-------
• J f
perspective, permits would generally be inappropriate in these
circumstances, since they would likely have the effect of
delaying cleanup and adding to procedural costs without
increasing environmental protection. As explained in the
preamble to the CAMU rule (58 PR 8676, February 16, 1993), public
participation procedures similar to those for Class III permit
modifications should be followed in approving CAMUs under
§3008(h) corrective action orders.
I : N ;
If you or your staff have more specific questions about the
use of orders to approve CAMUs and other types of units, you may
wish to 'contact Barbara Pace in the Office of General Counsel, at
(202) 26¥-77137 or jjave fagan of my staff at (703) 308-8620.
Please, let us know if we can be of any further assistance.
cc: Jog Boyle
I Kevin Pierard
Barbara Pace ' ,
Carry Starfield
-------
HOTLINE QUESTIONSANp.ANSWERS
. '" ...--•-.. ; 9502.1995(02)
February 1995 •
RCRA
:.2. Corrective Action Authorities. ; ,
RCRA §3004(u) requires corrective action
for all releases of hazardous.\vaae or
hazardous constituents from solid waste
.management units (SWMUs) at permitted - ;
hazardous waste treatment, storage, 'and,
disposal facilities (TSDFs). Is RCRA
corrective-action limited'to releases'from
SWMUs?.: '"' • /"• ' ' '"•••;
' Any relea» of solid or hazardous waste
which poses a threat to health or lie %
environment is potentially subject to RCRA
* remedial authority. To this end, RCRA
, provides EPA with several distinct authorities
to require corrective action for contamination
stemming from sources other than SWMUs.
A SWMU is a discernible unit in which solid
wastes have been placed at any time,
irrespective of whether the unit was intended
for me management of solid or hazardous •
wastes. This definition includes any area at a .
facilityat which solid wastes have been
routinely and systematically released. RCRA
§3004(11), which is specifically limited to
rejeases from SWMUs,;isme primary .
authority.icqnirmgcc«rective.actioaat
permitted TSDFsV Section 3004(u) requires a
fecility owner or operator^tp address releases
. from SWMUs .whenever seeking a RCRA
permiL " "-••-* ; "- - • • •
• •' Many potential .releases at permitted- ,
TSDFs do not ongihatefiom SWMUs, •
however, and tie not subject to 53004 cleanup
requirements. For example, a one-time spill
of hazardous wastfrfinonvt vehicle traveling
.across a facility is mX* release from t ,
SWMU. For^soch releases not originating
from SWMUs at rjermitted TSDFs, and for
releases at TSDFs with permits mat pre-date
HSWA and wtnch therefore do not contain'
§3004
-------
Finally, RCRA §7003 gives EPA broad
. authority to abate hazards caused by releases
of solid or hazardous waste fiomany'sbuiw,
including SWMUs/ Specifically,'§7003
provides_ EPA.Avith the authority to seek
i^uriiw"relSeIm111tfie appropriate United -
States WstrictCo^nt,-*,atte'ndtice.to the
Affected state, isspe administrative corrective
•action orders for releases -from any 'site where
.the handling, storage, treatment, transportation.
or disposal of solid or hazardous waste may
, pose an'immineht and- substantial endanger-
menttohealth'crtiie'environrnent. UseoiF
•§7003 is not lirrrite^ to any particular typeof
* fecility or waste unit"'
I : * j . -/ . - .
•ii|i i «iiiii iMii iiiiiii ii n 111 11 iiiw iiiiiiin 11 i i i mi nil in ( i (i i i i INI i 1111
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
OCTI8I995 9502.1995(03)
OFFICE OF
SOUO WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
ML. Mullins, Vice President
Regulatory Affairs - .
Chemical Manufacturing Association (CMA)
2501MSt,NW
Washington, DC 20037 .
Dear Mr. Mullins:
This letter is in response to your letter of August 22, 1995 in which you expressed^
CMA's concern regarding the Agency's plans to "disallow continued use of the corrective^
action management unit (CAMU) provision" that was promulgated on February 16, 1993?
(55 FR 8658).
• • *•
As I believe you know, the CAMU rule was the Agency's initial attempt at .
resolving many of the problems that have been encountered by EPA State remediation
programs in applying the prevention-oriented Subtitle C regulations to the management
of remedial wastes. The Agency continues to support the need for flexibility in this area^
however, some parties have argued that the CAMU rule allows regulators too much
discretion in determining appropriate, site-specific management requirements for
remediation wastes. In recognition of this view, the Agency agreed to evaluate whether
the CAMU regulations should be modified or replaced with a different regulatory
approach. As an outcome of this process, the Agency agreed the CAMU regulation
should be replaced with the Hazardous Waste Identification Rule for Contaminated
Media (HWIR-Media). The Agency is currently planning to propose the HWIR-media
rule in December of this year and issue final regulations in March 1997.
The Agency believes that much of the site-specific flexibility provided in the '
CAMU will be preserved based on the current version of the draft HWIR-media
regulation, especially for less-contaminated media. Furthermore, the Agency intends to
include a provision in the proposed HWIR-media rule that would in effect "grandfather"
CAMUs that were approved before the HWIR-media rule is issued final. However, no
new CAMUs could be approved after the that date. The Agency believes that this
"grandfathering" provision, if finalized, would will result in minimal disruptions to
cleanups involving CAMUs that are planned ^or underway. It should be noted, however,
that the Agency plans to ask for coment in tlfe proposal as to whether " grandfathe ing"
of CAMUs is appropriate, and, in particular, whether the Agency should set a date upon
which approval of "grandfathered" CAMUs would expire.
RecyctedfltocycUfeto
P«1n»»dwWtSoy/CB»a««lnkonp«p«rth«t
-------
-2-
In the interim, our recommendation to both the regulators and the regulated
community is to use a CAMU if it truly provides the best alternative for a site (and the
AOC concept, which is a concept independent of the CAMU rule, cannot be used). Of
course, tie most conservative course of actjpn would 5^ ^ ^ £ Q^JU ^y'jf ft can be
completed! prior to publication of the final HWIR-media rule.
I hope that this letter helps to clarify the basis for our current plans. If you have
any (fustians regarding the HWIR-media rule and its impact on the CAMU rule, please
call Carolyn Hoskincon at 703/308-8626. Questions regarding the AOC concept should
be directed either to Hugh Davis at 703/308-8633 or Elizabeth McManus at 703/308-
8657. .„ • .- . .
Shapiro, Director
if Solid Waste
lilllll,i| I'i i, "Ii Ot ., "•;'«,, llililll!!' •' H !"i "I ',111: Bill liiniB .. MB n< '• linn."' "I'll.1* il'li'1:!!! "'. ''ill"!':!!! 'i" ' I: 1 !: ii '. !:>>i"i!ll "iliill'i I''! I. 'I . I'!!! • .'<' Iiiii! '* .:. '<'' "!::"'' • ' ' , ": :'•- " , ni! I- ml"'
•llllllll, "("liiiS i ii!'. , . If!" i'":" III11.1Ii,",! " • riit:!!** ! i,,:."!;'!!! iiTliiii I" It'.!":' •',;' 11 jl IHi Blliiaii11,!I'll ' r, nil!
iniliil I (III I1!, ii " iFIILI li'Nlilll'illllllJ!Illl:lillll\,lll^nillll|l| I'll'll'lli i'" ' I jl',1'1 I, Jl ' L:'L I '',i IIIIIJIL Ill il'lvil "HI "I" HL Illlll' I"' 'UHl!,:1''!!!1!!,""!!'mllll'l
fittbi*; viBi1*" • -in si iiiiiiit »:, •; /(iii
Ill1 nil NIL!Illj I '„ IIIIIIIIIIIBI'lll' ,1:1!" r , i1,, I IIVIIIDIl'.'lhll
' '', ''i'lii'i'ii' ilili'iFi'ii:iF:iiiiiilji'iiii:1',
IliB ' IIF ill
in1 iii::'iiii"'! , f i"'; !i>,'i - i1;'n, •;:'" ^:«' m \ >' i i;":'i! !.;i;; > fi1, i W\ \\s Ivi i:' • iJiPiii nL K':;» ''"'•; flftf * ^:aim^^ <" i iiiii^iiiiK!! ipt'iiiniii1' ii' i ih i K\ <»v!'^ "liiiri iiiii il i, .ilL!l.'.; ,i, v < ?:M >L> ' 'iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii!' i' iiiiiili'tniiiti'ii^hiifiiii ia
\' < ;!;!, <;"• IB'"!!' :; g''';: ii I'DiiiiillviUi1"'!!!!' '<; !;„,'!' "j .Ji>.. l»f: I:, Hll,;1!!;!! HIJi f! I v||!l!'!' Bii"1". aS'Siniiiii, L..I III! !!9'!l 'FT ''iSIHiilliliililBJi!!!.;!1'1! IH1:: Hi:1',! Bil^lli't' '» <• ^, >'' •; TI, ' 'I'liiii" ' " il 11 << iiiilimt!1'' I AiUpii. i iiliinlil i !i ,<;
1 , i!'I! I1!1!!,:!! i " 11"!1',!!;' 'JWiil" !!!i\|:i,ll'!lllli,iiLO'l,,jl! S "inv' ii '"IliiilJil"1 i'i'f Si,1 ill'llSlll!'!1"::1'1::::11 lIllllIiiitli.TilJ'if :n^!!!i;iiijilllll|l
-------
CHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION
t/LLMuMm
V*» PiMMert-ftegdatofy Mtin
August 22,1995
Mr. Michael H. Shapiro, Director
Office of Solid Waste (5301)
US. Environmental Protection Agency
401M Street S.W.
Washington, D.C 20460 ;
Re: Collective Action Management Units
Dear Mr.
The Chemical Manufacturers Association (CMA) is concent by reports mat
ntext of the u|x»ml^
disallow confiroied iu« of me correct^
tiutwas promulgated on Rbruary 16, 1993 (58 FR 8658). -? ; , ;
•:. . .-.- t*'PA Hffff If^T^gy****
inherently different from; me management of as-generated industrial waste* (58 FR
8660) and that "the existing regulatory structure of RCRA Subtitle C, when applied, to
management of hazardous waste for remedial purposes, can often serlousry hamper me
pfrffity nf d^cis^OT! ir^yVfrs to tflpct and tmpTqfr>fnt ff*fyfivpf nr
effective remedies" (58 PR 8659). The Agency promulgated tiveCAMlfprovision to :
piffn TpyVTy '^^fh iff -^4
-------
.. • - • - - . ;-. - '...«. i-,
:' Tpdisjltowmis sensible and valuable prtndsionwbuldDetotaihyiricom
» mantr nri-»/vJr»«- UUA —!—*-* • •-<• • • *-* -- . , */•. •»«. » . • . - ,- •• •> _ ._ .- .
» iM o'Tc
flexible cost effective manner. To disaltoWtheCAMU provision would be^^a tdantsteo
..•'.•••.•' - •-•'.. ^ • • .. T . - . • . - • t» , . tr
C3vlA recognizes that some parties have challenged the legal andpolicy basis of
MO and- temnnr-jinr imi» nTTl ^«4Tag •' /**MA i^^wu. iX.^. * .' L-i-5l: _• . _< ...'•..
ales. CMA urges ihc Agency to vigorously .v ; -x >, ^
^S^IS*1*^^
Q£riflH^M&a-3tfE&!^^
of my staff, at (202) 887-6936
! L, .:. >.;-. /;.'•-; A"/ *• -^• *;-v? •<:;•/? i:'-/1'. •.- r^>/-';; i- -^ :>;f^:-.^^5':^.-v\-.;V -'^.v;^.^.*^^
^^S — E—^- - - -Jr '-Si -r ' : -. ' ; : , ' :'• I '' - ^4^ - hr = = ^r: :,: » i : • ^X:rt rrt?, i '-. '• * --A \ ^ 2ll l^j .'\^'
-------
Volume 13
Addendum
Place the attached
documents at the end
of the appropriate
Category Number in
Volume 13
-------
illJlllli'N Ill "ill1 >nr lllll'htli! iJ'iiiiilif Illllll L
11
lull1 "i II 'I'll Ill 11! Id1 Nil'I iiillj Hi "III1'mi1 Mi|,i 1, 'i llli, I,
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
111 I Illllll
Illllll 111 111 Illllll 11 Illllll Illllll 111 1 PI 1 I 1
1 111 II I 111 I 111 III II 111 II
III 111 III III I Illllll III II III 111 1111IIII I Illllll II
i/iiiiiii ijiiiii st.iiii iliS i'i BH^^a^is''^^^^* iw^^^ iS^wiiiM'•:*!! wV) I
t'-Vi&i !• MKAWMi lilllil'lilil inHlt%fM^^^^^^^^^ AfSHHJf, fulfil X:;1B
);H::!iEI(IR!.ililE ItiJRI'l JlililW;!::*11'!11!-!!:' • (Bin ,.'•• II li'i: ":!'X1!t:"'"ll>
IllllllThiillUlli I: Jil' It ''"I'lllTlf ill" JJ'' IN11:11!!:!,!!!'" ii" ' IHA I" I.lull''I' 'i.!' ••ITII'illlHil/lllili:!!!1' .Ill'1 U 1IH1"'l|lllllll!iilllllll''illlill '"j'iMH' ii ^WIIIIIIIIinMII'liliilI'lW^^^^ lllri'll v ''Ullhllini 'll|i",',' !'4i' I" "AllilL :|i/lll
I!1)! •••I I :liif!1llE|i{il9III IlilttlW^^ hiaiillB^^^^^^^
-------
'UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
9551.1995(01)
. ' OFFICEOF
0 *P°? . SOLD WASTE AND EMERGENCY
. . ' ' . . "RESPONSE
Mr. Basil G. Constantelos
Vice President • ..•'-"
Environmental Affairs ...'.' • • ... • . . . .. ••
Safety-Kleen ' . ,
1000 North Randall Road
Elgin, Illinois 60123-7857 ' .
o^.v^ • " • •••-. .
Dear ME^Constantelos: ^. •
Thank you for your letter dated November 17, 1994 regarding -
the land disposal restrictions (LDR) Phase II regulation that *'
appeared in the Federal Register on September 19,. 1994. You .;
provided some interesting ideas for the Phase II technical
correction notice and proposed an implementation approach for ;•>
your company to comply with the.new Phase II notification. *
requirements. These issues are discussed below. -
.1. Removal of treatment standards from the LDR notifications
Safety-Kleen favors the action taken in the Phase II final £
rule that deleted treatment standards or references, to treatment
standards from being required on LDR notifications. It was
pointed out that parts of the regulatory language in 40 CFR 268.7
still reflected the old requirements. We appreciate you pointing
this out. Furthermore, we have corrected the error in.the Phase.
II correction notice (see 60 FR 242, column three, January 3,
1995) . . . .
The Agency agrees that the elimination of the treatment
standards from the LDR notification does not lessen the
substantive LDR requirements, but rather makes an administrative
adjustment to lessen the paperwork burden on the regulated - •
community. Furthermore, you suggest that EPA clarify for the
states and the regulated community that the Changes to the LDR
notification requirements should be immediately applicable. When
the Phase II requirements became effective 12/19/94, all
notification requirements (including corrections made in the
technical amendment) were in place and were immediately
effective. . . .
R»cycl»d/B»cyclabl« . Primed wiffi Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Recyded Paper (40% Postconsumer)
-------
2. Clarification of application of analytical test methods
Safety-Kleen states that for some waste matrices, toe SW-846 test methods will not
achieve detection levels near the universal treatment standard (UTS) levels. It is suggested
that EPA issue gujdance ..... on ..... what ....... PQL ....... is ....... needed ...... to ...... demonstrate ........ that ....... the ....... UTS ....... are ....... met. ....... It is
al?o ...... suggested ....... tibitEPA ...... clarify ....... that ...... the ....... application ...... ofEPA ....... SW-846 ...... meSods""may ....... not be
appropriate ........ for ..... analysis ...... of "all ....... UTS ....... in all ......... Waste ....... matricesT [[[ ] ............................ '
Cojnpliance with LDR regulations is usually measured by achieving a constituent
...... " ....... ' ..... ...... ....... ....... .................. '" ..........
.concentration ...... level" at ....... or'beTow ..... the ...... UTS ....... for ....... that constiluenl. .................. ifo^e'ver", .......... when coinbustion .................
technologies are used to comply with UTS for organic constituents, EPA considers nondetect
values within an order of magnitude of the UTS to be in compliance (see § 268.40 (d)).
It is unclear from the information in your letter what type of materials create your
company's detection level difficulties. Without further clarification, we are unable to issue
further guidance. It should be noted that except hi cases where test methods are specified in
Part 268, there is no requirement that SW-846 methods be used to demonstrate compliance
with the UTS.
3. Approach to implementing Phase II LDR requirements
i _
Safety-Kleen has developed an implementation strategy to comply with new
paperwork requirements while also assuring that UTS are met. Under 40 CFR 268. 7(a) (1)
".: "(ii) in the Phase II rule, the generator must include on the LDR notification all the waste
constituents that the treater will monitor, if monitoring will not include all regulated
constituents, for wastes F001-F005, F039, D001, D002, and D012-D043. The majority of
Safety-Kleen's managed waste will be monitored after solvent reclamation, and monitoring
wjll include all underlying hazardous constituents. For wastes ultimately managed outside
the Safety-Kleen system by other facilities, Safety Kleen is obtaining written confirmation
that these other facilities will be monitoring for all underlying hazardous constituents.
Therefore, no specific constituents will be listed on the LDR notification coming from
Safety-Kleen's customers (generators).
If monitoring for all "underlying hazardous constituents" means all UTS constituents,
such an approach complies with the new Phase II requirements^. The generators of the
hazardous ........ wisjte ..... wl! ......... ^eclfy^tt^elrncJ^k^OT^^^Sey ..... have ......... a ........ D001 ......... (or ....... o"mer) .......... waste ......... and .......
....... ...... w i| ...... not ........ include^gn ..... the ........ no^ificatign ........ any_ ........ underlying ....... hazardous ........ constituents. .................. Therefore, ....... the .........................
J!:' "Wpaterj ..... ''in' this case "Safety-Kleenl'11 must ........ treat ....... and" ........ ^o^tor ....... for ....... all ....... the ...... cons tim"ents" ....... o"n" ....... the" UTS .........
list (all underlying hazardous constituents).
This page has been retyped fi-om the original
-------
I hope you find these responses helpful. Should you have
additional questions or comments, feel free to direct them to
Rhonda Craig of my staff, at (703) 308-8771. .
incerely,
1 Shapiro
or
ce of Solid Waste
-------
5
. November 17, 1994 • "'
, Michael H. Shapiro, Director •
'Office of £?olid Waste (MSr5301)
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401 H Street, S.W.
'Washington, D.C. 2046Q
RE: Phase II LDR Regulation
Dear Mr. Shapiro: * -.
' ' This letter provides foliow-up to a November 3, 1994 meeting
between MichaelLeBelofSafetyrKleen Corp. and Richard KinchT
Rhonda Craig, and Doug Heimlich of the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA). During this meeting Mr. LeBel raised several issues
and implementation questions regarding the September 19, 1994 Phase
II Land Disposal Restriction (LDR) regulations. EPA informed
Safety-Kleen of the Agency's intention to issue a technical
,c°EESSfe±2D tea Sie final regulation prior to the December 19 1994 '
§J|te_ia In light of EPA's intention to issue a technical
correction and Safety-Kleen's questions regarding approaches to
comply with the new regulations, EPA suggested that Safety-Kleen
PreParea letteroutlining suggestions for technical corrections
. and our proposed approach for complying with the Phase II LDR
Regulations. In addition fco, isoking forward to receiving EPA's
response, we also suggest that our implementation approach be
addressed in the correction notice.
ISSUES FOR TECHNICAL CORRECTION NOTICE
1. Removal of Treatment Standards From LDR Notices
i
As the largest user of manifests and LDR notices in the U.S.
Safety-Kleen welcomes the opportunity to share our experience
Regarding the use of LDR notices. Safety-Kleen agrees with
Preamble language, which states that "...EPA is thus dropping the
^treatment standard or reference to the treatment standard from the
F-DR notification in this final rule" (59 PR 4.8004). However, the
regulatory language in 40 CFR 268. 7 (a) (1) (as revised) did not
incorporate new regulatory language to address this change.
suggests the following regulatory language in 40 CFR
268, 7 (a) (i) to address this discrepancy:
If a generator determines that he is managing a
restricted waste under this part and the waste does not
meet the applicable treatment standards set forth in
1000 NOflTH RANDALL ROAD ELGIN. ILLINOIS 60123-7857 .' PHONE 708/697^460 FAX 708/468-8500
'. 'PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
-------
Mr. Michael Shapiro 2
November 15, 1994
Subpart D of this part or exceeds the applicable
prohibition levels set forth in 268.32 or RCRA Section
3004(d), with each shipment of waste the generator must
notify the treatment.or storage facility in writing of
the restriction from land disposal of this waste. The
notice must include the following information....
t . • • '
Safety-Kleen suggests that EPA clarify in the preamble that .the
elimination of the treatment standards on the LDR notice is not a
less stringent approach to the current regulations,.but rather is
an administrative adjustment. The same treatment standards are in
effect under the new regulation as under .the old regulation. The
change to the LDR .notice will make it more functional and easier to
use, without reduced protection of human health and the
environment. ...••_ .
Safety-Kleen also suggests that EPA clarify for states and the
regulated community and that the immediate application of the
change in the LDR notice is appropriate. As with previously
promulgated LDR regulations, the original LDR regulatory framework
has been adjusted and improved with each subsequent regulation.
Generators have the obligation to comply with existing regulations
that States may be authorized to implement, but must also comply
with newly promulgated Federal requirements. A clarification on
the immediate use of the new LDR notice format would assist the
regulated community in understanding and complying with the LDR
requirements and would not reduce effectiveness of the regulations.
2. Clarification of Application of Analytical Test Methods
Safety-Kleen has found that for some waste, matrices, the SW-846
test methods will not achieve detection levels near the UTS levels.
This raises two issues. First, EPA should provide implementation
guidance on what PQL is needed to demonstrate that the UTS
standards are met. Second, EPA needs to clarify that the
application of EPA SW-846 Test Methods may not be appropriate for
analysis of all Universal Treatment Standards (UTS) constituents in
all waste matrices. EPA needs to encourage the development of
improved test methods and use of alternate protocols by waste
generators and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal (TSD) facilities in
order to better characterize UTS constituent levels for a broad
range.of waste forms. Safety-Kleen suggests that EPA clarify that
alternate test methods can be used without prior EPA approval with
proper documentation and that their use is appropriate for a
particular application and will achieve a lower detection . limit.
The preamble is currently silent with respect to this issue and
Safety-Kleen finds that this is problematic. Constituent analysis
is a fundamental component of the implementation of the LDR rules.
The regulated community needs EPA's assistance in making this
-------
•iiiiiii 111
Mr. Michael Shapiro
November 15, 1994
system functional. Safety-Kleen has discussed these issues with
.............................................. Barry Lesnik and Gail Hansen of the Office of Solid Waste and we
.encourage ........... -you ............... to .......... solicit their opinion on the matter. •
•3. Approach to Implementing Phase II LDR Requirements
As described in the November 3, 1994 meeting, Safety-Kleen has
developed ............. an ........... ImpTementatiibn ............. strategy for compliance with the Phase
II LDR regulations. This strategy is outlined below and we are
looking forward to any comments EPA may have regarding our
• ; "approach.; _ •'.•.-' •' .- <•[.'. . •. '••
'Safety-Kleen is the world's largest recycler of solvents and other
...... , ............ „ ........ ........ ..... ;; ......... ............... ............. Coj|taminaJ:§d fluids, providing environmentally- beneficial waste
management services to nearJ.y;4J)0,Oj)0 customers in the U.S. While
Sa^ty^jg^jj offers a ............ range ........... of .......... wa^t£ ............ recycling ............. and! ......... energy ............ recovery .....
services£ we specialize in servicing smaller businesses and smaller
waste generators. Approximately, .95 percent of our customers are
small guantity generators (100 to 1,000 kg/mo) or conditionally
1 exempt ............. small guantity generators (,1688 than 100' kg/mo) . Because of
...................................... fhe ............ subslaisliiaJ: ................. paperwork ................ burden ................. on ...................... the- ................ mail businesses that
constitutes the vast majority of our customer base, Safety-Kleen
, often provides implementation guidance on manifesting, LDR notices,
and waste analysis information as a part of our service.
majority of the waste streams accepted by Safety-Kleen are
handled through our 182 accumulation/collection facilities
(branches). The majority of the waste streams remain in the
containers while being temporarily stored at one of our branches.
Only one waste . stream, a petroleum naphtha (mineral spirits) based
solventi^is ............... bulked ............... at .............. most .............. of ............... our ................ branch ............... locations. .................................... Some ........... wastes
from ............ larger ........... g^^^^^ ............ bypass ............. our ............ branch ........... gys^^i ............ and ........... are ........... transported
directly to one of our recycle facilities for recovery operations.
The majority of the waste materials entering the Safety-Kleen
system are recycled into usable products (e.g., parts washer
solvent, paint thinner s, motor oils, etc) . Where appropriate,
i'es'idues from recycling, along with other non-recoverable materials
with ...................... BTU ...................... Yaiiig, are recycled for energy recovery in our fuel
blending operations. The useful products produced from the
recycling processes and the cement made in the kilns supplied with
,,,<3ur hjusardojias .................... Waite ................. fuels .................. are .................. products ................. and ................... are .................... not ..... subject to
regulation under the RCRA framework, and thus are not subject to
pie LDR requirements. Cement kiln dust (CKD) is subject to
regulation under 40 CFR 266.112 and will be tested in accordance
with these requirements.
Some treatment residues and appropriate customer wastes are sent to
hazardous waste incineration; off-site chemical/physical treatment
.facilities, or third-party treatment, storage, and disposal
-------
Mr. Michael Shapiro 4
November 15, 1994
facilities. Safety-Kleen is in the process of obtaining written
acknowledgements from all outside facilities receiving these wastes
that all underlying UTS constituents will be analyzed for at their
facilities, unless otherwise specified on an LDR notice with a
given shipment of waste. .
The Phase II LDR rule requires that the LDR notice include "the
waste constituents that the treater will monitor for, if monitoring
will not include all regulated constituents, for wastes F001-F005,
F039, D001, D002, and D012-D043" (40 CFR 268.7(a)(1)(ii)).
Safety-Kleen plans to comply with this regulation by monitoring for
all underlying UTS constituents. For the majority of Safety-Kleen
managed waste, this monitoring will be conducted on wastes and
residuals after reclamation. For wastes ultimately managed outside
the Safety-Kleen system by other facilities, Safety-Kleen will have
written confirmation that these other facilities will be monitoring
for underlying UTS constituents.
The underlying UTS constituents will be monitored during the waste
management process. No specific constituents will be listed on the
LDR notice coming from our customers, the original generator.
These constituents will be identified, by Safety-Kleen or the
receiving facility, prior to ultimate waste or residue disposal.
For recycling for re-use waste streams, the recycling process
results in regenerated clean product and treatment residues levels
that are more concentrated than, the original waste. For the wastes
leaving the Safety-Kleen system, we are requiring that the
receiving facilities monitor for the presence of underlying
constituents, and treat as necessary, to ensure that all UTS are
met prior to land disposal. We believe that there will be no loss
of enforcement capabilities under this approach that a
clarification should be presented in the technical correction.
Safety-Kleen appreciates the opportunity to provide comments for
the Phase II LDR correction notice. We will also be anxious to
receive EPA's feedback regarding our implementation strategy.
Please contact me at (708) 468-2217 or Catherine McCord at (708)
468-2245 if you have any questions.
Sincerely yours,
Basil 6. Constantelos
Vice President
Environmental Affairs
-------
1,1
Mr. Michael Shapiro
November 15, 1994
cc: Richard J. Kinch
; Chief, Waste Treatment Branch
Office of Solid Waste (MS-5302W)
i p.SS-a Environmental Profeejetion Agency
2805 Crystal Drive
Arlington, Virginia . 22202
III ill I Ill 111 IIII lllll|lll|ll III I II I ill I III I1 ll'"lll'l|
ill I 1 I I I I '
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY /
. , ' -WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
'.. ' ' '.: '• : 9554.1995 (01)
1,4 1995V -
.v . . .OFFICE OF
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE
Roy .F. Weston, Inc.. ; .
Ms. Janell B. Bergman, P.O.,. CPG
Senior Project Manager ',:.. •
215 Union Boulevard, Suite 550
Lakewood, CO 80228-1842
Dear Ms. Bergman:
1995,
It is a pleasure to respond to your letter dated April 27,
*.**^, regarding the Land Disposal.Restrictions Phase. II final
rule (59 FR 47982) . Specifically, you requested an ..
interpretation of the phrase' "which can reasonably be expected to
be present." as it applies to underlying hazardous .constituents-in
soil that 'exhibits the toxicity characteristic.: . . • ;
The preamble.to the final "Phase II "rule states: "regulated
entities do.ndt have to ascertain, the presence.of all hazardous
constituents for which EPA is promulgating a universal treatment
standard. Generators may base this-determination on their
knowledge of the raw materials they use> .the process they
operate, and .the potential reaction products of the process, or .
upon the results of a one-time analysis.of.the entire list of
constituents at § 268.48." (See 59 PR 48.015.)- .. , ... :
.In the case of contaminated soil, however, the "generator"
may not be the party that caused: the contamination, but. rather
•may be the one performing the cleanup. As.you point out., it may
be difficult to determine exactly what constituents are .
reasonably expected to be present in the soil because of the lack
of records about the site and the absence of anyone who has
institutional memory about the cause of the contamination. It is
appropriate, therefore, to use the constituents.that are at .
levels above the Universal Treatment Standards, based on _
monitoring at the site, provided analysis has been conducted for
the entire list of constituents at § 268.48. These would be the
constituents reasonably expected to be present at the point of
generation (in a remediation, the point of generation is the
point the contaminated poil is picked up)~. • '. . -. . ,
*^ .• .' i •.,.*• :. _ . . •
Printed on Recycled Paper
-------
iia^^^^^^^^^^ 'ilia :?i^^^
hope you find this information helpful. if you have
|h££ questions, please call Rhonda Craig of my staff on
308~B/7jL. • .
....... !1!B^^^^^^^^^^^ ..... .
Sincerely,
Micha
Dire
Off!
hapiro
'f Solid Waste
••i in in i nil i nil i i" i
11 , Hill '
i 1
I '
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiii iiiiiii i in iiiiiiiiin nil iiiiiiii MI iiii 11 muni '• •
\
-------
MANAGERS
DESIGNERS/CONSULTANTS
215 UNION BOULEVARD. SUITE 550
LAKEWOOD. CO 80228-1842
303-980-6800 FAX: 303-980-1622
; 27 April 1995
Mr. Michael Shapiro
Director, Office of Solid Waste
United States Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street, SW
Washington, D.C. 20460
SUBJECT: Land Disposal Restrictions - Phase H
*
Dear Mr. Shapiro:
Roy F. Western, Inc. requests an interpretation of a phrase pertaining to the recently published
I*nd Disposal Restrictions - Phase H (59 £S 47982). Specifically, we request an interpretatidn
of the phrase "which can reasonably be expected to be present" as it applies to underlying
hazardous constituents that may be found in soil that exhibits the toxicity characteristic (TCLpf
(Sections 268.2(i) and 268.40(e)) , -
" . . • ** .
Application of this concept is straightforward as it applies to industrial waste streams; however
it becomes difficult when referring to contaminated soil where unknown wastes were deposited
years ago. Weston requests EPA's interpretation of this concept as it applies to contaminated soils
Is it sufficient to use the list of constituents that have been detected at the site as the list of
constituents reasonably expected to be present? ~ .
Thank you for your attention to this matter. We look forward to your response to this question.
cc:
Mr. Jim Thompson
Office of Regulatory Enforcement
RCRA Enforcement Division
Sincerely,
ROY F. WESTON, INC.
Tanell B. Bergman, P.O., CPG
Senior Project Manager
-------
UN, ::'!,!! ..... 'fill' 'TI3
..... j ..... ,,,!llilili,liln ........ iNLili! Iliii i , l
IIIB IBS ,i su \' ' asa,t<»!
fttt " * "„ >':!l': il'IR firfll 4,i' H'i1;'! I
Mi'!!!?" a Jill ! ' I" !: ! •' i! ' 'III1 • ,,i '. . ''rtlllli I" riliil' ' '!' ' ', ' 'I1! link1' *' Jill i«i L; "fK t TV '
i1 4 \ ' IS!'1 H: . ' <:,
jl.; ¥»'»• lill'J'IIIIiiIjTIililll, ,1: . IllfUIIIIJIjliflji
pli I/WI I:!1:!1!!! ........ ill, <«, ' , I:1:1: ft,1 aim ! l"i V ;i>>',;lii ..... -I" JmBf i . : w\ q H Jini
lji ill '' i ' : i ,„' IIPlM ilKlnJi! lk , ' . I* ijllli I!'1!1" illi ' 'i , • 'I. if: " , ' ihUlliilil, ' ..... j.i« 14,11 llli'lilli":]]!!':" l!l: ' illj
,
i iHUiiiiii1; ,1 i : ' ....... limilll
. 'HIIHIB jil ,' " '' , < 'liillE!l::«'iii JB:!; .B":*!"
aj;." |iiia ; : ..... <:•;, liiiiii
B3:; • ;,r ,•<. Bjlpiil BJalBiaili^iiiiJBj'fiiiiliij"1 aippai
H !^ I
"" " "" ..... "' ™ "'' * ..... """" " ....... '"~ " " : " " "' ..... "™" ™ ™ * °*" " *" ' " """ ....... ' ...... ....... '""'JI"1 "~"l '"" ...... '' ....... ..... ' "ii"""1 '""' '"' '"' '"" "" ™"""1" "' ' '"" ™ " "" ''1""' ' ™' ' " ' " * ' " ' ...... ™' ' ""' """"' ...... ' ' ' ......................
l ' — " 1 —— lll — ' i ll ' l "" l ' '' ' - ;; ' ' ' '• ' ' — ' • — ' ' •' " .
"i JIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIKI Jin 'ililMJllilniHlnlll IIP!!!' "i .,!!!" ' lIllllllllllU'!,!!! ..... i!|i i ,"' ,,l::" ,M "HiilKliI 'I HP ;' lllliillif 1PH i Ii , nlUE "« JT1 ' " ,! I, I. Jllllllli V ,K I'l ...... Ih1 ll 1 1MB! '' « |i'[ ,, ' Illin" ii . Ill ' nl" ' I, .lllni " si! ' • ' ,:"' . ' ' "UHli1 IP1 .1 ..... K Illli "I1 iPVP'JiiiB'I'in: ..... !i" ' '!„ VI, IIP" PPL P«l IPIPP PPPP ...... P '"!:,: ; lii'i P ' IPIiPPlPPPPl .HPPPI ' PPP'l , ' '!! "PJ PPPPPPP ..... PPPPPli! 'PPPniK1'!1 <;liPi ...... f
IliisP&ge ....... Intentionally "
i
i
n 11 iiiiiiiii mill in nil ill i 11 i in i MI
i i ill iiiiiiiii iiiiiiiii i in ii
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
9554.1995(02;
Signature date: September 19, 1995
Mr. Kevin J. Igli
Vice President, Environment, Health & Safety
Chemical Waste Management, Inc.
3001 Butterfield Road
Oak Brook, Illinois 60521
Dear Mr. Igli:
Thank you for your letter of June 15, 1995, regarding macroencapsulation of
hazardous debris. You referred to an interpretive guidance memorandum sent by EPA's
Office of Solid Waste to EPA Region VIII on February 16, 1994 regarding the
macioencapsulation of mixed hazardous/radioactive debris waste, and requested clarification
on the memorandum's applicability. Specifically, you requested EPA's determination on
whether CWM's macroencapsulation process addresses the requirements of 40 CFR 268.45,
Table 1.
As your letter pointed out, EPA has specified two definitions of macroencapsulation:
a specified technology for D008 radioactive lead solids, and one for hazardous debris. In 40
CFR 268.42, Table 3, EPA specified for D008 radioactive lead solids a required method of
treatment, macroencapsulation. Macroencapsulation is defined in § 268.42, Table 1 as:
Macroencapsulation with surface coating materials such as polymeric organics (e.g.,
resins and plastics) or with a jacket of inert inorganic materials to substantially reduce
surface exposure to potential leaching media. Macroencapsulation specifically does
not include any material that would be classified as a tank or container according to
40 CFR 260.10.
EPA defined macroencapsulation for hazardous debris at § 268.45 as:
Application of surface coating materials such as polymeric organics (e.g., resins and
plastics) or use of a jacket of inert inorganic materials to substantially reduce surface
exposure to potential leaching media.
Obviously, the only difference between the definitions is that the prohibition against using
This page has been retyped from the original
-------
II; ," ..'I
tanks and containers was not included infthe definition of macroencapsulation for treating
hazardous debris. Thus, the Agency provided more flexibility in treatment for hazardous
debris by not specifically prohibiting the use of tanks and containers.
Your letter describes CWM's macroencapsulation process. A jacket of inert inorganic
Material is placed around the hazardous debris as the encapsulating agent in a high density
"polyethylene vault. The lid of the vault is secured and the unit is disposed in a subtitle C
(hazardous waste) landfill.
It is EPA's determination that your treatment process meets the definition of
macroencapsulation for hazardous debris, subject to an evaluation that the tank or container
£it:|§ §&ifiBiSPy s°und and Distant to degradation, in order to substantially reduce exposure to
potential leaching media. As you allude to in your letter, merely placing hazardous debris in
3tankor container, except under special circumstances where the container is made of
rioncorroding materials (e.g., stainless steel), would not fulfill the macroencapsulation
treatment standard- State or EPA Regional authorities can best evaluate if the design criteria
and operation procedures are sufficient.
EPA does not view this as a reversal of its previous position hi its memorandum of
February 18, 1994. Rather, it is clarifying that for the treatment of hazardous debris, the
definition of macroencapsulation in § 268.45 should be used, and for the treatment of D008
radioactive lead solids, the definition in § 268.42 should be used.
Hopefully, this response addresses your concerns. If you have further questions, do
liot hesitate to give me a call on (703) 308-8434.
Sincerely,
Richard Kinch
Chief
Waste Treatment Branch
in mim i (111 ii i nil ill i
cc Fredrick Moore, Oregon DEQ
ilnu nun ii mi ii —j = 'i""" •""
Bruce Long, Region X, Oregon Operations Office
This page has been retyped from the original
-------
HOTLINE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
9561.1995(01)
RCRA
2. RCRA Waste Minimization
Requirements
RCRA subjects generators of hazardous
waste and treatment, storage, and disposal
facilities (TSDFs) that manage their own
hazardous waste on site to waste minimization
requirements. What are the specific
requirements?
Generators who generate 1,000 or more
kilograms per month of hazardous waste
("large quantity" generators) and owners and
operators of hazardous waste TSDFs who
manage their own hazardous waste on site
must comply with similar waste minimization
requirements. RCRA §3002(b) requires large
quantity generators who transport waste off
site to certify on the manifest that they have
established a "program in place" to reduce the
volume or quantity and toxicity of hazardous
waste generated to the extent economically •
practicable. For owner/operators, that manage
waste on site in a permitted TSDF, §3005(h)
requires that a certification that a waste
minimization program is in place be prepared
annually and maintained in the facility
operating record. In the May 28,1993,
Federal Register (58 ER. 31114), EPA
published interim final guidance on the
elements of a waste minimization "program in
place" to assist generators and TSDFs in
fulfilling these requirements. The guidance
provides latitude for a facility to tailor
program elements to meet the individual
facility's needs. EPA has published a
Pollution Prevention Guide. EPA600-R-92-
088, to assist generators in tailoring the
guidance to die individual facility's needs.
RCRA §3002(aX6) also requires large
quantity generators to submit biennial reports
describing their waste minimization efforts.
Specifically, large quantity generators must
describe the efforts undertaken to achieve
waste minimization and the actual changes in
the volume and toxicity achieved relative to
other years (§262.41(a){6>(7)). The biennial
report requirements for TSDFs mat generate
waste parallel those specific to large quantity
generators (§§264/265.75(h) and (i)).
Small quantity generators who generate
greater than 100 kilograms but less than 1,000
kilograms of hazardous waste per month are
not subject to the same "program in place"
certification requirement as large quantity
generators. Instead, they must certify on their
hazardous waste manifests that they have
"made a good faith effort to minimize" their
waste generation (51 ER 35190; October 1,
1986).
-------
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
lll ..... 1H^^^^^ IIIIIH llllliill Id ill 11 ....... lilill ...... llilliillilillil ........ lllllll ..... Ill ill ililll ...... 1 11 ......... Hi lull Illllllllliiillilll ..... In 11 ill
1 In lii'iliil'l'ililllililillil 'ill Hi I ...... I ...... Ill '
-------
FII r r-
!LE i
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
9592.1995(01)
AU6 1 0 1995
OFFICE OF
SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
Frederick S. Phillips
2300 N Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20037-1128
Dear Mr. Phillips:
This letter is in response to your letter of May 25, 1995 concerning the management
of the used oil in your clients' industrial facilities.
Specifically, your clients want to reduce the volume of the used coolant by either
filtering out or evaporating off the water before the remaining used coolant is managed by
rerefining o^ fuel-blending. Dewatering the used coolant will reduce the volume of the
coolant wastestream by as much as 90 percent. Your clients would like clarification as to
whether dewatering is a process that triggers EPA's Used Oil Processor requirements.
Dewatenng of an oil-based coolant does not require the owners/operators of an
industrial facility to follow the Used Oil Processor requirements as long as dewatering of the
oil-based coolant removes the water and does not change the physical and chemical condition
of the oil-based portion of the coolant. Dewatering, as described in your letter, would meet
the exemption from the Used Oil Processor requirements as described in §279.20
(b)(2)(ii)(D), "Draining or otherwise removing used oil from materials containing used oil...
in order to remove excessive oil..." •
In your letter you. indicated that after dewatering, the oil is sent "to be re-refined or
fuel-blended." It is important to remember that the exemption from the Used Oil Processor
requirements is contingent upon the oil being generated on-site and not sent directly to an
off-site burner, see §279.20(b)(2)(iii). Sending the remaining coolant to a rerefiner and
fuel-blender, as mentioned in your letter, would meet this requirement; however, shipment to
an off-site burner would cause the generator to become regulated ty the Used Oil Processor
requirements.
Recycled/Recyclable
r\ <\ Printed with Soy/Canola Ink on piper th«t
VS<~7
-------
i in 11111 ii i n nil • i n i n ill •
i I
I
Thank you for sharing your clients' concerns with us. I hope this letter clarifies the
issues you raised. If you have any additional questions, please contact Tracy Bone at
(202)260-3509.
Sincerely,
Michael Petruska, Chief
Regulatory Development Branch
i||,lil ifH ,i !< Jjillllllliliililili'i' il IF' •JllllllII;,. ill' llll'IIPILillhllll nniiijliiii „ !|llilllll!i||illlll!|lli;;:i 'UlWIlUili ', Jill...'!!!! ,,? r" Jllll!"1 HI II ,„!'' ^ilLll'/'inliLillil ijllilill 11' '!'".|'' lluli lllniilBih'''!',!!! 11 1'P'lii' i 'j" !;||P|HH11'S 'I'lll1 niiiHIHi1 ii l| illlllllllilll niii,„« liUlllllllliiliHIIlL , ll!!"lh, 'Ul! HSLfenA ,;i
• ii. i ii Jiiiiiii'i'1 Pi w'iiik i liiiit < i"" i 'i* si'"' '< i imii
M i! . ie
^ iiw^^ Iii
,,'; •,', ,„; |,: n\l\t IL! ii 'ili'T'iir! .'niilillllinli" 'H Ml '( f \ ! ,.i 1 !!' I iii'»lf :SA\f ,llihlililllirMI|i||< '!'" Ullllhlliir'll!:! HI1'!!" '' iPF Illll1! II! Wlnh I il'l'l
h 1 Jlli|||ii l|||,llll,I",iliil|i ''HIPIFli'll' ''
i;: V' i!!;i •Ijlli11' il illillil! Illlff1 oiM
"Hi1" 1111111 IPtH" i:; ''ip'iiiii'iH1 :|ii i'i . Pii'NHPiii i::rii'i'"i" "m BV iiii!1*.;'»:"•, ;t: wen'A a
liiiiiiii ii.liliipriipiiiiii, 'iJiiiijiiiiiiiiiiiiir
',',ii"'':.,' ,'iil'P'HP1,: L r J)11; lilii1" Jiii:!,; • 'i
!!i!:$"fJR^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
*!. ' llli "':• '.i'"'!1" 'l!' \ i'!';1 X- t}:b'^'^li>'Wy'
•'•• v tnfc'^h^/IF1^ R :iiMF.'iv i^iir^'
Fjji:. 'I'll!1:"!! '•• ™. »J: , t'ii: •";!'«" "iiiii'ii'iiii""i,:,:::I:';i;'ii Yj&i'^ vrnw^i^5, i^^^'iiSiaiSffNiiWiiiw" fitfiifiil^'i""^
HH^^^^ iiRll
^M^^^KW^^^^&^MX^XM
\m\vmL" "i" liiii': •" iis' ;i,,;; iiiSfliiiilir:1 iAiS "i i • •*;• 1 "ifi's; •'(:*• '*:«"' '.i^wniu^!'. itef ;iii»'i':ii«"ii,
'
^ 'M ' ui1' :;
^^^^ iii:i •;i:":; ti
'•'E:.l¥ '(aii!
-------
(302)
SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE
2300 N STREET. N.W.
WASHINGTON. O.C. 2OO37-1128
(202) 663-8000
FACSIMILE
<2O2) 663-8OO7
May 25,1995
Director, Office of Solid Waste
United States Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street, S.W. '
Washington, D.C. 20460
Re: Application of Used Oil Processor Requirements Under
the Tfaed Oil Management Standards. 40 C.F.R. Part 279
NUE
NEW •VOMK. NEW •VOAK 1OO22-«72a
ia01 KM4M CREDIT DRIVE
MCLEAN. VIRGINIA 22102-0000
118 SOUTH UNION STREET
ALEXANDRIA. VIRGINIA 22314-3M1
j zoi LIBERTY s i REfc i. s.w.
/UE8BURQ. VIRGINIA 22O7S-2721
Dear Ms. Lovrance: . .
I write on behalf of several clients seeking clarification regarding the application of
the used oil processor regulations (40 C.F.R. § 279, Subpart F) to industrial facilities that
employ evaporation and/or filtrationjp minimize the volume of their oil-based coolant
wastestreams. EPA's position on this issue will likely have significant consequences for
thousands of users of oil-based coolants.
Many machine shops and other industrial facilities use coolants composed of 90-96%
water and 4-10% petroleum-based (or synthetic oil based) cooling compound. The used
coolant must be drained and replaced regularly, producing a sizeable wastestream. To
minimize the volume of their used-coolant wastestreams, many facilities have installed, or
are contemplating installing, evaporation and/or filtration systems. The purpose of these
systems is to evaporate or filter out the water component of the coolant, thus reducing by
90% or more the oil-based wastestream to be recycled or disposed. Most clients employing
such systems report that their dewatered coolant is picked up by Clean Harbors, Safety
Kleen, or a similar entity to be re-refined or fuel-blended.
The evaporation and filtration processes at issue are being employed to
the
volume, and thus the expense of managing, the coolant wastestream. This action constitutes
"a basic step that is incidental or ancillary to a primary activity," in this case reducing waste
volume, "that is distinct from used oil processing" (59 Fed. Reg. 10550, 10556). These
activities are not designed to "make used oil more amenable for production of fuel oils,
lubricants, or other used-oil derived products" (40 C.F.R. § 279.50) and should not be subject
1
-------
: "SHAW, PiTTMAN, POTTS &
A PARTMf MIHIP metUDIMO PROFMSIONAt CORPORATION*
•illllll 1 I- lit1'Iv1' ' It'7' if'lf•'' IlllllfFt lili t,lilinii''•••111!,'iiiitill!",!dil?',:HtihiQtAS IBSP: I! Iki "a ijSi:?.: "':,H'Ik'i.;:!:" t'J il,t";t':1', JMH:';I',* ' fSFM !• lllllli: Illtl'lii-,:
Ms. Sylvia K. towraiice
May 25,1995
Page 2
to the used oil processor requirements. However, because EPA's amendment of the processor
provisions (59 Esd- Reg. 10550, el SSQ.) does not specifically address evaporation and/or
filtration of water to reduce the volume of an oil-based wastestream, we are requesting this
clarification from the Agency.
* • _
- ;;iii-i ;r-;; ^ t- •; ;;; Qe|||||or| wJ|Q d^^^r^kpj^^^ifiopJajaX wastestreams do^rso,to minimize the
volume of the wastestream and thereby simplify wastestream management. Imposing the
used oil processor requirements on generators who minimize their waste by evaporation
and/or filtration creates a powerful disincentive to do so and runs contrary to EPA's stated
goal of waste minimization.
i '!! ttSs!***™!! iapjjreciate your consideration "and look forward to learning your views on the
, j applicability of the used oil processor requirements to the described activities.' Please do,not
if I can provide additional information or if you would like to discuss this
iJlinilliii :^^^ IIIIII1IIIII|IIH . n> w i « ir i \jiii i T"i_i-..J - -• ..I. C* Tll.*11*^.
;•(• Hiiiifw^^^^^^ rreaenckS. Phillips
MilM It:!!'11!:: M:\!liK!!iLV!i^
!=^^^^^^^^ : Sheila McC. Harvey, Esq.
M. McQueen1
! 167099
ijjil. ."'i'l ..... j ijiiiiS^^^^^^^^^^^
WHH ........ SS!i"n" ''•jlHftl^ir! ..... Si11! ...... IR
" !!.:i!' Km lllliilJF'illlllK JKtWlV^^ ' lllBlin I , iiilliili' ' ! '.' 'I .• > It W«,;'! niiiill;*' < iia / IJHU ''Hit II" tRIIIK^^^^ iliKiiJIlF FF';
-------
UNITED STATES ENVJRONIIENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
9592.1995(02)
flJG 2b 895
KW L ^ . OFFICEOF
SOLD WASTE AND EMERGENCY
RESPONSE
Norman H. Nosenchuck, P.E-
Director
Division of Hazardous Substances Regulation
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
50 Wolf Road
Albany, New York 12233-7250
Dear Mr. Nosenchuck:
This letter is hi response to your letter of May 24, 1995 concerning (heexeinption for
burning used oil in space heaters found in the Fedei^ Used C« Mamgement Standards.
In your letter you request EPA's interpretation of the regulatory exemption for
burning used oil in space heaters in three specific used oil collection scenarios. The
scenarios all involve a county highway maintenance garage accepting additional used oil to
burn in a on-site space heater. The used oil is collected by the ^^^ ^^^^
maintenance facilities, County-run Do-it-yourselfer (DIY) collection centers.and from
SSST$£^^
these three sources of used oil in their space heater and still qualify for the space heater
exemption in 40 CFR 279.23(a)(l)).
A generator may only bum used oil from DIYs or oil generated by mat generator. A
^Stt^rtwaa****^**™- EPA never intended to limit
to burning only used oil generated at the same facility as the spaceheater. An
naTburn used oil generated from another of the generator's facility as long
i Jrispace heater meet all the requirements of §279.23. Certainly, your state
be more stringent than EPA as reflected in (he Used Oil Management
Standards.
TTje first two scenarios clearly meet the intent of the exemption which jf j°
generators to bum their own used oil in space heaters and to encourage to*&t
u^doil. 11« owner/operator, in this case a county aggregation P°rt'*^°™*
utld oil from other County facilities and the DIY collection program as long
SSws the requirements for self-transportation of 55 gallons or less «sed oil (see §279-24
-------
capacity of not more than 0.5 million BTU per hour, that the combustion gases are vented to
the ambient air, and that the space heater is operated as legitimate recycling (i.e., operated
during cold weather and business hours).
The third scenario, concerning the burning of used oil at the County collection center
from businesses, does not meet the language or the intent of the exemption. The
owner/operator is limited to burning self-generated used oil and used oil from household
sources (DIY). No' amount of business waste (om^ than me used oil generated by the
owner/operator of the space heater) may be burned in a space heater. In your letter, you
referred to an exemption based on a 55 gallon limit that would allow the used oil to be
burned in space heaters. This exemption applies to generators self-transporting their used oil
to an aggregation center and exempts the generator from Transportation Standards (Subpart
E) only and has no impact on the burning of used oil in space heaters.
I hope this information has been helpful to you. If you have any additional questions,
your staff may contact Tracy Bone at (202)260-3509. Thank you for your interest in used oil
'" management"'' ! .• '
Sincerely,
, Director
>f Solid Waste
-------
/ ( 3* Michael D. Zagata
Commissioner
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
'SO VJott Road, Albany. New York 12233-7250
518-457-6934 FAX 518-457-0629
(l^.£>
Of
MAY 2 41995
Mr. Michael Shapiro
Director
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street, S.W.
Washington, DC 20460
Dear Mr. Shapiro:
Re: Exemption for Burning Used Oil in Space Heaters
Enclosed is a copy of a February 6, 1995 letter that we
received from Ms. Auralie Ashley-Marx, a Research and Compliance
Coordinator in Oswego County (one of the Counties in New York
State), concerning the referenced exemption.
Mr. William Mirabile, of this Department, brought up this
issue with you at the Used Oil Roundtable in March, 1995, at
which time you stated that this issue would r>e evaluated by the
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at some
future point in time.
Our interpretation'of the applicability of the regulations
for burners of used oil is predicated on the assumption that,
once a generator or other party who intends to direct their used
oil for burning determines that the used oil is on-specification,
then such on-specification used oil is no longer regulated as
used oil (40 CFR 279.11). In other words, transportation and
destination are no longer regulated under the used oil
regulations.
Therefore, based on the above assumption, the following is
our interpretation for each of the scenarios presented in the
Ms. Ashley-Marx letter:
1. Used oil that is sent from off-site County highway
maintenance garages to other, off-site, highway garages
or the off-site airport maintenance facilityf all of
which are owned and operated by the County;
In this case, we believe that the receiving facilities
would be acting as used oil aggregation points.
However, since the heading to the space heater
exemption in 40 CFR 279.23 says "On-site burning in
space heaters," we do not believe that aggregation
points could burn the used oil brought in from their -
own off-site facilities unless the used oil is
-------
f iliilliti ; ! •'ill*:, /Wild ...... !,i, i, 'ii •• ' IIIIIIF!; '.'Plif ft ...... WIKl !: , IIMIM^ lllllIK ..... :RM 3IMKIH; JWlf ! • M ...... Ill . • H If <;::;il ' * '.: t !" ..... iiaililK ..... iF'li! ....... 14 I'M ..... 1. "1 • ....... i'iiTl! ..... -IK1 '!":* IBM 'I '""< , i* •«* SUMWaWjar "' ' ',, JfUBfa? , 'It - *3^i"lOSIimi^i: ''liillilfl1:'1 , ;.! .Uliilll
i' ;;» * >'» * "n:; • • ..... - .:„"' 'i
- '.'''. '"'1 ,' !.'" '•s''j'.''' • 1 'r '-•• '. l| .' 1'
Michael Shapiro 2<
1:19*111 jifl;. ll 111 I 1 1 ..... M II II 111 1111 I il n 111 1 I II i in if i III I) ill i li HIM i ill i in (ill
'if:1' If ;;!",;; ; ..................... ,.,.. .................................. . .......................... ....... pn-specification. Although New York State's used oil
:;;;;.:::: .... ......... ,:::::,:; ...... :;:; ::;::::: :§?d air regulations are somewhat different from 40 CFR
II ..... It fc B§?'WJBiSE ^^hd **% f?fther Pff fiude aggregation points
' fMPg used oil,- we will reevaluate our position
determine that aggregation points may burn used
from their own off-site facilities under the terms
' I"",
'«:- ••:- •-;": : <™ »*2L» Used oil that is sent from County-i^
iDIY> used oil collection eenteyg to other, off-sifce
gountv maintenance facilities? all locations are
and oerated bv the County; .
- .............. ---In this instance/ we believe that the used oil could be
....... at the ...... DIX used .............. oil ............... collection centers under the
zi::;,^SS3fiS ............... Pf t^t ............. space heater exemption . However , if the
f=! used oil were sent off-site to other County facilities
for burning, we believe that the used oil would need to
5? on-specificationo Again, if your interpretation is
different, we will reevaluate our position on this
issue. For this particular scenario, we believe that
if the space heater exemption in' 40 CFR Part 279
applies, there might be a possibility of granting a
variance from State regulations to allow this type of
burning, pj^bi^ We would particularly like to
facilitate recycling of DIY used oil.
3 • g ed oil that is sent fron
County maintenance faeilittee;
regulations allow for "used oil collection
centers»" which receive used oil from generators in
quantities of 55 gallons or less to meet the same
standards as used oil generators. This Department's
used oil regulations do not have a similar provision
for used oil collection centers. Therefore, the used
oil received at County maintenance facilities from
private businesses for burning must be on-
sPe<5ification. However, we are interested in finding
ill ............. IfeSther, under 40 CFR Part 279, used oil collection
centers (e.g., those that accept used oil from •
[[[ generators in shipments of no more than 55 gallons)
would be allowed to burn such used oil under the space
heater exemption.
Is our interpretation of the used oil regulation concerning
the above scenarios correct, or does EPA have a different
We need to know in order to advise the County
-------
Mr. Michael Shapiro
If you have any questions, or require any further
information, please have your staff contact Ms. Michelle Ching,
of my staff, at (518) 485-8988.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Norman H. Nosenchuck, P.E.
Director
Division of Hazardous Substances
Regulation
Enclosure
cc: w/enc. - A. Ashley-Marx, Oswego County
Eydie Pines, USEPA, Washington, D.C.
-------
i— . fj^ '•'•*• • DONALD F;MOREY
OSWEGO COUNTY
DEPARJMENT'OF PUBLIC WORKS • ' MARK LICHTENSTEIN
le& Sett/(Out/ BRISTOL HILL SOLID WASTE FAOLriiEs ' . '
February 6, 1995
•
i
"Ms. Michelle Clung ' . . " • •
'Hazardous Waste Compliance Unit ••
' .NYSDEC ' '
. Albany, NY 12233-17253
* ' '
• RE:. Clarification of Used Oil Space Heater Regulations
ill 1 1 III III I III ip • I in* nun i in inn mi ill in i n nun in ill in nil i in i iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiii i n in in n i n iiiiiiiH ....... iifii'iihuu''''!!!!!!,'!.)! ....... ...... * ...... • ....... ,,.| ..... WMU ...... tn\\h ^^ 't .......... m, ...... ...... ........ ...... : ..................... ......................... : •, , , , • * • . * .•
..................................... " ...... ' Dear Ms. Ching: '' • " . : '••'.- •' ''••'•••
• * .' "' ..'.' • ': .................... '--. ........................... :-• •• ..... = ' .................... - .......... , ........ : ..... '- • ' , . • . •
• As discussed by phone last month, I have been asked .to research and provide specific
documentation in reference' to the use of used motor oil in space heaters. ' Oswego
County is considering using' used motor oil for fuel in space heaters to heat'several
• highway garage facilities and/or an airport maintenance bay. TTie used oil could
; potentially come, from the following sources: • • .
..................................... ' ....................... ...... :"!''" ! ....................... : ...... ......................... " ................................ " ............... " ....... ' "" . " • "; .............. " ".-.'•'. '•'•.' .;'• "' ' \. .......... -* ••'' '
* 'Several off-site, County highway maintenance garages. ; ' ' ; ' .
• . • Five off-site transfer station holding" tanks that accept used motor oil
frofex household, do-it yourself oil changers". Each person .leaving oil signs a
certification sheet stating thfct the used oil is from a household and not a
*. , -, business, It is not possible to have residents deliver their used crank-
" , / cas.e oil -to highway garages, as it is not as. convenient, nor is staff
.- . , available at those i sites to monitor such- activities.
.• Used oil from off-site businesses, • ' . ' . ' . .
What specific regulatory requirements would apply to each -of these activities? What
st?P? would the County be required to take to insure that we are in compliance with all
applicfime state and federal regulations: -Thank you for your 'attention to this matter. '
Any ' information you can, provide would be appreciated. Tf you need further information
about my request please contact me during business hours at (315) 593-8924.
Sincerely,- • .;•
-Auralie Ashley-
Research and Compliance. Coordinator
315*S93"3850 ' • R,R.#4BOXl06.FULTON.NEWyoRKl»069-' ', / ' 315-593*8923
' . <:. -. •
-------
HOTLINE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
• •• ' 9593.1995(01)
December 1995
RCRA
1. Lead-Acid Batteries and Universal
Waste
How do the Pan 273, Standards far
Universal Waste Management, affect the
management of lead-acid batteries regulated
under the Part 266, Subpart G, regulations for
spent lead-acid batteries being reclaimed?
«
Lead-add batteries that are managed under
Pan 266, Subpart G, are not subject to the
universal waste management standards. The"-
universal management standards only apply to
those lead-acid batteries that are not managed
under Part 266, Subpart G. The existing
recycling program for automotive lead-acid
batteries has been extremely successful, with
recycling rates in excess of 90 percent -
nationwide. By retaining the Pan 266,
Subpart G, requirements. EPA can continue
to operate this program without modification
or adverse effecr on the environment EPA
expects that most non-automotive lead-acid
batteries will be managed under Part 273 (60
ER 25492,25505; May 11,1995),
-------
Illlllllllll 111 I 1111 I IIIIIII IIIIIII III
ijllllll II I 111 III
I
•nil ill nil nil iiiiiii
mi iiiiiii ii i
in i 11 iiiiiii in 11 i i
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
i
i
!i!;!!!!:!!:;;!!!)l'!§!!ii:!!!i!!! I,:!1:1!':"1!:1!"1':' feiiiiiiiiiiii'ii^
. i 'iiifiii' < , i: ,iii i ijiiiiiiiiiiiiiin! in• inin,,, ;'" ihUh, i inii'i nin." ,i:n n liiiiiiiiiiii HUH „ ' i iiiiini < i<;i M. nn n m i., . 'uni i* im,«• '"Uki'Tin i i» < i i ' f ,1»;« mi i<,,, .iiiN, < i1: , • :• jnn i" ":> ,i i :ii ' x > J\.' ,i iiiniii:«ij ii'," y, in: a UK i«mi liiiiiiiiiiiiiFiEJippii' ,:i i IF: • .'im»" TII*, ' i^iiiiin'ii' *; i> n' 1:1 ,,II:IIIIIIIIIIIIIIH „, iPiiiiii'ijk/ i, .', iiHiiiiii jui'iiiii
liLiJliiJHi11', i>,I' nili C llnnnniKili'PELi'iFP'iiiii , Fllllllipp'i:, IF;' FFFIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIF ' flllllllFli 1 [ij l<.'„„!', ISl;,;,:»'::*,;; EURIi,:, "IJ Ill in1"11' ""f 'I Ml1?" "T!" i< /'Piifti , "I!"», ]:rW f Vlji «""",""" |' i;|;iijp t jn ^il!;1.:!!!!! u iHjii,;::; ;i:'i» iiif aujindw l;!!!!^1!:!!!!!! ^.; Bttj*1. w J|: f iiaiii:»" •"; {'!;'': ] \ JA t\ ii;ii'!:> iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii^iiiiiiiiijiii: iiiiiiiiiimijjiiiiiiiiil'!'' iiiiimiiiiiijiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii!,,! ::iiI,:ii: \:!'>!!|1 ">::i':>'' " '!::>:!>:"!!!!>>"
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiijiiieiijiijiiy liiiiiiiiii^iiiiijjipiiiiiiiiii!:;;;:!]!!^,!^ m m^\ riiDiii:!!:!"'!! 11: ^ v .M"^ i^r^ii^'^siiiiji'jpi^'^jfij!^ iiiiiidiiiiiiiisiiiidiiif^iii'riiiiq^ 'lir'^tii^fiiM":!' .'•iiiis;!!;::.'!!!!1'' f•;?w ^vimrinur:;r \mm
liii'iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiniii .|i iii, fiifppi i|>i ii|||: i||p i ,•, 11, i, 'iiipiiiFaii1 "iiiii: in t "iiiNa""1)! ;ii w, 'w v\ifiit t • iibiiiii •, in f \ n r, fi '.u iniiii1 IFIIHF , Hi1 iiriii i; • r:n "PJII :>," »f TI n i;, | •»«\ m , I'l" i.. T F11"1!"!1::*"1 'Pin'tiiipi i, JSM \ j 'y, iiiiiiiiiiiii."^ i, i. i i \;>..B| i FiUiiFiaii inn' ',: "i:11 iiiiiiiii^iiii;ii
------- |