EPA/540/8-90/006
April 1990
ROD ANNUAL REPORT
FY 1989
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, D.C. 20460
-------
-------
FY 1989 ROD ANNUAL REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTIONS
I. Introduction
II. Records of Decision Abstracts
III. Records of Decision Summary Table: FY 1989
IV. Records of Decision Summary Table: FY 1982-1988
V. Records of Decision Keyword List: FY 1982-1989
PAGES
1-29
31-150
151-199
201-297
299-374
ill
-------
-------
SECTION I
INTRODUCTION
-------
INTRODUCTION
FY 1989 marks the third year since the passage
of the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), which
amended the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of
1980 (CERCLA). During this period, the
remedial program has modified its approach in
site cleanups to reflect mandates in CERCLA, as
amended by SARA; for example, Section 121 of
CERCLA mandates the selection of a remedial
action that is protective of human health and the
environment, complies with applicable or relevant
and appropriate Federal and State requirements
(ARARs), is cost-effective, and utilizes permanent
solutions and alternative treatment technologies
or resource recovery technologies to the maximum
extent practicable. In addition, CERCLA includes
a preference for remedies that employ treatment
that permanently and significantly reduces the
volume, toxicity, or mobility of hazardous wastes
as a principal element, and requires an
explanation in those cases in which the selected
remedy does not satisfy this preference. The
Records of Decision (RODs) listed in this report
document compliance with these mandates in the
remedial program in FY 1989. All of the FY
1989 RODs were approved at the Regional level,
which is consistent with the policy initiated in FY
1986 to delegate ROD approval authority to the
Regions.
FY 1989 RODs
One hundred thirty-nine (139) RODs and four
(4) ROD Amendments, including Fund-lead,
Enforcement-lead, and Federal Facility RODs
were signed during FY 1989. The data in the
ROD Annual Report are based on these 143
RODs and ROD Amendments; for clarity,
however, these are collectively referred to as
RODs throughout the remainder of the report.
Ninety-five (95) of the FY 1989 RODs addressed
final source control. The remaining 48 RODs
selected interim source control actions (10),
ground water remedies only (26), or no action/no
further action (12). Forty-eight (48) RODs
selected both source control and ground water
remediation components.
In keeping with CERCLA Section 121 and the
National Contingency Plan's (NCP) program
expectations, source treatment was selected in 69
of the 95 final source control RODs. In addition,
24 of the 29 final and interim source control
RODs that selected containment only were large
landfills, mining waste/smelter sites, or asbestos
sites. This is consistent with the NCP expectation
that treatment will often be impractical for these
types of sites. Also in keeping with NCP
program expectations, ground water should be
returned to its beneficial uses within a reasonable
time frame, when practicable. This expectation
has been evidenced by the selection of active
ground water treatment in addition to a source
control remedy in 47 RODs, and in 20 RODs
where source control was not being addressed.
Exhibits 1 through 7 summarize the results of the
143 FY 1989 selected remedies. These remedies
are presented in abstract form in this report.
Exhibit 1 provides a quantitative summary of
remedial action components by final and interim
actions. This exhibit demonstrates that
occurrences of the use of treatment technologies
(100) in selected remedies exceeded that of
containment only (31) by a factor of more than
three, and ground water treatment occurs in
nearly half of the selected remedies (67 pump-
and-treat remedies out of 143 RODs). Exhibit 2
illustrates the frequency with which treatment
technologies were selected in final and interim
source control RODs. These data reflect the 100
occurrences of treatment technologies employed
in the 76 final and interim source control RODs.
Therefore, more than one treatment technology
may be associated with a ROD.
Incineration/thermal treatment was selected most
frequently (30 RODs), followed by
solidification/stabilization (18 RODs), and vacuum
extraction (17 RODs). Solvent extraction was
selected in 6 RODs, which represents a significant
improvement in the use of this treatment
technology in the remedial program compared to
previous fiscal years. Exhibit 3 portrays the
source control remedial action components
presented in Exhibit 1 as either final or interim
remedies. Exhibit 4 illustrates the number of
-------
final and interim source control remedies
employed in each treatment category. Of the 100
treatment technologies selected, 81 were selected
in final source control RODs, while 19 were
selected in interim source control RODs.
An index of site remedies for FY 1989 is
provided in Exhibit 5. This index contains RODs
grouped by the specific type of source control
and/or non-source control remedies selected. To
accurately assess the technology data presented in
Exhibits 1 through 5, a description of each
treatment category is provided in Exhibit 6. Also
included, in Exhibit 7, is a summary of FY 1989
ROD data on estimated remedial action costs.
Historical Overview FY 1982-1989
The passage of SARA strengthened and extended
the Superfund program while maintaining the
overall framework for implementation. New
requirements under CERCLA, as amended by
SARA, were intended to ensure protective
cleanup standards, permanent remedies, and the
use of alternative technologies, where applicable.
An historical overview of FY 1982-1989 RODs is
provided in Exhibits 8 through 12 to show annual
progress in achieving statutory mandates. This
overview includes data collected for Exhibits 1
through 7 (e.g., the number of RODs signed per
year, the use of treatment technologies for source
control, and the estimated remedial action costs).
Exhibit 8 depicts the number of RODs signed per
fiscal year. This demonstrates that there has been
a marked increase in the number of RODs signed
since the enactment of SARA compared to the
pre-SARA years of the remedial program.
Exhibit 9 is a quantitative overview of the
occurrences in which treatment technologies have
been selected in final and interim source control
RODs. An index of the ROD sites where these
treatment technologies were selected is provided
in Exhibit 10 for reference.
Comparative data on the selection of treatment
technologies in final and interim source control
remedies for post-SARA RODS (FY 1987-1989)
are presented in Exhibit 11. These data
demonstrate that, in accordance with SARA,
there has been an increase in the percentage of
RODs selecting treatment as a principal element
of source control and an increase in the
percentage of the treatment technologies selected
that were innovative (e.g., treatment technologies
other than incineration/thermal treatment and
solidification/stabilization). A comparison of FY
1982-1989 ROD data on remedial action costs is
summarized in Exhibit 12.
During FY 1990, EPA plans a comprehensive
review of historical ROD data based on current
definitions of treatment technologies, and interim
and final remedial action categories.
FY 1989 ROD Annual Report
The FY 1989 ROD Annual Report is designed to
provide the Regions, Headquarters, and the public
with summary information on FY 1989 RODs
and historical information on FY 1982-1989
RODs. The report should be used as a reference
document. To ensure ease of reference, the
material in this report is divided into the
following sections:
• Introduction - highlights accomplishments
in the remedial program, and compliance
with CERCLA and the NCP
• FY 1989 ROD Abstracts - describes site
conditions, key contaminants, selected
remedial actions, specific performance
standards and goals, institutional controls,
remedial action costs, operation and
maintenance costs, and site-specific
keywords for each FY 1989 ROD
FY 1989 ROD Summary Table - provides
the remedial action number (e.g., 1st, 2nd,
etc.), and summarizes the contaminants by
media, estimated waste volume, major
components of the selected remedy,
cleanup goals for key contaminants,
present worth or capital costs, and
operation and maintenance costs for each
FY 1989 ROD
• FY 1982-1988 ROD Summary Table -
provides the remedial action location and
date, and summarizes the contaminants by
media, estimated waste volume, major
components of the selected remedy,
cleanup goals for key contaminants,
-------
present worth or capital costs, and
operation and maintenance costs for each
FY 1982-1988 ROD
ROD Keyword List - provides a summary
listing under each keyword of all RODs
that have an association with the keyword
based on the selected remedial action. A
keyword list index located at the
beginning of the section provides an
overview of all keyword categories within
the list.
-------
Exhibit 1
FY 1989 ROD TECHNOLOGY SUMMARY
a
SOURCE CONTROL REMEDIATION
Treatment Technology1*'0
Incineration/Thermal Treatment
Solidification/Stabilization
Vacuum/Vapor Extraction
Biodegradation/Land Application
Soil Washing/Flushing
Solvent Extraction
Volatilization/Soil Aeration
Other/Not Specified Treatment Technologies
Containment Only
Onsite
Offsite
TOTAL NUMBER OF OCCURRENCES
NON-SOURCE CONTROL REMEDIATION
TECHNOLOGY SELECTIONS
Pump and Treat
Alternate Water Supply
Other (e.g., Natural Attenuation)
Leachate Treatment
Includes final and interim action RODs; more than one remedy may be associated with a ROD.
b Categorized by principal treatment technology; treatments used as subsequent components of a treatment
inclu
train are not included.
0 Data reflect occurrences of technologies as selected in the 76 source control RODs that used treatment as
the principal remedy; more than one technology may be associated with a ROD.
-------
Exhibit 2
OCCURRENCES OF TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
IN FY 1989 SOURCE CONTROL REMEDIES a'b
Volatilization/
Soil Washing/ Soil Aeration (4)
Flushing (6)
Solvent Extraction (6)
Other/Not
Specified (9)
Biodegradation/
Land Application (10)
Incineration/
Thermal
Treatment (30)
Solidification/
Stabilization (18)
Vacuum/Vapor
Extraction (17)
OCCURRENCES
IN RODs
30
18
17
10
6
6
4
100*
PERCENT
30%
18%
17%
10%
6%
6%
4%
9%
100%
TYPES
Incineration/Thermal Treatment
Solidification/Stabilization
Vacuum/Vapor Extraction
Biodegradation/Land Application
Soil Washing/Flushing
Solvent Extraction
Volatilization/Soil Aeration
Other/Not Specified Treatment Technologies
* Includes final and interim action RODs.
b Data reflect occurrences of technologies as selected in the 76 source control RODs that used treatment as the
principal remedy; more than one technology may be associated with a ROD.
-------
Exhibits
FY 1989 SOURCE CONTROL REMEDIES
CATEGORIZED BY FINAL AND INTERIM ACTIONS9
WE pf SOUHCe CONffiOi
Treatment Technologies
Incineration/Thermal
Treatment
Solidification/Stabilization
Vacuum/Vapor Extraction
Volatilization/Soil Aeration
Soil Washing/Flushing
Biodegradation/Land
Application
Solvent Extraction
Other/Not Specified
Treatment Technologies
Containment Only
Onsite
Offsite
Occurrences in Final
Source Control RODs
81
24b
15
14
4
6
8
5
5
26
21
5
Occurrences in Interim
Source Control RODs :
19
6
3
3
0
0
2
1
4
5
3
2
Total
Occurr-
ences
100
30
18
17
4
6
10
6
i 9
31
24
7
aData reflect occurrences of technologies selected in the 76 source control RODs that selected treatment as the principal
remedy; more than one remedy may be associated with a ROD.
b Includes two RODs that selected in-situ vitrification (Ionia City Landfill, Ml and Northwest Transformer, WA).
-------
Exhibit 4
OCCURRENCES OF TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES IN
FINAL AND INTERIM SOURCE CONTROL REMEDIES3
35 --
30 --
25 -'
•t O 20
zo
10
5
30
Final Source Control
Interim Source Control
10
Incineration/ Solidification/ Vacuum/
Thermal Stabilization Vapor
Treatment Extraction
Volatilization/ Soil Washing/ BiodegradatiorV Solvent Other/Not
Soil Aeration Flushing Land Application Extraction Specified
Treatment Technology
* Data reflect occurrences of technologies as selected in the 76 source control RODs that used treatment as
the principal remedy; more than one remedy may be associated with a ROD.
-------
Exhibit 5
INDEX OF SITE REMEDIES FOR FY 1989
SOURCE CONTROL"
TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
Incineration/Thermal Treatment (30)
REGION SITE NAME. STATE
I Baird & McGuire, MA
I Pinette's Salvage Yard, M E°
I Wells G&H, MA°
I * W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MAC
II Bog Creek Farm, NJ
II De Rewal Chemical, NJC
II * FAA Technical Center, NJ°
II Fulton Terminals, NY
III Douglassville Disposal, PA
III M .W. Manufacturing, PA
111 Whitmoyer Laboratories, PAb
IV Aberdeen Pesticides/Fairway Six, NC
IV American Creosote Works, TN°
IV * Celanese (Shelby Fiber Operations), NC°
IV Newsom Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS
IV Smith's Farm, KY°
V * Alsco Anaconda, OHC
V * Big D Campground, OH
V * Cliffs/Dow Dump, Ml"
V Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), ILC
V * Ionia City Landfill, Ml
V Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH
V * New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN
V Ninth Avenue Dump, IN
V Outboard Marine (Amendment), ILb
V Wedzeb Enterprises, IN
VII * Vogel Paint & Wax, IAW
VIII * Sand Creek Industrial, CO0
VIII * Woodbury Chemical, CO
X * Northwest Transformer, WA
Solidification/Stabilization (18)
I
I
M
II
III
III
III
IV
Sullivan's Ledge, MA
W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MAC
De Rewal Chemical, NJ°
Marathon Battery, NY
Craig Farm Drum, PA
Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard, PA
Ordnance Works Disposal Areas
(Amendment), WVC
Amnicola Dump, TN
* Enforcement-lead RODs.
a RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
b ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
c ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d ROD selected two non-source control measures.
9
-------
Exhibit 5
INDEX OF SITE REMEDIES FOR FY 1989
(Continued)
Solidification/Stabilization (18)
(Continued)
IV
IV
IV
V
V
V
VI
IX
IX
IX
Celanese (Shelby Fiber Operations), NCC
Kassouf-Kimerling, FL
Smith's Farm, KYC
Auto Ion Chemicals, Ml
MIDCO I, IN0
MIDCOII, IN
Pesses Chemical, TX
Coast Wood Preserving, CA
Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA°
Purity Oil Sales, CA
Vacuum/Vapor Extraction (17)
I
I
I
II
V
V
V
V
VII
VIII
IX
IX
IX
IX
DC
DC
IX
Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT
South Municipal Water Supply Well, NH
Wells G&H, MAC
FAA Technical Center, NJ°
Kysor Industrial, Ml
Miami County Incinerator, OH
MIDCO I, IN°
Wausau Water Supply (9/29/89), Wl
Hastings Ground Water, NE
Sand Creek Industrial, COC
Fairchild Semiconductor (Mt. View), CAC
(1st Remedial Action)
Fairchild Semiconductor (Mt. View), CA°
(2nd Remedial Action)
Fairchild Semiconductor (S San Jose), CA
IBM (San Jose Plant), CA
Intel (Mt. View Plant), CAC
Litchfield Airport Area, AZ
Raytheon (Mt. View Plant), CAC
Biodegradation/Land Application (10)
IV
V
V
VI
VII
VIII
VIII
IX
Ordnance Works Disposal Areas
(Amendment), WV°
Whitmoyer Laboratories, PAb
American Creosote Works, FL
Cliffs/Dow Dump, Mlc
Galesburg/Koppers, IL
Sheridan Disposal Services (12/29/88), TX
Vogel Paint & Wax, IAb-d
Burlington Northern (Somers Plant), MT
Libby Ground Water, MT
Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA°
Soil Washing/Flushing (6)
IV
V
IX
Byron Barrel & Drum, NY
Vineland Chemical, NJc(Soil Washing)
Vineland Chemical, NJ°(Soil Flushing)
Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC
Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL°
Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA°
* Enforcement-lead RODs.
8 RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
b ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
c ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d ROD selected two non-source control measures.
10
-------
Exhibit 5
INDEX OF SITE REMEDIES FOR FY 1989
(Continued)
Solvent Extraction (6)
V
VI
Norwood RGBs, MA
O'Connor, ME
Pinette's Salvage Yard, MEC
Ewan Property, NJC
Outboard Marine (Amendment), ILb
United Creosoting, TX
Volatilization/Soil Aeration (4)
IX
IX
IX
IX
Fairchild Semiconductor (Mt. View), CA°
(1st Remedial Action)
Fairchild Semiconductor (Mt. View), CA°
(2nd Remedial Action)
Intel (Mt. View Plant), CA°
Raytheon (Mt. View Plant), CAC
Other/Not Specified Treatment
Technologies (9)
III
III
IV
V
VII
VII
Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME
Claremont Polychemical, NY
SMS Instruments (Deer Park), NY
Havertown PCP, PA
Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking, PA
American Creosote Works, TN°
Alsco Anaconda, OH°
Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS
Findett, MO
CONTAINMENT ONLY
Onsite (24)
II
II
III
III
IV
V
V
V
V
V
VI
VII
VII
IX
IX
IX
IX
X
X
Auburn Road Landfill, NH
Chemical Insecticide, NJ
Clothier Disposal, NY
North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY
Pepe Field, NJ
Port Washington Landfill, NY
Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA
Henderson Road, PA
Wildcat Landfill, DE
Chemtronics (Amendment), NC
Bowers Landfill, OHd
E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH
Industrial Excess Landfill, OH
Wauconda Sand and Gravel, IL
Windom Dump, MN
Motco, TX
Cherokee County, KS
Todtz, Lawrence Farm, IA
Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA
Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA
Nineteenth Avenue Landfill, AZ
South Bay Asbestos Area, CA
Comm Bay Near Shore/Tide Flats, WAd
Northside Landfill, WAd
* Enforcement-lead RODs.
a RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
b ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
0 ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d ROD selected two non-source control measures.
11
-------
Exhibit 5
INDEX OF SITE REMEDIES FOR FY 1989
(Continued)
Offsite (7)
II
II
V
VII
VIII
IX
X
Glen Ridge Radium, NJ
Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ
Bowers Landfill, OHd
Kem-Pest Laboratories, MO
Monticello Vicinity Properties, UT
Beckman Instruments, CA
Comm Bay Near Shore/Tide Flats, WAd
NON-SOURCE CONTROL
Pump and Treatment (20)
II
II
IV
IV
IV
IV
V
V
V
V
V
VII
VII
IX
IX
IX
Caldwell Trucking, NJ
Ciba-Geigy, NJ
Picatinny Arsenal, NJ
Preferred Plating, NY
Bally Ground Water, PA
Kimberton, PA
Carolawn, SC
Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek Plant), AL
Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL
Sydney Mine Sludge Ponds, FL
Hedblum Industries, Ml
Northernaire Plating, Ml
Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, Ml
Waite Park Wells, MN
Wausau Water Supply (12/23/88), Wl
Chemplex, IA
Solid State Circuits, MO
Firestone Tire (Salinas Plant), CA
Sacramento Army Depot, CA
San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA
Pump and Treatment in Addition to
a Source Control Remedy (47)
II
II
III
IV
Auburn Road Landfill, NH
Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT
Norwood PCBs, MA
O'Connor, MEC
Pinette's Salvage Yard, MEC
South Municipal Water Supply, NH
Sullivan's Ledge, MA
Wells G&H, MA°
Bog Creek Farm, NJ
Byron Barrel & Drum, NY
Ewan Property, NJ
FAA Technical Center, NJ
Fulton Terminals, NY
Port Washington Landfill, NY
SMS Instruments (Deer Park), NY
Vineland Chemical, NJ
Craig Farm Drum, PA
Douglassville Disposal, PA
Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC
* Enforcement-lead RODs.
8 RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
b ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
0 ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d ROD selected two non-source control measures.
12
-------
Exhibit 5
INDEX OF SITE REMEDIES FOR FY 1989
(Continued)
Pump and Treatment in Addition to
a Source Control Remedy (47)
(Continued)
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
VI
VII
VII
VIII
VIII
IX
IX
IX
IX
IX
IX
IX
IX
IX
IX
IX
X
Big D Campground, OH
Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL°
Galesburg/Koppers, IL
Industrial Excess Landfill, OH
Kysor Industrial, Ml
Miami County Incinerator, OHd
MIDCO I, IN0
MIDCOII, IN
Ninth Avenue Dump, IN
Wausau Water Supply (9/29/89), Wl
Motco, TX
Findett, MO
Vogel Paint & Wax, IAb-d
Burlington Northern (Somers Plant), MT
Libby Ground Water, MTd
Beckman Instruments, CA
Coast Wood Preserving, CA
Fairchild Semiconductor (Mt. View), CA °
(1st Remedial Action)
Fairchild Semiconductor (Mt. View), CAC
(2nd Remedial Action)
Fairchild Semiconductor (S San Jose), CA
IBM (San Jose Plant), CA
Intel (Mt. View Plant), CA°
Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA
Litchfield Airport Area, AZ
Purity Oil Sales, CAd
Raytheon (Mt. View Plant), CAC
Northside Landfill, WA
Alternate Water Supply (4)
III
III
III
V
Croydon TCE, PA
CryoChem, PA
Strasburg Landfill, PAd
Byron Salvage Yard, IL
Alternate Water Supply in Addition
to a Source Control and/or Pump and
Treatment Remedy (4)
V
IX
X
De Rewal, NJC
Miami County Incinerator, OHd
Purity Oil Sales, CAd
Northside Landfill, WAd
Other Ground Water Remedies
(Natural Attenuation) (2)
III
VI
New Castle Spill, DE
Sheridan Disposal Services (09/27/89), TX
OTHER NON-SOURCE
CONTROL REMEDIES
Leachate Treatment (1)
Strasburg Landfill, PAd
* Enforcement-lead RODs.
a RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
b ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
0 ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d ROD selected two non-source control measures.
13
-------
Exhibit 5
INDEX OF SITE REMEDIES FOR FY 1989
(Continued)
Leachate Treatment in
Addition to Source Control
Remedy (6)
II
III
IV
IV
V
VII
Pepe Field, NJ
Henderson Road, PA
American Creosote Works, FL
Smith's Farm, KYC
E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH
Vogel Paint & Wax, IAW
NO. FURTHER ACTION (12)
II
II
III
IV
V
V
V
V
VI
VI
VII
VII
BEC Trucking, NY
Vine land State School, NJ
Reeser's Landfill, PA
Ciba-Geigy (Mclntosh Plant), AL
Adrian Municipal Well Field, MN
Cemetary Dump, Ml
New Brighton/Arden Hills (Amendment),
MN
Whitehall Municipal Wells, Ml
Homestake Mining, NM
South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM
Arkansas City Dump, KS
John's Sludge Pond, KS
* Enforcement-lead RODs.
« RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
° ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
0 ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d ROD selected two non-source control measures.
14
-------
Exhibit 6
DESCRIPTION OF TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY CATEGORIES
TREOTEHT TECHNOLOGY DESCRIPTION
INCINERATION/
THERMAL
TREATMENT
SOLIDIFICATION/
STABILIZATION
VACUUM/VAPOR
EXTRACTION
VOLATILIZATION/
SOIL AERATION
SOIL WASHING/
FLUSHING
Thermal destruction treatments use high temperature processes to destroy or detoxify hazardous
waste, encompassing such technologies as incineration, pyrolysis, and wet oxidation. Incineration is
a combustion process, producing COfe, HaO vapor, S0a NOx, HCI gases, and ash. Specific
incineration types include rotary kiln, liquid injection, fluidized-bed, and infrared treatment. Pyrolysis
decomposes organics in an oxygen deficient atmosphere. Wet oxidation employs high pressure and
temperature in a water solution or suspension to destroy organics. Vitrification is another high
temperature treatment which destroys organic compounds and immobilizes inorganics in a glass melt.
Solidification/stabilization facilitates a chemical or physical reduction of the mobility of hazardous
constituents, The solidification/stabilization procedures may occur in situ, in tanks, or in containers
and will improve the physical characteristics of the material, decrease the surface area across which
transfer of contaminants can occur, limit the solubilities, or reduce toxicity of the contaminants.
Solidification generally produces a durable monolithic block of waste. Stabilization usually involves
the addition and mixing of materials that limit the solubility or mobility of the waste constituents even
though the physical characteristics of the waste may not be changed. Types of solidification/
stabilization treatment can be categorized further by the primary stabilizing agent used:
cement-based, pozzolanic- or silicate-based, thermoplastic-based, or organic polymer-based.
In-situ vacuum/vapor extraction is used to remove volatile organic compounds from soil. The system
operates by applying a vacuum through production wells, forcing VOCs in the soil to diffuse into the
production wells. As the VOC-contaminated air is withdrawn for treatment, fresh air is simultaneously
drawn down from the soil surface into the soil.
A similar system involves a series of air injection and air extraction wells. Fresh air is forced into the
injection wells and VOC-contaminated air is withdrawn through the extraction wells.
In volatilization/soil aeration, soil is excavated and aerated in a mill or drum, causing VOCs to
volatilize. The air containing VOCs is subsequently collected and treated.
Soil washing extracts contaminants from excavated soil and sludge using a liquid medium, such as
water, organic solvents, water/chelating agents, water/surfactants, acids, or bases. Soil flushing is
applied in situ using an injection/recirculation system. In both systems, the washing solution is treated
for removal of the contaminants via a conventional wastewater treatment system.
15
-------
Exhibit 6
DESCRIPTION OF TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY CATEGORIES
(Continued)
TECHNOLOGY
CATEGORY
BIODEGRADATON/
LAND
APPLICATION
SOLVENT
EXTRACTION
Biodegradation uses micro-organisms to detoxify organic matter. There are several types of
Wodegradation applications, including composting, in-situ, solid phase, and slurry phase, which may
occur in an aerobic or anaerobic atmosphere. Treatment may be accelerated by adjusting
temperature, or supplying nutrients and/or oxygen.
f r r f
-------
Exhibit 7
FY 1989 ROD REMEDY COST a
o -
44
23
23
20
19
TOTAL
HODS
SIGNED
143
3 Estimates are based on present worth costs when available.
b Data are not available for seven RODs.
17
-------
Exhibit 8
RODS SIGNED PER FISCAL YEAR
Number
of
RODS
82 83 84 85 86
Fiscal Year
87 88
RODS SIGNED PER FISCAL YEAR PER REGION
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1
3
3 ;
7
6
5
n
11
i
2
7
13
15
15
22
23
1
2
5 ,
10
15 s
5
26
18
1 ,
0
0
5
13'
11
12
15
*-0
2
9
20
16
14
25
32
0
0
* \
5
'6 ;
11
21
7
0
1
2
1
2
3
12
11
0
0
1
2
7
7
4
5
0
2
5
3
0
5
13
18
1 0
1
£
3
$
1
7
3
4
13
38
•* s'
69
83
77a
153*
143°
Total 580
11 Contains one ROD Amendment: Picillo Farm, Rl 03/03/87 amends the 09/30/85 ROD.
b Contains one ROD Amendment: Tyson's Dump, PA 03/31/88 amends the 12/21/84 ROD.
0 Contains four ROD Amendments: Ordnance Works, WV 09/29/89 amends the 03/31/88 ROD; Chemtronics, NC
04/26/89 amends the 04/05/88 ROD; Outboard Marine, IL 03/31/89 amends the 05/15/84 ROD; and
New Brighton/Arden Hills (Well #7), MN 08/11/89 amends the 06/30/86 ROD.
18
-------
Exhibit 9
OCCURRENCES OF SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT
TECHNOLOGIES PER FISCAL YEAR8
120 -
100 -
80 -
Number of
Treatment
Technology 60 -
Occurrences
40 -
20-
82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89
Fiscal Year
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
0
0
3
7
n
13
26
30
1 - ,
0
1
2
9
9
18s
18
, 0
0
0
1
®,,,
i
10
17
0
0
%0
2
4
2
6
4
0
0
0
2
2
2
6 ,
6
0
0
1
1
3
1
6
10
s fr
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
4
4
9
1 ,,
0
5 -
15
3G\
32
n -
100
Total 259
* Technologies titles in bold denote innovative technologies.
a Data reflect occurrences of technologies as selected in the 76 source control RODs that selected treatment as
the principal remedy; more than one remedy may be associated with a ROD.
19
-------
Exhibit 10
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
SELECTED IN FY 1982-1989 RODS
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
TECHNOLOGIES8
REGION SITE NAME. STATE
FY82
FY83
FY84
Solidification/Stabilization (1)
III
Bruin Lagoon, PA
Incineration/Thermal Treatment (3)
Solidification/Stabilization (1)
Biodegradation/Land Application (1)
V
V
X
VI
VI
Berlin & Farro, Ml
tl_askin/Poplar, OH
"Western Processing, WA
Bioecology, TX
Old Inger, LA
FY85
Incineration/Thermal Treatment (7)
Solidification/Stabilization (2)
Vacuum/Vapor Extraction (1)
Biodegradation/Land Application (1)
Soil Washing/Flushing (2)
Volatilization/Soil Aeration (2)
II Bog Creek Farm, NJ
II Bridgeport, NJ
II Swope Oil, NJ
V Acme Solvents, IL
VI Motco, TX
VI Triangle Chemical, TX
VIII Woodbury Chemical, CO
II Wide Beach, NY
IV Davie Landfill, FL
V Verona Well Field, Ml
V Byron/Johnson Salvage, IL
II Goose Farm, NJ
X South Tacoma/Well 12-A, WA
I McKin, ME
VI Triangle Chemical, TX
* Enforcement-lead RODs.
*RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
20
-------
Exhibit 10
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
SELECTED IN FY 1982-1989 RODS
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
TECHNOLOGIES*
REGION SITE NAME. STATE
FY86
Incineration/Thermal Treatment (12)
Solidification/Stabilization (9)
Biodegradation/Land Application (3)
Soil Washing/Flushing (2)
Volatilization/Soil Aeration (4)
I Baird & McGuire, MA
II * Hyde Park, NY
III Drake, PA
III Westline, PA
IV Coleman Evans, FL b
IV Mowbray Engineering, AL
V Arrowhead Refinery, MN
V Fields Brook, OH°
V LaSalle Electrical, IL
V Metamora Landfill, Ml
V Spiegelberg Landfill, Ml
VI Sikes Disposal Pit, TX
II Marathon Battery, NY
III Bruin Lagoon, PA fa
IV Mowbray Engineering, AL
IV * Pepper's Steel, FL
IV Sapp Battery, FL
V Burrows Sanitation, Ml
V Fields Brook, OH°
V ^Forest Waste, Ml
X * Queen City Farms, WA
I Tinkham Garage, NHb
III t Leetown Pesticide, WV
V * Burlington Northern, MN
I Tinkham Garage, NHb
X United Chrome, OR
I Tinkham Garage, NH
II Caldwell Trucking, NJ
II Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ
IV Hollingsworth Solderless, FL
* Enforcement-lead RODs.
* RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
° ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
c ROD selected two source control treatment technologies.
21
-------
Exhibit 10
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
SELECTED IN FY 1982-1989 RODS
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
FY87
TECHNOLOGIES8
REGION SITE NAME. STATE
Incineration/Thermal Treatment (13)
Solidification/Stabilization (9)
Vacuum Extraction (1)
Biodegradation/Land Application (1)
Soil Washing/Flushing (2)
Volatilization/Soil Aeration (2)
Other Treatment Technologies (4)
I Davis Liquid Waste, Rl
I *Ottati&Goss,NH°
II Williams Property, NJ
IV *Geiger(C&MOil),SC
IV *Sodyeco, NC
IV Tower Chemical, FL
V Laskin/Poplar, OH
V Rose Township, Ml
VI Bayou Bonfouca, LA
VI Cleve Reber, LA
VI *GurleyPit, ARC
VI * Hardage/Criner, OK
VI Sand Springs petrochemical
Complex, OK
II Chemical Control, NJ
IV *Geiger(C&MOil),SC
IV * Gold Coast, FL
IV Independent Nail, SC
V Liquid Disposal Landfill, Ml
V * Northern Engraving, Wl
VI *GurleyPit, ARC
VI * Mid-South, AR
VI Sand SpringscPetrochemical
Complex, OK
V * Seymour, IN
II *Renora, Inc., NJ
I Davis Liquid Waste, Rl°
IV Palmetto Wood, SC
I *Ottati&Goss, NH°
II * Waldick Aerospace, NJ
I Resolve, MA
III * Palmerton Zinc, PA
III * West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV
VIII Central City/Clear Creek, CO
* Enforcement-lead RODs.
"RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
b ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
0 ROD selected two source control treatment technologies.
22
-------
Exhibit 10
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
SELECTED IN FY 1982-1989 RODS
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE TECHNOLOGIES8 REGION SITE NAME. STATE
FY88
Incineration/Thermal Treatment (26)
Solidification/Stabilization (18)
II
II
III
III
HI
III
III
III
III
IV
V
V
V
V
VI
VI
VII
VII
VII
VIII
II
II
II
III
III
IV
IV
V
V
VI
VI
VII
VII
IX
X
X
X
* Enforcement-lead RODs.
RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
b
* Rose Disposal Pit, MA
Brewster Well Field, NY
Ewan Property, NJ
Lipari Landfill, NJ
Love Canal (10/26/87), NY
Reich Farms, NJ
York Oil, NY*
Berk Sand Pits, PA
Delaware Sand & Gravel, DE
Douglassville Disposal, PA
Drake Chemical, PA
Fike Chemical, WV
* Ordnance Works Disposal,
Southern Maryland Wood, MD
Wildcat Landfill, DE
Zellwood, FL°
Forest Waste Disposal, Ml
Fort Wayne, IN
LaSalle Electrical, IL
Summit National, OH
* Brio Refining, TX
Old Midland Products, AR
Minker Stout/Romaine, MO
* Syntex Verona, MO
Times Beach, MO
* Broderick Wood, CO
Love Canal (09/26/88) NY
Marathon Battery, NY
York Oil, NY°
Aladdin, PA
Fike Chemical, WV
* Chemtronics, NC
* Flowood, MS
Mid-State Disposal, Wl
Velsicol Chemical, IL
* Bailey Waste Disposal, TX
* Industrial Waste Control, AR
Arkansas City Dump, KS
Midwest Manufacturing, IA
* Selma Pressure Treating, CA
* Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA
Frontier Hard Chrome (12/30/87), WA
* Gould, OR
* Pacific Hide & Fur, WA
.
ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
ROD selected two source control treatment technologies.
Use of this treatment at the site was retracted in a FY 1989 ROD Amendment.
23
-------
Exhibit 10
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
SELECTED IN FY 1982-1989 RODS
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
FY88
TECHNOLOGIES'
Vacuum Extraction (10)
REGION SITE NAME. STATE
Groveland Well, MA
Keefe Environmental, NH c
*Bendix Flight Systems, PA
* Tyson's Dump (Amendment), PA
*Airco, KY
* Goodrich, B.F., KY
* South Valley (PL-83), NM
Hastings (09/28/88), NE
Hastings (09/30/88), NE
* Motorola, AZ
Biodegradation/Land Application (6)
Soil Washing/Flushing (6)
Volatilization/Soil Aeration (6)
Other Treatment Technologies (4)
IV
IV
VI
VII
VII
IX
I
III
IV
VI
VI
VI
III
IV
V
V
VI
VI
III
IV
VI
V
VI
VII
Iron Horse Park, MA
L.A. Clarke & Son, VA°
* Brown Wood Preserving, FL
*Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM
French Limited, TX
North Cavalcade, TX
L.A. Clarke & Son, VA°
Zellwood, FLC
United Scrap Lead, OH
*U.S. Aviex, Ml
* Koppers/Texarkana, TX
* South Cavalcade, TX
Cannon Engineering, MA
Marathon Battery, NY°
Reich Farms, NJ5 c
*Bendix Flight Systems, PA
*Wamchem, SC
Long Prairie, MN
*GE Wiring, PR
Pristine, OH
Sol Lynn (03/25/88), TX
*Fulbright, MO
* Enforcement-lead RODs.
" RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures. ,,„„,„„:»,.
b ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
0 ROD selected two source control treatment technologies.
24
-------
Exhibit 10
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
SELECTED IN FY1982-1989 RODs
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
FY89
TECHNOLOGIESa
Incineration/Thermal Treatment (30)
REGION SITE NAME. STATE
I Baird & McGuire, MA
I Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME0
I Wells G&H, MA°
I * W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA°
II Bog Creek Farm, NJ
11 De Rewal Chemical, NJC
II * FAA Technical Center, NJ°
II Fulton Terminals, NY
III * Douglassville Disposal, PA
III M.W. Manufacturing, PA
111 Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA"
IV Aberdeen Pesticides/Fairway Six
NC
IV American Creosote Works, TNC
IV * Celanese (Shelby Fiber
Operations), NC°
IV Newsom Brothers/Old Reichhold,
MS
IV Smith's Farm, KY°
V * Alsco Anaconda, OH°
V * Big D Campground, OH
V * Cliffs/Dow Dump, Mlc
V Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL°
V * Ionia City Landfill, Ml
V Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH
V * New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP),
MN
V Ninth Avenue Dump, IN
V Outboard Marine (Amendment), ILb
V Wedzeb Enterprises, IN
VII * Vogel Paint & Wax, IAb'd
VIII * Sand Creek Industrial, CO0
VIII * Woodbury Chemical, CO
X * Northwest Transformer, WA
Solidification/Stabilization (18)
I
I
II
Sullivan's Ledge, MA
W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA°
De Rewal Chemical, NJC
Marathon Battery, NY
* Enforcement-lead RODs.
* RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
° ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies
c ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
d ROD selected two non-source control measures.
25
-------
Exhibit 10
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
SELECTED IN FY1982-1989 RODS
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
FY89
TECHNOLOGIES3
Solidification/Stabilization (18)
(Continued)
REGION SITE NAME. STATE
III * Craig Farm Drum, PA
111 Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard, PA
III * Ordnance Works Disposal Areas
(Amendment), WVC
IV Amnicola Dump, TN
IV * Celanese (Shelby Fiber
Operations), NC°
IV Kassouf-Kimerling, FL
IV Smith's Farm, KYC
V Auto Ion Chemicals, Ml
V MIDCO I, IN0
V MIDCO II, IN
VI Pesses Chemical, TX
IX Coast Wood Preserving, CA
IX Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA°
IX Purity Oil Sales, CA
Vacuum/Vapor Extraction (17)
I
I
II
V
V
V
V
VII
VIII
IX
IX
IX
IX
IX
IX
IX
Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT
South Municipal Water Supply Well,
NH
Wells G&H, MA°
FAA Technical Center, NJ°
Kysor Industrial, Ml
Miami County Incinerator, OH
MIDCO I, IN0
Wausau Water Supply (9/29/89), Wl
Hastings Ground Water, NE
Sand Creek Industrial, CO0
Fairchild Semiconductor (Mt. View),
CA° (1st Remedial Action)
Fairchild Semiconductor (Mt. View),
CAC (2nd Remedial Action)
Fairchild Semiconductor (S. San
Jose), CA
IBM (San Jose Plant), CA
Intel (Mt. View Plant), CA°
Litchfield Airport Area, AZ
Raytheon (Mt. View Plant), CAC
* Enforcement-lead RODs.
a RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures. _
b ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies.
e ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
* ROD selected two non-source control measures.
26
-------
Exhibit 10
SOURCE CONTROL TREATMENT TECHNOLOGIES
SELECTED IN FY1982-1989 RODs
(Continued)
FISCAL YEAR OF
ROD SIGNATURE
FY89
TECHNOLQGIESa REGION
Biodegradation/Land Application (10) III
III
IV
V
V
VI
VII
VIII
Soil Washing/Flushing (6)
Solvent Extraction (6)
Volatilization/Soil Aeration (4)
Other/Not Specified Treatment
Technologies (9)
VIII
IX
II
IV
V
IX
I
I
I
II
V
VI
IX
IX
IX
IX
III
IV
V
VII
VII
SITE NAME. STATE
* Ordnance Works Disposal Areas
(Amendment), WVC
Whitmoyer Laboratories, PAb
American Creosote Works, FL
* Cliffs/Dow Dump, Ml0
Galesburg/Koppers, IL
* Sheridan Disposal Services
(12/29/88), TX
* Vogel Paint & Wax, IAb-d
* Burlington Northern (Somers
Plant), MT
* Libby Ground Water, MT
* Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA°
Byron Barrel & Drum, NY
Vineland Chemical, NJ°(Soil Washing)
Vineland Chemical, NJ°(Soil Flushing)
Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC
Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL°
" Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA°
Norwood PCBs, MA
k O'Connor, ME
Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME0
Ewan Property, NJ
Outboard Marine (Amendment), ILb
United Creosoting, TX
Fairchild Semiconductor (Mt. View),
CAC (1 st Remedial Action)
Fairchild Semiconductor (Mt. View),
CAC (2nd Remedial Action)
Intel (Mt. View Plant), CAC
Raytheon (Mt. View Plant), CAC
Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME
Claremont Polychemical, NY
SMS Instruments (Deer Park), NY
Havertown PCP, PA
Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking, PA
American Creosote Works, TN°
Alsco Anaconda, OH°
Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS
Findett, MO
* Enforcement-lead RODs.
* RODs may contain non-source control remediation measures.
b ROD allows for implementation of one of two source control treatment technologies
0 ROD selected two or more source control treatment technologies.
° ROD selected two non-source control measures.
27
-------
Exhibit 11
OVERVIEW OF FINAL AND INTERIM SOURCE CONTROL
ACTION TREATMENT REMEDIES FOR FY1987-1989
00
A.) UNIVERSE OF SOURCE
CONTROL RODS
Source Control
RODs (Final &
Interim Action)
(B.) DATA REPRESENTS A
SUBSET OF COLUMN A
RODs Selecting One
or More Treatment
Technologies for
Source Control
27
69
76
Occurrences of
Treatment
Technologies
Selected for Source.
Control
32
76
100
(C.) DATA REPRESENTS A
SUBSET OF COLUMN B
RODs Selecting
Innovative Treatment
Technologies for
Source Control
7a
28 b
40°
Occurrences of
innovative Treatment
Technologies
Selected for Source
Control
7a
30 b
ACC
45
a Includes Resolve, MA, which selected dechlorination of soil.
° IncluS foniS LSSKvS^f^t^Bt, WA, which selected in-situ vitrification; SMS Instruments, NY, which selected in-situ steam stripping;
CelanXe NC Ach selected chemicalI Sonof predominantly organic waste; and Fulton Terminals, NY, which selected low temperature thermal treatment.
-------
Exhibit 12
FY 1982-1989 ROD REMEDY COST
a
1982
1983
1984
1985b
1986
1987
1988
1989
TOTAL
0-$2M
2
8
18
23
31
25
43
44
194
2<1<$5M !
1
2
12
16
14
22
44
23
134
5.1 * $10M
1
2
3
11
11
12
31
23
94
10,1 - $20M
0
1
3
9
13
6
15
20
67
20.1 - $30M
0
0
2
4
6
5
14
7
38
$30.1 M+
0
0
0
3
8
5°
6
19
41
TOTAL
RODs
SIGNED
4
13
38
69
83
77
153
143d
580d
a Estimates are based on present worth costs when available.
b Data are not available for three sites (Harris Farley, TX and two Westinghouse, IN sites that are confidential).
0 Includes a combined remedial cost for the Envirochem, IN and Northside, IN, which are both represented in one ROD.
d Data are not available for seven FY 1989 RODs.
29
-------
-------
SECTION
RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
ROD summaries are arranged alphabetically by Region. The States in each
Region are listed at the beginning of each Region; however, not .all States
have had a ROD signed in FY 1989.
Each ROD summary presented in this section consists of the following:
ROD Abstract - summarizing site location and background
information, contaminated media, key contaminants, selected
remedial action, and present worth or capital costs and O&M
costs.
Performance Standards or Goals - describing
qualitative/quantitative cleanup criteria.
• Institutional Controls - describing ordered site restrictions.
Keywords - highlighting treatment technologies, contaminated
media, key contaminants, and major keyword categories for the
RODs. A list of RODs by keywords is presented in the last
section of this document.
31
-------
RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
FY1989
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SITE NAME/STATE
REGION I
Auburn Road Landfill, NH
Baird & McGuire, MA
Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT
Norwood PCBs, MA
O'Connor, ME
Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME
Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME
South Municipal Water Supply Well, NH
Sullivan's Ledge, MA
W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA
Wells G&H, MA
REGION II
EEC Trucking, NY
Bog Creek Farm, NJ
Byron Barrel & Drum, NY
Caldwell Trucking, NJ
Chemical Insecticide, NJ
Ciba-Geigy, NJ
Claremont Polychemical, NY
Clothier Disposal, NY
De Rewal Chemical, NJ
Ewan Property, NJ
FAA Technical Center, NJ
Fulton Terminals, NY
Glen Ridge Radium Site, NJ
Marathon Battery, NY
Montclair/West Orange Radium Site, NJ
North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY
Pcpe Field, NJ
Picatinny Arsenal, NJ
Port Washington Landfill, NY
Preferred Plating, NY
SMS Instruments (Deer Park), NY
Vineland Chemical, NJ
Vineland State School, NJ
REGION HI
Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA
Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA
Craig Farm Drum, PA
Croydon TCE, PA
CryoChem, PA
PAGE
36
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
46
47
48
48
49
50
51
52
53
53
54
55
56
57
57
58
59
59
60
61
61
62
64
64
65
66
67
32
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(Continued)
REGION HI (Continued)
Douglassville Disposal, PA
Havertown PCP, PA
Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard, PA
Henderson Road, PA
Kimberton Site, PA
M.W. Manufacturing, PA
New Castle Spill, DE
Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV
Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking, PA
Reeser's Landfill, PA
Strasburg Landfill, PA
Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA
Wildcat Landfill, DE
REGION IV
Aberdeen Pesticide Dumps (Fairway Six), NC
American Creosote Works, TN
American Creosote Works, FL
Amnicola Dump, TN
Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC
Carolawn, SC
Celanese (Shelby Fiber Operations), NC
Chemtronics (Amendment), NC
Ciba-Geigy (Mclntosh Plant), AL
Kassouf-Kimerling Battery, FL
Newsom Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS
Smith's Farm, KY
Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek), AL
Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL
Sydney Mine Sludge Ponds, FL
REGION V
Adrian Municipal Well Field, MN
Alsco Anaconda, OH
Auto Ion Chemicals, MI
Big D Campground, OH
Bowers Landfill, OH
Byron Salvage Yard, IL
Cemetery Dump, MI
Cliffs/Dow Dump, MI
Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL
E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH
Galesburg/Koppers, IL
Hedblum Industries, MI
Industrial Excess Landfill, OH
Ionia City Landfill, MI
Kysor Industrial, MI
67
68
69
70
71
72
72
73
74
74
75
76
77
78
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
85
86
87
87
88
89
91
91
92
92
93
93
94
95
96
96
97
98
99
100
100
33
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(Continued)
REGION V (Continued)
Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH
MIDCO I, IN
MIDCO II, IN
Miami County Incinerator, OH
New Brighton/Arden Hills (Amendment), MN
New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN
Ninth Avenue Dump, IN
Northernaire Plating, MI
Olt/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI
Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL
Waite Park Wells, MN
Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL
Wausau Water Supply, WI
Wausau Water Supply, WI
Wedzeb Enterprises, IN
Whitehall Municipal Wells, MI
Windom Dump, MN
REGION VI
Homestake Mining, MN
Motco, TX
Posses Chemical, TX
Sheridan Disposal Services, TX
Sheridan Disposal Services, TX
South Valley, NM
United Creosoting, TX
REGION VII
Arkansas City Dump, KS
Chemplex, IA.
Cherokee County, KS
Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS
Findett, MO
Hastings Ground Water Contamination, NE
Johns Sludge Pond, KS
Kern-Pest Laboratories, MO
Solid State Circuits, MO
Todtz, Lawrence Farm, IA
Vogel Paint & Wax, IA
REGION VIII
Burlington Northern (Somers Plant), MT
Libby Ground Water Contamination, MT
Monticello Vicinity Properties, UT
Sand Creek Industrial, CO
Woodbury Chemical, CO
101
102
103
104
105
105
106
107
108
109
109
110
111
112
113
113
114
115
115
116
117
118
118
119
121
121
122
123
123
124
125
125
126
126
127
129
130
131
132
133
34
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(Continued)
REGION EC
Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA
Beckman Instruments (Porterville), CA
Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA
Coast Wood Preserving, CA
Fairchild Semiconductor (Mt. View), CA
Fairchild Semiconductor (S. San Jose), CA
Firestone Tire (Salinas Plant), CA
IBM (San Jose Plant), CA
Intel (Mountain View Plant), CA
Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA
Litchfield Airport Area, AZ
Nineteenth Avenue Landfill, AZ
Purity Oil Sales, CA
Raytheon, CA
Sacramento Army Depot, CA
San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA
South Bay Asbestos Area, CA
REGION X
Commencement Bay, Near Shore/Tide Flats, WA
Northside Landfill, WA
Northwest Transformer, WA
134
135
135
136
136
137
138
139
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
145
146
148
149
149
35
-------
RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
REGION I
(Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont)
AUBURN ROAD LANDFILL* NH
Second Remedial Action - Final
September 29, 1989
The Auburn Road Landfill site consists of four
former land disposal areas on 200 acres of land in
Londonderry, Rockingham County, New
Hampshire. The four disposal areas, referred to
as the Old Town Dump (3 acres), the Tire Dump
(4 acres), the Solid Waste Area (6 acres), and the
Septage Lagoon (1 acre), are sources of soil and
ground water contamination at the site. Land
bordering the site is occupied primarily by private
residences, and includes wetlands, streams, and a
pond. In 1979, after verifying that industrial
wastes were being disposed of at the site, the
State prohibited further disposal of drums. Since
1980,69 monitoring wells have been installed and
numerous test pits have been excavated at the
site. In 1986 EPA removed approximately 1,000
drums of waste materials from the site, the
majority being removed from the Old Town
Dump area. The first operable unit for the site
was completed in December 1987, when all
residences identified as being potentially impacted
by site ground water contamination were
connected to a local public water supply.
Concurrently the site owner erected a seven-foot
high fence around the Old Town Dump, the Tire
Dump, and the Solid Waste area. A second drum
removal was conducted in October 1988 when
EPA removed 16 drums from the Old Town
Dump and 300 drums from the Tire Dump. This
Record of Decision (ROD) represents the second
and third operable units for the site and includes
ground water remediation and reducing residual
soil contamination which is a contamination
source to ground water. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil and
ground water are VOCs including benzene,
toluene, TCE, and PCE; and metals including
arsenic and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
downgradient ground water pumping and onsite
treatment using chemical coagulation and
precipitation to remove metal contaminants and
air stripping to remove VOCs (which will be
collected in a vapor phase carbon adsorption
system) followed by onsite discharge to recharge
trenches; ground water monitoring; and placing
a multilayered natural and synthetic cap over each
source area. The estimated present worth cost
for this remedial action is $24,100,000, which
includes annual present worth O&M costs of
$1,460,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Target cleanup levels were selected for ground
water treatment that are consistent with drinking
water standards set by Safe Drinking Water Act
(SDWA) MCLs or proposed MCLs (PMCLS).
Chemical-specific ground water goals include
benzene 5 ug/1 (MCL), toluene 2,000 ug/1
(PMCL), PCE 5 ug/1 (PMCL), TCE 5 ug/1
(MCL), arsenic 50 ug/1 (MCL), and lead 50 ug/1
(MCL). Direct contact, ingestion, and inhalation
of soil contaminants and further migration of
contaminants to ground water will be prevented
by capping.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Arsenic; Benzene;
Capping; Carbon Adsorption; Carcinogenic
Compounds;' Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act;
Closure Requirements; Direct Contact; Drinking
Water Supply; Floodplain; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; Lead; MCLs; Metals; Onsite
Containment; Onsite Discharge; Onsite
Treatment; O&M; PCE; Plume Management;
RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Toluene; VOCs;
Wetlands.
BAIRD & MCGUIRE, MA
Third Remedial Action
September 14, 1989
The Baird & McGuire site is a former chemical
manufacturing facility in northwest Holbrook,
Massachusetts, approximately 14 miles south of
36
-------
Boston. The 20-acre site is situated in a wetland
area within the 100-year floodplain of the
Cochato River which lies to the east. From 1912
to 1983 the company operated a chemical
manufacturing and batching facility on the
property. Manufactured products included
herbicides, pesticides, disinfectants, soaps, floor
waxes, and solvents. Waste disposal methods at
the site included direct discharge into the soil,
nearby brook and wetlands, and a former gravel
pit (now covered) in the eastern portion of the
site. Underground disposal systems were also
used. The South Street well field, part of the
municipal water supply for Holbrook, is within
1,500 feet of the Baird & McGuire property. The
last operating well was shut down in 1982 due to
organic contamination which possibly originated
from the site. EPA conducted a removal action
at the site in 1983 after a waste lagoon
overflowed spreading contaminants into the
Cochato River. The company ceased operating
shortly thereafter. A second removal action was
conducted in 1985, following the discovery of
dioxin contaminated soil. EPA also conducted
an Initial Remedial Measure at the site from 1985
through 1987 which involved constructing a new
water main to direct water away from the site,
removing building structures, and installing a
temporary cap. In 1986 a ROD was signed to
address onsite ground water treatment and
incineration of contaminated soil. This ROD
addresses the Cochato River sediment
contamination. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the sediment are organics
including PAHs and pesticides, and metals
including arsenic.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
placement of river silt curtains downstream of the
site; excavation and onsite incineration of
approximately 1,500 cubic yards of contaminated
sediment; backfilling excavated areas with clean
fill and onsite placement of treated sediment;
restoration of wetland areas; and long-term
surface water and sediment monitoring. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $1,656,000, which includes annual O&M
costs of $22,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Sediment will be treated to a 10"s to 10"* excess
cancer-risk level. Chemical-specific goals include
DDT 19 mg/kg, chlorodane 5 mg/kg, PAHs 22
mg/kg, and arsenic 250 mg/kg. In addition,
environmental exposure to the above
contaminants will be reduced to the mean
Sediment Quality Criteria which are numerical
standards protective of aquatic life and its uses.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; Arsenic;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Air Act; Clean
Water Act; Direct Contact; Excavation; Filling;
Floodplain; Incineration; Metals; Onsite Disposal;
Onsite Treatment; O&M; PAHs; Pesticides;
RCRA; Sediment; Surface Water Monitoring;
Treatment Technology; Wetlands.
KELLOGG-DEERING WELL FIELD, CT
Second Remedial Action
September 29, 1989
The Kellogg-Deering Well Field site is a 10-acre
contaminated municipal well field in Norwalk,
Fairfield County, Connecticut, which includes
adjacent source areas that contribute to the well
field contamination. The site lies within the
Norwalk River's 100-year floodplain and consists
of four municipal drinking water wells that supply
approximately 25 percent of the water for the
45,000 residents in Norwalk. The city detected
elevated TCE levels in the wells during routine
monitoring in 1975 and subsequently shut down
unacceptably contaminated wells until a redwood
slat treatment system was installed in 1981. EPA
conducted a remedial investigation between 1984
and 1986 leading to a 1986 ROD which required
the city to operate an air stripping unit. EPA
conducted a subsequent remedial investigation in
1987 which further defined the contaminated
ground water area and identified the Elinco/Pitney
Bowes/Matheis Court Complex, located east of
the site and upgradient of the well field, as a
source of ground water contamination. This
ROD, the second of three planned operable units,
addresses the major source area. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil and
ground water are VOCs including benzene, PCE,
TCE, toluene, and xylenes.
37
-------
The selected remedial action for this site includes
onsite in-situ vacuum extraction followed by
carbon adsorption to remediate soil underlying
the major source area at the court complex;
ground water pumping and onsite treatment using
air stripping followed by offsite discharge; and
periodic sampling of ground water, soil vapor, and
indoor air. The estimated present worth cost for
this remedial action is $9,100,000, which includes
a present worth O&M cost of $3,034,000 for 30
years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS;
Chemical-specific goals for ground water cleanup
are based on MCLs and include benzene 5 ug/1,
toluene 2,000 ug/1, TCE 5 ug/1, and PCE 5 ug/1.
EPA has established soil cleanup goals based on
a soil leaching model. Chemical-specific soil
cleanup goals range depending on the soil type
and include benzene 1.2-36.7 ug/kg, toluene
5,523-169,552 ug/kg, TCE 12-358 ug/kg and PCE
33-1,036 ug/kg.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls will restrict soil excavation and well
Installation in contaminated areas.
KEYWORDS; Air Monitoring; Air Stripping;
Benzene; Carbon Adsorption; Clean Air Act;
Clean Water Act; Direct Contact; Drinking Water
Supply; Floodplain; Ground Water; Ground
Water Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Institutional Controls; MCLs; Municipally Owned
Site; Offsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment; O&M;
PCE; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil;
State Standards/Regulations; TCE; Treatment
Technology; Vacuum Extraction; VOCs; Wetlands;
Xylenes.
NORWOOD PCBs, MA
First Remedial Action - Final
September 29, 1989
The 26-acre Norwood PCBs site consists of
several industrial and commercial properties,
parking areas, and vacant lots in Norwood,
Norfolk County, Massachusetts. Significant site
features include the Grant Gear property to the
north, an office park complex which extends along
the western portion of the site, and residential
areas which border the site to the west and
north. Meadow Brook, which discharges to the
Neponset River, and an associated wooded
wetlands area make up the north site boundary.
Four piles of sediment sludge, previously dredged
from the stream, are located on the south bank of
the brook. Site contamination originated from
disposal practices of previous businesses, primarily
electrical equipment manufacturing, that operated
from the building now owned by Grant Gear
Realty Trust. In April 1983 the State responded
to a citizen report of previous industrial waste
dumping at the site and took surficial soil and
sediment samples which confirmed PCB
contamination. In June 1983 EPA removed 500
tons of PCB-contaminated soil from the office
park complex and Grant Gear properties and
disposed of it offsite. The State implemented an
Interim Remedial Measure in 1986 to limit access
to areas with high surface contamination on the
Grant Gear property by constructing a 1.5-acre
cap. The primary contaminants of concern
affecting soil, sediment, ground water, and
building surfaces are VOCs including TCE and
PCE; other organics including PCBs, PAHs, and
phenols; and metals.
The selected source control remedial measures
include excavation, solvent extraction, and onsite
disposal of approximately 31,000 cubic yards of
unsaturated soil and dredge pile sediment and
approximately 3,000 cubic yards of Meadow Brook
sediment followed by installing a soil cover over
the treated soil; offsite incineration and disposal
of extracted oils containing PCBs; flushing and
cleansing portions of the Grant Gear drainage
system; cleaning and sealing roof surfaces, and
decontaminating machinery, equipment, and floor
surfaces in the Grant Gear building which exceed
TSCA cleanup levels; ground water collection in
a barrier drain trench with onsite treatment by
carbon adsorption for PCBs, air stripping for
VOCs removal, and precipitation/filtration for
metals removal; wetlands restoration; long-term
environmental monitoring of ground water, soil,
sediment, and building surfaces; and institutional
controls restricting ground water and land use.
The estimated present worth cost for this selected
remedy is $16,100,000, which includes annual
O&M costs for up to 10 years.
-------
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
To assist in the establishment of cleanup
standards, EPA has divided the site into three
sections: Section A is the area of soil and dredge
sediment north of the Grant Gear fence and
adjacent to Meadow Brook; Section B includes
areas within the Grant Gear property and
surrounding commercial properties; and the final
section is the Meadow Brook sediment area.
Chemical-specific soil target cleanup levels for
Section A are PCBs 1 mg/kg and PAHs 2 mg/kg
based on a 7 x 10"* cancer-risk level; and for
Section B, PCBs 10 mg/kg (25 mg/kg for soil
covered with pavement outside Grant Gear) and
PAHs 6 mg/kg based on a 10"* cancer-risk level,
and TCE 24 ug/kg and PCE 60 ug/kg based on
preventing contamination to ground water above
MCLs. The cleanup level for sediment in Meadow
Brook is PCBs 1 mg/kg based on 1.5 x 10'7 excess
cancer-risk level, and PCBs 0.5 ug/kg for
discharge to Meadow Brook. Ground water target
cleanup levels were established based on Federal
and State MCLs for TCE 5 ug/1, PCE 5 ug/1, and
four other organics.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Controls will
be designed to insure that ground water on the
zone of contamination will not be used as a
drinking water source, and to prevent disturbance
of contaminated untreated subsurface soil within
the Grant Gear property, sediment in Grant Gear
drainage systems and soil under paved areas
outside Grant Gear.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Carbon Adsorption;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Air Act; Clean
Water Act; Debris; Decontamination; Direct
Contact; Excavation; Floodplain; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; Metals; MCLs; Onsite Discharge;
Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment; O&M;
Organics; PAHs; PCBs; PCE; Phenols; Public
Health Advisory; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water
Act; Sediment; Soil; Solvent Extraction; State
Guidance; State Permit; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Toxic Substances
Control Act; Treatability Studies; Treatment
Technology; VOCs; Wetlands.
O'CONNOR, ME
First Remedial Action - Final
September 27, 1989
The O'Connor site covers a 9-acre area near the
city limits of Augusta, Maine. The area
neighboring the site consists of woodlands, a
small poultry farm, private properties and
residences, and wetlands. A portion of the site
is also located within a 100-year floodplain. The
F. O'Connor Company began operating a salvage
and electrical transformer recycling business at the
site in the early 1950s. Because of previous oil
spills the State investigated the site in 1976 and
found the surface water, sediment, and soil
contaminated with PCBs. As a result of this
study the F. O'Connor Company constructed two
surface water impoundments (lagoons) to control
further migration of oils from the site. In 1977
the State ordered the F. O'Connor Company to
discontinue use of the lagoons. Subsequently the
lagoon waters were pumped into several onsite
storage tanks and the sediment was excavated,
deposited in a low area onsite, and covered with
a clay cover. The sediment created a barrier for
surface water and formed an upland marsh onsite.
In May 1987 EPA and the State jointly issued an
amended Administrative Order to F. O'Connor
Company requiring field investigations and
extensions of the existing fence to areas where
additional contamination was found. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil,
sediment, ground water, and surface water are
VOCs including benzene; other organics including
PCBs and PAHs; and metals including lead.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
pumping and offsite treatment of lagoon and
upland marsh surface water; excavation and onsite
treatment of approximately 23,500 cubic yards of
contaminated soil and sediment using a solvent
extraction process followed by onsite disposal of
residuals; onsite treatment of gases from the
solvent extraction process; extraction and offsite
treatment of solvent residues using incineration;
onsite treatment by solidification of soil and
sediment that do not achieve target cleanup goals
after treatment, followed by offsite disposal;
backfilling and upgrading the excavated area with
clean soil and treated soil; ground water pumping
and treatment using activated carbon adsorption
followed by onsite reinjection; and sediment and
39
-------
ground water monitoring. The estimated total
cost for this remedial action is $14,221,000 which
includes annual O&M costs of $56,000 in year 1,
554,000 for years 2-4, $92,000 for year 5, and
565,000 for years 6-30.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Target cleanup goals were based on a 10'5 excess
cancer risk. Individual goals for soil and
sediment include PCBs 1 mg/kg, PAHs 1 mg/kg,
and lead 248 mg/kg; for ground water, PCBs
0.5 ug/1, and benzene 5 ug/1; and for surface
water, PCBs 0.065 ug/1 and lead 1.94 ug/1.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed and land
use restrictions to prohibit ground water use will
be implemented.
KEYWORDS; Benzene; Carbon Adsorption
(GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Air Act;
Clean Water Act; Direct Contact; Drinking Water
Contaminants; Excavation; Filling; Floodplain;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Incineration/Thermal
Destruction; Institutional Controls; MCLs; Metals;
Offsite Disposal; Offsite Treatment; Onsite
Discharge; Onsite Treatment; PAHs; PCBs; Plume
Management; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act;
Sediment; Soil; Solidification/Stabilization; Solvent
Extraction; State Standards/Regulations; Surface
Water, Toxic Substances Control Act; Treatability
Studies; Treatment Technology; Wetlands.
PINETTBS SALVAGE YARD, ME
First Remedial Action - Final
May 30, 1989
The Pinette's Salvage Yard site is approximately
one mile southwest of the town of Washburn,
Aroostook County, Maine, in the northeast corner
of the State. The site consists of a vehicle repair
and salvage yard and an adjacent undeveloped
area containing wetlands. Land surrounding the
site is used for residential, general industrial, and
agricultural purposes. An undeveloped forest and
a wetlands area are also adjacent to the site. The
water supply for the approximately eight to ten
residences located within a one-half mile radius of
the site is obtained from private wells located in
the deep, bedrock aquifer below the site.
Municipal wells, used to supply the drinking
water to the residents of Washburn, are located
one mile northeast of the site. In June 1979
three electrical transformers were removed from
Loring Air Force Base by a private electrical
contractor and allegedly brought to the site where
they ruptured while being moved from the
delivery vehicle. Approximately 900 to 1,000
gallons of dielectric fluid containing PCBs spilled
directly onto the ground. A removal action was
performed in late 1983 which included excavation
and offsite disposal of 800 cubic yards of municial
PCB-contaminated soil from the site. Subsequent
investigations at the site revealed the presence of
a wide range of PCB concentrations in the surface
and subsurface soils. The highest levels of PCBs
are in the general area of the transformer fluid
spill. Surface migration of PCBs extends as far
as the undeveloped land adjacent to the salvage
yard. In addition, soil contaminated with
chlorinated benzenes was found in the spill area.
The total volume of contaminated soil above 5
mg/kg PCBs and containing other organics is
approximately 2,200 cubic yards. Detectable
concentrations of PCBs and benzene compounds
were identified in both the shallow and deep
aquifers localized within and slightly downgradient
of the spill area. This remedy is designed
primarily to address soil contamination and, to
the extent practicable, ground water
contamination at the site. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil and
ground water are VOCs including benzene;
organics including PCBs; and metals including
lead.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
excavation and offsite incineration of 300 cubic
yards of soil containing greater than 50 mg/kg
PCBs; excavation and onsite solvent extraction of
1,700 to 1,900 cubic yards of soil containing
between 5 and 50 mg/kg PCBs and other organic
contaminants, with offsite incineration of
treatment process effluent and onsite treatment of
air emissions; excavation of approximately 500
cubic yards of surface soil containing between 1
and 5 mg/kg PCBs to a minimum depth of 10
inches and placement, along with treated soil, in
the area where more highly contaminated soil was
excavated, followed by additional soil covering and
revegetation; onsite ground water pumping, and
collection via interceptor trenches, with treatment
using filtration and carbon adsorption, followed
40
-------
by discharge of treated water into the shallow
aquifer; access restrictions; institutional controls;
and sediment, ground water, and surface water
monitoring. The estimated present worth cost for
this site is $4,367,000 which includes annual
O&M costs of $135,000 for years 1-2, $42,000 for
years 3-5, and $20,000 for years 6-30.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Target cleanup goals were established for six soil
contaminants including PCBs 5 mg/kg (based on
a State cleanup level slightly more stringent than
a 10'5 excess cancer-risk level) and benzene 260
ug/kg. Target goals were provided for seven
ground water contaminants including PCBs 0.5
ug/1 (State Maximum Exposure Guidelines),
benzene 5 ug/1 (MCL), 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene 680
ug/1 (based on 2 x 10'2 reference dose level), and
lead 5 ug/1 (MCL). Due to the technical
impracticability from an engineering perspective
of obtaining the PCB target cleanup goal in the
ground water, EPA is invoking a waiver from
compliance with this goal.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls will be established to prevent use of
onsite ground water for drinking water purposes
both during and, if necessary, following overall
site remediation.
KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; ARAR Waiver;
Benzene; Carbon Adsorption (GAC);
Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Air Act; Clean
Water Act; Direct Contact; Drinking Water
Contaminants; Excavation; Filling; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; Incineration/Thermal Destruction;
Institutional Controls; Lead; MCLs; Metals;
Offeite Disposal; Offsite Treatment; O&M; Onsite
Discharge; Onsite Treatment; Organics; PCBs;
Plume Management; RCRA; RCRA Closure
Requirements; Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil;
Solvent Extraction; Solvents; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water Monitoring;
Toxic Substances Control Act; Treatability
Studies; Treatment Technology; VOCs; Wetlands.
SACO TANNERY WASTE PITS, ME
First Remedial Action - Final
September 27, 1989
The Saco Tannery Waste Pits site is in Saco,
Maine, approximately 15 miles southwest of
Portland, Maine. The 233-acre site is in a rural
area which includes forests and wetlands, and lies
within the 100-year floodplain of Stuart Brook.
Between 1959 and the early 1980s a leather
tannery operator used the site to dispose of
process wastes in two 2-acre lagoons and 53
smaller disposal pits. EPA and State
investigations in the early 1980s led to a removal
response action which included pumping liquids
from three waste pits and neutralizing the
remaining sludge from the pits. This ROD
addresses both source control and ground water
remediation and identifies a contingency plan in
the event the State legislature fails to enact the
necessary institutional controls within two years.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the sediment, sludge, ground water, and surface
water are metals including arsenic, chromium, and
lead.
The selected remedial action is contingent upon
the State enacting legislation within two years
designating the site as a permanent conservation
area. The remedy includes pumping and offsite
treatment and discharge of water from waste pits
and lagoons followed by covering and revegetating
waste pits, lagoons, and associated wet areas;
compensation for six acres of lost wetlands;
ground water and surface water monitoring to
determine whether contaminants exceed specified
action levels which would require further site
evaluation; and implementation of institutional
controls. If legislation is not passed to restrict
future use of the site, a contingency plan will be
implemented which includes excavating and
solidifying soil and sludge from the waste pits and
lagoons with onsite disposal in a RCRA landfill,
and ground water and surface water monitoring.
The estimated present worth cost for the selected
remedial action ranges from $9,211,600 to
$10,551,400, which includes present worth O&M
costs ranging from $2,500,000 to $3,800,000.
41
-------
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Target cleanup levels were developed for sediment
and sludge contaminants which exceed a
carcinogenic risk of 10*7 or a noncarcinogenic risk
greater than a total hazard index of 1.0. Specific
cleanup goals include total chromium 2,000 mg/kg
(based on the Ecological Risk Assessment), lead
125 mg/kg (health-based State target level), and
arsenic 60 mg/kg. Alternate Concentration Levels
(ACLs) were established for arsenic in ground
water. If other contaminants are detected above
MCLs, an evaluation of additional remedial action
will be made.
INSnTUnONAL CONTROLS: If the State
designates the site a permanent conservation area,
land and ground water use and deed restrictions
will be implemented as part of this designation.
KEYWORDS; ACL; Arsenic; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Clean Air Act; Clean
Water Act; Contingent Remedy; Direct Contact;
Floodplain; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Institutional Controls; Lead; MCLs;
Metals; O&M; Safe Drinking Water Act;
Sediment; Sludge; State Standards/Regulations;
Surface Water Monitoring; Wetlands.
SOUTH MUNICIPAL WATER
SUPPLY WELL, NH
First Remedial Action - Final'
September 27, 1989
The 250-acre South Municipal Water Supply Well
site is approximately two miles south of the town
of Peterborough, in Hillsborough County, New
Hampshire. The site includes the Contoocook
River, the Noone Pond System, and a wetlands
area. Also on the site are the New Hampshire
Ball Bearings Incorporated (NHBB)
manufacturing facility, several commercial
establishments, and several apartments. Land use
in the vicinity of the site is rural and
undeveloped. Ground water flow beneath the site
is generally eastward from the NHBB property
towards the South Municipal Well. The town of
Peterborough discontinued use of the South Well
in May 1983 after the State discovered VOC
contamination in water samples taken from the
well. Subsequent investigations revealed that a
plume of contaminated ground water extended
from under the NHBB property to the vicinity of
the South Well. VOC contamination was also
detected in soil on the NHBB property, and
wetlands sediment was found to be contaminated
with PCBs, metals, and PAHs. Investigations
attributed the contamination to in-house chemical
releases that were subsequently washed out
through floor drains or slop sinks to outfalls, or
washed out through facility doors. Exterior
releases contributed to contamination at the site
through the draining of a truck-mounted waste
solvent tank. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil and ground water are
VOCs including PCE, TCE, and toluene; the
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
sediment are organics including PCBs and PAHs,
and metals.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
ground water pumping from the highly
contaminated NHBB area plume and treatment
using a phase separation settlement tank/
pretreatment system, air stripping, carbon columns
for air emission control, and onsite discharge;
ground water pumping from the dilute plume
outside the NHBB area and treatment using air
stripping and carbon columns and onsite
discharge; in-situ vacuum extraction of 7,500 cubic
yards of contaminated onsite soil; excavation
and/or dredging with dewatering of 1,170 cubic
yards of wetlands sediment and offsite disposal;
wetlands restoration with clean fill, surface
contouring, and revegetation; implementation of
institutional controls restricting ground water use
and well installation; and long-term ground water
monitoring. The estimated present worth cost for
this remedial action is $7,387,769, which includes
an estimated present worth O&M cost of
$3,992,105.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Target cleanup levels for ground water were based
on SDWA MCLs including PCE 5 ug/1, TCE 5
ug/1, and toluene 2,000 ug/1. Target cleanup levels
for soil were established to reduce contaminant
migration to ground water and include PCE 4.5
ug/kg, TCE 1.5 ug/kg, and toluene 1,500 ug/kg.
Soil target levels will attain a 2.92 x 10~10 excess
cancer-risk level. Target cleanup levels for
sediment include PAHs 1.1 ug/kg and PCBs 1
42
-------
ug/kg, which will attain an excess cancer risk of
2.9 x lO'7 for PCBs and 1.3 x lO"6 for PAHs for a
total risk of 1.3 x 10"6.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls will be established to prevent well use
and well installation in areas of contaminated
ground water.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Clean Air Act;
Clean Water Act; Direct Contact; Dredging;
Drinking Water Contaminants; Excavation;
Filling; Floodplain; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Institutional Controls; MCLs; Metals; Offeite
Disposal; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment;
O&M; PAHs; PCBs; PCE; Plume Management;
RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act; Sediment; Soil;
State Standards/Regulations; TCE; Toluene;
Vacuum Extraction; VOCs.
SULLIVAN'S LEDGE, MA
First Remedial Action
June 29, 1989
The Sullivan's Ledge site is a 12-acre disposal
area in an urban area of New Bedford,
Massachusetts. The site is bordered by a country
club and marsh area to the north and small
businesses to the east and west The site was
operated originally as a granite quarry and
includes four 150 ft. deep quarry pits. Between
the 1930s and 1970s, the quarry and adjacent
areas were used for disposal of hazardous
materials and other industrial wastes. Site
investigations conducted in 1986 and 1988
revealed high concentrations of PCBs in soil and
sediment, and VOCs and inorganics in on-and
offsite ground and surface water. Surface runoff
and ground water from the disposal area
discharge into the adjacent stream which drains
into the country club golf course and the Middle
Marsh Wetlands area. In addition, a small
portion of the site lies within the stream's
100-year floodplain. EPA concluded that the
contamination sources includes onsite soil and
PCB-contaminated sediment washed offsite to an
adjacent stream and wetland areas, and wastes
disposed of in the former quarry pits. This ROD
addresses source control and migration
management; a subsequent ROD will address the
Middle Marsh area. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil, sediment, ground water,
and surface water are VOCs including benzene
and TCE; organics including PCBs and PAHs;
and metals including lead.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
excavation/dredging of 24,200 cubic yards of soil
and 1,900 cubic yards of sediment with onsite
treatment using solidification, followed by onsite
disposal; construction of an 11-acre impermeable
cap; air monitoring; diversion and lining of the
stream adjacent to site; active ground water
pumping and passive underdrain collection with
treatment using oxidation/filtration and
UV/ozonation with offsite disposal of
contaminated residuals (ground water disposal will
be determined after further studies); wetlands
restoration/enhancement; sediment, ground water,
and surface water monitoring; institutional
controls including ground water use and access
restrictions. The estimated present worth cost is
$10,100,000; O&M costs were included in the
present worth cost but were not provided.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Onsite soil cleanup standards for PCBs and PAHs
were health-based using a 10'5 cancer-risk level
and include remediation of soil contaminated with
total PCBs above 50 mg/kg and/or total cPAHs
above 30 mg/kg. Offeite soil will be tested
further before chemical-specific goals are
provided; however, offsite soil with PCBs greater
than 10 mg/kg (based on a 10'5 cancer-risk level)
will be excavated and disposed of onsite, and soil
with PCBs greater than 50 mg/kg will be solidified
onsite. The sediment cleanup standard for PCBs
is the interim mean sediment quality criteria
(SQC) value of 20 ug/gC. Where total organic
carbon (TOC) is less than or equal to 10 gC/kg,
target treatment for sediment will be 0.2 mg/kg
PCBs. Because of the geology of the deep
fractured bedrock and possible presence of dense
non-aqueous phase liquids, EPA considers ground
water treatment to MCLs technically
impracticable. Active ground water collection
system cleanup standards for VOCs will reduce
VOCs to a range of 1-10 mg/1 and/or until an
asymptotic curve indicates that no significant
concentration reductions are being achieved.
Passive ground water collection system cleanup
standards will be based on State AWQS.
43
-------
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls will be implemented to prevent the use
of ground water for drinking water and to place
deed restrictions regulating land use at the site.
KEYWORDS; Air Monitoring; ARAR Waiver;
Benzene; Capping; Carcinogenic Compounds;
Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act; Direct Contact;
Dredging; Drinking Water Contaminants;
Excavation; Filling; Floodplain; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; Institutional Controls; Lead; MCLs;
Metals; O&M; Onsite Disposal; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; PAHs; PCBs; Plume
Management; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act;
Sediment; Soil; Solidification/Stabilization; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water; Surface
Water Collection/Diversion; Surface Water
Monitoring; TCE; Toxic Substances Control Act;
Treatability Studies; Treatment Technology,
VOCs; Water Quality Criteria; Wetlands.
WJL GRACE (ACTON PLANT), MA
First Remedial Action
September 29, 1989
The W.R. Grace (Acton Plant) site is in Acton
and Concord, Massachusetts. The American
Cyanamid and Dewey & Almy Chemical
companies formerly owned the 200-acre site where
they manufactured explosives, synthetic rubber
container sealant products, latex products,
plasticizers, and resins. In 1954 W.R. Grace &
Company purchased the property and began
producing container sealing compounds, latex
products, and paper and plastic battery separators.
Effluent wastes from these operations flowed into
several unlined lagoons and were later buried in
onsite waste areas, including an industrial landfill.
After a 1978 investigation revealed that ground
water in the vicinity of the site was contaminated
with VOCs, W.R. Grace & Company agreed to
fully restore the aquifer. An aquifer restoration
system was installed in 1985 which recovers and
treats ground water under the site's waste disposal
areas. Subsequent samplings, however, have
indicated that the system has only minimally
reduced the ground water contamination at the-
site. This first operable unit primarily addresses
the source contamination and includes minimal
modifications to the aquifer restoration system.
Further ground water remediation will be
addressed in a subsequent ROD. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil,
sediment, and sludge are VOCs including benzene
and toluene; other organics; and metals including
arsenic.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
excavation and offsite incineration of highly
contaminated soil and sludge; onsite solidification
of less contaminated soil, sludge, and sediment
followed by onsite disposal in the landfill and
capping of the landfill; covering and monitoring
other waste areas; modification to the aquifer
restoration system to address air stripper
emissions controls; and environmental monitoring.
The estimated total cost for this remedial action
is $7,058,000, which includes an estimated O&M
cost of $2,468,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil cleanup goals were established for five
indicator compounds to ensure that any further
contaminant migration to the ground water will
not result in ground water levels exceeding
drinking water , standards (including MCLs).
Chemical-specific goals were provided but specific
goals for each contaminant varied depending on
the location of the waste area onsite. The overall
cumulative risk associated with the soil cleanup
levels is 8.34 x lO'7.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; Arsenic;
Benzene; Capping; Carcinogenic Compounds;
Clean Air Act; Direct Contact; Excavation;
Ground Water Monitoring; Incineration/Thermal
Destruction; Landfill Closure; MCLs; Metals;
Offsite Treatment; O&M; Onsite Containment;
Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment; Organics;
RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act; Sediment;
Sludge; Soil; Solidification/Stabilization; State
Standards/Regulations; Toluene; Treatability
Studies; Treatment Technology; VOCs.
44
-------
WELLS G&H, MA
First Remedial Action
September 14, 1989
The Wells G&H site encompasses 330 acres
within the zone of contribution of two municipal
drinking water wells known as Well G and Well
H, commonly referred to as Wells G&H, in
Woburn, Massachusetts. The area near the wells
consists of industrial, commercial, residential, and
recreational development. The Aberjona River
flows through the site, and a substantial onsite
wetlands area is associated with the river's
floodplain. Wells G&H were developed in the
1960s and provided over one quarter of the
Woburn community water supply. In 1979 the
State closed the wells and provided the
community with an alternate water supply after
detecting several chlorinated VOCs in the wells.
EPA investigations beginning in 1981 resulted in
the site being divided into three discrete operable
units: first, five properties inside the perimeter of
the site boundary which were identified as source
areas of contamination; second, a central area
immediately surrounding Wells G&H with
extensive ground water contamination; and third,
a segment of the Aberjona River and associated
wetlands containing contaminated sediment.
Between 1983 and 1989 EPA issued several
Administrative Orders to site property owners
requiring cleanup activities including limiting site
access and removing drums and debris. This
ROD addresses remediating contaminated soil and
ground water found at the first operable unit, the
five properties identified as principal sources of
contamination, and further evaluating the
remaining operable units. A subsequent ROD
will address the second and third operable units
which include the central area of the site and the
river sediment. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil, sludge, debris, and
ground water are VOCs including PCE and TCE;
other organics including cPAHs, PCBs, and
pesticides; and metals including lead.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
in-situ volatilization, using carbon adsorption for
treatment of the extracted vapor, of the 7,400
cubic yards of soil contaminated with VOCs only;
excavation and onsite incineration of 3,100 cubic
yards of the remaining contaminated soil and
backfilling the excavated areas; ground water
pumping and treatment in the five source areas,
using pretreatment for metals followed by air
stripping and vapor phase carbon filtering with
either discharge onsite to the Aberjona River or
reinjection into the aquifer or both; removing and
disposing of 410 cubic yards of sludge and debris;
and ground water monitoring. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action is
$68,400,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Three approaches were used to determine soil
cleanup levels. The first approach was based on
protecting ground water from VOC contamination
from the soil and includes individual goals for soil
of PCE 36.7 ug/kg and TCE 12.7 ug/kg. The
second approach was based on a 10"* cancer-risk
level and includes individual goals for cPAHs
0.694 mg/kg, PCBs 1.04 mg/kg, and 4-4 -DDT 23.5
mg/kg. The third approach established a cleanup
goal for lead at 640 mg/kg based on a target
blood lead level of 10 ug/dl. Ground water
cleanup goals for the aquifer were established at
MCLs and include PCE 5 ug/1 (based on TCE)
and TCE 5 ug/1. Effluent levels for discharge to
the Aberjona River were based State AWQSs; if
discharge is to the aquifer, MCLs will be met.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: EPA
recommends that deed and land use restrictions
be implemented to restrict use of the aquifer in
the vicinity of the site.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Carbon Adsorption;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Air Act; Clean
Water Act; Debris; Direct Contact; Drinking
Water Contaminants; Excavation; Floodplain;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Incineration/Thermal
Destruction; Institutional Controls; Lead; MCLs;
Metals; O&M; Onsite Containment; Onsite
Discharge; Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment;
Organics; PAHs; PCBs; PCE; Pesticides; RCRA;
Safe Drinking Water Act; Sludge; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Toxic Substances
Control Act; Treatability Studies; Treatment
Technology; Volatilization/Soil Aeration; VOCs;
Water Quality Criteria; Wetlands.
45
-------
RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
REGION H
(New Jersey, New York, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands)
BEC TRUCKING, NY
First Remedial Action - Final
September 28, 1989
The BEC Trucking site, also known as the
Binghamton Equipment Company, is in the town
of Vestal, Broome County, New York. The
3.5-acre site is an open lot which overlies a Class
II aquifer. Land use neighboring the site is
primarily commercial/industrial, but includes
wetlands or marsh area to the west. Prior to the
mid-1960s, the BEC Trucking site was an
unimproved marshland. The original owner,
Haial Trucking, filled some of the marshlands
with various fill materials, including fly ash from
a local power company. BEC Trucking, Haial
Trucking's successor, operated a combination
truck body fabrication and truck maintenance
facility. Paint thinners and enamel reducers, used
during operations, and waste hydraulic oil and
waste motor oil reportedly generated during
operations were stored in a drum storage area on
the western portion of the site. A 1982 State
inspection identified approximately 50 drums, 20
of which contained waste engine or cutting oils,
enamel reducers, paint thinners, and waste
solvents. The drums in the storage area were
removed in 1983 along with some stained soil
around the drums. In 1988 extensive sampling of
ground water, surface water, and soil revealed
low-level contamination. The suspected source of
onsite ground water and surface water
contamination appears to be a leaking
underground storage tank on a neighboring
property. Remedial activities are currently being
undertaken at the neighboring site to address any
ground water or surface water contamination at
the site resulting from the tank's leakage.
The selected remedial action for this site is no
further action. A monitoring program will be
established to ensure that this remedy continues
to be protective of human health and the
environment. The estimated cost for this
remedial action will be determined during the
development of the proposed monitoring program.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Not applicable.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Ground Water Monitoring; No
Action Remedy; Surface Water Monitoring.
BOG CREEK FARM, NJ
Second Remedial Action - Final
June 28, 1989
The Bog Creek Farm site is a 4-acre disposal area
consisting of a man-made pond, bog, and trench
in Howell Township, Monmouth County, New
Jersey. The site is bordered to the north by
Squankum Brook, to the west by two residences
and a riding stable, and to the south and north by
open fields. Between 1973 and 1974 organic
solvents and paint residues were dumped around
a trench in the eastern portion of the property,
creating a highly contaminated soil area. Some
chemicals migrated into a shallow underlying
aquifer, creating a contaminant plume that
discharged to the pond and bog along the
northern border of the site and to the north
branch of Squankum Brook. In late 1974 the
property owner removed some waste from the
disposal trench and covered the trench under
direction from the Howell Township Health
Department. A 1985 ROD selected a first
operable unit remedy that involved excavating the
soil from the waste trench, pond, and bog areas
and incinerating the soil onsite. This second
operable unit focuses on remediating the
contaminated ground water in the shallow aquifer
and the contaminated brook sediment. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
sediment and ground water are VOCs including
benzene, toluene and xylenes; other organics
including phenols; and metals including lead.
The selected remedy for this site includes ground
water pumping and treatment using air stripping,
hydrogen peroxide/ultra violet photolysis
oxidation, carbon adsorption, and reinjection;
46
-------
excavation of 90 cubic yards of brook sediment,
followed by onsite incineration and onsite
disposal; and stream bed restoration using clean
sand or soil of similar consistency to the existing
material. The estimated present worth cost for
this remedial action is $6,927,000, which includes
annual O&M costs of $663,000 for ten years of
ground water treatment.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Because there is no human exposure to
contaminated ground water, the cleanup goals are
based on protection of the surface water (north
branch of Squankum Brook) rather than human
consumption of ground water. The goals are
derived from limits that would allow for surface
water discharge under a State NPDES permit.
Chemical-specific goals include petroleum
hydrocarbons 15 mg/1, total lead 56 ug/l, benzene
5 ug/I, toluene 74 ug/l, and phenol 47 ug/l.
Individual contaminant goals were not specified
for brook sediment.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Benzene; Carbon
Adsorption; Carcinogenic Compounds; Excavation;
Ground Water; Ground Water Treatment;
Incineration/Thermal Destruction; Onsite
Discharge, Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment;
O&M; Organics; Phenols; Sediment; State Permit;
State Standards/Regulations; Toluene; VOCs;
Wetlands; Xylenes.
BYRON BARREL & DRUM, NY
First Remedial Action - Final
September 29, 1989
The Byron Barrel & Drum site is in Genesee
County, New York, and occupies approximately
two acres of an eight-acre tract of land. The
rural area surrounding the site includes woods,
wetlands and agricultural land, with approximately
320 people living within a one-mile radius of the
site. The site is a former salvage yard for heavy
construction equipment, some of which remains
onsite along with other debris. From 1978 to
1980 the site owner reportedly abandoned
approximately 200 barrels of hazardous waste
without a permit. Some drums were reportedly
ripped open, causing the hazardous waste to mix
with the soil, and ultimately to be buried onsite.
The State and EPA discovered these barrels in
1982 and initiated an investigation which resulted
in the removal and disposal of the drums and
approximately 40 cubic yards of contaminated soil
and debris. A subsequent remedial investigation
in 1987 revealed that solvent spills have
contaminated two major areas of the site,
resulting in soil and ground water contamination.
This remedial action addresses the two
contaminated ground water plumes and residual
soil contamination which have been releasing
contaminants into the ground water. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil and
ground water are VOCs including benzene, PCE,
TCE, toluene, and xylenes; other organics
including PAHs, and phenols; and metals
including chromium and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
pumping and treatment of ground water using
precipitation, sedimentation, and filtration to
remove metals, and air stripping and carbon
adsorption to remove organics, followed by
reinjection into the aquifer and, if necessary,
offsite discharge of excess treated water; disposal
of ground water residues at an offsite
RCRA-permitted facility; in-situ soil flushing of
4,100 cubic yards of contaminated soil; further
evaluation of 1,100 cubic yards of inorganic
contaminated soil to determine ultimate disposal;
dismantling and decontaminating debris followed
by offsite disposal; and air and ground water
monitoring. The estimated present worth cost for
this remedial action is $5,572,000, which includes
annual O&M costs of $259,700.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water will meet State and Federal
ARARs including MCLs. Specific ground water
cleanup levels include benzene 5 ug/l (MCL),
toluene 2,000 ug/l (PMCL), xylenes 440 ug/l
(MCL), PCE 5 ug/l (based on TCE MCL), and
TCE 5 ug/l (MCL). Soil will meet site-specific
action levels, which will ensure that organic and
inorganic contaminants will not leach into the
ground water at levels above MCLs. Specific soil
cleanup levels include toluene 45,000 ug/kg,
xylenes 8,200 ug/kg, PCE 140 ug/kg, and TCE 47
ug/kg.
47
-------
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS; Air Monitoring; Air Stripping;
Benzene; Carbon Adsorption (GAC);
Carcinogenic Compounds; Chromium; Debris;
Decontamination; Direct Contact; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; Lead; MCLs; Metals; O&M; Offsite
Discharge; Offsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment;
Organics; PAHs; PCE; Phenols; Plume
Management; Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil; Soil
Washing/Flushing; State Standards/Regulations;
TCE; Toluene; Treatment Technology, VOCs;
Wetlands; Xylenes.
CALDWELL TRUCKING, NJ
Second Remedial Action
September 28, 1989
The 11-acre Caldwell Trucking site is in Fairfield
Township, Essex County, New Jersey. The site is
situated on an extensive 100-year floodplain of
the Passaic River and neighbors Deepavaal Brook
and numerous wetlands, as well as residential and
commercial properties. From the 1950s to 1984
the Caldwell Trucking Company dumped, and
allowed others to dump, septic wastes into
unlined lagoons and later into steel holding tanks
at the site. An EPA investigation conducted
between 1984 and 1986 revealed that onsite soil
and a municipal well were contaminated with
VOCs, PCBs, and metals. The investigation
resulted in a 1986 ROD which provided for soil
remediation, restoration of a municipal well, and
residential hookups to municipal water. Ground
water, however, remains contaminated because of
a TCE-contaminated plume which extends 4,000
feet from the site towards the Passaic River.
Additional sources of the plume have been
identified, including the neighboring General
Hose facility which will be addressed by other
Federal and State authorities. A small seep to
Deepavaal Brook's tributary, which is recharged
by ground water, is also contaminated with TCE.
This response is the second remedial action and
addresses the remediation of contaminated offsite
ground water. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the ground water are VOCs
including TCE.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
pumping and treatment of offsite ground water
using air stripping with offsite discharge to the
Passaic River; installation of a drainage system to
eliminate surface exposure to contaminated
ground water; sealing ground water wells; and
ground water monitoring. The estimated present
worth cost for this remedial action is $11,540,000
which includes annual O&M costs of $315,000 for
30 years. If, however, access to private properties
and public roads needed for implementation of
this remedial action cannot be obtained, EPA and
the State will implement a contingency remedy
which includes limited treatment of ground water,
remediation of surface water, and sealing ground
water wells.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
This operable unit invokes a waiver from Federal
and State drinking water standards based on
technical impracticability, because it would take
more than 100 years of pumping and treatment to
attain State drinking water standards (e.g., TCE 1
ug/1). Instead, the remedy will achieve interim
cleanup levels which allow for potable use of
ground water with minimal treatment. Air
emissions and effluent discharges from the
treatment facility will comply with State ARARs.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; ARAR Waiver;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Contingent Remedy;
Drinking Water Contaminants; Floodplain;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; O&M; Offsite
Discharge; Onsite Treatment; Plume Management;
Safe Drinking Water Act; Sole-Source Aquifer;
State Standards/Regulations; TCE; VOCs;
Wetlands.
CHEMICAL INSECTICIDE, NJ
First Remedial Action
September 29, 1989
The Chemical Insecticide site is part of a 94-acre
industrial development in Edison, Middlesex
County, New Jersey. From 1958 to 1970
Chemical Insecticide Corporation (CIC) produced
and stored pesticide formulations at the property
resulting in soil, surface water, and ground water
48
-------
contamination. The site is currently vacant and
consists of the remaining building foundations,
asphalt roadways, a one-acre wetlands area, and a
surface water drainage ditch bordering the site to
the east, which ultimately drains into the Raritan
River. Between 1966 and 1969 CIC was ordered
by the city to close onsite lagoons, dispose of
leaking drums, and stop wastewater discharge.
Subsequent remedial investigation/feasibility study
(RI/FS) investigations revealed the extreme
complexity of the site remediation due to the
number and variety of contaminants (herbicides,
pesticides, and metals) and the physical
characteristics of the site. To address concerns
relating to high levels of contamination in the
drainage ditch, EPA installed a fence to limit
access to the ditch, in 1988 and subsequently
removed contaminated surface water run-off that
had collected in a parking lot onsite, and repaired
the ditch to prevent future overflow incidents.
This operable unit represents an interim remedial
action to address contaminated surface water
run-off from the site until the source of
contamination, the soil, is remediated. Future
operable units will address contaminated soil and
ground water. The primary contaminants of
concern in the soil which may affect the surface
water are organics including pesticides, and metals
including arsenic.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
clearing and grading the site; covering the entire
site with an impermeable surficial cap;
constructing a surface water run-off diversion
system; controlling the release of collected,
uncontaminated surface water run-off from the
site; and surface water monitoring. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action is
$1,420,211, which includes annual O&M costs of
$37,184.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The selected remedy does not provide for
treatment; rather it requires monitoring of
collected surface water and provides values of
allowable discharge to the storm drainage system.
Chemical-specific discharge levels were provided
based on State standards including arsenic 50 ug/1
(based on State WQS), and five pesticides.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Arsenic; Capping; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Direct Contact; Interim Remedy;
Metals; Organics; O&M; Pesticides; Public Health
Advisory; State Permit; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water; Surface
Water Collection/Diversion; Surface Water
Monitoring; Wetlands.
CIBA-GEIGY, NJ
First Remedial Action
April 24, 1989
The Ciba-Geigy site is in Dover Township, Ocean
County, New Jersey. The site covers 1,400 acres,
320 of which are developed; the remaining area is
largely wooded. The site is bounded by industrial,
commercial, residential, and recreational areas.
The Toms River, which derives surface water
primarily through ground water baseflow, runs
through the northeast sector of the property. The
aquifer system in the site area is tapped by
municipal, industrial, and private wells. The
manufacturing facility, presently owned by
Ciba-Geigy Chemical Corporation, has been in
operation since 1952 and is composed of
numerous buildings, an industrial wastewater
treatment plant, and a lined reservoir for
emergency storage of treated and untreated
wastewater. From 1952 to 1988, a variety of
synthetic organic pigments, organic dyestuffs and
intermediates, and epoxy resins were
manufactured at the site. The company disposed
of chemical wastes onsite in several locations,
including a 5.2-acre drum disposal area
(containing approximately 100,000 drums); a
3.9-acre lime sludge disposal area (used for
disposal of inorganic wastes); a 12-acre filtercake
disposal area (which received sludge from the
wastewater treatment); five backfilled lagoons
comprising 8.5 acres; and a calcium sulfate
disposal area. The drum disposal area and lime
sludge disposal area were closed and capped in
1978. About this time, the filtercake disposal
area was also closed and covered with soil.
Ground water contamination is migrating from
these inactive disposal sites easterly towards the
Toms River. Currently, the company generates
both liquid and solid wastes. The liquid wastes
are treated onsite in a wastewater treatment plant
before discharge to the Atlantic Ocean. The solid
wastes are disposed of offsite, and sludges from
49
-------
the wastewater treatment plant are disposed of in
a permitted, double-lined, onsite landfill. EPA
began investigating the site in 1980. Throughout
its operation, the facility has routinely violated
treatment and disposal permits, including
accepting hazardous offsite waste beginning in
1981. The landfill reportedly was leaking as early
as 1981, precipitating remedial measures by the
State including issuance of a consent order
forcing Ciba-Geigy to close part of the landfill
and monitor ground water and leachate. In 1984,
after discovering that Ciba-Geigy was illegally
disposing of drums containing liquids and
hazardous waste in the landfill, the State ordered
Ciba-Geigy to remove 14,000 drums. In 1985,
leaking equalization basins associated with the
wastewater treatment plant led to Ciba-Geigy
closing the basins and beginning remediation of
the contaminated plume from these basins.
Currently, contaminants are present in leaking
drums, waste sludges, soil, and ground water.
This ROD addresses the first operable unit
focusing on the remediation of ground water
contamination in the upper aquifer. Remediation
of the onsite source areas and deeper aquifer (if
needed) will be addressed in future operable
units. The primary contaminants of concern
affecting the ground water are VOCs including
benzene, PCE, TCE, and toluene; and metals
including arsenic and chromium.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
sealing contaminated residential irrigation wells;
on- and offsite ground water pumping with onsite
treatment using filtration, reverse osmosis, and
GAC in an upgraded version of the Ciba-Geigy
wastewater treatment plant, followed by
temporarily retaining the ground water in basins
for monitoring and subsequent discharge to the
Toms River; and implementation of a river and
ground water monitoring program. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action is
$164,500,000, which includes annual O&M costs
of 512,539,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water will comply with all Clean Water
Act (CWA) requirements and will be treated to
meet the proposed State Surface Water Quality
Standards including benzene 1 ug/1, PCE 1 ug/1,
TCE 1 ug/1, toluene 26 ug/1, total chromium 50
ug/1, and arsenic 50 ug/1. The State MCLs will be
attained for the aquifer. Specific goals for the
aquifer include benzene 1 mg/l, PCE 1 mg/1, TCE
8 mg/1, and chromium 0.05 mg/1. For unregulated
VOCs in the aquifer, single contaminant levels for
carcinogens are not to exceed 5 ug/1, and single
contaminant levels for possible carcinogens or
noncarcinogens are not to exceed 50 ug/1.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Arsenic; Benzene; Carbon
Adsorption; Carcinogenic Compounds; Chromium;
Clean Water Act; Direct Contact; Floodplain;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; MCLs; Metals; O&M;
Onsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment; PCE; Plume
Management; Safe Drinking Water Act; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Temporary Storage;
Toluene; VOCs; Wetlands.
CLAREMONT POLYCHEMICAL, NY
Second Remedial Action - Final
September 22, 1989
The Claremont Polychemical site is a 9.5-acre
abandoned chemical production facility in Oyster
Bay, Nassau County, New York. Land use in the
area is devoted primarily to light industrial and
commercial operations. Contamination at the site
took place between 1968 and 1980 and resulted
from ink and pigment manufacturing operations,
which generated wastes including organic solvents,
resins, and wash wastes. The site consists of a
one-story building with a contaminated sump, five
5,000-gallon wastewater treatment basins
containing sludge, and six above-ground tanks,
three of which still contain waste materials. The
initial discovery of site contamination occurred in
1979 when the county found 2,000 to 3,000 waste
drums, some uncovered and others leaking. By
the following year many of these drums were
either removed or reused in the plant; however,
the county had by this time identified an area of
organic solvent contamination east of the
building. Subsequently, a 10-foot layer of soil in
the area of contamination was excavated and
placed on a plastic liner. The liner has since
deteriorated and monitoring has identified ground
water contamination under the site. In October
1988 a removal action was conducted which
included the removal of liquids in the treatment
50
-------
basins and the classification, separation, and
storage of the approximately 700 bags and drums
of waste. The first operable unit for this site will
address soil and ground water contamination and
will be initiated after the second operable unit.
This second operable unit addresses the wastes in
containers above-ground tanks, wastewater
treatment basins, and a sump. The total volume
of wastes at the site could be as high as 100,000
pounds of solid materials, 10,000 gallons of
liquids, and 25,000 pounds of sludge. The
primary contaminants of concern in drummed and
packaged liquids and solids, and in treatment
basin sludge are VOCs including benzene,
toluene, TCE, and PCE; other organics; and
metals including arsenic, chromium, and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
compatibility testing on the contents of each
treatment basin, above-ground tank, sump, drum,
bulking and consolidation of compatible wastes
and pumping the contents of the above-ground
tanks, treatment basins, and sump into storage
tanks; analytical testing of composite samples of
drums or bulked wastes to determine appropriate
treatment or disposal methods; and transporting
the wastes for offsite treatment or disposal as
appropriate. The estimated present worth for this
remedial action, assuming treatment using
incineration, is $1,339,000 with no O&M costs.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The RCRA-listed wastes will be treated using the
best demonstrated available technology or treated
to attain specific treatment levels, as appropriate,
to comply with RCRA land disposal restrictions.
Chemical-specific levels were not specified.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Acids; Arsenic; Benzene;
Chromium; Consolidation; Debris; Direct Contact;
Lead; Metals; Offsite Disposal; Offsite Treatment;
Organics; PCE; RCRA; Sludge; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Toluene; VOCs;
Xylenes.
CLOTHIER DISPOSAL, NY
First Remedial Action - Final
December 28, 1988
The Clothier Disposal site is located in a rural
area near the town of Granby, Oswego County,
New York. It is a privately owned, 15-acre parcel
of land, of which approximately 6 acres have been
used for waste disposal. Land use in the vicinity
of the site is predominantly agricultural. A
wetland passes through the site to the west of the
area used for waste disposal. Ox Creek also flows
through the site in a northerly direction, feeding
into the Oswego River, and a portion of the site
is located within the 100-year floodplain. Ground
water flow patterns clearly indicate that flow is
toward Ox Creek. In 1973, drums of chemical
waste were discovered on the Clothier property,
despite State denial of a landfill permit
application. After the New York Department of
Environmental Conservation brought suit, the
owner made several attempts to clean up the
property. These attempts, however, resulted in
drums being broken and drained. Subsequently,
additional dumping of roofing materials,
household wastes and junked vehicles occurred at
the site. Based on data from the remedial
investigation and State sampling, EPA established
the need for a removal action for 2,200 drums
located ohsite. A number of potentially
responsible parties under an administrative order
on consent removed 1,858 drums. EPA removed
the remaining drums and visibly contaminated
surficial soil and debris associated with the drums.
This remedy addresses the low-level residual soil
contamination remaining onsite. If the results of
ground water, surface water and sediment
sampling determine a need to remediate the
ground water and/or the wetland, a subsequent
operable unit remedy will be undertaken. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the soil
are VOCs including toluene, xylenes, and PCE;
other organics including PAHs, PCBs and,
phenols; and metals.
The selected remedial action for the site includes
placement of a one-foot soil cover over the
contaminated areas and regrading and
revegetation of the site; installation of rip-rap, as
needed, on the embankment sloping towards Ox
Creek to prevent soil erosion; construction and
post-construction air monitoring; implementation
51
-------
of institutional controls preventing the utilization
of the underlying ground water, or any land use
involving significant disturbance of the soil cover;
and long-terra ground water, surface water, soil,
and sediment monitoring. The estimated present
worth cost for this remedy is $500,000, which
includes annual O&M costs of $27,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Because the remedy addresses containment,
chemical-specific standards or goals are not
applicable.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Well
restrictions will prevent the use of underlying
ground water. Land use restrictions on
residential use, or any use involving excavation at
the site or significant disturbance of the soil cover
will be implemented. Any institutional controls,
including but not limited to deed restrictions or
easements, shall be consistent with State law.
KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Direct Contact; Floodplain; Ground
Water Monitoring; Institutional Controls; Metals;
O&M; Organics; PAHs; PCBs; PCE; Phenols;
Soil; Surface Water Monitoring; Toluene; Toxic
Substances Control Act; VOCs; Wetlands;
Xylenes.
DE REWAL CHEMICAL, NJ
First Remedial Action
September 29, 1989
The De Rewal Chemical site is in Kingswood
Township, Hunterdon County, New Jersey. The
3.7-acre site lies within the 100-year floodplain
of the Delaware River and consists of a former
dumping area, a garage, a private residence, and
a building formerly occupied by the De Rewal
Chemical Company. Between 1970 and 1973 the
De Rewal Chemical Company reportedly
manufactured and stored a textile preservative and
an agricultural fungicide onsite. The State
discovered De Rewal Chemical Company's
improper chemical handling practices in 1972 but
was unsuccessful in forcing the company to
comply with permit requirements. The De Rewal
Chemical Company continued to improperly
dump chemicals onsite including one incident in
which a tank truck containing 3,000 to 5,000
gallons of highly acidic chromium solution was
allowed to drain onto the soil and eventually to
the Delaware River. In 1973 the State ordered
the company to excavate and place contaminated
soil on an impermeable liner. The company
reportedly only placed a portion of the
contaminated soil on an uncovered plastic sheet
before filing for bankruptcy. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil and
ground water are VOCs including PCE, TCE, and
toluene; other organics including PAHs; and
metals including chromium and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
excavation of 8,000 cubic yards of soil with onsite
thermal treatment of 2,100 cubic yards of
organic-contaminated soil followed by solidifying
the soil and ash residue along with the remaining
5,900 cubic yards of inorganic-contaminated soil
and onsite disposal; monitoring and controlling
air emissions generated during thermal treatment;
pumping and offsite treatment of perched zone
ground water at an offsite industrial wastewater
treatment facility; ground water monitoring;
provision of a treatment system for the onsite
residential well; temporarily relocating onsite
residents; and preparing a cultural resources
survey to ensure compliance with the National
Historic Preservation Act. The estimated present
worth cost for the selected remedial is $5,097,000,
which includes O&M costs of $865,400.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Contaminated soil which exceeds State action
levels will be excavated and treated to meet State
action levels. Specific soil cleanup goals include
total VOCs 1 mg/kg, chromium 100 mg/kg, and
lead 250 mg/kg. Ground water will be treated to
meet State SDWA MCLs. Specific ground water
cleanup goals include TCE 1 ug/1, PCE 1 ug/1,
chromium 50 ug/1, and lead 50 ug/1.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls will be implemented restricting further
property use to ensure the integrity of the
solidified mass.
KEYWORDS: Carcinogenic Compounds;
Chromium; Clean Air Act; Direct Contact;
Drinking Water Contaminants; Excavation;
Floodplain; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
52
-------
Incineration/Thermal Treatment; Institutional
Controls; Leachability Tests; Lead; MCLs; Metals;
Offeite Discharge; Offsite Treatment; O&M;
Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment; Organics;
PAHs; PCE; Relocation; Safe Drinking Water
Act; Soil; Solidification/Stabilization; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Temporary Storage;
Toluene; Treatment Technology; VOCs.
EWAN PROPERTY, NJ
Second Remedial Action - Final
September 29, 1989
The 43-acre Ewan Property site is in the New
Jersey Pinelands in Shamong Township,
Burlington County, New Jersey. The site
neighbors forests and forested wetlands, farmland,
and residences. An aquifer underlying the site
contains a plume contaminated by onsite disposal
practices. Between 1974 and 1975 the site owner
reportedly buried uncontained and drummed
hazardous wastes in an onsite disposal area. In
1982 the county was informed of the possible
hazardous waste dumping and initiated ground
water monitoring and soil sampling programs the
following year. Both the ground water and soil
within the disposal area were found to be
contaminated with VOCs and metals. This
remedial action represents the second of two
operable units for the site. The 1988 ROD
addressed the treatment of 4,500 cubic yards of
source waste including buried drums and other
heavily contaminated materials. This second
operable unit addresses the remediation of the
residual soil which will remain after
implementation of the first operable unit and the
treatment of the contaminated ground water. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the soil
and ground water are VOCs including benzene,
PCE, TCE, toluene, and xylenes; and metals
including chromium and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
excavating and treating 22,000 cubic yards of soil
using solvent extraction and soil washing, followed
by redepositing treated soil onsite as clean fill;
treating and disposing of spent solvent offcite;
treating spent wash water onsite using the ground
water treatment system; regrading and
revegetating disposal areas; pumping and
treatment of ground water followed by reinjecting
treated ground water into the underlying aquifer;
and environmental monitoring. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action is
$35,152,447 which includes annual O&M costs of
$1,903,980.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil will be treated to meet State Solid Waste
Regulations and concentrations that would not
deteriorate ground water above ground water
remedial objectives. No specific levels for soil
were provided. Ground water will meet State
water quality criteria (SWQC) to protect ground
water in the New Jersey Pinelands and Federal
and State MCLs to protect drinking water
supplies. Specific ground water treatment levels
include benzene 1 ug/1 (SWQC), TCE 1 ug/1
(SWQC), toluene 2,000 ug/1 (PMCL), xylenes 44
ug/1 (SWQC), lead 50 ug/1 (MCL), and chromium
50 ug/l (SWQC).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Benzene; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Clean Closure; Direct
Contact; Excavation; Ground Water; Ground
Water Treatment; Lead; MCLs; Metals; O&M;
Offeite Discharge; Offeite Disposal; Offeite
Treatment; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Disposal;
Onsite Treatment; PCE; RCRA; Safe Drinking
Water Act; Soil; Soil Washing/Flushing; Solvent
Extraction; State Standards/ Regulations; TCE;
Toluene; Treatability Studies; Treatment
Technology; VOCs; Wetlands; Xylenes.
FAA TECHNICAL CENTER, NJ
First Remedial Action
September 26, 1989
The 5,000-acre multipurpose FAA Technical
Center site is a Federal Facility eight miles
northwest of Atlantic City, in Atlantic County,
New Jersey. The site includes a jet fuel farm, an
air terminal, a State national guard fighter group,
the extensive facilities of the FAA Technical
Center, and the Upper Atlantic City Reservoir.
Atlantic City's municipal water supply is provided
by nine ground water supply wells located just
north of the reservoir on FAA property as well as
by water drawn directly from the reservoir. Land
use in the site vicinity includes forested land and
53
-------
commercial and residential areas. There are 25
known areas of contamination at the FAA
Technical Center. This is the first ROD for an
area of contamination at this facility. Further
areas of contamination will be addressed in future
RODs. Soil and ground water at the site are
contaminated with VOCs apparently attributable
to the jet fuel farm. Subsurface jet fuel
contamination is probably the result of leaking
pipes, storage tanks, and spills associated with
above-ground and underground storage tanks,
associated valves, piping, and dry wells, or a truck
loading stand. As an interim remedial measure,
free product recovery pumps were installed in
1988-89 in three onsite wells to recover the
hydrocarbon plume floating on the water table.
Product is currently being extracted and
incinerated offsite. The total volume of spilled
free product has been estimated at 360,000
gallons, the total volume of contaminated soil
found in two hot spot areas was estimated to be
33,000 cubic yards, and the total volume of
contaminated ground water was estimated to be
13,300,00 gallons. The jet fuel farm will be
closed within the next year as new facilities come
on line. The primary contaminants of concern
affecting the soil and ground water are VOCs
including benzene, toluene, and xylenes; and other
organics including PAHs (naphthalene) and
phenols.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
in-situ soil vacuum extraction (soil venting) and
off-gas treatment using either incineration or
activated carbon adsorption; extraction of free
product floating on the plume followed by offsite
incineration; ground water extraction and addition
of nutrients for subsequent reinjection and in-situ
biodegradation of residual ground water
contamination; and ground water monitoring.
The estimated present worth cost for this
remedial action is $583,000, which includes a total
present value O&M cost of $200,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water cleanup levels are based on State
and Federal MCLs, whichever is more stringent,
and include benzene 1 ug/1 (State MCL), xylenes
(total) 44 ug/1 (State MCL), and toluene 2,000
ug/1 (Federal MCL). Total phenols will meet the
State Ground Water Quality Standard of 300 ug/1.
The soil cleanup levels are based on State Soil
Cleanup Action Levels, which are TBCs, and
include 1 mg/kg for total priority pollutant VOCs.
For total petroleum hydrocarbons the action level
is 100 mg/kg. No chemical-specific ARARs for
soil contaminants were identified.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Benzene; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Air Act; Direct Contact;
Ground Water, Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; MCLs; O&M; Offsite
Disposal; Offeite Treatment; Onsite Discharge;
Onsite Treatment; Organics; PAHs; Phenols;
RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil; State
Guidance; State Standards/Regulations; Toluene;
Treatment Technology; Vacuum Extraction;
VOCs; Xylenes.
FULTON TERMINALS, NY
First Remedial Action - Final
September 29, 1989
The 1.6-acre Fulton Terminals site is in Fulton,
Oswego County, New York. The site is bordered
to the west by the Oswego River, and a section of
the site lies within the river's 100-year floodplain.
Commercial and industrial operations are the
primary land uses in the vicinity of the site.
Spills and leaks of chemical wastes stored in eight
tanks at the site resulted in soil and ground water
contamination. The wastes were produced by a
combination of former asphalt and roofing
manufacturing operations conducted from 1936 to
1960, and a more recent hazardous waste storage
operation. From 1972 to 1977 Fulton Terminals,
Inc., operated a staging and storage area for
hazardous wastes destined for offsite incineration.
In 1981, following a citation for not meeting
Federal and State standards for the operation of
a hazardous waste storage facility, Fulton
Terminals initiated a cleanup which included
emptying and removing four storage tanks. From
June 1986 to May 1987 EPA and the proposed
responsible parties (PRPs) undertook removal
activities which included securing the site,
removing all remaining storage tanks, excavating
and removing approximately 300 cubic yards of
contaminated soil and tar-like waste, and partially
removing and plugging a storm sewer pipe
running to the Oswego River. This remedy
54
-------
addresses the low levels of soil contamination
remaining at the site and a plume of
contaminated ground water which threatens the
Oswego River. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil and ground water are
VOCs including benzene, TCE, and xylenes; other
organics including PAHs; and metals including
arsenic.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
excavation and low temperature thermal treatment
of approximately 4,000 cubic yards of
contaminated soil and backfilling the treated soil
provided it passes the TCLP Toxicity Test;
placement of a one foot cap of clean top soil
over the site; ground water pumping and
treatment onsite using air stripping and carbon
adsorption, followed by reinjection or other type
of recharge into the aquifer; disposal of soil and
ground water treatment waste residues at a
RCRA-approved offsite hazardous waste facility;
air monitoring; and ground water monitoring for
three years. The estimated present worth cost for
this remedial action is $4,031,000, which includes
an annual O&M cost of $732,000 for 3 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil treatment levels are designed to prevent
leaching to ground water that will result in levels
above MCLs. Chemical-specific soil goals include
TCE 2 mg/kg, benzene 1.4 mg/kg, and xylenes 8
mg/kg. Ground water cleanup levels will meet
the more stringent of Federal and State drinking
water standards, including TCE 5 ug/l (MCL)
and arsenic 1,000 ug/l (MCL). Several
contaminants such as benzene, xylenes, and
certain metals may exceed drinking water
standards at the end of remediation because they
are detected at higher concentrations upgradient,
and have been determined to be naturally
occurring in the area. Naturally occurring wastes
are not addressed under Superfund.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL Institutional
controls will be applied to prevent use of the
underlying ground water due to the high
concentration of naturally occurring metals in the
ground water surrounding the site. These
controls will include well construction permits
and water quality certifications in accordance with
State law.
KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; Air Stripping;
Arsenic; Benzene; Carbon Adsorption;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Air Act; Clean
Closure; Clean Water Act; Direct Contact;
Excavation; Floodplain; Ground Water; Ground
Water Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Incineration/Thermal Destruction; Institutional
Controls; MCLs; Metals; O&M; Offsite Disposal;
Onsite Discharge; Onsite Disposal; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; PAHs; Safe Drinking Water
Act; Soil; State Standards/Regulations; TCE;
Treatment Technology; VOCs; Water Quality
Criteria; Xylenes.
GLEN RIDGE RADIUM SITE, NJ
First Remedial Action
June 30, 1989
The Glen Ridge Radium site is in the Borough
of Glen Ridge and the town of East Orange in
Essex County, New Jersey. The site covers
approximately 90 acres of residential
neighborhoods including 306 properties. The
Montclair/West Orange Radium site is adjacent
to this site and is being addressed concurrently
under one remedial action. The soil at the site
is contaminated to varying degrees with
radioactive waste materials suspected to have
originated from radium processing or utilization
facilities located nearby during the early 1900s.
The waste material was disposed of in then-rural
areas of the communities. Houses were
subsequently constructed on or near the radium
waste disposal areas. Some of the
radium-contaminated soil is believed to have been
used as fill in the low-lying areas, and some of
the fill was mixed with cement for sidewalks and
foundations. Temporary radon ventilation systems
and gamma radiation shielding have been installed
and maintained by EPA and the State to reduce
indoor exposures. In June 1985 the State
initiated a pilot study and excavated portions of
the radium-contaminated soil and disposed of the
soil offsite. The primary contaminant of concern
affecting the soil and structures is radium226 which
decays to radon gas.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
excavation of approximately 41,000 cubic yards of
highly contaminated soil and an unspecified
amount of debris followed by offsite disposal;
55
-------
installation and maintenance of indoor
engineering controls at less contaminated
properties; environmental monitoring to ensure
remedy effectiveness; and continuation of a
treatment technology study for future actions. A
final decision for the less contaminated properties
has been deferred until after the 60-day public
comment period extension. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action is
$53,000,000 with no O&M costs.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The radiums-contaminated soil will be excavated
to a concentration of 5 pCi/g above background
concentration at the surface (top 6 inches) and 15
pCi/g above background in subsurface soil.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: A decision to
implement municipal or county health ordinances
(e.g., permits for home repair or outdoor
activities, deed restrictions) was deferred as a
result of public comment.
KEYWORDS; Air Monitoring; Background
Levels; Carcinogenic Compounds; Debris;
Deferred Decision; Direct Contact; Excavation;
Filling; Institutional Controls; Interim Remedy,
Offsite Disposal; Public Exposure; Radioactive
Materials; Soil; Treatability Studies.
MARATHON BATTERY, NY
Third Remedial Action - Final
September 29, 1989
The Marathon Battery site is a former battery
manufacturing plant in Cold Spring, Putnam
County, New York. The site is composed of
three study areas: Area I, which consists of East
Foundry Cove Marsh and Constitution Marsh;
Area II, which encompasses the former plant,
presently a book storage warehouse, the
surrounding grounds, and a vault with cadmium-
contaminated sediment dredged from East
Foundry Cove; and Area III, which includes East
Foundry Cove (48 acres), West Foundry Cove and
the Hudson River in the vicinity of Cold Spring
pier and a sewer outfall. Contamination in Area
III emanates from plant wastewater that was
discharged via the city sewer system into the
Hudson River at Cold Spring Pier or, in some
instances, through a storm sewer into East
Foundry Cove. A ROD was signed for Area I in
September 1986 with cleanup activities to includes
dredging the East Foundry Cove Marsh. The
second ROD for this site was signed in
September 1988 and included decontamination of
the battery plant and soil excavation in Area II.
This 1989 ROD represents the third and final
operable unit for the site and addresses sediment
contamination in Area III. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting sediment at the
site are metals including cadmium and nickel.
The selected remedial action for the site includes
dredging of approximately 55,000 cubic yards of
cadmium-contaminated sediment in East Foundry
Cove to a depth of one foot, followed by onsite
chemical fixation and offsite disposal; sampling
and analysis of the area adjacent to and under
Cold Spring pier and dredging approximately 900
cubic yards of cadmium-contaminated sediment
from this area followed by treatment with East
Foundry Cove sediment; sediment monitoring and
performance of a hydrological study of Area III to
determine if West Foundry Cove is a depositional
area and in need of remediation; and long-term
sediment monitoring. The estimated present
worth cost for this selected remedy is $48,499,500,
which includes annual O&M costs of $21,303,330
for the first year and $132,700 for years 2-30.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The risk assessment for the site used references
doses because neither of the contaminants of
concern are considered carcinogenic. The
acceptable sediment concentration of cadmium is
220 mg/kg. Expectations are that by dredging the
upper layer of contaminated sediment, 95% of the
cadmium contamination will be removed. It is
anticipated that following remediation, cadmium
concentrations in the dredged areas will not
exceed 10 mg/kg.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Clean Water Act; Direct Contact;
Dredging; Excavation; Metals; O&M; Offsite
Disposal; Onsite Treatment; RCRA; Sediment;
State Permit; State Standards/Regulations;
Treatment Technology; Water Quality Criteria.
56
-------
MONTCLAIR/WEST ORANGE RADIUM SITE, NJ
First Remedial Action
June 30, 1989
The Monclair/West Orange Radium site is located
in the towns of Montclair and West Orange in
Essex County, New Jersey. The site covers
approximately 120 acres of residential
neighborhoods. The Glen Ridge Radium site is
adjacent to this site and is being addressed
concurrently under one remedial action. The soil
at the site is contaminated with radioactive waste
materials suspected to have originated from
radium processing or utilization facilities located
nearby during the early 1900s. The waste
material was disposed of in then-rural areas of
the communities. Houses were subsequently
constructed on or near the radium waste disposal
areas. Some of the radium-contaminated soil is
believed to have been used as fill in low-lying
areas, and some of the fill was mixed with cement
for sidewalks and foundations. Temporary radon
ventilation systems and gamma radiation shielding
have been installed and maintained by EPA and
the State to reduce indoor exposures. In June
1985 the State initiated a pilot study, excavated
portions of the radium-contaminated soil and
disposed of the soil offeite. The primary
contaminant of concern affecting the soil and
structures is radium226 which decays to radon gas.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
excavation of approximately 41,000 cubic yards of
highly contaminated soil and an unspecified
amount of debris followed by offsite disposal;
installation and maintenance of indoor
engineering controls at less contaminated
properties; environmental monitoring to ensure
remedy effectiveness; and continuation of a
treatment technology study for future actions.
EPA deferred a final decision for the less
contaminated properties until after a 60-day
public comment period extension. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action is
$53,000,000 with no O&M costs.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The radiums-contaminated soil will be excavated
to a concentration of 5 pCi/g above background
concentration at the surface (top 6 inches) and 15
pCi/g above background in subsurface soil.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: A decision to
implement municipal or county health ordinances
(e.g., permits for home repairs or outdoor
activities, deed restrictions) was deferred as a
result of public comment.
KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; Background
Levels; Carcinogenic Compounds; Debris;
Deferred Decision; Direct Contact; Excavation;
Filling; Institutional Controls; Offsite Disposal;
Public Exposure; Radioactive Materials; Soil;
Treatability Studies.
NORTH SEA MUNICIPAL LANDFILL, NY
First Remedial Action
September 29, 1989
The North Sea Municipal Landfill site is on
eastern Long Island in Southampton, Suffolk
County, New York. The site is south of Little
Peconic Bay, in an area of extensive ponds, coves,
and wetlands. The 131-acre active landfill
overlies two aquifers and is adjacent to private
homes that obtain their drinking water from
private domestic wells. Two landfill cells, a
proposed cell and a series of 14 lagoons are also
on the site. Municipal solid waste, refuse, debris,
and septic system waste from residential,
industrial, and commercial sources have been
disposed of at the site since 1963. From the
early 1960s to 1985 Cell #1 received
approximately 1.3 million cubic yards of municipal
waste and septic sludges. Subsequent ground
water monitoring revealed a contaminated plume
migrating from cell #1 toward a nearby cove.
Cell #1 was closed and partially capped in 1985,
and a storm water diversion system was also
installed to collect storm water and recharge it.
Cell #2, which was equipped with a leachate
collection system and accepted approximately
80,000 tons of municipal waste annually, has been
closed since October 1989. The town has
constructed Cell #3, which is now in operation.
From the late 1960s to 1986, 14 lagoons were
used to dispose of approximately 11 million
gallons of septic waste. The lagoons were
subsequently excavated and backfilled. This is the
first of two planned operable units and addresses
source control through remediation of Cell #1
and the former sludge lagoons. A subsequent
ROD will address ground and surface water
57
-------
contamination. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil and sludge are VOCs;
other organics including PAHs; metals including
arsenic and lead; and other inorganics.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
covering Cell #1 with a low permeability cap;
implementing site security and deed restrictions;
sampling sludge/soil in the former sludge lagoons;
and long-term air, surface water and ground water
quality monitoring. The estimated present worth
cost for this remedial action ranges from
$7,700,000 to S8.300.000, depending on the type
of landfill cap selected. These figures include an
estimated annual O&M cost ranging between
5190,000 and $200,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Capping of the landfill reduces emissions of
methane gas and VOCs and reduces percolation
of precipitation through the landfill and thus
migration of hazardous substances into ground
water. Individual contaminant goals were not
specified for this source control remedial action.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Site security
and deed restrictions will be implemented.
KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; Arsenic; Capping;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Direct Contact; Ground
Water Monitoring; Inorganics; Institutional
Controls; Leachability Tests; Lead; Metals;
Municipally Owned Site; O&M; Organics; PAHs;
Sludge; Soil; State Standards/Regulations; Surface
Water Monitoring; VOCs.
PEPE FIELD, NJ
First Remedial Action - Final
September 29, 1989
The Pepe Field site is a former disposal area in
the town of Boonton, Morris County, New Jersey.
The 3-acre site is an inactive, municipally owned
recreational facility in a predominantly residential
area. From 1935 to 1950 the E.F. Drew
Company used the site to dispose of wastes
generated from processing vegetable oils and soap
products. Materials reportedly deposited onsite
by the E.F. Drew Company were diatomaceous
earth and activated carbon filter residue,
incinerator and boiler ash, lime sludge, and soap
residue. Residents living adjacent to the site
complained about objectionable odors originating
from the site. To reduce odor emissions, the
town implemented elements of the odor
abatement program proposed by the Drew
Company. During the 1960s, the town covered
the site with soil and installed a leachate
collection and treatment system. Although these
measures reduced the the odor problems, some
incidents were still reported. Investigations
revealed gas concentrations exceeding the lower
explosive limit in the soil vapor at the perimeter
of the site and in an apparent soil gas plume
extending below the property adjacent to the site.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the soil found in the landfill include hydrogen
sulfide and methane gases.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
maintaining the site cover; installing and
maintaining a landfill gas collection and treatment
system using carbon adsorption; disposing of
carbon offsite; upgrading and maintaining the
existing leachate collection and treatment system;
ground water monitoring; and implementing deed
restrictions to prevent waste disruption. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $1,293,700, which includes an estimated
O&M cost of $108,000 for the first two years and
$93,000 for the next 28 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water and soil already meet State
drinking water standards and State action levels.
Leachate quality will comply with State
requirements for discharge either to a publicly
owned treatment works or to a nearby river.
Emissions from the gas treatment system will
comply with State air pollution regulations.
Chemical-specific cleanup goals were not
specified.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed
restrictions will be implemented to prevent waste
disruption.
KEYWORDS: Carbon Adsorption; Closure
Requirements; Direct Contact; Ground Water
Monitoring; Institutional Controls; Leachate
Collection/Treatment; Municipally Owned Site;
Offeite Disposal; O&M; Onsite Containment;
58
-------
Onsite Treatment; Soil; State Soil
Standards/Regulations; Treatment Technology;
Vacuum Extraction.
PICATINNY ARSENAL, NJ
First Remedial Action
September 28, 1989
The Picatinny Arsenal site is a munitions and
weapons research and development installation
covering 6,491 acres and containing 1,500
buildings in Morris County, near the city of
Dover, New Jersey. Ground water contamination
above State and Federal action levels has been
detected in the vicinity of Building 24, where past
wastewater treatment practices resulted in the
infiltration of metal plating waste constituents
(i.e., VOCs and heavy metals) into the ground
water. Two unlined lagoons alongside Building
24, thought to be a source of contamination, was
eliminated during a 1981 action during which the
unlined lagoons were demolished, contaminated
soil removed, and two concrete lagoons installed.
Two additional potential sources of contamination
are a dry well at Building 24 and a former drum
storage area at Building 31, directly across the
street from Building 24. This interim ground
water cleanup remedy is designed to prevent
deterioration to Green Pond Brook, a major
drainage artery onsite, while the arsenal as a
whole is evaluated. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the ground water are VOCs
including TCE, and metals.
The selected interim remedy for this site includes
ground water pumping and treatment using a
pretreatment system for the removal of metals
and solids and air stripping to remove VOCs;
GAC filtration of VOCs from the air stripper
exhaust and air stripper effluent; discharge of
treated ground water to Green Pond Brook; and
effluent and air monitoring. The estimated
capital cost for this remedial action is $2,100,000
with annual O&M costs of $1,100,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOATA
ARARs will be used to establish effluent quality
and allowable VOCs emissions; however, ARARs
for ground water cleanup will apply to the final
remedial action, not this interim action.
Chemical-specific cleanup levels, therefore, were
not established.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; ARAR Waiver;
Carbon Adsorption (GAC); Clean Air Act; Clean
Water Act; Ground Water; Ground Water
Treatment; Interim Remedy; Leachability Tests;
Metals; O&M; Onsite Discharge; Onsite
Treatment; Plume Management; RCRA; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; VOCs.
PORT WASHINGTON LANDFILL, NY
First Remedial Action
September 30, 1989
The Port Washington Landfill site is on the
eastern portion of Manhasset Neck, Nassau
County, Long Island, New York. The 139-acre
municipally owned site consists of two landfilled
areas separated by a vacant area. This ROD
addresses the 53-acre inactive landfill on the
western portion of the site, which is the suspected
source of methane gas thought to cause furnace
explosions in residences neighboring the landfill
during 1979 through 1981. From 1974 to 1983
the landfill operator accepted incinerator residue,
residential and commercial refuse, and
construction rubble for disposal. Because
extensive air monitoring, performed in 1981,
revealed high methane levels in several area
residences, a venting system was installed to
prevent subsurface gases from migrating west of
the landfill and to destroy hazardous chemicals
commonly detected in sanitary landfill gas. In
1981 the county also determined the presence of
VOC contaminants in a drinking water well
onsite, which has since been removed from
service. The primary contaminants of concern
affecting the soil and ground water are VOCs
including PCE, TCE, and benzene; and other
organics including methane gas.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
capping the landfill; rehabilitating the existing gas
collection system and installing additional vacuum
extraction vents; ground water pumping and
treatment using a metals removal process and air
stripping followed by discharge to an aquifer
59
-------
recharge basin; and environmental monitoring
using ground water and landfill gas wells. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $42,580,000, which includes a present
worth O&M cost of $16,247,000 for 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water cleanup goals are based on SDWA
MCLs and State standards for drinking water.
Chemical-specific goals were not provided.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS; Air Stripping; Benzene; Capping;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Direct Contact;
Drinking Water Contaminants; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; Landfill Closure; Leachability Tests;
MCLs; Municipally Owned Site; O&M; Onsite
Discharge; Onsite Treatment; Organics; PCE;
RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Treatment
Technology; Vacuum Extraction; Venting; VOCs.
PREFERRED PLATING, NY
First Remedial Action
September 22, 1989
The 0.5-acre Preferred Plating site is in a light
industrial area of Farmingdale, Suffolk County,
New York. The site is bordered to the east and
west by commercial and light industrial properties,
to the north by a large wooded area, and to the
south by a residential community and a U.S.
Army facility. More than 10,000 people live
within a 3-mile radius of the site. Between
September 1951 and June 1976, Preferred Plating
Corporation operated a metal treating facility that
resulted in the generation, storage, and disposal
of hazardous waste. Untreated wastewater was
discharged to four concrete leaching points
directly behind the facility. Site investigations
conducted by the county as early as 1953 revealed
heavy metal contamination of ground water and
cracked and leaking onsite leaching pits. Ground
water is used for drinking water supplies by the
entire population of both Nassau and Suffolk
counties. The nearest public water supply well
fields are located approximately one mile
southeast of the site. This operable unit
addresses the overall ground water contamination
attributable to the site; a second operable unit
will be undertaken to more fully characterize and
identify any contaminated soil and to investigate
potential upgradient sources of contamination.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the ground water are VOCs including TCE and
PCE, and metals including chromium and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
pumping and onsite treatment of contaminated
ground water using metal precipitation, carbon
adsorption, and ion exchange followed by
reinjection of the treated ground water; offsite
disposal of 220 gallons per day of wet cake
generated by the water treatment plant and spent
carbon filters to a RCRA subtitle C facility; and
periodic ground water monitoring. The estimated
present worth cost is $9,327,400 for 12 years with
an annual O&M cost of $920,900.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Onsite ground water cleanup standards for the
contaminants of concern were based on SDWA
MCLs and State Ground Water Quality
Regulations. Because this ROD is only part of
a total remedial action that will include another
operable unit, the selected remedy by itself will
not meet all chemical-specific ARARs or be
capable of restoring area ground water to ground
water quality standards until upgradient source
areas are removed. In the event a second
operable unit fails to identify or control the
source area, a waiver for technical impracticability
will be sought.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Carbon Adsorption; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Clean Water Act;
Contingency Remedy; Drinking Water
Contaminants; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment; Lead;
MCLs; Metals; O&M; Offsite Disposal; Onsite
Discharge; Onsite Treatment; PCE; RCRA; Safe
Drinking Water Act; State Standards/Regulations;
TCE; Treatability Studies; Treatment Technology;
VOCs; Water Quality Criteria.
60
-------
SMS INSTRUMENTS (DEER PARK), NY
First Remedial Action
September 29, 1989
The 1.5-acre SMS Instruments site is in a light
industrial and residential area of Deer Park,
Suffolk County, New York. Since 1967 the site
has been operated as an industrial facility which
overhauls military aircraft components. Past
waste disposal practices included discharging
untreated wastewater from degreasing and other
refurbishing operations to an underground
leaching pool. In 1980 the site owner removed
800 gallons of VOC- and metal-contaminated
wastewater from the pool, and subsequently filled
it with sand and sealed all drain pipes. In 1981
the county required the site owner to leak test a
6,000 gallon underground storage tank (UST)
used to store jet fuel. Because tests indicated
leakage, the tank was emptied and, in 1988, was
excavated and removed. This ROD represents the
first of two operable units at the site and
addresses ground water and soil contamination.
Source areas include the former UST area, the
leaching pool, and spill areas where wastes were
formerly stored in drums. A subsequent operable
unit will investigate suspected sources of
upgradient contamination. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil and
ground water are VOCs including PCE, TCE, and
xylenes; and metals including chromium and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
treating approximately 1,250 cubic yards of soil
using in-situ steam stripping or air stripping
depending on the results of a planned treatability
study; and ground water pumping and treatment
using air stripping followed by reinjection through
onsite wells. The contingency plan for soil
remediation includes excavation and offcite
incineration of contaminated soil. The estimated
present worth cost for the selected remedial
action is $1,195,800, which includes an annual
present worth O&M cost of $437,576.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Treated ground water will meet State and Federal
drinking water standards prior to reinjection.
Specific ground water cleanup goals include TCE
5 ug/1 (MCL), PCE 0.7 ug/1 (State); xylenes 5 ug/1
(State), chromium 50 ug/l (MCL), and lead 25
ug/1 (State). Soil will be treated until all VOC
contaminants of concern attain a soil contaminant
level of less than 10 ug/kg.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Contingent Remedy;
Decontamination; Direct Contact; Drinking Water
Contaminants; Ground Water; Ground Water
Treatment; Lead; MCLs; Metals; Offeite Disposal;
O&M; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment; PCE;
Plume Management; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water
Act; Soil; Sole-Source Aquifer; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Treatabiliry Studies;
Treatment Technology; Vacuum Extraction;
VOCs; Xylenes.
VINELAND CHEMICAL, NJ
First Remedial Action
September 28, 1989
The Vineland Chemical site is in Vineland,
Cumberland County, New Jersey. The site is in
a residential/industrial area and borders the
Blackwater Branch stream a tributary to the
Maurice River, which ultimately flows into Union
Lake. The Vineland facility consists of several
herbicide manufacturing and storage facilities, a
wastewater treatment facility, and several lagoons.
The facility produces approximately 1,107 tons of
herbicide waste by-product salts, EPA hazardous
waste number K 031, each year which were stored
onsite in uncontrolled piles on the soil, in the
unlined lagoons, and in abandoned chicken coops.
Furthermore, arsenic-contaminated wastewater
was discharged into unlined lagoons until 1980
when Vineland Chemical Company began
treating wastewater. Since 1978 hazardous waste
salts produced at the site have no longer been
stored onsite for more than 90 days and are
disposed of offsite by licensed shippers; however,
the past improper storage of those salts have
resulted in extensive arsenic contamination of soil,
sediment, and ground water because of the high
solubility of the salts. The ground water
underneath the plant discharges into the
Blackwater Branch stream and has resulted in
contamination of sediment in Blackwater Branch,
the Maurice River, and Union Lake. The site has
been divided into four discrete operable units to
facilitate remediation: sediment in the 870-acre
61
-------
Union Lake; sediment in the Maurice River and
Blackwater Branch stream areas; soil associated
with the Vineland Chemical Company facility; and
ground water underlying the site. The primary
contaminant of concern affecting the soil,
sediment, and ground water is arsenic.
The selected remedial actions for this site will be
implemented in four discrete operable units
(OUs). OU 1, the plant site source control, will
include in-situ flushing of 126,000 cubic yards of
arsenic-contaminated soil, 54,000 cubic yards of
which will be excavated and consolidated with
72,000 cubic yards of undisturbed soil;
decontaminating onsite storage buildings (chicken
coops); and closing two impoundments followed
by offsite treatment and disposal of the
wastewater and sludge recovered from the
impoundments. OU 2, the plant site ground
water, will include ground water pumping and
treatment followed either by reinjection, offsite
discharge to the Maurice River, or reuse for soil
flushing; and offsite treatment and disposal of
residue sludge from ground water treatment. OU
3, the stream and river areas sediment, will
include excavating, dredging, and treating 62,600
cubic yards of exposed and buried sediment from
the Blackwater Branch and its floodplain using
water wash extraction followed by onsite
redeposition of treated sediment; treating and
offsite disposal of sludge residue from the water
wash extraction process; implementing a
three-year period of natural river flushing for the
Maurice River sediment after remediating the
arsenic-contaminated ground water; and selection
of a water wash contingent remedy for the river
sediments if levels persist above action levels.
OU 4, an interim remedy for the Union Lake
sediment, will include dredging, excavating, and
treating sediment from Union Lake using water
wash extraction followed by redeposition into the
lake; treating and disposing of sludge residue
offsite; and sediment and surface water
monitoring. The estimated present worth cost
for these remedial actions is $66,384,636, which
includes estimated annual O&M costs of
$3,463,463 for the short term and $38,010 for the
long term for the plant source control, stream
and river sediment, and lake sediment operable
units; and a present worth O&M cost of
55,155,053 for the ground water operable unit.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil, sediment, and ground water cleanup goals
for arsenic are based on 10"* health-based levels
and MCLs. Specific goals include 20 mg/kg (soil
and surface sediment), 120 mg/kg (submerged
sediment), and 50 ug/1 (ground water).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable
(may be determined and implemented at a later
date).
KEYWORDS: ACL; Arsenic; Closure
Requirements; Decontamination; Direct Contact;
Dredging; Excavation; Filling; Floodplain; Ground
Water; Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; Interim Remedy; Leachability Tests;
MCLs; Metals; O&M; Oflsite Discharge; Offcite
Disposal; Offeite Treatment; Onsite Disposal;
Onsite Treatment; Plume Management; RCRA;
Safe Drinking Water Act; Sediment; Soil; Soil
Washing/Flushing; State Standards/Regulations;
Surface Water Monitoring; Treatability Studies;
Treatment Technology; Wetlands.
VINELAND STATE SCHOOL, NJ
First Remedial Action - Final
September 30, 1989
The 195-acre Vineland State School site is in the
northern part of the city of Vineland, Cumberland
County, New Jersey. The site, commonly referred
to as the Vineland Developmental Center, is a
residential treatment facility for mentally
handicapped women and is comprised of
numerous buildings to care for the 1,300
residents. In addition to the facility, the site
includes farmland, a hospital care facility, facility
maintenance shops, and an unregulated
incinerator. The site overlies three aquifers which
serve as major sources of drinking water for the
county. There were numerous allegations of
improper waste disposal at five separate onsite
subsites. Subsite 1, a former landfill which has
since been covered and vegetated, reportedly had
been used to dump mercury- and
arsenic-contaminated pesticides. Data from the
remedial investigation, however, could not confirm
these allegations. At subsite 2, PCB-contaminated
fluid spilled and spread over a 1-acre area. The
State remediated subsite 2 in 1988, which
included demolishing and disposing of
62
-------
approximately 3,900 tons of PCB-contaminated
soil and concrete pads offeite. Subsite 3 was a
garbage dump for 10 years before being backfilled
and used as a baseball field. Subsites 4 and 5
were pits where transformer oils and chemicals
were dumped in the mid 1950s. Investigation
results of the subsites excluding subsite 2, which
was cleaned up in 1988, revealed only low levels
of contamination.
The selected remedial action for this site is no
further action. The risks posed by the
contamination in these areas are within the
acceptable range as determined by the State and
EPA As a precautionary measure, however,
ground water and disposal areas will be
monitored. No costs were specified for this
remedial action.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Not applicable.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Ground Water Monitoring; No
Action Remedy.
63
-------
RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
REGION HI
(Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia)
AMBLER ASBESTOS PILES, PA
Second Remedial Action - Final
September 29, 1989
The Ambler Asbestos Piles site is in the
southwestern portion of the Borough of Ambler,
Montgomery County, Pennsylvania. This second
operable unit for the site addresses the
CertainTeed asbestos pile portion of the Ambler
Asbestos site. The CertainTeed asbestos pile
contains asbestos scrap materials and encompasses
approximately 3.5 acres of a 5-acre tract. Land
around the site is used for industrial, commercial,
residential, and transportation purposes. The site
is bordered to the southeast by the Stuart Farm
Creek floodplain and associated wetlands system,
and to the west by the Wissahickon Creek
floodplain. The CertainTeed pile was created by
the disposal of asbestos-cement scrap originating
from asbestos pipe manufacturing operations at
the CertainTeed plant. In addition,
asbestos-contaminated sludge from a process
water treatment settling pond was also disposed
of at the site. Asbestos waste disposal continued
from 1962 until 1977 when the State ordered the
CertainTeed pile closed. At present the pile
contains approximately 110,000 cubic yards of
asbestos-related waste material which is covered
by approximately 22,000 cubic yards of soil
Several inorganic contaminants have also been
detected in the soil and debris of the pile as well
as in surface water and sediment from Stuart
Farm Creek. Because the actual sources of the
inorganic contaminants in the creek have not
been identified, a verification study will be
performed to define the source of these
contaminants. The primary contaminant of
concern affecting the soil, sediment, debris, and
surface water is asbestos.
The selected remedial action for the site includes
regrading the pile plateau to promote proper
storm water drainage; placing a soil cover with
geotextile reinforcement on portions of the pile
plateau and slope where the soil cover is less
than two feet deep; performing a verification
study to determine the source of inorganics in
Stuart Farm Creek; installing erosion control
devices to protect the toe of the pile from
scouring by Stuart Farm Creek; implementing
erosion and sedimentation controls to facilitate
vegetation; restricting site access; monitoring air
and surface water; and post-closure maintenance.
The estimated present worth cost for this
remedial action is $753,000, which includes annual
O&M costs of $21,700 for the first 5 years and
$10,200 for years 6-30.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
This remedy addresses containment of
asbestos-contaminated debris; therefore, no
cleanup level is provided for the debris.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls will be established to restrict future land
use to surficial activities by authorized personnel.
KEYWORDS: Air; Air Monitoring; ARAR
Waiver; Asbestos; Capping; Clean Air Act;
Debris; Floodplain; Institutional Controls; O&M;
Sediment; Soil; State Permit; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water; Surface
Water Monitoring; Toxic Substances Control Act;
Wetlands.
BALLY GROUND WATER
CONTAMINATION, PA
First Remedial Action
June 30, 1989
The Bally Ground Water Contamination site is a
municipal water supply well field in the Borough
of Bally in Berks County, near the Philadelphia
metropolitan area. The Bally Well Field and the
springs to the northwest of the site are the public
water sources for approximately 1,200 Bally
residents. The area near the site includes
wetlands to the north and a manufacturing plant
(the plant) 1,000 feet to the south of one of Bally
Well Field's municipal wells (Well No. 3). Since
the 1930s degreasing solvents containing
methylene chloride, TCA, methanol, toluene, and
TCE have been used in manufacturing at the
64
-------
plant. One of the plant's facilities includes a drum
storage area which contains empty drums, waste
oil, and spent degreasers. A 1982 State water
quality check identified the plant as a source of
VOC contamination in Daily's municipal wells.
Former lagoons underlie the plant and are also
considered potential sources of aquifer
contamination. From December 1982 to March
1987 the Borough of Bally did not use the
contaminated Municipal Well No. 3 for water
supply although the water was periodically
pumped and discharged into a nearby pond to
contain the contaminant plume. Pumping,
however, had the effect of drawing VOCs deeper
into the aquifer. The well was completely shut
down in March 1987. Results of additional
ground water contamination studies indicated that
19 of 35 wells sampled, contained detectable
levels of VOCs. Currently a plume of
VOC-contaminated ground water extends from
the plant to the east and northeast. Plume
contaminant movement has become more
controlled since pumping and air stripping pilot
testing began at Well No. 3. Ground water is the
focus of this remediation because no remaining
source of VOC contamination has been identified
on the site. The primary contaminants of concern
affecting the ground water are VOCs including
TCE.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
abandoning appropriate wells in the attainment
area; pumping and treatment of ground water
from Municipal Well No. 3 by air stripping with
either vapor phase carbon, regenerable vapor
phase carbon, or vapor phase catalytic oxidation,
followed by discharging treated water to an
adjacent stream or into the municipal potable
water system, as needed, to provide a suitable
alternative water supply, implementation of
institutional controls restricting the use of
operable private wells and the construction of
new wells within the attainment area; and
performing ground water and surface water
monitoring to measure contaminant concentration
and migration. The estimated present worth cost
for this remedial action ranges from $2,950,000 to
$3,640,000, which includes O&M costs from
$105,000 to $189,000 depending on the chosen
treatment option.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water will be treated to meet MCLs or
PMCLS when final MCLs are unavailable.
Chemical-specific goals include TCE 0.005 mg/1
(MCL).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls will be implemented to restrict the use
of operable private wells and the construction of
new wells.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Alternate Water
Supply; Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act;
Drinking Water Contaminants; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; Institutional Controls; Interim
Remedy; MCLs; O&M; Onsite Discharge; Onsite
Treatment; PCE; Plume Management; Public
Exposure; Safe Drinking Water Act; Sole-Source
Aquifer; Solvents; State Standards/Regulations;
State Permit; Surface Water Monitoring; TCE;
Treatability Studies; VOCs; Water Quality
Criteria; Wetlands.
CRAIG FARM DRUM, PA
First Remedial Action - Final
September 29, 1989
The Craig Farm Drum site covers approximately
117 acres near the village of Fredericksburg in
Armstrong County, Pennsylvania. The area
around the site is dominated by farmland and
forest, and a creek crosses the southern portion
of the site. The site consists of two abandoned
strip mine pits which were later used for disposal
of distillation residue containing resorcinol and
other high polymers. From 1958 to 1963 the
Koppers Chemical Co. disposed of 2,500 tons of
resorcinol production residue in 55-gallon drums
in the pits. Resorcinol is an organic compound
used as an adhesive enhancer in commercial
products such as tires and Pharmaceuticals.
Investigations in 1984 revealed that the majority
of drums were broken or crushed and were
without lids. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil and ground water are
VOCs including benzene; other organics including
phenols; metals including lead and chromium; and
other inorganics.
65
-------
The selected remedial action for this site includes
excavation of 32,000 cubic yards of soil from the
two disposal pits and surrounding area with onsite
solidification; placement of treated soil in a newly
excavated and lined onsite landfill followed by
capping; passive collection of ground water using
a seep interceptor system with offsite treatment;
and performance of a ground water verification
study. The estimated present worth cost for this
remedial action is $5,188,000, which includes
estimated annual O&M costs of $124,000 for 30
years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil will be excavated until the organic compound
resorcinol is no longer detectable (<50 mg/kg).
Ground water performance levels include benzene
0.005 mg/1 (MCL), phenol 3.5 mg/1 (AWQC),
chromium 0.05 mg/1 (MCL), and lead 0.05 mg/1
(MCL).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed notices
will be implemented to notify property owners of
contaminants at the site.
KEYWORDS; Benzene; Capping; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Clean Water Act; Direct
Contact; Excavation; Ground Water; Ground
Water Treatment; Inorganics; Institutional
Controls; Lead; Metals, MCLs; O&M; Offsite
Disposal; Offsite Treatment; Onsite Disposal;
Onsite Treatment; Organics; Phenols; Plume
Management; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act;
Soil; Solidification/Stabilization; State
Standards/Regulations; Treatability Studies;
Treatment Technology, VOCs; Wetlands.
CROYDON TCE, PA
First Remedial Action
December 28, 1988
The Croydon TCE site is located in Bristol
Township, Bucks County, Pennsylvania. VOC
contamination in the ground water has been
detected over a 3.5-square mile area referred to
as the study area. The study area is
predominantly residential with an estimated 3,000
residents. A small southeastern portion of the
study area containing elevated levels of VOCs,
particularly TCE, and numerous potential source
areas have been identified and are referred to
collectively as the "focused area of investigation."
This smaller area is composed of the Croyden
residential community and several manufacturing
and commercial establishments. The study area
is bordered on the south by the Delaware River.
Neshaminy Creek, which borders the study area to
the west, and Hog Run Creek which flows
through the focused area of investigation, both
discharge to the river. Although the source of
contamination has not been identified, the
contaminant plume appears to be flowing
south-southeast into the East Branch of Hog Run
Creek and probably into the Delaware River.
EPA identified the Croyden site following a series
of studies beginning in 1984 conducted on the
Rohm & Haas site, an industrial landfill, located
on the southern boundary of the site. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
ground water are VOCs including TCE and PCE.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
connecting approximately 13 residences to the
public water supply system via the construction of
new water services lines, mains, hydrants, and
valves; and ground water monitoring to ensure
that homes located outside of the
TCE-contaminated zone will not be at risk from
the migrating plume. The estimated present worth
cost for this remedial action is $106,000 with
annual O&M cost of $3,400 for 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
This operable unit does not address treatment of
contaminated soil or water. The remedy will
prevent human exposure to concentrations of
TCE in excess of Federal, State and local
health-based ARARs.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Alternate Water Supply; Direct
Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants; Ground
Water; Ground Water Monitoring; Interim
Remedy; O&M; PCE; TCE; VOCs.
66
-------
CRYOCHEM,PA
First Remedial Action
September 29, 1989
The 19-acre CryoChem site is a metal fabricating
facility in the village of Worman, Earl Township,
Berks County, Pennsylvania. The facility consists
of a workshop area, a warehouse, and an office
building which are all located in the southern
four acres of the site. Between 1970 and 1982,
Cryochem reportedly used chemical solvents to
clean dye from metal welds at a rate of two to
three 55-gallon drums per year. The facility also
reported that a solvent spill had occurred at
some unspecified time in the past. Spilled solvent
is suspected to have collected in the workshop
drains and flowed, through underground channels,
towards a stream that flows across the site.
Spilled solvent has also migrated through the soil
column and has contaminated the ground water
underlying the site. Ground water samples,
collected between 1981 and 1985 by the State and
EPA, revealed that an onsite production well,
nearby residential wells, and onsite soil have been
contaminated. As a result of drinking water
contamination, EPA installed activated carbon
filters in 13 homes in 1987. This ROD, the first
of two operable units, addresses the distribution
of clean water to residents whose water supply is
affected or potentially affected by ground water
contamination. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the ground water are VOCs
including TCA, DCA, TCE, DCE, and PCE.
The selected remedial action for this first
operable unit includes installation of
dual-activated carbon adsorption units or
continued maintenance of existing carbon units
at affected homes until a permanent clean water
supply is developed; implementation of periodic
sampling at potentially affected homes;
construction of a new uncontaminated water
supply to serve affected and potentially affected
residences and businesses; and periodic sampling
of residents outside the affected area. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $1,260,000 which includes annual O&M
costs of $80,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water will meet SDWA MCLs or an
excess cancer-risk level less than 10"* if an MCL
has not been developed for a particular chemical.
Target cleanup levels for ground water include
TCA 200 ug/1 (MCL), DCA 0.38 ug/1 (based on a
10-* cancer risk), TCE 5 ug/1 (MCL), DCE 7 ug/l
(MCL), and PCE 0.66 ug/1 (based on a 10"* cancer
risk).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Alternate Water Supply; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Drinking Water Contaminants; MCLs; O&M;
PCE; Safe Drinking Water Act; TCE; VOCs.
DOUGLASSVILLE DISPOSAL, PA
Second Remedial Action - Final
June 30, 1989
The Douglassville Disposal site is a 50-acre
abandoned waste oil processing facility in Union
Township, Berks County, Pennsylvania. The area
surrounding the site includes agricultural land,
residences, and light industrial development. The
site lies almost entirely within the 100-year
floodplain of the Schuylkill River, which borders
the site to the north and east. The Schuylkill
River is used for municipal and industrial water
supply, recreational purposes, and waste
assimilation. Further downstream of the site,
seven public water supply users draw water from
the Schuylkill River. From 1941 to 1979 the site
operated as a lubrication oil and waste solvent
recycling facility. Wastes generated from the
recycling processes were stored onsite in several
lagoons. The site consists of a former waste oil
processing area and various waste disposal areas.
Because of the site's size and the complexity of
the various onsite activities, the site has been
divided into 10 source areas of contamination.
Disposal areas include two backfilled sludge
disposal lagoons (source areas 4 and 5), an oily
filter cake disposal area (source area 2), an oil
drum storage area (source area 8), an area where
waste oil sludge was landfarmed into the soil
(source areas 3 and 6), the former processing
facility/tank farm area (source area 1), a small
backfilled lagoon (source area 9), an old
incinerator (source area 7), and an area of scrap
metal and tanks (source area 10). In 1970 heavy
rain caused a lagoon to overflow and breach
safety dikes; two to seven million gallons of waste
67
-------
flowed into the Schuylkill River. Two years later,
a hurricane caused the Schuylkill River to
overflow its banks and inundate the entire site,
releasing an estimated six to eight million gallons
of waste. EPA subsequently drained and
backfilled the lagoons. Beginning in 1979
operations changed to refining waste oils for use
as fuel in industrial boilers. Oily wastewater
sludge from the refining process was landfarmed
in the area until 1981, when the State mandated
operational corrections to the landfarming
practices. All operations ceased in 1985. The
1988 ROD addressed the risks associated with the
former processing facility/tank farm area, which
were impediments to any future soil and ground
water remediation. This second and final
response action addresses soil and ground water
contamination remaining after the former
processing facility/tank farm and associated wastes
have been removed offsite. This ROD also
amends, in part, the 1985 ROD, which outlined
the remedial action for the source areas
designated as 2, 4, and 5 but which deferred a
decision regarding ground water contamination.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the soil, sediment, and ground water are VOCs
including benzene, toluene, and vinyl chloride;
other organics including PAHs, PCBs, and phenol;
and metals including lead.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
excavation and onsite thermal treatment of 48,400
cubic yards of soil and sludge from source area 2,
and 600 cubic yards of oily sediment from the
drainage ditch that runs from source area 9,
followed by backfilling ash residue into source
area 2; covering the backfilled area with clean soil
followed by revegetation; capping of source areas
1, 4, and 5 with one foot of fly ash and two feet
of soil followed by revegetation; if ash residues
exceed EP toxicity levels, solidification would be
required prior to onsite disposal; capping source
areas 3, 6, and 9 (approximately 10 acres) with
one foot of clean soil followed by revegetation;
implementing institutional controls to prevent soil
disturbance and well drilling; ground water and
surface water monitoring; and establishing ACLs
for ground water. The estimated present worth
cost for this remedial action ranges from
539,430,000 to 353,769,000 depending on whether
ash residue requires solidification prior to
disposal.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS;
The selected remedy will treat soil that exceeds
a 10"* cancer-risk level. Ground water protection.
standards will be ACLs and will be established as
the maximum existing concentration measured in
the monitoring wells. The ACLs include benzene
2,000 ug/l, toluene 2,300 ug/1, vinyl chloride 1,200
ug/1, phenol 7.1 ug/1, and lead 227 ug/1. Lead
emissions to the air will not exceed National
Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and
State air quality standards which are set for lead
at 1.5 ug/m3 (on a quarterly average).
INSTnUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls will be implemented to restrict area
access and ground water use.
KEYWORDS: ACL; Benzene; Capping;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Air Act; Closure
Requirements; Excavation; Floodplain; Ground
Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Incineration/Thermal Destruction; Institutional
Controls; Lead; Metals; Onsite Disposal; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; PAHs; PCBs; Phenols;
RCRA; ROD Amendment; Sediment; Soil;
Solidification/Stabilization; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water Monitoring;
Toluene; Toxic Substances Control Act;
Treatability Studies; VOCs; Wetlands.
HAVERTOWN PCP, PA
First Remedial Action
September 29, 1989
The Havertown PCP site is in Havertown,
Delaware County, Pennsylvania, approximately 10
miles west of Philadelphia. This 12- to 15-acre
site consists of a wood treatment facility, an
adjacent manufacturing facility, and Naylors Run
Creek which drains the area. Land use in the
vicinity of the site consists of commercial and
residential properties. Contamination at the site
is due to improper disposal of wastes generated
from wood preserving operations. From 1947 to
1963 PCP-contaminated oil was dumped into a
well which drained into ground water beneath the
facility. In 1972 the State identified contaminated
ground water discharging from a storm sewer into
Naylors Run. From 1976 to 1982 EPA
performed containment activities including
installing filter fences in Naylors Run and sealing
68
-------
a sanitary sewer pipe. In 1988 EPA installed a
catch basin in Naylors Run to trap discharge from
the storm sewer pipe. Other onsite wastes
include five holding tanks filled with PCP- and
VOC-contaminated wastewater and numerous
55-gallon drums of unanalyzed waste materials.
This ROD, the first of two operable units, will
address the remediation of surface water and the
disposal of drummed and tanked wastes. A
subsequent ROD will address the impact of
contaminated soil on ground water contamination
at the site. The primary contaminants of concern
affecting the surface water are VOCs including
benzene, toluene, and TCE; other organics
including phenols, dioxins, PCP, and PAHs;
metals including arsenic and chromium; and oils.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
offsite land disposal of 200 drums of soil and oily
debris, and offsite treatment and disposal of 6,000
gallons of wastewater stored in onsite tanks; soil
monitoring; installing and operating an oil/water
separator at the storm sewer effluent point to
Naylors Run; multimedia monitoring; and
implementation of site access restrictions. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $1,158,200, which includes an estimated
annual O&M cost of $110,000 for years 1-5 and
$45,000 for years 6-30.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Cleanup goals for the site are based on a 10"* risk
level. Specific surface water cleanup goals include
reducing the discharge of PCP-contaminated oil to
Naylors Run to less than 5 mg/1 which translates
to a surface water concentration of 17 ug/1. In
addition, surface water concentrations for
benzene, toluene, TCE and other VOCs will be
reduced by 17%.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; ARAR Waiver;
Arsenic; Benzene; Carcinogenic Compounds;
Chromium; Clean Closure; Clean Water Act;
Debris; Dioxin; Direct Contact; Floodplain;
Metals; O&M; Offsite Disposal; Offsite
Treatment; Oils; Onsite Discharge; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; PAHs; Phenols; RCRA;
State Standards/Regulations; Surface Water;
Surface Water Monitoring; Surface Water
Treatment; Monitoring; TCE; Toluene; VOCs.
HEBELKA AUTO SALVAGE YARD, PA
First Remedial Action
March 31, 1989
The 20-acre Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard site is
in a rural area of the Weisenburg Township in
Lehigh County, Pennsylvania. The site is
bordered primarily by agricultural fields;
however, three residences are located on or
immediately adjacent to the site. From 1958 to
1979, the property was used as an automobile
junkyard with intermittent periods of activity
involving salvage operations. Debris including
two large piles of battery casings, empty drums,
junk cars, and scrap metal were accumulated
onsite. A site inspection in December 1985
revealed lead in soil downgradient from the
battery piles, and chromium in downgradient
sediment. Lead concentrations were highest in
surface soil samples (<3ft) ranging from
200-65,000 mg/kg. This ROD addresses source
control; a second operable unit will address
migration pathways such as downgradient
sediment and ground water. The primary
contaminant of concern at the site is lead.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
excavation and onsite fixation of 5,000 cubic yards
of soil, followed by offsite disposal of treated soil
at a sanitary landfill; excavation and recycling of
1,000 cubic yards of battery casings; and soil
backfilling and revegetation. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action ranges
from $6,073,436 to $6,884,652; the greater cost
reflects the additional expense of disposing of the
battery casings if recycling is impractical. No
O&M costs are expected.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The soil will be excavated down to a lead
concentration of 560 mg/kg based on health-risk
calculations.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Debris; Excavation; Leachability
Tests; Lead; Metals; Offsite Disposal; Onsite
Treatment; Soil; Solidification/Stabilization.
69
-------
HENDERSON ROAD, PA
Second Remedial Action - Final
September 29, 1989
The Henderson Road site is a 7.6-acre site in
Upper Merion Township, Pennsylvania. The site
was used for waste storage, waste recycling,
vehicle maintenance, and parking and office
facilities between 1974 and 1989. The area
surrounding the site is zoned for industrial and
residential use. The site is bounded by the
Pennsylvania Turnpike, the Conrail property
including train tracks, Henderson Road, and Frog
Run. The Upper Merion Reservoir, located 2,000
feet downgradient of the site, serves as part of the
water source for approximately 228,000 people.
Prior to 1974 the site was operated by the Ellis
Concrete Company as a concrete preparation
plant. In 1974, William J. O'Hara, Inc. began
landfilling trash and construction debris on
cetUral and eastern portions of the site until 1984.
Between 1974 and 1977, William J. O'Hara, Inc.
allegedly injected industrial waste into a 160-foot
onsite well. Furthermore, liquid waste, sludge,
and drums may have been disposed of in the
landfill. The first operable unit for this site, as
described in a June 1988 ROD, included pumping
and treatment, using air strippers, of
contaminated ground water. This will be
accompanied by additional characterization of the
injection well, excavation of oil pit sediment if
found, removal of significant waste within the well
if feasible, institutional controls, further
characterization of saturated and unsaturated
zones, possibly direct treatment in the unsaturated
zone, monitoring, and periodic evaluation of
cleanup goals. The second operable unit
addresses all surface sources of contamination at
the site. The primary contaminants of concern
affecting the injection well operable unit are
VOCs including benzene, toluene, PCE, and TCE;
and other organics including PAHs. Most of the
chemicals of concern for the injection well
operable unit are organics. The risk assessment
for the landfill operable unit (LOU) was based on
the prediction of movement of leachate to ground
water. Of the 19 chemicals of concern identified
for the LOU, bis (2-chloroethyl) ether and six
volatilcs are considered by EPA to pose the
greatest threat to ground water. Other potential
routes of exposure include those from ingestion
of soil and inhalation of fugitive emissions.
The selected remedial action for this operable
unit includes installation of erosion controls;
regrading and capping, including possibly moving
the onsite water main; installing a short- and
long-term leachate collection system with
treatment and discharge to be determined during
design; excavation and movement of trash, soil,
and cinder currently located at the adjacent
Turnpike property, with appropriate remediation
of wastes left in place at the Turnpike property;
further sample collection and data evaluation in
the western portion of the site leading to a
determination regarding treatment and/or capping
in that area, and contingent ground water
recovery; monitoring of ground water and
leachate; and institutional controls. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $7,265,000, which includes an annual
O&M cost of $213,260.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Treatment prescribed for this LOU is designed to
achieve an onsite risk of 4.2 x 10"*. Soil cleanup
is based on depth from surface not on
concentrations of contaminants. Cleanup
standards for the aquifer, which has been
considered as Class IIA, are identified consistently
for both operable units and are based on the
most conservative value derived from the
following: MCLs, MCLGs, aquatic water quality
criteria, drinking water equivalent levels, suggested
no-adverse effect levels, models developed during
the risk assessment, processes described in the
Superfund Public Health Evaluation Manual, and
specific values developed by EPA where no other
ARARs exist. MCLs were used where available.
ACLs are proposed for 1,1-dichloroethane,
1,2-dichloroethane, benzene, 1,2-dichloropropane,
and trichloroethene. Chemical-specific ARARs
are proposed in the LOU ROD for 56
constituents.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls will be used to restrict activities that
would interfere with remediation at the site.
KEYWORDS: Alternate Concentration Limits
(ACL); Benzene; Capping; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Water Act; Debris; Direct
Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants;
Excavation; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Institutional Controls; Leachate
70
-------
Collection/Treatment; MCLs; MCLGs; O&M;
Onsite Containment; Onsite Disposal; Organics;
PAHs; PCE; Plume Management; RCRA; Safe
Drinking Water Act; Soil; Solvents; Surface Water
Collection/Diversion; TCE; Toluene; VOCs.
KIMBERTON SHE, PA
Second Remedial Action - Final
June 30, 1989
The Kimberton site is in Chester County,
Pennsylvania, near the Philadelphia metropolitan
area. The site encompasses an industrial
production plant currently owned by Monsey
Products Company, Inc., and adjacent properties
within the neighboring village of Kimberton.
Water quality testing since 1981 has revealed
numerous area domestic and commerical potable
well water supplies contaminated with VOCs. A
portion of this contamination originated from the
onsite industrial production plant, which disposed
of wastes in several lagoons during the 1950s. An
EPA investigation in the spring of 1982 revealed
the presence of organics, including TCE and
DCE, in local ground water, surface water, and
soil. In mid-1982, fifty seven, 55-gallon drums
from an abandoned onsite septic system were
excavated, removed, and disposed of offsite. In
1984 a remedial action program was initiated to
excavate, remove, and dispose of approximately
2,050 cubic yards of soil from three former lagoon
areas that were highly contaminated with VOCs.
These lagoons are in proximity to numerous
private water supply wells and less than one mile
from French Creek, which is used for public
recreation and fishing. VOCs are believed to
ultimately discharge to surface waters to the north
and east in the village of Kimberton via the
ground water. In 1985, 67 residential and
commercial wells were sampled and found to
contain various concentrations of TCE, DCE, and
vinyl chloride. As a result of these findings, the
former and current owners of the plant agreed to
provide 23 residential and commercial locations
with an alternate source of drinking and contact
water as an interim solution under the first
operable unit. This second operable unit addresses
the contaminated plume and the source of
contamination. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the ground water and surface
water are VOCs including TCE and DCE.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
the continued provision of alternate water
supplies through GAC treatment system and/or
potable water supply storage tanks; pumping and
treatment of ground water using an air stripping
system with onsite discharge to an adjacent
stream; long-term ground water monitoring;
collection and treatment of surface water at the
local ground water discharge point using an air
stripping system; and institutional controls to
restrict ground water use. The estimated present
worth cost of this remedial action is $2,630,000,
which includes annual O&M costs of $175,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The current goal of ground water remediation is
to achieve natural background conditions.
Ground water will gradually meet MCLs through
air stripping, natural flushing, and VOC
degradation. VOC-contaminated ground water
will be treated to attain MCLs including TCE 5
ugA, DCE 7 ug/1, and vinyl chloride 2 ug/1
Surface water will be treated to meet ambient
water quality criteria including TCE 21,900-45,000
ug/1 and DCE 11,600 ug/1. Because the site is
located in a nonattainment area for ozone, air
emissions from the air stripping system will
comply with State air toxic guidelines.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls will be implemented to restrict the
installation and use of new ground water
extraction wells within the area affected by
ground water contamination.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Alternate Water
Supply; Background Levels; Carbon Adsorption
(GAC); Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act; Direct
Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants; Ground
Water; Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; Institutional Controls; MCLs; O&M;
Onsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment; Plume
Management; Safe Drinking Water Act; State
Standards/Regulations; State Permit; Surface
Water; Surface Water Collection/ Diversion;
Surface Water Monitoring; TCE; Treatment
Technology; VOCs; Water Quality Criteria.
71
-------
M.W. MANUFACTURING, PA
First Remedial Action
March 31, 1989
The M.W. Manufacturing site is a former copper
recovery facility located in Montour County,
Pennsylvania, two miles north of Danville. The
Pennsylvania Department of Transportation
(PennDOT) maintains a storage area immediately
north of the site, and farmlands and wooded lots
are adjacent to the site on the west and south.
Mauses Creek flows in a southerly direction past
the site. Several private residences, motels, gas
stations, restaurants, and a Head Start school are
located just north of the PennDOT storage area
and rely on private ground water wells for
drinking water. M.W. Manufacturing was engaged
in secondary copper recovery from scrap wire,
using both mechanical and chemical processes.
Granular carbon wastes generated by the chemical
process was dumped onsite, and spent solvents
and acids were allegedly disposed of onsite. In
1972, M.W. Manufacturing filed for bankruptcy
and the Philadelphia National Bank acquired the
property. Warehouse 81 Inc. acquired the site in
1976, and subsequently formed a limited
partnership with Domino Salvage, Inc. to recover
wire at the site using mechanical recovery only.
The initial remedial investigation revealed several
areas posing potential threats to public health:
the carbon waste pile, four wire-fluff waste piles,
a surface impoundment, buried lagoon and
contaminated soil, drums and storage tanks. This
remedial action addresses the concerns for direct
contact with and migration to ground water of
contaminants from the carbon waste pile. The
remaining areas are the subject of a long-term
RI/FS. The primary contaminants of concern
affecting the soil are VOCs including PCE and
TCE; organics including PCBs; and metals
including lead.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
excavating the carbon waste pile (approximately
875 cubic yards of contaminated waste and
contaminated underlying soil) and transporting
the waste offsite to an incinerator facility and
disposing of the ash in an offsite RCRA
hazardous waste landfill. The estimated capital
cost for this remedial action is $2,061,000. Since
onsite remediation activities are anticipated to
require less than one year, there are no O&M
costs.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Excavation of soil will be based on visible
contamination. The carcinogens will be treated
to less than 2 ug/kg for each individual
contaminant which corresponds to the risk range
of 1O4 to 10-*.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Carcinogenic Compounds; Debris;
Direct Contact; Excavation; Incineration; Lead;
Metals; Offeite Disposal; Offsite Treatment; PCBs;
PCE; Public Exposure; RCRA; Soil; Solvents;
TCE; Treatment Technology; VOCs.
NEW CASTLE SPILL, DE
First Remedial Action - Final
September 28, 1989
The New Castle Spill site is a former
manufacturing facility 0.5 mile north of New
Castle, Delaware, and is in the 100-year
floodplain of the Delaware River. Commercial
enterprises and residences neighbor the site and
receive potable water from the deeper of the two
aquifers underlying the site. The six-acre area
associated with the site consists of municipal
property, wetlands, and the Witco manufacturing
facility which produced plastic foams using tris
(2-chloropropyl)-phosphate (tris). In 1977,
because of dead grass near the facility's drum
storage area, Witco investigated the area and
determined that four to five drums of tris had
spilled and contaminated the soil and the shallow
aquifer. The State subsequently pumped and
discharged contaminated ground water into
adjacent wetlands. A 1988 remedial investigation
revealed that there is no longer a source of
contamination at the site and that tris has
contaminated the shallow aquifer but not the
deeper aquifer. This limited response action
addresses the ground water contamination in the
shallow aquifer. The primary contaminant of
concern affecting the ground water is tris
(2-chloropropyl)-phosphate.
72
-------
The selected remedial action for this site includes
natural attenuation as the treatment of the
principal threat to ground water; ground water,
surface water, and sediment monitoring; and
implementation of institutional controls. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $466,147, which includes O&M costs of
$25,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Because there are no ARARs for the chemical
of concern, tris (2-chloropropyl)-phosphate, EPA
has established a TBC criterion of 4.4 mg/1 which
is based on an average daily intake of 0.125
mg/kg/day. Achieving the TBC level through
natural attenuation is expected to take four years.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls will be implemented to restrict further
installation of wells in the shallow aquifer.
KEYWORDS: Direct Contact; Floodplain;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Institutional Controls; Organics; Surface Water
Monitoring; Wetlands.
ORDNANCE WORKS DISPOSAL AREAS, WV
First Remedial Action (Amendment)
September 29, 1989
The Ordnance Works Disposal Areas site is on
the west bank of the Monangahela River in
Morgantown, Monongolia County, West Virginia.
Several chemical facilities have operated at the
site since the early 1940s, producing substances
such as hexamine, ammonia, methyl alcohol,
formaldehyde, ethylene diamine and coke. This
operable unit addresses onsite contamination
found in the following areas: an inactive landfill
where solid and chemical wastes were disposed of;
a scraped area which consists of bare soil adjacent
to the landfill where solid wastes were buried; two
former lagoon areas which were closed following
a cleanup action in 1976; and several streams
located in the southern portion of the site. This
ROD supersedes a 1988 ROD which was
rescinded after public comments prompted further
investigation. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil and sediment are
organics including cPAHs and metals including
arsenic and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
excavation and onsite treatment of approximately
425 cubic yards of inorganic contaminated soil
from hot spots in the scraped area and lagoon
area using solidification, followed by placement of
the treated soil in the landfill before capping;
installing a multimedia RCRA Subtitle C cap on
the landfill and regrading and revegetation;
excavating approximately 13,460 cubic yards of
organic-contaminated soil and sediment from the
lagoon area, scraped area, and streams, with
onsite treatment by bioremediation in a treatment
bed; ground water, surface water, and sediment
monitoring; and implementing deed restrictions to
prohibit residential and industrial construction at
the site. A contingency remedy has been selected
which would include soil washing of contaminated
soil as the principal treatment. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action is
$8,332,000, which includes annual O&M costs.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Cleanup goals for carcinogens (e.g., cPAHs and
arsenic) are based on a 10"* excess cancer risk
level. Chemical-specific soil and sediment goals
include cPAHs 44.7 mg/kg, arsenic 88.8 mg/kg,
and lead 500 mg/kg.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:
Deed
restrictions will be imposed to prohibit residential
and industrial construction in the landfill area and
residential construction in the remaining areas of
the site.
KEYWORDS: Arsenic; Biodegradation/Land
Application; Capping; Carcinogenic Compounds;
Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act; Closure
Requirements; Direct Contact; Excavation;
Ground Water Monitoring; Institutional Controls;
Landfill Closure; Lead; Metals; O&M; Onsite
Disposal; Onsite Treatment; Organics; PAHs;
RCRA; Sediment; Soil; Solidification/
Stabilization; Surface Water Monitoring;
Treatability Studies; Treatment Technology.
73
-------
PTJBUOKER/OJYAHOGA WRECKING, PA
First Remedial Action
June 30, 1989
The Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking site is a
37-acre, abandoned manufacturing plant in
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. A chemical company
lies to the north, a marine terminal to the south,
and the Delaware River to the east. Although
the immediate area surrounding the site is
primarily industrial, approximately 400,000 people
live within one mile of the site. From 1912 to
1985, Publicker Industries owned and operated a
liquor and industrial alcohol manufacturing plant
at the site. The plant included 440 large tanks,
storage drums, product stock, chemical
laboratories, reaction vessels, production buildings,
warehouses, a power plant, and several hundred
miles of above- and below-ground process lines.
Petroleum was also stored onsite during the late
1970s and the early 1980s. Publicker Industries
discontinued operations and sold the property in
1986. EPA evaluated site conditions in 1987
following two explosions and a large fire.
Tankers, pits/sumps, and numerous process lines
were found to contain fuel oils or other
contaminated oils. EPA initiated an emergency
removal action in December 1987 to stabilize the
site and control the threat of additional fires and
explosions. Emergency removal activities included
onsite bulking and storing of solid and liquid
waste streams; disposing of highly reactive
laboratory wastes and cylinders offeite; crushing
approximately 3,100 emptied drums; wrapping
overhead pipelines insulated with asbestos; and
implementing a 24-hour fire and security watch.
According to EPA estimates, over one million
gallons of bulked waste materials remain onsite
stored in dilapidated tanks and drums. Twelve
waste streams have been identified, including base
neutral liquids and solids, organic liquids and
solids, oxidizing liquids and solids, water reactives,
chlorides, crushed empty metal drums, and
contaminated oils. This remedial action is
designed to stabilize the site and enable continued
site cleanup of soil, ground water, and asbestos.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the soil and ground water are VOCs, and other
organics including PCBs and pesticides.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
offeite treatment and disposal of the various waste
streams in RCRA-permitted facilities; demolition
of above-ground process lines, with proper
packaging of contaminated insulation and onsite
storage pending disposition in a subsequent
remedial action; and offeite disposal of hazardous
chemicals recovered from within the lines. The
estimated capital cost for this remedial action is
$13,900,000; there are no O&M costs.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
This initial remedy action will stabilize the site
and remove the threat of fire or explosion by
removing, treating, and disposing of waste streams
offeite.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Asbestos; Debris;
Decontamination; Direct Contact; Offsite
Disposal; Ground Water; Offeite Treatment; Oils;
Organics; PCBs; Pesticides; RCRA; Soil;
Solidification/Stabilization; Temporary Storage;
VOCs.
REESER'S LANDFILL, PA
First Remedial Action - Final
March 30, 1989
The Reeser's Landfill site is an inactive unlined
municipal refuse dump located approximately five
miles west of Allentown, Pennsylvania. The site
is situated in a valley used predominantly for
farming; however, there are residences to the west
and northeast. Principal drainage in the area is
via Iron Run, and the landfill drains via a series
of seeps along the landfill perimeter and a
network of surface channels. The 15-acre landfill
is located on the southern portion of a 51.5-acre
private parcel of land, and historically operated as
an open pit iron mine. After mining operations
ceased, local residents used the site as a dump,
and in the late 1960s the property was leased to
Reeser's Hauling Service. The landfill, which was
never issued a solid waste permit, reportedly
received a variety of wastes including domestic,
commercial, industrial, and demolition wastes, and
possibly battery wastes and drums. In 1981, after
a fire burned in the northern corner of the
landfill for several months, the State ordered Mr.
74
-------
Reeser to properly close the landfill to comply
with State municipal waste disposal regulations.
This has yet to be carried out. EPA
investigations have determined that there is no
direct contact threat from the site soil or from
ground water. Additionally, Reeser's Landfill has
not adversely impacted the receptor stream, Iron
Run, as evidenced by the presence of similar
contaminant levels upstream and downstream
from the site. The water quality of offsite and
onsite ponds was also similar. Therefore, it was
determined that no remedial action was necessary.
There are no primary contaminants of concern
affecting this site.
The remedial action for this site is a no action
remedy with ground water review within five
years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Not applicable.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Ground Water Monitoring; No
Action Remedy.
STRASBURG LANDFILL, PA
First Remedial Action
June 29, 1989
The Strasburg Landfill site is a 222-acre facility
in western Newlin Township, Chester County,
Pennsylvania. The surrounding area includes
farmland and 200 homes in close proximity to the
site. Two creeks, Brandywine and Briar Run,
flow in close proximity to the site's western,
southern, and eastern borders and receive surface
drainage. A major aquifer underlying the landfill
provides drinking water via private and public
wells to all local residences. These private wells
are as close as 720 feet to the landfill In the
spring of 1979 site owners began accepting
industrial wastes and heavy metals which, by
year's end, included more than 1,000 cubic yards
of polyvinyl chloride wastes, 2,052 cubic yards of
industrial wastes and sludge, and 35,000 gallons of
heavy metal sludge. In December 1979 the State
claimed that industrial wastes from the landfill
caused excessive siltation of Briar Run Creek, and
eight months later the State prohibited the site
owners from receiving any additional industrial
wastes. In 1980 sampling revealed VOC
contamination in the ground water and by April
1983 leachate seeped at a rate of several gallons
per minute from the southeastern portion of the
landfill. After charging the site owners with
operating violations and subsequently suspending
their operating permit, the State ordered the
landfill to be closed. As part of the closure plan,
leachate was collected and stored in 5,000 gallon
tanks, and the landfill was regraded and covered.
The leachate is currently transported daily to an
offsite treatment facility. Additionally, surface
water runoff was directed toward a sediment pond
which discharged directly into Briar Run Creek.
Proposed corrective measures, however, were
never completely implemented. Several seepage
areas have since been observed near the landfill.
One large seepage area is near the southeastern
corner of the landfill. Liquid from the seep
ultimately flows into a sediment pond near the
eastern edge of the landfill which drains via a
drainage pipe into Briar Run Creek. During
heavy rainfalls, the sediment pond overflows into
Briar Run Creek. The State has performed
analyses of seep water from Briar Run Creek and
of leachate from a manhole near the sediment
pond and has monitored ground water for VOCs.
Two residential drinking water wells contain
multiple organic compounds. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the sediment
pond and ground water are VOCs including TCE,
PCE, toluene, and xylenes.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
leachate collection, using an interceptor drain and
offsite treatment; and provision of an alternate
water supply to affected residences by installing
point-of-use activated carbon treatment systems at
residences with contaminated ground water above
levels of concern. The estimated capital cost for
the remedial action is $42,850, with estimated
annual O&M costs of $4,500. Costs are based on
an estimate of three residences requiring an
alternate water supply.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Treated ground water concentrations for
carcinogenic contaminants will be such that the
aggregate carcinogenic risk would be less than
10"*. Target concentrations for noncarcinogenic
contaminants will ensure a hazard index less than
75
-------
1. Because of an ARAR waiver for the leachate,
no chemical-specific cleanup goals were specified
for the leachate seep.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Alternate Water Supply; ARAR
Waiver; Carcinogenic Compounds; Direct Contact;
Ground Water; Ground Water Treatment; Interim
Remedy; Leachate Collection; MCLs; O&M;
Offsite Disposal; Oflsite Treatment; PCE; TCE;
Temporary Storage; Toluene; VOCs; Xylenes.
WHTIMOYER LABORATORIES, PA
First Remedial Action
June 30, 1989
The 22-acre Whitmoyer Laboratories site is
located in Jackson Township, Lebanon County,
Pennsylvania. Land use surrounding the site is
predominantly agricultural; however, there is some
residential, commercial, and industrial
development within 1.5 miles of-the site. This
includes a manufacturing plant to the south; a
pharmaceutical factory to the east; a large, active
limestone quarry to the west; and an elementary
school to the northwest of the site. Portions of
the site are within neighboring Tulpehocken
Creek's 100-year floodplain. The creek, which is
bordered by small, open wetlands areas, is being
proposed for inclusion in Pennsylvania's scenic
river system, with a "priority 1A status." Priority
1A status would designate the stream as being in
most urgent need of protection. In 1957 site
owners began producing organic arsenicals at the
site. In 1964 widespread ground water
contamination was discovered onsite leading to
the placement of concentrated wastes in a
concrete vault and the initiation of ground water
pumping and treatment. Sludge from the ground
water treatment was later consolidated in lagoons.
In 1987 an EPA investigation revealed that
approximately 69,000 gallons of concentrated
liquids had been abandoned onsite in 18 tanks
and 14 piping units. The wastes include 5,000
gallons of water-immiscible liquids, 25,000 gallons
of water-miscible liquids with a high arsenic
content, and 39,000 gallons of water-miscible
liquids with a low arsenic content. All the tanks
and piping units are within 400 feet of
Tulpehocken Creek; 27 of the 32 tanks and
piping are within 150 feet. Because the site
slopes toward the creek, any release from a tank
or piping failure is likely to contaminate the
creek. Flooding of the creek could cause failure
of these tanks, resulting in catastrophic release of
contaminants to the creek. Additionally,
contaminants released from the tanks and piping
units could migrate to ground water and or the
drinking water supply lines serving the site.
Because the concentrated liquids pose significant
health and environmental threats, their removal is
addressed in this first operable unit. Subsequent
operable units will identify potential soil, ground
water, and" surface water/sediment contamination
and additional remedial actions that may be
necessary. The primary contaminants of concern
in the concentrated liquids are VOCs including
PCE, and metals including arsenic.
The selected interim remedial action for this site
includes consolidating, transporting offsite, and
then treating, using thermal treatment or
biodegradation, or recycling approximately 69,000
gallons of concentrated liquid wastes at a
permitted RCRA facility, followed by disposing
of treated water in offsite surface water and
disposing of solid residues in an offsite landfill;
decontaminating 32 tanks, approximately 2,000
feet of piping to meet RCRA Subtitle C closure
standards, and tanks and piping left onsite for
reuse, scrap, and disposal; and treating and
disposing of the cleaning agent residues offsite at
RCRA-permitted facilities. The estimated capital
cost of this interim remedial action is $475,000,
with no O&M costs.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
This interim remedial action will comply with
ARARs.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Arsenic; Biodegradation/Land
Application; Carcinogenic Compounds; Closure
Requirements; Debris; Decontamination; Direct
Contact; Floodplain; Incineration/Thermal
Destruction; Interim Remedy; Metals; Offsite
Disposal; Offsite Treatment; PCE; RCRA;
Treatment Technology; VOCs; Wetlands.
76
-------
WILDCAT LANDFILL, DE
Second Remedial Action - Final
November 28, 1988
The Wildcat Landfill site is 2.5 miles southeast of
Dover, in Kent County, Delaware. A 2.7-acre
pond, formed by the landfill blocking natural
drainage from upland areas, is located along the
northwestern border of the site. The pond and
the landfill are located along the west bank of the
St. Jones River and are bordered to the north
and east by the river and associated marshlands,
and to the south and west by residential and
commercial development. Portions of the site lie
within the 100-year floodplain of the St. Jones
River. The landfill was addressed in the first
operable unit ROD signed in June 1988. This
operable unit details the selection of a remedial
alternative which addresses the largely
environmental concerns the landfill poses to the
pond and associated biota. The landfill was
operated as a State-permitted sanitary landfill
between 1962 and 1973, accepting both municipal
and industrial wastes. Industrial wastes suspected
to have been disposed of onsite include latex
waste and paint sludges. During its 11 years of
operation, the facility routinely violated operating
and other permits issued by the regulatory
agencies. In August 1973 the facility was ordered
closed by the State and the site owners were
required to cover the site with soil and
vegetation. EPA began investigating the site in
1982. Surface water and sediment in the pond
were contaminated by inorganic constituents
leaching from the landfill. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the sediment
and surface water in the pond are metals
including arsenic, chromium; and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
draining, filling, and revegetating the pond area
consistent with the landfill cover selected in the
previous ROD; constructing a new pond
elsewhere on the site; implementing institutional
controls for land use restrictions; and ground
water monitoring upgradient of the new pond.
Pond water will be discharged to St. Jones River,
to the north of the site.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Prior to draining, the pond water will be analyzed
to ensure that Federal Water Quality Criteria are
met at the ground water discharge location.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Land use
restrictions will be implemented to prevent
development on the area of the filled pond.
Restrictions will also be made to ensure that the
integrity of the new pond is maintained.
KEYWORDS: Arsenic; Chromium; Filling;
Floodplain; Ground Water Monitoring;
Institutional Controls; Lead; Metals; Onsite
Discharge; Sediment; Surface Water; Water
Quality Criteria; Wetlands.
77
-------
RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
REGION IV
(Alabama, Rorida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina,
South Carolina, Tennessee)
ABERDEEN PESTICIDE
DUMPS (FAIRWAY SEX), NC
First Remedial Action
June 30, 1989
The Aberdeen Pesticide Dumps (Fairway Six) site
is a former disposal area in Moore County, North
Carolina, approximately 1.6 miles west-northwest
of Aberdeen. The site is in a rural area, on the
property of Partners in the Pits, LTD and Yadco
of Pinehurst Inc., and bounded on the south by a
railroad, on the north by the sixth fairway of the
Pit golf course, and on the east and west by
undeveloped property. Although the rural area is
sparsely populated, residential growth is expected
in the near future. In August 1984 the State was
alerted that pesticides had been disposed of at
and around the site for a number of years. A
State inspection revealed that soil and debris were
contaminated with pesticides. In June 1985 EPA
initiated an emergency response action to excavate
and remove onsite contaminated surface soil and
two buried trenches. The soil and debris were
disposed of offsite. In 1986 pesticides were
detected in drinking water from four municipal
wells and three private wells in Aberdeen causing
EPA to reinvestigate the site. A subsequent
investigation identified additional trenches
containing approximately 12 million pounds of
pesticide wastes. A test burn, conducted in
December 1986, incinerated 12,000 pounds of
pesticide-contaminated soil and debris using a
mobile incinerator. Residual ash was stored
onsite in twenty-seven 55-gallon drums.
Additional removal funding was provided to
excavate, shred, screen, and stockpile
approximately 22,000 cubic yards of pesticide-
contaminated materials. The predominant
contaminants of concern affecting the soil and
debris are chlorinated organo-pesticides.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
excavating and homogenizing stockpiled
pesticide-contaminated wastes; treating
homogenized wastes in an onsite, mobile thermal
treatment facility and reinjeeting process
wastewater or scrubber blowdown into the
thermal treatment facility; analyzing ash to
demonstrate ash is nonhazardous; monitoring air
emissions; and redisposing residual ash onsite.
The estimated present worth cost for this
remedial action is $14,533,000. There are no
annual O&M costs associated with this remedial
action.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The selected remedy will attain Federal and State
ARARs; however, no chemical-specific goals were
provided. Cleanup criteria established for the
stockpile are to background levels and to the
RCRA EP toxicity levels. The air pollution
control system will achieve performance standards,
which are defined as hydrogen chloride less than
4 pds/hr and paniculate matter of less than 0.08
grains/dry ft3 in the exhaust gas connected to 7
percent oxygen content.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air; Air Monitoring; Background
Levels; Carcinogenic Compounds; Debris; Direct
Contact; Excavation; Incineration/Thermal
Destruction; MCLs; MCLGs; Onsite Disposal;
Onsite Treatment; Organics; Pesticides; RCRA;
Soil; Treatability Studies; Treatment Technology.
AMERICAN CREOSOTE WORKS
(JACKSON PLANT), TN
First Remedial Action
January 5, 1989
The American Creosote Works (ACW) site is
located immediately southwest of Jackson, in
central Madison County, Tennessee. The 60-acre
site is in a partially developed area, and is
bounded on the southwest by the South Fork of
the Forked Deer River, on the west and north by
Central Creek (a tributary to the South Fork of
the Forked Deer River), on the east by a lumber
mill, and on the south by the Seaboard Railroad.
ACW conducted wood preserving operations using
78
-------
both creosote and POP from the early 1930s until
December 1981. Wastewater sludge from the
treatment processes are listed as RCRA KOO1
waste. Untreated process wastewater and
potentially contaminated stormwater runoff were
discharged directly into Central Creek until 1973,
at which time a levee was constructed to retain
surface water runoff. The soil borrow pits used
for the levee construction became sludge storage
lagoons. A wastewater treatment system was
installed onsite during 1974 and 1975, and
operated until 1981. Reportedly, a "few" loads of
filter sludge from the treatment system were
spread on the back road on the east end of the
property, and a recirculation pond overflowed
more than once. In March 1983 five unlined
lagoons containing creosote and PCP sludge and
water overflowed, prompting the first of two EPA
removal actions. In May 1983 the first removal
consisted of pumping and treating approximately
30 million gallons of water, placing the remaining
untreated oil/water mixture in empty tanks onsite,
stabilizing the contaminated soil and sludge
remaining in the lagoon material, and covering
two lagoons with a clay cap. A second removal
action was conducted in March 1986 after several
storage tanks were determined to be leaking. The
plant process facilities, including the treatment
building, storage tanks, piping, ponds, and filters,
are considered a point source of contaminants
due to leakage from these structures and adjacent
pits. Furthermore, several tanks and pipes are
structurally unsound and open to precipitation,
posing a threat of overflow or sudden, major
release of contaminants. This remedial action
will focus on reducing surface contamination
resulting from degradation of the tanks and site
structures, and minimize the potential for
increased contamination due to flooding while
further information is developed and analyzed.
A subsequent remedial action will address
contaminated soil, ground water, and surface
streams. The primary contaminants of concern
affecting the sludge, site structures, debris, and
tanked liquids are VOCs and other organics
including PAHs and phenols.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
consolidation and incineration of sludge in the
vicinity of the buildings and tanks; on- or offsite
incineration of the oils and sludge from the tanks;
treatment of tanked process liquids onsite using
a sand filter, filter press, and carbon adsorption
unit, followed by discharge to a surface stream;
decontamination and offsite disposal of site
structures (e.g., buildings, tanks, pipes) in a
RCRA Subtitle D facility; construction of a
flood-protection dike; deed restrictions and site
fencing; and site stabilization including monitoring
onsite water levels behind the dikes and pumping,
treating (as needed), and discharging impounded
water pending a final remedy. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action ranges
from $5,000,000 to $6,000,000. Annual O&M
costs were not provided.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Remedy reduces potential for direct exposure to
sludge and process liquids while further
investigations are conducted. Quantitative goals
were not provided for final site remediation.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed
restrictions will be implemented to restrict further
use of the site.
KEYWORDS: Carbon Adsorption; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Water Act; Debris;
Decontamination; Direct Contact; Floodplain;
Incineration/Thermal Destruction; Institutional
Controls; Levees; O&M; Offsite Disposal; Offsite
Treatment; Oils; Onsite Discharge; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; PAHs; Phenols; RCRA;
Sludge; State Standards/Regulations; Treatability
Studies; Treatment Technology; VOCs.
AMERICAN CREOSOTE WORKS
(PENSACOLA PLANT), FL
Second Remedial Action
September 28, 1989
The 18-acre American Creosote Works (Pensacola
Plant) site, is in a dense, moderately commercial
and residential area of Pensacola, Florida,
approximately 600 yards from Pensacola Bay and
Bayou Chico. American Creosote Works Inc.
operated a wood preserving facility onsite from
1902 to 1981. During this time, process
wastewater containing pentachlorophenol (PCP)
was discharged into two 0.9-and 1.8-acre unlined,
onsite surface impoundments. Prior to 1970,
wastewater in these ponds was allowed to
overflow through a spillway into the neighboring
79
-------
Bayou Chico and Pensacola Bay. After 1970,
wastewater was periodically drawn from the ponds
and discharged to designated onsite spillage areas.
Additional discharges occurred during periods of
heavy rainfall when the ponds overflowed. In
March 1980, the city found considerable quantities
of oily, asphaltic, creosotic material in the ground
water near the site. Because of the threat posed
to human health and the environment due to
frequent overflows from the waste ponds, EPA
and the State performed an emergency cleanup in
1983, which included dewatering the two ponds,
treating the water via coagulation and filtration,
and discharging treated water to the city sewer
system. The sludge in the ponds was then
solidified and capped. EPA signed a ROD in
1985 requiring all onsite and oflsite contaminated
solids, sludge, and sediment to be placed in an
onsite RCRA-permitted landfill. Because the
State did not concur with the selected remedy, no
remedial action was taken. Consequently, a post
remedial investigation was conducted in 1988 to
characterize the extent of contamination followed
by a post feasibility study in 1989 to identify,
develop, and evaluate alternatives. This ROD is
the first of two planned operable units and
addresses remediation of contaminated surface
soil. A second operable unit will address
treatment of contaminated subsurface soil, sludge,
and ground water. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the surface soil are organics
including dioxins, cPAHs, and PCP.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
excavating and treating 23,000 cubic yards of
PAH-contaminated soil using solid-phase
bioremediation in an onsite land treatment area
followed by onsite disposal of treated soil in the
excavated areas or spreading the soil over the
entire site; implementing temporary erosion
control measures to preserve surface water
quality, collecting leachate and drain water for
spraying over the treatment area to moisten soil;
monitoring dissolved oxygen, pH, nutrients, and
soil moisture content; removing debris, repairing
fences, sampling the cap and disposing of drums
containing drilling mud; and implementing land
and ground water use restrictions. The estimated
present worth cost is $2,275,000 which includes an
O&M cost of $319,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil cleanup levels are based on cancer potency
factors (GPF) and 10"5 excess cancer-risk levels.
Soil cleanup goals include cPAHs 50 mg/kg,
dioxins 2.5 ug/kg (based on 2,3,7,8-TCDD toxicity
equivalency), and PCP 30 mg/kg.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Ground water
and land use restrictions will be implemented.
KEYWORDS: Biodegradation/Land Application;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Dioxin; Direct Contact;
Excavation; Floodplain; Institutional Controls;
Leachate Collection; O&M; Onsite Disposal;
Onsite Treatment; Organics; PAHs; RCRA; Soil;
Treatability Studies; Treatment Technology.
AMNICOLA DUMP, TN
First Remedial Action - Final
March 30, 1989
The Aminicola Dump site is an 18-acre inactive
construction debris disposal site located in
Chattanooga, Tennessee. The site is located
along the east bank of the Tennessee River,
approximately 0.5 mile upstream of the intake for
the primary drinking water source sor the city of
Chattanooga. The site is bordered on thenorth
by dense vegetation and vegtation-covered debris,
and on the south by an industrial research facility.
The site drains westerly towards the river. During
the 1930s the Amnicola Dump site was reportedly
used for clay mining operations, resulting in
several water-filled pits. During the period from
1957 to 1964 construction debris and other
unidentified wastes were occasionally disposed of
in many of the open pits. The site was then
operated as a dump by the city of Chattanooga
until 1973, predominantly receiving constuction
debris including a substantial amount of waste
wood which was subsequently incinerated onsite.
The ashes eventually filed 12 acres of the 18-acre
site. The only industrial wast reportedly disposed
of at the site was latex waste. Unauthorized
waste dumping and concerns about leachage
discharge in prosimity to the drinking water
intake ara led to closure of the site in 1973.
Closure included covering, grading slopes, filling
depressions, draining standing water, applying rip-
rap along the western perimeter, constructing
drainage ditches, and seeding the entire surface
80
-------
area of the fill. The current owner and operater
has been burning, storing, and handling creosoted
railroad ties, contributing to elevated PHAs in
surface soil. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil, debris, and ground
water are organics including PAHs, and metals
including chromium.
The selected remedial actionfor this site includes
excavating and screening 600 cubic yards of
contaminated soil/debris with onsite
solidification/fixiation of 400 cubic yards of
contaminated soil and 200 cubic yards of debris
(debris exceeding cleanup goals or LDR
requirements will be disposed of offsite), followed
by onsite disposal of solidified mass; ground water
monitoring for 4 years; conducting a public health
assessment 5 years after completion of the
remedial action; and implementation of
institutional controls including ground water and
land use restrictions. The estimated present
worth cost for this remedial action is $640,000
with O&M costs of $384,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil will be treated to the health-based cleanup
goal of total cPAHs 100 mg/kg. Ground water
will be brought to ACLs through ground water
use restrictions. Individual ACLs were provided
for nine contaminants, including chloroform 86
ug/1 and chromium 890 ug/1.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Land use
restrictions will be imposed on the site to prevent
the accumulation of contamination exceeding the
surface soil cleanup goals as a result of handling,
storage or burning creosoted railroad ties.
Ground water use restrictions will be imposed
within a reasonable distance from the site in
keeping with the establishment of ACLs.
KEYWORDS: Carcinogenic Compounds;
Chromium; Debris; Direct Contact; Excavation;
Floodplain; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Institutional Controls; Metals; O&M;
Offsite Disposal; Onsite Disposal; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; PAHs; RCRA; Soil;
Solidification/Stabilization; TreatmentTechnology.
CAPE FEAR WOOD PRESERVING, NC
First Remedial Action - Final
June 30, 1989
The 9-acre Cape Fear Wood Preserving site is in
Cumberland County, North Carolina on a 41-acre
tract of land. The predominantly flat site is
comprised of the wood treatment facility,
wetlands, and undisturbed forests. A variety of
land uses exist in the area including industrial,
agricultural and residential. The Cape Fear
Wood Preserving facility operated from 1953 to
1983 first using a wood-treating process that
included creosote and later switching to a
technique known as the copper-chromium- arsenic
(CCA) process. Liquid and sludge wastes
generated by both of these processes were
pumped into a drainage ditch and an unlined
lagoon. In 1977, as a result of a State site
investigation that revealed coal tar creosote
contamination, the property owner was ordered
to remove 900 cubic yards of creosote
contaminated soil. In 1984 EPA conducted a site
investigation which resulted in an emergency
removal action. This action included excavating
contaminated soil and sludge followed by offsite
disposal and pumping lagoon water into onsite
storage tanks. In 1986, 500 gallons of creosote
spilled from a storage tank causing EPA to
conduct a second emergency response.
Emergency response activities included removal
and solidification of 10 cubic yards of sludge and
pumping of 15,000 gallons of CCA waste water
into onsite storage tanks. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil,
sediment, ground water, and surface water are
VOCs including benzene; other organics including
PAHs; and metals including arsenic and
chromium.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
offsite disposal of CCA salt crystals found in the
drainage system and solidified creosote at a
RCRA landfill and offsite disposal of
asbestos-containing pipe insulation in the county
solid waste facility; removal and decontamination
of onsite pipes and tanks to be sold for scrap
metal or disposed of in the county solid waste
facility; excavation and onsite treatment of soil
and sediment using soil flushing as the preferred
alternative or a low thermal desorption process to
remove organics followed by soil washing or
81
-------
fixation/stabilization/solidification to address
inorganics (a soil washing treatability study will
determine if the preferred alternative would be
appropriate) followed by placement of treated soil
and sediment in the excavated area and
revegetation; pumping with onsite treatment of
ground water and surface water with oflsite
discharge at a POTW or a surface stream; sale
of 50,000 gallons of CCA solution to a buyer, if
no buyer is found, CCA solution and CCA-
contaminated wastewater will be treated using the
ground water treatment system; and ground water
monitoring. The estimated present worth cost for
this remedial action ranges from $14,370,000 to
514,910,000 including present worth O&M costs
which range from $1,020,000 to $1,310,000 for 30
years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The ground water cleanup criteria established for
this site include benzene 5 ug/1 (MCL), cPAHs 10
ug/1 (CLRQL), and noncarcinogenic PAHs 14,350
ug/1. For surface water the criteria include
arsenic 12 ug/1 (AWQC), chromium 11 ug/1
(AWQC), and copper 14 ug/1 (background). The
soil criteria include arsenic 94 mg/kg, benzene
0.005 mg/kg (CLQRL), chromium 88 mg/kg
(background), cPAHs 2.5 mg/kg, and total PAHs
100 mg/kg (background); and the sediment criteria
include total PAHs 3 mg/kg, arsenic 94 mg/kg,
and chromium 88 mg/kg.
INSTTrunONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS; Arsenic; Asbestos; Benzene;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Chromium; Clean
Water Act; Closure Requirements; Debris;
Decontamination; Direct Contact; Dredging;
Drinking Water Contaminants; Excavation;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; MCLs; Metals; O&M;
Offsite Discharge; Offeite Disposal; Onsite
Treatment; PAHs; Plume Management; Public
Exposure; Publicly Owned Treatment Works
(POTW); RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act;
Sediment; Soil; Soil Washing/Flushing; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water; Surface
Water Treatment; Treatability Studies; Treatment
Technology; VOCs; Water Quality Criteria;
Wetlands.
CAROIAWN, SC
First Remedial Action
September 27, 1989
The Carolawn site is an approximately 60-acre,
abandoned waste storage and disposal facility in
Fort Lawn, Chester County, South Carolina.
Rural and agricultural areas surround most of the
site. Four residences lie within 300 yards of the
site, and approximately 30 single family residences
lie within a 2-mile radius of the site. The site is
bordered to the east by Fishing Creek, which
empties into the Catawba River eight miles south
of the site. Approximately 2,500 people receive
their water supply from the Catawba River.
Storage trailers and tanks and as many as 480
drums of solvents and liquid and solid wastes
have been stored inside a 3-acre fenced portion of
the property since 1970. An additional 660
drums and 11 storage tanks were located outside
the fenced area to the north. Drums, waste, and
contaminated soil were removed from the site by
EPA in 1981, and all nearby residences were
provided an alternative water source. An
additional 17 storage tanks were removed in 1986
by the PRPs. Contaminants have been detected
in ground water flowing underneath the site
which discharges into Fishing Creek. This ROD
addresses remediation of contaminated ground
water. A subsequent ROD will address
remediation of the contaminated soil, if necessary.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the ground water are VOCs including TCE and
metals including lead.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
ground water pumping and treatment using one
or more of the following methods: air stripping,
biodegradation, activated carbon filtration, and
metals removal and will be determined during the
remedial design stage based on the level of
contaminants found and the treated ground water
discharge point selected; implementing deed
restrictions; plugging condemned wells; disposing
the two inactive incinerators and two remaining
drums; and monitoring ground water and soil.
The estimated present worth cost for this
remedial action ranges from $1,141,071 to
$1,356,305, with a present worth O&M cost for
over 30 years ranging from $753,433 to $916,723,
depending on the extent of treatment and
ultimate discharge point for the treated water.
82
-------
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water will meet SDWA MCLs. Target
cleanup levels included TCE 5 ug/1 and lead 5
ug/1.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS:
restrictions will be implemented.
Deed
KEYWORDS: Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean
Water Act; Direct Contact; Drinking Water
Contaminants; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Institutional Controls; Lead; MCLs; Metals;
Offsite Discharge; O&M; Organics; Safe Drinking
Water Act; TCE; VOCs; Water Quality Criteria.
CELANESE (SHELBY FIBER
OPERATIONS), NC
Second Remedial Action - Final
March 28, 1989
The 450-acre Celanese Fiber Operations (CFO)
site is a polyester raw-material production facility
located in Cleveland County, North Carolina.
The plant's facilities include a plant production
area, wastewater treatment area, former waste
disposal areas, and a land farm area. The
adjacent land is rural, and some residences are
located within 1 mile of the site. The plant
began operations in 1960 as Fiber Industries, Inc.
and manufactured polyester polymer chip and
filament yarn using the chemicals dimethyl
terephthalate and ethylene glycol. The plant's
waste treatment facility was constructed in phases
concurrent with the manufacturing plant; thus, in
the years prior to the completion of the treatment
facility, chemical wastes were dumped directly into
a drainage ditch. Treated effluent has been
discharged to Buffalo Creek since the mid-1960s
when Fiber Industries, Inc. completed
construction of the treatment facility. Celanese
Corporation bought the site and facilities in 1983.
In addition to the discharge from the wastewater
treatment plant, CFO also discharges alum-treated
bandcaster water directly to Buffalo Creek.
Several areas around the plant have been used for
waste disposal, including old burning pits for
normal plant wastes (polyester and trash), a glycol
recovery unit (GRU) sludge burial area, two
soak-away ponds used to contain treated sanitary
sewage from 1960 to 1969, and a former drum
storage and staging area. Four additional buried
waste areas are located to the north and outside
of the main plant perimeter fence: a polymer
and fiber landfill, a construction debris landfill, a
21-acre sludge disposal area, and a drum storage
area which temporarily stored 2,000 to 3,000
drums of waste chemicals and solvents from 1970
to 1978. The drums were removed by 1978. A
1988 ROD addressed extraction and treatment of
contaminated ground water. This second operable
unit addresses source control including
contaminated sludge and soil associated with the
GRU trenches and burn pit areas. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil and
sediment are VOCs including benzene and TCE;
other organics including phenols and PAHs; and
metals including lead and chromium.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
excavation of 3,710 cubic yards of GRU sludges,
plastic chips, burn pit residuals, and sediment
with onsite incineration of contaminated soil and
GRU sludge and chemical fixation (solidification)
of incinerator ash, plastic chips, burn pit residuals
and sediment, followed by disposal of the inert,
solidified material in the excavated area; regrading
and filling of excavated area; and ground water
monitoring. The estimated present worth cost for
this remedial action is $3,500,000; O&M costs
were not provided.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The selected remedy will attain a 10"* cancer-risk
level as it removes the source of the ground water
contamination. No chemical-specific standards or
goals were provided.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Benzene; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Clean Air Act; Direct
Contact; Excavation; Filling; Incineration/
Thermal Destruction; Lead; Metals; Onsite
Disposal; Onsite Treatment; Organics; PAHs;
Phenols; Public Exposure; RCRA; Sediment; Soil;
Solidification/Stabilization; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Treatment
Technology; VOCs.
83
-------
CHEMTRONICS, NC
First Remedial Action (Amendment) - Final
April 26, 1989
This ROD amends the April 5,1988, Chemtronics
ROD which included an incorrect calculation
regarding the chemical quality of the ground
water. The Chemtronics site is an active waste
disposal facility located in a rural area of
Swannanoa, Buncombe County, North Carolina.
The 1,027-acre site was developed as an industrial
facility in 1952 and was purchased by
Chemtronics, Inc. in 1978. Approximately 10
acres of the site were used for waste disposal
operations. Records indicate the presence of 23
individual onsite disposal areas (DAs) which are
grouped into six discrete areas: DA-6, DA-7/8,
DA-9, DA-10/11, DA-23, and the acid pit. From
1952 to 1971 solid waste materials and possibly
solvents were incinerated in pits and chemical
wastes, including waste materials generated in the
production of the chemical warfare agent
3-quinuclidinyl benzilate (BZ) and the tear gas
agent o-chlorobenzylidene malononitrile (CS),
were placed in 55-gallon drums with a
neutralizing solution, and then buried onsite in
trench-type landfills. From 1971 to 1975 small
volumes of liquid wastes were disposed of in
onsite pits and trenches, and solid wastes, rocket
motors, explosive wastes, and other waste types
were burned. From 1975 to 1979 Chemtronics,
Inc. constructed pits and trenches as needed, for
the disposal of spent acid and various organic
wastes. In 1980 the State ordered Chemtronics to
discontinue all discharges to site pits and
trenches. The pits were subsequently backfilled.
Starting in 1979, Chemtronics installed a
500,000-gallon lined lagoon over an old leaching
field for the biotreatment of wastewater. The
incompatibility of the liner with the brominated
wastes introduced into the lagoon caused the
lagoon to release its contents. The lagoon was
reconstructed in August 1980, using a different
liner, and deactivated in 1984. In September
1984, the U.S. Army Toxic Hazardous Materials
Agency sampled two drums in DA-10/11. These
drums were suspected of containing wastes from
the production of BZ. Although no BZ was
found, EPA initiated an immediate removal of
these drums in January 1985 due to heightened
public awareness of the site. In the original
ROD the selected remedial action for the
contaminants and contaminated soil in DA-23 was
soil fixation/stabilization/solidification, followed by
capping. This remedy has been changed to
capping only. The original remedy was selected
due to the concentration level of the contaminant
benzylic acid a benzophenone found in the
ground water downgradient of DA-23. However,
a transcription error was discovered in the
analytical results for this ground water sample.
The laboratory reported the concentrations as 470
mg/1 instead of 470 ug/1. Subsequent sampling
verified that the correct concentration was in the
0-470 ug/1 range. Therefore, EPA elected to
change the source control remedial action for
DA-23 to capping only. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil,
sediment, ground water and surface water are
VOCs including benzene, toluene, PCE, and TCE;
other organics including pesticides and explosives;
and metals including arsenic, lead, and chromium.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
multi-layer capping of DA-6, DA-7/8, DA-9,
DA-10/11, DA-23 and the acid pit area; ground
water pumping and treatment using air stripping,
carbon adsorption, or metal removal with
treatment and discharge to be determined during
design; sampling of pond water and sediment and,
if necessary, surface water treatment using the
ground water treatment system and onsite
disposal of sediment; implementation of
institutional controls and access restrictions; and
sediment, ground water, and surface water
monitoring. The estimated present worth cost for
this remedial action is $2,248,900 with an annual
O&M cost of $501,900.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water cleanup levels are provided based
on MCLs and several TBCs. Individual goals
include TCE 0.005 mg/1 (MCL), benzene 0.005
mg/1 (MCL), PCE 0.007 mg/1 (RSD), toluene 2.0
mg/1 (PMCLG), RDX 0.035 mg/1 (USAIWQC),
TNT 0.044 mg/1 (PPLV), lead 0.05 mg/1.
Individual soil cleanup goals include PCBs 10
mg/kg (TSCA), RDX 95 mg/kg (PPLV), TNT 305
mg/kg (PPLV), and CS 43.3 mg/kg (PPLV).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls will be implemented; however, none were
specified.
84
-------
KEYWORDS: Arsenic; Benzene; Capping;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Chromium; Clean
Water Act; Direct Contact; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; Inorganics; Institutional Controls;
Landfill Closure; Lead; MCLs; Metals; O&M;
Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment; PCE;
Pesticides; RCRA; Closure Requirements; Safe
Drinking Water Act; Sediment; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water; Surface
Water Monitoring; TCE; Toluene; Toxic
Substances Control Act; Treatability Studies;
Water Quality Criteria; VOCs.
CIBA-GEIGY (MCINTOSH PLANT), AL
First Remedial Action
September 28, 1989
The 1,500-acre Ciba-Geigy (Mclntosh Plant) site
is in southern Washington County, northeast of
Mclntosh, Alabama. The plant's initial
operations, which began in 1952, were devoted
solely to the manufacture of DDT. In 1970, the
facility expanded its manufacturing operations to
include herbicides, insecticides, and chelating and
sequestering agents. Other products produced by
Ciba-Geigy include resins and additives used in
the plastics industry. Wastes and residues
generated during production operations were
managed onsite. In 1985, EPA issued Ciba-Geigy
a RCRA Part B permit for active waste
management units onsite. The permit included a
corrective action plan requiring Ciba-Geigy to
remove and treat contaminated ground water and
surface water at the site. In 1987, as part of this
plan, Ciba-Geigy installed a ground water
pumping and treatment system which has been
effective in addressing the ground water
contamination. This first of three planned
operable units addresses ground water
contamination in the shallow Alluvial aquifer.
The second operable unit will address the deeper
Miocene aquifer and the final operable unit will
address contamination of soil at eleven former
waste management areas. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the ground
water are VOCs including benzene and toluene;
other organics including pesticides; and metals
including arsenic.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
no further action for the shallow aquifer beyond
continued ground water pumping and onsite
treatment using an existing biological wastewater
treatment system, followed by discharge to the
Tombigbee River under an NPDES permit; and
ground water and effluent monitoring. The
estimated annual O&M cost for this remedial
action is $325,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water cleanup goals are based on SDWA
MCLs or PMCLs. Ground water cleanup goals
include benzene 5.0 ug/1 (MCL), toluene 2,000
ug/1 (PMCL), and arsenic 50 ug/l (MCL).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROT5!: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Arsenic; Benzene; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Water Act; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; MCLs; MCLGs;
Metals; No Action Remedy; O&M; Offsite
Discharge; Organics; Pesticides; RCRA; Safe
Drinking Water Act; Toluene; VOCs.
KASSOUF-KIMERLING BATTERY, EL
First Remedial Action
March 31, 1989
The Kassouf-Kimerling Battery site, formerly
known as the Timber Lake Battery Disposal and
the 58th Street Landfill, is in Tampa, Florida.
The site consists of a 42,000 square feet landfill
area in which empty lead-acid battery casing and
fill dirt were deposited in September 1978. The
estimated volume of fill is 11,350 cubic yards.
Land use in the area . includes residential,
commercial, and industrial development to the
south; and undeveloped land occupied by small
lakes and marshes to the north, east, and west.
Surface water flows from the west marsh to the
east marsh by way of a canal cut through the site
and eventually discharges into the Palm River.
This remedy addresses the landfill wastes and
contaminated underlying soil. A second and final
operable unit will address contaminated sediment
and surface water in the adjacent wetlands. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
soil, debris, and ground water are metals
including arsenic, cadmium, and lead.
85
-------
The selected remedial action for this site includes
excavation of the landfill wastes and contaminated
underlying soil, followed by treatment using
solidification/chemical fixation and onsite disposal
in the landfill area. Specific protocols for
treatment will be determined by bench-scale
testing. The estimated present worth cost for this
remedial action is $2,500,000 - $3,500,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The soil and debris in the source area will be
treated to meet RCRA criteria including EP
toxicity concentrations. Ground water standards
including MCLs and AWQC will be met over a
short period of time due to the excavation and
fixation of the landfill materials.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS; Not applicable.
KEYWORDS; Arsenic; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Water Act; Debris; Direct
Contact; Excavation; Floodplain; Ground Water;
Lead; Metals; MCLs; MCLGs; Onsite Disposal;
Onsite Treatment; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water
Act; Soil; Solidification/Stabilization; Treatability
Studies; Treatment Technology; Water Quality
Criteria.
NEWSOM BROTHERS/OLD REICHHOLD, MS
First Remedial Action - Final
September 18, 1989
The 81-acre Newsom Brothers/Old Reichhold site
is in Marion County, Columbia, Mississippi. The
site is in a predominantly residential area and was
used as a wood processing facility under several
owners from 1936 until 1977, when a fire and
explosion destroyed the facility. Site activities
included producing tall oils, turpentine, calcium
and zinc resinates, and polymerized and rubber
resins. Furthermore, PCP was apparently mixed
with diesel oil and sold, and xylenes were used in
a number of processes. A State investigation in
1976 revealed that wastewater containing phenols,
oil, and grease was discharging to a small creek.
Further investigations resulted in EPA performing
an immediate removal action in 1984, which
included the removal of over 600 surface drums
from the site and excavating and draining two
ponds, one of which was subsequently filled with
clean fill. Onsite buried drum areas were the
target of another EPA removal action conducted
from 1987 to 1988. Approximately 3,900 drums
were excavated and shredded; drum contents were
disposed of offsite; and 1,920 tons of soil were
removed. In addition there is an extensive system
of concrete drains that served to collect and drain
spilled wastes and rainwater that has an area of
runoff of approximately 300,000 square feet.
There is an estimated 650 cubic yards of bulk
hazardous substances remaining onsite consisting
of black tar-like waste material and a resin
material in three excavations and in the drainage
system. The primary contaminants of concern
affecting the soil, sediment, and bulked wastes are
organics including PAHs, PCBs, and PCP; and
metals.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
excavation and offsite disposal of 30,300 cubic
yards of contaminated soil and 7,300 cubic yards
of contaminated pond and creek sediment;
excavation and offsite incineration of 650 cubic
yards of tar-like waste material and any
soil/sediment containing RCRA hazardous wastes,
followed by offcite disposal; draining, filling, and
capping onsite ponds; recontouring the site; and
ground water monitoring for five years. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $14,180,000, which includes an estimated
present worth O&M cost of $520,225.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil, sediment, and waste material cleanup goals
were based on 10"* excess-cancer risk. A
chemical-specific soil and sediment goal was
selected for cPAHs as 10 mg/kg. Additional
soil/sediment levels were developed for other
organic-contaminated areas including PCP 1.2
mg/kg.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Capping; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act;
Direct Contact; Excavation; Filling; Ground
Water Monitoring; Incineration/Thermal
Destruction; Leachability Tests; Metals; Offsite
Disposal; Offsite Treatment; O&M; Onsite
Discharge; Organics; PAHs; PCBs; RCRA;
Sediment; Soil; State Permit; State
86
-------
Standards/Regulations; Toluene; Toxic Substances
Control Act; Treatment Technology; Water
Quality Criteria.
SMITH'S FARM, KY
First Remedial Action
September 29, 1989
The Smith's Farm site is a 560-acre property in
a rural area of Bullitt County, Kentucky. The
site is bordered on the north, east, and west by
forested hills and on the south by a residential
area. Within the 560-acre property there is a
37.5-acre landfill that, until recently, was
permitted by the State for the disposal of solid
waste. The owner of this landfill was cited at
various times by the State for permit violations.
The property also includes an 80-acre area
upgradient of the permitted landfill on a
mile-long ridge between two intermittent creeks
where the unpermitted disposal of drums
containing hazardous waste occurred over a
20-year period. EPA investigations from 1979 to
1984 resulted in the removal of 6,000 surface
drums containing hazardous waste including
PCB-contaminated waste. This remedy addresses
contaminated onsite soil, sediment, and drums
within the 80-acre area. A second operable unit
will address the remaining potential threats
associated with the landfill, deep ground water
aquifers, and other suspected areas of drum
disposal. The primary contaminants of concern
affecting the soil and sediment are organics
including PCBs and PAHs, and metals including
lead.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
excavation and onsite incineration of
approximately 26,200 cubic yards of contaminated
soil, surface drums, buried drums, and fill
material from Area B (as defined in the RI/FS),
and approximately 5,200 cubic yards of
contaminated onsite sediment from the valley
streams; solidification/fixation of approximately
50 percent of the treated material followed by
placement of all treated or solidified material in
Area B; incineration of a small volume of hot
spot material in Area A and consolidation of
waste and construction of a RCRA cap over Area
A; construction of a leachate-collection system to
collect leachate from Area A; access restrictions
(fencing) around contaminated areas; ground
water monitoring for up to 27 years; maintenance
of the RCRA cap and the leachate collection
system; and leachate removal and disposal for up
to 30 years. The estimated present worth cost for
this remedy is $26,900,000, which includes O&M
costs of $1,330,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Action levels for contaminated soil and/or
sediment were determined based on an excess
lifetime cancer risk of lO"5 with the exception of
lead which was based on a hazard index less than
1. Specified goals include cPAHs 5 mg/kg, PCBs
2 mg/kg, and lead 500 mg/kg.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Capping; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act;
Closure Requirements; Debris; Direct Contact;
Excavation; Ground Water Monitoring;
Incineration/Thermal Destruction; Leachate
Collection; Lead; MCLs; Metals; O&M; Onsite
Disposal; Onsite Treatment; Organics; PAHs;
PCBs; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act;
Sediment; Soil; Solidification/Stabilization; State
Standards/Regulations; Toxic Substances Control
Act; Treatment Technology.
STAUFFER CHEMICAL/COLD CREEK, AL
First Remedial Action
September 27, 1989
The Stauffer Chemical Cold/Creek site is in
Bucks, Mobile County, Alabama, approximately 20
miles north of Mobile, Alabama. The area is
predominantly industrial, with a few small rural
residential communities within a few miles of the
site. The Mobile River borders the site to the
east. The Cold Creek plant began operating in
1966 under the ownership of the Stauffer
Chemical Company and is currently owned and
operated by ICI Americas, Inc. Until 1974, an
unknown amount of sludge and solid wastes
containing a variety of herbicides and pesticides
were placed in two waste disposal sites, referred
to as the Cold Creek North and South Landfills.
Both were closed in 1974 with geomembrane caps
and side-wall liners. One clay-lined lagoon was
used for neutralization of wastewater until 1975,
87
-------
and was closed in 1978. A new membrane-lined
pond was constructed to replace it and is
currently in use. Under a consent agreement with
EPA, Stauffer completed a remedial investigation
in May 1988, which identified contamination of
the soil, pond sludge, swamp sediment, and
ground water. Although there are four media of
concern at the Stauffer site, this remedial action
addresses the contaminated ground water, because
ground water is the source for drinking water for
the area. Additional RODs are planned for the
source control operable units and the Cold Creek
Swamp. The primary contaminants of concern
affecting the ground water are VOCs including
carcinogenic compounds such as carbon
tetrachloride, and other organic compounds
including pesticides.
The selected remedial action for the ground water
operable unit at this site includes a modified
ground water intercept and treatment system with
surface water discharge. This alternative involves
continued operation of the existing intercept and
treatment system, which consists of aeration via
spray nozzles with discharge to a treatment pond
and then to the Mobile River; installation of
additional extraction wells, based on ground water
quality characteristics, water-table gradients, and
pumping activities at the site and adjacent
properties; design and implementation of
modifications to the treatment system; and
monitoring of effluent, ground water
concentrations, and pumping rates. Further
investigation and treatability studies are necessary
before EPA can determine the remedial action for
the source units (soil and pond sediment) and the
swamp. Bench and/or pilot-scale testing of in-situ
treatment alternatives for some of the source
units, such as a wastewater treatment pond, is
appropriate as part of the remedial design. A
range of treatment technologies including thermal
desorption and vapor extraction is being
considered. The estimated total capital cost for
this remedial action is $3,119,200, which includes
O&M costs. Specific O&M costs were not
provided.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water will meet State and Federal
ARARs including MCLs and risk reference doses
(RfDs) developed by EPA Chemical-specific
cleanup goals include carbon tetrachloride 5 ug/1
(MCL). Surface water discharge must meet
concentration limits specified in the NPDES
permit.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Aeration; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Water Act; Direct Contact;
Drinking Water Contaminants; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; MCLs; Metals; O&M; Onsite
Discharge; Onsite Treatment; Organics; Pesticides;
RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act; Treatability
Tests; Treatment Technology; VOCs.
STAUFFER CHEMTCAL/LEMOYNE, AL
First Remedial Action
September 27, 1989
The Stauffer Chemical LeMoyne site is in Axis,
Mobile County, Alabama, approximately 20 miles
north of Mobile, Alabama. The area is
predominantly industrial, with a few small rural
residential communities within a few miles of the
site. The Mobile River borders the site to the
east. The LeMoyne facility was previously owned
by the Stauffer Chemical Company, which began
operations in 1953. Now the RCRA-permitted
facility is currently owned and operated by Akzo
Chemicals, Inc., which purchased the facility in
1987. Multi-product organic and inorganic
chemicals are manufactured at the facility. From
1965 to 1974, under the operation of Stauffer,
waste from the plant was placed in an unlined
landfill located approximately one mile east of the
main plant. The waste included 11,000 to 12,000
tons of brine muds in addition to plant refuse,
used samples, and absorption oil. The landfill
was closed in 1975 with an impermeable
membrane cap and side-wall liner. Wastewaters
from the processes were held in ponds, some of
which discharged to the Cold Creek Swamp. All
of the ponds except one are clay lined and have
been closed under the direction of the State.
New membrane-lined ponds were installed during
the 1970s to replace the closed ponds. Under a
consent agreement with EPA, Stauffer completed
a remedial investigation in May 1988, which
identified contamination of the soil, pond sludge,
swamp sediment, and ground water. Although
there are four media of concern at the Stauffer
-------
site, this remedial action addresses the
contaminated ground water, because ground water
is the source for drinking water for the area.
Additional RODs are planned for the source
control operable units and the Cold Creek Swamp
operable unit The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the ground water are VOCs
including carcinogenic compounds such as carbon
tetrachloride, and other organic compounds
including pesticides.
The selected remedial action for the ground water
operable unit at this site includes a modified
ground water intercept and treatment system with
surface water discharge. This alternative involves
continued operation of the existing intercept and
treatment system, which consists of aeration via
spray nozzles with discharges to a treatment pond
and then to the Mobile River; installation of
additional extraction wells, based on ground water
quality characteristics, water-table gradients, and
pumping activities at the site and adjacent
properties; design and implementation of
modifications to the treatment system; and
monitoring of effluent, ground water
concentrations, and pumping rates. Further
investigation and treatability studies are necessary
before EPA can determine the remedial action for
the source units (soil and pond sediment) and the
swamp. Bench and/or pilot-scale testing of in-situ
treatment alternatives for some of the source
units, such as a wastewater treatment pond, is
appropriate as part of the remedial design. A
range of treatment technologies including thermal
desorption and vapor extraction is being
considered. The estimated total capital cost for
this remedial action is $3,119,200, which includes
O&M costs. Specific O&M costs were not
provided.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOAIA
Ground water will meet State and Federal
ARARs including MCLs and RfDs developed by
EPA Chemical-specific cleanup goals include
carbon tetrachloride 5 ugA (MCL). Surface water
discharge must meet concentration limits specified
in the NPDES permit.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Aeration; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Water Act; Direct Contact;
Drinking Water Contaminants; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; MCLs; Metals; O&M; Onsite
Discharge; Onsite Treatment; Organics; Pesticides;
RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act; Treatability
Tests; Treatment Technology, VOCs.
SYDNEY MINE SLUDGE PONDS, FL
First Remedial Action - Final
September 29, 1989
The Sydney Mine Sludge Ponds site occupies 9.5
acres of a 1,700-acre former phosphate mining
site in Brandon, Hillsborough County, Florida.
From 1973 to 1981 the county rented the site for
disposal of septic wastes, waste automotive oils,
grease trap wastes, and manufacturing cutting oils.
An estimated 16 million gallons of wastes were
deposited in three small pits. An EPA site
investigation in 1979 identified organics and heavy
metal contamination in monitoring wells near the
waste pits. Sampling was also performed in
Turkey Creek which flows through the mine site
about a mile from the waste pits. Upstream and
downstream sediment samples exhibited elevated
levels of metals. Disposal operations ended in
September 1981 when the State denied issuance
of a second operation permit for the site. The
State and county began a two-phase cleanup
effort in 1984. The first phase included
construction of a slurry wall around the waste
pits; excavation and onsite incineration of
approximately 10,900 cubic yards of pit wastes;
and pumping and onsite treatment of ground
water. The second phase included excavation of
approximately 15,000 cubic yards of contaminated
soil with onsite treatment by air-drying followed
by offsite disposal. This operable unit addresses
ground water contamination at the site. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
ground water are VOCs including benzene,
toluene, TCE, and xylenes.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
continued ground water pumping with onsite
treatment by air stripping and spray irrigation on
land adjacent to the waste disposal site;
evaluation of the existing ground water pumping
and treatment system and implementation of any
necessary modifications to improve the operation;
continued ground water monitoring; and
89
-------
implementation of deed and ground water use
restrictions. The estimated present worth cost for
the selected remedy is $2,448,000 which includes
an annual O&M cost of $576,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The ground water remediation goals are based on
State primary drinking water standards (PDWS)
or PMCLs. Chemical-specific goals were provided
for nine chemicals of concern including benzene
1 ug/1 (PDWS) and toluene 2,000 ug/1 (PMCL).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed
restrictions will be implemented to restrict ground
water use onsite and within a reasonable distance
of the site.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Benzene;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Water Act;
Closure Requirements; Direct Contact; Ground
Water, Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; Institutional Controls; MCLs; MCLGs;
O&M; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment;
Plume Management; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water
Act; State Standards/Regulations; TCE; Toluene;
VOCs; Water Quality Criteria; Xylenes.
90
-------
RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
REGION V
(Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Wisconsin)
ADRIAN MUNICIPAL WELL FIELD, MN
First Remedial Action - Final
September 29, 1989
The Adrian Municipal Well Field site is in
Adrian, Nobles County, Minnesota, a city which
relies solely on ground water for its municipal
water supply. In 1983 the State detected VOC
contamination in two of the six wells at the site,
and by 1985 the city had replaced the
VOC-contaminated wells with two new wells.
Subsequent ground water sampling indicated that
petroleum releases from underground storage
tanks (UST) are sources for soil and ground
water contamination. Although ground water
contaminant concentrations exceed Federal and
State drinking water and surface water standards,
no further action will be taken by the Superfund
program because the program does not have the
authority to address clean up of petroleum
releases. EPA will, however, formally transfer the
site to its UST program in October 1989 for
further action. There are no costs associated with
this remedial action.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOATS-
Not applicable.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: No further action.
ALSCO ANACONDA, OH
First Remedial Action
September 8, 1989
The Alsco Anaconda site is a 4.8-acre former
sludge disposal area in Gnadenhutten, Tuscarawas
County, Ohio. The site lies within the
Tuscarawas River's 50- and 100-year floodplains
and neighbors the Alsco Anaconda aluminum
manufacturing plant which has operated since
1948. Contamination at the site occurred from
1965 to 1978 when wastewater and wastewater
treatment sludge from the plant, containing
hazardous aluminum processing wastes (FO19),
was disposed of in an unlined settling basin and
a sludge pit. In 1978 the plant owners began
dewatering the treatment sludge prior to disposal
of sludge offsite in the settling basin and a former
swamp area. This ROD is the first of two
operable units at the site and addresses
remediation of the contaminated soil and sludge.
Because leaehate from the sludge may have
contaminated the ground water and surface water,
a subsequent ROD will address the appropriate
remedial action for those media. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil and
sludge are organics including PCBs, and metals
including chromium, cyanide, and arsenic.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
excavating 50 cubic yards of sludge contaminated
with greater than 500 mg/kg of PCBs followed by
offeite incineration and disposal; excavating 8,820
cubic yards of aluminum processing waste sludge
and underlying soil from the settling basin and
sludge pit contaminated with less than 500 mg/kg
of PCBs followed by offsite treatment and
disposal or reuse; backfilling and revegetating
excavated areas; and implementing institutional
controls including site access and deed
restrictions. The estimated capital cost for this
remedial action is $4,161,066 with no associated
O&M costs.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GO AT 51:
Soil cleanup goals will meet clean closure levels
which require soil and sludge to be excavated
until remaining soil contaminant concentrations
attain a cumulative excess cancer-risk level below
10"6 and a cumulative hazard index value of less
than one for critical effect. Chemical-specific
cleanup goals were not specified but will be
established during the remedial design.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Site access and
deed restrictions will implemented.
91
-------
KEYWORDS; Arsenic; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Clean Closure; Direct
Contact; Excavation; Filling; Floodplain;
Incineration; Institutional Controls; MCLs;
Metals; Offsite Disposal; Oflsite Treatment;
Organics; PCBs; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water
Act; Sludge; Soil; Stabilization/Solidification; State
Standards/Regulations; Toxic Substances Control
Act; Treatment Technology.
AUTO ION CHEMICALS, MI
First Remedial Action
September 27, 1989
Auto Ion Chemicals site is a former plating waste
treatment and disposal facility occupying
approximately 1.5 acres of vacant, fenced land in
Kalamazoo, Michigan. The site is bounded to the
north, east, and west by commercial/industrial
facilities and lies adjacent to and within the
floodplain of the Kalamazoo River. Ground
water at the site is not currently used as a source
of drinking water. From 1964 to 1973 the facility
received chrome and cyanide plating waste.
Heavy metals were precipitated from the plating
waste and deposited in an onsite lagoon, and
wastewater was discharged to the sanitary sewer.
Leaks and spills from storage tanks, lagoon
seepage, and other site activities resulted in soil
contamination. In 1983 EPA conducted an
emergency surface removal and, in 1986, they
demolished the site structures which housed tanks
and storage facilities. This first operable unit
represents a source control remedial action for
the soil. A second operable unit will address
ground water contamination. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil are
organics including PAHs; and metals including
arsenic, chromium, and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
excavation and offsite stabilization of
approximately 7,200 cubic yards of contaminated
soil; offsite disposal of treated soil in an approved
land disposal area; and replacement of the
excavated soil with clean fill. The estimated
capital cost for this remedial action is $3,332,988,
with an estimated annual O&M cost of $5,900.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil posing a carcinogenic health risk greater than
10"* will be excavated and treated to meet RCRA
land disposal restrictions for soil contaminated
with F006 waste. The treated soil must pass the
TCLP test prior to offsite land disposal.
Chemical-specific contaminant goals were not
specified.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Arsenic; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Closure Requirements;
Direct Contact; Excavation; Filling; Floodplain;
Leachability Tests; Lead; Metals; Offsite Disposal;
Offeite Treatment; O&M; Organics; PAHs;
RCRA; Soil; Solidification/Stabilization; State
Standards/Regulations.
BIG D CAMPGROUND, OH
First Remedial Action - Final
September 29, 1989
The Big D Campground site is in Kingsville,
Ashtablua County, Ohio. The site consists of a
1.2-acre landfill created out of a former sand and
gravel quarry. From 1964 to 1976 the site owner
accepted approximately 28,000 cubic yards of
hazardous materials for disposal which included
up to 5,000 drums containing solvents, caustics,
and oily substances. A 1986 remedial
investigation identified the landfill as the primary
source of contamination in soil outside the
landfill and ground water underlying the landfill.
Ground water contamination is of significant
concern because it is migrating towards the
drinking water supply wells of nearby residences
and Conneaut Creek which is adjacent to and
south of the site. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil and ground water are
VOCs including PCE and TCE; other organics;
and metals including chromium and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
removing and incinerating up to 5,000 buried
drums, bulk wastes, and up to 30,000 cubic yards
of contaminated soil followed by onsite disposal
of nonhazardous ash residue; pumping and
treatment of 40,000,000 to 60,000,000 gallons of
ground water using an onsite granular activated
carbon system followed by onsite discharge to
92
-------
Conneaut Creek; and ground water and surface
water monitoring. The estimated present worth
cost for this remedial action is $39,000,000, which
includes annual O&M costs of $320,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
This remedial action will reduce health risks
identified in the ground water to a cumulative
hazard index of 1.0 or less and a cumulative
carcinogenic risk of 10"6 or less. Ground water
cleanup goals are based on MCLs and include
TCE 5 ug/1 and chromium 50 ug/1.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed and land
use restrictions will be implemented.
KEYWORDS: Carbon Adsorption (GAG);
Carcinogenic Compounds; Chromium; Clean Air
Act; ~ Clean Water Act; Direct Contact;
Excavation; Filling; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Incineration/Thermal Destruction; Institutional
Controls; Lead; MCLs; Metals; O&M; Onsite
.Discharge; Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment;
Organics; PCE; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act;
Soil; State Standards/Regulations; Surface Water
Monitoring; TCE; Treatability Studies; Treatment
Technology; VOCs.
BOWERS LANDFILL, OH
First Remedial Action - Final
March 24, 1989
The 12-acre Bowers Landfill site is in rural
Pickaway County, Ohio, within the Scioto River
floodplain. Fifteen residences lie within a
0.5-mile radius of the site. Information on the
types and quantities of waste disposed of at the
site is not readily available; however, landfill
operations, which started in 1958, consisted solely
of municipal refuse disposal until 1963. From
1963 to 1968, however, industrial refuse and
chemical wastes were also disposed of at the site.
Operations ended in 1968. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil,
sediment, debris, and ground water are VOCs
including PCE and benzene; other organics
including PAHs and PCBs; metals including lead
and chromium; and other inorganics.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
removal of surface vegetation and debris such as
domestic waste and drums followed by offsite
disposal at a hazardous waste landfill or solid
waste landfill if wastes are determined to be
nonhazardous; erosion controls including surface
regrading in areas prone to flooding and erosion;
excavation and dewatering of drainage ditch
sediment followed by onsite disposal; replacement
of the discharge pipe; construction of a soil and
clay cap with quarterly inspections for leachate
and gas formation; implementation of site access
and ground water use restrictions; and ground
water monitoring. The estimated present worth
cost for this remedial action is $4,300,000, which
includes annual O&M costs of $116,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Chemical-specific cleanup goals were not
provided; however, cleanup levels will be based
on MCLs where available and a 10"* cancer risk
for all other contaminants.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Site access and
ground water use restrictions will be implemented
at the site.
KEYWORDS: Benzene; Capping; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Debris; Drinking Water
Contaminants; Excavation; Floodplain; Ground
Water; Ground Water Monitoring; Inorganics;
Institutional Controls; Landfill Closure; Lead;
MCLs; Metals; O&M; Offsite Disposal; Onsite
Disposal; Organics; PAHs; PCE; Plume
Management; Public Exposure; RCRA; Safe
Drinking Water Act; Sediment; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations; VOCs.
BYRON SALVAGE YARD, IL
Third Remedial Action
June 30, 1989
The Byron Salvage Yard site is in rural Ogle
County, Illinois and is approximately 3 miles
southwest of the city of Byron. The site, which
includes the Byron Salvage Yard and Dirk's Farm,
is bordered by a forest preserve district to the
north, an operating nuclear plant to the
southeast, residential property to the south, and
an open field to the west. The site is bisected
by two 15 to 30 feet deep ravines draining surface
93
-------
water runoff through the ravine waterways to the
south branch of Woodland Creek, which flows to
the Rock River. During the 1960s the salvage
yard owner accepted miscellaneous wastes and
debris for disposal including drums of
electroplating wastes, oil sludges, cutting wheels,
solvents, and scrap metal. Industrial waste
dumping reportedly occurred on the site during
periods of heavy rainfall so that most of the waste
would be carried offsite by the resulting surface
water runoff. In 1976 the Illinois EPA
documented the presence of cyanide and heavy
metals in soil, surface water, and ground water in
and around the site. In 1986 the State initiated
cleanup activities which included excavating buried
drums from the ravines; removing surface drums;
excavating soil heavily contaminated by heavy
metals or organics; and excavating soil with
concentrations 100 mg/kg or greater of cyanide.
In-situ treatment of cyanide- contaminated soil
less than 100 mg/kg was performed but low levels
of cyanide still remain. Water quality sampling,
performed in 1984, revealed that offsite ground
water was contaminated with VOCs, primarily
TCE. The two aquifers which underlie and
surround the site contain elevated levels of VOCs,
metals, and cyanide. Private residential water
supply wells that were affected by the
contaminated ground water were temporarily
supplied with bottled drinking water. In 1986 an
EPA-approved emergency action led to the
installation of in-house carbon filtration units at
ten residences in the Rock River Terrace
subdivision located a 1/2 mile northwest of the
site. A 1986 State ROD extended the municipal
water supply system from Byron to the Rock
River Terrace subdivision. This operable unit
addresses the ground water contamination
emanating from the site and is the third of four
operable units. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the ground water are VOCs
including benzene, PCE, and TCE; metals
including arsenic, chromium, and lead; and other
inorganics including cyanide.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
removing all wastes generated during the remedial
investigation; adding a one-foot soil cover to the
affected portions of the site and regrading and
revegetating the new surface; monitoring surface
and ground water; plugging and abandoning
monitoring wells no longer in use; providing an
alternate source of drinking water by extending
the water main of the municipal system to 27
additional residences; and implementing
institutional controls. The estimated present
worth cost is $1,100,000, which includes annual
O&M costs of $16,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Because an alternate water supply will be
provided, MCLs for ground water contaminants
will not be exceeded at the tap for affected
residents. In lieu of MCLs, EPA is establishing
cleanup levels based on alternate concentration
limits (ACLs) which will be set at contaminant
concentrations currently found in the aquifers.
Maximum concentration limits, for Ambient
Water Quality Criteria and/or State Water Quality
Standards, will be attained in a nearby pond and
river.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls will be implemented to preclude future
use of the ground water in undeveloped areas
where the ground water is contaminated due to
the site. These controls may include deed
restrictions or mandatory hookups to public water
supplies, plugging and abandoning residential
wells, and/or other such actions.
KEYWORDS; ACL; Alternate Water Supply;
Arsenic; Benzene; Carcinogenic Compounds;
Chromium; Drinking Water Contaminants;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Institutional Controls; Lead; MCLs; Metals;
O&M; Offeite Disposal; PCE; Public Exposure;
RCRA; State Permit; State Standards/Regulations;
Surface Water Monitoring; TCE; VOCs; Water
Quality Criteria.
CEMETERY DUMP, MI
Second Remedial Action - Final
September 29, 1989
The 4-acre Cemetery Dump site is a former sand
and gravel pit in Rose Township, Oakland
County, Michigan. During the late 1960s or early
1970s, approximately 300 to 600 drums,
containing paint sludges, solvents, PCBs, and oils,
were illegally dumped and buried onsite. A 1985
ROD addressed the soil cleanup which included
excavation and offsite disposal of
94
-------
visually-contaminated soil and drum fragments.
Soil which was not visually contaminated was
sampled and backfilled with clean soil into the
excavated areas. Subsequent soil and ground
water sampling indicated that zinc contaminants
in the ground water exceed the Federal secondary
MCL, a nonenforceable standard based on taste
and odor, not protection of health. Zinc
contamination, however, is most likely a result of
monitoring well construction materials. No other
contaminants exceed Federal or State
environmental standards.
The selected remedial action for this site is no
further action because previous remedial activities
appear to provide adequate protection to human
health and the environment. Ground water will
be monitored annually, and a 5-year review will
be performed to ensure that the site continues to
pose no threat to human health and the
environment. There are no costs associated with
.this no action remedy.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Not applicable.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: No Action Remedy.
CUFFS/DOW DUMP, MI
First Remedial Action - Final
September 27, 1989
The municipally owned 2-acre Cliffs/Dow Dump
site is in a wooded recreational area adjacent to
the Dead River in Marquette, Michigan. From
1954 until the early 1960s wastes generated by
the Cliffs-Dow Chemical Company's charcoal
manufacturing plant were deposited at the site.
The wastes, which included tar and
tar-contaminated fill materials, were deposited to
fill a small bog depression. The 200. cubic yards
of exposed tar deposits are the primary source of
contamination in the soil; however, the remaining
9,400 cubic yards of fill material containing
charcoal and wood intermingled with
approximately 200 cubic yards of tar, are also a
contamination source. Results of pilot studies
indicate that ground water is undergoing in-situ
biodegradation as it flows downgradient of the
fill and poses no risk to human health or the
environment. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil are VOCs including
benzene, toluene, PCE, and xylenes; and other
organics including PAHs and phenol.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
excavation and offsite incineration of 200 cubic
yards of exposed tars; excavation of 9,400 cubic
yards of fill material intermingled with tars, and
segregation followed by oflsite incineration of 200
cubic yards of buried tars encountered during the
excavation; forced aeration biological treatment of
the 9,200 cubic yards of residual contaminated fill
material after replacement in the excavated area;
installing a soil cover and revegetation of
bioremediated fill area; implementation of
institutional controls including deed restrictions
preventing new well installation and disturbance
of fill material until health-based goals have been
achieved; and ground water and air monitoring.
The estimated present worth cost for this
remedial action is $2,842,165, which includes
estimated annual O&M costs of $63,280.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water contaminant levels, which are
already below levels of concern, will further
decrease through biodegradation and natural
attenuation once the source material is removed.
EPA's Superfund Public Health Evaluation
Manual was used to develop health-based goals
for source areas; however, no chemical-specific
goals were provided.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed
restrictions will be implemented to prevent the
future use of ground water, including the
establishment of drinking water wells within the
vicinity of the contaminated ground water
boundaries, and will also prohibit disturbances of
the fill materials during the biological treatment
process until health-based goals have been
achieved.
KEYWORDS: Acids; Air Monitoring; Benzene;
Biodegradation/Land Application; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Air Act; Closure
Requirements; Direct Contact; Excavation;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Incineration/Thermal Destruction; Institutional
Controls; MCLs; Offsite Treatment; O&M; Onsite
95
-------
Disposal; Onsite Treatment; Organics; PAHs;
PCE; Phenols; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act;
Soil; State Standards/Regulations; Toluene;
Trcatability Studies; Treatment Technology;
VOCs; Xylenes.
CROSS BROTHERS PAIL (PEMBROKE), IL
First Remedial Action - Final
September 28, 1989
The Cross Brothers Pail site is a former pail and
drum recycling operation located in Pembroke
Township, Kankakee County, Illinois. The
20-acre site, approximately half of which was used
for waste disposal, is in a semi- residential area
interspersed with small farms. Recycling
operations, which involved draining empty drums
and pails containing paints, dyes, and inks onto
the ground, resulted in the formation of a waste
residue layer approximately 6 inches thick over 10
acres of the property. In addition crushed pails
and drums were buried in 10 trenches located
around the site. Operations continued at the site
from 1961 until 1980 when the State closed the
site and ordered a cleanup. An Initial Remedial
Measure was signed in 1985 which required
clearing the disposal area of all vegetation and
removing 6,438 tons of contaminated surficial soil,
542 drums containing wastes, and 572 empty
drums. From 1986 to 1989 the State conducted
additional studies to define the nature and extent
of ground water and residual soil contamination.
The site can be divided into two areas: a 6.5-acre
area characterized by small local areas of soil
contamination and a 3.5-acre area that contains
contamination throughout the unsaturated zone
(approximately 33,800 cubic yards of soil).
Ground water contamination is the principal
threat at the site. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil and ground water are
VOCs including benzene, PCE, TCE, toluene, and
Clones; and other organics including PCBs.
The selected remedial action for this site has been
divided into two operable units. The first
involves resampling a localized PCB-contaminated
soil area followed by excavation and offsite
incineration of approximately 5 cubic yards
(dependent upon resampling results) of soil with
a PCB level exceeding 10 mg/kg/. The second
operable unit addresses ground water and soil
remediation. The 6.5-acre area will be covered
with a 6-inch vegetative cover, and the 3.5-acre
area will be covered by 6 inches of gravel.
Ground water will be pumped and treated onsite
with discharge onto the 3.5-acre gravel area via an
irrigation system, thus establishing a "cleansing
loop" and inducing soil flushing through the area
of VOC contamination. Deed and access
restrictions will be implemented. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action is
$2,076,500, which includes an annual O&M cost
of $59,235 for 15 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water cleanup levels will meet currently
promulgated MCLs, a cumulative excess lifetime
cancer risk not exceeding 10"*, and a hazard index
ratio less than or equal to 1. No
chemical-specific ground water cleanup goals were
provided. PCB-contaminated soil will be
excavated such that a level less than 10 mg/kg
(based on TSCA Spill Policy) remains onsite.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: The site will
be secured through the installation of fencing and
the initiation of a deed notification requirement
identifying EPA and State concerns regarding
activities at the site.
KEYWORDS: Benzene; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Air Act; Excavation; Ground
Water; Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; Incineration/Thermal Destruction;
Institutional Controls; MCLs; O&M; Offcite
Disposal; Offsite Treatment; Onsite Discharge;
Onsite Treatment; Organics; PCBs; PCE; Plume
Management; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act;
Soil; Soil Washing/Flushing; State Guidance; State
Permit; State Standards/Regulations; TCE;
Toluene; Toxic Substances Control Act;
Treatment Technology; VOCs; Xylenes.
EJt SCHILLING LANDFILL, OH
First Remedial Action - Final
September 29, 1989
The E.H. Schilling Landfill site is in Hamilton
Township, Lawrence County, Ohio. The site is
a 2.7-acre landfill on a larger tract of land. The
predominantly rural area neighboring the site
includes approximately 50 residences, which are
96
-------
between 0.25 mile and 1.5 miles from the site.
The landfill was created by constructing a dam
across a small valley. Both the landfill cover and
dam have been described as inadequate, and
leachate containing hazardous substances is being
released through and beneath the dam. From
1969 to 1980 the landfill operators accepted both
nonhazardous and hazardous wastes including
styrene, phenol, acetone, alcohol, wastewater
treatment sludge, coal tar compounds, and
ciimene. Results from a 1988 investigation reveal
that soil and sediment contamination is limited to
the area immediately adjacent to the dam, and
ground water contamination is limited to the
monitoring wells immediately surrounding the
landfill and the monitoring wells downgradient of
the dam. Contamination appears to be due to
leachate runoff. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil, sediment, and ground
water are VOCs including benzene; other organics
including PAHs, pesticides, and phenol; and
metals including arsenic.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
excavation of 500 cubic yards of sediment and 750
cubic yards of surface soil for consolidation in the
landfill; construction of a 2.7-acre RCRA cap to
contain 100,000 cubic yards of landfill waste;
construction of a clay berm to improve dam
stability; construction of a perimeter cut-off wall
to eliminate the lateral flow of ground water into
the landfill waste; construction of an interceptor
drain outside the cut-off wall to drain ground
water away from the landfill; dewatering the
landfill of 7,000,000 gallons of leachate and
treating the leachate using air stripping, and
carbon adsorption to remove organics and sulfide
precipitation to remove inorganics, followed by
discharge to surface water; treatment and
discharge of an additional 1,000,000 gallons of
wastewater generated during the remedial action;
ground water monitoring; and implementation of
access and institutional controls. The estimated
capital cost for this remedial action is $6,444,000,
with an estimated annual O&M cost of $99,000
for 30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil will be excavated and consolidated to achieve
a cumulative risk of less than 10"* carcinogenic
risk and a cumulative noncarcinogenic hazard
index less than or equal to 1. Ground water will
be treated if it exceeds action levels which have
been established as a cumulative cancer risk of
less than 10"* and a cumulative noncarcinogenic
hazard index less than or equal to 1.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls include site access and deed restrictions.
KEYWORDS: ACL; Air Stripping, ARAR
Waiver, Arseniq Benzene; Capping; Carbon
Adsorption; Carcinogenic Compounds; Direct
Contact; Excavation; Ground Water; Ground
Water Monitoring; Inorganics; Institutional
Controls; Landfill Closure; Leachate
Collection/Treatment; MCLs; Metals; O&M;
Offsite Disposal; Onsite Containment; Onsite
Discharge; Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment;
Organics; PAHs; Pesticides; Phenols; RCRA; Safe
Drinking Water Act; Sediment; Slurry Wall; Soil;
State Standards/Regulations; Treatment
Technology; VOCs.
GALESBURG/KOPPERS, IL
First Remedial Action - Final
June 30, 1989
The Galesburg/Koppers site is a 105-acre area
located approximately two miles south of the city
of Galesburg in Knox County, Illinois. The land
surrounding the site is sparsely populated with
the Burlington Northern Railroad yard to the
north, a landfill to the east, and four residences
and a lumber yard to the south and west.
Farmland abuts these areas. Burlington Northern
Railroad Company operated the site as a railroad
tie treating plant from 1907 to December 1966.
In 1966 the Koppers Company, Inc. leased the
production plant from Burlington Northern and
resumed operation of the facility. Treatment
operations consisted of pressure treatment of the
railroad ties using a mixture of creosote and coal
tar or creosote and fuel oil. From 1971 to 1976
pentachlorophenol (PCP) was used in the
treatment process. Key contaminated areas at the
site include a slurry pond, a northern and
southern creosote lagoon, a PCP-contaminated
lagoon, a waste pile storage area, two backfilled
drainage ditches, and two former spray wastewater
fields. Contamination has been found in soil,
ground water, surface water, and on- and offsite
sediment. This ROD addresses all contaminated
97
-------
media. These actions, in combination with
remedial actions at the Steagall Landfill site, are
intended to eliminate offsite surface water and
sediment contamination as well. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil and
ground water are organics including PCP, phenols,
and PAHs.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
excavation and onsite consolidation of
approximately 15,200 cubic yards of contaminated
soil with onsite biological treatment of soil and
implementation of a biological monitoring
program; construction of shallow ground water
interceptor trenches and deep pumping wells with
pumping and onsite pretreatment of shallow and
deep ground water using an existing wastewater
treatment system to achieve cleanup objectives,
discharging treated ground water to a POTW for
final treatment or onsite treatment should the
POTW pretreatment standards not be achieved;
ground water monitoring; and implemention of
site access and land use restrictions. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is 54,286,844, which includes an estimated
annual O&M cost of 5170,012.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
No chemical-specific cleanup goals were
established for soil at the site. The soil will be
excavated six inches beyond visible contamination.
Samples will be taken after excavation to assess
the mitigative efforts and to confirm remediation
to health-based levels. Additionally, soil will be
treated to background toxicity levels. Cleanup
goals for ground water were based on a 10"*
excess carcinogenic risk goal.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Site access and
land use restrictions will be implemented for the
area of contamination in accordance with the
anticipated consent decree.
KEYWORDS: Aeration; ARAR Waiver;
Biodegradation/Land Application; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Water Act; Dioxin; Direct
Contact; Excavation; Ground Water; Ground
Water Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Hybrid/Alternate Closure (not under RCRA);
O&M; Ofisite Discharge; Onsite Treatment;
Organics; PAHs; Phenols; Plume Management;
Public Exposure; Publicly Owned Treatment
Works (POTW); RCRA; Soil; State Guidance;
Treatability Studies; Treatment Technology.
HEDBLUM INDUSTRIES, MI
First Remedial Action - Final
September 29, 1989
The Hedblum Industries site, an automotive parts
manufacturing plant, is approximately one mile
southwest of the town of Oscoda, in AuSable
Township, losco County, Michigan. In addition
to the plant, the site consists of a ten-acre
industrial park, a wetland area, and residences
including the AuSable Heights subdivision.
Ground water flows beneath the plant and
subdivision and discharges via a bayou into the
AuSable River. Between 1968 and 1972 the
previous plant operators discharged cooling water,
rinse water, and approximately 4,000 gallons of
waste TCE onto the ground. In 1973 VOCs were
detected in residential wells in the AuSable
subdivision. Contaminated wells were replaced
with deeper wells which by 1977 also showed
traces of contamination. Subsequently, the
Oscoda Township Municipal Supply System was
extended to residents through the installation of
a new water main. An underground storage tank
containing TCE, TCA, and PCE was removed
from the site in 1980. The primary contaminants
of concern affecting the ground water are VOCs
including benzene, toluene, xylenes, TCE, and
PCE; and metals including lead.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
ground water pumping and treatment using
activated carbon adsorption with discharge to the
bayou; and ground water and soil monitoring.
The estimated present worth cost for this
remedial action is $1,379,000, which includes an
annual O&M cost of $264,000 over 4 to 5 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water will meet SDWA MCLs. Target
cleanup levels for ground water include benzene
5 ug/1, TCE 5 ug/I, and lead 50 ug/1.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS; Benzene; Carbon Adsorption
(GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Water
98
-------
Act; Direct Contact; Drinking Water
Contaminants; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment; Lead;
MCLs; Metals; Offsite Discharge; Onsite
Treatment; O&M; PCE; Plume Management; Safe
Drinking Water Act; State Permit; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Toluene; VOCs;
Water Quality Criteria; Wetlands; Xylenes.
INDUSTRIAL EXCESS LANDFILL, OH
Second Remedial Action - Final
July 17, 1989
The 30-acre Industrial Excess Landfill site is in
Uniontown, Stark County, Ohio. Several hundred
residences are within a half mile of the site, and
all residences and businesses in the Uniontown
area rely on ground water from private well
supplies. Surface water at the site flows to
Metzger Ditch which is located along the eastern
border of the site. The site was operated as a
mixed industrial and residential landfill from 1966
until 1980. Large amounts of fly ash and liquid
wastes including latex and spent organic solvents
were disposed of in the landfill between 1968 and
1972. To prevent the spread of contaminants
associated with these wastes, several emergency
actions have been undertaken. In 1986 an active
methane extraction system was installed to
prevent the offsite migration of explosive levels of
methane gas. In April 1987 EPA installed air
strippers in eight residences and two businesses
due to the presence of low levels of volatile
organic compounds. In September 1987 EPA
signed a ROD to provide an alternate water
supply to 100 homes west of the site to ensure
that the community received safe drinking water
while the final remedial action for the site was
implemented. This ROD represents the final
remedial action for the site and addresses the
source area, gases generated within the source
area, and contaminated ground water.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
installing a multilayer RCRA cap over the site to
prevent surface water infiltration; expanding the
existing methane venting system to accommodate
the potential increase of landfill gas due to the
cap; extracting and treating approximately 256
million gallons of contaminated ground water by
air stripping, carbon adsorption, and flocculation/
sedimentation/filtration to achieve compliance
with Clean Water Act NPDES discharge criteria
for surface water discharge; continuing the
pumping of ground water to maintain a lowered
water table and protect ground water from
additional contamination by the landfill; treating
surface water from ponds at the site, if necessary;
and dredging contaminated sediment from the
ponds and ditch and incorporating them under
the cap; multimedia monitoring; and institutional
controls restricting future use of the site. The
estimated present worth cost for this selected
remedial action is $18,548,000, which includes an
estimated annual O&M cost of $440,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The selected remedy will ensure that landfill gas
concentrations beyond the site boundary will not
exceed 5 percent methane. Ground water cleanup
is based on a 10"* excess cancer level and will be
treated to achieve MCLs in the aquifer and
discharged in compliance with Clean Water Act
NPDES requirements. Specific ground water
goals include benzene 5 ug/1 and vinyl chloride 2
ug/1. Permit limits are established in accordance
with State EPA Aquatic Life Quality Criteria for
discharge to Metzger Ditch. Acute and chronic
limits for the ditch discharge were provided in the
ROD.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls will be imposed to restrict future use of
the site property. Future construction or public
use of the land will be prohibited.
KEYWORDS: Air, Air Monitoring; Air
Stripping; Benzene; Capping; Carbon Adsorption;
Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act; Dredging;
Drinking Water Contaminants; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; Institutional Controls; Landfill
Closure; MCLs; Metals; Offsite Discharge; Onsite
Treatment; O&M; Organics; PAHs; PCE; Plume
Management; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act;
Sediment; Soil; State Standards/Regulations;
Surface Water Collection/Diversion; Surface
Water Monitoring; Surface Water Treatment;
VOCs; Water Quality Criteria.
99
-------
IONIA CTIY LANDFILL, MI
First Remedial Action
September 29, 1989
The Ionia City Landfill site is a 20-acre
municipally owned landfill in the southeast corner
of Ionia, Michigan. The site is bordered by the
Grand River to the south, a tributary to the
Grand River to the east, and a light
commercial/residential area to the north. The
site lies within the 100-year floodplain of the
Grand River. The landfill was operated from the
1950s until about 1969, during which time
industrial, commercial, and municipal wastes were
disposed of at the site, including drummed liquids
and solids from industrial sources. Drums of
ignitable liquid wastes were reportedly burned
until 1965. A State investigation in 1981 revealed
exposed drums containing paint wastes, thinners,
and industrial solvents as well as elevated levels
of metals. Furthermore VOC- and
metal-contaminated ground water was detected.
EPA investigations began in 1982 and revealed
VOC contamination in the Grand River tributary
surface water. Follow-up investigations by EPA
led to an immediate removal action in 1984-85 by
the city, under an administrative order, which
included fencing a portion of the site, removing
and disposing of exposed drums, covering
depressed areas, and stabilizing areas of erosion.
Current site risks result from subsurface wastes
(or point source) from a 1/4 acre area in the
northern section of the landfill. The estimated
total waste volume is 5,000 cubic yards consisting
of badly deteriorated buried drums and associated
•wastes, and contaminated soil. In addition there
is a contaminant plume in an underlying shallow
aquifer. The first operable unit addresses the
point source area. A second operable unit
addressing ground water has been deferred until
the completion of the ground water monitoring
plan. The primary contaminants of concern
affecting the soil and debris are VOCs including
vinyl chloride and methyl chloride; other organics;
and metals including chromium.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
in-situ vitrification of the defined point source
area and an adjacent margin of safety zone,
including an off-gas collection and treatment
system; access restrictions; ground water
monitoring; institutional controls to restrict site
use; and upgrading the landfill cover and
repairing the side slopes followed by revegetation.
The estimated present worth cost for this
remedial action is $3,630,525, which includes an
estimated annual O&M cost of $112,750 for year
1 and $51,000 for years 2-10. If a pilot test
indicates that the selected remedy is inadequate,
a contingency alternative of partial excavation
with onsite incineration will be implemented.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Target cleanup levels for the soil-refuse matrix to
determine the extent of excavation will not be
established; instead, the extent of excavation will
be based on the extent of buried drums and
additional sampling.
INSTTTUTIONAL CONTROLS:
restrictions will be implemented.
Site use
KEYWORDS: Carcinogenic Compounds;
Chromium; Clean Air Act; Closure Requirements;
Debris; Contingency Remedy; Direct Contact;
Excavation; Floodplain; Ground Water
Monitoring; Institutional Controls; Metals;
Municipally Owned Site; O&M; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; RCRA; Soil; Solvents; State
Standards/Regulations; Treatability Studies;
Treatment Technology; VOCs.
KYSOR INDUSTRIAL, MI
First Remedial Action - Final
September 29, 1989
The Kysor Industrial site is a large truck parts
manufacturing plant in the Cadillac industrial
park in the city of Cadillac, Wexford County,
Michigan. Approximately 40 industries operate
in the 1-square-mile industrial park including
Northernaire, another Superfund site. The
Northernaire site will be addressed by the ground
water remediation portion of this action as well.
There are several private residences including a
trailer park within the industrial park, and
another residential neighborhood lies adjacent to
the northern boundary of the park. The city of
Cadillac water supply well field is located near
the center of the park, and ground water beneath
the site generally flows towards the city wells.
The Clam River flows through the southeast
portion of the site draining runoff from the site.
100
-------
The Kysor facility commonly uses solvent cleaners
and degreasers; past disposal practices included
dumping barrels of spent solvent directly on the
soil behind the plant. Kysor excavated
approximately 700 cubic yards of soil in 1981
after contaminants were discovered in ground
water samples. Ground water contamination has
since been detected throughout the shallow and
intermediate aquifers underlying the park. At
present the deep aquifer (in which the Cadillac
city well field is located) is not affected by this
contamination. The remaining soil contamination
is relatively localized and is from 6 to 25 feet in
depth. The primary contaminants of concern
affecting the soil and ground water are VOCs
including toluene, TCE, PCE, and xylenes; and
metals including chromium.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
a two-stage ground water pumping and treatment
system using carbon adsorption for the removal of
chromium and air stripping with vapor-phase
carbon adsorption for the removal of VOCs and
discharge to the Clam River; in- situ soil vacuum
extraction with air pollution control equipment;
ground water monitoring; and institutional
controls including site access and ground water
and land use restrictions. The estimated present
worth cost for this remedial action is $16,000,000,
which includes present worth O&M costs of
$5,000,000 over 60 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water will meet or exceed State and
SDWA MCL standards. Target cleanup levels
for ground water include xylene 440 ug/1, toluene
40 ug/1, PCE 1 ug/1, TCE 5 ug/1, and chromium
(hexavalent) 50 ug/1. Soil will meet State, RCRA,
and CAA standards. Target cleanup levels for
soil include xylene 141 mg/kg, toluene 724 mg/kg,
and TCE 0.07 mg/kg.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls will be established including site access
and ground water and land use restrictions.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Carbon Adsorption;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Chromium; Clean Air
Act; Clean Water Act; Drinking Water
Contaminants; Direct Contact; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; Institutional Controls; MCLs; Metals;
Offsite Discharge; O&M; Onsite Treatment; PCE;
RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil; State
Permit; State Standards/Regulations; TCE;
Toluene; Treatment Technology; Vacuum
Extraction; VOCs; Water Quality Criteria;
Xylenes.
LASHN/POPLAR OIL, OH
Third Remedial Action - Final
June 29, 1989
The 9-acre Laskin/Poplar Oil site is in Jefferson
Township, Ashtabula County, Ohio. Included on
the site are: a residence, a greenhouse complex, a
boiler house/garage containing 4 boilers, a
smokestack, 4 oil storage pits, 1 underground and
32 above ground oil storage tanks, a retention
pond, a freshwater pond, and miscellaneous small
buildings. In the 1960s storage pits and tanks
were installed to store waste oil for the boilers
that heated the greenhouses. The Poplar Oil
Company continued to accept the waste oil
throughout the 1960s and 1970s. In 1981 EPA
found PCBs in onsite ground water and soil
which resulted in several emergency actions that
included draining and regrading 2 retention
ponds, diverting surface runoff to other retention
ponds, removing offsite and incinerating 302,000
gallons of waste oil, treating and discharging
offsite 430,000 gallons of contaminated surface
water, and solidifying 205,000 gallons of sludge.
From 1985 to 1986 the Poplar Oil Company
removed an additional 250,000 gallons of waste
oil and wastewater in response to an
administrative order. Two additional orders were
issued ordering workplan development and
incineration of materials in the pits, tanks, and
heavily contaminated soil. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil, onsite
structures, and debris are organics including
PCBs, PAHs, pesticides, and dioxin; and metals
including lead.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
draining onsite freshwater and retention ponds
with offsite discharge and refilling; thermally
treating contaminated soil, ash, and debris from
the boiler house area with onsite disposal of ash
if the ash can be delisted, otherwise offsite
disposal in a RCRA landfill; demolishing and
thermally treating or decontaminating
101
-------
dioxin-contaminated structures; constructing an
up-gradient ground water diversion trench;
installing a multi-layer cap over contaminated soil
exceeding a 10"* excess cancer-risk level;
monitoring surface and ground water; and
imposing access and land use restrictions. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $11,000,000, which includes present
worth O&M costs of $1,000,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
No specific cleanup goals were provided; however,
remediation goals will prevent exposure to
contaminated soil and debris exceeding a 10"*
cancer-risk level or a total hazard index greater
than 1.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Land use and
access restrictions will be implemented to prohibit
site use, land development, and ground water
extraction.
KEYWORDS; Capping; Clean Air Act; Clean
Water Act; Debris; Decontamination; Dioxin;
Direct Contact; Filling; Floodplain; Ground
Water; Ground Water Monitoring; Incineration/
Thermal Destruction; Institutional Controls;
Landfill Closure; Lead; Metals; Offsite Discharge;
Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment; Organics;
PAHs, PCBs; Pesticides; RCRA; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water; Surface
Water Monitoring; Treatment Technology.
MIDCOLIN
First Remedial Action - Final
June 30, 1989
The MDDCO I site is a four-acre, abandoned
industrial waste recycling, storage, and disposal
facility in Gary, Indiana. The surrounding area
is partially rural, including wetlands. Residential
neighborhoods lie to the west, south, and east,
with some residents living as close as 900 feet
from the site. Twelve drinking water wells have
been identified within approximately one mile of
the site. The Calumet Aquifer, one of the two
major aquifers underlying the site and providing
water to these wells, is highly susceptible to
contamination from surface sources. Recycling,
storing, and disposing of industrial wastes began
at the site sometime before June 1973. Within a
three-year period, the site owners accepted and
stockpiled approximately 6,000-7,000 55-gallon
drums containing bulk liquid waste, and 4 bulk
tanks, each 4,000-10,000 gallons. The facility
closed in December 1976 after a fire burned
approximately 14,000 drums of chemical waste.
Operations resumed in October 1977 under new
ownership. By February 1979 the new owners
abandoned the facility, leaving thousands of drums
and waste chemicals unattended. By January 1980
an estimated 14,000 drums were still stockpiled
onsite. In June 1981 severe flooding caused water
in the area to drain west into a neighboring city;
contact with the flood water reportedly resulted in
skin burns. In 1982 EPA initiated a surface
removal action which included removing extensive
surface wastes, an underground tank, and the top
one foot of contaminated soil. Because these
activities did not address the contaminated
subsurface soil, sediment, and ground water, EPA
has initiated this first remedial action to address
the above-referenced contaminated media. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
soil, sediment, and ground water are VOCs
including benzene, toluene, and TCE; other
organics including PCBs, phenols, and PAHs; and
metals including chromium and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
soil vapor extraction followed by treatment of
12,400 cubic yards of contaminated soil and
subsurface materials using solidification/
stabilization and onsite disposal; excavation and
onsite solidification/stabilization of approximately
1,200 cubic yards of contaminated sediment in
surrounding wetlands; covering the site in
accordance with RCRA landfill closure
requirements; ground water pumping and deep
well injection in a Class I well if EPA grants a
petition to allow land disposal of waste prohibited
under RCRA; if a petition is not approved,
ground water will be treated using air stripping
and a liquid-phase granular activated carbon
polish system to meet EPA requirements (LDR
treatment standards), followed by deep well
injection or reinjection into the aquifer; ground
water monitoring; and implementation of deed
and access restrictions. The estimated present
worth cost for this remedial action is $13,989,000,
which includes annual O&M costs of $525,000, if
102
-------
ground water is treated; or $10,728,000, which
includes annual O&M costs of $188,000, if ground
water is not treated.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Cleanup action levels were provided for soil and
ground water. Soil and sediment will be treated
if they exceed any of the following risk-based
levels: cumulative lifetime carcinogenic risk equal
to 10"*; cumulative chronic noncarcinogenic index
equal to 1.0; or subchronic risk index equal to
1.0. Ground water will be pumped and treated if
it exceeds any of the following risk-based levels:
cumulative lifetime cancer risk equal to 10~5;
cumulative noncarcinogenic index equal to 1.0;
subchronic risk equal to 1.0; primary MCLs; or
chronic AWQC (for aquatic wildlife) multiplied
by a dilution factor of 3,9. If only one
constituent poses a cancer risk equal to or greater
than 10'5, the MCL, if promulgated, will be the
cleanup action level. Chemical-specific goals were
not provided for soil, sediment, or ground water.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls will include site access and deed
restrictions.
KEYWORDS: Benzene; Capping; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Chromium; Clean Air Act; Direct
Contact; Excavation; Ground Water; Ground
Water Monitoring; Institutional Controls; Landfill
Closure; Lead; MCLs; Metals; O&M; Offsite
Disposal; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Disposal;
Onsite Treatment; Organics; PAHs; PCBs;
Pesticides; Phenols; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water
Act; Sediment; Soil; Solidification/Stabilization;
State Permit; State Standards/Regulations; TCE;
Toluene; Toxic Substances Control Act;
Treatability Studies; Treatment Technology;
VOCs; Wetlands; Xylenes.
MIDCO IL IN
First Remedial Action - Final
June 30, 1989
The MIDCO II site is a seven-acre storage and
disposal facility in Gary, Indiana. The
surrounding area is predominantly used for
industrial purposes, and includes 34 other
potential hazardous waste sites. The underlying
aquifer is highly susceptible to contamination
from surface sources because of the high water
table; however, in the vicinity of the site, the
aquifer is used primarily for non-drinking water
purposes. The same operator as at another
Superfund site, MIDCO I, began waste
operations, including drum storage at MIDCO II
during the summer of 1976. Following a major
fire at the MIDCO I site in January 1977,
MIDCO transferred the operations from the
MIDCO I site to the MIDCO II site. Operations
included temporarily storing bulk liquid and drum
wastes; neutralizing acids and caustics; and
disposing of wastes by dumping wastes into onsite
pits, which allowed wastes to percolate into the
ground water. One of these pits, the filter pit,
had an overflow pipe leading into a ditch, which
drained into the nearby Grand Calument River.
By April 1977 approximately 12,000 to 15,000
55-gallon drums of waste materials were stored
onsite. Additionally, an estimated ten badly
deteriorated and leaking tanks were holding
wastes including oils, oil sludges, chlorinated
solvents, paint solvents, paint sludges, acids, and
spent cyanides. In August 1977 a fire at the site
destroyed 50,000 to 60,000 drums. Although most
drums were badly damaged, a substantial number
of drums, including 75 to 100 drums containing
cyanide, survived the fire. EPA conducted a
preliminary investigation resulting in the
installation of a 10-foot high fence around the
site. In 1984 and 1985 EPA conducted emergency
removal activities including repairing and
extending the site fence; removing most of the
remaining drums, tanks, and debris from the site's
surface; and removing the sludge pits and filter
pit contents. The resulting PCB-contaminated
soil pile was removed and disposed of in an
offsite hazardous waste landfill in early 1986, and
most of the cyanide-contaminated pile was also
removed. Removal activities ended in January
1986. The primary contaminants of concern
currently affecting the soil, sediment, and ground
water are VOCs including benzene, toluene, TCE,
and xylenes; other organics including PCBs; and
metals including arsenic, chromium, and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
excavation and treatment of 35,000 cubic yards of
contaminated soil and waste materials using
solidification/stabilization followed by onsite
disposal; excavation and onsite
103
-------
solidification/stabilization of 500 cubic yards of
contaminated sediment; covering the site in
accordance with RCRA landfill closure
requirements; ground water pumping and deep
well injection in a Class I well if EPA grants a
petition to allow land disposal of waste prohibited
under RCRA; if a petition is not approved,
ground water will be treated using air stripping
and a liquid phase granular activated carbon
polish system to meet EPA requirements (LDR
treatment standards), followed by deep well
injection or reinjection into the aquifer; ground
water monitoring; and implementing deed and
access restrictions. The ground water treatment
and underground injection portions of the
remedial action may be combined with the
remedial action for MIDCO I. The estimated
present worth cost for the remedial action is
$18,596,400, which includes annual O&M costs of
$733,000, if ground water is treated; or
$14,419,000, which includes annual O&M costs of
$301,000, if ground water is not treated.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Cleanup action levels were provided for soil,
sediment, and ground water. Soil and sediment
will be treated if they exceed any of the following
risk-based levels: cumulative lifetime carcinogenic
risk equal to 10'5; cumulative chronic
noncarcinogenic index equal to 1.0; or subchronic
risk index equal to 1.0. Ground water will be
pumped and treated if it exceeds any of the
following risk-based levels: cumulative lifetime
carcinogenic risk equal to 10"5; cumulative
noncarcinogenic index equal to 1.0; subchronic
risk equal to 1.0; primary MCLs; or chronic
AWQC for protection of aquatic life multiplied
by a factor of 3.6. If only one constituent poses
a cancer risk equal to or greater than 10's, the
MCL, if promulgated, will be the cleanup action
level. Chemical-specific goals were not provided
for soil, sediment, or ground water.
INSnTUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls will include site access and deed
restrictions.
KEYWORDS; Arsenic; Benzene; Capping,
Carcinogenic Compounds; Chromium; Clean
Water Act; Excavation; Ground Water; Ground
Water Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Institutional Controls; Landfill Closure; Lead;
MCLs; Metals; O&M; Onsite Discharge; Onsite
Disposal; Onsite Treatment; Organics; PCBs;
RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act; Sediment; Soil;
Solidification/Stabilization; RCRA; TCE; Toluene;
Treatment Technology; VOCs; Wetlands; Xylenes.
MIAMI COUNTY INCINERATOR, OH
First Remedial Action - Final
June 30, 1989
The Miami County Incinerator site is in Concord
Township, Ohio. The 65-acre site is
approximately 1,500 feet west of the Great Miami
River; the Eldean Tributory of the river runs
across the northwest corner of the site. The site
consists of the incinerator building and adjacent
property, including a former scrubber wastewater
lagoon, an ash disposal pit, an ash pile, a liquid
disposal area, and trench and fill landfill areas
north and south of the Eldean Tributory.
Operations began in 1968, when large quantities
of spent solvents, oils, and drummed and bulk
industrial sludges were accepted for disposal. The
facility generated scrubber wastewater and ash
quench water, which were disposed of in the
wastewater lagoon. Incinerator fly ash and
bottom ash, non-combustible materials, and
unburned refuse were disposed of in a landfill
north of the tributary, and an estimated 104,000
to 150,000 barrel-equivalents of liquid waste were
dumped or buried onsite. After closure of the
facility in 1983, the Ohio EPA found detectable
levels of chlorinated hydrocarbons in drinking
water wells near the site. Three residences, the
Miami County Highway Garage, and the
incinerator facility were supplied with alternate
water supplies in 1986. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil and
ground water are VOCs including PCE, toluene,
and TCE; other organics including PCBs, PAHs,
dioxin, and pesticides; and metals including lead.
The selected remedial actions for this site are
specific to each area of contamination and include
excavation and onsite consolidation of ash wastes
and contaminated soil onto the landfills with
capping of landfills and previously excavated
areas; pumping and treatment of ground water
with discharge to POTW; vapor/vacuum
extraction of liquid disposal area using carbon
filters; continued testing of soil, ash, and tributary
104
-------
sediment; and provision of an alternate water
supply for area residents and businesses. The
estimated present worth for this remedial action
is $19,400,000, which includes an estimated O&M
cost of $4,666,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Specific cleanup levels have not been established
at this time; however, they will be based on
MCLs, a hazard index of 1, a 10~5 cancer-risk level
at the waste boundary (i.e., edge of cup), and a
10"* cancer-risk level at the nearest receptor.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed and land
use restrictions will be implemented to prevent
any future use of ground water.
KEYWORDS: Alternate Water Supply; Capping;
Carbon Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act;
Dioxin; Direct Contact; Drinking Water
Contaminants; Excavation; Filling; Floodplain;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Institutional Controls;
Landfill Closure; Lead; MCLs; Metals; O&M;
Offsite Discharge; Offcite Treatment; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; PAHs; PCBs; PCE;
Pesticides; Plume Management; Public Exposure;
Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW);
RCRA; Soil; State Standards/Regulations; TCE;
Toluene; Treatment Technology; Vacuum
Extraction; VOCs; Volatilization/Soil Aeration.
NEW BRIGHTON/ARDEN HILLS, MN
Fourth Remedial Action (Amendment)
August 11, 1989
The New Brighton/Arden Hills site is an area of
organic solvent contamination in ground water
northwest of Minneapolis, Minnesota. The site
includes the cities of New Brighton, Arden Hills,
and St. Anthony as well as the Twin Cities Army
Ammunition plant. This ROD amends a June
1986 ROD calling for the installation of a new
well to provide part of the drinking water supply
to New Brighton. Because of major changes in
site conditions, EPA has concluded that a new
well is no longer necessary to protect human
health in New Brighton. Originally it was
anticipated that low contamination levels in Well
#7 (one of nine municipal wells) could not be
assured and that a replacement well in a deeper
aquifer was needed to provide an alternate supply
of water. However, further data from Well #7
indicate contamination is not increasing.
Moreover, a large water supply will be provided
by the U.S. Army to New Brighton as part of a
litigation settlement, and a system has been
installed by the U.S. Army to prevent further
contamination from the suspected sources.
Therefore, EPA believes it is no longer necessary
or cost effective to complete the project. There
are no contaminants of concern affecting the
ground water associated with Well #7.
The selected remedial action for this ROD
amendment is no further action for the Well #7
operable unit and ceasing the installation of a
ground water supply well remedy selected in a
June 1986 ROD.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Because the objectives of the operable unit
affected was to provide an alternate water supply,
rather than cleanup of the site, cleanup standards
are not applicable for the amendment.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Municipally Owned Site; ROD
Amendment.
NEW BRIGHTON/ARDEN HILLS (TCAAP), MN
Seventh Remedial Action
July 19, 1989
The New Brighton/Arden Hills site, also known
as the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant
(TCAAP) site, is in New Brighton, Minnesota.
Land use bordering the four square-mile site is
largely residential. Past disposal of ammunition
manufacturing wastes onsite resulted in
contamination of ground water beneath and
downgradient of the site. A total of 14 waste
disposal locations have been identified and
assigned as Sites A through K. During remedial
investigations at Site D, soil was discovered to be
contaminated with PCBs and other organic and
metal contaminants. A soil gas extraction system
was implemented to remove the source of volatile
organic contamination and reduce the potential of
migration to ground water. In implementing the
105
-------
soil gas extraction system, PCB- contaminated soil
was removed, stockpiled near Site D, and sealed
with a plastic liner material. This interim remedy
addresses the treatment and disposal of
contaminated soil that is stockpiled near Site D.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the soil are VOCs including TCE and PCE; other
organics including PCBs; and metals including
arsenic and lead.
The selected remedial action for the site includes
onsite treatment of approximately 1,400 cubic
yards of stockpiled soil using mobile infrared
thermal treatment technology; analysis of treated
soil to ensure PCB treatment goal is met,
followed by placement of treated soil in an area
near Site D; discharge of treated scrubber
wastewater to the TCAAP sanitary sewer system
and ultimately to a POTW; decontamination and
removal of equipment used in the treatment
process; and air monitoring during soil treatment.
The estimated total cost for the selected remedy
is $1,200,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The treatment goal for soil is PCBs 2 mg/kg and
is consistent with Toxic Substances Control Act
treatment levels.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS; Air Monitoring; Arsenic; Clean
Air Act; Clean Water Act; Decontamination;
Direct Contact; Incineration/Thermal Destruction;
Interim Remedy; Lead; Metals; Offsite Discharge;
Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment; Organics;
PCBs; PCE; Publicly Owned Treatment Works
(POTW); RCRA; Soil; State Permit; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water Monitoring;
TCE; Toxic Substances Control Act; Treatment
Technology, VOCs.
NINTH AVENUE DUMP, IN
Second Remedial Action - Final
June 30, 1989
The Ninth Avenue Dump is a 17-acre, inactive
chemical and industrial waste disposal site in
Gary, Indiana. There is industrial, commerical,
and residential development in the surrounding
area. There are approximately 60 industrial and
residential water supply wells within 1 mile of the
site. Interconnecting ponds and wetlands areas
border the waste disposal areas into the north,
west, and south. The wetlands areas to the east
and to the south of the site are relatively
undisturbed. Hazardous waste disposal occurred
at the site from the early to mid-1970s, with some
filling associated with cleanup activities continuing
until 1980. Industrial, construction, demolition,
and chemical wastes were accepted at the site.
Specific industrial wastes which were accepted at
the site include oil, paint, solvents and sludges,
resins, and flammable, caustic, and
arsenic-contaminated materials. A State
inspection in 1975 revealed that there were
approximately 10,000 55-gallon drums at the site.
Additionally, the State estimated that 500,000
gallons of liquid industrial waste were dumped,
and 1,000 drums were buried onsite and in
contact with ground water. As a result of 1975
state orders and 1980 EPA orders to initiate
surface cleanup, the site operator removed drums,
tank cars, and some contaminated soil from the
site's surface. The first ROD, signed in
September 1988, addressed remediation of an oil
layer floating on the ground water surface and
will include construction of a slurry wall around
the contaminated portion of the site and
excavation and onsite storage of contaminated
soil. This second and final remedial action
addresses the remaining threats to the site which
include contaminated soil, sediment, fill material,
ground water (generally onsite), and oil collected
during the first operable unit. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil,
sediment, fill material, and ground water are
VOCs including benzene, TCE, and toluene; other
organics including PAHs and PCBs; and metals
including lead.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
excavating approximately 36,000 cubic yards of the
most severely oil-contaminated waste and fill
materials from the area inside the slurry wall,
onsite thermal treatment of excavated waste, fill,
and previously extracted oil, followed by filling
the excavated area with incinerator and ground
water treatment process residues, discarded drums,
contaminated sediment removed from on- and
offsite ponds, and trench spoils; covering the area
contained by the slurry wall with a RCRA cap;
pumping and treatment of ground water inside
106
-------
the slurry wall with reinjection of most of the
ground water within the slurry wall to promote
soil flushing; dismantling, decontaminating, and
removing the oil storage unit constructed under
the first operable unit; continued long-term
ground water monitoring; air monitoring during
remedial activities; and implementing institutional
controls to protect the site and restrict ground
water use. The estimated present worth cost for
this remedial action is $22,209,000 which includes
an annual O&M cost of $489,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil excavation is not designed to clean the area
to meet health-based cleanup levels but rather to
remove the most highly contaminated fill material
and to ensure the long-term effectiveness of the
containment and ground water components of the
remedy. Chemical-specific treatment standards for
soil were not provided. Target cleanup levels for
ground water are based on MCLs or a 10"5
cumulative carcinogenic risk, whichever is more
stringent, for carcinogens; and MCLs, MCLGs,
or a hazard index of 1, whichever is more
stringent, for noncarcinogens.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed and
access restrictions will be implemented to prohibit
use of ground water under the site and to protect
the cap.
KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; Benzene;
Capping; Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Water
Act; Closure Requirements; Debris;
Decontamination; Direct Contact; Dredging;
Excavation; Filling; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Incineration/Thermal Destruction; Institutional
Controls; Landfill Closure; Lead; MCLs; MCLGs;
Metals; O&M; Offeite Disposal; Oils; Onsite
Discharge; Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment;
Organics; PAHs; PCBs; RCRA; Safe Drinking
Water Act; Sediment; Soil; Soil Washing/Flushing;
State Standards/Regulations; TCE; Toluene;
Treatability Studies; Treatment Technology, Toxic
Substances Control Act; VOCs; Water Quality
Criteria; Wetlands.
NORTHERNAIRE PLATING, MI
Second Remedial Action - Final
September 29, 1989
The Northernaire Plating site is a former
electroplating facility in the Cadillac industrial
park in the city of Cadillac, Wexford County,
Michigan. Approximately 40 industries operate
in the 1-square mile industrial park including
Kysor Industrial, another Superfund site. The
Kysor Industrial site will be addressed by this
action as well. There are several private
residences including a trailer park within the
industrial park, and another residential
neighborhood lies adjacent to the northern
boundary of the park. The city of Cadillac water
supply well field is located near the center of the
park, and ground water beneath the site generally
flows towards the city wells. The Clam River
flows through the southeast portion of the site
draining runoff from the site. The Northernaire
Plating facility provided custom chromium and
nickel plating finishes to automobile and other
metal parts. Improper waste handling and faulty
sewer systems are believed to be responsible for
releasing toxic compounds (including hexavalent
chromium, chromium, and cyanide) to the soil
which have subsequently leached from the soil to
the ground water. A 1985 ROD addressed the
soil contamination and included excavation and
offsite disposal of contaminated soil and sewer
sediment. Ground water contamination has since
been detected throughout the shallow and
intermediate aquifers underlying the park. At
present the deep aquifer (in which the Cadillac
city well field is located) is not affected by this
contamination. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the ground water are VOCs
including toluene, TCE, PCE, and xylene; and
metals including chromium.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
a two-stage ground water pumping and treatment
system using carbon adsorption for the removal of
chromium and air stripping with vapor-phase
carbon adsorption for the removal of VOCs and
discharge to the Clam River; ground water
monitoring; and institutional controls including
site access and ground water and land use
restrictions. The estimated present worth cost for
107
-------
this remedial action is $16,000,000, which includes
present worth O&M costs of $5,000,000 over 60
years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water will meet or exceed State and
SDWA MCL standards. Target cleanup levels
for ground water include xylene 440 ug/1, toluene
40 ug/1, PCE 1 ug/1, TCE 5 ug/1, and chromium
(hexavalent) 50 ug/1.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls will be established including site access
and ground water and land use restrictions.
KEYWORDS; Air Stripping; Carbon Adsorption;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Chromium; Clean Air
Act; Clean Water Act; Drinking Water
Contaminants; Direct Contact; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; MCLs; Metals; Offsite Discharge;
O&M; Onsite Treatment; PCE; Plume
Management; Public Health Advisory; RCRA;
Safe Drinking Water Act; State Permit; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Toluene; VOCs;
Water Quality Criteria; Xylenes.
OTT/STORY/CORDOVA CHEMICAL, MI
First Remedial Action
September 29, 1989
The Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical site is in Dalton
Township, Muskegon County, Michigan.
Beginning in 1957, various specialty organic
chemical manufacturers operated at the site,
producing intermediate items used in making
Pharmaceuticals, dyestuffs, and agricultural
chemicals. Soil and water contamination was
noted as early as the 1960s, probably resulting
from discharge of production vessel clean out
wastes and wastewaters to onsite unlined lagoons,
and drums of waste that were accumulated onsite.
In 1977 several thousand cubic yards of lagoon
sludge and several thousand drums were removed
by the State, and in 1982 an alternate water
supply was provided to residents in the vicinity of
the site. Subsequent investigations detected
significant degradation of Little Bear Creek and
its unnamed tributary, which flow past the site to
the east, as a result of contaminated ground
water. Due to the complexity of the site the
cleanup will be organized into two distinct
operable units. This first operable unit addresses
the interception of contaminated ground water
entering the Little Bear Creek system. The
second operable unit will address contaminated
soil, possible ground water remediation, source
control, and air and water monitoring. The
primary chemicals of concern affecting the ground
water and surface water are VOCs including
benzene, PCE, TCE, toluene, vinyl chloride, and
xylene; other organics including PCBs and
pesticides; and metals including arsenic.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
pumping and treatment of ground water that
would otherwise enter the Little Bear Creek
system using UV-oxidation, carbon adsorption,
biological treatment (activated sludge), and
filtration with discharge to surface water; and
environmental monitoring. The estimated present
worth cost for this remedial action is $11,751,000,
which includes estimated annual O&M costs of
$1,500,000 to $1,600,000 for years 1-5.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Effluent quality and stream discharge will meet
State NPDES levels which are dependent on final
discharge point. ARARs pertaining to ground
water restoration will be addressed in a
subsequent overall ground water operable unit.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air; Arsenic; Benzene; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Clean Water Act; Direct Contact; Floodplain;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; Metals; MCLs; O&M;
Onsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment; Organics;
PCBs; PCE; Pesticides; Plume Management;
RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act; State Permit;
Surface Water; Surface Water Monitoring; TCE;
Toluene; VOCs; Water Quality Criteria;
Wetlands; Xylenes.
108
-------
OUTBOARD MARINE, IL
First Remedial Action (Amendment)
March 31, 1989
The Outboard Marine site is on the west shore
of Lake Michigan in Waukegan, Illinois. A
marine products manufacturing plant operated at
the site for approximately 20 years until
production ended in the early 1970s. From 1961
to 1972 hydraulic fluid containing PCBs was used
at the plant in the die cast works. This fluid was
later discharged to Slip 3 of the harbor, a parking
lot north of the plant, and three areas known as
the North Ditch, Oval Lagoon, and Crescent
Ditch. There is an estimated 700,000 pounds of
PCBs onsite and approximately 300,000 pounds in
Waukegan Harbor. In 1984 EPA began
engineering design work for the selected remedial
actions presented in a 1984 ROD to clean up
contaminated soil and sediment at the site.
During 1985, however, all actions were suspended
due to litigation between Outboard Marine
Corporation (OMC) and EPA regarding EPA
access to OMC's property. Section 122 of SARA
specifically addressed access problems and upon
its effective date, negotiations with OMC resumed
for implementation of the remedy. After
negotiations between EPA and OMC were
completed, a consent decree was signed in 1986
by OMC. Under the consent decree most
portions of the remedial action described in the
1984 ROD remain unchanged. An onsite
treatment step was added, however, to meet the
SARA preference for treatment requirement.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the soil and sediment are organics including
PCBs.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
construction of a cutoff wall and slurry wall to
isolate Slip 3 and form a containment cell;
construction of a new slip to replace Slip 3, and
relocation of Larsen Marine; removal and
treatment using a chemical extraction process or
thermal treatment of sediment in Slip 3 exceeding
500 mg/kg PCBs and soil and sediment exceeding
10,000 mg/kg PCBs from the Crescent Ditch/Oval
Lagoon Area; dredging of upper harbor sediment
above 50 mg/kg and placement of contaminated
sediment in the new Slip 3 containment cell;
construction of a west containment cell for
treatment residues and lower concentration
PCB-contaminated soil; construction of an east
containment cell around the parking lot area;
construction of a temporary, onsite water
treatment facility for dredged water; construction
of a permanent water treatment facility; onsite
treatment of containment cell water followed by
discharge to either a POTW or an onsite
location; capping of all containment cells; and
ground water monitoring. The estimated capital
cost for this remedial action is $19,000,000; O&M
costs were not provided.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
A PCB cleanup level of 50 mg/kg was established
based on site-specific data. Hot spots for soil and
sediment have been defined as greater than 500
mg/kg PCBs in the Crescent Ditch/Oval Lagoon
and 10,000 mg/kg PCBs in Slip 3. These
correspond to "muck" layers below which PCBs
have not significantly penetrated. The onsite
treatment system is an extraction process, which
must result in a 97 percent PCB removal level.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Capping; Carbon Adsorption
(GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Water
Act; Dredging; Excavation; Ground Water
Monitoring; Incineration/Thermal Destruction;
O&M; Offsite Disposal; Offsite Treatment; Onsite
Containment; Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment;
Organics; PCBs; Public Exposure; Publicly Owned
Treatment Works (POTW); ROD Amendment;
Sediment; Slurry Wall; Soil; Solvent Extraction;
Surface Water; Surface Water Treatment; Toxic
Substances Control Act; Treatment Technology.
WATTE PARK WELLS, MN
First Remedial Action - Final
September 28, 1989
The 45-acre Waite Park Wells site is in Waite
Park, Stearns County, Minnesota, 1,500 feet east
of the Sauk River. Waite Park municipal wells
#1 and #3 served the city until December 1984
when routine sampling detected organic
contamination in the ground water. The
contaminated plume extends east-southeast from
the Electric Machinery Manufacturing Company
to the wells which are situated in the northeast
corner of the Burlington Northern Superfund site.
109
-------
In January 1985 the State issued a health advisory
to residents to discontinue using municipal water
for drinking and cooking. A water hook up with
St. Cloud, Minnesota was completed in February
1985 to provide the 3,500 Waite Park residents
with an alternate water supply. In February 1988,
the five responsible parties at the site funded a
municipal water treatment system and wells #1
and #3 were returned to service. Remedial
investigations did not identify any significant soil
contamination at the site in the vicinity of the
Electric Machinery Company; however, ground
water contamination was identified in the shallow
aquifer and, to a lesser extent, in the deep
aquifer. This ROD represents the final response
action for the Electric Machinery portion of the
Waite Park Wells site. The primary contaminants
of concern in the ground water are VOCs
including PCE and TCE.
The selected remedial action for the site includes
ground water pumping and onsite treatment of
the contamination plumes of both the shallow
and deep aquifers using packed towers aeration
(air stripping); discharge of treated ground water
from the packed tower aeration system to the
Sauk River under an NPDES permit; and surface
water monitoring and long-term ground water
monitoring. The estimated present worth cost for
this remedial action is $913,000. O&M costs
were not provided.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water risk reduction will be achieved by
continuing to pump and treat ground water until
the more restrictive of SDWA MCLs or the
State's Recommended Allowable Limits (RALs)
for each VOC in the shallow and deep aquifers
are met. Chemical-specific cleanup levels include
PCE 6.6 ug/1 (RAL) and TCE 5 ug/1 (MCL).
Surface water discharge to the Sauk River will
comply with Clean Water Act Ambient Water
Quality Criteria. Chemical-specific discharge
goals include PCE 8.9 ug/1 and TCE 123 ug/1. In
addition, discharges to Sauk River will comply
with NPDES permit standards.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS; Aeration; Air Stripping;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Water Act;
Direct Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; MCLs; Offsite
Discharge; Onsite Treatment; Organics; PCE;
Plume Management; Safe Drinking Water Act;
State Standards/Regulations; Surface Water
Monitoring; TCE; VOCs; Water Quality Criteria.
WAUCONDA SAND & GRAVEL, IL
Second Remedial Action - Final
March 31, 1989
The 74-acre Wauconda Sand & Gravel site
includes 52 acres of permitted and unpermitted
landfill areas and is in Lake County, Illinois,
north of the village of Wauconda. The area
neighboring the site includes agricultural land,
residential properties including 12 homes within
1 mile of the landfill, and 2 new residential
developments. Most residences use well water
but the wells lie outside the ground water flow
boundaries of the moderately contaminated
shallow aquifer, which lies directly beneath the
site. A deeper aquifer, which is connected to the
shallow aquifer and is the predominant source of
drinking water for area residents, does not appear
to be contaminated. From 1941 to mid 1978, the
site owner accepted primarily nonhazardous
municipal, residential, commercial, and industrial
wastes; there are, however, an estimated 30,000
cubic yards of hazardous wastes onsite. The
landfill was closed in July 1978 and was
subsequently covered by a layer of clay and soil.
Since the late 1970s leachate has been discharging
to a nearby creek, and surface water sampling
taken from this creek has revealed low
concentrations of VOCs, PCBs, and metals. In a
1985 ROD EPA determined that a leachate
collection system was needed to prevent further
ground water contamination. This ROD, the
second and final operable unit, further
characterizes ground water quality via long-term
monitoring to ensure that existing measures are
protective of human health and the environment.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the ground water, surface water, and air are
VOCs including vinyl chloride and benzene;
metals including arsenic and lead; and methane.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
long-term monitoring of ground water, surface
water, and air emissions with possible evaluation
110
-------
of additional remedial alternatives and a ROD
amendment if action levels are exceeded; further
upgrade of the site cap and possible relocation of
a nearby creek; installation and operation of an
improved venting system with possible air
emissions treatment; continued operation and/or
maintenance of the leachate collection and
venting systems, site cap, fence, and monitoring
well network; and implementation of institutional
controls to restrict ground water use. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $12,155,606, which includes annual
O&M costs of $174,500.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
SDWA MCLs and State Public and Food
Processing Standards are considered ARARs for
offsite ground water quality. If offeite ground
water exceeds an MCL or a 10'5 cumulative
cancer-risk level for lifetime drinking water usage
(excluding arsenic and vinyl chloride) and the
representative background concentrations,
additional investigations will be performed
possibly resulting in a ROD amendment. The
leachate collection system will continue to operate
until action levels are established and attained.
Air emissions will be controlled and treated if the
incremental risk to nearby residents is greater
than 10"6 lifetime exposure.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls will be implemented to restrict the use
of ground water from the shallow aquifer.
KEYWORDS: Air; Air Monitoring; Arsenic;
Background Levels; Benzene; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Water Act; Closure
Requirements; Direct Contact; Drinking Water
Contaminants; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Institutional Controls; Leachate
Collection/Treatment; Lead; MCLs; Metals; O&M;
RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water; Surface
Water Monitoring; VOCs; Water Quality Criteria.
WAUSAU WATER SUPPLY, WI
First Remedial Action
December 23, 1988
The Wausau Water Supply site, also known as
the Wausau Groundwater Contamination site,
encompasses an area in the northern section of
the City of Wausau, Marathon County, Wisconsin.
The site contains five of six production wells in
the City Well Field and is located on both sides
of the Wisconsin River. Production wells CW6,
CW7, and CW9 are located in a predominantly
residential area on the west side of the river and
are collectively referred to as the West Well
Field. The remaining two wells, CW3 and CW4,
are located in a predominantly industrial section
of the city on the east side of the river and are
referred to as the East Well Field. The wells
supply nearly all the potable water for
approximately 33,000 people, as well as irrigation
and industrial water to surrounding areas. In
1982, the city discovered that wells CW3, CW4,
and CW6 were contaminated with VOCs. Since
that time, several systems have been implemented
to reduce VOC levels in the water supply.
Initially, uncontaminated water from CW9 and
CW7 was blended with water from CW3, CW4,
and CW6 to dilute the VOC concentrations.
However, increasing VOC concentrations resulted
in regulatory limits being exceeded. In 1983,
EPA granted funds to help design and install a
packed tower VOC stripper, and in June 1984
installed a granular activated carbon (GAC)
treatment system on CW6 in response to a
continued increase in VOC concentration. CW6
previously had been pumped and discharged
directly into Bos Creek to block the contaminated
plume from reaching CW7 and CW9 to the north,
but this resulted in surface water and sediment
contamination in Bos Creek. Water from CW6,
CW3, and CW4 has been pumped to the city
water treatment plant following the installation of
VOC stripper towers at the plant during the
summer and fall of 1984. However, there is a
significant risk of plume migration because CW6
remains the sole interceptor well blocking
contamination of the remaining West Well Field.
Currently, the city continues to blend treated
water with water from uncontaminated supply
wells to ensure low VOC levels in its water
supply. The scope of this expedited operable unit
is limited to the contaminant plume affecting
111
-------
CW6 in the West Well Field. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the West Well
Reid at the site are VOCs including TCE.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
ground water pumping and treatment using air
stripping with discharge to the Wisconsin River,
groundwater monitoring; and provision for
implementation of an additional extraction well as
necessary. The estimated present worth cost for
this remedial action is $750,000 with estimated
annual O&M costs of $105,000 for year one and
$81,000 for subsequent years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Remedy addresses plume management through
pumping and treatment of ground water. Effluent
levels to be determined by the State will satisfy
the Best Available Technology requirements of
theCWA.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS; Air Stripping; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Water Act; Direct Contact;
Drinking Water Supply; Ground Water; Ground
Water Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Interim Remedy; O&M; Onsite Discharge; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; Plume Management; State
Permit; State Standards/Regulations; TCE; VOCs;
Water Quality Criteria.
WAUSAU WATER SUPPLY, WI
Second Remedial Action - Final
September 29, 1989
The Wausau Water Supply site, also known as
the Wausau Ground Water Contamination site,
is in Wausau, Marathon County, Wisconsin. The
site includes six city ground water production
wells along the east and west sides of the
Wisconsin River. These wells supply drinking
water to 33,000 people, and is used for industry
in the area. Three primary source areas of
ground water contamination have been identified;
a municipal landfill, the Wausau Chemical
Company, and the Wausau Energy Company.
The landfill, which is on the west side of the site,
operated from 1948 to 1955 and accepted almost
all commercial, industrial, and residential waste
generated within Wausau. The landfill appears to
be the predominant source of TCE contamination
in the underlying aquifer. On the east side of the
river the Wausau Chemical and Wausau Energy
companies are suspected sources of soil and
ground water contamination due to spills from
past operations. Wausau Chemical, a bulk
solvent distributer, was responsible for spilling
1,000 gallons of PCE-contaminated waste in 1983
alone. Wausau Energy, a petroleum bulk storage
and disposal center, has reportedly contaminated
soil and ground water with petroleum by-products.
To provide sufficient water of acceptable quality
EPA temporarily installed a granular activated
carbon treatment system on one well in 1984 and
VOC stripping towers at the municipal water
treatment plant to treat water from two
contaminated wells. The city has been blending
treated water with uncontaminated water to
reduce VOC levels. As an interim remedy, EPA
signed a 1989 ROD implementing ground water
contamination controls, which included pumping
and treatment at one of the landfill source areas
followed by discharge into the Wisconsin River,
to prevent the contaminant plume from migrating
to the source of the river. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil and
ground water are VOCs including PCE and TCE.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
treating contaminated soil using an in- situ soil
vapor extraction (SVE) system and treating gases
emitted from the SVE system using vapor phase
carbon filters; and continued pumping and
treatment of ground water using existing air
strippers with modified pumpage rates. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $738,000, which includes present worth
O&M costs of $482,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Performance goals for this remedial action are
based on the State ground water standards which
include PCE 1.0 ug/1 and TCE 1.8 ug/1.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Clean Air Act; Direct Contact; Drinking Water
Contaminants; Ground Water; Ground Water
Treatment; MCLs; Municipally Owned Site;
O&M; Onsite Treatment; PCE; Plume
112
-------
Management; Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil;
Sole-Source Aquifer; State Standards/ Regulations;
TCE; Treatment Technology; Vacuum Extraction;
VOCs.
WEDZEB ENTERPRISES, IN
First Remedial Action - Final
June 30, 1989
The 0.75-acre Wedzeb Enterprises site is located
in Lebanon, Indiana, in a mixed residential and
light industry neighborhood. About 300 houses
are located within 500 feet of the site perimeter.
Originally, two warehouses, one of which was
used as a storage facility for electrical capacitors
and transformers containing polychlorinated
biphenyls (PCBs), were located onsite. In May
1981 the warehouse used for storage was
completely destroyed by fire, which raised
concerns about the release of PCBs into the
environment and the potential formation of new
compounds such as dioxins and furans. The
warehouse contained an estimated 77 tons of
electrical capacitors at the time, some of which
exploded during the fire. In October 1987 EPA
completed a removal action removing onsite
debris and contaminated soil and replacing it with
clean fill. The remediation of the sanitary sewer
sediment in this action serves as a cautionary
measure because contaminants may have been
washed into the sewer lines during the fire,
providing a source of long-term contaminant
release to the Lebanon POTW. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the sewer
sediment are organics including PCBs.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
cleaning the sewer lines with hydraulic jets and
vacuum pumping to remove contaminants,
followed by filtering the resulting water and
sediment to remove PCB-contaminated sediment,
and discharging the water to the POTW; offeite
incineration and disposal of the estimated 2
drums of sediment and 20 drums of remedial
investigation generated waste if PCB levels are 50
mg/kg or greater, or offeite disposal only if PCB
levels are below 50 mg/kg; and a television
inspection of the pipeline to ensure structural
integrity. The estimated present worth cost for
this remedial action is $45,000; there are no
O&M costs.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
In accordance with health-based guidance cleanup
levels set forth in the TSCA Spill Policy, the PCB
concentration in the sewer sediment will not
exceed a 10 mg/kg level.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Carcinogenic Compounds; Direct
Contact; Incineration/Thermal Destruction; Offeite
Discharge; Offeite Disposal; Offeite Treatment;
Organics; PCBs; Publicly Owned Treatment
Works (POTW); Sediment; Toxic Substances
Control Act (TSCA); Treatment Technology.
WHITEHALL MUNICIPAL WELLS, MI
First Remedial Action - Final
September 29, 1989
The Whitehall Municipal Wells site is in
Whitehall, Michigan, and includes production well
3 (PW3) which is the the focus of this ROD.
PCE has been detected in the soil and ground
water. The suspected source of the PCE is a
nearby dry-cleaning operation which leaked PCE
until the problem was corrected in 1981. In 1980
the State identified PW3 as the source of
contamination in the municipal drinking water
supply and recommended that the city use PW3
only on an emergency basis. The State continued
to monitor the well, and until October 1988 the
city used the well only on an as-needed basis at
reduced pumping rates. Results from the
remedial investigation conducted in 1988-89
revealed only low levels of contamination in the
wells; no contaminant exceeded MCLs or MCLGs.
In September 1989 the city permanently
abandoned PW3 because of the well's poor
production capacity, and because new wells and
storage facilities built since 1980 have reduced the
need for PW3.
The selected remedial action for this site is no
further action because the- findings of the
remedial investigation indicated that contaminant
levels in the site's wells do not exceed any State
or Federal drinking water standards or criteria
and there is no longer a continuing source of
contamination. There are no present worth or
O&M costs associated with this remedial action.
113
-------
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
There are no applicable performance standards
for this remedial action because a remedy of no
further action was selected.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: No Action Remedy.
WINDOM DUMP, MN
First Remedial Action - Final
September 29, 1989
The 11-acre Windom Dump site is a former
municipal landfill in Windom, Cottonwood
County, Minnesota. Land use in the vicinity of
the site includes residential areas and commercial,
industrial, and agricultural operations. City water
supply wells northwest of the site lie
downgradient of the landfill. Landfilling
operations began in the 1930s and continued until
1974. During this period, paint sludges from a
large manufacturing operation were disposed of
along with municipal refuse resulting in low levels
of toxic substances contaminating an underlying
aquifer, which is used as a water supply. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
ground water are VOCs including benzene, PCE,
and TCE; metals including arsenic; and other
inorganics.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
grading and capping the fill area with a two-foot
clay cap overlain by one foot of granular material,
topsoil, and new vegetation; modifying the existing
municipal water plant by installing additional
aeration nozzles and structure venting; and
ground water monitoring. In the event that
allowable contaminant limits are exceeded in the
monitoring wells, a contingency plan including a
ground water pump and treatment system will be
implemented. The estimated present worth cost
for this remedial action is $865,000, which
includes an annual O&M cost of $5,700 for 30
years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The municipal water treatment system will remove
VOCs and maintain a 10"5 lifetime excess cancer
risk and contaminant concentrations less than
SDWA MCLs. Ground water will be pumped
and treated if the ground water exceeds any single
allowable contaminant limit. Specific intervention
limits are based on State solid waste management
rules and include TCE 7.8 ug/1, PCE 1.7 ug/1,
benzene 3.0 ug/1, and arsenic 12.5 ug/1.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Arsenic; Benzene; Capping;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Water Act;
Closure Requirements; Contingent Remedy;
Direct Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Inorganics; MCLs; Metals; O&M; Onsite
Containment; PCE; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water
Act; Soil; State Standards/Regulations; TCE;
VOCs.
114
-------
RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
REGION VI
(Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas)
HOMESTAKE MINING, NM
First Remedial Action - Final
September 27; 1989
The Homestake Mining Company (HMC) site
consists of a uranium processing mill and two
tailings embankments in Cibola County, New
Mexico, about 6 miles north of Milan. The
tailings embankments contain a combined total
of 22 million tons of tailings material covering
225 acres. Four housing subdivisions are south
and southwest of the mill with the nearest
residence approximately 0.6 mile from the tailings
embankments. In 1983 elevated levels of
selenium were found in offsite ground water
prompting EPA to require HMC, under a consent
agreement, to supply municipal water to residents
in the subdivision south of the mill.
Furthermore, HMC implemented an aquifer
protection and restoration program including
ground water injection/collection efforts at the
site, which was subsequently formalized, modified
and approved pursuant to requirements of the
State. The restoration program continued to
operate and has been largely successful in onsite
containment of tailings seepage. This ROD
addresses possible radon releases from the
uranium mill operations into residential
subdivisions. From 1987-1989 HMC, under an
Administrative Order on Consent, conducted an
investigation as to whether radon associated with
the uranium mill tailings operation might be
influencing outdoor and indoor radon levels in
the subdivisions. Based on the results of HMC's
investigation, EPA has determined that the
uranium mill and tailings embankments at the site
are not contributing significantly to offsite
subdivision radon contamination and that it does
not have authority under CERCLA to address
radon levels due to natural soil concentrations.
In June 1986 the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC) resumed jurisdiction over uranium mills
in the State and issued HMC a radioactive
materials license. NRC intends to close the site
pursuant to their regulations and will coordinate
their requirements with EPA.
The selected remedial action for this site is no
further action for the Radon Operable Unit.
However, EPA is recommending radon reduction
techniques to residents having elevated indoor
radon levels.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Not applicable.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: No Action Remedy.
MOTCO,TX
Second Remedial Action - Final
September 27, 1989
The 11-acre Motco site is in La Marque,
Galveston County, Texas. The site is on the Gulf
Coastal Plain at the edge of a coastal marsh
system and is within the 100-year tidal floodplain.
Significant site features include seven unlined pits
which have a total surface area of 4.6 acres and
contain surface water, organic liquids, and various
sludges, tars, and other solids. The pits were
used by a styrene tar recycling business which
operated from 1959 to 1961, and by an industrial
chemical waste disposal facility from 1961 to
1968. EPA conducted three emergency response
actions between 1981 to 1983 to treat and
discharge excess pit surface water collected in
dikes that were constructed by the Coast Guard
in 1980. In 1984 an initial remedial measure
(IRM) was conducted by EPA and included
removal and offsite disposal of wastes from nine
above ground storage tanks. The first operable
unit for the site was issued in 1985 and dealt with
source control measures including excavation of
the onsite waste pits, which contained 12 million
gallons of contaminated water and organic liquids,
down to the sludge/soil interface plus one foot,
and incineration of those wastes. This ROD
represents the second and final operable unit,
management of migration, for the site and
addresses the subsurface beneath the waste pits
and offsite contamination of the ground water,
115
-------
soil, and sediment. Ground water at the site is
found in a Transmissive Zone and the underlying
Upper Chicot aquifer. The primary contaminants
of concern affecting the soil, sediment, and
ground water are VOCs including benzene; other
organics including PAHs; and metals including
arsenic, chromium, and lead.
The selected remedial action for the site includes
extraction and onsite treatment by best available
technology (BAT) of contaminated shallow and
deep ground water, extraction and incineration of
approximately 1 to 2 million gallons of dense,
non-aqueous phase organic liquids; installation of
a ground water gradient to impede further
contaminant migration from shallow to deep
ground water; implementation of ground water
compliance monitoring of the shallow and deep
ground water aquifers which would trigger more
aggressive removal operations if indicator
compounds exceed one-half MCL or a 10"* risk
level; excavation, consolidation and onsite
containment and capping of approximately
140,000 cubic yards of contaminated surface soil
and sediment to a maximum depth of four feet;
and implementation of deed restrictions and
installation of additional fences around the site.
The estimated total present worth cost for the
selected remedy is 58,810,000, which includes an
annual O&M cost of $453,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Treatment of ground water using BAT is expected
to meet Federal and State discharge standards. If
discharge standards are not met, ground water
will be sent to a wastewater treatment plant.
Cleanup goals for the Upper Chicot Aquifer are
SDWA MCLs or a IQf6 cancer-risk level.
Treatment of shallow transmissive zone ground
water will be to health-based numbers, including
a total cumulative level for all PAHs of 0.0028
ug/1. Soil/ sediment excavation will be determined
by a Iff* risk level.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed
restrictions will be implemented to prohibit land
development.
KEYWORDS: Arsenic; Benzene; Capping;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Chromium; Clean
Water Act; Closure Requirements; Excavation;
Floodplain; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Incineration/Thermal Destruction; Institutional
Controls; Lead; MCLs; Metals; O&M; Onsite
Containment; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Disposal;
Onsite Treatment; Organics; PAHs; Plume
Management; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act;
Sediment; Soil; Treatment Technology; VOCs;
Water Quality Criteria; Wetlands.
PESSES CHEMICAL, TX
First Remedial Action - Final
December 22, 1988
The 4.2-acre Pesses Chemical site is located in
Tarrant County, Ft. Worth, Texas. The site is
situated in a light industrial and commercial area
with approximately 19,500 people estimated to
reside or work within a one-mile radius. The site
is divided into two sections. The northern section
is fenced and includes an occupied office building
and brick warehouse as well as the former
operations area composed of a metal warehouse,
various equipment, a bag house, a storage yard,
and two underground sumps. The southern
portion contains the abandoned south field. In
June 1979, the Pesses Company began operations
to reclaim cadmium and nickel from dry-cell
batteries and metal sludges without required
construction of operation permits. During July
and August 1979, excessive cadmium emissions
were investigated by both the city and State air
pollution control offices. After operations began
again, cadmium emissions were measured as high
as 2,900 percent above permit limits. In January
1981, the parent company declared bankruptcy
and site operations were discontinued. In March
1983, a grass fire at the site resulted in toxic
cadmium oxide fumes which hospitalized a
firefighter. Approximately 1,500 deteriorating
drums remained onsite with heavy metal sludges,
power, and empty battery cases. Consequently, in
April 1983, EPA removed 3,400 cubic yards of
soil, drummed material, and debris from the site
and installed a clay cap in the south storage yard
to prevent exposure to contaminated soil. Heavy
metals contamination of airborne dust and surface
water runoff are the main potential threats at the
site. In addition to soil contamination, two
sumps in the southern portion contain 1,914
gallons of liquid contaminated with metals and
16.6 cubic yards of sludge contaminated with
116
-------
cadmium and nickel. Furthermore, there is
limited cadmium contamination of offcite soil.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the soil, building, and equipment and debris are
metals including lead.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
consolidation of wastes and contaminated offsite
soil with incorporation into onsite soil, followed
by in-situ stabilization and installation of a
concrete cap around the fenced portion of the
site and a RCRA clay cap placed in the south
field; decontamination of metal warehouse and
equipment with resultant solid wastes combined
with the soil remediation and wastes treated and
discharged into the sewer system; offsite disposal
of drums and debris as well as equipment which
cannot be adequately cleaned and water above
discharge requirements; and cleaning and sealing
of sumps. The estimated capital cost for this
remedial action is $1,200,000 with an annual
O&M cost of $7,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOAT.fr
Target soil action levels are cadmium 15 mg/1 and
nickel 100 mg/1 based on a 1Q-* carcinogenic-risk
level.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Capping; Clean Closure; Debris;
Decontamination; Direct Contact; Excavation;
Lead; Metals; Offsite Disposal; O&M; Onsite
Containment; Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment;
Publicly Owned Treatment Works; RCRA; RCRA
Closure Requirements; Sludge; Soil; Stabilization;
Treatability Studies; Treatment Technology.
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL!
First Remedial Action
December 29, 1988
,TX
The 110-acre Sheridan Disposal Services site is
approximately 9 miles northwest of the city of
Hempstead in Waller County, Texas. The site is
located on the 100-year floodplain of the Brazos
River and is bordered by a lake to the south,
farmland, and a community of 20 residences to
the north. The Evangeline aquifer, which runs
under the site, is used to meet the drinking water
needs of several communities nearby. Sheridan
Disposal Services operated as a commercial waste
disposal facility from about 1958 to 1984 using
steam distillation, open burning, incineration, and
direct disposal into a waste lagoon to dispose of
various organic and inorganic chemical and solid
wastes. The site includes a 12 to 22-acre lagoon,
a 17-acre dike surrounding the lagoon, a 42-acre
evaporation/land irrigation system, and an
incinerator and 9 waste storage and treatment
tanks located on the lagoon dikes. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil and
sludge are VOCs including benzene and toluene,
and other organics including PCBs.
The selected remedial action for the site includes
excavation of all material with PCB
concentrations greater than 25 mg/kg including
13,000 cubic yards of pond and dike soil, 31,000
cubic yards of pond sludge, and 300 cubic yards
of floating oil and emulsion in the pond and
storage tanks. This will be followed by onsite
biotreatment of contaminated soil, sludge, and oil
with stabilization and onsite disposal of residuals
in the pond. If PCB concentrations in the
residuals are less than 50 mg/kg, they will be
placed under a RCRA-compliant cap. Residuals
with PCB concentrations greater than 50 mg/kg
PCB will be placed in a RCRA-compliant landfill
in the pond area. In addition, the remediation
requires capping the entire pond and dike area;
decontamination and offsite disposal of tanks,
drums, and debris; treatment to BAT of any
contaminated wastewater and stormwater with
discharge to the river, implementation of
engineering controls to prevent bank erosion on
the river; and ground water monitoring. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $27,956,000, which includes total O&M
costs of $863,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GO AT &
An action level for PCBs was established at 25
mg/kg based on a health-risk analysis and the
TSCA Spill Policy. Waste residuals will be
disposed of according to PCB levels.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS! Restrictions
were implemented at the site to prevent ground
water use and to preserve the integrity of the cap.
KEYWORDS: Benzene; Biodegradation/Land
Application; Capping; Carbon Adsorption (GAC);
117
-------
Debris; Decontamination; Direct Contact;
Excavation; Floodplain; Ground Water
Monitoring; Incineration/Thermal Destruction;
Institutional Controls; Levees; O&M; Ofisite
Disposal; Oils; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Disposal;
Onsite Treatment; Organics; PCBs; Public
Exposure; Sludge; Soil; Surface Water; Surface
Water Collection/Diversion; Toluene; Toxic
Substances Control Act; Treatability Studies;
Treatment Technology, VOCs.
SHERIDAN DISPOSAL SERVICES, TX
Second Remedial Action
September 27, 1989
The 110-acre Sheridan Disposal Services site is 9
miles northwest of Hempstead, Waller County,
Texas. Agriculture and rangeland are the
predominant land uses in the area. The site is
within the 100-year floodplain of the Brazos
River. Sheridan Disposal Services operated a
commercial waste disposal facility at the site from
1958 to 1984. The facility treated a variety of
organic, inorganic, and solid waste by stream
distillation, open burning, and incineration.
Significant site features include a lagoon which
was used as a holding pond for overflow wastes
and treatment residues, a 17-acre dike
surrounding the lagoon, and a 42-acre evaporation
and land irrigation system used for disposal of
water accumulated on the lagoon. An incinerator
and a group of nine former waste storage and
treatment tanks are situated on the lagoon dikes.
A source control ROD was issued in December
1988 and addressed risks associated with exposure
to contaminated soil and sludge at the site. This
remedial action represents the second of two
operable units for the site and its goal is to
prevent exposure to contaminated ground water
and maintain protective levels in the river. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
ground water are VOCs including benzene, PCE,
and TCE; and metals including arsenic.
The selected remedial action for this site is
natural attenuation, and the establishment of
Alternate Concentration Limits (ACLs) as the
site ground water protection standards; ground
water monitoring to ensure ACLs are not
exceeded; sampling and analysis of the Brazos
River immediately upgradient and downgradient
of the entry point of ground water into the River;
implementation of ground water use restrictions
to ensure affected ground water is not consumed;
and the implementation of a corrective action
plan if ACLs are exceeded in the future. The
estimated present worth cost for the selected
remedy is $194,000, which is due entirely to
O&M.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
EPA has set ACLs for contaminants detected in
the ground water to meet drinking water criteria
in the Brazos River. Chemical-specific ACL
concentrations were selected for benzene 26 mg/1,
TCE 26 mg/1, PCE 41 mg/1, and arsenic 260 mg/1.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Ground water
use at the site will be restricted to ensure that
contaminated ground water is not consumed and
that the integrity of the Brazos River as a
hydraulic barrier to ground water flow is
maintained.
KEYWORDS: ACL; Arsenic; Benzene;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Water Act;
Direct Contact; Floodplain; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; Institutional Controls;
MCLs; Metals; PCE; Plume Management; RCRA;
Safe Drinking Water Act; State
Standards/Regulations; Surface Water Monitoring;
TCE; VOCs; Water Quality Criteria.
SOUTH VALLEY, NM
Fifth Remedial Action - Final
March 30, 1989
The South Valley/Edmunds Street site is a
portion of the South Valley Superfund site - a
large area in the southern part of the city of
Albuquerque, New Mexico. The South Valley
site surrounds a city municipal water well
identified as San Jose-6. Within this larger area
are a number of industrial properties owned and
operated by different groups and individuals. The
site has been divided into operable units to
address soil and ground water contamination
resulting from current and historical industrial
practices. The operable units include Edmunds
Street Ground Water, Former Air Force Plant
83/GE, San Jose-6, and the final operable unit,
Edmunds Street Source Control. Potential
118
-------
sources of ground water contamination within the
Edmunds Street property have been identified,
but primary focus has been given to a drainage
pit area which receives most of the drainage from
the property. Investigations in all of the
suspected potential contaminant source areas,
however, revealed little soil contamination. Even
if further migration of contaminants to ground
water occurs, the ground water treatment system
developed in the previous Edmunds Street
Ground Water operable unit will be sufficient to
address these concerns. There are no
contaminants of concern affecting the soil at this
site.
The selected remedial response for this final
operable unit is no further action. Based on
sampling data, the soil has been determined to
contain contaminant levels below hazardous
contaminant concentration limits and poses no
risk to human health or the environment. The
only further activities anticipated at the site are
sampling of soil gases in the drainage pit area
following the ground water remedial action, and
the precautions necessary to prevent any
disturbance of drainage pit soil during the ground
water remediation. There are no remedial or
O&M costs associated with this operable unit.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Chemical-specific standards or goals are not
applicable for this no action remedy.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL- Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: No Action Remedy.
UNITED CREOSOTLNG, TX
Second Remedial Action - Final
September 29, 1989
The 100-acre United Creosoting site is in Conroe,
Montgomery County, Texas. The site currently is
occupied by a distributing company, a
construction company, and a residential
subdivision. From 1946 to 1972, the United
Creosoting Company operated a wood preserving
facility at the site which used PCPs and creosote
in the wood preservation process. PCP and
creosote wastes were stored in two waste ponds
on the property of the distributing company.
During 1980 the county improved area roads
using soil and waste pond backfill from the site.
Because residents living near the improved
roadways experienced health problems, the county
sampled and compared leachate composition from
the affected roadways and the site and determined
that the leachate from both the site and the
roadways were contaminated with PCPs.
Roadway soil was subsequently removed and
disposed of using land farm treatment. In 1983,
due to contaminated stormwater runoff from the
former waste pond areas, the property owner was
directed under terms of an EPA Administrative
Order to regrade contaminated soil, divert surface
water drainage away from the residential portion
of the site, and cap contaminated soil. This ROD
specifies a final remedy for the contaminated soil
and complements a 1986 ROD which determined
that no action is necessary to remediate shallow
ground water. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil are organics including
PAHs, PCPs, and dioxins.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
excavation and onsite treatment of 94,000 cubic
yards of soil containing contaminants which
exceed target action levels, using critical fluid
extraction and recycling or discharging wastewater
generated during the treatment process;
incinerating and disposing of the liquid organic
concentrate residues offsite; spreading treated soil
on the commercial portion of the site; backfilling
residential areas with clean fill; and air
monitoring. The estimated present worth cost for
this remedial action is $22,000,000 which includes
present worth O&M costs of $19,750,000 for 30
years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR OPAIS-
Contaminated soil will be excavated and treated
if soil exceeds established target action levels.
The target action levels vary depending on
whether the soil was excavated from the
residential or commercial portion of the site.
Specific target action levels for carcinogens in
excavated soil include PAHs 330 ug/kg for the
residential area and PAHs 40,000 ug/kg for the
commercial area of the site. Target action levels
for dioxins and furans in excavated soil are based
on 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1 ug/kg for the residential area
and 2,3,7,8-TCDD 20 ug/kg for the commercial
119
-------
area. Specific target action levels for
noncarcinogens include PAHs 2,000 mg/kg and
PCP 150 mg/kg.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS; Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean
Air Act; Clean Water Act; Dioxin; Excavation;
Filling; Floodplain; Incineration/Thermal
Destruction; Offeite Disposal; Offeite Treatment;
O&M; Organics; Onsite Discharge; Onsite
Disposal; Onsite Treatment; PAHs; RCRA; Soil;
Solvent Extraction; State Standards/Regulations;
Temporary Storage; Treatment Technology;
Water Quality Criteria.
120
-------
RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
REGION VII
(Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska)
ARKANSAS CITY DUMP, KS
Second Remedial Action - Final
September 19, 1989
The 200-acre Arkansas City Dump site, in
Arkansas City, Cowley County, Kansas, abuts a
levee to the west and south which separates the
site from the Arkansas River. Between 1916 and
1927, an oil refinery was operated onsite
processing between 6,000 and 12,000 barrels of
oil per day. After an explosion destroyed the
refinery in 1927, the site was used as a municipal
landfill. The refinery treated petroleum fractions
with sulfuric acid to improve color and to remove
asphaltenes, parafins, and resinous substances
generating acid sludge waste in the process. The
sludge waste was disposed of onsite in earthen
pits in the north waste area and remediation of
this area was addressed in a 1988 ROD, as
operable unit one. The second and final operable
unit addresses the remainder of the site, which
contains subsurface petroleum contaminants
trapped in the soil below the water table as a
result of petroleum spills. Results from remedial
investigations revealed only low levels of soil and
ground water contamination due to the petroleum
wastes although municipal wastes were also
disposed of onsite. These contaminants, however,
are not being released in significant
concentrations and do not pose a significant
threat to human health or the environment.
The selected remedial action for this site is no
further action beyond the remedy selected in the
first ROD on the site. Because EPA lacks
jurisdiction or authority under CERCLA/SARA
to undertake remedial action for
petroleum-related contaminant releases, no further
action will be taken under the Superfund
program. There are no costs associated with this
no action remedy.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Not applicable.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Ground Water; No Action
Remedy; Oils; Soil.
First Remedial Action
September 27, 1989
The Chemplex site is in Clinton County within 5
miles of Clinton, Iowa, and includes a landfill, a
wastewater treatment plant, and an adjacent
facility which manufactures high and low density
polyethylene. Several residences with private
wells are located around the site and a tributary
to Rock Creek lies to the south and southeast of
the site. Rock Creek eventually discharges to the
Mississippi River just above the Upper
Mississippi River Wildlife Refuge. The direction
of ground water flow beneath the site appears to
be toward the southwest, although a mounding
effect is causing ground water to flow radially
from the center of the landfill. From 1968 to
1978 the landfill area was used for disposal of
various plant wastes including black oily sludge,
scrap polyethylene, construction debris, and
carbonate sludge. The debutanized aromatic
concentrate (DAC) area, which consists of a pit
and DAC product storage and loading areas, was
contaminated by DAC spillage. In 1987, waste
was reportedly removed from an onsite polishing
basin and disposed of in a RCRA-permitted
landfill. Wastes and spills have contaminated the
soil and ground water underneath the landfill and
DAC areas. This first operable unit will address
the plumes of ground water contamination. A
subsequent operable unit remedy for this site will
address the cleanup of soil and other ground
water remediation that may be required. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
ground water are VOCs including benzene,
toluene, xylenes, TCE, and PCE; and other
organics including carcinogenic and
noncarcinogenic PAHs.
121
-------
The selected remedial action for this first
operable unit includes pumping and pretreatment
of ground water followed by treatment of
pretreated ground water at the existing onsite
biological activated sludge wastewater treatment
plant with discharge to the Mississippi River via
Rock Creek; and implementation of ground water
use restrictions. The estimated present worth
cost for this remedial action is $2,622,000, which
includes an annual O&M cost of $219,600 for 30
years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water cleanup goals were derived from
Health Advisory Levels (HALs), Negligible Risk
Levels (NRLs), CWA Water Quality Criteria
(WQC) and SDWA MCLs. Specific goals include
benzene 1.0 ug/1 (NRL), toluene 2,000 ug/1
(HAL), PCE 10 ug/1 (HAL), TCB 3.0 ug/1 (NRL),
and xylene 10,000 ug/1 (MCL).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls will be used to restrict use of ground
water until remedial actions achieve cleanup of
the contaminated ground water to required levels.
In addition, deed restrictions will be implemented
to prevent the sale of the landfill or a change in
land use without State approval.
KEYWORDS; Air Stripping; Benzene;
Biodegradation; Carbon Adsorption (GAC);
Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Water Act;
Direct Contact; Ground Water; Ground Water
Treatment; Institutional Controls; MCLs; Offeite
Discharge; Offeite Disposal; O&M; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; PAHs; PCE; Plume
Management; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act;
State Standards/Regulations; TCE; Toluene;
VOCs; Water Quality Criteria; Xylenes.
CHEROKEE COUNTY, KS
Second Remedial Action
September 18, 1989
The Cherokee County site is a lead and zinc
mining area in the southeastern corner of Kansas.
The 25 square-mile Galena subsite is one of six
subsites within the Cherokee County site and
consists of large areas covered by mine wastes,
water-filled subsidence craters, and open mine
shafts. Many of the shafts are direct conduits to
the shallow ground water aquifer which is the
sole source of drinking water for approximately
1,050 persons residing outside of the Galena city
limits. The approximately 3,500 Galena residents
receive their water supply from two deep aquifer
wells. EPA began investigations of the Galena
subsite in 1985 and determined that the shallow
ground water aquifer and surface water were
contaminated with elevated concentrations of
metals. The first operable unit was signed in
1987 and provides for construction of an alternate
water supply to serve rural residents in the
vicinity of .Galena, previously reliant on the
shallow ground water. EPA has in the interim
installed water treatment units on several private
wells. This ROD represents the second of two
operable units and addresses the threat of
contamination to the shallow ground water
aquifer and surface water. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the ground
water and surface water are metals including
cadmium, lead, and zinc.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
the removal, consolidation, and onsite placement
in mine pits, shafts, and subsidences of surface
mine wastes; diversion and channelization of
surface streams with recontouring and vegetation
of land surface; and investigation of deep aquifer
well quality followed by plugging all abandoned
and inactive wells and rehabilitating active wells,
if necessary. The estimated present worth cost
for this remedial action is $8,295,215, which
includes an annual O&M cost of $14,963.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The selected remedy provides action levels for the
selective placement of mine wastes below ground.
Chemical-specific action levels include lead 1,000
mg/kg, cadmium 25 mg/kg, and zinc 5,000 mg/kg.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls will include deed restrictions prohibiting
future mining or excavation on the affected
properties or other activities that would
compromise the remedial action.
KEYWORDS: Clean Water Act; Direct
Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants;
Excavation; Floodplain; Ground Water;
Institutional Controls; Lead; MCLs; MCLGs;
Metals; Mining Wastes; O&M; Onsite
122
-------
Containment; Safe Drinking Water Act;
Sole-Source Aquifer; State Standards/Regulations;
Surface Water; Surface Water
Collection/Diversion; Wetlands.
DOEPKE DISPOSAL (HOLLIDAY), KS
First Remedial Action - Final
September 21, 1989
The Doepke Disposal (Holliday) site is an
inactive industrial-waste landfill located east of
Holliday, Johnson County, Kansas. The 80-acre
site is within 500 feet of the Kansas River and
lies upstream of the well field and Kansas River
water intakes that supply water to approximately
200,000 county residents. Additional features
bordering the site include an inactive landfill and
an active landfill. During the 1950s and early
1960s the site was used as a landfill for
residential refuse. In 1963 Doepke Disposal
Service, Inc. leased the property and operated a
commercial and industrial waste landfill until
1970, when the State shut down the operation.
Materials such as fiberglass, fiberglass resins, paint
sludges, spent solvents, metal sludges, soaps, and
pesticides were reportedly disposed of at the
landfill. In 1966 fire debris and up to 374 drums
of solvents and organochlorine and
organophosphate pesticides were disposed of at
the site as a result of a fire at a Kansas City
chemical plant. Initially wastes and residues
brought to the site were burned, however, in the
late 1960s burning operations ceased and solid
wastes were buried onsite and liquids were
disposed of in two surface impoundments. In
1977 rock material excavated during the
construction of an interstate was dumped onsite
and in some cases over the deposited waste. The
current owner uses portions of the site for storage
of clay, crushed shales, and crushed limestone.
The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the soil and ground water are VOCs including
benzene, toluene, and xylene; other organics
including PAHs, PCBs, and pesticides; and metals
including chromium and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
removal and oflsite treatment of approximately
96,000 gallons of liquids currently ponded
underground in former surface impoundments;
construction of a multilayer cap over the majority
of the waste disposal area; collection of ground
water seepage and offeite treatment at a POTW,
as necessary; ground water monitoring; and
implementation of deed and access restrictions.
The estimated present worth cost for this
remedial action is $5,970,000, which includes an
estimated annual O&M cost of $107,000 for 30
years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOATS-
No cleanup criteria were established for soil
because soil is going to be capped. Ground water
standards for ground water seepage, treatment
and/or discharge were based on Federal water
quality criteria for protection of aquatic life and
State water quality standards and were determined
for four metals and five organic pesticides.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL! Deed and site
access restrictions will be implemented as part of
this remedial action.
KEYWORDS: Benzene; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Capping; Chromium; Clean Water
Act; Closure Requirements; Direct Contact;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Institutional Controls; Landfill Closure; Lead;
Metals; O&M; Offsite Treatment; Onsite
Containment; Organics; PAHs; PCBs; Pesticides;
Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW);
RCRA; Soil; Solvents; State Standards/
Regulations; Toluene; Water Quality Criteria;
VOCs; Xylenes.
FINDETT, MO
First Remedial Action
December 28, 1988
The Findett/Hayford Bridge Road Ground Water
site is located just north of the city of St. Charles,
in St. Charles County, east-central Missouri. The
site lies 3.2 miles south of the Mississippi River
and is within the floodplain. Land use in the site
vicinity is primarily agriculture, but also includes
a small industrial park containing Findett
Corporation, Cadmus Corporation, and several
other commercial and light industrial
establishments. In addition, there are several
residences within approximately 1,000 feet
northeast and 1,500 feet south of the site. The
Elm Point Wellfield, the primary drinking water
123
-------
supply for St. Charles, is located 1,800 feet
northeast (downgradient) of the site. Until 1980,
Findett Corporation reclaimed heat transfer fluids .
or oils, some of which contained PCBs, and
received waste solvents for reclamation or
recycling. Subsequently, Findett has custom
blended or manufactured organic chemicals for
other companies. The Findett site originally
came to EPA's attention when Findett
Corporation reported its handling of PCBs at the
site. There is PCB-contaminated soil at the
Findett facility as well as the adjacent Cadmus
Corporation facility. The Elm Point Well Field
is also at risk of contamination by releases from
the site. Findett conducted several voluntary PCS
soil cleanups pursuant to EPA Administrative
Orders in 1981 and 1982; however, PCBs as well
as VOCs remain in the soil in concentrations
above recommended levels. In addition, ground
water investigations revealed substantial VOC
contamination in the shallow aquifer near the
contaminant sources and in the deep aquifer
tapped by the nearby well field as a drinking
water source. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the soil and ground water are
VOCs; and other organics including PCBs.
The selected operable unit remedial action for
this site includes onsite ground water pumping
and treatment using air stripping with discharge
to the PbTW; and excavation of contaminated
soil with either offsite disposal or treatment. The
capital costs for the PRP's implementation of the
remedy are estimated at $1,100,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Contaminated soil will be removed and either
disposed of offcite or treated. Ground water will
be treated to remove organic contaminants before
it is discharged to the sewage treatment plant.
Individual contaminant goals were not provided
for either soil or ground water.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Direct Contact;
Excavation; Floodplain; Ground Water; Ground
Water Treatment; O&M; Offsite Discharge;
Offsite Treatment; Organics; PCBs; Plume
Management; Publicly Owned Treatment Works;
RCRA; Soil; VOCs.
HASTINGS GROUND WATER
CONTAMINATION, NE
First Remedial Action
September 26, 1989
The Hastings Ground Water Contamination site
is a contaminated aquifer in the vicinity of the
city of Hastings, Adams County, Nebraska. The
site consists of several source areas, referred to
as subsites, contaminated with various chlorinated
volatile industrial chemicals. This ROD addresses
the Well Number 3 subsite which consists of a
ground water plume contaminated with carbon
tetrachloride emanating from a former grain
storage facility. The State first identified volatile
organic contamination in Well Number 3 in 1983.
Between 1986 and 1989 EPA conducted a field
investigation which identified the grain storage
area as the source of ground water contamination
probably resulting from accidental spills of liquid
fumigants used during grain storage. This interim
source control operable unit was developed to
reduce the migration and volume of volatile
contaminants present in the soil. The primary
contaminants of concern in the soil which impact
the ground water are VOCs including carbon
tetrachloride and chloroform.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
utilization of in-situ soil vapor extraction to
remove approximately 400 pounds of VOCs from
the soil; treatment of vapor emissions by a vapor
phase granular activated carbon system; and
replacement of spent granulated activated carbon
filters followed by offeite disposal at an approved
treatment facility for regeneration or incineration.
The estimated capital cost for this remedial action
is $874,000 with an annual O&M cost of
$154,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
This interim source control action is not designed
to restore the aquifer to drinking water standards;
therefore, no cleanup levels have been established
for ground water at this time. Cleanup
effectiveness will be based on the volume of
volatile contaminants recovered from the soil. It
is estimated that the soil vapor extraction method
will recover approximately 400 pounds of VOCs.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
124
-------
KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Ground Water Monitoring;
Incineration/Thermal Destruction; Interim
Remedy; O&M; Onsite Treatment; RCRA; Soil;
Treatment Technology; VOCs.
JOHNS' SLUDGE POND, KS
First Remedial Action - Final
September 22, 1989
The Johns' Sludge Pond site is in a relatively
undeveloped area in the city of Wichita, Sedgwick
County, Kansas. The 0.5-acre site, which lies
within the 500-year floodplain of the nearby Little
Arkansas River, neighbors a large rail yard, an
interstate highway, a large borrow pit, and farm
land. The city of Wichita owns approximately 1/3
of the site as a result of condemnation for
highway drainage. During the 1950s and 1960s
the Super Refined Oil Company used the sludge
pond for the disposal of waste oil and up to
15,000 cubic yards of oily sludge generated by the
oil recycling and reclamation operation. Because
sulfuric acid was used to refine waste oil for
recycling, the wastes dumped into the pond were
very acidic. Additionally, high lead concentrations
and low PCB concentrations (less than 50 ppm)
were also detected in the sludge. As surface
water flowed into the pond, an extremely acidic
layer of water formed on top of the sludge which
often overflowed into nearby surface waters. The
city subsequently built berms to prevent further
surface runoff. In 1983 EPA ordered the city to
undertake interim cleanup activities which
consisted of excavating and solidifying the sludge
using cement kiln dust with redeposition of the
treated sludge into a compacted clay-lined cell
followed by capping using a compacted clay cap.
Surface and ground water monitoring following
the interim action have not detected any
contaminant levels that would r quire further
action.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
a no further action scenario. Previous interim
remedial activities were adequate to protect
human health and the environment. There are
no additional costs associated with this no action
remedy. The city will continue to provide
post-closure maintenance. The county will
continue to provide post-closure monitoring.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Land use controls, including deed restrictions,
have been instituted preventing or controlling
future site uses which could damage the
effectiveness of the remedy.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Floodplain; Municipally Owned
Site (partially); No Action Remedy.
KEM-PEST LABORATORIES, MO
First Remedial Action
September 29, 1989
The Kern-Pest Laboratories site is a former
pesticide manufacturing facility approximately
3-miles northeast of Cape Girardeau, Cape
Girardeau County, Missouri. This 6-acre site is
in a rural area devoted primarily to agricultural
activities. Contamination at the site resulted
from the manufacturing of pesticide products
from 1965 until 1977. Production activities took
place in an onsite concrete block formulation
building. Sewage and plant wastes were disposed
of in an onsite lagoon which was backfilled with
clay in 1981. EPA investigations beginning in
1981 have identified pesticide and volatile and
semi-volatile organic contamination in soil,
sediment in drainage channels, and
-------
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Contaminated soil and sediment will be excavated
down to a level consistent with a 10'5 cancer-risk
level Chemical-specific goals were provided for
ten pesticides and for arsenic.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS; Arsenic, Clean Closure; Direct
Contact; Excavation; Metals; Offsite Disposal;
Organics; Pesticides; RCRA; Sediment; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations; VOCs; Xylenes.
SOLID STATE CIRCUITS, MO
First Remedial Action - Final
September 27, 1989
The Solid State Circuits (SSC) site, a former
industrial and manufacturing facility, is in
Republic, Missouri, approximately twelve miles
southwest of Springfield. The approximately
1/2-acre site has residential areas to the east,
west, and south, and light industry and
warehousing to the north and south. The city of
Republic obtains its drinking water from three
municipal wells (2,3, and 4) which draw from the
deepest of three underlying aquifers. The site
currently consists of a former manufacturing
building, two air strippers, and an excavated yard
area (from prior removal actions). Uses of the
facility since 1902 included milling, refrigeration,
printed circuit board manufacturing, and
photoprocessing, as well as other unknown
activities. The major wastes generated appear to
have been cleaning solvents used in the circuit
board process and wastewaters from the circuit
board activities. Sampling by the State in 1982
revealed contamination with TCE in Municipal
Well Number 1, 500 feet south of the site. The
SSC site was identified as a possible source.
Subsequent actions by EPA, the State, SSC, and
the city included pumping tests, several major soil
and debris excavations and removals (thereby
eliminating the source of contamination), and
taking Municipal Well Number 1 out of service.
This ROD addresses the ground water
contamination found in all three aquifers.
Contamination was found in the ground water,
water in utilities, and air. The primary
contaminants of concern are VOCs, particularly
TCE.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
ground water pumping and onsite treatment using
existing air strippers, discharging the treated water
to a POTW, plume control via pumping, and
BACT (as required) for air emissions; and air and
water monitoring. The estimated present worth
cost for this remedial action is $4,629,000, which
includes an annual O&M cost of $445,300.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The target for the ground water extraction
process is a 10"* cancer risk and hazard indices
ratio of less than 1. All ground water with a
TCE level exceeding 5 ug/1 will be remediated at
a POTW. Ground water with TCE levels above
the POTW pretreatment standard of 200 ug/1 will
be treated in the onsite air strippers before
discharge to the POTW. The POTW must meet
the State NPDES average monthly discharge limit
of TCE 2 ug/1.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: City
ordinances will prevent new drinking well
construction in or near the plume to prevent
ingestion of contaminated water.
KEYWORDS: Air Monitoring; Air Stripping;
Clean Air Act; Direct Contact; Drinking Water
Contaminants; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Institutional Controls; MCLs; Offsite Discharge;
O&M; Onsite Treatment; Plume Management;
POTW; Safe Drinking Water Act; Solvents; State
Permit; State Standards/ Regulations; Surface
Water Monitoring; TCE; VOCs.
TODTZ, LAWRENCE FARM, IA
First Remedial Action - Final
November 4, 1988
The 2.7-acre Dupont Impoundment at the Todtz
Farm site is part of the 12-acre parcel of land
known as the Todtz Farm Landfill, which is
located on a 120-acre farm 1.25 miles west of
Camanche, Iowa. Originally a sand and gravel
mine, the landfill received municipal waste from
1969 to 1975. In 1971, Dupont constructed the
impoundment in the northwest corner of the
landfill and disposed of an estimated 4,300 tons
of wet end cellophane process wastes from 1971
until its closure in 1975. Impoundment wastes
126
-------
are periodically in direct contact with the ground
water beneath the site, which flows southeasterly
toward the Mississippi River. Domestic wells and
the municipal water supply wells for Camanche
located downgradient of the site may be affected
by contamination from the site. In addition,
several ponds and lakes in the vicinity are
potential receptors for contaminated runoff and
recharge. The primary contaminants of concern
affecting the ground water are VOCs including
toluene, carbon disulflde, tetrahydrofuran, and
benzene; and metals including arsenic, lead, and
chromium.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
installation of a soil cover over the Dupont
Impoundment; implementation of institutional
controls including deed and land use restrictions;
provision of an alternate water supply for an
affected residence by relocating an existing well;
and ground water monitoring. EPA has
determined that further remedial actions will be
immediately implemented if ground water trigger
levels provided in the ROD are met or exceeded.
If ground water monitoring indicates that
contaminant levels exceed the less stringent
chemical-specific action levels provided in the
ROD, ground water pumping and treatment will
be implemented; if the more stringent action
levels are exceeded, a treatability study of the
impoundment waste will be conducted and either
a permanent treatment remedy of the
impoundment material or a cap and slurry wall
containment system will be implemented. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $1,030,000 with present worth O&M cost
of $510,000. If trigger levels are met or exceeded,
the estimated present worth cost of the remedy
would be $2,500,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Not applicable unless chemical-specific action
levels (based on MCLs) provided in the ROD are
exceeded in ground water monitoring wells.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed and land
use restrictions will be implemented to prevent
the sale and future development of the site
without further remedial action or consideration
of impacts to public health and the environment.
Access restrictions will include fencing.
KEYWORDS: Alternate Water Supply; Arsenic;
Benzene; Chromium; Direct Contact; Ground
Water; Ground Water Monitoring; Institutional
Controls; Lead; MCLs: Metals; O&M; Organics;
RCRA; State Regulations/Standards; Toluene;
VOCs.
VOGEL PAINT & WAX, IA
First Remedial Action - Final
September 20, 1989
The Vogel Paint & Wax (VPW) site is a two-acre
disposal area two miles southwest of the town of
Maurice, in Sioux County, Iowa. Adjacent land
uses are primarily agricultural; however, several
private residences are within one-quarter mile of
the site. An intermittent stream flows through
the site and discharges to the West Branch Floyd
River one mile away. A surficial sand and gravel
aquifer underlies the site and supplies nearby
private wells and the Southern Sioux County
Rural Water System, located a mile and one half
southeast of the site. Paint sludge, resins,
solvents, and other paint manufacturing wastes
were disposed of at the site between 1971 and
1979. The disposal area is on two acres of an
80-acre tract owned by VPW. Liquid wastes were
poured into trenches along with filled or partially
filled drums and other debris and capped with
one to two feet of soil. VPW records indicate
that approximately 43,000 gallons of aliphatic and
aromatic hydrocarbons and 6,000 pounds of
metals waste were buried at the site. The
disposal area was covered with clay in 1984. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the soil
and ground water are VOCs including benzene,
toluene, and xylenes; and metals including
chromium and lead.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
excavation of contaminated soil and separation of
solid and liquid wastes; onsite bioremediation of
3,000 cubic yards of the contaminated soil in a
fully contained surface impoundment unit, or
onsite thermal treatment if soil contains high
metal content; stabilization of treated soil, if
necessary to prevent leaching of metals, followed
by disposal in the excavated area; offsite
incineration, recycling or disposal of solid and
liquid wastes; recycling of leachate and offsite
treatment at POTW of excess leachate; ground
127
-------
water pumping and treatment using air stripping
with discharge of treated water to a nearby
stream; and ground water and air monitoring.
VOC emissions to the atmosphere from both the
soil and ground water cleanup actions will be
controlled by carbon adsorption, if necessary.
The estimated present worth cost for this
remedial action is $1,851,000 which includes an
annual O&M cost of $54,600.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil treatment will achieve leaching standards and
ground water will be treated to health-based
levels. Ground water cleanup goals are based on
SDWA MCLs/MCLGs or State action levels.
Specific ground water cleanup levels include
benzene 0.001 mg/1 (State), toluene 2.0 mg/1
(MCLG), xylenes 10.0 mg/1 (MCLG), chromium
0.10 mg/1 (MCL), and lead 0.005 mg/1 (MCLG).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Benzene;
Biodegradation; Carbon Adsorption (GAC);
Carcinogenic Compounds; Chromium; Clean Air
Act; Clean Water Act; Decontamination; Direct
Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants;
Excavation; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment; Leachate
Collection/Treatment; Leachability Tests; Lead;
Metals; MCLs; MCLGs; O&M; Offeite Discharge;
Offsite Treatment; Onsite Disposal; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; Publicly Owned Treatment
Works (POTW); RCRA; Safe Drinking Water
Act; State Standards/Regulations; Soil;
Solidification/Stabilization; Solvents; Toluene;
Treatability Studies; Treatment Technology;
VOCs; Water Quality Criteria; Xylenes.
128
-------
RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
REGION VIE
(Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming)
BURLINGTON NORTHERN
(SOMERS PLANT), MT
First Remedial Action - Final
September 27, 1989
The 80-acre Burlington Northern (Somers Plant)
site is a former railroad tie treatment facility in
Somers, Flathead County, Montana. Residential
areas border the site on three sides and wetlands
are located along Flathead Lake, 1,200 feet to the
east, and in a slough area adjacent to the plant.
Flathead Lake is currently the source of the
Somers municipal drinking water supply.
Burlington Northern operated the treatment plant
from 1901 to 1986 and generated wastewater
primarily consisting of stream condensate
containing zinc chloride and creosote, which was
discharged to a lagoon south of the treatment
building. Overflow from the lagoon flowed
through an open drainage ditch to a pond which
formed in a swamp area adjacent to the ditch,
and eventually into the lake. Contaminated soil
and sediment areas in addition to the drainage
ditch, swamp pond, and lagoon include a drippage
area along the railroad tracks where treated ties
were removed from the treatment building, a
slough area where treated ties were stored, and a
beach area extending into Flathead Lake.
Ground water in the vicinity of the lagoon and
the swamp pond is also contaminated. In May
1985 EPA performed an emergency removal
action and removed approximately 3,000 cubic
yards of contaminated soil and 100,000 gallons of
contaminated water from the swamp pond and
drainage ditch areas. The excavated areas were
backfilled and covered, and excavated soil was
transferred to an offsite RCRA-regulated facility
to await treatment. Contaminated water was
treated onsite to recover usable materials. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
soil, sediment, and ground water are organics
including creosote constituents such as PAHs and
phenols, and metals including zinc.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
excavation and onsite biological treatment of
11,700 cubic yards of contaminated soil and
sediment from all source areas except the beach
area; onsite restoration or replacement of
wetlands areas; installation and operation of an
innovative hot water flushing system and a water
treatment system using ozone/uv or peroxide/uv in
the lagoon and swamp pond areas to treat
creosote contaminated ground water, and in-situ
biological treatment to degrade residual
contaminants in the ground water and
contaminants adsorbed onto the aquifer matrix;
ground water will be reinjected or discharged to
a POTW; ground water monitoring; and
implementation of temporary institutional controls
to restrict ground water use. The original
estimated total present worth cost for this
remedial action was $12,031,000, which included
an annual O&M cost of $661,000 for years 1-2,
$811,000 for years 3-10, and $72,000 for years
11-30. This present worth cost included
remediation of beach sediment. Under the
selected action, beach sediment are left in place.
Reducing this cost by a volume ratio gives a
current estimated present worth cost of
approximately $11,000,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil exceeding concentrations of cPAHs 3.6
mg/kg, total PAHs 1,875 mg/kg, zinc 15,750
mg/kg, or total phenols 3,000 mg/kg will be
excavated. The established excavation levels for
total cPAHs in soil is based on a 10'5 risk level.
The initial soil treatment goal is based on a 10"4
risk level and will be achieved by reducing total
cPAHs to 36 mg/kg (BOAT level). Treatment
will be continued until the decrease in total
PAHs has been less than 20 percent per year or
background levels have been reached. The goal
of the continued treatment is a risk level of 10"*.
Chemical-specific ground water cleanup goals are
based on the risk assessment, CWA water quality
criteria, and SDWA MCLs and include cPAHs
129
-------
0.03 ug/I (WQC), total PAHs 0.30 ug/1 (1Q-5
risk-based level), phenol 2,500 ug/l (WQC),
benzene 5 ug/1 (MCL), and zinc 110 ug/1 (WQC).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls will be designed to prohibit construction
of new wells downgradient from the contaminated
aquifer until ground water quality returns to
acceptable levels.
KEYWORDS; Biodegradation; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Water Act; Direct Contact;
Excavation; Floodplain; Ground Water; Ground
Water Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Institutional Controls; MCLs; Metals; Onsite
Discharge; Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment;
O&M; Organics; PAHs; Phenols; Plume
Management; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act;
Sediment; Soil; State Standards/Regulations;
Treatability Studies; Treatment Technology;
Wetlands.
OBBY GROUND WATER CONTAMINATION, MT
Second Remedial Action
December 30, 1988
The Libby Ground Water Contamination site
(also known as the Champion Mill site or the
Libby Pesticide site) is on the Champion
International Corporation lumber and plywood
mill in the city of Libby, Lincoln County,
Montana. Champion is the third owner of the
facility, which has been in operation since 1946.
The area around the site includes residential areas
and businesses. The site is bordered on the west
by Flower Creek, on the east by Libby Creek, and
on the north by the Kootenai River. The city
and surrounding areas have a population of
approximately 11,000. The contaminated
soil/source area is within the confines of the
facility; however, ground water contamination
extends well into the city of Libby. Wood
treating fluids and their constituents, including
creosote and PCP, are the contaminants of
concern at the site. They are found in soil and
sediment at several different locations, including
former waste pits, tank storage areas, and butt dip
and treatment sites. The contamination is the
result of spent fluids, overflow of treatment tanks,
and spills. In addition to creosote and PCP,
certain carrier fuels or oils were used at the site
and contributed VOC contaminants.
Investigations at the site were initiated by the
State in 1979 after a residential well was found to
smell of creosote. A ROD signed in September
1986 included a provision for an alternate water
supply to residents whose wells were
contaminated. The site has been divided into
three operable units; however, they require
concurrent remediation. The operable units are
the soil/source area within the confines of the
facility; the upper aquifer, historically used for
drinking water and irrigation but currently
severely contaminated; and the lower aquifer,
highly contaminated with oil and non-aqueous
phase liquids (NAPL). The primary contaminants
of concern affecting the soil, sediment, and
ground water at the site are VOCs including
benzene; other organics including dioxin, PAHs
(creosote constituents), and PCP; metals including
arsenic; and oil.
The selected remedial actions for this site have
been developed based on operable units. The
selected remedial action for the soil/source area
includes excavation and consolidation of
approximately 30,000 cubic yards of unsaturated
soil and debris in the waste pit area, followed by
a two-step enhanced biodegradation process
composed of enhanced natural biodegradation and
subsequent transfer to a land treatment unit
consisting of a 3.5-acre lined treatment cell for
land farming and final deposition; in-situ
bioremediation treatment of saturated soil in the
waste disposal pit using a closed loop system
involving ground water pumping and physical
treatment in a fixed-bed bioreactor with
reinjection through a rock percolation bed, and
in-situ biodegradation stimulation to prevent
further leaching of source material to ground
water (recovered NAPLs will be processed in an
oil/water separation and stored onsite for
recycling and incineration); and capping of the
waste pit, butt dip, and tank farm areas. The
selected remedial action for the upper aquifer
includes in-situ ground water bioremediation of
the upper aquifer that is separate from the
process used in the saturated zone of the waste
pit area. The selected remedial action for the
lower aquifer includes implementation of a pilot
test for the oil-contaminated lower aquifer using
biorestoration in conjunction with oil recovery
130
-------
and oil dispersion techniques (this is an interim
remedy for the lower aquifer); implementation of
institutional controls including deed, land use, and
ground water restrictions; and onsite ground water
monitoring. The estimated present worth cost of
this remedial action is $5,777,000 with annual
O&M costs of $670,200 for year 2, $521,200 for
years 3-5, $232,200 for years 6-8, and $80,000 for
years 9-30.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Treatment of soil and debris will attain a total
cPAHs level of 88 mg/kg based on a 10~5 risk
level; napthalene 8.0 mg/kg, phenanthrene 8.0
mg/kg, pyrene 7.3 mg/kg, and PCP 37.0 mg/kg all
based on best demonstrated available technology
(BDAT) concentrations; and combined chlorinated
dibenzo dioxins and dibenzo furans 0.001 mg/kg.
Saturated zone (i.e., ground water below the
waste pit area) and upper aquifer ground water
treatment will attain total noncarcinogenic PAHs
400 ng/1, total cPAHs 40 ng/1, PCP 1.05 mg/1,
benzene 5 ug/l (MCL), and arsenic 50 ug/1
(MCL). Other organics/inorganics are not to
exceed a 10"5 risk level. Treatment levels were
not provided for the lower aquifer because an
interim remedy is being used; therefore, an
ARAR waiver is applicable.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Remedy will
implement deed, land use, and ground water use
restrictions to prevent sale without
acknowledgement of onsite hazardous wastes,
future development, and the drilling of drinking
water wells.
KEYWORDS: ARAR Waiver; Arsenic; Benzene;
Biodegradation/Land Application; Capping;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Water Act;
Closure Requirements; Debris; Dioxin; Direct
Contact; Drinking Water Supply; Excavation;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; istitutional Controls;
Interim Remedy; MCLs; Metals; O&M; Oils;
Onsite Containment; Onsite Discharge; Onsite
Disposal; Onsite Treatment; Organics; PAHs;
Plume Management; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water
Act; Sediment; Soil; State Standards/Regulations;
Temporary Storage; Treatability Studies;
Treatment Technology; VOCs.
MONTICELLO VICINITY PROPERTIES, UT
First Remedial Action - Final
September 29, 1989
The Monticello Vicinity Properties site, also
known as the Monticello Radiation Contaminated
Properties, is a federally owned, abandoned
vanadium and uranium mill area in the city of
Monticello, San Juan County, Utah. Land use in
the area is residential, however, there is limited
commercial use as well. Milling of vanadium and
uranium occurred from 1944 to 1960.
Throughout the operating period, mill tailings
were used in the city of Monticello for
construction purposes, including fill for open
lands; backfill around water, sewer, and electrical
lines; sub-base for driveways, sidewalks, and
concrete slabs; backfill against basement
foundations; and as sand mix in concrete, plaster,
and mortar. Currently, the site consists of a
dismantled vanadium and uranium mill, and
stabilized mill tailings piles. The Monticello
Radiation Contaminated Properties were accepted
into the Department of Energy's Surplus Facilities
Management Program in 1980 for remedial action.
The Vicinity Properties were formally included on
the NPL in 1986 and, therefore, must comply
with requirements of CERCLA. In October 1989
the millsite itself was also listed on the NPL.
DOE established an official list of Vicinity
Properties designated for remedial action based
on radiological surveys conducted from 1971 to
1984. As of March 1989, 91 properties had been
identified to be included in the Monticello
Vicinity Properties. Of these 91 properties, 53
remedial actions have been completed and 12
additional properties are slated for remedial
action in 1989. Approximately 100,000 cubic
yards (135,000 tons) of contaminated construction
debris and wind blown deposited contamination is
estimated to be within the Vicinity Properties.
The primary contaminants of concern in
construction material and debris are thorium230,
radium226, and radon222 contained in the vanadium
and uranium mill tailings.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
excavation and removal of residual radioactive
material from affected properties and
restoration/reconstruction using clean materials, or
131
-------
modification of existing structures to isolate
radiation sources from inhabitants; filling and
regrading excavated areas; and disposal and
temporary storage of all contaminated material at
the Monticello Millsite. The millsite is addressed
separately under a 1988 Federal Facilities
Inter-agency Agreement. The estimated average
cost of this remedial action is $65,000 per
Vicinity Property for 91 "included' properties, or
55,915,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Cleanup will ensure that the concentration of
radiunr2* in land averaged over 100 square meters
shall not exceed the background level of 2 pCi/g
by more than 5 pCi/g averaged over the first 15
cm of soil or 15 pCi/g averaged over 15 cm thick
layers of soil more than 15 cm below the surface.
In addition, in an occupied or habitable building
the level of gamma radiation shall not exceed
background by more than 20 microroentgens per
hour. These goals are based on the Uranium
Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Debris; Direct Contact;
Excavation; Filling; Metals; Mining Wastes;
Onsite Containment; Radioactive Materials; Soil;
State Standards/Regulations; Treatment
Technology.
SAND CREEK INDUSTRIAL, CO
First Remedial Action
September 29, 1989
The Sand Creek Industrial site is in Commerce
City, Adams County, Colorado. Land use in the
vicinity of the site is industrial with users
including trucking firms, petroleum and chemical
production and supply companies, small
businesses and several residences. The site
contains the property and buildings of the
Colorado Organic Chemical Company (COC) and
approximately 13 residences. Production wells
north and downgradient of the study area are the
source of water supply to the county. Pesticide
manufacturing operations began at COC in the
1960s. Fires in 1968 and 1977 and improper
pesticide storage practices resulted in high levels
of organiphosphate pesticides, chlorinated
hydrocarbons, and thermally-altered pesticides
being released at the site. In 1978 COC removed
some contaminated soil, and in 1984 COC
removed drums of waste, excess product, and
contaminated soil, and installed fencing at the site
in response to an EPA order. This Record of
Decision represents the first of five planned
operable units for the site and addresses soil,
buildings, and tanks contaminated by pesticides,
volatile organics, and metals. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil, onsite
buildings, and tanks are VOCs including TCE and
PCE; and other organics including pesticides.
The selected remedial action for the site includes
in-situ vacuum extraction to remove VOCs from
contaminated soil and onsite treatment of off-gas
by air stripping; excavation and offsite
incineration of approximately 1,000 cubic yards of
soil contaminated with greater than 1000 mg/kg
halogenated organic compounds (HOC), with
offsite residual disposal in a RCRA landfill;
backfilling of excavated areas with clean soil;
demolition and offsite disposal of buildings in
conformance with land disposal regulations; and
ground water monitoring at the site for 30 years
following remediation. The estimated present
worth cost for the selected remedy is $5,349,600.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Acceptable site-specific soil concentrations (action
levels) were calculated for VOCs using a
soil-water leaching model which assumed ground
water concentrations corresponding to SDWA
MCLs or a 10"* cancer risk level. Chemical-
specific cleanup levels were provided for PCE
1,095 ug/kg and TCE 285 ug/kg. ARARs specify
the cleanup objectives for the pesticide 2, 4-D, a
HOC. LDRs have established treatment of
HOCs >. 1,000 mg/kg based on BOAT, which for
2,4-D is incineration.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Clean Closure;
Clean Water Act; Closure Requirements; Debris;
Direct Contact; Excavation; Filling; Ground
Water Monitoring; Incineration/Thermal
Treatment; MCLs; Offsite Disposal; Offsite
Treatment; Onsite Treatment; Organics; PCE;
132
-------
Pesticides; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil;
State Standards/Regulations; TCE; Treatment
Technology; Vacuum Extraction; VOCs.
WOODBURY CHEMICAL, CO
Second Remedial Action - Final
September 29, 1989
The Woodbury Chemical site is in Commerce
City, a northern suburb of Denver, Colorado, and
neighbors a primarily industrial area which
includes automobile salvage yards and a
petroleum refinery. From the 1950s to 1971, the
Woodbury Chemical Company operated a
pesticide formulation facility which was destroyed
by fire in 1965 but was subsequently rebuilt.
Contaminated rubble and debris from the fire
were disposed of on a 2.2-acf e vacant lot east of
the Woodbury facility. During a 1985 remedial
investigation of the 2.2-acre lot, EPA identified
high levels of pesticides and metals in surface and
subsurface soil. Although EPA issued a ROD
later that year, site cleanup was delayed due to
the discovery of significant additional
contamination at the Woodbury facility and
adjacent properties to the west and north of the
facility. As a result of the discovery of additional
contamination, EPA determined it would be more
cost effective to simultaneously implement the
cleanup activities at the 2.2-acre lot, the
Woodbury chemical facility, and adjacent
properties. The selected remedial action
addressed in this ROD incorporates and builds
upon the 1985 ROD. The primary contaminants
of concern affecting -the soil are VOCs including
PCE and TCE; other organics including
pesticides; and metals including arsenic.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
excavation and offsite incineration of 850 cubic
yards of highly-contaminated soil followed by
offsite disposal; excavation and offsite disposal of
11,520 cubic yards of less-contaminated soil at a
RCRA-permitted landfill; and backfilling and
revegetating the excavated area. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action is
$6,962,600 which includes an annual O&M cost of
$31,400.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil cleanup will attain an excess lifetime cancer
risk of 10"*. Specific cleanup goals are based on
ARARs and background levels and include
arsenic 5-10 mg/kg, TCE 0.52 mg/kg, and PCE
1.9 mg/kg.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Arsenic; Clean Air Act; Direct
Contact; Excavation; Filling; Incineration/
Thermal Destruction; Metals; Offsite Disposal;
Offsite Treatment; O&M; Organics; PCE;
Pesticides; RCRA; Soil; State Standards/
Regulations; TCE; Treatment Technology; VOCs.
133
-------
RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
REGION IX
(American Samoa, Arizona, California, Guam, Hawaii,
Nevada, Trust Territories)
ATLAS ASBESTOS MINE, CA
First Remedial Action
July 19, 1989
The Atlas Asbestos Mine site is in Fresno
County, California, and is being remediated
concurrently with the Coalinga Asbestos Mine
site. This ROD does not address the mines, but
rather a separate area in the city of Coalinga,
where asbestos, from the Atlas-Coalinga mines,
was deposited to await handling and shipment.
This 107-acre site has been designated as the first
operable unit for the Atlas Asbestos Mine and
the Coalinga Asbestos Mine sites. From the
1960s to the mid-1970s extensive asbestos mining
and milling took place in areas near the site, and
until 1980 the site operated as an asbestos
milling, manufacturing, storage, and transportation
center. The site consists of four distinct areas:
(1) the warehouse which was once a mining waste
distribution center and which currently houses
1,600 cubic yards of mining waste; (2) a storage
yard which contains asbestos- contaminated
stacked pipes; (3) a shipping yard which was used
as an asbestos distribution center by the Atlas
Asbestos Company; and (4) the U.S. Asbestos
Company which currently stores piles of
asbestos-contaminated mining waste. In 1980 a
State inspection revealed elevated levels of
asbestos in the nearby aqueduct, which suggested
that the Atlas Asbestos Mine and Coalinga
Asbestos Mine sites were probable asbestos
sources. Subsequent sampling programs,
conducted between 1983 and 1987, revealed that
surface water and air also contained elevated
levels of asbestos. As a result of these findings,
EPA issued an Administrative Order to a major
landowner, Southern Pacific Transportation
Company (SPTC), requiring SPTC to conduct an
additional remedial investigation and a feasibility
study and to perform interim measures to
stabilize the site. Because airborne emissions of
asbestos pose the greatest threat to neighboring
residents, this remedial response will limit the
amount of asbestos and nickel released from the
soil and emitted into the air. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil and
debris are metals including nickel, and other
inorganics including asbestos and mining wastes.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
excavating and consolidating 14,500 cubic yards of
asbestos, chromium, and nickel-contaminated soil
and building debris; constructing an underground
waste management unit (WMU) to contain and
dispose of contaminated soil and waste onsite;
capping the WMU area; regrading the excavated
area; decontaminating debris; monitoring soil
moisture content, ground water, air, and
personnel; and implementing institutional
controls. The estimated present worth cost for
this action ranges between $1,500,000 to
$2,500,000, which includes annual O&M costs of
$35,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
All contaminated soil and mining wastes will be
cleaned to, or below, background levels for nickel,
and to, or below, one area percent asbestos using
polarized light microscopy.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed
restrictions will be implemented to prevent
disturbing the cap and to prevent releasing
asbestos fibers or nickel contaminants into the
air.
KEYWORDS; Air Monitoring; Asbestos;
Capping; Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Air
Act; Debris; Decontamination; Excavation;
Ground Water Monitoring; Inorganics;
Institutional Controls; Metals; Mining Wastes;
O&M; Onsite Containment; Onsite Disposal; Soil;
State Standards/Regulations; Toxic Substances
Control Act.
134
-------
BECKMAN INSTRUMENTS (PORTERVILLE), CA
First Remedial Action - Final
September 26, 1989
The Beckman Instruments (Porterville) site, which
includes the Beckman plant and surrounding
study area, is in the city of Porterville, California.
The 12-acre Beckman plant has manufactured
electronic instrument assemblies and circuit
boards since 1967. Wastewater from industrial
processes, including electroplating and degreasing,
contains spent halogenated solvents, inorganic and
acidic solutions, salts, metal-laden solutions, and
plating bath sludges. From 1974 to 1983,
wastewater was discharged to an onsite solar
evaporation pond; however, since 1983,
wastewater has been treated onsite. Ground
water in the vicinity of the pond was used for
domestic and agricultural purposes until 1983
when ground water was found to be
contaminated. Beckman subsequently closed the
pond, provided alternate water supplies to
approximately 300 residents in the area, and
began ground water pumping and treatment using
air stripping in 1985. Additionally, soil beneath
the former pond, as well as near a former
pesticide operation area, are known to be
contaminated with elevated levels of lead. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the soil
and ground water are VOCs including TCE and
metals including lead.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
excavation and offsite disposal of
lead-contaminated soil; continued operation of
the ground water pumping and treatment system
for the upper aquifer; pumping and treatment of
ground water from upper aquitard and lower
aquifer using air stripping; offsite discharge of all
treated water into infiltration basins or irrigation
canals; and ground water monitoring. The
estimated present worth cost for the selected
remedy is $4,740,000. This estimate does not
include costs for continued operation of the
existing pumping and treatment system.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Soil contaminated with lead above 200 mg/kg will
be excavated and disposed of offsite. Ground
water cleanup will attain State or Federal MCLs
or State action levels. Chemical-specific ground
water cleanup goals include TCE 5 ug/1 (MCL).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Direct Contact; Floodplain; Ground
Water; Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; Lead; MCLs; Metals; Offsite Disposal;
Offsite Discharge; O&M; Onsite Treatment;
RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; VOCs.
COALINGA ASBESTOS MINE, CA
First Remedial Action
July 19, 1989
The Coalinga Asbestos Mine site is in Fresno
County, California, and is being remediated
concurrently with the Atlas Asbestos Mine site.
This ROD does not address the mines, but rather
a separate area in the city of Coalinga, where
asbestos, from the Atlas-Coalinga mines, was
deposited to await handling and shipping. This
107-acre site has been designated as the first
operable unit for the Atlas Asbestos Mine and
the Coalinga Asbestos Mine sites. From the
1960s to the mid-1970s extensive asbestos mining
and milling took place in areas near the site, and
until 1980 the site operated as an asbestos
milling, manufacturing, storage, and transportation
center. The site consists of four distinct areas:
(1) the warehouse which was once a mining waste
distribution center and which currently houses
1,600 cubic yards of mining waste; (2) a storage
yard which contains asbestos-contaminated stacked
pipes; (3) a shipping yard which was used as an
asbestos distribution center by the Coalinga
Asbestos Company; and (4) the U.S. Coalinga
Company which currently stores piles of asbestos-
contaminated mining waste. In 1980 a State
inspection revealed elevated levels of asbestos in
the nearby aqueduct which suggested that the
Coalinga Asbestos Mine and Atlas Asbestos Mine
sites were probable asbestos sources. Subsequent
sampling programs, conducted between 1983 and
1987, revealed that surface water and air also
contained elevated levels of asbestos. As a result
of these findings, EPA issued an Administrative
Order to a major landowner, Southern Pacific
Transportation Company (SPTC), requiring SPTC
to conduct an additional remedial investigation
and a feasibility study and to perform interim
measures to stabilize the site. Because airborne
135
-------
emissions of asbestos pose the greatest threat to
neighboring residents, this remedial response will
limit the amount of asbestos and nickel released
from the soil and emitted into the air. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the soil
and debris are metals including nickel, and other
inorganics including asbestos and mining wastes.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
excavating and consolidating 14,500 cubic yards of
asbestos, chromium, and nickel-contaminated soil
and building debris; constructing an underground
waste management unit (WMU) to contain and
dispose of contaminated soil and waste onsite;
capping the WMU area; regrading the excavated
area; decontaminating debris; monitoring soil
moisture content, ground water, air, and
personnel; and implementing institutional
controls. The estimated present worth cost for
this action ranges between $1,500,000 to
$2,500,000, which includes annual O&M costs of
S35,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
All contaminated soil and mining wastes will be
cleaned to, or below, background levels for nickel,
and to, or below, one area percent asbestos using
polarized light microscopy.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed
restrictions will be implemented to prevent
disturbing the cap and to prevent releasing
asbestos fibers or nickel contaminants into the
air.
KEYWORDS; Air Monitoring; Asbestos;
Capping; Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Air
Act; Debris; Decontamination; Excavation;
Ground Water Monitoring; Inorganics;
Institutional Controls; Metals; Mining Wastes;
O&M; Onsite Containment; Onsite Disposal; Soil;
State Standards/Regulations; Toxic Substances
Control Act.
COAST WOOD PRESERVING, CA
First Remedial Action - Final
September 29, 1989
The ROD was not available at the time of
printing; however, the ROD was included in
Exhibits 1-12, as appropriate, based on
information obtained from the Region.
FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR
(MT.VIEW), CA
First and Second Remedial Actions - Final
June 9,1989 - June 30,1989
The Fairchild Semiconductor (Mt. View) site is
one of three Superfund sites that are being
remediated concurrently. The other two sites are
Intel (Mountain View Plant) and Raytheon. The
sites are located in the Middlefield/ Ellis/Whisman
(MEW) Study Area in Santa Clara County in the
city of Mountain View, California. Land use in
the area is primarily light industrial and
commercial, with some residential areas. There
are no natural surface drainage features within or
surrounding the site; most of the runoff is
intercepted by a storm drain system and
discharged to an offsite creek. Various industrial
activities were conducted in the vicinity of the
site, including semiconductor manufacturing, metal
finishing operations, parts cleaning, aircraft
maintenance, and other activities requiring the
use, storage; and handling of a variety of
chemicals, particularly solvents. Site
investigations at several of these facilities during
1981 and 1982 revealed significant soil and
ground water contamination by toxic chemicals,
primarily VOCs. The primary cause of the
contamination was leaking storage tanks and lines,
and poor management practices. Before and
during additional site investigations, which were
conducted under a 1985 Consent Order, interim
cleanup activities were conducted at the site by
Fairchild, Intel, and Raytheon. These included
tank removals, soil removal and treatment, well
sealing, construction of slurry walls, and hydraulic
control and treatment of local ground water. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the site
are VOCs including TCE, TCA, PCE, toluene,
and xylenes, and other organics including phenols.
136
-------
The selected remedy for this site includes in-situ
vapor extraction with treatment by vapor phase
GAC of contaminated soil found within the
Fairchild and Raytheon slurry walls. There may
be some limited soil excavation and treatment by
aeration for some areas outside of the slurry
walls, with onsite disposal of residues in the
excavated area; ground water pumping and
treatment using air stripping, and in some cases
liquid phase GAC, with emissions controls
consisting of GAC vapor phase carbon units,
followed by reuse of the ground water (reuse
options including reinfection are being developed)
and, if necessary, discharge to surface water;
sealing of any conduits or potential conduits to
protect the deep aquifer; and ground water
monitoring. The present worth cost for this
remedial action is $49,000,000 to $56,000,000,
which includes O&M costs.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The cleanup goals for soil are based on ensuring
the success of the ground water cleanup goal
(attaining MCLs) in the shallow aquifers.
Individual goals include TCE 1 mg/kg inside the
slurry walls and TCE 0.05 mg/kg outside the
slurry walls. Ground water cleanup goals for the
shallow aquifers, which are not currently used for
drinking water, are based on MCLs and a 10"4 to
10'5 excess cancer risk and include TCE 5 ug/1
(MCL). Goals for the deep aquifers, which are
used for drinking water, are based on a 10"6
cumulative cancer risk and include TCE 0.8 ug/1.
Attainment of these levels will also assure
cleanup of other VOCs to at least their respective
MCLs.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Aeration; Air Monitoring; Air
Stripping; Carbon Adsorption (GAC);
Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Water Act;
Direct Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants;
Excavation; Filling; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment; MCLs;
O&M; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Disposal; Onsite
Treatment; Organics; PCE; Phenols; Safe
Drinking Water Act; Soil; Solvents; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; Toluene; Treatment
Technology; VOCs; Volatilization/Soil Aeration;
Xylenes.
FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR (S. SAN JOSE), CA
First Remedial Action - Final
March 20, 1989
The Fairchild Semiconductor (S. San Jose) site
is a former semiconductor manufacturing facility
in San Jose, California. Operations were
conducted at the site from April 1977 until it
closed in October 1983. In late 1981, Fairchild
Semiconductor Corporation discovered that an
underground organic solvent waste tank had
failed, resulting in soil and on- and offsite ground
water contamination by a mixture of solvents.
TCA contamination was discovered exceeding
drinking water standards in a public drinking
water supply well located approximately 1,800 feet
downgradient from the site. The well was
subsequently destroyed and sealed; however,
several wells remain active downgradient.
Fairchild has been investigating and cleaning up
soil and ground water pollution at the facility
since contamination was first detected in 1981.
Interim actions taken by Fairchild include source
removal and onsite soil cleanup (removal of
defective tank and excavation of 3,389 cubic yards
of contaminated soil), installation of a slurry wall
around the perimeter of the site, conducting pilot
studies for onsite aquifer flushing and in-situ soil
vapor extraction, hydraulic containment of the
plume with onsite and limited offsite ground
water treatment using air stripping, and
implementation of ground water conservation
measures. Although the interim cleanup actions
have significantly decreased the size and
contamination of the plume, some areas outside
the slurry wall still exceed State drinking water
action levels, and onsite soil and ground water
still contain high concentrations of chemicals.
This ROD provides a final remedy which
addresses onsite soil and ground water, and offsite
ground water contamination. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil and
ground water are VOCs including PCE, TCA,
DCE, and xylenes.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
onsite soil vapor extraction (aeration); onsite
shallow ground water, and offsite ground water
from well RW-25, pumping and treatment using
air stripping, followed by offsite reinjection of
treated ground water and discharge to surface
water after aquifer reuse capacity has been
137
-------
exhausted; deep ground water pumping followed
by discharge of untreated ground water to surface
water via storm drains; conducting laboratory and
field study of biodegradation of onsite chemicals;
implementing institutional controls including deed
restrictions to limit ground water and land use;
and ground water monitoring. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action is
$9393,100 which includes total O&M costs of
$7,231,700.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS;
The soil remediation goal is 1 mg/kg for VOCs
including PCE, TCA, and xylenes. This goal will
be re-evaluated based on treatability test results.
Offsite ground water will attain a hazard index of
0.25, which will be achieved by reducing DCE
concentrations to below detection (i.e.,
-------
(10-* risk level), PCE 0.7 ug/1 (10"6 risk level),
1,1-DCE 6.0 ug/1 (HI=1), toluene 20 ug/1 (HI=1),
and xylene 70 ug/I (HI=1).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Benzene; Carbon
Adsorption; Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Air
Act; Clean Water Act; Contingent Remedy;
Direct Contact; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment; O&M;
Offsite Discharge; Organics; PCE; Plume
Management; Solvents; State Permit; State
Standards/Regulations; TCE; VOCs; Xylenes.
IBM (SAN JOSE PLANT), CA
First Remedial Action - Final
December 15, 1988
International Business Machines (IBM) owns and
operates a data processing machine manufacturing
facility in the Santa Teresa Basin in San Jose,
California. IBM has operated the facility since
December 1956 using organic chemicals including
TCA, acetone, xylenes, and petroleum naphthas.
The organic chemicals have been handled and
stored onsite in drums, and aboveground and
underground tanks. In addition, waste organic
solvents were stored in concrete or steel
underground tanks or drums; however, the
concrete tanks were designed only to store
organic wastes. In October 1980, while excavating
tanks in Tank Farm No. 1, IBM discovered soil
contaminated with organics. Investigations in
November 1981 revealed extensive ground water
contamination. The ground water plume is more
than 3 miles long and more than 180 feet deep.
Fourteen active or potentially active water supply
wells are downgradient of the plume; however,
none of these public wells has been found to
contain VOCs above State and Federal drinking
water standards. Nineteen sources of soil and
ground water contamination have been identified,
including tank overflows, spillage from drum
handling, and tank and pipeline fitting failures.
Actions have been taken to prevent further
solvent migration from the IBM source areas,
including removing underground storage tanks
which were replaced with aboveground tanks, and
excavating more than 23,000 cubic yards of
contaminated soil. Interim remedial measures
begun in November 1982 to clean up the plume
have included off- and onsite ground water
pumping with discharge of untreated ground
water to storm drains. The primary contaminants
of concern affecting the soil and ground water are
VOCs including TCA, toluene, and xylenes, and
other organics.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
onsite soil vapor extraction; onsite shallow and
deep ground water, and offsite deep ground water,
pumping and treatment using air stripping,
followed by onsite discharge of treated ground
water to the aquifer and offsite discharge to
surface water after the reuse capacity of the
aquifer is exhausted. Remedial action costs for
this remedy were not provided.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The soil remediation goal is 1 mg/kg for all
contaminants of concern. Ground water
treatment goals were provided for contaminants
of concern in the upper and lower aquifers. The
chemical-specific goals for ground water are based
on State action levels, EPA reference doses, and
lifetime health advisories. Individual goals
include TCA 200 ug/1 (State), toluene 100 ug/1
(State), and xylenes 200 ug/1 (State) in the upper
aquifer zone, and a hazard index of 0.25 with
TCA 50 ug/1 in the deeper aquifer zones.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Water Act; Direct Contact;
Drinking Water Contaminants; Excavation;
Ground Water, Ground Water Treatment; Offsite
Discharge; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Treatment;
Organics; Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil;
Solvents; State Permit; State
Standards/Regulations; Toluene; Vacuum
Extraction, VOCs; Xylenes.
INTEL (MOUNTAIN VIEW PLANT), CA
First Remedial Action - Final
June 9, 1989
The Intel (Mountain View Plant) site is one of
three Superfund sites that are being remediated
concurrently. The other two sites are Fairchild
139
-------
Semiconductor (Mt. View) and Raytheon. The
sites are located in the Middlefield/Ellis/Whisman
(MEW) Study Area in Santa Clara County in the
city of Mountain View, California. Land use in
the area is primarily light industrial and
commercial, with some residential areas. There
are no natural surface drainage features within or
surrounding the site; most of the runoff is
intercepted by a storm drain system and
discharged to an offsite creek. Various industrial
activities were conducted in the vicinity of the
site, including semiconductor manufacturing, metal
finishing operations, parts cleaning, aircraft
maintenance, and other activities requiring the
use, storage, and handling of a variety of
chemicals, particularly solvents. Site
investigations at several of these facilities during
1981 and 1982 revealed significant soil and
ground water contamination by toxic chemicals,
primarily VOCs. The primary causes of the
contamination were leaking storage tanks and
lines, and poor management practices. Before
and during additional site investigations, which
were conducted under a 1985 Consent Order,
interim cleanup actions were conducted at the
site by Fairchild, Intel, and Raytheon. These
included tank removals, soil removal and
treatment, well sealing, construction of slurry
walls, and hydraulic control and treatment of local
ground water. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the site are VOCs including
TCE, TCA, PCE, toluene, and xylenes; and other
organics including phenols.
The selected remedy for this site includes in-situ
vapor extraction with treatment by vapor phase
GAC of contaminated soil found within the
Fairchild and Raytheon slurry walls. There may
be some limited soil excavation and treatment by
aeration for some areas outside of the slurry walls
with onsite disposal of residues in the excavated
area; ground water pumping and treatment using
air stripping, and in some cases liquid phase
GAC, with emissions controls consisting of GAC
vapor phase carbon units, followed by reuse of
the ground water (reuse options including
reinjection are being developed) and, if necessary,
discharge to surface water; sealing of any conduits
or potential conduits to protect the deep aquifer;
and ground water monitoring. The present worth
cost for this remedial action is $49,000,000 to
$56,000,000, which includes O&M costs.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The cleanup goals for soil are based on ensuring
the success of the ground water cleanup goal
(attaining MCLs) in the shallow aquifers.
Individual goals include TCE 1 mg/kg inside the
slurry walls and TCE 0.05 mg/kg outside the
slurry walls. Ground water cleanup goals for the
shallow aquifers, which are not currently used for
drinking water, are based on MCLs and a 10"4 to
10'5 excess cancer risk and include TCE 5 ug/1
(MCL). Goals for the deep aquifers, which are
used for drinking water, are based on a 10"*
cumulative cancer risk and include TCE 0.8 ug/1.
Attainment of these levels will also ensure
cleanup of other VOCs to at least their respective
MCLs.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Aeration; Air Monitoring; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Clean Water Act; Direct Contact; Drinking Water
Criteria; Excavation; Filling; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; MCLs; O&M; Onsite Discharge;
Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment; Organics;
PCE; Phenols; Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil;
Solvents; State Standards/Regulations; TCE;
Toluene; Treatment Technology; VOCs;
Volatilization/Soil Aeration; Xylenes.
KOPPERS (OROVILLE PLANT), CA
First Remedial Action - Final
September 13, 1989
The Koppers (Oroville Plant) site is a 200-acre
operating wood treating plant in Butte County,
California, just south of Oroville. The Site is
bordered on the west by a Louisiana-Pacific
Corporation facility, which is also a Superfund
site, and lies within the floodplain of the Feather
River, which runs 3,000 feet to the east. Land
use in the vicinity of the site is mixed agricultural,
residential, commercial, and industrial. Although
there is a history of wood treating operations at
the site, wood treating operations were greatly
expanded in 1955 when Koppers Company, Inc.
became the owner and operator. Chemical
preservatives including pentachlophenol (PCP),
creosote, and chlorinated copper arsenate solution
140
-------
have been used in the wood treating processes.
Wastewater discharge and other site activities
have resulted in contamination of unlined ponds,
soil, and debris. In 1971 PCP was detected in
onsite ground water and, in 1972, in residential
wells to the southwest. Pursuant to a State order,
Koppers conducted cleanup activities from 1973
to 1974, including ground water pumping and
discharging to spray fields and offsite disposal of
contaminated debris, and process changes,
including construction of a wastewater treatment
plant. In 1986 Koppers provided an alternate
water supply for domestic uses to affected
residents. In 1987 an explosion and fire occurred
at a PCP wood treatment process facility
prompting EPA to issue a removal order
requiring cleanup of fire debris, and removal and
stabilization of surface soil. This ROD addresses
the remaining contamination in onsite soil, and
ground water affected by site contamination. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the soil
and ground water are VOCs including toluene,
xylenes, and benzene; other organics including
PAHs, PCP, and dioxins/furans; and metals
including arsenic and chromium.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
a soil component and a ground water component.
The soil remedy includes four discrete soil
treatment areas: in-situ biodegradation of 110,000
cubic yards of PCP-contaminated soil; excavation
and soil washing of 200,000 cubic yards of soil
contaminated with wood treating wastes with
redisposal of treated soil onsite and treatment of
residual contamination in the washing fluid in an
onsite treatment facility; installation of a low
permeability cap over the wood treating process
area and downgradient extraction wells with
future treatment of 20,000 cubic yards of
contaminated soil beneath this area as soil
becomes accessible during equipment change or
ceasing of operations; and excavation and
chemical fixation of 4,000 cubic yards of soil
contaminated with metals, followed by onsite
disposal. The ground water remedy includes
pumping and treatment of approximately
22,000,000 cubic yards of ground water using
activated carbon, and reinjecting the treated waste
to the ground water; and formalizing the
provision for an existing alternate water supply
and extending, if needed, the water supply during
implementation of the remedy. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action is
$77,700,000, which includes an estimated present
worth O&M cost of $37,100,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The soil cleanup goals for the major contaminants
at the site are PCP 17 mg/kg, dioxin/furans 0.030
ug/kg, background for arsenic and chromium, and
cPAHs 0.19 mg/kg. Soil goals were set to meet
10"6 cancer-risk targets. Remedial objectives for
ground water are the more stringent of 10"*
cancer risks or State action levels. Specific goals
include PCP 2.2 ug/1, cPAHs 0.007 ug/1, dioxins
0.00000053 ug/1 or the lowest available detection
limit, and background levels for arsenic and
chromium.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not specified.
KEYWORDS: Alternate Water Supply; Arsenic;
Background Levels; Benzene; Biodegradation/Land
Application; Capping; Carbon Adsorption (GAC);
Carcinogenic Compounds; Chromium; Clean Air
Act; Dioxin; Direct Contact; Excavation;
Floodplain; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Leachability Tests; MCLs; Metals; O&M; Onsite
Containment; Onsite Discharge; Onsite Disposal;
Onsite Treatment; Organics; PAHs; Phenols;
Plume Management; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water
Act; Soil; Soil Washing/Flushing;
Solidification/Stabilization; State Permit; State
Standards/Regulations; Toluene; Treatability
Studies; Treatment Technology; VOCs; Water
Quality Criteria; Xylenes.
LJTCHFIELD AIRPORT AREA, AZ
Second Remedial Action - Final
September 26, 1989
The Litchfield Airport site, also known as the
Phoenix-Goodyear Airport Area site, covers
approximately 35 square miles and, except for the
airport, is almost entirely in the city of Goodyear.
The surrounding area is primarily agricultural,
however, residential development is anticipated in
the near future. A ground water divide running
under the area effectively divides the site into a
northern and southern area. Between 1981 and
1983, the State discovered that the ground water
was contaminated with solvents, metals, and
141
-------
VOCs. Sampling data identified contaminated
areas in the northern and southern portions of
the site due to onsite industrial activities and
waste handling by the former Goodyear
Aerospace Corporation (GAC), the former
Litchfield Park Naval Air Facility, and
UniDynamics, Phoenix, Inc. A 1987 ROD
addressed ground water in an area of the
southern portion of the site contaminated with
VOCs. This ROD addresses soil (vadose zone)
and ground water remediation for the remainder
of the site, with the exception of
chromium-contaminated soil in the sludge drying
beds at the former GAC facility. GAC owners
are currently performing an expedited response
action under an Administrative Order on Consent
for the chromium sludge beds. The primary
contaminants of concern affecting the soil and
ground water are VOCs including TCE, toluene,
and xylenes; and metals including arsenic,
chromium, and lead.
The selected remedial action for the northern
portion of the site includes treatment of soil
using soil vapor extraction (SVE) to remove 99%
of contaminants; and ground water pumping and
treatment using air stripping, liquid phase
granular activated carbon, and granular activated
carbon polishing on the air emissions, followed by
reinjection or discharge of treated ground water
to the municipal water system. Remedial
activities for the southern portion, of the site
include treatment of 284,100 square yards of
VOC-contaminated soil using SVE; and ground
water pumping and treatment using air stripping
and wellhead treatment, followed by discharge to
the municipal water system. The estimated
present worth cost for this remedial action ranges
between $30,227,000 and $31,693,000. O&M costs
will be determined during the remedial design.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
VOC- and metal-contaminated soil outside of the
sludge pits will be removed until remaining levels
will not cause or contribute to ground water
contamination in concentrations exceeding ground
water cleanup standards. Ground water cleanup
goals are based on SDWA MCLs, State action
levels (SALs) or CWA Ambient Water Quality
Cirteria (AWQC). Chemical-specific ground
water cleanup goals include toluene 340 ug/1
(SAL), TCE 5 ug/1 (MCL), xylenes 440 ug/1
(SAL), arsenic 50 ug/l (MCL), chromium 50 ug/1
(MCL), and lead 50 ug/1 (MCL).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Air Stripping; Arsenic; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Chromium; Clean Water Act; Direct Contact;
Ground Water; Ground Water Treatment; Lead;
MCLs; Metals; O&M; Offeite Discharge; Onsite
Treatment; Plume Management; Publicity Owned
Treatment Works (POTW); RCRA; Safe Drinking
Water Act; Soil; State Standards Regulations;
TCE; Toluene; Treatment Technology; Vacuum
Extraction; VOCs; Water Quality Criteria;
Xylenes.
NINETEENTH AVENUE LANDFILL, AZ
First Remedial Action - Final
September 29, 1989
The 213-acre Nineteenth Avenue Landfill is in an
industrial area of Maricopa County, Phoenix,
Arizona. The landfill is divided by the Salt River
channel into two sections or cells. A 200-acre
section, Cell A, lies north of the channel and a
13-acre section, Cell A-l, lies south of the
channel. State permitted landfill operations were
conducted from 1957 to 1979 during which time
approximately nine million cubic yards of
municipal refuse, solid and liquid industrial
wastes, and some medical wastes and materials
containing' low levels of radioactivity were
deposited in the landfill. Sampling of the
landfill contents has revealed no concentrated
sources of contamination, however, the State
ordered the landfill closed in 1979 due to the
periodic inundation of the landfill by flood waters
from the Salt River Channel. Subsequently, the
city covered the site with fill, stockpiled soil for
final capping, installed ground water monitoring
wells, built berms around the landfill, and
installed a methane gas collection system. This
remedial action is designed to mitigate threats
resulting from flooding of the landfill, which has
occurred intermittently since 1965. The primary
contaminants of concern in the soil/refuse include
VOCs such as toluene and xylenes. There is little
risk to public health from ground water pathways
142
-------
because ground water contaminants are of small
magnitude, and only limited migration has
occurred off the site.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
containing landfill wastes onsite by constructing
an impermeable cap and surface drainage
structures over the landfill, as well as soil-cement
levees along the river at the landfill boundary;
widening the river channel; collecting and flaring
landfill generated gases; institutional controls and
access restrictions; and air and ground water
monitoring. A contingency ground water
treatment plan will be implemented whenever
ground water standards are exceeded at the
landfill boundary. The estimated present worth
cost for this remedial action is $42,990,000, which
includes an annual O&M cost of $1,010,000 for
30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Not applicable to landfill wastes. Ground water
currently does not pose a risk to human health or
the environment. If monitoring detects
concentrations exceeding SDWA MCLs at the
property boundary a contingency plan will be
implemented.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls will be implemented but were not
specified.
KEYWORDS: Air; Air Monitoring; Capping;
Contingent Remedy; Ground Water; Ground
Water Monitoring; Institutional Controls; Levees;
MCLs; O&M; Onsite Containment; Safe Drinking
Water Act; Soil; State Standards/Regulations;
Surface Water Collection/Diversion.
PURITY OIL SALES, CA
First Remedial Action
September 26, 1989
The seven-acre Purity Oil Sales site is in Fresno
County, California, one-half mile south of the
Fresno city limits. The site is located in a
predominantly industrial area; however, there are
adjacent residential properties, including three
houses and a trailer park. The ground water
aquifer in the Fresno area has been designated as
a sole-source aquifer. The shallow aquifer
underlying the site is probably hydrogeologically
connected with deeper aquifer zones providing
the domestic water supply for Fresno and the
surrounding area. The Purity site operated as a
used oil recycling facility from 1934 to the early
1970s. In 1976 a fire destroyed the main
warehouse building. Equipment remaining, with
the exception of seven steel above-ground storage
tanks, was removed from the site, and the area
was partially regraded. One of the remaining
storage tanks is lined with asbestos. Waste pits
filled with soil, debris, and rubble cover most of
the site. The State conducted a remedial
investigation in 1982 during which time the EPA
Emergency Response Team removed 1,800 cubic
yards of hazardous oily and tarry materials from
the site. This first of two planned operable units
addresses the cleanup of the ground water and
the removal and offsite disposal of storage tanks
and tank contents. A future ROD will address
contaminated soil. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting ground water are VOCs
including benzene and TCE; and metals.
Contaminants of concern in the tank sludge are
VOCs including benzene, toluene and xylenes;
other organics including PCBs, PAHs, pesticides,
and phenols; and metals including lead.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
ground water pumping and onsite treatment with
greensand to remove metals and air stripping to
remove VOCs; disposal of treated ground water
by either reinfection into the aquifer, disposal in
a canal, or disposal in local infiltration basins;
provision of an alternate water supply to affected
private well owners; creation of a ground water
management zone to maintain ground water
levels; ground water monitoring; removal, onsite
solidification (if necessary), and offsite disposal of
22,500 gallons of contaminated sludge from the
seven onsite steel tanks; and cleaning,
dismantling, and offsite disposal of the tanks
including appropriate offsite disposal of the
asbestos walled tank. In addition, treatability
studies will be conducted on the site soil to
determine the effectiveness of several emerging
treatment technologies. The estimated present
worth cost for this remedial action is $11,660,000,
which includes a total cost of $500,000 for
removal of the steel tanks. A present worth
O&M cost of $6,960,000 is included in the total
present worth estimate.
143
-------
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Ground water treatment will meet Federal and
State SDWA MCLs and State Action Levels
(SALs). Chemical-specific cleanup goals for
ground water include benzene 1 ug/1 (SAL) and
TCE 5 ug/1 (MCL).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS; Institutional
methods to control well construction and
pumping will be implemented to maintain ground
water levels at the desired configuration.
KEYWORDS; Air Stripping; Alternate Water
Supply; Asbestos; Benzene; Carbon Adsorption
(GAC); Clean Air Act; Clean Water Act; Direct
Contact; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Institutional Controls; Lead; MCLs; Metals;
Organics; Offsite Discharge; Offsite Disposal;
Onsite Treatment; PAHs; PCBs; Pesticides;
Phenols; Plume Management; RCRA; Safe
Drinking Water Act; Sole-Source Aquifer;
Solidification/Stabilization; Sludge; State
Standards/Regulations; Toluene; TCE; Treatability
Studies; Treatment Technology; VOCs; Xylenes.
RAYTHEON, CA
First Remedial Action - Final
June 9, 1989
The Raytheon site is one of three Superfund sites
that are being remediated concurrently. The
other two are Fairchild Semiconductor (Mt. View)
and Intel (Mountain View Plant). The sites are
located in the Middlefield/Ellis/Whisman (MEW)
Study Area in Santa Clara County in the city of
Mountain View, California. Land use in the area
is primarily light industrial and commercial, with
some residential areas. There are no natural
surface drainage features within or surrounding
the site; most of the runoff is intercepted by a
storm drain system and discharged to an offsite
creek. Various industrial activties were conducted
in the vicinity of the site including semiconductor
manufacturing, metal finishing operations, parts
cleaning, aircraft maintenance, and other activities
requiring the use, storage, and handling of a
variety of chemicals, particularly solvents. Site
investigations at several of these facilities during
1981 and 1982 revealed significant contamination
by toxic chemicals, primarily VOCs, in soil and
ground water. The primary causes of the
contamination were leaking storage tanks and
lines, and poor management practices. Before
and during additional site investigations, which
were conducted under a 1985 Consent Order,
interim cleanup activities were conducted at the
site by Fairchild, Intel, and Raytheon. Cleanup
actions included tank removals, soil removal and
treatment, well sealing, construction of slurry
walls, and hydraulic control and treatment of local
ground water. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the site are VOCs including
PCE, TCE, TCA, toluene, and xylenes; and other
organics including phenols.
The selected remedy for this site includes in-situ
vapor extraction with treatment by vapor phase
GAC of contaminated soil found within the
Fairchild and Raytheon slurry walls. There may
be some limited soil excavation and treatment by
aeration for some areas outside of the slurry
walls, with onsite disposal of residues in the
excavated area; ground water pumping and
treatment using air stripping, and in some cases
liquid phase GAC, with emissions controls
consisting of GAC vapor phase carbon units,
followed by reuse of the ground water (reuse
options including reinfection are being developed)
and, if necessary, discharge to surface water;
sealing of any conduits or potential conduits to
protect the deep aquifer; and ground water
monitoring. The present worth cost for this
remedial action is $49,000,000 to $56,000,000,
which includes O&M costs.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The cleanup goals for soil are based on ensuring
the success of the ground water cleanup goal
(attaining MCLs) in the shallow aquifers.
Individual goals include TCE 1 mg/kg inside the
slurry walls and TCE 0.05 mg/kg outside the
slurry walls. Ground water cleanup goals for the
shallow aquifers, which are not currently used for
drinking water, are based on MCLs and a 10"4 to
10'5 excess cancer risk and include TCE 5 ug/1
(MCL). Goals for the deep aquifers, which are
used for drinking water, are based on a 10"*
cumulative cancer risk and include TCE 0.8 ug/1.
Attainment of these levels will also ensure
cleanup of other VOCs to at least their respective
MCLs.
144
-------
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Aeration; Air Monitoring; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Clean Water Act; Direct Contact; Drinking Water
Criteria; Excavation; Filling; Ground Water;
Ground Water Monitoring; Ground Water
Treatment; MCLs; O&M; Onsite Discharge;
Onsite Disposal; Onsite Treatment; Organics;
PCE; Phenols; Safe Drinking Water Act; Soil;
Solvents; State Standards/Regulations; TCE;
Toluene; Treatment Technology; VOCs;
Volatilization/Soil Aeration; Xylenes.
SACRAMENTO ARMY DEPOT, CA
First Remedial Action
September 29, 1989
The 485-acre Sacramento Army Depot (SAAD)
site, 7 miles southeast of downtown Sacramento,
California, is surrounded by land zoned as
commercial and light industrial property. SAAD
is an electronic maintenance and repair depot
consisting of storage, maintenance, and office
facilities. Present operations include shelter
repair, electro-optics equipment repair, metal
plating, and treatment of metal plating wastes.
From approximately 1947 to 1972 paint sludges,
oil, grease wood, trash, solvents and other
industrial wastes were burned and disposed of
onsite in burn pits. SAAD has since removed
most of the burned material from the burn pits.
The burn pits were subsequently covered with soil
and revegetated. Ground water samples, collected
by SAAD from 1981 to 1984, indicated that
several chemical compounds were present at levels
above drinking water standards in two areas. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
ground water are VOCs including TCE and PCE.
The selected remedial action for this interim
remedy includes ground water pumping and
treatment using ultraviolet light/chemical
oxidation followed by discharge to the regional
treatment plant and industrial reuse of the treated
ground water. The estimated capital cost for the
remedy is $1,764,000 with an estimated annual
O&M cost of $264,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The overall quality of the ground water will be
restored to meet current drinking water standards
for TCE 5 ug/1 (MCL) and PCE 4 ug/1 (State
action level).
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Carcinogenic Compounds; Direct
Contact; Ground Water; Ground Water
Treatment; Interim Remedy; MCLs; O&M;
Offeite Discharge; Onsite Treatment; PCE; Safe
Drinking Water Act; State Standards/ Regulations;
TCE; VOCs.
SAN FERNANDO VALLEY (AREA 1), CA
Second Remedial Action
June 30, 1989
The San Fernando Valley Basin (SFVB) Area 1
site is one of four Superfund sites (including
SFVB Areas 2, 3, and 4) being remediated as one
large site. The SFVB lies within the
approximately 328,500-acre Upper Los Angeles
River area. This remedial action is for the
Burbank Well Field operable unit of the SFVB
Area 1 site, located within the city of Burbank,
California, and addresses a portion of the overall
ground water problem in the SFVB Areas 1, 2, 3,
and 4 sites. The SFVB aquifers are an important
source of drinking water for approximately
600,000 residents in nearby cities and are also
used for commercial and industrial purposes.
Contaminated ground water is difficult to replace
in this area because water from the metropolitan
water district, an alternate source of drinking
water, may not always be available due to periodic
drought conditions and State and Federal water
rights issues. Contaminated ground water in the
SFVB wells was first discovered in 1980. Results
of a ground water monitoring program conducted
from 1981 through 1987 revealed approximately
50 percent of the water supply wells in the
eastern portion of the SFVB were contaminated
with TCE and PCE at concentrations exceeding
State and Federal drinking water standards. All
of Burbank's production wells have been shut
down due to this VOC contamination. In 1987
the primary contaminant TCE was found in
concentrations exceeding State Action Levels
(SALs) in 48 percent of the SFVB's 120
production wells, and PCE levels exceeded SALs
in 18 percent of the SFVB wells. In 1987 EPA
selected a remedy to address another operable
145
-------
unit in Area 1, specifically the threat of
contaminated public water supply wells located in
the city of North Hollywood. The selected
remedy for the North Hollywood operable unit
included the construction of an extraction and
aeration facility to pump and treat contaminated
ground water in the North Hollywood area. The
facility has been operational since March 1989.
The remedy selected for the Burbank operable
unit will control the migration of contaminated
ground water in the SFVB where additional
downgradient public water supply wells are
threatened by contamination and will aid in
aquifer restoration in the immediate Burbank
area. The primary contaminants of concern
affecting the ground water are VOCs including
TCE and PCE.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
pumping and treatment of ground water
contaminated with TCE exceeding 100 ug/1 or
PCE exceeding 5 ug/1 using air or stream
stripping, with vapor phase GAC adsorption units
if air stripping is used, and discharge to the
municipal water supply distribution system; and
ground water monitoring. The estimated present
worth cost for this remedial action is $69,000,000,
which includes an estimated present worth O&M
of 543,900,000 (for a 20-year period).
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The ground water will be treated to attain MCLs
including TCE 5.0 ug/1, and State Action Levels
(SALs) including PCE 4.0 ug/1 for treatment plant
effluent concentrations.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS; Air, Air Stripping; Carbon
Adsorption (GAC); Carcinogenic Compounds;
Direct Contact; Drinking Water Contaminants;
Ground Water; Ground Water Monitoring;
Ground Water Treatment; MCLs; O&M; Onsite
Discharge; Onsite Treatment; PCE; Plume
Management; Public Exposure; RCRA; Safe
Drinking Water Act; State Standards/ Regulations;
TCE; Treatment Technology; VOCs.
SOUTH BAY ASBESTOS AREA, CA
Second Remedial Action - Final
September 29, 1989
The South Bay Asbestos Area site is at the
northern end of the Santa Clara Valley and at
the southern end of the San Francisco Bay, in
San Jose, California. The 550-acre site includes
the community of Alviso in the city of San Jose
and neighbors a national wildlife refuge,
marshland, and wetlands which support several
endangered and threatened species. The land
surrounding Alviso has been artificially raised
with soil and debris fill, some containing asbestos
to offset the effects of subsidence. From 1953 to
1982 the site operated as an asbestos-cement pipe
manufacturing plant with asbestos-contaminated
waste being disposed of onsite in three landfills.
In 1983 the State collected soil samples which
revealed that asbestos was randomly distributed
throughout Alviso, including the Alviso Rim
levee. The State also determined that the
Guadulupe River levee contained
asbestos-contaminated waste debris and soil.
Contaminated soil from the levee was removed
and several emergency removal actions followed
to reduce exposure to asbestos. To address the
asbestos contamination at the site, EPA divided
remedial activities into two RODs. The first
ROD addressed contamination at the rim levee.
This second and final ROD addresses the asbestos
contamination found at the remainder of the site.
The primary contaminant of concern affecting the
soil, debris, and air is asbestos.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
paving approximately 128,500 square yards of an
asbestos-contaminated truck yard and industrial
yard; controlling dust emissions through monthly
wet sweeping of streets; offsite disposal of
asbestos-contaminated debris; air monitoring; and
implementation of deed restrictions and other
institutional controls. The estimated present
worth cost for this remedial action is $7,561,000
which includes annual O&M costs of $134,900 for
30 years.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Paving will be required for target areas with high
potential for soil disturbance and for areas which
are found to contain greater than one area
percent asbestos by polarized light microscopy.
146
-------
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Deed
restrictions and other institutional controls will
be implemented.
KEYWORDS: Air; Air Monitoring; Asbestos;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Air Act; Oean
Water Act; Debris; Direct Contact; Floodplain;
Institutional Controls; O&M; Offsite Disposal;
Soil; State Standards/Regulations; Toxic
Substances Control Act; Wetlands.
147
-------
RECORDS OF DECISION ABSTRACTS
REGION X
(Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington)
COMMENCEMENT BAY
NEAR SHORE/TIDE FLATS, WA
Second Remedial Action
September 30, 1989
The Commencement Bay Near Shore/Tide Flats
site is in Tacoma, Pierce County, Washington at
the southern end of the main basin of Puget
Sound. The site encompasses an active
commercial seaport and includes 10 to 12 square
miles of shallow water, shoreline, waterways and
adjacent land. Site contamination is the result of
a long history of industrial activity in the area.
More than 281 active industrial facilities are in
the area and approximately 34 of those are
NPDES permitted dischargers. Releases of
hazardous substances to the marine environment
have resulted in contamination of bottom
sediment in the waterways of the Tideflats
Industrial Area, and along the shoreline in the
Nearshore Area. This ROD represents two of six
operable units for the site and will address source
control and marine sediment contamination in the
Nearshore/Tideflats environment. Eight problem
areas are being addressed independently by this
remedy. The remaining operable units will
address remedial responses to releases of
hazardous substances associated with the Tacoma
tar pits and the ASARCO Tacoma smelter. The
primary contaminants of concern affecting the
sediment are organics including PCBs and PAHs;
and metals including arsenic, mercury, lead, and
zinc.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
an 8-year active cleanup phase for source control
and sediment remediation, and a 10-year natural
recovery phase. Source control remediation
includes the identification and control of sources
of contamination into the marine environment at
the site. Sediment remediation includes a
combination of natural recovery for areas
expected to recover naturally within a 10-year
period after source control measures are
implemented, and the utilization, as appropriate,
of four active sediment control alternatives to
remediate approximately 1,181,000 cubic yards of
contaminated sediment. The four sediment
confinement options include in-situ capping,
(placement of clean material on top of existing
substrate), confined aquatic disposal (removal of
contaminated sediments with confined disposal in
shallow or open-water aquatic environments using
capping with clean dredged material), confined
nearshore disposal (removal and confined disposal
in the nearshore environment with capping and
diking), and removal and upland disposal
(transferring dredged material to a land-based
confinement facility). In addition, the remedy will
implement site use restrictions, and source and
sediment monitoring. The estimated total cost
for sediment remediation at the site is
$32,300,000, which includes O&M costs for 10
years. Costs associated with source control
activities are not included in this ROD because of
the difficulty in determining what proportion of
total source-related cost can be attributed directly
to achieving remedial objectives.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
Sediment quality objectives will be achieved
within 10 years following source control in each
problem area. Sediment cleanup levels were
developed for each of the confinement
technologies using the apparent effects threshold
(AET) approach. An AET is the sediment
concentration of a chemical above which
statistically significant biological effects are always
observed. A sediment cleanup level of 150 ug/kg
was derived for PCBs to attain a fish tissue
concentration objective of 36 ug/kg which
translates to a 10"5 individual lifetime risk factor
for fish consumption. Other specific sediment
quality objectives include arsenic 57 mg/kg, lead
450 mg/kg, and PAHs 17,000 ug/kg.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Site use
restrictions will consist mainly of public warnings
and educational programs intended to reduce
potential exposure to site contamination,
particularly ingestion of contaminated seafood.
KEYWORDS: Arsenic; Capping; Carcinogenic
Compounds; Clean Water Act; Direct Contact;
148
-------
Dredging; Excavation; Floodplain; Institutional
Controls; Lead; Metals; Offeite Disposal; Onsite
Containment; Onsite Disposal; O&M; PAHs;
PCBs; RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act;
Sediment; State Permit; State Standards/
Regulations; Water Quality Criteria; Wetlands.
NORTHSIDE LANDFILL, WA
First Remedial Action - Final
September 30, 1989
The 345-acre Northside Landfill is in a mixed
residential and agricultural area, in the northwest
corner of the city of Spokane, Spokane County,
Washington. The landfill has been used since the
1930s by the city of Spokane and a variety of
private and public haulers for disposal of
residential and light commercial refuse. The
landfill is divided into four disposal units; refuse
unit, a grease skimmings unit, an old open burn
unit and a sewage sludge unit. Only the refuse
unit is active. However, this unit is scheduled to
close by 1992. The western one third of the
landfill lies over the large Spokane
Valley-Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer (SVRPA). The
SVRPA was designated as a sole source of water
supply for the Spokane-Coeur d'Alene area by
EPA in 1978. Investigations conducted in 1981
and 1983 indicated the presence of VOCs beneath
the site and in offsite residential wells located
northwest of the landfill. The city immediately
supplied the 19 affected residences with bottled
water and has since extended municipal water
lines to the area. The primary contaminants of
concern affecting the ground water are VOCs
including PCE, TCA, and TCE. In addition, iron
and lead exceed the secondary drinking water
standards offeite.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
immediate closure of the inactive units of the
landfill with final closure of the active portion by
1992; capping all disposal units; constructing an
interim pumping and treatment facility for ground
water remediation until landfill closure effectively
reduces contaminants to below the MCLs,
followed by offeite discharge of treated water into
the Spokane River; ground water monitoring;
providing an alternate supply of drinking water to
residences affected by the contaminated ground
water; implementing institutional controls to
restrict site access, protect the landfill cap, and
prevent construction of domestic wells in the
contaminated plume; and controlling landfill gas
emissions. The estimated present worth cost of
this remedy is $30,000,000.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The selected remedy is expected to control the
migration of ground water contaminants offeite
and meet MCLs or AWQC, whichever is
applicable. Chemical-specific ARARs for ground
water include TCA 200 ug/1 (MCL) and TCE 5
ug/1 (MCL). The performance criteria for PCE is
stated as 5 ug/1.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Institutional
controls will address the installation of new wells
within the contaminated plume and restrict site
access.
KEYWORDS: Alternate Water Supply; Capping;
Carcinogenic Compounds; Clean Air Act; Clean
Water Act; Direct Contact; Drinking Water
Contaminants; Ground Water; Ground Water
Monitoring; Ground Water Treatment;
Institutional Controls; Landfill Closure; MCLs;
Metals; Offeite Discharge; O&M; Onsite
Containment; Onsite Treatment; Organics; PCE;
RCRA; Safe Drinking Water Act; Sole-Source
Aquifer; Solvents; State Standards/Regulations;
TCE; VOCs; Water Quality Criteria.
NORTHWEST TRANSFORMER, WA
First Remedial Action - Final
September 15, 1989
The Northwest Transformer site (NWT), a
1.6-acre former salvage yard, is approximately 2
miles south of Everson in Whatcom County,
Washington. The site is in a rural area and is
bordered by low-density residential areas to the
north and east, and farmland to the south. The
NWT site was used for transformer storage and
salvage. Storage and salvage operations were
conducted in an onsite barn where PCB-
contaminated dielectric fluid was drained from
the transformers before dismantling. Transformer
casings and associated parts were incinerated
onsite, and some of the recovered oil was burned
to heat the barn. Spillage and leakage of
PCB-laden oil on the ground appeared to have
149
-------
occurred frequently, and some oil apparently was
dumped directly into a seepage pit onsite,
contaminating soil and possibly ground water.
EPA performed several soil and ground water
sampling studies between 1977 and 1985 and
identified PCS concentrations as high as 38,000
mg/kg. In 1985 EPA performed an Immediate
Removal Action to address the danger posed by
PCB contamination, including removing 1,400
cubic yards of PCB-contaminated soil and debris,
6,660 gallons of PCB-contaminated liquids, several
contaminated transformer casings, monitoring
ground water, and imposing site access
restrictions. In 1987 sampling during an RI/FS
identified sufficient PCB contamination in the soil
to warrant further site remediation. This
operable unit includes investigations of ground
water and the onsite barn to determine whether
either is sufficiently contaminated to merit a
subsequent operable unit. The primary
contaminant of concern affecting the soil is PCB.
The selected remedial action for this site includes
excavation, consolidation, and treatment of
approximately 1,200 cubic yards of soil with a
PCB concentration greater than 10 mg/kg using
in-situ vitrification; placement of two feet of clean
fill over the entire site; abandonment of an onsite
well; and ground water monitoring and sampling
of the wood in the onsite barn to determine if a
second operable is necessary to address
PCB-contamination in these media. The
estimated present worth cost for this remedial
action is $771,000 for soil treatment only with no
O&M required.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:
The contaminated soil will be treated until the
concentration of PCBs in the remaining residue
is less than 1 mg/kg. This concentration is below
the TSCA-required treatment concentration of 2
mg/kg PCBs in contaminated materials.
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS: Not applicable.
KEYWORDS: Direct Contact; Excavation;
Filling; Ground Water Monitoring; Onsite
Disposal; Onsite Treatment; PCBs; Soil; State
Standards/Regulations; Toxic Substances Control
Act; Treatment Technology; Treatability Studies;
Vitrification.
150
-------
SECTION m
RECORDS OF DECISION SUMMARY TABLE
FY 1989
The FY 1989 Record of Decision (ROD) Summary Table provides an
overview of site problems, selected remedies, cleanup criteria and estimated
costs provided in the RODs signed during FY 1989. The table is presented
by Region, in alphabetical order according to the site name.
151
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
I Auburn Road
Landfill, NH
14-Acre Landfill
Area
09/29/89
2nd - Final
I Baird & McGuire,
MA
Former Chemical
Manufacturing
Faci 1 i ty
09/14/89
3rd
I Kell ogg-Deeri ng
Well Field, CT
10-Acre
Municipal Well
Field
AQ/OQ/QQ
uy/ty/oy
9nrl
£nu
Threat/Problem
Soil and GW contami-
nated with VOCs
including benzene,
toluene, TCE, and
PCE; and metals
including arsenic and
lead
Sediment contami-
nated with organics
including PAHs and
pesticides; and
metals including
arsenic
Soil and GW contami-
nated with VOCs
including benzene,
toluene, PCE, TCE,
and xylenes
Components of
Waste Volume Selected Remedy
Not specified Downgradient GW puaping and treatment using
chemical coagulation and precipitation to
remove metal contaminants and air stripping
to remove VOCs, which will be collected in a
vapor phase carbon adsorption system,
followed by onsite discharge to recharge
trenches; GW monitoring; and capping
1,500 yd3 Sediment excavation and onsite incineration;
(sediment) backfilling excavated areas with clean fill
and onsite placement of treated sediment;
long-term SW and sediment monitoring;
wetland restoration; and placement of silt
cur-tains downstream of site
44,000 yd3 Onsite in-situ vacuum extraction of soil
(soil) followed by carbon adsorption; GW pumping
and treatment using air stripping followed
by offsite discharge; periodic GW, soil
vapor, and indoor air sampling; and
implementation of soil excavation and well
installation restrictions
Cleanuo Goals
Target GW cleanup goals are
based on SDWA MCLs or PMCLs
and include benzene 5 ug/1
(MCL), toluene 2,000 ug/1
(PMCL), PCE 5 ug/1 (PMCL),
TCE 5 ug/1 (MCL), arsenic
50 ug/1 (MCL), and lead
50 ug/1 (MCL)
Cleanup goals for sediment
areJjased on a 10~b to
10~° excess cancer risk.
Chemical -specific goals
include DDT 19 mg/kg,
arsenic 250 mg/kg,
chlorodane 5 mg/kg, and PAHs
22 mg/kg
Chemical-specific cleanup
goals for GW are based on
SDWA MCLs or PMCLs and
include benzene 0.005 mg/1 ,
toluene 2 mg/1, TCE 0.005
mg/1, and PCE 0.005 mg/1.
Chemical-specific cleanup
goals for soil are based on
a soil Teachability model,
vary depending on soil type,
and include benzene 0.0012-
.0367 mg/kg, toluene
5.5-169 mg/kg, TCE
0.012-0.358 mg/kg, and
PCE 0.033-1.036 mg/kg.
Present
Worth/
Capital and
ORM Costs
$24,100,000
(present
worth)
$1,460,000
(annual
present
worth O&M)
$1,656,000
(present
worth)
$22,000
(annual O&M)
$9,100,000
(present
worth)
$3,034,000
(present
worth O&M
years 1-30)
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Sunmary Table
Reaion
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Threat/Problem Waste Volume
Components of
Selected Remedy
Present
Worth/
Capital and
Cleanup Goals O&M Costs
Ul
w
Norwood PCBs, MA
Former Electrical
Equipment
Disposal Area
09/29/89
1st - Final
Soil, sediment,
debris, and GW
contaminated with
VOCs including PCE
and TCE; other
organics including
PAHs, PCBs and
phenols; and metals
31,000 yd3
(soil)
3,000 yd3
(sediment)
O'Connor, ME
9-Acre Trans-
former Recycling
Faci 1 i ty
09/27/89
1st - Final
Soil, sediment, GW
and SW contaminated
with VOCs including
benzene; other
organics including
PCBs and PAHs; and
metals including
lead
23,500 yd3
(soil and
sediment)
Excavation, solvent extraction and onsite
disposal of soil and sediment followed by
installation of soil cover over treated
soil; offsite incineration and disposal of
extracted PCB-contaminated oils; flushing
and cleansing portions of drainage system;
cleaning and sealing roof surfaces, and
decontaminating debris which exceed TSCA
cleanup levels; GW collection in a barrier
drain trench with onsite treatment by carbon
adsorption, air stripping and
preci pi tati on/f i1trati on; wetlands
restoration; GW, soil, sediment and debris
monitoring; and implementation of
institutional controls to restrict GW use
and to prevent soil and sediment disturbance
Pumping and offsite treatment of lagoon and
upland marsh SW; excavation and onsite
solvent extraction of soil and sediment,
followed by onsite disposal of residuals;
onsite treatment of gases from solvent
extraction process; extraction and offsite
incineration of solvent residues; onsite
solidification of soil and sediment that do
not achieve target cleanup levels, followed
by offsite disposal; backfilling and
upgrading excavated areas; GW pumping and
treatment using activated carbon adsorption
followed by onsite reinjection; sediment and
GW monitoring; and implementation of deed
and land use restriction to prohibit GW use
EPA divided the site into 3
sections and established
cleanup levels for each
section. Chemical-specific
soil target cleanup levels
range depending on location
of soil, and include PCBs
1-10 mg/kg (based on a
cancer-risk level no greater
than 7 x 10~°), PAHs
2-6 mg/kg (based on a
cancer-risk level no greater
than 7 x 10~°). TCE
24 ug/kg and PCE 60 ug/kg
(both based on preventing
contamination to GW above
MCLs). Sediment cleanup
levels include PCBs 1 mg/kg
(based on 1.5 x 10~7
excess cancer-risk level)
and PCBs 0.5 ug/kg for
discharge to SW. GW cleanup
goals are based on Federal
and State MCLs and include
TCE 5 ug/1 and PCE 5 ug/1
Target cleanup goals are
based on a 10~5 excess
cancer risk. Individual
goals for soil and sediment
include PCBs 1 mg/kg, PAHs
1 mg/kg, and lead 248 mg/kg;
for GW: PCBs 0.5 ug/1 and
benzene 5 ug/1; for SW:
PCBs 0.065 ug/1 and lead
1.94 ug/1
$16,100,000
(present
worth;
includes O&M
years 1-10)
$14,221,000
(total cost)
$56,000
(O&M year 1)
$54,000
(O&M years
2-4)
$92,000
(O&M year 5)
$65,000
(O&M years
6-30)
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Reai on Radial Action IhrejL
Components of
:/Prob1em Waste Volume Selected Remedy
Present
Worth/
Capital and
Cleanup Goals OSM Costs
01
Pinette's
Salvage Yard, ME
PCB Spill Area
05/30/89
1st - Final
Soil and GW
contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene; other
organics including
PCBs; and metals
including lead
Saco Tannery
Waste Pits, ME
Process Waste
Disposal Area
09/27/89
1st - Final
Sediment, sludge, GW,
and SW contaminated
with metals including
arsenic, chromium,
and lead
2,200 yd3 Excavation and offsite incineration of soil
(soil) with PCB concentrations >50 mg/kg;
excavation and onsite solvent extraction of
soil with PCB concentrations between
5-50 mg/kg with offsite incineration of
treatment process effluent and onsite
treatment of air emissions; excavation and
onsite disposal of surface soil with PCB
concentrations between 1-5 mg/kg, followed
by additional soil covering and
revegetation; GW pumping and treatment using
filtration and carbon adsorption, followed
by discharge into aquifer; sediment, GW, and
SW monitoring; and implementation of access
restrictions and institutional controls
Not specified The selected remedial action is contingent
upon the State designating the site a
permanent conservation area and includes
pumping, offsite treatment and discharge of
water from waste pits and lagoons followed
by covering and revegetating waste pits,
lagoons, and wet areas; compensating for
lost wetlands; GW and SW monitoring;
implementating institutional controls; and
implementing a contingency plan, if
legislation is not passed which includes
excavating and solidifying soil and sludge
with onsite disposal in a RCRA-pennitted
landfill; and GW and SW monitoring
Target soil cleanup goals
include PCBs 5 mg/kg (State)
and benzene 260 ug/kg.
Target GW cleanup goals
include PCBs 0.5 ug/1
(State), benzene 5 ug/1
(MCL), and lead 5 ug/1
(MCL). EPA is in- voking a
waiver from the PCB target
cleanup goal due to
technical impracticability
Target cleanup goals were
developed for sediment and
sludge contaminants which
exceed a carcinogenic risk
of 10 or a noncarcino-
genic risk greater than an
HI of 1.0. Specific goals
include total chromium 2,000
mg/kg (based on ecological
risk assessment), lead 125
mg/kg (State), and arsenic
60 mg/kg. If GW contami-
nants exceed ACLs, further
site evaluation will be
necessary
$4,367,000
(present
worth)
$135,000
(annual O&M
years 1-2)
$42,000
(annual O&M
years 3-5)
$20,000
(annual O&M
years 6-30)
$9,211,600 -
$10,551,400
(present
worth)
$2,500,000 -
$3,800,000
(O&M)
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Region Remedial Action
Threat/Problem
Waste Volume
Components of
Selected Remedy
Clf
Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
en
ui
South Municipal
Water Supply
Well, NH
Manufacturing
Facility
09/Z7/89
1st - Final
Soil, sediment, and
GW contaminated with
VOCs including PCE,
TCE and toluene;
other organics
including PCBs and
PAHs; and metals
7,500 yd3
(soil)
1,170 yd3
(sediment)
GW pumping and treatment using a phase
separation settlement tank/pretreatment
system, air stripping, carbon columns for
air emission control, and onsite discharge;
GW pumping from dilute plume and treatment
using air stripping and carbon columns and
onsite discharge; in-situ vacuum extraction
of soil; excavation and/or dredging with
dewatering of wetlands sediment and offsite
disposal; wetlands restoration; surface
contouring and revegetation; long-term GW
monitoring; and implementation of
institutional controls including GW use and
well installation restrictions
Target cleanup levels for GW
are based on SWDA MCLs or
PMCLs and include PCE 5
ug/1, TCE 5 ug/1, and
toluene 2,000 ug/1. Target
cleanup levels for soil were
established to reduce
contaminant migration to GW
and include PCE 4.5 ug/kg,
TCE 1.5 ug/kg, and toluene
1,500 ug/kg. Soil target
levels will attain 3 x
10~lu excess cancer-risk
level. Target cleanup
levels for sediment include
PAHs 1.1 ug/kg and PCBs
1 ug/kg, which will attain
an excess cancer risk of
2.9 x 10"' for PCBs and
1.3 x 10-° for PAHs for.a
total risk of 1.3 x 10~6
$7,387,769
(present
worth)
$3,992,105
(O&M)
-------
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Th;
at/Problt
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
Components of
ste Volume Selected Remedy
Cleanup Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
Pan Costs
01
o>
Sullivan's
Ledge, MA
12-Acre Waste
Disposal Area
06/29/89
1st
Soil, sediment, GW,
and SW contaminated
with VOCs, including
benzene and TCE;
other organics in-
cluding PCBs and
PAHs; and metals
including lead
24,200 yd3 Excavation/dredging of soil/sediment with
(soil) onsite solidification, followed by onsite
disposal and capping; air monitoring;
1,900 yd3 diversion and lining of the stream adjacent
(sediment) to site; GW pumping and passive underdrain
collection and treatment using
oxidation/filtration and UV/ozonation with
offsite disposal of contaminated residues;
wetlands restoration/enhancement;sediment,
GW, and SW monitoring; and implementation
of GW use and land access restrictions
Onsite soil cleanup stan-
dards for PCBs and PAHs are
health based using a 10~b
cancer-risk level and in-
clude remediation of soil
contaminated with total PCBs
>50 mg/kg and/or total cPAHs
>30 mg/kg. Offsite soil
with PCBs >10 mg/kg (based
on a 10~b cancer-risk
level) will be excavated and
disposed of onsite, and soil
with PCBs >50 mg/kg will be
solidified onsite. Sediment
cleanup standard for PCBs is
the interim sediment quality
criteria value of PCBs
20 ug/gC. Where TOC
<10 gC/kg, target treatment
for sediment will be PCB
0.2 mg/kg. GW standards
include VOCs 1-10 mg/1
and/or until there is no
significant contaminant
reduction
$10,100,000
(present
worth)
W.R. Grace, MA
(Acton Plant)
200-Acre Waste
Disposal Area
09/29/89
1st
Sediment, soil, and
sludge contaminated
with VOCs including
benzene and toluene;
other organics; and
metals including
arsenic
Not specified Excavating and incinerating offsite highly
contaminated soil and sludge; solidifying
onsite less contaminated soil, sludge, and
sediment, followed by onsite disposal in the
landfill and capping the landfill; covering
and monitoring other waste areas; modifying
the aquifer restoration system; and
envi ronmental moni tori ng
Soil cleanup goals will
ensure that any further
contaminant migration to GW
will not result in GW levels
exceeding drinking water
standards. Chemical-
specific goals were provided
but specific goals for each
contaminant varied depending
on the location of the waste
area onsite. The overall
cumulative risk associated
with the soil cleanup level
is 8.34 x 10~7
$7,058,000
(total cost)
$2,468,000
(O&M)
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
SI
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Real on Remedial Action
I Wells G&H, MA
Municipal Well
Field
09/14/89
1st
II BEC Trucking, NY
Former Truck
Maintenance
Faci 1 i ty
09/28/89
1st - Final
II Bog Creek Farm,
NO
Waste Disposal
Site
06/28/89
2nd - Final
Threat/Problem
Soil, sludge, debris,
and GW contaminated
with VOCs including
TCE and PCE; other
organics including
cPAHs, PCBs, and
pesticides; and
metals including
lead
None
Sediment and GW
contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene, toluene, and
xylenes; other
organics including
phenols; and metals
including lead
Waste Volume
10,500 yd3
(soil)
410 yd3
(sludge and
debris)
Not
appl i cabl e
90 yd3
(sediment)
Components of
Selected Remedy
In-situ volatilization using carbon
adsorption for treatment of the extracted
vapor of VOC-contami nated soil; excavation
and onsite incineration of the remaining
contaminated soil and backfilling of the
excavated areas; GW pumping and treatment
using pretreatment for metals, followed by
air stripping and vapor phase carbon
filtering with either onsite discharge or
reinjection, or both; removing and disposing
sludge and debris; GW monitoring; and
implementation of deed and land use
restrictions
No further action with GW and SW monitoring
GW pumping and treatment using air
stripping, Ho02-UV photolysis oxidation,
and carbon adsorption and reinjection; brook
sediment excavation followed by onsite
incineration and onsite disposal; and
streambed restoration
Cleanup Goals
GW cleanup goals include
TCE 5.0 ug/1 (MCL) and
PCE 5.0 ug/1 (PMCL). Soil
cleanup goals and include
PCE 36.7 ug/kg and TCE
12.7 ug/kg (based on
protecting GW from VOC
contamination from the
soil); cPAHs 0.694 mg/kg,
PCB 1 .04 mg/kg, and 4-4'
DDT 23.5 mg/kg (based on a
10~b cancer-risk level);
and lead 640 mg/kg (based on
target blood level of
10 ug/dl)
Not applicable
GW cleanup goals are
derived from discharge
limits allowed under a State
permit. Specific goals
include benzene, 5 ug/1;
toluene 74 ug/1; phenols
47 ug/1 ; and 1 ead 56 ug/1
Present
Worth/
Capi tal and
O&M Costs
$68,400,000
(present
worth)
$0
(OSM)
$0
(capital)
OSM to be
determined
$6,927,000
(present
worth)
$663,000
(annual O&M
years 1-10)
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
01
o»
Region
II
II
II
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Byron Barrel &
Drum, NY
Former Salvage
Yard
09/29/89
1st - Final
Cal dwell
Trucking, NJ
Former Septic
Waste Disposal
Area
09/28/89
2nd
Chemi cal
Insecticide, NJ
Pesticide
Production
Facility
09/29/89
1st
Threat/Problem Waste Volume
Soil and GW con- 4,100 yd3
taminated with VOCs (soil)
including benzene,
PCE, TCE, toluene,
and xylenes; other
organics including
PAHs and phenols; and
metals including
chromium and lead
GW contaminated with Not specified
VOCs including TCE
Soil and SW Not specified
contaminated with
organics including
pesticides and metals
including arsenic
Components of
Selected Remedv
GW pumping and treatment using
precipitation, sedimentation, and filtration
to remove inorganics and air stripping and
carbon adsorption to remove organics,
followed by reinjection into aquifer and, if
necessary, off site discharge of excess
treated water; off site disposal of GW
residues; in-situ soil flushing; dismantling
and decontaminating debris, followed by
offsite disposal; and air and GW monitoring
GW pumping and treatment using airstripping
with offsite discharge to SW; installation
of a drainage system; sealing GW wells; and
GW monitoring
Clearing, grading and capping site;
constructing a SW run-off diversion system;
controlling the release of uncontami nated SW
run-off; and SW monitoring
Cleanup Goals
GW will meet State and
Federal ARARs. Specific GW
cleanup levels include
benzene 5 ug/1 (MCL),
toluene 2,000 ug/1 (PMCL),
xylenes 440 ug/1 (MCL), PCE
5 ug/1 (based on TCE MCL),
and TCE 5 ug/1 (MCL). Soil
will meet site-specific
action levels including
toluene 45,000 ug/kg,
xylenes 8,200 ug/kg, PCE
140 ug/kg, and TCE 47 ug/kg
ARAR waiver invoked based on
technical impracticability.
Remedy will achieve interim
cleanup levels which will
allow for potable use of GW
SW discharge standards
provided for arsenic 50 ug/1
and for five pesticides
based on State standards
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$5,572,000
(present
worth)
$259,700
(annual O&M)
$11,540,000
(present
worth)
$315,000
(annual O&M
years 1-30)
$1,420,211
(present
worth)
$37,184
(annual OSM)
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Reaion Remedial Action
Threat/Problem Waste Volume
Components of
Selected Remedy
Cleanup Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
II
Ciba-Geigy, NJ GW contaminated with Not specified
Industrial
Faci1i ty
04/24/89
1st
VOCs including
benzene, PCE, TCE,
and toluene; and
metals including
arsenic and chromium
Sealing contaminated residential irrigation
wells; on- and offsite GW pumping with
onsite treatment using filtration, reverse
osmosis, and GAC followed by temporarily
retaining GW in monitoring basins and
subsequent discharge to SW; and imple-
mentation of a river and GW monitoring
program
Treated GW will meet the
proposed State Surface Water
Quality Standards including
benzene 1 ug/1, PCE
1 ug/1, TCE 1 ug/1, toluene
26 ug/1, total chromium
50 ug/1, and arsenic
50 ug/1. State MCLs will be
attained for the aquifer
including benzene 1 mg/1,
PCE 1 mg/1, TCE 8 mg/1,
aresenic 0.05 ug/1, and
chromium 0.05 mg/1. For
unregulated VOCs in the
aquifer, single contaminant
levels for carcinogens are
not to exceed 5 ug/1 and
50 ug/1 for possible
carcinogens or non-
carcinogens
$164,500,000
(present
worth)
$12,539,000
(annual O&M)
II
II
Claremont
Polychemical,
Industrial
Facility
09/22/89
2nd - Final
Clothier
Disposal, NY
6-Acre Non-
Permitted
Disposal Area
12/28/88
1st - Final
Sludge and debris
NY contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene, toluene,
TCE, and PCE; other
organics; and metals
including arsenic,
chromium, and lead
Soil contaminated
with VOCs including
toluene, xylenes, and
PCE; other organics
including PAHs, PCBs,
and phenols; and
metal s
100,000 Ibs
(solids)
25,000 Ibs
(sludge)
10,000 Ibs
(liquids)
Not specified
Compatibility testing and consolidation of
compatible wastes and pumping contents of
tanks, basins and sump into storage tanks;
analytical testing of samples to determine
appropriate treatment or disposal methods;
and transporting wastes for offsite
treatment or disposal, as appropriate
Placing a soil cover over the contaminated
areas, regrading, and revegetating site;
installing rip-rap, as needed; construction
and post-construction air monitoring; long-
term soil, sediment, GW, and SW monitoring;
and implementing land use and GW use
restrictions
RCRA wastes will be treated
to BOAT or treated to attain
specific treatment levels,
as appropriate, to comply
with RCRA LDRs. Chemical-
specific goals were not
specified
Because the remedy addresses
containment, chemical-
specific goals are not
appli cable
$1,339,000
(present
worth)
$0
(O&M)
$500,000
(present
worth)
$27,000
(annual O&M)
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Sunwary Table
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
ioion Remedial Action
Threat/Problem
Haste Volume
Components of
Selected Reeedv
Cleanup Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&H Costs
II
De Rewal
Chemi cal, NJ
Former Dumping
Area
09/29/89
1st
Soil and GW con-
taminated with VOCs
including PCE, TCE
and toluene; other
organics including
PAHs; and metals
including chromium
and lead
Ewan Property, NO Soil and GW con-
taminated with VOCs
including benzene,
TCE, PCE, toluene,
and xylenes; and
metals including
chromium and lead
II
j± 43-Acre
o Industrial Waste
Disposal Area
09/29/89
2nd - Final
II FAA Technical
Center, NO
Federal Facility
09/26/89
1st
Soil and GW con-
taminated with VOCs
including benzene,
toluene, and xylenes;
and other organics
including PAHs and
phenols
8,000 yd3
(soil)
22,000 yd3
(soil)
33,000 yd3
(soil)
360,000 gals
(free
product)
13,300,000
gals (GW)
Excavation and onsite thermal treatment of
organic-contaminated soil and solidification
of inorganic-contaminated soil and ash
residues followed by onsite disposal
monitoring and controlling air emissions
generated during thermal treatment; GW
pumping and offsite treatment at an
industrial wastewater treatment facility; GW
monitoring; provision of a treatment system
for onsite residential well; temporary
relocation of onsite residents; preparation
of cultural resources survey; and
implementation of land use restrictions
Excavating and treating soil using solvent
extraction and soil washing, followed by
redepositing treated soil onsite as clean
fill; treating and disposing of spent
solvent offsite; treating spent wash water
onsite using GW treatment system; regrading
and revegetating disposal areas; GW pumping
and treatment, followed by reinjection into
aquifer; and environmental monitoring
In-situ soil vacuum extraction (soil
venting) and off-gas treatement using either
incineration or activated carbon adsorption;
extraction of the free product floating on
the plume followed by offsite incineration;
GW extraction and addition of nutrients for
subsequent reinjection and in-situ
biodegradation of residual GW contamination;
and GW monitoring
Contaminated soil which $5,097,000
exceeds State action levels (present
will be excavated and worth)
treated to meet State action
levels which include VOCs $865,400
1 dig/kg, chromium 100 mg/kg, (O&M)
and lead 250 mg/kg. GW will
also be treated to meet
State SDWA MCLs which
include TCE 1 ug/1, PCE
1 ug/1, chromi urn 50 ug/1,
and lead 50 ug/1
Treated soil will meet State $35,152,447
Solid Waste Regulations. (present
Treated GW will meet State worth)
water quality criteria
(SWQC) and MCLs. Specific $1,903,980
GW treatment levels include (annual O&M)
benzene 1 ug/1 (SWQC), TCE
26 ug/1 (SWQC), toluene
2,000 ug/1 (PMCL), xylenes
44 ug/1 (SWQC), lead 50 ug/1
(MCL), and chromium 50 ug/1
(SWQC)
GW cleanup goals are based $583,000
on Federal and State MCLs (present
and include benzene 1 ug/1 worth)
(MCL), xylenes (total)
44 ug/1 (State MCL), toluene $200,000
2,000 ug/1 (Federal PMCL), (total
and phenols 300 ug/1 (State present
GWQS). Soil cleanup levels worth OSM)
are based on State Soil
cleanup action levels and
include 1 mg/kg for total
priority pollutant VOCs and
100 mg/kg for total
petroleum hydrocarbons
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Region Remedial Action
Threat/Problem
Waste Volume
Components of
Selected Remedy
Cleanup Goals
Present
Worth/
Capi tal and
O&M Costs
II Fulton
Terminals, NY
Hazardous Waste
Staging and
Storage Area
09/29/89
1st - Final
II Glen Ridge
Radium Site, NJ
Former Radium
Processing or
Utilization Area
06/30/89
1st
II Marathon
Battery, NY
Former Battery
Manufacturing
Faci1ity
09/29/89
3rd - Final
Soil and GW con-
taminated with VOCs
including benzene,
TCE and xylenes;
other organics
including PAHs; and
metals including
arsenic
4,000 ydd
(soil)
Soil and structures
contaminated with
radium '"
41,000 yd3
(soil)
Sediment contaminated
with metals including
cadmium and nickel
55,000 yd3
(sediment)
Excavation and low temperature thermal
treatment of soil followed by backfilling;
capping site with clean top soil; GW pumping
and treatment using air stripping and carbon
adsorption followed by reinjection or other
type of recharge into the aquifer; disposal
of soil and GW treatment residues waste at a
RCRA-approved facility; air and GW moni-
toring; and implementation of institutional
controls including GW use restrictions
Excavation and offsite disposal of soil and
debris; installation and maintenance of
indoor engineering controls; environmental
monitoring; and continuation of treatment
technology study
Dredging cadmium-contaminated sediment
followed by onsite chemical fixation and
off site disposal; sediment sampling with
dredging and onsite treatment; and sediment
monitoring
Soil treatment levels are $4,031,000
designed to prevent leaching (present
to GW that will result in worth)
levels above MCLs. Chemical -
specific soil goals include $732,000
TCE 2 mg/kg, benzene (annual O&M
1.4 mg/kg, and xylenes years 1-3)
8 mg/kg. GW cleanup goals
will meet the more stringent
of Federal or State drinking
water standards including
TCE 5 ug/1 (MCL) and arsenic
1,000 ug/1 (MCL)
Surface soil (top 6") will $53,000,000
be removed until concen- (present
tration is 5 pCi/g above worth)
background and subsurface
soil is 15 pCi/g above $0
background (OSM)
Acceptable sediment concen- $48,499,500
tration of cadmium is (present
220 mg/kg. Expectations are worth)
that by dredging the upper
layer of contaminated sedi- $21,303,330
ment, 95% of the cadmium (O&M year 1)
contamination will be
removed. Following remedia- $132,700
tion, cadmium concentrations (O&M years
are not expected to exceed 2-30)
10 mg/kg
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
o>
to
Region
II
II
II
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Montclair/
West Orange
Radium Site, NJ
Former Radium
Processing or
Utilization Area
06/30/89
1st
North Sea
Municipal
Landfill, NY
131-Acre
Municipal
Landfill
09/29/89
1st
Pepe Field, NO
Processing
Wastes Disposal
Area
09/29/89
1st - Final
Threat/Problem Waste Volume
Soil and structures 41,000 yd3
contaminated with (soil)
radium u*
Soil and sludge con- Not specified
taminated with VOCs;
other organics in-
cluding PAHs; metals
including arsenic and
lead; and other
inorganics
Soil found in land- Not specified
fill contaminated
with hydrogen sulfide
and methane gases
Components of
Selected Remedy
Excavation and off site disposal of soil and
debris; installation and maintenance of
indoor engineering controls; environmental
monitoring; and continuation of treatment
technology study
Capping landfill cell #1; implementing site
security and deed restrictions; sampling
sludge/soil in former sludge lagoons; and
long-term air, SW, and GW quality monitoring
Installing and maintaining landfill gas
collection and treatment system using of
carbon adsorption; disposing carbon offsite;
upgrading and maintaining existing leachate
collection and treatment system; GW
monitoring; and implementing deed
restrictions
Cleanup Goals
Surface soil (top 6") will
be removed until concen-
tration is 5 pCi/g above
background and subsurface
soil is 15 pCi/g above
background
Capping the landfill reduces
emissions of methane and
VOCs, and reduces
precipitation percolation
through the landfill and
thus migration of hazardous
substances into GW.
Individual contaminant goals
were not specified
GW and soil already meet
State drinking water
standards and State action
levels. Leachate quality
will -comply with State
requirements. Emissions
from gas treatment system
will comply with State air
pollution regulations.
Chemical -specific cleanup
goals were not specified
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$53,000,000
(present
worth)
$0
(O&M)
$7,700,000 -
$8,300,000
(present
worth)
$190,000 -
$200,000
(annual O&M)
$1,293,700
(present
worth)
$108,000
(O&M years
1-2)
$93,000
(O&M years
3-30)
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
Region
II
II
II
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Picatinny
Arsenal , NJ
Federal Facility
Weapons and
Munitions
Research and
Development
Installation
09/28/89
1st
Port Washington
Landfill, NY
53-Acre Inactive
Landfill
09/30/89
1st - Final
Preferred
Plating, NY
Plating Facility
09/22/89
1st
Threat/Problem
GW contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
and metals
Soil and GW con-
taminated with VOCs
including PCE, TCE,
and benzene; and
other organics in-
cluding methane gas
GW contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
and PCE; and metals
including chromium
and lead
Components of
Waste Volume Selected Remedy
Not specified GW pumping and treatment using pretreatment
for metals and solids removal and air
stripping for VOCs removal; discharge of
treated GW to SW; and air and effluent
monitoring
Not specified Capping landfill; rehabilitating existing
gas collection system and installing
additional vacuum extraction vents; GW
pumping and treatment using air stripping
followed by discharge to an aquifer recharge
basin; and environmental monitoring
Not specified GW pumping and treatment using precipi-
tation, carbon adsorption, and ion exchange
followed by GW reinjection, and off site
disposal of treatment residues
Cleanup Goals
ARARs for GW cleanup will
apply to final remedial
action, not to this interim
action
GW cleanup goals are based
on SDWA MCLs and State
standards for drinking
water. Chemical -specific
goals were not specified
GW cleanup goals are based
on SDWA MCLs and State water
quality regulations and will
be attained provided up-
gradient source areas are
removed
Present
Worth/
Capital and
08M Costs
$2,100,000
( capi tal )
$1,100,000
(annual O&M)
$42,580,000
(present
worth)
$16,247,000
(present
worth O&M
years 1-30)
$9,327,400
(present
worth)
$920,900
(annual O&M
years 1-12)
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Swnary Table
Recrion
II
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Rewd.ial Aptipn
SMS Instruments
(Deer Park), NY
Active
Industrial
Faci 1 i ty
09/29/89
1st
Threat/Problem
Soil and GW con-
taminated with VOCs
including PCE, TCE,
and xylenes; and
metals including
chromium and lead
Components of
Waste Volume Selected Remedy
1,250 yd3 In-situ steam stripping of soil, and GW
(soil) pumping and treatment using air stripping
followed by reinjection. A contingency plan
may be implemented if in-situ steam
stripping cannot be utilized effectively;
contingency plan includes off site
incineration of contaminated soil
Cleanup Goals
Treated GW will meet State
and Federal drinking water
standards prior to rein-
jection. Specific GW clean-
up goals include TCE 5 ug/1
(MCL), PCE 0.7 ug/1 (State),
xylenes 5 ug/1 (State),
chromium 50 ug/1 (MCL), and
lead 25 ug/1 (State). Soil
will be treated until all
contaminants of concern
attain a level less than
10 ug/kg
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$1,195,800
(present
worth)
$437,576
(annual
present
worth O&M)
2 ii
Vi neland
Chemi cal, NO
Disposal Area
09/28/89
1st
Soil, sediment, and
GW contaminated with
metals including
arsenic
126,000 yd3
(soil)
62,600 yd3
(sediment)
Site remediation has been divided into
4 OUs. OU 1 includes in-situ flushing of
soil with onsite treatment along with GW
from OU 2; decontaminating onsite storage
buildings; and closing two impondments after
offsite treatment and disposal of recovered
wastewater and sludge. OU 2 includes GW
pumping and onsite treatment followed either
by reinjection, offsite discharge to SW, or
reuse for soil flushing. OU 3 includes
excavating, dredging, and treating sediment
using water wash extraction followed by
onsite redeposition of treated sediment, and
implementing natural river flushing. OU 4
is an interim remedy for lake sediment and
includes dredging, excavating, and treating
sediment using water wash extraction
followed by redeposition and sediment and SW
monitoring; treating and disposing of sludge
residue offsite will follow all treatments
Soil, sediment, and GW clean-
up goals for arsenic are
based on 10~6 health-based
levels and MCLs. Specific
goals include 20 mg/kg (soil
and surface sediment),
120 mg/kg (submerged
sediment), and 50 ug/1 (GW)
$66,384,636
(present
worth)
$3,463,463
(short-term
source
control O&M)
$38,010
(long-term
source
control O&M)
$5,155,053
(GW O&M)
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
o>
01
Reaion
II
III
III
III
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Vine! and State
School, NJ
195-Acre
Residential
Treatment
Facility
09/30/89
1st - Final
Ambler Asbestos
Piles, PA
3.5-Acre
Asbestos Pile
09/29/89
2nd - Final
Bally Ground
Water
Contamination, PA
Municipal Well
Field
06/30/89
1st
Craig Farm Drum,
PA
Industrial
Landfill
09/29/89
1st - Final
Threat/Problem
None
Soil, sediment,
debris, and SW
contaminated with
asbestos
GW contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
Soil and GW con-
taminated with VOCs
including benzene;
other organics
including phenols;
metals including
chromium and lead;
and other inorganics
Components of
Waste Volume Selected Remedv
Not Investigation results indicated very low
applicable levels of contamination. Because risks fall
within the acceptable range, as determined
by the State and EPA, no further remedial
action is considered necessary
110,000 yd3 Regrading waste pile and placing a soil
(debris) cover over portions of the site; performing
a verification study to determine the source
of inorganics in SW; installing and
implementing erosion and sedimentation
controls; SW and air monitoring; and
implementing institutional controls
including land use restrictions
Not specified Abandoning appropriate wells; GW pumping and
treatment by air stripping with either vapor
phase carbon, regenerable vapor phase
carbon, or vapor phase catalytic oxidation,
followed by discharging treated water to an
adjacent stream or municipal potable water
system; GW and SW monitoring; and imple-
menting institutional controls restricting
GW use and the construction of new wells
32,000 yd3 Excavating soil with onsite treatment using
(soil) solidification; placing treated soil in
newly excavated and lined onsite landfill
followed by capping; collecting GW using a
seep interceptor with off site treatment;
performing GW verification study; and
providing deed notices to property owners
Cleanup Goals
Not applicable
Remedy addresses containment
of asbestos-contaminated
debris; therefore, no
cleanup level is provided
for the debris
GW will be treated to meet
MCLs or PMCLs when final
MCLs are unavailable.
Chemical -specific goals
include TCE 0.005 mg/1 (MCL)
Soil will be excavated until
organics are undetectable
« 50 mg/kg). GW
performance levels include
benzene 0.005 mg/1 (MCL),
phenols 3.5 mg/1 (AWQC),
chromium 0.05 mg/1 (MCL),
and lead 0.05 mg/1 (MCL)
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
Not specified
$753,000
(present
worth)
$21,700
(O&M years
1-5)
$10,200
(O&M years
6-30)
$2,950,000 -
$3,640,000
(present
worth)
$105,000 -
$189,000
(O&M)
$5,188,000
(present
worth)
$124,000
(annual O&M
years 1-30)
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Region Remedial Action
Threat/Problem
Waste Volume
Components of
Selected Remedy
Cleanup Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&H Costs
o>
O)
III Croydon TCE, PA
TCE Spill Site
12/28/88
1st
III CryoChem, PA
Fabri cati ng
Faci1i ty
09/29/89
1st
III Douglassville
Disposal, PA
50-Acre
Abandoned Waste
Oil Processing
Facility
06/30/89
2nd - Final
GW contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
and PCE
GW contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
and PCE
Not specified
Not
appl i cabl e
Soil, sediment, and
GW contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene, toluene, and
vinyl chloride; other
organics including
PAHs, PCBs, and
phenols; and metals
including lead
48,400 yd3
(soil and
sludge)
600 yd3
(sediment)
Provision of an alternate water supply to 13
residences; and GW monitoring
Installation of dual-activated carbon
adsorption units or continued maintenance of
existing carbon units at affected homes
until a permanent clean water supply is
developed; implementation of periodic
sampling at potentially affected homes;
construction of a new uncontaminated water
supply to serve affected and potentially
affected homes and businesses; and periodic
sampling of residences outside the affected
area
Excavating and incinerating soil and sludge
followed by backfilling ash residue onsite,
with possible solidification prior to onsite
disposal; covering backfilled area and
revegetating, capping other source areas and
revegetating; conducting test burns; treat-
ing and disposing of scrubber wastes from
thermal treatment; implementing institu-
tional controls and access restrictions; GW
and SW monitoring; and establishing ACLs for
GW
Remedy prevents exposure to
concentrations of TCE in
excess of Federal, State,
and local health-based ARARs
GW will meet SDWA MCLs or an
excess cancer-risk level
less than 10~5 if an MCL
has not been developed for a
particular chemical. Target
cleanup levels for GW
include TCE 5 ug/1 (MCL) and
PCM.66 ug/1 (based on a
10~° cancer risk)
Soil will be treated if it
exceeds a 10~° cancer-risk
level. GW standards will be
ACLs and will be established
at maximum existing concen-
trations for monitoring
wells. ACLs include benzene
2,000 ug/1, toluene
2,300 ug/1, vinyl chloride
1,200 ug/1, phenols
7.1 ug/1, and lead
227 ug/1. If GW concentra-
tions exceed ACLs, remedia-
tion may be necessary. Lead
emissions into the air will
not exceed NAAQS and State
air quality standards, set
at 1.5 ug/nr (on a
quarterly average)
$106,000
(present
worth)
$3,400
(annual O&M
years 1-30)
$1,260,000
(present
worth)
$80,000
(annual O&M)
$39,430,000-
$53,769,000
(present
worth)
$0
(O&M)
$150,000
(5-year
revi ew
present
worth)
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Region Remedial Action
Threat/Problem
Waste Volume
Components of
Selected Remedy
Cleanup Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
III . Havertown PCP, PA SW contaminated with 200 drums
VOCs including (soil and
Wood Treatment benzene, toluene, and oily debris)
Facility TCE; other organics
including phenols, 6,000 gals
09/29/89 dioxins, PCP, and (wastewater)
PAHs; metals
1st including chromium;
and oils
III
a>
III
Hebelka Auto
Salvage Yard,
20-Acre
Automobi1e
Disposal Area
03/31/89
1st
Henderson Road,
PA
Industrial
Landfill
09/29/89
2nd - Final
PA
Soil and debris
(battery casings)
contaminated with
metals including lead
5,000 yd3
(soil)
1,000 yd3
(debris)
The injection well
operable unit is
contaminated with
VOCs including PCE,
TCE, toluene, and
benzene; and other
organics including
PAHs
2,735 yd3
(soil)
5,230 yd3
(debris)
2,500,000
gals
(leachate)
Offsite land disposal of drums filled with
soil and oily debris; offsite treatment and
disposal of wastewater stored onsite in
tanks; soil monitoring; installation and
operation of an oil/water separator at the
storm sewer effluent point to SW; multi-
media monitoring; and .implementation of site
access restrictions
Excavation and onsite fixation of soil
followed by offsite disposal; excavation and
recycling of battery casings; and soil
backfilling and revegetation
Installation of erosion controls, regrading
and capping, including possibly moving the
onsite water main; installation of a short-
and long-term leachate collection system
with treatment and discharge to be
determined; excavation and movement of
trash, soil, and cinder currently located at
the adjacent Turnpike property, to the
Henderson Road site, with appropriate
remediation of wastes left in place at the
Turnpike property; further sample collection
in the western portion of the site to
determine treatment and/or capping in that
area, and contingent GW recovery; GW and
leachate monitoring; and implementation of
institutional controls
Cleanup goals are based on a
ID"6 risk level. Specific
SW cleanup goals include
reducing the discharge of
PCP-contaminated oil to
nearby creek to less than
5 mg/1 and reduci ng the VOC
concentrations by 17%
Soil will be excavated down
to a lead concentration of
560 mg/kg based on health-
risk calculations which
consider a safe soil
ingestion scenario
Cleanup goal for soil is
based on depth of soil
rather than concentration
level. GW standards include
benzene 5.0 ug/1 (MCL),
toluene 2,000 ug/1 (PMCL),
PCE 5.0 ug/1 (PMCL), TCE
5.0 ug/1 (MCL) and PAHs
2.5 ug/1 (CLP detection
limit)
$1,158,200
(present
worth)
$110,000
(O&M years
1-5)
$45,000
(O&M years
6-30)
$6,073,436
$6,884,652
(present
worth)
(O&M)
$7,265,000
(present
worth)
$213,260
(annual O&M)
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Suntary Table
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Region Remedial Action
Threat/Problem
Waste Volume
Components of
Selected Remedy
Cleanup Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&H Costs
III
Kimberton Site,
PA
Industrial
Facility
06/30/89
2nd - Final
GH and SW
contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
and DCE
Not specified Continued provision of alternate water
supplies through GAC treatment system and/or
potable water supply storage tanks; GW
pumping and treatment using air stripping
with onsite discharge to an adjacent stream;
GW monitoring; SW collection and treatment
using air stripping; and implementation of
institutional controls restricting GW use
GW remediation goal is to $2,630,000
achieve natural background (present
conditions. GW will worth)
gradually meet MCLs
including TCE 5 ug/1 and DCE $175,000
7 ug/1. SW will meet AWQC (annual O&M)
including TCE 21,900 -
45,000 ug/1 and DCE
11,600 ug/1. Air emissions
from air stripping will
comply with State air toxic
guidelines
III M.W. Manufac-
turing, PA
^ Industrial
at Facility
03/31/89
1st
III New Castle
Spill, DE
Former Manufac-
turing Facility
09/28/89
1st - Final
III Ordnance Works
Disposal Areas,
WV
Chemi cal
Facilities
09/29/89
1st (Amendment)
Soil contaminated
with VOCs including
PCE and TCE; other
organics including
PCBs; and metals
including lead
GW contaminated with
tris (2-chloro-
propyl)- phosphate
875 yd3
(waste pile
and soil)
Not specified
Soil and sediment
contaminated with
organics including
cPAHs; and metals
including arsenic and
lead
13,885 yd3
(soil)
Excavation of carbon waste pile and
underlying soil with transportation to an
offsite incineration facility and disposal
of ash in a RCRA landfill
Natural attenuation; GW, SW, and sediment
monitoring; and implementation of
institutional controls restricting further
well installation in the shallow aquifer
Excavation and onsite treatment of
inorganic-contaminated soil using solidi-
fication, followed by placement of treated
soil in landfill before capping; installing
RCRA cap on landfill, regrading, and revege-
tation; excavation of organic-contaminated
soil and sediment with onsite treatment by
bioremediation; GW, SW and sediment
monitoring; and implementation of deed
restrictions
Soil excavation will be $2,061,000
based on visible contami- (capital)
nation. Carcinogens will be
treated to < 2 ug/kg for $0
individual contaminants, (annual O&M)
which corresponds to the
10~4 to 10~5 risk range
Because there are no ARARs $466,147
for tris (2-chloropropyl)- (present
phosphate, EPA has estab- worth)
lished a TBC criterion of
4.4 mg/1 which is based on $25,000
an average daily intake of (O&M)
0.125 mg/kg/day of tris
(2-chloropropyl)-phosphate
Cleanup goals for $8,332,000
carcinogens are based on a (present
10~° excess risk level and worth)
include cPAHs 44.7 mg/kg,
arsenic 88.8 mg/kg, and lead
500 mg/kg
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
to
Regi on
III
III
III
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Publicker/
Cuyahoga
Wrecking, PA
37-Acre
Abandoned
Manufacturing
Facility
06/30/89
1st
Reeser's
Landfill, PA
15-Acre
Municipal/
Industrial
Landfill
03/30/89
1st - Final
Strasburg
Landfill, PA
222-Acre
Industrial/
Municipal
Landfill
06/29/89
1st
Threat/Problem
Soil and GW con-
taminated with VOCs
and other organics
including PCBs and
pesticides
None
GW and SW contami-
nated with VOCs
including TCE, PCE,
toluene, and xylenes
Components of
Waste Volume Selected Remedv
852,275 gals Off site treatment and disposal of waste
(waste streams in RCRA-permi tted facilities;
stream) demolition of above-ground process lines
with proper packaging of contaminated
20 yd^ insulation and onsite storage pending
(debris) disposition in a subsequent remedial action;
and offsite disposal of hazardous chemicals
recovered from within the lines
Not No action remedy with GW review within five
applicable years
Not specified Leachate collection with an interceptor
drain and offsite treatment; and provision
of an alternate water supply using point-
of-use activated carbon treatment system
Cleanup Goals
The selected remedy will
stabilize the site and
remove the threat associated
with fire and/or explosion
by removing and disposing of
waste streams offsite. No
chemical -specific goals were
provided
Not applicable
Treated GW concentrations
for carcinogenic contami-
nants will be such that the
aggregate carcinogenic risk
would be <10-°. Target GW
concentrations for non-
carcinogenic contaminants
will ensure an HI <1. MCLs
are ARARs and may be con-
sidered target levels.
Because of an ARAR waiver
for leachate, no chemical -
specific cleanup goals were
specified for leachate seep
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$13,900,000
(capital)
$0
(O&M)
Not specified
$42,850
(capital)
$4,500
(annual O&M)
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
Reaion
III
III
IV
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Whi tmoyer
Laboratories, PA
Industrial
Facility
06/30/89
1st
Wildcat
Landfill, DE
2.7-Acre
Landfill Pond
11/28/88
2nd - Final
Aberdeen
Pesticide Dumps/
Fairway Six, NC
Pesticide
Disposal Site
06/30/89
1st
Threat/Problem
Concentrated liquids
contaminated with
VOCs including PCE
and metals including
arsenic
Sediment and GW
contaminated with
metals including
arsenic, chromium,
and lead
Soil and debris
contaminated with
organics including
pesticides
Components of
Waste Volume Selected Remedy
69,000 gals Consolidating, transporting off site, and
(concentrated! treating concentrated liquid wastes using
iquid wastes) thermal treatment, biodegradation, or
recycling at a RCRA-permi tted facility,
followed by disposal of treated water in
off site SW and disposal of solid residuals
in an off site landfill; decontaminating
tanks and piping to meet RCRA closure
standards; and treating and disposing of
cleaning agent residuals off site at
RCRA-permi tted f aci 1 i ti es
Not specified Draining, filling and revegetating pond;
constructing a new pond onsite; implementing
institutional controls including land use
restrictions; and GW monitoring
22,000 yd' Excavating and homogenizing pesticide-
(soil and contaminated wastes with onsite
debris) incineration; reinjecting process wastewater
or scrubber blowdown into thermal treatment
facility; analyzing ash residues with onsite
redisposal; and air emissions monitoring
Cleanup Goals
This interim remedial action
will comply with ARARs;
however, chemical -specific
cleanup levels were not
provided
Remedy will ensure Federal
water quality criteria are
not exceeded when dis-
charging SW. Quantitative
cleanup goals are not
applicable
The air pollution control
system will achieve per-
formance standards which are
defined as hydrogen chloride
<4 pds/hr and parti cul ate
matter of <0.08 grains/dry
.ft-3 in the exhaust gas
connected to 7% oxygen
content
Present
Worth/
Capital and
0&M Costs
$475,000
'(capital)
$0
(08M)
Not specified
(remedy will
be
implemented
as part of
first
operable unit
construction)
$14,533,000
(present
worth)
$0
(O&M)
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Region Remedial Action
Threat/Problem
Waste Volume
Components of
Selected Remedy
Cleanup Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
IV
IV
IV
American Creosote Sludge, structures
(Jackson Plant),
TN
Wood Preserving
Facility
01/05/89
1st
and debris, and
tanked liquids
contaminated with
VOCs and other
organics including
phenols and PAHs
American Creosote Soil contaminated
(Pensacola
Plant), FL
Former Wood
Preserving
Facility
09/28/89
2nd
with organics
including PAHs,
dioxins, and PCP
Amnicola Dump, TN Soil, debris, and GW
contaminated with
organics including
PAHs and metals
including chromium
18-Acre Disposal
Area
03/30/89
1st - Final
115,000 gals Consolidation and incineration of sludge
(sludge) around the buildings and tanks; on- or
offsite incineration of oils and sludge from
25,000 gals the tanks; onsite treatment of tanked
(oil) process liquids using a sand filter, filter
press, and carbon adsorption unit followed
500,000 gals by discharge to SW; decontamination and
(tanked offsite disposal of site structures;
liquids) construction of a flood-protection dike;
fencing; and site stabilization pending
final remedy including monitoring onsite
water levels behind the dikes; pumping,
treatment (if needed), and discharge of
impounded water; and implementation of
institutional controls including deed
restrictions
23,000 yd^ Excavating and treating soil using solid-
Surface phase bioremediation in an onsite land
soil) treatment area followed by onsite disposal;
implementing temporary erosion control
measurese, to preserve SW quality; filling
and leveling land treatment area with
clean fill; collecting leachate and spraying
over treatment area to moisten soil; oxygen,
pH, nutrient and soil moisture content
monitoring, and implementing land and GW use
restrictions
400 yd^ Excavation and screening of contaminated
(soil) soil and debris, followed by onsite
solidification/fixation and onsite disposal;
200 ycr GW monitoring; conducting a public health
(debris) assessment five years after completion; and
imposing institutional controls including
land and GW use restrictions
Remedy is geared towards
reducing potential for
direct exposure to sludge
and process liquids while
further information is
gathered and analyzed.
Quantitative goals were not
provided for final site
remediation
Soil cleanup levels are
based on cancer potency
factors and a 10~"5 excess
cancer risk for
carcinogens. Soil cleanup
goals include cPHAs 50 mg/kg
(based on risk assessment
and persistence in the
envi ronment), dioxi ns
2.5 ug/kg (based on modified
CPF), and PCP 30 mg/kg
Soil will be treated to the
health-based level of
100 mg/kg for total cPAHs.
GW will meet ACLs including
chloroform 86 ug/1 and
chromium 890 ug/1 through GW
use restrictions
$5,000,000
$6,000,000
(present
worth)
O&M not
specified
$2,275,000
(present
worth)
$319,000
(OSM)
$640,000
(present
worth)
$384,000
(total O&M)
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Region Remedial Action
Threat/Problem
Waste Volume
Components of
Selected Remedy
Cleanup Goals
Present
Worth/
Capita] and
OSH Costs
IV
Cape Fear Wood
Preserving, NC
Wood Treatment
Faci1i ty
06/30/89
1st - Final
Soil, sediment, GW,
and SW contaminated
with VOCs including
benzene; other
organics including
PAHs; and metals
including arsenic and
chromi urn
15,000 gals Offsite disposal at a RCRA landfill of CCA
(wastewater) salt crystals found in the drainage system
and solidified creosote; offsite disposal of
asbestos-containing pipe insulation at the
county solid waste facility; removal and
decontamination of onsite pipes and tanks;
excavation and onsite treatment of soil and
sediment using soil flushing as the
preferred alternative or a low thermal
desorption process to remove organics
followed by soil washing or
fixati on/stabi1izati on/solidifi cation to
address inorganics (a soil washing
treatability study will determine if the
preferred alternative would be appropriate)
followed by placement in excavated area and
revegetation; GW and SW pumping with onsite
treatment followed by offsite discharge at a
POTW or surface stream; sale or treatment of
CCA solution; and GW monitoring
Soil cleanup criteria in-
clude arsenic 94 tng/kg (risk
assessment), benzene
0.005 mg/kg (CLRQL), chromium
88 mg/kg (background), cPAHs
2.5 mg/kg (risk assessment)
and total PAHs 100 mg/kg
(background); for sediment,
total PAHs 3 mg/kg (EPA-
established biota protection
level), arsenic 94 mg/kg
(risk assessment), and
chromium 88 mg/kg (back-
ground); and for GW, benzene
5 ug/1 (MCL), cPAHs 10 ug/1
(CLRQL), and noncarcinogenic
PAHs 14,350 ug/1 (risk
assessment); for SW, arsenic
12 ug/1 (AWQL), chromium
11 ug/1 (AWQL), and copper
14 ug/1 (background)
$14,370,000
$14,910,000
(present
worth)
$1,020,000 -
$1,310,000
(present
worth OSM
years 1-30)
IV
IV
Carol awn, SC GW contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
Abandoned Waste and metals including
Storage and lead
Disposal Facility
09/27/89
1st
Celanese
(Shelby Fiber
Operations), NC
Waste Disposal
Site
03/28/89
2nd - Final
Soil, stream sedi-
ment, sludge, and
other waste con-
taminated with VOCs
including benzene and
TCE; other organics
including phenols and
PAHs; and metals
including lead and
chromi urn
Not specified GW pumping and treatment using one or more
of the following methods: air stripping,
biodegradation, activated carbon filtration,
and metals removal, wi th method selecti on
based on contaminant level found and the
treated GW discharge point selected;
plugging condemned wells; disposing two
inactive incinerators and two remaining
drums; GW and soil monitoring, and
implementing deed restriction
110 yd3 Excavation of soil, sediment, GRU sludge,
(sediment) and other wastes with onsite incineration of
contaminated soil and GRU sludge and
1,800 yd-3 chemical fixation (solidification) of
(sludge) incinerator ash, burn pit residue, stream
sediment, and other wastes followed by
1,800 yd3 onsite disposal of inert solidified
(other material; regrading excavated area; and GW
wastes) monitoring
GW will meet SDWA MCLs.
Target cleanup levels
include TCE 5 ug/1 and lead
5 ug/1
The selected remedy will
attain a 10~" cancer-risk
level as it removes the
source of GW contamination.
No chemical-specific goals
were provided
$1,141,071 -
$1,356,305
(present
worth)
$753,433 -
$916,723
(present
worth OSM
years 1-30)
$3,500,000
(present
worth)
O&M not
specified
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Region Remedial Action
Threat/Problem
Waste Volume
Components of
Selected Remedy
Cleanup Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
IV
w
IV
IV
Chemtroni cs, NC
1,027-Acre
Waste Disposal
Faci1i ty
04/26/89
1st (Amendment)-
Final
Ci ba-Gei gy
(Mclntosh
Plant), AL
Manufacturing
Facility
09/28/89
1st
Soil, sediment, GW,
and SW contaminated
with VOCs including
TCE, PCE, toluene,
and benzene; other
organics including
PCBs and pesticides;
metals including
chromium and lead;
and explosives
GW contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene and toluene;
other organics
including pesticides;
and metals including
arsenic
GW
Kassauf-Kimerling Soil, debris, and
Battery, FL contaminated with
metals including
1-Acre Landfill arsenic, cadmium, and
lead
03/31/89
1st
Not specified
Not specified
11,350 yd3
(soil and
debris)
Multi-layer capping'of disposal areas; GW
pumping and treatment using air stripping,
carbon adsorption, or metal removal with
treatment and discharge to be determined
during design; SW treatment using GW
treatment system and onsite disposal of
sediment; sediment, GW, and SW monitoring;
and implementation of institutional controls
and access restrictions
No further action beyond continued GW
pumping and treatment using an existing
biological wastewater treatment system,
followed by discharge to SW; and GW and
effluent monitoring
Excavation of landfill wastes and underlying
soil followed by solidification/chemical
fixation and onsite disposal in the landfill
GW cleanup levels are based $2,248,900
on MCLs/PMCLs and several (present
TBCs. Individual goals worth)
include: TCE 0.005 mg/1
(MCL), benzene 0.005 mg/1 $501,900
(MCL), PCE 0.007 mg/1 (RSD), (annual O&M)
toluene 2.0 mg/1 (PMCLG),
RDX 0.035 mg/1 (USAIWQC),
TNT 0.044 mg/1 (PPLV), lead
0.05 mg/1 (TSCA), and
chromium 0.05 mg/1.
Individual soil cleanup
goals include PCBs 10 mg/kg,
RDX 95 mg/kg, TNT 305 mg/kg,
and CS 43.3 mg/kg (PPLV)
GW cleanup goals will be $0
attained by continued use of (capital)
the existing GW pumping and
treatment system. GW $325,000
cleanup goals include (annual O&M)
benzene 5 ug/1 (MCL),
toluene 2,000 ug/1 (PMCL),
and arsenic 50 ug/1 (MCL)
Soil and debris in the $2,500,000
source area will be treated $3,500,000
to meet RCRA criteria (present
including EP toxicity worth)
concentrations. GW will
meet MCLs and AWQC over a O&M not
short period of time due to specified
excavation and fixation of
the landfill materials
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Sunwary Table
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Region Remedial Action
Threat/Problem
Waste Volume
Components of
Selected Remedy
Cleanup Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&H Costs
IV
IV
IV
Newsom Brothers/ Soil, sediment, and
Old Reichhold, MS bulked wastes
contaminated with
Wood Preserving organics including
Facility PAHs, PCBs, and PCP;
and metals
09/18/89
1st - Final
Smith's Farm, KY
80-Acre
Hazardous Waste
Disposal Area
09/29/89
1st
Soil and sediment
contaminated with
organics including
PAHs and PCBs; and
metals including lead
Stauffer Chemical
(Cold Creek
Plant), AL
Chemi cal
Manufacturing
Facility
09/27/89
09/27/89
GW contaminated with
VOCs including carbon
tetrachloride and
other organics
including pesticides
30,300 yd3 Excavation and offsite disposal of
(soil) contaminated soil and sediment; excavation
and offsite incineration of waste materials
7,300 yd3 and any soil/sediment containing RCRA
(sediment) hazardous waste, followed by offsite
disposal; draining, filling, and capping
650 yd3 onsite ponds; recontouring site; and GW
(waste monitoring
material)
26,200 yd3 Site remediation is divided into 2 areas,
(soil) Area A and Area B and includes excavation
and onsite incineration of soil; sediment,
5,200 yd3 debris, and fill material from Area B;
(sediment) solidification/fixation of approximately 50%
of treated material followed by onsite
placement of all treated material in Area B;
incineration of a small amount of hotspot
material and consolidation in Area A;
construction of RCRA cap over Area A;
construction of a leachate collection
system; maintenance of RCRA cap and leachate
collection system; leachate removal and
disposal for 30 years; GW monitoring; and
implementation of site access restrictions
Not specified Continued operation of the existing
intercept/treatment system; installation of
additional extraction/monitoring wells;
modification of treatment system; and
monitoring of effluent, GW concentrations,
and pumping rates
Soil, sediment, and waste
material cleanup goals are
based on a 10"" excess
cancer risk. Goals include
cPAHs 10 mg/kg and PCP
1.2 mg/kg
Action levels for contami-
nated soil and/or sediment
are based on an excess
lifetime cancer risk of
10~5 with the exception of
lead, which was based on an
HI <1.0. Chemi cal-specific
goals include cPAHs 5 mg/kg,
PCBs 2 mg/kg, and lead
500 mg/kg
GW cleanup levels are based
on SDWA MCLs or RfDs and
include carbon tetrachloride
5 ug/1 (MCL)
$14,180,000
(present
worth)
$520,225
(present
worth O&M)
$26,900,000
(present
worth)
$1,330,000
(O&M)
$3,119,200
(capi tal)
O&M
not specified
1st
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
01
Reaion
IV
IV
V
V
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Stauffer Chemical
(LeMoyne Plant),
AL
Chemi cal
Manufacturing
Facility
09/27/89
1st
Sydney Mine
Sludge Ponds, FL
Former Waste
Disposal Pits
09/29/89
1st - Final
Adrian Municipal
Well Field, MN
Municipal Well
Field
09/29/89
1st - Final
A! sco Anaconda,
OH
4.8-Acre Former
Sludge Disposal
Area
09/08/89
1 cf
1 b L
Threat/Probl em
GW contaminated with
VOCs including carbon
tetrachloride and
other organics
including pesticides
GW contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene, toluene, TCE
and xylenes
Soil and GW
contaminated with
petrol eum-rel ated
rel eases
Soil and sludge
contaminated with
organics including
PCBs; and metals
including chromium,
cyanide, and arsenic
Components of
Waste Volume Selected Remedy
Not specified Continued operation of the existing
intercept/treatment system; installation of
additional extraction/monitoring wells;
modification of treatment system; and
monitoring of effluent, GW concentrations,
and pumping rates
Not specified Remedy includes continued GW pumping and
onsite treatment by air stripping and spray
irrigation on land adjacent to the disposal
pits; evaluation of existing GW pumping and
treatment system with implementation of any
necessary modifications; GW monitoring, and
implementation of deed and GW use
restrictions
Not No further action will be taken by the
applicable Superfund program because the program does
not have the authority to address cleanup of
petroleum releases. EPA will transfer the
site to its UST program for further action
8,870 yd3 Excavating sludge contaminated with
(soil and >500 mg/kg of PCBs followed by off site
sludge) incineration and disposal; excavating sludge
and soil contaminated with <500 mg/kg of
PCBs followed by off site treatment and
disposal or reuse; backfilling and
revegetating excavated areas; and
implementing institutional controls
including site access and deed restrictions
Cleanup Goals
GW cleanup levels are based
on SDWA MCLs or RfDs and
include carbon tetrachloride
5 ug/1 (MCL)
Cleanup goals were set
according to State drinking
water standards and SDWA
MCLs and PMCLs.
Chemical-specific cleanup
goals include benzene 1 ug/1
(PDWS) and toulene 2,000
ug/1 (PMCL)
Not applicable
Soil cleanup goals will meet
clean closure levels, which
require soil and sludge to
be excavated until remaining
soil contaminant concen-
trations attain a cumulative
HI value <1 for critical
effect. Chemical-specific
cleanup goals were not
specified, but will be
established during the
remedial design
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs .
$3,119,200
( capi tal )
O&M
not specified
$2,448,000
(present
worth)
$576,000
(annual O&M)
$0
(present
worth)
$0
(O&M)
$4,161,066
(capital)
$0
(O&M)
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Region Remedial Action
Threat/Problem
Waste Vol
Components of
Selected Reinedv
Cleanup Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
0«H Costs
Soil contaminated
with organics
including PAHs; and
metals including
arsenic, chromium,
and lead
Auto Ion
Chemicals, HI
Industrial Waste
Treatment
Faci 1 i ty
09/27/89
1st
Big D Soil and GW con-
Campground, OH taminated with VOCs
including PCE and
1.2-Acre Landfill TCE; other organics;
and metals including
09/29/89 chromium and lead
1st - Final
Bowers Landfill, Soil, sediment,
7,200 yd3
(soil)
OH
Municipal/
Industrial
Landfill
03/24/89
1st - Final
Byron Salvage
Yard, IL
Waste Disposal/
Dumping Area
06/30/89
3rd
debris, and GW
contaminated with
VOCs including PCE
and benzene; other
organics including
PAHs and PCBs; metals
including lead and
chromium; and other
inorganics
GW contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene, PCE, and
TCE; metals including
arsenic, chromium,
and lead; and other
organics including
cyanide
2,500-5,000
(drums)
25,000-
30,000 yd3
(soil)
40,000,000 -
60,000,000
gals (GW)
Not specified
Excavation and offsite stabilization of
contaminated soil, followed by offsite
disposal of treated soil; and replacement of
excavated soil with clean fill
Not specified
Removing and incinerating drums, bulk
wastes, and soil followed by onsite disposal
of nonhazardous ash residues; GW pumping and
treatment using GAC followed by onsite
discharge to SW; GW and SW monitoring; and
implementing deed and land use restrictions
Removal of surface vegetation and debris,
followed by offsite disposal at a hazardous
waste landfill or a solid waste landfill;
erosion controls including surface regrading
in areas prone to flooding and erosion;
excavation and dewatering of drainage ditch
sediment followed by onsite disposal;
replacement of discharge pipe; construction
of a soil and clay cap; GW monitoring; and
implementation of site access and GW use
restri cti ons
Removing wastes generated during the
remedial investigation; covering, regrading,
and revegetating surface; GW and SW moni-
toring; plugging and abandoning monitoring
wells no longer in use; providing an
alternate source of drinking water by
extending the water main of the municipal
system; and implementing institutional
controls including GW use and deed
restrictions
Soil will be treated to meet $3,332,988
a total carcinogenic risk (capital)
level of 10"6 and must
pass the TCLP test before $5,900
offsite disposal. Indi- (annual O&M)
vidual contaminant goals
were not specified
Remedial action will reduce $39,000,000
health risks identified in (present
GW to an HI <.1.0 and a worth)
cumulative carcinogenic risk
of 10~6 or less. GW $320,000
cleanup goals are based on (annual O&M)
MCLs and include TCE 5 ug/1
and chromium 50 ug/1
Chemical-specific cleanup $4,300,000
goals were not provided; (present
however, cleanup levels will worth)
be based on MCLs where
available and a 10"° $116,000
cancer risk for all other (annual O&M
contaminants years 1-30)
Cleanup levels will be based $1,100,000
on ACLs, which will be set (present
at contaminant concentra- worth)
tions currently found in the
aquifers. AWQC and/or State $16,000
water quality standards will (annual O&M)
be attained in nearby pond
and river
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
Recrion
V
V
V
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Cemetary Dump, MI
Former Chemical
Dumping Area
09/29/89
2nd - Final
Cliffs/Dow Dump,
MI
Tar Waste
Disposal Area
09/27/89
1st - Final
Cross Brothers
Pail (Pembroke),
IL
Drum and Pail
Recycling
Facility
09/28/89
1st - Final
Threat/Problem
None
Soil contaminated
with VOCs including
benzene, toluene,
PCE, and xylenes; and
other organics
including PAHs and
phenol
Soil and GW con-
taminated with VOCs
including benzene,
PCE, TCE, toluene,
and xylenes; and
other organics
including PCBs
Components of
Waste Volume Selected Remedy
Not No further action is necessary because
applicable previous remedial activities appear to
provide adequate protection. GW will be
monitored annually to ensure the site
continues to pose no threat to human health
9,600 yd3 Excavation and off site incineration of 200
(tar waste) yd'-' of exposed tars; excavation and
biological treatment of 9,400 yd3 of
residual contaminated fill material followed
by off site incineration of 200 yd3 of
buried tars; in-situ bi odegradati on of
residual contaminated fill material;
installation of a soil cover and
revegetation of bioremediated fill area; GW
and air monitoring; and implementation of
deed restrictions to prevent new well
installation and disturbance of the fill
materi al s
33,880 yd3 Resampling PCB-contaminated soil followed by
(soil) excavation and off site incineration of soil
with a PCB level >1Q rag/kg; covering a
10-acre portion of the site; GW pumping and
treatment with onsite discharge to VOC-
contami nated soil area for soil flushing;
GW monitoring; and implementation of deed
and access restrictions
Cleanup Goals
Not applicable
GW contaminant levels, which
are already below levels of
concern, will further
decrease through
bi odegradati on and natural
attenuation. No chemical-
specific goals were provided
for source control
GW cleanup goals will meet
MCLs, not exceed a 10~6
lifetime cancer risk, and
attain an HI ratio
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Suwwary Table
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Region Remedial Action
Threat/Problen
Waste Volume
Components of
Selected Renedv
Cleanuo Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
E,H. Schilling Soil, sediment, and
Landfill, OH GW contaminated with
VOCs including
2.7-Acre Landfill benzene; other
organics including
09/29/89 phenol, PAHs, and
pesticides; and
1st - Final metals including
arsenic
30,0-00 yd3
(subsurface
soil under
landfill)
750 yd3
(surface
soil to be
excavated)
70,000 yd3
(solid waste
beneath
landfill)
500 yd3
(sediment to
be excavated)
7,000,000
gals
(leachate)
Excavation of sediment and soil for
consolidation in landfill; construction of
RCRA cap; construction of clay berm;
construction of a permimeter cut-off wall;
construction of interceptor drum; dewatering
the landfill of leachate and treating
leachate using air stripping and carbon
adsorption to remove organics and sulfide
precipitation to remove inorganics, followed
by discharge to SW; treatment and discharge
of additional wastewater generated during
remedial action; GW monitoring; and
implementation of site access and deed
restri cti ons
Soil and sediment will be $6,444,000
excavated and consolidated (capital)
to achieve a cumulative
carcinogenic risk <10~° $99,000
and a cumulative non- (annual O&M
carcinogenic HI <1.0. GW years 1-30)
will be treated if it
exceeds action levels that
have been established as a
cumulative cancer risk
<10~° and a cumulative
noncarcinogenic HI <1.0
Galesburg/
Koppers, IL
Wood Treatment
Facility
06/30/89
1st - Final
Hedblum
Industries, MI
Manufacturing
Facility
09/29/89
1st - Final
Soil and GW con-
taminated with
organics including
phenols, PCP, and
PAHs
GW contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene, toluene,
xylenes, TCE, and
PCE; and metals
including lead
15,200 yd3 Excavation and onsite consolidation with
(soil) onsite biological treatment of soil;
implementation of a biological monitoring
program; construction of shallow GW inter-
ceptor trenches and deep pumping wells with
GW pumping and pretreatment using existing
wastewater treatment system, followed by
discharge to a POTW; GW monitoring; and
implementation of access and land use
restrictions
Not specified GW pumping and treatment using activated
carbon adsorption with discharge to the
bayou; and GW and soil monitoring
No chemical-specific soil
cleanup goals were estab-
lished. Soil will be
excavated 6" beyond visible
contamination and will be
treated to background
toxicity levels. GW cleanup
levels are based on a 10~°
excess carcinogenic risk goal
Cleanup goals will meet SDWA
MCLs. Specific goals
include benzene 5 ug/1, TCE
5 ug/1, and lead 50 ug/1
$4,286,844
(present
worth)
$170,012
(annual O&M)
$1,379,000
(present
worth)
$264,000
(annual O&M)
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Region Remedial Action
Threat/Problem
Waste Volume
Components of
Selected Remedy
Cleanup Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
-j
to
Industrial Excess Soil, sediment, GW,
Landfill, OH
Former Mixed
Industrial and
Refuse Landfill
07/17/89
2nd - Final
Ionia City
Landfill, MI
20-Acre
Industrial.
Commerci al
Municipal
Landfill
09/29/89
1st
Kysor
Industrial,
Industrial
Facility
09/29/89
1st - Final
and
MI
and air contaminated
with organics
including methane gas
and metals
256,000,000
gals (GW)
Soil and debris
contaminated with
VOCs including vinyl
chloride and methyl
chloride; other
organics; and metals
including chromium
5,000 yd3
(soil and
drummed
wastes)
Soil and GW con-
taminated with VOCs
including PCE,
toluene, xylenes, and
TCE; and metals
including chromium
Not specified
Capping landfill with RCRA cap; expanding
existing methane venting system; GW pumping
and treatment by air stripping, carbon
adsorption; and flocculation/
sedimentation/filtration to achieve
compliance with CWA discharge criteria;
treating SW from ponds and ditch, if
necessary; dredging and consolidating
sediment from ponds and ditch under the cap;
multi-media monitoring; and implementing
institutional controls restricting future
use of the site
In-situ vitrification of point source area;
GW monitoring; upgrading landfill cover;
implementing access and land use restrictions
GW pumping and treatment using carbon
adsorption and air stripping with vapor-
phase carbon adsorption followed by offsite
discharge to SW; in-situ soil vacuum extrac-
tion with air pollution control equipment;
GW monitoring; and implementation of site
access and GW and land use restrictions
Landfill gas concentrations
beyond the site will not
exceed 5% methane. GW
cleanup is based a 10~°
excess cancer risk level and
will be treated to achieve
SDWA MCLs in the aquifer and
discharged in compliance
with CWA NPDES requirements.
Specific GW cleanup goals
include benzene 5 ug/1 and
vinyl chloride 2 ug/1
Target cleanup levels for
the soil-matrix to determine
extent of excavation will
not be established; instead,
the extent of excavation
will be based on the extent
of buried drums and results
of additional sampling
GW cleanup goals are derived
from State and SDWA MCL
standards. Specific goals
include PCE 1 ug/1, xylenes
440 ug/1, toluene 40 ug/1,
TCE 5 ug/1, and chromium
(hexavalent) 50 ug/1. Soil
cleanup goals are derived
from State and RCRA
standards. Specific goals
include xylenes 141 mg/kg,
toluene 724 mg/kg, and TCE
0.07 mg/kg
$18,548,000
(present
worth)
$440,000
(annual O&M)
$3,630,525
(present
worth)
$112,750
(annual O&M
year 1)
$51,000
(annual O&M
years 2-10)
$16,000,000
(present
worth)
$5,000,000
(present
worth O&M)
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Reoion Remedial Action
Threat/Probl ea_
Waste Volume
Components of
Selected Remedy
Cleanup Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&H Costs
Laskin/Poplar Soil, structures, and Not specified
Oil, OH debris contaminated
with organics in-
Waste Oil eluding PCBs, PAHs,
Disposal Facility dioxin, and pesti-
cides; and metals
06/29/89 including lead
3rd - Final
^ V MIDCO I, IN
o Industrial Waste
Recycling,
Storage, and
Disposal Facility
06/30/89
1st - Final
Soil, sediment, and
GW, contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene, toluene and
TCE; other organics
including PCBs,
phenols, and PAHs;
metals including
chromium and lead
12,400 yd3
(soil)
1,200 yd3
(sediment)
Draining onsite freshwater and retention
ponds with offsite discharge and refilling;
thermally treating contaminated soil, ash,
and debris with either onsite disposal of
ash or offsite disposal in RCRA landfill;
demolishing and thermally treating or decon-
taminating dioxin-contaminated structures;
constructing an up-gradient GW diversion
trench; capping, GW and SW monitoring; and
implementing access and land use restrictions
Treatment of soil and subsurface materials
using a combination of vapor extraction and
solidification/stabilization followed by
onsite disposal; excavation and onsite
solidification/stabilization of sediment in
wetlands; and covering the site in
accordance with RCRA landfill closure
requirements. GW will be recovered and
handled in one of the following ways:
1) deep well injection without treatment if
EPA grants a petition to allow land disposal
of waste prohibited under RCRA; 2) if a
petition is not approved, GW will be treated
using air stripping and a liquid-phase
granular activated carbon polish system,
followed by deep well injection; or
3) treatment for hazardous substances
followed by reinjection into the aquifer in
a manner that will prevent spreading of the
salt plume; and implementation of site
access and deed restrictions
No specific cleanup goals $11,000,000
were provided; however, (present
remediation goals, will worth)
prevent exposure to soil and
debris exceeding a 10~° $1,000,000
cancer-risk level or a total (present
HI >1 worth O&M)
Soil and sediment will be $10,728,000 -
treated if they exceed one $13,989,000
of the following risk-based (present
levels: cumulative lifetime worth)
carcinogenic risk equal to
10~°, cumulative chronic $188,000 -
noncarcinogenic index equal $525,000
to 1.0, or subchronic risk (annual O&M)
index equal to 1.0. GW will
be treated if it exceeds one Costs depend
of the following risk-based on whether
levels: cumulative lifetime GW is treated
cancer risk equal to 10~ ,
cumulative noncarcinogenic
index equal to 1.0,
subchronic risk equal to
1.0, MCLs, or chronic AWQC
multiplied by a 3.9 dilution
factor
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Region Remedial Action
Threat/Problem
Waste Volume
Components of
Selected Remedy
Present
Worth/
Capital and
MIDCO II, IN Soil and GW con-
taminated with VOCs
7-Acre Waste including benzene,
Storage and toluene, TCE and
Disposal Facility xylenes; other
organics including
06/30/89 PCBs; and metals
including arsenic,
1st - Final chromium, and lead
Miami County
Incinerator, OH
Incinerator/
Waste Disposal
Facility
06/30/89
1st - Final
Soil and GW con-
taminated with VOCs
including PCE,
toluene, and TCE;
other organics in-
cluding PCBs, PAHs,
dioxin, and pesti-
cides; and metals
including lead
35,000 yd3
(soil and
waste
materials)
500 yd3
(sediment)
104,000 -
150,000
barrel-
equivalents
(liquid
waste)
Treatment of soil and waste materials using
solidification/stabilization followed by
onsite disposal; excavation and onsite
solidification/stabilization of sediment;
covering site in accordance with RCRA
landfill closure requirements. GW will be
recovered and handled in one of the
following ways: 1) deep well injection
without treatment, if EPA grants a petition
to allow land disposal of waste prohibited
under RCRA; 2) if petition is not granted,
GW will be treated using air stripping and a
liquid phase granular activated carbon
polish system, followed by deep well
injection; or 3) treatment for hazardous
substances followed by reinjection into the
aquifer in a manner that will prevent
spreading of the salt plume; and
implementation of site access and deed
restrictions
Excavation and onsite consolidation of ash
wastes and soil into landfills with capping
of landfills and previously excavated areas;
GW pumping and treatment with discharge to
POTW; vapor/vacuum extraction of liquid
disposal area using carbon filters; con-
tinued testing of soil, ash, and tributary
sediment; provision of an alternate water
supply for area residents and businesses;
and implementation of deed and land use
restrictions
Soil and sediment will be
treated if they exceed one
of the following risk-based
levels: cumulative lifetime
carcinogenic risk equal to
ID"-3, cumulative chronic
non-carcinogenic index equal
to 1.0, or subchronic risk
index equal to 1.0. GW will
be treated if it exceeds a
10~s cancer-risk level,
cumulative non-carcinogenic
index equal to 1.0,
subchronic risk equal to
1.0, MCLs, or chronic AWQC
multiplied by a 3.6 dilution
factor
No chemical-specific cleanup
goals have been established
at this time. Cleanup
levels will be based on
MCLs, an HI of 1, a 10~5
cancer-risk level at the
waste boundary, and a 10~°
cancer-risk level at the
nearest receptor
$14,419,000 -
$18,596,400
(present
worth)
$301,000 -
$733,000
(annual O&M)
Costs depend
on whether
GW is treated
$19,400,000
(present
worth)
$4,666,000
(O&M)
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
V New Brighton/
Arden Hills
(TCAAP), MN
Federal Facility
Army Ammunition
Manufacturing
Plant
07/19/89
7th
V New Brighton/
0 Arden Hills, MN
Municipal Well
Field
08/11/89
4th (Amendment)
V Ninth Avenue
Dump, IN
Waste Disposal
Area
06/30/89
2nd - Final
Threat/Problen
Soil contaminated
with VOCs including
TCE and PCE; other
organics including
PCBs; and metals
including arsenic and
lead
None
Soil, sediment, fill
materi al , and GW
contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene, TCE, and
toluene; other
organics including
PAHs and PCBs; and
metals including lead
Waste Volume
1,400 yd3
(soil)
Not
applicable
36,000 yd3
(fill
material)
1,000-2,000
drums
(liquid
waste)
Components of
Selected Remedy
Onsite treatment of soil using mobile
infrared thermal treatment; analysis of
treated soil to ensure PCB treatment goal is
met, followed by onsite treatment; discharge
of treated scrubber wastewater to sani-
tary sewer system and ultimately to POTW;
decontamination and removal of equipment
used in treatment process; and air
monitoring during soil treatment
Amend June 1986 ROD by cancelling the
installation of a new municipal well
Excavation of oil -contaminated waste and
fill material with onsite thermal treatment,
followed by filling the excavated area with
incinerator and GW treatment process
residues, discarded drums, sediment, and
trench spoils; capping area contained by the
slurry wall; pumping and treatment of GW
inside slurry wall with reinjection into
slurry wall to promote soil flushing;
dismantling, decontaminating, and removing
oil storage unit constructed under first
O.U.; long-term GW monitoring; and
implementation of deed and access
restrictions
Cleanup Goals
Soil will be treated to
reach 2 mg/kg PCBs as
required under TSCA
Not applicable
Soil remedy is designed to
ensure long-term success of
the containment and GW
components. GW target
levels are based on MCLs or
a 10~5 risk level,
whichever is more stringent
for carcinogens; and MCLs,
MCLGs, or an HI of 1, which-
ever is more stringent, for
noncarcinogens
Present
Worth/
Capital and
08M Costs
$1,200,000
(total cost)
$0
(present
worth)
$0
(O&M)
$22,209,000
(present
worth)
$489,000
(annual O&M)
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
03
Reai on
V
V
V
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Northernaire
Plating, MI
Former
Electroplating
Facility
09/29/89
2nd - Final
Ott/Story/
Cordova
Chemical, MI
Industrial
Facility
09/29/89
1st
Outboard Marine,
IL
Marine Products
Manufacturing
Facility
03/31/89
1st (Amendment)
Threat/Problem
GW contaminated with
VOCs including
toluene, TCE, PCE,
and xylene; and
metals including
chromium
GW and SW con-
taminated with VOCs
including benzene,
PCE, TCE, toluene,
vinyl chloride, and
xylenes; other
organics including
PCBs and pesticides;
and metals including
arsenic
Soil and sediment
contaminated with
organics including
PCBs
Components of
Waste Volume Elected Remedy
Not specified Two-stage GW pumping and treatment system
using carbon adsorption to remove metals and
air stripping with vapor phase carbon
adsorption to remove VOCs, followed by dis-
charge to SW; GW monitoring; and implemen-
tation of site access and GW and land use
restrictions
Not specified GW pumping and treatment using UV-oxidation,
carbon adsorption, biological treatment
(activated sludge), and filtration with
discharge to SW; and environmental monitoring
700,000 Ibs Construction of containment cell and a new
(soil) slip; relocation of Larsen Marine; removal,
treatment, and onsite disposal of Slip 3
300,000 Ibs sediment exceeding 500 mg/kg PCB; dredging
(sediment) and disposal of harbor sediment above
50 mg/kg; excavation and onsite treatment of
soil and sediment exceeding 10,000 mg/kg
PCBs; construction of a west containment
cell for treatment residues and lower con-
centration PCB-contami nated soil; construc-
tion _ of an east containment cell around the
parking lot area; construction of a
temporary onsite water treatment facility
for dredged water; construction of a
permanent water treatment facility; onsite
treatment of containment cell water followed
by discharge to a POTW or an onsite loca-
tion; capping of all contaminant cells; and
GW monitoring
Cl eanuD Goal s
GW will meet or exceed State
and SDWA MCL standards.
Target GW cleanup levels
include xylene 440 ug/1 ,
toluene 40 ug/1, PCE 1 ug/1,
TCE 5 ug/1, and chromium
50 ug/1
Effluent levels will meet
State NPDES levels, which
are dependent on final
discharge point. ARARs
pertaining to GW restoration
will be addressed in a
subsequent overall GW
operable unit
A PCB cleanup goal of
50 mg/kg was established
based on site-specific data
Present
Worth/
Capital and
A0M frtdf
Uon LOStS
$16,000,000
(present
worth)
$5,000,000
(O&M years
1-60)
$11,751,000
(present
worth)
$1,500,000 -
$1,600,000
(annual O&M
years 1-5)
$19,000,000
(capital)
O&M not
specified
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
2
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
V Waite Park
Wells, MN
Municipal Wells
09/28/89
1st - Final
V Wauconda Sand &
Gravel , IL
52-Acre
Industrial/
Municipal
Commerci al /
Residential
j Landfill
03/31/89
2nd - Final
V Wausau Water
Supply, WI
Well Field
12/23/88
1st
GW contaminated with
VOCs including PCE
and TCE
GW, SW, and air
contaminated with
VOCs including vinyl
chloride and benzene;
metals including
arsenic and lead; and
methane
GW contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
Components of
Waste Volume Selected Reined v
Not specified Installation of GH extraction wells in the
contamination plumes; treatment of extracted
GW via packed tower aeration; discharge of
treated GW via storm drain to river; and SW
and GW monitoring
Not specified Long-term monitoring of GW, SW, and air
emissions with possible evaluation of addi-
tional remedial alternatives, if necessary;
further upgrade of site cap; installation
and operation of improved venting system;
continued O&M of leachate collection and
venting systems; maintenance of site cap,
fence, and monitoring well network; and
implementation of institutional controls to
restri ct GW use
Not specified GW pumping and treatment using air stripping
with onsite discharge to SW; and GW
monitoring
Cleanup Goals
Chemical -specific GW cleanup
goals include PCE 6.6 ug/1
(RAL) and TCE 5 ug/1 (MCL).
SW discharge will comply
with CWA AWQS. Chemical -
specific GW discharge goals
include PCE 8.9 ug/1 and TCE
123 ug/1
MCLs and State Public and
Food Processing standards
are considered ARARs for
off site GW quality. If
off site GW exceeds an MCL or
a 10~5 cumulative cancer-
risk level for lifetime
drinking water usage (ex-
cluding arsenic and vinyl
chloride) and background
levels, additional investi-
gations will be performed.
Leachate collection system
will operate until action
levels are established and
attained. Air emissions
will be controlled and
treated if incremental risk
to nearby residents is
>10~° lifetime exposure
Remedy addresses plume
management not remediation.
Effluent levels will satisfy
BAT
Present
Worth/
Capital and
08M Costs
$913,000
(present
worth cost)
O&M not
specofied
$12,155,606
(present
worth)
$174,500
(annual O&M)
$750,000
(present
worth)
$105,000
(annual O&M
year 1)
$81,000
(annual O&M
subsequent
years)
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
R.egipn
V
V
V
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Wausau Water
Supply, HI
Municipal Water
Supply Facility
09/29/89
2nd - Final
Wedzeb
Enterprises, IN
Industrial
Warehouse
Facility
06/30/89
1st - Final
Whitehall
Municipal Wells,
MI
Municipal Well
Fields
09/29/89
1st - Final
Threat/Problem
Soil and GW
contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
and PCE
Sewer sediment
contaminated with
organics including
PCBs
None
Components of
Waste Volume Selected Remedy
Not specified Treatment of soil using an in-situ soil
vapor extraction (SVE) system and treatment
of gases emitted from the SVE system using
vapor phase carbon filters; and continued GW
pumping and treatment using existing air
strippers with modified pumpage rates
Not specified Hydraulic flushing and vacuum pumping of
sewer lines followed by filtering the
resulting water and sediment and discharging
to POTW; off site incineration and disposal
of sediment and waste drums, if PCB levels
are 50 mg/kg or greater or off site disposal
only if PCB levels are below PCB 50 mg/kg;
and a television inspection of the pipeline
to ensure structural integrity
Not No further action is being taken because
applicable contaminant levels in the site's wells do
not exceed any State or Federal drinking
water standards or criteria
Cleanup Goals
Performance goals for this
remedial action are based on
State GW standards including
PCE 1.0 ug/1 and TCE 1.8 ug/1
The cleanup goal of 10 mg/kg
for PCBs was established by
the TSCA Spill Policy
Not applicable
Present
Worth/
Capital and
$738,000
(present
worth)
$482,000
(present
worth O&M)
$45,000
(present
worth)
$0
(O&M)
\ u**) >/
$0
(present
worth)
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Sunwary Table
Reai on
V
VI
VI
Site Kane,
State/Type
Signature Date/
i Remedial Action
Windom Dump, MN
Former Municipal
Landfill
09/29/89
let — Final
l o L r i net i
Homestake
Mining, NM
Uranium
Processing Mill
09/27/89
1st - Final
Motco, TX
Former Styrene
Tar Recycling
operation and
Former
Industrial
Chemical Waste
Disposal Facility
09/27/89
2nd - Final
Threat/Problem
GW contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene, PCE, and
TCE; metals including
arsenic; and other
inorganics
None
Soil, sediment, and
GW contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene; other
organics including
PAHs; and metals
including arsenic,
chromium, and lead
Waste Volume
Not specified
None
140,000 yd3
(soil and
sediment)
30,000,000 -
40,000,000
gals (GW in
transmissive
zone)
1,000,000 -
2,000,000
gals (dense,
nonagueous
phase
organic
liquids)
Components of
Selected Remedy
Grading, capping, and revegetating the fill
area; modifying the existing municipal waste
plant by installing additional aeration
nozzles and structure venting; and GW
monitoring
No action remedy. Tailing embankments not
found to be significant source of off site
radon
GW pumping and onsite treatment using BAT;
extraction and incineration of dense,
non-aqueous phase organic liquids;
installation of GW gradie.it control system;
implementation of GW compliance monitoring
of aquifers; excavation, consolidation, and
onsite containment of contaminated surface
and soil and sediment; and implementation of
site access and deed restrictions
Cleanup Goals
The municipal water treat-
ment system will remove VOCs
and will ensure that
contaminants of concern do
not exceed a 10~b lifetime
excess cancer risk and SDWA
MCLs. GW will be treated if
the GW exceeds a single
allowable limit. Specific
limits are based on State
solid waste management rules
and include TCE 7.8 ug/1,
PCE 1 .7 ug/1 , benzene
3.0 ug/1, and arsenic
12.5 ug/1
Not applicable
GW treatment is expected to
meet Federal and State
discharge standards; if
discharge standards are not
met, GW will be sent to a
wastewater treatment plant.
Cleanup goals for the upper
aquifer are SDWA MCLs or a
10~° cancer risk level.
Treatment of shallow GW will
be to health-based numbers
and include PAHs
0.0028 ug/1. Soil/sediment
excavation will be deter-
mined by a 10~° risk level
Present
Worth/
Capital and
0&M Costs
$865,000
(present
worth)
$5,700
(O&M years
1-30)
$0
(present
worth)
$8,810,000
(present
worth)
$453,000
(annual 6&M)
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Region Remedial Action
Threat/Problem
Waste Volume
Components of
Selected Remedy
Present
Worth/
Capital and
VI
VI
VI
Pesses Chemi cal,
TX
Industrial
Facility
12/22/88
1st - Final
Sheridan
Disposal
Services, TX
Commercial Waste
Soil, sludge, and
debris contaminated
with metals including
lead
Soil and sludge
contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene and toluene;
and other organics
Disposal Facility including PCBs
12/29/88
1st
16.6 yd3
(sludge)
Sheridan Disposal GW contaminated with
Services, TX VOCs including
benzene, PCE, and
Former Hazardous TCE; and metals
and Solid Waste including arsenic
Disposal Facility
09/27/89
2nd
13,000 yd3
(soil)
31,000 yd3
(sludge)
300 yd3
(floating
oil and
emulsion)
Consolidation of offsite contaminated soil
with onsite wastes and surface soil followed
by in-situ stabilization and installation of
a concrete cap over the fenced portion of
the site and a RCRA-clay cap placed in the
south field; decontamination of warehouse
with resultant solid wastes combined with
soil remediation and wastes treated and
discharged into sewer system; offsite
disposal of drums and equipment not
adequately cleaned; offsite disposal of
water not meeting discharge requirements;
and cleaning and sealing sumps
Excavation of all material with PCB concen-
trations >25 mg/kg including soil, sludge,
floating oil, and emulsion in the pond and
storage tanks. This will be followed by
onsite biotreatment of contaminated soil,
sludge, and oil with stabilization and
onsite disposal of residues in the pond. If
PCB concentrations in the residues are
<50mg/kg, they will be placed under a
RCRA-compliant cap. Residues containing
>50 mg/kg PCB will be placed in a
RCRA-compliant landfill in the pond area;
capping entire pond and dike area;
decontamination and offsite disposal of
tanks, drums, and debris; treatment to BAT
of any contaminated wastewater and storm
water with discharge to the river; GW
monitoring; and implementation of
institutional and engineering controls
Not specified Natural attenuation with GW and SW moni-
toring; implementation of GW use restric-
tions; and implementation of corrective
action plan if ACLs are exceeded in the
future
Soil will be treated to
attain cadmium 15 mg/kg and
nickel 100 mg/kg based on a
10"" carcinogenic
risk level
An action level for PCBs was
established at 25 mg/kg
based on a health-risk
analysis and TSCA Spill
Policy. Waste residues will
be disposed of according to
PCB levels
EPA has set ACLs for GW con-
taminants in order to meet
drinking water criteria in
SW. Chemical-specific ACL
concentrations include
benzene 26 mg/1, TCE
26 mg/1, PCE 41 mg/1, and
arsenic 260 mg/1
$1,200,000
(present
worth)
$7,000
(annual O&M)
$27,956,000
(present
worth)
$863,0000
(O&M)
$0
(present
worth)
$194,000
(O&M)
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Sunmary Table
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Rpaion Remedial Action Threat/Problem Haste Volume
VI South Valley, NM No significant Not
contamination was applicable
Industrial identified for this
Facilities Area source control
remedial action
03/30/89
5th - Final
VI United Soil contaminated 94,000 yd3
Creosoting, TX with organics (soil)
including PAHs, PCPs,
100-Acre Former and dioxins
Wood Preserving
Facility
09/29/89
2nd - Final
VII Arkansas City None Not
Dump, KS applicable
Former Oi 1
Ref i nery
09/19/89
2nd - Final
Components of
Selected Remedy
No further action
Excavating and treating soil using critical
fluid extraction and recycling or dis-
charging wastewater generated during treat-
ment process; incinerating and disposing of
liquid organic concentrate residues offsite;
spreading treated soil on commercial portion
of the site; backfilling residential areas
with clean fill; and air monitoring
No action remedy. EPA has determined that
it lacks authority or jurisdiction to under-
take cleanup of onsite petroleum wastes that
are not being released in significant
concentrations
Cleanup Goals
Not applicable
Contaminated soil will be
excavated and treated if
soil exceeds target action
levels. Specific target
action levels for carcino-
gens in the soil include
PAHs 330 ug/kg for the
residential area, and PAHs
40,000 ug/kg for the com-
mercial area of the site.
Target action levels for
dioxins and furans are based
on 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1 ug/kg for
the residential area and
2,3,7,8-TCDD 20 ug/kg for
the commercial area.
Specific target action
levels for noncarcinogens
include PAHs 2,000 mg/kg and
PCP 150 mg/kg
Not applicable
Present
Worth/
Capital and
OSM Costs
$0
(present
unrth^
WUI HI/
$22,000,000
(present
worth)
$19,750,000
(present
worth O&M
years 1-30)
$0
(present
worth)
£n
$0
(08M)
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
09
to
Reai on
VII
VII
VII
VII
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Chemplex, IA
Manuf acturi ng
Faci 1 i ty
09/27/89
1st
Cherokee County,
KS
Mining District
09/18/89
2nd
Doepke Disposal
(Holliday), KS
Industrial Waste
Landfill
09/21/89
1st - Final
Findett, MO
Chemical Plant
12/28/88
1st
Threat/Problem
GW contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene, toluene,
xylene, TCE, and PCE;
and other organics
including
carcinogenic and
noncarcinogenic PAHs
GW and SW
contaminated with
metals including
cadmium, chromium,
lead, and zinc
Soil and GW
contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene, xylene, and
toluene; other
organics including
pesticides, PAHs, and
PCBs; and metals
including chromium
and lead
Soil and GW
contaminated with
VOCs and other
organics including
PCBs
Components of
Waste Volume Selected Remedy
Not specified GW pumping and pretreatment followed by
treatment of pretreated GW at the exi sti ng
onsite biological activated sludge waste-
water treatment plant with discharge to SW;
implementation of GW use and deed
restrictions
Not specified Removal, consolidation, and onsite placement
of surface mine wastes in mine pits, shafts,
and subsidences; diversion and
channelization of surface streams with
recontouring and vegetation of land surface;
investigation of deep aquifer well quality
followed by plugging all abandoned and
inactive wells and rehabilitating active
wells, if necessary; and implementation of
institutional controls including deed
restrictions
96,000 gals Removal and off site treatment of contami-
(leachate) nated liquids currently ponded underground;
construction of a multi -layered cap; collec-
tion and off site treatment of GW seepage at
POTW, as necessary; GW monitoring; and im-
plementation of deed and access restrictions
Not specified Soil excavation with either off site disposal
or treatment; and GW pumping and treatment
using air stripping with discharge to POTW
Cleanup Goals
GW cleanup goals were
derived from Health Advisory
Levels (HALs), Negligible
Risk Levels (NRLs), Water
Quality Criteria (WQC), and
MCLs. Specific goals
include benzene 1.0 ug/1
(NRL), toluene 2,000 ug/1
(HAL), PCE 10 ug/1 (HAL),
TCE 3.0 ug/1 (NRL), and
xylene 10,000 ug/1 (MCL)
The selected remedy provides
action levels for the
removal and placement of
mine wastes below ground.
Chemical -specif ic action
levels include lead,
1,000 mg/kg, zinc
10,000 mg/kg, and cadmium
25 mg/kg
No cleanup criteria were
established for soil because
soil will be capped. GW
cleanup standards were
established for four metals
and five organic pesticides.
Chemical -specific GW cleanup
goals were not specified
Not specified
Present
Worth/
Capital and
OSM Costs
$2,622,000
(present
worth)
$219,600
(annual OSM
years 1-30)
$8,295,215
(present
worth)
$14,963
(annual OSM)
$5,970,000
(present
worth)
$107,000
(annual OSM)
$1,100,000
(capital )
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
Real on
VII
VII
VII
VII
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Hastings Ground
Water
Contamination, NE
Multiple Source
GW Contamination
09/26/89
1st
Johns' Sludge
Pond, KS
Waste Oil
Disposal Area
09/22/89
1st - Final
Kern-Pest
Laboratories, MO
Pesticide
Manufacturing
Facility
09/29/89
1st
Solid State
Circuits, MO
Manuf acturi ng
Faci 1 i ty
09/27/89
1st - Final
Threat/Problem
Soil contaminated
with VOCs including
carbon tetrachloride
and chloroform
None
Soil and sediment
contaminated with
VOCs including
xylenes; other
organics including
organochlorine and
pesticides; and
metals including
arseni c
GW contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
Components of
Waste Volume Selected Reined v
400 Ibs Treating soil using in-situ soil vapor
(VOCs in extraction to remove VOCs from soil; treat-
soil) ing vapor emissions by a vapor phase granu-
lar activated carbon system; and replacement
of carbon filters followed by off site dis-
posal at an approved regeneration or
incineration facility
Not No further action will be taken at this site
applicable because previous interim remedial activities
were adequate. Post-closure maintenance and
monitoring will be provided in addition to
implementation of land use controls
4,050 yd^ Excavation of soil and sediment with offsite
(soil and disposal in a RCRA-approved landfill;
sediment) sampling to verify extent of excavation is
sufficient to meet cleanup goals; and back-
filling and revegetating excavated area with
clean soil
57,790,000 GW pumping and treatment using air stripping
gals (GW) with offsite discharge to a POTW; and GW and
air monitoring
Cleanup Goals
No cleanup levels were
established because this
interim source control
action is not designed to
restore aquifer to drinking
water standards. Cleanup
effectiveness will be based
on the volume of volatile
contaminants recovered from
soil
Not applicable
Soil and sediment will be
excavated to a level con-
sistent with a 10"° excess
cancer risk
GW exceeding TCE 5 ug/1 will
be remediated at a POTW. GW
with TCE levels above
200 ug/1 will be treated
onsite before discharge to
the POTW. Discharge from
the POTW must meet the
average monthly State NPDES
limits of TCE 2 ug/1. GW
cleanup goals will meet a
10~6 cancer risk and an HI
ratio <1
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$874,000
(capital)
$154,000
(annual O&M)
$0
(present
worth)
$0
(O&M)
$2,600,000
(present
worth)
$4,629,000
(present
worth)
$445,300
(annual O&M)
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
ID
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Recrion Remedial Action
VII Todtz, Lawrence
Farm, IA
2.7-Acre Landfill
11 704/88
1st - Final
VII Vogel Paint &
Wax, IA
2-Acre Disposal
Area
09/20/89
1st - Final
VIII Burlington
Northern (Somers
Plant), MT
Former Rai 1 road
Tie Treating
Facility
09/27/89
1—1. f-*rt_T
1st — rinai
Threat/Problem
GW contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene, toluene,
carbon disulfide, and
tetrahydrofuran; and
metals including
arsenic, lead, and
chromi urn
Soil and GW con-
taminated with VOCs
including benzene,
toluene, and xylenes;
and metals including
chromium and lead
Soil, sediment, and
GW contaminated with
organics including
PAHs and phenols, and
metals including zinc
Components of
Waste Volume Selected Remedy
Not specified Installation of soil cover over impoundment;
provision of an alternate water supply to
affected residence; GW monitoring; and
implementation of institutional controls and
land use restrictions
3,000 yd3 Excavation and onsite bioremediation of
(soil) contaminated soil or onsite thermal treat-
ment if metal content is high; stabilization
and onsite disposal of treated soil; off site
incineration, recycling of leachate and
off site treatment of excess leachate at
POTW; GW pumping and treatment using air
stripping with discharge of treated GW to
SW; and GW and air monitoring
11,700 yd3 Excavation of soil and sediment with onsite
(soil and biological treatment; restoration of wet-
sediment) lands; installation and operation of hot
water flushing system and a water treatment
system using ozone/UV or peroxide/UV in
lagoon and swamp pond areas to treat GW,
with in-situ biological treatment to treat
residual contaminants; reinjection or dis-
charge of GW to POTW; GW monitoring; and
implementation of GW use restrictions
Cleanup Goals
Not applicable unless
chemical -specific action
levels (based on MCLs) are
exceeded in GW monitoring
wells
Soil treatment will achieve
leaching standards and GW
will be treated to health-
based levels. GW cleanup
goals are based on SDWA
MCLs/MCLGs or on State
action levels. Specific GW
cleanup goals include
benzene 0.001 mg/1 (State),
toluene 2.0 mg/1 (MCLG),
xylenes 10.0 mg/1 (MGLG),
chromium 0.10 mg/1 (MCL),
and lead 0.005 mg/1 (MCLG)
Soil will be treated until
the decrease in total PAHs
has been <20% per year or
background levels have been
reached. Soil treatment
goal is a risk level of
TO"6. GW cleanup goals
include cPAHs 0.030 ug/1
(WQC), total PAHs 0.30 ug/1
(10~5 risk-based level),
phenol 2,500 ug/1 (WQC),
benzene 5 ug/1 (MCL), and
zinc 110 ug/1 (WQC)
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$1,030,000 -
$2,500,000
(present
worth)
$510,000
( prsssnt
worth O&M)
$1,851,000
(present
worth)
$54,600
(annual O&M)
$11,000,000
(present
worth)
$661,000
(O&M years
1-2)
$811,000
(O&M years
3-10)
$72,000
(O&M years
11-30)
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Region Remedial Action
Threat/Problem
Waste Volume
Components of
Selected Remedy
Cleanup Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
VIII
CD
to
VIII
Libby Ground
Water
Contamination
Well Field
12/30/88
2nd
Soil, sediment, and
GW contaminated with
HT VOCs including
benzene; other
organics including
dioxin, PAHs, and
PCPs; metals in-
cluding arsenic;
and oil
Monti cello Soil, construction
Vicinity materials, and debris
Properties, UT contaminated with
thorium 230,
Uranium Mi 11 site radium.^0, and
radon "' contained
09/29/89 in the vanadium and
uranium mill tailings
1st - Final
30,000 yd3 Remedial actions are based on three operable
(soil) units:
Soil/source area - excavation and consolida-
tion of unsaturated soil and debris in the
waste disposal pit, followed by onsite
treatment using a two-step enhanced bio-
degradation process and final disposition;
cleaning saturated soil beneath the waste
disposal pit using a closed-loop, water/oil
recovery and treatment system; removal of
oil and contaminated GW using extraction
wells; reinjection of water following treat-
ment in a fixed-bed bioreactor, filling and
capping of waste pit, butt dip, and tank
farm areas
Upper aquifer - in-situ GW bioremediation
Lower aquifer - implementation of pilot
tests using biorestoration, and oil recovery
and dispersion techniques. All three
operable units will be subject to institu-
tional controls including deed, land use,
and GW restrictions; and GW monitoring
100,000 yd^ Excavation and removal of residual radio-
(soil and active material from affected properties and
construction restoration/reconstruction using clean
materials) materials, or modification of existing
structures to isolate radiation sources;
filling and regrading excavated areas; and
disposal and temporary storage of contami-
nated material at the Monti cello Mi 11 site
Treatment of soil and debris
will attain total cPAbs
88 mg/kg based on 10~b
risk level (chemical-
specific goals were provided
for many PAHs based on BOAT
concentrations), PCP
37.0 mg/kg (BOAT), and
combined dioxins and
dibenzofurans 0.001 mg/kg.
Saturated zone and upper
aquifer GW treatment will
attain total cPAHs 400 ng/1
total noncarcinogenic PAHs
40 ng/1; PCP 1.05 mg/1,
benzene 5 ug/1 (MCL), and
arsenic 50 ug/1 (MCL).
Other organics/ inorganics
are not to exceed a 10~5
risk level
Cleanup goals are based on
the Uranium Mill Tailings
Radiation Control Act of
1978. Individual goals
include radium "° in land
averaged over 100 nr shall
not Exceed 2pCi/g (back-
ground level) by 5pCi/g
averaged over the first
15 cm of soil or 15 pCi/g
averaged over 15 cm thick
layers more than 15 cm below
the surface. Additionally,
habitable buildings <0.02 WL
for annual average radon
decay and gamma radiation
20 microentgens per hour
$5,777,000
(present
worth)
$670,200
(annual 08M
year 2)
$521,200
(annual O&M
years 3-5)
$232,200
(annual O&M
years 6-8)
$80,000
(annual O&M
years 9-30)
$5,915,000
(average cost)
Corresponds
to $65,000
per property
mul ti pi i ed
by 91
properties
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Region Remedial Action
Threat/Problem
Waste Volume
Components of
Selected Remedy
Cleanup Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
VIII
VIII
IX
IX
Sand Creek
Industrial, CO
Former Pesticide
Manufacturing
Operation
09/29/89
1st
Woodbury
Chemi cal, CO
Waste Disposal
Area
09/29/89
2nd - Final
Atlas Asbestos
Mine, CA
Asbestos
Handli ng and
Shipment Area
07/19/89
1st
Beckman
Instruments
(Porterville),
12-Acre
Manufacturing
Faci1i ty
09/26/89
1st - Final
Soil, onsite build-
ings, and tanks
contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
and PCE; and other
orgariics including
pesticides
Soil contaminated
with VOCs including
PCE and TCE; other
organics including
pesticides; and
metals including
arsenic
Soil and debris
contaminated with
metals including
nickel; and other
inorganics including
asbestos and mining
wastes
Soil and GW
contaminated VOCs
CA including TCE and
metals including lead
1,000 yd^ In-situ vacuum extraction to remove VOCs
(soil) from contaminated soil and onsite treatment
of off-gas by air stripping; excavation and
offsite incineration of soil contaminated
with >1,000 mg/kg HOCs, with offsite
residual disposal in a RCRA landfill;
backfilling; demolition and offsite disposal
of buildings; and GW monitoring
12,370 yd3 Excavation and offsite incineration of
(soil) highly contaminated soil followed by offsite
disposal; excavation and offsite disposal of
less contaminated soil at a RCRA-permitted
landfill; and backfilling and revegetation
of the excavated area
14,500 yd3 Excavating and consolidating asbestos- and
(soil) nickel-contaminated soil and debris;
constructing onsite underground waste
management unit (WMU) and disposing of
contaminated soil in WMU; capping WMU area;
regrading excavated area; decontaminating
debris; monitoring soil moisture content,
GW, air, and personnel; and implementing
institutional controls
740 yd3 Excavation and offsite disposal of
(soil) lead-contaminated soil; continued operation
th GW pumping and treatment system for the
upper aquifer; pumping and treatment of GW
from upper aquitard and lower aquifer using
air stripping; offsite discharge of all
treated GW into infiltration basins or
irrigation canals; and GW monitoring
Soil target levels were $5,349,600
calculated using a soil- (present
water leaching model that worth)
assumed GW concentration
corresponding to SDWA MCLs O&M not
or a 10~" cancer risk specified
1 eve!. Chemi cal-speci fi c
cleanup levels were provided
for PCE 1,095 ug/kg (MCLs)
and TCE 285 ug/kg (MCLs)
Soil cleanup will attain an $6,962,600
excess lifetime cancer risk (present
of 10~6. Specific cleanup worth)
goals are based on ARARs and
background levels and $31,400
include arsenic 5-10 mg/kg, (O&M)
TCE 0.52 mg/kg, and PCE
1.9 mg/kg
All contaminated soil and $1,500,000 -
mining wastes will be $2,500,000
cleaned up to at or below (present
one area percent asbestos worth)
using polarized light
microscopy and at or below $35,000
background levels for nickel (annual O&M)
Soil contaminated with lead $4,740,000
above 200 mg/kg will be (present
excavated and disposed of worth)
offsite. GW cleanup goals
will attain State or Federal $0&M not
MCLs or State action specified
levels. Chemi cal-specific
GW cleanup goals include TCE
5 ug/1
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Sunnary Table
Region
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Threat/Problem
Waste
Volume
Components of
Selected Remedv
Cleanup
Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
08M Costs
IX
IX
Coalinga
Asbestos Mine,
Asbestos
Handling and
Shipment Area
07/19/89
1st
Coast Wood
Preserving, CA
Soil and debris
CA contaminated with
metals including
ni ckel; and other
inorganics including
asbestos and mining
wastes
14,500 yd^ Excavating and consolidating asbestos- and
(soil) nickel-contaminated soil and debris;
constructing onsite underground waste
management unit (WMU) and disposing of
contaminated soil in WMU; capping WMU area;
regrading excavated area; decontaminating
debris; monitoring soil moisture content,
GW, air, and personnel; and implementing
institutional controls
All contaminated soil and
mining wastes will be
cleaned up to at or below
one area percent asbestos
using polarized light
microscopy
$1,500,000 -
$2,500,000
(present
worth)
$35,000
(annual O&M)
IX
Fairchild
Semiconductor
(Mt. View), CA
Industrial
Facilities Area
06/09/89 -
06/30/89
1st and 2nd -
Final
Soil and GW con-
taminated with VOCs
including TCE, TCA,
PCE, toluene, and
xylenes; and other
organics including
phenols
Not specified In-situ vapor extraction of soil with
treatment by vapor phase GAC inside slurry
walls; limited excavation and aeration of
soil outside the slurry walls with onsite
disposal of residues; GW pumping and
treatment using air stripping, followed by
reinjection or discharge to SW; sealing any
conduits or potential conduits to protect
deep aquifer; and GW monitoring
Soil cleanup goals are based
on ensuring GW remedy
attains MCLs. Individual
goals include TCE 1 mg/kg
inside the slurry walls and
TCE 0.05 mg/kg outside the
slurry walls. GW goals for
shallow aquifers are based
on MCLs and a 10"4 to
10~5 excess cancer risk
and include TCE 5 ug/1
(MCL); goals for deep
aquifers include TCE
0.8 ug/1 (based on a 10"°
cumulative cancer risk)
$49,000,000 -
$56,000,000
(present
worth, which
includes O&M
cost)
IX Fairchild Soil and GW con-
Semiconductor taminated with VOCs
(S. San Oose), CA including PCE, TCA,
DCE, and xylenes
Manufacturing
Faci1i ty
03/20/89
1st - Final
Not specified Onsite soil vapor extraction; on- and off-
site pumping and treatment of shallow GW
using air stripping followed by discharge
to SW; deep GW pumping followed by dis-
charge of untreated GW to SW via storm
drains; conducting biodegradation studies
of onsite chemicals; implementing
institutional controls including deed
restriction and land and GW use restric-
tions; and GW monitoring
The soil cleanup goal is $9,393,100
1 mg/kg for VOCs. Indi- (present
vidual cleanup goals for worth)
onsite GW include DCE
6 ug/1; TCA 200 ug/1, and $7,231,700
xylenes 620 ug/1 (based on (total O&M)
DHS drinking water action
levels), and PCE 2 ug/1
(proposed State MCL).
Offsite GW will attain an
HI of 0.25
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
Regi on
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Threat/Problem
Waste
Vol ume
Components of
Selected Remedy
Cleanup
Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
IX Firestone Tire
(Salinas Plant),
CA
256-Acre Tire
Manufacturing
Plant
09/13/89
Ist-Final
IX IBM (San Jose
Plant), CA
Industrial
Facility
12/15/88
1st - Final
GW contaminated with
VOCs including TCE,
PCE, benzene,
toluene, xylenes,
1,1-DCA, 1,1-DCE, and
1,1,1-TCA
Not specified
Soil and GW con-
taminated with VOCs
including TCA,
toluene, and xylenes;
and other organics
Not specified
GW pumping and treatment at the existing
treatment facility using carbon adsorption
and air stripping, with off site discharge of
treated GW to SW; GW monitoring to ensure
that the GW plume is declining; crop testing
to ensure that there is no plant uptake of
the contaminants; and developing a
contingency plan for water in the deep
aquifer in case of contamination
Onsite soil vapor extraction; GW pumping and
treatment using air stripping with onsite
discharge to the aquifer and offsite
discharge to SW, if necessary
GW cleanup goals will be $1,742,000
based on chemical-specific (present
ARARs, a cumulative HI=1 for worth)
noncarcinogens, or a
carcinogenic risk of 10~° $1,517,000
depending on which is more (O&M for
stringent. Chemical-specific years 1-3.5)
goals include benzene 0,7 ug/1
(State), TCE 3.2 ug/1
(10-6 Hsk level), PCE
0.7 ug/1 (10~5 risk level),
toluene 20 ug/1 (HI=1),
xylenes 70 ug/1 (HI=1),
1,1-DCA 5.0 ug/1 (State), and
1,1-DCE 6.0 ug/1 (HI=1)
Soil remediation will attain Not specified
a 1 mg/kg level for all
contaminants of concern. GW
remediation goals are based
on State action levels, EPA
reference closes and lifetime
health advisories and in-
clude TCA 200 ug/1 (State),
toluene 100 ug/1 (State),
and xylenes 200 ug/1 (State)
in the upper zone, and an HI
of 0.25 with TCA 50 ug/1 in
the deeper aquifer zones
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Region Remedial Action
Th reat/Problem
Waste Volume
Components of
Selected Remedy
Cleanup Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
OSM Costs
IX Intel (Mountain
View Plant), CA
Industrial
Facilities Area
06/09/89
1st - Final
to
CO
Soil and GW con-
taminated with VOCs
including TCE, TCA,
PCE, toluene, and
xylenes; and other
organics including
phenols
Not specified In-situ vapor extraction of soil with
treatment by vapor phase GAC inside slurry
walls; limited soil excavation and aeration
outside the slurry walls with onsite dis-
posal of residues; GW pumping and treatment
using air stripping, followed by reinjection
or discharge to SW; sealing any conduits or
potential conduits to protect deep aquifer;
and GW monitoring
Soil cleanup goals are based
on ensuring GW remedy
attains MCLs. Individual
goals include TCE 1 ing/kg
inside the slurry walls and
TCE 0.05 mg/kg outside the
slurry walls. GW goals for
shallow aquifers are based
on MCLs and a 10~4 to
10~5 excess cancer risk
and include TCE 5 ug/1
(MCL); goals for deep
aquifers include TCE
0.8 ug/1 (based on a 10~b
cumulative cancer risk)
$49,000,000
$56,000,000
(present
worth)
IX
Koppers
(Oroville
Plant), CA
Wood Treating
Faci1i ty
09/13/89
1st - Final
Soil and GW con-
taminated with VOCs
including toluene,
xylenes, and benzene;
other organics
including PAHs, PCP,
and dioxins/furans;
and metals including
arsenic and chromium
334,000 yd^ Remediation of four discrete soil areas
(soil) includes in-situ biodegradation; excavation,
soil washing, with onsite disposal of
22.000,000 treated soil and treatment of residual
yd3 (GW) contamination in the washing fluid of onsite
treatment facility; installation of a low
permeability cap accompanied by downgradient
extraction wells; and excavation and
chemical fixation of metal-contaminated soil
followed by onsite disposal. GW remediation
includes pumping and treatment using
activated carbon with reinjection to GW; and
formalization and expansion of existing
alternate water supply
Soil cleanup goals include
PCP 17 mg/kg, dioxins/furans
0.03 ug/kg, background for
arsenic and chromium, and
cPAHs 0.19 mg/kg. These
levels will achieve 10~"
excess cancer risk targets.
GW objectives are the more
stringent of 10~° excess
cancer risk or State action
levels and include PCP
2.2 ug/1, cPAHs 0.007 ug/1,
dioxins 0.00000053 ug/1 or
the lowest detection limit,
and background for arsenic
and chromium
$77,700,000
(present
worth)
$37,100,000
(present
worth O&M)
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
Reai on
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Threat/Problem
Waste
Volume
Components of
Selected Remedy
Cleanup
Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
IX
IX
IX
Litchfield Air-
port Area, AZ
Industrial
Facilities
09/26/89
2nd - Final
Soil and GW
contaminated with
VOCs including TCE,
toluene, and xylenes;
and metals including
arsenic, chromium,
and lead
Nineteenth
Avenue Landfill,
AZ
213-Acre
Municipal and
Industrial
Landfi11
09/29/89
Ist-Final
Purity Oil
Sales, CA
Used Oil
Recycling
Facility
09/26/89
1st
Soil and refuse
contaminated with
VOCs including
toluene and xylenes
Sludge and GW con-
taminated with VOCs
including benzene,
TCE, toluene, and
xylenes; and metals
including lead.
Sludge also contami-
nated with other
organics including
PCBs, PAHs pesti-
cides, and phenols
284,100 yd2 The selected remedial action for the
(soil) northern portion of the site includes
treatment of soil using SVE to remove 99% of
contami nants; and GW pumpi ng and treatment
using air stripping, liquid phase GAC and
GAC polishing on air emissions, followed by
reinjection or discharge of municipal water
system. Remedial activities for the
southern porition of the site include
treatment of VOC-contaminated soil using
SVE; and GW pumping and treatment using air
stripping and wellhead treatment followed by
discharge to municipal water system
Not specified Containing landfill wastes onsite by
constructing an impermeable cap and surface
drainage structure over the landfill and
soil-cement levees along the river at the
landfill boundary; widening the river
channel; collecting and flaring landfill
generated gases; implementing institutional
controls and access restrictions; air and GW
monitoring; and implementing a contingency
GW treatment plan whenever GW standards are
exceeded at the landfill boundary
22,500 gals GW pumping and onsite treatment by greensand
(sludge) to remove metals and air stripping to remove
VOCs; disposal of treated GW by either
reinjection, disposal in a canal, or
disposal in local infiltration basins;
provision of alternate water supply;
creation of GW management zone; GW
monitoring; removal, onsite solidification
(if necessary), and offsite disposal of
contaminant sludge; and cleaning,
dismantling, and offsite disposal of tanks
containing sludge
VOC and metal-contaminated $30,227,000
soil will be removed until $31,693,000
levels remaining will not (present
cause or contribute to GW worth)
contamination in
concentrations exceeding GW O&M (to be
cleanup standards. GW determined)
cleanup goals are based on
SDWA MCLs, SALs, and AWQC.
Chemical specific GW cleanup
goals include toluene
340 ug/1 (SAL), TCE 5 ug/1
(MCL), xylenes 44 ug/1
(SAL), arsenic 50 ug/1
(MCL), chromium 50 ug/1
(MCL), and lead 50 ug/1 (MCL)
Not applicable to landfill $42,990,000
wastes. GW currently does (present
not pose a threat to human worth)
health or the environment.
If GW monitoring detects $1,010,000
concentrations exceeding (annual O&M
SDWA MCLs at the landfill for years
boundary, a contingency plan 1-30)
will be implemented
GW treatment will meet $11,660,000
Federal and State MCLs and (present
State action levels (SALs), worth)
chemical-specific cleanup
goals include TCE 5 ug/1 $6,960,000
(MCL) and benzene 1 ug/1 (present
(SAL) worth O&M)
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
Region
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Threat/Problem
Waste Volume
Components of
Selected Renedv
Cleanup Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
IX
co
oo
IX
IX
Raytheon, CA
Industrial
Facilities Area
06/09/89
1st - Final
Soil and GW con-
taminated with VOCs
including TCE, TCA,
PCE, toluene, and
xylenes; and other
organics including
phenols
Not specified
Sacramento Army GW contaminated with
Depot, CA VOCs including PCE
and TCE
Waste Disposal
Area
09/29/89
1st
San Fernando GW contaminated with
Valley (Area 1), VOCs including PCE
CA and TCE
Municipal Well
Field
06/30/89
Not specified
In-situ vapor extraction of soil with
treatment by vapor phase GAC inside slurry
walls; limited excavation and aeration of
soil outside the slurry walls with onsite
disposal of residuals; GW pumping and
treatment using air stripping, followed by
reinjection or discharge to SW; sealing any
conduits or potential conduits to protect
deep aquifer; and GW monitoring
GW pumping and treatment using ultraviolet
light/chemical oxidation followed by dis-
charge to the regional treatment plant and
industrial reuse of treated GW
Soil cleanup goals are based $49,000,000
on ensuring GW remedy $56,000,000
attains MCLs. Individual (present
goals include TCE 1 mg/kg worth)
inside the slurry walls and
TCE 0.05 mg/kg outside the
slurry walls. GW goals for
shallow aquifers are based
on MCLs and a 10~4 to
10~5 excess cancer risk
and include TCE 5 ug/1
(MCL); goals for deep
aquifers include TCE
0.8 ug/1 (based on a lO"6
cumulative cancer risk)
GW will be restored to meet $1,764,000
current drinking water (capital)
standards for TCE 5 ug/1
(MCL) and PCE 4 ug/1 (State $264,000
action level) (annual O&M)
Not specified Pumping and treatment of GW exceeding TCE Treated GW will meet Federal $69,000,000
100 ug/1 or PCE 5 ug/1 using air stripping
with vapor phase GAC adsorption units or
stream stripping, followed by discharge to
the municipal water supply distribution
system; and GW monitoring
MCLs or State action
levels. Individual goals
include TCE 5.0 ug/1 (MCL)
and PCE 4.0 ug/1 (State)
(present
worth)
$43,900,000
(annual O&M
years 1-20)
2nd
-------
FY89 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type
Signature Date/
Region Remedial Action
Threat/Problem
Waste Volume
Components of
Selected Remedy
Cleanup Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
IX South Bay Soil, debris, and air 128,500 yd2
Asbestos Area, CA contaminated with (paved area)
asbestos
Asbestos Cement
Pipe Manufac-
turing Facility
09/29/89
2nd - Final
Commencement Bay
Near Shore/ Tide
Flats, WA
Commercial
Seaport
09/30/89
2nd
Northside
Landfill, WA
345-Acre
Industrial/
Municipal
Landfill
09/30/89
1st - Final
Northwest
Transformer, WA
1.6-Acre Former
Salvage Yard
09/15/89
1st - Final
Sediment contami-
nated with organics
including PCBs and
PAHs; and metals
including arsenic,
mercury, lead, and
zinc
GW contaminated with
VOCs including PCE,
TCA, and TCE; and
metals including iron
and lead
1,181,000
yd3
(sediment)
Not specified
Soil contaminated
with organics
including PCBs
1,200 yd3
(soil)
Paving asbestos-contaminated truck yard and
industrial yard; controlling dust emissions
through monthly wet sweeping of streets;
offsite disposal of asbestos-contaminated
waste debris; and implementation of deed
restrictions and institutional controls
Identification and control of sources con-
taminating marine environment at the site;
sediment remediation includes a combination
of natural recovery and four sediment con-
trol technologies such as in-situ capping,
confined aquatic disposal, confined near-
shore disposal, or removal and upland
disposal; sediment monitoring; and
implementation of site use restrictions
Landfill closure and capping; GW pumping and
treatment during closure with off site dis-
charge to SW; GW monitoring; provision of an
alternate water supply; implementation of
institutional controls; and controlling gas
emissions
Excavation, consolidation, and treatment of
soil with a PCB concentration >10 mg/kg
using in-situ vitrification; filling entire
site; abandonment of onsite well; GW
monitoring; and sampling of onsite wooden
structure to determine whether a second
OU is necessary
Areas which receive or have
potential to receive heavy
vehicular traffic will be
paved if asbestos levels
exceed one area percent by
polarized light microscopy
Cleanup goals for sediment
were established using the
apparent effects thresholds
(AET). Specific sediment
objectives include
PCBs 150 ug/kg, PAHs
17,000 ug/kg, arsenic
57 mg/kg, and lead 450 mg/kg
Chemical-specific goals for
GW are based on MCLs or
AWQC, whichever is more
stringent, and include TCA
200 ug/1 (MCL) and TCE 5
ug/1 (MCL)
Soil will be treated until
the PCB concentration in the
residue is <1 mg/kg
$7,561,000
(present
worth)
$134,900
(O&M years
1-30)
$32,300,000
(total cost;
includes
sediment
remediation
only)
$30,000,000
(present
worth)
$771,000
(present
worth)
(O&M)
-------
-------
SECTION IV
RECORDS OF DECISION SUMMARY TABLE
FY 1982-1988
The FY 1982-1988 Record of Decision Summary Table provides an overview
of site problems, selected remedies, cleanup criteria and estimated costs
provided in the RODs signed between FY 1982-1988. The table is
presented by Region, in alphabetical order according to the site name.
201
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
••°
Reaion
I
I
I
I
I
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Auburn Road, NH
09/17/86
1st
Baird and
McGuire, MA
09/30/86
1st
Beacon Heights,
CT
09/23/85
Ist-Final
Cannon
Engineering/
Plymouth, MA
09/30/85
1st
Cannon
Engineering
Corporation, MA
Industrial
Facility
03/31/88
Ist-Final
Threat/Problem Waste Volume
GW contaminated with Not
VOCs including TCE, specified
organics, and
inorganics
GW, soil, and 191,000 yd3
sediments
contaminated with
VOCs, organics,
pesticides, dioxin,
PAHs, and metals
GW, SW, and soil Not
contaminated with specified
VOCs and organics
GW, SW, soil, and Not
sediments specified
contaminated with
PAHs, pesticides, and
metals including lead
Soil, GW, and debris Not
contaminated with specified
VOCs including
benzene, PCE and TCE,
and organics
including PAHs and
PCBs
Components of
Selected Rewedv
Extension of existing municipal water supply
Excavation and onsite thermal destruction of
contaminated soils; GW pump and treatment
with onsite discharge to the aquifer;
restoration of wetlands; and relocation of
river
Excavation of contaminated soils with onsite
consolidation; RCRA capping of consolidated
wastes, gas venting and stormwater
management; leachate collection with off site
disposal at a licensed waste water treatment
facility or onsite treatment with discharge
to Hockanum Brook; extension of public water
supply to the next municipal supply;
fencing; and installation of a more
extensive GW monitoring system
Removal and off site disposal of tanks,
associated pipework, and foundation to a
RCRA approved facility
Excavation and onsite treatment of soil
contaminated with VOCs using thermal
aeration, and excavation and off site
treatment of soil contaminated with PCBs;
implementation of a wetland restoration
program; decontamination and removal of
buildings, tanks, and structures; additional
soil sampling; access restrictions; GW
monitoring with implementation of a water
quality monitoring program; and
institutional controls
Cleanup Goals
Not specified
Excavation will remove
approximately 95 percent of
contamination by mass.
Action levels for GW
remediation will be
developed during design
Excavation of soil to
background levels, which
will be developed during
design
Not specified
Soil cleanup levels were
based on leaching potential
into GW as determined using
the Organic Leaching Model
and include benzene
550 ug/kg and TCE 71 ug/kg.
The soil cleanup level for
PCBs 9 mg/kg is based on
risk levels. GW cleanup
levels are the MCLs for
benzene 5 ug/1, TCE 5 ug/1,
and vinyl chloride 2 ug/1
Present
Worth/
Capital and
08M Costs
$2,372,000
(present
worth)
$57,000
(annual O&M)
$44,386,000
(capital)
$4,132,000
(present
worth O&M)
$17,397,000
( capi tal )
$235,000
(annual O&M)
$350,000 or
$433,000
(capital)
$0 (O&M)
$3,411,000 -
4,505,000
(present
worth)
$700,000
(present
worth
O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
agion Remedial Action
Threat/Problem
Waste Volume
Components of
Selected Remedy
Cleanup Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
Charles George,
MA
GW contaminated with
VOCs
Not
specified
Extension of existing water supply system
Not specified
$2,453,000
(present
worth)
12/29/83
1st
Charles George,
MA
07/11/85
2nd
Charles George
Reelamati on
Landfill, MA
70-Acre Landfill
09/29/88
3rd and 4th Final
Air, GW, SW, and
sludge contaminated
with VOCs including
toluene, organics,
and metals
Not
specified
Sediments, GW, and 500
air contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene, TCE, and
PCE, organics
including PAHs, and
metals including
Davis Liquid
Waste, RI
09/29/87
1st
Soil and GW 25,000
contaminated with
VOCs, inorganics, and
organi cs
Capping; SW diversion and collection system;
venting off-gas collection system to the
atmosphere; and a full peripheral leachate
collection system
GW pump and treatment along with collected
leachate using biological treatment, metals
precipitation, and carbon adsorption,
followed by onsite discharge to GW; GW and
residential well monitoring; collection and
incineration of landfill vent gas emissions;
excavation and solidification of sediments
with onsite disposal in landfill
Excavation and onsite incineration of raw
wastes and contaminated soils with
backfilling of treated soils not EP toxic;
onsite disposal of EP toxic treated soils in
RCRA landfill; GW pump and treatment using
air stripping and carbon adsorption with
reinjection; and provision of an alternate
water supply for nearby residences
Not specified
GW cleanup will meet
individual target levels
based on MCLs including
benzene 5 ug/1, arsenic
50 ug/1, and TCE 5 ug/1.
Discharge concentration
levels were provided for
18 contaminants. Sediments
will meet the target cleanup
level for PAHs of 1.0 mg/kg
based on a risk level of
4x10~". Vent emissions
will be treated to a
cumulative risk level of
1x10"". Individual target
levels for vent emissions
were provided for
12 contaminants including
benzene 568 ug/m ,
TCE 3,210 ug/m3, and PCE
8,690 ug/nr
Soils will be treated to
attain 10~5 cancer risk
level with concentrations of
total VOCs reduced to
<2 mg/kg. GW will be
treated to attain the 10"=
cancer risk level which
includes reducing
concentrations of benzene
and TCE to 5.0 ug/1 (MCLs)
each
$13,613,725
(capital)
$1,252,901
(annual O&M)
$11,320,000
(present
worth)
$773,000
(annual O&M)
$27,392,000
(present
worth)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Suamary Table
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Region Remedial Action
Threat/Problem
Waste Volume
Components of
Selected Reinedv
Cleanup Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&H Costs
Grovel and Wells,
MA
Industrial
Facility
09/30/88
1st
Soil, sediments, GW,
and SW contaminated
with VOCs including
PCE and TCE, and
metals including
arsenic and lead
20,000 yd3
(soil)
Hocomonco Pond,
MA
09/30/85
Ist-Final
GW, SW, soil, and
sediments
contaminated with
orgam'cs, inorganics,
and metals
Not
specified
In situ vacuum extraction followed by carbon
adsorption treatment of contaminated soil;
GW pump and treatment using air stripping
and carbon adsorption with reinjection to
the aquifer; GW monitoring; and sealing or
disconnecting all drains and lines to the
subsurface disposal system
Former Lagoon: capping with site grading;
and relocation of storm drain pipe
Kettle Pond Area: pond dewatering and
lowering area ground water levels; soil and
waste excavation; dewatering sediments with
onsite landfilling; air quality monitoring;
if necessary, treatment with discharge of
effluent water; construction of onsite
landfill; and restoration of wetland areas
Hocomonco Pond and Discharge Stream:
mechanical dredging and onsite disposal of
sediments; and treatment of pond water in
system constructed for Kettle Pond area
Otis Street: seal storm drain
Isolated Areas: removal of contaminated
materials and onsite disposal
GW cleanup levels for VOCs
are-based on MCLs or a
10~° cancer risk level,
and cleanup levels for
metals are based on State
Ground Water Quality
Standards and permit
requi reinents. Ind i vi dual
goals include PCE 5.0 ug/1,
TCE 5.0 ug/1 (MCL), arsenic
50 ug/1, and lead 50 ug/1.
Soil cleanup goals for VOCs
were based on achieving the
target GW levels and include
PCE 18.2 ug/kg and TCE 6.3
ug/kg
Not specified
$4,165,000
(present
worth)
$2,677,000
(present
worth O&M)
$2,213,000
(capital)
$56,000
(annual O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Reai on Remedi al Acti on
I Industri-plex, MA
09/30/86
1st
0
01 I Iron Horse Park,
MA
Industrial
Facility
09/15/88
1st
I Keefe
Envi ronmental , NH
11/15/83
1st
Threat/Problem Waste Volume
GW, soil, sludge, and 1,000 yd3
air contaminated with
metals, and VOCs
including toluene and
benzene
Soil, sludge, and 28,000 yd3
debris contaminated (soil and
with VOCs, organics sludge)
including PAHs, and
metals including
arsenic and lead
SW and soil Not
contaminated with specified
VOCs including TCE
and PCE, organics,
and metals
Components of
Selected Remedy
Capping with soil grading; GW pump and
treatment using air stripping with discharge
to the aquifer; development of a
multi -service GW response plan;
institutional controls; stabilization of
side slopes; and treatment of gaseous
emissions
Excavation and biodegradation of
contaminated soil and sludge with residual
disposal to the lagoon area, followed by
constructing a clean soil cover and
revegetation; and decontamination of the
lagoon system's piping and pumps
Removal and off site disposal of lagoon
contents, liner, and highly contaminated soil
Cleanup Goals
Eliminate direct contact
threat of soils with arsenic
>300 mg/kg, lead >600 mg/kg
and chromium >1000 mg/kg. GW
treatment will meet MCLs.
Air remedy will achieve
NAAQS and unit cancer risks
Treatment of soil .and sludge
will attain a 10~" excess
cancer risk for industrial
use of the area, and 10~5
excess cancer risk for
residential use of the
area. Treatment should
reduce contaminant
concentration in wastes
70-80%, and will meet the
state pathogen reduction
requirements for sludge.
Individual cleanup goals
were not specified
Not specified
Present
Worth/
Capital and
0&M Costs
$12,302,300
or
$12,612,000
(depending
on ai r
treatment)
(present
worth)
$285,500 or
$311,000
(depending
on air
treatment)
(annual O&M)
$2,273,000
(capital)
$47,000
(present
worth O&M)
$500,000
(capital)
$0 (O&M)
-------
I
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Soranary Table
Real on
I
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action Threat/Probl en
Keefe Soil and GH
Environmental contaminated vrith
Services, NH VOCs including PCE
and TCE
Waste Disposal
Facility
03/21/88
2nd-Final
Components of
Waste Volume Selected Remedy
150,000 ft^ In situ treatment of soil using vacuun
(soil area) extraction with discharge to the atmosphere;
and GW pump and treatment using air
stripping, filtration, and carbon adsorption
with discharge to a GW recharge area along
site border (adjacent to wetland)
CleanuD Goals
Cumulative soil cleanup
goals will attain a 5.7 x
10~5 cancer risk level.
Individual goals include
benzene 20.8 ug/kg, PCE
91 ug/kg, TCE 31.5 ug/kg,
1,2-dichloroethane
3.5 ug/kg, and
1 , 1-di chloroethylene
22.8 ug/kg. GW will meet
MCL values which include
benzene 5 ug/1 , PCE 5 ug/1 ,
TCE 5 ug/1 ,
1,2-dichloroethane 5 ug/1,
and 1, 1-di chloroethylene 7
ug/1
Present
Worth/
Capital and
OSM Costs
$1,937,300
(capital)
$4,157,700
(present
worth O&M)
0)
Kellogg-Deering
Well Field, CT
09/25/86
1st
Landfill and
Resource
Recovery, RI
28-Acre
Industrial/Munici-
pal Landfill
09/29/88
Ist-Final
Laurel Park, CT
19-Acre
Industrial
Landfill
06/30/88
Ist-Final
GW contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
and PCE
Air contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene, toluene,
PCE, and TCE
Soil, sediments,
GW.and SW
contaminated with
VOCs, organics, and
metal s
Not Initiation of existing air stripping
specified facilities with discharge to existing
treatment plant and distribution system
Not Upgrading the landfill by slope
specified stabilization, installation of a RCRA cap,
and revegetation; collection and thermal
destruction (method to be determined in
design) of landfill gases; excavation of
eroded landfill sand from wetlands, with
replacement onsite, and vegetation of
excavated wetland areas; access
restrictions; and GW and air monitoring
1,300,000 Installation of a RCRA cap over all waste
yd3 disposal areas; rehabilitation of existing
leachate collection system supplemented by a
shallow GW extraction system consisting of a
french drain and/or GW extraction wells with
discharge and offsite treatment at NWPCF;
and monitoring of all media
GW treatment will achieve a
99 percent TCE removal
efficiency, which ,
corresponds to the 10~"
excess cancer risk
Target cleanup levels for
the gaseous emissions are
the State Air Toxic
Regulations. Individual
goals were not specified
GW and leachate will be
extracted to meet the RCRA
Ground Water Protection
Standard (GWPS) at the point
of compliance, which is the
vertical surface at the
hydraulically downgradient
limit of the waste
management area. Currently,
the GWPS are set at MCLs,
ACLs, or background.
Individual cleanup levels
were not specified
$69,751
(capi tal)
$0 (O&M)
$5,674,000
$6,790,000
(present
worth)
$21,706,300
(present
worth) or
$23,078,200
(including
pretreatment,
if necessary)
(present
worth)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Region Remedial Action
Threat/Problem
Waste Volume
Components of
Selected Remedy
Clear
Goal;
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
McKin Site, ME
07/15/83
IRM
McKin Site, ME
07/22/85
2nd-Final
Nyanza Chemi cal,
MA
09/04/85
1st
GW, SW, soil, and air
contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
and PCE
GW, SW, and soil
contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
and PCE
GW, SW, soil, and
sediments
contaminated with
organics, inorganics,
and metals
Old Springfield GW contaminated with
Landfill, VT VOCs including
benzene, TCE, DCE,
27-Acre and vinyl chloride,
Industrial/Muni ci- and other organics
pal Landfill including PCBs and
PAHs
09/22/88
1st
Ottati & Goss, NH
01/16/87
1st-Fi nal
Soil, sediments, and
GW contaminated with
VOCs including TCE,
organics including
PCBs, and organics
Not
specified
Not
specified
Not
specified
19,000 yd3
Onsite cleaning and salvage of tanks; and
offsite disposal of liquids and sludges
Onsite soil aeration; off site disposal of
drums; soil testing of petroleum
contaminated areas; GW pump and treatment;
SW discharge system; revaluation of GW
performance standards; offsite GW and SW
monitoring program; and site removal and
closure activities
Excavation and consolidation of sludge
deposits and sediments with backfilling to
original grade and revegetation of wetlands;
RCRA capping over entire Hill area;
construction of upgradient surface and GW
diversion system; and downgradient GW
monitoring
GW extraction and leachate collection with
combined treatment onsite or discharge to a
POTW; institutional controls; multimedia
monitoring; and additional site studies
Onsite incineration of 5,000 yd3 soil and
sediments with > 20 mg/kg PCBs; aeration of
14,000 yd6 of soils <20 mg/kg PCBs and >1
mg/kg total VOCs; GW pump and treatment
using air stripping, biological treatment,
and ion-exchange with reinjection; and
onsite backfilling of all residuals with
grading and covering
Not specified
GW treatment will meet
^Q~^ cancer risk level
criteria including 1,1,1-TCA
92 ug/1 and TCE 28 ug/1.
Soil will be treated to
TCE 0.1 mg/kg
All outlying sludge deposits
and contaminated soils and
sediments associated with
these deposits will be
excavated to background
levels for chromium, lead,
and mercury
GW and leachate cleanup
goals will attain MCLs and
include benzene 5 ug/1, TCE
5 ug/1, DCE 7 ug/1, and
vinyl chloride 2 ug/1
Soil, sediments, and GW will
attain the health-based
cleanup level of 10~5.
Specific GW goals include
1,2-DCE 3.8 ug/1, TCE 26.0
ug/1, PCE 6.7 ug/1, and
benzene 13.0 ug/1. Specific
soil and sediment goals
include PCBs 20.0 mg/kg and
total VOCs 1.0 mg/kg
$47,000
(capital)
$0 (O&M)
$3,919,000
(capital)
$38,900
(annual O&M)
$5,600,000 -
$9,800,000
(capital)
$92,000 (O&M)
(year 1)
$70,000
(annual O&M)
(years 2-30)
$5,374,000
(present
worth)
$173,000
(annual O&M)
$8,592,500
(capital)
$1,735,000
(annual O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
co
Reai on
I
I
I
I
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Picillo Farm, RI
09/30/85
1st
Re-Solve, MA
07/01/83
1st
Re-Solve, MA
09/24/87
2nd-Fina1
Rose Disposal
Pit, MA
Waste Disposal
Area
09/23/88
Ist-Final
Threat/Problem Waste Volume
GH and soil 3,500 yd3
contaminated with
PCBs, and VOCs
including TCE
GW, SW, and soil Not
contaminated with specified
PCBs, VOCs, and metals
Soil, sediments, and 25,500 yd3
GW contaminated with
VOCs, and organics
including PCBs
Soil, sediments, GW 60,000 yd3
and SW contaminated (soil)
with VOCs including
benzene, PCE, TCE,
toluene and xylenes,
and PCBs
Components of
Selected Renedv
Onsite disposal of primarily PCB and phenol
contaminated soils in a RCRA/TSCA landfill;
and site closure activities
Excavation and off site disposal of lagoon
contents and highly contaminated soil; and
clay capping of entire site
Excavation with KPEG dechlori nation and
onsite placement of 22,500 yAs of soil and
3000 yd3 of sediments; GW pump and
treatment using air stripping and carbon
adsorption with reinjection; and
institutional controls restricting GW usage
Excavation and onsite incineration of 15,000
yd3 of soil and sediment with residual
disposal onsite; GW pump and treatment along
with SW using air stripping and carbon
adsorption with discharge to the aquifer;
and institutional controls
Cleanuo Goals
Not specified
Not specified
Soils will be treated to
PCBs 25.0 tag/kg based on the
10~5 cancer risk level.
Sediments will be treated to
PCBs 1.0 mg/kg. GW will be
treated to the 10~5 cancer
risk which includes MCL
values for TCE, PCE, and
methyl ene chloride of 5.0
ug/1 each
Soil with PCBs in excess of
13 mg/kg (based on a 10~b
risk level) will be
incinerated to a
concentration less than 2
mg/kg for PCBs. GW cleanup
goals are set at or below
MCLs, if available, MCLGs,
Lifetime Health Advisory
(LHA) or a lO"6 cancer
risk level. Individual GW
goals include TCE (MCL),
benzene (MCL), and PCE 1
ug/1 (10~° risk level)
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$841,000
(capital)
$12,120 (OSM)
(year 1)
$25,648
(annual O&M)
(years 2-4)
$19,048
(annual O&M)
(years 5-30)
$3,050,000
(capital)
$36,000
(annual O&M)
$7,332,900
( capi tal )
$1,097,000
(present
worth O&M)
$6,450,000
(present
worth)
$5,790,000
(present
worth O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
CO
Region
I
I
I
I
I
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Sylvester, NH
07/29/82
IRM
Sylvester, NH
09/22/83
1st
Tinkham Garage,
NH
09/30/86
Ist-Final
Western Sand &
Gravel, RI
09/28/84
1st
Winthrop
Landfill, ME
11/22/85
Ist-Final
Threat/Problem Waste Volume
GW, SW, and air Not
contaminated with specified
VOCs, inorganics, and
heavy metals
GW, SW, and air Not
contaminated with specified
VOCs, inorganics, and
metal s
GW, SW, and soil 10,800 yd3
contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
and PCE, organics,
and metals
GW contaminated with Not
VOCs including TCE, specified
and organics
GW contaminated with Not
organics specified
Components of
Selected Remedy
Capping with installation of a slurry wall
r
GW pump and treatment system
Excavation and onsite treatment of soils via
aeration, soil washing, or composting
followed by onsite disposal; GW pump and
treatment at POTW; and restoration of
wetl ands
Installation of carbon canister filters as a
temporary measure; and installation of a
permanent alternate water supply
RCRA capping; alternate water supply; and
institutional controls
Cleanup Goals
Not specified
GW treatment will
attain ACLs
At a minimum, soil will be
treated to TVO 1 mg/kg. GW
will be treated to 5 ug/1
for PCE and TCE
Not specified
ACLs for each GW contaminant
will be established based on
RCRA criteria. If ACL not
established, protection will
be to background levels
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$8,822,000
(capital)
$750,000
(annual O&M)
$4,696,400
(capital)
$1,380,000
(annual O&M)
$2,058,000
(capital)
$874,000
(annual O&M)
$1,493,513
(present
worth)
$156,800
(annual O&M)
(year 1)
$100,800
(annual O&M)
(years 2-30)
$6,000,000
(capital)
$42,000
(annual O&M
if ACL not
exceeded)
$360,000 -
$1,480,000
(annual O&M
if ACL
exceeded)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Sunary Table
Reai on
I
II
II
II
Site Narc,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Yaworski Lagoon,
CT
Waste Disposal
Area
09/29/88
Ist-Final
Ameri can
Thermostat, NY
Industrial
Faci 1 i ty
01/07/88
1st
Asbestos Dump, NJ
Industrial
Facility
09/30/88
1st
Beachwood/
Berkeley Wells,
NJ
Residential
Plumbing System
06/30/88
Ist-Final
Threat/Probl en
Soil, sediments, GW
and debris
contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene, toluene, and
xylenes, organics
including PAHs, and
metals including
chromium and lead
GW contaminated with
VOCs including PCE
and TCE
Soil and GW
contaminated with
asbestos
Drinking water
contaminated with lead
Waste Volune
65,000 yd3
(sludge)
60,000 yd3
(debris)
Not
specified
90,000 yd3
(asbestos
waste)
Not
specified
Components of
Selected Reined v
Installation of a RCRA cap over lagoon area;
reconstruction of lagoon dike to improve
flood control; GH monitoring; and GW
treatment with method to be established as
part of corrective action program, if
necessary
Extension of the existing Catskill Water
District pipeline to affected and
potentially affected areas; the contaminated
GW and surrounding areas will be cleaned up
by the owner of the property
Installation of a soil cover; construction
of slope protection/ stabilization measures
along asbestos mound embankment, and surface
runoff diversion channels; GW monitoring;
institutional controls restricting GW usage
and land development; access restrictions;
and treatability studies to evaluate
technologies that may permanently remediate
asbestos
No man-made or industrial contaminant source
is causing the elevated lead levels in
drinking water. Remediation under the
Superfund program is precluded by law. The
State of New Jersey is proceeding
independently to address the problem
Cleanup Goals
GW cleanup levels will meet
ACLs established as part of
the selected remedy.
Individual ACLs were not
specified
GW cleanup goals will meet
MCLs for TCE 0.005 mg/1,
1,1-dichloroethylene 0.007
mg/1 , and
1,1-trichloroethane 0.200
mg/1 , and the Water Qua! i ty
Criteria chronic level for
PCE 0.800 ing/1
Remedy addresses containment
of asbestos, thus individual
cleanup goals are not
appl i cabl e
Not applicable
Present
Worth/
Capital and
OSM Costs
$1,673,000
(capital)
$716,000
(present
worth O&M)
$2,270,000 -
$2,380,000
( capi tal )
$100,000 -
$110,000
(annual O&M)
$1,145,000
(present
worth)
$56,000 -
$161,000
(annual OSM)
$0
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
to
Recrion
II
II
II
II
II
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Bog Creek Farm,
NJ
09/30/85
1st
Brewster Well
Field, NY
09/30/86
1st
Brewster Well
Field, NY
Municipal Well
Field
09/29/88
2nd-Fi nal
Bridgeport, NJ
12/31/84
Ist-Final
.Burnt Fly Bog, NJ
11/16/83
1st
Threat/Problem Waste Volume
GW, soil, and Not
sediments specified
contaminated with
VOCs, organics, and
metal s
GW contaminated with Not
VOCs including TCE specified
and PCE
Soils, sediments, 100 yd^
sludge, and debris
contaminated with
VOCs including PCE
and TCE
GW, SW, soil, and Not
sediments specified
contaminated with
VOCs and PCBs
GW, SW, and soil Not
contaminated with specified
PCBs, VOCs, and metals
Components of
Selected Remedy
Removal of waste water and sediments from
pond and bog with regrading and covering of
both areas and treatment of waste water with
discharge to stream; excavation of VOC
contaminated soil with onsite or off site
incineration; evaluation of soil washing,
segregation, and other technologies to
reduce the volume of soils to be
incinerated; compacted soil capping; fencing
around site and work areas; and evaluation
of monitoring program effectiveness
GW pump and treatment using existing air
stripping facilities with reinjection to the
aquifer
Excavation and off site incineration of
drywell sediments, sludge and soil with
greater than 4 mg/kg PCE, followed by
off site disposal; and removal,
decontamination and off site disposal of the
concrete drywell structure and debris
Disposal of oily waste, sediment, and sludge
via onsite incineration; removal and
disposal of contaminated water using onsite
treatment; drum excavation with off site
removal; maintenance pumping; removal and
off site disposal of tanks and waste; and
installation of an alternate water supply
pipeline
Excavation and off site disposal of liquids,
sludges, asphalt piles, drums, and
contaminated soil from lagoons and northern
wetlands; restoration of original site
contours and vegetation; and implementation
of a 5-year GW monitoring program
Cleanup Goals
Excavation of soil with
>1 0,000 mg/kg TVOs
Existing air stripping
system exceeds State and
Federal ARARs for GW which
include TCE 10 ug/1 (State)
and 5 ug/1 (Federal)
Remediation of all soil,
sediments, sludge and debris
containing greater than 4
mg/kg PCE will reduce health
risks due to direct contact
with contaminated site soils
to 1xlO~°
GW must meet TOC limit of 50
mg/1 on a 30 day average
Not specified
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$9,200,000
(capital)
$54,400
(annual O&M)
$163,912
(capital)
$27,468
(annual O&M)
$241,940
(capital)
$57,672,000
(capital)
$20,000
(annual O&M)
$2,200,000
( capi tal )
(Phase I)
$5,110,000
(capital)
(Phase II)
$60,000
(annual O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Surasary Table
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Region Remedial Action
II Burnt Fly Bog, NO
Industrial Waste
Disposal
Area/Muni ci pal
Landfill
09/29/88
2nd
II Cal dwell
Trucking, NO
09/25/86
KS
- 1st
10
II Chemical
Control, NO
09/19/83
1st
II Chemical
Control, NO
09/23/87
2nd
II Combe Fill
North, NJ
09/29/86
Ist-Final
Threat/Problem Waste Volume
Soil, sediments, and 82,000 yd3
SW contaminated with (soil and
PCBs and lead sediments)
GW and soil 28,000 yd3
contaminated with
PAHs, PCBs, VOCs
including TCE,
inorganics, and
metals including lead
GW and soil Not
contaminated with specified
VOCs, organics
including PCBs,
pesticides, and
inorganics
Soil contaminated 18,000 yd3
with VOCs, organics,
inorganics, and
pesticides
GW and soil Not
contaminated with specified
organics and low
levels of VOCs
Components of
Selected Remedy
Excavation and off site disposal of
approximately 5,600 yd3 of contaminated
downstream sediments; containment through a
sedimentation basin and diversion controls
of remaining contaminated soil and
sediments; access restrictions; and
performance of treatability studies to
determine final treatment for contained
contaminated soil and sediments
Excavation and heat addition treatment of
soil and waste materials with onsite
disposal; GW treatment using air stripping;
and provision of an alternate water supply
Removal of gas cylinders; reconstruction of
storm sewer catch basins and grates;
cleaning of the storm sewer system with
constructon of curbing; and decontamination
of box trailer and vacuum truck
In-situ fixation of 18,000 yd3 of soil;
repairing berm to prevent surface runoff
into adjacent river; removal of debris; and
sealing of a sanitary sewer
Capping with grading and compacting of
disposal areas; installation of drainage and
venting systems; and site fencing
Cleanuo Goals
Remedy is an interim action
designed to control
contaminant migration
pending treatability study
results. Cleanup goals for
the downstream sediments
will meet the State soil
cleanup criteria of PCBs
5 rag/kg and lead 250 mg/kg
Not specified
Not specified
Cleanup goals for
contaminants in the soil
were not specified
Not specified
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$3,000,000
(present
worth for
three-year
life) or
$6,100,000
(present
worth for
20-year life)
$320,000
(annual 08M)
$5,490,000
( capi tal )
$48,000
(annual O&M)
$732,500
(capital)
$0 (O&M)
$7,208,000
(capital)
$57,400
(annual O&M)
(year 1-5)
$22,400
(annual O&M)
(years 6-30)
$10,500,000
(capital)
$168,000
(annual O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
ro
Reaion
II
II
II
II
II
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Combe Fill
South, NJ
09/29/86
Ist-Final
Cooper Road, NJ
09/30/87
Ist-Final
Di amond
Alkali, NJ
09/30/87
1st
D'Imperio
Property, NJ
03/27/85
Ist-Final
Endicott Village
Well Field, NY
09/25/87
1 cf
1 Si-
Threat/Problem Waste Volume
GW and soil Not .
contaminated with specified
VOCs including TCE
and PCE
None Not
applicable
Soil, debris, GW, and Not
air contaminated with specified
pesticides including
TCDD and DDT
GW and soil 3,900 yd3
contaminated with VOCs
GW contaminated with 3,700 gpm
VOCs (to be
treated)
Components of
; Selected Remedy
RCRA capping; active gas collection and
treatment system; GW and leachate pump and
treatment with discharge to brook; alternate
water supply; SW controls; and fencing
No further action
Construction of site slurry wall and flood
wall; disassembly and decontamination of
structures and materials for off site reuse,
recycling, or disposal; off site
transportation of all drums containing
hazardous substances >1 ug/kg TCDD for
treatment or disposal; securing of all
material with >1 ug/kg TCDD onsite;
stabilization of remaining drums with
dioxi n-contami nated materials; GW pump and
treatment; plugging or rerouting underground
conduits; and onsite placement and capping
of sludge
Excavation and offsite disposal of
contaminated waste, soil, and surface drums;
RCRA capping; and GW pump and treatment
GW treatment with air stripping and
chlori nation; and continued operation of an
existing purge well to intercept
contamination on its way to the supply well
Cleanup Goals
Not specified
Not specified
Cleanup levels will attain
10-° cancer risk level.
GW will be treated to
include dioxin 1.4 x
10-5ug/l, DDT 2.4 x 10~2
ug/1 , and hexachlorobenzene
7.4 x lO"1 ug/1. Soil and
structures will be treated
to dioxin 1.0 ug/1
Cleanup will be monitored
and assessed in accordance
with Drinking Water
Standards to determine need
for additional remediation
GW treatment will attain MCL
values which include vinyl
chloride 2 ug/1 ,
1,2-dichloroethane 5 ug/1,
and trichloroethane 5 ug/1.
Tetrachloroethene 0.88 ug/1
and 1,1 ,2-trichloroethane
0.6 ug/1 will meet levels
established by the FWQC, and
will meet the 10~° cancer
risk level. Vinyl chloride
air emission will meet the
National Emission Standard
for Clean Air of 10 ppm
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$46,060,700
(capital)
$673,000
(annual O&M)
$0
$8,068,000
( capi tal )
$261,000
(annual O&M)
$4,251,551
(capital)
$1,169,449
(present
worth O&M)
$1,200,000
(capital)
$147,000
(annual O&M).
-------
FY8Z-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Reai on
ii
ii
ii
ii
ii
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Ewan Property, NJ
Illegal Waste
Disposal /Dumping
Area
09/29/88
1st
Florence
Landfill, NJ
06/27/86
Ist-Final
Fri edman
Property, NJ
04/30/85
Ist-Final
GE Moreau, NY
07/13/87
1st
GEMS Landfill, NJ
09/27/85
Ist-Final
Threat/Probl em
Soil contaminated
with VOCs including
benzene, TCE, PCE,
and xylenes, and
metals including
chromium and lead
GW and soil
contaminated with
VOCs and metals
No threat
Soil, SW, and GW
contaminated with
VOCs including TCE,
and organics
including PCBs
GW, SW, soil , and air
contaminated with
VOCs, inorganics, and
organics
Waste Volume
500-8,000
drums
4,500 yd3
(heavily
contami nated
soil and
drum
contents)
29,500 yd3
(moderately
contami nated
soil and
drum
contents)
Not
specified
None
8,600 yd3
Not
speci f i ed
Components of
Selected Remedv
Excavation and off site-incineration of
approximately 4,500 yd3 of contaminated
soil/waste; additional assessment of
non-incinerable waste to determine the
appropriate remediation; and GW and air
monitoring
Capping with slurry wall containment system;
removal and onsite disposal of lagoon
liquids and surface debris; leachate
collection, treatment, and off site disposal;
gas collection and treatment; and partial
fencing
No action with five-year onsite well
monitoring; and deed restrictions
Excavation of soil with disposal under cap;
slurry wall installation (completed); SW and
GW treatment with air stripping; and
extension of municipal water supply to
affected residents
Capping with regrading of existing landfill
slopes; gas collection and treatment system;
GW pump and treatment with discharge to POTW
or SW; remediationof Holly Run and
BriarLake; SW controls; fencing; and
extension
of existing water supply system
Cleanuo Goals
Final cleanup goals will be
determined during a
subsequent operable unit
Not specified
Not specified
Soil cleanup goals were not
specified. GW and SW
treatment will attain the
MCL for TCE 5.0 ug/1 and the
State guidance value for
1,2-DCE 50.0 ug/1
Discharge criteria will be
established by the State and
are dependent on the point
of discharge (to be
determined)
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$21,153,000
(present
worth)
$22,000
(annual O&M)
$8,021,000
(capital)
$170,000
(annual O&M)
(capital) $0
$12,000
(annual O&M)
$16,382,000
(capital)
$78,000
(annual O&M)
$27,365,000
(capital)
$601,000
(annual O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Region
II
II
II
II
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
GE Wi ri ng
Devices, PR
Industrial
Faci 1 i ty
09/30/88
1 st-Fi nal
Goose Farm, NJ
09/27/85
1st
Haviland •
Complex, NY
09/30/87
1 st-Fi nal
Helen Kramer, NJ
09/27/85
1 st-Fi nal
Threat/Problem
Soil, perched GW, and
debris contaminated
with mercury
GW, SW, and soil
contaminated with
VOCs including TCE,
and organics
including PCBs
Sediments and GW
contaminated with
VOCs and metals
GW and SW
contaminated with
VOCs including TCE,
organics, and
inorganics
Waste Volume
1,500 yd3
(soil)
500,000 gals
(perched GW)
4,000 yd3
(debris)
Not
specified
Not
specified
Not
specified
Components of
Selected Remedy
Onsite hydrometallurgical treatment of the
soil, perched GW, and waste-fill materials
with residue disposed of in the former
waste-fill area, followed by covering with a
clean soil cover and onsite treatment of the
leaching agent with residual discharge to
POTW; additional investigation of the GW to
determine extent of contamination; and
limited GW monitoring, if GW remediation is
not required
GW and soil flushing with GW treatment and
reinjection into soil; and conduction of
testing programs to evaluate capping and
extent of drum pit PCB contamination
GW pump and treatment with air stripping;
provision of an alternate water supply; and
excavation of contaminated sediments from
local septic disposal systems
Clay capping with slurry wall containment
system; gas collection and treatment system;
dewatering, excavation, and filling of
leachate ponds and lagoons; fencing of site
and work areas; SW controls; and GW and
leachate collection and treatment with
disposal at POTW or to SW
Cleanup Goals
Soil, perched GW, and
waste-fill material will be
treated to either 16 ppm, if
further air sampling
verifies levels exceeding
the EPA National Emission
Standard for a Hazardous
Material (NESHAP), or 21 ppm
based on risk due to
ingestion, if there are no
levels exceeding NESHAP
GW treatment system will be
designed to meet NPDES
permit limits
Specific treatment goals
will be determined during
pilot studies
Not specified
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$1,912,870
(capital)
$0 (O&M)
$3,014,000
(capital)
$0 (O&M)
$1,257,500
(capital)
$105,500
(annual O&M)
$36,478,000
or
$38,089,000
(capital)
(pendi ng
onsi te
treatment)
$1,047,900
(annual O&M)
(year 1
pretreatment)
$792,100
(annual O&M)
( compl ete
onsite
treatment)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
II Hudson River, NY
09/25/84
Ist-Final
II Hyde Park, NY
11/26/85
Ist-Final
II Katonah
Municipal Well,
NY
to 09/25/87
a>
Ist-Final
II Kentucky Avenue
Well Field, NY
09/30/86
1st
II Kin-Buc
Landfill, NJ
220-Acre
Municipal/
Industrial
Landfill
09/30/88
Icf
1 5t
Threat/Problem
Soil and river
sediments
contaminated with PCBs
GW and soil
contaminated with
VOCs, and organics
including PCBs and
dioxin
GW contaminated with
VOCs including PCE
GW contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
Sediments, GW, SW,
and air contaminated
with VOCs including
benzene and toluene,
organics including
PAHs, and PCBs, and
metals including
arsenic and lead
Waste Volume
Not
specified
80,000 tons
Not
specified
Not
specified
3,000,000
gals (oily-
phase
leachate)
1,000,000
tons (solid
waste)
Components of
Selected Remedy
In situ containment of remnant shoreline
deposits; and evaluation of Waterford water
treatment facility
Extraction and incineration of non-aqueous
phase liquids; GW pump and treatment using
activated carbon; and construction of plume
contaminant systems
Installation of a new GW production well and
onsite treatment with air stripping prior to
discharge to POTW
Extension of public water supply to private
well users; and GW monitoring
Installation of a slurry wall surrounding
the site, RCRA capping over Kin-Buc II,
portions of the low-lying area between
Kin-Buc I and the Edison Landfill, and Pool
C, as well as maintenance, and upgrading if
necessary, of Kin-Buc I cap; collection of
oily-phase leachate with off site
incineration and residual disposal;
collection and onsite treatment of
aqueous-phase leachate and contaminated GW
with discharge either to SW or POTW; and GW
monitoring
Cleanup Goals
Not specified
The 10~6 cancer risk level
will be achieved
The cleanup goal for PCE is
less than 1.0 ug/1 or
nondetectable and is based
on 10"° cancer risk level
Remedy will attain the MCL
for TCE 5 ug/1
Incineration of oily-phase
leachate will meet six nines
(99.9999%) destruction and
removal efficiency.
Aqueous-phase leachate and
contaminated GW discharge
criteria will be established
by NODEP following
treatability studies, but
will meet NJAC water quality
criteria and state
wastewater discharge
requirements. Individual
cleanup goals were not
specified
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
Not specified
$17,000
(present
worth)
O&M (not
specified)
$1,365,000
(capital)
$296,000
(annual O&M)
$303,800
(capital)
$19,000
(annual O&M)
$16,635,000 -
$16,290,000
(present
worth)
Annual O&M
varies from
$848,000
(year 1) to
$405,000
(years 12-30)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
fO
Reai on
II
II
II
II
II
II
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Krysowaty Farm,
NJ
06/20/84
Ist-Final
Lang Property, NJ
09/29/86
Ist-Final
Lipari Landfill,
NJ
08/03/82
1st
Lipari Landfill,
NJ
09/30/85
2nd
Lipari Landfill,
NJ
6-Acre
Industrial/
Municipal
Landfill
07/11/88
3rd-Final
Lone Pine
Landfill, NJ
09/28/84
Ist-Final
Threat/Problem
GW and soil
contaminated with
VOCs, organics, and
pesticides
GW, SW, soil, and
sediments
contaminated with
VOCs and metals
GW, SW, and soil
contaminated with
VOCs and organics
GW and soil
contaminated with
VOCs including
toluene, organics,
and metal s
Soil, sediments, GW,
SW and air
contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene, toluene, and
xylenes, and metals
including arsenic,
chromium, and lead
GW, SW, and soil
contaminated with
VOCs, pesticides, and
metal s
Waste Volume
Not
specified
6,500 yd3
Not
specified
Not
specified
Not
specified
Not
specified
Components of
Selected Remedy
Excavation and off site disposal of
contaminated soil and waste; and provision
for a permanent alternate water supply
Excavation and off site disposal of soils and
waste material with filling and grading; GW
pump and treatment with reinjection into
aquifer; and fencing
Capping with slurry wall containment system;
and GW collection and onsite treatment at
POTW
GW and leachate extraction with injection
wells within containment system for flushing
and dewatering with onsite pretreatment and
discharge to POTW; and flushing of
containment system for cleansing
GW/leachate pump and onsite treatment with
discharge to POTW; marsh soil excavation and
thermal treatment with of f site disposal ;
sediment dredging, dewatering and thermal
treatment with offsite disposal; temporary
measures, if necessary, to reduce volatile
emissions; and integration of offsite
sampling with onsite monitoring plan
Multi -layer surface sealing with slurry wall
containment system; and GW collection and
treatment at POTW or onsite plant
Cleanup Goals
Not specified
GW treatment effluent will
attain SDWA criteria
Not specified
Marginal successive flushing
cycle benefits and effects
of leachate release into GW
will be evaluated within
5 years
Soil cleanup will attain New
Jersey soil cleanup
objectives and health or
real-based criteria. SW
cleanup will meet Federal
Water Quality Criteria and
State surface water
standards. Individual goals
were not provided
Not specified
Present
Worth/
Capital and
$2,164,014
(capital)
$145,698
(annual O&M)
$2,322,000
(capital)
$612,000
(annual O&M)
$1,769,150
(capital)
$91,250
(annual O&M)
$3,464,000
(capital)
$715,000
(annual O&M)
$21,000,000
(present
worth)
$10,642,050
(capital)
$324,734
(annual O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
II Love Canal , NY
05/06/85
1st
Threat/Problem Waste Voluir
SW, sediments, and Not
air contaminated with specified
VOCs, organics,
pesticides including
dioxin, and metals
Components of
K? Selected Remedy Cleanup Goals
Removal and dewatering of contaminated creek CDC recommends soil
sediments; inspection of sewer reaches for treatment to TCDD 1 ug/kg
defects, repairing of damaged flood gate,
and hydraulic cleaning of designated sewers;
dredging and cleaning of culverts; berm
construction; interim onsite storage of
sediments; and installation of an
administration building
Present
Worth/
Capital and
OSM Costs
$8,929,000 -
$12,000,000
(capital)
OSM (not
specified)
II
10
oo
II
Love Canal, NY
Waste Disposal
Facility
10/26/87
Sediments and debris
contaminated with
dioxin
30,000 -
40,900 ydj
Construction of an onsite dewatering/
containment facility (DCF) and a separate
construction/ demolition debris facility
(CDF); onsite containment of sewer and creek
sediments in the DCF prior to thermal
destruction in a transportable thermal
destruction unit; onsite storage in the DCF
of leachate treatment residuals and other
"associated" material generated as a result
of remediation; and onsite storage of
uncontaminated debris in the CDF
Love Canal/93rd
Street School, NY
Waste Disposal
Area
09/26/88
3rd
Soil contaminated
with VOCs including
toluene and xylenes,
organics including
dioxins, PAHs, and
pesticides, and
metals including
arsenic and lead
7,500 yd3
Excavation and solidification or
stabilization of contaminated soil;
replacement of solidified soil into
excavation; installation of a RCRA cap; and
sampling, analysis, and monitoring of GW
The CDC level of 1 ug/kg for
dioxin in residential soils
is not implementable and
would lead to unacceptable
project delays.
Additionally, the community
is opposed to anything less
than complete thermal
destruction. As a result,
all materials (excluding
5,500 yd3 of house debris)
will be thermally
destroyed. Six nines
(99.9999%) destruction and
removal efficiency will be
the goal. Excavation to
approximately 18 inches will
ensure elimination or
reduction of risk
Soil cleanup will meet the
Land Disposal Restrictions
requirements for dioxin of
less than 1 ug/1 using the
TCLP test
$26,400,000
$31,400,000
(present
worth)
$2,295,000
$3,675,000
(capital)
$121,000
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Region Remedial Action
Threat/Problem
Waste Volume
Components of
Selected Remedy
-Eli
Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
II
II
to
CD
II
Ludlow Sand and
Gravel, NY
Landfill
09/30/88
Ist-Final
Marathon
Battery, NY
09/30/86
1st
Marathon Battery
Company, NO
Industrial
Facility
09/30/88
2nd
Soil, sediments, and
GW contaminated with
VOCs and organics
including PCBs and
phenols
SW, sediments, and
biota contaminated
with metals including
cadmium, nickel, and
cobal t
Soil, sediments, GW,
and debris
contaminated with
VOCs including PCE
and TCE, and metals
including cadmium and
nickel
10,000 yd3
(soil and
sediment)
30,083 yd3
6,100 yd3
(soil)
5,000 yd3
(sediment)
110 yd3
(dust)
Consolidation and disposal in the onsite
landfill of contaminated soil and sediments,
followed by RCRA capping; leachate/GW
collection and dewatering of the landfill
with onsite treatment and offsite residual
discharge; hydraulic containment of the
landfill through implementation of
upgradient GW controls; deed and access
restrictions; and long-term water quality
monitoring including GW, SW, and potable
water supply wells
Hydraulic dredging of sediments with
chemical fixation and off site disposal;
dredging, water treatment, and disposal;
marsh restoration; and site access
restrictions
Decontamination of the inside surfaces and
contents of the former battery facility, and
excavation of cadmium-contaminated soil and
the dredge spoils vault, followed by onsite
fixation of the excavated soil, dust and
vault sediments with offsite disposal, and
backfilling excavated areas; excavating the
VOC - contaminated soil hotspots, followed
by enhanced volatilization and replacement
of the clean residuals onsite; GW
monitoring; institutional controls; and
evaluation and performance of repairs, if
needed, to the inoperable sprinkler and
heating systems inside the former battery.
faci 1 i ty
Leachate/GW cleanup will
attain substantive
requirements of State
Pollution Discharge
Elimination System,
Technical Operations
Guidance Series, Ambient
Water Quality Standards and
Guidance Values, all GW and
SW standards, and State
Freshwater Wetlands
Standards. Soil cleanup
will attain 10 mg/kg for
PCBs based on TSCA policy
Sediments will be treated to
a 100 mg/kg established
background concentration.
Standards for total cadmium
water concentrations include
6.6 x 10-4 mg/1 and
2.0 x 10"-3 mg/1 for water
hardness levels of 50 mg/1
and 200 mg/1, respecti vely
ACLs are provided as GW
cleanup goals for indicator
compounds. The ACLs are
below Federal and State
MCLs, if available, and
include PCE 0 ug/1 and
TEC 3 ug/1. These goals
will be attained in 3-10
years by natural
attenuation. Excavation of
cadmi um-contami nated soi 1
will attain an
ATSDR-recommended level of
20 mg/kg
$3,727,200 -
$14,548,900
(present
worth)
$58,900 -
$364,900
(annual O&M)
$16,640,000
(capital)
$3,530,000
(annual O&M)
(year 1)
$180,000
(annual O&M)
(years 2-5)
$127,000
(annual O&M)
(years 6-30)
$10,010,000
(present
worth)
$775,000
(annual O&M
year 1)
$17,000
(annual O&M
years 2-30)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
II
II
II
II
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Metal tec/Aero-
Systems, NJ
06/30/86
1st
Montgomery
Township, NJ
09/29/87
1st
Montgomery
Township Housing
Development, NJ
Residential Area
06/30/88
2nd-Fi nal
Nascolite, NJ
Industrial
Facility
03/31/88
1st
Threat/Problem Waste Volume
Soil and GH 10,000 yd3
contaminated VOCs
including TCE and
PCE, and metals
including copper,
chromium, and lead
GW contaminated with Not
VOCs including TCE specified
GW contaminated with Not
VOCs including TCE specified
Soil, GW, and debris Not
contaminated with specified
VOCs and organics
Components of
Selected Remedy
Excavation with heat treatment and off site
disposal of soils; and alternate water supply
Extension of El i zabethtown water supply
system to affected residences
GW pump and treatment onsite using air
stripping with reinjection into the aquifer;
connecting remaining affected residences to
public water supply, and sealing remaining
private water supply and monitoring wells
within plume; and GW monitoring
GW pump and treatment using a method to be
determined after pilot testing, followed by
reinjection; performance of additional soil
and onsite building studies to determine
future measures; and provision of an
alternate water supply for potentially
affected residents
Cleanup Goals
MCLs and State guidelines
set action levels for GW of
TCE 5 ug/1 and PCE 5 ug/1 .
Soil action levels include
copper 170 mg/kg, chromium
(total) 100 mg/kg, and lead
100 mg/kg
Water supply will be
monitored regularly for
compliance with MCLs
GW cleanup will meet the
State MCL for TCE of 1.0 ug/1
ROD did not specify
chemical -specific goals but
indicated attainment of CWA,
SDWA, SWDA, NJSDWA, and
NJWQC. Additionally,
carci nogeni c compounds
without cleanup standards
will attain the lO"6
heal th-based ri sk 1 eve! .
Any other contaminants will
attain the goal of 5 ug/1
individually and 50 ug/1
total noncarci nogeni c and
"non-a-280" compounds
Present
Worth/
Capital and
0«M Costs
$7,005,000
(sanitary
landfill) or
$11,735,000
(RCRA
landfill)
(capital)
$179,000
(annual O&M)
$319,000
(capital)
$0
(O&M)
$2,548,000
(present
worth)
$94,000
(annual O&M)
$609,000
(capital)
$266,000
(annual O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Reaion
II
II
II
II
II
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Old Bethpage, NY
65-Acre
Municipal/
Industrial
Landfill
03/17/88
Ist-Final
Olean Well
Field, NY
09/24/85
1st
PAS Oswego, NY
06/06/84
Ist-Final
Pijak Farm, NJ
09/30/84
Ist-Final
Price Landfill ,
NJ
09/20/83
1st
Threat/Problem Waste Volume
GW contaminated with Not
benzene, and toluene, specified
and metals including
chromium and lead;
air contaminated with
methane gas and VOCs
GW contaminated with Not
VOCs including TCE specified
Soi 1 contami nated Not
with organics, VOCs, specified
and metals
GW and soil Not
contaminated with specified
VOCs, PCBs, organics,
pesticides, and metals
GW and soil Not
contaminated with specified
VOCs and organics
Components of
Selected Remedy
GW pump and treatment using air stripping
and, if necessary, carbon filtration with
discharge into an upgradient injection well
system; hydraulic control of the plume
through installation of GW recovery wells;
GW monitoring; completion of the landfill
capping (29 acres previously capped);
continuation and expansion, or enhancement,
of the leachate control and gas collection
systems; and gas monitoring
Reactivation of municipal wells;
construction of two air stripping systems
for GW treatment with discharge to public
water supply system; extension of existing
Clean water lines; inspection of McGraw
Edison industrial sewer and analysis of
repair and replacement options; and
recommendation of institutional controls to
restrict GW usage
Limited excavation and off site removal of
contaminated soil, subsurface tanks, and
drums; RCRA capping with slurry wall
containment system and site grading; and GW
and leachate recovery and treatment
Removal and off site disposal of drums and
lab packs; and excavation and off site
disposal of visibly contaminated soil with
GW pumping and removal
Replacement and relocation of the water
supply well field and transmission
facilities; and analysis of plume
management, source control and GW treatment
remedies
Cleanup Goals
The plume will be treated to
State standards or to a
zero-slope condition if one
exists following 5 or more
years of pumping.
Individual goals include
chromium 0.05 mg/1 ,
lead 0.025 mg/1,
TCE 5.0 mg/1 (MCL), benzene
non-detectable, and
tol uene 50 mg/1 . Ai r
discharge requirements also
will meet State standards.
Individual goals include
methyl ene chl oride
1.17 x ID3 ug/m3, TCE
9.0 x 10~ ug/m3, benzene
1.0 x 10^ ug/m3, and
toluene 7.5 x 103 ug/m3
GW will be treated to
TCE 5 mg/kg
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs _
$23,045,000
(present
worth)
$1,996,780
(capital)
$799,040
(annual O&M)
$1,363,700
(capital)
$117,000
(annual O&M)
$1,962,750
(capital)
$53,600
(annual O&M)
$5,070,000
(capital)
O&M (not
specified)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Suwuary Table
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Reaion Remedial Action
II Price Landfill,
NJ
09/29/86
2nd-Fi nal
II Reich Farm, NJ
Illegal Waste
Disposal Area
09/30/88
fO
to
to Ist-Final
II Renora, Inc., NJ
09/29/87
1st
II Ringwood
Mines/Landfill,
NJ
Waste Disposal
Area/Landfill
09/29/88
Ist-Final
Threat/Problem Waste Voluoe
GW contaminated with Not
VOCs including TCE, specified
organics, and
inorganics
Soil and GW 2,010 yd3
contaminated with
VOCs including PCE,
toluene, TCE and
xylenes, and organics
Soil and GW 5,500 yd3
contaminated with
VOCs, organics
including PCBs and
PAHs, inorganics, and
pesticides
Soil and GW Not
contaminated with specified
metals including
arsenic and lead, and
petroleum hydrocarbons
Components of
Selected Remedy
GW pump and onsite pretreatment with
discharge to a POTW; site capping; and
fencing
Soil excavation and onsite treatment through
enhanced volatilization and onsite disposal
and/or off site incineration and disposal; GW
pump and treatment onsite using air
stripping and carbon adsorption with
reinjection to the aquifer; and additional
GW and soil sampling
Biodegradation of 4,400 yd3 of PAH
contaminated soil; excavation of 1,100 ydj
of PCB contaminated soil with off site
disposal (landfilling or incineration); and
backfilling, grading, and revegetation
Soil sampling and excavation, if necessary,
with offsite disposal, backfilling,
regrading, and revegetation; and GW and SW
monitoring
Cleanup Goals
Extraction and treatment
will continue until TVO
concentration reaches
10 ug/1 or less in GW
GW will be treated to attain
State MCLs for TCA 26 ug/1 ,
TCE 1 ug/1 , and PCE 1 ug/1 .
Soil cleanup levels will
meet State Soil Action
Levels of total VOCs 1 mg/kg
and total semi -volatile
organics 10 mg/kg
Soil will be treated to
total VOCs 1.0 mg/kg, total
PAHs 10.0 mg/kg, total
petroleum hydrocarbons
100.0 mg/kg, cadmium
3.0 mg/kg, zinc 350.0 mg/kg,
and PCBs 5.0 mg/kg. GW will
be treated to total VOCs
50.0 ug/1 , arsenic
50.0 ug/1 , cadmium
10.0 ug/1 , chromium
50.0 ug/1, and lead 50.0 ug/1
Soil cleanup will attain the
non-promulgated New Jersey
Cleanup Objectives for lead
250 mg/kg and total
petroleum hydrocarbons
100 mg/kg. GW will attain
MCLs, including arsenic
50 ug/1 and lead 50 ug/1, by
natural attenuation
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$9,050,000
(capital)
$1,010,000
(annual O&M)
(years 1-5)
$255,000
(annual O&M)
(years 6-25)
$5,832,000
(present
worth)
$419,550
(annual O&M)
$1,401,000
(landfill ing)
(present
worth) or
$6,021,000
(incinera-
tion)
(present
worth)
$225,000
( capi tal )
$50,000
(annual O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Regi on
II
II
II
II
II
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Rockaway Borough
Well Field, NJ
09/29/86
1st
Rocky Hill, NJ
Municipal Well
Field
06/30/88
Ist-Final
Sharkey
Landfill, NJ
09/29/86
Ist-Final
Sinclair
Refinery, NY
09/30/85
1st
South
Brunswick
Landf i 11 , NJ
09/30/87
Ist-Final
Threat/Problem Waste Volume
GW contaminated with Not
VOCs including TCE specified
and PCE
GW contaminated with Not
VOCs including TCE specified
GW and soils Not
contaminated with specified
VOCs including TCE,
inorganics, and metals
Soil contaminated Not
with VOCs and metals specified
GW and SW Not
contaminated with specified
VOCs and metals
Components of
Selected Remedy
GW treatment using existing system
GW pump and treatment using air stripping
with reinjection; alternate water supply;
sealing remaining wells; and GW monitoring
Capping; and GW pump and treatment
Removal and off site disposal of 300 drums;
backfilling with clean fill; onsite
consolidation of waste from South Landfill
area with RCRA capping; site fencing; and
partial river channelization
Remediation completed in 1985 (capping,
slurry wall, and leachate collection
system). Post-remediation monitoring will
continue for 30 years
Cleanup Goals
Municipal treatment system
will be designed in
accordance with SDWA
standards to remove TCE and
PCE to 5 ug/1 each
Remediation will meet a
0.12xlO~" excess cancer
risk level. The TCE cleanup
goal of 1 ug/1 corresponds
to the proposed NJ MCL. PCE
and 1,1-dichloroethane will
be reduced to below 1 ug/1
and 2 ug/1 , respecti vel y
Not specified
GW and SW will be treated to
total organics 100 ug/1,
toluene 10 ug/1 ,
1 , 1 , 1 -tri chl oroethane
50 ug/1 , arseni c 5 ug/1 ,
zinc 30 ug/1 and PCBs
0.0095 ug/1. Soil will be
treated to toluene 72 ug/1 ,
trans-1 , 2-di chl oroethyl ene
325 ug/kg, arsenic
15,000 ug/kg, zinc
53,000 ug/kg, and PCBs
12.1 ug/kg
Chemical -specific levels
will be addressed in he post
remedial monitoring program
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$0 (capital)
$74,800
(annual (O&M)
$1,618,000
(capital)
$84,000
(annual O&M)
$23,173,000
(capital)
$330,000
(annual O&M)
$8,759,000
(capital)
$30,000
(annual O&M)
$0 (no
additional
funding
necessary)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Sunary Table
£
Region
II
II
II
II
II
II
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Spence Farm, NJ
09/30/84
1st
Suffern
Village Well
Field, NY
09/25/87
Ist-Final
Swope Oil, NJ
09/27/85
1st
Syncon Resins, NJ
09/29/86
1st
Tabernacle, NJ
Waste Disposal
Area
06/30/88
Ist-Final
Upjohn
Manuf acturi ng
Company, PR
Industrial
Faci 1 i ty
09/30/88
Ist-Final
Threat/Problem
GW and soil
contaminated with
organics, metals, and
i norgani cs
Potential
contamination of GW
with VOCs
GW and soil
contaminated with
VOCs, and organics
including PCBs
GW, soil, and
sediments
contaminated with
VOCs, PCBs, organics,
pesticides, and metals
GW contaminated with
VOCs including
1,1,1-TCA and DCE
GW contaminated with
carbon tetrachloride
Waste Volume
Not
specified
Not
appl i cabl e
Not
specified
700 yd3
2,000 yd3
Not
specified
Not
specified
Components of
Selected Renedy
Excavation and off site disposal of all
drums, lab packs, and visibly contaminated
soil; and site grading and surface
restoration
No further action with GW monitoring
Capping; removal of tanks and building
debris with off site incineration; treatment
or disposal of tank contents with off site
disposal of tanks and building debris;
excavation and off site disposal of buried
sludge waste area; and excavation and
off site disposal of PCS contaminated soil
Excavation of lagoon sediments and highly
contaminated subsurface soils with off site
disposal
Excavation and off site disposal of surface
soils; and GW pump and treatment
Installation of GW monitoring wells with
implementation of a monitoring program to
delineate extent of plume; GW treatment
using air stripping followed by reinjection;
exhaust gas analysis; and soil sampling of
former drum dumping and storage area
GW pump and treatment using air stripping
with discharge to either a GW recharge area
or a public water supply system;
installation of chloride monitoring wells
near the coastline; and GW monitoring
Cleanup Goals
Not specified
GW levels for 1,1,1-TCA
comply with the NYSDEC
guideline of 50.0 ug/1
In accordance with State
policy, soils will be
excavated up to 1.5 feet,
which contain PCBs >5 mg/kg
Soil removal to achieve PCBs
5 mg/kg, base-neutrals 100
mg/kg, TVOs 1 mg/kg, and
numerous levels for metals.
No standards have been set
for GW treatment
The proposed MCLs
established by NJDEP are
more stringent than Federal
standards and include
1,1,1-TCA 26 ug/1 and DCE
2 ug/1 • The remedi al acti on
will comply with the NJDEP
levels in anticipation that
they will become State ARARs
GW cleanup levels will meet
the MCL for carbon
tetrachloride 5 ug/1
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$845,500
(capital)
$95,300
(annual O&M)
$0
( capi tal )
$311,000
(present
worth O&M)
$5,590,356
(capital)
$33,000
(annual O&M)
$5,600,000
( capi tal )
$209,000
(annual O&M)
$772,600
(capital)
$215,600
(present
worth O&M)
$2,200,000 -
6,200,000
( capi tal )
$400,000 -
700,000
(annual O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Region Remedial Action
II Vega Alta, PR
09/29/87
1st
II Vestal Water
Supply Well 1-1,
NY
06/27/86
M
W 1st
II Volney Landfill,
NY
07/31/87
1st
Components of
Threat/Problem Waste Volume Selected Remedy
GW contaminated with 3,800,000 gpd GW pump and treatment using scaling
VOCs including TCE (supply) pretreatment, air stripping, and possibly
and PCE activated carbon with discharge to creek or
public distribution system; and the shutting
down of two wells with connection to the
public distribution system
GW contaminated with Not GW pump and treatment using air stripping;
VOCs including TCE specified alternate water supply; and cessation of
untreated discharge to river
GW contaminated with 4,000,000 Supplemental capping of landfill side slopes
VOCs and metals yd1* covering approximately 35 acres;
installation of a leachate collection system
to include a slurry wall, collection wells,
and force mains; and off site or onsite
treatment of contaminated leachate, which
will be determined during design (flow
equalization, batch biological treatment,
and carbon absorption considered)
Cleanup Goals
GW pump and treatment will
attain the 10~6
health-based risk level
which includes MCL values
for PCE
0.7 ug/1, 1,1,1-
dichloroethene 0.23 ug/1,
benzene 0.7 ug/1, and
trichloroethene 2.8 ug/1.
The ultimate attainment of
MCLs will require
identification and control
of source(s)
Not specified
Cleanup goals will meet the
MCL values for vinyl
chloride 1.0 ug/1, benzene
5.0 ug/1, and arsenic
50.0 ug/1. Additionally,
chloroform 0.0 ug/1, ickel
15.4 ug/1, and arsenic
0.0 ug/1 will meet WQC
values. Total phenols
1.0 ug/1 will meet the NY
State value
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$4,106,000
(capital)
$581,000
(annual O&M)
$389,400
( capi tal )
$119,750
(annual O&M)
$12,754,000
(off site
treatment)
( capi tal )
$12,876,000
(onsite
1 eachate
treatment)
( capi tal )
$882,000
(off site
leachate
treatment)
(present
worth O&M)
$691,000
(onsite
1 eachate
treatment)
(present
worth O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Sumary Table
Reoion
II
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Wai dick
Aerospace, NJ
09/29/87
1st
Threat/Problem
Soil contaminated
with VOCs including
TCE, and inorganics
Components of
Waste Volume Selected Remedy
10,500 yd3 In situ air stripping of 8,000 yd3 from
the saturated zone; excavation and off site
disposal of 2,500 yd3 residuals with
contamination above action levels;
institutional controls to include site
access and well restrictions; and fencing
Cleanup Goals
Soil will be excavated to
New Jersey Department of
Environmental Protection
levels which include cadmium
3.0 rag/kg, chromium 100.0
»g/kg, zinc 350.0
Present
Worth/
Capital and
08H Costs
$2,602,118
( capi tal }
$55,000
(annual O&M)
II
I
II
II
Wide Beach, NY
09/30/85
Ist-Final
GW and soil
contaminated with PCBs
Wi 11 i ams
Property, NJ
09/29/87
Ist-Final
York Oil, NY
Waste Oil
Recycli ng
Facility
02/09/88
1st
Soil and GW
contaminated with
VOCs including PCE,
organics, and metals
Soil, sediments, GW,
and SW contaminated
with VOCs, metals,
and organics
including PCBs
Not Excavation and chemical treatment of PCB
specified contaminated soil with backfilling of
treatment residuals; offsite disposal of
contami nated asphalti c materi al, and
repavement of roadways and driveways;
perched water treatment in sewer trench;
construction of hydraulic barrier at end of
sewer trench; conduction of treatability
study to determine effective PCB and soil
treatment; and sewage and sediments sampling
700 yd3 Excavation of soil with removal to an
off site disposal facility for incineration;
regrading, revegetation, and site
restoration; GW pump and treatment using air
stripping and carbon adsorption with
reinjection; and provision of an alternate
water supply to affected residences
30,000 yd3 Excavation and onsite solidification of
(soil) soils and sediments followed by onsite
disposal of treatment residuals;
8,000 yd3 installation of draw down wells to collect
(sediments) sinking plume and oil followed by onsite oil
skimmer and oil/water separator treatment
25,000 gals with subsequent offsite discharge; offsite
(tank thermal treatment of tank oils in addition
contents) to other soils collected at the site;
cleaning and demolition of empty storage
tanks; and surface grading
mg/kg,nickel 100.0 mg/kg,
total VOCs 1.0 mg/kg, and
total PHCs 100.0 mg/kg
Based on 1(H* lifetime
cancer risk, media cleanup
goals include soil 10 mg/kg,
air 1.67 ug/m3, GW
100cug/l, and SW 7.9 x
10~5 ug/1
Soil will be excavated to
the New Jersey Environmental
Cleanup Responsibility Act
(ECRA) target level of 1.0
mg/kg total VOCs. GW will
be treated to MCLs which
include TCE 5.0 ug/1,
chloroform 100.0 ug/1,
barium 1,000.0 ug/1, arsenic
50.0 ug/1, cadmium
10.0 ug/1, chromium
50.0 ug/1, and lead 50.0 ug/1
GW cleanup will attain the
State GW ARAR for any single
phenolic compound 50 ug/1
and for total phenolics
100 ug/1
$9,295,000
(capital)
$0
(O&M)
$513,750
(capital)
$64,600
(annual O&M)
$6,500,000
(capital)
$500,000
(present
worth O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
IS
Region
III
III
III
III
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Aladdin Plating,
PA
Industrial
Faci 1 i ty
09/27/88
1st
Ambler Asbestos
Piles, PA
Industrial
Facility
09/30/88
1st
Army Creek
Landfill, DE
09/30/86
1st
Avtex Fibers, VA
Industrial
Threat/Problem
Soil contaminated
with metals including
chromium
Sediments, SW, and
debris contaminated
with asbestos
GW, SW, soil, and
sediments
contaminated with
VOCs, inorganics, and
metal s
GW is contaminated
with organics
including phenols and
Waste Volume
12,000 yd3
4,500 yd3
(sediments)
1,900,000
gals (SW)
1,255,000
yd3
(debris)
1,900,000
yd3
Not
specified
Components of
Selected Remedy
Excavation and off site stabilization of
contaminated soil, followed by off site
disposal in a landfill; and replacement of
the excavated soil with clean fill
Installation of a geotextile and soil cover
over exposed areas of waste piles; erosion
control /repair; vegetative/soil cover over
both waste piles; runoff collection and
treatment; pump and filter lagoon and basins
water, followed by onsite discharge,
backfilling lagoon and basins, and onsite
disposal of collected sediments and asbestos
onto the waste piles; slope stability
control measures, if necessary after
testing; further alternative evaluations;
and access restrictions
Capping; downgradient GW pumping with
monitoring; and possible upgradient controls
GW pump and treatment and basin liquid
treatment after upgrading the existing
onsite activated sludge treatment plant; GW,
Cleanup Goals
Soil cleanup will attain a
level of chromium 50 mg/kg
Remedy addresses containment
of asbestos-contami nated
debris, therefore, no
cleanup level is provided
for the debris. SW
treatment will meet
requi rements of State
NPDES. Individual cleanup
goal not specified
Not specified
GW wi 11 be treated to meet
MCLs, EPA Reference
dose-based water limits,
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$4,461,000
(present
worth)
$5,135,000
(capital)
$46,000 --•:.
$63,000
(years 2-6)
$33,000
(years 7-30)
$12,030,000
or
$12,340,000
(upgradient
controls)
(capital)
$306,000 or
$388,000
(upgradient
controls)
(annual O&M)
$9,122,000
(present
worth)
Facility
9/30/88
1st
metals including
arsenic and lead
SW, and basin fluids monitoring; and deed
restrictions
AWQC, State drinking water
standards, NPDES
requirements and Federal and
State WQC. Individual
cleanup goals include phenol
0.3 mg/1 (AWQC), lead 0.05
mg/1 (MCL/VAGWS), and
arsenic 0.05 mg/1 (MCL/VAGWS)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Sumary Table
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
ReMon Remedial Action
III Bendix, PA
Industrial
Facility
09/30/88
Ist-Final
III Berks Sand Pit,
PA
Waste Disposal
Area
09/29/88
Ist-Final
10 III Blosenski
00 Landfill, PA
09/29/86
1st
III Bruin Lagoon, PA
06/02/82
1st
III Bruin Lagoon, PA
09/29/86
2nd-Fi nal
Threat/Problem Waste Volume
Soil and GW Not
contaminated with specified
VOCs including TCE
Sediments, SW and GW Not
contaminated with specified
VOCs including PCE,
1,1-DCE and 1,1,1-TCA
GW, SW, and soil Not
contaminated with specified
PCBs, VOCs including
benzene and TCE,
inorganics, and
pesticides
GW, SW, and soil Not
contaminated with specified
asphalt sludge, acid
liquids, waste oil,
resins, fly ash, coal
fires, sulphuric and
sulfonic acids, and
petroleum waste
Soils and bedrock 17,500 yd3
contaminated with
acidic sludges and
metal s
Components of
Selected Remedy
Soil vacuum extraction and soil aeration;
and GW pump and treatment onsite with
off site GW treated at each residential
wel 1 head
Excavation of contaminated sediments with
offsite incineration and disposal; GW pump
and treatment using air stripping and vapor
phase carbon adsorption, followed by
reinjection to the aquifer; provision of an
alternate water supply system; GW and SW
monitoring; and deed restrictions
Excavation and removal of buried drums and
other materials with RCRA offsite disposal;
alternate water supply; GW pumping with
onsite treatment; capping with SW diversion
and gas venting; and source reduction program
Removal and offsite disposal of liquid
lagoon contents with physical stabilization
of lagoons, effluent pond cleanup and dike
stabilization; capping; and GW diversion
Stabilization/neutralization of sludge and
perched liquid zone; in situ bedrock
treatment; and capping
Cleanup Goals
GW cleanup will attain a TCE
concentration level of less
than 1 ug/1 both on- and
offsite. Soil cleanup will
meet a concentration limit
of VOCs 100 ug/kg based on
GW cleanup goal
GW cleanup levels will meet
MCLs for 1,1-DCE 7 ug/1 and
1,1,1-TCA 200 ug/1.
Secondary target levels of
1,1-DCE 1 ug/1 and PCE
1 ug/1 are based on Unit
Cancer Risk. GW cleanup
will also meet the
Underground Injection
Control Regulations
Removal of contaminated
media will attain a 10~°
excess cancer risk. GW will
initially be treated to
ACLs, then to levels
established by NPDES
Not specified
Not specified
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&H Costs
$4,487,000
(present
worth)
$394,000
(annual O&M)
$10,773,100
(present
worth)
$459,200
(annual O&M)
$11,000,000-
$15,000,000
($13,000,000
(estimated
baseline
cost)
(capital)
$534,300
(annual O&M)
(years 1-2)
$1,456,000
( capi tal )
$60,000
(annual O&M)
$2,695,000
(capital)
$16,000
(annual O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
to
N>
(O
Reaion
III
III
III
III
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Chisman Creek, VA
09/30/86
1st
Chisman Creek, VA
Waste Disposal
Area
03/31/88
2nd-Fi nal
Del aware Ci ty
PVC, DE
09/30/86
1st
Delaware Sand
and Gravel , DE
27-Acre
Industrial
Landfill
04/22/88
Ist-Final
Threat/Problem Waste Volume
GW, soil (disposal 484,600 yd3
pits with fly ash),
and SW contaminated
with trace metals and
inorganics
SW contaminated with Not
metals including specified
nickel and vanadium
GW, SW, and soil 25,000 yd3
contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
Soil and GW 535,000 yd3
contaminated with (soil)
VOCs including
benzene, toluene, and
xylenes, organics
including PCBs, PAHs,
and phenols, and
metals including
chromium and lead
Components of
Selected Remedy
Capping (2 pits); capping and upgradient GW
diversion of one pit; alternate water
supply; possible deed restrictions; and GW
drainage and onsite treatment
Diversion of surface runoff from Area A
(previously capped) into Pond A; and water
quality monitoring
Excavation and removal of contaminated soils
and sludges with off site disposal; capping;
GW pumping and treatment; and alternate
water supply
Excavation and onsite incineration of
approximately 36,000 tons of contaminated
soil and waste from the Drum Disposal and
Ridge areas, followed by residual ash
disposal offsite, grading, and revegetation
of excavated areas; removal and offsite
disposal of surface debris from the Inert
area, followed by capping; construction of a
RCRA cap over the Grantham South area; GW
pump and treatment with offsite discharge;
and GW monitoring
Cleanup Goals
Action for nickel complies
wi th the AWQC for protecti on
of fresh water aquatic life
(88 ug/1 - 280 ug/1) and
salt water aquatic life
(17 ug/1)
There is no ARAR promulgated
for vanadium; however, an
unpublished Estimated
Advisory Concentration for
vanadium of 7.7 ug/1 will be
met in fresh water systems.
Remediation will attain the
Clean Water Act level for
nickel 13.4 mg/kg
Recovery wells will operate
until concentrations of VCM,
EDC, and TCE reach 1 ug/1,
0.94 ug/1, and 2.7 ug/1,
respectively, for two
consecutive sample analyses
GW cl eanup J eve! s wi 11
attain 10~" risk levels or
MCLs at the site boundary,
and meet NPDES requirements
for SW discharge.
Individual GW cleanup levels
were not specified. Soil
cleanup levels were based on
acceptable drinking water
exposure levels and include
toluene 6,000 mg/kg, xylene
4.8 mg/kg, and phenol 497
mg/kg
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs _
$14,119,000
(capital)
$506,000
(annual O&M)
(year 1)
$64,000
(annual O&M)
(years 2-30)
$137,000
(present
worth)
$1,904,000
(capital)
$43,000
(annual O&M)
$24,994,000
(present
worth)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Recrion
III
III
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Dorney Road
Landfill, PA
27-Acre
Muni ci pal
Landfill
09/29/88
1st
Doug! assvi lie, PA
09/27/85
1st
Threat/Problem
Soil and SW
contaminated with
VOCs, organics and
i norgani cs
Soil and sediments
contaminated with
VOCs, pesticides,
organics including
PAHs and PCBs, and
metals
Components of
Waste Volume Selected Resedv
700,000 gals Offsite disposal of ponded water; regrading
and installation of a multi-layer cap;
runon/runoff controls; runoff and GH
monitoring; and access and deed restrictions
Not Removal and consolidadation of contaminated
specified sediments from the drainage ditch, drainage
swale, buried lagoon, and drum disposal
areas, with onsite disposal under cap;
capping former sludge lagoon area and sludge
disposal area; insta .'~ion of levees and
Cleanup Goals
Remedy addresses control of
contaminant migration, thus
individual cleanup goals are
not applicable. Cancer risk
levels onsite will be
reduced to below 10~"
Not specified
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$14,000,000
(present
worth)
$42,000
(annual O&M)
$5,569,500
( capi tal )
$196,000
(annual O&M)
III
Doug! assvi lie
Disposal, PA
Waste Recycling
and Processing
Facility
06/24/88
2nd
Buildings, tanks,
piping, and process
equipment
contaminated with
VOCs, organics
including PCBs and
PAHs, and metals
including lead
dikes to protect from 100-year flooding
event; and soil predesign study to determine
extent of excavation and capping
200,000 gals Removal, transportation, and offsite
(tank incineration of liquid and sludge tank
contents) waste; decontamination of tanks, piping,
processing equipment, and building
materials; offsite disposal of building
rubble; selling of tanks and other metal
materials as scrap; offsite disposal of
concrete, asphalt, and other materials; and
treatment of generated decontamination
fluids, as appropriate
Tasks, piping, processing
equipment, and building
materials designated for
salvage or reuse will be
decontaminated to a level
not to exceed 100 ug/100
cnr PCBs on the surface.
Concrete, asphalt, and other
materials, which contain
PCBs and cannot be
decontaminated to less than
50 rag/kg PCBs, will be
disposed of at an offsite
hazardous waste landfill.
This operable unit does not
attempt to ensure compliance
with all ARARs for the
entire site, but will not be
inconsistent with a final
comprehensive remedy for the
site
$4,050,000
(present
worth)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
to
u
Region
III
III
III
III
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Drake Chemi cal ,
PA
09/30/84
1st
Drake Chemi cal ,
PA
05/13/86
2nd
Drake Chemi cal ,
PA
Industrial
Facility
09/29/88
3rd-Fi nal
Enterprise
Avenue, PA
05/10/84
Ist-Final
Threat/Problem
GW, SW, soil, and
stream sediments
contaminated with
VOCs, pesticides, and
inorganics
GW, soil, sludges,
buildings, and debris
contaminated with
organi cs and
inorganics
Soil, sediments, GW,
and SW contaminated
with VOCs including
benzene, toluene,
TCE, and xylenes,
organi cs including
PAHs and phenols, and
metals including
arsenic, chromium and
lead
SW and soil
contaminated with
VOCs, organi cs, and
metal s
Waste Vol ume
Not
specified
3,900 yd3
192,000 gals
252,000 yd3
(soil,
sediments,
and sludge)
Not
specified
Components of
Selected Remedy
Capping and grading of leachate stream;
partial excavation and temporary onsite
storage of contaminated sediments; and
construction of conduit and a granular drain
Incineration of onsite chemicals; demolition
and offsite removal of buildings, tanks, and
debris; waste water pump and treatment of
lagoons; metal recycling; and analysis with
possible disposal of metal decontamination
recycling fluid
Excavation of soil, sediments and sludge,
followed by onsite incineration, backfilling
(possibly using incinerator ash), and
installation of vegetation cover; GW pump
and treatment along with SW, aqueous wastes
from the leachate lagoon area, and runon,
after construction of an onsite biological
activated carbon treatment plant, followed
by offsite discharge to a stream or POTW; GW
monitoring; and flood control measures
Offsite disposal of soils which fail key
indicator parameter testing levels;
backfilling of site with soils which passed
parameter test; and grading and vegetating
as a final cover
Cleanup Goals
Not specified
Not specified
GW cleanup levels will
attain an overall risk level
of 10~5 by meeting MCLs or
MCLGs. Individual cleanup
goals were not specified
Not specified
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$445,311
( capi tal )
$9,427
(annual O&M)
$3,143,000
( capi tal )
$0 (O&M)
$97,363,000
(present
worth)
$787,000
(annual O&M)
$4,324,000
(capital)
$4,200
(annual O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Reaion
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Threat/Probleii
Waste Volume
Components of
Selected Rened v
Cleanup Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
III
to
CO
III
III
III
Fike Chemical, WV Soil, GW, and SW
Industrial
Faci1i ty
09/29/88
1st
Fischer &
Porter, PA
05/04/84
Ist-Final
Harvey-Knott, DE
09/30/85
Ist-Final
Heleva Landfill,
PA
03/22/85
Ist-Final
contaminated with
VOCs, organics
including PCBs and
methyl mercaptan,
inorganics including
acids, asbestos,
cyanide, and metals
SW contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
and PCE
GW, SW, and soil
contaminated with
VOCs, metals,
organics including
PCBs, and inorganics
GW and SW
contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
and PCE
600,000 gals Removal and offsite incineration of the tank
(SW) containing methyl mercaptan and the drums of
metallic sodium, followed by offsite
750,000 gals disposal; removal, bulking, and offsite
(tank treatment and disposal of drums on the
contents) ground surface and of the materials found in
various tanks, lines, and vessels (using
2,800 drums incineration, ion exchange or chemical
(liquid oxidation, and stabilization/fixation
waste) depending on contents); lab packing of
laboratory containers with either offsite
100,000 Ibs disposal or offsite incineration; drainage
(200 drums and stabilization of'lagoon and sewage
of metallic treatment ponds, followed by treatment and
sodium) offsite residual discharge; excavation and
offsite disposal of buried drums; and
stabilization and/or removal of
asbestos-containing insulation
Not Improvements in manufacturing facility to
specified prevent release; onsite installation of
pumping wells and packed column aeration to
reduce contaminant levels in effluents, with
discharge to SW; and treatment of
contaminated wells
Not SW collection and treatment with offsite
specified disposal; removal and offsite disposal of
sediments, sludges, bulk wastes, drums, and
debris; GW extraction and treatment with
reinsertion to soil for flushing; and site
grading with 2 foot clean soil cover
Not RCRA capping; SW diversion and gas venting
specified systems; conduction of a predesign study to
fully delineate the source of contamination
and determine sink-hole activity;
construction of an onsite treatment
facility; GW pump and treatment; and
extension of municipal water main to
affected residents
Remedy addreses the control,
stabilization, and
elimination of the imminent
hazards associated with the
site to allow for the
completion of the RI/FS
process. Lagoon liquids
will meet NPDES permit
requirements. Individual
goals were not specified
Not specified
Target soil and GW ACLs will
be established during design
GW will be treated to PCE
1.0 ug/1, TCE 1.8-5.0 ug/1,
vinyl chloride 2.0 ug/1,
1,1,1-tri chloroethane
21.7 ug/1, and toulene
15,000 ug/1
$8,000,000
(present
worth)
Not
specified
$3,572,000
(capital)
$44,000
(annual O&M)
$7,791,000
(capital)
$62,000
(annual O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Region Remedial Action
III Henderson Road,
PA
Waste Disposal
Facility
03/30/88
1st
III Industrial Lane,
ro PA
w
u
09/29/86
1st
III Kane and
Lombard , MD
09/30/87
1st
III Kimberton, PA
Industrial
Faci 1 i ty
09/30/88
1st
III Lackawanna
Refuse Site, PA
03/22/85
Ist-Final
Threat/Problem Waste Volume
Potential off site GW Not
contamination from specified
VOCs and organics
GW contaminated with Not
VOCs specified
Soil, GW, and debris 67,000 yd3
contaminated with
VOCs, organics
including PAHs and
PCBs, and metals
GW contaminated with Not
VOCs including TCE specified
SW and soil Not
contaminated with specified
VOCs, organics, and
metal s
Components of
Selected Remedv
Extraction of onsite and downgradient (if
necessary) GW and treatment using air
stripping with probable discharge to
adjacent stream and possible reinjectibn of
a portion of the GW near the injection well
as part of unsaturated zone treatment;
closure of the injection well; excavation of
contaminated oil pit sediments and removal
of significant waste, if feasible, directly
out of the injection well; installation,
operation, and maintenance of a carbon
adsorption water treatment system at
affected off site active well; deed
restrictions; GW monitoring; pilot study
testing of in-situ volatilization (ISV) or
other technology in the unsaturated zone;
and periodic reevaluation of cleanup goals
Provision of alternate water supply; and
possible GW usage restrictions
Removal of drums, hot spots, and
67,000 ydd soil with onsite soil capping;
construction of subsurface
containment/diversion system; development of
SW run-off management facility; and future
use of institutional controls
Interim remedy selects no further action
with continued GW monitoring and treatment
at residential and commercial establishments
by filtration using granular activated
carbon adsorption
Excavation and off site disposal of drums and
highly contaminated fill; leachate
collection and surface drainage diversion;
clay capping and construction of gas venting
systems; and reconstruction of access road
Cleanup Goals
GW cleanup will attain a 7 x
10"4 cancer risk level.
Complete aquifer restoration
not considered feasible due
to background
contamination. Individual
cleanup goals provided for
46 chemicals
Not specified
Chemi cal -speci f i c cl eanup
levels will be addressed in
2nd O.U.
GW treatment will attain a
10~6 risk level for VOCs.
The use of GAC filters on
impacted wells has reduced
contaminants of concern to
non-detectable levels
Excavation limits will be
determined by background
contaminant levels
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs _
$5,500,000
(without
ISV)
(present
worth) or
$12,200,000
(with ISV)
(present
worth)
$30,800
( capi tal )
$0
(O&M)
$4,692,660
( capi tal )
$28,930
(annual O&M)
$3,850,000
(present
worth)
$250,000 -
$300,000
(annual O&M)
$8,200,000
(capital)
O&M (not
provided)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Reaion
III
50
mg/kg
Present
Worth/
Capital and
OSH Costs
$23,409,000
(present
worth)
$33,900
( present
worth O&M)
$1,500,000
(capital)
$10,000
(annual O&M)
$4,000,000 -
$4,500,000
(capital)
"Minimal"
(O&M)
$1,014,000
( capi tal )
$10,000
(annual
O&M)
(year 1)
$7,500
(annual
O&M)
(year 2)
$6,401,000
(capital)
$46,000
(annual O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
en
Region
III
III
III
III
III
III
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Limestone Road,
MO
09/30/86
1st
Matthews
Electroplating,
VA
06/02/83
Ist-Final
McAdoo, PA
06/05/84
IRM
McAdoo
Associates, PA
06/28/85
2nd
Middletown Road,
MD
03/17/86
Ist-Final
Middletown
Airfield, PA
Federal Facility
12/31/87
1st
Threat/Problem Waste Volume
Soils, GW, SW, and Not
sediment contaminated specified
with VOCs including
TCE and PCE, and
metal s
GW and soil Not
contaminated with specified
metals including
chromium
GW and soil Not
contaminated with specified
organics and
inorganics
GW, SW, and soil Not
contaminated with specified
paint sludges, spent
solvents, metallic
sludges, acid and
caustic liquids,
toluene, waste
oil /water, and solid
waste
No threat None
GW contaminated with Not
VOCs including PCE specified
and TCE
Components of
Selected Remedy
Capping with grading and fencing
Extension of existing municipal water system
to affected residents
Cleaning and removal of underground waste
storage tanks; excavation and off site
disposal of visibly contaminated soil; and
evaluation of analytical results of soil
analyses
Removal and off site disposal of the onsite
tank, debris, and contaminated soil; limited
excavation of- soil; RCRA capping; SW
diversion; and site covering
No action
Provision of a potable water supply;
construction of a central treatment plant;
and GW pump and treatment using air stripping
Cleanup Goals
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Excavation of soil "hot
spots" which exceed cadimum
0.2 ug/kg, chromium
809 ug/kg, and cyanide
33 ug/kg
Not specified
GW cleanup levels will meet
a cumulative 10~° cancer
risk level for PCE 1.0 ug/1,
and MCLs for TCE 5.0 ug/1,
benzene 5.0 ug/1, and
toluene 2,000 ug/1 (MCLG)
Present
Worth/
Capital and
0&M Costs
$1,192,580
(capital)
O&M (to be
determined)
$662,000
(capital)
$292,000
(annual O&M)
$114,500
( capi tal )
$0
(O&M)
$2,360,000
(capital)
O&M (not
provided)
$0
(capital)
$0
(O&M)
$3,750,000
(capital)
$160,000
(annual O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Reaion Remedial Action
III Mill creek Dump,
PA
05/07/86
Ist-Final
III Moyer Landfill,
PA
09/30/85
10 Ist-Final
w
CD
III New Castle, DE
Waste
Disposal
Facility
03/31/88
Ist-Final
III Ordnance Works
Disposal, WV
Waste Disposal
Area
03/31/88
1st
Threat/Problem Waste Volume
Soils, sediments, and Not
GW contaminated with specified
VOCs, organics
including PCBs and
PAHs, inorganics, and
metal s
GW and SW Not
contaminated with specified
metals, VOCs
including TCE,
arsenic, and
radioactive materials
None None
Soil and sediments Not
contaminated with specified
metals including
arsenic, and organics
including PAHs and
PCBs
Components of
Selected Renedv
Excavation and onsite consolidation of soils
under a RCRA cap with site grading and
revegetation; soil capping over remaining
soil; SW management; GW pump and treatment;
and flood retention system
Soil /clay capping; erosion and sedimentation
control measures; SW diversion; leachate
collection, treatment, and discharge;
methane gas recovery and sale;
security/fencing measures; and RCRA closure
No action with SW monitoring until deletion
from NPL and implementation of State Closure
Consolidation of existing landfill waste and
application of a multi-layer RCRA cap;
excavation and onsite incineration of lagoon
area and scraped-area soils and impacted
stream sediments with onsite disposal of
treatment residuals in the landfill prior to
capping (assuming the ash is not EP toxic);
placement of clean fill in the excavated
area, followed by grading and revegetation;
implementation of surface management
techniques for drainage and sediment control
in the landfill area; and ambient air and
post-treatment moni tori ng
Cleanup Goals
Soil cleanup goals include
PCBs 10 mg/kg, PAHs
2,940 ug/kg, TCE 10 ug/kg,
phenols 9,000 ug/kg, and
toluene 1,783 ug/kg
Not specified
Concentrations of lead,
cadmium, and chromium are
below levels established as
MCLs
Risk-based cleanup levels
for indicator chemicals were
developed for arsenic 20
mg/kg, PAHs 26 mg/kg, and
mercury 175 mg/kg. A PCB
cleanup level of 5 mg/kg was
used based on EPA cleanup
goals for industrial sites
Present
Worth/
Capital and
OSM Costs
$12,000,000
$18,000,000
($15,000,000
estimated
base-line)
(capital)
$1,763,000
(present
worth 08M)
$6,293,500
(capital)
$332,000
(annual O&M)
$0
$6,718,000
(present
worth)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Region Remedial Action
Threat/Problem
Waste Volume
Components of
Selected Remedy
Cleanup Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
III
III
III
III
Palmerton Zinc,
PA
09/04/87
1st
Defoliation of
mountain side from
zinc, lead, cadmium,
and sulfur dioxide
Palmerton Zinc,
PA
Industrial
Facility/Zinc
Smelter
06/29/88
2nd
Presque Isle, PA None
09/30/87
Sediments, GW, and SW
contaminated with
metals including
cadmium, lead, and
zinc
Ist-Final
Rhinehart Tire
Fire, VA
Waste Disposal
Facility
06/30/88
Not
specified
27,500,000
tons
(smelter
process
residues)
Soil, GW and SW
contaminated with
metals including
arsenic, lead and zinc
Not
appli cable
Not
specified
Onsite installation of concrete pad with
berms to mix off site sewage sludge and fly
ash; application of lime (10 tons/acre) and
potash (80 Ibs/acre) on target areas;
application of fly ash and off site sludge on
target areas; and application of grass seed,
seedlings, and mulch
Slope modification, capping, and application
of a vegetation cover on the residue bank;
construction of SW diversion channels;
SW/leachate collection and treatment using
lime-activated filtration lagoons and/or
constructed wetlands; implementation of an
inspection, monitoring, and maintenance
plan; and wetlands restorative measures, if
necessary
No further action
Collection and gravity settling of surface
water runoff; collection, oil-water
separation and transport to POTW of shallow
GW oily seeps; increased freeboard in
existing onsite ponds; and soil erosion
control
State loading rates for
metals include cadmium 3.0
Ibs/acre, copper 100.0
Ibs/acre, chromium 100.0
Ibs/acre, lead 100.0
Ibs/acre, mercury 0.3
Ibs/acre,nickel 20.0
Ibs/acre, and zinc 200.0
Ibs/acre. The maximum dry
sludge application rate is
60 tons/acre
SW/leachate treatment levels
will meet CWA requirements
and attain SW background
levels. Individual goals
were not specified
Not specified
"Minimal" to
none
>$2,861,000
(present
worth)
(exact
figure to be
determined
during
design)
$0
Remedy addresses control of $1,332,340
contaminant migration, thus (present
individual cleanup goals are worth)
not applicable
$145,000
(O&M)
1st
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Reaion Remedial Action
III Saltville Waste
Disposal Ponds,
VA
06/30/87
1st
III Sand, Gravel &
Stone, MO
..j 09/30/85
w
00 1st
III Southern MD Wood
Treating, MO
Wood Preserving
Faci 1 i ty
06/29/88
Ist-Final
III Taylor Borough,
PA
06/28/85
1st
Threat/Problem
Soil, sediments, SW,
air, and biota
contaminated with
mercury
GW, SW, soil, and
sediments
contaminated with
organics and metals
Soil, sediments, SW,
GW, and debris
contaminated with
VOCs, and organics
including PNAs
SW, soil, and
sediments
contaminated with
VOCs including TCE,
and organics
Components of
Waste Volume Selected Remedv
Not Upgrading runon controls; treatment of waste
specified pond outfall with either sulfide
precipitation or carbon adsorption; and
institutional controls to include possible
implementation of local zoning ordinances
Not Excavation and off site disposal of hazardous
specified materials; and GW extraction and treatment
with discharge to ponds, aquifer, or creek
102,000 yd^ Excavation/dredging of soils, sediments,
(soil cement, and tank liquids and treatment using
and onsite incineration with onsite disposal of
sediments) residual ash, backfilling, regrading, and
revegetating, where necessary; installation
of a slurry wall; GW and SW pump and
treatment using activated carbon adsorption
of hydrogen peroxide and UV irradiation with
discharge to the onsite pond; installation
of a geotextile silt fence, sedimentation
basins, and/or diversion/surface management;
and GW, SW, environmental, organic vapor,
and dust monitoring
Not Removal and off site disposal of drums and
specified remnants; SW collection and treatment;
excavation and off site disposal of
contaminated soil, waste, and sediments from
two of the former drum storage areas
(areas 1 & 2) with backfilling and placement
of a 24-inch soil cover over the remaining
three former drum storage areas; and fencing
Cleanup Goals
Treated effluent discharged
into river will meet the •
State standard for mercury
0.05 ug/1 in water
GW will be treated to
background levels for heavy
metals and organic compounds
All media will attain the
cleanup goal for
carcinogenic PNAs (CPNAs) of
2.2 ppm based on the maximum
lifetime cancer risk. These
goals were established for
onsite future residents.
The ash residue is expected
to meet Best Demonstrated
Available Technology
Excavation of sediments,
soils, and wastes to
background levels
Present
Worth/
Capital and
OSM Costs
$840,052 -
$2,143,052
(capital)
$221,941 -
$258,941
(sulfide
ppt. or
carbon
system,
respectively)
(annual O&M)
$7,095,000
(capital)
$753,000
(annual O&M)
$38,163,000
(present
worth)
$44,000
(O&M present
worth)
$4,237,000
(capital)
O&M (not
provided)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
£3
CD
Region
III
III
III
III
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Taylor Borough,
PA
03/17/86
2nd-Fi nal
Tybouts Corner
Landfill, DE
03/06/86
Ist-Final
Tyson's Dump, PA
12/21/84
1st
Tyson's Dump, PA
Waste Disposal
Facility
09/30/88
2nd-Final
Threat/Problem Waste Volume
Possible GW Not
contamination with specified
VOCs and metals
Soils and GW Not
contaminated with specified
VOCs including TCE,
and inorganics
GW, SW, soil, and Not
stream sediments specified
contaminated with VOCs
GW contaminated with Not
VOCs including specified
toluene 1,2,3-
trichl oropropane, and
xylenes
Components of
Selected Remedy
No further action with semi-annual GW
monitoring
Excavation of waste and soils with onsite
consolidation and capping; and GW pump and
treatment
Excavation and off site disposal of
contaminated soils and wastes; upgrading of
the existing air stripping facility to treat
leachate, shallow GW, and surface run-on;
and excavation and off site disposal of
contaminated sediments
GW pumping and treatment using air stripping
and vapor-phase carbon, and if necessary,
GAC pol i shi ng of ai r-stri pped water wi th
off site discharge of treated water; and GW
monitoring
Cleanup Goals
Not specified
GW will be treated to the
cancer risk of 10~4 for
carcinogens, which includes
TVO 100 ug/1
Not specified
GW cleanup levels include
toluene 2.0 mg/1, 1,2,3-
trichl oropropane 0.00035
mg/1, and xylenes 0.12 mg/1
based on 10~" risk level,
MCLs, and WQC
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$0
(capital)
$8,000 or
$16,000
(annual O&M)
FS estimate:
$35,000,000
(capital)
PRP esti-
mate:
$15,000,000
(capital)
$4,600,000
(present
worth O&M)
. $5,718,000
(capital)
$351,000
(annual O&M)
$6,170,000 -
$6,910,000
(present
worth)
$424,300 -
$509,900
(annual O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Reaion Renedial Action
Threat/Problen
Haste Volume
Components of
Selected Remedy
Cleanup Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
III
to
III
III
III
Tyson's Dump, PA
Haste Disposal
Disposal Facility
03/31/88
Addendum to
12/21/84 ROD
Soil and bedrock Not
contaminated with VOCs specified
Voortman Farm, PA
Haste Disposal
Faci 1 i ty
06/30/88
Ist-Final
Hade, PA
08/30/84
Ist-Final
Hest Virginia
Ordnance Horks,
HV
03/27/87
1st
GH monitored for Not
contamination from specified
metals including lead
and cadmium
Soil contaminated Not
with organics, specified
metals, and inorganics
Soil, sediments, and 4,305
SH line contaminated
with organics and
asbestos
In situ treatment of soil and bedrock using
vacuum extraction; treatment of
vacuum-extracted water using the onsite
leachate water treatment system; and
installation of a soil cover following
treatment
No action alternative with continued GH
monitoring
Removal and offsite disposal of contaminated
soil, tires, tankers, waste piles, and
underground storage tanks; demolition of
buildings, leveling of debris, filling and
grading of property; and top soil and seed
cappi ng
In-situ flaming treatment of reactive
nitroaromatic residue; capping of treatment
residuals with nitroaromatic concentrations
>50 mg/kg; excavation, flushing, and
backfilling of reactive sewer lines; offsite
disposal of asbestos; and institutional
controls to include deed restrictions
Cleanup levels were
developed using health-based
acceptable intake levels and
hypotheti cal exposure
scenarios. The scenario
producing the most stringent
cleanup requirement was
selected as the cleanup
goal. Individual cleanup
goals were listed for 45
contaminants. Cleanup
levels for indicator
compounds include benzene
50 ug/kg, trichloroethane
50 ug/kg, PCE 50 ug/kg, and
1,2,3-trichloropropane
50 ug/kg
Currently, the GH does not
violate drinking water
standards
Not specified
Soil cleanup will attain
less than the 10~5
individual lifetime cancer
risk level. This sets the
cleanup goal of total
nitroaromatics at 50.0 mg/kg
$10,200,000
(present
worth)
$26,010
(present
worth)
$6,860
(annual O&M)
$1,580,050
(capital)
$320,000
(annual O&M)
$1,807,000
(capi tal)
O&M (not
provided)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Region
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Threat/Problem
Waste Volume
Components of
Selected Remedy
Cleanup Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
III
III
III
III
West Virginia
Ordnance Works,
WV
Industrial
Facility
09/30/88
2nd-Fi nal
Soil, sediments, and
GW contaminated with
nitroaromatics and
lead
Not
specified
Westline Site, PA Soils contaminated
with tars containing
phenols and PAHs
710 yd3
07/03/86
Ist-Final
Westline, PA
Wood Processing
Facility
06/29/88
2nd-Fina1
Wildcat
Landfill, DE
44-Acre
Industrial/
Municipal
Landfill
06/29/88 .
1st
GW contaminated with Not
VOCs including specified
benzene, and organics
Soil and GW
contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene, toluene, and
xylenes, organics
including PCBs and
metals including
arsenic
160 drums
(waste
material)
Remedy addresses three distinct areas of .
contamination. Area 1 - GW pump and
treatment with discharge to SW; purchase
land, construct a soil cover over the
contaminated area, and incorporate land into
existing wildlife preserve
Area 2 - Relocation of ponds 1 and 2,
fol1 owed by backfi 11 i ng wi th clean fi11; and
GW pump and treatment with discharge to SW
Area 3 - Installation of a soil cover; and
GW pump and treatment with discharge to SW
Excavation and offsite incineration of tar
deposits; backfilling with clean soil; and
GW verification study
No action with continued GW monitoring; and
implementation of institutional controls to
prevent the addition of new drinking water
we! 1 s
Removal and offsite disposal of drums and
drum contents with offsite disposal by
landfill ing, if not hazardous, or
incineration, if hazardous; grading, soil
cover, and revegetation of direct contact
risk areas; replacement of two domestic
wells adjacent to the site; GW monitoring;
and institutional controls including well
and land use restrictions
GW goals are based on
available standards or a
10~b cancer risk. GW
cleanup goals were provided
for six contaminants
including TNT 50 ug/1
Soils will be excavated to a
10~4 cancer risk level for
contaminants present onsite,
which is consistent with the
10~6 risk level for GW
The remedy meets the 8.93 x
10~5 increased cancer risk
level. Natural attenuation
can meet the MCL for benzene
5.0 ug/1 within a 5 to
10-year period.
Additionally, WQC and
standards have not been
exceeded
Remedy addresses control of
contaminant migration, thus
individual cleanup goals are
not applicable
$3,365,000
(present
worth)
$216,500
(O&M)
$744,000
(capital)
(O&M)
$0
(capital)
$5,400,000
(present
worth)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
4k
to
Reai on
IV
IV
IV
IV
Site Kane,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Air co, KY
2.7-Acre
Industrial
Landfill
06/24/88
Ist-Final
Al pha Chemi cal ,
FL
Industrial
Faci 1 i ty
05/18/88
Ist-Final
A.L. Taylor, KY
06/18/86
Ist-Final
Ameri can
Creosote, FL
09/30/85
1st
Threat/Problem
Soil, sediments, and
GW contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene, toluene,
EDC, PCE, and TCE,
organics including
PAHs and PCBs, and
inorganics
GW contaminated with
low-level organics
Soils, sediments, and
SW contaminated with
VOCs, PCBs, PAHs, and
metal s
Soi 1 contami nated
with aromatic
hydrocarbons
Waste Volume
5,000 yd3
(soil)
6,075,000
ft3 (GW)
(includes
volume from
Goodri ch ,
B.F. site)
Not
specified
Not
specified
Not
specified
Components of
Selected Remedy
Excavation of contaminated soil with
placement in pit area located on the
adjacent B.F. Goodrich NPL site property,
cover pit with a RCRA cap, and construct an
organic vapor recovery system to separate
VOCs from soil; construction of a flood
protection dike; installation of a leachate
extraction system around landfill and
upgrading of the existing landfill clay cap;
GW pump and treatment using air stripping
with discharge to the river; and
implementation of institutional controls
including deed restrictions
Capping of the small unlined pond; and
long-term GW and SW monitoring
Excavation of soils, sediments, and sludge
with onsite containment and capping
Excavation and consolidation of contaminated
soil from areas both on and -off the site in
an onsite RCRA landfill
..
Cleanup Goals
GW will be treated to meet
ACLs. Individual ACL goals
were calculated using a
multiplier and MCLs or
AWQCs. Individual goals
include EDC 8.5 mg/1, TCE
8.5 rag/1, PCE 1.5 mg/1, and
benzene 8.5 mg/1. Soil
cleanup levels will attain
an EDC level of 139 mg/kg
based on the allowable EDC
GW concentration
Recommended AWQC are
currently met for all wells
at the property line and
immediately downgradient of
all site areas except the
unlined pond. Capping
will manage the threat of
future releases from the
pond area and meet AWQC for
ethyl benzene 1.4 mg/1, and
1,2-dichloropropane 1.4 mg/1
downgradient of the unlined
pond
Not specified
Excavation of soils and
sludges to MCLs including
PAHs 12.0 mg/kg and benzene
0.13 mg/kg
Present
Worth/
Capital and
OSM Costs
$2,960,000
(capital)
$3,130,000
(present
worth 0&M)
( combi ned
with costs
from
Goodrich,
B.F. site)
$142,400
( capi tal )
$186,200
(present
worth O&M)
$795,349
(capital)
O&M (not
provided)
$5,678,000
( capi tal )
$50,000
(annual O&M)
(years 1-5)
$19,000
(annual O&M)
(years 6-30)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Real on
IV
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Biscayne Aquifer
Site, FL
09/16/85
Ist-Final
Threat/Problem
GW contaminated with
VOCs
Waste Volume
Not
specified
Components of
Selected Remedy
Addition of air stripping to existing water
treatment system; and operation of Miami
Spring and Preston municipal wells
Cleanup Goals
Cleanup goals based on EPA
primary drinking water
standards and the 10~6
cancer risk level have been
identified for 50 priority
pollutants
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$5,268,000
(capital)
$334,400
(annual O&M)
IV Brown Wood
Preserving, FL
Wood Preserving
Facility
04/08/88
Ist-Final
IV Celanese Fibers
Operations, NC
Industrial
Facility
03/23/88
1st
IV. Chemtronics, NC
Waste Disposal
Facility
04/05/88
Ist-Final
Soil, sediments,
sludge, and
wastewater
contaminated with
creosote constituents
including PAHs
GW contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene and PCE,
organics including
phenols, and metals
including chromium
Soil and GW
contaminated with
VOCs, organics, ,
metals, pesticides,
and explosives
3,000 yd-* Removal, treatment (if necessary), and
(creosote discharge of lagoon water to a POTW;
sediments/ excavation, treatment, and offsite disposal
sludge) of 1,500 tons of the most severely
contaminated soil/sludge; onsite
biodegradation of approximately 10,000 tons
of the remaining soils in a 14-acre
treatment area constructed with a liner and
an internal drainage and spray irrigation
system; covering of treatment area with
clean fill after bioremediation; and GW
monitoring
Not GW pump and treatment onsite using air
specified stripping, biological treatment, and carbon
adsorption (if necessary), followed by
discharge to the onsite wastewater treatment
plant
Not Multi-layer capping of 5 disposal areas with
specified fencing, placement of a vegetative cover
over the cap, and installation of a gas
collection/ventilation system, if necessary;
treatability studies for soils associated
wi th Di sposal Area 23 to detemvi ne the most
appropriate soil fixation/stabilization/
solidification process and mixing ratios
followed by onsite capping; GW pump and
treatment which may include air stripping,
carbon adsorption, or metal removal with
discharge and treatment to be determined
during design; and sediment, GW, and SW
monitoring
Cleanup levels will meet a
10-° health-based risk
level accomplished by
reducing the concentration
of total carcinogenic
indicator PAH compounds to
100 mg/kg throughout the
volume of the material
treated
GW cleanup will attain
Federal or State MCLs,
whichever is more
stringent. Individual
cleanup goals were not
speci f i ed
GW cleanup levels were based
on MCLs and several TBCs.
Some individual goals
include: TCE 0.005 mg/1,
benzene 0.005 mg/1, PCE
0.007 mg/1; toluene 2.0
mg/1, RDX 0.035 tng/1, TNT
0.044 mg/1, lead 0.05 mg/1,
and chromium 0.05 mg/1.
Some individual soil cleanup
goals include: PCBs 10
mg/kg, RDX 95 mg/kg, TNT 305
mg/kg, and CS 43.3 mg/kg
$2,740,000
(present
worth)
$2,032,000
(present
worth)
$1,069,230
(present
worth O&M)
$6,247,300
$8,242,900
(present
worth)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Real on
IV
IV
IV
IV
IV
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Col eman Evans, FL
09/25/86
Ist-Final
Davie Landfill ,
FL
09/30/85
1st
Distler
Brickyard, KY
08/19/86
1 st-Fi nal
Distler Farm, KY
08/19/86
1 st-Fi nal
Flowood, MS
Industrial Area
09/30/88
1 st-Fi nal
Threat/Problem Haste Volume
GW, soil, and 9,000 yd3
sediments
contaminated with
VOCs, organics
including PCP, and
metals including
chromi urn
GW and sludge lagoon 75,000 yd3
contaminated with
organics, and
inorganics including
cyanide and sulfide
GW and soils 8,000 yd3
contaminated with
VOCs including TCE,
metals, and inorganics
GW and soils Not
contaminated with specified
VOCs including TCE
and PCE, metals, and
inorganics
Soil and sediments 6,000 yd3
contaminated with lead
Components of
Selected Reined v
Excavation of PCP contaminated soils and
sediments with onsite incineration;
backfilling with decontaminated soil; GW
recovery, storage and analysis; possible
onsite GW treatment using carbon adsorption
with discharge to surface
Dewatering and stabilization of sludge
lagoon contents and placement in single
1 i ned eel 1 ; and cappi ng
Excavation and off site disposal of all
contaminated soil; backfilling with clean
natural granular soils; and GW pump and
off site treatment at POTW with reinjection
into the aquifer
Excavation and off site disposal of all
contaminated soil; backfilling with clean
natural granul ar soi 1 ; and GW pump and
off site treatment at POTW with reinjection
of uncontami nated water into the aquifer
Excavation and stabilization/solidification
of contaminated soil and sediments, followed
by backf i 1 1 i ng and cappi ng wi th cl ean f i 11 ,
as necessary; and GW monitoring
Cleanup Goals
All soils containing PCP in
excess of 10 mg/kg will be.
excavated. GW will be
treated to levels which
comply with Drinking Water
Standards or Water Quality
Cri teri a
Cleanup goals prevent
exceedance of drinking water
standards or the 10~"
cancer risk level
GW will be treated and soil
will be excavated to
background levels
GW will be treated and soil
will be excavated to
background levels
Soil and sediments cleanup
levels will attain lead 500
mg/kg, a risk-based level
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$3,000,000 -
$3,800,000
(capital)
$0
(O&M)
$3,000,000 -
$3,700,000
(capital)
$100,000
(annual O&M)
$7,500,000
(present
worth)
$1,568,000
(annual O&M)
(years 1-2)
$44,000
(annual O&M)
(years 3-30)
$11,138,400
(capital)
$113,600
(annual O&M)
(years 1-10)
$20,000
(annual O&M)
(years 11-
30)
$2,000,000
(present
worth)
$25,000
(O&M,
year 1)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Reaion
IV
IV
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Gall away Ponds,
TN
09/26/86
1 st-Fi nal
Geiger (C&M
Oil), SC
03/27/87
let
1 o L
Threat/Problem
Pond sediments
contaminated with
pesticides and
inorganics
Soil and GW
contaminated with
VOCs, organ ics
including PCBs, and
metal s
Components of
Waste Volume ; Selected Remedy
1,600 yd3 Excavation of sediments with onsite
consolidation; RCRA site closure; pond water
dilution with discharge to tributary; and
institutional controls
11,300 yd3 Excavation and onsite thermal treatment of
soil followed by solidification/
62,000,000 stabilization with backfilling of excavated
gals areas using grading and covering; and GW
pump and treatment with discharge to SW
Cleanup Goals
Pond water dilution will
meet Ambient Water Quality
Criteria
Specific preliminary goals
for soil based on MCLs to
include lead 166.5 mg/kg,
chromium 3.7 mg/kg, benzene
14.4 mg/kg, trans-1,
2-di chl oroethyl ene
76.0 ug/kg, toluene
971.0 ug/kg, and PCB
Present
Worth/
Capital and
$344,735
(capital)
$163,265
(present
worth O&M)
$6,917,000-
$7,693,400
(present
worth)
$367,200
(present
worth O&M)
IV
Gold Coast, FL
09/11/87
1 st-Fi nal
Soil and GW
contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
and PCE, and metals
1,500 yd3 Stabilization/solidification of 1,000 yd3
metal contaminated soil with onsite disposal
100,000 gals and capping; excavation of 500 yd3 soil
and sludges with offsite disposal at a RCRA
facility; GW pump and treatment (to be
identified during design) with offsite
discharge; and well closure
(Aroclor 1254) 1,050 ug/kg.
GW will attain the
cumulative 10~5 cancer
risk level which includes
MCL values for benzene
5.0 ug/1, toluene
175.0 ug/1, and lead
50.0 ug/1
Soils will be excavated to
the 10~4 health-based risk
level which includes lead
100.0 mg/kg. GW treatment
will attain MCLs for VOC
contamination which include
1,1-dichloroethane 5.0 ug/1,
methyl ene chloride 5.0 ug/1,
trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
70.0 ug/1,
tetrachloroethylene
3.0 ug/1, toluene
340.0 ug/1, and
trichloroethylene 3.0 ug/1
$3,711,660
(capital)
$74,850
(present
worth O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Suiwary Table
IV
IV
IV
IV
IV
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Goodrich, B.F.,
KY
(RI/FS prepared
as B.F.
Goodrich/Airco
site)
1-Acre
Industrial
Landfill
06/24/88
Ist-Final
Hipps Road
Landfill, FL
nn /ni /O£
09/03/86
Ist-Final
Hollingsworth, FL
04/10/86
Ist-Final
Independent
Nail, SC
09/28/87
let
Idv. •
Independent
Nail, SC
Industrial
Faci 1 i ty
08/30/88
2nd-Fi nal
Threat/Problem
Soil, sediments, and
GW contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene, toluene,
EDC, PCE and TCE,
organics including
PAHs, and PCBs and
i norgani cs
GW contaminated with
VOCs including TCE,
and metal s
GW and soil
contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
Soil and sediments
contaminated with
metals
GW contaminated with
metals including
chromium
Waste Volume
5,000 yd3
(soil)
6,075,000
ft3 (GW)
(includes
volume from
Airco, KY
site)
Not
specified
Not
specified
6,200 yd3
Not
appl i cabl e
Components of
Selected Remedy
Excavation of contaminated soil with
placement in pit area, cover with a RCRA cap
and construct an organic vapor recovery
system to separate VOCs from soil;
construction of a flood protection dike;
installation of a leachate extraction system
around landfill and upgrading of the
existing landfill clay cap; GW pump and
treatment using air stripping with discharge
to the river; and implementation of
institutional controls including deed
restrictions
GW pump and treatment at POTW; RCRA Subtitle
D landfill closure; and institutional
control s
Excavation, aeration and onsite replacement
of VOC contaminated soil; and GW pump and
treatment with reinjection into the aquifer
Excavation of metal contaminated soil and
lagoon sediments with
solidification/stabilization; backfilling of
treated soil; and covering
No action remedy
Cleanuo Goals
GW will be treated to meet
ACLs. Individual ACL goals
were calculated using a
multiplier and MCLs or
AWQCs. Individual goals
include EDC 8.5 mg/1,
TCE 8.5 mg/1, PCE 1.5 mg/1,
and benzene 8.5 mg/1. Soil
cleanup level will attain an
EDC level of 139 mg/kg based
on the allowable EDC GW
concentration
GW will be treated to meet
SDWA requirements, Water
Quality Criteria Human
Health Standards, or the
10~" cancer risk
GW cleanup goals-will be
based on the 10~b cancer
risk level and State
Drinking Water Standards
Soil will attain a 10"6 or
less, cancer risk level
which includes cadmium
2.6 mg/kg, chromium
5.3 mg/kg, cyanide
0.02 mg/kg, nickel
18.0 mg/kg, and zinc
1,785.0 mg/kg
GW poses no threat, thus
individual cleanup goals are
not applicable
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$2,960,000
(capital)
$3,130,000
(present
worth 0&M)
( combi ned
with costs
from Airco,
KY site)
$3,900,000-
$4,400,000
(capital)
OSM (not
provided)
$653,730
(capital)
$364,215
(annual O&M)
$1,032,000
(capital)
$22,500
(annual O&M)
(years 1-2)
$5,600
(annual O&M)
(years 3-30)
$0
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
10
Region
IV
IV
IV
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Lees Lane
Landfill, KY
09/25/86
2nd-Final
Miami Drum
Services, FL
09/13/82
1st
Mowbray
Engineering, AL
09/25/86
Ist-Final
Threat/Problem Waste Volume
GW, SW, and soil 212,400 tons
contaminated with
VOCs, metals, and
i norgani cs
GW and soil Not
contaminated with specified
organics, pesticides,
and metals
Swamp soils 4,800 yd^
contaminated with PCBs
Components of
Selected Remedy Cleanup Goals
Removal of exposed drums and off site ACLs will be developed from
disposal; capping of hot spots and exposed GW monitoring data
trash areas; gas collection and venting
system; possible alternate water supply;
bank stabilization; and institutional
controls
Excavation and off site disposal of soil; and Not specified
treatment of GW encountered during excavation
Excavation of PCB-contami nated soil with Soils with 25 mg/kg PCBs or
either onsite incineration, off site greater will be excavated
incineration, or ,and treated
solidification/stabilization of the waste
Present
Worth/
Capital and
$2,343,000
(capital)
$127,440
(annual O&M)
$1,568,660
(capital)
$0
(O&M)
$1,200,000 -
$2,000,000
(off site
incineration)
(present
worth)
$1,100,000 -
$1,800,000
(onsite
incineration)
(present
worth)
$750,000
(solidifica-
tion/stabili-
zation)
(present
worth)
(O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Sumary Table
i
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
IV National Starch
and Chemical
Corporation, NC
Industrial Plant
09/30/88
1 *»4-
1st
IV Newport Dump, KY
03/27/87
1st
IV N.W. 58th Street
Landfill, FL
09/21/87
3rd-Final
IV Palmetto Wood
Preserving, SC
09/30/87
Threat/Problem Waste Volume
GW, SW, and sediments Not
contaminated with specified
VOCs including
benzene, TCE, toluene
and xylenes, and
metals including
chromi urn
Soil and GW 1,000,000
contaminated with ydj
organics including
PCBs and PAHs, and
metals
GW contaminated with 27.000,000
VOCs including TCE yd3
and PCE, and metals
Soil and GW 19,895 yd3
contaminated with
metals 10,500,000
gals
Components of
Selected Remedy
Installation of a GW interception and
extraction system downgradient of the source
areas with pretreatment including air
stripping, filtration through an activated
carbon filter, metal removal, or treatment
through existing lagoon system which
includes presetting and surface aeration;
and SW and sediment monitoring. If the POTW
declines to accept the treated GW, it will
be discharged to a local stream under a
NPDES permit
Implementation of multimedia monitoring
program; restoration and extention of
leachate collection system; and restoration,
regrading, and bank stabilization of
existing clay cap with revegetation
Landfill closure for all contaminated soil;
controlling leachate generation through
grading, drainage control, and capping; and
provision of an alternate water supply to
private well users east of landfill
Excavation of contaminated soil with onsite
flushing and backfilling of treated soil;
pumping of wastewater to onsite treatment
facility; GW pump and treatment with off site
discharge to SW; and installation of
Cleanuo Goals
GH cleanup goals were
provided for the 25
chemicals of concern and
will meet MCLs, if
available. If an MCL is not
available, the cleanup goal
for a carcinogen is set at
the limit of detection; and
for a noncarcinogen, at the
RfD or ACI equivalent
level. However, ethyl
benzene will meet the
proposed MCLG. Individual
cleanup goals include:
arsenic 10 ug/1 (MCL),
benzene 5 ug/1 (MCL) , TCE
5 ug/1 (MCL), chromium
2,000 ug/1 (MCL), and
xylenes 340 ug/1 (MCL)
PCBs, nickel, toluene, and
other organics will be
treated to the 10~b
health-based risk level.
Barium and chromium will
attain the MCL values of
1,000.0 ug/1 and 50.0 ug/1,
respectively
The GW remedial action, as
required in the 1985 ROD,
will provide air stripping
to bring contaminants into
compliance with MCLs
Soil cleanup will attain
public health evaluation
levels which include
chromium 627.0 mg/kg and
arsenic 200.0 mg/kg. GW
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$3,036,000
(present
worth)
$55,000
(annual OSM)
$516,000
(capital)
$63,000
(annual O&M)
(years 1-2)
$35,000
(annual O&M)
(years 3-30)
$5,500,000
(present
worth)
$1,500,000
(O&M)
(present
worth O&M)
$1,393,000
( capi tal )
$176,163
(annual O&M)
Ist-Final
municipal water!ine to affected residents or
the drilling of new wells
will attain MCL values which
include chromium 50.0 ug/1,
copper 1,000.0 ug/1, and
arsenic 50.0 ug/1
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
(O
Reai on
IV
IV
IV
IV
IV
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Parramore
Surplus, FL
Ist-Final
Pepper's Steel ,
FL
03/12/86
Ist-Final
Perdido
Groundwater, AL
Waste Spill Area
09/30/88
Ist-Final
Powersville
Landfill, GA
09/30/87
Ist-Final
Pioneer Sand, FL
09/26/86
Ist-Final
Threat/Problem
Possible
contamination of GW
with metals
GW, soil, and
sediments
contaminated with
organics including
PCBs, and metals
GW contaminated with
benzene
Soil and GW
contaminated with
VOCs, organics,
pesticides, and metals
Soil and pond waters
contaminated with
VOCs, sludges,
metals, and inorganics
Waste Volume
Not
appl i cab! e
PCB>1 mg/kg,
approximatly
48,000
yd3; lead
> 1000
mg/kg,
21.500
yd3;
arsenic > 5
mg/kg, 9,000
yd
(waste
quantities
not
additive)
Not
specified
Not
specified
Not
specified
Components of
Selected Remedy
No further action with monitoring of GW and
SW
Excavati on , sol i di f i cati on/stabi 1 i zati on ,
and onsite disposal of soil; collection and
offsite disposal of free oil; and land use
institutional controls
GW pump and onsite treatment using air
stripping or carbon adsorption with
reinjection into the aquifer; and GW
monitoring
Capping with grading; installation of
monitoring wells and gas vents; provision
for alternate water supply (extension of
existing municipal water supply); and
institutional controls including deed
restrictions to restrict drilling or
construction activities
RCRA Subtitle D landfill closure; leachate
collection, treatment, and onsite disposal;
SW treatment and onsite discharge; and cover
system for sludge and pond waste
Cleanup Goals
Cleanup standards to be
reviewed as part of GW
quality assessment include
MCLs and WQC
Excavation of soil exceeding
PCS 1 mg/kg, lead
1000 mg/kg, and arsenic
5 mg/kg
GW cleanup level will attain
the MCL for benzene 5 ug/1
Current contaminant
concentration levels do not
exceed SDWA
Not specified
Present
Worth/
Capital and
$21,000
(capital)
$19,000
(annual O&M)
$5,212,000
(capital)
$42,500
(annual O&M)
$169,000
(capital)
$103,000
(annual O&M)
$4,000,000
(capital)
$577,013
(present
worth O&M)
$462,025
(capital)
$45,000
(O&M)
(year 1)
$34,900
(annual O&M)
(years 2-30)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Suroary Table
Site Nasie,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
IV Sapp Battery, FL
09/26/86
Ist-Final
Threat/Problem
GW, SH, soils, and
sediments
contaminated with
metals
Haste Volume
94,000 yd3
(soil)
20,000 yd3
(sediments)
Components of
Selected Remedy
Excavation, solidification/fixation, and
onsite disposal of solidified soil and
sediments; GH pump and treatment; SW
treatment and discharge; and assessment of
potential institutional controls
Cleanup Goals
Cleanup criteria for
indicator chemicals were set
based on Federal and State "
standards and risk-based
1 evel s
Present
Worth/
Capital and
n&M Costs
$14,318,544
(capital)
$25,631
(annual O&M)
IV
IV
SCRDI/Dixiana, SC
09/26/86
Ist-Final
Sodyeco, NC
09/24/87
Ist-Final
IV
Tower Chemi cal,
FL
07/09/87
1st
GW contaminated with
VOCs including PCE,
organics including
PAHs and PCBs,
inorganics, and
pesticides
Soil, SW, and GW
contaminated with
VOCs including TCE,
and organics
including PAHs
Not
specified
150 yd3
(area D
soil)
Soil and GW
contaminated with
pesticides and metals
4,000 yd3
100,000,000
gals
GW pump and treatment vrith discharge to SW
Excavation and incineration of 150 yd3_,of
contaminated soil in area D and backfilling
with clean soil; onsite treatment of
contaminated soil in area C which may
include flushing, soil washing, thermal
processing, or in-situ steam stripping;
capping of area 3 with asphalt; and GW pump
and treatment with discharge to SW
Excavation and onsite thermal treatment of
4,000 yd3 of soils and contaminated drum
contents; decontamination of debris;
residual analysis (if non-hazardous,
backfill treated soil and debris onsite); GW
pump and onsite treatment using filtration
and activated carbon with offsite discharge
to SW; installation of two individual
treatment units for private wells; and
institutional controls to include access
restrictions
GW will be treated to attain
the ACL equivalent to 10~°
excess cancer risk
Soil treatment will attain
all ARARs following GW
remediation. GW cleanup
goals are based on MCLs,
AWQC, MCLGs, NAAQ, and
public health evaluation
levels which include TCE
2.7 ug/1, PCE 0.8 ug/1,
toluene 2,000.0 ug/1, xylene
440.0 ug/1, total PAHs 2.8
ng/1, chlorobenzene
60.0 ug/1, 1,2-OCE
400.0 ug/1, and ethyl benzene
680.0 ug/1
Soil cleanup goals will
attain a TO"6 health-based
risk level, which includes
copper 100.0 mg/kg, lead
100.0 mg/kg, arsenic
5.0 mg/kg, and DDT
35.0 mg/kg. GW treatment
will attain Florida
Administrative Code levels,
drinking water health
advisory levels, 10~°
health based levels, and
alternate concentration
levels (based on lO"6 risk
level), which include
arsenic 0.05 ug/1, nickel
350.0 ug/1, chromium
0.05 ug/1, alpha-BHC
0.05 ug/1, chloroform
5.0 ug/1, DDT 0.01 ug/1,
chlorobenzilate 1.0 ug/1,
and dicoto 1.0 ug/1
$751,250
(capital)
$2,128,100
(annual (O&M)
$2,089,000 -
$3,865,000
(present
worth)
$6,788,000
(capital)
$0
(O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Reaion
IV
IV
IV
IV
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Tri-City Oil, FL
09/21/87
Ist-Final
Varsol Spill
Site, FL
03/29/85
1st
Wamchem, SC
Industrial
Facility
06/30/88
let
1 bt
Whitehouse Waste
Oil Pits, FL
05/30/85
Ist-Final
Threat/Problem Waste Volume
None Not
appl i cabl e
None Not
specified
Soil and GW 2,000 yd3
contaminated with
VOCs and organics
GW, SW, and soil Not
contaminated with specified
VOCs including
benzene, metals
including chromium,
and organics
including phenols and
PAHs
Components of
Selected Remedy Cleanup Goals
No further action Contaminant concentration
levels are below analytical
detection limits
No further action Not specified
Excavation and low temperature thermal GW cleanup goals were based
aeration of contaminated soils followed by on federal AWQC and include:
onsite disposal; GW pump and treatment using benzene 0.7 mg/1, toluene
carbon adsorption; and GW monitoring 5.0 mg/1, xylenes 2.0 mg/1.
Soil cleanup goals were
based on estimates of
contaminants that would not :
result in future exceedences
of AWQL in GW at the source
due to soil contaminant
leaching. Some individual
goals include: benzene
2.43 mg/kg, toluene
34.47 mg/kg, total xylene
67.58 mg/kg, and naphthalene
74.57 mg/kg
Slurry wall construction; GW pump and GW and SW quality should
treatment; removal of contaminated meet State primary drinking
sediments; and RCRA capping of the entire water standards. Soil and
site sediments will be removed to
background or "minimal" risk
1 evel s
Present
Worth/
Capital and
$0
$0
$1,310,600
(capital)
$155,100
(annual O&M)
$3,049,000
(capital)
$96,630
(annual O&M)
IV
Zellwood, FL
Waste Disposal
Facility
12/17/87
Ist-Final
Soil, sediments,
sludge, and GW
contaminated with
organics, metals,
inorganics, and
pesticides
147,825 tons Excavation of soils and sediments with
onsite thermal destruction; residual testing
to determine final ash disposal; GW pump and
treatment with flushing of treated GW
through the abandoned drum area; and GW
monitoring
Not specified
41,264,000
1,908,000
(present
worth)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Reerion
V
V
V
V
V
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
A&F
Material s-Greenup,
IL
11 723/83
IRM
A&F Materials
Company, IL
06/14/85
2nd
£.11 U
A&F Materials, IL
08/14/86
3rd-Final
Acme Solvents, IL
09/27/85
1st
Allied/Ironton
Coke, OH
Industrial
Facility
09/29/88
2nd— Fi nal
Threat/Problem Waste Volume
GW and soil Not
contaminated with specified
organics including
PCBs, metals, and
inorganics
Soil and SW Not
contaminated with specified
organics including
PCBs, and metals
GW contaminated with Not
VOCs including TCE, specified
inorganics, and metals
GW and soil Not
contaminated with specified
organics including
PCBs, VOCs including
TCE, and inorganics
Soil and GW 456,000 yd3
contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene, and organics
including phenols and
PAHs, and metals
Components of
Selected Remedy
Removal and off site disposal of contaminated
tank liquids and drum wastes; and temporary
capping of lagoons
Removal and off site disposal of all
contaminated soil; cleaning and removal of
onsite equipment and buildings; soil testing
beneath the building with disposal if above
recommended action levels; site grading; and
removal of site fencing
GW monitoring with installation of
additional monitoring wells; and
institutional controls
Provision for interim alternate water supply
system by installation of home carbon
treatment units; and excavation and off site
disposal of non-incinerable wastes and
incineration of other waste materials and
soils
Installation of a containment system
including a slurry wall surrounding the
disposal area and multi -media RCRA cap; GW
pump and treatment using activated carbon
with residual discharge to the Ohio River;
provision of an alternate drinking water
source; deed restrictions; preparation of a
supplemental RI/FS addressing nonaqueous
phase substance contamination with
implementation of remedy, if different from
present containment; and GW monitoring
CleanuD Goals
Not specified
Soil > 1 mg/kg PCBs will be
removed. Other Action
Levels for key contaminants
include benzene 1 ug/gm,
toluene 12 ug/gm,
trichlorethylene 1 ug/gm,
chromium 80 ug/gm, and
cadmium 5 ug/gm
Not specified
Not specified
GW cleanup levels are based
on MCLs, AWQCs and 10~°
health-based levels and
incude benzene 5 ug/1 (MCL),
phenols 300-3,500 ug/1, and
PAHs 0.005 ug/1
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$111,000
t • L *1 \
(capital)
nou /nnf
UCtr] l nut
• • • j \
privided)
$824,000
(capital)
O&M (not
provided)
PRP
responsibilty
To be
determi ned
$13,130,000
(present
worth)
$515,000
(annual O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Reaion Remedial Action
V Arcanum Iron &
Metal, OH
09/26/86
Ist-Final
V Arrowhead
Refinery, MN
10
S 09/30/86
Ist-Final
V Belvidere
Landfill, IL
19.3-Acre
Industrial/
Municipal
Landfill
06/30/88
Ist-Final
V Berlin & Farro,
MI
02/29/84
1st
Threat/Problem
GW, SW, soil, and
sediments
contaminated with
inorganics including
lead, antimony, and
arsenic
GW, SW, soil, and
sediments
contaminated with
VOCs, organics
including PAHs, and
metals including lead
GW and soil
contaminated with
organics including
PAHs and PCBs, and
metals including lead
SW, soil , and air
contaminated with
VOCs, and organics
including PCBs
Waste Volume
Onsite
soils with
>500 mg/kg
1 ead ,
20,000 yd3;
battery
casing
chips,
3,800 yd3;
of f si te
soils not
specified
4,600 yd3
(sludge)
20,500 yd3
(soil
and
sediments)
790,000 yd3
Not
specified
Components of
Selected Remedy
Excavation and off site disposal of soil with
•>500 mg/kg lead; excavation and onsite
disposal of soil with lead between
background and 500 mg/kg; removal of battery
casings; conduction of treatability studies
and onsite landfill ing; and deed
restrictions on land and aquifer usage
Excavation and onsite incineration of
contaminated soil, sediments, and sludge; GW
pump and treatment; and extension of
municipal water supply system to affected
residents
RCRA capping over entire landfill;
remediation of soil from the drum disposal
area following sampling to determine extent
of PCB contamination; GW pump and treatment
possibly using air stripping with either
discharge to the river or city treatment
plant; GW, pond, and river fish monitoring;
fencing; deed restrictions; and flood
control measures
Excavation of contaminated landfill, drum,
and soil areas; separation of PCB and
non-PCB wastes with off site disposal;
off site incineration of liquid wastes and
landfill ing of solid wastes; and backfilling
or capping of site
Cleanup Goals .
Soil cleanup goals based on
CDC Acceptable Daily Intake
levels including off site
disposal of lead >500 mg/kg
and onsite disposal of lead
between background and
500 mg/kg. Excavation of
off site soils will be
conducted until background
levels are reached
Soils and sediments will be
excavated antL treated to
achieve a 10~° excess
cancer risk level. GW
treatment will also achieve
the 10"6 level
GW will be treated until a
10"6 cumulative life-time
cancer risk is met at the
boundary, which is the point
of compliance. PCBs >
50 mg/kg will be disposed
of, or incinerated,
offsite. PCBs < 50 mg/kg
will be consolidated on the
landfill. Quantitative
goals were not specified for
other indicator chemicals
Not specified
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$9,929,000
( capi tal )
$37,000
(annual O&M)
$22,000,000
( capi tal )
$130,000 -
$180,000
(annual O&M)
$5,900,000
(capital)
$271,000
(annual O&M)
Not specified
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Sumnary Table
Reai on
V
V
V
V
V
V
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Burlington
Northern, MN
06/04/86
Ist-Final
Burrows
Sanitation, MI
09/30/86
Ist-Final
Byron/Johnson
Salvage, IL
03/13/85
1st
Byron/Johnson
Salvage Yard, IL
09/23/86
2nd
Cemetery Dump, M
09/11/85
1st
Charlevoix, MI
06/12/84
IRM
Threat/Problem Waste Volume
GH and soil 9,500 yd3
contaminated with
organics
GW, SW, soil, and 250 yd3
sediments
contaminated with
metals, and
inorganics including
cyanide
Soil contaminated Not
with VOCs, organics specified
including PCBs, and
metals including lead
and arsenic
GW contaminated with Not
VOCs including TCE, specified
metal s , and
inorganics including
cyanide
GW and soil Not
contaminated with specified
VOCs, and organics
including PCBs
GW contaminated with Not
VOCs including TCE specified
and PCE
Components of
Selected Reined v
Excavation and onsite aerobic breakdown and
transformation of contaminated soils and
sludges; and onsite RCRA capping
Excavation, solidification/fixation, and
off site disposal of metal hydroxide sludges;
and GW pump and treatment
Excavation and off site disposal of drums;
off site RCRA disposal of EP toxic soils and,
if possible, incineration or treatment of
liquids; and in-situ treatment of cyanide
contaminated soil
Provision of home carbon -treatment units and
bottled water as an interim alternate water
supply
Excavation and off site RCRA disposal of 250
drums
Provision for a permanent alternate water
supply
Cleanup Goals
Possible goals are to
achieve detoxification of
soils as defined by the
microtox test and achieve
total PAH and benzene
extractable concentrations
in the treatment zone equal
to or less than
concentrations present in
the soil left in place
GW cleanup based on current
lowest regulated
concentrations for each
indicator chemical .
Criteria will be taken from
the SDWA, Acceptable Chronic
Intake Levels, and Health
Advisories. Soil cleanup
will be based on the
site-specific Endangerment
Assessment
Remedy consists of treatment
of soil that exceeds 100
times the drinking water
standard, and onsite
treatment of soil containing
71 mg/kg amenable cyanide
Remedy will comply with
10~° cancer risk levels
for suspected carcinogens
Not specified
Not specified
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$582,000
(capital)
$36,000
(annual O&M)
$1,256,700 -
$1,335,400
(depending
on distance
to off site
RCRA
facility)
(capital)
$115,000
(annual O&M)
$1,170,919
(capital)
$6,000
(annual O&M)
$115,500
(capital)
$165,300
(annual O&M)
$1,883,261
( capi tal )
O&M (not
provided)
$1,954,000
(capital)
$118,000
(annual O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
en
Reoion
V
V
V
V
V
V
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedi al Acti on
Charlevoix, MI
09/30/85
2nd-Fi nal
Chem-Dyne, OH
07/05/85
Ist-Final
Coshocton
Landfill, OH
80-Acre
Municipal/
Industrial
Landfill
06/17/88
Ist-Final
Cross Brothers,
IL
03/25/85
IRM
Eau Claire, WI
06/10/85
IRM
Eau Claire, WI
Municipal Well
Fi el d
03/31/88
2nd-Fi nal
Threat/Problem
GW contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
and PCE
GW and soil
contaminated with
VOCs, organics
including PCBs, and
metal s
Sediments, GW, SW,
and leachate
contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
and toluene, organics
including PAHs and
PCP, and metals
including copper,
nickel , and zinc
Soil contaminated
with VOCs
GW contaminated with
VOCs including PCE
GW contaminated with
VOCs including PCE
and TCE
Waste Volume
Not
specified
Not
specified
Not
specified
Not
specified
11,200,000
gal /day
Not
specified
Components of
Selected Remedy
Plume discharge to Lake Michigan under
natural flow conditions; long-term plume
monitoring; and institutional controls on
private well installation
GW pump and treatment; demolition of onsite
buildings; removal of selected soil; and
RCRA capping
Implementation of institutional controls
including deed and access restrictions; site
grading; State solid waste landfill capping
followed by a topsoil cover and
revegetati on ; and GW, SW, and landfill gas
monitoring. Components to be evaluated
during design include landfill gas
collection and venting; and leachate and GW
collection, onsite storage, and onsite or
off site treatment
Excavation and offsite disposal of surficial
and buried waste materials, and visibly
contaminated soil
GW treatment using air stripping with
discharge to municipal water treatment plant
and distribution system
GW pump and treatment using the existing air
stripper with discharge to the municipal
water system; and provision of municipal
water to private well users
Cleanup Goals
Under natural flow
conditions, TCE and PCE will
meet 0.008 ug/1 and
0.01 ug/1, respectively
GW will be treated to
<100 ug/1 total VOCs to meet
background levels, or 10~°
cancer risk level
Contaminants which have
established MCLs were below
MCL levels. SW and sediment
chronic concentration values
for aquatic life were not
exceeded. State sanitary
landfill closure
requirements will be met to
manage the principle threat
of future releases from the
site
Not specified
Aeration treatment will
remove 99.6%
1,1-dichloroethene from GW
GW treatment will attain the
additive 10~° health-based
risk level at the potential
receptor, and meet MCLs for
TCE 5 ug/1 , DCE 7 ug/1 , and
chloroform 100 mg/1 , and
State WQC for PCE 1 ug/1
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$0
( capi tal )
$17,000
(annual O&M)
$11,600,000
(capital)
$597,000
(annual O&M)
$8,010,000
{ capi tal )
$96,000
(annual O&M)
$377,728
(capital)
$0
(O&M)
$1,420,000
(capital)
$195,000
(annual O&M)
$1,214,200
( capi tal )
$396,700
(annual O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
ro
Reaion
V
V
V
V
V
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Envirochem, IN
09/25/87
1st
Fields Brook, OH
09/30/86
1st
FMC, MN
09/30/87
Ist-Final
Forest Waste, MI
02/29/84
IRM
Forest Waste, MI
06/30/86
1st
Threat/Probl en
Soil, sediments, SW,
and GW contaminated
with VOCs, organics
including PCBs, and
inorganics
Brook sediments
contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
and PCE, organics
including PCBs, and
metal s
GW contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
Soil contaminated
with organics
including PCBs
Soils and sediments
contaminated with
organics and metals
Components of
Haste Volume Selected Remedy
4,200 yd3 Excavation, dewatering, and onsite disposal
of soils and sediments under a RCRA
multi-layer cap; re-routing of SW; GW
collection and treatment; and institutional
controls to include deed and access
restrictions
36,000 yd3 Excavation, solidification, and onsite
disposal of contaminated sediments
16,000 yd3 Excavation and thermal treatment of
contaminated sediments with onsite disposal
of residuals
Not GW extraction with discharge of untreated GW
specified to POTW; and institutional controls to
include land use restrictions to mitigate
against near-term contaminated GW usage
Not Fencing
specified
4,000 yd3 Excavation of sludges and sediments and
removal of aqueous lagoon wastes with
110,000 gals solidification and offsite RCRA disposal
Cleanuo Goals
GW will attain HCL values
which include benzene
5.0 ug/1, 1,1-DCE 7.0 ug/1,-
arsenic 50.0 ug/1, lead
50.0 ug/1, and TCE 200.0 ug/1
Sediments will be excavated
to a 10~" excess cancer
risk or to 50 mg/kg PCBs,
whichever is greater
GW treatment will attain a
10~° health-based risk
level and meet the MCLs for
1,2-DCA 5.0 ug/1, 1,1,1-TCA
200 ug/1, TCE 5.0 ug/1, PCE
10.0 ug/1, 1, 1-dichloro-
ethylene 7.0 ug/1, and
benzene 5.0 ug/1. Minnesota
Recommended Drinking Water
Limits will be met for
1,1,2-TCA 6.1 ug/1, 1,2-DCE
7.0 ug/1, toluene
2,000.0 ug/1, and xylene
440.0 ug/1
Not specified
Cleanup levels will achieve
an ingestion rate of
O.lg/day of soil for a 70 kg
adult
Present
Worth/
Capital and
OSM Costs
$33,900,000
(present
worth)
$35,100,000
(capital)
$72,000
(annual O&M)
$1,518,005
(present
worth)
$100,000
(capital)
$0
(O&M)
$1,295,000
( capi tal )
$0
(O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Reqi on
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Threat/Problem
Waste Volume
Components of
Selected Remedy
Cleanup Goals
Present
Worth/
Capi tal and
O&M Costs
ro
Forest Waste Soil and GW
Disposal, MI contaminated with
organics including
11-Acre PAHs and PBBs, VOCs
Industrial/Muni cip including TCE and
al Landfill toluene, and metals
including arsenic and
03/31/88 lead
2nd-Fi nal
Fort Wayne
Reduction, IN
15-Acre
Municipal
Landfill/Waste
Disposal Facility
08/26/88
Ist-Final
Soil and GW
contaminated with 43
indicator chemicals
including VOCs,
organics, and metals
IMC/Terre Haute,
IN
Industrial
Facility
06/22/88
Ist-Final
Industrial
Excess Landfill,
OH
09/30/87
1st
Soil contaminated
with BHC-tech and the
pesticide lindane
GW contaminated wth
VOCs, organics, and
inorganics
1,000 yd3
(soil)
4,000 drums
(liquid and
solid waste)
4,600 drums
(liquid
wastes)
28,500 yd3
Not
specified
Removal and offsite incineration of drums
and associated contaminated soil, followed
by installation of a containment system
around the landfill including a RCRA cap,
slurry wall, and a dewatering system with a
leachate collection, treatment and disposal
system; access and deed restrictions; and GW
monitoring
Municipal landfill: solid waste closure
capping; GW monitoring; and deed and access
restrictions. Waste disposal facility:
excavation, reconsolidation, and on- or
offsite incineration from Area C followed by
soil capping; GW collection and treatment,
if necessary; flood control measures; and
compensation for 0.3 acres of wetlands
through enhancement of remaining wetlands
No further action (because previous soil
cleanup has proven effective in containing
the source of contamination) with
implementation of a maintenance program; GW
monitoring; access restrictions; and
establishment of a contingency plan
Provisions of an alternate water supply to
approximately 100 homes
Remedy addresses control of
contamination, which will
ensure GW lifetime cancer
risk range of 10~4 to
10~. Cleanup goals for
individual chemicals were
not specified
Contaminant levels in the
area of the municipal
landfill do not pose a
threat to human health or
the environment. GW
monitoring will ensure
protection of the river
through the use of ACLs as a
performance standard.
Specific goals will be
determined during design.
MCLs are not ARAR since GW
is not used as a drinking
water source. The fate of
GW in the waste disposal
facility area will be
determined during design
Remedy addresses control of
contaminant migration, thus
individual goals are not
appl i cabl e
Chemical-specific cleanup
goals will be selected in
2nd O.U.
$23,820,000
(present
worth)
$440,500
(annual O&M)
$10,020,000
(present
worth)
$159,000
(present
worth O&M)
$1,715,870
$2,289,060
(present
worth)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
10
g
Reai on
V
V
V
V
V
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Johns-Manville,
IL
06/30/87
Ist-Final
Kummer Landfill ,
MN
06/12/85
1st
Kurraner Sanitary
Landfill, MN
35-Acre Landfill
09/30/88
2nd
Lake Sandy Jo, IN
09/26/86
Ist-Final
LaSalle
Electrical, IL
08/29/84
1st
Threat/Problem Waste Volume
Soil, SW, GH, and air Not
contaminated with specified
inorganics including
asbestos
GW contaminated with Not
VOCs specified
Soil and GW 1,300,000
contaminated with ycP (soil
VOCs including TCE, and waste
PCE, and benzene material)
SW, soils, and 2,500 yd3
sediments
contaminated with
VOCs, organics
including PAHs, and
metals
Off site soils 25,530 yd3
contaminated with
VOCs, and organics
including PCBs
Components of
Selected Reoedv
Grading and covering waste materials and
soil in inactive water disposal areas;
closure of asbestos pit cover; off site
disposal of asbestos-containing material
generated from reconstruction activities
following final closure of disposal pit in
FY89; and SW, GW, and air monitoring system
Provision for an alternate water supply
Consolidation of soil and other waste
material with site grading and construction
of a cap consisting of a gas control layer,
a low permeability layer (clay or synthetic
membrane), and a drainage layer, with soil
cover and vegetation; access and deed
restrictions; and GW and landfill gas
monitoring
Soil capping; alternate water supply; onsite
consolidation of sediments; and
institutional controls including deed
restrictions on aquifer usage
Excavation and onsite incineration of
off site soils
Cleanup Goals
All media will attain NESHAP
requirements for asbestos
Remedy will reduce cancer
threat to <10~° risk level
Remedy addresses control of
contaminant migration, thus
individual cleanup goals are
not applicable
Sediments with contaminants
above the 10"6 risk level
will be excavated and
consolidated
Excavation and incineration
of soils with greater than
5 mg/kg PCBs in the first 12
inches of soil, and greater
than 10 mg/kg in soils at
depths below 12 inches
Present
Worth/
Capital and
OSM Costs
$4,026,000
(capital)
$49,000
(annual OSM)
$1,624,850
(capital)
$28,440
(annual O&M)
Clay cap
$7,400,000 -
$12,500,000
( capi tal )
$35,000
(annual O&M)
or
syntheti c
membrane
$6,900,000 -
$11,200,000
( capi tal )
$33,000
(annual O&M)
$4,747,000
(capital)
$63,000
(annual O&M)
$26,400,000
(present
worth)
$0
(O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
(O
Reaion
V
V
V
V
V
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
LaSalle
Electrical
Utilities, IL
Industrial
Faci 1 i ty
03/30/88
2nd-Final
Laskin Poplar
Oil, OH
08/09/84
1st
Laskin Poplar
Oil, OH
09/30/87
2nd
LeHillier/Mankato,
MN
09/27/85
Ist-Final
Liquid Disposal ,
MI
09/30/87
Ist-Final
Threat/Problem
Soil , sediments, and
GW contaminated with
VOCs, and organics
including PCBs
SW and soil
contaminated with
VOCs, and organics
including PCBs and
PAHs
Soils, oil waste
water, and sludge
contaminated with
VOCs, organics
including PCBs and
PAHs, and inorganics
GW and soil
contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
Soil and GW
contaminated with
VOCs, organics
including PCBs, and
inorganics
Components of
Waste Volume Selected Remedy
25,500 yd^ Excavation and onsite incineration of
contaminated soil and sediments; flushing
and mechanical cleaning of sewer lines;
demolition and disposal of buildings; and GW
collection and treatment .
Not Incineration of contaminated waste oil; and
speci f i ed treatment of contami nated waste water
900,000 yd^ Onsite incineration of oils, sludges, and
soils with off site disposal of all
incinerator ash; off site treatment of waste
771,000 gals water; decontamination of water and scrubber
water; dismantling and off site disposal of
all tanks; crushing and incineration of pit
cinder block walls; and backfilling and/or
grading of all excavated areas
Not GW pump and treatment using air stripping;
specified extension of LeHillier water supply system
to affected areas; and abandonment of
contaminated wells
Not Onsite land disposal of all debris and
specified equipment; onsite solidification/fixation of
soil and waste; construction of a slurry
wall and impermeable cap containment system;
and GW pump and treatment using air
stripping and ion exchange with discharge to
SW
Cleanup Goals
GW will be treated to
achieve MCLs for VOCs. PCBs
>1 mg/1 will be treated.
Soi 1 wi 11 be excavated to
5 mg/kg in surface soils and
10 mg/kg at depths > one foot
Not specified
Selection of cleanup levels
are scheduled in FY88
The goal of plume extraction
and treatment is consistent
with the 10~° cancer risk
concentration for TCE
2.8 ug/1
Target cleanup levels (TCLs)
for soil and GW will be
based on 10~5 health-based
risk level . For
noncarcinogens in GW, MCLs
and health-based levels were
used as TCLs which include
barium 1000.0 ug/1, cadmium
10.0 ug/1, chloroform
0.1 ug/1, benzene 0.2 ug/1,
methyl ene chloride,
1.0 ug/1, and TCE 0.8 ug/1.
TCL soil cleanup goals
include TCE 77.0 ug/g, PCE
16.0 ug/g, benzo(a)pyrene
0.4 ug/g, PCBs 1.0 ug/g, and
lead 20.0 ug/g
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$34,495,180
(present
worth)
$64,000
(annual O&M)
$1,043,000
(capital
$0
(O&M)
$8,490,865
(capital)
$0
(O&M)
$800,000
(capital)
$70,000
(annual O&M)
$21,743,100
(capital)
$316,600
(present
worth O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Reoion Remedial Action
V Long Prairie, MN
Municipal Well
Field
06/27/88
Ist-Final
V Main Street, IN
M 08/02/85
o
1st
V Mari on-Bragg
Landfill, IN
09/30/87
Ist-Final
V Mason County
Landfill, MI
10-Acre Landfill
09/28/88
1st
V Me tamo ra
Landfill, MI
09/30/86
1st
Threat/Problem
Soil and GH
contaminated with
VOCs including PCE
and TCE
GW contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
and PCE
Soil, SW, and GW
contaminated with
VOCs, organics
including PAHs, and
inorganics
GW contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene, PCE, TCE,
and xylenes
GW and soil
contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
and PCE, and metals
Components of
Waste Volume Selected Reined v
7,000,000 GH pump and treatment using air stripping
gals with discharge to the river; and onsite soil
treatment using active venting
Not GW treatment using air stripping with
specified discharge to water treatment system and
drinking water distribution system
1,100,000 Regrading and capping of site; provision for
ycr maintaining flood control measures;
construction and maintenance of perimeter
fence; provision of three private use
drinking water wells; and additional GW
studies, as necessary
Not Construction of a RCRA cap over the
specified landfill; deed and access restrictions; and
GW monitoring
18,150 yd^ Excavation and off site thermal destruction
of wastes from areas 1 and 4
Cleanup Goals
Protection will be provided
corresponding to the lO"'
carcinogenic risk level.
Individual goals include
TCE 5 ug/1 (MCL), vinyl
chloride 0.15 ug/1 (State),
and DCE 70 ug/1 (State).
Currently, there are no MCLs
for PCE or DCE. AWQC will
be met by the discharge
limit for PCE 5 ug/1.
Following treatment, PCE in
soil will correspond to the
10~" carcinogenic risk
level of 1,400 ug/kg
The air stripping system is
designed to achieve a 99.1%
removal of TCE, 88.9%
removal of PCE, and 96.7%
removal of 1,1 -DCE
Selection of appropriate GW
cleanup levels deferred
until selection of GW
treatment O.U.
Remedy addresses control of
contaminant migration;
establishment of cleanup
goals for GW contamination
is deferred until a remedy
is selected for the GW
operable unit
GW and soil cleanup targets
will be established in the
FY88 RI/FS
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$2,000,000
(present
worth)
$390,000
(annual O&M
year 1)
$250,000
(annual O&M
years 2-5)
$1,106,000
(capital)
$158,000
(annual O&M)
$5,800,000
(capital)
$1,000,000
(present
worth O&M)
$2,800,000
(present
worth)
$1,000,000
(present
worth O&M)
$41,500,000
(present
worth)
$0
(O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Reai on
V
V
V
V
V
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Mid-State
Disposal
Landfill, WI
33-Acre
Industrial/
Municipal
Landfill
09/30/88
Ist-Final
Morris Arsenic,
MM
08/07/85
Ist-Final
New Brighton, MN
(Interim Water
Treatment)
06/24/83
IRM
New Brighton, MN
(Water Supply
System)
09/19/83
IRM
New Brighton, MN
(Water Supply
System)
08/02/84
IRM
Threat/Problem Waste Volume
Soil, GW, and SW Not
contaminated with specified
VOCs including
benzene, PCE and TCE,
and metals
None None
GW contaminated with Not
VOCs including TCE specified
GW contaminated with Not
VOCs including TCE specified
GW contaminated with Not
VOCs specified
,-
Components of
Selected Remedy
Installation of new soil/clay caps for
lagoon and landfill and in situ
solidification/stabilization of sludge and
landfill gas flaring, if necessary; site
monitoring that includes GW, SW, and
landfill gas monitoring; off site GW
monitoring; provision of an alternate water
supply for nearby residences; improvement of
SW drainage; leachate and ponded water
collection and off site treatment; access
restrictions; institutional controls;
No further action
Interim GW treatment using granular
activated carbon and air stripping
Extension of existing public water supply
system to affected residents
Extension of existing public water supply
system to replace contaminated municipal
system
Cleanup Goals
GW will gradually meet state
standards and 10~" cancer
risk levels for ingestion as
a result of natural
attenuation and a decrease
in leachate contamination.
Individual contaminant goals
were not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$16,000,000
(present
worth)
$220,000
(O&M)
(year 1),
$100,000
(O&M)
(years 2-30)
$0
$150,400
(capital)
$30,526
(annual O&M)
$217,958
(capital)
O&M (not
specified)
$142,090
( capi tal )
O&M (not
specified)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Swwary Table
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Region Remedial Action
V New Brighton/
Arden Hills/St.
Anthony, MN
06/30/86
4th
V New Brighton/
Arden Hills/St.
Anthony, MN
03/31/87
5th
V New Brighton/
(TCAAP), MN
fO
<3 09/25/87
3rd
V New Lyme
Landfill, OH
09/27/85
Ist-Final
V Ninth Avenue
Dump, IN
Waste Disposal
Area
09/30/88
1st
Threat/Problem
GH contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
and PCE, and organics
GW contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
and PCE
GW contaminated with
VOCs and metals
GW, soil, and
sediments
contaminated with
VOCs, organics, and
inorganics including
asbestos
GW contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene, toluene,
xylenes, organics
including PCBs,
metals, and cyanides
Waste Voluue
Not
specified
Not
specified
Not
specified
Not
specified
250,000 -
700,000 gal
(oil)
Components of
Selected Remedy
Provision of alternate water supply through
well construction
Construction of granular activated carbon
(GAC) water treatment facilities with
discharge to the municipal water treatment
plant; and construction of a pipeline from
wells to the treatment facilities
GW pump and treatment with air stripping and
onsite reinjection to aquifer
Capping; installation and operation of
extraction/containment wells to dewater
landfill and eliminate leachate; onsite GW
and leachate treatment using biological
disc, sodium hydroxide precipitation, and
granular activated carbon; onsite
consolidation of contaminated sediment; and
fencing
Extraction of oil and GW with diversion of
GW to a recharge system and oi.l to an onsite
storage tank; construction of a
soil-bentonite slurry wall which will
require filling 0.5-1.0 acre of wetlands;
and GW monitoring
Cleanup Goals
Not specified
GW treatment will attain the
MCL for TCE of 5.0 ug/1.
MCLs for other VOCs have not
been exceeded
GW cleanup goals will attain
10~6 health based levels.
Discharged water will, at a
minimum, meet MCL values
which include benzene 5.0
ug/1, toluene 2,000.0 ug/1,
TCE 5.0 ug/1, PCE 6.9 ug/1,
vinly chloride 2.0 ug/1,
xylene 440.0 ug/1, arsenic
50.0 ug/1, and chromium 50.0
ug/1
Not specified
Remediation invokes the
interim remedy waiver for
contaminant-specific ARARs;
however, GW treatment and
discharge will meet MCLs.
Individual MCL goals were
not provided
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$600,500
(capital)
$22,820
(annual O&M)
$1,100,500
(capital)
$160,770
(annual O&M)
$4,000,000
(capital)
$120,000
(annual O&M)
$10,798,000
(capital)
$44,000
(annual O&M)
$1,960,000
(capital)
$190,000
(annual O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
s
Reai on
V
V
V
V
V
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
NL/Taracorp/
Golden Auto
Parts, MN
Industrial
Faci 1 i ty/Lead
Smel ter
09/29/88
2nd-Fi nal
Northern
Engraving, WI
09/29/87
Ist-Final
Northernaire, MI
09/11/85
1st
Northside
Landfill, IN
09/25/87
1st
Novaco
Industries, MI
06/27/86
1st
Threat/Problem Waste Volume
None None
Soil, sludge, and GW 4,400 yd3
contaminated with
VOCs including TCE,
and inorganics
GW, soil, and sewer Not
sediments specified
contaminated with
metals including
chromium and cadmium
Soil, sediments, SW, 4,200 yd3
and GW contaminated
with VOCs including
TCE, organics
including PCBs, and
inorganics
GW contaminated with 36,000,000
metals including gals
chromium
Components of
Selected Remedy
No action remedy
Excavation and onsite solidification of
sludge and soil; installation of RCRA cap
atop lagoon; and institutional controls to
include deed and access restrictions to
seepage pit
Excavation and off site disposal of soil and
sewer line to privately-owned RCRA facility;
cleaning dust and hazardous residue from
building floor; breaking up of 300 ft2 of
floor and drywell, sampling soil,
excavation, and disposal of any contaminated
debris and soil at a RCRA Subtitle C
facility; and backfilling of area with clean
soil
Excavation, dewatering, and onsite disposal
of soils and sediments under a RCRA
multi -layer cap; re-routing of SW; GW and
leachate collection and treatment system;
and institutional controls to include deed
and access restrictions
GW pump and treatment using electrochemical
reduction, precipitation, filtration, and
ion exchange with discharge to creek; and GW
extraction from the sand/gravel aquifer
Cleanup Goals
No action attains the State
ARAR of 1,000 mg/kg for soil
lead, as well as the ATSDR
guidance level of 500 -
1,000 mg/kg
GW cleanup will be managed
through the use of ACLs that
are protective of the
river. ACLs include TCE
21,900.0 ug/1, copper 12.0
ug/1, nickel 160.0 ug/1, and
zinc 110.0 ug/1
Excavation of soils and
sediments will meet response
objectives of chromium
50 mg/kg and cadmium 10 mg/kg
GW will attain MCL values
which include benzene 5.0
ug/1, 1-1-DCE 7.0 ug/1,
arsenic 50.0 ug/1, lead 50.0
ug/1, and TCE 200.0 ug/1
Treatment will remove
hexavalent chromium from the
GW to concentrations below
50 ug/1 and t rival en t
chromium concentrations to
below 100 ug/1
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$0
$295,000
(capital)
$16,000
(annual O&M)
$75,000
(capital)
$0
(O&M)
$33,900,000
(present
worth)
$560,000
(capital)
$419,000
(annual O&M)
(years 1-6)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Suwnary Table
ro
2
Real on
V
V
V
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Oak Grove
Landfill, UN
45 to 50-Acre
Municipal
Landfill
09/30/88
1st
Old Mill, OH
08/07/85
Ist-Final
Outboard Marine
Corp., IL
,05/15/84
1st
Threat/Probl em
Soil, GW and SW
contaminated with
VOCs including
toluene and xylenes
GW and soil
contaminated with
VOCs and organics
including PCBs
GW, soil , and river
sediments
contaminated with
VOCs, and organics
including PCBs
Components of
Haste Volume Selected Remedy
Not Deed and access restrictions; capping with
specified low permeability layer, and top soil cover
and vegetation; and air and GW monitoring
Not Removal and off site disposal of 95 percent
specified of soil contaminants; GW extraction and
treatment using granular activated carbon;
aquifer use restrictions; and provision of
public water supply to residences
potentially affected
Not Excavation and off site disposal of PCB
specified contaminated materials; construction of
onsite containment cell for moderately
contaminated PCB material; capping; GW
diversion; construction of clay-lined
dewatering lagoon; and treatment of
supernatant with discharge to harbor
Cleanup Goals
Remedy addresses control of
contaminant migration, thus
individual cleanup goals are
not applicable
Soils contaminated with
base/neutral compounds will
be removed to background,
and VOC removal will be to
the 10~° cancer risk
1 evel . GW cl eanup has been
proposed to meet the 10~5
risk level
Not specified
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$6,400,000 to
11,100,000
(clay cap)
(present
worth)
or
$5,500,000 to
$9,300,000
(synthetic
membrane)
(present
worth)
$42,000
(clay cap)
(annual O&M)
or
$40,000
(synthetic
membrane)
(annual O&M)
$3,917,000
( capi tal )
$45,000
(annual O&M)
$21,570,000
(present
worth)
O&M (not
specified)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Region Remedial Action
Threat/Problem
Waste Volume
Components of
Selected Remedy
Cleanup Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
to
O)
en
V
Petersen Sand &
Gravel, IL
Mining and Waste
Disposal Area
09/14/88
Ist-Final
Poer Farm, IN
Industrial
Facility
09/29/88
Ist-Final
Pristine, OH
Waste Disposal
Facility
12/31/87
Ist-Final
Reilly Tar, MN
06/06/84
1st
Reilly Tar &
Chemi cal, MN
05/30/86
2nd
None
None
Soil, sediments, GW,
SW, and buildings
contaminated with
VOCs including PCE
and TCE, metals, and
pesticides (dioxin in
soils and sediments
only)
GW contaminated with
VOCs and organics
including PAHs
GW and soils
contaminated with
VOCs, and organics
including PAHs
Not
appli cable
Not
appli cable
37,700 yd3
Not
specified
800,000 -
1,000,000
yd3
No further action with SW and sediment
monitoring
Not applicable
No further action after abandoning GW
monitoring wells
Not applicable
Excavation, onsite consolidation; of 1,725
yd^ of sediments and soil; and in situ
vitrification of soil; installation of a
french drain; GW pump and treatment using
air stripping with off site discharge to Mill
Creek; decontamination of structures
followed by removal and disposal at a solid
waste landfill; implementation of
institutional controls including deed and
access restrictions; and GW monitoring
The overal1 health-based
cleanup standard of 10~°
cumulative excess cancer
risk at the plume boundary
will be met for all media.
Additionally, this remedy
will meet the MCL for lead
50 ug/1
GW treatment using granular activated carbon Not specified
GW pump and treatment; capping and filling
of exposed wastes; and discharge of
hazardous waste to sewer
Drinking water criteria for
PAHs were developed through
State and EPA consultations
$0
$0
$20,837,000
(capital)
$94,800
(annual O&M)
$750,000
(capital)
$188,000
(annual O&M)
Cost
estimates
not fully
developed
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Region
V
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Republic Steel
Quarry, OH
Industrial
Facility
Threat/Problem
Soil contaminated
with VOCs and metals
Haste Volume
100 yd3
(soil)
Components of
Selected Remedv
Excavation and off site disposal of
contaminated soil; and GW monitoring
Cleanup Goals
Soil treatment before
off site disposal to meet LDR
requirements is not expected
to be necessary. Individual
removal goals were not
specified
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$63,200
(present
worth)
09/30/88
Ist-Final
Rose Township, MI
09/30/87
Ist-Final
Soil and GW
contaminated with
VOCs, organics
including PCBs and
PAHs, and inorganics
Schmalz Dump, WI
08/13/85
1st
Schmalz Dump, WI
09/30/87
2nd-Final
Seymour, IN
09/30/86
1st
Soil contaminated
with VOCs, organics
including PCBs, and
metals including
chromium
Soil contaminated
with metals
GW and soil
contaminated with
VOCs, organics, and
metal s
50,000 yd3
3,500 yd3
Not
specified
101,690,000
gals
Excavation of soil and onsite thermal
destruction with disposal of ash as either
backfill or placement in an offsite RCRA
facility (if ash is EP toxic, Teachable lead
removal treatment will be required); GW pump
and treatment using chemical coagulation,
air stripping, and activated carbon
adsorption with discharge in appropriate
manner; and fencing
Excavation and offsite disposal of
contaminated building debris and sediments
with dewatering
Installation of a low permeability,
compacted earth material cap over
approximately seven acres of soil
GW extraction and treatment with discharge
to POTW
Cumulative soil cleanup will
attain 10~b cancer risk
level which includes arsenic
14.0 mg/kg, PCBs 10.0 mg/kg,
and lead 70.0 mg/kg. GW
levels will also attain the
10~° cancer risk level
which includes vinyl
chloride 0.015 ug/1, arsenic
50.0 ug/1, lead 50.0 ug/1,
chlorobenzene 60.0 ug/T
(proposed MCLG), benzene
0.133 ug/1, TCE 0.627 ug/1,
PCBs 0.002 ug/1, and
methylene chloride 0.919 ug/1
PCBs will be removed in the
dewatering process to below
0.5 ug/kg
Trivalent chromium does not
exceed the MCL (50.0 ug/1)
and lead was not reported
above detection units
Water discharge will conform
with POTW standards
$32,547,000
(capital)
$200,000
(annual O&M)
(years 1-10)
$70,000
(annual 0&M)
(years 10-30)
$2,088,300
(capi tal)
$0
(O&M)
$687,664
(capital)
$17,940
(annual O&M)
$300,000
(capi tal)
$100,000
(annual O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
to
Reaion
V
V
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Seymour
Recycling, IN
09/25/87
2nd-Final
South Andover, MN
Waste Disposal
Facility
03/30/88
Threat/Problem Waste Volume
Soil, sediments, and 3,000 yd3
GW contaminated with
VOCs including TCE,
and organics
GW contaminated with Not
VOCs including PCE, specified
TCE, and toluene, and
metals including
arsenic, cadmium, and
chromium
Components of
Selected Remedy
Implementation of a full scale soil vapor
extraction system; installation of a
multimedia cap; excavation of contaminated
sediments and consolidation of sediments
beneath cap; GW pump and treatment; and
institutional controls to include deed and
access restrictions with compliance point at
the edge of the cap
GW extraction; provision of an alternate
water supply to private well users; GW
monitoring; and implementation of well use
restrictions
Cleanup Goals
GW cleanup levels will
attain. a cumulative 10~5
to 10~° cancer risk
level. MCLs attributing to
this level include benzene
5.0 ug/1, chloroform 100.0
ug/1, 1,2-DCE 7.0 ug/1, TCE
5.0 ug/1, and vinyl chloride
2.0 ug/1. GW cleanup levels
for inorganics will meet
chronic health values
including lead, cadmium, and
barium 50.0 ug/1 each
Remediation is aimed at
controlling migration, not
restoring the aquifer to
drinking water standards,
thus no cleanup levels were
establ i shed
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$10,536,000
( capi tal )
$7,200,000
(present
worth O&M)
$760,000
(present
worth)
1st
Spiegel berg
Landfill, MI
09/30/86
1st
Summi t National,
OH
Waste Disposal
Facility
06/30/88
Ist-Final
GW and soils
contaminated with
VOCs, organics, and
metal s
Soils, sediments, GW
and SW contaminated
with VOCs including
benzene, toluene,
xylenes and TCE,
organics including
phenols, PAHs and
PCBs, and metals
including arsenic and
chromium
5,000 yd3 Excavation of waste materials with offsite
incineration of liquid paint sludges and
10,000 yd3 offsite disposal of solid paint sludges
30,500 yd3 Excavation and onsite incineration of soil,
(soil) sediments, and contents of buried drums and
tanks, with disposal of incinerator residues
1,500 yd3 in an onsite RCRA landfill; GW pump and
(sediment) treatment and onsite SW treatment using
precipitation, floccupation, coagulation,
80,000 gals oil and water separation, filtration, and
(drum carbon adsorption with discharge of treated
contents) water to downgradient SW; installation of
multilayered cap with grading and
1,000-7,500 revegetation, and construction of a slurry
gals (tank wall around site perimeter; dismantling and
contents) onsite disposal of onsite structures; access
and deed restrictions; GW and SW monitoring;
and residence relocation
Excavation of all materials $15,771,000
exceeding a 10~fe excess $18,395,000
cancer risk (capital)
$0 (O&M)
Soil cleanup goals will $25,000,000
attain a 2x10~5 cancer (present
risk level. Discharge worth)
levels for treated GW and SW
will meet Federal and/or $1,132,250
State water quality (annual O&M)
standards. Individual goals
for soil and GW contaminants
were not specified
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Reoion Remedial Action
Threat/Probl em
Waste Volume
Components of
Selected Remedy
Cleanup Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&H Costs
to
05
co
United Scrap
Lead, OH
Industrial
Facility
09/30/88
Ist-Final
U.S. Aviex, MI
Industrial
Facility
09/07/88
Ist-Final
Velsicol
Chemi cal
Corporation, IL
Waste Disposal
Facility
09/30/88
Ist-Final
Verona Well
Field, MI
05/01/84
IRM
Soil and sediments
contaminated with
arsenic and lead
Soil and GW
contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene, PCE, TCE,
toluene and xylenes
Soil, sediments, GW,
and SW contaminated
witn VOCs including
benzene, organics
including PAHs, and
pesticides
GW and air
contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
and PCE
46,600 yd3
(soil)
400 yd3
(sediment)
55,000 yd3
(battery
casings)
11,500 yd3
(soil)
87,900 yd3
(soil)
10,200 yd3
(sediments)
Not
specified
Excavation and treatment of battery casings
and contaminated soil by washing, with lead
recovery and offsite disposal or recycling
of casings, and replacement of residual
soils onsite; excavation and dewatering of
sediments onsite and disposal with soil;
construction of a soil cover, and
revegetation; decontamination of
contaminated buildings and debris with
off site disposal; installation of a new
residential well; deed restrictions;
drainage control; and GW and SW monitoring
Onsite soil will be treated using soil
flushing; GW pump and treatment (including
on- and offsite GW and fluids from the soil
flushing) using air stripping with discharge
to SW
Excavation of soil and sediments,
backfilling with clay, and revegetation;
construction of a diversion channel;
consolidation of all wastes onsite with
clean backfill of excavated areas and in
situ stabilization, followed by construction
of a RCRA cap; construction of a GW
collection drain with disposal via deep well
injection or treatment using granular
activated carbon before offsite discharge;
GW and surface monitoring; and deed
restrictions
Provision for new wells; implementation of
barrier system; treatment of purge water
using air stripping system; and treatment of
air emissions using activated carbon
adsorption
The target level for cleanup
of battery casings and
surficial soil is lead
500 mg/kg based on
guidelines from the Center
for Disease Control. Soils
deeper than one foot will be
cleaned to the EP toxicity
value for lead, 5 mg/1.
Sediments will be cleaned to
background lead levels
(68 mg/kg)
GW cleanup goals will meet
MCLs, proposed MCLGs, or
Federal or State water
quality criteria.
Individual goals include
benzene 5 ug/1 (MCL),
toluene 2,000 mg/1 (PMCLG),
xylene 440 ug/1 (PMCLG),
PCE 0.88 ug/1 (WQC), and
TCE 5 ug/1 (MCL)
GW cleanup will attain ACLs
including benzene 2,000
ug/1; CPAHs 0.031 ug/1;
noncarcinogenic PAHs 5.4
ug/1; and phenols 100 ug/1.
Soil and sediments will
achieve ACLs including
benzene 2 mg/kg; CPAHs
0.010 mg/kg; noncarcinogenic
PAHs 0.046 mg/kg and phenols
100 mg/kg
Not specified
$26,924,000
(present
worth)
$55,375
(annual O&H)
$3,024,100
(present
worth)
$9^081,000
(present
worth)
$1,796,000
(capi tal)
$470,000
(annual OSM)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Reaion Remedial Action
V Verona Well
Field, MI
08/12/85
n A
2nd
V Wauconda Sand &
Gravel , IL
09/30/85
1st
V Waste Disposal
Engineering, MN
ro
o> Waste Disposal
Area
12/31/87
Ist-Final
VI AT&SF (Clovis),
NM
Waste Disposal
Area
09/23/88
1 st-Fi nal
Threat/Problem
GW and soil
contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
and PCE
GW, SW, and soil
contaminated with
VOCs, organics
including PCBs, and
metal s
GW contaminated with
VOCs and organics;
landfill covered with
lime-sludge cap
Soil , sediments, GW,
and SW contaminated
with organics
including phenols,
inorganics, and
metals including
arsenic, chromium,
and lead
Waste Volume
Not
specified
Not
specified
Equivalent
of 60,000 -
100,000
barrels of
hazardous
waste within
2,500,000
ycP of
solid
waste
Not
specified
Components of
Selected Remedy
Soil treatment using enhanced
volatilization; and GW pump and treatment
using existing air stripper
Installation of leachate collection drains;
provision for leachate disposal at sewage
treatment plant or at an off site hazardous
waste treatment facility; regrading with
clean soil cover and revegetation of bare
and eroded areas; and fencing
Installation of a RCRA cap; GW pump and
treatment using carbon adsorption with
off site discharge to Coon Creek;
installation of a clay slurry wall;
implementation of institutional controls
including well use restrictions; and site
monitoring
Installation of SW run-on controls;
evaporation of lake water using a pump and
spray sprinkler system; excavation and
onsite biodegradation of evaporate and lake
sediments in an onsite treatment area; in
situ biodegradation of contaminated soil
underneath the lake sediments, followed by
excavation and placement of the treated soil
into the sediment treatment area; capping
the treatment area with PVC liner and
vegetated soil layer; grading and
revegetating the disturbed area; access
restrictions; and GW and treatment area
monitoring
Cleanup Goals
It is estimated that within
three years, GW
contamination will decrease
to 100 ug/1 VOCs
Not specified
The existing concentrations
of contaminants in Coon
Creek will be brought to
below the 10~6
health-based risk level and
other fresh water criteria
established under CWA. The
point of compliance will be
set at the landfill
boundary. SWDA standards
are not ARAR since
institutional controls will
prevent any potential use of
the contaminated GW. Also,
MCLs have not been
established for site
contami nants
Remedy is aimed at
preventing contamination of
the aquifer and will meet
all primary State and
Federal standards for
drinking water. Individual
cleanup levels were not
specified
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$1,660,000
( capi tal )
$90,000
(annual O&M)
(years 1-2)
$46,000
(annual O&M)
(years 3-30)
$1,600,000
(capital)
$50,000
(annual O&M)
$9,504,796
(capital)
$1,862,915
(present
worth O&M)
$2,840,000
(present
worth)
~
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Swmary Table
Reaion
VI
VI
VI
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Bailey Waste
Disposal, TX
Waste Disposal
Faci 1 i ty
06/28/88
Ist-Final
Bayou Bonfouca,
LA
08/15/85
1st
Bayou Bonfouca,
LA
03/31/87
2nd-Fina1
Threat/Probl e» Waste Volume
Soil and sediments 66,980 yd3
contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene, organics
including PAHs, and
metal s
GW, soil, and Not
sediments specified
contaminated with
creosote
Soil, sediments, and 71,500 yd3
potentially GW,
contaminated with
organics including
PAHs
Components of
Selected Remedy
Relocation, consolidation, and treatment of
contaminated sediments and wastes using a
solidification technique developed during
design followed by onsite disposal and
capping of the residual matrix
•'
Off site disposal of creosote waste
Excavation and onsite incineration of 51,500
yd3 of soil, sediment, and sludge with
.onsite disposal of ash and capping (20,000
yd3, 34 acres); and GW pump and treatment
using technologies to be evaluated during
design with reinjection
Cleanup Goals
Remediation will attain the
excess cancer risk level of
9x1 0~b for adults and
1.2xlO~5 for children. No
ARARs exist at this site for
contaminated soils and
sediments, so no
chemical -specific ARARs are
avai 1 abl e
Not specified
Soil /sediment contamination
> 1,300 mg/kg PAHs will be
treated. Soil /sediment
contamination >100 mg/kg
PAHs will be capped. GW
treatment will target the
TO"4 to 10~7 cancer risk
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$13,700,000
(present
worth)
$903,000
(capital)
$173,743
(annual O&M)
$59,594,534
( capi tal )
$173,748
(annual O&M)
VI
VI
Bayou Sorrel, LA
11/14/86
Ist-Final
Soil and GW
contaminated with
pesticides, VOCs,
organics, and
inorganics
Bi o-Ecology
Systems, TX
06/06/84
Ist-Final
Soil and SW
contaminated with
VOCs including TCE,
organics including
PCBs, and metals
36,400 yd3 Regrading with top soil; RCRA
georaembrane/clay capping of former disposal
areas; installation of sand/geofabric pore
water drainage layer; installation of a
venting system to reduce buildup of gases
beneath cap; installation of slurry wall;
consolidation of all miscellaneous wastes
for grading, fill or off site disposal;
fencing of all capped areas; and
construction of gravel access roads around
fenced areas
Not Construction of onsite disposal cell with
specified synthetic liner, leachate collection system,
and final cover; stabilization of waste and
onsite placement in cell; elevation of site
' above 100-year flood plain; and fencing
level (CWA suggests 3.1 ng/1
level for PAHs). Point of
compliance is facility
property line
Chemical-specif ic cleanup
levels not provided
$23,200,000
(capital)
$5,700,000
(present
worth O&M)
Not specified
$3,709,600
(capital)
$20,000
(annual O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Region
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Threat/Problem
Waste Volume
Components of
Selected Reined v
Cleanup Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
VI
VI
VI
VI
Brio Refining, TX
Industrial
Facility
03/31/88
Ist-Final
Soil, sludge, GW, and
debris contaminated
with VOCs and organics
Cecil Lindsey, AR None
04/23/86
Ist-Final
Cleve Reber, LA
03/31/87
1st
Soil, SW, GW, and
debris contaminated
with organics
Compass
Industries
Landfill, OK
09/29/87
Ist-Final
Soil and GW
contaminated with
organi cs and
inorganics
500,000 - Excavation of soil, pit contents, and
700,000 yd3 surface seeps followed by either
(soil) incineration (EPA preferred alternative) or
aqueous phase biological treatment (PRP
170,225 preferred alternative) with backfilling of
gals (tank treatment residuals; removal of offsite soil
liquids, contamination found during RI or RA;
and NAPLs) consolidation of onsite inert debris and
rubble with disposal to be determined during
1,757 drums design; removal, decontamination, and
(liquid and dismantling of tanks for future sale or
solid offsite disposal; regrading, placement of
wastes) topsoil, and revegetation; GW treatment of
channel and natural attenuation of aquifer;
implementation of institutional controls
including deed and access restrictions; and
GW, SW, and air monitoring
Not No further action with site access
specified restrictions and GW monitoring
6,400 drums Excavation and onsite incineration of buried
220,000 yd-3 drums and sludges; RCRA capping on land used
500,000 gals for disposal of industrial hazardous waste;
installation of gas venting pipes; drainage
and backfilling of onsite ponds; pond water
pump and treatment with discharge to SW; and
fencing
620,000 yd3 RCRA capping with site grading; SW
diversion; fencing with warning signs along
cap perimeter; and GW extraction and onsite
treatment in upper perched water-bearing zone
Media above Endangerment $23,308,000
Assessment action levels $23,333,000
will be treated to target (biological
levels based on a 10~" treatment)
incremental cancer risk for (present
carcinogens and on an worth)
acceptable chronic daily
intake for non-carcinogens. $22,458,000
Individual action and target $26,598,000
levels were not specified. (incinera-
Offsite soil contamination tion)
above unspecified background (present
levels will be removed. GW . worth)
in the channel will be
treated to a level
determined during design.
Since the GW may never be
used as a GW source,
immediate application of
MCLs is not appropriate
Not specified
Remediation will attain the
10~" cancer risk level
through CWA water quality
criteria. Specific cleanup
goals include
hexachlorobutadiene 0.45
ug/1, hexachlorobenzene 21.0
ng/1, and hexachloroethane
2.4 ug/1. Specific
excavation and treatment
levels not provided
GW solid effluent levels
will meet NPDES
requi rements. Other
chemical specific levels not
provided
$61,000
(capital)
$10,000
(annual O&M)
$25,000,000
(capital)
$100,000
(annual O&M)
$9,255,526
(capital)
$272,830
(annual O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Sumary Table
Region
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial-Action
Threat/Problem
Haste Volume
Components of
Selected Remedy
Cleanup Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
VI
VI
N>
VI
Crystal City
Airport, TX
09/29/87
Ist-Final
Dixie Oil, TX
Industrial
Faci1i ty
03/31/88
Ist-Final
French Limited,
TX
Industrial
Facility
03/24/88
Ist-Final
Soil and debris
contaminated with
pesticides and
i norgani cs
Soil, GW, and debris
contaminated with
VOCs, organics, and
metals including
copper
Soil, sludge, and GW
contaminated with
organics including
PCBs and PCP, VOCs,
and inorganics
including arsenic and
metals
12,000 yd3 Onsite consolidation of all materials which
exceed 100 ng/kg total pesticides; RCRA
capping over consolidation cell; and
disposal of decontamination liquids
107,351 yd3 Site controls including access and deed
restrictions; excavation and removal of
contaminated offsite soil; consolidation and
disposal of onsite debris and rubble;
remediation of Mud Gully; operation of the
wastewater treatment system followed by
dismantling and removal; dismantling,
removal, and disposal of tank contents and
drums and either selling or offsite disposal
of tanks; dismantling and disposal of all
process equipment; ambient air sampling and
air emissions controls; sampling and
monitoring of Mud Gully sediments and GW;
and site regrading and revegetation
70,100 yd3
(sludge/
sediments)
79,500 yd3
(soil)
In situ biological treatment; GW pump and
treatment; SW treatment; stabilization to
prevent leachate generation; backfilling of
lagoons with clean soil; and site monitoring
Soil cleanup will attain
10~° health based cancer
risk level for total
pesticides >100.0 mg/kg.
Debris cleanup will be based
on visible inspection
Endangerment Assessment (EA)
did not identify
contaminated soil above
unspecified EA action
levels; therefore, soil
treatment is not necessary
as long as site controls are
enforced. Offsite soil
contamination above
unspecified background
levels will be removed. Mud
Gully flood control ditch
and the bottleneck will be
remediated based on a
performance standard to be
set during design in
cooperation with the Harris
County Flood Control District
GW will be treated until the
point where the 10~° human
health criteria can be
achieved through natural
attenuation in 10 years or
less. Additionally,
remediation will be
consistent with WQC for GW
and SW, and TSCA regulations
and policy for cleanup of
PCBs and PCB-contaminated
material. Individual
cleanup goals were not
specified
$1,600,000
(present
worth)
$241,000
(present
worth)
$47,000,000
(present
worth)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Reaion Remedial Action
VI Geneva
Industries, TX
09/18/86
Ist-Final
VI Gurley Pit, AR
10/06/86
1st
10
••j
w
VI Gurley Pit, AR
Waste Disposal
Faci 1 i ty
09/26/88
2nd-Fi nal
VI Hardage/Criner,
OK
11/14/86
1st
VI Highlands Acid
Pit, TX
06/25/84
1st
Threat/Problem
GW and soils
contaminated with
VOCs including TCE,
and organi cs
including PAHs and
PCBs
Soil and sediments
contaminated wth
organi cs including
PCBs; pit
sludge/sediments
contaminated with
oily waste and metals
GW contaminated with
- metals
Soil , GW and debris
contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
and PCE, organi cs
including PCBs, and
inorganics
GW, soil, and sludge
contaminated with
VOCs, organics, and
metal s
Waste Volume
22,500 yd3
432,470 ft3
(soil,
sludge,
sediments)
4,100,000
gal s
Not
applicable
180,000 yd3
10,000 -
20,000
(drums)
Not
specified
Components of
Selected Remedy
Excavation and off site disposal of
contaminated soil and drums; capping; and GW
pump and treatment using carbon adsorption
with discharge to adjacent flood control
channel
Excavation and stabilization of sludge,
soil, and sediment with placement in onsite
RCRA landfill; removal of oil from water by
oil /water separation with incineration of
oil; treatment of pond water with discharge
to bayou; and removal of pond water solids
to be disposed with pit sludge
No action remedy (long-term GW monitoring as
part of a .previous source control design)
RCRA capping; installation of leachate
collection system; excavation of sludge,
drum mounds, and main pit; temporary capping
of former source areas (interim measures);
onsite or off site physiochemical treatment
.of inorganic liquids with discharge to POTW;
and treatment of solids by technology to be
identified during design. GW remediation to
be addressed in future O.U.
Excavation and off site disposal of waste
material; backfilling and seeding; and
f enci ng
Cleanup Goals
Soil will be excavated to
PCBs 100 mg/kg. GW will be
treated to below TCE 1 ug/1
Remedy meets RCRA, CAA,
NAAQ, and TSCA criteria for
PCBs. Specific levels were
not provided. Treated pond
water discharges comply with
NPDES permit requirements
Concentrations of metals
including arsenic, iron, and
manganese that exceeded MCLs
were not attri butabl e to
site contaminants, thus GW
cleanup goals are not
applicable for this site
Soil and GW cleanup levels
will be addressed in 2nd O.U.
Not specified
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$14,990,000
(capital)
$532,000
(annual O&M)
(years 1-2)
$483,000
(annual O&M)
(years 3-30)
$5,780,000
(capital)
$21,000
(annual O&M)
$0
$68,014,000
(capital)
$2,282,000
(present
worth O&M)
$2,407,000
(capital)
$14,100
(annual O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Sonnary Table
Region
VI
VI
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Highlands Acid
Pit, TX
06/26/87
Znd-Final
Industrial Waste
Control, AR
Threat/Proble*
Possible
contamination of SW
and GH with VOCs and
metals
Soil , sediments, and
GW contaminated with
VOCs including
Waste Volume
Not
appl i cabl e
Area C:
200 drums
(liquid
Components of
Selected Re»edv
No further action with SH and GH monitoring
Installation of a french drain with a
synthetic liner; excavation of Area D
liquid-filled drums with off site disposal;
Cleanup Goals
Contaminant concentration
levels meet HQC and HCL
requi rements
MCLs for arsenic, cadmium,
chromium, lead, and TCE are
relevant and appropriate GW
Present
Worth/
Capital and
OSH Costs
$4,700
(capital)
$11,120
(annual O&M)
(year 1)
$6,980
(annual O&M)
(years 2-30)
$11,400,000
(present
worth)
VI
Industrial
Landfill
06/28/88
1st
toluene, organics,
and metals including
arsenic, chromium,
and lead
Koppers
Texarkana, TX
Wood Preserving
Facility
09/23/88
1st
Soil, sediments, and
GW contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene, toluene, and
xylene, metals
including arsenic,
and organics
including PAHs and PCP
wastes) excavation and onsite stabilization of Area
C and D soils with onsite disposal of
164900 residual matrix in Area C; categorization
yd3 (soil) and disposal of solids and liquid wastes
resulting from previous investigations; GW
Area D: pump for offsite treatment, mix with
3,000 drums contaminated soil and stabilized onsite, or
(liquid treatment in an onsite facility with
wastes) discharge to be determined during design;
multilayer RCRA capping of area bound by
2,600 yd3 french drain and northern site border;
(soil) access and land use restrictions; and GW and
site monitoring
3,300 - Excavation of soil exceeding 100 mg/kg CPAHs
19,400 yd3 with backfilling using clean soil, grading,
(soil) placement of a sod cover, and washing
contaminated soil with disposal in an onsite
45,000,000 ' gravel pit or offsite hazardous waste
gals (GW) disposal facility; collection and treatment
of NAPLs at an onsite wastewater treatment
plant using oil/water separation followed by
either an activated carbon or fluidized
carbon bed system, and recycling or
incineration off site of NAPLs, with
reinjection of treated GW into the aquifer
with excess GW discharged to SW or to an
offsite treatment plant; excavation and
treatment of drainage ditch sediments in the
soil washing unit; deed and access
restrictions; and GW monitoring
cleanup standards; however,
the quantitative MCL goals
were not specified. GW
discharge and effluent
limitations will be
established by EPA and
ADPCE. The stab!ized matrix
will pass RCRA TCLP and/or
other EPA-approved leachate
test as well as the ASTM
strength test
The soil cleanup goal is
CPAHs TOO mg/kg,
corresponding to a 3x10"-3
risk factor. GW levels of
free phase cresote will be
remediated to a level of
non-detection, and NAPLs
will be removed to the
maximum extent practicable
$6,400,000
(present
worth)
$300,000
(annual O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Reoion Remedial Action
VI Mid-South, AR
11/14/86
1st
VI MOTCO, TX
03/15/85
1st
VI North Caval cade
Street, TX
to Wood Preserving
3| Facility
06/28/88
Ist-Final
VI Odessa Chromium
I, TX .
09/08/86
1st
VI Odessa Chromium
I, TX
Industrial Area
03/18/88
2nd-Final
Threat/Problem
Soil, sediments, SW,
and GW contaminated
with organ ics
including PAHs, and
inorganics
Soil and SW
contaminated with
organics including
PCBs
Soil, sediments, and
GW contaminated with
PAHs, and VOCs
including benzene,
toluene, and xylenes
GW contaminated with
metals including
chromium
GW contaminated with
metals including
chromium
Components of
Waste Volume Selected Reined v
45,750 yd3 Excavation of soil with consolidation and
capping; consolidation and stabilization of
oils, liquids, or sludge; RCRA capping;
backfilling, grading and seeding (or gravel
cover) of all excavated areas; fencing;
institutional controls to include deed
restrictions; and GW pump and treatment
using carbon filtration with discharge to SW
Not Off site biological treatment of contaminated
specified pit water; off site TSCA incineration of
organic liquids; and off site RCRA disposal
of sludges/tars and soils
22,300 yd3 In situ biological treatment of soil (method
(soil) will be selected after pilot testing);
onsite GW pump and treatment using oil/water
5,600,000 separation and carbon adsorption with
gals reinjection and, if necessary, discharge
into an onsite drainage ditch; and off site
incineration of all nonaqueous phase liquids
(NAPLs) separated from the GW
Not Negotiating agreements with Odessa City to
specified extend water supply; and construction of
water distribution system
Not GW pump and treatment using electrochemical
specified methods with reinjection; demolition and
disposal of building; and site monitoring
Cleanup Goals
Cleanup goals for all media
are based on Public Health
Evaluation levels or
concentrations that exceed
background levels. Specific
soil goals based on the
10-= health-based risk
level include total PAHs 3.0
mg/kg, arsenic 5.6 mg/kg,
and chromium 19.4 mg/kg
Not specified
Soil and GW cleanup levels
will attain a cumulative
10"15 cancer risk level.
Individual soil goals
include PAHs 1 mg/kg and
benzene 0.04 mg/kg.
Individual goals for GW
include benzene 5 ug/1
(MCL), toluene 2,000 ug/1,
and xyl ene 440 ug/1 .
Additionally, GW will be
treated until all NAPLs are
completely removed
Not specified
Treatment will eliminate
chromium > 0.05 mg/1 or the
MCL promulgated prior to
design
-
Present
Worth/
Capital and
0&M Costs
$3,500,000
(capital )
$153,500
(annual O&M)
$42,300,000
( capi tal )
O&M (not
specified)
$4,210,000
(present
worth)
$247,920
( capi tal )
$14,350
(annual O&M)
$2,836,000
(present
worth)
-j
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Suonary Table
S
Reai on
VI
VI
VI
VI
VI
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Odessa Chromium
II, TX
09/08/86
1st
Odessa Chromium
II, TX
Industrial Area
03/18/88
2nd-Final
Old Inger, LA
09/25/84
Ist-Final
Old Midland
Products, AR
Industrial
Faci 1 i ty
no /9/i/QQ
UO/ £H/ OO
1st— Final
Petro-Chemical
Systems, TX
03/27/87
1st
Threat/Problem
GW contaminated with
metals including
chromi urn
GW contaminated with
metals including
chromium
GW and soil
contaminated with
VOCs, pesticides, and
metal s
Soil, sediments,
sludge, and GW
contaminated with
organics including
PCP and PNAs
Soil contaminated
with VOCs, and
organics including
PAHs
Waste Volume
Not
specified
Not
specified
Not
specified
9,000 - ,
21,000 yd3
(soil)
850 yd3
(sediments)
450,000 gals
(GW)
620,000 gals
(lagoon
fluids)
4,000 yd3
Components of
Selected Reined v
Extension of municipal water service to
affected areas
GW pump and treatment using electrochemical
methods with reinjection; and site monitoring
Onsite land treatment of heavily
contaminated soil and sludges; onsite
containment and capping of slightly
contaminated soils; closing and sealing
ungrouted onsite well; GW pump and
treatment; and fluid treatment with off site
discharge
Onsite incineration of contaminated surface
soils, lagoon sludges and drainageway
sediments with onsite disposal of residual
ash; placement of a soil cover over ash and
revegetati on ; and lagoon and GW collection
and treatment using carbon adsorption
Excavation and temporary storage of soil in
an onsite RCRA facility; construction of a
road over excavated areas and existing
roadway to provide access to site area; and
temporary relocation of residents during
excavati on
Cleanuo Goals
Not specified
Treatment will eliminate
chromium > 0.05 mg/1 or the
MCL promulgated prior to
design
Not specified
Soils with >1 mg/kg PCP will
be excavated and incinerated
in accordance with State
standards. Soil will meet
the 10~° incremental
cancer ri sk 1 eve! . Treated
GW will attain two cleanup
levels: PCE 0.2 mg/1 (MCL)
and the 10~b increased
cancer risk for PNAs 28 ng/1
(WQC)
Soil will be excavated to
below PAHs 100.0 mg/kg or
total volatiles 100.0 mg/kg
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$476,570
(capital)
$51,375
(annual O&M)
$3,618,000
(present
worth)
$3,174,000
(capital)
$10,000
(annual O&M)
$12,000,000
(present
worth)
$1,232,785
( capi tal )
$4,750
(annual O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Reoion
VI
VI
VI
VI
VI
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Sand Springs
Petrochemical
Complex, OK
09/29/87
1st
Sands Springs, OK
Industrial
Faci 1 i ty
06/28/88
2nd— Fi nal
Sikes Disposal
Pits, TX
09/18/86
Ist-Final
Sol Lynn, TX
Industrial
Faci 1 i ty
03/25/88
1st
Sol Lynn, TX
Industrial
Facility
09/23/88
2nd-Final
Threat/Problem Waste Volume
Soil, surface 130,000 yd3
liquids, and sludges
contaminated with
VOCs, organics, and 715,000 gal
inorganics
Soil and GW minimally Not
contaminated with specified
VOCs including
benzene and TCE, and
metals including
arsenic, cadmium,
chromium, and lead
GW, soil, and SW 150,000 yd3
contaminated with
VOCs and organics
Soil contaminated 2,400 yd3
with PCBs
GW contaminatd with 12,000,000
VOCs including TCE gals (GW)
Components of
Selected Remedy
Solidification/stabilization of sludges with
containment in an onsite RCRA landfill; and
excavation with off site thermal destruction
of remaining sludges. Second O.U. will
address GW remediation
No action with long-term GW and SW
monitoring; and implementation of
institutional controls including site access
restrictions
Excavation and onsite incineration of
sludges and soils with onsite disposal of
residual ash; banning usage of onsite upper
aquifer during natural attenuation; and SW
treatment, as necessary, with discharge to
river
Excavation of soil with alkali metal
polyethylene glycolate (APEG) treatment and
backfilling
GW pump and treatment using air stripping,
and activated carbon before emission to the
air, if necessary, with discharge to a
sanitary sewer or reinjected into the
aquifer; and GW monitoring
Cleanup Goals
Chemical -specific cleanup
levels not provided
Nearby residential wells
have not been affected and
should not become affected
based on the direction of GW
flow, which is towards the
river. In a worst case
scenario, discharge from the
site to the river would be
4.6 times less than NPDES
regulatory standards
Soil and sludges will be
excavated to VOCs 10 mg/kg.
The upper aquifer will be
attenuated to 10~5 Human
Health Criteria
The soil will be treated to
attain the TSCA level for
PCBs 25 mg/kg
GW cleanup will meet the MCL
for TCE of 5 ug/1
Present
Worth/
Capital and
$37,453,050
(capital)
$15,000
(annual OSM)
$9,300
(capital)
$45,600
(annual O&M)
$102,217,000
(capital)
$41,000
(annual O&M)
$2,200,000
(present
worth)
$2,200,000
(present
worth)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Sunnary Table
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Components of
blem __ Waste Volume ; Selected Remedy
Cleanuo Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
VI
VI
VI
South Cavalcade
Street, TX
Wood Preserving
Facility
09/26/88
Ist-Final
Soil, sediments, and
GW contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene, toluene, and
xylenes, metals
including arsenic,
chromium, and lead,
and PAHs
South Valley, NM
03/22/85
IRM
South Valley
Edmunds Street
Ground Water, NM
Industrial Area
06/28/88
2nd
30,000 yd3
(soil)
50,000,000
gals (GW)
GW contaminated with
organi cs
GW contaminated with
VOCs including PCE
and TCE
Not
specified
Not
specified
Excavation and onsite soil washing of 19,500
yd3 of soil with replacement into
excavated area, capping, and wash water
treatment in GW treatment system; in situ
soil flushing of 10,500 yd6 of soil; GW
pump and treatment of 50,000,000 gallons
using physical/chemical separation, pressure
filtration, and carbon adsorption with
reinjection into the aquifer or, if
necessary, discharge to the onsite drainage
ditch which discharges to Hunting Bayou;
off site incineration or recycling of all
non-aqueous phase liquids (NAPLs) separated
out from the GW; GW monitoring; and deed
restrictions
Installation of a new water supply well
GW pump and treatment using air stripping
(packed column aeration) with reinjection to
the aquifer through 'infiltration galleries;
and GW and air monitoring
Soil cleanup will attain a
cumulative TO"5 cancer
risk level. Individual soil
cleanup goals include CPAHs
700 mg/kg and no leaching
potential. GW cleanup will
attain a cumulative 10"^
cancer risk level for
CPAHs. Other GW cleanup
levels will attain Federal
and State standards or
background. Individual
goals for GW include CPAHs
1 ng/1 (no detection),
benzene 5 ug/1 (MCL),
toluene 28 ug/1, xylene
440 ug/1, and arsenic,
chromium and lead 50 ug/1
(MCLs)
New water supply will meet
the 10~" cancer risk level
by attaining
1,1-dichloroethane 0.25
ug/1, trichloroethene 2.8
ug/1, and tetrachloroethene
0.9 ug/1
GW will be treated to meet
MCLs and New Mexico Water
Quality Control Commission
Regulations including PCE 20
ug/1 (NMWQCC) and TCE 5 ug/1
(MCL)
$13,000,000
(present
worth)
$775,000
(capi tal)
$12,000
(annual O&M)
$874,800
(present
worth)
$280,200
(present
worth O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Real on
VI
VI
VI
VI
VI
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
South Valley/
SJ-6, NM
Industrial Area
09/30/88
3rd
South Valley/
(PL-83), NM
Industrial Area
09/30/88
4th
Stewco, TX
Industrial
Facility
09/16/88
Ist-Final
Tar Creek, OK
06/06/84
Ist-Final
Triangle
Chemi cal , TX
06/11/85
Ist-Final
Threat/Problem
Well sediments and GW
contaminated with
VOCs including PCE
and TCE
Soi 1 and GW
contaminated with
VOCs including PCE,
organics and metals
No threat
GW, SW, and sediments
contaminated with
acidic waste water,
metals, and organics
Soi 1 contami nated
with VOCs
.,,.„, Components of
Jiaste Volume Selected Remedv
100 ft Cleaning (excavation of well sediment) and
(well sealing abandoned wells; GW monitoring; and
sediment) access restrictions
36,000 yd3 Soil vapor extration with carbon adsorption
(soil) treatment of effluent air; GW pump and
treatment using air stripping, carbon
adsorption, and chemical /physical treatment
(if necessary), with reinjection into the
aquifer; further sampling and definition of
soil and GW contamination; and GW monitoring
None No further action
Not Diversion and diking at two major inflow
specified areas; and plugging of 66 wells
Not •*• j Incineration and deep well injection of the
specified tank and drum contents; mechanical aeration
of contaminated soils; decontamination of
all onsite structures; and off site disposal
of trash and debris
Remedy addresses prevention
of contaminant dispersal,
thus individual cleanup
goals are not applicable.
EPA actions involving source
control and contaminant
plume remediation on
adjacent sites will reduce
the low concentrations to
below State health criteria
within 5 years. Federal
health criteria are already
being attained
Soil will be treated until
the vapor extraction system
ceases to extract VOCs; GW
cleanup will meet MCLs and
State WQC. Individual
contaminant goals were not
specified.
Not specified
Not specified
Soil will be aerated to
background levels
Present
Worth/
Capital and
A0M F*** i.
O&M Costs
$4,000,000
(present
worth)
$300,000
(annual O&M)
$1,820,000
(present
worth of
soi 1
remediation;
figures for
GW remedial
action not
provided)
$5,000
(capital -
for plugging
16 wells)
$4,000,000
- (capital)
$5,000
(annual O&M)
$385,000
(capital)
$500 (annual
O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Suuary Table
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
VI United Creosoting
Site, TX
09/30/86
1st
VI United Nuclear
Corporation, NM
Waste Disposal/
Mining Facility
09/30/88
1st
to
09
o
VII Aidex, IA
08/24/83
IRM
VII Aidex, IA
09/30/84
2nd-Fi nal
VII Arkansas City
Dump, KS
Industrial
Facility/
160— acre
Muni ci pal
Landfill
09/29/88
1st
Threat/Problem Waste Volume
Soils contaminated 84,000 yd3
with VOCs, organics
including PCP and
PAHs, and inorganics
including creosote
GW contaminated with Mot
radiological and specified
nonradiological
constituents
including arsenic,
cadmium, cobalt,
nickel , radium -
226/228, selenium,
and gross alpha
GW and soil Not
contaminated with specified
VOCs and pesticides
GW and soil Not
contaminated with specified
VOCs and pesticides
Sludge contaminated 1,300,000
with organics ft5
including PAHs, and (sludge)
sulfuric acid
Components of
Selectfltf Rpmedv
Demolition and purchasing of 6 hones with
provision for permanent relocation of
residents; onsite consolidation of surface
soil with temporary capping; excavation and
disposal of PAH contaminated soils at
appropriate facility or treatment, if
available; backfilling and covering; and
natural GW attenuation
Implementation of a GW monitoring program;
GW pump and treatment using existing or new
extraction wells to control and remove
tailings seepage with discharge to an
evaporation disposal system; and
implementation of a performance monitoring
and evaluation program
Off site disposal of bulk liquids and
semi -sol ids by deep well injection; and
onsite drainage control
Excavation and off site disposal of buried
wastes and contaminated soil; backfilling,
grading, and seeding of the site; expansion
of the monitoring well network and biannual
GW testing; and vacuuming and washing
interior surfaces, floors, and walls of the
onsite building
In situ neutralization of the acid sludge
waste, followed by construction of a soil
cover over the waste area; institutional
controls including deed restrictions; GW
monitoring; and completion of feasibility
study addressing the subsequent sediment and
GW operable unit
Cleanup
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Recrion
VII
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Big River Sand
Company, KS
Waste Disposal
Area
06/28/88
Ist-Final
,,,-., Components of
Threat/Problem Waste Volume Selected Remedv
Metals and VOCs Not No action remedy
present in soil and specified
GW do not pose a
significant health
f hroaf
UN I COIL
Metals in the soil and GW
are not outside the range of
metals found naturally
occurring in soil and GW.
Additionally, no MCLs are
being exceeded in onsite or
off site drinking water wells
Present
Worth/
Capital and
$5,800
(future cost
if sampling
conducted in
5 years)
VII
VII
VII
VII
Cherokee County/
Galena, KS
Mining District
12/21/87
1st
Conservation
Chemical, MO
09/30/87
Ist-Final
GW contami nated wi th
metals
Not
specified
Soil and GW
contaminated with
VOCs, organics,
pesticides, metals,
and inorganics
Not
speci fi ed
Deere, John GW contaminated with
Dubuque Works, IA VOCs including
benzene, PCE,
Industrial toluene, and TCE
Facility
09/29/88
Ist-Final
Not
specified
Des Moines TCE,
IA
07/21/86
1st
GW contaminated with
VOCs including TCE,
and organics
Not
speci fi ed
Provision of an alternate water supply to
residences, businesses, and farms; and
chlorination rehabilitation of two wells
Capping; GW pump and treatment; and
decontamination and destruction of onsite
structures
Extraction and offsite discharge of GW;
continue GW extraction and collection of
NAPLs from we] 1-3, with off site disposal of
NAPLs; provision of an alternate water
supply; deed restrictions; and
implementation of a contingency plan to
contain migration if plant shuts down
GW pump and treatment with discharge to SW
The goal of this remedial $5,300,000
action is to meet the (present
primary MCLs. The water worth)
will need no treatment other
than chlorination to achieve $100,000
these levels (annual O&M)
Cleanup goals are based On $8,626,000
10"° health-based risk (capital)
level targets. MCL levels
to be attained include $12,774,111
arsenic 50.0 ug/1, cadmium (present
10.0 ug/1, total chromium worth O&M)
50.0 ug/1, lead 50.0 ug/1,
TCE 5.0 ug/1, benzene 5.0
ug/1, vinyl chloride 2.0
ug/1, and chloroform 0.19
ug/1. AWQC cleanup 1evels
to be met include nickel
13.9 ug/1 and zinc 5,000.0
ug/1
Discharged GW will meet $5,151,800
NPDES guidelines. GW (present
treatment will meet MCLs and worth)
EPA Health Advisories, and
withdraw the maximum amount $276,600
of NAPLs. Individual (annual O&M)
cleanup goals were not
specified
Extraction and treatment $1,196,000
will continue until maximum (capital)
TCE concentration in
monitoring wells is 5 ug/1 $63,000
or less, for 4 consecutive (annual O&M)
months
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Suwary Table
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
VII Ellisville, MO
07/10/85
1st
VII Ellisville, MO
09/29/86
ro 2nd
03
to
VII Ful bright/Sac
River Landfill ,
MO
98 and 114-Acre
Muni ci pal
Landfills
09/30/88
Ist-Final
VII Hastings Ground
Water/Col orado
Avenue, NE
Industrial
Facility
09/28/88
1st
Threat/Problem Waste Volume
Soil and SW Not
contaminated with specified
VOCs, organics, and
pesticides
Soil contaminated Not
with VOCs, dioxins, specified
and metals
Soil, sediments, GW, Not
and SW contaminated specified
with low levels of
unspecified wastes
Soil contaminated 42,700 yd3
with VOCs including (soil)
TCE and PCE
Components of
Selected Remedy
Callahan Property; stabilization and
erosion control; removal and disposal of
plastic cover and cover's hold-down blocks;
removal and salvaging of the barbed-wire and
chain link fences; and gravel removal
Rosalie Property: excavation and off site
disposal of contaminated soil, drums, cans,
and other debris; and soil testing and
analysis
Excavation and onsite interim storage of
dioxin contaminated soil; and excavation,
transportation, and off site land disposal of
soils containing nondioxin waste
Removal and off site treatment or disposal of
drum and drum remnants east of Ful bright
Landfill; GW, SW, and leachate monitoring;
and deed restriction
In situ soil vapor extraction with activated
carbon treatment of extracted vapor, if
necessary; and soil, GW and air monitoring
Present
Worth/
Capital and
Cleanuo Goals O.&M Costs..
Not specified $12,000
(capital)
O&M (not
specified)
Not specified $52,000
(capital)
O&M (not
specified)
Not specified $20,200,000
(present
worth)
O&M (not
specified)
Not specified $246,600 -
$270,400
(present .
worth)
Remedy addresses control of $3,603,000
contaminant migration, thus (present
individual cleanup goals are worth)
not applicable
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Region Remedial Action
VII
VII
ro
eo
w
VII
VII
VII
Threat/Problem
Hastings Ground
Water/
FAR-MAR-CO, NE
Industrial
Facility
09/30/88
2nd
Midwest
Manufacturing/
North Farm, IA
Waste Disposal
Facility
09/30/88
1st
Soil contaminated
with carbon
tetrachloride and
ethylene dibromide
Waste Volume
33,800 yd3
(soil)
Components of
Selected Remedy
In situ soil vapor extraction with treatment
of extracted vapor using activated carbon,
if necessary; access restrictions; and soil,
air, and GW monitoring
Cleanup Goal s
Remedy addresses control of
contaminant migration, thus
individual cleanup goals are
not applicable
Present
Worth/
Capital and
fl&M Tnctc
$2,526,000
(present
worth)
Soil contaminated
with metals including
cadmium and cyanide
200 yd3
(soil)
Minker Stout/ Soil and sediments
Romaine Creek, MO contaminated with
pesticides including
TCDD
4,400 yd3
09/28/87
2nd
Minker Stout/
Stout, MO
09/28/87
3rd
Soil contaminated
with pesticides
including TCDD
Minker/Stout/ Soil contaminated
Romaine Creek, MO with dioxin
Residential Area
09/29/88
2nd
3,500 - „
5,700 yd3
12,000 yd3
(soil)
Excavation of contaminated soil with either
onsite or offsite stabilization, followed by
offsite disposal; and backfilling and
grading of the excavated area to support a
vegetative cover
Excavation and temporary storage of soil and
sediments in an onsite RCRA facility; and
backfilling of excavated areas with clean
soil
Excavation and temporatory storage of soil
in an onsite RCRA facility; backfilling of
excavated areas with clean soil; and
institutional controls to include site
assess restrictions
Excavation and offsite thermal treatment at
Times Beach facility of soil exceeding
20 ug/kg dioxin including soil in temporary
storage, with offsite residual disposal also
at Times Beach; and capping of areas
contaminated with dioxin not exceeding
20 ug/kg a
Soil cleanup will attain the
health-based action level
for cadmium of 13 mg/kg.
Soil will be stabilized to
the extent that the leachate
contaminant concentration,
as measured by the TCLP,
meets the Land Disposal
Regulations standards for
F006 nonwastewaters. These
standards are cadmium 0.006
mg/1, total chromium
5.2 mg/1, lead 0.51 mg/1,
nickel 0.32 mg/1, silver
0.072 mg/1
Soil and sediments will be
excavated to below TCDD 1.0
mg/kg. Excavation will not
continue beyond a depth of 4
feet or once bedrock is
reached
Soil will be excavated to
below TCDD 1.0 mg/kg.
Excavation will not continue
beyond a depth of 4 feet or
once bedrock is reached
Soil cleanup levels will
attain 1 ug/kg dioxin at the
surface arid 5-10 ug/kg
dioxin at a depth of one
foot or greater.
$140,000 -
$170,000
(present
worth)
$4,488,000
(present
worth)
$28,000
(annual O&M)
$5,817,000 -
7,018,000
(present
worth)
$6,000
(annual
O&M)
$48,800,000
(capi tal)
(includes
costs from
Times Beach
site)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Sumary Table
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
VII Shenandoah
Stables, MO
09/28/88
.
1st
Threat/Problem Waste Volume
Soil and structures 3,300 yd3
contaminated with (soil)
dioxins
Components of
Selected Remedy
Excavation of dioxin-contaminated soil with
backfilling of excavated areas, placement of
waste material in polypropylene bags, and
storage of bags in a RCRA-equivalent onsite
structure; and decontamination of onsite
structures
Cleanuo Goals
Soil cleanup will remove
surface soils exceeding a
dioxin concentration of
1 ug/kg until a residual
concentration of 5 to 10
ug/kg is reached or to a
maximum depth of 4 feet
based on health-based action
levels provided by ATSDR
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$3,936,500
(present
worth)
VII
VII
VII
VIII
Syntex Verona, MO Soil contaminated
with dioxin
Chemical Facility
05/05/88
1st
860 yd3
(soil)
Times Beach, MO
(Interim Storage
Facility)
01/13/84
1st
Times Beach, MO
Residential Area
09/29/88
2nd
Soil contaminated
with dioxin
Soil contaminated
with dioxin
Not
specified
13,600 yd3
(soil)
105,000 yd3
(debris)
Anaconda Air contaminated with Not
Smelter, MT metals including specified
arsenic, cadmium, and
Smelter Facility/ lead
160-Acre Mill
Creek Community
10/02/87
1st
Excavation and offsite thermal treatment of
all dioxin-contaminated soil exceeding
20 ug/kg, followed by offsite disposal of
residual ash; dismantling and
decontamination of contaminated equipment
with a series of solvents and aqueous
rinses; installation of a clay cap and
vegetative cover over the Trench Area; and
maintenance of vegetative cover over surface
soil containing more than 1 ug/kg dioxin
Transportation of highly contaminated soil
from other sites for storage in an onsite
interim storage facility (to be
constructed); and restoration of other sites
by excavation and temporary relocation of
affected residents
Demolition and onsite disposal of all
structures; excavation and thermal treatment
of dioxin-contaminated soil exceeding
20 ug/kg with onsite residual disposal;
capping of areas contaminated with dioxin
not exceeding 20 ug/kg; and construction of
a ring levee for flood protection of
temporary thermal treatment unit
Relocation of all remaining residents (8
homes) with temporary erosional
stabilization using a vegetative soil cover;
demolition, consolidation, and temporary
onsite storage of debris; implementation of
institutional controls including deed and
access restrictions; and site maintenance
Soil cleanup will attain the
site-specific action level
of 20 ug/kg
Not specified
Soil cleanup levels will
attain 1 ug/kg dioxin at the
surface and 5-10 ug/kg
dioxin at a depth of one
foot or greater.
Risk-based performance
goals for arsenic and
cadmium appear technically
unattainable and were less
than background levels.
Consequently, background
levels for arsenic
0.01 ug/m~ and cadmium
0.01 ug/m3 will be met.
The NAAQS for lead
1.5 ug/nr also will be met
$5,617,000
(present
worth)
$15,734,000
(capital)
0&M (not
specified)
$48,800,000
(capital)
(includes
costs from
Minker/
Strout
Romaine
Creek site)
$300,000
(present
worth)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
00
en
Reaion
VIII
VIII
VIII
VIII
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Broderick Wood
Products, CO
Wood Preserving
Faci 1 i ty
06/30/88
1st
California
Gulch, CO
Mining District
03/29/88
Ist-Final
Central City/
Clear Creek, CO
09/30/87
1st
Central City/
Clear Creek, CO
Mining District
03/31/88
2nd
Threat/Problem
Soil, sludge, oil,
and wastewater
contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene, organics
including PAHs, PCPs,
and dioxins, and
metals including
arsenic and lead
SW, sediments, and GW
contaminated with
metals including
cadmium, copper,
lead, and zinc
Possible
contamination of
sediments, and
downstream SW and GW
with inorganics
Soil and SW
contaminated with
metal s
Waste Volume
31,000 yd3
(soil)
3,000 gals
(oil)
3,600 yd3
(sludge)
560,000 gals
(wastewater)
210 tons
(waste
discharged
per year)
Not
specified
Not
specified
Components of
Selected Remedy
Implementation of site access restrictions;
excavation and onsite incineration of sludge
and oil with off site disposal of ash
residues; excavation of visibly contaminated
soils with either onsite incineration
(<2,500 yd:?) or onsite storage
(>2,500 ydd); wastewater filtering and
treatment using carbon adsorption with
onsite discharge or use in the incineration
process; and GW monitoring
Construction of surge ponds at Yak Tunnel
portal; construction of concrete plugs at
three tunnel locations; sealing of shafts
and drill holes; diversion of surface water
away from tunnel recharge areas and grouting
of highly fractured rock; implementation of
a monitoring network to detect leakage,
seeps, or GW migration; and installation of
pump and interim treatment should surface
seepage occur
Passive/active treatment system for acid
mine drainage discharge
Slope stabilization at Big Five Tunnel and
Gregory Incline; and runon controls at all
five tailings and waste rock piles
Cleanup Goals
Disposal of residue ash will
meet BOAT treatment
standards which include
napthalene 7.98 mg/kg,
phenanthrene 7.98 mg/kg,
pyrene 7.28 mg/kg, toluene
0.143 mg/kg, and xylenes
0.162 mg/kg. Wastewater
contaminants will be treated
to nondetectabl e levels to
compl y wi th State
standards. If these levels
cannot be met, State
standards will be waived and
contaminants will be treated
to MCLs
This operable unit invokes
an interim remedy waiver
Interim remedy. ARARs will
be determined in future O.U.
Final ARAR determinations
will be addressed in the
final operable unit
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$2,264,000 -
$3,603,200
(present
worth)
$11,982,770
(capital)
$460,307
(annual O&M)
$1,663,000
(capital)
$511,000
(annual O&M)
$1,049,600
(present
worth)
$20,992
(annual O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Sunwary Table
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action Threat/Problem
Haste Volume
Components of
Selected Remedy
Cleanup Goals
Present
Horth/
Capital and
O&H Costs
VIII
VIII
•to
n
o>
VIII
VIII
Soil contaminated
with radium and its
decay products
Denver Radium I
(12th & Quivas),
CO
09/29/87
4th
Denver Radium II Soil and debris
(llth &
Umatilla), CO
09/29/87
5th
Denver Radium
III (1,000 West
Louisiana), CO
09/30/87
6th
Denver Radium/
Card Property, CO
06/30/87
3rd
contaminated with
radium and its decay
products
Soil and debris
contaminated with
radium and its decay
products
Soil, sediment, and
debris contaminated
with radium and its
decay products
11,000 yd3 Placement of cap over open 7,600 yd3 of
soil contamination; excavation of
contaminated soil under several structures
with temporary onsite storage (3,400 ydj);
maintenance of cap and storage area until a
facility for permanent disposal becomes
available; and final off site disposal
15,400 yd3 Excavation of contaminated soil with
temporary onsite storage; decontamination of
11 ft2 of roof and placement in onsite
storage facility; maintenance of existing
cap and onsite land storage facility until a
facility for permanent disposal becomes
available (15,400 yd3); and final off site
disposal
Not Onsite temporary contaminment of
specified contaminated material followed by offsite
permanent disposal when available; cleanup
of the Creative Illumination property; and
dismantling of temporary storage facility
with offsite disposal; and final off site
disposal
4,000 yd3 Excavation .of 4,000 yd3 soil and sediment
with temporary onsite storage and final
offsite disposal; and decontamination and
dismantling of buildings with offsite
disposal .
Radiun-226 in land averaged $3,702,800
over 100 nr will not (present
exceed background level by" worth)
more than 5 pCi/g, averaged
over the first 15 cm of soil $290,000
and 15 pCi/g over 15 cm (present
thick layers of soil. Gamma worth O&M)
radiation in buildings not
to exceed background level
by 20uR/hr
Radium-226 in land averaged $4,230,300
over 100 nr will not (present
exceed background level by worth)
more than 5 pCi/g, averaged
over the first 15 cm of soil $194,700
and 15 pCi/g over 15 cm (present
thick layers of soil. Gamma worth O&M)
radiation in buildings not
to exceed background 1evel
by 20uR/hr
Radium-226 in land averaged $2,172,800
over 100 nr will not (capital)
exceed background level
averaged more than 5 pCi/g, $305,800
over the first 15 cm of soil (present
and 15 pCi/g over 15 cnr worth'O&M)
thi ck 1ayers of soi1. Gamma
radiation in buildings not
to exceed background level
by 20uR/hr
Radium-226 in land average ; $1,148,000
over 100 nr will not (present
exceed background level by worth)
more than 5 pCi/g, averaged
over the first 15 cm of soil $89,500
and 15 pCi/g over 15 cm (present
thick layers of soil. Gamma worth-O&M)
radiation in buildings not
to exceed background level
by 20uR/hr
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Region
VIII
VIII
VIII
VIII
VIII
VIII
VIII
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Denver Radium/
Open Space
Property, CO
09/29/87
7th
Denver Radium/
ROBCO, CO
09/30/86
2nd
Denver Radium
Site Streets, CO
03/24/86
1st .
Libby Ground
Water, MT
09/26/86
1st
Marshall
Landfill, CO
09/26/86
Ist-Final
Milltown, MT
04/14/84
1st
Milltown, MT
08/07/85
2nd
Threat/Problem
Soil contaminated
with radium and its
decay products
Soil and buildings
contaminated with
radium
Asphalt contaminated
with radium
Soil and GW
contaminated with
organics including
creosote, and
inorganics
GW and SW
contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
and PCE, organics,
and metals
GW and soil
contaminated with
metals including
arsenic
GW and soil
contaminated with
metals including
arsenic
Waste Volume
1,310 yd3
7,000 yd3
(soil)
o
200 yd3
(demolished
buildings)
38,500 yd3
Not
specified
Not
specified
Not
specified
Not
specified
Components of
Selected Remedy
Onsite temporary containment of 290 yd3
material followed by offsite permanent
disposal; removal of 1,020 yd3 of material
with placement in containers followed by
offsite disposal when available; and
dismantling of temporary storage facility
with offsite disposal
Excavation and offsite disposal of
contaminated soils and debris; or
Excavation, stabilization and temporary
onsite consolidation of contaminated soils
Temporary leaving of contaminated material
in place; institutional controls; and
routine maintenance
Alternate water supply; and controls
prohibiting well usage
Installation of a subsurface collection
system; GW treatment using sedimentation,
air stripping, and off-gas carbon
adsorption; regrading and revegetating; and
fencing
Construction of a new well and distribution
system; and flushing and testing residential
plumbing systems
Replacement of household water supply
appurtenances; and on-going testing of
residential plumbing systems
Cleanup Goals
Radium-226-in land averaged
over 100 nr will not
exceed backgroung level by
more than 5 pCi/g, averaged
over the first 15 cm of soil
and 15 pCi/g over 15 cm
thick layers of soil. Gamma
radiation in buildings not
to exceed background level
by 20uR/hr
Remedy meets standards for
"Remedial Action at Inactive
Uranium Processing Sites"
Remedy meets standards for
"Remedial Action at Inactive
Uranium Processing Sites"
Not specified
Contaminated water will be
treated to achieve removal
of benzene 0, TCE 0,
cadmi urn 0 . 6 mg/1 , and 1 ead
4 mg/1
GW will be treated to EPA
drinking water standards for
arsenic 0.050 mg/1
Not specified
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$955,400
(present
worth)
$1,912,400
(capital)
$6,000
(annual O&M)
$30,000
(capital)
Annual O&M
(variable)
PRP
responsibi-
lity
"j
$1,819,000
( capi tal )
$152,000
(annual O&M)
$262,714
(capital)
$4,238
(annual O&M)
Not
specified
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Sunrary Table
CO
co
Region
VIII
VIII
VIII
VIII
VIII
IX
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
North Dakota
Arseni c
Tri oxide, ND
09/26/86
Ist-Final
Rocky Mountain
Arsenal , CO
06/04/87
1st
Smuggl er
Mountain, CO
09/26/86
1st
Union Pacific
Railroad, WY
09/26/86
1st
Woodbury
Chemi cal , CO
07/19/85
1st
Celtor Chemical,
Works, CA
10/04/83
IRM
Threat/Problem
GW contaminated with
metals including
arsenic
GW contaminated with
VOCs including TCE,
and inorganics
.
GW and soil
contaminated with
metals including
cadmium and lead
GW and soil
contaminated with
organics including
PCBs and creosote,
and inorganics
GW, soil , and
sediments
contaminated with
pesticides, metals,
and organics
GW, SW, and soil
contaminated with
metals and mining
waste
Components of
Haste Volume Selected Remedy
Not Expansion and hook-up of homes to GH
specified treatment and distribution system; and
evaluation of possible institutional controls
Not Construction of granular activated carbon
specified (GAC) water treatment system and
regeneration of spent carbon at another
location; modification of GAC system, if
necessary, to include air stripping facility
to treat vinyl chloride; replacement of
existing well pumps and motors; installation
of transmission piping; and construction of
laboratory and office space
410,000 yd3 Excavation and permanent onsite RCRA
disposal of soils; soil capping; and
alternate water supply
Greater than Rechanneling of river; GW pump and treatment
700,000 yd3 with carbon adsorption with discharge to
river; and slurry wall barrier construction
Not Excavaton, off site transportation, and
specified incineration of highly contaminated rubble
and soil with disposal of residual ash; and
backfilling with clean soil, regrading, and
revegetati on
Not Off site transportation and disposal of
specified tailing piles and contaminated soil; and
conduct of RI/FS
Cleanup Goals
Water supplied for domestic
and agricultural purposes
will attain the MCL for
arsenic 25 ug/1
Treatment will attain the
MCLs which include
1,1-dichloroethylene 0.007
mg/1, TCE 0.005 mg/1, PCE
0.005 mg/1, TCA 0.200 mg/1,
trans-1,2 - dichloroethylene
0.005 mg/1, and vinyl
chloride 0.001 mg/1
Excavation and onsite
isolation of soil with lead
greater than 5,000 mg/kg.
Soils between 1,000-5,000
mg/kg will be covered with
6-12 inches of topsoil. GW
will be monitored to comply
with SDWA Standards
Not specified
Contaminated soils will be
treated to 3 mg/kg and
contaminated rubble to total
pesticides 100 mg/kg
Not specified
Present
Worth/
Capital and
Q«W Costs
$2,212,600
(capital)
$57,400
(annual O&M)
$8,869,000
$10,100,000
(with air
stripping)
(capital)
$372,000
(annual O&M)
$1,816,550
(capital)
$30,900
(annual O&M)
$7,000,000
(capital)
•t>b/,UUU
(annual O&M)
$2,450,000
( capi tal )
$21,000
(annual O&M)
$340,000
( capi tal )
O&M (not
specified)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Region Remedial Action
IX Celtor Chemical,
CA
09/30/85
Znd-Final
IX Del Norte, CA
09/30/85
Ist-Final
IX Indian Bend
Wash, AZ
Industrial/
Residential Area
w 09/21/88
CD
i 1st
IX Iron Mountain, CA
10/03/86
1st
IX Jibboom
Junkyard, CA
05/09/85
Ist-Final
IX Litchfield
Airport, AZ
09/29/87
1st
Threat/Probl em
SW and soil
contaminated with
metals including
cadmium and arsenic
GW and soil
contaminated with
VOCs, pesticides, and
metals including
chromium
GW contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
and PCE
SW runoff from
mountain contaminated
with acid mine
drainage consisting
of sulfuric acid and
metals; fish and
sediment are also
affected
Soil contaminated
with VOCs, metals
including lead, zinc,
and copper, and
organics including
PCBs
GW contaminated with
VOCs including TCE,
and inorganics
Waste Volume
Not
specified
700 yd3
Not
specified
2.5 acres
(to be
capped)
Not
specified
Not
specified
Components of
Selected Remedy
Excavation and RCRA off site disposal of
contaminated soils
Excavation and removal of soil; GW treatment
with discharge to POTW; and disposal of
chromium-rich waste brine to RCRA facility
GW pump and treatment using air stripping
(packed column aeration) with air emission
controls, followed by distribution of the
treated water to the municipal water system
Capping of selected cracked and caved
enl argement
Excavation and off site disposal of
contaminated soils
GW pump and treatment using air stripping
and granular activated carbon with
reinjection into aquifer
Cleanup Goals
Action levels for soil will
be based on National Water
Quality Criteria. SW and GW
will be based on MCLs or
DWRs. River criteria will
be based on standards for
the protection of aquatic
life
Cleanup levels will meet the
10~° cancer risk level and
MCLs under SDWA
GW cleanup will attain MCLs
and State action levels.
Individual goals include TCE
5 ug/1 (MCL), TCA 200 ug/1
(MCL), DCE 7 ug/1 (MCL), and
PCE 0.67 ug/1
Cleanup program will be
designed for Protection of
Aquatic Life for the "worst
case" condition of 1978
Soils containing lead above
500 mg/kg will be excavated
GW treatment will meet MCLs
which include 1,1-dichl-
oroethylene 7.0 ug/1, carbon
tetrachloride 5.0 ug/1,
chromium 50.0 ug/1, and
arsenic 50.0 ug/1.
Chloroform will meet the WQC
of 5.0 ug/1
Present
Worth/
Capital and
0&M Costs _
$3,065,338
(capital)
$7,000
(annual O&M)
$1,240,000
(capital)
$0
(O&M)
$8,728,000
(present
worth)
$520,000
(annual O&M)
$68,100,000
(fund-
balanced
cost)
(capital)
$4,100,000
(present
worth O&M)
$1,460,000
( capi tal )
O&M (not
specified)
$2,358,500
(capital)
$800,200
(annual O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Region Remedial Action
IX Lorentz Barrel
and Drum, CA
Waste Disposal
Facility
09/25/88
1st
IX McColl Site, CA
04/11/84
1st
IX MGM Brakes, CA
Jg Industrial
o Faci 1 i ty
09/29/88
Ist-Final
IX Motorola 52nd
Street, Facility
AZ
Industrial
Facility
09/30/88
1st ;
IX Mountain
View/Globe, AZ
06/02/83
Ist-Final
Threat/Probl em Waste Volume
GH contaminated with Not
VOCs including specified
benzene, PCE, and
TCE, and other
organics including
PCBs and pesticides,
and metals including
arsenic
Soil contaminated Not
with VOCs and specified
inorganics including
sulfur dioxide,
hydrogen sulfide, and
arsenic
Soil, sediments, GW, 13,510 yd3
SW, air, and debris
contaminated with
PCBs and VOCs
Soil and GW Not
contaminated with specified
VOCs including
1,1,1-TCA, and metals
Soil contaminated Not
with asbestos specified
Components of
Selected Reoedv
GW pump and treatment using an ozone/UV
treatment system, and on exchange, if
necessary, with discharge to a local creek
Excavation and off site disposal of wastes
and soil
Dismantling of the process building;
crushing and removal of concrete slab, and
excavation of soil and sediments
contaminated with PCBs at concentrations
equal to or greater than 10 mg/kg with
off site disposal, followed by backfilling,
regrading and revegatati on ; GW pump and
treatment with discharge to a POTW; off site
GW and soil monitoring to determine extent
of VOC contamination; and additional
remedial measures for GW, if necessary
Soil -gas extraction and treatment onsite; GW
pump and treatment of. on- and off site GW
with treatment onsite and treated GW used in
site manufacturing processes
Permanent relocation of residents; onsite
burial of containerized mobile homes; and
fencing
Cleanup Goals
GW cleanup levels will meet
MCLs and NPDES discharge
limits. Individual goals
include benzene 5 ug/1
(MCL), PCE 5 ug/1 (NPDES),
and arsenic 0.23 ug/1. PCBs
and pesticides will be
removed to detection limits
Not specified
Soil cleanup level is 10
mg/kg for PCBs based on
EPA's National PCB Spill
Cleanup Policy. GW cleanup
will ensure a 10~° risk
level at the site boundary
GW cleanup will meet
relevant State/Federal
standards and control
contaminant migration.
Individual cleanup goals
were not provided
Not specified
Present
Worth/
Capital and
OSH Costs
$3,238,000
(present
worth)
$198,000
(annual O&M)
$21,500,000
(capital)
$0
(O&M)
$5,369,300
(capital)
$0
(O&M)
$7,600,000
(present
worth)
$700,000
(annual O&M)
$4,432,000
( capi tal )
$0
(O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
ro
co
Recrion
IX
IX
IX
IX
IX
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Operating
Industries, CA
07/31/87
1st
Operati ng
Industries, CA
190-Acre
Municipal
1 anHf-m
LailUTl 1 1
1 1 /1fi/fl7
I 1 / 1 O/O/
1 J
2nd
Operati ng
Industries, CA
190-Acre
Municipal
Landfill
09/30/88
?v«rl
oro
Ordot Landfill,
Guam
47-Acre
Municipal
Landfill
09/28/88
Ist-Final
San Fernando
Valley, CA
09/24/87
1st
1 O 1*
Threat/Problem Waste Volume
Leachate contami nated Not
with VOCs including specified
TCE
Leachate contaminated Not
with VOCs and organics specified
Air contaminated with Not
methane and VOCs specified
including benzene,
PCE, TCE, and toluene
Not applicable None
Area-wide GW Not
contaminated with specified
VOCs including TCE
and PCE
Components of
Selected Remedy
Site control (operation and maintenance of
existing systems) to include gas well probes
and leachate pumping and collection
Onsite treatment of leachate and other
collected hazardous liquids using air
stripping and carbon, adsorption with
discharge to the sewer system; and
construction of a treatment facility
Installation of new and use of existing. LFG
extraction wells; installation of new
integrated perimeter and interior LFG
headers; installation of multiple completion
monitoring wells at the property boundary;
installation of LFG destruction facilities;
installation of above grade condensate pumps
to collect condensate from gas headers,
leachate pumps in gas wells and abovegrade
leachate sumps with pretreatment of
collected leachate and condensate to POTW
requi rements
No action remedy with continued site
monitoring
GW pump and treatment using aeration and
granular activated carbon-air filtering
units with discharge to pumping station for
chlori nation and distribution; and disposal
or regeneration of spent carbon
Cleanup Goals
Interim Remedy. ARARs will
be determined in future O.U.
Leachate will be treated to
achieve the LASCD discharge
requi rements . Indi vi dual
effluent discharge limits
include vinyl chloride
0.013 mg/1, oil and grease
10 mg/1, and total toxic
organics 1.0 mg/1. The site
will achieve the 10~°
health-based risk level
Remedy will attain the State
ambient air quality standard
for vinyl chloride of 10 ppb
for a 24-hour period.
Additional goals include
carbon monoxide 2,000 ppm,
sulfin dioxide 500 ppm, and
methane concentrations to
less than 5 percent of the
landfill boundary
Not applicable
GW treatment will meet the
MCL for TCE 5.0 ug/1 and the
State Action level for PCE
4.0 ug/1
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$5,100,000
(present
worth)
$1,900,000
(capital)
$700,000
(annual OSM)
$73,000,000
(present
worth)
$2,340,000
(annual O&M)
$0
$2,192,895
(capital)
$2,284,105
(present
worth O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Suraary Table
Reaion
IX
IX
IX
IX
IX
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
San Gabriel /Area
I, CA
05/11/84
IRM
San Gabriel, CA
09/30/87
1st
San Gabriel
Val 1 ey Areas 1 ,
2, and 4
Pri vate
Utility's Well
Field
09/29/88
2nd
Selma Pressure
Treating
Company, CA
Industrial
Faci 1 i ty
09/24/88
Ist-Final
South Bay
Asbestos, CA
Residential Area
Levee
09/29/88
Ist-Final
Threat/Probl en
GH contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
and PCE
GH contaminated with
VOCs including PCE
GW contaminated with
VOCs including PCE
and TCE
Soil and GW
contaminated with
organics including
dioxin/furan and
phenols, and metals
including arsenic
chromium
Levee soil
contaminated with
asbestos
Waste Volume
Not
specified
Not
specified
Not
specified
16,100 yd3
2,700,000
gals
Not
specified
Components of
Selected Reined v
GW pump and treatment using air stripping;
and conduct of RI/FS
Well discharge treatment using activated
carbon adsorption; and alternate water supply
Onsite GW pump and treatment using an air
stripping system equipped with air emissions
controls, with residual discharge to the
utility's water distribution system;
floodproofing treatment facility; and GW
monitoring
GW pump and treatment using precipitation,
coagulation, and flocoulation with
reinjection to the aquifer or off site
discharge; soil excavation, fixation, and
replacement into excavated areas followed by
construction of a RCRA cap; GW and soil
monitoring; and access and land use
restrictions and institutional controls on
GW use
Stripping and rough grading of levee
followed by soil cover and revegetati on ;
implementation of erosion control measures;
and deed restrictions
Cleanup Goals
Not specified
Cleanup goals will reduce
PCE below the detection
limit of 1.0 ug/1 for
purgable halocarbons
GW treatment will attain a
cumulative 10~° cancer
risk level and meet MCLs for
TCE 5 ug/1 and DCE 7 ug/1 ,
and State action levels.
This will be attained by
remediating PCE to below 1.0
ug/1
Soil cleanup will meet the
risk-based levels of
dioxin/furan 1.0 ug/kg and
arsenic 50 mg/kg. GW
cleanup will meet the State
MCL for chromium of 50 ug/1
No specific goals specified
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$525,000
(capital)
$38,000
(annual O&M)
$1,616,000 -
$1,771,800
(capital)
$181,400 -
$303,100
(annual O&M)
$13,052,000
(present
worth)
$7,623,000
(present
worth O&M)
$11,280,00
(present
worth)
$1,300,000
(annual O&M)
$2,374,700
(present
worth)
$19,000
(O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Region Remedial Action
IX Stringfellow
Acid Pits, CA
07/22/83
IRM
IX StringfeTlow
Acid Pits, CA
07/17/84
1st
IX Stringfellow
Acid Pits, CA
06/25/87
2nd
ro
(O
CO
IX Taputimu Farm/
Insular
Territories, AS
12/27/83
Ist-Final
IX .Tucson
International
Airport Area, AZ
Industrial
Area/Landfill
08/22/88
1st
X Colbert
Landfill, WA
09/29/87
Ist-Final
Threat/Problem
GW, SW, and soil
contaminated with
metals and organics
GW contaminated with
pesticides, metals,
and organics
GW contaminated with
VOCs including TCE,
organics, inorganics,
and metals
Air contaminated with
VOCs, and organics
including PCBs and
pesticides
GW contaminated with
VOCs including TCE,
benzene, and xylenes
GW contaminated with
VOCs, including TCE
and PCE
Waste Volume
Not
specified
Not
specified
Not
specified
Not
specified
Not
specified
Not
specified
Components of
Selected Remedv
Fencing; cap maintenance; and off site
leachate disposal
GW pump and treatment with off site discharge
to POTW
GW pump and treatment with possible
discharge to POTW; and SW
diversion/collection with discharge to creek
Repacking of chemical /pesticide materials.
stored onsite; decontamination and sealing
of onsite storage facilities; and
transportation of all waste materials to
mainland for off site disposal
GW pump and treatment of areas A and B using
air stripping with treatment of emissions by
GAC, if necessary, and discharge to the
municipal water distribution system
Installation and operation of interception
and extraction wells with onsite GW
treatment; and provision of an alternate
water supply
Cleanup Goals
Not specified
Not specified
GW treatment will meet SAWPA
limitations for discharge of
arsenic 2.0 mg/1, cadmium
0.064 mg/1, chromium 2.0
mg/1, lead 0.58 mg/1, total
toxic organics (excluding
PCBs and pesticides) 0.58
mg/1, and PCBs and
pesticides 0.02 mg/1
Not specified
GW cleanup levels will
attain an overall excess
cancer risk level of 10~"
by remediating TCE to 1.5
ug/1 , thereby reducing the
levels of other contaminants
below their respective MCLs,
State Action Levels, and
10~" excess cancer risk
concentrations
Cleanup goals based on MCLS
include TCA 200.0 mg/1, DCE
7.0 ug/1, TCE 5.0 ug/1, and
OCA 4,050.0 ug/1. Methyl ene
chloride 2.5 ug/1 and PCE
0.7^ug/l are based on the
10~° cancer risk level
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs _
$2,406,000
(present
worth)
O&M (not
specified)
$9,189,000
(capital)
$1,724,000
(annual O&M)
$1,047,000 -
$1,136,000
(capital)
$1,243,000 -
$1,408,000
(annual O&M)
$0
$7,328,000 -
$7,820,000
(present
worth)
$393,000 -
$450,900
(annual O&M)
$24,000,000
(present
worth)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Recrion
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Threat/Probl em
Waste Volume
Components of
Selected Reined v
Cleanup Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
IO v
co X
Commencement Bay
(Near Shore), WA
-Industrial Area
12/30/87
1st
Commencement
Bay/Tacoma, WA
190-Acre
Industrial/
Municipal
Landfill
03/31/88
Ist-Final
Frontier Hard
Chrome, WA
Industrial
Facility
12/30/87
1st
Soil and SW
contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene, organics
including PAHs and
PCBs, and metals
including lead
45,000 yd3
Soil and GW
contaminated with
VOCs including
benzene, toluene and
xylenes, organics and
metals including
chromi urn
Soil and structures
contaminated with
metals including
chromium
Not
specified
7,400 yd3
(soil)
Excavation and stabilization of soils
exceeding one percent total PAHs; excavation
and stabilization of all surface soils
exceeding 10~" lifetime cancer risk;
removal and stabilization of ponded water;
onsite disposal of treatment residuals;
asphalt capping of stabilized matrix; SW
diversion; GW monitoring; and implementation
of institutional controls including land and
water use restrictions
Installation of landfill cap with gas
extraction system; GW pump and treatment
with offsite discharge to a creek or the
sanitary sewer; installation of alternate
water supply if needed; and GW monitoring
Excavation of soil and onsite treatment
using chemical stabilization with
replacement of,the treated materials;
demolition of site .buildings; and placement
of a final site cover
Surface soil and sediments $3,400,000
exceeding the 10~b health- (present
based risk level will be worth)
treated. Individual goals
include PCB 1 mg/kg, PAHs
1 mg/kg, benzene 56 mg/kg,
and lead 166 mg/kg
(acceptable dose). GW
cleanup will attain lead
50 mg/1 (MCL), benzene 0.53
mg/1 (WQC), PCBs 0.2 mg/1
(WQC), and PAHs 5-30 ug/1
(WQC)
GW cleanup levels were $21,015,000
provided for 10 contaminants -
of concern based on MCLs, $23,418,000
WQC, pretreatment standards, (present
or risk assessments. worth)
Individual goals include
benzene 5 ug/1 (MCL),
toluene 14 ug/1 (WQC), and
xylenes 10 ug/1 (risk
assessment)
Soils with chromium in $2,000,000
excess of 550 mg/kg will be (present
treated. There is presently worth)
no soil standard for
chromium. Testing
determined that soils
< 500 mg/kg would not
release chromium to the GW
at levels above the drinking
water standard of 0.05 mg/1
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Sunmary Table
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Region Remedial Action
Threat/Problem
Waste Volume
Components of
Selected Remedy
Cleanup Goals
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs .
to
to
en
Frontier Hard
Chrome, WA
Industrial
Facility
07/05/88
Znd-Final
GW contaminated with
VOCs including TCE,
and metals including
chromium
Gould, OR
Smelter Facility
03/31/88
1st
Soil and sediments
contaminated with
metals including lead
Martin Marietta,
OR
Industrial
Facility
09/29/88
Ist-Final
Soil, GW, and debris
contaminated with
asbestos, VOCs
including TCE,
organics including
PAHs, and inorganics
including arsenic,
and cyanide
45,000 ft2
(plume area)
80,800 yd3
(battery
casings)
3,370 ydd
(surface
soil)
13,650 yd3
(subsurface
soil)
5,500 yd3
(sediments)
6,000 yd3
(matte)
64,870 yd3
GW pump and treatment using selective media
ion exchange to remove chromium followed by
carbon adsorption to remove VOCs with
discharge into the river or city sewer
system; and implementation of institutional
controls to restrict GW usage and to control
new well drilling
Excavation and separation of battery casing
fragments and matte with recycling of those
components that can be recycled, offsite
RCRA landfill disposal for nonrecyclable
components, and onsite disposal of
nonhazardous, nonrecyclable components;
excavation, fixation/stabilization and
onsite disposal of contaminated soil,
sediments, and matte followed by soil
capping, revegetation, and site grading; and
GW, SW, and air monitoring
Consolidation of cathode waste material into
existing landfill, followed by capping of
the landfill; placement of a soil cover over
scrubber/sludge ponds; plugging and
abandoning production wells and connecting
users to the municipal water supply system;
collection and treatment of leachate,
perched water, and GW using an onsite
aqueous treatment (oxidation and
precipitation) with onsite discharge to a
recycling pond; GW monitoring; and
implementation of institutional controls
The remedy prevents public
exposure to drinking water
which exceeds MCLs for
chromium 0.050 mg/1, TCE
0.005 mg/1, and
1,1,1-tri chloroethane
0.2 mg/1. Additionally,
treated GW will meet NPDES
requirements, EPA WQC for
protection of freshwater
aquatic life, or city
pretreatment requi rements
(depending on remedial
action determinations for
discharge)
EP Toxicity Standards for
lead, cadmium, chromium, and
zinc (values not specified)
will determine disposal of
nonrecyclable waste.
Additionally, the NAAQs for
lead 1.5 ug/m3 (arithmetic
average concentration of all
samples collected during any
one calendar quarter period)
will be met
Soil cleanup goals include
arsenic 65 mg/kg based on
carcinogenic risk and PAHs
175 mg/kg based on
background. GW cleanup will
meet proposed ACLs for
fluoride 9.7 mg/1 and
sulfate 3,020 mg/1
$3,800,000
(present
worth)
$3,491,603
(capi tal)
$17,073,581
(present
worth O&M)
$6,707,400
(present
worth)
$144,000
(annual O&M
years 1-5)
$55,600
(annual O&M
years 6-30)
-------
I
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Sunaary Table
10
Reoion
X
X
X
X
X
Site Kane,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
Pacific Hide and
Fur, ID
Industrial
Faci 1 i ty
06/28/88
Ist-Final
Ponders Corner,
WA
06/01/84
IRM
Ponders Corners,
WA
09/30/85
2nd
Queen City
Farms, WA
10/24/85
1st
South Tacbma
Channel Well
12A, WA
03/18/83
IRM
Threat/Problem Waste Volume
Soil contaminated 8,200 yd3
with PCBs
GW contaminated with Not
VOCs and organics specified
GW and soil Not
contaminated with specified
VOCs including TCE
and PCE
SW, soil, and 22,000 yd3
sediments
contaminated with
VOCs including TCE,
organics including
PCBs, and metals
including chromium
and lead
GW contaminated with Not
VOCs including TCE specified
Components of
Selected Remedy
Excavation of soil followed by screening to
separate large contaminated materials and
stabilization fixation of a portion of the
soil using an immobilization technique;
construction of a bottom clay liner, where
necessary; and capping of the stabilized
material along with any remaining
contaminated materials; removal of some GW
monitoring wells; GW monitoring; and deed
and access restrictions. Onsite
consolidation will be implemented if pilot
testing finds treatment impracticable
GW treatment using air stripping; and
conduction of RI/FS
Continued operation of H1-H2 treatment
system; installation of variable-frequency
controllers on well pump motors to reduce
energy requirements; changing of fan drives
on treatment tower; installation of new
monitoriong wells, upgrading of existing
wells, and continued sampling and analysis
of aquifer; excavation and offsite disposal
of septic tanks and drain field piping; and
placement of administrative restrictions on
excavation of soil and installation and
usage of wells
Excavation, stabilization, and offsite
disposal of sludges, sediments, and soils;
and capping
GW pump and treatment using air stripping
Cleanup Goals
The soil cleanup goal for
PCBs 25 mg/kg by weight was
established as the EPA
cleanup policy for PCB
spills and corresponds with
health-based risk level for
the entire site (including
hot spot areas)
Not specified
The remedy will meet the
recommended occupational air
levels for VOCs which are
based on OSHA Standards
-
Not specified
Not specified
Present
Worth/
Capital and
OSM Costs
$1,330,000 -
$1,890,000
(present
worth)
$1,163,000
(capital)
$82,000
(annual Q&M)
$334,970
( capi tal )
$82,000
(annual O&M)
$3,439,000
(capital)
O&M (PRP
responsi-
bility)
$1,200,000
( capi tal )
$60,000
(annual O&M)
-------
FY82-FY88 Record of Decision Summary Table
Region
X
X
X
X
X
Site Name,
State/Type/
Signature Date/
Remedial Action
South Tacoma
Channel Well
12A, WA
05/03/85
2nd
Toftdahl Drums,
WA
09/30/86
1 st-Fi nal
United Chrome, OR
09/12/86
1 st-Fi nal
Western
Processing, WA
08/05/84
1st
Western
Processing, WA
09/25/85
2nd
Threat/Problem
GW and soil
contaminated with
VOCs including TCE
and PCE
None
GW and soil
contaminated with
metals including
chromium
GW and soil
contaminated with
VOCs including TCE,
inorganics including
cyanide, pesticides,
and metals including
arsenic and cadmium
GW, SW, soil, and
creek sediments
contaminated with
VOCs, organics
including PCBs and
PAHs , and metal s
Waste Volume
Not
specified
Not
specified
350 tons
(off site
disposal )
Not
specified
Not
specified
Components of
Selected Remedv
Continue operation of IRM; construction of a
GW treatment system; excavation and off site
disposal of contaminated soil with soil
flushing; and maintenance of institutional
controls
No further action with GW monitoring
Excavation and off site disposal of soils;
flushing of soils above shallow GW table;
and GW pump and treatment using chemical
reduction and precipitation with discharge
to POTW or SW
Removal and off site disposal /incineration of
all bulk liquids, drummed liquids, waste
piles, and other debris; removal and proper
disposal of all transformers and substation
equipment; demolition and off site disposal
of all onsite buildings; dismantling of all
onsite bulk storage tanks; controlling and
treatment of stormwater; and onsite and
perimeter monitoring of air quality
Soil sampling and analysis of onsite and
off site areas; excavation and off site
disposal of selected soils and non-soil
materials; excavation or cleaning and
plugging all utility and process lines in
Area I; GW extraction and treatment;
stormwater control; excavation and onsite
disposal of selected soils; excavation of
utility lines; cleaning utility manholes and
vaults; capping; performing bench scale
testing of soil solidification technique;
and excavation of Mill Creek sediments; and
performing supplemental remedial planning
studies if GW contamination migrates
Cleanup Goals
Specific GW cleanup goals
have not been established.
Attainment of the 10~b
risk range has been
recommended
Not specified
The chromium cleanup
criteria for the confined
aquifer is 0.05 mg/1 and
10 mg/1 for the unconfined
zone. A treatment effluent
concentration of 0.3 to 0.4
mg/1 chromium is expected to
be maintained
Not specified
All soils contaminated with
PCBs over 2 mg/kg apd hot
spots exceeding 10"^ risk
level will be excavated.
Aquatic organisms will be
protected through MCL or ACL
goal s
Present
Worth/
Capital and
O&M Costs
$1,590,000
(capital)
$50,000
(annual O&M)
$0
$1,580,000
{ capi tal )
$261,000
(annual O&M)
$5,000,000
( capi tal )
O&M (not
specified)
$18,100,000
(capital)
$2,000,000
(annual O&M)
-------
-------
SECTION V
RECORDS OF DECISION
KEYWORD LIST: FY 1982-1989
The ROD Keyword List presents the RODs approved from FY 1982-1989
by major keyword categories and subcategories. The list is a compilation
of those keywords identified for each site in the ROD abstracts found at the
beginning of this document. The first two pages of this list provide an index
of all keyword categories and subcategories. The following text lists those
RODs associated with each keyword.
299
-------
RECORD OF DECISION KEYWORD LIST INDEX
Listed below are major keyword categories and their subcategories for Superfund Records of Decision
(RODs).
Primary Hazardous
Substances Detected
Adds
Arsenic
Asbestos
Benzene
Carcinogenic Compounds
Chromium
Dioxin
Inorganics (other than metals)
Lead
Metals
Mining Wastes
Oils
Organics
PAHs
PCBs
PCE
Pesticides
Phenols
Radioactive Materials
Solvents
TCE
Toluene
VOCs
Xylenes
Contaminated Media
Air
Debris
Ground Water
Sediment
Sludge
Soil
Surface Water
Public Health and
Environmental Threats
Direct Contact
Public Exposure
Remedy Selection
ARAR Waiver
Institutional Controls
Interim Remedy
No Action Remedy
O&M
ROD Amendment
Water Supply
Alternate Water Supply
Drinking Water Contaminants
Site-Specific Characteristics
Floodplain
Sole-Source Aquifer
Wetlands
Standards/Regulations/Permits/Guidance
Hybrid/Alternate Closure (not under RCRA)
ARARs (not listed as a keyword after FY 1988)
Clean Air Act
Clean Water Act
Water Quality Criteria
RCRA
Closure Requirements
Clean Closure
Landfill Closure
Safe Drinking Water Act
MCLs
MCLGs
State Standards/Regulations
Toxic Substances Control Act
Public Health Advisory
State Guidance
State Permit
Testing/Pilot Studies
Leachability Tests
Treatability Studies
300
-------
RECORD OF DECISION KEYWORD LIST INDEX
(Continued)
Technology
Aeration
Air Monitoring
Air Stripping
Biodegradation/Land Application
Capping
Carbon Adsorption (GAC)
Decontamination
Dredging
Excavation
Filling
Ground Water Monitoring
Ground Water Treatment
Incineration/Thermal Destruction
Leachate Collection/Treatment
Levees
Offeite Discharge
Offsite Disposal
Offeite Treatment
Onsite Containment
Onsite Discharge
Onsite Disposal (includes residuals)
Onsite Treatment
Plume Management
Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW)
Relocation
Slurry Wall
Soil Washing/Flushing
Solidification/Stabilization
Solvent Extraction
Surface Water Collection/Diversion
Surface Water Monitoring
Surface Water Treatment
Temporary Storage
Treatment Technology
Vacuum Extraction
Venting
Volatilization/Soil Aeration
Vitrification
Miscellaneous
Municipally Owned Site
Historically Significant
ACL
Background Levels
Deferred Decision
Initial Remedial Measure (IRM)
Contingent Remedy
301
-------
SUPERFUND RECORDS OF DECISION; KEYWORD LIST
Listed below are major keyword categories and their subcategories for Superfund Records of
Decision (RODs). Following each of these categories is a broad sampling of RODs containing the •.
listed keyword. Some categories may become obsolete or new categories may develop over time due
to changes in the focus of the Superfund remedy selection process; these categories have been noted,
as appropriate. The Superfund managers in each Region have copies of all RODs.
KEYWORDS (BY CATEGORY) AND ASSOCIATED ROD SITES
(BY SITE. STATE (REGION))
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Acids
Charles George, MA (I)*; Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Nyanza Chemical,
MA (I); Western Sand & Gravel, RI (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); Chemical Control, NJ (II);
Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; PAS Oswego, NY (II); Bruin Lagoon, PA (III); Douglassville,
PA (III); Fike Chemical, WV (III); Lackawanna Refuse Site, PA (III); Southern Maryland Wood,
MD (III); A&F Materials-IRM, IL (V); Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V);
Forest Waste, MI (V)*; Northside Sanitary Landfill/ Environmental Conservation and Chemical
Corporation, IN (V); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI); Tar Creek, OK (VI); Arkansas City Dump, KS
(VII); Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII); Celtor Chemical
Works, CA (IX); Iron Mountain Mines, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX)*; Gould, OR (X);
Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD WA (X); Western Processing, WA (X)
Arsenic
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA
(I)*; Groveland Wells, MA (I); Hocomonco Pond, MA (I); Industri-plex, MA (I); Iron Horse Park,
MA (I); Nyanza Chemical, MA (I); Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; W.R. Grace (Acton Plant),
MA (I); Chemical Control, NJ (II); Chemical Insecticide, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Claremont
Polychemical, NY (II)*; D'Imperio Property, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); Helen Kramer, NJ
(II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (9/30/85), NJ (II)*; Lipari Landfill (7/11/88), NJ (II)*;
Love Canal, NY (II); Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Montgomery Township Housing, NJ
(II)*; North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY (II); Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY (II); Sinclair Refinery,
NY (II); Spence Farm, NJ (II); Syncon Resins, NJ (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Volney Landfill,
NY (II); York Oil, NY (II); Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Chisman Creek, VA
(III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville, PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*;
Havertown PCP, PA (III); Hederson Road, PA (III); McAdoo-IRM, PA (III); Moyer Landfill, PA
(III); New Castle Steel DE (III); Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III); Ordnance Works Disposal
Areas (Amendment), WV (III); Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III); Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III);
Wildcat Landfill, DE (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE (III)*; American Creosote, FL (IV); Cape Fear
Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); Davie
Landfill, FL (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Kassouf-Kimberling Battery, FL (IV); National
Starch, NC (IV); Newport Dump, KY (IV); Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC (IV); Pepper's
Steel-EDD, FL (IV); Sapp Battery, FL (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits,
FL (IV); Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Arcanum Iron & Metal, OH (V); Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V);
Byron/Johnson Salvage Yard, IL (V); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V);
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
302
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Arsenic (continued)
Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort
Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Morris Arsenic, MN (V);
New Brighton (TGAAP), MN (V)*; New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN (V);
Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); South Andover, MN (V); Summit National, OH (V); United
Scrap Lead, OH (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Windom Dump, MN (V); Atchison/Santa
Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Crystal City Airport, TX (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Highlands Acid Pit,
TX (VI)*; Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Mid-South Wood, AR
(VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI)*; South Calvacade Street, TX (VI);
United Nuclear, NM (VI); Big River Sand, KS (VII); Kern-Pest Laboratory, MO (VII); Todtz,
Lawrence Farm, IA (VII); Anaconda Smelter/Mill Creek, MT (VIII); Arsenic Trioxide, ND (VIII);
Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII)*; Milltown, MT (VIII);
Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII)*; Celtor Chemical, CA (IX)*; Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX);
Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Litchfield Airport (9/26/89), AZ (IX); Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA
(IX); McColl, CA (DC); Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Commencement Bay/NearShore (9/30/89),
WA (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Western Processing, WA (X)
Asbestos
Asbestos Dump, NJ (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Ambler Asbestos Piles (9/29/89), PA (III);
Fike Chemical, WV (III); Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking, PA (III); West Virginia Ordnance, WV
(III); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Johns-Manville, IL (V); New Lyme, OH (V); Broderick
Wood Products, CO (VIII); Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX);
Mountain View/Globe, AZ Asbestos(IX); Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos, CA (IX);
South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX)*; Martin Marietta, OR (X)
Benzene
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA
(I)*; Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering Well
Field, CT (I)*; Landfill & Resource Recovery, RI (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield Landfill,
VT (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); W.R.
Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II)*; Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*;
Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ
(II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II);
Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (7/11/88), NJ (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Port
Washington Landfill, NY (II); Vega Alta, PR (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II); York Oil, NY (II);
Craig Farm Drum, PA (HI); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III);
Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Havertown PCP, PA
(III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III)*; Kane and Lombard, MD (III); L.A
Clarke & Son, VA (III); Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); Westline, PA (III)*; Wildcat Landfill,
DE (III); Airco, KY (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Celanese Fibers Operations, NC
(IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC
(IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); Goodrich, B.F.,. KY (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); Newsome
Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); Perdido Groundwater, AL (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV);
Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; Cliff/Dow
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
303
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Benzene (continued)
Dump, MI (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Fort
Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*;
Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V);
MIDCO I, IN (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; Ninth Avenue
Dump, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Northside Sanitary
Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oak Grove Landfill, MN
(V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Pristine, OH (V); Seymour, IN (V)*; Summit National,
OH (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*;
Windom Dump, MN (V); Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI); Highlands Acid Pits, TX (VI)*;
Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX
(VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI)*; South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); Chemplex, IA (VII);
Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Todtz, Lawrence
Farm, IA (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, LA (VII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Koppers
(Oroville Plant), CA (DC); Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Operating
Industries, CA (IX); Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries (09/30/88), CA
(DC)*; Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX); Commencement
Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X)
Carcinogenic Compounds
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA
(I); Charles George, MA (I)*; Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Hocomonco Pond, MA (I); Iron Horse
Park, MA (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Laurel Park, CT (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I);
O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA
(I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Wells
G&H, MA (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); Bog Creek Farm, NJ
(II)*; Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II)*; Chemical Insecticide, NJ (II);
Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Clothier Disposal,NY (II); DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Diamond Alkali, NJ
(II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); Glen
Ridge Radium, NJ (II); Katonah Municipal Well, NY (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill
(7/11/88), NJ (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Marathon Battery (9/30/88), NY (II)*;
Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II); Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ (II); Montgomery Township, NJ
(II); North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY (II); Old Bethpage, NY (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY
(II); Preferred Plating, NY (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Berks
Sand Pit, PA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); CryoChem, PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel,
DE (III); Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Fike Chemical,
WV (III); Havertown PCP, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III)*;
Middletown Airfield, PA (III); MW Manufacturing, PA (III); Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III);
Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III); Strasburg Landfill, PA (III); Taylor
Borough, PA (III); West Virginia Ordnance, WV (III)*; Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III);
Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV); Airco, KY (IV); American Creosote Works, TN (IV);
American Creosote Works, FL (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Brown Wood Preserving, FL (IV);
Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Carolawn, SC (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*;
Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); Geiger (C&M
Oil), SC (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Hollingsworth, FL (IV); Kassouf-Kimberling Battery, FL
(TV); National Starch, NC (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); Powersville Landfill,
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
304
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Carcinogenic Compounds (continued)
GA (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical
(LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Alsco Anaconda,
OH (V); Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Big D Campground, OH (V);
Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Cross Brothers
Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*;
Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Ionia City Landfill, MI (V); Kysor Industrial, MI (V); Liquid Disposal,
MI (V); Long Prairie, MN (V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Miami County Incinerator, OH
(V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); New Brighton (TCAAP),
MN (V)*; Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Northside Sanitary
Landfill/ Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Ott/Story/Cordova
Chemical, MI (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Pristine, OH (V); Reilly Tar, MN (V);
U.S. Aviex, MI (V); Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Wausau Water
Supply, WI (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V)*; Wedzeb Enterprises, IN (V); Windom Dump, MN
(V); Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI);
Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Pesses Chemical,
TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI)*; South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South
Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; United Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Chemplex, IA (VII); Conservation Chemical,
MO (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Hastings
Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*;
Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*; Syntex Verona, MO (VII); Times Beach, MO (VII)*;
Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO
(VIII)*; Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO (VIII); Atlas Asbestos
Mine, CA (IX); Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX);
Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); IBM (San Jose), CA (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA
(IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Litchfield Airport (9/26/89),
AZ (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries
(09/30/88), CA (IX)*; Raytheon, CA (IX); Sacramento Army Depot, CA (IX); San Fernando Area I,
CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San Gabriel Area I, CA (IX); South Bay
Asbestos, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX)*; Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX); Tucson
International Airport, AZ (IX); Colbert Landfill, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X);
Commencement Bay/Nearshore (9/30/89), WA (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northside Landfill,
WA (X); Pacific Hide and Fur, ID (X); Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X)
Chromium
Hocomonco Pond, MA (I); Industri-plex, MA (I); Nyanza Chemical, MA (I); Saco Tannery Waste
Pits, ME (I)*; Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*;
Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); DTmperio Property, NJ (II); Ewan
Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; Haviland Complex, NY (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II);
Lang Property, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (9/30/85), NJ (II)*; Lipari Landfill (7/11/88), NJ (II)*;
Preferred Plating, NY (II); Sinclair Refinery, NY (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Spence Farm, NJ
(II); Syncon Resins, NJ (II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ (II); Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Craig Farm
Drum, PA (HI); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville,
PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Havertown PCP, PA (III); Limestone Road, MD (III);
Matthews Electroplating, VA (III); McAdoo-IRM, PA (III); New Castle Steel DE (III); Voortman
Farm, PA (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE (III)*; Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving,
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
305
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Chromium (continued)
NC (TV); Celanese Fibers Operations, NC (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment),
NC (IV); Davie Landfill, FL (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Independent Nail, SC (IV)*;
National Starch, NC (IV); Newport Dump, KY (IV); Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC (IV); Pepper's
Steel-EDD, FL (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Whitehouse Waste
Oil Pits, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Big
D Campground, OH (V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Fort Wayne
Reduction, IN (V); Ionia City Landfill, MI (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); Kysor Industrial, MI (V);
MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; Northernaire, MI (V);
Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Novaco Industries, MI (V); Republic Steel Quarry, OH (V); Schmalz
Dump, WI (V); Schmaltz Dump, WI (V)*; South Andover, MN (V); Summit National, OH (V);
Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V);Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI);
Highlands Add Pit, TX (VI)*; Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Mid-South Wood, AR (VI);
Motco, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI)*;Odessa Chromium
II, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium II, TX (VI)*; South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); Doepke Disposal
(Holliday), KS (VII); Todtz, Lawrence Farm, IA (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Central
City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII)*; Del Norte, CA (IX); Koppers
(Oroville Plant), CA (EX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Litchfield Airport (9/26/89), AZ; Selma
Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX); Frontier Hard Chrome (12/30/87), WA
(X); Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X); United
Chrome, OR (X); Western Processing, WA (X)*
DIoxin
Baird & McGuire, MA (I); Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); Hyde Park-EDO, NY (II); Love Canal, NY
(II); Love Canal, NY (II)*; Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Havertown PCP, PA (III);
American Creosote Works, FL (IV); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Miami
County Incinerator, OH (V); Pristine, OH (V); United Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Conservation
Chemical, MO (VII); Ellisville MO (VII); Ellisville Site Area, MO (VII)*; Minker/Stout/Romaine
Creek, MO (VII)*; Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII); Syntex Verona, MO (VII); Times Beach, MO
(VII); Times Beach, MO (VII)*; Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT
(VIII)*; Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (DC); Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX)
Inorganics
Auburn Road, NH (I); Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Hocomonco Pond,
MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Nyanza Chemical, MA (I); Picillo Farm, RI (I); Sylvester, NH
(I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II); Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Chemical
Control, NJ (II); D'Imperio Property, NJ (II); Florence Landfill, NJ (II); Friedman Property, NJ (II);
GEMS Landfill, NJ (II); GE Wiring Devices, PR (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Krysowaty Farm, NJ
(II); Love Canal, NY (II); North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY (II); Old Bethpage, NY (II); Price
Landfill, NJ (II)*; Sharkey Landfill, NJ (II); Sinclair Refinery, NY (II); Aladdin Plating, PA (III);
Army Creek Landfill, DE (III); Bruin Lagoon, PA (III)*; Chisman Creek, VA (III); Chisman Creek,
VA (III)*; Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Douglassville, PA (III);
Drake Chemical, PA (HI); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Fike Chemical, WV (III); Harvey-Knott, DE
(III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Leetown Pesticide, WV (III); Limestone Road, MD (III);
McAdoo-IRM, PA (IH); New Castle Steel DE (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III); Rhinehart Tire Fire,
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
306
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Inorganics (continued)
VA (III); Voortman Farm, PA (III); Wade, PA (III); Airco, KY (IV); A L. Taylor, KY (IV);
Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Distler Brickyard, KY (IV); Gallaway
Ponds, TN (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Hipps Road Landfill, FL (IV); Independent Nail, SC
(IV)*; Newport Dump, KY (IV); Pioneer Sand, FL (IV); SCRDI Dixiana, SC (IV); Tower Chemical,
FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); A&F Materials-IRM, IL (V); A&F Materials-EDO, IL (V)*; Acme
Solvents, IL (V); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Bower's Landfill, OH
(V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Cemetery Dump, MI (V); Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V); E.H.
Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Forest Waste, MI (V)*; Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Industrial
Excess Landfill, OH (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); Lake Sandy Jo, IN (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V);
Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical
Corporation, IN (V); Oak Grove Landfill, MN (V); Pristine, OH (V); Reilly Tar, MN (V); Republic
Steel Quarry, OH (V); Rose Township, MI (V); South Andover, MN (V); Summit National, OH
(V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V); Windom Dump, MN (V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM
(VI); Cecil Lindsey, AR (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI);
Mid-South Wood, AR (VI); MOTCO, TX (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI)*;
Odessa Chromium II, TX (VI)*; Tar Creek, OK (VI); United Nuclear, NM (VI); Big River Sand,
KS (VII); Cherokee County/Galena, KS (VII); Ellisville, MO (VII); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill,
MO (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Syntex Verona, MO (VII); Anaconda
Smelter/Mill Creek, MT (VIII); California Gulch, CO (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII)*;
Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Iron Mountain Mine, CA (IX);
Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX); Ordot Landfill, GU (IX); South Bay Asbestos, CA (IX);
Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX); Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Martin Marietta, OR
(X)
Lead
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Iron Horse
Park, MA (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; Sullivan's Ledge,
MA (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Byron Barrel &
Drum, NY (II)*; Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ
(II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (7/11/88), NJ (II)*; Love
Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY (II); Preferred Plating, NY
(II); Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); York Oil, NY (II); Aladdin
Plating, PA (III); Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel,
DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III)*; Douglassville Disposal
(Amendment), PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard, PA (III); MW
Manufacturing, PA (III); New Castle Steel DE (III); Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment),
WV (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*; Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III);
Voortman Farm, PA (III); West Virginia Ordnance, WV (III)*; Wildcat Landfill, DE (III); Wildcat
Landfill, DE (III)*; Carolawn, SC (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Chemtronics, NC (IV);
Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Flowood, MS (IV); Independent Nail, SC (IV)*;
Kassouf-Kimberling Battery, FL (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Auto
Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; Forest Waste
Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Johns-Manville, IL
(V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Laskin/Poplar, OH (V)*; Miami County Incinerator, OH (V);
MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN (V); Ninth
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
307
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Lead (continued)
Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; NL/Taracorp/Golden Auto Parts, MN (V)*; Pristine, OH (V); Republic
Steel Quarry, OH (V); South Andover, MN (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); Wauconda Sand &
Gravel, IL (V)*; Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Industrial Waste
Control, AR (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); South Calvacade Street, TX (VI);
Cherokee County/Galena, KS (VII); Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS
(VH); Todtz, Lawrence Farm, IA (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Anaconda Smelter/Mill
Creek, MT (VIII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); California Gulch, CO (VIII); Central
City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII)*; Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfleld Airport, AZ (IX);
Purity Oil Sales, CA (DC); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA
(X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore (9/30/89), WA (X); Gould, OR (X)
Metals
Auburn Road, NH (I); Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I); Baird &
McGuire, MA (I)*; Cannon/Plymouth, MA (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Charles
George, MA (I)*; Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Hocomonco Pond, MA (I);
Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Keefe Environmental, NH (I); Laurel Park, CT (I); Norwood PCBs, MA
(I); Nyanza Chemical, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Ottati & Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Pinette's
Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I); Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; South Municipal
Water Supply, NH (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Sylvester, NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); W.R.
Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog,
NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II);
Chemical Insecticide, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Clothier
Disposal,NY (II); Chemical Control, NJ (II); Chemical Control, NJ (II)*; DeRewal Chemical, NJ
(II); D'Imperio Properly, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; Florence
Landfill, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GEMS Landfill, NJ (II); GE Wiring Devices, PR (II);
Haviland Complex, NY (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Lang Property, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill
(9/30/85), NJ (II)*; Lipari Landfill (7/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II); Love Canal/93rd
Street School, NY (II)*; Marathon Battery, NY (II); Marathon Battery (9/30/88), NY (II)*;
Marathon Battery (9/29/89), NY (II)*; Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II); North Sea Municipal Landfill,
NY (II); PAS Oswego, NY (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Pijak Farm, NJ (II); Preferred Plating,
NY (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY (II); Sharkey Landfill, NJ (II); Sinclair
Refinery, NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Syncon Resins, NJ (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II);
Volney Landfill, NY (II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Aladdin Plating, PA (III);
Army Creek Landfill, DE (III); Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Blosenski Landfill, PA (III); Bruin Lagoon,
PA (III)*; Chisman Creek, VA (III); Chisman Creek, VA (III)*; Craig Farm Drum, PA (III);
Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal
(Amendment), PA (III); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III)*; Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Enterprise
Avenue, PA (III); Fike Chemical, WV (III); Harvey-Knott, DE (III); Havertown PCP, PA (III);
Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Kane & Lombard, MD (III);
McAdoo-IRM, PA (III); Millcreek, PA (III); Moyer Landfill, PA (III); MW Manufacturing, PA (III);
New Castle Steel DE (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*; Rhinehart Tire
Fire, VA (III); SaltvUle Waste Disposal Ponds, VA (III); Sand, Gravel & Stone, MD (III);
Voortman Farm, PA (III); Wade, PA (III); West Virginia Ordnance, WV (III)*; Whitmoyer
Laboratories, PA (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE (III)*; A. L. Taylor, KY
(IV); American Creosote, FL (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
308
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Metals (continued)
(IV); Carolawn, SC (IV); Celanese Fibers Operations, NC (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*;
Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); Distler
Brickyard, KY (IV); Flowood, MS (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Hipps Road Landfill, FL (IV);
Hollmgsworth, FL (IV); Independent Nail, SC (IV)*; Kassouf-Kimberling Battery, FL (IV); Miami
Drum Services, FL (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV);
Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC (IV); Pepper's Steel-EDD, FL (IV); Pioneer Sand, FL (IV)-
Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); Sapp Battery, FL (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Stauffer Chemical
(Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Tower Chemical FL (TV)-
Zellwood, FL (IV); A&F Materials-IRM, IL (V); A&F Materials-EDD, IL (V)*; Allied/Ironton '
Coke, OH (V)*; Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Arcanum Iron & Metal, OH (V); Auto Ion Chemicals,
MI (V); Big D Campground, OH (V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V);
Byron/Johnson Salvage Yard, IL (V); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; Coshocton Landfill, OH (V);
E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Forest Waste, MI (V)*; Fort
Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Ionia
City Landfill, MI (V); Kysor Industrial, MI (V); Lake Sandy Jo, IN (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V);
Marion/Bragg Landfill, IN (V); Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II,
IN (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; New Brighton/Arden Hills
(TCAAP), MN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Northernaire
Plating, MI (V)*; Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical
Corporation, IN (V); Oak Grove Landfill, MN (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Pristine,
OH (V); Republic Steel Quarry, OH (V); Schmalz Dump, WI (V); Schmalz Dump, WI (V)*;
Seymour, IN (V); South Andover, MN (V); Summit National, OH (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V);
Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Windom Dump, MN (VV
Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI); Bio-Ecology Systems TX
(VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Crystal City Airport, TX (VI); Dixie Oil, TX (VI); French Limited, TX
(VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI); Highlands Acid
Pit, TX (VI)*; Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Johns-Manville, IL (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX
(VI); MOTCO, TX (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI); Old Inger, LA (VI);
Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); Sand Springs, OK (VI)*; Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI)*; South
Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; Tar Creek, OK (VI); United Nuclear,
NM (VI); Big River Sand, KS (VII); Cherokee County/Galena, KS (VII); Cherokee County, KS
(VII)*; Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Kern-Pest
Laboratory, MO (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Todtz, Lawrence Farm, LA
(VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, LA (VII); Anaconda Smelter/Mill Metals Creek, MT (VIII); Broderick
Wood Products, CO (VIII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); California Gulch, CO (Vim-
Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII)*; Libby Ground Water
MT (VIII); Marshall Landfill, CO (VIII); Milltown, MT (VIII); Milltown-S, MT (VIII); Monticello
Vicinity Properties, UT (VIII); Smuggler Mountain, CO (VIII); Union Pacific, WY (VIII);
Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII)*; Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (IX);
Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX); Celtor Chemical Works, CA (IX); Celtor Chemical, CA
(IX)*; Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Iron Mountain Mine, CA (IX); Jibboom Junkyard, CA
(IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA
(IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX); Ordot Landfill, GU (IX); Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Selma
Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits-IRM, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX)*;
Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore (9/30/89), WA (X);
Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Gould, OR
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
309
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Metals (continued)
(X); Northside Landfill, WA (X); Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X); United Chrome, OR (X);
Western Processing, WA (X); Western Processing, WA (X)*
Mining Wastes
Tar Creek, OK (VI); United Nuclear, NM (VI); Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; California Gulch, CO
(Vim; Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII)*; Milltown, MT (VIII); Monticello Vicinity Properties,
UT (VIII); Smuggler Mountain, CO (VIII); Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Celtor Chemical Works,
CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Iron Mountain Mine, CA (IX)
Oils
Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); McKin, ME (I)*; Bridgeport, NJ (II); Burnt
Fly Bog, NJ (II); Pijak Farm, NJ (II); Price Landfill, NJ (II); Bruin Lagoon, PA (III); Bruin Lagoon,
PA (III)*; Douglassville Disposal, PA (III)*; Enterprise Avenue, PA (III); Havertown PCP, PA (III);
Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking, PA (III); Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III); Airco, KY (IV); American
Creosote Works, TN (IV); Coleman Evans, FL (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Goodrich, B.F.,
KY (IV); Miami Drum Services, FL (IV); Mowbray Engineering, AL (IV); A&F Materials-IRM, IL
(V); Forest Waste-IRM, MI (V); Forest Waste, MI (V)*; Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Laskin/Poplar
Oil, OH (V)*; New Lyme, OH (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*;
Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Old
Mill, OH (V); Outboard Marine Corp., IL (V); Reilly Tar, MN (V); Geneva Industries, TX (VI);
Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Mid-South Wood, AR (VI); Old Inger, LA (VI);
Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII)*; Ellisville, MO (VII);
Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Union Pacific, WY (VIII);
Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement BayyTacoma, WA (X); Western
Processing, WA (X)
Organlcs/VOCs
Auburn Road, NH (I); Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I); Beacon Heights,
CT (I); Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Charles George, MA (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA
(I)*; Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Hocomonco Pond, MA (I);
Industri-plex, MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Keefe Environmental, NH (I); Keefe Environmental
Services, NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I); Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*; Landfill
& Resource Recovery, RI (I); Laurel Park, CT (I); McKin-IRM, ME (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I);
Nyanza Chemical, MA (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Ottati and Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I);
Picillo Farm, RI (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose
Disposal Pit, MA (I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Sylvester,
NH (I); Tinkham Garage, NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); Western Sand & Gravel, RI (I); Winthrop
Landfill-EDD, ME (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); American
Thermostat, NY (II); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II)*; Brewster Well Field, NY
(II); Brewster Well Field (9/29/88), NY (II); Bridgeport, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II); Burnt Fly
Bog, NJ (II)*; Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Caldwell Trucking, NJ
(II)'; Chemical Control, NJ (II); Chemical Control, NJ (II)*; Chemical Insecticide, NJ (II);
Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Clothier Disposal, NY (II); Combe Fill
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
310
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Organics/VOCs (continued)
1' NJ (II); C°mbe Fil1 South ^^ NJ (II); DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Diamond
™ ™ J ( ); D'ImPerio Property, NJ (II); Endicott Village Well Field, NY (II); Ewan Property,
NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); Florence Landfill, NJ (ID-
Friedman Property, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Moreau, NY (II); GEMS Landfill NJ
2SJ S?°^ Fan?' NJ (II); Haviland C^P16*' NY (H); Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Hyde Park-EDO,
NY (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Lang Property NJ my
Lipari LandfiU(9^0/85), NJ (II)*; Lipari Landfill (7/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone Pine llndfiU, NJ (II);
Love Canal, NY (II); Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel NY CUV
Marathon Battery (9/30/88), NY (II)*; Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II); Montgomery Township, NJ
S?!,^1 g°mery TownshiP Housing, NJ (II)*; Nascolite, NJ (II); Old Bethpage, NY (II); Olean
Well Reid, NY (II); PAS Oswego, NY (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Pijak Farm, NJ (II); Port
Washington Landfill, NY (II); Preferred Plating, NY (II); Price Landfill, NJ (II)*; Reich Farm NJ
Mr* *eno°ra,InC"DN« (II>; Ringed Mines/Landfill, NY (II); Rocky Hill, NJ (II); Sharkey Landfill,
NJ (II); Sinclair Refinery, NY (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Suffern Village Well Field NY (IIV
Swope Oil, NJ (II); Syncon Resins, NJ (II); Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ (II); Upjohn
Manufacturing, PR (II); Vega Alta, PR (II); Vestal, NY (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II); Waldick
Aerospace, NJ (II); Williams Property, NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Army Creek Landfill, DE (HIV
?3 L^r ^fTter C01"3™"311011' PA (HI); Bendix, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); Blosenski
Landfill, PA (III); Bruin Lagoon, PA (III)*; Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); CryoChem, PA (III)-
Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill PA (III)-
Douglassville, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Douglassville Disposal, PA
?S "P Ar?m iemiCaVPA (IH); Dfake ChemiCa1' PA
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Organlcs/VOCs (continued)
(V): Berlin & Farro, MI (V); Big D Campground, OH (V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V);
Byron/Johnson Salvage Yard, IL (V); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; Cemetery Dump, MI (V);
Charlevoix, MI (V); Charlevoix, MI (V)*; Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V);
Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Eau Claire-IRM, WI (V); Eau Claire Municipal Well Field,
WI (V)*; E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); FMC Corporation, MN (V)*; Forest Waste Disposal, MI
(V)*' Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V);
Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V); Ionia City Landfill, MI (V); Kysor Industrial, MI (V); Kummer
Landfill, MN (V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*;
Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V)*; Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Long Prairie, MN (V); Main Street Wellfield,
IN (V)1 Marion/Bragg Landfill, IN (V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Miami County Incinerator,
OH (V): MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); New Brighton/Arden
Hills (Amendment), MN (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN (V); New Brighton/Arden
Hills/St Anthony, MN (V)*; New Brighton-Interim Water Treatment, MN (V)*; New Bnghton/St.
Anthony-IRM, MN (V); New Brighton (TCAPP), MN (V)*; New Brighton-Water Supply System,
MN (V)*; New Lvme> OH 00; Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*;
Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and
Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oak Grove Landfill, MN (V); Old Mill OH (V); Ott/Story/Cordova
Chemical, MI (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Pristine, OH (V); Reilly Tar &
Chemical, MN (V)*; Republic Steel Quarry, OH (V); Rose Township, MI (V); Seymour, IN (V);
Seymour, IN (V)*; South Andover, MN (V); Summit National, OH (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V);
Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Verona Well Field-IRM, MI (V); Verona Well Field, MI (V)*; Waite
Park Wells, MN (V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V);
Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V)*; Wedzeb Enterprises, IN (V);
Windom Dump, MN (V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI);
Bayou Sorrel, LA (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cecil Lindsey, AR (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI);
Dixie Oil, TX (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Geneva Industries, TX (VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI);
Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI)*; Industrial
Waste Control, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); MOTCO, TX (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; North
Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Old Inger, LA (VI); Petro-Chemical Systems, TX (VI); Sand Springs,
OK (VI)*; Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI)*; Sikes
Disposal Pits, TX (VI); Sol Lynn (03/25/88), TX (VI); Sol Lynn (09/23/88), TX (VI)*; South
Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*; South Valley-IRM, NM (VI);
South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; South Valley/SJ-6, NM (VI)*; Triangle Chemical, TX (VI); United
Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Aidex-IRM, IA (VII); Aidex, IA (VII)*; Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Big
River Sand, KS (VT1); Chemplex, IA (VII); Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Deere, John,
Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Des Moines TCE, IA (VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII);
Ellisville, MO (VII); Ellisville Site Area, MO (VII)*; Findett, MO (VII); Hastings Ground Water,
NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings
Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*; Kern-Pest Laboratory, MO (VII); Shenandoah Stables, MO
(VID; Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Syntex Verona, MO (VII); Todtz, Lawrence Farm, LA (VII);
Voeel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Burlington Northern (Somers),
MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Marshall Landfill,
CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO (VIII); Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Union Pacific,
WY (VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII)*; Beckman
Instruments/Porterville, CA "(IX); Del Norte, CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View) CA (IX);
Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); IBM (San Jose), CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ (IX);
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
312
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Organics/VOCs (continued)
Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX)-
^7™ ?fel * Dnim' CA (IX); McColl) CA ola 52nd Street,
AZ (IX); Operating Industries, CA (IX); Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA (IX)*; Operating
Industries .(Um/88), CA (IX)*; Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (K ; Sacknfento X
Depot, CA (IX); San Fernando Area I, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX)- San
?f ^fTl'^n (D?; ^ Gabriel Vall6y (AreaS *' 2 & 4>' CA (K)*' Selma Pressure Treating,
?A (™);,™*gS°W ACld Pits-IRM> CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid
Pits, CA (IX)*; Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX); Colbert Landfill, WA (X); Commencement
™l ,fS ?f' ™ ( ); C001"1611061116111 Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88)
WA (X)*; Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northside Landfill, WA (X); Pacific Hide and Fur ID (XV
Ponders Corner-IRM, WA (X); Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X); South Tacoma WA (XV
South Tacoma Channel-Well 12A, WA (X)*; Western Processing, WA (X); Western Processing, WA
PAHs (Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons)
Baird & McGuire, MA (I); Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Cannon Engineering, MA (IV
Cannon/Plymouth, MA (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Iron Horse Park" MA (IV
Norwood PCBs MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); South Municipal
Water Supply, NH (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); Byron Barrel & Drum, NY
(II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Clothier Disposal,NY (II); DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Fulton
Terminals, NY (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; North Sea
Municipal Landfill, NY (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney
Road Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III)*; Douglassville
Disposal (Amendment) PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Havertown PCP, PA (111)1 Henderson
^Tf ' PA (In>*; K™6 & Lombard, MD (III); Millcreek, PA (III); Ordnance Works Disposal, WV
(HI); Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III); Taylor Borough, PA (III); Westline
Site, PA (III); Airco, KY (IV); A L. Taylor, KY (IV); American Creosote, FL (IV); American
Creosote Works, TN (IV); American Creosote Works, FL (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Brown
Wood Preserving, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers NC
SP^I^SS^1 OU)' SC (IV); Goodrich' B-R> KY ; Sodyeco> NC (IV)5 Whitehouse Waste
Oil Pits, FL (IV); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V); Auto Ion
Chemicals, MI (V); Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (VV
Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Forest Waste Disposal MI (V)*-
Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Industrial Excess Landfill OH (V)'*-
Lake Sandy Jo, IN (V);Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V)*; Miami County '
ncinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN
(V)*; Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation IN CW
nS"^Aar^N (,V^ReiUy Tar & ChemiCa1' MN *; Rose Township, MI (V); Summit' National,
OH (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI); Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI)*-
French Limited, TX (VI); Geneva Industries, TX (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Mid-South
Wood AR (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Old Midland Products, AR
(VI); Petro-Chemical Systems, TX (VI); South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); United Creosoting, TX
(VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Chemplex, IA (VII); Doepke
Disposal (Holhday), KS (VII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Libby Ground Water MT
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
313
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
PAHs (continued)
(VIII): Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (DC); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X);
Commencement Bay/Nearshore (9/30/89), WA (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Western Processing,
WA(X)*
PCBs (Polychlorinated Biphenyls)
Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield Landfill,
VT (I); Ottati & Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Picillo Farm, RI (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I);
Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Sullivan's
Ledge, MA (I); Tinkham Garage, NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); Bridgeport, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog,
NJ (IF); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Chemical Control, NJ (II); Clothier
DIsposal,NY (II); GE Moreau, NY (II); Goose Farm, NJ (II); Hudson River, NY (II); Hyde
Park-EDD, NY (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Krysowaty Farm, NJ (II); Ludlow Sand & Gravel,
NY (II); Pijak Farm, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); Sinclair Refinery, NY (II); Swope Oil, NJ (II);
Syncon Resins, NJ (II); Wide Beach, NY (II); York Oil, NY (II); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE
(III)- Douglassville, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III)*; Douglassville Disposal (Amendment),
PA (III); Fike Chemical, WV (III); Harvey-Knott, DE (III); Kane & Lombard, MD (III); Lehigh
Electric, PA (III); Millcreek, PA (III); MW Manufacturing, PA (III); Ordnance Works Disposal, WV
(HI); Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking, PA (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE (III); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC
(IV); Mowbray Engineering, AL (IV); Newport Dump Site, KY (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old
Reichhold, MS (IV); Pepper's Steel-EDD, FL (IV); SCRDI Dixiana, SC (IV); Smith's Farm, KY
(TVV A&F Materials-EDD, IL (V); A&F Materials-IRM, IL (V); Acme Solvents, IL (V); Alsco
Anaconda, OH (V); Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Berlin & Farro, MI (V); Biphenyls Byron/Johnson
Salvage Yard, IL (V); Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Forest
Waste-IRM, MI (V); Forest Waste, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); LaSalle Electrical, IL
(V)- LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*; Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V)*;
Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN
(V); New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V); Ninth Avenue
Dump IN (V)*; Northside Sanitary Landfill/ Environmental Conservation and Chemical
Corporation, IN (V); Old Mill, OH (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Outboard Marine
Corp IL (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Rose Township, MI (V); Schmalz Dump,
WI (V); Summit National, OH (V); Wedzeb Enterprises, IN (V); Bio-Ecology Systems, TX (VI);
French Limited, TX (VI); Geneva Industries, TX (VI); Gurley Pit, AR, (VI); MOTCO, TX (VI);
Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sol Lynn (03/25/88), TX (VI); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS
(VII)- Findett, MO (VII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Jibboom Junkyard, CA (IX); Lorentz
Barrel & Drum, CA (EX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Taputimu Farm, AS
(DC)- Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore (9/30/89), WA (X);
Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Northwest Transformer, WA (X); Pacific Hide and Fur, ID
(X); Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X); Western Processing, WA (X)*
PCE (Tetrachloroethylene/Perchloroethylene)
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Keefe Environmental, NH (I); Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*;
Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT(I); Picillo Farm, RI (I); Rose Disposal Pit,
MA (I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); American Thermostat, NY
(II)- Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Brewster Well Field (9/29/88), NY (II); Byron Barrel & Drum,
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
314
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
PCE (continued)
NY (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Claremont Polychemical, NY (ID*-
Clothier Disposal,NY (II); Combe Fill South Landfill, NJ (II); DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Ewan
S3SS' Sl^L^f *!r0perty' NJ (II)*; Kat0nah MuniciP*l Well, NY (II); Marathon Battery
(9/30/88), NY (II)*; Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Preferred
Plating NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); Rockaway Borough Wellfield, NJ (ID-
Rocky Hill, NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Vega Alta, PR (II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ (H)-
Williams Property, NJ (II); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit PA ttllV
Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III); CryoChem, PA (HI); Fischer & Porter, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA
gll); Henderson Road, PA (HI)*; Middletown Airfield, PA (III); MW Manufacturing, PA (III)-
Tysons Dump (Amendment), PA (III); Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III); A. L Taylor KY (IV)-
S™lvFiberS °Perations' NC (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (TV)-
SCRDI Dixiana, SC (IV); Big D Campground, OH (V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Byron Salvage
SSk (V)*; Byr°n Salvage Yard (6#°/89)> !L (V)*; Charlevoix, MI (V); Charlevoix, MI (V)*-
Chff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Eau Claire Municipal Well
Field, WI (V)*; FMC Corporation, MN (V)*; Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Industrial Excess
Landfill, OH (V)*; Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Kysor Industrial, MI (V); Liquid Disposal
MI (V); Long Prairie, MN (V); Main Street Wellfield, IN (V); Mason County Landfill MI (VV
Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills/St
Anthony, MN (V)*; New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN (V); Northernaire Plating, MI W*'
Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Pristine, OH (V); South Andover, MN (V); U.S. Aviex MI '
(V); Verona Well Field-IRM, MI (V); Verona Well Field, MI (V)*; Waite Park Wells, MN W
Wausau Water Supply, WI (V)*; Windom Dump, MN (V); Geneva Industries, TX (VI)-
Hardage/Crmer, OK (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI)*; South Valley/Edmunds' Street NM
(VI)*; South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; South Valley/SJ-6, NM (VI)*; Chemplex, IA (VII); Deere
John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII); Marshall '
Landfill, CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO (VIII); Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII)-
Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII)*; Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (S
San Jose), CA (DC); Indian Bend Wash, AZ (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (DC); Lorentz Barrel
& Drum, CA (DC); Operating Industries (09/30/88), CA (IX)*; Raytheon, CA (IX); Sacramento
Army Depot, CA (DC); San Fernando Area I, CA (DC); San Fernando Valley (Area 1) CA (IX)-
San Gabriel Area I, CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA (DC)*; Colbert Landfill, WA
(X); Northside Landfill, WA (X); Ponders Corner, WA (X)*; Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD WA
(X); South Tacoma Channel-Well 12A, WA (X)*
Pesticides
Baird & McGuire, MA (I); Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Cannon/Plymouth MA (I); Davis Liquid
Waste, RI (I); Ottati & Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); Chemical Control, NJ (ID-
Chemical Control, NJ (II)*; Chemical Insecticide, NJ (II); Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); Krysowaty Farm
NJ (II); Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II); Love Canal, NY (II); Love Canal, NY (IT)*; Love Canal/93rd '
Street School, NY (II)*; Pijak Farm, NJ (II); Renora, Inc., NJ (II); Syncon Resins, NJ (II);
Douglassville, PA (HI); Drake Chemical, PA (III); Leetown Pesticide, WV (III); Publicker/Cuyahoga
JS6^^ (^S' Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); Gallaway Ponds,
TN (IV); Miami Drum Services, FL (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); SCRDI Dixiana, SC (IV)-
Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Tower
Chemical, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V);
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
315
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Pesticides (continued)
Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; IMC Terre Haute, IN (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Liquid
Disposal, MI (V); Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI
(VY Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V);
Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Pristine, OH (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Bayou Sorrel,
LA (VI); Crystal City Airport, TX (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Old Inger, LA (VI); Aidex-IRM,
IA (VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Ellisville, MO (VII); Hastings
Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*; Kern-Pest Laboratory, MO (VII); Sand Creek Industrial,
CO (VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII)*; Del Norte, CA (IX);
Purity Oil Sales, CA (DC); Stringfellow Acid Pits-IRM, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX)*;
Taputimu Farm, AS (DC); Western Processing, WA (X)
Phenols
Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Hocomonco Pond, MA (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Picillo Farm, RI
(I)' Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II)*; Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Clothier Disposal, NY (II); Ewan
Property, NJ (H)*; Goose Farm, NJ (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Hyde Park-EDO, NY (II); Lipari
Landfill (9/30/85), NJ (II)*; Lipari Landfill (7/11/88), NJ (II)*; Love Canal, NY (II); Ludlow Sand &
Gravel, NY (II); Pijak Farm, NJ (II); Sinclair Refinery, NY (II); York Oil, NY (II); Avtex Fibers,
VA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill,
PA (III); Douglassville, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Drake Chemical,
PA (III)*; Havertown PCP, PA (III); Millcreek, PA (III); Sand, Gravel & Stone, MD (III); Westline,
PA (HI); American Creosote Works, TN (IV); Celanese Fibers Operations, NC (IV);
Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Coleman Evans, FL (IV); Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits, FL (IV);
Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Fort
Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical,
MN (V)*; Summit National, OH (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM
(VI); Geneva Industries, TX (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Sikes Disposal Pits, TX (VI);
Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Ellisville, MO (VII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII);
Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); Intel
(Mountain View), CA (DC); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX);
Raytheon, CA (IX); Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X);
Western Processing, WA (X)*
Radioactive Materials
Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II); Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ (II); Lansdowne Radiation, PA
(HI); Lansdowne Radiation, PA (III)*; Moyer Landfill, PA (III); United Nuclear, NM (VI); Denver
Radium Site Streets, CO (VIII); Denver Radium III, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Hth & Umatilla,
CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/12th & Quivas, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Card Property, CO
(Vni)*; Denver Radium/Open Space, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium ROBCO, CO (VIII)*; Monticello
Vicinity Properties, UT (VTII)
Solvents
Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Keefe Environmental, NH (I); McKin, ME (I)*; Pinette's Salvage Yard,
ME (I); Western Sand & Gravel, RI (I); Winthrop Landfill-EDD, ME (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
316
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Solvents (continued)
(I); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II); Chemical Control, NJ (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II);
Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Krysowaty Farm, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (9/30/85), NJ (II)*; Lone Pine
Landfill, NJ (II); Montgomery Township Housing, NJ (II)*; Spence Farm, NJ (II); Vestal, NY (II);
Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); Enterprise Avenue, PA (III);
Henderson Road, PA (III)*; Lackawanna Refuse Site, PA (III); McAdoo-IRM, PA (III); McAdoo
Associates, PA (III)*; Millcreek, PA (III); MW Manufacturing, PA (III); Miami Drum Services, FL
(IV); A&F Materials-IRM, IL (V); Berlin & Farro, MI (V); Charlevoix, MI (V); Coshocton Landfill,
OH (V); Cross Bros., IL (V); Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Ionia City Landfill, MI (V);
Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); New Brighton-Interim Water Treatment, MN (V)*; New
Brighton-Water Supply System, MN (V)*; New Lyme, OH (V); Old Mill, OH (V); Summit
National, OH (V); Verona Well Field, MI (V)*; Bio-Ecology Systems, TX (VI); Old Inger, LA (VI);
Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Doepke Disposal
(Holliday), KS (VII); Ellisville, MO (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII); Solid
State Circuits, MO (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX);
Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); IBM (San Jose), CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ (IX);
Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX);
Raytheon, CA (IX); Taputimu Farm, AS (IX); Northside Landfill, WA (X); Ponders Corner-IRM,
WA (X); Ponders Corner, WA (X)*; South Tacoma, WA (X); Western Processing, WA (X)
TCE (Trichloroethylene)
Auburn Road, NH (I); Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Charles
George, MA (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland
Wells, MA (I); Keefe Environmental, NH (I); Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I); Kellogg-Deering
Well Field, CT (I)*; McKin-IRM, ME (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I);
Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Sullivan's
Ledge, MA (I); Tinkham Garage, NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); Western Sand & Gravel, RI (I);
American Thermostat, NY (II); Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Brewster Well Field (9/29/88), NY
(II); Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II)*;
Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Combe Fill South Landfill, NJ (II); DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); D'Imperio
Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; Fulton Terminals, NY (II);
Goose Farm, NJ (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Lang Property, NJ (II); Marathon Battery
(9/30/88), NY (II)*; Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II); Montgomery Township Housing, NJ (II)*; Old
Bethpage, NY (II); Olean Well Field, NY (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill,
NY (II); Price Landfill, NJ (II)*; Reich Farm, NJ (II); Rockaway Borough Wellfield, NJ (II); Rocky
Hill, NJ (II); Sharkey Landfill, NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ (II);
Vega Alta, PR (II); Vestal, NY (II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ (II); Bendix, PA (III); Blosenski
Landfill, PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Fischer & Porter, PA (III); Havertown PCP, PA (III);
Heleva Landfill, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III)*; Industrial Lane,
PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III)*; Limestone Road, MD (III); Middletown
Airfield, PA (III); Millcreek, PA (HI); Moyer Landfill, PA (III); Strasburg Landfill, PA (III); Taylor
Borough, PA (III); Tyson's Dump (Amendment), PA (III); Airco, KY (IV); Carolawn, SC (W);
Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Distler Brickyard, KY (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV);
Hollingsworth, FL (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); A&F Materials-EDD, IL (V); Acme Solvents, IL
(V); Big D Campground, OH (V); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; Byron Salvage Yard (6/30/89), IL
(V)*; Charlevoix, MI (V); Charlevoix, MI (V)*; Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); Cross Brothers Pail
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
317
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
TCE (continued)
(Pembroke), IL (V); Eau Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; FMC Corporation, MN (V)*;
Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Kysor Industrial, MI (V);
LeHillier/Mankato, MN (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Long Prairie, MN (V); Main Street Wellfield,
IN (V); Marion/Bragg Landfill, IN (V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Miami County Incinerator,
OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); New Brighton/Arden
Hills/St. Anthony, MN (V)*; New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN (V); New Brighton-Interim
Water Treatment, MN (V)*; New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; New Brighton/St. Anthony-IRM,
MN (V); New Brighton-Water Supply System, MN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Northernaire
Plating, MI (V)*; Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical
Corporation, IN (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Pristine, OH (V); Seymour, IN (V);
South Andover, MN (V); Summit National, OH (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); Verona Well Field-IRM,
MI (V); Verona Well Field, MI (V)*; Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V)*;
Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Windom Dump, MN (V); Bio-Ecology Systems, TX (VI); Geneva
Industries, TX (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Sheridan
Disposal Services, TX (VI)*; Sol Lynn (09/23/88), TX (VI)*; South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM ,
(VI)*; South Valley/SJ-6, NM (VI)*; Chemplex, IA (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque Works, LA (VII);
Des Moines TCE, LA (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII); Marshall Landfill,
CO (VII); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO (VIII); Sand Creek
Industrial, CO (VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII)*; Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX);
Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA
(IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (LX); Litchfield Airport (9/26/89), AZ; Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA
(LX); MOM Brakes, CA (IX); Operating Industries, CA (IX); Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA
(LX)*; Operating Industries (09/30/88), CA (IX)*; Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX);
Sacramento Army Depot, CA (IX); San Fernando Area I, CA (IX); San Gabriel/Area I, CA (IX);
San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA (IX)*; Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX); Tucson
International Airport, AZ (LX); Colbert Landfill, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA
(X)*; Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northside Landfill, WA (X); Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA
(X); South Tacoma, WA (X); South Tacoma Channel-Well 12A, WA (X)*; Western Processing, WA
(X)
Toluene
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Charles George, MA (I); Industri-plex, MA (I); Old Springfield
Landfill, VT (I); Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Winthrop
Landfill-EDD, ME (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II); Bog Creek Farm, NJ
(II)*; Bridgeport, NJ (II); Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II)*; Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Clothier
Disposal,NY (II); Combe Fill North Landfill, NJ (II); Combe Fill South Landfill, NJ (II); DeRewal
Chemical, NJ (II); D'Imperio Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ
(II); Goose Farm, NJ (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Hyde Park-EDO,
NY (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Lang Property, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill
(9/30/85), NJ (II)*; Lipari Landfill (7/11/88), NJ (II)*; Love Canal, NY (II); Love Canal/93rd Street
School, NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Sinclair Refinery, NY (II); Blosenski Landfill,
PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III);
Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Havertown PCP, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson Road,
PA (III)*; Kane & Lombard, MD (III); McAdoo-IRM, PA (III); McAdoo Associates, PA (III)*;
Moyer Landfill, PA (III); Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); Strasburg Landfill, PA (III); Taylor
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
318
-------
PRIMARY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES DETECTED
Toluene (continued)
Borough, PA (III); Tybouts Corner, DE (III); A. L. Taylor, KY (IV); Airco, KY (IV); American
Creosote, FL (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL
(IV); Distler Brickyard, KY (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Hipps
Road Landfill, FL (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); Newport Dump Site, KY (IV); Newsome
Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI
(V); Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); FMC Corporation, MN
(V); Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V);
Kysor Industrial, MI (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); New Brighton (TCAAP), MN
(V)*; New Lyme, OH (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*;
Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Oak Grove Landfill, MN (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V);
Republic Steel Quarry, OH (V); Seymour, IN (V); South Andover, MN (V); Summit National, OH
(V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); Verona Well Field, MI (V)*; Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI); Industrial
Waste Control, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Sheridan
Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sikes Disposal Pits, TX (VI); South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); Triangle
Chem., TX (VI); Big River Sand, KS (VII); Chemplex, IA (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA
(VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Ellisville, MO (VII); Todtz, Lawrence Farm, IA (VII);
Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA
(IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ; Operating Industries, CA (IX);
Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries (09/30/88), CA (IX)*; Raytheon, CA
(IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X);
Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X); Western Processing,
WA(X)*
Xylenes
Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*; Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II)*; Byron
Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Clothier DisposaLNY (II); Ewan
Property, NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); SMS Instruments,
NY (II); Henderson Road, PA (III)*; Strasburg Landfill, PA (III); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Cross
Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Kysor Industrial, MI (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V);
Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Chemplex, IA (VII); Doepke
Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Kern-Pest Laboratory, MO (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII);
Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); Intel
(Mountain View), CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Purity
Oil Sales, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX)
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Air
Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Landfill & Resource Recovery, RI (I); McKin-IRM, ME
(I); Sylvester, NH (I); Asbestos Dump, NJ (II); Combe FUI South Landfill, NJ (II); Diamond Alkali,
NJ (II); GEMS Landfill, NJ (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill
(7/11/88), NJ (II)*; Love Canal, NY (II); Old Bethpage, NY (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III);
Heleva Landfill, PA (III); Lansdowne Radiation, PA (III)*; Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds, VA
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
319
-------
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Air (continued)
(III); Taylor Borough, PA (IE); Wade, PA (III); Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV); Berlin &
Farro, MI (V); Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Johns-Manville, IL
(V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Outboard Marine, IL (V); Verona Well Field-IRM, MI
(V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Anaconda Smelter/Mill Creek, MT (VIII); Denver Radium
H, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium HI, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/12th & Quivas, CO (VIII)*;
Denver Radium/Open Space, CO (VIII)*; Mountain View/Globe, AZ (IX); Operating Industries
(09/30/88), CA (IX)*; San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos, CA (IX); South
Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX)*; Taputimu Farm, AS (DC); South Tacoma, WA (X)
Debris
Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Old Springfield
Landfill, VT (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); Brewster Well Field, NY (II);
Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Chemical Control, NJ (II)*; Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*;
GE Wiring Devices, PR (II); Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II); Love Canal, NY (II)*; Marathon Battery
(9/30/88), NY (II)*; Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ (II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ (II); Williams
Property, NJ (II); Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Delaware Sand and
Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III)*; Fike Chemical,
WV (IE); Havertown PCP, PA (III); Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA
(III)*; Kane & Lombard, MD (III); MW Manufacturing, PA (III); Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking, PA
(III); Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE
(III); Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV); American Creosote Works, TN (IV); Amnicola
Dump, TN (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimberling Battery, FL (IV);
Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Ionia City Landfill,
MI (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*; Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V);
Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Pristine, OH (V); Summit National, OH (V); Waste Disposal
Engineering, MN (V); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Dixie Oil, TX (VI); Odessa
Chromium I, TX (VI)*; Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI);
Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII); Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII); Syntex Verona, MO (VII);
Denver Radium HI, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/12th & Quivas, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Card
Property, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Open Space, CO (VIII)*; Monticello Vicinity Properties, UT
(VIII); Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX);
Monticello Vicinity Properties, UT (VIII); Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); South Bay Asbestos
Area, CA (IX)*; Frontier Hard Chrome (12/30/87), WA (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X)
Ground Water
Auburn Road, NH (I); Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I); Beacon Heights,
CT (I); Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Cannon/Plymouth, MA (I); Charles George, MA (I); Charles
George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Hocomonco
Pond, MA (I); Industri-plex, MA (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering Well
Field, CT (I); Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*; Laurel Park, CT (I); McKin-IRM, ME (I);
Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Nyanza Chemical, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT
(I); Ottati & Goss/ Great Lakes, NH (I); Picillo Farm, RI (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I);
Re-Solve, MA (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME
(I)*; South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Sylvester, NH (I); Tinkham
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
320
-------
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Ground Water (continued)
Garage, NH (I); Western Sand & Gravel, RI (I); Winthrop Landffll-EDD, ME (I); Wells G&H, MA
(I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); American Thermostat, NY (II); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II); Bog Creek
Farm, NJ (II)*; Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Bridgeport, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II); Byron
Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II)*; Chemical
Control, NJ (II); Chemical Control, NJ (II)*; Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Combe Fill North Landfill, NJ
(II); Combe Fill South Landfill, NJ (II); DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Diamond Alkali, NJ (II);
D'Imperio Property, NJ (II); Endicott Village Well Field, NY (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan
Property, NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); Florence Landfill, NJ (II); Friedman Property,
NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Moreau, NY (II); GEMS Landfill, NJ (II); GE Wiring
Devices, PR (II); Goose Farm, NJ (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Hyde
Park-EDD, NY (II); Katonah Municipal Well, NY (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II);
Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Krysowaty Farm, NJ (II); Lang Property, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill, NJ (II);
Lipari Landfill (9/30/85), NJ (II)*; Lipari Landfill (7/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II);
Marathon Battery (9/30/88), NY (II)*; Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II); Montgomery Township, NJ
(II); Montgomery Township Housing, NJ (II)*; Old Bethpage, NY (II); Clean Well Field, NY (II);
PAS Oswego, NY (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Pijak Farm, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill,
NY (II); Preferred Plating, NY (II); Price Landfill, NJ (II); Price Landfill, NJ (II)*; Reich Farm, NJ
(II); Renora, Inc., NJ (II); Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY (II); Rockaway Borough Wellfield, NJ (II);
Rocky Hill, NJ (II); Sharkey Landfill, NJ (II); Sinclair Refinery, NY (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II);
Spence Farm, NJ (II); Suffern Village Well Field, NY (II); Swope Oil, NJ (II); Syncon Resins, NJ
(II); Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Vega Alta, PR (II); Vestal,
NY (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ (II);
Williams Property, NJ (II); Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III); Avtex Fibers,
VA (III); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Bendix, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III);
Blosenski Landfill, PA (III); Bruin Lagoon, PA (III); Bruin Lagoon, PA (III)*; Chisman Creek, VA
(III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE
(III); Douglassville, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal(Amendment), PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA
(III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Fischer & Porter, PA (III); Harvey-Knott, DE (III); Heleva
Landfill, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III)*; Industrial Lane, PA (III);
Kane & Lombard, MD (III); Kimberton, PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III)*; Limestone Road, MD (III);
Matthews Electroplating, VA (III); McAdoo-IRM, PA (III); McAdoo Associates, PA (III)*;
Middletown Airfield, PA (III); Millcreek, PA (III); Moyer Landfill, PA (III); New Castle Spill, DE
(III); Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III); Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds, VA (HI); Sand, Gravel &
Stone, MD (III); Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); Strasburg Landfill, PA (III); Tybouts Corner,
DE (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III)*; Wade, PA (III); Westline, PA (III);
Westline, PA (III)*; West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III); West Virginia Ordnance, WV (III)*;
Wildcat Landfill, DE (III); Airco, KY (IV); Alpha Chemical, FL (IV); American Creosote, FL (IV);
Biscayne Aquifer Sites, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Carolawn, SC (IV);
Celanese Fibers Operations, NC (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV);
Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); Coleman Evans, FL (IV); Davie Landfill, FL (IV); Distler Brickyard, KY (IV);
Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Hipps Road Landfill, FL (IV);
Hollingsworth, FL (IV); Independent Nail, SC (IV)*; Kassouf-Kimberling Battery, FL (IV); Miami
Drum Services, FL (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); Newport Dump Site, KY (IV); Pepper's
Steel-EDD, FL (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); Sapp Battery, FL (IV); SCRDI Dixiana, SC
(IV); Sodyeco, NC (IV); Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne
Plant), AL (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Varsol Spill Site, FL (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV);
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
321
-------
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Ground Water (continued)
Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); A&F Materials-EDD, IL (V)*; A&F
Materials-IRM, IL (V); Acme Solvents, IL (V); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Arcanum Iron &
Metal, OH (V); Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V); Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Big D Campground, OH
(V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; Byron
Salvage Yard (6/30/89), IL (V)*; Charlevoix, MI (V); Charlevoix, MI (V)*; Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH
(V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL
(V); Eau Claire-IRM, WI (V); Eau Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; FMC Corporation, MN
(V)*; Forest Waste, MI (V)*; Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V);
Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V);
Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Johns-Manville, IL (V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*;
Kysor Industrial, MI (V); Lake Sandy Jo, IN (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*; Laskin/Poplar
Oil, OH (V); LeHillier/Mankato, MN (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Long Prairie, MN (V); Main
Street Well Field, IN (V); Marion/Bragg Landfill, IN (V); Miami County Incinerator, OH (V);
MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); New Brighton/St.
Anthony-IRM, MN (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills/St. Anthony, MN (V)*; New Brighton-Interim
Water Treatment, MN (V)*; New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; New Brighton-Water Supply
System, MN (V)*; New Lyme, OH (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN
(V)*; Northernaire, MI (V); Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Northside Sanitary
Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Novaco Industries, MI (V);
Oak Grove Landfill, MN (V); Old Mill, OH (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Outboard
Marine Corp., IL (V); Pristine, OH (V); Reilly Tar, MN (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical, MN (V)*;
Rose Township, MI (V); Schmalz Dump, WI (V)*; Seymour, IN (V); Seymour, IN (V)*; South
Andover, MN (V); Summit National, OH (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V);
Verona Well Field-IRM, MI (V); Verona Well Field, MI (V)*; Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Waste
Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL
(V)*; Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V)*; Windom Dump, MN (V);
Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI); Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI)*; Bayou Sorrel, LA (VI); Bio-Ecology Systems,
TX (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cecil Lindsey, AR (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Dixie Oil, TX
(VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Geneva Industries, TX (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Highlands
Acid Pit, TX (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI)*; Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI);
Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Mid-South Wood, AR (VI); MOTCO, TX (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*;
North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI)*;
Odessa Chromium II, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium II, TX (VI)*; Old Inger, LA (VI); Old Midland
Products, AR (VI); Sand Springs, OK (VI)*; Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI)*; Sikes Disposal
Pits, TX (VI); Sol Lynn (09/23/88), TX (VI)*; South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South Valley-IRM,
NM (VI); South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*; South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; South
Valley/SJ-6, NM (VI)*; Tar Creek, OK (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI); United Nuclear, NM
(VI); Aidex-IRM, IA (VII); Aidex, IA (VII)*; Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII)*; Big River Sand, KS
(VII); Cherokee County/Galena, KS (VII); Chemplex, IA (VII); Conservation Chemical, MO (VII);
Deere, John, Dubuque Works, LA (VII); Des Moines TCE, LA (VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday),
KS (VII); Findett, MO (VTI); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII); Kern-Pest Laboratory, MO
(VII); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Todtz, Lawrence Farm, LA (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, LA
(VII); Arsenic Trioxide, ND (VIII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); California Gulch, CO
(VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water,
MT (VIII)*; Marshall Landfill, CO (VIII); Milltown-S, MT (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO
(VIII); Smuggler Mountain, CO (VIII); Union Pacific, WY (VIII); Beckman Instruments/Porterville,
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
322
-------
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Ground Water (continued)
CA (IX); Celtor Chemical Works, CA (IX); Del Norte, CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View),
CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); IBM (San Jose), CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash,
AZ (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfleld Airport,
AZ (IX); Litchfleld Airport (9/26/89), AZ; Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA (IX); McColl, CA (IX);
MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX); Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA
(IX); Sacramento Army Depot, CA (IX); San Fernando Area I, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley
(Area 1), CA (IX); San Gabriel Area I, CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1,2 & 4), CA (IX)*;
Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits-IRM, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA
(IX)*; Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX); Colbert Landfill, WA (X); Commencement
Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Martin Marietta, OR (X);
Northside Landfill, WA (X); Ponders Corner-IRM, WA (X); Ponders Corner, WA (X)*; Queen City
Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X); South Tacoma, WA (X); South Tacoma Channel-Well 12A, WA (X)*;
United Chrome, OR (X); Western Processing, WA (X); Western Processing, WA (X)*
Sediments (Creek/River/Stream)
Auburn Road, NH (I); Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Cannon/Plymouth, MA (I); Charles George
Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Hocomonco Pond, MA (I); Laurel Park, CT
(I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Nyanza Chemical, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Ottati & Goss/Great
Lakes, NH (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*;
South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkham Garage, NH (I); W.R.
Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II)*; Brewster Well
Field, NY (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Chemical Control, NJ (II)*;
Combe Fill South Landfill, NJ (II); GEMS Landfill, NJ (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Hudson
River, NY (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (7/11/88), NJ (II)*; Love Canal, NY (II);
Love Canal, NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Marathon Battery (9/30/88), NY (II)*;
Marathon Battery (9/29/89), NY (II)*; Pijak Farm, NJ (II); Syncon Resins, NJ (II); Vineland
Chemical, NJ (II); Wide Beach, NY (II); York Oil, NY (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Army
Creek Landfill, DE (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); Bruin Lagoon, PA (III)*; Chisman Creek, VA
(III); Douglassville, PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Harvey-Knott, DE (III); Henderson Road,
PA (III); L.A. Clarke & Son, VA (III); Leetown Pesticide, WV (III); Limestone Road, MD (III);
Millcreek, PA (III); New Castle Steel DE (III); Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III); Ordnance
Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*; Saltville Waste Disposal
Ponds, VA (III); Sand, Gravel & Stone, MD (III); Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); Tyson's
Dump, PA (III); Westline, PA (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III); West Virginia
Ordnance, WV (III)*; Airco, KY (IV); American Creosote, FL (IV); Brown Wood Preserving, FL
(IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Chemtronics, NC
(IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Coleman Evans, FL (IV); Flowood, MS (IV); Goodrich,
B.F., KY (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); Newport Dump Site, KY (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old
Reichhold, MS (IV); Pepper's Steel-EDD, FL (IV); Sapp Battery, FL (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV);
Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Arcanum Iron & Metal, OH (V);
Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Coshocton
Landfill, OH (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Fields Brook, OH (V); Forest Waste, MI (V)*;
Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Lake Sandy Jo, IN (V);
LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*; MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump,
IN (V)*; Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
323
-------
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Sediments (continued)
(V); Outboard Marine Corp., EL (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Pristine, OH (V);
Republic Steel Quarry, OH (V); Schmalz Dump, WI (V); Seymour, IN (V); Summit National, OH
(V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V);
Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V); Wedzeb Enterprises, IN (V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM
(VI); Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI); Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI); Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI)*; Cecil
Lindsey, AR (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Sediments (Creek/River/Geneva Industries, TX (VI);
Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Motco, TX
(VI)*; North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Old Midland Products, AR (VI); Sikes Disposal Pits, TX
(VI); South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII); Kern-Pest
Laboratory, MO (VII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); California Gulch, CO (VIII);
Denver Radium/Card Property, CO (VIII)*; Milltown, MT (VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII);
Iron Mountain Mine, CA (EX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore (9/30/89),
WA (X); Gould, OR (X); Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X); Western Processing, WA (X)
Sludge
Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Hocomonco Pond, MA (I); Industri-plex, MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA
(I); Nyanza Chemical, MA (I); Tinkham Garage, NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); W.R. Grace (Acton
Plant), MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Bridgeport, NJ (II);
Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Florence Landfill, NJ (II); GE Moreau, NY (II); North Sea
Municipal Landfill, NY (II); Swope Oil, NJ (II); Bruin Lagoon, PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA
(III)*; Enterprise Avenue, PA (III); Fike Chemical, WV (III); Lackawanna Refuse Site, PA (III);
McAdoo Associates, PA (III)*; American Creosote, FL (IV); American Creosote Works, TN (IV);
Brown Wood Preserving, FL (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Davie Landfill, FL (IV);
Pioneer Sand, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Arrowhead Refinery, MN
(V); Berlin & Farro, MI (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Forest Waste IRM, MI (V); Forest
Waste-IRM, MI (V)*; Laskin Poplar Oil, OH (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V)*; Liquid Disposal, MI
(V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); Newlyme, OH (V); Bio-Ecology
Systems, TX (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Gurley
Pit, AR (VI); Gurley Pitt-Edd, AK (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI); Mid-South Wood, AK (VI);
Motco, TX (VI); Old Inger, LA (VI); Old Midland Products, AR (VI); Pesses Chemical, TX (VI);
Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sikes Disposal Pitts, TX (VI); Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII);
Des Moines TCE, LA (VII); Ellisville, MO (VII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); McColl, CA
(IX); Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X)
Soil
Auburn Road, NH (I); Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I); Beacon Heights,
CT (I); Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Cannon/Plymouth, MA (I); Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I);
Groveland Wells, MA (I); Hocomonco Pond, MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Industri-plex, MA
(I); Keefe Environmental, NH (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering Well
Field, CT (I)*; Laurel Park, CT (I); McKin-IRM, ME (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Nyanza
Chemical, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Ottati & Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Picillo Farm, RI (I);
Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I);
South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkham Garage, NH (I);
Western Sand & Gravel, RI (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I);
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
324
-------
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Soil (continued)
Asbestos Dump, NJ (II); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II); Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Bridgeport, NJ
(II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Chemical Control,
NJ (II); Chemical Control, NJ (II)*; Clothier Disposal,NY (II); Combe Fill North Landfill, NJ (II);
DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); D'Imperio Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property,
NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; Florence Landfill, NJ (II); FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); Fulton
Terminals, NY (II); GE Moreau, NY (II); GEMS Landfill, NJ (II); GE Wiring Devices, PR (II);
Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II); Goose Farm, NJ (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Hyde Park-EDO, NY
(II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Krysowaty Farm, NJ (II); Lang Property, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill, NJ
(II); Lipari Landfill (7/11/88), NJ (II)*; ; Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II); Love Canal, NY (II); Love
Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Marathon Battery (9/30/88),
NY (II)*; Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II); Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ (II); Nascolite, NJ (II);
North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY (II); PAS Oswego, NY (II); Pepe Field, NJ (II); Pijak Farm, NJ
(II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Price Landfill, NJ (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Renora Inc.,
NJ (II); Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY (II); Sharkey Landfill, NJ (II); Sinclair Refinery, NY (II);
SMS Instruments, NY (II); Spence Farm, NJ (II); Swope Oil, NJ (II); Syncon Resins, NJ (II);
Vestal, NY (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ (II); Wide Beach, NY (II);
Williams Property, NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA
(III); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III); Bendix, PA (III); Blosenski Landfill, PA (III); Bruin Lagoon,
PA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill,
PA (III); Douglassville, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Drake Chemical,
PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Harvey-Knott, DE (III); Enterprise Avenue, PA (III); Hebelka
Auto Salvage Yard, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III)*; Kane & Lombard, MD (III); Lackawanna
Refuse Site, PA (III); L.A. Clarke & Son, VA (III); Lansdowne Radiation, PA, (III); Lansdowne
Radiation, PA (III)*; Leetown Pesticide, WV (III); Lehigh Electric, PA (III); Matthews
Electroplating, VA (III); McAdoo-IRM, PA (III); McAdoo Associates, PA (III)*; Millcreek, PA
(III); MW Manufacturing, PA (III); Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III); Ordnance Works Disposal
Areas (Amendment), WV (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III); Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III); Saltville
Waste Disposal Ponds, VA (III); Sand, Gravel & Stone, MD (III); Southern Maryland Wood, MD
(III); Taylor Borough, PA (III); Tybouts Corner, DE (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III); Tyson's Dump
(Amendment), PA (III); Wade, PA (III); Westline, PA (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV
(III); West Virginia Ordnance, WV (III)*; Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV); Airco, KY (IV);
American Creosote, FL (IV); American Creosote Works, FL (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV);
Brown Wood Preserving, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers,
NC (IV)*; Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Coleman Evans, FL (IV);
Flowood, MS (IV); Gallaway Ponds, TN (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY
(IV); Hipps Road Landfill, FL (IV); Hollingsworth, FL (IV); Kassouf-Kimberling Battery, FL (IV);
Miami Drum Services, FL (IV); Mowbray Engineering, AL (IV); Newport Dump Site, KY (IV);
Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); Pepper's Steel-EDD, FL (IV); Pioneer Sand, FL (IV);
Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); Sapp Battery, FL (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Sodyeco, NC (IV);
Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV); Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL
(IV); A&F Materials-IRM, IL (V); A&F Materials-EDD, IL (V)*; Acme Solvents, IL (V);
Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Arcanum Iron & Metal, OH (V);
Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V); Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Berlin &
Farro, MI (V); Big D Campground, OH (V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI
(V); Byron/Johnson Salvage Yard, IL (V); Cemetery Dump, MI (V); Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V);
Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); Cross Bros., IL (V); Cross Brothers Pail
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
325
-------
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Soil (continued)
(Pembroke), IL (V); Distler Brickyard, KY (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Forest Waste-IRM,
MI (V); Forest Waste, MI (V)*; Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V);
Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Ionia City Landfill, MI (V);
Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Kysor Industrial, MI (V); Lake Sandy Jo, IN (V); LaSalle
Electrical, IL (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*; Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Laskin/Poplar
Oil, OH (V)*; Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Main Street Wellfield, IN (V); Marion/Bragg Landfill, IN
(V); Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Mid-State
Disposal, WI (V); Morris Arsenic, MN (V); New Lyme, OH (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills
(TCAAP), MN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Northernaire, MI (V); Northside Sanitary
Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oak Grove Landfill, MN
(V); Old Mill, OH (V); Outboard Marine Corp., IL (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V);
Pristine, OH (V); Reilly Tar, MN (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical, MN (V)*; Republic Steel Quarry,
OH (V); Rose Township, MI (V); Schmalz Dump, WI (V); Schmalz Dump, WI (V)*; Seymour, IN
(V); Seymour, IN (V)*; Summit National, OH (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); U.S. Aviex, MI
(V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Verona Well Field, MI (V)*; Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V);
Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Wausau Water Supply, WI (V)*; Windom Dump, MN (V);
Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI); Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI);
Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI)*; Bayou Sorrel, LA (VI); Bio-Ecology Systems, TX (VI); Brio Refining,
TX (VI); Cecil Lindsey, AR (VI); Crystal City, TX (VI); Dixie Oil, TX (VI); French Limited, TX
(VI); Geneva Industries, TX (VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Highlands Acid
Pit, TX (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); MOTCO, TX (VI);
Motco, TX (VI)*; North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Old Inger, LA (VI); Old Midland Products, AR
(VI); Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); Petro-Chemical Systems, TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX
(VI); Sikes Disposal Pits, TX (VI); Sol Lynn (03/25/88), TX (VI); South Calvacade Street, TX (VI);
South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; Triangle Chem., TX (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI); United
Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Aidex-IRM, IA (VII); Aidex, LA (VII)*; Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII)*; Big
River Sand, KS (VII); Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Des Moines TCE, LA (VII); Doepke
Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Ellisville, MO (VII); Ellisville Site Area, MO (VII)*; Findett, MO
(VII); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII); Hastings Ground Water, NE (VII);,Hastings
Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*;
Kern-Pest Laboratory, MO (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII);
Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*; Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII); Syntex Verona, MO
(VII); Times Beach, MO (VII); Times Beach, MO (VII)*; Vogel Paint & Wax, LA (VII); Broderick
Wood Products, CO (VHI); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); Denver Radium III, CO
(VIII)*; Denver Radium/llth & Umatilla, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/12th & Quivas, CO (VIII)*;
Denver Radium/Card Property, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Open Space, CO (Vlll)*; Denver
Radium/ROBCO, CO (VIII)*; Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*;
Milltown, MT (Vni); Milltown-S, MT (VIII); Monticello Vicinity Properties, UT (VIII); Sand Creek
Industrial, CO (VIII); Smuggler Mountain, CO (VIII); Union Pacific, WY (VIII); Woodbury
Chemical, CO (VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII)*; Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Beckman
Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX); Celtor Chemical Works, CA (IX); Celtor Chemical, CA (IX)*;
Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Del Norte, CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX);
Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); IBM (San Jose), CA (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA
(IX); Jibboom Junkyard, CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); McColl, CA (IX); MGM Brakes, CA
(DC); Mountain View/Globe, AZ (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); Selma
Pressure Treating, CA (DC); South Bay Asbestos, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX)*;
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
326
-------
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Soil (continued)
Stringfellow Acid Pits-IRM, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX)*; Taputimu Farm, AS (IX);
Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome (12/30/87), WA (X); Gould, OR
(X); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northwest Transformer, WA (X); Pacific Hide and Fur, ID (X);
Ponders Coraer-IRM, WA (X); Ponders Corner, WA (X)*; South Tacoma, WA (X); South Tacoma
Channel-Well 12A, WA (X)*; United Chrome, OR (X); Western Processing, WA (X); Western
Processing, WA (X)*
Surface Water
Auburn Road, NH (I); Beacon Heights, CT (I); Cannon/Plymouth, MA (I); Hocomonco Pond, MA
(I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Laurel Park, CT (I); McKin-IRM, ME (I); Nyanza
Chemical, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Ottati & Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Re-Solve, MA (I); Rose
Disposal Pit, MA (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Sylvester, NH (I); Tinkham Garage, NH (I);
Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Caldwell Trucking,
NJ (II); Chemical Insecticide, NJ (II); Combe Fill South Landfill, NJ (II); GE Moreau, NY (II);
GEMS Landfill, NJ (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Hudson River, NY (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II);
Krysowaty Farm, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (7/11/88), NJ (II)*; Lone Pine
Landfill, NJ (II); Love Canal, NY (II); Marathon Battery, NY (II); Pijak Farm, NJ (II); Price
Landfill, NJ (II)*; Sharkey Landfill, NJ (II); Sinclair Refinery, NY (II); York Oil, NY (II); Ambler
Asbestos Piles, PA (HI); Ambler Asbestos Piles (9/29/89), PA (III); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III);
Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Bruin Lagoon, PA (III); Chisman Creek, VA (III); Chisman Creek, VA
(III)*; Douglassville, PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Enterprise
Avenue, PA (III); Fike Chemical, WV (III); Fischer & Porter PA (III); Harvey-Knott, DE (III);
Havertown PCP, PA (III); Heleva Landfill, PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III)*; Lackawanna Refuse Site,
PA (III); Limestone Road, MD (III); McAdoo Associates, PA (III)*; Millcreek, PA (III); Moyer
Landfill, PA (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*; Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III); Saltville Waste
Disposal Ponds, VA (III); Sand, Gravel & Stone, MD Surface Water (III); Southern Maryland
Wood, MD (III); Taylor Borough, PA (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III); Westline, PA (III); West
Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Chemtronics
(Amendment), NC (IV); Gallaway Ponds, TN (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (VI); National Starch,
NC (IV); Pioneer Sand, FL (IV); Sapp Battery, FL (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Whitehouse
Waste Oil Pits, FL (IV); A&F Materials-EDD, IL (V); Arcanum Iron & Metal, OH (V); Arrowhead
Refinery, MN (V); Berlin & Farro, MI (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH
(V); Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Mid-State
Disposal, WI (V); Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical
Corporation, IN (V); Oak Grove Landfill, MN (V); Old Mill, OH (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical,
MI (V); Outboard Marine Corp., IL (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Pristine, OH (V);
Reilly Tar, MN (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical, MN (V)*; Republic Steel Quarry, OH (V); Summit
National, OH (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V); Atchison/Santa Fe
(Clovis), NM (VI); Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI)*; Bio-Ecology Systems, TX (VI); Cecil Lindsey, AR
(VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Geneva Industries, TX (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI)*; Mid-South
Wood, AR (VI); MOTCO, TX (VI); Old Inger, LA (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI);
Sikes Disposal Pits, TX (VI); Tar Creek, OK (VI); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII);
California Gulch, CO (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO
(VIII)*; Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII); Marshall Landfill, CO (VIII); Smuggler Mountain, CO
(VIII); Celtor Chemical Works, CA (IX); Celtor Chemical, CA (IX)*; Iron Mountain Mine, CA
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
327
-------
CONTAMINATED MEDIA
Surface Water (continued)
(IX); McColl, CA (DC); Stringfellow Acid Pits-IRM, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX)*;
Western Processing, WA (X)*
PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVERONMENTAL THREATS
Direct Contact
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Charles
George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I);
Industri-plex, MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*;
Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*; Laurel Park, CT (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor, ME
(I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I); Rose
Disposal Pit, MA (I); Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I);
Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Winthrop Landfill-EDD, ME (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); W.R. Grace
(Acton Plant), MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); American Thermostat, NY (II); Brewster Well
Field, NY (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Chemical Insecticide, NJ
(II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Diamond
Alkali, NJ (II); Evran Property, NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II);
GE Wiring Devices, PR (II); Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II); Hudson River, NY (II); Katonah
Municipal Well, NY (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (7/11/88), NJ (II)*; Love Canal,
NY (II); Love Canal, NY (II)*; Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel,
NY (II); Marathon Battery (9/30/88), NY (II)*; Marathon Battery (9/29/89), NY (II)*;
Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ (II); Montgomery Township, NJ (II); Nascolite, NJ (II); North
Sea Municipal Landfill, NY (II); Pepe Field, NJ (II); Pijak Farm, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill,
NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY (II); Rocky Hill,
NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Spence Farm, NJ (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Vega
Alta, PR (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ (II);
Williams Property, NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA
(III); Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Bendix, PA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA
(III); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal,
PA (HI)*; Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Fike Chemical, WV (III); Havertown PCP, PA (III);
Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III)*; Kane & Lombard, MD (III); Kimberton,
PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III)*; L.A Clarke & Son, VA (III); Middletown Airfield, PA (III); MW
Manufacturing, PA (III); New Castle Spill, DE (III); New Castle Steel DE (III); Ordnance Works
Disposal, WV (III); Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA
(III)*; Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking, PA (III); Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); Strasburg
Landfill, PA (III); Tyson's Dump (Amendment), PA (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III)*; West Virginia
Ordnance Works, WV (III); West Virginia Ordnance, WV (III)*; Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III);
Wildcat Landfill, DE (III); Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV); Airco, KY (IV); American
Creosote Works, TN (IV); American Creosote Works, FL (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Brown
Wood Preserving, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Carolawn, SC (IV); Celanese
Fibers Operations, NC (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics
(Amendment), NC (IV); Flowood, MS (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV);
Kassouf-Kimberling Battery, FL (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); National Starch,
NC (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Sodeyco, NC (IV); Stauffer
Chemical (Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Wamchem, SC
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
328
-------
PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL THREATS
Direct Contact (continued)
(IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Belvidere
Landfill, IL (V); Big D Campground, OH (V);Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Coshocton Landfill, OH
(V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); FMC Corporation, MN (V)*; Forest Waste-IRM, MI (V);
Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V);
Hedblum Industries, MI (V); IMC Terre Haute, IN (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V); Ionia
City Landfill, MI (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Kysor
Industrial, MI (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*; Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Liquid Disposal,
MI (V); Marion/Bragg Landfill, IN (V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Miami County Incinerator,
OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN
(V); New Brighton (TCAAP); MN (V)*; NL/Taracorp/Golden Auto Parts, MN (V)*; Ninth Avenue
Dump, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Northside Sanitary
Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Ott/Story/Cordova
Chemical, MI (V); Pristine, OH (V); Rose Township, MI (V); Schmalz Dump, WI (V); Seymour, IN
(V)*; Summit National, OH (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); Velsicol
Chemical, IL (V); Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Wauconda
Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V)*; Wedzeb
Enterprises, IN (V); Windom Dump, MN (V); Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI); Bayou Bonfouca,
LA (VI)*; Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Crystal City Airport, TX (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Gurley
Pit, AR (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX
(VI); North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium II, TX
(VI)*; Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); Petro-Chemical Systems, TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX
(VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI)*; Sol Lynn (03/25/88), TX (VI); Sol Lynn (09/23/88), TX
(VI)*; South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); United Nuclear, NM (VI); Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII);
Chemplex, IA (VII); Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Doepke
Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Findett, MO (VII); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII); Hastings
Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*; Kern-Pest Laboratory, MO (VII); Midwest
Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*; Shenandoah
Stables, MO (VII); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Syntex Verona, MO (VII); Times Beach, MO
(VII)*; Todtz, Lawrence Farm, IA (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Anaconda Smelter/Mill
Creek, MT (VIII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII);
Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium III, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/llth &
Umatilla, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/12th & Quivas, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Open Space, CO
(VIII)*; Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Monticello Vicinity Properties, UT (VIII); Sand Creek
Industrial, CO (VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII)*; Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX);
Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); IBM (San
Jose), CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville
Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Litchfield Airport (9/26/89), AZ (IX); MGM Brakes,
CA (IX); Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); Sacramento Army Depot, CA (IX); San
Fernando Area I, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2
& 4), CA (IX)*; Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX)*;
Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX); Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX); Commencement
Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore
(9/30/89), WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Frontier Hard Chrome (12/30/87),
WA (X); Gould, OR (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northside Landfill, WA (X); Northwest
Transformer, WA (X); Pacific Hide and Fur, ID (X)
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
329
-------
PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL THREATS
Public Exposure
Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Laurel Park, CT (I); O'Connor, ME (I);
Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Asbestos Dump, NJ (II); Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II);
Chemical Control, NJ (II)*; Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill
(7/11/88), NJ (II)*; Love Canal, NY (II); Love Canal, NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II);
Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II); Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ (II); Montgomery Township
Housing, NJ (II)*; Nascolite, NJ (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Aladdin Plating, PA (III);
Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Delaware Sand and
Gravel, DE (III); Fike Chemical, WV (III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Lansdowne Radiation, PA
(III); Mfflcreek, PA (III); MW Manufacturing, PA (III); Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III);
Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds, VA (III); West Virginia Ordnance, WV (III)*; Cape Fear Wood
Preserving, NC (TV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; National Starch, NC (IV); Perdido
Groundwater, AL (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); Sodeyco, NC (IV); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH
(V)*; Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; Eau Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; Galesburg/Koppers,
IL (V); IMC Terre Haute, IN (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V);
Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Miami County Incinerator, OH (V);
Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oak
Grove Landfill, MN (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Rose Township, MI (V);
Seymour, IN (V)*5 Verona Well Field-IRM, MI (V); Crystal City Airport, TX (VI); Sheridan
Disposal Services, TX (VI); South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII);
Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII);
Hastings Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*; Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*;
Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII); Times Beach, MO (VII)*; California Gulch, CO (VIII); Central
City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium III, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/llth & Umatilla,
CO (VIII); Denver Radium/12th & Quivas, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Card Property, CO (VIII)*;
Denver Radium/Open Space, CO (VIII)*; Litchfield Airport, AZ (DC); McColl, CA (IX); San
Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (DC); San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA (IX)*; South Bay
Asbestos, CA (IX); Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA
(X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X)
REMEDY SELECTION
ARAR Waiver
Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II)*; Picatinny
Arsenal, NJ (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Havertown PCP, PA (III); Strasburg Landfill, PA
(III); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*
Institutional Controls
Beacon Heights, CT (I); Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Kellogg-Deering
Well Field, CT (I)*; Laurel Park, CT (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I);
Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Saco Tannery Waste
Pits, ME (I)*; South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Wells G&H, MA
(I); Winthrop Landfill-EDD, ME (I); Asbestos Dump, NJ (II); Clothier Disposal, NY (II); DeRewal
Chemical, NJ (II); Friedman Property, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Moreau, NY (II);
Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Marathon
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
330
-------
REMEDY SELECTION
Institutional Controls (continued)
Battery, NY (II); Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ (II); North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY (II);
Clean Well Field, NY (II); Pepe Field, NJ (II); Preferred Plating, NY (II); Rocky Hill, NJ (II);
Waldick Aerospace, NJ (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Bally
Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); Chisman Creek, VA (III); Craig
Farm Drum, PA (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson Road,
PA (III)*; Industrial Lane, PA (III); L.A. Clarke & Son, VA (III); New Castle Spill, DE (III);
Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III); Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds, VA (III);
Tybouts Corner, DE (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III); Westline, PA (III)*; West
Virginia Ordnance, WV (III)*; Wildcat Landfill, DE (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE (III)*; Alrco, KY
(IV); American Creosote Works, FL (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Biscayne Aquifer Sites, FL
(IV); Carolawn, SC (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Gallaway
Ponds, TN (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Hipps Road Landfill, FL (IV); Newport Dump Site, KY
(IV); Pepper's Steel-EDD, FL (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); Sapp Battery, FL (IV); Tower
Chemical, FL (IV); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Arcanum Iron &
Metal, OH (V); Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V); Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Big D Campground, OH
(V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; Charlevoix, MI (V)*; Cliff/Dow Dump,
MI (V); Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); E.H. Schilling
Landfill, OH (V); FMC Corporation, MN (V)*; Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne
Reduction, IN (V); IMC Terre Haute, IN (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Ionia City
Landfill, MI (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); Lake Sandy Jo, IN (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V);
Marion/Bragg Landfill, IN (V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Miami County Incinerator, OH (V);
MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); Morris Arsenic, MN (V); Ninth
Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical
Corporation, IN (V); Oak Grove Landfill, MN (V); Old Mill, OH (V); Pristine, OH (V); Reilly Tar
& Chemical, MN (V)*; Seymour, IN (V)*; South Andover, MN (V); Summit National, OH (V);
United Scrap Lead, OH (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V);
Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI);
Dixie Oil, TX (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Mid-South
Wood Products; AR (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium II,
TX (VI); Old Inger, LA (VI); Sand Springs, OK (VI)*; Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI);
Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI)*; South Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); South Valley/SJ-6, NM
(VI)*; United Creosoting, TX (VI); Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Chemplex, IA (VII); Cherokee
County, KS (VII)*; Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Deer, John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII);
Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII);
Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*; Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Times Beach, MO (VII)*;
Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV); Arsenic Trioxide, ND (VIII); Burlington Northern
(Somers), MT (VIII); Denver Radium Site Streets, CO (VIII); Denver Radium/Open Space, CO
(VIII)*; Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Atlas Asbestos Mine,
CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Iron Mountain Mine, CA (IX); Purity Oil Sales, CA
(IX); South Bay Asbestos, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX)*; Commencement
Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore (9/30/89), WA (X); Commencement
Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Martin Marietta, OR (X);
Northside Landfill, WA (X); Pacific Hide and Fur, ID (X); Ponders Corner, WA (X)*; South
Tacoma Channel-Well 12A, WA (X)*; Western Processing, WA (X)*
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
331
-------
REMEDY SELECTION
Interim Remedy
Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Chemical Insecticide, NJ (II); Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); Glen Ridge
Radium, NJ (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ
(II); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III); Douglassville
Disposal, PA (III)*; Fike Chemical, WV (III); Kane & Lombard, MD (III); Kimberton, PA (III);
Middletown Airfield, PA (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III); Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds, VA (III);
Strasburg Landfill, PA (HI); Tyson's Dump, PA (III); Tyson's Dump (Amendment), PA (III);
Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III); New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; New Brighton/Arden Hills
(TCAAP), MN (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Cherokee County/Galena, KS (VII); Hastings
Ground Water, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings
Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*; Anaconda Smelter/Mill Creek, MT (VIII); California
Gulch, CO (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII)*;
Denver Radium III, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/11th & Umatilla, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/12th
& Quivas, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Open Space, CO (VIII)*; Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*;
Litchfield Airport, AZ (DC); Operating Industries, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA
(DC); San Fernando Area I, CA (DC); San Gabriel Area I, CA (DC); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX);
Gould, OR (X)
No Action Remedy
Beachwood/Berkeley Well, NJ (II); EEC Trucking, NY (II); Cooper Road, NJ (II); Friedman
Property, NJ (II); South Brunswick Landfill, NJ (II)*; Suffern Village Well Field, NY (II); Vineland
State School, NJ (II); Middletown Road, MD (III); New Castle Steel DE (III); Presque Isle, PA
(III); Reeser's Landfill, PA (III); Taylor Borough, PA (III)*; Voortman Farm, PA (III); Westline,
PA (III)*; Pijak Farm, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Price Landfill, NJ (II); Price
Landfill, NJ (II)*; Reich Farm, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY (II);
Rockaway Borough Wellfield, NJ (II); Rocky Hill, NJ (II); Sharkey Landfill, NJ (II); SMS
Instruments, NY (II); South Brunswick Landfill, NJ (II)*; Spence Farm, NJ (II); Syncon Resins, NJ
(II); Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ (II); Vega Alta, PR (II); Vestal, NY (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ
(II); Volney Landfill, NY (II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ (II); Williams Property, NJ (II); York Oil,
NY (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Ambler Asbestos Piles (9/29/89), PA (III); Army Creek
Landfill, DE (III); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Bendix, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit,
PA (III); Blosenski Landfill, PACiba-Geigy, AL (IV); Independent Nail, SC (IV)*;
Kassouf-Kimberling Battery, FL (IV); Tri-City Conservation, FL (IV); Varsol Spill, FL (IV); Adrian
Municipal Well Field, MN (V); Cemetery Dump, MI (V); IMC Terre Haute, IN (V); Morris
Arsenic, MN (V); NL/Taracorp/Golden Auto Parts, MN (V)*; Peterson Sand & Gravel, IL (V);
Poer Farm, IN (V); Whitehall Municipal Wells, MI (V); Cecil Lindsey, AR (VI); Gurley Pit, AR
(VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI)*; Homestake Mining, NM (VI); Sand Springs, OK (VI)*; South
Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*; Stewco, TX (VI); Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII)*; Big River
Sand, KS (VII); John's Sludge Pond, KS (VII); Ordot Landfill, GU (IX); Toftdahl Drum, WA (X)*
O&M
Auburn Road, NH (I); Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I); Baird &
McGuire, MA (I)*; Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland
Wells, MA (I); Industri-plex, MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH
(I)*; Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I); Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*; Laurel Park, CT (I);
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
332
-------
REMEDY SELECTION
O & M (continued)
Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Ottati & Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I);
Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I);
Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA
(I); Tinkham Garage, NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); Winthrop Landfill-EDD, ME (I); W.R. Grace
(Acton Plant), MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); Asbestos Dump, NJ (II); Bog Creek Farm, NJ
(II)*; Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Byron Barrel
& Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II)*; Chemical Insecticide,
NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Clothier Disposal,NY (II); Combe Fill North Landfill, NJ (II); Combe
Fill South Landfill, NJ (II); DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); D'Imperio
Property, NJ (II); Endicott Village Well Field, NY (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ
(II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); Florence Landfill, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE
Moreau, NY (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Hyde Park-EDO, NY (II); Katonah Municipal Well,
NY (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, KY (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Krysowaty Farm, NJ (II);
Lang Property, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (7/11/88), NJ (II)*; Love Canal, NY (II); Love Canal/93rd
Street School, NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Marathon Battery, NY (II); Marathon
Battery (9/30/88), NY (II)*; Marathon Battery (9/29/89), NY (II)*; Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II);
Montgomery Township Housing, NJ (II)*; North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY (II); Old Bethpage,
NY (II); PAS Oswego, NY (II); Pepe Field, NJ (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); (III); Bruin
Lagoon, PA (III); Bruin Lagoon, PA (III)*; Chisman Creek, VA (III); Chisman Creek, VA (III)*;
Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III); CryoChem, PA (III); Delaware Sand and
Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA
(III)*; Havertown PCP, PA (III); Heleva Landfill, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson
Road, PA (III)*; Kane & Lombard, MD (III); Kimberton, PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III)*; L.A.
Clarke & Son, VA (III); Lansdowne Radiation, PA (III)*; Limestone Road, MD (III); Matthews
Electroplating, VA (III); Middletown Airfield, PA (III); Millcreek, PA (III); Ordnance Works
Disposal, WV (III); Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III); Rhinehart Tire Fire,
VA (III); Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds, VA (HI); Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); Strasburg
Landfill, PA (III); Tybouts Corner Landfill, DE (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III); Tyson's Dump
(Amendment), PA (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III)*; West Virginia Ordnance Works, VA (III); West
Virginia Ordnance, WV (III)*; Airco, KY (IV); Alpha Chemical, FL (IV); A. L. Taylor, KY (IV);
American Creosote Works, TN (IV); American Creosote Works, FL (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN
(IV); Brown Wood Preserving, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Carolawn, SC (IV);
Celanese Fibers Operations, NC (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV);
Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); Distler Brickyard, KY (IV); Distler Farm, KY (IV); Flowood, MS (IV);
Gallaway Ponds, TN (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Hipps Road Landfill, FL (IV); National Starch,
NC (IV); Newport Dump Site, KY (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); Palmetto
Wood Preserving, SC (IV); Perdido Groundwater, AL (IV); Pioneer Sand, FL (IV); Powersville
Landfill, GA (IV); Sapp Battery, FL (IV); SCRDI DMana, SC (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV);
Sodyeco, NC (IV); Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant),
AL (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV); Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); A&F
Materials-EDD, IL (V); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Arcanum Iron & Metal, OH (V);
Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V); Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Big D
Campground, OH (V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Byron/Johnson
Salvage Yard, IL (V); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; Charlevoix, MI (V); Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V);
Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V);
Eau Claire-IRM, WI (V); Eau Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
333
-------
REMEDY SELECTION
O & M (continued)
(V); FMC Corporation, MN (V)*; Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V);
Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V); IMC Terre Haute, IN (V); Industrial
Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Ionia City Landfill, MI (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); Kummer Sanitary
Landfill, MN (V)*; Kysor Industrial, MI (V); Lake Sandy Jo, IN (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Long
Prairie, MN (V); Marion/Bragg Landfill, IN (V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Miami County
Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); New
Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*;
Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and
Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oak Grove Landfill, MN (V); Old Mill, OH (V); Ott/Story/Cordova
Chemical, MI (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Pristine, OH (V); Reilly Tar, MN (V);
Reilly Tar & Chemical, MN (V)*; Rose Township, MI (V); Schmalz Dump, WI (V)*; Seymour, IN
(V); Seymour, IN (V)*; South Andover, MN (V); Summit National, OH (V); United Scrap Lead,
OH (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Verona Well Field-IRM, MI (V); Waste Disposal Engineering,
MN (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Wausau Water
Supply, WI (V)*; Windom Dump, MN (V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Bayou Bonfouca,
LA (VI)*; Bayou Sorrel, LA (VI); Bio-Ecology Systems, TX (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cleve
Rcber, LA (VI); Crystal City Airport, TX (VI); Dixie Oil, TX (VI); French Limited, TX (VI);
Geneva Industries, TX (VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX
(VI)*; Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Mid-South Wood, AR (VI);
Motco, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium
II, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium II, TX (VI)*; Old Inger, LA (VI); Pesses Chemical, TX (VI);
Petro-Chemical Systems, TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sikes Disposal Pits, TX
(VI); Sol Lynn (09/23/88), TX (VI)*; South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South Valley/SJ-6, NM
(VI)*; Tar Creek, OK (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI)*; United
Nuclear, NM (VI); Aidex, IA (VII)*; Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Chemplex, IA (VII); Cherokee
County/Galena, KS (VII); Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Deere,
John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Des Moines TCE, IA (VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS
(VII); Ellisville Site Area, MO (VII)*; Findett, MO (VII); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII);
Hastings Ground Water, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings
Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*; Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*; Solid State
Circuits, MO (VII); Times Beach, MO (VII)*; Todtz, Lawrence Farm, IA (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax,
IA (VII); Arsenic Trioxide, ND (VIII); California Gulch, CO (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO
(VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium III, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/llth
& UmatSlla, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/12th & Quivas, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Card
Property, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Open Space, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/ROBCO, CO
(VIII)*; Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Milltown, MT (VIII);
Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO (VIII); Smuggler Mountain, CO (VIII); Union Pacific, WY (VIII);
Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII)*; Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Beckman Instruments/Porterville,
CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); Fairchild
Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX);
Iron Mountain Mine, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX);
Litchfield Airport (9/26/89), AZ (DC); Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ
(DC); Operating Industries, CA (DC); Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries
(09/30/88), CA (DC)*; Raytheon, CA (IX); Sacramento Army Depot, CA (IX); San Fernando Area I,
CA (IX); San Gabriel Area I, CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA (IX)*; South Bay
Asbestos, CA (DC); South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX)*; Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX)*; Tucson
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
334
-------
REMEDY SELECTION
O & M (continued)
International Airport, AZ (IX); Colbert Landfill, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X);
Commencement Bay/Nearshore (9/30/89), WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*;
Gould, OR (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northside Landfill, WA (X); Ponders Corner-IRM, WA
(X); South Tacoma Channel-Well 12A, WA (X)*; Toftdahl Drum, WA (X); United Chrome, OR
(X); Western Processing, WA (X)*
ROD Amendment
Sylvester, NH (I); Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Tyson's Dump (Amendment), PA
(III); New Brighton/Arden Hills (Amendment), MN (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V);
Milltown, MT (VIII)
WATER SUPPLY
Alternate Water Supply
Auburn Road, NH (I): Charles George, MA (I); Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Kellogg-Deering Well
Field, CT (I)*; Winthrop Landfill-EDD, ME (I); American Thermostat, NY (II); Bridgeport, NJ (II);
Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Combe Fill South Landfill, NJ (II); GE Moreau, NY (II); Haviland
Complex, NY (II); Kentucky Avenue Well Field, NY (II); Krysowaty Farm, NJ (II);
Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II); Montgomery Township, NJ (II); Montgomery Township Housing, NJ
(II)*; Nascolite, NJ (II); Olean Well Field, NY (II); Price Landfill, NJ (II); Rocky Hill, NJ (II);
Vega Alta, PR (II); Williams Property, NJ (II); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Berks
Sand Pit, PA (III); Blosenski Landfill, PA (III); Chisman Creek, VA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA
(III); CryoChem, PA (III); Fischer & Porter, PA (III); Industrial Lane, PA (III); Emberton, PA
(III); Kimberton, PA (III)*; Matthews Electroplating, VA (III); Middletown Airfield, PA (III);
Strasburg Landfill, PA (III); Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV);
Acme Solvents, IL (V); Allied/fronton Coke, OH (V)*; Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V); Byron
Salvage, IL (V)*; Byron Salvage (6/30/89), IL (V)*; Charlevoix, MI (V); Eau Claire-IRM, WI (V);
Eau Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V); Kummer Landfill,
MN (V); Lake Sandy Jo, IN (V); Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V);
New Brighton/Arden Hills/St. Anthony, MN (V)*; New Brighton-Water Supply System, MN (V)*;
Old Mill, OH (V); Reilly Tar, MN (V); South Andover, MN (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); Verona Well
Field-IRM, MI (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI); Odessa
Chromium II, TX (VI); South Valley-IRM, NM (VI); Cherokee County/Galena, KS (VII); Deere,
John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Todtz, Lawrence Farm, IA (VII);
Arsenic Trioxide, ND (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*;
Milltown, MT (VIII); Smuggler Mountain, CO (VIII); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Purity Oil
Sales, CA (IX); Colbert Landfill, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Martin Marietta,
OR (X); Landfill, WA (X); Northside Landfill, WA (X)
Drinking Water Contaminants
Auburn Road, NH (I); Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland
Wells, MA (I); Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT
(I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
335
-------
WATER SUPPLY
Drinking Water Contaminants (continued)
(I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I);
American Thermostat, NY (II); Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Caldwell
Trucking, NJ (II)*; Combe Fill South Landfill, NJ (II); DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Endicott Village
Well Field, NY (II); GE Moreau, NY (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Kentucky Avenue Well
Field, NY (II); Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II); Montgomery Township, NJ (II); Montgomery
Township Housing, NJ (II)*; Nascolite, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Preferred
Plating, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY (II); Rockaway Borough Well
Field, NJ (II); Rocky Hill, NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Vega
Alta, PR (II); Vestal, NY (II); Williams Properly, NJ (II); Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Bally
Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); Blosenski Landfill, PA (III);
Chisman Creek, VA (III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III); CryoChem, PA (III); Delaware Sand and
Gravel, DE (HI); Fischer & Porter, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA
(III)*; Industrial Lane, PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III); Emberton, PA (III)*; Middletown Airfield,
PA (III); New Castle Steel DE (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE (III); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC
(IV); Carolawn, SC (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Hipps Road Landfill, FL (IV); National
Starch, NC (IV); Perdido Groundwater, AL (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); Sodyeco, NC (IV);
Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Zellwood,
FL (IV); Allied/fronton Coke, OH (V)*; Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V);
Byron Johnson Salvage Yard, EL (V)*; Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; Eau Claire-IRM, WI (V); Eau
Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; FMC Corporation, MN (V)*; Hedblum Industries, MI (V);
Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Kysor Industrial, MI (V);
Lake Sandy Jo, IN (V); Main Street Wellfield, IN (V); Marion/Bragg Landfill, IN (V); Mason
County Landfill, MI (V); Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); New
Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; New Brighton/Arden Hills/St. Anthony, MN (V)*; Northernaire
Plating, MI (V)*; Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical
Corporation, IN (V); Pristine, OH (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical, MN (V); Seymour, IN (V)*; Tower
Chemical, FL (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); Verona Well Field-IRM, MI (V); Waite Park Wells, MN
(V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Wausau Water Supply, WI (V)*; Windom Dump, MN (V);
Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium II, TX (VI); Odessa
Chromium II, TX (VI)*; Sol Lynn (09/23/88), TX (VI)*; South Valley-IRM, NM (VI); South
Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; South Valley/SJ-6, NM (VI)*; Cherokee County/Galena, KS (VII);
Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Des Moines TCE, IA (VII);
Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE
(VII)*; Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Arsenic Trioxide, ND (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT
(VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO (VIII); Smuggler Mountain, CO (VIII); Fairchild Semicond
(Mt. View), CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); IBM (San Jose), CA (IX); Indian
Bend Wash, AZ (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); MGM Brakes,
CA (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); San Fernando Area I, CA (IX); San
Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San Gabriel Area I, CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2
& 4)*, CA (IX)*; Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX); Colbert Landfill, WA (X); Frontier Hard
Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northside Landfill, WA (X)
Floodplain
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I); Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Cannon
Engineering, MA (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*;
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
336
-------
WATER SUPPLY
Floodplain (continued)
Norwood PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; South Municipal
Water Supply, NH (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkham Garage, NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I);
Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II)*; Chemical Control,
NJ (II)*; Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Clothier Disposal,NY (II); DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Diamond
Alkali, NJ (II); Florence Landfill, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II);
Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Renora Inc., NJ (II); Sharkey
Landfill, NJ (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Ambler Asbestos
Piles (9/29/89), PA (III); Bendix, PA (III); Bruin Lagoon, PA (III)*; Chisman Creek, VA (III)*;
Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III); Fike Chemical, WV (III);
Havertown PCP, PA (III); L.A Clarke & Son, VA (III); New Castle Spill, DE (III); Palmerton Zinc,
PA (III)*; West Virginia Ordnance, WV (III)*; Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III); Wildcat Landfill,
DE (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE (III)*; American Creosote Works, TN (IV); American Creosote
Works, FL (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Distler Brickyard, KY (IV); Hipps Road Landfill, FL
(IV); Kassouf-Kimberling Battery, FL (IV); Newport Dump Site, KY (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV);
A&F Materials, IL (V); A&F Materials-EDD, IL (V)*; Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Auto Ion
Chemicals, MI (V); Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V); FMC Corporation, MN
(V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Ionia City Landfill, MI (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V);
Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Marion/Bragg Landfill, IN (V);
Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI); Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI);
Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI)*; Cleve Reber, LA (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Geneva Industries, TX
(VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Gurley Pit (9/26/88), AR (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI); Highlands
Acid Pit, TX (VI)*; Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); MOTCO, TX (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; Sheridan
Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI)*; Sikes Disposal Pits, TX (VI);
Triangle Chemical, TX (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Big
River Sand, KS (VII); Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; Deere, John, Dubuqiie Works, IA (VII);
Findett, MO (VII); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII); Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO
(VII)*; Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII); Syntex Verona, MO (VII); Times Beach, MO (VII)*;
Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); Denver Radium/11th & Umatilla, CO (VIII)*; Denver
Radium/Open Space, CO (VIII)*; Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX); Celtor Chemical, CA
(IX)*; Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA (IX)*; South
Bay Asbestos, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX)*; Commencement Bay/Nearshore
(9/30/89), WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome (12/30/87), WA (X)
Sole-Source Aquifer
Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II)*; Price Landfill, NJ (II); Rockaway Borough
Wellfield, NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Bendix,
PA (III); Biscayne Aquifer Sites, FL (IV); Pioneer Sand, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Wausau
Water Supply, WI (V)*; Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium II, TX (VI)*; South
Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*; Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; Hastings Groundwater/Colorado
Avenue, NE (VII); Ordot Landfill, GU (IX); Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Selma Pressure Treating,
CA (IX); Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX); Northside Landfill, WA (X)
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
337
-------
WATER SUPPLY
Wetlands
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Charles
George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Hocomonco Pond, MA (I);
Industri-plex, MA (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*;
Landfill & Resource Recovery, RI (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Nyanza Chemical, MA (I);
O'Connor, ME (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I);
Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkham Garage, NH (I); Wells G&H,
MA (I); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II)*; Bridgeport, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog,
NJ (II); Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II)*; Chemical Insecticide, NJ (II);
Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Clothier Disposal, NY (II); Combe Fill South Landfill, NJ (II); Ewan
Property, NJ (II)*; Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (7/11/88), NJ (II)*; Ludlow Sand &
Gravel, NY (II); PAS Oswego, NY (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Wide
Beach, NY (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Bendix, PA (III); Chisman
Creek, VA (III); Chisman Creek, VA (III)*; Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal
(Amendment), PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Harvey-Knott, DE (III); L.A Clarke & Son,
VA (III); Millcreek, PA (HI); New Castle Spill, DE (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*; Southern
Maryland Wood, MD (III); Westline, PA (III); West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III); West
Virginia Ordnance, WV (III)*; Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE (III);
Wildcat Landfill, DE (III)*; Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Flowood, MS (IV); Geiger
(C&M Oil), SC (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V);
Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V);
Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Mason County Landfill, MI (V);
MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN
(V)*; Oak Grove Landfill, MN (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical,
MN (V)*; Rose Township, MI (V); Schmalz Dump, WI (V); Schmalz Dump, WI (V)*; Waste
Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Homestake Mining,
NM (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; Old Inger, LA (VI); Tar Creek, OK (VI); Cherokee County, KS (VII)*;
South Bay Asbestos, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX)*; Commencement Bay/Nearshore
(9/30/89), WA (X)
STANDARDS/REGUIATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE
Hybrid/Alternate Closure
Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY (II); Kane & Lombard, MD (III); Forest
Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V);
Johns-Mansville, IL (V) Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Frontier Hard
Chrome (12/30/87), WA (X)
ARARs (Used as a keyword from FY 1982 - 1988 only)
Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I);
Groveland Wells, MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Laurel
Park, CT (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Ottati & Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Re-Solve, MA
(I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); American Thermostat, NY (II); Asbestos
Dump, NJ (II); Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Chemical Control, NJ (II)*;
Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); Endicott Village Well Field, NY (II)*; Ewan Property, NJ (II); GE
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
338
-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE
ARARs (continued)
Moreau, NY (II); GE Wiring Devices, PR (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Katonah Municipal
Well, NY; Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (7/11/88), NJ (II)*; Love Canal/93rd Street
School, NY (II)*; Love Canal, NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Marathon Battery
(9/30/88), NY (II)*; Montgomery Township, NJ (II); Montgomery Township Housing, NJ (II);
Nascolite, NJ (II); Old Bethpage, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); Ringwood
Mines/Landfill, NY (II); Rocky Hill, NJ (II); South Brunswick Landfill, NJ (II)*; Tabernacle Drum
Dump, NJ (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Vega Alta, PR (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II);
Waldick Aerospace, NJ (II); Williams Property, NJ (H); York Oil, NY (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles,
PA (III); Avtex Fibers, VA (HI); Bendix, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); Chisman Creek, VA
(IH)*; Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III)*; Drake Chemical, PA
(III)*; Fike Chemical, WV (III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Kane & Lombard, MD (III);
Kimberton, PA (III); L.A. Clarke & Son, VA (III); Middletown Airfield, PA (III); Ordnance Works
Disposal, WV (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III): Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*; Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA
(III); Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds, VA (III); Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); Tyson's Dump
(Amendment), PA (III); Westline, PA (III)*; West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III); West
Virginia Ordnance, WV (III)*; Wildcat Landfill, DE (III); Airco, KY (IV); Alpha Chemical, FL
(IV); Brown Wood Preserving, FL (IV); Celanese Fibers Operations, NC (IV); Chemtronics, NC
(IV); Flowood, MS (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV): Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); National Starch,
NC (IV); Newport Dump Site, KY (IV); Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC (IV); Perdido Groundwater,
AL (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); Sodeyco, NC (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Tri-City
Conservation, FL (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*;
BeMdere Landfill, IL (V); Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); Eau Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*;
FMC Corporation, MN (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); IMC Terre Haute, IN (V);
Johns-Manville, IL (V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*;
Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V)*; Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Long Prairie, MN (V); Marion/Bragg
Landfill, IN (V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); New Brighton/Arden
Hills/St. Anthony, MN (V); New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; NL/Taracorp/Golden Auto Parts,
MN (V)*; Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN
(V); Oak Grove Landfill, MN (V); Pristine, OH (V); Republic Steel Quarry, OH (V); Rose
Township, MI (V); Schmalz Dump, WI (V)*; Seymour, IN (V)*; South Andover, MN (V); Summit
National, OH (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V);
Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Bailey Waste Disposal,
TX (VI); Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI)*; Bayou Sorrel, LA (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cleve Reber,
LA (VI); Crystal City Airport, TX (VI); Dixie Oil, TX (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Gurley Pit,
AR (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR
(VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Mid-South Wood Products, AR (VI); North Cavalcade Street,
TX (VI); Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium II, TX (VI)*; Old Midland Products,
AR (VI); Petro-Chemical System, TX (VI); Sand Springs, OK (VI)*; Sol Lynn (03/25/88), TX (VI);
Sol Lynn (09/23/88), TX (VI)*; South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*;
South Valley/SJ-6, NM (VI)*; United Nuclear, NM (VI); Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Big River
Sand, KS (VII); Cherokee County/Galena, KS (VII); Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Deere,
John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII); Hastings
Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*;
Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*;
Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Syntex Verona, MO (VII); Times
Beach, MO (VII)*; Anaconda Smelter/Mill Creek, MT (VIII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII);
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
339
-------
STANDAKDS/REGUIATIONS/PERMrrS/GUIDANCE
ARARs (continued)
Central aty/Clear Creek, CO (VIII); Denver Radium/llth & Umatilla, CO (VIII)*; Denver
Radium/12th & Quivas CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium III, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Card Property,
CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Open Space, CO (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO (VIII); Indian
Bend Wash, AZ (DC); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA (IX); MGM
Brakes, CA (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX);Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA (IX)*;
Operating Industries (09/30/88), CA (IX)*; San Fernando Area I, CA (IX); San Gabriel Area I, CA
(IX); Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA
(IX); Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX); Colbert Landfills, WA (X); Commencement
Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore (9/30/89), WA (X); Commencement
Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome (12/30/87), WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome
(07/05/88), WA (X)*; Gould, OR (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Pacific Hide and Fur, ID (X)
Clean Air Act
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Charles
George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Groveland Wells, MA (I); Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*;
Landfill & Resource Recovery, RI (I); Laurel Park, CT (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor, ME
(I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Saco Tannery
Waste Pits, ME (I)*; South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Wells G&H,
MA (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); Asbestos Dump, NJ (II);
DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Endicott Village Well Field, NY (II); FAA Technical Center, NJ (II);
Fulton Terminals, NY (II); Lipari Landfill, NJ (II)*; Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Reich Farm, NJ
(II); Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA
(III); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III);
Fike Chemical, WV (HI); Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III); Tyson's Dump,
PA (III)*; Airco, KY (IV); Carolawn, SC (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Goodrich, B.F.,
KY (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Big D Campground, OH (V);
Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V);
Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Ionia City Landfill, MI (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); Kysor
Industrial, MI (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*; Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Laskin/Poplar
Oil, OH (V)*; MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN
(V); New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Seymour, IN (V)*; U.S.
Aviex, MI (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V)*; French Limited, TX
(VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Hastings
Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*; Solid
State Circuits, MO (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, LA (VII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII)*; Atlas
Asbestos Mine, CA (LX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX);
Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA (LX)*; Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); San Fernando Area I, CA
(IX); South Bay Asbestos, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX)*; Gould, OR (X);
Northside Landfill, WA (X)
Clean Water Act
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Davis
Liquid Waste, RI (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*;
Landfill & Resource Recovery, RI (I); ; Laurel Park, CT (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor,
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
340
-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE
Clean Water Act (continued)
, • c I); Pinette'S Salva8e Yard' ME (^ Re-Solve> MA (I)*; Rose
Disposa Pit, MA (I); Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I)-
Sullivan's L^dge, MA (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); American Krmostat,
NY (II); Chemical Control, NJ (II)*; Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Endicott Village Well Field, NY (II)-
Haviland Complex, NY (II); Katonah Municipal Well, NY (II); Lipari Landfill (7/11/88 , NJ (II '*•
^S^m^972^' OT (II)*; NaSC°lite' NJ ; P^nny Arsenal, NJ (II); Preferred '
Si OifU L A B™SWM* L"-™. NJ (II); Vega Alta, PR (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II);
York CW, NY (II); Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Bendk, PA
(III); Chisman Creek, VA (III)*; Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE an*
?A3mn w"1"?' PAim)*; Rke ChemiCa1' ^ ; Havertown PCP> PA ("I* Henderson Road
J (VA ™f x?°n,?0ad' PA (III)*5 K^6"0*' PA ("I); Kimberton, PA (III *; L.A Clarke &
Son, VA (III); New Castle Steel DE (III); Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment) WV (III)-
Palmerton Zmc, PA (III)*; Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III); SaltvUle Waste Disposal Ponds, VA '
wSSTr Sf^rm' M° (III); ^^ Dump' PA ^ West Vir§inia ^nance, WV (III)* '
Wildcat Landfill DE II); Airco, KY (IV); Alpha Chemical, FL (IV); American Creosote Works,
TN (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Carolawn, SC (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV);
£t!?*?'™( J* °0d?h' RF" ** (IV); ^^f-Kimberling Battery, FL (IV); National
Starch, NC (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Stauffer
Chemical (Cold Creek) AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Towe^ Chemical,
FL (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V *• Big D
Campground, OH (V); Eau Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; FMC Corporation, MN (V); Fort
V (V); Galesburg^oppers, IL (V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Ionia City
'^ySor Industrial» MI (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*; Laskin/Poplar Oil,
); Uquid Disposal, MI (V); Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO II, IN (V)- New
* M ^ Hi"o (TCAAP)' MN (V); Ninth Avenue DumP' IN 00; Nin* Avenue Dump, m
*; Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Outboard Marine
(Amendment), IL (V); Pristine, OH (V); Rose Township, MI (V); Summit National, OH (V); U.S.
MM6^ £* , T1 ChemiCa1' IL (V); Waite Park Wells' MN 00; Waste Disposai Engineering,
MN ; Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Windom Dump MN
° 5 ^ 7-^ CiyStal City ^P0"' TO (VI>' Dkie ^ TX (VI); French Limfted
); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI)*; Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI) Motco TX (VI)*-
CaalCade lreet.' ^ (X1)' Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium II, TX (VI)*;
vn A SemCCS' ^ (VI)*; South ^^^e Street, TX (VI); United Creosoting, TX
v 2 ^ S Cily DUmp' ^ (VII); Cherokee County/Galena, KS (VII); Cherokee County, KS
w } if?w?»10?- Chemica1' M0 (VD); DoePke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VH); Vogel Paint &
Wax, IA (VII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water MT (VIID*-
(Mt ViCW)' CA (IX); IBM ' CA (IX* Intel (Mountain Viewj/CA
ifn ^ (IX)j^Perating Industries (H/16/87), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries
(09/30/88), CA (IX)*; Ordot Landfill, GU (IX); Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX);
Strmgfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX)*; Colbert Landfill WA (XV
Commencement Bay/Nearshore (9/30/89), WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Frontier
Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Northside Landfill, WA (X) rronuer
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
341
-------
STANDARDS/REGUIATIONS/PERMTTS/GUIDANCE
Water Quality Criteria
Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); American Thermostat, NY (II);
Chemical Control, NJ (II)*; Endicott Village Well Field, NY (II); Fulton Terminate, NY (II);
Katonah Municipal Well, NY (II); Lipari Landfill (9/30/85), NJ (II)*; Lipan Landfill (7/11/88), NJ
(II)*; Marathon Battery (9/29/89), NY (II)*; Preferred Plating, NY (II); Army Creek Landfill, DE
(III)1 Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Bendix, PA (III);
Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Henderson Road, PA (III);
Kimberton, PA (III)*; New Castle Steel DE (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*; Rhinehart Tire Fire,
VA ail); Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III)*; West Virginia Ordnance,
WV (III)*; Wildcat Landfill, DE (III)*; Airco, KY (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV);
Carolawn, SC (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Coleman Evans,
FL (IV)- Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Kassouf-Kimberling Battery, FL (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old
Reichhold, MS (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV); AUied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Eau Claire Municipal
Well Field, WI (V)*; FMC Corporation, MN (V)*; Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Hedblum
Industries MI (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Johns-Manville, IL (V); Kysor Industrial,
MI (V); New Brighton-Water Supply System, MN (V)*; Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*;
Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Waite Park Wells, MN (V);
Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Northside Sanitary
Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Pristine, OH (V); Republic
Steel Quarry, OH (V); Summit National, OH (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V);
Verona Well Field-IRM, MI (V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Brio Refining, TX (VI);
Crystal City Airport, TX (VI); Dixie Oil, TX (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Industrial Waste ^
Control, AR (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); South Calvacade Street, TX
(VI)- South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*; United Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Cherokee County, KS
(VII)*; Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Vogel Paint &
Wax IA (VII); Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (DC); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville
Plant) CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX) Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Ordot
Landfill, GU (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore (9/30/89), WA (X); Commencement
Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement BayyTacoma, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88),
WA (X)*; Northside Landfill, WA (X)
RCRA
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Charles
George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Groveland Wells, MA (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I) ;
Kelloee-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*; Landfill & Resource Recovery, RI (I); Laurel Park, CT (I);
Norwood PCBs? MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Pinette's Salvage
Yard, ME (I); Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Sullivan's Ledge,
MA 0); Western Sand & Gravel, RI (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I);
Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Claremont
Polychemical, NY (II)*; Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II) ;
FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); GE Wiring Devices, PR (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari
Landfill (7/11/88), NJ (II)*; Love Canal, NY (II); Love Canal, NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY
HI); Marathon Battery (9/30/88), NY (II)*; Marathon Battery (9/29/89), NY (II)*; Picatmny Arsenal,
NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Preferred Plating, NY (II); PAS Oswego, NY (H);
Preferred Plating, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (H); South Brunswick• ^
Landfill, NJ (II)*; Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II); Williams Property, NJ (II);
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
342
-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE
RCRA (continued)
York Oil, NY (II); Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Bendix PA (III)-
Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III)- Dornev
Road Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III)*; Drake Chemical, PA (III)*- Fike
S^T1?1'.^ (III); Havertown PCP' PA (nl); Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA
(III)*; L.A Clarke & Son, VA (III); MW Manufacturing, PA (III); New Castle Steel DE (III)-
Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III); Palmerton Zinc PA (III)*-
Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking, PA (III); Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III); Saltville Waste Disposal
Ponds, VA (III); Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); West Virginia Ordnance WV (III)*-
Whltmoyer Laboratories, PA (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE (III); Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway Six NC
(IV); Airco, KY (IV); Alpha Chemical, FL (IV); American Creosote Works, TN (IV); American
Creosote Works, FL (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Biscayne Aquifer Sites, FL (IV); Brown Wood
Preserving, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*-
Chemtromcs, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); Geiger (C&M
S?'/S£ (^' Goodrich' B'F" KY (JV); Kassouf-Kimberling Battery, FL (IV); Newport Dump Site,
KY (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC (IV)- Perdido
Groundwater, AL (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Sodyeco NC (IV)-
Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV) Tower
Chemical, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Alsco Anaconda OH rw
Arcanum Iron & Metal, OH (V); Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Big D Campground OH (V)-
Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*- Cliff/Dow
Dump, MI (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Eau Claire Municipal Well Field WI W*-
E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (VV '
Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); IMC Terre Haute, IN (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*- Ionia
City Landfill, MI (V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Kysor Industrial, MI (V)- LaSalle
f1^?1™1"**68' IL (V)*; La^°^°P]af Oil, OH (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V)*| Marion/Bragg
Landfill, IN (V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V)- Ninth
Avenue Dump IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Northernaire
Plating, MI (V)*; Old Mill, OH (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Pristine OH W
Republic Steel Quarry, OH (V); Seymour, IN (V)*; Summit National, OH (V); U.S. Aviex MI (VY
Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Windom Dump, MN (V)-
Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI); Cleve Reber LA (VI)-
Crystal City Airport, TX (VI); Dixie Oil, TX (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI)-
Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*- North
Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI)*- Sol
Lynn (03/25/88), TX (VI); South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Aidex
^1 S5 ^kansas City Du«ip,KS (VII); Chemplex, IA (VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS
(VII); Elhsville Site Area, MO (VII)*; Findett, MO (VII); Hastings Ground Water, NE (VII)-
Kern-Pest Laboratory, MO (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII)-
Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*; Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII); Synt'ex Verona MO
(VII); Times Beach, MO (VII)*; Todtz, Lawrence Farm, IA (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax LA (VII)-
Brodenck Wood Products, CO (VIII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); Central City/Clear
Creek, CO (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Woodbury
Chemical, CO (VIII)*; Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose)
SL(S ^P?6rS (°roville Plant)> CA (K); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Litchfield Airport
J??,S'^ (IX)J MGM Brakes' CA ; Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX); Operating Industries
(11/16/87), CA (IX)*; Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); San Fernando Area I, CA (IX); San Fernando
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
343
-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE
RCRA (continued)
Valley (Area 1), CA (EX); Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX)
Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore (9/30/89), WA (X);
Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Gould, OR
(X); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northside Landfill, WA (X); Pacific Hide and Fur, ID (X); Ponders
Corner, WA (X)*
Closure Requirements
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Landfill & Resource Recovery, RI (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME
(I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Winthrop Landfill-EDD, ME (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); Brewster Well
Field, NY (II); Bridgeport, NJ (II); Combe Fill North Landfill, NJ (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II);
Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ
(II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY (II); Vineland
Chemical, NJ (II); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III); Blosenski Landfill, PA (III); Delaware Sand and
Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III);
Enterprise Avenue, PA (III); Kane & Lombard, MD (III); Moyer Landfill, PA (III); Ordnance
Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III); Tyson's Dump (Amendment), PA (III); West
Virginia Ordnance, WV (III)*; Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC
(IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Gallaway Ponds, TN (IV); Pioneer Sand, FL (IV);
Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Chff/Dow
Dump, MI (V); Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); IMC Terre Haute, IN (V); Ionia City Landfill, MI
(V); Lake Sandy Jo, IN (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Motco, TX
(VI)*; Rose Township, MI (V); Summit National, OH (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Wauconda
Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Windom Dump, MN (V); Bayou Sorrel, LA (VI); Industrial Waste
Control, AR (VI); Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Doepke Disposal
(Holliday), KS (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, LA (VII); Libby Ground Water, MT
(VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Commencement
Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X); South Tacoma, WA (X); Western Processing, WA
(X)*
Clean Closure
Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Wiring Devices, PR (II); Renora Inc., NJ
(II); Williams Property, NJ (II); Havertown PCP, PA (III); Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III);
Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*;
Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI)*; Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); Kern-Pest Laboratory, MO (VII); Midwest
Manufacturing/North Farm, LA (VII); Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII)
Landfill Closure
Landfill & Resource Recovery, RI (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II);
Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Port Washington
Landfill, NY (II); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Ordnance
Works Disposal (Amendment), WV (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III); Tyson's Dump (Amendment), PA
(III); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Bower's Landfill, OH
(V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); IMC Terre Haute, IN (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
344
-------
STANDARDS/REGUIATIONS/PERMirS/GUTOANCE
Landfill Closure (continued)
(V)*; Johns-Manville, IL (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Miami
County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V);
Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Northside Sanitary landfill/Environmental Conservation and
Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oak Grove Landfill, MN (V); Summit National, OH (V); Waste
Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Doepke Disposal (Hollidav) KS (VIIV
Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northside Landfill, WA (X)
Safe Drinking Water Act
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4 MA
(I) ; Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*-
Kellogg-Deenng Well Field, CT (I)*; Laurel Park, CT (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor, ME
(I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose
Disposa Pit, MA (I); Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; South Municipal Water Supply, NH (IV
Sullivan's L^dge, MA (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Yaworski
Lagoon, CT (I); American Thermostat, NY (II); Endicott Village Well Field, NY (II)- Ewan
rTTOPSty'.,NJJ(n)*; FAA Technical C61116'. NJ (H); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Moreau, NY
m? ^avlland C^P16*' NY (II); Marathon Battery (9/30/88), NY (II)*; Montgomery Township, NJ
(II); Montgomery Township Housing, NJ (II)*; Nascolite, NJ (II); Old Bethpage, NY my Port
Washington Landfill, NY (II); Preferred Plating, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II)-
Rmgwood Mines/Landfill, NY (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ (II)-
Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II); Williams'
Property, NJ (II); Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Bally Groundwater
Contarmnatton, PA (III); Bendix, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III);
S2P pTV™*(£'' ?elaware, Sand and Gravel> DE ("I); Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson
Road, PA (III)*; Kimberton, PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III)*; Middletown Airfield, PA (III)- New
Castle Steel DE (III); Voortman Farm, PA (III); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV) Carolawn,
SC (IV); Celanese Fibers Operations, NC (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV); Ciba-Geigy AL (IV)-
Flowood, MS (IV); Kassouf-Kimberling Battery, FL (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); Newsome
Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC (IV); Perdido Groundwater, AL
(IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Sodyeco, NC (IV); Stauffer Chemical
(Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Tower Chemical FL (IVV
Zellwood, FL (IV); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Big D Campground,
OH (V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Corporation, MN (V)*; Cross
r° l°ke)' ^ (V); EH- Schilling Landfi11' OH 00; E*11 Claire Municipal Well
Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Kysor Industrial,
Electrical Utiliti<*> IL (V)*; Long Prairie, MN (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II,
™ g ^ (VI); HiShlands Acid Pit, TX (VI)*; Industrial Waste Control,
(VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI)*-
Odessa Chromium II, TX (VI)*; Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI)*; Sol Lynn (09/23/88) TX
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
345
-------
STANDARDS/REGUIATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE
Safe Drinking Water Act (continued)
(VI)*' South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*; South
Vallev/PL-83, NM (VI)*; South Valley/SJ-6, NM (VI)*; United Nuclear, NM (VI); Arkansas City
Dump, KS (VII); Big River Sand, KS (VII); Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; Cherokee County/Galena
KS (Vm; Chemplex, IA (VII); Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA
(VII): Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Broderick Wood Products, CO
(VIII): Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Sand Creek
Industrial, CO (VIII); Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View),
CA (DO- Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); IBM (San Jose), CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash,
AZ (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (DC); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (DC); Litchfield Airport
AZ (DC); Litchfield Airport (9/26/89), AZ (DC); MGM Brakes, CA (DC); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ
(DO; Purity Oil Sales, CA (DC); Raytheon, CA (IX); Sacramento Army Depot, CA (IX); San
Fernando Area I, CA (DC); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (DC); San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2
& 4) CA (DC)*- Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX); Colbert
Landfill, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore (9/30/89),
WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northside Landfill,
WA(X)
MCLs
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4 MA
m*: Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*; Norwood PCBs, MA (I);
O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve MA
(I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; South Municipal Water Supply,
NH (IV Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I);
American Thermostat, NY (II); Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Endicott
Village Well Field, NY (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); 1™°^
Terminals, NY (II); GE Moreau, NY (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Marathon Battery (9/30/88)
NY (II)*; Montgomery Township, NJ (II); Montgomery Township Housing, NJ (II)*; Old Bethpage,
NY (IIV Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Preferred Plating, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II);
Renora Inc., NJ (II); Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY (II); Rocky Hill, NJ (II); SMS Instruments NY
(IIV Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II);
Williams Property, NJ (II); Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Bally Groundwater
Contamination, PA (III); Bendix, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III);
CryoChem, PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Henderson
Road, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III)*; Kimberton, PA (III); Emberton, PA (III)*;
Middletown Airfield, PA (III); New Castle Steel DE (III); Strasburg Landfill, PA (III); Tyson s
Dump, PA (III)*; Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV); Airco, KY (IV); Cape Fear Wood
Preserving, NC (IV); Carolawn, SC (IV); Celanese Fibers Operations, NC (IV); Chemtromcs, NC
(IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV);
Kassouf-Kimberling Battery, FL (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC
(IW Perdido Groundwater, AL (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek), AL
(IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Alsco Anaconda,
OH (V); Big D Campground, OH (V); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V);
Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Eau Claire Municipal Well
Field WI (V)*- E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); FMC Corporation, MN (V)*; Forest Waste
Disposal, MI (V)*5 Hedblum Industries, MI (V); IMC Terre Haute, IN (V); Industrial Excess
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
346
-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE
MCLs (continued)
Landfill OH (V)*; Kysor Industrial, MI (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*; Liquid Disposal
m $;^ng/-airie' ™* (V); Miami Qnm^ ^inerator, OH (V); MIDCO I IN iPristine' OH 005 Rose Township, MI (V); Schmalz Dump,
WI (V)*, Seymour, IN (V)*; South Andover, MN (V); U.S. Aviex MI (V)- Waite Park
(V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Wausau Water Supply ^ W ^
Controf ^V? ff? ^ ™^M ' ^ (VI)5 HiShlands Acid Pi\, T£ (VI)*;
* ^ (y? ' ** (VI) ; North C3™1^6 Street, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium I, TX
; Odessa Chromium ^11, TX (VI)*; Sheridan Disposal Services TX (VI)*; Sol Lynn (09/23/88),
™^™af T6T StreCt' ^ (VI); S°Uth Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (Vl£ South *
NM (VI)*; United Nuclear, NM (VI); Big River Sand, KS (VII); Chemplex IA (VII)-
H^nT KS 4T1? Cher°kee Ooun^ KS 0^)'; Conservation Chemical MO ^
A /-vm ,r' D,u^Ue,W?rkS' ^ (VII)5 Solid state Circuits, MO (VII); Todtz, Lawrence
Farm IA (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Broderick Wood Products CO (VIII)- Burlington
Northern (Somers) MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Rocky' Mounta n ^ena^S
(VII ); Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX)- Fairchild
Sn?i% }' SA 1K); FairChild SemiC°nd (S San JoSe>' CA (IX ' Indian Bend WasL, AZ
§ i^A m V!Sa CA (IX); K°PperS (°roville PIant>' CA IN (V); Ninth Avenue DumP' IN W*; Northside Sanhary
Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V)- US Aviex, MI CW
Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII) ' ' ( ''
State Standards/Regulations/Guidance
r±!7 H°W V^T^*5 Cann°n E^66^' MA (I); Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I);
Groveland Wells MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I *;
P ld' °T S ^dge' ^ W> ^ells G&H' ^ «' W.R. Grace
(Acton Plant), MA (I); American Thermostat, NY (II); Asbestos Dump, NJ (II); Bog Creek Farm
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
347
-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMITS/GUroANCE
State Standards/Regulations/Guidance (continued)
NJ (II)*; Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Bridgeport, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Byron Barrel
& Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II)*; Chemical Insecticide, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*;
Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); D'Imperio Properly, NJ (II); Endicott
Village Well Field, NY (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; FAA Technical
Center, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Moreau, NY (II); Goose Farm, NJ (II); Haviland
Complex, NY (II); Katonah Municipal Well, NY (II); Kentucky Avenue Wellfield, NY (II); Kin-Buc
Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (7/11/88), NJ (II)*; Love Canal, NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel,
NY (II); Marathon Battery (9/30/88), NY (II)*; Marathon Battery (9/29/89), NY (II)*;
Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II); Montgomery Township, NJ (II); Montgomery Township Housing, NJ
(!!)*' Nascolite, NJ (II); North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY (II); Old Bethpage, NY (II); Pepe Field,
NJ (II)- Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Preferred Plating, NY (II);
Reich Farm, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY (II); Rocky Hill, NJ (II);
Sharkey Landfill, NJ (II); Sinclair Refinery, NY (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Swope Oil, NJ (II);
Suffern Village Well Field, NY (II); Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR
(II)' Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ (II); Williams
Property, NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III);
Ambler Asbestos Piles (9/29/89), PA (III); Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Bally Groundwater
Contamination, PA (III); Bendix, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III);
Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal
(Amendment), PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Havertown PCP, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA
(III); Kimberton, PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III)*; L.A. Clarke & Son, VA (III); New Castle, DE
(III)- Palmerton Zinc, PA (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*; Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds, VA (III);
Tyson's Dump (Amendment), PA (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III)*; West Virginia Ordnance, WV
nil)*; Wildcat Landfill, DE (III); Alpha Chemical, FL (IV); American Creosote Works, TN (IV);
Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Celanese Fibers Operations, NC (IV); Celanese/Shelby
Fibers, NC (IV)*; Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Coleman Evans, FL
(IV); Hipps Road Landfill, FL (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); SCRDI Dixiana, SC (IV);
Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Sodyeco, NC (IV); Tri-City Conservation, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV);
A&F Materials-EDD, IL (V)*; Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; AlscoAnaconda, OH (V); Auto Ion
Chemicals, MI (V); Auto Ion Chemicals (9/27/89), MI (V); Big D Campground, OH (V); Bower's
Landfill, OH (V); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Cross Brothers Pail
(Pembroke), IL (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); FMC Corporation, MN (V)*; Forest Waste
Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Hedblum Industries,
MI (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Ionia City Landfill, MI (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V);
Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Kysor Industrial, MI (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V);
Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V)*; Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Marion/Bragg Landfill, IN (V); Mason
County Landfill, MI (V); Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); Ninth Avenue
Dump, IN (V)*; NL/Taracorp/Golden Auto Parts, MN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*;
Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Oak
Grove Landfill, MN (V); Pristine, OH (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical, MN (V)*; Schmalz Dump, WI
(V)*; Seymour, IN (V)*; Summit National, OH (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); Waite Park Wells, MN
(VV Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Wausau Water
Supply, WI (V)*; Windom Dump, MN (V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Brio Refining,
TX (VI)- Dixie Oil, TX (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI);
Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI)*; Sol Lynn (03/25/88), TX (VI); South Calvacade Street, TX
(VI)- South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*; South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; South Valley/SJ-6,
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
348
-------
STANDARDS/REGULATIONS/PERMirS/GUTOANCE
State Standards/Regulations/Guidance (continued)
NM (VI)*; United Creosoting, TX (VI)*; United Nuclear, NM (VI); Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII);
Chemplex, IA (VII); Cherokee County/Galena, KS (VII); Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; Conservation
Chemical, MO (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS
(VII); Ellisville Site Area, MO (VII)*; Kern-Pest Laboratory, MO (VII); Minker/Stout/Romaine
Creek, MO (VII)*; Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII); Solid State Circuits,MO (VII); Syntex Verona,
MO (VII); Times Beach, MO (VII)*; Todtz, Lawrence Farm, IA (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA
(VII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); Libby
Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Monticello Vicinity Properties, UT (VIII); Sand Creek Industrial, CO
(VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII)*; Union Pacific, WY (VIII); Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (IX);
Beckman Instruments/PortervUle, CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond
(Mt. View), CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); IBM (San Jose), CA (IX); Indian
Bend Wash, AZ (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); Iron Mountain Mine, CA (IX); Koppers
(Oroville Plant), CA (IX); (continued)Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Litchfield Airport (9/26/89), AZ
(IX); Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Operating Industries (11/16/87),
CA (IX)*; Operating Industries (09/30/88), CA (IX)*; Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA
(IX); Sacramento Army Depot, CA (IX); San Fernando Area I, CA (IX); San Gabriel Area I, CA
(IX); San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA (IX)*; San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX);
Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area, CA
(IX)*; Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX); Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX); Colbert Landfill,
WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore (9/30/89), WA (X);
Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Frontier Hard Chrome (12/30/87), WA (X); Martin
Marietta, OR (X); Northside Landfill, WA (X); Northwest Transformer, WA (X); South Tacoma
Channel-Well 12A, WA (X)*
Drinking Water Standards (FY 1982 - 1988 only)
Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Groveland Wells, MA (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I);
Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); GE Moreau, NY (II); Marathon Battery (9/30/88), NY (II)*; Reich Farm,
VNJ (II); Rockaway Borough Wellfield, NJ (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Delaware Sand and
Gravel, DE (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Coleman Evans, FL (IV); Old Inger, LA (IV); Tri-City
Conservation, FL (IV); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); IMC Terre
Haute, IN (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills/St. Anthony, MN (V)*; Northside Sanitary
Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis),
NM (VI); Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium II, TX (VI)*; South Valley-IRM, NM
(VI); South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; United Nuclear, NM (VI); Milltown, MT (VIII); Indian Bend
Wash, AZ (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Colbert Landfill, WA (X); United Chrome, OR (X)
Toxic Substances Control Act
Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Picillo Farm, RI (I);
Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Wells G&H, MA (I);
Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Clothier Disposal,NY (II); Krysowaty Farm, NJ (II); Ludlow Sand &
Gravel, NY (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III);
Douglassville Disposal, PA (III)*; Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Cape Fear Wood
Preserving, NC (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV); Mowbray Engineering, AL (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old
Reichhold, MS (IV); Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Conservation and
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
349
-------
STANDARDSyREGUIATIONS/PERMITS/GUIDANCE
Toxic Substances Control Act (continued)
Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Fields Brook, OH (V);
LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*; MIDCO I, IN (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN
(V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN, (V)*; Outboard Marine (Amendment),
IL (V); Pristine, OH (V); Republic Steel Quarry, OH (V); Summit National, OH (V); U.S. Aviex,
MI Control Act (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Verona Well Field-IRM, MI (V); Waste Disposal
Engineering, MN (V); Wedzeb Enterprises, IN (V); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Crystal City Airport,
TX (VI); Dixie Oil, TX (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); North
Calvacade Street, TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sol Lynn (03/25/88), TX (VI);
South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque Works,
IA (VII); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Ordot Landfill, GU (IX);
Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore (9/30/89), WA (X);
Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X); Northwest South
Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX)*; Transformer, WA (X); Pacific Hide and Fur, ID (X)
Public Health Advisory
Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Lansdowne Radiation, PA (III);
Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*
State Permit
Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II)*; Chemical Insecticide,
NJ (II); D'Imperio Property, NJ (II); Goose Farm, NJ (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Marathon
Battery (9/29/89), NY (II)*; Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Ambler Asbestos Piles (9/29/89), PA
(III); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Delaware Sand
and Gravel, DE (III); Fike Chemical, WV (III); Kimberton, PA (III)*; Airco, KY (IV); Celanese
Fibers Operations, NC (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV);
Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V);
Kysor Industrial, MI (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN (V);
Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Verona Well Field-IRM, MI
(V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); Solid State Circuits, MO
(VII); IBM (San Jose), CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ
(IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore (9/30/89), WA (X)
'.
TESTING/PILOT STUDIES
Leachability Tests
Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Re-Solve, MA (I); DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Love Canal/93rd Street
School, NY (II)*; North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Port
Washington Landfill, NY (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); Flowood, MS (IV);
Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); Motco, TX (VI)*; United Creosoting,
TX (VI)*; Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Vogel Paint
& Wax, IA (VII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX)
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
350
-------
TESTING/PILOT STUDIES
Treatability Studies
Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Landfill & Resource Recovery, RI (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I);
O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA
(I)*; Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); Winthrop Landfill-EDD, ME (I); W.R. Grace
(Acton Plant), MA (I); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Chemical Control, NJ (II)*; Ewan Property, NJ
(II)*; GE Wiring Devices, PR (II); Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II);
Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ (II); Montgomery Township Housing, NJ (II)*; Preferred
Plating, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Tabernacle
Drum Dump, NJ (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Bally
Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Bendix, PA (HI); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Douglassville
Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (HI)*; Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard, PA (III);
Henderson Road, PA (III); L.A. Clarke & Son, VA (III); Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III);
Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III) Palmerton Zinc,
PA (III)*; Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds, VA, (III); Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III);
Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV); American Creosote Works, TN (IV); American Creosote
Works, FL (IV); Brown Wood Preserving, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV);
Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Kassouf-Kimberling Battery, FL (IV);
Leetown Pesticide, WV (IV); Sodyeco, NC (IV); Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer
Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Arcanum Iron & Metal, OH (V); BeMdere Landfill, IL (V);
Big D Campground, OH (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Ionia City
Landfill, MI (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*;
Pristine, OH (V); Seymour, IN (V)*; Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI);
Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium II, TX (VI)*; Old Inger, LA (VI); Pesses
Chemical, TX (VI); Sol Lynn (03/25/88), TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sol Lynn
(09/23/88), TX (VI)*; Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings
Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*; Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Broderick Wood Products,
CO (VIII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII); Libby
Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant),
CA (IX); Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA (IX)*;
Northwest Transformer, WA (X)
TECHNOLOGY
Aeration
Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); McKin, ME (I); Ottati & Goss/Great
Lakes, NH (I); Bendix, PA (III); Hollingsworth, FL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek), AL (IV);
Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V);
Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Waite Park Wells, MN (V); South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM
(VI)*; Triangle Chem., TX (VI); Fairchild Semicond (ML View), CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ
(IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (DC); Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); San
Fernando Area I, CA (IX); Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX)
Air Monitoring
Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Groveland Wells, MA (I);
Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*; Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
351
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Air Monitoring (continued)
(I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II)*; Byron
Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Clothier Disposal, NY (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Wiring
Devices, PR (II); Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II); Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ (II); North Sea
Municipal Landfill, NY (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Ambler Asbestos Piles (9/29/89), PA
(III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Fike Chemical, WV (III); Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III);
Airco, KY (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Perdido Groundwater, AL (IV); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI
(V); Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Johns-Manville, IL (V);
Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP),
MN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Oak Grove Landfill, MN (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V);
Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Brio Refining, TX (VI); Dixie Oil, TX (VI);
Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Hastings Ground Water, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado
Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*; Solid State Circuits, MO
(VII); Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (Mt.
View), CA (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); Operating Industries, CA (IX), Operating
Industries (09/30/88), CA (IX)*; Raytheon, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (IX)*;
Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Gould, OR (X)
Air Stripping
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Industri-plex, MA (I); Keefe
Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I); Kellogg-Deering Well Field,
CT (I)*; Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose
Disposal Pit, MA (I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); Brewster Well
Field, NY (II); Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Caldwell Trucking, NJ
(H)*; Endicott Village Well Field, NY (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Moreau, NY (II);
Haviland Complex, NY (II); Katonah Municipal Well, NY (II); Lang Property, NJ (II); Montgomery
Township Housing, NJ (II)*; Old Bethpage, NY (II); Olean Well Field, NY (II); Picatinny Arsenal,
NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Price Landfill, NJ (II)*; Reich Farm, NJ (II); Rocky
Hill, NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ (II); Upjohn Manufacturing,
PR (II); Vega Alta, PR (II); Vestal, NY (II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ (II); Williams Property, NJ
(II); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Bendix, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III);
Havertown PCP, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III)*; Tyson's Dump, PA
(III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III)*; Airco, KY (IV); Biscayne Aquifer Sites, FL (IV); Celanese Fibers
Operations, NC (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Hollingsworth, FL (IV); National Starch, NC (IV);
Perdido Groundwater, AL (IV); Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Eau Claire-IRM, WI (V); Eau Claire
Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH
(V)*; LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*; LeHillier/Mankato, MN (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V);
Long Prairie, MN (V); Main Street Well Field, IN (V); New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*;
Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Pristine, OH (V); Rose Township, MI (V); Seymour, IN (V);
Seymour, IN (V)*; U.S. Aviex, MI (V); Verona Well Field-IRM, MA (V); Verona Well Field, MI
(V)*; Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V)*;
Sol Lynn (09/23/88), TX (VI)*; South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*; South Valley/PL-83, NM
(VI)*; Chemplex, IA (VII); Des Moines TCE, IA (VII); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Vogel Paint
& Wax, IA (VII); Marshall Landfill, CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO (VIII); Sand Creek
Industrial, CO (VIII); Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose),
CA (IX); IBM (San Jose), CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX);
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
352
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Air Stripping (continued)
Litchfield Airport (9/26/89), AZ (IX); Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA (IX)*; Purity Oil Sales,
CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San Gabriel Area I, CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley
(Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA (EX)*; Ponders Corner-IRM, WA (X); Ponders Corner, WA (X)*; South
Tacoma, WA (X); South Tacoma Channel-Well 12A, WA (X)*
Biodegredation/Land Application
Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Tinkham Garage, NH (I); Renora Inc. NJ. (II); L.A. Clarke & Son, VA
(III); Leetown Pesticide, WV (III); Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III);
Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III); American Creosote Works, FL (IV); Brown Wood Preserving, FL
(IV); Byron/Johnson Salvage, IL (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V);
Atchinson/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); North Cavalcade, TX (VI); Old
Inger, LA (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Chemplex, IA (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA
(VII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Koppers
(Oroville Plant), CA (IX)
Capping
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Beacon Heights, CT (I); Charles George, MA (I)*; Hocomonco
Pond, MA (I); Industri-plex, MA (I); Laurel Park, CT (I); Nyanza Chemical, MA (I); Ottati &
Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Re-Solve, MA (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Sylvester, NH (I); Winthrop
Landfill-EDD, ME (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); Bog Creek
Farm, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Chemical Insecticide, NJ (II); Combe Fill North Landfill, NJ
(II); Combe Fill South Landfill, NJ (II); Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); D'Imperio Property, NJ (II);
Florence Landfill, NJ (II); GE Moreau, NY (II); GEMS Landfill, NJ (II); GE Wiring Devices, PR
(II); Goose Farm, NJ (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill
(7/11/88), NJ (II)*; Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II);
North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY (II); Old Bethpage, NY (II); PAS Oswego, NY (II); Port
Washington Landfill, NY (II); Sharkey Landfill, NJ (II); Sinclair Refinery, NY (II); Swope Oil, NJ
(II); Volney Landfill, NY (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Ambler Asbestos Piles (9/29/89), PA
(III); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III); Blosenski Landfill, PA (III); Bruin Lagoon, PA (III)*; Chisman
Creek, VA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road
Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Drake
Chemical, PA (III); Enterprise Avenue, PA (III); Heleva Landfill, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA
(III)*; Kane & Lombard, MD (III); Lackawanna Refuse Site, PA (III); Limestone Road, MD (III);
Matthews Electroplating, VA (III); McAdoo Associates, PA (III)*; Millcreek, PA (III); Moyer
Landfill, PA (III); Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III); Ordnance Works Disposal Areas
(Amendment), WV (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*; fybouts Corner, DE (III); Tyson's Dump, PA
(III); Wade, PA (III); West Virginia Ordnance, WV (III)*; Airco, KY (IV); Alpha Chemical, FL
(IV); A L. Taylor, KY (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Davie
Landfill, FL (IV); Flowood, MS (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Hipps Road Landfill, FL (IV);
Newport Dump Site, KY (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Sodyeco, NC
(IV); Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits, FL (IV); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Belvidere Landfill, IL
(V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V); Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); E.H.
Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V);
Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Johns-Manville, IL (V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*;
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
353
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Capping (continued)
Kysor Industrial, MI (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Marion/Bragg
Landfill, MI (V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I,
IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); New Lyme, OH (V); Ninth Avenue Dump,
IN (V)*; Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN
(V); Oak Grove Landfill, MN (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Schmalz Dump, WI
(V)*; Seymour, IN (V)*; Summit National, OH (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Waste Disposal
Engineering, MN (V); Windom Dump, MN (V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Bio-Ecology
Systems Site, TX (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Crystal City Airport, TX
(VI); Geneva Industries, TX, (VI); Gurley Pit, AR, (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Industrial Waste
Control, AR (VI); Mid-South Wood, AR (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; Old Inger, LA (VI); Pesses
Chemical, TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); United
Creosoting, TX (VI); Aidex, IA (VII)*; Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Denver Radium III, CO
(VIII)*; Denver Radium/12th & Quivas, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Open Space, CO (VIII)*;
Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Smuggler Mountain, CO
(VIII); Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (K); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Iron Mountain Mine, CA
(DC); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Mountain View/Globe, AZ (IX); Selma Pressure Treating,
CA (EX); South Bay Asbestos, CA (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement
Bay/Nearshore (9/30/89), WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome
(12/30/87), WA (X); Gould, OR (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Pacific Hide and Fur, ID (X);
Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X); South Tacoma Channel-Well 12A, WA (X); Western
Processing, WA (X)*
Carbon Absorption (GAC)
Auburn Road, NH (I); Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & Beacon Heights, CT (I); Groveland
Wells, MA (I); Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*; McGuire, MA (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I);
O'Connor, ME (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I);
W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA .(I); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II)*; Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Fulton
Terminals, NY (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ (II); North Sea
Municipal Landfill, NY (II); Pepe Field, NJ (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Preferred Plating, NY
(II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Rockaway Borough Wellfield, NJ (II); Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ (II);
Bendix, PA (III); CryoChem, PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III); Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III);
West Virginia Ordnance, WV (III)*; Airco, KY (IV); American Creosote Works, TN (IV); Celanese
Fibers Operations, NC (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); Perdido
Groundwater, AL (IV); Big D Campground, OH (V); Wamchem, SC (IV); E.H. Schilling Landfill,
OH (V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Ionia City Landfill, MI
(V); Kysor Industrial, MI (V); Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills/St.
Anthony, MN (V)*; New Brighton-Interim Water Treatment, MN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI
(V)*; New Lyme, OH (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical,
MI (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Reilly Tar, MN (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical, MN
(V)*; Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V)*; Windom Dump, MN (V);
Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Old Inger, LA (VI); Old Midland Products, AR (VI); Sheridan
Disposal Services, TX (VI); South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*;
Hastings Ground Water, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings
Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*; Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain
Arsenal, CO (VIII); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ (IX); Intel
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
354
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Carbon Absorption (GAC) (continued)
(Mountain View), CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (DC); Litchfleld Airport, AZ (IX);
Litchfield Airport (9/26/89), AZ (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX); Operating Industries
(11/16/87), CA (IX)*; Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); San Fernando Area I, CA
(IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San Gabriel Area 1, CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley
(Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA (IX)*; Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX)*; Tucson International Airport, AZ
(IX); Northside Landfill, WA (X)
Decontamination
Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); Byron Barrel &
Drum, NY (II)*; Diamond Alkali, NJ (II) Ewan Property, NJ (II); Marathon Battery (9/30/88), NY
(II)*; SMS Instruments, NY (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking, PA
(III); Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III); American Creosote Works, TN (IV); Cape Fear Wood
Preserving, NC (IV); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Pristine, OH (V);
United Scrap Lead, OH (V); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Dixie Oil, TX (VI); Pesses Chemical, TX
(VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA
(IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX)
Dredging
Hocomonco Pond, MA (I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I);
Hudson River, NY (II); Lipari Landfill (7/11/88), NJ (II)*; Love Canal, NY (II); Marathon Battery,
NY (II); Marathon Battery (9/30/88), NY (II)*; Marathon Battery (9/29/89), NY (II)*; Vineland
Chemical, NJ (II); L.A Clarke & Son, VA (III); Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); Cape Fear
Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*;
Outboard Marine Corp., IL (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Atchison/Santa Fe
(Clovis), NM (VI); Tar Creek, OK (VI); Commencement Bay/Nearshore (9/30/89), WA (X)
Excavation
Baird & McGuire, MA (I); Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Beacon Heights, CT (I); Cannon
Engineering, MA (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Ottati &
Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Hocomonco Pond, MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Norwood PCBs,
MA (I); Nyanza Chemical, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Picillo Farm, RI (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard,
ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I);
Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkham Garage, NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); W.R. Grace (Acton
Plant), MA (I); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II)*; Brewster Well Field, NY (II);
Bridgeport, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II);
DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); D'Imperio Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property,
NJ (II)*; Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Moreau, NY (II); GE Wiring Devices, PR (II); Glen Ridge
Radium, NJ (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Krysowaty Farm, NJ (II); Lang Property, NJ (II); Lipari
Landfill (7/11/88), NJ (II)*; Love Canal, NY (II); Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Marathon
Battery (9/30/88), NY (II)*; Marathon Battery (9/29/89), NY (II)*; Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II);
Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ (II); PAS Oswego, NY (II); Pijak Farm, NJ (II); Reich Farm,
NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY (II); Swope Oil, NJ (II); Syncon Resins,
NJ (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ (II); Wide Beach, NY (II); Williams
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
355
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Excavation (continued)
Property, NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Berks Sand
Pit, PA (HI); Blosenski Landfill, PA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel,
DE (III); Douglassville, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Drake Chemical,
PA (HI); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Fike Chemical, WV (III); Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard, PA
(III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III)*; Kane & Lombard, MD (III); L.A.
Clarke & Son, VA (III); Lansdowne Radiation, PA (III)*; Leetown Pesticide, WV (III); Lehigh
Electric, PA (III); McAdoo-ERM, PA (III); McAdoo Associates, PA (III)*; Millcreek, PA (HI); MW
Manufacturing, PA (HI); Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III); Ordnance Works Disposal Areas
(Amendment), WV (III); Sand, Gravel & Stone, MD (III); Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III);
Taylor Borough, PA (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III); Tybouts Corner, DE (III); Westline, PA (III);
West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III); Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV); Airco, KY
(IV); American Creosote, FL (IV); American Creosote Works, FL (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV);
Brown Wood Preserving, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers,
NC (IV)*; Coleman Evans, FL (IV); Distler Brickyard, KY (IV); Distler Farm, KY (IV); Flowood,
MS (IV); Gallaway Ponds, TN (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV);
Hollingsworth, FL (IV); Kassouf-Kimberling Battery, FL (IV); Miami Drum Services, FL (IV);
Mowbray Engineering, AL (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); Palmetto Wood
Preserving, SC (IV); Sapp Battery, FL (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV);
Zellwood, FL (IV); A&F Materials-EDD, IL (V); Acme Solvents, IL (V); Alsco Anaconda, OH (V);
Arcanum Iron & Metal, OH (V); Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V); Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V);
Berlin & Farro, MI (V); Big D Campground, OH (V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Burrows
Sanitation, MI (V); Byron/Johnson Salvage, IL (V); Cemetery Dump, MI (V); Chem-Dyne-EDD,
OH (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Cross Bros., IL (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V);
E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Ionia City Landfill, MI (V); Lake
Sandy Jo, IN (V); LaSalle Electrical, IL (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*; Miami County
Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*;
Northernaire, MI (V); Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical
Corporation, IN (V); Old Mill, OH (V); Outboard Marine Corp., IL (V); Outboard Marine
(Amendment), IL (V); Pristine, OH (V); Republic Steel Quarry, OH (V); Rose Township, MI (V);
Schmalz Dump, WI (V); Seymour, IN (V)*; Summit National, OH (V); United Scrap Lead, OH
(V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis),
NM (VI); Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI); Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI)*; Bayou Sorrel, LA (VI); Brio
Refining, TX (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Geneva Industries, TX (VI); Dixie Oil, TX (VI); Gurley
Pit, AR (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR
(VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX(VI); Mid-South Wood, AR (VI); MOTCO, TX (VI); Motco, TX
(VI)*; Old Inger, LA (VI); Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); Petro-Chemical Systems, TX (VI); Sheridan
Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sikes Disposal Pits, TX (VI); Sol Lynn (03/25/88), TX (VI); South
Calvacade Street, TX (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Aidex, IA
(VII)*; Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; Ellisville, MO (VII); Ellisville Site Area, MO (VII)*; Findett,
MO (VII); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII); Kern-Pest Laboratory, MO (VII); Midwest
Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*; Shenandoah
Stables, MO (VII); Syntex Verona, MO (VII); Times Beach, MO (VII); Times Beach, MO (VII)*;
Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Burlington Northern (Somers),
MT (VIII); Denver Radium Site Streets, CO (VIII); Denver Radium III, CO (VIII)*; Denver
Radium/llth & Umatilla, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/12th & Quivas, CO (VIII)*; Denver
Radium/Card Property, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Open Sapce, CO (VIII)*; Denver
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
356
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Excavation (continued)
Radium/ROBCO, CO (VIII)*; Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO
(VIII); Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Smuggler Mountain, CO (VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO
(VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII)*; Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Celtor Chemical Works,
CA (IX); Celtor Chemical, CA (IX)*; Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Del Norte, CA (IX);
Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); IBM (San Jose), CA (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA
(IX); Jibboom Junkyard, CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); McColl, CA (IX); MGM
Brakes, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (DC); Selma Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Commencement
Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore (9/30/89), WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome
(12/30/87), WA (X); Gould, OR (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northwest Transformer, WA (X);
Pacific Hide and Fur, ID (X); Ponders Corner, WA (X)*; Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X);
South Tacoma, WA (X); South Tacoma Channel-Well 12A, WA (X)*; United Chrome, OR (X);
Western Processing, WA (X)*
Filling
Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Iron Horse Park, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard,
ME (I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); GE Wiring Devices, PR
(II); Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II); Marathon Battery (9/30/88), NY (II)*; Montclair/West Orange
Radium, NJ (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ
(II); Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Lehigh Electric, PA (III); Taylor
Borough, PA (III); Wade, PA (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE (III)*; Airco, KY (IV); Celanese/Shelby
Fibers, NC (IV)*; Coleman Evans, FL (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old
Reichhold, MS (IV); A&F Materials-EDD, IL (V)*; Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Auto Ion Chemicals,
MI (V); Big D Campground, OH (V); Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V);
Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Velsicol Chemical, IL (V);
Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); South
Calvacade Street, TX (VI); Tar Creek, OK (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Midwest
Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Syntex Verona, MO (VII); Monticello Vicinity Properties, UT
(VIII); Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII), Woodbury Chemical, CO
(VIII)*; Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); MGM Brakes,
CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northwest Transformer, WA (X)
Ground Water Monitoring
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA
(I)*; Groveland Wells, MA (I); Hocomonco Pond, MA (I); Industri-plex, MA (I); Keefe
Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I); Kellogg-Deering Well Field,
CT (I)*; Landfill & Resource Recovery, RI (I); Laurel Park, CT (I); McKin, ME (I); Norwood
PCBs, MA (I); Nyanza Chemical, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I);
Ottati & Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Picillo Farm, RI (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve,
MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; South Municipal Water
Supply, NH (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkham Garage, NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); Winthrop
Landfill-EDD, ME (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); Asbestos
Dump, NJ (II); BEC Trucking, NY (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II); Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*;
Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II)*; Chemical Control, NJ (II)*; Ciba-Geigy, NJ
(II)*; DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); Endicott Village Well Field, NY (II);
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
357
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Ground Water Monitoring (continued)
Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); Friedman
Property, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Moreau, NY (II); Haviland Complex, NY (II);
Hyde Park-EDD, NY (II); Katonah Municipal Well, NY (II); Kentucky Avenue Well Field, NY (II);
Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Krysowaty Farm, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (7/11/88), NJ (II)*; Love
Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Marathon Battery (9/30/88),
NY (II)*; Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II); Montgomery Township, NY (II); Montgomery Township
Housing, NJ (II)*; North Sea Municipal Landfill, NY (II); Old Bethpage, NY (II); PAS Oswego,
NY (II); Pepe Field, NJ (II); Pijak Farm, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Preferred
Plating, NY (II); Price Landfill, NJ (II)*; Reich Farm, NJ (II); Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY (II);
Rocky Hill, NJ (II); South Brunswick Landfill, NJ (II)*; Suffern Village Well Field, NY (II);
Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Vega Alta, PR (II); Vineland
Chemical, NJ (II); Vineland State School, NJ (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ
(II); Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Army Creek Landfill, DE (III); Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Bally
Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Bendix, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); Blosenski
Landfill, PA (III); Bruin Lagoon, PA (III)*; Chisman Creek, VA (III); Clothier Disposal,NY (II);
Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III);
Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA
(III)*; Henderson Road, PA (III); Kane & Lombard, MD (III); Kimberton, PA (III); Kimberton, PA
(III)*; L.A. Clarke & Son, VA (III); Limestone Road, MD (III); Middletown Airfield, PA (III);
Millcreek, PA (III); Moyer Landfill, PA (III); New Castle Spill, DE (III); Ordnance Works Disposal
Areas (Amendment), WV (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*; Reeser's Landfill, PA (III); Saltville
Waste Disposal Ponds, VA (HI); Taylor Borough, PA (III)*; Tybouts Corner, DE (III); Tyson's
Dump (Amendment), PA (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III)*; Voortman Farm, PA (III); West Virginia
Ordnance, WV (III)*; Westline, PA (III)*; Wildcat Landfill, DE (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE (III)*;
Airco, KY (IV); Alpha Chemical, FL (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Brown Wood Preserving, FL
(IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Carolawn, SC (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV);
Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); Flowood, MS (IV); Gallaway Ponds, TN
(IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Hipps Road Landfill, FL (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); Newsome
Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); Pepper's Steel-EDD, FL (IV); Pioneer Sand, FL (IV); Powersville
Landfill, GA (IV); Sapp Battery, FL (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek),
AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV); A&F Materials-EDD,
IL (V)*; Allied/fronton Coke, OH (V)*; Arcanum Iron & Metal, OH (V); BeMdere Landfill, IL
(V); Big D Campground, OH (V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Byron
Salvage, IL (V)*; Byron Salvage (6/30/89), IL (V)*; Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Coshocton Landfill,
OH (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Eau Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; E.H.
Schilling Landfill, OH (V); FMC Corporation, MN (V)*; Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort
Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V); IMC Terre
Haute, IN (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Ionia City Landfill, MI (V); Johns-Manville, IL
(V); Kummer Sanitary Landfill, MN (V)*; Kysor Industrial, MI (V); Lake Sandy Jo, IN (V);
Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Long Prairie, MN (V); Marion/Bragg Landfill, IN (V); Mason County
Landfill, MI (V); Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V);
Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; New Lyme, OH (V); Ninth Avenue
Dump, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Northside Sanitary
Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Novaco Industries, MI (V);
Oak Grove Landfill, MN (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment),
IL (V); Pristine, OH (V); Reilly Tar & Chemical, MN (V)*; Republic Steel Quarry, OH (V);
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
358
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Ground Water Monitoring (continued)
Schmalz Dump, WI (V)*; Seymour, IN (V)*; South Andover, MN (V); Summit National, OH (V);
United Scrap Lead, OH (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Waste Disposal
Engineering, MN (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Windom
Dump, MN (V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), MM (VI); Bayou Sorrel, LA (VI); Bio-Ecology Systems,
TX (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cecil Lindsey, AR (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Dixie.Oil, TX
(VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Geneva Industries, TX (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI);
Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI)*; Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI);
Mid-South Wood, AR (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium
II, TX (VI)*; Sand Springs, OK (VI)*; Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal
Services, TX (VI)*; Sikes Disposal Pits, TX (VI); Sol Lynn (09/23/88), TX (VI)*; South Calvacade
Street, TX (VI); South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*; South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; South
Valley/SJ-6, NM. (VI)*; United Nuclear, NM (VI); Aidex, IA (VII)*; Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII);
Big River Sand, KS (VII); Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA
(VII); Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Ellisville Site Area, MO (VII)*; Fulbright/Sac River
Landfill, MO (VII); Hastings Ground Water, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue,
NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*; Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Todtz,
Lawrence Farm, IA (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Arsenic Trioxide, ND (VIII); Broderick
Wood Products, CO (VIII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); California Gulch, CO (VIII);
Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Marshall Landfill, CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO
(VIII); Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Smuggler Mountain, CO (VIII); Union Pacific, WY (VIII);
Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII); Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Beckman Instruments/Porterville,
CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); Fairchild
Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX);
Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA (IX);
MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX); Purity Oil Sales, CA (EX); Raytheon, CA
(IX); San Fernando Area I, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San Gabriel Area I,
CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA (IX)*; Selma Pressure Treating, CA (DC);
Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX); Colbert Landfill, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Nearshore,
WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Gould, OR (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X);
Northside Landfill, WA (X); Northwest Transformer, WA (X); Pacific Hide and Fur, ID (X); Queen
City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X); Toftdahl Drum, WA (X)
Ground Water Treatment
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA
(I)*; Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Industri-plex, MA (I); Keefe
Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I); Kellogg-Deering Well Field,
CT (I)*; McKin, ME (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT
(I); Ottati & Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose
Disposal Pit, MA (I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Sylvester,
NH (I); Sylvester-S, NH (I); Tinkham Garage, NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); Winthrop
Landfill-EDD, ME (I); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II)*; Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Byron Barrel &
Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II)*; Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Combe Fill South Landfill, NJ
(II); DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); D'Imperio Property, NJ (II); Endicott
Village Well Field, NY (II); FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE
Moreau, NY (II); GEMS Landfill, NJ (II); GE Wiring Devices, PR (II); Goose Farm, NJ (II);
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
359
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Ground Water Treatment (continued)
Haviland Complex, NY (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Hyde Park-EDD, NY (II); Katonah Municipal
Well, NY (II); Kin-Sue Landfill, NJ (II); Lang Properly, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (9/30/85), NJ (II)*;
Lipari Landfill (7/11/88), NJ (II)*; Montgomery Township Housing, NJ (II)*; Nascolite, NJ (II); Old
Bethpage, NY (II); Clean Well Field, NY (II); PAS Oswego, NY (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II);
Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Preferred Plating, NY (II); Price Landfill, NJ (II)*; Reich Farm,
NJ (II); Rockaway Borough Wellfield, NJ (II); Rocky Hill, NJ (II); Sharkey Landfill, NJ (II); SMS
Instruments, NY (II); Syncon Resins, NJ (II); Tabernacle Drum Dump, NJ (II); Upjohn
Manufacturing, PR (II); Vega Alta, PR (II); Vestal, NY (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Williams
Property, NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA
(HI); Bendix, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); Blosenski Landfill, PA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA
(III); Croydon TCE Spill, PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*;
Harvey-Knott, DE (HI); Heleva Landfill, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III);
Leetown Pesticide, WV (HI); Middletown Airfield, PA (III); Millcreek, PA (III); Southern Maryland
Wood, MD (III); Strasburg Landfill, PA (III); Tybouts Corner, DE (III); West Virginia Ordnance,
WV (hi)*; Airco, KY (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Carolawn, SC (IV); Celanese
Fibers Operations, NC (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics
(Amendment), NC (TV); Coleman Evans, FL (IV); Distler Brickyard, KY (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY
(IV); Hipps Road Landfill, FL (IV); Hollingsworth, FL (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); Palmetto
Wood Preserving, SC (IV); Perdido Groundwater, AL (IV); Sapp Battery, FL (IV); SCRDI Dixiana,
SC (IV); Sodyeco, NC (IV); Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne
Plant), AL (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV); Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits, FL
(IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V); Belvidere
Landfill, EL (V); Big D Campground, OH (V); Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V); Cross Brothers Pail
(Pembroke), IL (V); Eau Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; FMC Corporation, MN (V)*; Fort
Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Industrial
Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Kysor Industrial, MI (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*;
LeHJllier/Mankato, MN (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Long Prairie, MN (V); Miami County
Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills/St. Anthony, MN (V)*; New
Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; New Lyme, OH (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Novaco
Industries, MI (V); Old Mill, OH (V); Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Pristine, OH (V); Rose
Township, MI (V); Seymour, IN (V); Summit National, OH (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); Velsicol
Chemical, IL (V); Verona Well Field, MI (V)*; Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Waste Disposal
Engineering, MN (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V)*; Brio
Refining, TX (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Geneva Industries, TX (VI);
Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Motco, TX
(VI)*; North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium II, TX
(VI)*; Old Midland Products, AR (VI); Sol Lynn (09/23/88), TX (VI)*; South Calvacade Street, TX
(VI); South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*; South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; United Nuclear, NM
(VI); Chemplex, IA (VII); Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA
(VII); Des Moines TCE, IA (VII); Findett, MO (VII); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Vogel Paint
& Wax, IA (VII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); California Gulch, CO (VIII); Libby
Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Marshall Landfill, CO (VIII); Rocky Mountain Arsenal, CO (VIII);
Union Pacific, WY (VIII); Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX); Del Norte, CA (IX); Fairchild
Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); Indian Bend Wash, AZ
(IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ
(IX); Litchfield Airport (9/26/89), AZ (IX); Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA (IX); MGM Brakes, CA
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
360
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Ground Water Treatment (continued)
(IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX); Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); Sacramento
Army Depot, CA (IX); San Fernando Area I, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley(Area 1), CA (IX); San
Gabriel Area I, CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA (IX)*; Selma Pressure Treating,
CA (IX); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX); Tucson International Airport, AZ (IX); Colbert Landfill,
WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*;
Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northside Landfill, WA (X); Ponders Corner, WA (X)*; South Tacoma
Channel-Well 12A, WA (X)*; United Chrome, OR (X); Western Processing, WA (X)*
Incineration/Thermal Destruction
Baird & McGuire, MA (I); Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Charles
George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Landfill & Resource Recovery, RI (I);
O'Connor, ME (I); Ottati & Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Rose
Disposal Pit, MA (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Bog Creek Farm,
NJ (II); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II)*; Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Bridgeport, NJ (II); DeRewal
Chemical, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); Hyde Park-EDD, NY (II);
Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (7/11/88), NJ (II)*; Love Canal, NY (II)*; Reich Farm, NJ
(II); Swope Oil, NJ (II); Williams Property, NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III);
Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Drake
Chemical, PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Fike Chemical, WV (III); Lackawanna Refuse Site,
PA (III); MW Manufacturing, PA (III); Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III); Southern Maryland
Wood, MD (III); Westline, PA (III); Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE (III);
Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV); American Creosote Works, TN (IV); Celanese/Shelby
Fibers, NC (IV)*; Coleman Evans, FL (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Mowbray Engineering, AL
(IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Soydeco, NC (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV);
Acme Solvents, IL (V); Arrowhead Refinery, MN (V); Berlin & Farro, MI (V); Big D Campground,
OH (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Fields Brook, OH (V);
Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); LaSalle Electrical, IL (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*;
Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V)*; Metamora Landfill, MI (V); New
Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Outboard Marine
(Amendment), IL (V); Rose Township, MI (V); Spiegelberg Landfill, MI (V); Summit National, OH
(V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Wedzeb Enterprises, IN (V); Bayou Bonfouca, LA
(VI)*; Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK
(VI); MOTCO, TX (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; Sikes Disposal Pits, TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal
Services, TX (VI); South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); Triangle Chem., TX (VI); United Creosoting,
TX (VI)*; Hastings Ground Water, NE (VII); Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*; Syntex
Verona, MO (VII); Times Beach, MO (VII)*; Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Sand Creek
Industrial, CO (VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII)*; Western
Processing, WA (X)
Leachate Collection/Treatment
Beacon Heights, CT (I); Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Charles George, MA (I)*; Laurel
Park, CT (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Picillo Farm, RI (I); Combe Fill South Landfill, NJ
(II); GEMS Landfill, NJ (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill
(9/30/85), NJ (II)*; Lipari Landfill (7/11/88), NJ (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Pepe Field,
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
361
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Leachate Collection/Treatment (continued)
NJ (H); Price Landfill, NJ (II)*; Volney Landfill, NY (II); Henderson Road, PA (III)*; Moyer
Landfill, PA (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*; Tyson's Dump (Amendment), PA (III); Airco, KY
(IV); American Creosote Works, FL (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Newport Dump Site, KY (IV);
Pioneer Sand, FL (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); AUied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; Coshocton Landfill,
OH (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Mid-State Disposal, WI
(V); New Lyme, OH (V); Northside Sanitary Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical
Corporation, IN (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V); Wauconda Sand
& Gravel, IL (V)*; Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Petro-Chemical Systems, TX (VI); Vogel Paint &
Wax, IA (VII); Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries (09/30/88), CA
(IX)*; Ordot Landfill, GU (EX); Martin Marietta, OR (X); United Chrome, OR (X)
Levees
Baird & McGuire, MA (I); Douglassville, PA (III); American Creosote Works, TN (IV); Old Inger,
LA (VI) Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Times Beach, MO (VII)*; South Bay Asbestos, CA
(IX)
Oflsite Discharge
Groveland Wells, MA (I); Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*; Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I);
Ottati & Goss/Great Lakes, NH (I); Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II)*;
DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; GE Moreau, NY (II); GE Wiring Devices, PR
(II); Katonah Municipal Well, NY (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (7/11/88), NJ (II)*;
Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Vega Alta,
PR (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Henderson
Road, PA (III); Airco, KY (TV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Carolawn, SC (IV);
Ciba-Geigy, AL (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); Wamchem, SC
(TV);Belvidere Landfill, EL (V); Eau Claire Municipal Well Field, WI (V)*; FMC Corporation, MN
(V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, EN (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH
(V)*; Kysor Industrial, MI (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*; Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V);
Long Prairie, MN (V); Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP),
MN (V); Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Summit National, OH (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); Velsicol
Chemical, IL (V); Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Wedzeb
Enterprises, IN (V); French Limited, TX (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Chemplex, IA
(VII); Conservation Chemical, MO (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Findett, MO
(VIE); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO
(VIII); Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA (EX); Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); IBM
(San Jose), CA (EX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Litchfield Airport (9/26/89), AZ (IX); MGM
Brakes, CA (IX); Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA (IX)*; Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Sacramento
Army Depot, CA (IX); San Fernando Area I, CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA
(IX)*; Selma Pressure Treating, CA (EX); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX) Tucson International
Airport, AZ (EX); Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA (X)*; Northside Landfill, WA (X)
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
362
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Offsite Disposal
Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Cannon/Plymouth, MA (I); Keefe Environmental, NH (I);
McKin-IRM, ME (I); McKin, ME (I)*; O'Connor, ME (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I);
Re-Solve, MA (I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Burnt Fly
Bog, NJ (II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Chemical Control, NJ (II);
Claremont Polychemical, NY (II)*; D'Imperio Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan
Property, NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); Fulton Terminals, NY (II); Glen Ridge Radium,
NJ (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Krysowaty Farm, NJ (II); Lang Property, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill,
NJ (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Marathon Battery, NY (II); Marathon Battery (9/30/88),
NY (II)*; Marathon Battery (9/29/89), NY (II)*; Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II); Montclair/West
Orange Radium, NJ (II); Pepe Field, NJ (II); Pijak Farm, NJ (II); Preferred Plating, NY (II); Price
Landfill, NJ (II)*; Reich Farm, NJ (II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); Ringwood Mines/Landfill, NY (II);
SMS Instruments, NY (II); Spence Farm, NJ (H); Swope Oil, NJ (II); Syncon Resins, NJ (II); Vega
Alta, PR (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Waldick Aerospace, NJ (II); Williams Property, NJ (II);
Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); Bruin Lagoon, PA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA
(III); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Douglassvffle Disposal,
PA (III)*; Enterprise Avenue, PA (III); Fike Chemical, WV (III); Havertown PCP, PA
(III);Harvey-Knott, DE (III); Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard, PA (III); Lackawanna Refuse Site, PA
(III); Lansdowne Radiation, PA (III)*; Leetown Pesticide, WV (III); Lehigh Electric, PA (III);
McAdoo-IRM, PA (III); McAdoo Associates, PA (III)*; MW Manufacturing, PA (III);
Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking, PA (III); Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds, VA (III); Sand, Gravel &
Stone, MD (III); Strasburg Landfill, PA (III); Taylor Borough, PA, (III); Westline, PA (III); West
Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III); Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III); Wildcat Landfill, DE (III);
American Creosote Works, TN (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Brown Wood Preserving, FL (IV);
Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Distler Brickyard, KY (IV); Miami Drum Services, FL (IV);
Newsome Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC (IV); Pepper's
Steel-EDD, FL (IV); SCRDI Dixiana, SC (IV); Soydeco, NC (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); A&F
Materials-IRM, IL (V); A&F Materials-EDD, IL (V)*; Acme Solvents, IL (V); Alsco Anaconda, OH
(V); Arcanum Iron & Metal, OH (V); Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Berlin & Farro, MI (V);
Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Byron/Johnson Salvage Yard, IL (V); Byron
Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; Cemetery Dump, MI (V); Chem-Dyne-EDD, OH (V); Cross Bros., IL (V);
Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Forest Waste, MI (V)*;
Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Johns-Manville, IL (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*;
Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V)*; MIDCO I, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Northernaire, MI
(V); Old Mill, OH (V); Outboard Marine Corp., IL (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V);
Pristine, OH (V); Republic Steel Quarry, OH (V); Rose Township, MI (V); Schmalz Dump, WI
(V); Seymour, IN (V)*; Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V); Wedzeb Enterprises, IN (V); Bayou
Bonfouca, LA (VI); Bayou Sorrel, LA (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cecil Lindsey, AR (VI); Dixie
Oil, TX (VI); Geneva Industries, TX (VI); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI); MOTCO, TX (VI);
Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); Triangle Chem., TX (VI);
United Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Aidex-IRM, IA (VII); Aidex, IA (VII)*; Chemplex, LA (VII); Deere,
John, Dubuque Works, LA (VII); Ellisville, MO (VII); Ellisville Site Area, MO (VII)*; Findett, MO
(VII); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII); Kern-Pest Laboratory, MO (VII); Midwest
Manufacturing/North Farm, LA (VII); Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*; Syntex Verona, MO
(VII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Denver Radium Site Streets, CO (VIII); Denver
Radium III, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/llth & Umatilla, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/12th &
Quivas, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Card Property, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Open Space, CO
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
363
-------
TECHNOLOGY
OfTsite Disposal (continued)
(VIII)*; Denver Radium/ROBCO, CO (VIII)*; Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Woodbury
Chemical, CO (VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII)*; Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA (IX);
Celtor Chemical Works, CA (IX); Celtor Chemical, CA (IX)*; Del Norte CA (IX); Jibboom
Junkyard, CA (DC); McColl, CA (DC); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos Area, CA (DC)*;
Slringfellow Acid Pits-IRM, CA (DC); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Commencement
Bay/Nearshore (9/30/89), WA (X); Gould, OR (X); Ponders Corner, WA (X)*; Queen City
Farms-ERM/EDD, WA (X); South Tacoma Channel-Well 12A, WA (X)*; United Chrome, OR (X);
Western Processing, WA (X); Western Processing, WA (X)*
Offsite Treatment
Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Laurel Park, CT (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME
(I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Claremont Polychemical, NY
(II)*; DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; FAA Technical
Center, NJ (II); GE Moreau, NY (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Renora Inc.,
NJ (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II);
Williams Property, NJ (H); York Oil, NY (II); Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Bendix, PA (III); Berks
Sand Pit, PA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal, PA (III)*; Fike Chemical,
WV (III); Havertown PCP, PA (III); MW Manufacturing, PA (III); Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking,
PA (IH); Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III); Strasburg Landfill, PA (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III)*;
Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III); American Creosote Works, TN (IV); Sodyeco, NC (IV); Tower
Chemical, FL (IV); Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Auto Ion Chemicals, MI (V); Cliff/Dow Dump, MI
(V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V)*; Miami County
Incinerator, OH (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Wedzeb
Enterprises, IN (V); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); South
Calvacade Street, TX (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Doepke Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII);
Findett, MO (VII); Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*; Syntex Verona, MO (VII); Vogel
Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Woodbury Chemical, CO (VIII)*;
Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X)
Onsite Containment
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Landfill & Resource Recovery, MA (I);
Re-Solve, MA (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Asbestos Dump, NJ
(II); Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; GE Moreau, NY (II); Hudson River,
NY (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (9/30/85), NJ (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY
(II); Pepe Field, NJ (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Delaware
Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III); Enterprise
Avenue, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III)*; Kane & Lombard, MD (III); Millcreek, PA (III);
Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*; Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III);
West Virginia Ordnance, WV (III)*; Wildcat Landfill, DE (III); Airco, KY (IV); Davie Landfill, FL
(IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Allied/Ironton
Coke, OH (V)*; E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Lake Sandy Jo,
IN (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Mason County Landfill, MI (V); New Lyme, OH (V); Ninth
Avenue Dump, IN (V); Outboard Marine Corp., IL (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V);
Summit National, OH (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Windom Dump, MN (V); Bayou Sorrel, LA
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
364
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Onsite Containment (continued)
(VI); Bio-Ecology Systems, TX (VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI);
Motco, TX (VI)*; South Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); South Valley/Edmonds Street, NM (VI)*;
United Creosoting, TX (VI); Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; Doepke
Disposal (Holliday), KS (VII); Ellisville Site Area, MO (VII)*; Findett, MO (VII); Times Beach,
MO (VII); Anaconda Smelter/Mill Creek, MT (VIII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII);
Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (IX); Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA
(IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); South Bay Asbestos, CA (DC); Tucson International
Airport, AZ (DC); Commencement Bay/Nearshore (9/30/89), WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma,
WA (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Northside Landfill, WA (X); Pacific Hide and Fur, ID (X);
Western Processing, WA (X)*
Onsite Discharge
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Keefe
Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Norwood PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Pinette's Salvage
Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); Bog Creek
Farm, NJ (II)*; Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Endicott Village Well Field, NY (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*;
Havertown PCP, PA (III); Haviland Complex, NY (II); Montgomery Township Housing, NJ (II)*;
Nascolite, NJ (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Preferred Plating,
NY (II); Rocky Hill, NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Williams
Property, NJ (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Bally Groundwater
Contamination, PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Havertown PCP, PA (III); Henderson
Road, PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III)*; West Virginia Ordnance, WV (III)*; Wildcat Landfill, DE
(III)*; Celanese Fibers Operations, NC (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*; Newsome
Brothers/Old Reichhold, MS (IV); Perdido Groundwater, AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek),
AL (IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Zellwood, FL (IV); Big D Campground,
OH (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Liquid Disposal,
MI (V); Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Ninth Avenue
Dump, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Wausau Water
Supply, WI (V); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI);
Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI)*; Odessa Chromium II, TX (VI)*; Sheridan Disposal Services, TX
(VI); Sol Lynn (09/23/88), TX (VI)*; South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South Valley/Edmunds
Street, NM (VI)*; United Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII); Burlington
Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View),
CA (IX); IBM (San Jose), CA (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (DC); Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA
(IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); Martin Marietta, OR (X)
Onsite Land Disposal
Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I);
Hocomonco Pond, MA (I); Iron Horse Park, MA (I); Laurel Park, CT (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I);
Picillo Farm, RI (I); Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); Sullivan's
Ledge, MA (I); Tinkham Garage, NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I);
Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Chemical Control, NJ (II)*; DeRewal
Chemical, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Wiring Devices, PR (II);
Love Canal, NY (II); Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II);
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
365
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Onslte Land Disposal (continued)
Marathon Battery (9/30/88), NY (II)*; Old Bethpage, NY (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Ambler
Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III);
Drake Chemical, PA (IE); Enterprise Avenue, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III)*; Ordnance
Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (HI); Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); Aberdeen
Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV); Airco, KY (IV); American Creosote, FL (IV); American Creosote
Works, FL (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC
(IV); Flowood, MS (IV); Gallaway Ponds, TN (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Kassouf-Kimberling
Battery, FL (IV); Sapp Battery, FL (IV); SCRDI Dixiana, SC (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV);
Arcanum Iron & Metal, OH (V); Big D Campground, OH (V); Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Cliff/Dow
Dump, MI (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); IMC Terre Haute,
IN (V); LaSalle Electrical, IL (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V); Liquid Disposal, MI (V); MIDCO I,
IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Northside Sanitary
Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Outboard Marine
(Amendment), IL (V); Schmalz Dump, WI (V)*; Summit National, OH (V); United Scrap Lead,
OH (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Bayou Bonfouca, LA
(VI)*; Crystal City Airport, TX (VI); Gurley Pit, AR (VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Industrial
Waste Control, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; Pesses Chemical, TX
(VI); Petro-Chemical Systems, TX (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sikes Disposal Pits,
TX (VI); United Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Aidex, IA (VII)*; Times Beach, MO (VII)*; Vogel Paint &
Wax, IA (VII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); Denver Radium III, CO (VIII)*; Libby
Ground Water, MT (VIII)*; Smuggler Mountain, CO (VIII); Atlas Asbestos Mine, CA (IX);
Coalinga Asbestos Mine, CA (DC); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); Intel (Mountain View),
CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Mountain View/Globe, AZ (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX);
Commencement Bay/Nearshore (9/30/89), WA (X); Gould, OR (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X);
Northwest Transformer, WA (X); Western Processing, WA (X)*
Onsite Treatment
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Charles
George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Iron Horse
Park, MA (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*;
Norwood PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Pinette's Salvage
Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); South Municipal Water Supply, NH
(I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Bog Creek
Farm, NJ (II)*; Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II)*; Chemical Control, NJ
(II)*; Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Endicott Village Well Field, NY (II); Ewan
Property, NJ (II)*; Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Moreau, NY (II); GE Wiring Devices, PR (II);
Haviland Complex, NJ (II); Katonah Municipal Well, NY (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari
Landfill (7/11/88), NJ (II)*; Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Love Canal, NY (II)*; Ludlow
Sand & Gravel, NY (II); Marathon Battery (9/30/88), NY (II)*; Marathon Battery (9/29/89), NY
(II)*; Montgomery Township Housing, NJ (II)*; Nascolite, NJ (II); Pepe Field, NJ (II); Picatinny
Arsenal, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Preferred Plating, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ
(II); Renora Inc., NJ (II); Rocky Hill, NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Upjohn Manufacturing,
PR (II); Vega Alta, PR (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II); Waldick
Aerospace, NJ (II); Williams Property, NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III);
Avtex Fibers, VA (HI); Bally Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Bendix, PA (III); Berks Sand
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
366
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Onsite Treatment (continued)
Pit, PA (III); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III); Douglassville
Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Havertown PCP, PA (III); Henderson
Road, PA (III); Hebelka Auto Salvage Yard, PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III)*;
L.A. Clarke & Son, VA (III); Middletown Airfield, PA (III); Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III);
Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III); Palmerton
Zinc, PA (III)*; Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds, VA (III); Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III);
Tyson's Dump (Amendment), PA (HI); Tyson's Dump, PA (III)*; West Virginia Ordnance, WV
(III)*; Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV); Airco, KY (IV); American Creosote Works, TN
(IV); American Creosote Works, FL (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Brown Wood Preserving, FL
(IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Celanese Fibers Operations, NC (IV); Celanese/Shelby
Fibers, NC (IV)*; Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics (Amendment), NC (IV); Flowood, MS (IV);
Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Kassouf-Kimberling Battery, FL (IV);
National Starch, NC (IV); Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC (IV); Perdido Groundwater, AL (IV);
Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Sodyeco, NC (IV); Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek), AL (IV); Stauffer
Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV); Zellwood, FL
(IV); Allied/fronton Coke, OH (V)*; Belvidere Landfill, IL (V); Big D Campground, OH (V);
Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Eau Claire Municipal Well
Field, WI (V)*; E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne
Reduction, IN (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V); Industrial Excess
Landfill, OH (V)*; Ionia City Landfill, MI (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL (V)*; Laskin/Poplar
Oil, OH (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V)*; Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Long Prairie, MN (V); Miami
County Incinerator, OH (V); MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills/St.
Anthony, MN (V)*; New Brighton (TCAAP), MN (V)*; New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN
(V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*; Northside Sanitary
Landfill/Environmental Conservation and Chemical Corporation, IN (V); Ott/Story/Cordova
Chemical, MI (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Pristine, OH (V); Seymour, IN (V)*;
Summit National, OH (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL
(V); Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI
(V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V)*; Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Bailey Waste Disposal,
TX (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); French Limited, TX (VI); Gurley Pit, AR
(VI); Hardage/Criner, OK (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI);
Motco, TX (VI)*; North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Odessa Chromium I, TX (VI)*; Odessa
Chromium II, TX (VI)*; Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); Sol Lynn (03/25/88), TX (VI); Sol Lynn
(09/23/88), TX (VI)*; South Calvacade Street, TX (VI); South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*;
South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; United Creosoting, TX (VI)*; Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII);
Chemplex, IA (VII); Deere, John, Dubuque Works, IA (VII); Hastings Groundwater/Colorado
Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*; Hastings Ground Water, NE
(VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Times Beach,
MO (VII)*; Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Burlington
Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); California Gulch, CO (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*;
Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Beckman Instruments/Porterville, CA(IX); Fairchild Semicond
(Mt. View), CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); IBM (San Jose), CA (IX); Indian
Bend Wash, AZ (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX);
Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA (IX); MGM Brakes, CA (IX); Motorola
52nd Street, AZ (IX); Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries (09/30/88),
CA (IX)*; Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); Sacramento Army Depot, CA (IX); San
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
367
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Onsite Treatment (continued)
Fernando Area I, CA (DC); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (DC); San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2
& 4), CA (DC)*; Selma Pressure Treating, CA (DC); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (DC); Tucson
International Airport, AZ (DC); Colbert Landfill, WA (X) Frontier Hard Chrome (07/05/88), WA
(X)*; Frontier Hard Chrome (12/30/87), WA (X); Gould, OR (X); Martin Marietta, OR (X);
Northside Landfill, WA (X); Northwest Transformer, WA (X); Pacific Hide and Fur, ID (X)
Plume Management
Auburn Road Landfill, NH (I)*; Groveland Wells, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Old Springfield
Landfill, VT (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I); South Municipal Water
Supply, NH (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); Byron Barrel & Drum, NY
(II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II)*; Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; GE Moreau, NY (II); Haviland Company,
NY (II); Hyde Park-EDO, NY (II); Old Bethpage, NY (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); SMS
Instruments, NY (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Delaware Sand and
Gravel, DE (III); Havertown PCP, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III)*; Price Landfill, NJ (III);
Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Bower's Landfill, OH (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V); Cross
Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Hedblum Industries, MI (V);
Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; MIDCO II, IN (V); Northernaire Plating, MI (V)*;
Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Seymour, IN (V); U.S. Aviex, MI (V); Verona Well
Field-IRM, MI (V); Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V); Wausau Water
Supply, WI (V)*; Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI)*;
South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*; United Nuclear, NM (VI); Chemplex, IA (VII); Findett,
MO (VII); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); Libby Ground
Water, MT (VIII)*; Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Litchfield Airport, AZ (DC); Purity Oil
Sales, CA (DC); San Fernando Area I, CA (DC); San Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (DC);
Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X)
Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW)
Laurel Park, CT (I); Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I)Tinkham Garage, NH (I); GEMS Landfill, NJ
(II); GE Wiring Devices, PR (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II); Katonah Municipal Well, NY (II);
Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (9/30/85), NJ (II)*; Lipari Landfill (7/11/88), NJ (II)*;
Vega Alta, PR (II); Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III); Tybouts Corner, DE
(III); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); FMC Corporation, MN (V);
Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills
(TCAAP), MN (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); Seymour, IN (V); Wedzeb Enterprises,
IN (V); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Dixie Oil, TX (VI); Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); Doepke Disposal
(Holliday), KS (VII); Findett, MO (VII); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Sol Lynn (03/25/88), TX
(VI); Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Del Norte, CA (DC); Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); MGM
Brakes, CA (DC); Operating Industries (11/16/87), CA (IX)*; Operating Industries (09/30/88), CA
(DC)*; San Gabriel Area I, CA (DC); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (DC)*; Commencement Bay/Tacoma,
WA (X); Western Processing, WA (X)*
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
368
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Relocation
DeRewal Chemical, NJ (II); Lansdowne Radiation, PA (III); Lansdowne Radiation, PA (III)*; Waste
Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); Petro-Chemical Systems, TX (VI);
United Creosoting, TX (VI); Times Beach, MO (VII); Times Beach, MO (VII)*; Anaconda
Smelter/Mill Creek, MT (VIII); Mountain View/Globe, AZ (IX)
Solvent Extraction
Norwood PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Ewan Property, NJ
(II)*; Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V); United Creosoting, TX (VI)*
Slurry Wall
Sylvester, NH (I); Diamond Alkali, NJ (II); Florence Landfill, NJ (II); GE Moreau, NY (II); Helen
Kramer, NJ (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill, NJ (II); Lone Pine Landfill, NJ (II); PAS
Oswego, NY (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II); Kane & Lombard, MD (III); Southern Maryland Wood,
MD (III); Whitehouse Waste Oil Pits, FL (IV); Allied/fronton Coke, OH (V)*; E.H. Schilling
Landfill, OH (V); Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Ninth Avenue Dump,
IN (V); Outboard Marine (Amendment), EL (V); Schmalz Dump, WI (V)*; Summit National, OH
(V); Waste Disposal Engineering, MN (V); Bayou Sorrel, LA (VI); Geneva Industries, TX (VI);
Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Union Pacific, WY (VIII)
Soil Washing/Flushing
Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; Vineland Chemical,
NJ (II); L.A. Clarke & Son, VA (III); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (W); Cross Brothers Pail
(Pembroke), IL (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; United Scrap Lead, OH (V); U.S. Aviex, MI
(V); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI); South Calvacade Street, TX
(VI)
Solidification/Stabilization
Charles George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; O'Connor, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I); Sullivan's Ledge,
MA (I); W.R. Grace (Acton Plant), MA (I); Chemical Control, NJ (II)*; DeRewal Chemical, NJ
(II); Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Marathon Battery (9/30/88), NY (II)*; York Oil, NY
(II); Bruin Lagoon, PA (III); Bruin Lagoon, PA (III)*; Aladdin Plating, PA (III); Craig Farm Drum,
PA (III); Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Fike Chemical, WV (III); Hebelka Auto
Salvage Yard, PA (III); Ordnance Works Disposal Areas (Amendment), WV (III);
Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking, PA (III); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC
(IV)*; Chemtronics, NC (IV); Flowood, MS (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV); Mowbray
Engineering, AL (IV); Pepper's Steel, FL (IV); Pepper's Steel-EDD, FL (IV); Sapp Battery, FL
(IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Burrows
Sanitation, MI (V); Fields Brook, OH (V); Forest Waste, MI (V)*; Liquid Disposal, MI (V);
MIDCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V);
Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI); Cleve Reber, LA (VI); Gurley Pit, AR
(VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Mid-South Wood, AR (VI); Pesses Chemical, TX (VI);
Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Denver
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
369
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Solidification/Stabilization (continued)
Radium/ROBCO, CO (VIII); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX); Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Selma
Pressure Treating, CA (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Frontier Hard Chrome
(12/30/87), WA (X); Gould, OR (X); Pacific Hide andFur, ID (X); Queen City Farms-IRM/EDD,
WA (X); Queen City Farms, WA (X)
Surface Water Diversion/Collection
Charles George, MA (I)*; McKin, ME (I)*; Nyanza Chemical, MA (I); Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I);
Burnt Fly Bog, NJ (II)*; Chemical Insecticide, NJ (II); Blosenski .Landfill, PA (III); Chisman Creek,
VA (III)*; Dorney Road Landfill, PA (III); Harvey-Knott, DE (III); Heleva Landfill, PA (III);
Henderson Road, PA (III)*; Kane & Lombard, MD (III); Kimberton, PA (III)*; Leetown Pesticide,
WV (III); Moyer Landfill, PA (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*; Rhinehart Tire Fire, VA (III);
Saltville Waste Disposal Ponds, VA (III); Taylor Borough, PA (III); Tower Chemical, FL (IV);
Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V);
Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); California Gulch, CO
(VIII); Central City/Clear Creek, CO (VIII)*; Cherokee County, KS (VII)*; Stringfellow Acid Pits,
CA (IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Queen
City Farms-IRM/EDD, WA (X)
Surface Water Monitoring
Balrd & McGuire, MA (I)*; Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Saco
Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); BEC Trucking, NY (II); Chemical
Insecticide, NJ (II); Clothier Disposal,NY (II); Ludlow Sand & Gravel, NY (II); North Sea
Municipal Landfill, NY (II); Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Bally
Groundwater Contamination, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III); FAA Technical Center, NJ (II);
Havertown PCP, PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III)*; New Castle Steel DE (III); New Castle Spill, DE
(III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*; Alpha Chemical, FL (IV); Chemtronics, NC (IV); Chemtronics
(Amendment), NC (IV); National Starch, NC (IV); Big D Campground, OH (V); Byron Salvage
Yard, IL (V)*; Coshocton Landfill, OH (V); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH (V)*; Johns-Manville, IL
(V); Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); New Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN (V);
Ott/Story/Cordova Chemical, MI (V); Peterson Sand & Gravel, IL (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V);
Waite Park Wells, MN (V); Wauconda Sand & Gravel, IL (V)*; Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI)*;
Sand Springs, OK (VI)*; Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI)*; Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO
(VII); Solid State Circuits, MO (VII); Gould, OR (X)
Surface Water Treatment
Havertown PCP, PA (III); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Industrial Excess Landfill, OH
(V)*; Outboard Marine (Amendment), IL (V)
Temporary Storage
Ciba-Geigy, NJ (II)*; Ewan Property, NJ (II); Picatinny Arsenal, NJ (II); Fike Chemical, WV (III);
Publicker/Cuyahoga Wrecking, PA (III); Strasburg Landfill, PA (III); Airco, KY (IV); Brown Wood
Preserving, FL (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Petro-Chemical Systems, TX (VI); United Creosoting,
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
370
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Temporary Storage (continued)
TX (VI)*; Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII); Minker Stout/Stout, MO (VII);
Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*; Shenandoah Stables, MO (VII); Syntex Verona, MO
(VII); Times Beach, MO (VII)*; Broderick Wood Products, CO (VIII); Denver Radium HI, CO
(VIII)*; Denver Radium/llth & Umatilla, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium 12th & Quivas, CO (VIII)*;
Denver Radium/Card Property, CO (VIII)*; Denver Radium/Open Space Property, CO (VIII)*;
Denver Radium ROBCO, CO (VIII)*; Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*
Treatment Technology
Baird & McGuire, MA (I); Baird & McGuire, MA (I)*; Cannon Engineering, MA (I); Charles
George Landfill 3 & 4, MA (I)*; Davis Liquid Waste, RI (I); Groveland Wells, MA (I); Iron Horse
Park, MA (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*; Landfill
& Resource Recovery, RI (I); Norwood PCBs, MA (I); O'Connor, ME (I); Ottati & Goss/Great
Lakes, NH (I); Pinette's Salvage Yard, ME (I); Re-Solve, MA (I)*; Rose Disposal Pit, MA (I);
Sullivan's Ledge, MA (I); Tinkham Garage, NH (I); Wells G&H, MA (I); W.R. Grace (Acton
Plant), MA (I); Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Brewster Well Field, NY (II); Bog Creek Farm, NJ
(II); Bridgeport, NJ (II); Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Caldwell Trucking, NJ (II); Chemical
Control, NJ (II)*; Ewan Property, NJ (II); Ewan Property, NJ (II)*; FAA Technical Center, NJ (II);
Fulton Terminals, NY (II); GE Wiring Devices, PR (II); Goose Farm, NJ (II); Kin-Buc Landfill, NJ
(II); Lipari Landfill (7/11/88), NJ (II)*; Love Canal/93rd Street School, NY (II)*; Love Canal, NY
(II)*; Marathon Battery, NY (II); Marathon Battery (9/30/88), NY (II)*; Marathon Battery (9/29/89),
NY (II)*; Metaltec/Aerosystems, NJ (II); Montgomery Township Housing, NJ (II)*; Pepe Field, NJ
(II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Preferred Plating, NY (II); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Renora
Inc., NJ (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Syncon Resins, NJ (II); Upjohn Manufacturing, PR (II);
Vineland Chemical, NJ (II); Wide Beach, NY (II); Williams Property, NJ (II); York Oil, NY (II);
Ambler Asbestos Piles, PA (III); Avtex Fibers, VA (III); Bendix, PA (III); Berks Sand Pit, PA (III);
Bruin Lagoon, PA (III)*; Craig Farm Drum, PA (III); Delaware Sand and Gravel, DE (III);
Douglassville Disposal, PA (III)*; Drake Chemical, PA (III)*; Fike Chemical, WV (III); Kimberton,
PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III)*; L.A Clarke & Son, VA (III); Leetown Pesticide, WV (III); MW
Manufacturing, PA (III); Ordnance Works Disposal, WV (III); Ordnance Works Disposal Areas
(Amendment), WV (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*; Southern Maryland Wood, MD (III); Tyson's
Dump (Amendment), PA (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III)*; West Virginia Ordnance Works, WV (III);
Whitmoyer Laboratories, PA (III); Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV); American Creosote
Works, TN (IV); American Creosote Works, FL (IV); Amnicola Dump, TN (IV); Brown Wood
Preserving, FL (IV); Cape Fear Wood Preserving, NC (IV); Celanese/Shelby Fibers, NC (IV)*;
Celanese Fibers Operations, NC (IV); Coleman Evans, FL (IV); Geiger (C&M Oil), SC (IV);
Kassouf-Kimberling Battery, FL (IV); Mowbray Engineering, AL (IV); Newsome Brothers/Old
Reichhold, MS (IV); Palmetto Wood Preserving, SC (IV); Pepper's Steel-EDD, FL (IV); Sapp
Battery, FL (IV); Smith's Farm, KY (IV); Sodyeco, NC (IV); Stauffer Chemical (Cold Creek), AL
(IV); Stauffer Chemical (LeMoyne Plant), AL (IV); Tower Chemical, FL (IV); Wamchem, SC (IV);
Zellwood, FL (IV); Allied/fronton Coke, OH (V)*; Alsco Anaconda, OH (V); Arrowhead Refinery,
MN (V); Bayou Bonfouca, LA (VI); Big D Campground, OH (V); Burrows Sanitation, MI (V);
Cliff/Dow Dump, MI (V); Cross Brothers Pail (Pembroke), IL (V); E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V);
Forest Waste, MI (V)*; Fort Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Galesburg/Koppers, IL (V); Ionia City
Landfill, MI (V); Kysor Industrial, MI (V); LaSalle Electrical, IL (V); LaSalle Electrical Utilities, IL
(V)*; Laskin/Poplar, OH (V); Laskin/Poplar Oil, OH (V)*; Liquid Disposal, MI (V); Miami County
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
371
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Treatment Technology (continued)
Incinerator, OH (V); MTOCO I, IN (V); MIDCO II, IN (V); Mid-State Disposal, WI (V); New
Brighton/Arden Hills (TCAAP), MN (V); Ninth Avenue Dump, IN (V)*; Outboard Marine
(Amendment), IL (V); Pristine, OH (V); Seymour, IN (V)*; Summit National, OH (V); U.S. Aviex,
MI (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V)*; Wedzeb Enterprises, IN (V);
Atchison/Santa Fe (Clovis), NM (VI); Bailey Waste Disposal, TX (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI);
French Limited, TX (VI); Industrial Waste Control, AR (VI); Koppers/Texarkana, TX (VI);
MOTCO, TX (VI); Motco, TX (VI)*; North Cavalcade Street, TX (VI); Oil Mid-South Wood, AR
(VI); Old Midland Products, AR (VI); Pesses Chemical, TX (VI); Sikes Disposal Pits, TX (VI);
Sheridan Disposal Services, TX (VI); Sol Lynn (03/25/88), TX (VI); South Calvacade Street, TX
(VI); South Valley/Edmunds Street, NM (VI)*; South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; United Creosoting,
TX (VI)*; Arkansas City Dump, KS (VII); Hastings Ground Water, NE (VII); Hastings
Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII); Hastings Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*;
Midwest Manufacturing/North Farm, IA (VII); Minker/Stout/Romaine Creek, MO (VII)*; Syntex
Verona, MO (VII); Times Beach, MO (VII)*; Vogel Paint & Wax, IA (VII); Broderick Wood
Products, CO (VIII); Burlington Northern (Somers), MT (VIII); Libby Ground Water, MT (VIII)*;
Monticello Vicinity Properties, UT (VIII); Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Woodbury Chemical,
CO (VIII)*; Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View), CA (IX); Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX);
Indian Bend Wash, AZ (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX);
Litchfield Airport, AZ (IX); Lorentz Barrel & Drum, CA (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX);
Operating Industries (09/30/88), CA (IX)*; Purity Oil Sales, CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX); San
Fernando Valley (Area 1), CA (IX); San Gabriel Valley (Areas 1, 2 & 4), CA (IX)*; Selma
Pressure Treating, CA (EX); Stringfellow Acid Pits, CA (IX)*; Tucson International Airport, AZ
(IX); Commencement Bay/Nearshore, WA (X); Commencement Bay/Tacoma, WA (X); Frontier
Hard Chrome (12/30/87), WA (X); Gould, OR (X); Northwest Transformer, WA (X); Pacific Hide
and Fur, ID (X); Triangle Chemical, TX (VI); United Chrome, OR (X); Western Processing, WA
(X)*
Vacuum Extraction
Groveland Wells, MA (I); Keefe Environmental Services, NH (I)*; Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT
(I)*; South Municipal Water Supply, NH (I); FAA Technical Center, NJ (II); Pepe Field, NJ (II);
Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); SMS Instruments, NY (II); Bendix, PA (III); Tyson's Dump
(Amendment), PA (III); Airco, KY (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Kysor Industrial, MI (V); Miami
County Incinerator, OH (V); Seymour, IN (V); Verona Well Field, MI (V)*; Wausau Water Supply,
WI (V)*; South Valley/PL-83, NM (VI)*; Hastings Groundwater/Colorado Avenue, NE (VII);
Hastings Groundwater/FAR-MAR-CO, NE (VII)*; Sand Creek Industrial, CO (VIII); Litchfield
Airport, AZ (IX); Motorola 52nd Street, AZ (IX)
Venting
Beacon Heights, CT (I); Charles George, MA (I)*; GEMS Landfill, NJ (II); Helen Kramer, NJ (II);
Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Heleva Landfill, PA (III); Moyer Landfill, PA (III);
Allied/Ironton Coke, OH (V)*; IMC Terre Haute, IN (V); Long Prairie, MN (V); Mason County
Landfill, MI (V); New Lyme, OH (V); Bayou Sorrel, LA (VI); Brio Refining, TX (VI);
Hardage/Criner, OK (VI), Operating Industries (09/30/88), CA (IX)*; Martin Marietta, OR (X)
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
HDD Enforcement Decision Document
372
-------
TECHNOLOGY
Volatilization/Soil Aeration
Wells G&H, MA (I); Miami County Incinerator, OH (V); Fairchild Semicond (Mt. View) CA (IX)-
Fairchild Semicond (S San Jose), CA (IX); Intel (Mountain View), CA (IX); Raytheon, CA (IX)
Vitrification
Ionia City Landfill, MI (V); Northwest Transformer, WA (X)
MISCELLANEOUS
Municipally-Owned Site
Kellogg-Deering Well Field, CT (I)*; Winthrop Landfill-EDD, ME (I); North Sea Municipal
Landfill, NY (II); Pepe Field, NJ (II); Port Washington Landfill, NY (II); Rockaway Borough
Wellfield, NJ (II); Volney Landfill, NY (II); Army Creek Landfill, DE (HI); Enterprise Avenue PA
(III); Newport Dump Site, KY (IV); Powersville Landfill, GA (IV); Ionia City Landfill, MI (VY
New Brighton/Arden Hills (Amendment), MN (V); Wausau Water Supply, WI (V)*; Crystal City
Airport, TX (VI); Fulbright/Sac River Landfill, MO (VII); John's Sludge Pond, KS (VII)- Denver
Radium Site Streets, CO (VIII), Ordot Landfill, GU (IX)
Woodlands (FY 1982 - 1988 only)
Old Springfield Landfill, VT (I); Tinkham Garage, NH (I); Reich Farm, NJ (II); Lansdowne
Radiation, PA (III); Palmerton Zinc, PA (III); Forest Waste Disposal, MI (V)*; Mason County
Landfill, MI (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); Old Inger, LA (VI)
HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT
ACL
Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; Sylvester, NH (I); Western Sand & Gravel, RI (I); Winthrop
Landfill-EDD, ME (I); Yaworski Lagoon, CT (I); Bog Creek Farm, NJ (II); D'Imperio Property, NJ
(II); Goose Farm, NJ (II); Marathon Battery (9/30/88), NY (II)*; Vineland Chemical, NJ (II);
Blosenski Landfill, PA (III); Douglassville Disposal (Amendment), PA (III); Harvey-Knott DE (III)-
Henderson Road, PA (III); Henderson Road, PA (III)*; West Virginia Ordnance, WV (III)*- Airco'
KY (IV); Alpha Chemical, FL (IV); Goodrich, B.F., KY (IV); Newport Dump Site, KY (IV)-
SCRDI Dixiana, SC (IV); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (V)*; E.H. Schilling Landfill, OH (V); Fort
Wayne Reduction, IN (V); Velsicol Chemical, IL (V); Highlands Acid Pit, TX (VI); Aidex IA
(VII)*; Old Mill, OH (V); Martin Marietta, OR (X); Western Processing, WA (X)*
Background Levels
Nyanza Chemical, MA (I); Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II); Montclair/West Orange Radium NJ (in-
Industrial Lane, PA (III); Kimberton, PA (III)*; Palmerton Zinc, PA (III)*; Sand, Gravel & Stone
MD (III); Taylor Borough, PA (III); Aberdeen Pesticide/Fairway Six, NC (IV); Distler Brickyard KY
(IV); Distler Farm, KY (IV); Reilly Tar, MN (V); United Scrap Lead, OH (V); Wauconda Sand &
Gravel, IL (V)*; Triangle Chemical, TX (VI); United Nuclear, NM (VI); Aidex, IA (VII)*-
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
373
-------
inSTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT
Background Levels (continued)
Anaconda Smelter/Mill Creek, MT (VIII); Arsenic Trioxide, ND (VIII); Koppers (Oroville Plant),
CA (DC); Toftdahl Drum, WA (X)
Deferred Decision
Cannon/Plymouth, MA (I); Glen Ridge Radium, NJ (II); Lipari Landfill (9/30/85), NJ (II)*;
Montclair/West Orange Radium, NJ (II); Swope Oil, NJ (II); Douglassville, PA (III); McAdoo
Associates, PA (III)*; Taylor Borough, PA (III); Tyson's Dump, PA (III); American Cresote, FL
(IV); Davie Landfill, FL (IV); New Brighton/Arden Hills/St. Anthony, MN (V)*; Bayou Bonfouca,
LA (VI); Ponders Corner, WA (X)*; South Tacoma Channel-Well 12A, WA (X)*
Initial Remedial Measure (IRM)
New Brighton/Arden Hills (Amendment), MN (V)
Temporary Remedial Measure (FY 1982 - 1988 only)
Hudson River, NY (II); Byron Salvage Yard, IL (VI)*; Denver Radium/ROBCO, CO (VIII); Denver
Radium/Card Property, CO (VIII)*; Union Pacific, WY (VIII)
Contingent Remedy
Saco Tannery Waste Pits, ME (I)*; Byron Barrel & Drum, NY (II)*; Preferred Plating, NY (II);
SMS Instruments, NY (II); Windom Dump, MN (V); Koppers (Oroville Plant), CA (IX)
0 U.S.GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFF ICEi 1 990-748-15 9/00475
* Subsequent Record of Decision
S Supplemental Record of Decision
EDD Enforcement Decision Document
374
------- |