United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Solid Waste And
Emergency Response
Washington, DC 20460
EPA/540/2-91/001
Number 2
September 1991
Innovative Treatment Technologies
Semi-Annual Status Report
Printed on Recycled Paper
-------
EPA/540/2-91/001
Number 2
September 1991
INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
SEMI-ANNUAL STATUS REPORT
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
Technology Innovation Office
Washington, DC 20460
-------
NOTICE
This material has been funded wholly or in part by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under contract
number 68-WO-QQ34 to PRC Environmental Management, Inc. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not
constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
-------
FOREWORD
In April 1990 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER)
established the Technology Innovation Office (TIO) to promote the use of innovative treatment technologies for contaminated site cleanup.
TIO's mission is to increase the application of innovative treatment technology by government and industry to contaminated waste sites, soils,
and ground water. One of TIO's goals is the removal of regulatory and institutional barriers to the development and use of innovative
technologies. Another is the provision of richer technology and market information to targeted audiences of federal agencies, States, consulting
engineering firms, responsible parties, technology developers, and the investment community.
This report documents the selection and use of innovative treatment in the Superfund program. It will allow better communication
between experienced technology users and those who are considering innovative technologies to clean up contaminated sites. The information
will also enable technology vendors to evaluate the market for innovative technologies in Superfund for the next several years.
As more information becomes available, we plan to expand this document to include cleanup programs other than Superfund. The use
of innovative treatment in Superfund and other EPA waste programs is addressed by a directive, "Furthering the Use of Innovative Treatment
Technologies in OSWER Programs" (OSWER Directive 9380,0-17, June 10,1991). This directive sets forth seven new initiatives to remove
impediments from and create incentives to the use of innovative treatment for Superfund, corrective action under the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA), and underground storage tank cleanups. It is hoped that efforts such as the directive and this document will increase
the reliance on new, less costly, or more effective technologies to address the problems associated with Superfund, hazardous waste, and
petroleum contamination.
Walter W. Kovalick, Jr., Ph.D.
Director, Technology Innovation Office
in
-------
ABSTRACT
This twice-yearly report documents and analyzes the selection and use of innovative treatment technologies in the
Superfund Program. It will allow better communication between experienced technology users and those who are considering
innovative technologies to clean up contaminated sites. In addition, the information will enable technology vendors to evaluate
the market for innovative technologies in Superfund for the next several years and will be used by EPA's Technology Innovative
Office to track progress in the application of innovative treatment.
Alternative treatment technologies are "alternatives" to land disposal. Innovative treatment technologies are alternative
treatment technologies for which use at Superfund-type sites is inhibited by lack of data on cost and performance. This report
documents the use of the following innovative treatment technologies to treat groundwater (in situ), soils, sediments, sludge,
and solid-matrix wastes;
» Ex situ Bioremediation » In situ Biorernediation
» Chemical treatment * Dechlorination
• In situ flushing « In situ vitrification
» Soil washing * Solvent extraction
• Thermal desorption • Vacuum extraction
The document includes information on 140 applications of innovative treatment technologies for remedial actions and
18 applications for emergency response actions. It contains several summary lists of the Superfund sites for which innovative
treatment technologies have been selected or used. Table 1 lists the sites by EPA region. Table 2 lists the sites by type of
innovative technology and gives the status of application of the innovative treatment technology. The principal part of the
document is Table 3 which contains detailed, site-specific information for sites where innovative treatment has been selected.
The information for Table 3 was collected through analyses of Records of Decision, review of OSWER tracking systems and
telephone interviews with EPA regional staff. The information in that table is analyzed and summarized in narrative and
figures in the overview of the document.
IV
-------
CONTENTS
Notice u
Foreword in
Abstract iv
List of Figures V1
•List of Abbreviations v'>
Acknowledgements vm
Overview *
Table 1 - EPA Regional Summary for Innovative Treatment Technologies 9
Table 2 - Project Status Summary by Innovative Treatment Technology 15
Table 3 - Detailed Site Information by Treatment Technology 21
Appendix
A, Remedial Sites Using Established Treatment Technologies A-l
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Number Page
1 Remedial Actions: RODs Signed by Fiscal Year 2
2 Remedial Actions: Source Control RODs by Fiscal Year 3
3 Remedial Actions: Overview of All Source Control RODs Through FY 90 3
4 Remedial Actions: Treatment versus Disposal RODs for Source Control 3
5 Remedial Actions: Summary of Alternative Treatment Technologies Through FY 90 4
6 Remedial Actions: Number of Established versus Innovative Treatment Technologies 5
7 Emergency Responses: Summary of Innovative Technologies Through August 1991 6
8 Remedial Actions: Project Status of Innovative Treatment Technologies as of August 1991 7
VI
-------
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
AM Action Memorandum
APEG Alkaline metal hydroxide/polyethylene glycol
ARCS Alternative remedial contracts strategy
ATTIC Alternative Treatment Technology Information Center
BCD Base Catalyzed Dechlorination
BTEX Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene
BTX Benzene, toluene, xylene
cy Cubic yards
DCA Dichloroethane
DCE Dichloroethylene
FAA Federal Aviation Administration
FY Fiscal year
gw Ground water
KPEG Potassium hydroxide/polyethylene glycol
NAPL Nonaqueous Phase Liquids
NPL National Priorities List
OSC On scene coordinator
OSWER Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
PAHs Poly nuclear aromatic hydrocarbons
PCBs Polychlorinated biphenyls
PCE Perehloroethylene (tetrachloroethylene)
PCP Pentachlorophenol
PRP Potentially responsible party
RA Remedial action
RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
RD Remedial design
RODs Records of Decision
RPM Remedial project manager
RSKERL Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory,
Ada, OK (U.S. EPA)
SARA Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act of 1986
SVOCs Semivolatile organic compounds
TCA Trichloroethane
TCE Trichloroethylene
TIO Technology Innovation Office
USAGE U, S. Army Corps of Engineers
USDA U. S. Department of Agriculture
VOCs Volatile organic compounds
vii
-------
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This document was prepared under the direction of Ms. Linda Fiedler, work assignment manager for the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency's Technology Innovation Office.
Collecting and analyzing information on 140 applications of innovative treatment technologies and summary information
on RODs required the help of many individuals, including; Butch Fries, Dana Mun and Nancy Willis of PRC Environmental
Management Inc.; William Hannon and Lynn Eberhardt of Booz-Allen & Hamilton; and the Regional Coordinators in the
Design and Construction Management Branch of the EPA Office of Emergency and Remedial Response.
Special acknowledgement goes to the regional and State staff listed .as contacts for individual sites. They provided the
detailed information contained and summarized here. Their cooperation and willingness to share their knowledge and expertise
on innovative treatment technologies encourages the application of those technologies at other sites.
Vlll
-------
OVERVIEW
Introductiori
The Technology Innovation Office (TIO) of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency's (EPA) Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response (OSWER) has prepared this Innovative Treatment Tech-
nologies: Semi-Annual Status Report to document the use of innova-
tive treatment technologies to remediate Superfund sites. The report
contains site-specific information on Superfund sites (both remedial
and emergency response actions) using innovative treatment. The
report is designed for use by site managers in evaluating cleanup
alternatives and for innovative technology vendors in identifying
potential markets. The information is also used by TIO to track
progress in the application of innovative treatment.
The report is updated biannually. This September 1991 issue of the
report updates and expands information provided in the January 1991
report. Additional information includes 45 innovative treatment tech-
nologies selected for remedial actions in fiscal year (FY) 1990
Superfund Records of Decision (RODs) and 18 innovative technolo-
gies used in emergency response actions. (A ROD is the decision
document used to specify the way a site (or part of a site) will be
remediated.)
What Are Alternative and Innovative Treatment Technologies?
Alternative treatment technologies are "alternatives" to land disposal.
The most frequently used alternative technologies are incineration
and solidification/stabilization. Innovative treatment technologies
are alternative treatment technologies for which lack of data on
performance and cost inhibit their use for many Superfund types of
applications. In general, a treatment technology is considered
innovative if it has had limited full-scale application. Often, it is the
application of a technology or process to soils, sediments, sludge, and
solid-matrix waste (such as mining slag) that is innovative. Ground
water treatment after the water has been pumped to the surface often
resembles traditional water treatment technologies; thus, in general,
pump-and-treat remedies are considered established. In situ
bioremediation of ground water, however, is considered an innovative
technology.
This report documents the use of the following innovative treatment
technologies to treat soils, sediments, sludge, and solid-matrix waste;
Ex situ Bioremediation
In situ Bioremediation
Chemical treatment
Dechlorination
In situ flushing
* In situ vitrification
» Soil washing
• Solvent extraction
» Thermal desorption
• Vacuum extraction
In addition, the five sites using in-situ bioremediation for ground
water are included with the in situ bioremediation projects.
0
Sources of Infonnaiion for This Report
EPA initially used RODs to compile information on remedial actions,
and Pollution Reports, On-Scene Coordinators Reports, and the
OSWER Removal Tracking System to compile data on emergency
response actions. EPA then verified andupduted the draftinformation
by telephone interviews with remedial project managers (RPMs) and
on-scene coordinators (OSCs). The data concerning project status do
not duplicate data in CERCUS, EPA's Superfund tracking system.
This report provides more detailed information specifically on the
portion of the remedy pertaining to an innovative technology. In
addition, technologies and sites identified here may differ from
information found in the ROD annual reports and the RODs Data-
base, These differences are the result of design changes in the
treatment trains used at sites that may or may not require official
documentation (i.e., a ROD amendment or an Explanation of Sig-
nificant Differences),
-------
Increasing Use of Alternative and Innovative Treatment Technologies
ROD Statistics. Currently, there are 1,211 sites on or proposed for the
National Priorities list (NPL). Through FY90 ending September 30,
1990, 751 RODs had been signed describing the remedies to be used
to clean up 435 sites. Most RODs for remedial actions address the
source of contamination, such as soil, sludge, sediments, solid-type
wastes, and nonaqueous phase liquids (NAPL). These RODs are
referred to as "source control" RODs. Other RODs address ground
water only or specify that no action is necessary. Figure 1 shows the
number of source control RODs relative to the total number of RODs
for each fiscal year.
An analysis of source control RODs allows a comparison of the
frequency of selection of treatment versus containment or disposal to
remedy site contamination. Source control RODs are classified by the
FIGURE 1
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: RODS SIGNED BY FISCAL YEAR *
(Total = 751)
Number
Of 100 -
RODs
80
Total RODs
Source Control RODs
82
83
85 86
Fiscal Year
751 RODs corresponds to 435 NPL sites.
Source: USEPA Office of Emergency and Remedial Response.
90
-------
FIGURE 2
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: SOURCE CONTROL RODs BY
FISCAL YEAR*
(Total = 535)
140 -i
I I Trealmoit
I Containment, Disposal Only
Other (IrtSMtutional Controls,
Monitoring, Relocation)
Fiscal Year
* 535 RODs corresponds to 421NPL sites.
Source: USEPA Office of Emergency and Remedial Response.
FIGURE 3
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: OVERVIEW OF ALL SOURCE
CONTROL RODs THROUGH FY 90
Other* (6)1%
Containment or
Disposal Only
(215)40%
Some Treatment
(314) 59%
* Includes institutional controls, monitoring, and relocation.
( ) Number of Records of Decision (RODs) for source control,
S ourtt: USEPA Office of Emergency and Krmedial Response
general type of technology selected: (1) RODs specifying some
alternative treatment; (2) RODs specifying containment/disposal
only; (3) RODs specifying other action (such as land use restrictions,
monitoring, or relocation). Figure 2 shows the number of source
control RODs that fall under each category. RODs selecting some
treatment may include containment of treatment residuals or of waste
from another part of the site.
Overall, 59% of source control RODs have selected at least one
treatment technology for source control (Figure 3). The proportion
of source control RODs selecting some treatment for site wastes is
increasing (Figure 4), The increase becomes moredramatic in FY88,
a year after the passage of the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act (SARA) in late 1986. Fifty percent of RODs in
FY87 selected some treatment for source control, whereas 70% of
RODs in FY88 selected some treatment. SARA required that EPA
favor permanent remedies (that is, alternative treatment) over con-
tainment or disposal to remediate Superfund sites.
FIGURE 4
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: TREATMENT VERSUS
DISPOSAL RODs FOR SOURCE CONTROL
Percent I
RODs* 40
\
sf
\
s
>'\
V
1.
'h,
X
f
''Oh
^
''o.,
^
K
/-*
v.
,— •—
i G< t
— B
• a
82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
Fiscal Year
•*- Some Treatment
a • Containment, Containment & Disposal, or Off-Site Disposal
* RODs - Records of Decision
Source: USEPA Office of Emergency and Remedial Response.
-------
FIGURE 5
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES THROUGH FY 90*
Established Technologies (210) 60%
Off-site Incineration (55) 16%
Other "(10) 3%
Innovative Technologies (140) 40%
Soil Washing (16) 5%
Solvent Extraction (5) 2%
Ex situ Bioremediation (20) 5%
situ Bioremedialion '(11)3%
In situ Rushing (11) 3%
Vacuum Extraction (49) 13%
On-site Incineration (59) 17%
Solidification/Stabilization (86) 24%
Dechlorination (5) 2%
In situ Vitrification (5) 2%
*s»
Chemical Treatment (1) < 1 %
Thermal Desorption (17) 5%
* Data are derived from 1982 -1990 Records of Decision (RODs) and anticipated design and construction activities as of August 1991.
The 350 technologies are associated with 301 sites; the difference reflects the use of more than one technology per site.
( ) Number of time* this technology wgj selected or used.
0 "Other" technologies are soil aeration, in situ flaming, and chemical neutralization.
t Includes in situ groundwater ueatrnent
Technology Statistics. Another way of illustrating the greater use of
treatment is by quantifying the number and kinds of treatment
technologies selected and used. The remainder of the information
contained in this document focuses on technologies, not RODs. Each
ROD specifying treatment may have selected several alternative
treatment technologies.
Through FY90, 350 treatment technologies have been selected in
313 source control RODs for 301 sites. In addition, EPA has selected
in situ bioremediation of ground water for five sites. The selection
of multiple technologies results from the use of treatment trains or
from the treatment of different wastes or areas of the site. For the 313
RODs specifying treatment for source control, Figure 5 lists each type
of treatment technology selected and how often it has been selected or
used for source control. The five in situ groundwater remedies are
included in the totals for in situ bioremediation. Figure 5 illustrates
that, through FY90,40% of the 350 treatment technologies selected
were innovative and 60% were conventional. This report contains
summary information on the innovative treatment technology projects
and a list of sites using established technologies (Appendix A).
-------
REMEDIAL ACTIONS:
60
FIGURE 6
NUMBER OF ESTABLISHED VERSUS INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
Number of
Treatment
Technologies
Selected
82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89
nnn
Established Treatment
Technologies
Innovative Treatment
Technologies
90
The proportion of alternative treatment technologies selected that are
innovative increased dramatically between FY87 and 89. In FY9Q,
the number dropped slightly. This decrease is due, in part, to several
FY90 RODs where the technology is being reconsidered. Figure 6
compares the numbers of established and innovative technologies by
fiscal year.
Emergency Response Actions. Emergency response actions are
conducted in response to an immediate threat caused by a release of
hazardous substances. Emergency responses do not require RODs.
To date, innovative treatment has been used in relatively few emer-
gency response actions. The innovative technologies addressed in
this report have been used 18 times in 15 emergency response actions
(Figure 7). In addition, infrared incineration, no longer considered
innovative, was first used at two emergency response actions.
Many emergency responses involve small quantities of waste or
immediate threats requiring a quick action to alleviate the hazard.
Often, these types of activities do not lend themselves to on-site
treatment approaches. In addition, SARA does not contain the same
preference for innovative treatment for removals as it does for
remedial actions. As a result, the selection of innovative treatment for
removals has remained relatively constant—one to five selected per
year since FY84.
EPA would like to increase the use of innovative treatment methods
to address emergency response problems. One of the seven initiatives
contained in the EPA directive described in the foreword concerns
emergency response actions. It is expected that more innovative
technology will be used for the larger, and less time-critical emer-
gency responses in the future.
-------
FIGURE 7
EMERGENCY RESPONSES: SUMMARY OF INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES THROUGH AUGUST 1991*
(Total = 18)
Dechlorination (Liquids )(3) 17%
In Situ Vitrification (1) 5%
Chemical Treatment (4) 22%
Solvent Extraction (2) 11%
Vacuum Extraction (1) 5%
In Situ Flushing (1) 5%
Soil Washing (1) 5%
Ex Situ Bioremediation (3) 17%
In Situ Bioremediation (2) 11%
* Data from the OS WER Removal Tracking System, CERCLIS, and phone survey of regional TAT offices.
( ) Number of times this technology was selected or used.
Status of Innovative Technology Implementation
Many of the innovative technologies documented in this report have
been selected in the last several years. The design of these projects
typically takes one to three years; therefore, relatively few innovative
technologies have been contracted and installed, and even fewer have
been completed (Figure 8), In the next several years, though, many
projects now in design should become operational.
Summary of Updates to Last Report
As noted earlier, this September 1991 report adds remedial sites
where innovative technologies were selected in FY90 RODs. The use
of innovative technologies at 15 emergency response sites is also
documented. An appendix (Appendix A) has been added that lists
remedial sites for which established technologies (for example,
incineration, solidification/stabilization) have been selected. The
information in the site/technology tables has been expanded to in-
clude information on treatability/pilot studies and design completion
dates, where appropriate. Other changes to the report include the
following:
« Based on Regional telephone interviews, several sites and tech-
nologies have been dropped from the report because the innova-
tive technologies of interest are being reconsidered or are no
longer a part of the site remedy. These sites are:
— Leetown Pesticide, PA—^Bioremediation
— Northwest Transformer, WA—In situ Vitrification
— Harvey Knott, DE—In situ Soil Flushing
-------
REMEDIAL ACTIONS: PROJECT
°
Technology .
Vacuum Extraction
Ex Situ Bioremediation
Thermal Desorption
Soil Washing
In Situ Bioremediation *
In Situ Flushing
In Situ Vitrification
Solvent Extraction
Dechlorination
Chemical Treatment
TOTAL
FIGURE 8
STATUS OF INNOVATION TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
Predesign/
In Design
36
15
14
16
8
9
5
4
3
0
110 (78%)
Design Complete/
Being Installed/
Operational
12
4
0
0
2
2
0
1
1
0
22 (16%)
Project
Completed
i
i
3
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
* (6%)
AS OF AUGUST 1991
Total
49
20
17 "
16
11
11
5
5
5
1
140
* Data derived from 1982 - 1990 Records of Decision ( RODs) and anticipated design and construction activities.
t Includes in situ groundwater
treatment.
• SMS Instruments, NY (Deer Park) is now listed under Vacuum * Bioremediation is divided into ex situ and in situ bioremediation.
Extraction instead of Thermal Desorption.
In addition, there are several noteworthy changes to innovative
« GE Wiring Services, PR is now listed under Soil Washing rather technologies that were documented in FY90 RODs:
than Chemical Extraction because the selected technology is water
based. It should be noted however, that this technology is being
reconsidered for this site.
Hardage/Criner, OK; The vacuum extraction remedy selected by
EPA was not included in the court judgment.
Dechlorination has been classified separately from Chemical
Treatment
Bofers Noble, MI: Thermal desorption is being reconsidered, and
is not included in this report.
-------
Contents of this Report ,
Cost and Performance Data
This report contains several summary lists of the Superfund sites for
which innovative treatment technologies have been selected or used.
Table 1 lists the sites by EPA Region. Table 2 lists the sites by the
general type of innovative treatment technology selected and gives
the project status.
Table 3 contains the detailed site-specific data on which the other
tables are based. It shows each site where an innovative treatment
technology has been selected and provides the site information
relevant to the application of that technology.
Lastly, Appendix A includes a list of NPL sites for which established
technologies have been selected for source control in RODs.
A major area of interest to TIO is the availability of cost and
performance information for the Superfund projects listed in this
report. This edition notes those sites for which treatability studies
have been performed, so that this information may become more
widely available. However, few innovative technologies have been
implemented, and only 19 have been completed (8 remedial projects
and 11 removals). Some treatability information is available through
the Alternative Treatment Technology Information Center (ATTIC).
To obtain access to this information, call (301) 670-6294. EPA is
gathering available information on completed projects, and this
information will become available later.
-------
TABLE 1
EPA REGIONAL SUMMARY FOR INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
Table 1 summarizes the innovative treatment technologies used at sites on the National Priorities List (NPL) and sites
where emergency response actions were conducted in each EPA region. As shown in this table, the frequency of use of
innovative technologies varies by region. Seven of EPA's ten regional offices have 10 or more applications of innovative
treatment technologies underway.
-------
EPA EEGIONAL SUMMIT FOR
TABLE 1
IHNOMTIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
September. 1W1
TECHNOLOGY
Vacuum Extraction
Ex situ Bioremediation
Solvent Extraction
Dechlorination
Thermal Dcsorption
Thermal Desorption
Vacuum Extraction
Vacuum Extraction
Solvent Extraction
Solvent Extraction
Thermal Desorption
Thermal Desorption
Vacuum Extraction
Vacuum Extraction
Vacuum Extraction
In situ Bioremediation
Dechlorination
In situ flushing
In situ Flushing
In situ Flushing
Soil Washing
SITE HANE
Region 1
Kellogg-Deering Well
Field
Iron Horse Park
Norwood PCBs
Re-Solve*
Cannon
Engineering/Bridsewater
Re-Solve*
Grove (and Uells
Wells GSH
O'Connor
Pirtette's Selvage Yard
McKin
Ottatf £ Goss
South Municipal Water
Supply Well
Tinkham Garage
Stamina Mills
Region 2
FAA Technical Center -
Area D (gw)*
Kyers Property*
Goose Farm
Lipari Landfill
Vineland Chemical*
Euan Property*
STATE
CT
MA
MA
HA
MA
MA
HA
MA
Mi
HE
ME
NH
NH
NH
RI
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
TECHNOLOGY
Soil Mashing
Soil Washing
Soil Washing
Solvent Extraction
Thermal Desorption
Thermal Desorption
Thermal Desorption
Thermal Desorption
Vacuum Extraction
Dechlorination
Oech lor {nation
In situ Flushing
Thermal Desorption
Thermal Desorption
Thermal Desorption
Thermal Desorption
Thermal Desorption
Vacuum Extraction
SITE NAME
Region 2 (continued)
King of Prussia
Myers Property*
Vineland Chemical*
Euan Property*
Caldwell Trucking
Meta 1 tee/Aerosystews
Reich Farms
Waldick Aerospace
Devices
FAA Technical Center*
Signo Trading/«t. Vernon
(Removal)
Wide Beach Development
Byron Barrel & Drum
American Thermostat
Claremont Polycheaiical
Fulton Terminals
Marathon iattery
Sarney Farm
SMS Instruments (Deer
STATE
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NT
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
Vacuum Extraction
Soil Washing
Vacuum Extraction.
Park)
Vestal Water Supply 1-1 NY
GE Wiring Devices PR
Upjohn Manufacturing Co, PR
* Indicates more than one technology selected in the same ROD.
11
-------
TABLE 1 (continued)
EPA REGIONAL SUMARY FOR INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
September, 1991
TECHNOLOGY
Vacuum Extraction
Vacuum Extraction
Vacuum Extraction
Vacuum Extraction
Ex situ Bioremediation
Chemical Treatment
In situ Flushing
In situ Flushing
Ex situ iioremediation
Ex situ Bioremediat ion
Ex situ Bioreroediation
Ex situ Bioremediation
Ex situ Bioremediation
in situ Bioremediation
Soil Washing
Soil Washing
Soil Washing
Solvent Extraction
Ex situ Bioremediation
SITE NAIE
Region 3
Bendix
Henderson Road
Lord-Shope Landfill
Tyson's Durcp
L.A. Clarke & Sons*
Avtex Fibers (Removal)
L.A. Clarke & Sons*
U.S. Titanium
Ordnance Works
Disposal
Region 4
American Creosote Works*
(Pensaeola)
Brown Wood Preserving
Coleman Evans Wood
Preserving*
Dubose Oil Products
Cabot/Koppers*
American Creosote Works*
(Pensacola)
Cabot/Koppers*
Coleman Evans Uood*
Preserving
General Refining (Removal)
Southeastern Wood
Preserving {Removal}*
STATE TECHNOLOGY
PA
PA
PA
PA
VA
VA
VA
VA
WV
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
Soil Washing
In situ Flushing
Soil Washing
Vacuum Extraction
Chemical Treatment
Vacuum Extraction
Thermal Oesorption
Vacuum Extraction •
EK situ Sioremediation
In situ Vitrification
Thermal Desorption
in situ B i oremed i at i on
In situ Flushing
Vacuum Extraction
) Vacuum Extraction
FL |
Vacuun Extraction
FL
Vacuum Extraction
GA ; Ex situ Bioremediation
j
MS In situ Bioremediation
j Chemical Treatment
SITE NAME
Region 4 (continued)
Southeastern Wood
Preserving (Removal)*
Jadco- Hughes
Cape Fear Uood
Preserving
Jadco* Hughes
Palmetto Uood
Preserving
H ins on Chemical (Removal )
Uamchem
SCRDI Bluff Road
Region 5
Galesburg/Koppers
Sangamo/Crab Orchard Hat ' I
Wildlife Refuge
Outboard Marine/
Uaukcgan Harbor
Seymour Recycling*
Ninth Avenue Dump
Fisher Calo Chem
MIDCO I
Seymoyr Recycling*
Wayne Waste Reclamation
CLiff/Dow Dump (soil)
Cliff/Dow Dump <§*/soil)
PBM Enterprises (Removal)
STATE
MS
NC
NC
NC
SC
SC
SC
SC
IL
IL
a
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
IN
HI
HI
MI
* Indicates more than one technology selected in the same ROD.
12
-------
TABLE 1 (continued)
EPA REGIONAL StMMKY FOR INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
September. 1991
TECHNOLOGY
SITE
STATE
TECHNOLOGY
SITE
In situ Flushing
In situ Vitrification
In situ Vitrification
In situ Vitrification
Vacuum Extraction
Vacuun Extraction
Vacuum Extraction
Ex situ Bio remedial ion
Ex situ Bi or mediation
Thermal Desorption
Vacuum Extraction
Soil Washing
Vacuun (Extraction
Vacuum Extraction
Ex situ Bioremediation
In situ Bi oretDediation
Soil Washing
Vacuum Extraction
Vacuum Extraction
Soil Washing
geai on 5 (continued)
U.S. Aviex
Anderson Development
Ionia City Landfill
Parsons Chemical (Removal)
Kysor Industrial
Springfield Township Dump
Verona Welt Field
Burlington northern
(Railroad Tie Treating
Plant)
Joslyn Manufacturing
£ Supply Co.
University of Minnesota
Long Prairie
United Scrap lead/Si A
Miami County
Incinerator
Pristine (Amendment)
Moss- American*
Onalaska Municipal
Landfill
Moss-American*
Hagen' Farm
Wausau Grounduater
Contamination
Region 6
Arkwood
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
NI
Mi
MN
MN
MN
MN
OH
OH
OH
ill
WI
WI
WI
WI
AR
Ex situ Bioremediation
Ex situ Bioremediation
In situ Bioremediation
Dechlorination
Vacuun Extraction
Oechlorination
Solvent Extraction
Vacuum Extraction
Ex situ Bioremediation
Ex situ Bioremediation
In situ Bioremediation
Solvent Extraction
Dechlorinatfon
In situ Flushing
In situ Vitrification
Soil Washing
Soil Washing
Ex situ Bioremediation
Ex situ Bioremediation
Deehlorination
Vacuum Extraction
Region 6 (continued)
Old Inger Oil Refinery
AT&SF/Clovis
AT&SF/Clovis
Fruitland Drum (Removal)
South Valley/Edmunds
Tenth Street
Traband Warehouse (Removal)
Tinker AFB
North Cavalcade Street
Sheridan Disposal
Services
French Limited
United Creosoting
Sol Lynn/ Industrial
Transformers
South Cavalcade Street*
Crystal Chemical
Koppers/Texarkana
South Cavalcade Street*
Region 7
Vogel Paint & Wax
Scott Lumber (Removal)
Crown Plating (Removal)
Hastings Grounduater
Contamination * Wett #3
LA
NM
NM
NM
NM
OK
OK
OK
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
TX
IX
TX
TX
IA
MO
MO
NE
* Indicates more than one technology selected in the same ROD.
13
-------
TABLE 1 (continued)
EPA REGIONAL SUMART FOB INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
September, 1991
TECHNOLOGY
SITE KAfC
STATE
TECHKOLOGT
SITE NAME
STATE
Vacuum Extraction
Vacuun Extraction
Vacuum Extraction
Vacuum Extraction
In situ Vitrification
Soil Washing
Thermal Desorption
Vacuun Extraction
Vacuum Extraction
Vacuum Extraction
Ex situ Bioremediation
Ex situ Bioremediation
In situ Bioremediation
In situ Bioremediation
Chemical Treatment
Region 7 (continued)
Hastings Groundwater
Contamination - Colorado Ave.
Hastings Groundwater
Contamination - Far Marco
Lindsay Manufacturing
Waver I y Groundwater
Contamination
Region 8
Rocky Mountain Arsenal
(OU16)
Sand Creek Industrial (OU5)
Martin Marietta
(Denver Aerospace)*
Martin Marietta
(Denver Aerospace)*
Rocky Mountain Arsenal
(OU18)
Sand Creek Industrial (OU1)
Burlington Northern
(Somers Plant) (soil)
Libby Ground Water
Contamination (soil)
Burlington Northern
(Somers Plant) (gw)
Libby Ground Water
Contamination (gu)
Regjorrg
Gila River Indian Reservation
(Removal)*
NE
NE
NE
NE
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
MT
MT
MT
MT
AZ
Chemical Treatment
In situ Bioremediation
Vacuun Extraction
Vacuum Extraction
Ex situ Bioremediation
In situ Bioremediation
In sity Bioremediation
In sity Bioremediation
Soil Washing
Vacuum Extraction
Vacuum Extraction
Vacuun Extraction
Vacuun Extraction
Vacuum Extraction
Vacuun Extraction
Vacuun Extraction
Vacuun Extraction
Vacuum Extraction
Ex situ Bioremediation
In situ Flushing
In situ Flushing
Region 9 (continued)
Stanford Pesticide #1
(Removal)
Gila River Indian
Reservation (Removal)*
Motorola 52nd Street
Phoen i x • Goody e a r
Airport Area
J.H. Baxter
Rose villa Drums (Removal)
Coppers (Oroville
Plant)*
Solvent Service (gw)*
Koppers (OroviUe
Plant)*
Fairchi Id
Semi conductor/MTV- 1
Fairchi Id
Semi conductor /MTV- 1 !
FairchHd Semiconductor
(Sen Jose)
IBM (San Jose)
Intel, Mountain View
Intersil /Siemens
Raytheon, Mountain View
Solvent Service*
Watkins- Johnson
Poly-Carb (Removal)*
Poly-Carb (Removal)*
Region 10
United Chrome Products
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
NV
MV
OR
* Indicates more than one technology selected in the same ROD.
14
-------
TABLE 2
PROJECT STATUS SUMMARY BY INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Table 2 lists the applications of innovative treatment technologies at NPL and removal sites by technology and
summarizes the status of the specific technology application. The symbols used in this table are:
0
PD - In predesign. A site may be considered in predesign if EPA is negotiating the consent decree for the
design with the responsible party, the lead agency is preparing the predesign report, the lead agency
is contracting for the design firm, or the lead agency is conducting a treatability study or field
investigation before beginning actual design work.
D - In design. A site is considered in design after the design contractor has begun work,
D/I - This symbol is used if the design work has been completed but installation work has not yet begun
when this report is published.
I - Being installed. An innovative treatment technology is "being installed" after the construction contract
has been awarded and before the treatment system has begun operation. For some technologies, this
is a relatively short phase of the project because they are assembled on site quickly. For other
technologies, the period of installation lasts several construction seasons.
O - Operational. A treatment technology is operational once it is constructed and has been proven to
be functional. The length of time required to complete the operation phase depends on such factors
as the nature of the technology, the quantity of material to be treated, and the concentration of the
contaminants at the start of treatment.
C - Completed. A treatment technology project is considered complete when the operation of the
treatment technology ceases. Other site activities may still be planned or ongoing.
15
-------
PROJECT
B10KEDIATIOM (EX SITU)
Iron Horse Park, HA, 01
L.A. Clarke & Sons, VA, 03
Ordnance Uorks Disposal, UV, 03
American Creosote Uorks, FL, 04
(Pensacola)
Brown Hood Preserving, FL, 04
Coleman Evans Wood Preserving, FL, 04
Dubose 0)1 Products, FL, 04
Southeastern Wood Preserving (Removal), MS, 04
Burlington Northern, MN, OS
(Railroad Tie Treating Plant)
Cliff/Don Dump, MI, 05
Galesburg/Koppers, IL, 05
Joslyn Manufacturing and Supply Company, MN, 05
Moss-American, VI, 05
Old Inger Oil Refinery, LA, 06
AT&SF/Clovis, NM, 06
North Cavalcade Street, TX, 06
Sheridan Disposal Services, TX, 06
Vogel Paint & Max, IA, 0?
Scott Lumber, MO, 0?
Burlington Northern (Somers Plant), MT, 08
Libby Ground Water Contamination, MT, OS
J. H. Baxter, CA, 09
Poly-Carb (Removal), NV, 09
FAA Technical Center, NJ, 02
Cabot/Koppers, FL, 04
TABLE 2
STATUS SUMMARY BY INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
STATUS
D
0
0
D
C
D
PD
0
0
PO
PD
0
PD
1
D
D
PO
D
0
0
0
D
C
D
0
17
tlM SITU)
Cliff/Doy Dump, MI, 05
Onalaska Municipal Landfill, Ml, 05
Seymour Recycling, IN, 05
AT&SF/Clovis, NM, 06
French Limited, TX, 06
Burlington Northern {Somers Plant), MT, 08
Libby Ground Water Contamination, MT, 08
Gila River Indian Reservation (Removal), AZ, 09
(Coppers (OroviUe Plant), CA, 09
RoseviUe Drums (Removal), CA, 09
Solvent Service, CA, 09
September. 1991
STATUS
PO
D
C
1
0
0
D
C
0
C
0
CHEMICAL TREATMENT
Avtex Fibers (Removal), V«, 05
Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC, 04
PBM Enterprises (Removal), MI, 05
Gila River Indian Reservation (Removal), AZ, 09
Stanford Pesticide #1 (Removal)
DECHLOR1NAT10M
Re-Solve, MA, 01
Myers Property, NJ, 02
Signo Trading/Ml. Vernon (Removal), NY, 02
Wide Beach Development, NY, 02
Fruitland Drum (Removal), NM, 06
Sol Lynn/Industrial, TX, 06
Transformers
STATUS
C
C
C
C
C
STATUS
PD
PD
C
C
PD
I/O
-------
TABLE 2 (continued)
PROJECT STATUS SUMMARY BY INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Septafcer, 1991
PECHLORINAT10M (continued)
Wildlife Refuge, IL, 05
Crystal Chemical, TX, 06
Rocky Mountain Arsenal, (OU16), CO, 08
STATUS
Tenth Street, OK, 06
Crown Plating (Removal), HO, 07
IN SITU FLUSHING
Byron Barrel & Drum, NY, 02
Goose Farm, NJ, 02
Lipari Landfill, NJ, 02
Vineland Chemical, NJ, 02
L.A. Clarke & Sons, VA, 03
U.S. Titanium, VA, 03
Jadco- Hughes, NC, 04
Ninth Avenue Dump, IN, 05
U.S. Aviex, HI, 05
South Cavalcade Street, TX, 06 .
Poly-Carb (Removal), NV, 09
United Chrome Products, 08, 10
III SITU VITRIFICATIDN
Anderson Development, Ml, 05
Ionia City Landfill, MI, 05
Parsons Chemical (Removal), MI, 05
Sangamo/Crab Orchard Nat 'I
D
C
STATUS
D
D
I
PD
D
PD
D
D
D
0
C
0
STATUS
PD
D
I
PD
PO
D
SOIL WASH 1KG
iwan Property, NJ, 02
GE Wiring Devices, PR, 02
King of Prussia, NJ, 02
Myers Propery, NJ, 02
Vineland Chemical, NJ, 02
Cabot/Koppers, FL, 04
Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC, 04
American Creosote Works, FL, 04
Coteman-Evans Wood Preserving, FL, 04
Southeastern Wood Preserving (Removal}, MS, 04
Moss-American, MI, 05
United Scrap Lead/SIA, OH, 05
Arkwood, AR, 06
Koppers/Texarkana, TX, 06
South Cavalcade Street, TX, 06
Sand Creek Industrial (OU5), CO, 08
(Coppers (Oroville Plant), CA, 09
SOLVENT EXTRACTION
Norwood PCBS, MA, 01
O'Connor, ME, 01
Pinette's Salvage Yard, HE, 01
Euan Property, NJ, 02
General Refining (Removal), GA, 04
Traband Warehouse (Removal), OK, 06
united Creosoting, TX, 06
STATUS
PD
PD
PD
PO
PO
D
D
D
D
0
PD
D
PD
PD
0
D
D
STATUS
PO
D
D/I
PO
C
C
D
t8
-------
TABLE 2 (continued)
PROJECT STATUS StMUKY BY INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
THERMAL DESO8PTIOM
Cannon Eniineering/Bridgewater, HA, 01
MeKin, HE, 01
Ottati & Goss, NH, 01
Re-Solve, HA, 01
American Thermostat, NY, 02
Caldwell Trucking, NJ, 02
Claremont Polychemical, MY, 02
Fulton Terminals, NY, 02
Marathon Battery, NY, 02
Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ, 02
Reich Farms, NJ, 02
Sarney Farm, NY, 02
Ualdick Aerospace Devices, NJ, 02
Uamchem, SC, 04
Outboard Mari ne/Waukcgan
Harbor, IL, 05
University of Minnesota, HN, 05
Martin Marietta, CO, 08
' VACUUM EXTRACTION
Groveland Nells, MA, 01
Kellogg-Deering Well, CT, 01
Field
South Municipal Water, NH, 01
Supply Well
Stamina Mills, Rl, 01
Tinkham Garage, NH, 01
yells G&K, HA, 01 '
STATUS
C
C
c
PD
D
D
D
PD
PD
D
0
PD
D
D
D
D
PD
!
STATUS |
D
D
D
PD
D
D
VACUUM EXTRACTION (continued)
FAA Technical Center, NJ, 02
SMS Instruments (Deer Park), NY, 02
Upjohn Manufacturing Co., PR, 02
Vestal Water Supply 1-1, NY, 02
Sendix, PA, 03
Henderson Road, PA, 03
lord-Shope Landfill, PA, 03
Tyson's Dump, PA, 03
Hinson Chemical (Removal), SC, 04
Jadco-Hughes, NC, 04
SCRDl Bluff Road, SC, 04
Fisher Calo Chem, IN, 05
Hagen Farm, WI, 05
Kysor Industrial, HI, 05
Long Prairie, MN, 05
MIDCO I, IN, 05
Miami County Incinerator, OH, 05
Pristine (Amendment), OH, 05
Seymour Recycling, IN, 05
Springfield Township Dump, MI, 05
Verona Well Field, MI, 05
Uausau Groundwater
Contamination, WI, 05
Wayne Waste Reclamation, IN, 05
South Valley/Edmunds, NM, 06
Tinker AFS, OK, 06
, 1991
STATUS
D
D/I
C
PD
D
D
PD
0
0
D
PD
PD
D
D
D/I
PD
PD
PD
0
PD
0
D
PD
D
PO
19
-------
VACUUM EXTRACTION (continued)
Hastings Groundwater Contamination,
Colorado Ave., NE, 07
Hastings Groundwater Contamination,
Far-Marco, HE, 07
Hastings Groundwater Contamination,
Welt No. 3, NE, 07
Lindsay Manufacturing, HE, 07
tfaverly Groundwater Contamination, NE, 07
Martin Marietta, CO, 08
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OJ18), CO, 08
Sand Creek Industrial (OU1), CO, OB
Motorola 52nd Street, AZ, 09
Phoenix-Goodyear Airport, AZ, 09
Area
Fairchild Semiconductor, CA, 09
(San Jose)
Fairchild Semi conductor/MTV-1, CA, 09
Fairchild Semiconductor/MTV-II, CA, 09
IBM (San Jose), CA, 09
Intel, Mountain View, CA, 09
Intersil/Siemens, CA, 09
Raytheon, Mountain View, CA, 09
Solvent Service, CA, 09
Uatkins-Johnson, CA, 09
TABLE 2 {continued)
PROJECT STATUS SUMMIT BY INNOVATIVE TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
STATUS
D
D
D
PD
0
PO
0/1
D/I
D
0
0
D
I
D
0
0
0
PO
Septe*>er, 1991
20
-------
TABLES
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Table 3 is the principal part of this document. It contains the most detailed, site-specific information for sites where
innovative treatment has been selected. The columns of Table 3 present the following information:
Site Name, State, Region, ROD Date
This column identifies the site and the operable unit for which innovative treatment was selected.
A Record of Decision (ROD) documents the selection of remedy in the remedial program. The date shown in this
column is the date a ROD was signed by an EPA official.
An asterisk in this column indicates that a treatability study has been completed for this technology at this site.
Specific Technology
The second column describes the specific type of technology selected within a general category of innovative treatment.
For example, within the general category of bioremediation, the specific technologies of land treatment or slurry-phase
bioremediation may be chosen.
Site Description
This column provides information on the industrial source of the contamination at the site and allows analysis of the
selection of innovative technologies by site type. For example, by using the information in this column, one may
determine the most frequently selected innovative technology for wood preserving sites.
21
-------
Media (quantity)
This column provides information on the media and quantity of material to be treated. If a treatment is used in situ,
an effort was made to include the maximum depth of the treatment to provide the reader with another important
parameter regarding the application,
Key Contaminants Treated
The major contaminants or contaminant groups targeted by the treatment technology are shown in this column. There
may be other contaminants as well that will be treated. Other contaminants that may be present, but are not being
addressed by the listed technology, are not included.
Status
This column gives the status of the application of the innovative treatment technology. Predesign indicates that the
ROD has been signed but design has not begun. During predesign, EPA may be negotiating with the potentially
responsible parties, procuring the services of a design firm, or collecting information (such as a treatability study) needed
in the design stage. If a project is in design, the engineering documents needed to contract and build the remedy are
being prepared. If a remedy is being installed, the lead agency has signed a contract for the construction work needed
to set up the remedy. The remedy is operational if it is constructed and is now being operated as a treatment system
and it is completed if the goals of the ROD for that treatment technology have been met and treatment ceases.
Lead Agency, Treatment Contractor
The "lead" indicates whether federal dollars are to be used to implement the remedy (Fund lead) or the potentially
responsible parties will conduct the remedy with EPA/State oversight (PRP lead). If a remedy is Fund lead, EPA may
manage the design/construction through its contractors, the Stale may manage the project with Superfund dollars or the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) may act for EPA to manage the design or construction. Whichever agency
or organization is responsible for managing the remedy, the contractor responsible for the actual installation and
operation of the innovative technology is also identified if the lead agency has selected one.
22
-------
Contacts/Phone
This final column gives the names and telephone numbers of useful contacts for the site or technology. The first name
is usually the EPA Remedial Project Manager (RPM) (for remedial actions) or On-Scene Coordinator (OSC) (for
emergency response actions) responsible for the site. If a remedy is being managed by the State, the name and phone
number of the State RPM is also provided. Information on any other useful contacts is provided.
23
-------
-------
TABLE 3
DETAILED SITE INFORMATION BY TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Septofcer, 1991
Region
1
3
3
4
4
4
4
Site Name, State,
Region (ROD Date)
»
Iron Horse Park, MA*
(09/11/88)
L.A. Clarke & Sons, VA*
(03/31/88)
Also see In situ
Flushing
Ordnance Works
Disposal, WV (09/29/89)
American Creosote
yorks, FL* (09/28/89)
Also see Soil Hashing
Brown Wood
Preserving, FL*
(04/08/88)
Colenan Evans Wood
Preserving, FL*
(9/26/90)
Also see Soil Washing
Dubose Oil Products, FL
(03/2f/fO)
Specific
Technology
Land treatment
On-site
bioremediation -
type to be
determined
Land treatment
Slurry-phase
bioremediation for
fines from soil
washing
Land treatment
Slurry-phase
bioremediation of
fines from soil
washing
Solid-phase
bioremediation
Site
Description 1
Industrial
Complex &
Rai I yard
Hastes
Wood
Preserving
Chemical
Formulation
Wood
Preserving
Wood
Preserving
Wood
Preserving
Oil Recycling
Media
(Quantity)
Sludge, Soil
(28,000 cy
combined)
Soil {73,700
cy). Sediments
(45,300 cy)
Soil (13,460
cy)
Fines from
21,000 cy of
soil
Soil (7,500
cy)
Fines from
27,000 cy of
soil
Soil (15,000
cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Petroleum Hydrocarbons,
VOCs (BTEX), and PAHs
Creosote, PAHs, and VOCs
(Benzene)
Carcinogenic PAKs
Creosote, PAHs, SVOCs
(PCP), and Dioxins
Creosote and PAHs
SVOCs
-------
Table 3 {continued}
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
Septafccr, 1991
Region
4
5
5
5
5
5
Site Name, State,
Region (ROD Date)
Southeastern Wood
Preserving, MS
(Emergency Response
-AM signed 9/30/90)
Also see Soil Washing
Burlington Northern
(Railroad Tie Treating
Plant}, KM*
(06/04/86)
Cliff/Dot* Dump, MI*
(09/27/89)
Also see Bioremediation
(In situ)
Golesburg/Koppers, 1L
(06/30/89)
Joslyn Manufacturing
and Supply Co. , MN
(ROD Planned)
Moss-American, Wl
(09/27/90)
s
Also see Soil Washing
Specific
Technology
Slurry-phase
bioremediation of
fines from soil
washing
Land treatment
Excavation/on-site
bioremediation *
type to be
determined
Land treatment
Land treatment
Slurry- phase of
fines from soil
washing and
sediments
Site
Description
Wood
Preserving
Wood
Preserving
Waste Disposal
for Charcoal
Manufacturing
Plant
Wood
Preserving
Wood
Preserving
Wood
Preserving
Media
(Quantity)
4,000 cy of
fines from
soil washing
Soil (9,500
cy). Sludge
(9,600 cy)
Soil (9,200
cy)
Soil (15,200
cy>
Soil (75,000
cy)
Sediments
(5,200 cy).
Fines from
soil (80,000
ey)
Key Contaminants
Treated
SVOCs (PCP), PAHs, and
Creosote
Creosote, PAHs, and
SVOCs (Phenols)
Tar, PAHs, VOCs (BTX and
PCE), and SVOCs (Phenol)
Creosote, PAH, Phenols,
and PCP
PftHs and SVOCs {PCP 3
PAHs
Status
Project
Ongoing;
Demonstration
on 700 cy 2/91
- 8/91; Full-
scale cleanup
began 8/91
Operational;
Expected
completion
1993
Predesign
Predesign
Operational
since 8/89;
scheduled
completion end
of 1991
Predesign;
Design
completion
planned
winter '93
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Fund Lead
OHM Remediation
Services Corp.
PRP Lead;
Remediation
Technologies, Inc.
PRP Lead
PRP Lead/State
Enforcement;
Remediation
Technologies, Inc.
PRP Lead/State
Enforcement; ECOVA
Corp.
PRP Lead;
Weston, Inc.
Contacts/
Phone
Don Rieger
404-347-3931
FTS 257-3931
Amy 8 1 umber g
312-353-9306
FTS 886-9306
Todd Goeks (MN)
612-296-7710
Rich Truax
(«etec)
303-493-3700
Lida Tan
312-886-1842
FTS 886-1842
Brad Bradley
312-886-4742
FTS 886-4742
Steve Davis (ID
217-785-3913
Kevin Turner
312-886-4444
FTS 886-4444
Cliff Twaroski
-------
Table 3 (continued)
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
September, 1991
Region 1
6
6
6
6
7
7
8
Site Name, State,
Region (ROD Date)
Old Inger Oil Refinery,
LA* (09/25/84)
Atchison/Santa Fe/
CLovis, NH
(09/23/88)
Also see Bioretnediation
(In situ)
North Cavalcade Street,
TX* (06/28/88)
Sheridan Disposal
Services, TX*
(12/29/88)
Vogel Paint & Wax, IA*
(09/25/89)
Scott Lumber, MO
(Emergency Response
-AM signed 7/10/87)
Burlington Northern
(Somers Plant), MT*
(09/27/89)
Also see Bioremediation
(In situ)
Spec i f i c
Technology
Land treatment
Land treatment of
soils/sludge
Modified land
treatment
Slurry- phase
bio remediation
Land treatment
Land treatment
Land treatment
Site
Description
Oil Refining &
Waste Oi I
Reclamation
Railyard
Wastes
(Industrial
Wastewater)
Wood
Preserving
Commercial
Waste Disposal
Paint
Manufacturing
Wastes
Wood
preserving
Wood
Preserving
Media
(Cuant i ty)
Soil (approx.
100,000 cy),
Waste oil and
sludge (3,964
cy combined)
Soil, Sludges
(28,599 cy
combined)
Soil (22,300
cy)
Soil (13,000
cy), Sludge
(31,000 cy),
Oil/enulsion
(300 cy)
Soil (10,000 -
40,000 cy)
Soil (16,000
tons)
Soil,
Sediments
(11,700 cy
combined)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Petroleum Hydrocarbons
and VOCs (Benzene,
Ethylbenzene),
Phenols, Petroleum
Hydrocarbons, and Diesel
Fuel
Creosote, PAHs, and VOCs
CBTX)
VOCs (Benzene, Toluene)
and SVOCs (Phenols)
VOCs (Methyl Ethyl
Ketone and BTX)
PAHs and Benzo(a)pyrene
Creosote, PAHs, and
SVOCs (Phenols)
Status
Installation
underway;
operation to
be bid Winter
101/193
In design;
Design
completion
planned Spring
•92
In design;
Design
completion
planned fall
•92
P redesign;
pilot study
underway;
design
completion
planned Sunnier
'93
In design;
Design
completion
planned S turner
'91
Ongoing;
Process
started in
1987
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
• 92
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
State Lead/Fund
Financed;
Westinghouse
Haztech
(Construction)
PRP Lead; Radian
Corp.
State Lead/ Fund
Financed
PRP Lead
PRP Lead/
State Enforcement;
Geoteck Engineering
and Testing
Services, Inc.
Fund Lead;
Remediation
Technologies, Inc.
PRP Lead;
Remediation
Technologies, Inc.
Contacts/
Phone
Paul Sieminski
214-655-6710
FTS 255-6710
Sandra Greenwich
(LA)
504-765-0487
Susan Webster
214-655-6730
FTS 255-6730
Deborah Grisuold
214-655-6715
FTS 255-6715
Lewis Rogers (TX)
512-463-8188
Ruth Israeli
214-655-6735
FTS 255-6735
Steve Jones
913-551-7755
FTS 276-7755
Bob Drustrup (IA)
515-281-8900
Bruce Morrison
913-551-5014
FTS 276-5014
Jim Harris
406-449-5414
FTS 585-5414
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
27
-------
Table 3 (continued)
Bioremediation (Ex situ)
September, 1991
Region
8
9
9
Site Name, State,
Region (ROD Date)
Libby Ground Water
Contamination, HI*
(12/30/88)
Also see lioremediation
(In situ)
J.H. Baxter, CA*
(09/27/90)
Poly-Carb, NV
(Emergency Response
-AM signed 5/14/87}
Also see In situ
Flushing
Specific
Technology
Land treatment
Solid-phase
biorecnediation
land treatment in
conjunction with
soil flushing
Site
Description
Mood
Preserving
Wood
Preserving
Commercial
Waste
Management
Media
(Quantity)
Soil {45,000
ey)
Soil (10,000
cy)
Soil (1,500
cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Creosote, SVOCs (PCP),
VOCs (Semene), and PAHs
SVOCs (PCP), PAHs, and
Dioxins
Phenols and Cresol
Status
Operational;
2-year, 1-acre
demonstration
completed
8/89,- full-
scale
treatment to
be completed
in 1999
In design;
Design
completion
planned Sumer
•92
Process
completed;
Operational
7/87 - 8/88
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP Lead
Fund Lead
Fund Lead;
Crosby and Overton,
EMI (subcontractors
to Reidel
Environmental
Services)
Contacts/
Phone
Julie Dalsoglio
406-449-5414
FTS 585-5414
Bert Bledsoe
(RSKERL)
405-332-2313
FTS 743-2313
Mary Masters
415-744-2370
FTS 484-2370
Bob Handel
415-744-2290
FTS 484-2290
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
28
-------
Table 3 (continued)
Btoremediation (In situ)
Septober, 1991
Region
2
4
5
5
5
6
Site Name, State,
Region (ROD Date)
FAA Technical Center,
NJ - Area D
(09/26/89)
Also see Vacuum
Extraction
Cabot /Koppers, FL
(09/27/90)
Also see Soil Hashing
Ci iff/Don Dump, MI*
{09/27/89}
Also see Btoremediation
(Ex situ)
Onalaska Municipal
Landfill, UI
(08/14/90)
Seymour Recycling, IN*
(09/30/87)
Also see Vacuum
Extraction
Atchi son/Santa Fe/
Clovis, NM
(09/23/88)
Also see Bioremediation
(Ex situ)
Specific
Technology
In situ gw
bioremediation
(Area D only)
In situ so! I
bioremediation
In situ soil and gw
bioremediation
In situ soil
bioremediation
In situ soil
bioremediation
In situ soil
bioremediation
Site
Description
Jet Fuel Tank
Farm
Wood treating
and pine tar
distillation
facility
Waste Disposal
for Charcoal
Manufacturing
Plant
Municipal
Landfill
Chemical Waste
Management and
Incineration
Ratlyard
Wastes
(Industrial
Uastewater)
Media
(Ouantity)
gw
Soil (5,000
cy)
gw, soi I
Soil (=20,000
cy; to 15'
depth}
Soil
Soil, Sludges
(28,599 cy
combined)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (BTEX)
SVOCs [Bis(2-ethyl-
hexyDphthalate, 2,4-
Dimethylphenol, 2,4-
Oinitrotoluene, Di-n-
octylphthalate, Penta-
chlorophenol. Phenol],
PAHs
VOCs (BTX), PAHs, and
SVOCs (Phenols)
VOCS (TCE, BTEX, DCE,
TCA, OCA) and SVOCs
(naphthalene)
Petroleum Hydrocarbons,
BTEX, and various SVOCs
Phenols, Petroleum
Hydrocarbons, and Diesel
Fuel
Status
In design;
Design
completion
planned 9/91
In design;
Treatability
study planned
Design
completion
planned Spring
•93
P redesign
In design;
bench study
planned Fall
'91; design
completion
planned Sunnier
'92
Remedial
action
completed
(small
component of
total remedy)
Construction
underway;
startup
planned Oct.
•91.
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP lead
PRP Lead
PRP Lead
Fund Lead
PRP Lead; ABB
Environmental
Services
(subcontractor to
Geraghty & Miller)
PRP Lead; Radian
Corp.
Contacts/
Phone
Carla Struble
212-264-4595
FTS 264-4595
Keith Buch (FAA)
609-484-6644
Martha Berry
404-347-2643
FTS-257-2643
lida Tan
312-886-1842
FTS 886-1842
Kevin Adler
312-886-7078
FTS 886-7078
Jeff Gore
312-886-6552
FTS 886-6552
Susan Webster
214-655-6730
FTS 255-6730
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Note; Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
29
-------
Table 3 (continued)
Bioremediation (In situ)
September, 1991
Region
6
8
8
9
9
9
9
Site Name, State,
Region (ROD Date)
French Limited, TX
(03/24/88}
Burlington Northern
(Somers Plant), «T*
(09/27/895
Libby Ground Water
Contamination, NT*
(12/30/885
Gi la River Indian
Reservation, AZ
(Emergency Response
-AH signed 7/31/845
Also see Chemical
Treatment
Koppers (Oroville
Plant 5, CA
(09/13/89)
Also see Soil Washing
Roseville Drums, CA
(Emergency Response
-AH s lined 3/3/885
Solvent Service, CA
(09/27/905
Also see Vacuum
Extraction
Specific
Technology
In situ lagoon
bioremediation
In situ gw
bioremediation
In situ gw
bio remediation
In situ anaerobic
soil biodegradation
(preceded by
chemical treatments
In situ soil
bioremediation
In situ soil
bioremediation
In situ gu
bi oremedi at i on
Site
Description
Petrochemical
Wood
Preserving
Mood
Preserving
Airfield with
buried drums
of pesticides
Wood
Preserving
Midnight dump
on dirt road
in undeveloped
area
Solvent
operation
Media
(Quantity)
Sludge,
Sediments
(70,100 cy>
gu
i
ft*
Soil (3,200
cy)
Soil (110,000
cy)
Soil (14 cy5
gw
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (BTEX), PAHS,
Petroleum Hydrocarbons,
and PCBs
Creosote, PAHs, and
SVOCs (Phenol 5
Creosote, VOCs
(Benzene), PAHs, SVOCs
(PCP5, and Oil
Toxaphene
SVOCs (PCP), Creosote,
PAHs, VOCs (BTX), Dioxin
Oichlorobeniene and
Phenols
VOCs (Total, Acetone,
Ethyl benzenes, TCA, and
Xylenes) and SVOCs
(Dichlorobenzene)
Status
In design
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
'92
In design;
Phase 1 design
completion
planned Sunnier
'91; Phase 2
design
completion
planned Spring
•93
Project
completed;
Operational
6/85 - 10/85
In design;
Design
completion
planned Sunnier
•92
Project
completed;
Operational
2/88 - 11/88
Operational
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP Lead
PRP Lead;
Remediation
Technologies, Inc.
PRP Lead
Fund Lead
PRP Lead
fund Lead
State Lead site
under RCRA authority
Contacts/
Phone
Judith Black
214-655-6735
FTS 255-6735
Jim Harris
406-449-5414
FTS 585-5414
Julie Dalsoglio
406-449-5414
FTS 585-5414
Bert Bledsoe
(RSKERL)
405-332-2313
FTS 743-2313
Richard Martin
414-744-2288
FTS 484-2288
Fred Sehauffler
415-744-2365
FTS 484-2365
Brad Shipley
415-744-2287
FTS 484-2287
Marie Lacey
415-744-2234
FTS 484-2234
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
30
-------
Table 3 (Continued)
September, 1991
Chemical Treatment
Region
3
4
5
9
9
Site Name, State,
Region (ROD Date)
ftvtex Fibers, VA
(Emergency Response
-AH signed 11/14/89)
Palmetto Wood
Preserving, SC*
(09/30/87)
PBM Enterprises (Van
Ousen Airport Service),
MI (Emergency Response
-AM Signed 4/10/88)
Gi La River Indian
Reservation, AZ
( Emergency Response
-AM signed 7/31/845
Stanford Pesticide #1,
AZ (Emergency Response
-AH signed 4/20/87}
Specific
Technology
Chemical Treatment
Reduction of Cr(VI)
to Cr(lll)
(Followed by
Solidification)
Chemical Oxidation
with Sodium
Hypochorite
In situ Chemical
Treatment using
sodium hydroxide
In situ Chemical
Treatment using
soda ash and
activated carbon
Site
Description
Rayon
manufacturing
facility -
wastewater
treatment
plant
Wood
Preserving
Silver
recovery
facility
Inactive
airfield with
buried drums
of pesticides
Farm equipment
and pesticide
storage yard
Media
(Quantity)
Sludge
(~39,QOOg)
Soil (12,680
cy>
Cyanide-
tainted x-ray
film chips
(1,300 cy)
Soil (3,200
cy)
Soil (200 cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Carbon Disulfide
Metals (Chromium,
Arsenic, and Copper)
Cyanide
Toxaphene, Ethyl
Parathion, and Methyl
Parathion
Pesticides (Methyl
Parathion)
Status
Project
Completed 8/91
Project
Completed;
operational
09/88 - 02/89
Project
completed;
operatonal
5/85 - 10/85
Project
completed;
Operational
4/85 - 10/85
Project
completed;
operational
7/87 - 9/87
Lead Agency and
Treatment Contractor
(if available)
Fund Lead; OH
Materials
Fund Lead/
Negotiation; Roy F.
Weston
Fund Lead; Mid-
American
Environmental
Service, Inc.
Fund Lead
Fund Lead; Crosby and
Overtoil
Contacts/
Phone
Vincent Zenone
215-597-3038
FTS 597-3038
Al Cherry
404-342-7791
FTS 257-7791
Ross Powers
312-378-7661
FTS 378-7661
Richard Martin
414-744-2288
FTS 484-2288
Dan Shane
415-744-2286
FTS 484-2286
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
31
-------
Table 3 (Continued)
Dechlorination
September, 1991
Region
1
2
2
2
6
6
6
7
Site Name, State,
Region (ROD Date)
Re-Solve, MA*
(09/24/87)
Also see Thermal
Desorption
Myers Property, NJ*
(09/28/90)
Also see Soil Washing
Signo Iradlns/Ht.
Vernon, Mlf (Emergency
Response -AH signed
12/19/86)
Wide Beach Development,
NY* (09/30/85)
Fruit land Drum, MM
(Emergency Response
-AM signed 9/8/90)
Sol Lynn/Industrial
Transformers, TX*
(03/25/88)
Tenth Street
Durap/Junkyard, OK*
CQ9/27/9Q)
Crown Plating, MO
(Emergency Response
-AM signed 8/29/S9)
Specific
Technology
Dechlorination of
Residuals from
Thermal Desorption
Dech Lori nation
(followed by soi I
washing)
KPEG Treatment
APEG dechlorination
using anaerobic
thermal process
unit
Dech I urination
APEG - Plus
Dechlorinstion
Deehlorirwtion
KPEG Treatment
Site
Description
Chemical
Reclamation
Facility
Pesticide
Manufacturing
Waste
management
facility
(warehouse)
Contaminated
Road Dust,
Driveways, and
Ditches
Operation and
maintenance
facility
Transformer
and Solvent
Recycler
Salvage yard
and industrial
waste dump
Electroplating
facility
Media
(Ouantity)
Residuals from
Thermal
Desorption of
22,500 cy of
.Soi I
Soi I and
Sediments
(50,000 cy
combined) ,'
Sludge (15
§als)
Soil (22,000
cy)
Liquid (150
gals/bench
scale)
Soil (800 ey);
Oil (400 gals)
Soil (7,500
cy)
Liquid (55
gals)
Key Contaminants
Treated
PCBs
SVOCs (Hexachloro-
benzene), DOT, Dioxin,
TCDD, ODD, and DDE
Dioxin (2,3,7,8 TCDD-
laden herbicides)
PCBs
Dioxins (2,4,S,T)
PCIs
PCBs
Herbicide (silvex; 2,4,5
TP)
Status
Design
completion
planned
1993
Predesign
Project
completed;
Operational
10/20/87 -
10/21/87
Project
complete;
Operational
10/90 - 6/91
Treatability
study for
APEG/KPEG was
unsuccessf u I ;
EPA
considering-
BCD
Installation
scheduled to
begin Fall '91
In design;
Oos i gn
completion
planned Spring
'92
Project
completed in
1989
Lead Agency and
Treatment Contractor
(if available)
PRP Lead/
Mixed Funding;
Chemical Waste
Management, Inc.
Fund lead/ In
Negot i at i on
Fund Lead; 'Gal son
Research Corp.
(subcontractor to
OHM)
Fund Lead/US ACE;
SoilTech, Inc.
(subcontractor to
Kimmins)
Fund Lead; Galson
Research Corp.
PRP Lead; Galson
Research Corp.
(subcontractor to
ENSR Consulting)
Fund Lead
Fund Lead
Contacts/
Phone
Lorenzo Thanto
617-223-5500
FTS 883-1500
John Prince
212-264-1213
FTS 264-1213
Charles
Fitzsiramons
201-321-6608
FTS 340-6608
Kerb King
212-264-1129
FTS 264-1129
Craig Car I ton
214-655-2270
FTS 255-2270
John Meyer
214-655-6735
FTS 255-6735
Noel Bennett
214-655-6715
FTS 655-6715
Nark Roberts
913-236-3881
FTS 757-3881
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
-------
Table 3 (Continued)
In situ Rushing
Septertxr, 1991
Region
2
2
2
2
3
3
4
Site Name, State,
Region (ROD Date)
Byron Barrel & Drun,
NY* C09/29/B9)
Goose Farm, HJ
< 09/27/85)
Lipari Landfill, KJ*
(09/30/85)
Vine tend Chemical, NJ,
02 (09/29/89)
Also see Soil Washing
L.A. Clarke & Sons, VA*
(03/31/88)
Also see
Bioremediat ion (Ex
situ)
U.S. Titanium, VA
(11/21/89)
Jadco- Hughes, MC
{ 09/27/90)
Also see Vacuum
Extraction
Spec i f i c
Technology
In situ soil
flushing
In situ soil
flushing
In situ flushing
In situ soil
flushing
In situ soi I
flushing
In situ dissolution
of waste
In situ soil
flushing (After
Vacuum Extraction)
Site
Description
Uncontrolled
Dump Site and
Landfill
Uncontrolled
Dump Site
Commercial
Dump Site
Pesticide
Manufacturing
Wood
Preserving
Titanium
Dioxide Plant
Solvent
Recovery and
Storage
Fact lity
Media
{Quantity)
Soil (5,200
cy)
Soil (quantity
not
available)
Soil (650,000
cy)
Soil (126,000
cy)
Soil (6,000
cy)
Waste (16,000
cy of ferrous
sulfate)
Soil (6,000
cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (PCE, TCE, DCE, and
DCA)
VOCs (Toluene,
Ethylbenzene,
Dichloromethane, end
TCE), SVQCs, PCBs, and
PAHS
VOCs (Benzene, DCA,
Dichloromethane, and
Toluene), Phenol, and
Metals (Chromium,
Nickel, Lead, and
Mercury)
Arsenic and VOCs
(Dichloromethane)
Creosote, PAHS, and
Benzene
Ferrous Sulfate
PCEs and Metals
(Arsenic, Barium,
Cadmium, Chromium, Lead,
Mercury, Selenium, and
Si Iver)
Status
In design;
Design
completion
planned
January '92
In design;
Design
completion
planned Winter
•91
Under
construction;
will be
operational
Fall '91
Predesign;
Design
completion
planned
Fall '92
In design;
Design
completion
planned Winter
'93
Predesign
In design;
des i gn
completion
planned Winter
'93
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP Lead
PRP Lead
Fund Lead; Bechtel
Environmental, Inc.
Fund Lead
PRP Lead
PRP Lead
PRP Lead
Contacts/
Phone
Eduardo Gonzales
212-264-5714
FTS 264-5714
Laura Lombardo
212-264-6787
FTS 264-6787
Fred Cataneo
212-264-9542
FTS 264-9542
Matthew Ucstgate
212-264-3406
FTS 264-3406
Eugene Winger!
215-597-1727
FTS 597-1727
Kim Hummel I
215-597-1727
FTS 597-1727
Barbara Benoy
404-347-7791
FTS 257-7791
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
33
-------
Table 3 (Continued)
In situ Flushing
Septafcer. 1991
Reg ton
5
5
6
9
to
Site Name, State,
Region (ROD Gate)
Ninth Avenue Dump, IN
(06/30/89)
U.S. Aviex, HI
(09/07/88)
South Cavalcade Street,
TX
(09/26/88)
Poly-Carb, NV
(Emergency Response
-AM signed 5/H/B7)
Also see Bioremediat ion
(In situ)
United Chrome Products,
OR* (09/12/86)
Specific
Technology
In situ soil
flushing
In situ soil
flushing
In situ soi L
flushing
Soil Flushing
In conjunction with
land treatment
In situ flushing
Site
Description
Commercial
Dump Site '
Chemical
Packaging
Facility
Wood
Preserving &
Coal Tar
Distillation
Commercial
waste
management
Chrome Plating
Facility
Media
(Quantity)
Soil (64,000
cy)
Soil (11,500
cy}
Soil (10,500
cy)
Soil (1,500
cy)
Soil (quantity
not available)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (iTEX, TCE), PAHs,
Phenols, Lead, PCBs, and
other Metals
VOCs (Carbon
Tetrachloride, OCA,
Ethylbenzene, PCE, TCE,
Toluene, TCA, Freon,
Xylene, and Chloroform)
PAHs
Phenols and Cresol
Chromium
Status
In design;
Design
completion
planned Winter
•93
In design;
Design
completion
planned Sunnier
•91
In design;
Design
completion
planned Summer
•93
Process
completed;
Operational
7/87 - 8/88
Operational
since 8/88
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP Lead
Fund Lead
PRP Lead
Fund Lead;
Crosby and Overton,
EMI (subcontractors
to Re i del
Environmental
Services)
Fund Lead
Contacts/
Phone
Alison Hiltner
313-353-6417
FTS 353-6417
Robert Uhippo
312-886-4759
FTS 886-4759
Hark Fite
214-655-6715
FTS 255-6715
Bob Handel
415-744-2290
FTS 484-2290
Loren NcPhillips
206-553-4903
FIS 399-4903
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
34
-------
Table 3 (Continued}
, 1991
In situ Vitrification
Region
5
5
*
5
5
6
8
Site Name, State,
Region (ROD Date)
Anderson Development,
HI (09/28/90)
Ionia City Landfill,
MI* (09/29/89)
Parsons Chemical (£IH
Enterprise), MI
(Emergency Response)
Sangamo/Crab Orchard
National Wildlife
Refuge, IL {08/01/90)
Crystal Chemical, TX
(09/27/90)
Rocky Mountain Arsenal
(OU 16), CO (02/26/90)
Specific
Technology
In situ Vitrifica-
tion (Thermal
desorption being
considered)
In situ
Vitrification
In situ
Vitrification
In situ
Vitrification
(Alternative is
incineration)
In situ
Vitrification
(Technology being
reconsidered)
In situ
Vitrification
Site
Description
Chemical
Manufacturing
Facility Waste
Lagoon
Municipal
Landfill
Agricultural
chemical
facility
Federal
Facility
Herbicide
Manufacturing
Federal
Faci lity
Media
(Quantity)
Soil, sludge,
and Clay (4000
cy)
Soil, Debris
(5,000 cy
contained)
Soil (2,000
cy)
Soil,
Sediments
(38,400 cy
combined)
Soil,
Sediments
(16,500 cy
combined) (15'
deep)
Soil (4,600
cy), Sludge
(5,800 cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
MBOCAs (4' Methylene
Bis-dichloroamline)
VOCs (Methylene
Chloride, Styrene,
Toluene, 1-1-1
Trichloroethane), and
Lead
Dioxin, Pesticides, and
Mercury
PCBs and Metals (lead
and Cadmium)
Arsenic
Metals (Arsenic and
Mercury) and Pesticides
Status HI Lead Agency and
HI Treatment Contractor
||[ (if available)
Predesign;
treatability
study underway
In design
Waste staging
in final
stages;
treatment
postponed
until Summer
1993
Predesign;
Design
completion
planned Sumner
• 94
Predesign
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
'91
PRP Lead
PRP Lead
Fund Lead; Geosafe
PRP Lead
Fund Lead/ In
negotiation
PRP Lead; (US Army)
Contacts/
Phone
Mike Valentino
312-886-4785
FTS 886-4785
Michael Gifford
312-886-7257
FTS 886-7257
Len Zentack
312-886-4246
FTS 886-4246
Mary Logan
312-353-9288
FTS 353-9288
Lisa Price
214-655-6735
FTS 255-6735
Linda Jacobson
303-294-1977
FTS 330-1977
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
35
-------
Table 3 (Continued)
September. 1991
Soil Washing
Region
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
Site Name, State, III Specific
Region (ROD Date) III Technology
Euan Property, NJ*
(09/29/89)
Also see Solvent
Extraction
GE Miring Devices, PR
(09/30/88)
King of Prussia, NJ
(09/28/90)
Myers Property, NJ
(09/28/90)
Also see
Dechlorination
Vineland Chemical, NJ
(09/29/89)
Also see In situ
Flushing
Cabot/Koppers, Ft
(09/27/90)
Also see
Bioremediation (In
situ}
Cape Fear Wood
Preserving, NC*
(06/30/89)
Soil Washing
(preceded by
Solvent Extraction)
Hydrometa 1 1 urg i ca I
Treatment
Soil Washing
Soil Washing
{preceded by
Dechlorination)
Soi I Washing
Soil Washing (may
be followed by
bioremediation of
residual)
Soil Washing
Site
Description
Industrial
Waste Dumping
Wiring
Services
Facility
Recycling
Facility
Pesticide
Manufacturing
Pesticide
Manufacturing
Uood Treating
and Pine Tar
Distillation
Facility
Wood
Preserving
Media
(Quantity)
Soil (22,000
cy>
Soil (5,500
cy)
Soil, Sludges,
Sediments
(20,150 cy
combined)
Soil,
Sediments
(50,000 cy
combined)
Sediments
(62,600 cy)
Soil (6,400
cy)
Soil (20,000
cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (BTX), SVOCs
(Naphthalene and 2,4-
dimethylphenol) and
Metals (Chromium and
Lead)
Mercury
Netals (Chromium,
Copper, and Stiver)
Netals (Aluminum,
Cadmium, Chromium,
Silver, and Sodium)
Arsenic
SVOCs CBis(2-
ethylhexyDphthalate,
Oimethylphenol,
Dinitrotoluene, Di-n-
octyl-phthalate,
Pentachlorophenol, and
PenolJ , and PAHs
Creosote, PAHs, Copper,
Chromium, Arsenic, and
Benzene
Status
P redesign;
Design
completion
planned Simmer
•94
Predesign;
Alternative
being
reconsidered
Predesign;
Design
completion
planned Sunnier
•93
Predesign
Predesign
In design;
pi lot study
planned;
Design
completion
planned Spring
•93
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
'91; Bid
advertisement
scheduled for
late Fall
Lead Agency and
Treatment Contractor
(if available)
PRP Lead
PRP Lead
PRP Lead
Fund lead/ In
Negotiation
Fund Lead
PRP Lead
Fund Lead
Contacts/
Phone
Craig OeBiase
212-264-5393
FTS 264-5393
Craig De Biase
212-264-5393
FTS 264-5393
Jim Hahnenberg
212-264-5387
FTS 264-5387
John Prince
212-264-1213
FTS 264-1213
Matthew West gate
212-264-3406
FTS 264-3406
Martha Barry
404-347-2643
FTS 257-2643
Jon Bornholm
404-347-7791
FTS 257-7791
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
36
-------
Table 5 (Continued)
Soil Washing
Sept eater, 1991
Region
4
4
4
5
5
6
6
Site Name, State,
Region (800 Date)
American Creosote
Works, FL*
(09/28/89)
Also see
iioremediation (Ex
Co leman- Evans Wood
Preserving, FL*
(09/26/90)
Also see
Bi oremediation (Ex
Southeastern Uood
Preserving, MS
(Emergency Response
-AN signed 9/30/90)
Bioremediation (Ex
Moss American, Ul
(09/27/90)
Also see
Bioremediation (Ex
United Scrap Lead/Si A,
OH* (09/30/88)
Arkuood, AS
(09/28/90)
Koppers/Texarkana, TX*
(09/23/88)
Specific
Technology
Soil Washing
(slurry- phase
biorwnediation for
fines)
Sofl Washing
(bioremediation of
fines)
Soil washing
followed by slurry
phase
bioremediation
Soil Washing
(bioremediation of
fines)
Soil Washing
Soil Washing
(incineration of
residuals)
Soil Washing
Site
Description
Wood
Preserving
Wood
Preserving
Uood
preserving
Uood
Preserving
Lead Battery
Recycling
Uood
Preserving
Wood
Preserving
Media
(Quantity)
Soil (21,000
cy)
Soil (27,000
cy)
Solids (8,000
cy)
Soil (80,000
cy)
Soil (45,000
cy). Sediments
(45,550 cy)
Soil (20,400
cy)
Soil (19,400
cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
Creosote, PAHs, SVOCs
(PCP), and Dioxins
PCP, Dioxin
SVOCs (PCP), PAHs, and
creosote
PAHs
Lead end Arsenic
PCP, PNA, and Dioxins
PAHs and SVOCs (PCP)
Status 1
In design;
Jesign delayed
for additional
treatabi lity
testing
In design;
Design
completion
planned Spring
'92
Project
ongoing;
Demonstration
on 700 cy 2/91
- 8/91; Full-
scale cleanup
began 8/91
Predesign;
des i gn
completion
planned 3/93
in design;
Design
completion
planned Spring
• 93
Predesign
Predesign
Lead Agency and
Treatment Contractor
(if available) j
Fund Lead
Fund Lead
Fund lead; OHH
Remediation Services
Corp.
PRP Lead,* West on,
Inc.
Fund Lead
PRP Lead
PRP Lead
Contacts/
Phone
Madeleine Streng
404-347-2643
FTS 257-2643
Tony Best
404-347-2643
FTS 257-2643
Don Reiger
404-347-3931
FTS 257-7931
Betty Lav is
312-886-4784
FTS 886-4784
Anita Boseman
312-886-6941
FTS 886-6941
Rick irhart
214-655-6582
FIS 255-6582
Ursula Lennox
214-6S5-673S
FTS 255-6735
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
37
-------
Table 3 (Continued)
September, 1991
Soil Washing
Region
6
8
9
Site Name, State,
Region (ROD Date)
South Cavalcade
Street, TX
(09/26/88)
Also see In situ
Flushing
Sand Creek Industrial
(OU 5), CO* (09/28/90)
toppers (Orovi I le
Plant), CA
(09/13/89)
Also see
Bioremediation (In
situ)
Specific
Technology
Soil Washing
Soil Washing
Soi L Washing
Site
Description
Wood
Preserving &
Coal Tar
Distillation
Refinery,
Pesticide
Manufacturing,
and landfill
wood
preserving
[Media
(Quantity)
Soil (19,500
cy)
Soil (14,000
cy)
Soil,
Sediments
(200,000 cy
combined)
Key Contaminants
Treated
PAHs
Chlordane, Dfeldrin,
4,4-DDT, 2-4 D, Hepta-
chlor, and Metals
(Arsenic and Chromium)
PAHs, SVQCs {PCP), and
Dioxin
Status
In design;
Design
completion
planned Summer
•93
In design;
Design
completion
planned Spring
•92
In design;
Design
completion
planned Summer
"92
Lead Agency and
Treatment Contractor
(if available)
PRP Lead
Fund Lead
PRP Lead
j
Contacts/
Phone
Mark Hte
214-655-6715
FTS 255-6715
Brian Pinkowski
303-293-1512
FTS 330-1512
Fred Schauffler
415-744-2365
FTS 484-2365
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
-------
Table 3 (Continued)
, 1991
Solvent Extraction
Region
1
1
1
2
4 "
6
Site Name, State,
Region (ROD Date)
Norwood PCBs, MA
(09/29/893
O'Connor, ME*
(09/27/89)
Pinette's Salvage Yard,
ME* (05/30/89)
Euan Property, NJ*
(09/29/89)
Also see Soil Washing
General Refining, GA*
(Emergency Response
-AH signed 8/13/855
Traband Warehouse, OK
(Emergency Response)
Specific
Technology
Solvent Extraction
Solvent Extraction
Solvent Extraction
Solvent Extraction
(followed by Soil
Washing)
Basic Extractive
Sludge Treatment
(BEST)
Solvent Extraction
Site
Description
Industrial
Waste Dumping
Salvage &
Electrical
Transformer
Recycling
Salvage and
Vehicle Repair
Industrial
Waste Dumping
Waste oil
recycling
facility
Storage
management
complex
Media
(Quantity)
Soil (28,000
cy)
Soil,
Sediments
(23,500 cy
combined)
Soil (2,080
cy)
Soil (22,000
cy)
Sludge (2,700
cy), Solids
(700 cy)
Waste Oil
(6,600 gals)
Concrete and
processed sand
from
sandblasting
operation
(quantity not
avai lable)
Key Contaminants
Treated
PCBs, PAHs and VOCs
(TCE, Trichlorobenzene)
PCB, PAHs, and Lead
PCBs, VOCs
(Chlorobenzene), SVOCs
(Dichlorobenzene and
Trichlorobenzene)
VOCs (BTX), SVOCs
(Naphthalene and 2,4-
dimethylphenol), and
Metals
PCBs, Metals (Arsenic,
Copper, and Lead)
PCBs
Status
p redesign;
Treatabi lity
study planned
Fall '91;
Design
completion
planned Suimer
•93
In design;
Design
carp let ion
planned Spring
•93
Contract
awarded Oct.
•90; to be
installed
Spring "92
Predesign;
Design
completion
planned Sunnier
•94
Project
completed;
Operatonal
8/86 - 10/86,
1/87 - 2/87
Project
Completed
Feb. '89
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
avai lable)
Fund Lead
PRP Lead
Fund Lead;
Sam van Group
(subcontractor to
Sevenson )
PRP Lead
Fund Lead; Resource
Conservation Co,
Fund Lead; Terra-
Clean
Contacts/
Phone
Jane Downing
617-573-5730
FTS 833-1708
Mike Jasinski
617-573-5786
FTS 833-1786
Ross Gil 1 el and
617-573-5766
FTS 833-1766
Craig DeBiase
212-264-5393
FTS 264-5393
Shane Hitchcock
404-347-3136
FTS 257-3136
Pat Harms ck
214-655-2270
FTS 255-2270
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
39
-------
Table 3 (Continued)
Scpt«fcer, 1991
Solvent Extraction
Region
6
Site Xame, State,
Region (ROD Date)
United Creosoting, TX*
(09/29/89)
Specific
Technology
Critical Fluid
Extraction
Site
Description
Wood
Preserving
Media
(Quantity)
Soil (67,000
cy>
Key Contaminants
Treated
PftHs, SVOCs (PCP), and
Dioxin
Status
In design;
Design
completion
planned Spring
'92
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
State Lead/
Fund Financed
Contacts/
Phone
Deborah Griswold
214-655-6715
FTS 255-6715
Paul Cravens (TX)
512-463-8182
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Mote: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
40
-------
Table 3 (Continued)
Septafcer, 1991
Thermal Desorption
Region
1
1
1
1
2
2
Site Name, State,
Region (ROD Date)
Cannon Engineering/
Bridgewater, MA
(03/31/88)
McKin, ME*
(07/22/85)
Ottati & Goss, MH
(01/16/87)
Re-Solve, HA*
(09/24/87)
Also see Dechlorination
American Thermostat, MY
(06/29/90)
CaldweU Trucking, HJ,*
02 (09/25/86)
Specific
Technology
Thermal Aeration
Thermal Aeration
Thermal Aeration
Rotary Thermal
X*TRAX* Desorber
(Dechlorination of
residues)
Thermal Desorption
Lou Temperature
Vapor fiat ion
Site
Description
Chemical Waste
Hand I ing,
Storage, &
Incineration
Facility
Waste Storage,
Transfer,
Disposal
Facility
Drun
Recondition-
ing Facility
Chemical
Reclamation .
Facility
Thermostat
Manufacturing
Unpermitted
Septic Waste
Faci lity
Media
(Quantity)
Soil (11,330
cy)
Soil (11,456
cy>
Soil (16,000
cy)
Soil (22,500
cy)
Soil (6,500
cy). Sediments
(300 cy)
Soil (20,000
cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (Benzene, TCE, and
Vinyl Chloride)
VOCs (TCE, 8TX)
VOCs (TCE, PCE, 1,2-DCA,
and Benzene)
PCBs
VOCs (PCE, TCE, OCE, and
Vinyl Chloride)
VOCs (TCI, PCE, and TCA)
Status
Project
completed;
Operational
5/90 - 10/90
Project
completed;
Operational
7/86 • 2/87
Project
completed;
Operational
6/89 - 9/89
Predesign;
Pilot test
planned for
Fall '91;
Design
completion
planned 1993
In design;
Design
completion
planned Spring
'92
In design;
Design
completion
planned Spring
•92
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
avai lable)
PRP Lead; Canon ie
Engineering
PRP Lead; Canonie
Engineering
PRP Lead; Canonie
Engineering
PRP Lead/
Mixed Funding;
Chemical Waste
Management, Inc.
Fund Lead
Fund Lead
Contacts/
Phone
Dan Cough I in
617-573-9620
FTS 833-9620
Shei la Eckman
617-573-5784
FTS 833-1784
Stephen Calder
617-573-9626
FTS 833-1626
Lorenzo Thantu
617-223-5500
FTS 833-1500
Christos Tsiamis
212-264-5713
FTS 264-5713
Ed Finnerty
212-264-3555
FTS 264-3555
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless othernise indicated.
41
-------
Table 3 (Continued)
Sept
1991
Thermal Description
Region
2
2
2
2
2
2
Site Name, State,
Region (ROD Date)
Claremont Polychemical ,
NY (09/28/90)
Fulton Terminals, MY
(09/29/89)
Marathon Battery, MY*
(09/30/88)
Metal tec/Aerosystems,
NJ (06/30/86)
Reich Farms, NJ
(09/30/88)
Sarney Farm, NY
(09/27/905
.Specific
Technology
Thermal Desorption
Low Temperature
Thermal Treatment
Enhanced
Volatilization
Low Temperature
Thermal Treatment
Enhanced
Volati lization
Low Temperature
Thermal Treatment
Site
Description
Chemical
Facility .
Former Waste
Tank Farm
Former Battery
Manufacturer
•Metal
Manufacturing
Uncontrolled
Waste Disposal
Industrial and
Municipal
Landfill
Media
(Quantity)
Soil (1,600
cy)
Soil (4,000
cy)
Soil (85,000
cy)
Soil (9,000
cy)
Soil (1,120
cy)
Soil (2,365
cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
DOT, ODD, DDE, VOCs
(OCE, PCE, TCE, and
Toluene), SVOCs
[Beruoic acid, Bis(2-
ethylhexyl )piithalate.
Butyl benzyl phthalate,
Di-n-fautyl phthalate.
Naphthalene, and PCPJ ,
and PAHs
(Benzo(a)pyrene)
VOCs (Xylene, Styrene,
TCI, ithylbenzene,
Toluene)
VOCs (PCE, Toluene, and
TCE)
VOCs (TCE)
VOCs and Setnivolatiles
VOCs (Benzene, Butanone,
Chloroform,
Hethylpentanone, TCE,
and Toluene)
Status
In design;
Design
completion
planned
Winter '92
P redesign
Predesign
In design;
Design
completion
planned Sumner
'91
Pilot studies
planned for
early "92;
design
completion
planned: Fall
'92
P redesign;
Design
completion
planned:
Spring '93
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Fund Lead; USAGE
PRP Lead
Fund Lead
Fund Lead; USACE
PRP Lead
Fund Lead
Contacts/
Phone
Carlos R. Ramos
212-264-5636
FTS 264-5636
Christos Tsiamis
212-264-5713
FTS 264-5713
Parti Tames
212-264-1036
FTS 264-1036
Jim Baly (USACE)
816-426-5221
Cary Adamkiewicz
212-264-7592
FTS 264-7592
Kevin Willis
212-264-8777
FTS 264-8777
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated?
42
-------
Table 3 (Continued)
September, 1991
Thermal Desorption
Region
2
4
5
5
a
Site Name, State,
Region (ROD Date}
Waldick Aerospace
Devices, NJ*
(09/29/87)
Warnchem, SC*
(06/30/88)
Outboard
Marine/Uaukegan Harbor,
IL*
(03/31/89)
University of
Minnesota, MN
(06/11/90)
Martin Marietta (Denver
Aerospace), CO*
(09/24/90)
See also Vacuum
Extraction
Spec i f i c I
Technology 1
Low Temperature
Thermal Treatment
Low Temperature
Thermal Treatment
Low Temperature
Thermal Extraction
(Taciuk Process)
Thermal Desorption
(Fume Incineration
of PCB Vapors)
Low Temperature
Thermal Treatment
Site
Description
Manufacturing
and
Electroplat-
ing of Plane
Parts
Former Dye
Manufacturing
Plant
Marine
Products
Manufacturing
University
Wastes
Aerospace
Equipment
Manufacturer
Media
(Quantity)
Soil (2,000
cy)
Soil (2,000
ey)
Soil,
Sediments
(16,000 cy
combined)
Soil (6,300
cy), Debris
(160 cy)
Soil (24,400
cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (TCE and PCE)
VOCs (BTX)
PCBs
PCBs
VOCS (TCE)
Status
In design;
Design
completion
planned
October '91
Jn design;
Design
completion
planned Fa 1 1
•91
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
•94
In design;
Design
completion
planned
Fall '92
Predesign
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
Fund Lead
PRP Lead
PRP Lead; Canonie
Engineering
PRP Lead- State
Oversight
State Lead
(under RCRA
Corrective Action
Authority)
Contacts/
Phone
USACE Contracts
Technical Issues;
William McFarland
(816) 426-5805
Contract Issues:
Susan Anderson
(816) 426-7424
George Reedy
404-347-7791
FTS 257-7791
Cindy Nolan
312-886-0400
FTS 886-0400
Oarrell Ouens
312-886-7089
FTS 886-4089
David Douglas (MN)
612-296-7818
George Dancik
303-293-1506
FTS 330-1506
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
43
-------
Table 3 (Continued)
Septofcer, 1991
Vacuum Extraction
Region
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
Site Name, State,
Region (ROC Date)
Groveland Wells, MA*
(09/30/88)
Kellogg-Deering Well
Field, CT
(09/29/89)
South Municipal Water
Supply Well, NH
(09/27/89)
Stamina Mills, RI
(09/28/90)
Tinkham Garage, NH*
(09/30/86)
Wells G&H, MA
(09/14/893
FAA Technical Center,
NJ (09/26/89)
Also see Bioremediation
(In situ)
SMS Instruments (Deer
Park), NY
(09/29/89)
Specific
Technology
Vapor Extraction
Vacuum Extraction
Vacuum Extraction
Vacuum Extraction
Vacuum Extraction
In situ
Volatilization
Vacuum Extraction
Vapor Extraction
Site
Description
Manufacturing
Municipal
Landfill
Commercial
Manufacturing
Textile
Manufacturing
Uncontrolled
Dump Site
Uncontrolled
Dump Site
Jet Fuel Farm
Military
Aircraft
Component
Overhauler
Media
(Quantity)
Soil (19,000
cy)
Soil (quantity
not available)
Soil (7,500
cy)
Soil (6,000
cy) (to 12'
depth)
Soil (9,000
cy)
Soil (7,400
cy)
Soil (33,000
cy)
Soil (1,250
cy) (to 25'
depth)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (TCI, Methylene
Chloride, and 4-methyl-
2-pentanone)
VOCs (TEE, PCE, iTEX,
DCE, TCA, OCA, and
Vinyl Chloride)
VOCs (PCE, TCA, and
TCE)
VOCs (DCE and TCE)
VOCs (Benzene,
Chloroform, DCE, PCE,
TCE, and Vinyl
Chloride)
VOCs (PCE and TCE)
VOCS (STEX), SVOCS
(Chlorophenol, Phenol),
PAHs
VOCs (TCE, Xylene,
Ethylbenzene, and
Chlorobenzene)
Status
In design;
In design;
Design
completion
planned Sunnier
•92
In design;
Design
completion
planned Summer
•92
P redesign
tn design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
•91
In design
In design;
Design
completion
planned 9/91
Cleanup
contract award
scheduled for
9/91
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PIP Lead
PRP Lead
PRP Lead
PRP Lead
PRP Lead;
Terra Vac
PRP Lead
PRP Lead
Fund Lead
Contacts/
Phone
Bob Leger
617-573-5734
FTS 833-1734
Leslie McVickar
617-573-9689
FTS 833-1689
Roger Ouwart
617-573-9628
FTS 833-1628
Neil Handler
617-573-9630
FTS 833-1630
Diana King
617-573-9676
FTS 833-1676
Barbara Newman
617-573-5736
FTS 833-1736
Carla Struble
212-264-4595
FTS 264-4595
Keith Buch (FAA)
609-484-6644
Miko Fayon
212-264-4706
FTS 264-4706
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed,
Hote: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
44
-------
Table 3 (Continued)
September, 1991
Vacuum Extraction
Region 11 Site Name, State,
|| Region (ROD Date)
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
4
Upjohn Manufacturing
Co., PR (09/30/88 for
gu; treatment completed
prior to ROD)
Vestal Uater Supply 1-
1, MY (09/27/90)
Bendix, PA
(09/30/88)
Henderson Road, PA*
(06/30/88)
Lord-Shope Landfill, PA
(06/29/90)
Tyson's Dump, PA*
C 03/3 1/88)
Hinson Chemical, SC
(Emergency Response •
AM signed 11/28/68)
Jadco-Hughes, NC
(09/27/90)
Also see In situ
Flushing
Specific
Technology
Vacuum Extraction
Vacuum Extraction
Vacuum Extraction
In situ
Volatilization
Vacuum Extraction
Vacuum Extraction
Vacuum Extraction
with in situ
Flushing Kith Air
Vacuum Extraction
(followed by in
situ soil flushing)
Site
Description
Industrial
Facility,
Chemical Leak
2 Areas within
an Industrial
Park.
Aircraft
Manufacturing
Injection Well
Industrial
Drum Landfill
Commercial
Surface
Impoundment
Waste
Reclaiming
Facility
Solvent
Recovery and
Storage
Facility
Media
(Quantity)
Soil (quantity
not available)
Soil;
Area (1)
19,000 cy;
Area (2) 6,000
cy
Soil (quantity
not avai table)
Soil (quantity
not available)
Soi I/source
(approxi-
mately 50,000
cy; to 15'
depth)
Soil (30,000
cyj
Soil (=80,000
cy; to 50'
depth)
Soil (6,000
cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (Carbon
Tetrachtoride and
Acetonitrile)
VOCs (DCA, TCA, TCE,
and DCE)
VOCs (TCE, Toluene,
Vinyl Chloride, OCE,
and Carbon
Tetrachloride), and
SVOCs
VOCs (BTEX,
Chlorobenzenes, DCA,
and 1,1,1 -TCA)
VOCs (Benzene, PCE, and
Toluene)
VOCs (Benzene, Toluene,
TCE, PCE, and
Trichloropropane)
VOCs
VOCs (Carbon Tetra-
chloride, Chloroform,
and Vinyl Chloride) and
SVOCs (Dichlorobenzene)
Status
Project
completed;
operational
late 1984 - to
3/88
Predesign;
Design
completion
planned Summer
•92
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
'92
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
'91
Predesign
Operational
since 11/88
Process
ongoing
12/88 -
present "
In design;
Design
completion
planned Winter
•93
Lead Agency and
Treatment II
Contractor (if j|
available) |
PRP Lead; Terra
Vac
Area (1) PRP Lead
Area (2) Fund
Lead
PRP Lead
PRP Lead
PRP Lead
PRP Lead; Terra
Vac
Fund Lead
PRP Lead
Contacts/
Phone
Alison Hess
212-264-6040
FTS 264-6040
Ed Als
212-Z64-OS22
FTS 264-0522
Humane Zia
215-597-0913
FTS 597-0913
Michael Towle
215-597-3166
FTS 597-3166
Jim Feeney
215-597-8257
FTS 597-8257
Eugene Dennis
215-597-8555
FTS 597-8555
Fred Stroud
404-347-3136
FTS 257-3136
Barbara Benoy
404-347-7791
FTS 257-7791
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
45
-------
Table 3 (Continued)
September, 1991
Vacuum Extraction
Region
4
5
5
5
5
5
Site Name, State,
Region (ROD Date}
SCRDi Bluff Road, SC
(09/13/90)
Fisher Calo Chen, IN
(08/07/90)
Hagen Farm, UI
(09/17/90)
Kysor Industrial, MI
(09/29/89)
Long Prairie, MN
(06/27/88)
MIOCO 1, IN*
(06/30/89)
Specific
Technology
Vacuum Extraction
Vapor Extraction
Vapor Extraction
(evaluating
effectiveness of
vapor extraction in
enhancing
bioremediat ion of
SVOCS)
Vacuum Extraction
Vacuum Extraction
Vapor Extraction
Site
Description
Solvent
Reclamation
Solvent
Reclamation
Industrial and
Municipal
Waste Disposal
Truck Parts
Manufacturing
Dry C leaning
Fac i I i ty
Commercial
Dunp Site
Media
(Quantity)
Soil {29,500
cy>
Soil (29,500
cy)
Soil /Waste
(24,000 cy)
Soil (13,200
cy)
Soil (3,600
cy)
Soil (12,400
cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (Carbon
Tetrachloride, Acetone,
Chloroform, ICA, DCS,
PCA, PCE, TCE, DCE,
Hethylene Chloride, 2-
Butanone, BTEX,
4,methyl-2,pentanone,
Vinyl Chloride)
VOCs (PCE, OCA, and TCA)
VOCs (BTEX, Butanone,
Tetrahydrofuran, and
Vinyl Chloride)
VOCs (Xylene, Tolyene,
Ethyl benzene, and ICE)
VOCs (DCE, PCE, ICE,
and Vinyl Chloride)
VOCs (BTX, TCE,
Phenol,
Dichloromethane,
2- Butanone, and
Ch I orobenzene) , PftHs,
and SVOCs
Status
P redesign;
Design
completion
planned
Summer '92
P redesign;
Design
completion
planned
Spring '93
Pilot Test
scheduled for
Winter '91 -
Design
completion
planned
Sunnier '92
In design;
Design
completion
planned Sunnier
'92
Cleanup
contract award
scheduled for
Fall '91.
P redesign
lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP Lead
Fund Lead
PRP Lead
PRP Lead (RD>;
RA in negotiation
State Lead/Fund
Financed
Fund Lead/ In
Negotiation
Contacts/
Phone
Steve Sandier
404-347-2643
FTS 257-2643
Brad Bradley
312-886-4742
FTS 886-4742
Jay Lee
312-886-4749
FTS 886-4749
Don DiGiulio
(RSKERL)
405-332-8800'
FTS 743-2011
Mary L, Gustafson
312-886-6144
FTS 886-6144
Kevin Turner
312-886-4444
FTS 886-4444
Richard Boice
312-886-4740
FTS 886-4740
Note:
Indicates that a treatabiltty study has been completed.
Contacts listed ere EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
46
-------
Table 3 (Continued)
Septcrfier. 1991
Vacuum Extraction
Region
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
Site Name, State,
Region (ROD Date)
Miami County
Incinerator, OH
(06/30/89)
Pristine (Amendment),
OH (03/30/90)
Seymour Recycling, IN*
OS (09/30/87)
Also see
Bioremediation (In
situ)
Springfield Township
Dump, MI (09/29/90)
Verona Well Field, MI*
(08/12/85)
Uausau Groundwater
Contamination, VI*
(09/29/893
Wayne Waste
Reclamation, IN
(03/30/90)
South Valley /Edmunds,
NM (09/30/88)
Specific
Technology
Vapor Extraction
Vapor Extraction
(Replaces in situ
vitrification)
Vacuum Extraction
Vacuum Extraction
Vacuum Extraction
Vapor Extraction
Vapor Extraction
Vapor Extraction
Site
Description
Municipal
Landfill and
Surface
Impoundment
Conne rcial
Dump Site
Chemical Waste
Management &
Incineration
Industrial
Waste Dump
Railroad Paint
Shop, Solvent
Reclaiming/
Distribution
Bulk Chemical
Distribution,
Machine Shop
Dump Site
Aircraft
Engine
Manufacturing
Media
(Quantity)
Soil (98,000
cy)
Soil (quantity
unknown • to
12' depth)
Soil (154,000
cy)
Soil (100,000
cy)
Soil (35,000
ey)
Soil (1,300
cy)
Soil (300,000
cy -
approximately
10 acres to
20' depth)
Soil (36,000
cy)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (TCE, PCE, and
Toluene)
VOCs {Beniene,
Chloroform, Diehloro-
ethane, PCE, and TCE)
and SVOCs (Phenol)
VOCs (TCA, Carbon
Tetrachloride, PCE,
Beniene, Vinyl
Chloride, Chloroethane,
and TCE)
VOCs (Butanone,
Chlorobenzene, TCA,
TCE, and Toluene)
VOCs (Dichlorotnethane,
Chloroform, Carbon
Tetrachloride, DCA,
TCA, Vinyl Chloride,
and BTEX) and
Naphthalene
VOCs (TCE, PCE, and
DCE)
VOCs (ICE, DCE, BTEX,
and Vinyl Chloride)
VOCs (TCE)
Status
P redesign
P redesign
Operational
since April
1991
Predesfgn
Operational
since 3/88
In design;
Design
completion
planned Spring
'92
P redesign
In Design;
Start planned
11/91
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP Lead
PRP Lead;
Hydrogeo-Chem
PRP Lead;
Canonic
Engineering
(Installation),
Geraghty & Miller
(Operation)
PRP Lead
Fund Lead;
Terra Vac
(subcontractor to
CHZH-Kill)
PRP Lead;
Hydrogeo-Chem
PRP Lead
PRP Lead
Contacts/
Phone
Anthony Rutter
312-886-8961
FTS 886-8961
Thomas Alcano
312-886-7278
FTS 886-7278
Jeff Gore
312-886-6552
FTS 886-6552
Nary Lou Martin
312-353-6284
FTS 353-6284
Margaret Cuerriero
312-886-0399
FTS 886-0399
Margaret Guerriero
312-886-0399
FTS 886-0399
Tinka Hyde
312-886-9296
FTS 886-9296
Tim Underwood
214-655-6730
FTS 255-6730
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
47
-------
Table 3 (Continued)
September, 1991
Vacuum Extraction
Region
6
7
7
7
7
7
8
Site Name, State,
Region (ROD Date)
Tinker AFB CSoldier
Creek/Bldg. 3001}, OK
(08/16/90)
Hastings Ground water
Contamination, Colorado
Ave., HE*
(09/28/88)
Hastings Groundwater
Contamination, Far-Mar-
Co, HE*
(09/30/88)
Hastings Groundwater
Contamination, Melt No.
3, NE*
(09/26/89)
Lindsay Manufacturing,
NE (09/28/90)
Waver I y Groundwater
Contamination, NE
(09/26/90)
Martin Marietta (Denver
Aerospace), CO
(09/24/90)
Also see Thermal
Desorption
Specific
Technology
Vacuum Extraction
Vapor Extraction
Vapor Extraction
Vapor Extraction
Vapor Extraction
Vapor Extraction
Vapor Extraction
Site
Description
Maintenance
Facility for
Aircraft
Industrial
Metal
Finishing
Former Grain
Storage Area
(Fumigants)
Former Grain
Storage Area
(Fumigants)
Metal
Finishing Site
Grain Storage
(Funiganta)
Aerospace
Equipment
Manufacturer
Media
(Quantity)
Soil (quantity
not available)
Soil (42,700
cy)
Soit (400 cy)
Soil (quantity
not available)
(7 extraction
wells, planned)
Soil (to SO'
depth)
Soi I (5 acres
to 10 - 20
feet deep)
Soil
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (TCE, Acetone,
Chtorobenzene,
Ethylbenzene,
Methylene Chloride,
Styrene, Toluene, and
Xylene)
VOCs (PCE, TCE, and
TCA)
VOCs (Carbon
Tetrachloride and
Ethylene Di bromide)
VOCs (Carbon
Tetrachloride and
Chloroform)
VOCS (DCA, OCE, TCE,
and PCE)
VOCs (Carbon
Tetrachloride and
Chloroform)
VOCs (TCE)
Status
P redesign;
Design
completion
planned Sunnier
'92
In design
In design;
Design
completion
planned Spring
'92
In design;
Design
completion
planned Fall
•91;
Construction
bid package to
be advertised
Fall '91.
P redesign
System
Operat i ng
since 2/88
Predesign
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
avai I able)
PRP Lead (Air
Force)
PRP Lead
PRP Lead
Fund Lead
PRP Lead
PRP Lead (USDA)
State Lead (under
RCRA Corrective
Action Authority)
Contacts/
Phone
Susan Webster
214-655-6730
FTS 255-6730
Barrel Sommerhauser
913-551-7711
FTS 276-7711
Susan Hoff
913-551-7786
FTS 276-7786
Diane Easley
913-551-7797
US 276-7797
Steve Roe
(Morrison Knudsen)
303-793-5054
Cecelia Topla
913-551-7052
FTS 276-7052
Gene Gunn
913-551-7776
FTS 276-7776
George Dartcik
303-293-1506
FTS 330-1506
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
48
-------
Table 3 (Continued)
September, 1991
Vacuum Extraction
Region
8
8
9
9
9
9
9
Site Name, State,
Region (ROD Date}
Rocky Mountain Arsenal
COU 18} , CO (02/26/90)
Sand Creek Industrial
(OUT), CO* (09/29/89)
Motorola 52nd Street,
AZ* (09/30/88)
Phocni x-Goodyear
Airport Area {North
facility and South
facility), AZ*
(09/26/89)
Fairchild Semiconductor
(San Jose), CA*
(03/20/89)
Fairchild
Semiconductor/
MTV- I CA*
(06/09/89)
Fairchi Id
Serai conductor /Ml V- 1 1 ,
GA* (06/30/89)
Specific
Technology
Vapor Extraction
Vacuum Extraction
Vapor Extraction
Vapor Extraction
Vapor Extraction
Vapor Extraction
Vapor extraction
Site
Description
Federal
Faci lity
Refinery,
Pesticides
Manufac-
turing, Acid
D i I u t i on
Landfill
Manufactur-
ing Facility
Defense-
related
Manufacturing
Facility
Semiconductor
Manufacturing
Facility
Semiconductor
Manufacturing
Faci lity,
Metal Finisher
Semiconductor
Manufacturing
Faci lity.
Metal Finisher
Media
(Quantity)
!
Soil (4,000
cy)
Soil (»1QO,000
cy)
Soil (60'
radius to 25'
depth)
Soil; North
Facility
(HO, 000 sq.
ft. to 50 ft.
depth) 260,000
cy; South
Faci lity
870 cy
Soil {3,400
cy)
Soil (quantity
not avai table)
Soil (quantity
not available)
Key Contaminants
Treated
TCE
VOCs (TCE, PCE,
Methylene Chloride, and
Chloroform)
VOCs (TCA, TCE, PCI,
Carbon Tetraehloride,
and Ethylbenzen«)
North Facility VOCs
(TCE, Hethylethyl
Ketone, Acetone)
South Facility
VOCs (TCE, TCA)
VOCs (TCA, Xylenes,
Acetone, Freon, DCE,
and PCE)
VOCs {TCE, PCE, Vinyl
Chloride, DCA, DCE, and
Freon) and SVOCs
(Phenol)
VOCs (TCE, PCE, Vinyl
Chloride, DCA, DCE, and
Freon) and SVOCs
(phenol)
Status
Initial design
completed 1/91
Pi lot study
underway; may
modify design
Design
completed;
will install
after HAPLs
addressed
In design;
pilot test
planned for
Summer ' 91
In design;
Design
completion
planned
North - Spring
1992
South - Fall
1992
Operational
since 1988
In design;
Design
completion
planned '93
Design
completion
planned '93
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP Lead (U.S.
Army)
Fund Lead; URS
PRP Lead/
State Oversight;
Dames and Moore
PRP Lead
PRP Lead/
State Enforcement;
Canoni e
Engineering
PRP Lead
PRP Lead
Contacts/
Phone
Linda Jacobson
303-294-1977
FTS 330-1977
Brian Pinkouskt
303-293-1512
FTS 330-1512
John Chinnook
-------
Table 3 (Continued)
September, 1991
Vacuum Extraction
Region
9
9
9
9
9
9
10
Site Name, State,
Region (ROD Date)
IBM (San Jose),
CA* (12/ 15/88)
(site delisted
10/04/89)
Intel, Mountain Vie«,
CA*
(06/09/89)
Intersil/Siemens, CA
(09/27/90)
Raytheon, Mountain
Vie*, CA* (06/09/89)
Solvent Service, CA*
(09/27/90)
Uatlcins-Johnson, CA*
(06/29/90)
Commencement
Bay/ 5. Tacoma
Channel/Well 12A
WA (1987)
(This site was inacfwittntly omitted
from tta tabulations usad for Ihe
graphics In the Introduction)
Specific
Technology
Vapor Extraction
Vapor Extraction
Vapor Extraction
Vapor Extraction
Vacuum Extraction
(Heat enhanced SVE)
Vapor Extraction
Soil aeration
Site
Description
Computer
Manufacturer
Semiconductor
Manufacturing
Facility,
Metal
Finisher,
Aircraft
Maintenance
Semiconductor
Manufacturer
Semiconductor
Manufacturing
Facility,
Netal
Finisher,
Aircraft
Maintenance
Solvent
Operation
Electronics
Manufacturing
Solvent
Recycling
Media
(Quantity)
Soil (24,000
cy)
Soil (quantity
not avai lable)
Soil (quantity
not available)
Soil (quantity
not available)
Soil (quantity
not available)
Soi 1 (up to
20' depth -
quantity not
available)
Soil (100,000
cy; to 35 ft
deep)
Key Contaminants
Treated
VOCs (Xylenes, Acetone,
Freon, Isopropyl
Alcohol, Petroleum
Naphtha, and TCA)
VOCS (TCE, PCE, Vinyl
Chloride, DCA, DC£, and
Freon) and SVOCs
(Phenol)
VOCs (total)
VOCs (TCE, PCE, Vinyl
Chloride, DCA, OCE, and
Freon) and SVOCs
(Phenol)
VOCs (Total, Acetone,
Ethylbenzene, TCA, and
Xylenes), and SVOCs
(Dfehlorobenzene)
VOCs (DCE, TCA, and
TCE)
VOCs (PCE, TCE, and
TCA)
Status
Installation
underway; Mid
be operational
in 1991
In design;
Design
completion
planned "93
Operational
In design;
Design
completion
planned '93
Operat i ona I
P redesign
Contracted;
instal lation
to begin late
October 1991
Lead Agency and
Treatment
Contractor (if
available)
PRP Lead/
State Enforcement;
Terra Vac
PRP Lead
State Lead;
Levine- Frisks
PRP Lead
State Lead under
RCRA Authority
PRP Lead
fund lead
AUD Technologies,
Inc.
Contacts/
Phone
Helen KcKinley
415-744-2236
FTS 484-2236
will Bruhns (CA)
415-464-0838
Pat tie Collins
415-744-2229
FTS 484-2229
Marie Lacey
415-744-2234
FTS 484-2234
Pattie Collins
415-744-2229
FTS 484-2229
Marie Lacey
415-744-2254
FTS 484-2234
Elizabeth Keicher
415-744-2361
FTS 484-2361
Kevin Rochlin
206-553-2106
FTS 399-2106
* Indicates that a treatability study has been completed.
Note: Contacts listed are EPA regional staff unless otherwise indicated.
50
-------
APPENDIX A
REMEDIAL SITES USING ESTABLISHED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
The table included as Appendix A shows NPL sites where established treatment technologies have been selected as part
of the remedy. Established treatment technologies include: incineration, solidification/stabilization, and others. The sites are
ordered by fiscal year to give some initial information as to the status of implementation; i.e., the older the ROD, the more
likely that design and construction have begun.
A-l
-------
APPENDIX A
REMEDIAL ACTION SITES USING ESTABLISHED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
Septenfcer, 1991
On Site Incineration
ft REGION SITE NAME STATE
85 02 Bog Creek Farm NJ
85 02 ' Bridgeport Rental & Oil HJ
85 05 ACME Solvent IL
85 • 06 MOTCO TX
86 01 Baird & HcGuire HA
86 04 Moubray Engineering AL
86 05 LaSalle Electrical Utilities IL
86 05 Arrowhead Refinery MN
86 05 Fields Brook OH
86 06 Sikes Disposal Pit TX
87 01 Ottati & Goss NH
87 01 Davis Liquid Waste RI
87 04 Tower Chemical FL
87 04 Geiger/C&M Oil SC
87 05 Rose Township Dump MI
B7 05 Laskin/Poplar Oil OH
87 06 Bayou Bonfouca LA
87 06 Cleve Reber LA
88 01 Rose Disposal Pit MA
88 02 Lipari Landfill NJ
88 02 Love Canal NT
88 03 Delaware Sand & Gravel DE
88 03 Southern Maryland Wood MD
Treating
88 03 Drake Chemical/Phase III PA
88 03 Ordnance Works Disposal WV
88 04 Ze11 wood Groundwater FL
88 05 LaSalle Electrical Utilities IL
88 05 Fort Wayne Reduction IN
88 05 Forest Waste Products MI
88 05 Pristine OH
88 05 Summit National Liquid Disposal OH
88 06 Old Midland Products AR
88 06 Brio Refining TX
88 07 Times Beach MO
88 08 Broderick Wood Products CO
89 01 Baird and McCuire MA
89 01 Wells GSH MA
89 02 Bog Creek Farm NJ
89 02 De Rewal Chemical NJ
89 03 Oouglasvilie Disposal PA
89 04 Smith's Farm Brooks KY
89 04 Aberdeen Pesticide Dumps/ NC
Fairway
89 04 Celanese NC
89 04 American Creosote Works TN
89 05 Ninth Avenue Dump IN
89 05 New Brighton/Arden Hills MM
89 05 Big D Campground OK
89 05 Laskin/Poplar Oil OH
On Site Incineration (continued)
FY REGION SITE NAME
90 01 New Bedford
90 03 M.W. Manufacturing
90 05 Fisher Calo
90 05 Bofors Nobel
90 05 Springfield Township Dump
90 05 Pristine {Amendment)
90 06 Vertac
90 06 Texarkana Wood Preserving
90 07 Missouri Electric Works
90 07 Hastings Groundwater
Contamination (East Industrial
Park)
90 10 FMC Yakima Pit
Off Site Incineration
FY REGION SITE NAME
84 05 Berlin & Farro Liquid
Incineration
84 05 Laskin/Poplar Oil
84 10 Western Processing
Phase I
85 02 Swope Oil & Chemical
85 05 Byron/Johnson Salvage
Yard
85 06 Triangle Chemical
85 08 Uoodbury Chemical
86 03 Drake Chemical/Phase II
86 03 West line
86 05 Metamora Landfill
86 05 Spiegelberg Landfill
86 07 Ellisville Area/Bliss
87 02 Williams Property
87 04 Sodyeco
87 06 Sand Springs Petrochemical
Complex
88 01 Cannon Engineering/Plymouth
88 02 Ewan Property
88 02 Reich Farms
88 02 Brewster Well Field
88 03 Wildcat Landfill
88 03 Berks Sand Pit
88 03 Douglassvi lie Disposal'
88 03 Fike Chemical .
STATE
MA
PA
IN
MI
Ml
OH
AR
TX
KO
HE
WA
STATE
HI
OH
WA
NJ
IL
TX
CO
PA
PA
HI
Ml
MO
NJ
NC
OK
MA
NJ
NJ
NY
DE
PA
PA
WV
A-2
-------
APPENDIX A
REMEDIAL ACTION SITES USING ESTABUSHED TREATMEITT TECHKQLOGIES
Septenfcer. 1991
FY
88
88
88
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
FY
82
84
85
85
86
86
86
86
REGIOM
05
07
07
01
01
01
02
03
03
04
05
OS
05
05
06
08
01
01
02
02
02
02
02
03
06
06
06
07
07
08
08
08
Off Site Incineration (continued)
SITE NAKE
Belvidere Municipal
Landfill #1
Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek
Syntex
W.R. Grace (Acton Plant)
O'Connor
Pinette's Salvage Yard
Claremont Polyehemical
M.U. Manufacturing .
Whitmoyer laboratories
Nensom Brothers Old Reiehold
Cross Brothers Pail "
Wedzeb
CUff/Dow Oump
A I sco Anaconda
United Creosoting
tfoodbury Chemical
Beacon Heights Landfill
Kearsarge' Metallurgical
FAA Technical Center
Hooker Chemical -Ruco Polymer
Sayreville landfill
Mattiace Petrochemicals
Sealand Restoration
Greenwood Chemical
Jacksonville Municipal Landfill
Rogers Road Municipal Landfill
Hardage/Criner (Amendment)
Fairfietd Coal Gasification
Plant
Shenandoah Stables
Martin Marietta {Denver Aerospace)
sand Creek Industrial
Ogden Defense Depot
STATE
IL
MO
HO
MA
ME
ME
NY
PA
PA
MS
it
IN
M!
OH
TX
CO
CT
MH
MJ
NJ
NJ
NY
NY
VA
AR
AR
OK
IA
MO
CO
CO
UT
REGION
03
06
04
10
02
03
04
04
Sotidification/Stabilization
SITE NAME STATE
Bruin Lagoon PA
Bioccology Systems TX
Davie Landfi11 FL
Western Processing/Phase II UA
Marathon Battery NY
Bruin Lagoon PA
Pepper's Steel & Alloy FL
Sapp Battery Salvage FL
Sotidification/Stabilization (continued)
FY REGION ' SITE NAME STATE
86 OS Burrows Sanitation MI
86 OS Forest Waste Products Ml
87 01 Davis Liquid Waste Rl
87 02 Chemical Control NJ
87 04 Gold Coast FL
87 04 Ceiier/C&M Oil SC
87 04 Independent Nail SC
87 04 Palmetto Wood Preserving SC
87 05 Liquid Disposal Mi
87 05 Northern Engraving yi
87 06 Gurley Pit AR
87 06 Mid-South Wood AR
87 06 Cleve Reber LA
87 06 Sand Spring Petrochemical OK
Complex
88 Ot Charles George Land Reclamation MA
88 02 Love Canal NY
88 02 Marathon Battery NY
88 02 York Oil NY
88 03 Alladin Plating PA
88 03 Fike Chemical Uv
88 04 Broun Wood Preserving Ft
88 04 Flowood MS
88 04 Chemtronics r NC
88 05 velsicol Chemical ' IL
88 05 Mid-State Disposal Landfill WI
88 06 Industrial Waste Control AR
88 06 Bailey Waste Disposal TX
88 06 Brio Refining TX
88 06 French Limited TX
88 07 Midwest Manufacturing/ , IA
North Farm
88 09 Selma Pressure Treating Cft
88 10 Pacific Hide & Fur Recycling 50
88 10 Gould OR
88 10 Commencement Bay/NTF UA
88 10 Frontier Hard Chrome WA
89 01 Sullivan's Ledge MA
89 01 W.R, Grace (Acton Plant) MA
89 01 O'Connor ME
89 02 DcRewal Chemical NJ
89 02 Marathon Battery NY
89 03 Craig Farm PA
89 03 Pouglassville Disposal PA
89 03 Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard PA
89 03 Ordnance Works Disposal WV
89 04 Kassouf-Kimerling Battery FL
89 04 Celanese NC
89 04 Aumicola Dump TN
89 05 MIDCO I IN
A-3
-------
APPENDIX A
REMEDIAL ACTION SITES USING ESTABLISHED TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
Septenfcer, 1991
Solidification/Stabilization C con tinned)
Other
FY
89
89
89
89
89
89
89
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
GION
05
05
06
06 '
07
09
09
01
02
03
03
03
04
04
04
s
04
04
04
04
05
05
05
06
06
07
or
OS
08
09
10
SITE NAME S
MIOCO 11
Auto Ion Chemicals
Pesses Chemical
Sheridan Disposal Services
Vogel Paint & Wax
Koppers (Qroville Plant)
Purity Oil Sales
New Bedford
Roebling Steel
M.U, Manufacturing
C&R Battery
Greenyood Chemical
62nd Street Dump
Cabot/Koppers
Col eman- Evans yood Preserving
(Amendment)
Kassourf -Kimerling Battery
Disposal
Sehuylkill Metal
Yellow Wate Road
Zelluood Groundwater
Contamination (Amendment)
yayne Kaste Oil
Springfield Township Dump
Oconomowoc Electroplating
Jacksonville Municipal Landfill
Rogers Road Municipal Landfill
Shenandoah Stables
Hastings Grounduater Contamination
(East Industrial Park)
Martin Marietta (Denver
Aerospace)
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (OU 17)
J.H. Baxter
Teledyne yah Chang Albany (TWCA)
TATI
IN
MI
TX
TX
IA
CA
CA
MA
NJ
PA
VA
VA
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
IN
HI
WI
AR
AR
MO
HE
CO
CO
CA
OR
FY
85
86
87
88
88
89
89
89
89
90
REGION
06
04
03
03
07
09
09
09
09
04
SITE NAME
STATE TECHNOLOGY
Triangle Chemical TX
Hal Iingsworth Solderless FL
West Virginia Ordnance UV
Bendix Flight System PA
Arkansas City Dump KS
Fairehitd Semiconductor/ CA
MTV-i
Fairehild Semiconductor/ CA
MTV-11
Intel, Mountain View CA
Raytheon, Mountain View CA
Hone Valley Landfill KY
Soil Aeration
Soil Aeration
In situ Flamming
SoiI Aeration
Chemical
Neutralization
Soil Aeration
Soil Aeration
Soil Aeration
Soil Aeration
Soil Aeration
A-4
-------
September, 1991
DOCUMENT REQUEST FORM
The "Innovative Treatment Technologies: Semi-Annual Status Report" (EPA/540/2-91/001) is distributed twice a year to Superfund
management in U.S. EPA Headquarters and regional offices, pertinent EPA laboratories, states, EPA libraries, and representatives of other
federal agencies. All project contacts listed in the report also receive a copy. If you did not receive this report directly, and would like
to get on the mailing list, please complete the following form, and send to:
Ms. Dana Mun
PRC Environmental Management Inc.
1505 Planning Research Drive
McLean, VA 22102
Q Please add my name to the mailing list:
NAME
COMPANY
ADDRESS
If you have questions or additional information regarding the use of innovative trealmenl technologies at these or other Superfund sites,
please call Linda Fiedler at FTS 398-8799 or (703) 308-8799.
------- |