United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Solid Waste and
Emergency Response
(53O5W)
EPA530-R-99-001A
May 1993
www.epa.go v/os w
Appendices to the Guide
for Industrial Waste
Management
Buildirt
Partnerships
"•••*-vJL
Protecting
Ground Water
Surface Waterf
Air
) Printed on paper that contains at least 3O percent postcops^tjmer fiber
ft,,.,.' i
-------
-------
Proposed Guide For Industrial Waste
Management For Public Comment
Appendices
EPA530-R-99-001A
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
401 M Street, SW
Washington, DC 20460
1999
-------
-------
BUILDING PARTNERSHIPS
APPENDICES
-------
Building Partnerships—Appendices
Appendix I: State Solid Waste Contacts
ALABAMA
Department of Environmental Management
CADEM)
Land Division
P.O. Box 301463
Montgomery, AL 36130-1463
Phone: 334 271-7730
Fax: 334 279-3050
Web site: •www.adem.state.al.us
Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation
Solid Waste Management
ADEC Division of Environmental Health
410 Willoughby Avenue, Suite 105
Juneau, AK 99801-1795
Phone: 907 465-5162
Fax: 907 465-5164
Web site: www.state.ak.us/local/akpages/
env.conserv/dec_div.htrn
Arizona Department of Environmental
Quality
Waste Programs Division
3033 North Central Avenue, # 3048
Phoenix, AZ 85012
Phone: 602 207-4865
Fax: 602 207-2383
Web site: www.adeq.state.az.tis/index.htm.
Arkansas Department of Pollution Control
and Ecology
Solid Waste Management Division
P.O. Box 8913
Little Rock, AR 72219
Phone: 501 682-0600
Fax: 501 682-0565
Web site: www.adeq.state.ar.us/solwaste/
main.htm
California Integrated Waste Management
Board
8800 Cal Center Drive
Sacramento, CA 95826
Phone: 916 255-2200 or 800 553-2962
Fax: 916 255-2220
Web site: www.ciwmb.ca.gov
California Department of Conservation
Recycling Market Development
801 K Street, MS 18-55
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: 916 327-2760
Fax: 916 324-1224
Web site: www.consrv.ca.gov
Colorado Department of Public Health and
Environment
HMWMD-B2
4300 Cherry Creek Drive South
Denver, CO 80246-1530
Phone: 303 692-3300
Fax: 303 759-5355
Web site: www.state.co.us/gov_dir/
cdphe_du/hm/hmhom.html
Connecticut Department of Environmental
Protection
Waste Management Bureau
Office of Recycling and Source Reduction
79 Elm Street
Hartford, CT 06106-5127
Phone: 860 424-3021
Fax: 860 424-4060
Web site: dep.state.ct.us
A1-2
-------
Building Partnerships—Appendices
Appendix I: State Solid Waste Contacts (cont.)
Delaware Department of Natural Resources
and Environmental Control
Division of Air and Waste Management
89 Kings Highway
P.O. Box 1401
Dover, DE 19903
Phone: 302 739-6400
Fax: 302 739-5060
Web site: www.dnrec.state.de.us
Florida Department of Environmental
Protection
Division of Waste Management
2600 Blair Stone Road
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400
Phone: 850 488-0300
Fax: 850 921-8061
Web site: www2.dep.state.fi.us/waste/
programs.htm
Georgia Department of Natural Resources
7 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive, Suite 450
Atlanta, GA 30334
Phone: 404 651-5120
Fax: 404 651-5130
Web site: www.dnr.state.ga.us/dnr
Hawaii Department of Health.
Office of Solid Waste Management
919 Ala Moana Boulevard
Honolulu, HI 96814
Phone: 808 586-4240
Fax: 808 586-7509
Web site: www.hawaii.gov/health/ei/
emsw/eiemswOO.htm
Idaho Division of Environmental Quality
1410 North Hilton
Boise, ID 83706
Phone: 208 373-0502
Fax: 208 373-0169
Web site: www2.state.id.us/deq
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
1021 North Grand Avenue East
Springfield, IL 62702
Phone: 217 782-3397'
Web site: www.epa.state.il.us
Illinois Recycling Association
P.O. Box 3717
Oak Park, IL 60303-3717
Phone: 708 358-0050
Fax: 708 358-0051
Indiana Department of Environmental
Management
Office of Solid & Hazardous Waste
Management
P.O. Box 6015
Indianapolis, IN 46206-6015
Phone: 317 233-3656 or 800 451-6027
(in Indiana)
Fax: 317 232-3403
Web site: www.ai.orgAdem/oshwm/
index-html
Iowa Department of Natural Resources
Environmental Protection Division
Wallace State Office Building
900 East Grand Avenue
Des Moines, IA 50319-0034
Phone: 515 281-6284
Web site: www.state.ia.us/government/
dnr/organiza/epd/index.htm
A1-3
-------
Building Partnerships—Appendices
Appendix I: State Solid Waste Contacts (cont.)
Kansas Department of Health and
Environment
Forbes Field, Building 740
Topeka, KS 66620
Phone: 785 296-1600
Fax: 785 296-1592
Web site: www.state.ks.us/kdhe/waste
Kentucky Department for Environmental
Protection
Division of Waste Management
14 Reilly Road
Frankfort, KY 40601
Phone: 502 564-6716
Fax: 502 564-4049
Web site: www.state.ky.us/agencies/
nrepcAvaste/dwmhome.htrn
Louisiana Department of Environmental
Quality
Office of Waste Services
P.O. Box 82178
Baton Rouge, LA. 70884-2178
Phone: 225 765-0355
Fax: 225 765-0617
Web site: www.deq.state.la.us/wel
come.htm,
Maine Department of Environmental
Protection
17 State House Station
Augusta, ME 04333-0017
Phone: 207 287-7688 or 800 452-1942
Web site: www.state.me.us/dep/
mdephome.htm
Maryland Department of the Environment
2500 Broening Highway
Baltimore, MD 21224
Phone: 410 631-3315 or 800 633-6100
Fax: 410 631-3842
Web site: www.mde.state.md.us
Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection
Division of Solid Waste Management
1 Winter Street, Fourth Floor
Boston, MA 02108
Phone: 617 338-2255 or 800 462-0444
(in Massachusetts)
Web site: www.state.ma.us/dep
Michigan Department of Environmental
Quality
Waste Management Division
John Hannah Building, First Floor
608 West Allegan Street
P.O. Box 30241
Lansing, MI 48933
Phone: 517 373-2730
Fax: 517 373-4797
Web site: www.deq.state.mi.us/wmd
Minnesota Office of Environmental
Assistance
520 Lafayette Road North, Second Floor
St. Paul, MN 55155-4100
Phone: 651 296-3417 or 800 657-3843
Fax: 651 215-0246
Web site: www.moea.state.mn.us
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
520 Lafayette Road North
St. Paul, MN 55155-4194
Phone: 612 296-6300 or 800 657-3864
Fax: 612 296-8717
Web site: www.pca.state.mn.us
A1-4
-------
Building Partnerships—Appendices
Appendix I: State Solid Waste Contacts (cont.)
Mississippi Department of Environmental
Quality
EO. Box 20305
Jackson, MS 39289-1305
Phone: 601 961-5171
Fax: 601 961-5349
Web site: www.deq.state.ms.us/
domino/deqweb.nsf
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Quality
Solid Waste Management Program
P. O. Box 176
Jefferson City, MO 65102
Phone: 573 751-5401
Web site: www.dnr.state.mo.us/deq/
swmp/homeswmp.htm
Montana Department of Environmental
Quality
Solid Waste Program
P.O. Box 200901
Helena, MT 59620-0901
Phone: 406 444-5307
Fax: 406 444-6836
Web site: www.deq.mt.gov
Nebraska Department of Environmental
Quality
1200 N Street, Suite 400
P.O. Box 98922
Lincoln, NE 68509-8922
Phone: 402 471-2186
Fax: 402 471-2909
Web site: www.deq.state.ne.us
Nevada Division of Environmental
Protection
Solid Waste Branch
333 West Nye Lane
Carson City, NV 89706-0851
Phone: 702 687-4670
Fax: 702 687-6396
New Hampshire Department of
Environmental Services
6 Hazen Drive
Concord, NH 03302-0095
Phone: 603 271-2900
Fax: 603 271-2456
Web site: www.state.nh.us/des
New Jersey Department of Environmental
Protection
Division of Solid Waste Management
401 East State Street, 7th Floor,
East Wing
P.O. Box 402
Trenton, NJ 08625-0402
Phone: 609 292-2885
Fax: 609 292-7695
Web site: www.state.nj.us/dep
New Mexico Environmental Department
Harold S. Runnels Building
1190 St. Francis Drive
Santa Fe, NM 87505-4182
Phone: 505 827-2855 or 800 879-3421
Web site: www.nmenv.state.nm.us
A1-5
-------
Building Partnerships—Appendices
Appendix I: Technical Assistance Organizations (cont.)
New York Department of Environmental
Conservation
Division of Solid and Hazardous Materials
50 Wolf Road
Albany, NY 12233-7253
Phone: 518 457-6934
Fax: 518 457-1283
Web site: •www.dec.state.ny.tis/website/
poUun"on/index.html
North. Carolina Department of
Environmental Health, and Natural
Resources
Solid Waste Section
401 Oberlin Road, Suite 150
Raleigh, NC 27605
Phone: 919 733-0692
Web site: wastenot.ehnr.state.nc.-us/
swhome/swhome.htm
North Dakota Department of Health.
Division of Waste Management
Solid Waste Program
P.O. Box 5520
1200 Missouri Avenue, Room 302
Bismarck, ND 58506-5520
Phone: 701 328-5153
Fax: 701 28-5200
Web site: www.ehs.healui.state.nd.tis/
ndhd/environ/wrn/swpAndex.htm.
State of Ohio Environmental Protection
Agency
Division of Solid and Infectious Waste
Management's (DSIWM)
1800 Watermark Drive
P.O. Box 1049
Columbus, OH 43216-1049
Phone: 614 644-2621
Fax: 614 728-5315
Web site: www.epa.state.oh.us/dsiwrn/
dsiwrnafn.html
Ohio Department of Natural Resources
Division of Recycling & Litter Prevention
Fountain Square, Building F-2
Columbus, OH 43224
Phone: 614 265-6333
Fax: 614 262-9387
Web site: www.dnr.state.oh.us/odnr/
recycling
Oklahoma Department of Environmental
Quality
Waste Management, Recycling, and Waste
Reduction
707 North Robinson
P.O. Box 1677
Oklahoma City, OK 73101-1677
Phone: 405 271-5338
Fax: 405 271-8425
Web site: www.deq.state.ok.us
Oregon Department of Environmental
Quality
Solid Waste Policy and Program
Development Section
811 SW. Sixth Avenue
Portland, OR 97204
Phone: 503 229-5913 or 880 452-4011
Fax: 503 229-6954
Web site: www.deq.state.or.us/wmc/
solwaste/rsw.htm
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental
Resources
EO. Box 8472
Harrisburg, PA 17105-8472
Phone: 717 787-7382
Fax: 717 787-1904
Web site: www.dep.state.pa.us
A1-6
-------
Building Partnerships—Appendices
Appendix I: Technical Assistance Organizations (cont.)
Rhode Island Department of
Environmental Management
235 Promenade Street
Providence, RI 02908
Phone: 401 277-3434
Fax: 401 277-2591
Web site: www.state.ri.us/dem
South Carolina Department of Health and
Environmental Control
Environmental Quality Control
2600 Bull Street
Columbia, SC 29201
Phone: 803 734-5360
Fax: 803 734-4901
Web Site: www.state.sc.us/dhec/
eqchome.htm
South Dakota Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
523 East Capitol Avenue
Pierre, SD 57501
Phone: 605 773-3153
Fax: 605 773-6035
Web site: www.state.sd.us/denr/denr.html
Tennessee Department of Environment and
Conservation
Division of Solid Waste Assistance
L & C Tower, 14th Floor
401 Church Street
Nashville, TN 37243-0455
Phone: 615 532-0070
Web site: www.state.tn.us/environ-
ment/swa
Texas Natural Resource Conservation
Commission
Office of Waste Management
P.O. Box 13087
Austin, TX 78711-3087
Phone: 512 239-5200
Fax: 512 239-5151
Web site: www.tnrcc.texas.gov/waste
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
P.O. Box 144810-4810
168 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-4810
Phone: 801 536-4400 or 800 458-0145
Fax: 801 536-4401
Web site: www.eq.state.ut.us
Vermont Agency of Natural Resources
Environmental Assistance
103 South Main Street
Waterbury, VT 05671-0411
Phone: 802 241-3477
Fax: 802 241-3273
Web site: www.anr.state.vt.us/waste.htm
Virginia Department of Environmental
Quality
629 East Main Street
P.O. Box 10009
Richmond, VA 23240-0009
Phone: 804 698-4000 or 800 592-5482
(in Virginia)
Fax: 804 698-4453
Web site: www.deq.state.va.us/deq/
homepage.html
A1-7
-------
Building Partnerships—Appendices
Appendix I: Technical Assistance Organizations (cont.)
Washington Department of Ecology
Solid Waste Services Program.
P.O. Box 47600
Olympia, WA 98504-7600
Phone: 360 407-7455
Fax: 360 407-6102
Web site: -www.wa.gov/ecology
West Virginia Bureau of Environment
Solid Waste Management Board
1615 Washington Street, East
Charleston, WV 25311-2126
Phone: 304 558-0844
Fax: 304 558-0899
Web site: www.state.wv.us/swmb
Wisconsin Department of Natural
Resources
Bureau of Solid and Hazardous Waste
Management
P.O. Box 7921
Madison, Wl 53707-7921
Phone:608266-2111
Fax: 608 267-2768
Web site: www.dnr.state.wLus
Wyoming Department of Environmental
Quality
Solid and Hazardous Waste Division
250 Lincoln Street
Lander, WY 82520
Phone: 307 332-6924
Fax: 307 332-7726
Web site: deq.state.wy.us
A1-8
-------
Building Partnerships—Appendices
Appendix II: Examples of Public Involvement Activities
1. CMA's Responsible Care*
To address citizens' concerns about the
manufacture, transport, use, and disposal
of chemical products, the Chemical
Manufacturers Association (CMA) launched
its Responsible Care® program in 1988.
One of the guiding principles of the pro-
gram is recognizing and responding to
community concerns about chemicals and
facility operations. CMA is committed to
fostering an open dialogue with residents
of the communities in which member com-
panies are located.
To maintain their membership in CMA
companies must participate in the
Responsible Care® program. In addition,
the program establishes a public advisory
panel that helps CMA identify community
concerns and suggests ways to resolve
those concerns. The panel currently com-
prises 15 members, including representa-
tives from both public and private sectors.
The number of industry members is kept
to a minimum to ensure that a balance of
voices will be heard.
Member companies are required to
address community concerns in two ways:
(1) by developing and maintaining com-
munity outreach programs, and (2) by
assuring that each facility has an emergency
response program in place. For example,
member companies must provide informa-
tion about their waste minimization and
emissions reduction activities, as well as
provide convenient ways for citizens to
become familiar with the facility, such as
tours. Companies must also develop writ-
ten emergency response plans that include
information about how to communicate
with members of the public and consider
their needs after an emergency.
Responsible Care® is just one example of
how public involvement principles can be
incorporated into everyday business prac-
tices. The program also shows how involv-
ing the public makes good business sense.
For more information about Responsible
Care®, contact CMA at 703 741-5000.
2. AF&PA's Sustainable Forestry Initiative
Public concern about the future of
America's forests coupled with the
American Forest & Pape'r Association's
(AF&PA's) belief that "sound environmental
policy and sound business practice go hand
in hand" fueled the establishment of the
Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI).
Established in 1995, the SFI outlines princi-
ples and objectives for environmental stew-
ardship that all AF&PA members must
comply with in order to retain membership.
SFI encourages protecting wildlife habitat
and water quality, reforesting harvested
land, and conserving ecologically sensitive
forest land. SFI recognizes that continuous
public involvement is crucial to its ultimate
goal of "ensuring that future generations of
Americans will have the same abundant
forests that we enjoy today."
The SFI stresses the importance of reach-
ing out to the public through toll-free infor-
mation lines, environmental education, pri-
vate and public sector technical assistance
programs, workshops, videos, and other
means. To help keep the public informed of
achievements in sustainable forestry, mem-
bers report annually on their progress, and
AF&PA distributes the resulting publication
to interested parties. In addition, AF&PA
runs two national forums a year, which
bring together loggers, landowners, and
senior industry representatives to review
progress toward SFI objectives.
Many AF&PA state chapters have devel-
oped additional activities to inform the
public about the SFI. For example, in New
Hampshire, AF&PA published a brochure
about sustainable forestry and used it to
brief local sawmill officials and the media.
A1-9
-------
Building Partnerships—Appendices
Appendix II: Examples of Public Involvement Activities
(cont.)
In Vermont, a 2-hour interactive television
session allowed representatives from indus-
try, public agencies, environmental organi-
zations, the academic community, and pri-
vate citizens to share their views on sus-
tainable forestry. Furthermore, in West
Virginia, AF&PA formed a Woodland
Owner Education Committee to reach out
to nonindustrial private landowners.
For more information about the SFI,
contact AF&PA at 1 800 878-8878, or visit
the web site .
A1-10
-------
CHARACTERIZING WASTE
APPENDICES
-------
-------
Example Extraction Tests (Draft 9/30/97)
TEST METHOD
LEACHING FLUID
LIQUID:SOLID
RATIO
MAXIMUM
PARTICLE SIZE
NUMBER OF
EXTRACTIONS
TIME OF
EXTRACTIONS
COMMENTS
I. Static Tests
A. Agitated Extraction Tests
Toxicity Characteristic
Leaching Procedure
(1311)
Extraction Procedure
Toxicity Test (13 10)
ASTM D3987-85
Shake Extraction
of Solid Waste
with Water
California WET
Ultrasonic Agitation
Method for Acceler-
ating Batch Leaching
Test
0. 1 N acetic acid solution,
pH 2.9, for alkaline wastes
0.1 N sodium acetate buffer
solution, pH 5.0, for non-
alkaline wastes
0.5 N acetic acid
(pH-5.0)
ASTM IV reagent water
0.2 M sodium citrate
(pH-5.0)
Distilled water
20:1
16:1 during
extraction
20:1 final dilution
20:1
10:1
4:1
9.5 mm
9.5 mm
As in environment
(as received)
2.0 mm
Ground
1
1
1
1
1
18 ±2 hours
24 hours
18 hours
48 hours
30 minutes
Co-disposal scenario
may not be appropriate;
no allowance for struc-
tural integrity testing of
monolithic samples
High alkalinity samples
may result in variable
data
Not validated for
organics
Similar to EP, but sodi-
um citrate makes test
more aggressive
New - little performance
data
'Bisson, D.L.; Jackson D.R.; Williams K.R.; and Grube WE.. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 41: 1348-1354.
-------
N»
Example Extraction Tests (continued)
TEST METHOD
Alternative TCLP for
Construction, Demo-
lition and Lead Paint
Abatement Debris2
Extraction Procedure
for Oily Waste
(1330)
Synthetic Precipitation
Leaching Procedure
(1312)
Equilibrium Leach
Test
LEACHING FLUID
TCLP acetic acid solutions
Soxhlet with THF and
toluene EP on remaining
solids
#1 Reagent water to pH
4.2 with nitric and sulfuric
acids (60/40)
#2 Reagent water to pH 5.C
with nitric and sulfuric
acids (60/40)
Distilled water
LIQUlDiSOLID
RATIO
20:1
100g:300mL
20:1
20:1
4:1
MAXIMUM
PARTICLE SIZE
<9.5
9.5 mm
9.5 mm
150mm
NUMBER OF
EXTRACTIONS
1
3
1
1
TIME OF
EXTRACTIONS
8 hours
24 hours (EP)
18±2 hours
7 days
COMMENTS
Uses heat to decrease
extraction time
ZHE option for organics
Determines contami-
nants that have been
insolubilized by
solidification
B. Non-Agitated Extraction Tests
Static Leach Test
Method (material
characteristic centre- 1
Can be site specific, 3
standard leachates: water,
brine, silicate/bicarbonate
VOL/surface
10cm
40mm2
surface area
1
>7 days
Series of optional steps
increasing complexity of
analysis
201crest, R.; A Representative Sampling and Alternative Analytical Toxic Characteristic Leachate Procedure Method for
Construction. Demolition, and Lead Paint Abatement Debris Suspected of Containing Leachable Lead. Appl. Occup.
Environ. Hyg. 11(1), January 1996.
-------
Example Extraction Tests (continued)
TEST METHOD
High Temperature
Static Leach Tests
Method (material
characterization
centre-2)
Sequential Extrac-
tion Tests
Sequential Chemical
Extraction
Standard Leach Test,
Procedure C
(Wisconsin)
Multiple Extraction
Procedure (1320)
Monofill Waste
Extraction
Procedures
LEACHING FLUID
Same as MCC-1 (conducted
at 100" C)
0.04 m acetic acid
5 leaching solutions of
increasing acidity
DI water SYN Landfill
Same as EP TOX, then
with synthetic acid rain
(sulfuric acid, nitric acid
in 60:40% mixture)
Distilled/ deionized water
or other for specific site
LIQUID:SOLID
RATIO
VOL/Surface
10 cm
MAXIMUM
PARTICLE SIZE
40 mm2 Surface Area
NUMBER OF
EXTRACTIONS
1
C. Sequential Chemical Extraction Tests
50:1
9.5 mm
15
D. Concentration Build-Up Test
Varies from 16.1
to 40.1
10:1,5:1
7.5:1
150mm
As in environment
5
3
II Dynamic Tests (Leaching Fluid Renewed)
A. Serial Batch (Particle)
20:1
10:1
per extraction
9.5 mm
9.5 mm
or monolith
9
(or more)
4
TIME OF
EXTRACTIONS
>7 Days
24 hours
per extraction
Varies 3 or 14 days
3 or 14 days
24 hours
per extraction
18 hours
per extraction
COMMENTS
Series of optional steps
increasing complexity of
analysis
Examines partitioning of
metals into different frac-
tions or chemicals forms
Sample discarded after
each leach, new sample
added to existing
leachate
U)
-------
p
3
I
Example Extraction Tests (continued)
TEST METHOD
Graded Serial Batch
(U.S. Army)
Sequential Batch Ext.
Of Waste with Water
ASTM D-4793-93
Use of Chelating
Agent to Determine
the Metal Availability
for Leaching Soils
and Wastes3
IAEA Dynamic Leach
Test (International
Atomic Energy
Agency)
Leaching Tests on
Solidified Products1
LEACHING FLUID
Distilled water
Type IV reagent water
Demineralized water with
EDTA, sample to a final
pH of 7±0.5
DI water/site water
0.1N acetic acid
LIQUID:SOLID
RATIO
Increases from
2:1 to 96:1
20:1
50 or 100
MAXIMUM
PARTICLE SIZE
N/A
As in environment
<300 fim
NUMBER OF
EXTRACTIONS
>7
10
1
B. Flow Around Tests
N/A
20:1
(Procedure A)
2:l(6hrs.)&
10:l(18hrs.)
(Procedure B)
One face prepared
0.6 fim-70 fjm
>19
1
TIME OF
EXTRACTIONS
Until steady
state
18 hours
18, 24,
or 48 hours
>6 months
24 hours
COMMENTS
Experimental test based
on Method 7341
S/S technologies most
' valid when applied to
wastes contaminated by
organic pollutants
f
I
'Garrabrants, A.C. and Koson, D.S.; Use of Chelating Agent to Determine the Metal Availability for Leaching from Soils and Wastes, unpublished.
'Leaching Tests on Solidified Products; Gavasci, R., Lombardi, E, Polettine, A., and Sirini, P.
-------
Example Extraction Tests (continued)
TEST METHOD
DLT
LEACHING FLUID
DI water
LIQUID:SOLID
RATIO
N/A
MAXIMUM
PARTICLE SIZE
Surface washing
NUMBER OF
EXTRACTIONS
18
TIME OF
EXTRACTIONS
196 days
COMMENTS
C. Flow Through Tests
ASTM D4874-95
Column Test
Type IV reagent water
One void volume
1
24 hours
III. Other Tests
MCC-Ss Soxhlet Test
(material characteri-
stic center)
ASTM C1308-95
Accelerated Leach
Test5
Generalized Acid
Neutralization Capa-
city Test
Acid Neutralization
Capacity
D I/site water
Acetic acid
HNOj, solutions of
increasing strength
100:1
20:1
3:1
Out and washed
Able to pass through
an ASTM No. 40 sieve
150mm
1
1
1
0.2 ml/min
48 hours
48 hours
per extraction
Only applicable if diffu-
sion is dominant leach-
ing mechanism
Quantifies the alkalinity
of binder and character-
izes buffering chemistry
O308-95 Accelerated Leach Test for Diffusive Releases from Solidified Waste and a Computer Program to Model Diffusive, Fractional Leaching from Cylindrical Wastes.
'Generalized Acid Neutralization capacity Test; Isenburg, J. and Moore, M.
I
OQ
-------
-------
INTREGRATING POLLUTION PREVENTION,
RECYCLING, AND TREATMENT
APPENDICES
-------
Integrating Pollution Prevention, Recycling, and Treatment—Appendices
Appendix I: Technical Assistance Organizations1
ALABAMA
Alabama Department of Environmental
Management
Special Projects-PZ Unit
P.O. Box 301463
Montgomery, AL 36130-1463
Phone:334213-4300
Fax: 334 213-4399
ALASKA
Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation
555 Cordova Street
Anchorage, AK 99501-2617
Phone: 907 269-7582
Fax: 907 269-7652
ARIZONA
Arizona Department of Environmental
Quality
3033 North Central Avenue
Phoenix, AZ 85012
Phone: 602 207-4607
Fax: 602 207-4236
ARKANSAS
Arkansas Industrial Development
Commission
One State Capitol Mall
Little Rock, AR 72201
Phone: 501 682-7325
Fax: 501 682-7341
CALIFORNIA
California Energy Commission
1519 Ninth Street
Sacramento, CA 95814-5512
Phone: 916 654-4554
Fax: 916 663-7832
California Integrated Waste Management
Board
Waste Prevention and Market Development
Division
8800 Cal Center Drive
Mail Station 20
Sacramento, CA 95826
Phone: 916 255-2320
Fax: 916 255-2573
California Manufacturing Technology Center
13430 Hawthorne Boulevard
Hawthorne, CA 90250
Phone: 310 355-3060
Fax: 310 676-8630
California State Department of Toxic
Substances Control
Office of Pollution Prevention and
Technology Development
P.O. Box 806
Sacramento, CA 95812-0806
Phone: 916 322-1815
Fax:916327-4494
A3-2
'This information was excerpted from the Directory of State and Local Pollution Prevention Programs
which is published by the National Pollution Prevention Roundtable, 2000 P Street, NW, Washington,
DC, 20036 (Phone: 202 466-P2P2) and available online at .
-------
Integrating Pollution Prevention, Recycling, and Treatment—Appendices
Appendix I: Technical Assistance Organizations (cont.)
Pollution Prevention. Center
Institute for Research and Technical
Assistance
2800 Olympic Boulevard, Suite 101
Santa Monica, CA 90404
Phone:310453-0450
Fax: 310 453-2660
University of California - Los Angeles
P2 Center
3250 Public Policy Building
P.O. Box 951656
Los Angeles, CA 90095
Phone: 310 825-2654
Fax: 310 206-3906
COLORADO
Colorado Department of Public Health and
Environment
Pollution Prevention Unit
4300 Cherry Creek Drive South
Denver, CO 80222
Phone: 303 692-3003
Fax: 303 782-4969
Mid-American Manufacturing Technology
Center Colorado Regional Office
Rockwell Hall
Colorado State University
Fort Collins, CO 80523
Phone: 303 224-3744
CONNECnCUT
Connecticut Department of Environmental
Protection
79 Elm Street
Hartford, CT 06106-5122
Phone: 203 424-3297
Fax:203566-4924
Connecticut State Technology Extension
Program
170 Middle Turnpike
Storrs, CT 06269-2041
Phone:203486-2585
Connecticut Technical Assistance Program
(ConnTAP)
50 Columbus Boulevard, Fourth Floor
Hartford, CT 06106
Phone: 203 241-0777
Fax: 203 244-2017
DELAWARE
Delaware Department of Natural Resources
and Environmental Conservation
Pollution Prevention Program
P.O. Box 1401
89 Kings Highway
Dover, DE 19903
Phone: 302 739-3822
Fax: 302 739-6242
Delaware Manufacturing Alliance
Delaware Technology Park
One Innovation Way, Suite 301
Newark, DE 19711
Phone: 302 452-2522
Fax: 302 452-1101
A3-3
-------
Integrating Pollution. Prevention, Recycling, and Treatment—Appendices
Appendix I: Technical Assistance Organizations (cont.)
FLORIDA
Florida Department of Environmental
Resource Management
Pollution Prevention Program
2600 Blair Stone Road
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400
Phone: 904 488-0300
Fax: 904 921-8061
GEORGIA.
Georgia Department of Natural Resources
205 Butler Street, SE., Suite 1066
Atlanta, GA 30334
Phone: 404 657-8828
Fax: 404 657-7379
Georgia Department of Natural Resources
Pollution Prevention Assistance Division
Seven Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive,
Suite 450
Atlanta, GA 30334
Phone:404651-5120
Fax: 404 651-5130
Georgia Manufacturing Extension Alliance
Georgia Institute of Technology
223 O'Keefe Building
Atlanta, GA 30332
Phone: 404 894-8989
Fax:404853-9172
University of Georgia
Dawson Hall, Room 307
Athelns, GA 30602
Phone: 706 542-4887
Fax: 706 524-4890
HAWAII
State of Hawaii Department of Health
Environmental Management Division
919 Ala Moana Boulevard
Honolulu, HI 96814
Phone: 808 586-4373
Fax: 808 586-7509
IDAHO
Idaho Division of Environmental Quality
Prevention and Certification Bureau
1410 North Hilton
Boise, ID 83706
Phone: 208 334-5860
Fax: 208 334-0576
ILLINOIS
Chicago Manufacturing Center
HWRIC- dean Manufacturing Program
Homan Square
3333 West Arthington
Chicago, IL 60624
Phone:312265-2180
Fax: 312 265-8336
Illinois Department of Commerce and
Community Affairs
620 F_ast Adams Street, Third Floor
Springfield, IL 62701
Phone: 217 785-6192
Fax: 217 785-6328
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Pollution Prevention
2200 Churchill Road
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield, IL 62794-9276
Phone: 217 782-8700
Fax: 217 782-9142
A3-4
-------
Integrating Pollution Prevention, Recycling, and Treatment—Appendices
Appendix I: Technical Assistance Organizations (cont.)
Illinois Hazardous Waste Research and
Information Center
One East Hazelwood Drive
Champaign, IL 61820
Phone: 217 333-8940
Fax: 217 333-8944
INDIANA
Department of Environmental
Management
Office of P2 and Technical Assistance
100 North Senate Avenue
P.O. Box 6015
Indianapolis, IN 46206-6015
Phone:317232-8172
Fax: 317 233-5627
Indiana P2 and Safe Materials Institute
1291 Cumberland Avenue, Suite Cl
West Lafayette, IN 47906
Phone:317494-6450
Fax:317494-6422
IOWA
Iowa Department of Natural Resources
Waste Reduction Assistance Program
Wallace State Office Building
Des Moines, IA 50319-0034
Phone: 515 281-8499
Fax: 515 281-8895
Iowa Manufacturing Technology Center
2006 South Ankeny Boulevard
ATC Building, 3E
Ankeny, IA 50021
Phone: 515 965-7040 .
Fax: 515 965-7050
Iowa Waste Reduction Center
University of Northern Iowa
Cedar Falls, IA 50614-0185
Phone: 319 273-2079
Fax: 319 273-2926
KANSAS
Kansas Department of Health and
Environment
Office of Pollution Prevention
Building 283
Forbes Field
Topeka, KS 66620
Phone: 913 296-6603
Fax: 913 296-3266
Kansas State University P2 Institute
133 Ward Hall
Manhattan, KS 66506
Phone: 913 532-6501
Fax: 913 532-6952
Mid-American Manufacturing Technology
Center
10561 Barkley, Suite 602
Overland Park, KS 66208
Phone: 913 649-4333
Fax: 913 649-4498
University of Kansas
Continuing Education Building
Lawrence, KS 66045-2608
Phone: 913 864-3968
Fax: 913 864-5827
A3-5
-------
Integrating PoUutioni Prevention, Recycling, and Treatment—Appendices
Appendix I: Technical Assistance Organizations (cont.)
KENTUCKY
Kentucky Business Environmental
Assistance Program
227 Business and Economic Building
Lexington, KY 40506-0034
Phone:606257-1131
Fax: 606 323-1907
Kentucky P2 Center
University of Louisville
Academic Building, Room 420
Louisville, KY 40292
Phone: 502 852-0965
Fax: 502 852-0964
Kentucky Technology Service
P.O. Box 1125
Lexington, KY 40589
Phone: 606 252-7801
Fax: 606 252-7900
LOUISIANA
Louisiana Department of Environmental
Quality
P.O. Box 82263
Baton Rouge, LA 70884
Phone: 504 765-0739
Fax: 504 765-0742
Louisiana Technical Assistance Program
University of New Orleans
Engineering Building, Room 804
New Orleans, LA 70148
Phone: 504 286-6644
Fax: 504 286-5586
MAINE
Maine Department of Environmental
Protection
State House Station, #17
Augusta, ME 04333
Phone:207287-2811
Fax: 207 287-7826
Maine State Planning Office
Waste Management and Recycling Program
38 State House Station
Augusta, ME 04333
Phone: 207 287-3261
Fax: 207 287-6489
MARYLAND
Maryland Department of the Environment
2500 Broening Highway
Baltimore, MD 21224
Phone:410631-4119
Fax: 410 631-4477
Maryland Manufacturing Modernization
Network
Maryland Department of Economic
Development
Division of Business
217 East Redwood Street
Baltimore, MD 21202
Phone: 410 333-0206
Fax: 410 333-1836
Maryland Technology Extension Service
2104 Potomac Building-092
University of Maryland
College Park, MD 20742
Phone: 301 405-3883
A3-6
-------
Integrating Pollution Prevention, Recycling, and Treatment—Appendices
Appendix I: Technical Assistance Organizations (cont.)
MASSACHUSETTS
Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection
One Winter Street
Boston, MA 02202
Phone: 508 792-7962, Ext. 3775
Fax: 508 792-7621
Massachusetts Executive Office of
Environmental Affairs
Office of Technical Assistance for Toxics
Use Reduction
100 Cambridge Street
Boston, MA 02202
Phone: 617 727-3260
Fax: 617 727-3827
Massachusetts Manufacturing Partnership
Bay State Skills Corporation
101 Summer Street, Fourth Floor
Boston, MA 02110
Phone:617292-5100
Toxics Use Reduction Institute
University of Massachusetts at Lowell
One University Avenue
Lowell, MA 01854-2881
Phone: 508 934-3275
.Fax:508934-3050
MICHIGAN
Industrial Technology Institute
Midwest Manufacturing Technology Center
Energy and Environmental Program
P.O. Box 1485
290 IHubbard Road
Ann Arbor, MI 48106
Phone: 313 769-4234
Fax: 313 769-4021
Michigan Department of Environmental
Quality
Environmental Services Division
Pollution Prevention Section
P.O. Box 30457
Lansing, MI 48909-7957
Phone:517373-2731
Fax:517335-4729
Michigan Technical University
Center for dean Industrial Treatment
1400 Townsend
Houghton, MI 49931
Phone: 906 487-3143
Fax: 906 487-3292
University of Michigan
Dana Building
430 East University
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1115
Phone: 313 936-2637
Fax: 313 936-2195
MINNESOTA
Minnesota Office of Environmental
Assistance
520 Lafayette Road, Second Floor
Saint Paul, MN 55155
Phone: 612 215-0296
Fax: 612 297-8709
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Pollution Prevention Program
520 Lafayette Road
Saint Paul, MN 55155
Phone: 612 296-8643
Fax: 612 297-8676
A3-7
-------
Integrating Pollution Prevention, Recycling, and Treatment—Appendices
Appendix I: Technical Assistance Organizations (cont.)
Minnesota Technology, Inc.
400 Mil Place
111 Third Avenue, South
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Phone: 612 672-3446
Fax: 612 339-5214
Minnesota Technology Inc.
Upper Midwest Manufacturing Technology
Center
111 Third Avenue South, Suite 400
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Phone: 612 654-5201
MISSISSIPPI
Mississippi Department of Environmental
Quality
Waste Reduction and Waste Minimization
Program
P.O. Box 10385
Jackson, MS 39289-0385
Phone: 601 961-5171
Fax: 601 961-5376
MISSOURI
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
Technical Assistance Program
Pollution Prevention Unit
P.O. Box 176
Jefferson City, MO 65102
Phone: 314 526-6627
Fax: 314 526-5808
MONTANA
Montana Pollution Prevention Program
Montana State University Extension Service
109 Taylor Hall
Bozeman, MT 59717
Phone: 406 994-3451
Fax: 406 994-5417
Montana Small Business Assistance
Programs
Air Quality Program
P.O. Box 200501
Helena, MT 59620-0501
Phone: 406 444-2960
Fax: 406 433-1872
State of Montana Water Quality Division
P.O. Box 200901
Helena, MT 59620
Phone: 406 444-7343
Fax: 406 444-1374
NEBRASKA
Nebraska Department of Environmental
Quality
Office of Pollution Prevention
P.O. Box 98922
Lincoln, NE 68509-8922
Phone: 402 471-2266
Fax: 402 471-2909
Nebraska Small Business Development
Center
1313 Farnham Street, Suite 312
Omaha, NE 68182-0248
Phone: 402 595-2381
Fax: 402 595-2385
University of Nebraska
Biological Systems Engineering
253 Chase Hall
Lincoln, NE 68583-0726
Phone: 402 472-8656
Fax: 402 472-6337
A3-8
-------
Integrating Pollution Prevention, Recycling, and Treatment—Appendices
Appendix I: Technical Assistance Organizations (cont.)
NEVADA
Nevada Small Business Development
Center
Business Environmental Program, MS-032
University of Nevada at Reno
Reno, NV 89557-0100
Phone: 702 784-1717
Fax: 702 784-1375
NEW HAMPSHIRE
New Hampshire Department of
Environmental Services
P.O. Box 95
Concord, NH 00302-0095
Phone: 603 271-6398
Fax: 603 271-2867
NEW JERSEY
New Jersey Department of Environmental
Protection
Office of Pollution Prevention, CN423
401 East State Street
Trenton, NJ 08625
Phone: 609 777-0518
Fax: 609 777-1330
New Jersey Technical Assistance Program
for Industrial Pollution Prevention (NJTAP)
New Jersey Institute of Technology
GEES Building University Heights
Newark, NJ 07102-1982
Phone: 201 596-5864
Fax: 201 596-6367
NEW MEXICO
New Mexico Economic Development
1100 Saint Francis Drive
Santa Fe, NM 87503
Phone: 505 827-0563
Fax: 505 271-1317
New Mexico Office of Energy, Minerals,
and Natural Resources
2040 South Pacheco Street
Santa Fe, NM 87505
Phone: 505 827-5993
Fax: 505 438-3855
New Mexico Office of the Secretary
Environment Department
P.O. Box 26110
Santa Fe, NM 87502
Phone: 505 827-0677
Fax: 505 271-2846
New Mexico Industry Network
Corporations
1601 Randolph Road, SE., Suite 210
Albuquerque, NM 87106
Phone: 505 272-7800
Fax: 505 272-7810
NEW YORK
Hudson Valley Manufacturing Outreach
Center
Hudson Valley Technology Development
Center
300 Westgate Business Center, Suite 210
Fishkill, NY 12524
Phone:914896-6934
A3-9
-------
Integrating Pollution Prevention, Recycling, and Treatment—Appendices
Appendix I: Technical Assistance Organizations (cont.)
Manufacturing Outreach Center of New
York - Southern Tier
UniPEG
61 Court Street, Sixth Floor
Binghamton, NY 13901
Phone: 607 774-0022
Fax: 607 774-0026
New York Manufacturing Extension
Partnership
385 Jordan Road
Troy, NY 12180-8347
Phone: 518 283-1010
Fax: 518 283- 1212
New York State Environmental Facilities
Corporation
50 Wolf Road, Room 547
Albany, NY 12205
Phone: 518 457-9135
Fax: 518 485-8494
New York City Manufacturing Outreach
Center
NYITAC
253 Broadway, Room 302
New York, NY 10007
Phone:212240-6920
Fax: 212 240-6879
New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation
Pollution Prevention Unit
50 Wolf Road
Albany, NY 12233-8010
Phone: 518 457-7267
Fax: 518 457-2570
Western New York Tech Development
Center
1576 Sweet Home Road
Amherst, NY 14228
Phone: 716 636-3626
Fax: 716 636-3630
NORTH CAROLINA
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural
Resources
Division of Pollution Prevention and
Environmental Assistance
P.O. Box 29569
Raleigh, NC 27626-9569
Phone: 919 715-6500
Fax: 919 715-6794
University of North Carolina
Small Business Environmental Affairs
Office
305 Kennedy Building
Charlotte, NC
Phone: 704 547-3968
Fax: 704 547-3216
NORTH DAKOTA
North Dakota Department of Health
Environmental Health Section
P.O. Box 5520
Bismarck, ND 58502-5200
Phone: 701 328-5150
Fax: 701 328-5200
University of North Dakota
Energy and Environmental Research Center
P.O. Box 9018
Grand Forks, ND 58202-9018
Phone: 701 777-5000
Fax: 701-777-5181
A3-10
-------
Integrating Pollution Prevention, Recycling, and Treatment—Appendices
Appendix I: Technical Assistance Organizations (cont.)
OHIO
Great Lakes Manufacturing Technology
Center (GLMTC)
Prospect Park Building
4600 Prospect Avenue
Cleveland, OH 44103-4314
Phone:216432-5350
Fax: 216 432-5314
Ohio Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Pollution Prevention
1800 Watermark Drive
P.O. Box 1049
Columbus, OH 43216-1049
Phone: 614 644-2930
Fax: 614 728-2329
Plastics Technology Deployment Center
Prospect Park Building
4600 Prospect Avenue
Cleveland, OH 44103
Phone: 216 432-5340
Fax: 216 361-2088
OKLAHOMA
Oklahoma Alliance for Manufacturing
Excellence, Inc.
252 South Main, Suite 500
Tulsa, OK 74103
Phone: 918 592-0722
Fax: 918 592-1417
Oklahoma Department of Environmental
Quality
Pollution Prevention Program
1000 NE. 10th Street
Oklahoma City, OK 73117-1212
Phone: 405 271-1400
Fax: 405 271-8425
OREGON
Oregon Department of Environmental
Quality
Toxics Use and Hazardous Waste
Reduction Program
811SW Sixth Avenue
Portland, OR 97204
Phone: 503 229-5946
Fax: 503 229-5850
PENNSYLVANIA
Northeast Pennsylvania Manufacturing
Extension Program
Manufacturers Resource Center
125 Goodman Drive
Bethlehem, PA 18015
Phone: 610 758-5599
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental
Resources
Source Reduction Program
P.O. Box 8472
Harrisburg, PA 17105-8472
Phone: 717 787-0540
Fax: 717 787-8926
Pennsylvania Technical Assistance Program
Perm State University
117 Tech Center
University Park, PA 16802
Phone: 814 865-0427
Fax: 814 865-5909
Western Pennsylvania Manufacturing
Extension Program
4516 Henry Street
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
Phone: 412 687-0200, Ext. 234
A3-11
-------
Integrating Pollution Prevention, Recycling, and Treatment—Appendices
Appendix I: Technical Assistance Organizations (cont.)
RHODE ISLAND
Rhode Island Department of
Environmental Management
Office of Strategic Planning and Policy
235 Promenade Street
Providence, RI 02908
Phone: 800 CLEAN RI or 401 222-3434
Fax:401222-2591
Rhode Island Economic Development
Corporation
Seven Jackson Walkway
Providence, RI 02903
Phone: 401 277-2601
Fax: 401 277-2591
SOUTH CAROLINA
South Carolina Department of Health and
Environmental Control
Center for Waste Minimization
2600 Bull Street
Columbia, SC 29201
Phone: 803 734-4761
Fax: 803 734-9934
University of South Carolina Institute of
Public Affairs
Hazardous Waste Management Research
Fund
937 Assembly Street
Columbia, SC 29208
Phone: 803 777-8157
Fax: 803 777-4575
SOUTH DAKOTA
South Dakota Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Joe Foss Building
523 East Capitol Avenue
Pierre, SD 57501-3181
Phone: 605 773-4216
Fax: 605 773-4068
TENNESSEE
Tennessee Center for Industrial Services
226 Capitol Building, Suite 600
Nashville, TN 37219-1804
Phone: 615 974-3018
Fax: 615 974-1528
TEXAS
Dallas County Community College
12800 Abrams Road
Dallas, TX 75243-2199
Phone:214238-6905
Fax: 214 238-6467
Texas Natural Resource Conservation
Commission
Office of Pollution Prevention and
Recycling (MC112)
P.O. Box 13087
Austin, TX 78711-3087
Phone: 512 239-3166
Fax: 512 239-3165
University of Texas at Arlington
Environmental Institute for Technology
Transfer
P.O. Box 19050
Arlington, TX 76019
Phone: 817 273-2300
Fax: 817 794-5653
A3-12
-------
Integrating Pollution Prevention, Recycling, and Treatment—Appendices
Appendix I: Technical Assistance Organizations (cont.)
UTAH
Utah. Department of Environmental Quality
Office of Planning and Public Affairs
168 North 1950 West
P.O. Box 144810
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4810
Phone: 801 536-4477
Fax: 801 536-4401
Weber State University
Automotive Technology
Ogden, Utah 84408-6318
Phone: 801 626-6318
Fax: 801 626-7917
VERMONT
Vermont Department of Environmental
Conservation
Pollution Prevention Division
Environmental Assistance Division
West Office Building
103 South Main Street
Waterbury, VT 05671-0404
Phone: 802 241-3888
Fax: 802 241-3296
VIRGINIA
A.I. Philpott Manufacturing Center
231 East Church Street
Martmsville, VA 24112
Phone: 703 666-8890
Virginia Department of Environmental
Quality
Office of Pollution Prevention
P.O. Box 10009
Richmond, VA 23240-0009
Phone: 804 698-4545
Fax: 804 698-4346
WASHINGTON
Washington State Department of Ecology
Hazardous Waste and Toxics Reduction
Program
P.O. Box 47600
Olympia, WA 98504-7600
Phone: 360 407-6086
Fax: 360 407-6989
WEST VIRGINIA
West Virginia Division of Environmental
Protection
Office of Water Resources
Pollution Prevention Services
2006 Robert C. Byrd Drive
Beckley, WV 25801-8320
Phone: 304 484-6269
Fax: 304 558-2780
WISCONSIN
University of Wisconsin
Extension SHWEC
1304 South 70th Street
WestAllis,WI53214
Phone: 414 475-2845
Fax: 414 475-3777
Wisconsin Department of Natural
Resources
Hazardous Waste Minimization Program
P.O. Box 7921
Madison, WI 53707
Phone: 608 267-3763
Fax: 608 267-2768
A3-13
-------
Integrating Pollution. Prevention, Recycling, and Treatment—Appendices
Appendix I: Technical Assistance Organizations (cont.)
"Wisconsin Department of Natural
Resources
Pollution Prevention Program
P.O. Box 7921, TS/6
101 South Webster
Madison, WI 53707
Phone:608267-3125
Fax: 608 267-0496
WYOMING
Wyoming Department of Environmental
Quality-
Solid and Hazardous Waste Division
122 West 25th Street
Cheyenne, WY 82002
Phone:307777-6105
Fax: 307 777-5973
GUAM
Guam Environmental Protection Agency
P.O. Box 22439
Guam Main Facility
Barrigada, Guam 96921
Phone: 671 472-8863
Fax: 671 477-9402
PUERTO RICO
Puerto Rico Environmental Technology
Assistance
P.O. Box 40285
San Juan, Puerto Rico 00940
Phone: 809 765-7517, Ext. 381
Fax: 809 765-6853
A3-14
-------
Integrating Pollution Prevention, Recycling, and Treatment—Appendices
Appendix II: Trade Associations
GENERAL
American Society for Testing and Materials
100 Barr Harbor Drive
West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959
Phone: 610 832-9500
Fax: 610 832-9555
Home page:
Center for Waste Reduction Technologies
534 East 47th Street, 12th Floor
New York, NY 10017
Phone: 212 705-7407
Fax: 212 838-8274
Home page:
Mid-Continent Recycling Association
P.O. Box 5520
Bismarck, ND 58502-5520
Phone: 701 221-5170
Fax: 701 221-5200
National Recycling Coalition
1727 King Street, Suite 105
Alexandria, VA 22314-2720
Phone: 703 683-9025
Fax: 703 683-9026
Northeast Recycling Council
139 Main Street, Suite 401
Brattleboro, VT 05301
Phone: 802 254-3636
Fax: 802 254-5870
Home page:
Pacific Northwest Economic Region
First Interstate Center, Suite 1080
999 Third Avenue
Seattle, WA 98104
Phone:206464-7298
Fax: 206 464-6859
Home page:
Pacific Northwest Pollution Prevention
Research Center
1326 Fifth Avenue, Suite 650
Seattle, WA 98101
Phone:206223-1151
Fax: 206 223-1165
Home page:
-------
Prevention, Recycling, and Treatment—Appendices
Appendix II: Trade Associations (cont.)
ALUMINUM
Aluminum. Association
900 19th Street, NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20006
Phone: 202 862-5100
Fax: 202 862-5164
Home page:
ASPHALT
Asphalt Recycling and Reclaiming
Association
Three Church Circle, Suite 250
Annapolis, MD 21401
Phone: 410 267-0023
Fax: 410 267-7546
Home page:
CHEMICALS
rfopTmr-gl Manufacturers Association
1300 Wilson Boulevard
Arlington, VA 22209
Phone: 703 741-5000
Fax: 703 741-6242
Home page:
The National Association of Chemical
Recyclers
1200 G Street, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20005
Phone: 202 434-8740
Fax: 202 434-8741
Home page:
Synthetic Organic
Association
Manufacturers
1100 New York Avenue, Suite 1090
Washington, DC 20005
Phone: 202 414-4100
Fax: 202 289-8584
Home page:
COAL ASH
American Coal Ash Association
2760 Eisenhower Avenue, Suite 304
Alexandria, VA 22314-4553
Phone: 703 317-2400
Fax: 703 317-2409
Home page:
FERROUS METALS
Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries
1325 G Street, NW, Suite 1000
Washington, DC 20005-3104
Phone: 202 737-1770
Fax: 202 626-0900
Home page:
American Iron and Steel Institute
1101 17th Street, NW, Suite 1300
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: 202 452-7112
Fax: 202 463-6573
Home page:
American Foundrymen's Society, Inc.
505 State Street
Des Plaines, IL 60016-8399
Phone: 847 824-0181 or 800 537-4237
Fax: 847 824-7848
Home page:
A3-16
-------
Integrating Pollution Prevention, Recycling, and Treatment—Appendices
Appendix II: Trade Associations (cont.)
Container Recycling Institute
1400 16th St., NW, Suite 250
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: 202 797-6839
Fax: 202 797-5411
Home page:
Recycling Institute
680 Andersen Drive
Pittsburgh, PA 15220-2700
Phone: 412 922-2772 or 800 876-7274
Fax: 412 922-3213
Home page:
FOOD AND YARD WASTE
Compost Council
114 South Pitt Street
Alexandria, VA 22314
Phone: 703 739-2401
Fax: 703 739-2407
Home page:
Grocery Manufacturers of America
1010 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, Suite 900
Washington, DC 20007
Phone: 202 337-9400
Fax: 202 337-4508
Home page:
National Composting Program. (US
Conference of Mayors)
1620 I Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006
Phone: 202 293-7330
Fax: 202 429-0422
Home page:
National Food Processors Association
1401 New York Avenue, NW, Suite 400
Washington, DC 20005
Phone: 202 639-5900
Fax: 202 639-5932
Home page:
OIL
American Petroleum Institute
1220 L Street, NW
Washington, DC 20005
Phone: 202 682-8000
Fax: 202 682-8031
Home page:
National Oil Recyclers Association
12429 Cedar Road, Suite 26
Cleveland, Ohio 44106-3172
Phone: 216-791-7316
Fax: 216-791-6047
Home page:
United Association of Used Oil Services
318 Newman Road
Sebring, FL 33870
Phone: 941 655-3880 or 800 877-4356
Fax: 941 655-3713
PACKAGING
Corrugated Packaging Council
2850 Golf Road
Rolling Meadow, IL 60008
Phone: 847 364-9600 or 800 879-9777
Fax: 847 364-9639
Home page:
A3-17
-------
Integrating Pollution. Prevention, Recycling, and Treatment—Appendices
Appendix II: Trade Associations (cont.)
Institute of Packaging Professionals
481 Carlisle Drive
Herndon, VA 22070-4819
Phone: 703 318-8970 or 800 432-4085
Fax: 703 318-0310
Home page:
National Wooden Pallet and Container
Association
1800 North Kent Street, Suite 911
Arlington, VA 22209-2109
Phone: 703 527-7667
Fax: 703 527-7717
Home page:
PAPER
American. Forest and Paper Association
1111 19th Street, NW, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: 202 463-2700 or 800 878-8878
Fax: 202 463-2785
Home page:
Institute of Paper Science and Technology
500 10th Street, NW
Atlanta, GA 30318
Phone: 404 894-5726
Fax: 404 894-4778
Home page:
PLASTICS
American Plastics Council
1801 K Street, NW, Suite 701L
Washington, DC 20006
Phone: 202 974-5400 or 800 243-5790
Fax:202296-7119
Home page:
TEXTILES
American Textile Manufacturers Institute
1 130 Connecticut Avenue NW,
Suite 1200
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: 202 862-0541
Fax: 202 862-0570
Home page:
Council for Textile Recycling
Secondary Materials & Recycled Textiles, Inc.
7910 Woodmont Avenue, Suite 1212
Bethesda, MD 20814
Phone: 301 656-1077
Fax: 301 656-1079
Home page:
Edison Electric Institute
701 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington DC 20004-2696
Phone: 202 508-5000
Fax: 202 508-5186
Home page:
Alabama Waste Materials Exchange
411 East Irvine Avenue
Florence, AL 35630
Phone: 205 764-6830
A3-18
-------
Integrating Pollution Prevention, Recycling, and Treatment—Appendices
Appendix III: North American Materials Exchanges
Alaska Materials Exchange
Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation
555 Cordova Street
Anchorage, AK 99501
Phone: 907 269-7586 or 800 510-2332
Alberta Waste Materials Exchange
Alberta Research Council
P.O. Box 8330
Edmonton, AB T6H 5X2
Canada
Phone: 403 465-3308
Home page:
Arizona Waste Exchange
4725 East Sunrise Drive, Suite 215
Tucson, AZ 85718
Phone: 602 299-7716
Arizona Resource Exchange Program
1331 East Fifth Street
P.O. Box 210049
Tucson, AZ 85721-0049
Phone: 520 621-1266
Arkansas Economic Development
Commission
One Capitol Mall, Room 4B215
Little Rock, AR 72201
Phone: 501 682-7325
Home page:
Atlantic Coastal Action Program
P.O. Box 6878, Station A
Saint John, NB E20 4S3
Canada
Phone: 506 652-2227
Berkshires Materials Exchange
Center for Ecological Technology
112 Elm Street
Pittsfield, MA 01201
Phone: 413 445-4556
Business Materials Exchange
136 West Grand Avenue, Suite 100
Beloit,WI53511
Phone: 608 364-1131 or 800 364-3233
Home page:
California Materials Exchange
California Integrated Waste Management
Board
8800 Cal Center Drive
Sacramento, CA 95826
Phone:916255-2369
Home page:
A3-19
-------
Integrating Pollution Prevention, Recycling, and Treatment—Appendices
Appendix III: North American Materials Exchanges (cont.)
Waste Materials Exchange
ORTECH Corporation
2395 Speakman Drive
Mississauga, ON L5K 1B3
Canada
Phone: 905 822-4111, Ext. 265
Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) Becyclables
Exchange
141 West Jackson Blvd.
Chicago, IL 60604-2994
Phone: 312 435-7223
Home page:
Commercial Materials Exchange
1583 Banks Road
Margate, FL 33063
Phone: 954 984-0701
EnviroShare Materials Exchange
Hall County Resource Recovery
Post Office Drawer 1435
Gainesville, GA 30503
Phone: 770 535-8284
Home page:
Hawaii Materials Exchange
P.O. Box 121
Wailuku, HI 96793
Phone: 808 667-7744 or 888 991-4000
Home page: <33iauLnet/~mrghimex/
himexl.html>
Hudson Valley Materials Exchange
207 Milton Turnpike
Milton, NY 12547
Phone: 914 795-5507
Illinois Industrial Materials Exchange
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (34)
2200 Churchill Road
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield, IL 62794-9276
Phone:217782-0450
Home page:
Indiana Materials Exchange
P.O. Box 2931
125 West South Street
Indianapolis, IN 46206-2931
Phone: 614 397-7675 or 800 968-8764
, Home page:
Tn<|tgng Waste Exchange
c/o Recyder's Trade Network, Lac.
P.O. Box 454
Camel, IN 46032
Phone:317574-6505
Industrial Materials Exchange
First Interstate Center
999 Third Avenue, Suite 700
Seattle, WA 98104-4039
Phone: 206 296-4899/3968
Home page:
Industrial Materials Exchange, Inc.
1001 SW Second Avenue, Suite 234
Boca Raton, FL 33487
Phone: 800 541-7156
Industrial Materials Exchange Service
P.O. Box 19276, #34
Springfield, IL 62794-9276
Phone: 217 782-0450
A3-20
-------
Integrating Pollution Prevention, Recycling, and Treatment—Appendices
Appendix III: North American Materials Exchanges (cont.)
Industrial Waste Recycling and Prevention
Program
Long Island City Business Development Corps
29-10 Thomson Avenue, Ninth Floor
Long Island City, NY 11101
Phone: 718 786-5300, Ext. 24
Iowa Waste Reduction Center
By-Product and Waste Search Service
University of Northern Iowa
75BRC
Cedar Falls, IA 50614-0185
Phone: 319 273-2079 or 800 422-3109
Home page:
Intercontinental Waste Exchange
5200 Town Center Circle, Suite 303
Boca Raton, FL 33486
Phone: 800 541-0400
Kansas Materials Exchange
P.O. Box 152
Hutchinson, KS 67504-0152
Phone: 316 662-0551
Kentucky Department of Environmental
Protection, Division of Waste Management
18 Riley Road
Frankfort, KY 40601
Phone: 502 564-6716
Kentucky Industrial Materials Exchange
Kentucky Pollution Prevention Center
420 Academic Building
University of Louisville
Louisville, KY 40292
Phone: 502 852-0965 or 800 334-8635,
Ext. 0965
Home page:
La Bourse Quebecoise des Matieres
Secondaires
900 Place D'Youville
Bureau 210
Quebec, PQ G1R 3P7
Canada
Phone: 418 528-0908 or 800 668-6686
Homepage:
Maine Materials Exchange
93 Maquoit Drive
Freeport, ME 04032
Phone: 207 865-6621
Manitoba Waste Exchange
Resource Conservation Manitoba
2-70 Alberta Street
Winnipeg, MB R3B 1E7
Canada
Phone: 204 942-4207
Home page:
Material Exchange
1037 State Street
Bridgeport, CT 06605
Phone: 203 335-3452
A3-21
-------
Integrating Pollution. Prevention, Recycling, and Treatment—Appendices
Appendix III: North American Materials Exchanges (cont.)
Minnesota Materials Exchange
Minnesota Office of Environmental
Assistance
520 Lafayette Road, Second Floor
St. Paul, MN 55155-4100
Phone: 612 215-0216
Minnesota Materials Exchange Alliance
Minnesota Technical Assistance Program
1313 Fifth Street, Suite 307
Minneapolis, MN 55414
Phone: 612 627-4646 or 800 247-0015
Home page:
Missouri Environmental Improvement
Authority
325 Jefferson Street
Jefierson City, MO 65101
Phone: 314 751-4919
Mississippi Technical Assistance Program
P.O. Box 9595
Mississippi State, MS 39762
Phone: 601 325-8454
Home page:
Montana Industrial Waste Exchange
Montana Chamber of Commerce
P.O. Box 1730
Helena, MT 59624
Phone: 406 442-2405
Montana Materials Exchange
MS Extension Service
Taylor Hall
Bozeman, MT 59717
Phone: 406 994-3451 or 888 678-6872
Home page:
National Association for the Exchange of
Industrial Resources
560 McClure Street
Galesburg, IL61401
Phone: 800 562-0955
Home page:
New Hampshire Materials Exchange
122 North Main Street
Concord, NH 03301
Phone: 603 224-5388 or 800 895-1930
Home page:
New Jersey Industrial Waste Information
Exchange
50 West State Street, Suite 1110
Trenton, NJ 08608
Phone: 609 989-7888
New Mexico Material Exchange
Four Corners Recycling
P.O. Box 904
Farmington, NM 87499
Northeast Industrial Waste Exchange, Inc.
P.O. Box 2171
Annapolis, MD 21404
Phone: 410 280-2080
Northeast Minnesota Waste Exchange
Western Lake Superior Sanitary District
2626 Courtland Street
Duluth, MN 55806
Phone: 218 722-3336
A3-22
-------
Integrating Pollution Prevention, Recycling, and Treatment—Appendices
Appendix III: North American Materials Exchanges (cont.)
Ohio's Materials Exchange (OMEx)
c/o Waste Alternatives
P.O. Box 70
Mount Vernon, OH 43050
Phone: 888 718-6639
Home page:
Oklahoma Waste Exchange Program
Department of Environmental Quality
Waste Management Division
1000 NE. 10th Street
Oklahoma City, OK 73117-1212
Phone: 405 271-7354
. Home page:
Olmsted County Material Exchange
Olxnsted County Public Works
2122 Campus Drive
Rochester, MN 55904
Phone:507285-8231
Ontario Waste Exchange
ORTECH Corporation
2395 Speakman Drive
Mississauga, ON L5K 1B3
Canada
Phone: 905 822-4111, Ext. 358
Pacific Materials Exchange
1522 North Washington, Suite 202
Spokane, WA 99205
Phone: 509 325-0551
Puerto Rico Waste Exchange
West 339 Calderon Street
San Juan, PR 00926
Phone: 809 748-0433
Resource Exchange Network for
Eliminating ^Vaste
TNRCC (MC-112)
P.O. Box 13087
Austin, TX 78711-3087
Phone: 512 463-7773
Home page:
Rocky Mountain Materials Exchange
999 18th Street, Suite 2750
Denver, CO 80202
Phone: 303 297-0180, Ext. 103
Home page:
Southeast Minnesota Materials Exchange
171 West Third Street
Winona, MN 55987
Phone: 507 457-6464
Home page:
Southeast Waste Exchange
Urban Institute
University of North Carolina, Charlotte
9201 University City Boulevard
Charlotte, NC 28223-0001
Phone: 704 547-4289
Southern Waste Information Exchange
P.O. Box 960
Tallahassee, FL 32302
Phone: 904 386-6280 or
800 441-SWIX (441-7949)
Home page:
A3-23
-------
Integrating Pollution Prevention, Recycling, and Treatment—Appendices
— Appendix III: North American Materials Exchanges (cont.)
A3-24
Southwest Minnesota Materials Exchange
Nobels County/Environmental Services
P.O. Box 757
Worthington, MN 56187
Phone: 507 372-8227
Tennessee Materials Exchange
226 Capitol Boulevard Building,
Suite 605
Nashville, TN 37219
Phone: 615 532-8881
Home page:
Transcontinental Materials Exchange
Department of Civil Engineering
Louisiana State University
Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Phone: 504'388-4594
TSDX Corporation
1667 Cole Boulevard, Suite 400
Golden, CO 80401
Phone: 303 202-6620
Home page:
Vermont Business Materials Exchange
P.O. Box 935
Brattleboro, VT 05302
Phone: 802 257-7505
Wastelmk, Division of Tencon, Lac.
140 Wooster Pike
Milford, OH45150
Phone: 513 248-0012
Wisconsin Department of Natural
Resources Bureau of Solid and Hazardous
Waste Management
101 South Webster Street
P.O. Box 7921
Madison, WI 53707-7921
Phone: 608 267-9523
-------
Integrating Pollution Prevention, Recycling, and Treatment—Appendices
Appendix IV: Publications, Online Resources, and Software
PUBLICATIONS AND ONLINE RESOURCES
The following are print and electronic sources of information about pollution prevention and waste
reduction.
American Forest and Paper Association (AF&PA). AF&PA is the national trade association of the forest,
paper, and wood products industries. It offers documents that may help you find buyers for wood and
paper wastes. These documents include:
• National Wood Recycling Directory. This directory provides a nationwide listing of over 650
wood residue receiving centers. You can also search an on-line database of wood residue
receiving centers at .
• PaperMatcher: A Directory of Paper Recycling Mills. This directory provides contact
information for waste paper dealers, recycling centers, and mills consuming waste paper.
Contact AF&PA at 800 878-8878 (e-mail at: INFO@afandpa.ccmail.compuserve.com). A publications
order form is available online at .
California Integrated Waste Management Board. This web site contains general waste prevention back-
ground and business waste reduction program overviews, fact sheets, and information about market
development for recycled materiab and waste reduction training.
Home page: .
Center for Environmental Research Information (CEK0- CERI technical documents on waste reduction
include guides and manuals, summaries of pollution prevention opportunity assessments, and waste
reduction alternatives for specific industry sectors. Examples of resources available from CERI include:
• Facility Pollution Prevention Guide. U.S. EPA, EPA600-R-92-088.
• Primer/Financial Analysis/Pi Projects. U.S. EPA, EPA600-R-93-059.
Industry-specific guides are available for many industries, including:
• Fabricated metals;
• Pharmaceuticals;
• Metal finishing; and
• Painted circuit boards.
Contact CERI at 513-569-7562 (e-mail at: ord.ceri@epamail.epa.gov) to request publications.
Home page: .
Enviro$en$e. Enviro$en$e is a federal P2 network created by integrating technical information from
EPA, over 16 Federal agencies, the States through the National Pollution Prevention Roundtable, and
industry. The system seeks to facilitate the sharing of technology and experience among manufacturers,
government, and researchers. It includes a directory of federal, state, and local pollution prevention pro-
grams. Enviro$en$e enables users to exchange information with other environmental professionals,
access online databases such as EPA's Solvent Alternatives Umbrella and Pollution Prevention Case
Studies, obtain EPA publications, and conduct key-word searches.
A3-25
-------
Integrating Pollution Prevention, Recycling, and Treatment—Appendices
Appendix IV: Publications, Online Resources, and Software
(cont.)
Industry-specific information is included for the following industries:
• Commercial printing and graphic arts;
• Electronics assembly and manufacturing;
• Iron and steel foundries; and
• Metal finishing.
EnviroSenSe is accessible through either a modem at 703 908-2092 or the Internet at .
National Pollution. Prevention Roundtable. The National Pollution Prevention Roundtable (NPPR) is the
largest membership organization in the United States devoted solely to pollution prevention. The mis-
sion of the Roundtable is to provide a national forum for promoting the development, implementation,
and evaluation of efforts to avoid, eliminate, or reduce pollution at the source. NPPR publishes The
Pollution Prevention Yellow Pages, a listing of regional P2 organizations that work with state and local
governments, state and local government programs, federal agencies and EPA P2 coordinators, and non-
profit groups, private sector organizations, and non-profit consultants who work on P2. The
Roundtable's web site provides an abridged online version of The Pollution Prevention Yellow Pages
information and links to state P2 programs, P2 resources, and a publications list. Home page:
.
Pacific Northwest Pollution. Prevention Research Center. This Internet site offers a comprehensive data-
base of pollution prevention research projects. Currently, the site includes fact sheets on more that 300
research projects. In addition, the site also includes analyses of successful pollution prevention
approaches, which have been documented through demonstration projects. The site can help waste
generators identify professionals with experience in areas of concern.
Home page: .
Pollution Prevention Information Clearinghouse (PPIC). PPIC maintains a collection of documents relat-
ed to waste reduction. The clearinghouse serves as a distribution center for nonregulatory EPA docu-
ments. Some of the resources available include:
• Pollution Prevention Directory. U.S. EPA, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics,
EPA742-B-94-005, September 1994.
• Pollution Prevention Information Clearinghouse Information Sheet. February 1994.
• EnviroSenSe (brochure). U.S. EPA, February 1996.
• Setting up a Pollution Prevention Program. EPA742-F-93-004, September 1993.
• ISO 14000: International Environmental Management Standards (EPA Standards Network
A3-26
-------
Integrating Pollution Prevention, Recycling, and Treatment—Appendices
Appendix IV: Publications, Online Resources, and Software
(cont.)
Fact Sheet). U.S. EPA, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, EPA742-F-95-006, May 1995.
Contact PPIC at 202 260-1023 (e-mail: ppic@epamail.epa.gov) for a general information packet and a
current list of materials available.
Technical Assistance Resources for Pollution Prevention (TARP2). This web site provides an extensive
listing and links to Internet resources on pollution prevention topics. It includes descriptions of elec-
tronic resources for the federal government, state and local governments, research and information cen-
ters, international organizations, and business and industry links.
Home page: .
US Department of Energy (DOE) Industrial Assessment Centers (lACs). DOE's Office of Industrial
Technologies sponsors free industrial assessments for small and medium-sized manufacturers. Teams of
engineering students from the centers, located at 30 universities around the country, conduct energy
audits or industrial assessments and provide recommendations to manufacturers to help them identify
opportunities to improve productivity, reduce waste, and save energy. Recommendations from industrial
assessments have averaged about $55,000 in potential annual savings for each manufacturer. The IAC
web site can help you locate the nearest IAC and learn more about the program.
Home page: .
Western Region Pollution Prevention Network (P2 West). This is a network of on-line tools and off-line
organizations in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, Guam, and American Samoa). It
lists pollution prevention assistance providers, vendors, consultants, partnering opportunities, useful
documents, background information, ISO 14000 and environmental management information, and links
to other sites.
Home page: .
Software
Governments and other organizations have developed software to help you assess your waste reduction
options and implement solutions.
EPA software. Various EPA offices offer environmental software. For example, EPA Region 5 and Purdue
University have developed the Software for Environmental Awareness (SEA) group of free programs,
including PREVENT, a pollution prevention application. PREVENT provides an overview of P2 concepts
and relevant environmental legislation and describes in detail P2 opportunities in the industry, agricul-
ture, energy, government, and consumer sectors. It also features case studies and offers P2 information
resources.
Home page: .
Waste Reduction Advisory System (WRAS). Developed by the Hazardous Waste Research and
Information Center (HWRIC), WRAS is an electronic waste management tool designed to assist waste
generators reduce and recycle industrial waste. The tool includes a waste reduction checklist and a bib-
liography. The software costs $95. To order, contact HWRIC at 217 333-8940.
A3-27
-------
-------
CONSIDERING THE SITE
APPENDICES
-------
Table of Contents
Appendix I: State Geological Surveys A4-1
Appendix II: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District Contact Information A4-8
Appendix III: State Wellhead Protection Contact Information A4-14
Appendix IV: State Buffer Zone Considerations A4-21
Table 1: State Buffer Zone Restrictions For Surface Impoundments A4-21
Table 2: State Buffer Zone Restrictions For Landfills A4-22
Table 3: State Buffer Zone Restrictions For Waste Piles A4-22
Table 4: State Buffer Zone Restrictions For Land Application A4-23
Table 5: Common Buffer Zone Restrictions Across All Four Unit Types A4-24
-------
Considering the Site—Appendices
Appendix I: State Geological Surveys
For any changes to this information that may
have occurred after publication of this docu-
ment, consult the list kept by the University of
Missouri-Rolla, on which this appendix is
based, at httpyAvww.tuiir.edu/~libraiy/geol/
geoloEhtmL
ALABAMA
Geological Survey of Alabama
P.O. Box O
420 Hackbeny Lane
Tuscaloosa, AL 35486-9780
Phone: 205 349-2852
Fax: 205 349-2861
E-mail: gsa@ogb.gsa.tuscaloosa.al.us
Internet: http://www.gsa.ttiscaloosa.d.us
ALASKA
Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical
Surveys
Suite 200
794 University Avenue
Fairbanks, AK 99709-3645
Phone: 907 451-5010
Fax:907451-5050
ARIZONA
Arizona Geological Survey
Suite 100
416 W Congress St.
Tuscon, AZ 85701
Phone: 520 770-3500
Fax: 520 770-3505
ARKANSAS
Arkansas Geological Commission
Vardelle Parham Geology Center
3815 West Roosevelt Rd.
Little Rock, AR 72204
Phone: 501 296-1877
Fax: 501 663-7360
CALIFORNIA
California Division of Mines and Geology
Department of Conservation
801 K Street, MS 12-30
Sacramento, CA 95814-3531
Phone: 916 445-1923
Fax: 916 445-5718
COLORADO
Colorado Geological Survey
Department of Natural Resources
1313 Sherman Street
Room 715
Denver, CO 80203
Phone:303866-2611
Fax: 303 866-2461
CONNECTICUT
Connecticut Geological & Natural History
Survey
79 Elm St., Store Level
Hartford, CT 06106-5127
Phone: 860 424-3540
Fax: 860 424-4058
A4-1
-------
Considering the Site—Appendices
Appendix I: State Geological Surveys (cont.)
DELAWARE
Delaware Geological Survey
DGS Building
University of Delaware
Newark, DE 19716-7501
Phone: 302 831-2833
Fax: 302 831-3579
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Geologist of Washington, D.C.
Department of Biology and Environmental
Science
MB 44-04
University of the District of Columbia
4200 Connecticut Avenue, N.W
Washington, D.C. 20008-1154
Phone: 202 274-5886
Fax: 202 274-5589
FLORIDA
Florida Geological Survey
903 W Tennessee St.
Tallahassee, FL 32304-7700
Phone: 904 488-4191
Fax: 904 488-8086
GEORGIA
Georgia Geological Survey
Department of Natural Resources
Room 400
19 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive, SW.
Atlanta, GA 30334
Phone: 404 656-3214
Fax: 404 657-8379
HAWAH
Hawaii Department of Land & Natural
Resources
Division of Water and Land Development
Box 373
Honolulu, HI 96809
Phone: 808 587-0230
Fax: 808 587-0283
IDAHO
Idaho Geological Survey
Morrill Hall, Room 332
University of Idaho
Moscow, ID 83843
Phone: 208 885-7991
Fax: 208 885-5826
e-mail: bennett@aspen.csrv.uidaho.edu
ILLINOIS
Illinois State Geological Survey
Natural Resources Building
615 E. Peabody Drive
Champaign, IL 61820-6964
Phone: 217 333-4747
Fax: 217 244-7004
e-mail: isgs@geoserv.isgs.uiuc.edu
Internet: http:7Avww.isgs.uiuc.edu
/isgshome.html
INDIANA
Indiana Geological Survey
611 N. Walnut Grove
Bloomington, IN 47405
Phone: 812 855-9350
Fax: 812 855-2862
Internet: httpyAvww.indiana.edu/
~igs/index,html
A4-2
-------
Considering the Site—Appendices
Appendix I: State Geological Surveys (cont.)
IOWA
Iowa Department of Natural Resources
Geological Survey Bureau
109 Trowbridge Hall
Iowa City, IA 52242-1319
Phone: 319 335-1575
Fax: 319 335-2754
e-mail: dkoch@gsbth-po.igsb.uiowa.edu
Internet: http://www.igsb.mowa.edu
KANSAS
Kansas Geological Survey
1930 Constant Avenue
West Campus
University of Kansas
Lawrence, KS 66047
Phone: 913 864-3965
Fax: 913 864-5317
Internet: http://www.kgs.ukans.edu
KENTUCKY
Kentucky Geological Survey
228 Mining & Mineral Resources Building
University of Kentucky
Lexington, KY 40506-0107
Phone: 606 257-5500
Fax: 606 257-1147
LOUISIANA
Louisiana Geological Survey
BoxG
Louisiana State University
Baton Rouge, LA 70893
Phone: 504 388-5320
Fax: 504 388-5328
MAINE
Maine Geological Survey
Department of Conservation
22 State House Station
Augusta, ME 04333-0022
Phone: 207 287-2801
Fax: 207 287-2353
MARYLAND
Maryland Geological Survey
Maryland Department of Natural Resources
2300 St. Paul Street
Baltimore, MD 21218-5210
Phone: 410 554-5503
Fax: 410 554-5502'
e-mail: ecleaves@mgs.dnr.md.gov
Internet: http://mgs.dnr.md.gov
MASSACHUSETTS
Massachusetts Office of Environmental
Affairs
100 Cambridge Street, 20th Floor
Boston, MA 02202
Phone: 617 727-5830, ext. 305
Fax: 617 727-2754
MICHIGAN
Michigan Geological Survey Division
State Geologist
PO. Box 30256
Lansing, MI 48909-7756
Phone: 517 334-6923
Fax:517334-6038
A4-3
-------
Considering the Site—Appendices
Appendix I: State Geological Surveys (cont.)
MINNESOTA
Minnesota Geological Survey
University of Minnesota
2642 University Avenue
St. Paul, MN 55114-1057
Phone: 612 627-4780
Fax: 612 627-4778
e-mail: mgs@gold.tc.umn.edu
Internet: http://www.geo.umiLedu:80/mgs/
MISSISSIPPI
Mississippi Office of Geology
P.O. Box 20307
Jackson, MS 39289-1307
Phone: 601 961-5500
Fax: 601 961-5521
MISSOURI
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
Division of Geology & Land Survey
111 Fairgrounds Road
Rolla, MO 65402
Phone: 314 368-2100
Fax:314368-2111
MONTANA
Montana Bureau of Mines & Geology
Montana Tech of the University of Montana
1300 W. Park Street
Butte, MT 59701-8997
Phone: 406 496-4180
Fax: 406 496-4451
NEBRASKA
Nebraska Conservation & Survey Division
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
113 Nebraska Hall
Lincoln, NE 68588-0517
Phone: 402 472-3471
Fax: 402 472-2410
e-mail: pwigley@unlinfo.unl.edu
NEVADA
Nevada Bureau of Mines & Geology
University of Nevada, Stop 178
Reno, NV 89557
Phone: 702 784-6691
Fax: 702 784-1709
NEW HAMPSHIRE
New Hampshire Geological Survey
Department of Environmental Sciences
Box 2008
Concord, NH 03302-2008
Phone: 603 271-3406
Fax: 603 271-7894
NEW JERSEY
New Jersey Geological Survey
29 Arctic Parkway, CN-427
Trenton, NJ 08625-0427
Phone: 609 292-1185
Fax: 609 633-1004
Internet: http://www.state.nj.us/dep/njgs/
index-html
A4-4
-------
Considering the Site—Appendices
Appendix I: State Geological Surveys (cont.)
NEW MEXICO
New Mexico Bureau of Mines & Mineral
Resources
Campus Station
Socorro, NM 87801
Phone: 505 835-5420
Fax: 505 835-6333
e-mail: bureau@gis.nmt.edu
Internet: http://geoinfo.nint.edti
NEW YORK
New York State Geological Survey
New York State Museum
3140 Cultural Education Center
Empire State Plaza
Albany, NY 12230
Phone: 518 474-5816
Fax: 518 473-8496
e-mail: rfakundi@museum.nysed.gov
NORTH CAROLINA
North Carolina Geological Survey
Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
Phone: 919 733-3833
Fax: 919 733-4407
NORTH DAKOTA
North Dakota Geological Survey
600 East Boulevard
Bismark, ND 58505-0840
Phone: 701 328-9700
Fax: 701 328-9898
OHIO
Ohio Division of Geological Survey
Department of Natural Resources
4383 Fountain Square Drive
Columbus, OH 43224-1362
Phone: 614 265-6576
Fax:614447-1918
OKLAHOMA
Oklahoma Geological Survey
Energy Center, Room N-131
100 E. Boyd
Norman, OK 73019-0628
Phone: 405 325-3031
Fax: 405 325-7069
e-mail: cjmankin@uoknor.edu
Internet: http://www.uoknor.exlu/special/
ogs-pttc
OREGON
Oregon Department of Geology & Mineral
Industries
Suite 965
800 N.E. Oregon Street #28
Portland, OR 97232-2162
Phone: 503 731-4100
Fax: 503 731-4066
Internet: http://sarvis.doganri.state.or:us
PENNSYLVANIA
Pennsylvania Bureau of Topographic &
Geologic Survey
EO. Box 8453
Harrisburg, PA 17105-8453
Phone: 717 787-2169
Fax: 717 783-7267
A4-5
-------
Considering the Site—Appendices
Appendix I: State Geological Surveys (cont.)
PUERTO RICO
Puerto Rico Geological Survey Division
Department of Natural & Environmental
Resources
Box 5887
Puerta de Tierra Station
San Juan, PR 00906
Phone: 809 722-2526
Fax: 809 724-0365
RHODE ISLAND
Rhode Island State Geologist
Department of Geology
University of Rhode Island
Kingston, RI 02881
Phone: 401 874-2265
Fax: 401 874-2190
e-mail: JACAIN@uriacc.uri.edu
Internet: http:^vww.tui.edu/artsci/ge]/
rigeolsLhtm
SOUTH CAROLINA
South Carolina Geological Survey
5 Geology Road
Columbia, SC 29210-4089
Phone: 803 896-7708
Fax: 803 896-7695
SOUTH DAKOTA
South Dakota Geological Survey
University of South Dakota
414 East Clark Street
Vermillion, SD 57069-2390
Phone: 605 677-5227
Fax: 605 677-5895
TENNESSEE
Tennessee Division of Geology
L&C Tower, 13th Floor
401 Church Street
Nashville, TN 37243
Phone: 615 532-1500
TEXAS
Texas Bureau of Economic Geology
The University of Texas
Box X, University Station
Austin, TX 78713-8924
Phone: 512 471-1534
Fax:512471-0140
e-mail: tyler@begv.utexas.edu
Internet: http://www.utexas.edu/depts/beg/
UTAH
Utah Geological Survey
Box 146100
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-6100
Phone: 801 537-3300
Fax: 801 537-3400
e-mail: lallison@email.state.ut.us
Internet: http://utstdpwww.state.ut.us/~ugs
VERMONT
Vermont Geological Survey
Vermont Agency of Natural Resources
Center Building
103 S. Main Street
Waterbury, VT 05671-0301
Phone: 802 241-3499
Fax:802244-1102
e-mail: larryb@anrimsgis.anr.state.vt.us
A4-6
-------
Considering the Site—Appendices
Appendix I: State Geological Surveys (cont.)
VIRGINIA
Virginia Division of Mineral Resources
Box 3667
Charlottesville, VA 22903
Phone: 804 963-2308
Fax: 804 293-2239
WASHINGTON
Washington Department of Natural
Resources
Division of Geology
-------
Considering the Site—Appendices
Appendix II: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District Contact
Information
North
Atlantic
Division
Great Lakes and
OWoNSiver Division
Pacific Ocean Division
HQ, DIRECTORATE OF CIVIL WORKS
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Department of the Army
108 Army Pentagon
Washington, DC 20310-0108
Phone: 703 695-1370
LOWER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY DIVISION
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Lower MS Valley Division (CELMV-CO-R)
P.O. Box 80
Vicksburg, MS 39180-0080
Phone: 601 634-5821
Memphis District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Memphis District (CELMM-CO-R)
B-202 Clifford Davis Federal Building
Memphis, TN 38103-1894
Phone: 901 544-3471
South
Atlantic
Division
"B
Mississippi
Valley Division
- Division Headquarters
- Regional Headquarters
New Orleans District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
New Orleans District (CELMN-OD-R)
P.O. Box 60267
New Orleans, LA 70160-0267
Phone: 504 862-2255
St. Louis District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
St. Louis District (CELMS-OD-R)
1222 Spruce Street
St. Louis, MO 63103-2833
Phone: 314 331-8575
Vicksburg District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Vicksburg District (CELMK-OD-F)
2101 North Frontage Road
Vicksburg, MS 39180-5191
Phone: 601 631-5376
A4-8
-------
Considering the Site—Appendices
Appendix II: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District Contact
Information (cont.)
MISSOURI RIVER DIVISION
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Missouri River Division (CEMKD-CO-O)
12565 West Center Road
Omaha, NE 68144
Phone: 402 697-2533
Kansas City District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Kansas City District (CEMRK-OD-R)
700 Federal Building
Kansas City, MO 64106-2896
Phone: 816 426-3645
Omaha District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Omaha District (CEMRO-OP-N)
215 North 17th Street
Omaha, NE 68102-4978
Phone: 402 221-4133
NEW ENGLAND DIVISION
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
New England Division (CNED-OD-P)
424 Trapelo Road
Waltham, MA 02254-9149
Phone: 617 647-8057
NORTH ATLANTIC DIVISION
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
North Atlantic Division (CENAD-CO-OP)
90 Church Street
New York, NY 10007-9998
Phone: 212 264-7535
Baltimore District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Baltimore District (CENAB-OP-PN)
P.O. Box 1715
Baltimore, MD 31203-1715
Phone: 410 962-3670
New York District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
New York District (CENAN-PL-E)
26 Federal Plaza
New York, NY 10278-0090
Phone: 212 264-3996
Norfolk District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Norfolk District (CENAO-OP-N)
803 Front Street
Phone: 804 441-7068
Philadelphia District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Philadelphia District (CENAP-OP-N)
Wanamaker Building
100 Penn Square East
Philadelphia, PA 19107-3390
Phone: 215 656-6725
NORTH CENTRAL DIVISION
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
North Central Division (CENCD-CO-MO)
111 North Canal Street, 12th Floor
Chicago, IL 60606-7206
Phone: 312 353-7762
A4-9
-------
Considering the Site—Appendices
Appendix II: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District Contact
Information (cont.)
Buffalo District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Buffalo District (CENCM-CO-R)
1776 Niagara Street
Buffalo, NY 14207-3199
Phone: 716 879-4313
Chicago District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Chicago District (CENCC-CO)
111 North Canal Street, Sixth Floor
Chicago, IL 60606-7206
Phone: 312 886-3555
Detroit District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Detroit District (CENCE-CO-OR)
P.O. Box 1027
Detroit, MI 48231-1027
Phone: 313 226-2432
Rock Island District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Rock Island District (CENCR-OD-R)
P.O. Box 2004
Clock Tower Building
Rock Island, IL 61204-2004
Phone: 309 794-5370
St. Paul District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
St. Paul District (CENCS-SO-PO)
1421 USPO & Custom House
190 Fifth Street East
St. Paul, MN 55101-1638
Phone: 612 290-5376
NORTH PACIFIC DIVISION
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
North Pacific Division (CENPD-CO-R)
P.O. Box 2870
Portland, OR 97208-2870
Phone: 503 326-3780
Alaska District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Alaska District (CENPA-CO-NF)
P.O. Box 898
Anchorage, AK 99506-0898
Phone: 907 753-2712
Portland District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Portland District (CENPP-OP-PN)
P.O. Box 2946
Portland, OR 97208-2946
Phone: 503 326-7146
Seattle District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Seattle District (CENPS-OP-PO)
P.O. Box 3755
Seattle, WA 98124-2255
Phone: 206 764-6695
Walk Walk District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Walla Walla District (CENPW-OP-RM)
City-County Airport
Walla Walla, WA 99362-9265
Phone: 509 522-6720
A4-10
-------
Considering the Site—Appendices
Appendix II: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District Contact
Information (cont.)
OHIO RIVER DIVISION
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Ohio River Division (CEORD-DO-OR)
RO. Box 1159
Cincinnati, OH 45201-1159
Phone: 513 529-5487
Huntington District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Huntington District (CEORH-OR-F)
502 Eighth Street
Huntington, WV 25701-2070
Phone: 304 529-5487
Louisville District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Louisville District (CEORH-OR-F)
EO. Box 59
Louisville, KY 40201-0059
Phone: 502 582-6461
Nashville District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Nashville District (CEORN-OR-R)
P.O. Box 1070
Nashville, TN 37202-1070
Phone: 615 736-5181
Pittsburgh District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Pittsburgh District (CEORP-OR-R)
1000 Liberty Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15222-4186
Phone: 412 644-6872
PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Pacific Ocean Division (CEPOD-CO-O)
Building 230
Fort Shafter, HI 96858-5440
Phone: 808 438-9258
SOUTH ATLANTIC DIVISION
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division (CESAD-CO-R)
77 Forsythe Street, SW, Room 313
Atlanta, GA 30335-6801
Phone: 404 331-2778
Charleston District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Charleston District (CESAC-CO-M)
P.O. Box 919
Charleston, SC 29402-0919
Phone: 803 727-4604
Jacksonville District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Jacksonville District (CESAJ-CO-OR)
P.O. Box 4970
400 West Bay Street
Jacksonville, FL 32232-0019
Phone: 904 232-2907
Mobile District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Mobile District (CESAM-OP-R)
109 St. Joseph Street
P.O. Box 2288
Mobile, AL 38628-0001
Phone: 205 690-2658
A4-11
-------
Considering the Site—Appendices
Appendix II: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District Contact
Information (cont.)
Savannah District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Savannah District (CESAS-OP-R)
P.O. Box 889
Savannah, GA 31402-0889
Phone: 912 652-5347
Wilmington District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District (CESAW-CO-R)
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402-1890
Phone: 919 251-4630
SOUTH PACIFIC DIVISION
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
South Pacific Division (CESPD-CO-O)
630 Sansome Street, Room 1216
San Francisco, CA 94111-2206
Phone: 215 705-1443
Los Angeles District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Los Angeles District (CESPL-CO-R)
P.O. Box 2711
Los Angeles, CA 90053-2325
Phone: 213 894-5606
Sacramento District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Sacramento District (CESPK-CO-R)
1325 J Street
Sacramento, CA 95814-2922
Phone: 916 894-5606
SOUTHWKTERN DIVISION
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Southwestern Division (CESWD-CO-R)
1114 Commerce Street
Dallas, TX 75242-0216
Phone: 214 767-2436
Albuquerque District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Albuquerque District (CESWA-CO-R)
4101 Jefferson Plaza NE.
Albuquerque, NM 87109-3435
Phone: 505 342-3282'
Fort Worth District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Fort Worth District (CESWF-OD-M)
P.O. Box 17300
Fort Worth, TX 76102-0300
Phone: 817 334-2681
Galveston District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Galveston District (CESWG-CO-MO)
P.O. Box 1229
Galveston, TX 77553-1229
Phone: 409 766-3930
Little Rock District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Little Rock District (CESWL-CO-L)
P.O. Box 867
Little Rock, AR 72203-0867
Phone: 501 324-5296
A4-12
-------
Considering the Site—Appendices
Appendix II: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District Contact
Information (cont.)
Tulsa District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Tulsa District (CESWT-OD-R)
P.O. Box 61
Tulsa, OK 74121-0061
Phone: 918 669-7400
WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION
Wetlands Research Program
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Waterways Experiment Station
Environmental Lab (CESWES-EL-W)
3909 Halls Ferry Road
Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199
Phone: 601 634-2733
A4-13
-------
Considering the Site—Appendices
Appendix III: State Wellhead Protection Contact Information
REGION I
Connecticut Wellhead Protection
Fred Banach
Connecticut Department of Environmental
Protection
Water Management Bureau
79 Elm Street
Hartford, CT 06106-5127
Phone: 860 424-3020
Massachusetts Wellhead Protection
Tara Gallagher
Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection
Drinking Water Program
One Winter Street
Boston, MA 02108
Phone: 617 292-5930
e-mail: tgallagher@state.ma.us
Maine Wellhead Protection
David Braley
Maine Department of Human Services
10 State House Station
Augusta, ME 04333
Phone: 207 287-3194
Fax: 207 287-4172
New Hampshire Wellhead Protection
Sarah Pillsbury
New Hampshire Department of
Environmental Services
Water Supply Engineering Bureau
6 Hazen Drive, FOB 95
Concord, NH 03302
Phone: 603 271-1168
Fax: 603 271-2181
e-mail:pillsbury@deswspws.mv.com
Rhode Island Wellhead Protection
Ernie Panciera
Office of Drinking Water Quality
Rhode Island Department of Environment
235 Promenade Street
Providence, RI 02908
Phone: 401 227-2234, ext. 7603
Vermont Wellhead Protection
David Butterfield
Vermont Department of Environmental
Conservation
Water Supply Division
103 South Main Street
The Old Pantry
Waterbury, VT 05671-0403
Phone: 802 241-3400
Fax: 802 241-3284
REGION II
New Jersey Wellhead Protection
Daniel Van Abs
Office of Land and Water Planning
New Jersey Department of Environmental
Protection
401 E. State Street
Trenton, NJ 08625
Phone:609633-1179
Fax: 609 292-0687
New York Wellhead Protection
Warren Lavery
New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation
50 Wolf Road, Room 302
Albany, NY 12233-3504
Phone: 518 457-0791
Fax: 518 485-7786
A4-14
-------
Considering the Site—Appendices
Appendix III: State Wellhead Protection Contact Information
(cont.)
Puerto Rico Wellhead Protection
Eric Morales
Water Quality Area
Puerto Rico Environmental Quality Board
P.O. Box 11488
Santurce, PR 00910
Phone: 787 751-5548
Fax: 787 767-1962
US Virgin. Islands Wellhead Protection
Austin Moorehead
Virgin Islands Department of
Environmental Protection
Water Gut Homes 1118
Christiansted, St. Croix 00820-5065
Phone: 340 773-0565
REGION HI
Delaware Wellhead Protection
John T. Barndt
Water Supply Section
Division of Water Resources
Delaware Department of Natural Resources
and Environmental Control
P.O. Box 1401
Dover, DE 19903
Phone: 302 739-4793
Fax: 302 739-2296
e-mail: jbarndt@dnrec.state.de.us
Maryland Wellhead Protection
John Grace
Water Supply Program
Water Management Administration
2500 Broening Highway
Baltimore, MD 21224
Phone: 410 631-3714
Pennsylvania (No approved WHP)
Joseph Lee
Division of Water Supplies, llth Floor
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental
Resources
400 Market Street, Box 8467
Harrisburg, PA 17105-8467
Phone: 717 772-4018
e-mail: lee.joseph@al.dep.state.pa.us
Virginia Wellhead Protection
Terry Wagner
Ground Water Program
Virginia Department of Environmental
Quality
R O. Box 11143
Richmond, VA 23230
Phone: 804 698-4043
e-mail:tdwagner@deq.state.va.us
West Virginia Wellhead Protection
Bill Toomey
West Virginia Department of Health
Environmental Engineering Division
815 Quarrier Street, Suite 418
Charleston, WV 25301
Phone: 304 558-2981
Fax: 304 558-0691
email: wtoomey@wvdhhr.org
REGION IV
Alabama Wellhead Protection
Sonja Massey
Ground Water Branch
Department of Environmental Management
1751 Congressman W L. Dickinson Drive
P. O. Box 301463
Montgomery, AL 36130-1463
Phone: 334 271-7832
Fax: 334 271-7950
A4-15
-------
Considering the Site—Appendices
-Appendix 111: State Wellhead Protection Contact Information
(cont.)
Florida (No approved WHP)
Jim McNeal
Bureau of Water Resources Protection
Department of Environmental Protection
Twin Towers Office Building
2600 Blair Stone Road
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400
Phone: 904 488-3601
Fax: 904 487-3618
Georgia Wellhead Protection
Sandra Robertson
Georgia Geologic Survey, Room 400
19 Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive, SW
Atlanta, GA 30334
Phone: 404 656-3214
Fax: 404 657-8379
Kentucky Wellhead Protection
David Leo
Division of Water
Department of Environmental Protection
14 Reilly Road, Fort Boone Plaza
Frankfort, KY 40601
Phone: 502 564-5410
Fax: 502 564-4245
Mississippi Wellhead Protection
Jamie Crawford
Ground Water Planning Branch
P. O. Box 10385
Jackson, MS 39289-0385
Phone: 601 961-5354
Fax: 601 354-6612
North Carolina Wellhead Protection
Carl Bailey
Ground Water Section
Department of Environmental Health and
Natural Resources
P. O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626
Phone: 919 733-3221
Fax: 919 715-0588
South Carolina Wellhead Protection
Jim Hess
Ground Water Protection Division
Department of Health and Environmental
Control
2600 Bull Street
Columbia, SC 29201
Phone: 803 734-5465
Fax: 803 734-4661
Tennessee Wellhead Protection
Tom Moss
Ground Water Management Section
Division of Water Supply
Department of Environment and
Conservation
401 Church Street
Nashville, TN 37243-1549
Phone: 615 532-0170
e-mail: tmoss@mail.state.tn.us
A4-16
-------
Considering the Site—Appendices
Appendix III: State Wellhead Protection Contact Information
(cont.)
REGION V
Illinois Wellhead Protection
Rick Cobb
Division of Public Water Supplies
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield, IL 62794-9276
Phone: 217 785-4787
Fax: 217 782-0075
e-mail: epa3188@epa.il.us
Indiana Wellhead Protection
Rob Duncan
Ground Water Section
Indiana Department of Environmental
Management
P.O. Box 6015
Indianapolis, IN 46206-6015
Phone: 317 308-3322
Fax: 317 308-3339
Michigan Wellhead Protection
Steve Miller
Office of Water Resources
Michigan Department of Natural Resources
P. O. Box 30028
Lansing, MI 48909
Phone: 517 373-8804
Fax: 517 335-4053
Minnesota Wellhead Protection
Bruce Olsen
Drinking Water Protection Section
Minnesota Department of Health
PO. Box 64975
St. Paul, MN 55164-0975
Phone: 612 215-0796
Fax: 612 215-0979
e-mail: bruce.olsen@health.state.mn.us
Ohio Wellhead Protection
Mike Baker
Division of Drinking and Ground Waters
Ohio Environmental Protection Agency
P.O. Box 1049
Columbus, OH 43216-1049
Phone: 614 644-2752
Fax: 614 644-2909
e-mail: mike-baker@central.epa.ohio.gov
Wisconsin Wellhead Protection
David Lindorff
Wisconsin Department of Natural
Resources
Bureau of Drinking Water and
Groundwater
P.O. Box 7921
Madison, WI 53707-7921
Phone: 608 266-9265
Fax: 608 267-7650
email: lindod@dnr.state.wi.us
REGION VI
Arkansas Wellhead Protection
Bob Makin
Division of Engineering
Arkansas Department of Health
4815 West Markham
Little Rock, AR 72205-3867
Phone: 501 661-2136
Fax: 501 661-2032
Louisiana Wellhead Protection
Keith L. Casanova
Ground Water Protection Division
Louisiana Department of Environmental
Quality
P. O. Box 82215
Baton Rouge, LA 708 84-2215
Phone: 504 765-0585
Fax: 504 765-0602
e-mail: keithc@deq.state.la.us
A4-17
-------
Considering the Site—Appendices
Appendix III: State Wellhead Protection Contact Information
(cont.)
New Mexico Wellhead Protection
Darren Padilla
Drinking Water Bureau
New Mexico Environment Department
P.O. Box 26110
Santa Fe, NM 87501
Phone: 505 827-7536
e-mail: darren_padilla@nmenv.state.nm.us
Oklahoma Wellhead Protection
Mike Houts
Water Quality Division
Oklahoma Department of Environmental
Quality
1000 NE 10th Street
Oklahoma City, OK 73117-1212
Phone: 405 271-7899
e-mail:
michael.houts@OKLAOSEstate.ok.us
Texas Wellhead Protection
Brad Cross
Public Drinking Water Section (MC-155)
Texas Natural Resource Conservation
Commission
P.O. Box 13087
Austin TX, 78711-3087
Phone: 512 239-6020
Fax: 512 239-6050
e-mail: bcross@tnrcc.state.tx.us
REGION VH
Iowa Wellhead Protection
Darrell McAllister
Iowa Department of Natural Resources
Henery A. Wallace Building
900 E. Grand
Des Moines, Iowa 50319
Phone: 515 281-8869
Fax: 515 281-8895
Kansas Wellhead Protection
Karl Mueldener
Kansas Department of Health and
Environment
Forbes Field, Building 283
Topeka, KS 66620-0001
Phone: 913 296-5500
Fax: 913 296-5509
Missouri Wellhead Protection
John Madras
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
P. O. Box 176
Jefferson City, MO 65102
Phone: 314 751-7428
Fax: 314 751-9396
Nebraska Wellhead Protection
Dennis Heitmann
Nebraska Department of Environmental
Quality
P. O. Box 98922
Lincoln, NE 68509-8922
Phone: 402 471-0096
Fax: 402 471-2909
REGION VH
Colorado Wellhead Protection
Kathleen Reilly
Colorado Department of Health &
Environment
4300 Cherry Creek Drive South
Denver, CO 80246-1530
Phone: 303 692-3573
Fax: 303 782-0390
e-mail: kathleen.reilly@state.co.us
A4-18
-------
Considering the Site—Appendices
Appendix .111: State Wellhead Protection Contact Information
(cont.)
Montana Wellhead Protection
John Arrigo
Montana Department of Health and
Environmental Sciences
Cogswell Building
Helena, MT 59620
Phone: 406 444-5327
Fax: 406 444-5492
North Dakota Wellhead Protection
James Horner
North Dakota Department of Health
P. O. Box 5520
Bismarck, ND 58502-5520
Phone: 701 328-5216
Fax: 701 328-5200
South Dakota Wellhead Protection
Jeanne Goodman
South Dakota Department of
Environmental and Natural Resources
Joe Foss Building
523 East Capitol
Pierre, SD 57501-3181
Phone: 605 773-3296
Fax: 605 773-6035
e-mail: jeanneg@denr.state.sd.us
Utah Wellhead Protection
Sumner Newman
Utah Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Drinking Water
P.O. Box 144830
150 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4830
Phone: 801 536-4195
Fax: 801 536-4211
e-mail: snewman@deq.state.ut.us
Wyoming Wellhead Protection
Kevin Frederick
Wyoming Department of Environmental
Quality
Water Quality Division
Herschler Building
122 West 25th Street
Cheyenne, WY 82002
Phone: 307 777-5985
Fax: 307 777-5973
e-mail: kfrede@missc.state.wy.us
REGION DC
Arizona Wellhead Protection
Moncef Tihami
Arizona Department of Environmental
Quality
Water Quality Division
3033 North Central Avenue
Phoenix, AZ 85012
Phone: 602 207-4425
Fax: 602 207-4634
email: tihami.moncef@ev.state.az.us
California (No approved WHP)
Carl Hauge
Department of Water Resources
1020 9th Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: 916 327-8861
Fax: 916 327-1648
Hawaii Wellhead Protection
June Harrigan
Department of Health
Environmental Planning Office
919 Ala Moana Boulevard
Honolulu, HI 96814
Phone: 808 586-4337
Fax: 808 586-4370
A4-19
-------
Considering the Site^—Appendices
Appendix III: State Wellhead Protection Contact Information
(cont.)
Nevada Wellhead Protection.
Lucia Machado
Nevada Division of Environmental
Protection
333 West Nye Lane
Carson City, NV 89710
Phone: 702 687-4670 Ext. 3092
Fax: 702 687-6396
Northern Mariana Islands Wellhead
Protection.
Tony Guerrero
Commonwealth of Northern! Mariana
Islands
Division of Environmental Quality
Drinking Water Program
P.O. Box 1304-CK
Saipan, MP 96950
Phone:011670234-1012
Fax:011670234-1003
REGION X
Alaska (No approved WHP program)
James Weise
Drinking Water Program
Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation
555 Cordova Street
Anchorage, AK 99501
Phone: 507 269-7685
e-mail: jweise@envircon.state.ak.us
Idaho Wellhead Protection
Dean Yashan
Idaho Department of Health & Welfare
Division of Environmental Quality
1410 North Hilton Street
Boise, ID 83706
Phone: 208 373-0260
Fax: 208 373-0576
Oregon Wellhead Protection
Sheree Stewart
Drinking Water Protection Program
Oregon Department of Environmental
Quality
811 SW 6th Avenue
Portland, OR 97204-1390
Phone: 503 229-5413
Fax: 503 229-6037
e-mail: sheree.stewart@state.or.us
Washington Wellhead Protection
David Jennings
Department of Health
Division of Drinking Water
P.O. Box 47822
Olympia, WA 98504-7822
Phone: 360 586-9041
Fax: 360 586-5529
e-mail: dgj0303@hub.doh.wa.gov
A4-20
-------
Considering the Site—Appendices
Appendix IV: State Buffer Zone Considerations
The universe of industrial nonhazardous
solid wastes and unit types is broad and
diverse. States have established various
approaches to address location considerations
of the variety of wastes and units in their
states. The tables below summarize the range
of buffer zone restrictions and most common
buffer zone values specified for each unit type
by some states to address their local con-
cerns. The numbers in the tables are not
meant to advocate the adoption of a buffer
zone of any particular distance; rather, they
serve only as examples of restrictions states
have individually developed.
• Surface Impoundments. Restrictions
with respect to buffer zones vary
among states. In addition, states allow
exemptions or variances to these buffer
zone restrictions on a case-by-case
basis. Table 1 presents the range of
values and the most common value
used by states for each buffer zone
category.
Table 1
State Buffer Zone Restrictions for Surface Impoundments
Buffer Zone Category Range of Values - minimum distance Most Common Value
(number of states with restrictions) (number of states with
restrictions)
Groundwater Table
Property Boundaries
Drinking Water Wells
Public Water Supply
Surface Water Body
Houses or Buildings
Roads
1 to 15 feet (4)
100 to 200 feet (4)
1,200 to 1,320 feet (2)
500 to 1,320 feet (4)
100 to 1,320 feer (4)
300 to 1,320 feet (4)
1,000 feel (1)
5 feet (2)
100 feet (2)
1,200 feet (1)
1,320 feet (1)
1,320 feet (1)
100 feet (2)
1,320 feet (2)
1,000 feet (1)
A4-21
-------
Considering the Site—-Appendices
Appendix IV: State Buffer Zone Considerations (cont.)
. Table 2 presents the range of values and the most common state buffer zone
restrictions for landfills.
Table 2
State Buffer Zone Restrictions for Landfills
Buffer Zone Category Range of Values - minimum distance Most Common Value
(number of states with restrictions) (number of states with
restrictions)
Groundwater Table
Property Boundaries
Drinking Water Wells
Public Water Supply
Surface Water Body
Houses or Buildings
Roads
Park Land
Fault Areas
1 to 15 feet (12)
20 to 600 feet (14)
500 to 1,320 feet (9)
400 to 5,280 feet (13)
100 to 2,000 feef (20)
200 to 1,320 feet (14)
50 to 1,000 feet (8)
1,000 to 5,280 feet (7)
200 feet (2)
5 feet (4)
100 feet (7)
500 feet (2)
600 feet (2)
1,200 feet (2)
1,200 feet (3)
100 feet (5)
1,000 feet (5)
500 feet (7)
1,000 feet (5)
1,000 feet (4)
200 feet (2)
Waste Piles. Table 3 presents the state buffer zone restrictions for wastepiles. Of the four
states with buffer zone restrictions, only two states specified minimum distances.
Table 3
State Buffer Zone Restrictions for Waste Piles
^^^^^^^1 Buffer Zone Category Range of Values - minimum distance Most Common Value ^^^^^^H
i^^^^^^H (number of states with restrictions) (number of states with ^^^^^H
A4-22
Groundwater Table
Property Boundaries
Surface Water Body
Houses or Buildings or
Recreational Area
Historic Archeological Site
or Critical Habitat
4 feet* (1)
50 feet (1)
50 feet (1)
200 feet (1)
Minimum distance not (1)
specified
4 feet (1)
50 feet (1)
50 feet (1)
200 feet (1)
Minimum distance not
specified (1)
*If no liner or storage pad is used, then this state requires four feet between the waste and the seasonal
high water table.
-------
Considering the Site—Appendices
Appendix IV: State Buffer Zone Considerations (cont.)
• Land Application.1 Table 4 presents the range of values and the most common state buffer
zone restrictions for land application.
Table 4
. State Buffer Zone Restrictions for Land Application
Buffer Zone Category Range of Values - minimum distance Most Common Value
(number of states with restrictions) (number of states with
restrictions)
Groundwater Table
Property Boundaries
Drinking Water Wells
Public Water Supply
Surface Water Body
Houses or Buildings
Park Land
Fault Areas
Max. Depth of Treatment
Pipelines
Critical Habitat
Soil Conditions
4 to 5 feet
50 to 200 feet
200 to 500 feet
300 to 5,280 feef
100 to 1,000 feet
200 to 3,000 feet
2,640 feet
200 feet
5 feet
25 feet
(3)
(4)
(2)
(3)
(5)
(6)
(1)
CD
(1)
(1)
No minimum distance set (2)
Not on frozen, ice or snow covered, or
water saturated soils (1)
4 feet (1)
5 feet (1)
50 feet (2)
200 feet (1)
300 feet (1)
1,000 feet (1)
5,280 feet (1)
100 feet (2)
300 feet (2)
2,640 feet (1)
200 feet (1)
5 feet (1)
25 feet (1)
No minimum
distance set (2)
Not on frozen, ice or snow
covered, or water saturated
soils (2)
'In the review of state regulations performed to develop Table 4, it was not possible to distinguish
between units used for treatment and units where wastes are added as a soil amendment. We recommend
that you consult applicable state agencies to determine which buffer zone restrictions are relevant to your
land application unit.
A4-23
-------
Considering the Site—•Appendices
Appendix IV: State Buffer Zone Considerations (cont.)
Based on the review of state requirements, Table 5 presents the most common buffer zones
restrictions across all four unit types.
Table 5
Common Buffer Zone Restrictions Across All Four Unit Types
Buffer Zone Category Most Common Values
(total number of states for all unit types (number of states with restrictions)
Groundwater Table
Property Boundaries
Drinking Water Wells
Public Water Supply
Surface Water Body
Houses or Buildings
(20)
(23)
(13)
(20)
(30)
(25)
4 feet
5 feet
50 feet
100 feet
500 feet
1,000 feet
1,200 feet
100 feet
200 feet
1,000 feet
500 feet
(4)
(4)
(8)
(5)
(3)
(3)
(3)
(5)
(5)
(5)
(9)
A4-24
-------
PROTECTING AIR QUALITY
APPENDICES
-------
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Appendices
Appendix I: General Information About the Clean Air Act
Internet and Other Computer Resources
OAR World Wide Web Site -
EPA's Office of Air and Radiation (OAR) is responsible for many programs designed to reduce air
pollution and improve public health nationwide. OAR's web site provides a wide range of informa-
tion, including fact sheets, brochures, and other documents on such topics as ozone depletion,
acid rain, radon, urban air quality, global warming, pollution from mobile sources, and much
more. Links are provided to each program office and to a search function. Visitors can read numer-
ous fact sheets, regulations, and other documents online, print diem directly from the site, or
download them for later use. Information about the structure of the Office and key contacts is also
available. Please note that the world wide address is all lower case.
Airlinks Web Page -
The Airlinks page provides an excellent overview of air pollution topics in the news. Information
and links are updated frequently as air pollution "hot topics" change from month to month.
Airlinks also provides links to other major OAR web sites and information resources.
Technology Transfer Network CTTN)
The TTN is a web site that contains general information on Clean Air Act issues and programs,
regulations, guidance documents, and fact sheets that can be accessed electronically by the public.
Written Materials
The Plain English Guide to tiie Clean Mr Act (1993)
Explains in non-technical, straightforward language the provisions of the Clean Air Act of 1990.
EPA400-K-93-001. Available from the National Center for Environmental Publications (NCEPI)
800 490-9198, and online at .
What You. Can Do to Reduce Air Pollution (1992)
A citizen's guide to what individuals can do to help meet die goals of the Clean Air Act of 1990.
Also oudines the causes and effects of air pollution. EPA450-K-92-002. Available from NCEPI 800
490-9198, and online at .
The Clean Air Act of 1990: A Primer on Consensus-Bunding (1992)
Outlines collaborative decision-making processes to assist agencies, organizations, and individuals
embarking on consensus-building activities in the implementation of die Clean Air Act. EPA450-K-
92-004. Available from NCEPI 800 490-9198, and online at ublications.htm>.
A5-1
-------
Protecting Air Quality^—Appendices
Appendix I: General Information About the Clean Air Act
(cont.)
The Clean. Mr Act Amendments of 1990: Overview and of Summary Materials 0.990)
Contains an overview of the Clean Air Act of 1990, one page summaries of the key titles, a
glossary of terms, and a legislative chronology. This document serves as useful background on
the Clean Air Act. EPA450-K-90-100. Available from NCEPI 800 490-9198, and online at
.
Implementation Strategy for the Clean Air Act of 1990: Update July, 1997
Summarizes plans to implement the Clean Air Act of 1990 within the time frames set by
Congress. Multi-year document. EPA410-K-97-001. Available from NCEPI 800 490-9198,
and online at .
EPA Journal, The New Clean Air Act: What it Means to You (1991)
This entire edition of the Journal is devoted to discussions of various issues related to the
Clean Air Act. Volume 17, No. 1, January/February 1991. EPA21K-1004. Available from
NCEPI 800 490-9198, and online at .
The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990: A Guide for SmaU Businesses 0-992)
Explains how the various parts of the Clean Air Act can affect small businesses and how small
businesses can obtain information and assistance. EPA450-K-92-001. Available from NCEPI
800 490-9198, and online at .
Videotapes
OZONE: Double Trouble (1993)
This 18-minute video describes for the layperson the differences between stratospheric ozone
and ground-level ozone (smog), how ground-level and stratospheric ozone can affect public
health and the environment, and what people can do to improve air quality. OZONE: Double
Trouble answers these questions in a dynamic style, with simple language, and effective visuals.
Contact Dennis Shipman, 919 541-5477.
Accessing EPA Information (1996)
This telecourse provides an overview and guided tour of the various means of electronic access
to EPA and other public sector sources of environmental information. Widely available and
practical tools and techniques including modem connections to the Internet are described.
Limited quantities available for loan. Contact Dennis Shipman, 919 541-5477.
Clean Air Act Update
During this annual telecourse, EPA representatives discuss issues and programs underway in
implementing the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. Features include Title I nonattainment
provisions, status of implementation of the Title V operating permits program, the Title III air
toxics provision, and other Clean Air Act issues. Limited quantities available for loan.
Contact Dennis Shipman, 919 541-5477.
A5-2
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Appendices
Appendix I: General Information About the Clean Air Act
(cont.)
ACID RAIN PROGRAM
Internet Resources and Telephone Hotlines
Acid Rain Program World Wide Web Site -
Features fact sheets, press releases, program reports, the latest information on emissions and
the allowance market, guidance documents, and regulations. Student resources also available.
Acid Rain Hotline - 202 233-9620
This voicemail system provides fact sheets and other information about acid rain and its effects
via fax and mail. Callers may also leave technical and policy questions and a staff member will
respond within 24 hours.
Written Materials
Acid Rain Program Brochures
The Acid Rain Program offers two brochures titled The Add Rain Program - It's Working
(EPA430-F-92-027) and Environmental Benefits of Reducing Acid Rain (EPA430-F-92-026). These
brochures describe the causes and effects of acid rain, how EPA is reducing acid rain, and the
benefits of this reduction. Available from NCEPI 800 490-9198, and online at
ublications.htm>.
Acid Rain Fact Sheets
Fact sheets are available on all aspects of the program, including:
Program Overview
Environmental Benefits of Acid Rain Reduction
Allowance System
Allowance Auctions and Sales
Allowance Allocations
Permits
Continuous Emissions Monitoring
Excess Emissions
Opt-in Program
Annual Data Reconciliation
NOx Program
Available from the Acid Rain Hotline, 202 233-9620.
US/Canada Air Quality Progress Report (1996)
Published jointly with the government of Canada, this interim report discusses the effects of
acid rain in both countries. The report also contains general information on the US-Canada Air
Quality Agreement. Available from the Acid Rain Hotline, 202 233-9620.
A5-3
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Appendices
Appendix I: General Information About the Clean Air Act
(cont.)
Acid Rain, A Student's First Sourcebook (1994)
Simple and concise educational text that explores the effects of acid rain on human health,
forests, water quality, and buildings. The sourcebook also provides experiments and activities
that demonstrate the effects of acid rain. EPA600-9-90-027A. Available from NCEPI 800 490-
9198, and online at .
Acid Bain Program Update
Periodic publication widi information on new developments related to acid rain, including
ongoing reports on program progress and results. Available from the Acid Rain Hotline,
202 233-9620.
Emissions Scorecard
Annual publication detailing trends in heat input and emissions of sulfur dioxide ($02), 2
nitrous oxides (NOx), and carbon dioxide (COi) in the electric utility industry. Includes 2
state-wide and national totals in each category. Available from the Acid Rain Hotline,
202 233-9620.
Compliance Results (1995)
A summary of the first year of compliance with the Acid Rain Program. Shows the emissions
reductions of affected utility units, environmental gains, monitoring performance, and program
efficiency. Contains details of the 1995 annual data reconciliation. Available from the Acid
Rain Hodine, 202 233-9620.
Human Health Benefits from Sulfate Reductions Under Tide IV of the 1990 Clean Air Act
The result of a two-year study on health benefits of reducing atmospheric sulfate aerosol con-
centrations, tills study finds tiiat annual US health benefits will be between $3 billion and $11
billion in 1997, and between $12 billion and $40 billion when the program is fully implement-
ed in 2010. Available from die Acid Rain Hotline, 202-233-9620.
Acid Deposition Standard Feasibility Study
Report to Congress on the feasibility and effectiveness of a,standard to protect sensitive ecosys-
tems from acid deposition. Integrates ecological research, emission and source-receptor model-
ing, and implementation and cost evaluations. Available from die Acid Rain Hotline,
202 233-9620.
AIR TOXICS REDUCTION
Internet Resources
Unified Air Toxics Website -
This site provides a wide range of information on EPA's air toxics program, including health
effects information and plain-English fact sheets on air toxics regulations.
A5-4
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Appendices
Appendix I: General information About the Clean Air Act
(cont.)
Written Materials
Bisk Assessment for Toxic Air Pollutants: A Citizen's Guide
This short booklet describes in plain-English the process used in determining health risks asso-
ciated with exposure to toxic air pollutants. Available from the EPA's Control Technology
Center Hotline, 919 541-0800.
Evaluating Exposures to Toxic Air Pollutants: A Citizen's Guide
Exposure assessment is part of the risk assessment process. This short booklet describes in
plain English how exposure assessment is used to determine to what extent and/or how many
people are exposed to toxic air pollutants. Available from the EPA's Control Technology Center
Hotline, 919 541-0800.
A Guidebook on How to Comply with, the Chromium Electroplating and Anodizing National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (1995)
Provides general information on how to comply with the regulation to reduce air toxics emis-
sions from chromium electroplating operations. EPA453-B-95-001. Available from the EPA's
Control Technology Center Hotline, 919 541-0800.
Guidance Document for the Halogenated Solvent Cleaner National Emission Standards for Hazardous
Air Pollutants 0993)
Provides general information on how to comply with the regulation to reduce air toxics emis-
sions from halogenated solvent cleaning operations (degreasers). EPA453-R-04-081.Available
from the EPA's Control Technology Center Hotline, 919 541-0800.
New Regulation Controlling Emissions From Dry Cleaners 0994)
This brochure provides general information on how to comply with the air toxics regulation for
dry cleaners. EPA453-F-94-025. Available from the EPA's Control Technology Center Hotline,
919 541-0800.
The EPA Great Waters Program: An Introduction to the Issues and the Ecosystems (1994)
This short booklet provides basic information about how air pollution contributes to water
quality problems in the "Great Waters," including the Great Lakes, Lake Champlain, the
Chesapeake Bay and certain other coastal waters. EPA453-B-94-030. Available from the EPA's
Control Technology Center Hotline, 919 541-0800.
Chemical Accident Prevention and Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
General information concerning the provisions of the Clean Air Act relating to prevention and
management of accidental chemical releases. Available from the Emergency Planning and
Community Right-to-Know Hotline, 800 535-0202.
A5-5
-------
Protecting Air Q^ty^-Appendices
Appendix II: EPA Regional Air Program Contacts and State
Air Pollution Control Agencies
EPA Regional Air Program
Contacts
US. EPA Region. 1
Air Quality Hotline
JFK Federal Building
Boston, MA 02203
Phone: 800821-1237
U.S. EPA Region 2
Division of Environmental Planning and
Protection (DEPP)
Air Programs Branch
290 Broadway; 26th Floor
New York, NY 10007-1866
Phone: 212637-3725
U.S. EPA Region 3
Air and Toxics Section
Air Protection Division
841 Chestnut Building
Philadelphia, PA 19107
Phone: 212566-2691
U.S. EPA Region 4
Air, Pesticides, and Toxic Management
Division
Atlanta Federal Center
61 Forsyth Street, SW
Atlanta, GA 30303-3104
Phone: 404562-9077
U.S. EPA Region 5
Air and Radiation Division
77 West Jackson Boulevard (A-18J)
Chicago, 1L 60604
Phone: 312353-2212
U.S. EPA Region 6
Multimedia Planning and Permitting
Division
Air Program
First Interstate Bank Tower
1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200
Dallas, TX 75202-2733
Phone: 214665-7200
U.S. EPA Region 7
Air, RCRA and Toxics Division
726 Minnesota Avenue
Kansas City, KS 66101
Phone: 913 551-7020
U.S. EPA Region 8
Pollution Prevention, State and Tribal
Assistance
Air Program
999 18th Street, Suite 500
Denver, CO 80202-2466
Phone: 303312-6005
U.S. EPA Region 9
Air Division
75 Hawthorne Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
Phone: 415 744-1219
U.S. EPA Region 10
1200 Sixth Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101
Phone: 206553-2963
A5-6
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Appendices
Appendix II: EPA Regional Air Program Contacts and State
Air Pollution Control Agencies (cont.)
State Air Pollution Control
Agencies
ALABAMA
Department of Environmental Management
Air Division
1751 Congress WL Dickenson Drive
Montgomery, AL 36130
Phone: 334271-7861
ALASKA
Department of Environmental
Conservation
Air and Water Quality Division
410 Willoughby Avenue, Suite 105
Juneau,AK 99801-1795
Phone: 907465-5100
ARIZONA
Department of Environmental Quality
Air Quality Division
3033 North Central Avenue, Fifth Floor
Phoenix, AZ 85012
Phone: 602207-2308
ARKANSAS
Department of Pollution Control and
Ecology
Air Division
8001 National Drive
P.O. Box 8913
Little Rock, AR 72219-8913
Phone: 501 682-0750
CALIFORNIA
Air Resources Board
P.O. Box 2815
Sacramento, CA 95812
Phone: 916445-4383
COLORADO
Department of Health
Air Pollution Control Division B-l
4300 Cherry Creek Drive South
Denver, CO 80222-1530
Phone: 303 692-3100
CONNECTICUT
Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Air Management
79 Elm Street
Hartford, CT 06106
Phone: 860424-3026
DELAWARE
Department of Natural Resources and
Environmental Control
Division of Air and Waste Management
Air Quality Management Section
156 South State Street
Dover, DE 19901
Phone: 302 739-4791
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
D.C. Department of Consumer and
Regulatory Affairs
Environmental Regulation Administration
Air Resources Management Division
2100 Martin Luther King Avenue, SE.,
Suite 203
Washington DC 20020-5732
Phone: 202 645-6093, ext. 3067
FLORIDA
Department of Environmental Protection
Air Resources Management
Mail Station 5500
2600 Blair Stone Road
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400
Phone: 904488-0114
A5-7
-------
Protecting Air Quality—-Appendices
Appendix II: EPA Regional Air Program Contacts and State
Air Pollution Control Agencies (cont.)
GEORGIA
Department of Natural Resources
Environmental Protection Division
Air Protection Branch
4244 International Parkway, Suite 120
Atlanta, GA 30354
Phone: 404363-7000
HAWAII
Department of Health
Clean Air Branch
P.O. Box 3378
Honolulu, HI 96801
Phone: 808586-4200
IDAHO
Division of Environmental Quality
Permits and Enforcement
1410 North Hilton, Third Floor
Boise, ID 83706
Phone: 208373-0502
ILLINOIS
Environmental Protection Agency
Bureau of Air
2200 Churchill Road
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield, IL 62794-9276
Phone: 217785-4140
INDIANA
Department of Environmental Management
Office of Air Management
100 North Senate Avenue
Indianapolis, IN 46206-6015
Phone: 317232-5586
IOWA
Department of Natural Resources
Air Quality Bureau
7900 Hickman Road, Suite One
Urbandale, IA 50322
Phone: 515281-8852
KANSAS
Department of Health and Environment
Bureau of Air and Radiation
Forbes Field, Building 740
Topeka, KS 66620
Phone: 913296-1593
KENTUCKY
Department for Environmental Protection
Division for Air Quality
803 Schenkel Lane
Frankfort, KY 40601
Phone: 502573-3382
LOUISIANA
Department of Environmental Quality
Office of Air Quality and Radiation
Protection
P.O. Box 82135
Baton Rouge, LA 70884-2135
Phone: 504765-0219
MAINE
Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Air Quality Control
State House, Station 17
Augusta, ME 04333
Phone: 207287-2437
MARYLAND
Department of the Environment
Air and Radiation Management
Administration
2500 Broening Highway
Baltimore, MD 21224
Phone: 410631-3255
MASSACHUSETTS
Department of Environmental Protection
Division of Air Quality Control
One Winter Street, Seventh Floor
Boston, MA 02108
Phone: 617292-5630
A5-8
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Appendices
Appendix II: EPA Regional Air Program Contacts and State
Air Pollution Control Agencies (cont.)
MICHIGAN
Department of Environmental Quality
Air Quality Division
PO Box 30260
Lansing, MI 48909 -7760
Phone: 517373-7023
MINNESOTA
Pollution Control Agency
Air Quality Division
520 Lafayette Road
St. Paul, MN 55155
Phone: 612296-7331
MISSISSIPPI
Department of Environmental Quality
Office of Pollution Control
Air Division
P.O. Box 10385
Jackson, MS 39289
Phone: 601 961-5171
MISSOURI
Department of Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Quality
Air Pollution Control Program
PO. Box 176
Jefferson City, MO 65102
Phone: 573751-4817
MONTANA
Department of Environmental Quality
Air and Waste Management Bureau
Medcalf Building
P.O. Box 200901
Helena, MT 59620-0901
Phone: 406444-3454
NEBRASKA
Department of Environmental Quality
Air and Waste Management Division
1200 North Street, Suite 400
P.O. Box 98922
Lincoln, NE 68509-8922
Phone: 402471-0001
NEVADA
Division of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Air Quality
333 West Nye Lane
Carson City, NV 89710
Phone: 702 687-4670
NEW HAMPSHIRE
Department of Environmental Services
Air Resources Division
64 North Main Street
Caller Box 2033
Concord, NH 03301
Phone: 603271-1370
NEW JERSEY
Department of Environmental Protection
Office of Air Quality Management
401 East State Street, Seventh Floor West
Trenton, NJ 08625
Phone: 609292-6710
NEWMEXICO
Environmental Department
Environmental Protection Division
Air Quality Bureau
Harold Runnels Building
Room S2100
P.O. Box 26110
Santa Fe, NM 87502
Phone: 505827-0031
A5-9
-------
Protecting Air Quality—.Appendices
•Appendix II: EPA Regional Air Program Contacts and State
Air Pollution Control Agencies (cont.)
NEW YORK
Department of Environmental
Conservation
Division of Air Resources
50 Wolf Road
Albany, NY 12233-3250
Phone: 518457-7230
NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environment, Health, and
Natural Resources
Division of Air Quality
P.O. Box 29580
Raleigh, NC 27626-0580
Phone: 919 715-6232
NORTH DAKOTA
Department of Health
Division of Environmental Engineering
1200 Missouri Avenue, Room 304
P.O. Box 5520
Bismarck, ND 58506-5520
Phone: 701328-5188
OHIO
Environment Protection Agency
Division of Air Pollution Control
P.O. Box 1049
Columbus, OH 43216-0149
Phone: 614644-2270
OKLAHOMA
Department of Environmental Quality
Air Quality Division
4545 North Lincoln Boulevard, Suite 250
Oklahoma City, OH 73105-3483
Phone: 405290-8247
OREGON
Department of Environmental Quality
Air Quality Division
811 SW Sixth Avenue
Portland, OR 97204
Phone: 503229-5359
PENNSYLVANIA
Department of Environmental Resources
Bureau of Air Quality Control
400 Market Street
P.O. Box 8468
Harrisburg, PA 17105-8468
Phone: 717787-9702
RHODE ISLAND
Department of Environmental Management
Division of Air Resources
235 Promenade Street
Providence, RI 02908-5767
Phone: 401277-2808
SOUTH CAROLINA
Department of Health and Environmental
Control
Bureau of Air Quality Control
2600 Bull Street
Columbia, SC 29201
Phone: 803 734-4750
SOUTH DAKOTA
Department of Environmental and Natural
Resources
Air and Surface Water Program
523 East Capitol Avenue
Joe Foss Building
Pierre, SD 57501
Phone: 605 773-3351
A5-10
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Appendices
Appendix II: EPA Regional Air Program Contacts and State
Air Pollution Control Agencies (cont.)
TENNESSEE
Department of Environment and
Conservation
Division of Air Pollution Control
401 Church Street, Ninth Floor
L & C Annex
Nashville, TN 37243-1531
Phone: 615532-0554
TEXAS
Texas Natural Resource Conservation
Commission
Office of Policy and Regulatory
Development
P.O. Box 13087
Austin, TX 78711-3087
Phone: 512 239-5818
UTAH
Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Air Quality
150 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-4820
Phone: 801 536-4000
VERMONT
Agency of Natural Resources
Air Pollution Control Division
103 South Main Street
Building Three South
Waterbury, VT 05676
Phone: 802241-3840
VIRGINIA
Department of Environmental Quality
Air Division
P.O. Box 10009
Richmond, VA 23240
Phone: 804698-4311
WASHINGTON
Department of Ecology
Air Program
P.O. Box 47600
Olympia, WA 98504-7600
Phone: 360407-6800
WEST VIRGINIA
Division of Environmental Protection
Office of Air Quality
1558 Washington Street, East
Charleston, WV 25311
Phone: 304558-3286
WISCONSIN
Department of Natural Resources
Bureau of Air Management (AM/10)
P.O. Box 7921
Madison, WI 53707
Phone: 608266-7718
WYOMING
Department of Environmental Quality
Air Quality Division
122 West 25th Street
Cheyenne, WY 82002
Phone: 307777-7391
AMERICAN SAMOA
Environmental Quality Commission
Governor's Office
Pago Pago, AS 96799
Phone: 684633-4116
GUAM
Environmental Protection Agency
Air Pollution Program
Harmon Plaza
Complex Unit D-107
130 Rojas Street
Harmon, GU 96911
Phone: 671 646-8863
A5-11
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Appendices
Appendix II: EPA Regional Air Program Contacts and State
Air Pollution. Control Agencies (cent.)
PUERTO RICO
Environmental Quality Board
Air Program
Ponce de Leon Avenue #431
Hatorey, PR 00917
Phone: 809 767-8129
VIRGIN ISLANDS
Division of Environmental Protection
Department of Planning and Natural
Resources
396-1 Foster Plaza
Annas Retreat
Charlotte Amalie
St. Thomas, VI 00802
Phone: 809 774-3320
A5-12
-------
Protecting Air Quality1—Appendices
Appendix III: Summary of Airborne Emission Regulations
for Hazardous Waste Management Units
Subpart AA regulates organic emissions from process vents associated with distillation, frac-
tionation, thin film evaporation, solvent extraction, and air or stream stripping operations.1
Subpart AA only applies to these types of units managing hazardous waste streams with organ-
ic concentration levels of at least 10 parts per million by weight (ppmw). Subpart AA regula-
tions require facilities with covered process vents to either reduce total organic emissions from
all affected process vents at the facility to below 3 Ib/h and 3.1 tons/year, or reduce emissions
from all process vents by 95 percent through the use of a control device, such as a closed-vent
system, vapor recovery unit, flare, or other combustion unit.
Subpart BB sets inspection and maintenance requirements for equipment, such as valves,
pumps, compressors, pressure relief devices, sampling connection systems, open-ended valves
or lines, flanges, or control devices that contain or contact hazardous wastes with organic con-
centrations of at least 10 percent by weight.2 Subpart BB does not establish numeric criteria for
reducing emissions, it simply establishes monitoring, leak detection, and repair requirements.
Subpart CC establishes controls on tanks, surface impoundments, and containers in which
hazardous waste has been placed.3 It applies only to units containing hazardous waste with an
average organic concentration greater than 500 ppmw. Units managing hazardous waste that
has been treated to reduce the concentrations of organics by 95 percent are exempt. Non-
exempt surface impoundments must have either a rigid cover or, if wastes are not agitated or
heated, a floating membrane cover. Closed vent systems are required to control the emissions
from covered surface impoundments. These control systems must achieve the same 95 percent
emission reductions described above under Subpart AA.
HO CFR §§ 264.1030-1036.
HO CFR §§ 264.1050-1065.
HO CFR §§ 264.1080-1091.
A5-13
-------
Protecting Air Quality^-Appendices
Appendix IV: Example List of Chemical Suppressants'
Type
Bitumens
Salts
Adhesives
Product
AMS 2200, 2300®
Coherex®
Docal 1002®
Peneprime®
Petro Tac P®
Resinex®
Retain®
Calcium chloride
Dowflake, Liquid Dow®
DP-10®
Dust Ban 8806®
Dustgard®
Sodium silicate
Acrylic DLR-MS®
Bio Cat 300-1®
CPB-12®
Curasol AK®
DCL-40A, 1801, 1803®
DC-859, 875®
Dust Ban®
Flambinder®
Lignosite®
Norlig A, 12®
Orzan Series®
Soil Gard®
Manufacturer
Arco Mine Sciences
Witco Chemical
Douglas Oil Company
Utah Emulsions
Syntech Products Corporation
Neyra Industries, Inc.
Dubois Chemical Company
Allied Chemical Corporation
Dow Chemical
Wen-Don Corporation
Nalco Chemical Company
G.S.L. Minerals and
Chemicals Corporation
The PQ Corporation
Rohm and Haas Company
Applied Natural Systems, Inc.
Wen-Don Corporation
American Hoechst
Corporation
Calgon Corporation
Betz Laboratories, Inc.
Nalco Chemical Company
Flambeau Paper Company
Georgia Pacific Corporation
Reed Lignin, Inc.
Crown Zellerbach Corporation
Walsh Chemical
Source: U.S. EPA. 1989. Hazardous Waste TSDF—Fugitive Paniculate Matter Air Emissions Guidance
Document. EPA450-3-89-019.
'Mention of trade names or commercial products is not intended to constitute endorsement or recom-
mendation for use.
A5-14
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Appendices
Appendix 111: Summary of Airborne Emission Regulations
for Hazardous Waste Management Units
Subpart AA regulates organic emissions from process vents associated with distillation, frac-
tionation, thin film evaporation, solvent extraction, and air or stream stripping operations.1
Subpart AA only applies to these types of units managing hazardous waste streams with organ-
ic concentration levels of at least 10 parts per million by weight (ppmw). Subpart AA regula-
tions require facilities with covered process vents to either reduce total organic emissions from
all affected process vents at the facility to below 3 Ib/h and 3.1 tons/year, or reduce emissions
from all process vents by 95 percent through the use of a control device, such as a closed-vent
system, vapor recovery unit, flare, or other combustion unit.
Subpart BB sets inspection and maintenance requirements for equipment, such as valves,
pumps, compressors, pressure relief devices, sampling connection systems, open-ended valves
or lines, flanges, or control devices that contain or contact hazardous wastes with organic con-
centrations of at least 10 percent by weight.2 Subpart BB does not establish numeric criteria for
reducing emissions, it simply establishes monitoring, leak detection, and repair requirements.
Subpart CC establishes controls on tanks, surface impoundments, and containers in which
hazardous waste has been placed.3 It applies only to units containing hazardous waste with an
average organic concentration greater than 500 ppmw. Units managing hazardous waste that
has been treated to reduce the concentrations of organics by 95 percent are exempt. Non-
exempt surface impoundments must have either a rigid cover or, if wastes are not agitated or
heated, a floating membrane cover. Closed vent systems are required to control the emissions
from covered surface impoundments. These control systems must achieve the same 95 percent
emission reductions described above under Subpart AA.
'40 CFR§§ 264.1030-1036.
HO CFR §§ 264.1050-1065.
HO CFR §§ 264.1080-1091.
A5-15
-------
Protecting Air Quality—Appendices
Appendix IV: Example List of Chemical Suppressants'
Type
Bitumens
Salts
Adhesives
Product
AMS 2200, 2300®
Coherex®
Docal 1002®
Peneprime®
Petro Tac P®
Resinex®
Retain®
Calcium chloride
Dowflake, Liquid Dow®
DP-10®
Dust Ban 8806®
Dustgard®
Sodium silicate
Acrylic DLR-MS®
Bio Cat 300-1®
CPB-12®
Curasol AK®
DCL-40A, 1801, 1803®
DC-859, 875®
Dust Ban®
Flambinder®
Lignosite®
Norlig A, 12®
Orzan Series®
Soil Card®
Manufacturer
Arco Mine Sciences
Witco Chemical
Douglas Oil Company
Utah Emulsions
Syntech Products Corporation
Neyra Industries, Inc.
Dubois Chemical Company
Allied Chemical Corporation
Dow Chemical
Wen-Don Corporation
Nalco Chemical Company
G.S.L. Minerals and
Chemicals Corporation
The PQ Corporation
Rohm and Haas Company
Applied Natural Systems, Inc.
Wen-Don Corporation
American Hoechst
Corporation
Calgon Corporation
Betz Laboratories, Inc.
Nalco Chemical Company
Flambeau Paper Company
Georgia Pacific Corporation
Reed Lignin, Inc.
Crown Zellerbach Corporation
Walsh Chemical
Source: U.S. EPA. 1989. Hazardous Waste TSDF—Fugitive Paniculate Matter Air Emissions Guidance
Document. EPA450-3-89-019.
*Mention of trade names or commercial products is not intended to constitute endorsement or recom-
mendation for use.
A5-16
-------
PROTECTING SURFACE WATER
APPENDICES
-------
-------
Protecting Surface Water —Appendices
Appendix I: Pretreatment Fact Sheet and FAQ
Industrial Pretreatment
The National Pretreatment Program is a cooperative effort of federal, state, and local regulatory
environmental agencies established to protect water quality. The program is designed to reduce
the level of pollutants discharged by industry and other non-domestic wastewater sources into
municipal sewer systems, and thereby, reduce the amount of pollutants released into the envi-
ronment through wastewater. The objectives of the program are to protect the Publicly Owned
Treatment Works (POTW) from pollutants that may interfere with plant operation, to prevent
pollutants that may pass through untreated from being introduced into the POTW, and to
improve opportunities for the POTW to reuse wastewater and sludges that are generated. The
term "pretreatment" refers to the requirement that nondomestic sources discharging wastewater
to POTWs control their discharges, and meet limits established by EPA, the State, or local
authority on the amount of pollutants allowed to be discharged. The control of the pollutants
may necessitate treatment prior to discharge to the POTW (therefore the term "pretreatment").
Limits may be met by the nondomestic source through pollution prevention techniques (prod-
uct substitution recycle and reuse of materials) or treatment of the wastewater.
Program objectives are:
To prevent industrial facilities' pollutant discharges from passing through municipal wastewater
treatment plants untreated;
To protect treatment plants from the threat posed by untreated industrial wastewater, including
explosion, fire, and interference with the treatment process; and
To improve the quality of effluents and sludges so that they can be used for beneficial purposes.
There are more than 1500 publicly owned treatment works that are required to implement
local pretreatment programs. By reducing the level of pollutants discharged by industry into
municipal sewage systems, the program ensures the protection of America's multi-billion dollar
public investment in treatment infrastructure.
Pretreatment Facts:
REGULATORY PROVISIONS
General PT Regulations (40 CFR Part 403)
—Objectives: prevent pass through and interference (including preventing interference with
sludge use and disposal); promote beneficial re-use of effluents and sludges. (See 403.2)
—National prohibited discharge standards: temperature, pH, explosive, etc. (See 403.5)
—Application of national categorical pretreatment standards (See 403.6)
—Requirements for State and local Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) programs (See
403.8(f) and 403.10)
-Reporting requirements for POTWs and Industrial Users (IU) (See 403.12)
A6-1
-------
Protecting Surface Water —-Appendices
Appendix I: Pretreatment Fact Sheet and FAQ (cont.) -
—Other requirements (e.g., PDF variances, net/gross adjustments) (See 403.13 - 403.17)
—Categorical Pretreatment Standards (40 CFR Parts 405 - 471)
PROGRAM STATUS
—31 of 42 NPDES States have approved Pretreatment programs.
—Approximately 1600 POTWs are required to implement Pretreatment programs.
—Pretreatment POTWs receive 80% of national wastewater flow (~ 30 billion gals/day).
—An estimated 270,000 Industrial Users (lUs) discharge to POTWs, of which there are 31,842
Significant Industrial Users (SIUs); 14,914 of the SIUs are subject to categorical standards;
16,928 of the remaining SIUs are defined by one of the following criteria: 25,000 gallons per
day process flow; 5% of hydraulic or organic flow of POTW; reasonable potential to cause
pass through or interference.
Industrial Pretreatment - Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What is the National Pretreatment Program?
A: The National Pretreatment Program is designed to reduce the amount of pollutants dis-
charged by industry and other non-domestic wastewater sources into municipal sewer systems,
and thereby, reduce the amount of pollutants released into the environment from publicly
owned wastewater treatment plants. The program is a cooperative effort of federal, state, and
local regulatory environmental agencies established to protect water quality. The objectives of
the program are to protect the Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) or municipal waste-
water treatment facility from pollutants that may interfere with plant operation or pass through
the plant untreated and to improve opportunities for the POTW to reuse treated wastewater
and sludges (biosolids) that are generated. The term "pretreatment" refers to pollutant control
requirements for nondomestic sources discharging wastewater to sewer systems that are con-
nected to POTWs. Limits on the amount of pollutants allowed to be discharged are established
by EPA, the State, or the local authority. Pretreatment limits may be met by the industry
through pollution prevention (e.g., production substitution, recycling and reuse of materials)
or treatment of the wastewater.
Q: Under what Statutory Authority is the Pretreatment Program Administered?
A: The National Pretreatment Program's authority comes from section 307 of the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act (more commonly referred to as the Clean Water Act). The federal gov-
ernment's role in pretreatment began with the passage of the Clean Water Act in 1972. The Act
called for EPA to develop national pretreatment standards to control industrial discharges into
sewerage systems.
A6-2
-------
Protecting Surface Water —Appendices
Appendix I: Pretreatment Fact Sheet and FAQ (cont.)
Q: Are Acre any prescribed National Standards for Pretreatment?
A: There are two sets of standards: "categorical Pretreatment Standards" and "Prohibited
Discharge Standards." These are uniform national requirements which restrict the level of pol-
lutants that may be discharged by nondomestic sources to sanitary sewer systems. All POTWs
that are required to implement a Pretreatment Program must enforce the federal standards.
Q: What are Categorical Pretreatment Standards?
A: These are technology-based limitations on pollutant discharges to POTWs promulgated by
EPA in accordance with Section 307 of the Clean water Act that apply to specified process
wastewaters of particular industrial categories [see 40 CFR 403.6 and 40 CFR Parts 405- 471]
Q: What are Prohibited Discharge Standards?
A: These are standards that prohibit the discharge of wastes that pass through or interfere with
POTW operations (including sludge management). These are the general prohibitions. There
are also specific prohibitions that prohibit the discharge from all nondomestic sources certain
types of wastes that 1) create a fire or explosion hazard in the collection system or treatment
plant, 2) are corrosive, including any discharge with a pH less than 5.0, unless the POTW is
specifically designed to handle such wastes, 3) are solid or viscous pollutants in amounts that
will obstruct the flow in the collection system and treatment plant, resulting in interference
with operations, 4) any pollutant discharged in quantities sufficient to interfere with POTW
operations, and 5) discharges with temperatures above 140° F (40° C) when they reach the
treatment plant, or hot enough to interfere with biological processes.
Q: When were the federal regulations governing pretreatment program requirements first promulgated
and where can I find them?
A: The General Pretreatment Regulations were originally published in 1978, and have been
updated several times (the latest changes were made on July 17, 1997) and can be found in the
Code of Federal Regulations in 40 CFR Part 403.
A6-3
-------
Protecting Surface Water —Appendices
Appendix II: State Storm-water Offices
ALABAMA
Alabama Dept. of Environmental
Management Industrial Section
P.O. Box 301463
Montgomery, AL 36130-1463
Phone: 334 271-7847
ALASKA
Department of Environmental
Conservation
Division of Air and Water Quality
410 Willovenby Avenue
Juneau, AK 99801-1795
Phone: 907 465-5300
Fax Number: 907 465-5274
ARIZONA
Arizona Department of Water Resources
Flood Mitigation Department
500 North Third Street
Phoenix, AZ 85004
Phone: 602 417-2445
Fax: 602 417-2401
Internet: www.adwr.state.az.iis/abotit/
address.html
ARKANSAS
Department of Pollution Control and
Ecology
P.O. Box 8913
Little Rock, AR 72219-8913
Phone: 501 682-0744
CALIFORNIA
State Water Resources Control Board
Division of Water Quality
Attention: Storm Water Permit Unit
P.O. Box 1977
Sacramento, CA 95812-1977
Phone: 916 657-0919
Fax:916657-1011
Internet: www.swicb.ca.gov/stormJitm.
COLORADO
Colorado Dept. of Public Health &
Environment
Water Quality Control Division
4300 Cherry Creek Drive South
Denver, CO 80222-1530
Phone: 303 692-3500
CONNECTICUT
Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Water Management
79 Elm Street
Hartford, CT 06106-5127
Phone: 860 424-3850
Internet: dep.state.ct.us/Watei/stiategc.ritni
DELAWARE
Dept. of Natural Resources and Envir.
Control
Division of Water Resources
Surface Water Discharges Section
89 Kings Highway
Dover, DE 19901
Phone: 302-739-5731
Internet: www.dffleastate.de.us/twater.htm
FLORIDA
No state authority. Contact EPA Region 4:
U.S. EPA Region 4
Surface Water Permits and Facilities Branch
Water Management Division
61 Forsyth Street, SURFACE WATER.
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3104
Phone: 404 562-9280
Fax: 404 562-8692
GEORGIA
Department of Natural Resources
Environmental Protection Division
Nonpoint Source Program
Floyd Tower East, Suite 1070
205 Butler Street, SE.
Atlanta, GA 30334
Phone:404656-4887
Internet: www.georgianet.org/dni/
A64
-------
Protecting Surface Water —Appendices
Appendix II: State Storm-water Offices (cont.)
HAWAH
Department of Health
Clean Water Branch
Engineering Section
919 Ala Moana Boulevard, Room 301
Honolulu, HI 96814-4920
Phone: 808 586-4309
IDAHO
No state authority. Contact EPA Region 10:
U.S. EPA Region 10
Office of Water
NPDES Permits Unit
1200 Sixth Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101
Phone: 206 553-1448
ILLINOIS
Illinois Department of Natural Resources
Office of Water Resources
524 South Second. Street
Springfield, IL 62701-1787
Phone: 217 782-3863
Internet: dnr.state.il.Tis/ildnr/ofrlces/
water.htm
INDIANA
Department Of Environmental Management
NPDES Permits Group
105 South Meridian Street
Indianapolis, IN 46206
Phone:317232-8603
IOWA
Storm Water Permit Coordinator
Iowa Department of Natural Resources
Wallace State Office Building
900 East Grand Avenue
Des Moines, IA 50319
Phone: 515 281-7017
KANSAS
Kansas Department of Health and
Environment
Bureau of Water
Building 283—Forbes Field
Topeka, KS 66620
Phone: 785 296-5557
Internet: www.state.ks.us/public/kdhe/
bow.fa.tml
KENTUCKY
Kentucky Dept. for Environmental
Protection
Division of Water
KPDES Branch
14 Reilly Road
Frankfort, KY 40601
Phone: 502 564-3410
Internet: www.state.kyvus/'agencies/
nrepc/dow/dwkpdes.httn
LOUISIANA
Department of Environmental Quality
Office of Water Resources
P.O. Box 82215
Baton Rouge, LA 70884-2215
Phone: 504 765-0525
MAINE
Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Land and Water Quality
Water Resource Regulation Division
17 State House Station
Augusta, ME 04333-0017
Phone:207287-3901
Internet: www.state.me.tis/dep/whoswho.htm
A6-5
-------
Protecting Surface Water —Appendices
Appendix II: State Storm-water Offices (cont.)
MARYLAND
Maryland Department of the Environment
Water Management Administration
Nonpoint Source Permits Program
2500 Broenig Highway
Baltimore, MD 21224
Phone: 410 631-3566
Internet: www.mde.state.md.us/cuirent/
regcaLhtmi
MASSACHUSETTS
Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Resource Protection
Division of Water Supply
One Winter Street, Ninth Floor
Boston, MA 02108-4747
Phone:617556-1143
MICHIGAN
Michigan Dept. Of Environmental Quality
Surface Water Quality Division
Permits Program
P.O. Box 30273
Lansing, MI 48909
Phone:517373-1982
MINNESOTA
Department of Natural Resources
Division of Waters
Water Quality Division
520 Lafayette Road North
St. Paul, MN 55155
Phone: 612-296-8280
MISSISSIPPI
Department of Environmental Quality
Office of Land and Water Resources
2380 Highway 80 West
Jackson, MI 39204
Phone: 601 961-5234
MISSOURI
Department of Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Quality
Water Pollution Control Program
P.O. Box 176
Jefferson City, MO 65102
Phone: 573 526-2928
MONTANA
Department of Environmental Quality
Permitting and Compliance Division
P.O. Box 200901
Helena, MT 59620
Phone: 406 444-5329
NEBRASKA
Department of Environmental Quality
1200 N Street, Suite 400
Lincoln, NE 68509
Phone: 402 471-2023
NEVADA
Dept. of Conservation and Natural
Resources
Environmental Protection Division
333 West Nye Lane, Room 129
Carson City, NV 89706-0851
Phone: 702 687-4670, Ext. 3149
NEW HAMPSHIRE
Department of Environmental Services
Water Division
64 North Main Street, Third Floor
Concord, NH 03301
Phone: 603 271-2457
NEW JERSEY
Department of Environmental Protection
Division of Water Quality
401 East State Street, Third Floor
P.O. Box 029
Trenton, NJ 08625
Phone: 609 633-7021
A6-6
-------
Protecting Surface Water —Appendices
Appendix II: State Storm-water Offices (cont.)
NEW MEXICO
New Mexico Environment Department
Surface Water Quality Division
P.O. Box 26110
Santa Fe, NM 87502
Phone: 505 827-2827
NEW YORK
Department of Environmental
Conservation
Division of Water
50 Wolf Road, Room 314
Albany, NY 12233-3505
Phone:518457-0624
Internet: www.dec.state.ny.us/website/
pollutionAvater.html
NORTH CAROLINA
Dept. of Environment and Natural
Resources
Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Phone: 919 733-5083, ext. 525
NORTH DAKOTA
Department of Health
Environmental Engineering Division
James Collins
1200 Missouri Avenue, Room 203
Bismarck, ND 58506-5520
Phone: 701 328-5210
OHIO
Ohio EPA
Division of Surface Water
Storm water Section
P.O. Box 1049
Columbus, OH 43216-1049
Phone:614644-2034
OKLAHOMA
Oklahoma Dept. of Environmental Quality
Water Quality Program
1000 N.E. 10th St., WQS 0207
Oklahoma City, OK 73117-1212
Phone: 405-271-7339
OREGON
Storm Water Coordinator
Department of Environmental Quality
Water Quality Division
811 SURFACE WATER. Sixth Avenue
Portland, OR 97204
Phone:800452-4011
PENNSYLVANIA
Department of Environmental Protection
Bureau of Water Quality Protection
Division of Wastewater Management
RCSOB, Eleventh Floor
P.O. Box 8774
Harrisburg, PA 17105-8774
Phone: 717 787-8184
RHODE ISLAND
Department of Environmental Management
Water Resources - Permitting
235 Promenade Street
Providence, RI 02908
Phone: 401 277-6820 ext. 7710
Fax: 401 277-6177
SOUTH CAROLINA
Department of Health and Environmental
Control
Industry and Agriculture
Waste Water Division
2600 Bull Street
Columbia, SC 29201
Phone: 803 734-9250
A6-7
-------
Protecting Surface Water —Appendices
Appendix II: State Storm-water Offices (cont.)
SOUTH DAKOTA
Dept. of Environment and Natural
Resources
Surface Water Quality
523 East Capital
Pierre, SD 57501-3181
Phone: 800 SD-STORM (737-8676)
TENNESSEE
Department of Environment and
Conservation
Division of Water Pollution Control
401 Church Street, Sixth Floor
Nashville, TN 37243
Phone: 615 532-0669
TEXAS
Texas Natural Resources Conservation
Commission
Water Resource Management
Water Quality Division, Permits
Department (MC 150)
P.O. Box 13087
Austin, TX 78711-3087
Phone: 512 239-4433
UTAH
Utah Department of Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
1594 West North Temple
P.O. Box 146201
Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-6201
Phone: 801 538-7230
Internet: www.nr.state.utus/wtrresc/
wtrresc.htm
VERMONT
Chief, Storm Water Section
Department of Environmental
Conservation
103 South Main Street, Sewing Building
Waterbury, VT 05671-0405
Phone: 802 244-3822
VIRGINIA
Division of Environmental Quality
State Water Control Board
Permits Section
629 East Main Street
Richmond, VA 23219
Phone: 804 698-4086
WASHINGTON
Department of Ecology-
Water Quality Division
P.O. Box 47600
Olympia, WA 98594-7600
Phone: 360 407-6000
WEST VIRGINIA
Division of Environmental Protection
Office of Water Resources
1201 Greenbriar Street
Charleston, WV 25311
Phone: 304 558-0375
WISCONSIN
Department of Natural Resources
Bureau of Watershed Management
P.O. Box 7921
Madison, WI 53707
Phone: 608 267-8525
WYOMING
Department of Environmental Quality
122 West 25th Street
Cheyenne, WY 82002
Phone: 307 777-7570
A6-8
-------
Protecting Surface Water —Appendices
Appendix III: NPDES Fact Sheet and FAQ
NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PROGRAM
The Clean Water Act requires that all discharges from any point source into waters of the
United States must obtain an NPDES permit. By point sources, EPA means discrete con-
veyances such as pipes or man made ditches. This does not necessarily mean that a household
must obtain a permit to connect to a city sewer, but the facilities where discharges go directly
into surface waters must obtain a permit. The reason for obtaining a permit is to protect public
health and the nation's waters. The discharges that pose the most threat to public health and
the nation's waters are: human wastes, ground-up food from sink disposals, laundry and bath
waters, toxic chemicals and metals. Also, fecal corifbrm, oil and grease, pesticides, and metals
are types of pollutants that when discharged into the nation's waters threaten both the health
of humans and life forms in the water. If left untreated, the nation would be unable to enjoy its
largest natural resource, water. Permitting, while it is regulatory, ensures that the nation's
waters will be ever-improving and safe today as well as tomorrow.
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Permit Program
The Clean "Water Act requires wastewater dischargers to have a permit establishing pollution
limits, and specifying monitoring and reporting requirements. National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permits regulate household and industrial wastes that are collect-
ed in sewers and treated at municipal wastewater treatment plants. Permits also regulate indus-
trial point sources and concentrated animal feeding operations that discharge into other waste-
water collection systems, or that discharge directly into receiving waters. More than 200,000
sources are regulated by NPDES permits nationwide.
Permits regulate discharges with the goals of 1) protecting public health and aquatic life, and
2) assuring that every facility treats wastewater. To achieve these ends, permits include the fol-
lowing terms and conditions:
Site-specific discharge (or effluent) limits;
Standard and site-specific compliance monitoring and reporting requirements; and
when and if regulated facilities fail to comply with the provisions of their permits, they may be
subject to enforcement actions. EPA uses a variety of techniques to monitor permittees' compli-
ance status, including on-site inspections and review of data submitted by permittees.
TYPES OF REGULATED POLLUTANTS
CONVENTIONAL POLLUTANTS are contained in the sanitary wastes of households, business-
es, and industries. These pollutants include human wastes, ground-up food from sink dispos-
als, and laundry and bath waters. Conventional pollutants include:
Fecal Coliform - These bacteria are found in the digestive tracts of humans and animals; their
presence in water indicates the potential presence of pathogenic organisms.
Oil and Grease - These organic substances may include hydrocarbons, fats, oils, waxes, and
A6-9
-------
Protecting Surface Water —Appendices
Appendix III: NPDES Fact Sheet and FAQ (cont.)
high-molecular fatty acids. Oil and grease may produce sludge solids that are difficult to
process.
TOXIC POLLUTANTS are particularly harmful to animal or plant life. They are primarily
grouped into organics (including pesticides, solvents, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and
dioxins) and metals (including lead, silver, mercury, copper, chromium, zinc, nickel, and cad-
mium).
NONCONVENTIONAL POLLUTANTS are any additional substances that are not conventional
or toxic that may require regulation. These include nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus.
NPDES Watershed Strategy
A NPDES Watershed Strategy has been developed to ensure that the NPDES Program protects
watersheds as effectively as possible.
OWM developed the NPDES Watershed Strategy with input from States and EPA Regions. The
final strategy reflects a first step towards the Office of Water's goal of fully integrating the
NPDES permitting program into the Agency's broader Water Protection Approach.
The Watershed Strategy identifies six areas that must be addressed to improve water quality on
a watershed basis nationwide, including:
Statewide coordination: Support the development of State-wide basin management
frameworks, and coordinate interstate basin efforts to facilitate implementation of the
Watershed Protection Approach.
NPDES Permits: Streamline the process for NPDES permit development, issuance, and
review, and develop innovative approaches to permitting on a watershed basis where
feasible.
Monitoring and assessment: Develop a state-wide monitoring strategy, and establish
point-source ambient monitoring requirements.
Programmatic measures and environmental indicators: Revise existing national
accountability measures to facilitate implementation of the Watershed Protection
Approach.
Public participation: Utilize existing NPDES public participation process in develop-
ment of watershed protection plans, and seek broad public participation in identifying
local environmental goals.
Enforcement: Include emphasis on facilities that discharge to priority basins.
A6-10
-------
Protecting Surface Water —Appendices
Appendix III: NPDES Fact Sheet and FAQ (cont.)
Implementation of the Watershed Strategy is now underway, and will include the completion
of assessments of each State's watershed protection activities and needs. OWM will coordinate
with other EPA Offices and States to ensure that ongoing program activities take watershed
planning into consideration.
Wet Weather
Chief among the NPDES Program's responsibilities is the effective implementation of EPA's
wet-weather strategies, including storm water management and the control of combined sewer
and sanitary sewer overflows.
NPDES Storm Water Program.
Storm water discharges from many sources are largely uncontrolled. For this reason, the man-
date of the Storm Water Program is particularly challenging.
Amendments to the Clean Water Act established a two-phased approach to addressing storm
water discharges. Phase I, currently being implemented, requires permits for separate storm
water systems serving large- and medium-sized communities (those with over 100,000 inhabi-
tants), and for storm water discharges associated with industrial and construction activity
involving at least five acres.
To address the large number of industrial dischargers of storm water—at over 100,000 facilities-
-EPA has developed a strategy with a tiered framework to control the administrative burden
while emphasizing reduction in risk to human health and ecosystems.
Phase II, which is currently under development, will address remaining storm water dis-
charges. Ultimately, millions of potential permittees will be covered, including urban areas with
populations under 100,000, smaller construction sites, and retail, commercial, and residential
activities.
NPDES Program: Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs)
In April 1994, EPA issued a policy for the control of combined sewer overflows. The policy calls
for communities with CSOs to take immediate and long-term actions to address these overflow
problems. Measures specified in the policy include proper operation and regular maintenance of
sewer systems and CSOs, as well as the public notice in the event of overflows, to ensure that the
public receives adequate notification of the impact of this health and environmental hazard.
Despite its rigorous approach to controlling combined sewer overflows, the CSO Control Policy
provides communities with the flexibility to develop a workable, cost-effective solution to a
major environmental problem. With significant input from key stakeholders, OWM is currently
developing guidances to assist communities to implement measures for the control of CSOs as
effectively as possible.
A6-11
-------
Protecting Surface Water —Appendices
Appendix III: NPDES Fact Sheet and FAQ (cont.)
NPDES Program;
EPA is currently in the process of evaluating the extent of sanitary sewer overflows across the
country. The Agency will work with the public and with constituent groups across the country
to identify and evaluate issues associated with these overflows to protect human health, proper-
ty, and water quality.
NPDES Permit Program - Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who needs a NPDES Permit?
Any person discharging pollutants from a point source (direct industrial discharge or municipal
wastewater) into the waters of the United States. The permit will probably contain limits on
what you can discharge, monitoring and reporting requirements, and other provisions to
ensure that the discharge does not hurt water quality.
2. Where do I apply for a NPDES permit?
In most States, the State environmental protection office issues NPDES permits. A few States
haven't yet received EPA approval to issue NPDES permits, and in those States you get a permit
from an EPA regional office. You may also need to get a State permit from these States.
Here is who you should contact:
EPA Headquarters: NPDES Branch - (202) 260-9541
EPA Regions
State Contacts
The States that do not have permits are:
Alaska (contact EPA Region X)
Arizona (contact Region IX)
Idaho (contact Region X)
Maine (contact Region I)
Massachusetts (contact Region I)
New Hampshire (contact Region I)
New Mexico (contact Region VI)
Texas (contact Region VI)
District of Columbia (contact Region III)
Puerto Rico (contact Region II)
Pacific Territories (contact EPA Region IX)
Federal Indian Reservations (contact the EPA Regional Office where the Tribe is located)
A6-12
-------
Protecting Surface Water —Appendices
Appendix 111: NPDES Fact Sheet and FAQ (cont.)
3. Which States have EPA's approval to issue NPDES permits?
4. Is it legal to have wastewater coming out of a pipe into my local receiving water
(eg.lake,stream,river,wetland)?
As long as the wastewater being discharged is covered by and in compliance with an NPDES.
permit, there are enough controls in place to make sure the discharge is safe and that humans
and aquatic life are being protected. To find out if a discharge is covered by an NPDES permit,
call the EPA Regional office or the State office responsible for issuing NPDES permits.
5. How do NPDES permits protect water?
An NPDES permit will generally specify an acceptable level of a pollutant or pollutant parame-
ter in a discharge (for example, a certain level of bacteria). The permittee may choose which
technologies to use to achieve that level. Some permits, however, do contain certain generic
'best management practices' (such as installing a screen over the pipe to keep debris out of the
waterway). Make sure that the States mandatory standards for dean water and the federal mini-
mums are being met.
6. Is there any information available to me on permits in my area?
Yes, there is a national system that provides certain permitting information called the Permits
Compliance System (PCS).
A6-13
-------
Protecting Surface Water —Appendices
Appendix IV: Western U.S. Precipitation Frequency Maps
A6-14
-------
Protecting Surface Water —Appendices
Appendix IV: Western U.S. Precipitation Frequency Maps
A6-15
-------
Protecting Surface Water —Appendices
Appendix IV: Western U.S. Precipitation Frequency Maps
A6-16
-------
Protecting Surface Water —Appendices
Appendix IV: Western U.S. Precipitation Frequency Maps
A6-17
-------
Protecting Surface Water —Appendices
Appendix IV: Western U.S. Precipitation Frequency Maps
A6-18
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Appendices
Appendix IV: Western U.S. Precipitation Frequency Maps
A6-19
-------
Protecting Surface Water —Appendices
Appendix IV: Western U.S. Precipitation Frequency Maps
A6-20
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Appendices
Appendix IV: Western U.S. Precipitation Frequency Maps
m^^i^^f^^^fs^^f^^^^s'^^is^^rjiifi^ess^i'f
A6-21
-------
Protecting Surface Water —-Appendices
Appendix IV: Western U.S. Precipitation Frequency Maps
ISOPUUWAtS- OF 2S-YB Z4*SPREiIIPITATKJN
IN TENTHS OF AH INCH
A6-22
-------
Protecting Surface Water—Appendices
Appendix IV: Publications, Online Resources, and Software
x^m^^tmz^^
A6-23
-------
Protecting Surface Water —Appendices
Appendix IV: Western U.S. Precipitation Frequency Maps
Eicw.2s t '-"; ' '''•'• T •
BWLLVJtS 4* 25-YR 2**R PSEC1PITSTKW
WTtHIKSOfSWOTCM
A6-24
-------
Protecting Surface Water —Appendices
Appendix IV: Western U.S. Precipitation Frequency Maps
A6-25
-------
-------
ASSESSING RISKS
APPENDICES
-------
Guide for Industrial Waste Management
Groundwater Pathway
Leachate Concentration Threshold Value (LCTV) Tables
Note: These modeling results are in draft form and are not intended to be used in current waste
management decision-making. All aspects of the model are undergoing peer review and public
comment, including: 1) the appropriateness of the Tier 2 model for a location-adjusted analysis;
2) input values for sensitive parameters and liner scenarios; 3) capabilities and user-friendliness
of the model software. We strongly encourage users to review the chapter titled Protecting
Ground-water, Section 1: Characterizing Risk in the EPA s Guide for Industrial Waste
Management for a description of the model and a discussion of key parameters and some
critical issues that affect modeling results.
Explanation of Values in the LCTV Tables
The LCTV is the maximum acceptable concentration in a waste leachate and is based on a toxicity
reference level (TRL) (also called a human health benchmark) such as a Maximum Contaminant
Level (MCL) or a Health-Based Number (HBN). The LCTV is calculated as follows:
LCTV = MCL (or HBN) x DAF.
The DAF (Dilution-Attenuation Factor) reflects the extent to which the waste constituent
concentration is reduced between the waste management unit (WMU) and a ground-water
monitoring well. The reduction in concentration that occurs in the subsurface after the leachate
exits from the base of the unit can be caused by many processes, including dilution, dispersion,
sorption, chemical decay, and biological decay. The DAF is determined with the EPA's
Composite Model for Leachate Migration with Transformation Products (EPACMTP) (version
1.2).
Computing DAFs for all of the organic chemicals would require a large number of simulations to
individually evaluate each of the combinations of retardation coefficient (R) and first-order decay
rate (X). Therefore, rather than performing EPACMTP simulations for all combinations of R and
A,, the DAFs for organics were produced using a time-saving linear interpolation scheme which
was based on a series of EPACMTP model runs using a range of R and A, values. This
interpolation scheme was tested and verified against actual EPACMTP simulations.
The LCTVs for metals were produced by individually modeling each metal. The following metals
are modeled with a non-linear adsorption isotherm generated with the MINTEQA2 geochemical
model: barium, beryllium, cadmium, chromium (in), copper, lead, nickel, silver, and vanadium.
Because of the non-linear nature of the adsorption isotherms for these metals, the DAF is a
function of the leachate concentration and is not listed here. The following metals are modeled
with a linear adsorption isotherm (an empirical relationship that predicts Kd as a function of pH)
developed by Loux et al. (1990): antimony, arsenic, chromium (VI), mercury, selenium, and
thallium. Mercury is modeled with a linearized version of the adsorption isotherm generated with
the MINTEQA2 geochemical model. For more information about metals modeling with
-------
LCTV Notes: Page 2
EPACMTP, please see the EPACMTP Background Document for Metals, U.S. EPA, Office of
Solid Waste, 1996.
How to Use the LCTV Tables
The LCTVs are presented in these tables for three different liner scenarios: the no liner, single
liner, and composite liner (the land application unit scenario considers only the no-liner case). To
use these tables:
• You first need to determine (in conjunction with your state regulatory agency) if the
LCTV for each waste constituent of concern should be based on that constituent's MCL
or HBN value.
• Then for each waste constituent, compare the expected leachate concentration to the three
LCTVs.
• If the leachate concentration is less than the no liner LCTV, then no liner is needed to be
protective of ground water.
• If the leachate concentration is greater than the no liner LCTV but less than the single liner
LCTV, then a single liner is needed to be protective of ground water.
• If the leachate concentration is greater than the single liner LCTV but less than the
composite liner LCTV, then a composite liner is needed to be protective of ground water.
• If any expected leachate concentrations exceed the maximum concentrations
recommended for a composite liner system, consider pollution prevention, treatment, and
more protective liner designs, as well as consultation among regulators, the public and
industry to ensure that such wastes are protectively managed.
We invite you to provide us with any such examples where the expected leachate concentrations
exceed the composite liner LCTV, so that we can ensure that the final guidance is designed to
provide protective recommendations to accommodate all realistic waste management scenarios.
-------
LCTV Notes: Page 3
Exceptions to the LCTV Calculations
Usually, the LCTV reported in the table for a constituent is calculated by multiplying the reported
DAF times the appropriate constituent-specific health benchmark. However, for some
constituents, the DAFs obtained from the modeling are not used to calculate the LCTVs because
several types of upper concentration limits, or caps, are placed on the LCTV. The LCTV may be
capped at a lower value due to: 1) the TC Rule Exit Level, 2) degradation to a toxic daughter
product, or 3) an overall cap of 1,000 mg/L.
• Toxicity Characteristic (TC) Rule For any constituent covered by the TC rule, the
LCTV is capped at the TC Rule Exit Level. The TC Rule exit level concentration (in
mg/L) is given in the "Common Name" column as (TC = x).
• Toxic Daughter Products: For any constituent that degrades to form a toxic daughter
product, the LCTV of the parent constituent has been capped at the LCTV of the toxic
daughter product. If the daughter constituent has an MCL but the parent constituent does
not, the MCL of the daughter product was used in calculating that LCTV. For
constituents with toxic daughter products, the daughter product is noted in parenthesis in
the "Common Name" column.
• LCTV Maximum Value The maximum LCTV is 1,000 mg/L because contaminant
leachate concentrations for these units are not expected to exceed 1,000 mg/L.
Additionally, the waste could potentially be classified as hazardous at this concentration.
However, we invite you to comment on the use of the 1,000 mg/L cap and whether it
accommodates all realistic waste management scenarios.
For these three cases, you can't use the DAF presented in the table to calculate the reported
LCTV. However, all DAFs computed for each organic waste constituent are provided in the
table, regardless of the method by which the LCTV is determined. For example, for constituents
that hydrolyze to produce a toxic daughter product, the DAF of the parent constituent is
presented in the table, even if the LCTV has been set to that of the toxic daughter constituent.
In cases where the concentration of the constituent at the well was exceedingly low (approaching
zero), no DAF is given. Instead, it is denoted in the tables with an asterisk. The LCTV is then
assigned on the basis of the criteria given above: the TC Rule level, the LCTV for the daughter
product, or the 1000 mg/L maximum. The criteria are denoted on the tables as follows:
D - LCTV capped at daughter chemical LCTV;
L - LCTV capped at 1000 mg/L;
T - LCTV capped at TC Rule level.
-------
LCTV Notes: Page 4
Data Sources
Source for R and A, values: EPACMTP Background Document for Finite Source Methodology,
US EPA, Office of Solid Waste, 1996. The R and A, values for all constituents listed in the LCTV
tables come from this source, with the following exceptions: 1) Beta-HCH is assumed to have a
A, value of 0.0 due to the lack of reliable data; and 2) Ethylene thiourea and Phenyl mercuric
acetate are assumed to have an R value of 1.0 and a A, value of 0.0 due to the lack of reliable data.
Source for HBNs: Hazardous Waste Identification Rule (HWIR) Background Document for
Groundwater Pathway Results, US EPA, Office of Solid Waste, August, 1995 (document
contained in Docket # F-95-WHWP-FFFFF). The HBN represents the maximum allowable
concentration in drinking water, given a defined carcinogenic risk or noncarcinogenic hazard
quotient, and is calculated by the Equations 1 and 2, below:
For carcinogens:
R • BW • AT • 365
CR • ED • EF - CSF
(1)
oral
where
Cfa = maximum allowable aqueous water concentration in drinking water (mg/L)
R = risk for individual chemical (1 x 10"6 [unitless])
BW = body weight (70 kilograms)
AT = averaging time (70 years)
CR = water consumption rate (2.0 L/day)
ED = exposure duration (30 years)
EF = exposure frequency (350 day/yr)
CSForal = chemical-specific oral cancer slope factor (mg/kg/day)"1
-------
For noncarcinogens:
LCTV Notes: Page 5
THQ • R/D, • BW • AT • 365
day
yr
(2)
CR • EF • ED
where
Cfa = maximum allowable aqueous water concentration in drinking water (mg/L)
THQ = target hazard quotient (1.0 [unitless])
RfDorat = chemical-specific oral reference dose (mg/kg/day)
BW = body weight (70 kilograms)
AT = averaging time (30 years)
CR = water consumption rate (2.0 L/day)
EF = exposure frequency (350 day/yr)
ED = exposure duration (30 years)
Source for MCLs: Drinking Water Regulations and Health Advisories, US EPA, Office of
Water, October, 1996 (EPA 822-B-96-002). National Primary Drinking Water Regulations are
also available at the following web site: http://www.epa.gov/OGWDW/wot/appa.html
Abbreviations and Symbols
LCTV = Leachate Concentration Threshold Value (LCTV = MCL (or HBN) x DAF)
CAS# = Chemical Abstract Service Registry Number
C? = Is the constituent a carcinogen?
C = Carcinogen
NC = Non-carcinogen
R = Retardation Factor (Retardation is the degree to which a waste constituent moves more
slowly through the aquifer than the groundwater in which it is transported. Retardation results
from sorption processes by which a solute clings to a solid surface.)
A. = First Order Decay Rate (Decay processes include chemical hydrolysis and biodegradation.
However, in the modeling for these Tier 1 LCTV tables only chemical hydrolysis is considered,
since biodegradation rates can vary widely from one site to another. Chemical hydrolysis is the
breaking down of molecules by the addition of water. The products of hydrolysis consist of less
complex molecules and usually include an alcohol or carboxylic acid.)
NA = Not Applicable
HBN = Health-Based Number
MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level
D = LCTV Capped at daughter chemical LCTV
L = LCTV Capped at 1000 mg/L
T = LCTV capped at TC Rule level.
-------
LCTV Notes: Page 6
Modeling Assumptions
• Well location = 150 m down gradient on plume centerline
• All EPACMTP input parameters that are not specified here are set to the default value or
distribution described in Technical Background Document: Industrial Waste Management
Evaluation Model (IWEM), Ground Water Model to Support the Guide for Industrial
Waste Management, US EPA, Office of Solid Waste, 1998 and EPA s Composite Model
for Leachate Migration with Transformation Products (EPACMTP): User s Guide , US
EPA, Office of Solid Waste, 1997.
Landfill
• Infiltration Rates
No Liner = Regional, site-based Monte Carlo distribution (from HELP modeling
based on OSW Survey data) (min = 1.0 x 10'5 m/yr, median =0.13 m/yr, max =1.08
m/yr)
Single Liner = Regional, site-based Monte Carlo distribution from HELP modeling
of 25 representative climate stations (min = 1.0 x 10"5 m/yr, median =0.043 m/yr,
max = 0.053 m/yr)
Composite Liner = 3.4 x 10"5 m/yr
• Waste fraction =1.0
• For the landfill scenario, a retardation coefficient of 1 was used in the interpolation of
DAFs for all organics because the long source duration for the landfill scenario produces
steady-state conditions. Thus, higher retardation coefficients delay the time at which the
peak concentration arrives at the well, but do not change the magnitude of the peak well
concentration.
Surface Impoundment
• Infiltration Assumptions:
No Liner/In-Situ Soil: 2 foot thick native soil/sludge layer with a range of hydraulic
conductivity values from 1 x 10"7 to 1 x 10"5 cm/sec
Single Liner: 3 foot thick clay liner with a hydraulic conductivity of 1 x 10"7 cm/sec
Composite Liner: 3 foot thick clay liner under a 40 mil HDPE FML geomembrane
• Infiltration Rates (derived by EPACMTP based on impoundment characteristics, including
ponding depth which is based on OSW Survey data):
No Liner = Regional, site-based Monte Carlo distribution (min = 1.83 x 10"2 m/yr,
median = 3.94 m/yr, max = 89.6 m/yr)
Single Liner = Regional, site-based Monte Carlo distribution (min = 6.8 x 10"3 m/yr,
median =0.13 m/yr, max = 1.46 m/yr)
Composite Liner = 3.1 x 10"4 m/yr
-------
LCTVNotes: Page?
Waste Pile
• Infiltration Rates
No Liner = Regional, site-based Monte Carlo distribution (from HELP modeling
based on OSW Survey data) (min = 2.54 x 10'5 m/yr, median =0.265 m/yr, max =
1.21 m/yr)
Single Liner = Regional, site-based Monte Carlo distribution from HELP modeling
of 25 representative climate stations (min = 1.0 x 10'5 m/yr, median =0.126 m/yr,
max = 0.135 m/yr)
Composite Liner = 3.4 x 10"5 m/yr
-------
LCTV Notes: Page 8
Land Application Unit
The methodology for the modeling of land application units assumes that:
• 6" of sludge is applied per year over the 40-year lifetime of the facility;
• 80% of the sludge is water; and
• half of this water infiltrates to the subsurface.
Therefore, the effective infiltration rate for land application units is the regional infiltration
rate (in m/yr) plus 0.4 (half of 80%) times the yearly application rate of sludge (in m/yr). This
infiltration rate is used over the entire 10,000 year modeling period. The bulk density of the
sludge is assumed to be 2.65 g/cm3 and the fraction organic carbon of the sludge is
assumed to be 0.3 (Technical Support Document for the Hazardous Waste Identification
Rule: Risk Assessment for Human and Ecological Receptors, U.S. EPA, Office of Solid
Waste, August, 1995). This methodology is explained more fully in the Technical Support
Document for the Industrial Solid Waste Guidance Groundwater Modeling.
• Infiltration Rate:
No Liner: min = 0.061 m/yr, median = 0.182 m/yr, max = 0.806 m/yr
-------
LF LOW Tables Panel
Draft LCTVs for Landfills
Acenaphthene
Acetone (2-propanone)
Acrolein
Acrylamide
Acrylonilrile (degrades to Acrylamide)
\ldrin
Aniline (bcnzeneamine)
ienz[a]anlhracene
Benzene (TC = 0.5)
Benzidine
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo[b]fluoronthene
Benzyl alcohol
icnzyl chloride (degrades to Benzyl
alcohol)
5is(2-chloroelhyl)ether (degrades to 1,4-
Dioxane)
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl]elher
Bis(2-elhylhexyl)phthalate
Bromodichtoromethane
Bromomelhane (degrades to Methanol)
Butanol
Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol,2-sec-(Dinoseb)
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Carbon disulfide
Carbon telrachloride (TC = 0.5)
Chlordane(TC = 0.03)
Chloro- 1 ,3-butadiene 2-(Chloroprene)
Chloroaniline p-
Chlorobenzene (TC = 100)
Chlorobenzilate
Chlorodibromomethane
Chlorofonn (TC = 6.0)
Chloromethane
Chlorophenol 2-
Chloropropene, 3- (Allyl Chloride)
Chrysene
Cresolm-(TC = 200)
Cresol o- (TC = 200)
Cresolp-(TC = 200)
Cumene
ODD
DDE
DDT, p,p'- (degrades to DDE)
Di-n-butyl phthalate
83329
67641
75058
98862
I0702J
79061
107131
309002
62532
5655;
71432
92875
5032f
20599!
100516
100447
111444
39638325
imr,
7527'
7483<
7136:
8885'
8568'
75151
56235
5774!
12699!
10647!
10890'
510156
12448
6766!
7487!
95571
10705
21801'
10839'
9548'
106445
9882
7254
7255
5029:
8474
C?
N<:
NC
NC
NC
NC
r.
c
r
r
c
c
c
r
NC
NC
c
C
C
C
C
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
C
NC
NC
NC
c
c
c
c
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
c
c
NC
16.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
4025
1.0
583
1.2
1.0
1678
1678
1.0
2.8
1.0
1.7
35864
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.3
46.1
1.2
1.7
2065
1.1
1.1
2.0
30.2
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.2
1.0
583
1.2
1.2
1.2
7.7
2065
11606
10344
63.3
X
.JyiJU
0.00
0.00
8.23E-07
0.00
1.9E+08
0.0052
0.00012
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
119
0.067
0.00
7.15E-10
0.00079
2.7
0.00
0.00
4.76E-05
0.00049
0.0049
3.34E-10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0017
0.00038
7.46E-05
0.00
0.00
12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0073
0.00
0.017
3.47E-05
MCL
0.0050
2.0E-04
0.0060
0.080
0.0070
0.0050
0.0020
0.10
0.080
0.080
1IBN
4.0
0.20
4.0
0.70
2.0E-05
2.0E-04
5.0E-06
0.010
7.7E-05
0.0030
4.0E-07
l.OE-05
7.1E-05
10
5.0E-04
8.0E-05
0.0010
0.0060
0.0014
0.050
4.0
0.040
7.0
4.0
7.0E-04
7.0E-05
0.70
0.10
0.70
3.0E-04
0.0010
0.010
6.6E-03
0.20
1.75
0.0027
2.0
2.0
0.20
1.0
4.0E-04
3.0E-04
3.0E-04
4.0
DAF
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
*L
2.9
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
*D
7.2
2.2
2.2
2.3
1.7E+06
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.6
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.3
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
*L
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.9
2.2
3.6
2.2
LCTV
butdonMCL
fme/U
0.011
4.4E-04
0.013
0.18
0.015
0.013
0.0044
0.22
0.18
0.18
LCTV
hHsdmllBN
fme/U
8.8
0.44
8.8
1000
5.8E-05
5.8E-05
1. IE-OS
0.022
1.7E-04
0.0066
8.8E-07
2.2E-05
1.6E-04
22
22
5.8E-04
0.0022
0.013
0.0032
44
8.8
0.088
15
8.8
0.0018
1.5E-04
1.5
0.22
1.5
6.9E-04
0.0022
0.022
0.015
0.44
1000
0.0059
4.4
4.4
0.44
2.2
0.0012
6.6E-04
6.6E-04
8.8
DAF
4.6
4.6
4.6
»L
11
4.7
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.6
4.6
*D
140
4.5
4.5
5.1
*D
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.9
7.7
4.5
4.6
4.6
4.6
5.7
4.9
4.6
4.5
4.6
*L
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.6
11
4.5
32
4.6
LCTV
b»!td«nMCL
taEflL)
0.023
9.0E-04
0.027
0.41
0.032
0.039
0.0090
0.46
0.39
0.37
LCTV
biKdenllDN
(rnelL)
18
0.92
18
1000
2.2E-04
2.2E-04
2.3E-05
0.045
3.5E-04
0.014
1.8E-06
4.5E-05
3.3E-04
46
46
0.011
0.0045
0.027
0.0071
92
18
0.18
32
20
0.0054
3.2E-04
3.2
0.46
3.2
0.0017
0.0049
0.046
0.030
0.92
1000
0.012
9.2
9.2
0.92
4.6
0.0044
0.0014
0.0014
18
DAF
4.4E+05
4.5E+05
4.4E+05
*L
*L
4.5E+07
4.1E+05
4.1E+05
4.1E+05
4.IE+05
4.1E+05
4.1E+05
4.4E+05
4.4E+05
*L
*L
4.1E+05
4.1E+05
1.7E+09
*L
4.4E+05
4.4E+05
7.5E+05
9.5E-K18
*T
4.1E+05
4.4E+05
4.4E+05
4.4E+05
*L
6.8E+08
1.1E+06
4.1E+05
4.4E+05
*L
4.4E+05
4.4E+05
4.4E+05
4.4E+05
4.4E+05
*L
4.1E+05
*D
6.7E+05
LCTV
bind
-------
LFLCTV Table: Page 2
Common Name
Di-n-oclyl phthalate
Diallate
Dibenz[a,h]anthracene
Dibromo-3-chloropropane 1 ,2-
Dichlorobcnzenel ,2-
Dichlorobenzenel.4- (TC = 7.5)
Dichlorobenzidine3,3'-
Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)
Dichloroethane 1,1- (degrades to Vinyl
chloride)
Dichlorophenol 2,4-
Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 2,4-(2,4-D)
(TC= 10)
Dichloropropane 1,2-
Dichloropropene 1 ,3-(mixture of isomers)
Dichloropropene cis-1,3-
Dichloropropene trans-1,3-
Dieldrin
Dietliyl phlhalate
Diethylslilbeslrol
Dimethoate (degrades to Methanol)
Dimethoxybenzidine 3,3'-
Dimelhyl phthalate (degrades to
vlelhanol)
Dimethylbenz[a]anthracene 7,12-
Dimethylbenzidine 3,3'-
Dimethylphenol 2,4-
Dinitrobenzene 1,3-
Dinitrophenol 2,4-
Dinitrotoluene 2,4- (TC = 0.13)
Dinitrotoluene 2,6-
Dioxane 1,4-
Diphenylainine
Disulfoton
Endosulfan (Endosulfan I and Il.mixture)
Endrin (TC = 0.02)
Epichlorohydrin
Ethoxyethanol 2-
Ethyl acetate
Ethyl ether
Ethyl methacrylate
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Ethylbenzene
Ethylene dibromide (1,2-Dibromoethane)
Ethylene thiourea
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Formaldehyde
Formic acid
Furan
CAS#
117840
2303164
53703
96128
95501
106467
91941
7571!
75343
120832
94757
78875
542756
10061015
10061026
60571
84662
56531
60515
11990*
131113
57976
1 19937
105679
9965C
51285
121142
606202
123911
122394
298044
115297
72208
106898
110805
141786
60297
97632
62500
100414
106934
96457
206440
86737
50000
64186
110009
C?
NC
C
C
C
NC
C
C
NC
C
NC
NC
C
C
C
C
C
NC
C
NC
C
NC
NC
C
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
NC
C
C
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
R
105841
40.3
8804
1.2
4.2
4.0
6.6
1.4
1.1
1.8
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.2
321
1.3
33.7
1.0
1.1
1.0
11606
1.9
1.5
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.0
6.3
3.3
10.4
107
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
3.7
1.1
1
114
22.6
1.0
1.0
1.0
X
(yr-D
8.99E-08
0.029
0.00
0.0029
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0033
0.00
0.00
0.013
0.00
12
12
0.018
0.0045
0.00
0.57
0.00
0.032
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.67
0.64
0.016
9.0
0.00
0.063
0.00
0.019
363
0.00
0.18
0.0000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MCL
(mg/L)
2.0E-04
0.60
0.075
0.0050
0.0020
0.70
5.0E-05
HBN
(mg/L)
0.70
0.0010
1.1E-05
6.0E-05
3.0
0.0040
2.0E-04
7.0
9.0E-04
0.10
0.40
0.0010
5.0E-04
5.0E-04
5.0E-04
5.0E-06
30
2.0E-08
0.0070
0.0060
400
3.0E-06
9.0E-06
0.70
0.0040
0.070
0.070
0.040
0.0080
0.90
0.0010
0.20
0.010
0.0090
10
30
7.0
3.0
3.0E-07
4.0
l.OE-06
2.0E-05
1.0
1.0
7.0
70
0.040
No Liner/In-Situ Soil
DAF
2.2
4.3
2.2
2.4
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.5
2.2
2.2
2.9
2.2
*L
*L
3.6
2.5
2.2
310
2.2
4.3
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
710
550
3.6
*L
2.2
6.5
2.2
3.6
*L
2.2
21
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
LCTV
based on MCL
(mg/L)
4.8E-04
1.3
0.17
0.0044
0.015
0.0072
1.5
0.0011
LCTV
based on HBN
(mg/L)
1.5
0.0043
2.4E-05
1.4E-04
6.6
0.0088
4.4E-04
15
8.8E-05
0.22
0.88
0.0029
0.0011
1000
1000
1.8E-05
75
4.4E-08
2.2
0.013
44
6.6E-06
2.0E-05
1.5
0.0088
0.15
0.13
0.088
0.018
2.0
0.71
110
0.020
1000
22
195
15
11
1000
8.8
2.1E-05
4.5E-05
2.2
2.2
15
154
0.088
Single Liner
DAF
4.6
53
4.5
6.5
4.6
4.5
4.5
4.6
6.7
4.6
4.6
11
4.5
*L
*L
32
7.5
4.5
7.0E+05
4.5
53
4.6
4.5
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.5
4.6
2.2E+07
1.3E+07
32
*L
4.6
120
4.6
32
*L
4.6
1300
4.5
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.6
LCTV
based on MCL
(mg/L)
0.0013
2.8
0.34
0.0092
0.055
0.020
3.2
0.065
LCTV
based on HBN
(mg/L)
3.2
0.053
5.0E-05
3.9E-04
14
0.018
9.0E-04
32
1.8E-04
0.46
1.8
0.011
0.0023
1000
1000
1.6E-04
225
9.0E-08
92
0.027
92
1.4E-05
4.1E-05
3.2
0.018
0.32
0.13
0.18
0.036
4.1
1000
1000
0.020
1000
46
1000
32
96
1000
18
0.0013
9.2E-05
4.6
4.6
32
322
0.18
Composite Liner
DAF
4.4E+05
*L
4.1E+05
*L
4.4E+05
4.1E+05
4.1E+05
4.4E+05
*D
4.4E+05
4.4E+05
*L
4.1E+05
*L
*L
*L
*L
4.1E+05
*L
4.1E+05
*L
4.4E+05
4.1E+05
4.4E+05
4.4E+05
4.4E+05
4.4E+05
4.4E+05
4.1E+05
4.4E+05
*L
*L
*T
*L
4.4E+05
*L
4.4E+05
*L
*L
4.4E+05
*L
4.1E+05
4.4E+05
4.4E+05
4.4E+05
4.4E+05
4.4E+05
LCTV
based on MCL
(mg/L)
1000
1000
7.5
0.20
1000
0.020
1000
1000
LCTV
based on HBN
(mg/L)
1000
1000
4.5
1000
1000
7.5
82
1000
0.20
1000
10
1000
205
1000
1000
1000
1000
0.0082
1000
1000
1000
1.3
3.7
1000
1000
1000
0.13
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
0.020
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
8.4
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
4/7/99
This table Is based on a draft model and is for review purposes only.
Lf_gcb.xls
-------
LFLCTVTaiMK
iCH bela-
HCH (Lindane) gamma- (TC = 0.4)
[degrades lo 1.2.4-Trichlorobenzene)
HCH alpha- (degrades to 1,2,4-
rrichlorobcnzene)
Heptachlor(TC = 0.008)
leplachlor epoxide
Hexachloro-1 ,3-buladiene (TC = 0.5)
Hexachlorobenzene (TC = 0. 13)
iexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachloroelhane (TC = 3.0)
Indenofl ,2.3-cdlpyrene
Isobutyl alcohol
Kcpone
Melhacrylonilrile
Methanol
Methyl parathion (degrades to
Methanol)
Methylcholanthrene 3-
Melhylene bromide (Dibromomelhane)
vlethylene Chloride (Dichloromethane)
(degrades to Formaldehyde)
N-Nitroso-di-n-butylamine
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
N-Nilrosodielhylamine
N-Nilrosodimelhylairiine
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
N-Nilrosomelhyletliylainine
N-Nitrosopiperidine
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene (TC = 2.0)
Octamethyl pyrophosphoramide
Parathion (ethyl)
Pentachlorobenzene
Pentachloronitrobenzene (PCNB)
Pentachlorophenol (TC = 100)
Phenol
Phenyl mercuric acetate
Phenylenediamine, 1,3-
Phorate
Polychlorinated biphenyls (Aroclors)
Pronamide
Pyrene
Pyridine (TC = 5.0)
Safrole
Strychnine and sails
Styrene
319857
58899
319846
76448
1024573
87683
118741
77474
67721
70304
193395
78831
78591
14350C
12698'
67561
298000
56495
7495:
75092
92416;
62164:
55185
6275*
86306
10595956
10075'
93055:
9120:
9895:
15216'
5638:
608935
8268!
87865
10895:
6238'
10845:
298021
133636:
23950585
129001
11086
9459'
5724!
100425
('
r
c
r
c
r
r
NC
c
NC
r
NC
c
r
NC
NC
NC
C
NC
C
c
C
C
C
c
c
c
c
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
c
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
NC
NC:
NC
C
NC
NC
R
8.2
7.7
8.2
432
212
77.7
686
141
11.8
267
4839
1.0
1.2
38.6
1.0
1.0
1.8
26587
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.8
1.0
1.0
1.0
4.4
1.1
1.0
4.8
654
100
4.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.2
4119
2.1
222
1.0
1.6
1.2
2.8
X
0.00
0.31
0.31
18
0.018
0.00
0.00
7.2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00012
0.00
0.81
0.00
0.00
0.00029
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.80E-05
0.71
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
18
0.00
2.09E-05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MCL
(ms/L)
2.0E-04
4.0E-04
2.0E-04
0.0010
0.050
0.0050
0.0010
5.0E-04
0.10
HBN
(met)
5.0E-05
7.0E-OS
l.OE-05
2.0E-05
9.0E-06
0.0010
5.0E-05
0.30
0.0060
0.010
2.1E-04
10
0.090
2.0E-06
0.0040
20
0.0090
3.0E-06
0.40
0.010
2.0E-05
l.OE-05
6.0E-07
2.0E-06
0.020
4.0E-06
2.0E-06
4.0E-05
1.0
0.020
0.070
0.20
0.030
3.0E-04
7.0E-04
20
0.0028
0.20
0.0070
l.OE-05
3.0
1.0
0.040
5.0E-04
0.010
7.0
DAF
110
110
»T
3.6
2.2
2.2
*L
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
1500
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
930
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
*L
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
LCTV
tnu
0.32
0.32
0.0080
0.0064
0.0045
1000
0.024
0.0045
0.0023
0.46
LCTV
butdenllBN
(mg/L)
0,40
1.8
0.0080
2.9E-04
0.0045
2.3E-04
1000
0.027
0.046
9.5E-04
46
0.41
9.0E-06
0.019
92
92
1.4E-05
1.8
0.048
9.0E-05
4.5E-05
2.7E-06
9.0E-06
0.090
1.8E-05
9.0E-06
1.8E-04
4.6
0.092
0.33
1000
0.14
0.0014
0.0032
92
0.013
0.92
1000
4.5E-05
14
4.6
0.18
0.0023
0.046
32
DAF
»T
»L
*T
*L
4.1E+05
4.1E+05
*L
4.1E+05
4.4E+05
4.1E+05
4.4E+05
4.1E+05
4.1E+05
4.8E+07
4.4E+05
*L
4.1E+05
4.4E+05
4.7E+08
4.1E+05
4.1E+05
4.1E+05
4.1E+05
4.1E+05
4.1E+05
4.1E+05
4.1E+05
4.4E+05
4.4E+05
l.OE+06
*L
4.4E+05
4.1E+05
4.1E+05
4.4E+05
4.4E+05
4.4E+05
*L
4.1E+05
5.8E+05
4.4E+05
4.4E+05
4.1E+05
4.4E+05
4.4E+05
LCTV
bilfiionMCL
(mg/L)
0.40
1000
0.0080
1000
0.13
1000
1000
100
205
1000
LCTV
biiKjonllBN
-------
LFLCTV Table: Page 4
Common Name
TCDDioxin2,3,7,8-
retrachlorobenzene 1,2,4,5-
relrachloroethane 1 , 1 , 1 ,2- (degrades to
Trichloroethylene)
retrachloroethane 1 , 1 ,2,2- (degrades to
Trichloroethylene)
Tetrachloroethylene (TC = 0.7)
Fetrachlorophenol 2,3,4,6-
retraethyl dithiopyrophosphate (SulfotepJ
Toluene
Toluenediamme 2,4-
Muidine o-
roluidine p-
Toxaphene (chlorinated camphenes)
(TC = 0.5)
rribromomethane (Bromoform)
rrichloro-l,2,2-trifluoro- ethane 1,1,2-
rrichlorobenzene 1,2,4-
rrichloroethane 1,1,1-
Trichloroethane 1,1, 2- (degrades to 1,1-
Dichloroelhylene)
Frichloroethylene (1,1,2-Trichloroethylene)
(TC = 0.5)
rrichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
Trichlorophenol 2,4,5- (TC = 400)
rrichlorophenol 2,4,6- (TC = 2.0)
rris(2,3-dibromopropyl)phosphate
Vinyl chloride (TC = 0.2)
Xylenes (total)
Barium (TC = 100)
Beryllium
Cadmium (TC = 1 .0)
Chromium (HI)
Copper
Lead (TC = 5.0)
Nickel
Silver (TC = 5.0)
Vanadium
Zinc
Antimony
Arsenic (TC = 5.0)
Chromium (VI) (TC = 5.0)
Mercury (TC = 0.2)
Selenium (TC= 1.0)
Thallium
CAS#
1746016
95943
630206
79345
12718'
58902
3689245
108883
95807
9553'
106490
8001352
75252
76131
120821
71556
79005
79016
75694
9595-1
88062
126727
75014
1330207
7440393
7440417
7440439
16065381
7440508
7439921
7440020
7440224
7440622
7440666
7440360
7440382
7440473
7439976
7782492
7440280
C?
c
NC
C
C
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
C
C
C
C
NC
NC
NC
C
C
NC
NC
C
C
NC
NC
NC
C
NC
NC
NC
C
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
NC
NC
NC
NC
R
3348
52.1
2.4
1.3
1.4
1.6
9.6
1.7
1.0
1.0
1.0
55.3
1.3
3.5
25.2
1.4
1.1
1.3
1.3
3.3
1.5
5.1
1.0
4.2
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
\
(yr-D
0.00
0.00
0.0041
0.22
0.00
0.00
24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.020
0.00014
0.00
0.00
0.22
0.00080
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.027
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
MCL
(mg/L)
3.0E-08
0.0050
1.0
0.0030
0.10
0.070
0.20
0.0050
0.0050
0.0020
10
2
0.005
0.1
0.006
0.05
0.1
0.002
0.05
0.002
HBN
(mg/L)
6.0E-10
0.010
0.0030
4.0E-04
0.40
1.0
0.020
7.0
3.0E-05
4.0E-04
4.0E-04
8.0E-05
1000
0.40
0.0010
0.0080
10
4.0
0.0080
9.0E-06
4.0E-05
70
0.0040
40
1.0
0.015
0.20
0.30
10
0.014
5.68E-05
0.175
0.011
0.175
No Liner/In-Situ Soil
DAF
2.2
2.2
2.5
39
2.2
2.2
*L
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
3.6
2.2
2.2
2.2
39
2.3
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
4.3
2.2
2.2
3.5
2.7
2.9
3.7
2.6
4.3
LCTV
based on MCL
(mg/L)
6.6E-08
0.011
0.011
0.011
2.2
0.01 1
0.22
0.15
7.8
0.012
0.011
0.0044
22
4.8
0.019
0.30
0.021
0.14
0.29
0.0075
0.13
0.0087
LCTV
based on HBN
(mg/L)
1.3E-09
0.022
0.0075
0.016
0.70
2.2
1000
15
6.6E-05
8.8E-04
8.8E-04
2.9E-04
1000
0.88
2.2E-04
0.018
22
8.8
0.018
3.9E-05
8.8E-05
154
0.0099
448
2.9
0.6745
0.52
1.2
27
0.048
1.6E-04
0.50
0.041
0.46
Single Liner
DAF
4.5
4.6
7.2
4.0E+04
4.6
4.6
*L
4.6
4.5
4.5
4.5
32
4.7
4.6
4.6
4.0E+04
5.1
4.5
4.6
4.6
4.5
53
4.6
4.6
19
10
9.4
20
6.9
5.5
LCTV
based on MCL
(mg/L)
1.4E-07
0.023
0.023
0.023
4.6
0.096
0.47
0.32
1000
0.026
0.023
0.0092
46
12
0.093
1.0
0.11
0.52
0.94
0.040
0.35
0.01 1
LCTV
based on HBN
(mg/L)
2.7E-09
0.046
0.022
0.036
0.70
4.6
1000
32
1.4E-04
0.0018
0.0018
0.0026
1000
1.8
4.5E-04
0.036
46
18
0.036
4.8E-04
1.8E-04
322
0.027
1000
9.0
5
1.4
3.8
83
0.26
5.9E-04
1.7
0.20
1.0
Composite Liner
DAF
4.1E+05
4.4E+05
*D
*D
4.4E+05
4.4E+05
*L
4.4E+05
4.1E+05
4.1E+05
4.1E+05
*T
l.OE+08
4.4E+05
4.4E+05
*
1.7E+09
4.1E+05
4.4E+05
4.4E+05
4.1E+05
*
4.4E+05
4.4E+05
*
*
*
*
*
*
LCTV
based on MCL
(mg/L)
0.012
0.50
0.50
0.70
1000
0.50
1000
1000
1000
0.70
0.50
0.20
1000
100
1.0
1000
1000
5.0
5.0
0.20
1.0
1000
LCTV
based on HBN
(mg/L)
2.5E-04
1000
0.50
0.50
0.70
1000
1000
1000
12
164
164
0.50
1000
1000
0.70
0.50
1000
400
2.0
1000
0.20
1000
1000
1000
1000
5
5.0
1000
1000
1000
5.0
5.0
0.20
1.0
4/7/99
This table is based on a draft model and is for review purposes only.
Lf_gob.xls
-------
SILCTVTabto:
Draft LCTVs for Surface Impoundments
Common Nome
Acenophthene
Acetone (2-propanone)
Acelonilrile (methyl cyanide)
Acetophenone
Acrolcin
Acrylamide
Acrylonilrile (degrades to Acrylamide)
Aldrin
Aniline (benzenearnine)
3enz[a]anthracene
3enzene (TC = 0.5)
3enzidine
Jenzo[a]pyrene
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
Benzyl alcohol
3enzyl chloride (degrades to Benzyl
alcohol)
Bis(2-chloroelhyl)elher (degrades to 1,4-
Dioxane)
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
3is(2-ethylhexyl)phlhalate
Bromodichloromethane
Bromomethane (degrades to Methanol)
Butanol
Butyl-4,6-dinitrophenol,2-sec-(Dinoseb)
3utyl benzyl phthalate
Carbon disulfide
Carbon tetrachloride (TC = 0.5)
:hlordane(TC = 0.03)
Chloro- 1 ,3-butadiene 2-(Chloroprene)
Chloroaniline p-
Chlorobenzene (TC = 100)
Chlorobenzilate
Chlorodibromomethane
Chloroform (TC = 6.0)
Chloromethane
Chlorophenol 2-
Chloropropene, 3- (Allyl Chloride)
Chrysene
Cresolm-(TC = 200)
Cresolo-(TC = 200)
Cresolp-(TC = 200)
Cumene
ODD
DDE
DDT, p,p'- (degrades to DDE)
Di-n-butyl phthalate
CASS
83329
67641
75058
98862
107028
79061
107131
309002
62533
56553
71432
92875
50328
205992
100516
100447
111444
39638329
1178H
7527-1
7483$
71362
88857
85681
7515C
56235
5774$
12699*
10647S
10890:
510156
124481
6766;
7487:
9557!
107051
21801!
10839'
95481
106445
9882!
72548
7255!
5029:
84742
C?
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC:
c
c
r
c
c
c
c
r.
NC
NC
C
r
c
r
c
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
r
NC
NC
NC
C
r
r
c
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
c
c
NC
R
16.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
4025
1.0
583
1.2
1.0
1678
1678
1.0
2.8
1.0
1.7
35864
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.3
46.1
1.2
1.7
2065
1.1
1.1
2.0
30.2
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.2
1.0
583
1.2
1.2
1.2
7.7
2065
11606
10344
63.3
X
(yr-1)
0.00
0.00
8.23E-07
0.00
1.9E+08
0.0052
0.00012
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
119
0.067
0.00
7.15E-IO
0.00079
2.7
0.00
0.00
4.76E-05
0.00049
0.0049
3.34E-10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0017
0.00038
7.46E-05
0.00
0.00
12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0073
0.00
0.017
3.47E-05
MCL
(rriE/L)
0.0050
2.0E-04
0.0060
0.080
0.0070
0.0050
0.0020
0.10
0.080
0.080
HBN
(mE/L)
2.0
4.0
0.20
4.0
0.70
2.0E-05
2.0E-04
5.0E-06
0.010
7.7E-05
0.0030
4.0E-07
l.OE-05
7.1E-05
10
5.0E-04
8.0E-05
0.0010
0.0060
0.0014
0.050
4.0
0.040
7.0
4.0
7.0E-04
7.0E-05
0.70
0.10
0.70
3.0E-04
0.0010
0.010
6.6E-03
0.20
1.75
0.0027
2.0
2.0
0.20
1.0
4.0E-04
3.0E-04
3.0E-04
4.0
No Uncr/In-Situ Soil
DAF
2,2
1.1
1.1
1.1
*L
1.9
1.8
360
1.8
50
1.8
1.8
150
150
1.1
*D
2.3
1.8
8.9E+04
1.8
28
1.1
1.1
4.7
1.1
1.9
176
1.1
1.1
1.2
4.1
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.1
5634
50
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.6
6.7E+08
1972
*D
6.1
LCTV
Hied on MCL
(me/L)
0.0090
0.030
531
0.14
0.0077
0.0095
0.030
0.12
0.14
0.14
LCTV
bated en HBN
(mE/L)
4,4
4.4
0.22
4.4
1000
3.8E-05
3.8E-05
0.0018
0.018
0.0039
0,0054
7.2E-07
0.0015
0.011
11
11
1.8E-04
0.0018
531
0.0025
1.4
4.4
0.044
33
4.4
0.0013
0.012
0.77
0.11
0.84
0.0012
0.0018
0.018
0.012
0.22
1000
0.14
2.2
2.2
0.22
1.6
1000
0.59
0.59
24
Single Liner
DAF
50
4.8
4.9
5.0
»L
9.5
6.6
9.8E+09
6.6
2.3E+08
7.1
6.7
3.3E+09
2.1E+09
4.9
*D
40
8.4
*L
8.1
2.5E+08
4.9
5.6
150
6.0
36
1.3E+05
5.3
5.2
7.7
1.6E+04
7.8
6.9
6.6
5.4
*L
1.5E+08
5.3
5.3
5.3
24
*L
*L
*D
200
LCTV
luted on MCL
(mE/L)
0.036
1000
1000
0.65
0.039
0.18
0.030
0.77
0.62
0.55
LCTV
liiltdonllBN
(mR/L)
too
19
0.98
20
1000
1.9E-04
1.9E-04
1000
0.066
1000
0.021
2.7E-06
1000
1000
49
49
0.0032
0.0084
1000
0.011
96
20
0.22
1000
24
0.025
0.030
3.7
0.52
5.4
4.8
0.0078
0.069
0.044
1.1
1000
1000
11
11
1.1
24
1000
1000
1000
800
Composite Liner
DAF
2.2E+09
1.3E+05
I.3E+05
3.IE+05
*L
*L
1.9E+05
*L
I.7E+05
*L
7.7E+05
3.2E+05
*L
*L
2.0E+05
*D
*D
2.6E+06
*L
1.4E+06
*L
1.7E+05
1.2E+06
*L
7.8E+05
*T
*T
6.8E+05
5.3E+05
3.8E+06
*L
6.2E+05
9.3E+05
2.0E+05
7.9E+05
*L
*L
6.8E+05
6.8E+05
6.8E+05
2.5E+07
*L
*L
*D
*L
LCTV
ImtdonMCL
(me/l,)
0.50
1000
1000
1000
1000
0.50
0.030
100
1000
6.0
LCTV
butdoallDN
fme/U
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
39
1000
1000
1000
0.50
0.13
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
0.50
0.030
1000
1000
100
1000
622
6.0
1000
1000
1000
1000
200
200
200
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
4/7/99
This table is based on a draft model and is for review purposes only.
SI GCB.xls
-------
SI LCTV Table: Page 2
Common Name
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Diallate
Dibenz[a,h] anthracene
Dibromo-3-chioropropanel,2-
Dichlorobenzenel,2-
Dichlorobenzenel ,4- (TC = 7.5)
Dichlorobenzidine3,3'-
Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)
Dichloroethane 1,1- (degrades to Vinyl
chloride)
Dichlorophenol 2,4-
Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 2,4-(2,4-D)
(TC= 10)
Dichloropropane 1,2-
Dichloropropene l,3-(mixture of isomers)
Dichloropropenc cis-1 ,3-
Dichloropropene trans- 1,3-
Dieldrin
Diethyl phthalate
Diethylstilbestrol
Dimethoate (degrades to Methanol)
Dimethoxybenzidine 3,3'-
Dimethyl phthalate (degrades to
Vlethanol)
Dimethylbenz[a]anthracene 7,12-
Dimethylbenzidine 3,3'-
Dimelhylphenol 2,4-
Dinitrobenzene 1,3-
Dinitrophenol 2,4-
Dinitrotoluene 2,4- (TC = 0. 1 3)
Dinitrotoluene 2,6-
Dioxane 1,4-
Diphenylamine
Disulfoton
Endosulfan (Endosulfan I and Il.mixture)
Endrin (TC = 0.02)
Epichlorohydrin
Ethoxyethanol 2-
Ethyl acetate
Ethyl ether
Ethyl methacrylate
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Ethylbenzene
Ethylene dibromide (1,2-Dibromoethane)
Ethylene thiourea
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Formaldehyde
Formic acid
CAS#
117840
2303164
53703
96128
95501
106467
91941
75718
75343
120832
94757
78875
542756
10061015
10061026
60571
84662
56531
60515
119904
131113
57976
119937
105679
99650
51285
121142
606202
123911
122394
298044
115297
72208
106898
1 10805
141786
60297
97632
62500
100414
106934
96457
206440
86737
50000
64186
C?
NC
C
C
C
NC
C
C
NC
C
NC
NC
C
C
C
C
C
NC
C
NC
C
NC
NC
C
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
NC
C
C
NC
NC
NC
NC
R
105841
40.3
8804
1.2
4.2
4.0
6.6
1.4
1.1
1.8
1.0
1.1
I.I
1.2
1.2
321
1.3
33.7
1.0
1.1
1.0
11606
1.9
1.5
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.0
6.3
3.3
10.4
107
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
3.7
1.1
1.0
114
22.6
1.0
1.0
X
(yr-i)
8.99E-08
0.029
0.00
0.0029
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0033
0.00
0.00
0.013
0.00
12
12
0.018
0.0045
0.00
0.57
0.00
0.032
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.67
0.64
0.016
9.0
0.00
0.063
0.00
0.019
363
0.00
0.18
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MCL
(mg/L)
2.0E-04
0.60
0.075
0.0050
0.0020
0.70
5.0E-05
HBN
(mg/L)
0.70
0.0010
1.1E-05
6.0E-05
3.0
0.0040
2.0E-04
7.0
9.0E-04
0.10
0.40
0.0010
5.0E-04
5.0E-04
5.0E-04
5.0E-06
30
2.0E-08
0.0070
0.0060
400
3.0E-06
9.0E-06
0.70
0.0040
0.070
0.070
0.040
0.0080
0.90
0.0010
0.20
0.010
0.0090
10
30
7.0
3.0
3.0E-07
4.0
l.OE-06
2.0E-05
1.0
1.0
7.0
70
No Liner/In-Situ Soil
DAF
UE+10
13
1059
1.8
.3
2.0
2.1
1.2
1.8
1.2
1.1
1.9
1.8
2.1E+04
2.1E+04
2992
1.2
4.3
3.4
1.8
1.3
1972
.8
.2
.1
.1
.1
1.1
1.8
.5
32
627
78
1966
1.1
1.4
1.1
1.2
*L
1.3
3.1
1.8
10
2.8
1.1
1.1
LCTV
based on MCL
(mg/L)
3.6E-04
0.78
0.15
0.0022
0.0095
0.020
0.91
1.6E-04
LCTV
based on HBN
(mg/L)
1000
0.013
0.012
I.1E-04
3.9
0.0080
4.2E-04
8.4
4.4E-05
0.12
0.44
0.0019
9.0E-04
11
11
0.015
36
8.6E-08
0.024
0.011
22
0.0059
1.6E-05
0.84
0.0044
0.077
0.077
0.044
0.014
1.4
0.032
125
0.020
18
11
42
7.7
3.6
1000
5.2
3.1E-06
3.7E-05
10
2.8
7.7
77
Single Liner
DAF
*L
8.3E+05
2.9E+15
13
14
15
22
5.9
9.8
7.2
4.9
19
6.8
*L
*L
*L
15
110
3300
6.8
19
*L
9.2
6.3
5.0
4.8
5.2
5.0
6.6
20
1.4E-H1
*L
2.5E+08
*L
4.8
21
4.9
16
*L
12
1200
6.6
370
71
4.8
4.8
LCTV
based on MCL
(mg/L)
0.0026
8.4
1.1
0.0098
0.095
0.020
8.4
0.060
LCTV
based on HBN
(mg/L)
1000
830
1000
7.8E-04
42
0.060
0.0044
41
2.0E-04
0.72
2.0
0.019
0.0034
1000
1000
1000
450
2.2E-06
23
0.041
96
1000
8.3E-05
4.4
0.020
0.34
0.13
0.20
0.053
18
1000
1000
0.020
1000
48
630
34
48
1000
48
0.0012
1.3E-04
370
71
34
336
Composite Liner
DAF
*L
*L
*L
1.1E+08
1.2E+07
1.1E+07
2.1E+07
1.5E+06
6.3E+07
3.1E+06
1.7E+05
*L
3.9E+05
*L
*L
*L
1.4E+09
*L
*L
4.3E+05
*L
*L
3.6E+06
2.0E+06
3.1E+05
1.3E+05
6.0E+05
3.8E+05
1.3E+05
1.9E+07
*L
*L
*T
*L
1.3E+05
*L
1.7E+05
*L
*L
9.8E+06
*L
1.3E+05
*L
*L
1.3E+05
1.3E+05
LCTV
based on MCL
(mg/L)
1000
1000
7.5
0.20
1000
0.020
1000
1000
LCTV
based on HBN
(mg/L)
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
7.5
1000
1000
0.20
1000
10
1000
195
1000
1000
1000
1000'
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
32
1000
1000
1000"
0.13
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
0.020
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
2.7
1000
1000
1000
1000
4/7/99
This table is based on a draft model and is for review purposes only.
SI GCB.xls
-------
SILCTVTabfe;
Common Nome
•urnn
1CH beta-
HCH (Undone) gamma- (TC = 0,4)
(degrades 10 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene)
HCH alpha- (degrades to 1,2,4-
rrichlorobenzcnc)
leptachlor (TC = 0.008)
leplachlor epoxide
Iexachloro-l,3-butndiene (TC = 0.5)
iexachlorobenzene (TC - 0.13)
iexachloroethane (TC = 3.0)
texaehlorophene
Indenof 1 ,2,3-cd]pyrene
sobutyl alcohol
sophorone
Cepone
•lelhacrylonitrile
delhanol
vlethyl parathion (degrades to
Methanol)
vlethylcholanthrene 3-
rtethylene bromide (Dibromomethane)
Methylene Chloride (Dichloromelhane)
(degrades to Formaldehyde)
N-Nitroso-di-n-butylamine
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
N-Nitrosodiethylamine
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
N-Nitrosomethylelhylamme
N-Nitrosopiperidine
N-Nitrosopyrrolidine
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene (TC - 2.0)
Octamethyl pyrophosphoramide
3arathion (ethyl)
Pentachlorobenzene
'entachloronitrobenzene (PCNB)
Pentachlorophenol (TC - 100)
Dhenol
?henyl mercuric acetate
Phenylenediamine, 1,3-
Phorate
Polychlorinated biphenyls (Aroclors)
Pronamide
Pyrene
Pyridine(TC-S.O)
Safrole
CASH
110009
319857
58899
319846
76448
1024573
87683
118741
77474
67721
70304
193395
78831
78591
14350C
12698'i
67561
298000
56495
7495:
75092
92416:
62164:
55185
6275'
86306
10595956
10075'
930552
9120:
9895:
15216!
56382
608935
8268!
87865
108952
6238'
108452
298022
133636:
23950585
12900(
11086
94597
C?
NC
r
r
r
n
r
c
r
NC
c
NC
r
NC
c
r
NC
NC
NC
c
NC
c
c
c
c
r
c
<•
c
c
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
c
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
NC
NC
NC
C
R
1.0
8.2
7.7
8.2
432
212
77.7
686
141
11.8
267
4839
1.0
1.2
38.6
1.0
1.0
1.8
26587
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.8
1.0
1.0
1.0
4.4
1.1
1.0
4.8
654
100
4.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.2
4119
2.1
222
1.0
1.6
X
(yr-1)
0.00
0.00
0.31
0.31
18
0.018
0.00
0.00
7.2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00012
0.00
0.81
0.00
0.00
0.00029
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.80E-05
0.71
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
18
0.00
2.09E-05
0.00
0.00
0.00
MCL
(mg/L)
2.0E-04
4.0E-04
2.0E-04
0.0010
0.050
0.0050
0.0010
5.0E-04
HBN
(mg/L)
0.040
5.0E-05
7.0E-OS
l.OE-OS
2.0E-05
9.0E-06
0.0010
5.0E-05
0.30
0.0060
0.010
2.1E-04
10
0.090
2.0E-06
0.0040
20
0.0090
3.0E-06
0.40
0.010
2.0E-05
l.OE-05
6.0E-07
2.0E-06
0.020
4.0E-06
2.0E-06
4.0E-05
1.0
0.020
0.070
0.20
0.030
3.0E-04
7.0E-04
20
0.0028
0.20
0.0070
l.OE-05
3.0
1.0
0.040
5.0E-W
DAF
I.I
2.2
51
59
*T
557
7.9
59
*L
2.5
23
440
I.I
1.8
4.7
1.1
1.1
14
2.0E+04
1.1
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.9
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.4
1.1
1.1
77
56
9.7
2.0
1.1
1.1
1.1
6.3E+07
370
1.2
19
1.1
1.8
LCTY
bilttlenMCL
(mg/L)
0.010
0.21
0.0080
0.11
0.059
1000
0.0090
0.0020
0.19
LCTY
blKdlHlllBN
(mj/L)
0.044
1.1E-04
0.0036
5.9E-04
0.0080
0.0050
0.0079
0.0030
1000
0.015
0.23
0.092
11
0.16
9.4E-06
0.0044
22
0.13
0.061
0.44
0.018
3.6E-05
1.8E-05
1.1E-06
3.6E-06
0.038
7.2E-06
3.6E-06
7.2E-05
1.4
0.022
0.077
15
1.7
0.0029
0.0014
22
0.0031
0.22
1000
0.0037
3.6
19
0.044
9.0E-04
Single Liner
DAF
4.9
26
8.9E+07
2.3E+08
»T
*L
250
5.2E+08
*L
37
860
1.2E+10
4.9
7.2
120
4.9
4.8
5.9E+06
*L
5.0
6.8
7.5
6.7
6.6
6.6
12
6.7
6.6
6.6
15
5.1
4.9
6.7E+14
2.8E+08
320
15
5.0
4.8
4.8
*L
l.OE+10
8.1
720
4.9
8.2
LCTY
baled on MCI.
(rag/L)
0.40
5.6
0.0080
1000
0.13
1000
0.034
0.015
1000
LCTV
biltdwIIBN
(rag/L)
0.20
0.0013
0.40
32
0.0080
1000
0.25
0.13
1000
0.22
8.6
1000
49
0.65
2.4E-04
0.020
96
96
1000
2.0
0.068
1.5E-04
6.7E-05
4.0E-06
1.3E-05
0.24
2.7E-05
1.3E-05
2.6E-04
15
0.10
0.34
1000
1000
0.096
0.011
100
0.013
0.96
1000
1000
24
720
0.20
0.0041
DAF
2.4E+05
2.7E+07
*D
*L
*T
»T
+T
*T
*L
4.1E+07
*L
*L
1.7E+05
9.2E+05
l.OE+30
2.0E+05
1.3E+05
*L
*L
2.8E+05
3.5E+05
1.4E+06
2.4E+05
1.3E+05
1.7E+05
7.0E+06
2.4E+05
1.3E+05
1.3E+05
1.3E+07
4.6E+05
1.8E+05
*L
*L
*L
1.2E+07
3.1E+05
1.3E+05
1.3E+05
*L
*L
5.6E+06
*L
1.7E+05
2.3E+06
LCTV
bind «n MCL
(mg/L)
0.40
1000
0.0080
1000
0.13
1000
1000
100
1000
LCTV
butdnnllBN
(mg/L)
1000
1000
0.40
1000
0.0080
1000
0.50
0.13
1000
3.0
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
787
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
28
2.4
0.078
0.34
1000
0.96
0.26
5.2
1000
2.0
1000
1000
1000
1000
100
1000
364
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
5.0
1000
4/7/99
This table is based on a draft model and is for review purposes only.
SI_GCB.xls
-------
SI LCTV Table: Page 4
Common Name
Strychnine and sails
Styrene
fCDDioxin 2, 3, 7, 8-
retrachlorobenzene 1,2,4,5-
Tetrachloroethane 1 , 1 , 1 ,2- (degrades to
Frichloroethylene)
Fetrachloroethane 1,1,2,2- (degrades to
Frichloroethylene)
retrachloroethylene (TC = 0.7)
Fetrachlorophenol 2,3,4,6-
Fetraethyl dithiopyrophosphate (Sulfotep)
Toluene
Foluenediamine 2,4-
Foluidine p-
Foxaphene (chlorinated camphenes)
(TC = 0.5)
rribromomethane (Bromoform)
Frichloro- 1 ,2,2-trifluoro- ethane 1 , 1 ,2-
Frichlorobenzene 1,2,4-
Frichloroethane 1,1,1-
Frichloroethane 1,1, 2- (degrades to 1,1-
3ichloroethylene)
Frichloroethylene (1,1 ,2-Trichloroethylene)
(TC = 0.5)
Frichlorofluoromethane (Freon 1 1)
Frichlorophenol 2,4,5- (TC = 400)
llTrichlorophenol 2,4,6- (TC = 2.0) |
Frichlorophenoxyjpropionic acid 2-(2,4,5-
(Silvex)(TC= 1.0)
Vinyl chloride (TC = 0.2)
Xylenes (total)
Barium (TC = 100 )
Cadmium (TC= 1.0)
Chromium (HI)
Copper
Lead (TC = 5.0)
Nickel
Silver (TC - 5.0)
/anadium
Zinc
Antimony
Arsenic (TC = 5.0)
Chromium (VI) (TC = 5.0)
Mercury (TC = 0.2)
Selenium (TC= 1.0)
Thallium
CAS#
57249
100425
1746016
95943
630206
79345
127184
58902
3689245
108883
95807
95534
106490
8001352
75252
76131
120821
71556
79005
79016
75694
95954
88062
93721
75014
1330207
7440393
7440417
7440439
16065381
7440508
7439921
7440020
7440224
7440622
7440666
7440360
7440382
7440473
7439976
7782492
7440280
C?
NC
NC
C
NC
C
C
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
C
C
C
C
NC
NC
NC
C
C
NC
NC
C
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
NC
NC
NC
C
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
NC
NC
NC
NC
R
1.2
2.8
3348
52.1
2.4
1.3
1.4
1.6
9.6
1.7
1.0
1.0
1.0
55.3
1.3
3.5
25.2
1.4
1.1
1.3
1.3
3.3
1.5
1.1
1.0
4.2
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
X
(y-i)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0041
0.22
0.00
0.00
24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.020
0.00014
0.00
0.00
0.22
0.00080
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
MCL
(mg/L)
0.10
3.0E-08
0.0050
1.0
0.0030
0.10
0.070
0.20
0.0050
0.0050
0.0020
10
2
0.005
0.1
0.006
0.05
0.1
0.002
0.05
0.002
HBN
(mg/L)
0.010
7.0
6.0E-10
0.010
0.0030
4.0E-04
0.40
1.0
0.020
7.0
3.0E-05
4.0E-04
4.0E-04
8.0E-05
1000
0.40
0.00 10
0.0080
10
4.0
0.0080
0.30
4.0E-05
70
0.0040
40
1.0
0.015
0.20
0.30
10
0.014
5.7E-05
0.175
0.011
0.175
No Lincr/In-Situ Soil
DAF
1.1
1.2
300
5,2
1.9
3.9
1.2
1.2
*L
1.2
1.8
1.8
1.8
12
1.8
1.3
3.0
2.6
1.8
1.8
1.2
1.3
1.8
1.1
1.1
1.3
45
33
23
15
6.7
73
LCTV
based on MCL
(mg/L)
0.12
9.0E-06
0,0090
0.0090
0.0060
1.2
0.036
0.18
0,21
0.52
0.0090
0.0090
0,0022
13
5.3
0.077
!.l
0.27
1.7
2.3
0.030
0.33
0.15
LCTV
based on HBN
(mg/L)
0.011
8.4
1.8E-07
0.052
0.0057
0.0016
0.48
1.2
1000
8.4
5.4E-05
7.2E-04
7.2E-04
9.6E-04
1000
1.2
1.8E-04
0.014
12
5.2
0.014
0.33
4.4E-05
91
0.018
1000
7.1
5
0.81
3.6
63
0.63
0.0019
4.0
0.17
1.0
Single Liner
DAF
5.4
10
7.9E+09
170
54
3.4E+04
6.1
6.4
*L
6.9
6.6
6.7
6.7
6.4E+05
7.6
12
80
2.8E+04
8.0
7.5
5.8
11
7.9
5.3
4.9
14
1360
969
645
545
166
LCTV
based on MCL
(mg/L)
1.0
237
0.038
0.038
0.031
6.9
0.50
0.76
5.6
1000
0.040
0.038
0.0098
140
95
1.0
28
8.2
5.0
5.0
0.20
1.0
LCTV
based on HBN
(mg/L)
0.054
70
4.7
1.7
0.060
0.060
0.70
6.4
1000
48
2.0E-04
0.0027
0.0027
0.50
1000
32
7.0E-04
0.060
58
44
0.063
1.0
2.0E-04
980
0.28
1000
164
5
5.0
119
1000
19
0.055
5.0
0.20
1.0
Composite Liner
DAF
9.0E+05
6.8E+06
*L
*L
*D
*D
1.7E+06
2.2E+06
*L
2.8E+06
1.3E+05
3.2E+05
3.2E+05
*T
3.6E+05
9.2E+06
*L
*L
1.4E+06
1.4E+06
1.4E+06
8.4E+06
1.9E+06
6.8E+05
2.4E+05
1.2E+07
*L
*T
*T
*T
*T
LCTV
based on MCL
(mg/L)
1000
1000
0.50
0.50
0.70
1000
0.50
1000
1000
1 000
0.70
0.50
0.20
1000
100
1.0
1000
1000
5.0
5.0
0.20
1.0
LCTV
based on HBN
(mg/L)
1000
1000
1000
1000
0.50
0.50
0.70
1000
1000
1000
3.9
128
128
0.50
1000
1000
0.70
0.50
1000
400
2.0
1.0
0.20
1000
1000
1000
1000
5
5.0
1000
1000
1000
5.0
5.0
0.20
1.0
4/7/99
This table is based on a draft model and is for review purposes only,
SI_GCB.xls
-------
-------
Draft LCTVs for Waste Piles
WPLCTV Table: Page 1
Common Name
Acenaphthene
Acetone (2-propanone)
Acetonitrile (methyl cyanide)
Acetophenone
Acrolein
Acrylamide
Acrylonitrile (degrades to Acrylamide)
Aldrin
Aniline (benzeneamine)
Benz[a]anthracene
Benzene (TC = 0.5 )
Benzidine
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
Benzyl alcohol
Benzyl chloride (degrades to Benzyl
alcohol)
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether (degrades to 1,4-
Dioxane)
B is(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Bromodichloromethane
Bromomethane (degrades to Methanol)
Butanol
Butyl-4,6-dinilrophenol,2-sec-(Dinoseb)
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Carbon disulfide
Carbon tetrachloride (TC = 0.5)
Chlordane (TC = 0.03)
Chloro- 1 ,3-butadiene 2-(Chloroprene)
Chloroaniline p-
Chlorobenzene (TC = 100)
Chlorobenzilate
Chlorodibromomethane
Chloroform (TC = 6.0)
Chloromethane
Chlorophenol 2-
Chlorppropene, 3- (Allyl Chloride)
Chrysene
Cresol m- (TC = 200)
Cresol o- (TC = 200)
Cresol p- (TC = 200)
Cumene
ODD
DDE
DDT, p,p'- (degrades to DDE)
CAS#
83329
67641
75058
98862
107028
79061
107131
309002
62533
56553
71432
92875
50328
205992
100516
100447
111444
39638329
117817
75274
74839
71363
88857
85687
75150
56235
57749
126998
106478
108907
510156
124481
67663
74873
95578
107051
218019
108394
95487
106445
98828
72548
72559
50293
C?
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
NC
NC
C
C
C
C
C
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
C
NC
NC
NC
C
C
C
C
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
C
C
R
16.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
4025
1.0
583
1.2
1.0
1678
1678
1.0
2.8
1.0
1.7
35864
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.3
46.1
1.2
1.7
2065
1.1
1.1 •
2.0
30.2
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.2
1.0
583
1.2
1.2
1.2
7.7
2065
11606
10344.
X
fvr-1)
0.00
0.00
8.23E-07
0.00
1.9E+08
0.0052
0.00012
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
119
0.067
0.00
7.15E-10
0.00079
2.7
0.00
0.00
4.76E-05
0.00049
0.0049
3.34E-10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0017
0.00038
7.46E-05
0.00
0.00
12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0073
0.00
0.017
MCL
(mg/L)
0.0050
2.0E-04
0.0060
0.080
0.0070
0.0050
0.0020
0.10
0.080
0.080
HBN
ftns/L)
2.0
4.0
0.20
4.0
0.70
2.0E-05
2.0E-04
5.0E-06
0.010
7.7E-05
0.0030
4.0E-07
l.OE-05
7.1E-05
10
5.0E-04
8.0E-05
0.0010
0.0060
0.0014
0.050
4.0
0.040
7.0
4.0
7.0E-04
7.0E-05
0.70
0.10
0.70
3.0E-04
0.0010
0.010
6.6E-03
0.20
1.75
0.0027
2.0
2.0
0.20
1.0
4.0E-04
3.0E-04
3.0E-04
No Liner/In-Situ Soil
DAF
64
8.6
8.6
8.8
*L
15
12
4.6E+10
12
3400
13
12
l.OE+10
1.1E+10
8.7
*D
50
14
*L
13
2.1E+06
8.7
9.7
180
9.4
19
1.6E+10
9.2
9.0
12
1400
13
12
12
9.3
*L
3300
9.2
9.2
9.2
33
*L
l.OE+12
*D
LCTV
based on MCL
(me/L)
0.065
1000
1000
1.0
0.068
0,095
0.030
1.2
1.0
0.96
LCTV
based on HBN
(mE/L)
128
34
1.7
35
1000
3.0E-04
3.0E-04
1000
0.12
0.26
0.039
4.8E-06
1000
1000
87
87
0.0040
0.014
1000
0.018
172
35
0.39
1000
38
0.013
0.030
6.4
0.90
8.4
0.42
0.013
0.12
0.079
1.9
1000
8.9
18
18
1.8
33
1000
1000
1000
Single Liner
DAF
230
21
21
21
*L
41
28
1.5E+13
28
4.9E+04
30
29
3.3E+12
3.7E+I2
21
*D
300
37
*L
32
1.1E+11
21
24
660
24
75
4.5E+06
23
22
35
5.0E+05
32
29
28
23
*L
4.7E+04
23
23
23
110
*L
*L
*L
LCTV
based on MCL
(ma/L)
0.15
1000
1000
2.6
0.17
0.38
0.030
3.5
2.6
2.3
LCTV
based on HBN
(me/l>)
460
84
4.2
84
1000
8.2E-04
8.2E-04
1000
0.28
3.8
0.090
1.2E-05
1000
1000
210
210
0.024
0.037
1000
0.045
420
84
0.96
1000
96
0.053
0.030
16
2.2
25
150
0.032
0.29
0.18
4.6
1000
127
46
46
4.6
110
1000
1000
1000
Composite Liner
DAF
*L
2.4E+09
2.4E+09
9.1E+11
*L
*L
6.8E+09
*L
1.5E+11
*L
2.6E+12
7.6E+1 1
*L
*L
3.6E+11
*D
*L
*L
*L
*L
*L
1.8E+11
5.1E+12
*L
*L
*T
*T
2.7E+12
2.0E+12
*T
*L
*L
7.5E+11
3.6E+11
3.3E+12
*L
*L
2.7E+12
2.7E+12
2.7E+12
*L
*L
*L
*L
LCTV
based on MCL
(me/L)
0.50
1000
1000
1000
1000
0.50
0.030
100
1000
6.0
LCTV
based on HBN
(me/L)
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
0.50
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
0.50
0.030
1000
1000
too
1000
1000
6.0
1000
1000
1000
1000
200
200
200
1000
1000
1000
1000
4/7/99
This table is based on a draft model and is for review purposes only.
WP GCB.xls
-------
WPLCTVTaMo: PtgnZ
)i-n-butyl phihalate
>i-n-octyl phlhalsie
)i»llate
)ibenz[a,h]anthracene
)ibromo-3-chloropropancl,2-
)ichlorobenzenel,2-
>ichlorobenzenel,4- (TC = 7.5)
)iehlorobenzidine3,3'-
)ichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)
Jichloroelhane 1,1- (degrades to Vinyl
chloride)
)ichlorophenol 2,4-
)ichlorophenoxyacetic acid 2,4-(2,4-D)
(TC= 10)
Dichloropropane 1,2-
Dichloronropene l,3-(mixlure of isomers)
Dicliloropropene cis-1,3-
Dichloropropene trans- 1,3-
)ieldrin
Dielhyl phlhalate
Diethylslilbeslrol
Dimethoate (degrades to Methanol)
Dimethyl phlhalate (degrades to
Methanol)
Dimethylbenz[a]anthracene 7,12-
5imethylbenzidine 3,3'-
Dimethylphenol 2,4-
Dinitrobenzene 1,3-
Oinitrophenol 2,4-
Dinitrotoluene 2,4- (TC = 0.13)
Dinitrotoluene 2,6-
3ioxane 1,4-
Diphenylamine
Qisulfoton
andosulfan (Bndosulfan 1 and Il.mixture)
||Endrin (TC - 0.02)
Epichlorohydrin
Ethoxyethanol 2-
Ethyl acetate
Ethyl ether
Ethyl methacrylate
Ethyl methanesulfonate
Ethylbenzene
Ethylene dibromide (1,2-Dibromoethane)
Ethylene thiourea
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Formaldehyde
CAS»
84742
117840
2303164
53703
96128
95501
106467
91941
75718
75343
120832
94757
78875
542756
10061015
10061026
60571
8466;
56531
60515
11990'
131113
57976
11993'
10567!
9965C
51285
121142
60620:
12391
12239'
29804'
11529'
10689!
1 10805
141781
6029'
97632
6250
10041'
10693'
9645'
206441
8673'
5000'
C?
NC
NC
c
c
c
NC.
c
c
NC
C
NC
NC
C
C
C
c
c
NC
C
NC
C
NC
NC
C
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
NC
NC
NC
C
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
NC
C
c
NC
Nr
NC
R
633
105841
40.3
8804
1.2
4.2
4.0
6.6
1.4
1.1
1.8
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.2
321
1.3
33.7
1.0
1.1
1.0
11606
1.9
1.5
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.0
6.3
3.3
10.4
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
3.7
1.1
1
114
22.6
1.0
X
(yr-1)
3.47E-05
8.99E-08
0.029
0.00
0.0029
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0033
0.00
0.00
0.013
0.00
12
12
0.018
0.0045
0.00
0.57
0.00
0.032
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.67
0.64
9.0
0.00
0.063
0.00
0.019
363
0.00
0.18
0.0000
0.00
0.00
0.00
MCL
(rog/L)
2.0E-04
0.60
0.075
0.0050
0.70
5.0E-05
IIBN
(mg/L)
4.0
0.70
0.0010
1.1E-05
6.0E-05
3.0
0.0040
2.0E-04
7.0
9.0E-04
0.10
0.40
0.0010
5.0E-04
5.0E-04
5.0E-04
5.0E-06
30
2.0E-08
0.0070
0.0060
400
3.0E-06
9.0E-06
0.70
0.0040
0.070
0.070
0.040
0.0080
0.90
0.0010
0.20
0.0090
10
30
7.0
3.0
3.0E-07
4.0
l.OE-06
2.0E-05
1.0
1.0
7.0
DAF
240
*L
8.1E+05
I.2E+1I
14
20
23
32
10
14
12
8.7
17
12
*L
*L
2.3E+12
11
130
1100
12
18
8.2E+11
15
11
8.8
8.6
9.1
8.9
12
28
3.0E+06
2.8E+12
1.9E+13
8.6
24
8.7
15
*L
18
2400
12
460
88
8.6
LCTY
toed N MCL
0.0028
12
1.7
0.017
0.085
13
0.12
LCTV
bimUnllBN
(mg/L)
1000
810
1000
8.4E-04
60
0.092
0,0064
70
3.5E-04
1.2
3.5
0.017
0.0060
1000
1000
1000
330
2.6E-06
7.7
0.072
172
1000
1.4E-04
7.7
0.035
0.60
0.13
0.36
0.096
25
1000
1000
1000
86
720
61
45
1000
72
0.0024
2.4E-04
460
88
60
DAF
*L
1.9E+07
347
41
66
70
110
26
35
32
21
54
29
*L
*L
*L
38
490
5.2E+04
29
70
*L
41
28
21
21
22
21
28
95
1.9E+10
*L
6 8E+09
*L
21
130
21
53
*L
58
3.0E+04
28
2700
330
21
LCTV
biitdanMCl.
(ing/L)
0.0082
40
5.3
0.042
0.27
0020
41
1.5
LCTV
bind «n IIBN
(rag/L)
1000
1000
0.0038
0.0025
198
0.28
0.022
182
8.4E-04
3.2
8.4
0.054
0.015
1000
1000
1000
1140
9.8E-06
364
0.17
420
1000
3.7E-04
20
0.084
1.5
0.13
0.84
0.22
86
1000
1000
0020
1000
210
1000
147
159
1000
232
0.030
5.7E-04
1000
330
147
DAF
*U
*L
«L
*
*T
»L
6.9E+12
*D
*L
1.8E+11
*L
1.1E+12
*L
*L
*L
*L
*L
*L
1.2E+12
*L
*L
*L
9.4E+12
9.1E+II
2.4E+09
2.4E+I2
1.3E+12
2.5E+09
*L
*L
*L
*T
*L
2.4E+09
*L
1.8E+11
*L
*L
*L
*L
2.5E+09
*L
*L
2.4E+09
LCTV
burden MCL
(rng/L)
1000
1000
7.5
0.20
1000
0.020
1000
1000
LCTV
biKdtnllDN
(mg/L)
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
7.5
1000
1000
0.20
1000
10
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
0.13
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
0.020
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
4/7/99
This table is based on a draft model and is for review purposes only.
WP GCB.xls
-------
WP LCTV Table: Page 3
Common Name
Formic acid
Furan
HCH bela-
HCH (Undone) gamma- (TC = 0.4)
[degrades to 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene)
HCH alpha- (degrades to 1,2,4-
rrichlorobenzene)
Heptachlor(TC = 0.008)
Heptachlor epoxide
Hexachloro-l,3-butadiene (TC = 0.5)
Hexachlorobenzene (TC = 0. 13)
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachloroethane (TC = 3.0)
Hexachlorophene
Indeno[l,2,3-cd]pyrene
Isobutyl alcohol
Isophorone
Kepone
Methacrylonitrile
Methanol
Methyl paralhion (degrades to
tfethanol)
Methylcholanthrene 3-
Methylene bromide (Dibromomethane)
Methylene Chloride (Dichloromethane)
degrades to Formaldehyde)
N-Nitroso-di-n-butylamine
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
N-Nitrosodiethylamine
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
N-Nitrosomelhylethylamine
N-Nitrosopiperidine
N-Nitrosopynolidine
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene (TC = 2.0)
Octamethyl pyrophosphoramide
Parathion (ethyl)
Pentachlorobenzene
Pentachloronitrobenzene (PCNB)
Pentachlorophenol (TC = 100)
Phenol
Phenyl mercuric acetate
Phenylenediamine, 1,3-
Phorate
Polychlorinated biphenyls (Aroclors)
Pronamide
Pyrene
Pyndme (TC = 5.0)
CAS#
64186
110009
319857
58899
319846
76448
1024573
87683
118741
77474
67721
70304
193395
78831
78591
143500
126987
67561
298000
56495
74953
75092
924163
621647
55185
62759
86306
10595956
100754
930552
91203
98953
152169
56382
608935
82688
87865
108952
62384
108452
298022
1336363
23950585
129000
110861
C?
NC
NC
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
NC
C
NC
C
NC
C
C
NC
NC
NC
C
NC
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
C
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
NC
NC
NC
R
1.0
1.0
8.2
7.7
8.2
432
212
77.7
686
141
11.8
267
4839
1.0
1.2
38.6
1.0
1.0
1.8
26587
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.8
1.0
1.0
1.0
4.4
1.1
1.0
4.8
654
100
4.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.2
4119
2.1
222
1.0
X
(yr-D
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.31
0.31
18
0.018
0.00
0.00
7.2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00012
0.00
0.81
0.00
0.00
0.00029
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.80E-05
0.71
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
18
0.00
2.09E-05
0.00
0.00
MCL
(mg/L)
2.0E-04
4.0E-04
2.0E-04
0.0010
0.050
0.0050
0.0010
5.0E-04
HBN
(mg/L)
70
0.040
5.0E-05
7.0E-05
l.OE-05
2.0E-05
9.0E-06
0.0010
5.0E-05
0.30
0.0060
0.010
2.1E-04
10
0.090
2.0E-06
0.0040
20
0.0090
3.0E-06
0.40
0.010
2.0E-05
l.OE-05
6.0E-07
2.0E-06
0.020
4.0E-06
2.0E-06
4.0E-05
1.0
0.020
0.070
0.20
0.030
3.0E-04
7.0E-04
20
0.0028
0.20
0.0070
l.OE-05
3.0
1.0
0.040
NoLiner/In-SituSoil
DAF
8.6
8.7
38
2.0E+06
2.1E+06
*T
1.2E+12
290
4000
*L
52
1400
5.9E+10
8.7
13
150
8.6
8.6
1.2E+06
*L
8.8
12
13
12
12
12
19
12
12
12
21
9.0
8.6
2.9E+09
3800
370
23
8.8
8.6
8.6
*L
4.8E+10
13
1100
8.7
LCTV
based on MCL
(mg/L)
0.40
6.9
0.0080
1000
0.13
1000
0.060
0.023
1000
LCTV
based on HBN
(mg/L)
602
0.35
0.0019
0.40
21
0.0080
1000
0.29
0.13
1000
0.31
14
1000
87
1.2
3.0E-04
0.034
172
172
1000
3.5
0.12
2.6E-04
1.2E-04
7.2E-06
2.4E-05
0.38
4.8E-05
2.4E-05
4.8E-04
21
0.18
0.60
1000
114
0.11
0.016
176
0.024
1.7
1000
1000
39
1000
0.35
Single Liner
DAF
21
21
130
5.3E+10
5.5E+11
*T
*L
1100
5.9E+04
*L
180
1.7E+04
1.9E+13
21
31
560
21
21
7.0E+10
*L
21
28
32
28
28
28
54
28
28
28
69
22
21
3.2E+19
5.4E+04
1400
71
21
21
21
*L
1.5E+13
36
1.3E+04
21
LCTV
based on MCL
(mg/L)
0.40
25
0.0080
1000
0.13
1000
0.14
0.071
1000
LCTV
based on HBN
(mg/L)
1000
0.84
0.0065
0.40
144
0.0080
1000
0.50
0.13
1000
1.1
170
1000
210
2.8
0.0011
0.084
420
420
1000
8.4
0.28
6.4E-04
2.8E-04
1.7E-05
5.6E-05
1.1
1.1E-04
5.6E-05
0.0011
69
0.44
1.5
1000
1000
0.42
0.050
420
0.057
4.2
1000
1000
108
1000
0.84
Composite Liner
DAF
2.4E+09
5.5E+11
*L
*T
*
*L
*L
*T
*T
*L
*T
*L
*L
1.8E-H1
3.2E+12
*L
6.6E+09
2.4E+09
*L
*L
7.3E+11
*L
5.0E+12
4.6E+11
2.5E+09
1.5E+11
*L
4.6E+11
2.5E+09
2.5E+09
*L
1.6E+12
5.7E+09
*L
*L
*L
*T
9.1E-H1
2.4E+09
2.4E+09
*L
*L
*L
*L
1.8E+11
LCTV
based on MCL
(mg/L)
0.40
1000
0.0080
1000
0.13
1000
1000
100
1000
LCTV
based on HBN
(mg/L)
1000
1000
1000
0.40
1000
0.0080
1000
0.50
0.13
1000
3.0
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
2.0
1000
1000
1000
1000
100
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
5.0
4/7/99
This table is based on a draft model and is for review purposes only.
WP_GCB.xls
-------
Safrole
Strychnine and sails
Slyrene
•CDDioxin2.3.7,8-
'etrachlorobenzene 1,2,4,5-
relrachloroethane 1 , 1 , 1 ,2- (degrades to
rrichloroethylene)
retrachloroelliane 1,1,2,2- (degrades to
rrichloroethylene)
'etrachloroethylene (TC = 0.7)
Telrachlorophenol 2,3,4,6-
retraethyl dilhiopyrophosplialc (Sulfolep)
Toluene
'oluenediamine 2,4-
Poluidine o-
roluidine p-
["oxaphene (chlorinated camphenes)
(TC = 0.5)
rribromomethane (Bromofonti)
rrichloro-l,2,2-trifluoro- ethane 1,1,2-
rrichlorobenzene 1 ,2,4-
rrichloroethane 1,1,1-
rrichloroethane 1,1,2- (degrades to 1,1-
Dichloroethylene)
rrichloroethylene (1,1 ,2-Trichloroethylene)
(TC = 0.5)
rrichlorofluoromethane (Freon 1 1)
Trichlorophenol 2,4,5- (TC = 400)
Trichlorophenol 2,4,6- (TC = 2.0)
rrichlorophenoxy)propionic acid 2-(2,4,5-
(Silvex)(TC=1.0)
Vinyl chloride (TC = 0.2)
Xylenes (total)
Barium (TC = 100)
Beryllium
Cadmium (TC= 1.0)
Chromium (HI)
Copper
Lead (TC = 5.0)
Nickel
Silver (TC = 5.0)
Vanadium
Zinc
Antimony
Arsenic (TC = 5.0)
Chromium (VI) (TC = 5.0)
Mercury (TC = 0.2)
Selenium (TC= 1.0)
94597
57249
100425
1746016
95943
630206
79345
I27184
58905
3689245
108882
95SQ'i
9553<
I0649C
8001352
75252
7613)
120821
71556
79005
79016
7569'
9595'
9372
75014
133020'
744039:
744041'
744043'
1606538
744050:
743992
7440021
744022'
744062:
744066'
744036'
744038:
744047:
743997
778249:
('
NO
NO
C
NO
0
0
NO
NO
NO
NO
O
c
0
0
c
NO
NO
NO
o
0
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
C
NO
NO
NO
C
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
C
NO
NO
NO
1.6
1.2
2.8
3348
52,1
2.4
1.3
1.4
1.6
9.6
1.7
1.0
1.0
1.0
55.3
1.3
3.5
25.2
1.4
1.1
1.3
1.3
3.3
1.5
1.1
1.0
4.2
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
X
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0041
0.22
0.00
0.00
24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.020
0.00014
0.00
0.00
0.22
0.00080
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
MCL
(rag/D
0.10
3.0E-08
0.0050
1.0
0.0030
0.10
0.070
0.20
0.0050
0.0050
0.0020
10
2
0.005
0.1
0.006
0.05
0.1
0.002
0.05
I1BN
(rog/L)
0.010
7.0
6.0E-IO
0.010
0.0030
4.0E-04
0.40
1.0
0.020
7.0
3.0E-05
4.0E-04
4.0E-04
8.0E-05
1000
0.40
0.0010
0.0080
10
4.0
0.30
4.0E-05
70
0.0040
40
1.0
0.015
0.20
0.30
10
0.014
5.68E-0'
0.175
0.011
0.175
DAF
9.4
15
3.6E+10
200
24
2.5E+04
10
11
*L
11
12
12
12
5.3E+05
13
18
98
2.1E+04
13
13
9.9
17
9.2
8.7
20
836
590
406
414
110
1470
LCTV
biltdtuMCL
(rog/L)
1.5
1000
0.065
0.065
0.050
11
0.50
1.3
6.9
1000
0.065
0.065
0.017
200
69
1.0
21
5.0
5.0
5.0
0.20
1.0
2.9
LCTV
tiKdonllBN
(mB/L)
0.094
105
22
2.0
0.072
0.10
0.70
11
1000
77
3.6E-04
0.0048
0.0048
0.50
1000
39
0.0012
0.10
99
68
0 11
1.0
3.5E-04
1000
0.24
1000
129
5
5.0
82
1000
12
0.034
5.0
0.20
1.0
DAF
23
47
1.2E+I3
740
100
2.9E+06
27
28
*L
31
28
29
29
1.9E+07
32
56
360
3.2E+06
31
32
25
52
34
23
21
66
3330
2100
1450
1590
383
6430
LCTV
toed m MCL
(»I/L)
4.7
1000
0.16
0.16
0.14
31
0.50
3.2
25
1000
0.16
0.16
0.042
660
100
1.0
80
20
5.0
5.0
0.20
1.0
13
LCTV
butdonllBX
Owgrt.)
0.23
329
1000
7.4
0.26
0.26
0.70
28
1000
217
8.4E-04
0.012
0.012
0.50
1000
144
0.0030
0.26
250
208
027
1.0
8.4E-04
1000
0.78
1000
401 '
5
5.0
268
1000
^47 '
0.12
5.0
0.20
1.0
DAF
3.8E-H2
*L
»L
*L
*D
*D
7.8E+12
*L
*L
*L
2.5E+09
7.6E+1I
7.6E+11
*T
*L
*L
*L
*L
*D
5.0E+12
6.2E+12
*T
72E+12
2.7E+12
5.5E+11
*L
*L
*T
*T
*T
*T
*L
LCTV
burton MCL
(mg/y_
1000
1000
0.50
0.50
0.70
1000
0.50
1000
1000
1000
0.70
0.50
0.20
1000
100
1.0
1000
1000
5.0
5.0
0.20
1.0
1000
LCTV
tMMdtnllBN
<»B/M
1000
1000
1000
1000
0.50
0.50
0.70
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
0.50
1000
1000
0.70
0.50
1000
400
2.0
1.0
0.20
1000
1000
1000
' 1000 1
5
5.0
1000
1000
1000
5.0
5.0
0.20
1.0
4/7/99
This table is based on a draft model and is for review purposes only.
WP_GCB.xls
-------
LAULCTV Table: Pagel
Draft LCTVs for Land Application Units
Common Name
Acenaphthene
Acetone (2-propanone)
Acetonitrile (methyl cyanide)
Acetophenone
Acrolein
Acrylanude
Aciylonitrile (degrades to Aciylamide)
Aldrin
Aniline (benzeneamuie)
Benz[a]anthracene
Benzene (TC = 0.5)
Benzidine
Benzo[a]pyrene
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
Benzyl alcohol
Benzyl chloride (degrades to Benzyl
alcohol)
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether (degrades to 1,4-
Dioxane)
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Bromodichloromethane
Bromomethane (degrades to Methanol)
Butanol
ButyI-4,6-dinitrophenol,2-sec-(Dinoseb)
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Caibon disulfide
Carbon tetrachloride (TC = 0.5)
Chlordane (TC = 0.03)
Chloro-l,3-butadiene 2-(Chloroprene)
Chloroaniline p-
Chlorobenzene (TC = 100)
Chlorobenzilate
Chlorodibromomethane
Chlorofoim (TC = 6.0)
Chloromethane
Chlorophenol 2-
Chloropropene, 3- (Allyl Chloride)
Chrysene
Cresolm-(TC = 200)
Cresol o- (TC = 200)
Cresolp-(TC = 200)
Cumene
ODD
DDE
DDT, p,p'- (degrades to DDE)
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
Diallate
Dibenz[a,h]anthracene
Dibromc-3-chloropropane 1 ,2-
Dichlorobenzenel,2-
Dichlorobenzenel,4- (TC = 7.5)
Dichlorobenzidine3,3 '-
Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)
Dichloroethane 1,1- (degrades to Vinyl
chloride)
CAS#
83329
67641
75058
98862
107028
79061
107131
309002
62533
56553
71432
92875
50328
205992
100516
100447
111444
39638329
117817
75274
74839
71363
88857
85687
75150
56235
57749
126998
106478
108907
510156
124481
67663
74873
95578
107051
218019
108394
95487
106445
98828
72548
72559
50293
84742
117840
2303164
53703
96128
95501
106467
91941
75718
75343
C?
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
NC
NC
C
C
C
C
C
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
C
NC
NC
NC
C
C
C
C
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
C
C
NC
NC
C
C
C
NC
C
C
NC
C
R
16.0
1.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
4025
1.0
583
1.2
1.0
1678
1678
1.0
2.8
1.0
1.7
35864
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.3
46.1
1.2
1.7
2065
1.1
1.1
2.0
30.2
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.2
1.0
583
1.2
.2
1.2
7.7
2065
11606
10344
63.3
105841
40.3
8804
1.2
4.2
4.0
6.6
1.4
1.1
Jl
(vr-1)
0.00
0.00
8.23E-07
0.00
1.9E+08
0.0052
0.00012
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
119
0.067
0.00
7.15E-10
0.00079
2.7
0.00
0.00
4.76E-05
0.00049
0.0049
3.34E-10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0017
0.00038
7.46E-05
0.00
0.00
12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0073
0.00
0.017
3.47E-05
8.99E-08
0.029
0.00
0.0029
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0033
MCL
(mg/L)
0.0050
2.0E-04
0.0060
0.080
0.0070
0.0050
0.0020
0.10
0.080
0.080
2.0E-04
0.60
0.075
HBN
(rna/L)
2.0
4.0
0.20
4.0
0.70
2.0E-05
2.0E-04
5.0E-06
0.010
7.7E-05
0.0030
4.0E-07
l.OE-05
7.1E-05
10
5.0E-04
8.0E-05
0.0010
0.0060
0.0014
0.050
4.0
0.040
7.0
4.0
7.0E-04
7.0E-05
0.70
0.10
0.70
3.0E-04
0.0010
0.010
6.6E-03
0.20
1.75
0.0027
2.0
2.0
0.20
1.0
4.0E-04
3.0E-04
3.0E-04
4.0
0.70
0.0010
1.1E-05
6.0E-05
3.0
0.0040
2.0E-04
7.0
9.0E-04
No Liner/In-Situ Soil
DAF
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
*
2.1
1.7
4960
1.7
2.9
1.7
1.7
23
23
1.5
*
5.3
1.7
4.2E+22
1.8
1.6E+06
1.5
1.5
1.6
1.5
2.1
56
1.5
1.5
1.5
4.0
.7
.7
.7
.5
*
2.9
.5
.5
.5
.5
*
l.OE+10
*
1.6
4.7E+14
2500
1.2E+08
.9
.5
.7
.7
.5
1.9
LCTV
based on MCL
(rng/L)
0.0085
0.0046
1000
0.14
0.011
0.011
0.030
0.15
0.14
0.14
3.8E-04
0.90
0.13
0.0030
LCTV
based on HBN
(mg/L)
3.0
6.0
0.30
6.0
1000
4.2E-05
4.2E-05
0.025
0.017
2.2E-04
0.0051
6.8E-07
2.3E-04
0.0016
15
15
4.2E-04
0.0017
1000
0.0025
30
6.0
0.060
11
6.0
0.0015
0.0039
1.1
0.15
1.1
0.0012
0.0017
0.017
0.011
0.30
1000
0.0078
3.0
3.0
0.30
1.5
1000
1000
1000
6.4
1000
2.5
1000
1.1E-04
4.5
0.0068
3.4E-04
11
6.0E-05
4/7/99
This table is based on a draft model and is for review purposes only.
LAU_GCB.xls
-------
LAU LCTV Table: Page 2
Common Name
Dichlotoethanel,2-crc=0.5) (degrades to
Vinyl chloride)
Dkhlofoethylene cis-1,2-
Dichloroelhylene trans-1,2-
Oichlotoeihylenel,l-(Vinylidene chloride)
CTC = 0.7)
Dichloropbenol 2.4-
Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 2,4-(2,4-D)
(TC= 10)
Dichloropropane 1.2-
Dichlofopcopene l.Mmixtuieof isomers)
Diehloropropene cis-13-
Dlmethoaee (degrades to Methanol)
Dimethoxybenzidine 33*-
Dimethylphthalate (degrades to
Methanol)
Dimeihylbenz[a]anfflracene 7.12-
Dimcthylbenzidine 33'-
Dimethylphenol 2.4-
Dinitrobenzene 13-
Dinitropbenol 2.4-
Dinltroioluene 2.4- (TC = 0.13)
Dinitiotoluene 2.6-
Dioxane 1.4-
Oiphenylamine
Disulfcton
Endosulfan (Endosulfan I and Il.mixture)
Endrin(TC=0.02)
Epichlotohydrin
Eihoxyethonol 2-
Ethyl acetate
Ethyl ether
Ethyl methaoylaie
Ethyl mcthanesulfonate
Ethylbenzene
Ethylenc dibromide (1 ,2-Dibroraoethane)
Ethytenc thiourca
Fluoranthene
Ruofcoc
Fbnnaldehyde
Formic acid
Furan
HCH beta-
HCH (Lindane) gamma- (TC = 0.4)
(degrades to 1.2.4-Trichlorobenzene)
HCH alpha- (degrades to 1 ,2,4-
Trichlotobenzene)
Heptachlor(TC= 0.008)
Heptachlor cpoxide
Hej«ch!oro-13-buiadiene (TC = 0.5)
Hexachlorobenzene (TC = 0.1 3)
HexacWorocvcIopentadicne
Hexachloroethane (TC = 3.0)
Hcxachlorophene
Indenof 1 .23-cd Jpyrcne
Isobutyl alcohol
Isophorooe
Kcpone
Mclhacrylonitrilc
Methanol
CAS#
107062
156592
156605
75354
120832
94757
78875
542756
10061015
60515
119904
131113
57976
119937
10567S
9965C
51285
121142
606202
123911
122394
298044
115297
72208
106898
110805
141786
60297
97632
6250C
10041'
10693'
96457
20644C
86737
5000(
64186
11000!
319857
58899
319846
7644!
102457:
8768:
11874
7747'
6772
7030'
193395
7883
7859
14350
126987
6756
C?
c
NC
NC
C
NC
NC
C
<:
c
NC
C
NC
NC
C
NC
NC
NC
N<:
NC
c
NC:
NC
NC
NC
c
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
NC
C
C
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
NC
C
NC
C
NC
C
C
NC
NC
R
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.8
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.0
1.1
1.0
11606
1.9
1.5
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.0
6.3
3.3
10.4
107
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
3.7
1.1
1.0
114
22.6
1.0
1.0
1.0
8.2
7.7
8.2
432
212
77.7
686
141
11.8
267
4839
1.0
1.2
38.6
1.0
1.0
\
(yr-l)
0.0028
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.013
0.00
12
0.57
0.00
0.032
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.67
0.64
0.016
9.0
0.00
0.063
0.00
0.019
363
0.00
0.18
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.31
0.31
18
0.018
0.00
0.00
7.2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00012
0.00
MCL
(mg/L)
0.0050
0.070
0.10
0.0070
0.0050
0.0020
0.70
5.0E-05
2.0E-04
4.0E-04
2.0E-04
0.0010
0.050
HBN
(mg/L)
9.0E-04
0.40
0.70
l.OE-04
0.10
0.40
0.0010
5.0E-04
5.0E-04
0.0070
0.0060
400
3.0E-06
9.0E-06
0.70
0.0040
0.070
0.070
0.040
0.0080
0.90
0.0010
0.20
0.010
0.0090
10
30
7.0
3.0
3.0E-07
4.0
l.OE-06
2.0E-05
1.0
1.0
7.0
70
0.040
5.0E-05
7.0E-05
l.OE-05
2.0E-05
9.0E-06
0.0010
5.0E-05
0.30
0.0060
0.010
2.1E-04
10
0.090
2.0E-06
0.0040
20
No Liner/In-Situ Soil
DAF
1.8
1.5
1.5
1.7
1.5
1.5
2.2
1.7
220
1.7
2.8
1.1E+10
1.7
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.7
1.5
3.6E+06
5.5E+10
8.1E+04
1.5
4.1
1.5
2.3
1.5
15
1.7
1.7
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.7
3.0E+05
4.9E+05
2.9E+07
1.8
3.6
*
1.7
2.0
4.4E+04
1.5
1.7
1.8
1.5
1.5
LCTV
based on MCL
(mg/L)
0.0030
0.11
0.15
0.012
0.011
0.020
1.1
7.7E-04
0.11
0.11
0.0080
1000
0.0036
1000
LCTV
based on HBN
(mg/L)
6.0E-05
0.60
1.1
1.7E-04
0.15
0.60
0.0022
8.5E-04
1000
1.5
0.010
30
1000
1.5E-05
1.1
0.0060
0.11
0.11
0.060
0.014
1.4
1000
1000
0.020
1000
15
123
11
6.9
1000
6.0
1.5E-05
3.5E-05
1.7
1.5
11
105
0.060
8.5E-05
0.40
0.60
0.0080
265
0.0018
1.8E-04
1000
0.010
0.020
9.2
15
0.15
3.6E-06
0.0060
30
4/7/99
This table is based on a draft model and is for review purposes only.
LAU_GCB.xls
-------
LAU LCTV Table: Page 3
Common Name
Methoxychlor (TC = 10.0)
Methyl ethyl ketone (TC = 200)
Methyl isobutyl ketone
Methyl methacrylate (degrades to
Methanol)
Methyl parathion (degrades to
Methanol)
Methylcholanthrene 3-
Methylene bromide (Dibromomethane)
Methylene Chloride (Dichloromethane)
(degrades to Formaldehyde)
N-Nitroso-di-n-butylamine
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
N-Nitrosodiethylamine
N-Nitrosodimethylamine
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
N-Nitrosomethylethylamme
N-Nitrosopiperidine
N-NitrosopyrroIidine
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene (TC = 2.0)
Octamethyl pyrophosphoramide
Parathion (ethyl)
Pentachlorobenzene
Pentachloronitrobenzene (PCNB)
Pentachlorophenol (TC = 100)
Polychlorinated biphenyls (Aroclois)
Pronamide
Pyrene
Pyridine (TC = 5.0)
Safrole
Strychnine and salts
Styrene
TCDDioxin 2, 3, 7, 8-
Tetrachlorobenzene 1,2,4,5-
retrachloroethane 1,1,1,2- (degrades to
Trichloroethylene)
retrachloroethane 1,1,2,2- (degrades to
Trichloroethylene)
Tetrachloroethylene (TC = 0.7)
Tetrachlorophenol 2,3,4,6-
retiaethyl dithiopyrophosphate (Sulfotep)
Toluene
Toluenediamine 2,4-
Foluidine o-
roluidine p-
Foxaphene (chlorinated camphenes)
(TC = 0.5)
rribromomethane (Bromofonn)
rrichloro-l,2,2-trifluoro- ethane 1,1,2-
Trichlorobenzene 1,2,4-
Trichloroethane 1,1,1-
Trichloroethane 1,1,2- (degrades to 1,1-
Dichloroethylene)
Trichloroethylene (1,1 ,2-Trichloroethy lene)
(TC = 0.5)
Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)
Trichlorophenol 2,4,5- (TC = 400)
Trichlorophenol 2,4,6- (TC = 2.0)
CAS#
72435
78933
108101
80626
298000
56495
74953
75092
924163
621647
55185
62759
86306
10595956
100754
930552
91203
98953
152169
56382
608935
82688
87865
1336363
23950585
129000
110861
94597
57249
100425
1746016
95943
630206
79345
127184
58902
3689245
108883
95807
95534
106490
8001352
75252
76131
120821
71556
79005
79016
75694
95954
88062
C?
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
NC
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
C
C
NC
NC
NC
C
NC
NC
C
NC
C
C
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
C
C
C
C
NC
NC
NC
C
C
NC
NC
C
R
212
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.8
26587
1.0
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.8
1.0
1.0
1.0
4.4
1.1
1.0
4.8
654
100
4.1
4119
2.1
222
1.0
1.6
1.2
2.8
3348
52.1
2.4
1.3
1.4
1.6
9.6
1.7
1.0
1.0
1.0
55.3
1.3
3.5
25.2
1.4
1.1
1.3
1.3
3.3
1.5
X
(yr-i)
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.034
0.81
0.00
0.00
0.00029
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.80E-05
0.71
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.09E-05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0041
0.22
0.00
0.00
24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.020
0.00014
0.00
0.00
0.22
0.00080
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
MCL!
(mg/L)
0.040
0.0050
0.0010
5.0E-04
0.10
3.0E-08
0.0050
1.0
0.0030
0.10
0.070
0.20
0.0050
0.0050
HBN
(mg/L)
0.20
20
2.0
3.0
0.0090
3.0E-06
0.40
0.010
2.0E-05
l.OE-05
6.0E-07
2.0E-06
0.020
4.0E-06
2.0E-06
4.0E-05
1.0
0.020
0.070
0.20
0.030
3.0E-04
7.0E-04
l.OE-05
3.0
1.0
0.040
5.0E-04
0.010
7.0
6.0E-10
0.010
0.0030
4.0E-04
0.40
1.0
0.020
7.0
3.0E-05
4.0E-04
4.0E-04
8.0E-05
1000
0.40
0.0010
0.0080
10
4.0
0.0080
No Liner/In-Situ Soil
DAF
*
1.5
1.5
2.7
8.2E+04
2.6E+19
1.5
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.5
1.5
1.5
2.6E+07
3.4
1.8
1.7
6693
1.5
1.9
1.5
1.7
1.5
1.5
895
1.6
2.2
35
1.5
1.5
*
1.5
1.7
1.7
1.7
2200
1.7
1.5
1.5
42
1.8
1.7
1.5
1.5
1.7
LCTV
based on MCL
(mg/L)
10
0.0085
0.0017
3.3
0.15
2.7E-05
0.0085
0.0085
0.0075
1.5
0.50
0.17
0.11
8.4
0.0090
0.0085
LCTV
based on HBN
(mg/L)
10
30
3.0
8.1
30
1000
0.60
0.017
3.4E-05
1.7E-05
l.OE-06
3.4E-06
0.034
6.8E-06
3.4E-06
6.8E-05
1.5
0.030
0.11
1000
0.10
5.4E-04
0.0012
0.067
4.5
1.9
0.060
8.5E-04
0.015
11
5.4E-07
0.016
0.0066
0.014
0.60
1.5
1000
11
5.1E-05
6.8E-04
6.8E-04
0.18
1000
0.60
1.7E-04
0.014
15
6.0
0.014
4/7/99
This table is based on a draft model and is for review purposes only.
LAU_GCB.xls
-------
LAULCTV Table: Page 4
Common Name
rrichloK>phenoxy)propicmic acid 2-(2,4,5-
(Silvcx)(TCsl.O)
Trichlorophenoxyacetic add 2,4,5-
Trichlocopcopane 1.23-
rrinitrobenzcne, sym- (13.5-
rrinitrobenzenc)
rris(23-dibromoproByl)phosphate
Vinyl chloride (TC « 0.2)
Xylcncs (total)
Antimony
Arsenic CTCs 5.0)
Chromium (VI) (TC = S.O)
Mercury (TC = 02)
Selenium (TC= 1.0)
Thallium
Barium (TC = 100)
Beryllium
Cadmium (TC= 1.0)
Chromium Gil)
Copper
Lead (TC= 5.0)
Nickel
Silver(TCs5.0)
Vanadium
Zinc
CAS#
93721
93765
96184
99354
126727
75014
1330207
7440360
7440382
7440473
7439976
7782492
7440280
7440393
7440417
7440439
16065381
7440508
7439921
7440020
7440224
7440622
7440666
C?
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
NC
NC
NC
C
NC
NC
NC
NC
NC
C
NC
NC
NC
C
NC
NC
NC
NC
R
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.0
5.1
1.0
4.2
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
31
(yr-D
0.00
0.00
0.0050
0.00
0.027
0.00
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
MCL
(mg/L)
0.0020
10
0.006
0.05
0.1
0.002
0.05
0.002
2
0.005
0.1
HBN
(mg/L)
0.30
0.40
0.20
0.0020
9.0E-06
4.0E-05
70
0.014
5.68E-05
0.175
0.011
0.175
0.0040
40
1.0
0.015
0.20
0.30
10
No Liner/In-Situ Soil
DAF
1.5
1.5
1.7
1.5
15
1.5
1.5
89
67
45
34
11
155
LCTV
based on MCL
(mg/L)
0.0030
15
0.54
3.3
4.5
0.068
0.56
0.31
8.0
0.11
1.7
LCTV
based on HBN
(mg/L)
0.45
0.60
0.34
0.0030
1.4E-04
6.0E-05
105
1.2
0.0038
5.0
0.20
1.0
0.022
1000
36
5
1.0
35
124
4/7/99
This table is based on a draft model and is for review purposes only.
LAU_GCB.xls
-------
DESIGNING AND INSTALLING LINERS SECTION
APPENDIX
Technical Considerations for Surface Impoundments,
Landfills, and Waste Piles
-------
Designing and. Installing liners Section—Appendices
Appendix i: Materials Commonly Used as Alternatives to
Soil in Waste Management Unit Designs
Alternative materials typically refer to geosynthetics, which include geotextiles, geogrids,
geonets, geomembranes, geosynthetic day liners, and geocomposites. Geosynthetics are typically
incorporated into liner designs to perform one or more of five major functions including separa-
tion, reinforcement, nitration, drainage, and liquid barrier. For almost all geosynthetics, some of
the construction properties to be concerned with include installation damage, stress cracking, and
degradation, as a result of temperature, chemical interaction, or ultraviolet radiation.
Since geomembranes and geosynthetic day liners are described in detail earlier in the section on
liner types, they are not included in this appendix. The remaining four materials, geotextiles,
geogrids, geonets, and geocomposites, and their functions, are described briefly below.
Geotextiles. Geotextiles refer to a permeable layer comprised of textile material, often available
as a nonwoven fabric, a knitted fabric, or a woven fabric. Since the fabric is a synthetic material
and not a natural fiber, such as cotton or wool, biodegradation is not a major concern. However,
other physical properties that may need to be specified for a manufacturer include specific gravity,
mass per unit area, thickness, and stiffness. Additionally, designers using geotextiles should con-
sider how the geotextile behaves with respect to tensile stresses, including properties such as com-
pressibility, tensile strength, seam strength, fatigue strength, and tear and puncture resistance.
Geoiextiles may be used to perform any of the five functions, depending on the type of geotextile
selected.
Geogrids. Geogrids are plastic pieces manufactured into an open, gridlike configuration and are
typically used as reinforcement. They are designed with apertures or openings sized to allow strike
through of surrounding rock and soil. Typical opening sizes range from 1 to 10 cm (0.5 to 4 in.).
Some of the design properties to be concerned with for geogrids include single rib and junction or
node strength, wide width tensile strength, shear strength, and anchorage strength.
Geonets. Geonets consist of integrally connected parallel sets of plastic ribs overlying similar sets
at various angles. Geonets are typically used as part of a drainage system. Some of the design con-
siderations for geonets indude tensile strength, compressive strength, intrinsic shear strength, and
hydraulic properties induding planar flow, also known as transmissivity.
Geocomposites. Geocomposites are manufactured products consisting of two or more types of
geosynthetics, such as geonets, geogrids, geotextiles, or geomembranes, produced in either laminat-
ed or composite form. Owners and operators will be concerned with different design considera-
tions depending on which types of geosynthetic materials are combined to make the geocomposite.
A7B-2
-------
DESIGNING A LAND APPLICATION PROGRAM
APPENDICES
-------
Designing a Land Application Program—Appendices
I— Appendix I: State Cooperative Agricultural Extension Services
ALABAMA
Alabama Cooperative Extension System
109-D Duncan Hall
Auburn University, AL 36849
Phone: 334 844-4444
E-mail: sjones@acesag.aubum.edu
Internet:
ALASKA
Alaska Cooperative Extension
University of Alaska Fairbanks
Arctic Health Research Building
PO Box 756180
Fairbanks, AK 99775
Phone:"907 474-7246 Fax: 907 474-6567
E-mail: f!hdh@aurora.alaska.edu
Internet:
ARIZONA
Arizona Cooperative Extension Service
301 Forbes Building
Tucson, AZ 85721
Phone: 602 621-7209 Fax: 602 621-1314
E-mail: jim.c@ag.arizona.edu
Internet: na.edu/ext/coopexLhtml>
ARKANSAS
University of Arkansas Cooperative
Extension Service
P.O. Box 391
Little Rock, AR 72203
Phone: 501 671-2117 Fax: 501 671-2121
E-mail: lsmith@uaex.edu
Internet:
CALIFORNIA
University of California Cooperative
Extension
Internet:
When contacting in person, by mail, or by
phone/fax, contact regional offices.
CALIFORNIA, NORTHERN REGION
University of California Cooperative
Extension
DANR Building
Hopkins Road
Davis, CA 95616
Phone: 916 754-8491 Fax: 916 754-8499
Internet:
CALIFORNIA, NORTH CENTRAL REGION
University of California
DANR Services Building
Hopkins Road
Davis, CA 95616
Phone: 916 754-8509 Fax: 916 754-8540
Internet:
CALIFORNIA, SOUTH REGION
University of California
Division of Agriculture and Natural
Resources, Southern Region
University of California, Riverside
Riverside, CA 92521
Phone: 909 787-3321
Internet:
CALIFORNIA, SOUTH CENTRAL REGION
University of California
Kearney Agricultural Center
9240 S. Riverbend Avenue
Parlier, CA 93648
Phone: 209 646-6500 Fax: 206 646-6513
E-mail: ccrabb@uckac.edu
Internet:
A7C-2
-------
Designing a Tand Application Program—Appendices
Appendix I: State Cooperative Agricultural Extension Services
(cont.)
COLORADO
Colorado State University Cooperative
Extension
1 Administration Building
Colorado State University
Fort Collins, CO 80523
Phone: 970 491-6281 Fax: 970 491-6208
E-mail: mrewerts@vines.colostate.edu
Internet:
CONNECTICUT
Cooperative Extension System
205 Young Building
1376 Storrs Road
Storrs, CT 6269
Phone: 860 486-6271 Fax: 860 486-4128
Internet:
DELAWARE
Delaware Cooperative Extension
Townsend Hall
University of Delaware
Newark, DE 19717
Phone: 302 831-2501
E-mail: nye@udel.edu
Internet:
FLORIDA
Florida Cooperative Extension Servcie
Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences
University of Florida
Gainesville, FL 32611
Internet: <^ww.ifas.ulLedu/www/agator/
htm/ces.htrn>
GEORGIA
University of Georgia Cooperative Extension
Service
Hoke Smith Building
The University of Georgia
Athens, GA 30602
Phone: 706 542-3824 Fax: 706 542-8815
Internet:
HAWAH
University of Hawaii
College of Tropical Agriculture and Human
Resources
Gilmore 202
3050 Maile Way
Honolulu, HI 96822
Phone: 808 956-8234 Fax: 808 956-9105
Internet:
IDAHO
University of Idaho Cooperative Extension
System
Agricultural Sciences Building, Room 51
Moscow, ID 83844
Phone: 208 885-6639 Fax: 208 885-6654
E-mail: extdir@uidaho.edu
Internet:
ILLINOIS
Illinois Cooperative Extension Service
338 Agricultural Engineering Sciences
Building
1304 W Pennsylvania Avenue
Urbana, IL 61801
Phone: 217 333-3570 Fax: 217 244-0323
E-mail: age@uiuc.edu
Internet:
INDIANA
Purdue University Cooperative Extension
Service
1140 AGAD Building
West Lafayette, IN 47907
Phone: 765 494-8489 Fax: 765 494-5876
E-mail: Henry_Wadsworth@ces.purdue.edu
Internet:
A7C-3
-------
Designing a Tar^ Application Program:—Appendices
I— Appendix I: State Cooperative Agricultural Extension Services
(cont.)
IOWA
Iowa State University Extension
15 BDSHR
Ames, IA 50011
Phone: 515 294-6192 Fax: 515 294-9781
E-mail: vpforext@exnet.iastate.edu
Internet:
KANSAS
Kansas State University Research and
Extension
114 Waters Hall
Manhattan, KS 66506
Phone: 913 532-6147
E-mail: mjohnson@oz.oznet.ksu.edu
Internet:
KENTUCKY
University of Kentucky University
Extension
Frazee Hall
University of Kentucky
Lexington, KY 40506
Phone: 800 432-0963
Internet:
LOUISIANA
Louisiana Cooperative Extension Service
Knapp Hall
P.O. Box 25100
Baton Rouge, LA 70894
Phone: 504 388-4141 Fax: 504 388-2467
Internet: <13039.57.11/wwwac/lces.html>
MAINE
University of Maine Cooperative Extension
102 Libby Hall
Orono, ME 4469
Phone: 800 287-0274 Fax: 207 581-1387
E-mail: lbartel@umce.umext.maine.edu
Internet:
MARYLAND
University of Maryland Extension Service
UMES Cooperative Extension Programs
2122 The Richard A. Henson Center
Princess Anne, MD 21853
Phone:410651-6206 Fax:410651-6207
E-mail: hbrooks@umes-bird.umd.edu
Internet:
MASSACHUSETTS
University of Massachusetts Extension
Program
Stockbridge Hall, Box 3723C
University of Massachusetts
Amherst, MA 1003
Phone: 413 545-2766 Fax: 413 545-1242
E-mail: umext@umext.umass.edu
Internet:
MICHIGAN
Michigan State University Extension
108 Agriculture-Hall
East Lansing, MI 48824
Phone: 517 355-2308 Fax: 517 355-6473
E-mail: msue@msue.msu.edu
Internet:
MINNESOTA
Minnesota Extension Service
University of Minnesota
240 Coffey Hall, 1420 Eckles Ave.
St. Paul, MN 55108
Phone: 612 624-1222 Fax: 612 625-6227
E-mail: info@mes.umn.edu
Internet:
MISSISSIPPI
Mississippi Cooperative Extension Service
201 Bost Extension Center
Mississippi State, MS 39762
Phone: 601 325-3036 Fax: 601 325-8407
E-mail: brown@ces.msstate.edu
Internet:
A7C-4
-------
Designing a land Application Program—Appendices
Appendix I: State Cooperative Agricultural Extension Services
(cont.)
MISSOURI
University of Missouri Extension
309 University Hall
Columbia, MO 65211
Phone: 573 882-7754
E-mail: tumerr@ext.missouri.edu
Internet:
MONTANA
University of Montana Extension Service
P.O. Box 172560
Bozeman, MT 59717
Phone: 406 994-4371
Intemet:
NEBRASKA
University of Nebraska Cooperative
Extension
211 Agricultural Hall
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Lincoln, NE 68583
Phone: 402 472-2966
E-mail: coex005@unlvm.unl.edu
Internet:
NEVADA
Nevada Agricultural Experiment Station
University of Nevada, Reno
Director's Office/221
Reno, NV 89557
Phone: 702 784-1610 Fax: 702 784-6604
E-mail: robbins@fs.scs.unr.edu
Internet:
NEW HAMPSHIRE
University of NH Cooperative Extension
59 College Road
Taylor Hall
Durham, NH 3824
Phone: 603 862-1520 Fax: 603 862-1585
Internet:
NEW JERSEY
Rutgers Cooperative Extension
Cook College
P.O. Box 231
New Brunswick, NJ 8903
Phone: 908 932-9306 Fax: 908 932-6633
E-mail: rceinfo@aesop.rutgers.edu
Internet:
NEW MEXICO
Cooperative Extension Service
Gerald Thomas Hall, Room 220
New Mexico State University
Box 30003, Dept. 3AE
Las Graces, NM 88003
Phone: 505 646-3015
E-mail: jschicke@nmsu.edu
Internet:
NEWYORK
Cornell Cooperative Extension
276 Roberts Hall
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY 14853
Phone: 607 255-2237 Fax: 607 255-2473
E-mail: cedir@cce.comell.edu
Internet:
NORTH CAROLINA
Cooperative Extension Service
112 Patterson, Box 7601
North Carolina State University
Raleigh, NC 27695
Phone:919515-2811 Fax:919515-6980
E-mail: durward_bateman@ncsu.edu
Internet:
NORTH DAKOTA
North Dakota State University Extension
Service
MorrillHall315
North Dakota State University
Fargo, ND 58105
Phone: 701 231-8944 Fax: 701 231-8520
E-mail: ext-dir@ndsuext.nodak.edu
Internet:
A7C-5
-------
Designing a IsnA Application Program.—Appendices
Appendix I: State Cooperative Agricultural Extension Services
(cont.)
OHIO
Ohio State University Extension
3 Agricultural Administration Building
2120 Fyffe Road
Columbus, OH 43210
Phone:614292-6181
E-mail: smith@agvax2.ag.ohio-state.edu
Internet:
OKLAHOMA
Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service
Oklahoma State University
139 Agricultural Hall
Stillwater, OK 74078
Phone: 405 744-5398 Fax: 405 744-5339
E-mail: raycam@okway.okstate.edu
Internet: «dnibba.ucc.okstate.edu/osuu.ag/oces>
OREGON
Oregon State University Extension Service
Oregon State University
422 Kerr Administration Building
Corvallis,OR 97331
Phone: 541 737-0804
Internet:
PENNSYLVANIA
Cooperative Extension Service
201 Agricultural Administration Building
The Pennsylvania State University
University Park, PA 16802
Fax:814865-3103
E-mail: oce@psU.edu
Internet:
RHODE ISLAND
University of Rhode Island Cooperative
Extension Service
9 East Alumni Avenue, Suite 5
Kingston, RI 02881
Internet:
SOUTH CAROLINA
Clemson University Cooperative Extension
Service
103 Barre Hall
Clemson University
Clemson, SC 29634
Phone: 864 656-3382 Fax: 864 656-0765
Internet:
TENNESSEE
University of Tennessee Extension Service
The University of Tennessee
P.O. Box 1071
Knoxville, IN 37901
Phone:423974-7114
Internet:
TEXAS
Texas Agricultural Extension Service
104 Administration
College Station, TX 77843
Phone: 409 845-7800 Fax: 409 845-9542
Internet:
UTAH
Utah State University Extension
Utah State University
Logan, UT 84322
Phone: 801 797-2201
E-mail: bobg@ext.usu.edu
Internet:
A7C-6
-------
Designing a Land Application. Program^rAppendices
Appendix I: State Cooperative Agricultural Extension Services
(cont.)
VERMONT
University of Vermont Extension
601 Main Street
University of Vermont
Burlington, VT 5401
Phone: 802 656-2980 Fax: 802 656-8642
E-mail: lforcier@zoo.uvm.edu
Internet:
VIRGINIA
Virginia Cooperative Extension
104 Hutcheson
Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State
University
Blacksburg, VA 24061
Phone: 540 001-5299
Internet:
WASHINGTON
Washington State University Cooperative
Extension
College of Agriculture and Home
Economics
Washington State University
Pullman, WA 99164
Phone: 509 335-4561
Internet:
WEST VIRGINIA
West Virginia University Extension Service
West Virginia University
Room 817 Knapp Hall, P.O. Box 6031
Morgantown, WV 26506
Phone: 304 293-5691 Fax: 304 293-7163
E-mail: lcote@wvu.edu
Internet:
WISCONSIN
University of Wisconsin Cooperative
Extension
601 Extension Building
432 N. Lake Street
Madison, WI 53706
Phone: 608 263-5110
Internet:
WYOMING
University of Wyoming Cooperative
Extension Servcie
P.O. Box 3354
Laramie, WY 82071
Phone: 307 766-5124 Fax: 307 766-3998
Internet:
A7C-7
-------
-------
OPERATING THE WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
APPENDICES
-------
-------
EPA/625/R-97/003
October 1997
ISO 14000 Resource Directory
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Research and Development
National Risk Management Research Laboratory
Center for Environmental Research Information
Cincinnati, Ohio
-------
DISCI-AIMER
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through its Office of Research and Development
funded and managed the research described here under Contract #68-3-0315 to Eastern Research
Group, Inc. It has been subjected to the Agency's peer and administrative review and has been
approved for publication as an EPA document. Mention of trade names or commercial products
does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
IV
-------
FOREWORD
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is charged by Congress with protecting the Nation's land,
air, and water resources. Under a mandate of national environmental laws, the Agency strives to
formulate and implement actions leading to a compatible balance between human activities and the
ability of natural systems to support and nurture life. To meet this mandate, EPA's research program
is providing data and technical support for solving environmental problems today and building a
science knowledge base necessary to manage our ecological resources wisely, understand how
pollutants affect our health, and prevent or reduce environmental risks in the future.
The National Risk Management Research Laboratory is the Agency's center for investigation of
technological and management approaches for reducing risks from threats to human health and the
environment. The focus of the Laboratory's research program is on methods for the prevention and
control of pollution to air, land, water and subsurface resources; protection of water quality in public
water systems; remediation of contaminated sites and ground water; and prevention and control of
indoor air pollution. The goal of this research effort is to catalyze development and implementation
of innovative, cost-effective environmental technologies; develop scientific and engineering
information needed by EPA to support regulatory and policy implementation of environmental
regulations and strategies.
This publication has been produced as part of the Laboratory's strategic long-term research plan. It
is published and made available by EPA's Office of Research and Development to assist the user
community and to link researchers with their clients. This publication was developed jointly with the
USEPA Standards Network, Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances.
This report, ISO 14000 Resource Directory, funded through the Center for Environmental Research
Information, is a pollution prevention guide for government and nonprofit initiatives and projects
related to the developing ISO 14000 series of Environmental Management Standards.
E. Timothy Oppelt, Director
National Risk Management Research Laboratory
-------
This Directory provides information about current initiatives related to the developing ISO 14000
series of environmental standards. Interest in the standards among governments, nongovernmental
organizations, industry and the public is high and expected to grow as the standards become
finalized. A measure of this interest is the fact that even before the first of the ISO 14000 series
standards was issued, over 100 government and nonprofit organizations submitted information for
inclusion in this Directory. This number excludes the hundreds of private sector initiatives, not
included in this Directory, that are also underway. The U.S. Technical Advisory Group (TAG) to
ISO Technical Committee 207 (the ISO Committee developing the ISO 14000 series standards),
for example, consists of hundreds of members from industry, government, consulting firms,
nongovernmental organizations, and academia. Dozens of private sector organizations have
emerged to offer training, consulting, and other services related to ISO 14000, while hundreds of
individual companies are investigating ISO 14000 to determine its implications.
The ISO 14000 is a global series of standards developed outside regulatory channels that has the
potential to revolutionize both the way industrial and other organizations manage environmental
affairs, the way regulatory agencies relate to the regulated community, and the way customers and
society at large relate to companies and other organizations. Whether this potential will be
realized is not yet clear. Much will depend on how industry, governments, and nongovernmental
organizations respond to, and use, the standards. If their potential is realized, the introduction of
the ISO 14000 series standards could be one of the most significant environmental developments
of our time.
This Directory is an effort by EPA to contribute to an understanding of the ISO 14000 series
standards. It does not attempt to promote or discourage use of the standards. Rather, it is
intended to facilitate communication among the many groups or individuals examining or using
the standards. A useful first step in improving our understanding of the standards is to provide a
forum where interested parties can communicate and learn from each others' experience.
The audience for this resource directory is anyone interested in the ISO 14000 series of
International Environmental Standards. Companies from large to small and government at all
levels could find the information contained in this directory useful.
This report was submitted in fulfillment of Contract #68-3-0315 by Eastern Research Group, Inc.
under the sponsorship of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. This report covers a period
from January, 1997 to May 31,1997.
vi
-------
Table of Contents
1. Introduction l_l
2. U.S. EPA Initiatives
Agency-wide Initiatives 2-1
Headquarters Initiatives 2-3
Regional Initiatives and Support 2-9
3. Other Federal Initiatives
Department of Commerce 3-1
Department of Defense 3.2
Department of Energy 3.4
Department of State 3.5
Food and Drug Administration 3.7
Federal Trade Commission 3.7
U.S. Postal Service 3_8
4. State Initiatives
Alphabetical Listings by State 4-1
5. Nonprofit Initiatives
Industry Associations 5-1
Nongovernmental Organizations (NGOs) 5.3
Academic 5.7
6. International Initiatives
Multilateral Organizations 6-1
Alphabetical Listings by Country 5.3
7. Resources
U.S. National Standards 7-1
International Standards 7-1
Accreditation 7_1
Training , 7_2
Clearinghouses 7-2
Publications 7_2
Internet Resources 7-2
-------
NOTICE
The purpose of this Directory is to provide information on government activities concerning ISO
14000 and/or Environmental Management Systems (EMS). It is therefore beyond the scope of the
Directory to include a comprehensive listing of all the private sector organizations and initiatives
also involved in ISO 14000 and/or EMS.
The ISO 14000 series of standards are copyrighted and can be obtained by contacting any of the
following organizations: ANSI, 7315 Wisconsin Ave., Suite 250-E Bethesda, MD 20814. Tel:
301-469-3363. ASTM, 100 Bar Harbor Dr., West Conshohocken, PA 19428. Tel: 601-832-
9721. Fax: 601-832-9666. ASQC, 611 East Wisconsin Ave., P.O. Box 3005, Milwaukee, WI
53201. Tel: 800-248-1946. Fax:414-272-1734. NSF International, 2100 Commonwealth
Blvd., Ann Arbor, MI48105. Tel: 313-332-7333. Fax:313-669-0196.
VI
-------
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This Directory was prepared under the direction and coordination of Emma Lou George of the
U.S. EPA's Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research
Laboratory in Cincinnati, Ohio, with assistance from Mary McKiel of the EPA Standards
Network, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, in Washington, DC.
Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG) of Lexington, Massachusetts, collected and compiled the
information contained in the Directory, and prepared and edited the material for publication.
Michael Cronin and Donald Fried-Tanzer, under the direction of Jeff Cantin, were the primary
ERG contributors to its development.
Vll
-------
-------
INTRODUCTION
-------
-------
Overview
This Directory provides information about
current initiatives related to the developing ISO
14000 series of environmental standards. Interest
in the standards among governments,
nongovernmental organizations, industry and the
public is high and expected to grow as the
standards become finalized. A measure of this
interest is the fact that even before the first of the
ISO 14000 series standards was issued, over 100
government and nonprofit organizations
submitted information for inclusion in this
Directory. This number excludes the hundreds
of private sector initiatives, not included in this
Directory, that are also underway. The U.S.
Technical Advisory Group (TAG) to ISO
Technical Committee 207 (the ISO Committee
developing the ISO 14000 series standards), for
example, consists of hundreds of members from
industry, government, consulting firms,
nongovernmental organizations, and academia
(see Rgure 2). Dozens of private sector
organizations have emerged to offer training,
consulting, and other services related to ISO
14000, while hundreds of individual companies
are investigating ISO 14000 to determine its
implications. At least two U.S. companies
certified to ISO 14001 while the standard was
still in draft form, and prior to the existence of
U.S. nationally accredited registrars.
The reasons for this interest in the ISO 14000
series standards are not hard to find. It is a
global series of standards developed outside
regulatory channels that has the potential to
revolutionize both the way industrial and other
organizations manage environmental affairs, the
way regulatory agencies relate to the regulated
community, and the way customers and society
at large relate to companies and other
organizations. Whether this potential will be
realized is not yet clear. Much will depend on
how industry, governments, and
nongovernmental organizations respond to, and
use, the standards. If their potential is realized,
the introduction of the ISO 14000 series
standards could be one of the most significant
environmental developments of our time.
This Directory is an effort by EPA to contribute
to an understanding of the ISO 14000 series
standards. It does not attempt to promote or •
discourage use of the standards. Rather, it is
intended to facilitate communication among the
many groups or individuals examining or using
the standards. A useful first step in improving
our understanding of the standards is to provide
a forum where interested parties can
communicate and learn from each others'
experience.
What is ISO?
The International Organization for
Standardization (ISO) is a private sector,
international standards body based in Geneva,
Switzerland. The short form "ISO" is not an
acronym, but instead is derived from the Greek
isos, meaning "equal" (implying "standard").
Founded in 1947, ISO promotes the international
harmonization and development of
manufacturing, product and communications
standards. ISO has promulgated more than
8,000 internationally accepted standards
covering everything from paper sizes to film
speeds. More than 120 countries belong to ISO
as full voting members, while several other
countries serve as observer members. The
United States is a full voting member and is
officially represented by the American National
Standards Institute (ANSI), a nongovernmental,
nonprofit standards setting organization.
ISO produces internationally harmonized
standards through a structure of Technical
Committees (TCs). The TCs usually divide into
Subcommittees (SC), which are further
subdivided in Working Groups (WG) where the
actual standards writing occurs. For example,
ISO TC 207 is the ISO Committee developing
the ISO 14000 series of standards, SCI pertains
to Environmental Management Systems (EMS),
and SCI WG1 produced the ISO 14001 standard
(Figure 1 shows the structure of ISO TC 207).
1-1
-------
International Organization for Standardization (ISO)
Geneva, Switzerland
Tel: 41-22-748-0111
Fax:41-22-733-3430
http://133.82.181.177/llwda/lSO/hoine.html
Technical Committee (TC) 207: Environmental Management
Secretariat Canada
Chair: Dr. Margaret Kerr
Secretary: James L. Dbton
T«l: 416-747-4103
Subcommittee 2:
Environmental
Auditing and
Related
Environmental
Investigation*
Secretariat:
the Netherlands
Netherlands
Normallsttc Institute
Subcommittees:
Environmental
Labeling
Secretariat
Australia
Standards Australia
WOZ-Audtki
Ojllfcdbnt
W(M-0«w
Subcommittee 4:
Environmental
Performance
Evaluation
Secretariat:
United States
American National
Standards Institute
Print*** for
PltOHixarP
WOi-Str-DMfenHon
EattaiBKltil
Ub*lns Programs
Subcommittees:
LHe-Cyde
Assessment
Secretariat
France
Association
Francalse do
Normalisation
WO1-Q«n«tfc
Eo»tronmwt«l
PMfonwno*
Enfatifan
Subcommittee 6:
Terms and
Definitions
Secretariat
Norway
Norges
Standardlserlngsfor
bund
WO1-LCA Qmrnl PrindplM Kd
PioMdun*
WOZ-Uh-Cyol* tovMtoiy Aiulytk
WOMJft Cycta lMMbny Aulyili
WO4-U»Cyd> Inpwl AiM**m«il
W05-U«-Cyol> InpranniMt
A»M«sreMt
Working Group 1:
Environmental Aspects In Product
Standards
Convener: Germany
Deutsche Institute fur Normung
Working Group on Forestry
Chairman:
Ken Shirley
New Zealand Forest
Owner's Association
FIgum 1. Structure of/SO Technical Committee 207.
1-2
-------
Figure 2. U.S. Technical Advisory Group (TAG) to ISO TC-207
American National Standards Institute 212-642-4900
US TAG to ISO/TC 207
Chair: Joe Cascio 703 750 6401
jcascio @ gnet.org
Vice-Chair: Mary McKiel 202-260-3584
mckiel.mary@epamail.epa.gov
ST1 — Environmental Management Systems
Chair: Joel Charm 201-455-4057
joel.charm@ alliedsignal.com
EPA Rep: Jim Home 202-260-5802
horne.james@epamail.epa.govl
ST2 — Environmental Auditing
Chair: Cornelius (Bud) Smith
203-778-6114
203-778-6487 Fax
EPA Rep: Cheryl Wasserman 202-260-8797
wasserman.cheryl @ epamail.epa.gov
ST3 — Environmental Labeling
Chair: Jim Connaughton 202-736-8364
jconnaugh@sidley.com
EPA Rep: Julie Lynch 202-260-4000
lynch.julie@epamail.epa.gov
ST4 — Environmental Performance Evaluation
Chair: John Master 610-359-4810
610-359-4862 Fax
EPA Rep: John Harman 202-260-6395
harman.john@epamail.epa.gov
ST5 — Life Cycle Assessment
Chair: James Fava 610-701-3636
f avaj @ wcpost2.rfweston.com
EPA Rep: Mary Ann Curran 5 13-569-7837
curran.maryann@epamail.epa.gov
ST6— Terms and Definitions
Chair: Christopher Bell 202-736-8 118
cbell@sidley.com
EPA Rep: Mary McKiel 202-260-3584
mckieLmary @ epamail.epa.gov
SWG — Environmental Aspects in Product Standards
Chair: Stanley Rhodes 5 10-832-1415
EPA Rep: John Shoaff 202-260-1 83 1
shoaff.john@epamail.epa.gov
For information on joining the U.S. TAG, contact ASTM at 610-832-9721.
1-3
-------
What are the ISO 14000
Series Standards?
The ISO 14000 standards are a series of
voluntary standards developed under the ISO
framework to address organizational
environmental management. Like the ISO 9000
series quality standards on which they are largely
modeled, the ISO 14000 series standards focus
on management systems rather than on
performance levels. Just as it is impossible to
define "quality" across a wide range of products,
it is difficult to define environmental
performance across a wide range of activities,
products, and services, as well as across
differing national regulatory systems. The ISO
14000 series standards do not address the issue
of performance. Instead, they identify
management system elements that are intended
to lead to improved performance: a method to
identify significant environmental aspects; a
policy that includes a commitment to regulatory
compliance, the prevention of pollution and
continual improvement; environmental
objectives and targets for all relevant levels and
functions in the organization; procedures to
ensure performance, as well as compliance
procedures to monitor and measure performance;
and a systematic management review process.
One of the issues regulatory agencies and
stakeholders must consider is how these systems'
conformance requirements will interact with
regulatory performance requirements.
The ISO 14000 series of standards include
"specification" standard, ISO 14001. The rest
are guidance standards which provide optional
guidance for companies developing and
implementing management systems and product
standards. The ISO 14001 specification
standard "contains only those requirements that
may be objectively audited for
certification/registration purposes and/or self
declaration purposes." The various standards
are at different stages of development from
published final International Standards (IS) to
New Work Item (NWT) Proposals (see Figure 3).
ISO 14001,14004,14010,14011/1 and 14012
are published final International Standards. For
the developing status of the other documents it is
best to consult one of the many newsletters or
Internet websites which track this information
(please see Chapter 7, Resources).
The ISO 14000 series of standards are
copyrighted and can be obtained by contacting
any of the following organizations: ANSI, 7315
Wisconsin Ave., Suite 250-E, Bethesda, MD
20814, Tel: 301-469-3363. ASTM, 100 Bar
Harbor Dr., West Conshohocken, PA, 19428,
Tel: 610-832-9721, Fax: 610-832-9666. ASQC,
611 East Wisconsin Ave., P.O. Box 3005,
Milwaukee, WI53201, Tel: 800-248-1946, Fax:
414-272-1734. NSF International, 2100
Commonwealth Blvd., Ann Arbor, MI 48105,
Tel: 313-332-7333, Fax: 313-669-0196.
Initiatives Described in this
Resource Directory
Application and acceptance of the ISO 14000
standards are still evolving, therefore very few
initiatives described in this Resource Directory
are tightly tied to the ISO standards themselves.
Organizations are not waiting, however, for all
the various standards to be finalized. Instead,
they are initiating a wide range of projects
revolving around the major themes addressed in
the ISO 14000 series standards: environmental
management systems, product and process life
cycles, extended producer responsibility, moving
beyond compliance, environmental performance
evaluation, third party certification, etc. For the
purposes of this Resource Directory the
definition of an "ISO 14000 Initiative" includes
both projects related formally to the ISO 14000
series standards and those more loosely related
to some of the major themes of the standards.
With this scope identified, a wide variety of
organizations were invited to submit information
about initiatives that would be of interest to
others tracking ISO 14000. The purpose of this
Directory is to provide information on
government activities concerning ISO 14000
and/or Environmental Management Systems
(EMS). It is therefore beyond the scope of the
Directory to include a comprehensive listing of
all the private sector organizations and initiatives
also involved in ISO 14000 and/or EMS. Each
1-4
-------
entry includes a description of the initiative
and provides the name, address and telephone
number of a contact person who is prepared to
discuss the results of their exploration with
others examining or using the standards. Where
possible, e-mail addresses and Universal
Resource Locators, or URLs addresses (World
Wide Web), have also been provided to facilitate
electronic communication. This Resource
Directory will also be available for download in
*.pdf format online at:
httpy/www.epa.gov/ttbnrmrl/ceri.htm and in the
near future will be interactive to allow users to
access these resources directly through the
Internet.
EPA's Involvement with ISO
14000
ISO 14000 is a voluntary, private sector
initiative that EPA views has the potential to
achieve environmental benefits. EPA has been
involved in the development of the standards
since their inception. EPA's Mary McKiel is the
Vice Chairman of the U.S. Technical Advisory
Group (TAG) to ISO Technical Committee 207.
Moreover, EPA is represented on the
Chairman's
Advisory Group and on the U.S. National
Accreditation Program for environmental
management systems standards (ISO 14001).
The chief mechanism for organizing EPA's
involvement with ISO 14000 is the Voluntary
Standards Network.
The Voluntary Standards Network was
established by Administrator Carol Browner in
1993 to address international voluntary
standards activities. A primary focus of the
Network has been to coordinate the Agency's
participation in the development of the ISO
14000 standards for environmental management
This coordination helps ensure that the Agency
speaks with one voice on important issues and
activities as they pertain to voluntary standards,
such as the ISO 14000 series.
Key EPA activities to date have included:
Providing an information clearinghouse.
EPA activities such as this Directory are
intended to inform the regulatory
community, stakeholder groups, and other
interested parties (including industry) of key
activities taking place both within the ISO
setting, and among government agencies and
nonprofit organizations.
Evaluating the potential usefulness of ISO
14000 in a regulatory setting. A number of
projects are underway to evaluate whether
and how the ISO 14000 series standards
interact with regulatory requirements.
Numerous legal and practical issues remain
to be resolved in evaluating ISO 14000 as a
complement to regulatory programs. These
issues are being addressed in pilot projects
that will provide useful lessons for future
programs.
Assisting small and mid-sized companies.
A key issue facing small and mid-sized
companies will be how to adapt to the
requirements of ISO 14000 with fewer
resources than those available to the large
multinational companies that participated
heavily in the development of standards.
Organizing conferences. EPA
Headquarters held a one-day conference on
ISO 14000 in February, 1997 in
Washington, DC. The conference provided
an overview of the ISO 14000 standards,
and included presentations from EPA offices
involved in standards development and pilot
projects.
Other Initiatives Related to
ISO 14000
— As illustrated in this Resource Directory,
other government agencies, state
governments, and nonprofit organizations
are involved in a number of significant
initiatives related to ISO 14000. Included
are:
1-5
-------
— Work groups and study groups established
by federal agencies, states, and multilateral
organizations to evaluate the potential role
of ISO 14000 in regulatory and
nonregulatory programs.
— Initiatives by various departments of the
federal government and the U.S. Postal
Service to use ISO 14000 in facilities
management
— Inclusion of ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 by the
Food and Drug Administration in
environmental management system
registration.
— Development of tools for ISO 14000 by the
National Institute of Science and
Technology (NIST) Manufacturing
Extension Programs (MEP) which provide
technical assistance to small and medium
sized enterprises (SMEs).
— Programs hi over 28 states to include, or to
consider ISO 14001, as part of innovative
environmental management programs.
— Industry and trade association programs to
acquaint their members with ISO 14000.
How To Use This Resource
Directory
This Resource Directory is Intended principally
as a forum for users and interested parties to
learn about ISO 14000, to find out who is
involved in ISO 14000-related initiatives, and to
communicate with one another. The Directory
contains information primarily on initiatives
being developed by government and nonprofit
organizations. Other organizations are
developing useful directories of resources and
initiatives in the for-profit sector (see Chapter 7,
Resources). It is important to recognize,
therefore, that in addition to the resources listed
in this Directory, there exist numerous other
directories, newsletters, and other publications
related to ISO 14000, as well as a wide range of
private organizations that organize conferences,
provide training programs, and assist with
implementation of ISO 14000.
EPA hopes that the audience for this Resource
Directory will be able to use it in a number of
ways:
— Review the Directory from beginning to end
to get an idea of the breadth and scope of
initiatives currently underway.
— Reference the sections that include
organizations you work with to see what
initiatives are underway and learn how they
may affect you.
— Find out about initiatives underway in your
local area by referencing the state-by-state or
regional EPA listings.
— Look up organizations similar to yours to
find out what they are doing and learn from
their progress to date.
Reference the online version of this directory at
EPA's Technology Transfer webpage:
http://www.epa.gov/ttbiUTnrl/ceri.htm (to be in
place in early 1998) and use the search engine to
find entries by keyword.
Acronyms and Abbreviations
Used in this Resource
Directory
EMS
E-mail
ISO
P2
SME
Environmental Management
Systems
Electronic Mail
International Organization for
Standardization
Pollution Prevention
Small to Medium Sized
Enterprises
1-6
-------
URL
Universal Resource Locator
[ Figure 3. Standards in the ISO 14000 Series— Status as of. June 1997
Organizational Evaluation
ISO 14001
ISO 14004
ISO 14010
ISO 14011/1
ISO 14012
ISO 14015
ISO 14031
Environmental Management Systems — Specifications with Guidance
for Use
Environmental Management Systems — General Guidelines on
Principles, Systems, and Supporting Techniques
Guidelines for Environmental Auditing — General Principles on
Environmental Auditing
Guidelines for Environmental Auditing — Audit Procedures — Audit of
Environmental Management Systems
Guidelines for Environmental Auditing — Qualification Criteria for
Environmental Auditors
Environmental Site Assessments
Evaluation of Environmental Performance
Final International Standard
Final International Standard
Final International Standard
Final International Standard
Final International Standard
First Working Draft
Committee Draft
Product Evaluation
ISO 14040
ISO 14041
ISO 14042
ISO 14043
ISO 14020
ISO 14021
ISO 14022
ISO 14023
ISO 14024
ISO 14025
ISO Guide
64
Environmental Management — Life Cycle Analysis — Principles and
framework
Environmental Management — Life Cycle Analysis — Life Cycle
Inventory Analysis
Environmental Management — Life Cycle Analysis — Impact
Assessment
Environmental Management — Life Cycle Analysis — Interpretation
Goals and Principles of All Environmental Labeling
Environmental Labels and Declarations — Self Declaration
Environmental Claims — Terms and Definitions
Environmental Labels and Declarations — Self Declaration
Environmental Claims — Symbols
Environmental Labels and Declarations — Self Declaration
Environmental Claims — Testing and Verification
Environmental Labels and Declarations — Environmental Labeling
Type I — Guiding Principles and Procedures
Environmental Labels and Declarations — Environmental Information
Profiles — Type m Guiding Principles and Procedures
Guide for Inclusion of Environmental Aspects in Product Standards
Under vote as Final International
Standard
Committee Draft for ballot
Working Draft
Working Draft
Committee Draft for Comment
Draft International Standard
Under vote as Committee Draft
as above
Committee Draft
New Work Item
ISO Guide
Overall
1-7
-------
Figure 3. Standards in the ISO 14000 Series—Status as of June 1997
ISO 14050 Terms and Definitions—Guide on the Principles for ISO/TC 207/SC6
Terminology Work
Draft International Standard
ISO Standards Development Process:
(1) New Work Item proposal, (2) New Work Item assigned to Subcommittee, (3) Working Draft, (4) Committee Draft, (5)
Draft International Standard (or optional Final Draft International Standard), (6) International Standard.
1-8
-------
How To Update This
Resource Directory
Like the ISO 14000 standard development
process, this Resource Directory is a work in
progress. Over the coming months and years, it
will evolve dramatically as new initiatives are
added and other initiatives are completed or
discontinued. This Resource Directory will only
function well if it is maintained in an up-to-date
manner. For that the Agency must rely on the
user community. We therefore ask you, the users
of the Resource Directory, to help us keep it up
to date by informing us of:
— New entries to add to the Directory.
— Corrections to entries listed in the Directory.
— Updates and changes in your activities.
— New initiatives undertaken by your
organization.
— Leads on new or existing initiatives that
have not been included in this Resource
Directory.
Please use the form on the inside back cover of
the Resource Directory to submit updates,
corrections, and information on new initiatives.
1-9
-------
-------
U.S. EPA
INITIATIVES
Numerous offices within the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
are examining the ISO 14000 series of standards and considering its effects upon
their program sand activities. The first part of this chapter lists initiatives
undertaken by EPA headquarters offices, sorted alphabetically by the lead EPA
office. The second part lists regional EPA initiatives, presented hi numerical order
by EPA region.
1. Agency-wide Initiatives
2. Headquarters Initiatives
3. Regional Initiatives and Support
-------
-------
AGENCY-WIDE
INITIATIVES
The Voluntary Standards
Network
The Voluntary Standards Network was
established by EPA Administrator Browner in
1993 to address international voluntary
standards activities. A primary focus of the
Network has been to coordinate the Agency's
participation in the development of the ISO
14000 standards for environmental management.
With the passage of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act in 1996, the
Network also acts a principal means by which
the EPA Standards Executive communicates
policies and procedures regarding national and
international voluntary consensus standards to
the designated Agency Standards Coordinators.
The Standards Coordinators are key points of
contact for the Network. The Network
mechanism assists the Agency in developing
positions on the development and
implementation of standards, including the ISO
14000 standards, and identifying their
applicability to EPA projects and initiatives.
The Network also provides standards-related
information and training to EPA offices
nationwide and works closely with the EPA
Trade and Environment Task Force on issues
involving international trade agreements such as
the World Trade Organization. Coordination
through the Network helps ensure that EPA
speaks with one voice on important activities as
they pertain to standards, such as the ISO 14000
series. To date, there are over 160 members of
the Network from across the Agency. While the
Network is administered by the Office of
Pollution Prevention and Toxics, other Agency
Offices and Regions are actively involved and
take lead roles in the Network activities.
Addr: Mary McKiel, Director
Voluntary Standards Network
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(7409)
401 M St., SW
Washington, DC 20460
Tel: 202-260-3584
Fax: 202-260-0178
E-mail: mckiel.mary@epamail.epa.gov
Addr: Eric Wilkinson, Coordinator
Voluntary Standards Network
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(7409)
401 M St., SW
Washington, DC 20460
Tel: 202-260-3575
Fax: 202-260-0178
E-mail:
wilkinson.eric@epamail.epa.gov
Voluntary Standards
Executive
Addr: Pep Fuller, EPA Standards Executive
Office of Prevention, Pesticides and
Toxic Substances, 7101
401 M St, SW
Washington, DC 20460
Tel: 202-260-2897
Standards Coordinators
Addr: Jim Home, Standards Coordinator
Environmental Management System
(EMS) sub-TAG lead
EPA EMS Workgroup chair
Office of Water, 4201
401 M St, SW
Washington, DC 20460
Tel: 202-260-5802
Addr: Ken Feith, Standards Coordinator
Office of Air and Radiation, 6103
401 M St, SW
Washington, DC 20460
Tel: 202-260-4996
Addr: Greg Mertz, Standards Coordinator
Office of International Activities, 2621
401 M St, SW
Washington, DC 20460
Tel: 202-260-5714
Addr: Jerry Newsome, Standards Coordinator
Office of Policy, Planning and
Evaluation, 2128
401 M St, SW
Washington, DC 20460
Tel: 202-260-8666
2-1
-------
Addr: Elaine Koerner, Standards Coordinator
Office of Communication, Education
and Public Affairs, 1702
401MSt,SW
Washington, DC 20460
Tel: 202-260-2623
Addr:
and
Brian Riedel, Standards Coordinator
Chair of ISO 14001/EMS Task Group
Office of Enforcement and Compliance
Assurance, 2201A
401MSL.SW
Washington, DC 20460
Tel: 202-260-5006
Addr: Dana Arnold, Standards Coordinator
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, 5306W
401 M St, SW
Washington, DC 20460
Tel: 703-308-7279
Addr: David Scott Smith, Standards
Coordinator
Office of Administration and Resource
Management, 3207
401MSt,SW
Washington, DC 20460
Tel: 202-260-1647
Addr: Emma Lou George
Office of Research and Development,
G77
26 W. Martin Luther King Dr.
Cincinnati, OH 45268-0001
Tel: 513-569-7578
Agency Sub-TAG leads to the US
TAG
Addr: Cheryl Wasserman, Auditing
Sub-TAG lead
Office of Enforcement and Compliance
Assurance, 2251A
401MSt,SW
Washington, DC 20460
Tek 202-564-7219
Addr: Julie Lynch, Labeling Sub-TAG lead
Office of Pollution Prevention and
Toxics, 7409
401 M St, SW
Washington, DC 20460
Tel: 202-260-4000
Addr: John Harman, Environmental
Performance Evaluation
Sub-TAG lead
Office of Pollution Prevention and
Toxics, 7408
401 M St, SW
Washington, DC 20460
Tel: 202-260-6395
Addr: Susan McLaughlin, Environmental
Performance Evaluation sub-TAG
Office of Pollution Prevention and
Toxics, 7409
401 M St., SW
Washington, DC 20460
Tel: 202-260-3844
Addr:
466
Mary Ann Curran, Life Cycle Analysis
sub-TAG lead
Office of Research and Development,
26 W. Martin Luther King Dr.
Cincinnati, OH 45268
Tel: 513-569-7782
Addr: John Shoaff, Standards Coordinator and
Environmental Aspects in Product
Standards & Terms & Definitions
sub-TAG lead
Office of Pollution Prevention and
Toxics, 7409
401 M St, SW
Washington, DC 20460
Tel: 202-260-1831
Regional Coordinators
Addr: David Guest, Standards Coordinator
Region 1
One Congress Street
John F. Kennedy Federal Building
Boston, MA 02203-0001
Tel: 617-223-5541
2-2
-------
Addr: Jehuda Menczel, Standards
Coordinator
Region 2
290 Broadway
New York, NY 10007-1866
Tel: 212-637-4045
Addr: Linda Mauel, Alternate Coordinator
Region 2
2890 Woodbridge Ave., MS-220
Edison, NJ 08837-3679
Tel: 908-321-6766
Addr: Jeff Burke, Standards Coordinator
Region 3
841 Chestnut Building
Philadelphia, PA 19107
Tel: 215-566-2761
Addr: David Abbott, Standards Coordinator
Region 4
100 Alabama Street, SW
Atlanta, GA 30303
Tel: 404-347-2643
Addr: Catherine Allen, Standards Coordinator
Region 5
77 West Jackson Blvd.
Chicago, EL 60640-3507
Tel: 312-886-0180
Addr: Bob Clark, Standards Coordinator
Region 6
Fountain Place, 12th Floor, Suite 1200
1445 Ross Ave.
Dallas, TX 75202-2733
Tel: 214-665-6487
Addr: Chilton McLaughlin, Standards
Coordinator
Region 7
726 Minnesota Ave.
Kansas City, KS 66101
913-551-7666
Tel:
Addr:
David Schaller, Standards Coordinator
Region 8
999 18th Street, Suite 500
Denver, CO 80202-2466
Tel: 303-312-6146
Addr: Bonnie Barkett, Standards Coordinator
Region 9
75 Hawthorne Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
Tel: 415-744-1908
Addr: Nancy Helm, Standards Coordinator
Region 10
1200 Sixth Ave.
Seattle, WA 98101
Tel: 206-553-8659
Addr: David Tetta, Standards Coordinator
Region 10
1200 Sixth Ave.
Seattle, WA 98101
Tel: 206-553-1327 .
HEADQUARTERS
INITIATIVES
Office of Air Quality Planning
& Standards (OAQPS)
OAQPS Web site. The OAQPS Web site is the
clearinghouse for EPA regulations regarding air
quality.
Addr: Tom Link, OAQPS Webmaster
U.S. EPA (MD-12)
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Tel: 919-541-5456
Fax: 919-541-0242
E-mail: link.tom@epamail.epa.gov
URL: http://www.epa.gov/oar/oa
Office of Air and Radiation
(OAR)
Natural Gas STAR Program. This voluntary
program is designed to cost-effectively reduce
emissions of greenhouse gases from the natural
gas industry. Developed as a partnership
between the EPA and the natural gas industry,
the program addresses emissions of methane and
2-3
-------
carbon dioxide through, a series of cost-effective
best management practices.
Addr: Rhone Resch, Program Manager
U.S. EPA (6202J)
401 M Street, SW
Washington, DC 20460
Tel: 202-233-9793
Fax: 202-233-9569
E-mail: reschjhone@epamail.epa.gov
URL: http://www.ctc.com
OAR Web site. The OAR Web site is the
clearinghouse for information on EPA's efforts to
protect and preserve air quality.
Addr: Tom Link, OAR Superstructure
Manager
U.S. EPA (MD-12)
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Tel: 919-541-5456
Fax: 919-541-0242
E-mail: Unk.tom@epamail.epa.gov
URL: http://www.epa.gov/oar
Office of Enforcement and
Compliance Assurance
(OECA)
Environmental Leadership Program (ELP).
ELP is one of the 25 Reinventing Environmental
Regulations announced on March 16,1995, by
President Clinton. A 1-year pilot phase was
completed in August 1996 that evaluated
opportunities for new tools using third party
auditing and alternative performance-based
management systems. The success of the 12
pilot projects demonstrated the effectiveness of
partnerships with state environmental agencies,
and the cooperative ability in conducting a
voluntary program with industry and federal
facilities.
The goals for the implementation of the full-
scale ELP by January 1997 include 1) better
environmental and human health protection by
promoting a systematic approach to managing
environmental issues and by encouraging
environmental enhancement activities; 2)
increased identification and timely resolution of
environmental compliance issues by ELP
participants; 3) multiplying the compliance
assistance efforts by including industry as
mentors; and 4) fostering constructive and open
relationships between agencies, the regulated
community, and the public.
The foundation for recognizing environmental
leaders will be the implementation of an
environmental management system (EMS), an
integrated, structured, and systematic approach
for identifying significant environmental impacts
resulting from an organization's activities,
products, and services. The intent is to achieve
compliance with environmental regulations,
provide an ability for continuous improvement,
identify opportunities for implementing
pollution prevention activities and practices, and
communicate effectively with outside
stakeholders on the organization's EMS and its
performance.
The 6-year ELP participation period is designed
to publicly recognize specific facilities or
entities, as well as offer benefits for participation
through reduced inspections, a self-correction
period for violations, and streamlined
administrative requirements. EPA anticipates
that the ELP will be coordinated in partnership
with interested state environmental agencies, in
order to extend the benefits offered on a state-by-
state basis. Facilities/entities will be required to
conduct compliance and EMS auditing in
conjunction with third party verification of the
audits. EPA will also make an annual
environmental report available to the public.
This proposed framework is currently available
to all stakeholders for review and comment.
Addr: Tai-ming Chang, Director, ELP
Office of Enforcement and Compliance
Office of Compliance (2223-A)
401 M Street, SW
Washington, DC 20460
Tel: 202-564-5081
Fax: 202-564-0050
E-mail: chang.
taiming @ epamail.epa.gov
URL: http://es.inel.gov/elp
Addr: Debby Thomas, Deputy Director, ELP
See above
Tel: 202-564-5041
2-4
-------
Fax: 202-564-0050
E-mail:
thomas.deborah@ epamail.epa.gov
URL: http://es.inel.gov/elp
ISO 14001/EMS Task Group. This task group
is composed of representatives from all major
EPA offices and 8 Regions, the Department of
Justice, and 18 states (Alaska, Arizona,
California, Colorado, Delaware, Maryland,
Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska,
New Jersey, New York, North Carolina,
Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee,
Washington, and Wisconsin).
The primary purpose of the task group is to
determine and make recommendations regarding
the relationship between ISO 14001, EMS
standards, compliance, enforcement, and
improved environmental performance. By fall
1997, EPA expects to solicit public comment on
metrics or indicators for evaluating
environmental performance in EMS pilots.
Addr: Brian Riedel, Counsel
Office of Enforcement and Compliance
Office of Planning and Policy Analysis
401 M Street, SW
Washington, DC 20460
Tel: 202-564-5006
Fax: 202-501-0701
E-mail: riedel.brian@epamail.epa.gov
Office of Federal Activities
EMS Audit Procedural Guidelines. A sub-task
group of me U.S. Technical Advisory Group
(U.S. TAG) for ISO's EMS development
produced the EMS audit procedural guidelines.
A final draft currently out for comment will be
used in conjunction with ISO Standard
Guidelines in Environmental Auditing
Principles, procedures and qualifications set
forth hi ISO 14010-12 related to environmental
auditing. These guidelines will assist auditors
conducting ISO 14001 conformance audits and
set boundaries for EMS audits used for internal
self-assessments, self- certifications of
conformity with ISO 14001, or by registrars for
ISO 14001 registrations to ensure they are at
once credible, replicable, and not overly
burdensome or interpretive of the ISO standards.
This document will be revised as needed upon
further review within the United States and
among key stakeholder groups.
Addr: Cheryl Wasserman, Associate Director
for Policy Analysis
Office of Federal Activities, OECA
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(2251-A)
401 M Street SW
Washington, DC 20460
Tel: 202-564-7129
Fax: 202-564-0070
E-mail:
wasserman.cheryl@epamail.epa.gov
Office of Policy, Planning, and
Evaluation (OPPE)
Indiana Small Business Pilot Project. Please
see Chapter 4, under Indiana, for full listing.
Addr: Carl Koch
U.S. EPA, Office of Policy, Planning
and Evaluation
401 M Street, SW
Washington, DC 20460
Tel: 202-260-2739
Fax: 202-260-9322
E-mail: koch.carl@epamail.epa.gov
URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppe/isd/isd.htm
Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxics
Consumer Labeling Initiative. The Consumer
Labeling Initiative's goal is to foster pollution
prevention, empower consumer choice, and
improve understanding by presenting clear,
consistent, and useful safe use, environmental,
and health information on household consumer
product labels. This is a multi-phased voluntary
pilot project focusing on indoor insecticides,
outdoor pesticides, and household hard surface
cleaners.
Addr: Julie Lynch
Pollution Prevention Division
(MC-7409)
Office of Pollution Prevention and
Toxics
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
2-5
-------
401MSt,SW
Washington, DC 20460
Tel: 202-260-4000
Fax: 202-260-0178
E-mail: lynch.jnlie@epamail.epa.gov
Environmental Accounting Project. The
Environmental Accounting Project is a
nonregulatory partnership program with a
mission of helping organizations highlight the
economic benefits of practicing pollution
prevention. Its objective is to encourage and
motivate businesses to understand the full
spectrum of their environmental costs, and
integrate these costs into strategic decision-
making.
Addr:
7409)
Toxics
Tel:
Fax:
E-mail.
gov
URL:
Susan McLaughlin
Pollution Prevention Division (MC-
Office of Pollution Prevention and
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401M Street, SW
Washington, DC 20460
202-260-3844
202-260-0178
mclaughlin.susan@epamail.epa.
http://es.inel.gov/partners/
acctg/acctgJitml
Environmentally-Preferable Public
Purchasing. The Environmentally Preferable
Purchasing Program implements Executive.
Order 12873 which requires EPA to "issue
guidance that recommends principals that
Executive agencies should use in making
determinations for the preference and purchase
of environmentally preferable products" and
services. The Program's goal is make
environmental performance a factor in Federal
government purchasing decisions, along with
traditional factors, such as product performance
and cost.
Addr: Eun-Sook Goidel
Pollution Prevention Division
(MC-7409)
Office of Pollution Prevention and
Toxics
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401 M St. SW
Washington, DC 20460
Tel: 202-260-3296
Fax: 202-260-0178
E-mail:
goidel.eun-sook@epamail.epa.gov
Expanding the Use of Environmental
Information by the Banking Industry Through
ISO 14000. This effort will initially bean EPA-
funded study to explore the potential utility of
ISO 14000-generated information for banks in
their risk management practices.
Addr: EdWeiler
Pollution Prevention Division
U.S. EPA (7409)
401 M Street SW
Washington, DC 20460
Tel: 202-260-2996
Fax: 202-260-0178
Addr: Brian Murray
Center for Economics Research
Research Triangle Institute
3040 Cornwallis Road
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
Tel: 919-541-6468
Fax: 919-541-6683
E-mail: bcm@rti.org
Office of Research and
Development (ORD)
Environmental Technology Verification
Program. EPA has evaluated technology to
determine their effectiveness in preventing,
controlling, and cleaning up pollution. As a part
of the Environmental Technology Initiative, EPA
is now expanding these efforts by instituting a
new program, the Environmental Technology
Verification Program (ETV), to verify the
performance of a larger universe of innovative
technical solutions to problems that threaten
human health or the environment. ETV was
created to substantially accelerate the entrance of
new environmental technologies into the
domestic and international marketplace. It
supplies technology buyers and developers,
consulting engineers, states, and EPA regions
2-6
-------
with data on the performance of new
technologies to encourage more rapid protection
of the environment with better and less
expensive approaches. EPA will utilize the
expertise of both public and private partner
"verification organizations," including federal
laboratories, states, universities, and private
sector facilities, to design efficient processes for
conducting or overseeing performance tests of
innovative technologies.
Verification organizations will oversee and
report verification activities based on testing and
quality assurance protocols developed with input
from all major stakeholder and customer groups
associated with the technology area.
Addr: Penelope Hansen
U.S. EPA, ORD (8301)
401 M Street, SW
Washington, DC 20460
Tel: 202-260-2600
Fax: 202-260-3861
E-mail:
hansen.penelope @ epamail.epa.gov
URL: http://www.epa.gov/etv
Implementing EMS in the Metal Finishing
Industry. In this EPA-funded project, 11
organizations from the metal finishing industry
are piloting the implementation of the ISO
14001 Standard. The project will result in a
publicly available report, in addition to an EMS
guidance document for metal finishers. The
metal finishing report and guidance document
will be completed by December 1997.
Addr: Greg Ondich
U.S. EPA, ORD
401 M Street, SW
Washington, DC 20460
Tel: 202-260-5753
E-mail: ondich.greg@epamail.epa.gov
URL: http://www.epa.gov/etv
Addr: Craig Diamond
NSF International
2100 Commonwealth Blvd., Suite 100
Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Tel:
Fax:
313-332-7341
313-669-0196
Office of Water (OW)
EMS Demonstration Project. This EPA project
has provided seed money for 18 public and
private organizations to put an EMS in place
using ISO 14001 as a model. The program has
provided initial training and follow-up
consulting through NSF International. This
initiative will generate a series of reports on the
various pilot projects, which will be available
through the OW resource center in both hard
copy and on the Internet.
Addr: Jim Home
U.S. EPA, OW (4201)
401 M Street SW
Washington, DC 20460
Tel: 202-260-5802
Fax: 202-260-1040
E-mail: horne.james@epamail.epa.gov
Addr: Craig Diamond
NSF International
2100 Commonwealth Blvd., Suite 100
Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Tel: 313-332-7341
Fax: 313-669-0196
EMS Implementation Guide for Small- and
Medium-Sized Organizations. EPA's Office of
Water and Office of Compliance, in conjunction
with NSF International, has developed an
implementation guide geared specifically to the
needs of small- and medium- sized
organizations. The elements of the document are
based on the ISO 14001 Standard. The guide is
formatted and written in such a way as to give
these types of organizations useful ideas on how
to begin implementing EMS and ways to find
additional helpful information.
Using EMS To Meet Watershed Protection
Goals. This project seeks to contribute to the
attainment of watershed goals through a system-
based voluntary approach. Participants are
linked to achievement of watershed goals in the
Arbor- Middle Kron River Watershed. A joint
2-7
-------
project of OW and the county government in
Washtenaw County (Michigan), the initiative
involves recruiting organizations to participate in
training and improving technical systems
relevant to the organization.
Addr: Jim Home
U.S. EPA, OW (4201)
401 M Street SW
Washington, DC 20460
Tel: 202-260-5802
Fax: 202-260-1040
E-mail: horne.james@epamail.epa.gov
Addr: Anita M. Cooney
NSF International
2100 Commonwealth Blvd., Suite 100
Ann Arbor, MI 48105
Tel: 313-332-7333
Fax: 313-669-0196
EMS Implementation by Municipal
Governments. OW hopes to work with selected
municipal or county government organizations
that are willing to implement EMS for their
various activities, using ISO 14001 as a baseline.
Preliminary discussions with interested parties
have begun and an overall project
implementation plan is expected in Fall 1997.
This effort will demonstrate the relevance of
EMS for public- sector organizations.
OWEMS Implementation Workgroup. OW, in
conjunction with regional offices and states, is
forming a workgroup to explore possible ways to
encourage Implementation of EMS by facilities
regulated under various parts of the water
program. The workgroup will concentrate on
issues relating to regulatory programs in areas
such as permitting, and explore the possible use
of incentives for facilities with good compliance
records that can also implement effective EMS.
ISO 14001 will serve as the baseline for this
effort, but the workgroup will also examine other
possible criteria that facilities may need to
satisfy as a condition for any type of regulatory
or other flexibility.
Addr: Jim Home
U.S. EPA, OW (4201)
401 M Street SW
Washington, DC 20460
Tel: 202-260-5802
Fax: 202-260-1040
E-mail: horne.james@epamail.epa.gov
Office of Federal Facilities
Enforcement
Code of Environmental Management
Principles for Federal Agencies (CEMP).
CEMP, an element of the Federal Government
Environmental Challenge Program established in
response to Section 4-405 of Executive Order
12856, is a set of five principles encouraging
federal agencies to be more aware and visionary
in their management of environmental protection
issues. The principles incorporate many
common elements of EMS, and ISO 14001 and
several other public and private sector
documents were used as background. A Pacific
Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) team
supported EPA's Office of Federal Facilities
Enforcement in developing the CEMP. EPA has
asked federal agencies to endorse the principles
and provide a description of how they will be
implemented at the facility level.
Addr: Jim Edwards, Deputy Director
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Planning, Prevention &
Compliance (2261-A)
401 M Street, SW
Washington, DC 20460
202-564-2462
202-501-0069
Tel-
Fax:
E-mail:
edwards.j ames @ epamail.epa.gov
EMS Primer for Federal Facilities. EPA's
Federal Facility Enforcement and DOE's Office
of Environmental Policy and Assistance are
jointly sponsoring the development of an
Environmental Management Systems Primer for
Federal Facilities with EPA's Office of Federal
Facilities Enforcement. A PNNL team is
supporting development. Topics covered will
include an introduction to EMS and federal
facility issues; the first steps in building an
EMS; regulatory issues; innovative regulatory
2-8
-------
approaches; performance indicators; pollution
prevention; audits and conformity assessment
options; and the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA). The primer is designed to be
concise, include extensive references, and
provide useful examples and concrete steps.
Addr: Andrew Cherry
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Federal Facilities Enforcement Office
(2261-A)
401 M Street, SW
Washington, DC 20460
Tel: 202-564-5011
Fax: 202-501-0644
E-mail:
cherry.andrew@epamail.epa.gov
Addr: Larry Stirling
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Environmental Policy and
Assistance, EH-41
1000 Independence Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20585
Tel: 202-586-2417
Fax: 202-586-0955
E-mail: john.stirling@hq.doe.gov
(This entry is cross-listed under DOE initiatives
in Chapter 3.)
National Enforcement
Investigations Center
Compliance-Focused EMS. Since the late
1980s, civil multimedia compliance
investigations conducted by the NEIC have
increasingly involved identifying causes of
observed noncompliance. When investigated,
noncompliance most often appeared to be caused
by dysfunctional EMS. Through this work and
by participating in followup enforcement
actions, NEIC developed criteria for a
compliance-focused EMS that has been used as
the basis for several of the settlement agreements
when EMS improvements were required. The
agreements required the organization to
document policies, systems, procedures, and
standards for 11 program elements, with the
resulting document serving as a guidebook to
more detailed procedures and processes located
elsewhere at a facility.
The intended result is to develop an EMS that
will born improve the organization's compliance
with applicable environmental requirements and
lead to improved environmental performance.
The elements were synthesized primarily from
EMS assessment protocols developed for the
Global Environmental Management Initiative
(1992) and a regulated industry (1994) by
Deloitte and Touche IIP of San Francisco; ISO
14001; National Sanitation Foundation EMS
standards (NSF110-1995); and the due
diligence definition in the EPA policy regarding
Incentives for Self-Policing (60 FR 66710).
Element refinement continues through
settlement negotiations and discussions with
EPA staff, EMS consultants, and environmental
personnel from several companies with medium
and large facilities.
Addr: Steve Sisk
U.S. EPA-NEIC
Box 25227, Bldg 53
Denver Federal Center
Denver, CO 80225
Tel: 303-236-3636 ext. 540
Fax: 303-236-2395
E-mail: sisk.steve@epamail.epa.gov
Project XL
XL projects are real world tests of innovative
strategies that achieve cleaner and cheaper
results than conventional regulatory approaches.
EPA will grant regulated entities regulatory
flexibility in exchange for their commitment to
achieve better environmental results than would
have been attained through full regulatory
compliance.
Addr: Jon Kessler
401 M Street, SW (MC 2129)
Washington, DC 20460
Tel: 202-260-3761
Fax: 202-401-6637
E-mail: kessler.jon@epamail.epa.gov
URL: http://www.epa.gov/ProjectXL
2-9
-------
EPA REGIONAL
INITIATIVES AND
Region 1
StarTrack, EPA's regional office in Boston is
conducting a groundbreaking experiment to
privatize compliance assurance for leading
companies. Built on the ISO 14000 model, the
region will be empowering third parties to certify
to three basic components: 1) an environmental
management system modeled on ISO 14001; 2)
facility environmental compliance and pollution
prevention audits; and 3) a commitment to
correct certain violations within an established
time frame. The third party will certify to each
component and provide a summary report. In
return, EPA will grant certified companies
limited penalty amnesty, no routine inspections,
simplified reporting and expedited permitting.
EPA plans to refocus resources previously
devoted to these sources to issues that pose a
greater risk to the environment.
Addr: Dave Guest, StarTrack Coordinator
U.S. EPA, Region 1 (SPE)
JFK Federal Building
Boston, MA. 02203
Tel: 617-565-3348
Fax: 617-565-4939
E-mail: guest.david@epamail.epa.gov
Addr: George Hawkins, Senior Advisor
U.S. EPA, Region 1 (SPE)
JFK Federal Building
Boston, MA. 02203
Tel: 617-565-9125
Fax: 617-565-4939
E-mail:
hawkins.george@epamail.epa.gov
Environmental Leadership Program-New
England. EPA's regional office in Boston is
conducting a regional environmental leadership
program to encourage and reward environmental
leadership and to experiment with alternative
models to achieve environmental compliance.
The region periodically requests applications for
businesses or other organizations that have
demonstrated a commitment to environmental
performance going beyond regulatory
compliance. Selected organizations receive
public recognition, and partner with the region to
experiment with alternative approaches. In
many cases, companies are experimenting with
approaches based on the ISO EMS, including
self-certification and mentoring EMS
implementation with customers and suppliers.
Addr: Gina Snyder, ELP Coordinator
U.S. EPA, Region 1 (SPE)
JFK Federal Building
Boston, MA 02203
Tel: 617-860-4ELP or
Gina Snyder at 617-565 -9452
Fax: 617-565-4939
E-mail: snyder.grna@epamail.epa.gov
URL: http://es.inel.gov/elp
Compliance Leadership Through
Environmental Audits and Negotiation
(CLEAN). EPA's regional office in Boston has
launched an effort to improve environmental
management and performance in smaller
companies. In exchange for a commitment to
achieve performance, in part by adopting
pollution prevention practices, SMEs receive a
comprehensive compliance and pollution
prevention assessment by a partnership
comprising federal, state, and private sector
experts. The program is determining how these
assessments may include an analysis of EMS
based on 14000 to help these small companies
maintain compliance.
Addr: Austine Frawley, CLEAN Coordinator
U.S. EPA, Region 1 (SPE)
JFK Federal Building
Boston, MA 02203
Tel: 617-565-3231
Fax: 617-565-4939
E-mail:
frawley.austine@epamail.epa.gov
Region 3
2-10
-------
ISO 14000 Project XL. The projects combine
the ISO 14000 standards with the requirements
of the Project XL initiative, thereby adding
greater environmental specificity to the usage of
ISO 14000 standards in the United States. As
the EMS is developed, EPA will focus on
defining superior environmental results,
establishing public involvement, developing
methods of pollution prevention, and improving
processes and results.
Addr: Alvin R. Morris
U.S. EPA Region 3
841 Chestnut Street
Philadelphia, PA 19107
Tel: 215-566-6701
Fax: 215-566-2301
E-mail: morris.alvin@epamail.epa.gov
Addr: Deborah Sabatini Hennelly
Lucent Technology
131 Morristown Road
Basking Ridge, NJ 07920
Tel: 908-630-2814
Fax: 908-204-8865
Region 4
Using ISO 14000 in the Paper Industry. The
Weyerhaeuser Hint River Operations paper mill
has signed a Project XL Agreement with EPA.
The Weyerhaeuser paper mill will implement
ISO 14000 at its Flint River site in Georgia. The
overall objective of this XL Agreement will be to
half the solid waste at the facility, cut energy
consumption, reduce the toxic waste stream, and
set records for low water usage for a paper mill
of its size.
Addr: David B. Abbott
U.S. EPA Region 4
61 Forsyth Street
Atlanta, GA 30303
Tel: 404-562-9631
Fax: 404-562-9598
E-mail: abbott.david@epamail.epa.gov
Addr: William (Bill) Patton (Project XL)
U.S. EPA Region 4
61 Forsyth Street
Atlanta, GA 30303
Tel: 404-562-9610
Fax: 404-562-6598
E-mail: patton.bill@epamail.epa.gov
Region 5
Life Cycle Assessment Methodology. This
effort is developing and demonstrating Life
Cycle Assessment (LCA) applications within
industry and government. Specifically, the focus
has been on streamlined LCA applications.
Existing LCA data is being analyzed using
methods currently employed by LCA
practitioners. Areas of demonstration include
alternative adhesives for auto interiors, recycled
versus virgin newsprint for newspapers,
alternative cleaning systems, fiberglass
reinforced plastics, and composite wood. The
estimated completion date is September 1997.
Addr: Mary Ann Curran
U.S.EPA,NRMRL
26 West Martin Luther King Drive
MS 466
Cincinnati, OH 45268
Tel: 513-569-7782
Fax: 513-569-7111
E-mail:
cmran.maryann@epamail.epa.gov
Region 6
ISO 14000: A National Dialogue. This national
conference was one in a series of events
designed to facilitate a dialogue on issues
surrounding ISO 14000 and its implementation.
EPA Region 6 presented this conference in
conjunction with the Global Environment &
Technology Foundation (GETF) and the
University of Texas at Arlington (UTA) on
November 11-12,1996, at the UTA campus.
Addr: Bob Clark
EPA Region 6
Tel: 214-665-6487
Fax: 214-665-2168
Addr: Richard Cooper
2-11
-------
GETF
Tel: 703-750-6401
Fax: 703-750-6506
Addr: Dr. Gerald Nehman
UTA
Tel: 817-272-2300
Region 8
EMS for Federal Facilities. EPA Region 8
conducted EMS reviews at selected federal
facilities in February 1997. In conjunction with
this activity, an EPA consultant offered training
in the ISO 14001 Standard.
Addr: Diane Thiel
U.S. EPA Region 8
Pollution Prevention Office (8P2-P2)
999 18th Street, Suite 500
Denver, CO 80202
Tel: 303-312-6389
Fax: 303-312-6741
E-mail: thiel.diane@epamail.epa.gov
Region 9
The Merit Partnership for Pollution
Prevention. The Merit Partnership for Pollution
Prevention is a "public-private partnership"
dedicated to the advancement of pollution
prevention technologies
and practices that both protect the environment
and aid economic growth.
Merit is developing a series of pilot projects to
demonstrate the environmental and economic
impacts of ISO 14001. The Merit ISO projects
will explore a number of issues, including the
effect of ISO 14001 on a company's
environmental insurance options, how ISO
14001 may affect companies' government
procurement opportunities, the accounting costs
of the development and implementation of ISO
14001, and the effect of ISO 14001 on
companies' environmental compliance records.
Addr: Bonnie Barkett
U.S. EPA Region 9
75 Hawthorne St
San Francisco, CA 94195
Tel: 415-744-1908
Fax: 415-744-1873
E-mail:
barkett.bonnie@epamail.epa.gov
Addr: John French
ENVIRON Corporation
One Park Plaza, Suite 700
Irvine, CA 92714
Tel: 714-798-3691
Fax: 714-587-5151
E-mail: jfrench@envifon.org
Region 10
Evaluation of Policy Implications of ISO
14000 and Other EMS Standards. The overall
objective of this effort will be to examine how
ISO 14000 and other EMS standards can help
make regulatory activities more effective
(reducing pollution) and efficient (reducing the
costs of assistance, compliance, and
enforcement). This assessment will include a
review of existing pilot projects and initiatives
on a regional and national level, a review of the
professional literature related to standards
deployment, and an analysis of what this
information implies for policy making and
regulatory reform efforts currently underway
within the region.
Addr: John Palmer, Pollution Prevention
Manager
U.S. EPA Region 10 (01-085)
1200 6th Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101
Tel: 206-553-6521
E-mail: palmer.john@epamail.epa.gov
Addr: Scott Butner, Senior Research Scientist
Environment and Society Group
Battelle Seattle Research Center
4000 NE 41st Street
Seattle, WA 98105
Tel: 206-528-3290
Fax: 206-528-3552
E-mail: butner@battelle.org
URL: httpy/www.seattle.battelle.org
2-12
-------
State of Washington Department of Ecology
ISO 14000 Leadership Project. Please see
Chapter 4, under Washington, for full listing.
OTHER FEDERAL
INITIATIVES
Many federal agencies besdies EPA are also interested in the ISO 14000 series of standards.
These range from the Department of Commerce, which has an interest in how the standards may
affect trade and competitiveness, to the U.S. Army, which is considering using IO 14001
management systems principles to manage their facilities. This chapter includes initiatives funded
and managed by federal government departments and agenicies other than EPA. The listed
initiatives explore the use of ISO 14000 in their respective jurisdictions and also application of
ISO 14000 within the departments or agencies themselves.
1. Department of Commerce
2. Department of Defense
3. Department of Energy
4. Department of State
5. Food and Drug Administration
6. Federal Trade Commission
7. U.S. Postal Service
-------
-------
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMERCE
National Institute of Standards
and Technology (NIST)
Informational Paper. The NIST has published
an informational paper on the evolving ISO
14000 series.
Addr: Mary Saunders
Office of Standards Services
National Institute of Standards and
Technology
Building 820, Room 282
Gaithersburg, MD 20899
Tel: 301-975-2396
Fax: 301-963-2871
E-mail: mary.saunders@nist.gov
URL: http://ts.nisLgov/ts/htdocs/
210/216/environ.html
Interagency Committee on Standards Policy's
EMS/ISO 14000 Workgroup. The operating
guide for the workgroup is to provide
information and recommendations to the
Interagency Committee on Standards Policy
regarding development and implementation of
the ISO 14000. The committee has chosen to
focus its initial efforts on four main areas: 1)
implementation and integration with other
systems and federal role in pilots; 2) metrics and
evaluation of proposed indicators, cost
measurement, and relationship to current
indicators; 3) technical assistance and the role of
federal government in providing technical
assistance to NGOs, SMEs, other state and
federal government bodies; 4) procurement and
ISO 14000 fit with policies, contracting issues,
and federal acquisition regulations. The
workgroup is co-chaired by Ms. Mary McKiel of
EPA and Mr. Larry Stirling of DOE.
Addr: Krista Johnsen Leuteritz
Environmental Projects Manager
Office of Standard Services &
Manufacturing Extension Partnership
NIST
Building 301 RoomC-100
Gailhersburg, MD 20899
Tel: 301-975-5104
Fax: 301-963-2871
E-mail: kristin.leuteritz@nist.gov
Manufacturing Extension
Partnership (MEP)
Formerly the Manufacturing Technology Center
program, this partnership is a nationwide system
of manufacturing extension centers, state
planning nonprofit support, and coordinated
information, services, and resources. The
partnership is designed to bridge a technological
gap between sources of manufacturing
technology and the small- and medium-sized
enterprises (SMEs) that need to improve their
competitiveness through the use of appropriate
modern technologies, processes, and techniques.
Addr: Joyce Johannson
Manufacturing Extension Partnership
U.S. Department of Commerce/NIST
Building 224, Room Bl 15
Gaithersburg, MD 20899-0001
Tel: 301-975-5020
Fax: 301-963-6556
ISO 14000 Workgroup for the National P2
Roundtable. Please see Chapter 4, under North
Carolina, and Chapter 5, under
Nongovernmental Organizations, for full listing.
ISO 14000/EMS Gap Analysis Tool Suite. The
tool suite will include an implementation primer
that will detail protocol for implementation of an
EMS gap analysis with three appendices. A case
study of an EMS gap analysis used as a
screening tool by field engineers and consultants
for marketing, to present the benefits of ISO
14000 and EMS will be included. One initial
output from the screening tool will be a 1-2 page
letter with a visual attachment showing gaps in
conformance to ISO 14001. This gap analysis
will cover the main elements of the standard and
may lead to a detailed EMS gap analysis or an
implementation project Also, the appendices
will illustrate the EMS gap analysis as a detailed
3-1
-------
ISO 14001 audit, and include an interpretation
guide (glossary of terms).
The tool will use a "look for... and look at..."
type of format with a rating system for the field
engineer or consultant to rank the company on a
per-element basis. This project is being created
by a consortium of MEP centers, private firms,
andNIST-MEP.
Addr: Krista Johnsen Leuteritz
Environmental Projects Manager
Office of Standard Services &
Manufacturing Extension Partnership
NIST
Building 301 Room C-100
Gaithersburg, MD 20899
Tel: 301-975-5104
Fax: 301-963-2871
E-mail: kristin.leuteritz@nist.gov
Addr: Stan Carson
Environmental Program Manager
Lake Erie MEP
1700 North Westwood Avenue
Toledo, OH 43607-1207
Tel: 419-534-3705
Fax: 419-531-8465
E-mail: stan.carson@eisc.org
GreenscoreTM. GreenscoreTM is an
environmental self-assessment tool.
Addr: Paul Chalmer
NCMS
3025 Boardwalk Drive
Ann Arbor, MI 48108-3266
Tel: 313-995^-911
Fax: 313-995-1150
E-mail: paul.chahner@ncms.org
URL: http://www.ncms.org
Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing
(ECM). Please see Chapter 4, under Maine, for
full listing.
ISO 14000 Awareness for Maryland
Manufacturers. Please see Chapter 4, under
Maryland, for full listing.
Vermont Manufacturing Extension Center.
Please see Chapter 4, under Vermont, for full
listing.
DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE (DOD)
Environmental Management
Systems Committee
The Office of the Deputy Undersecretary of
Defense for Environmental Security has
established an Environmental Management
Systems Committee to examine the feasibility of
implementing EMS, such as the ISO 14000
series. In addition to work within the
Department, DOD is working with North
American Trade Organization (NATO) and
Partnership for Peace nations (Eastern European
nations, the newly independent Baltic/Slavic
states, Finland, and Sweden) to determine how
environmental management systems can be
implemented in the military. The purpose of
DOD analysis of environmental management
systems is to determine whether adoption of
environmental management standards will
improve the quality of DOD's environmental
programs through the application of uniform
quality management techniques.
Addr: Andrew M. Forth
3400 Defense Pentagon
Washington, DC 20301-3400
Tel: 703-604-1820
Fax: 703-607-3124
E-mail: portham@acq.osd.mil
U.S. Army
Adoption of ISO 14000 Methodologies for
Environmental LCA being conducted on
•weapon systems and materials. The Systems
Life Cycle Readiness Office, Armament
Research and Development Command, acts as a
bridge between the developer and the producer
of new materials and systems. Key aspects
include life cycle evaluations of producibility
and environmental impacts, costs, and risks.
This office conducts environmental LCAs
3-2
-------
(research and development, production, fielding
and storage, and disposal) of new components or
systems. It also works closely with operating
sites on environmental management plans and
initiatives on pollution prevention and
compliance. This parallels industry's life cycle
stages and activities as addressed by EPA,
Society of Environmental Toxicology and
Chemistry (SETAC), and ISO 14000.
Recent DOD guidance on Acquisition Strategy
has strengthened many areas of LCAs that are
parallel with emerging SETAC and ISO
guidance.
Addr: Lawrence R. Laibson
Systems life Cycle Readiness Office
AMSMC-STA-AR-SRE
Building 172
Picatinny Arsenal, NJ. 07806-5000
Tel: 201-724-2822
Fax: 201-724-4096
E-mail: llaibson@pica.army.mil
URL: htrpy/www.pica.army.mil./orgs/slcro/
top.html
Total Quality Environmental Management
(TQEM) - Green Initiatives. This program is a
U.S. Army Armament Research, Development,
& Engineering Center (ARDEC) program that
provides linkage between current quality
initiatives and programs in environmental
stewardship. The pilot programs will be
implemented by industry and government
partners who will voluntarily adopt the ISO
14000 environmental management system
standards. By achieving ISO 9000/14000
certification, Army contractors and government
facilities will improve quality, reduce operations
costs, and develop products for both U.S. and
foreign military sales; enhance their competitive
position and facilities reputation; and reduce
government oversight Finally, the pilot
programs will also offer an excellent opportunity
to partner with U.S. Army materiel contractors to
jointly pursue acquisition reform strategies.
Addr: Henry J. Van Dyke III
U.S. Army Armament Research
Development and Engineering Center
Industrial Ecology Center
Product Assurance
Attn: AMSTA-AR-ET(QA)
Building 172
Picatinny Arsenal, NJ 07806-5000
Tel: 201-724-4071
or DSN 880-4071
Fax: 201-724-6759
E-mail: henryv@pica.army.mil
URL: httpy/www.pica.army.mil/orgs/
eto/top.html
ISO 14001 Feasibility Initiative. The U.S.
Army is evaluating the applicability of the ISO
14001 standard to the facility's existing
environmental programs. With assistance from
Concurrent Technologies Corporation, this
initiative will explore the current status of the
environmental programs at the DOD facility,
identify the missing ISO 14001 requirements or
"gaps" between these programs and the EMS
standard; the standard requirements and the
associated costs and benefits of modification;
and realign and adopt ISO 14001 requirements.
Addr: John Thorns
Concurrent Technologies Corporation
1450 Scalp Avenue
Johnstown, PA 15904
Tel: 814-269-6805
Fax: 814-269-2798
E-mail: thoms@ctc.com
URL: http://www.ctc.com
Air Force ISO 14001
Workshops
A series of ISO 14001 primers and introductory,
overview, and implementation workshops for the
U.S. Air Force Materiel Command, in
conjunction with Concurrent Technologies
Corporation, will be initiated. Headquarters and
base-level training are to be provided. Training
will be specifically directed to DOD
requirements and mission-specific activities.
Addr: Joe Hollingsworth
Concurrent Technologies Corporation
Suite 165
Fairborn, OH 45324
3-3
-------
Tel: 513-429-6178
Fax: 513-429-6178
E-mail: hollings@ctc.com
URL: http://www.ctc.com
U.S. Navy EMS Evaluation
The U.S. Navy is evaluating EMS and ISO
14000 as they pertain to Navy operations to
identify and quantify any value added by their
implementation. This effort will lead to the
development of U.S. Navy policy on EMS and/or
ISO 14000.
Addr: Catharine Cyr
Office of the Chief of Naval Operations
2211 South Clark Place
Arlington, VA 22244-5108
Tel: 703-602-5335
Fax: 703-602-2676
E-mail: cyrc@N4.opnav.navy.mil
Addr: Terry Bowers
Office of the Chief of Naval Operations
Arlington, VA 22244-5108
Tel: 703-602-4769
Fax: 703-602-5547
E-mail: bowerst@N4.opnav.navy.mil
Naval Surface Warfare Center
(NSWC) Carderock ISO
14000 Implementation and
Certification
NSWC Carderock is pursuing its first ISO 14000
certification at its Philadelphia site. Gap
analysis has been completed and process
documentation is underway as of March, 1997.
ISO 14000 is being pursued in an attempt to gain
competitive advantage, to reduce risk in
environmental programs by establishing
consistent and repeatable processes, to reduce
dependence on personality-driven environmental
programs, and to establish a framework for
managing environmental impacts.
Addr: Sondra Gutkind
Naval Surface Warfare Center,
Carderock Division
Philadelphia, PA 19112-5083
Tel: 215-897-7828
Fax: 215-897-7030
E-mail: gutkind@oasys.dtnavy.mil
DEPARTMENT OF
ENERGY (DOE)
Energy Facilities Contractors
Group (EFCOG) ISO 14000
Working Group
EFCOG is a self-directed group of senior level
contractor executives who manage and operate
DOE laboratories, manufacturing and production
facilities, and environmental restoration projects.
EFCOG member companies have joined together
for the purpose of exchanging management and
technical information in areas of mutual interest.
EFCO's objective is to promote, coordinate,
facilitate, encourage, and support information
exchanges between facilities on successful
programs, practices, procedures, and lessons
learned. The ISO 14000 Working Group (ISO
14000 WG) is a working committee whose
intent is to facilitate the objectives of EFCOG as
related to the particular area of EMS. The
purposes of the ISO 14000 WG include
promoting excellence in DOE EMS by sharing
information and lessons learned, facilitating the
exchange of information and experiences in
implementing the ISO 14000 series of EMS
standards, and communicating the implications
for integrating strategic environment, safety, and
health management programs into the daily
operations at DOE sites. Working group
participation will provide EFCOG member
companies the opportunity to exchange
information and to discuss the benefits of ISO
14000.
Addr: Larry Stirling
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Environmental Policy and
Assistance, EH-41
1000 Independence Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20585
Tel: 202-586-2417
3-4
-------
Fax: 202-586-0955
E-mail: john.stirling@hq.doe.gov
Addr: George D. Greenly, Jr., CCM, QEP,
Chairman
BatteUe-Pantex
P.O. Box 30020 (12-132)
Amarillo, TX 79120-0020
Tel: 806-477-5955
Fax: 806-477-5518
E-mail: ggreenly@pantex.com
Addr: Diane Meier, Vice Chair
Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratory
L-197
20201 Century Boulevard, First Floor
Germantown, MD 20874
Tel: 301-916-7719
Fax: 301-916-7777
E-mail: meier6@Unl.gov
EMS Fact Sheets
DOE's Office of Environmental Policy and
Assistance is developing a series of fact sheets
addressing topics related to EMS. The fact
sheets provide basic information and
communicate DOE's approach to EMS issues.
Topics in the series consist of frequently asked
questions; getting started; EPA's Code of
Environmental Management Principles (CEMP);
identifying environmental aspects and impacts;
and pollution prevention. APNNLteamis
supporting the project
Addr: Larry Stirling
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Environmental Policy and
Assistance, EH-41
1000 Independence Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20585
Tel: 202-586-2417
Fax: 202-586-0955
E-mail: john.stirUng@hq.doe.gov
Addr: Dr. Jean Shorett
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
901 D Street, SW
Suite 900
Washington, DC 20024-2115
Tel: 202-646-7809
Fax: 202-646-7838
E-mail: je_shorett@pnl.gov
Environmental Management
Systems at DOE
DOE's Office of Environmental PoUcy and
Assistance (EH-41) is actively evaluating uses of
the ISO 14001 EMS Standard in improving the
environmental sensitivity of DOE operations.
This effort comprises an expanding Ust of
activities, such as drafting and releasing a
Secretarial memorandum encouraging ISO
14001 use in the field; integrating EMS with
DOE's Integrated Safety Management System;
preparing EMS guidance documents and fact
sheets; raising awareness through panel
discussions, invited presentations, conferences,
white papers, and briefings; integrating EMS
with National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), poUution prevention, and contract
reform; organizing an internal EMS Work
Group, a baseline survey of EMS awareness at
DOE facilities, ISO 14001 training and technical
assistance to sites; working with DOE's Energy
Facility Contractor Group and posting a Web site
on ISO activities Unked to DOE's home page.
DOE is also coUaborating with EPA on EMS
issues. DOE also works with EPA's Office of
Federal FaciUties Enforcement to produce an
EMS Primer for Federal FaciUties, co-chairs an
EMS Lnteragency Working Group with EPA's
Mary McKiel, and provides review and comment
on CEMP, which DOE has endorsed.
Addr: Larry Stirling
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Environmental Policy and
Assistance, EH-41
1000 Independence Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20585
Tel: 202-586-2417
Fax: 202-586-0955
E-mail: john.stirUng@hq.doe.gov
EMS Primer for Federal
Facilities
3-5
-------
Please see Chapter 2, Headquarters Initiatives,
Office of Federal Facilities Enforcement, for full
listing.
Implementation of ISO 14001 at
Westinghouse-ManagedDOE Sites.
Westinghouse is reviewing and modifying its
environmental management systems to ensure
they conform to the ISO 14001 standard at three
sites it manages for the Department of Energy:
the Savannah River Site, near Aiken, SC; the
West Valley Demonstration Project, near West
Valley, NY; and the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant,
near Carlsbad, NM. A fourth operation, Safe
Sites of Colorado (a Westinghouse and Babcox
and Wilcox joint venture), is also working to
ensure its EMS conforms to the standard. Safe
Sites of Colorado is a subcontractor for Kaiser-
Hill, the integrating contractor for the DOE at its
Rocky Hats site near Golden, CO.
Addr: Larry Stirling
Department of Energy
Office of Environmental Policy and
Assistance, EH-41
1000 Independence Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20585
Tel; 202-586-2417
Fax: 202-86-0955
E-mail: john.stirling@hq.doe.gov
Addr: Tom DuPlessis
Westinghouse Electric Corporation
Environmental Affairs Department,
Government ES&H Programs
11 Stanwix Street, Room 2181
Pittsburgh, PA 15222-1384
Tel: 412-642-3990
Fat; 412-642-3224
E-mail: dupleste@westinghouse.com
Strategic and Program Planning for EMS
Initiatives. DOE has been a leader in evaluating
uses of the ISO 14001 EMS Standard in
improving management of its environmental
activities. Initiatives consist of EMS strategic
and program planning; linking EMS to other
agency initiatives (e.g., integrated Environmental
Health & Safety, NEPA, pollution prevention);
using ISO 14001 in streamlining internal
directives; analyzing statutory and regulatory
impacts; preparing EMS technical materials;
developing program and field implementation
strategies; developing fact sheets, briefings, and
guidance materials; coauthoring technical
papers; preparing presentations; and supporting
internal and interagency EMS working groups.
Since 1994, a PNNL team has provided support
in developing these activities.
Addr: Larry Stirling
U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Environmental Policy and
Assistance, EH-41
1000 Independence Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20585
Tel: 202-586-2417
Fax: 202-586-0955
E-mail: john.stirling@hq.doe.gov
Addr: Dr. Jean Shorett
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
901 D Street, SW
Suite 900
Washington, DC 20024-2115
Tel: 202-646-7809
Fax: 202-646-7838
E-mail: je_shorett@pnl.gov
DEPARTMENT OF
US-Asia Environmental
Partnership (US-AEP)
Led by the United States Agency for
International Development (USAID), US-AEP
was founded in 1992 to assist in addressing
environmental degradation and sustainable
development issues in the Asia/Pacific region by
mobilizing U.S. environmental experience,
technology, and practice. The program brings
together 25 U.S. government departments and
agencies and thousands of businesses and
nongovernmental organizations that work with
35 nations and territories in Asia and the Pacific.
US-AEP activities focus on the objective of
3-6
-------
promoting an Asian "clean revolution" the
extensive continuing development and adoption
of continuously less polluting and more resource
efficient products, processes, and services in the
Asian region. While individual US-AEP
activities seek practical solutions to local
problems, the cumulative effort positively affects
global environmental issues.
Addr: Lewis P. Reade, Director General
US-Asia Environmental Partnership
U.S. Agency for International
Development
Department of State
Washington, DC 20523
Tel: 202-647-5806
Fax: 202-647-1805
E-mail: lreade@usaid.gov
URL: http://www.usaep.org
US-AEP Clean Technology and
Environmental Management Initiative
(CTEM). Under this initiative, US-AEP works
with Asian governments, industries, professional
associations, and trade academic institutions to
promote cleaner methods of production.
Activities focus on incentives that persuade
companies to refine environmental practices;
enhancing the capacity of those businesses to
respond to incentives; and the transfer of
technology that takes advantage of the incentives
and capacities within a given business, industrial
sector or country. Through consultations,
seminars, workshops, and exchanges, these
activities promote the understanding and
adoption of voluntary standards for corporate
environmental management.
Addr: Julie Haines, Managing Director,
CTEM
U.S.-Asia Environmental Partnership
1720 Eye Street, Suite 700
Washington, DC 20006
Tel: 202-835-0333
Fax: 202-835-0366
E-mail: jhaines@usaep.org
URL: http://www.usaep.org
US-AEP Clean Technology and
Environmental Management Information
Centers (CTEM). CTEM Information Centers
provide accurate and timely information to the
Asian business community. Each center is
staffed with an information specialist who uses
in-house print and electronic resources, the
Internet, and personal contacts to promote the
CTEM concept
Addr: Mr. Enrico Rubio, Information
Specialist
G/F DAP Building
San Miguel Avenue, Pasig City
Metro Manila, 1601, Philippines
Tel: +63-2-635-2650
Fax: +63-2-631-5714
E-mail: ctem@mnl.cyb-live.com
Addr: Ms. Kavita Gandhi, Information
Specialist
SMA House
20 Orchard Road #02-00
Singapore 238830
Tel: +65-338-8787/331-1586 (DID)
Fax: +65-338-5906
E-mail: ctemsin@pacific.net.sg
Addr: Kerith McFadden, Information
Specialist
1720 Eye Street, NW, Suite 600
Washington, DC 20006
Tel: 202-835-8357
Fax: 202-496-9720
E-mail: kmcfadden@usaep.org
US-AEP Environmental Exchange Program
(EEP). US-AEP'sEEP provides Asian
professionals and organizations with
opportunities for addressing critical -
environmental needs by identifying sources for
U.S. technology, observing and evaluating
facilities first-hand for their suitability, meeting
with potential partners, and conferring with U.S.
government and industry authorities. The
program helps link leading ISO 14000 experts in
the United States to top 5 industry leaders and
environmental professionals in Asia to discuss
EMS standards and their implications for
industry.
3-7
-------
Addr: Administrative Manager
Institute of International Education
1400 K Street, NW Suite 650
Washington, DC 20005-2403
Tel: 202-326-7706
Fax: 202-326-7709
E-mail: eep@iie.org
URL: http://www.usaep.org
FOOD AND DRUG
ADMINISTRATION
(FDA)
Standards Policy Committee
The Standards Policy Committee is composed of
senior EDA management officials who set
agency-wide policy with respect to the
development and use of standards. FDA
employees actively participate with a variety of
private standards organizations, both domestic
and international. EDA develops product
standards, criteria for the assessment of test data,
and enforcement procedures, and also includes
ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 for quality and
environment management system registration.
Addr: Linda Horton, Director of International
Policy
EDA / Office of Policy
5600 Rshers Lane, Room 15-74 (HF-23)
Rockvffle, MD 20857
Tel: 301-827-3344
Fax: 301^43-6906
E-mail: lhorton@bangate.fda.gov
URL: http://www/fda.gov
FEDERAL TRADI
COMMISSION
CFTC)
Environmental Marketing
Claims Guidelines
These 1992 guides are administrative
interpretations of laws administered by the FTC
to help public comply with the law covering
environmental marketing claims. Inconsistent
conduct may result in corrective action taken by
the FTC under §5 of the FTC Act, which
prohibits false or deceptive claims in advertising
or labeling. The guidelines focus on what
environmental claims mean to consumers and
are meant to bolster consumers' confidence in
environmental claims and reduce manufacturers
uncertainty about which claims might lead to
FTC law enforcement actions. The guidelines
address general environmental benefit claims
and the use of terms such as degradate,
recyclable, recycled, source reduction, refillable,
and ozone-safe claims.
Addr: Michael Dershowiitz
Federal Trade Commission
Division of Advertising Practices
601 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20580
Tel: 202-326-3158
Fax: 202-326-3259
URL: http://www.ftc.gov
U.S. POSTAL.
Development of ISO
9000/14000 Protocol for Fleet
Maintenance Activities
USPS - Southeast Area is in the initial stage of
developing an ISO protocol that will blend the
quality improvement aspect of ISO 9000 with
the environmental improvements associated with
ISO 14000.
The USPS's Southeast Area fleet management
organization provides operations and
maintenance support to approximately 25,000
USPS-owned vehicles assigned throughout a
five-state area. By combining ISO 9000 and ISO
14000 protocol, USPS anticipates providing a
more uniform, cost effective process of fleet
3-8
-------
management while improving the
environmentally sensitive aspects of operating a
large commercial fleet.
Developing this protocol should begin in early
1997, with :first article" roll out anticipated in
Fall 1997.
Addr. Robert Martin
Southeast Area Office - USPS
225 N. Humphreys Boulevard
Memphis, TN 38166-0860
Tel: 901-747-7635
Fax: 901-747-7482
3-9
-------
-------
INITIATIVES
State governments are examining ISO 14000 and its relevance to state environmental complaince
and permitting activities. States are also providing technical assistance to organizations interested
in ISO 14000. Besides the initiatives directly managed by state governmental agencies, this
chapter includes other geographically based initiatives such as those of the national Institute of
Standards manufacturing Extension partnership Centers.
1. Alphabetical Listings by State
-------
-------
MULT I -STATE
WORK GROUP
The Multi-State Work Group on environmental
management systems includes representatives
from California, Texas, Oregon, Arizona,
Illinois, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania,
Massachusetts, and North Carolina. The Work
Group has prepared a voluntary project design
document, including a Project Evaluation
Matrix, which can be used by states and others
in the design of projects involving ISO 14001.
Addr: Dr. Robert Stephens
CAL/EPA
Dept of Toxic Substances Control
Hazardous Materials Laboratory
2151 Berkeley Way, Room 515
Berkeley, CA 94704
Tel: 510-540-3003
Fax: 510-540-2305
ALABAMA
Department of Environmental
Management
Alabama is in the preliminary stages of
investigating possible application.
Addr: Richard E. Grusnick, Deputy Director
Alabama Department of Environmental
Management
P.O. Box 301463
Montgomery, AL 36130-1463
Tel: 334-271-7710
Fax: 334-271-7950
E-mail: adem@state.al.us
ISO 14000 Infrastructure
Development
Westark College Business and Industrial
Institute is partnering with the Arkansas
Department of Pollution Control and Ecology to
develop ISO 14000 teaming. This training will
support efforts of Arkansas companies to
develop and implement EMS that can be
certified to ISO 14000.
Addr: Mike Jones
Westark College
P.O. Box 3649
5210 Grand Avenue
Ft. Smith, AR 72413-3649
Tel: 501-788-7763
Fax: 501-788-7780
E-mail: mjones@systema.westark.edu
CALIFORNIA
CAL/EPA ISO 14000 Pilot
Project
CAL/EPA will conduct two to four pilot
demonstration projects to test and evaluate the
utility of an EMS in achieving and maintaining
compliance with regulatory requirements,
continuing environmental improvement, and
streamlining regulatory procedures.
Addr: Robert Stephens, Chair
CAL/EPA Task Force on ISO 14000
Department of Toxic Substances Control
Hazardous Materials Laboratory
2151 Berkeley Way, Room 515
Berkeley, CA 94704
Tel: 510-540-3003
Fax: 510-540-2305
San Francisco Bay Area
Green Business Program
Businesses in full environmental compliance
with relevant multimedia regulations (air, land,
and water) and meeting program defined,
industry-specific standards for energy and water
conservation, solid waste reduction, and
pollution prevention will be recognized as
"green." After local governments certify the
company as green, it may then use the program
4-1
-------
logo in its advertising to attract environmentally
conscious consumers. This program does not
include standards for an EMS per se.
Addr: Jennifer Krebs, Senior Environmental
Planner
Association of Bay Area Governments
Oakland, CA 94604
Tel: 510-464-7977
Fax: 510-464-7980
E-mail: jenniferk@abag.ca.gov
COLORADO
Pollution Prevention Program
The Colorado Department of Public Health and
Environment has included ISO 14000 as a
possible criterion in a proposed program that
would reduce government oversight and provide
financial incentives to companies who excel in
environmental performance.
Addr: Parry Burnap
Pollution Prevention Program
OE B2 PPU Colorado Department of
Public Health and Environment
4300 Cherry Creek Drive North
Denver, CO 80222-1530
Tel: 303-692-3009
Fax: 303-782-4969
E-mail: parry.burnap@state.co.us
CONNECTICUT
Common Sense Initiative, and
StarTrack Pilot Project
As part of EPA's Common Sense Initiative,
Environmental Leadership Program and
StarTrack Initiatives in Connecticut, the state of
Connecticut is participating hi pilot projects that
focus on EMS and ISO 14000.
Addr: Robert Kaliszewski, Ombudsman
State of Connecticut, DEP
79 Elm Street
Hartford, CT 06106-5127
Tel: 860-424-3003
Fax: 860-424-4077
E-mail: robert.kaliszewski@po.state.ctus
URL: http://www.state.ct.us/dep
Department of Natural
Resources
Delaware is tracking and Investigating ISO
14000 activities of other interested states.
Addr. Nicholas A. DiPasquale, Director
Division of Air & Waste Management
Delaware Department of Natural
Resources
P.O. Box 1401
89 Kings Highway
Dover, DE 19903
Tel: 302-739-4764
Fax: 302-739-5060
E-mail: ndipasquale@dnrec.state.de.us
FLORIDA
Florida Department of
Environmental Protection
(FDEP)
EMS help ensure compliance with state and
federal regulations and requirements, and can
serve as a mechanism to guide improvement in
environmental performance. FDEP is working
closely with the business community to foster a
cooperative spirit of putting well-crafted EMS in
place.
Addr. Michael Phillips
FDEP
3900 Commonwealth Boulevard (18)
Tallahassee, FL 32399-3000
Tel: 904-921-9717
Fax: 904-488-7093
E-mail: phillips_M@epic9.dep.state.fl.us
4-2
-------
URL: http://www.dep.state.fl.us
Pollution Prevention
Assistance Division (P2AD)
P2AD provides industry within the state
information regarding ISO 14000. This is done
through P2AD newsletters, assessments, and
participation in industry conferences.
Addr: Matt Barcaskey
Georgia P2AD
7 Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive,
Suite 450
Atlanta, GA 30334
Tel: 404-651-5120
Fax: 404-651-5130
E-mail: p2ad@ix.netcom.com
URL: http://www.dnr.state.ga.us
IDAHO
Idaho Manufacturing
Alliance
The executive director currently conducts ISO
14000 training workshops across the state of
Idaho.
Addr: Jim Steinfort, Executive Director
Idaho Manufacturing Alliance
Boise State University
1910 University Drive
Boise, ID 83725
Tel: 208-385-3689
Fax: 208-385-3877
E-mail: jsteinf@idbsu.bsu.edu
INDIANA
Small Business Pilot Project
The Indiana Department of Environmental
Management (IDEM) and EPA plan to undertake
three to five pilot projects as part of the
thermoset plastics sector of the Sustainable
Industry Project. The project has three distinct
goals: 1) to identify the problems faced by small
businesses trying to implement an EMS, 2) to
identify the infrastructure and support needed by
small businesses for EMS implementation, and
3) to demonstrate a new regulatory regime for
small businesses.
IDEM and EPA have identified project resources
to help small businesses through the project,
including a) an IDEM grants program that in
place will help offset some of the costs in
implementing an EMS; b) technical assistance
from DDEM's Compliance and Technical
Assistance Program; c) additional technical
assistance from the Indiana Pollution Prevention
and Safe Materials Institute at Purdue
University; d) regional EPA technical assistance
from EPA Region 5; and, e) reporting and
permitting flexibility from IDEM and EPA.
Addr: Marc Hancock
Indiana Department of Environmental
Management
100 North Senate Avenue
P.O. Box 6015
Indianapolis, IN 46206
Tel: 317-233-1043
Fax: 317-233-5627
E-mail: mhanc@opn.dem.state.in.us
URL:
http://www.epa.gov/oppe/isd/indiana.htm
Addr: Carl Koch
U.S. EPA, OPPE
401 M Street, SW
Washington, DC 20460
Tel: 202-260-2739
Fax: 202-260-9322
E-mail: koch.carl@epamail.epa.gov
URL: http-y/www.epa.gov/oppe/isd/isd.htm
IOWA
4-3
-------
Iowa Waste Reduction Center
(1WRC) EMS Assistance
Program
The IWRC provides ISO 14001 EMS
development assistance to small businesses in
Iowa.
Addr. Marci Carter
University of Northern Iowa
75 Biology Research Complex
Cedar Falls, IA 50614-0185
Tel: 319-273-2079
Fax: 319-273-2926
E-mail: carterm@uni.edu
URL: http//www.iwrc.uni.edu
Waste Reduction Assistance
Program (WRAP)
Through on-site assessments, workshops, and
continual support, WRAP provides
nonregulatory, confidential, no-cost assistance
designed to reduce wastes and enhance a
company's bottom line. The program targets
Iowa business and industry with more than 100
employees or those classified as RCRA large
quantity generators.
Addr: Beth Hicks
Iowa Department of Natural Resources
900 East Grand Avenue
DesMoines.IA 50309
Tel: 515-281-8927
Fax: 515-281-8895
E-mail: chicks @max.state.ia.us.
URL: http://www.recyclelowa.org
Environmental Management
System
K.S.A. 60-332 et seq., enacted by the 1995
Kansas legislature, outlines the components of
art EMS. If a finding of violation occurs, a
facility that has implemented an EMS is afforded
consideration by the court or administrative
tribunal in determining whether to impose an
administrative, civil, or criminal penalty and the
severity of the penalty. The Kansas Department
of Health and Environment is actively
encouraging facilities to implement EMS.
Addr: Theresa Hedges
Kansas Department of Health and
Environment
Office of Science and Support
Building 283, Forbes Field
Topeka, KA 66620
Tel: 913-296-6603
Fax: 913-291-3266
KENTUCKY
Kentucky Pollution Prevention
Center's (KPPC) ISO 14000
Awareness
KPPC is facilitating ISO 14000 training through
contractors, partnerships with other assistance
providers, and by downlinking national
teleconferences. It has sponsored/presented two
2-day workshops in Louisville and Lexington,
KY. In addition, two 3-hour teleconferences
were downlinked in those two cities in October
1996. A presentation titled "An Overview of
ISO 14000" has been offered at conferences and
lecture series statewide. KPPC will continue to
provide training opportunities for
Commonwealth business as well as further
identify its role in ISO 14000 implementation.
Addr: Cam Metcalf, Executive Director
Kentucky Pollution Prevention Center
420 New Academic Building
University of Louisville
Louisville, KY 40292
Tel: 502-852-0965
Fax: 502-852-0964
E-mail: jcmetcOl @ulkyvm.louisville.edu
URL: httpy/wwwAouisville.edu/org/kppc
4-4
-------
LOUISIANA
Department of Environmental
Quality
Environmental Leadership/ISO 14000. The
Louisville Department of Environmental Quality
(LDEQ) Office of Secretary is developing an
Environmental Leadership Program/ISO 14000
initiative for Louisiana's business and industry.
A coordinator provides consultation and
workshops to educate interested parties
regarding U.S. government policy regarding ISO
14000, including environmental management
systems (EMS).
Addr: Gary Johnson/Hugh Finklea
Louisiana Department of
Environmental Quality
P.O. Box 82263
Baton Rouge, LA 70884-2263
Tel: 504-765-0720
Fax: 504-765-0742
E-mail: gary_j@deq.state.la.us
Environmental Leadership
Pollution Prevention Program
This is a cooperative effort between the
Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality
and Louisiana's industry that encourages
companies to assume environmental leadership
roles by committing to minimizrng their waste
streams in all media, and participating in
activities to enhance Louisiana's environment.
Addr: Charles Killebrew, Technical
Manager
Technical Program Support Section
Louisiana Department of
Environmental Quality
Office of the Secretary
P.O. Box 82263
Baton Rouge, LA 70884-2263
Tel: 504-765-0720
Fax: 504-765-0742
MAINE
Department of Environmental
Protection (DEP)
As a component of the state's Environmental
Excellence: Maine Program, DEP works with
businesses developing EMS (including ISO
14000) to review gap analyses and provide
compliance assistance and regulatory review as
the plans are developed.
Addr: Ron Dyer
Maine DEP
STP #17
Augusta, ME 04333
Tel: 207-287-2811
Fax: 207-287-2814
E-mail: ron.e.dyer@state.me.us
Center for Technology
Transfer (CTT)
Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing
(ECM) Program. CTT is a private nonprofit
organization that works primarily with Maine's
metals and electronics industries to enhance
their competitiveness through training,
technology transfer, and technical assistance.
ECM is one of CTT's focus areas; pollution
prevention assessments, training, development
literature, conferences, and seminars were all
initiated under this program over the last 2 years.
CTT will work with its target industries to
educate companies on EMS and why they may
or may not want to become certified to ISO
14001.
Addr: Mark Arienti, P.E., Field Engineer
ECM Project
Center for Technology Transfer
190 Riverside Street
Portland, ME 04103
Tel: 207-871-8254
Fax: 207-780-1547
E-mail: marienti@mstf.org
URL: http://www.ctt.org
4-5
-------
EMS Development for Industry
- Electric Power Sector
The Central Maine Power Company and the
Natsionalna Elektricheska Kompania of Bulgaria
are working on a U.S. AID-funded effort to
develop EMS for major power plants in Bulgaria
and for the central electric utility system.
Bulgaria has adopted environmental standards
similar to those of western Europe and the
United States, however, both the plant
equipment and the management systems are
dated in terms of being able to meet these
standards. This initiative will help the
management side of environmental businesses.
One major power plant was selected for system
development; at the discretion of the Natsionalna
Elektricheska Kompania, the EMS techniques
will be transferred to the rest of the system.
Addr: James H. Wazlaw
Central Maine Power International
One Grandview Place
Winthrop, ME 04364
Tel: 207-626-9749
Fax: 207-626-959
Addr: Hristo Shwabsky
Natsionalna Elektricheska Kompania
Sofia, Bulgaria
Tel: 359 2 980 1968
Fax: 359 2 875826
E-mail: nek.s.msp @mcrl .poptel.org.uk
Addr: Dr. Robert Ichord, Jr.
U.S.AID
320 21st Street NW
Washington, DC 20523
Tel: 202-647-6962
Fax: 202-647-8274
(Cross-listed with International Initiatives,
chapter 6)
MARYLAND
Maryland Department of the
Environment (MDE)
MDE conducts various ISO 14000 training
programs for management and field personnel.
Addr: Mitch McCalmon
Maryland Department of the
Environment
2500 Broening Highway
Baltimore, MD 21224
Tel: 410-631-4499
Fax: 410-631-3896
ISO 14000 Awareness for
Maryland Manufacturers
Various agencies, public and private
organizations in Maryland are making significant
strides in identifying and providing ISO 14000
related information and awareness training
throughout Maryland. The Environmental
Engineering Program of the University of
Maryland's Engineering Research Center (ERC)
has begun an initiative to assist these efforts,
identifying potentially interested participants,
promoting the program, and assisting with
presentation as requested. Primary efforts to date
have been with the regional offices of the ER's
Technology Extension Service (an affiliate of the
Maryland NISTMEP), the Maryland Department
of the Environment, and various local
technology councils.
Addr: Paul Gietka
University of Maryland at Baltimore
618 West Lombard Street, 1st Floor
Baltimore, MD 21201
Tel: 410-706-3233
Fax: 410-706-3446
E-mail: pg26@umail.umd.edu
MICHIGAN
Clean Corporate Citizen
Program
4-6
-------
This program gives businesses tangible
incentives and benefits, such as faster permits,
expanded construction and operational waivers,
and plantwide applicable limits for air permits.
Such benefits are attainable by meeting three
criteria: 1) a demonstrated commitment to
reduce waste through a pollution prevention
program; 2) consistent compliance with all
environmental requirements and no outstanding
unresolved violations; and 3) a strong and
effective EMS such as ISO 14001.
Addr: Robert Basch, Chief
Technical Assistance Section,
Environmental Assistance Division
Department of Environmental Quality
P.O. Box 30457
Lansing, MI 48909-7957
Tel: 517-335-7161
Fax: 517-373-3675
E-mail: baschr@deq.state.mi.us
MINNESOTA
Office of Attorney General
EMS Training. The initiative involves two
projects designed to improve EMS training. The
first project involves a series often seminars on
various aspects of environmental management
including ISO 14000; the primary audience is
larger businesses. The second project focuses on
smaller businesses and will include five separate
training sessions that incorporate environmental
management elements into small business
manufacturing excellence programs.
Banking/Insurance Initiative. This is an effort
to identify the risk reduction and
competitiveness advantages of good EMS and to
inform bankers, insurers, and investors of these
advantages. ISO 14000 certification and
implementation could conceivably be used as a
tool in measuring likely improved performance.
Addr: Lee Paddock
Office of Attorney General
900 NCL Tower
445 Minnesota Street
St. Paul, MN 55101-2127
Tel: 612-296-6597
Fax: 612-297-4139
E-mail: lee.paddock@state.mn.us
MISSOURI
ISO 14000 Cooperation
Project
This project supports research and educational
activities within Missouri state government and
with nongovernmental groups, including a joint
relationship with the National Center for
Environmental and Information Technology in
St. Louis.
Addr:
and
Tel:
Fax:
Steve Mahfood
Missouri Environmental Improvement
Energy Resources Authority
P.O. Box 744
325 Jefferson
Jefferson City, MO 65101
573-751-4919
573-635-3486
Department of Environmental
Quality (NDEQ)
Quality Assurance Implementation for Technical
Policy and Independent Technical Oversight of
Low Level Radioactive Wastes Application.
NDEQ has the regulatory oversight and licensing
authority, hi conjunction with the Nebraska
Health and Human Services (HHS), for licensing
commercial low level waste disposal under
1OXFR Part 61 hi the state of Nebraska. NDEQ
was charged with license review and
independent technical assessment under NDEQ
title 132 and NDOH Titie 180. NDEQ
developed a comprehensive quality assurance
program using NUREG 1293/NUREG 1383 and
NQA-1. The program incorporates requirements
to address NRC Reg. Guide 415. Over a seven
year period, the quality assurance
implementation has been successfully
4-7
-------
implemented to over 200 personnel and covers
all elements of technical review and oversight
process. NDEQ has successfully implemented a
"graded approach" to audits and surveillance
that had never been implemented to this level for
license review. It is unique for government
oversight for state regulatory license review.
Addr: Jay D. Ringenberg, LLRW Program
Manager
Nebraska Department of
Environmental Quality
P.O. Box 98922
1200 N Street, Suite 400, The Atrium
Lincoln, NE 68509-8922
Tel: 402-471-3372
Fax: 402-471-2909
NEW
HAMPSHIRE
New Hampshire Pollution
Prevention Program (NHPPP)
This nonregulatory pollution prevention program
offers technical assistance services such as
conferences and workshops, information
requests, onsite assistance, pollution prevention
information clearinghouse, internships,
educational curricula, pollution prevention
regulatory integration, and strategic partnerships.
Addr: Vincent R. Perelli, NHPPP Manager
New Hampshire Department of
Environmental Services Pollution
Prevention Program
6 Hazen Drive
Concord, NH 03301-6509
Tel: 603-271-2902
Fax: 603-271-2456
E-mail: perelli@deswmdpl.mv.com
NEW MEXICO
Green Zia Environmental
Excellence Program
The Green Zia program will recognize
businesses, institutions, and governmental
entities that have met specific criteria for
achieving environmental excellence: 1) long-
term compliance with all environmental
regulations and development of a pollution
prevention plan; 2) achievement of specified
pollution prevention goals outlined in the plan;
and 3) achievement of additional goals and
mentorship in pollution prevention technologies
for other businesses, institutions or
governmental entities. The criteria for receiving
recognition will be developed with input from
regulators and industry representatives, and will
include ISO 14000 confonnance. The program
should be implemented in mid-1997.
Addr: Judy KowalsM
Forestry and Resources Conservation
Division
Energy, Minerals, and Natural
Resources Department
P.O. Box 1948
Santa Fe, NM 87504-1948
Tel: 505-827-7474
Fax: 505-827-3903
E-mail: jkowalski@emnrdsf.state.nm.us
NEW YORK
ISO 14000 Regulatory
Integration Pilot Program
The Department of Environmental Conservation
is developing two pilot projects wilh. one small
business and one large business to explore how
ISO 14000 certification can be incorporated into
regulatory oversight programs.
Addr: William Eberle
NYSDEC
50 Wolf Road
Albany, NY 12233-8010
Tel: 518-457-2553
Fax: 518-457-2570 '
4-8
-------
NORTH
CAROLINA
The North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Environmental Management Systems. The
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources has formed a
workgroup to look at the use of EMS.
Specifically, the group will be involved in pilot
projects, internal training, gaining support of
external groups, and policy development.
Addr: Ravila Gupta
North Carolina Department of
Environment, Health and Natural
Resources
P.O. Box 29569
Raleigh, NC 27626
Tel: 919-715-6507
Fax: 919-715-6794
E-mail: ravila_gupta@owr.ehnr.state.nc.us
ISO 14000 Workgroup for the National P2
Roundtable. The first official meeting of this
group was held in November 1996 as part of the
National Pollution Prevention (P2) Roundtable's
regular workgroup meetings. Some example
issues addressed were: How can P2 mesh with
the standard? Will P2 be included in the auditor
training and if so, how? What is the role of
technical assistance personnel? Can small- and
medium-sized manufacturers benefit from ISO
14000 and what are some of their
implementation issues? Will the standard lead to
source reduction? This workgroup will generate
and maintain an ISO 14000 e-mail list.
Addr: Ravila Gupta
P.O. Box 29569
Raleigh, NC 27626
Tel: 919-715-6507
Fax: 919-715-6794
E-mail: ravila_gupta @ owr.ehnr.state.nc.us
Addr: Krista Johnsen Leuteritz
NIST/MEP
Building 301, Room C-100
Gaithersburg, MD 20899
Tel: 301-975-5104
Fax: 301-926-3787
E-mail: kristin.johnsen@nist.gov
URL: http://www.mep.nist.gov/
NORTH DAKOTA
Wetland Conservation
Strategy
This multifunctional program includes a variety
of incentive programs and demonstrations to
encourage restriction and preservation of the
state's substantial wetland resources.
Addr: Lee Klapprodt
North Dakota State Water
Commission
900 East Bird
Bismarck, ND 58501
Tel: 701-328-2750
Fax: 701-328-3696
E-mail: lklap@water.swc.state.nd.us
URL: http://water.swc.state.nd.us
OHIO
ISO 14000 Information
Gathering
The Ohio Office of Pollution Prevention is
presently gathering information about the ISO
14000 series of voluntary standards.
Addr: Andrea Futrell
Ohio EPA
Office of Pollution Prevention
P.O. Box 1049
Columbus, OH 43216-1049
Tel: 614-644-2813
Fax: 614-726-1245
E-mail: andrea_futreU@central.epa.ohio.gov
URL: http://www.epa.ohio.gov/opp/
4-9
-------
oppmain.html
OKLAHOMA
Department of Environmental
Quality
The Pollution Prevention Program provides
technical assistance to business and industry
across the state of Oklahoma. It also houses a
clearinghouse of up-to-date information on
pollution prevention advances La various
industries, reference materials, and journals.
ISO 14000 activities consist of educating
program members about the standards.
Addr: Leisa Smith
Oklahoma Department of
Environmental Quality
1000 ME 10
Oklahoma City, OK73117-1212
Tel: 405-271-1400 or 800-869-1400
Fax: 405-271-1317
Environmental Action
Agreement Project
The Department of Environmental Quality's
Pollution Prevention Core Committee is
developing the framework of a program that will
provide regulatory incentives for companies that
demonstrate environmental performance beyond
that required by law. Details of how companies
qualify for participation and what types of
rewards will be offered are still being
determined. In order to qualify to be part of the
Environmental Action Agreement Project,
participants must have 1) an EMS in place that
assures compliance with mandated
environmental requirements, 2) some
supplemental activities that demonstrate
protection of the environment beyond that
required by law, and 3) some mechanism for
public communication about the facility's
environmental performance.
Possible rewards include both a recognition
program and some regulatory relief, such as
expedited permit processing, reduced monitoring
and reporting frequency, and enforcement
discretion. A workgroup will convene to
develop these ideas and develop
recommendations for turning pilot efforts into a
full-scale incentive program.
Addr: Holly Schroeder
DEQ Northwest Region
2020 SW Fourth Avenue
Portland, OR 97201
Tel: 503-229-5585
Fax: 503-229-6945
E-mail: holly.schroeder@state.or.us
URL: http://www.deq.state.or.us
Addr: Marianne Fitzgerald, Coordinator
DEQ Pollution Prevention
811 SW Sixth Avenue
Portland, OR 97204
Tel: 503-229-5946
Fax: 503-229-5850
E-mail: marianne.fitzgerald@state.or.us
URL: http://www.deq.state.or.us
PENNSYLVANIA
Strategic Environmental
Management: Beyond
Compliance
Strategic Environmental Management is a
regulatory approach that incorporates ISO 14001
environmental accounting, full life-cycle
assessment, and performance measurements into
a pollution prevention approach to
environmental management.
Addr: Marylou Barton
Department of
Environmental Management
Rachel Carson State Office Building
P.O. Box 8464
Harrisburg, PA 17105-8464
Tel: 717-787-7060
4-10
-------
Fax: 717-787-9378
E-mail: barton.marylou@al.dep.state.pa.us
URL: httpy/www/dep.state.pa.us
Market-Based Audits of EMS:
Implementing ISO 14000
Those conducting the project are studying four
interrelated hypotheses concerning ISO 14000:1)
ISO 14000 will improve public knowledge and
reduce acceptability of industrial activities with
environmental impacts; 2) ISO 14000 will
improve internal management capabilities and
reduce compliance costs for companies over
other environmental management alternatives; 3)
ISO 14000 will improve risk management
practices and will lead to better relations with
insurers and a risk managers and to lower
premiums for certified companies; and 4) ISO
14000 will lead to decreased transaction costs of
regulation, both at the state and federal level. A
series of pilot studies in Wisconsin and
Pennsylvania are planned to test these
hypotheses.
Addr: Paul R. Kleindorfer
Wharton Risk Management and
Decision Processes Center
University of PennsylvaniaAVharton
School
1325 Steinberg-Dietrich Hall
3620 Locust Walk
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6366
Tel: 215-898-5688
Fax: 215-573-2130
E-mail: kleindorfer@wharton.upenn.edu
URL: httpy/opim.wharton.upenn.edu/risk/
Pennsylvania Environmental
Council
The Pennsylvania Environmental Council is a
statewide education, advocacy, and policy
nonprofit organization that is promoting
discussion of ISO 14000 in Pennsylvania
through several mechanisms, including
publication of related articles in a quarterly
newsletter and hosting discussion groups with
representatives of government, business,
industry, and environmental interests.
Addr: Joanne R. Denworth
1211 Chestnut Street, Suite 900
Philadelphia, PA 19107
Tel: 215-563-0250
Fax: 215-563-0528
E-mail: pecphila@libertynet.org
URL: http://www.libertynet.org/~peq3hila
Department of Environment
and Conservation (TDEC)
TDEC is following the development of 1he ISO
14000 standards and potential uses. In addition,
TDEC is participating, as an Environmental
Council of States (ECOS) representative, in
EPA's ISO 14000/EMS Task Group.
Addr: David L. Harbin, Assistant General
Counsel
Department of Environment and
Conservation
Office of General Counsel
L & C Tower, 20th Floor
401 Church Street
Nashville, TN 37243-1548
Tel: 615-532-0144
Fax: 615-532-0145
E-mail: dharbin@mail.state.tn.us
Office of Pollution Prevention
and Recycling
The Office currently oversees multiple projects
analyzing EMS and its application. These
projects include analyzing potential inspection
protocols to incorporate EMS, analyzing the
relationship between EMS and environmental
economic performance in industrial facilities,
and incorporating EMS into voluntary
recognition/incentive programs.
4-11
-------
Addr: Andrew Neblett, Director
Office of Pollution Prevention and
Recycling
Texas Natural Resource Conservation
Commission
P.O. Box 13087 (MCI 12)
Austin, TX 78711-3807
Tel: 512-239-3166
Fax: 512-239-3165
E-mail: aneblett@tnrcc.state.tx.us
UTAH
Department of Environmental
Quality (DEQ)
Utah's pollution prevention program serves as
the contact point for promotion and
dissemination of information related to ISO
14000. The pollution prevention program will
notify other DEQ divisions and industrial groups
and also serve as a contact for communicating
with these groups regarding ISO 14000.
Addr: Sonja F. Wallace
Utah Department of Environmental
Quality
168 North 1950 West
SaltLake City, UT 84114-4810
Tel: 801-536-4477
Fax: 801-536-0061
E-mail: eqoas.swallace@state.ut.us
VERMONT
Vermont Manufacturing
Extension Center (VMEC)
VMEC is a NIST-MEP center serving the
technical assistance needs of Vermont's
manufacturers.
Addr: Muriel Durgin, Director
Tel:
4MFG
Fax:
E-mail:
URL:
Vermont Manufacturing Extension
Center
P.O. Box 500
Randolph Center, VT 05061-0500
802-728-1312; in VT 800-MEP-
802-728-1456 -
vmec@nightvtc.vsc.edu
http y/www. vmec.org
VIRQINIA
Department of Environmental
Quality
Virginia is tracking and investigating ISO
14000 activities of other interested states.
Addr: T. March Bell
Department of Environmental Quality
P.O. Box 10009
Richmond, VA 23240-0009
Tel: 804-698-4417
Fax: 804-698-4019
WASHINCTON
Department of Ecology
Compliance Assurance and Environmental
Audits. Several "Beyond Compliance" related
initiatives that relate to ISO 14000 exist,
including an EPA ISO 14000 task group, an
environmental leadership program, and a
performance based permits system.
Addr: Greg Sorlie, Program Manager
Department of Ecology
P.O. Box 47600
Olympia, WA 98504-7600
Tel: 360-407-6977
Fax: 360-407-6902
E-mail: gsor461 @ ecy.wa.gov
Addr: John Williams, Staff
Department of Ecology
P.O. Box 47600
Olympia, WA 98504-7600
4-12
-------
Tel: 360-407-6968
Fax: 360-407-6902
E-mail: jowi461@ecy.wa.gov
ISO 14000 Leadership Project. This project is
sponsored by EPA Region 10 and the
Washington State Department of Ecology,
working in conjunction with the International
Standards Initiative, to clarify the environmental,
economic, and regulatory benefits of ISO 14001
certification. The project comprises four tasks: 1)
focus group discussions, 2) discussion forum, 3)
EMS analysis, and 4) final report.
Addr: Tom Eaton, Special Assistant to the
Director for Pollution Prevention
Department of Ecology
P.O. Box 1202
Olympia, WA 98504
Tel: 360-407-6086
Fax: 360-407-6989
E-mail: teat461 @ ecy.wa.gov
Addr: John Palmer, Pollution Prevention
Manager
U.S. EPA Region 10
P.O. Box 1202
1200 6th Avenue (01-085)
Seattle, WA 98101
Tel: 206-553-6521
E-mail: paUner.john@epamail.epa.gov
Addr: K.C. Ayers, Executive Director
International Standards Initiative
P.O. Box 1202
Issaquah, WA 98027-1202
Tel: 206-392-7610
Fax: 206-392-7630
E-mail: kcayers@isi-standards.org
URL: http://www.isi-standards.org
WISCONSIN
Wisconsin ISO 14000
Working Group
This group is composed of members of the
public and private sector with extensive
knowledge of ISO 14000. A number of interim
reports have been developed by the group and
will form the basis for a pilot study. The pilot
effort of the Wharton/LaFollette project will be
the same pilot effort as the Wisconsin ISO
14000 Working Group project. Companies are
expected to begin participating in 1997.
Addr: Tom Eggert
* Wisconsin Department of Natural
Resources
P.O. Box 7921 MB/5
Madison, WI53707
Tel: 608-267-2761
Fax: 608-267-5231
E-mail: eggert@dnr.state.wi.us
Wharton/LaFollette Joint
Research Effort
The states of Wisconsin and Pennsylvania are
working together with the Wharton Business
School and the LaFollette Institute of Public
Affairs to identify cost, benefits, and public
policy issues of ISO 14000. The research will be
supplemented by a pilot study, which will test
out assumptions and theories.
Addr: JeffSmoller
Wisconsin Department of Natural
Resources
P.O. Box 7921 MB/5
Madison, WI 53707
Tel: 608-267-5231
Fax: 608-267-5231
E-mail: smolTj@dnr.state.wi.us
Addr: Paul R. Kleindorfer
Wharton Risk Management and
Decision Processes Center
University of Pennsylvania/Wharton
School
1325 Steinberg-Dietrich Hall
3620 Locust Walk
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6366
Tel: 215-898-5830
4-13
-------
Fax: 215-573-2130
E-mail: kleindorfer@wharton.upenn.edu
URL: http://opim.wharton.upenn.edu/risk/
-------
NONPROFIT
INITIATIVES
The nonprofit organizations in this chapter are divided into three sections. An industry section
lists organizations that promote communication about ISO 14000 in their respective industry
sectors. The section on nongovernmental initiatives includes nonprofit organizations representing
stakeholders with an interest in improved environmental performance, as well as nonprofit
organizations that directly provide ISO 14000 related services. Intitiatives based at academic
institutions includes training services, consulting services and the application of the ISO 14000
standards to the academic institutions themselves.
1. Industry Associations and Networks
2. Nongovernmental Organizations
3. Academic Organizations
-------
-------
INDUSTRY
Air & Waste Management
Association (AWMA)
Intercommittee Task Force on
ISO 14000
AWMA's Intercommittee Task Force on ISO
14000 will cosponsor an international forum, in
conjunction with the AWMA 1997 Annual
Conference, to be held in June 1997. The
forum, entitled AISO 14000 Environmental
Management Systems: Where weVe been and
where we're going,® will be held in Toronto,
Canada.
Addr: George D. Greenly, Jr., CCM, QEP
Battelle-Pantex
69001-40 West, Suite 130
Amarillo,TX79106
Tel: 806-353-4198
Fax: 806-353-4628
E-mail: ggreenly@pantex.com
URL: http://www.awma.org
American Petroleum Institute
Strategies for Today's Environmental Partner
ship (STEP). STEP represents the petroleum
industry's collective initiatives to improve
petroleum industry environmental, health., and
safety (EHS) performance, document and
communicate its achievements, and improve the
public's understanding of its performance. STEP
provides a unifying framework, through the
American Petroleum Institute (API), that the
industry can use to improve EHS performance in
a flexible, yet systematic manner; to share best
practices; to enhance operating efficiencies and
reduce costs; and to document performance
improvements.
Many companies, working collectively and
individually, have successfully used
management systems approaches to accomplish
cost-effective improvements on an ongoing
basis. Individual company and industry EHS
performance and efficiency are expected to
improve as a result of successful implementation
of EHS management systems, an expectation
that several API members with EHS
management systems have affirmed. Based on
these successes, API promotes the use of flexible
EHS management systems, which provide a
means for integrating EHS management into
everyday business operations, regardless of
company size. API is developing a template for
an EHS management system that can be used by
its members as a guide for their own systems.
Addr: Walter C. Retzsch
American Petroleum Institute
1220 L Street, NW
Washington, DC 20005
Tel: 202-682-8598
Fax: 202-682-8579
E-mail: step@api.org
URL: http://www.api.org/step/
American Society for Quality
Control (ASQC)
Energy and Environmental Division (EED).
BED produced the first American national
standard on quality assurance for environmental
programs, ANSLASQC E4-1994. Members are
active on several ISO Technical Committees,
including TC 176 and TC 207. EED has been
an active participant in the development of the
ISO 14000 series of EMS.
Addr: John Dew, Vice-Chair
Administrative Services
Lockheed Martin Utilities Services
P.O. Box 1410
Paducah,KY 42001
Tel: 502-441-6759
Fax: 502-441-6103
5-1
-------
E-mail: dewjr@oml.gov
Electronic Industries
Association (EIA)
EIA has organized a variety of educational pro
grams to provide information to members
concerning strategic and practical considerations
applicable to ISO 14000. These education
programs include presentations, seminars, and
documents.
Addr. David Isaacs
Electronic Industries Association
2500 Wilson Boulevard
Arlington, VA 22201-3834
Tel: 703-907-7576
Fax: 703-907-7501
E-mail: disaacs@eia.org
URL: www.eia.org
The Associated Industries of
Massachusetts/Massachusetts
Manufacturing Partnership
ISO 14000 Collaborative
The Associated Industries of Massachusetts is
working with the Massachusetts Manufacturing
Partnership to provide companies with a
comprehensive program designed to prepare for
ISO 14000 registration. The ISO 14000
Collaborative is an innovative program that
provides small manufacturers with the
opportunity to prepare for registration at an
affordable price. The program is led by world
class corporate education professionals
experienced in ISO 14000 training who foUow a
proven method of interactive instruction over a
period of 12 to 14 months.
Addr. Beverly Cadorette
Massachusetts Manufacturing
Partnership
Corporation for Business, Work, and
Learning
101 Summer Street
Boston, MA 02110
Tel: 617-292-5100, ext. 285
Fax: 617-292-5105
E-mail: bcadorette@mmp.bssc.org
URL: http://www.mmpmfg.org
National Association of
Environmental Professionals
(NAEP)
ISO 14000 Working Group. The NAEP ISO
14000 Working Group is composed of NAEP
members from government, industry, the
financial community, and the consulting field
with an inter est in the development and
implementation of ISO 14000 standards. The
group's mission is threefold: 1) to participate in
the development and implementation of the ISO
14000 standards; 2) to promote and facilitate
communication among environmental
professionals on the impacts of these standards;
and 3) to promote the integration of NAEP
ethics, principles, interests, and practices into the
standards.
Addr: Phil Stapleton, Chair
Glover-Stapleton Associates
NAEP
1627 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006
Tel: 202-331-9659
Fax: 202-296-6270
URL: http-y/enfo.com/NAEP
Industrial Designers Society of
America (IDSA)
Environmental Responsibility Section. IDSA's
Environmental Responsibility Section is
dedicated to the exploration of environmentally
responsible design solutions and product
management systems. The tools being explored
include Life Cycle Modeling, Design for the
Environment, Integrating Design with the EMS
5-2
-------
of ISO 14000, and other strategies that may
move society toward a sustain able future.
Addr: John Paul Kusz, IDSA
301 South Home Avenue
Park Ridge, Illinois 60068
Tel: 847-692-9590
Fax: 847-692-9590
E-mail: jpkusz@aol.com
Northeast Business
Environmental Network
(NBEN)
The Forum for Best Management Practices.
The forum will serve as a network providing
examples of best practices for pollution
prevention and compliance management.
Examples include the EPA self-policing
guidelines and ISO 14001. Participants
exchange their best practice examples based on a
summary model consisting often basic features;
the best of these examples will be summarized
and annotated in a manual to be published by
NBEN and posted to NBEN*s Web page. NBEN
fosters sustainable development through the
exchange of practical information in regular
meetings, seminars, and over the Internet.
Raytheon hosted a conference discussing the
forum on November 15,1996, in Lexington,
MA.
Addr: Jennifer Hill
NBEN
56 Island Street
Lawrence, MA 01842
Tel: 508-557-5475
Fax: 508-557-5493
E-mail: execdirector@nben.org
URL: http://www.nben.org.
National Center for
Manufacturing Sciences
(NCMS)
NCMS is a membership organization best de
scribed as a consortium of North American
manufacturing organizations whose main
activity is to put together and manage
cooperative research projects among its member
companies.
Addr. Paul Chalmer
NCMS
3025 Boardwalk Drive
Ann Arbor, MI 48108-3266
Tel: 313-995-4911
Fax: 313-995-1150
E-mail: paul.chalmer@ncms.org
URL: http://www.ncms.org
NON-
CO VER N M ENTAL
ORGANIZATIONS
Alliance for Environmental
Innovation
The Alliance for Environmental Innovation is a
project of the Environmental Defense Fund and
the Pew charitable trusts. The alliance will
develop projects that 1) implement measurable
actions to reduce waste, prevent pollution, and
conserve resources while enhancing business
performance; and 2) create actionable models
and methodologies for other businesses to adopt.
Each project will identify environmental issues,
analyze solutions in the context of functional and
economic needs, refine new methodologies for
reducing environmental impacts, and develop
implementation options.
5-3
-------
Addr. Ralph Earle
Environmental Defense Rind
6 North Market Building
Fanueil Hall Marketplace
Boston, MA 02109
Tel: 617-723-2996
Fax: 617-723-2999
E-mail: ralph@ef.org
American Institute for Pollution
Prevention (AIPP)
AD?P is an educational, not-for-profit
organization that works with trade associations
and professional societies to promote pollution
prevention within industry and throughout
society. Many of AIPP's initiatives involve
EMS. AIPP's annual meeting includes updates
on ISO 14000 and discussions regarding if and
how companies are proceeding with
implementation.
Addr. Julie Fero
American Institute for Pollution
Prevention
1616 P Street NW
Suite 100
Washington, DC 20036
Tel: 202-797-6567
Fax: 202-797-6559
E-mail: cd001001@mindspring.com
URL: http://es.inel.gov/aipp/
Coalition for Environmentally
Responsible Economies
(CERES)
CERES promotes responsible corporate activity
for a safe and sustainable future for our planet
The coalition engages environmental
organizations, the investment community, and
corporations in a dialogue about environmental
performance, both to forge a new and
meaningful dialogue with corporations about the
protection of the planet and to establish a
well-informed public that chooses where to
invest its capital based on environmental, not
just economic, performance. CERES is
promoting the creation of a widely-accepted
mechanism for corporate self-governance that
will maintain business practices consistent with
the idea that economic vitality and
environmental responsibility are compatible.
Addr: Randy Rice
CERES
711 Atlantic Avenue
Boston, MA 02111
Tel: 617-451-0927
Fax: 617^82-2028
E-mail: ceres@igc.apc.org
URL: http://www.ceres.org
Community Nutrition Institute
(CNI)
Joint Policy Dialogue on Trade and the
Environment. CNI is currently hosting a series
of facilitated policy dialogues between the
environmental and business communities in an
effort to promote consensus-based trade and
environmental policy. Dialogue participants
include the U.S. Council for International
Business, DuPont, National Association of
Manufacturing, U.S. Chamber of Commerce,
Chemical Manufacturing Association, and other
concerned business organizations.
Environmental nongovernmental organizations
include the Sierra Club, National Wildlife
Federation, World Wildlife Fund, Center for
International Environmental Law, National
Resources Defense Council, and others.
CNI's trade and environment team is currently
researching and drafting a discussion document
addressing ISO 14000 and the relevant trade and
environment issues related to this topic. The
paper will serve as a basis for a future dialogue
workshop, and copies will be made available
upon request to interested parties outside the
dialogue group
Addr. Deborah Siefertt, Jake Caldwell, or
5-4
-------
Tel-
Fax:
E-mail:
David Wirth
Community Nutrition Institute
910 17th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006
202-776-0595
202-776-0599
cnitrade@ige.apc.org
The Global Environmental
Management Initiative (GEMI)
GEMI is committed to Environmental Health
and Safety excellence throughout the business
community. GEMI's 21 member companies
represent a cross section of industry with over a
million employees and combined annual
revenues exceeding $400 billion. Established in
1990, GEMI is a 501(c)(3) nonorganization.
GEMI produced an ISO 14001 EMS
self-assessment program in March 1996.
Addr: Tammy Marshall, Operations
Manager
1090 Vermont Avenue
NW Third Floor
Washington, DC 20005
Tel: 202-296-7449
Fax: 202-296-7442
E-mail: gemi@worldweb.net
URL: http://www.gemi.org
The Good Neighbor Project for
Sustainable Industries
This project helps to shape stakeholder
participation disclosure, input, and participation
by neighbors and workers by including these
elements in ISO 14000 environmental
management processes.
Addr: Sanford Lewis, Director
P.O. Box 79225
Waverly, MA 02179
Tel: 617-354-1030
Fax: 617-492-1635
E-mail: sanlewis@igc.apc.org
URL: http-y/www.envirolink.org/orgs/gnp
Green Seal Environmental
Partners Program
The program provides Agreen® buying
assistance to businesses concerned about the
environmental impacts of their purchases.
Partners receive comprehensive, expert advice,
including lists of products recommended on the
basis of their environmental impact, product
performance, and packaging. Members include
large and small businesses, universities,
government agencies and nonprofit
organizations; participants number over 1000.
Addr: Michael Shor
Green Seal Environmental Partners
Program
1730 Rhode Island Avenue, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20036-3101
Tel: 202-331-7337
Fax: 202-331-7533
E-mail: greenseal@aol.com
ANS1/GETF ISO 14000
Integrated Solutions (IIS)
The American National Standards Institute
(ANSI) and the Global Environment &
Technology Foundation (GETF) developed this
program to serve as the primary disseminator
and facilitator of ISO 14000 information in the
United States.
IIS is composed of four services: training
(currently being done through a national network
of community colleges), ISO 14000
conferencing, publications, and an on-line
information service, US ON-Line. Each service
promotes awareness, competence, confidence,
5-5
-------
and skills for ISO 14000 implementation in both
public and private sectors.
Addr. Mary Clare Lynch
ANSI
11 West 42nd Street
New York, NY 10036
Tel: 212-642-4956
Fax: 212-598-0023
E-mail: mlyncb.@ansi.org
URL: http://www.ansi.org
Addr. Jacqui Keller
GETF
7010 Little River Turnpike, Suite
2X300
Annandale, VA 22302
Tel: 703-750-6401
Fax: 703-750-6506
URL: http://www.isol4000.org
GETF
GETFis a foundation committed to facilitating
the cooperative integration of enterprise,
technology, and the environment into sustainable
systems in the United States and abroad. GETF
facilitates strategic thinking, supports
environmental policy development, builds
consensus and knowledge sharing, and
encourages partnership building and
collaboration; GETF also provides training and
education about ISO 14000 standards.
Addr. Steve Wassersug, President
GETF
7010 Little River Turnpike
Suite 300
Annandale, VA 22302
Tel: 703-750-6401
Fax: 703-750-6506
E-mail: steve.wassersug@gnet.org
URL: http://www.isol4000.org
Addr. Lynne Rasmussen, Director of Legal
Affairs, GETF
7010 Little River Turnpike, Suite 300
Annandale, VA 22302
Tel: 703-750-6401
Fax: 703-750-6506
E-mail: lynne.rasmussen@gnet.org
URL: http://www.isol4000.org
Green Mountain Institute for
Environmental Democracy
(GMIED)
GMIED provides assistance to regional, state,
and local governments; comparative risk
projects; and place-based initiatives in the
development of environmental indicators and
program measures. GMIED also serves as a
clearinghouse for environmental indicator
reports and activities and produces a bimonthly
newsletter covering environmental management.
Addr. James R. Bernard
GMIED
104 East State Street
Montpelier, VT 05602
Tel: 802-229-6077
Fax: 802-229-6076
E-mail: jbernard@gmied.org
ISO 14000 Legal Issues
Forum
The ISO 14000 Legal Issues Forum was
established by the U.S. Technical Advisory
Group in September 1995 to provide a vehicle of
discussion of legal issues arising in the
implementation of the ISO 14000 series of
standards. Under the co- chairmanship of David
J. Freeman of Battle Fowler LLP and Ira R.
Feldman of GT Strategies and Solutions, the
Forum has grown to a membership of over 200
individuals and organizations. Its members
include both governmental officials and
representatives of nonprofit groups.
The forum meets bimonthly, with each meeting
devoted to addressing a specific topic of interest
to its membership. A participation fee of $75
5-6
-------
entitles members to attend bimonthly meetings
and to receive detailed reports of the
proceedings.
Addr. David Freeman
Battle Fowler LLP
75 East 55th Street
New York, NY 10022
Tel: 212-856-7126
Fax: 212-856-7820
E-mail: dfreeman@battlefowler.com
Addr. Ira Feldman
GT Strategies and Solutions
1300 Connecticut Avenue
Washington, DC 20036
Tel: 202-530-9770
Fax: 202-530-9772
E-mail: I@erols.com
Management Institute for
Environment and Business
(MEB)
Industrial Products, Inc.: Measuring
Environmental Performance (Case Study). In
1993, Industrial Products, Inc., was a highly
diversified privately-held manufacturing
company with two business objectives: increase
return on equity and decrease environmental
impact. This case examines management's
efforts to design and implement a management
system for measuring the impact of its operations
on the environment. The student gains an
understanding of the system, and is asked to
evaluate its effectiveness. The industrial
products management system illuminates the
ISO 14000 series standards. A teaching note is
available.
Addr. Rebekah Paulson
Management Institute for
Environment and Business
1709 New York Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20006
Tel: 202^-34-1980
Fax: 202-737-1510
E-mail: briann@wri.org
URL: httpy/www.wri.org/wri/meb
ISO 14000 Workgroup for the
National P2 Roundtable
The first official meeting of this group was held
in November 1996 as part of the National
Pollution Prevention (P2) Roundtable's regular
workgroup meetings. Some example issues
addressed were: How can P2 mesh with the
standard? Will P2 be included in the auditor
training and if so, how? What is the role of
technical assistance personnel? Can small- and
medium-sized manufacturers benefit from ISO
14000 and what are some of their
implementation issues? Will the standard lead to
source reduction? This workgroup will generate
and maintain an ISO 14000 e-mail list
Addr: Ravila Gupta
P.O. Box 29569
Raleigh, NC 27626
Tel: 919-715-6507
Fax: 919-715-6794
E-mail: ravila_gupta@owr.ehnr.state.nc.us
Addr: Krista Johnsen Leuteritz
NIST/MEP
Building 301, RoomC-100
Gaithersburg, MD 20899
Tel: 301-975-5104
Fax: 301-926-3787
E-mail: kristin.johnsen@nist.gov
URL: http://www.mep.nist.gov/
New England Environmental
Network
Nothing To Waste Initiative (NTW). The NTW
Initiative is a pilot environmental justice and
pollution prevention program designed to
5-7
-------
provide and link necessary economic and
environmental resources to small businesses in
low income communities of color. NTW infuses
pollution prevention tools and continuous
improvement techniques into peer lending
groups of four to ten small business owners who
are participating in the business education and
loan program of Working Capital, a nonprofit
community development finance agency. With
initial funding from EPA, the NTW pilot has
functioned as a unique collaboration between
local community development corporations
(Grove Hall CDC in Roxbury, MA, and Green
Island CDC in Worcester, MA); Working
Capital, Cambridge Environmental, Inc.; and the
New England Environmental Network at Tufts
University.
Addr. Marcy Goldstein-Gelb,
Massachusetts Director, Working
Capital
New England Environmental Network
99 Bishop Allen Drive
Cambridge, MA 02139
Tel: 617-576-8620
Fax: 617-576-8623
E-mail: wcapmgelb @ aol.com
Addr. Ronajulien
U.S. EPA Region 1
Tel: 617-565-9454
The Pacific Institute
The Pacific Institute for Studies in Development,
Environment and Security is an independent,
non-profit center conducting research and policy
analysis in the areas of environment, sustainable
development, and international security. The
Institute focuses on the interrelatedness of many
of the problems facing our planet and seeks
comprehensive solutions to these problems.
Addr: Peter Gleick, President
Pacific Institute
1204 Preservation Park Way
Oakland, CA 94612
E-mail: pistaff@pacinst.org
The Rainforest Alliance
The Smart Wood Program. Initiated in 1989,
the program Initially focused on tropical forests.
Today, Smart Wood works in all forest types
worldwide. The purpose of Smart Wood is to
provide independent, objective evaluation of
forest management practices, forest products,
timber sources, and companies, enabling the
public to identify products and practices that do
not destroy forests. Through certification and use
of the Smart Wood label the program provides a
commercial incentive for forest managers to
adopt sustainable forestry practices. Smart Wood
certifies forest products that come from
Asustainable® or Awell managed© forests
(Asources@); Smart Wood also certifies
companies that process, manufacture, or sell
products made from certified wood, through
Achain of custody® certification.
Addr: Richard Donovan, Director
65 .Bleecker Street
New York, NY 10012-2420
Tel: 212-677-1900
Fax: 212-677-2187
E-mail: smartwood@ra.org
URL: httpy/www.rainforest-alliance.org
The Sierra Club
The Sierra Club is tracking the application of
ISO 14000 to ensure that it is applied in a
manner that will result in increased
environmental protection and it reflects accurate
information about how ISO 14000-rated firms
are promoting a high standard of environmental
performance.
Addr: Dan Seligman, Trade and
Environment Director
Sierra Club
408 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20016
Tel: 202-675-2387
5-8
-------
Fax: 202-547-6009
E-mail: dan.seligman@sierraclub.org
URL: http://www.sierraclub.org
Addr. Jerry Speir, Director
Tulane Institute for Environmental
Law and Policy
Tulane Law School
New Orleans, LA 70118-5670
Tel: 504-862-8829
Fax: 504-862-8857
E-mail: jspeir@law.tulane.edu
Addr. John Audley
2247 Laeb
Political Science Department
Purdue University
West Lafayette, IN 47907
Tel: 317-494-7599
E-mail: audley@polsci.purdue.edu
ACADEMIC
Brown University
Brown Is Green (BIG) Program. BIG is an
environmental education and advocacy program
established to involve undergraduates in the
research and analysis of environmental problems
related to university operations and provide a
model for active learning that can be replicated
nationally. The students involved in this
program develop skills in incorporating
environmentally benign technology and methods
into daily operations. They also devise and test
methods for educating individuals within an
organization on the environmental effects of
their behavior.
Addr: Kurt Teichert, Environmental
Coordinator
Brown University
Box 1943
Providence, RI02912-1943
Tel: 401-863-7837
Fax: 401-863-3503
E-mail: kurt_teichert@brown.edu
URL: httpy/www.brown.edu/departments/
brown_is_green
Georgia Institute of
Technology, Economic
Development Institute (EDI)
EDI provides ISO 14000 information, training,
and implementation assistance through EDI*s
Center for International Standards and Quality
(CISQ). Companies can enroll hi a customized
implementation program that will help them
successfully prepare for ISO 14000 registration,
participate in the ISO 14000 discussion group (a
forum of business representatives who meet
periodically to share information and
experiences related to ISO 14000), and access
current ISO 14000 ^formation through CISQ's
Standards Information Service.
Addr: Donna M. Ennis
Georgia Tech/CISQ/EDI
151 6th Street, Room 143
Atlanta, GA 30332-0640
Tel: 404-894-0968
Fax: 404-894-1192
E-mail: cisq.mail@edi.gatech.edu
URL: http://www.edi.gatech.edu
Montana State University
Extension Service
Montana Pollution Prevention Program. This
program provides pollution prevention technical
assistance to small businesses (automotive,
wood working, printers, hotels/motels,
construction, dry- cleaning), schools, Native
American tribes, local government, and
agricultural operations.
Addr: Dr. Michael P. Vogel
5-9
-------
Montana State University Extension
Service
109 Taylor Hall
Bozeman, MT 59717
Tel: 406-994-3451
Fax: 406-994-5417
E-mail: acxmu@trex.oscs.montana.edu
URL: http://www.montana.edu/wated
University of Maryland
Environmental Finance Center (EFC). Part of
the Coastal and Environmental Policy Program
at the University of Maryland, EFC was created
to train, provide assistance, and act in an
advisory capacity to state and local governments
on issues related to environmental finance.
Among other activities, EFC advises local
officials in forums for frank discussions between
local officials and finance experts about
financing difficulties experienced by
communities in meeting their environmental
demands.
Addr. Elizabeth Hickey
EFC
University of Maryland
Coastal and Environmental Policy
Program
0112 Skinner Hall
College Park, MD 20742
Tel: 301-405-6383
Fax: 301-314-9581
E-mail: hickey@umbi.umd.edu
URL: http://www.mdsg.umd.edu:80/mdsg/
envifin/indexJitml
Salt Lake Community College
Tlte Environmental Training Center. The
Environmental Training Center provides
noncredit workshops hi environmental health
and safety subjects. This includes 1- and 2-day
workshops on the ISO 14000 standard.
Addr. Neal K. Ostler, Center Coordinator
Millcreek Center
1521 East 3900 South
Salt Lake City, UT 84124
Tel: 801-957^942
Fax: 801-957-3848
E-mail: ostlerne@slcc.edu
URL: httpy/www.slcc.edu/cce/hazwop.htrn
SUNY Buffalo
The Science and Engineering Library at SUNY
Buffalo, in conjunction with other university
libraries, is compiling a list of print and
electronic resources related to the topic of
Environment and Business, including resources
for ISO 14000, Clean Products and Design, and
Life Cycle Assessment. The resources are
maintained on the Science and Engineering
Library Web site under Internet Resources by
Subject: Environment. Other fee-based
information services are also available from the
Science and Engineering Library upon inquiry.
Addr: Frederick W. Stoss, M.S., M.L.S.,
Associate Librarian
Science and Engineering Library
Capen Hall, Room 228-B
SUNY Buffalo
Buffalo, NY 14260-2200
Tel: 716- 645-2946 ext. 224
Fax: 716-645-3710
E-mail: fstoss@acsu.buffalo.edu
URL: http://wings.buffalo.edu/
libraries/units/sel/
Tulane Institute for
Environmental Law and Policy
ISO 14000 From a Public Interest Perspective.
This initiative attempts to assess and respond to
developments in ISO 14000 implementation
from a nongovernmental and nonindustry
perspective.
Addr: Jerry Speir, Director
Tulane Institute for Environmental
Law and Policy
Tulane Law School
5-10
-------
New Orleans, LA 70118-5670
Tel: 504-862-8829
Fax: 504-862-8857
E-mail: jspeir@law.tulane.edu
University of Wisconsin-Stout
Economic Development Administration
University Center (EDA-UC). The University of
Wisconsin-Stout's EDA-UC provides service and
assistance in management system education,
training, and outreach to regional businesses and
industry on the implementation and operation of
systems based on international standards.
Addr. Dr. Wallace Carlson, Professor
Industrial Management
University of Wisconsin-Stout
Menomonie, WI54751
Tel: 715-232-5162
Fax: 715-232-1105
E-mail: carlsonw@uwstout.edu
Addr. Nancy Jennejohn,
EDA-UC Program Manager
University of Wisconsin-Stout
Menomonie, WI 54751
Tel: 715-232-5023
Fax: 715-232-1985
E-mail: jennejohn@uwstout.edu
Vanderbilt Center for
Environmental Management
Studies (VCEMS)
VCEMS was formed to promote and develop
partnerships between industry, government, and
academia to explore new environmental
management practices and opportunities.
VCEMS' most recent initiatives include
incorporation of ISO 14000 principles into the
established environmental management
framework and to remove the Agreen wall@
barriers to sound environmental management
programs.
Addr. Paige Macdonald, Program Director
VCEMS, Vanderbilt University
1207 18th Avenue South
Nashville, TN 37212
Tel: 615-322-8004
Fax: 615-343-7408
E-mail: macdonald @uansv5. vanderbilt edu
URL: http://www.vanderbilt.edu/vcems
5-11
-------
-------
6
INTERNATIONAL
INITIATIVES
The international listings in this chapter include multilateral organizations with initiatives that
extend across national boundaries and a sampling of national initiatives based in other countries
that may be useful both as information resources as well as models for programs in the United
States.
1. Multilateral Organizations
2. Alphabetical Listings by Country
-------
-------
M U LTI LATERAL
ORGANIZATIONS
Environmental Management
Secretariat for Latin America
and the Caribbean (LAC)
The purpose of the Environmental Management
Secretariat in the LAC region is to facilitate the
improvement of environmental management
through the application of three interrelated
instruments: research, horizontal cooperation,
and information systems (largely Internet based)
to support decisions by those engaged in policy
formulation and implementation and in activities
based on services or raw materials derived from
renewable resources.
The secretariat is also developing a focused
research program through competitive small
research grants to address the key environmental
management issues of the region.
A ddr: Alexis Ferrand
Environmental Management
Secretariat
c/o CHD/IDRC
Casilla de Correo 6379
Montevideo, Uruguay
Tel: +598-2-922031/4 - 922037/44
Fax: +598-2-920223
E-mail: aferrand@idrc.ca
URL: http://www.chasque.apc.org/sema
Commission for
Environmental Cooperation
(CEC)
CEC was created to address regional
environmental concerns, help prevent potential
trade and environmental conflicts, and promote
the effective enforcement of environmental laws.
Current related activities of the CEC include a
study of North American experiences with
voluntary compliance, including ISO 14000 and
an examination of the interface between ISO
14000 and enforcement and compliance policies
and programs.
Addr: Linda F. Duncan, Head
Law & Enforcement Cooperation
Program
CEC
393 Rue St Jacques Bureau 200
Montreal, Quebec, H2Y 1N9
Tel: 514-350-4334
Fax: 514-350-4314
E-mail: lduncan@ccemti.org
URL: http://www.cec.org
Organisation for Economic
Cooperation and Development
(OECD)
Sustainable Product Policies and Life Cycle
Management. The objective of the project is to
monitor initiatives and policies that favor the
diffusion of life cycle approaches among
economic factors. This entails following the
work that ISO and other organizations are
carrying out, and examining implications for the
transfer of information in the marketplace (e.g.,
through ecolabelling initiatives and life cycle
assessments), product performance standards,
public purchasing of environmentally preferable
goods and services, and extended producer
responsibility.
Addr: Carlo Pesso
OECD
2 Rue Andre Pascal
75775 Paris
France
Tel: +33-1-45-24-16-82
Fax: +33-1-45-24-78-76
E-mail: Carlo.PESSO@oecd.org
URL: httpy/www.oecd.org/env/divppc.htm
6-1
-------
United Nations Conference on
Trade and Development
(UNCTAD)
Training Program for Officials Interested in
ISO in Developing Countries. Many businesses
operating in or trading with developing countries
are not fully aware of the developments in ISO
14000. A training guide is being developed by a
United Nations (UN) agency in Geneva,
Switzerland (the UN Conference on Trade and
Development), to provide information.
Benchmark Environmental Consulting served as
the consultant for the research and writing.
Addr:
Fax:
Addr:
Dr. John Cuddy, Coordinator
Sustainable Development Program
UNCTAD
Rm.E9077
Palais des Nations
CH-1211 Geneva 10
Switzerland
+4122-907-0045
Dr. Harris Gleckman
Benchmark Environmental Consulting
470 Forest Ave, Suite 302
Portland, ME 04101
Tel: 207-775-9078
Fax: 207-772-3539
E-mail: benchmark@interramp.com
URL: www.greenchannel.com and
http://194.177.160.204:80/standards
/iso/14001/
United Nations Environmental
Program (UNEP)
UNEP Metadata Directory. The UNEP
Metadata Directory serves as a card catalogue of
environmental information. It contains card
entries (or metadata descriptions) of institutes
and datasets and allows users to search for
environmental information by institute name or
dataset (title), contact person (author), theme,
keyword, and location (subject), as well as other
criteria.
Addr: James McKenna, Program Officer
UNEP
P.O. Box 3052
Nairobi, Kenya
Tel: +254-2-623899
Fax: +254-2-624315
E-mail: mckennaj@unep.no
URL: http://www.grid.unep.no
United Nations Industrial
Development Organization
(UNI DO)
UNDDO is conducting several studies to make
recommendations for government policies and
strategies related to productivity, quality, and
environment in the Economic and Social
Commission for the LAC region. The studies pay
particular attention to the impact of ISO 14000
standards on industrial competitiveness and
policy recommendation.
Addr: Mr. Hessel Schuurman,
ECLAC/UNIDO
Associate Expert
P.O. Box 179-D
Santiago, Chile
Tel: +56 2-210-2417
Fax: +56 2-208-0252
E-mail: hschuurm@eclac.cl
US-AID
EMS Development for Industry - Electric
Power Sector. The Central Maine Power
Company and the Natsionalna Elektricheska
Kompania of Bulgaria are working on a U.S.
AID-funded effort to develop EMS for major
power plants in Bulgaria and for the central
electric utility system. Bulgaria has adopted
environmental standards similar to those of
western Europe and the United States, however,
both the plant equipment and the management
systems are dated in terms of being able to meet
these standards. This initiative will help the
management side of environmental businesses.
One major power plant was selected for system
development; at the discretion of the Natsionalna
6-2
-------
Elektricheska Kompania, the EMS techniques
will be transferred to the rest of the system.
Addr: Dr. Robert Ichord, Jr.
U.S. AID
320 21st Street NW
Washington, DC 20523
Tel: 202-647-6962
Fax: 202-647-8274
Addr: Hristo Shwabsky
. Natsionalna Elektricheska Kompania
Sofia, Bulgaria
Tel: 359-2 980-1968
Fax: 359-2-875826
E-mail: nek.s.msp@mcrl .poptel.org.uk
Addr: James H. Wazlaw
Central Maine Power International
One Grandview Place
Winthrop,ME 04364
Tel: 207-626-9749
Fax: 207-626-9597
(Cross-listed with State Initiatives, chapter 4)
The United States
Environmental Training
Institute (USETI)
USETI is working in conjunction with
Environmental Pollution Control and Sanitation
Technology Company of Sao Paulo State
(CETESB) coordinating a Green Procurement
Policy project and P2/ISO 14000 courses.
Addr: Joel Riciputi
USETI
100 Thomas Jefferson Street, NW
Suite 106
Washington, DC 20007
Tel: 202-338-3400
Fax: 202-333-4782
Addr: Julia Alves
Rua Murupi, 195
Sao Paulo, Capital 05467-040
Brazil
Tel: +55-1 l-3030-6491or +55-1-3030-6490
Fax: +55-11-3030-6401
E-mail: juliaa@cetesb.br
World Bank
Informal Working Group on ISO 14000. This
group is addressing the possible implications on
environment and trade for the countries. No
documents have yet been published.
Addr: David Hanrahan
Environment Department (Room S3069)
World Bank
1818 H Street NW
Washington, DC 20433
Tel: 202-458-5686
Fax: 202-477-0968
E-mail: dhanrahan@worldbank.org
COUNTRY
INITIATIVES
Austria
EU Environmental Management and Audit
Scheme (EMAS). The objective of the scheme is
to promote continual improvements in the
environmental performance of industrial
activities by 1) establishing and implementing
environmental policies, programs, and
management systems; 2) evaluating the
performance of such elements; and 3)
establishing public information vehicles.
Addr: Johannes Mayer, Director
Dept. Information-Documentation-
Library
Federal Environment Agency
Spittelauer Laende 5, A
6-3
-------
1090 Vienna, Austria
Tel: 443-1-31304-3240
Fax: 443-1-31304-5400
E-mail: mayer@uba.ubavie.gv.at
URL: http://www.ubavie.gv.at
Institute for Ecological Research in
Economics. The institute conducts research in
the field of environmental management,
ecobalances, environmental accounting,
pollution, and ecodesign.
Addr: Dr. Christine Jasch
Institut fur Okologische
Wirtschaftsforschung
Rechte WienzeUe 19/5, A-1043 Wien
Austria
Tel: +0043-1-587-21-89
Fax: 4-0043-1-587-09-71
E-mail: ioew@magnet.at
Bolivia
SnstainaSle Development Networking
Programme (SDNP). SDNP comprises a
network of institutions related to sustainable
development and environment issues through e-
mail connectivity and Internet facilities. The
institutions are from the government, private,
academic, and international cooperation sectors.
Addr: Juan Pablo Arce, National Coordinator
Sustainable Development and
Environment Ministry
RDS/UNDP
P.O. Box 12814
La Paz, Bolivia
Tel: +591-2-317320
Fax: 4-591-2-317320
E-mail: sdnp@coord.rds.org.bo
URL: http://coord.rds.org.bo
Canada
The HeaWi Sciences Centre (HSC). HSC is
currently implementing an ISO 14001 Pilot
Project in a 900 bed tertiary care teaching
hospital.
HSC is participating in the Canadian Standards
Association's (CSA) Pilot Project to implement
an EMS in conformance with the draft ISO
14000 series of environmental standards. HSC
already has several components of the system in
place: 1) an environmental policy and senior
management commitment to the policy, 2) an
initial environmental review of issues, and 3) a
performance reporting process.
During the next 12 months, the complete
specifications for all processes in the EMS will
be drafted in conformance with the ISO 14001
standard.
Addr: John Reimer, P.E.
Health Sciences Centre
Environmental Protection Department
Room MH 216
59 Pearl Street
Winnipeg, Manitoba
R3E3L7 Canada
Tel: 204-787-4792
Fax: 204-7874854
E-mail: j.reimer@awnet.com
URL: http*y/www/hsc.mb.ca (under
construction)
Canadian Departments of Environment and
Industries'National Environmental Training
Initiative. This initiative provides training
materials and other source documents on the
implementation of ISO 14000 voluntary
environmental management standards to small
and medium sized businesses.
Addr: Dennis Landry
13th Floor
35 ISt Joseph Blvd.
Hull, Quebec Kl A OH3
Tel: 819-994-7977
Fax: 819-953-7970
EMS Accreditation Program. The program is
governed by guidelines contained in Standards
Council of Canada (SCC) publications entitled
"Criteria and Procedures for Accreditation of
Organizations Registering Environmental
6-4
-------
Management Systems" (CAN-P-14), "Criteria
and Procedures for Accreditation of
Environmental Auditors Certification
Organizations" (CAN-P-1412), and, in the near
future, "Criteria and Procedures for the
Accreditation of Environmental Auditor
Training Courses and Providers" (CAN-P-1413).
The SCC is a federal crown corporation and a
nonprofit organization. All components of this
program operate on a full cost-recovery basis.
An advisory committee on EMS, made up of
experts in the field, oversees the accreditation
program and provides advice to SCC on matters
pertaining to the environment The SCC's
deputy director of standardization is currently
responsible for the day-to-day operation of the
program; the manager of conformity assessment
will assume this responsibility in the summer of
1997.
Registrars submit a written application to the
SCC for accreditation, describing their
organization and resources and including a fee
as outlined in a published fee schedule. The
environmental auditor certifiers submit a similar
application as will the environmental auditor
course providers.
Addr: Don Wilson, PJE.
45 O'Connor Street
Ottawa, ON KIP 6N7
Canada
Tel: 613-238-3222, ext 140
Fax: 613-995-4564
E-mail: dwilson@scc.ca
URL: http://www.scc.ca
Kyrgyzstan
Ecologist Club. The club manages independent
monitoring of Human Ecology in Kyrgyzstan and
neighboring regions.
Addr: Khodjamberdiev Igor, President
Ecologist Club
Khodjamberdiev, P.B.1451
Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, 720040
Tel: +3312-221041
Fax: +3312-288362
E-mail:
igorho @ nlpub .freenet.bishkek.su
Romania
Advanced Interactive Training Course on
EMS. This course applies the principles of the
British Standard 7750 (BS 7750) and the
European Eco Management and Audit Scheme
(EMAS) in Romania.
The course is delivered over 3 days with the
participants implementing the first 2 stages of an
EMS, gaining commitment and policy
formulation and performing the initial review
during the month following the course. After a
month, they participate in a 2-day workshop
where they present achievements, receive an
attendance diploma, and receive training hi
management for change.
Addr: Bogdan O. Paranici
Str. Academiei 27, et. 2, Apartment 5
70108, Sector 1
Bucharest, Romania
Tel: +40-1-312-66-39 or 615-02-32
Fax: +40-1-312-42-63
E-mail: oparanici@pcnet.pcnet.ro
Spain
Program of communication and interpretation
in protected natural areas. Make available
information and general services for visits to
natural areas, services of interpretation and
guided itineraries, formation and coordination of
a volunteer program, communication to the local
population and promotion of local participation
Addr: Mariano Soriano Urban, Ph. D
Institute de Ciencias Sociales y
Ambientales
Oral. Martin Carrera
Ed. Dunia H, B-A
6-5
-------
E-30011-Murcia
Spain
Tel: +34-908-36-19-37 or +34-968-26-97-91
Fax: +34-968-26-97-91
E-mail: murbaa@ctv.es
URL: http://ctv.es/USERS/murban
Sweden
Chalmers University of Technology, Managing
for Environmental Opportunities, Chalmers
University of Technology offers this program
through its executive education organization,
Chalmers Advanced Management programs
(CHAMPS).
The focus is business-oriented and covers issues
like scenario-based strategy development,
transformation of the enterprise to gain
environmental competitive advantage,
development and implementation of EMS such
as ISO 14000, and the EMAS. The program
brings together a faculty of internationally
renowned lecturers, NGOs, and industry cases
with a mixed group of participants. The program
is divided into two modules that is carried
through in Sweden and the Netherlands.
Addr: Peter Lindwall
CHAMPS
Chalmers Teknikpark
S-412 88 Gothenburg
Sweden
Tel: +46 31-772-43-22
Fax: +46 31-772-41-71
E-mail:
peter.lindwall@champs.chahners.se
URL: httpy/www.champs.chahners.se/
Switzerland
Quality Management Systems /Environmental
Management Systems (QMS / EMS). This
project introduces EMS in accordance with ISO
14001 to companies who already are hi
accordance with ISO 9000 to ensure the most
efficient changeover process. The project
commenced January 1,1995, and is working
closely with the primary certifier for EMS
accreditation for ISO standards in Switzerland.
Addr: Reto Felix
University of St. Gall
Institute for Management of Technology
(TTEM-HSG)
Unterstrasse 22
CH-9000 St. Gall
Switzerland
Tel: +41-71-228-24-14
Fax: +41-71-228-24-20
E-mail: reto.felix@item.unisg.ch
URL: http://www.unisg.ch/~item/
PROJECT/QM/ qmsems.html
United Kingdom
Centre for Environmental Technology. The
Centre is currently running three EMS oriented
projects hi the United Kingdom (UK) and the
European Union (EU): 1) a pilot project to
investigate the application of a standard
methodology to implement the EU Eco-
management and audit scheme (EMAS) in
selected SMEs across the EU; 2) a UK study into
environmental threats and opportunities facing
SMEs and their associated management
strategies, and 3) a pilot study investigating the
barriers and opportunities facing enterprises
implementing EMAS and other EMS such as the
British standard BS 7750 and ISO 14001.
Addr: Ruth Hillary
Centre for Environmental Technology
Imperial College of Science,
Technology, and Medicine
48 Prince's Gardens
London SW7 2PE England
Tel: +44-171-589-5111
Fax: +44-171-581-0245
E-mail: r.hillary@ic.ac.uk
6-6
-------
This chapter presents listings of ISO 14000-related resources rather than initiatives. These
resources may be useful sources of information to organizations exploring ISO 14000, and several
categories of resources are included. Each entry only briefly describes the resource; contact
information is provided for use in obtaining more details.
The entries included in this section are not endorsed or approved in any way by EPA. All
submitted entries that were applicable for inclusion in the Directory have been listed. Because the
purpose of this Directory is to provide information on government activities concerning ISO
14000 and/or Environmental Mnagement Systems (EMS), it is beyond the scope of the Directory
to include a comprehensive listing of all the private sector organizations and initiatives also
involved in ISO 14000 and/or EMS. Every effort has been made to ensure the information in each
entry is correct.
1. U.S. national Standards
2. International Standards
3. Accreditation
4. Training
5. Clearinghouses
6. Publications
7. Internet Resources
-------
-------
U.S. NATIONAL STANDARDS
The American National Standards Institute (ANSI)
ANSI is the single, private sector certifier of U.S. national standards, and is the sole U.S. member body to
the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ANSI does not develop standards, rather ANSI
is responsible for providing U.S. input, through Technical Advisory Groups (TAGs), to international
standards development committees in ISO. Contact: Jane Schweiker, Director Public Policy and
Government Relations, ANSI, 7315 Wisconsin Ave., Suite 250-E Bethesda, MD 20814. Tel:
301^69-3363. E-mail: jschweik@ansi.org.
Three U.S. standards organizations, which are members of ANSI, cooperate in the administration of the
U.S. TAG for ISO 14000 standards. They are:
American Society for Testing & Materials Initiatives (ASTM)
ASTM is the primary administrator for the entire U.S. TAG to ISO TC207. Kathy Morgan, ASTM, 100
Bar Harbor Dr., West Conshohocken, PA 19428. Tel: 610-832-9721. Fax: 610-832-9666. E-mail:
kmorgan@local.astm.org. URL: http://www.asrm.org.
American Society for Quality Control (ASQC)
611 East Wisconsin Ave., P.O. Box 3005, Milwaukee, WI53201. Tel: 800-248-1946. Fax:
414-272-1734.
NSF International
NSF International is an authorized source for the ISO 14000 standards. Anita M. Cooney, NSF
International, 2100 Commonwealth Blvd., Ann Arbor MI 48105. Tel: 313-332-7333. Fax: 313-669-0196.
Information on these and other U.S. standards-setting bodies is provided through NIST (see page 3-1) or
ANSI.
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS
Both the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)
recognize the national standards-setting bodies that are members of ISO. Information on TC207 Member
Bodies and the countries they represent is available via the ISO home page: www.iso.org.
ACCREDITATION
ANSI-Registrar Accreditation Board (RAB)
National Accreditation Program (NAP) for ISO 14000 Environmental Management Standards.
ANSI-RAB conducts the U.S. national accreditation program that accredits registrars and training course
7-1
-------
providers. Rick James, ANSI-RAB, 7315 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 250-E, Bethesda, MD 20814. Tel:
301-469-3360. Fax: 301-469-3361.
TRAINING
ISO 14000 training courses are offered by a wide variety of organizations and companies within the
private sector. Various federal and state agencies, universities, and other organizations may also offer
in-house training courses. Information about these courses may be obtained by contacting them directly.
Training course information within EPA may be obtained by contacting Eric Wilkinson, Voluntary
Standards Network, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (7409), 401 M St., SW, Washington, DC
20460. Tel: 202-260-3575. Fax: 202-260-0178. E-mail: willdnson.eric@epamaU.epa.gov.
EPA's Pollution Prevention Information Clearinghouse (PPIC)
PPIC disseminates information on the U.S. EPA's involvement with ISO 14000 via the Internet and EPA
and Pollution Prevention Division home pages. Susan Westerburg, US. EPA,. 401 M St., SW (MC
7407), Washington, DC 20460. Tel: 202-260-1758. Fax:202-260-4659. E-mail:
ppic@epamail.epa.gov.
World Data Center A (WDC-A) for Human Interactions in the
Environment
Data resources available include collections of international environmental agreements, integrated
assessment models of global climatic change, as well as the distributed international resources of
CIESIN's Information Cooperative. Dr. Roberta Balstad Miller, Director, CIESIN, 2250 Pierce Road,
University Center, MI 48710-0001. Tel: 517-797-2727. Fax: 517-797-2622. E-mail: ciesin.info@
ciesin.org URL: http://www.ciesin.org
PUBLICATIONS
The ISO 14000 series of standards are copyrighted and can be obtained by contacting any of the following
organizations: ANSI, 7315 Wisconsin Ave., Suite 250-E Bethesda, MD 20814. Tel: 301-469-3363.
ASTM, 100 Bar Harbor Dr.,West Conshohocken, PA 19428. Tel: 610-832-9721. Fax: 610-832-9666.
ASQC, 611 East Wisconsin Ave., P.O. Box 3005, Milwaukee, WI53201. Tel: 800-248-1946. Fax:
414-272-1734. NSF International, 2100 Commonwealth Blvd., Ann Arbor MI 48105. Tel:
313-332-7333. Fax:313-669-0196.
INTERNET RESOURCES
Mailing Lists
#ecdm
7-2
-------
The Environmentally Conscious Design and Manufacturing mailing list is as a forum for discussing issues
regarding designs and manufacturing processes for products (including buildings) from an
environmentally friendly viewpoint. Methods for analyzing these products are also discussed. Post
messages to ecdm@pdomam.uwindsor.ca. The listserver address is: listserv@pdomain.uwindsor.ca.
URL: http://ie.uwindsor.ca/ecdmlist/welcome.html.
#govpub
This list promotes the dissemination of local and state government information online to exchange ideas
and information related to their efforts. Both the technical and policy issues of government information
on the Internet are addressed. Post messages to: govpub@listserv.nodak.edu. The listserver address is:
listserv@listserv.nodak.edu.
#iso!4000
This unmoderated list is designed for the discussion of the ISO 14000 certification guidelines for
environmental and related industries. Post messages to isol4000@quality.org. Listserver at
majordomo @ quality.org.
#quest
The QUEST list (Quality, Environment, Safety in Management).
Post messages to quest@listserv.nodak.edu. Listserver at listserv@listserv.nodak.edu.
#regref-l
This list (Regulatory Reform List) is a moderated discussion group that is intended to foster an
interdisciplinary discussion about the reform of regulation. No one accepted definition of regulation
exists for the purposes of this discussion group, the term "regulation" is used broadly to include the full
range of legal instruments by which governing institutions, at all levels of government, impose obligations
or constraints on private sector behavior. Post messages to regref-l@cyberus.ca. Listserver at
majordomo@cyberus.ca. URL: http://www.cyberus.ca.
#tenep
The Electronic Network of Environmental Professionals (TENEP) moderated list. Post messages to
tenep @ envision.net.
ISO Websites
International Organization for Standardization
Official ISO Online site. ISO information including Your guide to ISO Online, Introduction to ISO, ISO
structure, ISO members worldwide, ISO technical committees, ISO meeting calendar, ISO Catalogue;
What's new at ISO?, and Other Web servers providing standards information. For specific questions and
comments on this WWW server: webmaster@isocs.iso.ch. For general information and questions on ISO:
CENTRAL SECRETARIAT ADDRESS 1, rue de Varembe, Case postale 56, CH-1211 Geneve 20,
Switzerland. Tel: +412274901 11. Fax: + 41227333430- E-mail: central@isocs.iso.ch. URL:
http://www.iso.ch.
International Organization for Standardization
7-3
-------
Additional WWW server for the ISO (as of 4/30/97, faster access than official site). ISO information
including: How to place your order for ISO Standard Publications published by ISO in Geneva, What is
ISO?, Technical Committees, Newly Published ISO and EC Standards, and ISO and EC Draft
International Standards (DIS). H. Ikeda, Computer Engineering, Electronic Systems Division, Department
of Electric and Electronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chiba University, 1-33 Yayoi, Inage,
Chiba 263, Japan. Tel: +8143 290 3352. Fax: 81 43 290 3039. E-mail: ikeda@hike.te.chiba-u.ac.jp.
URL: http://133.82.181.177/ikeda/ISO/home.html.
International Organization for Standardization: Environmental Management
ISO site dealing with Environmental Management. Information on each of the subcommittees can be
found here as well. URL: http://www.iso.ch/meme/TC207.html.
U.S. Federal & State Government Websites
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) ISO 14000 information site
This site includes ISO 14000 and the Next Generation of Environmental Protection Tools, DEP Looking
for ISO 14000 Partners, Privatization of Environmental Regulation, So What is ISO 14000 Anyway?,
Going Green With Less Red Tape, ISO 14000: A Building Block for Redefining Environmental,
Sustainable Development, and Links to Others Sites With ISO 14000 Information.
E-mail: ASKDEP@al.dep.state.pa.us.
URL:http://www.dep^tate.pa.us/dep/deputate/pollprev/ISO14000/ISO14000JaTM.
President's Council on Sustainable Development site
This site includes a message from the Executive Director, General Information, Council Report, Vice
President's Speech, Task Force Reports, and Newsletters. E-mail: pcsd@igc.apc.org. URL:
http://www.whitehoiise.gOv/WH/EOP/pcsd/inde:thtml
Enviro$en$e
Enviro$en$eis a pollution prevention and environmental compliance assistance network. Its databases
offer full-text and multisite search tools to address technical and regulatory issues with information from a
wide spectrum of government, industry, academic, and public interest sources. URL: http://es.inel.gov/.
EPA's Partners for the Environment
EPA's Partners for the Environment Web site contains links to many other initiatives including 33/50,
Common Sense Initiative (CSI), Design for the Environment, Environmental Leadership Program, EPA
Standards Network, and Project XL. E-mail: anderson.joe@epamail.epa.gov. URL:
http://www.epa.gov/partners/.
The Public Sector Continuous Improvement Site
This site offers suggested reading material, a library of documents available online, organizations of
interest, and a guide to online resources. John Hunter, Webmaster, Public Sector Continuous
Improvement Site. E-mail: asqcpsn@aol.com. URL: http://deming.eng.clemson.edu/pub/psci.
International Websites
Canadian Standards Association
This site includes: Background Standards Information, News and Information, and Member and
Technical Committee Services. Canadian Standards Association, 178 Rexdale Boulevard, Etobicoke
7-4
-------
(Toronto), Ontario, M9W 1R3. Tel: 800-463-6726,416-747 4000. Fax: 416-747-4149. E-mail:
webmaster@csa.ca. URL: http://www.csa.ca/toc-prog.htm.
Central European Environmental Data Request Facility (CEDAR)
This is a project of the Austrian Federal Ministry for the Environment providing information including
CEDAR/1SEP, Databases and Resources, CEDAR Mailing List Archives (INFOTERRA, ENVENG-L),
Environmentally Relevant mstirations, other interesting links, and CEDAR/ISEP staff. E-mail:
webmaster@cedar.univie.ac.at. URL: http://www.cedar.unme.ac.at/.
United Nations Environment Programme Geneva Executive Center (Switzerland)
This Web site is maintained by UNEP's Information Unit for Conventions (IUC) to make information
from secretariats more widely available. Many environmental resources including: Trade and the
Environment and other Web sites on environment and sustainable development. E-mail:
Webmaster@unep.ch. URL: http://www.unep.ch.
La Planete a Besoin de Nous
French and European Environmental Associations Directory. Tel: 33-01-42-63-34-62. E-mail:
adme@worldnet.fr. URL: http://www.worldnet.fr/-adme.
Manitoba Pollution Prevention
This home page has link to the Canadian Council of Ministers of Environment, which in turn links to all
provincial environment department home pages. URL: http://www.gov.mb.ca/environ.
Standards Council of Canada
This site includes an article on pressures to create sector specific standards for ISO 14000.
Http://www.scc.ca/consensu/fitall2307.html
Industry Websites
IAS Environmental Management Systems (EMS) Registration Program and ISO 14000 Page
International Approval Services (IAS) is a joint venture of the American Gas Association and the
Canadian Gas Association EMS Registration Program and ISO 14000 Page that includes: ISO 14000
Introduction; Who - What - Where - When - Why - How of the ISO and ISO 14000; The U.S. Technical
Advisory Group (TAG) and Its Role in ISO; What Is An EMS?; ISO 14001 Guidance Document; Benefits
of EMS Implementation and Registration; and EMS Assessment Pilot Project. Cleveland Office (Main),
8501 E. Pleasant Valley Road, Cleveland, Ohio 44131. Tel: 800-247-0802 / 216-524-4990. Fax:
216-642-3463. URL: http://www.gasweb.org/gasweb/ias/isol4000.htm
Nongovernmental Organization Websites
The Committee for the National Institute for the Environment (CNIE)
CNIE is a national, nonprofit organization working to improve the scientific basis for making decisions on
environmental issues through creation of a new, non-regulatory environmental science and education
agency. E-mail: cnie@access.digex.net. URL: http://www.inhs.uiuc.edu/niewww/temp.html
ISO 14000 West Coast Working Group
7-5
-------
This site has the work of several committees from the West Coast of North America as well as general ISO
14000 information. URL: http://www.wcwg.org.
University Websites
Asian Institute of Technology (AIT). This site details how to implement ISO 14000.
URL:http://www.ait.ac.th/AIT/som/as/ISO14000)rmdex.htm.
Links
EcoNet World-Wide Web pages
This site contains links to the many environmental organizations. Information categories include EcoNet
News Of Note; EcoNet New and Featured Items; EcoNet Issue Resource Center (Web sites sorted by
category); EcoNet's Directory of Organizations; EcoNet's Environment Gopher; and a search engine for
EcoNet's Web site. There is no direct ISO 14000 information. E-mail: econet@igc.apc.org. URL:
http://www.igc.apc.org/econet.
GLOBE Resource Centre (GRC)
This site has links to Internet environmental business sites. E-mail: grcinfo@globe.apfnet.org. URL:
http://globel.apfnet.org/.
Quality Resources Online
This site provides a list of links to other Web resources (sites and mail lists) related to ISO 14000. E-mail:
help@quality.org. URL: http://www.casti.com/qc/html/isol4000.html.
ISO World
This site provides links to quality and EMS sites, and is the source of free Global Strategic Systems
Newsletters. E-mail: db700378@jnet.sumiden.co.jp. URL: http://www.omninet.
co.jp/isoworld/english/english.htm.
Centre for Economic and Social Studies for the Environment (CESSE)
Information includes activities; studies achieved and/or in progress; selected papers; training programs in
the field of environment; and a Directory of Best Environmental Directories. University Libre de
Bruxelles (ULB) 44, Avenue Jeanne, CP 124, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium. Tel: +32-2-650 33 77. Fax:
+32-2-65046.91. E-mail: whecq@ulb.ac.be. URL: http://www.ulb.ac.be/ceese/cesse.html.
WWW Virtual Library Environment
This site has links organized by subject and includes a List O' Lists of Environmental Resources. URL:
http://ecosys.drdr.virginia.edii/environment.html.
7-6
-------
MONITORING PERFORMANCE
APPENDIX
-------
Monitoring Perfomance—Appendices
Appendix I: Major ASTM Guides and Practices Related to Waste
and Site Characterization and Sampling
The following is a topical list of more than 80 American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)
guides and practices that may be of use when developing a ground-water or vadose zone monitor-
ing system for an industrial nonhazardous waste management facility. The volume in ASTM's
Annual Book of Standards is indicated at the end of each standard title. Volumes and individual
standards can be obtained from ASTM Customer Service, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West
Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959; 610/832-9585, fax 610/832-9555, website http://www.astm.org.
A.1 Waste Characterization and Sampling
A.1.1 General Guidance
D4687-95 Guide for General Planning of Waste Sampling (Vol. 11.04).
D5956-96 Guide for Sampling Strategies for Heterogeneous Wastes (Vol. 11.04).
D6009-96 Guide for Sampling Waste Piles (Vol. 11.04).
D6044-96 Guide for Representative Sampling and Management of Waste and Contaminated
Media (vol. 11.04).
D6051-96 Guide for Composite Sampling and Field Subsampling For Environmental Waste
Management Activities (Vol. 11.04).
D6063-96 Guide for Sampling of Drums and Similar Containers By Field Personnel
(Vol. 11.04).
A.1.2 Specific Sampling Procedures
D4489-95 Practices for Sampling Waterbome Oils (Vol. 11,02).
D4547-91 Practice for Sampling Waste and Soils for Volatile Organics (Vol. 11.04).
D4823-95 Guide for Core-Sampling Submerged, Unconsolidated Sediments (Vol. 11.02).
D5013-89 Practice for Sampling Wastes from Pipes and Other Point Discharges (Vol. 11.04).
D5358-93 Practice for Sampling with a Dipper or Pond Sampler (Vol. 11.04).
D5451-93 Practice for Sampling Using a Trier Sampler (Vol. 11.04).
D5495-94 Practice for Sampling with a Composite Liquid Waste Sampler (COLIWASA)
(Vol. 11.04).
D5633-94 Practice for Sampling with a Scoop (Vol. 11.04).
D5658-95 Practice for Sampling Unconsolidated Waste from Trucks (Vol. 11.04).
D5679-95a Practice for Sampling Consolidated Solids in Drums or Similar Containers
(Vol. 11.04).
D5680-95a Practice for Sampling Unconsolidated Solids in Drums or Similar Containers
(Vol. 11.04).
D5743-95 Practice for Sampling Single or Multilayered Liquids, With or Without Solids in
Drums or Similar Containers (Vol. 11.04)
A9-2
-------
Monitoring Perfomance—Appendices
Appendix I: Major ASTM Guides and Practices Related to Waste
and Site Characterization and Sampling (cont.)
A.2 Environmental Site Characterization
A.2.1 General Guidance
D5730-96 Guide to Site Characterization for Environmental Purposes With Emphasis on
Soil, Rock, The Vadose Zone and Ground Water (Vol. 4.09).
D5995-96 Guide for Environmental Site Characterization in Cold Regions (Vol. 4.09).
D420-93 Guide for Site Characterization for Engineering, Design, and Construction
Purposes (Vol. 4.08).
E1689-95 Guide for Developing Conceptual Site Models for Contaminated Sites
(Vol. 11.05).
PS3-95 Guide for Accelerated Site Characterization for Confirmed or Suspected
Petroleum Releases (Vol. 11.04).
PS85-96 Guide for Expedited Site Characterization of Hazardous Waste Contaminated
Sites (Vol. 4.09).
A.2.2 Aerial Photography and Imagery
D5518-94 Guide for Acquisition of File Aerial Photography and Imagery for Establishing
Historic Site-Use and Surficial Conditions (Vol 4.09).
A.2.3 Data Elements
D5911-95 Practice for a Minimum Set of Data Elements to Describe a Soil Sampling Site
(Vol. 4.09).
D5474-93 Guide for Selection of Data Elements for Ground-Water Investigations (Vol. 4.09).
D5254-92 Practice for the Minimum Set of Data Elements to Identify a Ground Water Site
(Vol. 4.09).
D5408-93 Guide for the Set of Data Elements to Describe a Ground-Water Site, Part 1—
Additional Identification Descriptors (Vol. 4.09).
D5409-93 Guide for the Set of Data Elements to Describe a Ground-Water Site, Part 2—
Physical Descriptors (Vol. 4.09).
D5410-93 Guide for the Set of Data Elements to Describe a Ground-Water Site, Part 3~
Usage Descriptors (Vol. 4.09).
**•.«
A.2.4 Geologic and Hydrogeologic Characterization
D5979-96 Guide for Conceptualization and Characterization of Ground Water Flow
Systems (Vol. 4.09).
D6030-96 Guide to Selection of Methods for Assessing Ground Water or Aquifer
Sensitivity and Vulnerability (Vol. 4.09).
A9-3
-------
Monitoring Perfomancc-^Appendices
Appendix I: Major ASTM Guides and Practices Related to Waste
and Site Characterization and Sampling (cont.)
D5717-95 Guide for the Design of Ground-Water Monitoring Systems in Karst and
Fractured-Rock Aquifers (Vol. 4.09).
D5980-96 Guide for Selection and Documentation of Existing Wells for Use in
Environmental Site Characterization and Monitoring (Vol. 4.09).
D6067-96 Guide for Using the Electronic Cone Pentrometer for Environmental Site
Characterization (Vol. 4.09).
D5434-93 Guide for Field Logging of Subsurface Explorations of Soil and Rock (Vol. 4.09).
D4043-91 Guide for Selection of Aquifer-Test Field and Analytical Procedures in
Determination of Hydraulic Properties by Well Techniques (Vol. 4.08).
D5126-90 Guide for Comparison of Field Methods for Determining Hydraulic
Conductivity in the Vadose Zone (Vol. 4.09).
D6000-96 Guide for the Presentation of Water-Level Information From Ground Water
Sites (Vol. 4.09).
A.2.5 Geophysical Methods
D5753-95 Guide for Planning and Conducting Borehole Geophysical Logging (Vol. 4.09).
D5777-95 Guide for Using the Seismic Refraction Method for Subsurface Investigations
(Vol. 4.09).
A.2.6 Drilling Methods
D5781-95 Guide for Use of Dual-Wall Reverse-Circulation Drilling for Geoenvironmental
Exploration and Installation of Subsurface Water-Quality Monitoring Devices
(Vol. 4.09).
D5782-95 Guide for Use of Direct Air-Rotary Drilling for Geoenvironmental Exploration
and Installation of Subsurface Water-Quality Monitoring Devices (Vol. 4.09).
D5783-95 Guide for Use of Direct Rotary Drilling with Water-Based Drilling Fluid for
Geoenvironmental Exploration and Installation of Subsurface Water-Quality
Monitoring Devices (Vol. 4.09).
D5784-95 Guide for Use of Hollow-Stem Augers for Geoenvironmental Exploration and
Installation of Subsurface Water-Quality Monitoring Devices (Vol. 4.09).
D5872-95 Guide for Use of Casing Advancement Drilling Methods for Geoenvironmental
Exploration and Installation of Subsurface Water-Quality Monitoring Devices
(Vol. 4.09).
D5875-95 Guide for Use of Cable-Tool Drilling and Sampling Methods for
Geoenvironmental Exploration and Installation of Subsurface Water-Quality
Monitoring Devices (Vol. 4.09).
D5876-95 Guide for Use of Direct Rotary Wireline Casing Advancement Drilling Methods
for Geoenvironmental Exploration and Installation of Subsurface Water-Quality
Monitoring Devices (Vol. 4.09).
A9-4
-------
Monitoring Perfomance—Appendices
Appendix I: Major ASTM Guides and Practices Related to Waste—]
and Site Characterization and Sampling (cont.)
A.3 Ground Water Monitoring Wells (see also drilling methods in
A.2.6 above)
D5092-90 Practice for Design and Installation of Ground Water Monitoring Wells in
Aquifers (Vol. 4.09).
D5787-95 Practice for Monitoring Well Protection (Vol. 4.09).
D5521-94 Guide for Development of Ground-Water Monitoring Wells in Granular
Aquifers (Vol. 4.09).
D4750-87 Test Method for Determining Subsurface Liquid Levels in a Borehole or
Monitoring Well (Observation Well) (Vol. 4.09).
D5978-96 Guide for Maintenance and Rehabilitation of Ground Water Monitoring Wells
(Vol. 4.09).
D5299-92 Guide for the Decommissioning of Ground Water Wells, Vadose Zone
Monitoring Devices, Boreholes and Other Devices for Environmental Activities
(Vol. 4.09).
A.4 Ground Water Sampling
D5903-95 Guide for Planning and Preparing for a Ground-Water Sampling Event (Vol. 4.09).
D4448-85a Guide for Sampling Groundwater Monitoring Wells (Vol. 11.04).
D6001-96 Guide for Direct-push Water Sampling for Geoenvironmental Investigations
(Vol. 4.09).
A.5 Vadose Zone Monitoring
D4700-91 Guide for Soil Sampling from the Vadose Zone (Vol. 4.08).
D3404-91 Guide to Measuring Matric Potential in the Vadose Zone Using Tensiometers
(Vol. 4.08).
D4696-92 Guide for Pore-Liquid Sampling From the Vadose Zone (Vol. 4.08).
D5314-92 Guide for Soil Gas Monitoring in the Vadose Zone (Vol. 4.09).
D5299-92 Guide for the Decommissioning of Ground Water Wells, Vadose Zone
Monitoring Devices, Boreholes and Other Devices for Environmental Activities
(Vol. 4.09).
A.6 Sample Handling
D5088-90 Practice for Decontamination of Field Equipment Used at Nonradioactive
Waste Sites (Vol. 4.09).
D4547-91 Practice for Sampling Waste and Soils for Volatile Organics (Vol. 11.04).
D4840-95 Guide for Sample Chain of Custody Procedure (Vol. 11.01).
A9-5
-------
Monitoring Perfonaance—•Appendices
Appendix I: Major ASTM Guides and Practices Related to Waste
and Site Characterization and Sampling (cont.)
D4841-88 Practice to Estimation of Holding Time for Water Samples Containing Organic
and Inorganic Constituents (Vol. 11.01).
D4220-95 Practices for Preserving and Transporting Soil Samples (Vol. 4.08).
D5079-90 Practices for Preserving and Transporting Rock Core Samples (Vol. 4.09).
A.7 QA/QC
D5283-92 Practice for Generation of Environmental Data Related to Waste Management
Activities: QA/QC Planning and Implementation (Vol. 11.04).
D5612-94 Guide for the Quality Planning and Field Implementation of a Water Quality
Measurement Program (Vol. 11.01).
D5792-95 Practice for Generation of Environmental Data Related to Waste Management
Activities: Development of Data Quality Objectives (Vol. 11.04).
D5851-95 Guide for Planning and Implementing a Water Monitoring Program (Vol. 11.02).
A.8 Data Analysis and Contingency Planning
A.8.1 Statistical Analysis of Ground Water Quality Data
PS64-96 Guide for Developing Appropriate Statistical Approaches for Ground--
Water Detection Monitoring Programs (Vol. 4.09).
A.8.2 Graphic Analysis of Ground Water Quality Data
D5738-95 Guide for Displaying the Results of Chemical Analyses of Ground Water for
Major Ions and Trace Elements - Diagrams for Single Analyses (Vol. 4.09).
D5754-95 Guide for Displaying the Results of Chemical Analyses of Ground Water for
Major Ions and Trace Elements—Trilinear and Other Multi-Coordinate
Diagrams (Vol. 4.09).
D5877-95 Guide for Displaying the Results of Chemical Analyses of Ground Water for
Major Ions and Trace Elements — Diagrams Based on Data Analytical
Calculations (Vol. 4.09).
D6036-96 Guide for Displaying the Results of Chemical Analyses of Ground Water for
Major Ions and Trace Elements—Use of Maps (Vol. 4.09).
A.8.3 Geostatistical Analysis of Environmental Data
D5549-94 Guide for Reporting Geostatistical Site Investigations (Vol. 4.09).
D5922-96 Guide for Analysis of Spatial Variation in Geostatistical Site Investigations
(Vol. 4.09).
A9-6
-------
Monitoring Perfomance—Appendices
Appendix I: Major ASTM Guides and Practices Related to Waste
and Site Characterization and Sampling (cont.)
D5923-96 Guide for the Selection of Kriging Methods in Geostatistical Site Investigations
(Vol. 4.09).
D5924-96 Guide for the Selection of Simulation Approaches in Geostatistical Site
Investigations (Vol. 4.09).
A.8.4 Contingency Planning
D5745-95 Guide for Developing and Implementing Short-Term Measures or Early Actions
for Site Remediation (Vol. 11.04).
A9-7
-------
-------
TAKING CORRECTIVE ACTION
APPENDICES
-------
Taldng Coirectwe Action—Appendices
Appendix I: Examples of Interim Corrective Measures
The following is a list of possible interim measures for various waste management units and release types.
This list is not considered to be all-inclusive. More information is available through the Interim Measures
Guidance - Interim Find (U.S. EPA, 1988).
L Containers
Overpack or redrum
Construct storage area; move to new storage area
Segregation
Sampling and analysis
Treatment, storage, and/or disposal
Temporary cover
H Tanks
• Overflow; secondary containment
• Leak detection or repair; partial or complete removal
ffi. Surface Impoundments
Reduce head
Remove free liquids and highly mobile wastes
Stabilize or repair side walls, dikes, or liner(s)
Temporary cover
Run-on or run-off control (diversion or collection devices)
Sample and analyze to document the concentration of constituents
Interim ground-water measures
IV. Landfills
Run-on or run-off control (diversion or collection devices)
Reduce head or liner and/or leachate collection system
Inspect leachate collection, removal system, or french drain
Repair leachate collection, removal system, or french drain
Temporary cap
Waste removal
Interim ground-water measures
V. Waste Piles
• Run-on or run-off control (diversion or collection devices)
• Temporary cover
• Waste removal
• Interim ground-water measures
A10-2
-------
Taking Corrective Actioit—Appendices
Appendix I: Examples of Interim Corrective Measures (cont.)
VL Soils
• Sampling or analysis; disposal
• Run-on or run-off control (diversion or collection devices)
• Temporary cap or cover
VII. Ground Water
• Delineation or verification of gross contamination
• Sampling and analysis
• Interceptor trench, sump, or subsurface drain
• Pump-and-treat; in-situ treatment
• Temporary cap or cover
VIIL Surface-water Releases (Point and Non-Point)
Overflow or underflow dams
Filter fences
Run-on or run-off control (diversion or collection devices)
Regrading or revegetation
Sample and analyze, surface waters and sediments or point source discharges
DC Gas Mitigation Control
• Barriers, collection, treatment, or monitoring
X. Paniculate Emissions
• Truck wash (decontamination unit)
• Revegetation
• Application of dust suppressant
XL Other Actions
Fencing to prevent direct contact
Sampling offsite areas
Alternate water supply to replace contaminated drinking water
Temporary relocation of exposed population
Temporary or permanent injunction
A10-3
-------
Taldng Corrective Action—Appendices
Appendix II: Ground-Water Containment Technologies
This appendix briefly describes several commonly used technologies to contain contaminated
ground water.
L Ground-Water Pumping
Ground-water pumping can be used to manipulate and manage ground water for the pur-
pose of removing, diverting, and containing a contaminated plume or for adjusting ground-
water levels to prevent plume movement. For example, pumping systems consisting of a series
of extraction wells located directly downgradient from a contaminated source can be used to
collect the contaminated plume. Water can also be injected into the subsurface to move the
plume away from an area that must be protected, such as a domestic drinking water source.
The success of any contaminant capture system based upon pumping wells is dependent upon
the rate of ground-water flow and the rate at which the well is pumped. Thus, the zone of cap-
ture for the pumping system must be established.
n. Subsurface Drains
Pumping techniques represent an aggressive approach which requires ongoing maintenance
and operation throughout the life of the corrective measure. By contrast, subsurface drains
(and barrier walls, described below) represent a passive design, which do not require a high
level of ongoing maintenance. Subsurface drains are most useful in preliminary containment
applications for controlling pollutant migration, while a final treatment design is developed and
implemented. They also provide a measure of long-term protection against residual contami-
nants following conclusion of treatment and site closure.
Subsurface drains are essentially permeable barriers designed to intercept the ground-water
flow. The water must be collected at a low point and pumped or drained by gravity to the
treatment system. Subsurface drains can also be used to isolate a waste disposal area by inter-
cepting the flow of uncontaminated ground water before it enters into a contaminated site.
DDL Barrier Walk
Low permeability barriers are used to direct the uncontaminated ground-water flow around
the disposal site or to prevent the contaminated material from migrating from the site. Barrier
walls can be made of a wide variety of materials, as long as they have a lower permeability than
the aquifer. Typical materials include mixtures of soil and bentonite, mixtures of cement and
bentonite, or barriers of engineered materials (sheet piling). A chemical analysis of wall/conta-
minant compatibility is necessary to the final selection of materials. The installation of a low
permeability barrier usually entails a great deal of earth moving, requires a significant amount
of land area, and is expensive. Once in place, however, it represents a long-term, low mainte-
nance system. Active gradient controls, such as pumping and treating contaminated ground
water, installed after the barrier wall is in place will add to the long term operating costs of
these systems.
A10-4
-------
Taking Corrective Action—Appendices
Appendix III: Treatment Technologies
This appendix provides a brief overview of the five major treatment technology categories:
ground-water pump-and-treat, chemical treatment, biological treatment, thermal treatment,
and stabilization which may be used as part of the corrective action plan for a given site.
I. Ground-Water Pump-and-Treat
Pump-and-treat is one of the most widely used ground-water remediation technologies.
Conventional pump-and-treat methods involve pumping contaminated water to the surface for
treatment. Variations and enhancements of a conventional pump-and-treat system include
hydraulic fracturing as well as chemical and biological enhancements. Although the effective-
ness of pump-and-treat systems has been called into question, after two decades of use, this
approach remains a necessary component of most ground-water remediation efforts and is
appropriate for both restoration and plume containment.
Pump-and-treat systems are used primarily for hydraulic containment and treatment to
reduce the dissolved contaminant concentrations in ground water sufficiently, so that the
aquifer complies with clean-up standards or the treated water withdrawn from the aquifer can
be put to beneficial use. Although hydraulic containment and clean-up can represent separate
goals, more typically, remediation efforts are undertaken to achieve a combination of both.
Any ground-water clean-up effort will be undermined, unless inorganic and organic contam-
inant sources are identified, located, and eliminated, or at least controlled, to prevent further
contamination of the aquifer. Toxic inorganic substances may serve as a continuing source of
contamination through mechanisms such as dissolution and desorption. Source removal is the
most effective way to prevent further contamination.
Comprehensive characterization of the contaminated site helps to accurately assess the
types, extent, and forms of contamination in the subsurface and increases the likelihood of
achieving treatment goals. A thorough, three-dimensional characterization of subsurface soils
and hydrogeology, including particle-size distribution, sorption characteristics, and hydraulic
conductivity, provides a firm basis for appropriate placement of pump-and-treat wells. To be
effective, however, pump-and-treat efforts must go beyond initial site characterization, using
information gathered after remediation operations are under way to manage the well extraction
field dynamically. Dynamic management of the well extraction field based on more comprehen-
sive information can provide both economic and environmental benefits. In general, additional
information about the site and the pump-and-treat effort allows operators to make more
informed decisions about the efficient use of remediation resources.
A key component of the dynamic management approach is the effective design and opera-
tion of the pump-and-treat system. The following techniques can be useful in this regard:
• Using capture zone analysis, optimization modeling, and data obtained from moni-
toring the effects of initial extraction wells to identify the best locations for wells;
• Phasing the construction of extraction and monitoring wells so that information
obtained from operation of the initial wells informs decisions about siting subse-
quent wells; and
A10-5
-------
Taking Corrective Action—Appendices
Appendix III: Treatment Technologies (cont.)
• Phasing pumping rates and the operation of individual wells to enhance contain-
ment, avoid stagnation zones, and ensure removal of the most contaminated ground
water first.
The basic operating principle of a pump-and-treat system calls for locating a well (or wells) and
then pumping at rates that cause all water in a contaminant plume to enter the well rather than
continue traveling through the subsurface. In recent years, numerous mathematical models have
been developed or applied to compute capture zone, ground-water pathlines, and associated travel
times to extraction wells or drains. For relatively simple hydrogeologic settings (homogeneous
isotropic aquifers), analytical equations solved manually, using graphical techniques or computer
codes based on analytical solutions, may be adequate. For more complex sites, numerical comput-
er models may be required. These models provide insight to flow patterns generated by alternative
pump-and-treat approaches and to the selection of monitoring points and frequency.
Removal of contaminated ground water should be a dynamic process that uses information
on the response of the ground-water system to improve the efficiency of pumping operations.
Elements of efficient pumping operations can include:
• Combined plume containment and source remediation;
• Phased construction of extraction wells to allow data on the monitored response of
the aquifer to pumping operations to be used in siting subsequent wells;
• Adaptive pumping so that extraction and injection can be varied to reduce zones of
stagnation; and
• Pulsed pumping to increase the ratio of contaminant mass removed to ground-
water volume where mass transfer limitations restrict dissolved contaminant
concentrations.
Once extraction wells have brought contaminated water to the surface, treatment is relatively
straightforward, provided that appropriate methods have been selected, and the capacity of the
treatment facility is adequate.
n. Chemical Treatment
Chemical treatment is a class of processes in which specific chemicals are added to wastes or
to contaminated media in order to achieve detoxification. Depending on the nature of the cont-
aminants, the chemical processes required may include pH adjustment, lysis, oxidation, reduc-
tion, or a combination of these. Thus, chemical treatment is used to effect a chemical transfor-
mation of the waste to an innocuous or less toxic form. In addition, chemical treatment is often
used to prepare for or facilitate the treatment of wastes by other technologies.
In general, chemical treatment processes are applicable to a broad range of organic and inor-
ganic wastes. For example, they can be used for the oxidation of organics, for pH adjustment
to precipitate heavy metals, and for lysis of chlorinated organics to cleave chlorine atoms from
A10-6
-------
Taking Corrective Action—Appendices
Appendix III: Treatment Technologies (cont.)
organic molecules in preparation for subsequent oxidative processes. Chemical treatment
processes rely on the intimate mixing of reagents with the waste. Thus, the wastes generally
treated by chemical means must be in an aqueous or slurry form.
Chemical treatment processes can generally be implemented either ex-situ or in-situ. In-situ
treatment can be used, when it is uneconomical to haul or when infeasible or uneconomical to
dig or pump the contaminated waste matrix for treatment in a reactor. This approach should
be used whenever excavation or removal causes an increased threat to human health; it can
reduce the cost of a remediation program. Because chemicals are applied to the contaminated
waste matrix, specifically soil and ground water, a potential exists for reaction with the soil.
Permeability problems can occur as the result of precipitate formation. This can result in inade-
quate mixing of the contaminant with the treatment chemical and gas generation.
A brief description of the three major chemical treatment options pH adjustment, oxidation
and reduction processes, and lysis processes are provided below.
A. pH Adjustment
The function of pH adjustment is to neutralize acids and bases and to promote the forma-
tion of precipitates, which can subsequently be removed by conventional settling techniques.
These purposes are not mutually exclusive; precipitates can be formed as the result of neutral-
izing a waste. Conversely, neutralization of the waste stream can result when adjusting the pH
to effect chemical precipitation. Typically, pH adjustment is effective in treating inorganic or
corrosive wastes.
B. Oxidation and Reduction Processes
Oxidation and reduction must both take place in any such reaction. In any oxidation reaction,
the oxidation state of one compound is raised (i.e., oxidized) while the oxidation state of another
compound is lowered (i.e., reduced). Oxidation and reduction reactions are utilized to change the
chemical form of a hazardous material, in order to render it less toxic or to change its solubility,
stability, separability, or otherwise change it for handling or disposal purposes. In the reaction, the
compound supplying the oxygen (or chlorine or other negative ion) is called the oxidizer or oxi-
dizing agent, while the compound accepting the oxygen (i.e., supplying the positive ion) is called
the reducing agent. The reaction can be enhanced by catalysis, electrolysis, or photolysis.
C Lysis Processes
The basic function of lysis processes is to split molecules to permit further treatment.
Hydrolysis is a chemical reaction in which water reacts with another substance. In the reaction,
the water molecule is ionized while the other compound is split into ionic groups. Photolysis,
another lysis process, breaks chemical bonds by irradiating a chemical with ultraviolet light.
Catalysis uses a catalyst to achieve bond cleavage.
III. Biological Treatment
Biological treatment is a destruction process relying primarily on oxidative or reductive
A10-7
-------
Taldng Corrective Action—Appendices
Appendix III: Treatment Technologies (cont.)
mechanisms. Enzymatic activity can effect lysis (e.g., hydrolysis or dehalogenation). Further,
biological activity can result in pH changes in the waste stream which may require adjustment
by chemical means. The use of biological treatment processes is directed toward accomplishing
(1) destruction of organic contaminants, (2) oxidation of organic chemicals whereby the organ-
ic chemicals are broken down into smaller constituents, and (3) dehalogenation of organic
chemicals by cleaving a chlorine atom(s) or other halogens from a compound. Biological treat-
ment processes have certain advantages over other common treatment technologies, such as
the organic contaminants to be destroyed are used and transformed by bacteria or other organ-
isms as a source of food. These processes can be employed in soils, slurries, or waters (such as
ponds or ground water) to aid in the remediation of a site.
Biological processes can be used on a broad class of biodegradable organic contaminants.
Some compounds, called refractiles, are persistent compounds which are not readily
biodegradable. It should be noted that very high concentrations as well as very low concentra-
tions of organic contaminants are difficult for biological processes to treat.
Biological treatment processes can be used to treat organic contaminants in liquid, slurry,
and soil matrices. However, it should be remembered that moisture is an essential need of the
biomass both for growth and to provide mobility either of the food to the biomass or the bio-
mass to the organic. Thus, matrices which do not have sufficient moisture will not support
biodegradation, and methods to add moisture may have to be engineered into the system.
Since microorganisms need appropriate conditions in which to function, an engineer must
provide an optimum environment, whether aboveground in a reactor or belowground for an
in-situ application. The primary environmental factors which can affect the growth of the
microbial community, in addition to providing them sufficient food (organic material), are pH,
temperature, oxygen concentration, nutrients, and toxicity.
pH. Typically, the biological treatment system operates best when a waste stream is at a pH near
7. However, waste treatment systems can operate (with some exceptions) between pH values of
4 and 10. The exceptions are aerobic systems in which ammonia is oxidized to NOxas well as
anaerobic methane fermentation systems. For these, the pH should be between 6 and 8. At the
extremes of this range, the system will function, but efficiency will suffer.
Temperature. Waste treatment systems can function over a very wide temperature range of 5
to 60 C. However, there are three rather distinct ranges in which different groups of organ-
isms function:
Psychrophilic
Mesophilic
Thermophilic
<15C
15 to 45 C
>45C
Most waste treatment systems operate in the mesophilic region. The expense of altering the
temperature of wastes encountered in abnormally cold or warm environments indicates the desir-
ability of developing organisms which are suited to extremes of ambient waste temperatures.
Oxygen. Microorganisms need a certain amount of oxygen not only to survive but also to
mediate their reactions. Therefore, the residual dissolved oxygen concentrations should be
A10-8
-------
Taking Corrective Action—Appendices
Appendix III: Treatment Technologies (cont.)
maintained at approximately 2 mg/1 or greater within a typical liquid biotreatment system.
Having this much oxygen "left over" indicates that sufficient oxygen was available for the
biological process.
Nutrients. Nutrients can be classified into three groups based on levels required in waste
treatment systems. The major nutrients can be identified from the generalized biomass for-
mula (C60H82O23N12P). The actual quantity needed depends on the biochemical oxygen
demand (BOD) of the waste. The higher the BOD, the greater the quantity of cells produced.
The minor and trace nutrients are needed in small quantities and are given in terms of con-
centration, because these are the levels needed in solution to force the small amount
required inside the cell across the cell-wall membrane.
Toxicity. The presence of toxic substances will obviously produce adverse conditions in a
biological system. Unfortunately, it is difficult to cite specific toxic materials because toxicity
depends on concentration. All of the nutrients previously mentioned can be toxic if their
concentration is excessive. All types of organic compounds which can be used as food by
bacteria can be toxic if the level is high enough. Thus, our concept of a toxic substance is a
substance which is toxic at a very low concentration. In addition, phenomena such as accli-
mation, antagonism, and synergism will alter toxicity effects. Frequently, toxicity concerns
can be avoided by waste dilution and by microbe acclimation. Acclimation is most impor-
tant when dealing with "toxic waste." For example, with acclimated biomass, a few mil-
ligrams per liter of phenol can produce toxicity; but after acclimation, waste treatment sys-
tems can easily handle wastes containing up to 500 mg/1 of phenol.
The two types of biological treatment processes, aerobic and anaerobic, are described below.
A Aerobic Processes
Aerobic processes are oxidative processes and are the most widely used biological treatment
processes for organic wastes. These processes rely on providing the basic environmental condi-
tions required for biological growth but use differing methods for maintaining the microorgan-
isms in the system and contacting the organic material with the biomass. Since these systems
require a supply of molecular oxygen, the cost of supplying oxygen frequently sets an econom-
ic limit on the concentration of organics which can be present in the wastewater. For conven-
tional systems, a limit of approximately 10,000 mg/1 BOD is a good rule of thumb. For situa-
tions where the flow is low, however, higher concentrations can be economically biodegraded.
Engineered aerobic processes include suspended growth systems, fixed-film systems, hybrid
reactors, and in-situ application.
B. Anaerobic Processes
Anaerobic treatment of hazardous wastes has not been widely used in aboveground reactors
or in-situ. All anaerobic biological treatment processes achieve the reduction of organic matter
to methane and carbon dioxide in an oxygen-free environment. This is accomplished by using
cultures of bacteria which include facultative and obligate anaerobes. Anaerobic bacterial sys-
tems include hydrolytic bacteria (catabolize saccharides, proteins, lipids); hydrogen producing
A10-9
-------
Taking Corrective Action—Appendices
Appendix III: Treatment Technologies (cont.)
acetogenic bacteria (catabolize the products of hydrolytic bacteria, such as fatty acids and neu-
tral end products); homolactic bacteria (catabolize multicarbon compounds to acetic acid); and
methanogenic bacteria (metabolize acetic and higher fatty acids to methane and carbon diox-
ide). The strict anaerobes require totally oxygen-free environments and oxidation reduction
potentials of less than -0.2V Micro-organisms in this group are commonly referred to as
methanogenic consortia and are found in anaerobic sediments or sewage sludge digesters.
These organisms play an important role in reductive dehalogenation reactions, nitrosamine
degradation, reduction of epoxides to olefins, reduction of nitro groups, and ring fission of aro-
matic structures. Available anaerobic treatment concepts are based on such approaches as the
classic well-mixed system, the two-stage system, and the fixed bed.
IV. Thermal Treatment
Incineration can be applied to most organic-bearing wastes under various conditions. Wastes
may be burned which contain relatively high water content, are largely inorganic in nature
(meaning they possess high ash content), or are in the solid or semi-solid state. To decide
whether incineration is the best technology for a specific waste, consideration must be given to
the following issues:
• Limitations which arise from the quantity or nature of the waste;
• The environmental impact of incineration, including stack and fugitive emissions;
• The requirements for disposal of residues such as ash and air pollution control
residues; and
• Permitting issues.
Incineration is an oxidative process which is used for detoxification and sterilization, volume
reduction, energy recovery, and by-product chemical recovery. The incineration process may be
viewed as consisting of four parts:
• Preparation of the feed materials for placement in the incinerator (pretreatment);
• Incineration or combustion of the material in a combustion chamber;
• Cleaning of the resultant air stream by air pollution control devices; and
• Disposal of the residues from the application of the process.
Thermal processes are typically used for highly toxic waste or highly concentrated organic
wastes. If the waste contains PCBs, dioxins, or other toxic substances, incineration should be
chosen in order to assure destruction. If the wastes contain greater than 1,000 parts per million
of halogens (chlorinated materials), it would probably be desirable to select incineration of
these wastes, after consideration of other options. In any case, a material may be incinerated or
used as a fuel if the heat content is greater than 8,500 BTUs per pound or, if between 2,500
and 8,500 BTUs, it may be incinerated with auxiliary fuel. The waste components of concern
are halogens, alkali metals, and heavy metals. Incineration processes are available to destroy
organics in liquids, solids/sludges, soils and gases.
The types of incinerators which can be employed for incineration of liquid wastes include:
• Liquid injection furnaces;
A10-10
-------
Taking Corrective Actionr—Appendices
Appendix III: Treatment Technologies (cont.)
• Plasma arc incinerators; and
• Rotary kilns.
The thermal processes applicable to detoxify organics in a solid/sludge matrix include the
following incinerators:
• Rotary kiln;
• Fluidized bed;
• Circulating bed; and
• Infrared.
Applications of thermal processes to contaminated soils are somewhat limited. Two processes,
rotary kiln and in-situ -vitrification, offer a mechanism to detoxify organic contaminated soils.
V. Stabilization
The intent of stabilization/solidification processes is to immobilize toxic or hazardous con-
stituents in a waste by:
• Changing the constituents into immobile forms;
• Binding them in an immobile, insoluble matrix; and/or
• Binding them in a matrix which minimizes the waste material surface exposed to
solvent.
Often, the immobilized product has a structural strength sufficient to prevent fracturing over
time. Solidification accomplishes the intended objective by changing a non-solid waste material
into a solid, monolithic structure that ideally will not permit liquids to percolate into or leach
materials out of the mass. Stabilization, on the other hand, binds the hazardous constituents into
an insoluble matrix or changes the hazardous constituent to an insoluble form. Other objectives
of solidification/stabilization processes are to improve handling of the waste and produce a stable
solid (no free liquid) for subsequent use as a construction material or for landfilling.
Waste characteristics such as organic content, inorganic content, viscosity, and particle size
distribution can affect the quality of the final solidified product. These characteristics inhibit
the solidification process by affecting: the compatibility (or incompatibility) of the binder and
the waste; the completeness of encapsulation; and the development of preferential paths for
leaching due to spurious debris in the waste matrix. Selection of any particular technique for
waste treatment must include careful consideration of the intended purpose for the action, the
cost of processing, the increase in bulk of material produced, and the changes in the handling
characteristics of the resultant by-products. The design and location of any placement area or
landfill that eventually receives the treated waste is also a major consideration in deciding on
the physical properties that will be required of the stabilization process.
Major categories of industrial waste solidification/stabilization systems are cement-based
processes, pozzolanic processes (not including cement), thermoplastic techniques, organic
polymer techniques, surface encapsulation techniques, and self-cementing techniques (for high
calcium sulfate sludges). Vitrification can also be considered a solidification process.
A10-11
-------
Taking Corrective Action—Appendices
/-\p|JCMUIA IV. IICaUIICTIIL ICV-1 II IWIWV^ICO _>v-i c^i MI iv-4 ividLii/N.
A10
Bating Codes
1 - Better; O - Average;
A - Worse. + - See
Definition in Table 3-la.
¥-Yes;N-No.
F- Full; P -Pilot.
S - Solid; L- Liquid;
V - Vapor.
NA - Not Applicable
-Inadequate.
O&M - Operation &
Maintenance; Cap -
Capital; B - Both
Development Status
Treatment Train
(excludes off-gas treatment)
Residuals Produced
O&M or Capital
Intensive
Availability
System Reliability/
Maintainability
Cleanup Time
•to
a
p
I
1
1
j
1
1
1
1
1
Soil, Sediment, and Sludge
3.1 In Situ Biological Treatment
4.1 Bioventing
4.2 Enhanced
Bioremediation
•• Aerobic
•• Anaerobk
4.3 Land Treatment
4.4 Natural
Attenuation
4.5 Phvtoj-emediatlQii
•• Enhanced Rhizosphere
Biodegradatkm
•• Phyto-accumulation
•• Phyto-degradation
•• Phyto-stabilization
F
F
F
F
P
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
O&M
N
O&M
N
+
+
*
+
A.
*
*
^
*
O
+
+
+
^
Zv
•
*
*
*
•
•
•
•
•
o
*
•
•
+
0
^
*
*
^
o
^
+
+
*
•o
•
•
•
+
m
A
*
^\
+
A
^
^
^
*
A.
1
•
<*
*
•
3.2 In Situ Phvsical/Chemical Treatment
4.6 Electrokinetic
Separation,
£,7 Fracturing
•• Blast-Enhanced
• Lasagna Process
- Pneumatic Fracturing
4.8 Soil Flushing
•• Cosolvenls Enhancement
4.9 Soil Vapor
Extraction
4.10 Solidification
/Stabilization
F
F
F
F
F
Y
Y
N
N
N
L
N
L
L
S
O&M
O&M
O&M
O&M
B
•
A
•
•
O
0
0
0
•
o
O
o
^
o
o
©
O
A
•
o
o
o
•
•
•
o
o
•
•
•
0
0
o
o
•
o
o
o
o
•
^
o
o
•
^
•
o
•
A
•
0
£*.
A
A
•
A
o
A
A
A
-12
-------
Taking Corrective Action—Appendices
~^HF-
JCIIUIAIV. iieauiitMii ieei ii luiuyitfb outftMiii iy ividuiA ^u.
3.3 In Situ Thermal Treatment
4.11 Thermallv
Extraction
•• Electrical Resistance Heating
•• Radio Frequency/
Electromagnetic Heating
•• Hot Air Injection
P
N
N
N
A
•
A
•
0
o
•
•
•
A
A
A
3.4 Ex Situ Biological Treatment (assuming excavation)
,4.12 Biopiles
4.13 Composting
4.14 Fungal
Biodegradation
••White Rot Fungus
4.15 Landf arming
4.16 Slurrv Phase
Biological Treatment
F
F
F
F
F
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
O&M
N
B
•
•
A
m
o
•
•
A.
•
0
o
0
A
A
o
•
•
•
•
o
•
•
+
•
•
•
•
*
•
•
+
*
4-
*
*
4
*
4>
*
4
•1 +
•
4
•
•
4
A
4
4
^
A
A
^
^
•
•
•
4
•
3.5 Ex Situ Physical/Chemical Treatment (assuming excavation)
4.17 Chemical
Extraction
•• Acid Extraction
•• Solvent Extraction
4.18 Chemical
Reduction /Oxidation
4.19 Dehalogenation
•• Base-Catalyzed Decomposition
•• Glycolate/ Alkaline
Polyethylene Glycol (A/PEG)
4.20 Separation
•• Gravity Separation
•• Magnetic Separation
•• Sieving/Physical Separation
4.21 Soil Washing
4.22 Soil Vapor
Extraction
4.23 Solar
Detoxification
4.24 Solidification
/Stabilization
•• Bituminization
•• Emulsified Asphalt
•• Modified Sulfur Cement
•• Polyethylene Extrusion
•• Pozzolan/Portland Cement
•• Radioactive Waste
Solidification
•• Sludge Stabilization
•• Soluble Phosphates
•• Vitrification/Molten Glass
F
F
F
F
F
F
P
F
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
L
S
V
S
S
L
L
N
S
B
N
B
O&M
B
N
Cap.
Cap.
o
•
.A.
•
•
•
0
•
o
•
A
o
o
•
o
•
A
•
A
•
•
0
o
•
A
o
A
o
0
•
o
o
o
o
o
0
•
A
o
o
o
0
o
•
A
•
o
0
0
•
o
o
•
o
o
o
•
o
0
O
O
A
•
•
O
A
•
•
A
•
•
A
^
•
o
A
A
A.
A
A.
A
•
•
A
A
A
•
A
•
A
Jin.;—
A10-13
-------
Taking Corrective Actionr—Appendices
-Appendix iv: ireaimeni lecnnoiogies screening ividinx \^u\
AIO-1^
3.6 Ex Situ Thermal Treatment (assuming excavation)
1,25 HoLGas
pecontamination
4-26 Incineration
Circubting Bed Combustor
HuidizcdBcd
Infrared Combustion
Rotary Kiln
4.27 Open Burn /Open
Detonation
4.28 Pvrolvsis
•HuldizedBcd
• Molten Salt Destruction
•Rotary Kiln
4.29 Thermal
Desorption
• High Temperature
• Low Temperature
P
F
F
F
F
N
N
N
N
Y
N
L
S
V
S
L
S
L
S
B
B
B
B
B
O
•
•
£*.
m
•
o
•
I
o
•
•
•
•
•
•
z\
•
A
0
A
A
O
A.
A
O
A
A
•
A
A
•
A
A
0
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
•
•
•
I
•
3.7 Containment
4 30 LandfilLCai)
• Asphalt/Concrete Cap
•RCRA Sub title C Cap
•RCRA Subtitle D Cap
4,31 Landfill Cap
inhaneemerjLts
• Water Harvesting
• Vegetative Cover
MA
NA
N
N
NA
NTA
N
N
•
•
•
•
z^
^
•
•
O
O
O
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
A
A
O
0
3.8 Other Treatment
4.32 Excavation,
Retrieval, and OffeSite
Disposal
ISTA
N
NTA
N
•
•
m
^
O
O
0
o
O
O
A
O
Ground Water, Surface Water, and Leachate
3.9 In Situ Biological Treatment
4.33 Co-metabolic
Treatment
4.34 Enhanced
3iodegradatton
•• Nitrate Enhancement
•• Oxygen Enhancement with Air
Sparging
•• Oxygen Enhancement with
Hydrogen Peroxide
4.35 Natural
Attenuation
4.36
Phvtoremediation
•• Enhanced Rhizosphere
Biodegradation
•• Hydraulic Control
•• Phyto-Degradation
•• Phyto-VolaBlization
P
F
F
P
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
O&M
O&M
O&M
N
z±
m
•
0
+
*
+
•
+•
+
A.
+
*
•
•
•
O
4-
+
o
•
•
0
+
*
0
>
•
O
A
A
A
•
A
A
A
A
o
o
A
•
\
it.;-
-------
Taking Corrective Action^—Appendices
-M|J
penuix iv. iredimeni leuuiuiuyieb ^ueeniny ividinx ^co
3.10 In Situ Phvsical/Chemical Treatment
4.37 Aeration
4.38 Air Sparging
4.39 Biosluroine
4.40 Directional Wells
(enhancement)
4.41 Dual Phase
Extraction
4.42 Fluid /Vapor
Extraction
4.43 Hot Water or
Steam
Flushing / Stripping
4.44 Hvdrofracturing
4.45 In-Well Air
Stripping
•- Circulating Wells
4.46 Passive
/Reactive Treatment
Walls
•• Funnel and Gate
•• Iron Treatment Wall
F
F
F
F
F
F
P
P
P
F
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
V
V
L
V
NTA
L
V
L
V
L
V
N
L
V
S
N
N
N
Cap.
O&M
O&M
Cap.
N
Cap.
Cap.
•
•
•
A
•
•
•
I
•
•
O j •
•
O
O
O
O
A
•
•
I
•
O
•
O
O
m
a
o
A
•
•
•
I
o
o
0
o
o
I
•
•
o
o
•
•
0
o
•
•
•
•
o
0
•
•
0
o
•
•
o 1 o
A
•
0
A
o
•
o
0
•
A
•
0
•
A
o
•
o
0
•
•
•
•
0
•
•
•
o
•
o
Aj A
Aj A
A
O
A
A
A
O
I
•
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
O
O
A
A
A
O
A
•
3.11 Ex Situ Biological Treatment
4.47 Bioreactors
4.48 Constructed
Wetlands
F
F
N
N
s
S
Cap.
Cap.
•
A
O
*
o
*
o
o
0
0
*
0
A
•
A
A
•
•
3.12 Ex Situ Physical/Chemical Treatment (assuming pumping)
4.49 Adsorption/
Absorption
•• Activated Alumina
•• Forager Sponge
•• Lignin Adsorption/ Sorptive
Clays
•• Synthetic Resins
4.50 Air Stripping
EBl Granulated
Activated Carbon
(GAQ/Liauid Phase
Carbon Adsorption
4.52 Ion Exchange
4.53 Precipitation/
Coagulation
/Flocculation
• Coagulants and Flocculation
P
F
F
F
F
N
N
N
Y
Y
s
L
V
S
S
S
I
O&M
O&M
N
N
O
•
•
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
I
o
B
O
O
A
•
*
•
•
o
•
•
A
A
o
•
•
A
A
o
0
•
A
A
o
o
•
A
A
A
o
o
A
A;
•
A
A
*
A
A
• 0
•
O
A
A
A
A
I
ni.;-
A10-15
-------
TaMng Corrective Action—'Appendices
r- Appendix V: Treatment Technologies Screening Matrix
4.54 Separation
•• Distillation
•• Filtration/ Ultrafiltration
/Mkrofiltration
•• Freeze Crystallization
•• Membrane Pervaporation
•• Reverse Osmosis
4.55 Sprinkler
irrigatiorx
••Trickling Filter
4.56 UV Oxidation
••UV Photolysis
F
F
F
Y
Y
N
S
S
L
N
B
N
B
•
•
•
•
0
A
•
O
NA
A
O
4
A
A
4
A
A
A
j
A
•
3.13 Containment
4,57 Deep Well
Injection
4.58 Ground Water
Purnp-iriEr
• Surfactant Enhanced Recovery
• Drawdown Pumping
^SiSlunyJMalJs
F
F
F
N
N
N
S
L
••
JNA
N
B
Cap.
•
•
•
O
•
•
NA
NA
•
•
A
•
0
O
O
0
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
0
O
0
O
0
O
O
0
A
A
0
O
O
3.14 Air Emissions/Off-Gas Treatment
4,60 Biofiltration
4.61 HighJEnergy
P^s traction
•• High Energy Corona
• Tunable Hybrid Plasma Reactor
4-62 Membrane
Separation
4.63 Oxidation
•• Catalytic Oxidation
•• Internal Combustion Engine
Oxidation
•• Thermal Oxidation
•• Ultraviolet Oxidation
4.64 Vapor Phase
Carbon Adsorption
•• VOC Recovery and Recycle
F
P
P
F
F
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
S
L
N
N
N
S
N
I
I
N
N
O
A
A
•
-
4
A
A
-
•
•
NA
NA
NA
NA
•
O
O
•
•
•
4
"
•
*
"
O
4
•
0
•
•
O
A
O
A
A
O
NA
NA
NA
\TA
^A
4
A
O
O
•
A10-16
-------
Taking Corrective Action—Appendices
Appendix V: A Citizen's Guide to Innovative Treatment
Technologies
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Solid Waste and
Emergency Response
(5102G)
EPA 542-F-96-001
April 1996
vxEPA A Citizen's Guide to
Innovative Treatment
Technologies
For Contaminated Soils, Sludges, Sediments, and Debris
Technology Innovation Office
Technology Fact Sheet
What are innovative treatment
technologies?
Treatment technologies are chemical, biological, or
physical processes applied to hazardous waste or contami-
nated materials to permanently change their condition.
This Citizen's Guide focuses on treatment technologies
for soil, sludge, sediment, and debris.
Treatment technologies destroy contaminants or change
them so that they are no longer hazardous or, at least, are
less hazardous. They may reduce the amount of contami-
nated material at a site, remove the component of the
waste that makes it hazardous, or immobilize the contami-
nant within the waste,
Innovative treatment technologies are newly invented
processes that have been tested and used as treatments for
hazardous waste or other contaminated materials, but still
lack enough information about their cost and how well
they work to predict their performance under a variety of
operating conditions.
Why use an innovative technology?
Treatment of contaminated sludges and soils is a field of
technology that has developed and grown since Congress
passed the "Superfund" law for contaminated waste site
cleanup in 1980. An initial approach to eliminate a
hazardous waste from a particular location was to move it
somewhere else, or cover it with a cap. These methods
use land disposal as the solution to the problem. With an
increasing number of cleanups underway, and the passage
of amendments to the Superfund law in 1986 that stated a
preference for treatment, demand developed for alterna-
tives to land disposal that provided more permanent and
less costly solutions for dealing with contaminated
materials. Development and use of more suitable treat-
ment technologies has progressed.
As knowledge about the cleanup of contaminated sites
increases, new methods for more effective, permanent
cleanups will become available. Innovative treatment
technologies, which lack a long history of full-scale use,
do not have the extensive documentation necessary to
make them a standard choice in the engineering/scientific
community. However, many innovative technologies have
been used successfully at contaminated sites in the United
States, Canada, and Europe despite incomplete verifica-
tion of their utility. Some of the technologies were
developed in response to hazardous waste problems and
some have been adapted from other industrial uses.
Developing and perfecting treatment technologies is an
on-going process, as shown in Figure 1 on page 2. The
process begins with a concept — an idea of how to treat a
particular hazardous waste. The concept usually under-
goes a research and evaluation process to prove its
feasibility. If the concept is found to be useful, often the
next step is to undergo bench-scale testing. During bench-
scale testing, a small-scale version of the technology is
Why Use Innovative Treatment Technologies?
They offer cost-effective, long-term solutions to hazardous waste clean-up problems.
They provide alternatives to land disposal or incineration.
They are often more acceptable to surrounding communities than some established treatment technologies.
Printed on Recycled Paper
A10-17
-------
Taking Corrective Action—Appendices
Appendix V: A Citizen's Guide to Innovative Treatment
Technologies (cont.)
Are Innovative Treatment Technologies
Always the Right Choice?
Although innovative treatment technologies may
be less expensive and even more effective than
established technologies, science and
engineering professionals must determine which
technology is most appropriate at a given site.
built and tested in a laboratory. During this testing, it is
considered an emerging technology. If it is successful
during bench-scale testing, it is then demonstrated at
small-scale levels at field sites. If successful at the field
demonstrations, the technology often will be used full-
scale at contaminated waste sites. As the technology is
used and evaluated at different sites, it is continuously
improved.
Only after a technology has been used at many different
types of sites and the results fully documented, is it
considered an established technology. The majority of
technologies in use today are still classified as
innovative.
What types of treatment technologies
are in use?
Established technologies such as incineration and
solidification/stabilization have been the most widely
used at Superfund sites. By 1990, however, 40 percent of
the treatment technologies used were innovative. In 1994
the figure reached almost 60 percent. Table 1 on page 3
describes some of the most frequently used innovative
treatment technologies.
How is a treatment technology selected
for a site?
Before a treatment technology can be selected for a
Superfund site, detailed information about the site
conditions and contaminants must be collected. EPA uses
this information to determine which of the possible
remedies will be capable of meeting the clean-up stan-
dards that EPA has set
A treatability study is often conducted to assess a treat-
ment technology's potential for success. It is conducted
on contaminated material from the site, either when the
treatment technology is being considered or after selec-
tion of the remedy, in order to collect additional operation
and performance information.
There are three levels of a treatability study. The level
chosen depends on the information available about the
site and technology and the nature of information that is
needed. The quickest, least expensive treatability study is
the laboratory screening. It is done to learn more about
the characteristics of the waste to determine if it would be
treatable by a particular technology. A laboratory screen-
ing test takes a matter of days and generally costs from
$10,000 to $50,000. Successful laboratory screening may
lead to more sophisticated treatability studies.
The next level of a treatability study is the bench-scale
study which provides greater information on the perfor-
mance (and, in some cases, the cost) of a technology by
simulating the treatment process using a very small
quantity of waste. The objective of this type of test is to
determine if the technology can meet the clean-up
standards set for the site. These tests typically cost
between $50,000 and $250,000.
At the highest level, the pilot-scale treatability study is
usually conducted in the field or the laboratory and
requires installation of the treatment technology. This
study is used to provide performance, cost, and design
objectives for the treatment technology. Due to the cost of
this type of study—generally more than $250,000—it is
used almost exclusively to fine-tune the design of the
technology following other treatability studies.
What happens if a technology does not
work?
There is always a possibility that a treatment technology,
established or innovative, may not work once it is in full-
scale operation in spite of the best engineering design.
Site conditions that could not be predicted from the
smaller-scale studies are often to blame. Natural condi-
tions are far more complex than laboratory conditions.
Figure 1
Developing Treatment Technologies
A10-18
P-
Concept
• Idea
• Research
• Laboratory
Screening
r-
Emerging
• Bench-Scale Study
, — — r
Innovative
• Pilot-Scale . Chosen for • Limited Full-
Study or Field Cleanup Scale Use
Demonstration
w
Established
• Common Full-Scale
Use
-------
Taking Corrective Action—Appendices
Appendix V: A Citizen's Guide to Innovative Treatment
Technologies (cont.)
Table 1
Descriptions of Some Innovative Treatment Technologies
Soil Vapor Extraction removes contaminant vapors from soil (without having to dig it up) through the use
of vacuum extraction wells placed in the ground. Contaminants are collected for further treatment.
Air Sparging injects air into the ground below the contaminated area, forming bubbles that rise and carry
trapped and dissolved contaminants to the surface where they are captured by a soil vapor extraction
system.
Bioremediation uses microorganisms, such as bacteria in engineered processes, to break down organic
contaminants into harmless substances.
Thermal Desorption heats soil at relatively low temperatures to vaporize contaminants with low boiling
points. Vaporized contaminants then are captured and removed for further treatment or destruction.
Soil Washing uses water or a washing solution and mechanical processes to scrub excavated soils and
remove hazardous contaminants.
Chemical Dehalogenation converts contaminants that contain halogens (chlorine and fluorine, for
example) to less toxic substances through controlled chemical reactions that remove or replace halogen
atoms.
Solvent Extraction separates hazardous organic contaminants from oily-type wastes, soils, sludges, and
sediments, reducing the volume of hazardous waste that must be treated.
In Situ Soil Flushing floods contaminated soils beneath the ground surface with a solution that flushes the
contaminants to an area where they can be extracted.
A technology may be adapted or redesigned to treat
targeted waste, despite initial failures. In some rare cases
a different technology may have to be designed and
installed. Experience with and increasing use of innova-
tive treatment technologies will lead to better and faster
ways to clean up the environment.
Where are innovative treatment
technologies being selected?
Industry is using technologies labeled as "innovative" by
EPA for containing and treating the hazardous wastes
generated during manufacturing processes. Innovative
technologies also are being used under many federal and
state clean-up programs to treat hazardous wastes that
have been improperly released on the land. For example,
innovative technologies are being selected to manage
contamination (primarily petroleum) at some leaking
underground tank sites. They also are being selected to
clean up contamination that resulted from past disposal
practices at industrial sites regulated under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act, and to clean up
contamination at uncontrolled hazardous wastes sites,
known as Superfund sites. One innovative treatment
technology, soil vapor extraction, is now routinely used in
federal and state clean-up programs. As more cost and
performance data are documented, innovative treatment
technologies will be increasingly recognized for their
effectiveness.
Why is EPA encouraging the use of
innovative treatment technologies?
The Environmental Protection Agency is encouraging the
selection of innovative treatment technologies for site
remedies because they have the potential to be more cost-
effective and to provide better and more efficient
cleanups. In addition, they are often more acceptable to
surrounding communities than established treatment
technologies.
A10-19
-------
Taking Corrective Actions-Appendices
Appendix V: A Citizen's Guide to Innovative Treatment
Technologies (cont.)
EPA Supports the Use of Innovative Treatment Technologies
The mission of EPA's Technology Innovation Office (TIO) is to increase government and industry use of
innovative treatment technologies at contaminated waste sites.
Numerous other efforts to increase the use of innovative technologies are described in the EPA fact
sheet entitled Progress in Reducing Impediments to the Use of Innovative Remediation Technology.
(The document number is EPA 542-F-95-008 and can be ordered from NCEPI at the address given
below.)
For More Information
The U.S. EPA's Technology Innovation Office has produced a series of Citizen's Guides, including this one, on topics
relating to innovative treatment technologies:
• A Citizen's Guide to Soil Washing, EPA 542-F-96-002
• A Citizen's Guide to Solvent Extraction, EPA 542-F-96-003
* A Citizen's Guide to Chemical Dehalogenatlon, EPA 542-F-96-004
• A Citizen's Guide to Thermal Desorption, EPA 542-F-96-005
• A Citizen's Guide to In Situ Soil Flushing, EPA 542-F-96-006
• A Citizen's Guide to Bioremedlation, EPA 542-F-96-007
• A Citizen's Guide to Soil Vapor Extraction and Air Sparging, EPA 542-F-96-008
• A Citizen's Guide to Phytoremediation, EPA 542-F-96-014
• A Citizen's Guide to Natural Attenuation, EPA 542-F-96-015
• A Citizen's Guide to Treatment Walls, EPA 542-F-96-016
Some other publications of interest include:
• Selected Alternative and Innovative Treatment Technologies for Corrective Action and Site Remediation: A
Bibliography of EPA Resources, EPA 542-B-95-001. A bibliography of EPA publications about innovative
treatment technologies.
• Innovative Treatment Technologies: Annual Status Report (7th Ed.), EPA 542-R-95-008. A description of
sites at which innovative treatment technologies have been used or selected for use.
• Innovative Treatment Technologies: Annual Status Report Database. An automated computer database of
descriptions of sites at which innovative treatment technologies have been used or selected for use. The
database can be downloaded free of charge from EPA's Cleanup Information bulletin board (CLU-IN). Call CLU-
IN at 301 -589-8366 (modem). CLU-IN's help line is 301 -589-8368. The database also is available for purchase
on diskettes. Contact NCEPI for details.
Copies of the items listed above are available from:
National Center for Environmental Publications and Information (NCEPI)
P.O. Box 42419
Cincinnati, OH 45242
Fax your order request to 513-489-8695 or call 513-489-8190
If these documents are out of stock, you may be directed to other sources. In this case, there may be a charge for
some of these documents.
NOTICE: This l*ct sheet & Intended solely as general guidance and Information. It is not intended, nor can it be relied upon, to create any rights enforceable by any
ptrty in Stigatloa with the United States. The Agency also reserves the right to change this guidance at any time without public notice.
A10-20
-------
Taking Corrective Action—Appendices
Appendix VI: Commonly Used Institutional Controls
This appendix provides a brief description of seven types of institutional controls that have
been commonly used. This is not an exhaustive list of all possible institutional controls.
I. Deed Restrictions
Deed restrictions place limits and conditions on the use and conveyance of land. They serve
two purposes: informing prospective owners and tenants of the environmental status of the
property and ensuring long-term compliance with the institutional controls that are necessary
to maintain the integrity of the remedial action over time.
Typically there are four requirements for a promise in a deed restriction (also called a
"restrictive covenant") to be held against current and subsequent landowners.
• The conveyance of land must be documented in writing.
• The deed restriction should precisely reflect what the parties' intentions are in
regard to the scope and the duration of the restrictions.
• There should be "privity of estate" so that states may enforce a deed restriction.
• The promise "touches and concerns the land."
E. Use Restrictions
Use restrictions are usually the heart of what is in a deed restriction. Use restrictions
describe appropriate and inappropriate uses of the property, in an effort to perpetuate the bene-
fits of the remedial action and ensure property use that is consistent with the applicable clean-
up standard. Such techniques also prohibit any person from making any use of the site in a
manner that creates an unacceptable risk of human or environmental exposure to the residual
contamination.
Use restrictions address uses that may disturb a containment cap or any unremediated soils
under the surface or below a building. A prohibition on drinking on-site (or off-site by means
of well restriction areas discussed below) ground water may also be appropriate. As an exam-
ple, a program may allow a restriction of record to include one or more of the following:
• Restricting property use;
• Conditioning the change of use from nonresidential to residential on compliance
with all applicable clean-up standards for a residential property;
• Restricting access; or
• Restricting disturbance of department-approved remedial effects.
Well restriction areas can be a form of institutional control by providing notice of the exis-
tence of contaminants in ground water and by prohibiting or conditioning the placement and
use of any or all types of wells within the area.
HI. Access Controls
Another subset of institutional controls is the control of access to any particular site. Access
can be controlled by either fencing and gates, security, posting or warnings. A state may use
A10-21
-------
Taking Corrective Actioit—^ppendices
— Appendix VI: Commonly Used Institutional Controls (cont.)
the following criteria to determine the appropriate level and means of access control:
• Whether the site is located in a residential or mixed-use neighborhood;
• Proximity to sensitive land-use areas including day care centers, playgrounds, and
schools; and
• Whether the site is frequently traversed by neighbors.
IV. Notice
Regulations of this type generally provide notice of specific location of contamination on the
site and disclose any restrictions on access, use, and development of part or all of the contaminat-
ed site to preserve the integrity of the remedial action. The three types of notices that are
described in this appendix are record notice, actual notice, and notice to government authorities.
A. Record Notice
Some states require that sites having releases of hazardous waste file a notice on the land
records providing to any subsequent purchaser of the property information regarding the past
or current activities on the site. The record notice may be broad; the program may require any
property subject to a response action to obtain a professional opinion and then prepare and
record a Grant of Environmental Restriction that is supported by that opinion. The record
notice can be ancillary to a transfer act, in which case recording of an environmental statement
is only required in conjunction with a land transaction.
B. Actual Notice
States may require direct notice of environmental information to other parties to a land
transaction. These laws protect potential buyers and tenants, and they also help ensure that use
restrictions and other institutional controls are perpetuated. Actual notice of an environmental
defect or failure to provide notice may give a party the right to cancel the transaction and may
result in civil damages.
C Notice to Government Authorities
Parties to a land transaction may also be required to file the environmental statement with
various environmental authorities. Notice to the government may be required before the trans-
action takes place.
V. Registry Act Requirements
Some states have registry act programs that provide for the maintenance of a registry of haz-
ardous waste disposal sites and the restriction of the use and transfer of listed sites. The registry
includes the location of the site and a listing of the hazardous wastes on the property and may
also include a classification of the level of health or environmental danger presented by the con-
ditions on the property. When a site appears on the state registry, the owner must comply with
regulatory requirements in regard to use and transfer of the site. The use of a site listed on the
A10-22
-------
Taking Corrective Actions-Appendices
Appendix VI: Commonly Used Institutional Controls (cont.)
registry may not be changed without permission of the state agency. (This list of registry act
programs has been included only as an illustrative example of institutional controls.)
VI. Transfer Act Requirements
Some states have transfer act programs that require full evaluation of all environmental
issues before or after the transfer occurs. It may be that, within such a program, institutional
controls can be established by way of consent order, administrative order, or some other tech-
nique that establishes implementation and continued responsibility for institutional controls. A
typical transfer act imposes obligations and confers rights on parties to a land transaction aris-
ing out of the environmental status of the property to be conveyed. Transfer acts impose infor-
mation obligations on the seller or lessor of a property. That party must disclose general infor-
mation about strict liability for clean-up costs as well as property-specific information, such as
presence of hazardous substances, permitting requirements and status, releases, and enforce-
ment actions and variances.
VII. Contractual Obligations
One system for ensuring the future restriction on use of a site, or the obligation to remediate
a site, is to require private parties to restrict use by contract. While this method is often negoti-
ated among private parties, it will be difficult, if not impossible, to institutionalize some control
over that process without interfering with the abilities and rights of private parties to freely
negotiate these liabilities. Another avenue is for the landowner or responsible party to obligate
itself to the state by contract. The state may require a contractual commitment from the party
to provide long-term monitoring of the site, use restrictions, and means of continued funding
for remediation.
A10-23
-------
-------
PERFORMING CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE CARE
APPENDICES
-------
Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care—Appendices
r Appendix I: Example Closure and Post-Closure Estimate Form'
(All Costs Shown in ($000)
Provisions
i.
ii.
Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Plan
Final Cover
111.
iv.
Final Cover Vegetation
Maintenance Program for Final Cover
and Final Cover Vegetation
v. Maintenance Program for Side Slopes
vi. Run-On and Run-off Control Program
vii. Maintenance Program for Run-On and
Run-off Control System
viii. Ground-water Monitoring Wells
ix. Maintenance Program for Ground-water
Monitoring Wells
x. Ground-water Monitoring
xL Methane Gas Venting or Evacuation System
xii. Maintenance Program for Methane Gas
\%nting or Evacuation System
xiii. Leachate Collection and/or Control System
xiv. Maintenance Program for Leachate
Collection and/or Control System
xv. Facility Access Control System
xvi. Maintenance Program for Facility Access
Control System
xvii. Measures to Conform die Site to
SuroundingArea
xviii. Maintenance Program for Site Conformance
Measures
Total Closure
Costs
Yrs. ( - )
Total Post-
Closure Costs
Yrs. ( - )
Total Closure/Post
Gosure Costs
xix. Construction Quality Assurance and Quality
Control
TOTAL COSTS
*Developed from New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Landfill Engineering
Landfill Permits
AH-2
-------
Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care—Append*.
'ices
Appendix I: Example Closure and Post-Closure Estimate Form -j
(All Costs Shown in ($000) (cont.)
Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Plan
Final Cover Vegetation
Maintenance Program for Final Cover
and Final Cover Vegetation
Maintenance Program for Side Slopes
vi. Run-On and Run-off Control Program
vii. Maintenance Program for Run-On and
Run-off Control System
viii. Ground-water Monitoring Wells
ix. Maintenance Program for Ground-water
Monitoring Wells
x. Ground-water Monitoring
xi. Methane Gas Venting or Evacuation System
xii. Maintenance Program for Methane Gas
Venting or Evacuation System
xiii. Leachate Collection and/or Control System
xiv. Maintenance Program for Leachate
Collection and/or Control System
xv. Facility Access Control System
xvi. Maintenance Program for Facility Access
Control System
xvii. Measures to Conform die Site to
Surounding Area
xviii. Maintenance Program for Site Conformance
Measures
xix. Construction Quality Assurance and Quality
Control
TOTAL COSTS
A11-3
-------
Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care—Appendices
— Appendix II: Sample Cost Estimating Worksheets* —
LANDFILLS LF-1
INVENTORY - Page 1 of 1
The inventory worksheet will be used in completing the appropriate cost estimating worksheets to
determine the cost of closure activities. If the design characteristics of the landfill or unit being
closed do not confonn to the format of the worksheet below, alternative methods should be used to
accurately determine the area of the landfill or unit being closed, and the volume of materials being
used to construct the final cover.
ATI -4
1 AREA OF LANDFILL
Calculate the area of the landfill to determine the cost of constructing a final cover.
1.A
1.B
1.C
1.D
Length
Width
Area of Landfill (Multiply line 1.A by line
1.B)
ft
ft
ft2
Area in yd2 (Divide line 1 .C by 9 ftz/yd2)
''«, "f'fff '*$,'> '" ''- '' *
yd2
ti . 4-f~. y^'i^^^^^/^^'-y^1^^ ^'- /, '— v .?
2 VOLUME OF CLAY LAYER
2. A
2.B
2.C
Thickness of clay layer
Volume of Clay Layer (Multiply line 1.C by
line 2.A)
ft
ft3
Volume of Clay Layer in yd3 (Divide line 2.B by 27 fttyd3)
•. f S > ' "* f _,
' ff ;/ ^ > ^ _v „
3 VOLUME OF SAND OR GRAVEL
3.A
3.B
3.C
Thickness of sand or gravel layer
Volume of Sand or Gravel Layer (Multiply
line I.Cby line 3.A)
ft
ft3
Volume of Sand or Gravel Layer in yd3 (Divide line 3.B by 27 ft3/yd3)
' ,: /* '- -./'- •
yd3
*', ';p!,'s "V^'^l^Jf \ \" ';J *" ;x~ ' *;' '^'V',,/'™ -'*"*,?'' ''",'' -' " < *
4 VOLUME OF TOPSOIL LAYER
4.A
4.B
4.C
Thickness of topsoil
Volume of Topsoil Layer (Multiply line 1 .C
by line 4.A)
ft
ft3
Volume of Topsoil Layer in yd3 (Divide line 4.B by 27 ft'Vyd3
k*:-,/*>"~* ';,'"'
yd3
•Worksheets generated from CostPro©: Closure and Post-Closure Cost Estimating Software, available from Steve
Jeffords of Tetra Tech EM Inc., 404 225-5514, or 285 Peach Tree Center Avenue, Suite 900, Altanta, GA, 30303.
-------
Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care—Appendi
aces
Appendix II: Sample Cost Estimating Worksheets (cont.)
LANDFILLS
LF-2
Facility Name:
Notes:
1 Decontamination Worksheets are found in Chapter 12.
b Sampling and Analysis Worksheets are found in Chapter 13.
c Monitoring Well Installation Worksheets are found in Chapter 14.
d Transportation Worksheets are found in Chapter 15.
c Treatment and Disposal Worksheets are found in Chapter 16.
f Post-Closure Care Worksheets are found in Chapter 17.
ff^ft^
t$f*lj?l*< *,&•
" f??l£? i&3iif$$$$&& ^f^lWP.I?*^'* V C? 'MM' JW" Pf^?*? '
Activity
Some of the activities listed below are routine. The owner or
operator might elect or be required to conduct additional
activities. Italic type denotes worksheets for estimating the costs
of those additional activities.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
1O.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
Installation of Clay Layer
Installation of Geomembrane
Installation of Drainage Layer
Installation of Topsoil
Establishment of Vegetative Cover
Installation of Colloid Clay Liner
Installation of Asphalt Cover
Decontamination'
Sampling and Analysis"
Monitoring Well Installatiorf
Transportation'1
Treatment and Disposal*
Subtotal of Closure Costs (Add lines 1 through 1 2)
Worksheet
. Number
LF-3
LF-4
LF-5
LF-6
LF-7
LF-8
LF-9
DC-1
SA-2
MW-1
TR-1
TD-1
Engineering Expenses (Engineering expenses are typically 1 0% of closure
costs, excluding survey plat, certification of closure, and post-closure
care.)
Survey Plat
Certification of Closure
LF-10
LF-11
Subtotal (Add engineering expenses and cost of the survey plat,
certification of closure, and post-closure care to closure costs (Add lines 12
through 16]}
Contingency Allowance (Contingency allowances are typically 20% of
closure costs, engineering expenses, cost of survey plat, cost of
certification of closure, and post-closure care.)
Post-Closure Care'
PC-1
TOTAL COST OF CLOSURE (At/dimes 17, 18 sad 19)
fl^ig&i^l
I
Cost
$
s
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
AH-5
-------
Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care—Appendices
Appendix II: Sample Cost Estimating Worksheets (cont.)
LANDFILLS
LF-3
INSTALLATION OF CLAY LAYER - Pago 1 of 2
1 PURCHASE AND DELIVERY OF CLAY
1.A
1.B
1.C
1.D
1.E
1.F
1.G
1.H
Volume of clay required (Enter from
worksheet LF-1, line 2.C)
Compaction factor (use 0.40 if unknown)
Volume of additional clay required (Multiply
line 1 .A by line 1.8)
Total volume of clay required (Add lines 1 .A
and 1 -C) (One yd3 minimum; round up to the
nearest whole number)
Cost of clay per yd3
yd3
yd3
yd3
/yd3
Subtotal of cost of clay (Multiply line 1 .D by line 1 .E)
Cost of delivery of clay per yd3
/yd3
Subtotal of cost to deliver clay (Multiply line 1 .D by line 1 .G)
1.! Cost to Purchase and Deliver Clay (Add lines 1 .F and 1.H)
2. SPREADING AND COMPACTING CLAY LAYER
2.A
2.B
2.C
2.D
2.E
2.F
Labor and equipment cost per work hour
Choose the appropriate level of PPE:
a. Protection Level D $ /work hr
b. Protection Level C $ /work hr
c. Protection Level B $ /work hr
Work rate required to spread one yd3 of clay
Number of hours required to spread clay
(Multiply line 1 .D by line 2.B) (One-hour
minimum; round up to the 0.5 hour)
Subtotal of labor and equipment costs to spread clay (Multiply line 2.A
by line 2.C)
Labor and equipment cost per work hour
Choose the appropriate level of PPE:
a. Protection Level D $ /work hr
b. Protection Level C $ /work hr
c. Protection Level B $ /work hr
Work rate required to compact one yd3 of
clay
work hr/yd3
A11-6
-------
Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care—Appendices
Appendix II: Sample Cost Estimating Worksheets (cont.)
LANDFILLS
LF-3
1NSTALLA T7OJV OF CLA Y LA YER - Page 2 of 2
2.G
2.H
2.1
2.J
Number of hours required to compact clay
(Multiply line 1 .D by line 2.F) (One hour
minimum; round up to the O.5 hour)
work hrs
Subtotal of labor and equipment costs to compact clay (Multiply line
2.E by line 2.G)
Cost of mobilization and demobilization
Cost to Spread and Compact Clay Layer (Add lines 2.D, 2.H, and 2.1)
''^^M^
$
$
$
^ ;" r:.^$ ,^s;«V, ;',;>v ''.$+;*:& Ax^->x ^fvf^; ' S- " - V'' ;iV
3 TESTING OF CLAY LAYER
For cost estimation, clay testing should be completed for every 1 2,000 ft2 of area for each lift or 6-
inch layer. Assume that it takes 6 lifts to construct a compacted two-foot day layer. During
installation of the clay layer, the properties of the clay being placed must be tested to assure that the
clay layer meets specific engineering requirements. Each clay lift must be tested for liquid limits,
plasticity index, moisture content, in-place density, reconstituted permeability, and a gradation
analysis.
3.A
3.B
3.C
3.D
3.E
Area of landfill (Enter from landfill inventory
worksheet, line 1 .C)
Number of tests per clay lift (Divide line 3.A
by 1 2,OOO ft2 and round up to the nearest
whole number)
Total number of tests required (Multiply line
3.B fay 6 lifts)
Cost per set of tests
ft2
tests
tests
$
Cost to Perform Tests (Multiply line 3.C by line 3.D)
TOTAL COST OF INSTALLATION OF CLAY LAYER (Add lines 1.1, 2.J, and
3.E) (Enter total on worksheet LF-2, fine 1)
>.>..':. ..'. '.?.'" '«••' >' - % < , *
$
$
A11-7
-------
Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care—Appendices
Appendix II: Sample Cost Estimating Worksheets (cont.)
LANDFILLS
LF-4
A11-8
INSTALLATION OF GEOMEMBRANE - Page 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
Area of landfill (Enter from worksheet LF-2,
line 1 .C)
Cost to install geomembrane liner per ft2
Subtotal to install geomembrane liner
(Multiply line 1 by line 2)
Cost of engineering controls, inspection, and
testing (Multiply line 3 by 0.25)
ft2
$ /ft2
$
$
• TOTAL COST OF INSTALLATION OF GEOMEMBRANE (Add lines 3 and 4)
(Enter total on worksheet LF-2. line 2)
'MSr|f^:;
'3^%5fi§
$
-------
Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care—Appendices
t-
•AjJJJCIIUIA II. ^dllljJItf V_UbL CbUMlclUMy VVUI Nbl ItftJO ^UJIlL.; —
LANDFILLS LF-5
INSTALLATION OF DRAINAGE LAYER - Page 1 of 2
1 PURCHASE AND DELIVERY OF SAND OR GRAVEL
1.A
1.B
1.C
1.D
1.E
1.F
1.G
1.H
1.1
Volume of sand or gravel required (Enter
from worksheet LF-1 , line 3.C)
Compaction factor (use 0.075 if unknown)
Volume of additional sand or gravel
required (Multiply line 1 .A by line 1 .8}
Total volume of sand or gravel required
(Add lines 1 .A and 1 .C)
Cost of sand or gravel per yd3
yd3
yd3
yd3
$ /yd3
Subtotal of cost to purchase sand or gravel (Multiply line 1 .D by line
1.E)
Cost of delivery of sand or gravel per yd3
$ /yd3
Subtotal of cost to deliver sand or gravel (Multiply line 1 .D by line
1-G)
Cost to Purchase and Deliver Sand or Gravel (Add lines 1.F and 1.H)
'. &r fff " '•'''••. f * ""
': f r-- it f ff t f
*'•• f jXX, ./ 'ff '•> ., X'
-f v * ": -" V ^ ,
% f 5 ' ' "*" * * v
;r K^^,: ,J
A' * * ~"
: f ff ^ s, w. / f
•., -, "•'" s A i'"'"-- "' ;
>*• ^ f* ^ * '** * '
* * f wv,A f
' \V -'•• , X"1 f *" -' ^
' ' : ,„-; , ^ ' <=-•• ' y~
$
,:';; ;,.'-*•» ~ /~V,;^\"
$
$
<•""'/* <"\oxiV */ "''""'f^ '""^-" , - '" •. - - , - -"{ '/,;--- ,." **^~ »; >,-'',* *f'*-"'-'-™ '" 7"C" -%%
2 SPREADING AND COMPACTING SAND OR GRAVEL LAYER
2. A
2.B
2.C
2.D
2.E
2.F
Labor and equipment per yd3
$ /yd3
Subtotal of labor and equipment costs to spread sand or gravel
(Multiply line 1 .D by line 2.A)
Labor and equipment per yd3
$ /yd3
Subtotal of labor and equipment costs to compact sand or gravel
(Multiply line 1 .D by line 2.C)
Cost of mobilization and demobilization
Cost to Spread and Compact Sand or Gravel Layer (Add lines 2.B, '
2.D, and 2.E)
^>> - "Sss%s<% „ ' ••
$
\:/s', ,',:' .• •>•-•*,.«. "* ,-••', .<•'.'<•- ' . * "», " .. ,,'ff • ~ '•. -v ' " '"- T"~
t •.„> , -. - ^<^' „,•.„<•,',„' •• * >• s ' -" " }'"*, , -•• ;'.,%'" %
," l ' * , ^ •"• -% ' '- % ', > •. •• •., 5-v-. '
3 PURCHASE, DELIVERY, AND INSTALLATION OF GEOTEXT1LE FILTER FABRIC
3. A
3.B
3.C
Area of landfill (Enter from worksheet
LF-1, line 1.O)
Cost of geotextile filter fabric per yd2
yd2
$ /yd2
Cost to Purchase, Deliver, and Install Geotextile Filter Fabric
(Multiply line 3.A by line 3.B)
^ "™;\, ''- ' '" %%
'0^W% /' %'"%,'"5'
^ % ^ ^i^%*'
%^ f s '' ' •• ""
V" ' •.'•• " , ;
$
A11-9
-------
'erforming Closure and. Post-Closure Care—Appendices
Appendix II: Sample Cost Estimating Worksheets (cont.)
LANDFILLS
LF-5
INSTALLA TION OF DRAINAGE LA Y£R - Page 2 of 2
4.A
4.B
4.C
4.D
4.H
Length of landfill (Enter from worksheet
LF-2, line 1 .A)
Width of landfill (Enter from worksheet LF-
1 , fine 1 .B)
Length of drainage pipe needed (Add lines
4.A and 4.B and multiply total by 2)
Cost of drainage pipe per ft
ft
ft
ft
$ /ft
Cost to Purchase and Install Drainage Piping (Multiply line 4.C by
line 4.D)
TOTAL COST OF INSTALLATION OF DRAINAGE LAYER (Add lines 1 .1, 2.F,
3.C. and 4.E) (Enter total on worksheet LF-2, line 3)
iSltflS^;
$
*
A11-10
-------
Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care—Appendices
Appendix II: Sample Cost Estimating Worksheets (cont.)
LANDFILLS
LF-6
INSTALLATION OF TOPSOIL - Page 1 of 1
1 PURCHASE AND DELIVERY OF TOPSOIL
1.A
1.B
1.C
1.D
1.E
1.F
1.G
1.H
1.1
Volume of topsoil required (Enter from
worksheet LF-1 , line 4.C)
Compaction factor (use 0.25 if unknown)
Volume of additional topsoil required
(Multiply line 1 .A by line 1 .8)
Total volume of topsoil required (Add lines
1 .A and 1 .C) (One yd3 minimum; round up
to the nearest whole number)
Cost of topsoil per yd3
yd3
yd3
yd3
$ /yd3
Subtotal of cost to purchase topsoil (Multiply line 1 .D by line 1 .E)
Cost of delivery of topsoil per yd3
$ /yd3
Subtotal of cost to deliver topsoil (Multiply line 1 .0 by line 1 .G)
Cost to Purchase and Deliver Topsoil (Add lines 1 .F and 1 .H)
,• "*' *V "'
fs f
:' s"" % ' ? , ^ ''
•f * * ** ff •, "•
•"•*••. •> •> s
»" - % ' f'-^f
" s s ' s , V. s
V - ' %! > , •• ' s '
'*% -.^-. .'f ' ' ' ¥** s
••',••<-•••.•.' ,
' -''', '#..* „*"""
'„."',,--.*•,<• "' ;> v\,'%
,,'— ' ';''---
, ^ ,,^,,,;v,;, , ^ .,
$
C ;JV^'-'t^V'~'"'
$
$
-j- -*<&*-'•.-'*• vx ' "!"f ' ^^<''^^"/^^>4'^^'^^-'-' ^ ""V-V" -••-'.: ^/.'ir^'r-^j?™"™ <--,«-
~~, -""/':*<• zx ? W "' ' > - - ' * -> v- '- /" $& J " *-* - -Y*" "- * -? -' r* « #* V' ' -"„", - '„': -- ", '^:.. \s - - °
2 SPREADING AND COMPACTING TOPSOIL LAYER
2.A
2.B
2.C
2.D
2.E
2.F
Labor and equipment cost per yd3
$ /yd3
Subtotal of labor and equipment costs to spread topsoil (Multiply
line 1 .D by line 2.A)
Labor and equipment cost per yd3 to
compact topsoil
$ /yd3
Subtotal of labor and equipment costs to compact topsoil (Multiply
line 1 .D by line 2.C)
Cost of mobilization and demobilization .
Cost to Spread and Compact Topsoil (Add lines 2.B, 2.D, and 2.E)
TOTAL COST OF INSTALLATION OF TOPSOIL (Add fines 1 .1 and line 2.F)
(Enter total on worksheet LF-2, line 4)
', f • * ^ \ •• ^ •••
-. % %^-Vv
11 "' ' , ' "•
$
-*, -,, -* 4 -*,,%vl ,
% A.^vy s •> f
$
$
$
$
A11-11
-------
Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care—Appendices
Appendix II: Sample Cost Estimating Worksheets (cont.)
LANDFILLS
LF-7
ESTABUSHMENT OF VEGETATIVE COVER - Page 1 of 1
1 SOIL PREPARATION
1.A
1.B
1.C
1X>
1.F
Area of .landfill (Enter from worksheet
LF-1 , line 1 .C)
Convert area in ft2 to area in thousand
square feet (MSR (Divide line 1 .A by
I.OOOftVMSF}
Labor and equipment cost per MSF
ft2
MSF
$ /MSF
Cost of mobilization and demobilization
Cost to Prepare Soil (Multiply line 1.B by line 1.C and add line 1.D)
#t*j,^j? '£* /"ilf o--- ' '•> '- x >
: s ^J£>-Ji f'*? * '&ir ?' *''$•*,
f^'^O'^^;>;V-^
:m^^:>;
/•' „,•,,', i, ,~ '/y ,, ?..„
'$$&*?&•&>&'
\*>&<&.'; ^;sV*\«( ';'-', '
$
$
" • ' ' .",, ,i« ,\"i^<~'^ ^}i}'.'\'$t&c»"<'$
t i* , .. :„ ,<•!•» ,-ft" '* ^'4' '*,>*•'""<• ,/,"*'^ * x™>f #.»„'.; v /,•--<,' s"'rA'.-<.r- -^-v*/*- -/V,
2 SEEDING, FERTIU2ING, AND MULCHING
2^
2.B
2.C
Labor, material and equipment cost per
MSF
$ /MSF
Cost of mobilization and demobilization
Cost to Seed, Fertilize, and Mulch (Multiply line 1.B by line 2.A and add
lino 2.B)
TOTAL COST OF ESTABUSHMENT OF VEGETATIVE COVER (Add lines 1.F
and 2.C) (Enter total on worksheet LF-2, Una 5)
. fe v s% •&/vAC''v «A-^'->
-------
Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care—Appendices
Appendix II: Sample Cost Estimating Worksheets (cont.)
LANDFILLS
LF-8
INSTALLATION OF COLLOID CLAYUNER - Page 1 of 1
A colloid clay liner is an alternative to the traditional composite clay liner. Complete this
worksheet only if the owner's or operator's closure plan specifies the use of a colloid clay liner as
a substitute for a portion of the clay liner.
1
2
Area of landfill (Enter from worksheet LF-1 ,
line 1 .C)
Cost of installing colloid clay liner per ft2
TOTAL COST OF INSTALLATION OF COLLOID LINER
2} (Enter total on worksheet LF-2. line 6)
ft2
$ /ft2
(Multiply fine 1 by line
i«"'^vi, .S'i.t :
L"' ^ ,,'--^'
S ?> V's' '" *,#-,'• ^ -^
<",<-'/< J'V' J '-
: : -H>« c,s'f", \* „ - , '„•
$
A11-13
-------
Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care—Appendices
Appendix II: Sample Cost Estimating Worksheets (cont.)
LANDFILLS
LF-9
INSTALLATION OF ASPHALT COVER - Page 1 of 1
Complete this worksheet only if the cover material is specified to be asphalt. For an asphalt cover,
costs for installing topsoil and a vegetative cover will not be incurred and should not be estimated.
A1M4
Area of landfill (Enter from worksheet LF-1,
line 1 .D)
Cost of installing asphaltic concrete
pavement. Includes binder course and
wearing course
Subtotal of cost to install pavement (Multiply
line 1 by line 2)
Cost of engineering controls, inspection, and
testing (Multiply line 3 by 0.25)
ft2
/ft2
TOTAL COST OF INSTALLATION OF ASPHALT COVER {Add lines 3 and fine
4) (Enter total on worksheet LF-2, line 7)
• **"?**.**»<& f-
v^F"1/4 & '..*
-------
Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care—Appendices
l"^l «-**-» i i I *-/ I v^ *— .v_x *j \. I_.J 1.1 1 1 1141.11 1 V^ V V \*/ 1 IN..J1 1 V_ ^. L.J I \—\-/ 1 1 L. J --..—
POST-CLOSURE CARE PC-2
REMOVAL OF LEACHATE - Pogs 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
Volume of teachate to be removed per
removal event
Number of leachate removal events per year
Volume of leachate to be removed per year
(Multiply line 1 by line 2)
Removal cost of leachate per year (Multiply
line 3 by $ ..__'.__ per gallon)
Number of years in the post-closure care
period*
• gal
events/year
gal/year
$ /year
years
TOTAL COST OF REMOVAL OF LEACHATE (Multiply line 4 by line 5> (Enter
total on Worksheet PC-1, Una 1}
$
Notes:
* Assume 30 years of post-closure care, unless otherwise specified by the owner or operator.
ATMS
-------
Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care—Appendices
Appendix II: Sample Cost Estimating Worksheets (cont.)
POST-CLOSURE CARE
PC-2
REMOVAL OFLEACHATE - Page 1 of 1
Volume of teachata to be removed par
removal event
Number of leaehate removal events per year
Volume of leachate to be removed per year
(Multiply fine 1 by line 2)
Removal cost of leachate per year (Multiply
line 3 by $ _J per gallon)
Number of years in the post-closure care
period*
• ga»
events/year
gal/year
/year
years
TOTAL COST OF REMOVAL OF LEACHATE (Multiply line 4- by line 5) (Enter
total on Worksheet PC-1, line 1) _____^_
Notes:
" Assume 30 years of post-closure care, unless otherwise specified by the owner or operator.
A11-16
-------
Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care—Appendices
Appendix II: Sample Cost Estimating Worksheets (cont.)
POST-CLOSURE CARE PC-3
SITE SECURfTY - Pago 1 at 1
1 FENCING
1.A
1.B
1.C
Length of fencing*
Labor, material, and equipment cost per ft
ft
/ft
Cost to Fence Site (Multiply line 1-A by line 1.B)
2 CORNER POSTS
2.A
2.B
2.C
Number of corner posts required (if unknown,
assume four)
Cost per comer post
posts
/post
Cost to Erect Comer Posts (Multiply line 2-A by line 2.B)
3 GATES
3.A
3.B
3.C
Number of gates required {Assume minimum
of one unless otherwise specified)
Labor, materials, and equipment cost per gate $
gate(s)
/gate
Cost to Install Gates (Multiply line 3 .A by fine 3.B)
4 REFLECTOR SIGNS
4.A
4.B
4.C
Number of signs required (Assume a minimum
of four, unless otherwise specified)
Labor, materials, and equipment cost per sign
/sign
/sign
Total Cost to Install Signs (Multiply Una 4.A by fine 4.B)
TOTAL COST OF SITE SECURITY (Add Ones 1.C, 2.C, 3.C. and 4.C) (Enter total
on worksheet PC-1, Fine 2)
Notes:
1 Detennine the total length of fencing required by adding the lengths of all sides of the unit and multiply the
sum by 1.25. Hie factor of 1.25 allows additional space between the unit and fence for access to the unit.
ATM 7
-------
Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care—Appendices
Appendix II: Sample Cost Estimating Worksheets (cont.)
POST-CLOSURE CARE PC-4
MAINTENANCE OF VEGETATIVE COVER - Page J of 2
1 MOWING
1.A
1.B
1.C
1.D
1.E
1.F
1.G
1.H
j£aassgs?sc^w
Area of cover to be mowed (Enter from
worksheet LF-1. line 1.O>
Convert the area in ft? to MSF (thousand
square feat) (Divide line 1 A by 1,0001
Labor and equipment cost per MSF
Cost of one mowing event (Multiply line 1 .8
byline 1.C)
Number of mowing events per year
Number of years in the post-closure care
period*
Number of mowing events during the post-
closure care period (Multiply line 1 .£ by line
V.F)
ft1
MSF
$ /MSF
s /event
events/year
years
events
Cost to Mow for Post-Closure Care P«riod (Multiply line 1.D by fine
1 6)
3ffiajC3Sg»55fe6SfeEigsa!SS^^
!
:
'
i
$
PSpfpl$!iSl&Sg^^
2.A
2.B
2.C
2.D
2.E
2.F
2.G
Area of cover to be fertilized (Enter from
line 1 .8)
Labor, material, and equipment cost per
MSF
Cost of one fertilizing event (Multiply fine
2.A by line 2.B)
Number of fertilizing events per year
Number of years in the post-closure care
period*
Number of fertilizing events during the post-
closure care period (Multiply line 2.O by line
MSF
$ /MSF
$ /event
events/year
years
events
Cost to Fertffize for the Post-Closure Care Period (Multiply line 2.C by
Kn02.F)
l^^^^^^^M
9
A11-18
-------
Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care—Appendices
Appendix II: Sample Cost Estimating Worksheets (cont.)
POST-CLOSURE CARE
PC-4
MAINTENANCE OF VEGETATIVE COVER - Pago 2 of 2
3 WATERING '
3.A
3.B
3.C
3-D
3.E
3.F
3.6
Area of cover to be watered (Enter from
line 1 .B)
Labor and material cost per MSF
Cost of one watering event (Multiply line
3.A by line 3.B)
Number of watering events per year
Number of years in the post-closure care
period
Number of watering events during the post-
closure care period (Multiply line 3.D by line
3.E)
MSF
$ /MSF
$ /event
events/year
years
events
Cost to Water for the Poat-Closura Care Period {Multiply fine 3.C by
3.F)
TOTAL COST OF MAINTENANCE OF VEGETATIVE COVER CAdd lines 1.H.
2 G and 3.G) (Enter total on worksheet PC-1. fin* 3)
^^^^^^^^^§^^^^y^^ffff^
$
$'
Notes:
• Assume 30 years of post-closure care unless otherwise specified by the owner or operator.
A11-19
-------
Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care—Appendices
Appendix II: Sample Cost Estimating Worksheets (cont.)
POST-CLOSURE CARE
PC-5
MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION - Pago 1 of 7
If maintenance costs are not specifically indicated, the cost of maintaining and repairing die final
cover can be estimated based on a percentage of the cost of constructing the final cover (such as 20
percent). If the unit is closed and construction costs for the' final cover are not available, use
landfill worksheets LF-3 through LF-6, found in Chapter 7 to estimate the cost.
1 MAINTENANCE AND BEPAW OF FINAL COVER
1.A
1.B
1.C
1.0
1.E
Cost of Installing clay layer (Enter from
worksheet LF-2, line 1, or from owner or
operator information)' ^^^
Cost of installing geomembrana (Enter from
worksheet LF-2, fine 2, or from owner or
operator information)
Cost of installing drainage layer (Enter from
worksheet UF-2, line 3, or from owner or
operator information)
Cost of installing topsoil (Enter from
woricshaet LF-2, line 4. or from owner or
operator information)
Total COST of final cover (Add lines 1 .A, 1 .B,
1 .C, and 1.0)
1.F Cost to Maintain and Repair Final Cover (Multiply line 1.E by 0.20)*
2 POST-CLOSURE CARE INSPECTION
2.A
2.B
2.C
2.0
2.E
Cost of conducting one inspection
Number of inspections per year
Cost of conducting post-closure care
inspections per year (Multiply iina 2.A by line
2.B)
Number of years in post-closure period
/inspection
inspections/year
/year
years
Cost'to Conduct Post-Closure Care Inspections Over the Post-Closure
Care Parted (Multiply fine 2.C by line 2.D)
TOTAL COST OF MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION (Add lines 1.F and 2.B
(Enter total on worksheet PC-1. lin« 4)
Notes:
* The Landfill Summary Worksheet, LF-2, is provided in Chapter 7.
* Unless specified, it is estimated that ihe cost of maintaining and repairing the final cover during the post-
closure care period will be approximately 20 percent of the total cost of installing the final cover.
A11-20
-------
Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care—Appendices
Appendix II: Sample Cost Estimating Worksheets (cont.)
POST-CLOSURE CARE
PC-6
GROUNDWATER MONITORING - Pago 1 of 1
Number of years of groundwater monitoring
during the post-ctosura care period •
Cost of groundwater monitoring per year*
years
/year
TOTAL COST OF GROUNDWATER MONITORING (Multipla lina 1 by line 2)
(Enter on PC-1 worksheet, line 5)
Notes:
' Use worksheet SA-6 in Chapter 13 to determine the yearly cost of sampling and analysis of groundwater
during the post-closure care period.
ATI-21
-------
Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care—Appendices
Appendix II: Sample Cost Estimating Worksheets (cont.)
POST-CLOSURE CARE
PC-7
DEED NOTATION - Page 1 of 1
Attorney Faes
Clerical and deed filing fees*
TOTAL COST OF DEED NOTATION (Add fines 1 and 2) (Enter total on
woifcctwat PC-1, lint 6)
The fee for this activity is commonly a percentage of the assessed value of the propeny, but it can vary
according to local statutes.
A11-22
-------
Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care—Appendices
Appendix II: Sample Cost Estimating Worksheets (cont.)
POST-CLOSURE CARE
PC-8
MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION OF ASPHALT COVER - Pago 1 of1
1 MAINTENANCE OF ASPHALT COVER
1.A
1.B
l.C
1.D
1.E
Area of asphalt cover (Enter from
worksheet LF-1, fine 1.D, or enter from
owner or operator information)
Cost of sealcoating asphalt cover per yd2
Cost of one sealcoating event (Multiply line
1 .A by line 1.8)
Number of sealcoating events during the
post-closure care period (If not provided,
estimate sealcoating will be completed once
every five years)
yd1
/yd*
/event
events
Total Cost to Maintain Asphalt Cover (Multiply line 1 .C by KM 1 .D)
2 POST-CLOSURE INSPECTION
2.A
2.B
2.C
2.D
2.E
Cost of conducting one inspection
Number of inspection per year
Cost of conducting post-closure care
inspections per year
Number of years in post-closure*
/inspection
inspections/year
/year
years
Cost to Conduct Post-Closure Inspections Over the Post-Closure
Period (Multiply Hoe 2.C by 2.D)
TOTAL COST OP MAINTENANCE AND INSPECTION (Add lines 1.F, and 2.E)
(Enter total on worksheet PC-1,fine 7)
Nous:
* Assum 30 years of post-closure care, if not otherwise specified.
ATI-23
-------
Performing Closure and. Post-Closure Care—Appendices
Appendix II: Sample Cost Estimating Worksheets (cont.)
POST-CLOSURE CARE
PC-9
CERTIFICATION OF COMPLETION OF POST-CLOSURE CARE - Page 1 of 1
Number of units requiring certification of
complation of post-closure care
Cost of certification of completion of post-
closure care per unit
TOTAL COST OF CERTIFICATION OF POST-CLOSURE CARE (Multiply fine 1
by fine 2) (Enttr total on worksheet PC-1,Une 10)
A11-24
-------
Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care—Appendices
Appendix II: Sample Cost Estimating Worksheets (cont.)
LANDFILLS
LF-10
SURVEY PLAT- Page 1 of 1
1
2
3
Area of landfill (Enter from worksheet LF-1 ,
line 1 .C)
Convert area in ft2 to area in acres (Divide
line 1 by 43,560 ft2/acre)
Labor and materials cost per acre (Minimum
charge of one acre)
ft2
acres
$ /acre
TOTAL COST OF SURVEY PLAT (Multiply fine 2 by line 3} (Enter total on
worksheet LF-2, line 15}
"• ' ff. . ' . 4ft *VV Artv-s-^-W^ ^v *v.*
\ •.*•"*->;; V';t 4-fvv ,/•
Sf-. S f*s %, •• \.^Vff>f . v< %%w ' -•
Zf ' '^v.'fe^V^
"- -,y,-r -*- ?/ p-.C^ -'•
$.£&&&?*%'£ Z~
^ -' k'^^V-' *'? "/-?--
s/'V --^"' Xs •* f ~*^
•>*"""! '•'•/ '/"" -"••"• %' '"" •('
"fc\ '^x- 5' , , s ;;," ^/ >~' ••
' ' % A ). » ''#•!-„,
•'i-i ' •>';'- f ' " v '-? ;$,„
-«; - * ' *, ; ' '"* V /1%"™""^
$
A11-25
-------
Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care—Appendices
Appendix II: Sample Cost Estimating Worksheet (cont.)
LANDFILLS
LF-11
CERTIFICATION OF CLOSURE - Page 1 of 1
1
2
Number of units requiring certification of
closure*
Cost of certification of closure per unit
$
TOTAL COST OF CERTIFICATION OF CLOSURE (Multiply line 1 by line 2)
(Enter total on worksheet LF-2. line 16)
& '-""^y ""•;•' ' ' '"'>- ^ "-, '
3*<^^&*$
s^r&w
$
Notes:
Facilities closing a landfill that has multiple cells should include certification of closure in each partial
closure cost estimate.
A11-26
-------
Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care—Appendices
Appendix II: Sample Cost Estimating Worksheets (cont.)
SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS
SA-6
AaUEOUS SAMPLE - Page 1 of 2
Aqueous samples refer to liquid samples, including samples of rinsate and wastewater. Do nor use
this worksheet for estimating the cost of sampling other aqueous'media, such as groundwater.
1 COLLECTION OP AQUEOUS SAMPLE
1.A
1.B
1.C
1.D
1.E
Number of sampling locations (Enier from
worksheet SA-1; line 4)
Sampling team and equipment cost per work
hour*
Choose the appropriate level of PPE:
a. Protection Level D S /work hr
b. Protection Level C $ /work hr
c. Protection Level B $ /work hr
Work hours required to collect samples from
one sampling location
Number of hours required to collect all
samples (Multiply line 1 .A by line 1 .C)
Cost to Collect Aqueous Samples (Multiply line 1.B by line 1.D)
2 ANALYSIS OF AQUEOUS SAMPLE
2.A
2.B
2.C
Using the table in the attachment to this
worksheet, calculate the cost of analysis per
sampling event for aqueous samples (Enter
cost from the Attachment to this worksheet)
Enter the number of sampling events
/event
events
Cost to Analyze Aqueous Samples (Multiply line 2.A by lina 2.B)
TOTAL COST OF SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF AQUEOUS SAMPLES (Add
Una 1 .E to line 2.C) (Enter total on cost worksheet SA-2, line 4)
Notes:
Includes cost of collection and handling of samples, vehicle rental, and deconlamination of sampling team
and sampling equipment.
ATI-27
-------
'erfonning Closure and Post-Closure Care—Appendices
Appendix II: Sample Cost Estimating Worksheets (cont.)
SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS
SA-6
AQUEOUS SAMPLE ATTACHMENT - Page 2 of 2
Cost of Analysis per Sampling Event
Reference for Line 2.A
TOTAL COST FOR ANALYSIS OF AQUEOUS SAMPLES (Total of al costs
>n column 4}
Notes:
$7,280 /event
Identify the number of sampling locations and analyses specified in the work plan or permit. TheDumber
i/S?™™! roo samples is typically 20 percent of the total number of samples to be analyzed.
A11-28
-------
Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care—Appendices
Appendix III: Examples of Financial Assurance Mechanisms
Trust funds. A trust fund is an arrangement in which one party, the grantor, transfers cash,
liquid assets, certificates of deposit, or government securities into a fund controlled by a
special "custodian," the trustee, who manages the money for the benefit of one or more
beneficiaries. The trust fund should be dedicated to closure and post-closure care activi-
ties. Payments are made annually into the fund so that the full amount for closure and
post-closure care accumulates before closure and post-closure care activities start. Place a
copy of the trust agreement, which describes how the fund will be used to pay for closure
and post-closure care activities, in the waste management unit's operating record.
Escrow accounts. Escrow accounts are similar to trusts in that monies are legally segregated
for a specific purpose, such as closure and post-closure care, and are controlled by someone
other than the person who pays into the account. An escrow agent, like a trustee, has a fidu-
ciary relationship to both parties in the agreement and must manage the account under terms
specified in the escrow agreement. The purpose of an escrow account is to help execute an
underlying contract.
Surety bonds. A surety bond guarantees performance of an obligation, such as closure and
post-closure care. A surety company is an entity that agrees to answer for the debt or
default of another. Payment or performance surety bonds are acceptable in the event an
owner or operator fails to conduct closure and post-closure care activities. If you use a
surety bond or letter of credit, establish a standby trust fund (essentially the same as a trust
fund). In most cases, a standby trust fund is established with an initial nominal fee agreed
to by the owner or the operator and the trustee. Further payments into this fund are not
required until the standby trust is funded by a surety company. List the surety company as
an acceptable surety in Circular 570 of the U.S. Department of Treasury.
Letters of credit. A letter of credit is a formalized line of credit from a bank or another
institution on behalf of an owner or operator. This agreement states that it will make avail-
able to a beneficiary, such as a state, a specific sum of money during a specific time period.
The letter of credit should be irrevocable and issued for 1 year. The letter of credit should
also establish a standby trust fund.
Insurance. An insurance policy is basically a contract through which one party guarantees
another party monies, usually a prescribed amount, to perform the closure or post-closure
care in return for premiums paid. The policy should be issued for a face amount at least
equal to the current cost estimate for closure and post-closure care. The face amount refers
to the total amount the insurer is obligated to pay; actual payments do not change the face
amount.
Corporate financial tests. Corporate financial tests are a method for an owner and operator
to self-guarantee that they have the financial resources to pay for closure and post-closure
costs. These tests may require that a company meet a specified net worth, a specified ratio
of total liabilities to net worth, and a specified net working capital in the United States.
Implicit in using a financial test is a reliance on Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(GAAP) to provide fairly represented accounting data. Your financial statements should be
audited by an independent certified public accountant. If the accountant gives an adverse
opinion or a disclaimer of opinion of the financial statements, use a different financial
assurance mechanism.
A11-29
-------
Performing Closure and Post-Closure Care—Appendices
Appendix III: Examples of Financial Assurance Mechanisms
(cont.)
Corporate guarantees. Under a corporate guarantee, a parent company guarantees to pay
for closure and post-closure care, if necessary. The parent company should pass a financial
test to show that it has adequate financial strength to provide the guarantee. A financial test
is a way for guarantors to use financial data to show that their resources are adequate to
meet closure and post-closure care costs. The guarantee should only be used by firms with
adequate financial strength.
Other financial assurance mechanisms. If you consider other financial assurance
mechanisms, talk to your state to see if the mechanism is acceptable.
A11-30
------- |